Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-11-18_COUNCIL MEETINGNov. 18, 2008 Hennepin County News Public Affairs • 612 - 348 -3848 • 300 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55487 -0011 Contacts: Jill Alverson, Taxpayer Services: 612 - 348 -4084; cell: 612 - 669 -3260 Carol Allis, Public Affairs: 612 - 348 -8536; cell: 612 - 910 -9114 Hennepin County's role in the recount process The Minnesota Office of the Secretary of State (OSS) today announced that the statewide recount of the Senate race will begin Wednesday, Nov. 19. The OSS is directing the recount procedure, which is being carried out under very specific Minnesota election law and detailed instructions from the OSS. Hennepin County's role in the procedure is to assist the OSS recount in Hennepin County. The OSS determined that there will be 19 recount sites in Hennepin County — Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Eden Prairie, Edina, Golden Valley, Hopkins, Independence, Maple Grove, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony, St. Louis Park and Shorewood. There is no recount occurring at the Hennepin County Government Center in downtown Minneapolis. Recount locations are available on the OSS website — www.sos.state.mn.us. Hennepin County will oversee the recount at the Independence site, which will count ballots from 12 cities. At all other locations within Hennepin County, city clerks will oversee the recount. City attorneys will provide legal assistance at the recount locations, and the Hennepin County Attorney's Office will be available as well for legal consultation. Recount updates will be available daily on the OSS website. General questions about the recount procedure should be directed to the OSS. For questions about Hennepin County's role in the recount process, call Jill Alverson, director of Taxpayer Services/Elections at 612 - 348 -4084; cell: 612 - 669 -3260. -- MORE -- Recount in Hennepin County /2 "The recount process is open to the public, but we will need the media and the general public's help in assuring that these recount officials are able to do their jobs," says Alverson. "If you go to any of these sites to observe, these officials are going to be terribly busy overseeing the recount. They will not have time to answer general procedural questions — they have to focus all their attention on the task at hand. Please call the Secretary of State for general recount information, or call me for information specific to Hennepin County." Recount locations, addresses, and names and phone numbers of recount officials are available from the OSS. A detailed explanation of the recount procedure also is available from the OSS. Alverson noted a few major points: • This is an administrative recount. It is not intended to determine who is eligible to vote; if campaign laws were violated; if absentee ballots were properly accepted and rejected; or if election judges followed proper procedure. It is simply to physically examine and recount every ballot by hand for this race. • Challenged ballots will be submitted to the State Canvassing Board, which will decide whether and how to count each challenged ballot. • The people who will count the ballots at the recount ( the "sorters ") are chosen by local elections officials (in many cases, they are elections staff and election judges) and are certified by the State Canvassing Board. Sorters determine for whom a ballot was cast according to guidelines in state statute that clearly define "voter intent." A recount official at each location oversees challenges. • An observer from each campaign can be present for each precinct being recounted. Hennepin County, the largest county in Minnesota, has 426 precincts. The voter turnout for this election was 83 percent, with 665,446 people voting. —30— Look for more news on the Hennepin County website — hennepin.us. �. AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of November 3, 2008 II. RESOLUTION No. 2008 -03 Modifying TIF Finance Plans Districts 1200, 1201 And 1203 III. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated November 6, 2008 TOTAL $7,948.78; and dated November 13, 2008 TOTAL $1,372.06. IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL Tiger Cub Den #5 - Cub Scot Pack 123 - Governance Badge Police Department Commendation Awards CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant Presentation Proclamation _ Minnesota Chemical Health Week * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 3 2008, Work Session of November 3, 2008 and Canvass of Election Returns of November 6, 2008 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To Agenda /Edina City Council November 18, 2008 Page 2 ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. V • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL VARIANCE DENIAL - Southdale Medical Center Resolution No. 2008 -116 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT - Galleria Shopping Center Resolution No. 2008 -11,5 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING ON ISSUANCE OF LIQUOR LICENSE Romano's Macaroni Grill, 7651 France Avenue (Favorable majority vote of Council Members present to approve) III. PUBLIC COMMENT During "Public Comment," the City Council will invite comments from those in attendance who would to speak about something not, on tonight's agenda. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was held by the Council within the last thirty days or a matter scheduled for a future hearing on a specific date. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of .majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2008 -117 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) * B. Resolution No. 2008 -118 Authorizing Special Assessment Deferrals * C. Traffic Safety Report of November 5, 2008 * D. Resolution No. 2008 -119 MnDOT Safe Routes to School V. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated November 6, 2008 TOTAL $366,360.68; and dated November 13, 2008 Agenda /Edina City Council November 18, 2008 Page 3 TOTAL $943,629.12; and credit card transactions dated September 26, 2008, to October 26, 2008 TOTAL $6,048.93. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS VIII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. -If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Nov 18 Canvass of Election Recount 5:00 P.M.. Tues Nov 18 Work Session - Comp Plan 5:15 P.M. Tues Nov 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 25 Study Session — CIP & Business Plans 7:00 A.M. Thur Nov 27 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 28 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Mon Dec 1 Truth In Taxation Hearing 5:00 P.M. Tues Dec 2 Work Session - Joint Session With Energy & Env. Comm 5:00 P.M. Tues Dec 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Dec 8 Truth In Taxation (Continuation Date) If needed Tues Dec 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Wed Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED _ City Hall Closes at noon Thur Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Wed Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S DAY EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon Thur Jan 1 NEW YEAR'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Jan 19 REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jan 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jan 27 Study Session - To be determined 7:00 A.M. Tues Feb 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Feb 16 PRESIDENT'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Feb 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Feb 24 Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 3, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF OCTOBER 21, 2008, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority from October 21, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Executive Director ovte To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: Budget Amendments to 50th and France, Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Districts Recommendation: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # HRA II. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ® To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve Resolution authorizing budget amendments to the 50th and France, Edinborough, and Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Districts as drafted by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers and Associates. Info /Background: Two of the City's Tax Increment Districts are classified as "pre -79" districts according to the tax increment statutes. According to the statutes, pre -79 districts (50th and France and Edinborough) may only expend funds to pay debt service after April 1, 2001. The City issued "pooled debt" for the acquisition and construction of Centennial Lakes park in 1988 and 1989. By issuing "pooled debt ", the principal and interest for the debt could be paid by 3 tax increment districts — Centennial Lakes, Edinborough, and 50th and France TIF districts. Under the current structure, the City pays the debt service out of the Centennial Lakes District and transfers funds from the 50th and Edinborough districts to help pay the debt service. At the time of issuance, this made the most sense since the debt is directly attributable to the Centennial district. The original 50th and France budget of $10,000,000 was increased to $15,000,000 in December 2005 and as of December 31, 2007 $675,000 remains in the budget for transfers to Centennial Lakes. For Edinborough, $168,301 remains in the original budget of $17,000,000 for transfers to Centennial Lakes. According to the estimated tax increment revenues 1P .• expected to be received in 2008 and the first half of 2009, if no further transfers over the current balance are made between the 50th and France and Edinborough districts and the Centennial Lakes district, the 50th district would decertify in 2009 with a balance of approximately $1,300,000 and the Edinborough district would decertify with a balance of approximately $4,000,000. Decertifying the 50th and France and Edinborough districts with the above balances would mean the transfer of the balance to Hennepin County with the County reallocating the payments back to the taxing jurisdictions based on their percentage share of the tax dollar which for The City of Edina is approximately 20 %. Transferring the proposed amount would add to the potential for additional projects to be funded in the Centennial Lakes District and the entire Southdale Development District in the future. The Centennial Lakes tax increment district will not be decertified until December 31, 2014. The City adopted the last budget amendment in December 2005. 4 Council member EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE OF NE NNESOTA introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2008-3 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1200 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1201 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1203. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors (the "Board ") of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The BRA has heretofore established Tax Increment Financing District-No. 1200, Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 (collectively the "TIF Districts ") and adopted Tax Increment Financing Plans (the "TIF Plans ") therefor. It has been proposed that the HRA adopt an administrative modification to the TIF Plans (the "Administrative Modifications ") for the TIF Districts; all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, and Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act "), all as reflected herein, and presented for the HRH's consideration. 1.02. The BRA has investigated the facts related to the Administrative Modification and has caused the Administrative Modification to be prepared. 1.03. The HRA has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption and approval of the proposed Administrative Modification. Because of the nature of this modification, and because this Administrative Modification does not entail an enlargement of geographic area, an increase in the amount of bonded indebtedness, an increase to the amount of interest on debt, an increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity, or an increase in the total estimated tax increment expenditures, this Administrative Modification is not subject to a public hearing requirement nor a notice to the County and School Districts. 1.04. The City is not modifying the boundaries of the TIF District. 1.05. The City is not extending the term of the TIF District. Section 2. Findings: 2.01. The Administrative Modification includes the reallocation of currently authorized tax increments to pay additional administrative costs. The Administrative Modification does not increase the TIF Plan's total budget. 2.02. The TIF Plans currently authorize tax increment revenues to be transferred from District No. 1200 and District No. 1201 into District No. 1203 for the payment of principal and interest on bonded 40 indebtedness. It is necessary and desirable to allow for the ability to account for the use of tax increment revenues to pay principal and interest on bonded indebtedness as either a transfer of funds or a direct expenditure. To comply with the reporting requirements of the Office of the State Auditor it is necessary to modify the budget for District #1200 (50 and France), District #1201 (Edinborough) and District #1203 (Centennial Lakes) to provide for additional transfer of tax increment revenue from District #1200 (50th and France) and District #1201 (Edinborough) to District #1203 (Centennial Lakes). The City hereby modifies the budgets for the TIF Districts as illustrated in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 3. Public Purpose. 3.01. The HRA hereby finds that the Administrative Modification conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Redevelopment Projects by private enterprise and will result in higher quality infrastructure in the City, and thereby serves a public purpose. Section 4. Approval of the Modification, Filing. 4.01. The budget for District #1200 (50th and France) is hereby modified to increase the line item for Transfers Out by $2,000,000, the budget for District #1201 (Edinborough) is hereby modified to increase the line item for Transfers Out by $5,000,000, and the budget for District #1203 (Centennial Lakes) is hereby modified to increase the line item for Transfers In by $7,000,000 and reduce corresponding line items for bond principal and bond proceeds. 4.01. The Administrative Modification is hereby approved, and shall be placed on file in the office of the Executive Director of the HRA. Approval of the Administrative Modification does not constitute approval of any project or a development agreement with any developer. 4.02. The staff of the City is authorized to file the Administrative Modification with the Hennepin County Auditor, the Minnesota Department of Revenue, and the Office of the State Auditor. 4.04. The staff of the City and the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Administrative Modification and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to the HRA for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority this 185` day of November, 2008 ATTEST: Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Chair I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of November 18, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ Executive Director C .j Sources of Funds Tax Increment Revenue Interest on Invested Funds Bond Proceeds Real Estate Sales Special Assessments Rent/Lease Revenue Grants Other State Aid Parking Permits Misc. Transfers in Total Sources of Funds Uses of Funds Land /Building Acquisition Site Imp. /Preparation Parking Facilities. Bond Principal Payments Bond Interest Payments Loan /Note Interest Administration Other Misc. Other Improvements Paid to other Govts. Total Uses of Funds District Balance (Deficiency) Transfers Out District Balance (Deficiency) Exhibit A AMENDED BUDGET - TID 1200 (50th & France) Expenses /Revenues Proposed Amended Current Budget thru 12 -31 -07 Budget $ 31,748,489 $ 24,571,448 $ 31,748,489 2,000,000 2,747,172 2,000,000 5,280,000 5,251,998 5,280,000 170,782 170,782 170,782 1,321, 096 728,505 1,321,096 186,064 186,064 186,064 418,871 418,871 418,871 268,524 268,524 268,524 73,881 73,881 73,881 $ 41,467,707 $ 34,417,245 $ 41,467,707 $ 873,061 $ 873,061 $ 873,061 5,742,378 5,742,378 5,742,378 2,124,656 2,119,654 2,124,656 34,460,000 5,360,000 32,460,000 24,468,956 4,140,864 24,468,956 463,037 463,037 463,037 1,230,000 1,205,451 1,230,000 62,095 63,010 62,095 27,901 27,901 27,901 21,000 18,982 21,000 $ 69,473,084 $ 20,014,338 $ 67,473,084 $ (28,005,377) $ 14,402,907 $ (26,005,377) $ 15,000,000 $ 14,325,000 $ 17,000,000 $ (43,005,377) $ 77,907 $ (43,005,377) NOTES: CURRENT BUDGET LESS BOND P &l, AND NOTE INTEREST: PROPOSED BUDGET LESS BOND P &1, AND NOTE INTEREST: Page 1 0 $ 10,081,091 $ 10,081,091 s ' Exhibit A Uses of Funds Land /Building Acquisition AMENDED BUDGET - TID 1201(EDINBOROUGH) 12,200,000 $ Expenses /Revenues $ Sources of Funds Current Budget thru 12 -31 -07 Amended Budget Tax Increment Revenue $ 75,000,000 $ 57,551,878 $ 75,000,000 Interest on Invested Funds 3,500,000 2,665,830 3,500,000 Bond Proceeds 21,470,000 20,219,852 21,470,000 Real Estate Sales 3,000,000 2,642,115 3,000,000 Loan Proceeds 1,321,096 1,672,612 1,321,096 Special Assessments - - - Rent/Lease Revenue - - - Grants - - - Other - - - CDBG 189,221 189,221 189,221 Misc. 50,000 1,357 50,000 Transfers in - - - Total Sources of Funds $ 104,530,317 $ 84,942,865 $ 104,530,317 Uses of Funds Land /Building Acquisition $ 12,200,000 $ 6,894,303 $ . 12,200,000 Site Imp. /Preparation 2,000,000 468,098 2,000,000 Public Utilities 16,000,000 14,278,823 16,000,000 Parking Facilities - - - Streets&Sidewalks - - - Park Facilities - - - Social /Recreational - - - Interest Reduction 1,850,000 1,672,612 1,850,000 Bond Principal Payments 50,650,000 22,445,000 45,650,000 Bond Interest Payments 39,830,627 19,772,264 39,830,627 Loan Principal Payments - - - Loan /Note Interest - - - Administration 1,800,000 1,673,988 1,800,000 Other - - - Park Dedication 767,852 767,852 767,852 Paid to other Govts. 110,000 91,949 110,000 Total Uses of Funds $ 125,208,479 $ 68,064,889 $ 120,208,479 District Balance (Deficiency) $ (20,678,162) $ 16,877,976 $ (15,678,162). Transfers Out $ 17,000,000 $ 16,831,699 $ 22,000,000 District Balance (Deficiency) $ (37,678,162) $ 46,277 $ (37,678,162) NOTE: CURRENT BUDGET LESS BOND P &l, AND NOTE INTEREST: $ 34,727,852 PROPOSED BUDGET LESS BOND P &I AND TRANSFERS: $ 34,727,852 Page 2 0 1 1 ,. Exhibit A AMENDED BUDGET - TID 1203(CENTENNIAL LAKES) Uses of Funds Land /Building Acquisition $ Expenses /Revenues $ Sources of Funds Current Budget thru 12 -31 -07 Amended Budget Tax Increment Revenue $ 90,000,000 $ 34,770,098 $ 90,000,000 Interest on Invested Funds 2,500,000 3,504,388 2,500,000 Bond Proceeds 41,400,000 33,761,677 34,400,000 Real Estate Sales 11,637,070 11,637,070 11,637,070 Special Assessments 1,321,096 - 1,321,096 Rent/Lease Revenue - - - Grants - - - Other - - - Misc. 20,000 21,799 20,000 Sale of Materials 255,710 255,710 255,710 Developer Payments 297,826 297,826 297,826 Transfers in 33,000,000 32,267,924 40,000,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 180,431,702 $ 116,516,492 $ 180,431,702 Uses of Funds Land /Building Acquisition $ 22,981,425 $ 22,981,425 $ 22,981,425 Site Imp. /Preparation 10,432,747 10,183,657 10,432,747 Public Utilities - - - Parking Facilities 8,860,000 - 8,860,000 Streets &Sidewalks - - - Park Facilities 6,578,483 6,504,773 6,578,483 Social /Recreational - - - Interest Reduction - - - Bond Principal Payments 41,400,000 22,829,724 41,400,000 Bond Interest Payments 38,000,000 33,635,357 38,000,000 Loan Principal Payments - - - Loan /Note Interest 14,684,711 4,458,855 14,684,711 Administration 1,600,000 1,326,749 1,600,000 Other - - - Parkland Dedication 2,030,345 2,030,345 2,030,345 Paid to other Govts. 42,000 33,126 42,000 Total Uses of Funds $ 146,609,711 $ 103,984,011 $ 146,609,711 District Balance (Deficiency) $ 33,821,991 $ 12,532,481 $ 33,821,991 Transfers Out $ - District Balance (Deficiency) $ 33,821,991 $ 12,532,481 $ 33,821,991 NOTES: CURRENT BUDGET LESS BOND P &l, AND NOTE INTEREST: $ 52,525,000 PROPOSED BUDGET LESS BOND P &I , AND NOTE INTEREST. $ 52,525,000 Page 3 R55CKRE-- iG20000 Check # Date 14015 111612008 Amount Supplier/ Explanation 102418 GARDENSIDE LTD 7,948.78 PROMENADE BENCHES 7,948.78 7,948.78 Grand Total CITY INA Council Check Register 1116/2008 — 11/6/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00002061 198608 26140 9132.6103 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 7,948.78 Total Payments 7,948.78 1 8 10:56:53 Page- 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 7,948.78 Report Totals 7,948.78 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 We confirm to the best of our lmnoMedge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poiicies And procedures data I. [ / L9 I ri 57 11/412008 10:56:57 Page- 1 R55CKREL G20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 14016 1111312008 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 1,372.06 SPRINKLER REPAIR 1,372.06 CITY INA Council Check Register 11113/2008 — 11/13/2008 Doc No Inv No Account No 199116 083294 9132.6103 Subledger Account Description 1,372.06 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,372.06 Total Payments 1,372.06 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 0815:28:36 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 1,372.06 Report Totals 1,372.06 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:28:40 Council Check Summary Page - 1 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pol cies rnd DrocMursw- Auto 11 I'� 0 S� . O e 1\'/ 0 \�COAPOPI'T�O� ieee MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK PROCLAD4ED NOVEMBER 17 - 23, 2008 WHEREAS, over half a million Americans will die this year from alcohol, tobacco and other drug-related causes; and WHEREAS, every person in the State of Minnesota is affected by alcohol, tobacco and other drug abuse; and WHEREAS, the human and economic costs associated with alcohol use is an estimated $4.5 billion, which amounts to more than $900 per person in Minnesota, and WHEREAS, each year smoking costs Minnesota $1.98 billion in health care costs, which amounts to $393 per person in the state; and vVHEREAS, prevention and treatment efforts have made major gains in reversing the trend toward more and more alcohol, tobacco and other drug use in our communities; and WHEREAS, alcohol, tobacco and other drug use are major factors in fires, drownings, rape and other crimes, school failure, child abuse, injury, disease, violence and lost productivity; and WHEREAS, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders are the leading cause of mental retardation in the United States, yet these disorders are 100 percent preventable; and WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service organizations, neighborhoods, youth, senior citizens, and other individuals are encouraged to demonstrate their commitment to help reduce and prevent alcohol, tobacco and other drug abuse by wearing and/or displaying the color red during Minnesota Chemical Health Week. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that November 17 - 23, 2008, be declared MINNEOSTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK throughout the City of Edina, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council Members of the City of Edina support the activities of Minnesota Chemical Health Week and the work of the Minnesota Prevention Resource Center and encourage the citizens of the City of Edina to participate in Minnesota Chemical Health Week activities and other alcohol and drug abuse prevention efforts year `round. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor r `f MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 3, 2008 7:07 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda with the exceptions of Item V.E., Metro Cities Legislative Policies — Voting Representative November 26, 2008 Policy Adoption Meeting; and, Item V.H. Set Hearing Date (November 18, 2008) — Comprehensive Plan. RollcaIL Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 21, 2008, WORK SESSION OF OCTOBER 7, 2008, AND WORK SESSION OF OCTOBER 21, 2008 APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 21, 2008, Work Session of October 7, 2008, and Work Session of October 21, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS — RICHMOND HILLS 2 "D ADDITION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS — IMP. NO. BA -343, RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -112 APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Assistant City Engineer Sullivan presented Improvement BA -343, Richmond Hills Neighborhood Reconstruction. He displayed a map to identify the location of this neighborhood and 47 single family residential homes, noting it was landlocked so the only access was Sherwood Road past Grandview Square. Mr. Sullivan presented pictures of the pavement and drainage conditions before and after the improvement. The project cost was $530,846.40, and the City utility fund would pay 44% or $234,987.49 of the project cost. The amount to be assessed was $295,858.91, which equaled $6,294.87 per residential equivalent unit. The payback was over ten years at 5.75% interest. Staff recommended approval of the special assessment per the assessment roll as presented. The Council discussed that savings were realized because the contractor was very efficient and some of the built -in costs based on rising oil and labor were not realized. It was noted that the drainage challenges in this neighborhood were addressed through curb and gutter, stormwater treatment structure, additional catch basins, and sump drains. Mr. Sullivan advised that residents addressed large low drainage areas located on interior private property. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Public Comment Steve Ullom, 5229 Richwood Drive, stated he had talked with staff about the damage to the corner of his driveway, and it was indicated that bonding could be used to make the repair; however, it had already come out. In addition, he felt the saw cut could have continued across the entire driveway if done when the blocks were removed to place the concrete forms. John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, thanked the City for a project that resulted in an assessment lower than estimated. He indicated he would like to avoid the payment of interest and requested clarification on when full payment was needed, noting the Thanksgiving holiday schedule. Jacqueline Goepfrich, 5234 Richwood Drive, asked whether residents would receive a billing or only the assessment letter. She expressed her concern for children who play in the reservoir area Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 2008 because the large catch basin was not countersunk. Ms. Goepfrich stated a tree on her property was damaged during the project and while she had received verbal assurances that a tree trimmer would look at the tree, it had not yet been addressed. Eric Hoegger, 5257 Richwood Drive, reported that the elevation of his driveway was changed and now the bottom of his wife's car scraped the pavement. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Engineer /Public Works Director Houle stated staff would work to resolve the issues with Mr. Ullom's driveway and the City Forester would inspect Ms. Goepfrich's tree; however, trimming the tree may have to be done during winter months. Mr. Houle stated staff would double -check the Hoegger driveway to determine whether the elevation needed to be changed to prevent their car from scraping. With regard, to the financing, it was explained the project was being certified to Hennepin County at the end of November to avoid 7.5% capitalized interest costs in the amount of $40,000 to $50,000 if delayed a year. To avoid interest, payment needed to be received by 4:30 p.m. on December 1, 2008. It was advised that the assessment could be paid in full, 25% of the assessment could be paid and the remainder assessed, or the full assessment could be spread over ten years on the taxes. It was noted that the assessment notice indicated an invoice would not be sent. Mr. Houle addressed the concern expressed by Ms. Goepfrich and stated he was aware that the storm water treatment structure to catch grit from the system could not be countersunk because access was needed to the manhole covers. He stated staff would consider whether other methods could be used to blend in the structure, such as artificial turf, which would still allow access for maintenance. The Council discussed that the manhole covers weigh about 150 pounds, so equipment was needed to open the covers. Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2008 -112 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONED ON VACATION OF PORTION OF BELMORE LANE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST — INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB, 6200 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD, RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -113 TABLED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mayor Hovland noted the request of the Interlachen Country Club and residents that this matter be postponed and returned to the Planning Commission to address a significant alteration. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to table consideration of Resolution No. 2008 -113 and refer the Conditional Use Permit request to build new maintenance facilities at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for the Interlachen Country Club to the Planning Commission. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *AWARD OF BID — CHAISE LOUNGES FOR EDINA AQUATIC CENTER Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by.Member Swenson awarding the bid for chaise lounges for the Edina Aquatic Center to the recommended low bidder, Taylor & Associates, Inc., at $22,476.78. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID - 2 -WHEEL DRIVE HEAVY -DUTY UTILITY VEHICLE — BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the Page 2 I `f Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 2008 bid for a 2 -wheel drive Toro Workman, Model 3200, for Braemar Golf Course to the recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing, at $16,555.87. Motion carried. on rollcall vote — five ayes. AWARD OF BID — CHANGE ORDER — MORNINGSIDE WATER MAIN PROJECT Engineer /Public Works Director Houle stated the original contract amount was $1,238,974 and Change Order #3 bfel ght it U brought it up to $200,468, exceeding more than ten percent and therefore requiring Council action. Mr. Houle advised the change orders involved the non - standard service size in the Morningside area and uniqueness of the corporation (valve connected to watermain) of a non- standard resid n ie at In ie at I service size. The other change order was for additional saddles to hold the service corporations to re- establish the service. Mr. Houle stated he may negotiate a sealcoat next summer to address the road awroad y patching that resulted from this project. The Council discussed the age of the pipes x(49 to. 69 years old) and that the technology being employed for this project had been used for sanitary sewers for 20 -30 years; however, the technology was relatively new for watermains, approved this year for use in Minnesota. Mr. Houle advised that staff and TKDA, Edina's consulting engineer, did a lot of research on this technology, noting the pipes are NSF approved to assure safety and that the project was done according to certification. Member Bennett raised questions about the suitability of this "untried" technology in these very old pipes, asked whose responsibility it was to determine the suitability, and whether the contract language contained protection for the City with regard to increasing costs. Mr. Houle described the services in the Morningside area and explained the City did not have.past records on the size of these services, nor would a consulting engineer. It was noted that the Council had been presented with several options and knew this was a new technology, and the majority voted to select this approach because it would deal with the issue in the most robust method available. Member Bennett noted that 140 people signed a petition requesting to be heard before this method was selected. Mr. Houle stated the people who came forward last fall said this was an issue they wanted addressed during the winter months. Because this type of project cannot be done during the winter months, staff understood it had to be done quickly and they recommended this technology. Mr. Houle stated this technology was a "tried and true" method, but does -they have found the method did not work with 5/8 -inch services or saddles. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, awarding the change orders, water service connections for Morningside Neighborhood Watermain Lining Project, City Contract No. ENG 08 -5, in the amount of $200,468. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. AWARD OF BID'— 2008 -2009 FIBER OPTIC CABLE INSTALLATION Assistant City Manager Worthington presented the project to continue installation of fiber optic cable and the low bid from Castrejon, Inc., who had previously done work in Edina. Ms. Worthington reviewed the bid process and identified the route that fiber optic cable would be installed to complete the City's fiber "backbone." It was noted the route most feasible closely aligned with 701h Street, providing a straighter alignment to streamline connections, and would not interfere with residential or privately owned property. Ms. Worthington advised the bids came in about $60,000 over budget. Because part of the project would be completed in 2008 and part in 2009, staff was seeking approval to utilize $275,000 allocated in the 2008 CIP and part of the $75,000 allocated in 2009. Ms. Worthington advised of the $21,000 per year cost savings to the City because lines for connectivity would no longer need to be purchased. In addition, there would be savings for voice -over internet protocol, since toll lines would not be needed. Ms. Worthington stated additional information about voice -over internet protocol would be provided to the Council in the future. The Council discussion included: benefit of running an alarm system over the network (instead of telephone lines) to connect all facilities to provide a redundant and more reliable system; the ability to Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 2008 run surveillance cameras over the network; future option to run a cellular telephone network with additional equipment; the project would build a network allowing future expansion; and, operating expenses would be saved each year. Ms. Worthington responded to Council's inquiries by explaining staff believed this was a competitive bid when compared to other bids received, and rebidding would not result in a cost savings. The Council discussed that this was an ongoing investment in the City's technology. Ms. Worthington stated the CIP allowed $75,000 per year for network facilities, plus enterprise funds could be used, (as the system goes on line) to pay the cost of equipment installed in the building. Ms. Worthington responded to Council's questions by explaining there was generally very little maintenance with the current system because it was in buried conduit and considered to be long - lasting; should there be a cut, it would have to be repaired, but that was rare; and, network maintenance was handled by the City's IT staff. It was noted this was part of the CIP the City had been operating under in five -year increments. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, awarding the bid for. ' 2008 -2009 fiber optic cable installation to the recommended low bidder, Castrejon, Inc., at $333,846.20. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — ADDITION TO MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for additions to the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement to the recommended low bidder, Software House International, at $21,954.45. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — NETWORK DATA EQUIPMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for network data equipment to the recommended low bidder, LOGIS at $23,738.90. Motion carried on rollcall vote five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -110 APPROVED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2008 -110 Accepting Various Donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2008 -09 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING REFUSE Assistant City Manager Worthington explained that legislative changes may require a change in the ordinance language. Member Bennett presented: language corrections to address clerical errors; adding language for source separated compostable materials; correctly defining refuse, municipal solid waste, compostable materials, and the containers used for yard waste; and, clarifying the timing change addressed two weeks. ago. Ms. Dianne Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, Energy and Environment Commissioner, agreed with the need for additional clarification and requested a, revision to change the pickup to every other week starting December 1, 2008. She stated the ordinance, as given first reading, contained adequate language to get the program started and suggested the language corrections be referred to the Commission. She noted the current ordinance required weekly pickup if over 60 gallons. The residents are using 64- gallon containers for source separated compostable materials, so if the container was filled, the hauler was out of compliance. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 2008 The Council discussion included: the difficulty of considering language changes without the benefit of staff and City Attorney review;, timing of consideration should the revisions be referred to the Energy and Environment Commission; and, whether second reading should be acted on as presented with the understanding that an amendment would be considered once a recommendation was received from the Commission. City Manager Hughes advised that this ordinance required publication so if considered on November 18, 2008, it would be effective upon publication on November 27, 2008. It was noted that the schedule would not allow the Energy and Environment Commission or the Recycling Solid Waste Committee an opportunity to look at the suggested changes. The Council indicated a desire to rely on the expertise of the Energy and Environment Commission. Ms. Plunkett Latham stated she saw no downside in the Council taking action on the ordinance, as presented, because it allowed the program to get started and be in compliance. Then the changes could be taken up at subsequent Commission meetings so the Commission would be better able to understand the changes being recommended, which would not ' be substantive but allow better readability of the ordinance for the public. Member Swenson made a motion to granting Second Reading to Ordinance No. 2008 -09, amending the Edina City Code Concerning Storage, Collection and Disposal of Refuse, and Compostable Materials. Mayor Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Housh Motion carried. Member Bennett stated she voted in support with the qualifier that the language being adopted was accurate but parts of the existing ordinance were inaccurate and obsolete. Member Housh stated he voted against the motion because he preferred to consider the ordinance after the language had been corrected. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -111 APPROVED TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY City Manager Hughes advised a single - family property in Edina had gone tax forfeit. The City determined there was no public purpose, so it was recommended the County be allowed to offer the property for public sale. The Council discussed that it was a rare occurrence for a single - family home to go tax forfeit and proceed to public sale. It was noted that the State of Minnesota would conduct the sale and proceeds would first cover liens by the State, then Hennepin County, and then the City. Member Housh introduced Resolution No. 2008 -111 Tax Forfeit Property. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *2009 COUNCIL MEETING DATES AND HOLIDAYS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve the 2009 Council meeting dates and holiday schedule, as submitted. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. METRO CITIES LEGISLATIVE POLICIES— VOTING REPRESENTATIVE APPOINTED NOVEMBER 20, 2008 POLICY ADOPTION MEETING Member Masica stated her appreciation for being designated the voting member to , represent Edina, encouraged attendance at this joint meeting between Metro Cities and the Minnesota League of Cities, and provided a brief overview of the policies that Metro Cities was and was not supporting. The Council discussed that Edina does not receive Local Government 'Aid (LGA); however, Metro Cities supported LGA. since many of its member cities do receive LGA. The issue of eminent domain was discussed, and the position of Metro Cities was read, noting it softened that language. Member Masica advised that at a regional level, Metro Cities had to take a stance for the majority of its member cities. Mayor Hovland made a Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 2008 motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to appoint Council Member Masica as Edina's voting representative at the Metro Cities Policy Adoption Meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE (NOVEMBER 18, 2008) SET — APPEAL ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DENIAL OF VARIANCE — SIGNAGE SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CENTER Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve setting the hearing date for an appeal of. a denial of a variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals for signage at the Southdale Medical Building, 6545 France Avenue, for the November 18, 2008, Council meeting., Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. HEARING DATES SET: 1. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VARIANCE APPEAL EDINA REALTY, 3930 49% STREET WEST (DECEMBER 16, 2008); 2. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT — GALLERIA SHOPPING CENTER (NOVEMBER 16, 2008) City Manager Hughes explained the applicant submitted a letter indicating the Edina Realty project, approved at the last meeting, also required a variance that was to be heard on November 6, 2008. However, due to the applicant's schedule, the Board of Appeals cannot consider the application until November 20, 2008, so the applicant had requested the hearing be set for a December meeting date. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve setting the hearing date for the final development plan and variance appeal of Edina Realty, 2920 49% Street West, for the December 16, 2008, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve setting the hearing date for the preliminary and final plat for the Galleria Shopping Center for the November 18, 2008, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. HEARING DATE (DECEMBER 2, 2008) SET — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Mayor Hovland advised that additional work remained on the Comprehensive Plan, so it was recommended the public hearing be rescheduled. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to schedule a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan for the December 2, Council, meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. REPORT ON CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Mayor Hovland reported the Council held three meetings to review nine categories of general performance for the City Manager. The Council used a summary performance rating scale and confirmed that Mr. Gordon was ranked in the "very good" to "outstanding" categories in all areas. It was noted that the City Manager did not receive a pay increase in 2008. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to adjust the City Manager salary by a 3.5% increase, retroactive to January 1, 2008. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *FEASIBILITY REPORT RECEIVED AND PUBLIC HEARING SET (DECEMBER 2, 2008) — RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -114 APPROVED FRANCE AVENUE SIDEWALK Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -114 receiving the feasibility study and setting December 2, 2008 for the public hearing for France Avenue Sidewalk, Improvement No. S -101. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 2008 FEASIBILITY REPORT RECEIVED — SOUND WALL — T.H. 62 AND MILLERS LANE Engineer /Public Works Director Houle presented the survey and petition results and indicated that given the response and requirement to prove direct benefit in order to specially assess a project's cost, staff recommended the project not move forward. The Council noted there was some resident confusion that MnDOT would build the sound wall for them. It was clarified that MnDOT had offered to do project design and administration, which does not mean they would construct the sound wall. The Council discussed MnDOT's system to rate highways without sound walls and that MnDOT was doing fewer projects each year. Mr. Houle advised that MnDOT only goes by their sound wall report, not by petition, so a new sound wall would only be considered if new funding was introduced at the State level or a roadway was expanded and met MnDOT's criteria. The Council noted the high rate of return on the survey, indicating 70% of the fesidents ,survey respondents were opposed to this project. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to receive feasibility report, Sound Wall T.H. 62 between Ryan Avenue and Millers Lane (north side) Improvement No. SA- 18, indicating the - project was not feasible and to not order a public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. FEASIBILITY REPORT RECEIVED — SOUND WALL — 50TH STREET AND MINNEHAHA CREEK Engineer /Public Works Director Houle presented the survey and petition results and indicated that given the response and requirement to prove direct benefit in order to specially assess a project's cost, staff recommended the project not move forward. He advised that residents were invited to submit comments, which were included in the meeting packet. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to receive feasibility report, Sound Wall, 501h Street and Minnehaha Creek (west side) Improvement No. SA -17, indicating the project was not feasible and to not order a public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 23, 2008, and consisting of 24 pages; General Fund $334,265.22; Communications Fund $6,284.18; Working Capital Fund $3,547.81; Art Center Fund $2,773.35; Aquatic Center Fund $1,810.15; Golf Course Fund $10,117.02; Ice Arena Fund $4,745.20; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $10,545.18; Liquor Fund $187,360.39; Utility Fund $99,691.14; Storm Sewer Fund $192.45; PSTF Agency Fund $1,678.90; TOTAL $663,010.99 and for approval of payment of claims dated October 30, 2008, and consisting of 36 pages: General Fund $136,891.05; Communications Fund $5,854.70; Working Capital Fund $1,927,922.02; Construction Fund $38,285.87; Art Center Fund $23,294:02; Golf Dome Fund $130.74; Aquatic Center Fund $3,703.53; Golf Course Fund $10,483.23; Ice Arena Fund $774.26; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $22,004.47; Liquor Fund $188,146.47; Utility Fund $1,711.891.07; Storm Sewer $379,358.83; PSTF Agency Fund $8,190.68; TOTAL $4,456,931.02. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Page 7 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 3, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Director of Public Works; John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director; Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer; and Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Director. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to review the draft Comprehensive Plan. The Council reviewed the "Definitions" section of the draft Comprehensive Plan and the following chapters: Introduction; Vision, Goals and Objectives; Community Profile: Population, Housing and Employment; and Land Use and Community Design. Council discussion included proper definitions in the "Definitions section;" typographical error concept of "overhousing" in Chapter 3; and developments in Chapter 4. of the terms "sustainability," "CIP" and "PUD" in Chapter 2; population projections and the desirability by the community of mixed -use The Council pointed out that graphics and tables in Chapter 3 were labeled as being comparisons of "similar communities," when they should have been labeled "adjacent communities." Staff will review the draft plan for consistency throughout the chapters. The Council revised two Land Use Policies in Chapter 4. Staff will make changes consistent with Council direction. It was noted that additional work sessions will be scheduled to complete the Council's review of the draft Comprehensive Plan. All sessions will be scheduled before the Dec. 2, 2008 public hearing. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2008 AT 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. City Manager Hughes noted that the November 4, 2008 Edina City Council Election contest for Council member had a margin of less than Y2 of one percent between the second and third vote getters. He stated that the candidate coming in third, Josh Sprague had requested the City conduct a recount per statute. Mr. Hughes explained that the City Clerk would explain the timing and location. City Clerk Mangen stated the City Council recount would begin at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, November 13, 2008. She said that teams of election judges would conduct a hand count of the voted ballots per Minnesota Statute and report the results of the recount which the Council would then canvass. The Council reviewed the results from the November 4, 2008, City Election. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Masica to accept the Report of Canvass as follows: REPORT OF CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS FOR THE CITY OF EDINA ELECTION HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2008 The Edina City Council inspected and compared the summary statements certified by the Election Judges with the General Election Returns for the City of Edina Election held on Tuesday, November 4, 2008 The votes cast were certified as follows: with James B. Hovland elected as Mayor for a four year term commencing January 6, 2009; Ann Swenson and Mary Brindle were elected to terms as Council Members for four year terms commencing January 6, 2009. GENERAL ELECTION RETURNS 2008 CITY ELECTION Pct. No Hovland Azar Thomson Volk Brindle Lonsbury Swenson Sprague 1A 999 360 59 188 430 324 642 425 113 1129 415 47 180 493 417 732 442 2 889 301 59 116 378 280 458 425 3 1235 451 59 156 439 519 765 477 4 1009 374 39 122 420 321 602 470 5 1160 533 101 184 496 468 695 579 6 1105 373 53 150 528 465 648 437 7 839 237 41 164 392 257 425 306 8 1095 350 51 153 432 428 645 419 9 966 341 68 157 449 354 562 398 10 973 324 54 149 626 366 504 332 11 1199 364 49 132 575 508 661 494 12 591 318 34 97 218 336 364 447 13 620 250 60 97 307 242 394 252 14 1097 346 88 159 421 315 593 532 15 1110 338 54 124 565 363 643 530 16 854 304 43 93 295 441 533 532 17 1117 341 77 220 536 325 722 427' 18 788 193 52 99 332 358 468 252 19 503 205 33 78 213 218 314 239 Totals 19278 6718 1121 2818 8545 7305 11370 8415 Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 6, 2008 Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, 'Swenson, Hovland Motion carried Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Page 2 i fa To: Mayor & City Council From: Joyce Repya Associate Planner REPUR Agenda Item II. A. Consent A'HUN Recommended Action: Uphold the October 16, 2008, decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Info/Background Grubb and Ellis have appealed the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to deny a signage variance for additional wall signage for tenants at the Southdale Medical Building. (See attached letter.) City Code allows only one non - retail wall sign for medical office buildings. The applicant requested four non - retail signs. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance to allow only an Urgent Care sign on the building. See attached staff reports and minutes. Information Only ❑ Date: November 18, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: An appeal of the denial of a Variance by the Zoning Board Action Motion of Appeals for signage at the Southdale Medical Building - ® Resolution 6545 France Avenue Ordinance Deadline for a City decision: December 2, 2008 F1 Discussion Recommended Action: Uphold the October 16, 2008, decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Info/Background Grubb and Ellis have appealed the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to deny a signage variance for additional wall signage for tenants at the Southdale Medical Building. (See attached letter.) City Code allows only one non - retail wall sign for medical office buildings. The applicant requested four non - retail signs. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance to allow only an Urgent Care sign on the building. See attached staff reports and minutes. RESOLUTION NO. 2008-116 RESOLUTION UPHOLDING THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN GENT CARE WALL SIGN, AND DENY ADDITIONAL TENANT WALL SIGNAGE AT THE SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CENTER 6525 & 6545 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follov ,ity of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Grubb & Ellis filed application for a variance to allow wall signs for non - retail uses in the Regional Medical District. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit 1.03 City Code Section 460.05.Subd.5 allows one building identification sign per street frontage not to exceed 50 square feet in area for office buildings up to 4 stories in height (36 square feet for additional street frontages). For buildings 5 stories in height or greater, an 80 square foot sign is allowed (40 square feet for additional street frontages.) The sign may be either wall mounted or freestanding. 1.04 In the Regional Medical District, one wall sign is allowed for each accessory retail use. Each permitted retail sign must be attached to the ground floor level and not exceed 15 percent of the ground floor wall area of the accessory retail use. 1.05 The applicant originally proposed 17 additional walls signs for tenants. 1.06 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.354, Subdivision 12, and City Code Sections 460.06 and 850.04 authorizes the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant variances and authorizes an appeal of that decision to the City Council. 1.07 On September 4, 2008 the Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on the application. Motion was made to deny the request for tenant signs. Board member Davidson suggested an amendment to the motion, to include a recommendation of approval for a variance to allow the "Urgent Care' element of the building to have additional signage. The applicant requested a continuance of the request to the October 4th meeting to allow time to modify the entire sign package. An additional continuance was requested to the October 16th, 2008 meeting. 1.08 On October 16, 2008, the applicant revised the request from 17 signs to 4 signs, including the Urgent Care sign. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information. The board considered all of the hearing testimony and the staff report, adopted Findings and approved the variance to only allow the Urgent Care sign. 1.09 Mr. Walt Van Heest of Grubb and Ellis appealed the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to the City Council. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO.2008 -116 PAGE Section 2. STANDARDS. 2.01 Section 850.04. Subd.1.F. of the City Code states that the Zoning Board of Appeals shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Section. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by this Section; (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms of this Section. 2.02 Section 460.06. Subd. 6 of the City Code states that the Board shall grant a variance from the provisions of this Section only upon finding that: (A) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zoning district; (B) the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zoning district, but which is denied to the property in question; (C) that the strict application of this Section would constitute undue hardship as defined in Section 850 of this Code; and (D) that the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zoning district in which the property is located. Section 3. THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS: 3.01 Denial of the variances, with the exception of the sign for Urgent Care, is based on the following findings: 1) There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zoning district. 2) The variances are not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zoning district, but which is denied to the property in question. 3) There is no undue hardship justifying the variances. 4) Granting variances to allow multiple tenant identification on a medical building would set a precedent for similar requests. 5) The variance would not meet the intent. of the ordinance since: a. The intent of the ordinance is to prevent sign clutter on buildings in the Regional Medical and Planned Office District. RESOLUTION NO. 2008-116 Page 3 b. The requested variance would allow four non - retail tenant signs on the buildings, when one per street frontage is allowed. 3.02 The erection of an additional building identification sign for an Urgent Care facility is reasonable. Because of the unique nature of the business it is critical that people needing urgent care find the facility easily. Section 4. CITY COUNCIL ACTION. 4.01 The City Council adopts the preceding Findings of Fact, sustains the action of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying the three sign variances, and approves the above - described variance for the Urgent Care Facility in accordance with the plans as on file at city hall, subject to the following condition: This variance will expire one year from the date of this approval, unless the city has issued a sign permit for the sign for which a variance has been granted and the sign has been erected or approved a time extension. ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 18th day of November, 2008. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 18, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day 2008. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk EXHIBIT A Parcel 1, Tract A. Registered Land Survey No, 1728, Hennepin County, Minnesota Torrens Property — Certificate of Title No. 1093782. Parcel 2, Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 1728, Hennepin County, Minnesota Torrens Property — Certificate of Title No. 1093782 Parcel 3, The East 2' /z acres of Lot 1, "Cassin's Outlots" , except that part thereof embraced in the plat of Southdale Acres. Torrens Property — Certificate of Title No. 412481 and 581758. Parcel 4, That part of Drew Ave. So., as shown and dedicated in the plat of Southdale Acres, in and for said Hennepin County, lying West of the East line of Torrens Property — Certificate of Title No. 434981 r t City of Edina Buildings; Construction and Signs 460.05 less per building per frontage Buildings more than four stories Area Identification One building identification sign per building per frontage One per develo ment signs 36 sq. ft. for each additional sign 80 sq. ft for .first 8 ft signs 40 sq. ft. for each additional sign 50 sq. ft. 8 ft. P A. Special Provisions. In the Regional Medical District only, one wall sign for each accessory retail use is permitted. Each permitted sign must be attached to the ground floor level and may not exceed 15 percent of the ground floor wall area of the accessory use. Subd. 6 Planned Industrial District. Type Building Identification Maximum Number One per building Maximum Area Maximum Height 80 sq. ft [ A. Special Provisions. In multi -tenant buildings only, one wall sign is permitted for each tenant having a private entry. The maximum sign area of each sign is 24 square feet. Subd. 7 Mixed Development District. It is the intention of this Subdivision to require that all elements of a mixed development be integrated and linked by signs that express a consistent and uniform design theme. . A. Area Identification Signs. 1. MDD -3 and MDD -4. One sign per development for each frontage not to exceed 50 square feet. 2. MDD -5 and MDD -6. One sign per development for each frontage. a. Sign Area - MDD -5 Maximum area of first sign 70 sq. ft. 460-13 Supplement 2001 -01 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Boydmast @aol.com Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008.3:2.1 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Edina Zoning Board of Appeals We support your refusal to grant variances related to 6525/6545 France Ave. S. , -Edina, Mn. BOYD AND BETTY MAST 6566 France Ave. S. #208 AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other Holiday needs. Search Now. 11/10/2008 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 16, 2008 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner RE: B- 08-46, Southdale Medical Center 6525 & 6545 France Avenue. On September 4, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard and continued the request for a sign variance to allow 17 non - retail signs for the Southdale Medical Center at 6525 -6545 France Avenue. When considering the initial request, there was a motion and second to deny the variance for 17 additional signs. Prior to the vote, one Board member stated that he believed the variance for the "Urgent Care" sign could relieve a hardship situation, and asked the proponent if they would be comfortable with an amended motion in favor of allowing only the "Urgent Care" sign. The proponent indicated that they would prefer a continuance of their request until October 0, Zoning Board meeting to allow time to complete an amended request. An additional continuance was then requested to the October 16th meeting. The revised variance request under consideration involves allowing the following four additional signs for non - retail uses: North Elevation: 1. Urgent Care 17.7 sq. ft. 2. Minnesota Orthopaedic Specialists 68.0 sq.ft. West Elevation: 3. Suburban Imaging 48.7 sq.ft. 4. Minnesota Oncology 53.3 sq.ft Staff finds that while the number of signs requested has been reduced, the conditions surrounding the amended variance request have not changed from the original request, thus denial is recommended. Attached for reference are the following materials: - Modified sign plan - Letters from the applicant, and two of the four tenants - Minutes of the Zoning Board meeting of September 4, 2008 -Staff report and attachments October 1, 2008 Joyce Repya City of Edina Planning Department 4801 W. 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Southdale Medical Center Signage Variance Dear Joyce, I am submitting on behalf of Grubb & Ellis /Northco the re additional information to support the signage variance to be heard October 16, 2008. The four requested signs are as follows: Urgent Care (north elevation) Minnesota Orthopaedic Specialists (north elevation, north wing) Suburban Imaging (west elevation, south wing) Minnesota Oncology (west elevation, south wing) Enclosed are seven sets of drawings that show the signage on the building along with the dimensions of the proposed signs. Also in the package is a letter from Minnesota Oncology that explains the need for their signage. Please contact me if you have any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Greg Fast GSR Group, Inc. 952 - 220 -2680 October 1, 2008 To: Whom it May Concern, I have attached the proposed building identification sign for Minnesota Orthopaedic Specialists. We would like the size of the wall sign to be of uniform scale to the "Fairview Crosstown Clinic" sign currently located on the building. Minnesota Orthopaedic Specialists will be providing Urgent Care functions and services until 10 pm every night. The identification sign prevents patients and families with limited mobility and immediate care needs from confusion or difficulty while attempting to find the closest entrance with direct visual access to the urgent care /clinic entrance. In summary, the features that contribute to the undue hardship and requested variance include: • Multi- tenant building with multiple entrances, without any indication of main approach for people in need of immediate attention • Building is approached from 3 streets and in different directions • Arriving patients who typically go elsewhere for care have now been redirected to our office site for urgent care and they are functioning under stressful circumstances • Urgent Care will be open until 10 pm every day and there are minimal persons about to help direct them in the evening hours • Without the proposed signage the urgent care clinic is an unidentified entity within the building that is unable to serve the needs of the community or those seeking urgent orthopedic care health services Respectfully Submitted, Owen O'Neill, MD President Minnesota Orthopaedic Specialists, P.A. MOH AIOL06T,►a. An Allili .w w US Onenla;,r October 1 2008 Karin 1. Armsrrong, M.D. Swan H. Bloom, 4LD., NI.S. Martin S. Illumcnrcich, M.D. Robot Dclaune, M.D. Philip Y. Dien, M.D. Thomas 1'. Ducker, M.D. To whom it may concern' Patrick J. Flynn, M.D. Thomas P. Flynn, M.D. Minnesota Oncology located at 6545 France Avenue South is Dan 1-1. e Call, R. XL ..1•s. Dean t -I. Gtwmc, JR. \LD. requesting a sign variance due to our specific patient population as Nicole L. Hartung, M.D. extended evening ours. We propose that this sign be P P 9 M.D. well as our 9 \rladin,ir Flugcc, I.D. Vladimir it Fl gcc. located near the actual 6545 France Avenue entrance as a way- R,hi S. Khoymtry, M.D. finding sign for patients. This is particularly important for patients F.Rru:elcws'".D• seen during ur evening hours, current) held Tuesdays and 9 9 Y Y Mi 11rona h A. Murphy. M.D. Ilrcmagh P. Murphy, M.D. Thursdays until at least 8 pm. We typically see new patients during 'Mohammed K. \ashawat), M.D. our extended hours, who have never been to our clinic before. We Domingo G. Perez, M.D. want to help ensure these new patients are able to locate our clinic Andrtej Petryk, M.D. Steven R. Rouscy, M.D. with ease. The Southdale Medical Center has become a large Mark 1). Sborov. M.D. campus with multiple buildings, entrances and parking lots. This Burton S. Schw -arm. M.D., F.A.C.P. John F. Schwerkoskc, M.D. sign will help identify which parking lot our patients should use in John E. Scrag, M.D. addition to the appropriate building entrance. r\yina K. Singh, M.D. Paul J. Thunncs, M.D. - rimothy R. Toonen, M.D. Also as an oncology clinic, many of our patients find it challenging John A. Wangcne.s, M.D. to travel long distances due to side effects such as, weakness, Eric J. Zander, M.D. M.D. Paul J. Zander, \1.D. fatigue, and nausea. In addition, we have numerous patients who C:hara Anderson, c.. \.I'• move with the aid of a walker, cane, or wheelchair. We have Jackic Collins, C.N.P. recently relocated our clinic to this building, and have had several n „�«�K� k,c N.r. 1 their frustration with having to walk !ong distances Judy A•IcEiyer,C:.N.P. patients express as a result of not being able to identify which entrance is closest to Michelle Parris, C.N.P. Alicia \\�ojchik, (:. \.1 our clinic. Cheryl L. Bailey. M.D. Locating ur clinic would continue to be an added burden to 9 Mattl,e,y P. patients without this way - finding sign due to the campus size and A. C:.•rthcrinc c:atiey, M.D. John F. Sa,.agc, NIA), multiple entrances, especially during the evening hours when there Susan McIntyre. ANY. are few people available to reference. =' I:IIn, E. Rcllairs, \1.D. Kathryn E. Farniok, M.D. Please feel free to contact me at (612) 801 -3560 if you have any Vic Liengs„ :wgwong,M.D. qquestions. Warren A. McGuire, M.D. Mark A. Palmer, M.D. Louis F. Jaulnes. M.D., F.R.C&C. \7ichele O'Brien, A.P.R.\. Suzanne Rudi, PA -C Rhonda Henschel John H. Ilra"•n, M.D. Irving J. Lerner, M.D. DON Rodger L.Johnson, M.D. Edina Practice Administrator MN Oncology Hematology, P.A. Thomas P. Flym,, �►.D. Robert Debunc, M.D. Burton S. Schwartz, M.D., F.A.C.1' Randall M. Thnmpsnn 1vu,tur„nbpn.aom Nor t'h e ' Group, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Greg Fast ph, 952 - 220 -2680 fax. 952- 941 -2266 Typestyle Frutiger Bold Product Code Customer Southdale Medical Drawing No. CopyColor Plaque Mt. Frame fi . Project Exterior Elevations North /Northwest Elevation t GraphicCode Corners Edges Date 7124/08 Scale ! IT '27s," Sign Type: revised S/2/08,913/08, PlaqueColor Frame Color Drawn By BK Appro ved 1011/08 Urgent Care Illuminated Cabinet Minnesota Orthopaedic Suer jg�e/o� cnsr p 11 ,�'{iV -S.F —%- 26" x 98" (17.69 S.F.) J� , la )C � 8 , I = !o � Sy,• �'� - . 0 lite AQW ,r '' X45 =Group, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Greg ,cast ph. 952 - 220 -2680 fax. 952- 941 -2266 - Typestyle Frutiger Bold Product Code Customer Southdale Medical Drawing No. CopyColo► Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Project Exterior Elevations Southwest Elevation GiraphlcCode Corners Edges Date 7124/08 Scale 1116"=12" Sign Type: revised 8/2/08,9/3/08, PieoueColor Frame Color _ Drawn By BK Approved 9/4 /08,10 /t /08 Suburban Imaging Minnesota Oncology Nut. �-- Draft Zoning Board Minute Summary September 4, 2008 B -08-46 Southdale Medical Center Grubbs & Ellis 6525 & 6545 France Avenue South, Edina Request: Multiple Sign Variances Staff Presentation: Planner Repya informed the Board the subject' property, Southdale Medical Center, consists of two office buildings (6525 & 6545) located east of France Avenue, west of Drew Avenue, north of W. 66th Street -and south of W. 65th Street. The property is zoned RMD, Regional Medical District. Planner Repya explained in the Regional Medical and, Planned Office District, Edina's Sign Ordinance No. 460.05, Subd, "5 provides forone building identification sign per street frontage; not to exceed 5�0 square feet in area for office buildings up to 4 stories in height (36 square feet for additional street frontages). For buildings 5 stories, in height or greater,, an-,'80 square foot sign is allowed (40 square feet for additional street'frontages.) The sign may be either wall mounted or freestanding. Additionally, only in the Regional Medical District, one wall sign is allowed for each accessory retail use.' Each permitted retail sign must be attached to the ground floor level and not exceed 15 percent of the ground floor wall area of the accessory retail use. Continuing, Planner Repya -told the Board the proposed variance request involves allowing seventeen additional" signs for non - retail uses — Fifteen signs on; the first floor of 6545 France Avenue and two signs on 6525 (one on the first floor, and one on the second floor.) Variances from the Sign Ordinance have been previously approved for both the 6525 and 6545 buildings. Planner Repya concluded, staff recommends denial of the variance to allow additional signs for non - retail uses based on the following findings: 1) There' is not a unique hardship to the property. 2) Granting variances to allow multiple tenant identification on a medical building would set a precedent for similar requests. 3) Variances to allow additional signage to assist patients in way finding have been granted for this site. The variance does not meet the intent of the ordinance based on the following: a. The intent of the ordinance is to prevent sign clutter on buildings in the Regional Medical and Planned Office District. b. The requested variance would allow seventeen non - retail tenant signs on the buildings, when one per street frontage is allowed. Appearing for the Applicant: Mr. Bruce Carlson, Grubbs & Ellis was present representing the ownership. Representatives were also present for the four medical clinics seeking sign identification variances. Board Member Comments and Concerns: Member Scherer asked Planner Repya to clarify the number of variances Southdale Medical Center received in the past and the number requested this evening. Member Repya responded in the past Southdale Medical Center received variance approval for 7 signs. This evening they are requesting 17 sign variances. If Southdale Medical Center receives approval this evening the total number of approved sign variances would be 24. Member Vasaly asked Ms. Repya the difference in Code requirements between retail and non - retail. Planner Repya responded provisions in the Code recognize that retail uses such as a pharmacy, gift andlor coffee, shops, are common elements found in a medical setting that merit additional signage. Member Vasaly questioned that provision and asked Planner Repya if she knows the history behind the Code allowing retail signage in a medical setting. Planner Repya said the Code was written before she came to work for the City, adding she doesn't know the history:, Apolicant Presentation: Mr. Bruce Carlson addressed the Board and stated he is here this evening along with a number of representatives for key medical clinics, adding the variance request is also in response to their leasing needs. Continuing, with graphics Mr. Carlson addressed each sign and its location explaining to Board Members that since 1991 Southdale Medical Center has added over 100,000 square feet of space which requires additional signage to navigate the site and aid in finding the correct entrance. Mr. Carlson said in a sense the proposal presented this evening can be viewed as, a "master signage plan ". Mr. Carlson stressed to the Board the importance, of way finding, pointing out Edina's population is aging and meeting the needs of an aging population is important. Mr. Carlson distributed materials to the Board and stated the submitted "master sign plan" addresses the needs of an aging population, it also affords uniform exterior visibility, and allows signage for the larger clinical uses within the medical center. Mr.. Carlson pointed out the additional square footage has created space 2 for new clinical tenants, adding terms of their lease indicate exterior signage. Continuing, Mr. Carlson pointed out if the clinical tenants were retail uses, not medical, signage would be allowed, adding in his opinion the line is blurring between what is retail and what isn't. Member Vasaly stated she understands the request; however, doesn't understand the hardship. Mr. Carlson responded Southdale Medical Center is a large complex, with multiple entrances, multiple street frontages, multiple elevators that shouldn't be compared (as staff mentioned in the staff report) to the Titus Building or other similar buildings, adding it's unique. Mr. Carlson stated if the Board approves this variance a precedent would not be set. Member Scherer noted Mr. Carlson's reference to "four" new tenants and asked if these tenants have their own entrances. Mr Carlson responded they do not have their own entrances. Member Davidson noted that on the plans presented one of the signs indicates "Urgent Care ", adding he believes it's important to have the Urgent Care sign visible day and night, for way finding. Mr. Carlson agreed. Continuing, Member Davidson asked Mr. Carlson if the building- attracts many``walk -in" patients, pointing out usually medical facilities `are destination and road based. Mr. Carlson.said this medical center is a' :'hub ", adding many visitors are referrals from within the building and from near.buildings like Fairview Southdale Hospital, etc., adding in a way they are walk- ins ". Dr. Owen McNeil addressed the Board and explained -,he represents the new orthopedic urgent care tenant. Dr: O'Neil reported his practice is moving from 7373 France, to the. subjecfbuilding, adding it is very important that urgent care has exterior signage. Continuing, Dr. O'Neil stressed how important it is for his patients to easily find urg6nt,care."'He pointed out patients that need urgent care are in'pain and already are stressed, adding making way finding easier eases their stress which is very important. br. O'Neil- pointed out to the Board that the orthopedic urgent care is also open during the evening hours making:visible signage very important. Member Davidson asked Dr. O'Neil how late urgent care is open. Dr. O'Neil said at this time they believe their clinic will be open to at least 10 PM, possibly midnight. Ms. Tammy Thomas told'ttie Board she represents a future building tenant adding she believes -the Board should know how important way finding is. Ms. Thomas said one of the first things patients ask is "how do I get there" and if they have difficulties in finding their destination they question signage. Continuing, Ms. Thomas. reiterated the importance of directing people to the right office noting a majority of patients are the elderly and if they experience difficulty in finding their doctors' office their stress levels elevate. Ms. Thomas also informed the Board many of their patients are not from the general area, and many face language challenges so signage becomes everything. Concluding, Ms. Thomas asked the Board to support the request, again reiterating how important signage is. A representative from Suburban Imaging, a radiology practice told the Board the imaging clinic is open from 7 AM —11 PM and this facility is a very important diagnostic tool not only for Southdale Medical Center, but for the general area. He told the Board one of the problems with Southdale Medical Center is that there are so many doors, adding he believes the hardship is visibility. The Board was further informed that Suburban Imaging can see upwards of 20 patients a day that do 'walk in off the street ", reiterating the importance of signs directing patients to the right building, right door. Board Member Comments: Chair Schroeder thanked Mr. Carlson and tenant representatives for their input. Chair Schroeder asked for clarification on the schematic and if under the proposed first floor clinic identification signs there is an entrance, adding if there isn't that could cause confusion. Continuing, Chair Schroeder stated in his opinion more signs add clutter, not clarification. Chair Schroeder said Southdale Medical continues to have four entrances, and good street exposure, reiterating in his opinion, too many signs would cause more confusion. Member Vasaly made the observation that in her opinion, the Ordinance doesn't make a lot of sense in differentiating between retail and non - retail in the medial zoning district; however, "as presented she believes there is no hardship and too many signs would only add to,clutter and confusion. Member Vasaly suggested that the applicant approach the Council for an amendment to the Code as it relates to retail vs. non - retail signage. Concluding, Member Vasaly said the arguments presented by the applicants,this evening make sense, but they should be,eddressed at the code level, not through the variance process. A discussion ensued between Board Members with Board Members acknowledging that the building has increased in size over the past 15 years; however, certain key elements haven't changed including the number of entrances and street visibility, coupling that with past approved sign variances approving 17'additional signs would only add to site confusion and clutter. Board Action: Member Vasaly moved denial of B -08-46 based on staff findings. Member Scherer seconded the motion. Member Davidson told Board Members he can't support the majority of the requested sign variances; however, in his opinion it is very important that the In urgent care clinic has proper signage. Member Davidson suggested an amendment to the motion for denial to include a recommendation of approval for a variance allowing the urgent care element of the building to have additional signage. Member Davidson reiterated he cannot support the other sign variances requested in the sign package, but can support a variance approving a sign for the urgent care tenant. Member Vasaly and Member Scherer accepted that am; mendment:, Member Vasaly commented if she understands State Statues correctly variance approval can be for less than what was requested but not more. Mr. Carlson addressed the Board and told them it is very important that all four , clinics have signage, not only the orthopedic urgent care clinic. Mr. Carlson asked the Board if they would modify their amendment to, include all'four clinics. Mr. Carlson said his objective this evening was approval of a, "master plan" which included signage for the four clinic tenants. Member Vasaly stated the amendment was only for the urgent care \element, not the other three clinics, adding she is comfortable with -the amendment to include the urgent care component, but not the other three clinics. Chair Schroeder addressed Mr. Carlson and suggested that either the Board acts on the motion on the table or the master sigriage plan is withdrawn allowing time to modify the sign package. Mr. Carlson asked the Board to table their request allowing them additional time to modify theirsignage package. A brief discussion ensued with regard to the date for the public hearing. Mr. Carlson said-he believes October 2 "d is best. Member Vasaly withdrew her motion. Member Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Member Scherer moved to table B -08-46 to October 2, 2008. Member Vasaly seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 5 Zoning Board Minutes October 16, 2008 B -08-46 Grubb & Ellis Southdale Medical Center 6525 & 6545 France Avenue, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Repya told the Board on September 4;2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard and continued the request for a sign variance to allow 17 non - retail signs for the Southdale Medical Center at 6525 =6545 France Avenue. Planner Repya explained that when consideri ng the initial request, there was a motion and second to deny the variance for 17 additional signs: Prior to the vote, one Board member stated that he believed the variance for the "Urgent Care" sign could relieve a hardship situation, and asked the proponent if they would be comfortable with an amended motion in favor. of allowing only the "Urgent Care" sign. The proponent indicated that they would prefer a continuance of their request until October 4t' Zoning Board meeting to allow time to complete an amended request. An additional continuance was then requested to the October 16th meeting. Planner Repya said the revised variance request under consideration involves allowing the following four additional signs for non - retail uses: Urgent Care, Minnesota Orthopedic Specialists, Suburban Imaging and Minnesota Oncology Concluding Ms. Repya said staff finds that while the number of signs requested has been reduced, the conditions surrounding the amended variance request "have not changed from the original request, thus denial is recommended. ADDearina for Aoolicant- Dennis Zylla; Grubb & Ellis. Board Questions and Comments Chair Grabiel asked for clarification on the retail signage component allowed by Code in the Regional Medical District. Planner Repya explained Code permits retail identification signs on the first floor of a medical office building. Planner Repya noted the Code recognizes that support elements such as a pharmacy, uniform store, optical store, and restaurant benefit a medical building. Continuing, Planner Repya said Code 460 contains a "Special Provisions" clause for the Regional Medical District only that allows one wall sign (ground floor only) for each accessory retail use. Applicant Presentation and Tenant Comments Dennis Zylla, representing Grubb & Ellis, addressed the Board and explained he was the development manager for the 6525 building expansion and in his private life served on the City of Plymouth's Planning Commission, adding he is familiar with variance criteria. Continuing, Mr. Zylla said the. hardship criteria established by Code is difficult to justify from a sign standpoint. Mr. Zylla stated he believes the request is reasonable. Mr. Zylla reported the tenant lease -permits signage, adding the hours of operation for these four tenants are extended; not the normal 9 to 5. Mr. Zylla pointed out that 1St floor retail"signage already exists on the building and in his opinion the "character' won't,be altered because of the- request. Mr. Zylla noted if the four new "uses" were, retail, not medical, exterior signs would be permitted; reiterating the character of the building wouldn't be compromised. Concluding, Mr. Zylla asked the Board to note,that the request presented this evening eliminates a nurrmber of signswhich were.depicted in the original request and were of concern to the, past Board.` Dr. Sborov, Oncologist, told the Board it is very important thathis patients easily find his office. Dr. Sborov explained that he has extended' evening hours, reiterating adequate signage is very, important. Dr. -Sborov noted many of his patients are already stressed and if they cannot find the right office it can become very stressful Mr. Bob Starosta,__Suburban , lmaging, told the Board their office is usually open from 11 AIVI _ until 11 PM-, six days,a week: _ Mr. Starosta said their office has received a number of complaints from patients who have had difficulty finding the correct office, adding additional signagewould aid with way finding. Especially after hours when portions on the building are chained. off. Dr. Kelly stated it is very important that the urgent care clinic is adequately. signed. Dr. Kelly said after,regular business hours it can be difficult to navigate the building if one, accidently goes in the wrong door, adding there are areas in the building that are cordoned off. Board Member Comments Member Winder stated she has concerns with this request. She questioned if the issue is more with the management of the building, or would this request be better served through a Code amendment. Member Nelson said he agrees with the comment from Member Winder that this request would be better addressed through an ordinance amendment. Member Nelson pointed out there are a number of similar medical office buildings in Edina and if this request is approved others could request similar variances. Concluding, Member Nelson stated his struggle is with identifying a hardship. Chair Grabiel asked how ground floor medical offices are handled by Code, and questioned how the Code came about. Planner Repya responded she believes the Code may have been written to accommodate this building. Planner Repya said originally the first floor of the building contained a restaurant, optical, bank, pharmacy and a uniform store. The exterior signage accommodated those retail uses that were frequented by both internal patients and the outside public. Chair Grabiel pointed out if this variance is granted first floor medical offices would be treated differently than third floor medical offices, questioning what the difference is. Planner Repya responded there isn't any difference between a third and first floor medical office suite. Mr. Zylla interjected and stated he believes these four, medical offices have different circumstances, their patient mix and hours of operation. Chair Grabiel said if patients have difficulty navigating the interior of the building he believes that is a management issue. Chair Grabiel commented that in his opinion it is important that the urgent care clinic is signed, but -the others really are no different than other medical offices in the building on different floors. Mr. Zylla informed the Board that for many elderly, patients the site is confusing adding their request this evening is only for additional signage for the four medical uses, not 17 signs as previously requested in the "master" sign plan. Member Winder said in her'opinion medical offices aren't the same as a Starbucks. Member Winder added most patients have an appointment and the ability to phone ahead to get directions. Member Winder said in her opinion, if way finding isn't a management problem this should be reviewed at the Council level through an amendment to the Code that would permit 1 st floor medical offices signage. Dr Kelly reiterated how important it is for the orthopedic urgent care to have a sign. Chair Grabiel stated he makes a distinction between the urgent care office and the other medical offices, adding in his opinion an urgent care office requires exterior signage. Continuing, Chair Grabiel noted every identification issue that applies to the three medical offices requesting a sign variance could also apply to all other medical offices in the building regardless of their location. Chair Grabiel acknowledged that it is difficult to sit on the Zoning Board and realize a hardship and this request is no different. Chair Grabiel said he believes the way finding problem could be addressed through management by adding more interior way finding signs or some other means of way finding. Chair Grabiel said another tool may be for the City Council to approve an amendment to Code that would allow exterior signage on the first floor elevation of a medical building for all uses, office and retail. Concluding, Chair Grabiel reiterated he supports exterior signage for the urgent care element of the proposal, but cannot support a signage variance for the other three medical office uses. Member Nelson told the Board he agrees with all comments made this evening by Board Members. Member Nelson noted the Board is charged -with measuring hardship and in this instance a hardship hasn't been identified. Board Action Member Winder moved that the variance request'be denied except for the, Urgent Care office. Denial is based on staff finding&. yMember Nelson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion; carried. The applicant was advised of their right to appeal the decision of\the-Zoning Board to the City Council. J i i� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # B- 08- 46 Joyce Repya September 4, 2008 6525 & 6545 France Associate Planner Ave. Brief Description: Variances to allow more than one non - retail wall sign for a medical office building. The applicant is proposing, seventeen non - retail signs. (See narrative and plans on pages Al— Al2.) Recommended Action: Denial of the variance request. Introduction /Background: The subject property, Southdale Medical Center, consists of two office buildings (6525 & 6545) located east of France Avenue, west of Drew Avenue, north of W. 66th Street and south of W. 65th Street. The property is zoned RMD, Regional Medical District. In the Regional Medical and Planned Office District, Edina's Sign Ordinance No. 460.05, Subd. 5 provides for one building identification sign per street frontage not to exceed 50 square feet in area for office buildings up to 4 stories in height (36 square feet for additional street frontages). For buildings 5 stories in height or greater, an 80 square foot sign is allowed (40 square feet for additional street frontages.) The sign may be either wall mounted or freestanding. Additionally, only in the Regional Medical District, one wall sign is allowed for each accessory retail use. Each permitted retail sign must be attached to the ground floor level and not exceed 15 percent of the ground floor wall area of the accessory retail use. The proposed variance request involves allowing seventeen additional signs for non - retail uses — Fifteen signs on the first floor of 6545 France Avenue and two signs on 6525 (one on the first floor, and one on the second floor.) Variances from the Sign Ordinance have been previously approved for both the 6525 and 6545 buildings. In 2003, the 6525.building received a variance to allow four additional building identification signs to reduce confusion and assist in way finding. (See minutes on pages A13 — A14.) In 2004, the 6545 building received a variance to allow three additional building identification signs to again reduce confusion and assist in way finding. (See minutes on pages A15 — A17.) Primary Issue • Is the requested variance justified? No. As demonstrated below, staff believes the variance criterion has not been met. Per Section 460.07.Subd. 6, the Board shall grant a variance from the provisions of this Section only upon finding that: 1) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zoning district; There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances with this property. The building has good visibility from adjacent roadways, avid it is well signed. As mentioned, variances have been granted to allow 7 non - retail wall signs. If variances were granted to allow additional signage, including the names of medical clinics within the building, it would set a precedent for other similar medical and /or office buildings in town. Examples of similar medical building sites, where similar requests could be made, would be the Centennial Lakes medical building at 7373 France Avenue, the Eberhardt building at 3250 West 66th Street, the Titus Building at 6550 York Avenue, and the new Crosstown Medical building at 4010 West 65th Street. The intent of the ordinance requirement is to prevent sign clutter on buildings in the Regional Medical and Planned Office District. 2) The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zoning district, but which is denied to the property in question; With the exception of the variances that were granted previously to improve way finding on the site, there have not been variances granted at other sites that would allow additional tenant signage on medical buildings. As mentioned above, to allow this additional signage would set a precedent for similar requests. 3) That the strict application of this Section would constitute undue hardship as defined in Section 850 of this Code. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F, of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests: a. Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? No. As mentioned there are no practical difficulties that prevent reasonable use. The building has good visibility from France, 65t' and 66th Street. Variances have already been granted on the site to improve way finding on the site. The existing signage is reasonable for the site. b. Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? No. Staff does not believe there are unique circumstances to allow individual medical tenants to have signage on the exterior of the building. C. Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The variances would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Buildings do have wall signage in the area. However, individual medical clinics typically do not have exterior wall signage. 4) That the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zoning district in which the property is located. The proposed signs would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the variance to allow additional signs for non - retail uses. Denial is based on the following findings: 1) There is not a unique hardship to the .property. 2) Granting variances to allow multiple tenant identification on a medical building would set a precedent for similar requests. 3) Variances to allow additional signage to assist patients in way finding have been granted for this site. 4) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The intent of the ordinance is to prevent sign clutter on buildings in the Regional Medical and Planned Office District. b. The requested variance would allow seventeen non - retail tenant signs on the buildings, when one per street frontage is allowed. Surrounding Land Uses Fairview Southdale Hospital to the north, Southdale Center to the south, Point of France Condominiums and a one story office building to the west, and Regional Medical District offices to the east. Existing Site Features The subject property is 9 acres in size, and contains 2 medical office buildings. Planning Guide Plan designation: RIVID - Regional Medical District Zoning: RMD - Regional Medical District Grubbr.Elliso j Rai E= S ims Pmpeny sc"m worWide APP Ll M-PT okwl V E EXHIBIT A August 6. 2008 MASTER EXTERIOR SIGNAGE PLAN SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CENTER CAMPUS 6545 and 6525 France Avenue South VARIANCE REQUEST SUMMARY OF THE RATIONALE FOR THE VARIANCE REOUEST Southdale Medical Center has created a Master Exterior Signage Plan for signage to be implemented for all buildings on the 9 -Acre site that comprise the Southdale Medical Center Campus (6545 and 6525 France Avenue South). The owner, France Avenue Medical LLC and SMB Operating Company LLC (subsidiaries of Investors Real Estate Trust), believes this plan embraces the current trends in newer medical facilities designed to create more patient friendly environments. It also recognizes the fact the Southdale Medical Center Complex is the largest Medical Office Building in the Twin Cities with multiple wings and additions that make it unique and different from single structure medical facilities. Several new and important clinical tenants were granted the right in their lease agreements (subject of course to city approval) to have exterior signage on the building. These tenants regard visibility as critical to their practices. These tenants are Suburban Imaging, Minnesota Oncology and Hematology Associates (MOHPA), Minnesota Orthopedic Surgeons, and the Fairview Breast Center Specifically, this Master Exterior Signage Plan addresses the following objectives: 1. The Master Exterior Signage Plan allows for the larger and more prominent clinical uses within the Southdale Medical Center to have an exterior visible community presence within the larger medical campus. 2. The Master Exterior Signage Plan is created to complement the aesthetic appearance and design of the existing and new buildings. 3. It allows for uniform exterior visibility that evokes the key health care mission and services offered within the various buildings. 