Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-06-16_COUNCIL MEETINGi AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 16, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of June 2, 2009 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 2, 2009 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings, " the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & FINAL REZONING - Ebenezer Society, 7500 York Avenue, Resolution No. 2009 -57, Ordinance No. 850 -A33 Agenda/Edina City Council June 16, 2009 Page 2 III. AWARD OF BID * A. Insurance Renewals: 1. Workers Compensation 2. General Liability 3. Property * B. Contract No. ENG 09 -11 St. John's Park Neighborhood Street Reconstruction * C. Contract No. QK09 -2PK Park Parking Lot & Pathway Improvement Maintenance IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2009 -56 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) * B. Traffic Safety Report of June 3, 2009 * C. Chowen Park Garden - Continued to July 21, 2009 * D. Grant Agreement with Minnesota Historical Society, Res. No. 2009 -58 * E Resolution No. 2009 -53 Approving Lot Division, 4306 Grimes Avenue, 4201 Morningside Road V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment, " the City Council will invite comments from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on tonight's agenda. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was held by the Council within the last thirty days or a matter scheduled for a future hearing on a specific date. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated June 4, 2009, TOTAL $476,448.69; and Pre -List dated June 11, 2009 TOTAL $930,719.06 and Credit Card Transactions dated April 27, 2009 to May 23, 2009, TOTAL $6,124.73. I Agenda /Edina City Council June 16, 2009 Page 3 Tues Tues Tues Sat Tues Tues Fri Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Petition - Country Club Roadway Reconstruction Project B. Receive Petition Requesting Sidewalk West Frontage Road, Benton Avenue to Valley View Road C. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Jun 2 Jun 16 Jun 16 Jun 20 Jun 23 Jun 23 July 3 July 7 July 21 July 28 Aug 3 Aug 4 Aug 18 Aug 25 Sep 1 Sep 7 Sep 15 Sep 22 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLAZA ENTRANCE TO CEN LK PK COMMUNITY ROOM WARREN C. HYDE CLUBHOUSE Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Work Session with Energy & Environment Commission 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. PROMENADE GRAND OPENING 1:00 P.M. Study Session - Street Light Utility 7:30 A.M. Employee Recognition Lunch 11:00 A.M INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Study Session - To be determined 7:00 A.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. NIGHT TO UNITE Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Town Hall Meeting 7:00 -8:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRUM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 2, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, and Assistant Chair Housh. Absent was Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by seconded by Commissioner Swenson for approval Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Housh Motion carried. Commissioner Bennett and of the Edina Housing and *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 19, 2009, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for May 19, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the payment of claims dated May 28, 2009, TOTAL $603.86. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Assistant Chair Housh declared the meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 2, 2009 7:04 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Pro Tern Housh. Absent at rollcall was Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda with the exceptions of Items III.B.3., Set Hearing Date for Zoning Ordinance Amendment 850.11 Regarding Accessory Buildings; and, III.C., Resolution No. 2009 -53 Approving Lot Division, 4306 Grimes Avenue, 4201 Morningside Road. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Housh Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 19, 2009, AND WORK SESSION OF MAY 19, 2009 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 19, 2009, and Work Session of May 19, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — TH 100 WEST FRONTAGE ROAD SIDEWALK — CONTRACT NO. ENG 09 -2 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for TH 100 West Frontage Road Sidewalk Contract No. ENG 09 -2; Improvement No. S -048A to the recommended low bidder, DMJ Corporation at $128,788.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -55 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Pro Tern Housh explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -55 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Housh Motion carried. *HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING ITEMS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to set July 7, 2009, as the. hearing date for conditional use permit, Interlachen Country Club, 6200 Interlachen Boulevard and to set June 16, 2009, as the hearing date for consideration of Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, Ebenezer Society, 7500 York Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING ITEM The City Council .requested copies of the 1992 meeting minutes referenced in the staff report and asked questions of staff about meeting notification. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to set July 7, 2009, as the hearing date for consideration of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Section 850.11 regarding accessory buildings. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Housh Motion carried. Page 1 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /June 2, 2009 RESOLUTION NO 2009 -53 — LOT DIVISION REQUEST, 4306 GRIMES AVENUE, 4201 MORNINGSIDE ROAD Assistant City Manager Worthington advised this item would be held over until June 16, 2009. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -54 ADOPTED — APPROVING HENNEPIN COUNTY POLICE JOINT & COOPERATIVE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -54 approving the Joint and Cooperative Agreement governing use of law enforcement personnel and equipment by various' agencies. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT Nathan Franzen, 6216 Maloney Avenue, requested that the publication for the proposed accessory building code amendment contain a detailed explanation. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 21, 2009, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $513,854.58; Communications Fund $6,455.56; Police Special Revenue $399.97; City Hall Debt Service $2,000.00; Working Capital Fund $16,227.74; Art Center Fund $3,075.58; Golf Dome Fund $10,690.98; Aquatic Center Fund $24,924.80; Golf Course Fund $30,940.82; Ice Arena Fund $10,166.05; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $21,101.25; Liquor Fund $205,334.46; Utility Fund $57,788.88; Storm Sewer Fund $2,953.80; Recycling Fund $20.00; PSTF Agency Fund $4,195.60; TOTAL $910,130.07 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 28, 2009, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $119,797.12; Communications Fund $2,823.25; Working Capital Fund $51,139.43; Art Center Fund $2,228.28; Golf Dome Fund $3,912.50; Aquatic Center Fund $59,478.43; Golf Course Fund $13,107.13; Ice Arena Fund $1,277.57; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $12,260.81; Liquor Fund $190,104.01; Utility Fund $160,566.94; Storm Sewer Fund $138,819.44; PSTF Agency Fund $2,703.94; TOTAL $758,218.85. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. TIME CHANGE FOR THE STREET LIGHT UTILITY STUDY SESSION APPROVED Following discussion, Council consensus was reached to approve a time change for the street light utility study session on June 23, 2009 from 11:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Pro Tern Housh declared the meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 16, 2009. Scott Housh, Mayor Pro Tern Video Copy of the June 2, 2009, meeting available. Page 2 To: Mayor & City Council REPURT/RECUMMhN 17ATIUN Agenda Item II.A Planning Commission Recommended Action: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning and Final Plat. See the findings and conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes, staff report and resolution. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the requested variance for the maximum square footage for 17 dwelling units, and a three -foot setback variance on a 3 -2 votes for each variance. See the attached draft minutes, staff report and resolution for the specific findings. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the City Council approve the Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning, Final Plan, and uphold the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the variances. Information (Background: See attached Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals reports; Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Commission minutes and development plans. Consent F] From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: June 16, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan with Action ® Motion Variances, and a Final Plat for a 76 -unit 4 -story addition to ® Resolution 7500 York Avenue ® Ordinance Discuss1on Planning Commission Recommended Action: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning and Final Plat. See the findings and conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes, staff report and resolution. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the requested variance for the maximum square footage for 17 dwelling units, and a three -foot setback variance on a 3 -2 votes for each variance. See the attached draft minutes, staff report and resolution for the specific findings. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the City Council approve the Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning, Final Plan, and uphold the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the variances. Information (Background: See attached Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals reports; Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Commission minutes and development plans. ,> RESOLUTION NO. 2009-57 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR 7500 YORK AVENUE COOPERATIVE City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Ebenezer Society on behalf of the 7500 York Avenue Cooperative is requesting a Final Development Plan review with Variances at 7500 York Avenue. 1.02 The applicant is proposing to build a 76 -unit, 4 -story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9 -story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. 1.03 The applicant has submitted a Certification of Action by the 7500 Board of Directors, and a vote of its residents, authorizing Ebenezer to pursue the request. 1.04 The following variances are required to accommodate the request: 1. A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units. 2. A 3 -foot building setback variance from Edinborough Way. 1.05 The specific Variances would allow 10 two - bedroom units to be over the maximum 850 square feet for two - bedroom units; and 7 one - bedroom units to be over the maximum 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. 1.06 On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. 1.07 On June 4, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard the applicant's variance requests. The variances were approved on a vote of 3 -2. 1.08 Staff appealed the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow the City Council to take final action on the entire development proposal. Section 2. FINDINGS - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2.01 The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. 2.02 The proposed addition is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. 2.03 The proposed density is compatible with densities in the area. 2.04 Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing is a need in the City. City2HR11 The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-57 Page Two 2.06 On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan, and Rezoning. Section 3. FINDINGS - VARIANCES 3.01 There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the location of the existing underground parking deck, which would not support the proposed addition. In addition, the proposed building location avoids the large open space and garden area along York Avenue. Therefore, the applicant is forced to develop a site plan by working around this structure and the open space. 3.02 The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building, and the height of buildings in the area. The density of the project allowed by City Code would be 44 units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 36 units. Therefore, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and a reasonable request, given the practical difficulty of having to design a building around the underground parking ramp. 3.03 The building layout of the area where the variance is requested was driven by the Alzheimer's floor. The rooms are very small. To take three feet off any of the rooms would not be practical given the needs within the facility, including room windows. Eliminating the variance would create obstacles and safety issues for the memory care residents. 3.04 The setback variance is for a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback. 3.05 The requested setback variance for the building is adjacent to a parking lot to the west. 3.06 The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two - bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. 3.07 It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. 3.08 The intent of the maximum square footage standards was to ensure some affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential Districts. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). 3.09 The average unit size is 601 square feet, well below the maximum size requirement. 3.10 The Zoning Ordinance requirement for maximum unit sizes for senior housing should be reconsidered for its appropriateness by the Planning Commission and City Council. f- S RESOLUTION NO. 2009-57 Page Two Section 4. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan and Variances for the proposed addition at 7500 York. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2009. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. The following must be submitted to the City before a building permit it is issued: a. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. b. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 21, 2009. 5. The design and construction of the project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 6. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on , 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2009-57 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009. City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 850-A33 AN ORDINANCE REZONING 7500 YORK AVENUE FROM PRD-4, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO PSR-4, PLANNED SENIOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. 1.01 The subject property is hereby rezoned from PRD-4, Planned Residential District to PSR-4, Planned Senior District based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. 2. The proposed addition is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. 3. The proposed density is compatible with densities in the area. 4. Given the City of Edina s aging population, senior housing is a need in the City. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Section 2. 2.01 The subject property is legally described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Seventy Five Hundred York Campus. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009. City Clerk DRAFT PC MINUTES MAY 27, 2009 2008.0027.09a Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan Ebenezer Society on behalf of 7500 York 7500 York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative is proposing to build a 76 -unit, 4' story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9 7story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. Planner Teague explained of the 76 units, 47 units would be for assisted living, 16 would be of memory care and 13 eldercare suites::Access to the site would be off Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. Parking would be provided underground, and within a small surface lot off Parklawn,Avenue. (See the applicant narrative and plans on pages A5 —A39, and within the attached development books.) Also "see the results of the vote of residents authorizing Ebenezer to move forward with the final plans on pages A7 —Al2. Planner Teague reminded the Commission this proposed project has received Preliminary Approval by the City Co4ncil, per Planning Commission recommendation and.the proposal required the following: 1. ;Final Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District to PSR -4, Planned Senior Development District. 2. Final Development Plan. 3. ,.Variances. (To be "reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals.): a: A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units. b. A,3 -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way. 4. Lot Division /Final,Plat. The site exists as two lots today. The lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. Planner Teague stated the site is currently zoned PRD -4, but exists with senior housing. As such, the site is non - conforming in regard to parking requirements. Senior housing does not require the same number of parking stalls that an all - age residential development would. The rezoning would bring the parking requirements into conformance with the City Code. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 2 of 8 The proposed use and rezoning for this site is reasonable and consistant with the approved Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezonin for the following reasons: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans. The number of rooms, building material, building footprint, and circulation patterns are all the same as the previously approved plans. 2. The proposed additional multiple - family senior housing would be compatible within the area as there are multiple family residential facilities to the north, south, east and west. 3. The proposed density of 36 units per acre meets the City's Code requirement for density in the Planned Senior Housing District; and is generally consistent with densities of existing apartment buildings in the area. 4. The sites close proximity to amenities that seniors would take advantage of, such as the YMCA, Centennial Lakes Park, and the Promenade. 5. Sustainable Design. The applicant is proposing sustainable design principles, consistent with those proposed as part of the Preliminary Development Plan. 6. As mentioned above, the existing roadways would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both Wenck and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 20, 2008, and recommended that the traffic generated would not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems. 7. The project would provide an additional opportunity for senior housing within the City of Edina. Based on the demographic data from the Comprehensive Plan, and the fact that there is a lengthy waiting list to get into the existing facility, the proposed new senior housing would fill a need in the City. It may also allow existing, residents in single - family homes within the city who want to remain in Edina, and opportunity to stay. The result may provide opportunity for a new family with kids to move to the city into the single - family home that was made available by a new resident to this facility. Planner Teague stated staff believes that the PSR -4 district is appropriate for the site. The rezoning would bring the existing site more into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The site exists today with senior housing, however, is zoned for "all -age" multiple - family residential. The site is parked for seniors; however, the current zoning requires parking for "all -age" multiple - family residential. If the PC Meeting May 27, 2009 .Page 3 of 8 addition were proposed under the existing zoning designation, additional variances would be required. A density variance and a parking stall variance would be required. The density requirement under the current zoning would allow only 27 additional units on the site. The parking stalls required under the current zoning would be 832 total spaces; and 395 are proposed. By rezoning the site to match the existing and proposed use of the site, the density and parking would be code compliant. Staff also believes the proposed variances are reasonable for this site. The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two- bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. The maximum standards were developed to ensure affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential districts. The existing and proposed units within the 7500 development were and are not intended to be entirely for affordable housing. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). Ten two- bedroom units and seven one - bedroom units would exceed the maximum requirement. In regard to the setback variance, the hardship is caused by the existing location of the underground parking garage. This structure was not' built to support the weight of a four -story addition above it. Therefore, the applicant developed a site plan working around this structure. They also do not wish to disturb the open space and garden area along York Avenue. The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building, and the height of buildings in the area. The requested variance would be a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback.. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PRD4 to PSR -4, Final Development Plan and Preliminary & Final Plat to,build a 76 -unit four -story addition to the existing building at 7500 York Avenue for the Ebenezer, Society, on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative. Approval is,subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. 2. The proposed addition is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. 3. The proposed density is compatible with densities in the area. 4. Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing is a need in the City. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 4 of 8 Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2009.. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2009. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. The following must be submitted to the City before a building permit it is issued: a. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. b. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 3 The design and construction of the project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 4.. All buildings must, be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. Appearing for the Applicant Mark Thomas and Susan Farr, Ebenezer Society, Ward Issacson, Pope Associates, Inc. and Russ Helgesen, resident of 7500 York. Applicant Presentation Mr. Thomas addressed the Commission and informed them Ebenezer has worked very hard not only with city staff but with residents of the 7500 building to present the project in its completed form. Mr. Thomas said in his opinion the proposed building with serve not only the area well, but the entire community. Mr. Thomas reported the latest technologies will be implemented to enhance the quality of life of the residents. The building will also serve as a base of employment. Russ Helgesen, 7500 York Avenue #208, told the Commission he is a 12 -year resident of 7500 York and the chair of the assisted living ad hoc committee. Mr. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 5 of 8 Helgesen told Commissioners that 7500 York was the first co -op of its kind, and has been very successful. Mr. Helgesen reported that 7500 York has been a leader in the field of senior housing and the proposal before the Commission this evening continues that leadership role. Mr. Helgeson said in his opinion the construction of the assisted living building is the most important issue that has come before the residents at 7500 York since their door opened 30 + years ago. Mr. Helgesen reported that recently the residents of 7500 York voted on the project and the official vote was that 75% of the residents were in favor of the project. Mr. Helgesen pointed out that is a very decisive.vote, adding the residents are now eager for the construction phase to begin. Concluding, Mr. Helgesen asked the Commission for their support. Ward Issacson addressed the Commission and with graphics gave a brief overview of the project. Mr. Issacson pointed out the plans haven't changed much since preliminary approval. Continuing, Mr., Issacson said the major goal of the project was to retain as much green space as possible and minimize the impact of parking areas. Mr. Issacson explained the exterior building materials will be cultured stone, stucco siding with stone trim, hardi board; and rockface block. The building will also have a mansard roof that keeps the building he down and adds a residential feel to the building. Mr.,lssacson said the building also steps down, and contains a decorative band to help break up building mass A memory courtyard and dining plaza area are also included in the development. Questions and comments from the Commission Commissioner Staunton'questioned the 3 -foot encroachment requiring a variance. Mr. lssacson explained that the reason for the 3 -foot intrusion into the setback was to provide the best possible living conditions for the memory care residents while. "staying off' the existing underground garage. Mr. Issacson stressed theimportance of a secured entry and the inclusion of lounge elements positioned at the ends of. the hallway, adding it is very important for those with memory disabilities that there are no dead ends. Chair Fischer explained that 'the 3 -foot encroachment triggered the need for a variance which will be heard by the,Zoning Board of Appeals. Commissioner Carpenter questioned Mr. Thomas if room(s) could be removed from the memory care facility to eliminate the need for the 3 -foot variance. Mr. Thomas directed-J. Kaiser, to respond to that question. Ms. Kaiser told the Commission memory,care requires a staffing model, adding it has been found that the model that works best is between 14 and 15 units, removing 3 -feet would be difficult and would compromise the interior needs of a memory floor. Commissioner Carpenter questioned if there will be a continuum of care between 7500 York residents and Ebenezer. Mr. Thomas explained that 7500 York residents will have priority plus they will be able to "hire" services from the PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 6 of 8 assisted living building /Ebenezer. Mr. Thomas added he believes there will be cross -over care especially for physical therapy. A discussion ensued with Commissioners questioning the hardship to support the 3 -foot variance but acknowledging that the Zoning Board of Appeals will review and act on the variance. Commissioners also expressed their support for the project, adding it will be a good addition to the City Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. Public Comment Donna Sundt, 7500 York Avenue, #621 informed the'Commission she resides on the north side of the building and after the assisted living building is constructed she will be looking into a building and not the green space she enjoys today. Ms. Sundt suggested that the building be re- located'to,the northeast side of the building, not the present site. Ms. Sundt asked the Commission to have the new building relocated. Russ Helgesen, 7500 York Avenue acknowledged that the proposed building will impact some of the residents; however he pointed,.out a new building would always impact someone. Mr. Helgesen noted the majority of the residents at 7500 York voted for this location, pointing out it was very important to the majority of residents to retain the garden area on the northeast side of the site. Judy Smith, 7420 Edinborough Way asked to have the access clarified. Ms. Smith was informed access remains the same. M's. Smith added it also appeared to her that a well was being drilled before final approval was granted. Mr. Thomas explained a well was not being drilled they were drilling to find out if the buildings heat source could be,geo thermal. Bob Grueman, Fairview Southdale Hospital Administration told the Commission Fairview Southdale lends their support to the project, adding he believes the proposed assisted living facility not only benefits the residents of 7500 York but all of Edina. Mr. Grueman urged the Commission to support the request as proposed. Pat Thompson, 7420 Edinborough Way, stated she believes the proposal will ruin her view and will add more traffic to an already congested area. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place commented that his mind was also on traffic. Mr. Bohan pointed out that presently it is difficult to navigate York and Parklawn Avenues, especially during rush hour. Commissioner Schroeder moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 7 of 8 Chair Fischer asked the applicant to comment on traffic. Mr. Ed Tehar informed the Commission that basically this type of facility generates very low traffic volumes. The increase in traffic was calculated and found to be acceptable at all intersections with no rating change. Commissioner Forrest questioned traffic at the delivery entrance. Ms. Kaiser responded that there will be two food deliveries per week, and the delivery entrance will also be used as the source to move in and out of th facility. Concluding, Ms. Kaiser said smaller deliveries/could also occur at this entrance or the front entrance. Commission Action Commissioner Staunton stated he supports the.Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, adding it's a good project. Commissioner Staunton moved Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion.: Commissioner Risser said she was heartened to hear that the applicant was pursuing the possibility of geo thermal heating. Commissioner Risser said a sustainable building is good not only for the; residents, but for the City as well. Commissioner Grabiel pointed out this project received preliminary approval from both the Commission and the Council. At the time of preliminary approval the only "unknown" -was if the residents supported the project. Since that time the residents of 7500 have voted in favor of the project which speaks a great deal toward, the proposal and why it should be approved. Commissioner Grabiel stated he has no problem supporting the project as presented - it's a great project and good for the City of Edina, concluding it should be approved. 'Chair Fischer called for the vote. carried. All voted aye; motion for approval Chair Fischer asked the Commission if they have any thoughts on the variances. Commissioner Grabiel said with respect to the variances there is a point in fact that should be remembered; there is a variance process, and that in itself means something. Commissioner Grabiel stated he supports the variances; pointing out testimony was given by those with experience that the number of memory care units meets a model that works. The design of a memory care floor is different because it has to take into account the special needs of those with Alzheimer's. The need for a secure entrance is extremely important and can't be negotiated. Concluding, Commissioner Grabiel said the impact of the 3 -foot variance is minor PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 8 of 8 and the square footage variance is the result of the zoning. Commissioner Grabiel reiterated that he supports the project - Commissioner Brown commented that he struggles a bit with hardship; however, he pointed out he isn't familiar with the staffing needs of an assisted living /memory care facility and doesn't what to dictate to the professionals how they run their business. Commissioner Scherer said in her opinion there must be ways to eliminate the. three feet without much change to the floor plan. Commissioner Forrest said in her opinion there is a concern with the 3 -foot variance because it's at the buildings full height. Commissioner Staunton encouraged the applicant to build their case to better explain their hardship to the Zoning Board of Appeals: Commissioner Staunton said there is a story to tell, especially about not being able.to slide the building east or west. The other half of the variance deals with unit size and that requirement was stipulated by code. Reiterating, Commissioner,Staunton encouraged the applicant to build their case to support the requested variances. DRAFT MINUTES ZB JUNE 412009 B -09 -6 Ebenezer Society /7500 York Co -op 7500 York Avenue, Edina, MN Request: A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units, and a three -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way Planner Presentation Planner Teague told the Board the applicant is proposingJo build a 76 -unit, 4 -story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9 -story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. This proposed project has received Preliminary Approval by the City Council, per Planning Commission recommendation. Planner Teague explained that staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable for this site. In regard to the setback variance, the hardship is caused by the existing location of the underground parking garage. This structure was not built to support the weight of a four -story addition above it. Therefore, the applicant is forced to develop a.site plan by-working around this structure. The applicant also does not wish to 'disturb the open space and.garden area along York Avenue. The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building, and the height of buildings in the area. The density of the project allowed by City Code would be 44 units per acre. The applicant is proposing a -density of 36 units. Therefore, staff believes the proposed building is reasonably sized, and a reasonable request, given the practical difficulty of having to design a building around the underground parking ramp. The layout of this wing is driven by the Alzheimer's floor The rooms are very small. To take three feet off any of the rooms would not be practical given the needs within the facility. The requested variance would be a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two- bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. The maximum standards were developed to ensure affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential districts. The existing and proposed units within the Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes June 4, 2009 Page 2 of 7 7500 development were and are not intended to be entirely for affordable housing. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). Ten two- bedroom units and seven one - bedroom units would exceed the maximum requirement. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the following variances: 1. A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units. 2. A three -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way. based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the location of the existing underground parking deck, which would not support the proposed addition. In addition, the proposed building location avoids the large open space and garden, area along York Avenue. Therefore, the applicant is forced to develop a site plan by working around this structure and the open space. 2. The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building, and the height of buildings in the area. The density of the project allowed by City Code would be 44 units per acre: The applicant is proposing a density of 36 units. Therefore, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and a reasonable request, given the practical difficulty of having to design a building around the underground parking ramp. 3. The building layout of the area where the variance is requested was driven by the Alzheimer's floor. The rooms are very small. To take three feet off any of the rooms would not be practical given the needs within the facility. 4. The setback variance is for a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback. 5. The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two - bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. 6. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. 7. The intent of the maximum square footage standards was to ensure some affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential Districts. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes June 4, 2009 Page 3 of 7 Approval is also based on the following conditions: • Compliance with the conditions required by the City Council for the Final Development Plan required with the proposal. • The variance will expire on June 5, 2010, unless the city has issued a building permit for the project covered by this variance or approved a time extension. Appearing for Applicant Ward Issacson, Pope Associates Inc. Susan Farr and J. Kaiser, Ebenezer Society. 1 Applicant Presentation Mr. Issacson gave a power point presentation and explained that it was difficult designing a new building without encroaching onto the existing underground parking garage. Mr. Issacson explained they really - 'squeezed" the memory care element of the building to ensure minimal,impact" Continuing, Mr. Issacson said the memory care floor guides the project. The corridor and entry can't be moved and because of the nature of the residents the entrance must be "hidden ". Lobby areas are also needed at the ends of the hallway. Alzheimer residents tend to wander and encountering�dead ends can be difficult for them. Concluding Mr. Issacson said he is available for questions from the Board. Comments and Questions from the Board Member Vasaly asked Mr. Issacson why 2 -units can't be removed from the memory care floor. Mr. lssacso'n responded that a memory floor /facility has a care model based on staffing needs. The usual memory care facility is between 14 and 15 units. Mr. Issacson pointed out that although a variance is required from Edinborough Way a parking lot is located across the street from the proposed building,, minimizing impact. Mr. Issacson also pointed out that the narrowest portion of the,building requires the variance from Edinborough Way. Chair Fischer asked Mr. Issacson if building height could be reduced. He pointed out the height of the building really drives the variance. Mr. Issacson responded that the roof of the building could be flat; however, a flat roof doesn't create a very residential "feel ". Member Davidson commented if the proposed mansard roof is eliminated and replaced with a flat roof no variance would be needed. Member Davidson said he acknowledges the preference for a more "residential feel" to the building, but the Zoning Board does not consider aesthetics. Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes June 4, 2009 Page 4 of 7 Member Hornig asked Mr. Teague if the parking garage could be considered a self- imposed hardship. Planner Teague responded in his opinion it is not a self imposed hardship. The parking deck dictates building placement, adding the parking deck wasn't constructed to be able to support the weight of another structure. Member Hornig said she agrees, the hardship is not self imposed. Member Davidson suggested that the applicant take a different approach and reduce each memory care unit by 5 inches. Mr. Issacson responded that in dealing with a memory care facility it just isn't that easy. Mr. Issacson explained what they are doing is lining up the proposed building with the edge of the existing parking deck and working from that. Mr. Issacson introduced J. Kaiser and asked her to speak to the questions Board Members raised about spacing requirements for memory care residents. Ms. Kaiser addressed the Board and explained ,not only is she speaking for the applicant but she is speaking for the future residents of the memory care floor. Ms. Kaiser pointed out that additional space is needed in each living unit to accommodate wheelchairs and walkers. On top of those special spacing needs memory care residents tend to like to wander and they also try to find a "way out ". This creates the need for the main lobby and entry way to be designed in a serpentine fashion. Memory care facilities cannot be built with an "easy way out" so taking off inches here or there greatly impacts the resident's safety. Ms. Kaiser pointed out as previously mentioned the memory care floor also has a lobby positioned at each end of the hallway. These lobbies provide a safe turn around without compromising the privacy of those who may live at the ends of the hall. Continuing, Ms. Kaiser explained the memory care model also includes such things as a laundry"area. She pointed out because of the vulnerability of the residents on a memory care floor space needs to be provided for a laundry room. Staff cannot go to another floor to retrieve laundry — memory care residents can't be left alone. Continuing Ms. Kaiser added each memory care floor needs its own dining area and an area where a resident can find quiet. Ms. Kaiser said the staff ratio for memory care is 1 -8, adding staffing must be planned for very carefully. Member Staunton commented that if the staffing ratio is 1 -8 why not 16 units. Ms. Kaiser responded that they do not want the common areas compromised to achieve another unit. Each foot on a memory care floor is accounted for. Susan Farr told the Board another point they need to consider besides the hardship imposed by the underground parking garage is that the residents of 7500 York have a very definite opinion on what type of building they want. 7500 York is home to a number of architects who during the months prior to submittal of the application routinely expressed their opinions. Ms. Farr said 15 renderings were submitted to the review board before the current plan was approved to more forward through the city approval processes. Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes June 4, 2009 Page 5 of 7 Member Davidson pointed out that 7500 York has a flat roof. Ms. Farr acknowledged that point; adding 7500 York is also 9 -story building and many of the residents don't like the flat roof. Member Davidson asked Planner Teague why there is a cap on square footage in the PSR zoning district. Planner Teague responded the square footage cap was implemented to ensure affordable housing for seniors. Chair Fischer commented in looking back on the history of the Zoning Ordinance many of the ordinances were written to be project specific. Member Hornig stated in her opinion what isn't being considered is that there is a hardship in constructing this type of building; it's more of a use hardship. Member Hornig pointed out this building isn't just an apartment building it is a special purpose building with completely different requirements and many of those requirements must be met because of building codes and ADA requirements. Member Hornig said it appears to her that the applicant was very aware of code when designing the building'and did everything, possible to mitigate the variances. Member Hornig said it appears to her for this very specific use that keeping the 3 -feet is a big -deal. It isn't as easy as knocking off inches or eliminating units. Every square inch;appears to have been accounted for and is needed to run an efficient safe living care facility, and approving this variance meets the spirit and intent of the code. Ms. Kaiser said that another, point to be considered is that the memory care floor is on the first floor, establishing the footprint. The reason for locating memory care on the first floor is to provide a safe outdoor area for the memory care residents. Ms. Kaiser said if units are removed on the first floor it would follow suit that th6 loss would,go all the way up. i Mr. Gfuemari, Fairview Southidale Hospital urged the Board to approve the requested'variances. \ , David Pyles, attorney representing 7500 York told Board Members that the building design before them this evening is what the residents of 7500 want. He stated the hardship is real; the parking deck does compromise building placement.. Mr. Pyles stressed the residents of 7500 York want the new assisted living /memory , care building to be residential in flavor and have a pitched or Mansard roof. Residents do not support a flat roof - period. Chair Fischer asked if there was anyone in the audience that would like to speak to the project. No one was present. Member Vasaly said she would like to make an observation. She stated in her opinion this is a very sensible project; however the Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes June 4, 2009 Page 6 of 7 shouldn't have to hear the variance requests. It should have been handled as a PUD at the Commission and Council level. A discussion ensued with Board Members acknowledging the difficulty in the variance requests, noting that rezoning the site actually created the need for the unit square footage variance. Board Members decided to separate the variances and vote up or down on each one. Member Staunton moved to have two separate motions. Member Hornig seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Member Staunton moved approval of a 3 -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions noting the following: 1. The distance between the 3 -foot encroachment to the nearest neighbor (parking lot) is ample, 100+ feet; 2. The height of the building drives the variance and the building height at 4- stories is reasonable; 3. The existing underground parking ramp /deck drives the placement of the proposed building — this is a hardship not self imposed; 4. The needs of memory care residents on the first floor drive the interior configuration and manipulating the interior to eliminate the variance would create obstacles and safety issues for those residents. Member Hornig seconded the motion. Member Davidson stated he opposes the variance, adding all points presented are valid but the mansard roof could be a flat roof. Ayes; Staunton, Hornig, Fischer. Nays; Vasaly and Davidson. Motion carried. A 3 -foot setback from Edinborough Way approved 3 -2. Member Staunton moved to deny the maximum square footage variance, noting it can't be enforced and the code needs to be amended. Member Hornig seconded the motion. Member Hornig questioned why a "bad" ordinance can't be considered a hardship. Continuing, Member Hornig said she finds it distasteful that seniors are discriminated against by capping the square footage they are allowed to live in. Member Hornig added she is in complete support of affordable housing, adding everything must be done to add and retain affordable housing in Edina; however, in her opinion both affordable and market rate /luxury units can co- exist. Concluding, Member Hornig applauded the City's stand on providing affordable Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes June 4, 2009 Page 7of7 housing, but not at the expense of capping the unit size for seniors. It's discriminatory. Ayes; Staunton, Vasaly. Nays; Hornig, Davidson and Fischer. Motion failed 3 -2. Member Davidson moved approval of the maximum,per unit square footage requirement for 17 -units based on staff findings and `subject to staff conditions. Member Hornig seconded the motion.; Ayes-; ; Davidson, Hornig and Fischer. Nays; Staunton and Vasaly. Motion for, approval carried 3 -2. A discussion ensued with Board Members wondering ifthe,square footage of all the units were calculated and averaged would the proposed building meet code: Planner Teague said that is an interesting point „adding he will run those calculations. Chair Fischer reported that this proposal will now be forwarded to the City Council for their review and action. i i l r \\ i IN)) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 4, 2009 B -09 -06 Planning Director Brief Description: A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units, and a three -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way for the Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative. Recommended Action: Approve the variances as requested. Introduction /Background The applicant is proposing to build a 76 -unit, 4 -story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9 -story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. (See project location on pages Al —A3.) This proposed project has received Preliminary Approval by the City Council, per Planning Commission recommendation. (See Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages Al 1 —A20.) Primary Issue Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F., of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests. 1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable for this site. In regard to the setback variance, the hardship is caused by the existing location of the underground parking garage. This structure was not built to support the weight of a four -story addition above it. Therefore, the applicant is forced to develop a site plan by working around this structure. The applicant also does not wish to disturb the open space and garden area along York Avenue. The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building, and the height of buildings in the area. The density of the project allowed by City Code would be 44 units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 36 units. Therefore, staff believes the proposed building is reasonably sized, and a reasonable request, given the practical difficulty of having to design a building around the underground parking ramp. The layout of this wing is driven by the Alzheimer's floor. (See page A9a.) The rooms are very small. To take three feet off any of the rooms would not be practical given the needs within the facility. The requested variance would be a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback. (See page A9.) The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two- bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. The maximum standards were developed to ensure affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential districts. The existing and proposed units within the 7500 development were and are not intended to be entirely for affordable housing. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). Ten two- bedroom units and seven one - bedroom units would exceed the maximum requirement. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is that this site exists with senior housing, and does not conform to the maximum standards for senior housing, and an underground parking deck that cannot support an addition above it. 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed four -story addition would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are several buildings in the immediate area that are taller and have greater densities than the proposed development. (See page A10.) The subject property contains a 9 -story building. The three -foot encroachment into the required setback would not be noticeable in the neighborhood. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: CommonBond Multi- family residential; zoned and guided for high density residential. Easterly: Yorkdale townhomes; zoned and guided medium density housing. Southerly: Edinborough condos; zoned and guided high- density housing. Westerly: Multi- family residential; zoned and guided mixed use Existing Site Features The subject property is 11.6 acres in size and contains a nine -story senior housing building. (See page A3.) The existing facility is a housing cooperative, and was the first senior housing cooperative in the United States. Planning Guide Plan designation: High Density Residential Zoning: PRD -4, Planned Residential District Recommendation Approve the following variances: A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units. 2. A three -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way. Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the location of the existing underground parking deck, which would not support the proposed addition. In addition, the proposed building location avoids the large open space and garden area along York Avenue. Therefore; the applicant is forced to develop a site plan by working around this structure and the open space. 2. The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building, and the height of buildings in the area. The density of the project allowed by City Code would be 44 units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 36 units. Therefore, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and a reasonable request, given the practical difficulty of having to design a building around the underground parking ramp. 3. The building layout of the area where the variance is requested was driven by the Alzheimer's floor. The rooms are very small. To take three feet off any of the rooms would not be practical given the needs within the facility. 4. The setback variance is for a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback. 5. The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two- bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. 6. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. 7. The intent of the maximum square footage standards was to ensure some affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential Districts. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). Approval is based on the following conditions: Compliance with.the conditions required by the City Council for the Final Development Plan required with the proposal. 2. The variance will expire on June 5, 2010, unless the city has issued a building permit for the project covered by this variance or approved a time extension. rD7 Laae nd TC 1DD0 7110 ?387 �I' Hoa Naml7r Labals v a.t�ull► 3447 Street Name LzbO. 7,1217/201 3655 3375 7128 1177 TI , 7151 �i CJty Lim)ts 71257174 I 7,/ Grooks 129 7128 _ _ El LeL•e kamee 207 24 Jr 0 0 r L�I:es 7205 0 -272°8 \ 7,200 / 7201 P.rkc Pprccis 7302 7235 1141 7250 1f J1 / L_ -2: 0,4117157 �412d5T 21 +ONiff53'B 10 . 0 n :1111 Y7,8,07, 714 3821 ��IL 5602 }7C� ! 335 +oon -15 C;! 7' BJL 904 iDb S d 0 7355 9=a blroi 513 7,38,0 8D0 9p1��5p] p'n 24 e.D1' 7390 7373 1',7I2!9 SOJ 315 04017600 74 57404 40" 7400 JD3' 2C 3100 7000 y W 74057408 7413 7412 s 7450 0 24 7401 { 0 1741] 743 3955 ti - � 7407 I2! 7500 2< p 7506 1 I o ° 0 7,508, I 7St1 0100 000 '550 7501 i 7576 1 7520 24 7600' J2C5 0 p 3209 76011 4 %77, - 7600 16P5 I 36D/ 7,608,• 7612 0 7616 0 7701 i52c 7657 ww..W Y 7650 0 7624' 0 7700 7730 C 7701 ° ti�L449 [7041 77091 770D � '�f JJDD 360 It 3400 7770 2< PLLJ. 3602324.710367 Fd- 34-01 Parkda«n Aire Edina, MH 55435 � ,gT-DL"..L+ir •/ ,III, AL 703 T t ! 10DU 7107 OP •� S r+RIM ; �' �rnro r, 24 }• _l (� 60C ;,C7 '� . jf 4G4 •1 . 804 . trU3 4 (r2 : 13 f 800 901' aGP :.pu {4 �. 117 215 109 105 201 r 7401 7400 = ' iM t(2 rre '' 3400' �y ` • i . 7405 7404 7405 7406 7j1? 7012 arr- 7415 7430. 7529 7 434 7433 U., E e :407 r Y; SD4 7504 D f.. r,'Iff1 I t `: P 7517 7516 1. Id- g ti•r � {� _ _ - :'571" —_ �_- ._. a .__�.. _ 1,.;. `,, f' d n ;'612 �f dp` ap 7616 t 762! 7700 24 ~ . .. r _ r,;��c.n RdltS• =:I^tn ICI LO"+S dS ])S � •.. .: �- - +c:x:._..:. - ... .. .. .. - - BACKGROUND 7500 York Cooperative, developed in 1978, was the first senior housing cooperative model in the United States. There are 337 units at 7500 York. The structure is member - owned and is governed through vast committees. Its mission statement is to provide a safe, healthy and pleasant home for its members to enjoy an active, independent lifestyle in a senior cooperative environment. The Cooperative has been guided and managed by Ebenezer since its inception in 1978. Ebenezer has been a provider of compassionate, community- centered care for older adults and others in need for over 90 years. They offer a full range of coordinated programs and services including senior housing, assisted living, memory care, transitional and long -term care, adult and intergenerational programs and a variety of community -based services throughout the state of Minnesota and one facility in Iowa. EXPLANATION OF PROJECT The shareholders at 7500 York Cooperative approached Ebenezer with a request for help in their aging in place needs at the cooperative. Over the years, shareholders have developed close friendships with their neighbors by their active participation in resident run activities. As the. members age, some have had to move to assisted living and some into more skilled care facilities. The figures show that over the last few years there has been between 25 — 40 members leaving per year to move into assisted living, long term care and other housing because of health related care issues. The trend will continue to see 35 to 40 move outs per year for these reasons. It is hard for the existing shareholders to keep in touch and to visit their family members and friends who have had to move. There also are shareholders who are still living at 7500 York that could benefit from a facility with more care, but are reluctant to leave their friends and family. An answer to some of these aging in place issues is to build on to 7500 York Cooperative and add an Assisted Living, memory and elder care suite model. The model plan would have 76 units which would include 47 units of assisted living, 16 units of Memory care and 13 elder care suites. This is the first cooperative in the state of Mimnesota that is requesting this vision to create a continuum of care for seniors in cooperative housing. All areas of life could benefit by this need. Currently, there are 500 people on the waiting list to move into 7500 York Cooperative, many of which are aging in their single family homes within the community. By establishing the assisted living building there will be options available for the current shareholders to move into. This would free up cooperative shares for those on the waiting list and thereby increase availability of existing single family housing within the city of Edina. The cooperative shareholders as well as Ebenezer are both conunitted to building an eco- friendly and sustainable addition to help create this continuum of care for older adults as they age at 7500 York. They want to work to include advance technological and green solutions to keep up with future building and senior care needs, while being respectful to the environment. MA EXPLANATION OF REQUEST- VARIANCE OF THE MAXIMUM ALLOWANCE OF UNIT SIZE IN A PSR -4 ZONE. Ebenezer has requested to rezone 7500 York from a PRD to a PSR to comply with the number of enclosed and exposed parking spaces per dwelling unit that is required. However, under the Edina City Code, a PSR building is restricted as to unit size. The code has two maximum square foot criteria for one bedroom units. At one place in the code it states that the maximum square footage fora one bedroom unit must not exceed 650 square feet. Another place in the code it states that a one bedroom unit may not exceed 700 square feet. The square footage for 7500 York's one bedroom units range from a minimum of 775 square feet to a maximum of 925 square feet. The Edina City Code specifies that a two bedroom unit in a PSR may not exceed 850 square feet. 7500 York's two bedroom units range in size from 1,020 square feet to 1,260 square feet: Therefore, this variance application is to ask that the square footages of the existing units be accepted under the planned senior resident zoning and allow for the assisted living, memory and elder care suite model plan to move forward in building.' VIEW OF ENTRY FROM SOUTH - 7500 YORK NORTH TOWER PROJECT 7500 York Assisted Living Edina, Minnesota 04.27 -09 1 COMMISSION 421252.07142 �QR 1 a FT= r7l VIEW OF ENTRY FROM WEST - EDINBOROUGH WAY AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTH PROJECT 7500 York Assisted Living Edina, Minnesota 04.23.09 1 COMMISSION 421252.0 1142 ]u �pmmn a - -- VIEW OF MAIN ENTRY( FROM PARKLAWN AVENUE L---------------------------------------------- - - - -•\ r X - - - - - - - -- M. 0 1� "Op r. IFFEmB70.67 EXISTING LFE-855-02 % 7L E: It 7-7 - - - - - - - `----------- .--- . - - - - -_ F i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. RZ .. 1:17 IW_ MD V D 7., 3 A " r�ltj�� :A, -F-7 M A)I�k � P (-,4 � 7500 Y01 ASSISTED LIVIt EOINA. KIINNFSC FIRM PAVING,01) GEOMEFIUCFLAN C4.0 D W Q >Z Y Q WAP 4 -00 LNL - y.y CO1DiRCaaN L14�e = —p�, � •� - t '•i+- � ! • 4} � - _ 7- fir sri • � _r ______ __ _________ -. —LW OP Fsle0nETE N 01aATE . i�ltllilNh . ''�° r z a � mcmax • .� I �'. ��m�� Pl1LONTDP6 omtwemrnra: �- . -.i � •.g y..l '• 0101'mT- .e•C.e'.e'. e't. E6TALL8 At .� '•0.4�' . I \'I .PfTrR A. ds • I A ra+cmtte tNa A. ee,e�� mux ... ewwtr p •ef£ dAU ' . FAN E1 - -J ° ° -- u MORT CAPE .eff LANDO v'e - - -� eLOG Urour P T NEW 9 & 4 STORY ASSISTED LIVING BUILDING I I 16d, DEUvwr AF FA WRFFCD- I nn I �y A1A it .ter r 1 nt -M cm g� b•y :. e.e• 1 'lhIM7aID A — — — — — — � -W y I ^ mai �� ,/� e'm' y § DgIYt}lAT 9 TTP. AN RAao U�\/ 6 \_ET A a -N�nw �GVL 4 PARPOSTALL8 4 I L 7P0 PAeLftl 6l10dO1C CaN: iWR 1' 10-0' PAFK!!ta OEI9AOC 1� CRL � - �j UWAR S� ojy�J'+F%v a cam w osm an � .. aEa an . ml , -3y hay aT 4• EDINBOROUGH WAY ENLARGED SITE PLAN t. 1 " =20' -0" ° 'Or NORTH FINAL DEVELO APPLICATI NOT FOI CONSTRUC 4/24/09 ENLARGE I® of WOW: a P I��TON Ssaia6. Orm h pa" 1�P Ale ..Rµ•4- , . �. � 56 • I A ra+cmtte tNa A. ee,e�� mux ... ewwtr p •ef£ dAU ' . FAN E1 - -J ° ° -- u MORT CAPE .eff LANDO v'e - - -� eLOG Urour P T NEW 9 & 4 STORY ASSISTED LIVING BUILDING I I 16d, DEUvwr AF FA WRFFCD- I nn I �y A1A it .ter r 1 nt -M cm g� b•y :. e.e• 1 'lhIM7aID A — — — — — — � -W y I ^ mai �� ,/� e'm' y § DgIYt}lAT 9 TTP. AN RAao U�\/ 6 \_ET A a -N�nw �GVL 4 PARPOSTALL8 4 I L 7P0 PAeLftl 6l10dO1C CaN: iWR 1' 10-0' PAFK!!ta OEI9AOC 1� CRL � - �j UWAR S� ojy�J'+F%v a cam w osm an � .. aEa an . ml , -3y hay aT 4• EDINBOROUGH WAY ENLARGED SITE PLAN t. 1 " =20' -0" ° 'Or NORTH FINAL DEVELO APPLICATI NOT FOI CONSTRUC 4/24/09 ENLARGE I® of WOW: a P I��TON Ssaia6. Orm h pa" 1�P Ale _g �� `i' rmre. NA lftAA C a.rm.. nnae Ran .� oA. o PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN m w•..,..,_.......,..�o.. X. anr.ro Q ; - - - -- - - -- - s` - k4 - �, I FIRST FLOOR PLAN 29,078 S.F. LZE 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EOPIA MINNESOTA II CONSTRUCTION I FIRST FLOOR PLAN 'JMJI A2.3 r- &l. SECOND FLOOR PLAN 23,115S.I9 S.F. 3r32'l'4r M7 APR 2 4 1 ,THIRD FLOOR PLAN 23,115 S.F. W71E� i0i (ttAfN'G 4dRNT, iLP]M RAID NE 01 r F� O AFR q 4 2553 0 � ''." 7500 YORK �� ASSISTED LIVING EDWA MINNESOTA FIWLL OEVELOPI�NP IIPPLIGTION � NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THIRD FLOOR PLAN A2.5 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 17.892 S.F. NpfEI R7R (RpPMIL (,LAMTT, M7R PINS 0(E PR4.N AT A WA .Fria �,rr ,Lrr.O p�R 2 d 2809 0 T 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EOINI, MINNESOTA r VELOPMFM� IGTION T FOR RUCIION 4108 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN A2.6 r] w BOOM Iry *AKT -DwAj To vi pj M4 F0 L9. ) pu cc�.iu iA-cNS.Cq*+4e SCI LO= C' 2D]5 -•- � 7G ;31t ( U U BTS PER PrC &0 Draft Minute Summary of PC Meeting November 259 2008 2005.0017.08 Rezoning, Final Development Plan, Lot Division /Final Plat and Variances Ebenezer Society /7500 York Cooperative 7500 York Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative are proposing to build a 76 -unit, 4 -story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9 -story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. Of the 76 units, 47 units would be for assisted living, 16 would be of memory care and 13 elder care suites. Access to the site would be off Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. Parking would be provided underground, and within a small surface lot off Parklawn Avenue. Planner Teague explained the proposal before the Planning Commission is a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary : Rezoning, and uultimately, the proposal would require all of the following: 1. Final Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District to PSR -4, to Planned Senior Development District, 2. Final Development Plan. 3. Variances. A maximum square footage variance for 14 dwelling units. A 3 -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way. 4. Lot Division /Final Plat. The site exists as two lots today. The lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. Planner Teague continued and asked the Commission to note in order to obtain the above- mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step . process. That process is as follows: 1. Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning. Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning is a review by the Planning Commission and City Council, in which approval simply allows the applicant to prepare a Final Development Plan. Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan requires a three -fifths vote of the City Council, but does not guarantee approval of the Rezoning, or Final Development Plan. 2. Final Development Plan and Rezoning. The Final Development Plan process is generally the same as the Preliminary Development Plan. A three -fifths favorable vote of the City Council is again required. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends approval based on the following findings: 1. The proposed addition is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. 111 2. The proposed density is compatible with densities in the area. 3. Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing is a need in the City. 4. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan -must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 30, 2008. 2. Sustainable design. Final Development Plans must include the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A5a —A5c of the staff report. 3. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. Appearing for Applicant Mark Thomas, Ebenezer, Russ Helgeson, 7500 York Avenue resident, Ward Isaacson, Pope Architects, and Charles Bassford, Notary Public. Commission Comments /Questions Commissioner Grabiel questioned the reasoning behind the "cap" for allowed unit square footage in the PSR zoning district. Planner Teague responded the "cap" on square footage is to ensure affordable housing. Applicant Presentation Mr. Thomas addressed the Commission and explained the history of Ebenezer Society and their outreach into the community. Mr. Thomas said Ebenezer currently serves 3,000 seniors and the 7500 York Co -op has a waiting list of up to 10 years. The average age at 7500 York is 84 years. Russ Helgeson told the Commission as a resident of 7500 York he has had to watch many of his friends leave their home at 7500 York when the need arose to transition to an assisted living facility, adding if this request is approved that would no longer be an issue. Mr. Helgeson said in his opinion if approved this proposal would be a benefit, not only for residents of 7500 York, but to the community at large. Continuing, Mr. Helgeson said the new building and additional landscaping will actually enhance the property. Mr..Helgeson asked the Commission to also note that many people who are interested in being placed on the wait list for 7500 York also ask if an assisted living component is offered. Concluding, Mr. Helgeson noted if this request were approved 7500 York would be more.competitive. Mr. Isaacson presented to the Commission a slide show highlighting features of the proposed building. He explained that Ebernezer /7500 York Co -Op is proposing to construct 76 new units with a breakdown of 47 assisted living units, 16 memory care units and 13 elder care suites. Mr. Isaacson noted 7.500 York is /l i a 2 the first co -op in the State requesting approval to create a continuum of care for seniors in a cooperative housing setting. Commission Comments Commissioners referred to letters received from residents expressing concern over loosing their green space (if this project were approved) and noted if surface parking were reduced more green space could be retained. Commissioners raised the following issues: Will the new assisted living facility be part of the 7500 Co -Op ® Will residents at 7500 York receive preferential treatment if the need arises for a resident to move into assisted living. quarters Who advanced this request Mr. Helgeson responded that the proposed assisted living building would function independently from the Co -Op. Mr. Helgeson said at this time details are still being worked out on the flow between buildings, land lease, legal description, etc. Mr. Bassford explained Ebenezer Society has requested an overall development plan to construct an assisted living facility at 7500 York. 7500 York residents would have to vote on the request. At this time the land use designation for 7500 York is PRD, and a rezoning of.the entire site to PSR is also being requested by the Board at 7500 York. Mr. Bassford stated in discussions with city staff a PSR zoning was found to be more compatible with the use of this site as a senior building and if approved, assisted living building. The rezoning would also bring the parking requirements into conformance with city code. Concluding, Mr. Bassford pointed out if rezoned a maximum unit square footage variance would be required. Public Comment Bruce Holman, 7240 Edinborough Way pointed out that this proposal also `impacts nearby Edina residents that don't reside at 7500 York. Mr. Holman said in his opinion the proposed building is set too close to Edinborough Way. Mr. Holman said he is also concerned about his view being blocked and construction noise. Concluding, Mr. Holman asked the Commission to keep in mind that the YMCA is also interested in constructing residential units on its site, adding the increased density in the immediate area is getting to be too much. Bob Jarvis, 7500 York Avenue #117 told the Commission he is in favor of the proposal as submitted. He told the Commission the average age of residents in the 7500 building is 84 years old, adding if approved,.the proposed assisted living component would keep 7500 viable, and the. next step many present 7500 residents could use. Mark Johnson, 7500 York Avenue #438, stated he moved to 7500 York a year ago and disagrees with the proposal presented this evening. Mr. Johnson said A(3 3 many 7500 residents will not speak up, but he knows many residents are worried about the noise this will generate, loss of green space and obstructed views-. Mr. Johnson said he would like to see the age of residents permitted to "buy" into 7500 York lowered. Gemma Hessian, 7500 York Avenue, told the Commission she recently fell and realized how quickly things could change, adding if the assisted living component was part of the 7500 community she could recuperate and have physical therapy without leaving her community. Miss Hessian stated she supports the proposal as presented. Rob Grauman, Fairview Southdale Hospital told the Commission he supports the project. He added it is important to be able to transition from one type of housing into another as easily as possible. Commissioner Grablel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Comments A discussion ensued with Commissioners indicating that on the whole they support the project as presented. Commissioners acknowledged the Zoning Board will act on the variances requested; with Commissioners indicating their support for those variances. Commission Action Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development. Plan approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Aye's; Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest. Abstain: Lonsbury. Motion carried. Further Commission Discussion 'Commissioners indicated in the future they would consider further discussion, at the Commission level, on discussing amending city code unit square footage - requirements in the PSR zoning district. Commissioners also asked the proponent to reconsider adding a green roof, pointing out it may not be as difficult or as expensive as first thought. Commissioners also requested that if approved that the builder be respectful to all neighbors during the construction phase. 12/1/2005 submitted El Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 11 7) Compli a with all conditio listed by the City Engineer in his memo dated October 24, 2008. 