Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-02-03_COUNCIL MEETINGe AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 3, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009 II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - as per Pre -list dated January 21, 2009, Total: $46,138.00 ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009 and Town Hall Meeting of January 27, 2009 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings, " the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. Agenda/Edina City Council February 3, 2009 Page 2 A. PUBLIC HEARING ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NO. S -101 - France Avenue South Sidewalk - Resolution No. 2009 -18 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve B. PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL SITE PLAN - Aloft Hotel/Wayzata Properties, 4900 Viking Drive, Resolution No. 2009- 19(Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING ON APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY - Chuck E Cheese - Sale of Alcohol to Underage Person (Favorable majority vote of Council Members present to approve) 111. PUBLIC COMMENT During "Public Comment, " the City Council will invite comments from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on tonight's agenda. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was held by the Council within the last thirty days or a matter scheduled for a future hearing on a specific date. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. IV. AWARD OF BID * A. Ambulance Remount - Fire Department * B. 2009 Chevrolet Silverado Pick Up - Braemar Arena * C. Replacement of Pamela Park Playground Equipment V. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. West 70th Street Study Advisory Committee Presentation B. Resolution No. 2009 -20 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) C. First Reading Ordinance No. 2009 -3 Amending Section 1020 False Alarms (First Reading requires favorable majority of Council Members to approve; Waiver of Second Reading requires favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) * D. Set Hearing Dates For Planning Items (02117/09) 1. Appeal of Variance Denial, 6120 Brookview Avenue, JMS Custom Homes 2. Conditional Use Permit, Edina School District, 5701 Normandale Road, Construct New Maintenance Building E. Resolution No. 2009 -13 Findings Granting Variance 5349 Kellogg Avenue Agenda/Edina City Council February 3, 2009 Page 3 F. Memorandum of Understanding - Bloomington Public Health G. T- Mobile Antenna at Pamela Park VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated January 21, 2009 TOTAL $538,102.75; and dated January 29, 2009 TOTAL $1,145,157.68. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Tues Feb 3 Tues Feb 3 Mon Feb 16 Tues Feb 17 Tues Feb 24 Tues Mar 3 Mon Mar 16 Tues Mar 17 Tues Mar 24 Tues Apr 7 Tues Apr 21 Wed Apr 22 Tues Apr 28 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Work Session- Joint Meeting with Planning Comm. 5:30 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. PRESIDENT'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Annual Meeting Of Boards & Commissions 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Study Session - To be determined 7:00 A.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Volunteer Recognition 5:00 P.M. Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS WARREN HYDE CLUBHOUSE COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINBOROUGH PARK COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 20, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Housh for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson,, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 2009 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for January 6, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director R55CKREG -'620000 . CITY 01 :► 1/21. 7:53:40 Council Check Register Page - 1 1/22/2009 — 1/2212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14019 1/2212009 100668, URS CORPORATION 46,138.00 PROMENADE PLANSB SPECS 203927 3733871 9132.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT 46,138.00 46,138.00 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 46038.00 Total Payments 46,138.00 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 46,138.00 Report Totals 46,138.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belieft that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pplicle� and procedures 1/21/2009 7:53:45 Page - 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 20, 2009 7:06 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda with the exception of Item 5.C., Resolution No. 2009 -12, Calling Public Hearing for Vacation of a Portion of Belmore Lane (02/17/09). Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 2009, AND WORK SESSION OF JANUARY 6, 2009, APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 6, 2009, and Work Session of January 6, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON APPEAL OF VARIANCE DENIAL — 5349 KELLOGG AVENUE — VARIANCE GRANTED DECISION OF ZONING BOARD OVERTURNED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Assistant Planner Presentation Assistant Planner Aaker presented the appeal of Alyssa and Jon Hammar to the Zoning Board's denial of their .9 -foot side yard setback variance and a -219 square -foot lot coverage variance. She displayed a map depicting the location of the home, presented exterior elevations, and a survey illustrating the building footprint and area of the proposed addition to the kitchen area, resulting in the need for the two variances. Ms. Aaker stated the maximum coverage allowed for the lot was 2,250 square feet. The existing structures cover 2,292 square feet, approximately 42 square feet over the allowed maximum. The proposed addition would increase the lot coverage to 2,511 square feet, or 261 square feet over the maximum allowed. The Zoning Board unanimously supported approval of the side yard variance but not all supported the lot coverage variance. Ms. Aaker advised that since two voted in support and two voted against, the variances were denied since there was not a majority to carry the motion. In response to Council's questions, Ms. Aaker explained how lot coverage was calculated and described the two tiers of consideration based on property size. It was noted the current kitchen was small and the interior size could not be increased because of the stairway location that accessed the downstairs. Proponent Presentation Jon Hammar, applicant, stated that the Zoning Board was short one member the night their variance was considered, resulting in a two -two tied vote. He explained their galley kitchen was 9 by 15 feet and not large enough to serve their growing family of five. As mentioned, it cannot be expanded into the interior of the home due to the location of stairway and a hallway that exits the home. Mr. Hammar described the home renovation completed by the previous owner that incorporated a decorative portico that was not suitable for living or storage. He explained their consideration to create additional bedrooms as a second story but instead decided to save the front fagade and portico. He stated the variance process was available to be a "safety valve" to consider unique situations. He believed their requested variances, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings since it would maintain a modest single - family home in a similar neighborhood. The proposed kitchen would tuck into an existing notch in the back wall of the home and be barely visible to neighboring homes. Mr. Hammaer commented on the nearby larger -sized Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 homes that do not fit the character of their neighborhood. He believed that maintaining the single - story roofline was in keeping with the neighborhood. In response to Council's question regarding the undue hardship test for reasonable use, Mr. Hammar noted they did not change the footprint of the home when the bedrooms were added and the staircase was not changed, which provided the only access to the basement. He stated there was no way to create more interior useable space for their galley kitchen. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. Public Testimony Rick Fergesen, 5351 Kellogg Avenue, stated his support for the requested variances. Scott Libbey, 5341 Kellogg Avenue, spoke in support of the requested variance. Quin Scott, 5307 Kellogg Avenue, spoke in support of the requested variance. He also stated as a licensed architect his opinion of the requesti-Lmeeting statutory requirements for issuance of a sari na ce Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the importance of the lot coverage restriction. Ms. Aaker advised that three lot coverage variances had been issued in this neighborhood, one to conform to City Code for a 'two -car garage, and another created a cantilevered staircase to a second story addition. She explained the proponent could a construct second story but there would be sideyard setback issues if the second story living area extended out to the sidewalls of the first floor. City.Attorney Knutson advised that if desired, a condition could be placed on the requested variance to not allow any second story expansion. Member Swenson stated she would not support the lot coverage variance and expressed reluctance with placing an encumbrance on a property that would restrict a new owner from having a second story. She stated even without the carport, the proponent exceeded the lot coverage restriction. Member Housh stated he supported the lot coverage variance, feeling the City should when possible allow residents to maintain an existing home or rehabilitate older homes instead of demolishing and rebuilding. He noted the sideyard setback was not significant and agreed the portico should not count as lot coverage. Member Housh pointed out that the home owner could demolish and rebuild a two - story home with more livable space; ,however, such a home might not fit into the neighborhood. Member Bennett noted that two of the three variances cited by Assistant Planner Aaker clearly addressed hardship. She stated that she took seriously the recommendations of the Planning Commission, Zoning Board, and staff and that the Zoning Board members who had voted to deny the lot coverage variance also were members of the Planning Commission. Shea stated that when she has voted against the recommendations of staff, the Planning Commission or, Zoning Board, she has done so to limit variance from the zoning code. Member Bennett stated she had viewed the subject house from the front and side and noted there was a larger profile from the side and back. Member Bennett acknowledged that this was a difficult situation and while she understood the constraints with older homes, she would not support the lot coverage variance in this instance. Member Brindle noted the addition would not extend beyond the north wall and was of a low profile. She felt the addition would not be noticeably different and complimented the designers for creating an Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20. 2009 addition allowing space for people to be more comfortable yet small enough to not be noticed. Member Brindle stated she would support the variances requested. Mayor Hovland stated this was the first matter heard post massing ordinance to maintain the integrity of neighborhoods but allowed people to live in a modern way. He indicated the Hammaer's proposed addition would maintain the neighborhood's character. Mayor Hovland stated he would vote in support of the variance with the conditions of no building above the carport or change in the roofline for a second story. Mr. Knutson advised that the Council had the discretion to attach conditions. If approved, the proponent could choose to build with conditions attached or to not build because of the conditions. If the house were torn down, the owner could rebuild without expanding, and a second story would be an expansion. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant the requested variances for 5349 Kellogg Avenue overturning the denial by the Zoning Board of Appeals and directing staff to prepare Resolution No. 2009 -13 with the necessary findings of fact, and the following conditions: no future building would occur over the carport area, and no change would be allowed in the roofline for a second floor. Resolution No. 2009 -13 shall be placed on the Council's Consent Agenda on February 3, 2009. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Swenson Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -14 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -17 ADOPTED GRANTING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PRELIMINARY REZONING AND AMENDMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — YMCA. 7355 YORK AVENUE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the two- phased redevelopment of the YMCA site at 7355 York Avenue to construct a new 73,000 square -foot facility and temporary parking area to the south while the existing YMCA remained open. Once the new YMCA was completed, the old facility would be torn down and the rear parking deck and a four -story apartment building constructed. The apartr^ would have ° All apartments would be accessible, with universal design, 80th of them would be priced with affordable rents, and 50% would be reserved for tenants with disabilities. The applicant had originally contemplated an eight -story apaFtment building but given Council direction and Code requirements, the plan was revised to four stories. Mr. Teague advised of the number of variances being requested for setbacks that would be considered by the Zoning Board during the second phase. Mr. Teague said the original application demonstrated adequate parking. He noted the Planning Commission had reviewed the proposal and requested increasing green space, which eliminated eight parking stalls along the east line, bringing the number six below the requirement. The applicant had indicated the parking stalls would be made up with proof of parking. Mr. Teague said a traffic study concluded that 326 parking spaces would provide enough parking for this site. Mr. Teague presented the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from Quasi - Public to Mixed Use to allow the residential use and rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5 (MDD -5). A Conditional Use Permit for private recreational facility and an Overall /Final Development Plan would be needed. Mr. Teague sta## reviewed the following issues: was the Comprehensive Plan Amendment reasonable for this site, was the MDD -5 Zoning District appropriate for the site, and were the variances justified. He stated staff concluded the proposal was reasonable because the proposed mixture of uses would be compatible within the area; the project would encourage pedestrian movement throughout the development; the project would use sustainable development principles; the City would benefit from a Page 3 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /January 20. 2009 new and improved YMCA facility; the existing roadways would support the project; the proposed affordable housing units would help the City achieve its established goal with the Met Council to provide 212 additional affordable housing units by the year 2030; and, the proposed density of 22 units per acre met the City's Code requirement for density in .a MDD -5 Mixed -Use District. Staff believed that MDD -5 was appropriate for the site and the variances were justified and met the three hardship tests. He described the extenuating circumstances with the right -of -way adjacent to the property line to the south and amount of separation from the paved surface to the lot line. In terms of building coverage, 28% would be covered with the YMCA and apartments;l and the floor area ratio was 81 %. Mr. Teague reviewed the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission and advised it unanimously recommended approval. He stated staff recommended approval of the project subject to the finding that the Guide Plan change was consistent with the adjacent land uses; the apartments were consistent with the multiple family housing developments to.the south and west; the Guide Plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety and welfare; the City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility and the ' site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi - Public; the affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 additional affordable housing units by 2030; and the existing roadways would support the proposed project. Proponent Presentation Anita Lancello- Bydlon, Yom? Vice President of New Development, explained their mission to improve aef nd change people's lives as they had done for 143 years in the Minneapolis area. She indicated the YMCA's facilities were the tool used to change peoples' lives, and added Edina's current facility was built in 1974, was dated, and inefficient in its use. Ms. Lancello - Bydlon described their partnerships and collaborations with Andover and Elk River building two facilities with the respective cities covering financing, land, and some 'amenities. She said the Y had developed collaboration with CommonBond and the MS Society, which created synergy to serve and meet individual's needs. She advised that more than $16 million would be invested in the new facility to serve people of Edina and surrounding communities. She asked for the Council's support as they continue to build strong people in this community. Greg Hanks, Sou�t�hdald YMCA Executive Director, stated the Southdale YMCA had been an active and vital organization,,1by s _, _ accommodating 40,000 visits in December of 2008. The YMCA had a membership of 14,000 people and also served 15,000 nonmember participants in other: programs. He described the different program components and services offered, noting the YMCA was different because it continued to be a community service agency. Mr. Hanks stated this project was a great opportunity to reach out to new people and remain a vital and vibrant part of Edina and surrounding communities. Greg Fenton, BWB Architects, presented the aerial photographs of the subject site, noting access points and advising there would be 20% more programmable space in the new facility. He described the 130 apartment units proposed by CommonBond and single deck parking structure with direct access to both the YMCA and housing. Mr. Fenton provided an overview of the project phases and advised that sustainable design would be a big component. He stated they would work.to address the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission to create a streetscape environment with a visible entry point from York Avenue, develop greater connection from inside to outside, and analyze and enhance pedestrian access. With regard to the variance requests, they had provided graphics to demonstrate the impact, of the MDD -5 zoning, noting the project set aside 35 % of the site for setbacks. The site was unique with right -of -way dedicated and permanent on the south side and on Xerxes where additional landscaping would be provided. Mr. Fenton noted that the City's setback contradicted developing a streetscape experience on York Avenue. He stated they were not looking to change the classification but believed there were unique aspects of the site, and under the City's PCD -3 zoning district there was language to consider setback exceptions allowing the creation of an active pedestrian environment. The applicant was not. requesting decreased setbacks to gain project density. Mr. Fenton stated the YMCA was a vital community asset and would expend greater dollars to stay open during construction to provide programs to the community. He stated that sustainable Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 design and goals would be put into place as the project entered design development. Mr. Fenton displayed a drawing of the first floor elevation, described the level of security it would contain, showed pictures of the additional landscaping proposed, and presented a computerized aerial -fly around of the site. Ellen Higgins, CommonBond; Development and Acquisition Activities, briefed the Council on their mission, local and regional accomplishments, and collaboration between CommonBond, YMCA and MS Society. Their mission was to build community by building quality and affordable housing as a stepping stone to success to transform lives by providing stable homes with commitment to community. CommonBond had been in business for 38 years, grown to be the largest provider of affordable housing in the Midwest, was committed to owning, operating, and running the housing units, and provided resources to assure residents were successful members of the community. Ms. Higgins described their three housing communities: Yorkdale Townhomes for family housing, Summit Point - a senior housing community, and Southhaven offering affordable apartments for seniors. All units were fully occupied with a long waiting list, which attested to the desirability of Edina and their management. Their primary strategy was to do more collaborative partnerships with agencies like the YMCA and MS Society that better defined services to the community. They had identified a strong need for 100 accessible rental apartments located in the Southdale corridor adjacent to fitness and wellness facilities, public transportation, and metro mobility services. They proposed a four -story building with 130 units: 50% for people with disabilities, 80% affordable, and 20% market rate. Of the affordable units, they proposed designating 20% for those of 30% Median lincome and another 60% for those making between 50% and 60% of Median Incomes. Ms. Higgins explained how the development costs of about $22 million would be financed. Ms. Higgins advised this would not be subsidized housing but would set rental levels to various income percentages. Residents would be a mix of persons with disabilities, individuals without disabilities, seniors, singles, and households with families because it reflected the reality of the community. The accessible housing was affordable, and CommonBond was working closely with the MS Society and Minnesota Consortium for People with Disabilities. Ms. Higgins stated it was not believed there would be a traffic impact since the targeted rental community used public transportation and Metro Mobility. Ms. Higgins advised that statistics showed their communities did not generate any more crime than what occurred in other communities. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:36 p.m. Public Testimony Cindy Leffler, 7401 York Terrace, stated she had no problem with the YMCA proposal but took issue with the proposed housing. She presented pictures showing the unobstructed view from her property as it existed today and demonstrated how her view would be restricted should the apartments be constructed. Ms. Leffler felt a better solution would be to relocate the driveway and locate a smaller complex next to the skate park or on York Avenue. Ms. Leffler expressed concern over traffic, increased crime and potential loss of property value. Jerry Leffler, 2178 Irving Avenue, Minneapolis, expressed concern over the size of the proposed development and asked questions over 'how many units were to be for persons with MS since the percentage appeared to have changed. He also indicated traffic concerns especially with related to the reopening of the 76th Street Bridge. Maureen Reeder, President of the National MS Society, described the positive experience the MS Society hads in previous projects such as the Kingsley Commons Apartments, working with Common Bond. She urged the Council to favorably consider the proposal. Tim Brausen, 8301 Virginia Circle North, St. Louis Park, stated he represented Isaiah, an ecumenical organization of about 100 churches in the Metro and St. Cloud region. He also, spoke of positive Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20. 2009 dealings with CommonBond and housing projects and urged the Council to favorably consider the Y's proposal. Susan gi4i ref Stellmacher,I MS activist, 4550 Humboldt Avenue, Apt 104, Minneapolis, stated she was happy to speak on behalf of people who struggled to find accessible and affordable housing. She explained that in 2006, she had been diagnosed with worsening MS and the MS Society, Minnesota Chapter, and CommonBond had come to her rescue. She currently lived at Kingsley Commons in a two - bedroom apartment that was 100, /o accessible.and safe with a'^" ~°"'+~^°r° .,r^..mdeF ^^ °* ^ff a healthcare provider on site 24 hours a day_, seven days 'a week should a resident need help. Ms. �ta� Stellmacher, stated she hoped the Council would remember people who need affordable and accessible housing and approve this project. Tamara Webb, 7527 York Avenue South, Yorkdale Townhomes, stated she was a member of the YMCA and a five -year resident.. She stated she loves Edina, the closeness of services; and school her daughter attended. Ms. Web stated her support for housing with a mix of families, seniors, and people with MS and the YMCA proposal. Terry Becker, 5119 Green Farms Road, stated he believed this was a great opportunity for Edina. He noted there had been a lot of talk about partnerships and collaborations and, as Chairman of. the Board and member of the Capital Campaign Committee, he knew a lot of partnerships were involved through service organizations like the Rotary, Lions, Optimists, and also corporate gifts, foundation gifts, and personal giving. Mr. Becker stated there was a lot of support in Edina to see this project happen. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, stated he felt the project as proposed was too dense for the site. He felt the jadgment shew`ng' t se t of undue hardship to justify variances under Code was iRsuff4Gient not em t. Mr. Bohan noted the Zoning Board had not yet acted on the variance requests. He added he believed the Council should not act on the proposal until the Zoning Board. had acted on any necessary variances. Floyd Grabiel, 4817 Wilford Way, noted that each time the City considered multi- housing proposals, it asked the developer to provide affordable housing, and this application would provide a lot of affordable housing. He stated it was not a perfect proposal, but would be good for the City, the YMCA, and the people who needed affordable housing. Mr. Grabiel stated it was wrong to imply that people who do not have as much money were inclined to be criminals, noting there were many recent examples of the extremely wealthy being indicted for crimes against people. He stated support for the preliminary consideration and asked the Council to favorably consider the project. Peter Jarvis, 1016 Coventry Place, agreed the variance procedure was awkward but stated he found it to be an ironic twist that the City's setback requirements make 38% of the site nonbuildable e because it was beamed bordered by three public rights -of -way. Mr. Jarvis urged the Council to favorably consider the Y's proposal. Harold Mezile, 5421 Malibu Drive, President of. YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis, urged the Council's support. He advised 04is Southdale YMCA. was the most successful YMCA in the State based on the volume of people served and the size of the budget. Mr. Mezile stated this YMCA served people of all ages and income groups, reached out to youth, and those with special needs. He described the exceptional next- generation YMCAs that had been constructed in other communities and stated that Edina deserved an outstanding YMCA to serve people on a continuous basis. Mr. Mezile stated the addition of CommonBond made it a fabulous and unique project and a model for the future to serve people with all kinds of needs. He urged the Council to approve this unique proposal. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 In response to Council's questions, Mr. Teague advised that a re- zoning to MDD -5 was the applicant's request and staff felt it an appropriate zoning designation for a minimum lot size being five acres to address infill of smaller sites. The Council addressed the sequencing of variance consideration occurring after the Council's consideration of the preliminary application. Mr. Teague explained that features of the project change between preliminary and final approval. If variances were approved at the preliminary stage, the building location and height would be locked in without flexibility. In addition, if the Council does not approve the preliminary application, there was no need for the Zoning Board to consider variances. The Council's discussion included: that the density of 22 units per acre was in keeping with other area densities and was within the Code requirements, the Code limitation of four stories, the need to address the safety of left -turn movements from the north access point onto York Avenue, the number of units that will be designed for people with disabilities and the number of units that will be set aside for them, and the need for a morp firm firmer commitment beyond a "target" or "goal" that at least 50% of the units would be rented to persons or families with disabilities. Ms. Higgins explained the goal of CommonBond was to keep it at 50% or more. However, in financing negotiations with equity investors, national syndicators buy the credits and always use the "what if' scenario; i.e., if there were no people with disabilities needing an apartment, the apartment would be left open. They need to consider underwriting the worst risk scenario. The Council indicated it had a keen interest in providing affordable senior housing, which Ms. Robinson had testified was a targeted group. Ms. Higgins assured the Council they would work to provide a mere firm firmer commitment and the Council's comments may give them negotiating "ammunition" when talking to investors, that communities were requesting it of them. The Council referenced the number of police calls, HUD housing restrictions, and questioned the renter screening process used by CommonBond. Ms Higgins stated the process was fairly uniform throughout their 107 communities. They followed a strict process for infraction of leases and eviction if there was no way to stabilize the family. There was no automatic eviction because their Advantage Service component provided a more compassionate review from service providers to examine what was happening and work with the property managers to understand the circumstances. However, the safety of residents and stability of the housing trumped all else. Ms. Higgins stated that as at Kinglesy Commons, a healthcare provider would be available on site 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and they would work with the MS Society and residents to identify the appropriate caregiver. The Council addressed aspects of the YMCA's building design including the connection to the outside, need for building security, safety in the aquatic center, safety of people arriving from the bus stop who use the baGk doe must walk around the building to the entrance, need for an entrance from York Avenue, and that the lower level does not have an elevator to gain access to the main lobby. Mr. Fenton explained that accessibility codes would de not require an elevator in that location but the design had not reached that level of detail with the schematics. The Council reviewed the location of interior doors, outside access points for those arriving on foot, and use of interior spaces. Moron explained the Feems would be used- Mr YMCA fi,nntenmr, rn thp dnnrr, M ere Mr. Fenton acknowledged this issue would need to be reviewed further. The Council next addressed on -site circulation and noted several locations of conflicting vehicle and pedestrian movements. Mr. Fenton used the site plan to identify the location of the two- directional drop -off area and described the counterclockwise and clockwise circulation to leave the site or park in the deck. The main level of the apartments and YMCA were on the same elevation. With regard to pedestrians crossing two -way traffic to gain access to the YMCA, Mr. Fenton stated it was a 24 -foot narrow two - directional lane, similar to shopping centers. He advised that Hennepin County had studied the existing conditions, traffic study, and on -site circulation and indicated it would be an improvement because the new site plan would provide on -site stacking space. In response to Council's questions on the number of surface parking spaces, Mr. Fenton stated the surface parking as well as the upper deck was unassigned and available to both residents and users of the YMCA. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 Member Housh introduced Resolution No, 2009 -14, Approving a Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi - Public to Mixed Use for the YMCA at 7355 York Avenue, and Resolution No. 2009 -17, Approving a Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for the YMCA site at 7355 York Avenue, with the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi - Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 additional affordable housing units by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approvals subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be.generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 29, 2008 and December 5, 2008. 2. Sustainable design - the design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on page A11 of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. 4. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. S. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 6. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be paved and meet all minimum requirements of the City Engineer. 7. The temporary parking lot shall be reviewed by the City Park Board during the Final Development Plan process. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at the applicant's cost. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. 9. The design must be modified to address York Avenue, to meet the spirit of the ordinance which encourages a project to create a more active pedestrian involvement with the street. Member Swenson seconded the motion. The Council discussion included: the need for the applicant to address the concerns raised by the Planning Commission in October, function as well as appearance, how to better engage the street for an entrance from York Avenue at the northwest corner, serious on -site circulation issues, ingress and egress issues, strengthening the percentage of housing for persons with disabilities, and whether the option had been considered to locate residential on the north rather than the south. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -15 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND VARIANCE — TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS, 4010 65 T11 STREET WEST Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 Mr. Teague stated the final development plan had been approved about six months ago and the applicant was now requesting an amendment to make the following changes: enlarge the drive entrance on the east side of the building to allow easier and safer turning area into the building (required a ten foot variance on both this property and Fairview Southdale parking ramp to the east), revise landscaping along the north lot line with trees planted in the Mn /DOT right -of -way to avoid underground utility lines, revised the storm water storage system, increased the parking ramp stair tower height by two feet two inches to accommodate structural clearances, and revise the building material from architectural precast to brick on the fourth level. Staff appealed the Zoning Board recommendation for approval so the Council could take action on all of the items. A hardship was found due to the odd shape of the lot and narrow west side, the high water table preventing underground parking, and it was felt the building was reasonably sized meeting the intent. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the amended site plan and the Zoning Board approved the variances. The Council discussed concern with the longevity of evergreen trees when planted along a highway and whether the applicant could be charged with the responsibility of periodic inspection. Public Works Director Houle advised of Mn /DOT's cooperative landscape program and that the evergreen trees planted adjacent to Tracy Avenue have survived. Proponent Presentation Mark Hansen, Mohagen and Hansen Architectural Group, described the challenges this project had presented and five issues under consideration. He advised that the owner had negotiated a land lease with Twin City Orthopedic and Fairview Hospital to allow for easier access. Mr. Hansen presented a diagram showing a truck turning radius from 56th Street and described how deliveries would be made, creating more safety for vehicles and pedestrians. With regard to landscaping, during development of the project concerns were raised with the underground utilities along the north property line. Because the building had been pushed to the north to provide additional landscaping space along 56th Street, they developed an easement to bury utilities and reached agreement with Mn /DOT to develop a landscaping area on their right -of -way. Due to the structural capacity of the slab, changes were made to the storm water management system. Mr. Hansen described how the new system would operate in a similar manner, noting it would still have the same result and harvest water for the irrigation system. He explained that due to the depth of the beams, a portion of the stair tower on the west side was raised but the center portion of the building was lowered by one foot. Mr. Hansen displayed a drawing of the exterior elevation and noted the area on the penthouse where brick would replace architectural precast. The Council questioned the bank of windows in the stairwell tower. Mr. Hansen advised the windows were a screening element for the antennas. With regard to the loss of 1600 feet of green space, Mr. Hansen advised there was no other opportunity to create additional green space on the site. Mr. Houle stated staff had reviewed the change in the stormwater management system and were working with the Watershed District and Barr Engineering to assure it met the City's requirements. The Council questioned the height of the stairwell. Mr. Hansen explained the stair tower on the west side was at 58 feet 8 inches and would be modified to 60 feet 6 inches. The highest point was in the middle of the structure at 82 feet 8 inches. He advised they have received a letter from the Nine Mile Watershed District indicating this concept satisfied their requirements. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:26 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2009 -15, Approving an Amended Final Development Plan with Variances for Twin Cities Orthopedics and Southdale Fairview Hospital, 4010 6e Street West, with the following findings: 1. The amendments do not add any finished square footage to the previously approved plans. 2. The proposed changes to the plan are minimal. Approval of the drive aisle sideyard setback variances from ten feet to zero feet at 4010 65th Street West and 6400 France are based on the following findings: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the size of the approved building on the site, the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The site's high water table prevented the parking from being constructed under ground. 3. The site's location is adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 4. The revised driveway would provide a safe and easy turning radius for delivery trucks driving into the loading area. S. The intent of the ordinance is to provide separation and green space between lots and uses. This site is unique in that it is part of the Regional Medical District, and there would be a pedestrian connection between the parking ramp for the hospital, and the new building. The appearance would be that these uses function together. Approval of the Amended Final Development Plan and variances were subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the previously approved final development plan unless modified below, the plans listed below and the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Landscaping plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped November 26, 2008. 2. The following must be submitted to the City before the City issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the County. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. An executed cross access easement must be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new building. 6. Revised building material from architectural precast to brick on the fourth level, as presented to the Council on January 20, 2009. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 3. 2009 — FINAL SITE PLAN — ALOFT HOTELIWAYZATA PROPERTIES, 5701 NORMANDALE ROAD Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh continuing the public hearing to February 3, 2009 for the final site plan for Aloft Hotel / Wayzata Properties, 5701 Normandale Road. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC COMMENT Page 10 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 Diane Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, noted that several proposals had been considered at the last Council meeting for interviewing Commissions and Board applicants. She described what she found to be the advantages and disadvantages of the two interview formats previously considered: interview by the full Council, and interview by the Mayor and Chair. Ms. Plunkett Latham proposed a hybrid format with the Commission or Board conducting the first round of interviews and recommending two individuals per opening for Council's consideration. At least three of the Council would interview the recommended candidates, triggering the Open Meeting Law and assuring transparency. *AWARD OF BID — 15 IN -SQUAD VIDEO SYSTEMS — POLICE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for 15 in -squad video systems to the recommended low bidder, Action Fleet, Inc. (ICOP System) at $95,595.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — TORO GROUNDSMASTER 4500 -D ROTARY MOWER — BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for Toro Groundsmaster 4500 -D rotary mower for Braemar Golf Course to the recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing at $37,535.69. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — EDINBOROUGH PARK AIR HANDLING REPLACEMENT Motion was made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for air handling replacement for Edinborough Park to the recommended low bidder, Master Mechanical at $356,700.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -1 ADOPTED — AMENDING UTILITY RATES eff;,__„*+s of NGtiGe presented ,and wdered sinner) nn file. Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates, noted the Council annually reviewed water and sewer utility rates and looked at the future of enterprise funds. In 2006, it was clear that several major capital improvements were necessary and rate increases were needed. It was also clear that the DNR was encouraging cities to find ways to promote conservation of water, particularly in the summer time. As a result, the Council adopted rate tiers to charge more per gallon of water as usage increased. In the past, the City looked at projecting revenues and expenses for debt service and debt costs out 10 to 15 years to determine if plans for capital improvements were moving in the correct direction and rates were correctly laid out. Mr. Ruff advised that rate increases proposed for 2009 were 6.4% increase for water, 4.5% increase for sanitary sewer, and 8% increase for storm sewer costs, or 5.5% increase for the combination of those services. Mr. Ruff presented the issues that were driving the increase in rates including Metropolitan Council's sewer treatment rates and the City's significant capital improvement projects for street reconstruction, replacing water pipes, need to upgrade water treatment facilities, and equipment. The creation of a tiered rate structure was intended to promote conservation and to assure City expenses were supported by revenues. The Council had expressed concern with covering most of the capital costs with debt, which occurred mainly because the City had not developed significant reserves to pay for capital items. Historically, Edina had very low water rates and used reserves instead of debt to pay for costs. Mr. Ruff advised that if the water rate was increased 7% per year instead of 6.4% it would result in $1 million less per year in borrowing. Another option was to move commercial users into the third tier, which would result in a 50% increase of their water rates. Commercial users were a relatively small, 10 -15 % -,, part of the City's total usage, and an increase to the third tier would result in about $1 million per year. However, because of the high percentage of increase to that one sector, they do not recommend that option. If approved, they would recommend commercial users be given advanced notice of a year or longer so it could be accommodated into their budgets. Mr. Ruff advised that when compared to other municipalities, Edina's 2008 rates were in the middle to low middle range. Page 11 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 Finance Director Wallin presented staffs analysis of IVIGFRingside wateF Fates, MIN& was n-enneGted to the MinReapelis water system water rates for Morningside, which was connected to the Minneapolis water system. Edina owns and maintains all water infrastructures (watermains and meters) in the Morningside area, and Minneapolis charged $2.84 per 100 cubic feet in 2008. He advised of the revenues received from Morningside and the administrative costs and expenses. Finance Director Wallin presented the assumptions used for infrastructure costs, cost to replace water meters and maintain watermains, and determination that the estimated costs were greater than the estimated revenues by $14,145 per year. Thus, it would require an increase in the consumption charge of up to 21 cents per 100 cubic feet of usage to offset costs. It was noted this increase was smaller by percentage than the water rate increases the rest of Edina had experienced since 2007. Finance Director Wallin noted Edina buys more water from Minneapolis than it sold. However, this was left out of analysis, because for the last few years Edina had done more hydrant flushes to clean up the brown water issue. The Council discussion included: Need for additional analysis of the history and cost of water utility capital projects and the relative percentage of capital costs related to the system components shared citywide, i.e. water mains and water meters. Finance Director Wallin stated some watermains have involved additional costs so each specific project would have to be looked at to assure an apples -to- apples comparison. Council indicated staff's analysis to support the fees and charges were was well done and it was important to be able to justify to Morningside residents that they were fairly told what te pay charged for their contribution to the City's capital costs, considering Council assurance with the approval of the water main relining project that project costs would not be passed on to the neighborhood. GGRsideFiRg it on the basis ef a Staff was asked if Morningside residents would have been assessed for physical improvements. Finance Director Wallin explained utilities were assessed when a neighborhood was first developed. However, typically repairs to the system were part of the usage charge. He advised that approximately efle -mod of the usage rhaFge was fGF Edina one -third of the Edina water usage charge was directed to Edina's water infrastructure, compared with $.02 of the Morningside water usage charge. Council noted that according to staff's analysis, the fixed rate charge paid by Morningside and Edina water customers covered the City's administrative costs in full, leaving approximately two- thirds of each fixed rate charge to be applied to the City's capital expenses. Council requested that staff return at its convenience with an analysis of water utility capital projects costs and the percentage of those costs related to water mains and water meters., and stated that water rates for Morningside would be amended after Council reviewed the additional information. Member Housh made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2009 -1, Amending Utility Rates with the amendments as noted at the antra ^• 20, 2009y, meeting deleting #2 under Water Service and renumbering #3, #4 & #4 to #2, #3 & #4. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -11 APPROVED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson and Member Bennett seconded a motion adopting Resolution No. 2009 -11 accepting various donations. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 12 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -12 ADOPTED — CALLING PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF BELMORE LANE ON FEBRUARY 17, 2009 The Council questioned the timeliness for setting this public hearing since the architectural plans were not yet definite. Manager Hughes explained that consideration of a vacation had a longer notice requirement. The intent of scheduling the public hearing for February 17 was to track with the CUP public hearing so both issues could be heard at the same time. If the CUP was not available ready to be heard, staff would recommend holding over this public hearing to a later date. Member Bennett introduced Resolution No. 2009- 12, Calling Public Hearing for Vacation of a Portion of Belmore Lane on February 17, 2009. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION DATE SET Mr. Hughes presented the available dates. Following discussion, Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to schedule the Volunteer Recognition Reception on Wednesday, April 22, 2009, at 5:00 p.m. at Edinborough Park. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ANNUAL MEETING DATE DISCUSSED Following discussion, Mr. Hughes stated he would circulate an e-mail of available dates for Council's consideration. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -16 APPROVED — APPROVING HENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY DATA BASE (EPDB) CONDITIONAL USE LICENSE AGREEMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -16, Approving Hennepin County Electronic Proprietary Data Base (EPDB) Conditional Use License Agreement. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPROVED Mr. Teague stated the Gateway Development Agreement was ready for consideration. The Council discussed the cost for the bike trail and questioned the wording of the agreement indicating: "may apply." Public Works Director Houle advised the cost for the trail was not known since a preliminary trail study had not yet been conducted. City Attorney Knutson advised the wording of the agreement was correct as written since the term "may apply" gave them permission to proceed. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Mayor Hovland, to approve the Gateway Development Agreement. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Housh approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 8, 2009, and consisting of 21 pages: General Fund $396,404.57; CDBG Fund $6,967.26; Communications Fund $6,298.13; Working Capital Fund $597.60; Art Center Fund $1,929.02; Golf Dome Fund $2,203.33; Aquatic Center Fund $539.00; Golf Course Fund $11,731.08; Ice Arena Fund $11,488.42; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $19,487.91; Liquor Fund $197,308.48; Utility Fund $10,366.04; PSTF Agency Fund $9,188.79; TOTAL $674,439.63 and for approval of payment of claims dated January 15, 2009, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $385,992.64; Communications Fund $11,774.99; Working Capital Fund $32,572.14; Construction Fund $55,465.82; Art Center Fund $342.55; Aquatic Center Fund $290.18; Golf Course Fund $8,628.52; Ice Arena Fund $3,874.92; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $222,772.25; Liquor Fund $297,769.44; Utility Fund $409,744.79; Storm Sewer $1,808.98; Recycling Fund $35,380.00; PSTF Agency Fund $2,215.95; TOTAL $1,468,633.17, and Credit Card Transactions dated November 26, 2008 to December 26, 2008; TOTAL $5,023.57. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 13 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 20, 2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009 -2013 APPROVED. Mr. Hughes stated the Capital Improvement Program was in final form and staff recommended approval. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve the Capital Improvement Program for 2009 -2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -21 ORDERING FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SIDEWALKS ON SEGMENTS VALLEY VIEW ROAD & NORMANDALE ROAD Following discussion, Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2009 -21, Directing staff to study the feasibility of sidewalks on Valley View Road from Concord Avenue to Normandale Road and on Normandale Road from Valley View Road to Benton Avenue. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. TOWN HALL MEETING FORMAT DISCUSSED The Council discussed and agreed on the format to be used at the January 27, 2009 Town Hall meeting that would start at 11:30 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT MEETING SCHEDULED The Council discussed and asked staff to schedule time to meet with the Planning Commission on February 3, 2009, at 5:30 p.m. WEST 70th STREET STUDY AND PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED The Council agreed to schedule a presentation on the West 70 Street Study on February 3, 2009, and directed staff to schedule the West 70th Street public hearing for the February 17, 2009, meeting. It was agreed to provide public hearing notice through a press release and a mailed notice to the survey area. BOARD & ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT DISCUSSED The Council discussed that some members of advisory boards and commissions were not in compliance with the City's Code on attendance at meetings. It was noted two groups were experiencing difficulty obtaining a quorum. Consensus was that no change be made to the Code and staff should continue notification to any members out of compliance. BOARD & COMMISSION INTERVIEW PROCESS DISCUSSED Mayor Hovland advised of the feedback received since the last meeting regarding the interview process to fill Commission and Board vacancies. It was indicated the interview schedule could be advertised on the City's website and at City Hall. Council consensus was reached that the Mayor and Chair would conduct interviews along with one Member who had served on that Commission, as follows: Member Swenson — Heritage Preservation Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Construction Board of Appeals; Member Bennett — Transportation Commission and Planning Commission; Member Housh Park Board and Energy and Environment Commission; and, Member Brindle — Human Relations Rights & Relations and Community Health Committee There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Page 14 MINUTES OF THE TOWN HALL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 27, 2009 11:30 A.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh and Mayor Hovland. Member Swenson was absent. Mayor Hovland thanked persons for attending. He explained this was the first of what the Edina City Council hoped would be biannual Town Hall Meetings hosted by the Edina City Council. He noted that residents had been asked to complete a card stating their name, address and topic and he would be calling residents to speak by name. Each speaker would be allowed to have three minutes to speak on any issue or concern they wished to aif express. Charles Hughes, 6136 Brookview Avenue, expressed concern about the negative impact the installation of an electric pole had on the property at 6145 Oaklawn Avenue. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, presented ideas about the City utilizing the benefits of solar election and hot water heat on roof tops and she presented her concerns over the preservation of trees, particularly old growth trees. Ms. Westin presented photos and tree preservation ordinances from Lake Forest, Illinois, and Minnetonka, Minnesota. Ms. Westin spoke a second time and shared an anecdote about Mr. T purchasing a property in Lake Forest and clear- cutting the land. More than just trees should be considered; when preservation was reviewed, the entire environment should be considered. Addie Fitzsimmons, 5025 Yvonne Terrace, stated the Sun Current was not always received by her, and she noted difficulty getting needed information from City staff, lack of privacy when making a complaint at City Hall and her experience with an Edina Ambulance crew. Dick Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, expressed concern over a construction matter that would be heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals. He encouraged people to attend the meeting. Sandy Fox, 5801 West 68th Street, expressed concern over the maintenance of Edina's residential streets and their overall decline. She asked how street reconstruction and maintenance were prioritized and noted the streets in her neighborhood were in poor shape. Bruce Kieffer, 5404 Edenmoor Street, suggested that all flat roofs in Edina be required to be green. He also questioned what plans if any the City had for providing Wi -Fi internet services. Mayor Hovland responded. Marie Anderegg, 5848 Creek Valley Road, asked how the City of Edina interacted with other organizations to collaborate on projects directly affecting the Edina community, such as Nine Mile Creek Watershed District or Three Rivers Park District. Mayor Hovland and Member Bennett responded. Wayne Dvorak, 5840 Kellogg Avenue, suggested that City employees not be given wage increases and that there could be staff cuts to more efficiently run the City. He questioned the need for 31 fire fighters. Jane Fuegner, 5225 Kellogg Avenue, thanked the Council for listening to the community when drafting the update to the City's Comprehensive Plan and suggested that the Council consider a Point of Sale inspection program. Ms. Fuegner spoke a second time asking questions about a home sale inspection program. Manager Hughes responded. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 27, 2009 Lonni Skrentner, 5551 Village Drive, questioned the process followed in making appointments to the various advisory boards, commissions and committees. Ms. Skrentner stated she had liked the process instigated in 2008 and was disappointed that a different practice would be followed in 2009. Chris Rof#idal, 5037 West 56th Street, Chair of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board, noted that the stringent attendance policy codified by the Council in 2008 cost his board a very good member. He suggested that room for concessions based upon circumstances be allowed. Mr. Roffidal encouraged investigation of whether web based or conference call attendance could be possible. Jan Ferrell, 4704 West 70th Street, asked why Improvement Project BA313 West 70th and Metro Boulevard had not been built. Ms. Ferrell noted the road had been through many design iterations and expressed concern that it has not been reconstructed and had been moved back to the 2009 Mill and Overlay Project. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, stated he had signed a petition for an improvement project in his neighborhood in 2006. He said that he understood the project would not be constructed until 2010 and asked how the decisions were made for when projects were constructed. Mr. Grotz said politics should not be involved in such decisions and suggested that some type of board could be used. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Drive, presented a letter to the City Council from the Morningside Neighborhood Association with handwritten comments by residents gathered during their winter party. Dick Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, requested that meetings of the Zoning Board of Appeals be videotaped and broadcast so citizens could view the proceedings. Clara Englebert, 6313 Ashcroft Lane, requested that the City consider developing a performing arts venue outside of the theaters in the Edina Public Schools. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:45 p.m Respectfully submitted, Page 2 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk f. 'It fir e � �o o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION �y 1 To: Mayor & City Council Agendaltem # II. A. From: Jack D. Sullivan, PE Consent Assistant City Enginger Information Only ❑ Date: February 3 , 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Receive Revised Feasibility � Action ®To Council Motion Study and for France Avenue Sidewalk Resolution Improvement No. S -101. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Staff believes the project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt the attached Resolution No. 2009 -18, approving France Avenue Sidewalk improvement, City Improvement No. S -101, and authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. Info /Background: This project was initiated by resident petition. The proposed project would involve constructing a concrete sidewalk along the west side of the France Avenue from W. 48th Street to Sunnyside Road. The revised Feasibility Study is included with this report; along with all correspondence received to date. The estimated project cost is $300,000. Municipal State Aid funds would be used to fund the sidewalk improvement project. The original Feasibility Study was presented to Council on November 3, 2008. A public hearing date was set for December' 2, 2008. The public hearing was continued to January 6, 2009 and then again to February 3, 2009. The revised Feasibility Study has been modified to address the existing retaining wall and snow removal issues. GAEngineering \Improvements \S101 West side of France, 48th to Sunnyside \Prelim Design\20090203_RRpublic hearing - S101_.doc REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY - S 101 o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT '• ti�R,�� �y CITY OF EDINA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FRANCE AVENUE SIDEWALK BETWEEN 48TH STREET WEST AND SUNNYSIDE ROAD NOVEMEBER 3, 2008 (REVISED FEBRUARY 3, 2009) LOCATION: The France Avenue Sidewalk Project runs along the west side of France Avenue from 481h Street north up to Sunnyside Road, a distance of 1500 feet. (See Figure 1) Figure 1. Project Area Map ul f ta, .� ' ��I • r 1 _ Protect Area r t`. P France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No: 5101 r�` } ` �� Proposed Sidewalk �• Existing Sidewalk rte_ 1�`- - - -• � „�, \� lP f� M I W+E r: Y[1 r ' ` +.° Engineering Dept October, 2008 Figure 1. Project Area Map Revised Feasibility Study France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101 November 3, 2008 (Revised February 3, 2009) INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition accepted by the City of Edina on October 16, 2007. The petition was signed by 45 . residents living in the surrounding neighborhood. Currently, there are only 43 residents that still reside there and on 12/3/07, one resident wrote in to be removed from the petition. Of the 42 current. signatures, only three residents live directly within the proposed project limits. (refer to the petition of 10/16/2007) Another petition was received on November 12, 2008. This petition includes 58 residents not in favor of the sidewalk. Three reisents who favored the sidewalk on the October 16, 2007 petition retracted their "yes" signatures. (see attachment D) Staff hosted an information meeting on November 19, 2008 that was attended by 19 people representing 16 residences. The following are existing features that were used. in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Missing segment of sidewalk between 48th Street West and Sunnyside Road on west side of France Avenue • Existing fences and walls • Right -of -way issues. • Steep slopes • Existing trees and landscaping. • Safety of residents and children • Location of sidewalk • Snow removal • Existing utility poles located within construction area • Located within a defined business zone • Traffic volume approximately 13,000 vehicles per day EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway is a Hennepin County roadway (CSAH 17) and is a bituminous surface with concrete curb and gutter, approximately 41 feet wide and concrete sidewalk that runs the full length on the east side. The sidewalk on the west extends south of 48th Street West along France Avenue which leads to the 50th and France area. There is also sidewalk -on the west side that extends north of Sunnyside Road along France Avenue which leads to the 44th and France area (see photos 1 and 2). Page 2 of 8 Revised Feasibility Study France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101 November 3, 2008 (Revised February 3, 2009) Photo 1. Looking North on France Avenue Photo 2. Looking North on France Avenue Page 3 of 8 Revised Feasibility Study France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101 November 3, 2008 (Revised February 3, 2009) As seen in Figure 1, the missing segment of sidewalk falls between 48th Street West i Sunnyside Road. Photo 3. South End with Existing Sidewalk Photo 4. North End with Existing Sidewalk PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The France Avenue Sidewalk Improvements would consist of a 5 foot wide cone. walk with a 2 foot exposed concrete buffer (see photo 5), from 48th Street north to Sunnyside Road on the west side of the road. (See Figure 1) Currently, there is concrete curb and gutter and the sidewalk will be constructed with little disturbance to the existing concrete curb and gutter. Photo 5. Behind the Curb Style Sidewalk Page 4 of 8 Revised Feasibility Study France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101 November 3, 2008 (Revised February 3, 2009) There are a number of utility poles that are located within the construction area that will need to be relocated by Xcel Energy. Along the block, between 47th and 48th Street, there are approximately 20 "volunteer" trees (mostly elm trees) ranging in diameter from 4" to 18" that will need to be removed. A "volunteer" tree is a tree that was not planted by someone. (see photo 6) Photo 6. Potential Tree Removal In the 4700 block of France Avenue there is a combination of a wooden and block retaining wall, wood fence and guardrail (see photo 7 and 8) that will need to be removed and replaced with a updated retaining wall system. . .)to 7. Guardrail /Retaining Wall (France Side) Photo 8. Guardrail /Retaining Wall (House Side) Page 5 of 8 Revised Feasibility Study France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101 November 3, 2008 (Revised February 3, 2009) The proposed retaining wall would be a large gravity block retaining wall similar to retaining wall along the westerly side of 5200 France Avenue, The Brownstones, (see photo 9 and figure 2). Attached to the top of the wall would be a wood fence /guardrail, which would be similar to the existing wood fence. WOOD RUBRAIL /GUARDRAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK GRAVITY BLOCK RETAINING WALL FRANCE AVENUE Photo 9. 5200 France Ave. (Brownstones) Figure 2. Retaining Wall Detail The proposed sidewalk would be maintained by the City, including snow plowing associated general maintenance. However, due to the restricted amount of righ way, a concrete block wall from 4600 to 4612 France Avenue and a wooden fence that extends the entire 4700 block of France Avenue, there is little room for snow storage. The combination of snow from France Avenue, the proposed sidewalk and minimal on -site snow storage for residents at 4620 -4626 France Avenue would likely require Public Works to haul snow from most segments of the proposed walk. (see photos 10 and 11) Photo 10. Snow Storage Issues at 4600 -4612 France Ave. Page 6 of 8 Revised Feasibility Study France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101 November 3, 2008 (Revised February 3, 2009) . 3 HT -O F -WAY & EASEMENTS: Photo 11. Snow Storage Issues at 4620 -4626 France Ave. The proposed sidewalk would also connect to an existing bus stop located in the 4600 block of France Avenue. This project utilizes the existing County owned strip of right -of -way that runs parallel to France Avenue from 48th Street West to Sunnyside Road. The City will work closely with the County for all permits and approvals. All proposed permanent improvements will stay within this right -of -way. A temporary construction easement will be required at 4709, 4711 and 4713 Meadow Road to construct the gravity block retaining wall. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $300,000. The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. Funding for the entire project will come from Municipal State Aid funds since France Avenue is a County State Aid Road. Sidewalk Construction: $170,000 Wood Fence/ Retaining Wall: $ 60,000 Temporary Easements: $ 70,000 Total Cost: $300,000 Page 7 of 8 Revised Feasibility Study France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101 November 3, 2008 (Revised February 3, 2009) ASSESSMENTS: This project is funded through the distribution of the state gas tax; therefore there is no special assessment to property owners. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing ................November 3, 2008 Informational Meeting /Open House ....... .......................November 19, 2008 Receive Revised Feasibility Report ......... .... ....................February 3, 2009 Public Hearing ...... ............................... ........................February 3, 2009 BidOpening ................. ............................... ..........................April 2009 AwardContract .............. ........................... ......................Apray 2009 Begin Construction .... ............................... .........................Summer 2009 Complete Construction ............................... .........................Summer 2009 FEASIBILITY: A number of engineering challenges have been raised; however, these challenges can be overcome in the design, construction and maintenance of the walk to complete the missing segment of sidewalk along France Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: Staff recognizes that the majority of adjacent property owners do not favor this sidewalk; however, staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to create a safe pedestrian link along France Avenue. a. Petition to the City Council - Received October 16, 2007 b. October 16, 2007 Petition Results c. Petition to the City Council - Received November 12, 2008 d. Combined October 16, 2007 / November 12, 2008 Petition Results e. Report/Recommendation to Council f. Resident Letter #1 — Informational Meeting Announcement g. Resident Letter #2 h. Informational Meeting Attendance List i. Public Hearing Notices, Certificate of Mailing j. Resident Letter #3 k. Resident Letter #4 I. Public Hearing Notice — Rescheduled m. Project Comments and Letters Received n. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Sidewalk Facilities Page 8 of 8 to f � � /c�'7 ��.ti�a a ; � p aL zky f S �7 tu,-? Ct "IAI- vs, e Ar A4at(,6mi*-,4 A' D C- / T7 J�-V 4 lL J77 15 ro,i5 F 11 S: TY ST1zF � y- i111r f � au f4 .Ceti > OF r— F-09 dv t-t= /4 v , rV IV f7kmeL^ iff • Wauk, noKN � Sri ,J.}T Gf—(t_Q,C 41-ma -Taw. J. _ G Soarr-marz 11-51.5 Ga kc(&Ie 6-er q W �- `�' 'rs � D� Gr/Xo 474 z W-AknlSOA 'tq0 '( Gtr .gZN-o &- Mras v e.= wmemwr✓ Of ris w qrrfts:�-. f-i9io 432. IN W. meted' - h� r . . f}�kiwc�vr� A -3 •,• qJ r (. r � , 1 X11 ,-rT�r ;:r�Tl�E • • "Jo. . /o d I y h F, �-fA 7- to A Q� t,�ew Co Ire., I c 4� qS2 2� 3 6g z,i s C, Q tn�A L...NVILr.E X52- 3s1- yl(v�1 Kr', sv4 M Pau�.l Qsa -gam- oo g : .s sc �. Y5 qS 4� =�z� 3 A&ct M 4 -4 C •/rL _ � � /]� `. .�l 1L, yF= �_ �7 ! r� C. % � �� C. �� %�/ �1 WT L; A P7 r7 C- ! � . 'ip 1=44 ,�i AU 4 DTI ` TC �,r �g� ST 5 i � �i !� �'� 7,14 Lf '°� /''�'i= �/ �y L;ar� � � F �'!� r�r,�[.0 ,O�''- 4c,�'•� IZr (�.�4LS7' "7,x/5 R �. � r ! 6 A: / /: � ,0.� = i !�'' '� �'Z �-`yT' s'f% :�1/= r =�� 1= ,► i. /�-LL._ 6:`�/ F• � jA.(�� i.2 L /fir rV I Iti;�V Y k3 _- z•1'�� {ice c� f��•4L• �Udt� l � IL tri1- �,�p�tar �0�'1�15 .?C) Clad G Tara T-15 LVAn AUe, yv14; T lev-10cal'k N FIL1116W MVG Sidewalk Petition Results Residents Who Currently Reside -- Address that Signed Petition Da October 16, 2007 Requesting Sidewalk. Signed Yes, but No Longer - - - Reside at Address Shown. Changed Vote N W , E S Engineering Dept. October, 2008 g t 4424 1520 4506 Y'+ � 4406 MEMBER 400+ 4WD .m.nw 1 FZT 7i5W 407! 4001 r4W 4W2 4005 4005 4005 4005 4007 4006 4057 4056 4006 4008 WW 4011 4010 4011 4010 4017 4012 4013 — 4015 4014 q15 4014 4017 4019 4016 4016 4018 4021 40i0 4101 4100 4105 4104 4109 4113 4112 4186 � 4117 4116 4121 4720 4500 wrw e'01..kg -f Y 0 Y� 4 a e 3 a i a O z 0 0 11 r l RECEIVED NOV 111000 November 10, 2008 Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council Edina City Hall Ladies and Gentlemen, We are writing on behalf of ourselves and the neighbors in the White Oaks neighborhood. It has come to our attention that a group of primarily Mornngside residents have petitioned the City to install a sidewalk along the west side of France Avenue from the mid -4500 block through the south end of the 4700 block. We have met as a neighborhood group and found the neighbors to be strongly opposed to said sidewalk. A counter petition, signed by seventy -eight (78) residents of the White Oaks neighborhood, is attached. We have reviewed this issue from several standpoints including environmental, the impact on the Morningside residents, pedestrian and resident safety issues and use of tax dollars. 1. Environmental — Wayne Houle has advised that the installation of a sidewalk is would require removal of all boulevard landscaping in the 4700 block, and possibly some trees in the 4600 block. This would result in the loss of over 25 trees and bushes, with no new landscaping to replace them. In addition, there are a number of trees on private property whose roots systems will be damaged by the installation of the sidewalk and the new retaining wall. As a result, these trees will be weakened and probably die, as happened on Bridge Avenue. The trees provide significant visual and sound screening from France Avenue and the massive utility lines, assist in absorbing pollutants from traffic emissions and provide general green space along France Avenue. The loss of so many trees and green space will be detrimental not only to the property owners along both sides of France Avenue, but also to the White Oaks neighborhood as a whole. 2. Impact on Morning —side Residents — A map showing the location of residences of most of the signors of the petition requesting the sidewalk is attached to this letter. A few signers did not provide an address or phone number and therefore are not shown. In addition, letters from two original signers who have withdrawn their signatures and support our position are also attached. It is notable that over half of the signors live three or more blocks east of France. All but a few households could walk to downtown Edina along Grimes and Arden Avenues, which would provide them with a more attractive, more direct and safer (traffic wise) corridor than walking along France Ave. It should also be noted that there is an existing sidewalk along the entire length of the east side of France Avenue. Mayor Hovland and the City Council Page 2. November 10, 2008 3. Pedestrian Safety Issues — In conversation with White Oaks neighbors, the pedestrian safety raised most frequently was crossing France Ave. Many adults and children from our area need to cross France Avenue, often on a daily basis, to rt to schools, parks and Lake Harriet. A safety cross walk at either 47tb or 48 street would better serve the community than a sidewalk. 4. Resident Safety Issues - There is currently a guard rail in the middle of the 4700 block of France Avenue. The backyards of the houses protected by the guardrail are very shallow, which means that small children are sometimes playing very close to France. The feasibility study indicateg the guard rail will be removed; it says nothing about replacing it. In the event of an accident on France Avenue, children playing in the back yards could be injured or killed. 5. Use of Tax Dollars — We understand that the sidewalk would be paid for out of funds received by the city from the state gas tax fiord. Those dollars are available for roadway construction and projects such as the sidewalk. The proposed $250,000 cost to install the sidewalk will not be available for other necessary projects. In addition, the city will have to assume the cost of plowing and maintaining the sidewalk. The White Oaks neighborhood, the one most directly affected by the proposed sidewalk, is at a loss to understand how the Engineering Department could conclude that a sidewalk that will cost $250,000 for two and one half blocks when there is a sidewalk on the other side of the street is "necessary" or "cost effective ". For all of the reasons set forth above, we request that the sidewalk not be installed and that the city explore instead the feasibility of installing a pedestrian crosswalk at 47a' or 48m Streets across France Avenue. On behalf of the signors of the accompanying petition, we are Sincerely, o'D t� 0-10� Mike Casserly and Karin Wille 4701 Meadow Road 952/924 -0700 Encl. — 7 pages signed petitions - Map of signers of original petition - Letters from M. Opp and F. Kraft requesting their name be withdrawn from petition requesting sidewalk C A-ifm(-Ax4eA4Cr� October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th Street and 48th Street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install'and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name Signature -- CkQ r�aN 1����ohc►_� Address _`_ - -- -- — --- - - - - -- l _ i Li701 Mto.J'0� '07 M iah a T � Ave � F�4 It n 5c o-ly ry ff. Y ?>'#.t. rDJAW�s L4 G o D70 k-�n E�1. V-0 0 z 13 �i 3 s y 5 0 October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th Street and 48t' Street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. __._.._.._ _.... Address Printed Name .0 XI z C� ` Signature ff�eP�_... _... 3 jj ....... _...�^A. Iq Cr .._...r I, tt 1.1c ' �t...... .:......:..... _. _r. __ _........_....� �0 ��........ _.. _ .... LA WOAV-',�zqzb c�s5 c october 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 40 Street and 48`h Street on the west side of France Avenue. instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47h or 48!' Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance. the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name �� ^tip Lax+doh �� M ► R 7-A 50 ti & 1 e%Icw- Signature �-y� r�,o► � y � P� OfT Address 1-713 2.4 1713 AeaX6-O f , 4-vo-? -b WV-" 6 - • Z.s FA X832 TbO nc% `- L4 YIL, �r�rr -s' 2.D 2 7 ` yi(Ji W. q8"'' ST-. �o y Goo 16 u,%tw 20 44 `lO a 3L October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 40 street and 4e street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47"' or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name IDs'^ ...._... _ _-D.. n_w.. ddress s ' 33 7 ,�,ziOG,f Z4LxLO IT . 3� &�e L 3t c� / P 2r 1� ..._ . Vila I lace, ..:. 4 Vie. 1 _ �-tojv,es �tZ. � ., ....... . L LV Ct- �Aj tetj SUJZJW�1. zi Fe AM-A,Ao-vea c -t October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalkbetween 44th Street and 48' Street on the west side of France Avenue. instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47th or 48th Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name i Signature r _ Address f� 5b Ra- A C 43 y� ,00aaci-_ we AIL October 28, 2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44`h street and 48th street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead, we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either 47`h or 48`h Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. Printed Name Signature ;Address - - -- i i aralatl S� IO�% aw en '_.._�f _. ' 4 �3`�/3 W TS _ -- - – - — i !3 E7p��t yBal_Terw>7-es C 5° SL • Gd s, VT _ areL A J ev a � Orl ell, Page 1 v - Page 1 October 28,'2008 Petition to the Mayor of Edina and City Council Members: We, the undersigned, request that the City of Edina not install a sidewalk between 44th street and 48th street on the west side of France Avenue. Instead , we request that the city determine the feasibility of installing a crosswalk on France Avenue at either-47 yr 48`b Street in order to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross France Avenue safely, either to join with the existing sidewalk on the east side of France or to get to schools, Pershing Park and Lake Harriet. Compared to the sidewalk, we believe the crosswalk would cost taxpayers less to install and maintain, would enhance the safety of walkers and bicyclists more, and would allow more green space and a significant number of trees to be retained, thereby reducing noise and emission pollution from France Avenue. _... qza 47al 4) Y I Y �1 1 7 // .-�1 'k *a C -.. Address Printed Na m e Signature Google Maps Fage 1 of 3 A AS,/ Maps Get Google Maps on your phone t ('' Text the word °GMAPS° to 466453 Goos ���•••rrr '� m _ Jp 38th 3 Q m'_. o St cn ' St 39th � w 38th sil z: V_ 1: t:iikhda - l _ I mi I E nna i. ta Park h ".irecle Mile,- w 40th St to %'J40tn Si - -- wr- ...rr+ W dOth St Shopping Cerder- `I a I I I r .c l 00, n <I to 'N4�st St .._ Y441stSt o Yale Cardens D D A o Park/ I = Cn r%%I I� Odd A•• �: kem i -f ; .R7: _w 441 st st -7 .. , _— - — r'' —. - ®. 1 L . - a2, - — p AN 42nd df ' �' _ - -� Linden i L' �m ty m l i y lmis' ?ark' i L L 0 tN d2nd St I ° e - y:.. o I n e < VJ 43rd St ViavelE6 Park. ; i -Nl- -= - Moimn rde Rd - ttarningslJa Rd_, omings da Rd . —" - W.ot9t P ' W' e3 I �ryj �►5t'`- 1 D i IQ Sort v:. - r I bl to; j I I i m� I' l3ro4mda'e P 'ca - o, a''. - -m of ,� 9r�'�5 _ _:,• -' I I I i� j. t m FA ' 1 L: c •_'JM. h�St I m v I N' \+J'�•- Irl h — L. ACA.. I —' SM 44th St bs R4 ' 0I D d v ' Iu� a�P --_5u -)e AI I '� 4'J4 n. At _ W 47th S - Creeks. l3rid t __ DI �r - on! � I I `- _ lind0- mI g I .. ._ ..... - -- N to � I' m� Im I` —_VJ 48th St g - _ �f 48th 5t VJ 41M S! _ _ W! , 4 0r o 71 I Ip ._ ._... cry, a; _' s v Zn S`!• o al m I I{ � 9 I Pershing 7� Ftki A' '� :y�?eaa+ ;' �' .•r' ?�. a � c I_N 49th St � Ja 49th_ St � '.N 4' --ay��sn, ,off.. _ .. !y a a4 t:7 st N' aj C�2U08 1�: 4 Malady s 020d8 Tele Masi Sidewalk Petition Proponents 0 views - Unlisted Created on Oct 28 - Updated 2 days ago By pepinsailor Rate this map - Write a comment 4212 42nd St. Nulty /-'X 4304 42nd St `7 Kosters 1,++r.• /�,nare onnala nom /rrtanc /mc9hl =Pn iP= TiTFR &msa= 0&msid= 11303762413266878... 10/31/2008 A-U- t-lvm Cdl&4 12 ef 14L� 'A /� C- 'CV CVtv-S3LV:2 1k e 0, -93 � /A 1 1--/' j #6 aov'�ej November 10, 2008 Re: Proposed sidewalk from 44th to 481h Streets Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, 1 am writing to withdraw my name from the petition to install a sidewalk from 44th to 48th Streets along France Avenue. I am concerned about the negative impact such an installation would have on the White Oaks Neighborhood and city in general in terms of removing trees and increasing taxes. The City's resources would be better spent on a crosswalk on France Avenue to give pedestrians access to 44th and France and S& and France business areas, as well as the Minneapolis lakes and parks. The trees buffering France from the White Oaks homes provide shade, sound buffering and beauty and should be kept intact. They also provide a degree of privacy and safety to the homes along France Avenue, which have recently experienced break -ins. Please consider a crosswalk as an environmentally friendly, less impactful and more cost - effective alternative to the proposed sidewalk. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Molly Opp 4702 Townes Rd. t� 4+a(-6w" b- I France Ave Sidewalk Petition Results Residents Who Currently Reside at Address that Signed Petition Dated October 16, 2007 Requesting Sidewalk. Signed Yes, but No Longer Reside at Address Shown. Changed Vote from Yes to No Residents Who Currently Reside ate at Address that Signed Petition Dd November 12, 2008 Declining Sidewalk. i\ W+ E 4a/9r� W S 4850 1 4600 I 4901 4905 4907 4909 4913 4917 4091 1019 1 1012 1 2 4013 ,012 4013 4018 g 4017 wiu V ° 440017 4014 4016 !0'4 1011 ,019 /018 1020 Iozo 1016 4019 4019 1018 1019 ,022 4021 iy17 1020 1920 4021 4024 1023 ! 4023 4925 4025 1024 1075 .lo STw j 094101 4100 4101 +11 4021 Itas 4104 4103 4102 4109 4108 ,1 4 — 113 4112 4113 1116 4117 +118 4117 4120 41- 1 4121 4120 4121 4124 4 .nn IT w 100 4201 i 4I2y0 4201 C 420 4206 4211 4212 4211 4205 4209 4206 {206 421 4212 4215 4218 4212 4219 4212 1213 1210 4218 4219 4220 4216 1216 4220 1223 4224 4217 +220 4277 4216 4215 4212 4219 4224 4217 4217 4214 4224 4227 4219 4218 4219 4216 1221 .228 4221 4221 4220 4231 +232 +223 4228 1223 4222 4223 U11 61 4223 4230 4225 4224 4225 4222 4232 4227 4232 4227 4226 +227 4224 4231 1231 4229 1229 1226 4234 42X1 4231 4230 1230 4236 4233 4232 4231 4232 4237 4235 {237 42387 4234 4235 z e 42+0 4236 4240 423 4238 4239 4238 4242 1243 4212 4243 1242 4212 4241 4245 4245 4240 4242 1214 4412 12+8 {2 {7 k 4248 4247 g Engineering Dept. November, 2008 8 e e R w N ,.m s. 4424 0 4500 v 4520 + 4407 4311 1905 4�1Mg1W 4409 4105 1505 4501 � �N 4508 i 01 ! 1501 4401 45 4500 4501 6uINY641E 5S o po Q 4502 411 1301 4500 a 4509 4503 4503 4503 45M 4502 4405 0 4301 +50+ + 1506 451 1504 1505 4604 4 1302 + 4505 4507 4506 4507 4506 1507 4306 1 4100 4115 1201 4005 4003 C42 4203 4208 4205 4212 1207 4211 4214 4215 4219 1220 4221 4223 4225 4220 4222 1224 1228 4223 4228 4242 4250 4227 4229 4231 4300 4228 4231 4230 4233 4232 4233 4235 4237 4!W__ 4237 4920 4239 4238 K 4239 4321 4241 4243 4245 4240 4242 4244 0+ 0 4248 1241 4243 1328 4330 4247 4249 4248 4247 4350 4352 1500 4507 1 s+ 4501 451 4504 4508 < 4509 4510 1509 1508 4309 4508 +`�1 1503 4502 4307 4506 4509 4510 4511 +512 +514 V 1511 1513 4510 4512 4511 4513 4510 /512 4502 4511 +505 4`'a _ !M ! 4512 1513 4516 4515 4514 4515 4514 ! 4504 4595 4507 + 4513 4514 4515 4516 4517 1616 4517 4510 < ,�r05 451 4511 +510 1515 4516 4517 4520 151. 4318 4519 4518 ! 4308 4509 4507 ! 4513 +312 4517 4618 4510 4522 4321 4620 4621 4520 1 4511 4510 4Si0 4521 4524 4623 1622 1823 4522 +5M 4510 4512 4515 +51+ 4519 4b2Y -j5-M- 4526 4525 4521 4625 4524 4513 4511 4512 4514 4517 4516 4521 4524 4323 4525 4530 1527 1529 1526 4527 452. 