Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-01-20_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 20, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of January 6, 2009 III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of January 6, 2009, Work Session of January 6, 2009 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings, " the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure faimess to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. Agenda/Edina City Council January 20, 2009 t Page 2 A. PUBLIC HEARING ON APPEAL OF VARIANCE DENIAL - 5349 Kellogg Avenue - Resolution No. 2009 -13 (Favorable majority vote of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PRELIMINARY REZONING & AMENDMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - YMCA, 7355 York Avenue - Resolution No. 2009 -14 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT & APPEAL OF VARIANCE - Twin Cities Orthopedics, 4010 65 th Street West, Resolution No. 2009 -15 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) * D. CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 3. 2009 - PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL SITE PLAN - Aloft HotelMayzata Properties, 7701 Normandale Road III. PUBLIC COMMENT During "Public Comment," the City Council will invite comments from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on tonight's agenda. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was held by the Council within the last thirty days or a matter scheduled for a future hearing on a specific date. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. IV. AWARD OF BID A. 15 In -Squad Video Systems - Police Department B. Toro Groundsmaster 4500 -D Rotary Mower - Braemar Golf Course C. Edinborough Park Air Handling Replacement V. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. First Reading Ordinance No. 2009 -1 Amending Utility Rates (First Reading requires favorable majority of Council Members to approve, Waiver of Second Reading requires favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) B. Resolution No. 2009 -11 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) * C. Resolution No. 2009 -12 Calling Public Hearing for Vacation of a Portion of Bellmore Lane (02117/09) D. Set Volunteer Recognition Reception Date E. Set Annual Meeting Date rA Mon Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda/Edina City Council January 20, 2009 Page 3 F. Resolution No. 2009 -16 Approving Hennepin County Electronic . Proprietary Data Base (EPDB) Conditional Use License Agreement G. Gateway Development Agreement VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated January 8, 2009 TOTAL $674,439.63; and dated January 15, 2009 TOTAL $1,468,633.17. B. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009 -2013 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Jan 19 REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Jan 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jan 27 Town Hall Meeting 11:30 A.M. Feb 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Feb 16 PRESIDENT'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Feb 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Feb 24 Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. Mar 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mar 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mar 24 Study Session - To be determined 7:00 A.M. Apr 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Apr 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Apr 28 Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 6, 2009 7:00 P.M. OATHS OF OFFICE ADMINISTERED City Clerk Mangen administered the Oath of Office to Commissioners Mary Brindle and Ann Swenson and Chair James B. Hovland appointed to terms of four years to January 1, 2013. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 2008 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for December 16, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and, Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 6, 2009 7:15 P.M. OATH OF OFFICE Hennepin County Chief Judge Swenson administered the oath of office to Ann Swenson for the office of Council Member and HRA Commissioner. City Clerk Mangen administered the oaths of office to Mary Brindle for the office' of Council Member and HRA Commissioner, and James B. Hovland for the office of Mayor and HRA Commissioner. PRESENTATION Jim VanValkenberg, former Edina Mayor, displayed two gavels he used and had donated to the Historical Society and presented Mayor Hovland with a copy of the January, 1974, Edina Governmental Commission Report. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda with the exception of Item IV.P Reports /Recommendations, Set Hearing Date (January 20, 2009) Planning Items, as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. CMA SAVVY & SILVER CIRCLE AWARDS PRESENTATION TO EDINA COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT Mayor Hovland described the three CMA Savvy and Silver Circle Awards that were received by the Edina Communications and Marketing Department and congratulated all involved. *MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 2008, WORK SESSION OF DECEMBER 16, 2008, MEETING'WITH LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION OF DECEMBER 16, 2008, AND WORK SESSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 25, 2008 APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by.Member Swenson approving the Regular Meeting of December 16, 2008, Work Session of December 16, 2008, Meeting with Legislative Delegation of December 16, 2008, and Work Session Meeting of November 25, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 12009, ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NO. S- 101 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to continue public hearing on Public Improvement No. 5101 to February 3, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON PERMIT TO ALLOW OVER THREE PETS — RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -08 APPROVED, WAYNE CARLSON, 523 COVENTRY LANE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Deputy Chief Presentation Deputy Chief Long presented the request of Wayne Carlson and Rosie Horner, 523 Coventry Lane, to allow more than three dogs and one cat in one home. He advised the City became aware of the animals on November 17, 2008, when a call of complaint was received about the number of pets in the household and constant barking. The investigation found they had three dogs and one cat. Mr. Carlson had since applied for a pet permit to exceed -the Ordinance limit. Mr. Long advised Staff's concerns were the original complaint of constant barking by three dogs, impact to Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 6, 2009 neighboring quality of life, units sharing common walls, limited green space, and amount of animal waste. In December, notification of the application for this permit was sent to surrounding residents. Mr. Long stated to date, nine a -mails in opposition and two stating. no- objection had been received. He read the objections that were received and stated staff recommended the requested permit be denied based on the complaint received and objections of this multi - family neighborhood. Proponent Presentation Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Lane, stated they would like to have five pets, which they have owned for -nine years. He showed the Council pictures of his three dogs and cat and described the age and temperament of each. He advised of the certification, competition levels, and rally titles for each dog. All dogs train several times a week, compete monthly, and last year they spent $5,000 on trials, training, seminars, and massages following trials. Mr. Carlson stated his neighbors generally vacation five to six months a year, and the neighbor to the north spent two weekends each month at their cabin. Mr. Carlson noted a complaint indicated his dogs had jumped on people, but his dogs have had no contact with people in the garage for the last year. He stated his dogs were under control, leashed, licensed by Edina, of a toy variety, live indoors, weigh less than 50 pounds, a great asset to his health, and a credit to Edina because they perform well. He explained that the residents who complained' have no issues with his two cats, which were living at another premises, concluding he would like them back home. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Public Testimony Vicki Handler, 500 Indian Hill Road, Chanhassen, stated she was the daughter of Patricia & Seymour Handler, neighbors to the north who entered the complaint but were unable to attend the meeting. Ms. Handler stated she had provided a statement to the Council advising of her mother's position. She said her parents were in their 70's and acknowledged that under certain situations pets could have a calming effect on their owners; however, her parents had endured this disturbance for nine years and received no response or satisfaction from Mr. Carlson. Ms. Handler noted her parents have been wakened at 6:00 a.m. on Sundays because the dogs were trained. inside the shared garage located below their stairs. They have been personally accosted by the dogs, and have asked Mr. Carlson to call off the dogs. However, Mr. Carlson suggested her parents talk to the dogs and pet them. Mr. Carlson had also put up a volleyball net to protect the Handlers when entering the garage, but the net became entangled in the Handler's.car door. Ms. Handler explained that contrary to what was said, the dogs were not on a leash, and the condo association had specifically reprimanded Mr. Carlson for not having the dogs leased. There had also been feces in the garage. Ms. Handler stated her parents felt it was not appropriate to reward Mr. Carlson with two additional pets when he had been irresponsible with the three pets he already had, especially in a multifamily situation with common walls. She stated Mr. Carlson's dogs had caused considerable distress to her parents for a number of years. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council agreed this was an important but difficult decision because it was known that Mr. Carlson loved his pets. While the Council was sensitive to pet owners, it had to consider the larger issues of the City and believed that the ordinance established a reasonable number of pets. In addition, it was noted there were not extenuating circumstances since none of the dogs were needed as service animals. With regard to a time limit, Deputy Chief Long advised that the Animal Control Officer had suggested 30 days. The Council indicated this time limit would be reasonable. Member Bennett introduced Resolution No. 2009 -08, Denying Permit to Allow over Three_ Pets, Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Lane. Member Swenson seconded the motion Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 6, 2009 Motion carried. BOY SCOUT TROOP 123 RECOGNIZED Mayor Hovland recognized the attendance scouts from Boy Scout Troop 123, who were working on their Community Merit Badge. PUBLIC COMMENT Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia, stated he had been asked to comment on the upcoming Town Hall meeting, which he believed had not been publicized. He expressed concern that the meeting was scheduled to be held at 11:30 a.m. instead of later in the day when more residents could attend. He was also concerned the meeting was to be held in the Council Chambers because he felt it was not an informal "give- and - take" setting. Mr. Persha stated he hoped the Town Hall meeting would involve a casual setting and discourse, a time for questions, and opportunity for all to talk. The Council ,explained they intended to hold two Town Hall meetings in 2009. January 27th was the first Town Hall meeting to be scheduled. Following discussion, the Council had agreed to use the Council Chambers so the meeting could be televised for those who could not attend. As part of that conversation, it was agreed that a casual setting would be created with the Council seated at the same level as the residents. The meeting had been scheduled to start at 11:30 a.m. in response to requests from seniors who wanted it scheduled during daylight hours. Manager .Hughes advised that the Tuesday, January 27, 2009, Town Hall meeting had been advertised in the January issue of About Town, on the City's website, in the City Extra, and a press release would be issued this week to be included in the Sun Current on January 15. In addition, the meeting would be advertised on the City's electronic bulletin board the week before the meeting. MAYOR PRO TEM APPOINTED. Mayor Hovland explained there was a tradition to have seniority play a major roll in the Mayor Pro Tem selection and Member Housh, who had seniority, had been appointed Mayor Pro Tem for the last four years and had done an effective job. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to appoint Scot Housh as Mayor Pro Tem. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -01 APPROVED, ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State'Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced Resolution No. 2009 -01 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -02 APPROVED, DESIGNATION OF OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve Resolution No. 2009 -02, Designation of Official Newspaper. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -03 APPROVED, SIGNATORY RESOLUTION Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve Resolution No. 2009 -03, Signatory Resolution. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -04 APPROVED, DESIGNATION ` OF DIRECTOR/ALTERNATE DIRECTOR OF SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Motion made by Member Bennett and Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /January S. 2009 a seconded by Member Swenson to approve Resolution No. 2009 -04, Designation of Director /Alternate Director of Suburban Rate Authority. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -05 APPROVED, DESIGNATION OF DIRECTOR/ALTERNATE DIRECTOR OF LOGIS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve Resolution No. 2009 -05, Designation of Director /Alternate Director of Logis. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -06 APPROVED, FACSIMILE SIGNATURE RESOLUTION Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve Resolution No. 2009 -06, Facsimile Signature Resolution. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -07 APPROVED, DESIGNATING OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES Motion . made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve Resolution No. 2009 -07, Designating Official Depositories. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -10 APPROVED, APPOINTMENT TO EDINA FIRE RELIEF BOARD Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve Resolution No. 2009 -10, Appointment to Edina Fire Relief Board. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -09 APPROVED, PETITION FOR WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT City Engineer /Public Works Director Houle stated this petition was considered by the Council in October of 2008. He noted that Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Watershed District Administrator, and Jonathan Vlaming, Senior Manager of Planner with Three Rivers Park District, were in attendance to present potential projects, review the petitioning process and to answer questions of the Council. Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Administrator, explained that under consideration was a petition from Edina to undertake a feasibility study for one or several water quality improvement projects pertaining to Nine Mile Creek and water resources within Edina. He provided a formal presentation on the petitioning process to undertake capital projects, linked to Statute 103D.905, Subd. 3, that allowed the use of District -Wide Ad Valorem levy assessment. If initiated by a municipality, this levy allowed the project cost to be spread throughout the entire Watershed. District. Mr. Bigalke explained that to be considered, the projects must be identified in the District's Water Resource Management Plan. The District preferred to be petitioned by a city to ensure cooperation and success of the project. He described the District's policy for funding projects and land acquisition costs and presented the timeline a petitioned project would follow through acceptance of the petition, development of a feasibility report, holding of a public informational meeting, finalizing the engineer's report, DNR and BWSR 30 -day review, and public hearing on the project. Once ordered, the District would make necessary permit applications, acquire needed easements, finalize construction documents, bid and let the project, and construction would then begin. Mr. Bigalke presented pictures of projects completed within the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and described engineering techniques used for each. In response to the Council's inquiries, Mr. Bigalke advised there were one and one -half to two miles of stream in Edina, depending on the scope of the project since some segments may not need much restoration work. The Hopkins project cost $4 million, was petitioned for in May of 2006, and it could take a year to a year and one -half depending on public concerns, permitting issues, projects already underway, and funding ability since the District may need to accumulate several years of levy to accommodate a project. It was estimated that work on the Hopkins' project may begin as soon as this Spring, the portions requiring frozen ground would likely start the Fall of Page 4 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /January 6, 2009 2009, and with completion by January of 2010. In addition, there would be agreements to ensure proper vegetation growth. Mr. Bigalke advised the Hopkins project was to start this winter but due to permitting and wetland issues, it was pushed back, which allowed time for additional public input. Mr. Bigalke explained that once a petition was received, it became a Watershed District project so the Watershed's engineer would design the project and feasibility report, working closely with city staff to assure the project met the city's objectives for the project. He noted the Hopkins Council had petitioned for its project before the 2007 Plan was adopted They approved a resolution in support of the project so the Nine Mile Watershed Board of Managers had been assured of the Hopkin's support before moving forward. It was noted that the District would cover 100 percent of water - related expenses, 50 percent for trails alongside re- meandered streams, and 25 percent of land acquisition costs. In Hopkins, an effort was made to locate the trail as close as possible to the Creek for aesthetic and educational purposes. Mr. Bigalke explained that in Edina, the District does not have a position on the trail's proximity to the Creek and while a boardwalk could be considered in the wetland area, such a project may be cost prohibitive due to soils. Mr. Bigalke said the Board envisioned that the next project segment would be Edina's stream, balancing it with the water quality projects Bloomington had petitioned for prior . to adoption of the 2007 Plan. He added the District balances projects on a first -come first -served basis when the petitions were received and the District's Plan priorities. Mr. Bigalke concluded stating this was the first time the Watershed District had worked with the Three Rivers. Park District. The Council discussed whether portions of the trail could be constructed prior to stream bank restoration, the difficulty should alignment of the Creek necessitate relocation of the trail, and the cost benefit to use streambank equipment to lay the trail's foundation, which could be incorporated into the streambank project construction costs. This would also result in less disruption for residents and the wetland. The engineering feasibility would include aspects from the Three Rivers Park District. The Council reviewed the language contained in the Council's draft resolution and the Bike Edina Task Force resolution, noting the language contained in the Council's draft resolution was more vague and the Task Force's resolution indicated: "Nine Mile Creek Watershed District had budgeted funds for streambank stabilization, corridor management, and the construction of an off road multipurpose trail accompanying the Creek in their 2007 -2016 Capital Plan." Discussion ensued regarding the merits of both resolutions. Mr. Bigalke clarified that the Watershed District had identified funds for projects in its ten -year Watershed Plan, which allowed them to levy for project costs. However, the funds were not in hand. He pointed out that the Council's draft resolution was worded to allow consideration of a number of projects including lake restoration, storm water treatment and quality, not just Creek restoration projects. If the Watershed Board decided to accept Edina's petition, it would break the general resolution into two or three separate projects, which could be prioritized. Mr. Vlaming suggested that while the Bike Edina Task Force resolution was well intended, it was premature because the Park District was still in the process of determining the preferred alignment of the trail through Edina. He advised that Edina's trail project would be complex and significant portions would not be located adjacent to the Creek. Mr. Vlaming stated the eastern portion would be completed first and described a trail alignment from the Promenade, moving west. He stated the trail, no matter the alignment, would cross Highway 62 on a pedestrian bridge to connect to the High School campus, which would be an expensive proposition. Because of this, they were trying to get funding from the Federal stimulus package and a grant. If awarded a grant, they could not build the bridge until 2012. He advised that timing of Edina's trail would be consistent with what the Three Rivers Park District wanted to accomplish. - Based on Council inquiry, Mr. Vlaming described the project that was constructed as a package that Richfield brokered with the Met Council Environmental Services when they reconstructed the Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 6, 2009 t streets to include a regional trail, bike lanes, sidewalk, and beautification. He said the regional trail segment was constructed as a side path alongside but separated from the roadway. In response to the Council, Mr. Vlaming stated he does not know the number of driveways the trail would cross but would provide that information to staff. He said the trail ended at 75th and Xerxes but, later this month the Board would consider a trail segment from the York Avenue tunnel to Xerxes. Mr. Vlaming noted Three Rivers Park District would not want to construct the entire trail until the YMCA plans were known. He advised Three Rivers could work concurrently on more than 50 projects in a given year. Regarding timing of the Edina project, Mr. Vlaming explained if the preferred alignment was considered by the Edina Council in April of 2009, it could be budgeted into Three Rivers' 2010 Capital Improvement Program and would compete with other projects the Board was considering. He advised that if the City was insistent regarding a trail alignment, without rational justification, the Park District may elect not to construct the trail because it was not a preferred alignment for the Park District. It was noted that while Three Rivers Park District operated no facilities within Edina yet, Edina taxpayers paid about $3 million in taxes each year to support the Park District. The Council discussed whether the project timeframe in Edina could be accelerated noting, however, that it would be limited by the Watershed's limited staff and budget. Mr. Bigalke explained that due to other projects under consideration, they do not have the budget capacity to begin construction in Edina prior to 2011. He stated they have "not requested funding from the Federal stimulus package but it was a valid option to consider. The Council again discussed the language contained in the two resolutions with concern expressed that changing the language of the Council's draft resolution to be more trail specific could result in a lost opportunity to receive 100 percent funding for water quality projects. It was noted the priority should remain with the bike trail since residents had indicated recreational facilities, bike trails and pedestrian paths were important. The Council agreed with the priority of connecting to the Hopkins trail. Mr. Bigalke stated the Watershed District budget does not specifically spell out funding for off -road multiuse trails. However, since they could cost -share on park benches and kiosks, if petitioned they have the ability to include trails in the scope of their work. If not petitioned for, then the Three Rivers Park District could consider it. He suggested the resolution retain the initial, generic language indicating: "Petitioning for water quality projects within the City of Edina with preference being given to the following projects: streambank projects and trails; lake water quality projects; and, storm water utility projects. Then, if additional funds become available to address phosphorus levels in the lake, they could proceed in addition to developing plans for the bike trail. With the Task Force resolution language, an. additional petition would need to be submitted to the Watershed District to get a water quality improvement project. , The Council discussed amended resolution wording and agreed to: "water quality improvement projects in the City of Edina including but not limited to: streambed stabilization, off -road multipurpose trail accompanying the Creek to the extent possible, corridor management, lake water quality improvement. ". Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2009 -09 accepting petition for water quality improvement projects, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as amended. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *SET DATE FOR BOARD OF APPEALS AND EQUALIZATION Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to set the date for the Board of Appeals and Equalization on April 13, 2009, starting at 5:30 p.m. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 6, 2009 EDINA COMMUNITY CHANNEL 16 POLICES APPROVED Communications Director Bennerotte advised of the current programs being aired on Channel 16 and explained that at this point, staff believed it was appropriate to adopt formal policies and standards for editing and playback on its channel. She read the policies and standards being recommended for video production services. The Council discussed whether the term "broad' community appeal" should be defined. Communications Director Bennerotte recommended it be left to the discretion of department_ staff. It was suggested that the term "nonprofit organizations" reference the State and Federal definition to assure the organization had obtained that status. Communications Director Bennerotte stated this language links the website policy that does not formally define "nonprofit." The Council discussed definitions for "commercial intent" and how that related to segments when a restaurant or other business was featured, which may be considered promotion by its nature but it was not an outright advertisement. It was noted, however, that Edina had to compete for business and wanted to promote new business in town. Communications Director Bennerotte explained that staff was sensitive that as many people live in Edina as work here and due to the limited budget, they attempt to use a "broad brush" and allow flexibility in this area. She advised that a bigger concern was that the channel was becoming, increasingly popular and received more requests from residents and organizations to tape things free of charge. The Department does not have the resources to do that and wanted documentation to show priority of services and then offer services for a price when appropriate. Attorney Knutson advised this was not an ordinance consideration but general guidance, so "broad brush" language should work and discretion could be given to staff to make that decision. The Council discussed that this was a good starting point and if it needed refinement based on activity, the Council could consider it. The Council requested that in six months staff provide a list of organizations requesting services, those accepted and those declined to determine how the policy was working. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving Edina Community Channel 16 Policies. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. REAPPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES Mr. Hughes presented a list of people of who had responded with interest in being reappointed and qualified with respect to term limits and attendance requirements. He requested that the appointment to the Human Rights and Relations Commission be removed from consideration since it was a school appointment. He also noted the list of other vacancies that existed and suggested those appointments be considered later in the meeting. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving reappointment of members to Boards, Commissions and Committees as detailed in the, January 6, 2009, Staff Report/Recommendation. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RENEW COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC HEALTH City Sanitarian Engelman advised that Edina received grant money and partnered with the City of Bloomington for public health services and emergency preparedness. Karen Zeleznak, City of Bloomington Public Health Administrator, introduced staff members in attendance and stated she had also provided an overview of the 2007 Annual Report, 2008 response to Council's concerns, 2008 quarterly reports to include timely information, and Good Neighbor Tools that were distributed to the community to raise awareness of senior services and free services. She had also provided materials related to the community health assessment, summary of the on -line survey, Edina Youth Health Update, Maternal and Child Health Update, emergency preparedness newsletter, and update on influenza cases worldwide. Ms. Zeleznak outlined the duties of the Community Health Board required by Statute, planning requirements to Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 6, 2009 be completed within a five -year cycle, and responsibilities for use of State dollars to support six areas of public health responsibility. She read a list of services and programs provided by Bloomington Public Health to fulfill State requirements and described the community partnership they had developed to address issues that affect the health of Edina residents. Ms. Zeleznak advised of the planning and reporting requirements, 2008 highlights and planned activities for 2009. She then presented 2007 -2008 highlights of the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Plan and activities planned for 2009. She stated their total grant allocation was just over $51;000, and Edina would receive a little over $9,000 of that allocation. In response to the Council's inquiry, Ms. Zeleznak explained that while funding was removed for Pan Epidemic planning, it was expected to be done so Edina was being asked to cover some of that cost. She advised that they had not yet heard of State budget cuts in their funding, but changes could be made by the. Legislature or Governor. The Council expressed concern should this program not receive grant funds to finance the program. It was agreed that there may be impacts to the second half funding from the State and if that were to occur, Edina would enter into a discussion with Bloomington Public Health. When asked about the option of grants, Ms.. Zeleznak explained that while they have had notable success with grant writing, some of the major Federal grants were targeted and unique to fund core activities. She stated they actively look for grant dollars and would keep the Council informed should Legislative action occur resulting in unfunded mandates. The Council expressed appreciation for communities working together to benefit from each other's services. Mark Johnson, Community Health Committee Chair, stated he fully endorsed Bloomington Public Health, as does the entire Committee. He stated they bring professionalism to the process, were efficient and a pleasure to work with. Mr. Johnson pointed out that Richfield, Bloomington and Edina were each unique and face different issues, so it was a testament to Ms. Zeleznak's work that she could pull all of the issues together into one package. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving renewal of the Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington Public Health Division for $183,706 for calendar year 2009. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RENEW PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AGREEMENT WITH BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC HEALTH Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving renewal of the 2009 Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement with Bloomington Public Health for $41,665. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. HEARING DATES OF JANUARY 20, 2009, AND FEBRUARY 3, 2009, SET FOR PLANNING ITEMS Mr. Hughes stated he does not want one agenda to contain too many items and recommended moving the Aloft Hotel site plan to the February 3, 2009, meeting, which was agreeable to the applicant. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to set January 20, 2009, as the hearing date for: 1) Appeal of Variance Denial, 5349 Kellogg Avenue; 2) Preliminary Development Plan, Preliminary Rezoning and Amendment of Comprehensive Plan, YMCA, 7355 York Avenue; and, 3) Amend Final Development Plan, Twin Cities Orthopedics, 4010 65th Street West; and to set February 3, 2009, as hearing date for Final Site Plan Aloft Hotel/Wayzata Properties, 5701 Normandale Road. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 18, 2008, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $139,301.26; Communications Fund $7,513.92; Working Capital Fund $60,172.74; Art Center Page 8 'r Minutes /Edina City Council /January 6, 2009 Fund $2,431.69; Golf Dome Fund $246.34; Golf Course Fund $16,014.87; Ice Arena Fund $9,662.86; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $20,484.30; Liquor Fund $174,112.89; Utility Fund $67,436.18; Storm Sewer Fund $176.14; PSTF Agency Fund $4,007.99; TOTAL $501,561.18 and for approval of payment of claims dated December 25, 2008, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $192,214.49; CDBG Fund $16,929.74; Communications Fund $6,388.85; Working Capital Fund $355,474.99; Construction Fund $208,699.05; Art Center Fund $13,565.25; Golf Dome Fund $416.17; Aquatic Center Fund $37.28; Golf Course Fund $2,651.06; Ice Arena Fund $25,128.03; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $30,012.44; Liquor Fund $215,013.19; Utility Fund $192,784.46; Storm Sewer Fund $18,573.26; PSTF Agency Fund $18,417.76; TOTAL $1,296,306.02 and for approval of payment of claims dated January 1, 2009, and consisting of 24 pages: General Fund $302,390.07; Communications Fund $12,045.40; Working Capital Fund $134,260.24; Art Center Fund $8,737.35; Golf Dome Fund $2,510.31; Aquatic Center Fund $77.38; Golf Course Fund $8,663:74; Ice Arena Fund $2,654.27; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $12,725.52; Liquor Fund $149,746.86; Utility Fund $18,216.82; Storm Sewer Fund $10,970.48; PSTF Agency Fund $34.84; TOTAL $663,033.28. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS The Council discussed the process to fill Board and Commission vacancies. Concern was expressed that the mass public interview and scoring process used last year was uncomfortable for some of the candidates, did not protect their privacy, resulted in a "competition" for a volunteer appointment, did not provide a candid discussion of qualifications and did not take into account input from the Board or Commission Chairs on specific boards and commission needs to assure the appointments provided a balance of professions and skill sets. It was noted that in an effort to provide more "transparency," the interview process had evolved from when the Mayor and Board or Commission Chair interviewed candidates and made recommendations for the Council's endorsement. That process had provided an interaction and communication between the Board /Commission and the Council, which some believed was currently lacking. Member Bennett objected to reverting to the prior appointment process and stated it was important to remember that it was started in consideration of the League of Women Voter's study that included term limits. She felt it worked well and was helpful to interview candidates side -by= side, which provided transparency, synergy and made it clear how well a person worked with others. She suggested having that group interview would not preclude inclusion of the Board or Commission Chair who could attend the interview. It was agreed that term limits were designed to allow more participation by the community. The Council discussed methods that could be instituted whereby the Board or Commission Chair could take part in the interview, open deliberations, and scoring of applicants. Mayor Hovland noted the number of vacancies and overwhelming number of applicants. He stated he did not think the current method was effective in allowing adequate input from the Chair and clarified that the key. issue of the League of Women Voters had been with term limits, not the interview process. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to adopt the interview approach used prior to last year whereby the Council would be notified of the applicants so they could share comments with the Mayor or Chair, the Mayor would collaborate with the Board or Commission Chair on vacancies to coordinate interviews with the applicants, and the Mayor would make a recommendation for appointment that was voted on by the Council. Member Bennett stated again her objection to moving away from the process used last year for the first time, advising that some residents who had applied many times in the past did not make application tonight and she was sorry the City was losing their talent. Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays; Bennett Motion carried. Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 6. 2009 Mayor Hovland extended the City's condolences to the families of Louella Maetzold, Tom Mahler, Mark Holms, Otto Bang, Bill Greer, and Carl Pohlad, stating each had been an asset to Edina and would be greatly missed. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Page 10 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 6, 2009 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; John Keprios, Park & Recreation Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; Ann Kattreh, Edinborough Park Manager; Susie Miller, Edinborough Park Assistant Manager; Steve Grausem, Edina Liquor Stores Manager; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to continue the review of the City of Edina's Capital Improvement Plan and Business Plans for its enterprise facilities. Manager Hughes explained the facilities managers were in attendance to review their proposed Capital Improvement and Business Plans. He stated he believed the Council could finish with the enterprise facilities and possibly review the Utility Rate Study. The Council reviewed the Capital Improvement and Business Plans for: Edinborough Park the Edina Liquor Stores, and Edina Communications and Marketing. During the review each manager answered Council's questions regarding proposed improvements, 2008 facility operations, and long term facility challenges such as the Edinborough Park Trust Fund, costs of updating and replacing Park equipment, replacement of cable /audio operating equipment, and remodeling necessary to Edina's Liquor Stores. Marketing plans for 2009 were reviewed. The effect of the economy on the City's enterprises was noted. Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates, reviewed the utility rate study and the effects of various potential rate increases on future revenues and capital improvements. Discussion of commercial rates, Morningside water rates and the need for conservation policies took place. Staff will present a utility rate ordinance for consideration on the January 20, 2009, Council agenda. Edina Cable Coordinator, reviewed tips and issues for the continued effective broadcast of Edina Council meetings with the Council and staff. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk 1 To: Mayor & City Council From: Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Date: January 20, 2009 Subject:. An appeal of the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying application B- 08 -62, 5349 Kellogg Ave. So. for a .9 foot side yard setback variance and a 219 square foot lot coverage variance. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # II. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Zoning Board of Appeals heard and denied application B -06 -62 for 5349 Kellogg Ave. So. for a .9 foot side yard setback variance and a 219 square foot lot coverage variance. Info /Background: The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the applicant's variance request on December 18, 2009. The four member Zoning Board denied the variances on a split vote. The variances were moved for approval and seconded, however, two voted for and two members voted against the motion. The variances were denied due to lack of a voting majority. See attached meeting minutes, staff report and application. information. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-13 DENYING BUILDING COVERAGE AND SETBACK VARIANCES AT 5349 KELLOGG AVENUE City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Jon and Alyssa Hammar, 5349 Kellogg Avenue are requesting an appeal of the Zoning Board of Appeals denial of variances to add onto their home. The requested variances are as follows: 1. A .9 foot (10 inch) side yard setback variance. 2. A 219 square foot lot coverage variance. 1.02 The specific proposal is to add to the north side of the home on the main floor, to expand the kitchen, add a pantry and a new dinette area. 1.03 On December 18, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard the applicant's variance request. The four - member Board denied the variances on a split vote. The variances were moved for approval and seconded, however, two voted for and two members voted against the motion. The variances were denied due to a lack of voting majority. 1.04 On December 20, 2008, the property owners, Jon and Alyssa Hammar appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is no unique hardship relative to the property. The existing structures on the property already exceed the maximum allowable coverage requirement prior to adding the proposed spaces. 2. The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance because the building was designed and built slightly over current coverage requirements and has the benefit of more coverage than allowed by code. 3. The coverage proposed is not consistent with the goal of reducing building mass and coverage in existing established neighborhoods in Edina. 4. The variance would negatively impact the neighborhood by allowing more building area and less green space. 5. The variance runs counter to the intent of the ordinance to maintain consistent coverage limits within residential neighborhoods. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -13 Page Two Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina to uphold the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to deny the .9 foot, (10 inch), side yard setback variance and the 219 square foot lot coverage variance, based on the above findings. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on January 20, 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2009. City Clerk Zoning Board Minute Summary December 18, 2008 Members Present: Nelson, Winder, Risser, Grabiel B -08-62 Alyssa and Jon Hammar 5349 Kellogg Avenue, Edina Request: A.9 foot (10.8 inch) side yard "setback variance and a 219 square foot lot coverage variance Presentation by Planner Planner Aaker informed the Board the subject property is located on the east side of Kellogg Ave. consisting of a one and one -half story home with a detached two car garage. The home has an attached drive - through portico extending over the driveway south of the house. The homeowners are hoping to add to the north side of the home on the main floor to expand their kitchen, add a pantry and a new dinette area with a fireplace. The existing north wall of the home is slightly nonconforming; located 4.1 feet from the north lot line. The minimum required side yard setback is 5 feet. The property also currently exceeds the maximum allowable lot coverage for the property. The maximum coverage allowed for the lot is 2,250! square feet. The existing home, car port and garage cover 2,292 square feet, approximately 42 square feet over the allowed maximum. The proposed additions would increase the lot coverage of the property to 2,511 square feet, or 261 square feet over the maximum allowed. It should be noted that removal of the 176 square foot car port would still require an 85 square foot lot coverage variance to accommodate the plan. Planner Aaker explained staff supports the. continuation of the nonconforming north building wall at the slightly nonconforming setback provided. There appears to be no reasonable justification however, to allow over - building on the lot and allow coverage beyond that provided by ordinance. Planner Aaker stated staff recommends denial of the lot coverage variance request based on the following fndirigs. 1) There is no,unique hardship relative to the property caused by: a. The existing structures on the property already exceed the maximum allowable lot coverage requirement prior to adding the proposed spaces. b. The home was designed and built slightly over the current requirements and has had the benefit of more coverage than currently allowed by code. c. The addition will breach the effort to reduce building mass and coverage in existing neighborhoods in Edina. 2) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The variance could negatively impact the neighborhood by allowing more building area and less green space at a time when less mass and building area has become more desirable by residents and neighbors. b. The variance runs counter to the intent of the ordinance to maintain adequate yard area, especially in the smaller lot neighborhoods. Continuing, Planner Aaker added if the Zoning Board stipulates findings for approval then approval should be based on the following conditions: 1) The addition shall be constructed as per the submitted plan dated June 26, 2008. 2) This variance will expire on November 6, 2009, unless the city has issued a building permit for the project covered by this variance or approved a time extension. Mr. and Mrs. Hammar were present to respond to questions from the Zoning Board. Zoning Board Discussion Member Risser asked Planner Aaker about the allowed percentage of impervious surface pointing out it impacts water run -off. Planner Aaker agreed, adding when calculating lot coverage (all Edina,lots) sidewalks and driveways are not included and a 150 square foot credit is given to an unenclosed deck or patio. Continuing, Planner Aaker acknowledged that Edina does have a number of small "city" lots and the perception of "over building" on those smaller lots, especially in this neighborhood, has occurred. Planner Aaker noted Code was recently changed to address the "massing" issue; however, ..a floor area ratio (FAR) formula wasn't adopted. Lot coverage requirements continue to remain the same, but all plans are carefully reviewed by City staff to ensure that run -off doesn't become an issue. Member Nelson said he is aware of the "massing" issue and knows the City has carefiJlly studied it and implemented code changes. Member Nelson added he agrees with staffs suggestion that if the lot coverage variance is approved no building should be permitted above the car port. Continuing, Member Nelson said in his opinion if the roof line of the subject house is visually altered the home would appear more massive. Chair Grabiel asked for clarification on the lot coverage variance. Planner Aaker explained at this time,the. request is for a 219 square foot lot coverage variance, adding that presently the home; garage and carport are 42 square feet over on lot coverage, and if approved the overage on. lot coverage would be 261 square feet. The 42 square feet already exists, and isn't included in the variance request. Chair Grabiel questioned if this occurs often. Planner Aaker acknowledged that presently there are a number of lots in Edina that are over on lot coverage; however, residents seeking lot coverage variances have been very few. Historically lot coverage variances have not been supported by the Board. Public Comment Scott and Nancy Libby, 5341 Kellogg, told Board Members the Hammars have been very considerate with sharing their building plans, adding they are the most impacted neighbors and fully support the one -story addition. Applicant Comments Alyssa Hammar addressed the Board and explained their kitchen is very small and doesn't serve the needs of their family. Ms. Hammar pointed out their request is only for a small one -story "bump out" of their home, adding their request is small when compared with the larger homes that have been constructed or added onto on their block. Continuing, Ms. Hammar said in her opinion the carport as it exists today adds greatly to the character and symmetry of the home and eliminating the carport to reduce lot coverage would cause undue hardship. Ms. Hammar stated that in her opinion their plan meets the spirit and intent of the ,Code, reiterating their proposed addition is small in comparison with what has occurred around them. Concluding, Ms. Hammar stated the proposal as presented makes common sense, adding they are only trying to add a small addition onto their existing home, they aren't building above the carport, which they could, reiterating this is a small one -story addition to a home. Continuina Zonina Board Discussion Member Nelson asked Ms. Hammar if they looked at other design alternatives. Ms. Hammar responded they did, but there were no other options. Member Risser acknowledged that this is tough, adding she understands where Ms. Hammar is coming from. Ms. Risser acknowledged the proposed addition is small; however, if the Board moves in the direction of granting lot coverage variances there are ramifications. One being water run -off. Concluding, Member Risser pointed out the lot as it exists today is already over on lot coverage and if approved this will add to the existing non - conforminity. Member Nelson said he respects Member Risser's comments; however, common sense also plays a part in the decision process, adding he supports the project as presented. Member Winder told the Board she believes retaining the streetscape is also very important, and if the applicants were to build above the carport the stre.etscape would be changed. Member Winder stated she is wrestling with her decision, but agrees with Member Nelson that the plans presented are best. Member Risser asked Ms. Aaker if any neighbors expressed opposition to the plan. Ms. Aaker responded to date the City hasn't received any negative comments. Chair Grabiel pointed out the house /garage /carport are already over on lot coverage, and the proposed addition would further put the lot over on coverage, unless the car port is removed, adding he is having a hard time identifying a hardship. Chair Grabiel noted lot coverage variances are variances that Zoning Board's have been very hesitant in granting, especially since the City recently amended the Code to reduce massing. Member Nelson said in his opinion mandatory elimination of the carport isn't the best solution, and building over the car port isn't the right option either. Member Nelson stated he can support the variance as requested with the caveat that no building could occur over the carport. Member Risser asked Planner Aaker how frequently the Zoning Board has granted lot coverage variances. Planner Aaker responded Zoning Boards rarely approve lot coverage variances, adding lot coverage is something the City has always taken very seriously. Planner Aaker did note that Edina's Code is different from other city codes, adding some cities wouldn't include the carport as lot coverage. Chair Grabiel stated he agrees with staffs recommendations and can support the side yard setback variance, but not the lot coverage variance. A discussion ensued with all Board Members agreeing that the request is difficult and recognizing that it is also difficult to design an addition when the lot is already over on lot coverage.. Members did agree that removing the car port would change the streetscape, reiterating again the difficulty in reaching their decision. Board Action Member Nelson moved to recommend variance approval subject to the addition being constructed as per the submitted plan dated June 26, 2008, that no future building will occur over the carport area, and that the variance will expire on November 6, 2009, unless'the city has issued a building permit for the project covered by this variance or approved a time extension. Member Winder seconded the motion. Ayes; Nelson, Winder. Nays, Risser, Grabiel. Motion failed. Member Risser told the Board she sees the logic in approving this variance request; however, she respects staff's position and can't support the request as submitted. Member Risser reiterated she wrestled with this request, but in the end she supports staff. Alyssa Hammar 5349 Kellogg Avenue 'l Edina, MRI 55424 DEC 9 r 952 - 929 -2277 To Whom it May Concern: T`i , - 0 We would officially like to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board from the meeting dating December le, 2008 regarding case # B08 -62. Please contact us regarding the necessary steps. Sincerely Alyssa an Jon Hammar O City of Edina December 19, 2008 Alyssa and Jon Hammar 5349 Kellogg Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Re: B -08 -62 —A.9 foot (10.8 inch), side yard setback variance and a 219 square foot lot coverage variance Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hammar: In connection with your recent request for the above referenced variance, which was heard by the Edina Zoning Board on Thursday, December 18, 2008, may we advise you that same has been denied. If you wish to'appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than December 28, 2008. If you have further questions on this matter; please feel free to contact me at 952 - 826 -0465. Sincerely, P Jackie Hoogenakker Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals Pit City Mall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com FAX 952- 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 LOCATI ®101 MAP `M1 5200, SZ01 5230 5205 Lego /i Hlahllghtad Faab re 5200 Hausa Number labels 5208 5211 5216 Street Name tabals 5213 5212 5217 5220 24 City Umft 5217 5216 5221 SY24 Creeks 522! 5220 ? 'Lake Names SYJ7 5224 5228 5229 7 4 ! Lakes 5226 5272 5228 Parke 5241 5239 5276 5232 t 5353 p Parcels 5292 5245 5231 5740 5241 2.76 i 52.76 M 69RD 5T07 5301 5309 5301 5300 5301 S"D t 5309 5304 5305 5304 5305 5304 '5309 5309 5307 5308 5311 5308 5313 5312 5213 5318 5318 5312 i 5317 5316 5329 5324 5325 5316 ! ! J 5320 5331 5328 5231 5320 6325 5.724 5337 5332 5337 5324 24 5329 5328 5341 5336 53 5928 5339 5332 �SJ49 i 5348 5351 5237 53.7e 5351 5348 5357 5339 24 64iN5TW 5401 5400 5401 5400 Sol 5400 2 A 2/ 5403 5404 5405 5404 5409 5404 NO !4200 5409 5408 5409 5405 5409 5408 5404 6413 5412 $413 5492 5413 5412 /5412 5413 5417 5418 5417 5416 5417 5416 5617 5418 SSS 5497 5641 5421 5420 5421 5420 1 5421 5420 9421 sazo A 5425 5424 R 5424 n5 5425 5424 5425 5424 76 5425 5429 5428 5428 5429 5428 5429 5420 y� 5429 5479 5432 5473 5672 5439 5972 5433 5492 1509 450T 4509 4503 4501 5437 I we 5437 5436 5437 5436 5437 5436 5437 66TH St 07 pEWNDR t0 d500 4506 4504 45024500 5501 5500 5501 5500 5501 5500 5501 6500 5505 5504 5505 5504 5505 5501 5505- 5500 "of 5504 DA1[QR OLpenad w4TAb119•C�japp(CI�sG6mS 5509 5508 1509 SSOB o wan 5508 F. B -OB -62 Multiole Variances 3, _ I ; 'I PID: 183028;24430067 3349 Kellogg Ave Edina, PIN 55424 U-N! N! 21A ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORI Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Kris Aaker November 6, 2.008 B -08 -62 Assistant Planner Brief Description: A .9 foot, (10.8 inch), side yard setback variance and a 219 square foot lot coverage variance at 5349 Kellogg Ave. for Alyssa and Jon Hammar Recommended Action: Deny the lot coverage variance request. Introduction /Background The'subject property is located on the east side of Kellogg Ave. consisting of a one and one -half story home with a detached two car garage. The home has an attached drive - through portico extending over the driveway south of the house. The homeowners are hoping to add to the north side of the home on the main floor to expand their kitchen, add a pantry and a riew dinette area with a fireplace. The existing north wall of the home is slightly nonconforming; located 4.1 feet from the north lot line. The minimum required side yard setback is 5 feet. The property also currently exceeds the maximum allowable lot coverage for the property. The maximum coverage allowed for the lot is 2;25Q3squa�re_feet: The existing home, car port and garage cover,2;292'-sggpo feet; approximately 42 aquare�feet _over-the- allowedfmaximum. The proposed additions would increase the lot coverage of the property to 2,511 square feet, or 261 square feet over the maximum allowed. It should be noted that removal of the 176 square foot car port would still require an 85 square foot lot coverage variance to accommodate the plan. Staff supports the continuation of the nonconforming north building wall at the slightly nonconforming setback provided. There appears to be no reasonable justification however, to allow over = building on the lot and allow coverage beyond that provided by ordinance. Primary Issue 9 Is the requested variance justified? No. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F, of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would - cause undue hardship. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests: 9) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? No. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the Code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty in this instance is that the existing home was built larger in footprint than allowed by code. A rather significant lot coverage variance would still be necessary to accomplish the plan even with removal of the car port. The existing structure is already in excess of the coverage requirement. It is difficult to identify a specific or unique hardship to allow additional building coverage on the site. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the properly, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? No. The lot is consistent in size. shape, width and depth as compared with other near -by and surrounding properties and does not have unique topographical features or any other features that are strikingly different from other properties in the vicinity. There appears to be no unique circumstances tied to the property and relating to the lot coverage request. 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Yes. The proposed addition would exceed the maximum coverage requirements meant to balance structure area verses lot area. The variance would lend support to the current trend in public perception that recent tear - down /re- builds and home additions in Edina have become too tall, too large and occupy too much space on a lot. Lot coverage has been part of the "massing" issue that the Zoning Board, Planning Commission and City Council have expressed great concerns over. Residents, Council, Commission and Board members have stated that that they believe more and more projects are being over -built in relation to the lot size, especially within given neighborhoods. The South Harriet Park neighborhood in particular, (where the subject home is located), has been of heightened concern for many. Staff Recommendation Deny the lot coverage variance request. Denial is based on the following findings: 1) There is no unique hardship relative to the property caused by: a. The existing structures on the property already exceed the maximum allowable lot coverage requirement prior to adding the proposed spaces. b. The home was designed and built slightly over the current requirements and has had the benefit of more coverage than currently allowed by code. c. The addition will breach the effort to reduce building mass and coverage in existing neighborhoods in Edina. 2) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The variance could negatively impact the neighborhood by allowing more building area and less green space at a time when less mass and building area has become more desirable by residents and neighbors. b. The variance runs counter to the intent of the ordinance to maintain adequate yard area, especially in the smaller lot neighborhoods. If the Zoning Board stipulates findings for approval then approval should -be based on the following conditions: 1) The addition shall be constructed as per the submitted plan dated June 26, 2008. 2) This variance will expire on November. 6, 2009, unless the city has issued a building permit for the project covered by this variance or approved.a time extension. Surrounding Land Uses There are single family homes located on all sides of the subject property. Site Features The property area is 8,123 square feet and consists of a two story home with a detached garage. Planning Guide Plan Designation: R -1, single family residential Zoning: Residential VARIANCE APPLICATION CASE NUMBER DATE FEE PAID. City of Edina Planning Department * www.cityoftedina.com 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 * fax (952) 826- 0389 FEE: RES - $200.00 NON -RES - $400 APPLICANT: NAME: ia&A fi J l um Wn'tMAL (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: 59 C`� aW bb 4, L PRONE: q - c EMAIL: hNinmaiQ f0lf hAS& . Ar-+ PROPERTY OWNER: NAME: Ails(­,& (I'li TDPJ C7Yi ntn'l i (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: K-106b 81f—AhaP PRONE: CEa _V11- 44 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (written and electronic form): "You must provide a full legal description. If more space is needed, please use a separaie sheet Note: The County may not accept the resolution approving your project If the legal description does not match their records. This may delay your project PROPERTY ADDRESS: 52M tab ANE-ML PRESENT ZONING1S1Aeh+Ifd P.I.D.# EXPLANA ON OF REQUEST: KLML (Use reverse side or additional pages If necessary) ARCHITECT: NAME: Iwim lf„ mr Z1,61s PHONE: � %� • - E L�� Effiqfl: 14A J 0 SURVEYOR: NAME: 51 MY i ki6 PHONE: ��� • 4� " J r EjWL: C; wp 44 1A . In tnr,C t� MA Gads Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The ProDosed Variance will: YES Relieve an undue hardship which was not self - imposed or a mere inconvenience: Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property In than vicinity or zoning district. Preserve a substantial property right �( possessed by other property in the vicinity u and zoning district Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property In the vicinity or zoning district. NO FNI X X N APPLICANT'S STATEMENT This application should be processed in my name, and I am the party whom the City should contact about this application. By signing this application, I certify that all fees, charges, utility bills, taxes, special assessments and other debts or obligations due to the City by me or for this property have been paid. I further certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other. City approvals that have been granted to me for any matter. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and, to the best of my knowledge, the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. Applicant's Slture ®ate OWNER'S STATEMENT I am the fee title owner of the above described property, and I agree to this application. (If a corporation or partnership is the fee title holder, attach a resolution authorizing this application on behalf of the board of directors or partnership.) Owner's Signat re Date Note. Both signatures are required (if the owner is different than.the applicant) before we can process the application, otherwise it is considered incomplete. We are applying for a variance due to a hardship related to our current kitchen. Our home has three distinct features that prevent us from enlarging our kitchen without extending out the back of the home. 1. There is an attached portico which serves only as a decorative feature of the home and cannot be used as living, storage or other similar space. This space is used in the calculation for hardcover/building coverage and is the reason we are over the allotted square footage. There are no other homes in this neighborhood with a portico. 2. The kitchen cannot expand into the interior of the home as it is landlocked by the basement staircase that runs the entire length of the kitchen. 3. The master bedroom is located on the main floor. Accordingly, it takes up significant space which in other homes in our neighborhood is utilized as additional kitchen space. These are all issues that were present with the home when we purchased it in 2001. We believe that these architectural features/challenges are exclusive to our home in this particular neighborhood. We are therefore respectfully requesting your consideration of this variance. We will describe these three issues in further detail below. 1. We purchased the home in 2001 from a single woman who had lived in the home for 30+ years. She undertook a remodeling project in the 90's to the exterior of the home. Specifically, she removed the entire roof, (which was a mansuered flat roof) and replaced it with an architecturally stunning roofline that is reminiscent of a French Country home. As part of this renovation, she incorporated a portico over the driveway. It is a simple portico with two columns supporting it and is directly situated over the driveway. It serves only as a decorative feature of the home and cannot be used as living, storage or other similar space. It is the equivalent of an overhang on the side of our home. When we renovated in 2003 -04 we added a second story to add bedrooms for our children. Rather than tearing off the roof that was added by the prior owner, we instead chose to save the front facade of the roof and the adjacent portico. We felt that adding a significantly larger roof line would be out of character with the neighborhood and therefore detrimental to the wishes of our neighbors and the home values in the neighborhood. We strongly feel that this portico enhances the aesthetics of the home and thereby enhances its value and the value of the surrounding homes. Removing this portico to create the needed hard cover space to complete the kitchen expansion would be detrimental to the value of both our home and the neighboring homes. Considering this portico is purely decorative and serves no purposeful living space, we respectfully request a variance to its inclusion in the calculation of hardcover space for our property. 2. Our kitchen is best described as a galley kitchen. It is approximately 9 x 15. It does not contain enough room for a dining table. We now find that as our children have grown (ages 5, 7 and 9) we are simply out of room for all 5 of us to eat at the same time in our current kitchen. The kitchen cannot be expanded further into the interior of the home as the staircase and only access point to the basement runs the entire length of the interior wall behind the kitchen, which effectively blocks any expansion towards the interior of the home. I The prior owner of the home had a master bedroom on the main floor. The majority of homes in this neighborhood are two story homes with all the bedrooms situated on the second floor. Having a master bedroom on the main floor uses up a substantial amount of square footage that typically would have been used for a kitchen/dining area. The current kitchen may have worked well for the prior single owner occupant. However, it is a significant hardship for a growing family of 5. The Kellogg neighborhood is almost exclusively young families. The current layout of the home is therefore out of character with the neighboring homes. Based on the fact that our home has several architectural features that are not found on any other home in our neighborhood that prevent us from configuring the home to provide space for our family, we request that you allow this variance. Second Variance Request: The backdoor of our home opens up over a concrete slab with a step down to ground level. This concrete slab is situated directly over the basement so it is within the current foundation/footprint of the home. This area of the basement is where the old water well was drilled. When the well was in service it appears it was run through center of the slab. We had the well formally sealed and all piping removed when we purchased the home. There is a full 8 foot basement foundation underneath this area and is currently utilized for a second refrigerator. There is a portion of our current kitchen that runs parallel to this slab. We understand from the survey that this portion of the kitchen is a non - conforming encroachment on the neighboring property lot line. We wish to close off the current backdoor and enclose this slab /step down with kitchen space. The area of the slab is 4.5 ft x 6 ft. This additional space would also be outside of the setback to the neighboring property line. This back step is elevated and looks directly into our neighbor's living room creating a privacy issue for them. This door is a high traffic entrance to our home. We feel our neighbors would greatly appreciate closing off and eliminating this high traffic intrusion into their living room. We therefore are respectfully requesting a variance to the set back to include the additional structure over the back slab /step. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Scott [srlibbey @msn.com] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 11:46 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: 'Nancy'; ahammar @comcast.net Subject: Support for Case File: B -08 -62 - Alyssa & Jon Hammar November 1, 2008 RE: Case File B -08 -62 Alyssa & Jon Hammar 5349 Kellogg Ave, Edina Lot 12, Block 5, South Harriet Park Dear Edina City Hall Planning Department (c /o ihoo�enakker(�ci.edina.mn.us ), As owners of the house directly next to 5349 Kellogg (and likely in closest proximity to the proposed variance), we fully support the variance requests in Case File B- 08 -62. ,Please let us know if you prefer additional information. Sincerely, Scott & Nancy Libbey 5341 Kellogg Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 (952) 922 -8993 nlibbev @msn.com srlibbev(@msn.com o(,Lo m-,i o0 ���5 } nL(Lded v,Q- o 4-r orn --::�> p d D M-i - a�� h�►� ►� Sew, f S _ 6� �s t,��r�c � t s ��w�tr b�-,� ►�, Y y i ✓ .v4�� *� ��t' t, S i �. .�y �.� .,1 ' . +sue• '! `n `� ia►:1 � 7' F • �.�• � �.'. , � s.. .+' y .fyi••y of •rd ,•��� M ~��"+y.•' w� 1p i••� -`+ •'" 1,.•_� r •x R •�! / � _ ~ ` mss' � '..� �� �� C• -•--•- _ I f ..'"'fir ... '�.. ,.. 1� i �' •c.owr AMt >_ n Jackie Hoosgenakker From: Fergesen@aol.com Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 8:04 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: ahammar @comcast.net Subject: Zoning Changes Re: Alyssa & Jon Hammar's Variance As direct neighbors of Alyssa and Jon Hammar we are not opposed to the proposed setback variance of 10.8 inches on their side yard or the 261 square foot lot coverage variance. We have been in the neighborhood for over 10 years and have no issues with the proposed changes due to their kitchen remodel. Sincerely, Nancy and Rick Fergesen Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel Deals! 10/30/2008 I rn P/lAi \SI TWIT) AFT U5U47y l ,...,V.. ., IAD VANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 7 CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone ( ) 474 7964 Fax (952) SURVEY FOR: ANDERSON WOODCRAFT SURVEYED: September 25, 2008 DRAFTED: September 26, 2008 REVISED: October 9, 2008, to show proposed addition. REVISED: October 20, 2008, to show building coverage. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 12, Block 5, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the corners of the property. 4. Showing elevations to show the topography of the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the map when determining other elevations for use on this site. 5. Showing and tabulating building coverage and area of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over building coverage requirements. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS "0" Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Surveyor under the �E& laws the State of Minnesota. ame HParker °P P.�SNo 9235 EXISTING BUILDING - COVERAGE House 1,614 Sq. Ft Garage 502 Sq. Ft Carport 176 Sq. Ft X898.2 898.2 X w D W Q 89X !^ O 1 Ld Y BENCHMARK: TOP OF MANHOLE 898.0 G /Lf f1 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE, 2,292 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 8,123 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF BUILDING COVERAGE 28.2% PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE House 1,614 Sq. Ft. Garage 502 Sq. Ft. Carport 176 Sq. Ft. Proposed Addition 219 Sq. Ft. TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 2,511 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 8,123 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 30.996 <Z� f �� 900.8 rni kin reT �. r vUlvu t.im I � 900s EXISTING HOUSE FLOOR 903.6 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE CAP #15230 DWG. NO. 080459 I ow— aim I KITCHEN REMODEL / ADDITIOE a — 0, i k _I OrL.." To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director REYUR`l%REC:UMMEN VAhlUN Agenda Item II.B Consent F1 Planning Commission Recommended. Action: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes. Inf ormation/Background: See attached Planning Commission report, minutes and development plans. Information Only Date: January 20, 2008 Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA "71 To Council Subject: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Action ® Motion Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for ® Resolution redevelopment of the YMCA site at 7355 York Avenue Ordinance Discussion Planning Commission Recommended. Action: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes. Inf ormation/Background: See attached Planning Commission report, minutes and development plans. RESOLUTION NO. 2008-16 UTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE YMCA SITE AT 7355 YORK AVENUE City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 CresaPartners on behalf of the YMCA is requesting a redevelopment of 7355 York Avenue to tear down and build a new YMCA facility and a four -story 130 -unit apartment building. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi- Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Overall Development Plan for the following described property: Lot 1, Block 4, YORKTOWN, Hennepin County Minnesota. Approval is subject to the following conditions, which would also be required at the time of final development plan: City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-16 Page 2 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 29, 2008 & December 5, 2008. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages All of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. 4. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of. the fire marshal. 6. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be paved and meet all minimum requirements of the city engineer. 7. The temporary parking lot shall be reviewed by the City Park Board during the Final Development Plan process. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at their cost. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. 9. The design must be modified to address York Avenue, to meet the spirit of the ordinance which encourages a project to create a more active pedestrian involvement with the street. Adopted by the Edina City Council this _ day of , 2009. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2009-16 Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF. HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 1 Ok Pi t4 HO � �O B • lN�APOMTV� 1000 City Of Edina RESOLUTION NO. 2009-14 RESOLUTION APPROVING A GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM QUASI- PUBLIC TO MIXED USE FOR THE YMCA AT7355 YORK AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 , CresaPartners on behalf of the YMCA is requesting a redevelopment of 7355 York Avenue to tear down and build a new YMCA facility and a four -story 130 -unit apartment building. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi- Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Section 3. APPROVAL 3.01 The guide plan amendment of the following described property is approved: Lot 1, Block 4, YORKTOWN, Hennepin County Minnesota. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Adopted by the Edina City Council this 20th day of January, 2009. Attest: Debra A. Mangers, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 2009. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk PC 12/30/2008 Draft Meeting Minute Summary MEMBERS PRESENT: Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Grabiel, Forrest, Schnettler, Lonsbury MEMBER ABSENT: Brown 2008.0012.08 Overall Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning YMCA 7355 York Avenue South,: Edina Presentation by Planner Planner Teague reminded the Commission that this item was tabled at the October 1, 2008 Planning Commission meeting, in order for the applicant to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission. Planner Teague reported that among the issues raised, were concerns regarding the site plan, adding the applicant has submitted revised plans to attemptto address those issues to included the elimination of the, parking stalls along Xerxes Avenue, which previously required a setback variance, a revised landscape plan to address the streetscape issue in frontof the building, and the addition of green space in the rear parking lot. Planner Teague noted an additional concern was raised in regard to police calls generated,from the townhomes to the south. The police department has provided a listing of all calls received since 2002. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi - Public to Mixed Use, and Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD -5.) Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall /Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit & Variances. Approval is subject to the,following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi - Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 29, X008 & December 5, 2008. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A11 of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. 4. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 6. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be paved and meet all minimum requirements of the city engineer. 7. The temporary parking lot shall be reviewed by the City Park Board during the Final Development Plan process. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at their cost. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. Appearing for the Applicant Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, Greg Fenton, BWB, Rachel Robinson, `CommonBond Communities, Steve Korngable, MS Society Applicant Presentation Mr. Dorgan addressed the Commission and stated YMCA is very excited about this proposal and has met with neighbors. Mr. Dorgan introduced, Greg Fenton, BWB Architects to give a brief overview of the project. Mr. Fenton gave a brief presentation explaining that the slightly larger YMCA foutprint actually affords muie progtain space with flexibility. Mi. Fenton explained the new building is located on the front of the site to allow the current facility to continue to remain open during construction. The close proximity to York Avenue also gives the building a more urban feel while enhancing the 2 pedestrian experience along York Avenue. Mr. Fenton pointed out the new Y has also been designed with a lot of windows to bring in more light and help reduce building mass. The point of entry is on the east elevation and visitors from the sidewalk along York Avenue won't have to pass through a parking lot, as they do now to gain access to.the building. Concluding, Mr. Fenton said it is critical for the operation that the YMCA provides a single access point. This is very important for security reasons. Rachel Robinson addressed the Commission and reported CommonBond owns and manages South Haven, Yorktown Townhomes and Summit Point, all residences in Edina and for this project has partnered with the MS Society. Ms. Robinson added that all people with disabilities, and the general public, not only those with MS are welcome. Continuing, Ms. Robinson said all units will be designed and built with Universal Design principles with one, two, and three bedroom. units, 80% affordable and 20% market rate. Commission Comments & Questions Commissioner Grabiel questioned if the'proposal as presented would impact the neighboring skate park. Planner Teague responded that there would be temporary parking over park property and when the project is completed the park would return to its original state. Commissioner Staunton asked what this parcel of land is guided for under the new Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague responded that the site is guided for Quasi - Public, and no other changes. Commissioners also raised the following questions with regard to the housing element of the project: • 'Are 50% of the units mandated for those with disabilities and who sets the ratio • Are buildings constructed with "Universal Design principles" attractive to the general public • How are the units earmarked for those with disabilities? Is it on a first come first served basis? • Referring to Edina Police reports how would CommonBond address crime - related issues. In response to Commission questions and comments Ms. Robinson explained that CommonBond abides by the Fair Housing Laws and the goal of CommonBond is to have at least 50% of the units rented to individuals or families with disabilities. Ms. Robinson added CommonBond is not limited to renting 50% of the units to people with disabilities, it can be higher. Continuing, Ms. Robinson said that Universal Designed buildings greatly appeal to the general public because of the open floor plans. With regard to those with disabilities 3 those units would also be accessible units and there is an application process (for all) that includes income verification, credit history, rental history, and criminal background checks. Concluding, Ms. Robinson responded that CommonBond has a very good relationship with the Edina Police Department and is proactive in ensuring that its residents live in a safe and secure environment. Ms. Robinson reported all CommonBond properties have full time managers and reiterated all residents are screened. Ms. Robinson said if there is a problem with any of the residents we get the "wrong" ones out. Concluding, Ms. Robinson stated the building would feature a security system including security cameras and entry code pads. Public Comment Chair Lonsbury re- opened the public hearing. Dan Adkins, 7430 Xerxes Avenue, questioned where the apartment residents would park, especially for quick stops at home. Mr. Adkins stated he hopes if parking isn't adequate that over -flow parking doesn't spill onto Xerxes Avenue. Mr. Adkins suggested that security cameras be located in the parking ramp area. Concluding, Mr. Adkins reiterated his concern is with possible parking on Xerxes Avenue and the potential for increased traffic on Xerxes Avenue. Nina Holiday- Lynch, 4360 Brookside Court, addressed the Commission and told them she completely supports the project, adding it is very important for a community to provide affordable housing. Ms. Holiday -Lynch pointed out the proposed apartment is in the best possible location because of its close proximity to mass transit lines and' places of employment. Mr. Olson, 7457 York Avenue, told the Commission living in the Yorkdale Townhomes has been a blessing for him and his family. He explained living in affordable housing so close to mass transit, and places to work for him and his partner (Target and Macy's) have allowed him to finish school. Mr. Olson said he feels very safe living in Edina and his kids feel safe. Concluding, Mr. Olson asked the Commission to support the project as presented. Tim Brausen, representing Isaiah, an ecumenical organization, stated he believes this is a great opportunity for Edina to provide affordable housing. He stressed the location is ideal. Continuing, Mr. Brausen said his experience with CommonBond has been positive, adding CommonBond is an organization that provides great, well built, and well managed buildings providing affordable housing throughout the City and State. Steve Korngable, IVIS Society, told the Commission the MS Societ-y as an excellent relationship with CommonBond. At present over 200 people with MS are on a waiting list for a good safe place to live. Mr. Korngable said for those with MS the waiting list for an accessible home is two years. Concluding, Mr. 4 Korngable asked the Commission to approve this request, adding how important it is for those with MS to have easy access to water exercises, and other forms of exercise. Mr. Dennis Guiney, 5924 Olinger Blvd., stated he has been an Edina resident since 1972 and believes there is great value in living in Edina, adding it's a wonderful place to live and raise a family. Mr. Guiney said he would be very proud of Edina if this project were approved. It's a great opportunity to provide others the opportunity to live in Edina. Concluding, Mr. Guiney asked the Commission to approve the proposal as presented. Continued Commission Discussion Commissioners raised the following issues with regard to the YMCA building: • Parking • "No front door" on York Avenue to access the new YMCA building • Secured access point and interior circulation of the YMCA building • Setback hardship Commissioners clarified that there are 130 enclosed parking spaces (housing) and 435 surface parking spaces. Planner Teague indicated the YMCA has agreed to enter into a Proof of Parking agreement to construct an additional parking deck if the need arose. A discussion continued with regard to how the new YMCA addresses York Avenue. Commissioners felt more could be done to create a more pedestrian friendly exposure to York Avenue. It was pointed out that the height "cap" east of York Avenue does create some design challenges; however, creating a pedestrian friendly atmosphere is important and a goal identified by the City. Discussion also focused on the variances needed for the preliminary development plan and hardship with Commissioners acknowledging that the YMCA remaining open could be viewed as a self imposed hardship; however, the YMCA is a community resource that is unique in itself. Discussion also focused on if the MDD -5 zoning designation is right for this project; however, it was acknowledged that the present R -1 zoning of the site and the present use of the site as a community based resource is difficult to address and find the right formula, it's so unique. The setback requirements for the MDD -5 district also poise a problem for the site, acknowledging MDD -5 requires a smaller tract, greater setbacks, versus MDD -6 with lesser setbacks and larger tract. It was also pointed out that rezoning the site to a PCD -3 zoning classification would open up the project for retail. Discussion continued on splitting the motion to better address each request. Chair Lonsbury clarified that this request will be heard again by the Commission, 5 adding both preliminary rezoning and preliminary development plan approval require another hearing before the Commission. Chair Lonsbury also noted the requested variances also require a hearing before the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals at one of their regularly scheduled meetings. Commission Action Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi - public to Mixed Use, and Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD -5.) Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall /Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit & Variances. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi - Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 29, 2008 & December 5, 2008. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages All of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. All traffic mitigatioln measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be paved and meet all minimum requirements of the city engineer. The temporary parking lot shall e reviewed by the City Park Board during the Final Development Plan process. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at their cost. 0 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion Commissioner Grabiel pointed out that the City has gone to great lengths in requiring past applicants proposing housing developments to provide affordable housing units in their projects. Commissioner Grabiel pointed out this project offers affordable housing which should be positively viewed and which is something the City has encouraged in the past. Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Preliminary Development n Plan Approval including variances based o staff findings and, subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Risser seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder offered an amendment to the motion'suggesting that the building design be modified to address York Avenue to meet the spirit of the ordinance that encourages a project to create a more active pedestrian involvement. Commissioners Grabiel and Risser accepted Commissioner Schroeder's amendment. Commissioner Scherer strongly encouraged the applicant to modify their design to better address the buildings access point by making it more visible to pedestrians. Commissioner Grabiel pointed out that the entrance to the proposed YMCA building is roughly the same distance from the sidewalk as visitors' experience today. Commissioner Grabiel also pointed out with regard to the requested variances that the City recently granted variances for a housing and commercial development along 69th and,York/Xerxes. Member Fischer commented that it was mentioned that the YMCA remaining open could be considered`a self imposed hardship; however, in a sense the YMCA should remain open because it's an area resource which is the reason for the present R -1 zoning designation. Commissioner Fischer pointed out the uniqueness of the R -1 zoning for this site, adding the R -1 zoning of the site could be viewed as a hardship. Continuing, Commissioner Fischer said the 50' setback required could be considered out of scope and scale compared with MDD -6 zoning district. Concluding, Member Fischer also said in looking at all the details it's easy to forget that this is conceptually a good project. Chair Lonsbury called or the vote. All Commissioners voted aye. Motion carried. VA ow e Cn .sy a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague December 30, 2008 2008 - 012.08 Director of Planning INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Brief Description Redevelopment of the YMCA site at 7355 York Avenue to tear down the existing YMCA building, and re -build a new YMCA, and a four -story apartment. (See project location on pages Al —A3.) This item was tabled at the October 1, 2008 Planning Commission meeting, in order for the applicant to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission. The applicant has submitted a letter to specifically address those issues. (See letter on pages Al2a— Al2g.) (See minutes on pages Al02— Al09.) Among the issues raised, were concerns regarding the site plan. The applicant has submitted revised plans to attempt to address those issues. (See pages Al2h— A121.) The previous staff report has been revised below to reflect site plan changes, which include the following: The elimination of the parking stalls along Xerxes Avenue, which previously required a setback variance. A revised landscape plan to address the streetscape issue in front of the building. Addition of green space in the rear parking lot. (See pages Al2o— Al2p.) An additional concern was raised in regard to police calls generated from the townhomes to the south. The police department has provided a listing of all calls received since 2002 on page A52a. round The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing 70,000 square foot YMCA and build a new 73,000 square foot YMCA, a two -level parking ramp, and a four - story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The development would occur in two phases. The first phase would be the construction of a new YMCA builidng in the front parking lot, while the existing YMCA remained open. Existing parking behind the existing YMCA would be used, and temporary parking is proposed on the City park site to the north. Once the new structure is completed, the existing building would be demolished, and the parking ramp constructed. The second phase would be the construction of the apartment building.- (See narrative and plans on pages A4 —A46, and the attached development plans.) Half of the proposed housing units would be allocated for people with physical disabilities including multiple sclerosis. The units would be primarily affordable housing units. (See the applicant's specific breakdowns of the proposed housing on page A10.) The applicant had originally proposed an eight -story apartment building, however, revised the plans based on the recent zoning ordinance amendment in the planned commercial zoning district and Comprehensive Plan designation, that requires no more than four - stories east of York Avenue. The proposed MDD- 5 zoning district does not have a maximum height requirement. The proposal before the Planning Commission is a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Ultimately, the proposal would require all of the following: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi - Public to Mixed Use. The Mixed -Use designation would all the residential use. 2. A Rezoning from R -1, Single - Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD -5.) 3. Variances. (To be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals, if the Council approves the Preliminary Development Plan, Preliminary Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment.): a. A 5 -foot front yard building setback variance from 50 to 45 for the YMCA. b. Building setback variances of 15, 27, and 30 feet from the required 50 -foot setback to 35, 23, and 20 feet. (See variances on page A27a.) 4. A Conditional Use Permit for a private recreational facility. 5. An Overall /Final Development Plan. In order to obtain the above - mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step process. That process is as follows: 2 Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. Because of the Comprehensive Plan approval necessary, this application requires a four -fifths vote of the City Council. 2. Conditional Use Permit Overall & Final Development Plan, Variances and Final Rezoning. The Overall & Final Development Plan process is generally the same as the Preliminary Development Plan. However, a three -fifths favorable vote of the City Council is required.. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Yorktown Park and Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit district and guided park. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Yorkdale townhomes and single - family homes; zoned and guided low & medium density housing. Westerly: 7500 York Senior Housing; zoned and guided high density housing. Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.94 acres in size and contains a 70,000 square foot YMCA facility. (See page A2.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Density Quasi - Public R -1, Single- Dwelling District The proposed density of 22 units per acre would meet the city's code requirement for density in the Mixed -Use District; and is consistent with densities of existing apartment buildings in the area. (See attached map locating multi -unit developments in the area on page A46a.) Below is a density comparison of condominiums and apartments in the area: Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 3 (W York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 .15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 Yorkdale Townhomes 7429 York 90 9 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 312 28 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 Proposed New Apts. 7355 York 130 22 Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A53. A more detailed review would be done as part of the Final Development Plan review. Should a Final Development Plan be approved by the City Council, a developer's agreement would be required for public utilities. Parking The parking for a mixed development district is based on the square footage of the buildings. Based on the parking standards for a mixed development district, the project must contain 550 parking spaces, including 130 enclosed spaces for the residential units. The applicant is proposing to build a total of 435 spaces, including 130 enclosed spaces for the housing units. The applicant believes there would be enough parking spaces to meet their needs. (See comparison of YMCA facilities on page A7 of the applicant's narrative.) The traffic study concluded that 326 spaces would provide enough parking for this site. (See page A95 of the traffic study.) Rather than requesting a variance from the parking standard, the applicant has agreed to build the required parking if necessary for the project, and has submitted a proof -of- parking plan that they would agree to build if the City of Edina were to determine that they are not providing enough parking. With the proof of parking plan 544 spaces would be provided. (See page The applicant has revised the landscape plan to increase green space and trees to help screen the ramp. (See pages A121 and Al 2o.) 4 .I- Temporary Parking Lot The applicant is proposing a temporary parking lot on the city park site to the north. This would be constructed prior to the start of construction of the new YMCA. This would be necessary, as the new YMCA would be built in the existing front parking lot. The area of the park where the lot would go is not programmed with any City of Edina park functions. The YMCA only uses this area. Should the City Council approve the preliminary plans, this item would be brought before the City Park Board. The temporary parking lot would be built with bituminous paving with controlled run -off. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at their cost. YMCA Access Two access points are proposed to the site off York Avenue, similar to the existing conditions. The main building entrance to the YMCA would face Xerxes Avenue, but would actually be closer to York Avenue than the existing YMCA entrance, which faces York Avenue. Staff had recommended that a front door access be provided along York for the pedestrian users of the facility. However, for security reasons, the YMCA would like to limit access in and out of the building to one place. The internal layout of the facility would not be conducive to a second entrance. For the security reasons, and the fact that the front door would actually be closer to York Avenue than the current facility and that pedestrians do not have to cross through a parking lot to the front door would be an improved circumstance. 5 Compliance Table * Requires a Variance City Standard (MDD -5) Proposed Housing — Setbacks Front Setback — York Avenue 50 feet 35 feet* Xerxes Avenue 50 feet 23 feet* Side — South 50 feet 20 feet* Side — North 50 feet 300+ feet YMCA - Setbacks Front Setback — York Avenue 50 feet 45 feet* Xerxes Avenue 50 feet 200+ feet Side — South 50 feet 100+ feet Side — North 50 feet 65 feet Parking Structure Front Setback — York Avenue 20 200+ feet Xerxes Avenue 20 47 feet Side — South 20 100+ feet Side — North 20 86 feet Building Height No maximum requirement YMCA = 47 feet Apartments = 44 feet tall (York ; 56 feet tall (Xerxes Sj, d) Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet (Xerxes side to be adjusted) 10 feet (interior) 10 feet (interior) Building Coverage 30% 28% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50% - Non - residential uses 28% 100% - Residential & non - residential uses 81% 258,746 square foot site 209,000 s.f. total proposed 136,000 s.f. — residential 73,000 s.f. — non - residential Parking Stalls — Mixed Development Residential — 130 units; 1 enclosed & District .75 surface stalls per unit = 130 enclosed stalls and 97 surface stalls required 130 enclosed & 321 surface stalls proposed Non - Residential = 323 Total stalls required: 550 435 stalls proposed (544 with the proof of parking plan) * Requires a Variance PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and preliminary development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for seven reasons: 1. The proposed mixture of uses would be compatible within the area. The proposed housing adjacent to a YMCA would complement one another. The residents with physical disabilities could take advantage of the YMCA facilities so close in proximity. The apartments would be in character with the neighborhood as there are multiple family residential facilities to the north, south and west. (See page A46a.) 2. The project would encourage pedestrian movement throughout the development. The proposal encourages pedestrian movement to and from the site with sidewalks, and would connect with the Promenade (See page A2 & A28.) The applicant has revised the site plan to "beef up" the streetscape and pedestrian environment along York Avenue by adding trees and landscaping. (See pages All 2i— Al2k.) 3. The project would use sustainable development principles. (See page Al 1 of the applicant's narrative.) The applicant intends to utilize Green and Sustainable principals through the design and construction of the site and building. They intend to exceed the current State Energy Code for energy efficiency by a minimum of 20 %. They would use recycled building material in the new building and try to recycle up to 50% of the existing materials. The YMCA component is registered with the Xcel Energy Design Assistance Program to evaluate alternative energy saving measures for the design of the building and building systems. If the City Council approves the Preliminary Plans, Rezoning and Guide Plan amendment these principles would be further defined in the Final Development Plan. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of quasi - public. 5. The existing roadways would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both Spack and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic studies on pages A54a —A96.) 7 The Edina Transportation Commission met on September 18, 2008, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See the draft minutes on pages A97—Al 00.) 