HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-03-03_COUNCIL MEETING4
F
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL,
MARCH 3, 2009
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are
considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests
it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its
normal sequence on the Agenda.
EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of February 17, 2009
II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per Pre -list Dated February 19,
2009, Total $337.50
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
City Engineers Association of Minnesota - 2008 Project of the Year
American Council Of Engineering Companies of Minnesota - Grand Award of Engineering
Excellence
Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers - Seven Wonders of Engineering
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of February 17, 2009, Executive
Session of February 17, 2009 and Study Session of February 24, 2009
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
During "Public Hearings, " the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff
members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are
welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To
ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public
hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines:
• Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify
times, as deemed necessary.
• Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit
testimony to the matter under consideration.
Agenda/Edina City Council
March 3, 2009
Page 2
• In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the
use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or
nonverbal communication is not allowed.
A. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Edina School District, 5701
Normandale Road, Construct New Maintenance Building, Resolution No. 2009-
29 (Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to approve)
III. PUBLIC COMMENT
During "Public Comment," the City Council will invite comments from those in
attendance who would like to speak about something not on tonight's agenda.
Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an
issue for which a public hearing was held by the Council within the last thirty days
or a matter scheduled for a future hearing on a specific date.
Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments.
Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future
meeting.
IV. AWARD OF BID
* A. 2009 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4X4 Pick Up Truck — Park Maintenance
Department
* B. 2009 Jacobsen Rotary Mower - Park Maintenance Department
* C. One Articulated Loader - Street Department
* D. One Ton Truck - Street Department
V. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority Council Members
present to approve except where noted)
A. Morningside Water Rate Report
B. Park Board Appointment
C. On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale, and Sunday Sale Liquor License
Renewals
D. Wine License Renewals
E. Beer License Renewals
F. Gateway Livable Communities Grant
* G. Stipend for Commissioner to Attend Out Of State Conference
VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve)
* A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated
February 19, 2009, TOTAL $472,923.77; and dated February 26, 2009,
TOTAL $1,096,009.38
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
Tues
Tues
Mon
Tues
Tues
Tues
Tues
Tues
Wed
�Tues
Tues
Tues
Mon
Tues
Tues
Tues
Tues
Agenda/Edina City Council
March 3, 2009
Page 3
VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS
IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If
you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print
documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the
meeting.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS
Mar 3
Work Session - Joint Meeting with BETF
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Mar 3
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mar 16
Annual Meeting Of Boards & Commissions
5:00 P.M.
WARREN HYDE CLUBHOUSE
Mar 17
Work Session
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Mar 17
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mar 24
Study Session - To be determined
7:00 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Apr 7
Regular Meeting
7 :00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Apr 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Apr 22
Volunteer Recognition
5:00 P.M.
EDINBOROUGH PARK
Apr 28
Study Session - To be determined
11:30 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
May 5
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
May 19
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
May 25
MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
May 26
Study Session - To be determined
7:00 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Jun 2
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Jun 16
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Jun 23
Study Session - To be determined
11:30 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 17, 2009
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and
Chair Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by
seconded by Commissioner Swenson for approval
Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Commissioner Bennett and
of the Edina Housing and
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3. 2009 APPROVED Motion
made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving
the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
for February 3, 2009.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and
seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the payment of claims dated
February 5, 2009 TOTAL $7,350.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
14021 2119/2009 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC
337.50 TIF PAYMENT CALCULATION
337.50
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register.
2/19/2009 — 2/19/2009
Doc No Inv. No Account No
205795 338881 9134.6103
2/18/2009 8:20:20
Page - 1
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT
337.50 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 337.50
Total Payments 337.50
R55CKSUM .0000 CITY l VA 21 3 8:20:24
Council Check Summary Page - 1
2/19/2009 - 2/19/2009
Company
09000 HRA FUND
Amount
337.50
Report Totals 337.50
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies 4ind
procedures date 4�- I t 4 10 ^
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item #
From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑
City Engineer Information Only
Date: March 3, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
To Council
Subject: Awards for West 70th Street Action E] ❑Motion
Roundabouts ❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Info /Background:
Three professional organizations have recognized the West 70`h Street Roundabout project as
an outstanding project. The three organizations and their criteria are:
Citv Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM):
2008 Project of the Year:
This award is rated on:
•
Public benefit and service nature of
project
•
Design characteristics and features or
innovations
•
Construction management- scheduling
and control techniques
•
Environmental considerations
•
Community relations
•
Safety performance and overall safety
program employed during construction
•
Unusual accomplishments under
adverse conditions
' •
Construction quality
•
Construction innovations
American Council of Engineering Companies of
Minnesota (ACEM:
Grand Award Winner (one of ten)
The award is rated on:
® Uniqueness /originality
Complexity
® Exceeding the needs of the
owner /client
a Social, economic and sustainable
design considerations
0 Future value to the engineering
profession
0 Positive public impact (enhancing
perception /awareness of the
profession)
F
1
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 17, 2009
7:03 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by
Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3. 2009, AND STUDY SESSION OF
FEBRUARY 3. 2009, APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by
Member Swenson approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 3, 2009, and
Study Session Meeting of February 3, 2009.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2009 —
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -23 APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented and ordered placed
on file.
Associate Planner Presentation
Associate Planner Repya presented staffs recommendation for disbursement of the $158,956
2009 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funds:
$5,505 to Jewish Vocational Services (JVS), $12,803 to Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the
Elderly (HOME), $3,505 to Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH),
$2,030 to Homel-ine, $53,133 to Rehabilitation of Private Property Program, and $82,000 to West
Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust.
Member Swenson disclosed that she was a member of the Board of the Community Action
Partnership of Suburban Hennepin County. Manager Hughes acknowledged Member Swenson
had disclosed her membership and was able to vote on the matter.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared to comment.
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Housh made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -23, approving the proposed
use of 2009 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Funds and
authorizing execution of sub recipient agreements with Hennepin County and any third
party agreements. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON WEST 70TH STREET — TRAFFIC STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS
RECEIVED AND ACCEPTED Affidavits of Notice were presented and ordered placed on file.
Page 1
I
Minutes /Edina City Council /February 17, 2009
Steve Brown, Study Advisory Committee (SAC) Chair, advised of the process used and input
received from people at meetings and through surveys. He noted the Committee's
recommendations were broken into three phases and presented the nine recommendations
contained in Phase 1. Mr. Brown then presented Phase 2 and Phase 3 recommendations and
suggested that once Phase 1 recommendations were in place, Phase 2 recommendations be
considered.
Marie Cote, SRF Consulting, answered questions and gave details regarding specific
recommendations.
Geoff Workinger, Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) Chair, noted that all of the
Transportation Commissioners were members of the Study Advisory Committee and, on January
15, 2009, adopted the recommendations that were presented tonight.
The Council asked questions of Mr. Brown, Ms. Cote, Mr. Workinger and staff and discussed the
Study.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m.
Public Testimony
Surya lyer, Energy & Environment Commission Chair, referenced their resolution that urged
support of trails and pathway projects as a top priority.
Jonathan Vlaming, Three Rivers Park District, displayed a map of the Nine Mile Regional Trail and
potential alignments, or routes, of the Trail east of Highway 100, including a
potential side path in front of the homes on the south side of West 70th Street locations where
crossings of Highway 100 could be created. He stated the Park District had no preference and
considered all potential alignments sfess.ing- lesatiens to be viable.
Josh Sprague, 4720 West Shore Drive addressed the Council on behalf of Ron Rich, 7008 West
Shore Drive.
Colby Wilkins, 4515 West 70th Street, addressed the Council.
Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Council.
Josh Sprague, 4720 70th Street West, addressed the Council.
Kristine NZorton, 7007 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council.
Todd Brewer, 5901 St. Johns Avenue, Edina Bike Task Force Member, addressed the Council.
Kari Ciardelli, 4417 West 70th Street, addressed the Council.
Dr. Bob McKlveen, 5261 Lochloy Drive, addressed the Council.
Alice Hulbert, 7221 Tara Road, addressed the Council.
Jan Ferrell, 4704 West 70th Street, addressed the Council.
Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Page 2
Minutes /Edina City Council /February 17, 2009
Motion carried.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to keep the written
comment period open until March 3, 2009 and to receive and accept the West 70th Street
Traffic Study Recommendations with noted modifications.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
The meeting was recessed at 9:18 p.m. and reconvened at 9:26 p.m.
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -28 ADOPTED UPHOLDING VARIANCE DENIAL OF ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS — 6120 BROOKVIEW AVENUE, JMS CUSTOM HOMES Affidavits of Notice
presented and ordered placed on file.
Assistant Planner Presentation
Assistant Planner Aaker presented details of the appeal received from JMS Custom Homes
following the January 28, 2009, Zoning Board of Appeals' denial of JMS's request for a variance
from front -yard setback for the home under construction at 6120 Brookview Avenue. Ms. Aaker
read the findings of fact and advised that on January 9, 2009, the applicant submitted a written
appeal to the City Council.
Proponent Presentation
Jeff Schoenwetter, Proponent, presented his appeal of the Zoning Board of Appeal's denial for a
variance of the house under construction at 6120 Brookview Avenue.
Peter Coyle, Proponent's Attorney from Larkin Hoffman, presented his client's appeals giving
details of their position and reviewing the time line of the construction. He requested the Council to
grant his client the requested front yard setback variance.
The City Council asked questions of staff and proponent.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:53 p.m.
Public Testimony
Richard Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Jacqueline Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Joseph Lawver, 6121 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
James Blue, 9610 Sky Lane, Eden Prairie, addressed the Council.
Danielle Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Trudy Landgren, 6104 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Council.
Carol McDonnell, 4609 West 62nd Street, addressed the Council.
Mickie Turk, 6141 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Joseph Clay, 6117 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Page 3
Alip
Minutes /Edina City Council /February 17, 2009
John Swanson, 6424 Nordic Circle, addressed the Council.
Dan Hurley, 6017 Killarney Lane, addressed the Council.
Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Housh introduced Resolution No. 2009 -28, Denying a Front Yard Setback Variance
at 6120 Brookview Avenue, as amended to add language in Section 2.01, 9) "...the Applicant
was an experienced, professional custom -home builder which had constructed over forty
new homes in Edina." Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO MARCH 3. 2009 — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — EDINA
SCHOOL DISTRICT, 5701 NORMANDALE ROAD, CONSTRUCT NEW MAINTENANCE
BUILDING Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to continue
the public hearing to March 3, 2009, for the Edina School District, 5701 Normandale Road,
Construct New Maintenance Building.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*PUBLIC HEARING CANCELLED — VACATION OF PORTION OF BELMORE LANE AND
WATERMAIN EASEMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member
Swenson to cancel the public hearing on the vacation of 'a portion of Belmore Lane and
Watermain Easement.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Gary Vierkant, Vierkant Disposal, requested an exemption to the No Right Turn from Valley View
Road into the Chapel Hills neighborhood to service his customers. Mayor Hovland referred this
request to the Traffic Safety Review Board.
*AWARD OF BID — CUSHMAN TURF TRUCKSTER UTILITY VEHICLE — BRAEMAR GOLF
COURSE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding
the bid for Cushman Turf Truckster Utility Vehicle, Braemar Golf Course to the
recommended low bidder, Turfwerks at $17,692.85.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — REPLACEMENT. CARPET FOR WARREN C. HYDE CLUBHOUSE —
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member
Swenson awarding the bid for replacement carpet for Warren C. Hyde Clubhouse, Braemar
Golf Course to the recommended low bidder, LaVan Floor Covering at $22,989.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — 2009 CHEVROLET SILVERADO PICK UP TRUCK — PARK MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson
awarding the bid for 2009 Chevrolet Silverado, Pick Up Truck, Park Maintenance Department,
to the recommended low bidder, Car/Truck City, State Bid Contract #440137, at $22,044.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — WELL NO. 13 REHABILITATION — 6721 SECOND STREET, CONTRACT
NO. PW 09 -1. IMP. NO. WM 491 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member
Swenson awarding the bid for Well No. 13 Rehabilitation, 6721 Second Street, Contract No.
Page 4
Minutes /Edina City Council /February 17, 2009
PW 09 -1, Improvement No. WM-491 to the recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner and Sons,
Inc. at $81,241.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*2009 ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPOINTED Motion made by Member Bennett and
seconded by Member Swenson to appoint Park Superintendent Vince Cockriel as the
Assistant Weed Inspector for calendar year 2009.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -25 APPROVED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland
explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by
Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member
Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2009 -25 accepting various donations. Member Housh
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -26 APPROVED SETTING MARCH 17, 2009 PUBLIC HEARING DATE
FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS — SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES & MIRROR LAKES
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION Motion made by Member Bennett and
seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -26 Setting March 17, 2009,
Public Hearing Date for Road Improvement Projects, South Garden Estates and Mirror
Lakes Neighborhood Street Reconstruction.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -27 APPROVED DECLARING "EDINA DAY OF SERVICE" Mr. Hughes
stated this initiative would involve Edina children in a day of community service on October 24,
2009. Member Brindle introduced Resolution No. 2009 -27 Declaring "Edina Day of Service
2009." Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
APPOINTMENTS MADE TO PARK BOARD, PLANNING COMMISSION AND
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Mayor Hovland thanked the Council members for their
assistance in conducting interviews of applicants to the Council advisory boards and commissions.
Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to appoint Jeff Carpenter to
the Planning Commission; Jennifer Kenney, Kathryn Peterson and Bill Lough to the Park
Board; and Usha Abramovitz to the Transportation Commission for three year terms ending
February 1, 2012.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
MEMBERSHIP APPROVED IN U.S. HIGHWAY 169 CORRIDOR COALITION Mr. Hughes stated
Edina received an invitation to join the Highway 169 Corridor Coalition. Mayor Hovland reported on
the formative meetings he attended and presented his strong recommendation to accept
membership and authorize payment of a $3,000 seed contribution. Member Housh made a
motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to authorize membership in the U.S. Highway 169
Corridor Coalition and authorize execution of the Joint Powers Agreement following the
City Attorney's review and with evaluation in six months.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Page 5
Minutes /Edina City Council /February 17, 2009
*TRAFFIC SAFETY MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 2009 ACCEPTED Motion made by Member
Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to accept the Traffic Safety Minutes of February
4, 2009.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by
Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated February 5, 2009, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund
$892,228.79; CDBG Fund $7,525.00; Communications Fund $3,950.63; Working Capital Fund
$9,084.20; Art Center Fund $4,677.93; Golf Dome Fund $2,213.46; Aquatic Center Fund
$4.79; Golf Course Fund $5,139.87; Ice Arena Fund $1,890.53; Edinborough /Centennial
Lakes Fund $56,569.83; Liquor Fund $137,824.23; Utility Fund $23,474.64; Recycling Fund
$75.00; PSTF Agency Fund $5,246.60; TOTAL $1,149,905.50 and for approval of payment of
claims dated February 12, 2009, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $290,081.59;
Communications Fund $3,615.34; Working Capital Fund $16,706.99; Art Center Fund
$5,841.84; Golf Dome Fund $1,666.05; Aquatic Center Fund $254.88; Golf Course Fund
$56,908.22; Ice Arena Fund $27,401.76; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $8,523.97;
Liquor Fund $230,451.60; Utility Fund $447,442.50; Storm Sewer Fund $2,684.20; PSTF
Agency Fund $9,172.01; TOTAL $1,100,750.95 and Credit Card Transactions dated
December 27, 2008 to January 26, 2009; TOTAL $2,618.41.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
MEMBER BENNETT APPOINTED — EDINA EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD Member Swanson
stated because she was now serving on the CAPSH Board, she would be leaving the Edina
Education Services Board and recommended the appointment of Member Bennett as her
replacement. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to appoint
Member Bennett to the Edina Education Services Board.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 3, 2009.
James C. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the February 17, 2009, meeting is available.
Page 6
MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 17, 2009
5:30 P.M.
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:38 p.m. in the Community Room of City
Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning
Director; Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner; Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager; Roger
Knutson, City Attorney; Elisa Hatlevig, Consultant Attorney; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk.
Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to discuss litigation between City of
Edina and JMS Home Builders, builder of the house at 6120 Brookview Avenue. At the
direction of the City Attorney, the meeting was not tape recorded.
The City Council, Mr. Knutson and Ms. Hatlevig discussed the various aspects of the
pending litigation.
Mr. Knutson left the meeting at 6:15 p.m.
There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra Mangen, City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE STUDY SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 24, 2009
11:30 A.M.
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 11:30 a.m. in the Community Room of City
Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh and Mayor Hovland.
Member Swenson was absent. Staff present included: Heather Worthington and Debra
Mangen, City Clerk.
Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to discuss the current
attendance policy of the City Council's Advisory Boards and Commissions, to review the
content of the City Council's minutes and to receive an update on the Con Agra site, which
is the potential site for a new Public Works facility.
The Council discussed the City's Code Section 180 governing Advisory Boards and
Commissions. Following the discussion consensus was to leave the code alone while
acknowledging that better communication between staff liaisons, !Boards and Commission
members and the City Council would be desirable.
The Council also discussed reformation of the Human Rights and Relations Commission.
After the City Attorney has reviewed potential changes to Code Section 140, it will be
placed on the Council's agenda for consideration.
Assistant Manager Worthington explained the reasons staff desire to simplify the content
of the Council's meeting minutes. Ms. Worthington and Clerk Mangen answered questions
of the Council regarding the minutes. It was explained the Granicus site on which the City's
meetings are web streamed and archived would be the verbatim record of each meeting
with a more summary version of the minutes kept as the official written record. Council's
consensus was to use the summarized version of the minutes as long as the minutes met
statute, were accurate, consistent and balanced.
Ms. Worthington briefed the Council on the status of the "No Action" letter received from
the Pollution Control Agency; the purchase price negotiations which were underway, and
the proposed timing of a bond sale for the site, noting the Council would consider calling
for a bond sale at their March 3, 2009, meeting and then sell the bonds March 17, 2009.
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 1:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra Mangen, City Clerk
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Cary Teague
Planning Director
KhFL)K'1/KLUL)MMt NVAt 1V1V
Agenda Item II.A.
Consent F1
Planning Commission Recommended Action:
On January 28, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City
Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for Edina Public
Schools to construct a maintenance building at 5701 Normandale Road. See the conditions of
approval within the attached resolution.
Inf ormation/B ackgroun d:
See attached Planning Commission report which includes the staff recommendation for
approval; the minutes and development plans.
Information Only
Date: March 3, 2009
Mgr. Recommends F�
To HRA
' ®
To Council
Subject: Conditional Use Permit to
build a maintenance building
Action
®
Motion
at 5701 Normandale Road.
F-1
Resolution
.
Deadline for a city decision: March 17, 2009
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
Planning Commission Recommended Action:
On January 28, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City
Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for Edina Public
Schools to construct a maintenance building at 5701 Normandale Road. See the conditions of
approval within the attached resolution.
Inf ormation/B ackgroun d:
See attached Planning Commission report which includes the staff recommendation for
approval; the minutes and development plans.
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-29
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A MAINTENTANCE BUILDING AT
5701 NORMANDALE ROAD FOR EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City Of Edina
Section 1. BACKGROUND.
1.01 The Edina Public Schools are proposing to build a 1,984 square foot maintenance and storage
building on the west side of the high school football field, near the entrance gate.
1.02 On January 28, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
conditional use permit request.
Section 2. FINDINGS
2.01 Approval is based on the following findings:
1. Per Section 850.04. Subd.4.E of the Zoning Ordinance, the proposal would meet the
required standards for conditional use permit as follows:
a. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be
detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare.
b. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages.
C. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other
property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance.
d. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of
other property in the vicinity.
e. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities.
f. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in
which it is located as imposed by this Section.
g. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Section 3. APPROVAL
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves
the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a maintenance building at 5701 Normandale
Road, subject to the following conditions:
The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans
and the conditions below:
• Site plan date stamped December 23, 2008.
City Hall .1- -b Y-1 -- --Y— -- -- 4801 WEST 50TH STREET Landscaping p lan date stamped December 23, 2008. FAX 952-826-0390
0
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-29
Page Two
Building elevations date stamped December 23, 2008.
2. Record the approving resolution with the county.
3. The building must meet all applicable building permit requirements.
Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on March 3, 2009.
ATTEST:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of March 3, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009.
City Clerk
Planning Commission Meeting January 28, 2009
All Commissioners were present.
2008.0009.09A Conditional Use Permit
Edina School District
5701 Normandale Road
Construct New Maintenance Building
Planner Presentation`/
Planner Teague informed the Commission the Edina Public Schools are
proposing to build a 1,984 square foot maintenance and storage building on the
west side of the high school football field, near the,elntrance gate. Continuing,
Based on the comments of the Planning Commission, the'shed has-been
relocated from the originally requested Iodation, which was adjacent,to the
exisitng tennis courts on Concord Avenue. The, School- District liad considered
locating the building off site, at Creel�,Valley Park, however,, decided that it would
not be an efficient location. Equipment would have to�be hauled greater
distances, at greater expense to the School District, thanfrom the proposed site.
Planner Teague further explained that this request - requires a conditional use
permit. Concluding, Planner--Teague stated staff recommends that the City
Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build a metal accessory building
at 5701 Normandale Roa&for Edina.Public Schools based on the following
findings:
1. The p oposal meets'the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section
850..04 8ubd.'4.E, of the,Edina Zoning Ordinance.
2. f The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements.
to the following conditions:
1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the
following plans.and the/conditions below:
•~ `-, Site plan date stamped December 23, 2008.
• Grading plan date stamped December 23, 2008.
• Landscaping plan date stamped December 23, 2008.
• Building elevations date stamped December 23, 2008.
2. Record the approving resolution with the county.
3. The building must meet all applicable building permit requirements.
Appearing for the Applicant
Jay Willemssen and Peyton Robb, Edina Public Schools and Karen Sutherland.
Applicant Presentation
Mr. Willemssen addressed the Commission and explained the school district did
consider locating the maintenance building at the Creek Valley school site;
however, the primary utilization of the maintenance building would be to serve
the South View campus. Mr. Willemssen added with budget restraints this
location made the most sense. Continuing, Mr. Willemssen said'the proposed
building would house small and large mowers, snow removal equipment, sand,
salt and vehicles. Mr. Willemssen said the building will be heated to facilitate
repair of machines, etc.
Comments and Questions from the Conimission
Commissioners raised the following questions /concerns:
• Will the color of the new maintenance,building match the other field
buildings —
• Is there a reason for the boxy shape of the building —
• Can the building be positioned to be more in line,with the other buildings—
Can the maintenance building be pushed back-,
ack to eliminate the gap
between the building.wall and the fence — the rear of the proposed
building could create an,attractive nuisance —
In response to their questions Commissioners were informed:
•
The color of the new maintenance building will be green to match the
existing field buildings.
• The,boxy shape of the new building best suits the square footage of the
building.to accommodate,the storage of equipment and vehicles.
• The location of the new building provides safer vehicle access off the
parking lot. It was pointed out if the proposed building was'positioned to
line up with the other'buildings it wouldn't easily fit.
• With regardjo creating an attractive nuisance for kids to congregate
behind the building between the building and fence the district indicated
their willingness to add a light -pack in that area.
2
Commission Action
Commissioner Grabiel asked the school district to take another look at the
landscaping proposed for the maintenance building and suggested larger
plantings.
Commissioner Grabiel also noted that previously the
before the Commission requesting a Conditional USE
maintenance building on the east side of district�pr6F
that meeting Commissioners suggested that the dish
maintenance building near the football field. Commis
district for complying with .that suggestion. ��� "I
Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend,/Cond
approval based on staff findings and subject,to sta
district appeared
to construct a
)ncord Avenue). At
xate "the proposed
r.Grabiel thanN
y \
nal Use Perm
Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. All vote
carried.
aye;
3
w9SA,r�
o� a
0
0
• N�bllea.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Originator
Meeting Date
Agenda #
Cary Teague
January 28, 2008
2008- 009.08a
Director of Planning
INFORMATION & BACKGROUND
Project Description
The Edina Public Schools are proposing to build a 1,984 square foot
maintenance and storage building on the west side of the high school football
field, near the entrance gate. (See location on page Al —A2.)
Based on the comments of the Planning Commission, the shed has been
relocated from the originally requested location, which was adjacent to the
exisitng tennis courts on Concord Avenue. (See previous location on page A3.)
The School District had considered locating the building off site, at Creek Valley
Park, however, decided that it would not be an efficient location. Equipment
would have to be hauled greater distances, at greater expense to the School
District, than from the proposed site.
The request requires a conditional use permit. (See the proposed plans on pages
A4 —A10. )
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Edina Community Center
Easterly: The Edina football & soccer field and track
Southerly: Single- family homes & Concord Elementary School: zoned and
guided low- density residential
Westerly: Highway 100.
Existing Site Features
The existing 28 acres contain the South View Middle School; the Edina
Community Center; athletic facilities for Edina Schools including tennis courts,
baseball and softball field a football /soccer field with a track; and three large
parking fields. (See page A2.)
Planning
Guide Plan designation:
Zoning:
Building Design /Landscaping
Public /Semi - public
R -1, Single- dwelling district
As shown on the attached building elevations, the building would be a green
metal building with a tan metal roof and doors. The building colors would be
similar to existing storage sheds located on this site. (See pages A1 Oa—
Al 0d.) (See photo simulation of what the building would look like on the site
on page A10e.)
The applicant is proposing to plant two Norway Spruce and eleven Rushmore
Arborvitae to provide year round screening of the shed from residents to the
south. (See page A6 and A1 0e.)
Grading & Drainage
The city.engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and
finds them.acceptable.
Conditional Use Permit
Per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, the City Council shall not grant a Conditional
Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation
of the use:
1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be
detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare;
The new accessory building would not be detrimental to the site. The use
on the site would remain the same. The building simply provides indoor
storage and repair area for school equipment.
2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking
shortages;
There would be no increase in traffic or need for additional parking.
3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value,
of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance;
The new building would not be injurious to the use of the site, would not
decrease property values in the vicinity or cause a nuisance as defined in
2
Edina's nuisance ordinance. The new building would be green to match
existing storage sheds in the area, so as to blend into the site better than
the previously proposed building. (See page A4.) With the exception of
color, the proposed building is similar to others located at the following
Edina Public Schools: Countryside; Highlands; Cornelia; and Creek
Valley. (See pages Al 1 —Al 6.)
The applicant is also proposing to plant two Norway Spruce and eleven
Rushmore Arborvitae to provide year round screening of the shed from
residents to the south. (See page A6 and A1 0e.)
4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of other property in the vicinity;
The building would not impede development of property in the area.
5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other
public facilities;
The building would not generate any traffic or increase usage of school
facilities, therefore, would not create a burden on parks, street or other
public facilities.
6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the
district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and
The proposal meets all other Zoning Ordinance requirements.
7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Accessory buildings are conditionally permitted within the R -1 zoning
district; therefore, the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3
Compliance Table
PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION
Primary Issue
• Is the proposed new building reasonable for this site?
Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons:
1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated
on pages 2 -3 of this report the seven findings for a conditional use permit
would be met.
2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. All setback
requirements would be met. (See page 3 of this report.)
3. The proposed building would be the colors as existing accessory buildings
on site, and similar to others located at the following Edina Public Schools:
Countryside; Highlands; Cornelia; and Creek Valley.
4. The structure would be partially screened by two Spruce trees and eleven
Arborvitaes.
4
City Standard
Proposed
Front — Normandale Road
50-feet
200+ feet
Side Steet — Southview Lane
50 feet
500+ fee
Rear — Concord Ave.
50 feet
800+ feet
Side — South
50 feet
125 feet to City water tower
site; & 425 feet to nearest
residential property
Building Height
30 feet
18 feet (20' 8" to the ridge line)
Over -story Trees
128 trees required
242 trees existing on the site
(number is based on the
perimeter of the site)
PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION
Primary Issue
• Is the proposed new building reasonable for this site?
Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons:
1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated
on pages 2 -3 of this report the seven findings for a conditional use permit
would be met.
2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. All setback
requirements would be met. (See page 3 of this report.)
3. The proposed building would be the colors as existing accessory buildings
on site, and similar to others located at the following Edina Public Schools:
Countryside; Highlands; Cornelia; and Creek Valley.
4. The structure would be partially screened by two Spruce trees and eleven
Arborvitaes.
4
Staff Recommendation
Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build a
metal accessory building at 5701 Normandale Road for Edina Public Schools.
Approval is based on the following findings:
1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section
850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the
following plans and the conditions below:
Site plan date stamped December 23, 2008.
Grading plan date stamped December 23, 2008.
® Landscaping plan date stamped December 23, 2008.
Building elevations date stamped December 23, 2008.
2. Record the approving resolution with the county.
3. The building must meet all applicable building permit requirements.
Deadline for a city decision: March 17, 2009
5
5072 5020 SOT2
5028 5016 SOOa
7
9109 3105 Sri 5041 5037 5025 507 7 501 J SODS
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5057 5010 503E 5026 SON 5016 5008 24
5049 -5032-L- 50203012_500411
15605 - 3 5021 5017 3009 5005
15605 2a 504111 50251301J.JTI�J r
'.3609r ! 1 1 5018 \5016 5012 SI004 I`
50�
'37/7 57'7 JiT21
5020 50253009
sit 2-
/ x773 5126
621( .i S 6021
5� $729 5700 r's078 U
ss:s
57;8 oa6
1174 511,
'5r20 'ICI 1�1 __ 58x5, 1 `
555l 12� T,708s
5 56117J 00 115511f00) 0 1 5�01
I fs�d 208 v 9 }
�
> m
56,7
57215117 51W 58[9 58}6 5621. a
5itz 51045100 181a511p 58�
7_ 17 5021 >.1
5,1' 5108 sozd1 .sers .
s721sn7�s7D9 s6i+1 "�]58sc6a
5112 I10t 5Bz9 24 03
1 ss00 `sD J 2' e
$176 �^
1� 5901 590! 5905] 2
5725 SfI 1 51109 I 1 590 5908 159E 0�1
6007 6000 6001 6000 60016000 6007 3023 5009 3005
600560a SODS 6006 r"1 l
6008 60096C06 6009 6004 6003 5020 5016
TI
4600450[0.506 4502 4500 54015400-
I I I
6009 ��
,_16017 6075 6012 6073 60721 5024
60'36D1,6 6017 6016 6017 61001 �1� SU04
5w
l_ HlDhliahted Feature
6021670/1 6105�L U
i et00� ?016700 61001567081 610150165�f2
5pl. a10561066f67f1; 6/1_50207/
5206
6109 6708 6109 6116 I J 5021
677.7 6111 6117 6120 50281 ,�
P
72755205
1-11=6176 6117 5 /00 j�/ /5025 6100
52M 61256, 5033 61
$
S15t
51
)0 asoa 54.1 5424
.� ... �.c 61J76T29.37167510a05� 6109
.!
!�
e ay_
d V L•
� d
ai LJ
5701
City of Edina
4529462'
4525 4617
I 53]2 3776
Legend
TI
4600450[0.506 4502 4500 54015400-
I I I
l_ HlDhliahted Feature
5409
Nauss Numhor L-ahels
`300]
1, 6511 45094503 4507 I
57 }754 }7
4506 4302 4500
Street Name labels
City Lim its
)0 asoa 54.1 5424
.!
!�
e51a -LIJ
542954]]
if 4509 4507 0507 4501 l� -x.76
•! CraOkc
4511 1 1 1 1 1 5417
Lak9 Names
4600 4514 4516 4504 4500 55015500
4506450211
5505 5509
rE
rFFFr
Lakes
Parks
x5'74513 509450,545
1
660111 1 1507 450J -557. 5517
}? 5525 cr 55214525
❑ parcOls
5281516
5241 I SS7i SSSI
x15 --LSD, 5600 ssolrs6w E
360 15609_
264570 561]56061
74.4516 20 5617 1V.
—r —'050} 5637 d
525 4517 ( 5515 7�
521 sea
043764511 3655 0
i 565
1
4 s
s71i4sos s7110
S7a
7 }2, 5706 5704 14 15
57fa $71],6712 4421441a
5720 5717,5776
5724 57215720 4414 x476
J1 5725 5754 1 20n
:800 58015806 5501..... r
5900 5n�r sect_' .5845- '.c,L-->- ^=s64f1_ .-, 5641
5444 -5x45 5&15
/ 56013900 39013900 T 39015900 59015900
55 5909 5908 5905905 5904 -5905 5909
6810 5913 5917 -597] 3 b917 597 -5917 5 757 PIT-S913 5917
^'--1 1 5920 5975
5921 5925 -5921 5929 5929 59216675 '59215125
470094 705 3929 5 ➢3] '5233'241 �- 7`+426 5933 -5920 5977
G 597: 5941 5033 5977 �59J7_5937 594t
716470a 3977'5940
TL 470I�5903.L_5�5�59L/ 555 5944 -53 5940
T4825 a214a7] 11801 47174717 70'a 51707 �O1 6000 6001 fi0001 6001 6000 6DOt 6000 60056000
4826 4809 6000 I Lg041� 6005 600E 6005 600'4 6005 6001 6009 6001 6008 �Oa
1828 4620 I-600d w054 t 6005 8009.600a a009,60081 6009 6000, 6009 5006 6017 6016
aoa 0096008 8006. 017- 60'316V I y10 }36012 6p7J1�4
4E04 1121 '0;3 012 6077 'Wi2' 801727 601716016 �•1�602 -6023
4800 1716'' 6016 6016 6016 ' 1 :�_ 6037
73 1837 GB29 4716 6772 6017 ,Fw'�7} 6010 1021 tw204 6021, 0021 6029
1477 Gd25 It80 517 1700 L 6025 28021 X6025 60J7 6011
4801 '11 1610 '0 1603E / 1
6101 / 721'4717 / 4624.x16 4012!_601 6029 1G 015 BOG[
61 D1 6 7967121 61096107 47'12 ti10�G629 6100 1608 B026 6077 3 7 2 Z! 2l -6104
6116 6117 617761`00804 61056700, 6116Tj6700
PID:1902824230001
5701 Norrnandale Rd
Edina, MN 55424
_` llll,M
l�l
'r ►. sa,� se,s
r[ 4 !
5616 b617
i -
lea
SA
IT
FF
i
1
rrr•.+ Err 1,'
qb
\�
r
A
k
t
> 4813 48P3 4805 4801
I r
4811 e 4808 4804 14 C'00
r
A
k
t
Citv of Edina
• (
` asf• n sr.
f
5611,. aan ae7sr
i ! .:.,� .
.o�y
a
3618 1. 8616
61
,8611. 5617 b6H
5619
yam' G
5627
'�tt"Nh
i��
� e . �•,._ ,_ �
/i
1619
T-7; f ' Piltr 6("
!
5705
f Ott, rb•n!;
— I Me
vi
8630
- t IlrIM
Nrn7��M-
5711
!Gro
y
I
w
94
r.
X811
100
°' •• j.
_ • =.�`
SBOS
58041
tj
tf
>
c w ! AI
se09
-.$112
sere
4
t'
`5
5817
5821
5816
5870
Cj
c 1i
\ti' \
.
5815
5874
r'1
A
�_•
_�...1,5-
3828
28
r,
x1
5837
5832
r
�lra.a ve
r.,._._.. .._..
4
,5649
ftr
1R
; '
r .;:o C.
S837 36
58<0
t 5811 .,
!
T
5874
} I
3.r
` IC8
.i Ilk
C'4 58TH 37
7212 x608 1805 NO1
5909
,, .xsasans
5905
/812 aeon 4B1I 1800 1771,
.� 4810
pry
59113
5917
I
o PID:1902824230001
5701 Normandale Rd
Edina, MN 55424
Oar
Legend
House Number Labels
Street Name Labels
A/ City Limits
Creeks
EJLake Names
— Lakes
LParks
❑ Parcels
2006 Aerial Photo
PRE \3 103 S
S ITE
N
WEST
EAST
49' -6'
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
'=1
man
�a
R
SOUTH
NORTH
40' -0"
V)
a
B�� C
La
�I
1
(n J sI
Z3. g
`S 3 i�-
w
a
i
F
li
i
fi
5g
F
wrl
u 1
h WEST SOUTH
RM
��
l=am
EAST NORTH
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
11 ,,.,.,
16 BUILDING FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS 9 SATE PLAN
rai CD
AREA OF
LOCATION PLAN WORK
4 ,•.. sam+ vExr NDDLE sclera
\ f \
PERKINS
+WILL
mIu► PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
PACRMM
e�awo wnerMM
eerwiui
p!#
T-.,
Fm
s
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE PLAN &
FLOOR PLAN
ELEVATIONS
\- 050 -ECC
rr r..r
f
Iii
Lo
.f
+
AREA OF
LOCATION PLAN WORK
4 ,•.. sam+ vExr NDDLE sclera
\ f \
PERKINS
+WILL
mIu► PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
PACRMM
e�awo wnerMM
eerwiui
p!#
T-.,
Fm
s
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE PLAN &
FLOOR PLAN
ELEVATIONS
\- 050 -ECC
rr r..r
LJ
o
ALIGN CURB C "
WITH EXISTING R
6�LURB TAPER
RE-STRIPE STALLS d.•
;� AS REQUIRED
Al
I JI
I
I'
I I
I
\ 1
\ 1
\ 1
\
\ \ 1
6' CURB TAPER
ALIGN CURB
WITH EXISTING
I,I
ALIGN DRIVE
WITH EDGE " \\ \ j .,\ \C;, {
�` OF STOOP \ f/
-OD-
0,
NN
O j•�\ a'd� �lj.\
'ate 4��. �, S,S• Ry V• i�': \ ik _ ` \
SOD rr;• \ �`
�4IY�ya
'��OIGIDpS ` SOD
o-
' �•r
o + \
2 -PA d � •
� 11\
J,.