8) The property o r mu enter into a Skyway Agreement with the City of Edina to connect the second walkway to the parking ramp. Cost of the connection would be the responsibility of h roperty owner of 3930 491/2 Street West. The Skyway Agreement was sub' ct to ap val of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Member Bennett seconde a motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Hous , Masica, Swenson, Ho d Motion carried. REZONING — EBENEZER SOCIETY ON BEHALF OF 7500 YORK AVENUE COOPERATIVE — RESOLUTION NO. 2008-127 APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Mr. Teague described the location of the subject site on York Avenue and displayed a picture of the existing nine -story, 337 -unit senior cooperative building. The Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the Cooperative, had made the application to build a 76 -unit addition to the existing building. He displayed pictures depicting the underground parking garage and proposed four -story structure comprised of 47 assisted care units, 16 memory care units, and 13 elder care suites with underground parking and a small surface lot. The request before the Council was for the preliminary development plan and preliminary rezoning which was a two -step process. Mr. Teague said, if approved, application would be made for the final development plan and final rezoning from PRD -4 Planned Residential District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Development District. The property was currently zoned for an all -age facility, not strictly for senior housing. If given preliminary approval, application would also be made and reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals for a maximum square footage variance for 14 dwelling units and a three -foot setback variance for the building from Edinborough Way. He added presently the site existed as two lots so the lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. Mr. Teague advised that the traffic study conducted by Wenck Associates indicated the existing roadway system was adequate to handle the 234 trips per day that would be generated. The Transportation Commission reviewed that study and recommended approval. He reviewed the parking calculation and advised that the proposal was well within the senior housing requirements. Mr. Teague described the landscaping plan, noting a number of trees would be removed as a result of the addition but would still exceed the City's requirement. On density, a maximum of 44 dwelling units per acre was allowed and the proposal was for 36 units per acre and consistent with densities in the area. The primary issues were whether the proposed use and rezoning were reasonable for this site. Staff felt the use was compatible with surrounding uses, densities were consistent, amenities were in this proximity, and sustainable design was being proposed. Traffic would be supported by existing roads and the assisted living units would provide an opportunity for continuum of care. He noted the addition of senior housing may provide an opportunity for seniors that live in single - family homes to move to this facility and open the home for a younger family to move to Edina. Staff and the Planning Commission agreed that PSR-4 was an appropriate zoning district and the variances were justified due to the hardship caused by the existing underground parking garage. They also felt the unit size was reasonable but did recommend the City further study the question of whether or not the existing cap on the unit size of senior housing should be retained. On November 28, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report. The Planning Commission further recommended that the Council authorize them to examine and consider a zoning ordinance amendment regarding the maximum square footage requirements in the PSR zoning district. The Council discussion included: surface parking would be located on top of the existing underground garage to preserve open space and gardens located on the northeast side; 465 parking stalls were provided in the site plan; if this property was rezoned, most of the units at 7500 York would become A(5- 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 11 nonconforming due to their size; and, a direct vote of the 7500 York Cooperative owners was required to approve this project. Charles Bassford, attorney representing the 7500 York Cooperative, stated the vote of the Cooperative had not yet been held but when taken, each unit would get one vote and 51 % of the 337 units was needed for approval. Mr. Bassford explained the remaining issue to be resolved related to financing for the project and whether 7500 York would have to subordinate to any of that debt of the leasehold property. Once that issue was resolved, the membership would vote. Proponent Presentation Mark Thomas, President of Ebenezer Society, reviewed their 90 -year history as a faith -based not -for- profit organization that functions as an older adult services arm of the Fairview Health System for over 3,500 seniors. This location was the first senior cooperative in the Country, deemed the most successful thus far, used as a template for other projects, and currently had a 10 -year wait for certain units. Some time ago, the Board of Directors asked Ebenezer if they would add assisted living units. The average age was now over 84 years so they decided to move forward with this design concept and a market study was commissioned. Mr. Thomas stated an Ad Hoc Committee was formed and the process was rich in feedback from the York community. The planned business model was that the assisted units and 7500 York physical plants would operate independently of each other but programming would be aligned. Ebenezer would own and manage the assisted living facility and enter into a land lease for 7500 York. Russ Halverson, 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 208, stated that he had served on the Board of Directors for six years, was President of the Board when the assist living concept was first considered, and Chaired the Ad Hoc Committee that was appointed by the Board to work closely with Ebenezer to develop the proposal being considered tonight. He stated that since its inception 34 years ago, the Cooperative had always been a leader in offering extensive services but was acutely aware that the missing piece in the program was assisted living. Mr. Halverson described the trauma experienced by residents, now more than 12 each year, who must move to assisted living, leaving their family and friends at 7500 York. The Board recognized the expertise of Ebenezer to develop such a program. Town hall meetings were held to share the concept with residents and after comprehensive presentations, more than 90% of those present favored proceeding with the project. At a monthly meeting, again about 90% of those present indicated they favored the Board's approval. Mr. Halverson conceded that with major building projects; some residents were asked to make a sacrifice for the good of the whole community. They were aware that some residents would experience change, which can be upsetting. However, the nature of the Cooperative was to do what was in the best interest of the entire membership with the understanding that some members have to be asked to make adjustments which, in the end, would bring good to the entire community. Mr. Halverson indicated that every effort had been made to keep changes to a minimum and as proposed, the landscaping and building would add beauty to the campus. He advised their Marketing Director had indicated nearly every person on the waiting list had asked if assisted living would be added and if not, they would explore options elsewhere. Mr. Halverson stated if approved, residents of 7500 York would have continuum of care to meet their changing needs without moving to facilities outside the community. Ward Isaacson, Pope Architects, stated the major design considerations were sensitive to the comments of 7500 residents to maintain as much, green space as possible. He advised of the outdoor amenities that would be maintained, noted the impact of traffic would be minimized, described the views from 7500 York and the surrounding community to the building, and that the design would compliment the existing site and architecture geometry. He displayed the site plan and noted the parking was configured to maintain the green space. He described the access points from this facility and displayed a picture of the existing plaza, noting it would be landscaped, surfaced with pavers, and furnished to tie into the existing plaza of 7500 York Avenue, which was currently underutilized. Mr Isaacson noted the one -story link into 7500 York and the building's step back design to mimic the architecture of the 7500 building. The memory care courtyard would be on the west side and provide a secure outdoor space, fire lanes were adequate, and they would maintain the walking path. He then M It -:4-J! ­­l A, fAO +;"rrT%4;n,,+P(zi ?nnR19.16Reg.htm 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 11 presented the four floor plans and described what would be contained on each floor. Mr. Isaacson presented an exterior elevation, noting the building materials of rockface block, stone, Hardi siding, and stucco were complimentary to the 7500 York structure. A "fly by" video was presented that depicted how the building would be located on the site. In response to Council, Mr. Thomas advised that 7500 York residents would receive priority placement for the assisted care units and could receive outpatient rehab at the new facility, if needed. He also indicated they had studied the option for a green roof and found it may be cost prohibitive; however, it would be explored further. Mr. Thomas advised that they usually set aside ten percent of the units for residents who need financial assistance. He explained that Medicare and Medicaid do not cover assisted living. If a 7500 York resident required live -in or skilled care during recovery from a fall, they would have to move to a skilled nursing facility to receive Medicare reimbursement or receive home care services in their own unit to be covered by Medicare Part B. Mr. Thomas further explained the circumstances under which Medicare provided payment under Schedule B regardless of whether the client was in a single - family home or assisted living. Elderly Waiver provided payment through an agreement with the County and was backed by the State and Federal governments. The Council noted the height of 45 feet was from grade on the entry side to the mansard on the fourth story and it was 58 to 60 feet from grade to the middle of the peaked roof. In response to Council, Mr. Bassford stated the Board was comprised of nine members elected by the Cooperative for three -year terms in staggered elections. He indicated he was present at the community meetings at which a vast number of residents were present, a vote taken by raised hands, and the overwhelming number were in favor of exploring this option. The entire Cooperative of 337 units would vote by secret ballot once the outstanding issues were resolved. With regard to the cost, Mr. Thomas explained that cost of assisted living varied a lot depending on the unit and package selected and service components the resident needed. The monthly cost for basic services was $2,500 to $2,800, $4,000 for an assisted living environment and memory care units, and over $4,000 for memory care with medical needs. Jill Nokleby- Kaiser, 10326 Major Drive, Brooklyn Park, Director of Housing for Ebenezer Management Services, explained how the unit, level of service, and packaged services were determined through a collaborative effort of the nursing staff, family, and consumer based on an assessment of their needs. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Public Comment Mark Johnson, 7500 York Avenue, Unit 438, read a statement indicating many residents feel this proposal presented more disadvantages than advantages and requested the Council not approve the application. He stated those who attended the meeting and raised their hand thought they were just requesting additional information and believed the project had now been "steamrolled" along by Ebenezer. Mr. Johnson stated residents were requesting a town hall debate and open meeting to discuss this proposal because they were concerned it was being promoted by those who may be on the Ebenezer payroll. He expressed concern that the project would result in the rolling hills and Evergreen trees at the northwest corner of the campus being replaced by the new building, parking spaces, and garbage disposal area. He suggested the northeast corner would be more suitable for a building. Mr. Johnson asserted that looking at crimson sunsets would be a thing of the past and the character would change due to ambulance and police cars coming and going at all hours of the night. He indicated concern for safety and security due to new campus activity and additional vehicles leading to traffic congestion. Mr. Johnson stated he believed residents of 7500 York deserved substantial payments to lease this land; however, Ebenezer wanted free use of the land for the first several years. He believed this was not the right economy for this project and that some residents did not understand the cost to live in the assisted housing units was not covered by Medicare. Mr. Johnson also expressed concern that parking heavy vehicles on top of the parking garage may have long -term consequences. He felt 7500 York should be good neighbors to Centennial and Coventry townhomes and questioned whether Arl 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 11 they understood the true scope of this expansion. Mr. Johnson asked the - Council to vote "no" on the preliminary zoning and development plan. Robert Jarvis; 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 117, stated he favored the assisted living building on the 7500 campus. He stated he was a nine year resident, member and secretary of the Cooperative, and served on the Assisted Living Ad Hoc Committee. Mr. Jarvis stated he favored the proposal for personal reasons, benefit of the greater community, and for the future of the Cooperative. He felt assisted living would be an ideal fit for many couples to provide assisted living that would be close and connected with covered walkway. Mr. Jarvis noted the median age of 7500 York residents was 84 years 10 months, and 79 residents were age 90 or older, all living independently. Secondly, this facility would fulfill a need in the surrounding communities for an aging population. Thirdly, the potential for associated assisted living was essential to the future of 7500 York as a senior housing cooperative. He closed his comments by reciting a comment made by Barbara Murphy, Marking Director of 7500 York for over 16 years, who strongly supported proceeding with assisted living to provide a continuum of care. He encouraged the Council to approve this application for assisted living and memory care. Marjorie Sullivan, 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 531, stated she had been a resident for a year and a half and while Barbara Murphy mentioned assisted living at the time she bought her unit, she was not interested in that service. Ms. Sullivan stated she enjoyed the beautiful yards and gardens and did not believe Edina had to build on every bit of green space. She felt there was not a "level playing field" for those who oppose the application and that residents should have had the ability to vote whether the Ad Hoc Committee was formed. She felt the Board of Directors was "out of bounds" when it asked for a raised hand vote instead of a formal vote. Ms. Sullivan stated assisted living facilities already exist to the north, south, and another project would be opening soon. She suggested that Ebenezer find another property for assisted living. Gemma Hession, 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 209, stated she had been healthy and independent until several weeks ago when she fell and needed a wheelchair and walker during recovery. She stated this was a new experience for her, having to depend upon her friends at 7500 York during recovery, so it occurred to her that having an assisted living facility on the property would have been perfect because the short stay beds and physical therapy would have been sufficient for her case. Also, her friends could have visited often without special transportation. She stated that as residents of 7500 York age, they may need additional care and it would be pleasant for couples should one need additional care. Gil Langseth, 7500 York Avenue, stated he was trained as a hospital architect and had worked 22 years as a hospital and health care consultant until retirement. He had been a member of the Ad Hoc Committee for two years and found Ebenezer had genuinely solicited opinions of residents, attended many of their meetings, been interested in feedback, and participated in feedback from the total membership. During one "marathon session" last July, Mr. Thomas presented all aspects of the project and again at nine consecutive meetings to stimulate questions, answers, and items of concern from residents. These meetings were well attended. Mr. Langseth stated when Ebenezer helped develop the or project over 30 years ago, the 7500 building was located in the middle of a super block. This created substantial green space, drives, and parking areas on all four sides of the building, allowing residents to live in a "park." Then, 15 years ago, the 28,000 square foot underground garage was constructed, resulting in loss of green space that was replaced by a gravel roof. Originally, the concept was to build the entire assisted unit building on top of the present underground garage to preserve green space but the building would have been only 60 feet from the East tower and considered an intrusion to those residents. Pope Architects very wisely located the building so it would more naturally flow with the geometry of the existing building. Mr. Langseth assured the Council that the location of the proposed building and exterior design were extremely compatible with 7500 York in terms of geometry, form, vertical accents, bay window treatments, and color. He believed tha' Ebenezer and Pope Architects listened to them and the proposed addition would be something 750, York could be extremely proud of and a benefit to the community. _ . /IWQ171 F.Raa Min 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 11 Dr. Esther Ruth Emdars, Chairman of the Finance Committee, stated she was interested in having more services on the campus that would help to compete with new buildings. She stated she served aa on the Assisted Living 'Ad Hoc Committee and watched them work with the architect to create completely new forms and buildings to address what they wanted. Dr. Emdars advised that 7500 York residents ask whether the assisted living building would be started in the Spring before they die, and they were serious because they know that type of unit was needed. She stated she hoped the Council would vote to approve the application. Robb Gruman, Vice President of Facilities -and Guest Services for the Fairview Southdale Hospital, stated he was appearing on behalf of the senior management team of Fairview Southdale Hospital and Fairview Health Systems. He congratulated Ebenezer, Pope Architects, and 7500 York residents for putting together a project mindful of what seniors need. Mr. Gruman believed the plans, fine complement of services, and architecture were suitable in Edina, and assisted living would provide a. continuum of care for 7500 York residents and the community. He urged the Council to support the project and see the wisdom of it as well. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Sorenson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh introduced Resolution No. 2008 -127, Approving a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning for 7500 York Avenue Cooperative with the following. findings: 1) The proposed addition was consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. 2) The proposed density was compatible with densities in the area. 3) Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing was a need in the City. 4) The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval was subject to the following conditions.: 1) The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 30, 2008. 2) Sustainable design. Final Development Plans must include the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A5a -A5c of the staff report. 3) Compliance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. Member Masica seconded the motion. The Council discussion included: concern that consideration was premature because the decision was that of the Cooperative based on its bylaws, democratic structure, and process that had not yet been followed; question remained about the number of units represented in the hand vote; support for Ebenezer's work in the community; providing aging in place that was a priority for .residents who testified during the Comprehensive Plan process; agreement that the 11.5 acre site could accommodate this structure; the proposed landscaping was attractive .in creating rooftop gardens for 9th floor residents to view and generous in providing three times the number of trees required; there was good utilization of sustainable design and .initiatives; and, the step down design and elevation created an interesting facade. In addition, the application was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, the resident's average age was 84, the project would result in no traffic impact, and was within the density requirements. Attorney Knutson stated he had reviewed the resolution of the Board, but had not examined the Cooperative's bylaws. He noted this was a preliminary request, the first step in the process, and the final rezoning request cannot proceed until the Cooperative members actually vote. The Council noted there was currently a nonconforming use with the parking spaces and if rezoned, the parking would conform but the size of many units would not conform. The Council discussed potential consequences should the property be rezoned, but the Cooperative owners not support the project. It was acknowledged that the Council had received a secretary's certification on the action by the nine- Al O\ _n � L4.— c11nirnno Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 11 member Board of Directors. elected by the Cooperative who determined to seek a site plan review for up to 76 senior assisted care units. The Board was asking the Council to take action on that application. A majority of the Council indicated a level of comfort in taking action on the preliminary application with the understanding the proposal would not be considered for final action without the Cooperative's vote results. Attorney Knutson reiterated that before the final rezoning was considered, there would need to be an affirmative vote of a majority of the Cooperative owners and Ebenezer would have to negotiate contracts, agreements, and a lease arrangement with the Cooperative. Member Bennett stated if the property belonged to Ebenezer she would support it enthusiastically. However, the property belonged to the owners of the Cooperative who were divided about the proposal. She stated she believed Council action at this point was premature. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. No one appearefo comment. *AWARD OF BID — 2%09 POND DREDGING IMP STS -357 CONTRACT ENG 09 -1 Moti made by Member Swenson an econded by Member Masica awarding the bid for 2009 P d Dredging, Improvement STS -357, ontract ENG 09 -1, to the recommended low bi er, Fitzgerald Excavating and Trucking, T, c. at $25,250. Motion carried on rollcall vo — five ayes. explained that in order to comply ith Resolution and approved by four fttyo Swenson introduced Resolution seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swen: Motion carried. iVED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DO TIONS Mayor Hovland State Statutes, all donations to City must be adopted by unc rable votes of the Coil acc ting the donations. Member . 2008 -129 Accepting Vari ,$- s Donations. Member Bennett Hovland seconded by Member Masica accepting the T `affiiii Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. seconded by Member Swenson, to reapp int 136 Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swens , Hovlan Motion carried. Motion made by Member Swenson and udy Report of December 3, 2008. ring discussion, Member Masica made a motion, ner and Borhart LLP as City Prosecutor. OF 6504 -6508 STODDARD CLE City Engineer /Pu ''c Works Director Houle explained it was necessary to cross 6508 St and Circle to access 6504 St Bard Circle so Council action was needed to amend the easement eement. He indicated that suffi 'ent access was provided for emergency vehicles and public noti • ation was not required for the relo ation of a private easement. Member Masica made a moti to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -130 A endment to Easement Agreement, Lawrence C. and C. thia B. Holz. Member Bennett seconded t e motion. Ayes: Bennett oush, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion card _ - . *CONFIR ATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member asica approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 4, 2008, and consisting of 21 pages; General Fund $386,328.35; k:20 49�1t� o e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 27, 2009 2008- 017.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description The Ebenezer Society, on behalf. of the 7500 York Cooperative is proposing to build a 76 -unit, 4 -story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9- story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. (See project location on pages Al —A4.) Of the 76 units, 47 units would be for assisted living, 16 would be of memory care and 13 elder care suites. Access to the site would be off Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. Parking would be provided underground, and within a small surface lot off Parklawn Avenue. (See the applicant narrative and plans on pages A5 —A39, and within the attached development books.) Also see the results of the vote of residents authorizing Ebenezer to move forward with the final plans on pages A7 —Al2. This proposed project has received Preliminary Approval by the City Council, per Planning Commission recommendation. (See Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages A80 —A89.) The proposal requires the following: 1. Final Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District to PSR -4, Planned Senior Development District. 2. Final Development Plan. 3. Variances. (To be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals.): a. A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units. b. A 3 -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way. These are the same variances that were highlighted during the Preliminary Development review. 4. Lot Division /Final Plat. The site exists as two lots today. The lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. The site is currently zoned PRD -4, but exists with senior housing. As such, the site is non - conforming in regard to parking requirements. Senior housing does not require the same number of parking stalls that an all -age residential development would. The rezoning would bring the parking requirements into conformance with the City Code. This proposal is consistant with the approved Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. (See approved preliminary plans on pages A20 —A22.) Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: CommonBond Multi- family residential; zoned and guided for high density residential. Easterly: Yorkdale townhomes; zoned and guided medium density housing. Southerly: Edinborough condos; zoned and guided high- density housing. Westerly: Multi- family residential; zoned and guided mixed use Existing Site Features The subject property is 11.6 acres in size and contains a nine -story senior housing building. (See page A3.) The existing facility is a housing cooperative, and was the first senior housing cooperative in the United States. Planning Guide Plan designation: High Density Residential Zoning: PRD -4, Planned Residential District Site Access The site currently has two access points off West 76th Street, and one off Edinborough Way. The proposal would add one access off Edinborough Way and one off Parklawn Avenue. (See page A23.) The access off of Parklawn would be to the surface lot, and the new access of Edinborough would be to the underground parking. PA Traffic Wenck Associates conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both Wenck and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic studies on pages A47 —A79.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 20, 2008, and recommended that the project does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems. (See the minutes on pages A47 —A49.) Parking Including the existing building, a total of 317 parking stalls are required for senior housing, 103 of which must be enclosed. The applicant is proposing 465 parking stalls, 252 of which are enclosed. Access and parking easements would be established between the two parcels. Building The proposed building would be four stories, and made of stone, EFS, metal siding. (See building elevations and renderings on pages A16 —A19. Colors would generally match the existing building. These materials are consistent with those suggested in the Preliminary Development Plan. The applicant will have a materials board at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. Landscaping There are over 200 existing mature trees scattered around the subject property that will remain. Existing mature trees around the proposed new building would have to be removed. (See page A27.) This is consistent with the preliminary plan. However, 44 new overstory trees would be planted. Based on the perimeter of the site, 73 mature trees are required. With the existing and proposed trees the applicant will have over three times the number of trees that is required by City Code. A full compliment of understory trees and shrubs are also proposed. (See landscape plan on pages A29 —A33.) Density The maximum density allowed for the project is 44 units per acre. The proposed density of 36 units per acre would meet the city's code requirement for density in the Planned Senior Housing District. As demonstrated in the table on the following page, the density would be generally consistent with densities of existing multiple - family housing in the area. (See attached map locating multi -unit developments in the area on page A46.) 3 Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 Yorkdale Townhomes 7429 York 90 9 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 Proposed New Apts. at the YMCA 7355 York 130 22 Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A46a. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District review and approval is also required. Preliminary /Final Plat The applicant is also requesting a re -plat of the lot by shifting the existing lot lines on the subject property. As demonstrated on pages A1—A3, the site exists as two lots today. The lot lines would simply be shifted to accommodate the new building and parking area. The result would be that the site would remain two lots. (See proposed Plat on page Al 9b.) 4 Compliance Table * Requires a Variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed use and rezoning reasonable for this site? Yes. The proposed use is reasonable for seven reasons: The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans.. The number of rooms, building material, building footprint, and circulation patterns are all the same as the previously approved plans. 2. The proposed additional multiple - family senior housing would be compatible within the area as there are multiple family residential facilities to the north, south, east and west. (See page A4 and A46.) 5 City Standard (PSR -4) Proposed Setbacks York Avenue 48 & 67 feet (based on height) 300 feet Edinborough Way 48 feet (based on height) 45 feet* Parklawn 12 & 48 feet (based on height) 47 & 60 feet Setback to R -1, Residential 340 feet 664 feet Building Height No maximum requirement 48-6. 7 feet Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 35 feet setback 10 feet (interior) 10+ feet Building Coverage 35% 16% Maximum Floor area per 700 s.f. - 1 Bedroom (br) 10 - 2 bedroom units room 850 s.f. — 2 Bedroom (br) would exceed 850 s.f.* 7 - 1 bedroom units would exceed 700 s. f.* Density Allowed 44 units per acre 36 units per acre Parking Stalls — PSR-4 317 total stalls required; 103 must be 465 stalls proposed, 252 District enclosed (based on 416 units; 27 , are enclosed employees and 2 company vehicles) Over -story Trees 73 Trees 200+ Trees (44 new trees on new lot) * Requires a Variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed use and rezoning reasonable for this site? Yes. The proposed use is reasonable for seven reasons: The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans.. The number of rooms, building material, building footprint, and circulation patterns are all the same as the previously approved plans. 2. The proposed additional multiple - family senior housing would be compatible within the area as there are multiple family residential facilities to the north, south, east and west. (See page A4 and A46.) 5 3. The proposed density of 36 units per acre meets the City's Code requirement for density in the Planned Senior Housing District; and is generally consistent with densities of existing apartment buildings in the area. (See attached map locating multi -unit developments in the area on page A46, and in the above table.) 4. The sites close proximity to amenities that seniors would take advantage of, such as the YMCA, Centennial Lakes Park, and the Promenade. 5. Sustainable Design. The applicant is proposing sustainable design principles, consistent with those proposed as part of the Preliminary Development Plan. (See pages A13 —A15.) 6. As mentioned above, the existing roadways would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both Wenck and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic studies on pages A47 —A79.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 20, 2008, and recommended that the traffic generated would not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems. (See the minutes on page A47.) 7. The project would provide an additional opportunity for senior housing within the City of Edina. Based on the demographic data from the Comprehensive Plan, and the fact that there is a lengthy waiting list to get into the existing facility, the proposed new senior housing would fill a need in the City. It may also allow existing residents in single- family.homes within the city who want to remain in Edina, and opportunity to stay. The result may provide opportunity for a new family with kids to move to the city into the single- family home that was made available by a new resident to this facility. • Is the Planned Senior District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PSR -4 district is appropriate for the site. The rezoning would bring the existing site more into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The site exists today with senior housing, however, is zoned for "all -age" multiple - family residential. The site is parked for seniors; however, the current zoning requires parking for "all -age" multiple - family residential. If the addition were proposed under the existing zoning designation, additional variances would be required. A density variance and a parking stall variance would be required. The density requirement under the current zoning would allow only 27 additional units on the site. The parking stalls required under the current zoning would be 832 total spaces; and 395 are proposed. By rezoning the site to match the existing and proposed use of the site, the density and parking would be code compliant. f. Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. Per Section 850.04.Subd.l .F., of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that, the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests. Should the preliminary plan be approved, the variances would be considered in more detailed with the Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals. 1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable for this site. The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two- bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. The maximum standards were developed to ensure affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential districts. The existing and proposed units within the 7500 development were and are not intended to be entirely for affordable housing. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). Ten two- bedroom units and seven one - bedroom units would exceed the maximum requirement. In regard to the setback variance, the hardship is caused by the existing location of the underground parking garage. This structure was not built to support the weight of a four -story addition above it. Therefore, the applicant developed a site plan working around this structure. They also do not wish to disturb the open space and garden area along York Avenue. The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building, and the height of buildings in the area. The requested variance would be a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback. (See page A23.) 7 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is that this site exists with senior housing, and does not conform to the maximum standards for senior housing, and an underground parking deck that cannot support an addition above it. 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed four -story addition would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are several buildings in the immediate area that are taller and have greater densities than the proposed development. The subject property contains a 9 -story building. Recommendation Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PRD -4 to PSR -4, Final Development Plan and Preliminary & Final Plat to build a 76 -unit four -story addition to the existing building at 7500 York Avenue for the Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. 2. The proposed addition is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. 3. The proposed density is compatible with densities in the area. 4. Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing is a need in the City. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2009.. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2009. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. The following must be submitted to the City before a building permit it is issued: a. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. b. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 21, 2009. 5. The design and construction of the project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 6. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. Variances Recommend that the Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council approve the following variances: A maximum square footage variance for 17 dwelling units. 2. A 3 -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way. Approval is based on the following'findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 0J There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the. location of the existing underground parking deck, which would not support the proposed addition. In addition, the. proposed building location avoids the large open space and garden area along York Avenue. 2. The setback variance is for a minor 3 -foot intrusion into the required setback. 3. The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of 850 square feet for two - bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. 4. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. 5. The maximum square footage standards were developed to ensure some affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential Districts. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). Deadline for a city decision: August 18, 2009 10 City of Edina 7< i00° 71,9 71Ot 7957 f' 3N7 121 7 1 10J 3775 7118 7171 71s/ u nia i97rzs 0 0 71134 7205 7200 24 0 p 7201 209 7250 723S 7260 7102 ' 1016 T.Ifi]�aGt 1. rnna.,nt v.n 0 n 10t` f1,c �J810 .'T09 G 1ti1r��6pt 7821 tOOI 5802 }707 0 7335 2f\1000 =°P5� 14 t eOL g09 GOB 519 7355 Mi �7t02 513 7380 tl00 90,507 Yl"'a p'ra 24 501 7390 7773 2:7213 6,203 SiS 309, "4017, 3400 `•.t 7000 1n 7405 7 74087 ,c303� -C f47317 2< 7425 7. 1 I r1OO 7 0 0 7501 p 7 7 7. 21 7 3205 it 0 0 7209 175 7600 7605 / 3601 0 7701 7651 ma7,vJal 0 0 140 4 , 7700 Qr ; 7701, I 3369 7604 34M 3770 21 24 �m 21 a y- • a PID:3202824330367 3401 Parklawn Ave Edina, MN 55435 A( House Number Labels Sbeat Name labels .! CNN Llmlb ^/ Creaks Lake Noma l Lakes D Parka ElPercale •• ty pow t !OLL 001 i059L tz 0 wl lw!uualu 16 91 LF so 09 60, C '07c OWN oz� vet ye 001D ooq" W M too, okiwpl 1111c L4 *L Cori 0 90L OOY[lDIL' ;a E02 £1Z liz EZ ZZ to, D7 iii. 09 106 009 t 90? 606 R Z09 N oz. 1,09 l Pz .4 019 5111 ftnI O-Z K W7. 16- oo,& sazl t... 'VI y� .S a _ _ sanv f � BrI fI� M[7 {p N � �•^ 0" N� O pp O O b ti O �O O � b�- - i,;• � � ?'K. III =�� . d'a!Ma�r�€ •�� Itl w0 ��. ✓P� 4i • •a' `a Li E— '. Am' _ tom• f ' M' �1 to ma 0 I2l2i I I I1 ( J�pp701�� 72JSi LLLIJLJI 7J\f0001. e 7ya 727J 2T2 722 4aaa .7400 `� I VC it 7fOT 7I -- i 4100 7!3U 7Tb1 4000 ni +r3 :'4[W 0 I 0 nos. -�.e. �nau. - >,�pi1Cl ✓Y)d 06 ]103 City of Edina 24 ramwn M1 IJSS 7403 7d09 7413 !-- 7423 �csx ims 7800 0 0 7 -cy -6pa 60B '612 0 '61E p :lOi :620 p 024 0 \9 ICO D .OG 1700 V 0 PID:3202824310367 3401 Parklawn Ave Edina, MN 55435 EXISTING � U �CYli1RJLL�� /� Legend HDUSV Number L bals Strom Nam. Labels City Limits ^/ Creaks Lake Names ( Lakes Parks Zoning DAPD(Auten.Ekh`kmg 0a 1 DYDDdlkluod Dov --, 0—j ■ LD0-51.ma- b—F l D.— 51 ® `JOD.41= 1�aDaca F+r= ^IOmra41 D ® F'aD.l (Pimp GCn.rr�Dmr_�11 ® PCD21Ptnnd Cca_r _YD Y -A ® K0.01 Plwnm CC�ra�®IDpr.�>I DPCOS(Ptnnvd CFRm=nax Dar -T DemlPm— d- -D-1 DPOD-, cpt.ed off.. D.n_ -, 11 DPWD2(Pou.0ff_Dort 21 ■ PAD- 11Ptinnvd Rcicr.Da+r711 ® vRD 2lvinned A --D-21 ® PRO 2(Ptnn.d Ra•.GSx: De!.nct 21 D PRD<IPtnn ­1 ® PRD.54Prannn0 peaten: Udlny 51 0 PsR.4(Ptnnedscn ' Reeden q I-1 R.1fSnpb Da >.b9UM Omny1 ®� R.2;Deul6 w_s Un 0.