6. The proposed affordable housing units would help the city to be well on its way to achieve its established goal with the Met Council of providing 212 additional affordable housing units by the year 2030. 7. The proposed density of 22 units per acre meets the city's code requirement for density in the mixed -use district; and is consistent with densities of existing apartment buildings in the area. (See attached map locating multi- unit developments in the area on page A46a.) • Is the MDD -5 Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the MDD -5 is appropriate for the site. The rezoning would ensure that the housing and YMCA would be built as proposed within the district. The Overall Development plan essentially becomes the zoning for an MDD -5 District. A rezoning to MDD -5 would ensure that a YMCA or private recreational facility be located on this site with housing. Any redevelopment of the site would require an amended Overall Development Plan, which gives the City of Edina protections against any future redevelopment that might be inconsistent with those uses and /or uses within the area. Per Section 850.14. Subd. 5.B. for every 800 square feet of non - residential use, one dwelling unit must be built in the MDD -5 District. Therefore, non- residential uses cannot be built without residential dwelling units. Based on the proposal for 130 dwelling units, a YMCA could be up to 104,000 square feet in size. The proposed 73,000 square feet would meet this code provision. Y Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F., of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests. Should the preliminary plan be approved, the variances would be considered in more detailed with the Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals. 1) 'Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from comply ina with ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the Code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable for this site. The City Zoning Ordinance encourages i) ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment and ii) pedestrian connections by way of skyways and tunnels and, suggests the City -Council to consider exceptions to setback requirements for these purposes. The purpose of this request is to create an active pedestrian and streetscape and encourage pedestrian movement to and from the site. To that end, the applicant has pulled the YMCA building up to the street, rather than constructing the parking lot in front of the building. Pedestrians accessing the YMCA do not have to cross a parking lot in order to access the facility; they would walk to the front of the building by a sidewalk with no car crossings. The required intrusion into the setback for the YMCA is just 5 feet. This same principle also applies to the York Avenue side of the apartment building with the proposed 15 -foot setback intrusion. The applicant has beefed up the streetscape plan to create a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along York Avenue. (See pages A20i —Al 2k & Al 2o.) Also, the applicant has provided a graphic that shows the location of the existing and proposed entrances to the YMCA. (See page Al 2h.) The large 30 -foot variance to the south lot line is adjacent to a medium density housing development to the south, and 74th Street West. There is an unusually large amount (30 to 35 feet) of right -of -way from the improved portion of 70h Street, and 20 feet between the improved portions of Xerxes to the lot line. (See page A26.) The existing YMCA has just a 5- foot setback from the South lot line. (See page A26.) The proposed apartment building would have a 20 -foot setback, but would be 50 -55 feet from the improved portion of the roadway of 74th Street. The typical green space between lot lines and improved streets is 10 feet, as with the area between the improved portion of York Avenue and the lot line. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is that this site has right -of -way on three sides, and as mentioned, contains an unusually large amount of green space between the paved portion of 74th Street and Xerxes to the. lot lines. (See page A26.) 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed YMCA and four -story apartment building would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are several buildings in the immediate area that are taller and have greater densities than the proposed development. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi - Public to Mixed Use, and Preliminary Rezoning from R- 1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD -5.) Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall /Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit & Variances. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi - Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 29, 2008 & December 5, 2008. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A11 of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. 10 4. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 6. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be paved and meet all minimum requirements of the city engineer. 7. The temporary parking lot shall be reviewed by.the City Park Board during the Final Development Plan process. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at their cost. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. Deadline for a city decision: February 17, 2008 11 City of Edina Sr: i • +Yi Legend House Number Labels Street Name Labels City imits Creak. ❑ Lake Names Lakes ElParcels y r " f, f' 2006 Acrial Phcto r a it ' 0;�, '� � r wnn� ri ri Mrlr F III I— 'r■,1 � .rrl � owl AWO It .. fry ,` t r -, %• ,�5 .�, , 7112 :411 _ ■ t 7425 7170 F #. t 1420 ?4 7us 74" 7407, . .W6Cm/oafC .fRJLOKaee 9 PID: 3202824240002 y�t;3A,:t�1\ p K) ' 7355 York Ave S O Edina, MN 55435 s IV i „w txl 7041 3017x- 7020 7o164 71014001 4000 7110` 7001 7128 T171 aura ?4 7605 w 7151 7651 Lo nd 9e 4EioE� 7701 House Number Labels -'z =. _O�tS t362]a5 p Street Name Labels 24 City Limits 0 0 / Creeks 7200 ❑ Lake Names „...... 7201 r Lakes 7235 7240 ❑ Parks 7250• Zoning 24 � APD IAutamabia Pmt®ey aisir tl � 1016 24. 24 ❑ MDO.41Mu.ea tlmdepmw+Danrixal 1014'1115 610' 15 MoD•stMa.eowrsP>sreto.wu.+•sl 0 3821 11.1111 604 I\ `10021 602 709 —�y 703 MoD -S1Mb d Dm.WPmmnt D3+riut -SI '10 0�9i5-N �I 2y4� 0 ❑ °� 7335 24 91 }6 8DV, 51 9 7355 ■ Pao•t 1wm nae cs une m o.n a 1) 7380 A IF"'9905402 Soo 920 513 rcD- ztw,nnm4cm arD3tta -s) ?41501 ® vcoaln�naecsos4se•�I y7373 JS 21320311'"' PC041Panuao Co+m+mDiW:c+•41 ® 7390 106 315 74017400 309 74 7405 7404 ao la a mendoml et Ann ❑ 4000 7400 ., 14 303 y a 74097408 Pao -t JRtunm4 Offs— a e•t) "..: 21 74137412 ❑ PDD- 21Pfwned0fRmos1rie -2) PARKLARWAYE 74257430 ■ rRO- 1 lPVnum4Rm4un1 oa�t•t) 0. 7419 7434 ® PRO- 2(R—d Rmdmt o3te -21 .+.+x+..7450 T4 03+1.1.3) ..3955 7401 0 7433 7438 ® PRO•ti��R —amt T40i ---� ® PRDJ(Pmmnad Roi4un+oiRnct -al 241 7500 ® PRO- w% ..WRmdunt03 -S) 24 0 75041 . Ps11- 4JR.—1 3— Rmdmae V 0 0 75081 ❑ R- t(sorot.Duv" unao3usa) 0 ® R- 210oubb oraRnq 0" David) 7$SO 7$01 7512 Moouy Onalmt) RWID 4000 0 7520 Parcels 1-1 7600 7605 7651 7701 !daa oawdm:iAcMS Cmy: u1.' =. _O�tS t362]a5 nnial 24 YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Association Services 30 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 - 371 -8700 fax: 612 - 371 -8716 August 29, 2008 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 1: \iCA We buHd strong kids; sixong larn!Ees, sh'ong eornnurnities RE: YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Southdale YMCA Redevelopment Project Preliminary Development Plan Review, Rezoning, Comprehensive Guide Plan Change and Variance Dear Mr. Teague, Please accept the following and attached information as required submittal for Preliminary Development Plan Review, Rezoning, Comprehensive Guide Plan Change and Variance for the property owned by the YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis (YMCA) located at 7355 York Avenue South. Project Overview The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is a 150 year old organization that provides a variety of programs serving children, adults and seniors. The YMCA currently owns and operates 14 facilities in the Minneapolis and Metropolitan Minneapolis area. The YMCA is proposing to construct a new facility at their current location to accommodate growth and space needs to serve a variety of offered programs. The proposed redevelopment will provide a more efficient site and building to provide a wide variety of programming and services offered by the YMCA now and into the future. A large draw to the Southdale YMCA by the neighborhood, residents and surrounding community is its use as an intergenerational gathering space and community center. The proposed new facility will bolster the YMCA's ability to serve its members and the broader community. . The YMCA is partnering with CommonBond Communities (CommonBond), a nonprofit housing developer based in the Twin Cities area, to provide for the development of 130 units of housing on the YMCA site in conjunction with the redevelopment. The proposed development is consistent with surrounding uses and the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan for the area. This proposed development will provide additional tax base for the City of Edina, support the local businesses in the area with workforce and specific handicap accessible needs housing as well as offer programs and community space to residents in the City of Edina and surrounding areas. The proposed expansion will include an approximately 73,000 square foot YMCA and approximately 136,UUU square feet (130 units) of oust o rBan propose to develop the two buildings in three separate phases. The first phase will include the construction of the new YMCA (while the existing building remains open), the second phase will include the demolition of the existing YMCA and the construction of the single deck parking YMCA — Southdale Redevelopment Project Ltr to Cary Teague — August 29, 2008 Page 2 structure and the final phase will include the housing. Considering some of the high rise structures near their site, the YMCA originally began with a plan that included a single eight story structure combining the YMCA and the housing along York Avenue. The YMCA is sensitive to the City Council's desire for not more than four story structures along York Avenue, and therefore changed the plan to provide structures that do not exceed four stories in height. Due to this change, some variances are being, requested. It is the intent and desire of the YMCA to begin the first phase of construction in the spring of 2009. During the first phase of construction, the current facility will remain open to serve the community needs. To accommodate parking during the first and second phase projects, interim parking is planned for the portion of the park east of the skate -park and north of the existing YMCA parking lot in addition to existing parking behind the existing facility. The proposed housing will be designed and constructed with the intent of accommodating special needs and handicap accessible units. CommonBond is partnering with the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society of Minnesota to provide units to the MS Society for people with special needs. The balance of the units is Identified to accommodate workforce housing. The adjacency of the YMCA to the special needs housing will provide a logical synergy providing physical therapy facilities to the residents of the housing. CommonBond and the MS Society have previously partnered on a similar project, Kingsley Commons, located in Minneapolis. The project will also include amenities such as connections to the City trail system, a community room and a subleased space for a complimentary use such as a physical therapy clinic. Current Conditions The proposed property is currently occupied by a 2 story 70,000 square foot YMCA facility built in 1972 and a 355 space surface parking lot. Rezoning Currently, the subject site is zoned R -1 and is approximately 5.71 acres in size. The YMCA proposes to rezone the parcel to MDD -5 for the purposes of developing a new 2 -story 73,000 square foot YMCA and 130 units of housing within a 4 -story structure. The proposed use is consistent with the City of Edina's proposed Comprehensive Plan. This proposal will provide workforce and special needs housing for the area and an increased tax base for the City of Edina. The site will include approximately 369 parking spaces on grade and within the single deck structure (48 of which are dedicated to the housing). The housing will include 82 parking spaces sub grade of the housing structure. Based on the MDD -5 Zoning District, the allowable housing density is 3,300 square feet per unit. The housing allowance schedule provides for deductions to the per unit requirement. Based on the deductions for underground parking ( -500) and moderate income units ( -600), the maximum, deduction of -1,000 square feet is obtained. Therefore, the total density allowed is 2,300 square feet per unit. With a total lot of 249,000 square feet, 108 units would be allowed by code. With a proposed 130 housing units, a variance of 27 units is being requested. The MDD -5 Zoning requires a Conditional Use Permit for a use such as that proposed and currently operating by the YMCA. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change As part of the development proposal, the YMCA is asking for a comprehensive guide plan change from Quasi Public to Mixed Use to accommodate the proposed redevelopment plan. YMCA — Southdale Redevelopment Project Ltr to Cary Teague — August 29, 2008 Page 3 Site and Building Plan Review Site Location and Preparation The site for the proposed YMCA, housing and parking is located on the existing YMCA property on York Avenue South. The City Fire Station, Tri City -Skate Park and City Park are located along the north side of the property, Xerxes Avenue is located along the east edge of the site, single and multiple family housing is located along the south side of the site. The site will be developed in 3 phases. Phase I will include the construction of the new YMCA along York Avenue. Phase II will. include the demolition of the existing YMCA and construction of the parking deck. Phase III will include the construction of the housing. Site Access and Circulation Access to the site is provided by York Avenue. Currently there are two access drives to the site. The access drives will generally remain at the same locations, with the exception of a proposed shift of the North drive closer to the north property line. In addition to proposed modifications to the center median on York Avenue, a realignment of the north access drive will provide better vehicle stacking on York Avenue and the YMCA property. Additionally, better access for the Fire and Emergency vehicles heading south bound on York Avenue will be achieved. Please reference the traffic study attached provided by Spack Consulting and letter from Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County Traffic. Building Heights The height of the proposed YMCA building is 48'-0" above finish grade (el. 870 -0 � and the height of the housing building is 46' -0" above finish grade (el. 870' -0'�. Building_ Setbacks The MDD -5 Zoning district requires 50 foot setbacks from front, side and rear property lines. The buildings are proposed to setback 35 feet from the front and 20 feet from the south and east property lines. The north building line will be located outside of the required setback. The proposed setbacks match the MDD-6 Zoning requirements. A variance to the building setbacks outlined is being requested. Site Coverage Per section 850.14 Subd 6.A (City of Edina Code) the total site coverage allowance for buildings is 30% maximum. The following Is a breakdown of the building coverage for the proposed development: 37,720 SF Proposed YMCA footprint 31,725 SF Proposed Housing footprint 69,445 SF Total Footprint - or - 69,445/249,067 site SF = 27.9% Parkin Per section 850.08 Subd 1. A & 0 (City of Edina Code) the parking requirements for the YMCA and 130 housing units are: ■ YMCA (73,000 square feet / one space per 200 sq ft) = 365 parking spaces. Housing (1.25 enclosed spaces per unit + .75 exposed spaces per unit) = 260 parking spaces (162 covered /98 exposed) ® Total parking requirement per code for project = 625 spaces Per 850.08 Subd 5. D, joint parking facilities "shall not be less than the sum of the separate requirements for each use ". Based on the strict Interpretation of the Code, a variance to the parking requirement is being requested. At YMCA — Southdale Redevelopment Project Ltr to Cary Teague — August 29, 2008 Page 4 The total number of parking stalls proposed for this project: 369 spaces = Parking deck and lots (includes 48 spaces sub grade for the housing) 82 spaces = Housing underground parking 451 Total parking available for project The current site includes a 70,000 square foot structure with 355 surface parking spaces. Very infrequently are all the parking spaces on the current site utilized, particularly in the rear (east side) of the building where the stalls are far from the entrance of the building. The project will incorporate some shared parking between the housing and the YMCA. The submitted traffic report identifies a need for 315 stalls for both the YMCA and housing. It is the YMCA's experience that the parking suggested in the report is low compared to other YMCA facilities, and therefore is providing the number of parking spaces more In line with existing facilities. As for the housing, although the City Code requires 1 3/4 spaces for each housing unit, the parking for the project is sufficient for both the YMCA and the type of housing being proposed, particularly with the shared nature of the parking. Additionally, the special needs and workforce housing historically demands much less parking than the Code is requiring. Typically, either a single vehicle or no vehicles at all are owned by the residents. Additionally, the site is on a major bus route (BE Line) that provides great access to the public transit system. A proof of parking may be offered in conjunction with the proposed development. As an example, please find current building and parking data for existing YMCA facilities: Facility Total SF Number of Parking Stalls Parking Ratio Southdale Edina (current) 70,000 355 1/200 Southdale Edina (proposed) 73,000 330 1/221 Burnsville (MN Valley) 67,000 349 1/191 Elk River 56,000 276 1/202 Grading The proposed grading is similar to the existing site conditions, which slopes from west to east. The proposed YMCA facility and parking deck will have a first floor elevation of 870.00 with a lower level of 858.00, and the housing will have first floor elevation of 870.00 with a lower level elevation of 859.33. Grades slope away from the buildings at a minimum of 2.0% to a series of swales and low points which are collected by the storm sewer conveyance system. Drainage Storm water surface drains away from the buildings and is collected In the proposed storm sewer. A series of smaller HDPE pipes flow to a larger perforated piping system that will allow for infiltration and retention of a 2.5" rain event. In the larger rain events a relief pipe on the east side of the site connects to the City of Edina storm sewer system to allow for positive drainage. An emergency overflow one foot lower than the lowest opening -on the site has been provided at the northeast corner. The proposed storm water management exceeds the Nine Mile Creek infiltration and retention requirements. Utili The YMCA facility and the housing will be served with City of Edina water and sanitary sewer from York Avenue S. and Xerxes Avenue S. respectively. The existing YMCA facility is being serviced in similar locations. Each facility will have separate fire and domestic water services sized to meet domestic use as well as required fire suppression demands. Storm water from the buildings and parking deck will be collected in roof drains and routed to the perforated pipe to be Infiltrated. Al YMCA — Southdale Redevelopment Project Ur to Cary Teague — August 29, 2008 Page 5 Geotechnical A series of soil borings have been conducted on site at the proposed structure locations and a geotechnical report has been provided. The geotechnical report indicates suitable soil for the proposed development. Some minor soil corrections may be required. Landscaoina A comprehensive landscape plan and planting schedule Is provided with the submitted plans and meets the minimum standards of the City Code. Special attention Is being provided to the landscaping along east and south property lines, ensuring natural screening through a combination of burmming, new plantings and existing plantings to remain. Si4nage Building signage is proposed for the east and west building facades. Site signage will consist of a combination of way - finding and monumental signage throughout the site.. Locations will be provided at Final Site plan review and will meet City Code requirements. Green and Sustainable Building Systems The YMCA intends to utilize Green and Sustainable principals through the design and construction of the site and building. The YMCA component is registered with the Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance Program to evaluate alternative energy saving measures for the design of the building and building systems. Variances The proposed project includes requested variances to building setbacks, parking and number of allowable housing units. Based on the requested variances; we offer the following explanations to the statements of the Variance Application: i. Relieve undue hardship which was not self - imposed or mere inconvenience" The parking variance is being requested based on the parking required to effectively serve the proposed uses compared to the parking required by the strict interpretation of the City Code. Considering the unique nature of the uses proposed as a co- development and the comparison of parking provided at other YMCA facilities and similar housing developments, the proposed parking will meet the intended use for the project. Considering a portion of the parking will be shared between the uses and utilized during off peek of each use (as identified in the Traffic Study), the amount of parking being proposed will provided adequate parking for both uses. The setback variances being requested are due to the unique nature of the proposed co- development of uses. Enhancements to the building design and materials as well as the landscaping along adjacent properties will provide dean transitions and minimize site lines to the surrounding properties. The proposed project is consistent with the housing densities of the surrounding area. The height of the housing is similar or less compared to residential structures near the proposed project. The number and type of housing units proposed will have very minimal traffic impact on the surrounding roads. A variance to the number of allowed housing units as requested would not be detrimental to the surrounding uses. 2. "Correct extraordinarily circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district' rT YMCA — Southdale Redevelopment Project Ur to Cary Teague — August 29, 2008 . Page 6 As proposed, the YMCA and housing is unique to the current and proposed zoning district as well as the uses in the surrounding area. The variances are being requested because of the type of uses being proposed collectively in a single development. The project will offer enhanced design and building materials to an institutional level of design and construction. 3. "Preserve substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district" The proposed co- development is consistent with the uses and properties in the vicinity and zoning district. Collectively, the co- development should serve as an enhancement to the surrounding properties with a new YMCA facility that will allow for better programs and services to the surrounding community. The housing will provide units to residents with specific handicap accessible needs as well as units affordable to the workforce. Both the YMCA and housing buildings will have enhanced building materials including brick and stone. The YMCA will be designed and built to an Institutional level facility. 4. "Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the vicinity or zoning district" The development as proposed should enhance the welfare of the surrounding properties, zoning district and City by redeveloping an underutilized site with uses that provide unique synergies not only between the YMCA and the proposed housing, but with the surrounding properties, neighborhood and community. Neighborhood Meeting A meeting with the surrounding neighbors was conducted on August 28th at the Southdale YMCA. A mailing to all Richfield and Edina residents within 1,000 feet of the facility was sent out a week prior to the meeting. Approximately 25 residents attended the meeting. In addition to favorable comments regarding the proposed development, feedback included concerns about the landscaping along Xerxes, traffic and parking on Xerxes as well as construction duration and phasing of the project. Thank you for your time and consideration with this proposal and the City's continued support of the YMCA. If you should have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate contacting me at (612) 371 -8724. You may also contact our representative Steve Dorgan of CresaPartners listed below. Sincerely, Anita Lancello- Bydlon VP of New Development YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Representative: Steve Dorgan Senior Advisor, CresaPartners 80 South 8th Street, Ste 85n Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612 - 373 -0287 Fax: 612 - 337 -8459 Email: sdorQan @cresapartners.com A Atlanin Austin Bellevue Bethesda Iitrmingham [Boston C of go ry Charlotte Chi cage Cincinnati Dallas Donvet Derr oil Fairfield County Houston Indianapolis Los Angeles Momphis Miami MinucapoL= Montreal Nasln1ille New York Orange Coumy Ottawa Palo Alto Paramus Philadelphia Phoanis Pittsburgh Portland Princeton Sacramento San Francisco San Jose seattla St. Louis 'rownto Tncson Tysons Corner Vunoouver Washington DC CresaPartners CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS September 17, 2008 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Southdale YMCA Redevelopment Project Supplemental information to Preliminary Development Plan Review Application Dear Mr. Teague, Pursuant to your request, please accept the following information as supplemental information to the YMCA's submittal for Preliminary Development Plan Review, Rezoning, Comprehensive Guide Plan Change and Variance. Proposed Breakout of Housing Units by Income For the proposed CommonBond housing project, the following breakout provides the percentage of units allocated for the Average Median Income (AMI) category. AMI changes year to year and by county. We have also provided FY 2008 the AMI for Hennepin County. The housing Is further broken out to include 50% of the total units allocated as accessible for people with multiple sclerosis and other physical disabilities. 20% of units: 15% to 30% AMI 30% of units: 50% to 59% AMI 30% of units: 60% to 69% AMI 20% of units: Market Rate County. Hennepin Effective Date: 0213 12003 AI0 AtisReal 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 850 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 tel 612.337.8498 ■ fax 612.337.8459 ■ www.cresapartners.com -- - - - - -- Inc.olne Limits By Household Size -- - - - - -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 30% 16,980 19,410 21,840 24,270 26,220 28,140 30,090 32;040 35% 19,810 22,645 25,480 28,315 30,590 32.830 35,105 37,380 40% 22.640 25,880 29;120 32;360 34,960 37,520 40.120 42;720 45% 7_5,470 29.115 32,760 .36,405 39130 42,210 45,135 48,060 50% 28,300 32;350 36,400 40,450 43,700 46,900 50.150 53,400 55% 31.130 35,585 40,040 44,495 48,070 51,590 55.165 58,740 60% 33;960 38.820 43,680 48,540 52,440 56,230 60,180 64,080 AI0 AtisReal 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 850 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 tel 612.337.8498 ■ fax 612.337.8459 ■ www.cresapartners.com CresaPartners C O R P O R A T E R E A L E S T A T E S E R V I C E A D V I S O R S Green /Sustainable Initiatives The YMCA proposes to incorporate green and sustainable practices into the design, construction and operation of the proposed project. The following items outline some of these elements. The YMCA and CommonBond will continue to pursue additional opportunities as the design is further developed and the project is implemented. 1. The mechanical systems will exceed the current State Energy Code for energy efficiency by a minimum of 20% 2. Recycled material: a. 85% of all new building materials will have some percentage of recycled content b. The value of all of the recycled content is targeted-at 12% of all material costs c. A goal of 50% of the material of the demolished existing building will be recycled and diverted from disposal d. Existing on -site paving materials will be reused on site to the best extent possible 3. Low emitting materials will be specified for adhesives, sealants, paints, carpet systems 4. Interior lighting systems will on a lighting control system or controlled by local room switches /occupancy sensors to save electricity 5. Interior domestic water use will be reduced below standards by 20% through use of special fixtures and systems design. 6. Regional materials will be specified to best extent possible. 7. Site design will accommodate use of alternative transportation, including 3 bus routes on York,' bike racks, and onsite sidewalks that could connect to the larger city trail system. Additionally, the YMCA is working with Xcel Energy's Design Assist program to review opportunities for energy efficient. building materials and systems. Please let me know if you should have any further questions or need clarification to the proposed project. As always, please do not hesitate contacting me. Sincerely Steve Dorgan Senior Advisor, CresaPartners 612 - 373 -0287 cc: Anita Lancello- Bydlon, YMCA Greg Hanks, YMCA Greg Fenton, BWBR Architects a�l TAI National Multiple Sclerosis Society Minnesota Chapter August 27, 2008 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Teague: The National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Minnesota Chapter sincerely hopes that you will support the proposed redevelopment of the Southdale YMCA site that will include accessible and affordable housing for people with multiple sclerosis and other physical disabilities. There is a real shortage of this type of housing for people with disabilities, as well as for seniors who wish to age in place. Our staff regularly hears from members who experience difficulty finding accessible, affordable housing; some have.been on waiting lists for six to 24 months. The Minnesota Chapter represents over 9,000 people with MS in Minnesota and western Wisconsin. Our chapter provides research dollars and hundreds of programs, services and advocacy efforts that promote greater independence and seek to enhance the lives of people who have MS. Over the past few years, we have collaborated with partners to provide appropriate housing options so people with MS and other disabilities can maximize their independence and be integrated into community life. We recently worked with CommonBond Communities on Kingsley Commons, an affordable, accessible apartment complex near Shingle Creek in Minneapolis. All of the 24 units have been occupied and a waiting list has reached over 40 people since it opened last year. We truly believe this redevelopment effort will be a tremendous asset to the City of Edina, the YMCA and its members, and for people who will value the accessible living options it would provide. Sincerely, I/) Maureen Reeder President ON 20012th Ave. S. Minneapolis MN 55415 -1255 tel 612 335 7900 fax 612 335 7997 www.NiSsociety.org APP�i�kNt RESPoNSC TO PLA#J#JJA)(0 COMMISSION lSrvES CresaPartners IN s -e D CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS a''n December 5, 2008 A nSIM Belle, ue — - Bethesda "il,nil,. l„n, Cary Teague "osion Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Ch ic au o Edina, MN 55424 Cincinnati Dallas RE: YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Den, of Southdale YMCA Redevelopment Project Detroit Response to Planning Commission Meeting Comments and Questions 1 =a ini eld County "°°'`°° Dear Mr. Teague, Indianapolis - Los Angeles As a resuit'of the questions and comments received at the Planning Commission Public Hearing Memphis meeting on October 1St and Neighborhood Meeting on August 28th, we have outlined specific hlwni` responses. We hope the following "Question and Answer" response addresses the outstanding Ivlinneupo Its questions and concerns from neighbors and Planning Commissioners regarding the proposed project. IvlonIIeal We have also modified the site and building plans and have attached for the staff and the Planning Nashville Commission's consideration. Neu fork Orange County Site and Building: 0t I.—a Palo Alto Para us 1. Q. What are the height limits for buildings in that area according to the cities comprehensive Philadelphia plan? Phoenix A: The proposed buildings are within the allowable height Pittsburch Portland 2. Q. Why tear down the Y and increase it by only 3000 sq ft? Princeto.) A: Although only slightly larger in square footage than the existing YMCA, the design affords Sacramento more total program space and more flexible larger spaces than the existing facility.- The San Francisco member experience will be enhanced and operating expenses are decreased as a result of a San .lose new facility. Additionally, the new facility will meet the current design standards for new Seattle YMCA facilities, which provides flexible use of the space to respond to changing program St. Loais needs. . T oronlo T a e s ° n 3. Q. Describe the orientation of the YMCA building, proximity of the front door of the Y and Tvsons corner - use of windows in the building? Vancouver - A: The YMCA facility is located on the front of the site for the following reasons: \Va hin•_ton DC 1. To allow the existing facility to continue to remain open serving the members, kids, and community during the construction of the new building, which is estimated to take 13 months. ' 2. To create a strong street edge of building along York Avenue, displaying the use of the site in a more urban sense than a traditional suburban development siting the property in the order of street/parking /building in back. Staff has endorsed this concept and it follows City prerogatives of developing an enhanced experience along York Avenue. Atispeai 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 850 a Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 :I11>Nt: NEUFLR OF ,NE IIISNE E INtEPN41,O�-,NE NEA! ESI.rE GROUP tel 612.337.8498 a fax 612.337.8459 a www.cresapartners.com CresaPartners CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS 3. To allow the YMCA to maximize their "visibility" along the street and promote the benefits and programs afforded to the surrounding community. 4. To allow the least amount of large building to be placed along the back side of the site (along Xerxes Avenue) where the smallest scale of building exists (residences) and shadow the neighbors to the east. The placement of the concentration of new construction, including the housing, has been carefully considered to minimize a mismatch of scale with the various types of existing neighbors. The east side of the parking structure is over 60' west of the curb on Xerxes. The east line of proposed curbing on site is at the location of the current curb line of the east parking lot. The YMCA and design team very much feel that the building has been designed as a four sided, "fully exposed" and visible building. Every facade has features to bring light inside the building and to help break down the scale of the building massing. There is no blank back side to the YMCA building, as typically found with most development, and thus not negatively impacting a neighbor with a scale less facade. Due to the specific functions of spaces such as the pool and locker rooms, windows are minimized or excluded from these spaces. The point of entry of the YMCA building is on the east side of the building. The walking path distance to the parking stalls on the current site ranges from 110 -700' from the front door, with 80% 380' or closer to the door. The new site plan illustrates walking distances of 90'- 440' from the entry, with 80% of the stalls 260' or closer (almost 1/3 less distance than the existing parking lots) to entry into the building. Current walking distances from public sidewalk on York at the lot corners in the southwest or northwest are between 450 -470' with much of the distance traveling through the parking lot. The proposed site plan has distances via onsite sidewalks, versus the parking lot, to the front door of 460- 490' from the same lot corners. This results in a shorter distance for pedestrians to access the YMCA from York Avenue. Finally, it is critical for the operation of the YMCA to provide a single access point for people arriving and leaving the facility. As previously mentioned, the single point of entry is located at the east side of the building to most easily accommodate all persons arriving at the YMCA. 4. Q. Describe how windows are used in the pool area? A: Safety is the number one issue when designing an aquatic environment. The design has placed windows in locations to carefully allow daylight to enter the space without creating glare across the water surfaces. Glare can prohibit seeing "through" the surface of the water and detecting underwater objects. The design has large windows with a northern exposure to maximize indirect light while maintaining safety inside. 5. Q. is there a boulevard along York or not? A: Yes. Please reference the attached site plan and perspectives plan showing proposed enhanced boulevard along York Avenue,in front of the proposed development. Enhancements are on the property of the site. Al h Southdale YMG4 -Redevelopment Proposal Supplemental Letter to city of Edina - 12/5/08 CresaPartners CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS 6. Q. Is there enough parking? The proposal has 100 less stalls than before. Would you consider a bus shelter along York Ave. ? A: Based on the submitted traffic study by Spack Consulting, the proposed parking for both the YCMA and Housing exceeds the minimum recommended parking spaces by 70. Also, the proposed parking for the YMCA /square foot of the proposed building is consistent with that of other newly developed YMCA's, which all currently function with no parking issues. Parking for the housing, equaling 1 space /unit, is consistent with parking provided at other similar housing projects that includes people with physical handicaps. As part of the proposed project, the YMCA is including "proof of parking" for the spaces that would bring the parking to the exact number required by City Code. Four years ago the west front parking lot was replanned, but not enlarged, which resulted in 95 new parking stalls. Those stalls afforded members greater convenience than stalls on the east side of the lot totaling that same number. The stalls on the east side of the site are rarely used due to the inconvenience of distance to the front door (over 500' in many instances). The YMCA is willing to work with Metro Transit to install a bus shelter in close proximity to the proposed project along York Avenue. Please reference the attached site plan showing a possible shelter location. CommonBond Housing 1. Q: What other properties in Edina are owned by CommonBond? A: CommonBond Communities owns and manages South Haven, Yorkdale Townhomes and Summit Point. 2. Q. How would you describe your relationships with your neighbors? A: Generally speaking very good. There was an issue with an individual some years ago over our residents parking on the street. That was resolved. 3. Q: Will there be a full -time property manager for the housing? A: Yes, CommonBond Communities will provide full -time management for the Housing. 4. Q: Where are the police stall on the Yorkdale building? Describe police calls to Yorkdale Townhomes? A: Attached please find statistics on police calls for the Yorkdale housing development from November 1, 2007 — September 30, 2008. The City of Edina assigns Community Liaison Officers to large properties, such as Yorkdale, that stop by to see if there are any issues onsite where they can help. The. Officers stops by on a random basis at the Yorkdale offices (7429 York). From November 1- September 30"', the Community Liaison Officer stopped by Yorkdale 28 times. The Traffic Violations that are listed on the Police Report are not related to the Yorkdale property or its residents. The City of Edina Police have GPS in their vehicles and when they Ala Southdale YMCA -Redevelopment Proposal Supplemental Letter to City of Edina - 12/5/08 CresaPartners CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS stop someone for a traffic violation the GPS picks up the closest address. From November 1- September 30th, there were 10 traffic violations. A number of the Police calls were associated with car repossessions. There were 4 vehicle repossessions over the 11 month period. A number of the calls to the Police in June, 2008, were associated with unit 7525. The resident living moved in on June 12, 2008- when the police calls began, and was encouraged to leave thereafter. The resident vacated their unit August 30th, 2008 and police calls ceased. There were 10 calls associated with unit 7525. The remaining calls to the Edina Police are less than 44 calls over an it month period. 5. Q: Neighbors of Yorkdale have said there is an average of 70 police calls per year to the Yorkdale site including crimes of assault, shootings and various other crimes. Is this true? A: CommonBond has an excellent working relationship with the Edina police department and believe the number of police calls is not out of line with the rest of the community. The characterizations of shootings, assault, etc. is overstated. The property is a safe and secure place to live. Please reference the attached police report. 6. Q: Describe the selection process for residents especially being so dose to the Y? A: The selection process will be handled by CommonBond's compliance department, which must follow Fair Housing Guidelines. 7. Q. Will there be discounted memberships to the Y for people in the Common8ond building? A: Currently, there are no plans to provide special discounts to the housing residents. 8. Q: Where is the subsidy for the subsidized housing coming from? A: The housing will not be subsidized. A large portion of the financing for the housing will be provided through multiple sources, including the syndication of Housing Tax Credits. Housing built with Housing Tax Credits are able to obtain a smaller mortgage, therefore reducing the amount of rent required to cover the mortgage. g. Q. How is the housing project financed? A: The housing project will be financed using 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credits and Bonds. 10. Q. Will there be underground parking for residents? A: Yes, secured underground parking will provided for residents. 11. Q. Is there enough parking for the housing or are you assuming people with disabilities don't drive? A: CommonBond has learned through their management experience that residents of senior and -,penal needs developments require less than one parking space per unit. CommonBond will provide one parking space per unit (includes both above an a ow ground parking) at the Southdale YMCA site. quad Southdale YMCA -Redevelopment Proposal Supplemental Letter to City of Edina - 11/5/08 CresaPartners CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS 12. Q: Is CommonSond the same group who was going to tear down housing to build a denser housing project last year? Are they hiding that from the commission? A: CommonBond Communities did propose the redevelopment of the Yorkdale Townhomes. The Yorkdale Redevelopment project is currently on hold. CommonBond sees the Yorkdale Redevelopment and the YMCA Redevelopment as two•completely separate and distinct projects and therefore does not integrate the two when discussing their development plans. 13. Q. Describe more about the apartments and their layout. A: There will be a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units. All units will be designed and built using Universal Design principals for people requiring specific accessibility needs. 14. Q. How will units be allocated to people with disabilities? A: All of the units within the housing development will be designed using Universal Design principles. CommonBond will work with the MCCD and the MS Society to market units to individuals with disabilities. It is our goal to have at least 50% of the units occupied by individual's and /or families with disabilities. CommonBond Communities abides by Fair Housing Laws when marketing and renting their properties. 15. Q. What made up the percentages of targeting 50% for people with disabilities? A: The financing we are proposing for the housing requires that 50% of the units be rented to individuals and /or families with disabilities. We are not limited to renting only 50% of the units to people with disabilities. 16. Q: Describe Housing parking arrangements. A: Parking for the apartments will include 82 spaces sub grade, beneath the apartment building as well as 48 spaces beneath the parking structure. All entry points to the apartment building will be either internal to the apartment structure or at a single entry point, which faces internal towards the YMCA. No entry points will be located along the south or west of the proposed apartment building. Therefore, residents of the apartment will not utilize the adjacent streets for parking. The adjacent streets are already signed with "no parking ". 17 Q: Describe the lease policy and how allocated to people with disabilities. A: CommonBond Communities abides by Fair Housing laws when marketing and renting their properties. Residents that apply for housing, must fill out an application that includes income verification, credit history, rental history, and criminal background checks. CommonBond Communities requires a one -year lease to rent an apartment. 18. Q. Any concerns about mixing people with disabilities and people without a disability? A: While 50% of the units would be accessible, the.other units would be Universally Designed to meet the needs of all people (with and without disabilities) as they age. Many of the MNCCD disability organizations' members favor accessible or Universally- designed housing options that are integrated and intergenerational. population? A: CommonBond has proactively addressed this concern at its other residences, including Kingsley Commons, by educating residents on keeping themselves and the building safe and southdale YMCA -Redevelopment Proposal supplemental Letter to City of Edina - 12/5/08 CresaPartners CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS secure. Like other CommonBond properties, this building would feature a security system, including security cameras and entry code pads. 10. Q. How would CommonSond work with its neighbors while managing the property? A: CommonBond works hard to be good neighbors and to be seen as an asset to the surrounding community. 21. Q. Request for assurances from Common8ond that they would be a good partner along with additional letters of support at the next Planning Commission meeting. A: CommonBond Communities has a long history of being a good neighbor and partner. We have contacted a number of organizations that have partnered with us and they will be providing letters of support to the Planning Commission and City Council. 22. Does Common8ond have security on site at its properties? A: From time to time at the larger family sites and regularly at the three high rises in Minneapolis and St Paul. General Ouestions 1. Q. Who is paying for the YMCA? A: YMCA is funded through a capital campaign, which is a standard for funding new Metropolitan Minneapolis YMCA's. 2. Q. Who was notified about the Aug 2e neighborhood meeting? A: All owners of properties within 1,000 feet of the YMCA property, including Edina and Richfield, were mailed notices of the neighborhood meeting 10 days prior to the meeting. The mailing lists were provided by both the City of Edina and City of Richfield. 3. Q: Who will own the buildings? A: The YMCA will own their building and all of the land associated with the development. The portion of land used for the housing will be leased to CommonBond and CommonBond will own their building. 4. Q: Concerned about garbage from the current YMCA site blowing into yards along Xerxes. A: The proposed development will place all trash receptacles within an enclosed structure. The internal spaces along Xerxes will have more active use, resulting in better oversight of these areas. Increased buffering may be provided to mitigate any items that may blow off of the site to the east. 5. Q. How was Richfield residents in close proximity notified about neighborhood meeting? A: It is the YMCA's understanding that the City of Edina provided a copy of the proposal material to the City of Richfield and that the City of Edina does not formally notice property owners or residents within the City of Richfield. 0 Q • ExpMSW concerns with a parking deck facing a neighborhood. A: See earlier response noting distances away from the property line for the face of the ramp. The height.of the single floor ramp is approximately 14'. The YMCA has proposed enhanced berming and landscaping along Xerxes to screen the site and structures. Southdale YMC4 - Redevelopment Pmposal Supplemental Letter to City of Edina - 1215/08 CresaPartners CORPORATE REAL ESTATE SERVICE ADVISORS 7. Q. The City's comprehensive plan calls for buildings to orientate themselves toward a major street. Describe why this plan couldn't be done differently? A: See earlier response. We feel the buildings are orientated towards the street while affording practical convenience of building access closest to the parking. 8. Q. What kind of berming would be done on site? A: The east side of the site will have built up grading to help screen vehicle headlights and additional landscaping within the property line will be placed behind the existing landscaping between the property line and curb line of Xerxes. Please let me know if you should have any further questions or need clarification to the proposed project. As always, please do not hesitate contacting me. 75 Sincerely i ) Steve Dorgan Senior Advisor, CresaPartners 612 - 373 -0287 Attachments: A: Police Call Summary — Yorkdale Townhomes B: Revised Design Concepts (15 sets) C: Pedestrian Travel Distance Diagram (15 sets) D: Revised Civil, Site and Landscape Plans (15 sets) cc: Anita Lancello - Bydlon, YMCA Greg Hanks, YMCA Greg Fenton, BWBR Architects Rachael Robinson, CommonBond Communities Steve Korngable, MS Society Southdale YMCA - Redevelopment Proposal supplemental Letter to City of Edina - 12/5/08 10/24/2008 FRI 9:33 FAX 952-253 0112 YORKDALE TOWNHOMES -•-i central ofc -12002/004 2006 -0cT -09 13:16 FROM- T -474 P.002/004 F -909 Calls from 7401 - 7553 York Avenue from November 1, 2007 • Septamber 30, 2008 street incl id cam callti a nature 101221200713:43 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7401 YORK AV S 2007444802 11191200714:08 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 7401 YORK AV S 200804315 21412008 8:36 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 7401 YORK AV S 200805367 08000469 2112120081:41 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 7401 YORK AV S 200809892 3/21/2008 22 :40 911 FOLLOW UP 7401 YORK AV S 200816114 51111200813:43 MISCELLANOUS OFFICER 7401 YORK AV S 200816492 51141200810:53 MISCELLANQUS AFFICER 7401 YORK AV S 200823241 7141200810:41 911 FOLLOW UP 7403 YORK AV S 200821890 61241200817:53 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 7407 YORK AV S 200832905 08002838 91161200810:08 MISCFL.I.ANEOUS PUBLIC 7411 YORK AV S 200742453 07040197 101211200717:23 DOMESTIC 12/2412007 21:11 SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE PERSON 7417 YORK V S 200746547 1112412007 2245 PARKING COMPLAINT 7417 YORK AV S 20021933 5124/2008 23:02 91 FOLLOW UP 7417 YORK AV S 200830927 08002682 81301200814.08 DOMESTIC 7427 YORK AV S 200821300 61201200812:17 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 10/412007 13:14 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200740292 10/91207 11:38 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 74-29 YORK AV S 20745350 111141200712:58 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 12/3/2007 13.40 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200749105 12M712007 13:36 COMMUNITY ORIENTED 1131200814:06 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200800294 11221200813:52 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200802801 11311200613:34 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200803845 3171200813 :42 COMMUNITY ORIENTED ERS C 7429 YORK AV S 200809073 3114/2008 22:36 SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE P 3/17/2008 15:04 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 720 YORK AV S 20080869 3130120081:14 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 4111200813:12 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200811173 4/91200813 :66 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200812128 4128/Z008 13:39 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200814401 5/1312008 11:38 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200816351 7429 YORK AV 6141200614:42 COMMUNITY ORIENPOLICE 7429 YORK AV S 00820260 61131200811:12 COMMUNITY ORIENTED 7429 YORK AV S 200821853 6124/2008 13:23 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 7429 YORK AV S 6/241200813:25 COMMUNITY O POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200823577 717/2008 7:39 MISCELLANEOU S PUBLIC 71812008 2:40 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLIO 7429 YORK AV S 200823666 7116/2008 22:59 SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE PERSON 7429 YORK AV S 200824937 08002134 71171200814:14 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 20082 7124/2068 7 :32 RECOVERED STOLEN VEHICLE YORK AV S 200826236 7126/2008 21:41 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE AV S 200828701 713012008 14:05 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7 29 YORK AV S 200827245 8/312008 20:14 DISTURBANCE 8/6/2008 0:32 SU5PICI0US VEHICLE PERSON 7429 YORK AV S 200827561 81131200814:30 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV 8 200828633 7429 YOW AV 8 8119120088 4:42 SUSPICIOUS VOEHIEC E D POLIC ON E 7429 YORK AV S 200830110 9/2/200813:52 COMMUNITY OK[t-'- 0 POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 911 812008 14!27 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 20083929 9/2512005 14:38 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 7429 YORK AV S 200834013 7429 YORK AV S 200834573 91301200814:22 COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICE 2/6/200810:11 PRIVATE PROPERTY TOW OR REPO 7429 -LOT YORK AV S 200804655 2=00810:16 PRIVATE PROPERTY TOW OR REPO 74299 -LoT YORK AV S 2008122682 411112008 0:16 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY x lain 10/24/2008 FRI 9:34 FAX 952 253V0112 YORKDALE TOWNHOMSS - -- central oft 2003/A04 , 2006-OCT-09 13:17 FROM- 8J3/2008 19 :45 PRIVATE PROPERTY TOW OR REPO 6127/2008 23:25 911 FOLLOW UP 7113/200813:17 C13Y CODE VIOLATION 8/13/2008 23.11 DOMESTIC 1120/2008 21:40 MEDICAL EMERGENCY 9/29/2008 22:01 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 7/23/2008 21:06 MEDICAL EMERGENCY 913/2008 8:15 WELFARE CHECK 12191200718:49 ASSAULT 21152008 10:16 DOMESTIC 2!222008 22;26 WARRANT ARREST 2127/200817 :17 VIOLATE ORDER FOR PROTECTION 4/21200618:02 UNWANTED GUEST 4/121200814:19 UNWANTED GUEST 91251200818:07 TI:RRORISTIC.THREATS 6127!200814:04 HARASSING COMMUNICATION 6/12!2008 23:44 AUTO THEFT 6/13/200811:52 ATTEMPT TO LOCATE 8/1212008 0:24 DISTURBANCE 81i2120081:39 DISTURBANCE 8/13/2008 19:08 UNWANTED GUEST 8/14120081127 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 811512008 14:34 CIVIL STANDBY 8/20/200815:46 THEFT 8127/20081820 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 8/1012008 2220 DISTURBANCE 12/1612007 9:10 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 10/17/2007 22:05 DOMESTIC 11251200818:56 DISTURBANCE 319/2008 3:55 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY 1212412007 23 :32 911 FOLLOW UP 4/11200812:33 WELFARE CHECK 7/22/2008 22:56 DISTURBANCE 1/71200814:16 MEDICAL EMERGENCY 614/2008 3:57 PRIVATE PROPERTY TOW OR REPO 10/22!2007 16:28 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 10124/2007 9:27 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 111812008 0:52 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 3/2212008 14:21 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 6/8200819:37 TRAFFIC VIOLATION 71412008 0:53 KID CALL 8130/200813:53 NEIGHBOR DISPUTE 7429 -LOT YORK AV 7435 YORK AV S 7439 YORK AV S 7439 YORK AV S 7455 YORK AV S 7501 YORK AV S 7507 YORK AV S 7511 YORK AV S 7517 YORK AV S 7517 YORK AV S 7517 YORK AV S 7517 YORK AV S 7517 YORK AV S 7517 YORK AV 8 7517 YORK AV 8- 7519 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7625 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7525 YORK AV S 7527 YORK AV S 7529 YORK AV S 7531 YORK AV S 7531 YORK AV. S 7531 YORK AV S 7545 YORK AV S 7545 YORK AV S 7545 YORK AV S 7547 YORK AV S 7549 YORK AV S 7553 YORK AV S 7553 YORK AV S 7563 YORK AV S 7553 YORK AV S 7553 YORK AV S 7553 YORK AV S 7553 YORK AV S pa )C�) T -474 P.003 /004 F -969 3200827242 200822381 200824}82 200828599 200802576 200834506 200825857 200831366 200748213 07040872 200805748 08000492 200806639 08000571 200807171 200811360 •200812453 200834042 200822309 200820208 0800/717 2Q0820269 08001719 200828443 200828454 200828667 200828765 200828935 200829596 200830608 200828280 200748984 200741955 07040141 200803179 200808388 200750143 200811182 200825737 200800$54 200819068 200742545 200742747 200802219 200809933 200819762 200823206 200830925 L--4p, C� User: SQUIST EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT CAD Events Street starts Mlh 76' Street number isbetwc '3260'and'3279 Case ID \Gloss Code Nalure DesrrT 'on Call Time Address 20081592Z FO IME OTHER 05/09/2008 23:00:27 3200 76 ST W 7Anwassoln CA L00748015 911 911 FOLLOW UP 12107/2007 21:14:09 3214 76 ST %V ?009022-12 SCA SOSPECTED CHMD ABUSE 0111 &70.08 0921:10 3220 76 ST W 200744829 DIST DISTMANCE 11!09!2007 1 B: 19.37 3220 76 ST W 200745 6 CCD C1ID.D CUSTODY DISPUTE 11/11!2007 19:13:51 3220 76 ST W 2007501108 14PD MT AND RUN PD ACCIDENT 1212412007 15:25:10 3224 76 ST N 200817302 SV SUSPIC1Ol]S VEFECLE PERSON 05/20/20DB 20:54:26 3228 76 ST A' 200816295 N ED MMICAL EMERGENCY 05/122008 20 :48:51 3232 76 SS W 200741856 MED MEDICAL EMERGEICY 10/17/2007()8:25:12 3244 76 ST W 206B00 14 MID MEDICAL BMOWENICY 01/05/2008 19:1029 3248'76 ST W 200819 1 MIS? MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 061081200818:42 :42 3252 76 ST W 2001075 911 911 Ft7LLA1V U? 03/29!200811:00:14 3260 76 ST W 20080 92 1iA,R HARASSING COMMUNICATION 02121!200813:21:23 3262 76 ST W 200804 82 TV , TRAFFIC VIOLATION 02/03/2008 09.06:31 3264 76 ST W 20083 71 TV TRAFFIC VIOLATION 03125/200814.13:18 3265 76 ST W 20074;157 TV TRAFFIC VIOLATION 10/13/200717:29:15 3268 76 ST W I UJUVILUU5 11:" 0 N ` N m � O N Q. to m H w �x N N w 0 N K 0 z 0 ca H O 1 0 03 N a a n co �r n w 0 ro n i A 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 A O P 1\/ .4- T Io L�C�E� ,a- -as - —I , PARKING - DECK ♦ ------- - - - - -- b b NEW �-�► YMCA I �` CURRENT Y COMMONBOND Pedestrian Travel Distance Diagram Current Building and New Building �R Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project 1 � 2w, , l�� � � :_��� � ��a�*• - =ems � r( �` �� 1 , • '� . �- Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project 19CIE, 7 E r View at York Avenue from Northwest W View at York Avenue from West M • Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project M\ 1_. IrIgI '�,•";v - I� tae �, �'�! I I, � �' '! 11 1 V � Y Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project RI 1'r Aerial View from West x � Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project D /--"% r�..__ Aerial View from Northeast �7 74, V., Act E!tl _'. View at Corner of 74th Street West Looking West Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project View at Corner of 74th Street West & Xerxes Avenue from Southeast IOR I6{610MIt GH1H W AROW WAWMD. ; IS SUG D SIIGGeSITD CDT FPACONG A111TT PMCIICK MFINED IPIIS W {RANDAND ARD T-0 CIOSTDIG . RAMWG 6 COMRFK. =M AND LACKING IOIK l—.G DTKWI. EWF CACOeL {AWRATE srn MRH COWALT AEOU TITAN AtTVEAw nuAte. p nINLOR Ew 0.s IXANCH �0 G -ONE PU WIYE 2 - PERSee PU sec MONAD Cl \ ERAN 9AND SIOFS OE ANIDtc TN AIrnINDLE SUeG11A[N r,[ IDSPONAM FOR �•+ WE I N MTU P0.g0. TO WE A°CMKC'T POOP DINNAU UDIS. � pRYe0.11�PNG e DeK10M191f t0{ K TITS IN A RDAEI U uEAT TN[wAexANry G 6SDGGE BIII ,Y ANY sADNC NIISI \ Q IIeAL -IICIS AS DffINED IDLES ro{ STANDMD AArAD eeAnol[s D COIrIFR. ,GCmG AND LAenwG IRKFeNA[Wnl AT JO SA1KMTe 504 WITH T CONPAR AIOef THAN A4MAm PlIW6 MEN F OR T W - .O 011E R0. WII! / - 7.111,c 9TIM i EDGO IIRNFD G0.AVLL MM -14 CAD TRW 7 -"'cWm Tm ' I I � I 'S -Ir TAU MRS 'S- LVCAIEI[{Ti I i I i I i II I / • W TAU um E -vT�n oe - - E•1S /1�1 _ e -v TRUE _ _ irISKNG ICE ml I rR [ I CAU IN LT LANDSCAPE PLA SEE SPECS. -T iEE SPECS. T S ALE- SEEPIAN C iIMINI LOW - SOIL- SEESPEM cn TINGLE OF VERIAL PRIOR TING —W., SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING MINA, MN ARCHITECTS , C-ns 3W SL Peter S-4 Suite 600 Seib[ PIUL NIN 5510L1996 65137L3701 n...A�SSOCIATES r10o,M,ln1 Lw -YY m u4lvcmm•Em w ..:E.mN..Teo,al u�N. �'.{'1 ATU � t► 1°ed re 5 1 17 J;i � [f6im�mmlE� °eW1FE{nflea TALL Y>Ql tW° e°n AwE EoEp1w a eDn Short ednc m lmmcTwmw _ 'w erm.Dnm _ v°nwwlun alaulmllwmolluui . N�IItyYeY _ �,40D11Ol.,Ylr _0DE81 _ pIN D4leTA0 mm TmmAUm.DSTwD IEPLNN - — -� 4, W�> ALL ANT .NDSIO Of s J; :rD SO THAI 0000l ;Ef SPEC JIGjOIOIC Ii0I0I0IyI0. SEE M '1 .�PI O.O L4 `�`�' I� Y,��1 n� \.AV[YEV:IY JlP1V.il {. -V ��(+ a TO FILM r o.�n ►001 r�rjiJ'�:• � O �00f01 � - a _ x� ROM �%ii '�'► ESFEr- �F _ r ml I rR [ I CAU IN LT LANDSCAPE PLA SEE SPECS. -T iEE SPECS. T S ALE- SEEPIAN C iIMINI LOW - SOIL- SEESPEM cn TINGLE OF VERIAL PRIOR TING —W., SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING MINA, MN ARCHITECTS , C-ns 3W SL Peter S-4 Suite 600 Seib[ PIUL NIN 5510L1996 65137L3701 n...A�SSOCIATES r10o,M,ln1 Lw -YY m u4lvcmm•Em w ..:E.mN..Teo,al u�N. �'.{'1 ATU � t► 1°ed re 5 1 17 J;i � [f6im�mmlE� °eW1FE{nflea TALL Y>Ql tW° e°n AwE EoEp1w a eDn Short ednc m lmmcTwmw _ 'w erm.Dnm _ v°nwwlun alaulmllwmolluui . N�IItyYeY _ �,40D11Ol.,Ylr _0DE81 _ pIN D4leTA0 mm TmmAUm.DSTwD I a iIIRR I � II G �T[YPODAIiT I \I V♦ I I PMKMC LOT i � I' V M•+.N 9af. Pm / I I II BATorn I I COKE f.YT1EA I II � II � II Q I I I I I I I I II II II II I It MsXH I& I • ?s+'' 4 I Blli I SSE DETAIL SEE DETAIL 183.7 30' ' 1 I 1 I 1 li - _ _ _ - •.A WrXTiLLLARWO I I - rwo I ®: a� J i ICDOB OR ABOVE �� W. P A R K I N G SOUTHDALE "; _I „, DECK al YMCA • _ ' Lr T0r l DECI ELEV 8- 7- 00 00 -8 ioi - V FFE =870.0 - LLE 858.00 I MOOR ABOVE 1eA - •A �: 107' i 14 p� -LM OP i T ROOK ABOVE I e•caaaaTE - I SCCWALIt -71P � C • 1 8L DRAL 'dew � w ]T 1Bw I 511 dIBB @ m ioA 14 car" -� SUE DETAIL �CONBECIION nl IM a —_ r ... .... ._. ... -.. _ .. ... ._. :J I o ° C t' __ ' - I ]ll'R - 7a� DROP -orr "' N, B 74 th ^ I COMMONBO D I wt FE t-1 -TYP � FFE =870.00 L n — — 1 ._ ____ __ _______ __ _il -__ ______________---_-----_-1°- 1 I� I I V31 ! I • BETABI10 se9sevav 3117. ' P WALL 74th St. W I WON I I — �I �'g IkIX / BC7 QA1B k * I I L t•A �' 080913oZ WALL e3Ln } $ RO ARP J I I ,. � ''�L .I ^ I / e o - - - - --* -- -- - - - - - -- a cline k 6•�� .1 I I � I �' i SEE LTNL lu ew _ V ti 4118. e'ca9aErz - I ' _ s�etAIA -Tw II BATorn I I COKE f.YT1EA I II � II � II Q I I I I I I I I II II II II I It MsXH I& I • ?s+'' 4 I Blli I SSE DETAIL SEE DETAIL 183.7 30' ' 1 I 1 I 1 li - _ _ _ - •.A WrXTiLLLARWO I I - rwo I ®: a� J i ICDOB OR ABOVE �� W. P A R K I N G SOUTHDALE "; _I „, DECK al YMCA • _ ' Lr T0r l DECI ELEV 8- 7- 00 00 -8 ioi - V FFE =870.0 - LLE 858.00 I MOOR ABOVE 1eA - •A �: 107' i 14 p� -LM OP i T ROOK ABOVE I e•caaaaTE - I SCCWALIt -71P � C • 1 8L DRAL 'dew � w ]T 1Bw I 511 dIBB @ m ioA 14 car" -� SUE DETAIL �CONBECIION nl IM a —_ r ... .... ._. ... -.. _ .. ... ._. :J I o ° C t' __ ' - I ]ll'R - 7a� DROP -orr "' N, B 74 th ^ I COMMONBO D I wt FE t-1 -TYP � FFE =870.00 L n — — 1 ._ ____ __ _______ __ _il -__ ______________---_-----_-1°- 1 I� I I V31 ! I • BETABI10 se9sevav 3117. ' P WALL 74th St. W I WON VVII Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project View at York Avenue from West .4 BWBR Archiwts Ih ,V Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project e from Northwest If Southdale YMCA, Mixed-Use Facility Project I> View at York Avenue from Southwest r } Aerial View at Ydrk Avenue from West Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project Vvy Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project View from East frrisllfl 44" ISouthdale YMCA, Mixed-Use Facility Project .'y YSouthdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project ., View at Xerxes Avenue from Southeast Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project Y View at Xerxes Avenue from Northeast ,� ■ v 14V sir 61124 all r A ,,. a v .w.�swu 1 SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING own \B W HBO R wm- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ]�A D E;;m EMAT 0N8 - COWd•d• Mum 520 �:q..�. nset A.anuv n Slo ELEVATION A - COMMON BOND Ni .T - -r F�7 ri Pt I�ft 1]�A �9 SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING MGMw BWBR ARCHITECTS m �7fA NME NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OB- ff -11m NB ]f1YtlpEI.BO 6 EIliF1VOR SIVATKm . COM ONBW NOLKW 521 r�Yd^ BdBe AnAan. HE 1111 man n Slo ELEVATION A - COMMON BOND Ni .T - -r F�7 ri Pt I�ft 1]�A �9 SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING MGMw BWBR ARCHITECTS m �7fA NME NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OB- ff -11m NB ]f1YtlpEI.BO 6 EIliF1VOR SIVATKm . COM ONBW NOLKW 521 r�Yd^ BdBe AnAan. I� !I! MEN i■ ■ �• ELEVATION (30-�OTH'ILEVATM— YMCA BUILDING d I I Y M C • SOUTHDALE YMCA and BK s.wr i. wn ssloz.lwe AiI II3�Al M art: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �nmm ae 1ID01d1m n EnE OR ELEVATOM - YMOA MMMS 510 �-, i o� I� �i ..� Ifto �c NORTH SOUTH BUIIDIN 511 ,F . ,a @ yy. iy WILDING SECTION - YMCA BUILDING SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND B s'1D..gn.t~iri�swn+� u�mnm , NGIL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 }�A1M JM lam V BULM YMCA eu.= 511 fgwryPu Pc'Pl A..�mn Face Brick VSouthdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project Architectural Pre -cast Concrete i Architectural Pre - finished Metal Panel Material Palette I I �I I I• I I I I e • � I I I i I (Q 7% I I I I 91 'k I I I I If li stW I 11II r _ I I I I I YMCA and COMMONBONO HOUSING MM& MN A 1 C S A%OtIATES SW V� /II9! 16 arm Im.rn` E7�INR�IIQB REF _ LEGEND 00 v.0 O _ •� °� 2 wry 1 ECEEIIVEO AUG 1 9 1008 w�r�.u.r.4w �Wn�weti/�au.5 m.�r® N it m���a 4�mIN.IrtY�IrD nLV mtm6YOWMn oleuti.lrlYf .II.Mr_i�o�4.�i1.uw_mll. w.eryee.r Tm RlJ1 IrG1Y.O w._m•e I.�r. .rgm.l. Iny.�r_ onlc. av I> a6a.vm. 1 r.� Gopher State Or e Call WARNING: TMrm.unanw.uurosou w.ulr. rn rou.veo.0 YMCA and COMMONBONO HOUSING MM& MN A 1 C S A%OtIATES SW V� /II9! 16 arm Im.rn` E7�INR�IIQB REF ------ — — --------- Main Campus Entrance — — — — — — — j York Avenue Southdale YMCA, Mixed-Use Facility Project 'J 211 VAM '0" SL OF > T I Xerxes Avenue Site Plan I I I I lei I I I I I I L 1�-------- - --- - -- M awe .W � L TM ca, ®Nui vaT b 1 Ylsul ♦ Sw wX 6 Ivy tlP =Y 6 fJ® r (!r A �N 6 •�drM 1� 6 ®Q ea i6 CabY Oa PW a� n sa A, v.a � mr sm N w, r 0 WARNING: THE CONTRACT(% rXfST94G urlme MABOAIMNG TH THE CONTRALTO AT (LAST IB IiOUI WIRES, CABLES, O STRUCTURES BET( THE ABOVE WHET OWNTI. D R a �1 a} GENERAL NOTES: LANDSCAPE NOTES: %d—"'° 1 i.. i... . --m ud .dA9V� E WNREM TREE MNNJG DETAIL �....' fwu�°n,w''rria mnronarr resr ortm.Nnmeo rourRaronurrrc nmmrounnmmrmr �vvrrdmlwumnwr w ®oem. riuur- r ® ->ffve urnrxrruat -mvrc mocwrmu.mv¢ marm- merorux nxrxmt.ma¢ I I I asuc�aamm I l SHRUB PUNTING DETAIL . „� LANDSCAPE PLAN: mm -mum ma rnm.mnw rrarmemnraN nnrnRCSm -mrrm . �wr�muius II —II � wwnac 2 LD Q 9 1 PERENNIAL PUNTING DR r... LANDSCAPE DETAILS: 'a6�ra.y.dO...g T1as 1,bfirilmrd4wbWTreev .. - - .. . rtr' iw TREE REQUIREMENTS i/w.'o`ay') nrrrwmmuvrcar ur O i�de rwwmmccuuwwrimM aaa✓a.a.o'u.r LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: — I �SI :J,�'. -r y� rrnrwm.rur uamim _ rwwoo w w.rw..0 iuu�m .a mra.r O I I a.vsp ma I I � I ,I I' I� I I I I I I I I I I m I e I e3 E rr r rr Ir r II II - -- — - -- L_TT - - -- - - - N - --- - -- - - -- -- -- — — — ^- — I I 1 I . (r--------- - - - --i T I II �z I I I I I� I se) s I � I� I I � I I I I_ -- Am 8t w I F -- � I I ' I I I . I _ Tz z i m[nu+�nu woiu Gopher State O� ®Call WARNING: I and MMMONBOND HOUSING ''MM&' IM /�lil•]Q� �m w ASSOCIA�.s aa>m ramp 200.108 WIN N, iemo, - NrW RM Im4m ouv 9 �IYR[ Nmonumoo Noi ION alol � � MIIDIR Iq � �41�9N1 A W[ IM DMSOOH amouNogw Pug _v3gu - ® UU1 WWI Nnd Sus I uauwn. `/ .0'o l �fl 1 II' III Y tm 1 d I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I ------------- ---------------------------------- ----- - - - - -- - ----------------------------- - - - - -- IL U ® I SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN MR PIANNNLS Tr r � _ -rte /'/ � � �••�- 1 1 1 1 1 I „ 1 1 1 1 wQ _ ill ICI III III IE ill ill ill .II i Imo,_ I' s p I I CONNON BONN HOUSING _ - - -1 II------ ------ ------- -� ® .fir mac +sa' mr.�r- mmmiiu ®o. AUG 2 9 o s1.w and COMONBOND HOUSMG B�W�B R —_ M 'tea �,m o LM PNWER 200.AS .1 y I I . t• I � I rl I I _ I II EIS «- I rr rr rl i II Tn + +--------------- - - - - -- r Tom• -------- - - - -I— -- i —r —te T I I Iz I I LI I Ili � I I Tee, & w a I I I I I i s pie 19 lone Gopher State One Call WARNING: w�uuecxyinunowau. x .mmaavuww ..uur�.ua.�.i mu rirv� w.oiu.'�'.oawm� o uwi nsno�uu�i u,.w® M mmw�u �iav®i¢im ,�,uuma a ti<vavmoro aoai uaueaoomeme'�i�ionwx�rromsrrom, IMUR and AMONBOND HOUSING wk wo V 1tl4 M1m f�4Si® ASSOM7E5 mm ua� al�aunmu� uux,� nur 200.CG all, ar w F o I "t". 0 1 - No I I #4C% Gopher State Oqe Call WARNING: nwuuum,xuurmru., .. 99m9m9m9m and COMMONBOND HOUSING M Im R IMM UnMKAII- wm ffmm 200.cu I I - -I I I .I I I I I I B B ,S ui rr rr rr � rr II r • ;sue. �.,r:�..: -- - :�� -` I I I I �ml I' I�$ I I I I I I I I L I s I— I I I I slam a.T[P PaullrPm PP[YanWl eux tsevrP) -19 T flNa: PEaPRFP YYx1fP..a: ' Cnpher State One Call wnvrnnc lmut% and MMONBOND HOUSING EM M em wy.m ssimna ASSOCIA76 — szrcP— m � —nom gym:: - BIM MIlON A 200.$W 11 I - -I I �Iurl I I�al ' � I I� I I I I I I , To & w r -- I I I I YOYf9 � v and COMMONBOND _ 0 HOUSING m k YN ummeuwonaw woos ASSOCIATES �y,j � �^C nt -ZZ A.k —C 2 3 1 loos 19 u - t - ® Goph"er State One Call iaomm M.a— WARNING: WAIEKW ne mmua�,M uuavem.nwYacw�sc1uiouiwxro.0 wuLmon.A muLYRmcmxasw w�inu`•.awc uYS'u�n wm�a.moum+oura nemnuno .aw�mrticram�Y.nenosc�u�vn�.s.® • un.xmx.mrxaiunYU:nTmnv.YU»o�Yn mrnn4 m, rwan.wvo d an n Yam LVf]/rI.t/�/� U �nuYn. w.x ouu0o 11Y pgnunu YUUxwism NLY] umcmmYaown wmn w.w . o,�seoa.er_ TLS �i -I m • �_ ' 11111 �II i O u r o — © o ° i [ 1' e , i d ul �� R 31 Ei �3 e, Pei i o �{I I III IIII I� I YBOCA and MOMO D HOUSMO mmA. em 2 EFIVF0 2 9 2009 Cez ®�L•vm NOT FOR MRSIRUMON e fFD -tom Y s>ms,m a FHOR FLOOR RAN - YM R XUM 401.1FL owa,e, evea�.wm NINE I YBOCA and MOMO D HOUSMO mmA. em 2 EFIVF0 2 9 2009 Cez ®�L•vm NOT FOR MRSIRUMON e fFD -tom Y s>ms,m a FHOR FLOOR RAN - YM R XUM 401.1FL owa,e, evea�.wm an +1 e3 '! 117j, ,o - 11 yr. M M O n p F1008 PLAN 19 0 W and OMONBOND HOUSING �r NOT FOR corsnurnoN 421.3FL fy,;/spOplAdbu ii ..,. 0 0 O 0 u I -" iR - ana AMOMB0ND HOUSING N11C NOT FOR rnNSTRUCOON NEYPUN �am,m v TNRD FLOM PUN AND FO19RN FLOOR PUN 423.3FL I - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- _-�-� 1-0 and • COMMONBOND HOUBWO E+W i I j j. j � I � • �� Ra ED AUG 2 9 2008 I I II I I N j NOT FOR -i - -- CONSO7 WON KEYFLAN I I I I I I aim n YMrA� 8 O -4 500 �a r + r + • r ceo,a�m.e�nedrs I �- — - - - — - — - — - — r — -- -,- -- I I. II I I I I II I I II I I • 1 I ii ii I IDR PIAII - YNG B`I�OINC I FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES C) o YQ9CA and MORBOND Housma EM IM m � �nr��iusi a�m�w r -. 1!7 AUG q 7^11 i s� �� rw MEMEW Lcaa-n NOT FOR CONSTRUMON KEYPLAN a 3A®IIID M-CM FLOOR RAN - YNOA DLLM 402.1FL r�— OEM- �EM m E =EMMMEM miamm jumm ®la NINE MEMEW Lcaa-n NOT FOR CONSTRUMON KEYPLAN a 3A®IIID M-CM FLOOR RAN - YNOA DLLM 402.1FL r�— t I 9 I I , rte: �•`��:. `MW IiI I Mi f - I - m DING I and COMMONBONO HOUSING FUM PUN KM WU 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 mein we r —�az�i sE�B RA, AUG 2 9 2999 �M1 o NOT MR CONSTRUCRON m r �e -ts-a +o/om »uo v IAVYEII LM FLOM PUN - YMCA BUL MO 400AFL G.pdLU¢nnW� =moo =moo A--� ©� m ram� O v ." mein we r —�az�i sE�B RA, AUG 2 9 2999 �M1 o NOT MR CONSTRUCRON m r �e -ts-a +o/om »uo v IAVYEII LM FLOM PUN - YMCA BUL MO 400AFL G.pdLU¢nnW� I EVEL FLODIR PIM - BECK mmwua m -- I " --4ci— and jWOHeOHD HOUSING �m e L ;ffi LUM ROM PLAN PAFIW CM WEM-1 a MEM logo mmwua m -- I " --4ci— and jWOHeOHD HOUSING �m e L ;ffi LUM ROM PLAN PAFIW CM ej OOR PLM - .a w.,. Pei , un and COMMOMBOHD HOUSNO liClL% 0 BW r PUL,Yl lflm 9Y tlImJ1N � 00_Ii1 � MIE NOT FOR CONSfRUMN �m v RBT Fi0M PLAN - PARIQM D EX 411.2FL 4W&—. good and COMMOMBOHD HOUSNO liClL% 0 BW r PUL,Yl lflm 9Y tlImJ1N � 00_Ii1 � MIE NOT FOR CONSfRUMN �m v RBT Fi0M PLAN - PARIQM D EX 411.2FL 4W&—. I 5% DOWN SLOPE i 3 I "22 I . OPEN FACE 1 I 19 15 I I SOUTHDALE YMCA 6 I I I w 1 I 36 I om =Opus= I I I 21 I j 5X DOWN SLOPE (one way) I I 17 I COMMON BOND HOUSING I I I I -- I -J SECOND TIER - AS SUBMITTED • NO SCALE QN� 331 SPACES TOTAL AT YMCA. 120 SPACES TOTAL AT COMMON BOND SECOND TIER RAMP= 39,450 SF. - -i I- 4 -2-65- , 5% DOWN SLOPE I 22 11 OPEN FACE I LLIE411TI I I I I'l.1 I I I I I I I 1 1 4 I I 34 i JTHDALE YMCA t ® ® I I I I 34 �e.y I ' �� I I I I I I 21 I � I I I ' I I ' I I 54 DOWN SLOPE (one way) I I 17 I ® I iRltiSH I I I i I � I I COMMON BOND HOUSING I I m 14 -- — — — — — — — — — — -� RAMP EXPANSION - SECOND TIER • NO SCALE N 427 SPACES TOTAL AT YMCA 120 SPACES TOTAL AT COMMON BOND SECOND TIER RAMP= 39,450 SF #T 5% DOWN SLOPE I I I-LLLLf] I OPEN FACE 19 I 19 I U_ I 28 SOUTHDALE YMCA o is CL v I 111 SPACES 9 � I 9 i5 o I lz 28 ° I I 2 I 19 W7777777777777771 I I ® Fu Im I I COMMON BOND HOUSING I lh-� ------ I -I I RAMP EXPANSION - TOP TIER NO SCALE 427 SPACES TOTAL AT YMCA 120 SPACES TOTAL AT COMMON BOND THIRD TIER RAMP= 39,450 SF A +h- �o - �5 Tt�f (c� 00-HO suJOEtT S %YE W Cas.) —WALKER E(_dE)k Sv ITES C4) yob Ki-ow �j o0 - _j Yp K CQC-NOR�pS1+ m C3 y Corgs;C!- O:;ISG5227S C ) Z UNITS PER ltCRE p . 101311 Southdale YMCA, Mixed-Use Facility Project 111111IC" Southdale YMCA, Mixed -Use Facility Project Facing West - from Xerxes Facing Southwest Ml- Facing Southeast AFWjjjjj� 8 �• � T « r a v L4�*^� �, on Facing West Printed 12/09/08 Calls for Service Damage to Property Telephone Threats Domestic Assault & Verbal Controlled Substances Warrant arrest Burglary Theft Forgery Unwanted guest Tress ass Public Indecent Gun Call Assist other agency Assault Terroristic Threats Violation of OFP Interfere w/ call 911 Recovered Vehicle Suspected Abuse False Info to Police Illegal Consumption DWI Missing Person Found Person Party Call Death Investigation Kid Call Juvenile runaway Lost Property Attempt to Locate Found Property Fire Alarm Fire:all other Medical Emergency Misc. Public Suspicious Vehicle/ person 911 follow-up calls DURe istration violations Accident Animal lost or found Welfare check Hazmat - Gas Parking complaints Motorist Assist Vehicle Lockout Attempt to Locate Disturbance TOTAL CALLS Summary of Call for Service Yorkdale MMMMMM 0�MMMM� 0000 ©00 000�0�0 ©0000 �_ ©0000 Om ®0 ®0� Immm000� m00000� 4ya� 0 0 0 a_ 0 m 0 MEMORANDUM — Plan Review `'•f,� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: September 24, 2008 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Southdale YMCA & Commonbond Housing 7355 York Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and draft minutes from the September 18, 2008 ETC meeting. • A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. This should include all stop signs, one -way signs, HC parking signs, compact parking signs, etc. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. • All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. • A development agreement will be required for public watermain and sanitary sewer mains installed to accommodate the two buildings. Sheet — 200.CS: 1. Need to show parking lot signage. See note above. Sheet — 200.CU: 1. Add storm water treatment structures prior to any storm water entering the perforated storm sewer pipes. Sheet — 201.CU: 1. Show 20 -foot utility easement over public watermain and public sanitary sewer. Indicate on plans "Public" portions of both the watermain and the sanitary sewer. 2. Show 20 -foot utility easement over the sanitary sewer service from the Commonbond building to MH -1. 3. All "Public" utilities must abide by the City of Edina Specifications for Water Mains and Sewers. Sheet — 200.CD: 1: Use City of Edina Standard Details for all "public" items. These can be downloaded at: hftp://www.citvofedina.com/Departments/Construction Standards Contract Specifications. htmn. Sheet — 201.CD: 1. Use City of Edina Standard Details for all "public" items. These can be downloaded at: hftp://www.citvofedina.com/Departments/Construction Standards Contract Specifications. htmn. This is the first re- review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks Asa GAEng1needng\Generalt60 - 69 Streets\3101 West 69th Street Developement\20060522 review of York Place.doc `i Hennepin County Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 -5421 August 26, 2008 Mr. John Donovan, P.E. Loucks and Assoc. 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 RE: Edina YMCA, CSAH 31 (York Avenue South) Dear John: 612 -596 -0300, Phone 763 - 478 -4000, FAX 763 - 478 -4030, TDD www.hennepin.us ReC'c�f 'vl�fl L 8yLoucksgSsO c. The latest site plan, dated 8- 25 -08, demonstrating the revised driveway and median island on County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 31 is acceptable. However, the radii at the southerly right -iii/ right -out driveway and the south radius at the main entrance should be increased to 20 feet to ease turning vehicle moves at these approaches. Please revise these dimensions prior to formal permitting. We also suggest the egress lanes at the main entrance be 11 feet wide and ingress be 14 feet, again to ease vehicle moves. Please call me at 612 -596 -0355; with any further questions or discussion. Sincerely, David K. Zetterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator cc: Plat Review Committee Wayne Houle, Edina City Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer A S P Recycled Paper Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. a. M REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: IV. a. From: Jack Sullivan, PE ACTION: Assistant City Engineer ® Recommendation /Motion Date: September 18, 2008 ® Discussion Subject: Transportation ❑ Information Impact Analysis — 7355 York Avenue — Southdale YMCA and Commonbound Housing - REVISED -Sept. 18,2008 Recommendation: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated August 29, 2008 and follow up memo dated September 17, 2008. Staff and WSB believe that the memo addresses all the concerns. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that traffic generated from the proposed 7355 York Avenue does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system; with the following conditions: 1. The Development will be responsible for improvements to the infrastructure at the median nose of York Avenue and the north entrance /exit. Info /Background: Staff received a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) on August 29, 2008 for the construction of a new 72,000 sq ft YMCA facility immediately west of the existing facility. The building would be built in the parking lot of the current facility. Once the new YMCA building opens then a 130 unit multi - family building would be built on the site of the razed YMCA building. The final build out for both buildings would be in 2011 or 2012. K44- G:\Engineering\ln&astructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Convnission\Agendas\ 2008 R& R\ 200809118_Revised_20080918_7355 York doe Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. a. Staffs initial review of the TIA and recommendation to the ETC at the time of submission the ETC Packets (on September 11, 2008) is shown in the following: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated August 29, 2008 and review a memo dated September 9, 2008 from WSB and Associates. Currently staff and our traffic consultant WSB feel that this transportation submittal is not yet complete. Staff, WSB and Spack Consulting are working to resolve the outstanding items listed in the attached memo prior to the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on September 18, 2008. Currently the conditions of the approval are: 1. This development shall address all comments in WSB's September 9, 2008 memo to the satisfaction of the ETC and Engineering Department. 2. Improved site plan showing mitigation measures to the site, including new extended right turn lane. Therefore staff is withholding a recommendation on this project pending the resolution of the outstanding issues. G:\Engineering\Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\200809118 Revised_20080918_7355 York.doc Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item Iii. a. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORTIRECOMM ENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: IV. a. From: Jack Sullivan, PE . 7 ACTION: Assistant City Eroneer ® Recommendation /Motion Date: September 18, 2008 ® Discussion Subject: Transportation ❑ Information Impact Analysis 7355 York Avenue — Southdale YMCA and Commonbound Housing Recommendation: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated August 29, 2008 and review a memo dated September 9, 2008 from WSB and Associates. Currently staff and our traffic consultant WSB feel that this transportation submittal is not .yet complete. Staff, WSB and Spack Consulting are working to resolve the outstanding items listed in the attached memo prior to the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on September 18, 2008. Currently the conditions of the approval are: 1. This development shall address all comments in WSB's September 9, 2008 memo to the satisfaction of the ETC and Engineering Department. 2. Improved site plan showing mitigation measures to the site, including new extended right turn lane. Therefore staff is withholding a recommendation on this project pending the resolution of the outstanding issues. hS� G:\Engineerin&fiwtructure`Stwts \Traffic \Transportation ComrmssionWgendas \2008 R&R\200809118 7355 York.doc Page 2 of I Edina Transportation Commission Info /Background; Item N. a Staff received'a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) on August 29, 2008 for the construction of a new 72.000 sq ft YMCA facility immediately west of the existing - facility: The building would be built in the parking lot of the current facility. Once the new YMCA building opens then a 130 unit multi - family building would be built on the site of the razed YMCA building. The final build out.for both, buildings would .be in 2011 or 2012. hs-� G:\Engineerin&fmstructum \Streets \Tmfflc \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\200809118 7355 York.doc AL WSO - Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South a Awactwes. I— Suite 0300 Minneapolis. MN 55416 Tel: 763 5414=0 Fax: 763 5414700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart,PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: September 9, 2008 Re: Southdale YMCA Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686-02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for the proposed Southdale YMCA Redevelopment The proposed redevelopment is located on the east side of York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue. The proposed redevelopment includes: • Removing the existing 70,000 SF building and replacing it with a new 72,000 SF building. • Addition of a 130 unit Multi- Family building • Replacing the existing 337.parldng spaces with 326 parking spaces Based on our review of the Southdale YMCA Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study, the following questions and comments are made. 1. A figure should be provided showing the studied intersections in relationship to the proposed site. 2. Although the Executive Summary discusses the intersections and driveways analyzed it should also be included in Section 2, Proposed Development and Study Area. In addition a discussion on the existing and proposed access locations and geometry should be provided. I am assuming that the proposed locations do not change and the existing geometry is proposed not to change. A figure showing the existing site access and circulation with respect to the proposal should be provided. 3. Traffic counts were conducted during the AM Peak, PM Peak and Saturday Peak. How was it determined that the Saturday late AM was the peak period? a:WmSbcerbs'Mme.nvscAnss York Ave -YMC %Tm&staOy%m O_u&owc- WOMYMC&aa L T7 a Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 2 of 2 4. A figure showing the location of the existing parking should be provided. The analysis shows that only 177 spaces are used on an average day. Are there events that require additional parking? The parking need should be based on a peak event. 5. Figure 3.4 should be updated to show all of the side street Stop signs. 6. Section 4, Projected Traffic indicates that the assumptions in the section were reviewed with City Staff. This is true in some cases but not all. ® It is indicated that the Directional Orientation is based on a weighted distribution. This should be explained. o The Cities model was not used for the analysis. This was OK'd in this case because of the intersection being analyzed were not all in the Cities model. They will be added should the development get approved. o The background traffic assumed a less then 1% per year growth rate based on the MnDOT State Aid projection factor. This is acceptable however other adjacent development should also be included in the projections (i.e. Westin, 69'' and York, etc) 7. The analysis results indicate that the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue with the North Site entrance will have some movements at unsatisfactory Levels of Service. • The overall Level of Service at the North Site entrance will be at a LOS D with the westbound movement at LOS F. With the additional traffic associated with the adjacent developments this should be closely looked at again. • The queuing analysis only looked at the PM Peak hour. The traffic volume exiting the North Site entrance is higher in the AM Peak. To insure that the queues and storage lengths are adequate the AM Peak should also be analyzed at both intersections. o The mitigation, based on the queuing analysis, is to add a westbound right turn lane at the North Site entrance. A mitigation analysis should be provided showing the LOS and queuing results with the addition of this lane. Also a figure should be provided showing that the right turn lane can be accomplished on the site. 8. As discussed previously, the parking analysis should look at a peak event for the YMCA. Providing a proposed 326 spaces, 11 less then today, is a concern. A shared parking analysis should also be conducted to determine exactly how parking demand there truly will be on site. 9. The study discusses the use, and availability of transit for the YMCA site. It should be expanded to include, how people at the YMCA and get to the transit facilities. Are sidewalks provided / available? A detailed site plan should be provided. Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the traffic impact study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. Ar f QTn&eermgG=ranY SMM655 York Ave - YMCA1Tnfe SMdy*MM0- wh=Ic4 9 M YMCAdm S-ack pTRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Memorandum To: Jack Sullivan, P.E. From: Mike Spack, P.E. Date: 9/17/2008 Re: Southdale YMCA Redevelopment — Traffic Study Comment Response This memo responds to your email dated September 11, 2008 and Chuck Rickart's memo dated September 9, 2008. It also answers questions from our September 15, 2008 meeting. Comments are italicized and responses are in normal text. Sullivan Comments Can you address the parking situation during the building of the new YMCA? Approximately 240 parking stalls will be provided throughout construction on the northeast and east sides of the parcel. The report is lacking a good quality site plan. See attached graphic. Rickart Comments 1. A figure should be provided showing the studied intersections in relationship to the proposed site. See Attached. 2. Although the Executive Summary discusses the intersections and driveways analyzed it should also be included in Section 2, Proposed Development and Study Area. In addition a discussion on the existing and proposed access locations and geometry should be provided. 1 am assuming that the proposed locations do not change and the existing geometry is proposed not to change. A figure showing the existing site access and circulation with respect to the proposal should be provided. The study intersections are shown on the attached graphic. The overall site plan is also attached with a site plan that shows the existing and proposed buildings overlaid. Minor changes are proposed to the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection. All of.the other study intersections will be unchanged. The changes to the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection (see attached intersection plan): • The YMCA driveway is being shifted approximately thirty feet to the north to accommodate the new building. The nose of the median on the north side of York Avenue is being moved to the north and the southbound to eastbound left turn lane is being extended. YMNCA Redevelopment 2 of 4 Jack Sullivan, PE Traffic Analysis Response A 150 foot westbound to northbound right turn, lane was recommended for the YMCA north driveway in addition to a shared through /left lane. Per the attached intersection plan, it is only possible to provide a 40 foot westbound to northbound right turn lane was. This configuration was modeled in SimTraffic for the 2012 Build p.m. peak hour (worst case scenario) and the output report is attached. With the 40 foot turn lane the overall intersection is predicted to have 3.0 seconds /vehicle of delay, the westbound though /left lane will have 42.2 seconds /delay, and the maximum westbound queue is predicted to be 138 feet (six vehicles).. There is approximately 270 feet of storage on the westbound approach before vehicles would start backing up into the parking lot, so the.queuing will not impact the parking lot operations. 3. Traffic counts were conducted during. the AM Peak, PM Peak. and Saturday Peak. How was it determined that the Saturday late AM was the peak period? The YMCA classes have the heaviest attendance during the morning on Saturdays. Since the traffic patterns in the area are most impacted by the shopping district, it is believed the late AM period has the heaviest combination of site traffic and background traffic. 4. A figure showing the location of the existing parking should be provided. The analysis shows that only 177 spaces are used on an average day. Are there events that require additional parking? The parking need should be based on a peak event. The attached site plan shows the general parking arrangement. 454 parking stalls will be provided on the site. 130 stalls (85 in the building and 45 in the outdoor parking area) will be provided for the Common Bond residential building. 324 spaces will be provided for the YMCA, which is believed to provide an adequate safety factor over the 177 spaces of peak demand that were observed. 5. Figure 3.4 should be updated to show all of the side street Stop signs. Figure 3.4 shows the stop signs that physically exist, although all driveways are legally stop condition. 6. Section 4, Projected Traffic indicates that the assumptions in the section were reviewed with City Staff. This is true in some cases but not all. It is indicated that the Directional Orientation is based on a weighted distribution. This should be explained. The daily traffic volume on each road segment was divided by the sum of the daily traffic volumes on the road segments to develop the directional orientation. o The Cities model was not used for the analysis. This was OK'd in this case because of the intersection being analyzed were not all in the Cities model. They will be added should the development get approved. Rickart to address, per meeting. The project's synchro files will be provided. The background traffic assumed a less then I% per year growth rate based on the MnDOT State Aid projection factor. This is YMNCA Redevelopment 3 of 4 Jack Sullivan, PE Traffic Analysis Response acceptable however other adjacent develo,Pment should also be included in the projections (i.e. Westin, 69' and York, etc) Rickart will add into city Synchro model, per meeting. T. The analysis results indicate that the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue with the North Site entrance will have some movements -at unsatisfactory Levels of Service. • The overall Level of Service at the North Site entrance will be at a LOS D with the westbound movement at LOS F. With the additional traffic associated with the adjacent developments this should be closely looked at again. Rickart will add into city Synchro model, per meeting. Per our meeting, safety could become a concern at the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection if the gaps in York Avenue traffic become too short for safe egress. The Mn /DOT crash database was reviewed (with the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool). From January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2006 there was one crash at the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection. It occurred on December 2, 2002 and was a right angle crash between eastbound and southbound vehicles. The only crash at the intersection was with the driveway traffic on the east side of the road, not the YMCA driveway. • The queuing analysis only looked at the PM Peak hour. The traffic volume exiting the North Site entrance is higher in the AM Peak. To insure that the queues and storage lengths are adequate the AM Peak should also be analyzed at both intersections. See attached table. All of the queues will be contained within the provided turn lanes. • The mitigation, based on the queuing analysis, is to add a westbound right turn lane at the North Site entrance. A mitigation analysis should be provided showing the LOS and queuing results with the addition of this lane. Also a figure should be provided showing that the right turn lane can be accomplished on the site. A 150 foot westbound to northbound right turn lane was recommended for the YMCA north driveway in addition to a shared through /left lane. Per the attached intersection plan, it is only possible to provide a 40 foot westbound to northbound right turn lane was. This configuration was modeled in SimTraffic for the 2012 Build p.m. peak hour (worst case scenario) and the output report is attached. With the 40 foot turn lane the overall intersection is predicted to have 3.0 seconds /vehicle of delay, the westbound lane will have 42.2 seconds /delay, and the maximum westbound queue is predicted to be 138 feet (six vehicles). There is approximately 270 feet of storage on the westbound approach before vehicles would start backing up into the parking lot. See the attached figures for the site plans. 8. As discussed previously, the parking analysis should look at a peak event for the YMCA. Providing a proposed 326 spaces, 11 less then today, is a concern. A shared parking analysis should also be conducted to determine exactly how much parking demand there truly will be on site. The parking analysis in the Traffic Impact Study showed a shared need of 326 spaces. 454 parking stalls will be provided on the site. 130 stalls (85 in the building J YMNCA Redevelopment 4 of 4 Jack Sullivan, PE Traffic Analysis Response and 45 in the outdoor parking area) will be provided for the Common Bond residential building. 324 spaces will be provided for the YMCA, which is believed to provide an adequate safety factor over the 177 spaces of peak demand that were observed. 9. The study discusses the use and availability of transit for the YMCA site. It should be expanded to include, how people at the YMCA and get to the transit facilities. Are sidewalks provided / available? A detailed site plan should be provided. The attached graphic shows the locations of the bus stops on York Avenue in front of the YMCA. The sidewalk and trail system is also shown on the graphic, including the York Avenue underpass north of the site. Asg� L A Proposed Study Intersections 0 = Study intersection 0 > 01, _* 114th St I& all$ hi--- "I Parklawn 0 F7*7 4 North No Scale YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN WBT WBR SimTraffic Performance Report 2012 PM Build Peak Hour- MITIGATE 'NBR All 9/15/2008 1: Traffic Circle NW & York Ave South Performance by movement 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Delay / Veh (s) 10.4 3.8 Movement EBR 0.0 0.5 Stop Delay (hr) Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.4 Delay / Veh (s) 6.4 7.6 11.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 Stop Delay.(hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 St DelNeh (s) 6.5 6.3 9.6 0.3 0.8 0.8 Total Stops 17 21 17 87 7 149 StopNeh 1.00 0.68 0.94 0.09 0.23 0.14 Travel Dist.(mi) 0.7 0.9 0.5 73.7 2.3 78.1 Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.6 0.1 4.0 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Traffic Circle NE & York Avenue South Performance by movement Movement - WBT WBR NBL NBT 'NBR All Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Delay / Veh (s) 10.4 3.8 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.5 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 St DeNeh (s) 7.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Stops 11 12 0 0 0 23 StopNeh 1.10 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Travel Dist (mi) 0.6 0.7 1.2 31.6 0.4 34.6 Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 1.2 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 3: Traffic Circle SW & York Ave South Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR SBL SBT SBR All Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.6 Delay / Veh (s) 23.1 14.9 1.4 1.0 0.1 1.9 Stop Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 St DelNeh (s) 21.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total Stops 31 23 1 1 0 56 StopNeh 0.97 1.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.05 Travel Dist (mi) 1.4 1.0 2.6 32.9 1.5 39.4 Travel Time (hr) 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.2 0.1 1.9 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 roi psi+ YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN EBL , SimTraffic Performance Report 2012 PM Build Peak Hour - MITIGATE NBL . 9/15/2008 4: Traffic Circle SE & York Avenue South Performance by movement SBL SBT SBR. All Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.7 iNlovement .0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 Delay / Veh (s) 1.9 -8.8 0.3 0.0 0.6 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 St DeVVeh (s) 0.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Stops 4 25 0 0 29 Stop/Veh 0.06 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.03 Travel Dist (mi) 1.9 0.9 28.1 0.3 31.1 Travel time (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 1.2 Denied Entry Before 0 0. 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 5: YMCA North Ent. & York Avenue South Performance by movement Movement_ EBL , , WBL WBR _ NBL . -N-BT, NBR SBL SBT SBR. All Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.7 0.4 .0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.7 Delay / Veh (s) 30.3 42.2 13.6 4.7 0.8 0.5 6.6 0.5 0.5 3.0 Stop Delay (hr) 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 St DelNeh (s) 29.0 40.4 12.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.4 2.2 Total Stops 11 57 98 18 0 0 82 2 2 270 StopNeh 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.18 0.14 Travel Dist (mi) 0.6 3.6 6.1 1.7 53.8 1.2 7.6 50.5 0.7 125.9 Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.8 0.7 0.1 1.8 0.1 0.7 2.6 0.0 6.8 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6: YMCA South Ent. & York Avenue South Performance by movement Movemerfi . EBR:_ -WBR NBT',,NBR 'SBT All Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 _ 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 Delay / Veh (s) 5.1 4.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.7 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.1 St DelNeh (s) 4.9 3.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total Stops 11 27 0 0 0 38 StopNeh 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Travel Dist (mi) 0.6 1.8 71.1 8.0 54.9 136.4 Travel Time (hr) 0.0 0.1 2.4 0.4 1.7 4.7 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0. 0 0 0 TD YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN SimTraffic Performance Report 2012 PM Build Peak Hour - MITIGATE 9/15/2008 7: Parklawn Ave & York Avenue South Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL� SBT- SBR All Total Delay (hr) 3.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 4.4 Delay / Veh (s) 117.1 5.1 19.9 6.1 11.9 1.5 5.7 4.7 0.5 0.4 7.9 Stop Delay (hr) 3.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 St Del/Veh (s) 116.3 5.0 19.4 6.7 9.6 0.4 4.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 7.2 Total Stops 110 93 9 12 37 0 1 6 0 1 269 StopNeh 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.00 0.09 0.60 0.00 0.01 0.13 Travel Dist (mi) 16.2 13.8 0.1 0.1 9.9 164.2 2.2 0.8 61.3 6.6 275.2 Travel Time (hr) 4.2 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.5 5.3 0.1 0.0 1.9 0.3 13.0 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11: York Avenue South & York Ave South Performance by movement Movement NBT _ SET SER All Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 Delay / Veh (s) 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 St Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Stops 0 0 5 5 StopNeh 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 63.0 0.0 33.1 96.2 Travel Time (hr) 2.1 0.0 2.0 4.1 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 15: York Avenue South & York Ave South Performance by movement Movement _ � NBT SBR Alf Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.6 0.8 Delay / Veh (s) 0.8 2.0 1.4 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 St DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.4 0.2 Total Stops 0 . 