------- - - - - --
4 -TO
1
APPROXIMATE LIMITS
OF SODDING
app.
I
I �
4 -TO
W
PROPOSED CONCRETE ALK/SLAB
- - - - --7 i
NOTES
/
FACE OF CURB OR, EDGE
SCIENTIFIC NAME
/
SIZE
OF PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
CONIFEROUS TREES
/ , 1
=n
\-I^ T
PLANT SCHEDULE
W
PROPOSED CONCRETE ALK/SLAB
NOTES
G
FACE OF CURB OR, EDGE
SCIENTIFIC NAME
1. ALL APPLICABLE DIMENSIONS ARE TO
SIZE
OF PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
CONIFEROUS TREES
Z. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME
BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
PA
NORWAY SPRUCE
3. ENGINEER/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECT AND
GRADING BEFORE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS
2
APPROVE FINISH
WITH SODDING.
B&B
4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE SODDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
\�
�., . \\ \\
\\
6. BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SODDING,
\ \ ` ` \\
N
REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR PROCEDURE.
,)\yL `. \' \'•
6. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL
•`\, `\ �\ '.
INFORMATION.
Th\Ije occidentelis'Rushnlore
11
#7
coot.
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
LEGEND
CL HEDGE COTONEASTER
Cetoneasto lucidus
PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
=n
\-I^ T
PLANT SCHEDULE
W
PROPOSED CONCRETE ALK/SLAB
G
SYMBOL I COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
OTY.
SIZE
ROOT
CONIFEROUS TREES
APPROXIMATE SODDED AREA
PA
NORWAY SPRUCE
Picea abies
2
5' -
B&B
CONIFEROUS SHRUBS
TO
RUSHMORE ARBORVITAE
Th\Ije occidentelis'Rushnlore
11
#7
coot.
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
CL HEDGE COTONEASTER
Cetoneasto lucidus
S
#5
coat.
I
I L
C
W
PROPOSED CONCRETE ALK/SLAB
G
PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE
�O
PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SHRUB
APPROXIMATE SODDED AREA
0 15 30
'
a
a
W
S=
N
r
r
V
Vl J
z J
z y 33
a s
f
iingm
N
® "
b
Rftn
ko
4
a
F------------------------- --- -- - - - - -�
I
I
10' WIDE BY 12' HIGH
s
OVERHEAD COILING DOOR
BY BUILDING MANUFACTURER
I
I I
j
3' -0' WIDE BY T -O' HIGH
i
o I I HOLLOW METAL DOOR W/ 2' HOLLOW META FRAME
I I HARDWARE GROUP 106
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
DASH LINE INDICATES
ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE
I i
L- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
49' -6' t
N Jlp
Z -i
IX r_
w
a.
FLOOR PLAN
EDGE OF CONCRETE \ \ \ \
� CONCRETE TO
.�
REMAIN
_ CENTER 10• -0' WIDE BY \'
12'-0' HIGH OVERHEAD •`•\ • . ':\
DOOR OPENING ON NEW
10'-0' WIDE CONCRETE \
DRIVE
NEW CURB CUT IN E)asm - �• �\
CURB \
6,0 EXISTING CHAIN'.
LINK FENCE TO.,
RnM
16'16' CONC. APRO
KEEP SANE & NNENT AS
EXISTING IWTAL BURDINGS TD - `1I ..
THE NORTH NEW\{VIAINT EXISTING B'S
VERIFY LOCATION OF CaMG - ' \ PAVA TO R N
TELEPHONE \
UIR11Y AND \ BLDG
REI.00ATE V' REQUIRED
DASHLDIE INDICATES ROOF \ \ /
NEW LANDSCAPING - SEE \ EXISTING DISCUS
LANDSCAPING PLAN �PADS•TO RENNN
NORTH
(I
SITE PLAN
1' = 20' -0'
PERKINS
WILL
�O�
wao�aaa. mo
Y/�,.t
�wmco
m
I �
0 VJR
e.d.
Use Permit App.
.we
1
A- 050 -ECC
rg-w
E
o
r �4
cQ ,
r LL.
9132
CENTERUNE
OF SWALE. 2' -
------ SWALEBO=COM-
r - - - --
r-
I I
\ I
I I
I I
I I
\ I
I
I\ II
\
LEGEND
H!0.80 X909
904.8 G
r
�J
z N
1 V
Z
Q
It
F2
0
y
gigg= as
�G
a �e�
3 �@
�,�,III
VI J
Z J �
Y. 3 rill
+
w a
a 8
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
_
--13.3
ME - MATCH ELEVATION
\\�
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
H!0.80 X909
904.8 G
r
�J
z N
1 V
Z
Q
It
F2
0
y
gigg= as
�G
a �e�
3 �@
�,�,III
VI J
Z J �
Y. 3 rill
+
w a
a 8
m
G ?%7
Lird-
. — — . — ' = .gin= .VII J� •I�-:I I 4I �� '.i� � / . /SSi �`\ , v \ \� � `•�' \` 1'. , � \ .,
F
iii � `•vim v
?
�� f
NMI I
p�tF ai g�g ��g
[ �Ese4 A t o 6 9g m
ol
holies r-
�
0
Y..�- �—��"'�'''°,` °. �'4�da`�",�._.- . - - �•��' -= —".woo - - _ ,� �� -- - - - _ _
all
'jar" 's - - - - * - ..� =ice`— ''�"���i -!�►Y n..- .��s�`..�,a*t
b
s�+
a ,
.� - .a- - -.. � ��.ti„ -.• _ %,��� CrF� .ti _ _ °irr•� �... -� � h '��. s�l�ly',�v+a�Tn
�.x.a. -:.. _' .:a= �'Y" -�..- - •�_ °.,. ... - ' ° ,.! �".. - .�..',- _ '�'�"C fir.... _ . �'.- a �^ . �. �. `abtF � t` - •'�k '-'•a
__ _ - .. - -
- - -- -
- �-•
�.
� _ _ r _4- - : - _ _ - - _ .
-� ._w_ - _ _._._ � . -
-- _.:� �-
a r -� - '.. _ _ fir. � - .r- _ � - , �. � _ - _ �¢M�= _� le,.�.:. ��'
�, - - _, . ra - _ _
_ � _
- - � - _ - - -
l _ - - - _ T - I. _ _ _ _ _
..�-
- .�
�� - -
-•}�- 'y ..� yam' i ���' *�.•ti.yT. ,.
M-t�
wr I -W
V
aUIL(lAi
L oc6-r ti
p fly
i
i
Ike
in
Q
q*
V
V
W
O
N
r.
N J dg
Z J3t
— 8
Y � s
L1!
a.
rJj 1
-- - -.m,
..A.-
t. ,. 1 •. ,. .�_ yip .. .
M
+ fi •.i ,��.a .Ti N(�{''i'`i"�= �77''�j1:y�,`,,�y
COT
y
IIN
'Y
`r
+
frjf�� J
.r 7
-- - -.m,
..A.-
t. ,. 1 •. ,. .�_ yip .. .
M
+ fi •.i ,��.a .Ti N(�{''i'`i"�= �77''�j1:y�,`,,�y
COT
lilt
T
f
JA
T
4f..-
4
Si
1.4
gtwnr
71,
/sill
-77
fs
IT,
'Wow"
T
� 1
1 �
r •rw 44 /, j
\��*Y fit`: ;a : wM'.'ys; "�� •�i 1 - c� - � � r
Yr .
1
�iau,AAos
;t
PA RAJ CA a A
Ilk
i�C
1
1
Jackie Hoogenakker =,
From: BLlacono @aol.com
)nt: Monday, March 02, 2009 11:32 PM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Edina Public Schools Conditional Use Permit
Mayor Hovland and City Council Members,
As 15 -year residents at 4813 W. 59th Street, we wish to express our opposition to the application by Edina Public Schools for a
Conditional Use Permit to erect a maintenance and storage building on the Community Center Campus. Our opposition is
based on three main points: 1) the proposed use will not promote the general public welfare and could endanger public health
and safety, 2) the proposed use will likely cause undue traffic hazards, congestion, and parking shortages, and 3) the proposed
use will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of and decrease the value of our and our neighbors' property and will likely be a
nuisance.
The general public welfare will not be enhanced by the construction of a maintenance building in the proposed location. The
School District has not been forthcoming with specifics of its planned use, but presumably, the needs are currently being met
elsewhere. If there was a valid need to replace the "hut" that was in place prior to all the construction that occurred a few years
ago at the Campus, it would seem that the need would have been addressed in the very comprehensive planning and
review process that went into that construction. The maintenance building will likely endanger public health and safety by the
introduction of equipment maintenance operations and traffic into the middle of a school /athletic campus and adjacent to a
residential neighborhood. The placement of the building will also provide a shield from public view for any activity that occurs
on the stadium side of the building, which is the exact path that numerous elementary school students travel twice a day
between Concord School and Wise Guys at the Community Center.
The placement of the maintenance building at that location will cause undue traffic hazards, congestion, and parking shortages
in an area that has previously been identified as having traffic, congestion, and safety problems. With nearly constant vehicle
1 pedestrian traffic for school, arts, athletic, and community events at that exact location, the addition of more and frequent
istrial and equipment traffic is an accident waiting to happen.
Finally, the construction and use of a maintenance building will be injurious to the use and enjoyment and cause a decrease in
the value of our property. The School District has not shared specifics of the planned frequency and extent of use, and we fear
the worst with regard to fumes, noise, and general disruption to our normally quiet neighborhood. The ugly metal construction
is inconsistent with a residential neighborhood and will be a terrible view out of our front windows. Just because the School
started a trend of building ugly metal buildings doesn't mean that it should be continued. It's not yet been disclosed whether a
"portapotty" will be erected with the building, but we assume there's a strong likelihood, and it's a definite concern for us. It's
ironic and frustrating that the same Planning Commission that expressed concern about the view residents on Concord Avenue
would have if the building was constructed at the original proposed site near South View Middle School and opposed the
construction of an ugly metal maintenance building in the Interlachen neighborhood had no qualms about imposing the view on
our neighborhood. The really frustrating part is that an alternative site behind the Creek Valley skating rink that was out of view
of any residences was proposed by the Planning Commission but rejected by the School District as "inconvenient." It is our
view that any perceived inconvenience (again, it seems the School District is able to function perfectly well without the building)
is outweighed by the traffic, safety, and nuisance issues a metal maintenance building would create in the Community Center
Campus and our peaceful residential neighborhood.
We respectfully request that you do not grant the Conditional Use Permit.
Thank you.
Beth and David Iacono
4813 W. 59th Street
Edina MN 55424
952 - 929 -4487
,ed a job? Find employment help in your area.
3/3/2009
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: pjlarson1 @comcast.net
nt: Saturday, January 17, 2009 12:28 PM
o: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Maintenance and Storage Building
Good Morning,
I am writing regard the "pole barn" that you are planning on building near Kuhlman Field. I believe that this
location is not appropriate for several reasons. First and foremost it will bring additional traffic to the parking
lot. This parking lot is extremely busy as it is and adding your "maintenance shed" will just increase the
volume of traffic. This is a school parking lot not only used by the parents of Normandale but also the
Family Center where parents are walking their small children to and from school. You have elementary and
middle school students walking to and from school through that area and the increased traffic and the city
vehicles coming and going will ultimately affect their safety. This should be your number one reason for
finding a better location. The fact that when I'm out in our front yard or looking out my window the only thing
that I'll see is a 2000 square foot shed!! This building is as big as my house. This would not be something
that I, nor my neighbors, would find aesthetically pleasing to the eye!! It will definitely decrease the value of
my home, affect re -sale and re -sale value. If I wanted a pole barn in my front yard I would move to the
country. This is a busy area in Edina and located just off Highway 100, do you really want people's first
impression of our community to be of a pole barn ? ?? There has to be another location available in a non -
lential area. I don't think a residential and school campus is the appropriate location for a maintenance
J. I know we wouldn't even being having this conversation if you were thinking of putting it up in the
Country Club, Indian Hills or Braemar neighborhoods because, of course, we wouldn't do that to our affluent
residents. Would you want this shed in your front yard? It seems when ever the planning commission has
no idea what to do with something they pin point my neighborhood. You have already lied to us once with
the water treatment project where "we'd never even know it was there because it would all be underground"
have you driven by and looked at that nightmare ?? Two cinder block access areas, with ugly mental "thing -
a-majigs" sticking out of the ground, an un- sightly wooden enclosure on the corner, the fact that they never
fixed the landscaping around that area and city trucks driving all over the grassy area leaving a muddy,
ruddy mess!! And you wonder why we don't trust your judgement?
I beg you to re -think this notion of a POLE BARN in this area, honestly ask yourselves, would you allow this
atrocity to be built in your neighborhood ? ?? I think we all know the answer to that question!!
Please feel free to contact me regarding this matter.
Pamela Larson
4805 West 59th Street
Edina, MN 55424
612- 805 -7417
1/20/2009
Yte
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
@ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: March 3, 2009
AGENDA ITEM: IV. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2009 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4X4 Pick Up Truck — Park Maintenance Department
DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED: BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE:
NA 2010
Company
Car /Truck City
(State Bid Contract #440137)
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Car/Truck City $22,072.00
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $22,072.00
ACCOUNT #:
1650.6710
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of a 2009 Chevrolet Silverado model 1500 extended cab, 4X4 %2 ton pick up truck for
the Park Maintenance Department. This vehicle will replace pick up truck #47.288, a similar 1998 4X43/4
ton pick up truck that will be sent to public auction this fall. We typically trade -in the pick up trucks every
seven years; however, this 1998 3/4 ton pick up truck has been well maintained but is now 1.1 years old and
in need of replacement. It is being replaced with a smaller (' /z ton vs. 3/4 ton) pick up that is a Flexfuel
vehicle in an effort to be more energy efficient. This purchase is funded by the equipment replacement
budget and is being purchased under the Minnesota State Bid Contract #440137.
John
Director
This Recommended bid is
within budget
Edina Park and Recreation
Dep ent
not within budget An Wallin, Finance Director
City Man
Gordon Hughes, ' er
0� e
roAPORA�v-
ieee
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: March 3, 2009
AGENDA ITEM: IV. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2009 Jacobsen Rotary Mower — Edina Park Maintenance Department
DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED:
February 17, 2009
Company
Turfwerks
(State Contract #440431)
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Turfwerks $71,299.62
BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE:
April 17, 2009
Amount of Quote or Bid
L$71,299.62
ACCOUNT #:
1650.6710
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase and delivery of a Jacobsen HR9016 rotary mower used to mow the large turf areas and
athletic fields in Edina's parks. This 2009 Jacobsen rotary mower replaces a similar 1994 Jacobsen
HR5111 rotary mower which we are given a $5,000.00 deduction in trade -in value. This type of heavily
used large grass cutting equipment is typically replaced every ten years; however, we have kept the mower
well maintained and delayed the replacement purchase for the past five years. The purchase price of
$71,299.62 includes sales tax and the $5,000.00 allowance for trade -in. It is being purchased under the
State Contract bid #440431 and is funded by the equipment replacement budget.
John Kepy?b% Director
This Recommended bid is
within budget
not within b
Edina Park and Recreation
Department- k
allin/Finarke Director
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: March 3, 2009
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Articulated Loader.
DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED
December 29, 2008
Company
1. St. Joseph Equipment (State Contract #432520) .
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
St. Joseph Equipment
AGENDA ITEM IV. C.
BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE
March 31, 2009
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 184,029.87
$ 184,029.87
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for a new articulated loader will replace a 1996 articulated loader - Unit
#25.463, which will be sold at auction. This purchase is through the State of Minnesota
Purchasing Program and will be funded through the Public Works Equipment Replacement
n pa--;—!-e'i
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Public Works — Streets
Department
not within budget J n Wallin, Finance Director
Gordon Hughes, City ManagtW
G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRPW\RFP - Loaders\20090403 rfp loader.doc
o e
1 �y 0
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
' ,^ see
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: March 3, 2009 AGENDA ITEM IV. D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One -Ton Truck Cab / Chassis
DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED
February 16, 2009
.Company.
1. Car Truck City
2. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Car Truck City
BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE
March 31, 2009
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 21,542.32
$ 21,796.29
$ 21,542.32
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for a Chevrolet CC30903: one -ton truck cab/ chassis, for the street
department -sign shop. It will replace a 1999 one -ton truck — Unit #25.320, which will be sold at
auction. The box for this truck will be purchased separately. This purchase will be funded
through the Public Works Equipment Replacement Budget.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
not within budge
Public Works — Streets
_Pepart,ment
t J n Wallin, Finance Director
Gordon Hughes, City Mana r
G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRPW \RFP - Trucks\20090403 rfp one ton truck.doc
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item # V.A.
From: John Wallin
Consent ❑
Finance Director
Information Only ❑
Date: March 3, 2009
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject: Morningside Water Rate
Action ❑
Motion
Report
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
®
Discussion
Recommendation:
Discuss the Morningside water rate draft.
Info /Background:
Attached is a second draft of a study to, determine the amount to charge the users of
Minneapolis water (the Morningside Area) for administrative, maintenance and capital
costs. City staff have met with staff from the City of Minneapolis concerning the rates
the City of Minneapolis charges the City of Edina for water purchased. As a result of
that meeting the City of Minneapolis is currently in the process of performing a rate
study to determine if Minneapolis would be willing to reduce the amount it charges
Edina for water purchased. Because there is a potential the rate charged by
Minneapolis could be lowered upon completion of the rate study, we recommend that
until Minneapolis determines whether to change Edina's water rate that we wait to
adjust the Morningside water rate.
The attached watermain analysis used the unaudited 2008 expenditure numbers for
estimating the portion of costs that would be allocated to watermain related costs
excluding storage, treatment and pumping costs. Different years could have different
proportions of where labor time and other costs are spent. Amounts can and will
fluctuate depending on numbers of watermain breaks and a number of other factors
that can be different from one year to the next. Our intent is to produce a conservative
estimate of the rate needed to cover these costs.
The recommendation for the infrastructure funding is to base that part of the rate on the
current Capital Asset Historical Cost as opposed to the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP). The watermain portion of all water related assets is 55 %. Compare this to the
current 2009 -2013. CIP which would equate to 30% of watermain related costs with
wells and treatment facilities taking up 70% of CIP costs. In contrast, the 2007 and
2008 bond issue funded project costs to date are weighted 70% to watermain projects.
With the 2 new well and treatment facilities in the 2009 -2013 CIP, the proportion of well
and treatment costs is much higher than historical cost or probable future costs. When
these new facilities are complete and the City returns to a higher allocation of
watermain projects associated with the street reconstruction program I would expect the
percentages of CIP projects to again resemble the Capital Asset Historical Cost
.. X
Memo
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Finance Department
Date: March 3, 2009
Re: Morningside water rates
History and Introduction
The Momingside area of Edina has always been connected to the Minneapolis water system. Edina pays
Minneapolis for all the water that crosses the border at a rate set by Minneapolis, which was $2.84 per 100 cubic
feet (unit) in 2008. Edina owns and maintains all water infrastructure located in the Momingside area, which
consists mostly of watermains and meters. Edina also provides all the administrative services associated with
water service, including meter reading, billing and payment processing, and service orders.
Edina charges Momingside water users a fixed quarterly meter charge and a usage charge of $0.02 per unit of
consumption above the Minneapolis rate. There is no tiered rate in the Momingside area like there is in the rest
of Edina. The meter charges and the usage charges are Edina's only water revenue in the Momingside area and
therefore should be designed cover the administrative and infrastructure costs already described.
The idea of studying Momingside rates was introduced in January of 2008 as part of the discussion of the 2008
rate study. At that time the Council directed the Finance Department to study the Momingside rate issue together
with the 2009 rate study. The Finance Department studied Momingside rates in conjunction with the 2009 rate
study and presented the results to Council in January 2009. The methodology used for this study was an attempt
to specifically identify individual costs related to the Momingside area and calculate a per -unit charge for each
cost. The resulting recommendation was that the Momingside consumption charge should be increased from
$0.02 per unit to $0.21 per unit.
Council indicated staff's analysis was well done but asked that additional work be done. Specifically, the Council
asked staff to perform additional analysis of the history and cost of water utility capital projects and the relative
percentage of capital costs related to the system components shared citywide. Therefore, this methodology of
the rate study starts with citywide utility expenses and then pulls out the pieces that are shared by the
Momingside area. This is a contrast from the original methodology of specifically identifying Momingside costs
and several differences are the result.
Citywide Expense Analysis
Administrative costs include meter reading, billing and payment processing, and service orders. The citywide
budget for administrative costs was $436,403 according to the rate study. Based on annual consumption of
about 3.1 million units of water, our administrative costs are estimated to about $0.14 system -wide.
Water utility maintenance costs are significant and include a wide variety of costs. Examples of costs include
contracts for watermain repairs, staff time and materials for in -house maintenance, vehicles and equipment,
water treatment, purchased water, etc. Some of these costs are directly related to watermains and meters
(distribution), some are partially related to distribution, and others are not related to distribution at all. We
categorized all maintenance costs into these three categories and assigned allocation percentages of 100 %,
50 %, and 0 %, respectively, to estimate how much of these costs are related to distribution. Citywide costs for the
100% distribution category were $0.12 per unit, citywide costs for the 50% category were $0.24 per unit, and
citywide costs for the 0% category were $0.46 per unit. Therefore, the total citywide water utility maintenance
costs are $0.82, the portion associated with distribution is estimated to be $0.24 per unit.
Infrastructure costs include wells, buildings, distribution, towers, and treatment. We feel it is not appropriate to
study infrastructure costs over a relatively short timeframe of 5-10 years as we do in the CIP or rate study
because infrastructure has a very long life and a short study timeframe can significantly skew results. The most
comprehensive and useful data can be found in our capital asset records, which date back 50-60 years, are
based on actual costs instead of estimates, and are audited annually by our outside auditors. According to these
records, distribution assets are about 55% of our total infrastructure assets. Citywide costs for infrastructure are
$0.69 per unit. Therefore, the portion of this cost related to distribution is $0.38.
Summary and Conclusion
When added up, the total estimated costs for the Morningside area outlined above are $0.76. Morningside meter
charges cover about $0.42 of this cost. Therefore, based on the revised methodology a per unit consumption
rate of $0.34 would be necessary to cover the remaining costs.
Minneapolis has notified Edina that their charges will also be increasing in 2009 to $3.00 per unit from $2.84 per
unit in 2008. Therefore Morningside water users would see an increase from $2.86 per unit in 2008 to $3.34 per
unit in 2009 under this proposal. The average Morningside user would see their total quarterly water
consumption bill increase by about $14 over current rates. About $5 of the increase will be paid directly to
Minneapolis to cover their rate increase, with Edina using the other $9 to pay for services.
While this increase appears large at first, it is actually smaller than the water rate increases the rest of Edina has
seen since we started the current version of rate studies in 2007. From 2006 to 2009, the water rate for the first
tier of usage has increased 22% for most Edina water users, and this increase would be much higher if tiers 2
and 3 were considered. In contrast, rates for the Morningside area will increase only 21% over the same time
period even if rates are adopted as proposed.
We believe a 2009 consumption rate of $0.34 per unit for the Momingside area will be adequate to cover all
costs in a manner that is fair to all our users. In addition, we recommend that this analysis should become part of
the regular utility rate study so that these estimates are revisited periodically and updated for changes in
consumption, inflation and other changes.
Citywide Costs
Admin
Maintenance
100% Distribution
50% Distribution
0% Distribution
Capital
Total
Morningside Rate Study
Exhibit 1
Cost
per Unit
Cost
per Unit
Morningside Proposed Costs
$
0.14
Admin $
0.14
Maintenance
$
0.12
100% Distribution $
0.12
$
0.24
50% Distribution $
0.12
$
0.46
0% Distribution $
-
$
0.69
Capital $
0.38
$
1.65
Total $
0.76
10
City of Edina
Watermain Analysis 2008 Expenditures
allocated to cost per unit
expenditures watermains
Water distribution expenses directly allocated to watermains
Watermain repairs contracted repairs
196,959
196,959
Asphalt
33,124
33,124
Concrete
4,740
4,740
Repair parts watermain
23,868
23,868
Sod
1,474
1,474
Water purchased less water sold
111,433
111,433
Gopher State One Call
371,598
371,598 0.119
Water distribution expenses 50% allocated to watermains
Salaries and benefits
488,861
244,431
Professional services
39,835
19,918
Other repairs
20,410
10,205
General supplies
40,811
20,406
Repair parts
13,990
6,995
Safety equipment
5,039
2,520
Gopher State One Call
14,152
7,076
Equipment operation
111,324
55,662
Training
3,069
1,535
Laundry
3,966
1,983
126,633
741,457
370,729 0.118
Water distribution expenses other than watermain
Water treatment
511,175
n/a
Water report
23,953
n/a
' umps
371,458
n/a
\ ouses
108,600
n/a
Tanks Towers & Reservoirs
157,073
n/a
Water sold
206,479
n/a
Distribution depreciation
398,268
n/a
Water distribution not watermain
-
n/a
eg: electricity, heat,phone
418,351
n/a
6,839
2,195,357
9,870
126,633
3,308,412
-
* based on 3,131,952 units of 100 cubic feet sold in 2008 for all of Edina
City of Edina
Water Utility Capital Asset Historical Cost
As of 12/31/08
Wells /Pumps
Buildings
Distribution
Towers
Treatment
Total
Land
-
-
-
21,070
-
21,070
Buildings
-
1,031,498
-
-
-
1,031,498
Furniture
-
6,839
-
-
-
6,839
Equipment
9,870
126,633
153,918
-
82,022
372,443
3,421,414
-
17,563,952
3,789,203
3,528,853
28,303,422
mcture
2,612,296
-
-
-
-
2,612,296
6,043,580
1,164,970
17,717,870
3,810,273
3,610,875
32,347,568
19%
4%
55%
12%
11%
100%
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: City Council
Agenda Item V.B.
From: James B. Hovland
Consent ❑
Mayor
Information Only ❑
Date: March 3, 2009
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject: Appointment to Park Board
®
Motion
Action
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Endorse Mayor's recommendation for appointment as presented.
Info /Background:
Following our last meeting, one of the Park Board Appointees, Kathryn Peterson, informed us
that upon further consideration she did not feel that she could make the time commitment
necessary to be an effective Board member, so she declined our appointment. After
consultation with the other Council members who participated in the interviews, I am
recommending Keeya Steel to appointed to the open position on the Park Board for a term
ending February 1, 2012.
Y16
Dip-qIWAMP-10ir
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: RENEWALS - ON -SALE
INTOXICATING, ON -SALE
CLUB AND SUNDAY SALE
LIQUOR LICENSES
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item V.C.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
Action
Recommendation
Council approval of Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor License renewals for:
On -Sale Intoxicating & Sunday Sale
Romano's Macaroni Grill
Big Bowl Cafe
Ruby Tuesday
California Pizza Kitchen
Salut Bar Americain
Crave Restaurant
Tejas
Eden Avenue Grill
The Cheesecake Factory
Edina Grill Restaurant
Westin Edina Galleria..
Kozy's Steaks and Seafood
Via Cafe and Bar
Lake Shore Grill
McCormick & Schmick's Seafood Restaurant
Club & Sunday Sale
Maggiano's Restaurant & Bakery
Edina Country Club
P.F. Chang's Bistro
Interlachen Country Club
To HRA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Info /Background:
Applications for renewal of On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -sale and Sunday On -Sale Liquor
Licenses for the above listed establishments have been reviewed by the Edina Police
Department and renewals are recommended per the attached memo. All applicants submitted
all required paperwork in accordance with the City's ordinance and State Statutes, and paid
their license fees.
Once Council approves the licenses, staff will forward them to the Minnesota Liquor Control for
state approval.
10 IN
Memo
To: Chief of Police Mike Siitari Z/?
From: Sergeant Scott Kuyper ( Retyp by Lynn Olson per Chief Siitari.)
Date: February 26, 2009
Re: Liquor License Renewals
Background checks have been completed for the 2009 -2010 licensing period for the following liquor
licenses:
On -sale Intoxicating and Sunday, Club on Sale and Sunday Sale, Wine and 3.2 Beer, 3.2 beer On -Sale
and 3.2 Beer Off -Sale.
The following restaurants and country clubs comply with City code. An unqualified recommendation for
approval of these renewal applications is warranted.
ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE
■ Big Bowl
■ California Pizza Kitchen
■ Crave Restaurant
■ Eden Avenue Grill
■ Edina Grill Restaurant
■ Kozy's Steaks and Seafood
■ Lake Shore Grill
■ Maggiano's Little Italy
■ McCormick & Schmick's
■ P.F. Chang's China Bistro
■ Romano's Macaroni Grill
■ Ruby Tuesday
■ Salut Bar American
■ Tejas
■ The Cheesecake Factory
■ Via Caf6 & Bar
■ Westin Edina Galleria
WINE AND 3.2 BEER ON -SALE
■ Beaujo's
■ Chapati
■ Chipotle Mexican Grill
1 • Page
/" 4t
■ Crooks of Crocus Hill
■ Good Earth Restaurant
■ Marriott Residence Inn
■ Noodles & Company
BEER 3.2 ON-SALE
■ Davanni's Pizza/Hoagie
■ T J's Family Restaurant
■ Chuck E Cheese's
BEER 3.2 OFF-SALE
■ Cub Foods
■ Holiday Station Store #217
■
Jerry Foods
■ Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC
CLUB ON-SALE AND SUNDAY SALE
■ Edina Country Club
■ Interlachen Country Club
2 • Page
'mot5 r
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE
RENEWALS
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item V.D.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Council approval of On -Sale Wine and On -Sale 3.2 Beer License renewals for the following
restaurants:
Beaujo's
Chapatti's
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Cook's of Crocus Hill
Good Earth Restaurant
Marriott Residence Inn
Noodles & Company
Info /Background:
The City received applications for On -Sale Wine and 3.2 On -Sale Beer Liquor Licenses from
the above listed establishments. Approval of both the above mentioned licenses allows these
establishments to also sell strong beer in their restaurants. Attached please find a .memo
reporting the results of the Police Department's investigation and review. The above applicants
submitted their renewal documentation pursuant to Edina's Code and State Statute, and paid
their license fees. Our renewal date is April 1, 2009 Once Council approves the licenses, staff
will forward them to the Minnesota Liquor Control for state approval.
Two licensees, D'Amico & Sons and Dino's Gyros of Edina Inc., have not completed their
alcohol awareness training. Once we receive their completed paperwork and have completed
our review, we will place the license on the Council's agenda for consideration. The licensees
have been advised that they will most likely have an interruption in their wine and beer licenses.
One licensee Chuck E Cheese dropped their wine license during late 2008.
Memo
To: Chief of Police Mike Siitari
From: Sergeant Scott Kuyper ( Retyp by Lynn Olson per Chief Siitari.)
Date: February 26, 2009
Re: Liquor License Renewals
Background checks have been completed for the 2009 -2010 licensing period for the following liquor
licenses:
On -sale Intoxicating and Sunday, Club on Sale and Sunday Sale, Wine and 3.2 Beer, 3.2 beer On -Sale
and 3.2 Beer Off -Sale.
The following restaurants and country clubs comply with City code. An unqualified recommendation for
approval of these renewal applications is warranted.
ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE
• Big Bowl
■ Califomia Pizza Kitchen
■ Crave Restaurant
■ Eden Avenue Grill
■ Edina Grill Restaurant
■ Kozy's Steaks and Seafood
■ Lake Shore Grill
■ Maggiano's Little Italy
■ McCormick & Schmick's
■ P.F. Chang's China Bistro
■ Romano's Macaroni Grill
■ Ruby Tuesday
■ Salut Bar American
■ Tejas
■ The Cheesecake Factory
■
Via Caf6 & Bar
■ Westin Edina Galleria
WINE AND 3.2 BEER ON-SALE
■ Beaujo's
■ Chapati
■ Chipotle Mexican Grill
1 • Page
M
■ Crooks of Crocus Hill
■ Good Earth Restaurant
■ Marriott Residence Inn
■ Noodles & Company
BEER 3.2 ON -SALE
■ Davanni's Pizza/Hoagie
■ T J's Family Restaurant
■ Chuck E Cheese's
BEER 3.2 OFF-SALE
■ Cub Foods
■ Holiday Station Store #217
•
Jerry Foods
■ Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC
CLUB ON-SALE AND SUNDAY SALE
■ Edina Country Club
■ Interlachen Country Club
2 • Page
f} . . t
8116
r� -- --
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: 3.2 BEER LICENSE
RENEWALS
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item V. E.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Council approve issuance of 3.2 Beer licenses as listed below:
Info /Background:
City Code Section 900 requires the City Council approve beer licenses before issuance.
The following applicants have submitted the necessary documentation for renewal, paid
the applicable fees, and been approved by the Police Department. Our renewal date is
April 1, 2009. Once Council approves the licenses, staff will forward them to the
Minnesota Liquor Control for state approval.
Staff submits these licenses for Council consideration:
On -Sale 3.2 Licenses
Chuck E. Cheese
Davanni's Pizza /Hoagies
TJ's Family Restaurant
Off -Sale 3.2 Licenses
Cub Foods
Holiday Stationstore #217
Jerry's Foods
Speedway Superamerica LLC
Memo
To: Chief of Police Mike Siitari 2/' c
From: Sergeant Scott Kuyper ( Retyp by Lynn Olson per Chief Siitari.)
Date: February 26, 2009
Re: Liquor License Renewals
Background checks have been completed for the 2009 -2010 licensing period for the following liquor
licenses:
On -sale Intoxicating and Sunday, Club on Sale and Sunday Sale, Wine and 3.2 Beer, 3.2 beer On-Sale
and 3.2 Beer Off -Sale.
The following restaurants and country clubs comply with City code. An unqualified recommendation for
approval of these renewal applications is warranted.
ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE
■ Big Bowl
■ California Pizza Kitchen
■ Crave Restaurant
■ Eden Avenue Grill
■ Edina Grill Restaurant
■ Kozy's Steaks and Seafood
■ Lake Shore Grill
■ Maggiano's Little Italy
■ McCormick & Schmick's
■ P.F. Chang's China Bistro
■ Romano's Macaroni Grill
■ Ruby Tuesday
■ Salut Bar American
■ Tejas
■ The Cheesecake Factory
■
Via Cafe & Bar
■ Westin Edina Galleria
WINE AND 3.2 BEER ON-SALE
■ Beaujo's
■ Chapati
■ Chipotle Mexican Grill
1 • Page
4� . , 4
■ Crooks of Crocus Hill
■ Good Earth Restaurant
■ Marriott Residence Inn
■ Noodles & Company
BEER 3.2 ON-SALE
■ Davanni's Pizza/Hoagie
■ T J's Family Restaurant
■ Chuck E Cheese's
BEER 3.2 OFF-SALE
■ Cub Foods
■ Holiday Station Store #217
■
Jerry Foods
■ Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC
CLUB ON -SALE AND SUNDAY SALE
■ Edina Country Club
■ Interlachen Country Club
2 • Page
J
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item V.
F.
Consent
From: Cary Teague
Planning Director
Information Only
Date: March 3, 2009
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject: Metropolitan Livable
Communities Act Grant
Action ®
Motion
Agreement.
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommended Action:
Enter into the Metropolitan Council Sub -grant Agreement with WP Development LLC, to allow
the City to control the funds received from the Met Council for a Livable Communities Act Tax
Base Revitalization Grant for the Gateway redevelopment project.
Information/Background
Attached is the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement, in which the City
will receive $317,400. These monies are to be used for the investigation and clean -up of
redevelopment sites within the Gateway redevelopment project.
In this specific case, the funds would be for the investigation costs and clean up of the phase
one development (a -Loft Hotel) at Pentagon Park, for the demolition of the two westerly
Pentagon Park Tower wing buildings at 7701 and 7703 West 77th Street Edina. The prunary
materials that will be cleaned up prior to demolition are asbestos, floor tile and mastic. These
materials are found throughout the buildings due to the age (1960 -1970) construction and the
materials that where used at that time. The developer has hired Nova Consulting Group to
perform the testing and clean up.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SUBGRANT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made as of , 2009, by and between WP
DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Developer "), and the CITY
OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City').
RECITALS
1. Developer plans to construct a hotel on certain property located in the City of
Edina, Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" ( "Subject Property "); and
2. City has entered into a grant agreement whereby grant funds are made available
for asbestos abatement on the Subject Property: Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant
Agreement, Grant Number SGO08 -131 ( "Grant Agreement "). A copy of the Grant Agreement is
attached hereto as Exhibit `B ".
3. City agrees to provide the grant proceeds to the Developer, subject to compliance
with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
4. Developer agrees to accept the grant proceeds to be used for asbestos abatement
on the Subject Property, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as
the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract
between the parties as if they were set out verbatim and in full herein:
A. This Agreement.
B. Grant Agreement.
In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, this Agreement shall
control in resolving any such conflicts.
2. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS. Provided Developer is in compliance with the terms
of this Agreement and the Grant Agreement, City shall disburse grant funds to Developer
pursuant to the terms of the Grant Agreement, to the extent the grant funds are received by City
and City is authorized to release the grant funds to Developer.