4526 4525 4515 4513 4514 1519 4518 4523 4628 4527 4532 1531 IS30 4531 4530 +517 4510 ...QM 4516 IS/S A 4601 +� 1601 4800 1 4801 "OD 1601 4600 4801 +� 1500 1803 4802 4603 4002 4603 4802 4601 46DO 4601 +600 4803 1002 4603 45W 4805 4004 4605 4804 1808 4501 4003 4602 4503 4802 1604 4605 4800 4607 1505 4505 4097 4809 1506 4005 1601 480. 4505 4008 461 4505 4604 4803 +80'1 1805 +507 4111 +9D7 4008 4809 4810 4611 4610 4611 4610 4 +807 +808 4009 4610 4611 4612 4613 4812 4613 4612 460 4 600 4809 4506 1811 1612 4613 +614 4615 4614 4615 4614 480. 4608 4809 4508 +810 4x13 4514 +815 1816 1617 b1S 4877 4616 1519 1011 4610 4611 +811 4513 4812 4513 +818 4517 4310 4020 4619 4021 4018 1820 4619 4621 4615 4620 464646 4613 4612 4510 4812 4516 4011 4815 4514 4017 4618 1620 4619 4621 4522 4624 4623 4525 4622 4624 4623 4625 4615 4614 4617 4616 4519 1822 4823 +� +827 4826 4627 4612 17 1 4617 1 WY IS 4825 4029 d4e32 431. 4616 3' 4616 4620 4618 4310 4619 4624 Q �D !427 4890 45311 4833 46308 4432 ° 4531 4S33 1818 i 4621 24 45342 4535 4622 i 4624 1623 4626 4425 �i y 3q i 1530 4833 4838 4538 !437 4631 49r11 ao 4100 4820 1632 4627 410. s 1903 49D2 +113 4DD4 4630 4029' 1229 2214215 4fg7 4905 46]4 4904 1008 4 4906 +911 4910 4901 3 5 9 I4M 4905 ID11 1912 4514 1 4100 4115 1201 4005 4003 C42 4203 4208 4205 4212 1207 4211 4214 4215 4219 1220 4221 4223 4225 4220 4222 1224 1228 4223 4228 4242 4250 4227 4229 4231 4300 4228 4231 4230 4233 4232 4233 4235 4237 4!W__ 4237 4920 4239 4238 K 4239 4321 4241 4243 4245 4240 4242 4244 0+ 0 4248 1241 4243 1328 4330 4247 4249 4248 4247 4350 4352 4304 4301 gg c� ub88g 4380 4397 4311 S$ 3920 m' 4386 3935 c 4313 315 w 3019 3936 311 4916 �T u 39 6 a VAU-10-111A IN To: Mayor & City Council From: _ Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: November 3, 2008 Subject: Receive Feasibility Study and-for France Avenue Sidewalk Improvement No. S -101. Recommendation: A (,, U-1 Agenda Item # V. J. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Staff believes the project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt the attached Resolution No. 2008 -114, ordering a public hearing to be held on December 2, 2008 to hear the France Avenue Sidewalk Improvements, City Improvement No. S -101. Info /Background: This project was initiated by resident petition. The proposed project would involve constructing a boulevard style concrete sidewalk along the west side of the France Avenue from W. 48th Street to Sunnyside Road. The Feasibility Study is included with this report; along with all correspondence received to date. The estimated project cost is $250,000. Municipal State Aid funds would be used to fund the sidewalk improvement project. GAEngineering \Improvements \S101 West side of France, 48th to Sunnyside\Prelim Design\20081029_RRpublic hearing - S101.doc �9111A, j �1 o� e 7, h �r l rtaeP Aiim, ko,-t e..,J r- I city of Edina November 5, 2008 France Avenue Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 1 Informational Meeting Announcement France Avenue Sidewalk Project from 48' Street to Sunnyside Road City of Edina, Improvement No. S -101 Dear Resident: The City Council has ordered a public hearing regarding the above referenced project at the December 2, 2008, City Council meeting as a result of a petition received from residents. Prior to the public hearing, staff will host an informational meeting on Wednesday, November 19, from 7:00 to 8:00 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers located at 4801 W. 50th Street (the .Council Chambers is immediately to your left as you enter City Hall). A feasibility report for the proposed project has been completed and is available for review on the City of Edina's web site, http: / /www.ci.edina.mn.us /Departments /L4- 17a Construction Proiects. htm. If you are unable to attend the meeting, information regarding this project will be available after this, meeting at City Hall and. on our "Construction Projects" website. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer Enclosed: Project Area Map G• \Engineering \Improvements \S101 West side of France 48th to Sunnyside \Prelim Design\20081105 Resident Letter No 1.doc City all 952- 927 -8861 y FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofeclina.coni TTY 952 -836 -0379 November 12, 2008 France Avenue Residents Edina, Minnesota Ai6 ('�) k0', (4 mt RE: Resident Letter No. 2 Informational Meeting Announcement France Avenue Sidewalk Project from 48"' Street to Sunnyside Road City of Edina, Improvement No. S -101 Dear Resident: City of Edina Please note the new meeting place for the November 19, 7:00 -8:00 p.m. informational meeting: Senior Center Sherwood Room 5280 Grandview Square The Senior Center is located below the Hennepin County Library off Vernon Avenue just west of Interlachen Blvd. The entrance and parking is on the south side of the library. If you enter through the library door you will need to go downstairs to the Sherwood Room. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 FRANCE AVENUE SIDEWALK OPEN HOUSE NOVEMBER 19, 2008 ,4 --lac, h� A - l NAME ADDRESS ' q ' f"' V, E`er t Vt 3 `f (� I le 4 I,/, - r v s Mire-e C.46sew,( 4 _7a / 1V61(f 0 0 tl-) lqjej',d 7 ✓z. a 4171 ea - � - 2c�. 8 l�1V 464 {U�l�l�� -46 10 lo 11 LN DA L.�o L,47 �Li �-� vS iD - S 12 \1, 13 15 ecca CiSS U - ! �j v� O J r 16 ;d i,ke, ��,, art (r�:�/ �� (G- L.;?rt 2 :1�, I �! f �) �� /` �i�c < �. / i '✓� 7 �i 17 .. C Y-003 A�-PL 44.e_ 18 ' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 J STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) A-44-u c,� ew,--A :E. I CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date, November 14, 2008, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Sidewalk Improvements on France Avenue from W. 48th Street to Sunnyside Road (west side) (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 17 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS / WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of 20 Je A.- w9��r'U e P, o November 14, 2008 AiFauh..w6 s -a City of Edina NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. S -101 FRANCE AVENUE FROM 48 STREET WEST TO SUNNYSIDE ROAD EST SIDE The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, December 2, 2008, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on neighborhood sidewalk improvements for the west side of France Avenue from 48'h Street West to Sunnyside Road. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2009. The estimated project cost is $250,000.00. The cost of the project will be funded by Municipal State Aid funds and therefore, you will not be assessed for this sidewalk. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 AHMV-OD-008 -L wo3p*Aj8Ae•MMM � F 0702824440135 D W LUGAR C/O CENTRY 21 LUGER RLTY 4536 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 0702824440140 MICHAEL BODINE KATIE MARSH - BODINE 4540 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 0702824440147 JUDITH LUGER JAMES LUGER 12505 BRIARWOOD TERR MINNETONKA MN 55343 1802824110005 SHERYLPEARSON GARY PEARSON 4638 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 1802824110008 VLADAS GRISKEVICIUS JENNIFER GRISKEVICIUS 4650 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 1802824110036 MOLLY RICE ANDREW SLOTHOWER 4705 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824110063 KATHRYN A SCHMID CONNOR SCHMID 4711 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824110066 LORA OPSAHL DAVID G OPSAHL 4717 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824110079 MICHAEL A OLSON HELEN R BODDY 4626 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 1802824110082 PATRICIA M STARK 4612 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 u„ dn-dod progaj al jal@Aipi ivawabJeW 09L5 V3AV iljege6 al zeslllifl a ul a amn e e zal da ap sues ® C P 4� 4 I@ I Zi v ., I calls sabl3� . 0702824440137 0702824440138 ASHLAND OIL INC NOONAN PROPERTIES LLC 3499 DABNEY DRIVE 5400 FRANCE AVE S LEXINGTON KY 40509 EDINA MN 55410 0702824440141 0702824440142 JEREMIGH MOSTROM MARY JO AIKEN ADAM SCHWEBACH FRANK L AIKEN JR 4544 FRANCE AVE S 4548 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 EDINA MN 55410 1802824110003 1802824110004 JEFFREY E MATTILA SIDNEY G SHOWERS 2825 OVERLOOK CIR 4634 FRANCE AVE S BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 EDINA MN 55410 1802824110006 1802824110007 HEATHER LISAACS MICHELE M GERMANSON DUANE A ISAACS 4646 FRANCE AVE S 4640 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 EDINA MN 55410 EDINA MN 55424 1802824110034 1802824110035 KARIN L WILLE ROBIN R HARMON 4701 MEADOW RD KEITH HARMON EDINA MN 55424 4703 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824110061 1802824110062 PERRY WEDUM MICHAEL) MARTIN CHRISTINE WEDUM GWEN MARTIN 4707 MEADOW RD 4709 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824110064 1802824110065 ROBIN SAVAGEAU SUSAN A WAHMAN DAVE SAVAGEAU GARY S WAHMAN 4713 MEADOW RD' 4715 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824110077 1802824110078 TYRONE L ROSSOM CONRAD RAZIDLO 4620 FRANCE AVE S 4622 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 EDINA MN 55410 1802824110080. 1802824110081 LESLIE F BARKE JACK L OVICK 3009 LINKVIEW OR 4941 FRANCE AVE S LAS VEGAS NV 89134 EDINA MN 55410 1802824110083 1802824110084 CONNIE TEEL RICHARD A BROZIC 4610 FRANCE AVE S CAROL L BROZIC EDINA MN 55410 4608 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 wi0965 ®A+��� r W1a6P3 dn-dod asodxa �® jaded Paai r ©09LS aleldLual QAJaAV ash o1 aull 6uole buan MAW l!jege6 a! zas! ; 1 juawa6jey3 ap sues ,096S ®Aalg AMAV- 0"09-L u0R3n 'U1.p wor/jq�C -MA&M alllne; el za;lnsuo: - �° sa,pe} sauanb!4 —T s. . 1802824110085 1802824110086 FRED R KRAFT / 1802824110087. ER JOHN E SPEIER DONNA C KRAFT 4602 FRANCE AVE S _ 1ENNINE L SPEIER 4604 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 '06 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 INA MN 55410 1802824110089 1802824110090 1802824110088 EDINA MILLS HOME OWNER ASS J.B.C',DEVELOPMENT INC. SHEILA L K0088 SHEILA Sol SOUTHGATE OFFICE BLDG 801 SOUTHGATE OFFICE BLDG FRANCE S 4600 CE AVE AV BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 EDINA MN City of Edina November 25, 2008 France Avenue Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 3 Rescheduled Public Hearing, January 6, 2009 France Avenue Sidewalk Project from 48n Street to Sunnyside Road City of Edina, Improvement No. S -101 Dear Resident: The public hearing that was scheduled for December 2, 2008, at 7:00 p.m., has been rescheduled for January 6, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. You will receive another public hearing notice at least 10 days before the rescheduled date of January 6. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 PID: 0702824440138 4528 FRANCE PID: 0702824440137 4530 FRANCE PID: 0702824440147 4536 FRANCE AVE S PID: 0702824440135 4536 FRANCE AVE S PID: 0702824440140 4540 FRANCE AVE S PID: 0702824440141 4544 FRANCE AVE S PID: 0702824440142 4548 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110077 4620 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110080 4624 FRANCE PID: 1802824110003 4630 FRANCE PID: 1802824110004 4634 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110005 4638 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110006 4640 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110007 4646 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110008 4650 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110034 4701 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110035 4703 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110036 4705 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110061 4707 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110062 4709 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110063 4711 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110064 4713 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110065 4715 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824110066 4717 MEADOW RD PID: 1802824140004 4800 FRANCE AVE S PID: 1802824110081 4941 FRANCE AVE S PID:1802824110089 501 SOUTHGATE OFFICE BLDG PID: 1802824110090 801 SOUTHGATE OFFICE BLDG C) f CONDOS NO ADDRESS �9ZrlA, �1 0 e aoa December 19, 2008 France Avenue Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 4 Rescheduled Public Hearing, February 3, 2009 France Avenue Sidewalk Project from 48 Street to Sunnyside Road City of Edina, Improvement No. S -101 Dear Resident: City of Edina The public hearing that was scheduled for January 6, 2009, at 7:00 p.m., has been rescheduled for February 3, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. The official public hearing notice is enclosed. Sincerely, u' Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 *4acA,.mew4 L- I A O� e leJ rte' � a City of Edina December 19, 2008 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RESCHEDULED SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. S -101 FRANCE AVENUE FROM 48 In STREET WEST TO SUNNYSIDE ROAD (WEST SIDE) The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, February 3, 2009, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on neighborhood sidewalk improvements for the west side of France Avenue from 48th Street West to Sunnyside Road. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2009. The estimated project cost is $250,000.00. The cost of the project will be funded by Municipal State Aid funds and therefore, you will not be assessed for this sidewalk. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 4 114 CA 0.4944 s ��-ec� l �( k tvr,4- 5LI ujvpp J .j DEC 3 7sn ''. . ' - r'�t�rc h �olr � id r (.t/` (� C% �l 'T �7,r �•v�'� �iLf�' �' T P� -r pe,4 t 4r A -� S r j �r t�� t� -r c t a i / ��'� •fir Y '4 ��'� y�,�� �� �, r,� �l �; � •' ci-I -FLi r 1 S. -T lie '. (K W ,y ,cL /J, 6-e C k �j ,� Gvcy►— '� �' '� i —,r % l! ue 5. rT f,r1T C� %l/ti`l �� h �/ti:, %j/� �(h ��c- •6�5.� {�c Ir 'v •'���`� 'mac.. �ti f(� �� r From: Perry Wedum [pwedum @gmail.com] AiAq(. AKe4,,.k M -A Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:45 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Chris A Wedum eject: France Ave Sidewalk - 4700 block ..yne, As a resident that would be impacted by the addition of a sidewalk along the 4700 block of France Ave I was encouraged to email thoughts, concerns and questions. I know several other neighbors have contacted you as well and we all appreciate your timely feedback and responses. Initially, I took a "wait and see" approach regarding questions as I did not feel that sidewalk would be approved based on the small number of residents that would benefit and the fact that there are alternate routes for these residents that would realistic add no more than 1 -2 blocks to their walk. It has also been brought to our attention that numerous signatures on the petition are from residents that live several blocks to the west of France Ave - as far as Wooddale. Obviously, these residents are not likely to use that sidewalk as they have several other routes that take them down much quieter streets to get to the 50th and France area. Questions regarding the approval of the sidewalk: Realistically, how many residents would utilize the side walk? Of those that would use the sidewalk, what alternative routes do they currently have and how much longer would their walks be? (I've crossed France numerous times to know that it is very possible and not nearly as dangerous as some might claim). Again, from a costibenefit standpoint, I have a hard time understanding the rational behind the cost. If indeed the sidewalk is approved - what is the cost to the city for installing the sidewalk? My wife and I are in agreement that if the sidewalk goes in, we would like to move forward with the fence. I do feel privacy fences and walls along France give the street a very industrial feel and in general am not a huge fan, but .n a security standpoint, if a sidewalk were to be put in I would want that protection. Would a 10' fence be approved along France? I understand that if the utilities are buried during the process that would be at the cost of the homeowners. If they are not buried, would the utility poles need to be relocated? If so, where would they go and at whose expense? Will the fence abut the sidewalk, or would it need to be set back a certain distance from the sidewalk? If trees need to be removed for the fence, I'm assuming that will be at the expense of the homeowner? Also, who will bear the expense of tree removal for the installation of the sidewalk? In the winter, who will be responsible for snow removal? Will maintenance of the fence (graffiti removal) be the home owner's responsibilities? With the installation of the sidewalk/fence, will that impact current ordinances regarding setbacks for future remodeling/additions? Thanks Wayne - we do appreciate your assistance. Perry Wedum 4707 Meadow Rd 1.877.0323 From: Perry Wedum [pwedum @gmail.com] L jV�,•.?J Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 9:45 AM To: Wayne Houle Subject: Re: France Ave Sidewalk - 4700 block Wayne, The residents on Meadow (4700 block) will be meeting tonight. Have you had the chance to look at my questions below. If so, would you be able to provide any answers to my questions prior to tonight? I know that some of my questions have been asked by others and you have provided answers. Thanks Wayne - I appreciate your feedback. Perry Wedum On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Perry Wedum <pwedum @gmail.com> wrote: Wayne, As a resident that would be impacted by the addition of a sidewalk along the 4700 block of France Ave I was encouraged to email thoughts, concerns and questions. I know several other neighbors have contacted you as well and we all appreciate your timely feedback and responses. Initially, I took a "wait and see" approach regarding questions as I did not feel that sidewalk would be approved based on the small number of residents that would benefit and the fact that there are alternate routes for these residents that would realistic add no more than 1 -2 blocks to their walk. It has also been brought to our attention that numerous signatures on the petition are from residents that live several blocks to the west of France Ave - as far as Wooddale. Obviously, these residents are not likely to use that sidewalk as they have several other routes that take them down much quieter streets to get to the 50th and France area. Questions regarding the approval of the sidewalk: Realistically, how many residents would utilize the side walk? Of those that would use the sidewalk, what alternative routes do they currently have and how much longer would their walks be? (I've crossed France numerous times to know that it is very possible and not nearly as dangerous as some might claim). Again, from a cost/ber standpoint, I have a hard time understanding the rational behind the cost. If indeed the sidewalk is approved - what is the cost to the city for installing the sidewalk? My wife and I are in agreement that if the sidewalk goes in, we would like to move forward with the fence. I do feel that privacy fences and walls along France give the street a very industrial feel and in general am not a huge fan, but from a security standpoint, if a sidewalk were to be put in I would want that protection. Would a 10' fence be approved along France? I understand that if the utilities are buried during the process that would be at the cost of the homeowners. If they are not buried, would the utility poles need to be relocated? If so, where would they go and at whose expense? Will the fence abut the sidewalk, or would it need to be set back a certain distance from the sidewalk? If trees need to be removed for the fence, I'm assuming that will be at the expense of the homeowner? Also, who will bear the expense of tree removal for the installation of the sidewalk? In the winter, who will be responsible for snow removal? Will maintenance of the fence (graffiti removal) be the home owner's responsibilities? With the installation of the sidewalk/fence, will that impact current ordinances regarding setbacks for future remodeling/additions? Thanks Wayne - we do appreciate your assistance. Perry Wedum 4707 Meadow Rd e 033 From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:06 AM To: Wayne Houle Subject: FW: Sidewallk feedback From: Jilene Framke [mailto:angeltoesinc @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 6:38 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Sidewallk feedback I would love a sidewalk on the west side of France from Sunnyside to 48th! Much safer than crossing the street to walk to 50th and France. www.prayingmantisbook.com Jilene Framke 4105 Morningside Road Minneapolis MN 55416 PH 952 - 920 -3604 FX 952- 848 -7777 J M -q #rfq C" M -5 Jeremiah Mostrom 4544 France Ave South Edina, MN 55410 November 18, 2008 To: Mayor Jim Hovland CC: City Council Members: Ann Swenson, Scott Housch, Linda Masica, Joni Bennett Engineering Dept: Wayne Houle, Jack Sullivan 4801 West 50`' Street Edina, MN 55424 I am a current resident of Edina. I am writing to ask for your support in favor of the France Ave Sidewalk Improvement No: S 101. I firmly believe that this section of France Ave from Sunnyside Road to 48�h Street is in desperate need of a sidewalk. Not having this sidewalk is a very severe safety concern for me, many of my neighbors and my family. I believe there is a huge benefit to the safety and wellbeing of our city by adding this side walk. Consider: The speed of traffic flow on this section of France has become offensively fast and the amount of traffic continues to increase- creating a very dangerous atmosphere. Furthermore, children, elderly, disabled, and those without transportation can hardly leave their homes without facing the dangers of this busy road. It would seem that in addition to increased safety, adding this sidewalk would bring business growth, better property values, increased wellbeing though the ability safely go for a walk and the elimination of greenhouse emissions through better access to public transportation. It has been brought to my attention that there is a petition from people in the White Oaks neighborhood asking a cross walk instead of sidewalk. Their basis for opposition: Lost trees and assessments. From the information that has been provided to me, these do not hold credence. Are these tradeoffs that we really want to make? I am looking forward to your response on this matter. Please support my family and my neighbors in making our lives as Edina residents safe and well. Sincerely, Jeremiah Mostrom From: Lynette Biunno A46cAvte4,k M—(.e Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:09 PM To: Wayne Houle; Jack Sullivan Cc: Susan Heiberg ject: FW: France Ave Sidewalk Project from 48th Street to Sunnyside Road Importance: High Attachments: Letter to Mayor.doc From: Jeremiah Mostrom [mailto:jeremiah @simplyorganicbeauty.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:56 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: France Ave Sidewalk Project from 48th Street to Sunnyside Road Importance: High Hello, Can you please forward the attached letter to Mayor Jim Hovland, Ann Swenson, Scott Housch, Linda Masica, Joni Bennett, Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan? I have also delivered a hard copy to ensure it has reached them. Thanks in advance for you help. Cheers, ❑x hnp:// www. simplyorganicbeauty. net/corpemailsignatur es/ejer_m.jpg No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1785 - Release Date: 11/13/2008 9:12 AM From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:09 PM To: ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; Scot Housh Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: FW: Proposed Sidewalk on France Avenue Open House & Public Hearing From: Joni Bennett [ mailto :jonibennettl2 @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:07 PM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: Fwd: Proposed Sidewalk on France Avenue Open House & Public Hearing Gordon, Please forward this to City Council members and the Engineering Department. It is the notice I referred to during Council Comments last night that was sent by the MNA to its a -list. Thank you. Joni Bennett ionibennettl2@comcast.net 952- 927 -0661 Begin forwarded message: From: "Information From The Momingside Neighborhood Association" <edina.momingside(a)gmail.com> Date: November 17, 2008 6:29:18 PM CST Subject: Proposed Sidewalk on France Avenue Open House & Public Hearing Residents circulated a petition at the 2007 MNA Annual Meeting and Woman's Club requesting a sidewalk on the west side of France Avenue, between Sunnyside Road and 48th Street. City staff have completed a feasibility study of the proposed sidewalk and concluded: "Staff believes construction of this project is necessary, cost effective and feasible to create a safe pedestrian link along France Avenue. The project will connect a missing segment of sidewalk along France'Avenue which leads to two business areas." The sidewalk project, estimated to cost $250,000, would be funded through a distribution of the state gas tax; there would be no direct costs to residents. The City has scheduled an informational meeting on the proposed sidewalk for this Wednesday, November 19, 7:00 -8:00 p.m. in the Sherwood Room of the Edina Senior Center (located below the Edina Library.). Residents interested in learning more about the project are encouraged to attend. A public hearing on the project is scheduled for the December 2, 2008 City Council meeting (7:00 p.m., Council Chambers, City Hall). Residents can attend the meeting to comment on the proposed sidewalk. Residents can also email comments to the Council at edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us. For more information,.contact the City's engineering department: 952- 826 -0371. The MNA was formed in 2003 to promote a better community through group action and involvement in decisions made by local government, and to represent the interests of all residents and property- owners in the Morningside neighborhood. The MNA is a 501(c)4 nonprofit. Gordon Hughes lom: Joni Bennett gonibennettl2 @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:29 PM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: Requests for information about France Avenue Sidewalk Gordon, I have the following questions about France Avenue sidewalk proposal: 1. What is the traffic volume on the portion of France Avenue adjacent to the proposed sidewalk? The,1999 Comprehensive Plan states a volume measured in 1997. I looked'at the current draft plan and,Northeast Edina Transportation. - ;Study, but did not "find a number for this'segment of France,Avenue in either. 2. Will any bus stop locations be changed in connection with or.as a result of the proposed project? 3. What level and type of street lighting currently exists along this segment of France Avenue, and will any change in the level or type of lighting be made as part of the proposed project? 4. Who will maintain the proposed sidewalk - e.g., snow removal? 5. Will any fence(s) need to be moved /removed to construct the proposed sidewalk? If so, at what addresses? Who will pay for the.moving /removing /replacement of each such fence? 6. Who.installed the metal guard rail and retaining wall depicted in Photo 7 in the Staff Report dated November 3, 2008? Who will pay for their removal and replacement.with "an - ipdated retaining wall system "? (See page 5 of the Staff Report.) Will that updated system include a barrier similar in purpose. -to the metal guard rail? 7. What is the distance between the France Avenue roadway and the houses in the 4700 block of France .Avenue? 8. What is Staff's position on'a crosswalk on France_ Avenue at West.47th-Street or West 48th Street? What jurisdiction has control over the question? What are the considerations regarding traffic speed and volume? Thank you - Joni Bennett jon.ibennettl2 @comcast.net 952- 92.7 -0661 , 1 A- iiu�..�" 'M -Q 20081121 SH RE France Avenue sidewalk Hearing.txt From: Housh, Scot [scot.housh @willis.com] sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 12:19 PM To: Gordon Hu hes; ann swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica Cc: Wayne Houle; Jack Sullivan subject: RE: France Avenue sidewalk Hearing January is fine with me. Scot Housh Executive vice President Risk Management Practice Leader Willis HRH 1600 Utica Avenue south, suite 600 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Phone: 763.302.7174 Email: scot.housh @willis.com - -- original Message---- - From: Gordon Hughes [mailto:GHughes @ci.edina.mn.us] sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 11:44 AM To: ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; Housh, Scot Cc: Wayne Houle; Jack Sullivan subject: France Avenue sidewalk Hearing The Engineering Department hosted an open house Wednesday night for residents adjoining this proposed sidewalk. Based on the viewpoints of those attending coupled with the "anti" petition received last week, we should expect a spirited hearing which is scheduled for December 2, the same night as the compp plan hearing which I suspect will be well- attended. The December 16 meeting will be full if the Aloft and 7500 York move off of Planning Commission plus the Edina Realty project. After discussing this with the mayor this morning, we thought we should solicit your opinions on whether or not we should consider rescheduling the December 2 sidewalk hearing. Given the December 16 agenda, this probably means rescheduling the sidewalk for a meeting in January or February. I'm particularly sensitive to the fact that we're in a transition phase with respect to the composition of the council. The staff is prepared to hear this on December 2nd as scheduled or on December 16. My concern only deals with agenda planning which you've asked me to do to avoid inordinately long meetings. Please share your thoughts with me as soon as possible in that we'd like to provide as much notice as possible if you elect to reschedule. Thanks. Gordon L. Hughes City Manager City of Edina 952 - 826 -0401 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 WWW.CityOfEdina.com For information pertaining to Willis' email confidentiality and monitoring policy, usage restrictions, or for specific company registration and regulatory status information, please visit http:// www .willis.com /email_trailer.aspx Page 1 �t�aaloe,..4 M- 10 20081124 MN FW Re sidewalk on France.txt From. Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:30 AM To: Wayne Houle; Jack Sullivan cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Re sidewalk - -- original Message---- - From: Ma9 Nulty [ mailto :mkndogwalker @comcast.net] sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:14 PM To: Lynette Biunno subject: Re sidewalk To City Council, City Staff; we would like to weigh in on the matter of building a sidewalk on France Ave between Sunnyside and 48th Street. France is an extremely busy street and it is very hard to cross ay any time of day so a sidewalk would be very helpful to those of us who walk around the neighborhood when possible to do our errands. we are Morningside residents of 18 years and can't imagine why parts of France Ave have existed this long without a sidewalk. If we are to keep moving into the 21st century we need to do what is possible to encourage foot traffic and discourage car use whenever practical. we support wholeheartedly this very basic step. Mab Nulty and Larry Sutin Page 1 To: peggyfrank @att.net Cc: Jack Sullivan; Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: France Avenue Sidewalks - 47th to 48th Mr. Johnson: A Nt -I I Thank you for your email; it will be forwarded onto the City Council with the Feasibility Report. The Public Hearing for this p, is also being continued until the January 6 City Council Meeting. Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Direct 952 - 826 -0443 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 whoule - ci.edina.mn.us www.cityofedina.com From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 2:34 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: France Avenue Sidewalks - 47th to 48th From: Peggy & Frank [mailto:peggyfrank @att.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 2:32 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: France Avenue Sidewalks - 47th to 48th Please distribute this email to the appropriate council members and city staff..... thanks. Since I will be unable to attend the December 2 city council meeting, following are my 3 minutes of thoughts: CONNECTIVITY: the EXISTING ALTERNATIVES of Grimes Ave & Arden Ave and the east side of France Ave are BETTER for the Morningside residents who want to walk from their homes to 50th and France than the petitioned sidewalk down the west side of France. As a sometimes walker down the east side of France Ave, there is a parking lane to protect walkers from the splashing of rain, snow, slush, sand, salt, dust, and dirt that will not be available to anyone foolish enough to walk on the petitioned sidewalk on the west side. With approximately 7,500 cars, buses, and trucks traveling 30 -35 mph only several feet from the petitioned sidewalk, this clearly is not the best, or safest, side of France Ave to walk on. With existing crosswalks and stop lights at 44th, Sunnyside, 49th, 50th, and 51 st and France, there is no reason to walk on the petitioned west side sidewalk. Walking down Grimes Ave & Arden Ave is much nicer, safer, and stress free than anything France Ave has to offer. MAINTENANCE: At the present time, the street snowplows push the snow, sand, salt, chemicals, etc from France Ave on to the strip of ground where the petitioned sidewalk will be built. If the petitioned sidewalk is built, the city of Edina will have the options of 1) using the sidewalk snowplows to push it all back on to France Ave, 2) blowing the snow, sand, salt, chemicals, etc over the barrier fence on to the backyards of the residents living on Meadow Rd, or 3) bringing trucks in to haul it off. I don't think any of these options are acceptable. SECURITY: With the large number of attempted break -ins and burglaries in our neighborhood during the past few months, neighbors are understandably worried about this petitioned sidewalk providing quicker and easier access to the homes on Meadow Rd. We do not need to bring any more attention to our neighborhood as an easy place to make successful robberir COST: The estimated cost of $250,000 to the city of Edina, plus whatever cost for the utilities to re- locate 8 utility poles, seems like money poorly spent, particularly in these uncertain economic times, for a project where EXISTING ALTERNATIVES have ZERO COST. There must be city projects that have a higher priority for this $250,000. The petitioned sidewalk almost has a make work/create jobs feel to it. Let's leave those type of projects to the Federal government for more worthwhile projects. PETITION: Over 80+ neighbors in the IMMEDIATE neighborhood of the petitioned sidewalk signed a petition asking the city of Edina to please not proceed with this sidewalk. CONCLUSION: This petitioned sidewalk is NOT NEEDED, DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN, WASTE OF TAXPAYERS MONEY. Thanks for reading. Frank Johnson 4701 White Oaks Rd Edina, MN 55424 (952) 920 -2891 peggvfrankO)att.net �ctin�r1 -1 AH^�li+W.,t M -la December 30, 2008 Ms. Debra Mangen City Clerk City of Edina 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Clerk Mangen: As residents of Edina who live on France Avenue South, we strongly support the proposed extension of the sidewalk on the west side of France Avenue from W 48th Street to Sunnyside Road. There are many residents in our area near Sunnyside Road who walk to the shopping area near 50th and France. Crossing to the east side and navigating the often poorly- maintained sidewalk on the Minneapolis side is both dangerous and inconvenient, especially in winter. We urge the Edina City Council to extend the walk on this heavily traversed throughway as proposed for action at the January 6 meeting. Encouraging walking and enhancing the residential character of the area is a most worthy endeavor and one of the distinctions of Edina (recently listed among America's most - walkable cities). Thank you for your kind attention to this request. Si cerely, Richa Cook and Terry L hti „ 4560 ance Avenue S. Edina, MN 55410 C �' S A LL- TOPOGRAPHY At 4711, the center of the block, we are closest to the street and have the steepest incline below France Ave. WATER SHUT OFF Our 69 year old Mpls water line /shutoff valve is in the ditch or ravine just outside our fence and barely locatable at this time. If it should damaged or interfered with, we have been told our house would be "flooded off the foundation ". 65' FENCE Existing adequate and expensive cedar fence to 6 feet tall at the street level and a required 4 foot skirting fence below it to prevent street trash etc. from rolling in. Industrial size fence posts (8" x 8" x 16' creosoted bridge timber installed by Tele- Electric drill rig) and a 65' cut lannin stone wall support the fence against most snow plow damage. We should not have to pay an exorbitant price or assessment to replace for the convenience (not safety) of Morningside walkers (realistically how many ?) and 50th Street merchants. There are stop lights to cross France Ave at 44th, Sunnyside, 49'/2 and 50th Streets and plowable side walks in front of homes on the East side. SNOW DAMAGE France Ave snow plowing creates mounds of frozen ice and dirt that would make a sidewalk impassable in the winter. Sidewalk plowing by Edina would leave nowhere for snow and ice disposal with the exception of the ditch behind our fence which already suffers from snow and ice thrown by high speed street plows. GUARD RAIL Sidewalk would be further impeded by an existing and expensive guard rail protecting 4711 and parts of 4709 and 4713 which was installed many years ago after a car plunged into a bedroom window at 4711. The existing situation has served to provide privacy, reasonably block noise, prevent vandal- ism, trespassing and theft between 47th and 48th though not entirely, as police reports show recent attempts at break -ins. A street level sidewalk would exacerbate all of these considerations. We request the City Council reconsider this proposal and leave us "as is" or make us whole without penalty.. K. Schmid (952) 922 -4711 11 -19 -08 �a tiO�� � � � ev���� �j- w �v v5 e /� ao -off 7,� � ,�•���� � �.,� 1 :N!77 ��� Photos By Carolyn Corbett y: Carolyn Corbett 14,c —r - Iy �i-� z �aT� y include fencing in new home plans? Fencing �Yhy fence? 5� OW ��tY ° 4 tR' `1 � `� FAG 'c 7 — :an provide privacy, ce the aesthetic • Provide security. ppeal of your propconoung 7 Provide privacy. �ildren and pets. Many new homgns use fencing to . /° Id a finishing touch: perimeter fencing, decorative fencing, V ° Keep children and pets from wandering away. �• god neighbor fencing and more. Keep other animals out. Fencing should complement the architecture of your • Enclose pools. Mme, fit well with the landscape and serve the specific ��• Protect gardens. urposes you have in mind. Different fence styles blend different landscapes. n� 50 6 5M"- -W L- ° Block not i !tter with different home designs and V . fence that fits well in a suburban setting might look out of j/° Demarcate property lines. lace at a country home. Some owners seek privacy while feel Fences have F't VF.nhance ap eara�ce /AC-l _t,5 :hers refer an open with a good view. P P g 7"tip C . a , 4f�h�eh dh �c2� long life span, so it's important to choose one you find Decisions !sthetically pleasing and functional. Just as with your new home, there are important decisions to make concerning fencing: �, = - �/• Function of fence. of fence. /Type aterial: ;-�Ccost. Security requirements. _ - . ,�;- -.- ..- . �' • Maintenance requirements. Aesthetics. Timing Many d fenc boil ' un ' home on ction ✓ compl . Future p fo a yard be c d d. Pool,- lion, d constructi dscap' d d - �c,�G� !��, G n s� October 2008 :..���,,�' • ����..,: ' ; / lition of a hot tub, sauna or garden may all impact both ing and fencing needs. Consequently, it may be best to it until the construction is complete and specific plans outdoor areas have been laid. If the fence is built in conjunction with your new home, portant to allow sufficient room for construction ulment to access your property. One solution is to delay venting several posts into place so they can be easily noved if/when necessary. Ining; When choosing a fencing system, it is important to °ck local zoning regulations and know where property es and underground utilities are. Height, fencing material and direction the fence faces y be covered by local regulations. Many municipalities luire a security fence of a minimum height with self - ,sing, self - locking gates be installed immediately when a of is involved. Wood panel fencing is often chosen by people looking safeguard their families and property, to prevent -spassing or theft, and to keep animals out of the yard. tese fences need to extend all the way to the ground and high enough to deter both animals and vandals. Panels available with pointed or dog -eared pickets and can be Lined or painted to blend with your new home or the rrounding landscape. Solid fencing also dampens street 4se and provides containment so that young children and :ts do not wander away. r M!cy Another reason for solid fencing is privacy. If you prefer snooze in your hammock, swim in your pool or soak in ur hot. tub without an audience, a privacy fence is for Privacy fences not only protect you from prying eyes, .n be used to block the view of something unsightly. Fencing materials After determining the style of fence, the next decision is choosing the fencing material. The options are many: stone, brick, cement block, steel, aluminum, ornamental iron, even bamboo. Each material has strengths and drawbacks. All fences require a certain amount of maintenance over the years, some more than others. Wood Wood is relatively inexpensive, available in a variety of durable species, easy to work with and all natural. Along with the solid panels, one popular type of wooden fencing is split rail. Split rail fences have a rustic, natural look and are perfect for perimeter fencing to mark property lines and .__. offer visual appeal. Drawbacks r Wood requires yearly maintenance, boards can warp and it is susceptible to both wood rot and termites. Even pressure treated wood degrades over time. Wood fences may turn gray if not sealed properly and may dent or split if hit by a lawnmower. In addition, non - rusting fasteners must be used to prevent staining. Wrought iron Wrought iron has been used for years; some centuries old wrought iron fences still stand today. Iron is durable, doesn't dent or scratch easily and comes in numerous. styles; Wrought iron provides an elegant and durable fence where style is a primary concern. It defuses property lines clearly while allowing views of the landscape and architecture. Used in combination with stone posts, wrought iron creates a virtually permanent fence that requires minimal maintenance. Drawbacks Wrought iron is heavy and will eventually rust and flake if not well maintained. October 2008 X71/ A) 4( q t17 CT Pfd i' � -/-�E= �� ��1., G �.(.S � /� -�. S 77- 116471-t5 rl�il- /'Al (--7/1 77Ft f5A 67 4C 7-7 e- gig =M� Cl Fil Co I M-1 7-A& IT 7 23! .. ti 4-7 fl e../&d o cJ Tv t h In� S J t� T 4,W •�yyqq.((� t.L,te�G� 1"�iL e S l�Pjs water PC r�iL �wluLGVaI+�� uuaa� %/lllllV Al%.,A b _ aLLWA — a e LL1VV. araua. _ —O� — (At-�A q Yahoo! My Yahoo! Ul d ir1•:n Welcome, ers_email Sign Uul nu -1'ICry I•lail Hulp Search: Mimi! I Contacts Calendar Notepad What's New? Mobile Mail Options Check MaB Compose 5eorch Moll Search the Web Previous I Next I Back to Messages Mark as Unread I Pdnr Folders [Add - Edit] Inbox (18) Drafts (24) Sent Spam (1) [Empty] Trash [Empty] My Folders [Hide] 50th law schoo... brian burger csjohnnyoconno... godfrey house honeywell Joe Chu laney, lyndon ... miscellaneous nostpl48 platers homeco... siewert Milo Search Shortcuts My Photos My Attachments Check Mail I Compose Dcfete Reply Forward Spam Move— v' _. To protect your privacy, Yahool Mail has blocked remote images in this message. show Images - options [whiteoaksedinal Crime Alert Thursday, August 14, 2008 6:30 PM From: -While Oaks Improvement Assoc." <lschuet@hotmaitcom> To: whitcoaksedinapyahoogrouPs.mm Please review this story from the Star Tnbuoe While Edhta residents slumber, home burglars become active PAUL WALSH, Star Tribune Edina is reporting a rasb of late -nigbt break -ins into occupied homes on the east side of town while its residents ate sleeping. So far, no physical halm bas come to the victims, police said today. In the past sue weeks, them have been 12 residential break -ins, all east of the Hwy - loo. said police spokeswoman Molly Anderson. Anderson added that the city's neighbors — Hopkins, St Louis Park and southwest Minneapolis — are experiencing a similar crime outbreak. The perpetrators in Edina are entering overnight through ground -level windows, most often by cutting the screens, Anderson said. A common lure for the criminals — cash being lit out Police in Fdina are encouraging their eidzens to lock their windows and doors, improve exterior fighting and report suspicious activity. "I can't emphasize strongly enough the importance of calling us if your dog suddenly starts barking at 3 a.m. or you think you see someone in your backyard." Edina police also say they will come to your home and assess its security at no charge. Paul Walsh gC¢ 612_673 -4 18z. Messages in this topic_(i) Reply. (via web post) j Start a new topic Message.•. I Rec I Phelos I links I Database I Polls I t4emheM I CPIendar Sent by Heather Wallace 25K- ;0855 for the White Dole; Association. Chang. selling, via hie. Web (Yahool M required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to „Dally Digest I Switch format to Tmdlhona Vklt Ymu Group I Yahonr rrnnps Trmnc_ot 1,14! I Ilncuhrsrihe Delete I Reply a Forward Spam Move_. Previous I Next I Back to Messages Visit Your Group Curves on Yatuod Share & discuss Curves, fitness and weight loss. Special K Group on Yahool Groups Learn how others are losing pounds. All -Bran Day 10 Club an Yahool Groups Feel better with fiber. Copyright ® I994-20D8 Yahoo! Inc All notes reserved Torre. of service - Guidelines NOTICE We aspect po.arul mlonwaon on this r .. To team more about how we use your ini—axon, see out prNVey Policy Select ly—We EnxlBrrg I Fug Headers Search Mali 1 Search the Web http: / /us.mc544.mail. yahoo. com/ mclshowMessage ;_+lt= AtZWijv3Ii.Nt5XC4dZln9l jk7OX... 8/25/2008 White Oaks Sidewalk Petition - Inbox - Yahoo! Mail Page 2%02 A M -lah Mall Contacts Calendar Notepad I What's New? Mobile Mail OAtions Check Mail Compose f Netflix L Only $4.99/mo. Folders [Add - Edit] Inbox (45) ,. Drafts (27) -- -- - -�- Sent Spam [Empty] Trash [Empty] ..._... --._.- ..._.,........ -- . My Folders [Hide] 50th law schoo... Previous I Next I Back to Messages Delete Reply Forward Spam Move... w White Oaks Sidewalk Petition From: "Karin L. wille" <karinwille @comcast.net> Search Mail Search the Web Mark as Unread I Print Monday, November 3, 2006 2:24 PM To: AppeldomC @aol.com, LRMullis @comcast.net, EDASKI @aol.com, jschuet @hotmaii.com, fbennett @lindquist.com, grah0054 @umn.edu, kim.gordon4 @comcast.net, amoam @yahoo.com, susanwahman @edinarealty.com, peggyfrank @att.net, RKTCHarmon @aol.com, joebethkiley @yahoo.com, l.markusen @earthlink.net... more Hello, White Oaks neighbors, brian I As you may know, the city has completed a feasibility study regarding installing a sidewalk on burger the west side of France in the 4600 and 4700 block. The feasibility study was initiated in I response to a petition from primarily Morningside residents. We've reviewed the petition and it csjohnnyoconno... appears that most people who signed it could just as easily get to 50th and France by going godfrey house down Grimes to Arden, as most of the signers live on or west of Grimes. honeywell The engineering department has determined that a sidewalk is feasible but that all the trees in Joe Chu I the city right of way (and possibly some trees that are on private property) will have to be cut laney, lyndon ... i down to install it In addition, there will be no room for new landscaping because the space My Attachments _......_.. .. - .' between the property lines and France is so narrow. miscellaneous i nostp148 The property owners in the 4700 block of Meadow Road do not want the sidewalk to be built for platers homeco... a variety of reasons, including loss of green space and the cost to taxpayers of installing and maintaining a sidewalk that it appears very few people would use. We would prefer that the city . ewert milo sl _,_.__._....._� look at installing a crosswalk on France at 47 th or 48 th to make it easier to cross France and get -- -- - - - -- - - - - -- to schools, parks and Lake Harriet. - -- - ------ - search shortcuts We have started a petition stating the above. Many of you have already signed and more will be My Photos ; canvassed this week. However, if we miss you and you'd Ike to sign, please call or stop by any i of your neighbors on the 4700 Meadow Road block, and we'll make the petition available to My Attachments _......_.. .. - .' you. ADVERTISEMENT Thanks so much. Check Mail Compose Karin Wlle and Mike Casserly, for the 4700 Meadow Road neighbors 952/924 -0700 Delete Reply Forward Spam Move... w Previous I Next I Back to Messages Select Message Encoding I Full Headers Search Mail Search the Web Copyright 0 1994 -2008 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Service - Copyright/IP Policy - Guidelines NOTICE: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our Privacy Policy A_ Spam (1) [Empty] Trash [Empty] Below find two emails sent from the Edina Police Dept forwarded by My Feldars [Hid.] Diane Feldman —Big thanks to Diane y"hnol My Y.lhoGl rl.d M.- ell, ets_eeail Sign Out All -'laly Mail Help _ -:..- -s •1 a' i:' P; :� p 1' f p I L Search WEB SEARCH csjohnnyoconno ... an seven of these burglaries Entering occupied homes or buildings is godfrey house relatively rare for mostburglaries reported to us We did haves nine burglaries prior to this current increase that were solved by honeywell the arrest of a career burglarwho had recently been released from Joe Chu ....- .,.�.� ...�. •., ,... ..5�' -:e51 •2ic'� -w.-r £�ti _•.. i IF.id' ��r The three most relent Country Chub burglaries and three from the 57oci M2lI I Contacts Calendar Notepad What's New? Mobile Mall Options Check Mail Compass platers homeco... Search Msll Search the Wch (4 See yuur credit Previous I Next I Back to Messages siewert milo Mark as Unread I Print 1� score - free De1Me Reply r Forward I Spam Move.... Folders [Add - Edit) To prated your privacy, Yahoo! Mail has blocked remote images in this message. show Images - options Inbox (23) [whiteoaksedina] Two Crime Alerts from the Police Dept -More Details Sunday, August 17, 2008 7:09 AM Drafts (24) From: While Oaks Improvement Assoc' <Jschuet @holmall.com> Sent To: v hitmaksedina(eyahor graups.rom Spam (1) [Empty] Trash [Empty] Below find two emails sent from the Edina Police Dept forwarded by My Feldars [Hid.] Diane Feldman —Big thanks to Diane 501h law schoo... The Edina Police Department has issued a Grime Alert due to an brian increase in residential burglaries in the northeast quadrdot of the city. The County Club area has had ten burglaries reported since June burger tst Of particular concern is that entry was made into occupied homes csjohnnyoconno ... an seven of these burglaries Entering occupied homes or buildings is godfrey house relatively rare for mostburglaries reported to us We did haves nine burglaries prior to this current increase that were solved by honeywell the arrest of a career burglarwho had recently been released from Joe Chu incarceration. laney, lyndon ... The three most relent Country Chub burglaries and three from the 57oci miscellaneous block of 7`aitb involved window screens that were cut and entry made noslp148 . through open windows All occurred in the middle of the night - platers homeco... rmci to 4:oo AM approximately. This has not been confined to Edina - similerburglaries in Sts Louis Pads, Hopkins and south Minneapolis siewert milo have resulted in Grime Alerts in those cities We are working with Search Shortcuts My Photos My Attachments Burner k3uy Stocks No account minimum required. ING . IIIRFCT those departments to develop any patterns to help direct our resources. I have mlren calls from residents concerned about the lack of strect lighting due to the construction. I talked to the City Engineer about this and he will see if parts of the project an be expedited to improve the fighting. We are not sure that the construction is a contributing factor due to the multiple areas being hit by the same type of burglaries The loss has generally been easily transportable items - cash or credit cards from purses and wallets, laptops, !Pods Alcohol was taken in a couple of burglaries, indicating young adults or teens Cars have been stolen in several of the burglaries. I have received requests for increased presence of marked squads but that does not address this type of crime. Ky trerda have indicated that the saspec (s) are being dropped off end picked up by car. The suspects are walking through the yards and at that time of night they can hear an approaching car from 1/4 mile away. We are doing saturation patrol with bicycles and unmarked cars during the targeted hours. We are asking people to leave outside lights on, make sure doors are locked and to immediately report any suspicious activity. The cat screens and window entry call for h useased security on ground level windows - either locking the windows or using stops to prohibit fully opening the window. We are hopeful that the increased awareness of the residents and the increased (unmarked) police presence will help put an end to these burglaries Mike SSitad Chief of Police At least two Country Club homes were entered by criminals on Tuesday night.(Augustm) According to the residents, in both cases the perpetrators gained arxess through a dosed, but unlocked, ground - floor window. The screens were art through. In one case cash was removed from purses and wallets. In the other, car keys were obtained and a car was stolen. If you see a black Mercedes 35o ML SW license number RCP 242, call portre. In recent weds, according to residents, another home was entered after the perpetrators gained access to a garage door opener in an unlocked car, entered the garage, but failed to gain amass to the home since the door to the home was locked. RECENT ACTIVITY New Members _ Visit Your Group Get in Shape an Yahool Groups Find a buddy and lose weight Yahool Groups Familyographer Zone Join a group and share your pictures. Real Food Group Share recipes and favorite meals wf Real Food lovers. http: / /us.mc544.mail. yahoo. com/ mc/ showMessage ;_+lt= AtZWijv3Ii.Nt5XC4dZln91 jk7OX... 8/25/2008 158'g%MJ�ININSR100 62 PR io MINE 1 HIM I= q- I1121 494 17 31 R RESOLUTION NO. 2009-18 FRANCE AVENUE SIDEWALK (WEST 48TH STREET TO SUNNYSIDE ROAD) IMPROVEMENT NO. S -101 City of Edina WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 3rd day of November, 2008, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed France Avenue Sidewalk, Improvement No. S -101; and WHEREAS, said hearing was continued on two occasions, 2nd day of December, 2008, and 6`h day of January, 2009; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed noticed and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 3rd day of February, 2009, for Improvement No. S -101, France Avenue Sidewalk, from West 48`h Street to Sunnyside Road, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. S -101, France Avenue Sidewalk, from West 48`h Street to Sunnyside Road. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. S -101, France Avenue Sidewalk, from West 48`h Street to Sunnyside Road, is hereby ordered as proposed with construction of the improvement to be completed during the 2009 construction season. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the feasibility report for Improvement No. S -101 is hereby received by the Edina City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. Attest: Adopted this 3rd day of February, 2009. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 3 o Cn � ay N ea. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II.B. Consent ❑ From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: February 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA ® To Council Subject: Phase 1 of the Gateway Redevelopment Project - Action ® Motion Final Site Plan and Parking Stall Variance. ® Resolution Ordinance Discussion Planning Commission Recommended Action. On December 30, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Final Site Plan and parking stall Variance. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes and resolution. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: On January 8, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously recommended approval of the parking variances. (See the attached minutes.) Staff has appealed the Boards decision to allow the City Council to take action on the entire proposal. Inf ormati on/B ackground: See attached Planning Commission report which includes the staff recommendation for approval; the minutes and development plans. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-19 OVING A FINAL SITE PLAN WITH A PARKING STALL VARIANCE FOR PHASE 1 OF GATEWAY /ED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. City Of Edina 1.01 Wayzata Properties is requesting final site plan and a parking stall variance of 100 stalls for Phase 1 of the Gateway redevelopment project. 1.02 Phase 1 is to be an 80,000 square foot, 7 -story 150 room hotel. The site is legally described as follows: Tracts A,B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 On December 30, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requests. 1.04 On January 8, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the parking stall variance. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Site Plan and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) The Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. 3) The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use is reasonable. It provides a reasonable on -site parking for the hotel and existing office buildings, based on the parking study that was performed by Kinley -Horn. b. The proposed hotel is Phase 1 of an Overall Development Plan for the site that includes new office buildings and parking ramps. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Site Plan with the requested Variance to allow the hotel construction. Approval is subject to the following_ Conditions: City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-19 Page Two 1) The site must be developed and maintained mi conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped October 27, 2008. • Grading & drainage plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Utility plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Lighting plan date stamped October 27, 2008. 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building. 4) Compliance with all conditions listed by the city engineer in his memo dated November 18, 2008. 5) Compliance with all conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6) All Phase 1 public improvements, per the approved Development Agreement, must be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 7) Nine (9) bike stalls must be included on the site. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on February 3 =d, 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor a' RESOLUTION NO. 2009-19 Rage Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 3, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2009. City Clerk variances t the City recently granted variances for a housing commercial development a Ibq9 69th and York/Xerxes. Member Fischer com that it was mentioned Kt the YMCA remaining open could be consi self imposed hards ; however, in a sense the YMCA should remacause it's an a resource which is the reason for the preseo desi ion. Commissioner Fischer pointed out the uniqueness -1 zo ' r this site, adding the R -1 zoning of the site could be viewed rd ntinuing, Commissioner Fischer said the 50' setback ould be sidered out of scope and scale compared with MDD g district. Co uding, Member Fischer also said in looking at all the de easy to forget tha is is conceptually a good project. Chair LpWsbury called for the vote. All Commissioners voted aye. Motion 2008.0014.08a Final Development Plan Mortenson Development/Wayzata Properties 7701 Normandale Road, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague told the Commission Mortenson Development on behalf of Wayzata Properties is requesting a Final Development Plan and a parking stall variance of 100 stalls for Phase 1 of the Gateway Development. The specific request is to tear down two of the existing pentagon tower office buildings and build a new 7 -story, 150 -room, 80,000 square foot Starwood Hotel at 7701 Normandale Road. Planner Teague noted the proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan approved for this site as part of the Gateway Overall Development Plan.. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends approval of the Final Development Plan and parking stall variance to tear down two office buildings and build a new 7 -story hotel at 7701 Normandale Road for Wayzata Properties based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) The Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. 3) The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use is reasonable. It provides a reasonable on -site parking for the hotel and existing office buildings, based on the parking study that was performed by Kimley -Horn. b. The proposed hotel is Phase 1 of an Overall Development Plan for the site that includes new office buildings and parking ramps. C. Upon full build out of the approved Overall Development Plan, there would be no shortage of parking on the site. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped October 27, 2008. • Grading & drainage plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Utility plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Lighting plan date stamped October 27, 2008. 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building. 4) Compliance with all conditions listed by the city engineer in his memo dated November 18, 2008. 5) Compliance with all conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6) All Phase 1 public improvements, per the approved Development Agreement, must be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Appearing for the Applicant Chris Hickok, Dan Quail, Mortenson Development Applicant Presentation Mr. Hickok addressed the Commission explaining the construction of the 150 - room Aloft hotel and the removal of 21,990 square feet of office space is part of Phase I of the Gateway project. Mr. Hickok told the Commission the building 6 materials from the razed Pentagon Office tower wings will be recycled into the proposed new hotel. Concluding, Mr. Hickok said the hotel will be constructed with sustainable aspects to include water filtration, indoor air quality, white roof, and electric car plug -ins and the approval process will coincide with the Overall Development Agreement with the City. Comments and Questions from the Commission Commissioners commented on the exterior building materials and color scheme. Mr. Hickok told the Commission that Aloft hotels are a concept of Starwood, adding there are 30 Aloft hotels nationwide and one in Minneapolis. Mr. Hickok said there is commonality in the exterior materials and colors used in Aloft hotels. A discussion focused on the parking and the phasing of the project. The current difficulty in the economy was pointed out and the possibility the entire build -out of the project may not occur. Planner Teague agreed and responded staff considered that, which was the reason staff required a detailed parking study for the project, and that a parking variance is also required for Phase I. Concluding, Planner Teague pointed out office and hotel peak times usually don't coincide and the remaining office wings have has a 60% occupancy rate. Public Comment None Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval based on staff findings 1, 2 and 3,a.b. eliminate c., and subject to staff conditions 1 through 6 with the additional condition that nine (9) bike stations be added. Commissioner seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion approved. 2008.00671. 08b Amend Final DevelopmentBWn Mohagen Hansen/Twin es Orthopedics 401065 th St West/6t rance Avenue Presentation by Planner Planner Teague informed the qp4mi s Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group, on behalf of Twin Ci ' Orthopedics d Southdale Fairview Hospital is requesting an amended al Development Pla nd driveway setback variances with the following c geog: 10 Draft Minutes Edina Zoning Board January 8, 2009 Members Present: Schroeder, Davidson, Hornig, Vasaly, Scherer B -08-68 Mortenson Development Wayzata Properties 7701 Normandale Rd Request: Parking Variance Presentation by Planner Planner Teague informed the Board Mortenson Development on behalf of Wayzata Properties is requesting a parking stall variance of 100 stalls for Phase 1 of the Gateway Development The specific request is to tear down two of the existing pentagon tower office buildings and build a new 7 -story, 150 -room, 80,000 square foot Starwood Hotel at 7701 Normandale Road. Planner Teague explained that based on the -square footage of the remaining office buildings and the new hotel, 755 parking stalls are required to support the project. The site plan demonstrates that 655 spaces'are proposed and existing between these uses. Kimley -Horn also performed an examination of the proposed parking and finds that there would be no shortage of parking; as the peak demand for uses on'the site are staggered. Planner Teague pointed out once the entire development is built out, there would not be a parking shortage, as the ramps that�are proposed to be part of future phases of development; the additional parking would be provided. ,Planner Teague concluded staff recommends approval of the parking stall variance to tear down two office buildings and build a new 7 -story hotel at 7701 Normandale Road for Wayzata Properties based on the following findings. 1) The'proposed, use is reasonable. It provides a reasonable on -site parking for the hotel and existing office buildings, based on the parking study that was performed by Kimley -Horn. 2) The practical ,difficulty is caused by the existing buildings on site. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1) City Council approval of the Final Site Plan for the site. 2) The variance will expire one year from the date of approval, unless an approved a time extension has been granted from the City Council or Zoning Board of Appeals. Comments from the Board Member Brown noted when the project is "built out" parking will meet Code. Member Davidson pointed out in reality the ultimate "build out" has no bearing on this request; however, he believes this would work because the combined uses don't share the same peak times. Planner Teague agreed, pointing out the traffic analysis recognizes that peak traffic times are almost the opposite with the majority of trips for the hotel occurring on weekends. Member Schroeder agreed, adding there will be a small overlap, but the overlap is very limited. Board Action Member Vasaly moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Member Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 2 ty9iN�1f� Ok e En PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague December 30, 2008 2008- 0014.08a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Mortenson Development on behalf of Wayzata Properties is requesting a Final Development Plan and a parking stall variance of 100 stalls for Phase 1 of the Gateway Development. (See overall Phasing Plan on page A5.) The specific request is to tear down two of the existing pentagon tower office buildings and build a. new 7 -story, 150 -room, 80,000 square foot Starwood Hotel at 7701 Normandale Road. (See project location on pages Al —A2 and the applicant narrative and proposed plans on pages A3 —A25.) The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan approved for this site as part of the Gateway Overall Development Plan. (See approved Overall /Preliminary Plans on pages A5 —A8.) Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Burgundy Place, mixed use retail and residential; zoned and guided for mixed use. Easterly: Pentagon office buildings and light industrial uses; zoned and guided for mixed use. Southerly: Office buildings within the City of Bloomington. Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The subject property is relatively flat, 12 acres in size, and contains seven office buildings. (See pages Al —A2.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Zoning: MDD -6, Mixed Development District Site Access The primary access to the hotel would be via two new entrance /exits off Normandale Road. (See page A9.) Existing access points would still be available off Viking Drive, 77th Street and Computer Avenue. Traffic Kimley -Horn conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both Kimley -Horn and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See pages A27 —A53.) Per the original approval of the overall - development plan, mitigation measures are required for this overall project. These measures are spelled out specifically in the Preliminary Development Plan Agreement for Gateway. There are no traffic improvements that are required for Phase 1. The Transportation Commission considered the project at their November 20, 2008 meeting, and recommended approval. (See draft minutes on pages A54 —A56.) Parking Based on the square footage of the remaining office buildings and the new hotel, 755 parking stalls are required to support the project. The site plan demonstrates that 655 spaces are proposed and existing between these uses. A variance is requested for the parking stall shortage. Kimley -Horn also performed an examination of the proposed parking and finds that there would be no shortage of parking; as the peak demand for uses on the site are staggered. (See page A3f.) Once the entire development is built out, there would not be a parking shortage, as the ramps that are proposed to be part of future phases of development; the additional parking would be provided. (See page A5 —A7.) Building Design The building would be made of grey metal siding, with red and tan stucco accents. The underside of the porte cochere and rooftop mechanical equipment would have a variation of yellow and blue panels. There would also be a scattering of blue and yellow shutters (See attached page A4.) The applicant will have a sample board that shows construction materials at both the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Landscaping Based on the per of the site, 66 overstory trees are required. The applicant is proposing 77 overstory trees, in addition to the 100 +existing over -story trees on the site. The applicant is also proposing over 450 understory shrubs and perennials. Therefore the site would far exceed the minimum City Code requirements. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The applicant is proposing to utilize permeable or porous asphalt in areas of the parking lot. Rain gardens and a grit chamber are proposed to filter out sediment from site runoff. (See pages A11 —A16.) The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and found them to be acceptable. (See page A26.) A more detailed review and permit is required from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for mixed uses. The hotel would be permitted in the MDD -6 Zoning district. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; The proposal is also consistent with the previously approved Preliminary/Overall Development Plan for this site, which called for a 7 -story 80,000 square foot 150 - room hotel. (See the approved preliminary/Overall Development Plans on pages A5 —A8.) The height of the building would be slightly shorter than the approved preliminary plan, which showed a maximum height of 92 feet to the top of the mechanical equipment, and 86 feet to the mechanical equipment is proposed. c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The hotel would not be detrimental to surrounding property. It is part of the Gateway Development Plan which includes a mixture of uses including retail and residential to the north, and office buildings to the east. There are several hotels in the immediate area to the west and south within the City of Bloomington. d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; and e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The proposal would not result in an overly- intensive land use. As discussed as part of the Overall Development Plan, the traffic will be shifted away from 77th 3 street, closer to the access to Highway 100, with the development of the hotel and office buildings on the Pentagon Tower site, and the senior housing replacing the Pentagon Park offices south of the Fred Richards golf course. Senior housing does not generate as much traffic as an office or retail uses, and the trips generated would generally be at off -peak times. A traffic study was completed by Kimley -Horn and determined that this first phase of development could be supported by the existing roadways. (See attached traffic study.) The Transportation Commission reviewed the study and recommended approval of the project subject to conditions. (See minutes on pages A54 —A56.) e) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and With the exception of the parking space variance, the proposal conforms to the provisions of the City Code. f) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. El Compliance Table As demonstrated below, the proposal would meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements: * Variance Requested Parking Stall Variance Per Section 850.04.Subd.l .F., of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests: a. Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. 5 City Standard Proposed Front 55 feet 89 feet Side 55 feet 61 feet Rear NA NA Building Height. No Maximum 7- stories & 86 feet to top of (overall /prelim. dev plan approved height was 7- mechanical penthouse stories and 92 feet to mechanical penthouse) Parking lot and 20 feet (street) 20 feet drive aisle setback Over -story Trees 66 required 200+ existing & proposed (number is based on the perimeter of the entire site) Building 30% 22% Coverage Maximum Floor 1,881,134 square foot site 1,881,134 s.f. total allowed Area Ratio (FAR) (for the entire (80,000 s.f. approved for the hotel) 80,000 s.f. proposed MDD -6 District) Parking Stalls — . 755 spaces (based on square footage of 655 spaces total at the hotel Mixed existing offices and the hotel) and office site* Development District * Variance Requested Parking Stall Variance Per Section 850.04.Subd.l .F., of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests: a. Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. 5 Staff believes that the requested variance is reasonable. The applicant hired Kimley -Horn to examine the proposed parking to determine if they would be providing enough parking. (See pages A3e —A3f.) Kimley -Horn concluded that there would not be a shortage of parking, based on the shared uses and staggered peak times. The situation is also to be temporary, until Phases 3 and 5 are built. The Overall Development Plan has demonstrated that it would meet all minimum parking requirements. The overall plan does not take into account the staggered peak times for the uses, and the shared parking arrangement. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing buildings on site. The proposed Phase 1 building and parking plan is reasonable given the parking study conclusion is that there would be adequate parking between the uses. The study assumed 100% occupancy of building, and the actual occupancy of the existing office buildings is 60 %. b. Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is that the proposal is for the first phase of an Overall Development Plan that meets the city's minimum parking requirements. c. Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Recommend approval of the Final Development Plan and parking stall variance to tear down two office buildings and build a new 7 -story hotel at 7701 Normandale Road for Wayzata Properties. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) The Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. 3) The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 2 a. The proposed use is reasonable. It provides a reasonable on -site parking for the hotel and existing office buildings, based on the parking study that was performed by Kimley -Horn. b. The proposed hotel is Phase 1 of an Overall Development Plan for the site that includes new office buildings and parking ramps. Upon full build out of the approved Overall Development Plan, there would be no shortage of parking on the site. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: - • Site plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped October 27, 2008. • Grading & drainage plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Utility plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped October 27, 2008. • Lighting plan date stamped October 27, 2008. 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building. 4) Compliance with all conditions listed by the city engineer in his memo dated November 18, 2008. 5) Compliance with all conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6) All Phase 1 public improvements, per the approved Development Agreement, must be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Deadline for a city decision: January 20, 2009 7 0 Edna A* oI r Y � tar rt''iS l r ,z "y! \:�N ► rc F% 77TN srw f 1 iF .0 yFl,.ia t I ., a✓ �S *iRf frC •, �. `� t ''tlrf ti!`� klflrirr�i j i'ot nn 1 J3�fH r f 7771 � - 17 f7r. rs lie .,. .'a v 1. 1 Y4eN P113:3102824330010 4950 Viking Dr Edina, MN 55435 Legend House Number Laheis Street Name Labels .1 City Limits ^/ Creeks 0 Lake Namrs LLakcs Li Parks Ej P.—IS 2006 Aerial Phalo August 28, 2008 Written Statement describing intended use of ProireK�y The intended use of the property is a seven story, 150 room Starwood hotel.. This project was approved in the overall Gateway development plans at the March 18, 2008 Edina City Council meeting. Wayzata Properties is a locally based owner of office properties. Other projects that Wayzata Properties has worked on in the area include Burgundy Place (under construction) and the entire master plan for the Edina Gateway Development. November 21, 2008 Cary Teague, AICP Planning Director City of Edina 4801 W. 51P St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: aloft Edina Project Narrative Dear Mr. Teague: sce-A Mortenson development Mortenson Development, Inc. 700 Meadow lane North Minneapolis, MN 55422 -4899 main 763.522.2100 fax 763.287.5457 www.mortenson.com Per your request, I am submitting a project description and narrative for aloft Edina hotel. The Edina Gateway redevelopment consists of over 43 acres of property along West 770 Street, including all of the area known as Pentagon Park. Constructed In the 1950's as a prime office address within the City of Edina, Pentagon Park has aged, become underutilized, and lost its position on the office market. it is, however, a prime location with potential to be re{leveloped. The Edina Gateway redevelopment will once again position this area of the City as a leader in the Twin Cities mixed use office / residential market. The overall Gateway development plans were approved by the Edina city council on March 18, 2008. Goal Edina Gateway will become a premier mixed -use community in the Twin Cities, providing intergenerational residential living, state-of- the-art Class A commercial space. and innovative business traveler accommodations. The transformation of this commercial area of Edina into a Vibrant district will include new uses, community connections and creative environmental design that will demonstrate Edina's position as a premier community for living and working. Phasing and Sequencing The redevelopment at both Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads will be implemented in phases over a period of 7 to 10 years, subject to the demands and opportunities of the marketplace. A coordinated implementation plan includes selective demolition of existing structures as new buildings are constructed. This strategy will maintain a balance of new and existing buildings until all phases are completed. The towers site will have 3 phases, constructed from west to east, the first new structure being a hotel with high visibility from highways 100 and 494. The hotel phase consists of a seven story, 150 room Starwood hotel. Chamber of C®Gnruuerce The current plan is to have the Edina Chamber of Commerce relocate their offices to the first floor of the hotel building. They would have their own entrance and would not be connected to the hotel operations. 0 Ass Primary access to the hotel will be on the TH 100 Frontage Road (Hormandale Road). It was assumed that a small percentage of office traffic would use the hotel driveway to access the executive parking under the west office building. Additional information regarding turning movements at access locations can be found in the Traffic Analysis. TraEfic/TMnsporudion A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Edina Gateway was prepared according to the City of Edina guidelines and based on land use and site plan information at the Overall Development Plan level of detail. The detailed methodology, assumptions, and results of the traffic analysis are contained in the Traffic Study Report. The traffic study documents the existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, estimated the net traffic generated by each phase of the development, assigned these trips to the adjacent roadway system, and evaluated the traffic operations of key intersections near the site and those providing access to and from the site. Parking Current Edina City Code would require 711 spaces for the existing buildings that total 168,496 square feet, which is greater than the 626 spaces currently provided. However, there is no current parking shortage on the site. This is due at least in part to the current occupancy rate of 66.5 percent and the inefficiencies of the current office product. During the demolition and construction phases, City Code would require 632 spaces based on the 146,506 square feet remaining compared to the 587 spaces that would be available. Similar to the existing condition, factoring the required number of spaces by the occupancy rate, only 420 spaces would be expected to be needed and no parking shortage would be expected. Upon completion of the hotel, a total of 655 parking spaces will be provided. City Code requires 170 spaces for the hotel and 632 spaces for the office, for a total of 802 spaces. Again, the office uses would be expected to generate a significantly lower parking demand compared to that calculated using City Code due in part to the occupancy rates on the site. Further, the hotel and office are compatible uses for shared parking because the peak time for parking at the office would be the off -peak for parking at the hotel and vise versa. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) shared parking calculation results in a maximum parking demand of 634 spaces on the site, which is less than the 655 parking spaces provided. Based on the occupancy and shared parking, no parking shortages are expected, even though the site does not meet City Code in terms of the number of parking spaces provided. Wetland Delineation Wetland delineation was performed on the Totnvers Site on October 12, 2007. Based on the site history, development and maintenance of the site as an office park, and the lack of any wetland indicators (hydrology or wetland vegetation), it is our conclusion that there are no wetlands present within the boundaries of the Pentagon Park — Towers Site. Domestic Water Water service to the Pentagon Park Development is currently provided by the City of Bloomington's water system, Proposed water service is planned to be City of Edina water. The aloft Hotel will connect to the Edina city water on Viking Drive, located south of the proposed site improvements. sanitary Severer A31 The aloft site will construct an 6" sanitary sewer connection to the existing 9" main in Viking Drive. Demolition of the two office building will remove 9 Service Availability Charges (SACs) from the site. The hotel will add 75 SACs to the site, for a net increase of 66 SACs. Storm Water Management Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is the local governing unit with jurisdiction regarding storm water management. The Starwood Hotel has met or exceeded the District's rules. Storm water management strategies for the Stanwood Hotel include bioretention, filtration, rainwater capture, permeable pavements, Infiltration and underground storage. Landscape Design Landscape has been designed to meet the City of Edina Code. Sustainabiliity and Construction A goal of Edina Gateway is to preserve and enhance our natural environment through sustainable building, site design and construction. it is the intent of the Developer, through all of its projects to achieve a high level of environmental performance, durability, and healthy indoor air quality through integrated design, best practices and.emerging technologies. Design and construction of Starwood Hotel will strive to incorporate the following initiatives: Materials and Use: Use materials that minimize environmental impact; are made of engineered, reclaimed, recycled- content; have minimal packaging waste; and are low toxic, durable, and easily recycled after use. Design for adaptability and minimize material use. Encourage waste reduction and recycling with a jobsite waste management plan and convenient recycling stations. • Create a jobsite waste management plan • Sort construction waste for. appropriate recycling • "White roof on section of the lower roof of the building • Use of recycled aggregate in concrete and asphalt Water Efficiency and Use: Consider innovative water technologies. Minimize use of potable water. Consider water efficient technologies. • Management of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan & Erosion Control • Storm water management strategies for the Stanwood Hotel include bioretention, filtration, rainwater capture, permeable pavements, infiltration and underground storage. • Water Efficiency - water efficient landscaping & water use reduction indoor Air Quality: Aim to reduce pollutant sources in both Interior and exterior environments by the design of interior materials. Minimize chemical usage during all project phases. Avoid ozone depleting chemicals in mechanical equipment and insulation. Protect the health of worker occupants and construction staff. Include systems for air cleaning, humidity control, and thermal comfort. o Indoor Air Quality - seal ducts to minimize dust in the HVAC system during construction and then clean ducts at commissioning 43 c o Use of low - emitting Materials — adhesives, sealants, paints, coatings, carpet systems, composite wood, controllability of lighting and thermal systems, daylight and views for 90 % of spaces. Outdoor Environment: Minimize environmental disturbances during construction. Site buildings for efficient building footprint and orientation. Reduce the amount of excavation. Maintain site water flows to minimize erosion and on -site erasion control. Utilize innovative storm water management techniques Implement low impact/low maintenance landscaping. Increase pervious surface area. • Efficient development density and community connectivity • Access to alternative public transportation • Stormwater system designed to efficiently control the quantity and quality • Water efficient landscaping • Comprehensive traffic management plan We look forward to our upcoming meetings with City staff and commission. In the meantime, if you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 763 -267 -5399. Sincerely, Chris Winter Senior Project Manager Kimley -Horn � and Associates, Inc. Parking ] memorandum Suite 345N 2550 University Avenue West St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 To: Cary Teague, Planning Director, City of Edina Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer, City of Edina CC: Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer, City of Edina From: JoNette Kuhnau, PE, PTOE Date: December 8, 2008 RE: Edina Gateway (Pentagon Park Redevelopment) Phase 1— Aloft Hotel Final Development Plan Parking Analysis The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify and update the parking analysis completed for the Aloft Hotel (Phase 1 of the Edina Gateway project) that was discussed in the Traffic Impact Analysis dated October 2008. The existing Towers site (the area bounded by W 77a' Street, Viking Drive, Computer Avenue and Normandale Avenue) does meet Edina City Code for parking. Based on the current Mixed Development District QvIDD) zoning, Edina City Code requires 614 spaces' for the existing office buildings on the site that-total 168,496 square feet (s.