103 103 StopNeh 0.00 0.10 0.05 Travel Dist (mi) 78.8 111.3 190.1 Travel Time (hr) 2.5 5.0 7.5 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 TDI YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN SimTraffic Performance Report 2012 PM Build Peak Hour - MITIGATE 9/15/2008 Total Network Performance Total Delay (hr) 10.0 Delay / Veh (s) 14.6 Stop Delay (hr) 6.1 St DelNeh (s) 8.9 Total Stops 943 StopNeh 0.38 Travel Dist (mi) 1438.3 Travel Time (hr) 59.0 Denied Entry Before 0 Denied Entry After 0 i TDI YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN Queuing and Blocking Report. 2012 PM Build Peak Hour - MITIGATE 9/15/2008 Intersection: 1: Traffic Circle NW & York Ave South hovement _ - - - -EB WB - — -- - - - -- - - - --� Directions Served R LT Maximum Queue (ft) 36 64 Average Queue (ft) .12 24 95th Queue (ft) 35 52 Link Distance (ft) 207 87 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 24 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Traffic Circle NE & York Avenue South Movement WB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 Average Queue (ft) 9 95th Queue (ft) 25 Link Distance (ft) 301 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 74 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 6 Storage Blk Time ( %) 24 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 3: Traffic Circle SW & York Ave South Movement EB SB SB SB B13: Directions Served TR L T TR T Maximum Queue (ft) 74 13 7 11 6 Average Queue (ft) 24 0 0 1 0 95th Queue (ft) 58 6 5 8 4 Link Distance (ft) 213 135 135 135 126 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) TDI5 �jj YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN Queuing and Blocking Report 2012 PM Build Peak Hour - MITIGATE 9/15/2008 Intersection: 4: Traffic Circle SE & York Avenue South Movement EB NB NB Directions Served LT T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 72 4 3 Average Queue (ft) 21 0 0 95th Queue (ft) 58 3 2 Link Distance (ft) 73 111 111 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 33 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 115 77 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 3 59 Link Distance (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) 331 Queuing Penalty (veh) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Intersection: 5: YMCA North Ent. & York Avenue South Movement. EB WB WB NB. 32 35 . -- Directions Served LR LT R L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 44 138 74 40 4 73 Average Queue (ft) 11 50 47 13 0 33 95th Queue (ft) 36 115 77 39 3 59 Link Distance (ft) 313 331 279 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 40 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 17 6 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 3 0 Intersection: 6: YMCA South Ent. & York Avenue South Movement - EB . WB Directions Served R R Maximum Queue (ft) 32 35 Average Queue (ft) 9 19 95th Queue (ft) 32 43 Link Distance (ft) 297 348 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) TDI + ':�i K YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN SB SB —_ - -- Directions Served Queuing and Blocking Report 2012 PM Build Peak Hour - MITIGATE 7 27 Average Queue (ft) 9/15/2008 Intersection: 7: Parklawn Ave & York Avenue South 9 16 Link Distance (ft) 116 116 Upstream Blk Time ( %) jylovement Storage Bay Dist (ft) - -- Directions Served LT TR LR L L R Maximum Queue (ft) 243 158 43 57 32 9 Average Queue (ft) 118 31 11 25 5 1 95th Queue (ft) 242 96 32 50 24 6 Link Distance (ft) 776 776 3 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 150 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: York Avenue South & York Ave South Intersection: 15: York Avenue South & York Ave South Movement SB SB —_ - -- Directions Served R R Maximum Queue (ft) 7 27 Average Queue (ft) 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 9 16 Link Distance (ft) 116 116 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: York Avenue South & York Ave South Movement SB SB —_ - -- Directions Served R R Maximum Queue (ft) 63 81 Average Queue (ft) 18 35 95th Queue (ft) 53 72 Link Distance (ft) 582 582 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Nework Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 21 TDI j D li '. UmF moo LxJ. a: W C3 I-- << MATCH Ef CURB & GUTTER Cd Sheet Title INTERSECTION EXHIBIT Project YMCA SOUTHDA LE EDINA, MINNESOTA F L.p tAPPROIL L= Or OG k".mm PER 190.7' 4 tiv ASSOCIAIFIES SCALE: 1 11 =50' Drawn Date Comm. No. . Sheet No. MDC 09-16-08 Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, M4 55102-1996 Voice: 651.2223701 gTg F= 651=.8961 Copyright MR Architects LOUCKS PROJECT #: 08042 YMCA Redevelopment 2012 Build A.M. Peak Flour Stacking Results Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTrafficTM for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. S� A York Ave /Parklawn Ave York Ave /North YMCA Left 70 ft 50ft c (600 ft) (100 ft) o' Thru 70 ft 50 ft w (600 ft) (100 ft) m W Right 30 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (100 ft) Left 40 ft 110 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) Thru 40 ft 110 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) Right 40 ft 110ft (150 ft) (150 ft) Left 50 ft 30 ft (150 ft) (100 ft) o Thru Oft Oft (900 ft) (650 ft) 0 Z Right Oft (250 ft) (650 ft) Left 0 ft 60 ft (150 ft) (100 ft) = Thru Oft Oft .. (550 ft) (550 ft) U) Right 20 ft 20 ft (225 ft) (550 ft) Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTrafficTM for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. S� A YMCA Redevelopment, Edina, MN 5:00 SimTraffic Simulation. Summary 2012 PM Build Peak Hour - MITIGATE End Time 9/15/2008 Summary of All Intervals 60 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. -:2 - -- - - 3 =..- 4 . 5 Avg stun Number -- 1 Start Time 4:57 4:57 4:57 4:57 4:57 4:57 End Time 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 Total Time (min) 63 63 63 63 63 63 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 # of Recorded Intvls 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vehs Entered 2432 2513 2361 2468 2490 _ 2451 Vehs Exited 2418 2515 2370 2463 2481 2449 Starting Vehs 47 67 53 57 53 49 Ending Vehs 61 65 44 62 62 57 Denied Entry Before 0 1 1 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 Travel Distance (mi) 1416 1471 1391 1446 1468 1438 Travel Time (hr) 60.3 60.9 54.3 58.4 61.1 59.0 Total Delay (hr) 12.0 10.6 6.8 9.1 11.2 10.0 Total Stops 950 971 880 958 946 943 Fuel Used (gal) 129.4 124.7 108.7 112.9 114.8 118.1 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 4:57 End Time 5:00 Total Time (min) 3 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 6:00 Total Time (min) 60 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. stun Number =-1r--- __2a__ 3 4^ - - -- Vehs Entered 2432 2513 2361 2468 2490 2451 Vehs Exited 2418 2515 2370 2463 2481 2449 Starting Vehs 47 67 53 57 53 49 Ending Vehs 61 65 44 62 62 57 Denied Entry Before 0 1 1 0 0 0 Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 Travel Distance (mi) 1416 1471 1391 1446 1468 1438 Travel Time (hr) 60.3 60.9 54.3 58.4 61.1 59.0 Total Delay (hr) 12.0 10.6 6.8 9.1 11.2 10.0 Total Stops 950 971 880 958 946 943 Fuel Used (gal) 129.4 124.7 108.7 112.9 114.8 118.1 TDI ATi S PTHE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Traffic Imnact Stud Southdale YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. fat �iI 1'. S , P.F. I .iccntir No. 40916 10 Introduction and Summairyu000ue u000e aeo neoeooeo ....................... I! 29 . 3. 4n' 5. 6. 7. 8. po poo p000eoeoo proposed Development and Study Area 00000eooen0000eooeo aoo aoo aooe000eo � Existing Traffic Conditions ....................... o. 000eoneooeoa000aeooen00000eooe. 6 Existing 9B Traffic �i ooe oeoe0000000000eeoeooae000eo o 000000eoce000000eeoe0000. 15 ��' ®,e`Nte�N 011 ®U6 ®Vi 00000e0000000e o Traffic and improvement Analysis.......o...o o o o o e o o o o oe.a o o o o o o o e.o o e000.. 31 Conclusions000noaooeoveoeoneouonnnucuuoueennnneneoeeeecnnn eocoeeaon000nooennecnoeconoonen 35 Recommendations .......... o.... o.o .................. ............................... 36a� Appendix oec0000000aeoneooaoneeoecoocenoen000enoeoneceeneeeou eeoeeoneoonoennnnoouu000no..... 36 Figure2.1 — Location Map .........................................e..o....... ..............................4 Figure2.2 — Concept Plan ....... ......................... o...,............ ..............................5 Figure 3.1 — Existing Weekday AM Peak period Parking .. ....................e...... =..6 Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking ... o .............................6 Figure 3.3 — Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking ....................................... 9 Figure 3.4 — Existing Conditions ......... ............................... ............................010 Figure 3.5 — Existing A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .....................•...•...11 Figure 3.6 — Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic .................................................. 12 Figure 3.7 — Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic ............. .............................13 .... ............................... Figure 3.6 — Existing Daily Traffic .............................. ...14 Figure4.1 — Trip Distribution ...........................:.................. .............................16 Figure 4.2 — A.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development .........................19 Figure 4.3 — P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development .........................•20 t Figure 4.4 Saturday Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development 21 Figure 4.5 — Daily Volumes Due to Development ................... .................. Figure 4.6 — 2012 No -Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................23 Figure 4.7 — 2012 No -Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... ..............................24 Figure 4.6 — 2012 Ho -Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ............................ 25 Figure 4.9 — 2012 Ho -Build Daily Volumes ...e ..................... ................•............26 Figure 4.10 — 2012 Build A.M. Peak lour Volumes.. ..... ... .............................27 Figure 4.11 — 2012 Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........................................ 28 Figure 4.12 — 2012 Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ... ....:........................29 Figurd 4.13 — 2012 Build Daily Volumes ............................ .... „...•.......•............30 South YMCA Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study A6 Edina, MN August, 2008 Table 3.1 - Existing 2008 Level of Service (LOS) ............... ...............................7 Table 4.1 -Trip Generation .................................................. .............................17 Table 5.1 - 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) ...... ..................31 Table 5.2 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .............................31 Table 5.3 - 2012 P.M. Peak Hour Stacking Results ........... .............................33 Southdale YMCA Redevelopment ii Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study A � � August, 1008 1 o introduction and Summary ao purpose of Report and Study Ob jectives The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to redevelop and expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. They are proposing to build a 72,000 square foot YMCA next to the existing 70,000 square foot YMCA, demolish the existing YMCA, and then build. a 130 unit Multi - Family housing building on the site of the demolished YMCA. The purpose of this report is to determine if completion of this redevelopment and new development will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system. The study objectives are: I. Determine how the existing York Avenue South intersections at Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road currently operate. YMCA south ii. Determine if the existing Parklawn Avenue, entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road will operate with acceptable vehicle delays and stacking after the redevelopment & new construction is fully occupied in 2012. iii. Recommend improvements if needed. bo Executive Summary The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to redevelop and expand the existing facility located s on quare and the newa, MN. The facility currently has 70, 000 q uare facility will have 72,000 square feet. In addition, 130 Multi - Family housing units are proposed to be built adjacent to the new YMCA. The housing units will be operated by Common Bond. The site is located in Edina, MN on York Avenue South between Parklawn Avenue and the traffic circle south of Hazelton Road. Access to the site will be from two existing intersections on York Avenue South. The north intersection is a full intersection and the south intersection is a right in /right out intersection. City staff has requested a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic impacts of the redevelopment on the adjacent roadways for 2012 (when it is assumed full occupancy will occur). The intersections studied are: o York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue 1 N M Southdale YMCA Redevelopment August, Edina, M Traffic Impact Study' ® York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment . Entrance York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road The principal findings of this study are: . i. The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build And Build scenarios. ii. The York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection may experience significant vehicle stacking in the p.m. peak hour after the redevelopment. To mitigate this stacking, it is recommended the westbound approach consist of a 150 foot long exclusive right turn lane and a shared through/left lane. iii. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. .iv. Based on the parking analysis completed for the redevelopment, it is anticipated that providing 326 parking spaces for the site will be adequate. To adequately mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development, the following improvement plan is recommended: L . Construct a 150 foot right turn lane and one shared through/left turn lane on the westbound approach of the York Avenue/YMCA North Entrance intersection. ii. Construct one right turn lane on the westbound approach of the York Avenue/YMCA South Entrance intersection. iii. Control both driveways out of the redevelopment site with stop signs, while York Avenue remains free flowing. iv. Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. v. Construct at least 326 parking stalls on the site. Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 2 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study 93 August, 2008 �_. proposed osed D - - ao Site Location The proposed development site is located on York Avenue South north of Parklawn Avenue and south of the traffic circle located south of Hazelton Road in Edina, MN. See Figure 2.1 for a location map. bo Land Use and Intensity The existing YMCA is approximately 70,000 square feet. The proposed redevelopment will have a 72,000 square foot YMCA. YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. 130 new multi - family housing units will also be added to the site. Forty four of the units are assumed to be market rate, forty three will be low income, and the remaining forty three units will be handicap accessible . co concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. ¢to Development Phasing and Tuning This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2012. South We Y]V1CA Redevelopment 3 Edina, MN AN August, 2008 Traft Impact Study on ai m X01' _ ' p RAI;hVi 1 . M- WHO "t r NoME w a ji c c t •► 4 ac s THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Concept Plan YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Figure 2.2 North No Scale Concept Plan prepared for YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis by BWBR Architects. Ac 3. Existing Traffic Conditions a. Physical Characteristics Access to the site will be provided by two existing intersections on York Avenue South. York Avenue South is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 31 and is designated as a Major Collector by Hennepin County. Parklawn Avenue is a City street and is designated as a collector by the City of Edina. Existing traffic control, speed limits, and travel lanes are shown on Figure 3.4 for each study intersection. No roadway improvements are scheduled near the site. b. Traffic Volumes The weekday a.m., weekday p.m. and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts were conducted in 2008 at the, study intersections (see Figures 3.5, 3.6 & 3.7). The turning movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. The daily traffic volumes for the area roadways are shown on Figure 3.8. c. Level of Service l.os A — — An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway T f Capacity Manual. Intersections are assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and traffic control. LOS Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light .. traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow J, (over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is considered acceptable in urban 40s n = Acceptable` conditions. Individual movements are also assigned LOS grades. One or more individual movements typically operate at LOS F when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at -� LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal controlled s =unacep"* intersection in San Jose, CA). These LOS _ grades represent the overall intersection '` -- - operation, not individual movements. Source: city of The LOS results for the 2008 study hours are San Jose, ca shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4. The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.5 through 3.7 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 6 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study (� August, 2008 using SYNCHROTm software. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 3.1 — Existinq 2008 Level of Service (LOS) ` - - - l tin Eidstln fExfstin . 9 :Ally ftaK PM Peak' SatUWAV-.� lnte►skctlo_n }' ::.. Houk.- : 3 Hou Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/C B/F A/ D York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / B A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A/C A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A / B A/C A / C TL _ Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade Tor the overan intersection. I tie second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections operate acceptably at LOS B or better in the existing a.m. weekday, p.m. weekday and Saturday midday peak hours. As often happens along busy corridors such as York Avenue, some individual side street movements experience longer delays while the overall intersection operates acceptably with little overall delay. The eastbound and westbound approaches at the York Ave /North YMCA Entrance currently.experience LOS F in the weekday p.m. peak hour. The eastbound approach currently experiences LOS F at the York Avenue / Parklawn Avenue intersection in the weekday p.m. peak hour while the westbound approach experiences LOS E. d. Parking Volumes Parking capacity was determined to be 337 stalls combining spaces on both the west and east sides of the existing facility. Data on the actual number of cars parked was collected immediately prior to all three data collection timeframes. This beginning number was then adjusted based on the turning movement counts completed at the site's driveways to provide a total number of cars in the lots in fifteen. minute increments. Following in Figures 3.1 through 3.3 are the results of this data collection. Additional details are contained in the appendix. Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 7 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study ,f August, 2008 Figure 3.1 — Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking 400 350 N 300 250 o� 200 c 150 CL 100 50 0 Occupied Capacity Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking 400 350 300 N � 250 U) c 200 150 CL 100 50 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a a °o 7 In po 7 o - M O 7 M ui LO Uci t'f (o (o (o I� Co 00 00 CD W M CD Occupied Capacity Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking 400 350 300 N � 250 U) c 200 150 CL 100 50 0 Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 8 Traffic Impact Study A Occupied Capacity Edina, MN August, 2008 d a. CL a a a a a a °o 7 In po 7 o c° � ui LO Uci ui (o (o (o Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 8 Traffic Impact Study A Occupied Capacity Edina, MN August, 2008 Finiirs 3.3 — Existina Saturday Peak Period Parking 400r - 300-- , e I. 250 4 ..yam t... c 200 ` -� 150 - -- - - -- o. - -- - 100 - -=- - Q Q a- a Q Q Q Q a_ M O M O eL0 C, - Occupied — Capacity The maximum number of occupied spaces during the study periods was 177 spaces. Average occupancy, based on the available 337 parking spaces, was 40% of capacity. Following are the high and low occupancy rates for each time period: • Thursday a.m. -high 53% and low 31% • Thursday p.m. — high 42% and low 29% • Saturday — high 47% and low 27% e. Data Sources The sources for the data sited above are: • Turning movement counts — Traffic Data Inc. • Roadway geometrics and traffic control — Spack Consulting • Concept plan — BWBR Architects • Daily traffic volumes — Mn /DOT traffic flow maps South dale YMCA Redevelopment 9 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study August, 2008 Sac-k rnarm-m THE TRAFfIC STUDY COMPANY Existing Lanes & T YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue 30 mph ntrol or O N m C d Y O r a E a W Circle NE Traffic Circle SE (enter only) YMCA North Driveway All South Driveway Figure ...4 North No Scale a,ck s - THE TlAFFIC STUDY COMtANY Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN o n o_ e 4J 1 r 29 �I Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE r m m � N \3s �► Traffic Carole SE 22 Traffic Circle SW L 6 4Jiy r5 12r 4.111 7'i YMCA North Cq Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn { 0 N m C • a O Ali Figure 3.5 North No Scale LW\ 4� 24 � r 541 it* 18 ��► N r- 2D q-W N/ .r/ L 8 \ 4J 1 �► re South Driveway 47 � 4Wj 2a � � S ack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Existing PM Fame HOW IF YMCA Redevelopment Ed Ina, MN Apartrnent South Driveway * - -R r O H d 7 c • 0 Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE Ai 3 Fsaure - -ffcir-fh No Scale S ack PTH[ TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Existing Saturday Peak Hour YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN F-- 0 N m 7 C Q O } olumes /d `� F ure 3.7 North No ScaIE S ack P.THE T ,o.8 TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Flqure Existing Daily Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale r 4-7 c Circle NE Me Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway LEGEND 2005 Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes source: MNDOT Traffic Flow Maps 4. Projected Traffic The assumptions described in this section were reviewed by City of Edina engineering staff before the forecasts in this section were developed. a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the proposed multi -unit . housing facility. based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7t' Edition. The Weekday a.m. peak hour trip generation is for the "one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 7 -9 a.m. The Weekday p.m: peak hour trip generation is for the `one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 4 -6 p.m. The Saturday peak hour trip generation is for the "peak hour of generator". The resultant trip generations are shown in Table 4.1. Data for the YMCA trip generation in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7t' Edition was reviewed. The trip generation for adding 2,000 square feet would be very low and the data set based on membership has. very limited data. To be conservative, a trip generation analysis was performed for the YMCA expansion by multiplying the existing entering and exiting peak hour volumes by 15 %. This represents the possible maximum growth in membership. The resultant trip generations are shown in Table 4.1. No trip reductions for pass -by or diverted trips were made. It is assumed all of the trips for the site will be newly generated. Also, there is bus service available near the site on York Avenue but no trip reductions were taken for transit use. These assumptions result in a more conservative analysis. The directional orientation of the generated traffic is shown in Figure 4.1. This orientation is based on a weighted distribution of the traffic volumes currently using York Avenue South. The a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, Saturday peak hour and daily trips generated by the site were assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The traffic volumes added to the study roadways through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5. These traffic volumes will be added to the existing traffic volumes to develop the build -out conditions. b. Non -site Traffic Forecasting Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 scenario by applying 'a .92% compounded annual growth rate to the existing traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20 year growth factor of 1.2 the Mn /DOT State Aid office has assigned to Hennepin Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 15- Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study A7 V August, 2008 S ack PTHE ® TR AFFIC STUDY COMPANY Table 4.1 Forecast Trip Generation YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN nails VEilum ®s AM Peak Hour " ­ 1 Aq 1,4 &J'AW MWW ttl 01 . . y �rw 't MW 'lag" YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 1,000 GFA MuWamily Units - Market Rate 220 Dwelling Units 330 330 Multi-Family Unite - Market Rate 220 Dwelling Units ".0 6.72 50% 50% 0% 0 0% 0 149 148 Multi-Family Units -Affordable 220 Dwelling Units 43.0 6.72 50% 50% 0% 0 0% 0 1" 1" MuWamlly Units . Handicap 253 Dwelling Units 1 43.0 1 2.02 1 50% 50% 0% 0 1 0% 0 1 43 43 TOTALS TOTALS 4 1 0 1 0 65 43. 0 0 0 us 39 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour . .... ........ . f3: , 41.4 L " ­ 1 Aq 1,4 &J'AW MWW W . . y �rw 't MW 'lag" YMCA Expansion YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA MuWamily Units - Market Rate 220 Dwelling Units 44.0 n 21 MuWamily Units - Market Rate 220 Dwelling Units 44.0 0.51 20% 80% 0% 0 0% 0 4 Is Multi -Family Units -Affordable 220 Dwelling Unite 43.0 0.51 20% 00% 0% 0 0% 0 4 18 - Multi-Family Units -Handicap 253 Dwelling Units 43.0 0.06 50% 41% 0% 0 0% 0 2 1 TOTALS 4 1 0 1 0 65 43. 1 0 0 39 a PM Peak Hour . .... ........ . f3: , 41.4 L " ­ 1 Elm .11. . . -_ . -11 1: . V?, 211 21 YMCA Expansion as 1.000 GFA MuWamily Units - Market Rate 220 Dwelling Units 44.0 0.62 65% 35% 0% 0 0% 0 Is 10 Multi-Family Units Affordable 220 Dwelling Units 43.0 0.62 65% 35% 0% 0 0% 0 17 9 Multi-Family Units - Handicap 253 Dwelling Units. 43.0 0.17 1 515% 45% 0% 1 0 1 0% 0 4 43.0 TOTALS 55% "% 0% 0 I 0 4 1 0 1 0 65 43. Saturday Peak Hour E­; Elm R twq YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 14 22 Multi-Family Unite - Market Rate 220 Dwelling Units 44.0 0.52 60% 60% 0% 0 0% 0 11 11 _Multl-Family Units -Affordable 220 Dwelling Units 43.0 0.52 50% 50% 0% 0 0% 0 11 11 JMuWamlly Units . Handicap 253 Dwelling Units 43.0 0.17 55% "% 0% 0 0% 0 4 3 1 TOTALS � 1 0 0 40 47 _J NOTES: 1. GFA - Gross Floor Area 2. YMCA Expansion Daily =2.76 x normal rM rate for existing 70 KSF x 16% growth 3. YMCA Expansion Peak Hours =15% growth x existing entering and exiting volumes 4. All o trip M generation rates based on -Trip Generation", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th Ed" Vas otherwise noted. 5. All M. rip Generation Is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7:00 & 9 6. AW.M. Trip Generation Is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4:00 a 6:, 7. All other Saturday Midday Trip Generation Is for the peak hour of generator 5500 L. j ki0 gid?. - - - .,.. -.' - '�'1. - •s...:1,.. • :�es�TS •. as ir tj _ s •Y �i S- - a c THE T9AFFIC STUOV COMPANY AM peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue 5 7 0 H m D C m X r O Traffic Circle PIE Traffic Circle SE Figur o2 North No Scale S . ack 0 THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY PIN Peak Hour 'Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway 0 m 0 e • 0 k as Fiaure 4.2, North No Scala Apartment South Driveway 0 0 m 0 e m 0 Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE A �I P Uac TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Daily Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina. MN o 0 Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle EE Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway Apartment South Driveway YMCA South Driveway Parklawn Avenue 100 0 0 o ® g C a 0 Age u re 4.5 North No Scale r S a c-k Put TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 AM. Peak Hour 146-Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway F7 0 N m C • a 0 03 Fiaure1q.6 North No Scale 46 ac UMVINJI&M M PTRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 PM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway 9 0 N m 7 C m Y r O W Fiaure 4.7 North No Scale Pack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2 012 Saturday Peak Hour N® -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA.Redeveloprnent Edina, NIN Apartrnent South Driveway V 0 fA m 7 C • O Traffic Circle NE. Traffic Circle SE Sack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 Daily No- Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edlna, MN Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue r3 7 0 N e G a Y O Trafflc Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North Driveway South Driveway 4S L Fiaure 4.c North No Sca k 2012 AM Peak Hour Build Traffic VOlumeS YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN i6 4-10 4 4r 30 W Traffic Circle NUN Traffic Circle NE gas 41 40 em 20s% Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE 00 L00 C' Y� r '�0 B�� 4r 60 10.9 '�t�. o 1 20 Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawm Avenue 0 0 N 7 C r O Fi ure 0 North No Scale 1L 40 \ 4om 30 o e o P N / so j 9 I to 20 � 91 P./ e �30 e � I 4%T . 10 0 10 South Drivej* 120 +mW ° 4%T . SD' a-C fw� WOONE THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 PM Peak I YMCA Redeveiopment Edina, MN our Build Apartment South Driveway Darldmun Avenue c Volumes W� 9 O d1 • 7 C • O } Ait Flaure 4.11 North No Scale Apartment South Driveway O C • O c Volumes All Figure 402 T North No Scale S pack TtAFFIC STUDr GOM�ANY 2012 Daily Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Fiqure 4.13_ North. No Scale Circle NE Ic Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway Aq 0 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis a. 2012 Level of Service.Analysis The LOS results for the 2012 study hours are shown in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4. It is assumed all of the lane configurations and traffic control are the same between the No -Build and Build scenarios. Table 5.1 No Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.6, 4.7 &.4.8. Table 5.2 Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTm software. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 5.1 — 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) fntersectfoi> 10, glVt Freak H ouma PM dealt; Hour ,: No Bui1'*" . SaturdaW- Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D B/F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / A A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / D A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A/13 A / C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection.. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. Table 5.2 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Inters ®ctlon Buird ,pM Pear Hour . `, Build. PM s Pea fC: Hour , Bulld; . Sat' rda Pealt: Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D C/ F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A/13 A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / E D / F A / E York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B I A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A/C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overan mtersecnon. 1 ne second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections will operate acceptably at LOS D or better in all of the study scenarios. Based on level of service Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 31 k j � Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study August, 2008 analyses, there may be vehicle stacking issues at the North YMCA entrance and on Parklawn Avenue. Vehicle stacking at these two intersections is addressed in the next section. Figures 4.9 and 4.13 show the 2012 daily volumes anticipated on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in the No -Build and Build scenarios.. Based on calculations from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, a four lane divided roadway such as York Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 28,000 to 35,000 vehicles per day. A four lane undivided roadway such as Parklawn Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 15,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily volume thresholds for LOS D on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in both the 2012 No- Build and Build scenarios. bo Queuing Analysis Based on the Level of Service analyses above, the York Avenue /Parklawn. Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections may have significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the p.m. peak hour. To determine the length of the queues, a more detailed traffic analysis was performed with a SimTrafficTm micro - simulation model. The intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.4 were used with the p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.7 and. 4.11. These inputs for the York Avenue corridor were transferred from SYNCHROTM to SimTrafFcTll The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of 0, a seeding duration of 3 minutes, and a recording duration of 60 minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five times with random number seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a seeding duration of 3 minutes and a recording duration of 60 minutes.. The stacking and delay results are contained in the Appendix. Table. 5.3 shows the stacking results for the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections in the 2012 p.m. peak hour. South dale YMCA Redevelopment 32 11 a Edina, MN Trafflc Impact Study /3 I �- August, 2008 Table 5.3 — 2012 P.M. Peak Hour Stack6ng Results Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTrafficTm for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. The westbound approach from the northern YMCA access point onto York Avenue is the only intersection where vehicle stacking will exceed storage. If a westbound 150 foot long right turn lane is provided next to a westbound shared /through left lane, the maximum queue in the right turn lane will be 90 feet and the maximum queue in the shared lane will be 140 feet. This is better storage than is provided in the existing condition. ca Traffic C®ntr®i Needs Traffic signals or roundabouts should be installed at intersections when justified per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 33 g ®� Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study IT August, 2008 ti =. �yK �( x( —�: /l.17�A "tG Yp��, /, 1 .0 'Ye:. © . " ---- l .. �J'{' 1A5 e��as. A'G'CY 'i y,r ��t�' li ��, ii� c ,�'.`qT L?� Tar /��y _ ` n'� Q ,�iVel,.INS �L�l. f: �{-�� /J7PC'ir^ "i �J. �i i.(T!f .__. '•. X1-.1 U. �i` - �1�!�F .�.[InaiG/�i 230 ft 330A 50 ft 50 ft -o Left (600 ft) (600 ft) • (100 ft) (100 ft) c 0 230 ft 330 ft 50 ft 50 ft Thru (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) w �a uJ 110 ft 190 ft 50 ft 50 ft Right (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) 40 ft 50 ft. 190 ft 250 ft Left (150 ft) (150 ft) (150 ft) (150 ft) 40 ft 50 ft 190 ft 250 ft �o .mN (150 ft) (150 ft) (150 ft) (150 ft) 190 ft 250 ft 40 ft 50 ft Right (150 ft) (150 ft) (150 ft) (150 ft) Left 60 ft 60 ft 50 ft 50 ft c (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) g Oft Oft 20 ft 20 ft Thru (900 ft) . (900 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) Oft Oft 20 ft 20 ft Right (250 ft) (250 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) 30 ft 30 ft 60 ft 80 ft Left (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) . (100 ft) Oft Oft Oft Oft 9 Thru (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) co Right 20 ft 20 ft O ft 20 ft (225 ft) (225 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTrafficTm for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. The westbound approach from the northern YMCA access point onto York Avenue is the only intersection where vehicle stacking will exceed storage. If a westbound 150 foot long right turn lane is provided next to a westbound shared /through left lane, the maximum queue in the right turn lane will be 90 feet and the maximum queue in the shared lane will be 140 feet. This is better storage than is provided in the existing condition. ca Traffic C®ntr®i Needs Traffic signals or roundabouts should be installed at intersections when justified per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 33 g ®� Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study IT August, 2008 Devices. None of the traffic volume warrants in the Manual will be met in the 2012 Build condition. In order to meet the Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3), the minor street would need to have 150 left plus through volumes on one approach. None of the study intersections will meet this threshold. The westbound approach at the northern YMCA access will have 60 vehicles in the p.m. peak hour with little traffic growth after the redevelopment happens. The eastbound Parklawn Avenue approach to York Avenue will have 110 vehicles in the 2012 Build p.m. peak hour. If traffic grows in the study area, the York AvenueiParklawn Avenue may be a long term candidate to be controlled by a traffic signal or a roundabout. No new traffic control devices are required for the YMCA site redevelopment. The existing stop sign control for traffic leaving the site should be maintained with the redevelopment. d. Parking Analysis The maximum number of occupied parking spaces was 177 during the study period. Increasing the YMCA's parking occupancy by 15% based on the maximum membership growth rate results in 204 parking spaces. According to ITE's Parking Generation, 3'd Edition, the average peak period demand for a suburban'apartment building is 1.20 parked vehicles per dwelling unit. For a congregate care facility, the peak period demand is 0.41 parked vehicles per dwelling unit. Assuming 87 dwelling units operate at the apartment building rate and 43 dwelling units operate at the congregate care rate results in a total of 122 parking spaces being needed for the multi - family building. The total- parking demand for the YMCA and multi - family unit building is 326 parking spaces. This is conservative in that it assumes parking for both. buildings will peak at the same time when in fact the two uses will likely have complimentary parking demands. e. Transit Facilities There is a bus stop on York Avenue directly in front of the YMCA. Metro Transit routes 538, 539, and 578 serve the bus stop during the morning and evening -rush hours. Downtown Minneapolis and the Mall of America are directly accessible via these routes. In addition, these routes stop at the Southdale Transit Center where transfers can be made to Metro Transit route 6, 114, 152, 515, 631, and 693. The YMCA site is well served by Metro Transit bus service. Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 349 Edina, MN Tra, fJic Impact Study August, 2008 'fo Travel Demand Management Plan Travel demand management plans work well in reducing trips back and forth between work and horse via single occupant vehicles in the rush hours. The YMCA and the Common Bond building will make reasonable efforts to reduce these types of trips. The YMCA and multi - family building are directly served by Metro Transit via the bus stop adjacent to the site. The YMCA implements flexible work hours with the majority of its staff and volunteers working outside of the normal 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. work schedule. The YMCA is not a large enough employer at this location to fully implement other strategies such as structured carpooling or telecommuting. 60 Conclusions The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, weekday p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. The York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection may experience significant vehicle stacking in the p.m. peak hour after the redevelopment. To mitigate this stacking, it is recommended the westbound approach consist of a 150 foot long exclusive right turn lane and a shared through/left lane.. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue / Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grove at the intersection. Based on the parking analysis completed for the redevelopment, it is anticipated that providing 326 parking spaces for the site will be adequate. Southdale YMCA Redevelopment 35 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study k. q S August, 2008 7. Recommendations Based -on -the. traffic- analysis -- contained -in this report, the following improvements are recommended: • Construct a 150 foot right turn lane and one shared through/left turn lane on the westbound approach of the York Avenue/YMCA North Entrance intersection: • Construct one right turn lane on the westbound approach of the York Avenue/YMCA South Entrance intersection. • Control both driveways out of the redevelopment site with stop signs, while York Avenue remains free flowing. • Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. • Construct at least 326 parking stalls on the site. 8. Appendix a. Traffic counts b. Parking capacity analysis. c. Capacity analysis backup d. Queuing analysis backup Southdale YMCA Redevelopment .36 d q ` Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study / T August, 2.008 AGENDA Regular Meeting of the Edina Transportation Commission 6:00 PM, Thursday, September 18, 2008 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Les Wanninger, Jean White, Jennifer Janovy, Steve Brown, Geof Workinger, Julie Sierks, Warren Plante, Marc Usem, MEMBERS ABSENT: Tom Bonneville, Paul Mooty STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Rebecca Foster 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by chair Workinger. It. Comments a. Chair Comments Chair Workinger said he would like Commissioner Brown to brief the ETC on the West 70`h Street/Cornelia Area Traffic Survey. Commissioner Brown reported that approximately 700 of 1400 surveys have been returned. The survey results will be completed for the next SAC meeting which will be scheduled for mid to the end of October. b. Public Comments None. /it. Old Business a. No Old Business — Au_gust Meeting was Cancelled Commissioner Plante asked staff how the transportation issues were being addressed in and around the schools now that school has started. Mr. Sullivan gave an update on sidewalks that have been installed over the summer and that crosswalk paint has been freshened up. The staff is working with the public and private schools and residents with fall construction updates. The Traffic Safety Committee is also reviewing new concerns from residents to install or change crosswalk locations, speeds, or volumes of traffic in school neighborhoods. Mr. Sullivan said the City meets with the Edina School Transportation quarterly or on an as- needed basis to discuss current issues. Ill. New Business Chair Workinger gave a warm welcome to the two newest ETC members Commissioner Janovy representing the Bike Task Force and student member Commissioner Sierks. IN a. 7355 York Avenue - Sou#hdale YMCA and CommonB®nd Flousingg Assistant City Engineer Sullivan discussed the Transportation Impact Analysis of the new 72,000 sq ft YMCA facility immediately west of the existing facility. The building would be built in the parking lot of the current facility. Once the new YMCA building opens, a 130 unit multi- family building would be built on the site of the razed YMCA building. Based on the review of the traffic study, the following questions and comments were raised by the City's traffic consultant, Mr. Rickart: 1. A figure should be provided showing the studied intersections in relationship to the proposed site. 2. Although the Executive Summary discusses the intersections and driveways analyzed, it should also be included in Section 2, Proposed Development and Study Area. In addition, a discussion on the existing and proposed access locations and geometry should be provided. [He assumed] that the proposed locations do not change and the existing geometry is proposed not to change. A figure showing the existing site access and circulation with respect to the proposal should be provided. 3. Traffic counts were conducted during the AM Peak, PM Peak and Saturday Peak. How was it determined that the Saturday late AM was the peak period? 4. A figure showing the location of the existing parking should be provided. The analysis shows that only 177 spaces are used on an average day. Are there events that require additional parking? The parking need should be based on a peak event. 5. Figure 3.4 should be updated to show all of the side street Stop signs. 6. Section4, Projected Traffic indicates that the assumptions in the .section_ were revised with City staff. This is true in some cases, but not all. m It is indicated that the Directional Orientation is based on a weighted distribution. This should be explained. o The city's model was not used for the analysis. This was okayed in this case because the intersections being analyzed were not all in the city's model. They will be added should the development get approved. o The background traffic assumed less than 1% per year growth rate based on the MnDOT .State Aid projection factor. This is acceptable, however, other adjacent development should also be included in the projections (i.e. Westin, 69th and York, etc.). 7. The analysis results indicate that the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue with the north site entrance will have some movements at unsatisfactory Levels of Service. o The overall Level of Service at the north side entrance will be at a LOS D with the westbound movement at LOS F. With the additional traffic associated with the adjacent developments this should be closely looked at again. o The queuing analysis only looked at the PM Peak hour. The traffic volume exiting the north side entrance is higher in the AM Peak. To insure that the queues and storage lengths are adequate, the AM Peak should also be analyzed at both intersections. o The mitigation, based on the queuing analysis, is to add a westbound right turn lane at the north side entrance. A mitigation analysis should be provided showing the LOS and queuing results with the addition of this lane. Also, a figure should be provided showing that the right turn lane can be accomplished on the site. 2 8. As discussed previously, the parking analysis should look at peak event for the YMCA. Providing a proposed 326 spaces, 11 less than today, is a concern. A shared parking analysis should also be conducted to determine exactly how .much parking demand there truly will be on site. 9. The study discusses the use and availability of transit for the YMCA site. It .should be expanded to include how people at the YMCA will get to the transit facilities. Are sidewalks provided /available? A detailed site plan should be provided. Staff's recommendation is as follow: Recommendation: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated August 29, 2008 and follow up memo dated September 17, 2008. Staff and WSB believe that the memo addresses all the concerns. If so desired by the Ttansportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that traffic generated from the proposed 7355 York Avenue does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system; with the following conditions: 1. The Development will be responsible for improvements to the infrastructure at the median nose of York Avenue and the north entrance /exit. Info /Background: Staff received a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) on August 29, 2008 for the construction of a new 72,000 sq ft YMCA facility immediately west of the existing facility. The building would be built in the parking lot of the current facility. Once the new YMCA building opens then a 130 unit multi - family building would be built on the site of the razed YMCA building. The final build out for both buildings would be in 2011 or 2012. Staffs initial review of the TIA and recommendation to the ETC at the time of submission of the ETC Packets (on September 11, 2008) is shown in the following: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated August .29, 2008 and review a memo dated September 9, 2008 from WSB and Associates. Currently staff and our traffic consultant WSB feel . that this transportation submittal is not yet complete. Staff, WSB and Spack Consulting are working to resolve the outstanding items listed in the attached memo prior to the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on September 18, 2008. Currently the conditions of the approval are: 1. This development shall address all comments in WSB's September 9, 2008 memo to the satisfaction of the ETC and Engineering Department. 3 Aq 1 2. Improved site plan showing mitigation measures to the site, including new extended right turn lane. Therefore staff is withholding a recommendation on this project pending the resolution of the outstanding issues. recommendation that the development team be responsible for the relocation of the south entrance. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown. All voted ave. b. 6200 Interlachen Blvd — Interlachen CC Maintenance Bld_ia Assistant City Engineer Sullivan discussed the construction of a new 24,000 sq. ft. maintenance and storage facility on Belmore Lane, east of John Street. Interlachen Country Club wanted to move the access from Waterman Avenue to Belmore Lane. This triggered a traffic impact study. Since the draft traffic study was completed, the development team decided to gate the proposed access to Belmore Lane and use it for only emergency access. Therefore, all trips generated from the new maintenance facility would continue to use Waterman Avenue. No action necessary. V. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of July 17, 2008 Commissioner Wanninger motioned to approve the minutes of July 17, 2008, and it was seconded by Commissioner Brown. All voted ave. Mr. Sullivan informed the ETC that staff will be meeting with the City Council about the 2008 Comp Plan Transportation Chapter next Wednesday. At that time, he will find out what direction will be needed for the Circulator Service in the Southdale Area and the East/West Connector. Commissioner White informed the ETC about the SW Transit Way. They are studying Light Rail in the SW Area and Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority completed the alternative analysis and is into the draft environmental impact study now and they will have scoping meetings that are open to the public in October. Vt. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Brown) Commissioner Brown informed the ETC about the 2008 Comp Plan review. Vll. Staff Updates (Mr. Sullivan) Staff updates included the W. 70th St. Cornelia Area Traffic Study survey and the Comp Plan as listed above. Chair Workinger asked that a 'Bike Task Force Update' be added to the agenda for future meetings. Vlll. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 7 :25 p.m. 4 Am Jackie i•ioogenakker From: Linda Roberts [lindatroberts @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September, 25, 2008 10:11 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: YMCA/CB Development Plan To the City of Edina: We are opposed to the YMCA/Common Bond Development Plan, as outlined in your 9/20 Public Hearing Notice: * We believe that during these challenging and financially risky times,.it is fiscally irresponsible for these non -profit organizations (and for -profit firms, for that matter) to proceed with capital development projects. * Although we are confident that financial markets will improve with time, we question the need for expanded bricks - and -mortar for the YMCA structure, versus programming and services to help local/regional residents. * We have been concerned for some time about crime rates along the York Ave. corridor; especially between 63rd and 76th streets. Consequently, we are opposed to the construction of affordable housing @ the 73rd Street site by Common Bond. Thank you. Linda and Bill Roberts 7420 Edinborough Way #6306 Edina, MN 55435 �IDJ 9/25/2008 �O t� MINUTE SUMMARY Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair John Lonsbury Julie Risser, Kevin Staunton, Michael Schroeder, Mike Fischer, Steve Brown, Arlene Forrest and Patrick Schnettler MEMBERS ABSENT: Floyd Grabiel and Nancy Scherer STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: August 27, 2008, Planning Commission meeting. II. NEW BUSINESS: 2008.0012 Preliminary Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan with Variances YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis 7355 York Avenue South, Edina, MN Staff Presentation: Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing 70,000 square foot YMCA and build a new 73,000 square foot YMCA, a two -level parking ramp, and a four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The development would occur in two phases. The first phase would be the construction of a new YMCA builidng in the front parking lot, while the existing YMCA remained open. Existing parking behind the existing YMCA would be used, and temporary parking is proposed on the City park site to the north. Once the new structure is completed, the existing building would be �j a PC Minutes October 1,2008 Page 2 demolished, and the parking ramp constructed. The second phase would be the construction of the apartment building. Planner Teague explained that half of the proposed housing units would be allocated for people with physical disabilities including multiple sclerosis. The units would be primarily affordable housing units. Planner Teague stated the proposal before the Planning Commission is a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment and ultimately, would require all of the following: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi - Public to Mixed Use. The mixed -use designation would allow the residential use. 2. A Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD -5.) 3. Variances. (To be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals, if the Council approves the Preliminary Development Plan, Preliminary Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment.): a. A 5 -foot front yard building setback variance from 50 to 45 for the YMCA.. b. Building setback variances of 15, 27, and 30.feet from the required 50 -foot setback to 35, 23, and 20 feet. (See variances on page A27a.) 4. A Conditional Use Permit for a private recreational facility. 5. An Overall /Final Development Plan. Planner Teague further explained that in order to obtain the above - mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step process. That process is as follows: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. Because of the Comprehensive Plan approval necessary, this application requires a four -fifths vote of the City Council. 2. Conditional Use Permit. Overall & Final Development Plan. Variances and Final Rezoning. The Overall & Final Development Plan process is generally the same as the Preliminary Development Plan. However, a three -fifths favorable vote of the City Council is required. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi- Public to Mixed Use, and Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD -5.) Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall /Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit & Variances based on the following findings: AM 3 PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 3 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2.' The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south. and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new. and improved YMCA facility," and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi - Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units, by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan dated August 29, 2008. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A11 of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. The streetscape plan along York Avenue should be revised to create a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere. 4. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 6. Eliminate the 8 parallel parking spaces facing Xerxes Avenue to meet the 20 -foot green space requirement. 7. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. 8. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be. paved and meet all minimum requirements of the city engineer. Appearing for the Applicant: Harold Mezile, YMCA, Elizabeth Flannery, Common Bond, and Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners. Applicant Presentation: Harold Mezile, 5421 Malibu Drive, addressed the Commission and. gave a brief overview of the history of the YMCA. Mr. Mezile reported that the Southdale YMCA is one of the largest and is extremely successful, serving both Edina and surrounding communities. Continuing, Mr. Mezile stated the existing layout of the YMCA building doesn't meet the needs of the 21St century with many areas operating inefficiently. The proposed new building would be designed to function 4(0� PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 4 better to meet today's needs. Mr. Mezile explained the YMCA is in partnership with Common Bond on the housing element of this proposal. The major goal -of the housing element would be to provide housing to people with Multiple Sclerosis. Living in close proximity to a recreational facility with pool is a huge benefit for those with MS. Mr. Mezile told the Commission in the past the YMCA has partnered with a number of different organizations to provide housing opportunities for those with special needs and the general public. Concluding Mr. Mezile introduced Ms. Elizabeth Flannery with Common Bond to speak to the housing portion of this redevelopment. Ms. Elizabeth Flannery, Common Bond addressed the Commission and explained Common Bond is the largest non - profit developer in the area. Ms. Flannery said on this proposal Common Bond will partner with the MS Society to provide a percentage of the housing units to people with MS. Ms. Flannery said that the location of the YMCA is excellent because it has great access to public transit and there are many amenities in close proximity. Comments /questions from the Commission Chair Lonsbury questioned how ownership of the of the "apartment lot" would be handled. Mr. Dorgan responded that at this time it is believed there would be a ground lease with Common Bond. Usually those leases run 30+ years. The proposed YMCA building and all land is and would continue to be owned by the Y. Chair Lonsbury noted the proposed new building is only 3,000 square feet larger than the existing building and asked Mr. Dorgan the reason for the slight increase. Mr. Dorgan explained the size of the existing building is adequate; however, the interior layout of the existing building doesn't function efficiently. The layout of the new building will provide the right spacing to meet the needs of all members, seniors, adults, children, and those with physical disabilities. Chair Lonsbury asked if any Common Bond facilities are located in Edina. Ms. Flannery responded there are three Common Bond locations in Edina, Yorkdale Townhomes, Summit Place and South Haven. Chair Lonsbury asked Ms. Flannery if Common Bond has a good relationship with neighbors. Ms. Flannery responded that she believes they have a good relationship with their neighbors. Chair Lonsbury referred to a letter from a neighbor who owns property near Yorkdale Townhomes that included Edina Police reports from incidents occurring at Yorkdale Townhomes including the mention of a shooting and drug deals. Continuing, Chair Lonsbury asked if there is a property manager on site at fhe Yorkdale Townhomes. Ms. Flannery responded with regard to the police reports that she will have to follow up on those complaints, adding the site does have a full time property manager plus a service center that runs a teen program and helps the residents of the project. Chair Lonsbury asked Ms. Flannery how 4 ios\ PC Minutes October 1', 2008 Page 5 Common Bond selects its- residents. Ms. Flannery responded Common Bond does credit and felony checks on all potential residents. Public Comment Cindy Leffler, 7401 York Terrace, addressed the Commission and informed them she has been a victim of crime, adding her home has been burglarized twice, and is afraid at times to go out of her house in the evening. Ms. Leffler added at one time police and /or security officers actually patrolled the area, reiterating at. times she is afraid in her own home. Ms. Leffler stated the City seems to forget the small pocket of Edina she lives in. Ms. Leffler told the. Commission she has a concern that if this proposal is approved as presented more multi- housing will be added to an already congested area. Ms. Leffler said she is also concerned that if approved her house may be damaged during the construction process.. Continuing, Ms. Leffler said Common Bond previously hosted a neighborhood meeting depicting plans to increase the density of Yorkdale Townhomes, adding if that is still their plan, along with this proposal, the area will be oversaturated. Concluding, Ms. Leffler provided the Commission with photo's taken of the area before the YMCA was constructed. Patty Cagle, 7350 York Avenue, told the Commission she regularly uses the YMCA, adding it is difficult for a pedestrian to get across York Avenue. Ms. Cagle said one concern she has is with the design of the building, pointing out if the door to the new facility is located on the rear (as proposed) the walking distance for a pedestrian is increased. Ms. Cagle said putting a door on the front of the building would make more sense to her. Ms Cagle concluded that the area is already very busy and with the addition of more housing, congestion will only increase. Jerry Leffler, 7401 York Terrace, questioned if Common Bond still has plans to redevelop their Yorkdale site, and if so, adding another 130 units will just add to the traffic congestion. Mr. Leffler also questioned the reasoning behind taking down a 35 year old building, and who's going to pay for its removal. Mr. Leffler also noted traffic has greatly increased in this area, pointing out 76th Street has become very congested because of the problems with bridge closures in Richfield. Concluding, Mr. Leffler said it appears to him that this area may become overdeveloped and if it does a "prison like feel" will happen to his neighborhood. Mr. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, said he would like more information on the housing portion of the project, the layout of the apartment units, lease terms, subsidy ratio, etc. Mr. Bohan also stated in his opinion the site isn't laid out correctly; there is too much "building" on too small of a site. Concluding, Mr. Bohan said he also believes with regard to the variances requested that the hardship test has not been met. AN ,PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 6 Mary Melberg; 3019 74t" Street, Richfield, told the Commission she didn't receive a public hearing notification from Edina. Ms. Melberg stated that presently on -a windy day the refuse from the YMCA blows into her yard, which is a nuisance, and questioned how that will be controlled, especially during the construction phase. Ms. Melberg pointed out if the apartment building is approved as presented the view from her bedroom will be a four story apartment tower. Ms. Melberg also questioned the impact this development would have on Richfield. Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion -All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Comments Commissioner Fischer asked Planner Teague if the City of Richfield was notified. Planner Teague responded the City of Edina notified the City of Richfield. Edina does not have the names and addresses of Richfield residents at our disposal. Commissioner Forrest questioned the parking for the apartment building. Mr. Dorgan explained parking for the residential portion of the project is one space per unit. Mr. Dorgan added there are 80 underground parking stalls and additional parking provided under the deck. There also is dedicated parking for the YMCA. Continuing, Mr. Dorgan said the Y will also provide the City with a Proof of Parking agreement if in the future the City deems more parking is needed. Commissioner Forrest asked if Common Bond is still considering redevelopment of the Yorktown Townhomes. Ms. Flannery responded that last year Common Bond was considering a redevelopment of the townhomes and did host a neighborhood meeting; however, since that time those plans have changed. Commissioner Forrest asked how the financing will occur for the housing element. Mr. Dorgan explained the YMCA owns the land and will own the new Y building. 'Common Bond will own the apartment complex but will lease the land from the YMCA. Commissioner Risser asked Ms. Flannery the square footage of the proposed apartment units and the proposed bedroom mix. Ms. Flannery said the building will be constructed with one, two and three bedroom units with an average square footage of 850 square feet. All units will be fully accessible. There will be underground parking and an elevator. Units would have a one year lease. Commissioner Risser asked how the apartment units would be allocated to those with MS. Ms. Flannery responded Common Bond will work closely with the Multiple Sclerosis Society to find the right ratio and help with the leasing of the apartment units. 4107 PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 7 Commissioner Fischer asked Ms. Flannery what the "magic formula" is for this building. Ms. Flannery said at this time that is still under consideration. Ms... Flannery told the Commission not all apartment units will be available to those with MS. The proposed building will also contain a mixture of income and market based units. Concluding, Ms. Flannery said at this time they believe 50% of those occupying the building will have MS. Commissioner Fischer said he has a bit of a concern mixing populations, and questioned how that would work. Ms. Flannery acknowledged Common Bond hasn't developed a mixed project of this size before, but believes it is possible. Commissioner Fischer stated he believes mixing incomes is successful, but reiterated he does have a concern mixing vulnerable adults with the general population. Commissioner Risser asked Mr. Dorgan why the site was laid out as presented. Mr. Dorgan said different design scenarios were looked at, adding it was believed the layout as presented works best for access. Commissioner Brown commented that he also struggles with the layout of the site, adding he has some reservations with parking and if the parking provided is adequate for the apartment component of the project. A discussion ensued with Commissioners indicating they have some concerns with the overall placement of the buildings and their relationship to the street and neighborhood. Commissioners acknowledged there is a grade change, but with the building "pulled up" to the street there will be a disconnect between street level and the buildings facade. Another thing to consider is that while the Commission has expressed the opinion that buildings should positively address the street this building has no _entrance on York Avenue, which isn't pedestrian friendly. Commissioners also stated they believe more could be done to mitigate the variances, suggesting a reduction in apartment units. Further discussion focused on existing and potential nuisance aspects of the proposal, noise, litter, construction debris, etc. Planner Teague informed neighbors and the Commission that the Edina Health and Building Departments will respond to complaints from neighbors if they have any. Noise, refuse, construction activity, etc. are controlled and enforced by the Health and Building Departments. Continuing their discussion Commissioners also noted from the letters received (which included a police report) and neighbor comments that neighbors aren't happy with the "activities" that occur at the Common Bond managed townhomes and questioned how Common Bond would address those concerns. Ms. Flannery addressed the Commission and stated with regard to the letters received that she hasn't read them or the police reports, but would be willing to look into the matter and address those issues. Ms. Flannery said she would also supply the Commission with letters of support, reiterating she can't respond at this time to the police reports because she hasn't seen them. Continuing, Ms. Aldo PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 8 Flannery stated she would be willing to meet with all neighbors, and has met with neighbors in the past including the Leffler's. Chair Lonsbury asked Ms. Flannery if the townhomes have on -site security. Ms. Flannery responded in the affirmative. Mr. Dorgan addressed the Commission and asked them to defer action on their request to allow them time to meet'and review the concerns and suggestions expressed by the neighbors and the Commission. Commission Action Commissioner Brown moved to table 2008.0012. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 2008.0013 Conditional Use Permit Interlachen Country Club 6200 Interlachen Boulevard Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Interlachen Country Club is proposing to build two new maintenance buildings on property adjacent to and owned by the Country Club, and in the current Belmore Lane right -of -way. The site exists today with two single - family homes and the cul -de -sac for Belmore Lane. The two homes would be removed, and Belmore Lane would be shortened, and . reconstructed. The main building would be 20,000 square feet in size, and the second building would be 2,600 square feet in size. Planner Teague explained access to the maintenance building would be from an existing interior road off Interlachen Boulevard and Waterman Avenue. An emergency vehicle access and gate is proposed at the end of Belmore Lane. The applicant originally was proposing a public access to the new facilities off of Belmore Lane. However, revised the plans after concern was raised by the neighbors who did not want additional traffic brought through their neighborhood. Planner Teague noted the request requires a Conditional Use Permit and a Vacation of a portion of Belmore Lane. The roadway Vacation would be considered when the City Council considers the Conditional Use Permit. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build new maintenance facilities at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for the Interlachen Country Club based on the following findings: Ato � Correspondence City Of Edina Planning Dept. 4801 West 50th Street dina, Mn.55424 Dear Sirs: I live at Edina Place, 7300 York Ave. South. In your planning of a New YMCA and four story Unit, is there any plans for road improvement? Traffic from York Avenue Traffic from the YMCA Traffic from Edina Place Traffic from Fire Station Check this out from each exit add entrances. MOre traffic from YMCA and the Housing Development? if That is my concern. 6, B. Marmas 7300 York Ave. S. #203 Edina, Mn. 55435 I-Z �tD \oz Jackie Hoogenakker From: Marni Noyman [marninoyman @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Gal Noyman Subject: YMCA Public Hearing Good morning. My husband and I own a condo at Edina Place and we are unable to attend the public hearing meeting on January 20.. We are for the YMCA revamp however we are opposed to the building of the 130 -unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. Thank you for your time, Marni & Gal Noyman 1/16/2009 A Jackie Hoogenakker m: Patricia Handler [pattyhhandler @m ac. com] ,nt: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:19 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: YMCA building permit The following is my response to the YMCA building request. There is no arguement about the need to rebuild the York Ave. YMCA. I have reservations about the proposed 130 -unit apartment building. Immediately south of the existing W are low income or subsidized apartment housing. Will the proposed YMCA apartment units going to be similar and possibly not subject to property taxes? I.be'lieve the neighborhood has sufficient low income properties; more would be excessive. Count me as supportive of rebuilding the .YMCA center,, but opposed to the apartment building. Seymour Handler, 525 Coventry Lane Y 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Joe Videle, CRM Dvidele @stuartco.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:24 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: Public Hearing notice- YMCA location Jackie What is "MS "? Joe Videle, CRM Vice President of Property Management 952 - 948 -9503 Phone 952 - 948 -9570 Fax jyid.ele @stuartco_.co..m w W w. stU artco.,com From: Jackie Hoogenakker [mailto :]Hoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:21 PM To: Joe Videle, CRM Subject: RE: Public Hearing notice- YMCA location The new apartment building will be "affordable" - 50% of the occupants will have MS. If you need further information just give me a call at 952 - 826 -0465. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Joe Videle, CRM [mailto:jvidele @stuartco.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:26 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Public Hearing notice- YMCA location To: Edina Planning Department. I am in receipt of the Public Hearing Notice dated January 9th We manage the York Plaza Apartments located across from the YMCA site. One question. Is the new apartment building going to be specifically "market rate" or will it be "affordable" i.e. tax credit or section 8 or subsidized, or income restricted in any way? York Plaza is market rate. We are trying to determine if the new apartments would be a market rate project. Joe Videle, CRM Vice President of Property Management 952- 948 -9503 Phone 952- 948 -9570 Fax jyidel.e. @stuartc.o.com 1/16/2009 Jackie Hoogenakker From: G C JOYSLIN [gjoyslin @q.com] Monday, September 22, 2008 12:24 PM _. Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: opinion 1 am a rsident of 7500 York Cooperative, and am in favor or the plans for a new YMCA facility - -with or without 130 units of housing. That area of Edina has been neglected, and we certainly do not need any more shops. Of course, this depends upon the appearance of the facility and housing. Signed: Grace C. Joyslin 9/22/2008 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Linda Roberts [lindatroberts @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:11 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: YMCA/CB Development Plan To the City of Edina: 'e "4. We are opposed to the YMCA/Common Bond Development Plan, as outlined in your 9/20 Public Hearing Notice: * We believe that during these challenging and financially risky times, it is fiscally irresponsible for these non - profit organizations (and for -profit firms, for that matter) to proceed with capital development projects. * Although we are confident that financial markets will improve with time, we question the need for expanded bricks - and -mortar for the YMCA structure, versus programming and services to help local/regional residents. * We have been concerned for some time about crime rates along the York Ave. corridor, especially between 63rd and 76th streets. Consequently, we are opposed to the construction of affordable housing @ the 73rd Street site by Common Bond. Thank you. Linda and Bill Roberts 7420 Edinborough Way #6306 Edina, MN 55435 kIDI Jackie Hoocienakker ►m: CAROLE BROSZ [crbl @mymailstation.com] nt: Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:49 PM . To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: YMCA..new I. have no objection of anew YMCA being built at 7355 York AVE. EDINA ..... but I 'dont want anymore housing built . in this area...We HAVE too many people that are having.trouble trying to sell their condo etc. here now .... give us a break.!! THANK YOU..... i Jackie H000enakker From: I.getzkin @att.net Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:35 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: new ymca and housing units As regards the notice from the planning commission for construction of New YMCA and housing units. We object strongly to the building of 130 housing units whether they are subsidized or not. This area is already saturated with housing. The monstrosity of the huge Westin plus units now underway across from Key Cadillac and behind Walgreens. At what point will City Hall and or the planning commission say enough is enough? So #608 Edina, MN Tel 952 835 4319 1 Bea and Leonard Getzkin 7220 York Ave Jackie Hoogenakker From: Bob Malby [rmalby @comcast.net] Sunday, September 28, 2008 1:12 PM �.,. Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2008 -0012 YMCA In addition to being a resident of Edina on Limerick Drive for 37 years, my wife and I also own a condominium unit at 7200 York Avenue that our son lives in. Our son suffers from a very serious illness and we are his primary care givers, so we travel on York Avenue and the Southdale area daily, sometimes multiple times a day. I must ask: What are you going to do with all the additional TRAFFIC that is circulating in the Southdale area, especially on York Avenue ? ?? The new hotel and condos. The development at 69th and York / Xerxes. And, now, 130 housing units next to the YMCA. The new Best Buy HQ in Richfield added a LOT of traffic a few years back. Now you want MORE traffic, and you throw in those ridiculous "calming" circles on 70th between York and France and the ill conceived new turn signals at 70th and York. All I see is GRIDLOCK. And, when the mayor moves into his new home in the new condos he will be seeing some of that GRIDLOCK. Why the YMCA is getting into the housing business is a separate issue. The traffic that it generates is something else. YMCA hierarchy has already demonstrated their inability to plan ahead when they recently spent $80,000 to lay a new parking lot and now want to tear it up to put a new building on that same parcel of land. So, I doubt that they, too, have given little, if any, thought to traffic levels. I say NAY to the proposed 130 housing units ! Robert J Malby 6517 Limerick Drive Edina, MN 55439 9F 1 -7569 rmalby_�comcast.net 9/30/200R Jackie Hoogenakker From: ROBERT MIAZGA [bbswtman @msn.com] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 1:52 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed YMCA facility and 130 units of housing9Case file 2008 -0012) We have no problem with the construction of a new 2 or 3 story YMCA building, but It appears from the furnished microscopic sized drawing that the proposed building will be at least 870 feet tall. We are vehemently opposed to the construction of another high rise building in close proximity to our building at 7200 York. The esthetic beauty of this neighborhood is being slowly destroyed in the name of private and public greed. It seems to us that Edina Planning Commission will not be satisfied until all the streets in this area are reduced to canyons boxed in by high rises. Please do not grant approval for this project as proposed. Sincerely From Bob & Judy Miazga BBSWTMAN @msn.com o/1000OR John & Janet Bohan October 1, 2008 Members of Planning Commission RE: Redevelopment of YMCA site at 7355 York Avenue 0�) \Z:)�\\09 We have read the Teague Staff Report and suggest that Planning Commissioners seek answers to the following questions that are of great interest to residents of Edina, particularly those who live nearby the proposed development: 1) Notice of August 28 Neighborhood Meeting: When was notice mailed? Given the magnitude and impact on the community of this project, why was notice limited to those within 1,000 feet? How many residents were notified? How many property owners? How many property renters? 2) The YMCA proposes a new facility "to accommodate growth ". Yet the proposed 73,000 square is only 4% larger than the present 70,000 square feet. This does not provide for material growth. 3) Why is this a joint project of the YMCA and Common Bond? 4) Who is Common Bound? What is their mission? Do they currently operate properties in Edina? Elsewhere? 5) Who will own the buildings? Who will own the land? 6) Who will manage the apartment building? 7) Describe apartment layouts. Square footage? # Bedrooms? # Baths? 8) What will be initial lease terms? Renewal terms? 9) What subsidies will be provided? By whom? For how long? 10) How will apartments be "allocated to people with physical disabilities ?" By whom? 11) In addition to rezoning, approval of a number of variances are requested. To qualify for variances, Applicant is required by the City Code and State Statute to demonstrate "Undue hardship ". A review of proposed construction plans suggests to us that that any hardship is caused by applicants' attempt to build too much on the subject site. This is not "undue hardship" as we interpret the Code and Statute. Respectfully submitted, Job vw & Ja4W-t 8Cha w 800 COVENTRY PLACE • EDINA, MN • 55435 -5641 PHONE: 952 - 921 -0338 • FAX: 952 - 831 -3888 E -MAIL: BOHANJOHN @AOL.COM ISCOD Minnesota State Council on Disability Edina Planning Commission Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 October 17, 2008 Members of the City Council and Planning Commission of Edina; On behalf of the Minnesota State Council on Disability ( MSCOD) I want to indicate our strong support for the proposed redevelopment project on the site of the current YMCA at 7355 York Ave. MSCOD is a State agency and our primary purpose is to represent the issues and concerns of Minnesotans with disabilities throughout the State. From our statewide perspective, MSCOD has witnessed a distinct shortage of affordable and accessible housing for the ever growing population of persons with disabilities. The disability community represents one of the largest protected classes in the state and affordable, accessible housing is an ongoing critical concern in this community. Individuals at every income level who have age related disabilities and newly disabled individuals comprise a large portion of this community and many are seeking appropriate, accessible housing for the first time. Many others find that as their disabilities progress they need to secure more accessible housing. It is truly important that communities respond to this growing need and provide the uncompromising leadership necessary to make affordable, accessible housing a reality. I applaud the Common Bond partnership and feel confident that their involvement and proven track record will make this a successful venture for all. Sincerely, P J"�4� J Willshire, utive Director .296.6785 V/TTY 1.800.945.8913 VMY 651.296.5935 Fax www.disability.state.mn.us council.disability@state.mn.us Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper Your technical assistance' & training resource 121 East 7th Place, Suite 107, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Thomas Kessler 814 Chapman Ave Pasadena, CA 91103 Property owner of 7429 York Terrace, Edina MN 55435 To: EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Regarding: Response to proposed Rezoning 7355 York Avenue 9/29/2008 My name is Tom Kessler and I have been a homeowner of 7429 York Terrace for around 8 years now. My career just last year has taken me temporarily away from my home and I currently reside in Pasadena, California. I had begun to forget about how the neighborhood was doing but once we saw the proposed rezoning letter that came in the mail we were shook at the impact it would not only have to my property but the neighborhood. The fields at the end of the YMCA property where my nephew plays soccer and his parent's park in the lot next to the fields would be more low- income housing and a giant parking structure? This would cast shadows on the area in my neighborhood and bring more crime back to the area that we had finally started to see get better but is yet still a problem. A parking ramp would be a haven for yet more Crime. I have worked hard with other neighbors and have strongly persisted to make the neighborhood better on our unique half -block on the edge of Edina to invest not only in the property but the other residents who have wanted the same for their property and homes, for many of my neighbors have lived there much longer my 8 years and have made much larger property investments. A new YMCA — Yes! The summer of 2006 we saw thousands of dollars go into a brand new massive tear up and redo of the YMCA parking lot, all this is throwaway in these tough financial times, well I guess times aren't so tough if you're non - profit? Commonbond secured cheap financing of $60 million dollars from US Bancorp at 5.5% years a couple of years back. Great then why not give to the renewal of the existing YMCA layout and ditch adding townhomes and improve the existing Yorkdale Townhomes? Wasn't that what the money was for anyway? (See letter on 4/25/2006 and attached newspaper article) Building more Commonbond townhomes — Absolutely Not! Expand elsewhere please and take care.of the mess and problem that you have already with Yorkdale townhomes first! We've all put improvements in our houses except why are there no improvements in Yorkdale townhomes and the neighborhood? A proposal was made to tear down the complex and rebuild it mixed with senior housing in a street facing design engaging York Avenue, we all applauded that and that's what we saw as a solution for a still very high crime rate and many unresolved and ongoing problems and issues. (See attached United Properties proposal from 2007) Rezoning for more Commonbond Townhomes is bad and here's why: In our opinion this is just ignoring one big problem and creating another for the residents of Edina. The number one concern is for the safety of the Homeowners of York Terrace and the poor design and planning of Commonbond with their existing Yorkdale Townhomes and proposal to expand and extend their footprint on the neighborhood. This proposal is a full encroachment of the entire half block of 75th Avenue, York Terrace and 74th Avenue with Commonbond Townhouses and an extension of the development known as Yorkdale Townhomes that already occupies 76th Avenue and up to 74th Avenue It would completely surround and increase the amount of low- income residents and raise crime in an already saturated area of low income housing. Unfortunately Commonbond has a poor track record with managing crime in this complex through tenant screening and rules and it shows in the numbers: Crime highlights from Yorkdale Townhomes 2002 -2006: Over 70 Edina Police calls a year on average, highest being 111 in one year: (See attached Police statistics and reports) • Crimes of assault including a shooting • Drug dealing and numerous child abuse cases • Property crimes including my own house that was burglarized in 2002 • 100's of nuisance calls and disturbances Track record and history of mismanagement of Yorkdale Townhomes by Commonbond: A dedicated Edina police liaison reports every Thursday to manage issues at the cost of the taxpayers rather than property management at Commonbond expense. Lack of a full time property manager to "Manage" low- income troublemaker tenants where Commonbond has only assigned a one to two -day a week person for a couple of hours. Commonbond has been unwilling to be "Good Neighbors" to resolve many issues: (See attached letters from 12/12/2005 and 12/27/2005) Refused to layout a clear boundary of where the townhouses end to help resolve parking issues where tenants refused to park in their own lot and would park on York Terrace. We were able to get no parking signs posted with partition. Still refuse to create a physical barrier (fence, landscaping) between Yorkdale Townhomes Parking Lot and York Terrace to address nuisances in parking lot and drive over's across grass onto York Terrace street. Many of the ongoing problems of the residents are from poor planning and design to integrate within residential settings that were made back in 1987. Even townhouse complexes in the for - profit arena have full time management staff and strive to work with their neighbors. We've made progress over the last couple of years on taking the neighborhood back from crime and mismanagement, yet they still refuse to manage their residents properly When are Commonbond going to step up and fix or improve what they have? Let's talk about improving the record and their current problem before we allow them to add more chaos to Edina. Where is the City of Edina's feasibility study on how this is going to impact the neighborhood? I've provided tons of facts and evidence here. I think the resident's deserve some due diligence on the real impact of this proposal. A parking ramp with more low- income townhouses is bad for the neighborhood and it's bad for Edina. Sincerely, Tom Kessler cc: Residents of York Terrace (VICOU RAG E 11 CENTER Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 October 17, 2008 Members of the City Council and Planning Commission of Edina, I am writing to express Courage Center's strong support for the proposed redevelopment project on the site of the current YMCA at 7355 York Ave. As an organization serving more than 1 1,000 individuals with chronic and complex medical conditions at all points on the age continuum, we are acutely aware of the challenges of housing affordability our clients often face. When we consider the barriers to accessibility those with functional limitations also encounter, the housing options available to this growing segment of our community narrow significantly. We are excited to see another exciting Common Bond partnership emerge to create additional housing stock for this underserved population. As they did with the recent Kingsley Commons project, Common Bond has reached out to the organizations serving potential project tenants for their advice and counsel. That the location is in the heart of a vibrant entertainment and commercial district with easy access to multiple transit lines is also worth celebrating. Demand for these units will be high. We applaud Common Bond, the YMCA, and the city of Edina for your foresight in addressing one of the leading policy challenges facing our growing community of those of all ages in need of accessible and affordable housing. We stand ready to advocate strongly for its construction and operational success. Sincerely, Jan Malcolm CEO 15 Golden Volley Rood inneopolis, M nnesoto 55422 p: 763 588 0811 CourogeCenter.org METROPOLITAN INTERFAITH COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING "Do justice, love mercy, walk humbly with your God." Micah 6:8 MICAH 1r;q 121r October 301h, 2008 Planning Commission and City Council c/o Cary Teague City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Commission and Council Members: MICAH sincerely hopes that you will support the proposed redevelopment of the Southdale YMCA site that will include accessible and affordable housing for people with multiple sclerosis and other physical disabilities. Most people in need of affordable housing are working individuals and families, earning less than $40,000 /year. Administrative assistants and teachers, firefighters and bank tellers, nursing assistants and sales clerks typically need affordable housing because of the gap between what they earn and what housing costs. Others who need affordable housing include individuals living on fixed incomes, persons with disabilities and special needs, and families on government assistance. CommonBond Communities' proposal for new affordable rental housing would allow Edina to meet the needs of working individuals and families as well as those with special needs. We truly believe this redevelopment effort will be a tremendous asset to the City of Edina, the YMCA and its members, and for people who will value the accessible living options it would provide. Sincerely, Adele Della Torre MICAH Board Member Phone: (612)1 ;71 -8980 Minnesota Church Center Fax: (612) 8 ;70 -2634 122 West Franklin Avenue, Suite 310 &mail: In(oOm 9cah org Minneapolis, MN 55404 www.mlicah.org Dr. Kay L. Briden 3330 Edinborough Way Apt 907 Edina, MN 55435 November 7, 2008 Edina Planning Commission Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council of Edina: As a resident of Edina and a member of the Board of Trustees of The National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Minnesota Chapter, I strongly support the redevelopment of the Southdale YMCA and the plans to add accessible apartments to it. During my years on the Board, and as a member of the Chapter Programs Committee, we have continually identified and addressed the need for appropriate housing for people with disabilities of varying income levels. As someone who has personally lived with MS for a number of years, I know how challenging living with a disability and the search for accessible housing can be. As our community leaders, you have a tremendous opportunity to create a national wellness- housing model — a model that helps meet a real need — and connects people with disabilities to convenient exercise programs that can provide therapeutic value and improve functional ability. I support you in making this happen in our city. Sint cerely, Dr. Kay Braden Edina Resident YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Association Services 30 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 612- 371 -8700 fax: 612- 371 -8716 November 10, 2008 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 v YMCA 1Ne build strong kids, swogg families, strong communities RE: YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Southdale YMCA Redevelopment Project Preliminary Development Review Request for an Extension to the 120 Day Rule Dear Mr. Teague, We are in receipt of your 60 -day extension letter for the YMCA's submitted Preliminary Development Review for the Southdale Redevelopment project. We understand the 60 day extension is in addition to the 60 -day required review period of the City. Please accept this letter on behalf of the YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis as a request to extend the 120 day review of the Preliminary Development Application by an additional 60 days. It is the intent of the YMCA to be heard at the December 30"' Planning Commission meeting and the January City Council Meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Anita Lancello- Bydlon VP of New Development, YMCA December 9.200' Edina City Panning Commission 401 W. 50' Street =1ina. MN 55424 To Whom It May Concern: I wish to declare my very strong support for the redevelopment of the Southdale YMCA site to include a mixed use facility. This area is ideal for this sort of facility and I, as a long -time Edina resident. would be proud to live in a community that welcomes and lends a helping hand to people and families with disabilities. Kann G. Perry U 5732 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 `a� Edina City Planning Office Edina City Hall 4801 West 501h Street Edina MN 55424 October 16, 2008 Dear Cary Teague: I wanted to voice my strong support for the proposed housing community adjacent to the Southdale YMCA, to be developed by CommonBond Communities. I understand that this development would contain 104 additional affordable housing units for Edina, which the City Council endorsed at the September 16 work session as moving toward a goal of 212 affordable housing units throughout Edina by 2030. For several years, I have attended sessions of the Edina Affordable Housing Initiative and profited from discussions led by Carol Mork, Doug Mayo and others with knowledge and commitment on this topic. I have also attended a number of Edina Planning Commission hearings as they grappled with development issues, including the amount.of and where to site affordable housing in our community. I am pleased this development will be going forward and appreciate your leadership on the Planning Commission. My husband, Michael Bromer, joins me in applauding the development of the entire Southdale area, including this Southdale YMCA Redevelopment proposal with 130 housing units, 104 of which will be affordable. Thank you for your attention to this Carol Bromer 6521 Creek Drive Edina MN 55439 952 - 941 -6673 cfbromerna .comcast.net December 11, 2008 Dear Members of the Edina Planning Commission, As twenty year residents of the city of Edina we have so enjoyed all that this wonderful city has to offer. We would like to have a diverse community, serving people with various needs and at different income levels. We support the proposed YMCA partnership with Common Bond to develop a mixed -use facility at the current YMCA site. We have known of and respected the work of Common Bond for many years. Their properties are well built and very well maintained and would only be an asset in the Edina area. Thank you for considering our request. Sincerely, Mary Lou Caskey Dennis Caskey 4350 Brookside Ct. #321 Edina, Mn 55436 02 ------------—--------------—---—- PARKING, 1? K T I I I I oo 0 5p" NEW AN YMCA 19 RO 00 VT -r I/ I I CURRENT 40 I Y a ' 0. .46 COMMONBOND - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pedestrian Travel Distance Diagram Current Building and New Building Southdale YMCA, Mixed-Use Fkil V Neighborhood Residents of York Terrace, Edina c/o Thomas Kessler 7429 York Terrace Edina, MN 55435 612.597.7330 Monday, December 12, 2005 Richard Hutsell Commonbond Communities 328 W. Kellogg Blvd St. Paul MN 55102 RE: Yorkdale Town homes residents street use of 74th - 75th Avenues and York Terrace Dear Sir, We would like your cooperation in alleviating the following complaints. It is our attempt to raise these concerns to you and your staff to find an administrative solution to help address these issues and concerns promptly. It is our hope that you will work together with us and the City of Edina in these and future issues as they may arise. We recently contacted the city and a call was placed to Edina Mayor Jim Hovland on 12/9/05. These complaints were raised and discussed and he has indicated that the Police Chief will be notified to investigate further. Complaints: 1) Town home residents are parking on the street along 75th Avenue and York Terrace, including some residents regularly parking overnight. 2) Town home residents are accessing the drive and exceeding speed limits on 74th /75th Avenues and York Terrace. 3) Town home residents are creating congestion and unsafe conditions on the narrow private drive and minimal maintenance road. 4) Town home residents are driving over the lawn from parking lot onto York Terrace roadway. 5) Town home residents are pulling into driveways and lawns to turn around on street creating a nuisance and disturbance. 6) Town home residents are being instructed from Commonbond Management to park on 75th and York Terrace for parking lot maintenance and snow removal. A return call was given with resolutions from Edina Chief of Police, Michael Siitari on 12/12/05. During the discussion with me he said that although it is a public street, 74th - 75th Avenues and York Terrace are acknowledged as a private drive for homeowners and were not designed for vehicular access to the Yorkdale town homes or by it's residents. To enforce this he indicated he would support the following: 1. Communicate with police liaisons that are currently patrolling Yorkdale town homes of the recent homeowners' complaints and to ticket violators and issue citations for any of the following: a. Parking on the streets other than the designated parking lot as a "6 hour parking maximum" law violation, which should deter future parking of regular individuals. b. Driving on lawns or "off street driving" law violations per report or witnessed act as seen or called in as a observation by a homeowner. c. Pulling in driveways or on lawns as a "public nuisance or disturbance" law violation per report by homeowner or observation. 2. Employ traffic safety consultants to study residence traffic and ensure street residents are only using private street per chief city engineer Wayne Houle's recommendation. 3. Snow removal or maintenance will need to be addressed using Commonbond property, streets are not to be used as overflow. They will ticket snow emergency law violators as it applies to streets and is in effect following or during snowfall. We appreciate the time to address these concerns and acknowledge that it is your goal is to work together with it's neighbors. We hope that the action you take may alleviate these concerns and the need to pursue further action. Your cooperation addressed administratively and with site management will ensure compliance to alleviate these complaints. Sincerely, Thomas Kessler c/o Residents of York Terrace, Edina Thomas Kessler 7429 York Terrace Edina, MN 55435 RE: Acknowledged list of complaints via letter and follow -up conversation on future actions and steps from Commonbond December 27, 2005 Richard Hutsell, Vice President Housing Commonbond Communities 328 West Kellogg Blvd St. Paul MN 55102 Linda Sperry, Commonbond Site Manager Yorkdale Town homes 7429 York Avenue Edina, MN 55435 Phone discussions on 12/19/2005 with Linda Sperry: She first informed me that she had received my letter and our conversation started out. She wants us to let her know that definitely if anyone was driving across the parking lot to inform her. I said we would raise it with the police first and include her as well. She also told me there maintenance man (Roy) noticed the tracks from the lot to the street and has been piling up snow as a barricade to prevent future efforts. I suggested that this was a good temporary solution but a more permanent barricade like a fence or trees or combination of both needs to be put in place as it has been occurring year round. I am going to bring this up with Richard Hutsell for a needed improvement from the property management budget of Commonbond. She indicated that she didn't know about the 6 hour parking law and she indicated that some residents had received tickets already. Then she said the residents may not park overnight but may stay within that window and return to park on the streets. I said we didn't think that was acceptable and suggested that Commonbond needs to take administrative action to make it a requirement of the leasing or rental agreement to prohibit this. She then said that this may be discrimination of the residents and that would not meet a HUD standard and all the other documents that they need to comply with. I asked her if commercial for profit entities can require it then why not them? She said it would be raised with Richard Hutsell and others at Commonbond then after the first of the year. I said the homeowners are fed up and have an inference of where the townhouse zoning ends and their homesteads reside. Every resident would like some kind of a barrier from the street and the parking lot and some enforced resident adherence to parking in the lot and not on the street. This was stated with many examples from the police chief who also agrees that the drive was designed for the houses along York Terrace and not the town homes. As he also indicated that he wouldn't want townhouse residents parking, pulling into driveways, driving over lawns, speeding on the street or any other disruptive or disorderly behavior there either. He assured me that he supported our cause. I gave Linda some of my own history that I had witnessed since 2000 when I purchased the house. 