14372001 1
RNK:02/03/2009
3. DEVELOPER'S OBLIGATIONS.
A. As the subgrantee under the Grant Agreement, Developer shall comply
fully with each and every clause set forth in the Grant Agreement and applicable state and
federal laws. To the extent assignable, City hereby assigns to Developer, as such subgrantee, all
claims that City may have against Grantor under the Grant Agreement for the Grantor's failure to
fulfill their obligations pursuant to the terms of the Grant Agreement.
B. Developer shall perform all affirmative obligations that City is obligated
to perform under the terms of the Grant Agreement, including but not limited to provisions
related to accounting, reporting, subcontracting, audit, and inspection, and payment of all costs;
provided, however, that such affirmative obligations shall not include any that, by its nature, can
only be performed by a governmental agency; however, in such case, Developer shall be
required to reimburse City for City's costs incurred in performing its obligations to Grantor
under the Grant Agreement.
C. Developer shall immediately reimburse to City all, or any portion of, grant
proceeds provided under this Agreement, if required by Grantor under the Grant Agreement or in
the event of a violation of this Agreement or the Grant Agreement requiring such reimbursement.
4. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. Developer agrees to
indemnify and hold City, its agents and employees harmless, from any claims or causes of action
arising from the performance or nonperformance of this Agreement or the Grant Agreement by
City or City's agents or employees. In addition, Developer shall reimburse City for any costs,
including reasonable attorney's fees, it may incur as a result of any such claims.
5. WAIVER. If either party waives any breach of this Agreement by the other, such
waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Agreement by
either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition, or obligation.
6. GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the
interpretation of this Agreement.
7. SEVERABILITY. If any provision, term, or condition of this Agreement is
found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not effect the remaining provisions,
terms, and conditions of this Agreement, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term, or
condition renders this Agreement impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the
parties' entire agreement.
8. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the
parties and is a final, complete, and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes
and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings, or written or verbal representations made
between the parties with respect thereto.
14372001 2
RNK:02/03/2009
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto as
of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF EDINA
Lo
James Hovland, Mayor
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
WP DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Lo
143720v01
RNK:02/03/2009
Its
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description of Subiect Property
Tracts A,B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County
Minnesota.
143720vOl 4
RNK:02/03 /2009
EXHIBIT "B"
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement
143720vOl
RNK:02/03/2009
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
GRANTEE: City of Edina
GRANT NO. SGO08 -131
PROJECT: Pentagon Park Hotel
GRANT AMOUNT: $317,400.00
FUNDING CYCLE: Fall 2008
COUNCIL ACTION: January 14, 2009
EXPIRATION DATE: December 31, 2010
METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT
GRANT AGREEMENT
THIS GRANT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into by the Metropolitan
Council ( "Council ") and the Municipality or Development Authority identified above as "Grantee."
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.251 creates the Metropolitan Livable Communities
Fund, the uses of which fund must be consistent with and promote the purposes of the Metropolitan
Livable Communities Act ( "LCA ") and the policies of the Council's Metropolitan Development
Guide; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.251 and 473.252 establish within the Metropolitan
Livable Communities Fund a Tax Base Revitalization Account and require the Council to use the
funds in the account to make grants to Municipalities or Development Authorities for the cleanup of
polluted land in the seven - county metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee is a Municipality or a Development Authority as defined in Minnesota
Statutes section 473.252, subdivisions 1 and 1 a; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee seeks funding in connection with an application for Tax Base
Revitalization Account funds submitted in response to the Council's notice of availability of grant
funds for the "Funding Cycle" identified above and will use the grant funds made available under
this Agreement to help fund the "Project" identified in the application; and
WHEREAS, the Council awarded Tax Base Revitalization Account grant funds to the Grantee
subject to the Council's eminent domain policy and any terms, conditions or clarifications stated in
its Council Action, and with the understanding that the Project identified in the application will
proceed to completion in a timely manner and all grant funds will be expended prior to the "Expiration
Date" identified above.
NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above statements and in consideration of the mutual
promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the Grantee and the Council agree as follows:
Page I of 11 Pages
a
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
I. DEFINITIONS
1.01 Definition of Terms. The terms defined in this paragraph have the meanings given them in
this paragraph unless otherwise provided or indicated by the context.
(a) Cleanup Costs or Costs. "Cleanup Costs" or "Costs" means:
(1) For hazardous waste or substance contamination, the cost of implementing a
voluntary response action plan approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
under Minnesota Statutes section I I5B.175, subdivision 3.
(2) For asbestos contamination, the cost of implementing a project - specific asbestos
project plan for the Site and performing asbestos - related work which is carried out by
contractors or subcontractors licensed or certified by the Commissioner of Health
under the Minnesota Asbestos Abatement Act, Minnesota Statutes sections 326.70 to
326.81, in accordance with rules prescribed by the Commissioner of Health related to
asbestos abatement and asbestos management activity, and meeting the federal
Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act ( "AHERA ") standards for asbestos.
(3) For petroleum contamination, the cost of implementing a corrective action plan for
the Site approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under Minnesota Statutes
chapter I I5C.
(4) For lead abatement, the cost of lead abatement work performed by certified
contractors consistent with all applicable federal and state laws, rules and standards
governing lead abatement or regulated lead work on residential or commercial
properties.
(b) Council Action. "Council Action" means the action or decision of the governing body of
the Metropolitan Council, on the meeting date identified at Page 1 of this Agreement, by
which the Grantee was awarded Tax Base Revitalization Account grant funds.
(c) Development Authority. "Development Authority" means a statutory or home rule charter
city, a housing and redevelopment authority, an economic development authority, or a port
authority in the metropolitan area as defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121,
subdivision 2.
(d) Municipality. "Municipality" means a statutory or home rule charter city or town
participating in the Local Housing Incentives Program under Minnesota Statutes section
473.254, or a county in the metropolitan area as defined by Minnesota Statutes section
473.121, subdivision 2.
(e) Participating Municipality. "Participating Municipality" means a statutory or home rule
charter city or town, that has elected to participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account
program and negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the Municipality pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes section 473.254.
Page 2 of 11 Pages
TAX BASL REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
(f) Project. Unless clearly indicated otherwise by the context of a specific provision of this
Agreement, "Project" means the development or redevelopment project identified in the
application for Tax Base Revitalization Account funds for which grant funds were requested.
Grant- funded activities typically are components of the Project.
(g) Project Costs. "Project Costs" means all costs as defined in Minnesota Statutes section
116J.552, subdivision 7.
(h) Site. "Site" means the polluted land proposed by the Grantee to be cleaned up and located
both within the metropolitan area and within a Participating Municipality.
H. GRANT FUNDS
2.01 Total Grant Amount. The Council will grant to the Grantee the "Grant Amount" identified
at Page 1 of this Agreement which shall be funds from the Tax Base Revitalization Account of the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
the Grantee understands and agrees that any reduction or termination of Tax Base Revitalization
Account funds made available to the Council may result in a like reduction in the Grant Amount
made available to the Grantee.
2.02 Authorized Use of Grant Funds. The Grant Amount made available to the Grantee under
this Agreement shall be used only for Cleanup Costs for the cleanup of the Site described in the
application for Tax Base Revitalization Account funds. A Project summary that identifies eligible
uses of the grant funds as approved by the Council is attached to and incorporated into this
Agreement as Attachment A. Grant funds must be used for cleanup of the Site which must be
located in a Participating Municipality. If consistent with the application and subject to the
limitations in Minnesota Statutes section 116J.556, the Grantee may use the grant funds to provide a
portion of the local match requirement for Project Costs that qualify for a grant under Minnesota
Statutes sections I I6J.551 to I I6J.557. Grant funds must be used for costs directly associated with
the specific proposed Project activities for which the grant funds were awarded and shall not be used
for "soft costs" such as: administrative overhead; travel expenses; legal fees; insurance; bonds;
permits, licenses or authorization fees; costs associated with preparing grant proposals or applications;
operating expenses; planning costs, including comprehensive planning costs; and prorated lease and
salary costs. Grant funds may not be used for costs of Project activities that occurred prior to the
grant award, unless the pre -award costs were for:
(a) Site investigation work that occurred within 180 days of the Funding Cycle application due
date and is identified as a grant - funded activity in Attachment A; or
(b) Project cleanup activities that occurred within 180 days of the Funding Cycle application due
date that were expressly approved by the Council Action and are identified in Attachment A.
Grant funds also shall not be used by the Grantee or others to supplant or replace: (a) grant or loan
funds obtained for the Project from other sources; or (b) Grantee contributions to the Project, including
financial assistance, real property or other resources of the Grantee. The Council shall bear no responsibility
Page 3 of 11 Pages
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
for cost overruns which may be incurred by the Grantee or others in the implementation or performance
of the Project activities. The Grantee agrees to comply with any. "business subsidy" requirements of
Minnesota Statutes sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 that apply to the Grantee's expenditures or uses of
the grant funds.
2.03 Project Changes. The Grantee must promptly inform the Council in writing of any
significant changes to the Project for which the grant funds were awarded, as well as any potential
changes to grant- funded activities described in Attachment A. Failure to inform the Council of any
significant changes to the Project or significant changes to grant - funded components of the Project,
and use of grant funds for ineligible or. unauthorized purposes, will jeopardize the Grantee's
eligibility for future LCA awards. Grant funds will not be disbursed prior to Council approval of
significant changes to either the Project or grant- funded activities described in Attachment A.
2.04 Eminent Domain Restrictions. On January 25, 2006 the Council adopted a policy that
restricted the use of LCA grant funds on projects when eminent domain authority was used to
acquire private property for "economic development" purposes in connection with the projects. The
Council's policy defined the term "economic development" for LCA program purposes and covers
the time period from January 25, 2006 to June 28, 2006. On June 28, 2006 the Council adopted a
revised eminent domain policy that is consistent with the statutory definitions and restrictions
contained in Minnesota Statutes chapter 117 as amended (effective May 20, 2006) during the 2006
legislative session. The revised policy applies to LCA grant awards and grant agreements made on
or after June 28, 2006. The Council's January 25, 2006 and June 28, 2006 eminent domain policies
are available online at: http: / /www.metrocouncil.orgl services/ livcomnlEminentDomainPolicy .htm.
(a) If a notice of petition was served between January 25, 2006 and May 20, 2006 in connection
with the Grantee's Project (or any component of the Project) for which grant funds were
awarded, the grant funds may not be used to fund or support the Project unless the Project:
(1) would have been eligible under the Council's January 25, 2006 policy; or (2) qualifies for
an exemption under Minnesota Statutes section 117.012, subdivision 3 or 2006 Minnesota
Laws chapter 214, section 22, clauses (b) through (e).
(b) If a notice of petition was served on or after May 20, 2006 in connection with the Grantee's
Project (or any component of the Project) for which grant funds were awarded, the grant
funds may not be used to fund or support the Project unless the Project qualifies for an
exemption under Minnesota Statutes section 117.012, subdivision 3 or 2006 Minnesota
Laws chapter 214, section 22, clauses (b) through (e).
2.05 Loss of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees to remit to the Council in a prompt manner: any
unspent grant funds, including any grant funds that are not expended prior to the Expiration Date
identified at Page 1 of this Agreement; any grant funds that are not used for the authorized purposes;
and any interest earnings described in Paragraph 2:07 that are not used for the purposes of
implementing the Project activities described in Attachment A. For the purposes of this Agreement,
grant funds are "expended" prior to the Expiration Date if the Grantee pays or is obligated to pay for
expenses of eligible Project activities that occurred prior to the Expiration Date and the eligible
expenses were incurred prior to the Expiration Date. Unspent or unused grant funds and other funds
Page 4 of 11 Pages
TAX BASE- REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
remitted to the Council shall revert to the Council's Tax Base Revitalization Account for distribution
through application processes in future Funding Cycles or as otherwise permitted by law.
2.06 Payment Request Forms and Disbursements. The Council will disburse grant funds in
response to written payment requests submitted by the Grantee and reviewed and approved by the
Council's authorized agent. Written payment requests shall be made using payment request forms, the
form and content of which will be determined by the Council. Payment request and other reporting
forms are available online at: http: / /www. metrocounciL org /servicesl7ivcomrWLCAresources. htm. The
Council will disburse grant funds on a reimbursement basis or a "cost incurred" basis. The Grantee
must provide with its written payment requests documentation that shows grant - funded Project
activities actually have been completed. Disbursements prior to the performance of a grant- funded
Project activity will be subject to terms and conditions mutually agreed to by the Council's
authorized agent and the Grantee. Subject to verification of each payment request form (and its
documentation) and approval for consistency with this Agreement, the Council will disburse a
requested amount to the Grantee within two (2) weeks after receipt of a properly completed payment
request form.
2.07 Interest Earnings. If the Grantee earns any interest or other income from the grant funds
received from the Council under this Agreement, the Grantee will use the interest earnings or
income only for the purposes of implementing the Project activities described in Attachment A.
2.08 Effect of Grant. Issuance of this grant neither implies any Council responsibility for the
contamination at the Site nor imposes any obligation on the Council to participate in the cleanup of
the Site contamination or in the Cleanup Costs beyond the Grant Amount of this Agreement. By
awarding grant funds to the Grantee for the Project and executing this Agreement, the Council
assumes no responsibility for: (a) any damage to persons, property, or the environment caused by Site
cleanup activities or implementation of the Project; or (b) determining whether intended uses of the
Site identified in the grant application or potential future uses of the Site, including any residential
uses, are suitable for the Site.
III. ACCOUNTING, AUDIT AND REPORT REQUIREMENTS
3.01 Accounting and Records. The Grantee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and
complete accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all grant funds received
from the Council. Notwithstanding the expiration and termination provisions of Paragraphs 5.01
and 5.02, such accounts and records shall be kept and maintained by the Grantee for a period of six
(6) years following the completion of the Project activities described in Attachment A or six (6)
years following the expenditure of the grant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Accounting methods
shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
3.02 Audits. The above accounts and records of the Grantee shall be audited in the same manner
as all other accounts and records of the Grantee are audited and may be audited or inspected on the
Grantee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by the
Council at any time, following reasonable notification to the Grantee, for a period of six (6) years
following the completion of the Project activities or six (6) years following the expenditure of the
grant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05,
Page 5 of 11 Pages
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
subdivision 5, the books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the
Grantee that are relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the Council and either the
Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years.
3.03 Report Requirements. The Grantee will report to the Council on the status of the Project
activities described in Attachment A and the expenditures of the grant funds. Submission of properly
completed payment request forms (with proper documentation) required under Paragraph 2.06 will
constitute periodic status reports. The Grantee also must complete and submit to the Council a grant
activity closeout report. The closeout report form must be submitted with the final payment request
form or within 120 days after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs
earlier. Within 120 days after the Expiration Date, the Grantee must complete and submit to the
Council a certification of expenditures of funds form signed by the Grantee's chief financial officer
or finance director. The form and content of the closeout report and certification form will be
determined by the Council. In addition to the periodic status reports, the grant activity closeout
report, and the certification form, the Grantee must submit to the Council by April 1 of the year
following the expiration of this Agreement and by April 1 of each of the succeeding three (3) years,
an annual written report that includes information about redevelopment activities, net tax capacity of
the Site, and jobs resulting from Site cleanup. The form and content of the annual written report
will be determined by the Council. The reporting requirements of Paragraphs 3.03 and 3.04 shall
survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
3.04 Certificate of Completion. Upon completion of the Site cleanup, the Grantee will provide
to the Council:
(a) For hazardous waste or substance contamination, a copy of a certificate of completion for the
Site issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
section 11513.175, or a letter from the Agency indicating that the approved voluntary
response action plan for the Site has been implemented to the satisfaction of the Agency and
that the Agency is issuing a determination that no further action is required under Minnesota
Statutes sections I I5B.01 to 115B.08 to address the identified release; or
(b) For asbestos contamination, either (i) a copy of a statement from the Grantee's licensed
asbestos abatement contractor that the project- specific asbestos project plan and asbestos -
related work for the Site have been completed in accordance with the rules of the Minnesota
Department of Health, or (ii) a final asbestos abatement implementation report that shows the
project - specific asbestos project plan and asbestos- related work for the Site have been
completed in accordance with the rules of the Minnesota Department of Health; or
(c) For petroleum contamination, a copy of a site closure letter issued by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapter 115C; or
(d) For lead abatement or regulated lead work, a copy of a statement or other documentation from
the certified contractor that the lead abatement or regulated lead work at the Site has been
completed in accordance with applicable federal and state laws, rules and standards governing
lead abatement.
Page 6 of 11 Pages
5
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
IV. RECOVERY AND REPAYMENT
4.01 Recovery of Funds. If the Grantee recovers funds pursuant to an action under Minnesota
Statutes section 11513.04, or other law, to recover the reasonable and necessary Project Costs incurred
to cleanup the Site, the Grantee shall repay to the Council that portion of the grant as provided in
Paragraph 4.04.
4.02 Assignment of Rights. Upon request of the Council, the Grantee shall assign to the Council
the Grantee's right to recover the funds described in Paragraph 4.01, shall prepare and submit a
certification of the Project Costs incurred, and shall cooperate in any cost recovery action brought by
the Council.
4.03 Expenses of Recovery. The reasonable litigation expenses or other costs of legal or
technical assistance incurred by the Grantee, the Council, or both, may be deducted from recovery
obtained in accordance with Paragraphs 4.01 or 4.02 and reimbursed to the entity incurring such
costs before proceeds of the recovery are distributed in accordance with Paragraph 4.04.
4.04 Reimbursement. Subject to the deduction provided in Paragraph 4.03, amounts recovered
either by the Grantee or the Council from responsible persons and all other amounts otherwise
received by the Grantee or the Council for cleanup of the Site shall be used to reimburse the Grantee,
the Council, or .any other nonresponsible party who contributed funds for cleanup of the Site in
proportion to their respective payments for response costs.
4.05 Survival of Recovery and Repayment Provisions. The provisions of Paragraphs 4.01
through 4.04 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
V. AGREEMENT TERM
5.01 Term. This Agreement is effective upon execution of the Agreement by the Council.
Unless terminated pursuant to Paragraph 5.02, this Agreement expires on the Expiration Date
identified at Page 1 of this Agreement and ALL GRANT FUNDS NOT EXPENDED BY THE
GRANTEE PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE SHALL REVERT TO THE COUNCIL.
5.02 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the Council for cause at any time upon
fourteen (14) calendar days' written notice to the Grantee. Cause shall mean a material breach of
this Agreement and any amendments of this Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated prior to the
Expiration Date, the Grantee shall receive payment on a pro rata basis for eligible Project activities
described in Attachment A that have been completed prior to the termination. Termination of this
Agreement does not alter the Council's authority to recover grant funds on the basis of a later audit
or other review, and does not alter the Grantee's obligation to return any grant funds due to the
Council as a result of later audits or corrections. If the Council determines the Grantee has failed to
comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable provisions of the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, the Council may take any action to protect the Council's
interests and may refuse to disburse additional grant funds and may require the Grantee to return all or
part of the grant funds already disbursed.
Page 7 of 11 Pages
IN
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
5.03 Amendments and Extensions. The Council and the Grantee may amend this Agreement by
mutual agreement. Amendments or extensions of this Agreement shall be effective only on the
execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and the Grantee.
The Expiration Date may be extended beyond the original Expiration Date identified at Page 1 of
this Agreement if, AT LEAST THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION
DATE, the Grantee's authorized representative submits a written extension request that: (a) states
the reason for the extension request; (b) identifies a new completion date, which shall not exceed
one year beyond the original Expiration Date; and (c) describes in reasonable detail any proposed
changes to the Project activities and budget. THE EXPIRATION DATE MAY BE EXTENDED ONLY
ONCE. THE PERIOD OF THE ONE -TIME EXTENSION SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE (1) YEAR
BEYOND THE ORIGINAL EXPIRATION DATE IDENTIFIED AT PAGE 1 OF THIS AGREEMENT.
Any additional extension requests from the Grantee must be approved by the governing body of the
Metropolitan Council.
VI. GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.01 Equal Opportunity. The Grantee agrees it will not discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status,
status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission,
disability, sexual orientation or age and will take affirmative action to insure applicants and employees
are treated equally with respect to all aspects of employment, rates of pay and other forms of
compensation, and selection for training.
6.02 Conflict of Interest. The members, officers and employees of the Grantee shall comply
with all applicable state statutory and regulatory conflict of interest laws and provisions.
6.03 Liability. Subject to the limitations provided in Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, to the
fullest extent permitted by law, the Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Council
and its members, employees and agents from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses,
including but not limited to attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from the conduct or
implementation of the Project activities funded by this grant, except to the extent the claims,
damages, losses and expenses arise from the Council's own negligence. Claims included in this
indemnification include, without limitation, any claims asserted pursuant to the Minnesota
Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA), Minnesota Statutes chapter 115B, the federal
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as
amended, United States Code, title 42, sections 9601 et seq., and the federal Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) as amended, United States Code, title 42, sections 6901 et seq.
This obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or otherwise reduce any other right or
obligation of indemnity which otherwise would exist between the Council and the Grantee. The
provisions of this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. This
indemnification shall not be construed as a waiver on the part of either the Grantee or the Council of
any immunities or limits on liability provided by Minnesota Statutes chapter 466 or other applicable
state or federal law.
6.04 Acknowledgments. The Grantee shall acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the
Council in promotional materials, press releases, reports and publications relating to the Project
Page 8 of 11 Pages
P6
TAX BASTE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
activities described in Attachment A which are funded in whole or in part with the grant funds. The
acknowledgment should contain the following language:
Financing for this project was provided by the Metropolitan Council
Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund.
Until the Project activities funded by this Agreement are completed, the Grantee shall ensure the
above acknowledgment language, or alternative language approved by the Council's authorized agent,
is included on all signs located at Project or construction sites that identify Project funding partners
or entities providing financial support for the Project.
6.05 Permits, Bonds and Approvals. The Council assumes no responsibility for obtaining any
applicable local, state or federal licenses,, permits, bonds, authorizations or approvals necessary to perform
or complete the Project activities described in Attachment A. The Grantee and its developer(s), if any,
must comply with all applicable licensing, permitting, bonding, authorization and approval requirements
of federal, state and local governmental and regulatory agencies, including conservation districts.
6.06 Subgrantees, Contractors and Subcontractors. The Grantee shall include in any
subgrant, contract or subcontract for Project activities appropriate provisions to ensure subgrantee,
contractor and subcontractor compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and this
Agreement. Along with such provisions, the Grantee shall require that contractors and
subcontractors performing work covered by this grant obtain all required permits, licenses and
certifications, and comply with all applicable state and federal Occupational Safety and Health Act
regulations, especially the federal Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response standards
under Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29, sections 1910.120 and 1926.65.
Stormwater Discharge and Water Management Plan Requirements. If any grant funds are used
for urban site redevelopment, the Grantee shall at such redevelopment site meet or require to be met
all applicable requirements of:
(a) Federal and state laws relating to stormwater discharges including, without limitation, any
applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, parts 122 and 123; and
(b) The Council's 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan and the local water
management plan for the jurisdiction within which the redevelopment site is located.
6.07 Authorized Agent. Payment request forms, written reports and correspondence submitted
to the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be directed to:
Metropolitan Council
Attn: LCA Grants Administration
390 Robert Street North
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1805
6.09 Non - Assignment. Minnesota Statutes section 473.252, subdivision 3 requires the Council
to distribute grant funds to eligible "municipalities," metropolitan-area counties or "development
Page 9 of 11 Pages
11
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
authorities" for projects in municipalities participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account
program. Accordingly, this Agreement is not assignable and shall not be assigned by the Grantee.
6.10 Warranty of Legal Capacity. The individuals signing this Agreement on behalf of the
Grantee and on behalf of the Council represent and .warrant on the Grantee's and the Council's
behalf respectively that the individuals are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on the Grantee's
and the Council's behalf respectively and that this Agreement constitutes the Grantee's and the
Council's valid, binding and enforceable agreements.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantee and the Council have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their duly authorized representatives. This Agreement is effective on the date of final execution
by the Council.
GRANTEE: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By: BY:
Guy Peterson, Director
Title: Community Development Division
Date: Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
TBRA SGO08 -131 Edina- Pentagon Park Hotel. Doc
Page 10 of I1 Pages
Revised 01112/09
fy
TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT
ATTACHMENT A
APPLICATION FOR TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT FUNDS
This attachment comprises this page and the succeeding page(s) which contain(s) a summary of the
Project identified in the application for Tax Base Revitalization Account grant funds submitted in
response to the Council's notice of availability of Tax Base Revitalization Account grant funds for
the Funding Cycle identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. The summary reflects the proposed
Project for which the Grantee was awarded grant funds by the Council Action, and may reflect
changes in Project funding sources, changes in funding amounts, or minor changes in the proposed
Project that occurred subsequent to application submission. The application is incorporated into this
Agreement by reference and is made a part of this Agreement as follows. If the application or any
provision in the application conflicts with or is inconsistent with the Council Action, other
provisions of this Agreement, or the Project summary contained in this Attachment A, the terms,
descriptions and dollar amounts reflected in the Council Action or contained in this Agreement and
the Project summary shall prevail. ,For the purposes of resolving conflicts or inconsistencies, the
order of precedence is: (1) the Council Action; (2) this Agreement; (3) the Project summary; and
(4) the grant application.
Page 11 of I1 Pages
0
PROJECT SUMMARY
Grantee City of Edina
Project Name: Pentagon Park Hotel
SG008 -131
Location:
4901 77`h St. West
Council District:
5 — Polly Bowles
Acres:
2 acres
Total Estimated
$396,787 for environmental investigation and asbestos abatement
Cleanup Cost:
Funding request:
$317,429 for asbestos abatement (Funding previously awarded includes $59,220 from
Hennepin County for environmental investigation.)
Private Investment:
$17,620,138
Increase in Net Tax
$296,243
Jobs:
128 FTE '
Affordable Housin
N/A
Project Summary
The applicant is requesting $317,429 in funding from TBRA for asbestos abatement
of two buildings on 2 acres of an 8 -acre site formerly used a multi - building office
complex. Expected benefits include the development of a Starwood Hotel. The
proposed redevelopment site was previously awarded $59,220 from Hennepin County
for environmental investigation.
The TBRA recommendation is $317,400, the full amount of the TBRA request. Funds
are to be used for asbestos abatement. (Removal of other hazardous or regulated
materials is not eligible for grant funding.)
Designation of Signing Authority for Reimbursement Requests for Metropolitan
Council Livable Communities Grants
Grantee: City of Edina
SG #: SGO08 -131
Fund: TBRA
Project name: Pentagon Park Hotel
The following individual(s) is /are authorized to certify Metropolitan Council Payment Request
Summary Sheets for the above - referenced project.
Name
Title
Mailing Address
Phone
Fax
Email
Date:
(Print or type name)
Title
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Heather Worthington
Assistant City Manager
Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: Authorize stipend for
Energy and Environment Commissioner
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item # V. G.
Consent
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize the payment of a $250.00 stipend for Hailey Lee, Energy and Environment
Commissioner, to attend the Powershift 2009 conference. The Energy and
Environment Commission voted unanimously to recommend that they grant this
stipend. All payments for out -of -state travel must be approved by the Council.
Info /Background:
Narrative from Hailey Lee:
In the last few years, Minnesota high schools, including Edina High, have done
numerous things to take actions for the environment. They include lobbying for the
Renewable Energy Standard and Clean Cars standard, meeting with the Governor and
testifying before state legislature on climate issues, taking an active role in opposing Big
Stone II, leading local sustainability projects, and most importantly, training each other
in grassroots organizing skills and creating a state -wide network that combines the
creative strength and power of students from across the state.
As of now, through an organization called YEA! MN, about 15 to 20 students from 9
high school across the Twin Cities Metro are working together to reach Power Shift
2009 in Washington DC from February 27th -March 2 "d. Over 10,000 youth from around
the country will gather there to learn new skills, strengthen bonds between diverse
youth constituencies, share ideas, make plans, establish a national voice for our
generation, and send a united message to Congress that we must use this opportunity
to revitalize our economy and combat climate change.
Workshops at the Power Shift include Lobby Day with Congress where students can
converse with legislators about the differences that they could make on behalf of our
environment, to youth -led workshops and seminars.
As an Edina Student, Resident, and Commissioner of the Environment and Energy
Conservation Committee, I am being supported and sponsored by Edina High School
and the Committee to attend Power Shift 2009 and represent Edina there. The number
one thing I hope to get out of the Power Shift is to gain as much knowledge about what
youth nationwide are doing to help the environment. I want to be prepared to return
home, ready to work on new projects stimulated by new knowledge and connections
that I have gained there —all the necessary tools needed for me to find the most
effective ways to channel my efforts. I am going to Power Shift to let Edina's voice be
heard on the national level.
CITY
NA
2 9 7:48:57
R55CKREC: G20000
Council Check
Register
Page- 1
2/18/2009 -
2/1912009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319365
2/18/2009
119010 MAGGIANO'S LITTLE ITALY
2,625.00
STATE OF THE COMMUNITY LUNCH
205794
021309
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
2,625.00
319366
2/19/2009
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
51.20
205545
0721824
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
40.64
205546
0721786
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
32.60
205547
0721823
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
44.00
205758
0721842
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
20.00
205759
0721843
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
188.44
319367
2/19/2009
105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES
42.60
ALARM SERVICE 00006202 205444
87051691
5420.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CLUB HOUSE
42.60
319368
2/19/2009
102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
408.91
READY MIX 00005752 205654
4239385
1322.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
408.91
319369
2/19/2009
102715 41LLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING
57.51
TABLE TENT PRINTING
205655
75164
5842.6575
PRINTING
YORK SELLING
57.51
319370
2/19/2009
120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC.
988.70
BOILER AND POOL DECK LIGHTING00002144 205656
5831
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
988.70
319371
2/19/2009
100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894
37,077.90
RECYCLING
205445
1653537
5952.6183
RECYCLING CHARGES
RECYCLING
37,077.90
319372
2/19/2009
103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC.
16.73
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
205657
ALERTINV11192
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
39.03
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
205658
ALERTINV11188
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
55.76
319373
2/1912009
101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
425.83
205388
105219400 -1/09
1470.6201
LAUNDRY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
170.32
205389
105905600 -1/09
1470.6201
LAUNDRY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
433.40
205390
100015147 -1/09
1551.6201
LAUNDRY
CITY HALL GENERAL
169.01
205391
103532024 -1/09
5841.6201
LAUNDRY'
YORK OCCUPANCY
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/18 /2009 7:48:57
Council Check Register
Page - 2
2/18/2009
-2/19/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
286.39
205392
103531424 -1/09
5861.6201
LAUNDRY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
57.01
205393
103533424 -1/09
5821.6201
LAUNDRY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
28.50
205446
101681311 -1/09
5421.6201
LAUNDRY
GRILL
103.34
205447
100369500 -1/09
5210.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
1,673.80
319374 2/19/2009
100665 AMSAN
30.76
CLEANER
00001411 205448
195285556
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
30.76
319375 211912009
102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
112.61
RADIO REPAIR
205659
7731
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
142.71
RADIO REPAIR
205660
7729
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
238.92
RADIO REPAIR
205661
7728
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
95.04
RADIO REPAIR
205662
7733
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
64.04
RADIO REPAIR
205663
7732
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
653.32
319376 2/1912009
121985 ARROW HOCKEY AND SPORT CORP
250.93
GRINDING WHEELS, DRESSERS
00002343 205449
0013318 -IN
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
250.93
319377 2/19/2009
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
26.40
205664
020109
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
40.27
205664
020109
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
48.74
205664
020109
5821.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
65.77
205664
020109
5210.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
73.11
205664
020109
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
89.51
205664
020109
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
90.17
205664
020109
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
98.37
205664
020109
1481.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK FIRE STATION
106.98
205664
020109
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
118.14
205664
020109
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
244.56
205664
020109
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
272.70
205664
020109
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
272.70
205664
020109
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
348.06
205664
020109
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
450.08
205664
020109
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CLUB HOUSE
586.17
205664
020109
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,931.73
319378 211912009
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
CITY .
NA
2 d 7:48:57
R55CKREG _jG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
2/1812009
-- 2/19/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
163.78
BATTERIES
205450
18- 231456
1401.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
42.58
BATTERIES
00003836 205665
18- 231603
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
206.36
319379
2/19/2009
102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
1,350.59
GOLF CART BATTERIES
00006394 205394.
C7961
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GOLF CARS
229.79
BATTERIES
00001871 205451
C8198
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
19.00-
CREDIT
205666
C8215
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,561.38
319380
2/1912009
116151 BCA - BTS
225.00
INTOXILYZER CLASS
205452
2098227
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
225.00
319381
2/19/2009
120517 BEITEL, DAWN
125.68
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
205667
020909
1622.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
SKATING & HOCKEY
125.68
319382
2/19/2009
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
73.41
.205548
81898500
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
94.96
205549
81881100
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,335.05
205550
47895600
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
726.03
205551
47800600
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
781.48
205552
47947800
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
530.90
205553
47947900
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5,541.83
319383
2/19/2009
100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
3,627.25
ASPHALT
00005750 205453
13286
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
3,627.25
319384
2/19/2009
122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
1,454.67
BOARDS
00003831 205668
47954
45008.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION
1,454.67
319385
2/19/2009
119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP
4,537.13
PROSECUTING - LUNSER
205669
39527
1195.6103
PROFESSIONAL-SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
15,150.00
PROSECUTING
205669
39527
1195.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
19,687.13
319386
2119/2009
105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
144.20
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003806 205670
87043152
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/18/2009 - 2119/2009
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1,303.88 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003806 205671 87042797 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES
5.83 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003742 205672 87043514 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES
319394 2119/2009 100681 CATCO
80.10 SEALS 00001542 205673 3 -67281
26.70 SEAL 00001542 205674 17 -14542
106.80
319395 2119/2009 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
REPAIR PARTS
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Page- 4
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AMBULANCE FEES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,453.91
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
319387
2119/2009
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
168.30
DIMMER SWITCHES 00001537
205454
269914
1553.6530
168.30
319388
2119/2009
101430 BROWNELLS INC.
591.95
RIFLE PROJECT
205455
05207189.00
1400.6710
591.95
319389
2119/2009
122195 BRUNSWICK ZONE - EDEN PRAIRIE
83.58
BOWLING FEES
205510
020709
1629.6406
83.58
319390
211912009
124005 BURKHOLDER, JOHN
100.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
205511
021109
1470.4329
100:00
319391
211912009
120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
18,436.64
LEGAL
205456
2851G -1/09
1195.6131
18,436.64
319392
211912009
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
195.55
205554
13364
5822.5514
12.35
205555
13363
5822.5515
2,477.70
205556
13370
5842.5514
52.15
205557
13371
5842.5515
2,737.75
319393
211912009
116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
118.18
205560
81075
5822.5513
518.00
205561
81074
5842.5513
319394 2119/2009 100681 CATCO
80.10 SEALS 00001542 205673 3 -67281
26.70 SEAL 00001542 205674 17 -14542
106.80
319395 2119/2009 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
REPAIR PARTS
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Page- 4
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AMBULANCE FEES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2 .9 7:48:57
Page - 5
Business Unit
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
YORK OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
MAINT OF COURSE $ GROUNDS
YORK FIRE STATION
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
WELL PUMPS
CLUB HOUSE
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
SENIOR CITIZENS
DISTRIBUTION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
134.95 205558 383659 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
562.50 205559 384378 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
319397
2/19/2009
CITY
NA
R55CKREG _jG20000
77.22
POWER FOR LIFTSTATION
205395
4006
Council Check Register
77.22
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
319398
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
369.50
205512
020309
5430.6186
HEAT
414.74
205512
020309
5841.6186
HEAT
458.72
205512
020309
5821.6186
HEAT
593.44
205512
020309
5861.6186
HEAT
708.98
205512
020309
5422.6186
HEAT
1,013.93
205512
020309
1481.6186
HEAT
1,719.72
205512
020309
5111.6186
HEAT
2,285.75
205512
020309
5911.6186
HEAT
2,481.18
205512
020309
5420.6186
HEAT
3,099.10
205512
020309
5630.6186
HEAT
3,639.38
205512
020309
1552.6186
HEAT
3,646.21
205512
020309
1628.6186
HEAT
4,974.63
205512
020309
5913.6186
HEAT
7,399.51
205512
020309
1646.6186
HEAT
14,906.33
205512
020309
5511.6186
HEAT
20,912.16
205512
020309
5210.6186
HEAT
68,623.28
319396 2119/2009
119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
2 .9 7:48:57
Page - 5
Business Unit
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
YORK OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
MAINT OF COURSE $ GROUNDS
YORK FIRE STATION
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
WELL PUMPS
CLUB HOUSE
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
SENIOR CITIZENS
DISTRIBUTION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
134.95 205558 383659 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
562.50 205559 384378 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
319397
2/19/2009
100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD
77.22
POWER FOR LIFTSTATION
205395
4006
77.22
319398
2119/2009
105693, CITYSPRINT
154.44
COURIER
205396
13953
154.44
319399
2119/2009
100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.
384.90
205562
0118417620
277.00
205760
0188157321
661.90
319400
2/19/2009
120433 COMCAST
22.60
8772 10 614 0220686
205675
020209
22.60
319401
2/19/2009
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
15.00
SAFETY GLASSES, WELDING MASKfl0001796
205457
03406913
5932.6185
1554.6103
5862.5515
5842.5515
5620.6230
1552.6406
LIGHT 8 POWER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Council Check Register
Page - 6
2/18/2009
- 2/1912009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
135.28
SAFETY GLASSES, WELDING MASK80001796 205457
03406913
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
188.76
SAFETY GLASSES, WELDING MASK80001796 205457
03406913
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
72.30
MAT 00001778 205458
03406323
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
35.02
SAFETY GLASSES 00001860 205676
03409486
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
446.36
319402 2/1912009
101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC.