-1 ElR1101Rc -p vnm l.!axO :.r�l OParcais PPtIgPT V # R 9 XT Id BACKGROUND 7500 York Cooperative, developed in 1978, was the first senior housing cooperative model in the United States. There are 337 units at 7500 York. The structure is member - owned and is governed through vast committees. Its mission statement is to provide a safe, healthy and pleasant home for its members to enjoy an active, independent lifestyle in a senior cooperative environment. The Cooperative has been guided and managed by Ebenezer since its inception in 1978. Ebenezer has been a provider of compassionate, community- centered care for older adults and others in need for over 90 years. They offer a full range of coordinated programs and services including senior housing, assisted living, memory care, transitional and long -term care, adult and intergenerational programs and a variety of community -based services throughout the state of Minnesota and one facility in Iowa. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST- SUBDIVISION APPLICATION The shareholders at 7500 York Cooperative approached Ebenezer with a request for help in their aging in place needs at the cooperative. Over the years, shareholders have developed close friendships with their neighbors by their active participation in resident run activities. As the members age, some have had to move to assisted living and some into more skilled care facilities. The figures show that over the last few years there has been between 25 — 40 members leaving per year to move into assisted living, long term care and other housing because of health related care issues. The trend will continue to see 35 to 40 move outs per year for these reasons. It is hard for the existing shareholders to keep in touch and to visit their family members and friends who have had to move. There also are shareholders who are still living at 7500 York that could benefit from a facility with more care, but are reluctant to leave their friends and family. An answer to some of these aging in place issues is to build on to 7500 York Cooperative and add an Assisted Living, memory and elder care suite model. The model plan would have 76 units which would include 47 units of assisted living, 16 units of Memory care and 13 elder care suites. This is the first cooperative in the state of Minnesota that is requesting this vision to create a continuum of care for seniors in cooperative housing. All areas of life could benefit by this need. Currently, there are 500 people on the waiting list to move into 7500 York Cooperative, many of which are aging in their single family homes within the community. By establishing the assisted living building there will be options available for the current shareholders to move into. This would free up cooperative shares for those on the waiting list and thereby increase availability of existing single family housing within the city of Edina. The cooperative shareholders as well as Ebenezer are both committed to building an eco- friendly and sustainable addition to help create this continuum of care for older adults as they age at 7500 York. They want to work to include advance technological and green solutions to keep up with future building and senior care needs, while being respectful to the environment. The Lot Division- The site exists as two lots today. The lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. AT BACKGROUND 7500 York Cooperative, developed in 1978, was the first senior housing cooperative model in the United States. There are 337 units at 7500 York. The structure is member - owned and is governed through vast committees. Its mission statement is to provide a safe, healthy and pleasant home for its members to enjoy an active, independent lifestyle in a senior cooperative environment. The Cooperative has been guided and managed by Ebenezer since its inception in 1978. Ebenezer has been a provider of compassionate, community- centered care for older adults and others in need for over 90 years. They offer a full range of coordinated programs and services including senior housing, assisted living, memory care, transitional and long -term care, adult and intergenerational programs and a variety of community -based services throughout the state of Minnesota and one facility in Iowa. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST- FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The shareholders at 7500 York Cooperative approached Ebenezer with a request for help in their aging in place needs at the cooperative. Over the years, shareholders have developed close friendships with their neighbors by their active participation in resident run activities. As the members age, some have had to move to assisted living and some into more skilled care facilities. The figures show that over the last few years there has been. between 25 — 40 members leaving per year to move into assisted living, long term care and other housing because of health related care issues. The trend will continue to see 35 to 40 move outs per year for these reasons. It is hard for the existing shareholders to keep in touch and to visit their family members and friends who have had to move. There also are shareholders who are still living at 7500 York that could benefit from a facility with more care, but are reluctant to leave their friends and family. An answer to some of these aging in place issues is to build on to 7500 York Cooperative and add an Assisted Living, memory and elder care suite model. The model plan would have 76 units which would include 47 units of assisted living, 16 units of Memory care and 13 elder care suites. This is the first cooperative in the state of Minnesota that is requesting this vision to create a continuum of care for seniors in cooperative housing. All areas of life could benefit by this need. Currently, there are 500 people on the waiting list to move into 7500 York Cooperative, many of which are aging in their single family homes within the community. By establishing the assisted living building there will be options available for the current shareholders to move into. This would free up cooperative shares for those on the waiting list and thereby increase availability of existing single family housing within the city of Edina. The cooperative shareholders as well as Ebenezer are both committed to building an eco- friendly and sustainable addition to help create this continuum of care for older adults as they age at 7500 York. They want to work to include advance technological and green solutions to keep up with future building and senior care needs, while being respectful to the environment. A4 Bassford, Hanvik & Pyles, P.A. CHARLES A. BASSFORD, JR. Mr. Paul Woxland Attorneys at Law 19000 - 27th Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Office: (763) 208 -1456 Fax: (763) 205 -3600 Home: (763) 475 -1730 April 14, 2009 Mr. Mark F. Thomas Director, Multi Family Housing U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 920 Second Avenue South, #1300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4017 Mr. Scott A. Werdal Director of Production U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 920 Second Avenue South, #1300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4017 Robert J. Olson, Esq. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -1498 President and Chief Executive Officer Ebenezer Society 2722 Park Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Charles Sorenson, Esq. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Minneapolis Field Office 920 Second Avenue South, #1300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4017 Mr. Cary Teague City Planner Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Assisted Living Project by Ebenezer at Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative Gentlemen: The Membership of Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative has voted on the captioned Project. Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the Ballot which was provided to each member of the Cooperative for the vote. By each Ballot, each Member voted "yes" or "no" on three (3) inseparable issues. The first issue was the form of long -term lease that the Cooperative would enter into with a limited liability company to be formed by Ebenezer. The second issue was the design, location, dimensions and appearance of the proposed assisted living facility and grounds. Drawings of the buildings and grounds had been provided to the Membership. Third, was the replatting of the Cooperative's real estate so the assisted living project would be located on a parcel owned by, but separate from, Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative's facility. A copy of the proposed replatted property had been displayed to the Membership. Al Mr. Paul Woxland, Director Mr. Mark Thomas, President Charles Sorensen, Esq. Mr. Scott A. Werdal, Director of Production Robert Olson, Esq. Mr. Cary Teague Page 2 On Friday, April 3, 2009, the vote of the Membership was tallied and counted. Enclosed is the Secretary's Certification of Voting Results. The vote, as shown by the Certificate, was 256 in favor of the Project, 62 against, 2 votes in favor of the Project were rejected by the Election Judges as not properly cast, and two ballots were returned unmarked. Therefore, total votes actually cast by the Membership amounted to 320, out of a total Cooperative Membership of 337 members, leaving only 17 Members who did not cast a Ballot. , This law firm has been counsel for Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative for over 21 years. At no time in its history has the Membership voted in such large numbers. By that vote, the Project is favored by over 75 % of the Membership of the Cooperative. This is a showing of extremely strong support for the Project within the Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative community. We believe that each of you has a copy of the pertinent documents with regard to this project. The Board of Directors of Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative would now encourage HUD and Ebenezer to expedite the resolution of any remaining financing issues for the Project so the long -term lease may be executed, the real estate replatted, the property rezoned and the ground broken on the construction of the assisted living facility. matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or wish to discuss this Yours very truly, BASSFORD, HANV i By Charles A. Bassford, CAB /cmr Enclosure CC: Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative Z: \CAB \7500YORK \W OXLAND041409LTR 41 SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED YORK COOPERATIVE SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION OF VOTING RESULTS I, Hulda Gieschen, Corporate Secretary of Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative, a Minnesota cooperative corporation, do hereby certify, on behalf of the Corporation, the following voting results from a vote of the Membership which was tallied on April 3, 2009, after Special Meetings of the membership were conducted on March 19 and March 20, 2009, pursuant to written notice duly mailed or delivered to each member with proof thereof duly filed with the Minutes of said meetings. Special Meetings of the Membership of the Cooperative were duly called by the Board of Directors and held on Thursday, March 19 and Friday, March 20, 2009. 2. The purpose of such Special Meetings was to present to the Membership information both for and against the proposed assisted living project on property owned by Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative and to be constructed and operated by Ebenezer York Assisted Living, LLC subject to the terms of a long -term lease. 3. A copy of the Ballot provided to each member is attached to this Certificate as "Exhibit A". 4. A total of two hundred seventy -nine (279) Memberships, representing approximately eighty -three (83 %) percent of the three hundred thirty-seven (337) Memberships eligible to vote in the Cooperative were personally represented at the meetings. 5. One hundred two (102) Memberships, representing thirty (30 %) percent of the Membership, were necessary to establish a quorum of the members. 6. More than a quorum of the members attended the Meetings. 7. The issue presented to the Membership for its vote was whether or not the Cooperative should proceed with Ebenezer on the assisted living project by entering into a long- term lease and consenting to the construction of an assisted living facility on the leased property owned by the Cooperative as replatted, was submitted to the vote of the Membership. 8. The form ofproposed long -term lease, the appearance, design, dimensions and location of the assisted living building and grounds, and the replat of the Cooperative's property were all presented to the members. 9. On April 3, 2009, after mailed ballots had been returned, the vote was tallied and counted. 10. A majority of the entire Membership, or one hundred sixty -nine (169) votes or more, in favor of proceeding with the assisted living project were deemed necessary by the Board of Directors for approval by the Membership. p 11. The voting results are as follows: Yes (for the project) 254 No (against the project) 62 Ballots rejected by Election Judges or not marked 4 Total ballots cast 320 12. The lease of a replatted portion of the Cooperative's property, subject to the terms and conditions of a long -term lease substantially in the form submitted to the Membership prior to the vote and to be entered into by a limited liability company to be formed by Ebenezer Society has been approved by a substantial majority of the members of Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative. SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED YORK COOPERATIVE Dated: April 14, 2009 By /444 'A.�_ Hulda Gieschen, Cooperative Secretary Subscribed to and sworn to before me this 14'h day of April, 2009. , CHARLES A. BASSFORD, JR. ♦ NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. "s1, 2010 -2- Z: \CAB \7500YORK\SECRETARY' SCERTIFICATION.2009 AID . Ehhibit a 7500 YORK COOPERATIVE SPECIAL VOTE OF MEMBERS PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT BALLOT The Board of Directors of Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative is submitting to the vote of the Membership whether the Cooperative should proceed with the Ebenezer York Assisted Living Project. This matter involves three (3) inseparable issues.. They are: 1. The long -term lease of a portion of the Cooperative's property for the construction and operation of the assisted living facility. The form of lease and a summary of its terms and conditions has been made available to the Membership. 2. The design, location, dimensions and appearance of the proposed assisted living facility and grounds. Drawings of the building and grounds have been presented to the Membership. The replatting of the Cooperative's real estate so that the assisted living project will be constructed on a parcel owned by, but separate from, Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative. A copy of the proposed replatted property creating the two (2) separate parcels has been displayed to the Membership. If you approve of the Cooperative proceeding with = Ebenezer on the- assisted living project, place an X or checkmark in the box that contains the word YES. If you oppose the Cooperative proceeding with the assisted living project, place an X or a checkmark in the box that contains the word NO. Once you have marked your ballot, cast your vote by following the Voting Instructions on the reverse side. IVES (For the Project) 41( NO (Against the Project) VOTING INSTRUCTIONS Pursuant to the By -Laws of the Cooperative as interpreted by the Board of Directors and applicable Minnesota Statutes, the following voting regulations and procedures shall apply: 1 One vote per Membership (apartment); 2. No proxy voting will be allowed; 3. After you have marked your ballot, fold and place it back in the yellow envelope in which you received it. Do not remove the label. 4. To cast your.vote, the yellow envelope containing your ballot must be: a. Deposited in the blue ballot box by the Business Office before 2:00 p.m., Friday, April 3, 2009. b. Mailed to Seventy Five Hundred York Cooperative and received before 2:00 p.m., Friday, April 3, 2009. Should the Membership vote in favor of the proposed assisted living project, minor changes to the terms and conditions of the long -term lease and other documents related to the project may be required. In that event, the Board of Directors will exercise its judgment and discretion with regard to such changes. It is also important to recognize that the vote of the Membership is not binding on Ebenezer. Ebenezer Society may determine that the project is not viable, even though a majority of the Membership of Seventy Five Hundred York has voted in favor of it. Please do not hesitate to contact Perry Strassman, Manager, should you have any questions with regard to voting procedures. All Ebenezer Has Four E's! Ebenezer York Assisted Living An Eco- Friendly Enriched Environment Listed below are potential sustainable design features for Ebenezer York Assisted Living. Location and Neighborhood Fabric: A Project is located on a site with access to existing roads, water, sewers and other infrastructure within or contiguous to existing development. A Project is located within walking distance of community facilities, retail establishments, and civic amenities. Include sidewalks or other suitable pathways within a multi- family property or single - family subdivision are included to encourage walking within and off the site and connectivity to the surrounding environment. Orient the building to make use of passive solar heating. Provide connections to sidewalks or pathways in surrounding neighborhoods. Bike Racks for employees, residents and grandchildren. Site: Building position to take best advantage of day lighting, summer shading, winter solar benefit and protection from prevailing winter weather patterns. Best Practices in Storm Water Management — reduce impervious surface and aquifer - recharge. Mark all storm drains or storm inlets: (not currently shown on civil plans.) 6A Rainwater — Capture the first inch of rainfall that falls in a twenty -four hour period. A No Ponds gA Implement EPA Best Management Practices for erosion and sedimentation control during construction. wA Green -Space and Mature tree preservation- Some of the Mature trees will remain intact. Underground Infiltration/Rate Control Tanks Exterior light design for light - pollution control Water Efficiency: Landscape design will incorporate as many plants as possible that require little irrigation. Select trees and plants appropriate to the climate, including drought- tolerant species in regions with low levels of rainfall during the summer or throughout the year. Use appliances and plumbing fixtures that reduce water use and sewage outflow. All Energy and Atmosphere: Include high- efficiency Mechanical and Electrical Systems to reduce fuel and electrical consumption. Take advantage of local utility programs offering incentives as much as possible. y Motion sensing devices to reduce light levels or turn off lights in unoccupied rooms. @A Use Energy Star labeled refrigerators and dishwashers. Install Energy Star labeled lighting fixtures that use fluorescent Bulbs. y Meet or exceed Energy Star standards, or ASHRAE 90. Materials and Resources: Use locally sourced materials, as feasible, to reduce carbon impact from transportation. Used recycled or salvaged materials wherever possible and cost effective. JamesHardie cement -based Siding: meets LEED Certification. (For more information, visit http: / /www.jameshardie.com) CertainTeed Shingle Products. Recycle construction waste materials. Windows — Low E coatings and good thermal performance qualities. Healthy Living Environmental Quality: Commit to a smoke -free building (www.mnsmokefreehousing.org) Provide fresh air in accordance with energy codes (or exceed). Enhance occupant control of lighting and HVAC controls (individual space control) Use operable windows to bring fresh air into the building Design spaces to take advantage of day lighting and views Use low- emitting materials • Specify low volatile organic compound (VOC) sealants and adhesives • Specify low VOC paint and primers Use composite wood only if free of added urea formaldehyde or if sealed with a low VOC sealant or laminate for cabinetry/countertops and millwork. Use Carpet and Rug Institute's Green Label certified carpet in carpeted areas. Do not install carpets in basements, entryways, laundry rooms, bathrooms, or kitchens. To ensure effective removal of moisture, install energy efficient bathroom fans that exhaust to the outdoors. Adequately ventilate all living areas by providing fresh air per occupant either via the HVAC system or through natural ventilation. Appropriately size HVAC system to prevent short- cycling of heating or air conditioning and ensure adequate dehumidification. To avoid moisture problems, use high efficiency hot water heaters or install conventional hot water heaters so that overflow or leaks are captured by drains. Do not install mold - propagating materials, such as unperforated vinyl wallpaper at exterior walls and unsealed grout, in wet areas. Use highly durable moisture resistant materials in tub %shower. y Provide surface drainage of water away from windows, walls and foundations. y Clothes dryers must be exhausted directly to the outdoors. `y Seal wall, floor and joint penetrations with low VOC caulk. Al A Page 2 of 3 Continued Operations and Maintenanee: E,A Provide a plan for educating employees and residents regarding the intent of integrated sustainable building and landscaping features as well as their proper use and maintenance. bey Use of Organic Fertilizer y Basic Recycling practices of Glass/Plastic and Paper will be incorporated. bey Also, different recycle bins will be located inside the lower level - Bins that will encourage the collection for recycling of- * Eyeglasses Batteries • Cell Phone • Soup Labels/Box Tops for Education • Wire Hangers • Plastic Bags A( Page 3 of 3 VIEW OF ENTRY FROM SOUTH - 7500 YORK NORTH TOWER PROJECT 7500 York Assisted Living Edina, Minnesota 0443 -09 1 COMMISSION #21252 -07142 mm mm _ �av VIEW OF ENTRY FROM WEST - EDINBOROUGH WAY AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTH PROJECT 7500 York Assisted Living Edina, Minnesota 04 -23-09 1 COMMISSION )121252 -07142 'A VIEW OF MAIN ENTRY FROM PARKLAWN AVENUE r oL. L ti ■ Fri SOUTH ELEVATION PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION 2�J.r Fl�l 5 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 41 KEY PLAN eW El 8-- P, E 6\1 ". ". 4�9 V APR 7 4 2 ml Tam T GENERAL NOTES - PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: EBENEZER SOCIETY 2ND ADDITION °= =._. NOTES CORRESPONDM TO EASEMENTS TO BE PLATTED AS: PROPOSED AREA: �"'.."..: �`M1 .__ '""' •� .'� >.r �.+ -v,•` „� w• •'• —,,; F.r 40 20 O 40 so m EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: , awaa , 1992¢IDI m11 am AIMma �� •.rte1 `•+• > °i•�"°'> 1O1 �,�,° iimmm P= c mumaE,naP,mn Amnw, :wlm "w'b. 2wx+ .4ea• e.l ,n r .... a:�W'e:a.'� vr.+... +..a - n r. SCALE IN FEET "w.yF faa,x s,v m. to ; w , mull m ¢tr DWI "•'••r ¢ ,a o� . u Im ,�`• `mr'�•T .�r ` Paw t SUBDIVISION SUMMARY: ! it y"`',°`.','���°"n..e. e a �i. ma [no¢m+ mitt ,n Amnia Aoana .ab. �xti wa. �a va.: Tr .'m. - n,m LanlF ,rh",es1n to Ie�IA nawW e, b,e a vya r�l lla INtl °rvaie` vav� f°�a.c >' s�'"� STATEMENT OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS - a: Ora. »' °p -'3.- I °`•:- .°.-w, ' , ... a ...-.+ �,` °° { ` i r �A ,. g•A .J��. � t° {* , _ °�,,. �d' � r, x° .�, � a .fir I - - - - - - - - - - - .".'e.r.�. `�."rl•n w a��n r��a..'"u. SCALE: f INCH = IO FEET �� ___.- -_ �e <.. --..a" �->,>5 ' _•- •—°•.. J 't`F -'-� — ...,C.Jv. •�i - ,��`I._a'� -"'� —� y� I ._— _ - -•� _..— • —_..— .rn w� [. ,. +�� i '�rtw Isar M r a Vs a • � a vn[+l t , s a" :t b a w°." d ` A n ii' .r- e § ., r-,1 T I �. maa,.�s r r ..: S"e�••:' :."°r e_ kD - I,�R 52SITS ADDREM Emma ulim t. zb 554!5 LOO Ownl:RF Ebena.e I I CONTACT x a: a R ra (slz) Bz9 -t 6 °I JI 2]22 Pak A anus ,b : "/ i r rw .r j ^ I� J eaPn. I° F '1 ra µ."+' kr a' 'A Ci vv�`. I I „�. I(')i I xee A I T" I .. IL�J .�. � I .0 -tir9M- •r' i , 1 I �, , I. _ - ..,r. - -- - -n >r -- - - - - -- I i I / ; a _•, ,� I .t I 1.•' 19a A. , e d 4 0�- al•a-, 'u .\ a ...�I.} I §I gD63 n91 ° 1D f E• v16B on.•Min'newla 0 I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF I zg .* I I `i 1 I LEGEND EBENEZER SOCIETY j a,, 2ND ADDITION tt , _a - tJ��o.,, !�pask- fly3ye.:wr� r �' -r it :r t ?� +r m °t m .. �I o �F_� I jl ©,•o•^ Wore W : , 4�.. ::' -y � • 9.98. � ,- S.Aa®o r '� (: )i I - - -� a,k ' xl-I �" .J I } II— _ - - --- uo+..'rO°r. ,..oea 4'n.r,,,� EBENEZER --- --- III 'y �y`a' "'`I �er�` r!- PYia,'..\ a. L$- raa-'t I °• h n .a- Noo UTL f•..3� I JAII - 8 1 \� �' ,j,71 r -(IPP ,i� i v S�} •;� `^ + . ya •�_ek' j E . -41 II i SIis7 � 0t I \ I I 7600 YORKASMIrD UYMG Ilk I N{ti 69 IX i. V J11L `• 1� '' I ` I NI �(ot "i /� Its, r i �. , .µ r Lt_ I I I ca, r.a,. T,.e m....aa.) PmuA laxxE6orA e,J .i,v�. I�I'4`,-. -, ;ire) —�" /.. 'r= .mmTnrr{'•.ara m I �I .a. Il n `,[;_ 11rti'11 fm's.! ',�'�'� .. _7 ,tiv� - �,r.r.::fa 'i' "1, a'. / �,�` ..� —. " §I I °m "•m:..... HENNEPIN COUNTY 3 . n I 1( w.. a �''., I '`. y��. r � _— a•� ��`,� 191 I � I j�-- - -; °!"- '_ :° °s.e�o.«�a.w,�. ryry m J 3 +s -d*C It 1 e } .� •�i'J' `fy1 -4� '� -> Yom` ppI ' Kam- 'HuaP..r':°- I F :i ell,' 1 i il_!R' u•�(`' I. .� -Z - _ _ - L ^s• •,A_--- - - - -�� ��'n xu4a I 1 I HARRY 9.JONNBON CO.. INL. VICINITY MAP LAND SURVEYORS y d, �•°!' X89.5 e) _ _ _ aai r , .. _ x -. - - -- _ -- I I I A vva sr. BI"xminllla^, YN. elgl I T4M. 9624149N Fo 95241Y.11M rtv `_ _- ti— ._':a— . - -`S• 08.56_' ".`N r roLlA -._ is°Y , —._.- J,. -°. =.�i• 1• I I g y ...Ma+rarm iQ` �\ ••' ^�' 7 •r � , to �..- •'» f' • -W- ..f -,_- .VI,g -j JT I� -. I - I---- •— �.r -96 'I IY, '� Q �' - IA aS('� -,. _'4- �!°: -- - - - -:M� —— ',•wuA\� ���L3 - - -_ I �•+ gym" 2001410.02 • {'- ry I.i` -T._sw.':bi���. • x..r._>„e .. -e.>� a. -rw xr. A xxr..,."...r". 10F1 9 SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED YORK CAMPUS 1C.R. DOC. NO. ...,L i— AVERY u.,•c .A.m mw. vaw ,�.mna ....oa van. m..... LQp�. �. °...,.,E .. �. — _i — ADDITION -- I nw mirwra.br..w ramr �). ^RK" A1AIA1 bj r L` �, o ��' � a wur rar, .0 f.�p ue�sr me Gr.rea a ,o..wu m.aua er mfr a.r eumro 1s u vpr a, m ww. mem w _ b M ,v_ __ _ N 8956'31' E 55].]2 ...... I C) I 350.9a I 206.38 ,m Rs I �� G 1 L I . ` I „- — :.:,L:a.m,.m h v..err ,rer I X J m r..i•� /,� <y� `- aae..r.rmr .. awxasm..rr rrr a_a�b,.wa.ryram. mma._r r m_ I �0C +' — I do 2 -- -_ --:!!.z 0510' W acct o+so. x.a.. d.a. �...r. J I er n ... ;' — — — — —, R� �— — — — Ld r,...n a ima nA, yr avx+0rnl ur au er e� w..r w _ rr r m_ ' S0 70 O 50 fm - J YO - ew - - - -- 5 5955/2' W 522.59 'L.55.26 L - __ 9.520D BCALl 92 MET T _ 9 � rVr �" i / Tr T -lrrr I 0 O ee..s, m... u.1 as.m, aaa�•u r .w, a.[ yr rear or em a sw,n xum® .vib cows e a �vanmmi a. ��wa.nms ru r .rw .. ..... se _ ' I '�. ra r- _ s 2 9939 N 8259.85' W r----------------------- ' F19A L P�A�T I bj r L` �, o ��' � � �`J C) I Ld Ld :.:,L:a.m,.m .. o>.aa a. as m.v®,,. � „ �.... X J m r..i•� , �� 'L';�.,�..i O +' — I do -- acct o+so. x.a.. d.a. �...r. J I er n ... ;' — — — — —, R� �— — — — . 62'W39' I 6 - r,...n a ima nA, yr avx+0rnl ur au er e� w..r w _ rr r m_ ' S0 70 O 50 fm - J YO - ew - - - -- 5 5955/2' W 522.59 'L.55.26 L - __ 9.520D BCALl 92 MET T _ 9 � rVr �" i / Tr T -lrrr 0 r----------------------- „,,, HARRY ir �rae.ryPem�w LAND D SURVEYRVEY SURVEYORS L F19A L P�A�T a L YORKDALETOWNHOMES r SITE DATA YORK AVENUE !IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I . I _ I 1 ail I_J� 1 I I •� � �„ �o- I I 1. c EDINBOROUGH WAY m - /5,��%-� - -�/ 3 SITE PlH 3 SITE PLAN �AZ7 plppp 1 7' =4V -0' Hppa. his 9 ®f ALI p9culoosloy A f P AAA a L .PR696566 AW $v t olio . ... PARKLAWN AVENUE ^ - 0 F.• I al x� oa� 0 �a w� I f 'J.I 4 i 1 OvEn. =LLSIT6 rNnR I'- as 1 w al 0 CITY TREE CODE: REQUIREMENTS: TIIR PERIMEFEN OF THE NLW EUT IS Ill. LF UIYIUEU DY b- M.TJ UVLPSTUP\' TIIFF`J PFQlI1RFJ). TIIN RI:QOIPF.O TRFI: BPFAROIIwW IS ASfU110W9: REOUIR M 5110 \VN ON PLTN: 21 URNA fNTAI. l61 (IOIrOMPLISIINFARV IJl) IQ ACCENT NI IRI ISIIMARY 101 IRI f1n1 IR) PLANT RSQUuuE onor NmES: rr141 u— NoIRFI:OMMENDIII R111AYE S1R.TI A I --I' w,%NRTY OF NEW OR RELIX:ATF.D wrF T,OT ART: GusAm THAN J' DIA CAIJFFA Mr. TO TIHI IHUII /.IURTN.ITY RATII AND LACK OF STAUILITY WE TUTIIL AMOUNT OFTIIL NOUT SYSTEM FNA'r Is LOSE SMAUL'R IIIELS WILL ROOF IN MUCII PA4T ..fl- -ILL RESULI' IN A MULL 1 MOBS SFAULE lnN 1'I WT WILL OIRUROw T IE LAROFR PLA .WI.r"S wA REL FT YSIIORTAMOUNTOF'n- BASED ON THIS. IT IS AELTIM- IINDED MLTT TIIE CRY TAU TNI3 IITIO LLNSUILEA'I'ION WHIN RLYmwINO TILE PLANS AS 411OWN. Plant Schedule _ Ame StJ1t E PLAN fffumiNAI NAP Part �fR[urtu 7500 YOR ASSISTED LIVIN EDINA, MINNESO- f'I..DP'I�:.. Overall Sit. Plan eee�� —rte rlRZr L1 TEA.�..I�. rm we e® e.s TNR T.y..a,al TnI.V EMI f>.M reuW[eln 1 pl N.W .NM1" v..Y6n.ulluwq I.enS•.A aN'mR.v fWMw n...,W�rw Fap� s feAPM A�.M1 IINy 1„w.. �.•.�'A�.e•' ISirW RrUyArt• AgeebrvsRb9le uvj 1 1.elNM R/Nr JOp• ype�lYAIAW FPLr... o.nB.RN.... rgvapgie6TAA.B,N .,•L A••+ ..Twee D....r INL. rW,r.l [e•U4 4�P +'ML•cd' .rR. rww1 n�.e epsRq Y.� Ame StJ1t E PLAN fffumiNAI NAP Part �fR[urtu 7500 YOR ASSISTED LIVIN EDINA, MINNESO- f'I..DP'I�:.. Overall Sit. Plan eee�� —rte rlRZr L1 — - — - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - — - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - --- 0 ---------- U El f , :-o < FFEWO 67 OUSTING LFE-855-02 a IF - --------------- --- :r ---------------------- 2D v 0 27 :E M f � P P R�UCiD - - - -- - _. p kEb I m I)OIR \e pcg� 77 knj R 7500 YOI ASSISTED LIVIt EDINA, MINNIESC C+ EBENFZEE L -- PAMGMI) GEOMEnuc FL&N C4.0 zl ni E' - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - I ------- PLAN IF w v 0 w 40' Ll - a) 19 N Em CONCRETE EDGE nIJ II :cum DR8a 6E89 N pKOPOS A PLI+tJ 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EDINA. MINNESOTA APPLICATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4124109 PAVING AND GEOMEMCMAN C4.0 w v a w AY SCALE T - 0 sID rocs A 8n TI. 6pADj,oC PON E; z -rC-% T : 0, . 'P.. T19 • FFE=570.33 EXISTING LFE=858.02 w v 0 27 w 1 720- P WN V., 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING V T-j L lyl f c Ali V=PLAN Piul" C3.0 FINAL DEVELOPMENT EDINA• MINNESOTA 4r24,09 El KQ 'Ell da ED ED STORM SEWER TABLE V T-j L lyl f c Ali V=PLAN Piul" C3.0 FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4r24,09 V T-j L lyl f c Ali V=PLAN Piul" C3.0 L' i •n.55a,.,o We GENERAL N+OTESS 3:F�1Y ww5 - NOTES CORRESPONDING TO EASEMENTS MS:. i.v °um.�w: } LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ++`.- "• +u•a •e •. vu..+e...n. +n�R � 7500 YORK .1.'"'^' ^'.'':s•^-° ASSISTED LIVING - - ,_... :.- �_ � �,A'NL?i� STATEMENT OF P08918LmE ENCROACXMENTt{`•�'n '�' a+.� ""C°w ®��'... ,'°' "•O'ry EDINA. MINNESOTA r ,• A `'' I J Oe ✓ Q •, ,r �'h a, •4f �' _ SCALE: I INCN w u FEET N. I fi'� ✓�.;' "fe � F +. � � �'� N •. 4 1�fiaTle-, »�: "`,RA _� I - -- I 1 h,. �.•• =:.::r �- ��...,r I �YX.. � - ,y I �]0.]Y 5 J]fi']5' X 509T.]•w i I I I en. w. ..... �,r ✓A ,'r + ✓� I I.. • ✓� ✓ '✓ �� I r I � o= 64]5":�.._....� 5 I 'y LOT 1 r' -_ rr �'r I 'r 'Y • _ I I 0L%Is 5 r? BLOCK 1 # I +a y,r ",; ^--� ✓ F C'a'" \ ` FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BOUNDARY • NOT FOR LEGEND TOPOGRAPHICAL CONSTRUCTION 11 ''�� -�� . - ° I • . -a, SURVEY _ 424/08 r L. EBENEZFA / 1w If -Ti`' 3 �� • \ � I , k-• I = - - -= TOPOGRAPIRC SURVEY \ \���� \,`, masartawrEn uH,vD f - •� \� -; \\ .\ \ i l� .ti,.. .. "u.. ,., ..1 I -oe...rnur+nwe . p 1 � III ,r� `�-,+✓ %1 -- *` I - - - - -- F 1. `I iii _,. ,.,. ,..,,... fifiXw,YYXfi•Y,w t I 1 ✓. ,- 1 I fl : = HENNEPIN COUNTY "E \\ S]y` 5 -✓r ✓r n .n .y I( 1 i I� . _. _ - -.. .. '� I i, Ir.` tl �: 14r✓ ' ! I�,I A , II wXY.s.wXXSOX 6-. VICINITY MP LAND SUflVEYORSIJ � `'-.. d ` '� d - I. .: fi o,5•u w r. ,_ —SAi n i. . �, o �• JI IQ @ •n.•••,w•� nuaa `lP ," ,t ,f, . ar`.,r ✓r ' + �YS"✓Yy— w.,' — 4a�+� • ; ,.. J -- aryl/ --1 - - - -- — �t -r Q i �! I`- f g + t= —�1-j_ -4716TH 'mod .v1.5. o ..1_- •rLL� 23,5• I �-�- ��2007440 YY�� C0.0 q^o -f Oct t,cnm m bx 8P uy -y r:,G•EG jp0" D W y �te ''7 79 - E 10 11 II X� 2" W. I— IT Ic. 1 omv X, Ilit X xx A w v o w 4w ld -A 51 j%",9'jW= • 1 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EDINA• MINNESOTA R t 2 9, L, I I . E ".1 •1; v. —Z7F JR- =vmr a= r&om-;r-- =ffzr APPLICATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4124/Dg DEMOLMONPLAN C1.0 C A R t 2 9, L, I I . E ".1 •1; v. —Z7F JR- =vmr a= r&om-;r-- =ffzr APPLICATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4124/Dg DEMOLMONPLAN C1.0 7,- P�PNG CONDMONS 11CAIT? MA i t Fi w w 0 47 w \ PABNLAUN AVENUE spo� �r. P. iun .wm 1� _.—_ — — — — - — — — — — — — Rif£R 10 PLAn'RHELT LI L)iOR MNTINO RAN PT00.wArlL)�' n'lnLLV THIS AAEA _ _ � — _ _ 7500 YORK j -. 1; !z, I l ASSISTED LIVING EDINA, MINNESOTA 1 : 1 "Lien. TrzFrr<css <uroa- ., i I 7.7 f0AMiL OF9TATI O.TE � r.LLLVne eoNeRPre PAO YNra — ua. ncno�'n RNTs'Ona ifluue--- --- -- RiLO LaurzuAr ns�oemnsml;rnoN. "'�- °-° 1 TFL 9]l- l61Ifd /� I P 1 iAlc:9]a]elal99 I• ..._- LB j IFINAL DEVELOPMENT L i — — — — - f srzidcnlAH APPLJCAT ON ', _- U11rm'cReIE PAD. I I I NOT FOR 1 I � ;� 1 - I CONSTRUC710N •••�' 1 I 924/09 � _ I. •i• tax \1� .-.\ ; - .. I . i -- _ ___ I 1 'o Overall Site 1 I .. ?•A I r L �: n� <A,E, Landscape 1 1, 1 LowiA ROOiiRimios S1 _ % 1, AH II•.II•CONCRE EP O I Plan 1 I I I LRT PLAN— TI- 1ioRRANRNO ------ - - --�` -- .. \ MAnmwmm MAREA OVCRA L1 1 LL SITL MN LI �•�. SW, 1- 40' � L F- ------ y I w a L :�, - -------------------- -p - - -- -- - ' - S� ".1` -� Iii 11 1'I �� 6°�.46��",.•'�'e..4".[yt.,�. ^+.Yh '� . � .t • r'`.':� . i - -'..� � 1 1 1 %.n � — I 1 ARG'A'lA \DSCAPE PLW Snlc 1 . ° I0' L F- ::I--_ L C, M-_�, NN ------------- P—A-- 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EDINA, MINNESOTA :Flik DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4124109 ------- m-_ Area "B" Landscape Plan L3 Scale le- HY P—A-- 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EDINA, MINNESOTA :Flik DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4124109 ------- m-_ Area "B" Landscape Plan L3 r W L 1 (\,\ iww m'gt4�01- �r. - RECEI efP FxK.YUU' oM Sf.P7500 YORK u�MXnsp. •P�upobur� ASSISTED LIVING EDINA• MINNESOTA 11. DEVELOPMENT I APPLICATION NOTFOR R 2 2009 oftlarge'ement d ^L bpi pe % 1_ t.. i �� , I , Plan SIEET 1 HL TORY COL'RTYAIID ---E L1lAROEARAT U u w : Scu1, 1/4'- 1'.0' s vLi L PI., ScW.I� W-JEEK23=30OF �WJIEIK33�E=� 111MWIM Mlmvm® IMK,MUE� Mw-m CITY TREE CODE REQUIREMENTS: THE PFAD(61FA Of THE NEW LOT ONLY 13 M70 U DIVIDED By 10- x I -T—Y TIKEE5 uqu—. THE TREE BREAKDOWN IS AS FOLLOWS: PROPOSED TREES: :10) ORNAMENTAL 29)C— —Y jf!)AaPNT "TOT PILANMG NOTES. I PUNT REQUI @ P L;t=G DETAIL -ALL PLANTS I AC ;7 P APR 7 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EDINA, MINNESOTA FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION Landscape Notes & Details —T L5 r VnRK D \ /FNIIF I I I I I I A /.�/1 CvllvwRVVVn rrL1� -- °____ _____ ________ n OVERALL SITE PLAN �\ '�Iy(./� . t• =eO'-0' � 9 x "' Y L H W W U) N E fD r W 3 lo�ov mir u®m rwal vra . w...c rt® v. Plmcmrq a ;'ry a.. 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EDINA. MINNESOTA ARR V am w EDWBOROUGN WAY n PARTIAL DEMOLITION SITE PLAN r =aaa L 7 I `----- 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING _MINNESOTA -4 f, 1 rIN3T: -.�,' r. ' � a , Tr [IN AL DEVELOPME APPLICATION , NOT FOR - CONSTRUCTION 4124M - it} • - _ o GARAGE PLAN - - - - -- - -- - -- - � -- -- ______ NOT-5 �. GARAGE PLAN 18,596 S.F. �7 .,� "^ . r- L QFIRST FLOOR PLAN 29.078 S.F. I . T T �-GT�AIV 5CALE M2 zz M PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN �-GT�AIV 5CALE M2 zz M L� L IIO1E iW fPAPWC QAf1IIT, RDOR RdW CFiE DI NON- 6TNDPF7'1 9G1LE W Y3t' . 1' -O'. SECOND FLOOR PLAN 23,115 S.F. 7riz- =t•-a t tr �rnm 1 in Si.FnPu.11menpl.c ga�MM 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING MIN& MINNESOTA FlNAL DEVELOPM APPLICATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION arzaas SECOND FLOOR PLAN �y A2.4 W THIRD FLOOR PLAN 23,115 S.F. NOfE� FOR GRdFMIC 0.,-,, , ! PLdF19 e!