1) That my house was broken into the my third year there. Where the Commonbond maintenance crew witnessed and even noticed a bike the thief left on the town home property and watched the suspicious individual going up to each homeowners door and intern did nothing to prevent it, 2) There was a shooting just three years ago of multiple 9mm shots fired and I was alarmed when many Edina police officers had shotguns drawn across my front yard in the parking lot telling me to get back in my house as I was loading my golf clubs into my car, 3) There are still cars driving by full of young kids buying drugs regularly and, 4) Someone (woman in black Chrysler Concorde) just a couple of weeks ago driving down the street at over 40 miles an hour almost hitting me. I went on to say there are families in some of these houses and am planning to raise mine there as well. There are also two new residents that have moved into the neighborhood in the past two years and many people that have spent a lot of time and money making major improvements to the houses too. I have spent over $40K in home improvements myself. I told her the homeowners have a lot invested in our homes and with the neighborhood changing and improving and we want Yorkdale town homes to change and improve with it as a deterrent to curbing future crimes. She said that she would be more than happy to sit down with the Mayor to talk about these issues. I told her that before we sit down we need to see some action first and that we would be more than happy to sit and talk about it, right now we are angry and think there are plenty of things that Commonbond needs to do to first to prove to us that they are good neighbors as they say. We would like to see some actions taken as good faith efforts to resolve these complaints prior to working together and to share with us in the actions taken within the complex. Feeling much resistance to our concerns I felt the need to inform her that they (Commonbond) are a non- profit organization and there mandate is to work together with there neighbors and that we have the support of the Mayor and other city officials and that these issues have been raised before and we expect some action. Then she said they were not raised with her, I wholly disagreed and told her we had raised them many times over the past five years and prior to me becoming a resident. Especially after the shooting incidence and additionally I remember myself calling after a domestic disturbance and talking with her specifically just last summer. Then I asked her why only the southern residents were parking along 75th Avenue and York Terrace and not the northern residents who are actually closer to the street. Linda said she could probably tell me which residents are parking on 75th and told me the silver Explorer SUV was parked in the corner, a black Chrysler Concorde and others and if I could let her know she would pursue them. I agreed that we would provide to her the vehicles if she took action. Then I raised the issue that someone had been plowing private paths to and from the 75th Avenue and York Terrace and she indicated that they shouldn't be and that she will look into having that stopped as well. I also brought up that someone needs to monitor the residents and a part time site manager is not enough to enforce the rules and regulations that the residents need to follow. This should not be the burden of the special liaison of the Edina police either. No Resident Parking signs along the streets with Commonbond's name on the signs is another alternative to the parking problem that I suggested as well. The conversation came to a close with Linda saying that she would get in contact with people at Commonbond after the holidays to start working on some solutions. Message left on 12/20/2005 from Richard Hutsell: He agreed that there is something that can be put in the rental/occupation agreement with the residents and will revise that. He will be visiting after the Christmas holiday to become more acquainted with the property and invited me to attend to discuss what can be done. I left a return call on 12/21/2005 and a VM to have him talk with me if I am home when he looks at the property and to contact me. Here is a listing of recent vehicles parking along 75`h Avenue and York Terrace: Make Model Color Buick Century Dark Red Chrysler Concorde Black Dod a Caravan Blue w/ wood Ford Explorer Gray Land Rover Discovery Dark Red Mazda 626 Dark Red Mercedes 190 Blue Saab 9000 White We look forward to working together in the future and in the coming new year. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. Any correspondence, communication or future discussions in the following weeks ahead is welcomed. Sincerely, Thomas Kessler T- 612.597.7330 cc: Mayor, James Hovland Police Chief, Michael Siitari Residents of York Terrace c/o Thomas Kessler 7429 York Terrace Edina, MN 55435 Richard Hutsell, Vice President of Property Management Klea Hinchcliffe, Property Manager Commonbond Communities 328 W. Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55102 Klea, Z�loglzea Thanks for speaking with me today. Attached is a summary of our conversation and again we hope that Commonbond will work with the neighbors to resolve these two top issues. These are again issues stated from other concerns raised and previous discussion with Richard Hutsell over the past 6 months. We would like action taken on these issues in the short term of 2006 by Commonbond management for resolution of these concerns. 1) PARKING LOT ISSUES Residents have been driving across the parking lot onto York Terrace in numerous locations. In addition, parking lot activity and disruptions such as car alarms, headlights, loud verbal discussions, car stereos and loud vehicles create a disturbance to the neighborhood. The residents again state that there needs to be a physical barrier between the parking lot and York Terrace. This should run the full distance of the parking surface and include a fence and or foliage. The residents would like to approve the design that Commonbond presents and work together for a solution that pleases both parties. 2) ROADWAY RESURFACE 75th Avenue, York Terrace and 70 Avenue is a low maintenance public road that needs repair. We have asked that all residents sign the petition to have the road repaired and according to the City of Edina there will be an assessment to all bordering properties on the thoroughfare. An estimate of costs is being sent from the City of Edina along with a petition that will be walked in the following month of May with the estimated costs. Since Yorkdale Townhomes reside along the public street of 75th Avenue and York Terrace. The residents have access and are directed to use this road for overflow, personal use, snow clearing and general access for lack of parking permits. We would expect Commonbond to participate in their share of the assessment and hope for a signature on the petition. The Southdale YMCA which borders on 70 Avenue upon a recent discussion has agreed to sign and support their share. Working together we have and will make the neighborhood safe, pleasant and enjoyable place for all neighbors to live. As I spoke of on the phone we will follow up in two weeks to discuss the progress and present the road petition for signing. As stated in the attached article from today's business section, there seem to be an ample supply of equity funds to address these overdue improvements. Residents on the street have taken equity out to improve their houses and we would expect the same cons§'derobn from Commonbond. cc: `Mayor of Edina, James Hovland Chief Engineer, Wayne Houle in annual . the agree- - imposing ions. swamed ed. D2 P- ices ►sion ;mch ilmulation M suffer from *d of them . th=apy- r Meoltronic CaI meeting pbminstimr Uplewiththe '"Mon. wmllcA the I Clinic and lei Hospital Its were en- 9w,ai of the nrcherhopes !&M No. !MbmDZ. eflorise.: DAVIDDIRMSM &MWstff@8t8rtrftme-coM ftsoon -flwaVff*gtmm-w.enav atec-�� i,%*of willhaveneW, kemancIng wM enahIe cQkc rofit Qro a np al l ie: 1 kre w nt, • CommonBond celebrates its 35th year with a big refinancing and prepares to say goodbye to founder Joe Erri90- ON BUSINESS NEAL ST. ANTHONY CommonBond communi- ties, the Twin Cities area!s larg- est nonprofit developer/owner of affordable rental housing, has found a substantive Way to celebrate its 35th year in business. Sure, there's a fundraising Salmon May 19 at the Depot to celebrate 4,000 units Of safe, we),-Maintained apartments and oth- er homes. But as part of the festivities, Common - Bond also recently refinanced about a third of its housing portfolio at a lower interest rate that will permit the organization to re- invest some of the savings to renovate about 1,300 of its oldest units - With Us. Bancorp as the lender of about $60 million in 5.5 percent financing, Com- monBond has done what Chief Operating officer Joe Holmberg said is the largest such multi-complex refinancing in the na- tion. CommonBond will take some equity out of the refinancing and, combined with reduced interest payments, underwrite im - provements at 17 older housing complex- es that are part of the 54 developments it owns in 33 communities in and around the Twin Cities. the financial expertise of the Common - Bond Bondstaffmadethisa for US. Bancorp," said Gerry Thole, a bank senior vice president and CommonBond board member. -rho enables CommonBond to preserve housing for the long haul" 9L Autbmy Conthnws: First and only presi- dent redringthis'year.D5 P- investinent, report finds State lags m venture capita furi&ngshowed • AreportOnfirstl�lafterventmcaPta' VENTURE FUNEIDIG FALLS IN THE FEW-QUARTER national Strength but weakness m Minnesota, with just five deals. in Minnesota fell in the fourth quarter, with five Venturecapamr-P-41, . avemingfndmgtwngs4m�gnuibmThenLunberofcmnPames companies BYSUSAN L PETERSON receiving funding was the lowest since the third quarter of M5. Nationally, a capital funding total of 761 companies received $5.6 billion in venture DORM JwI Pst I " (quartexly,dollarsinrngions) $150 ... .. .. .... . . ...... T Sill" 200 so 0 2004 2005 .06 Compodnfund" (quarterly) - ........... . 4 5 T 2004 2005 '06 -V three Mhmesata Wag" sect= Dells �bfa1 dical devices and consumer doh m millions) --WgM@M'r -" ioducts and services companies b . I I S20.0 While venture capital invest- ments maintained a healthy Pace nationally in the first quarter, Min- nesota venture capitalists mostly sal on their checkbooks. The number of deals in the state slippedtoanll-yearlawoffimcmw pared with 14 in the year-ago quart= according to the Moneyll-ee report by PricewaterhouseCOOPers. and deals worth $5.6 billion in the quar- teL The value of the deals was lev- el with the previous; quart= but UP 12 percent from first-quarter 2005, while the .number of investments was up n percent from a year 390- In Minnesota+ total investment was down 13 percent, to $48.9 Mil- lion, from first- quarter 2005- The to,- tal included two sizable deals � one in medical devices and one in . con- suroierprCldlictsand Jay Ham a partner at pricewAWouse- toms.asnerm��� searchers gopnea ror au a­- +-- - erX;psberg Rat lnB a Ewa _ � }o, r new n. T• ome on p r � h6tAing . .�A r in S Pail, gZ. ANTHONY FRbN Di tIDrt ' — yam, - . a building, !sad fdkn'rdto 'ate sea 1'L ahome t PO F t s first And. anlY a . Co dpmg foro resrdl.1 b. is a ca- add fen o peer ih ZpOf' aRer - �� .and man B g C Wn p�'i lects► PS to _ lep 4 ner "tom etc ]Pau s, flrentli in: c6hp . LfL� -. i�!•: r—�. , .�:i'r���tQe QSi`!ai`�'r��p -, " t tib 7� Cams , arm Bch : agoPle a "(folic .Ardis Of tire' �raveimivol+(d w _incamae" rear Ai nibe, A under' a basin Dart at the ? &f ess en melt vdais getting ' beba o� g�'aher . of bading and ovm. ing Fes- and was turf �'r the modest ;::: housin&...f ..ttvd8.. Mg .tu tl�. sabs� ; �,ge��era�0°�ild 4 &es=d rmto a CPA and wter- � 'chief -ftwm> off started, 19.A 40-7m arc ' mo4iBoit , NOW EseC Ft�al ao gages and 40 rega>rtelf?i12 tian8subsidylP ems` ess C4 7W eipL. ofPWVi �reoo► b forwoS has to suit . . * . tare pt t>�at people with gy .19'18; I of about $2 nilf aeon- become "• sin � y� slarSeb►r. , p ` alth true tr housed in lAw�crofit °tiPaola gm owned �' bnildir K .. a.: , tiesigned 7; p leave each �& irate housing Source of number -of �ctronss� .achipye.be�t =-M rental ion ]bnrW.said:'. . time, a number of bUND9 Own jobs, Com�onBond era housed low >n- elders Amd W1iA..fO&*. subsidy._ ,aioae; makes them gv�aaf�ua11Y' or about; ter 2b. oat 30 the.. � is J ",QQ,oQi}ytO,OYCISee a. ` A health partner malo Introducing the affordable, national solu Finally,.a simpler way to save on health no matter where your employees live an, `'how you:,can offer consistent, quality he coverage from an alliance of the country ,health care organizations. co alliance di 'to deliver, an efficient, low -cost solan ad seamless national network, one p t-an tin at 952- 883 -5200 or go online to YORK TERRACE UPDATE August 9, 2006 Hello residents of York Terrace! Here is an update on the latest "going's on" for York Terrace 1 75th and 74th Avenues. NEW ROADWAY Hey it's great to see the new road! The resurface was completed in June and was done without special assessment to the residents. What a great improvement this makes. BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS AND PARKING LOT ISSUES In my last letter I spoke of the following disturbances and nuisance issues from the parking lot along the boulevard: Loud vehicles without mufflers or exhaust Loud music or subwoofers Working on cars Shouting, yelling Headlights, Horns, Car alarms Driving over boulevard from /to parking lot and street Suspicious activity or drug dealing Littering and debris Numerous police cars answering calls After talking with Klea Hinchdiffe at Commonbond and Linda Sperry the part-time site manager they are proposing placing large boulders, landscaped with ground level foliage the full length of the corner to the trees, which will alleviate the driving across the boulevard. However this doesn't really solve the problems from the parking lot. I talked with Klea about the proposal and I iterated that this really doesn't address many of the other issues, suggesting that fences or tall trees would really be the solution. She said they are NOT going to put up a fence. I asked why not? First she said that they did not have enough money for anything but the boulders. I said that's hard to believe given the recent refinance of their property holdings, she told me that the Yorkdale units are on a budget with the rest of their properties for improvements. Klea went on saying that this is not a top priority for this property and they will do what they want with the money... (continued next page) (3) ... since the city wide 6 hour parking law really is difficult to enforce, especially since the tickets are dismissed in court. He is preparing a survey for all 7 homeowners only not Commonbond or its residents. This will arrive in the mail within the next week or so with many different recommendations he has made on parking. They will include the following scenarios: - Either No Parking west side of street (not in front of townhouses) Which means anyone can park in front of your house -Or- No Parking east side of street (not in front of houses) This means no one can park in front of the townhouse property -In addition- No Parking entire street This would prevent any parking from townhome residents and require homeowner parking off street No Parking specific hours of day (like between 8am through 4pm) Please take the time and fill out the survey, this is your chance to be heard and help to keep improving the neighborhood. Well that's all for now... You're Neighbor, Tom Kessler 612.866.6235 torus as,aeruicu •,r,•r.. -•-T - lied for an ate• ��^ ry.:Asberg Rating �•e•a searchers app^ y . Time of renew or y hottgIng rdfit nonp �3 ST. ANTHONY FRbM Di unit Skyline'IbwM in St Paul, a building that had fallen into deb ���''�, #�' `'_�'' s' �iiion • sehdff'` tahome Joe - �p Cotes first and only +�andrefuriyishmetrt resident, who is calling it a ca-.. * for Sno lo�v ihcome milre P ; r in .addition .to, develo ping a a 16� • reer. is 2006 a8er + de- YO'fi'.:c Ins leftajoD s'dPlan' M+ arger dev _P 1, ner at i of n cotomunitie9`� Housing: x _ Maple Grave .9 Y exn f Ioe1l w psaidtheda"Ste dommuddesftbt �d ; kch�housit Ap edbat- a ftj. arm F ` m •Map J + folic Archdiocese of ' -tle��,g� ev�A some r£w-income " resr St pai& mod l At h � ' d wddd, and ;; ernes was g out of h Buf the aabusiness f building oWn= ";.behavior.- business aastood-,up I and quieted ingpublc housing &rough local was turn: `'the audience by saying he was ; bousing•'agenaes and f h 8 trouble finding modest'' ing -to the. private and" - �, wofloer who could'afford it sectors, lasing mortpW subsi- m.the comet taih►. >`. dies andfederalrent.vouchecsaa;'i; a CP A and vets,- µHciiinberg► incenfive& real „Itwasprettysv a+►ce an iolte � Corw " He said the. art ,tnofi�Bolitil in ll92•: tee.{��,- typicl'ttiiiltitanYP > 'got require lbbrl2 financing �• tion 8 subs►dY }'' :ies andsa slot ire comP1�; srve•Btirtwe're � tbaaap�at��'tdrd�. teamoz+ec� i eiifthliless; F of providu�8 s housing "'N + 40eteal ei= . ' forte f� : ltrd t'. take . M eCt that It lies to sub- people with spequipow ah operating Ats fd of about $2 �' 197'.,`. ,Itsfundrgis�8 i3t1 Y `lion � YeaT age lie iS ly. profit business, • � �g the eduCatioii� housed in low-cost,,- � nseling prs artd building awned by; Ibe, designed th ithpro 1980x.p -fie the "s and earning cg city:, ythe housing 'Ot • l: �sfresid ots fifth o &vdrk aooe the: ole The,govanMV)x "*Ras 'renters leave each source of financang, fmie the . ofSection8, idized y� for market =rate housing °0 Also at that � after they achiLVe b6der -pay-, rental fbutlding awn- ing i� �o said:: ` time, anumber in- The average CommonBond lo* -in- who once horsed resideatp r'�+cludw „elder s come-fAm- ,under' ff. renfer�s 5uraririn8;on Soiia� subsidy �e 4 Seaeun . �ilone, makes about their gvrv'erntescaf �, or about ter oar 30 yeaM , $14,500 aaom►ually the. nrovnera Rrrigr►, �vv>;fo &6 js'taz ` IiL'4td ° •$Mo to,,, oversee a .K rr ndeminiums. . - nea�t>S!�: :fl:..w v;%.::Zte nort+ r . 4. -. ; .. F 4�. r �� 41 y� You don't need to pet( i + S 4 L A health partner maN Introducing the affordable, national solu Finally, a simpler way to save on health no matter where your employees live am `Now you.can offer consistent, qualit coverage from an alliance of the = health care organizations. An alliance di �. to deliver an efficient, low -cost solution seamless national network, one plan ad �sn us at 952 - 853=5200 or 90 online to FAX COVER SHEET r Edina Police Department oe� 4801 West 50t6'-Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 EMERGENCY 911. Non - Emergency ................ ..........................(952) 826 -1600 Administrative ............. ............................... (952) 826 -1610 Investigations ............... ............................... .(952) 826 -1620 FAX N r ............... ............ (952) 826 -1607 ................ D to o Time:' 1 3 5 Total num er o pages including cover sheet: I N �o TO: Department: Q� FAX Number: 2g (P FROM. Comments: The information contained in this facsimile message may be privileged and confidential. If is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is sent. If the person who received this document is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, then any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. if you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S_ Postal e, Run 07/30/2006 Edina Public Safety I ie Run 11:28:43 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Date], -ncy: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: M -,: Rd Year /Num.: :ident Incident Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location •323 01/05/06 18:34 PARKING COMPLAINT / /OT PARKING 7429 York Terrace VIOLATIO BLK CONCORD AND SILV ER EXPLORER ON 75TH ST EAST OF YORK TER E E -2149 02/02/06 26:57 DOMESTIC/ 7407 S. York Avenue rS 0 E R� �Ull�lllllwl�5 1 -8062 04/30/06-02:50 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS / /SS OF LO 7429 S. York Avenue T /GROUP YORKDALE TOWNHOMES , E MMOPMMe Y ww"S ' S 6- 10600 06/02/06 11:44 TERRORISTIC THREATS 11MA= 7429 S. York Avenue YORKDALE TOWNHOMES Pib rCR.PP t"� don - ro`c1�—i v;s LE NIVIPSMES Total Incidents Listed - 14 �1a IL Run _ ,50/2006 Edina Public Safety Run 1130/04 Combined Report - Ordered 8y Incident vat ,cy: ED Edina public safety Service Cade: i Rd Year /Num.: ident Incident Incident Location 9umber Date - Time Incident Nature 5350 03/22/06 21:47 VIOLATE ORDER PROTEC - VIOLATI 7511 S. York Avenue ON OCCURRING VIA TELEPHONE -SUS MIS P AT MOTEL 6 IN RICHFIELD-NAM/ •7114 04/17/06 09:56 ASSAULT /oCC LAST THURSDAY 7545 S. York Avenue E -9061 05/14/06 11:34 THEFT FROM AUTO -CD PLAYER /STER 7503` York YAvenue EO C0I4B0 .9646 05/21/06 15:52 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY 7545 S. York Avenue �H i 7543 S. York Avenue .9897 05/24/06 17:54 DISTURBANCE D i -10020 05/26/06 13:45 TERRORISTIC THREATS // 7543 5. York AvenuE s DIRT BIKE- 7535 S. York Avenue y -10539 06/01/06 17:08 BLUF& /REDCHUFFY BR-BOY D NO SERN- LOCKED TO TREE IN FRONT YARD w /ANOTHER BIKE 7535 S. York Avenue 6 -10592 06/02/06 09:32 THEFT /BICYCLE 6 -10969 06/06/06 15 :55 MISCELLANEOUS S BKE PBCffRETAKENE 7535 S. York Avenue SC BY LANbLORD /913b1 RETURNED /w oULD LIKE TO SPEAK Y /OFFICER Total Incidents Listed - 9 n 07/30/2006 .54ins Public Safety n 10.06.11 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Date ED Edina Public Safety Service Code. Rd Year /Num.: t incident 7437 S. York Avenue -5 -4895 03/13/05 15:22 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC /RED OFFI 7401 s. York Avenue 11krber Date - Time Incident Nature - Incident Location 03/30/05 21:59 DOMESTIC / VERBAL ONLYSUVI1+5 7413 s. York Avenue y NOMMLE MONO 4 e 11 01/16/05 23:08 UNWANTED GUEST/ 41020� R 7427 S. York Avenue 7401 S. York Avenue EFUSING TO LEAVE is .96 013 01/16/05 23:51 UNWANTED GUEST/ 8/M 602 180 7427 S. York Avenue BLK SWEATSHIRT/ JEANS 827 01/28/05 13:03 DOMESTIC / /0lMNM9lF�R/ 7401 S. York Avenue `.x:1929 01/29/0522:47 DOMESTIC/ 000=0� 7407 S. York Avenue 50975 01/30/05 20:56 r� MEDICAL - ANEW 7407 S. York Avenue 5 -3452 02119/05 20:28 Maw RUNAWAY 7401 E�I*� S. York Avenue T Y 5-4837 =MEN"It also=. room 03/12/05 13:05 911 FOLLOW -UPS 7437 S. York Avenue -5 -4895 03/13/05 15:22 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC /RED OFFI 7401 s. York Avenue C1_R TO OWNWINMENNOM 991000M '-S -5077 03/16/05 11:41 RUNAWAY 7401 S. York Avenue %5981 03/30/05 21:59 DOMESTIC / VERBAL ONLYSUVI1+5 7413 s. York Avenue y E MONO 4 e L i � E 7. 07 06/20/05 23:09 DOMESTIC/ 7401 S. York Avenue �A is .96 06/23/05 00:58 RUNAWAY 7401 S. York Avenue ate k., 07/30/2006 Edina Public Safety Run 10:06:14 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Dat� ime Ru , gency: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: ime..: Rd Year /Num.: wan 4 Aq, 2996 V"7444— 74 99 ncident Incident D Number Dote Time Incident Nature Incident Location 5 -19932 09125/05 16:27 WELFARE CHECK // VNEIrMNI rI 7407 S. York Avenue 5 -21021 10/08/05 08:48 PARKING COMPLAINT 7401 York Terrace A�I■1 ob 5-22556 10/29/05 12:23 THEFT FROM AUTO 7409 S. York Avenue e 5 -22820 11/01/05 21:35 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS /PARTY KNO 7427 S. York Avenue CKING ON RPIS DOOR UNKNOWN TO RP/ W/M domm P 5-22935 11/03/05 13:22 FORGERY /ALTERED CHECK 7427 S. York Avenue MEET RP AT 3400 W. 66TH /TCF 5.23119 11/06/05 05:10 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS /LOUD THU 7415 S. York Avenue MP IN HOUSE, CAME FROM DOWNSTA ■rte IRS 5 -24811 12/01/05 13:08 LOST PROPERTY /CELL PHONE 7415 S. York Avenue Now e 5-25990 12/17/05 15:47 WELFARE CHECK // 7407 S. York Avenue MiM Y � � �r�cJ►` C1►. A�Ih.9� Total incidents Listed - 47 0 —IS Ap� 1 i I 9 to Run 07/30/ZO06 Edina Public Safety am Run 11 ;05-26 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Date ;eney: ED Edina Public safety Me..: ;sident Incident : Number Date - Time Incident Nature Service Code: Rd Year /Num.: DOWN 5 -2495 02/14/05 00:27 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS / MALE LO OKING IN WINDOWS /WINTER COAT /H AT WITH FLAPS �t� Illl�wr° Incident Location T 3200 W. 76 Street 5-6077 04/01/05 *am" 11:20 MEDICAL/ 3204 W. 76 Street L 5.6320 04/04/05 20:39 UNWANTED GUEST /FORMER FRIEND, 3222 W. 76 Street REFUSING To LEAVE /CREATING DI A� STURBANCE M� om 5- 7749 04/24/05 13:53 DOMESTIC/ 3234 W. 76 Street 5 -8551 05/05/05 13:46 MEDICAL / 3204 W. 76 street y -10126 05/25/05 now 23:49 DOMESTIC 3266 W. 76 Street 5 -10282 05/27/05 15:57 WARRANT ARREST / ATTEMPTING CO 3244 W. 76 Street NTACT 5 -10301 05/27/05 19:49 DOMESTIC 3262 W. 76 Street be - - I' 5 -10308 05/27105 22:41 DOMESTIC j 3262 W. 76 street S 5.13468 07/06/05 14:07 FOUND ANIMAL /KITTEN 3260 W. 76 Street LWIN, Robert G 5-13540 07/07/05 12:31 911 FOLLOW -UPS 3204 W. 76 Street 20 ALLIED PROFESSIONALS ....,.. .... i... .. 11 M.0 Q Run 07/30/2006 Edina Public Safety : :e Run 06-12.30 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Dot4 •nCy: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: �... Rd Year/Num.: cident incident Number Date - Time Incident Nature incident Location -18189 09/01/04 00:08 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS /SMALL VEN 3256 W. 76 Street ICLE PARKED SIDEWAYS IN LOT sN INING IT'S LIGHTS ON ANOTHER V EHICLE FOR cUITE A WHILE 6 -19969 09/2/04 19:11 911 FOLLOW -UPS 3240 W. 76 street 4 -25741 12/1.2/04 00:05 ASSAULT // 3254 W. 76 Street 4 -25790 12/12/04 11:19 TERRORISTIC.THREATS 3254 W. 76 S rt'eet �r wlo �I�" CAA 4-26752 12/24/04 02:31 DlSTUReANCI: /LOUD PARTY 3254 W. 76 street Total Incidents Listed - 24 .1 to Run 07/30/2006 Edina Public safety me Run 06:11:06 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Dat, tency: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: ._: Rd Tear /Num.: icident Incident ' ) Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location : -6919 04/10104 09:25 911 FOLLOW-UPS MOM 7517 S. York Avenue 4 -8133 04/27/04 11:35 THEFT /OF IDENTITY 7519 S. York Avenue 4 -10063 05/22/04 19:09 911 FOLLOW -UPS // DOMESTIC i 7511 s. York Avenue 4 -16148 08/05/04 11:26 MEDICAL / 7539 S. York Avenue 4 -17476 08/22/04 18:12 MEDICAL mummodumm 7553 S. York Avenue wo WOO wommum 4 -17697 08/25/04 14:57 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY /4WN0ft0 7537 S. York Avenue 4- 18174 08/31/04 19:26 DOMESTIC / 7511 S. York Avenue d 4 -19082 09/12104 01:05 DISTURBANCE // 7517 s. York Avenue 4 -19604 09/18/04 14:57 ASSAULT 150M 7543 S. York Avenue m 1�8tib 4 -23407 11/09/04 07:39 RUNAWAY 7517 S. York Avenue 4.23464 11/09/04 19:24 FOUND PERSON 7517 S. York Avenue r�ti �M/SiM1 Total Incidents Listed - 24 Edina Public Safety e Run 07/30/2006 R Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Date e Run 06:07:12 my: ED Edina Public Safety Service Codes Rd Year /Kum -! :ident Incident incident Location Number Date - Time Incident Nature -24868 11/30/04 12:21 MOTORIST ASSIST /LIC /JFD107 7429 S. York Avenue 16:56 VEHICLE LOCKOUT / BABY LOCKED 74 York Avenue -25648 12/10/04 INSIDE 12/11/04 00:21 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 1/900M 7427 S. York Avenue -25668 �E E • S E 12/27104 03:26 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY /Aim"MI IN 7425 S. York Avenue 4 -26903 YR 12/27104 10:02 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY /r0� 7425 S. York Avenue 4 -26918 18:19 SUSP CIRCWSTANCES /Aft�I 7425 S. York Avenue 4-27026 12/28104 1tlA•�I�w 20,09 AUTO THEFT / R 7427 S. York Avenue 4 -27245 12/31/04 5 Total incidents Listed 5�9 r L ',� 3(0 Run 07/3012006 Edina Public Safety c Run 06:07:10 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Date, ncy: ED Edina public Safety service Cade: Rd Year /Hum.: A dent Incident Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location 7798 04/22/04 17:45 THEFT FROM AUTO 7429 s. York Avenue YoRKbALE TOWNHOMES •7813 04/22/04 20:53 ANIMAL COMPLAINTS // INJURED 0 7429 s. York Avenue UCK YORKDALE TOWNHOMES •8019 04/25/04 23:07 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS //4 6M MI 7427 S. York Avenue D 201S WITH FLASHLIGHT N OF 41001pw RP'S ADDRESS NEAR RP'S CAR -8027 04/26/04 06:02 MISSING PERSON //1111111110� 7403 S. York Avenue r 0 - 8155 04/27/04 17,38 DISTURBANCE 7401 S. York Avenue T -8181 04/28/04 02:24 MEDICAL E 7401 S. York Avenue -8617 05/03/04 20:18 RUNAWAY 7401 York Terrace -8987 =OEM Now 05/08/04 16:27 PARKING COMPLAINT // MN LIC /CZ 7405 York Terrace T900 OTP, GREY MAZDA PROT EGE PARKED IN FRONT OF ADDR555 -9565 05/16/04 11:52 PARKING COMPLAINT /PARKED ON ST 7405 York Terrace REET OVER SIX HOURS /GRY MAZDA •1 - 10976 06/03/04 09:30 HAZMAT - GAS /GAS LEAK II4000 7405 York Terrace -11271 fie& damawm alkL 06/06/04 17:28 VIOLATE ORDER PROTEC //V� >r�D - 7405 S. York Avenue . -11732 06/11/04 20:50 ANIMAL COMPLAINTS/ /DOG IN MOTO 7429 S. York Avenue R VEHICLE YORKDALE TOWNHOMES L Y I -~ 7-. tv zvrov celd A. -71cJ5 } ~~ . -�--'- ` '\ \ | ^ � ite Run 07/20/2006 Edina Public safety ine Run 05.48:52 Combined Report - ordered By Incident Date, lency: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: ime..: Rd Year /Num.: 14e 1 4 24" so gee 4, ago; kseekieA�. +�� 7401 ir499 IfORK� icident Incident ) Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location 1 9-380 01/07/02 00:13 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS/ am sedan 7401 York Terrace dk 2 -2211 02104/02 09:03 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS strange 1 7429 S. York Avenue etter received from a police d YORKDALE TOWNHOMES apartment 2 -3557 02/22102 02:40 MISC OFFICER 7447 S. York Avenue 2- 7881 04/22/02 09:28 DISTURBANCE 7429 S. York Avenue �. YORKDALE TOWNHOMES 2 -8979 05/08/02 00:59 PARKING COMPLAINT / 3 CARS PAR 7405 York Terrace KED ON YORK TERRACE /RP WANT S THEM CHALKED FOR 6HR PARKING /FEELS IT IS A HAZARD 2.8981 05/08/02 01:50 PARKING COMPLAINT / dMoidO OM 7429 York Terrace 2.9834 05/19/02 10:11 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY /VEHICLE TI 7429 S. York Avenue RES YORKDALE TOWNHOMES 2.9836 05/19/02 10:16 D%AGE TO PROPERTY /VEHICLE TI 7429 S. York Avenue ` RES YORKDALE TOWNHOMES 2.9837 05/19/02 10:23 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY /VEHICLE TI 7429 S. York Avenue RES YORKDALE TOWNHOMES 2 -9895 05/20/02 09:41.911 FOLLOW -OPS 7429 S. York Avenue YORKDALE TOWNHDMES 2 -9896 05/20/02 09:44 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY tire slashi 7429 S. York Avenue ng YORKDALE TOWNHOMES 2 -10219 05/23/02 23:32 QISTURBANCE 7413 S. York Avenue 2 -11597 06/10/02 04:24 BURGLARY 7423 S. York Avenue 2 -12695 06/23/02 00:16 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC / RP CONC 7429 S. York Avenue ERRED OF KIDS HANGING IN LOT /N YORKDALE TOWNHOMES 0 CRIME BEING COMMITED JUST HA NGING OUT 2.14403 07/13/02 22:37 DOMESTIC 7413 S. York Avenue r, r" IL/\ \1 I W Inl. I a AA_ 1 1 _"Au ite k, 1/20/2006 Edina Public Safety ime Run 10:21:37 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Datt jenCy: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: ime._: Rd Year /Num.: ncident incident 3 Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location 3 -1200 01/18/03 21:06 UNWANTED GUEST // 7527 S. York Avenue 3 -2347 02/04/03 16:45 MEDICAL A� / 7523 S. York Avenue am am lwmr 3-4760 03/11/03 06:10 DOMESTIC /ASSAULT 7503 S. York Avenue 3.4804 03/11/03 18:19 MEDICAL A 110111M 7541 S. York Avenue 3 -6058 03/28/03 15:56 WELFARE CHECK / 7503 S. York Avenue 3 -6' 04/09/03 12:22 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 7541 S. York Avenue 3 -6856 04/10/03 17:42 7503 S. Turk Avenue 3 -8538 05/03103 10:43 GUN CALL- - 7537 S. York Avenue 3 -8591 21111= 111100111111116 05/03/03 23:58 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS / W/M RED 7501 S. York Avenue DISH WHT SHIRT WHY PANTS AROUN O BY GARAGE RP STATES PARTY IS PACING BACK AND FORTH 3 -9235 05/12/03 23:37 DOMESTIC ME 7509 S. York Avenue 3.9309 05/13/03 19:10 MISSING PERSON /1a/WAS AT YM 7523 S. York Avenue CA HAS HOTRETURNED HOME 3.9536 05/16/03 19:15 DISTURBANCE / 7503 S. York Avenue 3 -10353 05/28/03 06:03 THEFT FROM AUTO 7537 S. York Avenue 3-" 'S 06/18/03 22:18 MEDICAL 7537 S. York Avenue P Run 07/20/2006 Edina Public Safety Run 10:17:09 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Dati !icy: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: i ,e, -: Rd Year /Num.: :ident incident Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location •2433 02/05/03 14:42 HAZMAT - GAS /GAS LEAK COMING 3254 W. 76 Street FROM STOVE AREA ANNOW -2837 02/11/03 01:00 911 FOLLOW -UPS /HANG UP 3214 W. 76 Street -3939 02/27/03 18 :16 MISSING PERSON 3240 W. 76 Street solmlow -6235 03/31/03 19:23 911 FOLLOW -UPS 3240 W. 76 Street 1 -8526 05/03/03 02:25 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS / PULLING 3214 W. 76 Street ALUMINUM SIDE 1 -8544 05/03/03 12:03 MISSING PERSON 3240 W. 76 Street S -8560 05/03/03 15:08 MISSING PERSON / 3240 W. 76 Street I 3 -11176 06/07/03 01:44 SUsP VEHICLE /PERSONS AMMOL 3234 W. 76 Street r 3 -11679 06/13/03 18:57 MEDICAL - 3226 W. 76 Street r� 3 -11820 D6/15/03 23:18 UNWANTED GUEST 3234 W. 76 Street 3- 12264 06/20/03 23:58 MISSING PERSON 3230 W. 76 Street •I 3-13671. 07/05/03 23:29 PARTY CALL / 3234 W. 76 Street ' 3 -15113 07/23/03 10:45 911 FOLLOW-UPS 3240 W. 76 Street 3-15825 08/01/D3 00:11 HAZMAT - GAS 3204 W. 76 I Street i 0i wnu1 W-IR6•IA on- II -onw 4 Ru.. ./20/2006 Edina PubLic Safety Run 10:20:13 Combined Report - Ordered BY Incident D ency: ED Edina Public Safety service Coda: { ne-•: Rd Year /Num.: 1 .ident Incident i Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location -17454 08/20/03 09:18 FIRE ALARM COVERS /HEAT DETECTOR 7429 S. York Avenue YORKDALE TOWNHOMES s ' -17865 08/25/0307:53 WELFARE CHECKM 7425 S. York Avenue } I * .L . Y ;- 12114/03 14:30 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS 7429 S. York Avenue YORKDALE TOWNHOMES .—I I .u.n...In nn_ii-MAW r -18. 09/08/03 08:11 MEDICAL AI§Mft -7423 S. York Avenue 3 -19641 09/16/03 14:11 FOUND PROPERTY -.7423 S. York Avenue 3 -22563 10/26/03 02:07 GUN CALL ML '7429 York Terrace + ' KESSLER, THOMAS 3 -24046 11/15/03 15:47 AUTO THEFT / 7427 S. York Avenue 3 -24117 11/17/03 07:43 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 7427 S. York Avenue IMF CASE #03024046 3 -25908 12/12/03 12:45 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 0MON lME 7429 S. York Avenue L YORKDALE TOWNHOMES . Y ;- 12114/03 14:30 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS 7429 S. York Avenue YORKDALE TOWNHOMES .—I I .u.n...In nn_ii-MAW 7 i i :e Run 07/20/2006 Edina Public Safety �I re Run 10:20:10 Cortt�ined Report - Ordered By incident Date) may: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: Vie... Rd Year /Num.: :!dent incident Number Date - Time Incident Nature Incident Location •1875 01/29/03 08:39 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY - fflFWI 00 7453 S. York Avenue -4137 03/02/03 21:37 WELFARE CHECK 7427 S. York Avenue -6209 03/31/03 10:39 THEFT /FORGERY/ 7401 S. York Avenue I e 5 -6750 04/09/03 12:11 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC 7429 S. York avenue YORKDALE TOWNHOMES -7524 04/19/03 23:08 DISTURBANCE 7405 S. York Avenue IN THE AREA 0 F 7405 YORK. PEOPLE OUTSIDE FR OM A GATHERING, TOO LOUD 8291 04/30/03 08:42 FOUND PERSON 7429 S. York Avenue YORKDALE TOWNHOMES ; -8312 04/30/03 13:13 DISTURBANCE /LARGE GROUP JUVEN 7429 S. York Avenue ILE TORKDALE TOWNHOMES Now c �wI1�I As R E W °-10956 06/04/03 11:49 FOUND ANIMAL -DOG 7429 S. York Avenue YORKDALE TOWNHOMES 5 -11329 06/09/03 05:58 MEDICAL - � 7439 S. York Avenue III 5 to R� .//20/2006 Edina Public Safety � me Run 05:48:55 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Doti 1 envy: ED Edina Public Safety Me..,. cident Incident Number Date - Time Incident Nature service Code: Rd Year /Num.: ! -25811 12/16/02 06:14 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC /RP RECUE STING ASSISTANCE WITH SHUT TING OFF WATER 1j ! -26013 12/18/02 18:45 MEDICAL 1E0IMffiffiftDw . 1AlL� ?-26595 12/27/02 10:13 THEFT AVE MEET AT OFFICE Total Incidents listed _,38 Incident Location 7423 S. York Avenue J' 7453 S. York Avenue 7413 S. York Avenue a. Run 07/20/2006 Edina Public Safety s Run 06.09:28 Combined Report - ordered By incident Date -ty: ED Edina Public Safety Service Code: e..: Rd Year /Num.: ident incident Number Date - Time incident Nature incident Location 12422 06/20/02 00:27 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS AIM&MOM 7543 S. York Avenue r 13775 07/05/02 21:59 MISSING PERSON 7549 S. York Avenue -14491 07/15/02 05:28 MISSING PERSON 7521 S. York Avenue -14531 07115/02 16.04 FOUND . DWOZD14491 7521 S. York Avenue -15229 07/24/02 13:39 911 FOLLOW -UPS /HANG UP 7535 S. York Avenue ° -15367 07/26/02 10:48 ATTEMPT TO LOCATE 7503 S. York Avenue �r■D Mi�Blti• �MII*T ? -15928 08/02/02 17:42 PD ACCIDENT /SUBURBAN TAXI 7517 S. York Avenue ?- 16263 08/07/02 12:59 911 FOLLOW-UPS /HANG UP 7545 S. York Avenue 2-16315 08/08/02 00:53 SUSP VEHICLE /PERSONS / TOYOTA 7551 S. York Avenue • TERCEL GRN OCC 2X 2 -16529 08/10/02 23:42 DISTURBANCE /KtDS POUNDING ON F 7523 S. York Avenue RONT DOOR AND WINDOWS 2 -16973 08/16/02 12:51 91090 mm 7429 YORK - . NAIN OFFICE /YORKDALE 2 -16975 08/16/02 13:23 WELFARE CHECK 7503 S. York Avenue - 2 -17156 08/18/02 16:04 KID CALL / 7553 S. York Avenue 08/31/02 12:01 ANIMAL COMPLAINTS 7517 S. York Avenue 2 -18181 2 -19085 09/12/02 17:33 911 FOLLOW-UPS 7551 S. York Avenue 2 -20439 09/30/02 12:22 HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS / NU 7551 S. York Avenue LTiPLE PHONE CALLS 2 -21200 10/11/02 16:23 TERRORISTIC THREATS 7545 S. York Avenue 2-21205 10/11/02 17:00 TERRORISTIC THREATS 7545 S. York Avenue 7545 S. York Avenue GAYE, DEBORAH Run __,20/2006 Edina Public Safety i Run 06-58:09 Combined Report - Ordered By Incident Datel icy: ED Edina Public safety Service code: Rd Year /Num.: FanO ges V1-- 4299 !dent Incident 4umber Date - Time incident Nature Incident Location 14104 07/10/02 12:55 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC /MEMO* 3270 W. 76 Street 8� • 1� 14362 07/13/02 12:12 MEDICAL /90NM=MNN memo 3240•W. 76 Street 14367 07/13/02 12:48 FIRE ALL OTHER /POSS ELECAM 3250 W. 76 Street moo" DEXTER, DIANNA -16345 08/08/02 20:08 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY dMINOW 3260 W. 76 Street mw 10 ! -16476 08/10/02 06:53 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC /NO WATER 3246 W. 76 Street 2.17788 08126/02 10:07 THEFT /TIRE COVERS 3240.W. 76 Street 7429 YORK AVE (MANAG EMEN4 OFFICE) a Run 07/20/2006 Edina Public Safety 3 Run 06:58:06 Combined Report - Ordered By incident Oat ney: ED Edina Public Safety e... ident Incident Number Dote - Time Incident Nature 01102/02 10:17 911 FOLLOW -UPS I -2661 02/10/02 08.19 OPEN DOOR Service Code: Rd Year /Hum.: -2764 02/11/02 16:52 WELFARE CHECK /I ' S -2765 02/11/02 16:53 911 FOLLOW-UPS /HANG UP CALL ! -3199 02/17/02 11:01 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC / girMINS incident Location 32 76 street � Il i 3208 W. 76 Street 3254 W. 76 Street anionwo 3204 W. 76 Street 3204 W. 76 street WINIORMP :? -7242 04/13/02 17:41 MEDICAL 3226 W. 76 Street wA.l 1 W IA... IA AA_I I_nAw r' r 1- 4266 03/04/02 09:12 911 FOLLOW-UPS/ ON CALLEACK RP 3266 W. 76 Street REPORTED H&R PD ACCIDENT IN P ARKING LOT 2 -4986 03/14/02 00:32 DISTURBANCE 11011 3254 N. 76 Street � 2 -5034 UNION& 03/14102 12:35 MEDICAL / 3200 W. 76 Street so �■S+�wrAldre 2 -5984 03/27/02 09:29 MEDICAL MON. owdliww 3226 W. 76 Street WINIORMP :? -7242 04/13/02 17:41 MEDICAL 3226 W. 76 Street wA.l 1 W IA... IA AA_I I_nAw lJfial I LN r ?I �6c 1'eviSeg dale;0f, Tgesdoy:; August lh July 26, 2007 Dear Yorkdale Townhome Neighbors: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a development being proposed by United Properties and CommonBond Communities. On Tuesday, July 17th we held a meeting for the neighbors of the Yorkdale Townhomes. We were provided a mailing list from the City of Richfield and the City of Edina, and over 700 mailings went out. We met with two residents that lived immediately adjacent to the development. These neighbors stated that they had not received the mailing. The purpose of this letter is to make sure all of the neighbors immediately adjacent to the property are aware of the development being proposed. Enclosed is a copy of a letter we sent to everyone on the mailing list provided to us by the City of Edina and the City of Richfield. In an effort to make sure your questions are answered, we will be holding another smaller meeting at the Community Room at Yorkdale Townhomes on Tuesday, August 7th at 6:00pm. The directions to the Community Room are: Enter into the parking lot off of York Avenue and park at the south end of the parking lot. Follow the signs to the Community Room. Please feel free to join us. Sincerely, IJ44�- /I Brian P. Carey Senior Vice President Development Enclosures C: Elizabeth Flannery Cary Teague Patrick Smith BPC /bls 3500 American Blvd. W.. Minneapolis, MN 55431 • 952.831.1000 • fax 952.893.8206 • www.uproperties.com A IIry UN 1, TEO P R 0 P E R T I 5 July 11, 2007 Dear Edina /Richfield Residents: The purpose of this letter is to inform you about an exciting new development which is being proposed by CommonBond Communities and United Properties. The redevelopment will include approximately 10 acres of land located in Edina, at the northeast quadrant of York Avenue and 76`h Street. It is our intention to redevelop the existing Yorkdale Townhomes development on that site. Currently the site is home to 90 Section 8 housing units. The new development plan would redevelop the entire site which would include approximately 192 workforce housing units, along with approximately 112 senior housing units. All of the existing residents will have an opportunity to remain on site. The workforce housing will all be made available on a rental basis, while the senior housing will be owner - occupied. The senior housing will be an Applewood Pointe Senior Cooperative similar to those we have built in Bloomington, Roseville, Woodbury, Maple Grove, and New Brighton. In an effort to fully communicate our plans with the neighbors we have enclosed a site plan depicting the preliminary layout. Each of the three buildings located along York Avenue will be 4 -story structures, while the town homes on the eastern portion of the site will be 2 -story with a tuck -under garage. We are holding a meeting on July 17th at the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum Building located at 7499 France Avenue South in Edina. The meeting will start at 6:00pm with a brief presentation of our plans which will be followed by some time for some questions and answers. Both United Properties and CommonBond communities take great pride in the developments we create. We look forward to investing in this exciting redevelopment in your community. Sirteerely, an P. Carey Senior Vice President Development Enclosure BPC /bls 3500 American Blvd. W., Minneapolis, MN 55431 • 952.831.1000 • fax 952.893.8206 • www.uproperties.com 3 May 2007 ift. UNHID YORKDALE CAPACITY & PHASING STUDY .0 .119 PRO P f RIIIS Edina, Minnesota Jackie Hoogenakker From: Roger Harrold [Rogerharrold @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 4:46 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Design ideas for new YMCA I received the Public Hearing Notice in the mail today. I have recommendations to make regarding the design of restrooms in the apartment building based on my experience of being confined to a wheelchair for nine years and being unable to either walk or stand. If a person cannot stand, then the requirements are different in terms of locating the toilet seat. I live in York Plaza, 7200 York Avenue South, a condo, and I have revamped my bathroom in a way that best meets my requirements. I am willing to share my ideas with the city on how this needs to be built and show someone how I have built mine so that it works. I have yet to find a restroom in a restaurant or hotel room that works. So if you are building this apartment complex to accommodate anyone with wheelchair disabilities, contact me so I can show you how it needs to be built. Regards Roger Harrold, Ph.D. 7200 York Avenue South / #609 Edina, MN 55435 952 - 929 -7542 12/22/2008 December 29, 2008 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 ATTN: Planning Commission We are home owners at 7300 York Ave. South. We strongly oppose the plan as presented by the YMCA. Our major objection is to the volume of traffic. Currently, it is a hardship entering and exiting our complex whose drive -way is directly across From the YMCA. Any additional traffic would make left turns'almost impossible. Please give this matter serious consideration. DONNA SUMMERFIELO RUBY SCHIEFEL EI Jackie Hoogenakker From: Thomas Kessler [thomas_kessier @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 3:33 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: Invitation for YMCA meeting I some follow -up from Public Hearing Mr. Teague, Hope you are having a pleasant holiday season. We received the additional arch docs from Mr. Dorgan, however fail to see how these "revised elevations" address more critical issues with the proposed project plan as raised in public hearing in October by the many neighbors, citizens and planning board Commissioners and members. The general consensus upon reading the notes from the hearing seem to be that there is too much building being proposed, no desire for more housing with an unexplained plan of how that housing will be used and a history of poor management of the existing units that has lead to a dangerous area and concern for public safety. There are even specific variance proposals that even a citizen and Commissioner Risser, Brown and others call out as an issue for concern. There are setback variances on all sides of the lot and many Commissioners even recommend a reduction of apartment units. Overall this layout destroys the adjacent park that covers that whole back area in the cul -de -sac and neighboring skate park and fire station where numerous children play and replaces it with a parking structure. Some questions: . In addition why are there not drawings that depict the surrounding neighborhood, bird's eye and relational views from the streets? The buildings are set so far forward to the street that it doesn't blend into existing properties and original layout for the area. . Are there other supporting planning maps that are activity based for this area? Parks and residents in zone quadrants perhaps? Has a feasibility study done on the projected traffic increase to support this proposed project? I can see bottlenecks during peak times of the day along Xerxes /York Avenue and this adding to the already busy corridor, especially now that the Westin is up. What about the special transportation needs of the MS residents too? . It's hard to see the value that this project brings to the city of Edina and the neighborhood and tearing down a structure and rebuilding one of almost identical size and at double the cost to renovate the existing? Wouldn't it be cost effective to renovate both the existing Commonbond and YMCA sites with that capital since they are non - profit? Confusion with the Housing Mix (article): City Of Edina Planning Dept. 4801 " -st 50th Street ina, Mn.55424 Dear Sirs: I live at Edina Place, 7300 York Ave. South. In your planning of a New YMCA and four story Unit, is there any plans for road improvement? Traffic from York Avenue Traffic from the YMCA Traffic from Edina Place Traffic from Fire Station Check this out from each exit add entrances. MOre traffic from YMCA and the Housing Development? It That is my concern. 6, B. Marmas 7300 York Ave. S. #203 Edina, Mn. 55435 1-2 ti a `0 z Testimony of Susan Stellmacher Individual Living with Multiple Sclerosis Edina Planning Commission Meeting on December 30, 2008 Introduction Thank you Chairman Lonsbury for your leadership, and distinguished Members of the Edina Planning Commission. I'm happy to be here this evening to speak on behalf of all the people who live with multiple sclerosis or MS and who struggle to find affordable, accessible housing. My name is Susan Stellmacher. I live in North Minneapolis at Kingsley Commons, a CommonBond Community exclusively for people with MS (or a similar demyelinating neurological disease). While I am an Activist for MS, I am not a lobbyist. I'm simply a 54 -year old woman who was struggling to pay market rate rent in Maple Grove when I was no longer able to work due to worsening MS. First, let me tell you a little about what MS is and what MS does. Then, I'll share my personal story. MS is a chronic, unpredictable, often - disabling disease of the central nervous system. (optic nerve, brain, spinal cord) Very simply, MS interrupts the flow of information between the brain and the body. It basically stops people from moving in one way or another. At this time, there is no cure. MS can cause blurred vision, loss of balance, slowed gait and poor coordination. It can cause slurred speech, tremors, spasticity, numbness and tingling and extreme fatigue. It also can cause cognitive problems (memory and concentration), bowel and bladder dysfunction, paralysis, and complete blindness. These problems can be permanent, or the symptoms can come and go as it varies from person to person. Most people are diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 50. Although individuals as young as 2 and as old as 75 have developed it. MS is not considered a fatal disease. The majority of people with MS live a near - normal life span. So for many people like me, it is a prime of life disease. For many it's a struggle to live productive lives as the disease progresses. Two - thirds of people who have MS remain able to walk, though many will need an aid, such as a cane, crutches, or a walker. Some will use a scooter or wheelchair because of disabling fatigue, weakness, balance problems, or to assist with conserving energy. More than 400,000 Americans have MS, and every hour someone is newly diagnosed. World -wide, MS affects about 2.5 million people. My Story I was diagnosed with Relapsing Remitting MS in the spring of 1989. My journey into permanent disability began in the fall of 2006. No longer being able to work at a local blood bank, it became necessary for me to start looking for affordable housing. At that time, all of the apartments that would rent according to my qualifications were Senior/Disabled. I was faced with a 6 month to 2 -year waiting list time. Then, there was the realization that I would be a 52 -year -old living amongst an average age group of 80 to 85 year olds in senior housing. It was an extremely frustrating time for me. My future looked bleak. Fortunately for me, the National MS Society - Minnesota Chapter and CommonBond Communities came to the rescue. I am forever grateful to the MS Society and CommonBond for making Kingsley Commons a reality for those of us who struggle with this disease. I am happy and proud to say that I live in a beautiful, 2 bedroom (brand new in 5/07) apartment that is 100% accessible (Universal Design). Before moving into Kingsley Commons, I lived in Maple Grove. Early one morning, I fell in the bathroom. l didn't realize that my legs and feet were completely numb. It took me from 3am until 6:30 am to get to my phone to call for help. I spent the next 8 weeks in a boot cast as a result of that fall and injuring my right ankle. When I moved into Kingsley Commons in June of 2007, I could finally sleep peacefully knowing that I was safe. The building is secure; there is a 24 -7 health care staff on duty. I have the option to sit in my scooter to wash dishes or stand at the kitchen sink. I can safely reach into my cupboards as many of the cabinets have pull out drawers. Another feature that is extremely important to me; the bathroom -- it 's equipped with grab bars and a pull down, built in shower seat. The commode is raised to accommodate those of us who have toileting challenges. The struggle to keep myself safe at home is finally over. Despite the daily challenges that MS presents, I am living a truly meaningful, independent life while moving forward with MS: Solution As you have heard from my experience, there is a shortage of affordable, accessible housing. But hopefully you can help with a solution. I am a person with a chronic, life - changing disease. Until I moved into Kingsley Commons, there was little hope in sight. Thank you again for your time and attention. As you consider the Southdale YMCA Housing Project, I hope you remember me. If you can, please help all the people like me that need affordable, accessible housing. Thank You. Jackie Hoogenakker From: dwaine lindberg [dlindberg76 @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 3:18 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: YMCA Project To: Edina Planning Commission Re: Case File 2008.0012.08 Rebuilding YMCA I live at 7200 York Ave. South across the street and a little north of the YMCA. I fully support the building of a new "Y" as well as the proposed housing units. Edina can well use more affordable housing. The one thing I would ask is the plan provide for a bicycle entrance either from the existing bike /pedestrian path or from Xerxes Avenue and of course bike parking in the ramp. Dwaine Lindberg 7200 York Ave. S. 221 Edina, MN 55435 1 Menlhars: Log in i Not Registered? Register for free extra services. st rr. M, Al O S:]EK-iCZRX E TOCAYi ' MINN FAPOLII TST. PIUIL USINESS JOURNAL Choose Another City: Mpls. /St. Paul Site I News I Coinpagos I JaUS Keywords Go. Scacch Arcr.,e HC'dE NEV113 IN D;l51'R I LS cvEWTS ('10%WUNITY COMPANt E5 3 E S OU RC ES L,SI'S R LEADS CAREERS TRAVEL Contact the newsroom Contact advertisino staff People on the Move Subscribe - 4 Free Issues EXCLUSIVE REPORTS T9Ghnolo9y n'innc Luls.a &l, Paul , Ront.Eddy!n > !ndwines , Cown)VIOJI.RCal Estate Friday, September 19, 200fi YMCA plans to rebuild Edina site Moincnt,clis 1 St Paul Busin055 JOUrnJI - I?y ,aLlLD 6L3ck Staff Wnlcr Print E-3 Rnpnnls RSS FCeJS Add to Del_iM.lu Digg Thi> comments The YMCA and its partners have worked on this project for several years, originally The YMCA of M... e. opolitan Minneapolis Rolatod News -.tr_ .......... _ is proposing a $20 million redevelopment of vkiP_93_ooaprofit vie ror'NQrtbern the Southdale YMCA in Edina, the most / t1 LI9111s, name on expensive project in the history of the P,Oicd6 Minneapolis-based association. _ P n,. m ov-,r W ...... Sherburne 4ot!gty. - Y could partbcr.roc.Elk Iu late August, YMCA officials submitted plans V e., rge.r Rlvpr_toc4hy to tear down the existing 70,000- square -foot vA w_see YMCA at 7355 York Ave. S. and build a modern 73,000- square -foot dvyetgper_fo.LZa4tock.l grQUnps building and an attached two -level parking deck. St. John'; Hosnira1 acaps.S6aM..e =passion The plan also includes a four -story, 130-unit apartment building and ptT ^- underground parking garage that would be developed by St. Paul - YNICA- workingour based CommonBond Communities, one of the largest nonprofit health cats partnership affordable - housing developers in the state. The development will require a zoning change by the city, which YMCA officials predict will generate close scrutiny from city officials, particularly over the housing component. ancello Bydlon, vice president of development for the YMCA, said the facility has gest annual budget of all YMCA's in the state — about $to million — so it can't be shut down for a year while there's a major redevelopment. The YMCA plans to build the new center in the parking lot of the existing building so it can keep the old center open during constriction. The apartments would be built after the old building is demolished. Ideally, the YMCA would like to secure city approvals this winter, break ground in the spring and have the project complete 18 months after that. .SVb.SGrbe IC!..MInlrGapeilS- '..SI,.PaVI. t:VS!.ne45.J5lun:al Oracle vs SAP Click Here for Gartncr's Independent Analysis of Midsize Solution Stratayies Search for Jobs oy-T ,,n, Search yicw,Iwlgcilfas.JOtas.:.?l� t.]UUS.tptlay Business Rosources stanina a Bus ne$5 The new company will Succocd Dcnvel-baSCd Ensol,at Adv :u Inc., m1 �n�CStnunt aovisor; Oml with SF,p ­H in assets under m,mogumen:. Sate, $.. &Marketing Sponsored by H4.overS'J Ruccssloo aided deal to, Owings Mllls firm. Buslne" tla I& oy Catch:rlg the multi- elhnic •ram± has prgvc i to he a growth :_Irategy for accounting lion. The YMCA's 50- member board of directors support the project. Some members who live in Edina are getting personally involved, meeting with neighborhood groups, members of the city council and the mayor. "We're praying that they approve the zoning change so that we can go from a single -use to a mixed -use situation," Lincello Bydlon said. "That's the big, big hurdle that %ve have to cross %Kith the council. People are worried about building more of what they're perceiving as low- iuconlc housing," she said. But this project wouldn't add low - income or Section 8 housing. The units would be offered to three groups of renters: market -rate, people with Multiple Sclerosis and nwderate- income workers such as teachers, police officers and YMCA employees who have difficulty affording a home in Edina, (ancello Bydlon said. (In the 2000 U.S. Census, Edina's median household income was $66,000.) MCA has been tweaking its expansion strategy in the Twin Cities in recent years. It's p,,, tiered with churches, health care institutions and cities to develop new facilities, especially in the outer -ring suburbs. The combination of a YMCA and housing, although new to Tvviu Cities YMCA -e, is done in other parts of the country. It's a throwback to the NrMCA's 164- year -old roots of providing housing for workers. The housing Cumponeut is a service for the conmumity and it will help offset the redevelopment costs, she said. Oracle VS SAP C ick Herr- for G,iilnei' 1 I11L�81;8r1 C7 C: "t i hnaIyz,;S r; Midsize Solution Strategies Email Alorts �usinaS[. n, _vs delivcre.l ;o vr,w nber. Sign rip 7utlyy_'I F.catpred_VIpls,/SI,,Paul Jobs powered by cn,Targq!:005 • Fi. rill IIY ,Pfr74ri':b-:nroi.,ll.,�lll: (;:.;r,•. Rlt��.. i; i,:n Sc:`.i -e, and Rec- ttro,, t • Fam:ly_P!.ar:,:.e, - r;nru:;l ! +r:alth .,,nu 'i'hye ".i;ln Sen;,r:.>> u:,d F'.cemament • F.rin:ly_Prar;;lre- Auruin ll;;::ltn � „1,;.?n;,:.,.;_n 5 ^: ^nr�. a�in RCGIUIn It:!'1 • LwilJi Pig�vr.e - aria Renu.Uncn1 Soor0_J9Us I Fost.Resume I yiewjlore PUsI.g.JA4. I Feature_. Jq.b a. a. 12012- OM9 T9Ghnolo9y Kraus - Anderson Cos. of Minneapolis is slated to he the general contractor and BWBR Ahcroatr,e enemy Architects Inc. of St. Paul is overseeing the design. b "'rip' 'o, om- tt iu ,e „hu. 1e t S .,Jo , swfe..r. The YMCA and its partners have worked on this project for several years, originally planning an extensive renovation of the existing building, Lancello Bydlou said. HR trni9 DUIU;hU rolls out '111asb The cost to renovate was about $8 million, but it "was only about double" that to start over camer rlistnmizatr,n.' with a new building, she said. "The thought of renovating what we had was just not real appealing to people." The YMCA's 50- member board of directors support the project. Some members who live in Edina are getting personally involved, meeting with neighborhood groups, members of the city council and the mayor. "We're praying that they approve the zoning change so that we can go from a single -use to a mixed -use situation," Lincello Bydlon said. "That's the big, big hurdle that %ve have to cross %Kith the council. People are worried about building more of what they're perceiving as low- iuconlc housing," she said. But this project wouldn't add low - income or Section 8 housing. The units would be offered to three groups of renters: market -rate, people with Multiple Sclerosis and nwderate- income workers such as teachers, police officers and YMCA employees who have difficulty affording a home in Edina, (ancello Bydlon said. (In the 2000 U.S. Census, Edina's median household income was $66,000.) MCA has been tweaking its expansion strategy in the Twin Cities in recent years. It's p,,, tiered with churches, health care institutions and cities to develop new facilities, especially in the outer -ring suburbs. The combination of a YMCA and housing, although new to Tvviu Cities YMCA -e, is done in other parts of the country. It's a throwback to the NrMCA's 164- year -old roots of providing housing for workers. The housing Cumponeut is a service for the conmumity and it will help offset the redevelopment costs, she said. Oracle VS SAP C ick Herr- for G,iilnei' 1 I11L�81;8r1 C7 C: "t i hnaIyz,;S r; Midsize Solution Strategies Email Alorts �usinaS[. n, _vs delivcre.l ;o vr,w nber. Sign rip 7utlyy_'I F.catpred_VIpls,/SI,,Paul Jobs powered by cn,Targq!:005 • Fi. rill IIY ,Pfr74ri':b-:nroi.,ll.,�lll: (;:.;r,•. Rlt��.. i; i,:n Sc:`.i -e, and Rec- ttro,, t • Fam:ly_P!.ar:,:.e, - r;nru:;l ! +r:alth .,,nu 'i'hye ".i;ln Sen;,r:.>> u:,d F'.cemament • F.rin:ly_Prar;;lre- Auruin ll;;::ltn � „1,;.?n;,:.,.;_n 5 ^: ^nr�. a�in RCGIUIn It:!'1 • LwilJi Pig�vr.e - aria Renu.Uncn1 Soor0_J9Us I Fost.Resume I yiewjlore PUsI.g.JA4. I Feature_. Jq.b a. a. 12012- OM9 Plan already down -titxed FEATURED RESOURCE Originally, the YMCA had floated an eight - story "beautiful tower" for the apartments, Pp.-La Job 8 Receivq a FREE Premium Salary RcpQt L.ancello Bvdlon said, but it decided to scale back the project after meeting with members Post ajob online with bizjournals.com and get a PayScale Of the city's planning staff and community. Salary Report - FREE (a $99 value)! Report contains: • Salary L Henri Rates • Bonus L Be -fils Cary Teague, Edina's planning director, said the design is a positive for the city because it ■ Sxil15. Expenence a Educnuon creates it building with presence along York Avenue instead of the sea of parking that's there now. Etch ..he[v.,p +..rr;::e3n!]n�s.clfGr On the other hand, Teague said, the YMCA's request to rezone the project adds some uncertainty to the plan's fate. "It may be it difficult process to get this one through," Teague said. The city's first meeting on this plan is sehethlled for Oct. 1 with a public hearing held by Edina's planning commission. Pnnl Emau Y:rhuo! Buz. READER COMMENTS (0) Comments Twin Cities Real Estate powerby.-Ii; d ip+e! Fea(urgd.Prpperty ■q',,, Rain, $W.0C -S14 CO 1' 3wldin ;l Size. 35 iki0 SF U;e Type Lease ' dole..T•.n:in,CS�esBstl.GSC,h: ._.. Pages: t _ Continue Readnlg, Mpls.ISt. Paul Business Directory Minnesota Articles You must be logged in to add a comment. Please Login or Register. More News Headlines Popular News Stories Related Industry News ■ Q,$ ,.t;ritl.ally ?,G Rll1( I 1, 7 r.G ir._(rhi4q 1p. IS,- Anon cl ■ F3g •n,sj_R. S VJh�!i>Lr_ctrevise (BCStonl ■ �VtJ s I�;ZS_InJJ�nvu�r Off �prgpeniES IDum, ^7 • GaS.pC.C..S. �I,; ?, l..Sa:!.]lS C. A:.Balrxrt.!_P..eRO.SXIyLnl11 IP...urr0 • C:y__nam, 15Ir_rn$pprtallUn dl_!:or ;Chalk ;ucj Business Pulse Survey oelny_diai t[ -Py7. Iri Get the right products Search Press Releases VP. 2 :L hln0 -: llf!1i51,.5t $?purl."- s-0LesS Vr.;,y_ P lJ,_Prr ;S:i.R!- : -' ",5q r Contact the Edhor Need Assistance? Multi Latest Ndws Latest News ■ TILQr44rn up. -n.S..!tew I?tl?!Bi0g de�n5'y ■ GQ!I!]lr.Yarl!!5 „$ $ uite5 .R14h5_i193i92t!.SX..QLSU,n ■ C?!].)pCy_al9.OI5Qf1 Gt:!. Ifri !l.G9ptra.5't9r.5.tA..!:.lu” ■ Qlt4! I, Ttill ]_hir�tiY6!r1li.ILnnt9..P +!.S? s..61.4..�?91:. ^CX • P..V.I.triti ur `•Gllti_t2 #1ffi: I gnCS..:Cf IN _rrlGt!] /!,yG:'. G2L16Vpt. CITY GUIDE SPOTLIGHT - MPLSJST. PAUL ARIJCUnns n, t.1pi.... 5!. Pdul i��i,:.:::kl5d.ln,61{d:..rut. PAUI Hute's In PApls.fit PJVI Zt'yl(rll::no %;•,r t:'I:I:::il P:fyl Search by Company, Organization, or Keyword GOl Cont— Provided by PR Newswire. e o i I 'r nn, m.rs ilr n1 011r IJV:! P-nc. Prrr:v. p.)nne `.w,th 1`00MI ;.; ONLINE: HonIC I f)wS I: +S N(^a "S I PJrlt EA,tion I Ad,0015C 14JarFf`IPIpCe Bl D!tCSj Rc`SOIIrGCS I Colnnlyr Ily I About ,lla I SCaryltI R$$ Fr,•FQS I $,to `AQ I CQPWCL1.R4 I CPI. p 8 } }?rpfi ;ei PRINT EDITION: VU Frtur:, 10,Rmit. EI .I u ! I AVVCrbss I BWk_pf..LM1ts l l)e "a oad,E- dl!,ell I P/I�CIy.I eL`npt5_Ri9hI.S I :Top .25. 001.1 Pl.rQIM l,Si! le_lSSeCS BIZJOURNALS: U Z ulr0a15 I 0 _S <a V4rp I Jolla I h;;v ;ernV !_ro'❑ GrcV ..I Mpl;;_ „SI. Pau! 9,n i0ra DnrctoPy I ML,15,1.St, .au!.Eaa n > Tray -el AFFILIATE PUBLICATIONS: ,pr +!Iful,S. SUGrI SI,',riyn,,•ya.,lw�l;rrl ;,l, $HUrIiE ;V4!r!! +S. U;)rly, ).t;1SS._Nigle; f,c;�i. © 2009 ;- :;111An._,'1y 3.,stne.,S Joarr ok, Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved, The material on this site may not be reproduced. distributed. transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior wrinen permission or bizjournals. I 0RAC• I (: January 20, 2009 =. a 2B a Members of the City Council, Many other neighbors and I stand defiant against the project being proposed for the tear down of the existing YMCA and expanding the footprint of further development of Commonbond units and residents on this site. We ask that you vehemently deny approval and reject the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Overall Development Plan for this proposed project as it fails to meet many of the goals as presented in the October 1" Edina Planning Commission meeting. I also recently contacted the developer and didn't hear any of the concerns addressed except to change the grade on the site, nor did we hear from Commonbond or the YMCA. Many residents and even members of the Planning Commissioner challenged the proposed project shortcomings and problems during that meeting. Please see a copy of the letter that I prepared and was presented to the Commissioners at that meeting. In addition there is a copy of the Edina Police Report that factually documents the crime statistics for this area and incompetence of Commonbond in managing the Yorkdale Townhomes complex. and many of my neighbors will attest to the chaos and catastrophe over the years of being neighbors of Commonbond and their Yorkdale Townhome residents. Their unwillingness to act in helping to correct a horrible crime rate and the massive amount of irritation and offenses against its neighbors is appalling. It has been all talk and no action from one Vice President after another with the organization over the years. They still have made no effort to correct outstanding issues or build a relationship with the surrounding homeowners that I outline in my previous letter. Whenever anyone calls to ask for their help we get put in the box and treated as if we are tenants. There were many points that were finally brought to the surface with Commonbond management representative Ms. Flannery in the hearing however inaccurate. Inaccurate Statements from Commonbond Many concerns were raised in the hearing on October 1" and to my dismay after reading the notes from that hearing Ms. Flannery when asked reported inaccurate statements and mistruths on key questions asked by Chair Lonsbury that I'd like to clarify as they are critical as how crime and managing residents is really perceived with Commonbond management: Question Chair Lonsbunr asked Ms Flannery if the townhomes and have on -site security an she responded in the affirmative. Fact: On site security is not in employ nor have we ever seen security guards on site at the townhouses. We ask that Commonbond present proof of a security service contract other than the Edina Police. Question: Chair Lonsbury asked Ms Flannel referred to a letter from a neighbor who owns_ property near Yorkdale Townhomes that included Edina Police reports from incidents occurring_ at Yorkdale Townhomes including the mention of a shooting and drug deals Continuing Chair_ Lonsbury asked if there is a property manager on site at the Yorkdale Townhomes. Fact: I had numerous conversations with the only on -site property manager Linda Sperry who informed me of her one day commitment every Thursday. On that day she would meet also with Officer Nibbe of the Edina Police Department. I kept in almost weekly contact with her and the Fulltime Maintenance person whose name is Roy. Ilk January 20, 2009 The largest issue that Commonbond seems to not address is who is residing in their residences. Many occasions numerous people not on the lease occupy the townhouse property and without a property manager or special designate to enforce this, all kinds of people and elements enter the units and breed crime. I witnessed years of drug dealing and use in front of my house. They just don't want to step up and manage the residents effectively and assign a fulltime person to engage them and have looked to Roy the maintenance man to pick up the gap. That's not what call the best alternative in helping these people. Richfield Residents: was unable to attend the October 1 S' meeting and have kept apprised of the hearing and been a voice that is consistent with many of my neighbors even though I am temporarily away from my home in Minnesota. I have also reached out to contact many of our fellow Richfield residents who I believe have not received invitations to these hearings. You should have received a paper copy of that letter that I sent out just recently as well. Planner Teague commented in the meeting on October 1st that "Edina does not have the names and addresses of Richfield Residents at our disposal" Here is a two block listing that I built from the Hennepin County Property Tax Records: Number Street Owner. city 7401 York Terrace Jerome Leffler Edina N55435 7405 York Terrace Jonathan Meyer Edina 7409 York Terrace James Washburn Edina 7413 York Terrace Gerald Wilmes Edina 55435 7425 York Terrace Fred Zellin er Edina 55435 7429 York Terrace Thomas Kessler Edina 55435 7433 York Terrace Michael Emmons Edina 55435 7315 Xerxes Ave S Gehard Kettner Richfield 55423 7321 Xerxes Ave S Evelyn Go lin Richfield 55423 7400 Xerxes Ave S Timothy Urberg Richfield 55423 7404 Xerxes Ave , S Stephen Nelson Richfield 55423 7405 Xerxes Ave S Daniel Adkins Richfield 55423 7408 Xerxes Ave S Janet Pearson Richfield 55423 7409 Xerxes Ave S Lolita Koolmo Richfield 55423 7412 Xerxes Ave S Elizabeth Herr oft Richfield 55423 7415 Xerxes Ave S Jeffrey Schmidt Richfield 55423 7427 Xerxes Ave Daniel Adkins Richfield 55423 January 20, 2009 Staff Presentation on October list Forward looking statements presented by planner Teague in the Staff Presentation hold inaccuracies from the realities of this proposed project. From the meeting notes on October 1st I'd like to challenge these with more factual evidence as argument against these points with real homework in these statements made in the presentation: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. S Xerxes Ave 7430 S Daniel Adkins Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7433 S Margaret Chisholm Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7434 S James Russell Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7438 S Kelly McHugh Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7439 S Ernest Johnson Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7445 S Daniel Wat'e Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7504 S Glenn Lau Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7508 S Charles Thompson Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7509 S David Ber sten Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7512 S Diane Hurley Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7515 S Harvey Erickson Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7516 S Michael Jacobs Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7520 S Jeffrey Dye Richfield 55423 Xerxes Ave 7523 S Cindy Kosen Richfield 55423 Timothy and Robert 3020 74th St W Beadle Richfield 55423 3014 74th St W Richard Lood Richfield 55423 3008 74th St W Holly Mahnke Richfield 55423 3000 74th St W Arvin Anderson Richfield 55423 3019 74th St W Mary Melberg Richfield 55423 3013 74th St W William Nelson Richfield 55423 3001 1 74th St W Nancy Bostrom Richfield 55423 Staff Presentation on October list Forward looking statements presented by planner Teague in the Staff Presentation hold inaccuracies from the realities of this proposed project. From the meeting notes on October 1st I'd like to challenge these with more factual evidence as argument against these points with real homework in these statements made in the presentation: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. ft January 20, 2009 The YMCA property borders primarily single family resident homes and a Richfield Park that is utilized by those residents. The majority of adjacent land is Single Family Homes. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west The multiple family housing developments to the west are privately owned Senior Housing across York Avenue and a deep boulevard that divides both lanes, looking south only the half of the YMCA parking lot borders the existing Commonbond Yorkdale Townhomes and the remaining is Single Family Homes to the north, south and east. 3. The guide plan would be consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. There is overwhelming evidence including crime statistics that this is not in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare as it's been a high crime area for over a decade. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi- Public. The YMCA is the primary benefactor of this and have stated so publically that they are competing with a for - profit rival L.A. Fitness that recently opened up four blocks away. Hence the primary intent of this site is Quasi Public and not Mixed Use. See the article from the Business Journal and comments from YMCA Director Greg Hanks. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. That's 21 years away and following through with other unsaturated areas in Edina would obviously be best for the community and a more effective use of funds and sites for resident recipients of Commonbond. There is plenty of timeline to meet the 2030 goal. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Again this is forward looking and there is no evidence from a Traffic Feasibly Study that has been done by the City. A massive amount of new residents and special transportation for MS residents would definitely cause congestion. Following this there is condition number 6 that raised concern and needs qualification; which includes the removal of 8 parallel parking spaces on Xerxes Avenue. We believe those Richfield residents may have a say in this as it's in front of their houses and this is a bordering street of both communities where people park their cars and enter the park through the path in that cul- de -sac behind the YMCA. Closing What is really overwhelming with this proposal is the massive amount of building and overcrowding that will overtake the neighborhood property above ground, below ground and overhead. No one has presented impact on any area other than the proposed site. While more I January 20, 2009 examination supports the negative impact it will have on the area directly surrounding including the park adjacent. Yet this is more evidence that this challenges the zoning change request. The proposed project seethes into the surrounding neighborhood that incurs variances on all lines but fails to demonstrate hardship for any need here, other than to build a massive structure on a small site. This was raised by a concern of a resident, Commissioners; Risser, Brown and an enduring dialog with all Commissioners in the hearing previous. Tearing down the existing YMCA may be of viability, punching the site out with a second structure twice the size in square footage of the recreation facility is detrimental to the area and larger than the physical land will comfortably allow. It also increases the risk for this new facilities success. Please also take careful consideration and hold Commonbond accountable for their actions moving forward as not just a non- profit developer but a landlord with a poor history of property management. Ask to have independent researchers conduct surveys and interviews of their neighbors for a voice of the community. Put them on a performance improvement plan to meet the standards that the planning commission would like to see for the future of Edina and lead by example. With many friends and family in and around Edina and Richfield area, I've spoke with many of them and some business partners in the Country Club area that support a renewal of the YMCA, however few have embraced the amended Commonbond low or moderate income housing component of the plan. We are a select group of homeowners with the intent of making a difference in bordering Edina neighborhood and improving it for an investment in its future. Ask that Commonbond do the same with their properties and be good friends and neighbors with us. We want the Yorkdale Townhome residents to be good neighbors but they need leadership to show them the way. I have confidence that the City Council will make the best decision for what's good for the area and the City. Best Regards, Tom Kessler Property Owner of 7429 York Terrace, Edina MN 55435 Cc: Property Owners To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director KhFUK I1KECUNINIhN 1)A'l lUN Agenda Item II.C. Consent Planning Commission Recommended Action: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan Amendment and setback variances. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously recommended approval of the setback variances for both lots. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes. Staff has appealed the Boards decision to allow the City Council to take action on the entire proposal. Information/Background: See attached Planning Commission staff report, minutes and development plans. Information Only Date: January 20, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: A Final Development Plan Amendment and drive aisle Action ® Motion setback Variance at 4010 65th Street West and 6400 France. ® Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Planning Commission Recommended Action: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan Amendment and setback variances. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously recommended approval of the setback variances for both lots. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes. Staff has appealed the Boards decision to allow the City Council to take action on the entire proposal. Information/Background: See attached Planning Commission staff report, minutes and development plans. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-15 APPROVING AN AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR TWINCITY ORTHOPEDICS AND SOUTHDALE FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group on behalf of Twin Cities Orthopedics and Southdale Fairview Hospital is requesting an amended Final Development Plan review with driveway setback variances from 10 feet to 0 feet at 4010 65th Street West and 6400 France. 1.02 The following are the changes that are proposed to their approved Final Development Plan: 1. Enlargement of the drive entrance on the east side of the building to allow easier and safer turning area into the building. The proposed drive -aisle would encroach onto the property to the east, and therefore, requires a variance to the side property line. The adjacent property owner ( Southdale Fairview Hospital) has agreed to the encroachment, and is a co- applicant for the same variance on their property. 2. Revised landscaping along the north lot line. Trees would be planted in the MnDot right -of -way to avoid underground utility lines. 3. Revised storm water storage system. 4. Increase in the parking ramp stair tower height by 2'2" to accommodate structural clearances. 5. Revised building material from architectural precast to brick on the fourth level. 1.03 On December 30, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Amended Final Development Plan and Variances. 1.04 On January 8, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the variances. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan and Variance. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952- 927 -150b FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-15 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 With the exception of the variances, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2.02 The amendments do not add any finished square footage to the previously approved plans. 2.03 The proposed changes to the plans are minimal. 2.04 The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the size of the approved . building on the site, the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The site's high water table prevented the parking from being. constructed under ground. 3. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 4. The revised driveway would provide a safe and easy turning radius for delivery trucks driving into the loading area. 5: The intent of the ordinance is to provide separation and green space between lots and uses. This site is unique in that it is part of the Regional Medical District, and there would be a pedestrian connection between the parking ramp for the hospital, and the new building. The appearance would be that these uses function together. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Amended Final Development Plan and Variances at 4010 650-1 Street West and 6400 France Approval is subject to the following Conditions: r RESOLUTION NO. 2009-15 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the previously approved final development plan unless modified below, the plans listed below and the conditions below: Site plan date stamped November 26, 2008. Grading plan date stamped November 26, 2008. Landscaping plan date stamped November 26, 2008. Building elevations date stamped November 26, 2008. 2. The following must be submitted to the city before the city issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the county. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. An executed cross access easement must be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new building. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on January 20, 2009.. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -15 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2009. City Clerk Minute Summary: Planning Commission Meeting December 30, 2008 Members Present: Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Grabiel, Forrest, Schnettler, Lonsbury Members Absent: Brown 2008.0007.08b Amend Final Development Plan Mohagen Hansen/Twin Cities Orthopedics 401065 1h St West/6400 France Avenue Presentation by Planner Planner Teague informed the Commission Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group, on behalf of Twin Cities Orthopedic§ and Southdale Fairview Hospital is requesting an amended Final Development Plan and driveway setback variances with the following changes: 1. Enlarge the drive entrance on the east side of the building to allow easier and safer turning area into the building. The proposed drive -aisle would encroach onto the property to the east, and therefore, requires a variance to the side property line. The adjacent property owner ( Southdale Fairview Hospital) has agreed to the encroachment, and is a co- applicant for the same variance on their property. 2. Revised landscaping along the north lot line. Trees would be planted in the MnDot right -of -way to avoid,underground utility lines. 3. Revised storm water storage,system. 4. Increase" in the parking ramp stair tower height by 27' to accommodate structural clearances. 5. Revised building material from architectural precast to brick on the fourth level. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the amended Final Development Plan at 4010 65th Street West based on the following findings: 1. The amendments do not add any finished square footage to the previously approved plans. 2. The proposed changes to the plans are minimal. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the previously approved final development plan unless modified below, the plans listed below and the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Landscaping plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped November 26, 2008. 2. The following must be submitted to the city before the city issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the county. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. An executed cross access easement must be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new building. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City engineer in his memo dated December 19, 2008. Concluding, Planner Teague stated staff also recommends that the Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council approve drive -aisle side -yard setback variances from 10 feet to 0 feet at 4010 65th Street West and 6400 France based on the following findings: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the size of the approved building on the site, the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The site's high water table prevented the parking from being constructed under ground. 3. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 4. The revised driveway would provide a safe and easy turning radius for delivery trucks driving into the loading area. 5. The intent of the ordinance is to provide separation and green space between lots and uses. This site is unique in that it is part of the Regional Medical District, and there would-be a pedestrian connection between the parking ramp for the hospital, and the new building. The appearance would be that these uses function together. Appearing for the applicant Mark Hansen, Mohagen, Hansen Architects 2 Applicant presentation Mr. Hansen highlighted the changes that have been made to the plans, adding that in his opinion the changes to the driveway /entrance actually enhance the project. Mr. Hansen pointed out the widening of the entrance drive provides a safer entrance and turning radius. Continuing, Mr. Hansen pointed out that planting the trees on MnDot property thereby avoiding utility lines is also positive for the site. Concluding, Mr. Hansen asked the Commission for their support for the revisions to the Final Development Plan. Commission Action Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend revised Final Development Plan approval including variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 3 DRAFT MINUTE SUMMARY ZONING BOARD MEETING.1 -8 -2009 MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Schroeder, Scott Davidson, Bernadette Hornig, Nancy Scherer and Mary Vasaly B -08 -67 Mohagen /Hansen/Twin Cities Orthopedics 4010 65th St West/6400 France Avenue Request: Driveway Variance Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Board Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group, on behalf of Twin Cities Orthopedics and Southdale Fairview Hospital is requesting driveway setback variances to build a driveway over the side lot line that separates these two properties. The specific request is a variance from 10 feet to 0 feet for both properties. Planner Teague explained the purpose of the,request is to enlarge the drive entrance on the east side of the building to allow easier and. safer turning area into the building. The adjacent property owner, Southdale Fairview Hospital, has agreed to the encroachment, and is a co- applicant for the same variance on their property. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends approval of the drive -aisle side - yard setback variances from 10 feet to 0 feet at 4010 65th Street West and 6400 France based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the size of the approved building on the site, the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2.. The site's high water table prevented the parking from being constructed under ground. 3. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 4. The revised, driveway would provide a safe and easy turning radius for delivery trucks driving into the loading area. 5. The intent of the ordinance is to provide separation and green space between lots and uses. This site is unique in that it is part of the Regional Medical District, and there would be a pedestrian connection between the parking ramp for the hospital, and the new building. The appearance would be that these uses function together. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1) City Council approval of the Final Site Plan for the site. 2) The variance will expire one year from the date of approval, unless an approved a time extension has been granted from the City Council or Zoning Board of Appeals. Appearing for the Applicant Mark Hansen, Mohagen Hansen Applicant Presentation Mr. Hansen told the Board in his opinion this reworking of the driveway entrance is best, because it moves traffic off of West 65th Street much better and it's a better turn - around. Board Action Member Hornig moved variance approval of B -08-67 based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions noting the size of the lot relative to the building. Member Davidson seconded the motion. Ayes, Hornig, Davidson, Scherer, Schroeder. Abstain; Vasaly. Motion carried. yo+e�2, �U) �y Originator Cary Teague Director of Planning PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting Date Agenda # December 30, 2008 2008- 007.08b INFORMATIONIBACKGROUND Project Description and Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group, on behalf ) Final Orthopedics Plan Southdale Fairview Hospital is requesting an amended and driveway setback variances. The following are the changes that are proposed to their approved Final Development Plan: allow 1. Enlarge the drive entrance on the east side of drive- would easier and safer turning area into the building. P roposed encroach onto the property to the east, and therefore, requires a variance to the side property line. (See page A10.) The adjacent property owner ( Southdale Fairview Hospital) has agreed to the encroachment, and is a co- applicant for the same variance on their property. 2. Revised landscaping along the north loi utility renes. (See page A15.) the MnDot right -of -way to avoid underground 3. Revised storm water storage system. 4. Increase in the parking ramp stair tower height by 2'2" to accommodate structural clearances. 5. Revised building material from architectural precast to brick on the forth level. The properties are located at 4010 65th Street own the existing bug d ngnand build a applicant has received approval to to th four story medical office building and parking ramp at laps on pages A1S reef West. (See project location, applicant narrative P Northerly: Crosstown Highway (62) Easterly: The parking ramp for the Southdale Fairview Hospital; zoned APD, Automobile Parking District, and guided for office use. Southerly: Cornelia Place Apartments; zoned PRD -4, Planned Residential District, and guided high- density residential. Westerly: An office building; zoned and guided for office uses. Existing Site Features The subject properties are 2.02 acres and 2.85 acres in size. They contain an existing office building, a 60 -foot tall cellular tower with antennas, and a parking ramp. The office building and cell tower will be removed, and the antennas placed on the roof of the new building. Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Grading /Drainage /Utilities Regional Medical POD -1, Planned Office District The city engineer has reviewed the revised plans and found them to be acceptable. (See page A20.) Changes are subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Landscaping As a condition of the original approval, a row of coniferous trees were to be planted along the north lot line. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the landscape plan that would shift the coniferous trees to the north into the right -of -way for Highway 62. The purpose of the request is to bury the overhead electrical, cable, telephone and fiber optic lines along the north side of the building, where the trees would have been planted. MnDot has agreed to allow the planting of the trees just inside of the right -of -way line. These trees would be shifted 8 -10 feet from their original location. (See page A15.) Building Material The applicant is also requesting a slight amendment to their approved building materials. As a cost saving measure, they are proposing to use brick on the exterior of the fourth floor of the medical office, rather than an architectural precast. (See proposed elevation and materials on pages A4— 2 A5.) Per Section 850.18.Subd. 4, these materials would be an acceptable replacement. Building Height The applicant is also requesting a slight amendment to their approved building height. The approved height of the stairwell was 87 feet. The applicant is proposing a 2'2" increase. This would not impact the variances, as the stairwell portion of the building meets the required setback. Green Space /Landscaping Adjacent to the Driveway The expanded driveway would require five be a loss trees to removed. (See square feet of page Al 5a.) In addition, there w green space. Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make'the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The new Comprehensive Plan designates the site for regional medical use. The medical office is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains e complied the lied with by the Final Development the extent the conditions can P Plan; The proposed plans he consistent approv o Preliminary Development Plan. T proposed changes are m C) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The revisions are slight, and would not be detrimental to surrounding property. d) will not result in an overly-intensive lan use; and e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The revisions would not change the use on the site, therefore would not result in undue traffic congestion. The widening ef the drive entrance would make it easier for delivery trucks to get into the 3 - 1 conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and 1 This project received variances for the building. The changes would not impact the approved variances. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues ® Are the Final Development Plan amendments reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the amendments to the Final Development Plan are reasonable for the following four reasons: 1. The building materials that are being changed out are acceptable materials in the zoning, ordinance. 2. The height of the stairwell is only 2'2" and would have a minimal impact on the overall structure. The height of the office building and parking ramp would not change. 3. The landscaping along the north lot line would generally remain the same. The only change is the shift of the Pine trees into MnDot right -of -way. The benefit is that utilities would get buried underground rather than being exposed above ground. 4. The storm water storage system is acceptable to the city engineer, and would be subject to watershed district approval. ® Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F., of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests: _ - - -- - -- - 1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? 4 Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the request is reasonable. At the time of the original final development plan approval, variances were granted, including building and drive -aisle setback variances. The hardship for those variances was the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. Also, the high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. The variances met the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the RMD district, the height of the ramp and building are generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the,area. Those same conditions exist with this proposal. An additional difficulty is the location of the approved building and parking ramp, which provides very little room for adequate or comfortable turning radius for trucks making deliveries to the site. The building and ramp needed to be larger as they could not be underground due to the high water table. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. Again, at the time of the original approval, there were several variances granted for setbacks with this project. The findings at that time were that the subject site is unique given its close proximity and easy access to Crosstown Highway 62. Also, the circumstances of the shape and limited depth on the west side are unique to this property and generally not common to similarly zoned property. Those circumstances allowed a large building to be constructed on the site. The building's location adjacent to the east lot line did not provide an area that would allow a large area for turning radius into the site for delivery trucks. The intent of the ordinance is to provide separation and green space between lots and uses. This site is unique in that it is part of the Regional Medical District, and there would be a pedestrian connection between the parking ramp for the hospital, and the new building. The appearance of the area would be that these two sites function together. _ 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 5 No. The driveway over the lot line would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Amended Final Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the amended Final Development Plan at 4010 65th Street West. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The amendments do not add any finished square footage to the previously approved plans. 2. . The proposed changes to the plans are minimal. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1: The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the previously approved final development plan unless modified below, the plans listed below and the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped November 26, 2008. . • Grading plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Landscaping plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped November 26, 2008. 2. The following must be submitted to the city before the city issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the county. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. An executed cross access easement must be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new building. 6 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City engineer in his memo dated - December 19- 2008 -- Variances Recommend that the Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council approve drive -aisle side -yard setback variances from 10 feet to 0 feet at 4010 65th Street West and 6400 France: Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the size of the approved building on the site, the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The site's high water table prevented the parking from being constructed under ground. 3. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 4. The revised driveway would provide a safe and easy turning radius for delivery trucks driving into the loading area. 5. The intent of the ordinance is to provide separation and green space between lots and uses. This site is unique in that it is part of the Regional Medical District, and there would be a pedestrian connection between the parking ramp for the hospital, and the new building. The appearance would be that these uses function together. Deadline for a city decision: March 17, 2009 7 City of Edina 4227 1224 6200 6305 631 6309 6700 F 4223 4221 63" 6313 6301 6307 6709 4219 4218 6. QQQ §� 6313 6313 >� j632 6311 4215 4214 6717 6716 a 63fe 4211 4110 6776 6723 6370 8122 4202 4206 6720 6329 6326 6326 4200 6370 6735 6331 FRANC! AVe 3 TO H19 N66Y62 GOIN7TY rtO6O e1 �IYIAH HC+ AY ei IRSNMYd2 bB hW gp `7 IryQ7A✓BS 42014 4010 0 8100 4 Y t 7033 i D 4005 6500 sY P t C 6705 S 6�5 6704 6JW \` // 8]Od 6717 �s �d t0 11" as 0 6363 6101 a971+srw ^6.62�5' 24 6605 6609r1 6613 6766620 6617 ':,.W.ersam J9m -+' PID:3002824140004 f? p le e 4010 65th St W �, s�- Edina, MN 55435 v Legond House Number Labels Street Name Label, / City Limits / .. Creeks ElLake Names Lakes Perks El Parcels 42f4 631? ` 6316 6321 6316. 4 1210 6716 - 4 ut2,�' 6325_ E122 _ C (ZOE`r 6720 f a C 6329 6326y -•J29 ,� f 6326 F r pa Y TV- 4200 f 6335 Ess f ` SERV7 RD J• FI A VE $ 10 Ki4WAY 91— T r Y p? + ! lt ao;t r . � � � �, 1I�M1►+IR�r�f�rr � r�x�+ +i � G fr�. la; J � L r rZosland Fark '- `mss. S 1 0 ,a 4 9, � i 1 Mohagen 2 Hansen Qraep 0 >diiYi a�� w I f rim 7■ Crosstown Medical Office Building Edllll-l. Mirlr, - final Development Application - � K ax o o w cQ t14 I Accent Brick n 0 M �_ CL P n' �o n r� i z 0 3 Cr N M rr S N O O 00 Primary Brick Primary Precast Accent Precast,. - 0 extured & Smooth) - Accent Metal (Canopy) Accent Metal (Roof Edge) Louver ... (Parking Garage) Window Frames Glass :s 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Tel 952.426.7400 Suite 200 Fax 952.426.7440 Wayzata MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com AOLICOT VA RMT 1 VE Mohagen Hansen ArChItedural up Group Crosstown Medical Office Building November 26, 2008 Design Narrative Final Development Application - Amendment Introduction: On behalf of Hegenes Management, Inc., Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., and Edina Crosstown Medical, LLC, we are submitting this Final Development Application to the City of Edina, Planning Department for consideration of amendments to the plans. The Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group Design Team and the Crosstown Leadership Team of the Medical, LLC, have worked with engineering consultants and the General Contractor to refine the design as needed to address technical feasibility issues, access and safety concerns, and cost - related issues. The Design Team has attempted to maintain the design integrity and appearance that was established with the August 19 approved package while solving problems that have arisen due to external forces as well as unforeseen detail and cost escalation. The team believes the solutions presented maintain the original intentions as were presented to the Planning Commission and Council earlier this year. ��`■ ... Amendments to the Approved Project: The following is a summary of those items that have been changed on the project since the 8 -19 -08 City Council approval and that were of specific interest to the commission and council during the review and approval process. It has been determined that these items are significant enough to warrant a follow up approval process with the commission and the council. 