100.28
FORM TUBES 00001777 205459
0027019 -IN
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
100.28
319403 2119/2009
103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC.
79.29
OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001869 205460
93243589
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
83.06
OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001869 205460
93243589
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
194.26
OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001869 205460
93243589
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
291.77
OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001869 205460
93243589
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
648.38
319404 2/19/2009
100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
3.31
114 - 098556854 WATER 205677
1096442
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
3.31
319405 2/1912009
101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC
49.11
THERMOSTAT, GASKET 00001682 205461
300 -94220
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
596.55
EMERGENCY GENERATOR SERVICE 205678
100 -85807
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
645.66
319406 2/1912009
104020 DALCO
595.34
CAN LINERS, CLEANERS 00008003 205513
2066965
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
189.57
LIQUID SOAP 00001752 205514
2066408
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
263.91
CAN LINERS, WYPALL, TISSUE 00001803 205679
2067441
5915.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
448.58
CAN LINERS, WYPALL, TISSUE 00001803 205679
2067441
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1,497.40
319407. 2/1912009
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
1,678.50
205563
492265
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
59.20
205564
492266
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,469.80
205565
492264
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,369.15
205566
491380
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
720.00
205567
490595
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5,296.65
319408 2119/2009
102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC
156.56
319417 2/19/2009 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
1,143.00 CHAMBER DUES 205748 25367 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,143.00
CITY k
AA
2 d 7:48:57
R55CKREG ,320000
Council Check Register
Page - 7
2/18/2009
- 2/1912009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
95.32
MATS
00001872 205462
4- 115310
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
89.46
MUD GUARDS
00001540 205515
4- 115297
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
184.78
319409
2/19/2009
104940 DEFENSIVE EDGE
3,420.00
COURSE INSTRUCTION FEE
205680
233
7410.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
3,420.00
319410
211912009
105930 DELL MARKETING L.P.
694.60
LCD MONITOR
00004303 205397
XD3N515R3
2210.6711
NEW EQUIPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
694.60
319411
2/19/2009
122135 DENFELD, SCOTT
97.90
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
205747
021309
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
97.90
319412
2119/2009
111120 DESIGN N PRINT
359.95
APPLICATIONS, RENTAL AGREEMENT 205681
34715
5631.6575
PRINTING
CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION
359.95
319413
211912009
123162 DISH NETWORK
38.34
8255 70 708 1422839
205682
020509
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
38.34
319414
2/1912009
122199 DOLL, MARTY
131.56
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
205516
021009
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
131.56
319415
2/19/2009
100739 EAGLE WINE
1,311.62
205568
184334
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
899.65
205569
184345
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
454.50
205570
184341
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
11.99-
205571
770794
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,653.78
319416
2/19/2009
100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC.
156.56
VINYL GUARD
00006403 205398
0086026 -IN
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
156.56
319417 2/19/2009 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
1,143.00 CHAMBER DUES 205748 25367 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,143.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/1812009
— 2/19/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
319418
211912009
103594 EDINALARM INC.
168.00
MONITORING SERVICE 00001416 205517
52533
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
168.00
319419
211912009
100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC
3,467.50
UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS 205518
338882
5910.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,467.50
319420
2119/2009
106194 EMA INC.
175.00
SCADA SUPPORT 205683
5604- 90014059
5932.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,285.00
SCADA SUPPORT 205684
5604- 90014058
5932.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,460.00
319421
211912009
104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
254.15
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003654 205685
INV1140691
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
254.15
319422
211912009
124006 EWALD, DARLYNE
537.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 205519
021109
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
537.00
319423
2/19/2009
100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
335.65
PADS, ROTORS 00001539 205686
6- 1111850
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
147.39
BATTERIES 00001541 205687
6- 1112555
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
483.04
319424
2119/2009
122568 FITZGERALD EXCAVATING & TRUCKI -
1,665.00
EXCAVATE STORM SEWER OUTLE100001715 205688
2712
5932.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,665.00
319425
2/19/2009
103985 FLOR, JON
1,640.00
AD DESIGN 205749
2131
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,640.00
319426
211912009
118456 FULTON, LAURA
88.29
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 205689
021209
5631.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
88.29
319427
211912009
100764 G & K SERVICES
206.96
205399
013109
5913.6201
LAUNDRY
335.68
205399
013109
5511.6201
LAUNDRY
2118/2009 7:48:57
Page- 8
Buslness Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GENERAL (BILLING)
GENERAL STORM SEWER
GENERAL STORM SEWER
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL STORM SEWER
COMMUNICATIONS
CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CITY
NA
2 d 7:48:57
R55CKREG 620000
Council Check
Register
Page - 9
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier I Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
592.19
205399
013109
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
676.42
205399
013109
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
712.93
205399
013109
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
754.57
205399
013109
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
3,278.75
319428 2/1912009
100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA
112.60
AUTO PARTS
205520
013109
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
823.76
AUTO PARTS
205520
013109
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
936.36
319429 2/1912009
119936 GLOBAL OAK
118.75
EDINA LIQUOR E- COMMERCE
205750
010606
5840.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
118.75
EDINA LIQUOR It-COMMERCE
205750
010606
5860.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
118.75
EDINA LIQUOR E- COMMERCE
205750
010606
5820.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50TH STREET GENERAL
600.00
BRAEMAR ONLINE CALENDAR
205750
010606
5410.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
637.50
ART CENTER E- COMMERCE
205750
010606
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
675.00
PARK & REC E- COMMERCE
205750
010606
1627.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
1,181.25
WEBSITE MAINTENANCE
205750
010606
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
3,450.00
319430 2119/2009
100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC.
318.95
JANUARY SERVICE
205400
9010459
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
318.95
319431 2/19/2009
101103 GRAINGER
12.76
COUPLERS
00006406 205401
9826957715
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
61.03
SOCKET SET
00006402 205402
9823434650
5422.6556
TOOLS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
25.50
OIL FILTER PLIER
00006402 205403
9823434635
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
32.48
RETAINING RING PLIERS
00006402 205404
9823434643
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
713.37
HOIST
00006406 205405
9826758394
5422.6556
TOOLS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
56.31
MOTOR
00001794 205463
9830772290
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
155.81
SPOTLIGHTS, MEASURING WHEEL 00001858 205521
9834106958
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
145.80
EAR PLUGS
205690
9830572385
7412.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF RANGE
102.88
INFARED THERMOMETER
00002158 205691
9831970182
5620.6556
TOOLS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
43.40
PLIERS, GASKETS
00001858 205692
9834106941
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
1,349.34
319432 2/1912009
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
751.75
205572
107508
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
895.25
205761
107717
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,647.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
319433 2119/2009
124022 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING INC.
381.43
RECYCLE ELECTRONICS, AIR CONIB0006256
205693
09- 1535
5422.6182
381.43
319434 2119/2009
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
579.96
205573
184343
5822.5512
674.60
205574
184342
5822.5513
165.29
205575
184347
5842.5512
5,691.70
205576
184348
5842.5512
166.20
205577
184346
5842.5513
53.55
205578
184337
5862.5515
3,624.22
205579
184338
5862.5512
81.10
205580
184336
5862.5515
774.65
205581
184339
5862.5513
2,610.20
205582
184335
5862.5513
18.04-
205583
770866
5842.5513
73.10-
205584
770944
5822.5513
14.65-
205585
770863
5822.5513
14,315.68
319435 2/1912009
106431 HALL, MARY
150.00
ENTERTAINMENT 2/26/09
205651
021309
5610.6136
150.00
319436 2119/2009
100797 HAWKINS INC.
2,390.85
TONKAZORB 00005755
205464
1273437
5915.6586
2,390.85
319437 2/19/2009
105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION
2,387.36
RADIO ADMIN FEE
205694
29018726
1400.6151
1,575.54
RADIO ADMIN FEE
205695
29018725
1470.6151
160.00
RADIO ADMIN FEE 00001892
205751
29018788
1553.6237
4,122.90
319438 211912009
101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI
444.15
BOOKING FEE - JAN 2009
205465
2344
1195.6170
444.15
319439 2119/2009
103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
235.00
EMT REFRESHER
205696
CUST285055
1470.6104
235.00
Subledger Account Description
RUBBISH REMOVAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Page - 10
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2 3 7:48:57
Page - 11
Business Unit
ADMINISTRATION
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
9,725.37 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 205469 3425986 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK
27 679 88 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 205469 3425986 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION
37,405.25
CITY I
NA
R55CKREG .20000
211912009
100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL
POOL SUPPLY
560.03
POOL CHEMICALS
Council Check Register
9020226
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
560.03
2/18/2009
2/19/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
319440
211912009
116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY
100.00
PLAYOFF CHAMPION
205522
021009
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
223.65
WIDESCREEN 00004469 205466
45542453
1120.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
105.44
HP LASERJET
205467
45540324
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
42.00
HP3Y IMAGING
205468
45546432
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
390014380121
5821.6188
371.09
149.58
PHONE DIRECTORY AD
205470
319441
2119/2009
TELEPHONE
103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS
149.59
PHONE DIRECTORY AD
205470
390014380121
5861.6188
336.28
SOAP, TOWELS 00002159 205697
2767354
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
336.28
319447
2/1912009
121231 INTERLOCK CONCRETE
319442
2/1912009
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
423.84
CONCRETE PAVERS
00001746 205471
48876 -1
883.40
GENERAL SUPPLIES
205586
476771
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
25.95
205587
477392
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
372.25
205588
477391
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
205752
013109
1,281.60
GENERAL SUPPLIES
319443
2/19/2009
101774 HONEYWELL INC.
2 3 7:48:57
Page - 11
Business Unit
ADMINISTRATION
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
9,725.37 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 205469 3425986 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK
27 679 88 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 205469 3425986 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
STREET REVOLVING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
37,405.25
319444
211912009
100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL
POOL SUPPLY
560.03
POOL CHEMICALS
00002155 205698
9020226
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
560.03
319445
2119/2009
120684 HURLEY, TOM
100.00
PLAYOFF CHAMPION
205522
021009
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100.00
319446
2/19/2009
121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP
149.58
PHONE DIRECTORY AD
205470
390014380121
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
149.58
PHONE DIRECTORY AD
205470
390014380121
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
149.59
PHONE DIRECTORY AD
205470
390014380121
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
448.75
319447
2/1912009
121231 INTERLOCK CONCRETE
PRODUCTS IN
423.84
CONCRETE PAVERS
00001746 205471
48876 -1
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
423.84
319448
2/19/2009
100828 JERRY'S FOODS
12.57
205752
013109
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
STREET REVOLVING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Council Check Register
Page - 12
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
23.19
205752
013109
1622.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SKATING & HOCKEY
31.60
205752
013109
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
41.61
205752
013109
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
42.29
205752
013109
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
151.26
319449 211912009
100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE
5.18
205523
013109
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
18.18
205523
013109
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WELL HOUSES
21.27
205523
013109
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
21.91
205523
013109
1622.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SKATING & HOCKEY
24.91
205523
013109
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
27.64
205523
013109
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
28.86
205523
013109
•1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
33.22
205523
013109
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
57.21
205523
013109
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
57.72
205523
013109
5210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
58.29
205523
013109
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
108.88
205523
013109
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
136.68
205523
013109
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
194.12
205523
013109
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
203.54
205523
013109
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
220.19
205523
013109
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
239.20
205523
013109
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
303.46
205523
013109
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
624.50
205523
013109
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
765.74
205523
013109
44005.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS
3,150.70
319450 211912009
100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
2,635.88
GOLF COURSE BROCHURE
00006207 205699
45550
5410.6575
PRINTING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
2,635.88
319451 211912009
102146 JESSEN PRESS
77.75
BROCHURES
205472
11414
2210.6575
PRINTING
COMMUNICATIONS
228.66
2009 CIP
205753
12047
1160.6405
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
FINANCE
306.41
319452 2/19/2009
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
1,693.30
205589
1243136
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
6,865.18
205590
1243188
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
39.05
205762
1243179
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG ,G20000 CITY NA 2. 9 7:48:57
Council Check Register Page - 13
2/18/2009 -- 2/19/2009
Check # Date
319454 2/1912009
319455 2/19/2009
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2,952.18
205763
1243180
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
11,549.71
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
558.50
205591
1579707
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
127.82
205592
1579706
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
595.36
205593
1579089
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
163.01
205594
1579088
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,075.20
205595
1575777
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,161.01
.205596
1579087
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,827.19
205597
1579091
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
178.63
205598
1579090
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
642.00
205599
1579705
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
113.12
205600
1582585
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,593.00
205601
1582588
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,994.55
205602
1582591
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
6.93-
205603
408245
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
20.40-
205604
408247
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
101.44-
205605
408246
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,064.78
205764
1582584
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
892.43
205765
1582583
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,275.98
205766
1582581
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
54.82
205767
1582575
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
462.12
205768
1582577
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4,429.26
205769
1582582
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
124.11
205770
1582576
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
414.67
205771
1582579
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,748.84
205772
1582580
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
707.49
205773
1582570
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
526.73
205774
1582571
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
748.99
205775
1582572
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
782.49
205776
1582574
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
310.19
205777
1582573
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
242.24
205778
1582569
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
30,685.76
102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
21.19 TUBE, FITTINGS 00001791 205406 010426 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING
176.20 GAS VALVE 00001862 205700 011078 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
197.39
319456 2119/2009 111018 KEEPRS INC.
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Council Check Register
Page - 14
2/18/2009
2119/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
26.99
UNIFORMS
00003789 205701
111896
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
279.97
UNIFORMS
00003785 205702
109364 -01
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
119.99
UNIFORMS
00003784 205703
111740
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
426.95
319457
211912009
124021 KEN STONE MEDIA SERVICES
1,200.00
MEDIA TRAINING - EDINA 16
205653
021309
2210.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
COMMUNICATIONS
1,200.00
319458
211912009
101817 KLEINBERG, ERIC
172.60
UNIFORM PURCHASE
205704
021209
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
172.60
319459
2119/2009
122515 KOPLOS, GERALD
43.97
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
205705
021309
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
43.97
319460
2/1912009
101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC.
83.76
CHAIN & LINKS
00002315 205524
192251
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
83.76
319461
2119/2009
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
107.31
LUBRITEMP
00001679 205473
7743171
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
107.31
319462
2119/2009
100856 LINHOFF PHOTO
12.34
DIGITAL REPRINTS
205706
111283
1400.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
12.34
319463
2119/2009
101792 LUBE -TECH
75.49
WINDSHIELD WASH
00001574 205407
1624236
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
3,022.52
TRANSMISSION FLUID, OIL
00001574 205408
1624177
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
3,098.01
319464
2119/2009
100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC.
1,936.99
DIRT SHOE ASSEMBLIES
00005414 205409
2091054
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,980.38
HOSE, NOZZLES, SENDER
00001865 205707
2091058
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
3,917.37
319465
2119/2009
102414 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING LTD
385.86
LIGHTBULBS
00006194 205708
2595710 -01
5210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
385.86
CITY
NA
2 A 7:48:57
R55CKREC. ,G20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
2/18/2009
2119/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319466 2/19/2009
114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC.
471.84
JANITORIAL SERVICE
205709
C003239
7411.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
471.84
319467 2/19/2009
100868 MARK VII SALES
2,962.75
205606
431177
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
43.00
205607
431179
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
30.40
205608
431178
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,074.50
205609
428294
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,369.10
205610
430263
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,317.96
205779
432634
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,194.33
205780
432825
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
11,992.04
319468 2119/2009
124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN
30.42
REFRESHMENTS REIMBURSEMENT 205754
021309
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
55.55
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
205754
021309
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
85.97
319469 2/19/2009
112360 MAY, DOUG
229.98
MATERIALS FOR SIGN & BENCHES
205710
021209
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,000.00
LABOR FOR SIGN & BENCHES
205710
021209
5620.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,229.98
319470 2119/2009
113023 MEGGITT
1,443.00
GRANTEX RUBBER & PARTS
205711
INV- 0038812
7412.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF RANGE
1,443.00
319471 2/19/2009
101483 MENARDS
157.34
SKILSAW
00006404 205410
9476
5431.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
115.62
ROLLERS, BRUSHES, LUMBER
00001816 205474
12508
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
162.01
WOODWORKING SUPPLIES
00002340 205475
12005
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
74.73
SINK, PINE STOPS
00001400 205525
12131
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
140.49
PLYWOOD, SCREWS
00001403 205526
12317
1646.6577
LUMBER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
165.50
CLAMPS, LUMBER
00001793 205712
11917
45008.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION
815.69
319472 2/19/2009
101987 MENARDS
19.62
BALL VALVE
00002338 205476
58315
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
19.62
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Council Check Register
Page - 16
2/18/2009
— 2119/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319473
2/19/2009
100885 METRO SALES INC
1,930.69
COPIER MAINTENANCE 205477
315896
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,930.69
319474
2119/2009
102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
106.00
OFFICIATING FEES 205755
3515
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
106.00
319475
2/1912009
102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI
35.03
STRUT 00001684 205479
462663FOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
67.65
KITS 00001688 205527
462719FOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
102.68
319476
2/19/2009
116103 MID -WEST INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CO
200.00
THAW FROZEN WATER SERVICE 00001712 205411
39187
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
200.00
THAW FROZEN WATER SERVICE 00001714 205480
39193
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
400.00
319477
2119/2009
118464 MIDWEST TESTING
1,160.00
METER TESTING 00001717 205713
1088
5917.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
METER REPAIR
1,160.00
—
319478
2/19/2009
100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR
58.05
HEAT GUN 00006252 205412
8322567
5422.6556
TOOLS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
45.35
RECONDITION HEAT GUN 00006396 205413
8323064
5422.6556
TOOLS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
103.40
319479
2119/2009
105716 MINNESOTAAWWA
1,085.00
WATERWORKS OPERATORS SCHOOL 205714
2009
5919.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
1,085.00
319480
211912009
101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS
58.58
PERMITS TO AQUIRE 205478
2076
1400.6575
PRINTING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
58.58
319481
2119/2009
101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
32.00
LICENSES TESTING 205715
021209
5919.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
TRAINING
32.00
319482
2/19/2009
101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
112.30
METER FLANGE GASKETS 00001705 205414
0235594
5917.6530
REPAIR PARTS
METER REPAIR
13,456.90
205415
0235118
5917.6530
REPAIR PARTS
METER REPAIR
R55CKREG jG20000 CITY NA
Council Check Register
2/18/2009 -- 2/19/2009
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
13.456.90- 205416 0235354 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS
319483 211912009
118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF
CPA'S
140.00
MNCPA MEMBERSHIP
205417
020209
5910.6105
140.00
319484 2/19/2009
101316 MMBA
268.00
BOOT CAMP REGISTRATION
205481
020909
5860.6104
268.00
319485 2/19/2009
121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP
92.32
SENSOR
00001688
205482
465078F6W
1553.6530
87.63
SENSOR
00001683
205483
464942F6W
1553.6530
1.33
LOCKING PIN
00001534
205484
464820F6W
1553.6530
143.03
SEALANT
00001691
205528
465190F6W
1553.6530
324.31
319486 2/19/2009
100912 MOTOROLA INC.
2,138.78
SERVICE AGREEMENT
205716
78107991
1400.6230
2,138.78
319487 2/19/2009
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
564.43
BEARINGS
00006405
205418
651849 -00
5431.6530
616.83
BEARINGS, FORKS
00006400
205419
651304 -00
5422.6530
264.82
BEARINGS
00006397
205420
650861 -00
5422.6530
340.18
MOWER PARTS
00002336
205485
652124 -00
5630.6530
683.11
BEARINGS, SEALS
00006409
205717
652586 -00
5422.6530
447.02
BEARINGS
00006407
205718
651938 -00
5422.6530
-
1,815.58
670 CONVERSION
00006411
205719
652796 -00
5422.6611
4,731.97
319488 211912009
100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
324.81
CAMERA
00001412
205529
0211907EDRW
1646.6406
324.81
319489 2/19/2009
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
'
1,555.97
SIGNS
00001646
205421
TI -0203799
1325.6531
1,555.97
319490 2119/2009
122989 NISCAYAH INC.
192.60
ALARM MONITORING
205745
DC00005038
5620.6250
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
2 9 7:48:57
Page- 17
Business Unit
METER REPAIR
GENERAL (BILLING)
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
ALARM SERVICE EDINBOROUGH PARK
R55CKREG LOG20000
205611
CITY OF EDINA
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
839.25
205612
Council Check Register
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
54.25
205613
2118/2009
- 2/19/2009
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
1,521.75
192.60
319499 2119/2009 100950 PETTY CASH
319491
2/19/2009
117102 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO.
79.95 REFUND OF SHORTAGE
205531
021209
5900.2015
4,745.34
SALT 00005306 205486
70308830
1318.6525
SALT
4,745.34
319492
2119/2009
115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC.
26.00
UNIFORMS 00005413 205487
NIA3841E
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
31.00
UNIFORMS 00005413 205487
NIA3841E
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
57.00
319493
2/19/2009
101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP
121.41
STEEL ANGLE 00001685 205720
145731
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
121.41
319494
211912009
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
472.87
DOG LICENSES BILLING 205488
462876832 -001
1450.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
472.87
319495
2/19/2009
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
789.13
UNDERBED TRUCK BOX 00001813 205489
538281
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
789.13
319496
2119/2009
119486 PARAGON LAND SCULPTING
2,000.00
DIRT DISPOSAL 00001873 205530
2697
1301.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2,000.00
319497
2/1912009
100941 'PARK NICOLLET CLINIC
118.00
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 205490
020609
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
118.00
319498
2/19/2009
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Page - 18
Business Unit
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ANIMAL CONTROL
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
595.00
205611
8213189 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
839.25
205612
82131934N
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
54.25
205613
8212546 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
33.25
205614
8212422 -IN
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,521.75
319499 2119/2009 100950 PETTY CASH
79.95 REFUND OF SHORTAGE
205531
021209
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
79.95
R55CKREC jG20000
CITY
NA
2 i9 7:48:57
Council Check
Register
Page - 19
2118/2009
- 2/19/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319500 2/1912009
103512 PETTY CASH
36.52-
205724
021309
1400.8060
CASH OVER AND UNDER
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
8.00
205724
021309
1553.6238
CAR WASH
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
11.12
205724
021309
1400.6575
PRINTING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
20.00
205724
021309
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
26.85
205724
021309
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
62.75
205724
021309
1400.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
66.97
205724
021309
1400.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
160.48
205724
021309
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
318.49
205724
021309
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
638.14
319501 211912009
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
772.27
205615
2714322
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,285.34
205616
2714320
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
422.48
205617
2714321
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,549.44
205618
2714779
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
81.97
205619
2717111
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
481.12-
205620
3403260
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
22.67-
205621
3403413
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
129.12-
205622
3403775
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
290.98
205781
2717106
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
41.12
205782
2717108
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,658.70
205783
2717105
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
726.34
205784
2717103
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,045.09
205785
2717107
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
667.76
205786
2717102
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
924.47
205787
2717101
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
8,833.05
319502 .2119/2009
111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION
2,083.52
ICE MELT 00001809 205422
208333
1318.6516
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
2,083.52
319503 2/19/2009
100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO.
238.71
BRAKES, SEAL 00001538 205532
1- 909107
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
238.71
319504 2/1912009
100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT
395.49
SERVICE CALL 00001861 205423
0051795 -IN
5915.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
WATER TREATMENT
395.49
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Page - 20
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POOL ADMINISTRATION
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
WM-481 M'SIDE H2OMAIN PIPELINE
1,686.00
205626
120182 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
CITY OF EDINA
980.09
R55CKREG LOG20000
119831 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
258.14
205628
119864 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,842.79
Council Check Register
119829 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
349.60
205630
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
319505
211912009
5842.5514
120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY
YORK SELLING
2,882.67
205633
119830 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
383.40
ARTICLE FRAMING
205721
306261
1400.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
216.80
383.40
119863 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
34.33-
319506
2/1912009
5822.5513
119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC.
50TH ST SELLING
95.00
205788
120183-00
5822.5514
214.24
TIRES
00001786 205491
515733
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
214.24
319507
2119/2009
100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
-
945.00
POSTAGE
205533
021209
5310.6235
POSTAGE
945.00
319508
211912009
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
407.85
205623
184340
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
841.70
205624
184349
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
502.40
205625
184344
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,751.95
319509
211912009
113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES
154.62
DRILL BITS
00001771 205492
80856
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
187.59
CABLE TIES, PLOW BOLTS
00001661 205493
80854
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
290.64
SCREWS, NYLOCK
00001868 205722
80868
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
632.85
319510
211912009
100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
240.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
205723
07022.20
05481.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
240.00
319511
2119/2009
100971 QUALITY WINE
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Page - 20
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POOL ADMINISTRATION
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
WM-481 M'SIDE H2OMAIN PIPELINE
1,686.00
205626
120182 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
980.09
205627
119831 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
258.14
205628
119864 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,842.79
205629
119829 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
349.60
205630
119862 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,054.50
205631
120178 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
205.00
205632
120179 -00
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
2,882.67
205633
119830 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
931.80
205634
120180 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
216.80
205635
119863 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
34.33-
205636
118869 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
95.00
205788
120183-00
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
12,468.06
R55CKREC: jG20000 CITY iNA
Council Check Register
2/18/2009 -- 2/19/2009
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
319512 211912009 103930 QUIST, SUSAN
176.93 UNIFORM PURCHASE 205494 021109 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
REPAIR PARTS
REGISTRATION FEES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2. j9 7:48:57
Page- 21
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PSTF REVENUE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
PRINTING
REPAIR PARTS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
176.93
319513
2/1912009
100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC.
2,031.50
REELS 00006410
205725
CD1179137
5422.6530
2,031.50
319514
211912009
124020 RADIMECLEY, LINDA
79.00
CLASS REFUND
205652
021309
7401.4390
79.00
319515
2119/2009
100149 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES
6.39
OIL FILTERS 00006416
205726
038594609
5422.6530
25.53
ADAPTERS 00006413
205727
038593769
5422.6406
31.92
319516
2119/2009
100975 RED WING SHOE STORE
161.46
SAFETY BOOTS 00005189
205495
953
5422.6406
169.96
SAFETY BOOTS 00005189
205495
953
1553.6610
227.41
SAFETY BOOTS 00005189
205495
953
1301.6610
336.37
SAFETY BOOTS 00005189
205495
953
1646.6610
412.13
SAFETY BOOTS 00005189
205495
953
5620.6406
1,307.33
319517
2119/2009
122170 REGION 3AA
611.00
% GIRLS SECTION QUARTER FINAL
205756
021709
5511.6136
611.00
319518
211912009
114489 RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION
110.76
COPIER USAGE
205728
404707930
7410.6575
110.76
319519
2/19/2009
102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
199.53
TRAILER WIRING 00001805
205729
1010198 -01
1553.6530
199.53
319520
211912009
101311 ROOT -0-MATIC SEWER SERVICE
410.00
THAW SANITARY SEWER 00001419
205730
29605
1646.6180
410.00
REPAIR PARTS
REGISTRATION FEES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2. j9 7:48:57
Page- 21
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PSTF REVENUE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
PRINTING
REPAIR PARTS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000
406.00
CITY OF EDINA
319526
211912009
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
Council Check
Register
16.08
101 - 25373069350 00007162 205731
2/12FOOD
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
319521
2/19/2009
124004 ROSE, MIKE
100.75
PROPS FOR COMMERCIAL 205496
SH9004
75.00
PLAYOFF RUNNER -UP
205534
021009
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
75.00
319528
2119/2009
100990 SCHARBER & SONS
319522
2/1912009
123845 ROYAL CONSUMER INFO PROD
256.05
BATTERY 00001544 205536
1018592
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
26.47
CASH REGISTER RIBBON 00002333 205535
000258066
5631.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
319529
26.47
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
319523
2119/2009
62.61
123912 RUFLEDT, BRIDGETTE
40721628
5210.6530
REPAIR PARTS
62.61
57.75
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
205757
021709
1622.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
105514 SCHIRO, DOUG
57.75
319524
211912009
100988 .SAFETY KLEEN
121.00
OIL FILTERS DISPOSAL
205424
0038183922
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
311.41
PARTS WASHER
205425
0038183923
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
432.41
319525
2119/2009
101232 SALUD AMERICA INC.
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Page - 22
Business Unit
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION
SKATING & HOCKEY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
40600 205637 EMLYAS020609D 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
GRILL
COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
19.00 LICENSE UPGRADE 205497 021009 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
19.00
319531 2119/2009 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH
406.00
319526
211912009
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
16.08
101 - 25373069350 00007162 205731
2/12FOOD
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
16.08
319527
211912009
104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF
100.75
PROPS FOR COMMERCIAL 205496
SH9004
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100.75
319528
2119/2009
100990 SCHARBER & SONS
256.05
BATTERY 00001544 205536
1018592
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
256.05
319529
211912009
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
62.61
PLYWOOD, LUMBER 00006184 205426
40721628
5210.6530
REPAIR PARTS
62.61
319530
211912009
105514 SCHIRO, DOUG
GRILL
COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
19.00 LICENSE UPGRADE 205497 021009 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
19.00
319531 2119/2009 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH
CITY
NA
z 9 7:48:57
R55CKREG _;G20000
Council Check Register
Page - 23
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
398.14
PETTY CASH
205537
020909
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
398.14
319532
2119/2009
101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL
196.96
REIMBURSE RECOGNITION LUNCH
205732
021209
1400.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
196.96
319533
2/1912009
105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP
751.16
SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIRS
205733
64303956
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
751.16
319534
211912009
100301 SIMPLOT PARTNERS
198.91
FERTILIZER
00001393 205538
S0658526
1643.6540
FERTILIZER
GENERAL TURF CARE
198.91
319535
2/1912009
101000 SIR SPEEDY
40.47
BUSINESS CARDS
205427
59481
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
40.47
319536
2/19/2009
104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL C
23,381.49
2008 MS TRUE -UP ADDITIONS
00004430 205746
D02BF
1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
23,381.49
319537
2119/2009
122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY
1,900.00
REGISTRATION FEES
205498
8177
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
900.00
COURSE REGISTRATIONS
205734
8180
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,800.00
319538
211912009
101003 SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS
280.00
SAFETY TRAINING MANUALS
205735
6915
1460.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
280.00
319539
211912009
101004 SPS COMPANIES
192.34
PVC PRIMER AND CEMENT
00001406 205539
S1990854.001
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
213.88
PLUMBING PARTS
00002148 205736
S1982962.001
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
406.22
319540
2119/2009
101015 STREICHERS
27.68
HOLSTER
205737
1597294
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
44.99-
205738
CM231502
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
44.99
205739
1593069
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
27.68
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/18/2009 7:48:57
Council Check Register
Page - 24
2/18/2009
-- 2/19/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319541
2/19/2009
102919 SUNGARD USER GROUP ASSOC
195.00
MEMBERSHIP
205540
021109
1400.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
195.00
319542
211912009
120998 SURLY BREWING CO.
682.00
205638
JM7152
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
682.00
319543
2/1912009
101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
103.04
RELAYS 00001434
205499
51410 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
103.04
319544
2/19/2009
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
28.50
205639
528075
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,381.80
205640
528074
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,410.30
319545
2(19/2009
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
37.08
WELDING SUPPLIES
205500
465037
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
37.08
319546
211912009
101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY
96.00
205641
216011
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
64.00
205642
216010
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
160.00
319547
2119/2009
123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT
65.00
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
205428
101518231
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
65.00
319548
211912009
'101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
145.49
GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00002342
205501
309727
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
145.49
319549
2/19/2009
115379 U.S. BANK
25.00
CHAMBER MEETING
205429
020309
1120.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATION
16.90
NET ZERO
205502
FEB0309
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
78.20
PAYPAL INTERNET
205502
FEB0309
1550.6155
BANK SERVICES CHARGES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
20.41
LOCK ASSEMBLY ( ARMOR)
205503
2/3109
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
56.61
MAILBOX (LOWES)
205503
213/09
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
109.68
LUMBER (HOME DEPOT)
205503
2/3/09
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG jG20000
CITY
NA
Council Check Register
2118/2009
-2/19/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
291.30
MNDOT DECALS, NORTHERN TOOL
205503
2/3/09
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
598.10
319550
2/1912009
101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
199.64
UNIFORMS
205504
013109
1419.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1,085.71
UNIFORMS
205504
013109
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1,285.35
319551
2/19/2009
103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE
16.45
SHIPPING CHARGES
205505
TRAN:8354
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
16.45
319552
2/19/2009
100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS
INC.
328.37
205740
S0319246B
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
328.37
319553
2/1912009
122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC
139.52
OXYGEN
00003649 205741
878750
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
139.52
319554
211912009
103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC.
2,454.49
WATER MAIN REPAIR
00001713 205506
14235
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2,454.49
319555
2/19/2009
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
537.26
BAGS, TOWELS
00007513 205430
110989 -00
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
362.19
LIQUOR BAGS
205431
110990 -00
5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
347.90
LIQUOR BAGS
00007512 205541
110987 -00
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
20.52-
CREDIT
00007512 205542
109337CM
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
1,226.83
319556
2119/2009
120318 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES
55.76
RECYCLE BULBS
00001882 205543
EW388275
5820.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55.77
RECYCLE BULBS
00001882 205543
EW388275
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55.77
RECYCLE BULBS
00001882 205543
EW388275
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
55.77
RECYCLE BULBS
00001882 205543
EW388275
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
223.07
319557
2/19/2009
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
49.58
SAFETY GLASSES
00001783 205507
222101
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
49.58
2 9 7:48:57
Page - 25
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
RESERVE PROGRAM
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH STREET GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EDINBOROUGH PARK
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2118/2009 7:48:57
Council Check Register
Page - 26
2/18/2009
- 2/19/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319558 2/19/2009
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
10.24
BULBS 00001763 205432
15121657 -01
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
54.45
LIGHTING 00001802 205508
15122288 -00
1646.6578
LAMPS & FIXTURES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
64.69
319559 2/1912009
123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC
452.20
LEAK LOCATING
205433
1095
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
452.20
319560 211912009
124019 WILD PRAIRIE BRASS CHOIR
150.011
ENTERTAINMENT 2/24/09
205650
021309
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
319561 2119/2009
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
893.20
-
205643
211851 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,109.20
205644
211855 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
281.20
205789
211852 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,283.60
319562 2/1912009
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
810.83
205645
262297
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
332.00
205646
262375
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
547.67
205790
263204
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
537.60
205791
263205
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
558.73
205792
263207
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,786.83
319563 211912009
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
1,023.60
205647
224495
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
713.75
205648
224498
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,629.30
205649
224500
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,366.65
319564 2/19/2009
101726 XCEL ENERGY
35.98
51- 7567037 -0
205434
183916707
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
18.62
51- 4151897-0
205435
183853467
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
765.70
51- 9013604 -6
205436
183947500
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
4,809.17
51- 5619094 -8
205437
184393909
1552.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
6,017.35
51- 5888961 -7
205438
184398646
1375.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PARKING RAMP
385.78
51. 4197645 -8
205509
184532288
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
1,709.18
51- 6840050 -6
205544
184587868
5911.6185
LIGHT & POWER
WELL PUMPS
1,576.98
51- 6840050 -6
205793
184955644
5911.6185
LIGHT & POWER
WELL PUMPS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O. NA
Council Check Register
2/18/2009 — 2119/2009
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
15,318.76
319565 2119/2009
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
152.49
JAN USAGE - BLDG/ENG 00004322 205742 038596098
152.49
319566 2/19/2009
101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
120.09
FIRST AID SUPPLIES 205744 54064294
120.09
319567 2/19/2009
101091 ZIEGLER INC
341.90
GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 205743 E6076406
341.90
472,923.77
Grand Total
1550.6151
7411.6406
1470.6215
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 472,923.77
Total Payments 472,923.77
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
2/1, J 7:48:57
Page- 27
Business Unit
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
PSTF OCCUPANCY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKSUM LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Summary
2/18/2009 - 2/19/2009
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
148,886.53
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
7,890.54
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
3,090.75
05100 ART CENTER FUND
2,397.49
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
21,587.46
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
945.00
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
18,336.43
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
44,533.50
05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND
22,129.72
05800 LIQUOR FUND
131,358.19
05900 UTILITY FUND
25,611.93
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
3,202.22
05950 RECYCLING FUND
37,077.90
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
5,876.11
Report Totals 472,923.77
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policjgsand
procedures
r,
211812009 7:50:33
Page - 1
CITY
NA
2 .9 8:08:28
R55CKREG jG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 1
2/23/2009
—2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319568
2/2312009
100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
3,047.38
PARK & REC INSIDER POSTAGE
206049
021909
2210.6235
POSTAGE
COMMUNICATIONS
3,047.38
319569
2/2612009
118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC.
5,730.44
LIFE FITNESS TREADMILL 00002154 206132
22- 016471
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
5,730.44
319570
2126/2009
100613 AAA
9.50
TABS FOR 26.189
205996
021909
1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
9.50
319571
212612009
119577 ACCESS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
10,405.24
LOCATE SERVICES ON FIBER OPTIC
205809
12398
46001.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FIBER OPTIC CABLING
10,405.24
319572
212612009
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
32.00
206050
0721860
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
32.00
319573
2/26/2009
105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES
31.10
ALARM SERVICE
206185
87550899
5111.6250
ALARM SERVICE
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
31.10
319574
2/26/2009
105571 ADVANTAGE PAPER
150.10
SUPPLIES
205997
435002
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
150.10
319575
212612009
120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC.