¢ DWUIM OT e NCN- 6TNOAfm fiCJ�LE 6 N]' . f•O'. ppR 1 4 2pC3 W I FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 17,892 S.F. 7/3P =1' -D' 1O1��xaxTN NO FOR GFdP41C LL-- RCCR ELMS 4 Ow l NON- STMD/.FZD S E a 3W • I' -O'. Anoouo I.c �i.PU�i�MMnw�+n. 7500 YORK ASSISTED LIVING EDINA, MINNESOTA ply ♦. NA L DEVELOPMENTI ,0. APPLICATION U NOTFOR ONSTRUCTION I ADS Y 2J09 4124,09 T._. g , 5 v FOURTH FLOOR PLAN A2.6 744 - - - - - - - - - - , -TC t � "I" Y R� of ;d. jfi ,Rio Rim ■ 00 Ila A W42 VA ■ on Own On 0 000 sop silo ® S$ �o A ag 9 OR 0,) ON *III ON ■■ aw'. nu ■ ■ I at ■ ■ r 7- 10 00 it io 0 EF w WALKER x(,00% yob K°%w Cq 1 Iaao�u +i,A fdSCm/:gE!CI L�Y�t'SCdo E175 `� /f 0 765311 C UNITS PER r-CRE ok e �y MEMORANDUM — Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: May 21, 2009 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer 4Z7401-_ SUBJECT: 7500 York Assisted Living 7500 York Avenue Engineering has re- reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and minutes from the July 17, 2008 ETC meeting. O A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as MNDH, MPCA, and MCES. O All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet C3.0: (These items can be corrected with the final drawings) Verify sanitary sewer services on both Parklawn Avenue and Edinborough Way by videoing, if the service line meets the approval of the building department then line existing pipe with a CIPP liner, if the service line does not meet the building department's approval it will need to be replaced. Show how roof drains and parking lot drains are connected to storm sewer system. Submit storm water infiltration calculations to Jesse Struve — City of Edina Utility Engineer. This is the first re- review of the new plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks A4q G:\Engineering \General\Y Streets\7500 York\20090521 re review of 7500 York Assisted Uving.doc MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, July 17, 2008 Edina City Hall 4801 West 501h Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Les Wanninger, Jean White, Paul Mooty, Steve Brown, Ceof Workinger, Tom Bonneville MEMBERS ABSENT: Warren Plante, Hilah Almog, Marc Usem, STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by chair Workinger. II. Comments a. Chair Comments Chair Workinger said he would like Commissioner Brown to brief the ETC on the West 70th Street/Cornelia Area Traffic Study. b. Public Comments None. III. Old Business None. IV. New Business a. 7500 York Avenue— Ebenezer Management Assistant City Engineer Sullivan said the proposal for 7500 York Avenue is to add 75 residential rooms (88 beds) to an already existing senior facility. Mr. Sullivan said the redevelopment proposal was applied for in March but was put on hold by the development team. However, staff and WSB reviewed the traffic study and made comments. The developers have since revised their proposal and incorporated staffs and WSB's comments into the traffic study and is seeking approval. Mr. Sullivan said the revised traffic study does not negatively impact traffic and staff is recommending approval. The developer's traffic engineer, Ed Terhaar of Wenck Associates, Inc., was present to answer questions. Commissioner Wanninger motioned to accept staff's recommendation "that traffic generated from the proposed 7500 York Avenue does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bonneville. Motion carried. All voted aye. tf (�-7 b 7300 Bush Lake Road — Minnesota Made Assistant ty Engineer Sullivan said the original plan was for an inflated hockey dour but it was change to a permanent building with spectator seating. Mr. Sullivan said mo of the trips to and m the site will be off -peak times such as early mornings and wee ends and there are no a isting operational issues at surrounding intersections. He said a proposal does not advers affect traffic therefore, staff is recommending approval. The (lowing is the Transportation Im ct Analysis Policy: The Transporta 'on Commission shall consider the following four effects ig,the evaluation of traffic studies \enan arranted by certain zoning, land -use, condit' nal use permits and final develop applications prior to the application be* submitted to the Planning Commiouncil for consideration: i) Does the developfica ntly affect the operation and con estion of the adjacent roadways or interseor result in a traffic hazard? AccordinTraffic Impact Study, no adve a impact to surrounding roadwayections shall occur from this evelopment. ii) Does the development signi i antly affect pe/traffi. ty? The Traffic Impact udy did nopedestrian safety. This is an industrial area with lift pedestriaiii) Does the development provide op ortunit ies d transit usage, vanpooling or car - pooling? The Traffic Impact Study di not a bove usages. iv) Does the development provide feasible or safety problem? There are no known traffic oq After discussion, the consensus was t at circu for patrons and emergency vehicles/ following modif pedestrian safel within the site. T The motion was proiect to meet All voted ave. V. Approval a. R 91 Commissio r I : and iv) N Minutes lar Meeting of June 19, 2008 to address an existing traffic issue issues at this location of traffic within the site will be challenging 2 A" 19 with was VI. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Bro, CommissioneN Brown reported that 6921 York Place and Street, receive preliminary approval last month. He sz month. Commissioner Bro n, chair of the West 70th Study Advisory Co mittee (SAC) meeting Presbyterian Church. He said working with developed to finalize a , ecommendation to t their review. After getti Council's feedba ETC and SAC. Commissi ner Brown said final recommendation to Co cil. •osstown Medical, 4010 W. 65th final approval is expected next Street/ ornelia Area Traffic Study, said the next is sc eduled for July 28, 7 -9:00 p.m., at Christ st and the consultant, a 17 -step process was he ouncil and it was submitted to the Council for , the 17 -step process will be distributed to the e anticipates two more SAC meetings and then a Assistant City Engineer Sullivalk said f the information for the July 28 meeting will be posted to the website and available for wirg in the Engineering office. VII. Open Discussion Commissioner White said the' Communities regarding a grant tliat tt approval. She asked what th . appli have been used for bike ails a Communities provides funds or alterr ket included information from Transit for Livable Engineering Department applied for but did not receive Lion was. for. Mr. Sullivan said the grant money would sidewalks. He explained that Transit for Livable i�a modes of transportation. In reference to the Transp rtation Chapte� they included two potenti I transit options t etc. He asked when will a studies begin will prepare a response or the next schedu of the Comp Plan, Commissioner Wanninger said iat will require feasibility studies to determine cost �d will the ETC play a leadership role. Mr. Sullivar. meeting. Commissioner Bonne I'll said the ETC shouN be concerned with the overall function of the City's traffic and the a are two significant projects that are- impacting the City, including the Crosstown, which s aff should be updating' the ETC on at regular intervals and therefore, making it public. Th next is the Edina Country Club for which staff can give progress reports when streets will b closed, etc. VIII. Adjournment Meeting adjourne at 6:50 p.m. M Page 1 of 1 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. a. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: IV. a. From: Jack Sullivan, P ACTION: Assistant City E veer Recom ® mendation /Motion Date: July 17, 2008 ® Discussion Subject: Transportation ❑ Information Impact Analysis — 7500 York Avenue— Ebenezer Recommendation: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Wenck dated June 30, 2008 and review a memo dated April 2 and July 9, 2008 from WSB and Associates. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that traffic generated from the proposed 7500 York Avenue does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: Staff received a draft Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) on March 17, 2008 for the construction of a new 89,700 sq ft assisted living facility immediately north of the assisted senor house building located on 7500 York Avenue. The building would have 76 units and 80 beds. Shortly afterwards the project application was postponed by the developer. However, staff and WSB review the document and comments and question from our review can be seen in the April 2, 2008 memo from WSB. As of June 30, 2008 the applicant resubmitted the TIA with a revised building size of 110,595 square foot and 76 units and 88 beds. All comments from the April 2 "d memo have been addressed in the June W' submittal. AYO G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\20080717_7500_York.doc WSB & Associater. Ina Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541.4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: July 9` ", 2008 Re: Assisted Living. Facility — 7500 York Traffic Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the revised Traffic Study prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc. for the proposed Assisted Living Facility located at 7500 York Avenue. The proposed development is located south of Parklawn Avenue between Edinborough Way and York Avenue. The revised development is proposed to include the expansion of the existing senior housing with the Assisted Living facility. The new building will be 110,595 square feet with 76 units and 88 beds. The revised proposed development is slightly larger the original proposal. Comments were made on the original proposal in April 2008. These comments have been addressed as part of the revised study. Based on my review of the revised Assisted Living Facility Traffic Study I concur with the conclusions and agree that there will not be any significant impact from the proposed development on the adjacent street system. Therefore, based on my review I would recommend approval of the proposed development. A51 CADO m6 and SatingsVsulliv \DmbopV.dEMO- whoule -070906.dw WSB & Assocfater. Inc Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: April 2" d 2008 Re: Assisted Living Facility — 7500 York Traffic Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541.4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Study prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc. for the proposed Assisted Living Facility located at 7500 York Avenue. The proposed development is located south of Parklawn Avenue between Edinborough Way and York Avenue. The development is proposed to include the expansion of the existing senior housing with the Assisted Living facility. The new building will be 89,700 square feet with 76 units and 80 beds. Based on the review of the Assisted Living Facility Traffic Study, the following questions /comments are made: 1. The Existing Conditions section indicates that traffic data was collected at the intersections during the AM and PM peak hours. It appears that these counts were in addition to those conducted as part of the SE area model project. A comparison should be made to assure that these counts are reasonable. There was also no indication if counts were also conducted at the site driveways. 2. It appears that the SE Edina area model files were not used for the analysis. These files would include "other" proposed developments in the area. The one percent per year growth should be added, in addition to the "other" development. 3. In the Trip Generation section there is no indication if the existing facility is full or if additional trips should be assumed for that facility? 4. The Traffic Distribution assumptions should be compared with adjacent proposed developments. A5o2 GAE.giaeering)GmerallY SvwsN750D YorN20080410_muc _Bicbark_WSB_MEMO - wbmlc-M208Aoc Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Jack Sullivan, PE City of Edina January 2e, 2008 Page 2 of 2 5. The analysis of the proposed access points does not indicate if issues arise between the proposed driveway and existing driveway on Edinborough way. 6. The Conclusions and Recommendations should be updated to reflect the comments herein. Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the Traffic Study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. 453 G:l EngineerbnglGenerellYStreetsl7500 Yorkl20080410_Chuck_Ri chart _WSB_MEMO- i+houle- 040208.doc ri Wenck File #2058 -01 Prepared for: Ebenezer Management Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 A5� Transportation Impact Analysis for Assisted Living Facility 7500 York Avenue Edina, MN June 30, 2008 u� Wenck Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................. ............................1 -1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND .................................................. ............................... 2 -1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................. .................:..........3 -1 4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACTS .......................................................................... ............................4 -1 5.0 PARKING IMPACTS ......................................................................... ............................5 -1 6.0 TRANSIT, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIAN IMPACTS ............. ............................... 6 -1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................. ............................7 -1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................... ............................8 -1 FIGURES 1 PROJECT LOCATION 2 SITE PLAN 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE i 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Transportation Impact Analysis is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed assisted living facility located on the 7500 York Avenue site in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the southeast quadrant of the Parklawn Avenue intersection with Edinborough Way. This study examined traffic impacts of the proposed development on the following intersections: • York Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • York Avenue /76th Street • 76th Street/Edinborough Way • Parklawn Avenue/Edinborough Way In addition to traffic related impacts, impacts to on -site parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and transit were also examined. The proposed project consists of constructing a new 110,595 square foot assisted living facility immediately adjacent to the existing senior housing building located at 7500 York Avenue. The facility would contain 76 dwelling units and a total of 88 beds for residents. The new assisted living facility would be built next to the existing underground parking ramp located in the northwest quadrant of the property. The project will include rezoning the entire property to the Planned Senior Residence category. The new building will have a full access point on Parklawn Avenue and a full access point on Edinborough Way. The existing access drive for the underground parking ramp would remain in its existing location. The project will add 62 additional parking stalls to the site. The project is expected to be complete in early 2010. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development will generate 12 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, 19 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 234 daily trips. No changes are expected in the trip generation for the existing senior housing facility in conjunction with the proposed project. • The intersections of 76`h Street/Edinborough Way, York Avenue /76`h Street, York Avenue/Parklawn Avenue, and Parklawn Avenue/Edinborough Way have adequate capacity with existing geometrics and control to accommodate the proposed development while maintaining acceptable levels of service. • The proposed access locations on Parklawn Avenue and Edinborough Way will provide adequate operations for trips to and from the site. On Edinborough Way, we do not anticipate any issues between the existing access and the proposed access. The low 1 -1 volume of traffic that uses each access point, combined with the low volume of traffic on Edinborough Way, will result in adequate operations at each access point. • With the inclusion of dedicated visitor and staff parking area, parking impacts for the proposed facility are expected to be minimal. • No significant impacts are expected to the existing transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities due to the proposed project. l -2 AS7 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Transportation Impact Analysis is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed assisted living facility located on the 7500 York Avenue site in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the southeast quadrant of the Parklawn Avenue intersection with Edinborough Way, as shown in Figure 1. This study examined traffic impacts of the proposed development on the following intersections: ■ York Avenue/Parklawn Avenue ■ York Avenue /761h Street ■ 76`h Street/Edinborough Way ■ Parklawn Avenue/Edinborough Way In addition to traffic related impacts, impacts to on -site parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and transit were also examined. Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project consists of constructing a new 110,595 square foot assisted living facility immediately adjacent to the existing senior housing building located at 7500 York Avenue. The facility would contain 76 dwelling units and a total of 88 beds for residents. The new assisted living facility would be built next to the existing underground parking ramp located in the northwest quadrant of the property. The project will include rezoning the entire property to the Planned Senior Residence category. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The new building will have a full access point on Parklawn Avenue and a full access point on Edinborough Way. The existing access drive for the underground parking ramp would remain in its existing location. The project will add 62 additional parking stalls to the site. The project is expected to be complete in early 2010. 2 -1 A;T - th ° ST. L i > 60 ST. J X O J Y C V H N 7 Z °o Y ° x ST, u 1 4 w CC Z O ° ° � o VrEvl + I CH OVIEN N vl z 1 61 st d S--. MORC J Y Rp a — CU RVE Q.: a W. 62 nd Ln ST. CT 4H W. 62 nd ST, i GARRI SON o %.-I� a w HERITAGE,' \V, 62 nd ST. 62 _ �4 > u > i m DR. W. 63 rd ST. 36, 'o a x 17 EL w o u ❑m W. 64 th ST, 62 r G > Q c ¢ lr• is 64th ST. ' u O 6STh ST. w 31 W. 65th ST. `\ -1 ST. m ,, 66th a, W 66 th ST. 53 '' `. , -- 22. W -RWICK PL. SOUTH DALE -..; ,•.... ' ,� ;�� 23. MELODY LAVE RO. d C w 24.NORMANDALE CT. CIR. W. 67 Th ST. U^\p' •: r O a 6B rh 25. LANT ANA LA. -NDALE ! . 4'r 26. NORM RD. v v �i F ORREST ft �FANZ ¢ 27. JOSEPHINE AVE. « a s W, 6B `h ST- DR. 4 R0 P I T 28. COLONIAL CT. `2 JUDS 0y u° 29, NORTH FIELD AvE. 30. R10GEvIEW i I A ti� = AVE. I ire 4'r z Li y� W. 69th ST. ST. O V J C v ° 70Th o > `" �%,Ji ' ST. / 1V. 70 Th a a w a a 5T. w a O z 1 )vER RO.�IIAVELL 31. HOLBGRN A \•E. W. 70%2 ih ST. Ew~ a� < �. 32. ROLF AVE. y z DR. RE LA o >o Y 33. RUBERTS PL. x W. 71st RICHFIELD ST. Ei J [ ° i HAZELTON HO' X ' W. 71' /2 2000 POP. 7R, 4Rf M o �, J pRE u = m 72 34, BIRCHCREST OR, ° ST' �� �?� p N, w. nd U 35. W. 63rd ST. w, 72r•d ST. Na�rR� c yP aST. 36. NANCY LA. I [ [[Si'pRTH F o , 0 u !y c 37. MILLER'S LA. - j I , w ¢ J Jr 3E Project z �J W. 73 th v Si. CLL DR. w n ° OR• z _ Location - N ILr OP.D DR. 0 u v Z v a wu 7 a O 6 I V W, Cr - 74 tIT c ST. C a u'Ar7KLAlYIV u C T. ¢` m % z H '' �. AVE. x u � w i 0 lV. a ` > > o z w a CL ° 75th z ° 0 r z a u T. A. J �yCiV P_AZA - Q e C�' DR. ` i W t O 0 uo 'e IV. 76th 1 ST. W. Ln 76th ST. = iZ x J O 32 z ¢ h c[ vi. 77 =J ST, ST. (L 17 0 E N z c N.INNESOTA DR. IY. 7gth ST. �n w � �.: SCUTY.TOWN ST. ° 0 o X87', S 31) APPROXIMATE SCALE C[k, k AMERICAN BLVD. 0 2500' BLVD. �7 � � m a e a vi u I a W. Blst ST. > ; YI, Blst 5T. Wenck TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN EDINA, MN Fh.f FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION I E >- r 0 cr 0 co 0 w PARKLAWN AVENUE WEST 76TH STREET TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN EDINA, MN 466. FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN w z w Y O } B N APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 920' 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site currently consists of an underground parking ramp used by the senior housing building at 7500 York Avenue. The project site is bounded by Parklawn Avenue on the north, Edinborough Way on the west, the adjacent senior housing building on the south, and York Avenue on the east. York Avenue is a four -lane divided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Parklawn Avenue is a four -lane undivided roadway east of Edinborough Way. Edinborough Way is a two -lane roadway which provides access to nearby residential properties. Existing conditions are shown in Figure 3. The signalized intersection of 76`h Street and Edinborough Way provides one lane shared by left turn, through, and right turn mov ements on the southbound approach. The southbound approach consists of one left turn/through lane and one right turn lane. The westbound 76`h Street approach consists of one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach consists of one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. Left turns operate on a protected /permissive basis for both 76`h Street approaches and on a permitted basis for both Edinborough Way approaches. The signalized intersection of York Avenue and 76`h Street provides one dedicated left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane both the eastbound and westbound approaches. The northbound approach consists of one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach consists of two left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. Left turns operate on a protected basis for all approaches. The intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue is controlled with stop signs on the Parklawn Avenue approaches. The northbound and southbound approaches consist of one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach consists of one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach consists of one lane shared by left turn, through, and right turn movements. The intersection of Parklawn Avenue with Edinborough Way is controlled with stop signs on the Edinborough Way approaches. The northbound and southbound The eastbound and westbound consist of one lane shared by left turn, through, and right turn movements. approaches consist of one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. Turn movement data was collected at the Parklawn Avenue/Edinborough Way intersection during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods in January, 2005. Existing data for the other analysis intersections was obtained from the City's existing conditions Synchro model. 3 -1 &I t 1 ! PARKLAWN AVENUE 1 �l (yqi•• � � o , ? APPROXIMATE SCALE F ' .r PROJE T LOCATION � • fit' .b ♦ ' I. Z ul 154 ` rL Z o + i .. ,1,� "• � fit._ - ( I �, W t• } Ir A r Ir -�• � { fU rr• I � I (' 11, � r �' r�Jr r � " °!. C PrC�. p� t �� fir" 76TH STREET te ivy' -;J � ♦ ... - T ' .w.. +. _�r: Sf• :�i.-_ `. a. .� . _:':C. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN EDINA, MN 46a FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.0 Traffic Impacts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2010. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • Existing (2008). Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. • 2010 No- Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by one percent per year to determine 2010 no -build volumes. The one percent per year growth rate was determined based on historic traffic volume information on the surrounding roadway network.- • 2010 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2010 no- build volumes to determine 2010 build volumes. Trip Generation of Proposed Uses Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the seventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation is shown in Table 1. Table 1 Weekday AM and PM Peak Hour Trip Generation for Proposed Uses Use Size Units Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Dail In Out Total In Out Total Total Assisted living 88 Beds 8 4 12 8 11 19 234 The Trip Generation publication indicates that a study based on national and local data indicated that less than 5 percent of residents at assisted living facilities owned cars, which were rarely driven. The vast majority of trips generated are from visitors, staff, and deliveries. The trip generation shown in Table 1 is for the proposed facility only. No changes are expected in the trip generation for the existing senior housing facility in conjunction with the proposed project. 4 -1 463 Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 25% to /from the north on York Avenue • 1517o to /from the south on York Avenue • 5010 to /from the west on Parklawn Avenue • 25% to /from the west on 76`h Street • 25% to /from the east on 76`h Street • 5% to /from the south on Edinborough Way The trip distribution percentages presented were developed based on careful review of the existing peak hour volumes at all of the analysis intersections. This basis results in trip distribution percentages that are similar to the existing surrounding residential uses. Therefore, the trip distribution percentages presented are realistic for the proposed development. Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. 4 -2 k4� C +---2/2/2 oCp M-- Li F- 104/1071107 7R 19 F- 113/116/117 j j- PARKLAWN AVENUE - - / -/3 T f* 73/75175 o M r c,) 57/59/60 57/59/60 -� o o -/-/2--+ En 7/7/7 ; o ; r- N cn Nru) ACCESS N r O Lo PROJECT LOCATION c a oCp '� 4/4/5 u� N F- 508/523/523 j 213/219/219 5/5/7 T f* 144/148/148 --1- M r c,) 11/11/11 -y -/ -/1 STAFF En p 29/30/31 � Q%1� cn Nru) ACCESS O Lo CO N_ Q Lo C7 O O m z W N r oCp '� 4/4/5 u� N F- 508/523/523 j 213/219/219 5/5/7 T f* 144/148/148 --1- M r c,) 11/11/11 -y Q-IQ 2/2/2 co r m tn 29/30/31 � Q%1� Nru) Werick 76TH STREET N NOT TO SCALE EXISTING 2008 2010 NO -BUILD FT2010 BUILD xx/xx/ xx/xx TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN EDINA, MN Or cc ti oCp -ti nto 161/166/167 IT F- 2/2/2 j y-- 7/7/7 39/40/41 T 2/2/2 I 29/30/31 � Q%1� Lo r iz O Lo co r- T w z Lu a Y !Y O r r '- FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES N 'q CD N 161/166/167 r *- F 562/579/580 ff �- 54/56/56 40/41/41 168/173/174 25/26/26 -y. o co C.) 0 r M� r co cl) a— co r- T FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES M co ccz °' c'' < <- 72/74175 j � - - 18/19/22 PARKLAWN AVENUE 2/2/2--l' T T 1791184/185 –� 163/168/169 a -/-12---+ 24/25/25 � a - CCD Lo M .— 443 f � N M O 0 w 0 m Z a W PROJECT LOCATION STAFF ACCESS ti r co 23/24/25 F 419/4321432 f- 78/80/80 32/33/35---t 1 T f-> 829/854/854 rn CD ,n 41/42/42 10 M M O Lo1`7 � M O �0. rn N Wenck F-- 112/115/116 .- -/ -/3 0 (n m -i m � 76TH STREET N NOT TO SCALE EXISTING 2008 2010 NO -BUILD 2010 BUILD XX/XX/XIX/XXI TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN EDINA, MN 46 cD co co MCO_ e (4D C ti - w�� 70/72175 2/2/2 -� 61/63/65 w z w Q Y 0 Mrnti N IC- i 17010 cD N ItT N clj 04 r mod] W N jIL> 156/161/161 918/946/947 1301134/135 -7� FIGURE 5 +-6/6/6 F- 0 /0 /0 f-- 2/2/2 ITf CD M LA � co M u') �co `* o t- 261 /269/270 <-- 330/3401341 .;- 55/57/57 ITS Coo (D to - C O _O co w IT WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Wenck F-- 112/115/116 .- -/ -/3 0 (n m -i m � 76TH STREET N NOT TO SCALE EXISTING 2008 2010 NO -BUILD 2010 BUILD XX/XX/XIX/XXI TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN EDINA, MN 46 cD co co MCO_ e (4D C ti - w�� 70/72175 2/2/2 -� 61/63/65 w z w Q Y 0 Mrnti N IC- i 17010 cD N ItT N clj 04 r mod] W N jIL> 156/161/161 918/946/947 1301134/135 -7� FIGURE 5 +-6/6/6 F- 0 /0 /0 f-- 2/2/2 ITf CD M LA � co M u') �co `* o t- 261 /269/270 <-- 330/3401341 .;- 55/57/57 ITS Coo (D to - C O _O co w IT WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Intersection Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios' described earlier during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. The existing conditions Synchro model was obtained from the City.and used as the starting point for the analysis. The existing model was expanded to include the Parklawn AvenuelEdinborough Way intersection, which was not included in the City model. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics, control, and signal timing. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service.(LOS), which range from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with very.little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation, with excessive delay for each vehicle using the intersection. Level of service results are shown in Figures 5 and 6. Overall, the analyses show that all intersections have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development while maintaining acceptable levels of service. Discussion for each individual intersection is shown below. 76`h Street /Edinborough Way - During the a.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS C or better. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the a.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. During the p.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS C or better. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the p.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. York Avenue/76M Street - During the a.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS D or better. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the a.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. During the p.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS D or better. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the p.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue - During the a.m. peak hour under all scenarios,. all movements operate at LOS C or better. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the a.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. During the p.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS C or better. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the p.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. Parklawn Avenue /Edinborough Way - During the a.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS A. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the a.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. E&I W7 During the p.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS B or better. No improvements are necessary at this intersection during the p.m. peak hour to accommodate the proposed development. Parklawn Avenue/Visitor Access - During the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the 2010 Build scenario, all movements operate at LOS A. Edinborough Way /Staff Access - During the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the 2010 Build scenario, all movements operate at LOS A. Adequacy of Access Locations As shown in the site plan, the proposed project includes two access points. One access point will be located on Parklawn Avenue approximately 260 feet west of York Avenue. This access will be used primarily by visitors. The second access is located on Edinborough Way approximately 300 feet south of Parklawn Avenue. This access will be used primarily by staff. As shown in the Level of Service analysis, both access points are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service. In addition to the Level of Service results, maximum queue lengths for the eastbound approach at Parklawn Avenue /York Avenue and the northbound approach at Parklawn Avenue/Edinborough Way were also reviewed. At Parklawn Avenue/York Avenue, the intersection analysis indicates a 95`h percentile maximum eastbound queue of I 1 feet during the a.m. peak hour and 31 feet during the p.m. peak hour. At Parklawn Avenue/Edinborough Way, the intersection analysis indicates a 95`h percentile maximum eastbound queue of 5 feet during the a.m. peak hour and 8 feet during the p.m. peak hour. Therefore, adequate space exists on both roadways for the proposed access points. On Edinborough Way, we do not anticipate any issues between the existing access and the proposed access. The low volume of traffic that uses each access point, combined with the low volume of traffic on Edinborough Way, will result in adequate operations at each access point. 4 -6 ied ;Z: 3 A/A/A aaa <-- A/A/A ,`- A/A/A A/A/A I T f A/A/A AIA/A --3, <<< a a a A/A/A Z3 6) a T (� r as ZZ C) & • 0 ED z 0 w E- A/A/A PARKLAWN AVENUE p' - /- /A A /A!A -� Q Q PROJECT LOCATION mQQ AWA m U U <-- A/A/A A/A/A A/A/A �` T A/A/A -� UU A/A/A Z3 6) UUa STAFF ACCESS n < IT! =a 76TH STREET N NOT TO SCALE EXISTING 2008 2010 NO -BUILD I 2010 BUILD XX/XX/XX/XXI 3 � a 'L- B/B/B aaa E-- B/B/B EJ f- B /B /B C /C /C <1 C/C/C� A/B/B aaa w z w Q Y O QUU a U U "L_ C /C /C a <- C /C/C - D /DID C /C /C -2` 1 <1 B /B /B B /B /B co m �j m m TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FIGURE 6 ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED V V P_.r1Cl� ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR IN EDINA, MN LEVELS OF SERVICE a =° c-° m m m m aaa A/A/A E- A/A/A f-- A/A/A PARKLAWN AVENUE <-- A/A/A � a 3 aaa +-- B /BIB <-- B /BIB B /BIB A/A/A -,' I T r A/A/A -3 C /C /C A/A/A A/A/A . m m m - /- /A Q Q C /C /C --> 13/131B 71, /B . a a a m m m aaa PROJECT LOCATION a Q 0 C a 11 +-- -/-/A n 4-IA STAFF U) Z Try ACCESS w Q d ¢¢ a` o c� O w O m z 0 w a m m '-- A/A/A mU0 m V o 'L-- c/c/c a 0-0 m <-- A/A/A m U o E- C /C /C EI �. Ly AIp✓A 76TH STREET F- D /D /D A/A/A -�` T D /D /D T B /BIB -3• ED 03 D /D /D D /D /D U B /B /B m m a Cl UUa 0UU 1 ...- Menck N NOT TO SCALE EXISTING 2008 2010 NO -BUILD 2010 BUILD XX/Xx/XX/ IXX TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN EDINA, MN A176 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 5.0 Parking Impacts The existing senior housing facility includes 133 on -grade parking stalls and 227 enclosed parking stalls. Access for the enclosed parking stalls is provided on.both 76`h Street and on Edinborough Way. The proposed assisted living facility will include 42 additional on -grade parking stalls and 20 additional enclosed parking stalls. Access locations for the enclosed parking stalls will not be changed. As indicated in the Traffic Impacts section, the vast majority of residents of the proposed assisted living facility are not likely to have vehicles. The majority of trips generated by the proposed facility will be from visitors, staff, and deliveries. The proposed site plan includes 35 on -grade stalls dedicated to visitors, with the remaining 7 stalls dedicated to staff. The parking impact of the proposed facility will be limited to visitor and staff. The proposed project includes dedicated visitor and staff parking areas. The overall parking impacts of this development are expected to be minimal. 5 -1 AV 6.0 Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Impacts Transit Impacts Existing transit routes are located on York Avenue, 76th Street, and Edinborough Way. Bus stops with benches are located along 76th Street at regular intervals. Routes 538, 539, 540, and 578 provide regular transit service to this area. The proposed development is not expected to significantly impact the need for transit service in this area. Maps of the existing transit routes are shown in the Appendix. Bicycle and Pedestrian Impacts As shown in Figure 3, sidewalks are provided along all streets surrounding the proposed project. The proposed project will include access,from the building to the existing sidewalk system. No significant impacts to the sidewalk system are expected due to the proposed project. ME 4 7a 7.0 Conclusions The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development will generate 12 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, 19 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 234 daily trips. No changes are expected in the'trip generation for the existing senior housing facility in conjunction with the proposed project. • The intersections of 76`h Street/Edinborough Way, York Avenue /76`h Street, York Avenue/Parklawn Avenue, and Parklawn Avenue/Edinborough Way have adequate capacity with existing geometrics and control to accommodate the proposed development while maintaining acceptable levels of service. • The proposed access locations on Parklawn Avenue and Edinborough Way will provide adequate operations for trips to and from the site: On Edinborough Way, we do not anticipate any issues between the existing access and the proposed access. The low volume of traffic that uses each access point, combined with the low volume of traffic on Edinborough Way, will result in adequate operations at each access point. • With the inclusion of dedicated visitor and staff parking area, parking impacts for the proposed facility are expected to be minimal. • No significant impacts are expected to the existing transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities due to the proposed project. VE A79 8.0 Appendix • Transit Maps • PedestrianBicycle Facilities Map 8 -1 Ar? + E 0 r- 0 LA W 00 BO Killebrew Dr 2 761h 76th St Be t;. 78 1 I I MVTA Routes: Uarget -J. Bu ka�v Ed noorougri. 9 -T nd C13 CIj Statia . 781h e s 3 :f 82nd St ricMd American Blvd 'in. ii > Southtow < o 77 Knox p 15 Cub r a`- Landing. —0 a- E -1 -112 L) z Q..R, 0 13 0 86th St X -iOxborq W� c1d Miles PENN LAKE Partners r. LIMES I Southdale Transit Center 5 I 6 62 Z 8 Metro Transit Routes: B BvLine Routes: R 12 Southdai tAerilage V -a 0 C Veterans um , W-T, m Hos M C P Passenger CD 3 3- z P Drop ON.—. U) 66th St 6 66th St Q Gate C ub P Passenger. 561h St . .4 7 76th St and p p!- Newton Ave S S P co 69th St 4 4) C 2iEll -0 - Target 5 -zalb C JR Cub M Bel-Ine Routes: IS I Z-1) G 0 D- 4 o ODD 67; LL P P rklawn —,z B BeLine Routes: Old Shako ee Rd. p FZ- 0 CD Passenger Southdal Drop ON - -i U3 8 Transit Center En Metro Transit Routes: 76th St and Gate C a) Passenger C, `70 rV X j C'i ✓ '31 Newton Ave S < 701h tit Pick Up 4; Metro Transit Routes: Co EV BeLine Route: c BeLine Routes: L 0) 73rd St SW Metro: :3 ;a-EN - Metro Transit Routes: id P 011 1 Q x Best Buy O 0 LL IDM c: Headqua ers 'Go, 761 S UWj BeLine Routes: Old Shakopee Rd. 76t 4 77th brew Or (Fm� Killebrew Minnesota Drive Minn ota din KnoxA en.0 781h Sl and France Ave S 2 rough Park V Cdlly 3 Rid MVTA Routes: Metro Transit Routes: 0 D @, E:' -" �j t " 28th Avenue E -:31 a 5 --�o -S..tht..n nd Station 7 z BeLine Route: 82nd St 5 A 0 1 134th St E Killebrew L a) 01 D, 86th St 66th x PENN LAKE L9 90th ST N 70 0 C: > 4 0 ro C J < W z 4; oQ 94 h-SL- a- Cm C Kenned 0 ormandale E x 0 a -Hir (D E , C �ol 0 Callm a_ S C a L ------ 7- elk 7 de ri. : Creeksi 981h SI Miles .1 Commun .1 12-- 981h S, enter D I rte 6 a South Bloomington 0) Transit Center N° man ale Jefferson x Vill ge High Metro Transit Routes: School 10 d BeLine Route: Valley 8 061h St Iz 0 Wes 0. -I--e 494 � otel 781h �i�c Target EU • r = Sofitel American Blvd c Bernd St Amenq ni Blvd 0 12 0 C per+, 0I a- ll 9 84th S1 F EL v5� /wl J'J - _rc]a 0 U LO - Hyland -°' m .