4. I continues the previously approved practice of permitting exterior clinical signage in a manner that is consistent with the existing Fairview / Crosstown Clinic and Med Search signs. 5. It improves way finding on a "building wing" by "building wing" basis within the rapidly expanding and somewhat confusing Fairview Southdale Campus, of which Southdale Medical is a key part. A -i 6. This plan respects the need for an aging patient population to easily visualize how to drive to, park, and conveniently visit the 70 clinical, diagnostic and treatment facilities at Southdale Medical with its 4 major entrances, multiple parking lots and ramps. 7. This Plan also respects and reflects some of the signage practices already allowed by variance from the Edina Codes that have been implemented with city approval by Fairview Health Systems North of 65h Street. 8. The current Edina ordinance allows for accessory retail uses to have exterior signage. Currently there are 4 retail uses within the two buildings. Only 2 of these have exterior signage privileges at this tune. The variances requested would allow the management of the building to include key clinical uses on exterior signs in the approved locations only. 9. It is intended that the Master Exterior Signage Plan would set a maximum for the number and size of exterior signs and all accessory retail uses would be included within the maximum number. VARIANCE REQUEST Approval for this signage variance is requested on a comprehensive basis. It will allow the owner of the building to exercise some discretion over which major clinical and diagnostic facilities should have exterior signage at Southdale Medical in order to better serve the patient needs. 6545 FRANCE The concept for 6545 FRANCE is to provide for 6 exterior signage band areas on the North and South wings of the building and 4 exterior signage bands on the East wing, arranged in a symmetrical and orderly basis as shown on the attached elevations as follows: • Two clinical or retail signs (one in each bay) on either side of the main entrance to the North and South wings. • Three clinical or retail signs (one in each bay) on the Ends of The North and South wings of the building. • One clinical or retail exterior sign on the North and South end caps. • An URGENT CARE sign on the North end cap. • Four retail or clinical signs on the Southerly face of the East Wing. 6525 FRANCE The current allowances for exterior signage locations on the 6525 FRANCE Building would be increased to permit two new clinical or retail signs of landlords choosing, also arranged in a symmetrical way as shown on the attached elevations. A -'L =Group, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Greg Fast ph. 952 - 220 -2680 fax. 952- 941 -2266 Typestyle Product Code Customer. Southdale Medical Drawing No. CopyColor Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Project Main Level & Tunnel Walkways Main Level & Tunnel Walkways GraphicCode Comers Edges Date 8 12108 Scale Sign type: 812108 PlaqueColor Frame Color. Drawn By t3K Approved O W ` W > �r1 1=- W U Z Q o< U- Exhibit 6 WEST 65TH M I ij ! I I I illifflil i ,C I K STREET 0 EXISTIN( 3 STOV ADDITION I CXI' -MNG 6 S!OKY MaCAL OFFtU BLDG E4 — i , v E a i rrNl WFST k 6 T H STRFFT = Walkways & Tunnel ---------- - - - - -- PARKING RAMP 'I— O V) W Z ff W Q I� o< 0 SIGN VARIANCE REQUESTS SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CENTER 6525 & 6545 France Ave. So. 6525 North Wall — W. 65th St. 1. Medical Clinic (tbd) —1St Floor 2. Medical Clinic (tbd) — 2 "d Floor 6545 North Wall — W.65 1h St. 3. Urgent Care 4. 6525 / arrow & tenant identification 5. 6545 / arrow & tenant identification 6. Minnesota Orthopedic Surgeons West Wall — France Ave. 7. Medical Clinic (tbd) 8. Medical Clinic (tbd) 9. Medical Clinic (tbd) 10. Medical Clinic (tbd) 11. Medical Clinic (tbd) 12. Medical Clinic (tbd) South Wall — W. 66h St. 13. Medical Clinic (tbd) South Wall — W. 66h St. — East end 14. Medical Clinic (tbd) 15. Southdale Medical Center — 6545 16. Medical Clinic (tbd) 17. Medical Clinic (tbd) ,q L� v r zoo 3 Va,r, "e-e- W:?A..J .V =Group, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Greg Fast ph. 952 - 220 -2680 fax. 952- 941 -2266 Typestyle Product Code Customer Southdale Medical Drawing No. North/ Northeast Elevation CopyColor Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Comers Edges Project Exterior Elevations Date 7 /24108 Scale Sign Type: revised 8 -2 -08 GraphlcCode PlaqueColor Frame Color Drawn By BK Approved V- loo -`5 Vart "d-e- e ' . -tp, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 G), ?ast ph. 952 - 220 -2680 fax. 952- 941 -2266 PV 4F5� v Typestyle Product Code Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Customer Southdale Medical Project Exterior Elevations Drawing No. North /Northwest Elevation CopyCo/or _ GraphlcCode Corners Edges Date 7/24/08 Scale Sign Type: revised s -2 -o8 PlaqueColor Frame Color Drawn 8y BK Approved Y : Zoo q vw an m 1-05#5 W Y ° ; ; Group, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Greg Fast ph. 952 -220 -2680 fax. 952 - 941 -2266 Typestyle Product Code Customer Southdale Medical Drawing No. CopyColor Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Project Exterior Elevations Northwest Elevation GraphicCode Corners Edges Date 7/24/08 Scale Sign type: revised s -2 -o8 PlaqueColor Frame Color Drawn By BK Approved Y = 2(-W ^;f Iva rIa #1 rI (005W-5 w t. ap, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Gi past ph. 952 - 220 -2680 fax. 952 - 941 -2266 G � Typestyle Product Code Customer Southdale Medical Drawing No. J CopyColor Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Pro /ect Exterior Elevations Southwest Elevation GraphicCode Corners Edges Date 7/24/08 Scale Sign Type: revised 8 12/08 PlaqueColor Frame Color Drawn By BK Approved -ice -I ��{�.. � •'5 -.- . r ",. A V = 2 &O t V" c Qil't CZ-1 0646 s ® Group, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Greg Past ph. 952 - 220 -2680 fax. 952- 941 -2266 ,/' /� Typestyle Product Code Customer Southdale Medical Drawing No. v� �n"� CopyColor Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Project Exterior Elevations South /Southwest Elevation GraphicCode Corners Edges Date 7/24/08 Scale Sign type: revised 812108 PlaqueColor Frame Color Drawn 8y LiK Approved (545ffC� J ap, Inc. P.O. Box 390416 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Gi, .past ph. 952- 220 -2680 fax. 952- 941 -2266 Typestyle Product Code Customer Southdale Medical Drawing No. uL CopyColor Plaque Mt. Frame Mt. Project Exterior Elevations South /Southeast Elevation GraphicCode Corners Edges Date 7/24/08 Scale Sign Type: revised 8/2/08 P/aqueCo/or Frame Color Drawn By BK Approved k' A 6 \�a__. 1. 0 A-v2 zoning, board meeting March 6, 2003 B -03 -15 Northco Real Estate Services — Southdale Medical 6525 France Avenue Request: . Building Identification Sign Variances Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is a new medical office building fronting West 65th Street located on the north side of the Southdale Medical Building. Ms. Aaker explained Edina's Sign Ordinance No. 460 provides for one building identification sign per street frontage. The sign may not exceed 50 square feet in area; however, it may either be a wall sign or monument sign. Because the subject building has only one street frontage on West 65th'street a single sign, wall or monument is allowed. Ms. Aaker told the Board the proponent has requested a variance to permit four signs to identify the subject building. The proponent has explained that the request for three additional building identification signs is precipitated by the need to reduce confusion and relieve sign distance problems created by the mature landscaping and the large building setback from West 65th street/France Avenue intersection. Ms. Aaker concluded staff finds that the signage needs in the Regional Medical District are often unique, and not fully addressed in the City's sign code, and best reviewed on an individual basis through the variance process. The proposed sign package does a good job of reducing confusion and providing better visibility in a high traffic area where quick decisions often need to be made. Furthermore, the proposed signs are not excessively large and approval of these variances would not be inconsistent with the variances previously awarded in the Regional Medical District. Mr. Dennis Zylla, and Bruce Carlson were present representing Northco Real Estate Services. A discussion ensued between board members with members in agreement the requested signage is needed to afford the site less confusion and more visibility. However, board members told the proponents if approved this variance "maxes out" the site with regard to signage. A 15 Mr. Brown moved variance approval subject to the sign plans presented this evening and that the proponents go through the sign permit process with the City. Mrs. Utne seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. ,q 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA ZONING BOARD Thursday, December 16, 2004, 5:30 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Helen McClelland, Ann Swenson, Mike Lewis, Ed Schwartzbauer and Rod Hardy STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the October 21, 2004 meeting were filed as submitted. II. NEW BUSINESS: B -04 -67 Grubb & Ellis /Northco 6545 France Avenue Request: Additional Building Identification Signs Ms. Repya told the board the subject property is the original Southdale Medical office building at the intersection of France Avenue and West 66th Street. The building is one of the two buildings making up the Southdale Medical Center. In 2003 the second building (6525) was constructed to the north. At that time variances were granted to allow additional building identification signs to clear up confusion between the two buildings. Ms. Repya explained the proponent believes the request for three additional building identification signs is precipitated by the need to reduce confusion and relieve sight distance problems created by the mature landscaping and the large building setback along France Avenue. Ms. Repya said staff finds the signage needs in the Regional Medical District are often unique, not fully addressed in the City's side code, and best reviewed on an individual basis through the variance proves. Ms. Repya concluded the additional address numerals in the proposed sign package do a good job of reducing confusion with the 6525 building and providing a better visibility in a very high traffic area. However, the " Southdale Medical Center" sign that includes the logo and measures 165 square feet in A 15 area appears to be excessive. Staff recommends limiting the variance to include only the text, deleting the log, thus providing an additional 45 square foot sign. Mr. Dennis Zilla, Northco was present to respond to questions. Chair McClelland asked if the entire complex is considered Southdale Medical. building. Mr. Zilla responded the new building (6525) is connected to the existing medical building and both are now considered the Southdale Medical Center. Mr. Zilla addressed the board and explained he has worked with staff to further reduce their signage needs. Originally more signage was preferred but in speaking with staff it was realized changes were required to bring the proposal more into compliance with the City sign code. Mr. Schwartzbauer asked if the proposed logo is an important element. Mr. Zilla responded the logo is important, adding he understands if the board is uncomfortable with the logo. Mr. Zilla stated their first priority is to eliminate confusion between buildings. He added while the buildings are physically connected they are "separate ". Mr. Hardy asked if the original building is signed. Mr. Zilla responded building identification is located on the west canopy. Which is the "main" entrance to that building. Mr. Hardy said in his opinion it is important to reduce confusion adding he has no problem with introducing numerals and the name of the facility but questioned the need to have a building identification sign with logo Mr. Zilla said in his opinion the logo provides a more finished look to the main building tower. Mr. Hardy questioned if the logo incorporates the name of the buildings thereby eliminating the need for the words "Southdale Medical Center'. Mr. Zilla said the proposed logo is just being introduced, and would not be easily recognized as "Southdale Medical Center" by the public. Mr. Zilla reiterated he understands their reluctance concerning the logo and stated it is important to have the wording "Southdale Medical Center" on the facade of the main building tower. Chair McClelland stated she has no problem regarding the request for additional numerals adding pedestrian and vehicle confusion in this area needs to be reduced. Chair McClelland questioned if the sign code should be re- visited by the City Council especially as it relates to address numerals particularly in the Regional Medical District. She concluded that is something the Council may want to address in the future. Mr. Hardy said in his opinion it is critical that traffic and pedestrian flow work on this site and additional building identification is warranted. He added he A ga also understands the reason for introducing the logo, but isn't sure that reason is a necessary element of this proposal: He concluded it is clear something needs to be done on this campus to "tie" the buildings to each other. Mrs. Swenson asked Mr. Zilla if the building identification number on the top of the building (6545) would be illuminated. Mr. Zilla responded presently they are not illuminated. He added he would like the ability to illuminate the numbers, but electrical access needs to be verified. Mr. Hardy commented in Minnesota at least 40% of the time it is dark and in his opinion the numbers should be illuminated. Mrs. Swenson questioned if the numbers are illuminated, would they remain illuminated 24 hours a day. Ms. Repya responded illuminated signage is to be turned off at 10 PM. Face lit signage is usually wired to include a timer. Mr. Schwartzbauer asked Mr. Zilla if the proposed logo is illuminated. Mr. Zilla said the logo is not illuminated. It is an identification feature. A discussion ensued between board members with regard to the proposal with the board in agreement additional identification signage is needed but the board could not support the proposed logo. The board also indicated the Council should review the sign ordinance especially as it relates to address identification in all zoning districts. Mr. Lewis moved variance approval of #5,.1, #1.1. and #6.1 (photo plans) with illumination turned off at 10 PM. Mr. Lewis noted the uniqueness of this site and the demands that are present in the City's Regional Medical districts. Mr. Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Mr. Hardy also suggested if the Council revisits the sign ordinance the ratio of numbers to building wall should be studied. Chair McClelland agreed she pointed out the way the City's sign code presently reads address numbers can "eat up" the allowed signage leaving little or no room for building or corporate name. III. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:15 PM Jackie Hoogenakker A r� To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director KEFUKUKPC:UMMEN VATIUN Agenda Item II.B Consent Recommended Action: Approve the Preliminary & Final Plat for the Galleria Shopping Center. Info/Back ,ground The applicant is proposing a plat to create separate lots for the Crate & Barrel and Gabbert's stores and their associated parking areas. (See page A6.) There would be no additions to any existing structures to accommodate this request (See the Planning Commission staff report and the proposed lots within the galleria site on pages Al -A6.) . Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission unanimously approved the Galleria Registered Land Survey date stamped September 26, 2008. (See minutes on page A7.) Information Only Date: November 18, 2008 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: Preliminary & Final Plat at the Galleria Shopping Center Action ® Motion - 3501 Galleria ® Resolution Deadline for a City decision: January 20, 2008 Ordinance F1Discussion Recommended Action: Approve the Preliminary & Final Plat for the Galleria Shopping Center. Info/Back ,ground The applicant is proposing a plat to create separate lots for the Crate & Barrel and Gabbert's stores and their associated parking areas. (See page A6.) There would be no additions to any existing structures to accommodate this request (See the Planning Commission staff report and the proposed lots within the galleria site on pages Al -A6.) . Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission unanimously approved the Galleria Registered Land Survey date stamped September 26, 2008. (See minutes on page A7.) RESOLUTION NO. 2008-115 CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT FOR A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR THE GALLERIA City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the certain plat for the Galleria Shopping Center, platted by Warren Beck, property owner at the regular meeting of the City Council on November 18, 2008, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Passed and adopted by the city council of the city of Edina this 18th day of November, 2008. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 18, 2008 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2008. City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 11�,, oe 0 o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague October 29, 2008 2008- 015.08a Director of Planning Brief Description: Preliminary Plat of the Galleria Site for Gabbert and Beck at 3501 Galleria. (See location on pages Al— A2.) Recommended Action: Recommend that the city council approve the plat. Introduction The applicant is proposing a plat to create separate lots for the Crate & Barrel and Gabbert's stores and their associated parking areas. (See page A6.) There would be no, additions to any existing structures to accommodate this request. (See existing and proposed lots within the galleria site on pages A5 —A6.) Primary Issue • Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for this site? Yes. The applicant is simply creating a separate lot for the Crate & Barrel store to accommodate the recent remodeling /addition to the store and its parking area. The plat also creates a separate lot for the Gabbert's store. (See page A6.) Again, there are no changes proposed to any structures on the site. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the city council give preliminary approval to the Registered Land Survey, date stamped September 26, 2008. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. r . �f ♦ 7lb Fi 1 ,5e^ t • r r -yam. f-4- I , dr .y `tiCa fl rte 'tea P .��ja��.yy.. t ATf �• '. a' 7f' V� f.. All • 111 'v.t• r -s. - �; � :i i - qw, 'Yi, � "ii a .r "114 . 1. 1 t (iJ t0 � 1 � ♦ �tM'N- N'Ii!/rM '�.%' .w •.�.. Ifntli {NMR A1�rr1 H • p 1 '. 1 � t 3 ' Yr%4 zvp f .g +�i! R e �Nirl !f t� RTll1r 1 lwllil4� / I IJ WHEN f'. tr V PFI 1 �_ -�•: ow, 'r t $! t F r a t� +17-ivr Q -t y�T f 1•tR_._ ■1 h rr �/ � s r` t f� � � !R{'Tra' �'Y i 'yt ex•NI{rtpr IrKr' ♦ � WV Poo"! t G F4Mr. Yn< a9ZO t7(� M �_ � - '�K•`** f♦R' v i I.tl e.•hv ••rnhfRr "N! +� MM11�tMr rf( ��.�J 1 ■n d� • e, e�`�'�I � iu�pA Y r m _ . y .... - 70TH ST W E� 1 iY �a A i :4J N7 ♦whM,r ? .. ,.t. .'� � F ,�.' •�'- - C 14.T Ie •.,t r -�.a 'ark rf�!9++« f e [Y 11 1. 1 a amtl ArdVS C�,V JCf LOGt9 COME 2705 Al City of Edina Legend 6600 Highlighted Future 300 cuaraoosna House Number labels steal Name labels Y� 6753 6775 / Clty UM S Creaks Lake Nam.• sns Lakes Parka 2 <� Pared. 21 0303 S< 6 0009 9,'S„p_7y 6025 3500 89TII St w 09TH 57 W 3905 6900 6921 7501 24 )f01 6950 w 7950 T 0973 1< SI 3970 6990 3100 )bF A70TH W -- a � '1001 loss 1000 7001 JSOr J301 N n W 7020 4000 G1a. 7000 < C 7001 N a Pat F > 6001 7101 36M 7110 6000 71C? 3387 HAZB.70N RD T05y 3467 3373 7750 ]f71 21 7151 v.+MWS CmYy41C1lOCi 0. aVS 0 %a?'t •Tj �i U U 0����1 a rl�r Al REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0. _ 1 Nwmy solllr Wal n mvwdmve e1W Its ,-d vl aapl. sae, Y--. slab!- v1 Ipap m wnwdsd. 1 Nan —,d N• lanvaNp d•avbd Ofgoll YWVIW Y pn Cwinl/ al x.ngla and sal• a Yin ®1. a en: M.T C R.,bt— Lwd Survey Nn 16 R and MFCT Y. Ruplaload Lwd Survey Na Ilya. I NoeDy s•r111y Ual Wa R•pbload Lwd Su y b o moost rgr•pwlallm vl Wa —Ay d•yv0•d iq•ae: Wal WN R.WY Lwd Swwy em wq by m• w wdo ml tt-t --- and Wal l s v ., Lk-." l Sump wdw W Ian a W SWW p1 — WN — wr p1 R•RN E YW. Llsws•d Lwd SWp W YYn•gW Lkws• Nn 1B•Ip OTT NF fDO1A YMIESYTF TMs R•yslo•d Lwd Smy em galawd wd amwtW by IN• Oly (.olntll W Ed1Ta —t-W. pl v ,,W. mmWy Nero WI• _dal vl — Yap Ymaper —AM SEJtM= MpMTLRTIT, Nongi. C to Yln•mb •r•vy ur1Vy Wvl — 0•— M m— w P d ) M. a•w mid Iw W IwN d7 m " R•pl•lw•d Lwtl Sa Ovl•d WN _ day of tax it L FlNept xwnga Cmnll wdRw pqul/ Sp1pET dNSR1, xongln fsm1F YYwwla Wgw1 la YYarmla St.— —1. —.SpS (IpppJ, INY R•pM•rN Lwd Swwy Na• Y•q wpgM WI• dal a1 pf1fID. IAbn P. Yrmm, xon•pin fanly Su.gp REOSMM M' NRES. xoN . C M, YYngala I Nobly s•r1Vy Wal Vdd R•pl•lY•d Lwd Sw.•I Na vinv WI• _ dvy a1 YItl�vY N. djlnMx. RgYYw v1 iI1N• eaa Red H WY ippS. vl a'tla4 �Y. 0-1, um SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS DETAIL B T NO SCALE TRACT A i Pit r "Le, TRACT C sag.4227"W Mai i 290.90 599.39'22 "W 6.57--i • "I., 99.0 m00r2l.39"w 569-42'41"W mo(mr3s*w TRACT B -t L tap` -1— .,E BAN-ALA-W — I 100 5 0 1. M SCALE IN rErr PEARPICS ARE BASED ON DE SMM UNE OF R.L.S. HO. IM HAVRO A KA OF S8r49O0r% 0 OU40TES IRON MONUMENT SET AND WARKM MTH UCENSE tM 16410. MLESS OnWRWISE MOIM. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS DETAIL A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. SB9'4W20"W AN JRACT A So a "W TRACT C ""'0" 7 TRACT SOOe11,OJrE 03 R.L.S. 11113. 1641 H.L.S. NO. 629 H.L.S. NO. 1641 L . -'E WEST 69TH STREET - N8.M4!O8"W S-5a R-65.00 -- - -------- 1359.04 N09*48'54"E 80.26 S44 '51'IX*W 159.21 90.89y• 0 89 0-2 14.58 SOO 2 E 14 '57 -�YNWV57"E 9 '7 gi 540741257W TRACT 8 _._N 'T, rTI I C TRACI C!P A MC TRACT A & NO TRACT C TRACT C I 1 w 1110 R.L.S. NO. 1792 0 0 R.L.S. z SEE W. as V2 ST. 06 NO d LU C, 2ao.uo- ' T.L S89,39 �PETAJL El, Su Se 280.86 22"W ...... v 9-49'20"W 'S' Ul 0 ?!I C, > d O""L A I L A I Ul lug TRACT B -------- TR CT 9 R.L.S. LS 140. 1774 R.L.S. NO. 1774 -Z —j27'.*17—: R-25.001.. A-63*391 1459.74 589'4?�_ ..-' •STREET 8 WEST 7 — — — --- — — — — — - r-Brg.-S31'49'05"E — — — — — — — — — — — — — — YORKTOWN DETAIL B T NO SCALE TRACT A i Pit r "Le, TRACT C sag.4227"W Mai i 290.90 599.39'22 "W 6.57--i • "I., 99.0 m00r2l.39"w 569-42'41"W mo(mr3s*w TRACT B -t L tap` -1— .,E BAN-ALA-W — I 100 5 0 1. M SCALE IN rErr PEARPICS ARE BASED ON DE SMM UNE OF R.L.S. HO. IM HAVRO A KA OF S8r49O0r% 0 OU40TES IRON MONUMENT SET AND WARKM MTH UCENSE tM 16410. MLESS OnWRWISE MOIM. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS DETAIL A o NO SCALE SB9'4W20"W AN JRACT A So a "W TRACT C ""'0" 7 TRACT SOOe11,OJrE 03 S09-44!05r*W M -24.00 L . -'E -1 l'OS'E 569'44'09 °W OOq, 0' - N8.M4!O8"W S-5a ,103 2Z12 SOO-11*OY*E ! 80.26 S44 '51'IX*W Sao W -.Wz(r 9.10 540741257W TRACT 8 NO DETAIL B T NO SCALE TRACT A i Pit r "Le, TRACT C sag.4227"W Mai i 290.90 599.39'22 "W 6.57--i • "I., 99.0 m00r2l.39"w 569-42'41"W mo(mr3s*w TRACT B -t L tap` -1— .,E BAN-ALA-W — I 100 5 0 1. M SCALE IN rErr PEARPICS ARE BASED ON DE SMM UNE OF R.L.S. HO. IM HAVRO A KA OF S8r49O0r% 0 OU40TES IRON MONUMENT SET AND WARKM MTH UCENSE tM 16410. MLESS OnWRWISE MOIM. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS cm r SAIYDEU A VE O a V IV V F, o O � tiOo ai a S 3AY MNYNj n e FAANCEAVE 5 �n 0 Q N c r, C io YCRKAVE 5 V O y� 0 A N O 6 a v w Of N V N V WORKING DRAWING 0- o- 0 wz Z LyZ o o Q rc w� U z Z Q u � v (proposed) REGISTERED LAND SURVEY RESUBDIVISION OF TRACT C, R.L.S. RESUBDIVISION OF TRACT B, R.L.S. WEST 69th STREET WEST 70th STREET 1648 & 1774 WESTIN GALLERIA WESTIN GALLERIA PARKING RAMP E NOT TO SCALE F- D 0 w d � z Z > g Q rc Y °u O .. Y REVISED 03 -28 -08 PC Meeting October 29, 2008 2008.15 Preliminary Plat ;�� Galleria Shopping Center 3510 70t" Street West Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant is proposing a plat to create separate lots for the Crate & Barrel and- Gabbert's'stores and their associated parking areas. There would be no additions to any-existing structures to accommodate this request. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends/that'the city council give preliminary approval to the Registered Land Survey, date stamped September 26, 2008. Approval is subject to the following conditions: j 1. The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive -a- written application'for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. A� Aaae'arin4,for Applicant �. Keith Dahl, URS Public Comments i There wete.no public comments. Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded'the:motion. All voted aye; motion carried. . Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 47 To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: New Liquor Licenses — Romano's Macaroni Grill REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item II.C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Motion approving New On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Sunday On -Sale Liquor License to Mac Acquisition LLC dba Romano's Macaroni Grill, 7651 France Avenue South, for the period beginning November 20, 2008 and ending March 31, 2009. Info /Background: Romano's Macaroni Grill, has been operating on France Avenue since 1998. They informed us that they will be changing ownership the end of November. Edina's code requires that the new owners go through the licensing process. Mac Acquisition LLC dba Romano's Macaroni Grill has applied for new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the licenses. Edina Code requires a public hearing before the issuance of a new liquor license. The proper notification has been published in the Edina Sun Current. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation.. Attached is Sgt. Kuyper's memo stating the findings of the Police Department's background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY 9i ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE Establishment: Romano's Macaroni Grill License: On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" On September 30, 2008, Mac Acquisition .LLC made application to the City of Edina for an On- Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" license. The required alcohol awareness training has been scheduled for November 08, 2008 for employees. The three restaurant managers have completed their alcohol awareness training. Mac Acquisition .LLC is .incorporated in the State of Minnesota and the State of Delaware. The Minnesota Secretary of State and the Delaware Secretary of State report they are in good standing. O ,Aziers /Partners /Managin Members /Corporate Officers of Mac Acquisition LLC are: Joshua Olshansky San Francisco, CA (President, CEO, VP, Secretary) The owners /managers /members have been. investigated and were found to have no criminal records. Checks were made with the following agencies. NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Delaware Secretary of State Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Liquor Control Board Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent Mac Acquisition LLC from obtaining an On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" license. 1, would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Sgt. Scott Kuyper 4123 Ik iu7 I REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item W.A. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only ❑ Dater November 18, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Action ® Motion Donations ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2008-117 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed,donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to Edina Park Department: $51.00 Tree For Grandview Square Park 9 P Block Subdivision Edina Senior Citizens Owner Donation to Edina Police Department: $2,500.00 Rescue Phone For Emergency Communications CenterPointe Energy 3011721310056 Company Edina Community Foundation $5,000.00 Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction 13 Donations to Braemar Golf Course: $145.00 Daniel Peterson $50.00 Braemar Men's Club R. J. Barrett, Jr. $10.00 - Dr. Franklin Stickel $50.00 Gary Braun $25.00 Vay Stonebraker $30.00 $1 Britton Goetze, Jr. $10.00 Robert Teese $ 25.00 J. E. Hughes $100.00 Peter Warner Raymond O'Connell $200.00 Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction Out Lot 1 Donation to the City of Edina of various parcels in Parkwood Knolls from Parkwood Knolls Construction Company for use as storm water ponds: Le al Descri tion Dated: November 18, 2008 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Lot 9 P Block Subdivision PID Owner Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction Out Lot B Parkwood Knolls 24th Addition 3011721310056 Company Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction 13 5 Parkwood Knolls 3111721120031 Company Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction Out Lot 1 Parkwood Knolls 12th Addition 3111721130008 Company Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction 14 1 Parkwood Knolls 5th Addition 3111721140007 Company Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction Out Lot 1 Parkwood Knolls 8th Addition 3111721140033 Company Carl M Hansen Parkwood Construction Reserve Lot A Parkwood Knolls 4th Addition 3111721210032 Company Dated: November 18, 2008 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Ow e U) 0 To: Mayor & City Council From: Bob Wilson City Assessor Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: Resolution No. 2008 -118 Authorizing Special Assessment Deferrals Recommendation: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item IV.B Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion 11 Adopt Resolution 2008 -118 authorizing deferrals of special assessments. Information /Background: Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. Applicants listed in the attached resolution have met all requirements for special assessment deferment. i RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -118 APPROVING DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, certain applications and authorization for deferral of special assessments have been received by the City of Edina from citizens seeking to have the special assessments for their properties deferred as allowed by provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following applications are hereby granted the requested deferral of special assessments: PID 30- 028 -24 -33 -0065 30- 028 -24-41 -0022 30- 028 -24-43 -0004 30- 028 -24-43 -0042 30- 028 -24 -44 -0017 30- 028 -24-44 -0019 PROPERTY OWNER Grace Wu Marjorie Rlshavy Edith B. Cole Milton Farnham William Holm Marlys Schlachter Chase ADDRESS LEVY NO. 4808 Dunberry Ln 17204 6705 Cornelia Dr 17205 6900 Cornelia Dr 17205 6945 Cornelia Dr 17205 6925 Southdale Rd 17205 6933 Southdale Rd 17205 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2008 ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 18, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2 ,20— Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk REPORPRECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for November 5, 2008 Recommendation: Agenda Item IV.0 Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, November 5, 2008. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min \09- 03- 08.doc TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, November 5, 2008 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on November 5, 2008. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Deputy Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the November 18, 2008, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: 1. Request for multiple traffic control signs in the new Parkwood Knolls 27th Addition. This request comes from the Edina Engineering Department and is needed to effectively designate right -of -way and ensure safe and effective traffic flow for both the new and existing ,roadways within the Parkwood Knolls 27th Addition. Staff does not have current traffic data for these streets. Staff is recommending the following: a) New stop sign for east bound Kelsey Court at Kelsey Terrace. b) New stop sign at west bound Bluff Circle at Kelsey Terrace. New street sign at same location. C) New all -way stop signs for Kelsey Terrace, intersecting with Kelsey Circle and Ridge Trail. d) New stop sign at north bound Ridge Circle at Kelsey Terrace. e) New stop sign at west bound Willow Wood Road at Kelsey Terrace. traffic flow. Traffic Safety Staff Review November 5, 2008 control siLyns in Page 1 of 6 G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 11 -05 -08.doc 2. Request to remove the "No Parking Anytime" signs on the west side of Xerxes Avenue south of 691h Street. This request comes from a resident who lives on the Richfield side of Xerxes Avenue in the 6900 block. The current "No Parking Anytime" signs are located on the west side of Xerxes Ave and run approximately %z -block south of 69th Street. These parking restrictions were put in place in September of 1989 at the request of a business at that location. That business has since moved and the area is now a major construction project that will house both residential apartments and retail businesses. The requestor is concerned that if the existing no. parking signs remain, customers and visitors to this new complex will be forced to park on her side of the street making street parking more difficult for her and her neighbors. The east side of Xerxes Ave consists entirely of single family homes. The 6900 block of Xerxes Avenue is a 33 -foot, wide street that is shared with Richfield and has curb, gutter, and a sidewalk on the east side. Xerxes Avenue is wide enough to safely accommodate parking on both sides of the street. Staff feels this is a valid request. Staff recommends the removal of the "No P SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request. 1. Request for an All -Way stop at the intersection of Valley View road and Tingdale Avenue. This request comes from two residents who are concerned with the speed and volume of traffic on Valley View Road in the area of Tingdale Avenue. Valley View Road, at Tingdale Avenue, is a 30 -foot wide residential street with curb, gutter, and a posted 30 MPH speed limit. There are no sidewalks on Valley View Road. A stop sign currently exists for south bound Tingdale Avenue traffic at Valley View Road. Traffic Safety Staff Review November 5, 2008 Page 2 of 6 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 11- 05 -08.doc As a result of this request, a traffic study was conducted from October 9- 17, 2008, on Valley View Road, %Z -block west of Tingdale Avenue. This study counted a total of 10,273 vehicles over a ten day period. The Monday through Friday average daily traffic count was 1,430 with an 85d,- percentile speed of 35.9 MPH. No traffic accidents have been reported in this area in the past five years. The data that was collected from this study shows that traffic volume and speed do not meet warrants for the City's multiway stop sign policy. The purpose of the multiway stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all requests for multiway, all way, and 4 -way stop signs. Multiway stop signs can be an effective safety measure if properly warranted. However, they should not be installed inappropriately where they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless noise. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. Staff recommends the denial of the request for an All -Way stop at the intersection of Valley View Road and Tingdale Avenue for lack of warrants. 2. A request to replace the existing "Resident Parking Only" signs located at 5844 Brookview Avenue, which are old and faded, with new signs. Requestors home is located on the north west corner of W. 59th Street and Brookview Avenue. There are two signs that say "Resident Parking Only" located at this property. One sign is directly in front of the home on Brookview Avenue and another is located on the W. 59th Street side of the home. W. 59`h Street dead ends to the west at Pamela Park. The City of Edina has no policy for "Resident Only Parking" signs. Staff, after a thorough search of records, can not find any City Council authorization for these signs. It is not known how long these signs have been in place or who, if anyone, gave authorization for their installation. Requests for similar signs (around churches and schools, etc.) have always been denied. Restricting parking on a City street directed at or limited to any part of the public would be discriminatory in nature as well as unenforceable. Any regulatory traffic sign placed on a City street must have the approval of the City Council. Traffic Safety Staff Review November 5, 2008 Page 3 of 6 G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min\Traffic Safety Review 11- 05 -08.doc Section 1 -A.8 of the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices states, "Traffic control devices and other signs within the right -of- way shall be placed only as authorized by a public authority or the official having jurisdiction, for the purpose of regulating, warning, or guiding traffic. All regulatory traffic control devices shall be supported by laws, ordinances, or regulations. Any unauthorized traffic control device or other sign or message placed on the right -of -way by a private organization or individual constitutes a public nuisance and should be removed Staff has been informed that the resident making this request is now out of the state for the remaining winter months. Staff has made several phone calls and left voice mail messages with the requestor -but has not heard back from him. Staff is recommending, for the above stated reasons, that these two signs be removed. Staff will continue to try to contact requestor and give him the option of requesting other parking restrictions through the proper channels. Staff recommends denial of the request to replace the current "Resident Only Parking" signs with new ones 'and further recommends the removal of the two existing signs for lack of proper authorization. 3'. Request for advanced warning signs that state "Stop Ahead ", on Benton Avenue in both directions, to warn motorists of the all -way stop at the intersection of Tingdale Avenue. This request comes from a resident on the 5800 block of Tingdale Avenue who states that he constantly sees cars failing to stop for the stop signs controlling Benton Avenue. Benton Avenue is a collector street with a Monday through Friday average daily traffic count of 3,541 vehicles and an 85th- percentile speed of 35.4 MPH. There have been no reported accidents in the past five years. City policy states that warning signs should only be used when it is deemed necessary to warn traffic of existing or potentially hazardous conditions on or adjacent to a street. Warning signs require caution on the part of the vehicle operator and may call for a reduction in speed or a maneuver in the interest of safety for the motorist or pedestrian. Policy states that the use of warning signs should be kept to a minimum. Traffic Safety Staff Review November 5, 2008 Page 4 of 6 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review I I- 05- 08.doe The overuse of warning signs, especially for conditions which are apparent, tends to breed disrespect for signs in general, causing a loss of effectiveness. Warning signs may initially have a positive effect but soon lose the attention of regular passers -by. Also, advanced warning signs have to be installed in someone's yard. Stop ahead warning signs are used when new stop signs are installed and on approaches where a stop sign is not continuously visible to the driver. As previously stated, this intersection is currently an all -way (4 -way) stop with no clear view issues on approaches from either direction. Staff recommends denial of this request for lack of warrants. Staff recommends denial of the request for advanced stop ahead warning signs, in both directions, for Benton Avenue approaching Tin dale Avenue for lack of warrants. 4. Request for a pedestrian crosswalk, crossing Valley View Road, at the intersection of Creek Valley Road. This request comes from a resident on Creek Valley Road who is concerned with the safety of pedestrians crossing Valley View Road. Valley View road is a 44 -foot wide B -Minor Arterial street with curb, gutter, and a sidewalk on the east side. The average Monday through ;Friday daily traffic count is 6,653 vehicles and an 85th- percentile speed of 39.3 MPH. There has been one reported property damage vehicle accident at this intersection in the past five years. As a result of this request, staff conducted pedestrian counts in this area during the morning school hours. Staff observed very few pedestrians in this area with only one pedestrian crossing Valley View Road. City policy on crosswalks state that they shall only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight -hour period. Excessive use of pedestrian signs and pavement marking can substantially reduce the effectiveness of such devices. A consistent application of this policy will serve both the motorist and pedestrian within the City. There are several pedestrian crosswalks currently in place adjacent to the schools on Valley View Road. Traffic Safety Staff Review November 5, 2008 Page 5 of 6 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 11- 05 -08.doc Staff recommends the denial of the request for a pedestrian crosswalk, crossing Valley View Road at Creek Valley Road, for lack of warrants. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request for "No Parking Anytime" signs for the north side of Ayrshire Boulevard between Lochley Drive and Doncaster Way. Staff will be sending out a survey to all residents who will be affected by this request. Traffic Safety Staff Review November 5, 2008 Page 6 of 6 G:\ Engineering \infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 11- 05 -08.doc REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE a44— City Engineer Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: Resolution for Agency Agreement Between Department of Transportation and City of Edina for Participation in Preliminary Engineering of Safe Routes to School Recommendation: Agenda Item # Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action IV. D. ❑ To HRA ® To Council ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion If the Council determines the agreement appropriate, Council shall adopt resolution 2008 -119 accepting the MnDOT grant agreement 93737. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation has awarded the City of Edina a grant of $24,640 to retain a consultant for the development of safe routes to schools within the City of Edina. The study will provide the necessary engineering analysis to reduce the speed limits adjacent to all schools within Edina. The study will also include an educational component of both students and the general public of Edina. This agreement was originally presented to Council on August 19, 2008. Since that date MnDOT has modified the agreement language thus requiring action by City Council. G:\ Engineering\ lnfrastructure\StreetskSidewalks n Bikeways \Safe Route to School\2007 Successful Application \20081118_RR_2008- 119.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2008-119 STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CITY OF EDINA A RESOLUTION FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR S.P. 120 - 591 -01; M.P. SRTS 2708(070) BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Stat. Sec. 161.36, the Commissioner of Transportation be appointed as Agent of the City of Edina to accept as its agent, federal aid funds which may be made available for eligible transportation related projects. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Mayor and City Engineer are hereby authorized and directed for and behalf of the City to execute and enter into an agreement with the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and conditions of said federal aid participation as set forth and contained in "Minnesota Department of Transportation Agency Agreement No. 93737," a * copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. Passed and adopted this 18th day of November, 2008. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 18, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk Mn/DOT Agreement No. 93737 STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CITY OF EDINA FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN FORCE ACCOUNT FOR S.P. 120 - 591 -01; M.P. SRTS 2708(070) This agreement is entered into by and between CITY OF EDINA ( "City") and the State of Minnesota acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ( "Mn/DOT "), Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.36, the City desires Mn/DOT to act as the City's agent to accept and disburse federal funds for the construction, improvement, or enhancement of transportation financed in whole or in part by federal funds, hereinafter referred to as the "Project "; and The City is proposing a federal aid project to conduct a traffic study that will provide the necessary engineering analysis to reduce speed limits adjacent to all thirteen schools within Edina and develop a safety education program for all public and private schools within Edina. A public interest finding has determined that SPECIFIC PORTION of the project can be completed more economically, as a Force Account hereinafter referred to as the "FORCE ACCOUNT "; and The FORCE. ACCOUNT is eligible for the expenditure of federal aid funds, and is identified in - Mn/DOT records as State Project 120 - 591 -01, and in .Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA ") records as Minnesota Project SRTS 2708(070); and Mn/DOT requires that the terms and conditions of this agency be set forth in an agreement. THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. DUTIES OF THE CITY. A. DESIGNATION. The City designates Mn/DOT to act as its agent to accept and disburse federal funds made available for the Project. B. ELIGIBILITY / COSTS. The estimated cost of the FORCE ACCOUNT is $24,640.00 1. It is anticipated that 100% (up to $24,640.00) of the cost of the FORCE ACCOUNT is to be paid from federal funds made available by the FHWA, and Agreement no. 93737 -1- that the. The City will pay any part of the cost or expense of the work that the FHWA does not pay. 2. Any costs incurred by the City prior to authorization, will not be eligible for federal participation. 3. Eligible cost and expense, if approved, may consist of the following: a) The cost of hiring a consultant to conduct a speed zone study on all roadways adjacent to Edina's schools. The study will provide the necessary engineering analysis to reduce speed limits adjacent to all thirteen schools within Edina and develop a safety education program for all public and private schools within Edina. b) Develop and deploy safety education materials. c) Gather baseline date about the current numbers of bikers and walkers at each school. d) The direct labor charges for City employees for the time that said employees are engaged in the work to be performed by the City pursuant to this agreement. Said labor charges may include the prorata share of "labor additives" applicable to said labor charges. Costs to the City of "labor additives" consisting of holiday pay, vacation, sick leave, retirement, pension, unemployment taxes, compensation and liability insurance, lost time charges and similar costs incidental to labor employment will be reimbursed only when supported by adequate records. e) The applicable equipment rental charges for City owned equipment used by the City and mileage charges for employee owned vehicles used by the City on the work to be performed pursuant to this agreement, at rates reflective of the City actual cost. f) Expenditures for materials, supplies, mechanical data processing and equipment rental, limited to the actual expenditures for the purposes of this agreement. 4. Expenditures for general administration, supervision, maintenance and other overhead or incidental expenses of the City are not eligible for federal participation. 5. Acceptability of costs under this agreement will be determined in accordance with the cost principles and procedures set forth in the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulations, Contract Cost Principals and Procedures, 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 31 which is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement. 6. For costs expected to exceed $24,640.00, the City must request the preparation Agreement no. 93737 -2- and execution of a supplement to this agreement, prior to incurring such costs. C. STAFFING. 