759.50
ADVENTURE PEAK LIGHTING
206133
5911
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,474.24
REWIRE CIRCULATING PUMP 00002160 206134
5856
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
3,233.74
319576
2126/2009
103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC.
195.13
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
205998
ALERTINV11247
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
195.13
319577
2126/2009
101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
370.62
HEADSET 00003840 206135
7820
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
370.62
319578
2/2612009
124041 APEX SOFTWARE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
212312009
—2126/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
720.00
MAINTENANCE RENEWALS (6)
206136
022309
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
720.00
319579
2126/2009
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
607.34
FOOD
205999
1103725
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
607.34
319580
2/26/2009
102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
4,900.00
POOL WATER HEATER REPLACEMEI0UO2169
206137
33598
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
'
4,900.00
319581
2126/2009
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
379.73
COFFEE
205927
411696
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
158.91
COFFEE
206000
411740
5210.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
538.64
319582
2/26/2009
121411 ARMSTRONG, MARGARET
60.00
TRIP REFUND
206001
021709
1628.4392.07
SENIOR TRIPS
60.00
319583
2126/2009
121019 ASCE
225.00
MEMBERSHIP - JACK SULLIVAN
205810
021709
1260.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
225.00
319584
2/26/2009
102573 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAG
20.00
MEMBERSHIP - SOLVEI WILMOT
205928
021109
5952.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
20.00
319585
2/26/2009
104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN
112.32
BUSINESS CARDS
206138
456
1400.6575
PRINTING
112.32
319586
2/26/2009
123086 BAILEY CONSTRUCTION
393.43
FINAL PAYMENT
206196
022709
07100A.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
26,024.18
FINAL PAYMENT
206196
022709
07100.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
26,417.61
319587
2/26/2009
124039 BARTLETT TREE EXPERTS
1,611.00
TREE TRIMMING
206002
31262392 -0
5422.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,611.00
319588
212612009
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Page- 2
Business Unit
ASSESSING
GRILL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
SENIOR CITIZENS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
RECYCLING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
S100A GORGAS AVE SIDEWALK
5100 HALIFAX AV - 51ST TO 54TH
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CITY I
NA
2t. d 8:08:28
R55CKREG _jG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
2/23/2009
-2/26/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
42.58
BATTERIES
00001749 205929
18- 230356
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
50.04
BATTERY
00001262 205930
18- 229280
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
92.62
319589 212612009
100607 BAUER, MICHAEL
199.96
UNIFORM PURCHASE
205814
021709
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
199.96
319590 212612009
122593 BELDE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,893.90
JANITORIAL SERVICES
206139
970
5620.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
1,893.90
319591 2126/2009
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
89.77
205862
81898400
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
432.75
205863
47895500
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
6.52
206051
81881200
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
529.04
319592 2126/2009
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
197.71
OFFICE SUPPLIES
205811
WO- 544815 -1
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
19.32
OFFICE SUPPLIES
205812
WO- 547350 -1
1600.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
180.28
LABELS, TAPE, CALCULATOR
205813
OE- 186221 -1
1140.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLANNING
211.87
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003083 205931
WO- 547050 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
37.26
SHREDDER BAGS
206003
WO- 547332 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
22.24
FOOTREST
206004
WO- 547514 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17.03
WRIST REST
206005
WO- 546787 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
87.99-
RETURN
206006
CP- WO- 543165 -1 1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
15.27
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00009469 206186
OE- 185252 -1
5110.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
612.99
319593 212612009
105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
116.60
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003799 206143
87043832
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
339.36
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003806 206144
87044390
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
133.86
OXYGEN CYLINDER & REGULATOR 206145
87044682
1400.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
345.89
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
206145
87044682
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
935.71
319594 2/26/2009
119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
115.00
206052
94827
5842.5513
COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
115.00
319595 212612009
123621 BRAEMAR ARENA
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2009 8:08:28
Council Check Register Page - 4
2/23/2009 — 2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
181.73
ICE TIME
206007
1252 -1
4077.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
181.73
319596
2126/2009
102785 BRIDGE, THE
5,000.00
2009 FUNDING
206008
020909
1504.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
5,000.00
319597
2126/2009
122533 C & L EXCAVATING INC.
783.75
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
206197
022709
01345.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
BA -345 WOODLAND CIR
12,608.93
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
206197
022709
04349.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
STS -349 WOODEND DRIVE
19,712.50
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.3
206197
022709
08052.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
L -52 WOODLAND LN & WOODEND DR
33,105.18
319598
212612009
108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
1,968.80
CABLE ADS
206009
09206 -1
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
1,968.80
319599
2/2612009
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
48.50
205864
13477
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,420.75
205865
13476
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
15.10
205866
13478
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
266.40
205867
13479
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,750.75
319600
2/2612009
124035 CARLAND, DAVE
75.00
2ND PLACE PRIZE
205932
021909
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
75.00
319601
2126/2009
124040 CAROON, LIBERTY
500.00
ULTRASOUND TRAINING
206146
002009 -01
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
500.00
319602
2/2612009
116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
277.18
206053
81163
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
277.18
319603
212612009
103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES
IN
12,728.33
206010
1756622
5620.6186
HEAT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
13,325.28
206011
1756652
1552.6186
HEAT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
39.03
206012
1756662
5311.6186
HEAT
POOL OPERATION
26,092.64
R55CKREG �G20000
CITY
iNA
` "9 8:08:28
Council Check Register
Page- 5
2/23/2009
--2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description,
Business Unit
319604
2/28/2009
105038 CENTRAL MN TREE SERVICE LLC
745.50
DISEASED TREE REMOVAL 00001426 205933
021009 -1426
4088.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE REMOVAL
1,810.50
DISEASED TREE REMOVAL 00001427 205934
021009 -1427
4088.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE REMOVAL
2,556.00
319605
2/26/2009
119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
142.90
206054
384603
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
142.90
319606
2126/2009
104363.-CHOICE POINT INC.
-
240.00
AUTOTRACK SERVICES 205935
' AB0001934203
1400.6103
PROFESSIONALSERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
240.00
319607
2/2612009
100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
150.00
ENTERTAINMENT 3 /5/09 206131
022109
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL`SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
319606
2/26/2009
100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC
14.51
WINDOW CLEANING 206013
'436768
5861.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
VERNON OCCUPANCY
16.62
WINDOW CLEANING 206013
436768
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
25.99
WINDOW CLEANING 206013
436768
5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
YORK OCCUPANCY
57.12
319609
2/26/2009
100692 ` COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.
420.20
206055
0118418504
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
-
420.20
319610
2/26/2009
101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
621.52
BITUMINOUS PLANT INSPECTION 206195
PA000162811
01349.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
BA- 34976TH ST- FRANCE TO YORK
10,108.74
ASPHALT' EMULSION 206195
PA000162811
1314.6519
ROAD OIL
STREET RENOVATION
10,730.26
319611
2/2612009
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
8.00
SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00001878 205815
03411853
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
12.88
SAFETY GLASSES; GLOVES, - -. 00001878 205815
03411853
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
35.00
SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00001878 205815
03411853
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
35.00
SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00001878- 205815
03411853
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT"
- DISTRIBUTION
90.88
319612
2126/2009
100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO.
138.33
CLAY 00009453 206187
INV000041446
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
904.03
CLAY 00009453 206187
INV000041446
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
R55CKREG LOG20000
1,611.50
CITY OF EDINA
493175
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
Council Check Register
205869
492263
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2123/2009
-2126/2009
84.00
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
214.00
1,042.36
493200
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
319613
2/26/2009
105905 CURRENT ORDER PROCESSING CENTE
493174
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
212.92
GREETING CARDS
206014
SPRING2009
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
212.92
212612009
122135 DENFELD, SCOTT
319614
2/2612009
100703 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS
20.31
VIDEO ADAPTER
206017
021909
37.00
DOOR CHECKS, TAG
00001949 205937
12653
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
VIDEO MAILING TO COMCAST
206017
37.00
2210.6235
POSTAGE
COMMUNICATIONS
319615
2126/2009
104020 DALCO
319618
2126/2009
1,363.73
CLEANING SUPPLIES
00008016 205938
2069030
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
84.14
DISPENSER
00001803 206015
2069710
5915.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
215.13
PUNCHES
00001864 206016
2069029
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
358.37
DEGREASER
00003808 206147
2067065
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,021.37
18.00
ACCT 110350670
206188
319616
2/2612009
ADVERTISING OTHER
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
18.00
2125/2009 8:08:28
Page - 6
Business Unit
SENIOR CITIZENS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
WATER TREATMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,611.50
205868
493175
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,674.57
205869
492263
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
84.00
205870
492278
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
214.00
205871
493200
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
795.10
205872
493174
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
4,379.17
319617
212612009
122135 DENFELD, SCOTT
20.31
VIDEO ADAPTER
206017
021909
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
33.63
VIDEO MAILING TO COMCAST
206017
021909
2210.6235
POSTAGE
COMMUNICATIONS
53.94
319618
2126/2009
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
55.85
BAKERY
206018
294357
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
55.85
319619
2/2612009
102831 DEX EAST
18.00
ACCT 110350670
206188
021069
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
18.00
319620
2/26/2009
118638 DOGWATCH OF THE TWIN CITIES
275.00
DOG FENCE REPAIR
205975
103108
01345.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -345 WOODLAND CIR
275.00
CITY
9NA
i9 8:08:28
R55CKREG' = 7G20000
Council Check Register
Page - 7
2/2312009
—2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Suppller/, Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319621
2126/2009
100739 EAGLEVANE
3,553.07
206056
187442
5842.5513,
COST OF: ^GOODS;SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,282.80
206057
187437
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST.,SELLING
2,208.84
206058
187431
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
7,044.71
319622
2/26/2009
100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC.
93.73
. FLAGSTICK PLASTIC
00006408 206019
.0086104-IN
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
93.73
_
319623
_ 2/26/2.009
124038 EDINA LAWN SPRINKLER
SYSTEMS
569.75
SPRINKLER REPAIR
205976
543763
01342.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA
569.75
319624
•212612009
101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
5,352.00
CITY GYM MAINTENANCE
205977
7514
1621.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
5,352.00'
319625
212612009
100549, ZLECTRICYUMP INC.
'
45.13
SHIMS
00001859 206020
0038181 -IN
5921.6530
REPAIR PARTS
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
45.13
319626
2/26/2009
117868 ELK RIVER FORD INC..
22,276.36
2009 CROWN VICTORIA
00003032 206148
038472
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
22,276.36
319627
2126/2009
124042 ELNESS,SWENSON GRAHAM ARCHITEC
2,542.50
REMODEL SERVICES
206149
0021979
5600.1720
BUILDINGS
EB /CL BALANCE SHEET
2,542.50
319628
2126/2009
..101956 EMERGENCY.APPARATUS MAINTENANC
674.65
E -83 REPAIRS -
206150
40604
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
•
674.65
319629
2/26/2009
100851 ENCOMM MIDWEST INC.
.
24,759.66
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6
206198
022709
05483.1705.30
CONTRACTOR' PAYMENTS
WM-483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX
24,759.66
319630
2126/2009
100146 .FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
COMPANY
53.38
BRAKE PADS
00001693 205939
1- 3035955
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
742.41
SILICONE SEAL, ROTORS, PADS
00001693 205940'
6- 1113765
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS.
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN '
69.13-
CREDIT
205941
6- 1114727
.1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Council Check Register
Page - 8
2/23/2009
—2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
726.66
319631
2/26/2009
120687 FARRELL, JOHN
100.00
FIRST PLACE PRIZE 205942
021709
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
100.00
319632
2/26/2009
106035 FASTENAL COMPANY
26.46
SHOT LOADS 00001795 206151
MNTC296774
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
26.46
319633
2126/2009
102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON
75.09
LIQUOR SHELF SIGNS 205943
190 -35643
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
75.09
319634
2126/2009
105420 FIKES SERVICES
39.41
AIR DEODORIZERS 205944
51695
5841.6162
SERVICES CUSTODIANS
YORK OCCUPANCY
39.41
319635
2/26/2009
122568 FITZGERALD EXCAVATING & TRUCKI
22,265.63
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 205992
022709
04357.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
STS -357 STORMWATER DREDGING
22,265.63
319636
2/26/2009
122568 FITZGERALD EXCAVATING & TRUCKI
2,527.50
FINAL PAYMENT 206199
022309
04322.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
STS -322 STORMWATER DREDGING
2,527.50
319637
212612009
103985 FLOR, JON
100.00
AD DESIGN 205816
2132
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
100.00
319638
2/26/2009
121564 FLUTE COCKTAIL
150.00
ENTERTAINMENT 313/09 206129
022109
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
319639
2/2612009
101557 FMAM
105.00
DUES- JENSON, MEDZIS, GARFIN 206152
021909
1470.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
105.00
319640
2/26/2009
121634 FORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA
1,203.45
THERMAL ROLLS 00003081 206153
111026
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,203.45
R55CKREG A20000
CITY
iNA
21 ' -;9 8:08:28
Council Check
Register
Page - 9
2/23/2009
-- 2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319641
212612009
100764 G & K SERVICES '
61.92
SHOP TOWELS
205817
1006404169
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS
"
61.92
SHOP TOWELS
206021
1006429718
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
123.84
319642
2126/2009
115314 GALAXY COMPUTER INC.
12,281.13
PRINTER MAINTENANCE CONTRAC90004473 205818
4292
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
12,281.13
319643
2/2612009
124030 GAVIC & SONS PLUMBING
25.04
PERMIT REFUND
205819
ED093439
1495.4112
PLUMBING PERMITS
INSPECTIONS
'
25.04
319644
2126/2009
120686 GINKEL, BRIAN
75.00
SECOND PLACE PRIZE
205945
021709
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
-.
75.00
319645
2/2612009
120344 !,;GLASS MASTERS: INC.
240.00
EXIT DOOR REPAIR
206154
13545
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
"
240.00
319646
2/26/2009
101103` GRAINGER
59.68
HAND CLEANER TOWELS, BATTERIE6001866
205820
9835791931
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES _
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
56.31
MOTOR
00001881 205946
9838200682
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
115.99
319647
212612009
120201 GRANICUS INC.
829.64
WEBSTREAMING
205821
.10963
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
829.64
319648
212612009
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC.
196.50
205873
107718
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING.
322.25
205874
107715
5862.5513.
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
162.25
206059
107878
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS' SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,424.75
206060
107880
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
839.75
206061
107879
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,945.50
319649
2126/2009
100783, GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
INC.
'
99.56
LIGHTING
00002164 206155
939631237
5620.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
146.61
LIGHTING
00002161 206156
939578196
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
246.17
R55CKREG LOG20000
YORK SELLING
CITY OF
EDINA
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
Council Check Register
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
2/23/2009
-2/26/2009
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
319650 2/2612009 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
6,430.41
205875
187444
5842.5512
74.29
205876
187445
5842.5515
92.63
205877
187434
5862.5515
39.07
205878
187433
5862.5512
126.44
205879
187440
5822.5515
1,863.40
205880
187436
5822.5513
7,516.73
206062
187435
5862.5512
1,198.45
206063
187429
5862.5513
31.55
206064
187430
5862.5515
1,909.30
206065
187441
5842.5513
414.04
206066
187439
5822.5512
19,696.31
'
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Page- 10
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
319651 "
212612009
104459 GS DIRECT
57.16
OCE PAPER 205822
255856
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSPECTIONS
57.18
319652
2/2612009
122919 HALLBERG ENGINEERING INC.
1,868.75
POOL VENTILATION ENGINEERING 206157
001822
5600.1740
MACHINERY 8 EQUIPMENT
EB /CL BALANCE SHEET
1,868.75
319653
2/26/2009
102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC
15,350.69
GASOLINE 00005413 205823
128658
1553.6581
GASOLINE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
15,350.69
319654
212612009
100797 HAWKINS INC.
3,688.90
CHEMICALS 00005755 205824
1275258
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
3,688.90
319655
2/2612009
122093 HEALTH PARTNERS
172,591.73
PREMIUM 205973
31530592
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
22,645.82
PREMIUM 205974
31529386
1550.6043
COBRA INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
195,237.55
319656
2/2612009
116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY
20.24
SPEAKER BAR 00004471 205825
45595966
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
276.90
LCD 00004471 205826
45594895
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
276.90
LCD 00004471 205826
45594895
5822.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
350.39
MONITOR 00004471 205826
45594895
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
924.43
CITY,
NA
2j'.° d 8:08:28
RS5CKREGG20000
Council Check Register,
Page - 11
2/23/2009
-212612009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation .
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description' `'
Business Unit
319657
2/2612009
103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS
35.68
TELESCOPING TUBE
00002163 206158
7248564
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
129.40
CLEANER, DUST CLOTHS
00002167 206159
2771803
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
165.08
319658
2126/2009
100805 . HIRSHFIELD'S
72.98
PAINT
00002172 206160
3329152
5620.6532
PAINT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
72.98
319659
2/2612009
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
472.15
205881
478048
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
751.15
205882
477408
5862.5514
COST. OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
300:80
206067
477920
5862.5514
COST OF:GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
493.50
206068
477903
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING '
2,017.60
319660
212612009
101774. HONEYWELL INC.
470.29
REPAIR ROOF VENT
00008019 205827
932651
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
470.29
319661
2/26/2009
101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC
218.86
CENTENNIAL LAKES BROCHURE
206022
29187
5631.6575
PRINTING.
CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION
218.86
319662
212612009
101426 HUGHES; GORDON
216.15
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
206023
022009
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ADMINISTRATION
216.15
319663
2126/2009
101183 INSPECTRON INC.
825.00
INSPECTION SERVICES
205828
NOV -DEC
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSPECTIONS
1,760.00
INSPECTION SERVICES
205978
NOV -DEC
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
;,INSPECTIONS
2,585.00.
319664
212612009.:
105051: INSTITUTE OF,TRANSP.,ORTATION EN
255.00
.MEMBERSHIP. -,JACK SULLIVAN..,
205829
021709
1260.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
255.00
319665
212612009
116152 INTERLACHEN COUNTRY
CLUB
327.55
HYDRANT USAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 205947
021909
5901.4626
SALE OF WATER
UTILITY REVENUES
327.55
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/23/2009 -2/26/2009
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
319666 2/2612009 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC.
312.00 LIFEGUARD INSTRUCTOR COURSE 206161 20039848 5310.6104
312.00
Subledger Account Description
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
2/2512009 8:08:28
Page - 12
Business Unit
POOL ADMINISTRATION
319667 2/26/2009
108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC.
2,310.00
FOAM 00003803 206162
156049
1470.6557
FIREFIGHTING FOAM
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,310.00
319668 2126/2009
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
1,008.00
205883
1243183
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,626.72
205884
1243178
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,297.50
206069
1252816
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
96.20
206070
2152818
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,889.20
206071
1252817
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
4,393.48
206072
1252824
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
60.55
206073
1252825
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
784.00
206074
936744
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
52.35-
206075
1048015
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
14,103.30
319670 2/26/2009
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
659.70
205885
1583791
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.59
205886
1572060
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
179.95
205887
1580149
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
659.70
205888
1583792
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
309.24
205889
1582590
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,103.84
205890
1582578
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,126.84
206076
1586529
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,141.45
206077
1586528
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
243.36
206078
1586527
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,505.18
206079
1586526
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
247.09
206080
1586531
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
62.21
206081
1586530
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
582.78
206082
1586532
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,642.16
206083
1586536
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4,084.00
206084
1586538
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2.24
206085
1586534
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,527.74
206086
1586539
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
102.11
206087
1586540
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,172.29
206088
1582587
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
235.57
206089
1582586
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
4,371.70
206090
1586543
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG, _jG20000 CITY. NA 2i. d 8:06:28
Council Check Register Page - 13
2/23/2009 --2126/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,392.73
206091
1586546
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,477.69
206092
1586542
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
81.12
206093
1586541
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,481.71
206094
1586535
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,420.39
206095
1586545
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
29,814.38
319671
2126/2009
102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP
69.51
ROXIO MEDIA CREATOR SOFTWARE
206189
020409
5125.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MEDIA STUDIO
69.51
319672
212612009
103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE
585.75
VACUUM CLEANER
205948
021009
5861.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON OCCUPANCY
585.75
319673
212612009
111018 KEEPRS INC.
479.96
UNIFORMS 00003785 206163
109364 -02
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
479.96
319674
212612009
100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN
92.52
MEETING EXPENSE
206024
021909
1600.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
92.52
319675
2/26/2009
105171 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO.
7,332.43
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11
205993
022709
05471.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
WM-471 NEW WELL #20
7,332.43
319676
2126/2009
124034 KILIAN, AMY
100.00
FIRST PLACE PRIZE
205949
021909
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
100.00
319677
2126/2009
115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE
62.25
PAPER
206025
022009
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
62.25
319678
212612009
124043 KONZ, MARYLOU
162.00
CLASS REFUND
206190
021809
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
162.00
319679
2/26/2009
123265 LANDWEHR CONSTRUCTION INC.
13,527.77
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6
205994
022709
10091.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge
13,527.77
R55CKREG LOG20000
205979
30156/30178
CITY OF EDINA
DATA PROCESSING
GENERAL (BILLING)
1,440.00
205979
30156130178
Council Check Register
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
42.00
205980
30321/30282/302
2/23/2009
— 2/26/2009
GENERAL (BILLING)
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
319680
2/2612009
1554.6160
123096 LASER TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
52
712.97
CONTRACTOR BROCHURES 205830
83451
1495.6575
PRINTING
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
712.97
52
319681
2/2612009
4,656.40
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
30321/30282/302
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
253.86
HEX NUTS, WIRE, WASHERS 00001808 205831
7748600
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
28,403.79
205980
121.55
WASHERS, SCREWS 00001883 206026
7774319
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
375.41
319682
212612009
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
220.00
LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE 205950
126151
1100.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
220.00
LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE 205951
126152
1100.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
440.00
319683
2/2612009
100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC.
1,052.69
HANGER & LEG ASSEMBLIES 00001463 206027
00041667
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1,052.69
319684
2126/2009
106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC.
89.70
COPIER USAGE 00001512 205832
160031
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
89.70
319685
2/26/2009
100858 LOGIS
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Page- 14
Business Unit
INSPECTIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
36.87
205979
30156/30178
5910.6160
DATA PROCESSING
GENERAL (BILLING)
1,440.00
205979
30156130178
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
42.00
205980
30321/30282/302
5910.6160
DATA PROCESSING
GENERAL (BILLING)
52
872.24
205980
30321/30282/302
1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
52
2,328.00
205980
30321/30282/302
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
52
4,656.40
205980
30321/30282/302
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
52
28,403.79
205980
30321/30282/302
1554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
52
37,779.30
319686 2126/2009 101165 MAA.O.
225.00 ANNUAL DUES (3) 206164 022309 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
225.00
R55CKREG �JG20000
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
319687 212612009
117839 MADISON, DAVE
1,085.00
OFFICIATING FEES
1,085.00
5842.5514
319688 2/26/2009
100868 MARK VII SALES
3,100.60
432839
2,357.90
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
1,878.51
205894
60.00
5862.5515
60.00
CREDIT TAKEN TWICE
1,358.75
505CREDIT
49.20
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
1,310.90
206096
1,436.08
5862.5514
40.00
VERNON SELLING
215.00
435089
11,866.94
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
319689 2126/2009
191.70
150,014.94
6,307.67
180.00
156,694.31
319690 2/26/2009
177.44
177.44
319691 212612009
1,666.73
1,666.73
319692 2126/2009
329.82
50.50
380.32
319693 2/2612009
241.13
241.13
CITY, NA
Council Check Register
2123/2009 -2/26/2009
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
206165 021809 4077.6103
Subledger Account Description
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Z. 9 8:08:28
Page - 15
Business Unit
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
205891
430467
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
205892
433554
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
205893
432839
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
205894
432840
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
205952
505CREDIT
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
206096
433052
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
206097
435089
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
206098
435088
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
206099
435284
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
206100
435285
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
206101
435283
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER.
YORK SELLING
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
PHONE CHANGES 205833 47532
70% OF NEW PHONE SYSTEM 205981 0063266 -IN
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 205982 0063279 -IN
ELEVATOR PHONE HOOK UP 205983 47275
101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC.
205834 607138752
100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
PLANTS 00002156 206166 45252
101483 MENARDS
NAILS, LUMBER 00001880 205953 13863
CLOTHS, BRUSH, PAINT PAIL 00001889 206028 14042
120605 METEORLOGIX
WEATHER INFORMATION 00001940 205835 2589996
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
44006.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
NEW PHONE SYSTEM
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK
1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION
1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Council Check Register
Page - 16
2/23/2009
— 2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319694
212612009
100885 METRO SALES INC
227.12-
COPIER - QUARTERLY BILLING 206191
315154
5110.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
227.12
319695
2126/2009
102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
53.00
OFFICIATING FEES 206192
3522
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
53.00
319696
2126/2009
102068 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRA
12,800.00
HOT WATER HEATER INSTALLATIO190002119 206167
204019766
5600.1720
BUILDINGS
EB /CL BALANCE SHEET
496.10
BOILER AQUASTAT 206168
204019750
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
13,296.10
319697
2126/2009
104650 MICRO CENTER
26.62
DVDRW 00004470 205836
2098990
1600.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
143.74
BULK CAT 6 CABLES 00004470 205836
2098990
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
170.36
319698
2/26/2009
100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR
87.93
CONTRACTOR BAGS 00003800 206169
8372693
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
87.93
319699
212612009
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
1,760.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001719 205954
33346
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,870.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001720 205955
33347
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
3,630.00
319700
2/2612009
101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
22,283.00
CONNECTION FEE 206029
2/12/09
5915.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
WATER TREATMENT
22,283.00
319701
2/2612009
115975 MINNESOTA LEGAL REGISTER
90.00
2009 SUBSCRIPTION 206170
022309
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
90.00
319702
212612009
101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
212.70
RUBBER METER GASKETS 00001332 205837
0235378
5917.6530
REPAIR PARTS
METER REPAIR
31.95
METER FLANGE GASKETS 00001705 205838
0235593
5917.6530
REPAIR PARTS
METER REPAIR
244.65
319703
2126/2009
118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS
197.00
NEWSPAPER INSERTS 205839
59018
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
CITY.
NA
Z. 9 8:08:28
R55CKREG . �JG20000
Council Check Register ."
Page - 17
2/2312009
-2/26/2009
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier /,Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
197.00
_ NEWSPAPER INSERTS,% „
205839
59018
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
"
197.00
NEWSPAPER INSERTS
205839
59018
5862.6122.
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
591.00
319704
2/26/2009
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO.
242.35
TANK, STEEL BANDS.
00001584 206030
0078897 -IN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
242.35
,319705
2/26/2009
101385 MITY -LITE INC
2,068.55
REPLACE CHAIRS . -
00008004 205840
IN- 484723
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
"2,068.55
319706
2126/2009
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
462.44
BEARINGS, SEALS
00006416 206031
653424 -00
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
462.44
319707
2/2612009
106662, NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS
775.85
PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE
206171
3847
5620.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH PARK
•
775.85
319708
2/2612009
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
236.50
205895
53672
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
236.50
319709
2/2612009
115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC.
'
167.00
SAFETY JACKETS
205841
NIA3891
1495.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
INSPECTIONS
167.00
319710
2126/2009
101620 NORTH SECOND STREET
STEEL SUPP
717.14
TUBES, PIPES
00001690 205842
145802
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
43.19 --
STEEL
00001685 205843
145801
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
760.33
319711
2/2612009
116114 OCE
170.19
OCE MAINTENANCE
205844
986678955
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSPECTIONS
170.19
OCE MAINTENANCE
205845
986719608
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSPECTIONS
340.38
.
319712
2/26/2009
102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG
434.85
206032
W09010607
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
20.62
ARNESON
206033
W09010600
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
41:24
GREENHOUSE
206033
W09010600
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000
2/26/2009
5862.5513
CITY OF
EDINA
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
78.38
Council Check Register
205956
021809
2/23/2009
-2/26/2009
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
72.59
206033
W09010600
5311.6188
TELEPHONE
82.48
206033
W09010600
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
84.33
206033
W09010600
5111.6188
TELEPHONE
103.10
319715
206033
W09010600
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
103.10
CARD ACCESS -PARKS
206033
W09010600
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
103.71
206033
W09010600
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
112.05
HISTORICAL
206033
W09010600
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
138.65
206033
W09010600
5210.6188
TELEPHONE
143.05
319716
206033
W09010600
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
206.20
206033
W09010600
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
222.37
206033
W09010600
1481.6188
TELEPHONE
566.16
206033
W09010600
5610.6188
TELEPHONE
2,434.50
2,270.51
206102
319713
2/26/2009
5862.5513
124037 OLSON, LYLA
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
78.38
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
205956
021809
78.38
319714
212612009
100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC.
2,050.00
INSTALL DAMPERS 00006255
206034
26985
962.50
SERVICE CONTRACT 00006209
206035
26865
3,012.50
319715
2/2612009
121026 PALDA & SONS INC.
1,963.94
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.9
205995
022709
1,965.74
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.9
205995
022709
34,043.63
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.9
205995
022709
37,973.31
319716
2/2612009
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
1,109.25
205896
8213195 -IN
3,909.51
205897
8213927 -IN
947.25
205898
8213925 -IN
2,270.51
206102
8213923 -IN
8,236.52
319717
2/26/2009
110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC.
1,145.00
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
205846
12409002
1,145.00
319718
2126/2009
105806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC.
234.84
K9 FOOD
205957
2084
1470.4329
5422.6180
5210.6230
01214.1705.30
01213.1705.30
05436.1705.30
AMBULANCE FEES
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Page - 18
Business Unit
POOL OPERATION
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
YORK OCCUPANCY
SKATING & HOCKEY
YORK FIRE STATION
ED ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO
PHASE 1 ARDEN. BRUCE, CASCO WM
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
R55CKREG _JG20000 CITY NA
Council Check Register
2123/2009 -2/26/2009
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
4607.6406
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
5822.5513
5822.5512
5822.5513
5842.5513
5842.5512
5842.5515
5862.5512
5862.5513
5822.6122
5842.6122
5862.6122
5842.5513
5822.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
1554.6230
05480.1705.20
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2, 9 8:08:28
Page - 19
Business Unit
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
234.84
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
319719 212612009
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
119372 PETSMART #463
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
81.70
K9 SUPPLIES 00003074
205958
T -3408
50TH ST SELLING
81.70
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
319720 2/2612009
YORK SELLING
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,749.60
205899
2717112
1,057.11
205900
2717110
1,248.18
205901
2717109
51.12
205902
2717104
9.33-
205903
3404482
6.25-
205904
3404690
232.38
206103
2720105
2,442.72
206104
2720104
3,266.47
206105
2720106
184.09
206106
2720107
42.24
206107
2720108
338.36
206108
2720110
4,958.24
206109
2720109
15,554.93
319721 2126/2009
124031 PLUS ONE SERVICES
137.38
PENS FOR REGISTERS
205847
2503
137.38
PENS FOR REGISTERS
205847
2503
137.40
PENS FOR REGISTERS
205847
2503
412.16
319722 2126/2009
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
962.30
205905
187443
990.35
205906
187438
1.15
206110
187262
486.40
206111
187432
2,440.20
319723 2/2612009
105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC.
5,904.18
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 00004474
205849
53091
5,904.18
319724 2/26/2009
100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
1,650.00
WELL HOUSE #20
205848
07037.15
1,650.00
4607.6406
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
5822.5513
5822.5512
5822.5513
5842.5513
5842.5512
5842.5515
5862.5512
5862.5513
5822.6122
5842.6122
5862.6122
5842.5513
5822.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
1554.6230
05480.1705.20
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2, 9 8:08:28
Page - 19
Business Unit
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
ADVERTISING OTHER
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CONSULTING DESIGN WM-480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2
R55CKREG LOG20000
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
CITY OF
EDINA
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2/23/2009
-2126/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
319725 2/26/2009
VERNON SELLING
100971 QUALITY WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
110.00
205907
120181 -00
5862.5514
1,989.60
205908
122055-00
5842.5513
3,121.95
205909
122621 -00
5642.5512
123.20
205910
122485-00
5842.5513
1,338.91
205911
122376-00
5842.5513
426.80
205912
122610 -00
5862.5512
370.80
205913
122611 -00
5822.5512
373.80
205914
122623 -00
5822.5512
1,672.90
205915
122056 -00
5822.5513
106.60
205916
122351 -00
5822.5513
746.00
205917
122525 -00
5822.5513
74.60-
205918
119666 -00
5822.5513
1,959.40
206112
122773 -00
5862.5513
533.00
206113
122345 -00
5862.5513
1,337.61
206114
122524 -00
5862.5513
3,678.92
206115
122622 -00
5862.5512
16.25-
206116
120922 -00
5842.5513
17,798.64
319726 212612009
123898 QWEST
132.96
952 285 -2951
205850
2951 -2109
1470.6188
132.96
319727 2126/2009
100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC.
108.90
OIL DYE
00006422
206036
CD1181615
5422.6530
769.90
BED KNIFE, BEARINGS
00006422
206037
CD1181640
5422.6530
878.80
319728 2/26/2009
100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING
121.00
TOILET REPAIRS
206193
10824
5111.6180
121.00
319729 2/26/2009
102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
25.50
BALL MOUNTS
00001818
205851
1010619 -01
1553.6530
25.50
319730 2/26/2009
122033 ROCKY BRANDS RETAIL
LLC
119.99
SAFETY BOOTS
00001941
205852
376873
1301.6610
134.99
SAFETY BOOTS
00001941
205852
376873
5913.6610
568.95
SAFETY BOOTS
00001941
205853
376869
5913.6610
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Page - 20
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
TELEPHONE
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
REPAIR PARTS
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
R55CKREG _JG20000
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY
iNA
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC'ASSOCIATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
Council Check Register
GENERAL' SUPPLIES
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
2/23/2009
—2/26/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier:/ Explanation PO'#
—
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
823.93
- 319731 2/2612009
101311 ROOT -0-MATIC SEWER SERVICE
410.00
FROZEN MANHOLE;SERVICE 00001428
205959
.29621
1646.6180
410.00
319732 212612009
118168 SANSIO
1,050.81
EMS SUBSCRIPTION
206172
INVO12197
1470.6160
1,050.81
319733- 2/26/2009
1240Xi SCHOENECKER, PAUL
67.48
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
205960
021809
5900.2015
67.48
319734 2/2612009
100995 SEH
593.48
COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ
206038
214172
08043.1705.21
791.31
COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ
206038
214172
08049.1705.21
1,780.45
COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ
206038
214172
04297.1705.21
2,769.59
COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ
206038
214172
03413.1705.21
4,451.12.
COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ
206038
214172
01213.1705.21
4,451.13
COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ
206038
214172
01214.1705.21
4,945.69
COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROD
206038
214172
05436.1705.21
19,782.77
319735 2/2612009
101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC.
800.77
SAW /STAND COMBO, HAMMERS 00001953'206039
134996
1301.6556 "
800.77
319736 2126/2009
912.50
36.50
437.00
312.00
46.00
1;744.00
319737 2126/2009
144.50
144.50
is 319738 2/26/2009
140.00
120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS
CHAMPIONSHIP JACKETS
CHAMPIONSHIP JACKET'
CHAMPIONSHIP JACKETS
CHAMPIONSHIP POLOS
CHAMPIONSHIP JACKETS
101000 SIR SPEEDY
POSTCARDS /MAILING
105099 SOUTHSIDEPRIDE
AD
205854 284716
205961 284997
206173 285240
206174 285241
206175- '285242
205855 59485
206041 26489
4077.6406
4077.6406
4077.6406
4077.6406
4077.6406
1265.6406
5210.6122
2, 79 8:08:28
Page - 21
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
CONTRACTED, REPAIRS- BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
CONSULTING INSPECTION
CONSULTING INSPECTION
CONSULTING INSPECTION
CONSULTING INSPECTION
CONSULTING - INSPECTION
CONSULTING INSPECTION
CONSULTING, INSPECTION
L-43 COUNTRY CLUB
L-49
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS
PHASE 1 ARDEN,•BRUCE,'CASCO
PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN
PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE; CASCO WM
TOOLS GENERAL; MAINTENANCE
..GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC'ASSOCIATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
GENERAL' SUPPLIES
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM
R55CKREG LOG20000
100.00
CITY OF EDINA
206128
022109
5610.6136
Council Check Register
ED ADMINISTRATION
2/23/2009 — 2/2612009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
140.00
319741
2/26/2009
319739 2/26/2009
124029 STERICYCLE
100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC
234.77
ALARM REPAIRS 206176
6140350 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
234.77
TESTING FOR CARBON
205984
319740 2126/2009
10039.1705.20
102170 STAR OF THE NORTH CONCERT BAND
LS39 STATION 6 ODOR CONTROL
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Page - 22
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00
ENTERTAINMENT 3/1/09
206128
022109
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
319741
2/26/2009
124029 STERICYCLE
185.00
TESTING FOR CARBON
205984
203198
10039.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
LS39 STATION 6 ODOR CONTROL
185.00
319742
2/26/2009
102639 STROHMYER, TOM
150.00
ENTERTAINMENT 3/5/09
206130
022109
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
319743
2%26/2009
104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK
SOLUTIONS
587.49
ART CENTER WIRING
205985
13572
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
2,282.61
YORK LIQUOR WIRING
205986
13571
5841.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK OCCUPANCY
2,870.10
319744
212612009
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
94.56
COVER KIT
00001563 205962
149790CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
94.56
319745
2/26/2009
121681 SUMMIT CONSULTING
3,409.18
FIRE ALARM ENGINEERING
206177
1266165
5600.1720
BUILDINGS
EB /CL BALANCE SHEET
3,409.18
319746
2/26/2009
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
504.00
PHONE # CHANGE AD
00016102 205963
1154364
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
504.00
PHONE # CHANGE AD
00016102 205964
1155500
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,200.00
GOLF ADS
00016102 206040
1160933
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
2,208.00
319747
2/26/2009
101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC.