£); compared to the 626 spaces currently provided. However, based on Edina City Code for Offices, the previous zoning of the Towers site, 711 spaces would be required. There is no current parking shortage on the Towers site. During the demolition and construction portion of Phase 1, prior to the Aloft Hotel becoming operational, City Code will require the Towers site to provide 632 parking spaces, based on the 146,506 s.£ of office space remaining on the site, compared to the 587 spaces that would be available. Based on the existing conditions, no parking shortages would be expected during the construction phase. upon completion of the hotel, a total of 655 parking spaces will be provided for the hotel and office uses. Based on the MDD zoning, City Code requires a total of 768 spaces3 based on the total square footage of all uses (84,000 s.£ hotel plus 146,506 s.£ office). Once the hotel is completed, it is important to consider that the hotel and office are compatible uses for shared parking because the peak time for parking at the office would be the off -peak for parking at the hotel and vise versa. The parking on the site is r GFA/[(GFA x 0.0005) + 1901 2 GFA/[(GFA x 0.00025) + 1951 3 GFA/300 December 8, 2008 G Page I of 2 TEL 651 645 4197 FAX 651 645 5116 convenient for both uses because it is in close proximity to both the hotel and the office buildings. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking Manual provides an accepted method to compute shared parking demand for compatible uses, such as office/hotel or office/residential. Parking calculations for the Towers site show that the maximum hotel parking demand based on the `Hotel- Business' category would be 188 spaces (1.25 spaces /room) during the hotel's peak hour, which is 9:00 PM on weekdays. The office, based on the '100,000 gross square feet' category, would require a total of 489 parking spaces (3.34 spaces per 1,000 s.£)'during its peak hours, which are 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM on weekdays. The hotel and office do not have the same peak hour of parking demand, and therefore the total peals parking demand is less than the 677 spaces calculated by adding the peak hotel demand to the peak office demand. Based on the ULI time -of -day factors, the parking demand for the office use is only 3 percent of maximum at the hotel peak hour (9:00 PM weekdays), therefore it is the office peak hour that determines the maximum total parking demand. At 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM on weekdays, the tunes of peak parking demand for the office, the demand for hotel parking by guests is only 60 percent of maximum and parking by employees is 100 percent of maximum, for a total of 128 spaces. This results in a maximum total parking demand for the office (489 spaces) and hotel (128 spaces) of 617 spaces on the site, and the 655 parking spaces provided would adequately service this demand. The ULI parking rates do assume that both the hotel and office are 100 percent occupied in the calculation of the peak parking demand. Based on the ability for the office and hotel to share parking even under full occupancy, no parking shortages are expected, even though the site does not meet Edina City Code for MDD zoning in terns of the total number of parking spaces provided. 4 Shared Parkin,; Second Edition, Urban Land Institute, Washington, D. C., 2005. December 8, 2008 Page 2 of 2 v"t H Jg, Lpj I r II II II �! U ���II �� j 11 � Il e� II I� �� �� -• -LLB II I� �1 I PEI- it ;; z TL im STREET 111111117 R.Val—. HIM A=5 P AO r m njtrrnTrmM1IM11rMTr[n=1rm cak9 INN II II I�i7TT111THH� f' lu 11 1 mill• a rill u WILLMAILLUILWIL' W ti`A I,1 EE 71-j -1141i III -N OT", AAE ZWO AM MR-1 1414, R4 — — — — ...... Jiwlkli"Ll� Z'r! ------- ---- L�j IL BMW . ----MH ­--- SFFW --------- - QUADS SITE EDINA GATEWAY rnider d=u�nv�A2dgdfisF—EWAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT DRAWING NAM OVERALL DEVELOPMENT pI/Hd GATE-PHASE01 DGL to DESIG ED B;. Wft&M&dprc:IzWb.7 OVERALL PHMING FLAN Immw and Inc. WP t*-qq.Hm NMI I BRA 8 LLC- do.=, ECK UT: =...a AR 2m HoomnAL rw IN MW NO. C-3 ^7'7%7X'11 1111111 MAESM. \7 'Q� - - - - - - - - - - - - - — ---------- TOWERS SITE R.Val—. HIM A=5 P AO r m njtrrnTrmM1IM11rMTr[n=1rm cak9 INN II II I�i7TT111THH� f' lu 11 1 mill• a rill u WILLMAILLUILWIL' W ti`A I,1 EE 71-j -1141i III -N OT", AAE ZWO AM MR-1 1414, R4 — — — — ...... Jiwlkli"Ll� Z'r! ------- ---- L�j IL BMW . ----MH ­--- SFFW --------- - QUADS SITE EDINA GATEWAY rnider d=u�nv�A2dgdfisF—EWAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT DRAWING NAM OVERALL DEVELOPMENT pI/Hd GATE-PHASE01 DGL to DESIG ED B;. Wft&M&dprc:IzWb.7 OVERALL PHMING FLAN Immw and Inc. WP t*-qq.Hm NMI I BRA 8 LLC- do.=, ECK UT: =...a AR 2m HoomnAL rw IN MW NO. C-3 I- r — u'l - :� l, LO 71300 PARKLAW D5,632 GSF � v% 285 STALLS REQUIRED 400 STALLS PROVIDED 115 STALLS SURPLUS i..SUU yJl . s. 13URGUII DY PLACE, (IvlIXED- sE) 30 UNITS r 4r q 165 , G - TOWNHOMES 60 GSF 5 'ST 5 . ALLS REQUIRED 62 UNITS OSED STALLS 75-STALLS PROVIDED 124 ENCL A - NW BUILDING 230 K GSF OFFICE (4-10 STORIES) 21,000 SF OFFICE WAL - 70 STALLS R n . . . . . . *, 77 STALLS PROVIut_Lj 100 STALLS IRE C WEST PARKING 7 7 LEVELS C=) 1350 STALLS ;J% J - ASSISTED LIVING Zoo UNITS E - E BUILDING H -ANDEPEN r 105 STALLS @ GRADE 'E STALLS ENCLOSED 260 K GSF OFFICE ._j LIVING C' 300 j4_10 STORIES). ".- I . pl p 66 UNITS 3 DO STALLS ;-T ING BUILDING 369 ENCLOSEP. s ' TALLs 'I MST L ob. BUILDING b - HOTEL PROPOSED EAST 30,000 GSF G 150 ROOMS ...a 5LEVELS r D-- sWBUILDING 1050 STALLS 247 K GSF OFFICE (4-12 STORIES) 1 f 100 STALLS REVISED 24 OCTOBER 2007 TOTAL DENSITY IN NEW COMMERCIAL- ADDITIONAL DATA SENIOR HOUSING - ADDITIONAL DATA NOTES. MDDTDlSTRiCT TOTAL GSF = B17.375 TOTAL NEW UNITS 034 PARKING AND UNIT CALCULATION FOUND IN NARRATIVE 250 ALI PARKING REQUIRED 1,110 STALLS DOCUMENT ADDENDUM DATED 24 OCTOBER 2007 0 12 TOTAL GSF 940,567 737,375 GSF OFFICE + 00.000 GSF HOTEL 117 STALLS G PROVIDED 1, TOTAL RES. UNITS = 070 PARKING REQUIRED = 2733 STALLS PARKIN THIS GRAPHIC SUPERSEDES ALL OTHER GRAPHICS IN SCALE IN FT. (INCLUDES BURGUNDY PLACE- PARKING PROVIDED = 2733 STALLS INCLUDES 104 ON STREET STALLS SUBMITTAL FOR UNIT COUNT AND PARTING WALSH TITLE, 7501) PAS PROPOSED SITE PLAN miler dunwida. EDINA CIATEL. -2r ARF.MFEMIRL and Associates. Inc. Pentagon Park Red0V_eI0PM0Bt dj EDINA GATEWAY - FULL SITE �i I' , � _ � _ � ;rte... �'.;. • 1��°�°�� U � C-J •IL7 F.j,t .. - nor raw: tRF7lG,.rg ', ..:. ACTIVE PHASE 1': +F r� O 125 'LSU PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING SCALr ] r\� -' C JI •,� . I:w x a ',I ,- rr .. •� :'.I•��y �.h ,�� , .�_ ' � ... .T 0 yV3�,i - .r � r c o j�- �- T'pf,_r -- ..- l i� - _ "' LYL� "� I v.i._. - 2 A- LOFT HOTEL WEST PARKING EAST BUILDING (4 -11 STORIES: _ — 80,000 gsf 6 LEVELS 1,200 STALLS 360,000 gsf r J 150 ROOMS EAST PARKING TUVVIYFIDME'F TOWNHOME 2 6 LEVELS 1,200 STALLS 7600 PARKLAWN ° 10 UNITS 16 UNITS 9 65,632 gsf m INDEPENDENT LIVING 1 INDEPENDENT LIVING 2 ING 2 A5103 �� 17 BURGUNDY PLACE h 1ZZ UNITS 122 UNITS UNITS 36 UNITS (MIXED USE) 16,560 gsf a 0 ASSISTED LIVING 1 TOWNI ME 3 a 103 UNI S 26 UNITS 16 WALSH TITLE 21,000 gsf (OFFICE) WEST BUILDING (4 -10 STORIES INDEPENDENT LIVING 3 377,375 gsf (OFFICE) 122 UNITS i(iml6y Horne uAMpe,7 m« miller dunwiddie „Y :ntpurrc;rult and Associates. Inc. y EDINA GATEWAY °a,i, 71 �n"UARY 70OR PROPOSED SITE PLAN -2 "w f' Pentagon Park RodevolupmenL Dim Ulp EDINA GATEWAY- COMPLETE PROJECT S 123 N°,th Third 5".ts.h. 104 .A,_...,._ v.....— 6— 1 1 C Re- Zoning and Overall Plan 120171 I MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN I 1 I 1 I 77' MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE � I 1O � iv '1 m I DRIVE MAIN DRIVE DI i MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN 127' � 1 i 00 79' U3 JIRLLI GLLr. I al ga 822' AVERAGE EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION II uj m� 0 dl uI i a l I V/ I� CL J I (fV ' E` VV �,E(:TI(--) h•. LO <II�.I�,IG �dC?R .i I 1 HRGU�H HOTEL. 'WE :1" E,LDG. Ah•:-1 E�` �1 BLDG KEY PLAN I� 1 rs'b' of Z 7 m. wi a� 01 a o® SCALE IN Fr. ademc rtxru nn6mnc wan® miller dunwiddie I �� and AyHom rmlun coax eo.. . xn6Me naclmtclua6 1�. �! andAssociales.Inc. EOINAGATEWI an,>v 71Jnxunxrzv5e sltesECnoNS . Pentagon Park Redeve. nt aax� dig QUADS SITE S °9 177 NwIh7hd SII Suds 156 Wayma Proper ties, LLC. Re- Zoning and Overall Plan -..A. Mx 65601-1657 nqn' - -- - _- l -w. 77TH STREE I -"1 I - -• �'' Ir ®Cf JANUARY 31. 2008. •Imo+ w w ++n�. �. Mortensen 1LG= - n�oao m+oaa .oc.u. 0 rum coma aavu f.7' 7""'1 0 RRN[ Lscunr. rAao k•. r- .,� mm IQmby MOM runwc oea -_— wean ua �p,�p; 1p WI II — U I I 1 �� FUTURE BUILDING •- FUTURE BUILDING Li r PROPOSED Q i ALOFT HOTEL - is I. C[ - I L� r r 1 g _ •_____ -• ...._.._. - FUTURE RAMP -- FUTURE RAMP - r .. U ' I I I..--- •. ............... - — VIKING DRIVE -. ----- - - - - -- - J ---- ............... ..... ---- -- -•---- ---- - -•- q y R ` 1 A -7 /v 1 \E -�I�o OCT 1 7 2000 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL ICTOBER 27, ZOOS OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN I mam-- CI.O w . rm ALOFT EDINA HOTEL [FN R � NO7 �: 1. OEOVERALEN7 VELOPME T BASED OVERALL OEDEPICTED 1 PLAN -"1 I UPON THE UPON SUBIBTTEO 70 THE O7T OF EDINA ON �'' Ir ®Cf JANUARY 31. 2008. •Imo+ w w ++n�. �. Mortensen 1LG= - n�oao m+oaa .oc.u. 0 rum coma aavu f.7' 7""'1 0 RRN[ Lscunr. rAao k•. r- .,� mm IQmby MOM runwc oea -_— wean ua �p,�p; q y R ` 1 A -7 /v 1 \E -�I�o OCT 1 7 2000 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL ICTOBER 27, ZOOS OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN I mam-- CI.O w . rm .¢M nm•n lYla 4.mWl [r cl L x¢Pl [nQV1 rnI 1 I .PV w9 ,Iw I Q Qm Ql I /P,xU4Ivv1T frnQ Q1, 1 m T L [P1r PQ v O x Pt•rm •f p M I1 N 7a r®1rrM9 Q wP•mL't•mm lQ SI 7I® O wM nIuRIILI. l9I1l 1I1 P r w 1 1Iu6w •, _ ..... •�II r. - Y _ ALOFT EOINA HOTEL u MH STET -T .. - - -�— , --- ��_ - -_—�� -C off wi Morteason ROW 1 f � I ® �� - _s1, • � a"P '"'^.m''•L."..'^I :,`.I w".."'w+ � s mrmx m. N xxsu ra cwwanw al.c W.IIIPI � ar•Q aR mi m • •.pJ' Iz � T'� .. . ".. ......I. tmol„n ®QY w4 tnlm I. m -a.-xo G � 1 ' 1 - .. � '"' n .... .':."Y•...N.I...•N..n.� C1 w.•w.uc I ` }: '! ORLILaLON� ms.c soawl* I `t �'G•�` i::a -.. (`.• d, i, 'R ♦iY�_ ..NwN..+....1. ®. ,..e. t... L'_. •:1 " •' r; . ; ! N m Iwa ✓ ,� ' - .' •� : `.j[♦ / . ♦ `� y nay w.aa —` •• - • • I ; ,• ..;5 • _ " - ` \/L, . • ..,i•', � `•? V•.�• ` / ®\�`.� 1 M mlQanw wu Im xlmr mm Iar•4 YL tmoa umrro w mR ':� }.'� =F ti j, . `` \ � %,, ` �• \�.� � /r.� ewwmmQlQat ��'-? y rl • �,,,.p.�l -�M:. "ems,•,". -:���W :P �=' ' • ` ♦ \ ' :. � ,` i � s M cwN•cnN wwt ruvaN mwnw •cmm a Imrtu w wNN w li>, L .•' , , � . • �� -' ?• - " �=' �' $' '' ` � • ,j �' ' • \ � , Mx nm mm u Imnm n M o.m4 w8d9WHWfl L .. _ :►,- = = -i5 R-?;; J.�i ` )•'\ �/ ` `\ `` I a N lmt a ra P.wlmT v nr w.mtnw ro oral sn .mmrs NQ I _ .•� -+�t3 . .•% � ♦ I '`• P•11pr Im ¢L® iQl R1Q1®I MY NY40f IPmI M MIWm•II 81Itl A4lif�AL881IM. a ^ �.� - weer' aP_: \ \ ' �:%' a M ew+ttw ww rnvwQ xt PmNmn mm Haws .•Rws•a � ♦ / \ � ` � ` f �: � % �' PmaPU u smm® rYU m M mw ®m11 v ¢mnlw ♦, f ` -_ — -.3 ♦ . ` .( ' � .P r � S M POIQIew_Rm 1: [11CIm_n G' -1 G1� M1 UN' CJ: /11J unll l 1 i i : /r1 , /-- .� �— .3 :,, '• • �• /`••� rR.;.• ,,.;. ' ' /I. 1 ' /PaoY•Q YQT Lt,r... �w mta� •von v marnw ml I w / ` Ra:41w4 M Lali� SMLL talfdMrf Ya M Ve471 alY -ice �ai.�f . a -k: �i+:'. I.S Y ?. /!ri ��1 �. �� �• i ✓r 1 � / • \-�, _ - _ ��. 1 _ _ _ � � ♦4.1`I�A /,• �, : ^ s 'e' ' \ y�r I ' s. mwlalw m m9wsms Puwsl Nm � .Nw•QNwas `•,.. � `_ �' � �-a.�c _ ad; ,P.�•.�. � ,�\ r wu oamlP mmmlc>, mvWP raw 1 - - , •c•`o''' ` y �:'vs�imwia s••°Y Qa••'om : iw•r<r'r'� Q.d emu¢ � �QI� 1 l� / s>g �'v��c a � � �j� `\ � /' M1 r� •��" : ., /.' , ruola crc ' )` ,x%11 : �s, ` r. wvPls rm mua v wr mnlrP. ronn. nwn. Nus. rmwPwx �- c�.�•' .y c IY :..+},' \l: r ` • j •�, n: I rt:::.°O1LO.w�mLNm re®I Ix� 1®m�t rlmr M ��`P�w.. i; j ".ti �.. �. * � D � r ♦• � � Q;' irr r rb c I • `.W �. � a M wlm.nw wu Qr, um nya w mNani rPS M ornww•rt o��t.. l::\ � %rl I^•�r`� ,/ .y. • _ �' ' .. � w•.T Nr^4n m Nl um R1m TILL fax¢ RNO a• M [IRR NQ w • � .. %x � a'f . L ` / •. a u leom®. w u PNmnu xP.m. w �x1C. Pu Imr ¢ amw F4 `,, tlN )`. / ' �\ . w rin R.a M rammcrw w.14 NYIPaaR ra OR rmw m mmrR -� ? % d{^ f' `.'-� �. ,• i j..;, / - - . r. ;••... __ •. m o<m.lnn M [slvl v mrP¢ Nwo m s xwulm ml a wu ®. �C '�•`_ `,vim � � •;:.Q . , .� . I it M4a ,y •� /!f � .. Ij I-a mmww���� �PPi6Q¢;•MMmVlr •Q a . � . / i 'P'u,t' biB c 9r1vQyR n9 6w1Pi C K . n11] 6 m1fl` IG m ', n,` . / �` 1 J�-4 ._ • ' ' -' \ ` \ • % �/ / ` ,f ` ` . p / / / ® 1 I aL w M m N ocm•¢vQllQPm, n lsPc Cmlrw w u R w. r ¢w•sv. w rQm a® t wYm t a �IPQmI + M ra wmmRm CnQ I O /u uQlm m mla. 0 9 ' , Rc • aTaP • ;' L / /".�1rr' ♦1 • � i � ,��I•, 11 ire � Yu rwn�• lol aw•a�'•ol �� mnm uas v REUKU.�- , •4. ` ,�! !�' .� \•Y�`..` - / I � \ � _�, nM�� wmr•¢ v r•ramm w Qo m ¢YS.i Immll o¢vn �. r .v 1 . .:'' ^ t \ 4 }.QR • II ♦ &/ 'F" w a em°0ws m nml oou4°°mnml • Mr°• ¢la uuGOni°�p1v M m1gL ?era:,• I n -; x e}�. m T..;-•': _' .._...... -- : G - ;'r/ P}L,: -_ _ :- �a.tlw OCT 2 7 ZO08 _ _ _ -' /.-I_. _ _ 1.'• 1 .t'`J• • y�� - _ n, -r• _ / • -. - �... - . >- ` _- naP nl rnymlrr tesam NNRS a.xvR wmums acQ.ta um u ®n I� isF L Fv iFr Crs awu w nms mNNP xnv.a wyn sNV mo sow r1- Z � y� ` RMMn_ +n N.YK ROI wMCR9 nl IwRn w M aRT1 rPJ r'R lTa! • W' t. —'�!. qT•"::..r \`. �'O I '4 �'``: Mliv ^MI.O. Ranl^rw) wW ml. 0:dx vT @•Wn Ull4rw• simma sParymn i t - - w»K h�1r m IB>Wr i�s+F � v,�I; �''� `..... I .'ti.6� \ .. � . "• n � wln nn wwurtP w raw=ien. wunn srnmi .em w mlan Ip u "!� '�- _ Ibe . \`... 1 �0�0'm�4y •��� err ¢ artmmm mmnry caara+lw. Lvr.n M aloN¢+ Nlxa4m. - ' 1 �/` 9` � ,�..,� - mQt ®rs WQQ w�RM MNi Yw fJx1 n ra ,r¢• J - X11 r \ / ` : / +N :: •\,L � ' �. n.usmm w x4txmcn +rnmR. s ramp w as 9Y44 ¢ immQa w • F ALV p T I •�•. _ �,� -." a uo�111•a w IawrQ F elea•R r,r{L. Qa:•¢ maPa w xasl[ a i v . y„ i-L :�. -I `"•- .: 'P ... r w ra Pss•a�,n a M mll.a -ml UBMITTAL .i -�' -- -- ��. = I,.. .�pxoQ`tw�iu N M°AO�wasl v ..�• R.Ir¢ m.PQ n vslc CTOBER 27. 2008 T•. II Rtywi mOPIrIM aI.1Yi DEMOLITION Lrlm .nwrl -E - - _ _A_._ .. -- - _ ® 1¢yP¢rorocR is•¢ s'oa'.I _"f _- - ' �-- J - _ 1 - _ -_. ® .VIw4 LrmP I AND .L_ i _ - - REMOVAL PLAN I I I , j I _ I_ _. ..... ._, _ _ .. _. ♦/nr ....... ... mlmi vnm Lase I I • {.. tii it �� , _' _ .. ._. ..- _• -_. - —.. - -_ °�..r P[IrP9t/I�Q: � qPw NRx.Q ti4� I i _ I • .•- _ _ _ __. _ _ ¢wx i4 fIRJLNR PRPRCIY9 ' • t I J_- - _� ��- tea �L-- ��I• _ -- _- •--- � - - - - -- � _ �.� slomml ®rlm rclQ • Ty ' io ---------- Parking Requirements (Hotel & Office) Method Parking Inventory City of Edina 768 Phase X lsting Demolition Remaining ,Full Office Space based an 146,S06 sq. ft. of offices are Total Aloft Hotel 626 77 549 106 655 io ---------- Parking Requirements (Hotel & Office) Method Tote! City of Edina 768 ULI Shared• 617 • UU Shared based on the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking 2nd Edition City of Edina Parking Requirements based an M.D.D. 6 Zoning ,Full Office Space based an 146,S06 sq. ft. of offices are top -T N '20' ee V % > narr PAR G Lun Pk� LNE -e T v 4 19,'1 73 SF A '15' SF 1< % 171 F,,,E ��F CE 112,1' N -A I-, - ^, 4 1$,41}4 7 STORT SPACE Q., SF 41 ... J --------------------- --------------- L Ll I I i YL T7TH STREET � liidtlG ICrt vlrr Nwmn I� mK Patr ao) _ - -�+^� ���� -- - - - - -7 F-- ------- --- • L_____f ____ .`.......,�.� ni ___''._ - A IK gal l TZO) MAR ¢IIrP I� R • runes o. w xmaae � w.,.l.rs,ur =�� —_ ®:Q'. __ �� ``• ramcn+ cm mK Om v.?I I I � ® %'� � mm¢u rww pa mK[Mn o.0 k� l"Y '1 I - IMkt am and Azad" km avww.T ooamow•lon Pwa•¢ wowalmo wwaw Nu rurw•vuK ru Wawu a M nwmrm, Nu rnortcT ova „""'�"'� wlmus N.as _ •••'"'u"�A `� mw'r- r �� � T6 M iPm•Eq+ Nwl T[aIr W wasPawa w M raM www m M nNr v mamasw. M [Prmacrml �•mia �[ Komi saw ; \ t•.• �., / � D T7 was ®[rar•Tw ¢a ') • . Nov1 \. ••r � 'yl �..,i . •• :' / • _.—. n mtcx cave raw® s•w+or [na Cw,r n •r>alor.v ww M [Nova n.wMn e, mwsm+•mr arww Pave.,ara .ova M. P.wml' LONG Nlnwl +. OCT 1 7 1000 A I _ _'\ � \ �•' /' , \1'/.' y'. t rmrso vivre mlwmaan ¢wTe moms I r \ \j \\ �• c wasm I I S 1 Oi pm•u laP r nml rale¢T[ LP•ww gATNPnLn q O . ®A 0qR¢ ww Tnr slm Parama,mrr. ¢v2 our rem eeaorw rvl rwPM w.w.¢ O• •[r PAT !• m[ wm Ta.rt Z. rw (/1 cwn v S.U,M TRL•wS 11e FM W'M uwre wawuw valx O T Q nNIxB. P Emloac all W • waM •.Rmue. lm v M. swmrw ru¢ mW OR11P1 wnM W[M SOLrI•U P[111m[.r[� mm K HST W MI) a )r vveerJmlTS .(rII ) xrmcw Pamm ¢m rm <P.aL (m mK ww M.) © )Cp6sL¢ m[eau ifQ mK OUT Q a nlewav raJOVn e r u Oa OOII POL paro To ¢aT cLe) Of.V1er+[ 9MR B0.Wm walaLLm POI wArncnlMea' ®[vea+wla +wc a u• -r m. rM a r -.• va, TM c r -v a ® 0.,A- {¢L aeOarril N•rq WTALU qmC P1Ym1a rl ® N6 Nwwarm wma Tin ® IT Oew WT DEL mK p T CLU) wvr la�Tm -om aw .no aT+tn mm¢¢ szw T 1s0 MIDI+ ® a+oP w+ ww aTV sm N07E4 ALOFT EDINA HOTEL SjIF AN➢ PAVING I. rmm•crw PNLL v •epwlCllw4 RPn rP mrOR N,Lwq wwuws [mvc+w ww[ mJrrala[ mn•, wT u[ww x nr+cL/Rww(a R.n rw•riav�iu[PTIV umn www¢ OM1 a,w [wtl w[aePw O amr Nwv �� ® F'f L Prt wlowvw r¢ mTOal,vs m ni r•¢ v ave m [aa v r•wt yarn mMaw¢ nom •It wwww • runes o. w xmaae � w.,.l.rs,ur wuvma rrt anva"¢o ro sa. mTPa r•v v K soalnuc s .catma[ Pew .m • vrr .wow wwL w¢ gwmia Pw wLlm � Om \ _ __ -'1 ��•'�i!i c�� rte, Raw • All .wPr,e we ¢w!m NW TR[+ M Tsrw nwwms ¢, rww n M — .� F a nwsm mover uwnw al a mNOn OA M Pa Iwa IO.ww wl ¢ NNr ww M wwwq Rover aw oPO"e eauvm u¢ rau ro,emn n k� l"Y '1 a minrcrw swa ¢rta n • R.q rw o%nwvw u[cvs•[ wra IMkt am and Azad" km r. [wwrmT v+,u cwrPyr wmAtT ao+[wP•c•[ w+ ra .0 ovum ro P•wwrl ooamow•lon Pwa•¢ wowalmo wwaw Nu rurw•vuK ru Wawu a M nwmrm, Nu rnortcT ova „""'�"'� ww nxs rm woven L M,wiw V ea¢ Rrn w wn w ,owweusw n ouo[ w,!¢er NvaNas wan rm mveNS _ •••'"'u"�A `� mw'r- wwuP+ en -Prt wwwL Rm,mvr - TgnT t Oar•em IIOY M rrt¢Im woven owal¢ �� � T6 M iPm•Eq+ Nwl T[aIr W wasPawa w M raM www m M nNr v mamasw. M [Prmacrml �•mia �[ Komi aa— rw�i efmpaxe[a ¢rQw M Rww aM :emaiurw � D T7 ow.%�. lmOOa¢�nuse°'a¢ 0 u, na�ranm•nw Naa wrowa wmw eww nova rNeaTe n•TIAe] n UmOw r[aT¢O V Mw9wr. ILM nnm•cml w� • ¢q M m¢ v rO [Lnwa •wxwT ¢aorr wm r.a 1 \LW! RE Wa Cw,r n •r>alor.v ww M [Nova n.wMn e, mwsm+•mr arww Pave.,ara .ova M. P.wml' LONG Nlnwl +. OCT 1 7 1000 A I I S 1 Oi pm•u laP r nml rale¢T[ LP•ww gATNPnLn q O . ®A 0qR¢ ww Tnr slm Parama,mrr. ¢v2 our rem eeaorw rvl rwPM w.w.¢ O• •[r PAT !• m[ wm Ta.rt Z. rw (/1 cwn v S.U,M TRL•wS 11e FM W'M uwre wawuw valx O T Q nNIxB. P Emloac all W • waM •.Rmue. lm v M. swmrw ru¢ mW OR11P1 wnM W[M SOLrI•U P[111m[.r[� mm K HST W MI) a )r vveerJmlTS .(rII ) xrmcw Pamm ¢m rm <P.aL (m mK ww M.) © )Cp6sL¢ m[eau ifQ mK OUT Q a nlewav raJOVn e r u Oa OOII POL paro To ¢aT cLe) Of.V1er+[ 9MR B0.Wm walaLLm POI wArncnlMea' ®[vea+wla +wc a u• -r m. rM a r -.• va, TM c r -v a ® 0.,A- {¢L aeOarril N•rq WTALU qmC P1Ym1a rl ® N6 Nwwarm wma Tin ® IT Oew WT DEL mK p T CLU) wvr la�Tm -om aw .no aT+tn mm¢¢ szw T 1s0 MIDI+ ® a+oP w+ ww aTV sm N07E4 ALOFT EDINA HOTEL SjIF AN➢ PAVING I. rmm•crw PNLL v •epwlCllw4 RPn rP mrOR N,Lwq wwuws [mvc+w ww[ mJrrala[ mn•, wT u[ww x nr+cL/Rww(a R.n rw•riav�iu[PTIV umn www¢ OM1 a,w [wtl w[aePw O amr Nwv �� ® F'f L Prt wlowvw r¢ mTOal,vs m ni r•¢ v ave m [aa v r•wt yarn mMaw¢ nom •It wwww • runes o. w xmaae � w.,.l.rs,ur wuvma rrt anva"¢o ro sa. mTPa r•v v K soalnuc s .catma[ Pew .m • vrr .wow wwL w¢ gwmia Pw wLlm � Om Mortens�on- Raw • All .wPr,e we ¢w!m NW TR[+ M Tsrw nwwms ¢, rww n M — .� F a nwsm mover uwnw al a mNOn OA M Pa Iwa IO.ww wl ¢ NNr ww M wwwq Rover aw oPO"e eauvm u¢ rau ro,emn n k� l"Y '1 a minrcrw swa ¢rta n • R.q rw o%nwvw u[cvs•[ wra IMkt am and Azad" km r. [wwrmT v+,u cwrPyr wmAtT ao+[wP•c•[ w+ ra .0 ovum ro P•wwrl ooamow•lon Pwa•¢ wowalmo wwaw Nu rurw•vuK ru Wawu a M nwmrm, Nu rnortcT ova „""'�"'� ww nxs rm woven L M,wiw V ea¢ Rrn w wn w ,owweusw n ouo[ w,!¢er NvaNas wan rm mveNS _ •••'"'u"�A `� mw'r- wwuP+ en -Prt wwwL Rm,mvr - TgnT t Oar•em IIOY M rrt¢Im woven owal¢ �� � T6 M iPm•Eq+ Nwl T[aIr W wasPawa w M raM www m M nNr v mamasw. M [Prmacrml �•mia �[ Komi aa— rw�i efmpaxe[a ¢rQw M Rww aM :emaiurw � D T7 ow.%�. lmOOa¢�nuse°'a¢ 0 u, na�ranm•nw Naa wrowa wmw eww nova rNeaTe n•TIAe] n UmOw r[aT¢O V Mw9wr. ILM nnm•cml w� • ¢q M m¢ v rO [Lnwa •wxwT ¢aorr wm r.a 1 \LW! RE Wa Cw,r n •r>alor.v ww M [Nova n.wMn e, mwsm+•mr arww Pave.,ara .ova M. P.wml' LONG Nlnwl +. OCT 1 7 1000 A MOlmww+ m Rpnewpl wT T m ow•¢o owrw avwwmw n M mlmwTOa xa Narn(mamn m TNRw n m ammlw Twat ro m � . owwa IL wl NnNwe:sm�IenlmRR M wo urow mr. S 4 law[ P•vn answa P•¢wn wwwu Mi,°wu o mnvmmf°mm eun rn++�ev uwaif w w ammw¢ sawao •+[ FINAL rt¢wry wr nworma w Twwl mw M vwua w iPrmw m•mc DEVFIOPMENT cv,rwd w¢r, w x[w swn wra a awnq+io rr[rrere qan rw w PLAN Sl18MITTAL Mw�ia� � au¢ •q ulw OCTOBER 27, 2008 IL iTIR•f:+w NYL Pn4nL w ®L •love rw on. n•rt. rw q• nwowos a+ ova me¢ rm nwula TJe'JIVOw o atowm SITE AND PAVING PLAN pspmp � �1tww �i loom m ,ai..a mc�.wr mDm mn ram 4ww ewl rONGRETE PAVER n• Iran .m�.r`� .Dl PLAN SU9MITTAL ®w i w rroonrn ®mow OCTOBER 27, ZOOS • mrw A• -w mm® rcaaa GENERAL n+IN varr + 8J1iD AND DETAILS wrwmr mMenD w.... wrr!w su rs PERMEABLE PAVER �+m n �waa uoty ia.rr+`um�m rDV�iw wso wamv WITH GRANULAR TRENCH_ w• � m�urta _;,E it -rrtm�a iwo®1 s�anm n ®ma.ea uam a aaa ruu a mwa+m m m+aNUw um m POROUS PAMEMFNT WITH GRANULAR TRENCH .wD, Dae saNDSwrwNel Dm.ow w+w ew w ms. as sui �ewmimv nrn LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT �f • °r"'a°" m�a° �i vwmi.�m®ra sW HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT . Iss• n[m�DY® amoral % •, _ Imsn�!owasamw ®Dm xsnr !. w ro, va +rt assn mm rYnsrw ,ao�oom wamrrm [mama uasrnD rmw vimomweo wr�v� .�a� ,u� w rcai +aw m ruv+rnt a w r aww v ®rrswc UNOERCRbUND INnLTRATIDN STRUCTURE nas cnoY elcssa+oeiw na main +e '®s�0"m1°°°"'w'Y1L +a�awwrTDa.msrr me uaD lrnvm vscraowrY rmnsnneaDlawamx maxxrouwmnwsDeav+asm'ramvsaenon + v+s au.!� sm Gnx Nm UDD IOAW IIQm ammsssm! mlremFN SC-740 TYPICAL SECTION • D' Y ss us cw c o J oaa Nm m+r+m BOULEVARD DETAIL ALOFT EDINA HOTEL mN. WW � I ® ff IDN DI A NPrDY r mDAIC ww • SEGDOIi �'�• Mortens�on ret • _ a nm I �;av cowl rw®+w rao sw _ �m�Qg„y r-r ua auu 1�l OIw mow Grw !Pw9�1 a M f.1lm Dx Al Q ` ` —'� moo ru o WuD Rn v moan orm rro onar � F�,AI"wa+ry ' rr msNDw arc roR �. mmucm� m sm r • �wvwr¢ orm conwrw s �.uwosvru u wmmma n r a am s a n a r� wr e .s•t auscD n n + o aa wr u r a sNIsr �asarn• . s�a �aoR� u nrra a's •eDm Il ¢ sm�a w DrNNrD �mm. w a pusn mm rsa naw m U �Ir maersrDmmw .a N m u n n • 10 F NSH r M." '� Rax cm� PLAN SU9MITTAL OCTOBER 27, ZOOS GENERAL n+IN varr NOTES 8J1iD AND DETAILS r o!wosm aoarar nnD r.Dt �� Imc rIWP r91 ®11RIm1m [wnrwMl `ptwrr' DYetmo CROSS n u mow Rr,x11n R] lwwrdD[ RN vwun rwmi rrtw i w mi assn nwD mom w w arrDmsA.v ®Ili INFILTRATION BASIN CZ•0 C4,_ CITY OF EDINA \'rANDARD PLATFS 0.•R x0 OFSWA.Or .0- A .-j A -1 KA1 NEW OF OIAGRIAL RAMP FLAN VIEW OF PERFEKCPC RAID s os'c°Lw1R,w � c 7 RA OOZE N.cT �InW rl.rn. e,•c® 's/°- eOees^Pl Ism:J 'V ra ertII .•u 0_0 b 'V 4C1 A -A = J/c s� -ten• Irm.1 OUYE SPACING msn.T, xuR Q rt•A[. sec, (. nxc eaa•lmes w YY 0,0 n.rT,. - O.W rt�/rr. a6q' n,CRYC�iroxS� r (s• a1.6. oW n,pr. aavF : -v © a -r I.. one A o.W rc/rr. sePc ­r I: an. A .01 n /Fr. Sta°rl r -r p• nem . 0. W n./n. —1 FIFVAR OF RAMP 1,MW Y 1�I •�R[•�a. vuia •smei�1[ :.0 v Rcwiwnruw w1r�Rr amsmr� n®or�, wo a1,EA p,n as rsoro.lm oR, 1xLU M.RWL ••R�ro M su ©lu •u�a erma.ns ro ::Mwn.rt"Aw-m' ei r�sW'�wr A•w r�°'M R•YP. • wmn. n.•r r r . L•1raWc WE Wi lwaioaua A •x sr• �i �sW.x Au.s um .e• uxma Farm, r1cv. nc .�s,a•x omsvlc sx•u 0 °,a artc,.az :.awn e.w riaa rwmnlcs/ mNCAnn owL x¢• rm1 na rROn r.¢ rr orre. a wa ® •D• ACaaRO mnCARp — MCA Y . r P Mx.. __ V ,.— •x0 C Cnrxn M — _,x v nR aae AAw. _ r P• R. r c a •' u ,m,x I,m.J rAYxc•,m Dort •1[• s.MU an W s, Msu1.• w,x ,1c ODC. 11 ' G LOF. I.— pug �:rnm—wn•�L AR• 9IYRl H�OMxnma �. niot o.m (A•r M �ipL�O.I W(A M wi:mlr ^iWu rs. •M..,F• m L onr errs, G A r Ait e>lrsnYC.w. Y -P ALLO.m 1. ­3 w n24A _ P.nLC,S PEDESTRIAN CURE! RAMP FOR THE HANDICAPPED — ul¢nlc r.Wc R ras w<sw Erreuom,l �uWu Learna —D- mew• Ro,rw a' o- r.ewc Nr,RY:M 9 .CSx0191L rW IRMOV4 V NL [.09M a .•nmis reuo.WO rnrA aR s•®1r•nox ALOFT EDINA HOTEL I ®Ft .EMOV4 rr p�aNL,; x .16101 OF W —TEL. ,I A,YO. =r•o YPm �_m Mortennonn' IF i� /.na.`n��r w IOmleyHam Imd Aasadal�, Nc. INLET TION . SEDIMENT FILTER SACK �rac ti GO RECEIVEO OCT 2 7 2000 r FINAL 7YPICAL CROSS DEVELOPMENT tlATCHING MARKINGS PLAN SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 27, 2008 C01C OIW a ILROI GENERAL NOTES q AND Q•r DETAILS x•.xs P•vnml, .ISS•¢ I*ITJ r 1pp,r eW. tlANDICAP PARKING DETAIL 6umrr ikrmr. MR 1101 'c j �P i �d �w J II i llag , _ _ _ — I 1 c rn: :, t ��J GRADING NOTES I xtrz• rB M 9rt n.x rw B�.•rzB worts ! •u a Itvrlws .Bt iB a,rt• noawr wxts Pna•xs xortP SPBI t t..P� a qtr tW�pwRr,�xroM • cCrQx•l Oj,1v+tIP mdW 10 VwNMO 1.C:1 IG m 0 41w0[ RSa01 %[ rW •OC•xxc up m0rtC1 [x91xP: V1x11q w0 M 1`¢vw dxvc tWlwuC[1Y IK VIwRS r s,000rni. °T. if0x.r'•vl ul e a io�ixsri:c wlPr. e wis Q utuBns vlB•u w xduB olq a s °ens, w 0 Wmc rrtBwrutl�0,sr�r Wr. i OrP®o5 Cw Ml 9N1t1x D•x0 e 901•x.r9 •x[ rx94o WwG •9xutr. IS, Ga�R 91Be•4 w •CO¢0•rt d a CICV•IxM 10 B[ COx0.trzD wWl i. 10 mM C91 w•� Sx wCrl9wt rg9x5t ww•¢ B, Wei, RO• ix wvtYfllf art•] r0 4• W [•5Wc Ww•0'. vxtR W g(ti w06w10. I wrs a caysixucrol. ]�SxOBx 0x M RYO 0.W. R 9!B<Ci IV • I r•IC 12 y WWI 5 u¢ rrs B[ 4[BIO w P•PI0 •1! Bq•eM0 •rR•] •�H iP BE 4mFD 1! PQ �w•CiW Sx4! xx1xOC w M Cww•[r rx¢RY1r 10 OT50BKi M wgL[�•L O� a M Mu6. 1•.�[O,nwCiW rs iRSwfr9B1L rW M Otslw rlOro.rE.uvr%iolt s�a.swP¢z •�dvrtnolPA USrl awslw.vraw o ar•rz. wm M IST—w m­-A-.- -' . M SxN gLw[[x A- x0 •C5e 5- tw C 0[90115) iB w5141 5•D 11pS nvxc mm•crw 91.0 xvtx ro M 4 .BU•rtclln a w•xs rw ce•tr , — [ vw ww OvOT9W5 R [vi Pews M11 q.�r B�.w� Ydr. •iru wmxus cwsrw9 B1nmc rolnm•PO.s r`. ,�ilei•�urtuidw�as u rciw.•i s±1•u0PS1: Y0 i0K �Ox M S1b1C1�I�•Tp 0C 4•v2 .0 rwwB. uorio«�rnw�sw�•m�m m w n. or°Yrrlwxc o¢Mx u•rrnw 1s uxsui+nc uro xusr e< �IPSta sui.wt u+rtwu 91w! uwYP.tB. wB B•mum •xB cwP•crtP +s anm n M aorto•c..rz Imrt:sgnuvt. 16+1! dl w r•C SLOtS 9dL Bf YI W MrIIA urues axal� wvn iw 91w! •u¢IC ro x.c mars B con]i1n1s •s w1ucP w M mau 1..nr.s Iw s>acnWr�:>R ���l¢.ssm.rtB .rx mtWw.crw w,u w! xro/W a, cusl.lc vmgi •s I ra¢svw ro •ssua • 91am xr um mvrBlu9ls w'nt. :'.��w�nwnlcs rWw•u�x +r°p9w•niixo •w� •••v !i�•�1 RmK • w�049 V WrW'�sz w�i eats vat I�"ov s�P°'u� !•i1w rcaxc is 'im�sm.ic rm s wm a�casl'"wcwiB cs+11Ac. ... _ . -- - LEUM $-- --- �.— rBwostc lew tawraw ALOFT EDINA HOTEL emu. w I ®Ft Mortenson \� dlld Assodetes, Na — is ��� A�,,� '4 p� (• i OCT 2 y M FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL ICTOBER 27, 2008 GRADING PLAN USA=. — e.rB.r �t'rBw C5.0 8 I r avc ism � ._ . .... fira•L 4 e]¢m • ""� "min i RSa� NolkyµD"t ROAD DRAINAGE NOTES .. - _ ww° s :oi .wa�•rt�C`oartn m A. +u wns�. m a+vs um.c : wr' . , . ua+ mron� +Ennis •c ®r nc ro - ] WST•O A, u16in La65 Sx•u 4 D6 ('CxSaaKaW •w +Ga imL".c s�vC w+]5 w •aplN.`�1. Dau ImE 9��11 �GUD« rxC R.x ' -' Drx[a •aaut•BL Wrt«+ 5 S9COnUMN4 W. 77TH STREET + EE 6[xW :i ME `mrt- .EnU Y•r S. t DC ¢ s5 m aDmE —11 a. �.c•TM +rtD u•meu sx•u sE 11 wrwcrt a�aE Lmrtss or�¢a «x °rEro °rtD. - C Llvra.E 90C Q MX02S 1. WEETE W«•4 AT-° S E ro S - CCrtO •xD aCV•«ED •S xF[DCD..xD C. LnLUEXi CnOV O[4rtuwC gn54a�C nR5 CD SE RE•xCD W r ED - AAMSmo JCLLwxE RR rtp PI NDSt ar •rm 0EBM5 (t C Sro«E�dl mus«C R W a0:. S.1ETA, Sm.G SrauCrwE4 ro aN•« eE i°°rt wm:c�smucnw n orr- TE aPET -1, �a�sm+nx ra aEE•.m «sic �- rt«•c r ET ew`Ot�Em -nwc mon«.ar w RI�w a ro •� I �w uo r oaort sau +ow 5. slwL .ivE urEraac smrcnrrts i�v - ! c. acsu �x.r�uLnw.0 ec c `:ccBCUV.aAT so r— z .•mr.wr. \ • , ( . ' / \ Q AN+n°�DSS +rm �eLO i m-m1 1pc�o«°v +•clwS 1 «+• n 9E rrc r 4EA PAP—S « PAM .i s + u5�'L«� �`mu R ff'iaiLC'fY�i / • . Y \ ' c:r�OES. rs r• �a.EErs.m.ucs crosni . —TTEx CW L+1CSr mna° Q N.SaDCILa2 roP ¢[v+naLS Sw1p Ma[ \ ` ��', ° mE uxJp�E �SruLp•xD SrN4 •xo A[ •wn°or+R. —EAAE al SxyE t us]•=.Ermc au5uc Ea.s sr •s Eass+ay. " ^� °' `. � � \ � \ ` :' is � •. \ -. D°rnnruiJLr. ° +�E.'C, •,. \; ., . /', L ( '� WEmuvawa m+•DSUD fo®u[ ' PAT `I] LfJIT L®F O ¢SDS ' v i R'.\`• 1141 1, �6 IGEND •m,— aADaoSm SEOIb SEA J , \ 0 0 —>— MIATC SEam SEA /," i m ( +1.__ __ ♦'� >..:' i -•;: �Ei.• /;' °: ____ -__. mLSiwu:nw wrs LATE ALOFT EDINA HOTEL - Eu« ua I®f-t- WHIN Ml/ ort ®n Blld A40o3IB9, a1C 70 >> 9 R,�n OCT 2 7 2008 j W. 77TH STREET jNDPW'ANOALE 80131 I , �•ro �.w r -as• ¢ - - — — — — — — — — -Ir — r -art wva ri Ze ALOFT EDINA HOTEL GENERAL TER AND SEWER 1.1111111 NOTES i. 4[ £unl•R♦ S[¢R 1Y6'+ 914E ¢ PK Sw ][. i M [w¢•[!w 9r•[L m15P61Ci W,xR 5[PCP aat[n4£ ®I ®f� :Pa tnRx4.� �^[£ .rw Da[sn[ ..rtA ,rw rwr 9.Dwr w MII lrr[ mr04rDx a��c7' 7 rt¢¢ssxw u• �4s. [aw[x> uaowcP.. Sx ;`r�� a 41w rrC¢SSU♦ ! • rmox Dr w x9r[u COOrL6 w [ ar0 [DrP1Lrt w •[TDNwR e ra m.i. ¢ ; wcrzr�nmv � u[xn ■ ® -a - . ..- ..�� ppOt�xrS"`.•xm01.a�. dr¢Dw[u`'"ulls) a M [w+1 rx•! !�[ c9rm.cr pscw[xrs ,.n Julcycuw4 .¢xcr ersSArxrms .e[ xar w am[v[n!, ��'. eD6 :""¢ "• m[w 4s wuruD.m Blur. spurs gum u6 Mortenssoon � .�� n G 'sci.. "t ''"" (:� nrt1m sunsun 1wrtP4s .1 sc �ymm [ el£1D ^^��'��'"�°°!! ��^^^���� � . iiv�,:ww[ n4P[P. rvur srw�m rsuaD Nara R � "s� a ro r�m�'°,£ nar xI" w rr•5 R•e£ tw pr0.Prr[MrwS Ww, nM dMw d 1M P6[µw Dw[9 NEM@5 n Orn rw VQ, a4a xpl ¢ xqp Id[ xpt San9,ct A�vR ¢� NL ¢ OCx6♦ �C [OrA�Dre�R'S rROr w•u ¢ r¢0.•Qp P rw Iw[ M 5x D BPW4[ ¢ •r•l•B[[ Iw DS[ PwOP 1p ] me1.15POL£ BUn Y9D W wr w ert e tyM1 •rri slOd w•w m[xOns [DC•1[p [x1D[P •e[•5 rD � ... r.. �•e...�. �.• :WK P•wrD 5x4[ ¢ ma[6[1 B•p66[[D w •R A— ra SPCQr.noR uw >FlSOC¢x4 ,umoerr M [5[xl Mal ra [w11.•Cl PD[rreOrrs ,M M xP••SOCUw4 •Q16r�Or6rafn5 •Q pr w •p6o61ri. M x06 St9xONl 4> [¢s£w♦ wSPC[Dw5 um/w ¢Pm[•no9 4swm 0♦ ,ws9 —D •arnx5 .rm/w Dwr. smla cnw.r<s P or[ -AL m°U1w[°MClor aw t •wrar,s>n euRnelc Psrsus9a .rm _ ••^ cam. es- iP sxw•.n[� rw 4s x.rW4£ •x0 .RwPrte•e¢5 9r4a ¢ sP+mswiD"cor A­ 11 nc'wlsx°v Mp1. aKei% •w"OPD.iD •Rep`OPi [ssw[DS"io��w•¢rm[' Swx.W ¢[x 10 1 j .M µ 1 (�� x0eiwr4 ¢.u•rnx wLLa BC [D e[n¢[n w•lm x•rs doer w•wA [ualuo 5[r01£ uw Im[F RAw 1M5 ¢ •c AA- > , mn•rz s•wtur uew sv m�ucrmr a,u , urtsr mmr v M uvoer wAma CID[ lu ucl i e°OCmii " 0C1 272008 - samux+ suul4�.. C n irmii o - ,w•rrni .c uric rD�iraiNO" ¢D9¢s1[xrs v M rtonea> Pw surttrmrs v t¢ ®• Ox9w d wr¢IC rA— nMt£ ' i [[11W 0105988 wp1 M r•lpel•x w5141•nw swT` e' •BM ♦ 0. ra CMm[ 40rw1 d r•m sw9 9uMLl a rm�1s¢wcvim ualc w[.xnn WORD[ v�1 •Slx D -]u1. 9nn 7s w659r6 ParD) w[ wM i1Lm[ .srowc sa9[T mrs Asa o-]ra. FINAL DEVELOPMENT •l S— saw wDm cs wa ..rD¢aw R xd 'r .epu PLAN SUBMITTAL U71LITY PLAN i lEGM m.•r— 95e6Br, PRDRV� swrur u[w • PPOPOtm r•6R u,w []a9D s4wxrr aru [9srrc r•rw x,w C7.D ALOFT EDINA HOTEL GENERAL TER AND SEWER 1.1111111 NOTES i. 4[ £unl•R♦ S[¢R 1Y6'+ 914E ¢ PK Sw ][. i M [w¢•[!w 9r•[L m15P61Ci W,xR 5[PCP aat[n4£ ®I ®f� :Pa tnRx4.� �^[£ .rw Da[sn[ ..rtA ,rw rwr 9.Dwr w MII lrr[ mr04rDx a��c7' 7 rt¢¢ssxw u• �4s. [aw[x> uaowcP.. Sx ;`r�� a 41w rrC¢SSU♦ ! • rmox Dr w x9r[u COOrL6 w [ ar0 [DrP1Lrt w •[TDNwR e ra m.i. ¢ ; wcrzr�nmv � u[xn ■ ® -a - . ..- ..�� ppOt�xrS"`.•xm01.a�. dr¢Dw[u`'"ulls) a M [w+1 rx•! !�[ c9rm.cr pscw[xrs ,.n Julcycuw4 .¢xcr ersSArxrms .e[ xar w am[v[n!, ��'. eD6 :""¢ "• m[w 4s wuruD.m Blur. spurs gum u6 Mortenssoon .mrisi �:rz. T� D[nx:uw[a+s sx�LL1 ¢slort 4v Dslw+erp .[sxt•uw Rxp n w . ua[ss 9rem pm[PP9. "t ''"" (:� D[—[ol �d wP[ mxls .xD cros we rcd..rAw59r4s nLI [ Darr Dus•a - ".1 s �!. • u¢e�o%� nw —G—m— :ro ui0 t[wv v w ro[s 0.rnrB u0 [K•6p � N M 0.u£ �ymm P"•.rums e•anw µw•� oYOMw°[rTM.°`PiGmsr n �ss1Dw`. ^^��'��'"�°°!! ��^^^���� � . iiv�,:ww[ n4P[P. rvur srw�m rsuaD Nara R � "s� a ro r�m�'°,£ nar xI" w rr•5 R•e£ tw pr0.Prr[MrwS Ww, nM dMw d 1M P6[µw Dw[9 NEM@5 n Orn rw VQ, a4a xpl ¢ xqp Id[ xpt San9,ct A�vR ¢� NL ¢ OCx6♦ �C [OrA�Dre�R'S rROr w•u ¢ r¢0.•Qp P rw Iw[ M 5x D BPW4[ ¢ •r•l•B[[ Iw DS[ PwOP 1p ] me1.15POL£ BUn Y9D W wr w ert e tyM1 •rri slOd w•w m[xOns [DC•1[p [x1D[P •e[•5 rD � ... r.. �•e...�. �.• :WK P•wrD 5x4[ ¢ ma[6[1 B•p66[[D w •R A— ra SPCQr.noR uw >FlSOC¢x4 ,umoerr M [5[xl Mal ra [w11.•Cl PD[rreOrrs ,M M xP••SOCUw4 •Q16r�Or6rafn5 •Q pr w •p6o61ri. M x06 St9xONl 4> [¢s£w♦ wSPC[Dw5 um/w ¢Pm[•no9 4swm 0♦ ,ws9 —D •arnx5 .rm/w Dwr. smla cnw.r<s P or[ -AL m°U1w[°MClor aw t •wrar,s>n euRnelc Psrsus9a .rm _ ••^ cam. es- iP sxw•.n[� rw 4s x.rW4£ •x0 .RwPrte•e¢5 9r4a ¢ sP+mswiD"cor A­ 11 nc'wlsx°v Mp1. aKei% •w"OPD.iD •Rep`OPi [ssw[DS"io��w•¢rm[' Swx.W ¢[x 10 1 j .M µ 1 (�� x0eiwr4 ¢.u•rnx wLLa BC [D e[n¢[n w•lm x•rs doer w•wA [ualuo 5[r01£ uw Im[F RAw 1M5 ¢ •c AA- > , mn•rz s•wtur uew sv m�ucrmr a,u , urtsr mmr v M uvoer wAma CID[ lu ucl r.+[rerr[ 9D.-m£ e•x u[ vow£ am re[ r,9[4 01 ¢rumor x[,£ t 4v nN uo sueruw ¢rw mrs¢uniw A1LLCC, 6 wM nCS Rw£ aro ra Cl 9Sp6•npn n¢ pia 0C1 272008 d c9[[6mc 9.[6Yarmrs w alas, M Dwm1 ua ¢dd[W 9141 ¢ Cwt41m Pww rD tax5¢eCUw. ia9.uv, ra xpsl sr¢rmrl 9cviurnr a.0 •m[ ♦. s7 n irmii o - ,w•rrni .c uric rD�iraiNO" ¢D9¢s1[xrs v M rtonea> Pw surttrmrs v t¢ ®• Ox9w d wr¢IC rA— nMt£ ' i [[11W 0105988 wp1 M r•lpel•x w5141•nw swT` e' •BM ♦ 0. ra CMm[ 40rw1 d r•m sw9 9uMLl a rm�1s¢wcvim ualc w[.xnn WORD[ v�1 •Slx D -]u1. 9nn 7s w659r6 ParD) w[ wM i1Lm[ .srowc sa9[T mrs Asa o-]ra. FINAL DEVELOPMENT •l S— saw wDm cs wa ..rD¢aw R xd 'r .epu PLAN SUBMITTAL �; ura awv sm�rz rte[ o"�iw[�..r�auur'� nrse•¢wD .sxr eus xo .sa c.c> w Dare o1gP0 P,rte x,ws ,x, rL,p -w r:wx[[nOr15 !D SPRrmm B. wD OQ pliD•[ xEP.• > w•PrzP r6 ¢[rNr i0 �e]r., ]Wl f9. OCTOBER 27. 2008 U71LITY PLAN i lEGM m.•r— 95e6Br, PRDRV� swrur u[w • PPOPOtm r•6R u,w []a9D s4wxrr aru [9srrc r•rw x,w C7.D NoRMpty�p,�E RDPD I - ..��•� 0 , J Ix I. ?, , J Z. z it • � � II i ^,` '� • � � ALOFT HOTEL S b4 9 ; I 7 STORY {„ �,• 'I� j„ •y�- FFE 826.0 , I k � ALOFT EDINA HOTEL I Iof- Mortenssoon OW Amod" ba RE%I O OCT 2 7 2008 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 27, 2008 SITE LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRICS PLAN k`EL�La".m A I ALOFT EDINA HOTEL Ivu.la 0 1 off MAE. Mortenson a.❑ RocrEffW FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMfTTAL OCTOBER 27, 2008 LANDSCAPE PLAN R6iJ�iJ . -. LI.0 W. 77TH STREET I ROAD N�MANOµE TM CT ' [mROml p,pR \ ,.a. pm'1 ;rte ' /�'"., p• \\`., ALOFT EDINA HOTEL Ivu.la 0 1 off MAE. Mortenson a.❑ RocrEffW FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMfTTAL OCTOBER 27, 2008 LANDSCAPE PLAN R6iJ�iJ . -. LI.0 PLANT SCHEDULE OVERSTORY TREES (rnw '] AT, B..0. .aA . rv¢Y.an «vsa]} wrAws Dcaa r_ -Bee � eee - u [er4n 4[ara. aKwtt05 rw nrtA•e9 HRM' au EBxp.r. 'Da]AN.C' -- T -ObB _- -e•e - nw eaa. 'wrvvrr cwp' Y -pee - - EVERGREEN TREES ORNAMENTAL TREE ® ]] m .mEOF w.B..0.L � r.r+a YYK vWM' s rA -te9 rrIn '- - Q rLuxw wf xu r x9m axKu eEs. w 4 wnx.xo rrt w'N W xx w c [wx w u smsvOE mABErl..m0a.Darrr Krtu .e. -N mEa , t _ - --_ _---.-__ SHRUBS ]]rY B s TcDsw¢+rro..wEu.sex mr+ s. nw Lm0• - Y.r [ var A n N rc RLL Era+wr •.gc . r ws L @4 •9aM rx ¢ Lro. �wA+ . K [w l.Tu[[m. N xar ia' - u Nw wttxr x ns wra m;IanYruxcLLrras nrs'y _ - PERENNIALS �. °a m r[ sv ¢a r. •• w. w • A r sc a v c a . xDs x+r - - BO owpCE [ sr ro r •sRN S [.r.Yps p+ m � s x• rrn mar [a. o sW• n }Ix - _ <•a•ErzD ­ ar. ]penwac s.¢s was uE N . r• I­ w Swr ¢• . - - Ir m'�' n• n�wr.p ems .ix >-.• aEaapm °xeLi wpaom w, macs pnEnv4 xprm. ]. r� w •u •w �.s w�imaro v[m <�vaa�� I _,E [ .• [W.rsc•R v!¢.S ..Waal .Yewa [a qY ®s .. Wsrw. •• srza m¢A now .0 vrvrrew elm xpi em¢}® B. v..Lmri .tt vrmsor stm mml �� a mDlvr•rz [vsr.p mom. x .ExrKw .xW ra•¢wurr .w maa4p eeEm,im. ra mr xpm 9 MNCau NOTES: ' 0..rrr lr00t wsT Q •C¢.rYAL .Mr Y]SIOM6 a .nvDOi ]eel e.a 1p r¢[OxxG M Si•rIMD Rw MD 4r.A5. BANAL 5D[ rA..l B•ODLL BAUEO t aUlallAP[D CQ•TAWEa STpCA BMIE RODT sipP[ sr �sc... sas •xp Barar o r, m.v rwrs ° w.rz. ra Al i mo�B w[WS cwacl�..axm�c r nc. r( +n ­- AS .Na ,o im e• M [xOx¢x } .tt r. ;crM 0.w sixl B/i x01 reYa w }. l 4r a rwasnre@p N.nK .elvl •s aa<Rp B. M B.Dau sa wliµymR � !�0 M 1 xa�OVC O�i.Ka ul 49a ]. s� . sRS u0 IDxW a rLYa rs .r a r rp r ta4 a s4Y.ss m a maam .w r]macm( ­�wD w¢iv.} +psl AS pE¢crza n ra rLwI.L KCC .tt R .] N[QSSw., wWp a. c p.[.. •r0 .$ B•ALr. (f Y4D} .. Yr� Nr w Vr05iY�p •. Sr[A 0.wi pW[[M1. lalV Kr. a•oYat ip ...r .. � a mDrpDDA. ..rte YT r(wr m M •ra• rr a M >m a •DVnt sa. v .vE rs .rwm4um..i M eaaret.. rrOr ura 0.w W�srYl 0.M]t m M R^ O M rwpa0 s0. 6CV.na A,­ A,­ .. M roo rn ¢ ra B•atET M —1 n.ra EP rs •r w w ra sr+Na errors pui [sEnr. 0.we M la iE9 xapD]r4 Arts ! i• •e0[[ ra r.1aaD a•pC Yl oaCD.AT e•Dfu .tt ra ..o63TA n DI(•rza. 450 YYO.( ILA r0 YfaL 0.•xrs Ym 410E rp Yru 0.Yrrs •rm •[( ewa.v •xD vES rADr M io• a m�ixwaoa..na ] � � •DDS. rn a ra BYL 4.rpa .0 r.ee °� a •rzv gawon• .Aa } !�u>sRt �aB.NLL .w M ). 0..4 Y¢w .ttw .! 1101/15 xpYVS 0..Q .ww .ir.r •! e �5ra m YrrLC 0..vn YO rAt M YmrO A•raL VHCS] YcaO .•rt•vl SDL YD9Nf6 R arzL[s9H. Vtu55 SDL WlrMd R CK[593L M r41M0� na1.rL muss ma E Sua xNrlar. m�Wrox¢ .B4wr.[ sPrmr arras. ra Rr •xD app. e+lt w ]¢¢ssw+. ANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS PlM]IWL IrPL PYCNYCgs (YWgUY Y9)TM DOES NOT APPLY q MASS gANIWp BUDS) •LL VuUES MC AS fOLL ONS: r_ rvm Ii2i2s tN.snxc w•¢ •Q• 0.Yri •Cp0a0rr4' 10 0.NrwL gl•LS AS •.WC•eQ. Y}OwG 6.9rLi. F_. _ Sr. P J6• a.MO 10.9. BO �.._ ..... � r Cw tapcl un].rc B•ax PLANING DETAIL FOR STEEP SLOPES AA so.o«c p x¢C (Kw.nw EOM a e• na rt+vn vmr s.srxr, sY® 0.•rrPl BID •AB SOL (ttwDrpr[. EppID ®1 read rWlafn Dua PLIWTING DETAIL FOR MASS PLANING BEDS ¢rrtau xprts VA 0 wr .rr[ xiw� o - i F. �� [r -.nl SYYEl x]wrpran vmrs pu• a rwrarAm �� r(,a°a aaA RMC �w� ur[a4 aWl rL]¢ Arms r.a r®w amr9 0.we. .via B.Cxrrtcwc Arr a[ iww lK r[ •e0H IxpMD w.a [t(v +nw.K PLANTING DEPTH DETAIL xarc YC xppT f[W rp mrra a my�yy� 0.+x19 9rYL npl ME-.' rEW E. Su09pxc Oar�wrzOa• �.AW^9r+L[ ¢ ]xi [uw Dmrx n�ir+wr.um r • rom�AOrw a° ¢.nr .r .M mas xro vw Twu �.x ¢. ¢.L +¢.[xr Yaw sn.0 eE gryvpE M YNV•N ¢.tt �araa .a. vea¢x4 w [ass rs a¢saa .• - tarr�•Rp M nAM .M SotnaYi x..[ r�narD ✓. w MCm 1D • DNM OI[.Rn �NSOrIm eMN praC}EB er M aor¢x_ ;. vuu Y4w B•Dr xp [LS w•n r w NB YDa ww e• ma ra nn1. W ! QI]iEa Q mpE R TYPE OF PLANT Drnw tl DEPa[ _ 6 wwr to eR.xL].gc ro w[a YIAa YDLw WE wLLN [a!E apwwa Aa[S Y r.r N • • _e CwxS.M aeelBS Y Br1 ]' -. - ¢pwM sxmes carts _ _ rcm�.v[s rYms r w - awaAW.rzn MLS 1r a.am tD4 a x¢L MULCH PLACEMENT DETAIL ALOFE EDINA HOTEL Mortens�on El AaDdel�, NG RE1Cr�.Ncl O ` OCT 1 7 2063 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMffFAL )CTOBER 27. 2008 PLANT SCHEDULE AND LANDSCAPE DETAILS n- iaemR -e•e - [ .• [W.rsc•R v!¢.S ..Waal .Yewa [a qY ®s .. Wsrw. •• srza m¢A now .0 vrvrrew elm xpi em¢}® B. v..Lmri .tt vrmsor stm mml �� a mDlvr•rz [vsr.p mom. x .ExrKw .xW ra•¢wurr .w maa4p eeEm,im. ra mr xpm 9 MNCau NOTES: ' 0..rrr lr00t wsT Q •C¢.rYAL .Mr Y]SIOM6 a .nvDOi ]eel e.a 1p r¢[OxxG M Si•rIMD Rw MD 4r.A5. BANAL 5D[ rA..l B•ODLL BAUEO t aUlallAP[D CQ•TAWEa STpCA BMIE RODT sipP[ sr �sc... sas •xp Barar o r, m.v rwrs ° w.rz. ra Al i mo�B w[WS cwacl�..axm�c r nc. r( +n ­- AS .Na ,o im e• M [xOx¢x } .tt r. ;crM 0.w sixl B/i x01 reYa w }. l 4r a rwasnre@p N.nK .elvl •s aa<Rp B. M B.Dau sa wliµymR � !�0 M 1 xa�OVC O�i.Ka ul 49a ]. s� . sRS u0 IDxW a rLYa rs .r a r rp r ta4 a s4Y.ss m a maam .w r]macm( ­�wD w¢iv.} +psl AS pE¢crza n ra rLwI.L KCC .tt R .] N[QSSw., wWp a. c p.[.. •r0 .$ B•ALr. (f Y4D} .. Yr� Nr w Vr05iY�p •. Sr[A 0.wi pW[[M1. lalV Kr. a•oYat ip ...r .. � a mDrpDDA. ..rte YT r(wr m M •ra• rr a M >m a •DVnt sa. v .vE rs .rwm4um..i M eaaret.. rrOr ura 0.w W�srYl 0.M]t m M R^ O M rwpa0 s0. 6CV.na A,­ A,­ .. M roo rn ¢ ra B•atET M —1 n.ra EP rs •r w w ra sr+Na errors pui [sEnr. 0.we M la iE9 xapD]r4 Arts ! i• •e0[[ ra r.1aaD a•pC Yl oaCD.AT e•Dfu .tt ra ..o63TA n DI(•rza. 450 YYO.( ILA r0 YfaL 0.•xrs Ym 410E rp Yru 0.Yrrs •rm •[( ewa.v •xD vES rADr M io• a m�ixwaoa..na ] � � •DDS. rn a ra BYL 4.rpa .0 r.ee °� a •rzv gawon• .Aa } !�u>sRt �aB.NLL .w M ). 0..4 Y¢w .ttw .! 1101/15 xpYVS 0..Q .ww .ir.r •! e �5ra m YrrLC 0..vn YO rAt M YmrO A•raL VHCS] YcaO .•rt•vl SDL YD9Nf6 R arzL[s9H. Vtu55 SDL WlrMd R CK[593L M r41M0� na1.rL muss ma E Sua xNrlar. m�Wrox¢ .B4wr.[ sPrmr arras. ra Rr •xD app. e+lt w ]¢¢ssw+. ANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS PlM]IWL IrPL PYCNYCgs (YWgUY Y9)TM DOES NOT APPLY q MASS gANIWp BUDS) •LL VuUES MC AS fOLL ONS: r_ rvm Ii2i2s tN.snxc w•¢ •Q• 0.Yri •Cp0a0rr4' 10 0.NrwL gl•LS AS •.WC•eQ. Y}OwG 6.9rLi. F_. _ Sr. P J6• a.MO 10.9. BO �.._ ..... � r Cw tapcl un].rc B•ax PLANING DETAIL FOR STEEP SLOPES AA so.o«c p x¢C (Kw.nw EOM a e• na rt+vn vmr s.srxr, sY® 0.•rrPl BID •AB SOL (ttwDrpr[. EppID ®1 read rWlafn Dua PLIWTING DETAIL FOR MASS PLANING BEDS ¢rrtau xprts VA 0 wr .rr[ xiw� o - i F. �� [r -.nl SYYEl x]wrpran vmrs pu• a rwrarAm �� r(,a°a aaA RMC �w� ur[a4 aWl rL]¢ Arms r.a r®w amr9 0.we. .via B.Cxrrtcwc Arr a[ iww lK r[ •e0H IxpMD w.a [t(v +nw.K PLANTING DEPTH DETAIL xarc YC xppT f[W rp mrra a my�yy� 0.+x19 9rYL npl ME-.' rEW E. Su09pxc Oar�wrzOa• �.AW^9r+L[ ¢ ]xi [uw Dmrx n�ir+wr.um r • rom�AOrw a° ¢.nr .r .M mas xro vw Twu �.x ¢. ¢.L +¢.[xr Yaw sn.0 eE gryvpE M YNV•N ¢.tt �araa .a. vea¢x4 w [ass rs a¢saa .• - tarr�•Rp M nAM .M SotnaYi x..[ r�narD ✓. w MCm 1D • DNM OI[.Rn �NSOrIm eMN praC}EB er M aor¢x_ ;. vuu Y4w B•Dr xp [LS w•n r w NB YDa ww e• ma ra nn1. W ! QI]iEa Q mpE R TYPE OF PLANT Drnw tl DEPa[ _ 6 wwr to eR.xL].gc ro w[a YIAa YDLw WE wLLN [a!E apwwa Aa[S Y r.r N • • _e CwxS.M aeelBS Y Br1 ]' -. - ¢pwM sxmes carts _ _ rcm�.v[s rYms r w - awaAW.rzn MLS 1r a.am tD4 a x¢L MULCH PLACEMENT DETAIL ALOFE EDINA HOTEL Mortens�on El AaDdel�, NG RE1Cr�.Ncl O ` OCT 1 7 2063 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMffFAL )CTOBER 27. 2008 PLANT SCHEDULE AND LANDSCAPE DETAILS n- iaemR tN.snxc w•¢ •Q• 0.Yri •Cp0a0rr4' 10 0.NrwL gl•LS AS •.WC•eQ. Y}OwG 6.9rLi. F_. _ Sr. P J6• a.MO 10.9. BO �.._ ..... � r Cw tapcl un].rc B•ax PLANING DETAIL FOR STEEP SLOPES AA so.o«c p x¢C (Kw.nw EOM a e• na rt+vn vmr s.srxr, sY® 0.•rrPl BID •AB SOL (ttwDrpr[. EppID ®1 read rWlafn Dua PLIWTING DETAIL FOR MASS PLANING BEDS ¢rrtau xprts VA 0 wr .rr[ xiw� o - i F. �� [r -.nl SYYEl x]wrpran vmrs pu• a rwrarAm �� r(,a°a aaA RMC �w� ur[a4 aWl rL]¢ Arms r.a r®w amr9 0.we. .via B.Cxrrtcwc Arr a[ iww lK r[ •e0H IxpMD w.a [t(v +nw.K PLANTING DEPTH DETAIL xarc YC xppT f[W rp mrra a my�yy� 0.+x19 9rYL npl ME-.' rEW E. Su09pxc Oar�wrzOa• �.AW^9r+L[ ¢ ]xi [uw Dmrx n�ir+wr.um r • rom�AOrw a° ¢.nr .r .M mas xro vw Twu �.x ¢. ¢.L +¢.[xr Yaw sn.0 eE gryvpE M YNV•N ¢.tt �araa .a. vea¢x4 w [ass rs a¢saa .• - tarr�•Rp M nAM .M SotnaYi x..[ r�narD ✓. w MCm 1D • DNM OI[.Rn �NSOrIm eMN praC}EB er M aor¢x_ ;. vuu Y4w B•Dr xp [LS w•n r w NB YDa ww e• ma ra nn1. W ! QI]iEa Q mpE R TYPE OF PLANT Drnw tl DEPa[ _ 6 wwr to eR.xL].gc ro w[a YIAa YDLw WE wLLN [a!E apwwa Aa[S Y r.r N • • _e CwxS.M aeelBS Y Br1 ]' -. - ¢pwM sxmes carts _ _ rcm�.v[s rYms r w - awaAW.rzn MLS 1r a.am tD4 a x¢L MULCH PLACEMENT DETAIL ALOFE EDINA HOTEL Mortens�on El AaDdel�, NG RE1Cr�.Ncl O ` OCT 1 7 2063 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMffFAL )CTOBER 27. 2008 PLANT SCHEDULE AND LANDSCAPE DETAILS n- iaemR rEW E. Su09pxc Oar�wrzOa• �.AW^9r+L[ ¢ ]xi [uw Dmrx n�ir+wr.um r • rom�AOrw a° ¢.nr .r .M mas xro vw Twu �.x ¢. ¢.L +¢.[xr Yaw sn.0 eE gryvpE M YNV•N ¢.tt �araa .a. vea¢x4 w [ass rs a¢saa .• - tarr�•Rp M nAM .M SotnaYi x..[ r�narD ✓. w MCm 1D • DNM OI[.Rn �NSOrIm eMN praC}EB er M aor¢x_ ;. vuu Y4w B•Dr xp [LS w•n r w NB YDa ww e• ma ra nn1. W ! QI]iEa Q mpE R TYPE OF PLANT Drnw tl DEPa[ _ 6 wwr to eR.xL].gc ro w[a YIAa YDLw WE wLLN [a!E apwwa Aa[S Y r.r N • • _e CwxS.M aeelBS Y Br1 ]' -. - ¢pwM sxmes carts _ _ rcm�.v[s rYms r w - awaAW.rzn MLS 1r a.am tD4 a x¢L MULCH PLACEMENT DETAIL ALOFE EDINA HOTEL Mortens�on El AaDdel�, NG RE1Cr�.Ncl O ` OCT 1 7 2063 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMffFAL )CTOBER 27. 2008 PLANT SCHEDULE AND LANDSCAPE DETAILS n- iaemR MULCH PLACEMENT DETAIL ALOFE EDINA HOTEL Mortens�on El AaDdel�, NG RE1Cr�.Ncl O ` OCT 1 7 2063 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMffFAL )CTOBER 27. 2008 PLANT SCHEDULE AND LANDSCAPE DETAILS n- iaemR Aloft Edl— Hotel GENERAL NOTE: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION I 01Y.0" - #19 C) ff CIVIL ELEVATION 826.0' Mortensen r Z".W. It 10 77 It REMVEO ,I c�� - ` t` r.�... CT 2 7 2008 FIN DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 27, 2008 T EXISTING BUILD pR ....... ... eNORTH A I Aloft Edina Hotel . - 194' -b' . _ .. .. ,....... F.'Iort f Mortensonn o o OP m —t ,I 1 FINAL I 1_ _ LAN SUBMITTAL . rl' I —• F— ` 1- I ; ' _." __... PLAN SUBMITTAL i� � - OCTOBER 27, 2008 '• i . _ ...\\ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ .. ..83.0• ._i I um: s n01 n9j ®NORTH . ..e tlC etc ale.) 9-31 9-1 loll"01 —44'-4' TMPICALGUEB WVLEIMLPLAN-LEVELBZ- I eNORTH Aloft EdI,a Hotel F.IOFt Mortenso ........... FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL ,CTOBER 27. 2006 A3 r Aloft Edina Hotel EM I Mortenson . ,, SOUTH EInERIOR ELEVATION. 1p..I - ZZ i 9 9 �. WA — - -_ _— - -- - - -- -- a 6 FINAL OEV ELOPMENT ULAN SUBMITTAL • ` �r _'� - _ I___ __ -- I �J --�—�� 1 ..7 1' "���� OCTOBER 27. 2008 JI �,YYESL ETIFJ00R EIFI.TION - - -- .•..__ - - -- -- -- - -- - - -- -' - - -- - � - - - - -� - -- .. — - - -- J 1:11 z 1 F-: n- aw �,YYESL ETIFJ00R EIFI.TION - - -- .•..__ - - -- -- -- - -- - - -- -' - - -- - � - - - - -� - -- .. — - - -- T AI■A Nlx■ HOW 11 IS u ■ F ■ ■ lO� 1 � : w.„ss•,.. e. new Morte sonn.. i : r: WAS •r• 11Ma.■!■F41!■I!!n!11NJaraeL ' .,.,,... . ! .. ....... _ . FINAL - y ••• _-_ - — - - •' B OEVELOFNENT 1 FLAN III MrrTAL I' ' i :;i.; • CTO1E■ 7r. 7001 � 1 1 Hmm �i tip... _ - -. rks ...•,,.. I I i i l u„aw xaw.xua Q)i!LL1M�---- rriol}es■m�lelr■s r - -- AS :7pp Aloft Edina HOW Olort • Mortensen t. tm... I- 4r, -Ar .............. HSI=- nay 1p — wKsiffisaw.mirm" PLAN SURNMAL OCTONER 27.2095 A. e MEMORANDUM — Plan Review •,�• ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: November 19, 2008 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle - Director of Public Works / City Engineer �,(J SUBJECT: Aloft Edina Hotel Gateway - Phase 1 Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be reviewing the Traffic Impact Study at their and November 20 ETC Meeting and draft minutes will be attached to this memo. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as MNDH, MPCA, and MCES. • All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. • An agreement will be required. with the developer for items identified in the Preliminary Development Plan Agreement. Sheet — C2.0 General Notes and Details: 1. Submit design calculations for Underground Infiltration Structure. 2. Include a pipe bedding detail — see City's web site for detail. 3. Include Sanitary Manhole Detail — see City's web site for detail. Sheet — C4.0 Site and Paving Plan: 1. Show a "right -in / right -out' at this access point. This should be accomplished with a "pork - chop" island with proper signage. Sheet — C6.0 Site Drainage Plan: 1. Verify that MH4 contains a oil separator prior to discharging storm water into ADS Manifold. 2. Call out inlet protection on all existing and proposed catch basins around site. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks A�4 GAEngineer1ng \GeneraR70 - 79 Streets \77th Street West - Gateway%Loft Hotel\20081120 review of Aloft.doc Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. a. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: IV.a From: Jack Sullivan, PE ACTION: Assistant City Engineer ® Recommendation /Motion Date: November 20, 2008 ® Discussion Subject: Aloft Edina Hotel R. Information Phase 1 Final Development Plan Recommendation: Review the following attached documents: Transportation Impact Analysis for Phase 1 Final Development Plan — Aloft Edina Hotel Review letter to Mortenson Development dated November 14, 2008 Review memo from WSB dated November 12, 2008. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the development application has satisfied the Staff and WSB review memorandums and that the "Phase 1 Final Development Plan — Aloft Edina Hotel" Transportation Impact Analysis is within the parameters set forth in the AUAR study, Preliminary Development Plan and Overall Development Plan and that the transportation system is not adversely effected by this development. There are outstanding items as listed in the letter by City staff dated November 14, 2008. Staff has been in communication with the Development Team and has come to verbal agreement on the majority of these items. It is our understanding that these items will be completed in writing prior to the ETC meeting and addressed with the commission members on the 20th of November by both staff and the development team. Info /Background: The developer came to the City in the spring of 2007 about a possible redevelopment of the area near 77th Street from Trunk Highway 100 to Minnesota Boulevard. A.11 G:\Engineering\lnfiastructure\Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\20081120 Aloft_Edina_Hotel_Traffic _ study.doc Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item N. a. The consulting firm of WSB and Associates completed an Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR) of the project site. One of the components of an AUAR is transportation impacts to the project site. The ETC has reviewed the AUAR and recommended that the draft AUAR document be released for public comment on June 21, 2007. Since that time the final AUAR document has been approved by all regulatory agencies as well as the Edina City Council on November 5, 2007. The ETC has reviewed and approved the Preliminary Development Plan at the November 15, 2007 meeting. The ETC has also reviewed and approved the Overall Development Plan at the February 21, 2008 meeting. A in G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\ 20081120_ Aloft _Edina_Hotel_Traffic_study.doc , c t e Nry �5 Cii y of W11111 November 14, 2008 Mr. Chris Winter Mortenson Development 700 Meadow Lane North Minneapolis, MN 55422 RE: Review of Phase 1 Final Development Plan — Aloft Edina Hotel Dear Mr. Winter: The City of Edina and WSB and Associates have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Report for "Phase 1 Final Development Plan — Aloft Edina Hotel. The following outstanding issues need to be addressed prior to the November 20, 2008 Transportation Commission meeting. 1. The City requests a traffic analysis of the 2009 Phase 1 Build Operations without the four improvements outlined in the 2009 Phase 1 No -Build Scenario. It is critical to quantify the traffic implications of associated without the infrastructure improvements as outline in section 6.2 and figure A6. 2. All comments in the attached WSB memo dated November 12, 2008. Please call me at (952) 826 -0445 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, f Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer Attachments: Memo from Chuck Rickart of WSB & Associates, Inc. dated Nov. 12, 2008 c: Wayne Houle — Public Works Director /City Engineer Chris Hickok — Wayzata Properties Dan Cole — Kimley -Horn and Associates JoNette Kuhnau -- Kimley -Horn and Associates Chuck Rickart — WSB and Associates hag GAEn6neerine \Genera1\70 - 79 Streets \77th Street Nest - Ga1e%%,ay\ALo11 Hotel\20031 114 Mortenson Development 'rralfic doc City Hall 952 -927 -8861 FAX q52 -1121, -0390 -lmol \ -\,Etir 50T1 -1 STREET EDIN \, 141NNESOTA, 55-12 -1 -1:19 I \ \'1 \'1V.Ul \'t)fC(Illld.lO1)1 l rl' 9.5_'- N2( -03; 9 'A WSB - Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 & Associates, Inc. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541.4800 Fax: 763 5414700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: November 12, 2008 Re: Edina Gateway — Pentagon Park Redevelopment Phase I Final Development Plan Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686-02 As you requested, we have reviewed the traffic impact study prepared by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. for the proposed Edina Gateway — Pentagon Park Redevelopment, Phase 1— Aloft Edina Hotel. The proposed redevelopment is located south of 77`x' Street on the east side of the TH 100 north frontage road. The proposed redevelopment of Phase 1 of the overall Edina Gateway — Pentagon Park Redevelopment plan includes a 150 -room hotel development. It also includes demolition of two existing buildings on the existing Pentagon Park site. Based on a review of the traffic impact study, the following questions and comments are made: 1. In general, the traffic impact analysis follows the guidelines and process set forth as part of the Overall Development Plan and AUAR. 2. In Section 2. 1, Site Access, the text indicates that access to the hotel will be via two access points along the TH 100 frontage road. Looking at the figures, it appears that access can also be provided through the parking lots of the Pentagon Park office tower site. This should be clarified. 3. Section 2.2, Existing Land Use, indicates that the building occupancy has not changed from the original AUAR and Overall Development Plan. This is a fine assumption as long as the occupancy has not increased over that time period. Please verify that the occupancy has either stayed the same or decreased. 4. Section 2.3, Existing Conditions and Traffic, indicates that the baseline traffic is based on traffic counts conducted in 2007. Although this is fine for this phase of the A3 ACEC 2008 Firm of the Year CsAEn&m gGmcsIV0 -79 Streeu17ft Strew Wca - GffinvAYftw1 -Aloft HomMEMO -boWl 111208.doc Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina November 12, 2008 Page 2 of 3 development, it should be noted that for subsequent phases, new traffic counts should be conducted to provide the most updated traffic information. 5. Section 6.0, Traffic Impact Analysis, includes a reference to an assumption that all intersections with failing operations should be addressed through signal timing first, if possible, then through implementation .of roadway improvements. Was there any review of signal timing changes for either the existing 2007 operations or the 2009 Phase 1 no -build operations? If signal timing alternatives were reviewed, please document and discuss any changes from the baseline signal timing that may have changed. 6. Section 6.3, 2009 Phase 1 Build Operations, included a reference to the signal timing optimization that was conducted to accommodate traffic growth and pattern changes. Similar to comment no. 5, was this included prior to the addition of the development traffic? 7. Section 6.3, 2009 Phase 1 Build Operations, the last paragraph indicates that the same issues occur in both Phase 1, no -build recommended and build conditions. Earlier in the text, it was indicated that the no -build recommended improvements identified were assumed as part of the build analysis. If this is a correct statement, it should be clarified. 8. Section 6.5, Parking Supply and Operations, more clarification should be given to how the parking spaces meet City code. This issue will be discussed more with the Planning Commission and City staff. 9. Section 7.0, Transit Facilities, a discussion on how hotel employees would have an opportunity to use transit should be included. 10. Section 8.0, Pedestrians and Bicycle Facilities, a reference to a new sidewalk on the east side of the TH 100 north frontage road is made. It should be clarified how this sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk system and the actual terminus of the new sidewalk. 11. Section 9.0, Travel Demand Management, a third bullet point should be included indicating that the developer will provide access to transit through sidewalk connections to 77th Street. 12. All figures should show an outline of the proposed Phase 1 development. 13. Figure A2 -3 Phase 1 site plan should include a legend or be more clearly defined on what is in place and what is new as part of the proposed development. 14. Figures A54 and A5 -5 indicate the no -build and build -lane geometry and indication of the changes between each of these should be indicated or these figures should be combined if there is no change between them. 01 G:%Fngbiwmg%Gwtrd%70 - 79 Saede\M SUM We9 - GaLMyft=1- AUR HoWVAEMO- whoWo-l117NA= Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina November 12, 2008 Page 3 of 3 In addition to these comments, WSB included this development as part of the overall southeast Edina Transportation Model to review potential impacts at non -site related intersections. This review concluded that no significant change in intersection levels of service or anticipated traffic queues would occur with this development. Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and traffic impacts, it appears the proposed Phase 1 development plan is consistent with the Overall Development Plan and AUAR prepared for this site. Therefore, I would recommend approval of the Phase 1 development plan for this site. 43a G:En&eCfM9\GacelV0 - 79 SaodgMth Sven wm- c=myen =i -nLCe H.UMEEMO- hoWel uzos.aoo ❑ � ❑ Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Memorandum ■ Suite 345N 2550 University Avenue West St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer, City of Edina Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer, City of Edina Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, WSB & Associates, Inc. From: JoNette Kuhnau, PE, PTOE Melissa Barnes, EIT Date: November 18, 2008 RE: Edina Gateway Pentagon Park Redevelopment Phase 1 Final Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Report The purpose of this memorandum is to address City Consultant comments (the "Comments ") dated November 12, 2008, from City review of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Report for the Edina Gateway Phase 1Final Development Plan dated October 2008. The City Consultant comment is show in italics followed by the response in normal text: In general, the traffic impact analysis follows the guidelines and process set forth as part of the Overall Development Plan and AUAR. Comment noted. 2. In Section 2. 1, Site Access, the text indicates that access to the hotel will be via two access points along the TH 100 frontage road. Looking at the figures, it appears that access can also be provided through the parking lots of the Pentagon Park office tower site. This should be clarified. Secondary access is available through the Pentagon Park office parking lots. However, no trips were assigned to those access points because the most convenient access to the hotel would be via the TH 100 NB Frontage Road. This assumption represents a "worse case" analysis where nearly all the traffic would be concentrated at the W 77th Street/TH 100 NB intersection, rather than spread out over several intersections. 3. Section 2. 2, Existing Land Use, indicates that the building occupancy has not changed from the original AUAR and Overall Development Plan. This is a fine assumption as long as the occupancy has not increased over that time period. Please verb that the occupancy has either stayed the same or decreased. As of November 18, 2008, the building occupancy on the Pentagon Towers site is 66.5 percent, excluding the two buildings on the hotel site that are currently vacant in preparation for being removed as part of the Phase 1 ■ TEL 651 645 4197 A 3 3 FAX 651 645 5116 November 18, 2008 Page 2 of 9 development. Therefore, the analysis that was done assuming 69.3 percent occupancy was conservative. Overall in the Pentagon Park complex, the occupancy has gone from approximately 65.6 percent as documented in the Overall Development Plan to a current rate of approximately 57.5 percent. 4. Section 2.3, Existing Conditions and Traffic, indicates that the baseline traffic is based on traffic counts conducted in 2007. Although this is fine for this phase of the development, it should be noted that for subsequent phases, new traffic counts should be conducted to provide the most updated traffic information. Comment noted. New traffic counts will be done when future phases move into the Final Development Plan stage. 5. Section 6. 0, Traffic Impact Analysis, includes a reference to an assumption that all intersections with failing operations should be addressed through signal timing first, if possible, then through implementation of roadway improvements. Was there any review of signal timing changes for either the existing 2007 operations or the 2009 Phase I no -build operations? If signal timing alternatives were reviewed, please document and discuss any changes from the baseline signal timing that may have changed. Signal timings were optimized for the-2009 No Build scenario, due to the amount of background development occurring in the area. In response to discussions with the City of Edina regarding the potential impacts if the recommended No Build mitigation measures are not in place prior to the construction of Phase 1, an additional scenario was modeled for 2009 that documents the operations assuming Phase 1 is constructed with the existing roadway geometry, with no improvements. This scenario will be referred to in the remainder of this memo to as Build (No Improvements). At France Avenue and W 76`h Street, two Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period and three Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period. The Phase 1 site - generated trips during the AM and PM peak periods are less than 0.1% of the total intersection volume and therefore not assumed to cause any measurable additional delay. The simulation output indicates that the intersection remains at the same LOS in the Build (No Improvements) scenario as in the No Build scenario. At the W 78`h Street and France Avenue intersection, no Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period and three Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period. The Phase 1 site - generated trips represent 0.0% of the total intersection volume during the AM peak period and less than 0.1% of the total intersection volume in the PM peak period. Therefore, the addition of the site - generated trips does not result in any measurable increase in delay. The simulation output indicates that the intersection remains at the same LOS in the Build (No Improvements) scenario as in the No Build scenario. 03� November 18, 2008 Page 3 of 9 At Edina Industrial Boulevard and Metro Boulevard, 12 Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period and 23 Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period. The Phase 1 site - generated trips represent 0.6% of the total intersection volume during the AM peak period and 1.1% during the PM peak period. The simulation output indicates that during the AM peak period the intersection is a LOS C in the No Build scenario and a LOS D in the Build (No Improvements) scenario. However, the movement that had increased delay was the northbound left -turn, which did not have any Phase 1 site - generated traffic added. As the intersection delay increased only slightly over the LOS C/D threshold and the additional volumes were minor, it was concluded that there was no significant impact to intersection operations due to the Phase 1 site - generated traffic. During the PM peak period, the intersection operated at LOS E in the No Build scenario and a LOS D in the Build (No Improvements) scenario. The changes in intersection LOS are primarily to modeling variability and do not represent significant changes in operations. At W 77'h Street and TH 100 northbound, 52 Phase l site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period and 63 Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period. The site - generated trips during the AM and PM peak periods represent 1.8% of the total intersection volume during the peak periods. The simulation output indicates that the intersection remains at the same LOS in the Build (No Improvements) scenario as in the No Build scenario. Tables 4, 5, 6, & 7 from the TIA have been updated to include the 2009 Build (No Improvements) scenario. A -ss- C!J November 18, 2008 Page 4 of 9 Table 4. AM Peak Hour Level of Service 2009 No Build 2009 No Build (Immovedl 2009 Build (Improved) 2009 Build No Im revamente Intersection Traffic Control 2007 LOS I Delay Fidstina Notes LOS Delay Notes LOS Delay, Notes LOS Delay Notes LOS I Delay I Notes EBL, WBL, WBR, France Avenue I Traffic EBL, WBL, LOS E EBL, WBL, WBR LOS WBL, WBR LOS E EBT, WBT, NBL LOS SBL LOS E EBT, WBT, NBL LOS W 78th Street Signal EBT, WBT, WBR E NBL LOS F E 62.2 F E 57.5 F . C 30.9 NBL LOS E E 59.9 NBL LOS F E 62.1 EBT WBT Edina Industrial Traffic NBL LOS E Boulevard / Stand E C 31.7 EBL LOS F C 32.3 EBL LOS F D 40.6 NBL LOS F W 76th Street C 27,8 C 31.8 NBL LOS Edina Industrial Traffic - Boulevard / metro Boulevard Signal B 11.5 B 14.4 B 11.9 B 12.2 B 14.1 W 77th Street / Traffic TH 100 SB Signal C 28.3 C 29.3 C 30.7 EBL LOSE C 31.0 EBL LOS F C 31.0 W 77th Street / Traffic TH 100 NB Signal C 22.1 B 16.4 S 16.9 B 1609 B 18.0 W 77th Street I Tra18c Towers Site Access Signal A 5.0 A 5.9 A 5.3 A 4.6 A 6.0 W 77th Street I Tragc Computer Avenue Signal C 20.6 A 6.4 A 4.5 A 4.4 A 5.9 W 77th Street / Traffic Parklawn Avenue Signal C 20.9 B 19.8 B 10.5 NBL LOS E B 12.3 B 19.4 W 7M Street / Traffic Minnesota Drive / Slphd B 122 B 12.2 B 12.1 EBT LOS E B 12.4 Johnson Avenue B 11.7 EBL, NBL, SBL LOS France Avenue / Traffic E EBL, NBL LOS E Minnesota Drive Signal C 251 D 42.1 EB WBT LOS F D 39.3 EBT WBT LOS F D 39.0 EBT WBT LOS F D 40.3 EBT WBT LOS F E Bush Lake Road / Tragic I494WB Signal B 16.5 C 21.1 B 18.4 B 18.2 B 19.6 E Bush Lake Road / Traffic 1494 EB Signal B 14.6 B 16.8 C 2615 WBL LOS F D 35.1 WBL LOS F B 17.5 France Avenue/ Traffic NBL, EBL LOS E WBL, NBL LOSE NBL, WBL LOSE WBL WBT, NBIL LOS W 78th Street / 1494 W B Signal C 24.7 D 37.4 WBL WBT LOS F C 25.8 WBT LOS F C 25.1 WBT LOS F C 36.1 F France Avenue/ 1484 EB Traffic Signal C 21.3 NBL LOS E C 29.2 EBR LOS E D 41.6 NBT LOS F D 41.1 NBT LOS F C 29.0 EBR LOS E Viking Drive / TH 100 All Way NB Frontage Road Stop A 5,0 A 5.1 A 5.1 A 3.8 Computer Avenue/ All Way Viking Drive Stop A 5.4 A 5.4 A 5.4 A 5.1 Frontage Road / E Lag North Hotel Access Slop A 0.5 E LEG LOS A A 0.5 E LEG LOS A Frontage Road / E Leg South Hold Access Stop A 0.8 E LEG LOS A A 0.8 E LEG LOS A J November 18, 2008 Par S oj9 Table S. PM Peak Hour Level of bervrco 2009 No Build 2009 No BuHd f1morovedl, 2009 Build (improved) 2009 Build No linarmimentsl ntersection Traffic Control Existina LOS Dela Notes LOS Dela Notes LOS Delay Notes LOS Dela Notes LOS Del Notes ce Avenue/ 7relOc EBL, EBT, EBR, WBL, WBT, NBL, SBL, SBT, �� EBT, EBREWBL, SBL LOS E EBL, EBT. WBL, WBT, EBL, F9T, EBR WBL, WBTC Street Signal 32.2 F 177.3 SBR LOS F F 176.0 WBT SBT SBR LOS F F 112.6 NB SBT SBR LOS F F 156.0 NBL SB SBT SBR LOS F rW7760i ina Industrial Tra�Oc Boulevard/ 78th Street Signal C 29.7 C 31.8 WBL SBL LOS E C 32.6 WBL SBL LOS E C 30.4 C 29.4 WBL SBL LOS E ina Industrial Boulevard ! Traffic Signal EBR, NBT LOS E C 25.0 WBL LOSE D 45.6 EBL EST LOS F Boulevard E 71.3 E 56.0 EBL EST LOS F C 26.3 T W 77th Street! Traffic NBL, NBT, NBR SBT LOS E SBT LOS E 100 SB Signal D 46.2 EBT LOS F D 48.2 WBL SBL LOS F C 29.1 WBL LOS E C 29.2 SBL LOS E D 53.7 NB NBT NBR SBL LOS F W 77th Street / Traffic SBL LOS E NBR LOS E SBL LOS E TH 100 NB Signal D 50.6 EBL LOS F D 37A EB NBT SBT LOS F C 20.9 NBT LOS F C 24.0 NBT LOS E D 38.1 EBL NBT NBR SBT LOS F W 77th Street/ Traffic EBL, SBR LOS E � EBL. SBL, SBR LOS E Towers Site Access Signal C 26.6 B 12.5 NBL LOS F B 11.3 A 9.9 NBL LOS E B 13.5 NBL LOS F W 77th Street / Traffic Computer Avenue Signal C 23.4 B 10.1 A 9.3 A 9.4 B 10.6 W 77th Street / Traffic - Parldawn Avenue Signal C 32.4 B 18.1 B 16.5 B 18.6 B 17.8 W 77th Street / Trask EBL, EBT, WBL, WBT. EBL, EBT, WBL, WBT LOS h0nnesote Drive / Johnson Avenue ��� C 29.5 C 23.1 NBL LOS E C 22.7 EBT LOS E C 21.8 EBL, WBT LOSE C 23.0 E EBL, WBL, NBL LOS E EBL, WBL LOS E EBL. WBL LOS E EBL, WBL LOS E France Avenue / True/ Treflk EBT, WBT, SBL, SBT, EBT. WBT. NBL, SBL, EBT, WBT, NBL, SBL, SBT, EBT, WBT, NBL. SBL, SBT, Minnesota Signal E 67.6 WBL LOS F F 186.5 SBR LOS F F 182.7 SBT SBR LOS F F 165.9 SBR LOS F F 188.6 SBR LOS F E Bush Lake Road / Trask 4494 WO Signal B 11.2 B 11.7 B 11.5 B 11.8 B 11.9 E Bush Lake Road / Traflk 4494 EB Signal C 222 C C 22.3 C 22.2 C 21.7 France Avenue / Traffic SBT LOS E EBR SBT LOS E W 78th Street / 4494 W B Signal D 44.0 D tBl- SBT LOS E C 33.9 SBT EBL LOSE D 35.8 EBL LOS F D 42.7 EBL LOS F France Avenue / Traffic 4494 EB Signal B 17.7 C C 26.6 C 28.3 1 C 25.7 Viking Drive /TH 180 All Way NB Frontage Road Slop A 4.9 A 4.9 A 4.8 A 4.8 Computer Avenue / All Way Viking Drive Stop A 5.6 A 5.6 A 5.6 A 5.6 Frontage Road / E Leg North Hotel Access Stop A 0.5 E LEG LOS A A 0.5 E LEG LOS A Frontage Road / E Leg South Hotel Access Stop A 0.9 E LEG LOS A A 0.9 E LEG LOS A November 18, 2008 Page 6 of vTralfk 2007 2008 No Build 2009 No Build Ina 2008 Phase 1 Su id Ina Phase 1 Build No Ina M Oueue Nofea I Ouem Lanoth Nobel Ouace Lorrain Notes Queue Length Notes Queue Length Notes Mtenoeelion Control France Avenuel Tram. T" We LT Wm- Two WB LT L-- Two WB LT la-- TwoWBLTlane.- 'W76th Slre4 sow WBL- 248200 queues of 1142DO WBL - 248200 queues of 11212DO Will. - 237200 queues of 10520D WBL - 233200 queussomMOD WBR- 1031100 end 248200 WBR- 129110D end 48200 WBR - 115100 and 237200 WBR - 1021100 and 2331200 Fdna Wtotrlel Treble Boulevanl/ signal W 7BIh Street NBL - 347280 NBL•346rAD NBL- 35328D Edna Industrial Treblb B.Ward / Signal Metro Boulward W 771h Street I TmMc TN 100 SS svw W 77th Street / Traffic TH 109 NB Signal W 77th Street I Traffic . Tawas Site Access signal W T71h Street I Treble Computer Benue Signal W 77th Snal / TMb Parkt —A-- sigrul W 771h Street Traffic hare. la Odes / s Jotnaon Avenue Fmnce Avenue/ TreMc NNmasav Odve svw NEIL-2645f240 NBL - 279240 E Bush Lake Road I Tre1M HB4 W S signal E Bush Lake Road I TMga F494 EB Signal France Avenue I Tmffla W 78th Street I Signal F494 We France Avenue/ Traffic M94 EB S¢pW Vking Ddva I TH 100 A" W.' NB Frontage Road stop Computer Avenue/ AO Way _ VBm' g W. Slap Frontage Rued / E Lap Nonh Hold Awms Slop . Fmmags Road/ Elag South Hotel Access Slop . Vking Ddve / N Lap .. ... _. .. .. . Townie Site Aaess Slop - Computer Avenue / W Lap East Ranp Stop W 77th Streel / N Lag West Senior Acceca stop W 77th Street I N Leg East Senior A—* stop A31� November 18, 2008 Page 7 of 9 A'SI Trait - - -- 2007 Edsin 2003 No Build 2008 No Build n ee amv se 2009 Pha 1 Build Ion mved 2009 Ph ase 1 Brlld r No Im enbi InteraaWm Vol Cm Ousue Lanoth Nsas Notes Queue Lm Norm Queue Le Notes Ousre Lm Note. EBL - 257200 EBL - 2121200 EBL- 2682D0 Frenoe Avanuel TretOc Tao EB LT Was - EBR- 369240 T —EBLTI - EBR - 9521240 Teo EB LT Imes- EBR- 360240 Teo EBLTlanes- W 76th.— SgrW qusm of 143200 WBL•231QW queueso /152200 WBL- 2322D0 queues of 1502D0 WBL- 273200 queued A 16212D0 F-27 end %0200 WBL283200 end 251200 WBL- 2BD200 and 2421200 WBL - 281200 end 286200 Edna lrdL.VW TrMt . Barlevad l- W 780, Street Signal Edina Industrial Trek BousredI B-h—d Signal • 77th Saes/ TraRe EBT- 553968 EBTSEBTRqueua TH 100 SB Signal EBTR - pmt upstream - 541/468 Ieehone NBR- 271200 N13R- 267200 • 77th Strad/ Tnaft TH 10D NS Signal EEL - 4251395 EBL - 4111395 EBL•431335 • T7th Streel l TreFio Tower Sts Ancess SVW EBL- 107170 .EBL- 108/70 W 771h Saes / Trtem C —P.ter Avenue SOW - W 77th SOW TnaRc Parts— Avenue . Owed . W 7704 Stres/ Traft 111 —dis Dr"I Johnson Avenue signal ESL •249200 EBL- 269200 WBL - 4051400 WBL- 4091400 SBL- 2271160 SBL- 2231150 SM. - 217/150 SSL- 2301150 Fran ®A...I Traft - SBT- 155311215 SBT- 151211215 SBT- 149W1215 SST- 155211215 Ml-..M Drk. Signal SST- 151011215 SST- 1 5 0 917 215 SBT -747 1215 SBT- 154311215 SBT - 157011210 SBT queues pad SST - 151911215 SBT queues pest SBT- 74SW1215 SBT queues Peat SBT - 7577/1215 SBT queues past SBT - 10941900 upstream SBT - 157811215 upsream SBT - 153017215 upstream SBT - 10761900 upstream WBL- 5181400 1 SBR- 11641900 Int.—done SBR•1187I900 Intersections I SBR - 11221900 Inaaseedeas SBR- 11331800 In actions E Bush take Road I Traft 1994 WB Signal E Bush Lase Road / Trdllo ' M94 ES Sgnal Frarm Armual SBT - 8131988 SST- 4591988 SBT - 5091388 W7BIh Street/ T1ethe SBT - 494/388 SBT queues Past SST- 62111988 SBT queued Past :T :46 SBT - 5741!88 SBT queues pest SBT - 604/3118 SBT queues past 1984 WB Signal SBT - 444/380 upebmm SBT - 4711!88 upstr®m SBT - 4671386 upstream 587.4551388 - upstream SBT - 4681385 Intermcliors EST •4B513B8 InteseMloas SBT - 4941388 Intareecllons SBT- 472rMS Insrsactbm Frame Avenue/ Traft Id94 EB Signal vRdng Di.l TH 100 AS Way _ NS Fro9age Road Slop Conrputer AVe I All Way Wong OMe Stop .. Frontage Road / E Leg . North Hotel Access Stop Frmmge Road I E leg - - South Hotel A— Slop - A'SI November 18, 2008 Page 8 of 9 6. Section 6.3, 2009 Phase 1 Build Operations, included a reference to the signal timing optimization that was conducted to accommodate traffic growth and pattern changes. Similar to comment no. S, was this included prior to the addition of the development traffic? Yes. See response to comment 5. Section 6.3, 2009 Phase 1 Build Operations, the last paragraph indicates that the same issues occur in both Phase 1, no -build recommended and build conditions. Earlier in the text, it was indicated that the no -build recommended improvements identified were assumed as part of the build analysis. If this is a correct statement, it should be clarified. All improvements identified in the No Build analysis were assumed to be inplace as part of the Build analysis. The last paragraph should be clarified to state that only the operations issues that were unmitigated along France Avenue still occur in the Phase 1 Build scenario. 8. Section 6.5, Parking Supply and Operations, more clarification should be given to how the parking spaces meet City code. This issue will be discussed more with the Planning Commission and City staff. The existing Pentagon Towers site does not meet Edina City code in terms of the number of spaces provided; however, there is no current parking shortage on the site due at least in part to the current occupancy rate of 66.5 percent. Current Edina City Code would require 711 spaces for the existing buildings that total 168,496 square feet as compared to the 626 spaces currently provided. During the demolition and construction phases, City Code would require 632 spaces based on the 146,506 square feet remaining, compared to the 587 spaces that would be available. Similar to the existing condition, factoring the required number of spaces by the occupancy rate, only 420 spaces would be expected to be needed and no parking shortage would be expected Upon completion of the hotel, a total of 655 parking spaces will be provided City Code requires 170 spaces for the hotel and 632 spaces for the office, for a total of 802 spaces. Again, the office uses would be expected to generate a significantly lower parking demand compared to that calculated using City Code due in part to the occupancy rates on the site. Further, the hotel and office are compatible uses for shared parking because the peak time for parking at the office would be the off -peak for parking at the hotel and vise versa. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) shared parking calculation results in a maximum parking demand of 634 spaces on the site, which is less than the 655 parking spaces provided. Based on the overall occupancy on the site and the ability for the office and hotel to share parking, no parking shortages are expected, even though the site does not meet City Code in terms of the total number of parking spaces provided A 40 November 18, 2008 Page 9 of 9 9. Section 7. 0, Transit Facilities, a discussion on how hotel employees would have an opportunity to use transit should be included. Transit is available to all current and future users of the site, as there are bus stops located near the W 77`h Street/Computer Avenue intersection. 10. Section 8. 0, Pedestrians and Bicycle Facilities, a reference to a new sidewalk on the east side of the TH 100 north frontage road is made. It should be clarified how this sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk system and the actual terminus of the new sidewalk. New sidewalk will be constructed along the TH 100 NB frontage road from the south hotel access and extending north to connect to the existing sidewalk in the southeast quadrant of the W 77th Street/TH 100 NB intersection. I1. Section 9. 0, Travel Demand Management, a third bullet point should be included indicating that the developer will provide access to transit through sidewalk connections to 77'x' Street. Comment noted. Improved access to the bus stops on W 77`h Street will be accomplished through the new sidewalk to be constructed on the site and along the TH 100 NB frontage road, as described in the response to comment 10. 12. All figures should show an outline of the proposed Phase I development. Following a discussion with the City of Edina, it was determined that the figures would not be modified. 13. Figure A2 -3 Phase I site plan should include a legend or be more clearly defined on what is in place and what is new as part of the proposed development. Following a discussion with the City of Edina, it was determined that the figure would not be modified. 14. Figures A54 and AS -5 indicate the no -build and build -lane geometry and indication of the changes between each of these should be indicated or these figures should be combined if there is no change between them. Figure A6 illustrates the differences between the No Build and No Build Improved lane geometrics and would illustrate the difference between the No Build Improved and Build Improved lane geometrics, if there were any. In this case, the geometrics are the same in the No Build Improved and the Build scenarios, as there were no recommended improvements based on the Build analysis. The geometrics shown in Figures A54 and A5 -5 are consistent with the format of those included in the Overall Development Plan. 4 Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. a. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: IV.a From: Jack Sullivan, PE ACTION: Assistant City Engineer ® Recommendation /Motion Date: November 20, 2008 ® Discussion Subject: Aloft Edina Hotel ❑ Information Phase 1 Final Development Plan REVISED NOV. 20, 2008 Recommendation: All items highlighted in yellow are additions since the initial Report/Recommendation was created. Review the following attached documents: ■ Transportation Impact Analysis for Phase 1 Final Development Plan — Aloft Edina Hotel ■ Review letter to Mortenson Development dated November 14, 2008 ■ Review memo from WSB dated November 12, 2008. ■ Review memo from Kimley -Horn and Associates dated November 18, 2008 If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the development application has satisfied the Staff and-WSB review memorandums . and that the "Phase 1 Final Development Plan — Aloft Edina Hotel' Transportation Impact Analysis is within the parameters set forth in the AUAR study, Preliminary Development Plan and Overall Development Plan and that the transportation system is not adversely effected by this development. There are outstanding items as listed in the letter by City staff dated November 14, 2008. Staff has been in communication with the Development Team and has come to verbal agreement on the majority of these items. It is our understanding that these items will be completed in writing prior to the ETC meeting and addressed with the commission members on the 20th of November by both staff and the development team. A4i G:\ Engineering\lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\ 20081120_ Revised_ Aloft _Edina_Hotel_Traftic_study.doc Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission r Item IV. a. The Development Team has since provided acceptable further study results in the Kimley- Horn memo dated November 18, 2008. At this time all outstanding questions and concerns from Staff and WSB have been addressed. The above Staff recommends is still valid. Info /Background: The developer came to the City in the spring of 2007 about a possible redevelopment of the area near 77th Street from Trunk Highway 100 to Minnesota Boulevard. The consulting firm of WSB and Associates completed an Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR) of the project site. One of the components of an AUAR is transportation impacts to the project site. The ETC has reviewed the AUAR and recommended that the draft AUAR document be released for public comment on June 21, 2007. Since that time the final AUAR document has been approved by all regulatory agencies as well as the Edina City Council on November 5, 2007. The ETC has reviewed and approved the Preliminary Development Plan at the November 15, 2007 meeting. The ETC has also reviewed and approved the Overall Development Plan at the February 21, 2008 meeting. Aq 3 G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\ 2008 R&R\ 20081120_ Revised_ Aloft _Edina_Hotel_Ttafc_study.doc ❑ � ❑ IGmley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Memorandum ■ Suite 345N 2550 University Avenue West St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer, City of Edina Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer, City of Edina Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, WSB & Associates, Inc. From: JoNette Kuhnau, PE, PTOE Melissa Barnes, EIT Date: November 18, 2008. RE: Edina Gateway Pentagon Park Redevelopment Phase 1 Final Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Report The purpose of this memorandum is to address City Consultant comments (the "Comments ") dated November 12, 2008, from City review of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Report for the Edina Gateway Phase lFinal Development Plan dated October 2008. The City Consultant comment is show in italics followed by the response in normal text: 1. In general, the traffic impact analysis follows the guidelines and process set forth as part of the Overall Development Plan and AUAR. Comment noted. 2. In Section 2. 1, Site Access, the text indicates that access to the hotel will be via two access points along the TH 100 frontage road. Looking at the figures, it appears that access can also be provided through the parking lots of the Pentagon Park office tower site. This should be clarified. Secondary access is available through the Pentagon Park office parking lots. However, no trips were assigned to those access points because the most .convenient access to the hotel would be via the TH 100 NB Frontage Road. This assumption represents a "worse case" analysis where nearly all the traffic would be concentrated at the W 77`s Street/TH 100 NB intersection, rather than spread out over several intersections. 3. Section 2.2, Existing Land Use, indicates that the building occupancy has not changed from the original AUAR and Overall Development Plan. This is a fine assumption as long as the occupancy has not increased over that time period. Please verify that the occupancy has either stayed the same or decreased. As of November 18, 2008, the building occupancy on the Pentagon Towers site is 66.5 percent, excluding the two buildings on the hotel site that are currently vacant in preparation for being removed as part of the Phase 1 TEL 651 645 4197 FAX 651 645 5116 g4 November 18, 2008 Page 2 of development. Therefore, the analysis that was done assuming 69.3 percent occupancy was conservative. Overall in the Pentagon Park complex, the occupancy has gone from approximately 65.6 percent as documented in the Overall Development Plan to a current rate of approximately 57.5 percent. 4. Section 2.3, Existing Conditions and Traffic, indicates that the baseline traff c is based on traffic counts conducted in 2007. Although this is fine for this phase of the development, it should be noted that for subsequent phases, new traffic counts should be conducted to provide the most updated hall c information. Comment noted. New traffic counts will be done when future phases move into the Final Development Plan stage. S. Section 6. 