1. The City will designate a publicly employed registered engineer, ( "Project Engineer "), to be in responsible charge of the Project and to supervise and direct the work to be performed under any construction contract let for the Project. If City elects to use a private consultant for engineering services, the City will provide a qualified, full -time public employee of the City, to be in responsible charge of the Project. The services of the City to be performed pursuant to this agreement may not be assigned, sublet, or transferred unless the City is notified in writing by Mn/DOT that such action is permitted under 23 CFR 1.33 and 23 CFR 635.105 and state law. This written consent will in no way relieve the City from its primary responsibility for performance of the work. 2. During the progress of the work on the Project, the City authorizes its Project Engineer to request in writing specific engineering and/or technical services from Mn/DOT, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.39. Such services may be covered by other technical service agreements. If Mn/DOT furnishes the services requested, and if Mn/DOT requests reimbursement, then the City will promptly pay Mn/DOT to reimburse the state trunk highway fund for the full cost and expense of furnishing such services. The costs and expenses will include the current Mn/DOT labor additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based on actual direct .costs that have been verified by audit. Provision of such services will not be deemed to make Mn/DOT a principal or co- principal with respect to the Project. 3. The City will furnish the personnel, services, supplies, and equipment necessary to properly supervise, inspect, and document the work for the Project. D. CONTRACT - ADMINISTRATION. 1. The City will request approval from Mn/DOT for all costs in excess of the amount of federal funds previously approved for the Project prior to incurring such costs. Failure. to obtain such approval may result in such costs being disallowed for reimbursement. 2. The City will prepare reports, keep records, and perform work so as to enable Mn/DOT to collect the federal aid sought by the City. The City will retain all records and reports in accordance with Mn/DOT's record retention schedule for federal aid projects. 3. Upon completion of the Project, the Project Engineer will determine whether the work will be accepted. Agreement no. 93737 -3- E. PAYMENTS. 1. The entire cost of the Project is to be paid from federal funds made available by the FHWA and by other funds provided by the City. The City will pay any part of the cost or expense of the Project that is not paid by federal funds. 2. The City may request partial payments not more than once each thirty (30) days. The Project Engineer will certify each partial estimate. 3. The invoice and supplements thereto, will contain all details that may be necessary for a proper audit. Such details will consist of at least the following: (a) A breakdown of labor by individual, classification, dates and hours worked times the applicable rate to arrive at a total dollar amount for each individual. (b) The labor additive may be applied to total labor dollars, not including overtime labor dollars. (c) The equipment charges must be broken down by type of equipment times the applicable rate and dates used to arrive at total equipment charges. (d) A detailed breakdown of outside services used and supporting invoices. Documentation that costs of outside services have been paid. (e) Detail for materials, supplies, and other items with the description, units, and unit prices included in the invoice. If materials or supplies are purchased from an outside source, a copy of that invoice must be included. (f) The invoices will include 100% of eligible charges applicable to the Preliminary Engineering (OR) Construction Engineering (OR) Right -of -way Acquisition so that the prorata share of federal and City participation can be applied to the total costs. 4. Following certification, by the Project Engineer, of the final estimate, the City may request reimbursement for costs eligible for federal funds. The City's request will be made to Mn/DOT and will include a copy of the certified final estimate along with the required records. 5. Reimbursement of costs under this agreement will be based on actual costs, but limited to eligible items. Agreement no. 93737 -4- F. LIMITATIONS. The City will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations. 2. Nondiscrimination. It is the policy of the Federal Highway Administration and the State of Minnesota that no person in the United States will, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance (42 U.S.C. 2000d). Through expansion of the mandate for nondiscrimination in Title VI and through parallel legislation, the prescribed bases of discrimination include race, color, sex, national origin, age, and disability. In addition, the Title VI program has been extended to cover all programs, activities and services of an entity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether such programs and activities are Federally assisted or not. Even in the absence of prior discriminatory practice or usage, a recipient in administering a program or activity to which this part applies, is expected to take affirmative action to assure that no person is excluded from participation in, or is denied the benefits of, the program or activity on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. It is the responsibility of the City to carry out the above requirements. 3. Workers' Compensation. Any and all employees of the City or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required or permitted by the City under this agreement will not be considered employees of Mn/DOT, and any and all claims that may arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of Minnesota on behalf of said employees, or other persons while so engaged, will in no way be the obligation or responsibility of Mn/DOT. The City will require proof of Workers' Compensation Insurance from any contractor and sub - contractor. G. AUDIT. The City will comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circular A -133 including amendments and successors thereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 2. As provided under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, all books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City are subject to examination by the United States Government, Mn/DOT, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate, for a minimum of six years. The City will be responsible for any costs associated with the performance of the audit. H. MAINTENANCE. The City assumes full responsibility for the operation and maintenance of any facility constructed or improved under this Agreement. I. CLAIMS. The City will pay any and all lawful claims arising out of or incidental to the performance of the Project work. The City acknowledges that Mn/DOT is Agreement no. 93737 -5- acting only as the City's agent for receipt and disbursement of federal funds, and not as a principal or co- principal with respect to the Project. In all events, the City will indemnify Mn/DOT and hold Mn/DOT harmless from any claims arising out of the Project. II. DUTIES OF Mn/DOT. A. ACCEPTANCE. Mn/DOT accepts designation as Agent of the City for the receipt and disbursement of federal funds and will act in accordance herewith. B. PROJECT ACTIVITIES. Mn/DOT will make the necessary requests to the FHWA for authorization to use federal funds for the Project, and for reimbursement of eligible costs pursuant to the terms of this agreement. C. PAYMENTS. 1. Mn/DOT will receive the federal funds to be paid by the FHWA for the Project, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 161.36, Subdivision 2. 2. Mn/DOT will review and certify each partial pay request. Following certification of the partial estimate, Mn/DOT will reimburse the City, from said federal funds made available to the Project, for each partial payment request, subject to the availability and limits of those funds. 3. Upon completion of the Project, the City will prepare a final payment request in accordance with the terms of this agreement. Mn/DOT will review and certify the final payment request with a final audit. 4. No more than 90% of the reimbursement due under this agreement will be paid until completion of the final audit and approval by Mn/DOT's authorized representative. 5. In the event Mn/DOT does not obtain funding from the FHWA or other funding source, or funding cannot be continued at a sufficient level to allow for the processing of the federal aid reimbursement requests, the City may continue the work with local funds only, until such time as Mn/DOT is able to process the federal aid reimbursement requests. D. AUTHORITY. Mn/DOT may withhold federal funds, where Mn/DOT or the FHWA determines that the Project was not completed in compliance with federal requirements. E. INSPECTION. Mn/DOT, the FHWA, or duly authorized representatives of the state and federal government will have the right to audit, evaluate and monitor the work performed under this agreement. The City will make available all books, records, and documents pertaining to the work hereunder, for a minimum of seven ,years following the closing of the construction contract. Agreement no. 93737 -6- III AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. Each authorized representative will have responsibility to administer this agreement and to ensure that all payments due to the other party are paid pursuant to the terms of this agreement. A. The City authorized representative is Wayne Houle, City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50`h Street, Edina, MN, 55424 -1394, phone 952- 826 -0443, or his successor. B. Mn/DOT's authorized representative is Kristie M. Billiar, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of State Aid, Mail Stop 500, St Paul, MN 55155, phone 651.366.3833, or her successor. IV. TORT LIABILITY. Each party is responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of any others and the results thereof. The Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736, governs Mn/DOT liability. V. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party will assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this agreement without prior written approval of the other party. VI. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments /supplements to this Agreement must be in writing and be executed by the same parties who executed the original agreement, or their successors in office. VII. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This agreement is be effective upon execution by the City and by appropriate State officials, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, and will remain in effect for five (5) years from the effective date or until all obligations set forth in this agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. VIII. TERMINATION. This agreement may be terminated by the City or Mn/DOT at any time, with or without cause, upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. Such termination will not remove any unfulfilled financial obligations of the City as set forth in this Agreement. In the event of such a termination the City will be entitled to reimbursement for Mn/DOT- approved federally eligible expenses incurred for work satisfactorily performed on the Project to the date of termination subject to the terms of this agreement. Remainder of this page left intentionally blank Agreement no. 93737 -7- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intend to be bound thereby. CITY City certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the contract on its behalf as required by applicable resolutions, ordinances, or charter provisions M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: Title: Director State Aid for Local Transportation Date: Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION By: Date: Title: -8- By: Date: Agreement no. 93737 (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93737) C: \Documents and Settings \jsullivan \Desktop \120 -591 -001 FA SRTS AGREEMENT ev.doc 2/5/00 Page 9 CITY iNA 1 810:36:13 R55CKRE(; .G20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315682 1116/2008 123553 411BUSINESSDIRECT.COM 449.95 ON LINE PHONE LISTING 198389 BD56208 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 449.95 315683 11/6/2008 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 11.19 SOD 00001417 198589 31307 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 11.19 315684 11/612008 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 30.56 198284 0311354 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 65.60 198285 0311358 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 53.60 198286 0311276 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 32.08 198287 0721509 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 181.84 315685 1116/2008 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 331.03 MAIL PROCESSING 198211 211571 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 331.03 315686 11/612008 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 95.74 PEST CONTROL 00006130 198212 473103 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 95.74 315687 11/6/2008 105571 ADVANTAGE PAPER 178.92 FOAM CUPS 198508 433901 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 178.92 315688 11/6/2008 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 398.62 EVENT CALENDAR 198509 73790 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 398.62 315689 11/6/2008 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 372.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198327 102408 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 372.50 315690 11/612008 123555 ANDERSON, SANDRA 65.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198377 102708 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 315691 111612008 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 257.89 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198213 102808 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 257.89 R55CKREG LOG20000 198288 46659200 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,647.08 198289 4677300 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 288.98 198290 5748200 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315692 1116/2008 81459500 102172 APPERT S FOODSERVICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 81.22 198293 81484500 490.81 FOOD 198214 1045512 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 81459400 5842.5515 490.81 YORK SELLING 149.10 198404 46677100 315693 1116/2008 VERNON SELLING 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 198473 81484600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 86.91 COFFEE 198215 410500 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 315696 11/6/2008 165.97 COFFEE 198388 410564 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 252.88 102708 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 135.20 315694 1116/2008 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 315697 11/612008 123557 BERG, SCOTT 297.14 GOAL FRAME PADS 00008044 198216 00070948 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103008 5900.2015 297.14 UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 116.12 315695 11/612008 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 2 Business Unit GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA ICE MAINT 140.55 198288 46659200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,647.08 198289 4677300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 288.98 198290 5748200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 443.53 198291 5744800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 56.06 198292 81459500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 81.22 198293 81484500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 188.14 198294 81459400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 149.10 198404 46677100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 155.04 198473 81484600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,149.70 315696 11/6/2008 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 135.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198378 102708 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 135.20 315697 11/612008 123557 BERG, SCOTT 116.12 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 198452 103008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 116.12 315698 1116/2008 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 91.57 COPIER PAPER 00008047 198217 OE- 174771 -1 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 85.90 SELF STICK WALL PADS 198328 WO- 531436 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 77.16 STEP STOOL 198329 WO- 531388 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.82 CD/DVD SLEEVES 198390 WO- 523566 -1 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 4.22 GRAPHIC CHART TAPE 198391 WO- 523544 -1 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 33.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 198392 OE- 175543 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 340.20 CITY INA 1 810:36:13 R55CKREG _)G20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315699 11/612008 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 198322 110608 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 315700 11/6/2008 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 487.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003737 198510 87023798 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 429.32 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003737 198511 87023101 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 916.32 315701 1116/2008 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 215.00 198405 93679 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 215.00 315702 111612008 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 149.32 VALVE 00005899 198218 242307 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 149.32 315703 11/6/2008 113580 BRONZE MEMORIAL CO. 229.44 PLAQUE 00007063 198219 522392 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 229.44 315704 11/612008 122195 BRUNSWICK ZONE -EDEN PRAIRIE 37.81 BOWLING FEES 198220 6 -1- 304 -21 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 37.81 315705 11/612008 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 686.01 NOV NEWSLETTER 00008219 198512 15858 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 686.01 315706 11/6/2008 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 11/13/08 198507 103108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 315707 1116/2008 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 198321 110608 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 315708 1116/2008 105315 CALTON, BOB 55.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198379 102708 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 315709 111/6/2008 315710 11/612008 315711 1116/2008 315712 11/6/2008 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/6/2008 -11/6/2008 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 37.05 198295 13158 5842.5515 4,199.35 198296 13160 5842.5514 366.00 198297 13157 5822.5514 4,602.40 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 178.00 610.00 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10.13 5590919 -6 10.13 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 1,666.78 00104391 - 0200650018 296.00 00103426- 0203502012 1,751.24 00103426- 0203502003 938.09 00102561 -0203163012 1,756.09 00101025 - 0203610011 275.27 00101025 - 0203600013 92.79 00082198- 0200815001 465.32 00082050- 0200650009 358.90 00077443 - 0203163003 733.23 00077443 - 0203158108 71.27 00077443- 0200862003 410.37 00077442 - 0203158000 62.80 00077442 -0200650027 8,878.15 198406 80028 5862.5513 198407 80074 5842.5513 198393 OCT2008 7413.6582 198513 0200650018 -10/0 1551.6189 8 198514 0203502012 -10/0 1552.6189 8 198515 0203502003 -10/0 1552.6189 8 198516 0203163012 -10/0 5861.6189 8 198517 0203610011 -10/0 1628.6189 8 198518 0203600013 -10/0 1628.6189 8 198519 0200815001 -10/0 1375.6189 8 198520 020065009 -10/08 1551.6189 198521 0203163003 -10/0 5861.6189 8 198522 0203158108 -1010 1552.6189 8 198523 0200862003 -10/0 5821.6189 8 198524 0203158000 -10/0 1552.6189 8 198525 0200650027 -10/0 1646.6189 8 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE FUEL OIL SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER 11/4/2008 1 0:36:13 Page - 4 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PSTF FIRE TOWER CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP CITY HALL GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY NA 1 810:36:13 R55CKREG ,G20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 11/6/2008 - -11/6 /2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315713 11/612008 102008 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 585.00 MUNICIPALS FALL MTG BANQUET 15 198526 103108 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 585.00 315714 111612008 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 1,091.39 FACEPIECES 00003755 198527 121260 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,091.39 315715 1116/2008 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 585.00 198298 0108419907 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 585.00 315716 11/6/2008 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 198330 102308 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 198453 102408 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 61.93 8772 10 614 0177449 198454 102508 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 61.93 8772 10 614 0164959 198590 OCT2508 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 257.81 315717 1116/2008 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 131.74 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00005876 198331 03355305 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 131.74 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00005876 198331 03355305 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 131.74 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00005876 198331 03355305 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 395.22 315718 11/612008 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 117.15 CONCRETE BRICK 00005864 198332 0023673 -IN 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 117.15 315719 11/6/2008 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 226.59 BELTS 00008045 198221 65715 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 226.59 315720 11/6/2008 102596 CROWN TROPHY 10.64 PLAQUE REPAIR 00006133 198455 17071 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10.64 315721 11/6/2008 104020 DALCO 102.67 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008034 198222 2032855 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 108.63 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008046 198223 2032916 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 211.30 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Council Check Register Page - 6 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315722 111612008 285890 102285 DAVANNIS BAKERY 198456 286285 107.62 199.86 MEALS FOR TRAINING 198528 103108 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102808 133.85 199.86 198592 OCT2808 649.30 198592 OCT2808 315723 1116/2008 198592 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3.660.15 198592 OCT2808 2,109.00 198299 479400 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22.40 198300 479401 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 75.80 198577 479398 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 822.00 198578 479397 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,029.20 315724 11/6/2008 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 4.79 609425 WATER 198224 6600256 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 4.79 102659 DPD 321.53 REGISTRATION FORMS 315725 11/6/2008 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 315728 11/612008 102454 DRISTE, BRIAN 64.45 BAKERY 198225 285890 43.17 BAKERY 198456 286285 107.62 315726 11/6/2008 102831 DEX EAST 353.00 198591 102808 133.85 198592 OCT2808 649.30 198592 OCT2808 984.30 198592 OCT2808 3.660.15 198592 OCT2808 315727 11/6/2008 102659 DPD 321.53 REGISTRATION FORMS 321.53 ADVERTISING OTHER 315728 11/612008 102454 DRISTE, BRIAN 251.93 UNIFORM PURCHASE 251.93 ADVERTISING OTHER 315729 11/6/2008 100739 EAGLE WINE 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 00008049 198457 E27109011 5510.6575 198333 102408 1646.6201 PRINTING LAUNDRY GRILL GRILL ED ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF DOME PROGRAM CLUB HOUSE ARENA ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE 159.49 198301 134435 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,547.09 198408 134430 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 39.04- 198409 762814 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 328.75 198474 134439 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY ` AA 1'. J 10:36:13 R55CKREG G20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 11/6/2008 -- 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 41.05 198475 134440 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,037.34 315730 1116/2008 116186 ECHO PROJECT 1,248.00 ECHO PROJECT 198243 2009 -4 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 1,248.00 315731 11/612008 101656 EDINA CHORALE 116.66 PROGRAM ADS 198226 101708 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 116.66 PROGRAM ADS 198226 101708 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 116.68 PROGRAM ADS 198226 101708 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 350.00 315732 111612008 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 15,111.71 GASOLINE 00005413 198529 153593 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15,111.71 315733 11/6/2008 122951 ETICA FAIR TRADE WINE 352.50 198410 1257 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 649.86 198411 1241 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,002.36 315734 11/612008 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 52.05 DELIVERY OF MATERIALS 198593 2- 962 -48101 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 52.05 315735 11/6/2008 105420 FIKES SERVICES 39.41 AIR DEODORIZERS 198334 44468 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 39.41 315736 11/612008 104474 FILTERFRESH 253.38 COFFEE 00005957 198530 79471355 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 253.38 315737 1116/2008 117674 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 141.01 CITATIONS 198336 50 OCT 2008 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 141.01 315738 11/612008 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 125.35 DEFLECTOR KIT, REBUILD KITS 00005497 198337 65558500 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 125.35 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315739 111612008 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 444.65 ART SUPPLIES 00009424 198335 102308 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,050.00 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 8 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 444.65 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5820.6103 315740 1116/2Q08 2210.6124 101222 FRIEDRICHS, JIM COMMUNICATIONS 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5420.6406 149.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 1552.6530 198531 103008 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 149.95 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 5620.6406 315741 1116/2008 5842.5513 100764 G & K SERVICES YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 38.91 SHOP TOWELS 5842.5513 198338 1006222877 38.91 315742 1116/2008 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 199.45 MOUSE TRAPS, BAIT 198532 1012310981 199.45 315743 1116/2008 119936 GLOBAL OAK 93.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198339 540 93.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198339 540 93.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198339 540 337.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198339 540 618.75 315744 11/6/2008 105932 GOPROMOS 161.29 PENCILS 00005667 198227 1698367 161.29 315745 1116/2008 101103 GRAINGER 24.92 LAMPS 00006124 198228 9754555978 74.58 BATTERIES, GLUE, BRUSHES 00005875 198229 9760127572 90.64 AIR HOSE, AIR GUN 198394 9758551270 132.29 LAMPS 198395 9758551288 38.11 WATER HOSE 00002279 198533 9754364389 360.54 315746 1116/2008 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 154.25 198302 104746 140.00- 198303 104888 530.75 198412 104703 505.00 198476 104919 1,050.00 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 8 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY NA 1 810:36:13 R55CKREG .G20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315747 1116/2008 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 53.15 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 198602 110308 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 106.45 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 198602 110308 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.60 315748 1116/2008 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 38.35 BALLASTS 00002280 198534 937457857 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 124.03 BULBS AND BALLASTS 00002280 198535 937457856 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 162.38 315749 1116/2008 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 351.25 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00005953 198340 084211 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 351.25 315750 111612008 103508 GREER, BILL 308.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198380 102708 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 308.75 315751 11/612008 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 35.83 198304 134365 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 115.98 198305 134256 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,054.20 198306. 134443 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 770.42 198307 134436 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 38.31 198308 134375 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 35.83 198309 127933 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 164.19- 198310 762972 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,197.72 198413 134434 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,167.10 198414 132941 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 660.30 198415 134431 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 75.35 198416 134432 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,804.25 198477 134441 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,004.30 198478 134437 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 84.34- 198479 762974 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 69.10- 198480 762977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107.95- 198481 763423 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,534.01 315752 11/6/2008 118809 HALTARHUU, ERDENECHIMEG 48.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198381 102708 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 315753 1116/2008 103245 HALVERSON, JIM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1116/2008 - - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 89.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198341 103008 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 10 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD COURT CHARGES GRILL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 89.97 315754 1116/2008 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 178.76 REGISTER TAPE 00007516 198396 262035 5862.6512 178.76 315755 111612008 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,842.91 CHEMICALS 00005755 198342 1242565 5915.6586 3,438.55 CHEMICALS 00005755 198536 1243499 5915.6586 5,281.46 315756 11/6/2008 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 215.04 MEAT PATTIES 198458 021417 5421.5510 215.04 315757 11/6/2008 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 360.00 ROOM & BOARD - SEPT 2008 198459 2008 9 -EDINA 1195.6170 360.00 315758 11/6/2008 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 851.00 198417 468266 5842.5514 546.00 198579 468338 5862.5514 1,397.00 315759 11/6/2008 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 9,725.37 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 198537 3412961 5620.6230 27,679.88 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 198537 3412961 5510.6136 37,405.25 315760 11/612008 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 386.69 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 198538 103108 1120.6107 386.69 315761 1116/2008 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 149.58 PHONE DIRECTORY LISTINGS 198230 390013924832 5821.6188 149.58 PHONE DIRECTORY LISTINGS 198230 390013924832 5841.6188 149.59 PHONE DIRECTORY LISTINGS 198230 390013924832 5861.6188 448.75 315762 11/612008 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES 522.54 SYSTEM REPAIRS 198343 IESINV002031 1400.6215 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 10 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD COURT CHARGES GRILL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG _JG20000 CITY iNA Council Check Register 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description 1419.6102 2210.6103 1600.6575 1553.6530 1553.6530 5862.5514 5900.2015 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 1 . j8 10:36:13 Page - 11 Business Unit CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 522.54 315763 11/6/2008 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 198326 110608 100.00 315764 11/6/2008 123552 JAMIE ROTHER GRAPHIC DESIGN 150.00 POSTER DESIGN 198397 1 150.00 315765 11/6/2008 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 305.66 REGISTRATION FARMS 198231 44706 305.66 315766 11/6/2008 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 101.10 LIGHTS 00005951198344 0011466 124.32 VALVE STEM KITS 00005729 198345 0011113 225.42 315767 11/6/2008 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,550.20 198580 1211380 3,550.20 315768 1116/2008 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES 71.27 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 198387 103008 71.27 315770 11/6/2008 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 300.00 198311 1524703 333.81 198418 1528208 780.30 198419 1528210 1,761.96 198420 1528206 851.83 198421 1528205 25.33 198422 1528197 4,184.87 198423 1528209 4.00- 198424 397709 10.76- 198425 393069 671.58 198482 1528192 516.76 198483 1528191 1,750.22 198484 1528200 3,072.92 198485 1528202 102.62 198486 1528198 1419.6102 2210.6103 1600.6575 1553.6530 1553.6530 5862.5514 5900.2015 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 1 . j8 10:36:13 Page - 11 Business Unit CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Council Check Register Page - 12 11/6/2008 -- 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,057.70 198487 1528199 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 740.56 198488 1528204 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,016.61 198489 1528203 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 97.12 198490 1528196 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16.24 - 498491 397707 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.24- 198492 397708 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.66- 198493 397706 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.00- 198494 397447 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 463.95 198581 1528193 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 123.60 198582 1528190 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 337.34 198583 1528194 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 394.86 198584 1528195 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 22,529.04 315771 111612008 123554 JOHNSON, RAY 31.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 198386 102908 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 31.00 315772 11/6/2008 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 53.14 VACUUM BAGS 198232 176566 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 53.14 VACUUM BAGS 198232 176566 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 53.15 VACUUM BAGS 198232 176566 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 159.43 315773 1116/2008 111018 KEEPRS INC. 1,192.80 UNIFORMS 00003756 198539 100026 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.96 UNIFORMS 00003718 198540 102137 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,352.76 315774 1116/2008 121510 KRESOYA, BRUCE 132.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198541 103108 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 226.16 TRAINING EXPENSES 198542 103008 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 359.13 315775 111612008 102229 LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE 350.00 GRADING COURSE 00005879 198346 00152817 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 350.00 315776 11/6/2008 122517 LAWN PATROL 1,567.76 LAWN CARE 198398 203 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,567.76 CITY . .NA 1 8 10:36:13 R55CKREG _JG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315777 11/612008 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 264.99 HOLESAW, BOLTS, WASHERS 00005869 198347 7392075 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.99 315778 1116/2008 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 2,358.50 LIFELINE TRAINING 00005304 198543 LL -2459 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,358.50 315779 1116/2008 117681 LINDSTROM EMBROIDERY INC. - 281.45 UNIFORMS 00003757 198545 3244 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 281.45 315780 1116/2008 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE 862.76 SHADES 00003727 198544 62193H 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 862.76 315781 11/6/2008 100858 LOGIS 32.13 198233 29763/29788 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 1 792.23 198233 29763/29788 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 14.88 198234 29857/29888 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 624.00 198234 29857/29888 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,536.30 198234 29857/29888 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 14.62 198235 29960/29983 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 898.59 198235 29960129983 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,222.00 198235 29960/29983 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,253.61 198235 29960/29983 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6,388.36 315782 11/6/2008 101792 LUBE -TECH 303.44 LUBRICATING GREASE 00005865 198546 1590939 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 303.44 315783 11/612008 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 418.05 EVIDENCE BAGS 198348 189599 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 418.05 315784 11/612008 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,035.35 198312 49098 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,035.35 315785 11/6/2008 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 283.71 CLEANER, SPRAY BOTTLES 00003708 198548 1163 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 14 Business Unit 5842.5514 283.71 YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 315786 111612008 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100868 MARK VII SALES 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5910.6406 3,402.50 GENERAL (BILLING) 1550.6188 198313 390196 20.00 198314 389183 1,956.65 198315 389182 2,613.61 198585 389422 7,992.76 315787 11/6/2008 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 180.00 PHONE CHANGES 198236 45725 67.50 PROGRAMMING 198237 45536 67.50 REMOTE PROGRAMMING 198238 45537 180.00 PHONE CHANGES 198239 45377 262.12 PHONE CHANGES 198239 45377 67.50 REMOTE PROGRAMMING 198240 45518 824.62 315788 11/6/2008 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 894.60 PLANTS 00002275 198549 44385 894.60 315789 11/6/2008 101483 MENARDS 43.38 PRIMER, BRUSH SETS 00006126 198241 83375 33.92 DUCT TAPE, BLADES 00008048 198460 85240 191.49 LUMBER 00005937 198550 85287 268.79 315790 111612008 101987 MENARDS 17.26 DRILL BITS, ANCHORS 00002285 198551 34172 290.71 DEADBOLT LOCKS, OUTLETS 00002170 198552 34574 307.97 315791 111612008 123558 METRO PAVING INC. 2,900.00 ASPHALT REMOVAL & REPAVING 00005744 198461 5428 2,900.00 315792 1116/2008 100885 METRO SALES INC 267.71 COPIER USAGE 198349 303791 267.71 315793 11/6/2008 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 14 Business Unit 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY NA 1 810:36:13 R55CKREG _jG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 106.00 OFFICIATING FEES 198553 3420 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 106.00 315794 11/6/2008 .104650 MICRO CENTER 23.41 DUSTER, Y- SPLITTER 00004420 198242 1936108 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 23.41 315795 111612008 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 2,473.40 ASPHALT 00005748 198350 97028MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 2,473.40 315796 11/612008 122289 MIDWEST INTERIORS LLP 2,075.00 TABLE RESURFACING 00006132 198351 14835 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 2,075.00 315797 1116/2008 120742 MIKE MILLER TRUCKING INC. 844.00 MOVING CONVEYOR, CRUSHER 00005962 198547 12466 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 844.00 315798 11/612008 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 123.85 SLIM LINE CONTAINER 00005873 198352 5038932 -00 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 123.85 315799 1116/2008 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 118.09 CURB STOP WRENCHES 00005940 198554 0233286 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 118.09 315800 11/612008 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 666.66 NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 198244 56381 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 666.66 NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 198244 56381 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 666.68 NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 198244 56381 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,000.00 315801 11/6/2008 100898 MINVALCO 295.15 FLOW SWITCHES 00005862 198245 670979 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 494.27 BEARING 00005938 198555 673053 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 789.42 315802 1116/2008 120109 MONK, DEIDRE 246.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198556 102308 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 246.35 CITY OF EDINA 11/4/2008 10:36:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 11/6/2008 — 1116/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315803 11/612008 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 10/24/08 198504 103108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 315804 11/6/2008 103166 MSCA 15.00 2008 STATE OF RETAIL REPORT 198557 103108 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 15.00 315805 11/6/2008 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 514.40 STEERING VALVE 00006347 198353 643312 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,499.56 FERTILIZER 00006346 198354 643136 -00 5431.6540 FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 3,013.96 315806 11/6/2008 100916 MUZAK 207.54 MUSIC SERVICE 198462 A729154 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 207.54 315807 11/612008 121494 MY TELEPATH 241.06 TELEPHONE SWITCHES 198399 10 /17 /08STMT 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 241.06 315808 11/6/2008 105314 NAGC 120.00 NAGC MEMBERSHIP 198594 110308 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 420.00 CONTEST ENTRIES 198594 110308 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 540.00 315809 1116/2008 104431 NENA 75.00 MEMBERSHIP - L. DRAPER 198463 241131 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 315810 111612008 105061 NEW HORIZONS 2,475.00 2277/2278 TRAINING 198246 223256 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,475.00 . 315811 11/612008 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 20.44 SAFETY MANUALS 198400 134438 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 20.44 315812 1116/2008 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 198325 110608 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 1 d 10:36:13 Page - 17 Business Unit FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE FINANCE FINANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK ARENA ICE MAINT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY . NA R55CKREG -jG20000 Council Check Register 11/6/2008 — 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315813 1116/2008 106145 NOROQUIST SIGN COMPANY INC. 2,078.00 50% PMT ON SIGNS 198558 NIA3731 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,078.00 315814 11/612008 117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. 17,246.82 DE -ICING SALT 00005306 198355 70260930 1318.6525 SALT 8,508.73 DE -ICING SALT 00005306 198356 70261673 1318.6525 SALT 25,755.55 315815 111612008 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 298.00 UNIFORM PURCHASES 00005413 198606 NIA3731 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 298.00 315816 11/612008 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 10.38 ERASERS, SHARPIES 00009491 198357 36600900 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 10.38 315817 1116/2008 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 30.04 PENS, BINDERS 00006034 198247 447867551- 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.04 315818 11/6/2008 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 71.01 EYEBOLTS, SCREWDRIVERS 00005403 198358 526498 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES .88 NUTS 00005403 198359 526499 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.89 315819 111612008 120855 OLSON, VICKI 25.00 GPRS CONFERENCE 198559 102908 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 59.67 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 198559 102908 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 84.67 315820 11/6/2008 115669 ON CALL SERVICES _ 680.00 ADVENTURE PEAK REPAIR 198560 1879 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 680.00 315821 11/612008 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 1,099.00 COATS FOR PROS 198248 102808 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,099.00 315822 111612008 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 100.00 WINDOW TINTING 198464 186755 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00 1 d 10:36:13 Page - 17 Business Unit FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE FINANCE FINANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK ARENA ICE MAINT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 315824 11/612008 5862.5513 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrlption 315823 1116/2008 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS YORK SELLING 5842.5513 198249 1,296.20 198426 8201881 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,179.25 198427 8202280 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,031.77 198495 8202271 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 629.25 198496 8202274 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5421.5510 1643.6103 1470.6530 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1114/2008 10:36:13 Page - 18 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE 6,136.47 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 315824 11/612008 5862.5513 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 469.30 YORK SELLING 5842.5513 198249 47222201 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 469.30 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 315825 111612008 5822.5513 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 50TH ST SELLING 1,790.00 GRADING 00005749 198250 092408 1,790.00 315826 11/6/2008 120900 PETROGEN INC. 134.88 TIP NUTS, CUTTING TIPS 00003750 198561 15182 134.88 315827 1116/2008 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 184.08 198428 2673685 164.32 198429 2675830 1.12 198430 2675824 1,463.55 198431 2675829 4,909.81 198432 2675828 1,983.16 198497 2675825 1,154.34 198498 2675827 572.87 198499 2675826 91.58 198586 2675822 826.80 198587 2675823 1,475.18 198588 2675821 12,826.81 315828 11/6/2008 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 937.50 LIFEPAK MAINTENANCE 00003644 198562 PH475196 937.50 315829 11/6/2008 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 254.56 HOSE REPAIR 00006348 198360 S1245394.001 254.56 5421.5510 1643.6103 1470.6530 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1114/2008 10:36:13 Page - 18 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5431.