� Lake Em ri Park Reserve J c Normandale Lake E Office Park 6 8500 �. z Office O` merican Blvgr 10 0 G CD Lit O N W E EZ .2 S —1 E 0 I.Miles 4.76tot L 771h St ,I I¢W'I America, Mall of (( I N 86th Sl 1 Minnesota Drive and France Ave Metro Transit Routes: 7 76th Street } o o Melro Transit Routes: a� a T T } o a a Fn a I o alz BeLine Routes: 7 73rd Sl Z Edina Dewey Hill C J0, 15 I 76th S � Edina y : ; B �ITST 7BO 2 4 4 - - Buy oo , 1 — ,_ Sherat n WliOnesola 1 14 41 P Picture Dr, a an Blvd 0 G CD Lit O N W E EZ .2 S —1 E 0 I.Miles 4.76tot L 771h St ,I I¢W'I America, Mall of (( I N 86th Sl 1 x 0 r- CCD 00 S Southdale LAKE Transit Center HARRIET Metro Transit Routes: ■ 50th St Miles Bel-ine Routes: N SW Metro: ■ For additional service, (D please see Route 146 I ■ 0) C Benton Ave 14 CU U2 -0'-N' 5 1 SON' U2 Colonial Way 13 CO 7 0 eritage ca E 8 65th 66th St O E 9 70th St 0 woo 1-5 < 12 tO 70th St LAKE :E _0 2- Ir OL Cn .9 z 2 Dewey Hill 74th E 0 0 > C CL 7th St 76th q� 78th St 18 --V 15 MinnesotalDr CO m O Minnesota Drive ira c,-,r >, and France Ave �ID 83rd Metro Transit Routes: 19 ighwood Dr 84th St 0 BeLine Route: 6 - 7) Hyland C: 01 -0 Lake Park C: iE5 MVTA: Reserve 0 L) z x 0 r- CCD 00 JPTY OF HpgeHG OND AVE WTUMACHENSLM • o A' 21, r1/ iW w 7.Tm LI DEwEY H RD ; t my 0, WiETnTE a. mile S 'No. 09133117 city of Edina --------- - lion Plan F ��Ow Figure 11 March 1999 Pedestrian /Bicycle Facilities A71 Concrete sdewesr SWM%Sk E03" ft* Palhw" Proposed Swit-AW P mosed S&a3I-BuzInmu Sft� Corridors on Hennepin County System' F ��Ow Figure 11 March 1999 Pedestrian /Bicycle Facilities A71 Draft Minute Summary of PC Meeting November 25, 2008 2008.0017.08 Rezoning, Final Development Plan, Lot Division /Final Plat and Variances Ebenezer Society /7500 York Cooperative 7500 York Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative are proposing to build a 76- unit,.4 -story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9 -story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. Of the 76 units, 47 units would be for assisted living, 16 would be of memory care and 13 elder care suites. Access to the site would be off Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. Parking would be provided underground, and within a small surface lot off Parklawn Avenue. Planner Teague explained the proposal before the Planning Commission is a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning, and uultimately, the proposal would require all of the following: 1. Final Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District to PSR -4, to Planned Senior Development District. 2. Final Development Plan. 3. Variances. A maximum': square footage variance for 14 dwelling units. A 3 -foot setback variance from Edinborough Way. 4. Lot Division /Final Plat. The site exists as two lots today. The lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. Planner Teague continued and asked the Commission to note in order to obtain the above- mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step . process. That process is as follows: 1 Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning. Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning is a review by the Planning Commission and City Council, in which approval simply allows the applicant to prepare a Final Development Plan. Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan requires a three -fifths vote of the City Council, but does not guarantee approval of the Rezoning, or Final Development Plan. 2. Final Development Plan and Rezoning. The Final Development Plan process is generally the same as the Preliminary Development Plan. A three -fifths favorable vote of the City Council is again required. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends approval based on the following findings: 1. The proposed addition is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. A'� 2. The proposed density is compatible with densities in the area. 3. Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing is a need in the City. 4. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 30, 2008. . 2. Sustainable design. Final Development Plans must include the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A5a —A5c of the staff report. 3. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. Appearing for Applicant Mark Thomas, Ebenezer, Russ Helgeson, 7500 York Avenue resident, Ward Isaacson, Pope Architects, and Charles Bassford, Notary Public. Commission Comments /Questions Commissioner Grabiel questioned the reasoning behind the "cap" for allowed unit square footage in the PSR zoning district. Planner Teague responded the "cap" on square footage is to ensure affordable housing. Applicant Presentation Mr. Thomas addressed the Commission and explained the history of Ebenezer Society and their outreach into the community. Mr. Thomas said Ebenezer currently serves 3,000 seniors and the 7500 York Co -op has a waiting list of up to 10 years. The average age at 7500 York is 84 years. Russ Helgeson told the Commission as a resident of 7500 York he has had to watch many of his friends leave their home at 7500 York when the need arose to transition to an assisted living facility, adding if this request is approved that would no longer be an issue. Mr. Helgeson said in his opinion if approved this proposal would be a benefit, not only for residents of 7500 York, but to the community at large. Continuing, Mr. Helgeson said the new building and additional landscaping will actually enhance the property. Mr. Helgeson asked the Commission to also note that many people who are interested in being placed on the wait list for 7500 York also ask if an assisted living component is offered. Concluding, Mr. Helgeson noted if this request were approved 7500 York would be more competitive. Mr. Isaacson presented to the Commission a slide show highlighting features of the proposed building. He explained that Ebernezer /7500 York Co -Op is proposing to construct 76 new units with a breakdown of 47 assisted living units, 16 memory care units and 13 elder care suites. Mr. Isaacson noted 7500 York is p 2 the first co -op in the State requesting approval to create a continuum of care for seniors in a cooperative housing setting. Commission Comments Commissioners referred to letters received from residents expressing concern over loosing their green space (if this project were approved) and noted if surface parking were reduced more green space could be retained. - Commissioners raised the following issues: • Will the new assisted living facility be part of the 7500 Co -Op • Will residents at 7500 York receive preferential treatment if the need arises for a resident to move into assisted living quarters • Who advanced this request Mr. Helgeson responded that the proposed assisted living building would function independently from the Co -Op. Mr. Helgeson said at this time details are still being worked out on the flow between buildings, land lease, legal description, etc. Mr. Bassford explained Ebenezer Society has requested an overall development plan to construct an assisted living facility at 7500 York. 7500 York residents would have to vote on the request. At this time, the land use designation for 7500 York is PRD, and a rezoning of the entire site to PSR is also being requested by the Board at 7500 York. Mr. Bassford stated in discussions with city staff a PSR zoning was found to be more compatible with the use of this site as a senior building and if approved, assisted living building. The rezoning would also bring the parking requirements into conformance with city code. Concluding, Mr. Bassford pointed out if rezoned a maximum unit square footage variance would be required. Public Comment Bruce Holman, 7240 Edinborough Way pointed out that this proposal also impacts nearby Edina residents that don't reside at 7500 York. Mr. Holman said in his opinion the proposed building is set too close to Edinborough Way. Mr. Holman said he is also concerned about his view being blocked and construction noise. Concluding, Mr. Holman asked the Commission to keep in mind that the YMCA is also interested in constructing residential units on its site, adding the increased density in the immediate area is getting to be too much. Bob Jarvis, 7500 York Avenue #117 told the Commission he is in favor,of the proposal as submitted. He told the Commission the average age of residents in the 7500 building is 84 years old, adding if approved,.the proposed assisted living component would keep 7500 viable, and the. next step many present 7500 residents could use. Mark Johnson, 7500 York Avenue #438, stated he moved to 7500 York a year ago and disagrees with the proposal presented this evening. Mr. Johnson said Aga 3 many 7500 residents will not speak up, but he knows many residents are worried about the noise this will generate, loss of green space and obstructed views. Mr. Johnson said he would like to see the age of residents permitted to "buy" into 7500 York lowered. Gemma Hessian, 7500 York Avenue, told the Commission she recently fell and realized how quickly things could change, adding if the assisted living component was part of the 7500 community she could recuperate and have physical therapy without leaving her community. Miss Hessian stated she supports the proposal as presented. Rob Grauman, Fairview Southdale Hospital told the Commission he supports the project. 'He added it is important to be able to transition from one type of housing into another as easily as possible. Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Comments A discussion ensued with Commissioners indicating that on the whole they support the project as presented. Commissioners' acknowledged the Zoning Board will act on the variances requested; with. Commissioners indicating their support for those variances. Commission Action Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion;. Aye's; Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Brown, Grabiel,' Forrest: Abstain: Lonsbury. Motion carried. Further Commission Discussion Commissioners indicated in the future they would consider further discussion, at the Commission level, on discussing amending city code unit square footage. requirements in the PSR zoning district. Commissioners also asked the proponent to reconsider adding a green roof, pointing out it may not be as difficult or as expensive as first thought. Commissioners also requested that if approved that the builder be respectful to all neighbors during the construction phase. 12/1/2008 submitted W 0 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 11 7) with all 24, 2008. 8) The property o connect the secon the responsibility Agreement was su Member Bennett seconde Rollcall: by the City Engineer in his memo dated October mu enter into a Skyway Agreement with the City of Edina to walkway to the parking ramp. Cost of the connection would be h roperty owner of 3930 491/2 Street West. The Skyway 4 to ap val of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. motion. Ayes: Bennett, Ho us , Masica, Swenson, Homed Motion carried. REZONING — EBENEZER SOCIETY ON BEHALF OF 7500 YORK AVENUE COOPERATIVE — RESOLUTION NO. 2008-127 APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Mr. Teague described the location of the subject site on York Avenue and displayed a picture of the existing nine -story, 337 -unit senior cooperative building. The Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the Cooperative, had made the application to build a 76 -unit addition to the existing building. He displayed pictures depicting the underground parking garage and proposed four -story structure comprised of 47 assisted care units, 16 memory care units, and 13 elder care suites with underground parking and a small surface lot. The request before the Council was for the preliminary development plan and preliminary rezoning which was a two -step process. Mr. Teague said, if approved, application. would be made for the final development plan and final rezoning from PRD-4 Planned Residential District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Development District. The property was currently zoned for an all -age facility, not strictly for senior housing. If given preliminary approval, application would also be made and reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals for a maximum square footage variance for 14 dwelling units and a three -foot setback variance for the building from Edinborough Way. He added presently the site existed as two lots so the lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. Mr. Teague advised that the traffic study conducted by Wenck Associates indicated the existing roadway system was adequate to handle the 234 trips per day that would be generated. The Transportation Commission reviewed that study and recommended approval. He reviewed the parking calculation and advised that the proposal was well within the senior housing requirements. Mr. Teague described the landscaping plan, noting a number of trees would be removed as a result of the addition but would still exceed the City's requirement. On density, a maximum of 44 dwelling units per acre was allowed and the proposal was for 36 units per acre and consistent with densities in the area. The primary issues were whether the proposed use and rezoning were reasonable for this site. Staff felt the use was compatible with surrounding uses, densities were consistent, amenities were in this proximity, and sustainable design was being proposed. Traffic would be supported by existing roads and the assisted living units would provide an opportunity for continuum of care. He noted the addition of senior housing may provide an opportunity for seniors that live in single - family homes to move to this facility and open the home for a younger family to move to Edina. Staff and the Planning Commission agreed that PSR-4 was an appropriate zoning district and the variances were justified due to the hardship caused by the existing underground parking garage. They also felt the unit size was reasonable but did recommend the City further study the question of whether or not the existing cap on the unit size of senior housing should be retained. On November 28, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report. The Planning Commission further recommended that the Council authorize them to examine and consider a zoning ordinance amendment regarding the maximum square footage requirements in the PSR zoning district. The Council discussion included: surface parking would be located on top of the existing underground garage to preserve open space and gardens located on the northeast side; 465 parking stalls were provided in the site plan; if this property was rezoned, most of the units at 7500 York would become Aq http: / /Www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl2008l2l6Reg.htm 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of,.11 nonconforming due to their size; and, a direct vote of the 7500 York Cooperative owners was required to approve this project. Charles Bassford, attorney representing the 7500 York Cooperative, stated the vote of the Cooperative had not yet been held but when taken, each unit would get one vote and 51% of the 337 units was needed for approval. Mr. Bassford explained the remaining issue to be resolved related to financing for the project and whether 7500 York would have to subordinate to any of that debt of the leasehold property. Once that issue was resolved, the membership would vote. Proponent Presentation Mark Thomas, President of Ebenezer Society, reviewed their 90 -year history as a faith -based not -for- profit organization that functions as an older adult services arm of the Fairview Health System for over 3,500 seniors. This location was the first senior cooperative in the Country, deemed the most successful thus far, used as a template for other projects, and currently had a 10 -year wait for certain units. Some time ago, the Board of Directors asked Ebenezer if they would add assisted living units. The average age was now over 84 years so they decided to move forward with this design concept and a market study was commissioned. Mr. Thomas stated an Ad Hoc Committee was formed and the process was rich in feedback from the York community. The planned business model was that the assisted units and 7500 York physical plants would operate independently of each other but programming would be aligned. Ebenezer would own and manage the assisted living facility and enter into a land lease for 7500 York. Russ Halverson, 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 208, stated that he had served on the Board of _Directors for six years, was President of the Board when the assist living concept was first considered, and Chaired the Ad Hoc Committee that was appointed by the Board to work closely with Ebenezer to develop the proposal being considered tonight. He stated that since its inception 34 years ago, the Cooperative had always been a leader in offering extensive services but was acutely aware that the missing piece in the program was assisted living. Mr. Halverson described the trauma experienced by residents, now more than 12 each year, who must move to assisted living, leaving their family and friends at 7500 York. The Board recognized the expertise of Ebenezer to develop such a program. Town hall meetings were held to share the concept with residents and after comprehensive presentations, more than 90% of those present favored proceeding with the project. At a monthly meeting, again about 90% of those present indicated they favored the Board's approval. Mr. Halverson conceded that with major building projects, some residents were asked to make a sacrifice for the good of the whole community. They were aware that some residents would experience change, which can be upsetting. However, the nature of the Cooperative was to do what was in the best interest of the entire membership with the understanding that some members have to be asked to make adjustments which, in the end, would bring good to the entire community. Mr. Halverson indicated that every effort had been made to keep changes to a minimum and as proposed, the landscaping and building would add beauty to the campus. He advised their Marketing Director had indicated nearly every person on the waiting list had asked if assisted living would be added and if not, they would explore options elsewhere. Mr. Halverson stated if approved, residents of 7500 York would have continuum of care to meet their changing needs without moving to facilities outside the community. Ward Isaacson, Pope Architects, stated the major design considerations were sensitive to the comments of 7500 residents to maintain as much green space as possible. He advised of the outdoor amenities that would be maintained, noted the impact of traffic would be minimized, described the views from 7500 York and the surrounding community to the building, and that the design would compliment the existing site and architecture geometry. He displayed the site plan and noted the parking was configured to maintain the green space. He described the access points from this facility and displayed a picture of the existing plaza, noting it would be landscaped, surfaced with pavers, and furnished to tie into the existing plaza of 7500 York Avenue, which was currently underutilized. Mr. Isaacson noted the one -story link into 7500 York and the building's step back design to mimic the architecture of the 7500 building. The memory care courtyard would be on the west side and provide a secure outdoor space, fire lanes were adequate, and they would maintain the walking path. He then W_ http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl2008l2l6Reg.htm 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 11 presented the four floor plans' and described what would be contained on each floor. Mr. Isaacson presented an exterior elevation, noting the building materials of rockface block, stone, Hardi siding, and stucco were complimentary to the 7500 York structure. A "fly by" video was presented that depicted how the building would be located on the site. In response to Council, Mr. Thomas advised that 7500 York residents would receive priority placement for the assisted care units and could receive outpatient rehab at the new facility, if needed. He also indicated they had studied the option for a green roof and found it may be cost prohibitive; however, it would be explored further. Mr. Thomas advised that they usually set aside ten percent of the units for residents who need financial assistance. He explained that Medicare and Medicaid do not cover assisted living. If a 7500 York resident required live -in or skilled care during recovery from a fall, they would have to move to a skilled nursing facility to receive Medicare reimbursement or receive home care services in their own unit to be covered by Medicare Part B. Mr. Thomas further explained the circumstances under which Medicare provided payment under Schedule B regardless of whether the client was in a single - family home or assisted living. Elderly Waiver provided payment through an agreement with the County and was backed by the State and Federal governments. The Council noted the height of 45 feet was from grade on the entry side to the mansard on the fourth story and it was 58 to 60 feet from grade to the middle of the peaked roof. In response to Council, Mr. Bassford stated the Board was comprised of nine members elected by the Cooperative for three -year terms in staggered elections. He indicated he was present at the community meetings at which a vast number of residents were present, a vote taken by raised hands, and the overwhelming number were in favor of exploring this option. The entire Cooperative of 337 units would vote by secret ballot once the outstanding issues were resolved. With regard to the cost, Mr. Thomas explained that cost of assisted living varied a lot depending on the unit and package selected and service components the resident needed. The monthly cost for basic services was $2,500 to $2,800, $4,000 for an assisted living environment and memory care units, and over $4,000 for memory care with medical needs. Jill Nokleby- Kaiser, 10326 Major Drive, Brooklyn Park, Director of Housing for Ebenezer Management Services, explained how the unit, level of service, and packaged services were determined through a collaborative effort of the nursing staff, family, and consumer based on an assessment of their needs. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Public Comment Mark Johnson, 7500 York Avenue, Unit 438, read a statement indicating many residents feel this proposal presented more disadvantages than advantages and requested the Council not approve the application. He stated those who attended the meeting and raised their hand thought they were just requesting additional information and believed the project had now been "steamrolled" along by Ebenezer. Mr. Johnson stated residents were requesting a town hall debate and open meeting to discuss this proposal because they were concerned it was being promoted by those who may be on the Ebenezer payroll. He expressed concern that the project would result in the rolling hills and Evergreen trees at the northwest corner of the campus being replaced by the new building, parking spaces, and garbage disposal area. He suggested the northeast corner would be more suitable for a building. Mr. Johnson asserted that looking at crimson sunsets would be a thing of the past and the character would change due to ambulance and police cars coming and going at all hours of the night. He indicated concern for safety and security due to new campus activity and additional vehicles leading to traffic congestion. Mr. Johnson stated he believed residents of 7500 York deserved substantial payments to lease this land; however, Ebenezer wanted free use of the land for the first several years. He believed this was not the right economy for this project and that some residents did not understand the cost to live in the assisted housing units was not covered by Medicare. Mr. Johnson also expressed concern that parking heavy vehicles on top of the parking garage may have long -term consequences. He felt 7500 York should be good neighbors to Centennial and Coventry townhomes and questioned whether A( http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl2008l2l6Reg.htm 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of ,11 they understood the true scope of this expansion. Mr. Johnson asked the Council to vote "no "..on the preliminary zoning and development plan. Robert Jarvis, 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 117, stated he favored the assisted living building on the 7500 campus. He stated he was a nine year resident, member and secretary of the Cooperative, and served on the Assisted Living Ad Hoc Committee. Mr. Jarvis stated he favored the proposal for personal reasons, benefit of the greater community, and for the future of the Cooperative. He felt assisted living would be an ideal fit for many couples to provide assisted living that would be close and connected with covered walkway. Mr. Jarvis noted the median age of 7500 York residents was 84 years 10 months, and 79 residents were age 90 or older, all living independently. Secondly, this facility would fulfill a need in the surrounding communities for an aging population. Thirdly, the potential for associated assisted living was essential to the future of 7500 York as a senior housing cooperative. He closed his comments by reciting a comment made by Barbara Murphy, Marking Director of 7500 York for over 16 years, who strongly supported proceeding with assisted living to provide a continuum of care. He encouraged the Council to approve this application for assisted living and memory care. Marjorie Sullivan, 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 531, stated .she had been a resident for a year and a half and while Barbara Murphy mentioned assisted living at the time she bought her unit, she was not interested in that service. Ms. Sullivan stated she enjoyed the beautiful yards and gardens and did not believe Edina had to build on every bit of green space. She felt there was not a "level playing field" for those who oppose the application and that residents should have had the ability to vote whether the Ad Hoc Committee was formed. She felt the Board of Directors was `but of bounds" when it asked for a raised hand vote instead of a formal vote. Ms. Sullivan stated assisted living facilities already exist to the north, south, and another project would be opening soon. She suggested that Ebenezer find another property for assisted living. Gemma Hession, 7500 York Avenue, Apartment 209, stated she had been healthy and independent until several weeks ago when she fell and needed a wheelchair and walker during recovery. She stated This was a new experience for her, having to depend upon her friends at 7500 York during recovery, so it occurred to her that having an assisted living facility on the property would have been perfect because the short stay beds and physical therapy would have been sufficient for her case. Also, her friends could have visited often without special transportation. She stated that as residents of 7500 York age, they may need additional care and it would be pleasant for couples should one need additional care. Gil Langseth, 7500 York Avenue, stated he was trained as a hospital architect and had worked 22 years as a hospital and health care consultant until retirement. He had been a member of the Ad Hoc Committee for two years and found Ebenezer had genuinely solicited opinions of residents, attended many of their meetings, been interested in feedback, and participated in feedback from the total membership. During one "marathon session" last July, Mr. Thomas presented all aspects of the project and again at nine consecutive meetings to stimulate questions, answers, and items of concern from residents. These meetings were well attended. Mr. Langseth stated when Ebenezer helped develop the original project over 30 years ago, the 7500 building was located in the middle of a super block. This created substantial green space, drives, and parking areas on all four sides of the building, allowing residents to live in a "park." Then, 15 years ago, the 28,000 square foot underground garage was constructed, resulting in loss of green space that was replaced by a gravel roof. Originally, the concept was to build the entire assisted unit building on top of the present underground garage to preserve green space but the building would have been only 60 feet from the East tower and considered an intrusion to those residents. Pope Architects very wisely located the building so it would more naturally flow with the geometry of the existing building. Mr. Langseth assured the Council that the location of the proposed building and exterior design were extremely compatible with 7500 York in terms of geometry, form, vertical accents, bay window treatments, and color. He believed that Ebenezer and Pope Architects listened to them and the proposed addition would be something 7500 York could be extremely proud of and a benefit to the community. /v http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutes /20081216Reg.htm 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 11 Dr. Esther Ruth Emdars, Chairman of the Finance Committee, stated she was interested in having more services on the campus that would help to compete with new buildings. She stated she served ea on the Assisted Living Ad Hoc Committee and watched them work with the architect to create completely new forms and buildings to address what they wanted. Dr. Emdars advised that 7500 York residents ask whether the assisted living building would be started in the Spring before they die, and they were serious because they know that type of unit was needed. She stated she hoped the Council would vote to approve the application. Robb Gruman, Vice President of Facilities and Guest Services for the Fairview Southdale Hospital, stated he was appearing on behalf of the senior management team of Fairview Southdale Hospital and Fairview Health Systems. He congratulated Ebenezer, Pope Architects, and 7500 York residents for putting together a project mindful of what seniors need. Mr. Gruman believed the plans, fine complement of services, and architecture were suitable in Edina, and assisted living would provide a continuum of care for 7500 York residents and the community. He urged the Council to support the project and see the wisdom of it as well. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh introduced Resolution No. 2008 -127, Approving a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning for 7500 York Avenue Cooperative with the following findings: 1) The proposed addition was consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east and west. 2) The proposed density was compatible with densities in the area. 3) Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing was a need in the City. 4) The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1) The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 30, 2008. 2) Sustainable design. Final Development Plans must include the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A5a -A5c of the staff report. 3) Compliance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September ,24, 2008. Member Masica seconded the motion. The Council discussion included: concern that consideration was premature because the decision was that of the Cooperative based on its bylaws, democratic structure, and process that had not yet been followed; question remained about the number of units represented in the hand vote; support for Ebenezer's work in the community; providing aging in place that was a priority for residents who testified during the Comprehensive Plan process; agreement that the 11.5 acre site could accommodate this structure; the proposed landscaping was attractive in creating rooftop gardens for 9th floor residents to view and generous in providing three times the number of trees required; there was good utilization of sustainable design and initiatives; and, the step down design and elevation created an interesting fagade. In addition, the application was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, the resident's average age was 84, the project would result in no traffic impact, and was within the density requirements. Attorney Knutson stated he had reviewed the resolution of the Board, but had not examined the Cooperative's bylaws. He noted this was a preliminary request, the first step in the process, and the final rezoning request cannot proceed until the Cooperative members actually vote. The Council noted there was currently a nonconforming use with the parking spaces and if rezoned, the parking would conform but the size of many units would not conform. The Council discussed potential consequences should the property be rezoned, but the Cooperative owners not support the project. It was acknowledged that the Council had received a secretary's certification on the action by the nine- Ale 6 http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl2008l2l6Reg.htm 5/20/2009 Dec. 16, 2008 Edina City Council Meeting Minutes Page 9 ofl l member Board of Directors elected by the Cooperative who determined to seek a site plan review for up - to- 76-- senior assisted care units. The Board- was asking the Council to take action on that application. A majority of the Council indicated a level of comfort in taking action on the preliminary application with the understanding the proposal would not be considered for final action without the Cooperative's vote results. Attorney Knutson reiterated that before the final rezoning was considered, there would need to be an affirmative vote of a majority of the Cooperative owners and Ebenezer would have to negotiate contracts, agreements, and a lease arrangement with the Cooperative. Member Bennett stated if the property belonged to Ebenezer she would support it enthusiastically. However, the property belonged to the owners of the Cooperative who were divided about the proposal. She stated she believed Council action at this point was premature. Rolccall: Ayes: Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. No one appearedNcomment. *AWARD OF BID — 2W9 POND DREDGING IMP STS -357 CONTRACT ENG 09 -1 Mot! made by Member Swenson an econded by Member Masica awarding the bid for 2009 P d Dredging, Improvement STS -357, ontract ENG 09 -1, to the recommended low bi er, Fitzgerald Excavating and Trucking, c. at $25,250. Motion carried on rollcall vo — five ayes. explained that in order to comply' Resolution and approved by four Swenson introduced Resolution seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, S, Motion carried. IVED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland State Statutes, all donations to City must be adopted by rable votes of the Council acc ting the donations. Member 2008 -129 Accepting Varl9ffs Donations. Member Bennett Hovland *TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT OF DECEMB seconded by Member Masica accepting th Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. seconded by Member Swenson, to reap pt Bd Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swens , Hovlan Motion carried. otion made by Member Swenson and Report of December 3, 2008. ring discussion, Member Masica made a motion, ner and Borhart LLP as City Prosecutor. OF 6504 -650/ss ARD CLE City Engineer /Pu c Works Director Houle explained it was necessary to St and Circle to access 6504 St dard Circle so Council action was needed to amend the eement. He indicated that suffi 'ent access was provided for emergency vehicles and ' ation was not required for the relo tion of a private easement. Member Masica made to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -130 A endment to Easement Agreement, Lawrence C. ia B. Holz. Member Bennett seconded t e motion. Ayes: Benn, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carri *CONFIRWATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member asica approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 4, 2008, and consisting of 21 pages; General Fund $386,328.35; http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutes /20081216Reg.htm 5/20/2009 Jackie Hoogenakker From: M P KELLEHER [MPKNC @MSN.COM] Nnt: Saturday, May 16, 2009 9:43 PM .,: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case 2008.0017.09.a Hi, I lived at 7420 Edinborough Way and my balcony faces East toward the proposed construction. I am not excited to think of looking into the of face this new building. Right now there are some very nice trees and hills of grass on either side and to the front of the garage entrance. Is it not possible to retain some of that park like feelling. Couldn't the building go further East toward York ?The drawing looks like there will be only a small set back. Since I am on the third floor the value of my condo is sure to be reduced for future sale but I doubt that anyone is going to reduce my taxes for the loss in value. Just wanted to throw in my two cents even though I realize it is probably a lost cause. Thanks. Mary Kelleher 5/18/2009 Jackie Hoogenakker From: LOIS RING [Ilydesigns @msn.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:35 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Ebenezer Society Plan I live across the street at 7440 Edinborough Way and I strongly oppose the planned building with entrance /exit on Edinborough which is the address of Centennial Lakes Village Homes - all residential. There will be added traffic with delivery trucks, other vehicles which will add congestion to this relatively quiet street. This entrance should be on Parklawn or York/Xerxes. What can be done to change the plans? Lois Ring 7440 Edinborugh Way Edina MN -55435 5/18/2009 Jackie Hoogenakker From: David Christenson [ddcmac @hotmail.com] ant: Sunday, May 17, 2009 2:15 PM o: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7500 York Ave. Ebenezer addition City of Edina Planning Department, As a long time resident of Edina and now a resident of 7500 York, I am pleased to register my support for the construction of a senior building at the NW corner of our property. Although there are other comparable housing units in the area, I feel that senior housing with the management style of Ebenezer will be a highly desirable. I cannot imagine a better use for that empty site nor can I imagine a more economical housing arrangement for the growing elder population. I urge support for the proposed senior building. Sincerely, David D. Christenson 7500 York Ave So. Apt. 229 Tel. 952.926.8984 5/18/2009 Jackie Hoogenakker From: BDMOLTZ @aol.