0, Traffic Impact Analysis, includes a reference to an assumption that all intersections with failing operations should be addressed through signal timing first, if possible, then through implementation of roadway improvements. Was there any review of signal timing changes for either the existing 2007 operations or the 2009 Phase 1 no -build operations? If signal timing alternatives were reviewed, please document and discuss any changes from the baseline signal timing that may have changed. Signal timings were optimized for the 2009 No Build scenario, due to the amount of background development occurring in the area. In response to discussions with the City of Edina regarding the potential impacts if the recommended No Build mitigation measures are not in place prior to the construction of Phase 1, an additional scenario was modeled for 2009 that documents the operations assuming Phase 1 is constructed with the existing roadway geometry, with no improvements. This scenario will be referred to in the remainder of this memo to as Build (No Improvements). At France Avenue and W 76h Street, two Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period a4d three Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period. The Phase 1 site - generated trips during the AM and PM peak periods are less than 0.1% of the total intersection volume and therefore not assumed to cause any measurable additional delay. The simulation output indicates that the intersection remains at the same LOS in the Build (No Improvements) scenario as in the No Build scenario. At the W 78th Street and France Avenue intersection, no Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period and three Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period. The Phase 1 site - generated trips represent 0.0% of the total intersection volume during the AM peak period and less than 0.1% of the total intersection volume in the PM peak period. Therefore, the addition of the site - generated trips does not result in any measurable increase in delay. The simulation output indicates that the intersection remains at the same LOS in the Build (No Improvements) scenario as in the No Build scenario. *S- r November 18, 2008 Page 3 of 9 At Edina Industrial Boulevard and Metro Boulevard, 12 Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period and 23 Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period The Phase 1 site - generated trips represent 0.6% of the total intersection volume during the AM peak period and 1.1% during the PM peak period. The simulation output indicates that during the AM peak period the intersection is a LOS C in the No Build scenario and a LOS D in the Build (No Improvements) scenario. However, the movement that had increased delay was the northbound left -turn, which did not have any Phase 1 site - generated traffic added. As the intersection delay increased only slightly over the LOS C/D threshold and the additional volumes were minor, it was concluded that there was no significant impact to intersection operations due to the Phase 1 site - generated traffic. During the PM peak period, the intersection operated at LOS E in the No Build scenario and a LOS D in the Build (No Improvements) scenario. The changes in intersection LOS are primarily to modeling variability and do not represent significant changes in operations. At W 77`h Street and TH 100 northbound, 52 Phase. l site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the AM peak period and 63 Phase 1 site - generated trips are assumed to use this intersection in the PM peak period. The site - generated trips during the AM and PM peak periods represent 1.8% of the total intersection volume during the peak periods. The simulation output indicates that the intersection remains at the same LOS in the Build (No Improvements) scenario as in the No Build scenario. Tables 4, 5, 6, & 7 from the TIA have been updated to include the 2009 Build (No Improvements) scenario. J November 18, 2008 Pajtd 4 df 9 I note r. AIVI rcux nuur snvcr Traffic ur acrvnc 2007 Exlstin °- - - 2009 No - Build . - - '" 2009 - No Build Irr roved - 2009 Build Im roved - 2009 Build No Im rovamenls Intersection Control LOS Dele Notes LOS Dela Notes LOS Dela Notes Dela Notes . LOS Dele ' Notes EBL. WBL. WBR. France Avenue / Taffic EBL, WBL. LOS E EBL; WBL. WBR LOS WBL, WBR LOS E - SBL LOSE W 76th Street Signal EBT, WBT, WBR. - . E FBT. WBT, NBL LOS EBT. WBT. NBL LOS C 30.9 BL LOS E E - 59.9 B LOS F- ' E - 62.1 EBT W B B OS F rcs - 62.2 E 57.5 F Edina Industrial TraRc NBL LOS E Boulevard / W 78th Street Signal C 27.8 C 31.6 - NBL LOS E C 31.7 - EBL LOS F ' 32.3 EBL LOS F D 40.6 NBL LOS F - Edina Indusirlal TreRe - .- Boulevard / Molm Boulevard sans, B 11.5 B _ 14.4 B ' 11.9 ' B 122'. B -14.1 - . W 771h Street I Traffic - TH 100 SB Signal C 26.3 :C C 30.7 EBL LOSE .- C 31.0 • EBL LOS F C 31.0 W 771h SlreelI Tref6c TH 100 NB Signal C 22.1 B - B ' _r 16.9 - B .16.9 -� B 18.0 r6i. W 771h Street l Traffic Towers Site Access Signal A 5.0 A A' 5.3 A 4.6 A ' - 6.0 W 77th Street / Traffic Computer Avenue Signal. C 20.6 A A� 4.5 A 4.4 - 5.9 W 77th Street/ Tramc +E Parklawn Avenue Signal C 20.9 B 19.88 - 10.5. NBL LOS '' B 72.3 B 19.4 W 77th Street I Traffic + '. .. . Minnesota Drive/ Johnson Avenue Signal B 11.7 12.2 ^ - B 12.2 B - 12.1 -. EDT LOSE B 12.4 ' EBL. NBL. SBL LOS - Franca Avenue / Traffic E EBL, NBL LOS E Minnesota Ddvo Signal C 25.2 42.1 EB WBT LOS F D - 39.3 -FBT WBT LOS F D 39.0 EBT WBT LOS F D 40.3 EBT WBT LOS F E Bush Lake Road / Traffic FD 1-494 WO Signal 0 16.5 21.1 B' ", 10.4 B 18.2. B 19.6 E Bush Lake Road / Trallic' 1.494 EB Signal B 14.6 - B ' 16.8 - C . 26.5 " WBL LOS F D 35 :1 - WBL LOS F B 17.5 France Avenel W 78th Street' Traffic •- NBL, EBL LOS E ° - WBL; NBL LOS E _ - NBL; WBL LOS E WBI. WBT, NBL LOS 1494 WO Signal C 24.7 D 37.4 WBL WBT LOS C 25.18 - WBTLOSF C- 25.1 WBTLOSF C 36.1 F ' France Avenue / Traffic 1494 EB Signal ' C 1 21.3 NBL LOS E C 29.2 EBR LOS E D- 41.6 NBT LOS F D 41.1 '- NBT LOS F C 29.6 EBR LOS E Vddng Orive /TH 100 All Way( NB Frontage Road Slop A 5.0 - A 5.1 A "5.1 A -3.0 Computer Avenue/ All Way �r _ - -z•. _ - - Viking Drive Slop _ �'� -�- r^3'= A 6.4 - A 5.4 A 5.4 A 5.1 Frontage Road / E Lag North Hotel Access Stop Sto 4 d 33 1�• F - , -x -i- - , t A 0.5 ELEG LOS A 0.5: ELEG LOS Frontage Road I E Leg +W ` ° - j i r _ South Hotel Access !;top P °� = +...V- + - -:.. , '•.. N - s -. i. -. - -.e.. A X0.8 EG OSA A 0.8 ELEG LOS Ck 7 Novclnber 18, 2008 Page S of 9 Table 5. 1'A1 Peak Hour Lcvcl I,c. of Scnicc 2009 No BuOd Im 2009 Build Im roved 2009 - - Bulk Del Ne Im revmenla Notes Tr Ewlsl'm LOS - 2009 No Delay Bufid - Notes LOS Delay LOB Del Notes LOS 112.6 SBL LOSE . EBL, EBT, EBR WBL, WBT, NBL SBT SBR LOS F F 156.0 EBL EOT, EBR WBL, WBT, NBL SBL SBT SBR LOS F Intersection Control Traffw LOS Dela Nodes EBL, EBT, EBR, WBL WBT, NBL, SBL, SBT. SOL LOS E EBL EBT. EBR. WBL, F Franca Avenue I W 76th Street Signal C 32.2 F 177.7 SBR LOS F F 176.0 WBT SBT SBR LOS F C 30.4 C 28.4 WBL SBL LOBE Edina Industrial Traffic 'to Signal Signal C 31.8 WBL -SBL LOSE C 32.6 WBL SBL LOSE W 78th Stroel C 29.7 C 25.0 - - W BL LOS E D 45.6 EBL EBT LOS F Edina Industrial Traffic - EBR, NBT LOS E Boulevard / Signal E 56.0 EBL EBT LOS F C 26.7 Metro Boulward E 71.3 NBL, NBT, NBR. SBT SBT LOS E W 77th Street I Traffic LOS E WBL LOSE C 29.2 SBL LOSE D 53.7 NBL NBT NBR SBL LOS F TH 100 SB Signal D q8 2 EBT LOS F D 411.2 WBL SBL LOS F C 29.1 NB R LOSE NBT LOS F C 24.0 N0T LOS E - - _ - D 38.1 SBL LOS E EBL NBT NBR SBT LOS F W h Street I 77t Traffic SBL LOS E TH 100 NB Signal D 50.6 EBL LOS F D 37.4 EBL BT SBT LOS F C 20.9 A g, NBL LOSE B 13.5 EBL, SBL. SBR LOS E NBL LOS F W 77Th Street I Traffic EBL, SBR LOSE Towers Site Access Signal C 26.6 B 12.5 NBL A 9.3 W 7711 Street I Traffic Computer Avenue Signal C 23.4 B 10.1 16.5 B 16.6 B 17.5 W 77th Street I Traffw 9 Parklavm Avenue Signal C 32.4 B 18.1 C 21.8 EB WBT LOS E ED C 23.0 EBL EBT. WBL. WBT LOS E W 77th Stroel I Traffw EBL, EDT, WBL. WBT, Minnesota Ddve I Signal 29.5 C 23.1 NBL LOBE C 22.7 EBT LOSE WBL LOSE EBL WBL LOS E Johnson Av nuO C EBL, WBL. NBL LOSE EBL. WBL LOS E EBT. WBT, NBL SBL SBT. EBT, WBT, NBL, SBL SBT. France Avenue I Traffw: EBT, WBT. SBL, SBT, EDT. WBT, NBL SBL F 165.9 SBR LOS F F 168.6 SBR L Minnesota Drive Signal E 67.6 WBL LOS F F 158.5 SBR LOS F F 182.7 SBT SBR LOS F E Bush Lake Road I Traffic B 11.5 B 11.8 -B 11.9 1494 WD Signal B 11.2 B 11.7 C 22.3 C 22.2 G 21.7 E Bush Lake Road I Traffic 1-494 ED Signed C 22.2 C 21.8 35.8 BBT LOBE EBL LOS F D 42.7 EBR SBT LOB E EBL LOS F France Avenue I Traits; - - W 78th Street Signal D 41.2 EBL SBT LOSE C 33.9 SBT EBL LOSE D I 494 WB D 44 .0 C 26.6 C 28.3 C 25.7 France Avenue I Traffw 1494 ED Signal B 17.7 C 25.9 - A 4.8 100AII Way i Viking DdvelTH NB Frontage Road Slop rf.t 1�5. A 4.9 A A 4.9 56 A A 4.8 6.6 A 5.6 Computer Avenue I All Way : ?- Vikdnp Drive Step ,Y, ;.r..:.l _+ 1 - - -�'. -. A 6.6 Frontage Road I E Leg 1 ` � z - , - r r ^ � E LEG LOS A A 0.5 - - -'- E LEG LOS A North Hotel Access Slop n:.c.�2.. . >�.- •+, • -: •,.. -... ...' "9 ,; _ , ,.- - r _ --.. _ v �. -x -r A LEG LOS A � � A � 0.9 � E LEG LOS A Fr �., Sou t ) T..AIeC ♦M De..b.Li....�61..e..I:. November 18, 2008 Page 6 of PhaN 1 Bulb No hn wue L th No1n - TwOWBLT10nY• 1 L- 211200 quausad 7217200 - - 10b100 antl 9200. ' Traffic 2007 Eau' T..AIeC ♦M De..b.Li....�61..e..I:. November 18, 2008 Page 6 of PhaN 1 Bulb No hn wue L th No1n - TwOWBLT10nY• 1 L- 211200 quausad 7217200 - - 10b100 antl 9200. ' Traffic 2007 Eau' 2008 No Build 2009 No Bulltl M 2008 Phafe 1 Bud (Imp—WI (Imp—WI 2DOO Ousue Lan Nola Ouaue Len Now" Oww Len Nob" Ouaw Not- : O hdaneeeml Franca Awanwl -' Traffic.. Two WS LT IarM"- Two WB LT throe- TwoWBLT�e"- W76th SVWI Si" _. WBL•2t&200 gwuea 0111{200 WBL- 2{61100 qusuwgf112=0 WBL - 2371200 queue of 1oa200• WB WEIR - 101100 OW 00 W R -1291100 66200 - W R -11 100 Md 37200 WEIR Edna Indwtnel - 1 •- Boulevard I Tralfio I - - .. , W 78th Streal. NBL - 367280 - NEIL - 346MB0 NEIL - 353280 Edina trdu l" Traffic Sdilh —dI M.I. Boulevad - .. W T7th Seed I TuRm' .. .. "7H 100 S8' Siprul W 77th Strad I Tmft '. TH 100 NB sow, ' W 77th Str"el I ' Tn10c Town Blue Acu"" SIprW - W 77th Sbvai I Traffic Compwa Avanw. SiprW. W 77th St,"I Tnf6c .. - ,iParMlswnAvamu SiVW - .. W 77th Strew I Traffic Mimeaola Dnw I Sgr1d - - . JolDaui Avanw - - France Avarua I Trifc Mtrmmab Ddw Si&1W . -• ... .. �r :- NBL. 8 t0 NB - 792{0 E Bush Lafr. Row I TrdBC 1494 WB 'S" E Bwh Lek. Raw / Trelfic:.' - N9t EB SIpiW- '- Frailty Avanw I Tre01C W 78th Street / 1 Si&W - . FranceA —/ Tnf1k - 1 - 139" ES Si�W - r - it rr�.1 - 1,• ,VMQ Ddw I TH 700 NS Fronbpe Rad., AO W.;' - SIoP - Cgmpuls A anus l.: AO Wry . VAilp Dtlw Stw Frcnbps Row! E Log ": it n »• i - { 'iY:i7 1' a.! - Noah Hold Aci a y ` 1� �. 1 • 7 J S� Y .Slop :1 ... F.. FIr 1r� Frontage Rod 1. EL�p 7j. South Hold Aco " I Slop b i 11' %t '. %-' I ° ! .:; •fit 17 VAb Drivels 8 N L9 'l ♦ t t' -t t_ : ': 1 F'LL 'i reran sue Acm. sing ComY M A sew I W Lsp EeD RanP 'stop t a L ! S r "S;, .+5,. A. , ' ^tit f j - 4 L ; `"• 5 *I F 'jj Weft Serdor Acuaf Stop ! f I 1 4 �� l W 77th Strad /' 4 N L,p FJm SerwrAmeei- ..Slop 1 Role 1. r1.7 r.— nvu. T MfC IMMetlim Contrd Fra— Avenue I TrMOc W 76th SV644 SipnW' Edina Industrial Traft 5w 1.nud I Signal W 76th Strae Edvu thdicbld Tr ft BoulwtldI SOW Maw bveN W nth Sae.! I TmH¢ TH 100 SO SipnM W 77th Street I , TnetBc TH 108 NO Signal W 771h S"d I Traffic Toves Sale A—a SyW W 77th SVSM I T CMapuls Awrse Sp W 77th Spam I Traft P.,klsam A— S' W T71h SkdI T Lr.e t. Oriw I Johhean Avenue Frems A— I T I6trmeeola OrNS - • E Bush leas Road / T 1494 WE SIB E Bush LMs Rud I T 1494 EB 5 Francs A-1 T W 76th SVW f SiE 1494 WE Francs Awwe I T 1494 EB Sig LSalrlg Di. I TH 101 A0 NO Fmrdpe Road St. Computer Awru.I M Viking Odw S F—t.ge Roe l I E Noel HOW Acca® S .. Fr Hoi Rolls E Swth Halel A=ss 51 ucu ' 2007 EdM 009 No Bu1N 2008 Ne Buitl veal " We rroee vwa ., �A.. - - -• - -- - -- - Nvles Ouwa Ih Nob. Ouse Lan Noln 0uwe Lan NMn Duets Lsn NMaa Ouwe Len EBR- 280200 ESL- 2d22= EBL - 2851130 EBR - 35"240 EBL- 251200 WBL- 25D200 Teo EB LT lath- EBR- 365240 T— EBLTtan ®- EBR -357201 Teo EB LT imin• EBR - 36024" TwoEBLTlann- WBL•271200 queue of 1413200 WBL- 231200 pawn 01757200 WBL - 23720" queuesd 1501701 WBL -278200 gtieuni.M 161201 SBL- 6131460 antl2B 00• wB - 263200 eMS12= WBL -260 DO erld2d72= WBL- 261200 amzfifinpD EST - 653468 EST 6 EBTR queue ESTR - peal upsVesn NOR • 2621200 5411468 int. rmc5m. NOR • 7112 . EBL - 431!515 EBL - 4251335 EBL - 4111335 1. - 109 L - 107/70 rMBC. .. .. Signal - Ip^M rMBe SIyW EEL - 263200 WOL- 4051400 WE -4039W EBL - 2491200 SBL- 2791150 - 613L•2171150 SBL - 2301150' SOL- 2271150 6BT -148 &1276 SET. 155717215 relic SBT- 158711275 SOT - 1517/1215 SBT- 74637216 SBT- 15431215 Sprml _ SBT - 756011215 SBT• 150911215 SET - 75701/215 - SOT queue p••l SET - 151811215 SBT quwa. past SET - 14831215 SET queue pall SET - 157711215 SET queue p.M SBT - 10941300 upstream SOT. 5761121! upsream SST- 153011215 tgMV.— SBT- 107618= up.VSam WBL -S101400 SBR- 1164wo inlseedbn. SBR- 11871800 inlanecl'em SBR- 1122MOD Insr.¢t'uro SBR•1t33IWD inlenacluro relfie ,. nM ral8c , Iprel rates 6BT - 51]1!86 SBT•4531JBB SET •463]88 - SET - 5091388 r. SBT- 49H3BB SOT quwn past SET •52SWO SET queues pnl SET 5141386 SET queue pM SBT - 5"11388 SET paean pall rot SET - 444288 uPWeam SST -471MO upat— EST - 4671!88 upstream SET - 4551388 wnanarn .SBT - 4681786 inles bursa SET - 4551788 intsndions SET - 4941388 msr. . BT- 4721386 inbrsectioro nW rMBC , Wayfiit � L. November 18, 3008 Page 7 of 9 � �S0 .�ur"i F t' `.y Y-t Y }.,ij lyJLII ...7 +'-1 : °oB...k 7 � �S0 November 18, 2008 Page 8 of 9 6. Section 6.3, 2009 Phase I Build Operations, included a reference to. the signal timing optimization that was conducted to accommodate traffic growth and pattern changes. Similar to comment no. 5, was this included prior to the addition of the development traffic? Yes. See response to comment 5. 7. Section 6.3, 2009 Phase 1 Build Operations, the last paragraph indicates that the same issues occur in both Phase 1, no -build recommended and build conditions. Earlier in the text, it was indicated that the no -build recommended improvements identified were assumed as part of the build analysis. If this is a correct statement, it should be clarified All improvements identified in the No Build analysis were assumed to be inplace as part of the Build analysis. The last paragraph should be clarified to state that only the operations issues that were unmitigated along France Avenue still occur in the Phase 1 Build scenario. 8. Section 6.5, Parking Supply and Operations, more clarfication should be given to how the parking spaces meet City code. This issue will be discussed more with the Planning Commission and City staff. The existing Pentagon Towers site does not meet Edina City code in terms of the number of spaces provided, however, there is no current parking shortage on the site due at least in part to the current occupancy rate of 66.5 percent. Current Edina City Code would require 711 spaces for the existing buildings that total 168,496 square feet as compared to the 626 spaces currently provided. During the demolition and construction phases, City Code would require 632 spaces based on the 146,506 square feet remaining, compared to the 587 spaces that would be available. Similar to the existing condition, factoring the required number of spaces by the occupancy rate, only 420 spaces would be expected to be needed and no parking shortage would be expected. Upon completion of the hotel, a total of 655 parking spaces will be provided. City Code requires 170 spaces for the hotel and 632 spaces for the office, for a total of 802 spaces. Again, the office uses would be expected to generate a significantly lower parking demand compared to that calculated using City Code due in part to the occupancy rates on the site. Further, the hotel and office are compatible uses for shared parking because the peak time for parking at the office would be the off-peak for parking at the hotel and vise versa. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) shared parking calculation results in a maximum parking demand of 634 spaces on the site, which is less than the 655 parking spaces provided. Based on the overall occupancy on the site and the ability for the office and hotel to share parking, no parking shortages are expected, even though the site does not meet City Code in terms of the total number of parking spaces provided. Pq November 18, 2008 Page 9 of 9 9. Section 7. 0, Transit Facilities, a discussion on how hotel employees would have an oppa9unity to use transit should be included. Transit is available to all current and future users of the site, as there are bus stops located near the W 77b Street/Computer Avenue intersection. 10. Section 8. 0, Pedestrians and Bicycle Facilities, a reference to a new sidewalk on the east side of the TH 100 north frontage road is made. It should be clarified how this sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk system and the actual terminus of the new sidewalk. New sidewalk will be constructed along the TH 100 NB frontage road from the south hotel access and-extending north to connect to the existing sidewalk in the southeast quadrant of the W 77`h Street/TH 100 NB intersection. H. Section 9.0,-Travel Demand Management, a third bullet point should be included indicating that the developer will provide access to transit through sidewalk connections to 77r" Street. Comment noted. Improved access to the bus stops on W 77�' Street will be accomplished through the new sidewalk to be constructed on the site and along the TH 100 NB frontage road, as described in the response to comment 10. 12. All figures should show an outline of the proposed Phase I development. Following a discussion with the City of Edina, it was determined that the figures would not be modified 13. Figure A2 -3 Phase 1 site plan should include a legend or be more clearly defined on what is in place and what is new as part of the proposed development. Following a discussion with the City of Edina, it was determined that the figure would not be modified 14. Figures A54 and A5 -5 indicate the no -build and build -lane geometry and indication of the changes between each of these should be indicated or these figures should be combined if there is no change between them. Figure A6 illustrates the differences between the No Build and No Build Improved lane geometrics and would illustrate the difference between the No Build Improved and Build Improved lane geometrics, if there were any. In this case, the geometrics are the same in the No Build Improved and the Build scenarios, as there were no recommended improvements based on the Build analysis. The geometrics shown in Figures A54 and A5 -5 are consistent with the format of those included in the Overall Development Plan. K a Plan Recommendations: Route Network The City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan 4 W' . - AW - Source: City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, 2007. FIGURE A8 BICYCLE FACILITIES 0- LEGEND �PWAQ—LKJIL abow TACL FV MINUTES OF THE � Edina Transportation Commission o e Thursday, November 20, 2008 o Edina City Hall v �y 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Les Wanninger, Paul Mooty, Warren Plante, Steve Brown, Geof Workinger, Tom Bonneville, Jennifer Janovy, Julie Sierks MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean White, Marc Usem, STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by chair Workinger. II. Comments a. Chairman Comments Chair Workinger asked Commissioner Brown to- give an update on the Greater Cornelia Area/ West 70th Street Traffic Study.' Commissioner Brown explained that at the Study Advisory Meeting of November 6, they had excellent feedback from the consultant and residents with over 50% of them returning their survey. He said they decided to hold off their recommendation to the ETC dntil January so that they can gather more information on roundabouts, which the consultant will present at the next SAC meeting (December 15). He said they expect to have a recommendation for the Council and ETC by January. b. Public Comments None., III. Old Business None. IV. New Business a. Aloft Edina Hotel — 77th and Hwy. 100 Assistant City Engineer Sullivan explained that the proposed Aloft Edina Hotel is to be built on a site that currently has five buildings. He said this proposal is part of a larger re- development that extends from Parklawn Avenue to the east to Hwy. 100 to the west and from the Fred Richards Golf Course to the north to W. 77th Street to the south. He said discussion regarding re- development of the site began in 2007 and a required AUAR study ensued in a 3 -step process. Preliminary approval was granted on November 15, 2007, and overall approval on December 21, 2007. Mr. Sullivan said the re- development of the site will be done over a 10- year period and this final step in the approval process is specifically for the proposed hotel site at W. 77th St. and Hwy. 100. kY f. Mr. Sullivan said the traffic study completed by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., showed that trip generation will decrease by 168 and increase by 1,226 with the 150 -room hotel; however, the A.M. peak trips are expected to be only 54, while the P.M. peak will be 69 trips, and these he said, are not significant increases. Also, the Southeast Edina Synchro model was used to check the traffic study and additionally, the City is entering into a developer's agreement to put in writing many of the infrastructure needs created by the overall development. Mr. Sullivan said staff and the City's traffic consultant, Chuck Rickart of WSB, are in agreement that the traffic study fully addresses their concerns with the - site. Additionally, he said intersection or site modification that is typically done to mitigate traffic is not the developer's responsibility in this instance due to the distance of the issue area to the developer's site, but rather the responsibility of the City and County. Furthermore, the developer will be making significant infrastructure improvements as the development progress over the next 10 years. The following issues and /or questions were raised during discussion: • Has any consideration been given to a right turn ramp coming off Hwy. 100 going on to W. 77 Street? Mr. Sullivan said Mn /DOT has conceptual long term plans for the area, but it does not include a right turn ramp. • Traffic distribution of 1226 trips- and 59 peak were determined using the ITE's trip generation based on studies of similar used sites where peaking for a hotel is probably later in the mornings and evenings. • Developments in the City of Bloomington that could impact traffic in Edina were taken in consideration including the Burgundy Place and Ryan Office in its third phase. The AUAR Study accounted for these and other traffic impacts out to the year 2020. • The intersection at W. 77th Street and the northbound Hwy. 100 on -ramp will need a second right, turn lane in the future and the developer is required to set aside right -of- way for this purpose. Preliminary plans are underway for the right -of -way dedication. • Are improvements to Hwy. 100 and W. 77th Street being piecemealed? Due to limited funding, the work has to be spread out; however, all improvements by the developer as well 'as the City, will be completed before the site opens. If the improvements are not made, the levels of service will remain as it is today, even with the additional cars. • Chris Hickok, Wayzata Properties, said the anticipated building start date is next spring and the process should take 12 months. • It appears the levels of service will decrease overtime at W. 78th Street and France. This is an intersection that was identified as needing improvements and it is expected that levels of service will decrease overtime even without the hotel. Mn /DOT, Bloomington and Edina is responsible for W. 78th Street and will work together to make improvements. • JoNette Kuhnau, Kimley -Horn Associates, Inc. said the overall development plan includes intersection improvements as each incremental phase is done as part of the developer's agreement. Commissioner Wanninger moved to accept staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown. Commissioner Janovy asked that part of the last sentence of staffs recommendation be struck or a qualifier added because she is not certain what levels of service they will have in the 2 g5.- 4 A future even though they were told that the levels of service will not change. The sentence reads `...and that the transportation system is not adversely affected by this development.' The following will be added: `...that the various modeling done by staff, consultant and developer indicated that the transportation system is not adversely affected by this development.' Staffs recommendation is a follows: If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the development application has satisfied the staff and WSB review memorandums and that the "Phase 1 Final Development Plan — Aloft Edina Hotel" Transportation Impact Analysis is within the parameters set forth in the AUAR Study, Preliminary Development Plan and Overall Development Plan and that the various modeling done by staff, consultant and developer indicated that the transportation system is not adversely affected by this development. All voted aye. Motion passed. V. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of September 18, 2008 Commissioner Wanninger moved to approve the minutes of September 18, 2008. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown. All voted aye. Motion passed. Commissioner Wanninger said he recalls a discussion regarding SAC minutes being distributed. Mr. Sullivan will look into this. Commissioner Janovy said important discussion took place about the YMCA that was not included in the minutes "and suggested that key points should be included. Commissioner Workinger concurred,: Commissioner Workinger noted "that Appendix A -8 was missing from the Phase 1 Final Development Plan for the Aloft Edina Hotel. He requested that a copy be distributed to them and that the Planning Commission review this page. VI. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Brown) VII. Open Discussion None VIII. Staff Liaison Comments (Sullivan) Meeting adjourned. 3 Aq Recommendation: Follow the administrative penalty matrix for the sale of an alcoholic beverage to an under -age person. This is Chuck E. Cheese's second violation within 24 months, which calls for a $1000.00 fine and to suspend their liquor license for three days. Info/Background: On 11 -25 -2008 a letter was mailed to all public establishments that serve alcohol in the City of Edina informing them of upcoming alcohol compliance inspections. The letter specifically states "We have had previous violations where the server has looked at the under 21 license and still served the underage person". A packet of sample "under 21" licenses, along with descriptors of how to read the licenses, was included in the packet. A copy of the letter is attached. The Edina Police Department conducted liquor compliance checks on December 17, 2008. Two plainclothes police officers approached the service counter with the 20 year -old male decoy. One of the police officers ordered a pizza and the other ordered a beer. The cashier then summoned a manager to complete the liquor sale. The manager asked if all three of them planned on drinking and they all replied "yes ". He then asked all three for ID's, which they presented, including the decoys license which stated he was under 21. While the employee was looking at all three licenses, he asked if all were over 21. One officer responded "Yes" paused and said "I am'. The manager told the group, "I know that the undercover cops cant he about that sort of thing. He looked at all three licenses, handed them back and poured three beers for them. This violation was consistent with the example given in the notification alerting them of the upcoming inspection. The protocol for the checks is straightforward with no attempts to hide the decoys age. The inspections are performed to ensure that our establishments are compliant with city ordinances and state statutes. They are not intended as a way for establishments to try and REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II .C. From: Jeff Long, Dep. Police Chief Consent Information Only Date:, February 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA ® To Council Subject: Appeal of Administrative Penalty - Chuck E. Cheese Action F] Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Follow the administrative penalty matrix for the sale of an alcoholic beverage to an under -age person. This is Chuck E. Cheese's second violation within 24 months, which calls for a $1000.00 fine and to suspend their liquor license for three days. Info/Background: On 11 -25 -2008 a letter was mailed to all public establishments that serve alcohol in the City of Edina informing them of upcoming alcohol compliance inspections. The letter specifically states "We have had previous violations where the server has looked at the under 21 license and still served the underage person". A packet of sample "under 21" licenses, along with descriptors of how to read the licenses, was included in the packet. A copy of the letter is attached. The Edina Police Department conducted liquor compliance checks on December 17, 2008. Two plainclothes police officers approached the service counter with the 20 year -old male decoy. One of the police officers ordered a pizza and the other ordered a beer. The cashier then summoned a manager to complete the liquor sale. The manager asked if all three of them planned on drinking and they all replied "yes ". He then asked all three for ID's, which they presented, including the decoys license which stated he was under 21. While the employee was looking at all three licenses, he asked if all were over 21. One officer responded "Yes" paused and said "I am'. The manager told the group, "I know that the undercover cops cant he about that sort of thing. He looked at all three licenses, handed them back and poured three beers for them. This violation was consistent with the example given in the notification alerting them of the upcoming inspection. The protocol for the checks is straightforward with no attempts to hide the decoys age. The inspections are performed to ensure that our establishments are compliant with city ordinances and state statutes. They are not intended as a way for establishments to try and outwit the police department by simply asking them a question because they know that the "undercover cops cant he about that sort of thing ". It is our experience that underage drinkers will he in order to obtain alcohol and it is important that managers actually look at the license given to them. This is Chuck E. Cheese's second violation in less than twenty -four months, with the last violation occurring on 05/16/07. In addition to the administrative fine, the server has been charged with a gross misdemeanor violation of Furnishing Alcohol to a Person Under 21 years old. Chuck E. Cheese will not be eligible for the reduction in the annual license fee for successfully passing compliance checks. Section 900.07 of the City Code states that businesses that pass the annual compliance checks shall be eligible for an annual license fee reduction of $500.00, up to a maximum of $1000.00 for two consecutive years with no violations. A copy of the penalty matrix is attached. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-08 DENYING APPEAL ON SELLING OR FURNISHING ALCOHOL TO AN UNDERAGE PERSON Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 On December 17, 2008, a manager was issued a citation for serving alcohol to an underage person at the Chuck E. Cheese restaurant, 7505 France Ave. 1.02 The manager asked for identification from the police decoy, which showed that the decoy was under 21 years old. 1.03 The manager asked if everyone in the decoys group was over 21 years old and indicated, " I know that undercover cops can't he about that sort of thing." 1.04 The driver licenses were handed back to the group, including the "under 21" drivers license. The manager then served the beer. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 An employee of Chuck E. Cheese did serve alcohol to an individual under 21 years old. 2.02 A driver's license was presented showing that one of the people he was serving was under 21 years old. 2.03 Serving alcohol to a minor is a gross misdemeanor violation of state statute 340A.503. 2.04 State Statue 340A.415 addresses the civil penalty relating to this violation. 2.05 Edina City Ordinance 900.15 adopts statute 340A.415 as part of the Edina City Code. 2.06 Edina has a penalty matrix for violation which is in compliance with the guidelines set by State Statute and City Code. 2.07 Chuck E. Cheese has one prior violation on 05/16/07. Because this is their second violation they must pay a $1000.00 fine and have their liquor license suspended for three days. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the Appeal of Administrative the Penalty for Chuck E. Cheese and upholds the penalty of $1000.00 and a liquor license suspension of three days. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on February 3, 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 3, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009. City Clerk LIQUOR AND WINE VIOLATIONS ENFORCEMENT SCHEDULE PURPOSE Develop an enforcement schedule to insure a swift and consistent response to violations of City Code 900. To insure immediate criminal court referral for individuals and administrative penalties for license holders in response to violations occurring in establishments licensed to sell alcoholic beverages. POLICY STATEMENT A dual response system will be used for the purposed of establishing enforcement response for violations of all State Statutes and City Codes occurring in and near licensed establishments. Criminal enforcement against an individual will not bar or delay administrative action against a license holder. CRIMINAL RESPONSE: Officers observing criminal activity in or around licensed establishments will take direct enforcement action against responsible individuals in accordance with State law, City Code and Department policy. This enforcement action may include court referral by citation, formal complaint process, or arrest. In all cases a report shall be completed which includes the relationship of the violation to -the operation of the establishment, the manger responsible for the licensed establishment, the manager's response to officer's notification of the violation, and the manager's attitude. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE: Administrative action will be taken against license holders for violations of State Statute or City Code in accordance with the following presumptive penalty. matrix. The Administrative penalty shall be determined on the basis of the history of violations for the preceding (24) month period. Re- inspection will occur within 60 days following a violation. TYPE OF VIOLATION 1st vio. 2nd vio. 3rd vio. 4th vio. 1. Commission of a felony Revocation NA NA NA related to,the licensed v activity 2. Sale of alcoholic Revocation NA NA NA beverages while license is under suspension 3. Adult Entertainment Revocation NA NA NA 4. Sale of Intoxicating liquor Revocation NA NA NA where only license if for 3.2 percent malt liquor Adopted By Edina City Council May 3, 1999 TYPE OF VIOLATION 1st vio 2nd vio. 3rd vio. 4th vio. 5. Refusal to allow City, $1,000 Fine $2,000. Fine Revocation NA inspectors or Police 3 day 7 day admission to inspect Suspension Suspension premises 6. Sale of alcoholic $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation beverages to under -age 3 day 7 day person Suspension Suspension 7. After /before hours sale $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation of alcoholic beverage 3 day 7 day Suspension Suspension 8. After hours consumption $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation of alcoholic beverages 3 day 7 day Suspension Suspension 9. Illegal gambling or $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation prostitution on premises 3 day 7 day Suspension Suspension 10. Failure to take reasonable $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation steps to stop person from 3 day 7 day leaving premises with , Suspension Suspension alcoholic beverages 11. Sale of alcoholic $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation beverages to obviously 3 day 7 day intoxicated person Suspension Suspension 12. Allowing disorderly $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation establishment 3 day 7 day Suspension Suspension 13. Person under 18 serving $500.00 Fine $1,000 Fine $2,000 Fine Revocation liquor 3 day 7 day, Suspension. Suspension 14. No licensed manager on $250 Fine $500.00 Fine $1,500.00 Fine Revocation premises 1 day 7 day Edina Code modified to drop suspension suspension requirement for licensed mangers. 15. Failure to display liquor Warning Letter $500.00 Fine $1,000.00 Fine $1,500.00 Fine license 16. Warning signs not Warning Letter $500.00 Fine $1,000.00 Fine $1,500.00 Fief displayed Adopted By Edina City Council May 3, 1999 o e � A. �y City of Edina Chief Michael J. Siitari December, 2008 Edina Police Department Notice of Alcohol Compliance Inspections To: Managers of all Edina establishments licensed to sell alcoholic beverages During the next 60 days, the Edina Police Department will be conducting alcohol compliance inspections in all public establishments licensed to sell alcoholic beverages in the city of Edina. The police department is mandated by the city council to conduct more than one such inspection per calendar year., Plainclothes police officers, along with persons under 21 years of age, will enter each establishment and order or attempt to purchase alcoholic beverages. We are trying to . ensure that all wait staff and sales clerks are checking IDs and refusing sales to persons under 21. Please review your Alcohol Service policy with your employees. Remember, persons under 24 will have a Minnesota driver license or ID card that bears a black stripe across the top with the words "under 21" embossed on the card. The adult (over 21) driver license bears a red stripe across the top. We have had previous violations where the server has looked at the under 21 license and still served the underage person. Along with service of alcohol to persons under 21, officers will be checking for other . compliance issues, such as: • Current liquor, beer & wine, or 3.2 beer license prominently displayed • State of MN placard outlining warnings to pregnant women and criminal penalties for DWI • Persons in possession of or consuming alcoholic beverages outside the physical boundaries of the licensed establishment • Service of alcoholic beverages to obviously intoxicated persons The mission of the police department's inspection program is to provide verification to the city council that Edina's liquor ordinance is being observed, so that the citizens can in turn be assured that the youth of our city will not have access to alcohol through restaurants and stores in Edina. We would like to be able to report to the council that we had no violations during this upcoming inspection period. We hope this notification is helpful in reducing the number of violations. Please feel free to call me or-our alcohol /tobacco compliance officer, Sgt. Scott Kuyper (952/833- 9536), with any questions or concerns. Edina Police Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Fax (952) 826 -1607 Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 55424 -1394 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Drivers' Licenses and Identification Cards Effective December 15, 2004 DRIVER'S LI Standard Driver's License INSTRUCTION RUCTION Vr:RrAT —,z 1.7 IL GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 o.t..ralnh 05.22 -1984 5.. Ey-e CU.. F BLU IP Hight Might DONOR 0 5 -08 150 ISSUED 11.2093EiIPIREs 11- 11.2004 D616603235374 Instruction Permit GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE ' 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 d !� Da. ntBirth Oi- 22.1950 '' l 3- Ey.s C" - Vz F BLU D 3• H-lght W.gM I� DAIS DONOR ' ISSUED 11.20-33�N1WMEN ".i 7 Cj F BLU ID D616603235374 teght weight DONOR ❑M _ -03 150 Standard Driver's License INSTRUCTION RUCTION Vr:RrAT —,z 1.7 IL GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 o.t..ralnh 05.22 -1984 5.. Ey-e CU.. F BLU IP Hight Might DONOR 0 5 -08 150 ISSUED 11.2093EiIPIREs 11- 11.2004 D616603235374 Instruction Permit Identification Card HAUESOTA DRIVER'S LICENSE IDENTIFICATION CARD NOT A DRIVER'S LICEWFE GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST H ' •. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 DAIS oee.tairth 05.22 -1958 S.. EY.. CWS Cj F BLU ID �i _ R' teght weight DONOR ❑M _ -03 150 t; ISSUED 11.2003 EEmus 05.22.2007 " 'r D616603235374 Identification Card Standard Commercial Driver's License - DRIVER'S LICENSE, GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE -_ -✓ 123 MAN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Did. m BIM 0 5- 22.1904 S-. Ey-s V. F BLU 0 H.Ight W.ght DONOR M 5 -03 150 Issum 11 -2003 E%PIREA "-2M, W66032353T4 Under 21 Standard Driver's License . - RIVER'S LICENSE PPOVI' >1n71i1L ELIZABETH SAMPLE .IN STREET NORTHWEST 4POLIS, MN 12345 -0000 IM05.22 -1987 AGEuOS- 22.2005 Eyes CI... BLU D Might ❑ 150 11 -2003 EXPIRES 11- 11.2005 Under 18 Provisional Driver's License - IDENTIFICATION CARD, 140T A DRIVER'S LICF115F GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE - 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345-0000 Da1e.1 BIM 05.22 -1984 Se. Ey.s Clae. F BLU ID f.. Height weight DONOR 0 �.> 5 -00 150 ISSUED �111� -22000,y3 o Exa.IyREs 05 -22 -2005 Under 21 Identification Card N'4580 MOTORIZED BICYCLE''- GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345-0000 OM.rBlrth 05- 22.1984 S.. Ey-s this F BLU IAB Height weight DONOR 5 -03 150 ISSUED 11 -2003 Emma 05. 224005 Under 21 Motorized Bicycle Permit rt �Kn)er-h,�Vl',Aervlces HAUESOTA DRIVER'S LICENSE , COMMERCIAL GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLEV 1I3 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 DAIS Date wBinh 05.22.1958 S.. Ey.s CI... Cj F BLU B qt Height wd0M DONOR t; t-03 ISO - ISSUED 11.2003 05.22.2007 D616603235374 Standard Commercial Driver's License - DRIVER'S LICENSE, GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE -_ -✓ 123 MAN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Did. m BIM 0 5- 22.1904 S-. Ey-s V. F BLU 0 H.Ight W.ght DONOR M 5 -03 150 Issum 11 -2003 E%PIREA "-2M, W66032353T4 Under 21 Standard Driver's License . - RIVER'S LICENSE PPOVI' >1n71i1L ELIZABETH SAMPLE .IN STREET NORTHWEST 4POLIS, MN 12345 -0000 IM05.22 -1987 AGEuOS- 22.2005 Eyes CI... BLU D Might ❑ 150 11 -2003 EXPIRES 11- 11.2005 Under 18 Provisional Driver's License - IDENTIFICATION CARD, 140T A DRIVER'S LICF115F GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE - 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345-0000 Da1e.1 BIM 05.22 -1984 Se. Ey.s Clae. F BLU ID f.. Height weight DONOR 0 �.> 5 -00 150 ISSUED �111� -22000,y3 o Exa.IyREs 05 -22 -2005 Under 21 Identification Card N'4580 MOTORIZED BICYCLE''- GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345-0000 OM.rBlrth 05- 22.1984 S.. Ey-s this F BLU IAB Height weight DONOR 5 -03 150 ISSUED 11 -2003 Emma 05. 224005 Under 21 Motorized Bicycle Permit rt �Kn)er-h,�Vl',Aervlces Macro printing Type of card (Minnesota) `) Under 21 1VI1 N ICE T . Digital image with DRIVER'S LiCEMSE fine line printing fAriE ELIZABETH SAMPLE ' w MN STREET NORTHWEST MENWOLM MN 113454000 "deb .03.22 -1951 - k - ham• chi.. Printed card number F aw, O "M''r' ';�';"' ooaoa O rsuED 11-2003 Exp au 05.22.2007 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST mrUS CaEM �%� .ss.•zaa Donor designation Standard Driver's License Status Check — (when appropriate) Rainbow print pattern Under 21 ' DRIVE LICENSE GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12US -000D Indicators, a -'b or. wainh05.22 -1987 AoE f.Oi -22 -2005 s.. Ey.. cla. when appropriate �' 1' Ighl Wdyh. ° M (see next column) 5 C0 151 • 0616603235374 ISsum 11-2003 LU 1L11.2005 Under 21 Provisional Driver's License 18th Birthday indicator (when appropriate) Magnetic Stripe 1 D Barcode (contains all the data (contains license number) on the front of the card) Cardholder- specific 0"s.-m..A... information (Endorsements /Restrictions) �.�.�� IO r «. L.. LVWIINCMR aCER. t iiiP.SM3. 49,.5 ruaw u..•. wiwn..u.v'..ioi`.mn .. r� Living Will /Healthcare Back of Standard Driver's License Directive, Firearm Safety and Snowmobile 2D Barcode Status Check Safety indicators (contains full name, date (when appropriate) (when appropriate) of birth and card number) Retroreflective (' Virtual Image i L1 3M Confirm Laminate (LadySlipper flower repeated) Virtual Image in Laminate ■ Each card is the size and shape of a standard credit card but is more flexible and has a somewhat different texture. ■ On the front of the card, a virtual image of a loon appears to float above or sink below the surface as the viewing angle changes. 13 A digital image of the cardholder is fused with heat into the card plastic. Fine line printing over the image reveals tampering attempts. The image always appears on the left. c1 A red border around the image indicates "Under 21." ■ If the cardholder is under 18, date of 18th birthday appears in red. "Status Check" indicates a temporary visitor to the United States and the date the cardholder's authorized presence in this country is expected to end. Information, including restrictions and endorse- ments, is specific to each cardholder. n A holographic state seal that appears on the front of the card is visible only under ultraviolet light. 13 Indicators on front of card: AQ Metro Mobility T] Senior Citizen Public Transit Reduced Fare © Limited Mobility MQ Medical Alert © Standby or Temporary Custodian Minnesota Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 www.mndriveinfo.org DRIVER'S_LICEN3k TitEVOR DOUGLAS TUINENGA EDINA, MN 55343: ' ✓ Date of Birth � AGE 18� Sex Eyes Class - M BRN D Height Weight - 5-9 160 DONOR ' ISSUED 12 -2006 EXPIRES P006119940206 � \� TO: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council FROM: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: February 3, 2009 AGENDA ITEM. IV A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Type III Ambulance Remount Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. North Central Ambulance 1. $105,990.37 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: North Central Ambulance $105,990.37 GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid is to remount a new Ford E350 chassis onto the Fire Department's 1994 Type -III Braun ambulance, add additional storage space and completely refurbish the vehicle. This is the second remount of this vehicle. This project would be accomplished with Fire Department Equipment Replacement funds. The remounting saves approximately $50,000 compared to the purchase of a new ambulance. The vehicle would be on a six -year replacement schedule. The bid by North Central Ambulance meets the Fire Department's bid specifications. North Central Ambulance has done outstanding work remounting three previous chassises on ambulances of ours. North Central Ambulance is Quality Vehicle Modifiers (QVM) certified by Ford Motor Co., which would keep valid all warranties by Ford Motor Company. Three other companies, were interested in the project, but did not bid because they were not certified by Braun to remount ambulance patient modules and would void -our lifetime warranty on the Braun Ambulance Patient Module,(not acceptable). North Central Ambulance is certified by Braun to remount the Patient Module. My research indicates that this is a very good bid price for the work being performed. I recommend that we award the bid to North Central Ambulance. re The. Recommended Bid is Within budget �- Fire Department not within budget ohn allin, Finance Director Gordon Hughe , Ci Manager o e o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE • fN�bRPOR%'Sg9 • eee TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 February 3, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2009 Chevrolet Silverado One Ton Pickup Truck — Braemar Arena DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED: BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION NA DATE: December 30, 2009 Company Car/Truck City (State of Minnesota Contract #440137) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Car /Truck City $21,580.00 Amount of Quote or Bid $21,580.00 ACCOUNT #: 5510.1740 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a one -ton 2009 Chevrolet Silverado model 3500 4x4 regular cab pickup truck for Braemar Arena. The primary purpose of this purchase is to provide the Public Works and Braemar Golf Course assistance with plowing responsibilities during the Arena's busiest season. This truck will also be used to haul equipment and supplies for Braemar Arena as well as assist with a variety of other outdoor maintenance tasks. This is a 2009 Capital Improvement Plan item previously approved by City Council on January 20, 2009, and budgeted at $26,000.00. The plow attachments will be purchased at a later date at a price within the CIP budget amount. John Ke ri s, Director This Recommended bid is: within burdizet Edina Park and Recreation Department Jolfn Wallin, Finance Director y Manager �r i NA, �1lrL,� O E Cn �o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE roR�eRA TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 February 3, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: IV. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Pamela Park Playground Equipment DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED: BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE: January 29, 2009 February 28, 2009 Company Amount of Ouote or Bid 1. Power Play LT Farmington, Inc. 1. $150,000.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: ACCOUNT #: Power Play LT Farmington, Inc. 47063.6710 GENERAL INFORMATION: On Thursday, January 29, 2009, bids were opened for the purchase and installation of replacement playground equipment at Pamela Park per specifications. Assistant Director, Ed MacHolda, worked closely with a Pamela Park neighborhood committee in selecting the playground equipment and design. The committee visited several playground sites, viewed catalogs from various playground equipment vendors, and received presentations from three different playground equipment vendors to present their best plans that had to be within the 2009 CIP City Council approved budget figure of $150,000. The committee chose Little Tikes Kidbuilders Playground Equipment (owned by Power Play LT Farmington, Inc.) as the preferred style of playground equipment, which is the same style and brand playground equipment purchased and installed at McGuire Park last year. The playground equipment plan is designed to meet the needs of children age's two to 12. As shown on the attached plan sketch, some of the equipment and amenities chosen by the neighborhood committee includes swings, slides, climbers, tire swing and spring toy, accessible digger, sand box, as well as, two picnic tables with a Funbrella shade structure. The committee also chose a wood fiber style of safety surface with new concrete aprons that are accessible and meet ADA requirements. Park Maintenance staff will remove and dispose of the old playground equipment, which was purchased and installed in 1990. Other general contractors had an opportunity to submit a bid for this job; however, only three companies chose to purchase specifications and only one chose to submit a bid. In our attempts to solicit other gene contractors to submit a bid prior to the bid opening, they informed us that they did not feel they could be competitive and therefore chose not to bid. Based on our analysis and comparing the plan to other vendor's plans submitted during the committee process, we are confident that we have received a good value bid, product and plan at a competitive price. If approved by the City Council, the new Pamela Park playground equipment will be installed no later than August 1, 2009. John Ke ri s, Director This Recommended bid is X Edina Park and Recreation Department within budget not within budget Hughes, rector v 20' FUNBRELLA PAD Tmm WC ma" y AO O C OM ID 4. IMG YLAi>IKUI,IUKGIJJ MGG1b IMG PERFORMANCE AND SAFETY REQUIREM NTS mwm ,m v o OF ASTM FOR CHILDREN. mm at m to 5. THE AMERICANS NTH DISABILITIES AC (AD A MW 0M MAY REQUIRE THAT YOU MAKE YOUR 31ARX , AND /OR PLAYGROUND ACCESSIBLE WH EN \ VIEWED IN ITS ENTIRITY: .omio won as.ao AM CLOM ._J a o' my —II A&9%Vft- f OMAD� AW / pamm om m � °'r°' a'w°°`aa � _ -� --- --- i '♦ J OOH MAT I j ♦. i ♦ �aa � m wrAero �. 'e MAPLE p .r. 0 r rloic" rnIreom mr aaowm ema�[ >uiro 1 ow to' nmmw I y mr 1 $4 / 2AMON rs I I e1r' pommm j j ft o WAR wn i � r ♦ wwur r Sm r/ a mr ran �..� we e W AT r.� ir._._._._._.� L._._._..J 1°'°^ woo PLE �-- -•- .- .T._._._._._. o I 1 i lw APh i i I era ww '♦ uu u i ; ./ s47 an i I I I 1 I I L.- -- -- -- -- -- ---- • -- -• —. it IN� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Date: February 3 , 2009 Subject: Receive Greater Cornelia Area/West 70th Street Traffic Study Info /Background: Agenda Item # V. A. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion A Corridor Study of West 70�' Street from Highway 100 to France Avenue was initiated over two years ago with a goal to develop possible solutions for transportation and land use issues within the corridor. A Study Advisory Committee (SAC) comprised of corridor residents, business owners and members of the Transportation and Planning commissions, was formed to complete the study. The Edina Transportation Commission at their January 15, 2009 meeting accepted the recommendations from the Study Advisory Committee's January 8, 2009 meeting. The ETC has integrated the SAC recommendations to lower speeds, reduced traffic volumes and increase safety along the corridor. SAC chair Brown and ETC chair Workinger will attend the February 3 meeting for the purpose of previewing the study in advance of the February 17 public hearing. Please note that the report for this agenda item is in the back of your packet. G: \Engineedng\Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \STUDIES \Traffic Studies \W 70th Corridor - France to 100\ Admin \REPORT\FINAL\20090203_RR_ doc RECEIVED JAN 161009 January 15, 2009 Mayor Hovland and members of Edina City Council RE: 7e Street Corridor Reconstruction I respectfully submit for your consideration the enclosed petition. The petition is only signed by property owners who will be assessed for reconstruction of West 7e Street and are within 400 feet of the proposed 70ffi and West Shore Drive traffic signal. Let us complete the recommendations made by SRF in the 1980 study before we install a costly traffic signal that may not be needed to solve the geometric problem on the West 70m Street corridor. Our traffic counts are virtually the same as the study in the 1980s, we std need the free right turn at Highway 100 closed as recommended by SRF in the 1980s. Please proceed with funding the Phase I reconstruction, but with the West Shore Drive traffic signal moved into Phase H. After the completion of Phase I and the Crosstown project, a study will be necessary to evaluate the impact of said improvements. We can then determine if further controls at West Shore Drive and Valley View are justified or cost effective. The residents on West 70m Street look forward to a quieter blacktop roadway, a slower school zone, signage to announce the Cornelia neighborhood, professionally designed landscape improvements that will calm traffic and improve our canopy and aesthetics. Pedestrian initiated crosswalk signals at the Arneson Park entrance and at Creston Road would provide much needed pedestrian safety. Closure of the free right tarn will provide needed access gaps in the corridor. The retention of left turn lanes and all existing on- street parking will continue to provide a safe, livable residential street for all residents and users of West 7e Street. Thank You Jan Ferrell 4704 West 7e Street Enclosures: Petition and 4 maps 7 PACES Page 1 We, the undersigned, are requesting that the city of Edina move the installation of the traffic signal at West 70th Street and West Shore Drive into Phase II of the West 7& Street Corridor Improvements. We base this request on the following: 1. The Phase I "closure of the free right turn at Highway 100" may provide the necessary gaps in traffic that are needed at Normandale Boulevard and West Shore Drive for safer access to the corridor. 2.. The combination of Phase I and completion of the Crosstown improvements could provide the gap in traffic and volume reductions that are needed for a safer corridor. 3. At this time, it is unlikely that a traffic signal at West Shore Drive would meet the MnDOT warrant A traffic signal cannot be used to slow or constrict traffic. If MnDOT warrant is not met, MnDOT would contribute nothing to the cost of the traffic signal. We do not want to be assessed for a traffic signal that does not meet MnDOT warrant 4. Evaluate Phase I and Crosstown improvements before installing the aforementioned traffic signal. 5. Our homes would be negatively impacted both financially and environmentally by the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of West 7& Street and West Shore Drive. ,I l4 A-) rkk 644 t 709 cc��ST 78 ��7 �41434 .�S93S- 4103 W, I01L_ eG2� N Page 2 We, the undersigned, are requesting that the city of Edina move the installation of the traffic signal at West 70th Street and West Shore Drive into Phase H of the West 70d` Street Corridor Improvements. We base this request on the following: 1. The Phase I "closure of the free right turn at Highway 100" may provide the necessary gaps in traffic that are needed at Normandale Boulevard and West Shore Drive for safer access to the corridor. 2. The combination of Phase I and completion of the Crosstown improvements could provide the gap in traffic and volume reductions that are needed for a safer corridor. 3. At this time, it is unlikely that a traffic signal at West Shore Drive would meet the MnDOT warrant. A traffic signal cannot be used to slow or constrict traffic. If MnDOT warrant is not met, MnDOT would contribute nothing to the cost of the traffic signal. We do not want to be assessed for a traffic signal that does not meet MnDOT warrant. 4. Evaluate Phase I and Crosstown improvements before installing the aforementioned traffic signal. 5. Our homes would be negatively impacted both financially and environmentally by the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of West 701' Street and West Shore Drive. ZZ IN IN-S�k.)O O�r-a- 0 UR K1 SALFANZ RD Queue Lanes east and west bound Acceleration Lanes east and west bound IP3, PC- z X: InTH 4'.T tq so 10,q z ASPASIA CIR g fit in 3C LANTANA LA HONARDO LA 0 .S C- rj 00 C -zo A. r4— !ANDOVER AD BELVIDERE LA VA. fj j T&A Ab le 4C T Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Hennepin County Oblique Aerials + Images courtesy oU Mkxvsoftw Virtual EarthTM 2008 +•, S! `;v Div• :".`1 ej _ L e f � r aP' Page l of 1 c IW- _ -cn a : 500e $ -IcnmR Corpor 2^- 0$N4VTEQ -`'z { TflorrpCy : ^:erna:••onal p�� Closure of the free right turn at Northbound Hwy 100 will stop the free flow of cars and will group traffic entering the 70th Street corridor, allowing for gaps in the traffic at Normandale Boulevard and West Shore Drive S http:// gis. co. hennepin. mn. us/ HCPropertyMapBirdseye .aspx ?PID==3002824340082 1/13/2009 Hennepin Count} Oblique Aerials Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Imag" aourteay of. POxesoftw Virtual Eardim 2006 Int D. - "y t t f t,9L��?' '"t!'_ +:,max= -- �':�•,' Page 1 of 1 1? 30 yds yy+►- SMn AVTEQ 4� 2008 P #ometry ?nLraa=nat Cu *� A Pedestrian activated crossing signal (i.e. at 51" and Halifax) would provide access from the north side of 70th and CPC members to Arneson Park and the parking lot. http:// gis. co. hennepin. mn. us/ HCPropertyXIaptBirdseye .aspx ?PID= 3002324340082 1/13/2009 Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Images courtesy of. Hicrosoft® Virtual EarttJ" 2008 A ADO Page ] of 1 .�Y t f .. _ 3Q YdS y 2008 FLcrosoft Corpora[,, '- 2008 MAVTEQ y 2008 Pictometry internailonal Corp. A Pedestrian activated crossing signal (i.e. at 51" and Halifax) would provide access from the north side of 70th and CPC members to Arneson Park and the parking lot. 7 littp:// gis. co. hennepin. mn. us/ HCPmpertyMap /Birdseye.aspx ?PID�---3002824340082 1 /l 3/2009 0 To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 3, 2009 Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. o� e N RESOLUTION NO. 2009-20 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to Edina Fire Department: Residential Mortgage Group $100.00 Donation to Braemar Golf Course: Fred Friswold e $100.00 Braemar Mens Club $25.00 Raymond Engh $25.00 Harley Hagstrom $25.00 Jack Isaaman $25.00 Dated: February 3, 2009 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS' CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 3, 2009 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 To: Mayor & City Council From: Jeff Long, Dep. Police Chief Date: February 3, 2009 Subject: First Reading Ordinance No. 2009 -03, Amending Section 1020 False Alarms. KBYUK A ION Agenda Item V .C. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action Motion F] Resolution ® Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Approve the amended ordinance to provide consistency with the 2009 fee schedule for false alarms. Info/Background: As part of the 2009 budget process a $25.00 fee was added for all first time "false alarms' that the police respond to. The fee was approved and added to the fee schedule under City Code #185.01 - Schedule A. City Code number 1020.02 currently reads that a fee is payable "to the City for the second and each subsequent false police alarm within a twelve month period." To be consistent with the new fee schedule the code should be updated to read that a fee is payable "to the City for each false police alarm within a twelve month period." A copy of the proposed amended ordinance is attached to this report. ORDINANCE NO. 2009-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1020 FALSE ALARMS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 1020.02 of Edina Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 1020.02 Fee for False Police Alarm. A fee in the amount set forth in Section 185 of this Code shall be payable to the City for the seGend and- each subsequent-false police alarrh within a twelve month, period. The fee for an automatic police alarm shall be payable by the owner of the building or premises from which the alarm was received and shall be payable within ten days after a statement therefore is mailed or delivered by the City. Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be effective after its adoption and publication according to law. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James'B. Hovland, Mayor To: Mayor & City Council From: Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Date: February 3, 2009 Subject: Set hearing date for an appeal of the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying application B- 09 -01, 6120 Brookview Ave. for a 7.14 -foot front yard setback variance REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # V. D. 1. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: See attached planning materials. Recommendation: Set hearing date of February 17, 2009, for variance request, B- 09 -01, for a 7.14 -foot front yard setback variance on property located at 6120 Brookview Ave., JMS Custom Homes, LLC. �I To: Mayor & City Council From: Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Date: February 3, 2009 Subject: Set hearing date for an appeal of the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying application B- 09 -01, 6120 Brookview Ave. for a 7.14 -foot front yard setback variance REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # V. D. 1. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: See attached planning materials. Recommendation: Set hearing date of February 17, 2009, for variance request, B- 09 -01, for a 7.14 -foot front yard setback variance on property located at 6120 Brookview Ave., JMS Custom Homes, LLC. Larkin Homan ATTORNEYS January 29, 2009 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Department' City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Variance Application for 6120 Brookview, Edina, MN Appeal of Denial by Zoning Board of Appeals Dear Mr. Teague: Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL; 952 - 835 -3800 FAX: 952- 896 -3333 WEB: wwwlarkinhoiiinan.com Via Email and U.S. Mail We represent JMS Custom Homes, LLC ( ",JMS ") in connection with the above - referenced variance application. This letter shall serve as JMS's request for an appeal from the Zoning Board of Appeals' January 28, 2009 denial of JMS's variance request. JMS requests that the appeal of the variance denial be scheduled for the next regularly scheduled Edina City Council meeting. If you should have any questions concerning JMS's requested appeal or need any further information or documentation, please advise. Thank you. Sincerely, Rob A. Stefonow cz, for Larkin Hoffinan Daly & Lin ren Ltd. Direct Dial: 952- 896 -3254 Direct Fax: 952- 842 -1718 Email: rstefonowicz(@.Iarkinhoffman.com Cc: Jeff Schoenwetter Eric Doty Tom Scott, Esq. Peter Coyle, Esq. 1238657.1 City of Edina January 29, 2009 JMS Custom Homes, LLC 5250 West 74th Street Edina, MN 55439 Re: B -09 -01 - A 7.14 foot front yard setback variance for a new home at 6120 Brookview Avenue, Edina, MN To Whom It May Concern: In connection with your recent request for the above referenced variance, which was heard by the Edina Zoning Board on Wednesday, January 28, 2009, may we advise you that same has been denied. If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than February 9, 2009. If you have further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at 952 - 826 -0465. Sincerely, Jackie Hoogenakker Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals h City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION DENYING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE AT 6120 BROOKVIEW AVENUE City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Edina, •Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 JMS Custom Homes have requested a 7.14 front yard setback variance at 6120 Brookview Avenue. 1.02 The request is an after -the -fact variance for a home under construction. 1.03 A building permit was issued on Friday, December 5, 2008 for the new home currently under construction on the property. The City received a complaint on January 5, 2009, regarding the front yard setback of the new home. 1.04 The survey submitted for the building permit illustrates an established average front yard setback of 31.6 feet. A building permit was issued based on that survey, and the home was constructed at the proposed 31.6 foot setback. 1.05 The property owner's survey company, Landform, was contacted on January 5, 2009, to verify the how the average setback was calculated. The zoning ordinance requires that the average setback of existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings on the same side of the street between intersections. The data provided by Landform shows the average front yard setback of the seven homes located along the block excluding the subject home is 38.7 feet. The average is calculated by adding up the front yard setbacks of the seven homes and dividing that number by seven. The home under construction therefore, over -laps the required front yard setback by 7.14 feet. The building permit was therefore issued in error based upon the incorrect information furnished by the applicant. 1.06 A "stop work" order was posted on the property on Wednesday, January 7, 2009. The owner of the property was notified that resolution of this issue may be pursued by either filing for and obtaining a variance to allow the house to remain at the same front yard setback or by modifying the construction to maintain the required front yard setback. 1.07 JMS Custom Homes filed a law suit against the City of Edina, and won an order granting a temporary injunction that allows them to continue work on the home. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because: 1) The proposal does not meet the variance findings of Section 850.04.Subd.1.F, of the Zoning Ordinance. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 `1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINAIM ESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com RESOLUTION Page Two 2) There is no unique hardship to the property. The proposed new home can be relocated to meet the required front yard setback of 38.7 feet. 3) When considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact the proposed home built within the required setback would have on the neighborhood, complying with the ordinance is reasonable. 4) The need for the variance is self created. 5) The variance would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 6) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The variance would not be consistent with the homes to the south, or the established average setback on the block. b. The new home would be built essentially in front of the home to the south with is setback 63 feet from the street, thereby blocking their front view to the north. The intent of the ordinance is to provide uniform front yard setbacks on a block: Having one home built 31.5 feet closer to the street than the adjacent home does not meet the intent of the ordinance. d. The only basis for the variance is economic considerations alone which is not a sufficient basis. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Edina, to deny the requested front yard setback variance of 7.14 feet for property located at 6120 Brookview Avenue. Adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on January 28, 2009. ATTEST: Chair, Floyd Grabiel Zoning Board Secretary, Jackie Hoogenakker ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Kris Aaker January 28, 2009 B -09 -01 Assistant Planner Brief Description: A 7.14 foot front yard setback variance for a new home under construction at 6120 Brookview Avenue for JMS, Construction. Recommended Action: Deny the 7.14 foot front yard setback variance request. Introduction /Background The applicant is in the process of building a 2,994 square foot home on the south portion of a 13,362 square foot lot. The property is one buildable parcel made up of two 50 foot wide lots, (lots 5 and 6), platted as part of the original Fairfax subdivision. A building permit was issued on Friday, December 5, 2008 for the new home currently under construction on the property. The City received a complaint on January 5, 2009, regarding the front yard setback of the new home. Concern was raised that the home appeared to be closer to the street than code would allow. The survey submitted for the building permit illustrates an established average front yard setback of 31.6 feet. (See attached survey.) A building permit was issued based on that survey, and the home was constructed at the proposed 31.6 foot setback. The owner's survey company, Landform, was contacted on January 5, 2009, to verify how the average setback was calculated. The zoning ordinance requires that the average setback of existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings on the same side of the street between intersections. The data provided by Landform shows that the average front yard setback of the seven homes located along. the block excluding the subject home is 38.7 feet, and not 31.6 feet as indicated on the survey submitted for the building permit. The home under construction therefore, over- laps the required front yard setback by 7.14 feet. The building permit was issued in error based upon incorrect information furnished by the applicant. A "stop work" order was posted on the property on Wednesday, January 7, 2009. The owner of the property was notified that resolution of this issue may be pursued by either filing for and 143562 obtaining a variance to allow the house to remain at the same front yard setback or by modifying the construction to maintain the required front yard setback. The owner has chosen to pursue a variance to allow the home to remain in its existing location. Law Suit JMS Custom Homes filed a law suit and obtained a temporary injunction that allows them to continue work on the home pending the outcome of the law suit The suit is not relevant to the issue of whether or not a variance should be approved. The court documents are attached for informational purposes. Front Yard Setback Calculation The required setback for the R -1 zoning district is 30 feet. However, Section 850.11. Subd. 7.A established special front yard setback requirements for single dwelling unit lots. There are three ways to calculate the front yard setback, as demonstrated below: 1) Established Average Setback. When more than 25 percent of the frontage on one side of the street between intersections is occupied by buildings having front street setbacks of more or less than 30 feet, the average setback of such existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings or structures or additions thereto on the same side of that street and between said intersections. The "special front yard setback" rule is required for the subject lot because there is more than 25 percent of the frontage on the subject side of the street between intersections occupied by buildings having front street setbacks of more or less than 30 feet. The block is fully developed so the standard 30 foot setback is not applied with the special setback requirements used instead in this instance. To determine the established average setback, the setbacks of the seven homes on the block are added together and divided by 7. The resulting average front yard setback is 38.7 feet for this block. The "average of the block front setback line" of 31.6 feet, as depicted on the survey, is in error, or 7.14 feet closer to the street. It appears that the surveyor simply connected a line from the homes on each corner. 2) If a building or structure or addition thereto is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback and there are existing buildings on only one side of the built or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front street setback of said new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto need be no greater than that of the nearest adjoining principal building. This second paragraph of the special front yard setback requirements does not apply to the lot because there are existing buildings on both sides of the subject lot. 3) `If a building or structure or addition thereto is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback, and there are existing buildings on both sides of 143562 the new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front setback need be no greater than that which would be established by connecting a line parallel with the front lot line connecting the forward most portion of the adjacent principal building on each side." This third option could apply to the lot by connecting the forward most portions of the homes on either side. The survey did not illustrate the "connecting line" rule and in fact would have put the home farther back on the lot than the established average setback, because the home to the south is setback so far. The least restrictive setback in this instance is the established average setback. The least restrictive setback applicable is the established average setback. Primary Issue • Is the requested variance justified? Per Section 850.04.Subd.l .F, of the Zoning Ordinance, the following findings must be made: Findings for Variances. The Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Section. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by this Section; (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms of this Section. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests: 1) Is there an undue hardship that prevents a reasonable use of the property? No. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there is an undue hardship in complying with the Code that prohibits what is really a reasonable use. "Undue hardship" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The proposed use is not reasonable because it does not fit into the character of the neighborhood. While two out of seven structures on the block are closer to 143562 the street than the subject home, a reduction in setback beyond the average on the block is excessive and out of character especially regarding the location of the neighboring home to the south. There is no undue hardship other then the hardship created by the applicant's error in calculating the set back. The partially built home can be moved back on the lot and meet set backs. When considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact on the neighborhood, staff believes complying with the ordinance is reasonable. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? No. There are no unique or specific characteristics of the lot that would support granting a variance. A home can be built without encroaching beyond the average setback line. The lot is generous in area at 13,362 square feet, with ample room in which to locate at structure within the required setbacks. The need for the variance is entirely self created resulting from an error made by the applicant's surveyor. The applicant is a professional builder and its marketing plans for the home will be disrupted and costs will be incurred in moving the, home back on the lot but economic considerations-alone are not a basis for approving a variance. The applicant chose to proceed with constructing the home after being advised of the setback error. 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Yes. The new home would not be consistent with the homes to the south, which are setback 63.1 and 44.4 feet. The new home would be built essentially in front of the home to the south with is setback 63.1 feet from the front lot line, thereby blocking their front view to the north. A home of this size built this close to the street would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Deny the requested 7.14 -foot front yard setback variance. Denial is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal does not meet the variance findings of Section 850.04.Subd.1.F, of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) There is no unique hardship to the property. The proposed new home can be relocated to meet the required front yard setback of 38.7 feet. 3) When considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact the proposed home built within the 143562 required setback would have on the neighborhood, complying with the ordinance is reasonable. 4) The need for the variance is self created. 5) The variance would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 6) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The variance would not be consistent with the homes to the south, or the established average setback on the block. b. The new home would be built essentially in front of the home to the south with is setback 63.1 feet from the street, thereby blocking their front view to the north. C. The intent of the ordinance is to provide uniform front yard setbacks on a block. Having one home built 31.5 feet closer to the street than the adjacent home does not meet the intent of the ordinance. d. The only basis for the variance is economic considerations alone which is not a sufficient basis. 7) Considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact the proposed home built within the required setback would have on the neighborhood, complying with the ordinance is reasonable. Surrounding Land Uses There are single family homes located on the north, south, east and west sides of the subject property. Site Features The property is 13,362 square feet and contains a partially constructed, two -story home with an attached three car garage. Planning Guide Plan Designation: R -1, single family residential Zoning: Residential 143562 Jan -16 -09 09:52am From- T -875 P.002/003 F -639 DISTRICT COURT STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JMS Custom Homes, LLC, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING TCMPORARY INJUNCTION Court File No. 27 -CV -09 -830 VS. Ci ►y of Edna, a r;,».nicipal corporation, Defendant. The above = entitled matter came on before the Honorable Marilyn Brown Rosenbaum for hearing on January 13, 2009 pursuant to the Motion of Plaintiff for a Temporary Restraining Order. After further submissions, a separate hearing was held on January 15, 2009 for a Temporary Injunction pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 65.02. Rob A. StefonowicZ, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Thomas M. Scott, Esq. appeared on behalf of Defendant. Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, and being fully in formed in the premises, the Court makes the following: ORDER I. The Motion of Plaintiff JMS Custom Homes, LLC for a Temporary Restraining Order, or, in the alternative, for a Temporary Injunction, is granted. 2. Until further Order of the Court, Defendant City of Edina is enjoined from enforcement of the Stop Work Order, dated January 7, 2009, and/or the Amended Stop Work Order, dated January 9, 2009, for the single - family home located at 6120 Brookview Avenue, Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Home "). Plaintiff JMS Custom Homes, LLC may proceed with construction of the Home. Jan-16 -09 09:53am From- T -875 P.003/003 F-639 N bond or security, pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 65.03, shall be required J. o of Plaintiff. The Court deems a bond to be unnecessary since Defendant has failed to City is wrongfully enjoined. establish any costs or damages which may be suffered if the 4. A separate Memorandum shall issue and be incorporated herein. I - 0' i •►� i L � Lrr.� .�IY . - ly 1 • • • .• l Marilyn Brown Rosenbaum rt •�_ . • • 2 Jan - 16=09 02:47pm From— T-878 P.002 /010 F-643 DISTRICT COURT STATE OF mDMSOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JMS Custom Homes, LLC, Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION VS. Court File No. 27 -CV -09 -830 City of Edina, a municipal corporation, Defendant. The above - entitled mutter came on before the Honorable. Marilyn Brown Rosenbaum for hearing on January 13, 2009 pursuant to the Motion of Plaintiff for a Order. After further submissions, a separate hearing was held on Temporary Restraining p January 15, 2009 for a Temporary Injunction pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 65.02. Rob A. Stefonowicz, Esq. appeared on behalf of PlaintifF. Thomas M. Scott, Esq. appeared on behalf of Defendant. Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, and being fully informed in the premises, the Court makes the following: ••1 1, The Motion of Plaintiff JMS Custom Homes, LLC for a Temporary Restraining Order, or, in the alternative, for a Temporary Injunction, is granted. 2. Until further Order of the Court, Defendant City of Edina is enjoined from enforcement of the Stop Work Order, dated January 7, 2009, and/or the Amended Stop Work Order, dated January 9, 2009, for the single - family home located at 6120 Brookview Avenue, Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Home"). Plaintiff JMS \ Custom domes, LLC may proceed with construction of the Dome. 1 Jan -16 -09 02:44m From- T -8T8 P.003 /010 F -643 3. No bond or security, pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 65.03, shall be required of Plaintiff. The Court deems a bond to be unnecessary since Defendant has failed to establish any costs or damages which may be suffered if the City is wrongfIly enjoined. 4. The attached Memorandum is incorporated herein. Judge +1 Court Brown Rosenbaum Jan -16 -0A 02:47am From— T -878 P.004/010 F -643 ME [QRANDUM PROCEDURAL POSTURE JMS Custom Homes, LLC ("JMS") is the owner of certain real property located at 6120 Brookview Avenue in Edina, Hennepin County, Nlinnesota ( "the Property") In the fall of 2008, JMS applied for a building permit to be issued by Defendant City of Edina ("Edina!'), and submitted plans and specifications and a Certificate of Survey ( "the Survey"), prepared by Landform. The Survey identified the "average of block front setback line" of 31.6 feet. Edina reviewed these submissions, provided comments relating to the Survey, and commented on the side setback. On December 5, 2008, Edina issued a Building Permit and JMS commenced construction of a single - family home ( "the;Home") on the Property. On December 11, 2008, Edina inspected and approved the footings. On December 12, 2008 Edina inspected and approved the foundation reinforcement On December 15, 2008, Edina approved the as -built survey of the Property, which again identified the "average of block front setback line" of 31.6 feet_ The parties stipulate that all surveys prepared in this matter identify the "average of block front .setback line" of 31.6 feet. On December 19, 2008, Edina inspected and approved the foundation. On December 30, 2008, Edina issued a permit for mechanical work. On January 5th, 2009, the neighbor residing in the south adjacent home contacted Edina to question the Home's compliance with the front setback requirement. On January 7, 2009, Edina issued a Stop Work Order due to an "incorrect setback, #92293" m , requiring JMS to imediately cease work until the setback issue is resolved. An Amended Stop Work Order was issued by email on January 9, 2009, allowing JMS to: (1) complete the roofing; (2) install house wrap, sheathing, and lath over- exterior openings; (3) insulate between top plates and roof sheathing; (4) install a furnace to heat the basement only; and (5) remove excess fill. The Edina City Code ("City Code") § 850.07, subd. 11 provides as follows: Frontabe of Lots on a Street. All lots shall have at least 30 feet of frontage on at least one street other than alleys or limited access roadways to which private access is prohibited. Private easements shall not be considered as frontage for purposes of this Subdivision. Notwithstanding the requirements of this subdivision, lots in a townhouse plat need not front on a street provided that the 7 Jan - 16=08. 