1,000.00
RMS AUDIT
206178
14497
4608.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM
86,313.17
2009 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
206179
14716
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
87,313.17
R55CKREG - jG20000
1,495.00
CITY.
NA
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,495.00
Council Check Register
2/23/2009
-2/26/2009
102300 TCALMC
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
319748
212612009
021909
110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
425.00
35.00
WIRELESS REPAIR SERVICE 205965
23820
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
319752 2/26/2009
35.00
319749
2/26/2009
196.83
120931 SURGE WATER CONDITIONING
205966
52618 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
279.19
SOFTENER SALT 00002157 206180
108554
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
279.19
334.17
319750
2/26/2009
120998 SURLY BREWING CO.
319753 2/2612009
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Z. A 8:08:28
Page - 23
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
1,495.00
205919
JM7243
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,495.00
319751 2/26/2009
102300 TCALMC
425.00
LMC TRAINING FOR 5
206042
021909
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
425.00
319752 2/26/2009
101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
196.83
SWITCHES 00001689
205966
52618 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
137.34
FUSES, LAMPS, SWITCHES 00001687
205967
52770 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
334.17
319753 2/2612009
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
52.65
205920
528990
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
4,277.85
205921
528991
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
143.45
206117
530552
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,628.10
206118
529967
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
6,102.05
319754 2/2612009
120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC.
33.33
WEB SITE AD
205968
2009 -31868
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
33.33
WEB SITE AD
205968
2009 -31868
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
33.34
WEB SITE AD
205968
2009 -31868
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
500.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
205969
2009 -27389
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
500.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
205969
2009 -27389
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
500.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
205969
2009 -27389
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
1,600.00
319755 2/26/2009
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
41.61
WELDING SHIELDS 00002390
206043
253692
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
41.61
319756 2126/2009
101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
2/25 /2009 8:08:28
Council Check
Register
Page - 24
2/23/2009
-2/26/2009
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
80.00
206119
216009
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
80.00
319757 2/2612009
101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
165.00
SHADE TREE COURSE
205971
HORWATH
1644.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TREES & MAINTENANCE
80.00
SHADE TREE COURSE
00001425 205972
OVERHOLT
1644.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TREES & MAINTENANCE
245.00
319758 2126/2009
100050 USPS- HASLER
1,000.00
IMS #202739
205970
021709
1400.6235
POSTAGE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,000.00
319759 2/26/2009
122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC
220.61
OXYGEN
00003649 206181
366853
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
221.92
OXYGEN
00003649 206182
364089
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
91.65
OXYGEN
00003649 206183
371177
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
534.18
319760 2126/2009
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
111.13
BOWLS
00001651 205856
109633 -01
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
16.00-
CREDIT
205857
11 1793C
5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
122.69
CAN LINERS
00006001 206044
111720 -00
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
217.82
319761 2/26/2009
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
26.39
206184
1972201448
1490.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH
36.44
206184
1972201448
1640.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
39.56
206184
1972201448
1120.6188
TELEPHONE
ADMINISTRATION
126.59
206184
1972201448
1600.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
277.84
206184
1972201448
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
506.82
319762 2/26/2009
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
22.65
SAFETY GLASSES
00001825 205858
222524
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
25.00
SAFETY GLASSES
00001783 205859
222491
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
55.89
SAFETY GLASSES
00001783 205859
222491
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION
103.54
319763 2/26/2009
102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC
5,700.00
RAMP CERTIFICATIONS
206045
21356000001
1260.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
5,700.00
R55CKREG -)G20000
CITY
NA
2 A 8:08:28
Council Check Register
Page - 25
2/23/2009
-- 2126/2009
Check #
Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
319764
2/26/2009
121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING
154.96
MEMBERSHIP CARDS 00009472
206194
23258
5110.6575
PRINTING
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
154.96
319765
212612009
123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC
279.00
LOCATE WATER LEAK 00001721
206046
1187
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
279.00
319766
212612009
101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
70.29
HANDLES FOR HOIST 00001961
206047
0038924 -IN
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
70.29
319767
2/26/2009
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
1,225.25
205922
212218 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
400.40
206120
212220 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
577.25
206121
212339 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,202.90
319768
2126/2009
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
770.96
205923
263208
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
164.99
205924
263206
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
168.24
205925
262453
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
816.33
206122
264096
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
557.60
206123
264097
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,443.12
206124
264099
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
603.34
206125
264100
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,207.57
206126
264098
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
6,732.15
319769
2126/2009
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
3,906.70
205926
224866
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,101.90
206127
224869
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,008.60
319770
2126/2009
102325 WORLD WATERPARK ASSOCIATION
39.00
ADVERTISING & PROMOTIONAL DVD
206048
09- PROMOCD
5310.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POOL ADMINISTRATION
39.00
319771
2/26/2009
105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
819.00
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
205987
6- 1/20109
1260.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
504.00
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW
205988
18- 1/20/09
1260.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
516.00
TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
205989
19- 1/20/09
1260.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
2,380.50
4,219.50
319772 212612009
3,580.60
891.48
4,472.08
319773 2126/2009
79.04
79.04
1,096,009.38
Supplier / Explanation
70TH ST ROUNDABOUTS
101726 XCEL ENERGY
51- 6227619 -3
51- 5605640 -1 BAL DUE
122316 ZACK'S INC.
SHOVELS
Grand Total
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/23/2009 —2/26/2009
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
205990 23- 1/20109 01336.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION
205860 184943475 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER
205991 5900 PARK PL 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER
00001641 205861 24730
1301.6556 TOOLS
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 1,096,009.38
Total Payments 1,096,009.38
2/25/2009 8:08:28
Page - 26
Business Unit
BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK
CENTENNIAL LAKES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKSUM . X20000 CITY L JA 2/. j 8:09:59
Council Check Summary Page - 1
2123/2009 - 2/26/2009
Company
Amount
01000
GENERAL FUND
453,785.46
02200
COMMUNICATIONS FUND
4,226.09
04000
WORKING CAPITAL FUND
232,683.80
04800
CONSTRUCTION FUND
13,527.77
05100
ART CENTER FUND
1,925.65
05200
GOLF DOME FUND
3,368.86
05300
AQUATIC CENTER FUND
462.62
05400
GOLF COURSE FUND
7,762.79
05500
ICE ARENA FUND
3,902.57
05600
EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND
58,006.17
05800
LIQUOR FUND
169,843.28
05900
UTILITY FUND
107,311.81
05930
STORM SEWER FUND
39,182.51
05950
RECYCLING FUND
20.00
Report Totals 1,096,009.38
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
With the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing Policies and
procedures dat
City
I
N
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: Correspondence Received
Since Last Council Meeting
Info /Background:
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item VII.
Consent ❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Discussion
Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT OF MINNESOTA
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
MARK S. THOMPSON
DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATION
12TH FLOOR COURTS TOWER
HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 -0421
(612) 346 -7757
FAX (612) 348 -2131
February 23, 2009
James Hovland, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 W 50th St
Edina, MN 55424 -1330
Dear Mayor Hovland:
RECEIVED
FEB 2 7 2009
1 D C
\LE D
U NpR ••�
W
ZI�HNE100
As you know, the Minnesota legislative session is turning into an unprecedented discussion on
budget reductions in all three branches of government. I am writing to inform you of the serious
budgetary challenge we currently face at Hennepin County District Court (HCDC) and how it
may affect your municipality.
In preparation for potential further budget cuts, the Minnesota Judicial Branch prepared a list of
low- priority activities that are either not constitutionally - mandated or do not significantly affect
an individual's access to the courts.
Ceasing two of these activities would have a significant impact on the municipalities of
Hennepin County:
Disposition of non - moving (mostly parking) violations. This change would largely
affect the city of Minneapolis but also suburbs where there are a substantial number of
parking violations; and
Disposition of all moving violations (including fine collection). This change is of
greater concern and could result in a lower amount of revenue to the municipalities than
what they previously received from HCDC.
In FY 2008, HCDC's budget was $46.9 million, while it collected and disbursed $52.3 million.
As noted in the enclosure, HCDC returned almost $16.5 million of this revenue to the
municipalities of Hennepin County. (The rest went to the state General Fund and various
governmental agencies / subdivisions.)
It is very likely that a proposal for further budget cuts to the courts would render us unable to
handle the types of cases that generate most of this revenue, which your city depends on in part
for essential public safety services. Doing some simple math, Hennepin County District Court
collects about the same amount of revenue countywide as it takes for municipalities to fund
about 230 police officers.
Mayor James Hovland
February 23, 2009
Page Two
While it is certainly possible to transfer some of these enforcement and collection responsibilities
from HCDC to the municipalities in which the violations occurred, doing so would require you
to establish new administrative mechanisms.
We are regularly meeting with members of the Hennepin County legislative delegation to
explain the highly adverse consequences of further cuts to the court's budget.
Please call or e-mail me if y - u have specific questions. Otherwise, any communication of your
concerns would best be eq�d to your state legislators or the Governor's office.
Sincerely,
Mark S. Thompson
Judicial District Administrator
Hennepin County District Court /
Fourth Judicial District
(612) 348 -7757
mark.thompson@courts.state.nm.us
Enclosure
C: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
Police Chief Michael Siitari
Revenue collected by Hennepin County District Court
for the municipalities of Hennepin County (FY 2008)
Bloomington
963,829.36
Brooklyn Center
280,419.45
Brooklyn Park
543,661.46
Champlin
347,805.39
Corcoran
37,033.50
Crystal
146,959.17
Dayton
39,685.99
Deephaven
44,042.39
Eden Prairie
424,650.13
Edina
909,228.06
Excelsior
56,791.16
Golden Valley
207,273.91
Greenfield
14,869.58
Greenwood
6,742.40
Hanover
4,213.20
Hassan
Township
27,638.72
Hopkins
178,059.55
Independence
36,652.65
Long Lake
15,000.89
Loretto
5,847.94
Maple Grove
411,323.37
Maple Plain
15,939.30
Medina
153,529.82
Minneapolis
8,376,717.32
Minnetonka
527,556.22
Minnetonka
Beach
3,780.88
Minnetrista
56,902.64
Mound
44,903.47
New Hope
269,695.94
Orono
106,663.01
Osseo
87,619.56
Plymouth
896,452.13
Richfield
329,546.86
Robbinsdale
179,880.68
Rockford
2,593.31
Rogers
97,729.45
Shorewood
56,162.00
Spring Park
18,786.87
St. Anthony
125,025.52
St. Bonifacius
13,139.28
St. Louis Park
281,512.19
Tonka Bay
8,347.68
Wayzata
87,987.60
Woodland
3,252.90
TOTAL
16,445,452.90
RECEIVED
FEB 2 7 2009
2/20/09
To: Mayor James Hovland
Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot
Housh and Ann Swenson.
City Manager Gordon Hughes
City Attorney Roger Knutson
Edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Dick Whitbeck
Re: 6120 Brookview Ave
We are deeply concerned about our situation with the JMS
property at 6120 Brookview Ave. So far, the Brookview neighbors
have won the battles but are we losing the war?
Three issues:
Certificate of Occupancy
Edina Chamber "sponsored" Open House March 6, 2009
Future litigation in court
My understanding is that JMS must have a Certificate of
Occupancy in order to participate in the Parade Of Homes.
It is our belief that JMS should be denied this even if it is a
temporary C.O. based on the actions of JMS to date unless there
is some legal foundation compelling our city to grant this to ]MS.
At the Edina Chamber of Commerce luncheon this past
Wednesday, A fellow chamber member brought up the 6120
Brookview issue totally unaware that I was being affected by this
ongoing travesty.
After I explained my relationship to this issue, she brought to my
attention the fact that JMS was hosting a Chamber event called
"At Your Business Break" on March 6th. Coincidentally, Cary
Teague and Mary Brindle were seated at the same table.
I am quite certain the Chamber had no idea what was / is going
on here but it seems ridiculous for the Chamber to be part of an
event where the host is suing the city. This is simply another
example of the arrogance displayed by JMS.
I did speak with Mary Brindle about this and decided to let it take
its course.
When JMS filed suit against the city, none of us were informed
that this was going to be heard in court on either of the two
occasions. I strongly believe that the residents could have
provided testimony that may have ended the problem right then.
There were clearly many many facts that the neighbors
uncovered that were not presented in court.
Our concern is that we will unintentionally be denied. our right to
participate in any formal or informal court proceedings in the
future.
Finally, can someone please explain to us what is the process
going forward? As I am writing this, JMS is doing some major
digging with heavy equipment.
Your reply would be deeply appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Respectfully yours,
Dick Whitbeck
RECEIVED
FEB 2 7 2009
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:57 AM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: Susan Heiberg
Subject: FW: Memo to Edina Council /ETC/ SRF
Page 1 of 1
From: Looieruth @aol.com [mailto:Looieruth @ aol.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:43 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Memo to Edina Council /ETC/ SRF
There is a column on the Opinion of
Tribune by Dave V
have been p omoted by the
morning edition that really expla ins the g ene
Greater 70th Street Organization for many months.
1 suggest it be required reading for the Council and members of the ETC as we go forward
on the decisions under review..
Ruth C. Johnson
You can't always choose whom you love, but you can choose how to find them. Start with AOL Personals.
Page 1 of 1:
RECEIVED
FEB 2 71009
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sernt: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:15 AM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: Susan Heiberg
Subject: FW: Bike lanes on 70th - YES!! Thank you.
From: Vaughn Asselstine [rnailto:vaughn052 @rnsn.coM3
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:04 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Bike lanes on 70th - YES!! Thank you.
Thank you for your support of bike lanes on W 70th Street. Bravo! Well done!
I live on Ellsworth Dr, which is South of W 70th, and have been involved in the study of W 70th
over the last two years. It is a tough problem and I appreciate the work lots of people have put
into this. But the solution is such a watered -down compromise that it is practically guaranteed to
be ineffective.
The problem is that the people on W 70th want to live on a regular residential street. And they do
not.
So the two things they want are mutually exclusive:
1. Car - friendly streets (on- street parking, uninhibited right /left hand turns into their driveways, no
roundabouts)
2. Less traffic
But we all know (Easy Driving) = (Lots of Traffic) + (No Bikes)
Meanwhile, many of who live in the neighborhood but not on 70th, want less car traffic
and more pedestrian and bike traffic. We live within a mile of everything we need - shopping,
Testaraunts, coffee shops, bookstores, the YMCA; Southdale library, Fairview Southdale Hospital,
medical /dental offices, banks, Cenntenial Lakes, Target, Cub, Byerly's, Walgreen s, Kinko's, movie
theaters, you name it. It's a big small town down here. This area could be a pedestrian /biker
paradise (ok, except for -30 wind chills for a couple weeks).
So thank you for voting in favor of the bike lanes on 70th. That was a vote to put the interests of
the larger community first. I have sympathy for the people who bought houses on 70th St and are
now unhappy with the traffic. But I really believe that they are better off with bikers rolling by on
the path in front of their house than the traffic that is guaranteed to keep zooming by.
Sincerely,
Vaughn Asselstine
Susan Heiberg
am:
Lynette Biunno
Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:32 PM
Sent:
To:
Wayne Houle
Cc:
Susan Heiberg
FW: Regarding the 70th Street Project
Subject:
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Gary Soule Emailto :gsoulelCacomcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:29 PM
To: Lynette Siunno
Subject: Regarding the 70th Street Project
To the Mayor and City Council Members;
RECEIVED
FEB 2 7 2009
We were not able to attend the February 16, meeting. We have only heard from other sources the result of
your actions on the recommendations of the planning committee regarding the 70th street project. We
certainly hope that a stop light at West Shore is done as a part of the initial changes. It is very frustrating
and dangerous to attempt turns to the west while facing north at the intersection of 70th and West Shore
Drive.
sincerely,
&cry & Susan Soule
7324 West Shore Drive
1
RECEIVED
FEB 17 2009
2 -26 -09
Dear Edina Engineering Department and City Council:
Last summer our driveway was reconstructed as part of the sidewalk installation on
Halifax Avenue. While I appreciate the efforts of the City to continue winter
accessibility which had been possible since 1976, those efforts have not been
successful. Our driveway remains the steepest and most treacherous on the street
and has been made even more difficult because of the sidewalk. I cannot get a run
at the driveway as in the past 32 years because the sidewalk impedes my
momentum. Before our driveway was altered, I could always get up and into my
garage if the concrete surface was reasonably clear. This access was possible with all
the cars which we have owned over the years. Now, I cannot.
On December 23, 2008, I arrived home after a modest snowfall at about 7PM. I
shoveled, scraped, and salted to no avail. I attempted to use my next door
neighbor's driveway (5109 Halifax) in order to get my car off the street and could
not get up theirs either because the sidewalk stopped my momentum. I finally went
to Jerry's Hardware to purchase sand. Once again I scraped the driveway surface,
applied the 40 pounds of sand, and finally after 2 hours of effort was barely able to
make it up the driveway to the safety and shelter of the garage. I felt infuriated,
exhausted, and victimized.
Today upon arrival at about IPM, my husband cleared the driveway of snow, but I
was not able to get up after repeated tries because my forward momentum was
stopped at the sidewalk. My car is currently sitting on the street in a snowstorm in
limited visibility and vulnerable to damage. My car is equipped with Quadri -Trac
which is more efficient than front -wheel drive; the car was chosen with that
capability in order to be able to access the driveway under winter conditions. The car
has performed admirably on the driveway in the winter until this winter.
I was assured last summer that if the new driveway was not satisfactory, it would be
changed. The new driveway is not satisfactory and, I ask that it be changed so that I
do not have to endure another winter wondering if I will be able to access my
property safely with reasonable effort.
Thank you so much for your consideration in this issue.
Sincerely,
Lynda Carlson
5105 Halifax
952 - 926 -7378
Subject: RE: Driveway
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:27:08 -0600
RECEIVED
FEB 2 71009
4212 Alden Drive
Edina, MN 55416
February 25, 2009
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50' Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear City Council Members:
I am writing about the zoning compliance issues and what I feel to be some negative
outcomes for the Morningside neighborhood and the City of Edina related to the
construction of the Calvin Christian School expansion last fall.
First, I have no objection to the location of the school or the Calvin Christian School
itself. It was part of the Morningside neighborhood when I bought my house and I
welcome it as an ongoing part of our neighborhood. I do, however, object strenuously to
the structure that was built last fall.
First of all, the blue metal material seems out of synch with the residential nature of our
neighborhood. It is my understanding that the blue metal was not presented in the plans
that were originally supplied to the City of Edina.
Secondly, the scale of the structure in terms of height now dominates the park landscape
and, as I understand it, is in violation of the zoning for the site. The combination of scale
issues in conjunction with the commercial appearance of the upper portion of the building
has permanently and negatively altered the visual landscape of the park.
Lastly, the tall lit light pole at night further creates a commercial feel in our park.
As a dog walker and regular park user this is a diminishment of my quality of life in our
neighborhood and I am disturbed by this and the seeming ambivalence of the City
Council related to same. Parks are a critical amenity in our community and I think the
Edina. City Council did not represent well many of its constituents who utilize the park or
the legacy of park preservation and enhancement. Instead we have experienced park
degradation.
I am a supporter of efforts to regulate mcmansions in Edina in appropriate reasonable
ways. I find it upsetting and ironic, however, that the City of Edina is comfortable with
the notion of regulating tax payers of single family homes but the City does not take
reasonable care to regulate thoughtfully the construction of a major structure that effects
directly the look and feel within one of its major parks, Weber Field.
At the very least, the City of Edina should require the Calvin Chtristian School, which I
understand does not pay any taxes to the City of Edina, to pay for the expense of planting
some additional trees as part of a thoughtful landscape plan. Over time the trees would
soften the look of the school from the southern exposure. Absent undertaking this type of
reasonable action, I respectfully request that the City of Edina appropriate the necessary
funds for a thoughtful landscape design and installation to accomplish this objective.
With all due respect, in my estimation the City of Edina and the current City Council has
a public service obligation to help reduce the scope of the problem that it allowed to be
created.
I respectfully request a response from someone at the City to this letter.
Yours ly,
k Gittleman
cc: Tim Hovland, Mayor
RECEIVED
FEB 2 7 2009
February 23, 2009
Mayor James Hovland
City of Edina
4801 West 50" Street
Edina, MN 55424
CommonBond 1J �
COMMUNITIES
328 Kellogg Boulevard W
St. Paul, MN 55102 -1900
RE: Yorkdale Townhomes
- Notice of County Funding Application for Housing
Dear Mayor Hovland,
651 -291 -1750 Phone
651 -291 -1003 Fax
www.commonbond.org
CommonBond Communities is a mission -drive non - profit organization that provides
affordable housing as a stepping -stone to success. We have owned and operated Yorkdale
Townhomes at 7429 York Avenue for over 30 years. Currently, we are exploring options
for renovating and redeveloping the family apartments at the development.
As we have begun the process of applying for project funding for this development, we
would like to inform you that we have made requests for public financing through the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for housing tax credits and loans as well as to
Hennepin County for HOME funds.
If you have any questions about this proposal or any of om m nBe at 651-291-1750 or
affordable housing options in Edina, please feel free
Ellen Higginsncommonbond.org.
Sincerely, I `
ze&i to?�
Ellen Higgins
Vice President
An E,iuJI (11'I'oitt!ni0/
AIf ii mcinvc Action l)r� etnt iti
RECEIVED CommonBond
TIES
FEB 2 7 2009 COMMUNI 328 Kellogg Boulevar '
St. Paul, MN 55102 -,
651 =291 -1750 Phone
651 - 291 -1003 Fax
February 23, 2009, www.commonbond.org
Mayor James Hovland
City of Edina
4801 West 5e Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Southdale YMCA Redevelopment
Notice of County Funding Application for Housing
Dear Mayor Hovland,
As you are aware, the City Council recently approved the preliminary site planning and
zoning for the Southdale YMCA redevelopment at 7355 York Avenue with the inclusion
of 130 units of housing to be developed by CommonBond Communities. We were very
encouraged by the response of the Planning Commission, the Council and local citizens
to our proposal and are excited to move forward with development plans for this site.
CommonBond Communities is a mission -drive non -profit organization that provides
affordable housing as a stepping -stone to success. Our proposed housing at the YMCA
site will provide quality apartments for families and individuals with disabilities and
families with low, moderate and above - average incomes.
As we have begun the process of applying for project funding for this development, we
would like to inform you that we have made requests for public financing through the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for housing tax credits and loans as well as to
Hennepin County for HOME funds.
If you have any questions about this proposal or any of CommonBond's other successful
affordable housing options in Edina, please feel free to contact me at 651- 291 -1750 or
Ellen Higginsgcommonbond.org.
Sincerely,
Z'&_0_J
Ellen Higgins
Vice President
At] Lyuul 0111100 twain'/
Afhrmu ivi A00011 olgar.i,at�(
RECEIVED
FEB 2 6 2009
2 -23 -09
7204 Monardo Lane
Edina, MN 55435
Edina City Council Members
Edina City Hall
4801 W 5& Street
Edina, MN 55424
Member's,
The elimination of the free right at Highway 100 & 70'' Street is a good idea and a real
safety plus, but the idea to hold up on the stop light at West Shore would be a bad decision. The
installation of a stop light or 4 way stop signs is
haveunrestricted run from 00 to Cornelia. from
the west side of 100. If there is no stop sign, y
People on West Shore need a safe chance to enter or cross 70''' Street.
The idea of a roundabout at Valley View is a complete waste of money because there is
no problem there.
Regarding bike lanes and on street parking, I feel that we could have bike lanes on both
sides and street parking on one side (probably the South side because there are more houses on
that side that would benefit).
Sincerely, 7 p
Leonard M. Larson
RECEIVED
February 15, 2009 FEB 2 6 20
Mr. Erik Amundson
Edina Police Department
4801 W. 50& Street
Edina, MN 55424
Erik —
I think you did a wonderful job presenting your speech re Identity Theft to the Edina Rotary on
February 5, 2009.
I heard many fine comments and recommendations after the speech and even into the following
week.
Thank you so much.
r
im VanValkenburg
cc: Mayor Jim Hovland
Chief Mike Sittan
Gordon Hughes
P.S. Would you like to give this presentation at noon on 9/16/09 to a smaller group?
February 23, 2009
Mr. Robert A. Keller
6772 Valley View Road
Edina, MN 55439
RE: Sidewalk along Valley View Road
Letter of February 18, 2009
Dear Mr. Keller:
RECEIVED
FEB_ 2 6 2009
City of Edina
Thank you for your letter regarding the condition of the sidewalk along Valley View
Road. One of our Street Team Leaders - John Scheerer will be contacting you shortly
regarding this section of sidewalk. Sidewalks along designated Municipal State Aid
routes, which Valley View Road is designated, are maintained by the City.
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952-
826 -0443 or at whoule(abci.edina.mn.us.
Sincerely,
G X,01
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
C: John Scheerer — City of Edina
Gordon Hughes — City of Edina
Edina City Council
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET www.cityofedina.com
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
February 18, 2009
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50`s Street
Edina, MN 55424
Attention: Wayne Houle, City Engineer and Director of Public Works
In the summer of 2008 the street drain in front of our lot located at 6772 Valley View
Road was repaired. The repair was necessary due to water erosion around the storm
sewer drain. The street water from Valley View Road drains to the Rosemary Lane
holding pond from this location. The city crew did a good job with the repair of the
broken file and cement foundation.
For the past four to five years the sidewalk has begun to sink in front of the area where
the street drain was repaired. Today the slope to the street side of the sidewalk is three to
four inches lower than its original grade. Water and ice form on the lower area of the
sidewalk and this represents a very dangerous walking situation.
The school children use the sidewalk to travel to the middle school and the high school.
In addition, adults use the sidewalk to travel to the commuter bus stop at Antrim Road
and for much of the winter months this travel occurs during hours of darkness. Other
adults use this sidewalk for their morning and evening exercise trips. I have seen people
fall on the ice which forms in the low area of the sidewalk because the ice cannot be
detected when there is snow cover.
The sidewalk foundation has been eroding over the years because of the street drain
damage and it will only become worse if it is not corrected. Please review and correct
this problem before someone is seriously injured.
T ou for your consideration.
c
Robert A. Kell
6772 Valley View Road .
Edina, MN 55439
(952) 941 -7351
CC Edina City Council
RECEIVED
FEB 10 1009
February 18, 2009
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50'h Street
Edina, MN 55424
Attention: Wayne Houle, City Engineer and Director of Public Works
In the summer of 2008 the street drain in front of our lot located at 6772 Valley View
Road was repaired. The repair was necessary due to water erosion around the storm
sewer drain. The street water from Valley View Road drains to the Rosemary Lane
holding pond from-this location. The city crew did a good. job with the repair of the
broken tile and cement foundation.
For the past four to five years the sidewalk has begun to sink in front of the area where
the street drain was repaired. Today the slope to the street side of the sidewalk is three to
four inches lower than its original grade. Water and ice form on the lower area of the
sidewalk and this represents a very dangerous walking situation.
The school children use the sidewalk to travel to the middle school and the high school.
In addition, adults use the sidewalk to travel to the commuter bus stop at Antrim Road
and for much of the winter months this travel occurs during hours of darkness. Other
adults use this sidewalk for their morning and evening exercise trips. I have seen people
fall on the ice which forms in the low area of the sidewalk because the ice cannot be
detected when there is snow cover.
The sidewalk foundation has been eroding over the years because of the street drain
damage and it will only become worse if it is not corrected. Please review and correct
this problem before someone is seriously injured
Thank you for your consideration.
Robert A. Keller
6772 Valley View Road
Edina, MN 55439
(952) 941 -7351
CC Edina City Council
RECEIVED
FEB 191009
To Whom It May Concern,
Over the last couple of years, I have been noticing that a lot of the City Council's
time and energy has been taken up by unhappy residents who live on W 70th St. I
was born and raised in Edina, and, in 2007 moved back to my hometown. I am a
3rd generation Edina resident and homeowner. I am also self employed in real
estate. I read in today's paper that the city of Edina is taking written comments
from residents regarding how to proceed with 70th St issues, and I wanted to put my
two cents in.
I am now 34 years old and I always remember 70th St being a 'busy' street. It has
always been a means of getting from Hwy 100 to the busy commercial area where
Southdale, etc., is located. This is hardly a recent development. Southdale as been
in the area since the 1950s and 70th St was and continues to be how shoppers got
to the mall.
Everyone should be responsible for their own choices and decisions. If you purchase
a home on a busy street or main thoroughfare, as the homeowners on W 70th Street
have done, they most certainly got a discount on the price because of it. It is
common knowledge that a home that is situated on a busy street is not worth as
much as one on a quiet street. If someone is bothered by traffic noise, or doesn't
like the fact that they might have to wait for a break in traffic to pull out of their
driveway, then they should have forseen this and should not have purchased a home
on a busy street like 70th St. I, personally, did not want those issues, so I
purchased on a quiet street in Edina, but, of course, I paid for that amenity when I
purchased the home.
Why residents of 70th Street think the taxpayers of Edina should have to pay for
their personal decision to buy real estate on a busy street, and /or mitigate the
obvious consequences of such a decision, is beyond me. Every city is going to have
busy streets and major thoroughfares. It is a necessity. As a resident of Edina, I
want people to be able to access our commercial areas from our highways without
too much ado and frustration. I don't want to deter people from shopping and
visiting our city's shops and stores. Each individual homeowner can decide for
themselves whether to live on such a thoroughfare (at a discounted price) and deal
with it's inconveniences or pay more to live on a less traveled road. It is everyone's
choice, but a choice does exist.
If we spend our tax money on this, then where does it end? Are we also responsible
to 'fix' traffic issues on France Ave? Vernon Ave? To help boost property values of
those who chose to buy on these busy streets as well?
While I understand the desire to slow speedy drivers, I can't understand how
spending money on roundabouts and other unneccessary things are going to help
anyone. The fact is that 70th St will still be used by people who want to get to the
commercial area of Edina via Hwy 100. There are not any other direct routes from
Hwy 100 that are a straight shot to Southdale and nearby malls. These 'solutions'
are just going to clog traffic and cause accidents. This is the midwest USA, not
Paris. I've almost been hit numerous times by drivers near the Galleria and Target
that have no idea how roundabouts work.
If the homeowners on 70th Street do not like living on a busy street, then I have a
solution for each one of them: move. Cost to taxpayers: $0. There will be buyers
who don't mind the traffic and /or want to live in Edina but can't afford the homes on
the quiet streets.
As for the bike path issues: living on or near a bike path is considered a plus, not a
negative, and should not hurt property values for those living on 70th St. If
anything, it might make the homes more desirable.
Thanks for your time,
Mary O'Neill Bona
See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of your
life. See Now
Susan Heiber
From:
Sent:
Lynette Biunno
Thursday, February 19, 2009 12:49 PM
To:
Wayne Houle
Susan Heiberg RECEIVED
Cc:
Subject:
FW: Bike lanes on 70th
FEB 19 2009
- -- Original Message---- -
From: Lorenzo Tunesi Emailto :lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 12:47 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Bike lanes on 70th
Dear City Council members,
I fully support your decision to include bike lanes on West 70th Street. The neighborhood is not only
comprised of people living on 70th but of many other people who would like to safely be able to use bike lanes
in their area.
Thank you for that courageous decision.
Lorenzo Tunesi
4413 Ellsworth Drive
Edina, MN 55435
1
RECEIVED
FEB 17 7009
To Whom It May Concern:
My address is 6121 Oaklawn Avenue and I share the back property line with 6120
Brookview.
I know well, it is always easier to ask forgiveness then permission, when you know
the answer will be "no ". Isn't that what ]MS has done?
I have been reading in the paper for the past several years about the controversies
with building in Edina. I know it has been challenge for the Planning Commission and
City Council to keep everyone happy. But it seems to me here are clear cases of rule
violations... why have rules and laws if you are not going to uphold them?
I understand the the city is changing ... but if you decided to not act according to the
law on this, I would think you are openning Pandora's box with building codes and
city planning.
Thank you, Kristine Smyth
Windows Live TM: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 8:38 AM
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: Susan Heiberg RECEIVED
Subject: FW: Bike lanes on 70th St.
FEB 15 2009
- -- Original Message---- -
From: dwaine lindberg [ mailto:dlindberg76@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:59 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Cc: Kirk Johnson
Subject: Bike lanes on 70th St.
I want to commend the Council members for their support of bike lanes along 70th Street I was very
pleased to hear all of support for bike lanes from folks who live in the area.
In answer to Council woman Swanson regarding the authority to lower the speed limit it the street provides
bile lanes. The cite is: MS
160.263 Subd. 4 Speed on street with bicycle lane.
Dwaine Lindberg
i
RECEIVE)
FEB 191009
Hello,
I just became aware of this proposal and want to voice my opposition to this idea.
As a resident along the proposed path, 5209 Abercrombie Dr., this would ruin one the
main reasons we moved to Edina and purchased the home we did, the natural, undeveloped
area that sits right behind our home.
I do not want to increase the traffic that this area already has...
kids from the neighborhood and people from the neighborhood walking dogs or just enjoying
the little bit of "nature" that this part of Edina has, and has kept this way for over 40
years.
I don't know who's idea it was to develop this as planned, but it wasn't someone who lives
here, that is very obvious.
We will be at the Monday meeting at city hall and will be very happy to debate this with
whomever wishes to.
Please DO NOT allow this to happen and let's find another way to spend our cities money
to enhance already developed areas to fulfill whatever goal this ideas was supposed to do.
Thank you,
Cory, Susie, Vivian and Sullivan Shubert
5209 Abercrombie Dr.
Edina, MN. 55439
952 -915 -1952
To: ' Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: Correspondence
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item VII.
Consent ❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
11 1 U Discussion 11
Info /Background:
Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out.
4680 15"' Street NE
Willmar, MN 56201
February 17, 2009
Michael Siitari, Edina Chief of Police
4801 W 50' Street
Edina, MN 55424
RECEIVED
MAR 0 31009
Dear Sir:
After a great deal of thought and prayer it is with a heavy heart that
I write to you.
On Wednesday January 28 my husband, his brother and I traveled
to Edina for a birthday party. We do not spend a lot of time in The
Cities thus were not familiar to with the area.
Following MapQuest directions, we exited 494 on Highway
100/Normandale Road exit going north. We came to an
intersection where we stopped for the red light. As we crossed the
intersection going north toward Normandale Road, saw a police
car about a half block away at the side of the street. The officer
was standing at a car which he apparently had pulled over. As we
proceeded north, the officer (Number 24 I think) stepped into the
middle of the road and flagged us down. We immediately pulled
over. Having no idea what was going on, we waited until he
completed his business with the other car /driver. Then he came to
us where he informed us that we were speeding. He said we were
going 45 in a 35 mile zone. We told him we were unfamiliar with
the area. He returned to his car for a very long time and finally
returned with a ticket. Officer 24 was polite, and explained that the
neighbors had complained about people speeding on their street
which is why he was stopping everyone.
We were totally dumbfounded because none of us thought we were
driving faster than the speed limit. Consequently we did not ask
any questions. Now I have many.
I am curious, what kind of equipment did the officer have in his car
that made it possible for him to know that we were speeding even
though he was not near his vehicle? Should he have provided
some verification or evidence that we indeed were speeding? Do
you think it is possible for a car to reach 45 miles per hour from a
dead stop in less than a half block without really tromping on the
accelerator? I'm usually a cautious, vocal passenger and I had not
felt a need to tell the driver to slow down. Typically would/should
an officer grant some consideration of this when writing a ticket?
The possibility of our driving on this street is negligible. What
was the lesson/message conveyed by giving us a ticket?
We paid the fine, but this should not be misconstrued to mean that
we felt we were guilty. We paid it because we didn't want the
hassle of returning to the Metro Area.
I know your responsibilities are great however, I would be ever so
grateful if you would take a few minutes respond to my questions.
Barbara Tornquist
�c. Gordon Hughes, City Manager
ames B. Hovland, Mayor
RECEIVED
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council, MAR 0 3 2009
Thank you for your support of the West 70th_ Street Study. It is obvious that there has been an enormous amount of time
d effort devoted to this subject and I want to thank you and everyone that has been involved.
I do not live on 70th but have am a stakeholder. I am writing to express my thoughts regarding the study. I am opposed
to a roundabout at the intersection of West 70th and Normandale Blvd. I think the cost and benefit are not well aligned
and it is almost impossible to enter /exit Normandale Blvd at this time. I understand that it is proposed in a later phase
of the project but wanted to express my thoughts at this time.
I would like to see a stop light, properly timed, at the end of the off ramp extending from the North Bound lane of Hwy
100 at West 70th Street. Traffic is metered on each of the other three corners or Hwy 100 and West 70th and there is
little reason not to balance the intersection.