1. East yard and service drive - improved access and safety 2. Landscaping on north edge of site - planting in DOT right -of -way to avoid buried utilities 3. Storm water storage system - alternate approach to irrigation storage and infiltration 4. Parking ramp stair tower height - minor height increase to accommodate structural clearances 5. Revised veneer material from architectural precast to brick on fourth floor - cost savings measure East Yard Revisions: Twin Cities Orthopedics and the LLC have entered into an agreement for a land lease with Fairview Southdale Hospital to secure the use of the yard between the Crosstown Medical Building and the Fairview Parking Ramp to develop a wider service drive and access to the medical office building. This redesign allows space for staging delivery vehicles and maneuvering of vehicles with minimal impact on West 65th. This improved design has been factored into the current pricing assessment for the project. North Edge Landscaping: Due to the desire to bury the overhead electrical, cable, telephone and fiber optic lines on the north side of the site, a 15' wide utility easement has been developed along the north edge of the property. The installation requirements and maintenance requirements for this easement limits our ability to plant trees in the easement. At the same time, we are attempting to satisfy the city's requirement to provide additional trees along the north side of the property. To satisfy all parties, we have sought and been granted the right to plant all of the trees slated for the north edge of the site in the-MnDOT- right =of- way. —T-he- original - planters -an d- shrubs-that- wer"r- oposed -on- the- norffi�side-o£the buildingw ll be installed and are not considered an, obstruction to the installation or service of the utility lines. N Mohagen /Hansen Architectural Group 4 1 ® Design Narrative Final Development Application - Amendment November 26, 2008 Page 2 of 2 Storm Water Storage System: In evaluating the cost of the storm water storage system, it became. apparent that all of the components required to make the system work from a technical and code standpoint resulted in an outrageous cost for limited benefits. 'Rather than store and treat all of the top level rain water for the ramp, we are proposing to provide storage and treatment via in- ground vaults for a volume of water needed for typical seasonal irrigation purposes. The remainder of the water from the first 1" of rainfall will be routed to in- ground infiltration chambers, thereby meeting the requirements of the watershed district for on -site management. The design team has developed a solution that will still provide the sustainable or LEED value while saving the owner significant costs. Parking Ramp Stair Tower Height: . During our design and detailing efforts since the August council approval, we came across some structural clearance and sloping issues on the west end of the parking ramp. While our goal has been to minimize the height of the parking ramp and stair tower elements on that end of the building, we ultimately had to address the clearance and sloping issues by making levels on the west end of the building slightly taller. As a result, we have raised the west wall by V -2 ", approximately, and have raised the stair tower by 2' -2 ". The additional height on the west wall allows us to maintain proper vehicle clearances under structure and piping while the increased stair tower height accommodates those same clearances as well as allowing us to maintain proper vertical height or scale of the stair tower elements (glass and cap). Revised Veneer Material on Fourth Floor: As a result of the Design Development pricing effort the Design Team was charged with looking for ways to reduce costs on the project while maintaining the appearance of the building. Significant cost savings could be found by reducing the amount of architectural precast cladding on the building and changing it to brick. One area where the team believed this could be done was on the fourth floor of the building. As a result we have replaced the light color architectural precast with a light colored brick that will match and complement the overall design. Making this change to the exterior has allowed us to maintain the original level of quality and detail on the rest of the building. Summary: It is the goal of the ownership group and this Design Team to address all city concerns and requirements in the execution of this project. City concerns about our commitment to building what we have proposed certainly still apply and it is for that reason that we have been asked by city staff to resubmit our final development and variance applications, indicating all changes that impact those items addressed under the zoning regulations and of specific interest to the commission and council. We believe that these amendments are in keeping with the original intent of the previously approved project and will ultimately serve both the city and the owner will a better final product. We ask for your careful consideration and timely approval of these amendments and are more than happy to discuss any of these items with city staff or representatives of the commission and council prior to the December and January meetings of each. k: \ jobs \ crosstown_wdical \ crosstown_medical_shell_07430 \ 001_admin \ code \ 07430_ memo _rezoning_narrative_amendl.docx A7 N Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group Mohagen 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Tel 952.426.7400 Hansen Fax 952.426.7440 Architectural Suite 200 Group Wayzata MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com Crosstown Medical Office Building December 16, 2008 Variance Questions Extending the Service Drive over the Property Line 1. Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? As is the case with the site in general, the proportions and dimensions vide the proper The m plans that have been developed and approved for the building and site attempt to prot will meet the square footage or footprint owner with a building footprint and the associated parking required to make the project viable as well as provide the required i le lane drive meet a for the service entry As a result, the space left on the east edge of the site provides g that will only allow delivery vehicles to back in off of West 65th Street, owo service area. require vehicles to back out onto West 65th Street in cases when the driver pulls in front -first to However, with the Fairview land lease, the expanded service area across the east property line will provide the required turning clearance off of 65th Street, which will allow box trucks to pull in front -first and then eet. This ht site maneuver around to back up to the service door and pull out and servisce entry in 65th vsectio by egliminating modification will improve the overall safety of the 65 Street awkward truck service traffic, which interrupts the flow of 65th Street traffic. 2. Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? the stret, Again, with this property, the overall proportions of the site are compromised lion is challengedfand the e pinching the west end of the site to a point that a normal parking building rea is, therefore, pushed to the east side of the site the b�tOngeand the necessary agefithe east end e g proposed medical office use. in order to adequately develop e service entry of the site is minim».ed; therefore, limiting the size of th area. But more importantly, the unusually high water table associated with the site eliminated the need for the extensive above -grade parking underground parking scheme, which would have owed the building dification. pushed to the west providing a larger off g arages.. Furthermore, it would have all street turnaround service entry similar to the propose m 3. Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? The development of the wider service aisle has been designed o° e� between from new and existing trees. office and the existing 5 -level parking ramp which In fact, the originally proposed drive aisle access off of 65th Street has been altered with the expansion of >m a o e exis g the turnaround on the east section o e site; ere ore, creating turnaround area o n the ith the eu ofelimination of service vehicl backing area. into -or neighborhood due to the heavily landscaped addition, due to its positive impact on 65 Street w of 65th Street, the alternate expanded service drive creates a safety benefit to the existing neighborhood. K:\ JOBS\ Cross totwi_ Medical \CroSSt07vn_Medical_Shell_07430 \001 Admin\ Code \07430_yaria11 ce_Questions.d0cs Y� p 8 _3 d Site Development Summary Psrkbg Summary an .00ira .ro um naur .[sr woa� P.rrr- na nuur arc .ui. v.m s Mm .ms) Ka Preaa m nru. � ossrat B®oP.2 versos (urp � °ao¢b� /m �su� 6 ,nr srr,. • wroosm nrms.a n.sr s (.zaq. � �, ' 1 wnlBn Ea¢r nbor aw / sm . sn A7. 0 MrBn.b - w auu arnnm 06aE IOIrIE: RIN® 6T¢ p6rbR (Pm -II WTOY➢ lnWM: aCBn.K r�C4 bS,BCI (1°O) SnB.a a[y1r6.6rllt BrIIaY P.faaE j rrvr u a ann xr. so' aua xv Io' aoc ar a alnE xr. ra rwaoan ua mrr. on¢ wlaa sns: rases m }aP bAmE Sro.a 1 �_, —_— IOR eNXME Yro.0 I I 4 -S PARKIN mmnlm .raa v.aB.c � ao a.I X11 raB Y , I u r;,o Z I b TJ I�Ib Q I m I �VN General Site Notes 1. a.aavaao osBrouBW ra na PsoaR rsrolem Br ornaao vrmmarq swxm s wuriors ra ntv.rias o amr..a raroor.wrr ro urur� .s sxorr w ras eur .ac rsromua wrra.cra Buu rrm vwv m[ mranB.s .rr uraln IBE+nbrs voa m uuv.nar >nr. s .rr bs novncs ua raven. Irc oim� sawn a romm a.miw>aoe.� t .Ii o.r,aon ua m r.¢ v bran a urea r.¢ or evunra cans Bnmrasr xorm. .. im[n m uroauv+u wun ra p.Ci WSna.E Balp9as .rm IM.,Y)Ci V fart a.ws. um raub, 000n s .IL wen a.a .IS 9r.I1 s Bo rm (ro r.a a a.o) urns once ro>m. a r,_ m .ro armr a Prv.n aivun Buu s eeio rants Blrmrr4 roan. r,_ grim am Brrrrw a wrx moan awls at ara eras ona.e4 wren. s. nrr mnn.Bla ar.0 Bc atsoB.Bat ra wB.mc .ro r.rrrrre u.nc moan arm error rs e.rec.m au►rc sna osrnw.i sn.t n..Emis rB Inns ro CbrRO< 1rE In.EIEMT O la.rrt r®[ IQ�Wr. Rlmrpl 6 n24 BSVm Sr.LL B[ wwam err ra orr ..o Dram reoa ro vumBrr. ra.rrc mrlan ores sr.0 throw ro .rvrvw.a rent naorms t sonorous v.vomlr uB [arose s¢mrs ro et r .¢am.rr¢ arnr nc aomom.mrs v nc aonorrx Brain. t mrnucra B,rL r.r,.r rut •E� m .pa¢n rrarpll[5 arwo ma,rrcm. tar ra¢ .0 v.ct.urne; r«r ro .vin nvan ou..¢ ro wrm.r rwB.a>w In ro oar r)am r rent over o ur neon ro .lV)BBa v rent hoar. ® Sign t� as neaten v x.rarae .asm[ Ir s rr err -r v o NIOC rY i IY as-se Site legmd t �, I NALLY �rIP� OR S[rr.a un POO xBY4 M I[Y6 0 QTrrrC rri mxoarr e.so[ ooxo¢r sor (� snnaxnn e. , .noroan rw¢/ �� r.Ii © rues o P sru e B�cuwmc rOr@ e6[ T Bnlmm /PBS, a 775M 3 JUN I / I I I % I I 1 � I obi I w X mia.Ii �I�Mr afr anbo rman ur rm rrar rror® saaou ro ra NOT FOR CONSTIf UCP[OI '1 I l u' g2 coo' W Y I . 2 Q D] I a� of 1 _ Lasvr j i i• d_ gr 9 c `4e M dLNU 9xwR .r P®T .few l mp�r�elt m EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC O ®m 1000MMI IIn Y111 ®W ¢IEt• m NM V< L InG1¢N NN ¢PInLnN ww®u¢ nrN.nfl auLL m'Oir f¢ �0°¢ "1O unm 1n0�°°N m mar.ml�m¢wxlm. s xn o®lv�xm nr raao. M mx®1 omm .mr. N� a EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING a .LL Nmxu¢ .x m v.x x Qo a moral v� v faxm mm lolm 4010 65th STREET W a ram m vl.a+ [a.er umo alml�¢ .uN lanlio¢ aces .lf nelx mm s ma EDINA. MN a u. aPe r.o ws wu s m v¢r (m vr¢ v aW N,m ooav a a. am fm ¢mm a Pw.¢ Pwvmx way�. ®x los® mlorr 0o of arm a tin m¢ux fau r . um ollnrs a. 1. M tslrlEN1 fell r �O ®a N Im1Oi0I10 Wo1f.w10 xrm fm .+ enrm won m omen afo. n.omo m.fi1C fNl[ lt�]eR. N.mO�f S MN OLY WIII� ®BWL E (pIGNt M Wa>d� 6 •lram K M tm .le NOmI l�r m 0..Om1 ¢.NC C91rNL mew m wrmv,¢ ufoi nxw� a slNflfN wwmrt .lf mlar¢ mae m r x �.xx rm M �IIW 6 M ®¢¢Mdl fin] ®• �v MML ieenr nLL.oss] m.W.mrt 10u¢s ¢on 'ae a ml ¢c .0 wcrm¢o � m .Im vemx a.f.x m .nfNf. In o v uaaNn w � Non a ar Psu m .101m1�¢l a wnr Sao usm mNe.m .nla t. (urq . wio® rmm"m n� � Nnr essnm maim ovum mix f]INCI �Mp �p ®xia lmul ofsr 0 1 NINa aafoala vm P mr a a Non xr. � m �atw or. le vraP® l� lmva mix SEW— eorN ® ra�N ® w ELM. Paeldn8 S»9 nlupm w.w! wf®v.m aN coil+' s n.ua '� .VNrvr 1 � f-7 rxia nfm .r.. .mW°. .lmoo & Um w¢® im�oimmv® n ®sauo�..wlmm wooarl� corms ® Sip L ."O" u elw f¢I n' r ]r a: x.lrrr .®c nr a lr u w PrnN m s lr n -I OrlM1f4R .SN oca au a ®m r om � .Dore o ® ss ^' ww S(tG La and flD®17 ttd� lm of asp ""w �.�.� mK•lPa mf of rrnno rn mr6¢ H LSJd mCnc NIIYgIr P. rsNm v � as IaIN. nwc m Pmo P¢L v srau port .e x SrrE PLAN s m .r ae CfTY SUBMITTAL NOT F CON3MUCTION C3 r- - - - - -- --- z (n II tI; 6 `` Notm l—zg- A MW-im0 . 43 EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LUC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MN w E m NLtmpvl H- jr UTILITY PLAN cl NOT C011MICION F- - we �mwM�naMm.nueW4 43 EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LUC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MN w E m NLtmpvl H- jr UTILITY PLAN cl NOT C011MICION F- - MI LYYL LI:L IYI is :�rt y.t w '�j-%i pis a` #�F i�z'i711f!�� Y�•w�wi iwJiLiYpiArGU�YlInMRM}N�l!�� r��1�I1 i�Gilliii�iiiilliii ■iii�il �ttEttttttt NMI..r�EL L 1.1 LI.I LLI wcY YM Y IM, ttrtttticrtrlirr LL L,L C��B�R�krE t�ttt�rrcrrY�,�„ l lNLl L I.LL Y xtt�d:�tt4kt�k It H BUILDING SECTION • SOUTH BAY, LOOKING NORTH WEI N- o_ _ iiil� Mu RZAN milmlilimialm i i ........ ............ lil Rol 1 ---------- i i i -------- T ------------ --------- -------------- --------- ------------ BUBDING SECTION - NORTH RAY. LOOKING NORTH i I I (�Dwn SECTION (g) B mm,- sEcnoN If crt EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65711 STREET W. EDINA, MN BUILDING SECTIONS F. ESIGN DEVELOP I (t) A4.01 T� BUILDING SECTION • SOUTH BAY, LOOKING NORTH WEI N- o_ _ iiil� Mu RZAN milmlilimialm i i ........ ............ lil Rol 1 ---------- i i i -------- T ------------ --------- -------------- --------- ------------ BUBDING SECTION - NORTH RAY. LOOKING NORTH i I I (�Dwn SECTION (g) B mm,- sEcnoN If crt EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65711 STREET W. EDINA, MN BUILDING SECTIONS F. ESIGN DEVELOP I (t) A4.01 ♦ /, C . v `ae emw ev ' - vIO•i wri - Yra•m P: P %i�uoHCre•em IY m - . - Pima om 1 .,. " °n° mraviv» Oret alaeT ---- _ —_��� �����sr.�r. r. r. r•r. Y..r•r. r. r. Y. _fir. r. 9 • aYYalmmr E v.owa ervumw mn i IeY[aYwa - � 7 -- meer loser rml ram - t. s — — — — — — — � _ P W \j 11� Q ll. ' � 1 •Iwt i 'mmYlns 1 �3 B c Gmdtna Notes rxo ru..H m m EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN munaY m seva o mslm mmlam• Yo anew u axs s t muM�aao¢imwaew M nmm s lwuim eom�am r la "C 1O0° MEDICAL BUILDING a Tuna °'mmw i.° Tm ura�Ow DMP,P,= iYD mve°rs 401085th STREET W. vacr YYSao unm mnueH lerwrian Yn oler urw YY v m.vin EDINA. MN 1 Nl m' Warl •HL i Y I�Y4Q Y1111 M GHmIT O.11a O j�p�pea�j Cmaa�wl s �w �i �1H.➢OI' RarMlm R ma® IerwE• NYwS alY m elmK RY YOB V IorY1 M w � iXMl E wfOm WR . HYMY f1Y0 6 HISe O HT.e®. � WI Rew1YJ el• aO iTNAe®IT. ' i ®ae$ RY • n¢ oHrzanm axY1 H ewe Im l�oia um arrt�i Y0eaYauov. raowo oia memo. pY�y 19pT 6 lelffC eIHY XF>ffilwr. AImF1iF11 H TI[H iM ®BWL maT mYYleo""ec m Ramesr. re.mc a•am arm sou oowrzY mrfl � � 9Y .,,.aw.rz a �Yi..�H wP1�urOTY.Y¢ e�H'YQY m YY6�GLV Bb Ai e[leml YYI PH.1! IeY merzY HaEL ,. o,.a� .mm°�wvasn'Onarzrm�m ,u � s:ra Ya � 6 e ®f evYR WI Nmlr noo® YY IYC •e.E • IYr�'i. mm a sHmlYU eveYO r.0 my aHYm Yvl� ue n.® . um® m wrew la wur.xT awm�iY. it �Praoaivar ®Yman eEl am Wmslla mrzY mn. H G WLIm M Ill Y0001mIT rl' o mm. orwwm ra rE wHOa a emar wTrc i IoHerYae nw�mmu°noiO ®Ha®®aa1FO�i.mion �m emre� M� S1'adoo Camnd Novo _ H i eraY wm w. HT cola ru H emxlm YYeY •rz w .0 �YY.0 YY IaYmO '' •elor wr IuE a erR. wea m Iwr mwra Imwme;aaa a eav ooaememi mlerH aY E ealuum wr mmYKeH eavY a :Tars sea om aalreol M moons sou neY mrva oeevrz wlulem nu Hume YY w ®v os RY¢r .Hw ne uH ® � emlm°imi nu�eeH memerm nlmm� rzoYmrslmo sl� � ♦♦ . :mlrae< sou memiH .Y suss um rlmYSr � C emrvet v rK aw er >K aem. na amYlnon aemeaslrr enosurzr v emHV m wrzwr eeacs molar v Hv ns ar�Yl wr aerr elimr m asneanare Imem ee am ®m m �T¢r romr Yo .R+ mmow v HT i am a o i oe+m rYYSr a r easow snYl eem i �n aru i emen a,m um es wm ®,w• wu H olu.�msoe ®H Mv1iv0°1 K 1 avrzaerH auu emus msaYn Bear wmrmol H Ieam Y. �\ N°i9°"� Y� " oral e.s wrz Han Yrrcm sr ws mnrrzc�l°1i � °O1p _ 6 Y�L W!- 1 ®m�eH�/4`v�Y,R mm EDOIY�rzK�� Y�nal �m av YM ®NO RY m iYClelGm. aL ®r.O aM BJR O YI H aeGIDl pilEalaY eml em H e•m euraT O �� � a l0)111Q6 Ie10a ®a0a Y laa • Reef eawrz 11>m Rr 1rrIY 9W1 i I®r {raE H eH Yp ®6 tEGMO Y aY r wma •44L H aaYRElm •aar. •HL H aYT[m NY YOC Rmer HWL E ameem wY m HIIDtl W tb R a eS .11Y am r aem s imo s ooa a�0°cws .moo ®�YOms ®G noarlr u¢ ow Ym Hr RYH —e.� elsl ar>a - � Raem m lrzY YwYI �.- esraer R �awr wa rE ® e0i GaeYIH Di �awar oirarw t� momcr • • Y-n d deY OO eeR x GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL NOT FO I t CONMUCPION li i �. '. . �iQir� ggt g8g B c _______ __ is.m..___ -_ a..exe.. GoPHm wyvp.rW W w •r r r u W a a l• Tm flw W ' =° r m.mtly ° � W 'rte W mane m •}. � r m/me m N6r5lV7E MSM ' ■r m.00em B•' more m ;•.w � .w �'��.mrr aaana 01• •' amee amwn p ------ resouae -ramnr - -- - -- - - -- --- ® "_ - -- S p .l - -�----_. - ?�2 -A-e-R-€- ---�- -------- ------- - - - - - - - - - -- - -= -- -- - -.- - - -- - -- - -- -- ° - - ------ c °a ---- - - - - --------- - - - - -�- -- -- Cxdi mnrc m n U TN D ALE - -579-4 SOUARE FEET --- --- : - -; - -- �� . t ' I Is FIDE ��-- .•� ° ,, ra GFfla eULDmG pARP(---t I , •i COT 2 1 �• -.,• -_ . _ � �_• I '�� !I Q - - - - -- - -- - -- BLOCK c e' - SEC N D n e•r � ADD '. awRr � u ' i. -- lO:r�'�IQ•'• � - - LILr34M1L.O �r�T er �i - j LEGEND O -- ® ® mm m -- am,.or R srwiwm .. tlr..r ® oasm -�- ro.or �.r rlr ■ .vY ® tlrxYV wr mur 6 0. ® r ■ tlw. �M m.tlrs mrr ■ n p va m .onv m w.rn -..�- tl.r tl Q mrs. a.•r � ._ .� O X — o m w ec I ar' RewoA �e wd'y' r , . EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MN w Mohnoon H.M. amw immr� .rr.e �arormr® err wim® �v ®um �uroe•sa ro ® txm 4m r q Otal.v.® a �i�®4rY rG Ylr I®O YS .OIL. rlrr ®.00I L' m Y 7 vow r. SITE DEMOLITION C1 T 13- 11 v V, I- 42'—B* . . . . . . . . . . . . ... s SCREEN WALL ELEVATION MINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 40M 65TH STREET w EDINA, MN m MH- 5 w I ENLARCM SrrE PLAN EAST YARD DESIGN DEVELOP A1.11 MR BID SITE RAN V, I- 42'—B* . . . . . . . . . . . . ... s SCREEN WALL ELEVATION MINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 40M 65TH STREET w EDINA, MN m MH- 5 w I ENLARCM SrrE PLAN EAST YARD DESIGN DEVELOP A1.11 — — — — — — -T.r_ — T — — —.— — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — --- — — — — — q — ------ - - - - -- 07 T —`�!_I MINNESOTA - T-A BANK OFFICE STRUCTURE a BUILD NC I �, ..• re- Y 1 rib I r �ry X i J1� i s 6sT H �y S T R E E T WEST SM DATA ZONM OASWCAM 1a nn.vc su um u aau.a,me.vaxn.a..®tmam� nm a = m PAROX UQU ID"M �u va i.t W sa MA G1LUA am s �mrrm - ®avmm naa r. im 6.4 �a GdA a.. v .v ®way. ary ..uoeom na.v .w aom am. atom oa.v .ate waaaaAt rr.a ®..s vu .m vAVa. a- m „maa,m.m..®aamaa ti v�aa. a m umn .r+Vm oiaaa omac aAa v�oa. v. m m ..m nrMa rAam vo am .a. vlwm v- a. < IA r Via, -I I I I i I� u I' FAIRVIEW pyJTHDAIf HOSPT ARKING RAMP SECFlON O PLANTER WALL 2' RH Af0 Sao CORNELIA PLACE APARTMENTS EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65TH STREET W. EDINA. MN 1 3 H- a� REGIONAL WE PLAN DESIGN DEVELOP ( A1.0 I >.Y ass rt - <T- yam" „yy. +'e- _ '` — �."r *. ._� ` •.�_.a"...� ��4��'� _ _ - ....•.,�'� -� '� � '+'M+ - r . i`;* aft . ��*'_ s � ,s �, � 's�' - " ,`.. _r _ �� A. o e 0 .J � �y DATE:. December 19, 2008 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF D T®: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer ` ;A SUBJECT: Proposed Crosstown Medical Building 4010 West 65th Street Engineering has reviewed the revised plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O Need truck - turning movements for new delivery area. O Need executed cross access easement prior to issuing permits. Sheet — C3 Preliminary Site Plan: 1. Show dimensions of radii at driveways. 2. How is snow removed from snow dump area? - Sheet — C5 Preliminary Utility Plan: 1. Replace easterly sanitary sewer service all the way to main or reline with CIPP liner. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. GAEngineering \Genera1\60 - 69 Streets\4010 West 65th Street\20081219 review of Crosstown Medical Building.doc u- I —� KEFUK'1 %KLC:UMMEN UA IUN To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II.D. Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: January 20, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Continue the public hearing on the Final Site Plan and Action ® Motion parking stall variance for Phase I of the Gateway Resolution Redevelopment Project. Ordinance Discussion Recommended Action: Continue the public hearing to February 3, 2009. AGENDA ITEM: DATE: IV.A. January 20, 2009 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DEPUTY CHIEF JEFF LONG VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF ITEM DESCRIPTION: In -Squad Video System COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. , Action Fleet Inc. (ICOP System) 1. $95,595.00 2. L3 Communications (Mobile- Vision System) 2. $93,020.00 3. Digital Ally 3. $86,415.00 4. Panasonic 4. $158,415.00 * All vendors bid different capacity servers. Prices would be adjusted if servers were of equal size. RECOMMENDED BID: Action Fleet Inc. This item has $50,000.00 budgeted in the 2008 Capital Plan. The remainder of the invoice will be paid via our DWI forfeiture fund. GENERAL INFORMATION: Action Fleet Inc. is the Minnesota authorized dealer for the ICOP video systems. ICOP is the only vendor that met all specifications requested in our bid which mirrored guidelines set by the International Association of Chiefs of Police. <'W POLICE Signature I Department The Recq#meoed Bi's/ f ry (within budget) F1 (not within budget) Gordon L. Hughes, City Mager ,,John Wallin, Finance Director o e • �n��bRroM'��9/ TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes; City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 January 20, 2009 AGENDA ITEM IV_ B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Toro Groundsmaster 4500 -D Rotary Mower Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. MTI Distributing 1. $37,535.69 State; Contract #440438 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 5400.1740 MTI Distributing (includes sales tax) GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a 2009 Toro Groundsmaster 4500 -D rotary mower for Braemar Golf Course. This new rotary mower replaces a 2003 Toro 4700 -D rotary mower. The $37,535.69 cost includes a $12,000 trade -in allowance for the 2003 rotary mower. This new Toro Groundsmaster 4500 -D rotary mower is used to cut the rough areas (not fairways) of Braemar's 27 championship holes and 9 executive course holes of golf. This new Toro 4500 -D cuts a grass swath 109" wide and the 2003 trade -in mower cuts a 150" swath. Braemar maintenance staff is recommending a smaller replacement unit to cut down on maintenance expenses. Alternate bids are not required because it is being purchased under the State Contract #440438. This purchase is funded under the Maintenance Equipment Replacement budget, which is budgeted at $140,000 for 2009. John Kep s, Director This Recommended bid is within budget Edina Park- and Recreation- Department not within bL4get/ I bo - allir finance Director Gordon Hughes( Aity Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: January 20, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: IV. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Air Handling Replacement — Edinborough Park DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED: January 13, 2009 Company 1. Master Mechanical 2. Doody Mechanical 3. Metropolitan Mechanical 4. Egan Company 5. Schadegg Mechanical 6. Harris Companies RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Master Mechanical $356,700.00 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE: February 26, 2009 Base Bid Add - Alternate 1. $356,700.00 $76,000.00 2. $368,475.00 $180,080.00 3. $378,000.00 $89,500.00 4. $383,942.00 $136,058.00 5. $411,000.00 $149,000.00 6. $419,120.00 $132,870.00 ACCOUNT #: 5600.1720 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of two replacement roof top heating and air conditioning units for Edinborough Park. These units are the only source of heating and air conditioning for the main park area, which includes the Great Hall, Adventure Peak, grotto area, amphitheater, birthday party area and admissions. The existing roof top HVAC units were installed in 1987. These units have exceeded their life expectancy and have required a significant amount of maintenance on their heat exchangers and need replacement. This is a 2009 Capital Improvement Plan project for Edinborough Park budgeted at $500,000. We had asked our consulting engineer to include an add - alternate to price out an additional energy savings component unit called an evaporative cooled roof top unit. As stated in his letter, our consulting engineer Randy Olson from Dunham Associates recommends that we not accept the add - alternate. His calculations suggest that the pay back in savings will be greater than 10 years and it will become an additional complex and expensive piece of equipment to maintain. In addition, the add - alternate will put us over budget. After bids were opened, Master Mechanical informed us that they made an error in excess of $40,000.00 in their add - alternate bid. Even if we were to re -bid this project, we would not include the add - alternate. After our consulting engineer analyzed the existing 1987 HVAC units and then held a meeting with our Building Coordinator Steve Kirchman, Fire Marshall Tom Jenson, Manager of Edinborough Park Ann Kattreh, Assistant Manager Susie Miller and myself, it was determined that a smoke evacuation system study would need to be conducted in order to ensure that the replacement units are properly engineered and function in accordance with fire codes mandated for that facility. Therefore, Summit Fire Consulting was hired for a fixed fee of $5,800.00 to conduct the smoke evacuation study. Summit provided a 34 page report on the results and findings of the smoke evacuation study, which assisted in establishing final specifications for the replacement roof top HVAC units. The study also resulted in an addendum specifying the need to provide a 10' x 9' thermally broken and insulated damper at the tunnel intake for the smoke control make -up air fan, and repair a sheet metal divider for the tunnel fan to prevent short cycling of air which is another critical component of the smoke evacuation system. The total project costs are anticipated to be approximately $389,500. Master Mechanical $356,700 Dunham Engineering $27,000 Summit Fire Consulting $5,800 TOTAL $389,500 Master Mechanical is a very reputable firm and we also awarded the bid to do the Edinborough Park pool ventilation upgrade project in 2008. They were awarded the 72 "d Street Lift Station project in 2008 and served as the general contractor for the entire project. Utility Superintendent Roger Glanzer informed me that Master Mechanical did an excellent job and he would not hesitate to hire them again for future projects. Master Mechanical also worked with Kraus Anderson on the Edina High School expansion project and with Weil Builders on the Container Store project in Edina. Staff recommends award of bid to Master Mechanical for $356,700. If approved by Council, the work will be completed by May 29, 2009. John K r' s, Director This Recommended bid is: \ within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department [7 on Hughes, City allin, Finance Director DUNHAM MI MR, 0ELIV RS. January 14, 2009 John Keprios City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Comm. No.: 04 -09095 Project: Edinborough Park Air Handling Replacement Re: Bid Review Dear John: We have received your summary of the bids that you received yesterday for this project. Per our discussion today and with consideration to the cost to implement Add Alternate #1, it is our recommendation to consider the low bidder on this project based on the Base Bid only and to not accept Add Alternate #1. Based on the summary provided, Master Mechanical is the apparent low bidder. I have worked with Master Mechanical in the past and have no concerns regarding their qualifications. Reg Randall M. Olson; PE, LEED AP Project Manager 03JKHAN Se,gh SkIl t WFA i. Suite 1164 Khosep0% mmeams 0402,9440 qw-W 61AAS-7"0 rw 414.440.7z. t P.10409095- 000-00 Edinborough Park AHU101- GeneraMid Recommendation - 20090914 doc vAA dItr'her W*V*M l)l 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V.A. From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: January 20, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Utility Fees and Charges Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Utility Fees Ordinance 2009 -1. Info /Background: Attached are the following schedules for Utility fees and charges proposed for 2009. 1) Ordinance No. 2009 -1 amending Code Section 185 Increasing Utility Fees. 2) Memo on proposed usage charge to be charged for utility customers using water purchased from the City of Minneapolis, including the Morningside area. 3) Schedule of General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01- Schedule A. Recycling fees were approved by Ordinance 2008 -10 in December. 4) Utility Rate Study by Ehlers & Associates. ORDINANCE NO. 2009-1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: PURPOSE OF SECTION SUBSECTION FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT 1100 1100.03 Subd. Sewer Service: 2 1. Single Family, Town Houses, To and including 1600 cubic feet Two - Family Dwellings, $42.72 /quarter from 1601 c.f. & Apartment building with four or over $2.67/100 c.f. less dwelling units 2. Apartment building with more $38.44 /quarter or $2.67 per 100 c.f. than four dwelling units. whichever is greater 3. Commercial and industrial $42.72 /quarter /meter. or $2.67 per buildings, including schools and 100 c.f. whichever is greater churches 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Water Service: 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of $1.05 up to 3500 c.f. City, except areas described in #2 $1.39 3600 to 6500 c.f. below: $2.18 over 6500 c.f. 2. For Momingside area and for $3.21/100 c.f. east side of Beard Av. from W. 54'' St. to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott Pl. from W 54th St. to Beard Av. 3. Domestic accounts used by $1.05 Up to 3500 cubic feet commercial and industrial $1.39 Over 3500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches. 4. Lawn watering accounts used by $1.39 Up to 3500 cubic feet commercial and industrial $2.18 Over 3500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches. 5. Meter charge $12.78 /quarter for up to % inch meter $17.41 /quarter for 1 inch meter $19.86 /quarter for 1 '/4 inch meter $22.34 /quarter for 1 '/z inch meter $35.98 /quarter for 2 inch meter $136.62 /quarter for 3 inch meter $173.90/ uarter for 4 inch meter 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge $16.79 per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 110.03 i Memo To: Mayor & City Council From: Finance Department Date: January 15, 2009 Re: Momingside water rates History and Introduction The Momingside area of Edina has always been connected to the Minneapolis water system. Edina pays Minneapolis for all the water that crosses the border at a rate set by Minneapolis, which was $2.84 per 100 cubic feet (unit) in 2008. Edina owns and maintains all water infrastructure located in the Momingside area, which consists mostly of watermains and meters. Edina also provides all the administrative services associated with water service, including meter reading, billing and payment processing, and service orders. Edina charges Momingside water users a fixed quarterly meter charge and a usage charge of $0.02 per unit of consumption above the Minneapolis rate. There is no tiered rate in the Momingside area like there is in the rest of Edina. The meter charges and the usage charges are Edina's only water revenue in the Momingside area and therefore should be designed cover the administrative and infrastructure costs already described. Momingside Revenues Edina charges all water users a fixed quarterly charge based on the size of the meter installed. We estimate there were 627 water meters in the Momingside area in 2008. Almost all of the meters in the Momingside area are 5/8° or 3/4 , and Edina's charge for both of these meter sizes was $12.01 per quarter in 2008, or $48.04 for the full year. We estimate that fixed charges for the entire Momingside area resulted in revenues of $30,349 during 2008. Edina also charges Momingside users $0.02 for each unit of water consumption. Our utility billing system shows that we billed 72,704 units of water consumption in the Momingside area in 2008, which amounts to an average of 116 units per connection. Edina charged Momingside users .a total of $1,454 in consumption charges during 2008. Fixed meter charges plus usage charges for the Momingside area totaled $31,893 in 2008. Momingside Expenses Administrative costs include meter reading, billing and payment processing, and service orders. The total budget for administrative costs was $436,403 in 2008 for all of Edina's water system. We are estimating that 3,131,953 units of water was consumed in all of Edina in 2008, which means that our administrative costs equate to about $0.14 per unit system -wide. The Momingside area used 72,704 units of water during the year, meaning that allocated administrative costs were $10,131 in 2008. Infrastructure costs include mostly watennains and meters in the Momingside area, since the wells, purification, and storage are part of the Minneapolis charges. It is generally preferable to build water infrastructure in conjunction with road reconstruction due to cost savings. The Engineering Department analyzed the current costs of this type of Page 1 Momingside Water Rates continued watermain infrastructure replacement and estimated that it would cost Edina approximately $1,339,362 to replace all the watermains in the Momingside area if that project were bid in current dollars as part of a road reconstruction project This estimate is based on the cost per linear foot of watermain being installed as part of the Country Club project. If we assume that these watermains would last for 50 years, the total cost per year to build Momingside's watermain infrastructure in today's dollars is $26,787. There are also maintenance costs associated with this watermain infrastructure after it is installed. For purposes of this rate study, we are conservatively projecting one watermain break every other year in the Momingside area. Although every watermain break is different, the Engineering Department estimates that the average watermain break costs $5,000 to repair. Therefore we estimated $2,500 per year in infrastructure maintenance costs for the Momingside area. We estimate there were 627 water meters for water users in the Momingside area in 2008 plus one main meter at 4CP and France that measures the amount of water that is pumped into Edina from Minneapolis. Costs for meters vary by size, but the range is approximately $240 for a small residential meter to $10,000 for the main meter. The total cost of all the meters in the Momingside area is over $160,000 in 2008 dollars. With an estimated useful life of 20-25 years for most meters, we estimate that the annual cost in today's dollars for water meters in the Momingside area is $6,620. Summary and Conclusion When added up, the total estimated costs for the Momingside area outlined above are greater than the estimated revenues by $14,145 per year, as shown below. In order to bring total revenues into line with total expenses, we recommend increasing the consumption charge to $0.21 per unit. Minneapolis has notified Edina that their charges will also. be increasing in 2009 to $3.00 per unit from $2.84 per unit in 2008. Therefore Momingside water users would see an increase from $2.86 per unit in 2008 to $3.21 per unit in 2009 under this proposal. While this increase appears large at first, it is actually smaller than the water rate increases the rest of Edina has seen since we started the current version of rate studies in 2007. From 2006 to 2009, the water rate for the first tier of usage has increased 22% for most Edina water users, and this increase would be much higher if tiers' 2 and 3 were considered. In contrast, rates for the Momingside area will increase only 16% over the same time period even if rates are adopted as proposed. We believe a 2009 consumption rate of $0.21 per unit for the Momingside area will be adequate to cover all costs in a manner that is fair to all our users. In addition, we recommend that this analysis should become part of the regular utility rate study so that these estimates are revisited periodically and updated for inflation and other changes. Morningside Rate Study Exhibit 1 2008 Actual Proposed Revenues Momingside meter charges 30,439 30,439 Momingside consumption revenue 1,454 15,268 Total Momingside annual revenue 31,893 45,707 Expenses Momingside administration costs 10,131 10,131 Momingside watermain infrastructure cost 26,787 26,787 Momingside watermain maintenance cost 2,500 2,500 Momingside meter cost 6,620 6,620 Total Momingside annual costs 46,038 46,038 Morningside Annual Income (Loss) (14,145) (331) Page 2 City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A Proposed 2008 2009 AMOUNT DEPT REV 716 716.02 Subd. 2 Recycling Single Family 4.90 6.75 Per quarter Health 4640 Double Bungalow 4.90 6.75 Per quarter Health 4640 Apts Condos 2 - 8 Units 4.10 6.15 Per quarter Health 4640 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Sewer Service Charge: Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (November 1 to March 1) Single Family Dwellings, Townhouses, Two - Family Dwellings, Apartment Buildings Containing Four or Less 40.96 42.72 Per quarter up to and including 1600 cubic feet Finance 4641 Dwelling Units: 2.56 2.67 Additional from 1601 cubic feet and over Finance 4641 Apartment Buildings with More Than 36.86 38.44 Per quarter for each unit over four or Finance 4641 Four Dwelling Units: 2.56 2.67 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 40.96 42.72 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises, or Finance 4641 Including Schools and Churches: 2.56 2.67 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 1100 1100.04 Subd. 1.0 Issuance of Water Meter Cost of water meter, plus handling charges Finance 4627 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Water Service 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of City, except as described in #2 below 0.99 1.05 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4626 1.31 1.39 From 3600 cubic feet to 6500 cubic feet Finance 4626 2.05 2.18 Over 6500 cubic feet Finance 4626 2.86 3.21 2. Per 100 cubic feet - Morningside area and for east side of Beard Finance 4626 Ave. from West 54th to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott PI. from West 54th St. to Beard Ave. Domestic accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 0.99 1.05 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Including Schools and Churches: 1.31 1.39 Over 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Lawn watering accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.31 1.39 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Including Schools and Churches: 2.05 2.18 Over 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Meter Charge: 12.01 12.78 Per quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter Finance 4627 16.36 17.41 Per quarter for 1 inch meter Finance 4627 18.66 19.86 Per quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter Finance 4627 21.00 22.34 Per quarter for 1 1/2 inch meter Finance 4627 33.81 35.98 Per quarter for 2 inch meter Finance 4627 128.40 136.62 Per quarter for 3 inch meter Finance 4627 163.44 173.90 Per quarter for 4 inch meter Finance 4627 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge 15.54 16.79 Per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Finance 4642 City of Edina, Minnesota Water, Storm Water &Sewer Utility Rate Study 2009 Update January 20, 2009 Prepared By: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 697 -8500 Introduction The City of Edina requested that Ehlers & Associates update the rate study of its water, storm water, and sanitary sewer system utilities initially completed in January of 2007 and updated in early 2008. The purpose of the rate study is to ensure that: 1. Rates are sufficient to pay for the ongoing operations and capital improvements, and to maintain adequate cash balances; and, The rate structure distributes the costs of operating the system across utility users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. ]background The need to reinvest in the City's aging utility systems has placed new financial stresses on the .utility fund, particularly related to water. The City's recent and projected investments for replacing and improving the water and sewer systems are significant. Between 2004 and 2006, the City spent over $15 million on capital improvements in the utility fund. The City financed just over half of these costs and paid cash for the remainder, resulting in an extremely low year- end cash balance in the combined utility fund. Faced with increasing capital costs, the City increased user rates in 2006 and 2007. In addition, in 2007 the City modified water rates to add usage tiers. The usage tiers charge higher water rates at higher levels of consumption. The rationale for a tiered rate structure was three -fold: A tiered rate structure may promote water conservation and is now required by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for all metropolitan cities with water utilities serving more than 1,000 people by January 1, 2010. 2. By charging more for water used on the lawn than water used in the home, the City is ensuring that essential water use remains as affordable as possible. 3. Cities construct water systems to meet the capacity of peak watering days in the summer. In Edina, the peak summer demand is approximately three times the average daily winter demand. A tiered rate system charges more per gallon for peak use, thereby allocating the cost of "oversizing" the system for peak days to the peak users. The purpose of this update is to determine how rates will need to be adjusted for 2009 and beyond to keep the utilities financially self - sufficient. This study incorporates the proposed 2009 -2013 capital improvement plan for the utilities, and the city engineer's estimates of future capital costs from 2014 and beyond. It should be noted that the City currently has one accounting fund for water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and recycling. For this analysis, we segregated the revenues and expenses for each utility, and treated each as a separate fund. By doing so, we can ensure that each utility will "pay its own way." Municipal utility funds are considered "enterprise funds," meaning they are intended to be operated as a private enterprise in which the fee revenue pays for all expenses. For purposes of this study, we refer to each segregated utility as its own fund. Following is a chart that summarizes the significant assumptions in the rate study. N Assumption Growth and • No new connections. Utility Usage • Water usage will continue at 2008 levels. • Sewer usage will remain constant. Operating • City expenses increase 3% annually Expenses • MCES sanitary sewer disposal fees increase 5.5% annually Capital Water: Averages $4.8 million per year through 2013; averages $1.0 million Expenses per year in 2014 and thereafter except for a major water treatment improvement of $10 million in 2016. Sanitary Sewer: Averages $1 million per year. Storm Water: Averages $2.5 to $3 million per year. Average capital costs are in today's dollars. Costs of improvements are inflated 4% per year in the rate study. Rate Structure No change proposed to proposed rate structures. • Water has quarterly fixed charge and usage fee (see below) • Sewer billed based on winter quarter water consumption. • Storm water is fixed quarterly charge based on property use. N Water Utility Water Fees There are two primary components to the City's water utility revenues: Meter Charges are a fixed quarterly fee based on the size of meter in the home or business. The meter charge is established to recover certain fixed expenses, such as the billing system, that the City must incur for a customer regardless of the amount of water consumed. The meter charge varies with meter size, and is proposed to increase 6.4% in 2009. Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water. Beginning in 2007 the City instituted a tiered rate system, as discussed above. All types of property are included in the tiering of rates, although at different levels. Morningside area residents obtain their water from the City of Minneapolis. The City of Edina charges Morningside residents a meter fee and is proposing a $.21 per 100 cubic feet usage charge over the rate charged by the City of Minneapolis. The City of Minneapolis has indicated that the rate they will charge Edina will increase from $2.84 to $3.00 per 100 cubic feet. Proposed Residential Water Rates Projected rate increases for residential users are shown in the following chart. These are consistent with the rates proposed in the January, 2007 rate study. Usage Proposed User Char es Gallons 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Rate Increase 0 -35 units 8.14% $0.93 6.40% $0.99 6.40% $1.05 6.40% $1.12 6.40% $1.19 6.40% $1.27 6.40% $1.35 6.40°% $1.44 6.40% $1.53 6.40% $1.63 Rate Increase 36.65 unitsi 43.02% $1.23 6.40% $1.31 6.40°% $1.39 6.40% $1.48 6.40% $1.58 6.40°% $1.68 6.40°% $1.78 6.40°% $1.90 6.40% $2.02 6.40% $2.15 R-W inerease >,65 ni' 24A% 1$ I'M 6:40% 205 6:40"% -218 640°% $2.32 6:400/. $2.47 6:406/. $2.63 6:400% $2.80 6:40°% $2:98 6:40°% $3.17 6.40 $3.371 Irrigation /Sprinkler Meters Water connections used solely for sprinklers are charged at the middle tier rate of $1.31 per unit for 0 -65 units per quarter, and $2.05 for each unit over 65 units. The proposed rate increases are $1.39 and $2.18, respectively. Commercial Customers 3 Commercial customers are charged on the first two tiers. Water consumption of 0 -35 units is $.99 per unit, and all water consumption over 35 units is $1.31 per unit. The proposed 2009 rates are $1.05 and $1.39 respectively. Water Connection Fees The City of Edina charges $800 per residential equivalency unit for new development. These connection fees will help pay for the capital costs of serving the new properties. To be conservative, the financial analysis does not count on any development related connection fee revenue for 2009 and beyond. We would recommend that the City increase its connections fees annually by an inflationary factor. Operating Margins and Cash Balance Below is a chart that demonstrates the future cash balances for the water fund. It is important to remember that the water fund income will vary significantly by the volume of water used by residents and businesses. The amount of rain in a summer is a primary determinant of the volume of water usage. The tiering of rates does augment the fluctuations in income because the marginal use of water is priced at the highest tier. Water Operating Revenue and Expenses (without Debt Service) 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000.000 2,000,000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 �� Operating Revenue � Operagng Expenses —Cash Balance 4 When debt service is factored into the cash flow, it is evident why the cash balance is declining: Water Operating Revenue and Expenses (with Debt Service) I A nnn nnn Cash Balances and Prudent Use of Debt Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue depending on weather, and to fund unexpected repairs and a portion of capital improvements. In the short-term, the City is targeting a minimum cash balance of $2,000,000. Over the long term, the City's goal is a cash balance equal to 50% of operating revenues. The chart below demonstrates the projected cash balance and the City's goal for operating reserves. In order to return to a positive cash position and achieve the target cash level over the long term, the City will need to finance almost all of its future capital improvements. Capital projects financed with debt are amortized over a ten -year period and interest rates are estimated based on a spread over current market conditions. The chart below demonstrates how much capital is to be expended and how much debt is to be issued in each year: Water Capital Expenses and Debt Issues 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 O- 00 O°' Z NN Nr1 NO '��` '�� orb '�A b N1 1b, �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O If, ■ Capital Expeditures ■ Bond Proceeds It is unrealistic to expect ratepayers to fund the level of proposed improvements and fully fund depreciation at the same time. By keeping the term of the debt to ten years, the City will be able to: 1) Protect its bond rating; and 2) Allow time after the debt is retired to fund replacement reserves and reduce reliance on debt in the future. The City Council has talked about methods to reduce the amount of debt and pay more cash for the capital improvements. One method would be to increase water rates by 7.4% per year rather than 6.4 %. This additional funding could allow the City to issue approximately $2 million less in debt every other year and still get to the same cash balance in 2019/2020. However, the lower amount of debt does reduce the cash balance as well in the early years to well below $1 million: R Lower Debt Issuance with 7.4% Annual Increase in Rates — Water Fund 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 ,yo �yo �yo �yo �yo �yo �yo yo �o yo �o �yo �yo ■ Capital Expeditures ■ Bond Proceeds Another consideration was to put all commercial users on the third tier of usage. This would push most commercial water rates up significantly because most of their water use would be in the rate per unit (100 cubic feet) of $2.21 rather $1.41. The overall net annual increase would be approximately $377,000 in 2009 and then inflated each year. This increased revenue is lower than one may expect because commercial use is a rather small percentage of total water usage (less than 10 %). Commercial irrigation meters are already in the third tier. The overall result is very similar to increasing all usage by 1% as shown in the chart above. Lower Debt Issuance with Commercial in Third Tier — Water Fund 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 �O �O (O 'f, rp O rp O rp rp ■ Capital Expeditures ■ Bond Proceeds 7 Recommendation for Water Fees Based on the completed rate study, we would recommend: 1) The 2009 meter charges and usage water rates increase 6.4% over 2008, consistent with the previous rate analysis. 2) The City Council review and establish water rates on an annual basis. The analysis projects 6.4% annual water rate increases after 2009. Sanitary Sewer Utility Sewer Fees The City of Edina participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sanitary sewer system. The City is responsible for the sewer collection system within the City limits and then pays MCES disposal fees for treatment. The MCES disposal fees have increased 5 - 9% each of the last four years. The rate study anticipates that future increases for these fees will be 5.5 %, annually. The MCES disposal fees comprise almost 70% of the sewer utility's operating expenses. Another 5% of expenditures represent depreciation, while only 25% of operating expenditures are within the City's control. Sewer Rate Structure The 2608 rate structure is $2.56 per unit of sewer. One unit is 100 cubic feet or approximately 750 gallons. The sewer usage is assumed to be identical to water usage during the winter quarter when there is almost no outside water use (car washing, lawn sprinkling, swimming pool, etc.). There is a minimum quarterly fee, regardless of use, of $40.96 (16 units or 1600 cubic feet). The minimum charge helps pay for the fixed costs of the system. Proposed Sewer Rates The projected rate increase for sanitary sewer is 4.5% per year for the next ten years. We do not recommend changing the rate structure at this time. The unit charge and the minimum quarterly charge would both be increased by 4.5 %. The proposed rate per unit is in the chart below. Sanitary Sewer 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Rate per $2.34 $2.45 $2.56 $2.67 $2.79 $2.92 $3.05 $3.18 $3.33 $3.48 $3.63 Unit Sanitary Sewer City Connection Fees The City charges a sewer connection fee for new users to "buy -in" to the system. Connection fees are paid at the time a builder or homeowner pulls a building permit. The 2008 and 2009 connection fee in the City of Edina is $400 per residential equivalency unit. In addition, the City collects the MCES connection fee and remits it to the Metropolitan Council. The City sewer connection fees will help offset City sanitary sewer infrastructure costs associated with new development and redevelopment. To be conservative, the projections presented in the Appendices to the rate study do not 7 consider the collection of any connection fee revenues for projects not already approved. We would recommend an annual inflationary increase to the connection fee. The sewer fund currently is expected to operate more at higher operating margins than the water fund. The main volatility in this fund will be the MCES expenses and the City's expenses. 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6.000,000 5,000,000 4,000, 000 3,000,000 2,000.000 1,000.000 0 Sanitary Sewer Operating Margins (without Debt) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Operating Revenue Operating Expenses -Cash Balance 10 Sanitary Sewer Operating Revenue and Expenses (with Debt Service) When debt service is factored in, the margins also look better because the sewer fund is expected to have much lower capital needs in the future than the water fund. Cash Balances The target cash balance for the sewer fund equals 50% of sewer operating revenues. Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue, pay for new and unexpected regulatory requirements, to fund a portion of capital improvements, and to establish replacement reserves. Sanitary Sewer Cash Balances 11 The graph below portrays the projected cash balances based on the stated assumptions and proposed capital expenditures. It can be seen that the proposed rate increases and more minimal use of debt financing should be adequate to achieve the target cash balance. Sanitary Sewer Capital Expenses and Debt Issues Recommendation for Sanitary Sewer Fees Based on the completed rate study, we would recommend that the City continue to increase sewer rates 4.5% per year, in order to meet the goals of funding capital improvements of the system and a 50% operating reserve balance. 12 Storm Water Rates Over the next five years, the City anticipates approximately $10.7 million in capital costs to address storm water from drain tile systems, expand storm water ponds, rehabilitate lift stations and replace its aging storm water system. Storm water rates will need to be increased to fund the capital projects and maintain minimum cash reserves. The City's current quarterly storm water rate is $15.54 per quarter. The proposed rate increases in the chart below will allow the City to maintain and improve its storm water infrastructure, as well as sustaining adequate cash reserves. These rates are consistent with the rates proposed in the 2007 and 2008 rate analysis, and are comparable with other fully developed metro area communities. Actual 2005 Actual 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $6.74 $10.74 $14.39 $15.54 $16.79 $18.13 $19.58 $21.15 $22.84 $24.66 $26.64 Cities across the state will be facing pressure to generate more revenue to fund storm water systems. The Clean Water Legacy Act provided funding to test and develop plans for Minnesota's polluted waterways. These plans may result in new unfunded mandates for local governments. While the future requirements for managing the quality and quantity of storm water are unknown, the level of projected capital expenses in this study should pay for many of the mandated improvements. Our experience with other cities indicates that most have not yet planned for significant improvements to their storm water system, and their quarterly fees are established at a level that will only pay for the annual operations and maintenance of the storm water system. As more cities undertake planning for capital improvements to their storm water systems, we expect to see higher storm water utility fees across the metro area. 13 Storm Water Expenses and Revenues including Debt 6,000,000 -- 5,000,000 4,000,000 .. i 3,000,000 — 2,000,000 1,000,000 OA 00 O°' NO ��` �`t' NO NtK Nb NO NA N00 NO � Operating Expenses � Debt Service Operating Revenues The chart above indicates that most of the capital improvements will need to be funded with debt unless the City decides to increase the quarterly fee more than the 8% projected increases. Cash Balances The purpose of the cash balance is to allow the City to fund routine improvements on a "pay -as- you-go" basis, reserving the use of debt for major improvements, and have operating reserves available for cashflow purposes. It is our recommendation that the system be operated to maintain a minimum cash balance of $500,000. The projected cash balances, assuming the proposed rates above, are shown in the following graphs. 14 i 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Storm Water Capital Expenses and Debt Issues 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 ■ Capital Expeditures ■ Bond Proceeds Storm Water Cash Balances (500,000) 1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ?A5 2016 2017 2018 2019 �— Target Cash Balance — Estirrated Cash Balance It should be noted that the large cash balance in 2008 is the result of bond proceeds which will be expended on 2009 capital projects. 15 Even though the cash balances are expected to decline in the future, we would recommend that the City monitor the capital expenses over the next few years to see if the expected levels of improvements are necessary. Sample Utility Bills The chart below shows the total utility bill for sample residents who use varying amounts of water. Because residents view their utilities together in one bill, we have included water, sanitary, and storm water charges, along with a cumulative total. City of Edina Sample Projected Residential Utility Bills Sample Family Quarterly E 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 36.40 39.19 41.70 44.37 47.21 50.23 53.44 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 117.34 $126.94 $133.90 $141.26 $ 149.05 $ 157.29 $166.01 Combined Fee Increase Combined Fee Increase $ 9.60 $ 6.96 $ 7.36 $ 7.79 $ 8.24 $ 8.72 Percent Increase Percent Increase 8.2% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 53.60 62.29 66.28 70.52 75.03 79.83 84.94 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 134.54 $150.04 $158.48 $167.41 $ 176.87 $186.89 $197.51 Combined Fee Increase $ 15.50 $ 8.44 $ 8.93 $ 9.46 $ 10.02 $ .10.61 Percent Increase 11.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% Sample-Summer Quarterly . _ 2006 _ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 100 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 96.60 148.29 157.78 167.88 178.62 190.05 202.22 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 177.54 $ 236.04 $ 249.98 $ 264.77 $ 280.47 $ 297.11 $ 314.78 Combined Fee Increase $ 58.50 $ 13.94 $ 14.79 $ 15.69 $ 16.65 $ 17.67 Percent Increase 33.0% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% Utility Rate Comparison The City of Edina has historically had relatively low utility rates. Rate increases that began in 2006 now make Edina comparable to many metro area communities. A comparison of a typical residential utility bill to other communities is in the following chart. Please note that the usage in the comparative chart below is lower than the three sample bills shown above. Also note that several cities, such as Bloomington, Richfield, and Minneapolis though Morningside, do provide softened water. 16 City of Edina 2008 Water Rate Comparison Based on Residential Service Assumes Quarterly use of 36 units water and 18 units sewer Summary The City of Edina has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for improvements on a cash basis in the past. However, the need to reinvest in the water and sewer utility system over the next several years has put new financial pressures on all of the utility funds. The rate study indicates that rate increases are necessary in 2009 to rebuild cash balances and pay for capital improvements. Modest and steady annual rate increases will be needed for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities to pay for City operating costs and capital improvements. While this analysis proposes the use of debt to allow for steady and predictable rate increases, it is not a debt plan. The City should review whether it has sufficient cash to pay for capital improvements prior to issuing debt. At its option, the City may accumulate less cash in its utility funds (thereby funding less depreciation) in order to reduce the amount of new debt issued for utility improvements. As with all other bonding decisions, the City's decision to issue debt for any given improvement will be 17 Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly City Water Sewer Storm Total Chanhassen 49.72 46.66 8.11 104.49 Inver Grove Heights 65.13 44.27 0.00 109.40 (excludes Northwest Area) Edina - 2008 47.97 46.08 15.54 109.60 Bloomington 61.61 35.13 13.59 110.33 St. Louis Park 48.25 52.31 12.25 112.81 Richfield 63.18 54.20 10.35 127.73 Minnetonka 72.50 41.89 15.30 129.69 99.72 46 -08 15 -54 161. -34 'Edina-- Morningside = 2008 Summary The City of Edina has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for improvements on a cash basis in the past. However, the need to reinvest in the water and sewer utility system over the next several years has put new financial pressures on all of the utility funds. The rate study indicates that rate increases are necessary in 2009 to rebuild cash balances and pay for capital improvements. Modest and steady annual rate increases will be needed for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities to pay for City operating costs and capital improvements. While this analysis proposes the use of debt to allow for steady and predictable rate increases, it is not a debt plan. The City should review whether it has sufficient cash to pay for capital improvements prior to issuing debt. At its option, the City may accumulate less cash in its utility funds (thereby funding less depreciation) in order to reduce the amount of new debt issued for utility improvements. As with all other bonding decisions, the City's decision to issue debt for any given improvement will be 17 based on many factors, including the City's cash balances, rating, and other financing needs. Appendices to this report follow: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Water Utility Projections Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections Storm Water Utility Projections OR City , dA er For Discussion Pu )nly Utility Funds - Water Fund Other revenue increase Expenditure increase Investment Earnings 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00°/. 3.00% 3.00°/. 3.001/. 3001% 3.00% 3.00'/. 3.001/. 3.00% 3.001/6 3.00% 3.001/. 300% 3.00°/. 3.00°/. 3.001/. 3.0054 3.00'% 3.001/. 3.001/. 3.001/. 3. 0°/. 3.00°/ 3.00°/. 3,00% 3.00°/. 3.00°/. 3.001/. 3.001/. 3.001/. 3.00% 3.001/. Per Financial Statement Projected 852,248 906,792 964,826 1,026,575 1,092,276 1,162,182 1,236,561 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 I Revenues _ Charges for services 3,193,444 3,917,922 + Quarterly Meter Service Charges 666,877 800,985 852,248 906,792 964,826 1,026,575 1,092,276 1,162,182 1,236,561 1,315,701 1,399,906 1,489,500 1,584,828 3 Charges for Water Usage 2,684,094 4,774,168 4,216,485 4,486,340 4,773,466 5,078,968 5,404,022 5,749,879 6,117,871 6,509,415 6,926,018 7,369,283 7,840,917 8,342,735 5 Sale of Water Meters 33,513 o Water Testing 73,264 73,176 81 ,317 83,654 86,164 88,749 91,411 94,153 %,978 99,887 102,884 105,970 109,149 112,424 115,797 119,271 Other 109,081 72,374 69,614 71,703 73,854 76,069 78,352 80,702 83,123 85,617 88,185 90,831 93,556 96,363 9953 102,231 8 ` Total operating revenues 3,375,789 3,496,521 4,068,754 4,963,038 5,177,487 5,503,406 5,850,020 6,218,649 6,610,698 7,027,659 7,471,122 7,942,778 8,444,424 8,977,975 9,545,467 10,149,065 II Expenses 1: 10 Admin 427,602 503,166 480,948 516,471 436,403 464,216 478,142 492,487 507,261 522,479 538,153 554,298 570,927 588,055 605,696 623,867 1, Buildings 29,624 32,197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ire Water Distribution 1,241,981 1,343,347 1,746,996 1,700,801 1,719,228 1,863,323 1,919,223 1,976,799 2,036,103 2,097,186 2,160,102 2,224,905 2,291,652 2,360,402 2,431,214 2,504,150 I- Tanks, Towers, and Reservoirs 38,801 58,263 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Source of Supply 262,124 291,782 376,541 390,957 402,686 414,766 427,209 469,026 483,096 497,589 512,517 527,892 543,729 560,041 1r- Water Treatment 245,820 264,242 358,838 511,026 471, 954 608, 499 626,754 645,557 664,923 684,871 705,417 726,580 748,377 770,828 793,953 817,772 _ ^b Meter Reading 11,161 10,724 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Meter Repair 32,487 26,514 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equip Operation 55,571 58,656 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .> Training 16,848 9,207 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Depreciation 542,775 656,629 668,797 728,148 697,500 832,750 953,865 1,033,550 1,181,074 1,324,059 1,380,230 1,438,744 1,691,297 1,760,539 1,832,598 1,907,589 20 Total operating expense 2,642,668 2,962,943 3,517,702 3,748,227 3,701,626 4,159,745 4,380,670 4,563,159 4,816,571 5,097,621 5,266,998 5,442,116 5,814,770 6,007,716 6,207,191 6,413,419 27 28 Cash Oow 5t Operating income (loss) 733,121 533,578 551,052 1,179,876 1,475,861 1,343,661 1,469,350 1,655,491 1,794,126 1,930,038 2,204,124 2,500,662 2,629,654 2,970 ,259 3,338 ,276 3,735,646 S Depreciation 542,775 656,629 668,797 728,148 697,500 832,750 953,865 1,033,550 1,181,074 1,324,059 1,380,230 1,438,744 1,691,297 1,760,539 1,832,598 1,907,589 = Bond payments on existing debt (182,328) (184,935) (610,866) (553,463) (553,303) (554,770) (560,078) (556,868) (367,800) (364,800) (366,300) (367,200) 0 0 e.l Investment income 37,360 122,850 50,390 11,500 39,673 147,581 83,142 103,461 97,135 97,925 89,991 81,233 78,747 71,891 50,614 48,105 n. Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ry Capital (3,086397) (1,183,532) (5,774,240) (1,074,468) (6,464,640) (5,677,360) (4,806,630) (2,553,441) (5,825,8961 (5,377,606) (822,457) (855,356) (10,369,5531 (925,153), (962.1591 (1,000,635) 6'. Bond Proceeds 1062.766 8,459381 2,400,000 4,800,000 2,000,000 5,500,000 5,200,000 800,000 800,000 10,000,000 900,000 900,000 1,000,000 Bonds 68 Debt (P&I) - 2008 Bonds Actual (641,107) (958,338) (962,713) (965,431) (966,463) (970,625) (971,788) (974,700) (975,200) (979,200) (980,400) 69 Debt (P&I) - 2009 Bonds (5.0% for 10 years) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) (310,811) 7u Debt (P &I) - 2010 Bonds (5.01/. for 10 years) (621,622) (621,622) (621,622) (621,622) (621,622) (621,622) (621,622) (621,622) (621,622) 71 Debt (P&I) - 2011 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (262,163) (262,163) (262,163) (262,163) (262,163) (262,163) (262,163) (262,163) 72 Debt (P &I) - 2012 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) 73 Debt (P &I) - 2013 Bonds (53% for 10 years) (689,872) (689,872) (689,872) (689,872) (689,872) (689,872) 74 Debt (P&I) - 2014 Bonds (5.5a% for 10years) (106,134) (106,134) (106,134) (106,t34) (106,134) 75 Debt (P&I) - 2015 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (106,134) (106,134) (106,134) (106,134) 76 Debt (P&I) - 2016 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (1,326,678) (1,326,678) (1,326,678) 77 Debt (P &I) - 2017 Bonds (5.51/. for 10 years) (119,401) (119,401) 78 Debt (P&I) - 2018 Bonds (5.5a% for 10years) (119,401) 79 Debt (P &I) - 2019 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 8-: Debt (P &I) - 2020 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 8` Net Cahldw (1,773,341) IMMS (4,686.328) 3,722,886 3,596,910 (2,147.938) 677,276 1210,856) 26,335 (264.458) (291,955) (82,856) (228,540) (709,227) (83.634) 327,130 8[ 8- Beginning cash 1.322,442 4,919,352 2,771,415 3,448691 3,237,836 3,264,171 2,999,713 2,707,758 2,624,903 2,396,362 1687,135 1,603,501 SS S- Ending cash 1,322,442 4,919,352 2,771,415 3,448,691 3,237,836 3,264,171 2,999,713 2,767,758 2,624,903 2,396,362 1,687,135 1,603,501 1,930,631 91 9' Target cash balance (50% of operating revenues) 2,481,519 2,588344 2,751,703 2.925,010 3,109,325 3,305,349 3,513,830 3,735,561 3,971,389 4,222,212 4,488,98E 4,772733 5,074,533 Actual cash over (under) mmumum cash balance 1.150,.0 -71 2,330,609 19,712 523,681 128,511 (41,178) (514,117) (1,027,803) (1,346,486) (1,825,850) (2,801 852) (3,169,233) (3,143 902) Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 1116/2009 usty AW0.14.2009 City o, San Sewer For DismissionF ONy Utility Funds - Sanitary Sewer Fund Sanitary Sewer Charges Increase 4,W1. 4.50'/6 450'. 4.50•/6 1 001/6 4.006 4 001. 4001/6 3.9M. 350% 3.00% 3.00% Investment Rate 3 O0*1 3.(X11/. 300% 300% 3.((41/1 301% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.(M. 3.00% 3.0(11/. Other revenue Increase 3 00% 3.00% 300% 3 OM /. 3,(W/. 31)(11% 3 00% 3.001/. 3.00. 3.00% 3.00% 3001. MCES Disposal Cost Increase 5.50% 550% 5501. 5.501. 5.501/6 5501/. 550% 5.801. 5.50. 5.50. 5.50% 5.50/. Expenditure increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00. 3.001. 3. W% 300% 3 001. 3 001. 3.1(41% 3.00/. 3.00. 3006 Per Financial Statements Projected 2(X14 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Revenues Sewer Charges 5.029.790 5355 810 5,638396 5,866,775 5,900.000 6,061 000 6,333,745 6,618,764 6,883,514 7.159.955 7,445.209 7.743,017 9,014,023 8,294,514 8.543,349 8,799,649 Ga SAC Other 109.081 72,374 69,614 71,703 73,854 76,069 78,352 80,702 83.123 $5.617 88,185 90,831 93,556 96,363 99,253 102,231 Taal operating revenues 5,138871 5.429,194 5.708.210 5,939.478 5,973.954 6,137.069 6,412.097 6.699,466 6,966,637 7144,471 7,533.394 7.%33,949 8,107.579 9,390.876 9.642.602 9,901,990 Expenses Disposal Charges 3,049,321 3,033,441 3,442,190 3,589,992 3,900,000 4,132,873 4156,859 4,394,565 4,516,102 4,651,585 4,791,133 4,516,102 4,651,595 4,791,133 4,934,966 4,651,595 Admit 427,602 503,166 480,949 516,471 436,403 464,216 478,142 492,487 507,261 522,479 538,153 507,261 522,479 539,153 554,291 522,479 Pumping & Lift Stations 223,511 150,679 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Buildings 29,624 32,197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Meter Reading 11,161 10,724 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Meter Repair 32,487 26,514 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Equip Operation 55,571 59,656 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tninmg 16,948 9,207 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sewer Cleaning 61,671 63,379 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station Mamt 40,453 109,007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Misc Treatment 26,2% 21,651 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collection Systems 42,817 $2,435 311,371 479,587 398,877 478,286 504,592 532,344 561,623 592,512 625,101 659,481 695,753 734,019 774,390 816,912 Depreciation 303.498 275,994 334,398 364,074 348,750 416,375 443.966 473.1 92 497,379 536,999 553,109 594,702 602,243 620,311 638,920 658,088 ! Total operating expense 4,319,858 4,377,048 4,568,907 4,950,013 4,994,030 5,491,750 5,683,460 5,982.578 6,072,364 6,303,576 6,507,496 6167,547 6,472,060 6,683,616 6,902,475 6,649,133 Cash now Operating income (1-) 819.013 1 051,137 1,139.304 998.465 999.824 645,320 728.637 816,888 994.273 940.896 1,025 -899 1,566,301 1,635,519 1.707160 1.740.128 2152.747 Depreciation 303,498 275,994 334,398 364,074 348,750 416,375 443,866 473,182 487,378 536,999 553,109 594,702 602,243 620,311 639,920 6590118 Bond payments. 1999A (316,210) (316,710) (316,710) (315,9100) (314,700) (317,810) Bond payments. 2003C (182.328) (194,935) (186,860) (188,063) (188.503) (190,970) (192.778) (191.568) Bond Payments. 2007B (215,639) (193,600) (188,200) (187,500) (186,6W) (185,5W) (184,200) (187,600) (185,700) (183,600) - Miseellanous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Investment income 37,360 122.850 50,390 11.500 92.678 111172 69,618 79,853 78.249 91,434 79,028 96,330 105,022 115,819 129,773 1411281 4, Transfers 46,115 6L393 65,470 94,966 79.028 96,330 105,022 115,819 129,773 14X281 11 Met Council l &1 Surcharge (1150001 (130,11110) (130,000) (130,1(4(41) (130.000) 4' Met Council I &1 Surcharge Rebate (507) 57,500 0 65,000 63,000 65,000 4• Capital 11.906.329) (9256 %31 (n 1111,"6) 041,.1'') I,,5 %_, 111 ('.'45102) fN?%.M7) 14(,7"4,) (f946M5) (9 %5.72:) (u'I.1;11 1!117.99%) (I .;I %1 11.0 ?t.. 1711 (1.1-77,619) (1.120.7'1) 41 4< Bond proceeds - 1,556,501 3164,067 750,000 800,000 1,750,000 750,000 - - 4 • Bonds 4- Debt (PRI)- 2008Bonds .Actual (246,553) (369,363) (371,413) (372,813) (373,550) (373,589) (377,431) (375,025) (376,725) (377,825) (377,863) 4.1 Debt (P &1) -2009 Bonds (5.0//6 for 10 vears) (97,129) (97,128) (97,128) (97,128) (97,128) (97,128) (97,128) (97,128) (97,128) (97,129) 41, Debt (M) -2010 Bonds (5.25/1 for 10 years) (104.965) (104.965) (104,863) (104,965) (104,865) (104,865) (104,865) (104.965) (104,865) , Debt (M) -2011 Bonds (5156 for 10 I Debt (P &1) -2012 Bonds (5.25. for 10 years) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) .. Debt W.11) -2013 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` Debt (M) -2014 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 99,501 ( ) (99,501) (99,501) (99,501) (99,800 54 Debt (MI) - 2015 Bonds (5.5% for 10 veers) 0 0 0 0 Debt (P &D -2016 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 0 0 0 Debt (M) -2017 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 0 0 Debt (M) -2018 Bonds 15.5% for 10 years) 0 sa Debt (PLA) - 2019 Bonds 0.5% for 10 vears) 61 Crash Dow (962.669) ]07,999 29BA29 1A614M &Koo 11,l88,i611 341,176 t53,5141 437.540 (413-q32) 576,737 28!,747 359,976 431,925 650,265 1,177,926 n Beginning rash 3,099,254 3,709,054 2,320,593 2,661,769 2,608,255 3,047,795 2,634,263 3,211001 3,500,748 3,860624 4,292,450 4942,714 I, Ending cash 3,089,254 3,709,054 2,320593 2,661,769 2,608,255 3,047,795 2,634,263 3111,001 3,300,748 3,86(1624 4192,450 4,942,714 6,120,640 M1; Target Cash Balance (50% ofoperating re-nuesl 2.714,092 2,854,105 2,969.239 2,936,927 3,068,535 3106,048 3,349,733 3,493,319 3,622,236 3,766,697 3,916,924 4,053,799 4,195,438 4,321,301 4,450,940 6% n, cash over (under) munumum cash balance 120,015 772,127 (747.9421 (544.290) (741.47111 (435.523) (997472) (555696) (416.176) (193,165) 97.012 621,413 1669,700 Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 1MOI3008 ()by(yStudyll y1) 2009 Stc :ewer For Disc Jny City of tdina Utility Funds - Storm Sewer Fund Storm Sewer Revenue Increase 8.001. 8.001% 8.000/. 8.001/, 8.001/ 8.00% 8.001/. 8.00'/. 8.00' /. 8.001/. 8.00'/. B.00/. Other revenue increase 3.001/6 3.00'/. TOM. 3.00% 3.00°/. 3.00% 3.001A 3.001% 3.00% 3.00% 3.001% 3.000/. Investment Rate 3, W1. 3.000/. 3.(10'/. 3.00% 3.000/. 3.00.6 3.00% 3.001/. 3.001/6 3.001/. 3.001% 3.00°/ Expenditure increase 3.00% 3.001/. 3.001/. 3001/6 300% 3.00% 3.006A 3.001. 3.001/. 3.001/. 3.00'/. 3 00° 0 Per Financial Statements Projected 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 MIR 2019 Revenues Charges for services 735,222 824,068 1,242,082 1,894,086 1,800,000 1944 000 2,099,520 2,267,482 2,448,880 2,644,791 2,856,374 3,094.894 3,331,674 3,598,208 3,886,065 4,196,950 4 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Total operating revenues 735,222 824,068 1,242,082 1,894,086 1,800,000 1,944,000 2,099,520 2,267,482 2,448,880 2,644,791 2,856,374 3,084,884 3,331 674 3,598,208 3,886,065 4,196,950 S Expenses ` Admin 290,935 309,477 318,762 328,324 338,174 348,319 358,769 369,532 380,618 392,037 403,798 415,912 I'l Operating Expenses 204,074 208,211 195,1% 188,188 281,035 363,711 374,622 385,861 397,437 409,360 421,641 434,290 447,319 460,738 474,560 488,797 I1 Depreciation 272,265 291,568 334,398 364,074 348,750 416,375 469,007 535,955 608,000 650,534 730,582 815,454 905,390 1,000,643 1,101,477 1,208,169 I- Total operating expense 476,339 499,779 529,595 552,262 920,720 1,089,563 1,162,391 1,250,140 1,343,610 1,408,213 1,510,992 1,619,276 1,733,327 1,853,418 1,979,835 2,112,878 13 14 15 ,I Cash flow Operating income (loss) 258,883 324,289 712,488 1,341,824 879,280 854,437 937,129 1,017,341 1,105,270 1,236,578 1,345,382 1,465,608 1,598,348 1,744,791 1,906,230 2,084,072 34 Depreciation 272,265 291,568 334,398 364,074 348,750 416,375 469,007 535,955 608,000 650,534 730,582 815,454 905,390 1,000,643 1,101,477 1,208,169 Other changes? J2I1 36 Intergovernmental 4,246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- Interest income 0 0 0 0 83,396 103,434 109,645 114,511 113,507 107,377 107,809 99,183 83,217 63,117 35,672 17,242 38 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Disposal of assets 0 0 4,553 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Bond proceeds 3,625,043 2,343,710 1,900,000 1,600,000 2,100,000 2,200,000 950,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,600,000 2,800,000 41 Debt payments. 1999 bonds (120,605) (121,995) (123,145) (123,945) (124,545) (119,830) 42 Debt payments; 2007 bonds (504,474) (434,600) (432,000) (433,900) (435,200) (431,000) (431,300) (431,000) (430,100) (433,500) 4, Debt (P &I) -2008 Bonds Actual (176,512) (268,488) (267,713) (266,538) (264,956) (267,863) (269,881) (270,963) (271,363) (271,363) (270,631) 44 Debt (P &I) -2009 Bonds (5.00/6 for 10 years) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) (246,059) 45 Debt (P &l) - 2010 Bonds (525% for 10 years) (209,730) (209,730) (209,730) (209,730) (209,730) (209,730) (209,730) (209,730) (209,730) 4r, Debt(P &I) -2011 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (275,271) (275,271) (275,271) (275,271) (275,271) (275,271) (275,271) (275,271) 4- Debt (P &I) - 2012 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (288,379) (288,379) (288,379) (288,379) (288,379) (288,379) (288,379) 48' Debt (P &I) -2013 Bonds (5.51/. for 10 years) (126,034) (126,034) (126,034) (126,034) (126,034) (126,034) 4" Debt (P &I) - 2014 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (318,403) (318,403) (318,403) (318,403) (318,403) 50 Debt (P &I) -2015 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (318,403) (318,403) (318,403) (318,403) 51 Debt (P &I) - 2016 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (331,669) (331,669) (331,669) 52 Debt (P &I) -2017 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (331,669) (331,669) 5, Debt (P &I) - 2018 Bonds (5.51. for 10 years) (344,936) 54 Debt (P &I) - 2019 Bonds (5.5% for 10 yew) 5S 56 Capital (871,384) (1,028,970) (805,948) (2,427,125) (2,358,200) (2,336,256) (2,007,039) (2,643,880) (2,798,302) (1,214,706) (3,026,643) (3,147,709) (3,273,617) (3,404,562) (3,540,744) (3,682,374) S7 58Nkshflow •W7 207,047 132,1% (33,475) (jW 14$3 (jW (53.2.222)',005) $3) '� (634,OA 59 60 Beginning cash 2,779,871 3,447,788 3,654,835 3,817,031 3,783,557 3,579,233 3,593,619 3,306,112 2,773,890 2,103 986 1,189,063 574,717 !.I 6_ Ending cash F.. 2,779,871 3,447,788 3,654,935 3,817,031 3,783,557 3,579,233 3,593,619 3,306,112 2,773,890 2,103,886 1,189,063 574,717 0;9,3601 64 Quarterly Charge for Single Family Home 6.74 10.74 10.74 11.60 12.53 13.53 14.61 15.78 I Z04 18.41 1918 21.47 23.19 25.04 27.05 Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 1/16/2009 UtilityStudyl .14.2009 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V.B. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: January 20, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Action ® Motion. Donations ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. w91NA,r� Ok e �1 0 m • �N�oneoMTwv eae RESOLUTION NO. 2009-11 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to Edina Art Center: Ron & Sandy Clark $250.00 In memoriam of Louis Snyder & Thomas Wilson Purple Door Potters $160.00 Kenneth & Janet Wenzel $100.00 Elin Ohlsson & Alta Hanson $100.00 Robert & Dorothy 011mann $50.00 Donations to Edina Communications & Marketing Department: Edina Community Foundation $205.80 Donation to Edina Park Department: Friends of Edina Library $880.00 Dated: January 20, 2009 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Ina Hays $50.00 General Mills Foundation $30.00 Marty E Slater Stanger $10.00 Ronald & Kay Bach $50.00 Michael Anne deGrood Of the Kelm Foundation $1000.00 For Grandview Square Park STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 ^.r 1* To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor & City Council Debra Mangen City Clerk January 20, 2009 Set Hearing Date (02/17/09) REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V. C. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Motion adopting the attached resolution setting the hearing to consider the requested vacation. Info /Background: Part of the Interlachen Country Club Project involves a partial vacation request of Belmore Lane. The planning portion of this project will be heard before the City Council at their second meeting in February. Therefore, we suggest the Council also call the hearing for the considering the vacation at the same meeting. Statute requires two publications of the hearing notice for vacations which necessitates the month long lag between setting the date and actually holding the hearing. During that time staff will send notices to the neighbors and to the various utility companies. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -12 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BELMORE LANE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: It is hereby found and determined that the following described property should be considered for vacation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29 and 462.348, Subd. 7: 2. This Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 17th day of February, 2009, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks in the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the City, to post such notice, in at least three public and conspicuous places, as provided in Minnesota Statutes. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST W' STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on February 17, 2009, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for a utility easement to be vacated: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED: That part of Belmore Lane, originally dedicated as Seth Avenue in the recorded plat of Mendelssohn, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, which lies easterly of the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 1, Wilhoit's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -12 Page Two .BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dated: January 20, 2009 Passed and adopted this 20th day of January, 2009. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA' ) James B. Hovland, Mayor 1' CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk To: Mayor & City Council From: Susan Heiberg Date: January 20, 2009 Subject: SELECT DATE FOR 2009 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION KEYUK*1jKEC:UMMhN UAl'lUN Agenda Item #V. D. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion RECOMMENDATION: That the Council select one of the following dates for the 2009 Volunteer Recognition Reception (VRR) at Edinborough Park at 5:00 PM: • Wednesday, April 22nd Thursday, April 23 *d • Monday, April 27th NOTE: According to the City calendar, these choices do not conflict with evening advisory board or commission meetings. INFOBACKGROUND: • Spring break in 2009 is Monday, March 30th, through Friday, April 3rd. • Passover begins at sundown on Wednesday, April 81h, and continues through Thursday, April 16th; • Easter Sunday is April 12th. • The 2008 VRR was held on Tuesday, April 22nd. To: Mayor & City Council I From: Susan Heiberg Date: January 20, 2009 Subject: SELECT DATE FOR 2009 ANNUAL MEETING KEFUKT /KECUMMEN VATIUN Agenda Item #V. E. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends 1-1 To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance F] Discussion RECOMMENDATION: That the Council select one of the following dates for the 2009 Annual Meeting to be held at Centennial Lakes at 5:00 PM: • Monday, March 23rd • Wednesday, March 25th • Thursday, March 26th NOTE: According to the City calendar, these choices do not conflict with evening advisory board or commission meetings. INFO/BACKGROUND: • This is a dinner meeting to introduce incoming and retiring board and commission members. • The event is held at the Braemar Clubhouse every other year. In 2008, it was held there on Monday, March 17th. • Spring break in 2009 is Monday, March 30th, through Friday, April 3rd. • Passover begins at sundown on Wednesday, April 8th, and continues through Thursday, April 16th. • Easter Sunday is April 12th. `• i1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE 60* City Engineer Date: January 20, 2009 Subject: Hennepin County Electronic Proprietary Data Base (EPDB) Conditional Use License Agreement Recommendation: Agenda Item # Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action V.F. ❑ToHRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Re- approve Hennepin County's Conditional Use License Agreement #A00279 for electronic geographical digitized database. Adopt attached resolution 2009 -16, authorizing Manager to sign attached Agreement. Info /Background: The Conditional Use License Agreement is the standard document Hennepin County asks governmental entities to sign when the County provides the entity with an electronic geographical digitized database (computerized mapping information) of the City. The Agreement is to protect the County's proprietary interest and. removes the restriction on the City's use and /or distribution of hardcopies made from the County data. This renewal is for the extension of the 2000 EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement to December 31, 2009. G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRENG \HC EPDB Agreements \report to council - EPDB 2009.doc Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department 91 Survey Division - Suite A -703 612.348.3131 Phone Hennepin County Government Center 612.348.2837 Fax Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 www.co.hennepin.mn.us November 20, 2008 Wayne D. Houle cC���Er City of Edina ` "� 20p R 2 9 ' 4801 West 50th Street Agreement # A00279 jaN EpN Edina, MN 55424 -1394 G` 0.m6 \- Hennepin County desires to extend the above referenced EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement through December 31, 2009. If you as a Government Unit, Consultant/Third Party or Private Corporation, desire to extend the above- reference Agreement, the following requirements must be satisfied as they pertain to your entity. Please return the required information to Hennepin County, Attention: Robert Moulder (at the address stated at the top of this page). A.) GOVERNMENTAL UNIT MUST FURNISH TO THE COUNTY A COPY OF THE ACTION OF USER'S GOVERNING BODY AUTHORIZING THIS AGREEMENT EXTENSION. HOWEVER, IF AN OFFICIAL OF USER IS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR CHARTER TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT OF THIS NATURE THEN THIS ORIGINAL LETTER SIGNED BY SUCH OFFICIAL AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION MUST BE RETURNED TO THE COUNTY. NOTE: SUCH OFFICIAL MUST ATTACH TO THIS LETTER A COPY OF THEIR STATUTOR Y OR CHARTER A UTHORITY TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENTS. B.) CONSULTANT /THIRD PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE COUNTY A COPY OF AFFIRMATION BY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT THAT YOU WILL CONTINUE AS CONSULTANT AS STATED IN AGREEMENT NO. THROUGH THE YEAR 2009. IN ADDITION, CONSULTANT /THIRD PARTY MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. C.) PRIVATE CORPORATION MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. r As authorized by the Agreement and noting the above requirements, which pertain to you specifically, please indicate below your intention to extend or not to extend this agreement through the year 2009. Please return the originals of this page and the acknowledgement page and a copy of affirmation as Consultant/Third Party, as required, to the attention of Robert Moulder at the address shown at the top of page 1 as soon as possible. Please check (X) appropriate box. It IS our intention to extend this agreement through the year 2009. It is NOT our intention to extend this agreement through the year 2009. We no longer require this information. Signature: Date: Authorized Signature Title: If you have any questions about this notice, please call Robert Moulder at 612 - 348 -2618 for assistance. Sincerely, Richard P. Johnson County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 2009-16 RESOLUTION APPROVING HENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY DATA BASE (EPDB) CONDITIONAL USE LICENSE AGREEMENT City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. Hennepin County (the "County ") has developed an Electronic Proprietary Data Base (EPDB) (the "Data Base "), which the City desires to utilize. There has been prepared and presented to the City a Conditional Use License Agreement (the "Agreement ") between the City and County, pursuant to which the County grants the City a limited license to use the Data Base as provided in the Agreement and the City agrees to pay a fee for the use of the Data Base. Section 2. Approvals. The form of the Agreement is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized to enter into the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form presented to the City with such changes or modifications thereto as do not change the substance of the Agreement and are approved by the City Manager, such approval to be conclusively presumed by the execution and delivery of the Agreement by the City Manager. Attest: Dated: January 20, 2009 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952- 826 -0390 TTY 952- 826 -0379 n, REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V . G. Consent From: Cary Teague, City Planner Wayne Houle, City Engineer Information Only Date: January 20, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ . To HRA ® To Council Subject: Preliminary, Development Plan Agreement for the Action ® Motion Gateway Redevelopment Project Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommended Action. Approve the Preliminary Development Agreement between the City of Edina and Wayzata Properties for the Gateway Redevelopment project. Informatiori/Back o�,r und: The Preliminary Development Agreement list conditions of approval that were required by the City Council, and the responsible parties for the improvements required with each phase of development. (See attached agreement & exhibits.) January 20, 2009 (Reserved for recording information) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY 1. AGREEMENT, DATE, AND PARTIES. This PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY (this "Agreement ") is made as of , 2009, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City "), and WP DEVELOPMENT LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer "), each a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties." The Parties acknowledge that the provisions of this Agreement constitute good and valuable mutual consideration. 2. DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION 2.1 Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms will have the followinq meanings. A. Agreement. "Agreement" means this Preliminary Development Plan Agreement For Edina Gateway, including the following exhibits attached to -1- this Agreement and hereby made a part of it. Exhibit A: Legal Description of Subject Propertv Exhibit B: Depiction of Subject Propert v Exhibit C: Summary Traffic Mitigation Plan Exhibit D: Traffic Improvements— Developer Responsibility Exhibit E: Traffic Improvements — Shared Responsibility Exhibit F: Public Improvements — Developer Responsibility — Tower Parcel Exhibit G: Public Improvements — Developer Responsibility — Quads Parcel Exhibit H: Public Improvements — City Responsibility B. Burgundy Place. "Burgundy Place" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.3. C. City. "City" carries the meaning given it in Section 1. D. Default. "Default" carries the meaning given it in Section 14. E. Developer. "Developer" carries the meaning given it in Section 1. F. Notice /Notices. "Notice" and "Notices" carry the meaning given them in Section 15.1. G. Preliminary Development Plan. "Preliminary Development Plan" carries the meaning given it in Section 8.1. H. Party /Parties. "Party" and Parties" carry the meaning given them in Section 1. L Phase 1. "Phase 1" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.3. J. Phase 2. "Phase 2" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.3. K. Phase 3. "Phase 3" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.3: L. Phase 4. "Phase 4" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.3. M. Phase 5. "Phase 5" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.3. -2- �f "f r N. Project "Project" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.3. O. Quads Parcel. "Quads Parcel" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.2. P. Subject Property. "Subject Property" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.1. Q. Tower Parcel. "Tower Parcel" carries the meaning given it in Section 3.2. R. Traffic Mitigation Plan. "Traffic Mitigation Plan carries the meaning given it in Section 8.2. S. Walsh Title Parcel. "Walsh Title Parcel" carries the meaning given it in Section 11.9. 2.2 Rules Of Construction A. Sections And Exhibits. All references in this Agreement to Sections and Exhibits refer to Sections and Exhibits of this Agreement, except as otherwise specifically stated in this Agreement. B. Drafter's Identity Irrelevant The Parties and their attorneys have fully participated in negotiating and drafting this Agreement, Thus, the rule of strict construction does not apply to this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement will be construed for or against, or be interpreted to the advantage or disadvantage of, a Party by any court or other governmental or judicial authority because the Party structured or dictated the provision or is deemed to have done so. C. Gender /Singular & Plural. All references in this Agreement to one gender will include both genders. Any reference to the singular will include the plural where appropriate, and vice versa. D. Governing Law. This Agreement will be construed and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. E. Headings Of Sections. All Section headings are for reference purposes and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement. F. Words And Phrases. The following words and phrases will have the -3- following meanings: (1) "include" will mean "include without limitation;" (2) "including" will mean "including but not limited to;" (3) "provisions" will mean "agreements, conditions, duties, grants, indemnities, immunities, obligations, privileges, provisions, releases, representations, rights, terms, and warranties." 3. RECITALS 3.1 The Developer owns 43 acres of property along West 77th Street in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, including all of the area known as Pentagon Park (the "Subject Property "). The Subject Property is legally described on Exhibit A: Legal Description of Subject Propert y and is depicted on Exhibit B: Depiction of Subject Propert y: 3.2 The Subject Property is divided into two main parcels — the "Tower Parcel" that lies south of West 77th Street and is generally bounded by West 77th Street on the north, Computer Avenue on the east, Viking Drive on the and private property on the south, and Normandale Road and private property on the west; and the "Quads Parcel" that lies north of West 77th Street and is generally bounded by West 77th Street on the south, the 4700 West 77th Street property on the west, the Fred Richards Golf Course on the north, and Parklawn Avenue on the east. 3.3 The Subject Property is largely developed, but the Developer proposes to redevelop it with a mix of hotel, office, and senior residential and assisted living uses, collectively called Edina Gateway (the "Project "). The Developer expects to build the Project in five phases: Phase 1 — a hotel on the Tower Parcel ( "Phase 1 "); Phase 2 — independent, assisted, and townhome living on the Quads Parcel ( "Phase 2 "); Phase 3 — office building on the Tower Parcel and ndependent, assisted, and townhome Iffiving on the Quads Pareel ("Phase ; Phase 4 — independent and townhome living on the Quads Parcel ( "Phase 4 "); Phase 5 — assisted living on the Quads Parcel and second office building on the 10 , I . I 1 Tower Parcel ( "Phase 5 "). The residential redevelopment project at 4930 West 77th Street ( "Burgundy Place ") was approved earlier by the City and is not a part of the Project or the phases described above. 3.4 On January 31, 2008, the Developer submitted to the City its Edina Gateway, Pentagon Park Redevelopment — Overall Development Plan, which included several plan sets, reports, and specifications for the Project, and requested approvals for changes in the City's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinances. Subsequently, additional materials were submitted, and City staff and various City committees and commissions reviewed the submission and made recommendations for changes and limiting conditions. 3.5 On March 18, 2008, the Edina City Council approved the Project subject to a number of conditions. One condition required the preparation and execution of this Agreement. 3.6 The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to memorialize the Edina City Council approval and the conditions that will guide the Project. 4. PROJECT APPROVAL. The City has specifically approved: 4.1 A Guide Plan Amendment changing the Subject Property from Office to Mixed Use Residential; 4.2 A rezoning of the Subject Property to Mixed Development District — 6; and 4.3 Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan, subject to conditions that are included as provisions of this Agreement. 5. RIGHT TO PROCEED AND FURTHER APPROVALS. The Developer may apply for other needed City approvals for the Project, including final site plan approvals for each Project phase, subdivision approvals, preliminary and final plats, and final may proceed, a preliminary plat of the entire Project must be approved by the Edina City Council. Each phase subsequent to Phase 1 must receive a separate final plat -5- r approval before proceeding. Also, separate Final Development Agreements must be entered into between the Developer and the City for each Project phase. Future City approvals may impose standards and requirements that vary from or are in addition to the terms of this Agreement. Unless otherwise agreed to by the City and Developer, the City's Preliminary Development Plan approval and this Agreement will only apply to Project Phases for which construction has commenced before January 1, 2018. 6. APPROVAL FOR PHASING CHANGES. The Developer may need to change the Project phasing as described in Section 3.3. For example, if the Phase 1 hotel encounters financing difficulties, Phase 2 housing development may precede the hotel. Or if office space demand does not occur as expected, Phase 4 senior housing development might occur before the office building now scheduled in Phase 3. Any change in phasing must be approved by the City Council by amendment to this Agreement and by approval of a Final Development Plan for the specific phase that reflects the changes. 7. COMPLIANCE WITH OFFICIAL CONTROLS. The Project must be developed in compliance with the City's official controls as amended from time to time. However, upon preliminary plat approval and each final plat approval, the Developer will be protected against compliance with newly adopted City official controls in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. 3c. 8. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Project will be developed consistent with the following plans and documents. 8.1 Preliminary Development Plan. The following plans submitted by the Developer and approved by the Edina City Council which collectively constitute the "Preliminary Development Plan." Title Sheet Project Narrative Memo A -Info Landscape Schedule L -info Location Plan S -1 Title I Sheet Site Plan — Existing Structures S -2.E Site Plan — Proposed Development Complete S -2.P Site Plan — Phase 1 Development S -2.1 Site Plan — Phase 2 Development S -2.2 Site Plan — Phase 3 Development S -2.3 Site Plan — Phase 4 Development S -2.4 Site Plan — Phase 5 Development S -2.5 Project Phasing Chart S -P Landscape Plan — Illustrative Full Site L -1 Landscape Plan — Illustrative Tower L -2 Landscape Plan — Illustrative Quads West L -3 Landscape Plan — Illustrative Quads East L -4 Landscape Plan Detail Pedestrian Path L -5 Site Plan Tower S -3 Site Plan Quads West S -4 Site Plan Quads East S -5 Site Plan Tower — Setbacks S -3.sb Site Plan Quads West — Setbacks S -4.sb Site Plan Quads East — Setbacks S -5.sb Site Plan Tower S -6a Site Plan - Quads S -6b Site Section — Towers N/S S -7 Site Section — Towers N/S S -8 Site Section — Towers EM S -9 Site Section — Towers EM S -10 Site Section — Quads N/S S -11 Site Section — Quads N/S S -12 Stormwater Movement Section — Towers S -13 Stormwater Movement Section —Quads S -14 Shadow Study Towers June A -1 Shadow Study Quads June A -4 Shadow Study Towers Mar /Sept A -2 Shadow Study Quads Mar /Sept A -5 Shadow Study Towers Dec A -3 Shadow Study Quads Dec A -6 3D Building Illustration A -7 -7- Title Sheet 3D Building Illustration A -8 3D Building Illustration A -9 3D Building Illustration A -10 Pentagon Park — Existing Photographs R -1 Pentagon Park — Existing Building Data R -2 Survey — Full Site R -3 Survey — Tower R -4 Survey — Quads West R -5 Survey — Quads East R -6 Site Plan — Burgundy Place R -7 Survey — Walsh Title R -8 Concept Preliminary Plat R -9r dated 3/13/08 Sheet Index C -1 Overall Existing Plan C -2 Overall Phasing Plan C -3 Existing Tower Phase 1 Demolition Plan C -4 Tower Phase 1 Paving / Utility Plan C -5 Tower Phase 1 Grading / Storm Water Mgmt. Plan C -6 Existing Tower Phase 3 Demolition Plan C -7 Tower Phase 3 Paving / Utility Plan C -8 Tower Phase 3 Grading / Storm Water Mgmt. Plan C -9 Existing Tower Phase 5 Demolition Plan C -10 Tower Phase 5 Paving / Utility Plan C -11 Tower Phase 5 Grading / Storm Water Mgmt. Plan C -12 Existing Quads Phase 2 Demolition Plan C -13 Quads Phase 2 Paving / Utility Plan C -14 Quads Phase 2 Grading and Storm Water Mgmt. Plan C -15 Existing Quads Phase 3 Demolition Plan C -16 Quads Phase 3 Paving / Utility Plan C -17 Quads Phase 3 Grading and Storm Water Mgmt. Plan C -18 Existing Quads Phase 4 Demolition Plan C -19 Quads Phase 4 Paving / Utility Plan C-20 Quads Phase 4 Grading and Storm Water Mgmt. Plan C -21 Existing Quads Phase 5 Demolition Plan C -22 Quads Phase 5 Paving / Utility Plan C -23 In , j I Title Sheet Quads Phase 5 Grading and Storm Water Mgmt. Plan C -24 Stormwater Management Details C -25 Site Plan — Tower (full size 30 x 42 sheet) S -6a Site Plan — Quads (full size 30 x 42 sheet) S -6b Landscape Plan — Illustrative Full Site (full size 30 x 42 sheet) L -1 Engineering Documents (full size 30 x 42 sheet) C -1 to C -25 Walsh Title Survey (full size 30 x 42 sheet) None Burgundy Place Site Plan (full size 30 x 42 sheet) C102 8.2 Traffic Mitigation Plan. The Summary Traffic Mitigation Plan — 2121108, prepared by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. ( "Traffic Mitigation Plan "), which is attached as Exhibit C: Summary Traffic Mitigation Plan. 8.3 Gateway Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review. The Gateway Area Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review and Final Mitigation Plan adopted by the Edina City Council on November 5, 2007. 