02:47pm From- T-878 P.005 /010 F -643 townhouse plat of which the lot is a part has at least 30 feet of frontage on at least one street. Code 850.11, subd. 6 provides, in relevant art, as follows: The City § p p Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks*and Ileigbt• B. N inimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection. 850.11). 1. Single dwelling unit buildings on lots 75 feet or more in width — Front Street -- 3 0'. The City Code § 850.11, subd. 7 provides, in relevant pan, as follows: Special Requirements. in addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. 1. Established AVerage Setback. When more than 25 percent of the frontage on one side of a street between intersections is occupied by buildings having front street setbacks of more or less than 30 feet, the average setback of such existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings or structures or additions thereto on the same sidee ��e or and between said intersections. If a building or addition thereto is to be built or located where there is an established average setback and there are existing buildings on only one side of the built or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front street setback of said new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto need be no greater than that of the nearest adjoining principal building. if a building or structure or addition thereto is to be. built or relocated where there is an established average setback, and there are existing buildings on both sides of the new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front setback need be no greater than that which would be established by connecting a line parallel with the front lot line connecting the most forward portion of the adjacent principal building on each side. By certain photographs, exhibits, and testimony, jN4S has shown that the Home's foundation and framing have been completed, and the roofing materials are partially installed. JMS has established that it has contracted to participate m the Spring parade of 0 Jan-16' -09 02:47pm From- T -878 P.008 /010 F -643 Homes between February 28 and March 22, 2009. The contract provides for penalties if Jeffrey Martin . Schoenwetter the Home is not completed. JMS's owner, event for ( "Schoenwetter ") testified that the Parade of Homes is the premier marketing le attend during the weekend for three or four weeks, JMS, that approximately 500 peop and that 80% of JMS's business comes from this event. Schoenwetter also testified and the Home could still be completed by the Parade of Homes but, if forced to stop rd go through the variance process, it would be impossible to complete the Home in a timely manner. In addition, non - participation and the existence of the partially completed Home would harm JMS's reputation and would likely put JMS out of business. Schoenwetter stated that due to the Stop Work Orders, JMS is in default under the terms of its construction financing agreement, that building materials are at risk, and the terms of the Amended Stop Worlc Order are insufficient to adequately protect the Home under existing extreme winter conditions. JMS seeks injunctive relief to enjoin the enforcement of the Stop Work Orders and to allow it to complete construction of the Home and participate in the Spring Parade of Homes. JMS claims that: (1) the City Code provisions axe ambiguous, vague, and must be strictly construed against Edina; and (2) it has detrimentally relied on Edina 's approvals, causing irreparable injury. Edina argues that the "special setback requirements" of City Code § 850.11, subd. 7.A.1 are clear, workable, and apply. Edina claims that JMS has adequate remedies in that it may request a variance at the next Zoning Board meeting on January 28, 2009, and, if a variance is denied, JMS would then have the right to appeal to Edina City Council at the next meeting on February 19, 2009. Edina also claims that it was not negligent in relying on the Survey and should be able to enforce the City Code at any time and under any circumstances- STANDARD FOIL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF "Injunctive relief should be awarded only in clear cases, reasonably free from doubt and when necessary. to prevent great and irreparable injury" AMF pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 110 N.W.2d 348, 351 (Minn. 1961). The following five factors are considered by the Court in determining whether to grant injunctive relief, 5 Jan -16 =09 02 :47pm From— (1) The nature and background of the relationship between the parties preexisting the dispute giving rise to the request for relief; (2) The harm to.be suffered by plaintiff if the -restraint is denied as compared to that inflicted on defendant if the injunction issues; T -878 P.007 /010 F -643 (3) The likelihood that one party or the other will prevail on The merits when the fact situation is viewed in the light of established precedents fixing the limits of equitable relief; (4) The aspects of the fact situation, if any, which permit or require consideration of public policy expressed in the statutes, State and Federal;. and (5) The administrative burdens involved in judicial supervision and enforcement of the temporary Dahlberg Bros., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 137 N.W.2d 314, 321 -22 (Munn• 1965). The burden of proving that a preliminary injunction should be issued rests entirely with the moving party. Modern Computer Systems, V. Modern Banking Systems, Inc., 871 F.2d 734, 737 (8th Cir. 1989). The Party seeking the injunction must establish that the legal remedy is not adequate and that the injunction is necessary. to prevent great and irreparable injury. Cherne Industries, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., 287 N.W.2d 81, 92 (Minn. 1979) (citing North Central Public Service Co. v. Village of Circle Pines, 224N.W.2d 741, 746 (1 974)). DECISION The Court has considered the relevant Dahlberg factors and Plaintiffs Motion for Order, or, in. the alternative due to the full hearing and testimony, Temporary Restraining ' Plaintiff s Motion for a Temporary Injunction, should be granted. The nature and background of the e relationship n between the parries preexisting the dispute giving rise to the request As set forth herein above, the parties have an ongoing relationship based upon the application of J1v4S for a residential building permit for the construction of a single - fAmily home in the City of Edina. JMS has attempted to comply with e`!ery requirement 0 Jan -16 =04 02:48pm From- T -878 P.008 /010 F -643 of the City Code, and, after obtaining the building permit, has commenced construction of the Home with a front setback of 31.6 feet. Ediva's approval of the front setback, subsequent inspections, and later Stop Work Orders, along with the ambiguous, contradictorjr, and unworkable City Code provisions, all weigh in favor of granting a temporary injunction and allowing MS to continue to construct the Home. Additionally, granting the Temporary Injunction allows JMS to mitigate substantial damages to the benefit of all parties. This factor clearly weighs in favor of the issuance of a Temporary Injunction. The harm to be suffered by pAaintiff if the injunction is denied as compared to that inflicted on Defendant if the injunction issues. a to be inflicted The immediate harm to be suffered by MS relates to the damage on the building materials installed and on the site of the partially built Home as well as es to be suffered b MS. The extremes of January weather catastrophic financial damages y can and will inflict damage to these materials and the structure itself and will affect the warranties attached to certain building materials. In February, the next harm will befall JMS if the Home is not completed. JMS's opportunities to sell the Home, as well as to market and negotiate future construction projects, depend on completing the Home ut time to participate in the Spring Parade of Homes. Failure to do so will result in harm to its reputation, the eventual destruction of the business, and the unavoidable effect on employees, subcontractors, and the termination of JMS's relationship with its lender. Edina argues that "there is apparent irreparable harm to a governmental unit by a continuous and laiowiag `isolation of that body's duly promulgated laws and regulations." Rockville Township v. Lang, 387 N.W.2d 200, 205 (Minn- App. 1986). However, it is not established that the Home's setback is a continuing and knowing 'violation of the City Code, and the harm to MS clearly outweighs any potential harm to Edina. This factor clearly weighs in favor of JMS and the issuance of a Temporary Injunction. The likelihood that one party or the other will prevail on the merits when the facts are viewed in the light of established precedents fixing the limits of equitable relief. There are at least two possible legal arguments that must be explored when addressing the'possibility of success on the merits: (1) whether the City Code provisions 7 Jan-16-09. 02:48pm From- T-878 P.009 /010 F-643 are ambiguous, vague, or unworkable and should be construed strictly against Edina and in favor of JMS; and (2) whether Edina has an absolute right to enforce the City Code at any time, in light of the unique facts here, including the uncertainty that a knowing and continuous violation exists, JMS's claim of detrimental reliance, and the potential substantial damage claim.. Uue to the vague, ambiguous, conflicting, and unworkable provisions of the City Code, the minimum setback of 30 feet, the setback consistency with the other homes on the block, and the reliance by all parties on the Survey, it is likely that JMS will prevail on the merits as to this issue. "Zorii ng ordinances must be considered in the light of their underlying policy goals" Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v City of .Roseville, 295 N.W.2d 604, 608 -9 (Minn. 1980). Secondly, "zoning ordinances should be construed strictly against the city and in favor of the property owner." Id. at 608. It is also likely that 7MS will prevail as to the legal issue of whether Edina can be estopped from enforcing the City Code. To date, The facts. established in this matt er tend ursery Sales and other cases cited by Edina. "Phis to distinguish this case from Frank's N factor clearly weighs in favor of JMS and the issuance of a Temporary Injunction. The aspects of the fact situation, if any, which permit or require consideration of the public policy expressed in the statutes, State or Federal, Constitutions, Codes or Ordinances. public policy does require Edina to attempt to gain full compliance with its City Code. However, when there is substantial detrimental reliance on the surveys, approvals, and inspections, there are parallel public policy concerns, including consideration of the rights of private property owners and the balancing of remedies to include application of equitable' doctrines of detrimental reliance and equitable estoppel. This factor clearly weighs in favor of JMS and the issuance of a Temporary Injunction. The administrative burdens involved in judicial supervision and enforcement of the temporary decree. There are no administrative burdens, and this factor weighs in favor of granting the Temporary Injunction. 8 Jan -16 -04 01:48pm From- T -8TB P.010 /010 F -643 Security — Minn. R Ciw. P. 65.03, in-unction be gran wd without the P1ainntifPs request that the Temporary, zequirement o£ security or bond under Munn. p_ -Civ. P= 65.03(x) should be granted_ The City has' failed to establish any costs or damages which maybe suffered, so as to require a bond. MBR 69C1 6100 LOCATION MAP 6105 6025 6024 611) E112 6197 Legend Highlighted Feature 6029 6028 E128 6129 -- '. House Number Labels 6033 6032 E145 6146 Street Name Labels - -- - - -� City Limits 6077 6036 6037 ^/ Creeks Lake Names 6039 Lakes 60(9 fi014 hots i Parks Parcels 6101 61ST ST W 6100 6105 6106 6901 6109 6108 P-1a Pr,rk 6113 6912 _ 6117 6116 6117 i 6121 6120 6121 6125 6126 r� 6129 6128 6129 6135 6131 6133 4412 6136 E13T 6137 4132 4128 6141 4404 6143 82ND S7 W a3os oafs a3o1 0 4213 6129 4125 i'......_._.r._ (401 v.v.-oa.t. :r♦..NS Cw.-Qa;C: AGGG4' M 4199 Ji1 B -09 -01 Front Yard Setback Variance PID:1902824430091 j O � t f D ' 6120 Brookview Ave �ifl �>4 r2� (� L. Edina, MN 55424 •��71 T�'ttL+.'{Yy • Lu 69C1 6100 6105 6708 611) E112 6197 6720 612} 6125 E128 6129 613) 6i36 61s1 E145 6146 VARIANCE APPLICATION o e g y lass CASE. NUMBER ' �_DATE FEE PAID 3�•-° City of Edina Planning Department * www.citvofedina.com 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 * fax (952) 826- 0389 FEE: (IRES - $300.0W NON -RES - $500 APPLICANT: NAME: SdVk'& COS-aZM 1�av�.S . LLC.• (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: SZ-SCD WEl w 7��� �n0►NAr PHONE: `"r;?- M"9 3UD EMAIL: � Z�O-N)f2� _A&S 6­>5_)0/ AA 40mf1 AOAA PROPERTY OWNER: NAME: J;ms Ca 5 —A'-yK 40/ye-S (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: SQ S-Q �,R t 7 4 _<jVefZ G- .,A PHONE: qTZ q49 3b5() LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (written and electronic form): LT- co Lal_ace- z3, F'a.aFA "You must provide a full legal description. If more space is needed, please use a separate sheet. Note: The County may not accept the resolution approving your project if the legal description does not match their records. This may delay your project. PROPERTY ADDRESS: l I7_o At &wz, PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: Fez PTACAO-) (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: NAME: PHONE: 95•Z` 173 -5777 EMAIL: A +u C,R.P( -) AOL. COM SURVEYOR: NAME: LAtjDFDZm OV4•+JXAe, J PHONE: LiZ (o3C -oZ30 EMAIL: 3 PL- rrAkA -NA)U LA.-JO -17094M.rje—% Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve an undue hardship which was not ❑ self- imposed or a mere inconvenience: Correct extraordinary circumstances ❑ applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Preserve a substantial property right IZI ❑ possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district Not be materially detrimental to the public ❑ welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT This application should be processed in my name, and I am the party whom the City should contact about this application. By signing this application, I certify that all fees, charges, utility bills, taxes, special assessments and other debts or obligations due to the City by me or for this property have been paid. I further certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approvals that have been granted to me for any matter. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and, to the best of my knowledge, the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. Applicant's Signature 'Date OWNER'S STATEMENT I am the fee title owner of the above described property, and I agree to this application. (If a corporation or partnership is the fee title holder, attach a resolution authorizing this application on behalf of the board of directors or partnership.) Owner's signature Note. Both signatures are required (if the owner is different than the applicant) before we can process the application, otherwise it is considered incomplete. Larkin Hoffman TTORNEYS January 14, 2009 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Department City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re Variance Application for 6120 Brookview, Edina, MN Dear Mr. Teague: Larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952$35 -3800 FAX: 952 -819�6�-- 3�3�3L3 ¢��� WEB: WWw.larkinhoifInancorn We represent JMS Custom Homes, LLC ( "JMS'J in connection with the current residential construction project at the above - referenced site, together with the related litigation between JMS and the City of Edina. Enclosed for filing, please find the application of JMS for a variance from the City's front street setback standard. JMS objects to the need for a variance inasmuch as it believes its submitted survey and building plans in support of the City's Building Permit was lawful and properly approved in full conformance with applicable City setback regulations. Therefore, by submitting this Variance Application, JMS is not waiving any claims it may have against the City relating to the Stop Work Order nor the validity of the City's alleged interpretation of its setback averaging Ordinance, Section 850.11, subd. 7.A.1. The pleadings and memoranda on file with Hennepin County District Court, File No. 27- CV -09- 830, set forth the factual and legal basis for JMS's position on whether a variance is needed. In the alternative, if a variance is needed, JMS contends that it meets the City's requirements to support approval of the requested front street setback. 1. Relieve an undue hardship which was not self - imposed or a mere inconvenience. The record reflects that the City and JMS have a professional dispute about the correct interpretation of the City's setback averaging Ordinance, Section 850.11, subd. 7.A.1. There is no allegation in the record from the City or any other source that the need for the alleged variance is self-imposed or otherwise assumed needed to resolve a mere inconvenience. Compliance with the City's alleged interpretation would cause undue damage to the approved residential structure and inflict substantial financial and business harm to JMS. 2. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning dim strict. The approved residence structure currently satisfies the City's minimum front street setback of 30 feet. The as -built setback for the approved structure, at 31.6 feet, is in line with the existing residences on the same side of the block. Adherence to the City's alleged interpretation of its Mr. Cary Teague January 14, 2009 Page 2 its setback averaging Ordinance would unfairly penalize JMS due to the placement of one or more structures on the block, which have the effect of skewing the setback, based on the City's interpretation of it. 3. Preserve a substantial nrouerty right yossessed by other yroaerty in the vicinity and zoning district. Approval of the requested variance would not harm any other property on the block or within the established zoning district. The as -built setback exceeds the City's 30 -foot minimum front street setback and would be consistent with 4 other residences on the block. Application of the City's alleged interpretation would impose a substantial hardship on JMS and penalize its use of property by placing its structure at a setback greater than the majority of the residences on the block. 4. Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare of injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. JMS would not gain any setback advantage relative to the other existing residences on the block. The as -built setback applicable to the JMS structure is in line with other residences on the block, and exceeds the City's minimum setback. We understand that this request will be considered by the City's Board of Adjustment at a meeting scheduled for January 29, 2009. If you have any questions about the basis for the requested variance or need additional information, please call me immediately. rely Peter J. Coyle, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. Direct Dial: (952) 896 -3214 Direct Fax: (952) 842 -1704 Email: gcoylena larkinhoffman.com Cc: Jeff Schoenwetter Eric Doty Tom Scott, Esq. Rob Stefonowicz, Esq. Attachment: Variance Application 1236589.1 � � , SETBACK U |�� ���|�|T �"`^����^'^�'' FOR: JM8 CUSTOM HOMES ``-n051 Pmawxoo cnoweR | ' | | � | / . | u^—'�c���w | / . . | | | ^ ' | | ' | / | | � | essr pn uwe usso TO —__=�� | | ssrxous� AN xvE�^ce / -- -- -- ' z—''� era^cc | � | . � [------ —�---1 / . | =-7 | | | | �— -- -- -- -- -- ---- --� |J�bNo. J11,505005 swnuvINFEET 0 50 SCALE IN FEET amc Butler Square 1���em s�m o�n ^ Minneapolis, mws40u ° ^ web: umumnmoe, SETBACK LINE EXHIBIT FOR: JMS CUSTOM HOMES IN FEET 0 5D SCALE IN FEET MOST FORWARD CORNER i;d 71 28.2' 800 c Butler Square 100 North Sixth Street L A N D IF 0 R M Minneapolis, MN 55403 Web: landform.net L Job No. JM505005 Drawing: srLbock vwh6m.1 By. JrIP BEST PIT LINE USED TO --444.2' ESTABLISH AN AVERAGE SETBACK ,MOST POPWARO CORNER 28.2' 800 c Butler Square 100 North Sixth Street L A N D IF 0 R M Minneapolis, MN 55403 Web: landform.net L Job No. JM505005 Drawing: srLbock vwh6m.1 By. JrIP i - " ► }•, � �' � r - t++' � �;Ti1-... � .. yam, _�' _ 4 + r /" • l� a 'W2�'" 4 �M ilk � �� y 1R"1�"� � ��� x.P������� � � I s 1 4t'. CERT UE OF SURVEY FOR: A.- _jSTOM HOMES REVISION HISTORY NOV 2 5 ZOU6, • E-MSTINC TWO - STORY. "' 'O'TMY" -NAL TH O/L3/08 ORIL Oq/02/08 aeVSW FouhVATIGN ELEVAT&S FR_ WOOD FRAM- HOUSE -2. 04/a/ve CLEW colliews FRET FIRST FLOOR (THRESHOLD) 896.2 112LW_ 0112 BROOK VIEW AVE. VI AVE 7 10/01/08 My CaTSWTS P TOP 0 TOP OF POURED FOUNDATION 895.7 F 7 FFE-ay.5 10/30/08 NEW SULONC PLANS 0 20 11/11/08 NEW 8"W KAH9 SCALE IN FEET LL 11/19/08 - NEW BULONG Pw� �,3q5.q 11/24408 . New SuLQNC AND ADJUST LOCATION 1�.7 C'.' Lt DESCRIPTION EXISTING DESCRIPTION P 7 aLLONC POWERPOLC _LND STEM- •ruTPLE u,'Kwo N PW cAP #POO 30, 58q.? CANOPY OVERHANG AIR COWTIONCR bq5.. 7 7 CONCRETE %PFACE El ELECTRIC METER GARAGE .5-15.4 .5q4.5 3q3.q"' 5PRLXe '�LB L. '12.5 Eli TYPE LIJ 0 PON MONUMENT FOUND arrumNar, SURFACE SANITARY SEWER LINE fOr xmge PIE71 --o '%VTP-- WATER MAN -L SURFACE 77�1 CRAVE prior to L. -L-1 --OT- OVERHEAD TELEPHONE 2j,,0rjjg any grades SILT FEENCIIN I JG IS CONTOUR _OTV- OVERHEAD TV ar�dfbr drainage r23.4 SPOT ELEVATION -L?E,- OVERHEAD UTILITY LMS REQ UIRED?, 5 FT. SUE LIE-- 9*47 CONCRETE CURB NOTE NL91BM (D 4FT. WOOD FENCE___ -__ -_ 133.7'(M) 133.79(P)4j� q- FWW. MAPLE k (8615) OtSTANCE PER 'ec-- "m (P) M 95 x 890.0 FE14CW RECORDED PLAT 2 2 -n 4 7.50 WOOD RETAININC (M) MEASURED DtSTANCE WALL MFLIPLE 5T�_ L .1 .. " 4- 1 E- % -RED COVERED-- A OF FeoNT'SETBACK SHRUG PROPOSED FINISHED CRAVE BOX C _LM 1 I FT. -J PORCH CANTLEVCR EL&VATION 4.4 7 69, •TREES PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR Ld C_ 10.00 5cw-3 MANHOLE OX. le .. - PROPOSED Two-STOW aq �4 Sv. Vf*CE AND WOOD FRAME HOUSE FULL 1* POURED -�T 120 13FtOO1CV1E y mi;pk" X L THE DtIENSONS SHOWN ARE TO THE BRICK LEDGE. ORNER -4 on L94 L 2200 N�W�� . `36.0 CKV5 2. THE SEVER AND WATERMAN UrLrtY SERVICES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS DERIVED FROM MAPS PROVMD BY THE CRY OF WINA ENChEeeNC DEPARTMENT. 4.-r: . , C! ANY AND ALL FELD CONDITIONS AND UTLITY LOCATIONS SHOULD BE FEW VERFED FND 11 48' L . 5 FT, SM SETBACK LW X891.9 0-1 PRIOR TO EXCAVATION CONSTRUCTION. 3. AT THE THE OF IF19 SURVEY, THE SHED LOCATED ON THE ADJOWC PROPERTY TO .'-4FT. 94 '--- LM �'Ibo'1_1334�9 (X),�33.78(Pj eqaq 't- 3b THE SOUTH OV NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A FOUNDATION. WOOD FE E -1 . x ­/ Fl-q4 c' 7'30 88q.7 4. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THS SURVEY. THE BEA2NCS ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED OREWATION AND THE "VATi" ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED DATUM (BENCHMARK. - AS SHOWN ON MAP). C-)GSTNC TWO-STORY WOOD FRAME HOUSE SHRUB LM" TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED N THE SOUTHEEAST CORNER OF WEST 619T STREET 6 r28 SR BROMVIEW AVE. AND BROOKVEW AVENUE. Fft-a95.6 CF�_M' ELEV 884.14 (WVD?q) AREA SUNINIARY Lit LOT 6, BLOCK 23, FAIRFAX. CROSS OULOW AREA 2,049 50. FT. OR 0.05 AC. HENNEPIN COUNTY. I hereby certify that this survey; plan or report was by direct 800 c Buller Square r"EWTA. (50 30. FT. OF THE COVERED PORCH ALLOWED PER CrTy COVE) Prepared me or under my supervision and 100 NofM Sbdh Street • that I am a duty licensed Land Surveyor under the L A N D F 0 R M 110ctiIIIIIIIIIII NET BULONG AREA Lqqq 50. FT. OR 0.05 AC. Iowa f the State Z;'20- of Minne • Wmneepab, MN SUM GARAGE FLOOR aq5.o Web: landflorm.net TOP OF BLOCK aq5_5 LOT 6 AREA -A 6,67q 50. FT. OR OX5 AC. FQST FLOOR 5%.1 44" 16 _jr 4+JkLOINC COVT:RACE, = 29.93% JONATHAN M. PITTMANN DahE 08113108 LOWEST FLOOR a 886.25 U-a'J Wm .N• 44647 R,4,& o8 Job No. JM503005 Drewhir Effrt,!15005-rev8 Ehr JMP '1 (7 Z BROOKVIE"I'll, Jackie Hoogenakker From: Stephanie Nelson [stephanie.b.nelson @hotmail.com] it: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:14 PM 10: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: C File B -09-01 Members of the Edina Zoning Board, This email is in response to. -the request of a 7.14 foot front yard set -back variance, Case File B- 09 -01, by JMS Custom Homes. I am a resident of Brookview Ave and I do not approve of this request. I do not want there to be a double standard in Edina, where builders can ask for forgiveness rather than permission. Respectfully, Stephanie Nelson 6133 Brookview Ave Edina MN 55424 Windows Live T`" Hotmail@: ... more than just e-mail. Check it out. 1/27/2009 Jackie Hoogenakker From: JOSEPH P,REV CLAY [marian.joe @msn.comj Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:09 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Letter to Zoning Board relative to the property at 6120 Brookview To the Zoning Board: We live at 6117 Brookview, directly across from the new house being built by JMS Custom Homes. First, we would like to voice our strong objections to any future subdivision of this lot! Next, we ask that the 7.14 foot front yard setback variance not be granted. Why should JMS be allowed to disregard the City Code? The house looks much too close to the street compared with adjoining houses! The actions of this company - disregard of city rules and neighbor's objections to cutting down an old historic tree, e.g. - qualify as unscrupulous! The house under construction towers over the homes surrounding it on all sides. It just doesn't "fit in "! Thank you for your consideration to our concerns. Rev. Joseph P. and Marian R. Clay 1/22/2009 Jackie Hoogenakker From: barbara nelson [barbellen6 @earthlink.net] :nt: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:12 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 6120 Brookview Avenue variance January 18, 2009 Barbara E Nelson 6137 Brookview Ave S Edina, MN 55424 City Hall Plaruling Department Zoning Board City Council Office of the Mayor 4301 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing in reference to the special meeting of the Edina Zoning Board for the purpose of determining whether JMS Custom Homes may receive a variance for the property at 6120 Brookview Avenue. I have lived across street and down a few houses on Brookview for 20 years. I am writing to express my opinion as a long -time resident that this situation on our street is a mess. The new home sticks out like e thumb. It may technically be within the legal setback of the side pro erty line (which was no doubt intended to apply to the average size homes on our block) but it looms large over the neighboring Edina historic home and looks awkward and oversized for its off - center position on the lot. On top of that JMS Builders are now requesting a variance for the front yard setback, which I am opposed to. These builders knew the requirements when they bought this lot and have pushed the limits already in many ways. The resulting problems are of their own making and cannot be considered hardships. What is happening with the other half of the lot? Any scenario that I can imagine is problematic. A bigger question is how did this company get as far as they did with this lot? I sincerely hope that something can be done to rectify the situation and prevent further impingements. If more laws are needed to prevent this from happening, then it is time to get them in place. The character of our neighborhood is at stake. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, arbara E Nelson 1/20/2009 January 21, 2009 Edina Zoning Board 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Lots 5 and 6, Block 23, Fairfax Our File No. 7878.4 Dear Board Members: (612) 672 -3696 jiawver@messerfikramer.com My wife and I live at 6121 Brookview Avenue and strongly oppose the variance requested by JMS Custom Homes (Case No. B- 09 -01). Frankly, Mr. Schoenwetter comes to you with unclean hands and any claims of financial hardship should fall on deaf ears. To understand my reasoning, it is necessary to provide some history. JMS purchased the subject property after a prior developer withdrew his request to subdivide the property. The neighboring property owners had vehemently opposed subdivision of the property. Seizing upon an opportunity, JMS gave Mrs. Anderson a lowball offer to purchase her home knowing she was vulnerable. JMS heard. from many of the neighbors including myself asking that he not only build a single home but try to save the beautiful oak tree that adorned the property. During Mr. Schoenwetter's conversations with the neighbors, he intimated he wanted to build two homes. The neighbors again advised this would be opposed. Subsequently, the existing home was sold and moved. The 200 year + old oak tree was removed and JMS surveyed the property and commenced construction of a home on the extreme south section of the property: As constructed, it dwarfs the neighboring homes and is so close to the Whitbecks' property line that all sense of privacy is lost. Prior to construction, I sent the attached letter to JMS advising them that their scheme of building the home first and then seeking to subdivide the property claiming some sort of hardship was ill conceived. The response was that I was misinformed and that they had no intensions of building a second home. Furthermore, we would be advised should he seek to subdivide. However, he continued his plan to circumvent the City of Edina's ordinances and neighbors' interest by seeking permission to subdivide through Hennepin County. This was denied (only after the county contacted the city). Board Members January 21, 2008 Page 2 It remains apparent to everyone Mr. Schoenwetter still intends to subdivide the property. No doubt, once the current home is built he will raise claims of economic hardship if he is not permitted to build a second home. What the hell? It looks weird to have the one home on top of one neighbor. Why not allow him to build the other one on top of the neighbor to the north to add balance? Besides he will add to the tax base. However, the law is clear a variance should not be permitted since the purported hardship is self- created. Why do I tell you this when the variance he seeks deals with a 7.1 ft violation of the front setback? If JMS and Mr. Schoenwetter understand that his intended subdivision will not be permitted, the economic hardships he now raises are greatly diminished. For the existing structure to make any sense and therefore have value to him or any buyer, it needs to be moved to the center portion of the property. This would satisfy the neighbors, improve the value of the structure and avoid protracted litigation which appears to be looming. It was a mistake of JMS to construct the house where. located to begin with. The problem has been exacerbated by constructing it without paying attention to the front setback requirements. This is not an inexperienced builder. He has built many homes in Edina and surrounding cities. JMS' website claims they are recognized for their commitment to the communities they serve. To the contrary, they are quickly gaining the reputation as a builder of oversized houses with total disregard of the neighbors' interest. The surveyor was acting as his agent. The Master is responsible for the agent's negligence. I too find fault in the city's failure to provide proper oversight on the project. All these wrongs cannot be made right by the granting of a variance. The neighborhood and in particular the Whitbecks continue to suffer by having this home situated completely in front of their house so as to block all views to the north. I encourage each of you to drive by the property. You will understand how utterly ridiculous it was for him to build the home where he did. JMS's arrogance and greed must not be rewarded by your granting this request for variance. The only way to prevent further suffering from .this awful situation is to deny the request and make it clear he will not be able to build a second home on the parcel. Respectfully, . Lawver JWUmpn Enclosure MESSERLI & KRAMER December 5, 2008 Jeffrey Schoenwetter JMS Custom Homes 5250 West 74th Street, Suite 8 Edina, MN 55439 Re: Fairfax, Block 23, Lot 5 and 6 Messerll 6 Kramer PA. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1800 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Mlnneapolla. Minnesota 55402.4218 main 612.672360D fax 612.672.3777 www.mes6arlikrarner.com Additional offices in:. St. Paul 6 Plymouth, -MN. Authorized to practice law in: Minnesota, Colorado: District of Columbia, Illinois, Missouri, Montana, New York. South Dakota end Wisconsin Writers contact:. (612) 672 -3698 jfawver@messerlikramer: com Dear Mr. Schoenwetter: My wife and I live at 6121 Brookview Avenue, Edina, Minnesota. Your firm acquired the property directly across from us, sold and moved the existing house and removed a beautiful oak tree in excess of 250 years old with the .stated purpose that you intended to build a single home upon the lot. Unfortunately, 1 returned from work yesterday and saw that your employees had staked off lines indicating your intent to build a home on the southern half of the property. It appears your intention is to subdivide the lot to .build a second home on the northern half of the property. You are aware that a prior developer attempted to subdivide the property to .allow construction of two homes on the site. This subdivision proposal garnered strong objection from the neighborhood. The builder subsequently withdrew his subdivision proposal and sold the property to your firm. It is my understanding that in order to subdivide the property a variance will be required. and I hope that the City Planning Department did not mislead you into thinking that this would be an easy process. Specifically, I do not believe you can legally establish that a hardship exists or if so it is self - induced. The property is currently' conforming and is well- suited for a single dwelling. If you intend to�seek a subdivision I would have preferred that you be, more direct and seek approval prior to,building on the south lot. Your tactic appears to be an effort to circumvent the due process afforded neighbors to object to proposed subdivisions: I am told your firm builds quality homes and .your website indicates that you have a commitment to the communities that you serve. Unless I am mistaken as, to your intentions, your tactic of trying to force the city and neighborhood to accept a subdivision of the lot by proceeding ..prior to obtaining the necessary approvals shows a total disregard to the interests of the neighborhood. I ask that you reconsider the proposed construction and return to the plan of building a single dwelling upon the property. fits! NGT aarranawonnwo6 Jeffrey Schoenwetter December 5, 2008 Page 2 Should you have any interests in discussing this matter, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully, MESSERLI & KRAMER P.A. o ep W. Lawver JWUmpn cc: Carey Teague Planning Commissioners 741673.1 Joseph W. Lawver From• Jeff Schoenwetter [Jeff @jmscompanies.comj Sent: • Friday, December 05, 2008 1:43 PM To: Joseph W. Lawver Cc: cteague @ci.edina.mn.us; dwmusic @comcast.net Subject: RE; Joe , I appreciate your correspondence . However-you are not completely informed. While we do understand our Property rights , we today are only building one home. Thanks for your interest . We'll try to build this home in 90 days as to minimize the noise and disruption , it promises to be a.great home. If you have a need to talk , just call, my office , and ask Darleen to set a conference call: appointment. Thanks for your interest. We'll keep you posted if we: lect to`subdivide. From: Joseph W. Lawver [ mailto :JLawver @MesserliKramer.com] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 10:46 AM To: Jeff Schoenwetter Cc: cteague @ci.edina.mn.us; dwmusic @comcast.net subject: FW: Mr. Shoenwetter; I would appreciate talking to you about this if you have a moment. Joe Lawver Messerli & Kramer PA 1800 Fifth Street Towers 150 South 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Direct Phone: 612 =672 -3698 Fax: .612-672-3777 ilawver messerlikramer.com Confidentiality Note: This e -mail message is forthe sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of any kind is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender via reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. IRS REQUIRED DISCLOSURE: The IRS requires us,to inform you that any federal tax advice in this email and any.attached documents is not intended or written to'be used, and cannot be Used, (1) for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties or (Z) promoting, marketing or recommending any transaction discussed in this communication to another person unless we expressly indicate otherwise. From: Mary P. Nygaard Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 10:30 AM 1 To: Joseph W. Lawver Subject: Mary Nygaard Legal Administrative Assistant Messerli & Kramer P.A. 1800 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Direct: 612 - 672 -3622 . Fax: 612 - 672 -3777 Email: mnysaardCcDmesserlikramer.com Website: www.messerlikramer.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of any kind is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender via reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Doug Nelson [dnelson @theminikandaclub.com] -it: Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:37 AM J: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 6120 brookview avenue City Hall Planning Department I am writing to announce my displeasure in how the City of Edina has allowed the construction of a house 7 feet closer to the road than allowed by Code. How exactly does something like this happen? I have always thought that permits must be applied for, plans shown, and the OK to proceed must be given by the City of Edina before someone proceeds with a project. Someone here (the City, the surveyor, JMS ? ? ?) has certainly made a mistake and I think it should be rectified and not allowed to be completed as is. I have no problem with someone building a nice home in the neighborhood but I do believe that City Codes should be followed. My property backs up to the pile of dirt that currently has a beautiful back hoe on the top. I am sure this is the location of the second home JMS plans to build.....once they have pushed their way past the CITY on this project. I will be out of town during the hearing but I certainly hope that the Board Members have a chance to review the property and the issues at hand. Doug Nelson 6117 Oaklawn Ave Edina, MN 55424 1/22/2009 January 22, 2009 Edina Zoning Board 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Board Members, My husband and I live at 6104 Brookview Ave. and are writing in response to a letter we received from the city concerning Lot 6, Block 23, Fairfax. We strongly oppose the variance requested by JMS Custom Homes. We find it difficult to understand how a builder of such supposed repute would fail to catch an error of 7.14 feet front yard setback, and why the home is being built as close as possible to the Southern lot edge. This lot, or actually lots 5 & 6, has been of concern since the winter of 2008 when Grace Anderson's home was purchased by a developer with the intent to subdivide. For reasons unknown to us the property was sold to JMS Custom Homes. Suddenly the existing home was removed and a majestic 250+ year old oak tree cut down. Now a huge structure is being erected whose upper —level windows peer directly into our backyard; three lots away! We never had privacy concerns before because all of the homes were of similar stature. A recent Star Tribune article "Come Home to Edina" (1/11/09) chronicled how young couples who had been raised in Edina and wanted to return to raise their own families were unable to do so because of limited affordable homes. Mayor Hovland was quoted as saying, "Young families are part of Edina's "cycle of life "" Diverse demographics help create strong communities; allowing developers to replace solidly built starter homes with over -sized expensive home does not accomplish this intrinsic goal for the community. Perhaps the larger issue is: Are we as a community really welcoming to diverse demographics? As residents on this block, we have followed all available avenues to voice our concern about our neighborhood. And yet, the proceedings on use of the aforementioned property seemed less than transparent, vague and no Now we are supposed to support a request for an oversight that very obviously should have been caught immediately. What next will be asked of the neighborhood? Our hands are tied. We do not, and will not support this variance. Sincerely, Trudy and Bill Landgren Edina residents and community taxpayers for 33 years January 21, 2009 Edina Zoning Board 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Lots 5 and 6, Block 23, Fairfax Dear Board Members: My wife and I live at 6143 Brookview Avenue and strongly oppose the variance requested by JMS Custom Homes. The house that has been built clearly does not fit into the neighborhood and is quite apparent that the builder plans on subdividing the lot. We were opposed to the previous builder's request to subdivide the lot. The builder also removed the beautiful 250 year old oak tree which is also very upsetting. JMS Homes seems to be trying to subdivide the lot without going through proper procedures and is now asking for a variance. The Whitbecks who live on the south side of the house have very carefully restored the old historic farm house in which they live. It is quite insulting to have a huge house built next door without any regard for the character of the neighborhood. Before building the present house, he removed the old house and transported it to another location. We would like to see this current house also moved and a single family house be built on the lot. Please deny his request for a variance to build another house on the property. Please contact me if you have further questions. My cell phone is 952- 201 -7031. S ncerely, R y M onen c: Planning Commission City Council Members Mayor 1/21/09 Edina Zoning Board 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Your file # B -09 -01 Dear Board Members, Before I go into detail, I must ask you to please drive by our home as soon as possible. My wife and I live at 6128 Brookview Ave and we strongly oppose any variance given to JMS builders for 6120 Brookview.Ave. On December 8, 2008 my wife, Jackie, emailed the Edina Planning Commission and City Council an extensive description of our opposition and did not here one word in response. Further, a District Court Judge lifted a "stop work" order a while ago. I was told by Mr Teague that it was temporary and that there would be a formal hearing later. I asked why we were not informed of the first hearing and he said they only got about an hour notice. So what ?!! Then we discover that a 2 "d hearing was held and, once again, we were not informed. The failure of the city to inform us of this 2 "d hearing as well as the first basically denied us our right to due process. Now for some history: Before construction began at 6120 Brookview Ave, then president of JMS (the builder) came to our home to try to sell us on the idea of two homes (a subdivision) instead of one enormous home. The drawing of the single home looked like it would cover the lot from end to end. We told him we would not support subdividing the lot. (This same guy was at the hearing we all attended to object to the previous developer's attempt to subdivide so he knew how we felt.) Shortly before construction began, JMS came to us with a supposed new "vision" for the property. He said he wanted to build two homes on the property. We told him we were interested in seeing one nice home and saving the oak tree. He then began to offer us several "deals ". He offered to sell us 25 feet at $3,000.00 per foot. He said he would then build next to our neighbor to the north instead of next to us. Or, if he sold it to that neighbor first, then the house would be 5 feet from us. He also suggested that maybe the neighborhood should get together and buy the entire lot and use it for a "park ". His parting comment was, "If I save the oak tree, will you let me build two houses? He later approached other neighbors as well. In mid August, plans were submitted for a single home. Near the end of November / beginning of December, a survey was done again and laid out a subdivision. When the surveyors finished, it was clear that he was planning on two lots for two houses. My wife went to city hall to look at the plans. The plan for a large single home in the middle of the lot was gone and in its place a plan was submitted (dated November 26) to build a large home on just 50 feet. The builder was proceeding as if he was already granted a subdivision. Jackie asked the planning dept if there was anything we could do to stop this as it is obvious he is planning on a subdivision. Jackie was told he has a 100 foot lot, he can build where he wants. Both Joe Lawver and I wrote JMS to express our concern. Jackie called the city inspector and was told by him that JMS had an administrative subdivision for'the property. Jackie told the inspector she thought he was mistaken. The city inspector said he would check and get back to her. He did call back 30 minutes later and informed Jackie that the city attorney informed him that he (the inspector) was wrong and that JMS did not have a subdivision. Jackie asked the inspector if JMS had led him to believe they had a subdivision and the inspector said, "yes ". On January 5, 2009 we met with city planner, Cary Teague, to inform him of all the shenanigans going on and to discuss the set back. Jackie told him she felt there was no way the set back was according to code. The city then discovered the set back was wrong. A "Stop Work" order was issued by the city because the new house has an improper set back by 7 feet. The builder, JMS, went to district court and got the judge to lift the "stop work" order. This, according to Mr Teague, was a temporary injunction and he told me a more formal hearing would be held soon. It is important for me to reiterate that none of us were advised by the city that this was going to court.....either time. According to Mr Teague, JMS claimed to the court that if he did not have the house ready for the parade of homes, he would go out of business. This guy is bullying his way through this entire project. You know that he will ask for a subdivision next. Why else would he build on just half of the existing lot? In fact, JMS tried to circumvent approval from the city for a subdivision by going to Hennepin County instead. Hennepin County called Edina and told the guy no deal. They can take down the house (there is precedence for this) or move it to a proper location or cut off front 7 feet and put the garage on the north side of the home. Anyway you look at this, the current location of this house is WRONG. 2 We rely on or city officials to hold people to the letter of the law and protect its citizens. Please help us in this matter. Respectfully, Dick Whitbeck °6128 Brookview Ave Edina, MN 55424 952- 926 -9927 3 1/22/09 Edina Zoning Board 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Your file # B -09 -01 Dear Board Members, I am completely against any variance being awarded to JMS Construction for the building at 6120 Brookview Ave. JMS has foolishly placed the home they are building on the extreme boundaries of their 100 foot lot. Not only does it look ridiculous, it promises to deliver a host of problems for my husband and I. The house that previously occupied the lot was positioned slightly under 40 feet from the side of the lot and slightly more than 40 feet from the front of the lot. This new house is set so far forward that the back of the house ends before the front of our house even begins. The house is so close to us that with this new altered grade, water diversion and snow accumulation are imminent problems. Our 40 + year old hedge is right in line with snow slides from the steep roof. Our driveway was not shown on the survey. It is right next to the side of our lot. It is gravel and therefore water diversion is no small issue here. We have lost our privacy, lost our view of the park, lost the charm and continuity of our neighborhood and probably lost property value as well. Who is going to compensate us for this loss? For JMS to build in this manner in the first place is beyond all measure of rudeness and greed. NQXARIANCE! _.__._..._....__ Jackie W:hn tbeck 6128 Broo view Ave Edina, 55424 952- 922 -5045 1/21/09 Edina Zoning Board 4801 West 50`x' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Board Members, The attached email was sent to the Planning Commission and City Council December 8, 2008 regarding construction on 6120 Brookview Ave. No one ever replied, to me. Jac 'e 'tbeck 612 B ookview Ave Edina, MN 55424 Wed, Jan 21, 2009 3:16'PIM Subject: Subdivision - Please Help! Attn: Members of the Edina Planning Comm' ommission and City Council Date: Monday,,' 8, 2008 12:07 PM From: Dick Whitbeck <dwmusic@comcast.net> To: <ed'inamail @ci.edina.mn.us> Conversation° Subdivision = Please Help! Attn: Members of the Edina Planning Commission and ,City Council To the members of'the.Edina Planning Commission and City Council: This summer our neighborhood residents appeared before the planning commission in a rattier lengthy meeting to try to prevent a developer from subdividing a 100, foot lot at 6120' Brookview Ave. The reasons for our opposition to this subdivision were many. 1).: Subdivision to -a 50 foot lot may have been suitable for the 1950s size homes but not for the larger homes built today. Jamm ing up two large homes on two small ,lots would not represent progress but simply manifest greed at the expense of the neighbors. 2) Our home (adjacent to the lot in discussion) is possibly the first house built in Edina in the 1860s.It was argued that it would be prudent to preserve one of the last remaining truly historical "pockets" in the city. Mayor Jim Hovland presented us with the Edina Heritage Award for Historical Preservation. A subdivision adjacent to us would reduce this historic site to an aesthetic joke. 3.) Preservation of a majestic oak tree between 200 and 300 years old. A hallmark of the ,neighborhood 4) -Many lots on our street are larger than 50 feet. 5) Protection from an eyesore for there is not one house on our block the size of the proposed new home. 6.) Excavating 5 feet from our property line could prove a disaster as the subxoil structure on our lot is sand. Many other considerations were offered forth as well. in short, environmental, aesthetic, functional and preservation of our property values were in consideration. The planning commission debated the proposal and the'issue was dismissed. The developer realized the neighborhood was passionate about preserving,the integrity of our community and withdrew. Unknown to us, the president of JMS Builders was at this meeting. JMS soon purchased the property. Jeffrey M Shoenwetter, owner of JMS, met with many of the neighbors to propose a subdivision plan once again. All who were approached firmly apposed. Subsequently, JMS submitted a plan for one house on the property. We thought the conflict was over. Not to be. The beautiful oak tree was destroyed. On December 4, I noticed anew survey appearing to stake out the 100.fo6t lot into two 50 foot lots. I went to city hall to inquire about plans for the property. As expected, plans were for one home to be built on only 50 feet of the lot. Speaking with Kris Aaker about this I was told there was nothing the city could do about where a builder decides to place a home on the property if within legal guidelines. Page 1 of 2 It is fairly transparent as to what is going on here. JMS is creating its own subdivision for future development without applying for a subdivision permit denying all voices to heard. JMS is clearly disregarding and disrespecting all the neighbors on our block. Th is an abuse of the spirit and intent of the city's building codes. Whether one lopsided home on a 100 foot lot or two homes on each 50 foot lot becomes a reality, the developer will have destroyed the aesthetic continuity of yet another neighborhood in Edina. I am looking for help and guidance to protect our neighborhood. I am just sick that JMS can manipulate the system at all of our expense. I implore you. Is there anything that can be done before our neighborhood is forever ruined? Respectfully yours, Jackie whitbeck 6128 Brookview Ave Edina, MN 55424 952 - 922 -5045 Page 2 of 2 January 22, 2009 Edina Zoning Board 4801 W. 50' St. Edina, MN. 55424 Property Address: 6120 Brookview Avenue Legal Description: Lots 5 and 6, Block 23 Fairfax Dear Board Members: The Edina Historical Society's records indicate that my house was built in 1930. I've lived here at 6112 Brookview since 1974. This year marks 35 years of being an Edina resident and.taxpayer, current volunteer at Fairview Hospital, former ESL instructor in the 80's and I served on the Human Rights and Relations Commission for 10 years, from 1995 -2005. Most of my employment has also been in the City of Edina. I guess you could say I have "roots" here. I take this current situation very seriously and strongly oppose the variance requested by JMS Custom Homes (Case No. B -09 -01 and. any future request to subdivide the property in order to build a second home. When my next door neighbor of over 30 years, felt the need to move from her home in May of 2008, I knew that change was on the way. The first interested developer planned to remove the home and build 2 smaller homes on the 100 foot lot. In order to do this he had to show financial hardship for a variance to build 2 houses. We, as a neighborhood, proved successful in blocking this project and he rescinded his plans. JMS Custom Homes became involved in this project last summer, buying the property and moving the .existing home. They, too,,,wanted to build 2. houses and surveyed all ;of us in the neighborhood. Again, we vocalized that we would not approve any project for two homes. JMS then submitted plans to the City of Edinai for one house that would be built in the center of the property. We had hopes that they would not remove the healthy old oak tree in the front yard.. JMS removed this tree. Then, after surveying the property, and without requesting variances., or communicating with.any of us, ahnost overnight, they rescinded their earlier plans and began building a house right next to the Whitbeck's on the southern most part of the lot which to anyone would appear to mean that their intent is to build 2 houses. This new home hides the Whitbeck's charming historic home. 1 How could JMS build this house without submitting new plans and without paying attention to front setback requirements? If the surveyor was acting as his agent, then they are also involved. I am also concerned about the height of this house. Is it a legal height? If you will review the December 30, 2008 Planning Commission meeting video, you will note that when discussing the referenced property, the word "subdivision" is mentioned. How can that be? Did the city approve the "subdivision" without notifying nearby neighbors? Lastly, I have concerns about the possible building of a second home that will be placed near my garage and home. It was noted during the construction digging that the soil would "give away." Did this developer complete soil testing before beginning this project? Yours truly, Carol Carmichiel CC /c Enclosure: 10 photos 2 Op, - y RUA. OCK-vo,e tq%n OOK -VeRo '�� a f od<V \2vJ my vlevJ CA ntvJ CAQ\\Q.) �S�Q, rzpt0,p� �. oc� �rc,2c;� garoge p r �1 i �ccx� o-c re.� `mouse pt0 X�ca���'�0 Wh��bec�1� to Available 'Zil -14 ".i-1 I ly �e S%Ae pr YTOCN ■TOCK $TO - 4 pr Miroslava (N ickie) Turk 6141 Brookview Avenue Edina, MN Zoning Board 4801 W. 50'. St. Edina, MN 55424 January 22, 2009 Dear Zoning Board Members, My name is Miroslava (Mickie) Turk. and I reside at 6141 Brookview Avenue, Edina, MN, down the street from the construction site of 6120 Brookview Avenue, Edina, MN/Fairfax, Block 23 Lot 5 and 6. I am writing you today because I am concerned about cagey tactics JMS Construction is using in constructing their house. Originally the owner inquired around the neighborhood, ascertaining the feelings and mood of the homeowners regarding the kind of house we would like to see built on the acquired lot. He found out everyone was deeply opposed to having two large, two -story houses crushed together on the 100 -foot lot. Afterwards, the owner submitted a plan for a single large house to sit in the middle of the lot. During this time JMS had applied to Hennepin County for a subdivison variance, which was turned down and brought to the attention of the City of Edina. Later, he surveyed his lot for two houses to be built side by side. He then resubmitted his building plan to build a house on the south side of the lot. Unfortunately he started building the house approximately six feet too close to the south side and next to the Whitbeck historic home, and also too close to the street by approximately six feet. The city granted JMS a permit, based on the surveyor's report and drawings. The surveyor made a huge mistake, knowingly or unknowingly, but which the Whitbecks found and brought to the attention of the City Planner. Shortly after, the.city issued a stop work order. This stop work order was followed up by a TRO on January 8, then in court on January 13 and 15,_ an evidentiary hearing was held for JMS, on the merits of the case. Shockingly, the Whitbecks, whose house is most affected by the too -close building of the new construction, were not invited to testify. JMS has already imposed a hardship on the Whitbecks, cutting off their view of the park, and I feel strongly that by submitting and implementing plans to build a house outside the legal guidelines, JMS is presenting the neighborhood and city with a fait accompli. A way to eventually make room for a subdivision variance; to advance plans to build another house —too big and again too close, to another large house. I respectfully ask that the Zoning Board not reward JMS for breaking the law. I believe the new JMS construction needs to be moved, or demolished. The surveyor may be responsible for the expenses, unless he was misled by JMS, who may have told him that he already had a subdivision variance. Respectfully, Miroslava (Mickie) T/uurr�k/J _ Cal CO, A�- re (Z- k o (j, se- -,) (� January 22, 2009 To: Edina Zoning Board Members /City Council Members Mayor Jim Hovland/City Manager Gordon Hughes Edina Planning Commission Members Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Case File B -09 -01 Issue of 7.14 ft. front setback variance and JMS Custom Homes, LLC Lots 5 and 6, Block 23, Fairfax (6120 Brookview Ave.) To all the above persons, We (Janey Westin and Charlie Hughes) live at 6136 Brookview Ave., two doors south of 6120. Every time we step out onto our driveway or froAt stoop, we are horrified at the monstrosity that is being built in full view (complete length of the home from its front to the back) only one neighbor away, to the north of us. We absolutely oppose any kind of variance of this property for Mr. Jeffrey M. Schoenwetter of JMS Custom Homes, LLC. Every step of the way, from how the home was purchased, up to today when the siding is being put on, has been carried out with callous disregard for the neighborhood, its environment and history; disregard for the city's setback code and ordinances; and, we believe, dishonesty when working with the city planning depart- ment. In May of 2008, JMS swooped in to take advantage of a vulnerable widow in purchasing the original home for $300,000 after the first builder, Navid Pouladian, backed out of a $330,000 purchase deal. Hennepin County's listed fair market value for the original home was $350,800. In early fall, the house and separate 2 car garage were both picked up and moved during the night early one week. The full basement of 8 ft. depth sat for the rest of the week with junk from the garage and the demolished back deck thrown into it. No fencing of any kind was put around it. There are 5 small children that live across the street and a few doors to the north. I called city inspections on Friday to report my concerns. A fence of flimsy support was finally placed around the basement in the afternoon of the following Monday - -6 days late, and a clear violation of ordinance. After earth moving equipment and a dumpster showed up and disposed of the basement remains, an unfenced pit of at least 4 foot depth was left until early December -- another danger to neighborhood kids, as well as ordinance violation. We also called city inspections about this on December 3rd. In early October, Mr. Schoenwetter himself was visiting the now homeless lot. I (Janey) expressed concerns to him about a beautiful, 42" diameter trunk, 81 ft. span burr oak tree that the previous home had been built off to the side of. I stated the value of the tree, how it was an asset to the lot, and how beautifully a single - family 1 1/2 story home could be placed under it. Mr. Schoenwetter then proceeded to make a verbal offer to sell the south 25' to me and the neighbors for $100,000 to. save the tree. Ten minutes prior to this, he was making verbal offers of different footage to the Whitbecks who live directly to the south at 6128 in the oldest (18 66) historic home in the city. Mr. JMS did not reveal to either the Whitbecks or me that he had already submitted plans to the city for a very large single home on Aug. 13th. (See Doc. B, Cetif. of Survey, revision history). On October 16 and 17, when the Whitbecks were out of town (Teacher's Convention - -no school), JMS had the tr( butchered and hauled away. (See Doc. A, photo) There was not one portion of rot anwhere in the whole tree. Was the timing of this removal just a coincidence with the Whitbeck's absence? The day after the city was called about the unfenced pit on Dec. 3rd, new stakes were placed on the south half of the lot (only on lot 6) with the dividing line between lots 5 and 6 clearly marked. JMS's intentions became alarmingly clear to us; to build a home wholely on one half of the 100 ft. lot, and then build a second one on the north half. The neighborhood had not been notified of any application for variance to divide. At this point, Joe Lawver at 6121 Brookview wrote a letter to the city regarding concerns about this. We have since learned that JMS had approached the county to ask for a subdivision, hoping to avoid proper legal procedure of doing this through the city. The county contacted the city of Edina questioning it, and was told that JMS cannot do that. One of the more vexing parts of this whole mess is that when JMS submitted the certificate of survey to the city for his second proposed home at 6120, the legal description given is "Lot 6, Block 23," etc. Only measure- ments for Lot 6 are shown and outlined in bold. No location of the previous home is given. Please compare this survey (Doc.B) with a previous survey (Doc C.) which was used by Navid Pouladian when applying for a vari- ance to subdivide 6120 last Spring. Document C is dated 1- 25 -08. Compare this with dates of 8 -13 -08 and revised date of 11 -24 -08 on Document B. Both surveys were performed by Landform. By all appearances, it seems that JMS has clearly misrepresented the truth to both the surveyor and the City of Edina as far as whet' he had a variance to divide. Let's call a spade a spade here. Isn't this illegal ?! It is also equally disturbing that the Planning Dept. apparently did not question this fact. Even the notice sent to local property owners about the Jan. 28 Special meeting of the Edina Zoning Board describes the lot as "Lot 6, Block23", excluding Lot 5! People representing the Planning Dept. told the Whitbecks more than once that JMS had an "administrative subdivision ". What is going on here ?? On Jan. 20, 2009 I had a confirmation from Mitzi Wicklund in Assessing that there is NOT and NEVER has been a subdivision of the said lot (see Doc.D). This was also stated in a meeting that we (Jackie Whitbeck, Janey Westin and Charlie Hughes) had with Kris Aaker in Planning 2 weeks before. Now, we finally get to the direct issue of the setback from the street. The city code as written in Subd. 7 Special Requirements in addition to Subsection 850.07, may be lengthy, but not "ambiguous" and "vague" as argued by JMS in court on Jan. 13 and 15, 2009. Charlie and I had no problem figuring it out when we built a 1 1/2 story garage 2 years ago, and we are not builders by profession. We believe JMS is fully aware of what the setback codes are, especially given the fact that JMS has built a number of homes in Edina prior to this. For example, there are two in the Country Club District, one on Bruce Ave. at 4608, the other on Drexel Ave., both in the last few years. Both of those homes raised great concerns as JMS appears to have pushed the limits of and violated the intention of-the city building codes, with little consideration of neighbors. At 6120 Brookview, JMS has clearly crossed the line by placing the home 7.14 feet too close to the street. No consideration WHATSOEVER has been shown for the historic merits of the home at 6128 Brookview Avenue, or the Q Whitbeck family that lives there. The back wall of the JMS monstrosity is FURTHER FORWARD than the front north corner of the Whitbeck home! (see Doc.B). To allow this structure to proceed sets a very dangerous precedence for future homes built in Edina, especially by a builder such as JMS. So far, it seems that if the builder doesn't like the rules, he can do whatever he wants as long as the Planning Dept. doesn't catch their misrepresentation or gross violation of building code right away. In addition, JMS argued in court Jan. 13 and 15 that "...non- participation [in the Parade of Homes] and the existence of the partially completed Home would harm JMS's reputation and would likely put JMS out of busi- ness." Through searching on the internet, it seems to be quite apparent that Mr. Schoenwetter's financial prob- lems are not rooted in his project at 6120 Brookview Ave.: -- -- According to the Star Tribune, April 21, 2008, in "Part I, Minnesota's New Gost Towns ", (see Doc.E) JMS Homes was already in trouble with a "master - planned community" called Martin Farms in Otsego, Wright County, MN. Schoenwetter is quoted, "Builders were part of the problem." - - -- In the Mpls. /St.Paul Business Journal of June 10, 2008 (see Doc. F) it is reported that Schoenwetter's Martin Farms development and a Lakeville development called "Tullamore" were taken possession of by Wells Fargo Bank. Schoenwetter is quoted, "...it made sense to let the bank take over." -- - -In the April 4, 2008 posting of the Mpls. /St.Paul Business Journal (see Doc. G) it is reported that Anchor Bancorp had begun foreclosure proceedings on JMS Co.'s 25,000 sq. ft. office building at 6889 Rowland Road in Eden Prairie. A sheriff's sale of the building was scheduled for May 9, 2008. - - -- The Star Tribune, Nov. 30, 2008 reported in a listing of Business Bankruptcies (see Doc. H) that two businesses under the auspices of Jeffrey M. Schoenwetter had filed for Chapter 11 bankrupty on Nov. 17, 2008. They are Savage Development I and H. As you can see, Mr. Schoenwetter, who seems to operate under multiple business names, (of which JMS Custom Homes, LLC is just one), has a trail of immense financial problems preceding the issues we are now dealing with at 6120 Brookview Ave. They are NO EXCUSE for multiple violations of the city code. (This includes being woken up by workers' activities many mornings long before 7:00 a.m. - -yet another violation!) If JMS had conducted this project in an honest and ethical manner in the first place, he would have been able to make his deadline for the Parade of Homes. We believe he has brought ALL of these problems upon himself. JMS has moved one home from this lot before. HE CAN DO IT AGAIN! It should be placed in the middle of the lot with a proper setback. JMS should also be required to plant at least six new burr oaks to replace the one cut down. We ask that the City of Edina also ban Mr. Jeffrey M. Schoenwetter from any future building or additons under any business name within the city limits for the next 50 years. Would you want him building a home next to you? Sincerel- Janey V Charlie N ;+ ♦ •Iu. J � � .•i I r J� �. • : r • �- ,ice - •.{.1�'•.1��, t - •'` rte,, :f . � _ ♦Y� '_"iCiti'�[ �''. vr" ' ` _ /•�' ~?i•. 't '•�z �•-` '�'- .- a- .yes -i' - * -�C�t i � i t �, � �'> , _4 � _ x . �►: h� T it I P_.4t. ri �' - tom' _� •� ' �- ' r 1 R > �. .. -~ ., ;t' ✓ �'.'� .' -r ♦� "fir �,• _ .�w !f.••„'�, y ` � �'1. '•�Z - �' i _ 461 .• 1• ` . • � -a4• `.cam *W21 r } t A• _ J CERT is -ICATE OF SURVEY FOR: BPAVUPA CONSTRUCTION 3Y u 'r / t o 0 3 % j EXSrwG N89 °47 � _ ` 'o. Flo a GARAGE GFE =106.0 30 ^ iLLTPLE 5TEM 6FT. SIDE SETBACK LINE - -� UNKNOWN GARAGE . o' 5HRUB: LINE -" 14' SPOV -a O 61.1 > Q ma3 5 Oi -• .-- 26.0 T V IDD 1.70 • - to (((g��T a m dl h J - e u m co O r 00 9' HARD MAPLE 4F1. WOOD FENCE` L - _ _ _._ _ _ _ _ `TEND P OPEN 6FT. SIDE SETBACK LINE -- - cc) EXISTNG AND PROPOSED ' DECK 0j LOT LINE -'_, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'SS MULTIPLE STEM 4' SPRUCE Dv�l,� ►ney�� C I EXI5TNG ly'v -7TORY WOOD ME F A HOUSE 6112 BROOK VIEW AVE. FFE =107.4 BOX ELDER pRopOSED n= -STORY - WOOD FRAI'M HOUSE o ' 7 a, 6177 BROCKVIEW AVE OI '22.3 .42 OAK ii of .• v nm I.Tr 23.00 - ryIn n ' - ---- - --- -- 36.6 ', -- -- -- ry - V m H o _FENCE AND SIJED,CORNER 3 (�j In ' is ON LOT LINE 48' OAK >' 2 SHRUB LNE', ' 36.00 q- SPRUCE I SHED �__:� ___ ___________-t FNO P OPEN 'FD P 4 6FT. SIDE SETBACK LINE — uT 30 -. ` -4F7. WOOD FENICE 4 6 5NE0 ' 133.69(M) 133.78(P) 0 6FT. `MOOD FENICE N89e47'30 "W s s 1. Iz LL i�� �-y 13 C. I E %LSTNG AME HTORY / SArAhJ 01 3 WOOD FRANE HOUSE \ $N4RUB LPIE -' 1 I L 6128 BROOKVIEW AVE. I 4IYI =99.61 FFE =105.5 GFE =104.9 \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 5 and 6, Block 23, FAIRFAX, Hennepin County, MnneSOL0. NORTH SCALIEL I " =20' SITE SYMBOLS: EXISTING DESCRIPTION EXISTING OE5CRPTION BUILDING 0 POWERPOLE' I CANOPY / OVERHANG AC AIR CONDITIONER CONCRETE SURFACE ELECTRIC METER erl ® MARKED IN CONCRETE 011LA'9NOU5 SURFACE t /2" X 14' ' I RON PIPE 0 SET WITH PLASTIC GAP GRAVEL SURFACE ® MONUMENT IRON MONUMENT FOUND X2,7 CONTOUR 8'5AN > SANITARY SEWER LINE ,123.4 SPOT ELEVATION 6'WTR WATER MAN CONCRETE CURB —`OT— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE Ilf —OTV— OVERHEAD TV �u T. TYOE 'EC"T• rvPE FENCING — ✓E -- OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES —y.— / —�- WOOD RETAINING O NOTE NUMBER WALL DISTANCE PER 5HRUD (P) RECORDED PLAT TREES (M) MEASURED DISTANCE MANHOLE NOTES: I. THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO T)e BRICK LEDGE. 2. PROVDED 0Y THE WATERMAIN OF UTILITY DNA E�R� DEPARTMENT. FROM MAPS 3. O NOT SURVEY, THE- HAVE FOUNDATION. SHED LOCATED THE ADJONNG PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH D 4, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY, THE BEARNGS ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED ORIENTATION AND THE ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED DATUM (BENCHMARK AS SHOWN ON MAP). I hereby certify that this survey. plan or report wos prepared by me or under my.direct supervision and (hat 1 am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the lays of the Stote of Minnesota J6nuLlmn M. PKLn DGLC 1/25/08 . Lcense. No. 44647 Reveed a. " ADZ 800C BUTLER SQUARE WMinn NORTH 8TH STREET Minneapolis, MN 55403 -1610 www.landform.net Job No. BVC08003 Drovnq.- bndr8VC003.dvg By: JRG 'r L' N, jV 5 UB LINE -/ S3.8p( 5 Flo a Z,Y 30 ^ DAP k17005 . o' 14' SPOV -a > Oi -• .-- 26.0 T V IDD 1.70 to - e u m co O r - N 9' HARD MAPLE .0i, BOX ELDER pRopOSED n= -STORY - WOOD FRAI'M HOUSE o ' 7 a, 6177 BROCKVIEW AVE OI '22.3 .42 OAK ii of .• v nm I.Tr 23.00 - ryIn n ' - ---- - --- -- 36.6 ', -- -- -- ry - V m H o _FENCE AND SIJED,CORNER 3 (�j In ' is ON LOT LINE 48' OAK >' 2 SHRUB LNE', ' 36.00 q- SPRUCE I SHED �__:� ___ ___________-t FNO P OPEN 'FD P 4 6FT. SIDE SETBACK LINE — uT 30 -. ` -4F7. WOOD FENICE 4 6 5NE0 ' 133.69(M) 133.78(P) 0 6FT. `MOOD FENICE N89e47'30 "W s s 1. Iz LL i�� �-y 13 C. I E %LSTNG AME HTORY / SArAhJ 01 3 WOOD FRANE HOUSE \ $N4RUB LPIE -' 1 I L 6128 BROOKVIEW AVE. I 4IYI =99.61 FFE =105.5 GFE =104.9 \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 5 and 6, Block 23, FAIRFAX, Hennepin County, MnneSOL0. NORTH SCALIEL I " =20' SITE SYMBOLS: EXISTING DESCRIPTION EXISTING OE5CRPTION BUILDING 0 POWERPOLE' I CANOPY / OVERHANG AC AIR CONDITIONER CONCRETE SURFACE ELECTRIC METER erl ® MARKED IN CONCRETE 011LA'9NOU5 SURFACE t /2" X 14' ' I RON PIPE 0 SET WITH PLASTIC GAP GRAVEL SURFACE ® MONUMENT IRON MONUMENT FOUND X2,7 CONTOUR 8'5AN > SANITARY SEWER LINE ,123.4 SPOT ELEVATION 6'WTR WATER MAN CONCRETE CURB —`OT— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE Ilf —OTV— OVERHEAD TV �u T. TYOE 'EC"T• rvPE FENCING — ✓E -- OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES —y.— / —�- WOOD RETAINING O NOTE NUMBER WALL DISTANCE PER 5HRUD (P) RECORDED PLAT TREES (M) MEASURED DISTANCE MANHOLE NOTES: I. THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO T)e BRICK LEDGE. 2. PROVDED 0Y THE WATERMAIN OF UTILITY DNA E�R� DEPARTMENT. FROM MAPS 3. O NOT SURVEY, THE- HAVE FOUNDATION. SHED LOCATED THE ADJONNG PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH D 4, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY, THE BEARNGS ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED ORIENTATION AND THE ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED DATUM (BENCHMARK AS SHOWN ON MAP). I hereby certify that this survey. plan or report wos prepared by me or under my.direct supervision and (hat 1 am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the lays of the Stote of Minnesota J6nuLlmn M. PKLn DGLC 1/25/08 . Lcense. No. 44647 Reveed a. " ADZ 800C BUTLER SQUARE WMinn NORTH 8TH STREET Minneapolis, MN 55403 -1610 www.landform.net Job No. BVC08003 Drovnq.- bndr8VC003.dvg By: JRG CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY �oG u m end 8� ',.- - �.. w.>.:',c;:�,��. �� •� FOR JMS CUSTOM HOMES Z S-ro�'� BULDNG F1 POWERPOLE FND P PNLT•ED'T REVISION NOV 2 5 200H�„T„ f FHDp �.. ' 08/13/08 - 'RCK'L 09/07/08 ' - REVISED FQINOATION ELEVAT1019 889.2 • EXISTNG 1jY9 -S10RY I- t �. 09/0/08 - CLENT COMIENTS FIRST FLOOR (THRESHOLD) = 8%.2 WOOD F ArE HOII$E 4 112 BROOK VEW AVE. _ 1 - - ^ 10/01/08 - CTfY COITENTS W /30/oa - NEW OLEONG PLANS 0 TOP OF POURED FOUNDATION = 895.7 FFE=097.3 I ♦1/11(08 . - NEW BLLONG PLANS SCALE IN FEET > ' _':: / ®/08 - NEW BLLONC PLANS 11/24/08 - NEW EdLONC AND ADJI'T LOCATION I tpPM�. L v L g :' °•j �� N• (jrLtinu a Pt8s1 °" I QD rB95.9 F '! r• ,.:Vi¢ -- WATER YWW II GRAVEL SURFACE O % � .. -or- ovERf+a:AV TELEPHONE 1V ' - XISTWG .. G. �f ....'J�.. `v 4j' ,�'..: N ... 1 Exl$rNC DESCRPTI(AN EXISING DESCRIPTION [ _ - _ ■09?x7 .Y -.. % GARAGE ' GFE =B %.J: 15.7 ',.- - �.. w.>.:',c;:�,��. _ BULDNG F1 POWERPOLE FND P PNLT•ED'T •rTAYPLE f FHDp 9.6. 889.2 Ty CANOPY OVERHANG �__._- L / � AIR CONDITIONER .. - d' 9r .O S1EfT GAP / 009 \. UT&NOWN ep 0_ ;,1` x895.7. -.�.._ , _ q., .� -.',,_ . ELECTRIC METER CONCRETE SURFACE Ell EXlSTNG GARAGE SOD yg0.5 4 .895.4 +894.6 ..593.914' SPRUCE n• I ' «. 92.5 - _ ' ,: TYPE ter IRON nf71AR7ENT FOIPD e °s I Soeuo LNE-' F rading and s i > 1 ' ''S. L 1 ' 811UMNOU$ SURFACE " -B' oArN-.,._.. SANITARY SEWER LNE I tpPM�. L v L g :' °•j �� N• (jrLtinu a Pt8s1 °" I q o' .. � - '' -_ '! r• ,.:Vi¢ -- WATER YWW II GRAVEL SURFACE f' 1� required prior to I � .. -or- ovERf+a:AV TELEPHONE 1V ' any grad4t; I L a - CONTOUR -07V- OVERHEAD B .1[ al2er;nc� SILT FENCING IS andla drainage - 123.4 SPOT ELEVATION --0E- OVERHEAD UTILITY LBNE5 .B9s.6 - n �-- ""'�9y : I ;. .. CONCRETE CURB O NOTE NUMBER 5 FT. SOE LMIE--. S89.47 _I _ 4FT. WOOD - '----- FENCE-7 1 r'y� ^�a9 133.77 MJ 133.79(P) ', 9• HARP, 94. 5 94. c9q J�:j S� ® MAPLE .. .,:� = -: . , rticNr, rrre/ •♦ran. iTPe FENCING (P) RECORDBDPPLAT _X- �- a [89 f 1 890.0 *895- •' ? '•�.., ° 9 7 I_ f ':I _ -. �- „ -^�._i WOOD RETAINING (MJ MEASURED DISTANCE `� �� 4 r1 95 1/ - - - 0 R! 94. I -MR 47.50 � CPORLY4 5.D - ' "�- AVE¢ACIE W BLOCS Lg7E - •I � > a ' ' - • ' Lai. ': ' Vii; WALL .. PROPOSED FNISFED GRADE SHRUB 00. •�� ELEVATION rL)LTPLE STfj•1 BOX ELt1ER�q 4^ E ix894.7 iS p 1 FT. _.1 v� FRONT SETDALY � - i - TREES C'S i ; CANTILEVER =6q5 �:� X, 94 i ..' -- d , ` i.`i PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR I ` 1 1 y, •`f:;,.':' ®•.. MANHOLE �+•. oa m ,�- 10.00 e ! ♦ _ %•': i y '�• 4` i PIRDROGED TWO-STORY ulDOp FRN•R HOUSE RA_L 9' -l' F4MARW MA.BEME NT : n • m -i: �::. 14';::•�.i' , at 2 -; h Bi rn � - ` 4 L THE DI'tEN910N5 SHOWN ARE TO THE BRICK LED4E. SERVICES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS 894. IFEI AND E-- •12m BROOKVIEW AVE p' �i ,' %a 2. THE SEWER AND WA7ERMAN lITL17Y ENCNEERNG OEPARTTENT. N SHED COLRFOETRLFE 894. ARE 22.00 w W �°• �' / % / - = 3QfY B4�L DERNED FROM MAPS PROVED BY TE CITY OF EDNA ANY AND ALL FEID CONDRIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS SFIOILD BE FELD VERFED .894.7 , . i .94.0 ° 895. �® 'd J5.50 ` ; :�: .. _ PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION. 91 sPRuCE,y�, ` _ . - PROPERTY TO nA' FND P N 'T- FND P , LNTr °' �' •69 3. A7 THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. THE SHED LOCATED ON THE ADJONNG A FOUNOATKM 5 FT. 9DE 9ETBAGX L9 / 0 THE SOUTH DD NOT APPEAR TO HAVE 6Al ` -4Fi. WOOD FENCE 1 p l qa. 1. 0°`A .4 R9((J 33. 78(U- 'sB9a9 . ;srize_Lt�El1__ - _6FT. W000 '-'F "`offff c/, J.. �._ % _,.' •.. /'ti..._ _/ tp � '6 ° - 889.7 4. FOR THE PURPOSES OF 1H19 SURVEY. THE BEARNG9 ARE BASED ON !W A$Sll'ffD ON AN A55UIW DATUM (BENCHMARK - FE. 894.9 N8J =4i 3U 'iP 9 ORIENTATION AND THE ELEVATIRN5 ARE BASED AS SHOWN ON MAP). 3 EX6TNC �KO.6FCRT: - __ i. /~'�, I .. - TOP Nlf HYDRANT LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORER OF WEST 66T 5T¢Ef7 -i1 WOOD FRAM HOUSE SHRUB LPE-' ' :Q AN7 BROALVEW AVENUE. IZ 6128 BROOKVEW AVE. . , FFE =8958 '• I I K'7' °8 ELEV = 884.14 (NGV029) GFim899.0 9.8 5: .� • AREA SUNIMARY 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was • • 800 a Butler$quafe LOT 6, BLOCK 23, FARFAX. CROSS BULPNG AREA 2,049 SO. FT. OR 0.05 AC. prepared by or under dl supervlslon and • • 100 North SbM Sb@et HENAEPN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 50 30- FT. OF THE COVERED PORCH ALLOWED PER CITY COOS) ( Web 1� I15 du that 1 am a duly laws !the State Sur Ilaensed Land Surveyor under La o! Mlnne the L A N D F O R M • • BlfettiBep0ll9, MN $5403 • • NET BUILDING AREA = L999 52 FT. OR 0.05 AC. 3- Qyif'y / v10�"Pi • . Web: landfo(7n.net GARAGE FLOOR = 895.0 LOT 6 AREA = 6,679. 50. FT. OR 0.15 AC. ^ 0� 30 /D =- 2DOa 7 TOP OF BLOCK = 899.. FIRST FLOOR = 896.1 ° NC COVERAGE 29.93% le ' D S Fr: Q JONATHAN M. PRTMANN Dam 08/13/08 JM503005 can.J'L9005_r -8 Btr. .S•1P Job Na Draw": LOWEST FLOOR m 886.25 Lbu=.Na 44647 Reulsd: II 24 08 .•4 0 )/] n I,. I n c r. I AP I s V . 1 , , 1. a!r %),.De„ 7-.rT /7 1 -7 CJ 4 D Ocume')q "D Property ID Houses Name �-Pnfl' 1 Photo(s)w-file Today's date: 01;2M 1 Sketch(es) on file Release: 1.05.02G Logged on userJOWIGKLUND 19-028-24-43-0091 Address: (Assessin c - MitziWicklund (PO, Single PID 1 Parcel Search 2Clear 3Pri.rit ... !I 4•Viev., Photos- Parcel Status: ACTIVE 11 1 1--=,", ........... I I — 71 !:Di Parcel Admini-StIZItiOn A 'ITF WN m Parcel Informafic Azssessor Comments 105ave P'fiear L, z; 0- 1 W current owners PreviOLIS owners 11! P.-Julti Address IZQ Permits Parcel Divisioning Gpdat Temporary PID Li./ Divisions Parcel info eoas vsons RJ Project Update Taxpayer Inquiry I Lot: GG4 Block: 423 Addition: Parcel Info Mass I-Ipd Parcel Mass Upd ate "Values Administration Metes and Bounds: 'N, 'Values Information LOTS 5 AND 6 Hennepin County Trai, Homestead Update Homestead Rollover SS N Future to Cumanl Sales Administration 1. Sales Information [.4"'. Sales Ratios Comparables Infonnat 0 t Property Characteristics Land I. i. Inspections Residential Commercial Industriz multi-Family Field Card Print ;'.000 character maxinium, length. CAMA Special Assessments Division Information Search Parent PID: Divison Process .Date: Master Information Comments Division Number: Year Split: Mass Add Mass Comments Updi Mass Payoff W- raLL1.LVALLUTZIvaabaaow6Lavaawwau anaY. rrwv�n .��utvuar..avuswauYaau.araaaaa aaaao •awa):oau ary���+� it>06 (A elA+ c t �� 'je-. 4) Staffribune.com I MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA Part 1: Minnesota's new ghost towns By CHRIS SERRES, JIM BUCHTA and GLENN HOWATT, Star Tribune staff writers April 21, 2008 For a brief while, as Crystal Colvin handed out lemonade to the sweaty hopsootchers on her front porch, it seemed like a picture- perfect afternoon at the Colvin house in Albertville. But inside, the atmosphere was tense. Jon Colvin, 38, a telephone network technician and father of six children, had just informed CitiFinancial that he would be unable to make his March mortgage payment, and would probably miss Apdrs, too. He hoped the news would finally scare the bank into renegotiating a mortgage he cant afford for a house he can't sell — and now wishes he had never bought. "It's not something I feel proud doing," Colvin said of missing the payments. "But how else am I going to get the bank's attention ?" The reckoning inside the Colvins' four - year -0Id home is playing out at kitchen tables and corporate boardrooms across Minnesota — and the world. For the first time in decades, U.S. home values are plunging, dragging economies around the world down with them. The roots of that financial crisis can be found in places like Wright County, where the combination of affordable land, cheap money and boundless optimism lured builders and families chasing big homes in the kind of brand -new subdivisions they thought were beyond their reach. The county's population swelled nearly 30 percent in the past decade. Home prices seemed to climb with each arrival, making everyone feel rich. But the boom has unraveled as quickly as it began. While many established Wright County neighborhoods have avoided the worst of the housing market collapse, the county ranks as one of the state's worst areas hit by foreclosures. Pockets of this county, about 30 miles northwest of the Twin Cities have seen home prices fag 30 percent or more in the past year. Families such as the Colvin are trapped in homes worth far less than what they paid. Speculators, who helped fuel both the boom and its collapse, are also stuck, their get-rich-quick properties now money pits. Meanwhile, cities and townships such as Buffalo, Otsego,. Albertville and St. Michael, which were in the throes of building schools, roads and expanded water-treatment plants to match their growing population, are left with big bills and the prospect of a dwindling tax base. There are few trees or hills in this flat, predominantly rural county to obscure the evidence: Rows of vacant and unfinished homes, often with lockboxes on the front doors and foreclosure notices taped to the windows. Realtors call them "see- through houses," so 1 of 6 1/21/2009 4:09 PTV. Y8r[ 1: minnesoiws new gnostTowns ULLP.Il w w W .buu u lUUUO.uUDN LCLLipiLLL DIU- a I7Jt -7m Doa1 E"2, empty of furniture and curtains that it's possible to see right through them. "Based on what I see out here, we're headed for the Great Depression," said Dan Frie, a sales agent with Wright Sherburne Realty in Monticello, who has been in the business nearly 30 years. While Frie blames fraud for exacerbating the problem, many of the mortgages that are in default are held by people who believed — as many did and as the real estate community told them — that real estate doesn't lose its value. "And just because the national economy recovers doesn't mean that our local economy will recover, and that's what I'm worried about," Frie said. Creameries to communities Wright County is close enough to the Twin Cities to invite sprawl yet still rural enough that its easy to miss new developments, with evocative names like Sundance Ridge and Rodeo Hills. The county was settled by first- and second - generation German families that operated small dairy farms and delivered their milk to area creameries. After World War II, many of these farmers began working second jobs to make a living. As the highways got closer, they began selling their land off to developers. By the late 1990s, with the Twin Cities suburbs filling fast, Wright County was a bargain for developers. In sleepy rural communities like St. Michael, land could be had for less than $10,000 an acre — just a quarter of prices closer to the Twin Cities. "The land was inexpensive, the community was cooperative and it was just a 10- minute drive past Maple Grove, said Hans Hagen, a Fridley -based home builder and developer, and one of the first to reach into Wright County. His pitch to lure buyers: "Drive 10 minutes and save $10,000." And buyers did. In St. Michael, the largest city in Wright County, almost 1,600 single - family houses, townhouses and condominiums were built between 2002 and 2007. In Otsego, almost 2,200 units were built during the same period. The county's average sale price jumped from $180,102 in 2001 to $234,009 in 2007, an increase of 30 percent. In Albertville, the gains were even sharper. 43 percent. "In 2005, my dog could have sold real estate in Wright County," Frie said. "A lot of people thought this was the next big growth market, and they wanted to be part of it." Buyers said they were lured by easy credit — often from aggressive ban officers who looked past their checkered credit histories and unstable income. Marry of these ban officers worked for the financing arms of local builders, which had a vested interest in getting the houses sold regardless of whether people could afford them, real estate agents said. Subprime mortgages, which charge higher rates to riskier borrowers, proved especially popular. In Wright County, the percentage of homes purchased with subprime mortgages doubled from'l3 percent in 2004 to 26 percent in 2006 — two and a half times the rate in Minnesota as a whole. 