I would also like to see an inexpensive center island at the confluence of Normandale Blvd and the entrance to Christ
Presbyterian Church (on West 7(yh). The idea is to re -route traffic up Normandale Road to the parking entrance for the
church. The center lane on 70th would prevent a left turn into the church from traffic headed east on 70th street and
further reduce a very busy and difficult to navigate entrance and egress to /from Normandale Blvd and 70th Street .
Traffic should be allowed to exit from the church onto 70h heading West. This would ensure that traffic flows in a
circular path (and it would not be routed through neighborhoods). This is long overdue and should be put in place
respective of the outcome of the study— it is not a Sunday matter but an issue day in and day out.
I recommend a compromise on the bike path. There are sidewalks on either side of the road at present. I would
recommend that you designate one sidewalk as a bike path (with bi- directional traffic) and one for walking as they have
done around the Minneapolis Lakes. There is not a parent I know that wants their kid to walk or ride on 70th street. My
•iew is that a road grade bike path will be almost exclusively for adult use as the traffic is simply to challenging and
,hting is not very adequate.
On this subject, I noted that the 25 mph designation can be achieved with a designated bike path. It was not clear if it
needed to be on the road bed? If not, I am optimistic that we can reduce speed and still accomplish the City's plan to
reduce emissions, etc.
Using the sidewalks would also allow homeowners on 70h to continue street parking (where space is available). In
actuality, the space on the street is very narrow and in many cases, center turn lanes, limit on street parking (the lanes
on either side of the turning lanes become the road bed for continuing traffic). I rarely see cars parked on the street.
Most visitors park on the side streets or in the driveway of the person they are visiting. Without considerable surgery, I
am not convinced that the existing road bed dimensions would support a continuous bike path either.
A roundabout is not needed at Valley View — at all. This has never been and is not expected to be a traffic pattern
problem. Generally traffic enters 70th from France or at Highway 100.
I would recommend some type of meter at West Shore in phase 1. Traffic moving both west bound and east bound are
virtually unfettered from Cornelia drive to Hwy 100 (where most speeding occurs). Perhaps this is a speed indicator but
I would suggest as a minimum a static 4 way stop sign. It is low cost and when combined with the cross walk designation
would clearly create a speed break.
Again, thank you for your consideration of the residents along West 70th street.
sincerely,
Brian and Lori Hedberg
4913 Trillium Lane
Edina, MN 55435
RECEIVED
MAR u 31009
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:59 AM
To: Gordon Hughes
Cc: Susan Heiberg
Subject: FW: City Council Members, Mayor & Gordon Hughes
Page 1 of 1
From: LSLEDDER @aol.com [mailto:LSLEDDER @aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:39 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: City Council Members, Mayor & Gordon Hughes
Honorably Mayor, Council members & Mr. Hughes,
I have to express my disappointment with a scheduled event on Monday, March 9th at the
City Hall. For a year Edina Unplugged has been on the calendar for this night. It is a huge
frustration to. have worked for many years to get just one night set aside for families and then
have an event "scheduled" for this night. I would suggest any feedback from the night also be
suspect as most families will not attend and therefore not give proper review. I would
suggest a reschedule of the event to another more suitable night.
Sincerely,
Bert Ledder, School Board Clerk
Edina Public Schools
L S Ledder@AOL.COM
Home: (952) 941 9083
School: (952) 848 3912 x 7316
Confidentiality Notice
If the information in this electronic communication relates to an individual pupil, it is a confidential pupil record
under Minnesota Law and may not be reviewed, distributed, or copied by any person other than the individual
(s) to whom it is addressed. This electronic communication is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any further review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this electronic communication or any attachment thereto is strictly prohibited. If you have received an
electronic communication in error, you should immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your
system.
Worried about job security? Check out the 5 safest jobs in a recession.
3/3/2009
Page 1 of 1
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:22 AM RECEIVED
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: Susan Heiberg MAR 0 3 2009
Subject: FW: 70th Street Comments for open hearing period
From: caemmerer @gmail.com [mailto:ckaemmerer @ gmail.com] On Behalf Of Carol Kaemmerer
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 9:33 PM
To: Lynette Biunno,
Subject: 70th Street Comments for open hearing period
Dear Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council,
Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the proposed plans for the reduction of traffic and speeds on
70th Street between Highway 100 and France Avenue. As residents of Trillium Lane, we often find it difficult
to exit from the Normandale Lane/Frontage Road onto 70th Street because of the traffic exiting Highway 100
northbound using the continuous right turn lane. We therefore favor the elimination of the continuous exit lane
from the exit ramp. We do not, however, favor a roundabout there, because it would be a significant capital
expense -- and because we do not see that it would enhance the ability to exit the neighborhood, nor slow
traffic on 70th Street beyond the interchange.
The re- instatement of a school zone near Cornelia School and the installation of a light at West Shore seem to
be appropriate improvements, which we support. However, while lovely roadways are nice amenities, we are
not in favor of the use of taxes or a special assessment to support enhanced pavement surfaces, landscaping,
and other changes that are not directly related to safety.
Sincerely,
Bill and Carol Kaemmerer
4900 Trillium Lane
Edina, MN 55435
Carol Kaemmerer
952.927.9541
3/3/2009
Page 1 of 1
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:20 AM RECEIVED
To: Wayne Houle MAR 0 31009
Cc: Susan Heiberg
Subject: FW: W. 70 th Traffic Study
From: r. Laider [mailto:iaced99 @yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:01 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: W. 70 th Traffic Study
March 2, 2009
To: Mayor Hovland
City Council Members
Edina Transportation Commission
City Engineer
I would like you to consider the following when making your decision on the W. 70 th Street Traffic
Study.
I live on Trillium Lane, three blocks south of W. 70th. I drive W. 70th numerous times each day. I
agree that there needs to be traffic calming. There is too much traffic and too many cars traveling
faster than the posted speed limit.
I agree with removing the "free access" from north bound Hwy 100. This would make it much safer
for cars trying to access W. 70th from Normandale Road (the south frontage road we use).
I prefer to see additional traffic signals on W. 70th, along with the bike lanes. Both of these would
slow down cars.
I am opposed to any "roundabouts ". I avoid driving on W. 70th between France and York because
of the roundabouts. People do not understand "YIELD ". I have seen numerous "near misses ".
Drivers do not know how to use the roundabouts properly. Roundabouts are very expensive
compared to other traffic controls.
Thank you.
Ralph Laiderman
4903 Trillium Lane
Edina, MN 55435
3/3/2009
Page 1 of I
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:19 AM RECEIVED
To: Wayne Houle
Cc: Susan Heiberg; Sharon Allison MAR 0 3 2009
Subject: FW: W.70th traffic study
From: Su Su [mailto :susanralphtrill @ yahoo.com]
r Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 7:32 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: W.70th traffic study
�l
Please send copies to: Mayor Hovland
Edina Transportation Commission
City Council
Engineering Dept.( Jack, Sharon)
Regarding the W. 70th street Traffic Study:
I live on Trillium Lane. It is 3 blocks south of W. 70th st.
Does the City of Edina have unlimited money?
I am opposed to assessments or increased property taxes to pay for changes to W. 70th st.
I am opposed to any roundabouts near the Hwy. 100 and W.. 70th st. area.
The major route to and from Trillium Lane is the south frontage road (Normandale Rd.) A roundabout at or
near the intersection of W. 70th st. and Nonnandale Rd. (south frontage road) would impede our ability to
access W. 70th st.
The city should use the least expensive traffic calming measures, like traffic signals and lower speed limits.
I am opposed to additional landscaping, lighting,and decorative concrete on W. 70th st. Both sides of W. 70th st.
already have lawns, trees and flowers from residential and commercial plantings. Residents certainly can self -
fund whatever additional improvements they want.
If the City has so much extra money, please use it for the school system, police and fire
departments and raises for the hard - working City employees.
(Thanks to all of you for your dedication and work.)
Sincerely,
Susan Laiderman
4903 Trillium Lane
Edina, MN 55435
susanralphtrill@yahoo.com
3/3/2009
Page 1 of 1
Susan Heiberg
RECEIVED
MAR 0 12009
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:57 AM
Cc: Susan Heiberg
Subject: FW: PUBLIC COMMENT FOR FEBURARY 17, 2009 PUBLIC HEARING
From: HBABB952 @aol.com [mailto:HBABB952 @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 2:06 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT FOR FEBURARY 17, 2009 PUBLIC HEARING
DEAR MAYOR HOVLAND AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I MUST TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE LAST DAYS OF PUBLIC COMMENT TO THANK EACH OF
YOU BOTH COLLECTIVELY AND INDIVIDUALLY FOR YOUR KIND AND PROMPT ACNOWLEGEMENTS
TO ALL OF MY MANY E -MAILS AND TELEPHONE CALLS. I WILL BE UNABLE TO PERSONALLY DO SO
AT FUTURE MEETINGS SO 1 WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT ALL YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATIONS
ARE DEEPLY APPRECIATED.
THE ECONOMIC CRISIS HAS ADDED ANOTHER DIMENSION TO YOUR
CONSIDERATION PROCESS AND THIS MEANS MORE HOME WORK. I DO
APPRECIATE THE TIME YOU SPEND ,OFF CAMERA, TENDING TO THE
RESIDENT'S NEEDS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COURTESIES AND SERVICE.
RESPECTFULLY,
HAROLD BABB
952 - 926 -9521
You're invited to Hollywood's biggest party: Get Oscars updates red carpet pics and more at Moviefone.
3/2/2009
Page 1 of 1
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette Biunno
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:47 AM
To: Steve Kirchman; Cary Teague; Gordon Hughes RECEIVED
Cc: Susan Heiberg
Subject: FW: JMS Property/Solution MAR U ZQ(�
From: Sue Aura [mailto:sueaura @ hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 3:03 PM
To: Lynette Biunno; sueaura @hotmail.com; Sue Aura
Subject: JMS Property/Solution
My belief is that the only honorable solution to this illegal building is that it be torn down or
modified to adhere to the existing rules for set - backs. It is imperative that the city council deny
JMS permits for inhabitance or additional building until the existing property is altered to
compliance. Anyone with half a brain could anticipate that this would happen after the run around
with the company last spring and summer. The fact that the zoning board and city inspectors
turned a blind eye to this property just reeks of corruption. Same as the Calvan Christian School
"accident ". We get the message loud and clear: rules don't apply to certain developers. The
property is ruined. Ruined. I'm appalled that everything the neighbors and citizens fought against
came to fruition. They lost the trees, the nesting area, the view, etc., etc.... and for what? An
ugly, illegal monstrosity. To top it off, the City Council has the audacity to consider permission to
open the property for Parade of Homes! What a sickening joke. How you all can sleep at night is
beyond me.
Sue Aura
5900 Oaklawn Avenue
Windows Live TM Contacts: Organize your contact list. Check it out.
3/2/2009
boa %tools
DEFINING EXCELLENCE
February 24, 2009
Chief Marty Scheerer
Edina Fire Department
6250 Tracy Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
RECEIVED
FEB. 2 7 2009
Dear Chief Scheerer and Department Members,
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
(952) 848 -3900
www.edina.m.mmus
On behalf of.fhe entire school district, I would like to thank you for your
prompt and thorough response to the fire at South View Middle School on
February 17. Your help with the entire incident was most appreciated.
You are an amazing team!
You are to be commended for your professionalism and partnership in
providing safety for our community. Our school district benefited from all
of the safety training you have provided our students and staff and the first
class manner in which you managed the incident from start to finish.
Again, thank you!
ncerely,
ressen, Superintendent
WE CARE V WE DARE V WE SHARE
Proposed
Nine Mile Creek
Regional Trail
CORRESPONDENCE
Page 1 of 1
Susan Heiberg
From: -
Lynette Biunno
Sent:
Friday, February 27, 2009 8:52 AM
To:
John Keprios
Cc:
Susan Heiberg
RECEIVED
FEB 2 7 2009
Subject: FW: Attn: Mayor James Hovland - re: new bike path construction
From: Kevin Donlin [mailto:kmd @mindspring.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 8:44 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Attn: Mayor James Hovland - re: new bike path construction
Dear Mayor Hovland,
I would like to register my concern about construction of a bike path in Edina that will affect Nine Mile Creek near
70th Street and Hwy 100.
I am strongly opposed to any bike path traveling along the residential properties along Nine Mile Creek for the
budgetary and environmental reasons, which I will share when my neighbors and I attend the Open House on
March 9.
But I am most opposed to this new bike trail for reasons of safety.
There have been numerous muggings along the similar Greenway path in Minneapolis, and a bike trail in our
backyards would open access to people from far and wide, 24/7. There are no fences here to separate our young
children from strangers entering the proposed bike'trail.
Please reply at your earliest convenience to let me know your position on this.
It is my understanding that State Senator Geoff Michel and City Council Member Scot Housh share the views of
most in our area, and oppose bike -trail construction along our backyards facing Nine Mile Creek.
Sincerely,
Kevin Donlin
5185 Abercrombie Dr.
952 - 996 -9053
2/27/2009
Page 1 of 1
Susan Heiberg
From: Lynette'Biunno
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:00 AM
To: John Keprios
Cc: Susan Heiberg
RECEIVE:
FEB 2 7 2069
Subject: FW: Attn: Mayor James Hovland - CLARIFICATION re: new bike path construction
From: Kevin Donlin [mailto:kmd @mindspring.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:07 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Attn: Mayor James Hovland - CLARIFICATION re: new bike path construction
Dear Mayor Hovland,
In my last email, I mistakenly mentioned that City Council Member Scot Housh shared the views of most in our
area, and opposed bike -trail construction along our backyards facing Nine Mile Creek.
This was a misunderstanding on my part — Scot Housh has not made a decision on this matter and it was my
error to ascribe an opinion to him.
Sincerely,
Kevin Donlin
5185 Abercrombie Dr.
952 - 996 -9053
2/27/2009
Feb. 23, 2009
Mayor Hovland and Council Members,
RECEIVED
FEB 2 71009
The new Comprehensive Plan is built on the cornerstones that established our city, its land and
zoning use, along with the matching of road design to land use. These cornerstones form our
residential neighborhoods and protect them from the intrusion of commercial use. The two lane
street lined with homes was built with on- street parking on both sides in front of homes. That is
what our street looked like during the 1960's parade of homes that brought people here to live.
Many of the homes face towards 70th Street and form the heart of the Cornelia Neighborhood.
The 1980's brought change to the road with the construction of the interchange at Hwy 100 and
the closure of 66 access to the highway. What followed in the 1980's study was a call for a safer
road with less traffic; solve the impossible with out closing the road. SRF succeeded in a safer
road that has kept the traffic volumes level for over 20 years. The three left turn lane intersections
reduced the dangerous rear end collision and retained some on- street parking on both sides that
continues to calm traffic and provide transit bikers an 8' wide on -road area to ride if they wish to
compete with our 13,000 cars per day. In this decade the road saw the completion of the missing
link of state aid sidewalks on both north and south sides for safe passage for pedestrian and
recreational bikers from Hwy 100 to France Ave. We also had the Arneson Park left turn lane
added which in turn removed more on- street parking.
The perfect storm occured when the New Comprehensive plan, the new BETF, the Energy
committee and the Parks all converged on our 50 year old residential road that is in need of a
new road bed and utility replacement. Now everyone is interested in the use of land in front of our
homes that provides access to so many amenities. We have 13,000 cars but do we want to add
more multi users to the mix? Only 112 (0.5 %) of the 22,547 Edina residents who were asked on
the census how they arrived at work stated that they "BIKED" to work. Three Rivers estimates
that 500,000 walkers and bikers will use the Nine Mile Creek Regional trail through Edina and
Richfield. There is no estimate of how many would utilize the trail that could be built just 40 feet
from the front of my home.
The SAC and SRF did not have data on Feb. 17th, 2009 to explain why they did not propose 10'
traffic lanes because lanes are not built that narrow for safety reasons. MNDOT requires 12'
opposing traffic lanes; 11' lanes would require a variance. MNDOT may or may not be receptive
to grant and pay for 11' lanes. The 10' opposing traffic lane is not built or approved in MN for
safety reasons. The 10' lane is reserved for construction lanes or when both lanes are proceeding
in the same direction. Will MNDOT be receptive to 10' opposing traffic lanes to accommodate the
three lanes at intersection with left turn lanes plus 2 (6) on -road bike lanes? It would fit in the 40'
roadbed but is it safe? The 11' lane geometrics would require the "bubbling" (widening) of our
street to 43'or 44' in front of approximately 24 homes to fit all the users on the road. The loss of
green spaces and well established trees would remove our canopy that buffers our homes. We
would look similar to the sunny area of France Ave. north of HWY 62.
A BETF representative spoke at the council meeting believing that 70th Street residents had
requested "NO PARKING" signs in front of their home. She is mistaken. The 16 "NO PARKING"
signs on the road delineate that it is a left turn area where parking is restricted due to geometrics.
The SAC heard from our city police that other areas of the city have greater concern with traffic
then 70th Street. There is not a simple solution to this complex problem but the need for a "safer"
solution is paramount. The posting of a 25 M.P.H. speed sign will not change the driving patterns
of the drivers. Please do not install on -road bike lanes as a traffic calming method to supposedly
lower speed on the corridor. Would the reduction from the current 38 M.P.H. average speed,
down to 33 M.P.H. encourage anyone to safely bike on 70th Street? The BETF plans for primary
and secondary routes would overlay our existing roadway. The Complete Street Model explained
in the BETF Report protects on- street parking. The BETF places the bike user "on- road" at the
exclusion of on- street parking. The BETF "s primary and secondary bike route wish list needs to
meet the reality of how much is enough, and modify the excessive designations. Bikers'
preference to avoid the roads with hills but require duplicate access to "on -road lanes" in addition
to "off -road trails" on the same road is not a justifiable allocation of the limited land or funding that
is available. It is without question that the continued loss of on- street parking causes safety
issues for homeowners to access and enjoy their homes. Larger front yard turnarounds and off -
street parking increases on driveways and parking pads do not reflect positively on home values.
The question is not do we want bike lanes and bike trails? The answer is 57% do want something
available. The question is how many miles do we need, what type and where. Should the routes
remove parking and go through our front yards as if the park moved into our homes? If they need
more park land please purchase the location like we did. Then they can build the trails and pay
for it as we do as property owners to be assessed for this project along with MNDOT.
The SAC proposed a geometric design that is buildable now without hoping for variances that
may or may not be approved. The safe 12' lanes, existing left turn lanes and 8' wide on- street
parking, are all ready to go and in compliance with MNDOT. The plan also hopes to prevent cut
through traffic onto other side streets. Their recommendation reflected the community's
commitment to consider all of Edina while preserving beauty, function and livability in our
residential Cornelia Neighborhood.
The Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County have made commitments for plans that will
serve our city and our connectivity to .our neighboring communities. We need this broader
perspective that considers the rights of both bikers and homeowners in planning a well designed,
safe, comprehensive bike plan for the city.
Thank you for your considerations,
Jan Ferrell
4704 west 701h Street
RECEIVE[
February 23, 2009 FEB. 2 6 Z
Mayor James Hovland
Edina City Hall
4801 W.50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Hovland:
We have lived at 6800 Brook Drive for 40 years. It has
wetlands where wildlife such as herons, fox, owls, deer
and mink live. It is secluded and quiet. To us it would be
a nightmare to see this destroyed by an asphalt bike
path running along the creek or on a long boardwalk
over the creek (a solution described at the meeting as a
way to avoid destroying the wetlands.)
We see the following issues:
The ]environment: The Three Rivers Park District
states that it has the mission of environmental
stewardship, but a bike path through numerous back
yards that goes through wetlands and increases the
traffic in those areas will have the effect of destroying
the environment and natural habitat. We believe that
increased traffic will drive away the wildlife that
currently lives there. While the highest area of interest
expressed by the people of Edina in a Three Rivers
Survey was for a bike path, we believe the second most
important issue noted on their survey was concern for
the .environment.
Traffic and Safety: Mostly Edina citizens use our
street, but the stated purpose of the bike path is
"from Hopkins through Edina and Richfield perhaps
with trails splitting off there to link with trails in
Minneapolis and Bloomington."
(http://www.startribune.com/local/west/38757467.html?elr=KArks
UUUU). We personally would not feel safe night or day
with the possibility of anyone wandering through our
back yard. What we would be going from is a secluded
but relatively inaccessible area to a secluded and highly
accessible area by anyone in the twin cities area.
Changing the rules: Edina is a developed suburb.
While Minneapolis has Lake Harriet with a walk around
path this decision was made when development
occurred. When Edina was developed and our lots were
platted, I am told our developer specifically extended
our lots to the center of the creek to prevent a horse or
bike path going through the back yards. This was a
covenant between the city and the homeowners, and I
do not believe the city should now consider reneging on
the agreement. (Note: while only some of us own to the
center of the creek, all the lots on the creek generally
extend to where the wetlands begin, with no additional
development. or paths envisioned)
The Process: We do not understand the process for the
selection of and approval of an Edina bike path. At the
information session on February 11th which was held at
the Edina City hall we received conflicting
information. John Keprios, the Edina Park and
Recreation Director, indicated that the Edina City
Council had the final say on whether a bike path would
be approved and if so, what the route would be. Also,
that the city council would hold a meeting / information
session for Edina residents before deciding anything.
Representatives of Three Rivers Park District who ran
implied that it
the information session on February 1 selectthe route
was their decision and that they woul�c� would pretty
of the path and that the Edina City ur impression was
much rubber stamp the decision. our u their minds and
that Three Rivers had already made back ands on
that the route would run through
Nine Mile Creek. We would like s to be an issue for the
Edina City Council to decide bas ed on a hearing with
Edina residents.
Cost and Maintenance: We feel that the money could be
used for other projects that are already in place, i.e.,
Edina parks, walking paths, Braemar park or other
neighborhood parks. The cost to initially do the
proposed project would be very high, but th e
maintenance, clean up and patrolling costs would
expensive and ongoing for many years. If the money
were not available in the future, the path would
deteriorate and be a liability for the community•
In summary, we strongly oppose routing a bike path
along Nine Mile Creek and through our and environment
d u
neighbor's back yards. It jeopardizes the
and our safety.
We are not willing to grant an easement through our
property for the proposed bike path.
;SiinZerel -
Kurt 7d M King
Michael G. Wolff
5300 West 701h Street
Edina, MN 55439
February 23, 2009
District Board of Managers Nine Mile Creek Water Shed District
(Kevin Bigalke, LuAnn Tolliver, Connie Lynch, Steve Kloiber,
Bob Kojetin, Geoffrey Nash)
7710 Computer Avenue, Suite 135
Edina, MN 55435
Three Rivers Park Board of Commissioners
(Larry Blacksted, Marilyn Corcoran, Mark Haggerty,
Sara Wyatt, Dale Woodbeck, Rosemary Franzese,
Joan Peters)
3000 Xenium Lane North
Plymouth, MN 5541 -1299
Edina City Council
(Mayor James Hovland, Council Members
Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scott Housh,
Ann Swenson)
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 501h Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
Dear Sirs/Madams:
It is with alarm and disgust that I write this letter regarding the proposed bike trail along
Nine Mile Creek in Edina. While I can appreciate that people, including the residents of
Edina, would like to be able to ride their bikes along the creek, not only is the proposal
unjustified, it is an injustice to many property owners.
Much of the area surrounding the creek provides a unique habitat for wildlife that
certainly would be destroyed by many of the proposed routes along the creek (apparently,
this has not even been considered as no environmental impact studies have been offered
by any of the entities involved with this project to date). Edina is an old suburb and these
somewhat undisturbed tracks of land are precious to anyone who appreciates nature and
the environment. To lose these places would be a travesty.
Page 2
February 23, 2009
In addition to the habitat, the proposed bike path would irreparably harm the people's
right to the quiet enjoyment of their property — a right Americans hold sacred. As
resident on 70`h street, the use of the front yard as a place for kids to play or as place for
people to gather is not feasible. Despite the speed limit, the road is used as a highway
much of the day. It is dangerous and noisy.
Our backyards are our only hope for privacy and peaceful enjoyment. Running a bike
trail behind houses on this street and those across the creek would ruin any privacy we
now are afforded. What is now an open, friendly community will become nothing but
lot- after -lot of privacy fences (and who will pay for that ?). Property owners should not
be expected to endure such public nuisance and give up their right to the quiet enjoyment
of their property.
As alarming are the potential problems associated with easy public access to somewhat
remote areas. The potential for crime is incredible, not only to civilians in the area, but to
home owners as well since most of these homes are walk -outs. There is no way the
police will be able to patrol these areas adequately, leaving the home owners to deal with
the problems (one home owner I talked with told me he was going to buy a gun for
protection if the trail goes through —just what we need). As it is now, we exp erience
problems on a fairly regular basis in our little neighborhood park and flood area. There is
garbage around (we picked -up 33 trash bags fall this spring), kids drinking and taking
drugs and even signs of gang activity (look under the railroad bridge). I am constantly
picking up trash on my property and junk people throw in the creek. We certainly don't
need to attract more people.
We have all paid a premium to live where we do and are taxed accordingly. The
proposed bike trail would most certainly decrease housing values in a time were many
people are paying -off loans that are higher than the current value of their homes. It is
hard pill to swallow knowing you are paying taxes to make your property worth less and
less enjoyable.
Finally, with all our other needs and lack of financial resources, it is perplexing that we
choose to spend money this way.
Even the Mayor and City Council members are aware that the proposed bike path is
unjustifiable and an injustice to home owners. They validated this statement through
their own actions during the City Council meeting held January 6`h, where it was clearly
Page 3
February 23, 2009
evident that the goal was to get the proposed bike path through under the subterfuge of
water quality. They even talked about the particular language they will need to use to get
it past the Water Shed District Board as a water quality project.
The Mayor and city council members failed in their responsibility to those citizens
impacted most by sending the petition to the Water Shed District without adequate public
notice. As a citizen of Edina, I ask the Mayor and the Council Members to reconsider
their actions and I ask those in charge of the related entities involved to recognize e
th
situation and to rectify the failure of our Edina city officials to handle this matter
appropriately. Please keep the bike trail out of our backyards.
Respectfully,
Michael G W
cc: U. S. Senator Geoff Michel
U. S. Senator Keith Downey
John Keprios, Edina Park and Recreation
Wayne Houle, Edina Public works
Anthony J. Pellegrin
Amanda K. Williams
6512 Creek Drive
Edina, MN 55439
952 - 941 -1960
February 22, 2009
Edina City Council Members: Mayor James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle,
Scot Housh, Ann Swenson
Edina City Engineer & Public Works Director: Wayne Houle
Edina Park & Recreation Department: John Keprios
Three Rivers Park District: Kelly Grissman,
Senior Manager of Planning with Three Rivers Park District: Jonathan Vlaming,
Dear Sirs and Madams:
We moved to Edina nearly nine years ago and chose to purchase our
home in large part because of the wonderful stretch of Nine Mile Creek that runs
behind our home. It is a natural habitat for a number of birds and animals and we
enjoy the quiet privacy provided by living along the creek. We were both
surprised and taken aback to read in the Star Tribune about the plans to put a
bike path along Nine Mile Creek. Our concerns motivated us to attend the open
house at the Edina City Hall on Wednesday, February 11 to learn more about the
proposed route and design of the bike path.
One of the other things that attracted us to Edina was a sense that
residents actively participated in community decisions based on open sharing of
information. Unfortunately, in addition to the realization that the creek bike path
plans had been quietly shepherded to their current state without meaningful
visibility, nearly all of the information we learned at the February 11 open house
served to raise serious concerns regarding the proposed bike path along Nine
Mile Creek. These concerns include:
1. Environmental Concerns: Edina has few truly natural areas remaining —
particularly wetlands. In the area along Nine Mile Creek behind Creek Drive, we
have personally observed deer, owls, egrets, foxes, wild turkeys, returning
families of mallard and wood ducks and many other species of birds as well as
turtles, fish and frogs. The creek watershed provides a valuable corridor for
wildlife to move along and is particularly narrow in the area behind Valley Lane
and Creek Drive. It is difficult to imagine that the habitat and its animals can co-
exist much less thrive with a paved thoroughfare for walking and biking along the
creek. Pollution of the creek is also a significant issue. Road salt, fertilizers, and
trash continue to be issues we struggle with while trying to . keep the creek
healthy. The building of a sixteen foot path (10 feet for a paved path & 3 feet on
each side for "shoulder') will do nothing to alleviate and will most likely add to the
Pollution burden on Nine Mile Creek. A project of this significance should have a
thorough environmental study. We fully expect that no work will proceed on this
Proposed proiect absent acceptable publicly available results of a detailed
environmental im act stud for the ro'ect. Anything less would fly in the face of
responsible stewardshi for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed.
2. Nine Mile Creek Watershed /Flooding: Nine Mile Creek in the area of
Valley Lane and Creek Drive often overflows the banks and floods into the yards
of the neighboring homes. After a day of heavy rainfall or snow run -off, we have
often observed the creek bed rising several feet to a width of more than 40 feet. If
this bike path is to have year -round access, we assume the path would have to
be built up above the yearly flood level. It is hard to see how a path could be built
up to four feet above the .existing grade, allow for proper drainage and still be
environmentally friendly. Ms. Grissman of Three Rivers Park District indicated
that the bike path might be built on stilts in a boardwalk style, elevating it off the
ground. Not only does that sound costly and environmentally invasive, it would
also be an aesthetic eyesore. In addition to the predictable environmental
degradation such a ro'ect would cause buildin the ath alon the creek
inevitably leads #o im jpractical and expensive recurring repair and maintenance
extensive periods of path closures each year, significant and rapid deterioration
of path conditions and /or significantly costly and aesthetically repugnant
structural alternatives.:.
3. Safety and Security: Many areas of Nine Mile Creek running through
Edina are secluded and relatively remote. If a path is built along. the creek
allows for biking or walking during any hour of the day or night, we question the
safety for. our home and our children at play given our proximity to the creek. We
also question whether the bike path can be adequately supervised by the police
since at many points the creek is far from any streets they currently patrol.. We
also question the proximity of the proposed trail to our schools - the proposed
path will connect to the Three Rivers Park District's regional trail network, which
currently has more than 90 miles of trail. This will bring a large number of people
each day into close proximity to Creek Valley Elementary, Valley View Middle
School and Edina High School, creating a safety concern for many of us who
have children attending those schools. Building such a thoroughfare along the
creek would significantly increase the burden on Edina's police force and impose
significant safety burdens on those families and schools near the trail
4. Financial Concerns: The proposed route along the creek is clearly the
most costiv alternative we have seen in terms of initial capital expenditure AND
ongoing costs of policing maintenance and repairs Today's current financial
climate hardly seems the appropriate time to be spending precious financial
resources on such an undertaking. The construction and ongoing maintenance
of a bike trail does not fall into the "need -to- have" category as we face difficult
financial and budgetary choices. Street -based routings would be more cost
effective to build and to maintain in the long -run. On a related issue, we would
also expect that the higher property tax rates paid year over year by residents
with homes along the creek would be decreased immediately and substantially to
reflect the degradation in property values brought about by the path running
along the back yards. (These higher taxes are in addition to the acquisition price
premium historically paid for homes along the creek.) Thus, in addition to an
increased financial burden the City of Edina should expect decreased property
tax revenues if the creekside bike path project is pursued. While there is never a
-good time to do so the current economic environment clearly is not a time to
Pursue an alternative that imposes the hiahest possible near term and long-term
cost on taxpayers and increased pressure on the City's budget
5. Apparent Lack of Oversight and Responsibility: From what we have
been able to ascertain, the proposed project is being run by a loose
confederation of organizations, such that when we press for more information on
the proposal and any details, every party seems to point toward another and no
single organization or group seems to be in charge or have a comprehensive set
of information. From what we can tell, each of the groups involved has input on
what may happen but none holds the ultimate responsibility for the project.
Beyond the frustration this brings in simply trying to receive a comprehensive set
of facts regarding the proposed project it also does not bode well for the future of
the project in terms of execution — whether in design environmental impacts
construction monitorina or onooing maintenance and re air.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of our concerns. We look
forward to learning of your thoughts and solutions to the issues we have raised.
Sincerely,
Anthony J. Pelle rin and Amanda K. Williams
cc: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Managers: LuAnn Tolliver, Corrine
Lynch, Steve Kloiber, Bob Kotejin, Geoffrey Nash
Nine Mile Creek Watershed Administrator: Kevin Bigalke
Senator Geoffrey Michel, R -Edina
State Representative, Keith Downey, R -Edina
H. Jed Hepworth & Lee H. Schubert
5509 Valley Lane
Edina, MN 55439
February 11, 2009
Ms. Kelly Grissman Mr. John Keprios
Planner, Three Rivers Park District. Park & Recreation Director, City of Edina
RE: NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL ROUTING
Dear Ms Grissman & Mr. Keprios:
We are long -time Edina residents and parties potentially directly- affected by the routing
of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail as presented in the recent Star Tribune article.
We want to express our concerns about the routing, and not only in respect of its impact
on our home and our neighborhood:
1. WILDLIFE & HABITAT — Much of the Nine Mile Creek watershed is a narrow
ribbon of wild -life habitat and relative wilderness that is home to wood - ducks, egrets,
deer, owls, wild turkeys, etc. A 10 foot wide paved path through the middle of that
narrow ribbon and the resulting traffic will eliminate the wildlife that so enrich our
community.
2. FLOODING - Much of Nine Mile Creek floods at least 2 or 3 times per year. If
the path isn't raised at least 3 feet in our area, it will flood. Even if it is raised (an
eyesore and further degradation of the habitat), all the banks and berms will have to be
maintained.
3. BUDGET PRIORITIES - the State and Edina confront years of budget
shortfalls. How can anyone justify the investment in and maintenance of a special and
high cost route for the trail through the watershed? There are numerous street -based
routings available that will take advantage of existing resources.
4. MISPLACED FOCUS — in the 20 years we have lived in Edina, we have never
seen any investment in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed in our area. Now the Park
District and Edina are talking about cutting down mature trees and paving land which
will increase run -off and erosion?
5. SECURITY and SAFETY - we already have occasional problems along Nine
Mile Creek with kids setting off fireworks, smoking marijuana and littering. Opening
up the course of Nine Mile Creek through residential areas will only add to those
problems.
i
FABYANSKE
WESTRA
HART &
THOMSON
PRn4LAssoaA'no"
Edina City Council
Mayor James Hovland
Council Member Joni Bennett
Council Member Mary Brindle
Council Member Scott Housh
Council Member Ann Swenson
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
February 11, 2009
Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners
(Larry Blackstad, Marilynn Corcoran
Mark Haggerty, Sara Wyatt
Dale Woodbeck, Rosemary Franzese
Joan Peters)
3000 Xenium Lane North
Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299
Re: Proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail —Edina Segments
Dear Sirs/Madams:
Paul L. Ratelle
Direct: 612.359.7636
pmtelle @fwhtlaw.com
This letter is sent to inform you that as long time residents of the City of Edina, we strongly
object to any proposed regional bike trail that would run by Nine Mile Creek and behind our
home.
We reside at 5521 Valley Lane, Edina, Minnesota. We have resided at this address for 16 years
where we have been happily raising our four children. As long time residents of Edina (Paul has
lived here his entire life), we have come to expect from the city a fair hearing regarding the
issues that would greatly effect our property and the quality of life in the community for which
we have great affection and have made our permanent home.
As you may know, Valley Lane is used by many motorists as a thoroughfare between Tracy
Avenue and France Avenue. In addition, our home, as well as those of our neighbors on Valley
Lane, is situated in close proximity to the street. As such, the only respite from the interference
caused by this traffic to the quiet enjoyment of our property, as well as to others who reside
adjacent to Nine Mile Creek, is to conduct such activities as are normal for any resident of the
City of Edina in our backyards. A proposed regional bike trail through our backyard would
leave us with no reasonable means for the quiet enjoyment of our property. The activities we
800 LaSalleAvenue, Suite 1900, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Main: 612.359.7600 Fax: 612.359.7602 www.fwhtlaw.com
February 11, 2009
Page 2
have conducted in our backyards for many years without interference or disruption would come
to a complete end.
A regional bike trail running through our backyard would, essentially, force us to endure a public
throughway in close proximity to our home, not only across the front of our home but also across
the back, leaving us with no privacy. This situation is unacceptable and cannot be justified by
any general needs of the public. The consequences of the placement of this regional bike path
through our backyard and that of our neighbors would be a disruption to our privacy and the
right we have to the quiet enjoyment of our property. We should not be expected to accept or
endure this burden.
During our residency, our children and our neighbors' children -have played in and explored the
area surrounding Nine Mile Creek. This tremendous amenity which contributes to the quality of
life for all residents will be destroyed and substantially diminished by any bike trail, particularly
of the type proposed. Such a trail running along Nine Mile Creek through the backyards of the
residents of the City of Edina whose properties lie on Valley Lane and adjacent streets would be
detrimental not only to our properties but to this natural amenity.
We should also comment that we are unaware of any Environmental Impact Study ( "EIS ") that
has been conducted confirming that the wetlands, wildlife, plant life and natural habitat along
this portion of the Creek will not be harmed, destroyed or otherwise compromised by a bike path
being built along this portion of the Creek.
For anyone who has lived in this area long enough, it is well known that this natural habitat adds
greatly to the quality of life for those residing on Nine Mile Creek as well as the quality of life
for all residents of Edina. Those who own residences directly on Nine Mile Creek have
consistently paid higher real estate taxes compared to similar residences in the area that are not
located on the Creek. Moreover, there is little doubt that placing such a trail in proximity to the
backyards of the residents who live on Nine Mile Creek will have a significantly negative impact
on property values. This, too, during a time when in relation to other communities in Minnesota
the City of Edina is one of the few communities that, so far, has been able to maintain property
values and, therefore, a strong property tax base. All of that is jeopardized by the placement of
the proposed bike path.