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 3:04 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 2008 - 017 -09a Ebenezer Society /7500 York Co -Op. This is in regard to the Public Hearing Notice I received from the Edina Planning Commission for Wednesday, May 27, 2009 I live at Centennial Lakes in the building at 7420 Edinborough Way, which is directly across from the site of the proposed development. It appears that my condo is directly across from an area that will become staff parking stalls and a delivery/loading dock area. Wonderful! I am on the third floor and I have what is currently a lovely view of a grassy hill and numerous evergreen trees from my deck and patio door in my living room. It appears that all that will go away if this development plan is approved. Because of this, I am totally against this proposal. What is the point of a city zoning properties for certain uses if certain properties can be rezoned at the drop of a hat for certain property owners /developers? This is so similar to what the City Of Edina tried to pull with replacing Centennial Lakes Theatre with a high rise condominium. Please do not approve the rezoning of this property! Sincerely, Brian D. Moltz Village Homes at Centennial Lakes Condominiums 7420 Edinborough Way #6318 Edina, MN 55435 An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easv Steosl 5/18/2009 O e Cn y • j�cORPOR �'S�9 • .1888 Public Hearing Notice EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:00 PM Location: City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street .c CASE FILE: 2008.0017.09a TO: Property Owners Within 1000 Feet APPLICANT: Ebenezer Society on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7500 York Avenue, Edina, MN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Ebenezer Society 1St Addn REQUEST: Final Rezoning, and Final Development Plan Approval with variances PROPJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a 4 -story 76 -unit senior building to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, 9 -story senior housing development HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and or 2. Fax your views to the attention of the Planning Dept. @ 9521826 -0389 3. E -mail your views to jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us 4. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (952) 826 -0369 DATE OF NOTICE: May 15, 2009 Lie o e REQUEST FOR PURCHASE \•rH • TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 16, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III A 1. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Worker's Compensation Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Traveler's 1.$446,915 2. 2.$ 3. 3.$ 4. 4.$ 5. 5.' $ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Traveler's $ 446,915 GENERAL INFORMATION: Attached is a comparison of the Worker's Compensation coverage. Staff is recommending the Traveler's quote of $446,915, which is less then 1 % increase. There is but one quote, because the market is very limited for this type of coverage. Mr. Bill Homeyer will be present at your meeting should you have any questions. The Recommended Bid is within budget Administration Department not within byidgejr) Jgk6 WNlin,KVIance Director Hughes, City kA nager City of Edina Worker's Compensation Premiums 2008 2009 League of MN $5135653 (Quote) Travelers $426,905 $4465915* *payroll increased from 2008 by 3.5% Experience Modification increased from 1.00 to 1.24 o e ia 8e TO: FROM VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 16, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III A 2 ITEM DESCRIPTION: General Liability Insurance Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Traveler's 1.$338,105 2. 2.$ 3. 3.$ 4. 4.$ 5. 5.$ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Traveler's $ 338,105 GENERAL INFORMATION: Attached you will find a premium comparison for the various liability overages that are contained in the City's liability insurance package. Included in that comparison are the quotes for 2009 -10. The increase for the coming year is less then 1 % and the Staff recommends that the City accept the quote of $338,105. . Traveler's is the only quote that is presented, because of the limited market for this type of coverage. Mr. Bill Homeyer will be present if you should have questions. Signature The Recommended Bid is K within budget not within b Administration Department Hughes, City in, FinanA Director City of Edina Premium Comparison Auto Physical Damage $14,549 $12,045 $11,801 7,759 TOTAL $430,887* $393,145* $336,940* 338,105* *Includes terrorism coverage charges of $3,762 in 2006; $4,248 in 2007 $4,044 in 2008; and $5,000 in 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009 Equipment $11,391 $12,069 $10,067 10,514 Values of $2,465,569 in 2006 Values of $2,613,174 in 2007 Values of $2,575,200 in 2008 Values of $2,543,583 in 2009 General Liability & Liquor $179,877 $160,775 $122,078 119,496 Employee Benefit Liability $343 $343 $343 343 Law Enforcement Liability $70,196 $86,688 $76,159 82,718 Employment Practices Liability $25,577 $26,412 $22,443 22,854 Public Entity Management Liability $6,601 $7,346 $6,730 6,218 Auto Liability $122,353 $87,467 $87,319 88,203 . Auto Physical Damage $14,549 $12,045 $11,801 7,759 TOTAL $430,887* $393,145* $336,940* 338,105* *Includes terrorism coverage charges of $3,762 in 2006; $4,248 in 2007 $4,044 in 2008; and $5,000 in 2009 Cn \roR�B REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 16, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III A 3 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Property Insurance Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Traveler's 1.$ 75,966 2. Affiliated FM 2.$ 76,542 3. The Hartford 3.$ 78,781 4. Chubb 4.$ 77,233 5. 5.$ RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Traveler's $ 75,966 GENERAL INFORMATION: Attached is the pricing for renewal of the City's property insurance. Please notice the rate is going down, but because of the purchase of an additional house for the East Edina Housing Foundation, and a change in the valuation of the Golf Dome, plus the addition of the new Public Works Building the amount of property the City is insuring is increasing, this is the reason for the increase in the total premium. The increase is less then 1 %. Staff recommends Travelers quote of $75,966. Mr. Jack Carroll will be present should you have questions. / Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not Administration Department N ty91�1 o e III. Pricing Property Proposal July 1, 1009 Carrier Expiring 2008 2009 Renewal 2009 Option Affiliated FM 2009 Option The Hartford 2009 Option Chubb Travelers Travelers Rating Basis (Property): $99,653,601 $108,722,324 $108,722,324 $108,722,324 $108,722,324 Rate (Property): .0719/$100 .06981100 .0704/$100 .0724/$100 .0710/$100 Estimated Annual Property Premium: $71,743 $75,966 $76,542 $78,781 $77,233 Boiler & Machinery Premium: Included Included Included Included Included Marine Premium: Included Included Included Included Included Crime Premium: Included Included Included Included Included Total Estimated Package Premium $71,743 $75,966 $76,542 $78,781 $77,233 i Payment Plan with Travelers — 25% down, 9 equal payments — no interest c:\documents and settings \crosmith \my documents \09 property proposal.doc Presentation Date: 7/02/08 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D: Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 16, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction: Contract No. ENG 09 -11 rovement Nos. BA -357. SS -445, STS -352, W M -487 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 11 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE June 9, 2009 Company 1. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 2. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 3. Palda & Sons, Inc. 4. Valley Paving, Inc. 5. 'GMH Asphalt Corporation 6. Hardrives, Inc. 7. C.S. McCrossan Constr. Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Midwest Asphalt August 9, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 1,586,586.38 $ 1,634,892.23 $ 1,642,880.24 $ 1,694,560.60 $ 1,742,685.90 $ 1,763,225.97 $ 2,257,317.70 $1,586,586.38 (Schedule A&C) GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for street and utility improvements throughout St. John's Park Neighborhood. The project includes reconstructing the existing roadways, adding curb and gutter, rehabilitating the sanitary sewers and watermain and upgrading the storm sewer systems. The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the May 5, 2009, Public Hearing. This project will. be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. The Feasibility Study overall construction estimate was $2,236,800. Staff recommends awarding the project to Midwest Asphalt. i The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works — Engineering Hughes, nce Director GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2009 \ENG 09 -11 St. John's Park Mood RecoMADMIN\MISC\ENG 09-11 RFP.doc /1�1r'rL, o e AQ v �J \., REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 16, 2009 AGENDA ITEM 1I1. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Bredesen Park Pathway, Braemar Golf Course Parking Lot, Highlands Park Parking Lot and Edinborough Park Entryway and Sidewalk Renovations. DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE May 27, 2009 July 27, 2009 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Bituminous Roadways 1. $319,421.00 2. Midwest Asphalt 2. $343,391.25 3. Northwest Asphalt 3. $356,433.00 4. Veit & Company, Inc. 4. $361,722.50 5. Ace Blacktop, Inc. 5. $367,636.00 6. GMH Asphalt Corp. 6. $377,661.25 7. Barber Construction, Inc. 7. $379,420.00 8. Hardrives, Inc. 8. $399,754.75 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bituminous Roadways $319,421.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: On May 27, 2009, bids were opened for the renovation of Bredesen Park pathway, Braemar Golf Course parking lot, Highlands Park parking lot, Edina Art Center parking lot and Edinborough Park asphalt entryway and sidewalk. The bid package was structured in a manner that allows the City the right to accept or reject any number of the independent projects as well as reduce the scope of each individual project. The strategy was to bid them together to capture economies of scale. Bituminous Roadways submitted the following bid per project: Bredesen Park Pathway $174,470.00 Braemar Golf Course Parking Lot $87,067.50 Edina Art Center Parking Lot $36,082.50 Edinborough Park Entryway and Sidewalk $34,293.75 Highlands Park Parking Lot $23,589.75 GRAND TOTAL $355,503.50 -page 2 of 2- It is staff's recommendation to not accept the Edina Art Center parking lot renovation bid because there is currently not adequate funding available in the Capital Improvement Plan to cover this expense. By eliminating the Edina Art Center parking lot project cost of $36,082.50, the total bid comes to $319,421.00. It is staff intention to request funding in the 2010 CIP to cover the cost of the Art Center parking lot renovation project on a reduced scale by restructuring specifications and completing some of the parking lot retaining wall work with internal staff. The competing quotes shown above do not include their quote to renovate the Edina Art Center parking lot. The Highlands Park parking lot project is currently a 2010 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) project budgeted at $50,000.00; however, staff is recommending that the project be completed this year for a number of reasons. The parking lot is in very poor condition and is in our opinion needs to be renovated in 2009. The bidding environment for these projects is considered favorable at this time. The Bredesen Park pathway project is a 2009 CIP projected budgeted at $250,000; however, the bid came in at $75,530.00 under budget. Therefore, staff recommends that the Highlands Park parking lot project funding be covered under the excess funding earmarked for the Bredesen Park pathway. The Braemar Golf Course parking lot project is a 2009 CIP project currently funded at $75,000; however, specifications were written in such a manner that the project can and will be reduced in scope to bring the project within the $75,000 CIP budget. Additional CIP funding will be requested in the golf course's proposed 2010 CIP to cover the shortfall and complete phase two of the parking lot renovation project. The Edinborough Park sidewalk and entryway project is a 2009 CIP project budgeted at $25,000; however, the bid came in at $34,293.75. Edinborough Park is experiencing significant concrete sidewalk deterioration to a point of it being a hazardous condition. Thankfully, the 2009 CIP Edinborough Park Air - Handling Unit Replacement project came in $110,500 under budget. Staff recommends award of bid to Bituminous Roadways for $319,421.00. John Key6cfs, Director The Recommended Bid is within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department not within budget Jo Wallin, Finance Director Z (-- Gordon Hughes, City M ager See +6 GL%,�, L) c 01"" -file po A c, n REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item N.A. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: June 16, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Action ® Motion Donations ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-56 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to Edina Art Center: Michael Whitt, Sustaining Member John Horn, Sustaining Member Lillian H. Indeck Jane Schmechel Kate Javens Vaness Greene Donations to Braemar Memorial Fund: Cahill Financial Advisors Daniel Moran Dated: June 16, 2009 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk $100.00 $100.00 $30.00 Assorted Pens & Roll of Craft Paper American Beasts Art Book, 2 Pad Marker Paper, Pottery for Edina Art Fair Sales $50.00 $100.00 1 Pad Watercolor Paper James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June16, 2009 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and.seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 (A O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: June 16, 2009 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for June 3, 2009. Recommendation: Agenda Item IV. B. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, June 3, 2009. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, June 3, 2009 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 3, 2009. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, Police Traffic Sergeant and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 16, 2009, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Request on which staff recommends approval: 1. Request for a "No Parking — Pick -Up and Drop -Off Only" zone in front of 4640 Edgebrook Place. The requestor is the homeowner at 4640 Edgebrook Place. She states that her husband has become severely handicapped and must use a walker or a wheel chair. Her husband is an extremely large individual making his transportation even more difficult. Edgebrook Place is an extremely narrow street with parking restricted on one side. Requestor states that many times, especially now during road reconstruction, cars are parked in front of her house making the transportation of her husband extremely difficult. He will soon be confined entirely to the wheel chair and will require a Metro Mobility bus to transport him. The requestor states that, should this request be granted, she will notify staff immediately when the signs are no longer needed. A "No Parking — Pick -Up and Drop -Off Only" zone is consistent with current city policy. Staff recommends the approval of the request for a "No Parking — Pick -Up and Drop -Off Only" zone in front of 4640 Edgebrook Place. Traffic Safety Staff Review June 3, 2009 Page 1 of 2 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \09 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 06 -03 -09 SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request. None for Wednesday, June 3, 2009 meeting. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request for some type of traffic calming on the 4000 block of Sunnyside Road. 2. Request for a stop sign for east bound Benton Avenue at West Normandale Road (Valley View Road) making this an all -way stop intersection. Request for "Resident Parking Only" signs at 5844 Brookview Avenue. Traffic Safety Staff Review June 3, 2009 Page 2 of 2 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \09 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 06 -03 -09 Dale 9 • f�CORPOPA��/ leee AGENDA ITEM: IV. C. CHOWEN PARK GARDEN No packet data - Continued to 7121109 1-1 Oral presentation ❑ Information coming r� To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: Jtme 16, 2009 Subject: Grant for Morningside bungalow study. Recommended Action: REPORURECOMMEN DATION Agenda Item IV.D Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Enter into the attached Certified Local Government Agreement. The agreement outlines the federal requirements necessary for the implementation of the grant to study the Morningside bungalows. Information/Background The following documents are attached: • A cover letter from the Minnesota Historical Society regarding the grant. • The Certified Local Government Agreement. This includes the documents that must be filled out in order to receive funds after work has been completed. • A description of the project, which was used in the application for the grant. • Resolution. / Minnesota ll 14 Historical Society May 20, 2009 Joyce Repya City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: F.Y. 2009 Certified Local Government Grant Agreements Federal Grant Number: 27 -09- 21829.008 Dear Ms. Repya: Enclosed please find a set of agreements for the city's Certified Local Government (CLG) grant in the amount of $5,000 for a multiple property study for Morningside bungalows approved on April 1, 2009. Enclosed are three blue -bound copies of your Certified Local Government Agreement. The Agreement outlines the federal requirements necessary for the implementation of the grant. Carefully review Attachment A that outlines your project in detail. Your Agreement also includes the U.S. Department of Interior Civil Rights Assurance Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters, Drug Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying (pages seven through nine). If the Agreement is acceptable, please have the three blue bound copies signed on paces six and nine. These copies should be returned to the Grants Office. A fully executed copy will be returned to you for your files. Please note that a brief monthly report is due in the Grants Office by the 15th of each month for the duration of the project period (see Attachment A and 2009 CLG Grants Manual Appendix F). This brief form should take no longer than a few minutes to complete each month. It greatly facilitates the tracking of the progress of the projects. Should you have any questions or concerns about the award or the agreement, please do not hesitate to call me at 651- 259 -3458. Thank you. Sincerely, I A �-- Mandy Skypala Grants Specialist enclosures Minnesota Historical Society, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 651- 259 -3000 • 888 - 727 -8386 • www.mnhs.org MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT AGREEMENT ACCOUNT FISCAL OBJECT FEDERAL PROJECT DOLLAR AMOUNT NUMBER YEAR CODE NUMBER 00284 2009 5260 27 -09- 21829.008 $5,000 HPF grant funds $5,000 applicant match This Agreement is made by and between the Minnesota Historical Society hereinafter called the Society), and the City of Edina (hereinafter called the City), pursuant to authority granted by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Society has been allocated funds by the United States Department of the Interior for use by Certified Local Governments ,for qualifying historic preservation activities; and WHEREAS, the City has applied for and been granted Certified Local Government Status and has made application for Certified Local Government funds to be utilized in carrying out the project described in Attachment A of this Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of and in reliance upon the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto do covenant and agree, each for themselves and their respective successors and, assigns, to carry out the project under the following provisions.- I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. The Project Time Period, Work Summary, Photograph Guidelines (where applicable), Consultations and Progress Reports, Final Products, Project Director's Report, Project Budget, and Reimbursement Schedule are described in the Project Description, Attachment A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. r B. The City agrees the project will be carried out as described in the Project Description, unless modified pursuant to the provisions of Section V of this contract. C. The Society will reimburse the City for the budget costs identified as Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) federal dollars in the Project Description, following submittal of materials as described in Section III of this Agreement. Final products which do not conform to the terms and conditions of this Agreement or which do not meet the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards will not be reimbursed. CLG Grant Agreement 11. ASSURANCES A. The City assures that all work carried out on this project will conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983) and that the project personnel meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983) as stipulated in the Project Description. B. The City assures that this project will be administered and conducted in accordance with the following: OMB Circular A -87 "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Government" and OMB Circular A -102 (revised) "Uniform Requirements for Assistance to State and Local Governments." 2. Department of the Interior regulations 43 CFR Part 12, Subpart C - "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments." a. In addition to the requirements of these regulations the City will allow a minimum of two weeks between the date bid solicitations are published and the date bidders must respond; and allow eighteen calendar days be- tween the date invitations are mailed to potential bidders and the date bidders must respond. 3. Public Law 101 -517, Title V, Section 511, states: When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal money, all grantees receiving Federal funds, including but not limited to State and local governments, shall clearly state (1) the percentage of the total costs of the program or project which will be financed with Federal money, (2) the dollar amount of Federal funds for the project or program, and (3) percentage and dollar amount of the total costs of the project or program that will be furnished by nongovernmental sources. 4. The "Single Audit Act of 1984." 5. Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) Grants Manual (previously known as National Register Programs Guideline NPS -49). C. The City acknowledges that this project is being supported, in part, with funds from the United States Department of the Interior. As a condition of receiving such funds, the City assures compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975. Page 2 CLG Grant Agreement The City also agrees as follows: In the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work hereunder, no contractor, material supplier or vendor shall, by reason of race, creed or color, discriminate against any person or persons who are citizens of the United States, or resident aliens, who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. No contractor, material supplier or vendor shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in the preceding paragraph, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed or color. The violation of this section is a misdemeanor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. This Agreement may be canceled or terminated by the Society, and all money due, or to become due hereunder may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms of this section. D. The City will indemnify and save and hold the Society and the Department of the Interior harmless from any and all claims or causes of action arising from the performance of this project by the City. E. The City agrees to make repayment of.grant funds to the Society if terms and conditions of this Agreement are not followed or costs claimed are subsequently disallowed. F. The City, in accordance with provisions of 18 USC 1913 regarding lobbying, assures that no part of grant budget will be used directly or indirectly or to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device intended or designed to influence in any manner a member of Congress, to favor or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation. This shall not prevent communicating to members of Congress on the request of any member or to Congress, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the'public business. G. The City agrees any publications, studies, reports, presentations, films, audio visual materials, exhibits, or other material prepared with grant assistance will contain an acknowledgment of HPF grant funds and nondiscrimination policy as follows: "The activity that is the subject of this (type of publication) has been financed (in part/entirely) with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U. S. Page 3 CLG Grant Agreement Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. "This program receives. Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U. S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20240." H. The City assures that transferred federal monies will not be applied as part of the matching (applicant) share, and that monies used as match on other federal grants will not be used as matching (applicant) share on this project. r I. The City agrees not to contract with any party which is debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension. Current lists of such parties are on file in the Society's Grants Office and are available for review by the City. As a condition of this Agreement, the City shall complete and execute the attached Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and other Responsibility Matters, Drug -Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying (see page 7 -9). III. REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES A. Payments under this Agreement will be made on a reimbursable basis according to the schedule included in the Project Description (see Attachment A). All supporting fiscal documentation must be submitted prior to reimbursement. B. A Request for Reimbursement must include the following: 1 Request for Reimbursement Form (see Attachment B). 2. Supporting fiscal documentation for all project costs during the period covered by the request, including both federally funded items and applicant match items. (See Attachment C for Information on Allowable Costs.) If project work begins prior to September 30, and the City wishes to claim these costs, a Request for Reimbursement must be submitted at the end of the federal fiscal year. Applicant match must be equal to, or may exceed, the federal funds requested as of September 30 (also see Reimbursement Schedule of Attachment A). Page 4 CLG Grant Agreement 4. Final Product(s) and the Project Director's Report are to be submitted with the Final Request for Reimbursement Form (see Attachment A). C. The Request for Reimbursement Forms should be submitted to Mandy Skypala, Minnesota Historical Society, Grants Office, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1906. D. When both the financial documentation and the product documentation has been found to be acceptable by the Society, funds will be requested from the Department of the Interior and will be forwarded to the City when the funds have been received by the Society. IV. AUDIT The City must submit a copy of all audited financial statements completed pursuant to OMB Circular A -133 for all fiscal years which include the project period. These must be submitted to Monica Zarembski, Minnesota Historical Society, Finance Office, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1906, within 120 days of their completion. V. AMENDMENTS AND CANCELLATION A. Amendments Any significant variations from the approved work summary, products, budget, and performance /reporting milestones described in Attachment A which are experienced or anticipated during the course of the project and any significant problems, delays, or adverse conditions which materially affect planned performance should be submitted in writing to Mandy Skypala, Minnesota Historical Society, Grants Office, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102 -1906. The Society will respond in writing, either approving or not approving the changes, and may amend the contract if deemed necessary. The City is aware that some changes may require approval by the National Park Service and agrees to submit any necessary changes as early as possible during the project period. Variations which are not known until the conclusion of the. project may be submitted with the final Request for Reimbursement; however, the City understands that costs may be disallowed if changes are not approved. 2. If any part of the budgeted federal grant funds will not be used, the City must notify the Society at least sixty (60) days before the project's ending date. Failure of the City to notify the Society may result in the loss of federal funds to the state, and may have an adverse effect on future applications for CLG funds by the City. B. Cancellation. The Society reserves the right of termination for cause on a thirty (30) day notice should it be determined that the City has failed to materially comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement may Page 5 CLG Grant Agreement also be terminated when both parties agree that the project will not produce beneficial results commensurate with further expenditure of funds or because of circumstances beyond the control of the Society and/or the City. In the event of termination, the City may be reimbursed for eligible expenses incurred prior to termination or by a negotiated settlement. Once this Agreement is signed, it controls all activities during the project time period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the date(s) indicated below intending to be bound thereby. Minnesota Historical Society City of Edina 345 Kellogg Boulevard West 4801 West 50th Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Edina, MN 55424 Nina M. Archabal, Director and (date) signature (authorized official) (date) State Historic Preservation Officer (print name) Britta L. Bloomberg (date) (signature -City Clerk or City Manager) (date) Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer (print name) Kathryn Ludwig (date) (signature - HPC Chairperson) (date) Contracting Officer (print name) Page 6 U.S. Department of the Interior Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters, Drug -Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying Persons signing this form should refer to the regulations referenced below for complete instructions: Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions - [The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled, "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. See below for language to be used; use this form for certification and sign; or use Department of the Interior Forth 1954 (Dl- 1954). See Appendix A of Subpart D of 43 CFR 12. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions - (See Appendix B of Subpart D of 43 CFR Part 12) Certification Regarding Drug -Free Workplace Requirements - Alternate L (Grantees Other Than Individuals) and Alternate 11. (Grantees Who are Individuals) - (See Appendix C of Subpart D of 43 CFR Part 12) Signature on this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 43 CFR Parts 12 and 18. The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of the Interior determines to award the covered transaction, grant, cooperative agreement or loan. PART A: Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions CHECK IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR A PRIMARY COVERED TRANSACTION AND IS APPLICABLE. (1) The prospective primary recipient certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions'by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three -year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of Saud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antimist statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three -year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. PART B: Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Transactions CHECK X IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR A LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTION AND IS APPLICABLE. (1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. (2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Page 7 PART C: Certification Regarding Diu -Free Workplace Requirements CHECK X IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS NOT AN INDIVIDUAL Alternate L (Grantees Other 1ban Individuals) A. The grantee certifies that it will provide or continue to provide a drug -free workplace by. (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an ongoing drug -free awareness program to inform employees about — (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a): (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will — (1) Abide by the terns of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted — (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; (p) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Check _ if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here. PART D: Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements CHECK _ IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL Alternate IL (Grantees Who Are Individuals) (a) The grantee certifies that, as a condition of the grant, he or she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant; (b) If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, he or she will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to the grant officer or other designee, unless the Federal agency designates a central point for the receipt of such notices. When notice is made to such a central point, it shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant Page 8 Part E: Certification Regarding Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements - CHECK — IF CERTIFICATION IS FOR THE AWARD OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING AND THE AMOUNT EXCEEDS $100,000: A FEDERAL GRANT OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT; SUBCONTRACT, OR SUBGRANT UNDER THE GRANT OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. CHECK _ IF CERTIFICATION IS FOR THE AWARD OF A FEDERAL EXCEEDING EEDING THE AMOUNT OF $150,000, OR A SUBGRANT OR SUBCONTRACT EXCEEDING $100,000 UNDER THE LOAN. The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. As the authorized certifying official, I hereby certify that the above - specified certifications are true. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TYPED NAME AND TITLE DATE SIGNED (This consolidated form may be used in place of the DI -1953, DI -1954, DI -1955, DI -1956, and DI -1963 fors.) Page 9 Attachment A: City of Edina PROJECT DESCRIPTION City (CLG): Federal Grant No: Grant Time Period: City of Edina 27 -09- 21829.008 October 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010 Federal Grant No: 27 -09- 21829.008 Work Summary: The purpose of this project is to complete a multiple property study (MPS) of historic bungalows in the Morningside neighborhood. Based on the National Register Multiple Documentation Form (MPDF), the Morningside Bungalow MPS will provide a cover document for nominating individual properties for designation as Edina Heritage Landmarks, the city's overlay zoning district for protection of historically significant properties. The study will conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning (pages 44716 to 44720) in the Federal Register of 9 -29 -83 and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office's Guidelines for Architecture/History Projects of July 2005 The project will be accomplished under the supervision of personnel meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. Consultations and Progress Reports: 1. The CITY will inform the SOCIETY'S Grants Office of the name and qualifications of the historian, architectural historian, or historical architect with whom it has contracted within fifteen (15) days of the contract's execution. The CITY will at the same time provide a copy of the contract and a complete report on the procurement process demonstrating compliance with Federal competitive procurement requirements. (See H. ASSURANCES, item B, CLG Agreement, and Part VI of 2009 CLG Grants Manual.) 2. The CITY will submit a brief Monthly Progress Report (See 2009 CLG Grants Manual - Attachment F.) to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office by the 15th of each month for the duration of the project period. Product submittals will accompany the monthly reports as specified below. 3. By December 2009, the CITY will submit a table of contents to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office. 4. By February 2010, the City will submit the abstract for contexts to the SOCIETY'S Grant Office. 5. By March 2010, the City will submit a sample context to the SOCIETY'S Grant Office. 