2 of 1/21/2009 4:09 PIv Yar[ l: mlffiesom -s new gnost towns fill}1.ii w w w.alaauavuuG.waaa wataYaawaa auas aqua �rwa)+oau a ice. �+� vac. When the bottom fell out of the housing market, many homeowners found themselves in a virtual equivalent of debtors' prison, unable to refinance loans that are now larger than the value of their homes. "A lot of people out here feel trapped," said Dave Petersen, an agent with Keller Williams in Elk River, who has sold numerous houses in Otsego and St Michael. "They were enticed by easy credit to buy houses that were never worth what they thought they were worth." Ghost town subdivisions Newly married in 2005, James and Angela O'Hara, 25, fell in love with a tidy two -story townhouse in St. Michael with a brick fagade, wood floors and stainless steel appriances. The townhouse was to be part of a mixed -use project called "Town Center of St. Michael," which was designed to be a walk -about community with an urban feel. A real estate agent urged the couple to buy early, noting that other buyers would bid up prices by 5 to 10 percent once the rest of the project became reality. The couple were shown idealistic renderings of the project that featured narrow streets and small storefronts mixed in with housing and offices. "They sold the vision as much as the house," James said. "They said it would be this bustling neighborhood with all these attractions just a block away. We never imagined it would lose value." But the vision never materialized. Builders began pulling out of the project two summers ago, after the housing market collapsed. The shops and restaurants have been slow to arrive, though construction of a retail building is expected to begin next month. "Everyone counted on the new residents [in the townhouses] to make it succeed," said Gary DiPilato, a sales agent with Darkenwald Real Estate, which is responsible for commercial land sales and retail leasing on the project. "Retailers need bodies to come in." Instead of riving in a bustling urban village, the O'Haras look out on a field of weeds and townhouses with "Bank Owned" signs posted on their front doors. Several of the townhouses are clad in Tyvek HomeWrap, their brick facades still unfinished. The O'Haras need to move out of their townhouse by next summer, when James, a staff sergeant in the Marine Corps, reports for officer's training in Virginia. But the couple fear they won't be able to sell the unit for enough to repay the $190,000 mortgage. "It's become a huge albatross around our neck," James said, as he walked their dog, Oscar, through knee -high weeds in a field behind their house. There are several ghost town subdivisions like the Town Center of St. Michel across Wright County. The county is on pace to have a record 1,080 foreclosures this year, up 43 percent from a year earlier. That total is more than all the new houses built in fast - growing Albertville during the past six years. 3 of 6 1/21/2009 4:09 Ply rarL 1: IYUMGJUM J uG W 61.1v,1 W W M tau.Y.r i w n r .�� u ivuan..waar wauYiawoi a a aan a uao vwa) : uau a : �.+i-• DOC, In Otsego there are 138 vacant houses. The vast majority are located in subdivisions built within the past five years. "The newer the project, the harder it fell," said Bruce McAlpin, an agent with Edina Realty in Monticello. In Otsego Preserve, a new housing project just a mile north of Interstate 94 in Otsego, more than half of 128 houses are vacant, according to city officials. Some houses in the subdivision have been empty or unfinished for more than a year. Garage doors are missing, unopened mail clogs mailboxes, and dormant lawns have turned into tangled masses of weeds. Some homes are priced for $80,000 to $100,000 less than their original price. "A lot of the prices that people were paying for property in Wright County had no basis in reality," said George Schmidt, a real estate agent with Remax in Anoka. 'They were destined for foreclosure." The good life gone awry Not far from Otsego Preserve, a real estate developer and two investors spent $1.5 million preparing 350 acres of farmland for an ambitious new "master- planned community" called Martin Farms which was to include up to 400 homes priced between $350,000 and $550,000. They installed a swimming pool, clubhouse, several gazebos, soccer fields and walking trails. A large sign irivites passersby to "Step Up to the Good Life." But 18 months ago, after the initial houses didn't sell, the national builders who bought many of the lots in Martin Farms pulled out. Though all the amenities are still there, few people are living in the subdivision to enjoy them. The 30 houses that were built are now on the market for as low as $200,000 — about half the original asking price. Jeffrey Schoenwetter,_chief executive of JMS Homes in Eden Prairie and one of the investors in Martin Farms, said 400 houses didn't seem excessive when the project was hatched in 2004. The project kept growing in size, he said, based on demands from builders. "When you have 10 builders come to you and say, we want to buy 10 lots a year, and then Mr. Builder says, 'I have five friends that want to come, too, could we have 100 lots ?' Then I said, 'OK, I'll develop 100 lots. "' Added Schoenwetter. "Builders were part of the problem. They kept moving forward when the wheels on the machine were wobbling and the tires were about to blow." As recently as last year, after the housing market had already shown signs of weakness, developers were throwing six-figure parties to market their projects. In the spring of 2005, more than 150 real estate agents showed up for a party to showcase new upscale homes at the Riverwood National Golf Course in Otsego. So many agents wanted to list the new houses, which were priced at up to $800,000, that a line of parked cars stretched a half-mile through the golf course. Today, about one -third of the 74 houses and townhomes in Riverwood National are vacant or in foreclosure. Empty lots bought for $139,000 or more sit vacant next to golf greens. 1/21/2009 4:09 PIS 4 of 6 rarr 1: Nnnnesoras new gnost towns uLy.11 WWW. bLa .lulVuuo.WLLFI=lillliaL4AIaauu auau_Lrwa).laau --- t)vc . F- -5' Laurie Karnes, a real estate broker who specializes in selling undeveloped land in the Twin Cities, blames today's problems on greed and a failure to acknowledge that the good times wouldn't last forever. "Logic would have told you, why would you build there?" Kames said of some of the county's overdeveloped communities. "But logic wasn't fueling this craziness." No one to bid In a sign of just how depressed the housing market is in Wright County, almost no one shows up for the sheriffs auction of foreclosed homes held each morning in a tiny room with faded carpets in the Wright County courthouse in downtown Buffalo. The home's owners and the occasional investor used to crowd into the room to bid on their property. But these days, the only bidders are representatives of lenders that own the mortgages. The auctions typically last no more than a few minutes. In the past four months, 86 percent of the homes sold in Wright County were bank -owned and 7 percent were "short sales," or deals that were negotiated by homeowners who owed more than the house was worth, according to calculations by Frie. And those cut -rate deals are undercutting values of homes throughout the county. "The values we're putting on houses is equal to what they were five years ago," he said. "And [homeowners] can't compete with lenders who are discounting them." Wanting out The Colvin have considered selling their house to avoid a foreclosure. But based on recent sales in their neighborhood, the couple estimates that the most a buyer would pay for their house is $250,000, not enough to pay off the couple's $330,000 mortgage after two refinancings. The Colvins say they were lured to buy their home, in a newer subdivision in Albertville called Heuring Meadows, by a mortgage broker with First Priority Mortgage in St. Michael. The broker, Paul Reese, said they could get around Jon's poor credit record with a higher - interest loan, which they could refinance after six months. By then, the property would be worth even more, so they could even take some equity out of the home and pay off some bills. But the bank wouldn't refinance, and with some missed payments, the couple's interest rate stands at 10.5 percent. Reese said the refinancing plan he worked out with the Colvins might have worked had the couple stuck to his instructions. Unfortunately, in this market, it seems like people are looking to blame whomever they can for their own mistakes," said Reese, who has since closed his mortgage company. The couple have spent the past six months trying to negotiate a new mortgage with their lender, CitiFinancial, but the bank said it is focusing on borrowers with more serious problems. Jon, who's working a second full -time job at night and on weekends, decided to stop making the payments and put the money in a savings account. "It's a sad state of affairs when you have to miss a payment to get the bank to return your 1/21/2009 4:09 Pr 5 of 6 Ya ( 1: 1V11IlIIPiSOTd'S RCW gWSL WWLD utaF.11 telephone calls," he said. Hilary Bnjeck, a University of Minnesota student reporter on assignment for the Star Tribune, contributed to this story. cserres(cD-startribune.com • 612 -673 -4308 Luchta(cDstartribune.com • 612 -673 -7376 howatt M- startribune.com • 612 -673 -7192 O 2009 Star Tribune. All rights reserved. 6 of 6 1/21/2009 4:09 P1V. Twul1J raigu umcb VVV1 F1VJG:i13 1111J1DGSV, A-allOV11M, 1WrJ W 01-11 - ... LILLJ1.1I r r r. V1LiVLIlL41J .VV11➢1Vt111M1LLVJ /JWl1VJ /LVVV/ VV! V /I,LUlI� ay.u... Members: Log In I Not R Wrineapolis / St. Paul Businew Journal - June 10, 2008 htta• //tMncftles.btejournals .corrdtwincitkWstorL— .J2008/061091daIW 8.Mm1 Bus NiNN� )ouRNAL PAUL Tuesday, June 10, 2008 QDocun�en� � Wells Fargo takes over projects in Otsego, Lakeville; looks to sell Mimeapolis / St. Pad Business Joumal Wells Fargo & Co. has retained CB Richard Ellis to sell bank -owned residential lots and land in Otsego and Lakeville. The Otsego land, called the Martin Farms development, has i5o vacant developed lots and 1o8 acres of residential land. It's priced at $10.2 m ion but is divisible. The Lakeville property, called Tullmore, has about 81 residential -zoned acres with about 149 single - family plots. That property is marketed at $5.75 million. Eden Prairie -based Insignia Development was the developer for both projects, according to the company's Web site and city records. Insignia didn't own either property, said Jeff Schoenwetter, CEO of JMS Cos., which owns Insignia. Some of Insignia's principals were investors in Tullamore, he said, while Martin Farms was partly owned by a former Insignia principal. San Francisco -based Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFQ took possession of both properties during a workout process in the past few months, Schoenwetter said. With residential sales down, it made sense to let the bank'take over, he said. But Schoenwetter said the properties are still valuable. "Someone will do well with both projects," he said. CB Richard Ellis Land Group will work to sell the land, led by Richard Palmiter and Brian Pankratz. All contents of this site © American City Business Journals Inc. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 1/21/2009 4:41 PA 13HnKsuirlsLurM1UJn1GU11ll1VG1ruwI1FAUPUILy111L 'UVurlOuIV- lvll... LLtf l. rIVYWW. vl/ �VLLLaIaaJ. WaaLLWaaayaua. ar ,Waa�or�vvurv-rrvrrowa�aa.aa... Members: Log In I Not R Minneapolis I St. Paul Business Journal - April 7, 2008 http• / /tvAncities biziournals. comftvAncitbsistorkW2008104 /07 /storyll.Mmi Bus IIIIMM )ouRNAL PAUL Dvaumenfi G- Friday, April 4, 2008 Bank starts foreclosure on River Knoll property in Eden Prairie Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Joumal - by Sam Black Staff Writer Anchor Bancorp. Inc. has begun the foreclosure process on a 25,000- square -foot building owned by Jeff Schoenwetter, principal of JMS Cos. of Eden Prairie, according to Hennepin County notices. The property being foreclosed on is a 5- year -old office building called River Knoll Business Center, at 6889 Rowland Road. It is JMS's headquarters; half of the building is vacant In February, Anchor Bank notified an entity controlled by Schoenwetter that it was in default on its $3.96 million mortgage. A sheriffs sale is scheduled for May 9. Schoenwetter will have until November to redeem the mortgage and avoid foreclosure. Hennepin County values the property at $3.93 million. Schoenwetter said the foreclosure is part of a "significant workout" he's in the midst of due to the slumping housing market It isn't associated with any underlying weakness in the commercial real estate sector, he said. "I have a handful of residential real estate that's crossed the pulpit with some of our commercial stuff," he said. Schoenwetter hopes to find "a solution" before the foreclosure becomes final. "The fortunate thing is we're large enough and old enough and diverse enough that we'll work through all these issues," he said. Pete Stein, an attorney at St. Paul -based Stein & Moore, which represents Anchor Bank, declined to comment. Schoenwetter, former president of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities and the Builders Association of Minnesota, owns several affiliated real estate companies, including a construction financing arm. Through various partnerships, he owns about a half - million square feet of industrial and office space in the southwest metro. He said he didn't expect the foreclosure notice of River Knoll would affect those properties. sb1ack @bi4burnals.com 1 (612) 288 -2103 All contents of this site @ American City Business Joumals Inc. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 1/21/2009 4:47 PT D,Ua1LIK:10a l%JLI%a JLLqvujjm I - vm.:Vv A-u'l III I 11LIJ.1 I L&6.0Va.0&aLr,.LLUI.UW Luuarwatncu %,UIF—LL14ULI hin� Q. 1, IX Online :access DA Home UCC Business Services Account Session Briefcase Help1FAQs About BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS INQUIRY - VIEW ENTITY Filing Number: 2844837-2 Entity Type: Original Date of Filing 5/7/2008 Entity Status: Entity Date to Expire: Chapter: Good Standing: (date of last annual filing) Name: Registered Office Address: Home State: Agent Name: 6889 Rowland Road, LLC 730 2nd Ave S # 1300 Mpls, NW, 55402 MN No Agent Filed Additional Entity Detail Return b Search List New Search Limited Liability Company Active 322B Prior +0 S)A Sal e-., DA Home I OSS Home I Contacts I Privacy Policy I Terms & Conditions Use of this site and services indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use. @Copyri-ght 2001 , Minnesota Office of the Secretary of State. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 1 1/21/2009 4:50 Pb nusumJJ U7lUKfUF1U%aGJ 11Ll�/. // W Y� t�•J14141VYL14.W1W {iLla�l16WJ /a lliJa au►J uwa� +oau ., ✓«.i i�.� UdGlil,YVb�Y1�' � . StarTribune.com I MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA Business bankruptcies November 30, 2008 This is a list of recent business - related bankruptcies filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Minneapolis and St Paul. The number following the filing date is the case number. A Chapter 7 petition is for liquidation of the businesses; Chapter 11 (or Chapter 12 for farmers or Chapter 13 for small businesses) gives protection from creditors while the business is reorganized. The individuals or organizations listed in bold are the ones filing for bankruptcy. MINNEAPOLIS Plug- N-Play Properties, doing business as Exterior Aesthetics, 1495154th Lane NW., Andover; filed Nov. 12, 08145892; Chap. 7; assets, $49,166; liabilities, $192,263. Scott Hegquist, manager. Molly P. O'Boyle, doing business as Mugs Gardining, 3953 36th Av. S., Minneapolis; filed Nov. 12, 08145903; Chap. 7; assets, $162,070; liabilities, $286,799. Katherine Ann Grinnell, doing business as United Real Estate Associates Inc., Sartell, Minn.; filed Nov. 13, 08 -45925; Chap. 7; assets, $543,077; liabilities, $581,021. Amy Marie Ralber and Patrick Jay Ralber 11, doing business as Max Investments, Litchfield, Minn.; filed Nov. 13, 08145928; Chap. 7; assets, $156,931; liabilities, $215,612. Roberta Jeanne Cain, formerly doing business as Young's Flowers On Nicollet and Young's Floral, 4228 Elliott Av. S., Minneapolis; filed Nov. 14, 08- 45933; Chap. 7; assets, $6,690; liabilities, $66,561. Tony Edward LaDuke and Jennifer Dawn LaDuke, doing business as Action Electrical Services, Sartell, Minn.; filed Nov. 14, 08115940; Chap. 7; assets, $69,029; liabilities, $100,995. Robert Lee Bannister, as surety for Bannister Custom Crafted Masonry Inc., and Renee Cheryl Bannister, 14971 Bluebird St. NW., Andover, filed Nov. 14, 08- 45944; Chap. 7; assets, $360,229; liabilities, $517,961. Sheldon Lynn Carlson, doing business as Creative Names & More, St. Cloud, Minn.; filed Nov. 17, 08- 45973; Chap. 7; assets, $187,605; liabilities, $219,070. Savage Development I, 5250 W. 74th St., Edina; filed Nov. 17, 08- 45985; Chap. 11; no schedules filed. Jeffrey M. Schoerwetter, chief manager. Savage Development II, 5250 W. 74th St., Edina; filed Nov. 17, 08- 45986; Chap. 11; no schedules filed. Jeffrey M. Schoenwetter, chief manager. John M. Bailey and Monique A. Liberty - Bailey, as surety for At the Beach Tanning Inc. and Liberty Bailey, 2824 Rice Creek Pkwy., .Blaine; filed Nov. 17, 08115993; Chap. 7; assets, $345,479; liabilities, $479,633. 1 of 3 1/21/2009 4:06 Pr To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: February 3, 2009 Subject: Set Hearing Date for a Conditional Use Permit to build a maintenance building at 5701 Normandale Road. Deadline for a city decision: March 17, 2009 Recommended Action: Set the hearing date for February 17, 2009. Information/B ackground: See attached Planning Commission report. KEFUK'1 /KECUMMLN UA 1 lUN Agenda Item V.D.2. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends 1-1 To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion o e e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 28, 2008 2008- 009.08a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description The Edina Public Schools are proposing to build a 1,984 square foot maintenance and storage building on the west side of the high school football field, near the entrance gate. (See location on page Al —A2.) Based on the comments of the Planning Commission, the shed has been relocated from the originally requested location, .which was adjacent to the exisitng tennis courts on Concord Avenue. (See previous location on page A3.) The School District had considered locating the building off site, at Creek Valley Park, however, decided that it would not be an efficient location. Equipment would have to be hauled greater distances, at greater expense to the School District, than from the proposed site. The request requires a conditional use permit. (See the proposed plans on pages A4 —A10. ) Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Edina Community Center Easterly: The Edina football & soccer field and track Southerly: Single- family homes & Concord Elementary School: zoned and guided low- density residential Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The existing 28 acres contain the South View Middle School; the Edina Community Center; athletic facilities for Edina Schools including tennis courts, baseball and softball field a football /soccer field with a track; and three large parking fields. (See page A2.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Building Design /Landscaping Public /Semi - public R -1, Single- dwelling district As shown on the attached building elevations, the building would be a green metal building with a tan metal roof and doors. The building colors would be similar to existing storage sheds located on this site. (See pages A1 Oa— Al 0d.) (See photo simulation of what the building would look like on the site on page A10e.) The applicant is proposing to plant two Norway Spruce and eleven Rushmore Arborvitae to provide year round screening of the shed from residents to the south. (See page A6 and A1 0e.) Grading & Drainage The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and finds them acceptable. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, the City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare; The new accessory building would not be detrimental to the site. The use on the site would remain the same. The building simply provides indoor storage and repair area for school equipment. 2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages; There would be no increase in traffic or need-for additional parking. 3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance; The new building would not be injurious to the use of the site, would not decrease property values in the vicinity or cause a nuisance as defined in OA Edina's nuisance ordinance. The new building would be green to match existing storage sheds in the area, so as to blend into the site better than the previously proposed building. (See page A4.) With the exception of color, the proposed building is similar to others located at the following Edina Public Schools: Countryside; Highlands; Cornelia; and Creek Valley. (See pages All —Al 6.) The applicant is also proposing to plant two Norway Spruce and eleven Rushmore Arborvitae to provide year round screening of the shed from residents to the south. (See page A6 and A1 0e.) 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The building would not impede development of property in the area. 5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities; The building would not generate any traffic or increase usage of school facilities, therefore, would not create a burden on parks, street or other public facilities. 6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and The proposal meets all other Zoning Ordinance requirements. 7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Accessory buildings are conditionally permitted within the R -1 zoning district; therefore, the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3 Compliance Table PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue o Is the proposed new building reasonable for this site? Yes.. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 2 -3 of this report the seven findings for a conditional use permit would be met: 2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. All setback requirements would be met. (See page 3 of this report.) 3. The proposed building would be the colors as existing accessory buildings on site, and similar to others located at the following Edina Public Schools: Countryside; Highlands; Cornelia; and Creek Valley. 4. The structure would be partially screened by two Spruce trees and eleven Arborvitaes. 4 City .Standard Proposed Front — Normandale Road 50-feet 200+ feet Side Steet — Southview Lane 50 feet 500+ fee Rear — Concord Ave. 50 feet 800+ feet Side — South 50' feet 125 feet to City water tower site; & 425 feet to nearest residential property Building Height 30 feet 18 feet (20' 8" to the ridge line) Over -story Trees 128 trees required 242 trees existing on the site (number is based on the perimeter of the site) PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue o Is the proposed new building reasonable for this site? Yes.. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 2 -3 of this report the seven findings for a conditional use permit would be met: 2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. All setback requirements would be met. (See page 3 of this report.) 3. The proposed building would be the colors as existing accessory buildings on site, and similar to others located at the following Edina Public Schools: Countryside; Highlands; Cornelia; and Creek Valley. 4. The structure would be partially screened by two Spruce trees and eleven Arborvitaes. 4 Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build a metal accessory building at 5701 Normandale Road for Edina Public Schools. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans and the conditions below: Site plan date stamped December 23, 2008. ® Grading plan date stamped December 23, 2008. ® Landscaping plan date stamped December 23, 2008. ® Building elevations date stamped December 23, 2008. 2. Record the approving resolution with the county. 3. The building must meet all applicable building permit requirements. Deadline for a city decision: March 17, 2009 5 City of Edina szae saw sloe 5704 sap, 5010 51112 54474 STU 5376- Ley�fud 5257` ,5408. Sift 1 { 5028 5076 " -- 17ighlipMatl Featurt /> 31472/ /I 15700 5044 4808 480['41102 4M 5710/4709 4706 1702 4700 1610 4606 4606 4602 4600,4508 450E 5501 4500 5401 5600- _ p 15112 5116 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 5204 r5 20f 5037 50175005 LL (- �,t,« pJ 5409 Hausa N-b., Labolc 51.505 ,( 51700/ 30771501113 j48/47 775 1707 47014617 74 6613 0609 4605 4601 55111509 gm9 5134 J -15105 �� 5(05'�50J1 650 f7 ((487811 � � I I 114611 d607�� 57135077 Street Name LSb.i. 1 150 � N I 1 5028 5016 B L-! 4704 <7a1�1�1< 1812 I60D 14406 1602 14600 145014 1506 4501 QSCD 31 _3�,2Q -J City Limits 5117-5}�r� --5100 2!-' ! I I I f I r 52014 I 5112310.7 7� 14--- 14907 �.d7>� ��� d5f0 �J `15704 g708 5w1507]SG7750/)5005 y ,�R 5293 Croaks 5045 5029 I SOOB C— (BOS - L- ` 550f'<g/ 1 1607 1460] 3601 4509 450. 4503 4501 5056.- 4902 `` - 576 517]5705 j;7-,—. Sw85014[503750205012 ^ I6 5502 SSB3- -1609 I 1 4511 I I I I 53� O Lake Names Sm7 3107 5036 5028 5074 5076 5004 214 ` 5500 4512 4608 4604 4600 4515 4510 4504 4500 SSOf,55'08 1}J 5105 - - - -- 901 1.._ 5320 I- I 510f� 21 Q906 /� 9503.350 35071 L_L(160t �jJ+3064502Lb1W55509 C Lk.. 3216 5204 5517 65 13520 5517 50411 5077 5025 5013 5009 4909 7 u .� I 1 1 1 -I I - I 1 1 1 I s 3507 55125613 46114607 4517 4513 450 -° 0505 45 Parks 5272 33?2 5525 Slot W - f 9036 5072 W20 5077 SOw I/9f 0 414140 55� ( 4601 x!•+'07 d507 -5573 SSf 7 5108-5524��50401502t_Sp/E 5008 �I 4E12(81C4e0e�1�� 5576 Ier.w O Par0615 y 148775 /55N 55251(629 �}7 S50 5529 R 55215525 752- 5100 3105 5607 5041 5037 5025 501) SOrS50p3 602 I 5601 �.2 1 I I I I I 1 1 Ira77 5606 3 ` 5529 5537 5057 301003 5602 F+b07 b377 16 4600 555' 4536 4528 4576 503E 5028 5024 5016 S00! 24 6014 4J -I %5711525' 1 13377 3572 5 %_2•' So49 \so3z150m3orz_5004JJ 605 5644 607 560208 5606 ? 5606 15607 3 56051:604 1607 56014 s677 x619 dfi2/ 4609 45351515 4507 5604 Moir ro 1e • X045 1115027 3071 SDD➢ 5005 I ' E 5606 f 608 15609 5608 5607 5606 15609 5610 5� 15605 - 2a Sw1 5015�5D1J.JTLr , 15 4162 4600 (6M 4536 14518 /Sm 5613 560E 3617156014 , ,:: j - 5077 1 15012 Sp0! 5610 61715610 15609 5608 561/ 5672 620 56275612 \58801' `ti, 50163016500824 I 1 I I I I I I 3532 152555/6 5657 �� 5672 6775612 I56i13B/0 I'+6T7 �56f< sr 1 5933 8 11 5713 5717 5721: 1 1 I 581 4620 5609 460.5619 8525 4517 11x50 i7015G/6 t SOm 50255009 g Sbld 615561/ 561715672 156f55616� 5615/611 Ifi05 4529:521 36415 7� 5705 56m�i y 15616 36773616 13613 5671 5617 56 }8 II I„_7 O S7i3�5624571I` 4723 T�5014 5019 5679_462116114 [6147 D6p0 45m <StE45}2 5655 6 5621"5174 7 Slop ��502d '5033 D X. 5631 3 3619 $625 �J �5p72 V 946251617116- 09 57013505 57001 < 5 . t .1 LI \ 5728 4624 [620 461214604 (/�� `npy �BB fa 1s 5204 5724 31143110 S m 1616" 246047 oaf *2, 28_5700 IStm ��, Q 777 :5711 5716 5.1757f2 !� _3805 14677 4601 577 75im 5717,5716 1114 1416 ID'95m5 5121311731095,01 5�1 , $01 617 1C I I I I I I I 5ok-\ 7 71, 5721 57Z4 57215720 Sol 162016124604 442144516 t4'3Nr in 5725 S71d 5725 5751 s1ms1Talw sop 54470 i � g m Ism_L_L ssoe sna_spa l l hst7Y ssr7 _ _ ?( 0 01-1 sapr —, SBOT sago seer 50470 56013 71 51213117 /479 31109 54/6 5821 �� n 5805 T�5D05�SdOd SdDS ~51405 3809 3816 1 s s5icf� 58'21 T f ST 2 3104 5108 3677 X20 5655 - 13 581 7 nsa16 s11� 041 Sd16 51413 5n 5204 3204 5116. >1w 1 1 15025 \ 5829. 5Bm 1T� 321 v' �30t4\ 5825- 5dj}�s�5sz1 �21 5dz1 $dzs 1- 3201 57775108 /� 15ens01z a 5837 -sazs � 58 7 �8i2I R77 Ii 3111 ,58275828"11 Z9 5829' 5x29 Sd29 L1500a c -� -5633 -`+876 5} SW t- 58x1 5112310/24 ,SBzS�- 9 woo SE71SDd}1 f -51437 5E37 _51437 - 5 if it ITM w 5629 Si 77 5900 4 9013 > ` LsBK 5047 555"5�C5 gBTj4 645 5840 5843 ' 5972 5 a° 3901 5904 5905 390/ 59015900 5901T900� 1 w 590Tty 59075900 3125 6121 1 5900 5906 5969 :::iii 48134 111 ---- 511905 5909 5909 5908 SgpS x5905 5909-5905 5909 3816 590 4810 I�� t-1 T Yaw 414001 5913 5917 -5919 5917_ 5913 591 -5813 SHTI -5913 5917 52478 32471 5120 5104 5100 5064 3020 5911 3913 SOOT 1 1 4732 �-1 5920 1 57211 I $tw I I 1 5010 50 7 6663 L I I !Y806_J -LJ L!� --5921 5925 -59'2 5929 5975 -59 '5925-59215925 QDOt 6004 60016000 fiw1 fi000 6001 5073 5009 5005 I/L76 S8T] 141403 AJ7 4717 [7091705 5_52929 5973 583,7 25 I 1-59 _5929 $933 -5g25 5977 6005 6004 6005 6000 �I i [+ 5013 I 1 u - - -N 5947 -59 x5937_1 /1 1900 71 /6T11dOd 41400 R2S n/6 6708 5977 -59447 5937 5� 6009 6008 6008 60014 6008 6008 6303 50m 5016 281820 I I I 147m 17tL47w�� Sw5 5945 �Jfi0T260}5 6072 6017 6072 .5025Imo/ sacs Sw5285945 L' 04 5904 -5045 0 60116016 POI-7,601 6 601.761000 � -- ��gpp�< T�254a1T4B:7 4801' U17� 70 7 6DOi6000 600160001 6001600D boot 6000 6001 �3 5000 (E19 6004 1 1.1709 I 6005 6004 6005 6005 600E 6005 6004 60014 60 ,6T' Sop / U (809 447 1Q0w1 6004' 6009 -I i .6700 67016708 61016100 6108��S0t21 4830 1620 1^-6008 054 564703 6009,6008600860081 60DS,EOOB 60096000 60176016 1 611085016`/ 41404 IL6D0960G51 6045 �60T7� 60171 1 6013605154777`4 3m!'Smp 6105 6104 6103 61st; 5715 5020y ppt 460! lam- 36012 6009 6011 fi0fi 6072 I 6021 BO25 sin 8108 stop 6176 5024 Y 4800 4710 - 60771 60171 '601716016 50, 7`1 6113 6}72 617]6126 130214/ P 4773 �74d28 47m 4776 ��5 6076 2}60161 602760164 6017 --L- 602960 6711.7 4700 j2 �08m ISOm 1 ` > 6021 r13 mi 61 T) 611 /6 6117 � \/ 3025 100 0 41431 (d2S IB09 4801 14708• 1626^ y 6025 6025 6014 \6023 6031 6041 6121 -J {-p� /> 6704 j 727 ��V1 162pj n- �60Y / `16 61256}1 5073 6/w f00 3717 4709 1624.181 64� 0457R 6112 6104 71/36}12 60961w17f2� L 1s679 6Sfi0eB01d 60331516 151224 2sfi105 J�,3f7Bg1W 61 0 /670/ 6776 61f7.� � 1704 61016 SiN4 8117 6/05 677] '4708 61055104 6100 .c AeYaCgys KtlO]60a7aa 3 }21_i�) / fm e1276116� 611716tt27,0L10` 1-_ iL12067z0 c _ PID: 1902924230001 5701 Normandale Rd , Ed'sna, MN 55424 d Y��tu�46z �F� ..dam % 5677 ," Z if W •�,� ! � j Y ^/ ► f ._.. .` ;;, 4679 :: r• rT, ! /1lfKlw(r ! �I 1 `5105 si t, i f i♦ �_ A Ti Zr 5721 4 ,� .•;gam *; � 5eof c �� • b � r'� .� � 5409 ;' � � •r.' ! � rf 1�' '!� `*� \`,t , ;,'t ° 5825 4 5833 t 5837 6FM0144VE ` 7 ^/fr" � �. ♦ 5841 01 1 ST 5 ; ► I k 5901 . 5901 •�* 5905 r`�4 4817 4809 4E05 4801 � 5909 n' x .I - 5705 � SESO 5913 r r ! 5917 .r � rucis aa�s aAl2 x808 4801_ 4800 4137 +A _ J City of Edina 7F'3 56 i R_ EIS p 1 t* 56tS 5017 6811 1 "• � IN IMF 5677 0 _j 50111 !00 r st ,E 't e'• � t¢ � � 9�# �a PJS 580 V yFFi f' R •.ro a �- 5811 587 5875 587 5879 587 + 5737 Sd' ' 5905 OPT" ST Pik t t � I8f0 sue; tl�� PID:1902824230001 5701 Normandale Rd Edina, MN 55424 A3 Fe CID ,sue 0 ,T5, Legend House Number Labels Street Name Labels City Limits Creeks Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels 2000 Aerial PhaW Nc\j100S SIT E I N WEST EAST 49' -6* BUILDING ELEVATIONS Pon o M RrUl SOUTH NORTH 40' -0' n v W O to O 1 Q o u] -11111 Z ui �I F e.8 A d ji (�nn � 4 pm ry 1 9 � WEST SOUTH 111111111NIIm 111111111 1 ► 1 � EAST NORTH BUILDING ELEVATIONS ` AREA OF , LOCATION PLAN WORK sovrn vtEw mmeu scHooL PERKINS +WILL .-Ap IP EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS mEIAL IBM �AG(AR 001RN K1I 1mt lO100. 6C/ ICHMbN2 I 0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN & FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS 1-.d- i6 ,,..r. BUILDING FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS SITE PLAN �1-V7V-GGI. 8 nnr� I rr Ir r ��'nyyynyyyn��� V a �. \\ ` \• \. \',\` ', NOTES 7. ALL APPLICABLE DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR, EDGE ,\, OF PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALIGN CURB \\ \ '\ t \., 1 \ `. 2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME WITH EXISTING '� , ALIGN DRIVE \ \ \`� • -c5�,, \ �\� �\ \ \ BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT. WITH EDGE \1 `� \ �\ \�\' \\ \�`\ 6',CURS TAPER ✓ '. OFSTOOP \ _ \ \l 7. ENGINEERI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INS PECT AND . - APPROVE FINISH GRADING BEFORE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS ✓ , \� ; .I \ l'{ Yf �\ \ \` WITH SODDING. RESTRIPE STALLS ,�,.. ' • °.OD. g. + /.• „A „ \;. \ \ \ ✓ AS REQUIRED o \ .r - i.� \\�\ \ \ \.,� 4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE LIMBS OF CONSTRUCTION _ 1 \ \ \, \ \• SHALL BE SODDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. `SOD,` _ '.••\\ ` \�+'� -q \`\ \ \ \��'�1 5. BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SODDING, V, �\ �; e \ �\ \, ,\ ` REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR PROCEDURE, r •�� "� \\ ' 6. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL j. 7 P •� /i ` \\\ \ �` INFORMATION. �, �.L• ._ ' @-'. y��pd �Ipy spy O� \ i\ \ Y}, y_. \ SOC• 'C UREI TAPER ALIGN CURB - \IIII//TT�� ' •tin 1 '� \� WITH EXISTING • 'Gp�, ,6�!. m ` \� ,/ '�' * sor. �` C ` LEGEND `/ ye / \RIIF�Of SOD- PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 2 -PA ---------------- --- - - - - -- 7•TO / PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK/SLAB - -- 4 -TO i 4 -TO I / PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE I11I1111 _________ • PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SHRUB APPROXIMATE LIMITS / / \ , 't - Om OF SODDING j 7 r - - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - -- \7 �\ �" APPROXIMATE SODDED AREA PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL COMMON NAIVE SCIENTIFIC NAME OTY. SIZE ROOT CONIFEROUS TREES PA INORWAY SPRUCE I Picea abies 2 6' B &B CONIFEROUS SHRUBS TO RUSHMORE ARBORVITAE jThUja occidentalis'RUshmae ii #7 cont. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CL JHEDGE COTOHEASTER Icotoneaster lucidus 1 R #5 coot. 0 15 30 Z J a W F. N !1 T V q5i C� Hu ii s 3 >, N J Z J Q p IL i i A 0 m 0 r- 0 r D Z 40' -0' r - ---------7--------------- - WILL � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �iv I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------- - - - - -- - �- - - -- - - - -�-J PERKINS - WILL ®pi \ / m �iv Z °m rl• nn� _ LZZ 2 N = y PERKINS - WILL ®pi \ / A-7 a.-P o —..m.® I `C6nMUwW Use PermN App. A -050-SV W D DVLS! EDGE OF _ \ - CONCRETE RETE TO 70 REMAIN CENTER 10' -V WIDE BY 1Y -0' HIGH OVERHEAD - \ DDDR OPENING ON NEW ' - \10' -0' WIDE CONCRETE DRIVE -- --•\ •r33 IN -,r\ NEW CURB CUT IN EXISTING '•\� CURB DOSTING CHAIN.', - LINK FENCE 701, -% REMAIN 161i CONC. - \- \r� KEEP SANE NIGNNENT AS \•, `� \\ \\ r `� - - DOSTITNG METAL 1AR DINGS TO THE "°R`" \ NEW WAINT -EK5M VERIFY LOCATION OF EKSW \ \ •,\ PAVING TO N TELEPHONE UTUTY AND \ BLDG \ \ RELOCATE B REDUItED \ DA941NE INDICATESS ROOF D0511NG DbCUS •. NEW LANDSCAPING -SEE � —PADS TO REW NANDSCAPIVG RAN -' — 7 — r / NORTH (1 20'-0, show brommoom SITE PLAN P E R K I NS ll Dm W I L L NOW •s B D+B Ni rs onn A- 050 -ECC °`"° o ®...... •. IJWo Pemit App. — — — — — — — — — — I I I 1. r \\' 7'j ,:too rra 'ID c. P E R O K N S + W LL : On ip m m z NG dD GRADONG PLAN C12 I m NG dD GRADONG PLAN C12 I yr r r \I \ \\ \ 1'. � F Pk f 19C•i� y \ A fit[ eEE� tR R��ga A ( o ��� � W Ct�� t• -� . � R R � - - - - ' _ .�i SIN, a� r• -_�r ^ - � - sue+_ •' �`.+�a _ y -, � - � �- _ - ._.~C •mow �-- I-- j - j I � ,. - - - - • - - - y���,�� - ��++.. y _G. - - _ , ,�t y- • "..�`_ "�".Y �_ , - - sc �- ,;,,"fir. _ n. n q� .•t � . � !,. � r - ,a, � 4 is - a"��•+� � -ire �J Ar I Tor, lima L �IkC o� rV ECEOWI� � V �i O N Q Q i 6-F z C!' 11.1 r- 0 r j vz� ..... ...... MW- t , I .... J, t.. ••' M�A.t •,si'yR.,r,.f'. +t.r i fl�'f+'ryi<�7n - -' j dl „_/ {r.j ,14,�F ,T'` A�` -•a's. tk 1'w ..r. '�' A. S Rlk, ywgn, r��f' �st'N F•i;b -(+.1� 1� � _ r .. id t y /=, ,;y;� , ' '.,�•�'v�'.P'�' � � rr Cf >�j�( :iY� �, ':�',y }��Y��A�+! r W-AMN- +4r 1 46 W-AMN- Bit ,�',' ' � �'" 1�� t v! �'° � �-.•� rte' "�i�'�•� Lr "; �7f ' i �� Ire � *�� � � � /�• J �''Jw � � !fi�� " " � tiv� �•',�i�' � ►YI�y`yt���,�� � ��:1',,��• :, � i � , �• / I " � i`/ r e t w' Bit m 7 DO NOT ENTER 9 00 - 9.20 AM 140 - 4,00 PM "No Jackie Hoogenakker From: pjlarsonl @comcast.net ,nt: Saturday, January 17, 2009 12:28 PM 10: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Maintenance and Storage Building Good Morning, I am writing regard the "pole barn" that you are planning on building near Kuhlman Field. I believe that this location is not appropriate for several reasons. First and foremost it will bring additional traffic to the parking lot. This parking lot is extremely busy as it is and adding your "maintenance shed" will just increase the volume of traffic. This is a school parking lot not only used by the parents of Normandale but also the Family Center where parents are walking their small children, to and from school. You have elementary and middle school students walking to and from school through that area and the increased traffic and the city vehicles coming and going will ultimately affect their safety. This should be your number one reason for finding a better location. The fact that when I'm out in our front yard or looking out my window the only thing that I'll see is a 2000 square foot shed!! This building is as big as my house. This would not be something that I, nor my neighbors, would find aesthetically pleasing to the eye!! It will definitely decrease the value of my home, affect re -sale and re -sale value. If I wanted a pole barn in my front yard I would move to the country. This is a'busy area in Edina and located just off Highway 100, do you really want people's first impression of our community to be of a pole barn ? ?? There has to be another location available in a non - +ential area. I don't think a residential and school campus is the appropriate location for a maintenance J. I know we wouldn't even being having this conversation if you were thinking of putting it up in the Country Club, Indian Hills or Braemar neighborhoods because, of course, we wouldn't do that. to our affluent residents. Would you want this shed in your front yard? It seems when ever the planning commission has no idea what to do with something they pin point my neighborhood. You have already lied to us once with the water treatment project where "we'd never even know it was there because it would all be underground" have you driven by and looked at that nightmare ?? Two cinder block access areas, with ugly mental "thing - a-majigs" sticking out of the ground, an un- sightly wooden enclosure on the corner, the fact that they never fixed the landscaping around that area and city trucks driving all over the grassy area leaving a muddy, ruddy mess!! And you wonder why we don't trust your judgement? I beg you to re -think this notion of a POLE BARN in this area, honestly ask yourselves, would you allow this atrocity to be built in your neighborhood ? ?? I think we all know the answer to that question!! Please feel free to contact me regarding this matter. Pamela Larson 4805 West 59th Street Edina, MN 55424 612- 805 -7417 1/20/2009 ti , REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V.E. Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: February 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution approving Variances at 5349 Kellogg Action ® Motion Avenue. ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Information/Background: Attached is the resolution with findings, approving the side yard setback, and lot coverage variances at 5349 Kellogg Avenue. These variances were approved by the City Council at the January 20, 2009 meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-13 APPROVING VARIANCES FOR A BUILDING EXPANSION OF A HOME LOCATED AT 5349 KELLOGG AVENUE City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Jon and Alyssa Hammar, 5349 Kellogg Avenue have appealed to the City Council the Zoning Board of Appeals denial of variances on their property for the purposes of adding onto their home. The requested variances are as follows: 1. A .9 foot (10 inch) side yard setback variance. 2. A 219 square foot lot coverage variance. 1.02 The specific proposal is to add to the north side of the home on the main floor to expand the kitchen, add a pantry and a new dinette area. 1.03 On December 18, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard the applicant's variance request. The four - member Board denied the variances on a split vote. The variances were moved for approval and seconded, however, two voted for and two members voted against the motion. The variances were denied due to a lack of voting majority. 1.04 On December 20, 2008, the property owners, Jon and Alyssa Hammar appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is an undue hardship relative to the property. The existing kitchen is very small and cannot be expanded internally. No other viable alternative for kitchen space expansion is available. The proposed use is reasonable. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building was designed and built slightly over current coverage requirements and does not have the benefit of more coverage than allowed by code without variance approval. 3. The coverage proposed is consistent with the goal of maintaining equitable building mass and coverage in existing established neighborhoods in Edina. 4. The variance would not negatively impact the neighborhood. 5. The variance supports the intent of the ordinance by maintaining consistent coverage within the immediate neighborhood. City6n 3. CITY COUNCIL ACTION 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-13 Page Two NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, the approval of variances and over - turning of the Zoning Board of Appeals denial of variances for a .9 foot, (10 inch), side yard setback variance and a 219 square foot lot coverage variance for property located at 5349 Kellogg Ave, legally described as lot 12, block 5 South Harriet Park, subject to the following conditions: No future building shall be allowed above the car port. 2. No change in roofline shall be allowed on the second floor. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on January 20, 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 20, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2009. City Clerk 0 Le F REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # V.F. From: CHERYL ENGELMAN Consent CITY SANITARIAN Information Only ❑ Date: FEBRUARY 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: MEMORANDUM OF ® Motion UNDERSTANDING - ❑ Resolution BLOOMINGTON ❑ Ordinance PUBLIC HEALTH ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve as to form the Memorandum of Understanding. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: Council recently renewed the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement with the City of Bloomington. The Agreement requires planning for, and readiness to, dispense preventative medication (prophylaxis) if needed in the event of a public health emergency. Over the next three years, Bloomington Public Health would like to engage approximately 200 -300 organizations throughout Bloomington, Edina and Richfield in a plan to assist with such medication. distribution. To accomplish this, they need a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) -signed by each participating organization. While the MOU's will be between the organizations and the City of Bloomington, Bloomington has requested that Edina and Richfield approve the MOU as to form. Bloomington Public Health will engage MOU's with organizations as follows: - Ft Year Implementation: Emphasis on those with restricted mobility to include but not limited to nursing homes, memory care, assisted living facilities and /or senior high- rises. - 2nd Year Implementation: Emphasis on large organizations serving the community at large, coordinating our approach and contact with organizations such as schools (K-12), colleges, faith, based institutions, and hotels. ,3 d Year: Emphasis on large business organizations that serve a significant number of employees locally. Partnering with community organizations in this effort will 1) provide a distribution method to augment general mass dispensing sites and 2) expedite timely distribution of prophylaxis. The Bloomington City Council approved the MOU as to form on December 15, 2008. The Edina City Attorney has reviewed and approved the MOU. Memorandum of Understanding Between The City of Bloomington And (Name of Entity) This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into between the City of Bloomington (City) and (Entity) on this the day of , 200X. WHEREAS, if a local or state emergency has been declared under Minnesota Statutes section 12.29 or 12.31; and WHEREAS, the City's Department of Public Health (BPH) is a public agency with jurisdiction over all public health matters within Bloomington /Edina /Richfield, MN; and WHEREAS, BPH will be responsible as appropriate for prophylaxis of residents and visitors in Bloomington /Edina /Richfield; and BPH provides needed prophylaxis to Name of Entity; and, WHEREAS, Name of Entity is capable of receiving and distributing medications to their population, i.e., staff and members of their households, residents /guests etc., during a declared emergency; and, WHEREAS, persons legally authorized to dispense prophylaxis may be expanded to include non - professionals as authorized in Minnesota State Statute, Chapter 12, Emergency Health Powers Act, (Page 5, Paragraph 3) or Statute 12.34, Subdivision 1, paragraph 1 as may be amended from time to time; and, WHEREAS, BPH will provide supervision as required by the commissioner of health's authorization pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 144.4197 as may be amended from time to time; and, WHEREAS, if a federal public health emergency declaration is made by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), immunity from liability under state and federal law will extend to covered persons involved in dispensing, distributing, and administering countermeasures /prophylaxis (42 U.S.C.A. § 247d -6d). Immunity under the PREP Act does not apply to willful misconduct or acts conducted outside the scope of the declaration. Therefore it is mutually agreed between the parties as follows: 1. Name of Entity and BPH shall mutually support each other in. planning for an emergency incident, including Name of Entity providing a contact person(s) to work with BPH and develop a plan for receiving and dispensing prophylaxis at Name of Entity's facility including methods of notification, critical staff contact information, plan activation steps, and plans for storage and distribution of medications. 2. BPH shall provide advance training to Name of Entity staff that will function in key positions in distributing prophylaxis. BPH will provide routine informational messages to the facility to relay to staff and their households, and facility residents /guests. 3. Name of Entity shall provide appropriate personnel to be trained in advance to dispense prophylaxis and agrees to - update staff periodically with new information provided by BPH. 4. BPH shall provide electronic and /or hard copy of all forms and information sheets to be distributed prior to and during an event. Name of Entity shall make all copies needed and provide all printed information for. staff and their households and facility residents /guests. 5. BPH shall provide the proper standing orders and medical protocols as defined by Minnesota State law at the time of the event. 6. Name of Entity shall provide to BPH the maximum potential number of staff and household, and facility residents /guests so that an adequate supply of prophylaxis may be picked up by Name of Entity upon activation of the emergency plan. 7. Name of Entity shall provide any updates of their dispensing plan to BPH. 8. Name of Entity shall conduct pre -event screening using a form created by the Minnesota Department of Health for all staff and their households, and residents when possible, and those assessments shall be maintained and updated at least annually. 9. Name of Entity shall provide one available staff to pick up prophylaxis and instructions for staff and their households, and facility residents /guests. io. Name of Entity shall dispense prophylaxis provided by BPH as per the protocol provided at time of event by the Minnesota Department of Health and /or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. i1. Name of Entity shall not charge individuals a monetary fee for medications, vaccines, or administration as provided by BPH through this agreement. 12. Name of Entity shall maintain an accurate record of the number of medications distributed by Name of Entity during an event and provide those to BPH as requested. 13. Name of Entity shall provide ongoing information to staff and their households, and facility residents /guests as directed by BPH during an emergency. 14. Name of Entity shall provide -a climate - controlled, secure room to store prophylaxis during an emergency. 15. Name of Entity, shall return any unused medication or materials to .BPH upon conclusion of the emergency response as directed by BPH. . 46. BPH shall provide the.option to participate in periodic exercises to test plans for dispensing of prophylaxis at thefacility. It is understood that: . Confidentiality of all patient information will be maintained in accordance with the current Minnesota Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Chapter 13 by both Name of Entity and BPH. 2. Name of Entity will only provide medication or vaccine to ' identified staff, households, and groups as outlined in their plan and will not provide medication or vaccine to the "general public ". 3. The participation of Name of Entity is voluntary at the time of an event. In such case, staff and identified groups of that entity would need to obtain medications or vaccine via BPH operations and will not receive preferential treatment. 4. Each party shall be responsible for- its own acts and the results thereof, to the extent authorized by law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. This in no way constitutes a waiver of the municipal liability tort limits set by Minn. Stat. Chapter §466, or as may be amended from time to time. . [Remainder of this -page left intentionally blank.] J Signatures By signing below, I agree to all of the above stated conditions and statements. I understand that this agreement may be modified or terminated by mutual agreement of both parties. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON BY: DATED: BY: Its City Manager Its: DATED: NAME OF ENTITY Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney of Bloomington. City Attorney Signatures By signing below, The Edina City Council approves this Memorandum of Understanding as to form for the purposes of public health emergency planning. CITY OF EDINA BY: DATED: May BY: DATED: City Manager REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V. G. From: Heather Worthington Consent F] Assistant City Manager Information Only Date: February 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA ❑ To Council Subject: Cellular antenna lease for Pamela Park Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Background: In fall 2008, the City was approached by T- Mobile to replace an existing soccer field light pole at Pamela Park with a metal light pole, topped by a cellular antenna array. This is a similar installation to those that were installed in Highlands Park for T- Mobile in 2003, and again for Sprint- Nextel in 2007. Info/Background: The ground equipment will be located in a wooded area, adjacent to the soccer field (see attached photo simulation). This site was reviewed by the Parks Department, and is the location they would prefer for the equipment so that they can still perform maintenance in that area. Taxes will be paid on the portion of the lease area, and calculated and invoiced by our Assessing Department. The fence which will screen the ground equipment is a six -foot high, wooden privacy fence. The light array will be replaced on the new pole by the cellular contractor. Parks staff is working with the contractor to finalize the landscaping plan, but the contractor will place as many trees as necessary to meet the city's direction. Staff would like to wait until the trees in that area leaf out, so that we can better assess the necessary level of screening. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Council approve the lease agreement with T- Mobile for a co- located cellular antenna at Pamela Park. Construction will not commence until a building permit is issued, and the contractor meets all the plan requirements as approved by the Council. Attachments: • Proposed lease • Landscaping and technical drawings • Photo simulations of proposed antenna and ground equipment SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is entered into this 3rd day of February, 2009, between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, with offices at 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 ( "Landlord "), and T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 12920 SE 38th Street, Bellevue, WA 98006 ( "Tenant "). SECTION ONE Property, Premises and Construction Landlord owns property located at 5900 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 (the "Property ") in the City of Edina, described on Exhibit "A." The primary purpose of the Landlord's ownership of the Property is to operate and maintain a public park and ball field. Subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows: A. Upon execution and final approval of this Agreement by both parties, Tenant may construct on the Property, at Tenant's expense, a 75 foot telecommunications monopole ( "Tower ") integrated into a light fixture in accordance with plans and location depicted on the Attached Exhibit `B ". The color and technical specifications for the monopole shall be subject to the written approval of the Landlord as outlined in Exhibit "C" Such construction shall include surveys, soil testing, engineering procedures and completion of federal, state and local government compliance requirements ( "Compliance Requirements ") reasonably associated with the erection of a 75 foot monopole. Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in the completion and/or acquisition of all Compliance Requirements. 14358002 RNK:r01 /27/2009 1 B. Landlord leases to Tenant: ground space on Landlord's property and nonexclusive rights for ingress and egress to the monopole (such areas shall be referred to as the "Premises" and are depicted on attached Exhibit "B "). SECTION TWO Use and Description of Equipment Upon completion of construction of the monopole, the Premises shall be used by Tenant solely for the purpose of installing, maintaining and operating radio communications facilities, including, without limitation, utility lines, transmission lines, electronic equipment, radio transmitting and receiving antennas, supporting equipment and structures thereto ( "Tenant Facilities "). The Tenant Facilities to be utilized in connection with such use is described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The design and color of the antennas, waveguide and other external equipment shall be subject to the Landlord's approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Tenant may make routine repairs, modifications, replacements, upgrades and alterations to the Tenant Facilities as Tenant deems appropriate. Tenant shall obtain Landlord's prior written approval (which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) before making any visible material upgrades, modifications, alterations or additions to the antenna, waveguide or other external equipment. Tenant agrees, at its expense, to clean and/or paint the Tenant's Facilities at the Landlord's reasonable discretion. If Tenant installs equipment or facilities on the Premises other than as set forth on Exhibit "C" or as otherwise approved by Landlord, Landlord shall notify Tenant of its obligation to immediately remove all unauthorized equipment and restore the Premises to its original condition prior to such unauthorized use at Tenant's sole cost and expense. Tenant shall be subject to additional rent as reasonably determined by Landlord for placement of more than nine (9) antennas or for any additional lease ground space other than 14358002 2 RNK:r01 /27/2009 t. described in Exhibit "C ". In addition; Tenant shall indemnify Landlord for any and all losses incurred by Landlord or other tenants or claims filed by as a result of Tenant's unauthorized use of the Premises. Tenant shall have the right to enter into contracts for co- location purposes on Tenant's Tower but any land space needed for co- locations will have to be obtained by a lease with the Landlord. Tenant may have use of the Premises for the transmission and reception of radio communication signals in the frequencies permitted by the Federal Communication Commission for communications broadcasting; for the construction and maintenance of related facilities, equipment, antennas, including the right to periodically change antenna types, mounting locations and azimuths; and for related activities. The use of the Premises by Tenant under this Agreement shall at all times be in accordance with the Technical Minimum Site Standards as described on Exhibit "D ". Subject to the terms herein, Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in obtaining, at Tenant's expense, all licenses and permits required for Tenant's use of the Premises (the "Governmental Approvals "). In addition, as long as the foregoing activities do not interfere with the Landlord's or a pre- existing tenant's use of the Property and provided seven (7) days advance written notice is sent to Landlord (such notice to include a description of the type of work to be performed), Landlord agrees to allow Tenant to perform, at Tenant's own expense, surveys, soil testing and other engineering procedures on, under, and over the Property necessary to determine that Tenant's use of the Premises will be compatible with Tenant's engineering specifications, system design and Governmental Approvals. Subject to Section Six, Tenant shall be allowed reasonable access to the Premises twenty- four (24) hours a day, 365 days a year for the use of the Premises in compliance with this Agreement. 143580vO2 3 RNK:r01 /27/2009 I, ;W"IT elat'IM" Term The term of this Agreement shall be one (1) - five (5) year ( "Initial Term "), commencing on the "Commencement Date ". Tenant may select any commencement date before November 1St 2009. If Tenant has not provided written notice to. Landlord of the Commencement date prior to November 1St 2009, this Site Lease Agreement shall be null and void. Tenant shall pay Landlord $400 upon the execution of this Site Lease Agreement for this option. Tenant and Landlord shall each have the right to extend this Agreement beyond the Initial Tenn for five (5) additional five (5) year terms ( "Renewal Term" or "Renewal Terms "). Each Renewal Term shall be on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein except for the amount of rent, which shall be determined in accordance with Section Four below. This Agreement shall automatically renew unless either the Landlord notifies the Tenant or the Tenant notifies the Landlord in writing of its intention not to renew this Agreement at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of at Renewal Term. In such case, this Agreement shall be terminated effective on the date of the expiration of the Initial Term or a Renewal Term, as the case may be. SECTION FOUR Rent Beginning on the Commencement Date Tenant shall pay to Landlord as rent, nine thousand six hundred forty ($9,600.00) dollars for the first year of the Initial Term. The annual rent thereafter shall increase by three percent (3 %) each year of the Initial Term or Renewal Terms (as described on Exhibit "E") and shall be payable in full. on or before the anniversary date of the Commencement Date each year to Landlord during the Initial Term or Renewal 14358002 4 RNK:r01 /27/2009 Term, as applicable. Rent not paid and received by Landlord when due shall be subject to a five percent (5 %) late fee and shall allow Landlord the option to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice from Landlord to Tenant, provided that Tenant does not cure the default in such thirty (30) day period. Rent for any fractional month at the beginning or at the end of the Term or Renewal Term shall be prorated. Landlord shall receive 50% of all lease revenue that Tenant receives from the Tower with Landlords written consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld). Tenant shall promptly furnish Landlord an executed copy of all tower leases Tenant enters into. SECTION FIVE Interference Landlord shall not permit its lessees, invitees or agents to use any portion of the Property in any way which materially interferes with the operations of Tenant. Such interference shall be deemed a material breach by Landlord, and Landlord shall have the responsibility to correct said interference. It shall be the obligation of Tenant not to cause interference to other tenants occupying the other portions of the Property. In the event the Landlord, Tenant or any other tenant of Landlord experiences frequency interference, Landlord shall notify each tenant of such interference (including Tenant), and will work with all tenants to resolve the interference. All parties involved in the frequency interference shall, at their own expense, engage the services of a communications engineering firm to conduct frequency interference analyses. If the suspected interference cannot be resolved by the parties involved in such interference after consultation with their respective engineers, then the respective engineers shall select an engineering firm to 143580v02 5 RNK:r01 /27/2009 act as a final mediator to resolve the frequency interference. The parties shall comply with the mediator's findings. Priority shall be given to the tenant with the longest tenure at the Property. SECTION SIX Improvement; Utilities; Access Tenant shall have the right, at Tenant's expense, to erect and maintain on the Premises the equipment listed on Exhibit "C ". Tenant shall not erect and maintain any additional items or equipment on the Premises that would change the aesthetics of the Property without the prior written consent of the Landlord. Tenant shall have the right at its expense and Landlord's approval to install, approved utilities on the Premises in order to operate the facilities described in this Agreement. Landlord agrees to grant an easement to install such utilities either to Tenant or to the public utility, for the benefit of Tenant, at no cost to Tenant. Tenant shall at its own expense arrange for separate metering of utility services that must be read from outside the surrounding fence. Tenant shall at its own expense arrange for the relocation of any utilities. Tenant shall pay for all utility services it consumes in its operations. Tenant shall restore or replace all landscaping and vegetation that has been disturbed during construction, to its original condition within sixty (60) days of completion of construction. The landscaping and vegetation shall be warranted live and healthy for a period of twelve (12) months after any such landscaping and vegetation has been restored or replaced. Tenant shall also provide Landlord a cash payment of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) prior to beginning construction of Tenant's Facilities in lieu of Tenant planting additional trees on the Property 14358002 6 RNK:r01 /27/2009 �VXII [QMIAM Termination This Agreement may be terminated upon thirty (30) days written notice from Landlord to Tenant in the event rent is not paid by Tenant on or before the anniversary date of Commencement Date of each year during the Term or Renewal Term, as applicable, provided, however that if Tenant cures the unpaid rent default within such thirty (30) day period, Landlord shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be terminated, without any penalty or further liability, following ninety (90) days written notice as follows: (1) by either party upon a material default of any covenant or term hereof (except for the payment of rent) by the other party, which default is not cured within ninety (90) days of receipt of written notice of default unless such default may not reasonably be cured within a ninety (90) day period, in which case, this Agreement may not be terminated if the defaulting party commences action to cure the default with such ninety (90) day period and proceeds with due diligence to fully cure the default and thereafter cures the default (without, however, limiting any other rights available to the parties at law, in equity, or pursuant to any other provisions hereof); (2) by Tenant if it is unable to obtain or maintain any license, permit, or other governmental agency approval necessary to the construction and/or operation of the Tenant Facilities or Tenant's business; or (3) by Tenant if the Premises are or become unacceptable under the Tenant's design or engineering specifications for the communication system network to which the facilities belong. If this Agreement is terminated, rent shall be prorated as of the date of termination, and, in the event of termination for any reason other than nonpayment of rent, all prepaid rents shall be refunded to Tenant within ninety (90) days of said termination. 14358002 7 RNK:r01 /27/2009 Upon termination, Tenant shall remove the Tenant Facilities at Tenant's cost and expense within sixty (60) days. SECTION EIGHT Taxes Tenant shall pay any personal property taxes assessed on, or any portion of such taxes attributable to, the Tenant Facilities. Landlord shall pay when due all real property taxes and all other fees and assessments attributable to the Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall pay any increase in real property taxes levied against the Premises for the period from the Commencement Date through to termination of this Agreement that is directly attributable to Tenant's use of the Premises. Landlord agrees to furnish proof of such increase to Tenant. SECTION NINE Insurance Tenant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance insuring Tenant against liability for personal injury, death or damage to personal property arising out of use of the Premises by Tenant with combined single limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00). Tenant shall also maintain fire and extended coverage insurance insuring Tenant's personal property for its full insurable value (subject to reasonable deductibles). Landlord shall maintain general liability insurance insuring against liability for personal injury, death or damage to personal property arising out of its ownership, use and management of the Premises by Landlord or its agents, with combined single limits of not less than the limits allowed by Minn. Stat. Section 466.01. Landlord shall maintain property and casualty insurance on all improvements to the Property including the Facilities. Tenant shall name Landlord as additional insured on its commercial general liability policy required to be maintained by Tenant 14358002 8 RNK:rO ] /27/2009 hereunder. Each policy shall contain a provision notifying Landlord of intent to cancel thirty (30) days prior to such cancellation. Tenant shall complete the Landlord's Certificate of Insurance form attached hereto as Exhibit "F" Tenant shall provide Landlord with proof of workers' compensation insurance covering all of Tenant's employees and agents who access the Premises in accordance with state law. Tenant and Landlord shall have the right to self - insure with respect to any of the above insurance requirements. SECTION TEN Destruction of Premises If the Premises are destroyed or damaged so as to reasonably hinder the Tenant's effective use of the Premises, either Landlord or Tenant may elect to terminate this Agreement effective as of the date of the damage or destruction by notifying the other party not more than forty-five (45) days following the date of damage. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this Section 10 shall not require Landlord to rebuild or repair the Premises upon damage or destruction. If notice of termination is given, or if Landlord or Tenant undertake to rebuild the Premises and Tenant Facilities, Landlord agrees to use its reasonable efforts to permit Tenant to place temporary transmission and reception facilities on the Premises at no additional rent until such time as Tenant is able to secure a replacement transmission location or the reconstruction of the Premises and Tenant Facilities is completed. 14358002 9 RNK:r01 /27/2009 SECTION ELEVEN Condemnation If a condemning authority, other than Landlord, takes all of the Property, or a portion sufficient, in the Tenant's determination, to render the Premises unsuitable for the use which Tenant was then making of the Premises, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date the title vests in the condemning authority. The parties shall be entitled to share in the condemnation proceeds in proportion to the values of their respective interest in the Premises. Sale of all or part of the Premises to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of the power, shall be treated as a taking by condemnation. SECTION TWELVE Notices All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested or by nationally recognized overnight courier to the addresses set forth below. Landlord or Tenant may from time to time designate any other address for their purposes by providing written notice to the other party. If to Landlord: Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 If to Tenant, to: T- Mobile Central. 2001 Butterfield Rd. Suits 1900 Downers Grove, I1. 60515 Attn: PCS Lease Administrator And with a copy to: T- Mobile USA, Inc. 12920 SE 38`" Street Bellevue, WA 98006 14358002 10 RNK:r01 /27/2009 Attn: PCS Lease Administrator SECTION THIRTEEN Title and Quiet Enjoyment Landlord warrants that: (i) it has full right, power, and authority to execute this Agreement; (ii) it has good and unencumbered title to the Premises free and clear of any liens or mortgages, Tenant, upon paying the rent, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. Landlord shall not cause or permit any use of the Property or the Premises that interferes with or impairs the quality of the communication services being rendered by Tenant from the Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant acknowledges that Landlord will need to perform maintenance activities on the Property including painting and repairs of the water tank. Tenant agrees to cooperate with Landlord in order to allow such work to be completed in a timely and efficient manner as well as ensure continuous operation of the Tenant Facilities. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, Tenant acknowledges that Landlord makes no warranties, express or implied with respect to: i) Tenant's ability to expand its operations on the Premises beyond what is depicted on the exhibits attached hereto. SECTION FOURTEEN Indemnity Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from, any and all costs (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses) and claims, actions, damages, obligation, liabilities and liens which arise out of (a) the breach of this Agreement by Tenant; and (b) the use and/or occupancy of the Property, or the Premises, by Tenant. This indemnity shall not apply to any 14358002 11 RNK:r01 /27/2009 claims, actions, damages, obligations, liabilities and liens arising from any gross negligent or intentional misconduct of the Landlord and shall survive the termination of this Agreement. . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Tenant waives any claims that Tenant may have against the Landlord with respect to consequential, incidental or special damages. SECTION FIFTEEN Assignment Tenant may not assign, or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interest in this Agreement or in the Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord; provided, however, that Tenant may assign its interest to its parent company, any subsidiary or affiliate of it or its parent company or to any successor -in- interest or entity acquiring fifty -one percent (51%) or more of its stock or assets, subject to any financing entity's interest, if any, in this Agreement as set forth in Section 18 below. Landlord may assign this Agreement upon written notice to Tenant, subject to the assignee assuming all of Landlord's obligations herein. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Tenant may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer without consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Tenant (i) has obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof. 14358002 12 RNK:r01 /27/2009 SECTION SIXTEEN Binding Effect: Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall run with the property. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, and assigns. SECTION SEVENTEN Waiver of Landlord's Lien Landlord waives any lien rights it may have concerning the Tenant Facilities which are deemed Tenant's personal property and not fixtures, and Tenant has the right to remove the same at any time without Landlord's consent. SECTION EIGHTEEN Miscellaneous The prevailing party in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, including appeals, if any. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations, and other agreements. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties. If either party is represented by a real estate broker in this transaction, that party shall be full responsible for any fee due such broker, and shall hold the other party harmless from an claims for commission by such broker. After the Commencement Date, Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in executing any documents (including a Memorandum of Lease attached hereto as Exhibit "F" necessary to protect Tenant's rights hereunder or Tenant's use of the Premises. 14358002 13 RNK:rO I /27/2009 This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of the Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect. Landlord and Tenant each agree to furnish to the other, within ten (10) business days after request, such truthful estoppel information as the other party may reasonably request. Tenant may obtain title insurance on its leasehold interest in the Property. In any case where the approval or consent of one party hereto is required, requested or otherwise to be given under this Agreement, such party shall not unreasonably delay or withhold- its approval or consent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: James Hovland, Mayor By: Debra Mangen, City Clerk Exhibit "A ": Exhibit "B ": Exhibit "C ": Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E ": Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" TENANT: T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Lo Description of the "Property" Description of the "Premises" Description of "Tenant Facilities" Technical Minimum Site Standards Rent Certificate of Insurance form Memorandum of Lease 14358002 14 RNK:r01 /27/2009 Hossein Sepehr Its: Area Director, Engineering & Operations Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651- 452 -5000 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2009, by James Hovland and by Debra Mangen, respectively, the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20099 by Hossein Sepehr, the Area Director, Engineering & Operations of T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, a "Delaware limited liability company, on its behalf. Notary Public 14358002 15 RNK:r01 /27/2009 EXHIBIT "A" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The Property is described as follows: THAT PART OF THE NE 1 &4 OF SE 1 &4 AND OF THE N 275 FT OF SE 1 &4 OF SE 1 &4 LYING WLY OF BORANS EDINA MANOR Common Address: Pamela Park, 5900 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 PID: 1902824410001 143580vO2 16 RNK:r01 /27/2009 EXHIBIT "B" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES The Premises is depicted as follows: The following are attached: B -1 Vicinity -Map, Site Plan, Enlarged Site Plan B -2 Plans, Elevations, Sections, Details EXHIBIT "C" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF TENANT FACILITIES See attachment 143580v02 18 RNK:rO ] /27/2009 EXHIBIT . "'D" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT TECHNICAL MINIMUM SITE STANDARDS 1. All equipment must be housed in an RF tight, metal enclosure that provides at least 60 db of attenuation to any internal RF signals. Desk -top base stations and open racks cannot be used without special approval; additional shielding kits may be required. 2. At least 60 db of isolation for 450 MHZ, 800 MHZ, 900 MHZ and 1800 — 2000 MHZ transmitters and 30 db of isolation for 150 MHZ and 40 MHZ transmitters must be provided; a harmonic filter must be provided on the transmitters between the antenna and any ferrite device used. Additional filtering and isolation may be required and will be considered on a case -by -case basis. 3. Maximum transmitter power allowed into the antenna feed line will be 110 watts per transmitter. (Higher power levels will be considered on a case -by -case basis; additional protective devices may be required.) 4. Only jacketed copper Heliax cable will be permitted for transmission line at the site. All on -site intercabling must use RG /9, RG /142, RG /214 or' /2 inch Superflex. RG /8 or any other single shielded cable will not be allowed. 5. Proposed transmitters that will cause second order, third order or fifth order intermodulation products on existing receiver frequencies will not be permitted on the site. A receiver with the same frequency as an existing second order, third order or fifth order intermodulation product at the site, will not be permitted on the site. 6. All transmitters shall be equipped with band -pass cavities that will provide at least the following attenuation of side band noise, if needed: 40 MHA band: 50 db at 1 MHZ 150 MHZ band: 50 db at 1.5 MHZ 450 MHZ band: 50 db at 2.5 MHZ 800 /900 MHZ band: 50 db at 10 MHZ 1800 /1900 MHz Microwave PCS: 50 db at 20 MHZ 7. Each cabinet must be identified by the owner's name, address and FCC station license; it also must have the name and telephone number of the responsible service agency. 8. Prior to approving any application for antenna space at the site, an engineering study will be conducted by the Engineer for the City of Edina, consisting of at least the following items: 14358002 19 RNK:r01 /27/2009 Intermodulation interference (IM) calculations of all transmitters and receivers known to exist in the area at time of application. (Study will include 2nd, 3rd and 5th order IM terms, and A + B — C, three- product terms.) Transmitter noise and receiver desensing calculations of all equipment at the site. Analysis of best equipment and antenna locations at the site. Analysis of AC power requirements. Report to prospective site user regarding application. 14358002 20 RNK:r01 /27/2009 EXHIBIT "E" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT RENT Beginning on the Commencement Date Tenant shall pay to Landlord as rent, nine thousand six hundred forty ($9,600.00) dollars for the first year of the Initial Term. The annual rent thereafter shall increase by three percent (3 %) each year of the Initial Term or Renewal Terms (as described on Exhibit "E ") and shall be payable in full on or before the anniversary date of the Commencement Date each year to Landlord during the Initial Term or Renewal Term, as applicable. Rent not paid and received by Landlord when due shall be subject to a five percent (5 %) late fee and shall allow Landlord the option to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice from Landlord to Tenant, provided that Tenant does not cure the default in such thirty (30) day period. Rent for any fractional month at the beginning or at the end of the Term or Renewal Term shall be prorated. Landlord shall receive 50% of all lease revenue that Tenant receives from the Tower with Landlords written consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld). Tenant shall promptly furnish Landlord an executed copy of all tower leases Tenant enters into. 14358002 21 RNK:r01 /27/2009 EXHIBIT "F" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE LIABILITY & WORKERS' COMPENSATION The Certificate of Insurance Liability & Workers' Compensation is attached. 14358002 22 RNKa01 /27/2009 EXHIBIT "G" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF LEASE BETWEEN CITY OF EDINA ( "LANDLORD ") AND T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC ( "TENANT ") A Site Lease Agreement ( "Lease ") by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Landlord ") and T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "Tenant ") was made regarding the property described on the attached Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein for all purposes. The Lease is for a term of five (50) years and will commence on the date as set forth in the Lease (the "Commencement Date ") and shall terminate at midnight on the last day of the month in which the fifth (5`h) anniversary of the Commencement Date shall have occurred. The Lease shall automatically renew and extend for five (5) additional, five -year terms unless written notice is provided by either party within sixty (60) days prior to one of the five termination dates. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed this memorandum on the day of , 2009 (effective as of the date of the last party to sign). LANDLORD: City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: DO NOT EXECUTE Printed Name: Its: Mayor Date: By: DO NOT EXECUTE Printed Name: Its: City Clerk Date: 14358002 23 RNK:r01 /27/2009 TENANT: T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: DO NOT EXECUTE Hossein Sepehr Its: Area Director, Engineering and Operations Date: 143580v02 24 RNK:r01 /27/2009 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS., COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before rile this day of 2009, by and , respectively, the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority'granted by its City Council. STATE OF ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2009, by Hossein Sepehr, the Area Director, Engineering & Operations of T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. (Use this space for nouty stain /seal) Exhibit "A" to Memorandum of Lease Legal Description of Property The Property is legally described as follows: THAT PART OF THE NE 1 &4 OF SE 1 &4 AND OF THE N 275 FT OF SE 1 &4 OF SE 1 &4 LYING WLY OF BORANS EDINA MANOR PID: 1902824410001 TAX DESCRIPTION: Exempt property Common Address: Pamela Park, 5900 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 143580v02 26 RNK:r01 /27/2009 -1 [ a F� Egy H ' . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Mobile VICINITY MAP , PROJECT DATA . BwN sr '� sPoBi ww InORwlr S !S ,r ®a n (ap9 i0r0 e>m�er� .nom, ,.•.. � mwRN , P.m snlx ,r R >a enla Yw1, sx[ wEr aasB s Pray N ♦1 ,,�„� u- ER -aal- 65 GENERAL NOTES SCOPE OF SUPPLY PROJECT TEAM ,. ra mrlv[e1a aNaa iY[,IS� Nm a¢er .0 Eaa I¢Rp wi �[ sans Nm .TTplr®I. K wula Q 3aer TEDUM i01 [LL ooltilwCta tfaa4 lan ®. rmo[Rlts. PNRaaIE] w aaom rm m0mplw: M .Ix raa11R0. v M Ym im M tMK% 1 M mnIRILM 9iL 1Rr M J® tm m lEam M fiO[ d .ml /IO O01[p Ja SIR fOQlaa [almw w Ym Ilmro ro Ia2wxe4 naellra sml¢ JEi Rwnrsa mowal. 1 M CiaarR1011 9Wa aEliY ell E101[rfi mNm9 Jun BNmtsaa PIm1 ro sumem,R m Ba J"r osornllsss. cwl[oc'IS a al®a4 Et< s,ma E novno ro ra e1YNIBBI esaa rlt2amw .Iw 1Mem0"` l M CRIIIRICm1 BWa PARIELT .lL .iLS OIY[Q .la w• ooai lawn warwrnlma Rw.i m xa .lp oineR OMMCIIO♦ arirlle¢ a @PIOR sxru Be EimumT NWR®a wn.®m ra 8.11..if.IpN v M 1ENmlr a Bl01P MM. a alaAS R�IGTNL N M ORplSE M GinRltliL S M Wae.C1011 UiL R[ wiea�L ral. K SNYe AFAIVf a Immr..Ir[ noon. wllv[a. a wTAmN W1I1al[1 a YmwlJd! a Na O1YIZ .rml BYLL a ,M vaa RmY[R¢ Y tv ta l M U, [.IL m w auwa1R u a I1 l i i ®Ca11n1 Nnw . iaa IaraMi a . wlaw e.rs .YR sou [nom srlwr ranNLL oJa m a[Nep nmaaoR mame11m1, ra1mlR wla aram�e lea mourpn v .ax Ju .n[9 .Ia ro eE tss ". am1 ar Topllpe a M vm v sal "R 7. M mNi1LiON i sw[oR10 ra wn PNVOn aNi OUamRTUr Yi 9YLL wAAIE NR RNYRm Pm4AR v ra MIEN m oaalt Nlla a iT10. a R fNYa K M N@'OXSall1 a M CeYlRltla m mxartia sou eon Na mv® Ia Ntwi a NLII/mM 01111[lli5 a Rl1m PNBrFNrt RIa11®w m1YiCIM iw M Faallil LL YlR L M OUaRifal 9MlL R l�F M M OLOIO[ iaill a M SIl[ YN{e ra U " RpU® .rp IiR M JOB a fAMm wN ]® INe ./2002 rR1 JY@9p115 • 7$[ m SANE YR1w eO0[ ,n .la malpcml .m ,eia mwr m M uac 4m .61i1M Ut>1:•SS RmS MRIC mIw M m/OVarR ,. M mnwna Ym Jrl stimmunai p,aa mnz .Ia IJYi1 o,UE emuma Nm srae taRrnnvR Rv mu,R.[ Nmamua Na Mss v summa a.Tn (RSu amemns Aso m M mm >ma v rim li M m[INlaa swL aola Nm nv ra .Yr rsiElg ucom w1R RlaEtmis xo2s.N ra PE,maaYl¢ v M mm Nm nOJas Tl,og " M Imr v ra .m m M ai[n. ,a rlaam mmeori wm[ nlavnvla RwN a..[p stns m® nmwer ® W- M rtm Ilam SPECfIWaT pmD, a Nm wwwa .Ilr W,tTWa vr-mE a Haaw1 Na Wl6ilNxtaa, IRlla ra .mwr.+ v Ialrp amass Nwc amt sw® r.Rar Ju2wL r.10 aEl®l6 a tmnYrtla wlaa mmvr M avEEA v.wr mans a USCImWtm .ma M 0(wl[r oBOOmR Ylm M m1IML eRONa11R IYp M wRR C4QIYa PRpI ro FIIOIIIp M Ym N URS101. ,a a0m[c1a swu ,Enn M sNV�I •¢Ras Nw fO®F1m IR®Iw. IOdR YRr 1Tp'DRwi. a lm �IIBt 061"YYr TP/� WiL1Q .UYI 5 fOYOYm. Yu E wmaER nm ns[ o Im RBEC11wr ro M RDd RTILS .w MO ®m 9A TI[ 00 W9aa v M OmCI Y[Im Y®cnoa tW s BlaliFO u P.w n ra toast ,a ommw uewoB e1i IRtvaia m a aan slE10 Imrm n M muwnRY maR ar6lwcnia R ILIrINCIa 51WL TC OIYI® fi W Y0� 1p0 LN R[ WR[ �O! M06IDIO mM M tnax ' �"mmsox�otlmTM;°VM1° tOMlnlCla Ilra iE910a NP�JYImR irE11 ptltr I011w0.�� M almml sN1LL i emYED fa axoa,loi Barra wlBame .IIY mw[c ,a M 0RR 1Y1 S1wL A1011p! IIL 1®110 1LOY14 BN]BNG rANmp, wMU]a a RnQJ1 SlePaa ra .Ia RHEA REIw q[p1w.i M'IYILL L UA NApYm Nllla 9Wa a 1QPI ". P4Y ®IEO a,wL Im E usm n Ya[Rma a,1 mamnmY sc 9W1 i2lRT tillE Of010M,1a. M mM,1eN2a SMNa Pc l.rMa vtmmrax o .oIv�L Nu n BO6 .moo .ID Y Eo: um ll oo : R ullmQu R M : ,, e � � amRla ai vnsnuw�m wl"�no �soor[� zn,o wmm. lmrta9 9®Rt➢6 Ty tm W tarulilNl .Rmm w. tzlID d a� 511Qr ®u ¢ tw me � �^'�'_. OI'I 6 fM. r® M 22 meq� u.m�.. IDO!!l�1m� [�f� 1® IirOC olv®s �I 0.4 IYYFII IRYD gal[ m YNQRry W 9121 ®m'i --s; � w v RAW LANG SITE /� CO- LOGTON SITE Im lmrpl � ®n TRIP emwm n 011wC1a1 Im BA PI.Rai nm® T-YG9{[ mnum n LOr1IN[L'la aR PI.Tai r -Y,anc mm[cla Rn lurrRwl [wane, mlm[clm mlmtcTRR r0YRl1 a RIa PI/RiOwl Fn11alIW OYIRYCIM @IIR1CIm M191 fI�RT PpF v—) T- WI1IR/L1m1 PI/®L tSIRIIET (- 01/Rlm rtiwB1E mIMKIW MIROL G[[Qr - d1r1[li6 rtil ®l! m11nICIRR PI/Iml r. - wT1O1m r•a1mIE Wwuaa a9 aYran r-mmle mlmala SITE DIRECTIONS eRCwlaTe TIE awwsemll NaExu rti1mlE taxrNalRe T -IIL mm4Cla IL1a aiw T-YDme RBNIN[tla -Spit mltYl Plm . Im0. IMI ICR OI ,ao ®m r. ti mL an .Iwm uianYn� .Ip lY IOn Wai lIY4 YY8 is m 11111Q K �B YU m riled a ICUs m m0 R. nw eaM l['!m a �p Yiw a YM s ,K IYiR OppM m0 rn.N tlBtt T-Y®IE mYMSCl01 Ju1.a GBIES T -Y ®F mnY/Llml JIOROI fi19aE TIE m11111GN1 w QRY IWg Mna'lll) T�IG®a mRPIGT011 w [CRY ,pR .IYI.W i -1®E mllpilClpR Uq[p[Q 1p1a apl mU r�lp®E mIMIOpR OiERYf wla ra CW Tti OaRrtla pR fMla[p Ypaaa mnwtla 0awaa sR OOINap aRwWA minlrna mxaaia unlMi wi,[c oR • aYOar mr,waa mmuaa URL Y IiW BGOR ®p GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ii— m pr m nm m 1NL a mmYna .aImwIDa®WF B4imi¢ rip ((®m1r mm1,1wRlYfl:,Oa n ea umm (RYa [ n E 1m 9 wta fRawwrmIN r1c ,a a mnwna, maws a [wwma: Ismsmam tm" mlaltia mnmcrn mtlRlaa orx,wnm YYi". ,�� t- am- u-t�ia um0meo .as mn.rna caaA.aa slam aaw.tla mswna CODES AND STANDARDS °'°°°' mlrN.cla aaawna PMA �w¢r a taRN ® Ram.era wrtwna ABBREVIATIONS p�6 Bla Y HElwyd duP Ga rNa 0.41 NT .mYL ANm1 [EOaN al. LLMP llli A .BOU[ QPM 4L e[lfJ2 WIaa1C IA.