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1 A 10:36:13 Page - 19 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 239.00 ELECTRICAL WORK CITY iNA 45008.6710 R55CKREG .G20000 FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 239.00 Council Check Register 315832 11/612008 100965 PRIMESCAPE PRODUCTS 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315830 111612008 GENERAL SUPPLIES 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 84.15 130.00 SCRAP TIRE PICK UP 00005641 198251 248621 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 274.02 TIRES 00005641 198252 303321 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 404.02 247.95 198316 134438 315831 111612008 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 108681 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY 744.60 1 A 10:36:13 Page - 19 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 239.00 ELECTRICAL WORK 198563 21654 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 239.00 315832 11/612008 100965 PRIMESCAPE PRODUCTS 84.15 PLANTSHINE 198564 253255 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 84.15 315833 111612008 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 247.95 198316 134438 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 744.60 198433 134442 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 612.15 198434 134433 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,604.70 315834 11/6/2008 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 805.00 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 00004506 198253 52420 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 805.00 315835 11/612008 100971 QUALITY WINE 81.60 198317 077937 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,595.82 198318 077693 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,506.30 198435 078017 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,338.05 198436 077692 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,129.70 198437 078398 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,003.02 198438 077936 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,670.84 198439 077935 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.96- 198440 073874 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 137.60 198441 078397 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,481.85 198442 078016-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.33- 198443 069658 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.40- 198444 070968 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,665.53 198500 077700 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 579.47 198501 078005 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 28,046.09 315836 11/6/2008 101965 QWEST 40.08 952 922 -9246 198361 9246 -10/08 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 298.29 CITY OF EDINA 315837 Council Check Register 106036 REITER, JERRY 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 124.48 952 927 -8861 198603 8861 -10/08 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 78.49 952 929 -9549 198604 9549 -10/08 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 55.24. 952 929 -0297 198605 0297 -10/08 4090.6188 TELEPHONE LAUNDRY LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 20 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY STREET REVOLVING BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 298.29 315837 11/6/2008 106036 REITER, JERRY 174.75 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198254 102808 1646.6201 68.59 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198362 103008 1646.6201 243.34 315838 1116/2008 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 608.12 SOFTENER SALT 00008042 198255 00213522 5511.6406 608.12 315839 1116/2008 102040 RYGG, JAMES 131.16 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198363 102408 1400.6203 131.16 315840 1116/2008 100305 SARA LEE FOOD SERVICES 547.90 COFFEE 198256 81442884 5421.5510 547.90 315841 11/6/2008 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 627.75 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 198595 8102207167 1628.6103 619.44 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 00005966 198596 8102208303 1375.6103 1,247.19 315842 1116/2008 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 173.32 TRAINING EXPENSES 198465 103008 1400.6104 173.32 315843 11/6/2008 102870 SEIFERT, ELIZABETH 105.95 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198382 102708 5101.4413 105.95 315844 1116/2008 103249 SHANNON, JIM 110.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 11/11/09 198506 103108 5610.6136 110.00 315845 1116/2008 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 135.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198383 102708 5101.4413 135.20 LAUNDRY LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 20 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY STREET REVOLVING BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 11/09/08 198505 103108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 510.00 CITY . NA 1 d 10:36:13 R55CKREG .G20000 3151148 111612008 101000 SIR SPEEDY Council Check Register 45.00 Page - 21 58808 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 45.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315846 1116/2008 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 123559 SIERRA - PACIFIC SOFTWARE 149.00 TRAINING SOFTWARE 198466 911 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 149.00 5,081.00 4TH QTR OPERATING FEES 198597 8087 1400.6221 315847 1116/2008 121382 SIGNATURE AQUATICS 8,761.00 51000 AFO TRAINING COURSES 198565 AFO0810GO13 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 11/09/08 198505 103108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 510.00 3151148 111612008 101000 SIR SPEEDY 45.00 BUSINESS CARDS 198467 58808 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.00 315849 11/6/2008 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 3,680.00 4TH QTR OPERATING FEES 198597 8087 1470.6221 RANGE RENTAL . 5,081.00 4TH QTR OPERATING FEES 198597 8087 1400.6221 RANGE RENTAL 8,761.00 315850 11/6/2008 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 287.63 FREEZER REPAIR 00006340 198257 70908 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 287.63 315851 11/6/2008 105193 SPAIN, MARK 95.00 STUMP REMOVAL 00005950 198364 EDINAI 1365.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.00 315852 11/6/2008 121375 SPARTAN GROUP LLC 213.30 STAPHACIDE 00008051 198468 1106 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 213.30 315853 11/6/2008 104672 SPRINT 81.98 DATA CARDS 198258 666109817 -011 5910.6188 TELEPHONE 81.98 DATA CARDS 198258 666109817 -011 1322.6188 TELEPHONE 163.96 315854 11/6/2008 101004 SPS COMPANIES 109.75 BURNER ASSEMBLY 00005858 198365 S1933453.001 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 109.75 315855 11/612008 103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 11/09/08 198505 103108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315856 11/612008 115620 STANTON GROUP 630.00 ACTUARIAL SERVICES 198566 367302 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES DEPT UNIFORMS 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 22 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 630.00 315857 11/612008 101015 STREICHERS 39.99 198366 1556524 1400.6203 39.99- 198367 CM228758 1400.6203 624.00 REPLACE LAPTOP DOCKING STATION 198368 1557645 1400.6406 89.43 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003754 198567 1562286 1470.6510 625.00 HIGH VISIBILITY PARKAS 00003626 198568 1562503 1470.6558 1,338.43 315858 11/6/2008 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 849.86 VOICE/DATA WIRING 198259 13382 44005.6710 849.86 315859 1116/2008 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 88.72 MUD FLAPS 00005184 198569 133603CVW 1553.6530 88.72 315860 11/6/2008 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 198324 110608 1419.6102 100.00 315861 11/6/2008 120560 SWEE, CINDY 46.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198384 102708 5101.4413 46.80 315862 11/6/2008 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 37.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 198260 596914 5421.6102 37.00 315863 1116/2008 101027 TARGET 52.33 CAMERA EQUIPMENT, PENS 00006131 198261 101808 5410.6406 52.33 315864 111612008 113549 TENNIS WEST 7,490.00 RESALVAGE BATTING CAGE 00005291 198262 08 -7774 1642.6180 7,490.00 315865 11/6/2008 123560 THELEN HEATING AND ROOFING INC UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES DEPT UNIFORMS 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 22 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE CITY I NA 1 . d 10:36:13 R55CKREG .G20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptlon Business Unit 210.00 HEATER SERVICING 198570 48550 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 210.00 315866 11/6/2008 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 67.50 RESET PROJECTOR 198401 543140 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 67.50 315867 11/6/2008 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 198263 2008 -15197 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 198263 2008 -15197 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 198263 2008 -15197 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 315868 1116/2008 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 1,282.34 UNIFORMS 198571 10757 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,282.34 315869 111612006 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 581.86 ASSEMBLY CYLINDER 00005898 198264 44042 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 581.86 315870 11/612008 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 862.15 SPRINGS, PLUGS, COUPLER 00005952 198369 304256 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 862.15 315871 11/6/2008 102328 UNIMED MIDWEST INC. 246.35 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003692 198572 0059631 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 246.35 315872 11/6/2008 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC 539.10 SIGN REPAIRS 198370 43765 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 539.10 315873 11/6/2008 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 7.19 INV #1243 198265 100908 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 8.04 INV #1236 198265 100908 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 15.23 315874 11/612008 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 283.10 TRACER WIRE ACCESS BOXES 00005816 198266 694229 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 283.10 R55CKREG LOG20000 660.69 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/6/2008 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315875 11/612008 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 102908 5901.4626 598.74 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 198371 100064 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 23.71- CREDIT 00007512 198372 099319CM 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 8.38- CREDIT 00007513 198373 099317CM 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 94.04 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 198402 088010 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES SALE OF WATER 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 24 Business Unit T UMN ACLLIMV YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING UTILITY REVENUES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAUNDRY CRAFT SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING 660.69 315876 11/6/2008 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC 479.70 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 198374 102908 5901.4626 479.70 315877 11/6/2008 119612 VIDEO GUIDANCE INC. 399.38 TANDBERG INSTALLATION 198573 082324 45008.6710 399.38 315878 11/612008 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 42.82 LIGHTING 00005811 198267 15113548 -01 1646.6406 218.73 BALLASTS 00005880 198268 15114297 -00 1322.6406 92.45 LIGHTING 00005939 198269 15113343 -01 1322.6406 198.48 LIGHTING 00005811 198270 15113548 -00 1646.6406 381.49 LIGHTS 00005893 198375 15114577 -00 1330.6406 933.97 315879 11/6/2008 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 198323 110608 1419.6102 100.00 315880 111612008 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 4,181.03 REFUSE 198598 4777255- 2282 -5 4095.6103 3,687.01 REFUSE 198599 4771032 - 2282 -4 4095.6103 7,868.04 315881 11/6/2008 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID 92.85 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198574 103108 1646.6201 92.85 315882 11/6/2008 116768 WET PAINT INC. 36.40 ART SUPPLIES 00009422 198376 011994 5110.6564 36.40 315883 11/6/2008 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 703.71 IAAO SEMINAR EXPENSES 198271 102708 1190.6104 SALE OF WATER 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Page - 24 Business Unit T UMN ACLLIMV YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING UTILITY REVENUES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAUNDRY CRAFT SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING R55CKREG -PG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 703.71 198448 315884 11/6/2008 5842.5513 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE YORK SELLING 808.25 219245 5862.5513 749.70 VERNON SELLING 198600 316.20 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,874.15 198276 315885 11/6/2008 5111.6185 101312 WINE MERCHANTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,327.56 172357837 1321.6185 498.05 STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 198278 1,361.12 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,186.73 198279 315886 1116/2008 1322.6185 123556 WOODDALE BUILDERS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 70.09 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 1460.6185 70.09 CIVILIAN DEFENSE 315887 11/6/2008 172537532 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC LIGHT & POWER 857.65 198282 172553684 669.75 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 711.70 172526065 5913.6185 2,239.10 DISTRIBUTION 315888 11/6/2008 112752 WPS- MEDICARE PART B 343.31 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 343.31 315889 11/6/2008 101726 XCEL ENERGY 369.64 51- 8324712 -5 27.96 51- 6892224 -5 56.05 51- 4420190 -3 1,043.06 51- 6223269 -1 1,087.50 51- 5107681-4 88.03 51- 4621797 -2 8.52 51- 6050184 -2 78.11 51- 8526048 -8 54.92 51- 6692497-0 1,859.74 51- 5547446 -1 11.08 51- 6541084 -2 112.74 51- 5005454 -3 CITY oNA Council Check Register 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1 A 10:36:13 Page - 25 198319 204539 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 198445 204415 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 198446 204542 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198447 250591 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198502 250589 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 198503 250590 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 198469 103008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 198320 219240 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 198448 219238 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 198449_ 219245 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198600 ELAINE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 198276 COLBENSON 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 198272 172423128 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 198273 172398433 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 198274 172188727 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 198275 172383871 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 198276 172359637 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 198277 172357837 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 198278 172379912 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 198279 172427331 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 198280 172558571 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 198281 172537532 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 198282 172553684 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 198283 172526065 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/4/2008 10:36:13 Council Check Register Page - 26 11/6/2008 — 11/6/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,948.23 51- 4159265 -8 198403 172186575 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 317.74 51 -4827232 -6 198470 172859996 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 34.55 51- 8102668 -0 198471 172928266 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 30,528.34 51- 4621797 -2 198472 172854367 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,022.67 51- 5847121 -5 198607 173215335 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 38,648.88 315890 11/6/2008 103584 XPEDX 526.92 LETTERHEAD STOCK 198601 N343429811 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 526.92 315891 1118/2008 118994 ZAMORA, DAWN 80.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198385 102708 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 80.60 315892 111612008 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 485.83 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 198575 54164551 5610.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION 142.10 ICE PACKS 198576 54164552 5610.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION 627.93 366,360.68 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 366,360.68 Total Payments 366,360.68 R55CKSUM [0000 CITY � 4A Councll Check Summary 11/6/2008 - 11/6/2008 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 142,198.49 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,079.54 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 14,595.88 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,075.04 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,070.74 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 322.53 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,915.57 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 30,916.20 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 15,446.46 05800 LIQUOR FUND 130,628.94 05900 UTILITY FUND 8,833.74 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,277.55 Report Totals 366,360.68 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing pol nd Procedures data I U,f � �n <�- 11 ! 10:37:36 Page - 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -.4A Council Check Register 11113/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315893 11/13/2008 123574 ABRAMS & SCHMIDT LLC 450.00 POST CLASSES 198905 123 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 450.00 315894 11/13/2008 119577 ACCESS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,818.45 REPOSITION CABLE VAULT 198676 11512 07048.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,818.45 315895 1111312008 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 55.60 198739 0311446 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 87.12 198740 0311448 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 142.72 315896 11113/2008 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 149.82 STROBE LIGHT BULBS 198906 5974 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 356.78 INSTALL CAMERA SYSTEM 198907 5970 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 506.60 315897 11/1312008 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 717.71. READY MIX 00005752 198609 4235806 1314.6520 CONCRETE 256.38 READY MIX 00005752 198610 4235601 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 271.55 READY MIX 00005752 198611 4235807 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 542.95 READY MIX 00005752 198677 4236335 1314.6520 CONCRETE 1,788.59 315898 11/13/2008 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 101.56 SCOREBOARD REPAIRS 199050 32084 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 101.56 315899 11/1312008 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 246.80 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 198951 5605 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 246.80 315900 11/13/2008 101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 164.54 198989 35320 -10/08 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 208.76 198990 59056 -10/08 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 120.80 198991 35314 -10108 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 57.01 198992 35334 -10/08 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 375.06 198993 46 -10/08 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 512.00 198994 52194 -10108 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 142.50 198995 16813 -10/08 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 1,580.67 11/1__.,815:32:16 Page - 1 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SO48 SIDEWALK 100 W FRONTAGE R 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET RENOVATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE STREET RENOVATION ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES EDINBOROUGH PARK YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 2 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315901 11/13/2008 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 554.33 COPIER PAPER 198908 10180519 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 554.33 315902 11/1312008 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 591.40 FOOD 00006333 198612 1049341 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 591.40 315903 11/13/2008 101566 APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 118.50 APPRAISAL PUBLICATIONS 198792 MEM85749 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 118.50 315904 11113/2008 103065 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 234.47 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005462 198678 28856 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 387.28 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005452 198679 28855 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 106.25 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005453 198680 28621 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 345.10 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005455 198681 28620 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 261.69 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005454 196682 28617 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 1,334.79 315905 11/13/2008 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 227.71 COFFEE 198793 410614 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 312.00 COFFEE 199048 410531 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 539.71 315906 1111312008 119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 30.00 EBROCHURE 00006141 199049 13514 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 30.00 315907 11/1312008 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 227.87 WASTE DISPOSAL 198952 1- 146354 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 227.87 315908 11/13/2008 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 44.60 198794 870517029X11040 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 8 44.60 315909 11/13/2008 106015 ATHLETICA INC. 702.90 PVC PIPE 00005751 198953 0027393 -IN 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 150.81 BOTTOM NET CLAMPS 00005764 199051 0027418 -IN 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAI' 'NCE CITY OF EDINA 11/12/2u0815:32:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 853.71 315910 11/13/2008 100638 BACHMAN'S 511.73 BUSHES 00005397 198834 8200 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 198.89 PLANTS 00005397 198835 8180 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 2,195.92 BUSHES 00005394 198836 32097 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 323.46- RETURN 198837 4245 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,583.08 315911 11113/2008 100642 BANNERS TO GO 15.98 ADOPT -A -PARK SIGN 00005757 198613 27237 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 202.35 SIGNS 00005404 198614 27242 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 218.33 315912 11113/2008 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 886.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 198615 232701-173.02 -2 05483.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WMA83 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX 886.14 315913 1111312008 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 219.67 198741 81514200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 886.91 198742 46732300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 632.60 198743 46768000 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107.55 198744 46768100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING •241.64 198745 81514100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,088.37 315914 1111312008 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 780.00 SNOW REMOVAL - NOV 2008 198954 132864 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 780.00 315915 11/13/2008 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 34.89 CALCULATOR PAPER ROLLS 198616 WO- 531694 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 53.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 198795 WO- 531140 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 6.99 SORTWIK 198796 WO- 532192 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 198797 WO- 532322 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 143.57 315916 1111312008 121619 BLANEK, HARRY 45.57 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 196955 110308 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45.57 315917 11113/2008 119431 BLINK BONNIE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 4 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 45.70 BOX LUNCHES 198798 1363 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 45.70 315918 11113/2008 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 10.65 FREIGHT 00005535 199095 235446 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.18- CREDIT 00005906 199096 245159 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.25 SENSOR ASSEMBLY, SEALANT 00005906 199097 245159 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.81 HINGE 00005900 199098 243187X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 114.52 SENDER 00005904 199099 244334 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.05 315919 11/13/2008 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,343.95 198746 13250 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 24.70 198747 13249 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 608.20 198748 13248 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,000.00 198749 13159 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,976.85 315920 11/13/2008 111089 CARLSON, ERIC 56.50 EMT COURSE EXPENSES 199052 110708 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 56.50 315921 11/13/2008 121654 CARLSON, JACKIE 59.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198785 110408 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 59.80 315922 11/13/2008 123561 CATALYST GRAPHICS INC. 31.95 GRAPHIC ARTS SERVICES 00007068 198617 65272 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 31.95 315923 11/13/2008 100681 CATCO 248.02 PRESSURE SWITCHES 00005905 198618 3 -62312 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 164.80 PIGGYBACK 00005646 198619 90 -24751 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 599.38 PIGGYBACKS, BRAKE CHAMBERS 00005646 198620 3 -61909 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.25- CREDIT 198621 3 -59844 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,006.95 315924 11/13/2008 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 224.27 DIGITAL CAMERA 00004420 198799 MBT0357 1552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 54.78 SCANNER HOLDERS 00004411 198800 LXL3180 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 255.08 ADOBE ACROBAT 00004424 198801 - MC04607 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19.77 CABLES 00004428 198802 MCS3638 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING' R55CKREG LOG20000 1,127.18 CITY OF EDINA 315925 Council Check Register 123569 CHASE, KATHLEEN 11/13/2008 -- 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 255.08 ADOBE ACROBAT 00004426 198803 MCX1105 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 347.51 SCANNERS 00004411 198804 LWWJ8882 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.31- RETURN 00004411 198805 LZF0329 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CUSTOMER REFUND 11/121200815:32:16 Page - 5 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL (BILLING) UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CUSTOMER REFUND COMMUNICATIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL 1,127.18 315925 11113/2008 123569 CHASE, KATHLEEN 114.77 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 198789 110408 5900.2015 114.77 315926 11/13/2008 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 232.50 198750 377531 5842.5514 232.50 315927 11113/2008 123148 CHRISTIANSEN, STEVE 66.11 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 199053 111008 2210.6107 66.11 315928 11/13/2008 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.51 WINDOW CLEANING 198956 431545 5861.6180 16.62 WINDOW CLEANING 198956 431545 5821.6180 25.99 WINDOW CLEANING 198956 431545 5841.6180 57.12 315929 1111312008 123571 CLARK, TERRY 25.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 198790 110408 5900.2015 25.00 315930 11/13/2008 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 416.60 198996 0108088205 5822.5515 416.60 315931 11/13/2008 119839 CORNEJO CONSULTING 3,800.00 CONSULTING - COMP PLAN 198806 110108 1140.6103 3,800.00 315932 11/13/2008 103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC. 1,105.24 TONER/PRINTER CARTRIDGES 199054 91398425 1550.6406 1,105.24 315933 11/13/2008 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 198807 7070136482 1551.6103 2,742.38 CUSTOMER REFUND 11/121200815:32:16 Page - 5 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL (BILLING) UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CUSTOMER REFUND COMMUNICATIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 6 11/13/2008 -- 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315934 11113/2008 104020 DALCO 104.90 CARB CLEANER 00005874 198683 2037516 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 662.43 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008050 198957 2038373 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 209.67 GRILL CLEANER, COMET 00006142 199055 2038374 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 977.00 315935 11/13/2008 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,203.66 198751 479399 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,184.40 198752 480319 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 240.00 198753 480265 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,832.70 198997 480390 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 339.00 198998 480264 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,799.76 315936 11/1312008 123563 DEAN BJORKSTRAND INC. 350.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 198684 8102 07100.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN S100 HALIFAX AV - 51ST TO 54TH 350.00 315937 11/13/2008 101657 DEHN, BRUCE , 19.00 UPGRADE DRIVERS LICENSE 198622 110308 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 19.00 315938 11/1312008 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 354.11 POWERLUBERS 00005189 198623 332491 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 350.15 BATTERY BRUSHES 00005189 198624 332549 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 704.26 315939 1111312008 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 153.27 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 199056 111008 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 153.27 315940 11113/2008 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 44.14 BAKERY 198625 286365 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 85.87 BAKERY 198626 286377 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 86.50 BAKERY 198808 286585 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 216.51 315941 11/13/2008 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 8,220.34 SURCHARGE OCT 2008 198685 5291053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 8,220.34 11 /1i._- ..615:32:16 Page - 7 Business Unit PATHS & HARD SURFACE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING WM-477 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EUiNA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315942 1111312008 100420 DOGGIE WALK BAGS 547.00 DISPENSER BAGS 00005747 198627 200810404 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 547.00 315943 11113/2008 121679 DULANY, PAT 20.00 BOILER OPERATOR LICENSE 199057 111008 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 20.00 315944 11/13/2008 100739 EAGLE WINE 193.05 198754 138160 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,171.14 198848 138157 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 599.18 198849 136809 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,996.25 198850 136921 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 263.75 198851 138166 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6,223.37 315945 11113/2008 123562 EDGAR, BRETT & NADINE 28.00 REIMBURSE PARKING TICKET 198666 110308 05477.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 28.00 315946 11113/2008 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 76.68 OCT WASHES 198909 3598 1553.6238 CAR WASH 76.68 315947 1111312008 119000 EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC. 333.33 GALA FUNDRAISER SPONSORSHIP 198958 1007 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 333.33 GALA FUNDRAISER SPONSORSHIP 198958 1007 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 333.34 GALA FUNDRAISER SPONSORSHIP 198958 1007 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,000.00 315948 11/13/2008 102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA 53.20 GET WELL FLOWERS 198628 4818 1'504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 53.20 315949 11/13/2008 123606 FRENCH, JOHN 320.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 199086 111008 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 320.00 315950 11/13/2008 102456 GALLS INC. 187.03 BINOCULARS 198910 5961975901016 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 187.03 11 /1i._- ..615:32:16 Page - 7 Business Unit PATHS & HARD SURFACE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING WM-477 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11113/2008 -11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315951 11/13/2008 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 147.15 UNIFORM PURCHASES 00005581 198629 1012340669 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 1644.6541 1644.6541 5310.6103 5620.6103 5110.6103 2210.6124 5913.6103 1301.6180 1646.6103 1553.6530 5913.6406 1553.6556 5111.6406 1553.6610 5913.6610 1301.6610 1646.6610 5862.5513 5822.5513 PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEB DEVELOPMENT 11/12/200815:32:16 Page - 8 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE POOL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 147.15 315952 11/13/2008 103185 GERTENS 12.76 PLANTINGS 00005546 198959 160042 149.10 PLANTINGS 00005309 198960 159114 161.86 315953 11/13/2008 119936 GLOBAL OAK 37.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198687 525 75.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198687 525 262.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198687 525 675.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 198687 525 1,050.00 315954 11/13/2008 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,136.80 OCT SERVICE 00005834 198838 8100458 1,136.80 315955 11/1312008 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 112.89 REMOVE PAINT ON DRIVEWAY 00005974 198630 319 169.34 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00005763 198961 322 282.23 315956 11/1312008 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 504.33 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 00005191 198631 61607 504.33 315957 11113/2008 101103 GRAINGER 40.16 SCREWDRIVER SET 00005943 198632 9765584249 78.09 PLIERS 00005947 198633 9766352687 32.68 FIXTURE 00005945 198634 9766352679 64.13 SAFETY GLASSES, EARMUFFS 00005947 198635 9766795539 64.13 SAFETY GLASSES, EARMUFFS 00005947 198635 9766795539 100.00 SAFETY GLASSES, EARMUFFS 00005947 198635 9766795539 100.00 SAFETY GLASSES, EARMUFFS 00005947 198635 9766795539 479.19 315958 11/13/2008 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 678.25 198852 104918 330.75 198999 405131 1644.6541 1644.6541 5310.6103 5620.6103 5110.6103 2210.6124 5913.6103 1301.6180 1646.6103 1553.6530 5913.6406 1553.6556 5111.6406 1553.6610 5913.6610 1301.6610 1646.6610 5862.5513 5822.5513 PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEB DEVELOPMENT 11/12/200815:32:16 Page - 8 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE POOL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 11/1;,, - 8I5:32:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300.50 199000 105133 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,309.50 315959 1111312006 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 564.28 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001825 198688 084217 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 249.05 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005377 198689 084219 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 840.36 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005376 198690 084220 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 364.92 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005379 198691 084226 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 361.26 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005372 198692 084523 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 264.17 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005384 198693 084524 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 450.40 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001840 198694 084526 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 357.86 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005373 198695 084527 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 2,584.09 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001845 198696 084227 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 89.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001857 198697 083975 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 6,125.39 315960 11113/2008 118195 GREEN HORIZONS 69.74 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005436 198698 125632 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 69.74 315961 11/1312008 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1,060.62 198755 138164 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 68.35 198756 138162 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 788.10 198757 138161 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,953.55 198758 134366 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 163.13 198759 136274 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8.00- 198760 763357 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,305.68 198853 136923 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,577,28 198854 138169 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 68.41 198855 138168 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 162.02 198856 138030 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,289.95 198857 138158 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,307.60 198858 138167 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 152.10 198859 136846 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,577.50 198660 136922 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,331.05 198861 134367 5862.5512 COST OE GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,214.80 198862 138159 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 37,012.14 315962 11113/2008 100155 GRITTON, KAY 143.65 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198786 110408 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 143.65 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page- 10 11/13/2008 — 11/1312008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315963 11113/2008 114566 HARTKE, BRENDA 49.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198787 110408 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 49.40 315964 11/13/2008 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 16,782.69 DIESEL GASOLINE 00001437 198636 103620 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16,782.69 315965 11/13/2008 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 352.60 3/4 CURB STOPS 00005831 198637 8162516 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,576.33 CORP STOPS & CURB STOPS 00005833 198699 8162520 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,928.93 315966 11/13/2008 118%64 HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY 1,285.04 FUNGICIDE 00006349 199058 134712394 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 1,285.04 315967 11/13/2008 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 4,014.44 RADIO ADMIN FEE / INSTALL 198962 28108423 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,014.44 315968 11/13/2008 101717 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 215.00 UTILITY PERMIT - WELL #20 00005832 198638 UTIL01035 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 215.00 315969 11/13/2008 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,403.00 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 198639 QB7514 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,403.00 315970 11/1312008 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE - 95.00 EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS TRAINING 198700 00160985 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 95.00 315971 11/13/2008 101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 519.72 STAND, SIGN, BRACE 00005885 198640 65003571 -001 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 519.72 315972 11/1312008_ 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 342.14 CLEANERS /DISINFECTANT 00002286 198963 2666853 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 75.04- RETURN 198964 8098542 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 267.10 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF —.4A Council Check Register 11/13/2008 — 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315973 11113/2008 102483 HILTI INC. 213.44 LASER RANGE METER 00005936 198641 1605571143 1301.6556 TOOLS CONSULTING DESIGN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER KENNEL SERVICE CHEMICALS 11/1— .615:32:16 Page- 11 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING ANIMAL CONTROL EDINBOROUGH PARK SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 213.44 315974 11/13/2008 123568 HOFF CONSTRUCTION 680.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 198809 FREDHOFF 01342.1705.20 680.00 315975 11/1312008 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,328.45 198761 468948 5842.5514 12.60 199001 468994 5822.5515 530.00 199001 468994 5822.5514 837.40 199002 469037 5862.5514 2,708.45 315976 11/13/2008 101618 HOPKINS PET HOSPITAL 8,331.56 IMPOUNDS, CREMATIONS 198911 288777 1450.6217 8,331.56 315977 11113/2008 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 767.87 CAL HYPOCHLORITE 00002288 198965 8102903 5620.6545 767.87 315978 11/13/2008 105007 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY 557.72 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 198912 0112459 -11/01 1400.6230 557.72 315979 11/1312008 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 1,317.42 W 70TH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT 198701 81333 1265.6406 1,317.42 315980 11/1312008 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 126.08 FENCE REPAIR 00005389 198913 113969 01213.1705.20 93.05 FENCE REPAIR 00005432 198914 113567 01213.1705.20 189.68- CREDIT ON ACCT 198915 DUPLICATE PYMTS 05436.1705.30 29.45 315981 11113/2008 102024 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC. 209.48 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005434 198702 00126287 01213.1705.20 209.48 CONSULTING DESIGN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER KENNEL SERVICE CHEMICALS 11/1— .615:32:16 Page- 11 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING ANIMAL CONTROL EDINBOROUGH PARK SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 315982 11/13/2008 315983 11/13/2008 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11113/2008 -- 11/13/2008 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 79.50 WEATHERHEADS 00005832 198966 4198803 -01 1322.6530 79.50 101612 JACK RICHESON & CO. INC. 106.62 ART SUPPLIES 00009414 198810 0377509 -IN 106.62 315984 11/13/2008 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 550.00 ANNUAL RETAINER FEES 198703 20038707 550.00 5120.5510 5310.6103 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 315985 11/13/2008 102146 JESSEN PRESS 355.57 ROAD CONSTRUCTION BROCHURES 198811 7213 01356.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 355.57 ROAD CONSTRUCTION BROCHURES 198811 7213 01357.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 355.57 ROAD CONSTRUCTION BROCHURES 198811 7213 01358.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 355.57 ROAD CONSTRUCTION BROCHURES 198811 7213 01359.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 355.58 ROAD CONSTRUCTION BROCHURES 198811 7213 01360.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 355.58 ROAD CONSTRUCTION BROCHURES 198811 7213 01361.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 383.40 LETTERHEAD 199059 8739 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2.516.84 199094 901412 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11/121200815:32:16 Page - 12 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP POOL ADMINISTRATION BA -356 MIRROR LAKES WHOOD BA -357 FAIRFAX N'HOOD BA -358 S GARDEN ESTATES N'HOOD BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD BA- 361 1NTERLACHEN CIRCLE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 315986 11/13/2008 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,422.40 198762 1211382 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 44.00 198763 1211381 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 10,922.20 198764 1211390 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,971.52 199003 1221022 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,461.41 199004 1221021 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 10,891.09 199005 1221030 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.60 199006 . 1221031 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6.00 199094 901412 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 36,775.22 315988 11/13/2008 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.12 198863 1524422 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,516.55 198864 1528207 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 198865 1532006 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,063.02 198866 1532023 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,531.85 198867 1532005 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 675.72 198868 1532018 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 198869 1532008 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,723.49 198870 1532021 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EUINA 11/1;,,- u815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 13 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 263.92 773.11 697.54 627.28 97.12 25.92- 661.64 759.43 402.58 696.00 1.12 1,245.18 31.37 328.47 424.34 4,041.53 771.74 252.32 148.90 35.37 8,331.40 105.12 4.48 2.24 977.58 6,157.54 3,202.28 5,606.94 76.62 560.00 54,773.47 315989 11/13/2008 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 84.93 UNIFORM PURCHASE 84.93 315990 11113/2008 117656 KARAS TECHNICAL 131.27 REPAIRS 131.27 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 198871 1529054 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198872 1532020 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198873 1532019 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198874 1532022 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198875 1532007 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198876 398735 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 199007 1531993 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 199008 1531996 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 199009 1531995 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 199010 1531994 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 199011 1531998 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 199012 1531997 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 199013 1531999 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 199014 1532000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 199015 1532656 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199016 1532014 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199017 1532013 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199018 1532012 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 199019 1532002 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199020 1532017 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 199021 1532015 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 'YORK SELLING 199022 1532009 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 199023 1532004 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 199024 1532003 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 199025 15320014 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 199026 1532016 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 199027 1532010 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199028 1528201 5842,5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 199029 1532011 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 199030 1528510 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 198704 103108 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 198916 12035 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 315991 11113/2008 100553 KEEHR, GREGORY 68.95 ALARM BATTERIES 198917 110508 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/13/2008 — 11113/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 68.95 315992 11/1312008 111018 KEEPRS INC. 44.67 UNIFORMS 00003733 198967 102338 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 44.67 315993 1111312008 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 168.00 OCT SERVICE 198812 100108 168.00 315994 1111312008 100354 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 1,197.60 CLAY 00009419 198813 22957 1,197.60 315995 11/1312008 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 85.93 FUEL FILTER, OIL 00002070 198918 188728 85.93 315996 1111312008 123096 LASER TECHNOLOGIES INC. 677.34 CITATION ENVELOPES 198919 79609 677.34 315997 1111312008 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 250.78 WASHERS, SCREWS, CLAMPS 00005895 198705 7416203 250.78 315998 11/13/2008 101887 LEAGUE OF MINN HUMAN RIGHTS CO 246.75 LEAGUE DUES 198920 110108 246.75 315999 1111312008 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 2,246.