8.4 Agreement To Control. If the written terms of this Agreement vary from the plans or documents, the written terms of this Agreement will control. 9. TRAFFIC MITIGATION 9.1 Developer's Full Responsibility. The Developer must construct consistent with plans approved by the City, and must pay 100% of the costs for, the following traffic mitigation: A. Phase 1— Tower Parcel. At the north entrance to the proposed hotel, the entrance will be a right -in / right -out entrance only with a "pork- chop" island that prohibits left turns. See Exhibit D at No. 1. B. Phase 1 —Quads Parcels. None. D. Phase 3 — Tower Parcel (1) At the signalized intersection of Industrial Boulevard, Trunk Highway w L 1 100 South Bound Ramps, and Normandale Road, change the second north bound lane on Normandale Road from through only to shared through / right -turn. See Exhibit D at No. 2. (2) At the intersection of Viking Drive and the Tower Parcel south access road, reconstruct the median in Viking Drive to create a full access intersection. See Exhibit D at No. 3. E. Phase 4. None. F. Phase 5. None. 9.2 Developer And City's Shared Responsibility. The Developer must construct consistent with plans approved by the City, and must share with the City in paying the costs as specified below, for the following traffic mitigation. A. Phase 1. None. B. Phase 2. None. C. Phase 3 — Tower Parcel (1) At the signalized intersection of West 77th Street, Trunk Highway 100 North Bound Ramps, and Normandale Road, dedicate right -of -way and sidewalk and utility easements from the Tower Parcel sufficient to add a second west bound right -turn lane on West 77th Street and a receiving lane on the Trunk Highway 100 North Bound On -ramp. See Exhibit E at No. 4.. If the intersection project is accelerated prior to this phase, the Developer will dedicate the required right -of -way when required for the intersection project at no charge to the City. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. (2) At the signalized intersection of West'77th Street, Trunk Highway 100 North Bound Ramps, and Normandale Road, add a second west bound right -turn lane on West 77th Street, add a second receiving lane to the Trunk Highway 100 (North Roa�n.d On -ramp and change - the -sP�nd 1 a� ��c Highway vv � � - pr north bound lane on Normandale Road from a left -turn only to shared through / left turn. See Exhibit E at No. 5. The Developer will pay -10- 45..1 % of the project costs for this improvement. The City will pay all other project costs for this improvement. D. Phase 3 — Quads Parcel. At the signalized intersection of West 77th Street, Minnesota Drive, and Johnson Avenue, add a second south bound left -turn lane on West 77th Street. See Exhibit E at No. 6. The Developer will pay 15.1 % of the project costs for this improvement. The City will pay all other project costs for this improvement. E. Phase 4. None. F. Phase 5 — Tower Parcel. None. G. Phase 5 — Quads Parcel. Realign West 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue to create a sweeping curve for east /west movement. See Exhibit E at No. 7. As the Developer's cost of this mitigation, the Developer must dedicate a right -of -way for the sweeping curve from the Quads Parcel, and the area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. The City will pay all other realignment costs. 9.3 City To Consider Special Assessments. As each. phase is approved, the Developer may request that traffic mitigation costs to be paid by Developer for that phase be specially assessed against the Subject Property or some portion of it, and the City will consider, but is not obligated to approve, the request. If a traffic mitigation measure is assessed, the work must be a public project constructed.by the City. 10. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 10.1 Developer's Full Responsibility. The Developer must construct consistent with plans approved by the City, and must pay 100% of the costs for, the following public improvements: A. Phase 1— Tower Parcel (1) Sidewalk along the east side of Normandale Road from the hotel to the intersection of Normandale Road, West 77th Street, and the Trunk -11- Highway 100 North Bound Ramps as show on Exhibit F, including dedication of a sidewalk easement. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. (2) Sanitary sewer (8 -inch) from Viking Drive to the hotel as shown on Exhibit F. (3) Water main (8 -inch) from Viking Drive to the hotel as shown on Exhibit F B. Phase 1— Quads Parcel. None. C. Phase 2 — Towers Parcel. None. D. Phase 2 — Quads Parcel (1) Sidewalk along West 77th Street as shown on Exhibit G, including dedication of a sidewalk easement. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. (2) Sanitary sewer (12 -inch and .8 -inch) through the phase to Parklawn Avenue as shown on Exhibit G. (3) Water main (8 -inch) through the phase from the Fred Richards Golf Course to West 77th Street as shown on Exhibit G. E. Phase 3 — Tower Parcel (1) Sidewalk along both West 77th Street and Viking Drive as shown on Exhibit F, including dedication of sidewalk easements. The areas of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. (2) Sanitary sewer (8 -inch) from the office building to Viking Drive as shown on Exhibit F. (3) Water main (8 -inch) from the water main at Burgundy Place across West 77th Street, through the Tower Parcel to Viking Drive and within the Tower Parcel parallel to Viking Drive, all as shown on Exhibit F. F. Phase 3 — Quads Parcel (1) Sidewalk along West 77th Street as shown on Exhibit G, including dedication of a sidewalk easement. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. -12- (2) Sanitary sewer (8 -inch) through the phase as shown on Exhibit G. (3) Water main (8 -inch) through the phase as shown on Exhibit G. G. Phase 4 — Tower Parcel. Sidewalk along West 77th Street from the Burgundy Place entrance along the northerly boulevard of the Walsh Title property to the existing sidewalk at the intersection of Computer Avenue and West 77th Street as shown on Exhibit F, including dedication of a sidewalk easement. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. H. Phase 4 — Quads Parcel (1) Sidewalk along West 77th Street as shown on Exhibit G, including dedication of a sidewalk easement. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. (2) Sanitary sewer (8 -inch) through the phase as shown on Exhibit G. (3) Water main (8- inch) through the phase as show on Exhibit G. 1. Phase 5 — Tower Parcel (1) Sidewalk along West 77th Street, Computer Avenue, and Viking Drive as shown on Exhibit F, including dedication of a sidewalk easement. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. (2) If required to serve the Project, replace the existing sanitary sewer in Computer Avenue from West 77th Street to Viking Drive as shown on Exhibit F using pipe bursting or other method to avoid street reconstruction. J. Phase 5 — Quads Parcel. Sidewalk along West 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue as shown on Exhibit G, including dedication of a sidewalk easement. The area of this dedication will be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 10.2 City's Full Responsibility. The City must construct, and must pay 100% of the costs for, the following public improvements: -13- A. Phase 1. None. B. Phase 2 — Tower Parcel. None. C. Phase 2 — Quads Parcel. Water main (12 -inch) from the northerly boundary of the Quads Parcel to Water Treatment Plant No. 4. in the Fred Richards Golf Course as shown on Exhibit H. D. Phase 3 — Tower Parcel (1) Water main (8 -inch) from the water main in West 77th Street west to the water main through West 77th Street and the Tower Parcel as shown on Exhibit H. (2) Water service from the intersection of Computer Avenue and Viking Drive, north on Computer Avenue and east on West 77th Street to serve Seagate Corporation as shown on Exhibit H. E. Phase 3 — Quads Parcels. None. F. Phase 4 — Towers Parcel. None. G. Phase 4;— Quads Parcel. Water main (8 -inch) from the westerly boundary of the Quads Parcel to the Burgundy Place water main as shown on Exhibit H. H. Phase 5. None. 10.3 Metropolitan Council Responsibility. Before Phase 5 activities on the Tower Parcel may proceed, upgrades to an existing sanitary sewer interceptor and existing sanitary lift station must be designed, constructed, and paid for by the Metropolitan Council. Both upgrades must be of a size and capacity to adequately serve the Project. 10.4 No Public Storm Sewer Improvements. No public storm sewer improvements are required for the Project based on applicable 2008 storm 10.5 City To Consider Special Assessments. As each phase is approved, the Developer may request that public.improvement costs to be paid by Developer -14- a I. t for that phase be specially assessed against the Subject Property or some portion of it, and the City will consider, but is not obligated to approve, the request. If a public improvement is assessed, the work must be a public project constructed by the City. 11. OTHER SPECIFIC PROJECT CONDITIONS. Final site plan approvals and plat approvals are subject to the following conditions. 11.1 Sustainable Design. The design and construction of the entire Project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the Developer's narrative. To the extent possible, LEED standards and principles will be used for the hotel and housing phases of this Project. 11.2 Trail And Sidewalk Connections. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated, and public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 11.3 Easternmost West 77th Street Entrance. The easternmost entrance off of West 77th Street into the Quads Parcel must be designed as a shared entrance with the Fred Richards Golf Course. 11.4 Appearance Of Four -Story Buildings Facing West 77th Street. The four - story senior independent buildings that face West 77th Street must be designed so as not to appear as the back side of buildings. 11.5 Fire Sprinkler Systems Required. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshall. 11.6 Height Limitations A. Buildings at Burgundy Place will be limited to 4 stories or 50 feet, whichever would be less, and must maintain a 50 -foot setback from the rear lot line, all as previously approved by the City. B. With the exception of the buildings at 4930 West 77th Street, future buildings north of West 77th Street development will be limited to 4 stories or 58 feet in height. -15- } 11 11.7 Limits On Certain Uses. Convenience gasoline stations and drive - through windows are prohibited on the north side of West 77th Street. 11.8 Future West 77th Street Improvements. The City may assess the Tower Parcel and the Quads Parcel each property's respective share for future West 77th Street upgrades, except that as to the realignment of West 77th Street described in Section 9.2G, the cost allocation in that Section will control. 11.9 Senior Housing Required. With the exception of Burgundy Place and the Subject Property parcel currently improved with the Walsh Title Building ( "Walsh Title Parcel "), the housing within the Project must be senior housing. If the Developer proposes redevelopment of the Walsh Title Parcel, that proposal must be approved by the City Council by amendment to this Agreement and by approval of a Final Development Plan for the proposed redevelopment. 11.10 Building Senior Housing With Non- residential Uses. Following completion of the proposed hotel, a large percentage of senor housing must be built prior to or along with non - residential uses. 11.11 Bike And Bus Circulation. Bike and bus traffic circulation must be carefully considered throughout the development 11.12 Bike Trail On West Side Of Lake Edina. If a bike trail running north from 4930 West 77th Street along the west side of Lake Edina is constructed before the completion of Phase 4, the Developer will contribute $25,000 to the construction costs of that trail with adjustment for inflation or deflation calculated by using the difference in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index between 2008 and the year in which the City accepts the bid for the trail. The trail, if constructed, will be considered part of the first phase of development occurring north of West 77th Street. -- 11.13 Maximum Use Of Pathway And Bikeways. Thorn M411 be - maximum. utilization of pathways and bikeways throughout the Overall Development Plan. -16- 12. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS 12.1 Project Costs. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement, the Developer will pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with Project development, including: watershed district charges; legal, planning, engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Project and the preparation of this Agreement; review of construction plans and documents, and expenses incurred in connection with monitoring and inspecting development of the Project. 12.2 Enforcement Costs. The Developer will reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement including engineering and attorneys' fees. 12.3 Payment Requirements. The Developer will pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within 30 days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may declare the Developer in Default under Section 14 and exercise the remedies provided in that Section. Bills not paid within 30 days will accrue interest at the rate of 18% per year. 12.4 Connection Charges. Buildings on the Subject Property developed in accordance with this Agreement are exempt from the payment of City sewer and water connection charges but must pay Metropolitan Council Environmental Services sewer availability charges. 13. INDEMNITY. The Developer will hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Project approval and development. The Developer will indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. 14. DEFAULT. If a Party defaults in any of its respective obligations under this Agreement (a "Default "), a non - defaulting Party must give the defaulting Party notice of a Default specifying the nature of the Default. If within ten days after notice, the defaulting Party -17- has not cured the Default, a non - defaulting Party may, at its election, cure the Default on behalf of the defaulting Party or may use any remedy at law or equity, including injunctive relief and specific performance, to enforce the terms of this Agreement. The ten -day cure period does not apply (a) in the case of an emergency that requires an immediate cure, or (b) where a Default cannot be cured within ten days and the defaulting Party begins to cure the Default within the ten -day period and diligently prosecutes the same thereafter. No consent to or waiver of a Default, express or implied, by any Party may be deemed .or construed to be a consent to or waiver of the same or any other Default by the defaulting Party or any other Party. Failure on the part of any Party to complain about or give notice of a Default, irrespective of how long such failure continues, does not constitute a waiver by such Party of its rights.under this Agreement. 15. NOTICE 15.1 Written Notice Required. Any notice, demand, or request that is permitted, required, or desired to be given in connection with this Agreement (individually a "Notice" and collectively "Notices ") must be given in writing and directed to Developer or the City, as the case may be, as follows: If to Developer: WP Development LLC Attn: Chris Hickok, Vice President 294 East Grove Lane, Suite 100 Wayzata, MN 55391 If to the City: With a copy to The City of Edina Attn: City Manger 4801 West 50TH Street Edina, MN 55424 The City of Edina Attn: City Planner 4801 West 50TH Street Edina, MN 55424 And with a copy to: The City of Edina . Attn: City Engineer 5 . 4801 West 50TH Street Edina, MN 55424 15.2 How Notices May Be Delivered. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, Notices may be: A. Delivered personally; B. Sent by telephone facsimile and confirmed by delivering an original copy of the notice on the same day to a nationally recognized overnight courier for delivery to the addressee on the next business day; C. Sent by nationally recognized overnight courier; or D. Sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. 15.3 When Notices Are Effective. Notices are effective: A. On receipt if delivered personally; B. On receipt if sent by telephone facsimile and confirmed as required in Section 15.2; C. On the next business day if sent by overnight.,courier; or D. On the date shown on the receipt if mailed, unless delivery is refused or delayed by the addressee, in which event they are deemed delivered on the third business day following deposit in the U.S. Mail. 15.4 Changing Notice. Each party has the right to change its address to any other address in the United States of America by giving ten days prior notice thereof in accordance with this Section 15. 16. MISCELLANEOUS 16.1 Agreement To Run With Land. This Agreement will be recorded against the title to the Subject Property and will run with the land. 16.2 Amendment And Waiver. The Parties may by mutual written agreement amend this Agreement in any respect. No term of this Agreement is waived -19- unless done so in writing by the Party against whom the waiver is asserted. 16.3 Compliance Representation. The Developer represents to the.City that the Project complies with all City, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Project does not comply, the City may declare the Developer in Default under Section 14 and exercise the remedies provided in that Section. 16.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which is deemed an original but all of which constitute one and the same instrument. 16.5 No Partnership Or Joint Venture. No express or implied provision of this Agreement constitutes the parties as partners or joint venturers. 16.6 No Public Rights. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, the public has no rights under this Agreement, including any right to enforce this Agreement or to enter upon or use the Subject Property. 16.7 No Third -Party Beneficiaries. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, no rights, privileges, or immunities,of any Party under this Agree ment,inure to the benefit of any third -party, nor is any third -party a beneficiary of any provision contained in this Agreement. 17.. EXECUTION. Authorized representatives of the Parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the date in Section 1. (SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW) -20- , 4, . f CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY SIGNATURE PAGE FOR CITY OF EDINA James Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) And: Debra Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2009, by James Hovland and by Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC -21- PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY SIGNATURE PAGE FOR WP DEVELOPMENT LLC DEVELOPER: WP DEVELOPMENT LLC Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2009, by liability company, on its behalf. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 RNK:srn fb.us.3004727.12 the of WP Development LLC, a Minnesota limited -22- I . A A Exhibit A: Legal Description of Subject Property Parcel 1 - Quads - Proposed Block 1 ,Tracts A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H,.and I, Registered Land'Survey No. 1218,, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2 - Towers - Proposed Block 2 All of the following described land: Those parts of Tracts A and B lying Southerly of the following described line: Beginning at.a point on the West line of said Tract B distant 220 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; thence run Northeasterly to a point on the North line of said Tract B distant 170 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence run Northeasterly to a point on the East line of said Tract A distant 40 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof and there terminating, Tract C, Tracts E and F, except those parts thereof lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of Tract A, distant 40 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence run Northeasterly to a point distant 120 feet West and 32 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Tract E; thence run Easterly parallel with the North line of said Tract E for 30 feet; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for 12 feet; thence run Easterly and Southeasterly parallel with.the Northerly and Northeasterly lines of said Tracts E and F to its intersection with the following described line: Beginning at a point on the'Southwesterly line of Tract S distant 105 feet Southeasterly of the West line of said Tract S (when measured along said Southwesterly line); thence run Southwesterly at right angles to said Southwesterly line for 100 feet and there terminating. Tract G, Tract H, and hat part of ract U, lying East of e West 2bU feet thereof; All in Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o 2 3 i In TU vvT n LOT OT 2 7 y I' �T� DRI VE a X X a 2 W 76TH ST �`i LLLLLLLLLLLii I,L q Ll L LI `, Ll \ (.G2 LO - , )mil Li T ; ca � �I ELF 3Ic> L.. V U Q - �� pA I L Y p L L LOT 2 = R T 7 7F T LLLLL L LLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLL L LLLLL LLLLLLLILL WEST 77TH STREET cc �, ✓ .-. TIT � �L T [� III- /I(� �� ♦1 � ` " � C= o j m .s� rr� � w« ...� . �.. •- -tea m.. ue..� ... s _�� �rr AMP Er u.nunr ..4,1atlu ,e m fru.mnr uw b �m N� m uur ,unY.np �1 ••�• � c a L .. n w �...mb.. l.�a >w�, w. nn w..�m w.. ° �rN 4ru.9 ., a YbN rvwre k °ww.M u . 1'� °lu�p Y r w..puw u.1Ya [n, 4m4 rrrr [�.�..Iu.u.r. lu w ,uwn /.wiry N NO SC/ E]}B/iB ri i - xhibit C: Summary Traffic Mitigation Plan ;w, * ` �' •,-:. p!, Jai^ o i , 2 4a ..r S'" -� vitSr�97MSr s '' y. '� _P�"f • ,� r.. .a r� SUMMARY TRA PENTAGON PA ..,.... rm R P. , Wz- "-- ►v. C MITIGATION PLAN - 2121108 REDEVELOPMENT OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY - E*act financial arrangement for t to negotiation in the 9 T 14 AI w ANOd*& Inc. A 4IIP PC Imp low 3 al I. z ILI % LEGEND IF PHASE I IMPROVEMEN _S but (NONE) PHASE 11 IMPROVEMENTS PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS (NONE) PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS L (NONE) PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REFERENCE NUMBER DRAWING NAME EXHIBIT D SIGNED By DiL Kimley-Horn PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY AWN BY. DJI and Associates, Inc. ECKED BY: ojc wp TE. "p./— — — I WI,.... P—p ....... It. DJECT W 16051=1.3.&W — �t 1" .11, — lll% TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS - DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITY ar °- r _ 00 '%ad" I+/b�.ar • ' I' 1L 404 4 r . Y . • . �,. � :>r �I. _N ,� sow �,♦16.- = "..ai - " "#!� w�.' � °� �A� r 'a'L515"'Y} Ow I fw r LEGEND �" ti ' T �' V'•, _ (NONE) PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS t. - _ �'• - 7%r.. (NONE) PHASE 11IMPROVEMENTS PHASE If IMPROVEMENTS (NO E) PHASE IV IMPROVEMEN IS PHASE V IMPROVEMEN S fw.• ` `� -�,� ,' _ ,:�: 6 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REFERENCE NUMBER e '� -y ROW ACOUISITION (PHASE III) g - _ _4' _ a� �• ® ROW ACOUISITION (PHASE V) S _ DRAWNC NAME EXHIB'T EXHIBIT E DESIGNED BY: DJL Kimley -Horn �jj� PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY DRAWN BY, DJL and Associates, Inc. Wyj--� S CHECKED BY: DJC >.e. j DALE: 1]/.6 /x006 rt •rw u a• a w lY11i =s„ Wq.au P,.p,,t,,,.LLC E7 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS - SHARED RESPONSIBILITY PROJECT N0. 1605IM1.3.600 — II W. 77TH STREET \\ i I _ I _11_ I I_- If I D 1 I I I I I I I ` \ � ,/ ��^�` / I �y I �I \ _, F_.� � / 1 L� I \ .- � � I ' ��•' �'� �'��' , LEGEND ' W l J I �� - -- 1�-- ,�.---- - - - - -- ' PHASE I IM ROVEMENTS I---- - -__ -- ' L - - - - -J I r r -- ------ - - - - -, II a I I IIL -- - I 11 I l I Lr__ - -� I I I I I I (NONE) PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS o r' -- I I I 11 I 1 Z I i PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS r___ PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS PHASE V IM ROVEMENTS PROPOSED WATER I - L-- -- -- ---- - -- - -- --- - J 1 - - - - - - - - - - ( I � I 1 I ► PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED IDEWALK ' I - --- - ------ ' �__----- - ----------- ' KING DRIVE I - - -- -- - -- - --- - - ---- I � DRAWING NAME EXHIBIT f�..'.f..'I.O��i.i.l6 u � _❑ aid A dit, Inc. tiro --� \V�V /1�..J PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY EXHIBIT C r DESIGNED BY: DJL DRAWN BY: DJL CHECKED F. OJC DATE: $6s ir ;w-nn ue6 wwuR K of aae W.Y.— Propere LLC. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITY -TOWER PARCEL PRD.ECT ND 1605110113.600 LEGEND (NONE) PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS Irrrr�r PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS FT- PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS \ —I 1— PROPOSED WATER _ I; ` -� ♦�l ' {r--- ° -- -- - - °--- i I �-- -� PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER u ' nl'-I' 1 -_ -- - -- - - -v - -- --- �- -'J -------- - - - - -- PROPOSED SIDEWALK � I --------------- ------------------------ ------ 1 I , ,1l1 1 Il I lu 1 ♦ P II N ♦ i j P l I II I I �rr1 11 r ry � F I'l ,1r� ____�' ___ -__ I '� ♦� y. ... t_ �_� � i �- � � �_Y_� • � � III I "I 111 L J` -J'L_, I ' 1 x i` II ] j j E 1 !'I �L' III r- 4f JJ III Ul II L II-IF ,I Np 1 r II II II 1 F - - I1_ II 11 I 1 IJJIJ - II I L'll7 ll, I1� I 1 III r� Jli L_ 1 S cIt FI , t -= AL-1- P I 4- I _sA 11 {ti s.il -_� I J L Y 1„ E r, 1 I 1 I I % I 1 �IIL_llll L3FTZ_� LJ' -- ____�{I IL _ ___ ?__ - - - -� -` - - -- -_ - _ -____ - __- ---- - - - - -- - ^�L� ilryi c _ I I I L__a�rs i �� I I I J J _ ___ J I I L- - - - - -J I ii IIII i I I r__iJ it Lul ___, - _�__ 1 u I �Li--- 1-------- -1- - -- r ------- 7� _ -_lr - Z___s Ir _____ _— _______ I mss_ _ _______ __ _ ____ y��____� �_______ - yr ♦ DRAWWD NAME EXHIBIT c �B Horn .�w� IIIIIIIIIII' wd ice{ Int PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY EXHIBIT DESIGNED BV DJI DRAWN BY, DJL CHECKED BY: DJC DATE. s�IP�sooe r Iu�mn ANe e[ e� NA N..ena {.. alr w b YIl;reata Properria {. LL[ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITY -QUADS PARCEL PRO,ECT Na IPOSI]p11.I'M - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'Al ------------- --------- Je 0 Z�i4w-in jd:ir�, L -------- - - L---- ___'_• -- ----- I Lj— 0 A 4 n 0 4 -------- it N _ —T7 ----------- - - - - - - - - - - - --- ----- -- r 0 — ------ --- LEGEND L (NONE) PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 11IMPROVEMENTS VJ ---- 4 ----- PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS (NONE) PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WATER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER ------------------ PROPOSED SIDEWALK DRAWING NAME EXHIBIT H Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, wp PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR EDINA GATEWAY E-IA17 H DESIGNED By.. DIL DRAWN Y-. DA CHECKED BY. Dic DATE. 12/18/21— ;t:: I-W) =1. W�..0 P—p-- LLC PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS -CITY RESPONSIBILITY PR&ECY .0, 160512011,3600 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY L.. .iNA 1 /b,....,,9 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 1 117/2009 - 118/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318035 1/712009 123900 WELCHLIN COMMUNICATION STRATEG 2,000.00 SEMINAR PRESENTATION 202967 010209 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . COMMUNICATIONS 2,000.00 318036 1/812009 100613 AAA 4,338.39 PLATES/TAX 25.349 202848 123008 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION >GEN 4,338.39 PLATES/TAX 25.351 202848 123008 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8,676.78 318037 1/812009 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 767.58 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001552 202946 0119060 -iN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 767.58 318038 1/8/2009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 98.72 202597 509888 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 44.08 202598 509889 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 19.04 202599 0312095 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 88.92 202747 502525 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 53.12 202748 509890 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 43.00 202749 509588 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 18.56 202750 0312033 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 70.16 202751 0311954 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 61.60 202752 0312094 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 45.60 202753 0312098 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 542.80 318039 118/2009 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 30.98 ALARM SERVICE - JAN 2009 202922 84026551 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 30.98 318040 1/812009 117481 AMLIE, TIM 75.01 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 202849 123008 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 75.01 318041 1/8/2009 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 286.86 COPIER PAPER 00001374 202701 1018912 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILD_ ING 286.86 318042 1/812009 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 96.62 CEILING TILES 00001308 202702 10028800 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 96.62 R55CKREG LOG20000 202600 47432800 5862.5512 CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 37.90 202754 47471200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register 287.11 202755 81744300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1/7/2009 -1/8 /2009 47477300 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318043 1/8/2009 202901 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 650.00 202960 47499000 193.96 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001551 202947 10048376 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 800.76 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001553 202948 10048868 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 994.72 967.55 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003742 202807 87034641 318044 1/8/2009 120447 BEC CORPORATION 3,687.73 1,029.65 RECYCLE TANK TRANSDUCER 00005203 202703 14143 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,492.16. NEW TRANSDUCER 8 DISPLAYS 00005202 202704 14141 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00001331 202852 2,521.81 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 364.00 318045 1/8/2009 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 318051 118/2009 461.15 MATTING 00002312 202850 00072059 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 461.15 318046 1/812009 122593 BELDE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,778.31 JANITORIAL SERVICES - 12/08 202851 938 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,778.31 318047 1/8/2009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 116/2009 9:35:39 Page - 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH PARK 112.55 202600 47432800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 37.90 202754 47471200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 287.11 202755 81744300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 830.85 202899 47477300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,370.30 202900 47477100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 964.40 202901 47477200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 650.00 202960 47499000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GEN ,ERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL WATER TREATMENT 5,253.11 318048 118/2009 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 349.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003790 202805 46864 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 349.38 318049 1/8/2009 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,720.18 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003740 202806 87030538 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 967.55 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003742 202807 87034641 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3,687.73 318050 1/812009 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 364.00 WATER ANALYSIS 00001331 202852 8120210 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 364.00 318051 118/2009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES FIRE DEPT. GEN ,ERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG jG20000 CITY . NA 1h.. a 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 3 1/7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 700.05 202601 13755 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 82.35 202602 13808 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 958.40 202603 13809 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,094.85 202756 13860 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 109.80 202757 13859 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,945.45 318052 1/812009 100677 CARGILL INC. 5,608.59 DE -ICER 00005307 202705 2401066 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,932.99 DEICING SALT 00005307 202853 2405011 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 7,541.58 318053 118/2009 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 57.68 HEADSET ACCESSORIES 00004461 202808 MRN8460 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 30.88 SERIAL TO USB ADAPTER 00004463 202809 MSC3352 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.56 318054 1/8/2009 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 8,178.03 5591458 -4 202706 121908 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 5,300.81. 5546504 -1 202707 DEC1908 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 264.21 5584310 -6 202810 122308 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 19.54 5590919 -6 202811 12/19/2008 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 1,950.90 5584304 -9 202812 12/16/08 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 15,713.49 318055 1/8/2009 123895 CHIM- CHIMINEY CHIMNEY SWEEP 300.00 CHIMNEY CLEANING 00002310 202854 122308 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 300.00 318056 118/2009 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 166.50 202758 381324 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 166.50 318057 11812009 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 44,373.50 JOINT POWERS - 4TH QTR 202855 43351 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 44,373.50 318058 118/2009 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 74.41 00103650 - 0155252016 202813 0155252016 -1210 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER PSTF OCCUPANCY 8 37.60 00103650 - 0155251026 202814 0155251026 -1210 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER PSTF OCCUPANCY 8 R55CKREG LOG20000 2,062.24 CITY OF EDINA 318059 Council Check Register 120433 COMCAST 1/7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 20.06 00103650- 0155251008 202815 0155251008 -12/0 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 8 1/8/2009 1,868.77 00077479- 0113317143 202949 0113317143 -12/0 5620.6189 SEWER & WATER 2,742.38 8 61.40 00078162 - 0120835016 202950 0120835016 -1210 5111.6189 SEWER & WATER 8 318061 5424.6406 1551.6103 5440.5511 5862.5514 5842.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 1553.6556 5913.6406 1260.6710 5610.6122 5430.6188 5511.6188 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/6/2009 9:35:39 Page- 4 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT RANGE CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADVERTISING OTHER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERING GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,062.24 318059 1/8/2009 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 10,614 0165667 202856 122308 74.95 318060 1/8/2009 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 JANITORIAL SERVICES - 1/2009 202923 7070138309 2,742.38 318061 1/812009 - 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 60.76 SHIRTS 00006358 202857 91162002 60.76 318062 1/812009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,597.00 202604 486381 1,426.60 202605 487070 44.80 202606 486383 959.40 202607 486382 1,673.10 202759 487072 43.90 202760 487073 7,744.80 318063 1/8/2009 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 412.64 WRENCHES, PRY BAR SET 00001435 202708 347358 412.64 318064 118/2009 105930 DELL MARKETING L.P. 388.68 LCDS 00004452 202816 XD2473NC3 1,227.65 LCDS 00004452 202816 XD2473NC3 1,616.33 318065 1/8/2009 102831 DEX EAST 443.00 110311867 202858 122708 55.00 110311893 202859 DEC2708 137.00 110311893 202859 DEC2708 5424.6406 1551.6103 5440.5511 5862.5514 5842.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 1553.6556 5913.6406 1260.6710 5610.6122 5430.6188 5511.6188 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/6/2009 9:35:39 Page- 4 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT RANGE CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADVERTISING OTHER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERING GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG _JG20000 CITY. iNA 11k_ .9 9:35:39 CouncilCheck'Register Page- 5 1!7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date ' Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 162.00 110311893 202859 DEC2708 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 250.00 110311893 202859 DEC2708 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,047.00 318066 1/6/2009 116357 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC. 680.84 MCOUAY ENGINEERING 202860 200903147 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 680.84 318067 1/8/2009 123253 DYNAMIC PUBLISHING LLC 650.00 2009 TOWN PLANNER AD. 202924 122606 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 650.00 2009 TOWN PLANNER AD 202924 122608 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 650.00 2009 TOWN PLANNER AD 202924 122608 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,950.00 318068 1/8/2009 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,907.65 202608 162579 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 855.85 202609 162578 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 82.10 202761 165268 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 9,656.32 202762 164220 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 753.78 202763 165269 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,244.56 202961 165273 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17,500.26 318069 1/8/2009 117483 ENGELE, LEE 125.00 ENTERTAINMENT 1/13/09 202916 123108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 318070 1/8/2009 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 23.96 CAP 00001239 202709 1012653347 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.96 318071 1/8/2009 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 45.27 R -91 PHONE 202861 1216139 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45.27 318072 118/2009 100025 GOLDEN SHOE STABLES INC. 750.00 WAGON RIDES ON 1 -11 -09 202921 010209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 750.00 318073 1/8/2009 101679 GOLFCRAFT INC. 121.25 FREIGHT CHARGES 00006030 202862 21410 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 121.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/6/2009 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 6 117/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318074 118/2009 120929 GOVCONNECTION INC. 63.95 POWER SUPPLIES 00004454 202817 44425335 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 63.95 318075 1/8/2009 101103 GRAINGER 66.50 HEX KEYS, MEASURING TAPE 00001380 202710 9804695931 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 130.14 SHELVING 00001473 202711 9806066040 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 196.64 318076 1/8/2009 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 830.75 202610 106509 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 162.25 202902 106646 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 993.00 318077 118/2009 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 2.75 SWITCH 00001381 202712 938753567 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 24.88 PUTTY, CAULK 00001381 202712 938753567 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 472.58 LIGHT BULBS 202863 938670672 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 500.21 318078 1/8/2009 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 10,650.00 1 ST QTRLY RETAINER- 2009 202925 121708 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10,650.00 318080 1/8/2009 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1,430.36 202611 163336 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 100.00 202612 163341 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 199.95 202613 163875 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 540.61 202614 162582 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 13.75- 202615 767733 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 352.07- 202616 768029 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 24.00- 202617 767685 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.10- 202618 767486 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 225.00- 202619 767732 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13.90- 202620 767849 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 162.15- 202621 -768028 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 153.10- 202622 766932 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 154.33 202764 164223 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,329.90 202765 164224 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,920.30 202766 164222 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 134.70 202767 164129 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING -IV213N30 ONIN33NION3 1N3W3OVld3U IN3Wdino3 OLL9'09ZL £LS9L£96 LZBZOZ £5660000 SOOT 86'£48 1VIM39 ONIM33NION3 LN3V0OVld3b 1NMdif103 OLL9'09ZL LZLLEE96 OZBZOZ £5660000 SOd LB'6L6'Z Maims Md OAS 1N30 1N3W3OV'ld3a 1N3WdU103 OLL9799L 8906096 6MOZ 56660000 SOOI'SOd SL'6L0'Z ONINNVId 1N3W33Vld3?3IN3Wdif103 OLL9'014L 89066256 6WZ0Z 96660000 SOd L6'£SL'L NOI1VUISINIWOV 1N3W3OVld3N1N3VU=3 %L9'OZLL 89066ZSV 6MOZ 56460000 SOOI 88'£8£ N30N011VU3dO1N3WdUl03 SI001 9999'E99 L 6L9L8E96 8L9Z0Z Z9660000 S3RJ0SS3OOVdOldVl £9'LLL ANVdWOO OMV)IOVd-lJ 31M3H 0899LL 60OZ /8 /L L808L£ 9£'098'66L W83N30 S3OIAUSS 1".LN30 3ONvdnSNI V2180O £b09'055L 98£ZSZLE 8Z6Z0Z 60OZ NVf - Wf11W3Hd LO'L98'8L 7VN3N30 S30IAU3S IVULN30 NOIIVZIIV11dSOH 0609'099 L 999ZSZL£ LZ6ZOZ 60OZ NVf - Wf1mMd S£'£66'08L Sa3NIHVd H1lV3H 96022E MUM 98084£ 06'009'6 1N3W1V3HlIJ31VM S31- Iddns.LN3W1V3Mkl31VM 9899'9M 6LLWZL 6LLZOZ 99L90000 SIVDIV43HO 06'0091, 'ONI SNIHMVH L000 MUM S808L£ 00'OOZ NOIIVZIISINIWOVIVINN3IN3O a3H10- OAS 'IVNOISS3dONd 9£49'4£95. 60ZM0 OZ6ZOZ 60-1VLNO0NIINIVd3OVj 00'OOZ S30Vd AddVH L8£LOL MUM 68084£ 00'09Z NOIIVNISINIWOV03 M3H10- OAS IVNOISS3d021d 9£L9'OM BOLEZL 698ZOZ 1N3A33A3SHV3AM3N 00'09Z S3OVd AddVH LS£LOL 6002/84 £8084£ 08'Z£Z' L lVN3N30 3ONVN3INIVW NLIVd SIOOHOS 8 S33N3U3dNOO 60L9'069L 90092E £LLZOZ IN3lN3SNf19W132! NOIllfll 08'Z£Z'L WVIIIIM'AINVH ££4404 6002184 ZSOBLE 96'69 L N30 NOI1V'd3dO1N3Wdif103 kUONnv -i LOZ9'£SSL 60SOLO 9Z6ZOZ 60OZ 3SVHOilfld WLIOdINn 56'691 0001'OV31SlVH L96ZOL MUM L808L£ £ L'6LS'6Z SNIl13S MHOA 3NIM OIOS SOOOS dO1SOO £L99'Z68S LLZ99L 906ZOZ 0£'9LL'Z SNIll3S NNOA XIW OIOS SOOOS dO ISOO SL997688 8LZ59L 906ZOZ 06'6£Z 9NIll3S MHOA NOfIOII OIOS S000O dO lSOO ZL99'Z6BS 6LZM 606ZOZ 88'866'9 ONIT13S NLIOA XIW 0,10S SOOOO dO lSOO 9455'2689 SLZM £06ZOZ Z6'6£Z 0NIll3S 1S H109 210f1011 OIOS SOOOS dOISOO ZLSS'ZZBS 69999L LLLZOZ 00'9LL SNIll3S 1S H109 mono l OIOS SOOOS dO 1SOO ZLSS'ZLBS OLZ99L OLLZOZ OL' LS6 ONIll3S 1S H109 3NIM OIOS SOOOS d01SOO £LS97Z89 LLZ99L 69LZOZ 0£'9LL ONIll3S NONb3A 3NIM OIOS SOOOO JO ISOO £L997989 2Z69L 99LZOZ 96'99VI? hull ssaulsng uondlloseO lun000V je6pelgnS oN lun000y ON Aul ON 000 # Od uolleueldx3 / jellddnS LunowV W0 # Noe4o 6002/8 /L— 60OZ/L/L L 06ed jals169a %oogo IlaunoO 6E :S£ :6 VL VP' 1 AIIO 000028' -- S3NN059M R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 116/2009 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 8 1/7/2009 — 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7,492.28 318088 1/8/2009 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 159.95 SCRUBBER REPAIRS 202865 7241150 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 159.95 318089 118/2009 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 335.61 PAINT 202866 026260741 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 335.61 318090 11812009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 536.75 202623 473266 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,675.45 202624 473609 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,212.20 318091 11812009 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 280.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 202867 123108 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 280.80 318092 1/8/2009 119094 HUMANA DENTAL 800.65 PREMIUM - JAN 2009 202929 931739973 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 10,774.48 PREMIUM - JAN 2009 202929 931739973 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 11,575.13 318093 11812009 100031 1 -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 10,830.70 2009 ANNUAL DUES 202930 010109 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 10,830.70 318094 1/8/2009 101233 IAAPA 539.00 MEMBERSHIP - ED MACHOLDA 202931 2009 DUES 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 539.00 318095 1/8/2009 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 283.75 202822 4281059 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 283.75 318096 1/8/2009 116188 INTERNATIONAL PLAY COMPANY 729.90 ADVENTURE PEAK NETTING 202868 IPC7788 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 729.90 318097 1/8/2009 101612 JACK RICHESON & CO. INC. 32.54 PALETTES 00009439 202823 0380193 -IN 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG ­G20000 CITY L AA 1/L 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page- 9 1/7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 32.54 318098 1/8/2009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,092.20 202625 1232281 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,729.00 202626 1232275 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 78.10 202627 1232265 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,429.05 202628 1232264 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 96.20 202772 1232311 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,065.05 202773 1232310 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,678.15 202962 1232327 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 154.00 202963 931333 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 125.20 202964 1232328 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 17,446.95 318101 11812009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 150.90 202629 1558852 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,103.52 202630 1558855 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,289.74 202631 1558856 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,553.47 202632 1558854 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,587.93 202633 1558853 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,503.06 202634 1558857 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.68 202635 1558848 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 223.35 202636 1558846 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 225.12 202637 1558845 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 338.56 202638 1558844 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 144.09 202639 1558843 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 102.12 202640 1558842 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,064.73 202641 1556325 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 379.53 202642 1556324 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 460.52 202643 1559620 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 303.89 202644 1559621 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING "2.24 202645 1558850 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1.12 202646 1547450 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 62.74 202647 1556329 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 185.49 202648 1556667 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 147.00 202649 1557828 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 289.29 202650 1558861 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,153.54 202651 1558860 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 74.45 202652 1558849 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,426.64 202653 1558863 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 318.36 202654 1558859 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,609.59 202655 1558862 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING i R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/6/2009 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 10 1f7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 97.92 202656 1558864 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,949.81 202657 1558865 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4.34- 202658 403148 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .28 202774 1547449 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 115.74 202775 1561060 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 326.81 202776 1561041 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 242.74 202777 1561043 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 70.30 202778 1561044 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 209.71 202779 1561047 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35.37 202780 1561048 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 9.00- 202781 403354 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 865.39 202907 1561054 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 740.28 202908 1561053 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 355.84 202909 1561057 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD YORK SELLING 31,699.52 318102 1/8/2009 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 25.23 THERMOSTAT 00001468 202715 005674 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 84.28 BLOWER, CAPACITOR 00001468 202715 005674 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 109.51 - 318103 1/8/2009 101322 JULIEN, DIANE 38.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 202716 122908 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 101.84 UNIFORM PURCHASE 2009 202932 010209 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 140.68 318104 1/8/2009 120296 KAASA, GUNNAR 1,232.80 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 202717 122908 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,232.80 318105 1/8/2009 104979 KOCON, ED 200.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 202869 123008 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 200.66 318106 1/8/2009 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 128.28 DWI IMPOUND 202718 122908 4601.610.3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE FORFEITURE 128.28 318107 1/8/2009 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 25.95 UNIFORM 202870 07168242 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 25.95 CITY t. AA 11%. 9:35:39 R55CKREG _ -oG20000 .Council Check Register Page - 11 11712009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318108 118/2009 115852 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 1,777.49 SNOW BLADE 00002303 202871 66720 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,777.49 318109 1/8/2009 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 276.50 CABLE TIES, PLOW BOLTS 00001382 202719 7614143 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 276.50 318110 118/2009 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 1,303.41 HANGER ASSEMBLIES 00001026 202720 00041063 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,303.41 318111 118/2009 118625 LORENTZ, MICHAEL 85.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 2009 202933 010209 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 85.95 318112 1/8/2009 122472 M & I BANK 56.32 SUPPLIES 202824 121508 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 282.79 SUPPLIES 202824 121508 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 418.90 SUPPLIES 202824 121508 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 758.01 318113 1/8/2009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,824.90 202659 52823 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,824.90 318114 1/812009 100866 MAMA 20.00 MAMA LUNCHEON 202935 2186 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 20.00 318115 1/812009 120502 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SOLUTIO 429.20 SECURITY COMPUTER REPAIR 202872 1608 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 429.20 318116 118/2009 100868 MARK VII SALES 4,004.00 202660 414495 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,345.50 262661 413950 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 60.00 202662 415677 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,996.20 202663 415676 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 842.00 202782 415847 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,880.30 202783 416479 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 126.00 202784 416480 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/6/2009 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 12 1/712009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,412.80 202785 416483 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 156.40 202786 416484 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20,823.20 318117 1/8/2009 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 296.07 PLANTS 00002114 202873 44915 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 296.07 318118 118/2009 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 100.00 ENTERTAINMENT 1/11/09 202915 123108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 318119 1/8/2009 101483 MENARDS 16.78 DRAIN KITS 00006172 202874 2398 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 425.47 LIGHTING 00002314 202875 90201 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 442.25 318120 1/812009 101987 MENARDS 131.79 GUTTER SUPPLIES 00002314 202876 49863 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 132.01 SANDER 00002305 202877 48749 5630.6556 TOOLS CENTENNIAL LAKES 263.80 318121 118/2009 123899 MENU DYNAMICS 1,040.00 RESTAURANT ADVERTISING 202934 23032 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,040.00 RESTAURANT ADVERTISING 202934 23032 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,080.00 RESTAURANT ADVERTISING 202934 23032 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 4,160.00 318122 1/8/2009 104650 MICRO CENTER 188.46 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00009444 202825 2006996 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 99.04- CREDIT 202826 1977459 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 8.52 FLOPPY DISKS 00004459 202827 2017749 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 53.23 NETWORK CABLE 00004459 202827 2017749 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 94.74 DVD BURNER 00004460 202828 2024481 1120.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION 69.21 VIDEO CARD 00004458 202829 2015401 1120.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION 10.64- RETURN 202830 2015369 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 304.48 318123 1/8/2009 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 124.11 - NEW YEARS EVE SUPPLIES 202878 123108 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 300.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 202879 DEC2008 5610.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ED ADMINISTRATION 424.51 R55CKREG _jG20000 CITY NA 11, 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/7/2009 — 1/6/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318124 11812009 102582 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 10.00 BOILER INSPECTION 00001483 202721 B42351RI524571 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 10.00 318125 1/812009 .101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 1,680.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION (6) 202936 010109 5923.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,680.00 318126 11812009 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 217.09 MOTOR 00001191 202722 0078664 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 130.11 VALVE ASSEMBLY 00001438 202723 0078673 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 347.20 318127 11812009 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 93.54 STORAGE UNIT 202831 151018538 7412.6153 STORAGE PSTF RANGE 93.54 318128 1/8/2009 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT 500.00 HOSTING FEE 202724 125473 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 318129 1/8/2009 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 1/13/09 202917 123108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 318130 1/8/2009 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,500.00 WEDDING GUIDE AD 202880 W244882 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 318131 118/2009 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 575.91- CREDIT 202882 CR #30710 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,914.20 PLASTICWARE 202883 32252 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,338.29 318132 1/812009 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 45.00 BUSINESS CARDS 202832 1392 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 45.00 318133 118/2009 103632 NEXT DAY GOURMETISUPERIOR PROD 283.62 MICROWAVE 00009451 202833 8421063 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 263.62 R55CKREG LOG20000 2,798.25 CITY OF EDINA 202726 121999 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE Council Check Register 2,798.25 11712009 - 118/2009 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318134 1/8/2009 6X4X8 PEASANT GIRL 00009431 202837 117102 NORTH A_ MERICAN SALT CO. 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 10,411.09 DE -ICING SALT 00005306 202725 70295089 1318.6525 SALT 318139 5,601.89 DEICING SALT 00005306 202881 70296126 1318.6525 SALT 16,012.98 1,696.50 202664 8208810 -IN 318135 1/8/2009 VERNON SELLING 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 446.99 202787 8209136 -IN 160.72 CANVAS, WATER COLORS 00009448 202834 36811100 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 65.09- RETURN 00009432 202835 36701900 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 95.63 318136 1/8/2009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 48780386 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 118.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009452 202836 456474977 -001 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 318141 39.27 PLANNER, THERMAL PAPER 00002303 202884 457305432 -001 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.77 BINDERS, 3 -HOLE PUNCH 00006034 202885 457191056 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 16.34 LABELS, ENVELOPES 00006034 202886 457522929 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123008 1160.6107 204.11 FINANCE 9.90 318137 118/2009 1120.6104 120860 OLSSON ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION 14.97 1/6/2009 9:35:39 Page- 14 Business Unit SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP MEDIA STUDIO ED ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,798.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES 202726 121999 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,798.25 318138 1/8/2009 100247 ORLANDI STATUARY CO. INC. 32.17 6X4X8 PEASANT GIRL 00009431 202837 02444923 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 32.17 318139 118/2009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,696.50 202664 8208810 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 446.99 202787 8209136 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,143.49 318140 118 12009 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 241.02 202887 48780386 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 241.02 318141 118/2009 100950 PETTY CASH 4.00 202746 123008 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.15 202746 123008 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 9.90 202746 123008 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 14.97 202746 123008 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 17.10 202746 123008 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 17.16 202746 123008 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG _ -jG20000 CITY L AA 11. 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 15 1!7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 17.55 202746 123008 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 21.22 202746 123008 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.21 202746 123008 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.60 202746 123008 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 30.00 202746 123008 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38.02 202746 123008 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 40.46 202746 123008 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.45 202746 123008 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 45.63 202746 123008 1180.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 51.04 202746 123008 1265.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.00 202746 123008 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 68.45 202746 123008 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 139.23 202746 123008 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 148.59 202746 123008 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 161.72 202746 123008 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 992.45 318143 1/8/2009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE 8, SPIRITS 138.73 202665 2698949 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,278.65 202666 2698948 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 98.24 202667 2698947 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,682.70 202668 2698946 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 340.85 202669 2698943 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 176.99 202670 2698945 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 579.26 202671 2698944 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 231.12 202672 2695843 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,201.64 202673 2699534 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,037.39 202674 2698954 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,097.60 202675 2698951 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 98.24 202676 2698952 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 233.36 202677 2698953 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 17.58- 202678 3400794 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 3.78- 202679 3400796 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 93.38- 202680 3400857 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 16.50- 202681 3400793 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9.33- 202682 3400858 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 11.04- 202683 3400795 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 20.97- 202684 3400797 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 85.02- 202685 3400661 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,384.61 202788 2700655 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 27.75- 202789 3400800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS. ADAPTIVE RECREATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL ELECTION ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING ELECTION TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FINANCE PLANNING COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 116/2009 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 16 1/7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6.99- 202790 3400799 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.93- 202791 3400798 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 917.59 202911 2700661 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 549.67 202912 2700659 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 649.50 202965 2701648 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16,395.87 318144 1/8/2009 112490 PLOURDE, PATTY 6,967.26 REIMBURSEMENT FOR WINDOWS 202727 121708 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 6,967.26 318145 1/8/2009 100961 POSTMASTER -USPS 290.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 202945 010209 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 290.00 318146 1/8/2009 106152 POWERPLAN 73.92 SWITCH 00001187 202888 P40653 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 796.39 STARTER 00001189 202889 P40654 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 870.31 318147 118/2009 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 161.04 202792 165272 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 161.04 318148 1/8/2009 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,093.58 LINERS, ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE 00002111 202890 4354 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,093.58 318149 1/8/2009 100971 QUALITY WINE 784.83 202686 101467 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 296.00 202687 101653 -00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,046.49 202688 102671 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,410.50 202689 102652 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,850.38 202690 102732 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 200.00- 202691 095696 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 200.00- 202692 090586-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,138.40 202793 103815 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,016.29 202794 103137 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 754.20 202795 103816 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 205.20 202796 103138 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 715.59 202797 103461 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,051.68 202910 103519 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG G20000 CITY L AA 1 /b,_ ,. 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 17 1/7/2009 — 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 16,869.56 318150 11812009 123898 QWEST 55.24 952 929 -0297 202955 0297 -12/08 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 209.13 952 927 -8861 202956 8861 -12108 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 78.49 952 929 -9549 202957 9549 -12108 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 342.86 318151 1/812009 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 1,501.65 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001589 202951 461 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,501.65 318152 1/8/2009 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 225.73 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 00001554 202952 53394 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 225.73 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 00001555 202953 53395 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 451.46 318153 1/8/2009 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 22.34 HITCH PIN LOCK 00001279 202728 1496933 -02 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 22.34 318154 1/8/2009 102066 RUST, ROGER 240.00 ICE CARVING ON 1 -11 -09 202919 010209 5631.6136 240.00 318155 1/8/2009 103836 SCHEERER, DANIEL 3,550.00 PAINTING AT STATION 2 202838 122708 1470.6215 3,550.00 318156 1/812009 103.409 SHAMROCK GROUP 144.32 ICE BLOCKS FOR FESTIVAL 202918 010209 5631.6406 144.32 318157 118/2009 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 3,477.74 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR 202839 64187360 7411.6103 3,477.74 318158 1/8/2009 100629 SMITH, AMY 184.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 202891 123008 5410.6107 184.28 318159 118/2009 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 8,225.60 CITY OF EDINA 1/6/2009 9:35:39 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 18 1/7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,415.68 FIRST QUARTER 2009 202937 200902 2210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 3,415.68 318160 1/8/2009 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC - 117.56 PROPANE 00001485 202729 OQ351 -51- 003498 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 117.56 318161 1/8/2009 104672 SPRINT 327.92 CARD READERS 202840 312188813 -013 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 327.92 318162 1/8/2009 101004 SPS COMPANIES 44.03 BUSHINGS, HEAT SHIELD 00001378 202730 S1970006.001 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 44.03 318163 1/8/2009 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 475.96 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001360 202954 SW51801 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 475.96 318164 1/8/2009 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 122.37 SPINNERS 00001472 202731 12172 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.37 318165 118/2009 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 500.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 202841 1151797 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 202841 1151797 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 202841 1151797 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 500.00 . EDINA LIQUOR AD 202842 1150434 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 202842 1150434 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 202842 1150434 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 3,000.00 318166 1/8/2009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 528.00 202798 JM6748 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 528.00 318167 1/8/2009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 118.75 202693 522996 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,674.85 202694 522997 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,432.00 202799 523676 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8,225.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY C JA 1/� 9:35:39 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/7/2009 - 1/8/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318168 1/8/2009 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 202938 2008 -27387 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 202938 2008 -27387 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 202938 2008 -27387 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 318169 118/2009 - 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 512.00 WELDING SUPPLIES 00002095 202892 246960 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 512.00 318170 1/8/2009 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 177.50 GIFT CARDS 202939 23571 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 177.50 GIFT CARDS 202939 23571 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 177.50 GIFT CARDS 202939 23571 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 532.50 318171 1/8/2009 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 233.41 HINGES, ROLLERS 00001480 202732 307533 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 233.41 318172 1/8/2009 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 19.68 BOX COVERS, FUSES 00001469 202893 691724 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.68 318173 1/8/2009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 170.00 BLDG OFFICIALS SEMINAR 202940 123008 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 170.00. 318174 1/6/2009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 85.00 REGISTRATION- J. ONISCHUK 202941 182000 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00 318175 1/8/2009 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 7.17 SHIPPING 00001141 202843 11 -18 -08 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 7.88 SHIPPING 00004441 202844 11/18/08 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 81.43 SHIPPING 00009428 202845 11 -07 -08 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 96.48 318176 1/8/2009 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 668.84 OXYGEN 00003649 202846 201363 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 668.84 R55CKREG LOG20000 12,000.00 PRESERVATION CONSULTANT FEES CITY OF EDINA 29003 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING Council Check Register 1/7/2009 - 1/8/2009 104106 WAACK, SUSAN Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318177 1/8/2009 010209 101550 VIKING IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 100.96 130.00 2009 LICENSES DECALS 202942 2329 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 318182 1/8/2009 130.00 318178 1/8/2009 180.00 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 0038610 -IN 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,429.70 CABINET, SIGN 00001246 202733 220334 1646.6556 TOOLS 1,429.70 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 318179 1/8/2009 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 985.90 202800 209080 -00 5862.5513 333.29 FOOD 00002311 202894 24619519 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 202801 208605-00. 535.31 FOOD 00002309 202895 24585449 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 202802 868.60 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 318180 1/8/2009 202913 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1/6/2009 9:35:39 Page - 20 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES 12,000.00 PRESERVATION CONSULTANT FEES 202943 29003 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 12,000.00 318181 1/8/2009 104106 WAACK, SUSAN 100.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 2009 202944 010209 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 100.96 318182 1/8/2009 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 180.00 PUMP REPAIRS 00001482 202734 0038610 -IN 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 180.00 318183 1/8/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 985.90 202800 209080 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 160.00- 202801 208605-00. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10.67- 202802 207766 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 356.30 202913 209254 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,171.53 318184 1/812009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 113.12 202695 257774 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 320.48 202696 257776 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 507.10 202697 257777 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 243.36 202698 257775 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 376.93 202699 257939 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 335.36 202803 258232 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,896.35 318185 1/8/2009 123655 WISCONSIN LIGHTING INC. R55CKREG .G20000 CITY NA Council Check Register 1/7/2009 - 1/812009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No _ Inv No Account No Subledgar Account Description 75.00 202700 41414 5642.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 75.00 318186 1/8/2009 405.56 405.56 318187 1/8/2009 482.80 1,068.18 295.80 1,846.78 318188 11812009 453.32 8.52 11.69 34.84 513.20 1,625.40 1,103.10 59.10 107.33 54.92 1,953.33 2,094.03 139.09 31,050.80 11,334.26 665.65 51,208.58 674,439.63 121699 WM LAMPTRACKER INC. LAMP RECYCLING 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC. 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 50054543 51 -0050184 -2 51- 6541084 -2 51-6892224 -5 51- 8324712 -5 51- 5547446 -1 51- 5107681-1 51- 4420190 -3 51- 8526048 -8 51- 6692497-0 51- 6223269 -1 51- 4159265 -8 51- 8987646 -8 51. 4621797 -2 51- 4888627 -1 51- 9021684 -9 CONCRETE REPAIRS Grand Total 202896 304003 4095.6103 202804 222644 5822.5513 202914 . 222568 5862.5513 202966 222763 5842.5513 202735 179305223 202736 179490772 202737 179582616 202738 179510043 202739 179530852 202740 179577207 202741 179308014 202742 179292217 202743 179537366 202744 179504685 202745 179336276 202847 179451521 202897 179748017 202898 179671242 202958 179981386 202959 176708155 5913.6185 4086.6103 1646.6185 1330.6185 1321.6185 1628.6185 5111.6185 1321.6185 1322.6185 1460.6185 5210.6185 7411.6185 1321.6185 1321.6185 5511.6185 1314.6520 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 674,439:63 Total Payments 674,439.63 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1, 9:35:39 Page - 21 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH STREET RUBBISH COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION AQUATIC WEEDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE GOLF DOME PROGRAM PSTF OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS STREET RENOVATION R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 1/7/2009 - 118/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 396,404.57 02100 CDBG FUND 6,967.26 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 6,298.13 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 597.60 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,929.02 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,203.33 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 539.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 11,731.08 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 11,488.42 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 19,487.91 05800 LIQUOR FUND 197,308.48 05900 UTILITY FUND 10,366.04 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 9,118.79 Report Totals 674,439.63 We wnHrm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing. poll p-194 and proced e 1 a 1/6/2009 9:36:57 Page- 1 CITY OF. , 1/14,. 8:04:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 1115/2009 - 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318189 1/15/2009 101833 A.T.O.M. 200.00 MEMBERSHIP 203336 010609 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 318190 1/15/2009 101833 A.T.O.M. 175.00 WINTER CONFERENCE 203337 15381033 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 175.00 318191 1/15/2009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 62,72 203219 0721750 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.56 203220 0721751 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 18.56 203484 0721570 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 99.84 318192 1115/2009 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 181.05 INSTALL VIDEO SYSTEM #138 203136 6258 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 351.45 INSTALLATION #195 203137 6265 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 95.85 FIXED OPTICOM KILL #135 203138 6296 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 95.85 REWIRE STAGE 3 #131 203139 6271 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 724.20 318193 1115/2009 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 593.42 MAIL PROCESSING 203281 212371 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 593.42 318194 1/15/2009 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 904.77 TONER CARTRIDGES 203140 INVOOD88594 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 904.77 318195 1/15/2009 116355 ALIGNEX INC. 312.50 SOFTWARE INSTALLATION 203284 9165 1260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL 312.50 318196 1/15/2009 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 326.44 EVENT CALENDARS 203338 74576 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 326.44 318197 1/15/2009 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 1,855.45 TUNNEL FAN REPAIR 00002118 203282 5760 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,855.45 318198 1/15/2009 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 Check # , Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 35,380.00 RECYCLING 203283 1620156 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 35,380.00 1,229.13 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 318199 1/15/2009 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 181.05 KEYBOARD 203141 INV77136 2210.6406 181.05 7091 60.86 318200 1/15/2009 105086 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI 7092 173.00 DUES 00001334 203339 2000694635 5913.6406 173.00 52.50 RADIO SERVICE 00001498 202972 318201 1/15/2009 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 256.77 48.89 PAPER 202968 10186538 -00 5822.6512 48.89 PAPER 202968 10186538 -00 5862.6512 145.84 PAPER 202968 10186538 -00 5842.6512 248.39 COPIER PAPER 00006396 203142 10186753 -000 5410.6513 737.12 COPIER PAPER 203340 10187468 -00 1550.6406 1553.6237 1553.6237 1553.6237 1553.6237 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES RADIO SERVICE RADIO SERVICE RADIO SERVICE RADIO SERVICE 01213.1705.20 1,229.13 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5410.6122 318202 1/15/2009 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 90.91 RADIO SERVICE 00001498 202969 7091 60.86 RADIO SERVICE 00001498 202970 7092 52.50 RADIO SERVICE 00001498 202971 7093 52.50 RADIO SERVICE 00001498 202972 7094 256.77 318203 1/15/2009 103065 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 585.45 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005456 203285 28624 590.80 SPRINKLER REPAIR 203286 28974 1,176.25 318204 1/1512009 119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 70.00 EBROCHURE 00006176 203341 13743 70.00 318205 1/15/2009 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 350.29 CUTTING EDGE 00006244 203143 10048624 9.97 CLEVIS PIN KITS 00006382 203144 10048809 360.26 318206 1/1512009 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 1553.6237 1553.6237 1553.6237 1553.6237 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES RADIO SERVICE RADIO SERVICE RADIO SERVICE RADIO SERVICE 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5422.6530 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Page - 2 Business Unit RECYCLING COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK_ SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 176.94 WASTE DISPOSAL 203342 S146354- 58398' 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY CITY OF - -A 11141- - 8:04:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 Check #. Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 176.94 318207 1/15/2009 119603 B &D PLUMBING & HEATING 51.28 PERMIT REFUND 203287 ED092790 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 51.28 318208 1/1512009 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 928.50 SANITARY SEWER COMP PLAN 203288 232701-106.00 -14 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 19,551.45 SEWER MANHOLE INSPECTIONS 203397 23270696.00 -17 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 20,479.95 318209 1/15/2009 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 42.58 BATTERIES 00003795 203343 18- 228684 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 42.58 318210 111512009 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 51.44 BATTERY 00001439 202973 C7884 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 211.16 BATTERIES 00001505 202974 C7889 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.00- CREDIT 203289 C7902 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 200.60 318211 1115/2009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 272,58 203047 47571200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 913.46 203048 47471100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,840.95 203049 47471000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 150.00 203050 47484600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 337.58 203221 81771400 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 851.02 203485 47606700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 905.50 203486 47606600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,271.09 318212 1115/2009 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 780.00 SNOW REMOVAL 203395 133257 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 975.00 SNOW REMOVAL 203438 133257 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,755.00 318213 1/15/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 26.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203145 WO- 540362 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 181.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203290 OE- 180310 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 122.15 BOXES, OFFICE SUPPLIES 203344 OE- 182017 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 275.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203345 WO- 540251 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 604.71 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318214 1/15/2009 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 9,837.24 FINAL PAYMENT 203146 011108 01348.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10,657.02 FINAL PAYMENT 203146 011108 01349.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 20,494.26 318215 1/15/2009 123904 BLOOMINGTON HTG & A/C 17.60 PERMIT REFUND 203291 ED092755 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS 17.60 318216 1115/2009 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 28.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003796 203346 47161.1 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 104.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003796 203347 47161.1 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132.34 318217 1115/2009 - 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 124.88 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003742 203348' 87036347 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 124.88 318218 1115/2009 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 126.50 203222 94443 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 134.33 203487 94442 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 260.83 318219 1/15/2009 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 220.38 PIPE ASSEMBLY, CLAMP 00001440 202975 259716 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 331.34 V -BELT, PULLEY ASSEMBLY 00001432 203147 258396 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5.96 CAP 00005916 203148 251053 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 119.00 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00001446 203349 261230 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 68.75 VALVE RELAY 00001450 203350 261810 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 745.43 318220 1115/2009 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 136.00 CONCRETE MIX 203292 299057 10091.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 136.00 318221 1/15/2009 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 582.74 NEWSLETTER 00008221 203351 16405 1628.6575 PRINTING 582.74 318222 1115/2009 121521 CABELXS MKTG & BRAND MGT INC. 246.40 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00001250 203352 0692727 -01 1640.6201 LAUNDRY 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Page- 4 Business Unit BA-348 PARKLAWN - FRANCE TO YORK BA-349 76TH ST- FRANCE TO YORK INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BR-3 Browndale Avenue Bridge SENIOR CITIZENS PARK MAINTENANr NERAL 385.39 318230 1/15/2009 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 225 00 CLASS FEE 203151 00316365 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 318231 1/15/2009 105851 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 100.00 DEPOSIT FOR SHOW 203354 011209 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS CITY OF - .+ 1/141- 8:04:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 1/15/2009 — 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 246.40 318223 1/15/2009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 624.50 203051 13858 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,005.30 203052 13956 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 397.30 203053 13954 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 15.10 203054 13953 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6,042.20 318224 1/15/2009 100677 CARGILL INC. 3,873.10 DEICER SALT 00005307 203353 2411980 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 3,873.10 318225 111512009 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 257.81 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203149 010709 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 257.81 318226 1/15/2009 111089 CARLSON, ERIC 28.16 GUN CLEANING KITS 203150 010609 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.16 318227 1/1512009 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 219.00 203055 80736 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 396.00 203056 80765 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,263.00 203057 80749 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 159.00 203223 80764 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,037.00 318228 1/15/2009 100681 CATCO 140.18 SLEEVES, STRAPS 00001500 202976 3 -64864 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.18 318229 1/15/2009 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 38539 FILM /SLIDE SCANNER 00004449 202977 MSN3299 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 385.39 318230 1/15/2009 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 225 00 CLASS FEE 203151 00316365 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 318231 1/15/2009 105851 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 100.00 DEPOSIT FOR SHOW 203354 011209 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 6 1/15/2009 - 1115/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 318232 1/15/2009 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 435.00 TRAINING PRESENTATION 202978 43350 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 435.00 318233 1/15/2009 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 320.00 ENGINE REPAIRS 203398 1286 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 320.00 318234 1/15/2009 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 328.00 COCOA, CAPPUCCINO 00002319 203152 0739809 -IN 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 328.00 318235 1/15/2009 120433 COMCAST 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 203153 122408 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 61.90 8772 10 614 0177449 203154 122508 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 22.60 8772 10 614 0220686 203355 010209 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 143.50 318236 1/15/2009 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 1,678.73 REPAIR CONDENSER MOTOR 00008088 202979 66342 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,678.73 318237 1/1512009 103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC. 44.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001594 202980 92562240 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001594 202980 92562240 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 172.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001594 202980 92562240 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,054.51 CARTRIDGES 203293 92567974 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,342.78 318238 1/1512009 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 74.57 CASTER WHEELS 00002121 203294 145194 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 74:57 318239 1/15/2009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 598.00 203058 487688 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,290.61 203059 487974 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 299.00 203060 487687 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,088.82 203061 487973 5822.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 855.20 203062 487000 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,338.05 203063 487071 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1/14/x_ 8:04:16 Page- 7 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EB /CL BALANCE SHEET CITY OF F -...A R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/15/2009 — 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 720.00 203213 487074 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 75.80 203488 487986 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,803.61 203489. 487985 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 12,069.09 318240 1/1512009 100713 DAY - TIMERS INC. 170.63 CALENDARS 00002130 203356 58771033 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 170.63 318241 111512009 101657 DEHN, BRUCE 157.56 2009 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203357 010509 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 157.56 318242 1/15/2009 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 26.77 RIVETER 00001213 203295 348116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 54.28 CLAMP 00001213 203296 342939 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 54.28- RETURN 203297 348600 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 26.77 318243 1/15/2009 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 3,183.52 DEC 2008 SURCHARGE 202981 5504053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE 3,183.52 318244 1/15/2009 101947 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1,260.00 CJDN - 4TH QTR 203310 P07MN027060M9F 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 660.00 CJDN - 4TH QTR 203311 P07MD02706009F .1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE 1,920.00 318245 1/15/2009 115356 DIEKMAN, LARRY 111.33 2009 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203439 010409 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 111.33 318246 1/1512009 123162 DISH NETWORK 38.34 8255 70 708 1422839 203359 010409 7411.6190 OTHER UTILITIES 38.34 318247 1/15/2009 120696 DRAPER, LAURENE 2,000.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 203360 010909 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2,000.00 318248 1115/2009 116357 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC. 8,277.96 MCQUAY ENGINEERING 203399 200903254 5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1/14/x_ 8:04:16 Page- 7 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EB /CL BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1114/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 8 1115/2009 — 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 8,277.96 318249 1/15/2009 100739 EAGLE WINE 8,040.50 203224 167364 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,386.65 203225 168720 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 'VERNON SELLING 1,024.70 203226 167371 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 577.13 203227 168731 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,028.98 318250 1115/2009 123906 EATON, BREANNE 140.00 EMT TESTING 203363 010209 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 140.00 318251 1115/2009 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 1,125.59 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003650 203400 1130183 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,125.59 318252 111512009 122951 ETICA FAIR TRADE WINE 352.50 203064 1390 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 352.50 318253 1/15/2009 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,590.25 DEC 2008 TRANSPORTS 202982 010509 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,590.25 318254 1/15/2009 101432 FERRELLGAS 12.83 L.P. FUEL 00008084 203364 RNT2471492 5521.6581 GASOLINE ARENA ICE MAINT 12.83 318255 1/15/2009 104474 FILTERFRESH 228.85 COFFEE 00001611 203366 79471676 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 228.85 318256 1115/2009 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 132.00 FIRE BOOTS 00003764 203401 6013 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 132.00 318257 1115/2009 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 203298 16707 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 318258 1/15/' - 105072 FLYNN, MARY 1114 9:04:16 CITY OF Page 9 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 Subledger Account Description Des_ � Business Unit Slier / Explanation Supplier PO # Doc No Inv No Account No _ PARKING PERMITS.. STREET REVOLVING Check # Date Amount 203365 010809 4090.4751 12.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 12.00 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 318259 111512009 102727 FORCE AMERICA 00001444 203367 01314154 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 637.17 GEAR PUMP 637.17 100179 FRAGALE, ANNETTE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 318260 1115/2009 203333 010909 5610.6136 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 150.00 122074 FULTON, LAURA GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 18261 3118261 1/1512009 PETTY CASH 010509 5630.6406 REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 4.18 203368 010509 5630.6180 160.00 PETTY CASH 164.18 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 318262 1/1512009 100764 G & K SERVICES 203369 1006352801 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 61.92 SHOP TOWELS 61.92 PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 318263 1115/2009 105508 GEMPLEWS INC. 00001248 203299 1012672152 1640.6201 LAUNDRY 102.85 UNIFORM PURCHASE 102.85 119737 GLOCK INC. CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 318264 1115/2009 203440 010809 1400.6104 750.00 GLOCK ARMOR SCHOOL 750.00 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCLUSION PROGRAM 318265 111512009 INTERPRETING SERVICES 202983 123008 4078.6103 1,088.79 1,088.79 10 0780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 318266 111512009 00001337 203402 8120458 5913.6103 275.50 DEC 2008 SERVICE 275.50 318267 111512009 101103 GRAINGER 9806931656 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL OF COURSE & GROUNDS 179.97 LIGHT FIXTURE 00001307 202984 00006246 203155 9803022442 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 78.57 OIL PLATFORM 00 006375 203156 9803622613 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS 4.98 THREADED TEE 00006247 203157 9803501049 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 229.08 CABINET 00001481 203158 9807664298 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 54.99 SLEDGE HAMMER, KNEE PADS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 36.76 LIGHT BULBS 9.27 BATTERIES CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00002123 203300 9806931649 5620.6406 00002124 203301 9807080214 5620.6406 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Page - 10 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 593.62 318268 1/1512009 102613 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00001546 202985 428417 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00001547 202986 428438 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.90 318269 1/15/2009 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,502.25 203065 _ 106659 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 268.50 203214 106657 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 542.75 203490 106904 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 354.75 203491 106899 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,668.25 318270 1115/2009 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 15.50 NEW YEARS BALLOONS 203403 010809 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 15.50 NEW YEARS BALLOONS 203403 010809 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 28.43 NEW YEARS BALLOONS 203403 010809 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 56.60 STORE PROMOTION 203403 010809 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 56.60 STORE PROMOTION 203403 010809 5860.6406 • GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 56.61 STORE PROMOTION 203403 010809 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 59.06 TONER CARTRIDGE 203441 010909 5820.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 59.06 TONER CARTRIDGE 203441 010909 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 71.04 TONER CARTRIDGE, PENS 203441 010909 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 180.29 BAR SUPPLIES 203441 010909 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 598.69 318272 1/15/2009 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 5,557.60 203066 168735 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 216.34 203067 168734 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 128.17 203068 168726 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 817.88 203069 168730 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 57.10 203070 168729 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 930.25 203071 168728 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 89.53 203072 167370 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8,193.55 203073 165276 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,486.35 203228 167365 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 299.25 203229 168722 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 167.75 203230 168723 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 299.37 203231 168721 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1/141 3:04:16 Page - 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF . R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/15/2009 — 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 203232 168724 5862.5512 6,020.12 203233 167366 5862.5512 5,235.99 203234 167372 5842.5513 1,639.85 203235 168732 5842.5513 121.05 203236 168733 5842.5515 63.10 203237 768407 5842.5512 96.85- 203238 766669 5842.5512 112.46- 203239 768217 5862.5512 166.85- 203240 768218 5862.5512 20.08- 203492 168586 5842.5512 1.15 203493 167374 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1/141 3:04:16 Page - 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 23,162.25 57,090.41 318273 111512009 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 119.18 REGISTER TAPE 00007515 203370 262987 119.18 318274 1/1512009 103725 HAMER, STEVE 5919.