There are other clear alternatives to placing a bike trail through the backyards of Edina residents.
Those other alternatives should be the only ones considered by the Edina City Council and the
Commissioners of the Three Rivers Park District to satisfy the objectives and goals of the
proposed plan, as well as to safeguard the natural habitat, and the right of privacy and personal
enjoyment of property and the property values of those residing on Nine Mile Creek.
February 11, 2009
Page 3
As long time residents of this community, we therefore strongly appeal to the Edina City Council
and the Commissioners of the Three Rivers Park District not to force upon us this unwanted and
unneeded bike trail along Nine We Creek, but to pursue the other more reasonable alternatives
to address the objectives of such a trail.
PLR/abm
V y Watele aul Constance B. Ratelle
5517 Valley Lane
Edina, MN 55439
DAVID & TAMI THOMPSON (952) 942 -3384
E -mail: thompson_davidj @yahoo.com
February 11, 2009
Edina City Council
Mayor James Hovland
Councilman Joni Bennett
Councilwoman Mary Brindle
Councilman Scott Housh
Councilwoman Ann Swenson
Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424
Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners
Larry Blackstad, Marilynn Corcoran, Mark Haggerty,
Sara Wyatt, Dale Woodbeck, Rosemary Franzese, Joan Peters
3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299
Dear Council Members and Commissioners:
We are writing to express our strong objection to the proposed routing of the regional bike trail
between Nine Mile Creek and adjacent landowners such as ourselves. Specifically these are
sections 9 and 11 on the map that was provided to us. We have many objections to this route,
but these are some of the more significant:
1) Safety and Security of the Neighborhood: Our children have been raised with the
understanding they could not play in the front yard unaccompanied by an adult due to
the busy thoroughfare street and busy public sidewalk (Valley Lane). For the past 45
years, the backyards in our neighborhood have provided a safe, secure area for
children..... separate and private from the busy car and pedestrian traffic in the front.
The safety and security that we have come to expect and appreciate would be forever
lost with the addition of a public regional trail through our back yards.
There have been several incidents at nearby Heights Park including reports of young
people with a gun, a man fleeing police in clothes taken from a nearby house, an
intoxicated man approaching children. Edina is a wonderful place with some lovely
parks. But it is not immune to the safety challenges that hidden park areas present.
Most parents would never allow young children to play in parks unattended. Must we
now have the same concerns about our own back yards?
2) Habitat and Wetland Destruction: Unlike Minnehaha Creek through Edina, most of Nine
Mile Creek has remained undeveloped in the midst of the asphalt and manicured lawns
of the city. Despite its narrow swath, most adjacent landowners have left the creek
banks wild in order to enjoy the beauty of the habitat and the wildlife it supports
including Wood Ducks, Deer, Egrets, Herons, Beaver, Muskrat, Fox, and Coyotes.
Paving a 10 foot public trail through the narrow flood plain would essentially eliminate
much of the last undeveloped wetland and wildlife habitat in Edina.
February 11, 2009, Page 2
3) Loss of Privacy and Loss of Property Values: Our street, Valley Lane, has become a
very busy thoroughfare between the High School and the Southdale Shopping district.
In addition, we have a public sidewalk in front of our homes that has become one of the
most popular walking and jogging routes in the city. The addition of a public regional
trail immediately behind our homes would turn the houses on Valley Lane into virtual
"Fish Bowls ...... homes without privacy. Our quality of life would be dramatically
compromised and our property values would be significantly impaired. We understand
why paths through natural areas are popular. Our family frequently bikes on metro
trails. But we would never expect to have a trail built that is so intrusive to homeowners.
Trails that are mere feet from backyard decks and swingsets are uncomfortable for both
the homeowner and the trail user.
4) Many Good Alternatives Exist: The maps produced by the task force indicate that there
are a number of route alternatives that do not negatively impact homeowners and
neighborhoods. Creating bicycle routes on city streets is less expensive, less invasive,
and has the advantage of slowing auto traffic. Valley Lane is a good candidate for bike
lanes. It has a separate sidewalk for pedestrians and it has few cross streets to
compromise rider safety. We urge the city to more closely examine such alternatives.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of our objections. We are confident that your
careful consideration will result in alternative routing of the bike trail that will be acceptable to
residents and trail users alike.
Sincerely,
7 D o R- �! 1{. -1- �
David Thompson
Tami Thompson
o
Harvey & Pam Johnson
SSOS Valley Lane
Edina, MN SS439
952- 941 -6076
February 11, 2009
Edina Park & Recreation Department, John Keprios
Three Rivers Park District, Kelly Grissman
We have lived in Edina for over 18 years and if implemented, stand to be directly affected by the proposed
Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. We would like to express our concern with the proposed bike path along 9
Mile Creek in Edina. The issues below apply to property along Nine Mile Creek generally, but we would like
to address specifically the section along Valley Lane, Hillside Lane, and Creek Drive as we have first hand
knowledge about this area. The following are the issues we would like to bring to your attention:
Wetlands, Animal Habitat and Environment — Edina does not have an overabundance of natural areas -
especially wetlands. In the area along the Creek behind Valley Lane the wetlands host Owls, Egrets, Fox,
Loons, returning families of Wood Ducks, Deer, and countless species of birds that continue to thrive in this
setting. It is difficult to imagine any of these habitats thriving by paving a thoroughfare for biking along the
Creek. Pollution feeding the creek including road salt, fertilizer, and trash continue to be issues we struggle
with while trying to keep the Creek healthy. In the paper this week there are concerns about road salt finding
its way into 9 Mile Creek already found to be well above safe levels for wildlife. It is difficult to envision a
solution providing the same protection of the Creek after a 10' wide path is added. Since the Nine Mike
Creek area is already rather narrow adding this path would mean that this amazing wildlife would no longer be
able travel freely up and down the Creek because of the increased usage. We would like to see the
,ivironmental impact study for this project
9 Mile Creek Watershed — this area of the Creek often overflows the banks and floods into the yards of
the neighboring homes. In our yard alone after a day of heavy rainfall the creek floods into our yard by more
than 30 feet If this path is to have 24 x 7 access, we assume the path would have to be built up above the
yearly flood level. It is hard to see how a path could be built up 3 'to 4 'above the existing grade and allow
for proper drainage and still be environmentally friendly.
Safety — Many areas of Nine Mile Creek are secluded and relatively remote. On Valley Lane - particularly in
the front of our homes, traffic is heavy and known to be an off freeway thoroughfare when traffic is heavy on
Highway 62. Many of us choose to send our children to the safety of the back yard for play. If a path is built
along the Creek that allows for biking, walking, during any hour of the day or night, we question the safety for
homes and children at play that remain close (within 100 feet specifically) to the Creek boundaries. We
understand that this path will be lit but we wonder about police supervision as it can be far from any street
they currently patrol. In some areas homes are fairly close to the creek, under 100', this could be a concern.
Budget and Priorities — It is extremely difficult to hear as constituents of Edina that we have unknowingly
funded money to The Three Rivers Park District for a project that if completed we will be responsible as
taxpayers to continue and sustain the upkeep of. Most importantly this is a project that clearly jeopardizes the
environment of one of the most beautiful wildlife areas we host in Edina, and stands to change directly both
the people and wildlife along its path. We look forward to hearing you comments and solutions to these
issues.
,,incerely,
Harvey & Pam Johnson
Harvey & Pam Johnson
5505 Valley Lane
Edina, MN 55439
952- 941 -6076
February 23, 2009
Edina Park & Recreation Department, John Keprios
Three Rivers Park District, Kelly Grissman
Senior Manager of Planning with Three Rivers Park District, Jonathan Vlaming
Edina City Council Members: Mayor James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann
Swenson
We have lived in Edina for over 18 years and if implemented, stand to be directly affected by the
proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. We would like to express our concern with the proposed bike
path along Nine Mile Creek in Edina. The issues below apply to property along Nine Mile Creek generally,
but we would like also to address specifically the section along Valley Lane, Hillside Lane, and Creek
Drive as we have first hand knowledge about this area. The following are the issues we would like to
bring to your attention:
Do the Residents of Edina really want this path? Edina has a population of approximately 47,425
yet we are very unclear how a survey of less than 10% of our population with a response of less than
2% of our city's population (865 responses) somehow represents a definitive desire that our
community wants this path. We also question what wording was included in this survey. "Would you like
to see more bike /walking trails in Edina" hardly notifies those asked that such a trail would run through .
their streets, backyards, schoolyards, and endanger the beauty of our Creek and Wetlands. Council
Members and The Watershed District have veiled the presentation of the path to the public under a
council agenda of "water quality projects ". How any constituent reading the council agenda would know
this to be actual plans for a bike trail is unknown to,u% and a clear breach of public trust and also.of the.
offices held by each of you
Wetlands, Animal Habitat and'. Environment- Edina does not have an overabundance of natural .areas
— especially wetlands. In the area along the Creek behind Valley Lane the wetlands host Owls, Egrets,
Fox, Loons, returning families of Wood Ducks, Deer, and countless species of birds that continue to thrive
in this setting. It is difficult to imagine any of these habitats thriving by paving a thoroughfare for biking
along the Creek. Pollution feeding the creek including road salt, fertilizer, and trash continue to be issues .
we struggle with while trying to keep the Creek healthy. In the paper this week there are concerns about
road salt finding its way into 9 Mile Creek already found to be well above safe levels for wildlife. It is
difficult to envision a solution providing the same protection of the Creek after a 16' wide path is added
(10 feet for paved path & 3 feet on each side for "shoulder"). Since the Nine Mike Creek area is already
rather narrow adding this path would mean that this amazing wildlife would no longer be able travel freely
up and down the Creek because of the increased usage. We would like to see the environmental impact
study for this project.
9 Mile Creek Watershed /Flooding — this area of the Creek often overflows the banks and floods into the
yards of the neighboring homes. In our yard alone after a day of heavy rainfall the creek floods into our
yard by more than 30 feet. If this path is to have 24 x 7 access, we assume the path would have to be
built up above the yearly flood level. It is hard to see how a path could be built up three to four feet above
the existing grade and allow for proper drainage and still be environmentally friendly, or aesthetically
pleasing.
Safety — Many areas of Nine Mile Creek are secluded and relatively remote. On Valley Lane - particularly
in the front of our homes, traffic is heavy and known to be an off freeway thoroughfare when traffic is
heavy on Highway 62. Many of us choose to send our children to the safety of the back yard for play. If a
path is built along the Creek that allows for biking, walking, during any hour of the day or night, we
question the safety for homes and children at play that remain close (within 100 feet specifically) to the
Creek boundaries. We understand that this path will be lit but we wonder about police supervision. as it
can be far from any street they currently patrol. In some areas homes are fairly close to the creek, under
100', this could be a concern. We also question the proximity to our schools - the proposed path will
connect to the Three Rivers Park District's regional trail network, which currently has more than 90 miles
of trail. This brings a large number of people each day into close proximity to our schools creating a
safety concern for many of us who have children attending those schools. Current mapping of
connectivity to the Hopkins bike trail connects us directly with a level three sex offender living near the
path as of one week ago.
Budget and Priorities — Today's current financial climate hardly seems the appropriate time to be
spending precious financial resources. The State budget deficit stands at more than $4.27 billion - much
of that affecting our schools. Both Valley View Middle School and The Edina High School have called
special meetings to discuss with the public the effects that budget cutbacks will be having on the
education of our children. The construction and ongoing maintenance of a bike trail does not fall into an
"absolute necessity" category as we face difficult financial and budgetary choices. It is extremely difficult
to hear as constituents of Edina that we have unknowingly funded money to The Three Rivers Park
District for a project that if completed we will be responsible as taxpayers to continue and sustain the
upkeep of.
This is a project that clearly jeopardizes the environment of one of the most beautiful wildlife areas we
host in Edina, and stands to change directly both the people and wildlife along its path. We look forward
to hearing you comments and solutions to each of these issues.
Z ly,
hnson
John Keprios
From: Cory Shubert [ notification +hpzl= pcz @facebookmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:35 PM
To: John Keprios
Subject: Edina residents opposing the nine mile creek bike path
facebook
Cory Shubert
12:34pm Feb 19th
2/19/2009
Edina residents opposing the nine mile creek bike
path
To jkeprios @cl.edina.mn.us
Please pass on to the council members and mayor that I have created a
Facebook group and will begin garnering support for this cause.
Anyone can check in and view what Is being said and I will encourage members
to post stories and photos of what nine mile creek means to them as it stands
today and why they oppose this bike path plan.
Thank you,
Cory Shubert
Cory has shared a link to a group with you. To view the group or to reply to the
message, follow this link:
http://www.facebook.coLn/p.pWi--57372600Z&Lk_+2pXLY5_P6QOIK BBEUCYTVS
Are your friends bothering you? You can opt out of emails from friends on
Facebook.
Page 1 of 1
John Keorios
From: Cory Shubert [cory@pixelagogo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:11 AM
To: John Keprios
Subject: Re: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
Good morning John, funny you should reply. I just finished reading the part about the
survey you sent out and the info next to your photo on the city of Edina's website...
I want to make sure my voice is one of concern and appreciation for what Edina has now and
not one of selfishness or "what's best for me ".
We live in a very large city, the Twin Cities, and Edina is just one part.
My family moved to Edina and fell in love with our home due largely to the wooded acres
behind it which are part of nine mile creek.
I am from northern MN. (Park Rapids) and I can tell you that when I walk out in my
backyard on a Saturday morning in the summer and close my eyes, I could easily be up north
in the middle of the forest. That is a very wonderful thing to be able to say while still
being less than 5 minutes from Southdale or 20 minutes from the airport.
While I feel secluded and private with the natural barrier back there, it is not in the
least cut off from anyone in the neighborhood to use and enjoy. There is rarely a day
that goes by that there are not kids back there or people walking dogs. What makes it
special is what also keeps it "real ", the undeveloped quality that is has evolved into.
My neighbors to our west were the first home on the south side of Abercrombie Dr. 40+
years ago. They tell of the nine mile creek area back when there were no trees really,
just an open space. They have watched it grow and mature to the natural beauty that it is
today due largely to the cities policy of NOT developing parkland. I have a lot of
footage of deer in our backyard that I am sure would disappear once the construction was
completed and the highway (sorry, that is a dig) the bike path was open.
If you would like to see a short sample of one of our visitors, watch this short clip:
http: / /vimeo.com /2197784
I hope at the meeting on March 9 we can hear what studies have been done by the DNR or
whomever and what impact to the ecosystem that is present there now this would have, as
well as why as a community we think recreation is more important that basic city
infrastructures like sidewalks? We would spend millions of dollars to create more bike
and walking paths and destroy wildlife habitat but our kids have to walk to and from bus
stops in the street? What or who thinks that is the better option?
Thank you again for taking the time to answer my email and I hope to get a chance to
introduce myself in person on March 9th.
Thank you,
> Cory,
> Thank you for your email.
> I will forward your email to the Edina City Council and Edina Park Board.
> Your input is greatly appreciated.
> John Keprios, Director
> Edina Park & Recreation Department
> 4801 W. 50th St.
> Edina, MN 55424
• Voice: (952) 826 -0430
• Fax: (952) 826 -0385
• jkeprios@ci.edina.mn.us
• "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs"
• - - - -- Original Message - - - --
• From: Cory Shubert [mailto:cory @pixelagogo.com]
• Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:46 PM
• To: Lynette Biunno
• Subject: The planned bike trail along Nine Mile Creek
> Hello,
• I just became aware of this proposal and want to voice my opposition
• to this idea.
• As a resident along the proposed path, 5209 Abercrombie Dr., this
• would ruin one the main reasons we moved to Edina and purchased the
• home we did, the natural, undeveloped area that sits right behind our home.
I do not want to increase the traffic that this area already has...
kids from the neighborhood and people from the neighborhood walking
dogs or just enjoying the little bit of "nature" that this part of
Edina has, and has kept this way for over 40 years.
I don't know who's idea it was to develop this as planned, but it
wasn't someone who lives here, that is very obvious.
We will be at the Monday meeting at city hall and will be very happy
to debate this with whomever wishes to.
Please DO NOT allow this to happen and let's find another way to spend
our cities money to enhance already developed areas to fulfill
whatever goal this ideas was supposed to do.
Thank you,
Cory, Susie, Vivian
5209 Abercrombie Dr.
Edina, MN. 55439
952 - 915 -1952
and Sullivan Shubert
Cory
http: / /www.coryshubertphotography.com
cory @pixelagogo.com
952- 334 -4648
2
Good morning John, funny you should reply. I just finished reading the
part about the survey you sent out and the info next to your photo on
the city of Edina's website...
I want to make sure my voice is one of concern and appreciation for
what Edina has now and not one of selfishness or "what's best for me ".
We live in a very large city, the Twin Cities, and Edina is just one
part.
My family moved to Edina and fell in love with our home due largely to
the wooded acres behind it which are part of nine mile creek.
I am from northern MN. (Park Rapids) and I can tell you that when I
walk out in my backyard on a Saturday morning in the summer and close
my eyes, I could easily be up north in the middle of the forest. That
is a very wonderful thing to be able to say while still being less than
5 minutes from Southdale or 20 minutes from the airport.
While I feel secluded and private with the natural barrier back there,
it is not in the least cut off from anyone in the neighborhood to use
and enjoy. There is rarely a day that goes by that there are not kids
back there or people walking dogs. What makes it special is what also
keeps it "real ", the undeveloped quality that is has evolved into.
My neighbors to our west were the first home on the south side of
Abercrombie Dr. 40+ years ago. They tell of the nine mile creek area
back when there were no trees really, just an open space. They have
watched it grow and mature to the natural beauty that it is today due
largely to the cities policy of NOT developing parkland. I have a lot
of footage of deer in our backyard that I am sure would disappear once
the construction was completed and the highway (sorry, that is a dig)
the bike path was open.
If you would like to see a short sample of one of our visitors, watch
this short clip:
http: / /vimeo.com /2197784
I hope at the meeting on March 9 we can hear what studies have been
done by the DNR or whomever and what impact to the ecosystem that is
present there now this would have, as well as why as a community we
think recreation is more important that basic city infrastructures like
sidewalks? We would spend millions of dollars to create more bike and
walking paths and destroy wildlife habitat but our kids have to walk to
and from bus stops in the street? What or who thinks that is the
better option?
Thank you again for taking the time to answer my email and I hope to
get a chance to introduce myself in person on March 9th.
Thank you,
Cory,
Thank you for your email.
I will forward your email to the Edina City Council and Edina Park
Board. Your input is greatly appreciated.
John Keprios, Director
• Edina Park & Recreation Department
• 4801 W. 50th St.
• Edina, MN 55424
• Voice: (952) 826 -0430
• Fax: (952) 826 -0385
• jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us
• "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs"
• - - - -- Original Message - - - --
• From: Cory Shubert (mailto:cory@ ixelagogo.com]
• Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:46 PM
• To: Lynette Biunno
• Subject: The planned bike trail along Nine Mile Creek
> Hello,
• I just became aware of this proposal and want to voice my opposition
• to this idea.
• As a resident along the proposed path, 5209 Abercrombie Dr., this
• would ruin one the main reasons we moved to Edina and purchased the
• home we did, the natural, undeveloped area that sits right behind our
home.
• I do not want to increase the traffic that this area already has...
• kids from the neighborhood and people from the neighborhood walking
• dogs or just enjoying the little bit of "nature" that this part of
• Edina has, and has kept this way for over 40 years.
• I don't know who's idea it was to develop this as planned, but it
• wasn't someone who lives here, that is very obvious.
• We will be at the Monday meeting at city hall and will be very happy
• to debate this with whomever wishes to.
> Please DO NOT allow this to happen and let's find another way to
spend
• our cities money to enhance already developed areas to fulfill
• whatever goal this ideas was supposed to do.
> Thank you,
> Cory, Susie, Vivian and Sullivan Shubert
> 5209 Abercrombie Dr.
> Edina, MN. 55439
> 952- 915 -1952
Cory
http:/ /www.coryshubertphotographV.com
cory @pixelagogo.com
952- 334 -4648
Page 1 of 3
John Keprios
From: lucky4317 @aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:22 PM
To: John Keprios
Subject: Re: Nine Mile Creek trail proposal
John,
FYI ... The following is a copy of the email I sent to Three Rivers Park and it is also the same
as the letter I sent directly to Kelly Grissman.
I am writing this letter regarding the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail proposals for
Edina. I attended the open house on Feb. 11th and both studied the map enlargements
and chatted with Kelly Grissman. I was quite upset after learning that the trail #2
proposal runs literally through my backyard as well as the backyards of my neighbors. My
home at 6621 Londonderry Drive is located on the wetland area.
I am opposed to this trail #2 proposal for several reasons. First, we purchased our
home only 5 months ago and one of the reasons we bought this home was due to the
privacy and location on the wetlands. We specifically asked about the possibility of any
building or altering of the wetland area and were told this is a protected area and nothing
of that sort would occur. Understandably, my family was very upset to learn about the
Three Rivers proposal of a 10 -ft. wide asphalt path for public access -day and night --
which would run through our property. We would never have purchased this home had we
known something like this was a possibility. People make a conscious decision to live near
an existing park, lake, playground, golf course or other area regularly accessed by the
public. Clearly, those of us20who live along the wetland area made this decision because
we want to enjoy the privacy and the wildlife of this location.
Second, the wetland area is first and foremost a wildlife sanctuary. Public access
with a multi -use trail would most certainly disrupt the wildlife habitat. We all know the
wildlife habitat in the suburban areas is shrinking with the construction of housing,
buildings and freeways. In particular, the area in our neighborhood along the creek is the
only safe way for deer to travel between Hopkins and Edina without having to cross busy
Highway 169. We often see deer grazing in our backyard in the early morning hours and
at dinner time which would most likely be popular times for joggers, walkers and bikers to
be on the trail. Obviously, deer would abandon their once quiet and safe environment. It
is unconscionable to think that anyone or any group would seriously consider disruption of
the wildlife habitat simply to provide a scenic ride or walk.
Third, the trail option #2 causes a security concern. Because the loc ation of the
trail would run either directly through or along property lines, this brings the public right
2/18/2009
Page 2 of 3
into our backyard and the yards of our neighbors where children play and pets are
kept. There is also the concern for the security of our homes with the public having easy
access to our properties. Unlike the city streets, this trail would be difficult for Edina
Police to patrol.
Finally, Edina currently has almost 40 public parks and 7 walking paths for the
enjoyment of its residents and visitors. Most, if not all, of these are easily accessible by
existing roads. We would favor the option of the proposed trail #3 as a way to connect
Hopkins to Edina via Lincoln Drive to Vernon Avenue to Bredesen Park walkway. Vernon
Avenue already has an existing bike lane designated for bikers and joggers. This option
uses existing roadways and walkways and costs nothing.
I appreciate this opportunity to express my concerns about the Nine Mile Creek
proposed Edina trails. I also would love to have you visit our nei ghborhood and see for
yourself how the proposed trail #2 would impact my family and my neighbors. Please call
me and stop by. If I may make a suggestion, it would have been helpful to have had the
map enlargements left at Edina City Hall for a period of a week so residents could come
at their convenience and take their time to write feedback notes. This would be an
improvement of only two hours on one evening.
Thank you,
Patricia Hasselstrom
6621 Londonderry Drive, Edina, MN
952 - 920 -2101
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: John Keprios <JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us>
To: Lucky4317 @aol.com
Sent: Thu, =2 012 Feb 2009 3:58 pm
Subject: Handout
Feel free to contact me with any questions.
Thank you,
John Keprios, Director
Edina Park & Recreation Department
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Voice: (952) 826 -0430
Fax: (952) 826 -0385
Ikeprios@ci.edina.mn.us
2/18/2009
Page 3 of 3
We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs"
<<Handout Small Handout.pdf>>
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See. ours in_iust 2-easy steps!
2/18/2009
Page 1 of 1
John Keprios
From: Joanne Bolduc Ugbolduc @msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 7:36 AM
To: jvlaming @threeriversparkdistrict.org
Cc: John Keprios
Subject: Bike Trail segment 16
Dear Mr. Vlaming and Mr. Keprios,
We live at 7001 West Shore Drive (intersection of West Shore and 70th) and are writing to
encourage you to use 66th Street in Edina as a bike trail path and not 70th street for Segment
16. There are several reasons for this idea.
First, 66th street is both a logical and aesthetic decision in that it would link with already existing
trails. The trail would go by the pool and the park and enhance an already beautiful area. My
sister, who lives in St. Louis Park and is an avid biker, was thrilled when she found out about the
possibility of a link on 66th. She will not use a 70th street trail as 70th is too busy and not very
pretty or relaxing. Auto exhaust also inhibits a fulfilling bike ride.
If we want to encourage recreational biking and healthy family exercise, it makes sense to put a
trail on a safer site with already established links
Second, the study committee for 70th street concluded that parking was important on both
sides!!! A bike trail would require the taking of land, blvds, tree canopies etc. And a loss of all
parking for half of those on 70th. We are already dealing with possible other encroachments
which would bring the street /trail extraordinarily close to the living room and bedrooms of many
on 70th street.
Finally, I am concerned about the driveways of those on 70th. How would it impact those
driveways- especially drainage?
I have always appreciated the biking and hiking trails within the park systems A trail on 66th
meets that criteria much better than 70th.
We appreciate your attention to our viewpoint.
Joanne and AI Bolduc
2/17/2009
Page 1 of 1
John Keprios
From: John Ferrell Wcferrell @comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:36 PM
To: jvlaming @threeriversparkdistrict.com; John Keprios
Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
Feb. 13, 2009
Gentlemen,
Thank you for your presentation on February 10tH
I hope you consider the impact of the off -road bike trail proposal for segment 16. 1 am a homeowner of a
suburban, 90' wide lot. As proposed, the trail would come within 40 feet of my front door.
It would also remove a section of my concrete driveway. Increased, 24 hour lighting and the substantial loss of
trees in the right of way are detrimental to the value of my property. This change of infrastructure
to parkland would be an intrusion into the residential feel of my property.
The community's need for recreational biking would be better served on West 66th Street. A path there would
provide access to the amenities around Lake Cornelia: the arts center, pool, Frisbee golf course and pavilions.
Segment 15 is a safer roadway. The traffic count is only 3800 cars per day and has an overpass across Highway
100. Segment 15 is scenic and connects with preexisting bike paths in Rosland Park.
Thank you for your consideration,
Jan Ferrell
4704 West 70th Street
Edina, Minn. 55435
952 - 920 -8822
2/13/2009
John Keorios
From: Jed_Hepworth @cargill.com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:59 PM
To: John Keprios
Cc: cschwinghammer @techfluent.com
Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Open Houses Feb 11 & Mar 9 - follow up questions.
Importance: High
Dear Mr Keprios -
I'm resending as our system said the first attempt failed.., and I forgot to cc. Chad.
It was nice to meet you last night. Thanks for all you and your staff
do to make Heights Park and the other parks
such an asset for Edina.
We think the current mix of wonderful people - friendly parks and a little bit of wildness
with animals and birds and burrs and bushes is what Edina needs.
jed hepworth
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Hepworth, Jed H. - Jed_Hepworth@cargill.com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:19 PM
To: jvlaming @threeriversparkdistrict.org
Cc: John Keprios; 'PamJ @chenillemagic.com'; HarveyJ @actgroup.com;
thompson_davidj@yahoo.com; Lee.Schubert @CO.DAKOTA.MN.US; edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us
Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Open Houses Feb 11 & Mar 9 - follow up questions.
Importance: High
fr. Jonathan Vlaming
Senior Manager of Planning
Three Rivers Park District
CC. John Keprios /Park & Rec Director /Edina
Joni Bennett /City Council
Mayor James Hovland
Mary Brindle /City Council
Ann Swenson /City Council
Scott Housh /City Council
Dear Mr. Vlaming:
We thought the open house last night was a good first step in helping Edina residents
understand the impact of the proposed trail routings.
Thank you.
We had some questions that didn't get answered last night and I hope you will help us.
1. DECISION RIGHTS - There was a lot of residual confusion about decision rights that I
hope you can help us clarify.
In discussions with Joni Bennett and Kelly Grissman, we heard variously
that:
a) the decision on routing is a joint City of Edina /Three Rivers Park District decision;
` that the decision is a Three Rivers Park District decision; and
c) that the decision is a joint Three Rivers Park District /Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District decision.
1
Can you please clarify for us who will make the decision on the routing of the proposed
trail?
I think it would be very helpful to have at the next open house some clarity on decision
rights and also on the dates and locations at which the routing is going to be reviewed
with the City Council and the Edina
School District. The interests of all Edina residents on all sides of
this issue should be represented at those meetings, not just the Edina Bike Task Force or
other proponent of any particular route.
2. NEXT STEPS - Can you please advise us also:
i) when will the dates, times and locations of the next City Council and Board of
Education meetings to discuss the routing be known and how we can find out well in
advance?
ii) what kind of notification of the next open house and the public meetings regarding the
trail will be sent and when and to whom?
As Edina residents whose residences are directly affected by the Three River Park
District's preferred routing, it was very disappointing to not be advised about the open
houses or the process by the the District
or the City. We only found out about the issue from the Star Tribune
article. The City and the Park District owe it to citizens directly
affected to give them notice well in advance of these meetings.
3. COSTS - when is cost going to be put on the table?
One of the posters last night mentioned that cost will be estimated once the route is
chosen, but cost must be one of the factors in the choice,
not just a consequence of it.
With the US economy tanking and Governor Pawlenty announcing a US$7 billion state deficit
and slashing money for everything, how can cost be
an afterthought to ANY routing of the trail? As taxpayers we want
costs of maintenance as well as construction on the table when discussing routing.
4. ,OPEN MEETING - ATTENDEES
Finally, since people were asked to sign in as a condition of participation in the open
house, I would like to have a copy of the sign in list, so that all sides of this issue
can communicate with those who
have demonstrated an interest in this issue. Heather would not commit
to give me a copy, asserting "confidentiality ". ? ??
While I certainly recognize Heather isn't making that decision, I would like your
explanation for denying me a copy of what clearly is public
information. If this information isn't going to be used to communicate
with people by the Park District or EBTF or other proponents of the trail and particular
routings, why did you collect email and other
addresses? We are happy to have our information listed as persons
interested in this issue.
I look forward to your prompt response.
H. Jed Hepworth
2
ThreeRivers
PARK DISTRICT
February 17, 2009
Three Rivers
Dear Mr. Hepworth:
Park District
Board of
Mr. H. Jed Hepworth
Commissioners
5509 Valley Lane
Edina, MN 55439
Sara Wyatt
Dear Mr. Hepworth:
District 1
Thank you for attending the first Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Open House. The
Open House serves as the first step in the public process for identifying a preferred
route for the regional trail through the City of Edina.
Marilynn Corcoran,
Vice Chair
District 2
Regarding decision rights, several different alignments are in the process of being
examined with regard to technical and social feasibility by an assessment team
comprised of staff from the City of Edina, Three Rivers Park District, Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District, Bike Edina, a citizens group, and the Edina Public Schools.
,rksHagg3rty
Residents of Edina and of suburban Hennepin County are being asked to provide
their input in this
process and that input will be considered as part of the social
feasibility assessment of the various trail alignments. The
assessment team will
provide the Edina City Council with their professional assessment of the alignments,
along with a recommendation of one alignment for consideration for approval. The
Dale W k
Edina School Board will be the first authority to consider approval of the
recommended alignment if that alignment includes School
Distrrict ict 4
a
District land. The Edina
Park Board would then consider approval of the recommended alignment for
consideration by the Edina City Council. The Edina City Council would then consider
adoption of the recommended alignment of the regional trail through the City. After
Rosemary Franzese
the City Council has identified and approved a recommended alignment, the Three
Districts
Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners would consider adopting the
recommended regional trail alignment forwarded by the Edina City Council.
At this time, it is not known when those decisions will occur. The Park District and
Larry Blackstad, Chair
City of Edina are working to develop a project information page on their web sites for
Appointed
the interested public to track progress on this ro'ect and to be made aware of
project
upcoming meetings.
The February 11th open house was very well publicized, as was evident by the strong
Joan Peters, turnout. The next open house is scheduled for Monday, March 9. Notice of that
Appointed meeting will be posted in the local papers and on the City and Park District websites.
In addition, all residents living adjacent to any trail segment under study will receive
a direct mailing notice of the open house. Those attendees of the February 11 open
house, who provided their name and mailing address, will also receive a direct
Cris Gears invitation to attend the March 9 open house. Post card notices of the open house will
•intendent be sent to residents living within the general vicinity of the trail segments under
study. Notices of open houses are typically sent out two weeks prior to the open
house date.
Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299
Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 • www.ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org
Cost of regional trail construction, operations, and maintenance is typically the
responsibility of Three Rivers Park District. Costs will be part of the technical
assessment of each of the potential trail alignments. At this time, costs have not
been calculated due to the uncertainty in final trail alignment with characteristics
specific to each alignment. The benefits and constraints, including expected costs of
each trail segment, will be discussed with the Park District's Board of Commissioners
prior to identification of a recommended alignment by the assessment team.
As previously stated, attendees of the February 11th open house were asked to sign
in, providing their names and method for which they could be contacted. The Park
District requested this information so that attendees could be sent an invitation to
the second open house. Having received your written request for that information, I
am now able to provide you with copies of the names and addresses found on the
sign -in sheets (enclosed in PDF format).
Please contact me if you have further questions or concerns.
Respectfully,
4��vv
Jonathan Vlaming
Senior Manager of Planning
763.694.7632
jvlaming Calthreeriversparkdistrict org
Enclosure
C: Mayor James B. Hovland, City of Edina
John Keprios, Park & Recreation Director, City of Edina
Joni Bennett, Edina City Council
Mary Brindle, Edina City Council
Ann Swenson, Edina City Council
Scot Housh, Edina City Council
Dale Woodbeck, Commissioner, Three Rivers Park District
Cris Gears, Superintendent, Three Rivers Park District
John Keprios
From: Lynette Biunno
Ient: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:02 AM
d'o: John Keprios
Subject: FW: Bike paths throught Edina
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Lorenzo Tunesi [ mailto :lorenzo.tunesi@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:50 AM
To: feedback @threeriversparkdistrict.org; Lynette Biunno
Subject: Bike paths throught Edina
Please forward this to the appropriate person(s).
Thank you.
Hi;
I would like to commend you for the work done to prepare various options for bike paths in
Edina. As a resident I strongly prefer the path option that follows Nine Mile Creek as
opposed to options that follow roads. From both scenic and safety perspectives it is much
better to be away from cars. Think about bike paths in Minneapolis and how pleasant it is
to be following Minnehaha creek, something like that would be a tremendous asset for
Edina.
Best regards,
Lorenzo Tunesi
4413 Ellsworth Drive
Edina, MN 55435
From: Dianne Plunkett Latham [mailto: Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:33 PM
To: Dianne Plunkett Latham
Subject: Three Rivers /9 Mile Creek Bike Trail Open House on March 9 at 6 -8 pm City Hall
2 -25 -09
Dear EEC and RSW WG,
I am appalled by the inaccuracies and scare tactics employed by the opponents to the 9MC bike
trail at their www.9MileCreek.ora web site. Please circulate the attached flier to supporters of the
bike trail so that they can appear at the March 9 Open house at City Hall from 6 — 8 pm and
show support for the trail. Perhaps Halley can circulate the flier to Project Earth, Germana to
LWVE's Action Line, Paul to MNA and any others of you who may know interested parties. The
creek is not the private property of those who Live along it, but is an amenity to be enjoyed by all
residents. Dianne
From: alihul @aol.com [mailto:alihul @aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: Three Rivers Ad 9 Mile Creek Trail
This is the notice for the next open house. Opponents to the trail have asked for and been
given contact info on everyone who was at the last open house. I would advise not
signing in unless you would like to be contacted by this group. People who own property
along the creek will be mailed info on the meeting, but possible user groups will not. So,
it is up to us to spread the word, ask people to come and to comment on the route. Please
email this flyer to people who would be interested, make copies and post around the City.
It is important this be a well publicized event. Encourage people to comment on
the route. 3 Rivers takes these comments very seriously. Opponents have set up a web
site- www.9MileCreek.org ( the watershed official site is www.ninemilecreek.org.) We
should all take a look at it.
Alice
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Jonathan Vlaming <JVlaming @threeriversparkdistrict.org>
To: alihul @aol.com
Sent: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 9:52 am
Subject: FW: Three Rivers Ad
Hi Alice - attached is the Ad for the open house that will be running in the Sun.
Jonathan Vlaming
Senior Manager of Planning
Three Rivers Park District
3000 Xenium Ln N
Plymouth, MN 55441
(763) 694 -7632
Cell (612) 490 -5220
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Lorenzo Tunesi ( m_ ailto:lorenzo.tunesi(,�,gmail.comJ
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:50 AM
To: feedback @threeriversparkdistrict.org; Lynette Biunno
Subject: Bike paths throught Edina
Please forward this to the appropriate person(s).
Thank you.
Hi,
I would like to commend you for the work done to prepare various
options for bike paths in Edina. As a resident I strongly prefer the
path option that follows Nine Mile Creek as opposed to options that
follow roads. From both scenic and safety perspectives it is much
better to be away from cars. Think about bike paths in Minneapolis and
how pleasant it is to be following Minnehaha creek, something like that
would be a tremendous asset for Edina.
Best regards,
Lorenzo Tunesi
4413 Ellsworth Drive
Edina, MN 55435