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 198968 29665 2,246.00 316000 1111312008 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 252.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 198814 122605 252.00 316001 11/13/2008 123570 LOFGREN CADE, SARA 12.94 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 198791 110408 12.94 11/12/200815:32:16 Page- 14 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1504.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 7410.6200 INSURANCE PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -_..4A Council Check Register 11/1312008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 316002 11/1312008 123573 LOGIN I IACP NET 1 100.00 ANNUAL FEE - ACCT 5092 198921 10958 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER 11/1- .415:32:16 Page - 15 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,100.00 316003 11/13/2008 101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC. 18.00 WINE SPECTATOR 198815 985564 5822.6105 18.00 316004 1111312008 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 11.66 SOD, STONE 198706 103108 5932.6406 194.66 SOD, STONE 198706 103108 1314.6406 5,052.40 SOD, STONE 198706 103108 1344.6577 5,258.72 316005 11/1312008 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 470.73 JANITORIAL SERVICE 198969 C002925 7411.6103 470.73 316006 11/13/2008 121282 MANOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION IN 1,197.00 REPLACE DRIVEWAY SECTIONS 198707 184401 1301.6180 1,197.00 316007 11/13/2008 100868 MARK VII SALES 4,341.90 198765 392748 5842.5514 1,683.10 198766 391731 5822.5514 2,213.70 198767 392249 5862.5514 276.00 198768 391973 5862.5515 3,544.00 198769 389683 5862.5514 2,720.39 198770 391953 5842.5514 4,982.89 199031 391972 5862.5514 2,395.25 199032 399207 5842.5514 17.40- 199033 _000772 5862.5514 22,139.83 316008 11/13/2008 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 547.10 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 00001045 198839 457986 1552.6103 547.10 316009 11/13/2008 103287 MCPA 45.00 2009 DUES - AMY GRANNES 198922 110608 1400.6105 45.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER 11/1- .415:32:16 Page - 15 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 16 11/13/2008 —11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 316010 11/13/2008 101483 MENARDS 26.60 PAINT 00006127 198642 83762 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 10.10 FILTER 00001790 198643 84203 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 316.50 LUMBER, BLADES, SCREWS 00005752 198816 86283 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 135.18 PAINT, LUMBER 00002291 198970 86792 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 91.05 HARDBOARD, TIEDOWNS 00006239 199060 85314 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 579.43 316011 11113/2008 101987 MENARDS 77.98 GLOVES, ROOF CABLE 00002069 198923 3517767 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 77.96 316012 11/13/2008 100885 METRO SALES INC 1,608.06 COPIER USAGE 198977 306385 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,608.06 316013 11/1312008 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 132.50 OFFICIATING FEES 199087 3427 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 132.50 316014 11/13/2008 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 84,194.55 SAC CHARGES - OCT 2008 198924 110508 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 84,194.55 316015 11/1312008 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 311,064.51 SEWER SERVICE 198817 0000885299 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 311,064.51 316016 11/13/2008 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 161.49 LAMP ASSEMBLY 00005188 198644 461138FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 161.49 316017 11/13/2008 102068 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRA 1,325.27 ROOFTOP UNIT MOTOR 198818 205044136 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,325.27 316018 11/1312008 103008 MICKMAN BROTHERS 1,455.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005383 198709 IRRO29397 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 1,455.00 316019 11/13/2008 104650 MICRO CENTER 23.41 DIGITAL CAMERA 00004429 198819 1946523 1552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUII CITY OF EDINA 11/1;,,-v815:32:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.20 DVDS 00004431 198820 1959364 1265.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 43.61 316020 11113/2008 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 4,302.49 ASPHALT 00005748 198645 97222MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 4,302.49 316021 11/13/2008 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 633.35 198708 26430 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,663.16 198708 26430 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,296.51 316022 11/13/2008 105593 MIDWEST CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CE 15.97 VIDEO COPY 198925 08- 003300 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.97 316023 11113/2008 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 281.38 GASOLINE 00006463 199061 51622 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 199.20 GASOLINE 00006463 199062 51623 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 265.50 DIESEL 00005252 199063 51624 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 145.75 DIESEL 00005252 199064 51903 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 352.45 DIESEL 00005252 199065 51891 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 386.40 DIESEL 00005252 199066 51879 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 325.40 DIESEL 00005252 199067 51773 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 273.00 GASOLINE 00006463 199068 51771 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 637.56 DIESEL 00005252 199069 51772 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,866.64 316024 1111312008 119738 MIDWEST MINIMELTS 656.25 'ICE CREAM 198971 12194 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 656.25 316025 11/13/2008 102582 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 30.00 BOILER INSPECTIONS 198927 B42351R1485291 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 70.00 BOILER REGISTRATION 00001048 198928 B42351R1478301 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 10.00 PRESSURE VESSEL REGISTRATION 198929 B42351 R1478271 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 20.00 PRESSURE VESSEL REGISTRATION 198930 B42351111491491 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 150.00 LICENSES 198973 B42351R1476561 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 40.00 BOILER REGISTRATION 198974 B42351R1476571 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 40.00 COMPRESSOR REGISTRATION 199088 842351111484661 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 COMPRESSOR REGISTRATION 199089 B42351R1476551 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.00 BOILER PERMIT 199100 B42351R1478461 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/13/2008 -- 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 420.00 316026 11/13/2008 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,210.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005837 198972 33292 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,210.00 316027 11/13/2008 '101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 130.00 2009 MAAR LICENSE 198821 1512099 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 316028 11/13/2008 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 36,025.40 WATER PURCHASE 198926 110308 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 36,025.40 316029 11113/2008 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 19.81 CARBON DIOXIDE 00006428 199070 R110080130 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.81 316030 11/13/2008 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 18.00 HANDICAPS 198823 45- 150 -13- 10/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 252.00 HANDICAPS 198824 45- 150 -16- 10/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 27.00 HANDICAPS 198825 45- 150 -21- 10/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS - 18.00 HANDICAPS 198826 45- 150 -26 -10/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 18.00 HANDICAPS 198827 45- 150 -15- 10/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 333.00 316031 11113/2008 123564 MINNESOTA IRRIGATION SYSTEMS L 194.80 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005353 198710 3161 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 194.80 316032 11/13/2008 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 486.00 PRINTING NEWSPAPER INSERTS 198932 56647 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 486.00 PRINTING NEWSPAPER INSERTS 198932 56647 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 486.00 PRINTING NEWSPAPER INSERTS 198932 56647 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,458.00 316033 11/13/2008 101316 MMBA 115.00 TRAINING SEMINAR 198931 2008 -67 5840.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 215.00 TRAINING SEMINAR 198931 2008 -67 5860.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 330.00 316034 11 /1' 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 11/12/200815:32:16 Page - 18 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING DISTRIBUTION GRILL GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF L—AA Council Check Register 11/13/2008 — 11/1312008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 93.54 STORAGE 198975 151016847 7412.6153 STORAGE 93.54 316035 11/13/2008 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 175.32 BUSINESS CARDS . 00003502 198976 5319 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 175.32 316036 11/13/2008 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 43.87 LEVER 00005642 199101 460827F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 43.87 316037 11/13/2008 106073 MR. RAIN IRRIGATION INC. 525.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005465 198711 21490 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 525.00 316038 11/1312008 102776 MRPA 204.00 BASKETBALL REGISTRATION 198822 110108 4077.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 204.00 316039 11113/2008 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 76.86 STEERING MOUNT ASSEMBLY 00006350 199071 644282 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 76.86 316040 11113/2008 100173 NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION COON 445.00 POLICE OFFICER COLORING BOOKS 198933 766691 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 445.00 316041 1111312008 122164 NERO INC. 23.66 NERO BURNING SOFTWARE 00004427 198828 2008 -11292 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.66 316042 1111312008 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 45.00 BUSINESS CARDS 198978 1350 7410.6575 PRINTING 45.00 316043 11/13/2008 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 74.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198934 110508 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 74.50 316044 11/13/2008 123565 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE INC. 1,450.00, SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005360 198712 501260 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,375.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005361 198713 501261 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 11/1e__..05:32:16 Page- 19 Business Unit PSTF RANGE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PSTF ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PHASE I ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO R55CKREG LOG20000 55.00 CITY OF EDINA 316048 11/13/2008 Council Check Register 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 107.94 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 107.94 2,825.00 316049 316045 11/13/2008 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 198646 1916 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6530 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 198646 1916 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 198646 1916 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 198647 1966 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 198647 1966 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,210.75 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 198647 1966 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 510.00 198879 8203076 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 316046 11/1312008 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 199034 8203077 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 27.78 PHONE CARDS 00002066 198935 448965175 -001 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.5513 28.74 PAPER 00006034 198936 449163035 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 63.89 BATTERY BACKUP 00006034 198937 449339970 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00006034 198938 448866434 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES K9 GROOMING 138.98 T -6429 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 316047 11/1312008 102265 OLSON, TIM 11/12/200815:32:16 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ED ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 55.00 EMT COURSE EXPENSES 199072 100708 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 55.00 316048 11/13/2008 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 107.94 PEST CONTROL 198829 41625446 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 107.94 316049 11/13/2008 101718 PARTS PLUS 27.29 AUTO PARTS 198988 103108 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 27.29 316050 11/13/2008 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 677.00 198877 8200943 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,210.75 198878 8202637 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,864.52 198879 8203076 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 953.15 199034 8203077 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 167.25- 199035 8202542 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5,538.17 316051 11/13/2008 102406 PETSMART #458 59.86 K9 GROOMING 00003026 198939 T -6429 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.86 CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -.4A 11/1- .615:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 21 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 316052 11/13/2008 100950 PETTY CASH .07- PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1001.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2.66 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.00 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 5.75 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1553.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.00 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 6.00 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 6.00 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 8.53 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 8.78 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 10.00 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 19.50 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 20.29 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 28.69 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 34.93 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 36.10 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 37.40 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 38.46 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.97 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 59.83 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 60.00 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 62.40 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 117.54 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 137.83 PETTY CASH 198840 110608 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 761.59 316053 11/1312008 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 658.77 198880 2678646 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,110.61 198881 2678645 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,953.63 198882 2678643 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.12 198883 2678644 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 10.00- 198884 3394906 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,551.92 199036 2678636 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 897.70 199037 2678638 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 495.30 199038 2678637 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,062.62 199039 2678639 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,953.43 199040 2678641 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,113.43 199041 2678642 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,091.85 199042 2678640 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15,926.38 316054 11113/2008 123349 PIONEER MIDWEST INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/17/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 22 11/1312008 -- 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,081.87 SPRINKLER REPAIR 198714 11182 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 1,081.87 316055 11113/2008 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.36 PEST CONTROL 198979 1212678 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.36 316056 11113/2008 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 120.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 198715 110408 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 120.00 316057 11113/2008 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 536.50 TIRES 00005641 198648 303374 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 805.35. TIRES 00005942 198649 323937 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 1,067.29 TIRES 00005404 198650 339883 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,409.14 316058 11/13/2008 100819 POPP.COM 118.30 PHONE REPAIRS 00002072 198940 92897 5610.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION 118.30 316059 11/1312008 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 198830 110608 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 316060 11/13/2008 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 180.00 PERMIT PI 376 RENEWAL 198831 RENEWAL 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 180.00 316061 11/13/2008 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 1,600.00 EDINA ART CENTER MAILING 198941 110708 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,600.00 316062 11/13/2008 119429 POVOLNY SPECIALTIES 479.25 SOCCER LIGHT PARTS 00005271 198980 30785 47062.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SOCCER/FOOTBL LIGHTS 479.25 316063 11/13/2008 108681 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY 1,219.00 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 199090 21760 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 399.00 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 199091 21761 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 3,891.00 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 199092 21684 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5,509.00 CITY OF EuiNA 11/12/ku0815:32:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # , Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 316064 11113/2008 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 83.04 CHAIN FOR CHAINSAW 00002057 198942 129591 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 83.04 CHAIN 00002057 198943 129669 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 166.08 316065 11113/2008 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. 91.85 REPAIR SEAT CUSHION 00001052 198841 14715 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.85 316066 11/1312008 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE C 1,059.68 TREE REMOVAL 00005753 198651 8357 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 1,059.68 316067 1111312008 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,567.81 198771 081423 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,017.00 198772 080096 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 118.60 198773 081477 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,088.30 198774 080448 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 217.18 198775 081393 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 353.38 198776 081087 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.00- 198777 075955 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 199.00 198885 081434 -00 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,287.39 198886 081437 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,525.30 198887 081433 -00 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 741.52 198888 081086 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 280.26 198889 • 081394 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR' 50TH ST SELLING 1,107.80 198890 080449 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 288.00 198891 080574 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 384.01 198892 066272 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15,162.55 316068 11/1312008 123575 QUILL CORPORATION 128.83 EVIDENCE UTILITY CART 198944 6937 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 128.83 316069 11/1312008 101965 QWEST 55.41 198716 102808 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.10 198716 102808 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 83.41 198716 102808 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 97.02 198716 102808 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 102.38 198716 102808 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 24 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 115.36 198716 102808 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.90 198716 102808 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 164.57 198716 102808 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 233.16 198716 102808 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 264.75 198716 102808 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 292.19 198716 102808 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,084.69 198716 102808 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 285.80 612 E24 -8656 199102 8656 -11/08 1628.6188. TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 508.84 612 E24 -8657 199103 8657- 11/08 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 508.31 612 E01 -8392 199104 8392 -11/08 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 86.62 952 926 -0419 199105 0419 -11/08 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.18 651 281 -1355 8001311 199106 1355 -11/08 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51.78 952 926 -0092 199107 0092 -11/08 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 748.42 612 E01 -0426 199108 0426 -11/08 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,920.89 316070 11/13/2008 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 1,001.10 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00005973 198652 443 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,001.10 316071 11/13/2008 123572 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 4,749.90 SCREEN RENTAL 00005398 198842 R02495 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4,749.90 316072 11/1312008 114489 RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION 54.17 COPIER USAGE 198981 403840429 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 54.17 316073 11/13/2008 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 205.40 WINDOW TINTING 00005648 198653 52731 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 205.40 316074 11/13/2008 101902 RINK SYSTEMS INC 220.93 GOAL PAD, NETTING 00008043 198982 9809639 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 220.93 316075 11/13/2008 122484 ROGERS PAINTING & SERVICES INC 285.00 PREP & STAIN ARNESON GAZEBO 00005554 198832 752 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,880.00 PREP & STAIN ARNESON GAZEBO 00005554 198832 752 1646.6103 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,165.00 316076 11/1" 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EUINA 11/1;, -- 815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 25 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 220.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00005755 198654 26029 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 165.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00005756 198655 26158 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 170.00 TREE HEALTH CONSULTATION 198717 24788 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 555.00 316077 11113/2008 121678 SAABYE, PETER 20.00 BOILER OPERATOR LICENSE 199073 111008 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 20.00 316078 11113/2008 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 108.09 PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT 00001044 198718 MB02477786 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 108.09 316079 11/1312008 122471 SEED SOLUTIONS 1,682.70 FERTILIZER 00005748 198656 5707172 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 1,682.70 FERTILIZER 00005577 198657 5704867 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 3,365.40 316080 1111312008 101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL 239.77 UNIFORM PURCHASE 198945 110608 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 239.77 316081 11113/2008 119910 SKRABA IRRIGATION ` 506.01 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005381 198719 DREXEL AVE 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 954.37 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005382 198720 DREXEL AV 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 1,460.38 316082 11/13/2008 110977 SOW, ADAMA 104.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 198788 110408 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 104.00 316083 11/13/2008 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 140.00 GAS, PROPANE 0419133038 00005965 198658 102308 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 226.34 GAS, PROPANE 0419133038 00005965 198658 102308 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 366.34 316084 11113/2008 103082 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS INC. 1,053.34 SPRINKLER REPAIR BRUCE AV198721 11387 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN., BRUCE, CASCO 221.40 SPRINKLER REPAIR BRUCE AV198722 11385 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 146.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR BRUCE AV198723 11388 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 106.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR BRUCE AV198724 11386 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 1,527.74 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/13/2008 -- 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 316085 11/13/2008 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 4038.43 WANT ADS 198843 103108 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 11/12/200815:32:16 Page - 26 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,038.43 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 316086 11/13/2008 GRILL 101015 STREICHERS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,231.16 TRAINING AMMO 198946 1563983 2008 -25803 5862.6122 2,231.16 316087 11/13/2008 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 299.94 LIFT STATION PROJECT 198726 20.48 CHANNEL 00005649 198659 136550CVW 33.98 FILTER, OIL 00001051 198844 CTCS544818 54.46 316088 11113/2008 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 446.00 198778 JM6117 446.00 316089 1111312008 120595 T- MOBILE 51.64 SURVEY PHONE 477067848 198725 102608 51.64 316090 11/13/2008 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 357.80 CONNECTORS, SIGNAL MOUNTINGS0005643 198660 29711 -00 357.80 316091 11/1312008 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 4,516.65 198779 515882 106.25 198780 515883 180.00- 198781 69587 2,029.05 199043 516782 115.00 199074 69662 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 11/12/200815:32:16 Page - 26 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 198947 316092 11/13/2008 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 198947 2008 -25803 5822.6122 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 198947 2008 -25803 5842.6122 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 198947 2008 -25803 5862.6122 525.00 316093 11/13/2008 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 299.94 LIFT STATION PROJECT 198726 000200804003 10037.1705.20 ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER CONSULTING DESIGN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING LS37 LS REHAB @' IT DRIVE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -_...A 11/1-.d15:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 27 11/13/2008 - 11113/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 299.95 LIFT STATION PROJECT 198726 000200804003 10038.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE 12,912.37 WM LINING MORNINGSIDE 198948 000200804010 05479.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-479 M'SIDE H20MAIN EXC /PREP 13,512.26 316094 11/13/2008 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 198983 23358 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 198983 23358 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 198983 23358 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 42.60 316095 11/13/2008 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 24.30 BACKGROUND CHECKS 198949 10828109 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 24.30 316096 11/13/2008 101042 TRIARCO 19.00 ART SUPPLIES 00009425 198833 675016 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 73.86 ART SUPPLIES 00009425 198833 675016 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 92.86 316097 11/13/2008 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 287.60 HOIST MOUNT WELDMENT 00005907 198728 44090 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 287.60 316098 11/13/2008 100682 TRUGREEN LAWNCARE 69.49 FERTILIZE/WEED CONTROL 00005760 198727 656639 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 69.49 316099 11173/2008 123582 TSCHOSICK, RON 99.82 HARDBOARD, STAKES 199075 110708 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 99.82 316100 11/13/2008 123566 TWIN TOWN IRRIGATION INC. 385.92 SPRINKLER REPAIR 198729 80545 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA-342 HIGHLANDS AREA 385.92 316101 11/13/2008 123567 ULTRA IRRIGATION 90.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005451 198730 5451 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 120.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005388 198731 5388 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 210.00 316102 11/13/2008 120675 ULTRAMAX 2,220.00 S &W AMMO 199076 101136 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 28 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,220.00 316103 11113/2008 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 57.89 UNIFORMS 199077 103108 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 229.50 UNIFORMS 199077 103108 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,519.35 UNIFORMS 199077 103108 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,806.74 316104 11/13/2008 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 324.00 MPWA CONFERENCE / WORKSHOP 198984 110706 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 225.00 MPWA CONFERENCE 199115 111008 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 549.00 316105 11113/2008 118284 UPPER MISSISSIPPI IRRIGATION 357.80 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005466 198732 102408BILL 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 357.80 316106 11!13/2006 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 461.76 CUST 114300 199078 103108 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,670.73 CUST 114300 199078 103108 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,132.49 316107 11/13/2008 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 66.03 OXYGEN 00003649 199093 882505 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66.03 316108 11/13/2008 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 242.21 TISSUE, ROLL TOWEL 00005745 198661 100350 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 242.21 316109 11/1312008 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 116.33 SRPINGS, SHOCK ABSORBER 00006351 199079 40300 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 116.33 316110 11113/2008 101064 VESSCO INC. 329.09 GASKETS 00005946 198845 43852 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 329.09 316111 11/13/2008 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 42.82 LIGHTING 00005811 198662 15113548 -02 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 260.71 LIGHTING 00005970 198733 15113343 -00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 982.13 LIGHTING 00005970 198733 15113343 -00 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF - .A 11/1- _615:32:16 Council Check Register Page - 29 11/13/2008 - 11/13/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,285.66 316112 11113/2008 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 46.74- CREDIT 00005731 199109 CM1463098CHW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.17- CREDIT 00005640 199110 CM1384788CHW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.43 PLUG CORES 00001758 199111 1500198CHW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.53 EXTENDERS 00005194 199112 1522868CJW 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.63 TOUCH UP PAINT 00001002 199113 1523738CHW 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.68 316113 11/13/2008 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 1,757.25 GAS PUMP PARTS 00005186 198663 0038212 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 68.49 KEY RECEPTICAL 00005405 198985 0038294 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING. 1,825.74 316114 11/13/2008 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 613.70 198782 205100 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,669.60 198783 204815 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,991.80 198784 204850 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 702.30 198893 205105-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,859.00 198894 204816 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 236.00 198895 205103 -00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 610.45 198896 205104 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 23,682.85 316115 11113/2008 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 339.36 198897 251415 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 543.10 198898 251413 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 152.00 .198899 250653 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 709.34 199044 251411 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 420.60 199045 251412 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,345.73 199046 251414 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,510.13 316116 11/1312008 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 243.81 BRACKET ASSEMBLY 00001151 198846 550581 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.06 BELT 00005750 198847 552881 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125.50 OIL COOLER .00006340 199080 552160 -001 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 182.96 OIL COOLER, GAS SPRINGS 00006325 199081 551019 -000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 374.90 TINES 00006340 199082 552160 -000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,368.13 GA60 PARTS 00006343 199083 552409 -000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,365.36 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/12/200815:32:16 Council Check Register Page- 30 11/13/2008 - 11113/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 316117 11113/2008 118395 WITMER ASSOCIATES INC. 628.29 HOODS 00003748 198986 E501485 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 628.29 316118 11/13/2008 123404 WIZA, LAUREN 44.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 199084 111008 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 44.75 316119 11/13/2008 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 750.60 198900 219567 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,383.35 198901 219564 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 237.95 198902 219600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,121.55 198903 219565 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,493.45 316120 11/13/2008 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,386.00 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 198734 3 -01686 -130 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 141.98 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT 198735 6 -01686 -110 01348.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -348 PARKLAWN - FRANCE TO YORK 173.52 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT 198735 6- 01686 -110 01349.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -349 76TH ST- FRANCE TO YORK 68.00 70TH ST FINAL DESIGN 198736 20- 01686 -050 1265.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 4,858.50 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 198737 16- 01686 -030 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,331.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 198738 15- 01686 -020 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 8,959.00 316121 11/13/2008 101726 XCEL ENERGY 16.24 51- 4151897 -6 198664 173181234 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.58 51- 7567037 -0 198665 173240312 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 3,943.41 51- 6621207 -1 198666 173223884 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION, 997.27 51- 69799484 198667 173230540L 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,170.47 51- 69799484 198667 173230540 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,342.73 51- 69799484 198667 173230540 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 125.12 51- 6229265 -9 198668 173059600 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,137.94 51- 6229265 -9 198668 173059600 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 568.08 51- 6046826 -0 198669 173055926 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 345.11. 51- 5938955 -6 198670 173055233 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 20,276.14 51 4888627 -1 198671 173342066 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 421.50 51- 6137136 78 198672 173366574 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4,904.61 51- 4966303 -6 198673 173274019 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 81.18 51- 5634814 -2 198674 173048542 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 130.59 514156445 -0 198675 173027316 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,826.79 51- 6121102 -5 198987 173707137 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTEt R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 5,057.20 51- 6824328 -7 44,374.96 316122 11/1312008 120099 Z WINES USA LLC CITY G, AA Council Check Register 11/13/2008 -- 11/13/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 199114 173908554 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 297.50 VERNON SELLING 198904 1977 5862.5513 828.00 199047 1987 5842.5513 1,125.50 316123 11/1312008 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 450.28 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00002071 198950 54164555 5610.6610 450.28 316124 11/1312006 101091 ZIEGLER INC 2,422.88 COMPRESSOR RENTAL 00006221 199085 E6170301 5422.6180 2,422.88 943,629.12 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 943,629.12 Total Payments 943,629.12 11, ,815:32:16 Page- 31 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 226,456.83 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,083.42 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 33,975.37 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,672.77 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 26.60 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 627.50 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 19,341.91 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 21,687.62 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 2,912.99 05800 LIQUOR FUND 258,432.53 05900 UTILITY FUND 370,961.73 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 488.18 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,961.67 Report Totals 943,629.12 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 11/13/2008 - 11/1312008 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll lesqrtd procedures date... 1 3 0 F 11/12/200815:36:28 Page - 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMI REGISTER 9/26/08- 10/27/08 Card Holder Jlerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/09/26 $251.34 CONFERENCE CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOL BRAINERD MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/09/26 $251.34 CONFERENCE CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOL BRAINERD MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/09/29 .($44.50) RETURN AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/09/29 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/09/29 $48.33 STORAGE BOXES TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/02 $101.20 COSTUME LPSTORE 402- 935 -7733 FL JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/03 $196.70 PENS PENSRUS 800 - 6822289 NY JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/06 $69.34 COSTUME DIS *DISNEYSHOPPING.CON 800 - 328 -0368 CA JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/08 $29.36 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES RENTAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/10 $132.52 SHOVELS MILLS FLEET FARM #25 LAKEVILLE MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/13 $144.91 HEAT GUN NOR*NORTHERN TOOL 800 - 222 -5381 MN JOHN KEPRIOS. 