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS TRAINING 616.40 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 203404 123108 616.40 318275 1115/2009 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10,306.80 GASOLINE 00001437 202987 119506 1553.6581 10,306.80 318276 1/1512009 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 257.62 2009 FEES 203371 010509 257.62 318277 1115/2009 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,517.92 RADIO ADMIN FEE 203302 28128623 1400.6151 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 143.20 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00001621 203405 28128685 1553.6237 1,661.12 318278 1115/2009 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER BOARD &ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 2,541.00 NOV 2008 RM & BD 203159 2008 11 -EDINA 1195.6225 2,541.00 318279 1115/2009 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 14,931.21 2008 TIF FEE 203372 TIF 1000.1303 14,931.21 R55CKREG LOG20000 524.25 CITY OF EDINA 203074 474307 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING Council Check Register 126.00 203075 474409 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318280 1/15/2009 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 715.50 203215 473817 5862.5514 2,403.00 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 202988 QB8164 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 203494 2,403.00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 318281 1115/2009 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 318285 399.55 CLEANERS, SOAP 00002126 203373 2730263 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 399.55 225.00 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 203161 318282 111512009 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 102483 HILTI INC. 225.00 231.36 DRILL BITS 00001484 203160 1605829247 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/15/2009 231.36 318283 1/15/2009 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S PERMIT REFUND 203304 ED091137 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 24.46 PAINT 203303 020500363 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.46 318287 1/15/2009 318284 1/1512009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 1114/2009 8:04:16 Page- 12 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK COLLECTION SYSTEMS PSTF OCCUPANCY 524.25 203074 474307 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 126.00 203075 474409 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 621.00 203076 473786 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 715.50 203215 473817 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 41.90 203494 474371 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,028.65 318285 1115/2009 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 225.00 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 203161 007 -054 -9 47056.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MASTER PLAN: COUNTRYSIDE 225.00 318286 1/15/2009 108658 HOME DEPOT 66.60 PERMIT REFUND 203304 ED091137 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 66.60 318287 1/15/2009 103214 HOOTEN CLEANERS 314.90 2008 LAUNDRY 203162 123108 1400.6201 LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 314.90 318288 1/1512009 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 259.70 STAIN INHIBITOR 00002122 203305 8122310 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 132.19 STAIN INHIBITOR 00002122 203306 8122303 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 391.89 318289 1H5/1 -^ 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL WATER TREATMENT PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.12 BUDGET BOOK COVERS 202990 10700 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 128.87 BUDGET BOOKS 202991 10688 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 9 603 00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 203166 10812 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 9,995.99 318299 1/1512009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN CITY OF , .1 1/14/,-_ 8:04:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 318291 1115/2009 100001 ICEMAN INDUSTRIES INC Council Check Register Page - 13 3,502.50 1/15/2009 — 1/15/2009 4103 1318.6525 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 73.45 2009 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203374 010609 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 73.45 100409 IN- CONTROL INC. 318290 1/1512009 105007 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY 500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 00001336 203163 08111DC01 557 72 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 203375 0112459 -09 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL WATER TREATMENT PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.12 BUDGET BOOK COVERS 202990 10700 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 128.87 BUDGET BOOKS 202991 10688 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 9 603 00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 203166 10812 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 9,995.99 318299 1/1512009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 557.72 318291 1115/2009 100001 ICEMAN INDUSTRIES INC 3,502.50 DE -ICING SPRAY 00001290 201147 4103 1318.6525 SALT 3,502.50 318292 1/15/2009 100409 IN- CONTROL INC. 500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 00001336 203163 08111DC01 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 500.00 318293 1/15/2009 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 93.26 DOG FENCE REPAIR 00001084 203307 115328 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 93.26 318294 1115/2009 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 114.49 EMBLEMS 203376 29300 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 114.49 318295 1115/2009 118275 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 57.82 DATE PAID STAMP 202989 705562 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.82 318296 1/1512009 101612 JACK RICHESON & CO. INC. 100.10 POTTERY KITS 00009439 203164 0381681 -IN 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100.10 318297 1/1512009 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 78.74 AIR HORN 00001598 203165 0012250 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 78.74 318298 1115/2009 102146 JESSEN PRESS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL WATER TREATMENT PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.12 BUDGET BOOK COVERS 202990 10700 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 128.87 BUDGET BOOKS 202991 10688 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 9 603 00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 203166 10812 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 9,995.99 318299 1/1512009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 14 1/1512009 - 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,205.80 203077 1232331 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 953.05 203078 1232337 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,504.36 203079 1232329 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,053.65 203216 1232312 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,255.11 203241 1232366 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17.55 203242 1232357 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,332.24 203242 1232357 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 30.00- 203377 1236722 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 359.25 203495 1232373 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,388.00 203496 1232358 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 29,039.01 318302 1/1512009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 74.45 203080 1561049 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,270.00 203081 1561056 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,937.72 203082 1561052 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,258.50 203083 1561055 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,220.46 203084 1561058 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 203085 1557574 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2.24 203086 1558847 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,050.21 203087 1558858 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 640.13 203088 1561045 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,135.48 203089 1561046 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 30.00- 203090 404230 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 532.66 203217 1561042 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,072.32 203243 1561059 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,490.70 203244 1561051 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING, 1,244.47 203245 1565264 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,494.94 203246 1565267 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 297.80 203247 1565256 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 794.78 203248 1565268 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,448.43 203249 1565265 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,452.49 203250 1565269 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,061.20 203251 1565266 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 102.62- 203252 404727 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 53.61- 203253 404728 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 363.36- 203254 404374 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17.53- 203255 404231 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9.02- 203256 404233 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,694.42 203497 1565260 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,434.82 203498 1565258 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 1.12 5,785.32 35.37 1,474.91 1,418.24 2,186.35 135.14 1,162.88 760.95 1;000.92 829.13 735.84 15.26- 26.01- 4.15- 47,513.95 318303 1115/2009 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 144.95 MOTOR, CAPACITOR 00005409 202992 006639 1470.6406 144.95 318304 1/15/2009 121481 KAPLAN PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS 638.00 DATABASE MODIFICATIONS 203378 8122030 638.00 318305 1/15/2009 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 107.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107.96 318306 111512009 209.97 199.99 362.32 51.99 222.33 695.91 2,476.72 4,219.23 318307 1115/2009 97.94 97.94 111018 KEEPRS INC. UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 123902 KIM, DANIEL OVERPAYMENT REFUND 203379 010709 1400.4332 1400.6203 1/14,. 8:04:16 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description CITY OF . n YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 203499 1565255 5842.5515 203500 1565262 5842.5512 203501 1565263 5842.5515 203502 1565259 5842.5513 203503 1565257 5842.5513 203504 1565261 5842.5513 203505 1565252 5822.5513 203506 1565251 5822.5513 203507 1565249 5822.5513 203508 1565254 5822.5512 203509 1565253 5822.5512 203510 1565250 5822.5512 203511 404232 5842.5513 203512 404578 5842.5513 203513 404785 5842.5513 318303 1115/2009 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 144.95 MOTOR, CAPACITOR 00005409 202992 006639 1470.6406 144.95 318304 1/15/2009 121481 KAPLAN PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS 638.00 DATABASE MODIFICATIONS 203378 8122030 638.00 318305 1/15/2009 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 107.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 107.96 318306 111512009 209.97 199.99 362.32 51.99 222.33 695.91 2,476.72 4,219.23 318307 1115/2009 97.94 97.94 111018 KEEPRS INC. UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 123902 KIM, DANIEL OVERPAYMENT REFUND 203379 010709 1400.4332 1400.6203 1/14,. 8:04:16 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR .50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES FALSE ALARMS - POLICE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 00003778 203406 108273 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00003778 203407 108273 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00003771 203408 108012 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00003793 203409 95918 -04 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00003794 203410 106471 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00003794 203411 106471 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00003770 203412 107389 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 203167 010509 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 16 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318308 1/1512009 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 245.08 LASER MAINTENANCE 203168 378293 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 245.08 318309 1/15/2009 120734 LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY GRO 255.60 CANINE TRACKER 203380 11996 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 255.60 318310 1115/2009 100856 LINHOFF PHOTO 310.00 DIGITAL REPRINTS 203169 110740 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 310.00 318311 1/1512009 116882 LIPPERT, BARBARA 242.45 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 203170 010609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 242.45 318312 1/1512009 101792 LUBE -TECH 829.52 OIL, WASHER FLUID 00001549 202993 1612402 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 829.52 318313 1/15/2009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 567.56 203091 53282 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 567.56 318314 1115/2009 101361 M.IA.M.A. 140.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 00008082 203382 842 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 140.00 318315 1/1512009 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 425.49 MOUNTS 00001499 202994 2090627 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.93 FILLER CAP 00001509 202995 2090693 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.96- CREDIT 203442 7364 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 353.46 318316 1/15/2009 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,846.50 203092 418937 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 913.60 203093 418067 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,060.58 203094 418450 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 60.00- 203171 505 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,920.78 203514 420491 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,681.46 CITY OF L_...A 1/14/ 8:04:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 1/1512009 - 1/1512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No .Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318317 1/1512009 120924 MASTER MECHANICAL INC. 201,900.00 POOL VENTILATION REPLACEMENT 203308 22966 5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 201,900.00 318318 1/1512009 101570 MEMA 30.00 MEMBERSHIP 203381 010508 1460.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CIVILIAN DEFENSE 30.00 318319 111512009 101483 MENARDS 192.40 WIRE, CABLE, BAR CLAMP 00006383 203172 1080 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 65.11 FURRING STRIPS, SPRAY ADHESIVE0006386 203173 1735 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.41 SCREWS, BIT HOLDERS 00001501 203384 4862 1318.6 O6 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 297.92 318320 1115/2009 101987 MENARDS 11.18 TAPE 00002129'203385 52071 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 121.05 VACUUM, LIGHTBULBS 00002321 203386 52848 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 132.23 318321 1115/2009 102281 MENARDS 10.64 SURGE PROTECTOR 00005024 203309 36525 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 10.64 318322 1/1512009 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 27,101.25 DEC 2008 SAC 202996 010209 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 27,101.25 318323 1115/2009 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 344,406.11 SEWER SERVICE 203383 0000889309 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 344,406.11 318324 1/1512009 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 37.81 HOSE ASSEMBLY 00001192 203174 461980FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.81 318325 1/1512009 121053 MILLER, SUSAN 41.93 PETTY CASH 203387 010909 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 75.31 PETTY CASH 203387 010909 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 18.13 PETTY CASH 203388 010809 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 103.22 PETTY CASH 203388 010809 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 238.59 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 18 1/15/2009 — 111512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318326 1115/2009 105483 MINN JUVENILE OFFICERS ASSN 420.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 203391 EDIN001 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 420.00 318327 1/15/2009 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,540.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001334 203175 33328 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,090.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001335 203176 33327 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,630.00 318328 1/15/2009 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 16,159.60 WATER PURCHASED 203177 010509 ' 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 16,159.60 318329 1/15/2009 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 19.81 CARBON DIOXIDE 203178 RI 12080127 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 19.81 318330 1/15/2009 101899 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 100.00 MHMIR FEE 203414 2706000072008M- 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 23358 100.00 318331 1115/2009 120051 MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE 80.00 MAGAZINE LISTING 203389 50694 7413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF FIRE TOWER 80.00 318332 1115/2009 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 1,375.45 HYDRANT PARTS 00001287 203179 0234945 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,653.32 METER BATTERIES 00001326 203180 0235107 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 5,124.51 1-METERS 00001328 203415 0235119 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 8,153.28 318333 1/15/2009 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING CO LLC 343.47 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 203390 010809 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 343.47 318334 1115/2009 102775 MN DNR WATERS 140.00 LAKE WATER USAGE 00001256 203416 1960 -0231 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 140.00 318335 111512— 122793 MODERN MARKETING INC. CITY OF �. A 11141. 8:04:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/15/2009 -- 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,043.01 LIQUID SOAP 203181 MM1061928 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,038.78 LIQUID SOAP 203182 MM1061929 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,081.79 318336 1/15/2009 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 285.00 WEDDING GUIDE AD 00006175 203183 W244787 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 285.00 318337 1115/2009 121143 MTG 2,600.00 STATION #1 CONSTRUCTION 203417 42031 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 2,600.00 318338 1/15/2009 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 2,412.90 FIRE GLOVES 00003788 203413 SO_066912 -2 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,412.90 318339 1115/2009 102592 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSI 10,500.00 2009 DUES 203392 010609 1120.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 10,500.00 318340 111512009 119445 NATIONAL POWER CHAIR INC. 345.00 CHARGERS 00001504 203393 40079 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 345.00 318341 1/15/2009 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 106.56 PLASTICWARE 203312 32693 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 106.56 318342 1/15/2009 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 815.00 203095 53082 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 489.00 203096 53081 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 717.50 203257 53083 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,021.50 318343 1/15/2009 102888 NORTHERN DOOR COMPANY 149.24 TRANSMITTERS 00003797 203418 38232 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.24 318344 1/15/2009 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 575.77 BACKUP LIGHTS, LENS, LIGHTS 00005407 203394 19569 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57577 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 20 1/15/2009 — 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318345 1/15/2009 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 1,610.28 MAGNETIC LOCATOR, SERVICE KITGD001330 203185 S01181728.001 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,610.28 318346 1/1512009 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 84.05 SECRET SHOPPING 203184 2078 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 203184 2078 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 203184 2078 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 254.05 318347 1/15/2009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 32.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00008078 202997 457389830 -001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 29.69 PLANNERS, PAPER 00006034 203186 458154485 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 61.93 318348 1/1512009 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 21.65 LATCH KITS 00001512 202998 534120 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.59 HOIST HOOK 00001512 202999 534119 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 154.70 CABLE ASSEMBLY 00001585 203443 534489 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 285.94 318349 1/15/2009 104303 OLSON, THOMAS 279.37 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203187 010609 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 279.37 318350 1115/2009 102265 OLSON, TIM 59.98, UNIFORM PURCHASE 203444 010909 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 59.98 318351 1/1512009 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 5,500.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 203445 1901 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 5,500.00 318352 1115/2009 117993 P & H SERVICES 75.00 UNIT MAINTENANCE 203188 12973 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 318353 1/15/2009 101718 PARTS PLUS 2,004.79 AUTO PARTS 203189 123106 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,004.79 318354 11151"" 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS R55CKREG LOG20000 ' Check # Date 318355 1115/2009 318357 1/1512009 318358 1/15/2009 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2,207.15 1,006.25 480.75 1,613.00 1,381.75 6,688.90 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY CITY OF . n 11141- 8:04:16 Council Check Register 364.62 Page - 21 47013079 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 203097 8209164 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 203098 8209173 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 203099 8209233 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 203100 8209595 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 203101 8209588 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 364.62 203446 47013079 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 246.52 203447 46208379 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 611.14 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,450.08 203102 2701516 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 203.72 203103 2701517 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,832.69 203104 2698950 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 336.01 203105 2700658 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 506.50 203106 2700660 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 632.50 203218 2700656 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 773.68 203258 2703725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,329.44 203259 2703723 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 98.24 203260 2703724 5862,5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 187.06 203261 2703726 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,075.80 203262 2700959 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 707.19 203263 2700961 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.72 203515 2703722 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 317.98 203516 2703719 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,662.48 203517 2703720 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,777.45 203518 2703718 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 32.49 203519 2700958 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 649.50 203520 2700956 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,075.80 203521 2700957 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,315.19 203522 2703715 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 690.59 203523 2703717 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 24.27 203524 2703716 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 36.97- 203525 3401402 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 806.07 PEST CONTROL 00008086 203448 1228337 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 806.07 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/15/2009 - 1/1512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO #. Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318359 111512009 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 19.06 CO2 CYLINDERS 203313- 31863296 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 19.06 318360 1/15/2009 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Page - 22 Business Unit PSTF FIRE TOWER 216.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008089 203190 239025 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 216.00 318361 1115/2009 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 912.35 203107 165279 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,071.58 203108 164225 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 199.95 203109 166230 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,129.85 203264 167368 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 768.24 203265 168725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.19 203266 168736 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,195.16 318362 1/1512009 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES 127.80 WASHERS, NUTS 00001478 203419 80816 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 127.80 318363 1115/2009 103094 PROTECTION ONE 152.13 ALARM SERVICE 203449 120808 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 152.13 316364 1115/2009 111600 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER INC. 384.07 MAGLIGHT BATTERIES 203314 1702581N 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 384.07 318365 1/15/2009 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,575.00 203110 106837 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,505.65 203111 106865 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,513.67 203112 104774 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 739.22 203113 104824 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 45.60 203114 106430 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,048.83 203115 106602 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 609.70 203116 105852 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,280.81 203117 102733 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,272.00 203118 105195 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,705.00 203119 105117 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 839.80 203120 106672 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.60 203267 106428 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1/14. 8:04:16 CITY OF. R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 1/15/2009 -- 1/1512009 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Check # Date 203268 104823 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,254.50 203269 104773 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,545.76 203270 106567 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,252.48 203271 105809 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 859.00 203272 106429 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 788.00 203273 106651 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 533.00 203274 104772 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,265.72 203275 104822 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,328.10 38,027.44 318366 1/15/2009 123898 QWEST 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.04 952 922 -9246 203191 9246 -12/08 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 17.76 651281-1355 B001311 203450 1311 -1/09 1400.6188 DISTRIBUTION 51.64 952 926 -0092 203451 0092 -1/09 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 500.18 612 E24 -8657 203452 8657- 1/09 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 203453 8656 -1109 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 280.94 612 E24 -8656 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 967.00 612 E01 -0426 203454 0426 -1/09 1550.6188 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 86.48 952 926 -0419 203455 0419 -1/09 1646.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 499.65 612 E01 -8392 203456 8392 -1/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 203457 0146 -12/08 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 55.41 203457 0146 -12/08 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 58.10 203457 0146 -12/08 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 83.41 203457 0146 -12108 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 97.02 203457 0146 -12/08 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 102.46 203457 0146 -12/08 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 115.36 203457 0146-12/08 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 161.90 203457 0146 -12108 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 165.61 203457 0146 -12/08 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 233.16 203457 0146 -12/08 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 264.75 203457 0146 -12/08 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 292.19 203457 0146 -12108 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,094.83 6;167.89 318367 1/15/2009 100149 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 178.62 CLEANER 00006390 203192 038584243 5422.6406 178.62 318368 1/1512009 106358 RESIDENCE INN GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW &ICE REMOVAL 62.80 LODGING FOR SNOWPLOWER 00001605 203458 00003062 1318.6406 62.80 318369 1/15/2009 1115946 RICHFIELD SYMPHONIC BAND R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/15/2009 — 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 125.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 203334 010909 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 318370 1/15/2009 102407 RICHFIELD TRANSMISSION 2,718.98 TRANSMISSION REPAIRS 00001557 203000 003117 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,718.98 318371 1/15/2009 120457 RSC EQUIPMENT RENTAL 358.06 LIFT PARTS 203315 39717038 -001 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 358.06 318372 1/15/2009 123912 RUFLEDT, BRIDGETTE 29.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 203396 011209 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 48.95 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 203437 JAN1209 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 78.79 318373 1/15/2009 119655 RUPP, GAYLE 15.00 PROGRAM REFUND 203459 010709 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 318374 1115/2009 102491 S.O.T.A. 1,175.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 203461 15381685 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,175.00 318375 1/1512009 104087 SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS INC. 1,880.20 SAFETY TRAINING 203460. 140 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 1,880.20 SAFETY TRAINING 203460 140 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 4,297.60 SAFETY TRAINING 203460 140 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 8,058.00 318376 1/15/2009 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 112.41 CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER 00001596 203193 MB02518121 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.41 318377 1/15/2009 100997 SESAC INC. 168.50 MUSIC LICENSE 203462 2932613 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 536.00 MUSIC LICENSE 00002318 203463 2948629 5631.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 704.50 318378 1/1512009 103249 SHANNON, JIM 110.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 203335 010909 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 110.00 CITY OF 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/15/2009 - 1/1512009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation _ 318379 111512009 116501 SIMONSON, JUSTIN 1646.6201 LAUNDRY HASE 203464 010709 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5610.6136 1646.6406 318386 111512009 121357 STARK, 203198 KS_EDINA_013 5410.6103 1114/" 1:04:16 Page 25 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTINGENCIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90.00 WEBSITE GRAPHIC 203.98 2009 UNIFORM PURC 203.98 101000 SIR SPEEDY 101015 STREICHERS 318380 111512009 1400.6215 203194 59251 MAP LIGHTS 203196 58.31 BUSINESS CARDS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 229.98 REPLACE SIREN SWITCH BOX 58.31 1582970 1400.6215 318381 111512009 123905 SNIPERCRAFT INC. 203465 122908 1470.6180 550.00 SKILLS AND TACTICS 550.00 1,629.37 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 318382 111512009 203316 5863 -23 318388 111512009 2,852.81 70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 1553.6180 988.17 2,852.81 988.17 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 318383 111512009 00001170 203195 S168861 88.29 CAPS 88.29 102193 STAN BANN BIG BAND 318384 111512009 203331 010909 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 100.00 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 318385 1115/2009 203001 MN 496947 38.76 KEYS 38.76 KRISTI 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5610.6136 1646.6406 318386 111512009 121357 STARK, 203198 KS_EDINA_013 5410.6103 1114/" 1:04:16 Page 25 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTINGENCIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90.00 WEBSITE GRAPHIC 90.00 1/1512009 101015 STREICHERS 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 318387 MAP LIGHTS 203196 1581669 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 229.98 REPLACE SIREN SWITCH BOX 203197 1582970 1400.6215 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 647.51 203420 1582950 1470.6180 751.88 5 -72 INSTALLATION 1,629.37 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 318388 111512009 00001548 203002 CTCS548615 1553.6180 988.17 .. VEHICLE REPAIRS 988.17 BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page - 26 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318389 1/15/2009 114800 SUPERIOR WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT 9,500.00 DEER REMOVAL 00005989 203317 108 1509.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEER CONTROL 9,500.00 318390 1/15/2009 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 28.38 PHONE CHARGER 00001587 203199 23407 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 35.00 PHONE REPLACEMENT 203466 23424 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 PHONE REPAIR 00001587 203467 23426 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 98.38 318391 1/15/2009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 442.00 203121 JM6822 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 442.00 318392 1/15/2009 119637 SWEENEY, J. SHAWN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 203332 010909 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 318393 1115/2009 120595 T- MOBILE 41.63 477067848 203318 122708 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 41.63 318394 1115/2009 117686 TECHNAGRAPHICS 351.76 ORDINANCE FEE (ALARMS) 203200 9100011 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 351.94 ALARM RESPONSE NOTIFICATIONS 203201 9101011 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 176.24 PARKING REG ADVISES 203202 9115011 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 879.94 318395 1/15/2009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,355.00 203526 524490 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 142.90 203527 524491 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,497.90 318396 1/15/2009 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 376.23 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 00008087 203468 840264 5510.6105 DUES 8, SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 63.60 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 203469 822236 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 439.83 318397 1/15/2009 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 253.75 DRAFT MINUTES 17/16/08 203003 M16737 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 253.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF _...A Council Check Register 1/15/2009 — 1115/2009 1/14,_ 8:04:16 Page- 27 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318398 1/15/2009 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 6,438.47 WATERMAIN LINING PROJECT 203319 000200804676 05479.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT WM -479 M'SIDE H2OMAIN EXC/PREP 12.85 LIFT STATIONS 21 & 22 203320 000200804669 10037.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT LS37 LS REHAB @ WALNUT DRIVE 1,330.08 POND DREDGING PROJECT 203321 000200804666 04357.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN STS -357 STORMWATER DREDGING 5,199.12 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 203421 000200804686 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 55,329.82 BRIDGE REPAIR 203422 000200804688 10091.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge 68,310.34 318399 1/1512009 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 46.35 WELDING GAS 00001591 203004 473015 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 374.51 WELDING TIPS, FILTER 00001030 203005 248345 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.88 WELDING SUPPLIES 203203 470987 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 37.08 WELDING SUPPLIES 203204 473016 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 493.82 318400 1/15/2009 123910 TRAINOR, FLORENCE 27.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 203470 123008 1628.4392.01 SR CENTER MEMBERSHIP SENIOR CITIZENS 27.00 318401 111512009 102705 TREE TRUST 41.31 PROJECT MATERIALS 203322 8240A 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 41.31 318402 1/15/2009 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 108,344.97 TRUCK BODY 00005295 203006 44314 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 85,644.11 TRUCK BODY 00005295 203007 44313 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 193,989.08 318403 1/1512009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 207.16 FLAG STICKS, CUPS 203205 S116813 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 207.16 318404 1115/2009 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 1,292.80 GARAGE DOOR PARTS 00001502 203008 307971 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 115.33 DOOR REPAIR 00002317 203206 307650 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,408.13 318405 1115/2009 115379 U.S. BANK 70.48 MEETING EXPENSE 203323 010509 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 16.90 NET ZERO 203324 JAN052009 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 78.20 PAYPAL INTERNET 203324 JAN052009 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Council Check Register Page- 28 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 165.58 318406 1/15/2009 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 3,835.21 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203325 123108 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,835.21 318407 1/15/2009 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 23.29 WALLPLATES, SCREWS 00001477 203009 697578 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 23.29 318408 1/15/2009 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 1,952.86 BLADES, SAW 00001475 203010 78777979 -001 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,767.91 COMPRESSOR, GENERATOR. 00001291 203011 78777787 -001 1301.6556 - TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,018.18 VIB PLATE RENTAL 00001353 203012 78777655 -001 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.14- RETURN 00001043 203013 77851105 -002 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5,670.81 318409 1115/2009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 170.00 BLDG OFFICIALS SEMINAR 203423 010709 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 170.00 318410 1/15/2009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 50.00 BICYCLE/PED TOOLBOX TRAINING 203473 010909 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 50.00 318411 1/15/2009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 115.00 EROSION RECERTIFICATION 203474 010509 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 115.00 318412 1/15/2009 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 30.45 SHIPPING 203207 MME77T1200JOS 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.45 318413 1/15/2009 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 162.88 ICE MELT, CLEANER. 203208 123108 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 728.10 FOOD 203208 123108 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 890.98 318414 1/15/2009 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 11.26 PAGERS 203475 S0317425A 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 22.52 PAGERS _ 203475 S0317425A " 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.59 PAGERS 203475 S0317425A 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF _...A Council Check Register 1/15/2009 -- 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1208 PAGER 203476 S6096083A 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 4607.6406 4607.6406 4607.6406 1470.6510 1470.6510 1470.6510 5842.6512 5842.6512 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 1/141- - 8:04:16 Page - 29 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 68.45 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 318415 1/1512009 01342.1705.20 119476 USPCA REGION 12 BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 120.00 NARCOTIC TESTING 203471 010508 120.00 318416 1/1512009 119476 USPCA REGION 12 40.00 USPCA DUES 203472 010709 40.00 MEMBERSHIP - KEVIN ROFIDAL 203472 010709 80.00 318417 1/1512009 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 221.92 OXYGEN 00003649 203424 238279 113.96 OXYGEN 00003649 203425 848514 220.61 OXYGEN 00003649 203426 240629 556.49 318418 1/1512009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 664.59 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 203477 107526 -00 149.14 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 203478 107526 -01 813.73 318419 1/15/2009 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 118.64 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 00001479 203014 3369454 118.64 318420 1/15/2009 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 1,946.00 203122 25842 1,946.00 318421 111512009 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 1,137.50 203276 12481 1,137.50 318422 111512009 123903 VISTA CONCEPTS 498.92 SPRINKLER REPAIR 203326 123108 498.92 318423 1/15/2009 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 593.70 FOOD 00002320 203479 24653673 593.70 4607.6406 4607.6406 4607.6406 1470.6510 1470.6510 1470.6510 5842.6512 5842.6512 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 1/141- - 8:04:16 Page - 29 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005463 203327 CITY OF EDINA 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 238.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR- Council Check Register 010735 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 1,356.00 1/1512009 - 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318424 1/15/2009 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 17.06 ELECTION JUDGE 203428 12.60 LIGHTING 00001377 203480 15119129 -01 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.06 12.60 318425 1/15/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. 503.16 HOSE MONSTER 00003781 203427 80848 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 503.17 HOSE MONSTER 00003781 203427 80848 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 209242 -00 5842.5513 1,006.33 YORK SELLING 1,064.40 318426 1/15/2009 5842.5513 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN YORK SELLING 736.50 1/14/2009 8:04:16 Page- 30 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,975.66 REFUSE 1 203015 - 484610322824 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,975.66 318427 1/15/2009 123431 WATER WIZARD IRRIGATION 1,118.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005463 203327 010736 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 238.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR- 00005430 203328 010735 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 1,356.00 318428 1/1512009 116982 WILEY, ELIZABETH 17.06 ELECTION JUDGE 203428 010809 1180.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES ELECTION 17.06 318429 1/15/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 823.55 203123 209622 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,644.75 203124 209242 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,064.40 203277 209552 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 736.50 203528 209789 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,269.20 318430 1/15/2009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 281.12 203125 258234 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 113.12 203126 258233 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 40.00 203127 258299 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 64.50- 203128 41674 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16.50- 203129 41673 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,855.23 203278 259109 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 599.84 203279 259106 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,017.73 203529 259108 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 233.12 203530 259107 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,059.16 CITY OF . , 1/14)- 8:0416 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 1/1512009 - 1115/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318431 1/1512009 123907 WISCONSIN APCO 300.00 APCO CONFERENCE 203481 010709 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 318432 1115/2009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 680.30 203130 222645 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 361.95 203131 222647 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 519.20 203132 222988 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 482.45 203133 222569 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,003.70 203134 222983 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,368.75 203135 222818 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,416.35 318433 1/15/2009 123911 WRAP CITY GRAPHICS 63.90 PRICE SIGNS UPDATE 00006177 203482 9002 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 63.90 318434 1/1512009 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 882.00 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 203429 5- 01686 -130 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,938.00 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 203430 18- 01686 -030 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,457.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 203431 17- 01686 -020 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,321.00 70TH ST ROUNDABOUTS 203432 22- 01686 -050 01336.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 6,598.00 318435 1115/2009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 398.56 51- 6046826 -0 203016 179842032 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 111.65 51- 5634814 -2 203017 179835185 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 102.50 514156445 -0 203018 179809273 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 135.40 51- 5938955 -6 203019 179837142 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 188.57 51- 6229265 -9 203020 179847493 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,026.93 51- 6229265 -9 203020 179847493 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 190.18 514827232 -6 203021 179979358 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 221.83 51- 6137136 -8 203022 180009197 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,021.20 51- 6979948 -4 203023 180028497 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,245.99 51- 69799484 203023 180028497 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,729.85 51- 69799484 203023 180028497 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 4,527.06 514966303 -6 203024 179983386 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,635.98 51- 6121102 -5 203209 180332814 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,205.74 51- 5847121 -5 203433 180333061 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 1,343.58 51- 6840050 -6 203434 180679062 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 4,099.08 51- 6121102 -5 203435 180495539 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,132.07 51- 6824328 -7 203436 180677308 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/15/2009 — 1/15/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 26,316.17 318436 1/15/2009 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 148.50 DEC USAGE - PK & REC 00004322 203025 037666058 1550.6151 49.36 COPIER USAGE 203210 037666230 1628.6103 197.86 318437 1/1512009 103584 XPEDX 1,990.94 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004149 203211 N344730611 2210.6123 1,990.94 318438 1/15/2009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 127.60 SENSOR, RING 00001443 203212 PC001119412 1553.6530 345.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 203483 E3809758 1551.6180 472.60 1,468,633.17 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,468,633.17 Total Payments 1,468,633.17 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1114/2009 8:04:16 Page - 32 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 385,992.64 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 11,774.99 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 32,572.14 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 55,465.82 05100 ART CENTER FUND 342.55 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 290.18 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 8,628.52 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 3,874.92 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 222,772.25 05800 LIQUOR FUND 297,769.44 05900 UTILITY FUND 409,744.79 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,808.98 05950 RECYCLING FUND 35,380.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,215.95 Report Totals 1,468,633.17 CITY OF L Council Check Summary 1/15/2009 - 1/15/2009 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief. that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll ies and procedures d� 1114. x:06:22 Page - 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/26/08-12/26/08 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/11/26 $57.90 SOCKS TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 5601.5510 JOHN KEPRIOS. 2008/12/01 $8.20 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM PARTY AMERICA 1009 MINNETONKA MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/01 $24.30 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM MICHAELS #3739 BLOOMINGTON MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/02 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5610.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/03 $317.36 BIRTHDAY PARTY SUPPLIES WINDY CITY NOVELTIES 800 - 4463200 IL 5610.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/08 $30.81 PARK PROGRAM DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1622.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/08 $70.75 PARK SUPPLIES ONLY TRAINS /CARRERA SU BUFFALO MN 5620.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/10 $29.36 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES RENTAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5610.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/10 $387.05 SKATEAID NICERINK 262- 2796000 WI 5630.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/12/12 $13.90 COOLING RACK AMZ`AMAZON PAYMENTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 5630.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2008/11/27 $799.34 LOCK BOXES REAL ESTATE SUPERCENTI713- 722 -7372 TX 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/01 $59.85 DVD DISKS BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/03 $24.58 DVD DISKS MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARk MN 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/04 $400.39 SQUAD RIFLE PROJECT C PRODUCTS LLC 860- 953 -5007 CT 1400.6710 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/04 $106.32 PRINTER INK BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/05 $104.18 AUTO ADAPTER ONI *PC OFFICENATION 847 - 504 -3000 IL 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/05 $17.70 GLASS CLEANING SUPPLIES PAYPAL "DEALEXTREME 4029357733 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/05 $191.47 COMPUTER SUPPLIES NATIONAL PRODUCTS INC. 206 - 7638361 WA 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/06 $427.56 DIGITAL CAMERAS BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1400.6710 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/08 $94.15 COMPUTER SUPPLIES A2Z MOBILE SOLUTIONS 304 - 2968800 WV 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/12 $92.54 COMPUTER CABLES CABLES TO GO 800 - 287 -2843 OH 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008112/17 $27.80 GUN REPAIRS GLOCK INC 770 - 319 -4794 GA 1400.6104 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/18 $71.57 INVESTIGATIONS SUPPLIES MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/19 $42.75 GPS CHARGER MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2008/12/22 $483.72 LUNCHEON - $420 REIMBURSED VESCIO'S ST. LOUIS 952 - 920 -0733 MN 1400.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2008/11/27 $35.00 MEMBERSHIP URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 202 - 624 -7076 DC 1140.6105 JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/01 $199.00 SEMINAR KRM INFORMATION SERVIC EAU CLAIRE WI 1120.6103 JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/01 $95.40 WORKSHOP MEAL ARBYS CATER DELPHIS 559 - 222 -1437 CA 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/08 $73.15 WORKSHOP MEAL PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/08 $205.80 EDINA 16 SUPPLIES B & H PHOTO- VIDEO.COM 999 - 9999999 NY 2210.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/09 $45.15 HEALTH SUPPLIES SANITATION STRATEGIES, 1877- 4944364 MI 1490.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/09 $30.00 HEALTH SUPPLIES JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/09 $94.29 HEALTH SUPPLIES JOHN WALLIN 2008/12/16 $262.23 WORKSHOP MEAL $5,023.57 BAILEY'S TEST STRIPS & TF- 201 - 343 -8004 NJ THERMOWORKS, INC. 801- 7567705 UT PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material- respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici an procedures date anager 1490.6406 1490.6406 1100.6106 REPO RURECOM MEN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VLB From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: January 20, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Capital Improvement Action ® Motion Program ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Capital Improvement Program for 2009 — 2013. Info /Background: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for calendar years 2009 — 2013 will be discussed. The CIP was discussed with the City Council at several workshops for utility and public works and enterprise business plans. Attached are revised pages 9 -22 and 141 -174 of the 2009 proposed CIP. You may discard the old pages and replace them with these revised versions. Pages 175 & 176 are now eliminated due to project consolidation (UT -09 -001) and deferral (UT -08 -013). The revisions are mostly to update the public works and utility sections for changes in some projects and estimates since the original proposed CIP was distributed. This proposed CIP will be posted on the internet for public review Please bring your revised copy of the proposed 2009 CIP to the Council meeting on Tuesday. A, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA O� a t O CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Construction Fund Unreserved Fund Balance Expenditures General Government Estimate Budget 110,000 Forecast 110,000 110,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Revenues Public Safety 50,000 35,000 40,000 - - I nte rgovem mental $ 1,664,440 $ 1,134,000 $ 2,382,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,546,000 $ 1,130,000 Special Assessment 3,101,944 446,757 439,856 363,044 327,034 252,780 Interest (4.5%) 263,399 377,140 210,934 195,534 193,580 179,883 Total Revenues 5,029,783 1,957,897 3,032,790 2,058,578 2,066,614 1,562,663 Expenditures General Government 585,000 22,035,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Park & Rec 544,800 595,000 715,000 600,000 630,000 530,000 Public Safety 50,000 35,000 40,000 - - - Public Works 8,792,800 6,454,000 7,432,000 7,560,000 7,370,000 6,950,000 Total Expenditures 9,972,600 29,119,000 8,297,000 8,270,000 8,110,000 7,590,000 Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Transfers In /(Out) 200,000 (106,000) (18,000) (92,000) (960,000) (1,987,000) CIP Bonds - 22,000,000 - - - - FIR Bonds 7,270,380 1,573,630 4,940,000 6,010,000 5,774,000 5,770,000 Unidentified Funding - - 250,000 925,000 2,020,000 Total Other Sources 7,470,380 23,467,630 4,922,000 6,168,000 5,739,000 5,803,000 Increase (Decrease) $ 2,527,563 $ (3,693,473) $ (342,210) $ (43,422) $ (304,386) $ (224,337) Beginning Balance $ 5,853,322 $ 8,380,885 $ 4,687,412 $ 4,345,202 $ 4,301,780 $ 3,997,394 Ending Balance $ 8,380,885 $ 4,687,412 $ 4,345,202 $ 4,301,780 $ 3,997,394 $ 3,773,057 Construction Fund Unreserved Balance Trend $14,000,000 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Actual) and Next Five Fiscal Years (Estimate) $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20131 The charts above show the projected impact this CIP will have on the Construction Fund along with a ten -year history of Construction Fund balances. The 2002 balance was abnormally high due to a bond issue for City Hall, the majority of which wasn't spent until 2003. Page 9 0 n; O CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND CASH BALANCES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Enterprise Fund Cash Balances Cash - December 31 $ 1,148,319 $ 593,637 $ 18,490 $ 113,665 $ 228,989 $ 365,956 Arena Estimate Budget 2010 Plan 2013 2013 Aquatic Center 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Cash - January 1 $ 960,538 $ 1,148,319 $ 593,637 $ 18,490 $ 113,665 $ 228,989 Operating Income 157,108 50,071 15,055 85,146 94,256 103,992 CIP Expenditures - (640,000) (640,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - - - - - - Other Miscellaneous e 30,673 _ _ 35,247 49,798 60,029 71,068 82,975 Cash - December 31 $ 1,148,319 $ 593,637 $ 18,490 $ 113,665 $ 228,989 $ 365,956 Arena 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2013 Cash - January 1 $ 93,949 $ 83,467 $ 27,266 $ 448,695 $ 118,380 $ 36,096 Operating Income (177,006) (227,038) (238,171) (249,803) (261,957) (274,655) CIP Expenditures (75,000) (131,000) (1,650,000) (250,000) (25,000) (155,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) 155,000 211,000 80,000 80,000 105,000 235,000 Other Miscellaneous s 86,524 90,837 2,229,600 89,488 99,673 110,163 Cash - December 31 $ 83,467 $ 27,266 $ 448,695 $ (118,380 $ 36,096 $ (48,396) Art Center 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2013 Cash - January 1 $ 56,162 $ 68,740 $ 62,035 $ 53,873 $ 49,333 $ 43,501 Operating Income (167,422) (197,705) (199,722) (201,682) (203,580) (205,409) CIP Expenditures (25,000) (25,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (870,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) 160,000 170,000 155,000 160,000 160,000 155,000 Other Miscellaneous a 45,000 46,000 46,560 47,142 47,748 918,378 Cash - December 31 $ 68,740 $ 62,035 $ 53,873 $ 49,333 $ 43,501 $ 41,470 Page 10 A.1►7r CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o� e r �p ENTERPRISE FUND CASH BALANCES • h °Y.urtYis�a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Enterprise Fund Cash Balances Cash - December 31 $ 3,436,388 $ 2,536,190 $ 2,112,575 $ 1,899,120 $ 1,903,281 $ 1,882,775 Golf Course 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2013 Cash - January l $(1,133,538) $(1,080,739) $(1,106,766) $ (860,298) $ (611,955) $ (279,450) Operating Income Estimate Budget 224,209 Plan 250,505 Edinborough/Centennial 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2013 Cash - January 1 $ 4,185,149 $ 3,436,388 $ 2,536,190 $ 2,112,575 $ 1,899,120 $ 1,903,281 Operating Income (458,761) (655,698) (635,313) (663,721) (693,355) (724,266) CIP Expenditures (572,000) (739,500) (318,000) (152,000) (330,000) (152,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - 250,000. 318,000 152,000 330,000 152,000 Other Miscellaneous a 282,000 245,000 211,698 450,266 697,516 703,760 Cash - December 31 $ 3,436,388 $ 2,536,190 $ 2,112,575 $ 1,899,120 $ 1,903,281 $ 1,882,775 Golf Course 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2013 Cash - January l $(1,133,538) $(1,080,739) $(1,106,766) $ (860,298) $ (611,955) $ (279,450) Operating Income 180,146 211,887 224,209 237,075 250,505 264,519 CIP Expenditures (126,504) (253,000) • (260,000) (265,000) (620,000) (845,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) 170,000 170,000 150,000 125,000 100,000 75,000 Other Miscellaneous a (170,843) (154,914) 132,259 151,268 602,000 851,158 Cash - December 31 $(1,080,739) $(1,106,766 ) $ 860,298 $ (611,955 ) $ (279,450) $ 66,227 Liquor Stores 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2013 Cash - January l $ 1,121,149 $ 781,444 $ 452,359 $ 275,380 $ 299,328 $ 119,400 Operating Income 947,371 1,046,625 1,124,015 1,206,182 1,293,396 1,385,945 CIP Expenditures (95,000) (156,000) (95,000) - (320,000) (20,000) Transfer Cashln /(Out) (1,277,800) (1,310,100) (1,300,000) (1,280,000) (1,255,000) (1,235,000) Other Miscellaneous a 85,724 90,390 94,006 97,766 101,676 105,744 Cash - December 31 $ 781,444 $ 452,359 $ 275,380 $ 299,328 $ 119,400 $ 356,089 a. Other miscellaneous adjustments include nonoperating income and losses. Other miscellaneous adjustments also include differences between the full accrual basis of accounting used for enterprise funds under generally accepted accounting procedures (GAAP) and the cash basis of accounting used here to provide useful projections. Other miscellaneous adjustments may include investment income, bond proceeds and payments, depreciation, and other items. Page 11 This page left bank intentionally. Page 12 City of Edina, MN Capital Improvement Program 2009 thru 2013 PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Aquatic Center Flowrider AQC -03 -0101 n/a 600,000 600,000 250,000 25,000 1,200,000 Upgrades and Replacements AQC -09 -001 n/a 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 230,000 Aquatic Center Total Parking Lot Expansion 640,000 640,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,430,000 70,000 70,000 Building Expansion ART -07 -002 n/a 800,000 800,000 Replace Phone System Arena Replace Zamboni A -00 -006 n/a 105,000 15,000 105,000 Refurbish West Arena A -04 -001 n/a 10,000 1,200,000 10,000 1,200,000 Dehumidification System A -07 -002 n/a 25,000 150,000 150,000 10,000 300,000 Truck with Plow A -08 -003 n/a 26,000 26,000 Parking Lot Repair A -08 -004 n/a BD -06-001 100,000 35,000 100,000 Install Underground Irrigation A -08 -005 n/a Building Inspections Total 100,000 35,000 100,000 Building Fagade A -08 -006 n/a 35,000 100,000 100,000 Replace Building Skate Tile A -08 -007 n/a 100,000 CW -02 -001 100,000 Repairs & Maintenance A -09 -001 n/a 75,000 75,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 Replace Zamboni A -09 -002 n/a 75,000 75,000 75,000 130,000 130,000 Arena Total 131,000 1,650,000 250,000 25,000 155,000 2,211,000 Art Center Parking Lot Expansion ART -01 -001 n/a 70,000 70,000 Building Expansion ART -07 -002 n/a 800,000 800,000 Replace Phone System ART -08 -001 nla 15,000 15,000 Repairs & Maintenance ART -09 -001 n/a 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 Art Center Total 25,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 870,000 925,000 IBuilding Inspections Complaint Administration Software BD -06-001 n/a 35,000 35,000 Building Inspections Total 35,000 35,000 JCitywide Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling CW -02 -001 2 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Citywide Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Edinborou h /Centennial EP Replaster Pool ECL -00 -0 17 n/a 70,000 70,000 CL Park Storage Building ECL -03 -008 n/a 15,000 15,000 CL Replace Utility Vehicle ECL -04 -004 n/a 12,000 12,000 CL Bridge to Clubhouse ECL -04 -005 n/a 40,000 40,000 Page 13 Department Project# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total CL Fountain ECL -04 -006 n/a 8,000 318,000 152,000 8,000 CL Paver Replacement ECL -06 -004 n/a 40,000 40,000 CL Replace HVAC Units ECL -06 -005 n/a 22,000 GC -00-011 22,000 EP Theater Curtain and Rigging ECL -06 -006 n/a 50,000 14,000 14,000 EP Replace Carpeting ECL -06 -007 n/a 75,000 75,000 12,000 12,000 CL Paint Amphitheater Structure ECL -07 -003 n/a n/a 16,000 16,000 CL Signage improvement ECL -07 -004 n/a Braemar: Maintenance Equipment GC -09 -001 20,000 20,000 EP Adventure Peak Renovation ECL -07 -006 n/a 155,000 745,000 25,000 25,000 EP Floor Scrubber ECL -07 -007 n/a 40,000 40,000 7,000 7,000 EP Replace Gym Curtain ECL -07 -008 n/a 8,000 8,000 CL Paint South Park Railings ECL -08 -003 n/a 28,000 18,000 CL Renovate Putting Greens ECL -08 -004 n/a 40,000 40,000 CL Replace CrackedBroken Concr ete ECL -08 -005 n/a 12,000 11,000 EP Security Camera System ECL -08 -007 n/a 12,000 11,000 EP Concrete - Main Entrance ECL -08 -008 n/a 25,000 25,000 EP Torrent Floor Machine ECL -08 -009 n/a 8,000 8,000 EP Soft Play for Great Hall ECL -08 -011 n/a 30,000 30,000 EP Convert Kitchen to Restrooms ECL -08 -012 n/a 60,000 60,000 . EP Office Security Cameras ECL -08 -015 n/a 20,000 20,000 EP Park Sound System ECL -08 -016 n1a 25,000 15,000 EP Water Heater & Holding Tanks ECL -08 -017 n/a 24,000 24,000 EP HVAC Rooftop Units ECL -08 -018 n/a 500,000 500,000 EP Weight & Aerobic Equipment ECL -08 -019 n/a 6,000 6,000 EP Pool and Wall Tile ECL -08 -021 n/a 80,000 80,000 CL Centrum Building Counter Remodel ECL -09 -001 n/a 8,500 8,500 CL Replace Walkway Lights ECL -09 -002 n/a 10,000 10,000 CL Replace Ice Resurfacer ECL -09 -003 n/a 10,000 10,000 CL Amphitheater Speakers ECL -09 -004 n/a 14,000 14,000 CL Centrum Planter Beds ECL - 09,005 n/a 16,000 16,000 CL Centrum Fountain Remodel ECL -09 -006 n/a 30,000 30,000 CL Add Restroom Facility ECL -09 -007 n/a 120,000 120,000 CL Replace Park Sound System ECL -09 -008 n/a - 32,000 32,000 CL Replace Concrete ECL -09 -009 n/a 15,000 15,000 EP Theater Floor ECL -09 -011 n/a 22,000 22,000 EP Exterior Arch Brickwork ECL -09 -012 n/a 20,000 20,000 EP Outdoor Storage Shed ECL -09 -013 n/a 15,000 15,000 EP Lift to Birthday Party Area ECL -09 -0 14 n/a 45,000 45,000 EP Track Floor ECL -09 -015 n/a 35,000 35,000 EP Parking Ramp Concrete & Drain Tile ECL - 09,016 n/a 28,000 28,000 EP Used Scissors Lift ECL -09 -017 n/a 9,000 9,000 EP Cul- de-sac Sidewalk Replacement ECL -09 -018 n/a 25,000 15,000 EP Portable Concession Stand ECL -09 -019 n/a 25,000 15,000 EP Upper Commons Seating Area ECL -09 -020 n/a 8,000 8,000 EP Adventure Peak Remodel ECL -09 -021 n/a 25,000 25,000 EdinborougWCentennial Total 739,500 318,000 152,000 330,000 152,000 1,691,500 Golf Course Braemar. Expand Cart Storage GC -00-011 n/a 50,000 50,000 Braemar & Braemar Exec: Parking Lot Resurfacing GC -06 -001 n/a 75,000 75,000 75,000 215,000 Braemar. Replacement Irrigation System Phase I GC -07 -004 n/a 600,000 600,000 Braemar: Maintenance Equipment GC -09 -001 n/a 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 155,000 745,000 Braemar: Miscellaneous Equipment GC -09.002 n/a 38,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 198,000 Dome: Upgrade Building / Restrooms GD -08 -001 n/a 425,000 425,000 Page 14 Department Project# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Golf Course Total 253,000 260,000 265,000 620,000 845,000 2,243,000 Li uor Stores- 50th: Replace 2 Compressors L/Q -01 -002 n/a 16,000 16,000 York: Enclose Loading Dods L/Q -02 -002 n/a 140,000 140,000 50th: Store Remodel L /Q -02 -005 n/a 95,000 95,000 York: Store Remodel L /Q -09 -002 n/a 320,000 320,000 50th: Replace Entrance Door L/Q -09 -003 n/a 20,000 20,000 Liquor Stores Total 156,000 95,000 320,000 20,000 591,000 Munici al Buildings Public Works Building MB -04 -001 n/a 22,000,000 22,000,000 City Hall/Public Works Building MB -09 -001 n/a 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 . Municipal Buildings Total 22,035,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 1Z 175,000 Park & Recreation Pamela Park: Renovate senior athletic field PK -00 -033 n/a 330,000 330,000 Pamela Park: Playground PK -00 -039 n/a 150,000 150,000 Chowen Park: Playground PK -02 -041 n/a 120,000 120,000 Pamela Park: Batting /pitching cages PK -04 -001 n/a 30,000 30,000 Walnut Ridge Park: Hockey rink relocation PK -04 -003 n/a 90,000 90,000 Todd Park: Pathway renovation PK -05 -009 n/a 45,000 45,000 Arneson Acres Park: Window replacement PK -07 -002 n/a 20,000 20,000 Pamela Park: New athletic field with lights PK -07 -004 n/a 400,000 400,000 Lewis Park: Pathway lighting PK -08 -006 n/a 30,000 30,000 Normandale Park: Rebuild tennis courts PK -09 -001 n/a 55,000 55,000 Bredesen Park: Pathway renovations PK -09 -002 n/a 250,000 250,000 500,000 Highlands Park: Parking lot renovation PK -09 -003 n/a 50,000 50,000 Pamela Park: West parking lot/entrance renovation PK -09 -004 n/a 150,000 150,000 Natural resources inventory assessment PK -09 -005 n/a 50,000 50,000 100,000 Garden Park: Parking lot renovation PK -09 -006 n/a 250,000 250,000 Countryside Park: Master plan development PK -09 -007 n/a 500,000 500,000 Pamela Park: Park shelter Improvements PK -09 -008 n/a 220,000 220,000 Pamela Park: Softball pitching tunnel & scoreboard PK -09 -009 n/a 30,000 30,000 Park & Recreation Total 595,000 715,000 600,000 630,000 530,000 3,070,000 Public Safety Outdoor Warning System PS -02 -004 n/a 40,000 40,000 Public Safety Total 40,000 40,000 Public Works Mill & Overlay: Benton Ave. (Hansen - Hwy 100) PW -00-004 n/a 180,000 180,000 Reconstruct 44th Ave. (TH 100 - France) PW -00 -011 n/a 900,000 900,000 Concrete Rehab: Tracy Ave. (Vernon - TH62) PW -00 -015 n/a 600,000 600,000 Reconstruct: W. 70th St. (TH100 -France) PW -00 -017 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Bridge: 56th Street Bridge PW -00 -029 n/a 250,000 250,000 Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00.074 n/a 450,000 450,000 Reconstruct W 62nd SL (Oaklawn - France) PW -01 -011 n/a 520,000 520,000 Reconstruct: W 54th SL (Wooddale to France) PW -01 -011 n/a 850,000 850,000 Page 15 Department Project# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Mill & Overlay: Blake Rd (Vernon to Interlachen) PW -03.003 n/a 319,000 7,432,000 7,560,000 7,370,000 6,950,000 319,000 Reconstruct W 58th St (Wooddale to France) PW -04 -001 n/a 900,000 900,000 Bridge: 54th Street Bridge PW -05 -003 n/a 3,553,000 400,000 400,000 Northeast Edina Traffic Calming PW -07 -004 n/a 115,000 82,000 197,000 Braemar Cold Storage - Fire Suppression PW -08.004 n/a 70,000 70,000 Skid Steer PW -08.005 n/a 60,000 160,000 60,000 Reconstruct / Sidewalk: VV Rd at Braemar Blvd PW -08 -006 n/a 700,000 700,000 Neighborhood Street Recon. Program PW -09.001 n/a 5,200,000 4,440,000 5,830,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 26,470,000 Sidewalks/Pathways (MSA) PW -09 -002 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Sidewalks/Pathways: City Costs PW -09 -003 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Mill & Overlay: W 69th St (France to York) PW -09 -004 n/a 120,000 550,000 550,000 Sidewalk: France Ave (48 to 49) PW -09 -005 n/a 250,000 100,000 250,000 Mill and Overlay: West 70th Street and Metro Blvd PW -09 -006 n/a 400,000 400,000 Public Works Total 6,454,000 7,432,000 7,560,000 7,370,000 6,950,000 35,766,000 Utili Department Watermain/Sanitary: Country Club Area UT- 00,020 1 3,553,000 3,553,000 Storm water Lift Station (Highlands Lake) UT -02 -003 n/a 75,000 75,000 Lift Station #1 (4041 Sunnyside Road) UT -03 -010 n/a 130,000 730,000 1998 Cat Backhoe Replacement UT- 03,072 n/a 160,000 160,000 Well #2 (4521 West 50th Street) UT -03 -015 n/a 50,000 50,000 Public Works: Braemar Work Site - Lead Removal UT- 04,005 n/a 200,000 200,000 Lift Station #2 (4200 Grimes Ave) UT- 05,008 2 100,000 100,000 Lift Station #7 (4021 Grimes Ave) UT -05 -009 2 120,000 , 120,000 Lift Station #8 (4023 Monterey Ave) UT -05 -010 2 120,000 120,000 Lift Station #20 (5901 West 62nd St) UT -05 -011 2 100,000 100,000 Well #13 (6721 2nd St) UT -05 -072 2 150,000 150,000 Well #6 (5849 Ruth St) UT -05 -013 2 120,000 120,000 New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) UT -07 -002 2 2,500,000 3,500,000 6,000,000 New Water Treatment Plant (#6) UT -07 -003 2 600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 7,800,000 New Well ( #21) UT -07 -005 2 350,000 350,000 Water Meter Reading System Replacement UT-07-007 1 10,000 10,000 Sewer Jetter Replacement UT-07-008 3 300,000 300,000 Gleason Water Tower (paint) UT-07-009 2 500,000 500,000 Well #5 (West 69th Street) UT -08 -009 2 100,000 100,000 Piping Wells #9, #15, and #21 to WTP #6 UT -08 -010 2 1,200,000 1,200,000 Lift Station #6 Redundent 70 HP pump and VFD UT -08 -012 2 60,000 60,000 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Project UT -08 -014 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements UT -09 -001 n/a 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Pond & Lake Dredging UT -09 -003 3 60,000 60,000 60,000 1,500,000 60,000 1,740,000 Storrs Sewer- Pipe and Grading Improvements UT -09 -004 n/a 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 7,644,000 Annual Vehicle Replacements UT -09 -005 3 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 50,000 600,000 SCADA Upgrades UT-09-006 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 SCADA Computer Equipment Replacement UT -09 -007 2 35,000 35,000 Well #4 Rehab Project UT -09 -008 2 120,000 120,000 Well #12 Rehab Project UT-09-009 2 120,000 120,000 Well # 2 Rehab Project UT- 09,010 2 120,000 120,000 Utility Department Total 9,813,000 6,974,000 6,130,000 9,030,000 6,080,000 38,027,000 GRAND TOTAL 40,876,500 18,244,000 15,127,000 18,495,000 15,762,000 108,504,500 Page 16 City of Edina, MN Capital Improvement Program 2009 thru 2013 PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE Source Proiect# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total lAquatic Center Fund Flowrider AQC -03 -001 n/a 600,000 600,000 1,200,000 Upgrades and Replacements AQC -09 -001 n/a 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 230,000 Aquatic Center Fund Total 640,000 640,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,430,000 Capital Improvement Bonds Public Works Building MB -04 -001 n/a 22,000,000 22,000,000 Capital Improvement Bonds Total 22,000,000 22,000,000 Construction Fund Replace Zamboni A- 00,006 n/a 105,000 105,000 Truck with Plow A -08 -003 n1a 26,000 26,000 Repairs & Maintenance A -09 -001 n/a 25,000 25,000 50,000 ReplaceZamboni A -09 -002 n/a 130,000 130,000 Replace Phone System ART -08 -001 n/a 15,000 15,000 Repairs & Maintenance ART -09 -001 n/a 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 Complaint Administration Software BD -06-001 n/a 35,000 35,000 Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling CW -02 -001 2 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 EP Replaster Pool ECL -00 -017 n/a 70,000 70,000 CL Paver Replacement ECL -06 -004 n/a 40,000 40,000 CL Replace HVAC Units ECL -06 -005 n/a 22,000 22,000 EP Theater Curtain and Rigging ECL -06 -006 n/a 14,000 14,000 EP Replace Carpeting ECL -06 -007 n/a 12,000 12,000 CL Paint Amphitheater Structure ECL -07 -003 n/a 16,000 16,000 CL Signage improvement ECL -07 -004 n/a 20,000 20,000 EP Adventure Peak Renovation ECL -07 -006 n/a 25,000 25,000 EP Floor Scrubber ECL -07 -007 n/a 7,000 7,000 CL Paint South Park Railings ECL -08 -003 n/a 28,000 28,000 CL Renovate Putting Greens ECL -08 -004 n/a 40,000 40,000 CL Replace CrackedBroken Concrete ECL -08 -005 n/a 12,000 12,000 EP Security Camera System ECL -08 -007 n/a 12,000 12,000 EP Torrent Floor Machine ECL -08 -009 n/a 8,000 8,000 EP Soft Play for Great Hall ECL -08 -011 n/a 30,000 30,000 EP Park Sound System ECL -08 -016 n/a 25,000 25,000 EP HVAC Rooftop Units ECL -08 -018 n/a 250,000 250,000 EP Weight & Aerobic Equipment ECL -08 -019 n/a 6,000 6,000 EP Pool and Wall Tile ECL -08 -021 n1a 80,000 80,000 CL Replace Ice Resurfacer ECL -09 -003 n/a 10,000 10,000 CL Amphitheater Speakers ECL - 09,004 n1a 14,000 14,000 CL Centrum Planter Beds ECL -09 -005 n/a 16,000 16,000 CL Centrum Fountain Remodel ECL -09 -006 n1a 30,000 30,000 CL Add Restroom Facility ECL -09 -007 n/a 120,000 120,000 Page 17 Source Project# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total CL Replace Park Sound System ECL -09 -008 CL Replace Concrete ECL -09 -009 EP Theater Floor ECL -09 -011 EP Exterior Arch Brickwork ECL -09 -012 EP Outdoor Storage Shed ECL -09 -013 EP Lift to Birthday Party Area ECL -09 -014 EP Track Floor ECL -09 -015 EP Parking Ramp Concrete & Drain Tile ECL -09 -016 EP Cul-de -sac Sidewalk Replacement ECL - 09,018 EP Portable Concession Stand ECL -09 -019 EP Upper Commons Seating Area ECL -09 -020 EP Adventure Peak Remodel ECL -09 -021 City Hall/Public Works Building MB -09 -001 Pamela Park: Renovate senior athletic field PK -00 -033 Pamela Park: Playground PK -00-039 Chowen Park: Playground PK -02 -041 Pamela Park: Batting /pitching cages PK -04 -001 Walnut Ridge Park: Hockey rink relocation PK -04 -003 Todd Park: Pathway renovation PK -05 -009 Arneson Acres Park: Window replacement PK -07 -002 Pamela Park: New athletic field with lights PK -07 -004 Lewis Park: Pathway lighting PK -06 -M Normandale Park: Rebuild tennis courts PK -09 -001 Bredesen Park: Pathway renovations PK -09 -002 Highlands Park: Parking lot renovation PK -09 -003 Pamela Park: West parking lot/entrance renovation PK -09 -004 Natural resources inventory assessment PK -09 -005 Garden Park: Parking lot renovation PK -09 -005 Countryside Park: Master plan development PK -09 -007 Pamela Park: Park shelter Improvements PK -09 -008 Pamela Park: Softball pitching tunnel & scoreboard PK -09 -009 Outdoor Warning System PS -01 -004 Braemar Cold Storage - Fire Suppression PW -08 -004 Skid Steer PW -08.005 Sidewalks/Pathways: City Costs PW -09.003 Construction Fund Total 250,000 n/a Edinborough /Centennial Fund CL Park Storage Building ECL- 03,008 CL Replace Utility Vehicle ECL -04 -004 CL Bridge to Clubhouse ECL -04 -005 CL Fountain ECL -04 -006 EP Replace Gym Curtain ECL -07 -008 EP Concrete - Main Entrance ECL -08 -008 EP Convert Kitchen to Restrooms ECL -08 -012 EP Office Security Cameras ECL -08 -015 EP Water Heater & Holding Tanks ECL -08 -017 EP HVAC Rooftop Units ECL -08 -018 CL Centrum Building Counter Remodel ECL -09 -001 CL Replace Walkway Lights ECL -09 -001 EP Used Scissors Lift ECL -09 -017 Edinborough/Centennial Fund Total n/a 1,191,000 1,303,000 922,000 1,155,000 997,000 5,568,000 n/a 15,000 15,000 n/a 12,000 22,000 n/a 40,000 20,000 n/a 8,000 15,000 n/a 8,000 8,000 n/a 25,000 25,000 n/a 60,000 60,000 n/a 20,000 25,000 n/a 24,000 25,000 n/a 250,000 8,000 n/a 8,500 8,500 n/a 35,000 35,000 n/a 9,000 9,000 n/a 150,000 489,500 n/a 120,000 n/a 30,000 n/a 90,000 n/a 45,000 n/a 20,000 n/a n/a n/a 55,000 n/a 250,000 250,000 n/a 50,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,000 15,000 45,000 35,000 28,000 25,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 330,000 400,000 30,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 500,000 n/a 220,000 n/a 30,000 n/a 40,000 n/a 70,000 n/a 60,000 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 32,000 15,000 22,000 20,000 15,000 45,000 35,000 28,000 25,000 25,000 8,000 25,000 175,000 330,000 150,000 110,000 30,000 90,000 45,000 20,000 400,000 30,000 55,000 500,000 50,000 150,000 100,000 250,000 500,000 220,000 30,000 40,000 70,000 60,000 250,000 Page 18 1,191,000 1,303,000 922,000 1,155,000 997,000 5,568,000 n/a 15,000 15,000 n/a 12,000 12,000 n/a 40,000 40,000 n/a 8,000 8,000 n/a 8,000 8,000 n/a 25,000 25,000 n/a 60,000 60,000 n/a 20,000 20,000 n/a 24,000 24,000 n/a 250,000 250,000 n/a 8,500 8,500 n/a 10,000 10,000 n/a 9,000 9,000 489,500 489,500 Page 18 Source Project# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Golf Course Fund Braemar & Braemar Exec: Parking Lot Resurfacing GC -06-001 n/a 75,000 75,000 75,000 225,000 Braemar. Maintenance Equipment GC -09-001 n/a 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 155,000 745,000 Braemar. Miscellaneous Equipment GC -09-002 n/a 38,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 198,000 Golf Course Fund Total 253,000 260,000 265,000 195,000 195,000 1,168,000 Li uor Fund 50th: Replace 2 Compressors L/Q -01 -002 n/a 16,000 16,000 York: Enclose Loading Dods L/Q -02 -002 n/a 140,000 140,000 50th: Store Remodel LIO -02 -005 n/a 95,000 95,000 York: Store Remodel LIO -09 -002 n/a 320,000 320,000 50th: Replace Entrance Door LIQ -09 -003 n/a 20,000 20,000 Liquor Fund Total 156,000 95,000 320,000 20,000 591,000 Munici al State Aid Mill & Overlay: Benton Ave. (Hansen - Hwy 100) PW -00 -004 n/a 180,000 180,000 Reconstruct 44th Ave. (TH 100 - France) PW -00 -012 n/a 720,000 720,000 Concrete Rehab: Tracy Ave. (Vernon - TH62) PW -00 -015 n/a 480,000 480,000 Reconstruct W. 70th St (TH 100 -France) PW -00 -017 n/a 960,000 960,000 Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00 -074 n/a 360,000 360,000 Reconstruct W 62nd St (Oaklawn - France) PW -01 -011 n/a 416,000 416,000 Reconstruct: W 54th St (Wooddale to France) PW -01 -012 n/a 680,000 680,000 Mill & Overlay: Blake Rd (Vernon to Interlachen) PW -03 -003 n/a 319,000 319,000 Reconstruct: W 58th St (Wooddale to France) PW -04 -001 n/a 720,000 720,000 Bridge: 54th Street Bridge PW -05 -003 n/a 400,000 400,000 Northeast Edina Traffic Calming PW -07 -004 n/a 115,000 82,000 197,000 Reconstruct / Sidewalk: VV Rd at Braemar Blvd PW -08 -006 n/a 560,000 560,000 Sidewalks/Pathways (MSA) PW -09 -002 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Mill & Overlay: W 69th St (France to York) PW -09 -004 n/a 550,000 550,000 Sidewalk: France Ave (48 to 49) PW -09 -005 n/a 250,000 250,000 Mill and Overlay: West 70th Street and Metro Blvd PW -09 -006 n/a 400,000 400,000 Municipal State Aid Total 1,134,000 2,132,000 1,500,000 1,546,000 1,130,000 7,442,000 Public Improvement Revolvin Bonds Reconstruct 44th Ave. (TH 100 - France) PW -00 -012 n/a 180,000 180,000 Concrete Rehab: Tracy Ave. (Vernon - TH62) PW -00-015 n/a 120,000 120,000 Reconstruct W. 70th St (TH 100 -France) PW -00 -017 n/a 240,000 240,000 Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00 -074 n/a 90,000 90,000 Reconstruct: W 62nd St. (Oaklawn - France) PW -01 -011 n/a 104,000 104,000 Reconstruct: W 54th St (Wooddale to France) PW -01 -012 n/a 170,000 170,000 Reconstruct W 58th St (Wooddale to France) PW -04 -001 n/a 180,000 180,000 Reconstruct / Sidewalk: VV Rd at Braemar Blvd PW -08 -006 n/a 140,000 140,000 Neighborhood Street Recon. Program PW -09 -001 n/a 5,200,000 4,440,000 5,830,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 26,470,000 Public Improvement Revolving Bonds 5,200,000 4,940,000 6,010,000 5,774,000 5,770,000 27,694,000 Total Revenue Bonds Refurbish West Arena A -04 -001 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Page 19 Source Proiect# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Dehumidification System A -07 -002 n/a 75,000 150,000 150,000 UT-09 -003 300,000 Parking Lot Repair A -08 -004 n/a UT -09 -004 100,000 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 7,644,000 700,000 Install Underground Irrigation A -08 -005 n/a 5,150 100,000 100,000 Building Fagade A -08 -006 n/a 100,000 100,000 Replace Building Skate Tile A- 08,007 n/a 100,000 100,000 Revenue Bonds Total 1,650,000 250,000 11900,000 State Bridge Bond Bridge: 56th Street Bridge PW -00 -029 n/a 250,000 250,000 State Bridge Bond Total 250,000 150,000 Unfunded Parking Lot Expansion ART -01 -001 n/a 70,000 70,000 Building Expansion ART07 -002 n/a 800,000 800,000 Braemar. Expand Cart Storage GC -00-071 n/a 50,000 50,000 Braemar. Replacement Irrigation System Phase I GC -07 -004 n/a 600,000 600,000 Dome: Upgrade Building /Restrooms GD- 08,001 n/a 425,000 425,000 Unfunded Total 425,000 1,520,000 1,945,000 Utility Funds - San Swr Watermain /Sanitary: Country Club Area UT-00 -020 1 1,394,000 1394,000 Lift Station #1 (4041 Sunnyside Road) UT -03 -070 n/a 130,000 130,000 Lift Station #2 (4200 Grimes Ave) UT -05 -008 2 100,000 100,000 Lift Station #7 (4021 Grimes Ave) UT -05 -009 2 120,000 120,000 Lift Station #8 (4023 Monterey Ave) UT -05 -010 2 120,000 120,000 Lift Station #20 (5901 West 62nd St) UT -05 -011 2 100,000 100,000 Sewer Jetter Replacement UT -07 -008 3 300,000 300,000 Lift Station #6 Redundant 70 HP pump and VFD UT -08 -012 2 60,000 60,000 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Project UT -08 -014 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements UT-09 -001 n/a 450,000 450,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,100,000 SCADA Computer Equipment Replacement UT -09 -007 2 15,750 15,750 Utility Funds - San Swr Total 2,194,000 745,750 400,000 1,600,000 700,000 5,639,750 Utilitv Funds - Stm Swr Storm water Lift Station (Highlands Lake) UT -02 -003 n/a 75,000 75,000 Pond & Lake Dredging UT-09 -003 3 60,000 60,000 60,000 1,500,000 60,000 1,740,000 Storm Sewer - Pipe and Grading Improvements UT -09 -004 n/a 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 7,644,000 SCADA Computer Equipment Replacement UT -09.007 2 5,250 5,150 Utility Funds - Stm Swr Total 2,160,000 1,784,250 2,260,000 2,300,000 960,000 9,464,150 Utility Funds - Wtr 2,159,000 Watennain/Sanitary: Country Club Area UT- 00,010 1998 Cat Backhoe Replacement UT- 03,011 Well #2 (4521 West 50th Street) UT -03.015 Public Works: Braemar Work Site - Lead Removal UT -04 -005 Well #13 (6721 2nd St.) UT -05-012 Well #6 (5849 Ruth St) UT-05 -013 1 2,159,000 2,159,000 n/a 160,000 160,000 n/a 50,000 50,000 n/a 200,000 200,000 2 150,000 150,000 2 120,000 120,000 Page 20 Source Project# Priority 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total New Water Treatment Plant (#5) UT 07 -002 2 2,500,000 3,500,000 6,000,000 New Water Treatment Plant (#6). UT -07 -003 2 600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 7,800,000 New Well ( #21) UT -07 -005 2 350,000 350,000 Water Meter Reading System Replacement UT -07 -007 1 10,000 10,000 Gleason Water Tower (paint) UT -07 -009 2 500,000 500,000 Well #5 (West 69th Street) UT -08 -009 2 100,000 100,000 Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements U7709 -001 n/a 550,000 550,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,900,000 Annual Vehicle Replacements U77-09 -005 3 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 50,000 600,000 SCADA Upgrades UT -09 -006 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 SCADA Computer Equipment Replacement UT -09 -007 2 14,000 14,000 Well #4 Rehab Project UT -09 -008 2 120,000 110,000 Well #12 Rehab Project UT -09 -009 2 120,000 120,000 Well # 2 Rehab Project UT -09 -010 2 120,000 120,000 Utility Funds - Wtr Total 5,459,000 4,444,000 2,270,000 5,130,000 4,420,000 11,713,000 Watershed District Piping Wells #9, #15, and #21 to WTP #6 UT -08 -010 2 1,200,000 1,200,000 Watershed District Total 1,200,000 1,200,000 GRAND TOTAL 40,876,500 18,244,000 15,127,000 18,495,000 15,762,000 108,504,500 Page 21 This page left bank intentionally. Page 22 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # PW -09 -004 Project Name Mill & Overlay: W 69th St (France to York) Type Improvement Priority n/a Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Department Public Works 2009 thru 2013 Description This project involves the milling of distressed surface and the repaving of a new surface on West 69th Street from France Avenue to York Avenue. Justification The need to rehabilitate this segment of roadway was determined by the Pavement Management System. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 550,000 550,000 Total 550,000 550,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Municipal State Aid 550,000 550,000 Total 550,000 550,000 Page 141 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # PW -09 -005 Project Name Sidewalk: France Ave (48 to 49) Type Improvement Priority n/a iseful Life Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Department Public Works 2009 thru 2013 Construct a sidewalk along France Avenue from West 48th Street to West 46th Street. Justification This provides the missing link of sidewalk along the westerly side of France Avenue between West 50th Street and West 44th Street. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Municipal State Aid 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 Page 142 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN 2009 thru 2013 Project # PW -09 -006 Project Name Mill and Overlay: West 70th Street and Metro Blvd Type Improvement Priority n/a Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Department Public Works Description Mill and overlay the bituminous pavement at Metro Boulevard and West 70th Street. Also, add a south -bound to west - iound right turn lane at this intersection. Justification This intersection was previously scheduled for a complete reconstruction in 2008. However, due to funding constraints and a re- review of the pavement we feel that the intersection could be milled and overlayed and then a complete reconstruction could occur in 2017, which at that time can include the Three Rivers trail system if so desired. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 400,000 400,000 Total 400,000 400,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Municipal State Aid 400,000 400,000 Total 400,000 400,000 Page 143 Capital Improvement Program Project # UT -00 -020 Project Name Watermain /Sanitary: Country Club Area 2009 Ihru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 1 Urgent Useful Life 100 years Contact Utility Supt Category Water Main System Department Utility Department ace water mains, services and sanitary sewers., Justification Sanitary sewer and water mains are deteriorating due to. age. This is a high maintenance area of the City utility system. Sanitary sewer pipes should be upgraded. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 3,553,000 3,553,000 Total 3,553,000 3,553,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 1,394,000 1,394,000 Utility Funds - Wlr 2,159,000 2,159,000 Total 3,553,000 3,553,000 Page 144 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project 4 UT -02 -003 Project Name Storm water Lift Station (Highlands Lake) 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority n/a Useful Life 20 years Contact Utility Supt Category Storm Sewer Improvements Department Utility Department Description teplace lift station with one that has two larger pumps and automatic controls. �t s Justification Existing station collects dirt and debris which affects its operation. Larger pumping capabilities are needed to prevent flooding of public and private property. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Sim Swr 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Page 145 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -03 -010 Project Name Lift Station #1 (4041 Sunnyside Road) Type Improvement Useful Life 20 years Category Lift Stations Description 'ump, Motor, and Wet Well Rehab. 2009 thru 2013 Priority n/a Contact Utility Supt. Department Utility Department Justification teplace worn-out pumps and rehab concrete wet well. l �l q I': Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 130,000 130,000 Total 130,000 130,000. Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 130,000 130,000 Total 130,000 130,000 Page 146 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -03 -012 Project Name 1998 Cat Backhoe Replacement Type Equipment Useful Life 10 years Category Utility Equipment Replacement Backhoe replacement 2009 thru 2013 Priority n/a Contact Utility Supt. Department Utility Department Justification This backhoe will be 12 to 15 years old and at the end of its life expectancy Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 160,000 160,000 Total 160,000 160,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - wtr 160,000 160,000 Total - 160,000 160,000 Page 147 Capital Improvement Program 2009 rhru 2013 City of Edina, MN Project # UT -03 -015 Project Name Well #2- (4521 West 50th Street) Type Improvement Useful Life 6 years Category Wells Description Well rehab Priority n/a Contact Utility Supt Department Utility Department Justification �ontinue to produce required water supply. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction /Maintenance 50,000 50,000 Total Funding Sources 2009 50,000 2010 2011 50,000 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Page 148 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN 2009 thru 2013 Project # UT -04 -005 Project Name Public Works: Braemar Work Site - Lead Removal Type Improvement Priority n/a Useful Life Unassigned Contact Utility Supt Category Water Main System Department Utility Department existing stabilized lead contaminated soil located at Braemar Public Works Site. Justification The lead abatement project for the Brian Wipperman Gun Range left approximately 2000 cubic yards of stabilized lead soil at this location. The construction of the Braemar Public Safety Training Facility has drastically reduced the amount of space needed for the Public Works and Parks maintenance operation. This soil removal will free -up approximately 15,000 square feet of working area. This area is used for sorting soils and debris from watermain breaks, construction projects, leaf storage, etc. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Page 149 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -05 -008 Project Name Lift Station #2 (4200 Grimes Ave) Type Improvement Useful Life 30 years Category Lift Stations Description Rehab Lift Station Justification 2009 thru 2013 Priority 2 Very Important Contact Utility Supt. Department Utility Department Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 2009 _. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 150 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -05 -009 Project Name Lift Station #7 (4021 Grimes Ave) 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 30 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Lift Stations Department Utility Department Oription ab Lift Station and move across the street to the NE corner. Justification Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 Page 151 120,000 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -05 -010 Project Name Lift Station #8 (4023 Monterey Ave) Type Improvement Useful Life 30 years Category Lift Stations Lift Station Justification 2009 1hru 2013 Priority 2 Very Important Contact Utility Supt. Department Utility Department Expenditures 2009 .2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total Funding Sources 2009 120,000 2010 2011 120,000 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Page 152 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -05 -011 Project Name Lift Station #20 (5901 West 62nd St) 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 30 years Contact Utility Supt Category Lift Stations Department Utility Department Description Rehab Lift Station Justification Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total Funding Sources 2009 100,000 2010 2011 100,000 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 153 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -05 -012 Project Name well #13 (6721 2nd St.) 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 10 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Department Utility Department Rehab Well Justification Expenditures 2009 2010 2011; 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Page 154 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -05 -013 Project Name Well #6 (5849 Ruth St) 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 10 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Department Utility Department Description Rehab well Justification Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Page 155 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina. MN Project # UT -07 -002 Project Name New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) Type Improvement Userul Life '50 years Category Filter Plants 2009 thru 2013 Priority 2 Very Important Contact Utility Supt. Department Utility Department Description An additional 2000 gallon per minute iron removal filter plant to be built near the Southdale water tower. Justification I - [mprove water quality and remove radium in wells #5 and 18. With out this filter plant well #18 may become unusable. Zosts for this project includes land acquisition costs. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 2,500,000 3,500,000 6,000,000 Total Funding Sources 2,500,000 2009 3,500,000 2010 2011 2012 6,000,000 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 2,500,000 3,500,000 6,000,000 Total 2,500,000 .3,500,000 6,000,000 Page 156 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -07 -003 Project Name New Water Treatment Plant ( #6) 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 50 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Filter Plants Department Utility Department 3000 gallon per minute water treatment plant to treat wells #9, 15, and future well #21. This treatment plant could - be located at Gardert Park or adjacent to Well #9 located at Benton Road and Hanson Road. Justification iprove water quality and regain the pumping capacity of well #9. Costs for this project include land acquisition costs the treatment plant is not located on City property. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 7,800,000 Total • 600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 7,800,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 7,800,000 Total 600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 7,800,000 Page 157 Capital Improvement Program 2009 thru 2013 City of Edina, MN Project # UT -07 -005 Project Name New Well ( #21) Type Improvement Useful Life 100 years Category Wells Priority 2 Very Important Contact Utility Supt. Department Utility Department and build anew well ( #21) to replace Well #14 at Braemar Golf Course. This well would pump to water t plant 96. Justification Well # 14 has high levels of radium in it and can only be used 1 week out of a year with out notifying residents that we ire delivering them higher levels of radium than the Safe Drinking Water Act allows. Well #14 can be used for .rrigating the golf course and the new well will replace it in the drinking water system. Expenditures 2009 2010 Construction/Maintenance 2011 2012 350,000 2013 Total 350,000 Total 350,000 350,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 350,000 350,000 Total 350,000 350,000 Page 158 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -07 -007 Project Name water Meter Reading System Replacement 2009 thru 2013 Type Equipment Priority 1 Urgent Useful Life 20 years Coutact Utility Supt. Category Equipment Replacement Department Utility Department water meter radio reading system equipment. Justification 1xisting equipment and software needs to be updated to provide better information and improved reading accuracy. Old ; quipment is at the end of it's useful life. The City meter reading system is out dated and no longer being supported. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Mr 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 Page 159 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -07 -008 Project Name Sewer Jetter Replacement 2009 thru 2013 Type Equipment Priority 31mportant Useful Life 20 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Utility Equipment Replacement Department Utility Department Description Zeplace the 1992 Sanitary Sewer Jetter with a new Jet/Vacuum Unit Justification Phis unit has reached it's useful life. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 300,000 300,000 Total 300,000 300,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 300,000 300,000 Total 300,000 300,000 Page 160 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -07 -009 Project Name Gleason Water Tower (paint) Type Improvement Useful Life 20 years Category Water Towers and paint the Gleason Water Tower Justification ?aintina surface has reached it's useful life. 2009 thru 2013 Priority 2 Very Important Contact Utility Supt. Department Utility Department Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 500,000 500,000 Total 500,000 500,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Mr 500,000 500,000 Total 500,000 500,000 Page 161 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina. MN Project # UT -08 -009 Project Name well #5 (West 69th Street) . 2009 thru 2013 Type Equipment Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 15 years Contact Utility,Supt. Category Wells Department Utility Department Description With the construction of WTP #5 well #5 will be converted to a submersible well and the building will be torn down. Justification 3lectrical equipment will be moved to WTP #5 and the,ugly building on the median can be torn down. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 162 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -08 -010 Project Name Piping Wells #9, #15, and #21 to WTP #6 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 100 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Water Main System Department Utility Department piping from wells #9, #15, and #21 to WTP #6 so water can be treated. Justification Improve water quality in the north central part of the city. To bring well #9 back on line with the City's water system. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total Funding Sources 2009 1,200,000 1,200,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Watershed District 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total 1,200,000 1,200,000 Page 163 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN 2009 thru 2013 Project # UT -08 -012 Project Name Lift Station #6 Redundent 70 HP pump and VFD Type Equipment Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 30 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Lift Stations Department Utility Department (Replace an existing 20 hp pump with a 70 hp pump and VFD. I I Justification Lower operation cost, pumping efficiency and redundancy. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Equip/Vehicles /Fumishings 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Page 164 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -08 -014 Project Name Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Project 2009 thru 2013 Type Unassigned Priority n/a Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Sanitary Sewer Improvements Department Utility Department Description Phis project will provide a lining to the aging trunk sanitary sewer pipes. Justification Che majority of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes are adjacent to low lying areas or creeks. Some of these lines are known .or infiltration of clear water into the sanitary sewer system. The lining will prohibit clear water from entering the Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total 1,200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total 1,200,000 1,200,000 Page 165 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -001 Project Name Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority n/a Useful Life Unassigned Contact Utility Supt Category Water Main System Department .Utility Department Description Update water and sanitary sewer system when constructing neighborhood streets. See Project No. PW -09 -001 for potential neighborhoods. Justification The majority of the existing water system consists of unlined cast iron pipes. These pipes are more susceptible to failure than a lined ductile iron pipe or a pvc type pipe The newer lined ductile iron pipes or pvc pipes will provide better water quality and water pressure. ost of the sanitary sewer system consists of clay pipe that was installed up to the 1970's. This type of pipe is more one to failure than the current poly - vinyl- chloride and concrete pipes. The clay pipe is typically more susceptible to of intrusion, which decreases the capacity of a pipe. upgrade to the sanitary sewer system will help reduce inflow and infiltration into the system due to. deteriorating aary manholes, leaking joints in pipes, and leaking covers. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 600,000 600,000 2,900,000 Total 1,000,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 450,000 450,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,100,000 Utility Funds - Wtr 550,000 550,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,900,000 Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Page 166 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -003 Project Name pond & Lake Dredging Type Improvement Useful Life 30 years Category Storm Sewer Improvements ponds as necessary. 2009 thru 2013 Priority 3Important Contact Utility Supt Department Utility Department Justification Phese projects are necessary due to the aging of the City's ponds and lakes. This process involves the lakes filling in prom sediment into the system and natural life of organic material. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 60,000 60,000 60,000 1,500,000 60,000 1,740,000 Total 60,000 60,000 60,000 11500,000 60,000 1,740,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Stm Suer 60,000 60,000 60,000 1,500,000 60,000 1,740,000 Total 60,000 60,000 60,000 1,500,000 60,000 1,740,000 Page 167 Capital Improvement Program 2009 thru 2013 City of Edina, MN Project a UT -09 -004 Project Name Storm Sewer - Pipe and Grading Improvements Type Improvement Priority n/a Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category Storm Sewer Improvements Department Utility Department - ---- -Jr --- Provide replacement storm sewer for aging system. This also includes new drain tiles for roof drains and sump pump discharges. Justification As roadways are reconstructed within the City storm sewers will require updating. See Project No. PW -08 -001 for potential neighborhoods. 'Drainage swales also need to be regraded. Drain tiles where needed should also be included with these projects. In 1998 the City undertook a sump pump inspection program that included inspections of all properties in the City to eliminate any clear water connections into the City's sanitary sewer system. The program identified all' homes in the City that have sump pumps and other easement water problems. These new storm sewer improvements will provide a place for clear water discharges esnecialiv during the winter months. Expenditures 2009 .2010 2011 , 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 7,644,000 Total 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 7,644,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Stm Swr 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 7,644,000 Total 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 7,644,000 Page 168 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN - Project # UT -09 -005 Project Name Annual Vehicle Replacements 2009 thru 2013 Type Equipment Priority 3Important Useful Life 10 years Contact Utility Supt Category Utility Equipment Replacement Department Utility Department of small vehicles and equipment that are 10 years old or 100,000 miles. Justification Vehicles have reached their life expectancy. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 50,000 600,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 50,000 600,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 50,000 600,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 50,000 600,000 Page 169 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -006 Project Name SCADA Upgrades 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement . Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 15 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Utility Equipment Replacement Department Utility Department improvement and add additional information to the system that wasn't included in the system. Justification teduces time and operating cost of the Utility system. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Page 170 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -007 Project Name SCADA Computer Equipment Replacement 2009 thru 2013 Type Equipment Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 6 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Utility Equipment Replacement Department Utility Department Existing SCADA computer equipment. This includes 3 servers, 2 laptops, and 3 work stations along with some neous equipment. Justification The existing equipment is reaching it life expectancy. The service agreement will no longer available after 2009. In 2008 we had one major server failure server Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Equip/Vehicles /Furnishings 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - San Sour 15,750 15,750 Utility Funds - Stm Swr 5,250 5,250 Utility Funds - Wtr 14,000 14,000 Total 35,000 35,000 Page 171 Capital Improvement Program 2009 thru 2013 City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -008 Project Name well #4 Rehab Project Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 6 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Department Utility Department escription ell rehab for well #4 which is on a 7 year rehab program. Justification temove and rebuild or replace well pump, remove sand from well hole, and conduct other repairs needed. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 120,000 120,000 Total Page 172 120,000 120,000 Capital Improvement Program City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -009 Project Name well #12 Rehab Project 2009 thru 2013 Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 6 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Department Utility Department Well rehab for well #12 on a 7 year program. Justification After 7 years the well pump is warn out. Repair or replace well pump, remove sand from well hole, and make other needed repairs. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction /Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 120,000 120,000 Total Page 173 120,000 120,000 Capital Improvement Program 2009 /hru 2013 City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -010 Project Name Well # 2 Rehab Project Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 6 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Department Utility Department Description Repair or replace well pump, remove sand from well hole, and make other repairs needed. Justification Improve water production. Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000. Page 174 METRO CITIES Association of Metropolitan Municipalities January 12, 2009 Mr. James Hovland Mayor 5539 W 70`x' St Edina, MN 55439 -1902 Dear Mayor Hovland: This letter is official notification that you were re- appointed to the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) by the Metro Cities Board of Directors at their January 8, 2009 meeting. Your term started January 1, 2009 and will go through December 31, 2010. You will receive meeting notices directly from the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) office at the Metropolitan Council. Congratulations on your re- appointment! I also want to take this opportunity to stress the importance of attending and actively participating in TAB meetings. As a Metro Cities appointment to the TAB, you represent the interests of all cities in the metropolitan area. As such, it is very important that you attend and participate in the meetings. When the Metro Cities Board considers reappointment to TAB, it looks at the attendance records of the members, among other things. Our Metro Cities TAB guidelines are enclosed for your information. Again, congratulations on your appointment and please call Todd Olson or me at (651) 215 -4000 should you have questions. Sincerely, atricia A. Naun an Executive Director Enc 145 University Ave W 9 St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 • Phone (651) 215 -4000 9 Fax (651) 281 -1299 • w-,vw.amm145.org METRO CITIES BOARD GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR APPOINTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) MEMBERS Part I. Requirements. 1. Appointee must be either a mayor or councilmember from a member city. 2. Per state law, appointees must include one representative of each city of the first class. 3. No more than one person from a single city shall, be appointed by the Board. 4. Persons seeking re- appointment must have attended at least 67% of the regularly scheduled TAB meetings during the previous term. 5. A person may qualify for additional terms if the member has attended meetings as required in clause 4, actively participated in the TAB and/or is in a leadership position. In considering the additional term, Metro Cities may consult with the TAB chair. Part II. Guidelines. 1. The Board, in making appointments, will place a high priority on making the slate representative of the metropolitan area with respect to class of city, geographic balance and types of city as defined in the metropolitan development guide. 2. The Board will give preference to those persons who agree to be a member'of Metro Cities' Transportation Committee. (Committee attendance during the previous term may be considered for persons seeking re- appointment). 3. The Board will give preference to persons seeking appointment from a city of the second, third or fourth class not represented on the Metro Cities Board over persons seeking appointment from those classes of city with a representative on the Metro Cities Board. (This guideline does not apply to re- appointments). L \M ISC/TAB /Guidelines- TAB2- 07.doc ft.� <,. ,aaa REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: January 20, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Received Meeting ❑ Since Last Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. City of Edina MEMORANDUM TO: City of Edina staff FROM: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director DATE: Jan. 13, 2009 RE: City website — December 2008 Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of December 2008: Total visits: 66,375 Number of visitors: 37,924 Total number of hits: 2,047,620 Average time of each visit: 12 minutes, 46 seconds Total page views: 190,718 Average page views per day: 6,152 Busiest day of the month: Dec. 28 with 102,462 hits The page most visited was the Centennial Lakes Park skating page, with 3,637 visits. Other top pages included the following (with number of visits): Centennial Lakes Park — 2,838 Edinborough Park — 2,299 Job Listings — 2,184 Administration & Jobs — 1,941 Edinborough Park General Information — 1,452 Telephone Numbers & Contacts — 1,342 Edinborough Park Adventure Peak — 1,294 Park & Recreation — 1,230 Edinborough Park Hours —1,124 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the Braemar Arena open skating calendar which was downloaded 1,695 times. Other frequently downloaded PDFs included the following (with number of downloads): City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 Winter Park & Recreation Insider — 833 Final Edina bike plan — 749 Employment Application — 717 Proposed 2009 -2013 Capital Improvement Program — 431 Community street map — 400 Autumn About Town — 351 Land Use Chapter of 2008 Comprehensive Plan — 348 Nov. 30, 2008 Crime Activity Report — 347 January EFD Pulse -- 308 Though the website has grown substantially in the past year, interest still needs to be generated among the public. To gain that interest and generate more hits, please attempt to include the Uniform Resource Locator (URL), www.CityofEdina.com, on all correspondence. We have been streaming video on our website for more than a year. The most requested videos in December were the December episode of "Agenda: Edina" (66 views), December episode of "In Edina" (59), Dec. 2 City Council meeting (56), Dec. 16 City Council meeting (45), community tree - lighting ceremony (42), Driving Distractions PSA (23), Truth -in- Taxation hearing (19), November Planning Commission meeting (16), July 1 City Council meeting (13) and November episode of "n Edina" (11). Please continue to tell others about our website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, contact Communications & Marketing Director Jennifer Bennerotte, 952- 833 -9520. Page 1 of 1 Susan Heiberg From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 1:38 PM Cc: Susan Heiberg; Wayne Houle RECEIVED Subject: FW: Memo:SAC Chair 12 -10 -08 JAN 0 7 2009 From: John Ferrell [mailto:jjcferrell @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 1:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Memo:SAC Chair 12 -10 -08 1 -07 -2009 Mayor Hovland, Council Members and SAC members, RE: Memo from Chairman Brown on 12 -10 -2008 posted to city web site I only found this memo today on the city web site when I wanted to download the agenda for the delayed last SAC meeting that is set for Jan. 8t', 2009. Much to my surprise, it appears that "various stakeholders" have discussed the situation. Who was involved in these discussions? When? What all was discussed? As a property owner to be assessed for the project why am excluded from the "stakeholder' discussions? I believed the SAC meetings were designed for this purpose? This does not appear to bean open transparent process. Please help me understand why this committee is not following open and transparent procedures? Is the recommendation already decided? Jan Ferrell 4704 West 70th Street 1/7/2009 RECEIVED JAN 161009 From: judyann2164 @aol.com [mailto:judyann2164 @ aol.com] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:49 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: YMCA Redevelopment project w /CommonBond Communities Mr. Cary Teague, City Planner You have all the reasons why this is an important project for the city of Edina. As an advocate for housing; workforce; mixed use, those who are mentally and/or physically challenged I want to add my voice and support to all of those good reasons. This housing stabilizes our communities, it is good for families, creates jobs, and fills a moral obligation to be our neighbor's keeper. What a perfect location and opportunity to meet all those criteria. Thank you for your good work, open mind, and hopefully a decision to approve this important project. Judy Rhein ISAIAH 522 Dodge Lane Mendota Heights MN 651- 454 -2220 Save time and money; shop 24/7 plus earn rewards www.marketamerica.com/judyrhein A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in lust 2 easy stepsl RECEIVED Page 1 of 1 JAN 15 2009 Mike Siitari From: Lary Pobuda [ Ipobuda @stewartlawrencegroup.com] 'tk�§ZAtiDUN V-ALks�� Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 10:24 AM To: Mike Siitari ZL4 �GN�c.� Z' Subject: This morning Mike, I wanted to drop you a note and let you know how much I appreciated the efforts of two of your officers this morning. I was on my way to the gym at about 5:20 when my car stalled on the on -ramp to south highway 100 from Eden Avenue. Within about 3 minutes, one of your officers pulled up behind me and put on his flashing lights while we tried to re -start my car. In the meantime, another officer showed up and they decided to push my car to the shoulder.of Highway 100 — past the on -ramp which I was blocking. After having no luck with re- starting my car, the first officer called a tow truck and Highway Helper to sit behind my car while I waited for the tow truck. appreciated their smart work in getting me off the on -ramp, and their extra effort in calling the tow truck and highway helper. I should have asked for their names, but I didn't. Please pass along my thanks for their quick and. helpful response. I hope you are enjoying the holidays. Best, Larry Lawrence A Pobuda Stewart Lawrence Group 8000 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1170 Minneapolis, MN 55437 952 - 835 -7109 952 -835 -7111 fax Ipobuda @stewartlawrencegroup.com www.stewartlawrencegroup.com 12/29/2008 ;f . . Page 'l of 1 RECEIVED Mike Siitari JAN 151009 #"L009 -613 94" To: Kudos File " -Zic�� C"r\A(4- Subject: FW: Please forward to Chief Sittark Thanksl 13 Nac S a 4v � From: Gerth, Andrea Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:34 AM To: chiefmsiitari @ci.edina.mn.us Cc: Nelson, Tammy S. Subject: Thanks! Chief. Siitar! -Edina Police Department, I just wanted to send you and your staff a huge "Thank you!" from, Methodist ER nurses and doctors working the evening /night shift of January 6, 2009. I was the charge nurse working this shift. We had a critically ill 38 year old male ton!ght who was in very dangerous heart rhythm that would eventually have become lethal. The only medication that can convert his heart back to a normal rhythm is rarely used anymore and our hospital doesn't carry it. The next closest location was Fairview Southdale pharmacy. I called 911 and was immediately patched through to Edina dispatch. They reacted very quickly and were very understanding of this unusual. predicament. I am amazed at how fast an officer called me back saying he was already at Southdale and would be picking up the medication in just another minute. The next thing I knew, I received a call with an ETA of one minute. I know your officers perform many services for the community and last night, the sometimes menial job of courier probably saved this man's life. We were able to convert him back to a safe rhthym within 5 minutes which is unusually fast for him. He started crying with relief when he stabilized because he thought he was going to die. So, on behalf of him I want to say "Thank you" as well. I don't know who the dispatcher was or the officer that brought the medication over so quickly, so if you could pass this on to them, I would appreciate it. Thank you for your attention to this and have a Happy New Year! Sincerely, Andrea Gerth, RN PRIVACY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments. Is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain business confidential and privileged Information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If this e-mail was not intended for you, please notify the sender by reply e-mail that you received this in error. Destroy all copies of the original message and attachments. 1/13/2009 Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED JAN 12 7009 Susan Heiberg From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 3:06 PM Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Invite to Edina Education Fund Show & Tell Luncheon - Monday January 26 From: Nelson, Karen [ mailto :karnelson @edina.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 3:00 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Invite to Edina Education Fund Show & Tell Luncheon - Monday January 26 Edina City Council Members, I would like to invite you to our upcoming Show & Tell Luncheon – see below. Let me know if you are interested – would love to have you at my table! Thanks Karen Karen Nelson Executive Director Edina Education Fund karnelson(&edina k12 mn.us 952 - 848 -4900 14EDiNA EDVGTION FUND I• • A _ LuNcH a N=—imm Edina Education Fund Show & Tell Luncheon Monday, January 26, 2009 11:30 - Registration and demonstrations 12:00 - 1:00 PM - Program Edina High School, enter Door #7, 6754 Valley View Rd., Edina, MN Please join the Edina Education Fund for lunch and an exciting new program! You'll experience firsthand the profound impact the Education Fund has on students throughout Edina Public Schools. There will be hands -on demonstrations from our most recent grant recipients, live presentations and more. Edina Education Fund . 5701 Normandale Road • Edina, MN 55424 952 - 848 -4222 • www.edinaedfund.com 1/12/2009 Protecting, maintaining and improving the health of all Minnesotans December 30, 2008 Edina City Council c/o Ms. Debra Mangen, Clerk Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Council Members: F SEAL, `' AN -5, 20,9 RECENM SUBJECT: Drinking Water Summary of Detect Monitoring, Edina, Hennepin County, PWSID 1270011 The following is a summary of results including the most recent sample(s) collected from your public water supply in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4720. Results of contaminant(s) detected at the following sample point(s) have triggered - quarterly monitoring. Monitoring will continue on a quarterly basis until the Minnesota Department of Health determines that results are reliably and consistently below the maximum contaminant level (MCL). If MCL violation criteria are exceeded, your public water supply will be legally obligated to notify your customers and remedy the situation. Sampling Site: Treatment Plant #1 Contaminant: cis- 1, 2-Dichloroethene MCL: 70.0 dug /I Date Collected Results Units Sample# Annual Averaqe 09/24/2008 4.00 Ng /I 200829753 4.9 03/20/2008 5.70 Ng /I 200805707 5.7 Contaminant: Vinyl chloride MCL: 2.4 pg /I Date Collected Results Units Sample# Annual Average 09/24/2008 0.70 pg /I 200829753 0.9 03/20/2008 1.10 Ng /I 200805707 0.6 General Information: 651- 201 -5000 • Toll-free: 888-345-0823 • TTY. 651-201-5797 • www.health.state.mn.us An equal opportunity employer Edina City Council Page 2 December 30, 2008 PWSID 1270011 Monitoring will be reduced at Treatment Plant #2 and future results will be evaluated to ensure reliable and consistent behavior. Any uncertainty in the reliability and consistency of the contaminant in question will trigger quarterly monitoring. The following is a summary of the results: Sampling Site: Treatment Plant #2 Contaminant: cis- 1,2- Dich/oroethene MCL: 70.0 dug /I Date Collected Results Units Sample# Annual Average 09/24/2008 0.80 iug /I 200829754 3.4 03/31/2008 5.90 Ng /I 200806269 5.9 All samples will be collected and analyzed by the MDH. Results will be reported to you as soon as they are available. We will notify you if any action by your system is required. This report should be placed in your records and a copy maintained on or near the water supply premises and available for public inspection for not less than ten (10) years. If you have any questions, please contact Cindy Swanson at 651/201-4656. Sincerely, l< (2-P Karla R. Peterson, P.E., Supervisor Community Public Water Supply Unit Environmental Health Division P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0975 KRP:CLS Enclosure cc: Water Superintendent Dorene Fier - Tucker, MN Pollution Control Agency Isaac Bradlich, MDH St. Paul District Office Minnesota Department Of Health - Environmental Laboratory. Final Report - Client Copy - Report Of Analytical Results Program: HC 26- SEP -08 Date Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) Date.Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Request Number: 336835 04:29 Request Page: 1 of 8 0.2 Samples: 200829753 - 200829754 04:29 Date Reported:, 07 -OCT -2008 PWS No Site ID Facility Name 26- SEP -08 City 1270011 1270011 EDINA 0.5 EDINA 26- SEP -08 04:29 Orig Samp Coll ID rnl 1 ar for Name 26- SEP -08 04:29 < ' h 0.5 - 7921 Field Blank Isaac Bradlic Type QTR Field Res PO4 Res Trip Blank I 3 - - - Sample NO: 200829753 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID Sampling Point 3943 E01 TREATMENT PL 1 of 1 t Dt rr)l 1 Tim 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * *t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Unit: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS Acetone Allyl chloride Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane n- Butylbenzene sec - Butylbenzene tert - Butylbenzene Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodibromomethane. Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2- Chlorotoluene 4- Chlorotoluene 1,2- Dibromo -3- chloropropane (DBCP) 1,2- Dibromoethane (EDB) < 20 20 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 .2.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 0.7 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 2.7 0.1 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26 -SEP -0 29 < 2.0 2.0 ug /L 26- SEP -06 _:29 < . 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Environmental Laboratory Minnesota Department of Health - - Report of Analytical Results Final Report - Client Copy Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program: HC (SAN.) Date Date Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SIIPPLIES Request Page: 2 of 8 Request Number: 336835 Reported: 07 -OCT -2008 Date 200829753 --:2008299754 Samples: Cit Site ID Facilit Name EDINA PW - -- 1270011 1270011 EDINA Orig Samp Coll ID Isaac Bradlich 7921 PO4 Res Trip Blank Field Blank Type QTR Field Res - _ I 3 - ample No: 200829753 Receiving Comments: Sampling Point Field No LOCID TREATMENT PL 1 3943 E01 nli Time 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS * * * * * * * * CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Unit: ORGANIC Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Note: Result Level Analysis Date Units Y Codes Result Re p t ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS < 0.5 0. 5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Dibromomethane < 0.2 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,2- Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,3- Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 0,2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,4- D ichlorobenzene < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,1- Dichloroethane < 0.2 0 2 ug /L 26- SEP - 08,04:29 1,2- Dichloroethane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- Si3P -08 04:29 1,1- Dichloroethene 4.0 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP - 08 04:29 cis -1,2- Dichloroethene 0.2 0.1 ug /L 26- SEP -O8 04:29 trans- 1,2- Dichloroethene < 0,5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Dichlorofluoromethane < 0 2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -OB 04:29 ro ane 1,2- Dichlorop P < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:2: 1,3- Dichloropropane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SE -OB 04:29 2,2- Dichloropropane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26-OB 04:25 1,1- Dichloropropene < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SE -OB 04:25 cis -1,3- Dichloropropene < 0.2 0. 2 ug /L 26-SE 04:25 trans -1,3- Dichloropropene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:25 Ethylbenzene <, 2.0 2.0 ug /L. 26- SEP -OB Ethyl ether < 1.0 0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:28 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.5 0.5 Isopropylbenzene Minnesota Department Of Health - Environmental Laboratory Final Report - Client Copy - Report Of Analytical Results Program: HC Date Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) Date Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Request Number:.336835 Request Page: 3 of 8 Samples: 200829753- 200829754 Date Reported: 07 -OCT -2008 PWS No Site ID Facility Name City 1270011 1270011 EDINA EDINA Coll ID rc)llPrtnr NamP Orig Samp 7921 Isaac Bradlich Field Blank Type QTR Field Res PO4 Res Trip Blank. I 3 - - - dmple No: 200829753 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID Sampling Point 3943 E01 TREATMENT PL 1 rcal 1 Pt-t Dt roll Tim 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Unit: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS p- Isopropyltoluene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Methylene chloride < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) < 10 10 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) < 5.0 5.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) < 2.0 2.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Naphthalene < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 n- Propylbenzene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP - 08.04:29 < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Styrene 1,1,1,2 - Tetrachloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Tetrachloroethene < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Tetrahydrofuran (THF) < 10 10 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Toluene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 1,1,2 - Trichloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:29 Trichloroethene (TCE) 0.2 0.1 ug /L 26- SEP -08 ^4:29 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26 -SEP -C :25 1,2,3 - Trichloropropane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -Ob _3:25 1,1,2- Trichlorotrifluoroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 267SEP -08 04:25 Minnesota Department Of Health - Environmental Laboratory Final Report - Client Copy - Report of Analytical Results Program: HC Date Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) Date Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Request Number: 336835 Request Page: 4 of 8 Samples: 200829753 - 200829754 Date Reported: 07 -OCT -2008 PWS No Site ID Facility Name City 1270011 1270011 EDINA EDINA Orig Samp Coll ID ('nllectnr Name 7921 Isaac Bradlich _ Field Blank Type QTR Field Res PO4 Res Trip Blank I 3 ample NO: 200829753 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID Sampling Point 3943 E01 TREATMENT PL 1 C'nllect Dt enli Time 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Unit: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS 0.5 0.5 ug /L 1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 ug /L 1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 0.2 ug /L vinyl chloride 0.7 0.2 0.2 ug /L o- Xylene < < 0.3 0.3 ug /L p &m- Xylene 26- SEP -08 04:29 26- SEP -08 04:29 26- SEP -08 04:29 26- SEP -08 04:29 26- SEP -08 04:29 Minnesota Department Of Health - Environmental Laboratory Final Report - Client Copy - Report Of Analytical Results Program: HC Date Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) Date Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Request Number: 336835. Request. Page: 5 of 8 Samples: 200829753 - 200829754 Date Reported: 07 -OCT -2008 PWS No Site ID Facility Name City 1270011 1270011 EDINA Units EDINA 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS Orig Samp Coll ID Col IPetor Name Acetone 7921 Isaac Bradlich 20 - Field-Blank Type QTR Field Res I 3 - ample No: 200829754 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID 3944 E02 Col IPnt Dt Coll Time 24 -SEP -2008 0820 PO4 Res Trip Blank Sampling Point TREATMENT PL 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Unit:. ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Orqanic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS Acetone < 20 20 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Allyl chloride < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Benzene < 0.2- 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Bromobenzene < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Bromochloromethane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Bromodichloromethane 1.0 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Bromoform < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Bromomethane < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 n- Butylbenzene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 sec - Butylbenzene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 tert- Butylbenzene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Carbon tetrachloride < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Chlorobenzene < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Chlorodibromomethane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Chloroethane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Chloroform 6.1 0.1 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Chloromethane < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 2- Chlorotoluene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 ^4:57 4- Chlorotoluene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26 -SEP -0 57 1,2- Dibromo -3- chloropropane (DBCP) < 2.0 2.0- ug /L.. 26- SEP -08 _ ::57 1,2- Dibromoethane (EDB) < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Minnesota Department Of Health - Environmental Laboratory Final Report - Client Copy - Report Of Analytical Results Program: HC Date Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) Date Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Request Number: 336835 Request Page: 6 of 8 Samples: 200829753 - 200829754 Date Reported: 07 -OCT -2008 PWS No Site ID Facility Name City 1270011 1270011 EDINA EDINA Coll ID Col IPctor Name Orig Samp 7921 Isaac Bradlich Field Blank Type QTR Field Res PO4 Res Trip Blank I 3 - - - ample No: 200829754 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID Sampling Point 3944 E02 TREATMENT PL 2 rnI I Pest Dt nl l Time 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS * * * * # * * * * *t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** %Unit: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS Dibromomethane < 0.5 1,2- Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 1,3- Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 1,4- Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1.0 1;1- Dichloroethane < 0.2 1,2- Dichloroethane < 0.2 1,1- Dichloroethene < 0.5 cis -1,2- Dichloroethene 0.8 trans -1,2- Dichloroethene < 0.1 Dichlorofluoromethane < 0.5 1,2- Dichloropropane < 0.2 1,3- Dichloropropane < 0.2 2,2- Dichloropropane < 0.5 1,1- Dichloropropene < 0.2 cis -1,3- Dichloropropene < 0.2 trans -1,3- Dichloropropene < 0.2 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 Ethyl ether < 2.0 Hexachlorobutadiene < 1.0 Isopropylbenzene < 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 2.0 1.0 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Minnesota Department Of Health - Environmental Laboratory Final Report - Client Copy - Report Of Analytical Results Program: HC Date Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) Date Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Request Number: 336835 Request Page: 7 of 8 Samples: 200829753 - 20082975,4 Date Reported: 07 -OCT -2008 PWS No Site ID Facility Name City 1270011 1270011 EDINA EDINA Coll ID 7921 Field Blank Col rrnr Nqmp Orig Samp Isaac Bradlich - Type QTR. Field Res PO4 Res Trip Blank I 3 - - ample No: 200829754 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID Sampling Point 3944 E02. TREATMENT PL 2 Cc)l 1 ct DY (r)11 Tim 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS * * * * * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Unit: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS p- Isopropyltoluene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Methylene chloride < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) < 10 10 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) < 5.0. 5.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) < 2.0 2.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:51 Naphthalene < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 n- Propylbenzene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Styrene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 1,1,1,2 - Tetrachloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Tetrachloroethene < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Tetrahydrofuran (THF) < 10 10 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Toluene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 1,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene < 1.0 1.0 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 1,1,2 - Trichloroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 Trichloroethene (TCE) < 0.1 0.1 ug /L 26- SEP -OP -1:57 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26 -SEP -0 :51 1,2,3 - Trichloropropane < 0.5 0.5 ug /L 26- SEP -08 u4:55 1,1,2- Trichlorotrifluoroethane < 0.2 0.2 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:5, Minnesota Department Of Health - Environmental Laboratory Final Report - Client Copy - Report Of Analytical Results Program: HC Date Received: 24 -SEP -2008 Program Name: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) Date Generated: 07 -OCT -2008 Request Number: 336835 Request Page: 8 of 8 Clmple No: 200829754 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID Sampling Point 3944 E02 TREATMENT PL 2 rnl1PcY Dt rnl1 Time 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *r * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS Unit: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result ' Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS 1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 Vinyl chloride < 0.2 o- Xylene < 0.2 p &m- Xylene < 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -OB 04:57 Samples: 200829753 - 200829754 Date.Reported: 07 -OCT -2008 PWS No Site ID Facility Name City .1270011 1270011 EDINA EDINA Orig Samp Coll ID 0-11 or Nam 7921 Isaac Bradlich - Field Blank Type QTR Field Res PO4 Res Trip Blank _ I 3 - - - Clmple No: 200829754 Receiving Comments: Field No LocID Sampling Point 3944 E02 TREATMENT PL 2 rnl1PcY Dt rnl1 Time 24 -SEP -2008 0820 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *r * * * * * * ** SAMPLE RESULTS Unit: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Reviewed By PDS on 07- OCT -08 Note: Positive Organic Results are indicated by BOLD. Result ' Codes Result Rept Level Units Analysis Date 468 VOCs in Water by GC /MS 1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 Vinyl chloride < 0.2 o- Xylene < 0.2 p &m- Xylene < 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -08 04:57 ug /L 26- SEP -OB 04:57 Pagel of 3 RECEIVED Susan Heiberg JAN 14 2009 From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:13 AM To: Susan Heiberg; Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: Recommendation to Reinstate Full Council Public Commisisoner Interviews Attachments: BCouncilMayorCommisAptSurvey.pdf From: Dianne Plunkett Latham [ma i Ito: Dianne. Plunkett. Latham @Comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:44 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle; James B. Hovland; Scot Housh; Ann Swenson Subject: Recommendation to Reinstate Full Council Public Commisisoner Interviews 1 -13 -09 Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am writing to ask you to reconsider your January 6 decision to return to the Mayor /Chair interview format. At your January 20 meeting, please reinstate the 2008 full Council public interview format and interview all applicants. Returning to the Mayor /Chair format of interviewing a `short list' of candidates behind `closed doors' is a step backward for a city, which prides itself on being on the leading edge. My reasons for supporting the full Council appointment process are based on the need to expand the pool of civic leadership applicants and to create sound public policy based on transparency and fairness. Of 17 metro cities surveyed (see attached) only 2 other cities use the Mayoral selection process. Advantages of Full Council Selection Process Reducing Bias - By having all Council members participate, individual biases are likely to cancel each other out. Transparency — With public interviews, the selection process is transparent. Although few residents are likely to attend, as in 2008, it is nevertheless reassuring to the public to know that they could attend. The Mayoral selection process, which is conducted behind `closed doors', raises the specter of cronyism. Stating as some Council members did at the 1 -6 -09 meeting, that they want to be able to discuss issues behind `closed doors,' which they are unwilling to discuss publicly, is troubling. In the public mind, it is possible that some of the issues sought to be discussed cannot legally be considered, such as race, age, disability, sexual orientation, or pregnancy status. Nothing negative need, or should, be said about any candidate. The purpose of the deliberation is to identify the strengths of an applicant. Fairness — Giving everyone an interview, for at least one of the commissions for which they applied, will enable Council to consider even `dark horses' and will enable candidates to feel that they were at least given a fair opportunity. Although a candidate is not a good fit for their chosen commission, they may be a good fit for another commission, or for some other community volunteer activity and can be directed to that activity. Greater Background of Full Council — The Mayor /Chair are involved under either fonnat. Having the balance of the Council members drawing on their pool of knowledge is a tremendous asset. The commission backgrounds of our current Council are excellent. Experience on at least 5 of our 11 commissions is represented by 4 Council members. But it can only be utilized to best advantage after hearing the interviews. I . 1/14/2009 Page 2 of 3 hope that Council would choose to attend, at a minimum, interviews for commissions of which they are a former member, as well as attend any commission's interviews for which applicants exceed openings. Council should, however, only be given a vote on those commission selections for which they have heard all interviews. I have no disagreement with allowing commission Chairs to participate in interviews; they had the opportunity to do so in 2008 under the full Council selection process and some did. For example, Jim Van Valkenburg, Chair of the Art Center and me as Vice Chair of EEC. Becoming Personally Acquainted with Future Commissioners — Having even a 5 minute interview with a future commissioner breaks the ice with council members and sets the stage for a working relationship with them. Council's Right of Refusal to Confirm Appointments - Council can refuse to confirm the Mayor /Chair appointment recommendations, but - - by then the burden of proof has shifted. It is much more difficult to deny the confirmation of a candidate whose interview you have NOT heard, then it is to have an affirmative vote after having heard all interviews. The Council is left with little recourse but to rubber stamp appointment recommendations. To do otherwise, they must bring up, on camera, the defects of the candidate they seek to have replaced by a more meritorious candidate. This has never happened to my knowledge on our City Council. Potential Disadvantages of the Mayor /Chair Interview Format for Women Lower Comfort Level — Applicants repeatedly tell me, especially women, that they have become discouraged from applying because when they do, they do not receive an interview. As a personal example, I applied to various commissions for 3 consecutive years before finally being granted an interview. In 2008,. most residents did not realize that the selection procedures had changed to a full council interview process, because it was not codified in city ordinance. Most were expecting the usual Mayor /Chair process. In 2008 there were 30 applicants, of which seven were women. By 1- 10 -09, 48 residents and one student had applied, at least 21 of which were women, with subsequent applications yet being received. With 28 commission vacancies in 2009, the applicant increase is fortunate. Why the application increase? Because residents realized that with everyone being interviewed in a public forum, by all council members, they would have a more equitable opportunity for being selected then by having to run the gauntlet of the Mayor /Chair `short list' with deliberation behind `closed doors'. In fact, the `Cattle Call' format was reassuring to some. They were not in the room alone with 5 Council members, but with other applicants as well. Those who had innovative thoughts expressed them in response to open ended questions, such as their recommendations for future commission activities. 'By hearing the interviews of others, candidates had a better understanding of why they may not have been selected and what they may need to do to achieve a future appointment. Presently, the Mayor and all Commission Chairs are Men. With a Mayor /Chair interview team, there will be NO women involved in the selection process. Men tend to value the credentials of full -time business people over those of part-time workers and home makers. But home makers and part-time workers may spend more time in the community and be in closer touch with the typical resident's desires and needs. Last year, 3 of the 5 Council interviewers were women and women were appointed to commissions in numbers consistent with their applications. Query whether a 100% male selection team will have the ability to be as fair? Only 34% of Edina's 2008 commissioners were women, despite their accounting for 54% of the population. Council's goal, should be to have women and minorities represented on commissions in numbers equal to their proportion of the population. Conclusion Edina's Mayoral appointment of commissioners is out of step with other metro cities, which nearly uniformly use the full Council selection process. For the above reasons, the full Council format, which grants a public interview to all applicants, and solicits recommendations from the Chair, represents good government with transparency, fairness and a minimum of bias. It also encourages more candidates to apply, thereby expanding the pool from which to choose future city leadership I urge you to reinstate the full Council format and to codify it in ci ordinance. Please schedule this issue for the January 20 Council agenda and give this important issue a full and fair hearing. Thank you for considering my proposal and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 1/14/2009 From: Dianne Plunkett Latham [mailto: Dianne. Plunkett. Latham @Comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:44 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle; James B. Hovland; Scot Housh; Ann Swenson Subject: Recommendation to Reinstate Full Council Public Commisisoner Interviews 1 -13 -09 Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am writing to ask you to reconsider your January 6 decision to return to the Mayor /Chair interview format. At your January 20 meeting, please reinstate the 2008 full Council public interview format and interview'all applicants. Returning to the Mayor /Chair format of interviewing a `short list' of candidates behind `closed doors' is a step backward for a city, which prides itself on being on the leading edge. My reasons for supporting the full Council appointment process are based on the need to expand the pool of civic leadership applicants and to create sound public policy based on transparency and fairness. Of 17 metro cities surveyed (see attached) only 2 other cities use the Mayoral selection process. Advantages of Full Council Selection Process Reducing Bias - By having all Council members participate, individual biases are likely to cancel each other out. Transparency — With public interviews, the selection process is transparent. Although few residents are likely to attend, as in 2008, it is nevertheless reassuring to the public to know that they could attend. The Mayoral selection process, which is conducted behind `closed doors', raises the specter of cronyism. Stating as some Council members did at the 1 -6 -09 meeting, that they want to be able to discuss issues behind `closed doors,' which they are unwilling to discuss publicly, is troubling. In the public mind, it is possible that some of the issues sought to be discussed cannot legally be considered, such as race, age, disability, sexual orientation; or pregnancy status. Nothing negative need, or should, be said about any candidate. The purpose of the deliberation is to identify the strengths of an applicant. Fairness — Giving everyone an interview, for at least one of the commissions for which they applied, will enable Council to consider even `dark horses' and will enable candidates to feel that they were at least given a fair opportunity. Although a candidate is not a good fit for their chosen commission, they may be a good fit for another commission, or for some other community volunteer activity and can be directed to that activity. Greater Background of Full Council — The Mayor /Chair are involved under either format. Having the balance of the Council members drawing on their pool of knowledge is a tremendous asset. The commission backgrounds of our current Council are excellent. Experience on at least 5 of our 1 1 commissions is represented by 4 Council members. But it can only be utilized to best advantage after hearing the interviews. I hope that Council would choose to attend, at a minimum, interviews for commissions of which they are a former member, as well as attend any commission's interviews for which applicants exceed openings. Council should, however, only be given a vote on those commission selections for which they have heard all interviews. I have no disagreement with allowing commission Chairs to participate in interviews; they had the opportunity to do so in 2008 under the full Council selection process and some did. For example, Jim Van Valkenburg, Chair of the Art Center and me as Vice Chair of EEC. Becoming Personally Acquainted with Future Commissioners — Having even a 5 minute interview with a future commissioner breaks the ice with council members and sets the stage for a working relationship with them. Council's Right of Refusal to Confirm Appointments - Council can refuse to confirm the Mayor /Chair appointment recommendations, but - - by then the burden of proof has shifted. It is much more difficult to deny the confirmation of a candidate whose interview you have NOT heard, then it is to have an affirmative vote after having heard all interviews. The Council is left with little recourse but to rubber stamp appointment recommendations. To do otherwise, they must bring up, on camera, the defects of the candidate they seek to have replaced by a more meritorious candidate. This has never happened to my knowledge on our City Council. Potential Disadvantages of the Mayor /Chair Interview Format for Women Lower Comfort Level — Applicants repeatedly tell me, especially women, that they have become discouraged from applying because when they do, they do not receive an interview. As a personal example, I applied to various commissions for 3 consecutive years before finally being granted an interview. In 2008, most residents did not realize that the selection procedures had changed to a full council interview process, because it was not codified in city ordinance. Most were expecting the usual Mayor /Chair process. In 2008 there were 30 applicants, of which seven were women. By 1- 10 -09, 48 residents and one student had applied, at least 21 of which were women, with subsequent applications yet being received. With 28 commission vacancies in 2009, the applicant increase is fortunate. Why the application increase? Because residents realized that with everyone being interviewed in a public forum, by all council members, they would have a more equitable opportunity for being selected then by having to run the gauntlet of the.Mayor /Chair `short list' with deliberation behind `closed doors', In fact, the `Cattle Call' format was reassuring to some. They were not in the room alone with 5 Council members, but with other applicants as well. Those who had innovative thoughts expressed them in response to open ended questions, such as their recommendations for future commission activities. By hearing the interviews of others, candidates had a better understanding of why they may not have been selected and what they may need to do to achieve a future appointment. Presently, the Mayor and all Commission Chairs are Men. With a Mayor /Chair interview team, there will be NO women involved in the selection process. Men tend to value the credentials of full - time business people over those of part-time workers and home makers. But home makers and part- time workers may spend more time in the community and be in closer touch with the typical resident's desires and needs. Last year, 3 of the 5 Council interviewers were women and women were appointed to commissions in numbers consistent with their applications. Query whether a 100% male selection team will have the ability to be as fair? Only 34% of Edina's 2008 commissioners were women, despite their accounting for 54% of the population. Council's goal should be to have women and minorities represented on commissions in numbers equal to their proportion of the population. Conclusion Edina's Mayoral appointment of commissioners is out of step with other metro cities, which nearly uniformly use the full Council selection process. For the above reasons, the full Council format, which grants a public interview to all applicants, and solicits recommendations from the Chair, represents good government with transparency, fairness and a minimum of bias. It also encourages more candidates to apply, thereby expanding the pool from which to choose future city leadership. I urge you to reinstate the full Council format and to codify it in city ordinance. Please schedule this issue for the January 20 Council agenda and give this important issue a full and fair hearing. Thank you for considering my proposal and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Appointment of Board and Commission Members City Council Appoints Mayor Appoints With Plan B Consent of Council 1. Bloomington X 2. Burnsville X X 3. Chanhassen X X 4. Eden Prairie X X 5. Edina X X 6. Golden Valley X X 7. Maplewood X X 8. Minnetonka X 9. Mound X X 10. New Brighton X X 11. New Hope X X 12. North St. Paul X X 13. Prior Lake X X 14. Roseville X X 15. Shoreview X X 16. St. Anthony Village X X 17. St. Louis Park X Plan B cities not reviewed: Milaca, Perham Source: Ordinances from respective cities as they appear on/from the city's website RECEIVED Friday, January 02, 2009 JAN a 200 Neighbors and fellow Richfield residents, This is another follow -up after sending out a copy of my letter to the Edina Planning Commission prior to the hearing on October 1" of 2008. As many of you know Commonbond and the YMCA are proposing a tear down and expansion of the adjacent YMCA facility. They have partnered with Commonbond to include a massive 130 unit three story apartment building on the site. This requires approval to rezone for mixed use with apartments. The hearing raised many concerns about the planned rezoning for the YMCA site to allow the apartment building on the site. We can't allow additional lower income housing in an already saturated area. The proposed rezoning has been tabled to address concerns raised from the hearing. The track history of crime and poor property management of the Yorkdale Townhomes site that we are very aware of raises many concerns of their intentions and what are best for the public safety and neighborhood It still is not very clear as to whom the actual residents that Commonbond and the YMCA have proposed for the apartments. This plan will overall add more congestion to an already overpopulated area and the Yorkdale Townhomes site that has been troubled with high crime, drugs and even a shooting in recent years. The plan also calls for a massive parking ramp next to the back of the neighborhood and surrounding parks. The construction is also planned across over a 2 year period. The developer recently sent out a proposed change for the plan and to our dismay did not address any of the concerns that were brought during the hearing except to change the elevation of the building. I did some follow -up from this and the hearing notes and attached an article that was published recently in a business magazine and brought some more points to the Commission and City Planner in an email. (See attached) Now is the time to speak up about this and keep raising concern with the Edina Planning Commission. Please contact Cary Teague at the City of Edina Planning (952) 826 -0460 about the proposed re- zoning. You can email him, write or call him directly. Ask him when the next hearing is going to be that will address these concerns and tell him to inform the commission of your conversation. Best Rega Prooert/Owner of 7429 York Terrace Cc: Mayor and Edina City Council . From: Cary Teague [cteague @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 6:17 AM To: thomas_kessier @hotmail.com Subject: RE: Invitation for YMCA meeting I some follow -up from Public Hearing Hi Thomas, I will forward your email to the Planning Commission, and distribute paper copies for them tonight. Cary From: Thomas Kessler [ mailto :thomas_kessler @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 3:33 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: Invitation for YMCA meeting I some follow -up from Public Hearing Mr. Teague, Hope you are having a pleasant holiday season. how We received the additional arch docsOfrcriticalD s s nwith thehowever f ail toesee project plan as these "revised elevations" address m e raised in public hearing in October by the many neighbors, citizens and planning board Commissioners and members. The general consensus upon reading es re for more housing an seem to be unexp a nedaplan of howo much building being proposed, n that housing will be used and a history n poor management of the existing units that has lead to a dangerous area and con for P ublic There are even specifier ariance out tas an issue forconce n. The a are setback variances on all Risser, Brown and othe sides of the lot and many Commiioners even recommend a reduction of apartment park that covers that whole back area n the cull Overall this layout destroys the de -sac and neighboring skate park and fire station where numerous children play and replaces it with a parking structure. Some questions: In addition why are there not drawings the 'The build buildings are set so far forward bird's eye and relational vie properties and original layout for the to the street that it doesn't blend into existing p ro p area. • Are there other supporting planning maps that are activity based for this area? Parks and residents in zone quadrants perhaps? • Has a feasibility study done on the projected traffic increase to support this proposed project? I can see bottlenecks during peak times of the day along Xerxes /York Avenue and this adding to the already busy corridor, especially now that the Westin is up. What about the special transportation needs of the MS residents too? It's hard to see the value that this project brings to the city of Edina and the neighborhood and tearing down a structure and rebuilding one of almost identical size and at double the cost to renovate the existing? Wouldn't it be.cost effective to renovate both the existing Commonbond and YMCA sites with that capital since they are non - profit? Confusion with the Housing Mix (article): I came across this article from the Business Journal as you're mentioned in: http:/ /twincities bizjournals com /twincities/ stories /2008 /09 /22 /storyl.htmI ?page =l After my reading, it raises more inconsistent and ethically challenging positions with Commonbond and the YMCA as non - profit providers that I'll be researching further. From that article the YMCA seems to be able to explain more of what the intended housing mix and makeup would be for the proposed units better than Ms. Flannery from Commonbond could provide the council with when asked. As quoted by VP of Development for the YMCA: "But this project wouldn't add low- income. or Section 8 housing. The units would be offered to three groups of renters: market -rate, people with Multiple Sclerosis and moderate - income workers such as teachers, police officers and YMCA employees who have difficulty affording a home in Edina, Lancello Bydlon said. " Providing housing for the YMCA workers addresses a city mandate to those who can't afford to live in Edina. The need sounds more like a for - profit role to establish apartment living for moderate income Edina residents. It's very inconsistent with the Commonbond vision and the average income of their resident as of January 2008 is $13,700 and as we all know that discriminating on renting to.only Police Officers, Teachers or YMCA workers would be unlawful. We haven't found any current Commonbond residents that fall in this career category income class either which albeit exceeds $30K annually. During the public hearing Ms. Flannery did provide and elude when asked by Commissioner Fischer what the "Magic Formula" is for the building, she then states that " Commonbond hasn't developed a mixed project of this size before ". That's a problematic statement which seems to raise more concerns and is more challenging with high risk that no one seems to have either the experience or vision with the proposal of putting Multiple "Sclerosis patients together with an unknown mix of renters, with hopes that they are ideal citizens. Especially next to a Section 8 complex that has a high crime rate. Ms. Flannery also couldn't provide how many Multiple Sclerosis residents need housing but threw out 50% which means over 70. That's also very vague and needs some support as to how these people would be able to co -exist and in a busy environment next to the YMCA and what additional special transportation needs they may have. Where is the MS Society's voice in all of this? Overall this housing mix seems more like a lot of ideas floating around but nothing seems well planned about how this apartment building will be anything but an apartment building with an eventual mandate of expanding the already excessive low- income housing into an already saturated area and accommodating some MS residents as a lever for the expansion. It lacks long term vision with due dilligence. We believe the public would be better served in a more cohesive plan for not. just this site but the adjacent site long term prior to the approval of any plan and hope the planning commission has leadership and vision for enhancing the neighborhood for all residents as they have done excellent work with the Southdale corridor. Thanks for your time and would appreciate if you could please distribute this to the Edina Planning Commission on my behalf. I'll be sending out a copy to the residents as well. Regards, Thomas Kessler Property Owner of 7429 York Terrace Subject: RE: Invitation for YMCA meeting Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:16:50 -0600 From: sdorgan(cbcresaoartners.com To: thomas kesslerO)hotmail.com CC: ctea4ue(&ci.edina.mn.us Mr. Kessler, Attached are the revised elevations for the proposed YMCA redevelopment project. Sorry for the delay, we were working to get these in a format we could send to you. Please call with any questions. Thanks -- Steve RECEIVED JAN 16 2009 January 15, 2009 Mayor Hovland and members of Edina City Council RE: 70'b Street Corridor Reconstruction I respectfully submit for your consideration the enclosed petition. The petition is only signed by property owners who will be assessed for reconstruction of West 701b Street and are within 400 feet of the proposed 70'b and West Shore Drive traffic signal Let us complete the recommendations made by SRF in the 1980 study before we install a costly traffic signal that may not be needed to solve the geometric problem on the West 70'b Street corridor. Our traffic counts are virtually the same as the study in the 1980s, we std need the free right turn at Highway 100 closed as recommended by SRF in the 1980x. Please proceed with funding the Phase I reconstruction, but with the West Shore Drive traffic signal moved into Phase H. After the completion of Phase I and the Crosstown project, a study will be necessary to evaluate the impact of said improvements. We can then determine if further controls at West Shore Drive and Valley View are justified or cost effective. The residents on West 70'b Street look forward to a quieter blacktop roadway, a slower school zone, signage to announce the Cornelia neighborhood, professionally designed landscape improvements that will calm traffic and improve our canopy and aesthetics. Pedestrian initiated crosswalk signals at the Arneson Park entrance and at Creston Road would provide much needed pedestrian safety. Closure of the free right turn will provide needed access gaps in the corridor.. The retention of left turn lanes and all eidsting on -street parking will continue to provide a safe, livable residential street for all residents and users of West 70'b Street. Thank You Jan Ferrell 4704 West 70" Street Enclosures: Petition and 4 maps 7 Par. Es Page 1 We, the undersigned, are requesting that the city of Edina move the installation of the traffic signal at West 70th Street and West Shore Drive into Phase H of the West 7& Street Corridor Improvements. We base this request on the following: I . The Phase I "closure of the free right turn at Highway 100" may provide the necessary gaps in traffic that are needed at Normandale Boulevard and West Shore Drive for safer access to the corridor. 2. The combination of Phase I and completion of the Crosstown improvements could provide the gap in traffic and volume reductions that are needed for a safer corridor. 3. At this time, it is unlikely that a traffic signal at West Shore Drive would meet the MnDOT warrant A traffic signal cannot be used to slow or constrict traffic. NMnDOT warrant is not met, MnDOT would contribute nothing to the cost of the traffic signal. We do not want to be assessed for a traffic signal that does not meet MnDOT warrant 4. Evaluate Phase I and Crosstown improvements before installing the aforementioned traffic signal- 5. Our. homes would be negatively impacted both financially and environmentally by the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of West 7& Street and West Shore Drive. ti 7D 9 4o rEST %0 AST ,K,6/ &),4 sSy.3� ) 0. f. C 41oC5 VV, __g4t4q - -sue 2 Page 2 We, the undersigned, are requesting that the city of Edina move the installation of the traffic signal at West 70th Street and West Shore Drive into Phase H of the West 70th Street Corridor Improvements. We base this request on the following: 1. The Phase I "closure of the free right turn at Highway 100" may provide the necessary gaps in traffic that are needed at Normandale Boulevard and West Shore Drive for safer access to the corridor. 2. The combination of Phase I and completion of the Crosstown improvements could provide the gap in traffic and volume reductions that are needed for a safer corridor. 3. At this time, it is unlikely that a traffic signal at West Shore Drive would meet the MnDOT warrant. A traffic signal cannot be used to slow or constrict traffic. If MnDOT warrant is not met, MnDOT would contribute nothing to the cost of the traffic signal. We do not want to be assessed for a traffic signal that does not meet MnDOT warrant 4. Evaluate Phase I and Crosstown improvements before installing the aforementioned traffic signal. 5. Our homes would be negatively impacted both financially and environmentally by the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of West 7e Street and West Shore Drive. __ L - LN--- /1 --'�, Viz/--- - - - - -- ., --�� ----=---------------------- ---- -- ---------- ------------------------ ------ ---------- - ---- - - - - - -- 3 DALFANZ RD Queue Lanes east and west bound Acceleration Lanes east and west bound 0 0 r 101k z .4 10 jM& L ta z 0 is 0 4 ST WO A)f- SC 10 —L—j ASPASIA.CIR RIONARDO LA'-":. _j ANDOVERRD va sELviaDERE LA 0 cJ j ----------- 44 '0 %_ 4 A Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Images courbesY of: Microsoft® Virtual EarthTM 2008 Page 1 of 1 Show [ H.ide Map Control 0-w! e- k�...�: — Closure of the free right turn at Northbound Hwy 100 will stop the free flow of cars and will group traffic entering the 70th Street corridor, allowing for gaps in the traffic at Normandale Boulevard and West Shore Drive >,,+„.//";c rn lu- nnPi►in mn > il,/ HC IFPrnne' rtvManBirdseve .aspx ?PII=3002824340082 1/13/2009 Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Y Hennepin County Oblique Aerials UM9eS Courtesy of: Mivosoft® Virtual Earth 2008 $howl Htde Map_Control Flight Date: April 2006 A Pedestrian activated crossing signal (i.e. at 51St and Halifax) would provide access from the north side of 70th and CPC members to Arneson Park and the parking lot. �Rrrv, Y ,,,P>1,w�an/R�rdteve_asnx ?PID= 3002824340082 1/13/2009 Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Oblique Aerials In„ayes eourt"y of. Microsoft® Virtual EarthTM 2008 Show L Hide_Map Control Flight Date: April 2006 X30 yds �u 0 2003 Iktaa-e" :;i.e; r.at onai Corp_ A Pedestrian activated crossing signal (i.e. at 51st and Halifax) would provide access from the north side of 70th and CPC members to Arneson Park and the parking lot. 7 „.["i -p" Man /Birdseve.aspx ?PIID==3002824340082 1/13/2009 �gZZ•IA, oe REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: January 20, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA M To Council Subject: Correspondence Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance Discussion Info /Background: Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out.. RECEIVED �st� t 9, aOo 9 JAN 1 u 2009 E-D i nr�+ P6,4 r✓N 1 N p Comm - fin? A�P�SEV 'Tp T hlf i30 t/N l T H-P T Po27767N OF THrs PR0 cc j - -j tI E Yo gf �4v,!5- ,4j Eft- #'3[Y ,Q E-14C)V Co —IYF eo/ i✓ T OF A6,1111-7-, -G l4 N PC/f iTON 0 -- 7-MIS P190 TEGT 6W--T F oQwWo _ 7-t/E2 6' OCI S 7- BF 6- CfWAIvC-G- 70� 7WE /r/D,e7l yrlC,4 XiT ,91v 7-0 I 1'YI ova ��E Ydncd &---X l 7- 7-0 T�!F- ��e /Pa,�r// fi'20 Pe5�'(2 7 ( irvE , 7 iY,4-- a ,� fists ITI-w� ONz- Y 96--- ON Td YOPW �� _ �}- Ts AA-'40 02 N STi4 GL i4- &D U- T Og 111 S /Gni 14-T TH�� rM c,4 - jP7WA4- PG-4c—c- )C) e- Z C 42S UJ,+,vTW62 7V 6�4 .5 -007 - # ON V0(2k �S gu Dtiz-Y use Tf% i5-Y),v1ST /1v6- . d ROUAID -,4 - BOUT — TvsT T Tllg�7- /v®/1Tlf 7'ff SF fleUEvF 7-We 6ma/�esrip�/ d- Y1�1 f�E _XT f1 SA �� 2 �� TE'�SE'ca7orr_ .. �-T •nrrf � -� b _� i 730o YoA 4vr "��vs THE Yma#S#A'-L' Oivilr T-vAA1 R16:#r jTH C*rAey wre- 40 fj�lro ya it 00 VVIr 0 ac.0 � jw Ata r Lj C4 91C IV07- YOR K' SA '91c zt Mlisr usE- ,n 40- ---L 8 C z > C g Ln % 44 Ltu a LO up IL you 4 &IF yo A k r9 ME XV Pi 09. c le Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED JAN 01009 Susan Heiberg - From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:07 AM Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Morningside water rates From: Neil and Tara Bizily [mailto:bizily @hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:07 PM To: Lynette Biunno; Joni Bennett; James Hovland Subject: Morningside water rates Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: I am writing with concerns about the recent staff, memo regarding Morningside water rates that will come before the Edina City Council on January 20th, 2009. As you know, northern Morningside recently had a major public works project to reline pipes and improve water quality. At the time the project went before council, the decision regarding how to pay for the project was deferred to a later date. The current staff draft proposes to pay for this project by increasing water rates charged to Morningside residents, specifically by setting rates through an annualized cost analysis that represents the cost of replacing all meters and all pipes in all of Morningside over the next 20- 50 years. The remainder of Edina pays for pipes and meters through the portion of their utility bill that goes towards capital improvement, and the costs of meter and pipe replacement are shared by the entire city, not passed on solely to the neighborhood where the work was done. Both Morningside and the remainder of Edina pay an equal administrative charge for billing and meter reading. I would ask that you reanalyze how Morningside water rates are set by determining the average amount Edina water users are charged for administration; pipe and meter replacement. Morningside residents use the same administration, pipes and meters, and should pay the same amount. Equal charges for the same services will insure that all residents are treated fairly and that all users of the common parts of the system are contributing equally to these components that benefit the entire community. Thank you for your careful consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Tara Bizily 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 55416 Windows Live TI: Keep your life in sync. Check it out. 1/20/2009 RECEIVED Susan Heiberg JAN .2 u 2009 From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:24 PM Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Please forward to the City Council, City Clerk, Public Works and City Planner - - - -- Original Message---- - From: T Volk [mailto:volk239@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:48 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please forward to the City Council, City Clerk, Public Works and City Planner Dear Council Members, Today, the Council is expected to approve a Resolution No. 2009 -12 Calling Public Hearing for Vacation of a Portion of Belmore Lane (02/17/09). It is based on the expectation that Interlachen Country Club is about to receive approval from the Planning Commission to proceed with its expansion on Belmore Lane. In reality, a permit required for said approval has been obtained while submitting the outdated supporting materials to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. All the plans associated with the Club's application, as forwarded.to me by the District, are reflecting the previous version of the project. Those six plans are dated 8/28/08 .. 9/2/08. Last fall, the Council cancelled the hearing of that version because it found that the current proposal is substantially different. Additionally, the Club has not completed the process of land sub - division, so the maps attached to their new proposal are not based on plats, as recorded by Hennepin County. Calling a public hearing on such -a substandard application would create a precedent opening the way to a stream of many more questionable ones, clogging the system. Additionally, it weakens the City's position in defending the legality of the project's approval process. Please table the Resolution No. 2009 -12 until all the documents will reflect the legal state of the properties involved, and the supporting documentation will become integral and current. Sincerely, Ted Volk 6301 Belmore Lane RECEIVED JAN [ u 2009 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, The League of Women Voters of Edina has submitted a letter to the editor to the Edina Sun Current regarding the recent Edina Boards and Commission decision. The letter is included below. Sincerely, Keeya Steel Public Relations Chair League of Women Voters of Edina Cell: 952 - 212 -9734 To The Editor: On January 6, 2009, Edina City Council voted 4 -1 to allow the Mayor to conduct the interviews of the applicants to Edina Boards and Commissions and then recommend appointments to Council. The League of Women Voters Edina (LWVE) was mentioned several times during the discussion and we would like to take this opportunity to clarify our positions. The LWVE does not have a position on the process of appointment to Edina Boards and Commissions; however, LWVE is disappointed that the Edina City Council made a decision on a matter not specifically listed on the agenda that could have benefited from public input. The LWVE believes that democratic government depends upon informed and active participation at all levels of government. The League further believes that governmental bodies must protect the citizen ❑s right to know by giving adequate notice of proposed actions, holding open meetings and making public records accessible. We believe that public comment from current commissioners, applicants, and the general public on their experience with past processes would have greatly enriched the deliberation and allowed for a wider range of viewpoints to be heard. Finally, the LWVE supports the accurate and timely publication of the application and appointment process. Whether the City follows the practice adopted on January 6 or returns to the practice tried for the first time last year, the LWVE recommends that the public be clearly informed and that standards for selecting applicants for interview, conducting interviews, and making appointments are open and transparent. Sincerely, The League of Women Voters of Edina Board - Pattiann Norgren, Keeya Steel, Judy Van Osdel, Germana Paterlini, Lonni Skrentner, Idelle Longman, Ann Keenan, Julie Rogers Bascom, Jennifer Janovy, Andy Otness F'o MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2008, AT 6:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Chris Rofidal, Bob Kojetin Arlene Forrest, Laura Benson, Connie Fukuda, Jean Rehkamp Larson and Elizabeth Montgomery MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Ferrara and Lou Blemaster STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. John McDonald, Edina Realty Sheilagh Ziegweid, 4615 Wooddale Avenue Mickey Armstrong, Coldwell Banker Burnet Realty I. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT A. Certificates of Appropriateness 1. H -08 -14 4615 Wooddale Avenue — Demolition of House & Garage Planner Repya reminded the Board that at their regular meeting on December 9, 2008, they agreed that the proposed plan for the new home and detached garage proposed by Mr. Busyn met the design guidelines of the District's Plan of Treatment, but needed to follow the procedure of being heard at two separate meetings. This special meeting was arranged to meet the two meeting criteria. Applicant Presentation Mr. Busyn thanked the Board for scheduling a special meeting to address the Certificate of Appropriateness. He explained the measures he took to share his plans with the surrounding neighbors and expressed his appreciation for their support. He then briefly reviewed the plans for the new construction focusing on the following design objectives: Size, Scale and Massing — A two story Colonial Revival home, to be compatible in size with the adjacent homes to the north and south. Design compatibility with other Colonial Revival homes in the Brown Section of the district, • Exterior finishes, emphasizing the traditional materials found in the Brown Section of the district, Minutes — December 15, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Special Meeting 1 Landscaping elements, providing the symmetry inherent with the Colonial Revival style, and The new garage complementing the style of the home, and meeting the criteria set out for replacement garages in the district. Board Comments Member Forrest - Asked Mr. Busyn to provide the Board with the type of feedback he receives from the neighbors when presenting proposed plans. Mr. Busyn explained that he has rebuilt over 14 homes in the City, and has neighborhood meetings to present the plans each time. The number one concern he hears is regarding the ridge height of the new construction, and the new language in the District's Plan of Treatment goes much further than the Zoning Ordinance in addressing that issue. Other concerns cited include, drainage on the lot both before and after construction; whether the style of the home will fit the neighborhood, preservation of existing trees, the back yard, and the price point of the new /rebuilt home. Inquired if driveways have been an issue. Mr. Busyn said that driveways have not been an issue; however neighbors make it clear that they do not want the drainage from the subject driveway to run off onto their properties. Member Rehkamp Larson - Explained that she was unable to attend the December 91h meeting of the Board, and was pleased with the decision to hold a special meeting to move the project along. She also stated that she was glad to hear the positive response to the plans from the neighbors. - Addressing the proposed design, Ms. Rehkamp Larson stated that the front fagade of the home feels historic and she appreciated that the sides of the home have massing that is broken up. - Expressed her support of the plan, and appreciated the material board presented. However cautioned Mr. Busyn to pay attention to the proportions of the front fagade gables. - Suggested the Board request receiving photos of the finished product from all four elevations. Mr. Busyn agreed that he would be happy to provide the Board with photos, adding that he will have a virtual tour to use for marketing the home that will also be available to the HPB. 4 1' Minutes — December 15, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Special Meeting Member Kojetin Stressed that the HPB needs to let the community know that the HPB does not want homes in the Country Club District, that have been identified as historic resources to be taken down. He added that the existing home at 4615 Wooddale Avenue is part of the fabric of the neighborhood, and the loss of this home will change the longstanding built environment in its vicinity. Member Forrest - Concurred with Member Kojetin's comments; adding that the Plan of Treatment for the Country Club District is very generous to change compared with other historic districts in the country, and the HPB needs to look at each request very seriously as it relates to the entire neighborhood. Public Comment Sheilagh Ziegweid - 4615 Wooddale Avenue Expressed her support of the project stating that the proposed home will enhance the neighborhood. She pointed out that over the years many homes in the neighborhood have experienced changes that have not enhanced the historic integrity of the area. John McDonald — Mr. Busyn's realtor - Expressed his support of the project pointing out that Mr. Busyn has extensive experience rebuilding homes in the Country Club District, he is well endorsed by the neighbors and will provide a quality product for the neighborhood and community at large. Mickey Armstrong — Owner Sheilagh Ziegweid's realtor - Stated that the proposed project is very positive, will enhance the neighborhood and is the right thing to do. Board action Member Benson moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existing home and detached garage at 4615 Wooddale Avenue and build a new home and detached garage subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans presented. 2. Historical and architectural documentation of the existing house and garage including written information, photographs, and drawings. 3. Photographs of all elevations of the new construction once completed 4. A year built plaque is affixed to the new home. 3 Minutes — December 15, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Special Meeting Member Fukuda seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion was approved. Additional Comments Scott Busyn — Expressed his appreciation for the work of the HPB, pointing out that he does not feel good about tearing down this home. As he has researched its history, he has.grown to know the home. Assured the Board that as the home is dismantled, he will treat the property with respect and take care to ensure that historic elements are recycled through the Green Institute. Shared his desire to build a home that will add energy to the block while maintaining the historic integrity of the neighborhood. Added his belief that the decision of the Board supports the City Council's desire for a balance between preservation and property rights in the historic Country Club District. Member Forrest — Complimented Mr. Busyn on his participation during this arduous process, pointing out that this project will serve as an example for future submittals, and adding that he has set the bar very high. Board members agreed with Member Forrest's summation. V. OTHER BUSINESS: None X. ADJOURNMENT 7:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce, Repya 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2008, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Chris Rofidal, Bob Kojetin, Lou Blemaster, Arlene Forrest, Laura Benson, and Connie Fukuda MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Ferrara, Jean Rehkamp Larson and.Elizabeth Montgomery STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. Robert Latta, 4612 Wooddale Avenue Derek Pitt, 4616 Wooddale Avenue Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: November 10, 2008 Member Kojetin moved approval of the minutes from the November 10, 2008 meeting. Member Benson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: A. Certificates of Appropriateness 1. H -08 -14 4615 Wooddale Avenue — Demolition of House & Garage Planner Repya reminded the Board that at the November meeting, the applicant, Scott Busyn shared his' concepts for the design objectives of a replacement home and detached garage, for the subject property with the Board. Mr. Busyn has completed a plan for the replacement home and detached garage which follows the concepts previously presented, and also incorporates the suggestions made by the Board. Applicant Presentation Mr. Busyn thanked the Board for their consideration of his design concepts for the subject property at the November meeting which he found helpful in completing Minutes — December 9, 2008. Edina Heritage Preservation Board the proposed plans for the property. He continued by providing with the following explanation of the proposed project and how it meets the recommended design guidelines in the Plan of Treatment: 1. Size, Scale, and Massing: a. Home will be a two story colonial revival similar in height, width, and scale to other Colonial Revival homes on Wooddale and in the rest of the Browndale Section. By replacing an existing colonial, the new home will maintain the architectural mix of the block while improving the streetscape with a more appropriate scale. It was Thorpe's intent (per the original deed restrictions) that the homes on Wooddale be of a larger scale than those on the eastern blocks of the District. b. Ridge height shall be within 10% of the average of the adjacent homes to match the streetscape of adjacent homes. The height of 4613 Wooddale is 24.5 feet. The height of 4617 Wooddale is 29.3 feet. The maximum ridge height for the new home is therefore 29.59 feet. c. Threshold height will be no more than 12" above original home floor height (was 897.4). to maintain the streetscape of the adjacent homes. d. 9' ceilings main and lower levels. 8' ceilings upper level to maintain the distinctive design of other colonial revival homes. 2. Design compatibility with other homes in the District and specifically the Browndale Section: a. Home will be a Colonial Revival with a facade architecturally similar to exiting historic homes. Distinctive characteristics will include: i. Two story rectangular volume covered by a gable roof. ii. Roof pitch typical of colonial revival homes in the Browndale Section of Country Club. iii. Semi - elliptical fanlight over front door. Sidelights Covered entry with barrel ceiling to mimic fanlight. Pediment gable with crown molding on front of entry similar to other homes and reminiscent of original home. iv. Symmetrical and balanced disposition of windows and doors. v. Double -hung windows with 6 over 6 panes on upper level, and 6 over 9 panes on main level. 7/8" muntins for a lighter, more delicate appearance common to Adam or Federal Colonial Revival homes in the neighborhood. Windows shall be aligned horizontally and vertically in rows, 5 ranked on front facade. Brick -style molding around windows with simple entablature cap. 4 e Minutes — December 9, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board vi. 3 symmetric dormers on roof with 6 over 6 panes. Classic engaged columns wrapping windows. Crown molding over gable panels. vii. Beveled wood siding with 6" exposure and mitered building corners. viii. Detailed cornice with dental molding and corbels over frieze board. Crown molding on rakes. ix. Louvered shutters on upper level, panel shutters main level. Wrought iron hinges and hold backs. x. Gutters shall have copper conductor boxes and downspouts. A Covered front entry shall relate to the pattern of existing adjacent historic homes and respect the rhythm and continuity of similar features on the street. Brick stoop. xii. Sun porch on south side will maintain the historic character of the main house. xiii. Home will be painted in solid colors appropriate to the District inspired from Benjamin Moore's historical colors collection. xiv. Year built plaque for the house hall be inscribed into side of brick landing (so as to not be confused with address numbers). 3. Exterior finishes: Utilize traditional materials and finishes a. Horizontal beveled lap siding b. Imitation wood window trim, columns, soffit, fascia, garage doors and cornice material will duplicate the size, shape, color, and texture of materials used historically in the district. c. Brick stoop. d. Wrought iron shutter hardware. 4. Landscaping Elements: Landscaping will enhance the character of a colonial revival home (symmetry). 5. New Garage: The garage will match the architectural style of the new house as well as the historic character of the neighborhood. a. Detached garage will be subordinate to the house in the rear left corner. This will minimize the visual impact on the adjacent homes. b. Roofline at 18' is within 10" of the average heights of the garages on the block. c. Sidewalls of garage will be adorned with soffit treatments, windows, and window boxes. d. Year built plaque will be placed on the south side of the new garage. Minutes — December 9, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Board Comments Member Forrest Commended Mr. Busyn on his goal to honor the neighboring properties when he approached his design, adding that she felt the plan exhibited a nice attention to detail. - Questioned the durability of the Fypon product proposed on the trim and dentil work. Mr. Busyn explained that Fypon is a light weight product with a much longer warranty than wood. He added that he has used it quite a bit and never had a problem. Member Fukuda Asked why shutters were not proposed on the north (side) elevation windows to compliment the shutters on the front of the home. Mr. Busyn explained that due to the window placement on the north elevation, shutters would not fit. Consultant Vogel added that the lack of shutters on side elevations is not inconsistent for Colonial style homes. Member Blemaster Asked if Mr. Busyn had taken into consideration the City's upcoming utility /street improvement project for his work plan. Mr. Busyn explained that the construction projects have continued in the District during the first half of the utility /street project with just a few delays, and he plans on coordinating his work with the City's project. Member Benson Questioned the process, noting that this was the third meeting in which the Board was addressing this project; the first was in October with the question of whether the home, an historic resource qualified for demolition; the second was in November when Mr. Busyn presented his design objectives and received input from the Board. If the Board did not recommend any changes to the plan presented at this time, final approval of the COA could be voted on at this meeting. A brief discussion ensued. Public Comment Robert Latta, 4612 Wooddale Avenue — - Expressed his approval of the project and encouraged the Board to approve the COA without delay. Ell Minutes — December 9, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Derek Pitt, 4616 Wooddale Avenue — Expressed his support of the project pointing out that the proposed home will be an enhancement of the neighborhood. Furthermore, if the plan is not approved, he fears the home will continue to deteriorate. Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue — - Questioned the accuracy of the streetscape elevation which depicts the subject home and the homes on either side. Mr. Busyn explained that while the plan is not certified by a surveyor, the plan is to scale and accurately depicts the height and distance between the houses. Chairman Rofidal asked that emails from the following residents supporting the project be added to the record: Mark Odland, 4613 Wooddale Avenue Trisha Hoyt, 4610 Wooddale Avenue Karla Pitt, 4616 Wooddale Avenue Board action Board members continued the discussion regarding the appropriate process for addressing the subject request. Member Kojetin stated that he understood the process for the COA of a new home to be 2- steps, with the first meeting when the plan is introduced, and a month later, after the public has had an opportunity to review the plans the Board would consider final approval. He added that the review this evening is the first with completed plans before the Board. Member Kojetin moved for preliminary approval of the COA for demolition of the existing home /garage and construction of a new home /garage. Member Forrest seconded the motion. Members Rofidal, Forrest and Kojetin voted aye. Members Benson, Blemaster and Fukuda voted nay. The motion was denied due to a tie vote. Member Benson reiterated that this is the third meeting addressing the subject request, and while this is the first meeting when the complete design of the home has been presented, because the Board is not suggesting any changes to the plan, she did not see the rationale for delaying a final vote on the COA. Member Blemaster agreed with Member Benson pointing out that due diligence has been done, and there is no reason for further delay. Member Fukuda opined that Mr. Busyn has done a commendable job of providing plan that meets the District's Plan of Treatment, and considering that no changes are proposed by the Board, she did not see the rationale for a delay in the vote. E Minutes — December 9, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Member Benson moved approval of the COA for demolition of the existing home /garage and construction of a new home /garage subject to the plans presented and the conditions recommended by Consultant Vogel. Members Fukuda, Blemaster and Benson voted aye. Members Kojetin, Forrest and Rofidal voted nay. The motion was defeated due to a tie vote. Further discussion centered on process. Board members agreed that the plan as presented met the criteria of the District's Plan of Treatment, and all comments received from affected neighbors have been supportive of the plan. Members Benson, Fukuda and Blemaster stated that although the understanding has been that new homes will be reviewed in a 2 -step process, if no changes are proposed, a delay in voting on the COA would create an unnecessary delay which could cause a burden for the applicant. To require the applicant to wait until the January 2009 meeting for a decision did not seem fair. Board members discussed the idea of holding a special meeting on December 15th or 16th (depending on room availability) which would give the appropriate time for advertising a special meeting and also provide the second meeting to review the project as understood in the process guidelines. All agreed that would be an acceptable compromise. Planner Repya agreed to set the meeting date and time as soon as possible for the next week and advice the Board, applicant and those neighbors on the mailing list of the final date /time. No formal action was taken III. PUBLIC COMMENT: None IV. CLG GRANT APPLICATION — Morningside Bungalows Multiple Property Designation Consultant Vogel advised the Board that he was in the process of completing the application to request a CLG grant for a multiple property designation for Morningside's bungalow properties. He added that the City of Des Moines has used the multiple property approach for landmark designations that has been very successful; and he would be reporting on their processes in the near future. Board members expressed their interest in the project, and agreed that they looked forward to learning more about Morningside's bungalows. No formal action was taken. V. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Procedural Guideline Committee Considering the confusion that became apparent during the earlier COA deliberations, Me[ IOei, Forrest suggested the formation of a committee to draft procedural guidelines outlining the C U Minutes — December 9, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board information required to be submitted with Certificate of Appropriateness applications. Board members agreed that would be an excellent idea. Chairman Rofidal then directed the formation of a committee to provide requirement guidelines for COA applications. Members Forrest, Kojetin, Benson and Rofidal offered to serve on the committee. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: None IX. NEXT REGULAR MEETING DATE: January 13, 2009 X. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jackie Hoogenakker 7 rr EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD ANNUAL CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT (CLG) REPORT 2008 FISCAL YEAR The following is a summary of the projects, reviews and activities reported to the City Council and Minnesota Preservation Office for the fiscal year 2008, (October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008): A. Local Designation of Preservation Sites: 'The following properties are designated Edina Heritage Landmarks: 1. George Baird House, 4400 West 50th Street 2. Jonathan Grimes House, 4200 West 44th Street 3. Paul Peterson House, 5312 Interlachen Boulevard 4. Grange Hall, 4918 Eden Avenue 5. Cahill School, 4924 Eden Avenue 6. Country Club District 7. Edina Theater Sign, 3911 West 50th Street 8. Edina Mill Site & Browndale Bridge — West 50th at Browndale Avenue B. Review of Requests for a Certificate of Appropriateness: 1. 4622 Drexel Avenue — Country Club District Request: Changes to a COA approved in 2007 Action: Approved 2. 4629 Bruce Avenue —Country Club District Request: Construct a new 2 -car detached garage in rear yard Action: Approved 3. 4622 Drexel Avenue — Country Club District Request: Changes to COA approved above ( #1) for redesign of front fagade Action: Approved. 4. 4600 Edina Boulevard — Country Club District Request: Construct a new 2 -car detached garage in rear yard Action: Approved 5. 4513 Moorland Avenue — Country Club District Request: Construct a new 2 -car detached garage in rear yard Action: Approved 6. Country Club District Request: Changes to traffic plan approved by COA in 2007 Action: Approved Edina 2008 CLG Report 7. 4633 Drexel Avenue — Country Club District Request: Construct a new 2 -car detached garage in rear yard Action: Approved 8. 4512 Casco Avenue — Country Club District Request: Construct a new 2 =car detached garage in rear yard, and changes to the front fagade of home Action: Approved 9. Browndale Bridge — Brownndale Avenue at W. 50th Street Request: Restoration of bridge to include wing walls, railing, and deck Action: Approved 10. 4627 Browndale Avenue — Country Club District Request: Demolish a hot tub house in the rear yard Action: Approved 11. 4511 Edina Boulevard —Country Club District Request: Construct a new 2 -car detached garage in rear yard Action: Approved C. Heritage Preservation Board Membership: 2008 1. Chris Rofidal, Chairman 2. Bob Kojetin, Hennepin Co. & Edina Historical Society Representative 3. Karen Ferrara 4. Laura Benson, Vice Chairman 5. Lou Blemaster 6. Arlene Forrest, Planning Commission Representative 7. Jean Rehkamp Larson 8. Connie Fukuda 9. Elizabeth Montgomery*, Student Member *Application attached as Exhibit "A" D. National Register Nominations: NONE The following properties in Edina are listed on the National Register of Historic Places: 1. George Baird House, 4400 West 50th Street 2. Jonathan Taylor Grimes House, 4200 West 44th Street 3. Grange Hall, 4918 Eden Avenue E Edina 2008 CLG Report 4. Cahill School, 4924 Eden Avenue 5. Country Club District E. Local Inventories and Studies: • Local Inventory: Historic Building Survey of Edina, MN ", Prepared by Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, July 1979, Historic Consultant, Jeffrey A. Hess. • "Historic Context Study ", Prepared by Robert C. Vogel and Associates, July 1999. • Comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan, June 2006 • Heritage Preservation Element of City's Comprehensive Plan submitted to Metropolitan Council, attached as Exhibit "B" F. Assurances: The HPB held monthly meetings as needed. The minutes of said meetings are recorded and kept at City Hall, Edina, MN. The meetings were posted and open to the public. The assurance statement is attached for Public Participation and Commission records. G. Activities Accomplished in 2008 and Future Projects: 2008 1. The City of Edina contracted with Pathfinder CRM, LLC to provide heritage preservation advice and services. 2. 2008 Heritage Preservation Award — Awarded during Preservation month Edina Morningside Community Church, 4201 Morningside Road The United Church of Christ congregation dates back to 1902 and embodies the history and culture of the Morningside neighborhood. The church endured several significant building projects over its history, with each addition blending seamlessly into the next 3. Revised Comprehensive Preservation Plan for inclusion in City's Comp Plan (Exhibit "B ") 4. Completed a re -survey of 550 homes in the Country Club District. Data was compiled in an excel spreadsheet for future reference. 5. Addressed 11 Certificates of Appropriateness in the Country Club District 3 Edina 2008 CLG Report 6. Certificate of Appropriateness was approved for the rehabilitation of the Browndale Bridge. Work was completed with oversight of City staff. 7. Adopted a revised Plan of Treatment for the Country Club District (see attached Exhibit "C ") taking into consideration research results and neighborhood concerns. Future Projects • Study multiple property designation for Morningside's bungalow properties • Develop a comprehensive preservation education and outreach program aimed at property owners, realtors, developers and others • Work with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to study the 'feasibility of reconstructing the Edina Mill and rehabilitating the historic Mill Pond • Compile a heritage resource library to be housed at City Hall • Designate at least 2 new Edina Heritage Landmark properties • Research potential properties for heritage landmark designation • Enhance Heritage Preservation sections on the City's web site Prepared by: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner and Staff supporting the Heritage Preservation Board. 4 Annual HPB /CLG Report Edina HPB Assurances 2008 Fiscal Year January 6, 2008 1. I hereby certify that the Edina Heritage Preservation board has adhered to the public participation provisions as stipulated under Section D of the "Procedures for Applying for and Maintaining Certified Local Government Status" issued by the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. 2. 1 hereby certify that the Edina Heritage Preservation Board has adhered to the "Procedures for the Proper Disposal of Government Records' pursuant to Minnesota Statute 138.17 (See Appendix C of "Procedures for Applying for and Maintaining Certified Local Government Status'). ayor, City of