�m 8Am1 Rars[ P� mRFwaP1� tiv/rnT m. aaa w mw01 RL o1Stm[II Rpl mE]Yla OIrJY USOwYL OR aaM AJLT MONeRA w otarmor a Janes m ba RMI p wRl¢i MWff([I arloi ptR..rl(S) 0. s01 Y YLIf1, d MtRpl M YaIDR� LOIO. LOIOMIIr Y!G Yv " taaNrtr �' p�m'llep � RNQL d aJILL M PII.S[ cu.. �a1® nvr of 110 wm auYU® sR1a �I+Re Y[T"[ sY npla, v. InF PtZt ew nw[ntt4 YII. larJa rrE pro noes iouaRx[ Ni g Yee Tm T�iwuL R u.YNaaM m LLtaEn wEr PI- nN[ v .um a two ems. iRIwBR W .a,1e1e1pv v. slalui rar r,11plw Iaa11 sT a'm w une9 Nam anwlQ ®Ea saavaww s,n soralm sn s1[n SIwIR. SIiL'Iimh iae. Q P.a�imR �. nrR S 6 [LIB V to 6 BRRa 6 DRAWING INDEX •IPoW[ -n .. iYIIRtT [aONwlIU1 IJIR RU1UYL wllp •�PoYN -Rl ..... p,E PIN! PoBBB-0 ..... ENAn® 9R PuN .,PoBSM, ..... Nllpa. NUOMRYI .lO IO.R1 Elilmlpll .IPoBeaYI ..... wLBOrla ! REalS .IPoW-L ..... SLIIRIU ! RTN$ .IPNO[ -EI ..... Pipl ! OwNRMR MN starpllw a1M.T sYlnlw - .ta U) - saaPo tm a ! m a mlwmr Gial! n.Y ! n0nil lo! Blawllw - m It) - atarmam tsama mm.art oaveT PWI SUpY�d taR Sa1mYp - wa snE NelaomR Y®Wm SiaPo -.lf 1 - rplap >PE6WYa Eadlp - 1 - SUIRY® OSIISia 4[d.QYU siwllw - m t - wIwEY ! aw aiESw SPON'w1101a GWOMO - m hl - sarp[m NnpY RR.a [aIX4,1a - - °- �0p -°--' - -'--- -- ..• __ _� _ Yn® -,.96 swprlw - xi (t1 - snrcllm ^ ^,oru amolpra mawE smpw - Im (t7 - �sNmam mamelol smra,Qa mlwE rpm slYa 1 aaram - m I,) - � mmw�amx sfarw,pra 1pm a BYra4a - sa (q - sarmup mwllr PWrai ratima PIN4 arms Np RERaa nmpYp - m lif - smm mwmlr wuRm vmtwnw swnw - m l) - � @�rv[�.,m� ........ y®. -- — '� - - - � 1,1 - arwmw w mu aw! .aRws - �gip�rpf n0 T USCON61 a lain ROa manlRM mlmlilOn Ye1FA tn611Y NL maiicllvl BMII m10.Y tnx M uror JIDDIIm fII1v1 6 M rplpiYR rtlmaSliRrm 1. 6m f.Y:1YiV1 ffin Pon TLSIRIR NRI Y.T[1wI� Ya (Nlor Rveme YamRlq ' "'� WO'fdN �� °' sm �p� m f.wRaEl taEmc 9�,0 a 6 dRpNaIUY[ i6Ra] O04 a 10pr PUBama M.IIIIENr v rEp�larlUO >. JYB 4YE,Y' YpIUYL 9aOMYe E61RY10 S ELL (TatlnnE 6 E16'IIwK NO pSlmil wvmW L lot OYMYE paCIRlL ®Q to REIa Plwlaa p6iwGL ,.II[6.a1N16 A»MaeO 11. MES QI.1aaML F1f11RdL SSf[IT �n ti RsY (a>2NmraltlL swm JM Ir u1N wmmiTOJ) l LL WmY,URl 6 ®D JPp lalfn IlwlA II1I111M WATER TOWER SITE ROOFTOP SITE 1101 ruaeln®n mwraum n na nmm® Rar.um n ggrypl T— awlwcT® BpQ1RP PIIRfam1 T�2 fQlwlaal RR SWiOb iaailna aem�Gla RamCIRN IiO1V NIIORU Sm /.TUURIYr rylCm[ mlmY]RI1 patl2ra WQT p=vm<a) Tie mm[tia rlima ttl9 V..u% udl Tea a.1N[aa PIEIa1L Wa.T - wTlp® T-Y®F mla[Cla, P1ima tliaT - wnois T -11®P 19RRICla B9 GIwIEIB T -11®E OMRY:IUI eR a9E1B TEL maP 1a IRrI[MU i "�- mI1MCM pnp4le Tie taw[[la mla aiE TtipiE mrtNlc,a aaa tlwe t-Y ®P mNwICIa1 LEGEND amem tlae T-YOme mnN[na !less camas r Ea[lAa'la RY sa) w YRm N B ea r�lRwt m1m.nRN w Oa wla NwsvA) T � tmmina amlalip pls sa ma r�ImLL r<N,N.c1a, ptmarvp ma rat mla rtilRwlc mN,Nlcra �� i1t� 1 DETAIL sIR amuxowR w,Ewp1 mwwnRN mNI0.1C1pN sR omeowa YpEWm.B [RN,NSnaN axmlcnRA sR amuxowR wlawu .Rmlw .rYOUIOR OamB mmuemn ooaArnm RorIN[elRn mwNrcla Tm RPoliom wrwue .wOEI. YROnYp oee ! araa maN.c,a mwwnon mwalcrRN awwcra 51 a tma aoYE xwa .n mmY 1 q0� 2 SECTION NJIOEI. YRIwIRp Pe[ a Beaoal mxatrRN toTIN.c1ae NMIRP mla .mnamns cex,NSC1a mxlNrtim .awaaoe elmce (®r m m1I mlw.na mnwna IxmommNm .m mwwna mwwna mi .m0emra PRYO1) oaw.c a taY,wnaN slow mmmcTa mwwcTa [010= wTlw<ia mnwnBN Iwo ®wax • ota Bm oa,Neela mtm.aa IAWIM ,Yaw OUmMtla owllnrt,aR IRIEA uIB11T MIM1 snow awtlicla mllw0a Si 10 a .Im1 Um1la 81:IYI .aB aeYJ Pap! ®R0. a m[,OI ea OaIPKIUI mrw/tla Y[IFA uRm RRIa m ®m ® o_ . T . . Mobile . MINNEAPOLIS MARKET Io1ax Ne ouio xn for m1a �� uo a M � sae .l om Te mtln N i n.a R la Ta omM s I.a[ ma .- pEa awY r n N Pp MPo Y.IU® C ® M MA rLL Im i ememR, aa'EnJ IM a Zia Nlr�imvsE �ttw rMwBl�o� rler�m 'e"'+a b •E I—I 1 s 1O1 • + w mm + m ./ri- ..~.1 ` ~� "" cat B ao w Ieallm n PAELA P- A-- RK - EDINA PROJECT INFO. & GENERAL N OTES 1 I ®En ra NwnRa ®p 1wR4 „nIM 2 1 R/La ♦ ® a MINA. MN 55424 w "° - m o i 0 iu A1P0606 -T1 °a na a w 0 .e.Nr,msaamtRi ei f pa[ Y 1 .S 9 I 3 8 I 1 1 1 1 1 j ■ ■ a ■ i p Y 9® I1OII• ,000m m9, 091■r0 tm eat .a ro le wan w wo® aro lo,oat .r ,ws . +�t mae m[ snalaa ■ wmI �•n.l• -e0 a 6ai.aDe (rrP. (>J ILGYafOI t(, ANTENNA LAYOUT 6 � exta,•,• k § i ,mG'"ea""abawm m9.a aanl• m o m ,aaw ,ol9dti •x,EMa �° rrec w' TIM ENLARGED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION mt■L lnE ma¢ml p Ow ma cmt u tlma -0naml v o al tad ry m ri tm' fd tau ar ma�' ttwt Im LJ o .a /s• ,an m q tmO°� (omoa mmwam m a9ou IOITK 9m nou �t m n rlm�tt -Im �� •a9■o ro¢ minitr eeo x-xux rotor 9almw ,tr nensm me® °9��y o lw mt pl avow o A li ac IW �'� �I161.O aua m w9s 1. .xls•a ,aat Iawmw x.6 ®1 mnmm et>m a ,1� rmaa cart Iawm,9 IIDm .•a ..exm.a,t ro w6 xm ,an9®m z a,sn nx xaewoa 96 m e•1a a9mno9 eeTani w,avv, cat Iar,ala9 Imam tw ,apt exma tElwn9 rn„auay. i Ivwve�atwlo /a s w� ¢nwirn�nueR � (al ♦ ra v vinol (MI19•a rani a ••t: a tmw c u m os,6r mama, curt 3 •naFl■•t/m9 oaa 9W1 lla■� Cma• ,a9 aaa® r9¢ (a1 Iona x tx■ra n ralaaa: � m�i■¢xa• m r�� 1°4I arc f1• Im111E■11 s laart9, a rantrt ae em 16DYIrILL1 m■ec'Im m G �9ffi9 rM[r OOFLtIw 1O1r. •. •aao■w wI 90, sau 1•WL: xwm a r,m tm tan d-0• o.m. 6 utl9■a ffi.'1019 9N1 t r�9■En alx 1111E IOOx n 9m a ra sac rmx. IapaC caw o u usr a n,l[ atw,a LM Iaaxaam(rs onwaau v : ttmm9taa v a rm,nvsau o 9wm■9ta9 a onwa,fu a,v • nmmotaa atv aaa 191 IDWL ffi.LLTatWIpW t m Garb tmatm F1611rlL vaan! a ttl6 v ■a••urtva >. r+mt v onm9 aa. nw ffi rrnna r=ffi U aR lln9••i. I. onl Mme cast .Wont tawr sm,on99 tax rum, mwo•1n. faatas tnv m x ,19v11m . .nlotw •I• tat•o� sat •m.maala exta,•,• ®11 RJR" 1113111104M i ta,ua 9nt •x,EMa �° rrec w' TIM ENLARGED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION mt■L lnE ma¢ml p Ow ma cmt u tlma -0naml v o al tad r/s• m m tm' ran• ttwt Im w1Q na tnalc tta wR Saw natnv .ts 9 ra tau rroonr o ra[ - ,aat,wn tax9r .,m , 1O",v „a06a �1,1°,e°p1 o nd /s• ,an m q 1fa• /.` �t m n rlm�tt -Im v v o lw i pl avow o ,m n• m m/9ar a, lfln0 -01101 V O Mobile 1>d tats n IID• e 1Wa RILa D11NA UN 55.21 nd /C aw .L110 n ,� /■' mwe m1s m w v n 174 R (>) tnuaow n tae rT (,0 tslnnos a tl®1 -0tlFlml atv v m L12W a/.• I 1—t V tae r/0• rlgt RIL M tad 1/■• t ` 916 a 1 lad 1/•• 099E LE a nm -0ua -aml atv v ° tau r/a• p1 aau6iw. f• 1>d 1/0• (a1 s1cNs pp • Ian l06 IIARlO19, ma ro Iwmw o.af9 m ,aalan.cr9, m ■9xa artiv6 9m 9ua •xano coax, mwme 6o aeaE 6mn ®11 RJR" 1113111104M i w6te sn Iaa6n .n■m Am IOO1t n m,nacla� •x,EMa �° rrec m ENLARGED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION mt■L lnE p .0 mwl o~ ,faw � em t ea w1Q na tnalc tta wR Saw natnv .ts 9 ra tau rroonr o ra[ - ,aat,wn tax9r .,m , 1O",v „a06a �1,1°,e°p1 o ��"+ ara a tm s a. sm a mats t® a wan m„A•/m xtrac au r-•me ,aau v:9a to u : - � ' 1 a =0 M APPW L ,■1xL � as ,ara r l9tx • 5 MOM �a 9 ®wloly Ta , atama 9ma e119® r- ed 1s• ,mrn ma n■oo, tovat naxr n®c •mo,s; me oa9as�• "-- te9xs7 m ,aw ovm w na tom, tax s ,aalan.cr9, m ■9xa artiv6 9m 9ua •xano coax, mwme 6o aeaE 6mn star vmag It091 m wooga of sna w9r x1nm, x ,aa„m ,aaa® 11mM ro mtawravla w6te sn Iaa6n .n■m Am IOO1t n m,nacla� r$,w vex ---- - - - - -- �r�oae ,a•. m9ra xa ,. ranwatawc case eat• ,�� aanra .■aana90 w ■t9 e d maamm ,� 6�raary9v m ENLARGED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION s.■r. .1 v .0 swe 6• -t•d h awl em t ea w1Q na tnalc tta wR Saw natnv .ts 9 ra tau rroonr o ra[ - ,aat,wn tax9r .,m , 1O",v „a06a �1,1°,e°p1 o ��"+ ara a tm s a. sm a mats t® a wan m„A•/m PAMELA PARK -EDINA Al PO608 ANTENNA INFO. B TOWER ELEVATION to u : - � ' 1 a =0 M APPW L a a MOM �a . ,N4 era rat 9om oven boat . nm9■ I■naar . . . . . Mobile r as ,Iw�a ra corm la® . ,mmm mm. rsv ,w micas w v atmv a •mcaT o lam cal ear cacao¢ ana rw, rww v d „,� /,f (. /�- r _ �n T- e ® D11NA UN 55.21 _ a NINNEAPOUS MARKET n.rom �'■ •"" ■tea —■ A1PO600,A1 4 ytl ill t a a a t' g� 7 a B {� WALL TRANSFER l \QJ SNncH \ r °®'uan I I w ro v rse m ImRLL1N 10m a `.M- a � o O ame oaa.lcla. •u ea � sa b minl®..c nGlm 0.NOm •ID3J1 mum m M .aa m nm mn�.c r-.®a r mmur ro w mm1,W 0 I 0 Iraoort, rm. 0000 00 0000000000 . sa m.vL mmur ro waonu veer /W Ix I..e ql IF1W I pr.ax•.*7 0.�r•omro 'PVC � M1fY.]e' nmvm 0.1�om swan mum uaunm ro ummort. mm md.u� ro ee pair mm�ilu �ilvn�wl rum pamuE rm ImID YI,aAGO1 Ug e� uesrlm ( Ymm01 ro 0.r.Dm Bu•II mum. Iwo+mm w cvnsw:rosl ��� a I I I r a oaom •,•a 0000000000 I I I eanol v .p reeleY mnn rtm. I I I I m mwima rmsrau m v 1m.VL Awn awo. I 4 I mm vats m lA a .as I lel I I' I' b I I Iel I I I I I I I Lel I: I I I I I I L H —FRAME 0 L AI , ..... I �I u• 1•• ®.n rm aflm0il elan sm ommnol •b m9a6 .YL 0.0 TAE A0f1.3T msn Inmac • AMRA Kau M- aR111[ Pa[ (m (1. M. SIX b U' Lf.rm t CONCRETE SLAB 1.n p�4 �m/MN IMr lama rmix vamp .a. for nml wmm .o r Gj' a,M e"'i� � d n�n°s1a.•P°"� ®Ima• e ra anx Ilmronr v raa - l..•uvv sum a.. a uvr ro M smocl wl Mw a • T Mobile r �a.`a�a...•m.�l„olm M Ilw m na! MK M .m1.1101 ..mom mr'Oiraam m wawl rt ulal wmu¢r rm ua® anmes ®asm v o�mn m u�°Oolmi rms +� 'fir Itip im YR .lan$ m0 TNYI .Mml rt O .I..aen MINNEAPOLIS MARKET n,l•,m PAMELA PARK - EDINA Al P0606 SECTIONS 8 DETAILS E)INA. UN 55424 AIP0606S1. e• 0 4 e E� pat Y Op1911 Imm 1. mllwlCl YOOwW I m wwa mTrlm >a wlx mNL m GAfJ 0 910V�L 1 p 4' w10r IwIr60® X0®1 M M wR um M mlC1 O M l101m®. Y OOmMmOrt m OiL 1Y xm0 w wmwl w0I v WC m Y 4'<' wpplplf roll rwlu wKl� 4. ®IIIIK'IOI m 06041 Cd mom wwu w FmOS lnm'Ix v mFlol ww wrt: sR mm win o0Mf7.T ll® CI0110 fI6D m M mw rmC YYW ra14'e fao4Elrt walaw. 6 mMYmOO m rt[110w 06110® w6 m wblL mlmol. C \ SECTION Tyr C t d8 ! wr e.lr ®� ® I r.+r orl or pw awwealw w sin PAMELA PARK - EDINA 1 I ®m mR NwmAl Ims 11O °1i'�° 'w ®' ^°°® wa e M 0l wnan or r-Imc - 4wura6 °,r Gai~ iwiw r"Z.w:l.r wlor b.0 r v. •m. r 4lnwels mm w 4. YOM �l lllgm Al P0606 z l 6sEn a4mwvon • T. • • M ob •w?� it e r mil? OIM� lOU > 11O ram m lolrl rt lov �r ua rum 41mr v Imlmwl®. Nm lOrt a �jg� SECTIONS 8 DETAILS 3 I"" = " � M r�'�' 4 I/I1p li\SG omlw•E • AIMM 14PIf aOmwR 0 ® ®v awrnY oa o�lu. Is mm ww rlr winos ona Illw wrW o e .%l✓ `I r m� �� 'P w v D]INI� MN 59424 rim �m g MINNEAPOLIS MARKET w" �s A1P0606S2 4 t 3 NEW UTIUIY SERVICE roe moues N nn•ev ro ne nm em�.a anus w¢v w m wum ONE - UNE DIAGRAM rma a.a wnn.nr STANDARD (24OV) °fL"rALNO ° a.e�ol �.a d1 - grl m mar ama \ \ \ uemm�anwvmm �iw"° ` \ m� �. f�.if vii so�vuw�m >. r� aa.m ma m risu aoom e� � /•. n r we arum Naa a meucme na mar s mama mn ms oB m was mar /mw� uwm wra�rs a u• wsuai m ass m a M NlLIIL ,RIFT fin r� wem emmmmlN s .0 m.a•m mo¢mw m s � wm oa.mw: wnR wawm once wxFnwg g) LA Iwa man mono .rrmm v vFinaw anwwF. v mw•R.r •seer gFR m•F. ewr a exo �e mnG gL wmFa 6 wTil Ire[ i g•aFFO �f alFa O.R ra m"'°"wrt. .. nu x a.nmc� ®m wu mom Co ap s; man meulaee aTFem a uc war r �.Zr was w wn m oaa erlw usw v grave PI b m _ ____________--------------- . /.... ... .. " ..... WIRING DIAGRAM 3A e wwwewa m emmaaE sm war uRm r.au Im� rw uwnr wmF m exr caFalnena .mc g[ woos n I NWR ®m tm awaaL : i � ra mecmcvi a i rm icwsc eu wT r,F®E imEg I.AYNI eeegT FNxOUe s elnFNx Frnrt 1 avers es R w�l J `i wvwgn mm aws Fos �anw war ma F.wTFVo I j�.N w•.,.m wewieao w.we a.w, 11 \\ oa ww Y..,FwmF Nw ew sl sever auo am -nwwu � 4A .. Nno¢ eml wN I• eem maea , \ \ HH 9 wee vma n FeOI m.ww. ♦\ (\ ap ..n \ rma a.a wnn.nr ane• ra r¢ d1 - grl m mar ama \ \ \ uemm�anwvmm �iw"° ` \ m� � , • X \ N we gNnrt ./ .w: ` - wa. m lIL1Ta 91[ wwwewa m emmaaE sm war uRm r.au Im� rw uwnr wmF m exr caFalnena .mc g[ woos n I NWR ®m tm awaaL : i � ra mecmcvi a i rm icwsc eu wT r,F®E imEg I.AYNI eeegT FNxOUe s elnFNx Frnrt 1 avers es R w�l J `i wvwgn mm aws Fos �anw war ma F.wTFVo I j�.N w•.,.m wewieao w.we a.w, 11 \\ oa ww Y..,FwmF Nw ew sl sever auo am -nwwu � 4A .. Nno¢ eml wN I• eem maea , \ \ HH 9 wee vma n FeOI m.ww. ♦\ (\ \ r u u mlec d1 - grl m mar ama \ \ \ uemm�anwvmm �iw"° ` \ m� � , • \ ¢Nog .m'r .1 `% , ® �rl . \ eTa rew new :":":':":- :':':.::.'.::�:', m"'°"wrt. _ ____________--------------- . /.... ... .. " ..... \ �� Fowl moe _ �� ` __ __._ _.__.__ .... ....... ... _ - '--a a/nm N "Y - �" yy ..... ... ...... .... .... ... ..... ...... ........ ....... ..... -- .. ." ... ......... .... .. .... ........... ........ - ...... POWER AND GROUNDING PLAN .rvc . v a• ' sez mass Nn .n Na wama s •,rra nom earanr v .�ssc - nvrwm � m n. se.ou aw nm =TT,= • ■ M o 1 is s.. s n msowo� v wg mrnar wawom wu. • 1 1 e r nc pax v m acs. nc aowm raasa ww. wsa m s onoau� wLL Nm s � ma. � a n mTTUna uNa® ®v warn• a saxm\.. Na ea/a un nm� wool nw1 nc� rt w wwmm MINNEAPOLIS MARKET PAMELA PARK - EDINA 3 AIP0606 FFn•� POWER AND GROUNDING PLAN g9`} E7IW NN 93424 View Type: Original Photograph -r_ x Site Address: N44'53'37.59", W93° 20'00.09" City: Edina State: MN Site Number: Al P0606 E View Description: Looking north at proposed W location of 75' monopole tower from ., viewpoint of about about 500' away. le 1 of 2 µ£ View Type: Original Photograph -r_ x Site Address: N44'53'37.59", W93° 20'00.09" City: Edina State: MN Site Number: Al P0606 E View Description: Looking north at proposed W location of 75' monopole tower from ., viewpoint of about about 500' away. le 1 of 2 c • AU y �r Sad w Disclaimer: This picture is an artist's rendition of the completed r Al— site layout prior to construction. The completed construction may vary in layout. dimension, and color from the above picture. , :;_.,.�•:' „� �? W oy�, "&4 View Type: Simulated Photograph Site Address: N44° 53'37.59”, W93° 20'00.09" City: Edina State: MN Site Number: Al P0606 View Description: Looking north at proposed location of 75' monopole tower from a viewpoint of about about 500' away. Page 2 of 2 ' R55CKREG _ iG20000 CITY L NA lb 9 7:48:07 Council Check Register Page - 1 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318439 1122/2009 118261 ''2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 208.50. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 203879 21- 018957 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 208.50 - 318440 112212009 100608 3M CO 464.21 LETTERING 00001592 203566 TP38078 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 464.21 318441 1/22/2009 118536, A & B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 441.78 REGULATOR 00001622 203567 52981 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN .441.78 318442 1122/2009 101833 A.T.O.M. 250.00 MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING 203568 15520309 1400.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 400.00 FTO BASIC CERTIFICATION 00003055 203569 ' 15448425 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 650.00 318443 1122/2009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 43.60 203710 0721772 5842.5515 COST. OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.56 203711 0721773 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 62.72 203842 0721752 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 124.88 318444 1/22/2009 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 95.85 #134 REPAIRS 203761 6323 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 165.05 #194 REPAIRS 203762 6318 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 260.90 318445 1/22/2009 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 31.10, ALARM SERVICE 203651 85750905 5111.6250 - ALARM SERVICE .- ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT - 31.10 318446 1/2212009 103160 AL'S VACUUM ' 125.93 VACUUM PARTS 00002138 203880 23496 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 125.93 318447 1/22/2009 101794 ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES LLC 825.00 IRRIGATION BLOWOUT - 203796 10018204 5431.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 825.00 318448 1/2212009 118171 AMERICAN PRESSURE INC. 163.54 MACHINE REPAIRS 00001564 203695 55847 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1/2112009 7:48:07 Page- 2 Business Unit GRILL GOLF DOME PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description 163.54 318449 1/2212009 101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 28.50 203553 101681311 -12/08 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 103.34 203554 100369500 -12108 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 284,07 203555 105905600 -12/08 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 382.05 203556 105219400 -12108 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 57.01 203557 103533424 -12/08 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 107.98 203558 103532024 -12108 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 204.31 203559 103531424 -12108 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 377.91 203560 100004611 -12108 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 1,545.17 318450 1/22/2009 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 189.98 2009 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203570 011209 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 189.98 318451 1122/2009 118491 APPLE COMPUTER INC. 531.44 MAC SOFTWARE 00004464 203531 9298385070 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,883.94 MAC EDITING STATION 00004464 203532 9298366728 2210.6711 NEW EQUIPMENT 5,415.38 318452 1122/2009 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS , 305.59 COFFEE 203623 411387 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 278.11 COFFEE 203797 411206 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 583.70 318453 1/22/2009 121985 ARROW HOCKEY AND SPORT CORP 1,117.80 HOCKEY SKATES 00002316 203571 0012266 -IN 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,117.80 318454 1/22/2009 103220 ASCAP 305.00 ASCAP MUSIC LICENSE 203624 100002780295 5621.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 305.00 318455 1/22/2009 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 33.85 HITCH PINS, COTTER PINS 00001510 203572 10050140 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 177.96 PLOW RAM 00006388 203798 10049397 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 46.39 BLADE GUIDES 00001567 203881 10050581 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 258.20 318456 1/22/2009 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 1/2112009 7:48:07 Page- 2 Business Unit GRILL GOLF DOME PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY - NA 1/. d 7:48:07 R55CKREG jG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 46.56 870517029 203533 870517029X1409 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 46.56 318457 1/22/2009 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 75.15 BATTERIES 00003063 203573 18- 229014 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 188.44 BATTERIES 00001496 203574 18- 228786 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 183.16 SCADA BATTERIES 00001603 203763 18- 229216 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 58.52 CAMERA BATTERIES 203764 18- 229333 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 505.27 318458 1/22/2009 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS 235.04 WASHER REPAIRS 203882 SO10005361 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 235.04 318459 1/2212009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 364.10 203658 47606900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 169.58 203659 81781600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 97.80 203843 47680300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4.32- 203844 81788300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 26.00 203845 81781500 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 336.08 203845 81781500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 989.24 318460 1122/2009 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 54.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203575 011309 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 54.95 318461 1122/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 17.55 CALENDARS 203576 WO- 541217 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 10.43 PLANNER 203577 WO- 541967 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 314.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203625 WO- 541897 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 42.94 CALENDARS 203626 WO- 542305 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 118.68 EXPANSION FILES 203627 OE- 182459 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 35.03 PENCILS 203628 OE- 182228 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 38.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203652 WO- 542050 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 82.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203799 OE- 177714 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 29.79 PLANNERS 203800 OE- 179562 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 59.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203801 WO- 533374 -1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 42.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203802 WO- 534672 -1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 42.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203803 WO- 537196 -1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 9.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009456 203804 OE- 181547 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 69.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009456 203805 OE- 181527 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Council Check Register Page - 4 1/2212009 - 1/2212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 237.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203806 OE- 182021 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 27.67 EXPANSION FILES 203883 OE- 183016 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 28.72 BUSINESS CARD BINDER 203883 OE- 183016 -1 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 1,207.17 318462 112212009 100666 BMI GENERAL LICENSING 1,034.00 MUSIC LICENSE 00008095 203578 6247110 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 274.50 BMI MUSIC LICENSE 203629 6260780 5631.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 1,308.50 318463 1/2212009 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 16,787.50 PROSECUTING 203807 39126 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 16,787.50 318464 1/22/2009 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,358.83 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003742 203885 87036630 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.05 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003743 203886 87036631 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 133.86 OXYGEN TANK & REGULATOR 00003743 203886 87036631 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.10 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00003742 203921 87036630 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 107.77 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00003742 203921 87036630 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1,689.61 318465 112212009 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 33.74 ALUMINUM 00001448 203579 261448 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.02 FITTING 00001453 203580 262163 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.52 OIL FILTERS 00001519 203884 263616 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.28 318466 112212009 114690 BRILL, DON 1,300.00 FIREWOOD 00002325 203765 011409 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,300.00 318467 1/22/2009 100671 BUDGET LIGHTING 281.48 BATTERIES, BULBS 00008092 203766 00438847 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 281.48 318468 112212009 123930 CACO SERVICES CO LLC 2,300.00 LIFT STATION #4 REPAIRS 00005004 203808 3946 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,300.00 318469 112212009 120541 CANNON RIVER WINERY - 156.00 203846 1941 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG :620000 CITY AA Council Check Register 1/2212009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 156.00 318470 1/2212009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,452.40 203660 14035 5842.5514 30.20 203661 14034 5842.5515 375.80 203712 14037 5822.5514 39.80 203713 14036 5822.5515 1,898.20 318471 1122/2009 123931 CARDINAL STRITCH.UNIVERSITY 2,220.00 TRAINING COURSE 203809 BS -PSM 9 -003 1470.6104 2,220.00 r ` 318472 112212009 101307 CAREER TRACK 195.00 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 203767 10841558 1400.6104 195.00 318473 1122/2009 100677 CARGILL INC. 7,451.03 DE -ICER 00005307 203581 2415748 1318.6525 7,451.03 _ 318474 112212009 111089. CARLSON, ERIC 104.48 RIFLE PROJECT, AR15 MOUNTS 203534 011209 1400.6551 - 104.48 318475 1/2212009 100681- CATCO 233.76 FITTINGS, COUPLERS, ELBOWS 00001635 203768 3 -65816 1553.6530 303.94- CREDIT 203769 1 -64633 1553.6530 387.61 MULTIFASTER KITS 00001629 203810 3 -65158 1553.6530 737.87 MULTIFASTERS 00005517 203811 3 -65155 1553.6530 1,055.30 318476 1/22/2009 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 227.91 203561 010509 5841.6186 262.19 203561 010509 5430.6186 283.48 203561 010509 5821.6186 429.55 203561 010509 5861.6186 436.79 203561 010509 5422.6186 704.29 203561 010509 1481.6186 1;584.76 203561 010509 5111.6186 1,692.22 203561 010509 5420.6186 1,710.65 203561 010509 5630.6186 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONFERENCES '& SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SALT AMMUNITION ' REPAIR PARTS' REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT. HEAT' HEAT HEAT 11. J 7:48:07 Page - 5 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CLUB HOUSE CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,867.39 1,875.12 2,638.23 4,017.44 5,155.41 318477 CITY OF EDINA 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1/22/2009 - 1/2212009 DEODORIZER 00008080 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 203561 010509 5911.6186 HEAT 203561 010509 1552.6186 HEAT 203561 010509 1628.6186 HEAT 203561 010509 5913.6186 HEAT 203561 010509 1646.6186 HEAT 203561 010509 5210.6186 HEAT 203561 010509 5511.6186 HEAT 318477 1122/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 192.23 DEODORIZER 00008080 203582 515037 5511.6511 192.23 318478 112212009 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 76.67 ELECTRICAL BILLING 00001346 203812 3990 5932.6185 76.67 318479 1/22/2009 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC , 14.51 WINDOW CLEANING 203922 435009 5861.6180 16.62 WINDOW CLEANING 203922 435009 5821.6180 25.99 WINDOW CLEANING 203922 435009 5841.6180 57.12 318480 1/22/2009 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 230.80 HEATER CORE 00005933 203535 122837 1553.6530 230.80 318481 1/22/2009 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 112.00 203662 0118081521 5822.5515 523.20 203714 0168071023 5842.5515 323.80 203847 0118081516 5862.5515 14.50- 203848 0118081517 5862.5515 . . CLEANING SUPPLIES LIGHT & POWER CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Page - 6 Business Unit WELL PUMPS CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF DOME PROGRAM ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 318482 112212009 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 354.00 COCOA 00002327 203770 0312461 -IN 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 354.00 318483 1122/2009 101345 COLOURS 4,413.63 BROCHURE DESIGN 203536 10015 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,413.63 CENTENNIAL LAKES COMMUNICATIONS CITY � NA 11. d 7:48:07 R55CKREG _jG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318484 1/22/2009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 30.00 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00001489 203583 03391066 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 185.11 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00001489 203583 03391066 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 185.11 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00001489 203583 03391066 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 185.11 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00001489 203583 03391066 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 185.12 GLOVES, LIP BALM 00001489 203583 03391066 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 32.94 SAFETY CAN, GLOVES 00001610 203696 03393807 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 110.36 SAFETY CAN, GLOVES 00001610 203696 03393807 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL $0.81 WALL CLOCK 00001624 203887 03395404 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 944.56 318485 1/22/2009 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 989.30 REPAIR COMPRESSOR 00008096 203772 27625 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 989.30 318486 1/2212009 120032 CORPORATE MECHANICAL 14,865.00 AV CONTROL ROOM AC 00004138 203537 127825 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 14,865.00 318487 1/22/2009 101616 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY 39.88 MEMORY UPGRADES 00004465 203584 243818852 1120.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION 68.70 MEMORY UPGRADES 00004465 203585 243849501 1120.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION 108.58 318488 1/22/2009 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 15.31 114 - 09855685 -4 203888 010109 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.31 318489 1/22/2009 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 493.00 THAW OUTSIDE DRAIN 00123108 203923 67038 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 493.00 - 318490 1/2212009 104020 DALCO 705.03 CAN LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00008083 203586 2056530 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 434.52 CAN LINERS 00008094 203587 2056964 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 285.42 PAINT REMOVER, DEGREASER 00001491 203588 2056524 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 709.29 ICE MELT 00001491 203588 2056524 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 472.92 WYPALL, CLEANER 00001506 203589 2056536 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 84.67 WYPALLS 00001506 203697 2057710 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 80.83 MOP RACK 00003766 203813 2047169 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 15.00 FILTER BAGS 00001606 203889 2058188 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 84.67 WYPALL 00001506 203890 2058085 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 795.41 VACUUM 4,792.50 FLOOR SCRUBBER 8,460.26 488845 318491 112212009 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 59.43 DAIRY 59.43 488843 318492 112212009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 598.00 203716 22.40 5822.5513 2,212.35 318493 1/2212009 121546 DICK, KENNA 900.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 900.00 318494 1/22/2009 100739 EAGLE WINE CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/22/2009 -- 1/22/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00001606 203891 2058186 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00003773 203924 2049575 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 203698 010509 5421.5510 203663 487689 5862.5514 203664 488846 5842.5515 203665 488845 5842.5514 203715 488844 5822.5514 203849 488843 5862.5514 203590 011309 1400.6104 443.89 VERNON SELLING 203666 168727 5822.5513 83.25 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 203667 171892 5842.5515 870.49 203668 171891 5842.5513 467.04 203716 171886 5822.5513 99.80 203717 171885 5822.5513 1,964.47 318495 112212009 123916 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 48.50 SWIM FEES - 1/11/09 203630 100002780295 1629.6406 48.50 318496 112212009 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,081.25 UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS 203538 338725 5910.6103 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITOR 2005A 203814 COPY337515 3201.6103 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITOR 2007C 203815 COPY337674 3301.6103 6,081.25 318497 1/22/2009 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 59.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203892 011609 1301.6201 59.98 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Page - 8 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAUNDRY ADAPTIVE RECREATION GENERAL (BILLING) CITY HALL DS REVENUES PIR DS REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY L AA 1l. ! 7:48:07 R55CKREG .G20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 1/22/2009 -- 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318498 1/22/2009 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 45.82 SHIPPING CHARGES 203773 9- 048 -20484 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 45.82 318499 1/22/2009 104474 FILTERFRESH 32.06 FILTERS 00001631 203631 13643240 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 32.06 318500 112212009 102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA 52.38 SYMPATHY FLOWERS 203816 4929 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 52.38 318501 112212009 100764 G & K SERVICES 10.64 203562 123108 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 176.24 203562 123108 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 256.01 203562 123108 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 468.78 203562 123108 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 715.05 203562 123108 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 974.70 203562 123108 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,601.42 318502 1/22/2009 118122 GEE TEEZ & COMPANY LTD 185.26 TWILL PATCHES 00009446 203817 120808 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 185.26 318503 1/22/2009 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 9.48 AUTO PARTS 203563 123108 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 179.62 AUTO PARTS 203563 123108 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 419.52 AUTO PARTS 203563 123108 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 608.62 318504 1/22/2009 101156 GOPHER SIGN CO. 639.00 BOARDS 00001304 203632 77788 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 639.00 318505 1/22/2009 101103 GRAINGER 109.70 DEGREASER 00001492 203591 9809338107 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.35 LOCK DE -ICER 00001492 203592 9809495204 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.68 FLASHLIGHTS, BATTERIES, TARPS 00001492 203593 9809495196 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 112.68 FLASHLIGHTS, BATTERIES, TARPS 00001492 203593 9809495196 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 112.68 FLASHLIGHTS, BATTERIES, TARPS 00001492 203593 9809495196 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.68 FLASHLIGHTS, BATTERIES, TARPS 00001492 203593 9809495196 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. CITY OF EDINA 104.32 WIRE, CABLE 00001586 203699 Council Check Register 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 124.26 1/2212009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 112.68 FLASHLIGHTS, BATTERIES, TARPS 00001492 203593 9809495196 5913.6406 169.72 HAND TOOLS 00001593 203594 9810592494 1301.6556 39.62 WINDOW, UNDERLAYMENT 00001595 203595 9811527424 1553.6530 88.28 TRIANGLE WARNING KITS 00001452 203596 9811527432 1553.6530 27.45 FILTERS 00001454 203633 9812795319 1553.6530 27.99 LIGHT BULBS 00002323 203634 9812576180 5630.6406 8.12 SOLVENT COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 203893 9811139584 7411.6406 33.13 DEGREASER 5822.5512 203894 9811139592 7411.6406 1,074.76 203721 171889 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Subledger Account Description Business Unit TOOLS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 318506 1/2212009 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 104.32 WIRE, CABLE 00001586 203699 938926089 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 124.26 WIRE, CABLE 00001586 203699 938926089 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 228.58 318507 112212009 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1,401.20 203669 171894 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 383.56- 203670 768768 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 7,098.95 203718 167373 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 9,443.17 203719 171895 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 163.13 203720 171890 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 368.85 203721 171889 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 56.02 203722 171887 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 170.96 203723 171896 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 80.77 203724 171881 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,720.92 203725 171884 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 3,381.05 203726 167367 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 46.57- 203727 768769 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 153.32- 203850 769180 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 25,301.57 318508 1/22/2009 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 421.40 BLOWER KIT 00001590 203700 BLM0118452 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS 421.40 318509 1/2212009 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 178.76 REGISTER PAPER 00007516 203895 263004 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 178.76 1121/2009 7:48:07 Page - 10 GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PARKING RAMP STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON SELLING 318510 112212009 101387 HAPPY FACES 150.00 BEACH PARTY 216/09 203896 011609 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 R55CKREG _ ,jG20000 CITY t- AA % d 7:48:07 Council Check Register Page - 11 1/22/2009 — 1122/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318511 1122/2009 101255 HASLER INC. 95.85 POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 203818 10709439 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 95.85 318512 1122/2009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,390.85 TONKAZORB 00005755 203597 1264584 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,029.15 CHEMICALS 00005755 203701 1265015 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5,420.00 318513 1122/2009 102154 HCMC EMS EDUCATION 576.00 TUITION 203635 011409 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 576.00 318514 1122/2009 102154 HCMC EMS EDUCATION 1,180.00 EMT BASIC TRAINING 203774 011409 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,180.00 318515 1/2212009 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 319.50 PIZZA 203819 1500917 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 319.50 318516 1/22/2009 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 189.00 SILS /CAL SUPPORT 203775 28127674 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 56.00 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 203820 28127673 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,441.14 RADIO ADMIN FEE 203898 28128622 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,686.14 318517 1122/2009 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 646.84 DEC2008 BOOKING FEES 203821 2304 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 646.84 318518 112212009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 541.30 203671 474368 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 645.75 203672 474969 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 148.20 203728 474921 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,335.25 318519 1/22/2009 100810 HRA/CITY OF EDINA 50,000.00 TO FUND HRA 203897 011609 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 50,000.00 CITY OF EDINA 1/21/2009 7:48:07 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318520 1/22/2009 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 149.58 PHONE LISTING 203899 390014262471 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 149.58 PHONE LISTING 203899 390014262471 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 149.59 PHONE LISTING 203899 390014262471 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 448.75 318521 112212009 114391 INDUSTRIAL LUMBER & PLYWOOD IN 167.03 KIOSK SUPPLIES 203777 558631 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 167.03 318522 1/2212009 105198 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. FOR PROPE 150.00 203771 011509 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 318523 1/22/2009 112558 ISAAMAN, TREVOR 308.07 MATERIALS FOR SCOREBOARD 203702 011409 5420.6577 LUMBER CLUB HOUSE 308.07 318524 1/22/2009 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 63.68 CAMERA BAGS 203900 011309 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 63.68 318525 1/22/2009 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 9.62 203539 123108 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 12.05 203539 123108 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 14.06 203539 123108 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.06 203539 123108 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 103.40 203539 123108 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 179.19 318526 1122/2009 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 1.70 203564 123108 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 10.19 203564 123108 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 16.42 203564 123108 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 37.92 203564 123108 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.33 203564 123108 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 40.60 203564 123108 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 42.43 203564 123108 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 45.70 203564 123108 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 47.09 203564 123108 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 54.42 203564 123108 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.44 203564 123108 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY AA U. J 7:48:07 R55CKREG G20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/2212009 'IM/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.52 203564 123108 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.84 203564 123108 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 104.93 203564 123108 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 176.46 203564, 123108 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 192.40 203564 123108 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 231.55 203564 123108 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 582.28 203564 123108 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 797.58 203564 123108 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,639.80 318527 1122/2009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 6;350.75 203729 1243005 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 37.20 203730 1243006 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 61.60 203731 1232395 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,612.96 203732 1232396 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,243.48 203851 1232394 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 13,305.99 318529 112212009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 239.60 203673 1561523 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,863.35 203674 1559981 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.24 203675 1561050 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 212.47 203733 :1568608 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 106.14 203734 1568613 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,268.32 203735 '1568623 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,605.12 203736 1568617 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 203737 1568615 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .28 203738 1568614 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,228.77 203739 1568630 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 173.88 203740 1568629 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 35.37 203741 1568628 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,214.97 203852 1568626 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 988.11 203853 1568611 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 348.83 203854 1568609 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .50TH ST SELLING 812.90 203855 1568612 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 603.96 203856 1568610 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,500.32 203857 1568622 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 888.21 203858 1566616 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 72.22 203859 1568619 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,263.87 203860 1568618 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,261.24 203861 1568621 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 28,691.29 ., CITY OF EDINA 1/21/2009 7:48:07 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 14 1/22/2009 - 1/2212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318530 1122/2009 100357 JOHNSON, DAN 45.97 2009 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203636 011309 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.97 318531 1122/2009 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 88.71 PETTY CASH 203653 011309 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 399.23 PETTY CASH 203653 011309 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 487.94 318532 112212009 105990 KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION INC. 124.80 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 203822 55311 01345.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -345 WOODLAND CIR 124.80 318533 1122/2009 101817 KLEINBERG, ERIC 256.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203778 011509 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 256.00 318534 112212009 102047 KLITZKE, PAUL 120.00 PIANO TUNING 00006179 203598 20095 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 120.00 318535 1/2212009 120511 KUSKE, BRANDON 2,000.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 203779 011509 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,000.00 318536 1122/2009 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 202.00 PLUMBING REPAIRS 00001627 203599 4822 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 202.00 318537 1122/2009 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 298.13 LOGO CLOTHING 203703 07217174 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 298.13 318538 1122/2009 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 452.12 CUTTING EDGE, STANDS 00002315 203637 192001 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 452.12 318539 1/2212009 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 156.24 HOSE 00001625 203600 7633382 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 159.54 NUTS & BOLTS LOOSENER 00001490 203601 7633383 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.81 CHISELS, CAULK GUNS, LEVEL 00001607 203704 7650901 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG aG20000 203676 CITY k JA 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 203677 318541 112212009 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 268.29 CLAMPS, PINS, PLOW BOLTS 00001608 203705 7650900 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 555.86 NUTS, BOLTS 00001614 203901 7655951 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,245.74 203680 40.00 5842.5514 318540 1/22/2009 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 30.40 203681 1/, J 7:48:07 Page - 15 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 285.00 LMC CONFERENCE 203638 125375 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK 50TH ST SELLING PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 2,113.60 203676 285.00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,783.60 203677 318541 112212009 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 60.00 203678 420510 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 40.00 REDUCING ENERGY COST BOOK 203823 125259 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,602.05 203680 40.00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 30.40 203681 318542 112212009 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 874.50 203862 422366 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 89.70 COPIER USAGE 00001512 203902 149120 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.70 318543 1/22/2009 101792 LUBE -TECH 454.68 OIL 00006385 203824 1609884 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 144.05 WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID 00001560 203903 1616386 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 598.73 318544 1/22/2009 100863 M & S ROOFING INC. 1,130.00 ROOF FLASHING REPAIR 203825 8056 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,130.00 318545 1/2212009 101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC. 36.00 WINE SPECTATOR 203540 141250 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 36.00 318546 1122/2009 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 138.78 TOWELS, SOAP 203826 W21410 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 471.84 JANITORIAL SERVICE - JAN 2009 203904 C003133 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 610.62 318547 1/22/2009 100868 MARK VII SALES ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK 50TH ST SELLING PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 2,113.60 203676 420683 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,783.60 203677 420509 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 60.00 203678 420510 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,386.26 203679 420324 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 2,602.05 203680 421117 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 30.40 203681 421118 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 874.50 203862 422366 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/2212009 — 1/2212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9,850.41 318548 1/2212009 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 225.00 HOSTING FEE 203602 129 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Page - 16 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 225.00 318549 1/22/2009 103944 MED COMPASS 3,260.00 ANNUAL MEDICAL EXAMS 203827 13574 1470.6175 3,260.00 318550 112212009 103232 MEHA 90.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES (3) 203654 010109 1490.6105 90.00 318551 112212009- 101483 MENARDS 28.86 BRUSHES, SANDING SPONGES 00001597 203603 6058 1301.6556 11.70- RETURN 203604 6057 1301.6556 193.65 LUMBER, SCREWS, BITS 00001255 203780 6560 1646.6406 98.26 KIOSK SUPPLIES 00001597 203781 6364 44005.6710 309.07 318552 1122/2009 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 1,454.90 SOFTBALLS 203706 112689 4077.6406 1,454.90 318553 112212009 101625 METRO FIRE CHIEFS OFFICERS ASS 400.00 DUES 203905 011309 1470.6105 400.00 318554 112212009 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 106.00 OFFICIATING FEES 203605 3476 4077.6103 53.00 OFFICIATING FEES 203906 3484 4077.6103 159.00 318555 112212009 122304 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 4,240.13 DIAL -A -RIDE NOV 2008 203828 0000889521 1514.6103 4,240.13 318556 1/22/2009 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,980.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001344 203639 33331 5913.6180 1,980.00 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Page - 16 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG _.)G20000 CITY . AA Council Check Register 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 318557 1122/2009 101320 - MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 96.00 MLS ACCESS FEES 203640 1533457 1190.6105 96.00 318558 1/22/2009 105237 MINNESOTA AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM 50.00 2009 DUES 203908 011309 1470.6105 50.00 318559 1/2212009 101589 MINNESOTA GFOA 180.00 MEMBERSHIP 'DUES, (3). 203655 010109 1160.6105 180.00 318560 1/22/2009 1181414 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 19700 NEWSPAPER AD INSERTS 203829 57960 5822.6122 197.00 NEWSPAPER AD INSERTS 203829 57960 5842.6122 197.00 NEWSPAPER AD INSERTS 203829 57960 5862.6122 591.00 318561 1/22/2009 101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND 15,756.78 4TH QTR 2008. 203565 5045232 1550.6046 15,756.78 318562 112212009 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 24.35 CAMLOCKS 00001456 203641 0078711 -IN 1553.6530 24.35 318563 1/22/2009 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 264.12 ENVELOPES 00003792 203907 5360 1470.6406 ' 264.12 318564 1/2212009 101608 MSSA 35.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 203607 011409 5919.6106 175.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 203608 011209 1281.6104 .210.00 318565 112212009 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 50.77 BEDKNIFE SCREWS, 00006389 203909 649583 -01 5422.6530 2,157.65 BEARINGS,'SEALS 00006387 203910 649044 -00 5422.6530 1,073.86 BEDKNIVES; FILTERS 00006389 203911 649583 -00 5422.6530 ' 3,282.28 318566 1/22/2009 101575 MUNICIPALS Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE CONFERENCES &.SCHOOLS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS it. J 7:48:07 Page - 17 Business Unit ASSESSING FIRE DEPT. 'GEINERAL FINANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAINING TRAINING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Council Check Register Page - 18 1122/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 203782 2009 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 25.00 318567 1/22/2009 117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. 14,795.59 SALT 00005306 203642 70303025 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 9,953.92 SALT 00005306 203830 70300054 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 8,860.26 SALT '00005306 203831 70301158 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 33,609.77 318568 1/2212009 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 334.51 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003744 203912 P232074801021 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 334.51 318569 1122/2009 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 612.22 CB REPAIR PARTS 00001343 203609 S01182473.001 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 612.22 318570 1/22/2009 120166 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA 50.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 203783 2133950 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE 50.00 318571 1122/2009 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 10.17 GLUE STICKS 00009448 203656 36811101 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 10.17 318572 1/22/2009 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 203832 3014 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 203832 3014 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 85.00 SECRET SHOPPING 203832 3014 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 255.00 318573 1/22/2009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 105.42 CHAIR 00002313 203610 458245246-001 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 133.24 LETTER PRINTING 203833 457894275-001 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 238.66 318574 1/2212009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 860.25 203682 8209592 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 743.65 203742 8210280 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,160.83 203743 8210276 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,764.73 CITY k NA 1i. J 7:48:07 R55CKREG 620000 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/22/2009 - 112212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318575 1122/2009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 295.16 203683 2704239 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.24 203684 2700657 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 49.12 203744 2706436 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,067.62 203745 2706443 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 41.12 203746 2706444 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 447.98 203863 2706433 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,384.09 203864 2706431 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 41.12 203865 2706439 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 56.12 203866 2706432 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,059.66 203867 2706437 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,313.51 203868 2706438 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,599.32 203869 2706435 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10,357.06 318576 1/22/2009 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 387.30 203685 171893 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 246.20 203747 171888 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 633.50 318577 1/22/2009 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES 308.45 WASHERS, NUTS, CABLE TIES 00001615 203611 80826 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 308.45 318578 1122/2009 111600 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER INC. 245.88 BATTERIES 203784 17025811N 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 245.88 318579 1/22/2009 100971 QUALITY WINE 3,695.83 203686 109142 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 835.54 203687 108564 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,669.33 203688 109402 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 866.20 203748 109396 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,798.30 203749 109403 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 51.60 203750 109127 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 434.90 203751 108556 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 464.00- 203752 107436 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 292.80 203870 110691 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 150.00- 203871 104048 -00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 516.00- 203872 107435 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 9,514.50 CITY OF EDINA 1/21/2009 7:48:07 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 20 1/22/2009 - 1/2212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318580 1/2212009 123898 QWEST 132.96 952 285 -2951 203643 2951 -1/09 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 132.96 318581 1/22/2009 100149 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES 20.51 HEADLIGHT 00006251 203913 038587009 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20.51 318582 112212009 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 112.50 SAFETY BOOTS 203622 725932 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 135.96 SAFETY BOOTS 203622 725932 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 288.92 SAFETY BOOTS 203622 725932 5630.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 603.34 SAFETY BOOTS 203622 725932 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 603.38 SAFETY BOOTS 203622 725932 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,402.05 SAFETY BOOTS 203622 725932 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 127.46 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 203634 725 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 161.46 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 203834 725 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,435.07 318583 1/22/2009 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 67.00 HITCH PIN LOCKS 00001497 203612 1002569 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.00 318584 1/2212009 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 1,491.00 TREE TRIMMING 203914 26953 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,491.00 318585 1/22/2009 100987 SA -AG INC 131.92 SAND 00001489 203915 60971 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 131.92 318586 1/2212009 117807 SAM'S CLUB 49.17 ICE PELLETS 203835 000790 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 49.17 318587 1/22/2009 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 473.88 QUARTERLY CONTRACT 203644 8102249831 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 473.88 318588 1/22/2009 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 449.31 MK- LXT406 COMBO, GLUE 00001247 203836 132942 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 449.31 R55CKREG _-jG20000 CITY L AA 1/. J 7:48:07 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/22/2009 — 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318589 1/22/2009 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 785.82 SPRINKLER REPAIRS 203837 64166172 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 785.82 318590 1/2212009 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 3,680.00 1ST QTR DUES 203645 8159 1470.6221 RANGE RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,081.00 1ST QTR DUES 203645 8159 1400.6221 RANGE RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8,761.00 318591 1/22/2009 123693 SOUTHDALE MEDICAL ARTS 2,461.55 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 203646 011309 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 2,461.55 318592 1/2212009 101004 SPS COMPANIES 107.40 BALL VALVES, SEALANT 00001252 203785 S1975855.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 107.40 318593 112212009 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 196.15 TIRE GAUGE, LAMPS 00005410 203916 SI69533 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 196.15 318594 1/22/2009 123934 STOCKMAN TRANSFER INC. 2,936.75 WOOD WASTE GRINDING 00001466 203925 IVC0046688 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 14,937.00 HAULING LEAVES 00001466 203926 IVC0046689 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 17,873.75 318595 1/22/2009 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 433.46 CUTTING EDGE KIT, EDGES 00001628 203613 12302 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 433.46 318596 1/2212009 117657 STORE TO DOOR 6,160.00 CITY GRANT 203614 01092009 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 6,160.00 318597 112212009 101015 STRETCHERS 122.40 SNAP CLIPS 203786 1585892 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.94 LAMP 203787 1585947 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 34.07- 203788 CM230690 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 34.07 203789 1581771 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 154.34 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Page- 22 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DEER CONTROL 1,220.00 203689 JM6901 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER R55CKREG LOG20000 1,220.00 318603 1/2212009 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. Council Check Register 529.84 1/2212009 - 1/22/2009 5105810 -IN Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318598 112212009 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY - 64.36 MODULE 00001515 203615 149336CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 64.36 1,571.80 203874 525466 318599 1/22/2009 VERNON SELLING 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 1,586.05 75.08 PUBLISH BID FOR AMBULANCE 203647 1154332 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 53.63 PUBLISH HEARINGS NOTICE 203648 1154333 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 128.71 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203792 2009 -27399 318600 112212009 YORK SELLING 103972 SUPERCIRCUITS INC. 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203792 2009 -27399 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 4,505.73 SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEM 00003038 203790 577901A 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 4,505.73 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203793 2009 -27410 318601 1/2212009 YORK.SELLING 114800 SUPERIOR WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203793 2009 -27410 5862.6122 1,000.00 DEER REMOVAL 00005989 203791 109 1509.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000.00 318606 1/2212009 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 318602 1/22/2009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 196.84 MULTI - PURPOSE CART 00001174 203617 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Page- 22 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DEER CONTROL 1,220.00 203689 JM6901 5842.5514, COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,220.00 318603 1/2212009 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 529.84 ICE MELT 00001253 203616 5105810 -IN 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 529.84 318604 1122/2009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY - 14.25 203873 525467 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,571.80 203874 525466 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,586.05 318605 112212009 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203792 2009 -27399 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203792 2009 -27399 5842.6122 • ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203792 2009 -27399 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203793 2009 -27410 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203793 2009 -27410 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK.SELLING 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 203793 2009 -27410 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,050.00 318606 1/2212009 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 196.84 MULTI - PURPOSE CART 00001174 203617 250152 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 196.84 CITY,. .JA 11. J 7:48:07 R55CKREG .G20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 1/22/2009 -1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318607 1/22/2009 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 219.00 203690 215000 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 65.00 203753 214999 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 187.00 203875 214998 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 471.00 318608 1/2212009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 2,048.51 FLAGSTICKS, TEE TOWELS 00006241 203917 S116801 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,048.51 318609 1/22/2009 100363 U.S. BANK 350.56 CHAIN SAW 203838 011509 1470.6556 TOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 474.91 SUPPLIES 203838 011509 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,154.34 TRAINING/MEETING SUPPLIES 203838 011509 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,979.81 318610 1/22/2009 115379 U.S. BANK 256.20 CONFERENCE LODGING 203544 JAN052009 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 256.20 318611 112212009 122321 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC. 785.00 REPAIRS 203657 33256 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 785.00 318612 112212009 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 328.37 PAGERS 203618 S0319246A 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 328.37 318613 112212009 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 4,502.99 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001342 203541 14120 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,080.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001342 203542 14111 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,031.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001341 203543 14110 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 11,614.97 318614 112212009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 374.38 LIQUOR BAGS 203619 108071 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 374.50 CAN LINERS, SOAP 203707 108073 -00 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 795.64 TISSUE, CUPS, LIDS 203707 108073 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 136.17 CAN LINERS, PLASTICWARE 00007513 203918 108070 -00 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 681.82 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 203918 108070 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 2,362.51 CITY OF EDINA 1/21/2009 7:48:07 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/22/2009 - 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318615 1/22/2009 103252 VEAP 20,360.00 2009 FUNDING 203708 011309 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 20,360.00 318616 112212009 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 91.50 203754 12493 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 91.50 318617 1/2212009 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 420.47 FOOD 00002328 203794 24709947 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 420.47 318618 1/22/2009 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 141.09 LIGHTING 00001618 203620 15119748 -00 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 278.90 LIGHTING 00001618 203620 15119748 -00 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 435.00 LIGHTING 00001618 203620 15119748 -00 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 854.99 318619 1/22/2009 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 787.00 LEAK LOCATING 00001345 203839 1048 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 787.00 318620 1/2212009 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 180.00 GAS TANK REPAIRS. 00001626 203621 0038691 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 180.00 318621 1122/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 497.75 203691 209546 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 716.10 203755 209942 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 435.15 203756 209943 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.00- 203876 209569 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.00- 203877 210000 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192.00- 203878 210001 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,417.00 318622 1/22/2009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 64.00 203692 259164 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 320.00 203693 259165 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 755.53 203757 259862 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,254.56 203758 259863 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,111.62 203759 259865 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG G20000 CITY NA L: ;9 7:48:07 _- Council Check Register Page - 25 1/22/2009 -- 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier,/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,505.71 318623 1122/2009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,478.05 203694 223265 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 851.55 203760 223264 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,329.60 318624 1/2212009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 18.16 51- 4151897 -6 203545 180298925 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,863.96 51- 6621207 -1 203546 180341167 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 36.47 51- 7567037 -0 203547 180356720 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 5,001.32 51- 5619094 -8 203548 180655179 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 6,385.37 51- 5888961 -7 203549 180661209 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER, PARKING RAMP, 359.06 51- 4197645 -8 203550. 180628474 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 670.08 51- 9013604 -6 203552 180552665 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 17,598.59 51- 5605640 -1 203840 181200530 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 3,202.71 51- 6227619 -3 203841 181392840 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 37,135.72 318625 1122/2009 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 401.16 COPIER USAGE- BLDG /ENG 00004322 203551 037880642 1550.6151 EQUIPMENTRENTAIL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - 401.16 318626 ., 1/22/2009 123919 YOUNG, BETTY 84.76 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 203795 011609 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES.. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.76, 318627 1/22/2009 122316 ZACK'S INC. 45.25 SHOVELS, SCOOPS,; SQUEEGEES 00001599 203709 24672 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION r 64.10 SHOVELS, SCOOPS; SQUEEGEES 00001599 203709 24672 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 235.27 SHOVELS, SCOOPS, SQUEEGEES 00001599 203709 24672 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 344.62 318628 1/22/2009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 9.21 CLIP 00001457 203650 PCO01120871 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 341.90 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE` 203919 E6076405 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.62 CONNECTOR, COUPLING 00006394 203920 PC100084090 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 410.73 318629 1/22/2009 102500 ZIMMERMAN, TIM 314.91 2009 UNIFORM PURCHASE 203649 011309 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 314.91 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/21/2009 7:48:07 Council Check Register Page - 26 1/22/2009 — 1/22/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 538,102.75 Grand Total PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 538,102.75 Total Payments 538,102.75 Business Unit R55CKSUM ,10000 CITY � AA 11. j 7:49:40 Council Check Summary Page - 1 1/22/2009 - 1/2212009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 271,649.93 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 10,352.14 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 2,000.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 7,626.94 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,208.57 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 10,793.36 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 79.10 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 13,029.39 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 15,008.95 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 12,571.34 05800 LIQUOR FUND 132,398.91 05900 UTILITY FUND 56,591.10 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 76.67 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 716.35 Report Totals 538,102.75 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pup d Procedures d _ _ R55CKREG LOG20000 51.60 CITY OF —_.,JA 204234 0721774 5862.5515 Council Check Register 204235 0721785 5842.5515 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 104.72 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318630 1122/2009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 70.64 500.00 UTILITY BILLING PERMIT #939 204034 012209 5910.6235 POSTAGE 500.00 318631 1/29/2009 1/2912009 100609 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIA 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 520.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 203981 7 -286 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 204333 126818 520.00 179.50 318632 .1/29/2009 100613 AAA 318636 1/29/2009 103357. ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 57.00 VEHICLE TABS RENEWAL 204332 012309 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 1,861.62 57.00 204334 AAAQ5567 2210.6103 318633 1/29/2009 1,861.62 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 1/2b,_ 8:22:25 Page- 1 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) 50TH STREET GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION r GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51.60 204234 0721774 5862.5515 53.12 204235 0721785 5842.5515 104.72 318634 1/29/2009 102872 ADAMS GOLF 70.64 GOLF CLUB 204144 91102581 5440.5511 70.64 318635 1/2912009 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 179.50 COFFEE 204333 126818 1628.6406 179.50 318636 1/29/2009 103357. ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 1,861.62 CASTNET SUPPORT/MAINTENANCE 204334 AAAQ5567 2210.6103 1,861.62 318637 1/29/2009 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 649.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204035 012109 5110.6103 649.00 318638 1129/2009 100665 AMSAN 143.54 SPONGES, LIQUID SPOTTER 00001266 203928 193945847 1646.6406 143.54 318639 112912009 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 2,000.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 204182 012109 1400.6104 2,000.00 318640 112912009 102116 ANCHOR PRINTING CO. 1/2b,_ 8:22:25 Page- 1 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) 50TH STREET GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION r GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 2 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275.15 PRESENTERS GUIDE 203929 22680 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 275.15 318641 1/29/2009 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 189.69 ICE MELT, GRILL CLEANER 204335 1088741 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 582.55 FOOD 204335 1088741 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 772.24 318642 1/29/2009 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 144.00 COFFEE 204336 411357 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 144.00 318643 1/29/2009 123950 ARROWHEAD EMS ASSOCIATION 225.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 00003061 204183 8448 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 318644 1/29/2009 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 40.27 204337 010109 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 47.88 204337 010109 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 65.77 204337 010109 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 89.31 204337, 010109 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 98.37 204337 010109 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 105.71 204337 010109 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 106.12 204337 010109 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 232.65 204337 010109 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 241.33 204337 010109 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 243.26 204337 010109 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 271.83 204337 010109 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 271.84 204337 010109 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 294.60 204337 010109 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 448.35 204337 010109 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 566.77 204337 010109 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,124.06 318645 1129/2009 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 112.32 BUSINESS CARDS 204184 454 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 177.74 BUSINESS CARDS 204185 453 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 290.06 318646 1/29/2009 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 85.16 BATTERIES 00004467 203930 18- 229779 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 85.16 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF , A 11281 -_ _ _ 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 3 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318647 1/29/2009 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 90.53 SPREADER CLOTH 00002332 204061 00072206 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 90.53 318648 1/29/2009 122593 BELDE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,009.49 JANITORIAL SERVICES - JAN 2009 204186 954 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,009.49 318649 1/29/2009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 184.60 203955 81807400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,010.82 203956 47606800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 187.68 203957 81807500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 394.10 203958 47651300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 178.19 204236 81807600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,746.50 204237 47577700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,055.65 204238 47665500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,429.74 204239 47680400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 128.00 204240 47690800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 160.00- 204241 45608800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,155.28 318650 1/29/2009 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204036 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 147.55 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204095 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 447.55 318651 1/29/2009 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 40.59 UNIFORM PURCHASE 204187 012009 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.59 318652 1/2912009 123090 BERCAW, SCOTT 157.13 PERMIT REFUND 204189 ED089770 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 157.13 318653 1/29/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 35.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203997 WO- 543531 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 87.99 SPACE HEATERS 203998 WO- 543165 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 202.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009456 204062 OE- 182733 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 215.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003067 204188 WO- 543645 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 540.68 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318654 1/29/2009 123328 BESEMAN, CARLY 72.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204126 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 72.00 318655 112912009 117013 BILL'S HOME REPAIR & REMODELIN 19,900.00 FLOORING, WINDOWS, PATIO DOOR 204367 012609 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19,900.00 318656 1/29/2009 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 160.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204037 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160.00 318657 1/29/2009 123951 BOLGER INC 45.00 DESIGN SEMINAR 204190 012309 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 45.00 318658 1/2912009 122942 BORNOWSKI, CLAY 336.00 MAINTENANCE 204054 012109 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 248.00 MAINTENANCE 204133 12109 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 584.00 318659 1/29/2009 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 35.68 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003742 204191 87038279 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 35.68 318660 1/29/2009 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 436.39 PUMP, GASKETS, FILTER 00001465 204063 264388 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 225.26 LINK ASSEMBLY 00001467 204064 265104 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 134.49 FRAME ASSEMBLY 00001466 204065 265366X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 19.72 SWITCH 00001666 204066 266422 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 121.09 SENDER, WIRING 00001462 204067 264233 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 936.95 318661 1/29/2009 101752 BRISCOE, ROBERT 39.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204096 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 39.00 318662 '1129/2009 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 35.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204097 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 35.75 318663 1129191"1 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Page - 4 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMM DEV BLK GRANT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF _ - -tA 1/28 __ _s 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 5 1/2212009 -- 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 69.29 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204099 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 69.29 318664 112912009 120943 BUECHEL, RUTH 39.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204098 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 318665 1/2912009 123944 BURGE, ROBERT 8.00 CLASS REFUND 204338 012109 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 8.00 318666 1/29/2009 123930 CACO SERVICES CO LLC 2,300.00 INSTALL PLC LIFT STATION #4 00001405 204372 3945 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,300.00 318667 1/29/2009 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 59.07 FRAMING 204192 012309 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 59.07 318668 1129/2009 100391 CALL ONE INC. 519.85 ADAPTER SYSTEM FOR DISPATCH 00003059 204193 996973 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 519.85 318669 1129/2009 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 136.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 204038 012109 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 209.