2008/10/16 $177.44 PARK PROGRAM SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/21 $528.18 NOVELTY SUPPLIES RHODE ISLAND NOVELTY 800 - 528 -5599 RI JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/23 $188.32 EDINBOROUGH SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/10/24 $384.00 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM THE CHILDRENS THEATRE 612- 874 -0400 MN DEB MANGEN 2008/10/09 $359.85 DELUX STANCHION EQUICROSS INC. 813 - 982 -1920 FL MIKE SIITARI 2008/10/01 $42.75 HEATER TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN MIKE SIITARI 2008/10/07 $96.18 USB DRIVES BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN MIKE SIITARI 2008/10/13 $89.35 FILE CABINET OFFICE MAX EDINA MN MIKE SIITARI 2008/10/15 $93.92 POLICE SUPPLIES WIDENERS RELOADING SS 800 - 6153006 TN MIKE SIITARI 2008/10/23 $64.30 TRAINING SUPPLIES GANDER MOUNTA100104892 EDEN PRAIRIE MN MIKE SIITARI 2008/10/23 $57.38 TRAINING SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN MIKE SIITARI 2008/10/24 $621.78 ERT TRAINING HONKIN' JOE'S CAFE EDINA MN JOHN WALLIN 2008/09/30 $249.00 TRAINING MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF C1952- 831 -2707 MN JOHN WALLIN 2008/10/03 $178.50 CONFERENCE HOLIDAY INNS DULUTH MN JOHN WALLIN 2008/10/07 $182.83 COMP PLAN MEAL PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN JOHN WALLIN 2008/10/17 $35.00 MEMBERSHIP SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN JOHN WALLIN 2008/10/22 $182.83 WORKSHOP MEAL PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN JOHN WALLIN 2008/10/26 $1,236.78 PARTS FOR SERVER HP SERVICES 800 - 325 -5372 CA $6,048.93 We confi m to the best of ow kwAftg and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and 1600.6104 1600.6104 5410.6406 5610.6235 1624.6406 5610.6406 5610.6513 5610.6406 5610.6235 5210.6406 5210.6530 1600.4390.50 5620.6406 5610.6406 1629.6406 1180.6406 1400.6406 1400.6160 1400.6406 1400.6710 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 5910.6104 1140.6104 1140.6106 1140.6105 1100.6106 1554.6710 To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: Correspondence and Petitions Received Since Last Council Meeting Info /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Attached are copies of e- mails, letters and petitions received since the last Council meeting. From: Joanne Bolduc [mailto:jgbolduc @msn.com] RECEIVED Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 6:48 AM Nov 1 2008 To: Lynette Biunno Cc: mbrindle @comcast.net Subject: Fw: 70th Street support of Ferrell 11 -8 -08 letter Please distribute to the City Council and SAC Chairman Brown. Ellin Ainsworth at (4700 West 70th) and Al & Joanne Bolduc at (7001 West Shore Drive) have all reviewed the following letter already sent to Mayor Hovland and Chairman Brown. We wish to offer our support of these concepts. The Ferrell's have presents a coherent narrative of 70th and have come up with a very detailed plan which would meet the stated goals of the study, provide minimal disruption, preserve the residential character of the street, cost less and give us an opportunity to address only 70th and not the entire SE Edina Traffic situation. I do wish to emphasis that.if you take the right of way at West Shore, Wooddale and Cornelia you are taking down a huge mature oak, a huge blue spruce on the SW corner of 70th. You will kill all the arborvitae that provide a residential barrier to the street on the SE corner because you will compromise the root system and they will die because of the all salt policy which has already killed and severely stressed many trees on 70th. On Cornelia there is a huge oak at the school corner and mature trees on two of the other corners. Wooddale presents the same concerns. Don't destroy what has taken 40 years to develop for I" diameter boulevard planting. Thank you. To: Mayor Hovland and Chairman Brown, Thank you for your participation at the SAC meeting. The neighborhood outcry on 70th Street was started by a flyer proclaiming "4 -LANE HWY" is to be built through my neighborhood. The first concern of residents was more traffic at faster speeds but the real fear was the use of right of way to build it. We feared the loss of the green space that is our front yards, loss of the canopy of trees in the boulevards and the right of way and loss of on- street parking. These changes would have removed the residential character at the heart of the Cornelia Neighborhood. We felt our property would be devalued. The 4 -LANE option was Out out to pasture very quickly. Our problems on 70th started when one group of residents from the greater neighborhood proclaimed their solution was the only solution. They wanted to shut down studies, viable discussion of solutions and any one who tried to speak out with alternative ideas. The moral character of the neighborhood has been torn apart. We MUST have a discussion and find solution to preserve our neighborhood. Start with what we can agree upon and our road will present it self as a reflection of our common goals. ** Preserve the existing FOOT PRINT of 70th Street; do not go into right -of -way. ( saves green space, tree canopy and home setbacks from'roadway) ** Preserve the residential ON- STREET PARKING ( natural traffic calming plus allows experienced bikers to use roadway) ** Signage to notify drivers that they are entering the" Cornelia Neighborhood" (reduce volume) not signs to redirect to other streets. ** Lower SPEEDS at the school during arrival and departure times. ( reduce speed, increase safety) ** OVERLAY roadway ( quiet traffic ) ** Start work with MNDOT to close the FREE RIGHT TURN at NB HWY 100 with the goal of smart signals at HWY 100 and Cornelia Dr. to obtain needed gaps for access in the corridor. safer access) ** Extend the TIMING of the existing traffic signal at Cornelia. ( both pedestrian safety and to provide wider gaps for side street access along the corridor) ** Install a pedestrian activated CROSSING ARM at West Shore Dr. and Wooddale Ave. (as on 5151 and Halifax) (safety for transit user in the dark in early A.M. and winter P.M.) ** Encourage the 23 residents with driveways on 70th street to install a TURN- A- ROUND on their property to access 70th by safely pulling forward into traffic. ** LANDSCAPE improvements that can survive the new all salt no sand deicer that is damaging lawns and killing trees. The fly in the ointment is bike paths. It sounds good to add bike paths but not at the expense of the residential on- street parking and yard intrusion. Many of us on 70th would not have access to side street parking. Parking on one side is not the solution. Do we jaywalk to park and expect guests to jaywalk? The existing 40' roadbed is wide enough for cars with left turns but not wide enough to enhance it with bike paths and other transport vehicles. The designated bike paths that connect with other communities are designated by Hennepin County, which is choosing 66tH Street to traverse Edina. If we installed a bike path on 70th Street it would not connect on the east or west end to an existing bike path. France Ave to York on 70th Street is now complete with no bike path. The west of HWY 100 design is only adding a sidewalk on the south side. We would have a disjointed stretch of bike path. The safest place for children and recreational bikers that choose to ride 70th Street are the state aid sidewalks we presently have on both sides of the street.. Presently, experienced bikers use the existing parking lanes. I believe that a traffic signal at West Shore Dr. is unnecessary and will cause excess queuing on the corridor resulting in acceleration noise and a concentration of exhaust fumes for nearby neighbors. The count of north /south traffic and turning counts do not meet warrant. If a warrant is not met, MNDOT would not pay for it. Funding: where's the money? No one wants to pay for it even with state aid (80/20) but absolutely not at 100% to assessed homeowners. $1,000,000 is a lot of money even when it is divided by about 65 properties. The current roadway meets MNDOT requirements and the above stated enhancements also meet MNDOT standards which would protect the 80/20 assessed to homeowners, thus enhancing 70th Street. The Larger Problem: we can not solve 70th Street volumes when our whole system is over loaded. The city, county, state and federal systems have to be addressed to offer feasible alternatives. The 2007 SRF Origin- destination survey of eastbound P.M. Peak Hour traffic shows us that 27% of the east bound cars on 70th Street have Richfield as their destination. We need to show these 3500 cars an alternative way home that is not clogged with bumper -to- bumper traffic. The goal of this study has expanded past its purview and the capabilities to study the larger issues on a limited budget. We need MNDOT to participate in discussions during future studies. Please bring the study to a conclusion for the middle portion of 70th Street and consider the above stated enhancement at this time. Study the Hwy 100 and Valley View approaches when additional funds are available to conduct a more comprehensive study in the southeast Edina area. Thank you for your consideration, Jan & John Ferrell 4704 West 70th Street Whether you have lived in Edina your whole life or just joined the community we all want to do the right thing for our future. RECEIVED NOV 0 71008 To: Mayor Hovland and Chairman Brown, Council members, SAC members Thank you for your participation at the SAC meeting. The neighborhood outcry on 70th Street was started by a flyer proclaiming '*LANE HWY" is to be built through my neighborhood. The first concern of residents was more traffic at faster speeds but the real fear was the use of right of way to build it. We feared the loss of the green space that is our front yards, loss of the canopy of trees in the boulevards and the right of way and loss of on- street parking. These changes would have removed the residential character at the heart of the Cornelia Neighborhood. We felt our property would be devalued. The 4 -LANE option was put out to pasture very quickly. Our problems on 70h started when one group of residents from the greater neighborhood proclaimed their solution was the only solution. They wanted to shut down studies, viable discussion of solutions and any one who tried to speak out with alternative ideas. The moral character of the neighborhood has been torn apart. We MUST have a discussion and find solution to preserve our neighborhood. Start with what we can agree upon and our road will present it self as a reflection of our common goals. ** Preserve the existing FOOT PRINT of 70th Street; do not go into right -of -way. ( saves green space, tree canopy and home setbacks from roadway) ** Preserve the residential ON- STREET PARKING ( natural traffic calming plus allows experienced bikers to use roadway) ** Signage to notify drivers that they are entering the" Cornelia Neighborhood" (reduce volume) not signs to redirect to other streets. ** Lower SPEEDS at the school during arrival and departure times. ( reduce speed, increase safety) ** OVERLAY roadway ( quiet traffic) ** Start work with MNDOT to close the FREE RIGHT TURN at NB HWY 100 with the goal of smart signals at HWY 100 and Cornelia Dr. to obtain needed gaps for access in the corridor. safer access) ** Extend the TIMING of the existing traffic signal at Cornelia. ( both pedestrian safety and to provide wider gaps for side street access along the corridor) ** Install a pedestrian activated CROSSI.NG ARM at West Shore Dr. and Wooddale Ave. (as on 51'` and Halifax) (safety for transit user in the dark in early A.M. and winter P.M.) ** Encourage the 23 residents with driveways on 70th street to install a TURN- A- ROUND on their property to access 70th by safely pulling forward into traffic. ** LANDSCAPE improvements that can survive the new all salt no sand deicer that is damaging lawns and killing trees. The fly in the ointment is bike paths. It sounds good to add bike paths but not at the expense of the residential on- street parking and yard intrusion. Many of us on 70th would not have access to side street parking. Parking on one side is not the solution. Do we jaywalk to park and expect guests to jaywalk? The existing 40' roadbed is wide enough for cars with left turns but not wide enough to enhance it with bike paths and other transport vehicles. The designated bike paths that connect with other communities are designated by Hennepin County, which is choosing 66tH Street to traverse Edina. If we installed a bike path on 70th Street it would not connect on the east or west end to an existing bike path. France Ave to York on 70th Street is now complete with no bike path. The west of HWY 100 design is only adding a sidewalk on the south side. We would have a disjointed stretch of bike path. The safest place for children and recreational bikers that choose to ride 70th Street are the state aid sidewalks we presently have on both sides of the street. Presently, experienced bikers use the existing parking lanes. believe that a traffic signal at West Shore Dr. is unnecessary and will cause excess queuing on the corridor resulting in acceleration noise and a concentration of exhaust fumes for nearby neighbors. The count of north /south traffic and turning counts do not meet warrant. If a warrant is not met, MNDOT would not pay for it. Funding: where's the money? No one wants to pay for it even with state aid (80/20) but absolutely not at 100% to assessed homeowners. $1,000,000 is a lot of money even when it is divided by about 65 properties. The current roadway meets MNDOT requirements and the above stated enhancements also meet MNDOT standards which would protect the 80/20 assessed to homeowners, thus enhancing 70th Street. The Larger Problem: we can not solve 70th Street volumes when our whole system is over loaded. The city, county, state and federal systems have to be addressed to offer feasible alternatives. The 2007 SRF Origin- destination survey of eastbound P.M. Peak Hour traffic shows us that 27% of the east bound cars on 70th Street have Richfield as their destination. We need to show these 3500 cars an alternative way home that is not clogged with bumper -to- bumper traffic. The goal of this study has expanded past its purview and the capabilities to study the larger issues on a limited budget. We need MNDOT to participate in discussions during future studies. Please bring the study to a conclusion for the middle portion of 70th Street and consider the above stated enhancement at this time. Study the Hwy 100 and Valley View approaches when additional funds are available to conduct a more comprehensive study in the southeast Edina area. Thank you for your consideration, Jan & John Ferrell 4704 West 70th Street Whether you have lived in Edina your whole life or just joined the community we all want to do the right thing for our future. RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2008 A great deal of time and money has gone into the 70`h Street study resulting in three potential alternatives - none of which meet the criteria set forth by the SAC. Not one of the proposals realistically addresses traffic volume, speed or safety. Expensive ideas with unsubstantiated projections have been proposed. But none with concrete solutions. These three alternatives are based on a survey which was poorly constructed, not subject to any controls, used a suspect analysis of figures and completely kept critical comments by 70th St. residents out of the hands of the city council, SAC members and the ETC. Such comments are at the heart of trying to determine what is best for 70th St. Because of the survey flaws and the drawbacks of all three options (especially the option that SAC seems to be leaning towards), I urge that a far less expensive, less invasive, and less speculative approach be taken. The survey was flawed for many reasons and I suggest you read John and Jan Ferrell's more detailed analysis of the survey and its results. My husband and I were greatly concerned about the survey because: • It included more than 1400 people — a far cry from the residents and neighborhood immediately affected by any changes. • The 70th Street residents were separated from the entire group, but our comments were disregarded and not tabulated. The questions were framed in such a way that if one said speed, volume or safety were of a concern, it appeared that the respondent automatically thought 70th should be reconfigured. I believe these are areas that need to be looked at AND I wrote on each question that it was of importance but not to the extent of reconfiguration. Because comments were not tabulated, my responses were taken as an indication that I wanted a reconfiguration. Exactly the opposite of my position! • The survey was extraordinarily confusing. Were we being asked to rate each option on a 1 -5 basis? Or were we being asked to rank each option in order of preference? It's hard to rank an option as a 'T' when there are 4 options on the table. The information presented was sketchy at best. The maps were barely readable — we couldn't tell that according to the plan, 4 ft by 100 ft would be taken from our property. In fact, were it not for the persistence of my neighbor, Harold Babb, we still wouldn't know. The cost of the project and how it would be paid for were equally unclear. Vague ideas about precedent setting taxations were presented. In effect we were being asked to decide something based on inadequate information, with no clue as to how it would be paid for, beyond wishful thinking. The proposals - especially the one the SAC seems to be advocating - are not a good option for several. reasons: • Adding a traffic signal does not address the various traffic problems on 70`h street and creates others: it will cause an increase in auto pollution in the immediate area, will create a much bigger back -up on 70th street, and will not speed up the perceived delay of entering the intersection It takes property at West Shore and eliminates parking for a number of residents. • It would not be effective and is flawed in its rationale. The stop. signal in any proposal does not meet any of the MNDOT warrants and would require a waiver. Funding is iffy in that nobody seems to know who would pay for it if MNDOT does not. It has even been suggested by one city official that it might fall on the three property owners at 70th and West Shore( one corner is undeveloped). For three people to pay for a $200,000 signal that is wanted by those outside the immediate area is outrageous. • The stop light would not add to the residential character of the street. and would create visual blight. We already have a left turn lane, which is great for safety. We also have perfectly good sidewalks that would be torn up and redone with these proposals. Land would be taken for no gain. I realize this is supposed to be a solution for the entire area, but I will be assessed for it, will have my property taken, and will not see any benefit to my property. In addition to all of this, the neighborhood immediately south of 70th on West Shore is due for the entire street renovation in 2009. This project then may well negatively affect that project. Let's take a deep breath, put in noise reducing asphalt on 701h, close the "free" right hand turn off highway 100, and upgrade( for safety and aesthetics) the pedestrian crossings at Wooddale and West Shore. Then we might possibly adjust the timing of the light at 70th and Cornelia to address traffic flow. Low cost, low tech, low key. Let's do that before we throw ourselves into a project that we really might have to undo shortly. We can always do more later. Thank you for your attention. Joanne and Al Bolduc, 7001 West Shore Drive Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED NOV 131008 Mike Siitari To: Personnel Files Subject: FW: 08002171 From: Kory Hamel [mailto:Kory. Hamel @AmericanMedicalSystems.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:47 PM To: Tom McKenzie; Brandon Kuske Subject: Thank you . Detective McKenzie and Officer Kuske, I just wanted to once again pass along my thanks in the recovery of my bicycle. For me, it's better to be reminded that there are people like you working to help make the world better place than getting the bicycle back. Please pass along my thanks to all those involved. Your efforts are always greatly appreciated. Regards, Kory Hamel 10/29/2008 October 28, 2008 Chief Michael Siitari Edina Police Department. 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Chief Siitari: RECEIVED NOV 13110 This letter is to express my thanks and appreciation d your officers Ocupants of a responding to a call for assistance on the morning o f October home in New Hope had been firing numerous shots during the early morning hours. A request was made of the Edina Police Department to assist with the Bearcat vehicle. The use o equipment Edina Police staff quickly responded with the Bearcat. three offenders. contributed to the peaceful resolution and the apprehension of ree I do not have the names of the assisting officers so I'm asking you to please extend my thanks and appreciation to them for their assistance that morning. Sincerely, 6� 7�-X Gary B. Link Director of Police New Hope Police Department jrw CITY OF NEW HOPE 4401 Xylon Avenue North o New Hope, Minnesota 55428 -4898 • www. ci.new- hope.mn.us City Hall: 763- 531 -5100 a Police (non- emergency): 763- 531 -5170 • Public Works: 763- 592 -6777 • TDD: 763- 531 -5109 City Hall Fax: 763-531-5136 • Police Fax: 763- 531 -5174 • Public Works Fax: 763- 592 -6776 I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION BLOOMINGTON ° EDEN PRAIRIE s EDINA * MINNETONKA r PLYMOUTH " RICEFIELD 494 Commuter Services 5701 Normandale Road, Suite 322 Edina, MN 55424 Telephone: 952- 848 -4947 Fax: 952- 848 -4904 RECEIVED NOV 14 1008 November 4, 2008 Chairman Peter Bell Metropolitan Council 390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: Draft 2030 Transportation Policy Plan Dear Chairman Bell: We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the draft 2030 Transportation Policy Plan. The I- 494 Corridor Commission consists of the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Richfield representing over 350,000 residents and over 300,000 jobs in our member cities. Our primary effort is to act as a TMO in our member cities by reaching out to our employers and their employees to promote ride sharing, public transit and bicycling as an alternative to single- occupant vehicular commuting. We acknowledge TMO's as a very useful tool for managing congestion, but also advocate for needed highway and transit alternatives for our member cities. We offer the following comments on your draft 2030 Transportation Policy Plan: Chapter 2 — Policies and Strategies Policies In general, we are in agreement with the transportation investment policies found in Chapter 2 with exception to the language in policy 5 where the Metropolitan Council appears to be playing a minor role in interregional connections. We believe regional economic competition is extremely important, and the Council should consider a leadership coordination role among other agencies. Strategies We are surprised bottleneck identification and mitigation is not listed as a strategy under the Highway systems policies 9 or 11. The public identifies with highway bottlenecks, and has a positive response to any improvements. We believe there needs to be a more action - oriented strategy for bottleneck removal. For example, a strategy could be to identify the 10 worst highway bottlenecks in the region. The public would then have a benchmark upon which to judge progress on bottleneck mitigation. Chapter 5 — Regional Mobility We support the use of person through -put as a measure of highway system performance. It is a measure that can better reflect success in our effort to encourage ride - sharing, car pooling and I 494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION BLOOMINGTON " EDEN PRAIRIE ¢ EDINA - M 4NETONKA - PLYMOUTH RICHFIELD 494 Commuter Services 5701 Norniandale Road, Suite 322 Edina, MN 55424 Telephone: 952- 848 -4947 Fax: 952- 848 -4904 transit. However, Nye also believe it must include a travel -time component if the measurement is to reflect regional mobility. We support the plan's strategy to utilize TDM and TMO's to increase the use of alternative transportation modes. We look forward to partnering with the Metropolitan Council as it drafts the Congestion Management Plan in 2009 to describe the issues. challenges and effects TDM can have on congestion and relief during peak periods, along with the scope of activities and evaluation measures to undertake in order to achieve TDM's goals. Furthermore, we suggest the results of TMO activities such as TDM plan implementation, evaluation and success should be annually entered into a regional data bank for communities to reference and draw upon best practice strategies. We also suggest the Metropolitan Council partner with TMO's to offer and promote model TDM ordinances /requirements for communities to follow. The implementation of these ordinances will result in effective strategies to reduce peak period trips. We believe a strategy omission in this chapter is the failure to mention public /private partnerships. Numerous examples exist of regional transportation improvements resulting from local and private funding. Public collaboration with the private sector should be encouraged and supported, providing that the outcomes are consistent with Metropolitan Council land use and transportation policies. Chapter 6 giighways The first part of this chapter does a good job identifying significant improvement projects completed or under construction since the last transportation policy plan. It is an impressive list. However, there is no graph indicating if the region is better or worse than five years ago. We have heard anecdotal statements by motorists that their daily commute time was reduced by 20 -30 minutes ,as a result of some of the listed improvements. Instinctively, we would say we are better of� at least in some corridors, but there are no charts to illustrate this improvement. The policy strategies on system optimization (SOS) and re- examination of major highway projects are so intertwined it is difficult to understand how a specific project fits within the plan. Needless to say, the I-494 Corridor Commission is shocked at the removal of the I- 494/169 interchange reconstruction project from the 2030 TPP. This interchange was included in the Governor Pawlenty/Lt. Governor Molnau bond accelerated project proposal in 2003. At that time, $125.3 million was allocated for three interchanges: Pioneer Trail/169, Bloomington Fern- Road/Anderson Lakes Parkway /169, and 169 /494. The first two of the listed interchanges were built in 2005 and 2006. The remaining $80 million was inadequate to fund the 169/494 interchange that could have been approved by FHWA. Since the Crosstown -I -35W project needed approximately $50 million to start construction, the Met Council approved a $50 million loan from the,remaining funds for 169/494, with the prerequisite that the 169 /494 Interchange project be placed back in MnDOT's TIP for the Metro Area, as stated by Khani Sahebiam's December 19, 2007 letter to Don Wiski, TAB Chair. It is our understanding the remaining funds 7 I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION BLOOMINGTON * EDEN PRAIRIE * EDINA * NIINNETONKA * PLYMOUTH * RICHFIELD 494 Commuter Services 5701 Normandale Road, Suite 322 . Edina, MN 55424 Telephone: 952- 848 -4947 Fax: 952- 848 -4904 went towards projects that were underestimated in the list of bond accelerated projects by MnDOT. The project has not been reprogrammed. This interchange is a critical bottleneck in our region's transportation system and construction must not be left until after 2030. Now the plan, except for a brief reference on page 74, disregards previous commitments. This leaves one to believe that the interchange is relegated to many more unproductive years of planning, or will not be built within the 2030 time frame. Either of those alternatives is unacceptable. To be speck, on page 85, the draft plan says corridors "must be looked at holistically rather than in segments." We don't need years of holistic studies on I-494 and Harr 169 to determine that traffic signals at this high traffic -count intersection create a huge bottleneck and the only solution is a grade separated interchange. On page 87, the plan proposes a $30 million cap on re- scoped highway projects. Those exceeding the $30 million threshold would not be included in the 2010 TPP amendment. We find this an unacceptable threshold if regional needs are going to be addressed. The cities of Bloomington, Edina and Eden Prairie have been meeting with MnDOT to rework the design and scope of the I- 494 /169 interchange. Our officials believe the re- scoped project could now be completed for $70 million, a significant reduction from MnDOT s original estimate of $130 million. However, the $30 million arbitrary threshold would seem to exclude this worthy project from the TPP, despite the good re- scoping efforts by the engineers at MnDOT and our cities. We specifically request a re- examination of the dollar amount threshold. In reality, a dollar threshold makes little sense. It says a project in a low volume corridor can effectively compete with a project in a high volume corridor. If the Metropolitan Council feels compelled to have a project cost threshold. we then recommend it be on a per - person through- put/travel time saved criteria, not on an arbitrary construction cost. Furthermore we are disappointed the expansion project to add a third lane on I-494 between TH 55 and 1 -94 has been placed on hold until a 2010 policy plan amendment. We request the opportunity to participate in discussions with regard to the list of expansion projects in table 6 -32 as we want to ensure there is local involvement. We have two other big - picture observations in this chapter: 1) Tier I and Tier II bridges appear to be exempt from any re- scopmg process. That may be appropriate for the Hastings, Lafayette or Cayuga bridges, which are structurally deficient. However, the TH 36 Stillwater bridge is at a new location and estimated to cost $350 -400 million. If highway improvements are required to re- scope, why shouldn't a bridge design? If constructing a t-,vo -lane bridge with provision to add additional lanes at a future time would save $150 million, why shouldn't it be considered? I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION BLOOMINGTON * EDEN PRAIRIE * EDINA * NIINNETONKA * PLYMOUTH, * RICHFIELD 494 Commuter Services 5701 Norniandale Road, Suite 322 Edina, MN 55424 Telephone: 952- 848 -4947 Fax: 952- 8484904 2) It seems there is so much focus on system optimization through low -cost highway improvements that the region could be at risk of not being able to maximize a new infusion of federal highway dollars. Looking for low budget, cost effective improvements is worthy, but we all need to acknowledge that some projects will be expensive. MnDOT should always have a few major projects at a high level of readiness to quickly respond to new highway funding opportunities. Chapter 7 — Transit The I -494 Corridor Commission strongly endorses TPP Policy 15, which calls for creating a "regional network of transitways" We like table 7 -13 featuring ridership growth since the last policy plan. We take pride in being a part of a 40% increase in bus ridership among suburban providers and a 71% ridership increase in VanGo van pools as 23 of the region's 68 vanpools serve employers along the I494 Corridor. We are concerned, however, that the new transit plan does not make a clear distinction from the previous plan. The old plan, as described on page 97, identified Tier I and Tier H transitway projects. The new plan for transitways, beginning on page 123, does not create a Tier I and Tier lI distinction. If it is the intent of the new transit plan to abandon the tier system, it ought to be plainly stated and provide the reason for the policy change. If it is the intent to maintain a tiered system, then we believe the Southwest Transitway is clearly a Tier I project. Hennepin County, and the communities within the Southwest Transitway have worked methodically and diligently to advance the planning process over the past four years. Due to this work, Southwest Transitway is now poised to follow Central Corridor as the next light rail project ready for construction. We do not fault the recommendation for a systematic transitway corridor analysis. What we do . fault is the anemic goal of implementing only two additional light rail or dedicated busways by 2020 (page 126). Hiawatha light rail is a demonstrated quality transit service success. We believe the demand exists for a regional system of quality transit service. 2008 marked a turnaround for regional transitway funding. Rather than transitway engineering waiting for funding commitments, the funding commitments are now waiting on the planning and engineering. We believe the 2030 plan needs to establish an aggressive timetable for implementing a regional system of transitways. The I -494 Corridor Commission believes the I494 Corridor /American Boulevard corridor will be a vital component and is worthy of a full alternatives analysis study. The draft TPP assumes transit on the "Bloomington Strip" will be BRT on the ring routes and we do not think the Met Council ought to make that assumption before undertaking a full study of all of the options, including the cities as participants in the analysis. The I -494 Corridor Commission also requests that a transit center be depicted in the Normandale Lake District in Figures 7 -20 and 7 -21. 4 I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION BLOOMINGTON * EDEN PRAIRIE * EDINA ' NIINNETONKA * PLYMOUTH * RICHFIELD 494 Commuter Services 5701 Normandale Road, Suite 322 Edina, MN 55424 Telephone: 952- 848 -4947 Fax: 952- 848 -4904 Finally . on page 101. the draft plan seems to bemoan the increased complemt}' of transit governance, almost as though single purpose monopolies %were good and competition was bad. We respectfully disagree. We believe each additional governing body at the transit table has brought energy, new ideas. innovation and public advocacy for transit improvements. Transit in this region would lag far behind current levels but for the active engagement of the opt -out communities and the regional rail authorities. We believe the coordination of the various entities is very manageable. There may be some regional competition, but Ave believe it is healthy and results in advancing better transit service for the residents of the region. In closing, we recognize the region will not be able to build its ,%vay out of traffic congestion, and must be prudent in selecting projects that expand our transportation system but we believe the policy plan needs to acknowledge the necessity of some large scale transportation investments for highways and transit if the region is td grow in economic vitality. We greatly appreciate your consideration of our recommendations and concerns. Sincerely, Sandy Hewitt Chair Copy: Roger Scherer, Metropolitan Council Member — Sector 1 Mary Hill Smith, Metropolitan Council Member — Sector 3 Polly Bowles, Metropolitan Council Member — Sector 5 Kelly Slavik, Mayor of Plymouth Jan Callison, Mayor of Minnetonka Phil Young, Mayor of Eden Prairie Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina Gene Winstead, Mayor of Bloomington Debbie Goettel, Mayor of Richfield 5 BOO LaSalle Avenue CenterPoint® RECEIVED PO Box 59038 Energy M Minneapolis, MN 55459 -0038 NOV 011 November 4, 2008 Mr. Gordon Hughes 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes: I am writing to inform you that on November 3, 2008, CenterPoint Energy filed with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to change its rates for utility distribution service. A rate filing is the regulatory process that public utilities must follow to formally change rates and services for their customers. This filing will affect the rates paid by all of CenterPoint Energy's more than 790,000 customers. The process for changing our rates will take about one year, with interim (temporary) rates implemented on January 2, 2009 and final rates implemented in the fall of 2009. For your information, I enclosed a news release covering some of the basic information about our filing. Please contact me if you have any questions or would like additional information about the filing. Information is available at our Web site at CenterPointEnergy.com/ratecase. Sincerely, Al Swintek Local Government Relations 612- 321 -4799 612 - 321 -4812 Enc. CenterPoint. Energy FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For more information contact Media: Becca Virden Phone 612.321.4879 Investors: Marianne Paulsen Phone 713.207.6500 Additionally, CenterPoint Energy has proposed a pilot rate adjustment mechanism that separates the company's revenue from the volume of natural gas sold. By better aligning the interests of our company and our customers, these rate designs support the promotion of conservation and energy efficiency. Customers will see the first change on bills beginning January 2, when interim rates are expected to take effect. Interim rates will stay in place until a decision is made by the MPUC and the company implements final approved rates. In 2009, public hearings will be held to provide customers and other interested parties the opportunity to comment on the rate request, followed by formal hearings at the MPUC. CenterPoint Energy expects a final decision from the MPUC and the new rates to be implemented in late 2009. If approved, the new rates would generate approximately $59.8 million or 3.9 percent in additional revenue on an annual basis. The effect on individual monthly bills will vary depending on natural gas use and customer class. If final approved rates are lower than interim rates, CenterPoint Energy will refund the difference to customers with interest. If the final rates are higher than the interim rates, customers will not be required to make up the difference. Customers with questions about the proposed change to natural gas distribution rates can call CenterPoint Energy at - 612- 372 -4727 or 1- 800 - 245 -2377, or visit the company's Web site at wwINv. CenterPointEneray.com/ratecase. CenterPoint Energy, Inc., headquartered in Houston, Texas, is a domestic energy delivery company that includes electric transmission and distribution, natural gas distribution, competitive natural gas sales and services, interstate pipelines and field services operations. The company serves more than five million metered customers primarily in Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Texas. Assets total over $18 billion. With about 8,600 employees, CenterPoint Energy and its predecessor companies have been in business for more than 130 years. In Minnesota, CenterPoint Energy is the state's largest natural gas distribution utility, serving nearly 790,000 customers in 260 communities. The utility also operates a non - regulated business in Minnesota called Home Service Plus& For more information, visit the Web site at www.CenterPointEnergy.com Page 2 of 2 CenterPoint. Energy FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For more information contact Media: Becca Virden Phone 612.321.4879 Investors: Marianne Paulsen Phone 713.207.6500 CenterPoint Energy files to change natural gas distribution rates for customers in Minnesota ACINNEAPOLIS —November 3, 2008 - CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP) today filed an application with the Minnesota Public Utility Commission (MPUC) to change the company's natural gas distribution rates. If approved, the new rates will increase the average residential customer's bill by about 6 percent or $5.50 per month. "CenterPoint Energy Minnesota revenues are not keeping pace with increasing costs," said David Baker, CenterPoint Energy's vice president of gas operations in Minnesota. "We recognize the importance of keeping our rates as reasonable as possible; however, the ability to earn a reasonable return on investment is critical to our ability to continue providing safe and reliable service to our customers in Minnesota." This filing seeks approval to change the distribution charge on a customer's natural gas bill, which makes up about 20 percent of the total bill and covers the cost of distributing natural gas. The filing does not apply to the cost of natural gas, which is the wholesale price the company pays for natural gas, and makes up about 80 percent of the bill. The wholesale price of natural gas changes monthly depending on market prices and is passed on directly to customers with no mark -up. The principal reasons CenterPoint Energy is proposing to change base rates are: • Increased operating costs including higher uncollectible customer account expenses and the related collection and customer service costs, along with inflationary increases on other expenses, • Increased expenses related to conservation improvement programs, • Decreased average customer use because of energy efficiency and building construction improvements, and • Increased capital structure costs. -more- Page 1 of 2 RECEIVED NOV 111008 November 10, 2008 Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council Edina City Hall Ladies and Gentlemen, We are writing on behalf of ourselves and the neighbors in the White Oaks neighborhood. It has come to our attention that a group of primarily Morningside residents have petitioned the City to install a sidewalk along the west side of France Avenue from the mid -4500 block through the south end of the 4700 block. We have met as a neighborhood group and found the neighbors to be strongly opposed to said sidewalk. A counter petition, signed by seventy -eight (78) residents of the White Oaks neighborhood, is attached. We have reviewed this issue from several standpoints including environmental, the impact on the Morningside residents, pedestrian and resident safety issues and use of tax dollars. 1. Environmental — Wayne Houle has advised that the installation of a sidewalk is would require removal of all boulevard landscaping in the 4700 block, and possibly some trees in the 4600 block. This would result in the loss of over 25 trees and bushes, with no new landscaping to replace them. In addition, there are a number of trees on private property whose roots systems will be damaged by the installation of the sidewalk and the new retaining wall. As a result, these trees will be weakened and probably die, as happened on Bridge Avenue. The trees provide significant visual and sound screening from France Avenue and the massive utility lines, assist in absorbing pollutants from traffic emissions and provide general green space along France Avenue. The loss of so many trees and green space will be detrimental not only to the property owners along both sides of France Avenue, but also to the White Oaks neighborhood as a whole. 2. Impact on Morningside Residents — A map showing the location of residences of most of the signors of the petition requesting the sidewalk is attached to this letter. A few signers did not provide an address or phone number and therefore are not shown. In addition, letters from two original signers who have withdrawn their signatures and support our position are also attached. It is notable that over half of the signors live three or more blocks east of France. All but a few households could walk to downtown Edina along Grimes and Arden Avenues, which would provide them with a more attractive, more direct and safer (traffic wise) corridor than walking along France Ave. It should also be noted that there is an existing sidewalk along the entire length of the east side of France Avenue. Mayor Hovland and the City Council November 10, 2008 Page.2. 3. Pedestrian Safety Issues — In conversation with White Oaks neighbors, the pedestrian safety raised most frequently was crossing France Ave. Many adults and children from our area need to cross France Avenue, often on a daily basis, to get to schools, parks and Lake Harriet. A safety cross walk at either 47th or 48 street would better serve the community than a sidewalk. 4. Resident Safety Issues - There is currently a guard rail in the middle of the 4700 block of France Avenue. The backyards of the houses protected by the guardrail are very shallow, which means that small children are sometimes playing very close to France. The feasibility study indicates the guard rail will be removed; it says nothing about replacing it. In the event of an accident on France Avenue, children playing in the back yards could be injured or killed. 5. Use of Tax Dollars — We understand that the sidewalk would be paid for out of funds received by the city from the state gas tax fund. Those dollars are available for roadway construction and projects such as the sidewalk. The proposed $250,000 cost to install the sidewalk will not be available for other necessary projects. In addition, the city will have to assume the cost of plowing and maintaining the sidewalk. The White Oaks neighborhood, the one most directly affected by the proposed sidewalk, is at a loss to understand how the Engineering Department could conclude that a sidewalk that will cost $250,000 for two and one half blocks when there is a sidewalk on the other side of the street is "necessary" or "cost effective ". For all of the reasons set forth above, we request that the sidewalk not be installed and that the city explore instead the feasibility of installing a pedestrian crosswalk at 47th or 48th Streets across France Avenue. On behalf of the signors of the accompanying petition, we are Sincerely, 6-0� I /� , Mike Casserly and Karin Wille 4701 Meadow Road 952/924 -0700 Encl. — 7 pages signed petitions Map of signers of original petition - Letters from M. Opp and F. Kraft requesting their name be withdrawn from petition requesting sidewalk October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th Street and 48th Street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name Signature Address Kx c-ti AJ ( 5NFs off. Item a N wl o h ol �'7 m e &-sZ) cJ i" C !i G rJ 9 Lo / �� �� ]top h Cf v o e� k,lDr. r 1U417?,AA10 - \ yv n %Ylo ek- rn --7 & �^ _%y�t 6-, I _`��5�q 4(l I Dow kz)-. 6 03 M e_a October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th Street and 48th Street on the west side of France Avenue. instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. 4W/ _i( P n_ es_Cef6M _. - -- q252aU c955' I October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 40 Street and 48th Street on the west side of France Avenue. instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name . tl TV" S ate► �- �•���.�ear Lo�doin *CAa d �Vy M��-k MaGCR� 21�1 S L� Signature Pe* - Oer Address 9713 i�ca�aw �- 41713 Iq ea Xo.z WId32 Towr.cs 'EA. L4 Wito y 10 i V4. q3"1 ST. x-e -10 a -"-{ -lox October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th street and 48th street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name f; Address er r _ _ qvX 111oLL 12��C C 7 uay71k GVAYX6 W4cVieddcu, Vt�e� `{ 77d�- 2aaa`�� Lnbs M October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 441h Street and 48th Street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name li-q'iff r �i.skQviC�us wyl - Signature ^� �, �;�, u!� Address ((a 50 Ra.na Av>�S v 7P2Z _ October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th street and 48th street on the west side of France Avenue.. Instead , we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name Signature Address 4-da �3`�/3 !J8 `• I I_ Y� C�l0��f� a.�� i ---1 3913 AJ�1 ?� sf• T �s Rk i vp 7f 56 V 12 i i I f f I i I i � I i i i I Page 1 f� October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th street and 48th street on the west side of France Avenue. InsteadC. "'we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 4'' 7 h%br 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join"vith the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. '470-3 `T, ea d, GZ 1 G -//-a -n/O- 1 - �i S 0 Li - ~ —17 t_ ) _ / W � ` T�c < M Mjj Google Maps Goo: Maps - 'rs.,- I �yLe 6� 'JaxxSGn l JALI > i 1 Mirade Mile y w 40th S -- `m o tVV - ' +\ Shopping Center.. ° i - ql m ar 1 I YI C ASS._= Yale Gardens �I Park I �; 1 L — _wblstSt - L�II, Q 14f -02nd St I _ q ( �i111P I I Iyl ice, l Moil orntn g srdo Rd tdornmgslde Rd _ ia; �I L Brovmda:e.. -- =n° Park l>l { n -- aj � ,o, I I •� __ •v;l�_ Sunny Rd" = r Vinnehah'a Creek.; Bridge Page 1 of 3 Get Google Maps on your phone Text the word "GMAPS" to 46645 3 %,mo rwm W ., St _ VJ j$th St _ W 3bth ?t 7c -E., - ,o_�� I °- i3 W. W 39th St n W 99th St - -_- -. y. Vinnikanda y ql i Vista Park r W 40tH 91 r» to W 40th St I I I ED W4 stSt 3 1 ! rol I I 42 ' W 42nd St �~ N N s' nl AI 0 Linden 1 n I ImKills'Park '' mo D N a, ' < - Vr 43rd St 3 � `Cq'9a L m I I b. teA �a Waveland; Park �N II—,JI !� _ arningside Rd —W mo; gym' yj rs � A4Ll� St -� I ID C }� � __� -_i I I I I� DI Iii I I•. II I I ' s; Sir; co L __J:. I Z. N i KI 5 I I i. ml d -- f j I W 4 hat S •A .� rr _I m� i �ci� i 0 ` I tiI i ql a :a� avdg I � - - o Badge .-- m -.'1 I _: - .J -_th -. I ro j ovZ ` m _ ar ml I ? I Im W 48th St -- _ W 18th St — W 43th 51 NI q W 4, I -- — m w I < °m TPA i Pershing 5 aJeY h i' �m i t m c II s Feld D I I- : r�i �c� 9 _ IDS W 49th St VJ 491h St tiN 4 fi! oll Ig ati Gwb tar- 'I i 14 —'.roml - -- - m m i °ok PS �` i N 49112 St �' M la�late 008 Tele alas', M009aNOL-, = - m� n I _ D 9 - ---- -- ' --- -' ' -' .-- Sidewalk Petition Proponents 0 views - Unlisted Created on Oct 28 - Updated 2 days ago By pepinsailor Rate this map - Write a comment 4212 42nd St. Nulty 4304 42nd St Y Kosters httn:/ /mans.aooizle.com/ mans /ms ?hl= en &ie= UTF8 &msa =0 &msid= 11303762413266878... 10/31/2008 uro- Lk _LV7a e:'Cvc"-9-3 (CL _ ply Zs� r�� ; �.�, � } ���, re V November 10, 2008 Re: Proposed sidewalk from 44th to 48th Streets Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am writing to withdraw my name from the petition to install a sidewalk from 44th to 48th Streets along France Avenue. I am concerned about the negative impact such an installation would have on the White Oaks Neighborhood and city in general in terms of removing trees and increasing taxes. The City's resources would be better spent on a crosswalk on France Avenue to give pedestrians access to 44th and France and 50th and France business areas, as well as the Minneapolis lakes and parks. The trees buffering France from the White Oaks homes provide shade, sound buffering and beauty and should be kept intact. They also provide a degree of privacy and safety to the homes along France Avenue, which have recently experienced break -ins. Please consider a crosswalk as an environmentally friendly, less impactful and more cost - effective alternative to the proposed sidewalk. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Molly Opp 4702 Townes Rd. SAC, City Council and Gordon Hughes 4515 West 70th Street Edina, MN 55435 Wednesday November 5, 2008 RE: The Plan for West 70th Street Dear SAC, PYty%ifand Gordon Hughes: These past three years we have asked the City of Edina to listen to us, the Cornelia Arneson neighborhood, about our concerns and solutions to the traffic on West 70th Street. The following letter is a brief history of working on my neighborhood's 70th Street problems with the City of Edina. The recently completed survey indicated the residents voted for Option 1 — Arneson Parkway as defined by the neighborhood. Based on what has happened I have concerns that the city management or some of their designees will twist the survey results for their own purposes. This is why I am concerned: • The city staffs general unwillingness to respond for one year to requests for information. State and county employees and elected state officials were helpful and willing to talk to us • The initial SRF study had us, the neighborhood involved after the conclusions were drawn • The absence of the neighborhood involvement from earlier versions of the three year study • The minimal communication to the residents about significant decision making meetings that affected all Edina residents. I thought that's why Edina has a Communications Department • Public communications thru SRF that implied the neighborhood is first to be considered among the stakeholders and yet a demonstrated behavior that sought to make us invisible • Naming the study "Greater' but yet not getting beyond 70th street for solutions • A 19,000 car per day requirement but no one from the city will explain why it is required This is a defined intention but the city staff will not discuss why • Minimal traffic data collection and yet a study costing $130,000 • When we asked about 77 th, 66th, France and Crosstown we're told they are not in the study • This study does not have an expressed vision behind it. Three years into the study and yet no expressed direction. Is the direction to calm traffic or to move traffic? And if the study is just about collecting data then why the paucity of data?. Again no answer, no one is talking Our three year study is sometimes studied in conjunction with other studies, plans and visions. These plans, studies and vision include the transportation plan, the comprehensive plan, the AWAR plan, the Vision 20/20, the planning plan and the SRF consultants study. Where is the consistency? Where is the comprehensive thought process? I don't see one. What I see is "Throw as many plans at the neighborhood as we can so we keep them confused and hope they go away." Having a big study on a little project (one mile of road) and having no studies on big projects. During these past three years the Westin hotel down the Street has gone from a sought for idea to an operating reality. West 70th street east of France now has a narrower roadbed, reduced speed limit, a beautiful road with beautiful landscaping and a city initiated state variance or two. And all this happened without a three, two or one year study • Our formal requests to apply to open transportation committee positions were ignored The City's reply to open transportation committee positions is, "The positions are closed" • The transportation committee chair would not meet with us: Ostensibly because he wanted to maintain his independence, from whom, the neighborhood? • Rebuilding our section of west 70th street has gone from a 2008 project to a 2012 + project. When was this decided? Given our level of involvement why were we not kept informed? • The most recent SRF study listed us, the neighborhood, as their number one group, unfortunately and actually SRF did not meet with us. • We attend all the relevant City meetings for the past two plus years but we are unable to keep current with "The Plan ". For example, we repeatedly asked SRF at a City meeting on 77th street, 'Who decided the 77th street plan ", after 30 minutes of asking they said, 'We take our direction from the City ". OK then we asked the Traffic Engineer, 'Why is the new 77th street planned this way ?" His reply, "That's a different committee, the AWAR committee ". We were not aware of the AWAR. Why must we have to chase you? • What's going on behind the scenes? Cornelia School was told to not join with us because this was a political problem. Who ordered the school to not get involved? I brought this up twice at city meeting and no one on your side would say anything. The neighborhood was initially excluded from the SAC committee. This committee was to be composed of neighborhood residents. Only at the intercession of a City council person was the neighborhood allowed one representative. Cornelia School and Christ Presbyterian Church, were invited when we were excluded. The school was told to stay out and the church took no public position for two years • Adding a budget to the road design survey was a last minute idea by a SAC volunteer. At the final SAC meeting before sending out the recent questionnaire to the neighborhood a SAC member asked if.he could have an estimated cost attached to each alternative. The City representative said, Oh I suppose we can. You study this for 2 plus years, get to the end of the trail and the concept of price is an afterthought. Are all Edina projects built without concern for a budget? • Greater West 70th street Study Direction: To date what has not yet been addressed is the study direction: Calm traffic or move it? Which one is it? Calming traffic means putting more cars on the highway, moving traffic means moving more people out of the neighborhood. To date the city management refuses to discuss this • The city traffic engineer presented unsubstantiated traffic volumes along with unsubstantiated sources of the traffic at SAC. Do you honestly think the 70th street residents drive in and out of their driveways once every hour all day long? Therefore we are the traffic? One of our neighbors asked the following good question that we too had hoped would have been assessed as part of the "Greater West 70th Street Study ": "All recommendations made being put forth for changes to 70th Street deal with inputs not outcomes. The core question is: "How will volume and speed of traffic on 70th Street be reduced if any of the recommendations are put into place ?" Please list the estimated reductions in volumes and speed for each recommendation. Example, a roundabout at West Shore will reduce traffic volume by x•/ and speed by x%. Only after it is known what the outcome in reductions for each change is predicted to be can one decide whether any new assessment is warranted." • Why is this Greater study so narrow? Why is 70th street studied by itself and not in conjunction with the adjacent high capacity roads? Why is our study not evaluated in conjunction with the comp plan and the city's vision for the neighborhoods? • The survey and survey results ramble. Look at the confusing way SRF summarizes the data as compared to our way Apparent lack of transparency Last week the city manager attempted to formally change west 70tH from a Collector street to a B -Minor arterial. This designation change would allow increasing road volume to 30,000 cars. This doubles our road's capacity. You proposed this to the city council as "Update of Comprehensive Plan Roadway Functional Class System". The effect of this would automatically increase the approved traffic volume on west 70tH street from 15,000 cars per day to 30,000 cars per day. Why have a three year $130,000 SRF study and SAC evaluation of a 1,000 resident survey when with one sweep of the pen you find a way to double the legal road traffic? Regarding swapping the city, owned land for private land for a new public works building: This past winter over four hundred people signed a petition to bring the issue of the sale of the Public Works Dept. land to the public's attention. The petition was rejected because it did not comply with some law from the 1940's. This say's one developer can walk in the front. door and is given consideration but 400 plus Edina residents signing a petition request in the winter cold are given no consideration. I would have thought a community discussion would be more important than some law from 1948. The city staff interpreted things differently • Town Hall meetings, why? The September 18th Sun Current that the City council will have twice a year town meetings and in a place to make people feel more comfortable. It is my opinion that the problem is something more than a lack of town hall meetings We are interested in rebuilding our street as an authentic parkway. The reality for us is Edina is too nice of a city to not have a parkway. How do you see it? Signed Colb ilkins West 70th Street Road Design Comparisions Submitted by Greater West 70th St. Homeowners Association Option I Option 2 Option 3Option 4 Proposed Option "Arneson "Modified "Three "Status "Round- "Traffic "Hybrid Name Parkway ". A.P." Lane" Quo" abouts" Lights" Combo" Proposer Neighborhood Edina /SRF Edina /SRF No One SRF -A SRF -B SRF -C Traffic Flow Concerns Though Car Diversion Though Truck Diversion Traffic Volume Reduction Traffic Speed Reduction Entering From Side Streets Exiting to Side Streets Side Street Cut - Throughs Street Resident Concerns On Street Parking Neighborhood Yards Preserved Left Turns From Homes Safety Concerns Auto /Auto Traffic Interaction Auto /Non -Car Traffic Interaction Pedestrian Crossing Biking Other Alternative Vehicle Walking Other Major Concerns Traffic Noise Ease of Plowing & Maintenance Emergency Vehicle Access Financial & Timing Concerns Cost to Build Years to Complete Value Rating Score: Value Key:Q = 10 0 =5 • =0 O ® • • • • • • O ! O 4 O • O a O O • • D • O O O O • O O O D O O • 0 • ® ® O • ® (b • ® •. O O O O • O • ® • ® • • • ® O • O Q O O O O O O O ® ® (3) • (9) Q Q O O O O 0 0 O O • ® • 190 95 70 85 40 70 55 A. e To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: Correspondence Info /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance F-1 Discussion Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. TO Mayor Jim Hovland RECEIVED Council Members: Ann Swenson NOV 18 2008 Scott Housch Linda Masica Joni Bennett Engineering Dept: Wayne Houle Jack Sullivan FROM: Mary Jo Aiken I am writing to you to ask for your support of the petition submitted earlier this year concerning the installation of a sidewalk from Sunnyside Road to 48th Street. This is the only stretch of France Avenue without a sidewalk and is a very serious safety issue in addition to making it a difficult path to the 50th Street business area. It is also unattractive. The traffic on France has become dangerously fast and is a threat to children getting off of school buses and commuters downloading from municipal buses who need to cross the street. They must stand in the street and take their lives in their hands to reach home. If you are handicapper you can scarcely handle the challenge. In addition to the safety factor a sidewalk would make this area look more like it belonged to Edina and would almost certainly increase the value of the properties. There is currently a petition from the White Oaks area asking that the request be denied. They are basing their opposition on the fear of an assessment and the removal of 40 to 50 trees. Neither one of these assumptions are true. I have been assured by council sources that the necessary funds for this project are available and no assessments are necessary. It may be necessary to remove a few younger trees on the boulevard but not on private property. If you look at the original petition, you will see that many people in addition to France Avenue residents would like to see this improvement. It would allow them a safe walk to the 50th and France business area. Please support us. Mary Jo Aiken 4548 France Avenue South 952 -926 -5030 Jeremiah Mostrom 4544 France Ave South Edina, MN 55410 November 18, 2008 To: Mayor Jim Hovland RECEIVED NOV 181008 CC: City Council Members: Ann Swenson, Scott Housch, Linda Masica, Joni Bennett Engineering Dept: Wayne Houle, Jack Sullivan 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 I am a current resident of Edina. I am writing to ask for your support in favor of the France Ave Sidewalk Improvement No: S 101. I firmly believe that this section of France Ave from Sunnyside Road to 48`h Street is in desperate need of a sidewalk. Not having this sidewalk is a very severe safety'concern for me, many of my neighbors and my family. I believe there is a huge benefit to the safety and wellbeing of our city by adding this side walk. Consider: The speed of traffic flow on this section of France has become offensively fast and the amount of traffic continues to increase- creating a very dangerous atmosphere. Furthermore, children, elderly, disabled, and those without transportation can hardly leave their homes without facing the dangers of this busy road. It would seem that in addition to increased safety; adding this sidewalk would bring business growth, better property values, increased wellbeing though the ability safely go for a walk and the elimination of greenhouse emissions through better access to public transportation. It has been brought to my attention that there is a petition from people in the White Oaks neighborhood asking a cross walk instead of sidewalk. Their basis for opposition: Lost trees and assessments. From the information that has been provided to me, these do not hold credence. Are these tradeoffs that we really want to make? I am looking forward to your response on this matter. Please support my family and my neighbors in making our lives as Edina residents safe and well. Dear City Council members, RECEIVED NOV 18 2008 I'm writing because I support a more progressive, environmentally - friendly recycling service for the city of Edina. I'd like to suggest that the city consider switching providers to Eureka Recycling, a company that puts a lot of care into recycling by educating households about what is and is not recyclable and by seeing to it that as much as possible actually gets recycled, unlike some other services. Many forward - thinking cities are making the switch. I first read about Eureka in this article: http: / /www. startribune. com/ locaUwest /29472214.html ?elr= KArksLTUUU Then I found Eureka's website here: hltp://www.eurekarecycliniz.oriz I hope you will consider this change. Thank you, Sarah Sarah Moran, health writer office: 952- 303 -4123 cell: 952- 221 -8788 SarahLynnMoranggmail.com www.SarahLyLinMoran.com www.SarahLynnMoran.blogspot.com Dear Mayor, City Council, Chmn. Brown and SAC RECEIVED NOV 181008 15 November 2008 The underlying question that needs to be answered regarding the 70th Street reconstruction involves the manner in which it will be funded. The recent Greater Cornelia study indicated clearly that few property owners are willing to pay for the proposed reconstruction options. By extension, this should imply that the public supports a retention of MnDOT funding and status. The only proposed option that would have the support of MnDOT, without variances of uncertain approval, is the "current/as -is" roadway option. Fiscal constraint would dictate the rejection of the alternative options as they would fail the litmus necessary for application of state aid funds. The City of Edina receives its allotment of state -aid road funds each year. It is the responsibility of Edina, not MnDOT, to allocate those funds to specific roadways. Considering the history of road reconstruction in Edina, especially the lack of action at West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard, what is the conceivable timeline under which reconstruction will occur on the Cornelia portion of West 70th Street? 70th and Metro Boulevard went as far as to receive council approval, yet has been "placed on hold" for more than a decade. Where do 70th Street's current roadway and utility ratings place it in position within the priorities of the reconstruction schedule? A roadway option that requires approval of variances is not guaranteed. If the variance is not approved, 100% of the cost is assessed to the abutted property owners. The impacted residents need to be aware of this important distinction. For your Consideration, Jan Ferrell 4704 West 70th Street Y /-k 0I To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 18, 2008 Subject: Canvass of Recount of Council Member Race REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item Canvass Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Recommendation: Adopt the attached Report of Canvass of Administrative Recount Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Info /Background: Following the November 4, 2008 General Election the margin of separation between the second and third vote getters was 130 votes. The losing candidate Josh Sprague requested an administrative recount of the voted ballots. The recount was conducted Thursday, November 13, 2008, in the Edina City Council Chambers. The City Clerk supervised the recount with fourteen election judges and two Edina staff members counting the ballots. Changes to note from the November 4, 2008 report of canvass are: • Pct 1A - Edina staff was notified on Monday, November 10th of an absentee ballot that had been erroneously delivered by Hennepin County to Minneapolis, where the ballot had been rejected. When the error was discovered, Hennepin County requested Edina Staff review a scan of the ballot return envelope and compare it to the voter's application for absentee ballot to ascertain whether the ballot should be accepted. Following this review, Edina staff notified Hennepin County the ballot should be accepted. Hennepin County staff then opened the ballot and added it to their abstract for the Hennepin County Canvass. Edina staff then requested the ballot be returned to Edina for inclusion in the administrative recount. It was returned and included in the recount. • Pct 1A Sprague increased 4 votes based on hand count that could determine voter intent, one absentee ballot, two ballots marked with pencil and one ballot marked with blue pen. • Pct 7 Ballot marked with pencil for Sprague very light mark, but voter intent was discernable. • Pct 10 Ballot showed two candidates ovals marked clearly with additional marginal mark so that voter's intent could not be determined resulting in deduction from both candidates. • Pct 11 Ballot had two ovals marked, but also had two names written in. However, write -in ovals were not filled in. Could not determine voter intent, ballot not counted for that office. Deduction of one ballot for Sprague. • Pct 17 Ballot had circles drawn tracing four candidates' ovals. In two cases Brindle and Swenson the trace ran deep enough into circle to be read by machine, but not on the other two. candidates. After having different teams review the ballots repeatedly only 534 ballots were found for Brindle. Attached is a report of canvass for the Council to review and adopt. I have also attached the summary statement signed by the staff conducting the recount. _ . % REPORT OF CANVASS OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECOUNT OF THE OFFICE OF COUNCIL MEMBER FROM THE GENERAL ELECTION, NOVEMBER 4, 2008 FOR THE CITY OF EDINA ELECTION HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2008 The Edina City Council inspected and compared the summary statement certified by the Election Judges following the administrative recount for the office of Council Member held Thursday, November 13, 2008 The votes_ cast were certified as follows: with Mary Brindle were elected to a term as Council Member for a four year term commencing January 6, 2009. ADMINISTRATIVE RECOUNT 2008 CITY ELECTION COUNCIL MEMBER Precinct Name & No. 11104108 Votes Counted For Brindle 11104108 Votes Counted For Sprague RECOUNT Number of Ballots For Brindle Difference RECOUNT Number of Ballots For Sprague Difference 1A-Shepherd of The Hills 430 425 430 0 429 4 1 B -Chapel Hills 493 442 493 0 442 0 2 Edina Sr. Center 378 425 378 0 425 0 3 Covenent Church 439 477 439 0 477 0 4 Weber Park 420 470 420 0 470 0 5 Highlands School 496 579 496 0 579 0 6 Countryside School 528 437 528 0 437 0 7 Normandale Church 392 306 392 0 307 1 8 Southview School 432 419 432 0 419 0 9 Concord School 449 398 449 0 398 0 10 Creek Valley School 626 332 625 -1 331 -1 11 Creek Valley Church 575 494 575 0 493 -1 12 Comelia School 218 447 218 0 447 0 13 Centrum Bldng 307 252 307 0 252 0 14 St. Peters Church 421 532 421 0 '532 0 15 Valley View School 565 530 565 0 530 0 16 Ameson Acres Park 295 532 295 0 532 0 17 Southdale Library 536 427 534 -2 427 0 18 Edinborou h 332 252 332 0 252 0 19 Calvary Church 213 239 213 .0 239 0 Totals 8545 1 8415 8542 -3 8418 3 Dated this 18th day of November 2008. RECOUNT SUN STATEMENT Recount of Votes Cast. office of City Council State General Election November 4, 2008 Precinct Name 8 # November 4, 2008 Votes Counted For Brindle November 4, 2008 Votes Counted For Sprague RECOUNT Number of Ballots For Brindle RECOUNT Number of Ballots For Sprague RECOUNT Brindle Ballots Challenged By Sprague RECOUNT Sprague Ballots Challenged By Brindle Recount Team Initals Date Precinct Completed IA-Shepherd of The Hills 430 425 430 429 ection Judoe Date 113-Chapel Hills 493 442 493 442 2 Edina Sr. Center 378 425 378 425 3 Covenent Church 439 477 439 477 4 Weber Park 420 470 420 470 5 Highlands School 496 579 496 579 6 Countryside School 528 437 528 437 7 Normandale Church 392 306 392 307 8 Southview School 432 419 432 419 9 Concord School 449 398 449 398 10 Creek Valley School 626 332 625 331 11 Creek Valley Church 575 494 575 493 12 Comelia School 218 447 218 447 13 Centrum Bldng 307 252 307 252 14 St. Peters Church 421 532 421 532 15 Valley View School 565 530 565 530 16 Arneson Acres Park 295 532 295 532 17 Southdale Library 536 427 534 427 18 Edinborou h 332 252 332 252 19 Calvary Church 213 239 213 239 Totals 8545 8415 8542 8418 We gertify that the numbe,"ntereii on this recount summary statement correctly show the recounted 1�—/ 3 -ecq Date /7— ab Date number of vote r each candidate in this recount. 1 I -T3- ture of Reco fficial Date Election Judge Date F1e CAACA,, J"dy- 1113 -.()9 Date l ( -13-0P Date 11-13 - D to Da e 1i/i3�o9 Date c t o9 Date k Signature of Recount uunnt Offi ' I� -�-- / Date e n Judge Date/ / I ion udge �P Date 3 /0op Election J d Date 15.45 ection Judoe Date 1�—/ 3 -ecq Date /7— ab Date number of vote r each candidate in this recount. 1 I -T3- ture of Reco fficial Date Election Judge Date F1e CAACA,, J"dy- 1113 -.()9 Date l ( -13-0P Date 11-13 - D to Da e 1i/i3�o9 Date c t o9 Date k .r. Page 1 of 1 Heather Worthington To: jhovland @krauserollins.com; anns @hoigaards.com; Joni Bennett; Immasica @aol.com; scot.housh@willis.com Cc: Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague Subject: Building Heights Attachments: Building heights.pdf Hi: Cary gathered the data you asked for last night regarding building heights in the Gallagher area, and the Cahill area. It's attached as a pdf file. I'll also include a copy in your packet. Thanks! HW 11/14/2008 Heather Worthington Assistant City Manager, ICMA -CM City of Edina. Minnesota www.cityofedina.com 952 - 826 -0415 (direct) 952 - 826 -0390 (fax) LOGISMap Output Page Page I of I X5416 11 24 51773173 �- !T— 7000 7001 5601 JSaS� 14: 5400 r ,_i4. J e %011 70715727; ?ODO� Tool 1 r —�553A ' I. �. 5555 5540= 7 5314 . 1-,.� 5300. 24 3169 X765 � SS:r!. ;, 5 I I`. _ _ 515, 7005 70D4� , 7004 700. 7009 5565 74 5 75 415 .530E 5306 ti hr- pine :576' 1 .� 5 5553 1 5317 128 7 I SJ 7CfI 561 5220 � 7D73 5 55:7( 5112 5205 � 51,;, ! y 7u7s 7013 7011 7009 7077 �s21. ,, ` 7029 7075 24 _ �L�_ -• -- — / 5570 5531 702770257029 r0 7077 ,7Ui2 7016 To,(, ,7077 ^' 5536 55;7 ]0 I ~~ .3512 f 7 7 7`517 55a 03 7075 55_i8L• 7116 1 j? tU0' 7701 7010 7041 —'�- L'? 5530 706 7'1'64 7107 I 0 - -- L 15{ 7 70 {I 171 105r•r044 '7 101 24 I� 5506 6 74 9 . �. 2 5309 27708 1.709 �• 101 7105 _ 1,'777517173±7 !71051 :'_...__._._.,_..... -. .7 O 75/ I i 1 -. 14; / i ?116 �'i7117+108I 109 10 i, 1152 7125 24 �7Y25 --j- �__J ( —I 1772(, 7121112 7113 j 77)1 7200 72,00 Ldo7 7116 •7117 24 X204 I J ��__ _._. -._ 7213 -227 �:705 7200 '7201 7240 72291) 4 _ i4 I �J : 7136 — 1� 7725 Z 1I 7 1 "206 7109 7204 1720514[ 24 7232..130 7213 •� e 7228 ` 7220 7212 7113:7200' 720 -1 D x274 72,20 7 723 4 12,11! I 7217 �'.. 7720 x 115 7-, 1t' 5250 5230 7221X216/ 72797, '` CC 7275 7237 275'7220.1 1213 7- 4 7277 1., `F2C1 7250 7240 U 57247300( 7301 7JOD ` 15720 J' • .% 73RD 1v 73055708 _7 730174 •,24; H R �LJ IJ00 21 -- 1 572 S a 5711 jJ LLr�is Park y 73.0 57215717 v I 7375 5709 5705 5707 5243 7375` 7360 5608 5716 5712 _ Bt1Y 5c'SVIC£ (gin 7322 5704 5700 5640 5800 5708 — L5736� FD 7100 7401 21. 743f� 7460 % In 24 7400 7387 5252 5200 7370 •1nd T456'740J 7405 7401 24 ;74UBIa 74" � U 0 .7121) 7451 L--� 7020 } ;7412. 7471 _4 �9! 7418 476 i 7415 7 i4y26 ,7 11� Oa D 7 {a4 7420 7119 p 1 Z l 4� 7400 7403 5251 24 7450 7450 7440 7423��p ,J -744 2."400 74 7424 / • \ U X24 `� \ .2 2a 24 1. , .74$j 7154 )4707 E2 1 14 •16 7550 5290 5150 5162 5167 5167 rr r— •5708 I n 11,tSR01 1800 5712 L i' 15716 •..� h 74 . - 5720 57 01 24, 37 f 0 7600 ?, �SI275723 57,, EoP�n 1a, 'a`!cO 7635 ;601 7630 / 11 606 r '24 L-T F--+— 1 7600 5735 - — -7701 C,3 )/ \ ((! 1771077261714 - 77O5N .7700 7705' ' 1700 \ !•7u '.LS,: ::1•rrMCNS -g[(.. ..4GLY, 2{ j ;711 - ' littp: / /gis.logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClicntV ersi... 11/14/2008 LOGISTAap Output Page Page 1 of 1 ��45DB 4500 v 7 I '44214417 �'-- •+-- t_- ___i1J% 7136— T1377tTE— )1797Y1R- 719977 ?A --J I _ 4504 4436 4426 7201. 4517 4513 y� J 444 45�,H1� 4424 ;17iJ 4 405 7?0111200� 1"201172001 17201., 7200 17261720?, 7201 24 4509 4505 / 1 1 4417 7204 7?OS 7204 72057204 7205 7204 `7205 7204 7205 7200 ,,,,,,,,,,,,(((( 2 4501 4444443744 11 4429 f 1 7 t 7206: 7209 200 14436 '�^7 4408 7208 7TD9.720br 7209720, �720p - 7. y'- 7200 �2t3 4412 4425 4105 7213' i 1 1208 7708 0' 204 4+_ ' 4424' 1 4404 721'2 7213777'2 7213 7135 7717 7208 4451 4440,,. 4416 4412 4400 1216 72171 ?IG 72177216 II � 7111 �" 7150 7271 7272 452 - 4d45'�� 7721 ` i 72217220 v 0 _ 4452 4448 4441 :7433` . �'�\ �`�N . 1 1 1 7275 7300 1`l� 4429 4471 4400 4405 1710177 T� 7225722J1 7 ?77 7322 1 4444 44.10 4416 4425 4417 4413 4401 7305 ' 1301 7301 7301730D� 1 CJ09 7301 ``f 5420 :�— " 7300 MIS 1 4411 44244416.4084104 7705 73057JOt 7308 173054 ��442p 1 7304 c 7307 7309- , f 453 _ 7J 13 I 7309 7306 '� 0 �, 3121 131344497 4437 44 3J Se .1 Fli 4O 1i 44 7317: 3081 7313.7317 7111 3627 7373-0 ' + 2. 4411441/ 4405 .71277312 i r -� 71112 1 _4429 4421 44094 401 1 73177310, 3177310 7315 • +� 445 #dD8 4500 44_84424 4412144D444D0 7325 13141 73117 ?ZO r, 7d 510 I 11 1 1 1 4416 4406 1 1 1 173297320 i 731- 7350 a 1 C.•,r cl tiny La6c tw r 1 ^ 7321 1100 7 ?37- /711111 „ 7723 7 46D946054FT9457; 4$17450.94501 44 ?54177 4dD94415 17337 73,24, 777AII 7 40 •mac L4601 45254573 45051 43Y7 7370 G 4600 4576 4512 4504 4500 7401 7400 7401 , 7300 '373 1 14.520 1 145fis 7405 7405! 4700 < 4000 .7402 7410 7400 HEMSIV5 A VE 7409 �• 7401 45,09 4509 4505174081 741.1 24 74^00 :NOS 7412 , U6.9 1 7417 4251 4201 i 7404 1 4508 4504 7416 5 J �_d52C 1516 ]4?1 7450 7401 7408 7.71 '7, -4� 7501 4425 4 1 1, 1417 4505 4501 7505 wkr El,.. Part. 415 3955 J �'1742 4517 45 09 L J- 7500 ; 4774571 !C35 1 7425 } 2 ?d 5 '4440 P i �.' 4446 4444 4200 4100 7550 7507 ! 24 4 6 4 T 4000 1 rre iiichards Golf C rsc i 7630• .c 7600 11TH S W ,J ' 1 't 7625 4451 76019 4175 7600 7005 4530 ; 4401 1 7665 / 4640 4620 4510 4550 4540 / ] n 6 -0570 51 7775 - Z4 Ay s 24 1n \, 4565 7140 ti b 7701 c`� 4425 4545 4455 4445 4445 4415 b 4555 C. •5.111 http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_A - cIMS/ ims? SeiviceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 11/14/2008 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2008, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 WEST 50T" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Laura Benson, Vice Chairman, Bob Kojetin, Karen Ferrara, Lou Blemaster, Arlene Forrest, Connie Fukuda, Jean Rehkamp Larson, and Elizabeth Montgomery MEMBERS ABSENT: Chris Rofidal STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant Shannon Neale, 4623 Drexel Avenue Sarah Wildman, Lake Country Builders Doug Johnson, Building Concepts & Design Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. Sheilagh Ziegwewid, 4615 Wooddale Avenue Mickey Armstrong, Coldwell Banker Burnet Realty John McDonald, Edina Realty Kathy Peterson, 4617 Wooddale Avenue I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: September 8, 2008 Member Kojetin moved approval of the minutes from the September 8, 2008 meeting. Member Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: A. Certificates of Appropriateness H -08 -12 . 4623 Drexel Avenue — New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4600 block of Drexel Avenue. The existing home, constructed in 1930, has a 2 -car attached garage accessed by a driveway on the southerly side of the property. The COA request involves building a new, 483 square foot detached garage in the rear yard, and converting the existing 2 -stall attached garage into living Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board space. The plan illustrates the new garage will maintain 3 foot setback from the rear and side lot line, the minimum required by code. A new curb cut will not be required since the proposed garage will be accessed by the existing driveway. The new 2 -stall detached garage is proposed to measure 21' x 23' or 483 square feet in area. The design of the structure is proposed to complement the architectural style of the home with stucco clad walls, half timber trim and brackets, consistent with the Tudor architectural style. Attention to detail with windows and doors is demonstrated on the north, south, and west elevations. The east facade was intentionally void of windows since it borders a privacy fence. Asphalt shingles are proposed for the 8/12 pitch of the hip roof. The height of the proposed.garage is shown to be 16.29' at the highest peak, which is five feet less than the average height of surrounding detached garages. The height at the mid -point of the gable is shown to be 12.5', and a height of 8.8' is provided at the eave line. The ridge line is shown to be 4.9' in length due to the hip roof. The maximum lot coverage allowed for the property is 30 %. Construction of the proposed 483 sq. ft. garage will create a total lot coverage of 29.5 %, within the limits allowed by city codes. Consultant Vogel opined that the proposed detached garage qualifies as an appropriate treatment for construction of a new garage in the district. The design appears to be compatible with the size, scale, mass, and materials of the historic house and will not have an adverse visual impact on the historic character of adjacent properties or the neighborhood. The lack of decorative detailing on the east (rear) elevation is off -set by the presence of rear -yard fencing and the small setback between the garage and the fence. Vogel added that the proposed conversion of the existing attached. garage to living space also appears to be consistent with historic preservation standards. FINDINGS: Planner Repya offered the following findings supporting the subject COA request: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The plans demonstrate design that abides by the requirements of the Country Club District Plan of Treatment and the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Planner Repya concluded that staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new garage subject to: 2 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board The plans presented. The condition that a year built (2008) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached garage. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: Member Rehkamp Larson commented that she liked the scale of the garage, and believed it will be a nice complement to the house. Board members expressed their agreement with Rehkamp Larson. Member Kojetin stated that he liked the comparison elevations provided for the neighboring garages — the information was concise and demonstrated that the proposed plan was in keeping with the neighborhood. APPLICANT COMMENTS: None to add to Staff's presentation. MOTION & VOTE: Following a brief discussion, Member Forrest moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request subject to the plans presented and a year built sign or plaque be affixed to the garage. Member Rehkamp Larson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. 2. H -08 -13 4517 Drexel Avenue — Remove Existing Detached and Construct a New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property, located on the east side of the 4500 block of Drexel Avenue, was constructed in 1935, and currently has a 2 -car detached garage in the southeast corner of the rear yard accessed by a driveway on the southerly side of the property. The COA request involves demolishing the existing 535 square foot detached garage and building a new, 598 square foot detached garage in its place. The plan illustrates the new garage will maintain 4 foot setback from the rear and side lot line. A new curb cut will not be required since the proposed garage will be accessed by the existing driveway. The lot coverage for the property with the new, larger garage will be 29.7% - the maximum allowed is 30% The new 2 -stall detached garage is proposed to measure 26' x 23' feet in area. The design of the structure is shown to complement the Tudor architectural style of the home with Hardi stucco siding on the walls, and trim boards around the windows and doors. Attention to detail is demonstrated with double -hung windows on the north and south elevations. The west elevation, which is visible from the front street, is shown to have carriage garage doors, a shuttered window and bracket with bead board trim in the gable peak, and a small gabled overhang 3 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board with brackets and bead board trim, projecting one foot from the building wall, over the service door on the north side of the overhead doors. The east (rear) elevation is shown to have bracket and bead board detailing in the gable end to match the west elevation. Asphalt shingles are proposed for the 6/12 pitch of the roof. The height of the proposed garage is shown to be 15.6' at the highest peak. The height at the mid -point of the gable is shown to be 13.0', and a height of 8.25' is provided at the eave line. The ridge line is shown to be 24 feet in length. Consultant Vogel observed that the proposed structure appears to meet the requirements of the Country Club District plan of treatment for construction of new detached garages. The garage depicted in the plans appears compatible with the character of the historic house with respect to size, scale, mass, and materials. He added that he did not believe the new garage would have an adverse visual impact on the historic character of adjacent properties or the neighborhood. The lack of decorative detailing on the east (rear.) elevation is not an issue due to the fact that the new garage backs up to the existing garage on the property directly to the east of 4517 Drexel - -if that adjacent garage were to be removed in the future, the visual impact of the east - facing blank wall of the subject property could be mitigated with fencing and /or vegetation. FINDINGS: Planner Repya offered the following findings in support of the COA request: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Repya concluded that staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new garage subject to: • The plans presented. • The condition that a year built (2008) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached garage. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: Member Rehkamp Larson questioned the use of Hardi -Board stucco siding in lieu of traditional stucco, pointing out that the product comes in panels with seams which are visible. Member Kojetin observed that in the past the Board has approved COA's for detached garages with "non- authentic" exterior materials that match the house. 4 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Consultant Vogel agreed. APPLICANT COMMENTS: Doug Johnson, Building Design & Concepts, representing the homeowner, stated that the use of Hardi -board stucco siding in lieu of traditional stucco was a cost saving measure. MOTION & VOTE: Following a brief discussion, Member Kojetin moved approval of the COA subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque or sign be affixed to the garage. Member Ferrara seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. "Member Blemaster complimented the applicants of both COA applications heard this evening for the clear and concise plans and supporting materials provided. She added that the required pre - application meeting with the planner, when the necessary information is discussed, appears to be providing clear direction which serves the applicant and the Board very well. Board members agreed with Ms. Blemaster. 3. H -08 -14 4615 Wooddale Avenue — Preliminary COA Demolition of House & Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4600 block of Wooddale Avenue. The existing 2 -story American Colonial home was constructed in 1930, and is one of the smallest homes in the district with a footprint of 793 square feet in area. The original single stall detached garage is located in the middle of the rear yard, 20 feet from the lot line and 29 feet from the north lot line and 22 feet from the south lot line. The subject request involves a preliminary review of a request to demolish the existing home and garage with the intention of building a new home /garage that meets the district's plan of treatment criteria. Because the home was constructed prior to 1944, and is considered an historic resource, the following standards from the District's Plan of Treatment apply to such requests: No Certificate of Appropriateness will be approved for the demolition, in whole or in part, of any heritage preservation resource in the district unless the applicant can show that the subject property is not a heritage preservation resource, or no longer contributes to the historical significance of the district because its historic integrity has been compromised by deterioration, damage, or by inappropriate additions or alterations. 5 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board • Except in extraordinary circumstances involving threats to public health or safety, no Certificate of Appropriateness will be issued for the demolition of an existing heritage preservation resource in the district without an approved design plan for new construction. The applicant, Scott Busyn, Good Neighborhood Homes, Inc. provided the Board with a detailed listing and photographs supporting his assertion that because the existing home and garage have extensive damage, deterioration, and safety /code compliance issues, demolition is warranted. Addressing the subject request, Consultant Vogel advised the Board that they need to keep in mind the following two fundamental concepts embodied by the district Plan of Treatment: 1. The Country Club District derives its historical significance from being a unified entity, reflecting the Thorpe Bros. plan of development that was implemented in 1924 -1944; and 2. The guiding design review principle is rehabilitation, which is defined as the process of returning a heritage resource to a state of utility through repair or alteration that makes possible an efficient contemporary use (while preserving those features which are significant to the preservation value of the landmark district). Vogel pointed out that new construction is appropriate in heritage landmark districts when it is compatible .in size, scale, and materials with historic, homes and the character of the streetscape; and while, it is true that heritage preservation resources are not renewable, city policy recognizes that preservation of every old building is not a responsible preservation practice. The HPB has been given, the responsibility for determining the heritage preservation value of the house at 4615 Wooddale by considering its individual significance and its importance in relation to other historic homes and to the district as a whole. The challenge is to consider how the loss of this particular house will affect the character of the district and neighboring historic homes - -and, if it is decided demolition of the house is justified, a strategy must be devised for mitigating the adverse effects of the teardown and ensuring that the new house will be of greater significance to the preservation of the district than the existing structures. The findings which could support the approval of demolition include: 1. The subject property does not meet the criteria for individual designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. 2. While it meets the minimum criteria for consideration as a contributing resource in the Country Club Heritage Landmark District, the existing house is not an outstanding example of the property type, nor is it one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the District. L9 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board 3. The preliminary COA constitutes HPB approval of a concept for redevelopment of the property based on the developer mitigating the effects of the demolition of the existing house and garage by undertaking historical and architectural documentation that meets the pertinent standards established by the U.S. Department of the Interior. 4. Rehabilitation of the existing house may represent.an economic hardship for the owner; and 5. It is technically feasible to design and build a replacement house and garage that will maintain the historic character of the streetscape and demonstrably contribute to the overall historical significance of the Country Club District. Furthermore, Vogel recommended that if determined appropriate, approval of the COA should be subject to the following conditions: The COA constitutes conceptual approval for a plan to redevelop the property and shall be in effect for a period of not more than 180 days. The HPB reserves the right to disapprove any COA application for demolition that does not meet the requirements of the district plan of treatment. 2. Before the HPB initiates design review of any demolition or new construction, the applicant will provide the City Planner with the following: a) A report from a licensed architect or professional engineer as to the structural soundness of the existing home and its adaptability for rehabilitation; b) An independent appraisal of the property's fair market value in its current condition; and c) An itemized breakdown as to the economic feasibility or rehabilitation of the existing house compared with new construction, including an estimate of the costs that would need to be incurred to comply with the district plan of treatment and applicable building code and zoning regulation. 3. No COA for demolition or new construction will be approved until the applicant submits historical and architectural documentation of the existing house and garage, said documentation to consist of written information, photographs, and drawings prepared to the city's specifications. and approved by the city's preservation planning consultant. Consultant Vogel recommended that before a final decision is made on a COA for new construction, the applicant should provide the Board and its staff with 7 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board plans, drawings, written information, material samples, and other information which demonstrate that the new house and garage will substantially match the architectural style, detailing, character, and mood of typical Colonial Revival period houses constructed in the Browndale section of the Country Club District between 1924 and 1944 by adhering to the architectural requirements in the original Thorpe Bros. deed restrictions, and achieving visual consistency with the size, scale, color, and materials of adjacent historic homes and the character of the streetscape of Wooddale Avenue. Vogel pointed out that if demolition of the existing home is approved, it is important the design of a replacement house must have the distinctive characteristics that make up the traditional Colonial Revival style house in the Country Club District, including but not limited to the two -story rectangular volume covered by a gable roof, symmetrical and balanced disposition of windows and doors, clapboard or brick wall cladding, classical detailing in the form of engaged columns, cornices, entablatures, and double -hung windows and small panes, and shutters, and a detached garage. Contemporary or Neocolonial designs, street - facing facade features, exterior finish materials, and color schemes would not be considered appropriate for either the house or garage. HOMEOWNER COMMENTS: Sheilagh Ziegeweid, the current owner of 4615 Wooddale Avenue explained, that she has lived in the home since 1969. During the past 39+ years the Country Club neighborhood has experienced dramatic changes. Her home has served her well, but now, at the age of 73, she finds she can no longer afford to live in a home with $8,000 per year in property taxes, not to mention the mounting home maintenance issues. Mrs. Ziegeweid stated that she has been attempting to sell her home for over a year and has not had one offer. She stated that she is desperate and in need of getting out from under this home that nobody wants. Mickey Armstrong, realtor for Mrs. Ziegeweid advised the Board that at least five contractors have evaluated the house, and all have determined that it is not a candidate for an addition out the back, which is the only alternative available if this request is not granted. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: Member Ferrara stated she has a problem with the assumption that because the house is "too small" it's easier to just tear it down instead of remodeling it. Member Forrest questioned the procedure for addressing a request for demolition of a home classified as a "heritage resource" — particularly since the Plan of Treatment stipulates that no COA for demolition will be issued without an approved design plan for new construction. Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Planner Repya explained that this is the first COA request for demolition of a heritage resource property since the new plan of treatment was approved in April, 2008. The rationale for a preliminary COA is to first determine whether or not the property qualifies for demolition, as identified in the findings. The recommended conditions which accompany approval of the preliminary COA make it clear that no COA for demolition and new construction will be approved without meeting said conditions, which include an approved design plan. Reflecting on the listing of building code deficiencies identified in the applicant's request, Member Rehkamp Larson commented that all homes built in the era of the subject property will have non - compliance issues with the current building codes, and she questioned whether that should be included as justification for demolition. APPLICANT COMMENTS: Scott Busyn, the applicant explained that as he understands the Plan of Treatment, he must first justify the demolition of the property. If and when the demolition is determined to be warranted, the design concept and ultimately the plans for the replacement home /garage will be presented for approval. To present plans for a replacement home at this time would be presumptive and putting the "cart before the horse ". Mr. Busyn explained that in the evaluation of the home he provided to the Board he highlighted the damage, deterioration, safety and issues of non - compliance with the building code, which all address the section of the Plan of Treatment which would justify the demolition of a heritage resource in the district. Mr. Busyn added that since the Plan of Treatment was established for the district, he has worked on several homes in the neighborhood, each time with the goal of . being true to the historic integrity of the area. John McDonald, realtor for Mr. Busyn explained that he has had years of experience marketing homes in the Country Club District, and finds this home to be one of the most challenging. OTHER COMMENTS: Member Kojetin questioned if anyone has looked into the current "livability" of the house, pointing out there could be mitigating factors such as mold that could be documented supporting the request for a tear down. Member Ferrara agreed with Kojetin adding the Board should look at this request very carefully before a final decision is made. Ferrara pointed out the action taken this evening will be looked at and the Board will need documentation to back up our decision. Member Ferrara reiterated in her opinion the house could be remodeled. Board member discussion ensued regarding the recommended findings and 9 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board conditions. Members Forrest and Rehkamp Larson questioned whether it would be appropriate to include finding #4 which addressed the economic hardship to the owner of the property; pointing out that the design guidelines do not address financial hardship. The Board agreed that while they sympathized with Mrs. Ziegeweid's dilemma, the decision to permit the demolition of the home should stand on the status of the structures, not the owner's economic situation. Further discussion continued focusing on procedure with members in agreement that the requested COA is preliminary, not final, and the applicant will be required to return to the Board with final plans before a Certificate of Appropriateness is considered. Members Rehkamp Larson and Montgomery left the meeting. MOTION & VOTE: Member Blemaster moved to grant preliminary approval of the COA for demolition of the. house and garage at 4615 Wooddale Avenue subject to the recommended findings and conditions,, with the exception of item #4 which identifies an economic hardship, and also subject to all of the recommended conditions. Member Kojetin seconded the motion. Members Forrest,. Kojetin, Blemaster and Benson voted aye. Members Ferrara and Fukuda abstained. The motion carried. IV. 2008 MN HERITAGE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE REPORT: The annual Minnesota Historic Preservation Conference was held in Northfield, MN on Friday and Saturday, September 19th and 20th. As a Certified Local Government, it is mandatory that at least one member of Edina's HPB attend the conference. The theme for the conference centered on preserving a communities "Main Street ". Members Bob Kojetin and Arlene Forrest attended both days of the conference. Kojetin observed that Edina's 44th and France Commercial area would probably most closely represent Edina's historic commercial district. Member Forrest observed that she saw a correlation between the presentations on historic main streets with,Edina's more recent mixed use developments which are combining residential, commercial and office uses. Kojetin and Forrest agreed that the conference was time well spent, and encouraged the HPB to consider attending future conferences. Board members thanked both Bob and Arlene for representing them at the conference and agreed that attending future conferences should be on their "to do" lists. 10 Minutes — October 14, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board V. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT LIFT STATION: A Curious Find Consultant Vogel shared with Board Members photo's of "life beneath the manhole ". Vogel explained during Country Club District street reconstruction workers removed a manhole and found an old "lift station" dating from Thorpe's original development. Consultant Vogel said it was an unusual, but interesting find. The subterranean lift station, which was full of water, was drained, photographed, and then filled in with sand. Board members appreciated the documentation of the "find ", which will be added to the history of the district. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: None VII. CORRESPONDENCE: None IX. NEXT MEETING DATE: November 10, 2008 (MONDAY) X. ADJOURNMENT 9:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ,Joyce Repya & ,Jackie Hoogenakker 11