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204038 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 345.00 318670 1/29/2009 108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 4,890.00 CABLE ADS 204145 081226 -2 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 9,587.70 CABLE ADS 204146 09112 -1 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 14,477.70 318671 1/29/2009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,285.65 203959 14114 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 52.15 203960 14113 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 332.70 204242 14112 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 39.80 204243 14111 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,710.30 318672 1/29/2009 100677 CARGILL INC. 1,953.64 SALT 00005306 204194 2436122 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL r R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 6 1/22/2009 — 1129/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,953.64 318673 1/29/2009 112811 CASTREJON INC. 77,706.45 FIBER PROJECT 204195 10846 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING 77,706.45 318674 1/2912009 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 284.00 204244 80871 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 284.00 318675 1/29/2009 100681 CATCO 239.10 COUPLER 00001637 203931 1 -65767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 239.10 318676 1/2912009 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 290.44 5596524 -8 204150 011609 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 290.44 318677 1/2912009 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 37.28 204147 1741252 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 13,779.32 204148 1741242 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 10,576.67 204149 1741222 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 24,393.27 318678 1/29/2009 123940 CHACKO, CHRIS 296.00 PT MAINTENANCE 204127 012109 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 296.00 318679 1/29/2009 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 514.18 BOOKLET ENVELOPES 203932 22295 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 431.17 ENVELOPES 204339 22308 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 945.35 318680 1/29/2009 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 317.45 203961 382830 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 317.45 318681 1/2912009 104363 CHOICEPOINT INC. 240.00 AUTOTRACK SERVICES - DEC 2008 204151 AB0001921093 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 318682 112919' - - 122034 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES R55CKREG LOG20000 3,768.38 CITY OF _ -A 318683 112912009 105693 CITYSPRINT Council Check Register 18.25 COURIER 204152 1/2212009 - 1/29/2009 152.30 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,072.81 00103426 - 0203502003 204373 0203502003 -1/09 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER 413.79 00103426 - 0203158000 204374 0203158000 -1/09 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER 1,097.28 00103426 -0203158108 204375 0203158108 -1/09 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER 25.99 00103426- 0203502012 204376 0203502012 -1/09 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER 531.55 00082050- 0200650009 204377 0200650009 -1/09 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER 265.46 00104391 -0200650018 204378 0200650018 -1/09 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER 235.30 00101025- 0203600013 204379 0203600013 -1/09 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER 60.23 00101025 - 0203610011 204380 0203610011 -1/09 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER 65.97 00082198 - 0200815001 204381 0200815001 -1/09 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER 1/281-,, 8:22:25 Page - 7 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,768.38 318683 112912009 105693 CITYSPRINT 18.25 COURIER 204152 13607 152.30 COURIER 204152 13607 170.55 318684 1/2912009 105316 CLARK, PENNY 56.55 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204100 012209 56.55 318685 1/2912009 123941 CLAY, CAROL 117.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204128 012109 117.00 318686 1/2912009 116304 CLAY, DON 231.25 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 204055 012109 140.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 204134 12109 371.25 318687 1/2912009 123943 COLDWELL BANKER 74.22 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 204340 305646003 74.22 318688 1/2912009 105491 COLLEGE OF ST. CATHERINE 265.00 LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE 2009 204196 15734451 265.00 318689 1/29/2009 105428 CUSTOM DOOR SALES INC. 215.00 REPLACE GLASS IN DOOR 204197 0023093 -IN 215.00 318690 112912009 104020 DALCO 1/281-,, 8:22:25 Page - 7 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 8 1/27/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 102.67 SOAP 00008083 204068 2059758 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 62.84 CLEANER 00008099 204069 2058081 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 165.51 318691 1/2912009 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 136.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204101 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 136.50 318692 1/29/2009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,251.45 203962 489685 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 104.00 203963 489597 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,949.35 204245 489682 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 66.30 204246 489683 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 751.90 204247 489684 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 240.00 204248 489596 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,363.00 318693 1129/2009 118351 DEANOVIC, ELIZABETH 44.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204102 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 44.20 318694 1/29/2009 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 271.00 THERMOMETERS, TESTER KIT 00001516 203933 350649 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.54 SOCKETS 00001516 203934 350654 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.88 HAND TOOLS 00001507 204153 348114 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 450.42 318695 1/2912009 102831 DEX EAST 18.00 110350670 204341 011609 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 18.00 318696 1/29/2009 101986 DIBBLE, DON 73.16 UNIFORM PURCHASE 204342 012609 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 73.16 318697 1/29/2009 123952 DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS.NET 254.00 LAPTOP MOUNT 00003068 204198 406650 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 254.00 318698 1129/2009 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 230.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204103 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 230.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF —NA 1/28&—d 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 9 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318699 1/29/2009 120696 DRAPER, LAURENE 961.72 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 204199 012109 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 961.72 318700 1129/2009 100735 E-Z SHARP INC 433.80 SKATE SHARPENING SUPPLIES 00008091 204070 12867 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 433.80 318701 1/2912009 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,025.68 203964 171880 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 610.50 204249 174918 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,352.24 204250 174929 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 545.43 204251 174923 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,533.85 318702 1/29/2009 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 313.11 VINYL GUARD RAKES 00006391 204343 0085972 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 313.11 318703 1/29/2009 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 221.52 DEC WASHES 204154 3675 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 221.52 318704 112912009 100851 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC 21,869.01 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 204368 013009 05480.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 21,869.01 318705 1/29/2009 102101 FEDEX KINKO'S INC. 197.77 PRINTING FOR PUBLIC ART 204155 062200014159 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 197.77 318706 1/29/2009 119971 FELSEN, GREGG 48.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204104 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 318707 1/29/2009 118715 FESLER, RICHARD 72.19 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 204039 012109 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 72.19 318708 112912009 105420 FIKES SERVICES 39.41 AIR DEODORIZERS 204344 49744 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1128/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 10 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 39.41 318709 112912009 106115 FISHMAN, SANDRA 68.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204105 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 68.25 318710 1/2912009 106192 FLAMING RIVER INDUSTRIES INC. 540.84 SWITCH WITH LOCK -OUT 00001511 204156 133783 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 540.84 318711 1/29/2009 112870 FLEISCHMANN, LESLIE 26.97 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204106 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.97 - 318712 1/2912009 104205 FLICKER, KEVIN 32.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204107 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.50 318713 1/29/2009 103985 FLOR, JON 150.00 AD DESIGN 204345 2127 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 318714 1129/2009 103207 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC. 393.99 EXTENSION POLES 00001623 203999 702123 -00 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 393.99 318715 1/2912009 120733 FRAHM, JEFF 62.60 REIMBURSEMENT 204071 012209 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 319.00 REIMBURSEMENT 204071 012209 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 381.60 318716 112912009 105158 FRANKLIN, ELIZABETH 40.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204040 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 40.00 318717 1129/2009 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 3,798.20 INSTRUCTOR AC 204041 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3,798.20 318718 1/29/2009 118896 FRYKMAN, LAURA 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204042 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 300.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 ART WORK SOLD 120.00 5101.4413 CITY OF -.4A ART CENTER REVENUES 318721 :1129/2009 COLLECTION SYSTEMS 123945 GOETZ; AMY Council Check Register COMMUNICATIONS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 84.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC .. 1/2212009 - 1/29/2009 012209 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318719 1129/2009 1/29/2009 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 111092 GOTZSCHE`OTTO 165.70 SAFETY GLASSES 00001601 203937 1012707524 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT -. 318.85 ANTI -SLIP STRAPS 00001251 204000 1012700015 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 318723 484.55 11011103, 318720 1/29/2009 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE PORTABLE DESKTOPS 00001640 204001 9818527823 120.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204043 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/2b,__ 8:22:25 Page - 11 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 120.00 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 318721 :1129/2009 COLLECTION SYSTEMS 123945 GOETZ; AMY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 84.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC .. 204108 012209 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN - 84.50 318722 1/29/2009 111092 GOTZSCHE`OTTO 71.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204109 012209 -. 71.50 318723 1129/2009 11011103, -3037 PORTABLE DESKTOPS 00001640 204001 9818527823 30.37 318724 1/29/2009 120201 GRANICUS'INC. 829.64. WEBSTREAMING - FEB 203935 10512 829.64 318725 1129/2009 102217 GRAPE`BEGINNINGS INC 854.00 204252 107161 854.00 318726 1/29/2009 100783. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 'a 10.66 PLUG ANGLE 00001602 203936 - 938974907 17.31 PLIERS 00001602203936 938974907 - 99.22 TIME CLOCK' - 00001602 203936 938974907 61.16 SWITCH 204002 938974906 296.41, LIGHTBULBS 00002139 204200 939055607 176.66 LIGHTBULBS 00002137.- 204201 939005104 661.42 318727 1129/2009 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO.. 580.80 SPRINKLER 14EPAIR -5252 LOCHLOY 204382 085286' 580.80 1/2b,__ 8:22:25 Page - 11 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5923.6406 GENERAL- SUPPLIES ' COLLECTION SYSTEMS 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET.GENERAL 1301.6556 TOOLS . GENERAL MAINTENANCE ,5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES'. 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES- CITY HALL GENERAL 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 'EDINBOROUGH PARK 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN - BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 12 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318728 1/29/2009 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 72.15 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204110 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 72.15 318729 112912009 123946 GREEN, VANESSA 61.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204111 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.10 318730 1129/2009 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 3,052.00 LESSONS 204346 012209 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 3,052.00 318731 1/29/2009 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1.15 203965 . 171753 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,414.35 203966 171883 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 62.54 204015 174920 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 147.83 204016 174917 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,256.40 204253 174930 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 35.81 204254 174931 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 88.60 204255 174746 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 591.32 204256 174928 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,291.54 204257 167375 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,599.32 204258 174932 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 542.84 204259 174927 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 32.52 204260 174926 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 73.10 204261 174925 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 667.15 204262 174924 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 17,219.25 204263 167376 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,122.45 204264 174919 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,740.25 204265 167369 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,432.79 204266 174921 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 438.37- 204267 769372 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 50,880.84 318732 1/29/2009 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204129 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 318733 1/29/2009 100788 H &L MESABI 597.89 POLY BLADE 00005932 204072 76736 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 597.89 R55CKREG __J20000 CITYOt iA 1/2b.- 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318734 1129/2009 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 119.18 REGISTER TAPE 204347 263165 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 119.18 . 318735 ;1/29 @009 114566 HARTKE, BRENDA 98.151 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204112 012209 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD, ART CENTER REVENUES 98.15 - .318736 .1/2912009 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 15,179.52 FUEL 00005411 204003 121780 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN '15,179.52 318737 • 1/29/2009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,390.85 TONKAZORB 00005755 204073 1267758 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,390.85 318738 112912009 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 17,553.40 PREMIUM 204202 31354626 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 17,553.40 318739 1129/2009 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 189.00 SILS /CAL SUPPORT, 204157 28097417 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 189.00 . ' 318740 1/2912009 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER - 265.00 UTILITY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 204203 012309 01363.1705.20 CONSULTINGDESIGN BA363 BLAKE RD M&O 265.00 318741 1/29/2009 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS - 145.70: VACUUM BAGS, DRAIN' CLEANER 00002134.204204 2736602 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES: EDINBOROUGH PARK 145.70 318742 1/2912009 100805. HIRSHFIELD'S . 56.98 PAINT 00006181 204348 003325036 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ,: CLUB HOUSE, •: 25.87 PAINT 00006181 204349 003325987 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE r, 82.85 318743 112912009 123947. HODGSON, PATTY 48.75 ART WORK SOLD AT,EAC,: 204113 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK-SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 318744 1129/2009 105962 HOFF, BRUCE 130.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 130.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 204044 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 318745 1/29/2009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,185.85 204017 475495 5842.5514 824.75 204268 475523 5862.5514 3,010.60 318746 1/29/2009 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 132.19 POOL CLEANERS 00002125 204383 8122930 5620.6545 132.19 318747 1/29/2009 119094 HUMANA DENTAL 524.13 PREMIUM 204205 931739974 1550.6043 10,652.57 PREMIUM 204205 931739974 1550.6040 11,176.70 318748 1129/2009 101233 IAAPA 539.00 2009 MEMBERSHIP 204206 2009 • 5621.6105 539.00 318749 1129/2009 123266 INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES USA IN 72,828.94 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.3 204369 013009 05481.1705.30 72,828.94 318750 1/29/2009 116924 INTELLICEPT 999.44 SKATESTOPPERS, EPDXY 00001659 204158 10498 4090.6406 997.59 SKATESTOPPERS, EPDXY 00001659 204159 10506 4090.6406 1,997.03 318751 1/29/2009 100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC 4,843.63 TRANSMISSION REPAIR 00001565 204004 R001026051:01 1553.6180 4,843.63 318752 1/29/2009 119811 JAMES, ROSE MARIE 70.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204130 012109 5101.4413 70.35 318753 1/29/2009 102146 JESSEN PRESS 340.69 RENTAL BROCHURES 00002331 204160 10687 5610.6575 340.69 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CHEMICALS COBRAINSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART WORK SOLD PRINTING EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION WM -481 M'SIDE H20MAIN PIPELINE STREET REVOLVING STREET REVOLVING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES ED ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -_.,JA 1/2812UU9 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318754 112912009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 44.00 203967 1232330 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,635.00 204269 1243039 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 44.00 204270 1243041 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,254.75 204271 1243042 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 43.00 204272 1243050 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 612.00 204273 933580 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,398.43 204274 1243049 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,031.18 318755 1/29/2009 123942 JOHN ADAMICH'S DODGE 243.75 BAR TRACK 00001657 204074 26277 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 243.75 318757 1/29/2009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,920.00 203968 1564541 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,378.30 204018 1568627 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 629.19 204019 1568625 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,046.10 204020 1568624 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 159.80 204021 1569319 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 189.92 204022 1569320 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,537.34 204275 1572071 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,060.93 204276 1572070 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,652.54 204277 1572073 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,620.28 204278 1572074 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.11 204279 1572072 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1.12 204280 1572061 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,881.26 204281 1572075 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 60.32 204282 1569414 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 494.10 204283 1568912 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,793.06 204284 1572063 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.11 204285 1572067 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 218.24 204286 1572064 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,008.17 204287 1572069 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 204288 1572059 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING .28 204289 1572057 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 204290 1572058 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,744.32 204291 1572065 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.50- 204292 405216 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 25,464.23 R55CKREG LOG20000 _ CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 16 1/2212009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318758 1/29/2009 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 120.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204056 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 220.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204135 12109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 340.00 318759 1/29/2009 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD W. 144.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 204045 012109 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 144.00 318760 1129/2009 102603 JONAS, LENORE 92.25 INSTRUCTOR AC 204057 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 91.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204114 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 310.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 204136 12109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 493.75 318761 1/29/2009 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 24.95 2009 UNIFORM PURCHASE 204075 012109 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 24.95 318762 1/29/2009 101846 JUST FRIENDS BIG BAND 100.00 ENTERTAINMENT 2/3109 204179 012309 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 318763 112912009 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 210.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204046 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 340.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 204046 012109 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 550.00 318764 112912009 111018 KEEPRS INC. 47.98 UNIFORM ACCESSORIES 204207 108375 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 47.98 318765 1/29/2009 100198 KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. 13.85 TOUCH -UP PAINT 204161 012109 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 23.00 PARKING FEE 204161 012109 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 84.23 CELL PHONE CHARGES 204161 012109 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 121.08 318766 1/29/2009 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 450.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204047 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 450.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -AA 1/28/2u09 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 17 1122/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318767 1129/2009 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 158.00 JAN 2009 SERVICE 204350 010109 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 158.00 318768 1129/2009 118334 KULLY SUPPLY INC. 125.42 REGULATOR, HOLDER, FITTINGS 00001260 204005 SI- 119526 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 125.42 318769 1129/2009 121707 KUZNIA, AARON 319.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 204351 012209 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 473.58 TRAINING EXPENSES 204351 012209 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 792.58 318770 1/29/2009 123937 LAMBERTZ, PETER 12.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 203938 012009 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS STREET REVOLVING 12.00 318771 112912009 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 46.03 LOGO CLOTHING 203939 07222335 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 46.03 318772 1/29/2009 123265 LANDWEHR CONSTRUCTION INC. 66,300.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.5 204370 013009 10091.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BR-3 Browndale Avenue Bridge 66,300.00 318773 112912009 117185 LANNERS, JENNIE 54.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204058 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 215.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204137 12109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 269.00 318774 112912009 121656 LAVEN, JANE 112.45 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204115 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 112.45 318775 1/2912009 123133 LAWN IRRIGATION BY LUKE LLC 398.90 SPRINKLER REPAIR -4632 BROWNDA(1005459 204384 7980 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 398.90 318776 1/2912009 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 73.73 WASHERS 00001638 204076 7677964 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 1/29/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1/28/2009 8:22:25 204162 30208 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING Council Check Register 204162 Page - 18 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,694.00 204162 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318777 1/29/2009 DATA PROCESSING 122033 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOES 204162 30208 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5.658.50 134.99 SAFETY BOOTS 00001645 203940 602432 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 318783 134.99 105677 MAGC 318778 1/29/2009 101466 LIEBER, JUDY MEMBERSHIP DUES 204209 MEM09SD 2210.6105 528.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204048 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2210.6105 528.00 60.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 204353 MEM09MD 318779 1/29/2009 120015 LOFTUS ORNAMENTAL IRON INC. 318784 1 900.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 204385 17708 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,900.00 318780 112912009 100858 LOGIS 1/29/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101453 LUT7, RICHARD M. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,257.00 204162 30208 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,526.50 204162 30208 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,694.00 204162 30208 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,717.00 204162 30208 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING 4,760.00 204162 30208 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5,194.00 204162 30208 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5.658.50 204162 30208 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 318781 1/29/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101453 LUT7, RICHARD M. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 255.81 UNIFORM PURCHASE 204208 012009 1400.6203 255.81 318782 1/2912009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,255.42 204293 53323 5862.5515 1,255.42 318783 1/29/2009 105677 MAGC 60.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 204209 MEM09SD 2210.6105 60.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 204352 MEM09JB 2210.6105 60.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 204353 MEM09MD 2210.6105 180.00 318784 1/29/2009 100868 MARK VII SALES 2,099.50 203969 423205 5842.5514 1,979.25 204294 422548 5862.5514 126.00 204295 422549 5862.5515 1,004.45 204296 422723 5862.5514 5,209.20 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS ASSESSING GENERAL (BILLING) FINANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF __.,JA Council Check Register 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318785 112912009 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 894.60 PLANTS 00002113 204210 45085 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 894.60 318786 1/29/2009 123847 MEDICA 84.93 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 204006 MARY BARBARA 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES DIXON 84.93 318787 112912009 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,354.25 PLYMOUTH PLAYHOUSE TRIP 204354 011409 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 2,354.25 318788 .112912009 103232 MEHA 120.00 WINTER CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 204007 012209 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 120.00 318789 1/29/2009 105464 MEDWER, DIANNE 46.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204116 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 46.80 318790 1/29/2009 101483 MENARDS 125.27 CLAMPS, TOOLS 00002324 204077 7698 -5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 125.27 318791 1/29/2009 100885 METRO SALES INC 1/281—tj 8:22:25 Page - 19 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS PUBLIC HEALTH ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES 6,424.19 COPIER MAINTENANCE 204163 312831 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,424.19 318792 1/29/2009 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 91.00 OFFICIATING FEES 204355 3491 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91.00 318793 1129/2009 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAT 186.35 LAMP ASSEMBLY 00001658 204078 462335FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 186.35 318794 1/29/2009 102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN 173.55 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204117 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 173.55 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 RUBBER METER GASKETS 00001332 204009 CITY OF EDINA 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 5,600.06 SHORT METERS Council Check Register 0235353 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 7,856.85 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 0235352 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 318795 1129/2009 104650 MICRO CENTER 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 10.64 FAN 00004466 203606 2061006 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.64 PVC HOSE 00001663 204081 0078747 -IN 1553.6530 318796 1/29/2009 217.78 116103 MID -WEST INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CO 250.00 THAW FROZEN WATER SERVICE 00001348 204008 39103 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 250.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204049 012109 5110.6103 318797 1/29/2009 270.00 118464 MIDWESTTESTING 1,210.00 METER TESTING 00001350 204211 1078 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,890.00 COMPOUND METER TESTING 00001702 204212 1079 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVE' 4,100.00 318798 1/2912009 102568 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI 75.00 DUES 204215 012209 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 75.00 318799 1/29/2009 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 280.65 CLAY 00009458 204079 55821 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 280.65 318800 1/29/2009 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 174.47 POSTAGE MACHINE INK 204080 55397 1550.6235 POSTAGE 174.47 318801 1/29/2009 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Page - 20 Business Unit Ufa i RICU i lull DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR METER REPAIR FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 215.43 RUBBER METER GASKETS 00001332 204009 0235292 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 5,600.06 SHORT METERS 00001327 204213 0235353 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 7,856.85 LONG METERS 00001333 204214 0235352 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 13,672.34 318802 1/2912009 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 207.68 SHELF 00001634 204010 0078737 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.10 PVC HOSE 00001663 204081 0078747 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 217.78 318803 1/29/2009 122241 MONAHAN, KIMBERLY 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204049 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.00 318804 1129/2009 118949 MY FABULOUS FIBERS 117.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204125 DEC2008 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVE' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF —_.AA 318611 Council Check Register 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 264.75 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 117.00 318812 1129/2009 318805 1/29/2009 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHI 256.15 CANVAS PANELS, PALETTE PADS 00009457 204083 36886700 400.00 MAGAZINE AD 00006174 204356 35901 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 400.00 318813 1129/2009 318806 1/29/2009 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 1,714.29 TONER CARTRIDGES, SUPPLIES 00002133 204218 459068185-001 2,235.47 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 204216 291 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MARKERS 00006034 204357 459533722 - 001 2,235.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,737.77 318807 1129/2009 101958 NICOL, JANET 318814 1/29/2009 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 54.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 204059 012109 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEC SERVICES 204164 W08120609 530.64 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 204138 12109 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 584.64 318808 1/29/2009 117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. 35,582.74 SALT 00005306 204217 70307999 1318.6525 SALT 35,582.74 318809 1/29/2009 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 1,499.55 VALVES 00001330 204011 S01181728.002 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,499.55 318810 1/29/2009 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 1 /28P[uU9 8:22:25 Page- 21 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO SNOW & ICE REMOVAL DISTRIBUTION 75.00 ENTERTAINMENT 2/8/09 204181 012309 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE 75.00 318611 1129/2009 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 264.75 CLEANERS 00001612 204082 5019924 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 264.75 318812 1129/2009 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 256.15 CANVAS PANELS, PALETTE PADS 00009457 204083 36886700 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 256.15 318813 1129/2009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 1,714.29 TONER CARTRIDGES, SUPPLIES 00002133 204218 459068185-001 5621.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.48 MARKERS 00006034 204357 459533722 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,737.77 318814 1/29/2009 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 436.74 DEC SERVICES 204164 W08120609 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 22 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.62 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.24 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 72.59 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 82.48 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 103.10 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 103.10 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 103.79 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 107.85 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 123.72 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 133.51 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 138.74 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 165.63 DEC SERVICES 204165 WOB120602 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 206.20 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 562.26 DEC SERVICES 204165 W08120602 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 2,401.57 318815 1129/2009 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 10.84 DRIVE LINK, WRENCH 00001503 204012 534697 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 73.75 WIRE ROPE 00001644 204219 536173 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 84.59 318816 1/29/2009 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 8,991.06 PARTIAL PAYMENT NOA 204371 012309 08049.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -49 9,424.07 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.8 204371 012309 08043.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -43 COUNTRY CLUB 25,742.83 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.B 204371 012309 04297.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST 34,319.69 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.8 204371 012309 03413.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 58,195.72 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.8 204371 012309 01213.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 61,116.13 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.B 204371 012309 01214.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 87,566.29 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.8 204371 012309 05436.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM 285,355.79 318817 1/2912009 102440 PASS, GRACE 55.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204118 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.25 318818 1/2912009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,655.75 203970 8210282 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,234.98 204297 8210855 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,175.77 204298 8210851 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 978.94 204299 8210853 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,045.44 i R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 318819 1/29/2009 123330 PEARSON KARI 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 180.00 CITY OF _ :.JA Council Check Register 1/22/2009 1/29/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 204050 012109 5110.6103 1 /2b,-_ -a 8:22:25 Page- 23 Subledger Account Description- Business Unite PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 318820 1/2912009 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 45.75 204166 13046768A 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS'SOLD VANVALKENBURG 425.85 204358 48219100 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 471.60 318821; 112912009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE &SPIRITS 2,799.04 204023 2706440 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.12 204024 2706441 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,668.92 204025 2706442 5862.5513 COST OF, GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 170.09 204026 2706937 ..5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE VERNON SELLING 1,382.84 204300 2709101 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,568.23 204301 2709099 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 49.12 204302 2709100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 151.22 204303 2709102 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING _ 567.33 204304 2709098 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR YORK SELLING 28.00 204305 2705870 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 204306 2705871 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.60 204307 2705869 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 'YORK SELLING 8,440.63 318822, :1/2912009 104717 � PHILLIPS, RAYMOND 205.13 UNIFORM PURCHASE 204359 012309 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 205.13 318823 1129/2009 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 2,083.52 DE -ICER 00001636 204386 . 208332 1318.6516 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,083.52 318824: 1/29/2009 100956 PIPE SERVICES CORP 326.00 INSPECTIONS /CERTIFICATIONS 204387 2007227 03444.1705.21 CONSULTING:INSPECTION SS-444 MIRROR LAKES N'HOOD' 374.63 INSPECTIONS /CERTIFICATIONS 204387 2007227 03446.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-446 S.GARDEN ESTATES,N'HOOD 529.00 INSPECTIONS /CERTIFICATIONS 204387 2007227 03445.1705.21 'CONSULTING: INSPECTION SS-445 FAIRFA_kN'HOOD 1,229.63 318825 1/29/2009 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 948.72 TIRES 00001495 204084 477302 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,236.14 TIRES; SERVICE 00001495 204085 480325 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 532.77 TIRES, VALVES, SCRAP 00001495 204086 486450 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 983.05 TIRES 00001495 204087 495859 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,700.68 318826 1/2912009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 5,000.00 UTILITY BILLING PERMIT #939 203954 012109 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 5,000.00 318827 112912009 104424 PRIEDE, SOREN 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204051 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 288.00 318828 1/29/2009 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 486.40 203971 171882 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 407.85 204308 174922 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 442.20 204309 174933 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,336.45 318829 1/29/2009 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES 150.34 WASHERS, NUTS, BOLTS 00001518 204167 80833 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.34 318830 1/29/2009 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 1,210.00 WELL HOUSE #20 204388 07037.14 05480.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 215.00 WELL HOUSE #3 204389 08016.07 05483.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM -483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX 1,425.00 318831 1/29/2009 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 544.22 ENTRANCE MAT 00002330 204088 4388 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 447.43 TOWELS, TISSUE, WYPALL 00002330 204089 4382 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 991.65 318832 1/29/2009 100971 QUALITY WINE 364.80 203972 110692 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,190.10 203973 109522 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,404.25 203974 109126-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,848.05 203975 110454 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.00- 203976 106543 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 590.00- 203977 106356 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,379.20 204027 112134 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,692.83 204310 112039 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,139.87 204311 112040 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,175.60 204312 112126 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Oh . .. +A 1/2b,_. - 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 25 1122/2009 - 1129/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,737.08 204313 112133 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 378.00 204314 111321 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 85.40 204315 112125-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 399.21 204316 112041 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 88.60 204317 112127 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 107.00 204318 111323 -00 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,334.30 204319 111322 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 180.00- 204320 106355 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 11.33- 204321 110062 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SAND.GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DATA PROCESSING CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL L-43 COUNTRY CLUB L-49 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST 17,470.96 318833 1129/2009 123898 QWEST 104.11 952 451 -6058 204220 6058 -1109 1400.6188 112.74 952 920 -8166 204360 8166 -1/09 1550.6188 216.85 318834 1/29/2009 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 245.90 TOILET REPAIR 00006188 204168 51347 5210.6180 167.70 TOILET REPAIR 00006187 204361 51496 5210.6180 413.60 318835 1/29/2009 118779 ROGGEMAN, ERIC 125.00 MNCPA TRAINING 204221 012209 1160.6104 125.00 318836 1/29/2009 105534 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINAIMORNINGSI 212.00 DUES - HEATHER WORTHINGTON 203941 1412 1120.6105 212.00 318837 1/29/2009 100987 SA-AG INC 125.48 SAND 00001617 204222 61045 5913.6517 130.45 SAND 00001617 204223 61036 5913.6517 255.93 318838 1/29/2009 118168 SANSIO 1,050.81 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 204225 INVO11912 1470.6160 1,050.81 318839 1/29/2009 100995 SEH 1,370.06 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR 204390 213326 08043.1705.24 1,826.74 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR 204390 213326 08049.1705.24 4,110.18 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR 204390 213326 04297.1705.24 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SAND.GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DATA PROCESSING CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL L-43 COUNTRY CLUB L-49 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/2212009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6,393.60 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR 204390 213326 03413.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 10,275.43 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR 204390 213326 01213.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 10,275.43 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR 204390 213326 01214.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 11,417.15 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR 204390 213326 05436.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 541.50 CITYWORKS SUPPORT 204391 212671 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,620.13 MANHOLE INSPECTION 204392 213115 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 48,830.22 318840 1/29/2009 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 47.99 NAME PLATE 204013 40310 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.99 318841 1129/2009 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 108.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204060 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 204060 012109 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 79.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204119 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 408.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 204139 12109 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,095.30 318842 1129/2009 101000 SIR SPEEDY 156.50 EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS 203942 59323 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 156.50 318843 112912009 123953 SLR15 RIFLES INC. 15,884.48 SLR15 RIFLES 00003022 204224 01022009 -1 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 15,884.48 318844 1129/2009 110977 SOW, ADAMA 254.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204120 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 254.80 318845 1/2912009 104672 SPRINT 4.96 204014 873184124 -074 1240.6188 TELEPHONE . 29.45 204014 873184124-074 7411.6188 TELEPHONE_ 50.79 204014 873184124 -074 1140.6188 TELEPHONE 50.90 204014 873184124 -074 1190.6188 TELEPHONE 51.00 204014 873184124 -074 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 56.68 204014 873184124 -074 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.88 204014 873184124 -074 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 64.79 204014 873184124 -074 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 129.89 204014 873184124 -074 1553.6188 TELEPHONE 129.97 204014 873184124 -074 2210.6188 TELEPHONE 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Page - 26 Business Unit PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS PHASE I ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS CITY COUNCIL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER POTTERY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PLANNING ASSESSING YORK OCCUPANCY PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION STREET REVOLVING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 318846 1129/2009 6,075.20 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 986.95 70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 986.95 204393 5863 -24 1500.6103 1/2b,_ .., 8:22:25 Page- 27 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CITY Or +A STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 143.19 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 204014 873184124 -074 1554.6230 144.15 TELEPHONE 204014 873184124 -074 1322.6188 274.61 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 204014 873184124 -074 1470.6188 333.56 BI97611 204014 873184124 -074 1260.6188 375.41 204014 873184124 -074 1495.6188 431.50 204014 873184124 -074 5620.6230 468.41 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 204014 873184124 -074 1301.6188 584.35 204014 873184124 -074 1640.6188 649.76 5410.6122 204014 873184124 -074 5910.6188 1,666.25 336.00 204014 873184124 -074 1400.6188 38.39 DATA CARDS 204090 666109817 -014 5910.6188 38.39 DATA CARDS 204090 666109817 -014 1322.6188 301.92 CONNECTION CARDS 204226 312188813 -014 1470.6188 6,075.20 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 986.95 70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 986.95 204393 5863 -24 1500.6103 1/2b,_ .., 8:22:25 Page- 27 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 318847 1/29/2009 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 1,061.29 CUTTING EDGES 00001562 203943 SI69395 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.83 WIPER BLADE 00001449 203944 SI69372 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 135.60 FILTERS 00001445 203945 SI69341 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.32 TUBE, O -RINGS 00001466 204091 BI97611 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,336.04 318848 1/29/2009 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 336.00 NEWSPAPER AD 204169 1007498528 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 336.00 318849 1/29/2009 123934 STOCKMAN TRANSFER INC. 1,600.00 COMPOST DELIVERED 00001264 204170 IVC0046687 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,600.00 318850 1/29/2009 106452 STONE, HOLLY 720.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204052 012109 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 720.00 318651 1129/2009 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 526.96 SPINNER ASSEMBLIES, HARNESSES0001561 203946 12423. 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 526.96 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 28 112212009 - 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 318852 1/29/2009 101015 STREICHERS 268.38 PRACTICE AMMO 204227 1590033 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVEL' 268.38 318853 1/29/2009 101765 STROH, STEVE 19.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 204228 012109 1400.6203 19.99 318854 1/29/2009 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 2/5/09 204180 012309 5610.6136 150.00 318855 1/29/2009 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 14.25 CAP 00001569 204092 152283CVW 1553.6530 14.25 318856 1129/2009 101336 SULLIVAN, MONICA 355.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204131 012109 5110.6103 355.00 318857 1/29/2009 120417 SULLIVAN, PAT 130.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204132 012109 5101.4413 130.00 318858 1/29/2009 103972 SUPERCIRCUITS INC. 139.84 MICRO VIDEO CCTV 204171 577901B 1400.6710 139.84 318859 1/29/2009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 560.00 204028 D8050 5842.5514 560.00 318860 1/29/2009 120560 SWEE, CINDY 59.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204121 012209 5101.4413 59.80 318861 1/29/2009 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 61.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204122 012209 5101.4413 61.75 318862 1/29/2009 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 94.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204362 012209 5101.4413 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVEL' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Or AA Council Check Register 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 1/2b —a 8:22:25 Page - 29 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -357 STORMWATER DREDGING ENGINEERING GENERAL WM-479 M'SIDE H2OMAIN EXC /PREP BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge LS37 LS REHAB @ WALNUT DRIVE LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 318868 1/29/2009 94.25 318863 1/2912009 514.19 101027 TARGET 308892 4090.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET REVOLVING 63.80 ACCT X- XXX -XX9 -840 204172 23130993264 5410.6406 63.80 318869 1/29/2009 100363 U.S. BANK 318864 1/2912009 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 68.67 SHIPPING CHARGES 204173 JAN2009 338.41 CONNECTORS, ALARM, PULSATOR00001460 204093 47005-00 1553.6530 204173 338.41 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 308.53 318865 1129/2009 204173 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 349.83 3,857.00 204173 204322 526344 5862.5514 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 63.65 UNIFORMS, BADGES 204323 526343 5862.5515 DEPT UNIFORMS 3,920.65 3,830.73 SMOKE DETECTORS, WORK BENCHES 204173 JAN2009 318866 1/29/2009 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 5,595.79 262.32 2009 DREDGING PROJECT 204394 000200805140 04357.1705.20 103973 ULINE 1,515.11 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 204395 000200805154 1260.6103 3,402.91 MORNINGSIDE WM LINING 204396 000200805148 05479.1705.21 3,061.20 BROWNDALE BRIDGE REPAIR 204397 000200805138 10091.1705.21 1,155.95 LIFT STATION PROJECT 204398 000200805143 10037.1705.21 1,155.96 LIFT STATION PROJECT 204398 000200805143 10038.1705.21 10,553.45 318867 1129/2009 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 305.00 203978 215176 5842.5514 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 1/2b —a 8:22:25 Page - 29 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -357 STORMWATER DREDGING ENGINEERING GENERAL WM-479 M'SIDE H2OMAIN EXC /PREP BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge LS37 LS REHAB @ WALNUT DRIVE LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 318868 1/29/2009 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 514.19 DOOR REPAIRS 00001643 203947 308892 4090.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET REVOLVING 514.19 318869 1/29/2009 100363 U.S. BANK 68.67 SHIPPING CHARGES 204173 JAN2009 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 156.88 MEETING FOOD 204173 JAN2009 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 308.53 STAMP PADS, GLASSES, CLOCKS 204173 JAN2009 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 349.83 SEMINAR 204173 JAN2009 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 881.15 UNIFORMS, BADGES 204173 JAN2009 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,830.73 SMOKE DETECTORS, WORK BENCHES 204173 JAN2009 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5,595.79 318870 1129/2009 103973 ULINE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 30 1/2212009 — 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 53.07 SCRUBS FOR EVIDENCE AREA 00003066 204230 26254379 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 53.07 318871 1/2912009 120839 UNITED FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATI 30.00_ 2009 MEMBERSHIP DUES 204231 012109 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.00 318872 112912009 108797 UNITED STATES POLICE CANINE AS 40.00 2009 MEMBERSHIP 204229 012009 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 40.00 318873 1/29/2009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 660.00 PESTICIDE TRAINING 00001265 204174 011309 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 660.00 318874 1/2912009 105911 UPPER MIDWEST COMMUNITY POLICI 225.00 INTERNAL AFFAIRS TRAINING 204232 958 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 318875 1/2912009 101354 USGA 110.00 F01255439VAE636JHNO 00006183 204363 2009 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 110.00 318876 1129/2009 100050 USPS- HASLER 8,000.00 POSTAGE #75983 203948 75983 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,000.00 318877 112912009 103500 VALLEY PAVING INC. 39,906.76 GARDEN PK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 204175 PMT 2 47051.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PARK PATHWAY 4,969.81 GARDEN PK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 204176 PMT 3 47051.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PARK PATHWAY 44,876.57 318878 1/2912009 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 4,459.99 WATERMAIN REPAIRS 00001349 204177 14162 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,459.99 318879 1/2912009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 404.82 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS 00007512 203949 109015-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 404.82 318880 1129/2009 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS .78 203950 1959224828 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 259326 CITY OF __.AA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 204030 Council Check Register 1129/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101550 VIKING IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 259864 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 8.77 203950 1959224828 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36.44 203950 1959224828 1640.6188 TELEPHONE 76.88 203950 1959224828 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 126.55 203950 1959224828 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 278.17 203950 1959224828 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 318887 1/29/2009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 5,625.12 3,158.53 1,446.91 325.60 .56 1550.6406 1400.6230 5210.6180 5110.6564 5110.6103 5440.6406 5440.6406 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1 /2b,_ -.d 8:22:25 Page - 31 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 204029 259326 527.59 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 204030 318881 1129/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101550 VIKING IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS 204031 259864 5862.5513 267.91 LICENSE DECALS 204094 2382 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 267.91 204327 260660 5862.5513 318882 1/29/2009 122059 WASHINGTON COUNTY FINANCIAL SE 3,888.97 MOTOROLA COST ALLOCATION 204233 62692 3,888.97 318883 1/2912009 119730 WEB ELECTRIC 385.74 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 00006186 204364 2499 385.74 318884 1/29/2009 104681 WEBB, DONNA 40.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 204053 012109 210.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 204053 012109 250.00 318885 1/29/2009 120554 WHITEHALL COMPANIES 56.70 POLY BAGS 00006180 204365 62774 37.80 POLY BAGS 00006180 204366 62771 94.50 318886 1/29/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 368.25 203979 210054 -00 1,314.90 204324 210475 -00 566.30 204325 210477 -00 502.30 204326 210474 -00 318887 1/29/2009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 5,625.12 3,158.53 1,446.91 325.60 .56 1550.6406 1400.6230 5210.6180 5110.6564 5110.6103 5440.6406 5440.6406 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1 /2b,_ -.d 8:22:25 Page - 31 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 204029 259326 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 204030 259866 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 204031 259864 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 204032 260011 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 204327 260660 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/28/2009 8:22:25 Council Check Register Page - 32 1/22/2009 — 1/29/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 998.06 204328 260661 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,554.78 318888 1/29/2009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,859.70 203980 222646 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,527.70 204329 223544 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 469.75 204330 223545 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 192.00- 204331 223419 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,665.15 318889 1129/2009 112752 WPS- MEDICARE PART B 339.71 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 203951 MARY BARBARA 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DIXON 339.71 318890 1/29/2009 123948 WYNKOOP, ANNE 84.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204123 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 84.50 318891 1/29/2009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 37.31 51- 5276505 -8 203952 182058879 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 37.31 318892 1129/2009 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 532.50 204033 3039 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 532.50 318893 1129/2009 118994 ZAMORA, DAWN 68.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 204124 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 68.25 318894 1129/2009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 105.33 PLATE 00001461 203953 PC001121323 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 340.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 204178 E6076404 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 445.33 1,145,157.68 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,145,157.68 Total Payments 1,145,157.68 R55CKSUM LOU20000 CITY OF . 1/28/- 8:24:19 Council Check Summary Page - 1 1/22/2009 - 1/29/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 201,888.23 02100 CDBG FUND 19,900.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,471.38 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 292,095.62 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 69,361.20 05100 ART CENTER FUND 17,723.18 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 19,103.40 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 109.87 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 3,442.93 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 893.91 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 22,253.37 05800 LIQUOR FUND 177,624.19 05900 UTILITY FUND 287,145.62 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 30,115.33 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 29.45 Report Totals 1,145,157.68 We confirm to the best of our lmowiedge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pol Iles pnd procedureste �1Y oe REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: February 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Received Since Last Council Meeting Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting . 01 a? HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612 -348 -9260 January 28, 2009 Mr. James Hovland Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.77, which authorized the creation of the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( HCHRA), requires the HCHRA to annually notify suburban HRAs and EDAs of the activities the HCHRA intends to operate within their communities. The HCHRA is administering several suburban Hennepin County programs in the year 2009. Communities may exercise their option to not have the HCHRA administer one or more of the activities within their community by notifying the HCHRA to that effect, within 45 days of the date of this notice. The HCHRA is administering the following programs: • Minnesota Cities Participation Program, First -Time Homebuyer Mortgages — Valerie Hutchinson (612- 348 - 4969). • Minnesota Housing Rehabilitation Program — Jim Graham (612- 348 - 2235). • Minnesota Housing Community Revitalization Fund Program — single - family, accessibility modular ramp grant — Carol Stinar (612- 348 - 2670). • Hennepin Homeownership Program (HHP) — per unit homebuyer grants to our partners West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT), Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity and City of Lake Land Trust (CLCLT) to create homeownership opportunities for underserved households — Valerie Hutchinson (612- 348 - 4969). BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mike Opat Mark Stenglein Gail Dorfman Peter McLaughlin Randy Johnson Jan Callison Jeff Johnson Mayor Hovland January 28, 2009 Page 2 Affordable Housing Incentive Fund Program (AHIF) — developed in response to the shortage in Hennepin County of housing affordable to low- income households. As a requirement of the AHIF Program, all project proposals must have municipal support prior to actually receiving assistance. The HCHRA will be requiring a city council resolution (if not currently in place) in support of selected AHIF projects — Carol Stinar (612- 348 - 2670). • Lead Hazard Control Program — AHIF funded activity to assist private owners address lead hazards in eligible affordable rental properties. AHIF funds supplement a HUD- funded program that assists private owners address lead hazards in eligible properties. AHIF funds specifically support assistance for affordable efficiency units — Mike Jensen (612 -348- 2114). • Transit Oriented Development Program (TOD) — designed to assist development proximate to priority transit corridors and hubs. As a requirement of the TOD Program, all project proposals must have municipal support prior to actually receiving assistance. The HCHRA will be requiring a city council resolution (if not currently in place) in support of selected TOD projects — Patrick Connoy (612- 348 - 2215). We look forward to continuing to work with you in implementing these programs and to develop additional innovative approaches to address housing and community development needs. Please contact Housing, Community Works and Transit Department program managers listed above for further details on the programs or specific funding allocations. Since Philip C. ert Deputy Executive Director cc: Commissioner Mike Opat Commissioner Gail Dorfinan Commissioner Randy Johnson Commissioner Jeff Johnson Gordon Hughes, City Manager Commissioner Mark Stenglein Commissioner Peter McLaughlin Commissioner Jan Callison Comcast. January 15, 2009 Mr. Gordon Hughes City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Subject: FRANCHISE RENEWAL Dear Gordon: Comcast Cable 9705 Data Park Minnetonka, MN 55343 Via Certified U.S. Mail We at Comcast appreciate the opportunity to serve the citizens of Edina. It is our credo that Comcast will deliver a superior experience to our customers every day. Our products will be the best and we will offer the most customer - friendly and reliable service in the market. In living our credo, we look forward to providing broadband services to our customers in Edina for many years to come. Therefore, we are taking this step to ensure the renewal of our franchise with you. The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 ( "the 1984 Cable Act ") encourages franchisors and cable operators to reach renewal agreements at any time through an informal process of discussion. However, Section 626 of the 1984 Cable Act also provides for commencement of a formal renewal procedure. To preserve our statutory rights to this formal procedure, this letter is.our official notice to you invoking that provision. This letter is not intended to introduce a new formality into our discussions, nor is that the intention of the 1984 Cable Act. In fact, we prefer to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement through informal negotiations, thus making many of the 1984 Cable Act's formal procedures unnecessary. I will be happy to discuss this matter with you, or provide any additional information that you may require. I look forward to meeting with you in the near future and to continuing a relationship that, we believe, benefits both the community and the residents of Edina. Sincerely, Lance Leupold Director of Government Affairs cc: Brian Grogan, Administrator, Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Brad Dusto, West Division President Debbie Luppold, West Division Vice President of Government Affairs Sheila Willard, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs METRO CITIES Association of Metropolitan Municipalities January 21, 2009 TO: Mayors, City Managers /Administrators and Councilmembers FROM: Dave Osberg, President, Metro Cities Board of Director RE: Vacancies on Metro Cities Board of Directors BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCIES NOMINATIONS SOLICITED Due to recent local election outcomes, there are two vacancies on the Metro Cities. Board of Directors effective January 1, 2009. We are seeking officials to fill these vacancies for the remainder of these terms. In addition, the Metro Cities Board seeks to fill four additional vacancies for members whose terms will expire this June. The Metro Cities Board consists of 19 city officials, and is responsible for the overall direction of Metro Cities' staff, approval of the annual budget and work program, establishment of the annual dues schedule and determination of yearly legislative priorities. The Board also makes appointments to the Met Council's Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and the Metro GIS Policy Board. The Board meets the third Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. We are soliciting nominations from all parts of the metro area. Board members can be elected or administrative officials. Nominations should be submitted in writing, should include a brief resume of the nominee, and should be submitted to Laurie Jennings. Nominations should be received no later than Monday, February 9, 2009. Please call Patricia Nauman, Metro Cities' Executive Director, at 651- 215 -4002 if you have any questions, or would like additional information. 145 University Ave W e St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 • Phone (651) 215 -4000 • Fax (651) 281 -1299 • www.amml45.org ., Metropolitan Council v January 15, 2009 RECEIVED The Honorable James Hovland JAN 111009 Mayor, City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Livable Communities Tax Base Revitalization Account Grant Award Dear Mayor Hovland: I am pleased to inform you that on January 14, 2009, the Metropolitan Council awarded the City of Edina a Livable Communities Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) grant for $317,400 for the Pentag6n Park Hotel project. The Council received 20 applications and awarded grants to 13 projects this cycle. Awards are determined by a competitive process that favors projects such as this one that result in significant increases in jobs and tax base in relationship to the amount of funding requested, or add affordable housing units, and are consistent with the policies and goals of the Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework. A grant agreement specifying the payment procedures, reporting requirements and agreement expiration date will be drafted for the city's review within the next few weeks. After both the city and Council representatives sign the agreement, reimbursement requests may be submitted. If you have questions about grant administration procedures, please contact Deb Jensen at 651 -602- 1554. Congratulations on your successful application. The Metropolitan Council is pleased to assist local communities through its Livable Communities programs with projects that help achieve both local and regional goals. Sincere' e er Bell Chair cc: Cary Teague, Planning Director, City of Edina Polly Bowles, Metropolitan Council Member, District 5 Guy Peterson, Director, Community Development www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer December 30, 2008 Ms. Debra Mangen City Clerk City of Edina 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Clerk Mangen: As residents of Edina who live on France Avenue South, we strongly support the proposed extension of the sidewalk on the west side of France Avenue from W 48th Street to Sunnyside Road. There are many residents in our area near Sunnyside Road who walk to the shopping area near 50"' and France. Crossing to the east side and navigating the often poorly- maintained sidewalk on the Minneapolis side is both dangerous and inconvenient, especially in winter. We urge the Edina City Council to extend the walk on this heavily traversed throughway as proposed for action at the January 6 meeting. Encouraging walking and enhancing the residential character of the area is a most worthy endeavor and one of the distinctions of Edina (recently listed among America's most - walkable cities). Thank you for your kind attention to this request. Si cerely, r R6cha Cook and Terry L hti 4360 ance Avenue S. Edina, MN 55410 %;+ C L Page 1 of 1 Susan Heiberg From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:39 PM Cc: Susan Heiberg RECEIVE4 Subject: FW: YMCA Redevelopment JAN 1 120 From: Gerhard Knutson [mailto: Gerhard. Knutson@KnutsonVentilation.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:09 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: YMCA Redevelopment Edina City Council: Often we feel "Not in my backyard ". We have another opportunity today. The YMCA Redevelopment project will include affordable housing in Edina. The 130 housing units are needed to provide housing opportunities in our community. Any undertaking of this size will increase demands on the infrastructure. Traffic, utilities, congestion, etc. will increase. The same concerns must have been discussed when you considered the Westin Edina Galleria (a 225 room hotel and 82 spacious condominiums). The YMCA Redevelopment project will address a unique problem. The location is ideally suited with existing mass transit and community shopping. This is a project Edina can and should support. It is a project we will be proud of once it is completed. I urge the Edina City Council to support the YMCA Redevelopment Project. Thank you, Gerhard Knutson 3404 West 60th Street Edina, MN 55410 952 - 928 -0195 1/21/2009 RECEIVED JAN .1 b 1009 January 6d' 2009 To Brian Hubbard EPD #187, SGT Vik Konters EPD, Nicole Pesek EPD192, Denise Beck Dispatch #301, Todd Shaterd EFD medic, and Pat S EFD #79: In looking back at 2008, the absolute greatest highlight was the birth and blessing of our son Reagan John Reich and all of you coming to our rescue! ! ! We knew we were in the best hands when you all arrived, as you assured us each step of the way. Also a thank you to Denise for trying to encourage my husband to have me lay down between contractions until everyone arrived. Though I had a hard time cooperating, all in all it was a great distraction. Every decision was made quickly and accurately from your arrival in our bedroom, to out the door with the stretcher, even offering to bring our five year old Weston to his grandparents. Can you even imagine all the times we recount and retell our birthing story of Reagan, starting out with how impressed we are with Edina's finest EPD and EFD. Also including such details as leaning into the phone -saying "Come now, help me bring drugs!!", SGT Vik asking "Where are your linens ", Nicole looking in my eyes assuring me everything was going to be okay to "Move her, move her to the ambulance before the next contraction!!" and the gentleman that Brian Hubbard is, would only make complete sense that he was the one to hold the front door open. Next, Pat the paramedic, "Can I squeeze your hand REALLY tight ?" and he replied, "Yes, as long as you still breath!" Todd saying, "If we tell you to pull over, it's because we can't make it to the hospital." I knew I had two grew paramedics when we arrived in the emergency room, and all ten emergency staff members were looking at the elevator, and Pat said, "Decision now, Emergency Room or 2nd floor Labor and Delivery?" As you know, I, stayed in the emergency room, but I didn't want Todd or Pat to leave my side. The care I received from you was more reassuring. I was certain ER staff did not like delivering babies. My husband arrived just in time! Had he parked the car, he would have missed the birth. He said I was so calm, he was certain you had given me drugs, but no such luck. Although it was my goal to have a drug -free delivery, God made sure that my goal would be achieved. The final blessing before his birth was the doctor that was on call that Sunday on the second floor Labor and Delivery walked in, and it was the same doctor that delivered our first son, Weston, who we loved and knew! Reagan was born at 5:55 am and I hear you all got off at 6 am as scheduled, so I'm glad we could do our part, and not make you work overtime that day. Thank you for the surprise gift bag on our front door step, a card that each "of you took the time to sign and the burp rag with Reagan's first Edina PD and Edina FD patches. We wouldn't be surprised if our son grows up to choose one of your professions. He sure has a great beginning and heart call to his life story. We will never forget the care, professionalism, accuracy, and each of you will be our heroes forever!! ! ! Blessings to you all. With gratitude, Jo , Scott, Weston and Reagan Reich I 1 RE/1rGA/l% D� �S�o� Page 1 of.1 RECEIVL,, I . JAN 2 b 2009 Mike Siitari To: Personnel File Subject: FW: a credit to the department From: Pauline Laybourn [mailto:prlaybourn @msn.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:10 AM To: Molly Anderson Subject: a credit to the department In the early morning of January 22, 2009, the underground garage in my apartment complex was the site of auto theft. When I was called to the garage to identify my car, Officer Adam L'Heureux introduced himself and took my report. His professional and caring manner was obvious from the first moment. This enote is to commend him and let your department know that he is viewed as a credit to you, as well as to Edina in general. Thanks to the Edina Police Department, and to Officer L'Heureux specifically, for careful and respectful handling of this incident. Pauline Laybourn Edina Highland Villa (resident - apt 307) 5290 Villa Way Edina, MN 55436 Windows Live TM: E -mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. Check it out. 1/27/2009 IiF IT REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: February 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. RAI Susan Heiberg Lynette Biunno nt: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:45 PM %X: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Cancelling 2/17 hearing on Vacation of a portion of Belmore Lane RECEIVED - - - -- Original Message---- - From: T Volk [mailto:volk239@9mail.com] FEB 0 3 W Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:23 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Cancelling 2/17 hearing on Vacation of a portion of Belmore Lane bear Council Members, By Interlachen Country Club's request, CUP process has been tabled last week, so there is no scheduling for CUP hearing in today's Agenda. At the City Council meeting, there was an assurance from the Council that there will be no Vacation hearing in the absence of hearing on Interlachen Club CUP on 2/17. However, I don't see an item on the Agenda about formally cancelling the 2/17 hearing on Vacation of Belmore Lane. Please adapt said cancellation resolution tonight. Thank you, Ted Volk 6301 Belmore Lane i RECEIVED Kurt Sletterdahl FEB 0 3 2009 6000 Saxony Rd. Edina MN 55436 James Hovland Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50`x' St. Edina, MN 55424 February 1, 2009 Dear Mr. Hovland: In this part of Edina, Comcast has a monopoly on high -speed internet service. That is bad for consumers, and a failure of the marketplace. In this part of Edina, there is no Qwest 1.5Mbps DSL internet service, no Qwest 7Mbps DSL internet service, no Qwest 12Mbps fiber -optic internet service, and no Qwest 20Mbps fiber -optic internet service. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission doesn't have jurisdiction in this area, so Qwest is under no regulatory pressure to improve or expand their internet services. I was extremely disappointed to learn that the City of Edina has no plans to install a Wi -Fi internet service, like the City of Minneapolis. I hope that you will change your position on this matter. Sincerely, c Kurt Sletterdahl RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2019 Susan Heiberg -.om: Lynette Biunno nt: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:11 PM _.s: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: vote on sidewalk -- France from Sunnyside to 48th - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ingrid LeMunyon [mailto:ilemunyon@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:10 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: vote on sidewalk - - France from Sunnyside to 48th February 3, 2009 bear Members of Edina City Council and other interested parties: We are writing to voice support for the proposed sidewalk on France Avenue between Sunnyside Road and W. 44th Street. As- residents of the Morningside neighborhood (4316 Eton Place), we feel that at this time the available walkways from 44th St. /France to 50th /France areas are lacking in accessibility. Without a sidewalk on the west side of France, the ability for reaching the 50th and France shopping district on foot is not safe. Although there is a walkway on the Mpls. side of the street, traffic flow and stoplights make it very difficult to utilize it from the west side of France. Also, Mpls, unlike Edina's proposal, does not have e city regularly plowing the walk. In addition, Metro- transit bus stops on the southbound line drop patrons on the curbs without any safe walkway. This is particularly dangerous during the winter months, when traffic can be hazardous and snow drifts and plow piles are too high to easily walk over or around. As we understand, the proposed walkway will cost $300,000.00 - -an expenditure that would come from a special state -aid fund directed at such civic projects and not come from either the city budget or from an assessment of the residents whose property backs up to the proposed walkway. In addition, we understand that several trees may need to be removed from the boulevard between the curb and the walkway. Please note, that in our neighborhood, due to the above - ground electrical wiring, Excel Energy regularly prunes these trees so much that they are little more than bare trunks. Their necessary removal would also save these yearly pruning costs. As Edina works toward a more eco- friendly and "walkable" city, residents as close to 50th /France as the Morningside neighborhood should have a quick and safe access route that will encourage foot travel instead of discouraging it. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jeffrey and Ingrid LeMunyon 4316 Eton Place Edina 55424 1 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, January 26, 2009 Room 349, Edina Community Center AGENDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of January 12, 2009 Approval of Minutes of Meeting of January 12, 2009 NGS OF INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS. AND PRESENTATION OF FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS B OTHER ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL) COMMENDATIONS iRE TH i; ➢ State Champions — Edina High School Girls' Tennis Team ➢ National Board Certification® — Bianca Suglia, Grade 5 Teacher, Normandale Elementary School ➢ TIES 2008 Exceptional Teacher Award — Dean Dahl, Grade 6 Teacher, South View Middle School; and Jon Zetah, Grade 3 Teacher, Cornelia Elementary School REPORTS ➢ Fall MAP Test Results — Dr. Thel Kocher, Director of Research & Evaluation ➢ 2009 -10 Planning - Dr. Ric Dressen, Superintendent CONSENT 259 Personnel Recommendations . 484 -487 260 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 488 261 Expenditures Payable on January 26, 2009, appended 489 262 Alternative Facilities Bond Expenditures Payable on.January 14, 2009 490 -491 263 Edina Family Center Alternative Compensation Goal Revision 492 264 Commendation of Bianca Suglia 493 265 Commendation of Dean Dahl and Jon Zetah 494 266 Commendation_ of Edina High School 2008 -2009 Girls' Tennis Team 495 267 Commendation of Edina High School 2008 -2009 Girls Soccer Team 496 268 Commendation of Edina High School 2008 -2009 Girls` Swimming 497 and Diving Team 269 Commendation of South Suburban Adapted Soccer Team — Cl - 498 the Jets 270 Commendation of South Suburban Adapted Soccer Team —PI — .499 the Flyers 271 Gifts from Countryside Elementary School PTO 500 272 Gift from. Skin Care Doctors, P.A. 501 273 Gift from Noodles & Company 502 274 Gift from Edina High School Volleyball Club 503 275 Gift from Cynthia Ann Coughlin 504 276 Gift from Concord Elementary School PTO 505 277 Gifts from Edina Athletic Booster Club 506 278 Gift from Edina Girls' Basketball, Inc. 507 ACTION 279 2008 -2009 Board Committee Appointments, Liaisons and 508 -510 Representatives 280 2009 -2010 Budget Reductions 511 -512 281 2009 -2010 Early Childhood through Grade 12 School Calendar 513-514 282 2009 -2010 Edina High School Late Start/Early Dismissal Schedule 515 283 School Start/End Times for 2009 - 2010 516 -518 284 Pay Equity Implementation Report, appended 519 285 Property /Liability Insurance 520 286. Vehicle Insurance . 521 287 Edina Community Center Gym Entrance Ceiling 522 288 New Policy 6156 — Instruction, Out -of- School Tutoring 523 -524 289 New 400 Series Policies — Personnel, Phase III, appended 525 290 Revised Appendix II for Policy 6149 — Instruction, Student Activity 526 -528 Programs INFORMATION 291 Enrollment as of December 19, 2008 292 Appendix II for Policy 509 — Students, Resident Enrollment 293 Edina Concert Choir Performing Tour to Chicago LEADERSHIP UPDATE Superintendent's Report Board Committee Minutes State of Community Event (February . 18, 2009, 11:30 Ann — 1:00 PM, Edinborough Park, Edina Adjournment 529 530 -531 532 *Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board.