6. By April 2010, the City will submit the abstract for property types to the SOCIETY'S Grant Office. Attachment A: City of Edina Federal Grant No: 27 -09- 21829.008 7. By May 2010, the CITY will submit the bibliography to the SOCIETY'S Grant Office By June 2010, the CITY will submit draft of study to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office for SHPO staff review. The SOCIETY may request other written progress reports and on -site reviews of project progress, as necessary. Final Products: The Final Products to be submitted with the Request for Reimbursement (see Part III of the CLG Agreement) and the Project Director's Report will be three bound, one unbound, and one electronic PDF copy of the report. Proiect Director's Report: The report will include a brief description of the administration of the project. Two copies of this report will be submitted to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office with the Final Products and the Request for Reimbursement Form (see Part III of the Grant Agreement). Proiect Budget: BUDGET ITEMS GRANT RECIPIENT MATCH Cash In -Kind Other TOTAL Project Director 1000 1000 Preservation Planning Consultant 5000 4000 9000 TOTALS 5000 4000 1000 10000 Reimbursement Schedule: The CITY will be reimbursed, in total amount not to exceed $5,000, for the actual amounts expended under the federal (HPF) portion of the budget. The CITY must submit a Request for Reimbursement Form along with appropriate fiscal documentation, Final Products, and Project Director's Report to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office no later than August 30, 2010. All project work must be completed no later than July 31, 2010. Minnesota Historical Society Grants Office Request for Reimbursement for Federal HPF Grants Project:_ City: Address: Project Expenditure Classification: (use budget items from Attachment A of the Grant Agreement) TOTAL Federal Grant Number: MHS Contract Number: Federal Grant Amount: Total Expenditures Federal Attachment B .Applicant Match Supporting documentation for all costs claimed in this request must be attached. Each supporting document should be labeled with the appropriate Project Expenditure Classification. I certify that this request for Reimbursement represents actual project expenditures carried out within the period of the project. Date: Signature: Print name and title: Telephone: Attachment C SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON ALLOWABLE COSTS All costs for this project must be in conformance with OMB Circular A -87 and A -102 (revised) and the National Register Programs Guidelines NPS -49. The following points provide supplementary guidance and emphasis for areas where questions or problems may arise. 1. The project budget is divided nd those costs to which arreimbursed overed by the City (applicanton Funds (HPF federal dollars) match). All costs - -both HPF federal dollars and the applicant match - -must be adequately documented on a Request for Reimbursement Form. The applicant match portion must total, at a minimum, an amount equal to the federal portion. 2. All costs must be in payment of an obligation incurred during the grant time period. 3. All costs must represent expenditures which are necessary for the accomplishment of approved grant objectives. 4. Transferred federal monies cannot be applied as matching applicant share; monies used as match on other federal grants may not be used as matching share on this project. 5. Specific cost categories: A. Personnel (1) Project Specific Personnel are hired as regular employees specifically for the grant project. Eligible costs may include salary expenses as well as other project related expenses incurred for the benefit of the project specific personnel. These costs may be charged to the federal portion and/or to the applicant portion of the project budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported with copies of time sheets showing the employee's name, dates and hours worked, dollar amount, description of work performed, employee's signature, and the signature of the employee's supervisor. Either the City's time sheets with the above information or MHS time sheets (see Attachment D) are acceptable. (2) In -Kind Services (force account personnel) are regular employees of the City who spend all or part of their time on the grant project. Eligible costs include the actual salary of the employee including fringe benefits. (The employee must be working in the same skill for which he /she is normally paid, otherwise, only minimum wage can be used.) These costs may be 11 charged to the federal portion and/or to the applicant portion of the project budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported with copies of time sheets containing information described under 5.A.(1) above as well as documentation supporting the claimed wage rate(s). (3) Donated Services (volunteer personnel) contribute time to the grant project. If a volunteer is performing tasks within his/her normal trade or profession, the value of the contribution is based on the volunteer's normal rate of pay or the rates listed below. (The Society will furnish rates for other areas upon request.) Benefits are not eligible. If the volunteer is performing tasks outside of his/her profession, only a $10/hour rate can be used. These contributions may be utilized only for the applicant portion of the budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by time sheets with information described under 5.A.(1) above. Rates for Volunteer Personnel Appraiser $20.75 per hour Archaeologist $17.43 per hour Architect $25.57 per hour Attorney $28.19 per hour Bookkeeper /accountant $14.79 per hour Graphic Arts Specialist $17.30 per hour Historian $19.30 per hour Librarian $21.40 per hour Planner $19.99 per hour Photographer $13.77 per hour Researcher $18.20 per hour Secretary $16.37 per hour Word Processing Operator $14.84 per hour Writer /editor $19.30 per hour Non - Specialized HPC Member rate $10.00 per hour B. Contractual Services are services necessary for the completion of the project which are contracted by the City. The City must follow the requirements of OMB Circular A -102 (revised) regarding procurement standards in arranging for such services. Eligible costs may include the rates actually paid to the contractor. These costs may be charged to the state portion and/or to the applicant portion of the project budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by copies of invoices and copies of canceled checks. 12 C. Su ies and Materials (1) Donated supplies and materials are those taken out of City stock or donated by third parties. The cost of these supplies and/or materials may be charged on_y1 to the applicant portion of the budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by a Value of Donated Supplies and Materials Form (see Attachment E) which must include a description of the materials and/or supplies, date of donation, fair market value, basis for the valuation (i.e., invoice price, price in retail outlet, etc.), and signature of verifying official. (2) Purchased suuvlies and materials are those items bought specifically for the project. The City must follow the requirements of OMB Circular A- 102 revised) in the purchase of supplies and materials. The cost of these supplies and/or materials may be charged to the federal portion and/or to the applicant portion of the budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by copies of invoices and copies of cancelled checks. D. Indirect Costs may be charged to the project only if the City has a current rate that has been approved by the City's cognizant federal agency and is currently in effect. These costs may be charged only to the applicant portion of the budget. Those costs must be included on page four of the City's CLG grant application. E . Mileage Costs may be charged to the project for necessary costs incurred excluding costs of mileage from place of residence of project personnel to the project site. Mileage paid for by the City may be charged to the federal portion and/or to the applicant portion of the budget; donated mileage may be charged only to the applicant portion. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported with the following information: project personnel name, date of travel, purpose of travel, beginning and ending mileage, and rate claimed. Maximum rate allowable is $.445 per mile. 13 Attachment D Minnesota historical Society Value of In -Kind and/or Donated Services Time Sheets City and Project Name Name of Person Contributing Services Hourly Rate — Based on: Federal Grant Number Type of Worked Performed (research, planning, secretarial, etc.) Volunteer personnel donating his/her time to a project may be credited with an agreed rate (See Attachment C of Grant Agreement) unless he /she is professionally skilled in the work he /she is performing on the project. When this is the case, the wage rate the individual is normally paid for performing his/her service may be credited to the project. If a higher rate than the published volunteer rate is used, additional documentation and verification is required. Please consult with the Grants Office before claiming the higher rate. Signature of Person Donating Time Supervisor Verifying Accuracy Date Date City and Project Name Name and Address of Donor Minnesota Historical Society Value of Donated Supplies and Materials Federal Grant Number Attachment E Supervisor Verifying Accuracy Date Attachment F MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Monthly Progress Report Fonn — CLG Grants Grantee: Federal Project No. Report for the Month of. Contact: Daytime Telephone: 1. Describe month's progress toward accomplishing the goals of the project. Refer to "consultations ' and final products" listed in Attachment A. 2. Is the project currently on schedule? If not, please explain why. 3. Describe any significant problems encountered this month which may impede the successful completion. of the project. 4. Is the project on budget? Approximate costs incurred since the previous progress report (estimate only, including both federal and matching share). Prepared by: Signature: Date: 10. DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Edina proposes to complete a multiple property study (MPS) of historic bungalows in the Morningside neighborhood. Based on the National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF), the Morningside Bungalow MPS will provide a cover document for nominating individual properties for designation as Edina Heritage Landmarks, the city's overlay zoning district for protection of historically significant properties. The multiple property study will organize the themes, trends, and patterns of local history shared by bungalows in Morningside into a historic context, define property types, establish registration requirements, and develop a generic plan of treatment which can be used to guide design review decisions. The proposed Morningside Bungalows MPS will provide a cover document for future landmark nominations but is not intended as a registration document in and of itself. Much the same as a National Register MPDF, its principal purpose is to serve as a planning tool for evaluating the eligibility of bungalows for individual registration as Edina Heritage Landmarks and as such will provide a means of expediting individual landmark designations by facilitating the evaluation of individual bungalows. A major emphasis will be placed on delineating historical themes and architectural patterns common to Morningside bungalows, so that individual landmark nomination reports would focus simply on describing the properties being nominated and evaluating their design and associative characteristics within the historic context and property type framework already developed in the MPS. A key component of the MPS not found in National Register nomination documents is the plan of treatment, which is required by ordinance for all properties designated Edina- Heritage Landmarks. This "generic" plan of treatment will apply only to Morningside bungalows. This will help facilitate design review decision - making and is expected,to streamline the landmark nomination process as well. The Morningside neighborhood is located in northeastern Edina, between Wooddale Avenue, W. 40th Street, France Avenue, and W. 44th Street. It consists of over six hundred single family homes, of which more than half were constructed prior to 1950. This part of Edina was farmland until 1906, when the first suburban subdivision was platted on part of the original Jonathan Grimes farm. Suburban residential development was spurred by the extension of the Twin Cities Rapid Transit Company's interurban street railway system between downtown Minneapolis and Lake Minnetonka. In 1920 Morningside "seceded" from the Village of Edina, reincorporating itself as an independent village, and the two communities were not reunited until 1966. Bungalows in Morningside reflect several related small -house building traditions and exhibit floors plans and exterior ornamentation commonly associated with the Arts and Crafts movement. A Morningside bungalow is one to one- and -one- half stories tall, was built between 1905 and 1935, has a low- pitched hip or gable City of Edina CLG Grant Application Attachment - page l roof with wide eaves, an entry porch that is usually enclosed, and four to six rooms on the main floor. Most were built by area contractor - builders and many were originally built as spec houses. (The architectural heritage of Morningside is described in Deborah Morse -Kahn, Chapters in the City History of Edina [1998], pp. 87 -90; Paul D. Hesterman, From Settlement to Suburb: The History of Edina, Minnesota [1993], pp. 39 -72; and William W. Scott and Jeffrey A. Hess, History and Architecture of Edina, Minnesota [1979], pp. 69 -70. The Edina Historic Context Study (1999) includes a chapter entitled, "Morningside: Edina's Streetcar Suburb (1905- 1935)" which provides the broad contextual framework for the proposed bungalow study.) Bungalows and bungalow- cottages make up roughly one -third of the housing stock in Morningside and are scattered throughout the area. Based on a succession of reconnaissance and intensive level surveys carried out since the early 1980s, the Edina Heritage Preservation Board considered establishing a heritage landmark district in Morningside covering several blocks of the oldest homes; however, in 2005 the Board determined that the best strategy was to designate individual properties. Because bungalows comprise the most important class of potential heritage preservation resources, it was felt that the multiple property study offered the most cost - effective management tool. The Morningside Bungalow MPS reflects a recent trend in preservation planning that uses the thematic, multiple- property approach to identify, evaluate, and register large groups of historically and functionally related historic resources. A good example of this comes from the City of Des Moines, which sponsored a MPS of bungalows and foursquare style residences —see James Jacobson, Historical Residential Architecture in Des Moines, 1905 -1940: A Study of Two House Types, the Bungalow and the Square House (City of Des Moines, 1997). The proposed Morningside Bungalow MPS will be organize much like a National Register MPDF, featuring sections devoted to narrative. s ent of historic context, property type description and analysis, delineation of individua property registration requirements, geographical data, and a summary of identification and evaluation methods. The historic context narrative will elaborate on the themes outlined in the Edina Historic Context Study and relate them to the important broad patterns of local history. Unlike the MPDF, the MPS will include a plan of treatment focused solely on the preservation needs of Morningside bungalows. It is anticipated that the MPS will identify between 15 and 25 individual bungalows (and possibly more) which, based on existing inventory data, appear to be eligible for designation as Edina Heritage Landmarks. The City of Edina believes that heritage preservation is most effective when there is active public participation by interested and affected property owners in every step of the heritage landmark designation process. Therefore, public participation in the Morningside Bungalows multiple property study will include City of Edina CLG Grant Application Attachment - page 2 information dissemination, consultation, and stakeholder participation. To the extent possible, individual bungalow owners and neighborhood groups will be involved in every step of the project. Incorporation of the views and recommendations of property owners will have a high priority in the development of the bungalow plan of treatment. The proposed multiple property study reflects the goals and strategies of Minnesota's statewide historic preservation plan (Gaining Ground: A Preservation Plan for Minnesota's Historic Properties 2006 -2010 [2006]) 'by making preservation a key component of community development planning (goal /objective #2) and by laying the groundwork for expanding the roster of historic properties protected under the Edina Heritage Landmarks overlay zoning (goal/objective #5). The plan of treatment component of the MPS goes directly to the stated need for increased resource management planning (goal /objective #6). All project tasks will be carried out in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's ' standards and guidelines for preservation planning (Federal Register, September 29, 1983, pp. 44716 - 44720), specifically with regard to creating historic contexts, developing context goals, and integrating contexts within the broader preservation planning framework; as well as applicable SHPO guidelines for architecture/history projects. 11. PROJECT PRODUCTS The project will result in a single - volume multiple property study document organized by historic context, property type, registration requirements, geographical data, identification and evaluation methods, and plan of treatment. The format and data requirements will generally follow those of the National Register MPDF. The final study document will be fully referenced, illustrated with appropriate maps, photographs, and drawings, and generated in a digital format suitable for printing and posting on the City's website. Because of budgetary and time constraints, individual landmark nomination documents will not be prepared as part of this project. 12. COMMUNITY SUPPORT The City of Edina (population 45,912) is a first -ring Twin Cities suburban community that is generously endowed with significant historical and architectural resources. Since the municipal heritage preservation program was created in 1972, Edina citizens have voiced strong support for heritage preservation in many ways. The proposed Morningside Bungalows MPS meets the objectives of City of Edina CLG Grant Application Attachment - page 3 the city's comprehensive plan and reflects local government's commitment to heritage preservation as a vital public service. 13. PROJECT IMPACT First and foremost, the Morningside Bungalows Multiple Property Study will result in a local designation cover document similar to the National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form that will be used to designate a substantial number. of historically significant Morningside bungalows as Edina Heritage Landmarks. The project will also provide an excellent opportunity to disseminate information about the city's heritage preservation program, encourage participation opportunities for Morningside residents in planning for preservation, help publicize the unique architectural and cultural heritage of Morningside bungalows, and increase public awareness of the need to preserve and protect nonrenewable heritage resources as valuable assets for community development. 14. PROJECT PERSONNEL The Morningside Bungalows MPS will be carried out by Robert C. Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant, under the supervision of Joyce Repya, Associate Planner. Vogel meets the Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards in History and Architectural History and has over thirty years experience in historic preservation;. he has served as the preservation planner for the Edina Heritage Preservation Board since 2001. Other city staff and members of the Preservation Board may also contribute to the project on an as- needed basis. City of Edina CLG Grant Application Attachment - page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -58 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina has applied for and received a grant from the Minnesota Historical Society pursuant to authority granted by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966; and BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Edina City Council hereby accepts Grant No. 27 -09- 28129.008, along with the matching provisions of the grant agreement and authorizes and directs the City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. Dated: June 16, 2009 Attes Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 16, 2009 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 I 1 4 To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director KEYUK'1 /KLUUMMEN 1JA-1-1UN Agenda Item N.E. Consent 11 Deadline for a city decision: July 21, 2009 Planning Commission Recommended Action: On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Lot Division 4306 Grimes and 4201 Morningside Road. Information/Background: See attached Planning Commission report which includes the staff recommendation for approval and the Planning Commission minutes. Information Only ❑ Date: June 16, 2009 Mgr. Recommends FI To HRA ® To Council Subject: Lot Division to shift the existing lot line that divides Action ® Motion 4306 Grimes and 4201 Morningside Road for the . ® Resolution purpose of providing a 20- foot strip of land to 4201 Ordinance Morningside Road, the Morningside Church ❑ Discussion 11 Deadline for a city decision: July 21, 2009 Planning Commission Recommended Action: On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Lot Division 4306 Grimes and 4201 Morningside Road. Information/Background: See attached Planning Commission report which includes the staff recommendation for approval and the Planning Commission minutes. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-53 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION OF 4201 MORNINGSIDE ROAD AND 4306 GRIMES AVENUE WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: City Of Edina DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED 4306 Grimes Avenue Lot 2, except the westerly 75 feet, grimes homestead, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4201 Morningside Road Lot 1, Grimes Homestead, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the West 150 feet thereof. WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: 4306 Grimes Avenue See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit A 4201 Morningside Road See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit B WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this _ day of , 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-53 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk Exhibit A NEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4306. GRIMES AVENUE) Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also excepting therefrom that part of said Lot 2 Which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet.of Lot 2 and said line there terminating Exhibit B NEW CHURCH PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the West 150 feet thereof. Also the North 20.00 feet of Lot 2, except t e westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota Which lies easterly of the following described liner Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West,'along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet of Lot 2 and said line there terminating. Vic. �a� 21, 20 0 q 2009.0003.09a Lot Division Greg McCullough 4306 Grimes Avenue 4201 Morningside Road Planner Presentation ~` Planner Teague informed the Commission Mr. Greg, McCullough; is proposing to shift the existing lot line that divides 4306 Grimes and 4201 Morningside Drive for the purpose of providing a 20 -foot strip of land to 4201 Morningside Drive, the,,,, Morningside Church. Planner Teague explained that the previous property owner of 4306 Grimes ,had promised to give 20 feet of his property to the churchupon hisselling of the property. The property has been sold to Mr. McCullough.,who is now, following through with the agreement. The church would use the 20 -foot strip as green space for a picnic and garden area, and,the existing "day care.`` , Planner Teague noted that the two properties are 36,842 square feet in size. The previous home located at 4306 Grimes has beentorn down, and several large trees removed. A new home is�planned -on the site. This lot-is currently 21,842 square feet in size. The property at,4201 Morningside contains the Morningside Church and has a scattering, of mature trees. The church site is 15,000 square feet in size. Planner Teague recommended that the city - council approve the lot division as requested.' Appearing-:for th6 Applicant\, Greg McCullough \' Commissioner Carpenter disclosed that one of his partners is affiliated with Morningside Church and recused himself from the discussion and vote. Commissioner Carpenter left the chambers. \, Applicant Presentation Mr. McCullough addressed the Commission and explained he has worked closely with the church on this process including the re- grading of both properties. Mr. McCullough asked the Commission for their support. Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. w9�,r�l• o e �a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 27, 2009 2009.003.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. Greg McCullough, is proposing to shift the existing lot line that divides 4306 Grimes and 4201 Morningside Road for the purpose of providing a 20 -foot strip of land to 4201 Morningside Road, the Morningside Church. (See pages A6 —A7.) The previous property owner of 4306 Grimes had promised to give 20 feet of his property to the church upon his selling of the property. The property has been sold to Mr. McCullough, who is now following through with the agreement. The church would use the 20 -foot strip as green space for a picnic and garden area, and the existing day care. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses are all single - family homes zoned and guided low- density residential. Existing Site Features The two properties are 36,842 square feet in size. The previous home located at 4306 Grimes has been torn down, and several large trees removed. A new home is planned on the site. This lot is currently 21,842 square feet in size. (See pages A10 —A11.) The property at 4201 Morningside contains the Morningside Church and has a scattering of mature trees. The church site is 15,000 square feet in size. (See pages A4 —A5 and Al2 —A14.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density residential Zoning: R -1, Single- family residential Primary Issue Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. The lines between these two lots would simply be shifted to allow additional open space for the church. The area being dedicated to the church is only 2,960 square feet in size. No additional lots would be created. These are two of the larger lots in the area, and the resulting change to lot width and area would still meet the median lot standards. (See page A2.) The resulting lot areas would be 18,882 and 17,960 square feet in size, both well above the 9,951 square foot area median. Resulting lot widths would be 119 and 79, both well above the 50- foot wide area median. Lot depths would not be altered Staff Recommendation Recommend that the city council approve the lot division as requested. Deadline for a city decision: July 21, 2009 2 City of Edina 1111 1131 �f30 WtW F1. 1° P. r �d134 f' 111511111701 4001 1000 7913 7906 1306 n0o afie -- r- I --(—�� 6200 4201 915 74215 4213 12914201 /1111109-1302 1 3919 7915 103 6005 4003 6106 1205 4117 1107 4212- 130- 4205 6209 4209 4209 4206 4208 6309 1216 - aloe 1307 1213 4213 4211 1131 1172 1713 1110 4311 4211 4213 aBd- %315 IT15 6273 4217 /572- l211 1116 4217 4114 4218 4219 1219 4119 1215 4138 1216 ,_.,- 4219 4220 4221 rfm 0mII 44212 T'FNOJ 1250 j308 1218 1219_420E -1100 11f111f0_12[9 4249 IIId 1217 4753 40V&VG3vE AD 4415 420 4201 1 1 1J� 430'1 _f7 1307 (JO1 4701 (702 39157911 7903 p 1 1 1713 43179 (305 1003 ./703. 11 44051401 14117 2113 I1i14f071f07 43,14 �3, 79/77909 1703 4315 1115 1117 1706 4113 47094105 67074001 1307 4307 4706 �� 7910 9161788 1309 [706 IJ02 42/1 3924 3978 /11112101206 4201 4100 1311 4310 7936 79)0 ) 4375 _06 4/02 /316 131( 4308 4713 1212 1421] 2 4200 1.� 1401 _00 I 401040M x1775 _70 3 3919 11402 176 1215 1315 1013 4006 1001 4713 4109 4205 42018 4016 3925 D 440! 342 /377 42074703 42114207 '1324 401! 7917 t7gpp 4Jp IAN ,4306 /1 4409 N07_074375 4022 1007 4007 24 74 397839/0 V 4752 1112 1100 14011 4356 36, 415041 4015 IO r_00 414173 IOOI 4� p 7970 4500 4360 436 /176416/ �{ �( 102} 1406 _07.[004 3910 1430/11842` 12001811 �Iflf \1117 \06107 0705 4 1 /4094006 79057907 1008 \ 3e1f — 2- 410T �' 11 k2211/209 1701 'I 1 4173 6420 4207 4500 .1l7 /(501 un�m.r•�ws c�ran�c� 1056 4013 454fJ1536- i,, 1061 1013 24 45_ I5I0 4051411 6515 (s14 4057 21 245 4600 4601 7'-- 4601 1600 4602 4600s 4600 4603 1606 .1/ 4603 21 2`N 1602 46064610 PID:0702824430037 4201 Morningside Rd Edina, MN 55416 Log" Highlighted Featum House Number Labels Street Name Labals .I City Limits Croaks Lake Names Lakes LAParka 0 Parcels City of Edina Ir 4229 Legend 4731 4z71 4230 4231 4270 Street Name Luber. 4231 $236 4239 4276 4273 4232 4243 4237 4242 4235 !24 4235 (114 4138 4111 4274 va 4237 4232 4245 4279 4239 4240 4249 4238 4241 2 42/3 4242 4147 1247 4245 4310 4244 4245 4240 1117 4246 4247 4746 4308 4108 d ISO 4248 4749 4200 4731 4231 4230 4232 4235 Street Name Luber. 4234 $236 4239 4238 4240 4243 4237 4242 4244 !24 4170 (114 4248 sa]RN4Vtis/J[ r.0 41co 4109 1201 1017 4707 43nS /M.`4JOi (tot 43:7 4.11'1 4301 4313 =: 1r 4309 4213 4213 211 ,4115 4113 411/ 4109 !1071705 1103 1306 4304 (307 1708 JJUB "X" 4302 300 13 t2 43f0 4708 4214 4212 4210,1208 1206 1204 4202 4200 4317 4310 1315 1714 4112 400 4377 RRaHSCaV 37 4010 1008 4315 4005 4001 4776 1305 4101 4101 4177 4211'4211 4200 1207 4205 4124 4016 4016.4014 4012 4709 JJ07 4711 11107 4313 /313 127'0010 4007 � 7116 4112 4100 1122 .1120 4011 4401 d14n 1150' 1073 4403 ,dlatdr6o 4400 1775 4021 1u 1106 4406 4707 4191 4405 :1:JO 427'0 4101 1 u,YH e;Y Yr 4121 4710 1111 4405 H07 1135 :110 don 4412 PID:0702824430040 °�L ^~� 4306 Grimes Ave QZI -10 ;, Edina, MN 55424 uuiu M 4231 House Number Labels Street Name Luber. 4233 ciTy Lfmlts 4235 Creeks 4237 Lake Names 4139 fakes c Parks 4111 ', Parcels 4243 4245 4247 4249 sa]RN4Vtis/J[ r.0 41co 4109 1201 1017 4707 43nS /M.`4JOi (tot 43:7 4.11'1 4301 4313 =: 1r 4309 4213 4213 211 ,4115 4113 411/ 4109 !1071705 1103 1306 4304 (307 1708 JJUB "X" 4302 300 13 t2 43f0 4708 4214 4212 4210,1208 1206 1204 4202 4200 4317 4310 1315 1714 4112 400 4377 RRaHSCaV 37 4010 1008 4315 4005 4001 4776 1305 4101 4101 4177 4211'4211 4200 1207 4205 4124 4016 4016.4014 4012 4709 JJ07 4711 11107 4313 /313 127'0010 4007 � 7116 4112 4100 1122 .1120 4011 4401 d14n 1150' 1073 4403 ,dlatdr6o 4400 1775 4021 1u 1106 4406 4707 4191 4405 :1:JO 427'0 4101 1 u,YH e;Y Yr 4121 4710 1111 4405 H07 1135 :110 don 4412 PID:0702824430040 °�L ^~� 4306 Grimes Ave QZI -10 ;, Edina, MN 55424 uuiu M L—, 1 I 11 1 42114�110'w *� 42144z1a,ma.J -11a� 1406 4(02 1 41M 4(04 4916 I _ �{ iuf0 '378 4215!113 /2092207 4321 430743051701 1'1221/ 4205 '344 1411V '471343111 X56 4 v�` 7 1 I I \ 111140, ` 1752 -V V 4116 Hit {100 � 1 1120 43 ff <365�1Y064`1( 1 /feB ;24210 1 , r1 'j 61 4171 IPiB �� T4 4213 4201 r,,. �' 4132 _� , Rojeen Pqk �- 421742114109 4201 -.� 422/4219 141: /22S 4137 1 �am�,nhaWaCm�neolCl�%D.OLS a'.r5 ' a uf' 1 42H 4219 4246 q00 4301 4101 1702 400310013913 3911 390.7' fill 4107 4103 4703 3909 4109 4103 4304 CI 4307 I I7 4308 4311 792439201 7311 - - -- (310 3936 n3o .313 y 20,94999 4312 - -__ 4315 3919 1,4016 4012 1 I 3025 24 IO,t � � �f �• \.,� 3,20 IF .\ _1107' 3940 .� .4006 759�� \M75 !SH PID:0702824430037 4201 Morningside Rd Edina, MN 55416 43 4047 ❑ 1 OPOD -14PW Off— DUlne -11 ❑ POO- 21PWnea OK Dime -21 ■ PRO- 11PWnr2 ReAnm OWra -11 ®MD-21Pr RDaamn0 -1.21 ® PAD- 11P- :R-- DifLa -71 ® PRD-/IPWnaa Aenavnl Daprxt -el ® PRO.51PWnea RnAent OiMM -51 . PaR-4(P —i 13.XUR➢sb —s) ❑ R- 11Singb D..Wg MnaDmretl ® R- 2IDWwe D+'D11n9 Onit Da1rx11 . RMD(ACgbna]Ntl.�Diunel ❑ Parcels z01i I m(p City of Edina 4202 Legend 1208 4211 4212 1111 1208 1209 1206 4208 IIOQ ;205 1209 House Number Labelc 4212 4212 12fe 4213 4212 ;2� 4207 1211 4211 Street Name Labels 4213 4216 4213 _ (t }2 4217 4210 4211 4214 4213 ./ City Limits 1216 42 19 4220 IY73 ufS 1212 -4217-- J� 4120 4227 4221 22211 4220 4217 4216 4217 1211 4218 1219 „! Croaks A 1219 4221 4216 ❑ Lake Name. 4211 4217 4226 I2Y1 4226 /22, 4116 4221 4210 4219 4220 4221 Lakes ❑ 1228 {IJ} I232 It27 1728 4223 42I9� II23 1223- II72 1213 Parks 4223 1270 1215 1221 4223 1122 4223 1224 1413 Zoning 4231 1/77iE 5T 4227 4272 ° 4227 1221 4227 ;224 < 4227 II26 4117 71 e0.e4 B 1271 4119 1229 4229 4233 1239 . APB IaD+omasia Prang Dxif>L-11 <:�, 2431 4220 4226 423D 1191 4230 4271 � MOD alMime OwabDment Dinrie^a1 21 1234 /273 4236 —4233 ,232 ItJf 4232 -4237 /234 4237 ■ MDa 51Mma Dc ma+�tasv y -51 4233 (yam 1234 4273 4234 4233 MDD 6(M— 0--of 21 4236 -42V- 4238 4273 ® 1237 4238 4137 4271 4237 ❑ pyt 24 4278 — 4239 4240 1239 4239 4278 4239 4278 I238 ® PDD,1 IPMnnca Ca�rmmm Din..e -11 /240 —'4 4741 t412 4240 1241 ItIO 4241 11 4221` — 4244 4442 124 t2<3 {2!22 41M 4113 42/3 IN2 4244 Ip(3 " 4;12 4114 1106 I2IB I L_.__ —' 4113 4244 /247- 471021248 _ _.J �4aoe --'-' 1243 4247 420S ...... 1247 . - -. Ht0_ 4218 1217_20,0 _ -1118 2213 4247 42R ® x022 {P�annaac .mn�an O,eneal P6n PWZea maDe.ui D-1 L—, 1 I 11 1 42114�110'w *� 42144z1a,ma.J -11a� 1406 4(02 1 41M 4(04 4916 I _ �{ iuf0 '378 4215!113 /2092207 4321 430743051701 1'1221/ 4205 '344 1411V '471343111 X56 4 v�` 7 1 I I \ 111140, ` 1752 -V V 4116 Hit {100 � 1 1120 43 ff <365�1Y064`1( 1 /feB ;24210 1 , r1 'j 61 4171 IPiB �� T4 4213 4201 r,,. �' 4132 _� , Rojeen Pqk �- 421742114109 4201 -.� 422/4219 141: /22S 4137 1 �am�,nhaWaCm�neolCl�%D.OLS a'.r5 ' a uf' 1 42H 4219 4246 q00 4301 4101 1702 400310013913 3911 390.7' fill 4107 4103 4703 3909 4109 4103 4304 CI 4307 I I7 4308 4311 792439201 7311 - - -- (310 3936 n3o .313 y 20,94999 4312 - -__ 4315 3919 1,4016 4012 1 I 3025 24 IO,t � � �f �• \.,� 3,20 IF .\ _1107' 3940 .� .4006 759�� \M75 !SH PID:0702824430037 4201 Morningside Rd Edina, MN 55416 43 4047 ❑ 1 OPOD -14PW Off— DUlne -11 ❑ POO- 21PWnea OK Dime -21 ■ PRO- 11PWnr2 ReAnm OWra -11 ®MD-21Pr RDaamn0 -1.21 ® PAD- 11P- :R-- DifLa -71 ® PRD-/IPWnaa Aenavnl Daprxt -el ® PRO.51PWnea RnAent OiMM -51 . PaR-4(P —i 13.XUR➢sb —s) ❑ R- 11Singb D..Wg MnaDmretl ® R- 2IDWwe D+'D11n9 Onit Da1rx11 . RMD(ACgbna]Ntl.�Diunel ❑ Parcels z01i I m(p Aq -4-- 6--N MORNINGSIDE ROAD "X" IN SIDEWALK 906.9 I I SCALE 1" = 30' LOT AREA: 22,233 SQ.FT. HOUSE AREA: 1,594 SQ.FT. ADDRESS: 4306 GRIMES AVE. °I 75.D 0 0 0 o, CONCRETE DRIVE . �S 907 6 99 •33 " 90 .0 O S E LL1 I w Legal Description: LOT 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 75 FEAT n FD IP 0.41 FT. NO. 3 FD IP 75.0 909.1 FD PK 74 9 910.9 DIP 0.28 FT. S0. 148.25 N a 908.4 R�M� EXISTING HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA. m CHURCH 7 F_ T I o:. 909.2 oo 9.00:: rno w 911 2 p 06.0 2. 0 EXISTING o N89'52'54 "E r I O 906.3 74.9 223.26 1' - 904.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION TIP F C "X" IN SIDEWALK 906.9 I I SCALE 1" = 30' LOT AREA: 22,233 SQ.FT. HOUSE AREA: 1,594 SQ.FT. ADDRESS: 4306 GRIMES AVE. °I 75.D E o, CONCRETE DRIVE . �S 907 6 99 •33 " 90 .0 O S E LL1 I w Legal Description: LOT 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 75 FEAT 3 o GAR SEE U �► (' �'' Q GRIMES' HOMESTEAD N a 908.4 R�M� C4 HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA. 7 o:. 909.2 oo 9.00:: rno w p 06.0 2. 0 EXISTING o En I O z z T ai6.10 2 909.0 HOUSE N ����� C5 904.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION L ���� o FF= 911.83 `- 2060 . 0 009.00908.6 70.56 908.9 rn ` 0 N 908.5 S89'4 5'46 "W N SET 1 I 25.15 ET IP �,-Ijp 49.9 FD IP FENCE FD IP 0.35 F 7AR. FD IP 0.56 FT. 50. 900.2 901.5 I I I I i I MFm= aBY`W THAT nlls pIAH wns pXFPAXFD XY YE all UIIIIEA YY gXEY O LAmm OIOI LAw 91PEnVL9p1 AND THAT I AY A OVLY ROBE PIANIF! S ab LAIp ! XIVCYa16 NUT]m� wa� ea al„ HEM ENGINEERING jf, . P � COMPRNY, INC. -.l FD IP 30.00 'AXED FM GREG McCULLOUGH ASBUILT SURVEY 1 5512 McGWRE RD. EDINA, MN. 55439 r= > 2 f)(15TIAJ6 hots MORNINGSIDE ROAD 0 0 I r7 FD IP 0.41 FT. NO. 906.2 FO IP 75.0 909 1 FD PK 74 y 910.9 P 0.28 FT. 50. 148.25 "X" IN SIDEWALK I SCALE 1" = 30' ADDRESS: 4306 GRIMES AVE. PARCEL A AREA: 2,968 SQ.FT. PARCEL B AREA: 19,265 SQ.FT. ^ C, EXISTING m HOUSE AREA: 1,594 SQ.FT. co CHURCH I 904.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION I 911.2 906.9 N 89'52' 54 "E S89'52'54" W 906.3 74.90 NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 1484 5 904. 3 ET IP FENCE w ET 1 NE COR. LOT 2O Legal Description: N o CONCRETE DRIVE 0 M .. ...... ..... .... " O O PARCEL A ::::::::............. C) PARCEL A 1+) Z 7$.D O N ... U.1 I The North 20.00 feet d the fdbwirg desd4bed fxoperty: N 89'52' 54 "E Lot z ..pt the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIAES HCIVESTEAD, Flennep n county. FAnneawa. r\� n 803.33 Z n 907.6 0 23.50 N908.0 v�� .1 �,5 w j vd+cn fes endng t tenodhana desaihesaid {T Comrerdn9 at Na nathe�t wmer of said Lot 2; Ihence on an assurred hearin9 0l Sou M ��7(� Q a5 degrees 52 r jr". 54 seconds Nest, wJ the nalthery Noe thereof, a distance of GAR. o] •'" �� .. �n 148.3; feet to Ne poira of neghmeg ofsaid ins to be deso ibm; Nema sawn9degrees ao 1 80 ninwm 20 -all East a 3wanca 0120.00 feel to the south INe of said North 28.00 feet of c'l t� PARCEL B 9D8.4 4 �� „ Cir Lot 2ama aid eneNerelemana7m. 909.2 00 9.ao °o I 06.0 2.30 p T 2 o6.,D HousE N ............. ..... ::... Z 9os o 0 PARCEL B -911 83 F 9.00 F- Lot 2, esceq the wesledy 75.00 feel, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Wmesota. `` 20.60 0 00908.6 70.56 908.9 m Escoptdut pert welch has eastefyarthe following dP_atribed I no ConneMXq at the northeast comer of sap Lot Y thence on an -ned tearing of Sown 09 degrees 52 r inwes 54 seconds Vert. WON the noMerty line then'of, a distance of 908.5 I 89 a feel to the poiiA of beginNng of sap me to he desaitxa; thence Sowh 0 degrees 30 S89'45'46 "W SET rta8.35 20 seconds Earl a distance d 20.00 fa 110 Ne sown line of said NO dh 20.00 feet of 25.15 IP ^FENCE "Whi IN IF 903.5 Lot 2 and said line there lerranatinp. FD IP FD IP 0.56 FT. SO. FD IP 49.9 FENCE FO IP 0.35 FT. EAST 900.2 l sots 30.00 I I I fl ONS PnFP.. FOR ° WIgFy TIAT 1 ^ ANO TAT I Au A ouy GREG MCCULLOUGH CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 2 606E niui �sMlraO lop suak a uaxn Rc E RD. LOT SPLIT ENGINEEeING ,,�EDINA, \--� MN. 55459 EDIN , MN. e 5 , COMrfiNV, INC. aa.w P. Danlo eomA WRIA11 Yn1aE5aTA SSA pRo�os��D 1.+�YS x,71 GRIND I1J6 PLAN ROBE CONSULTING ENGINEERS,, ENGINEERING PLANNERS and LAND. SURVEYORS � w COMPANY, INC. l 1000 EAST 146th STREET, BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 (952) 432 -3000 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4306 GRIMES AVENUE) Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. t4. NEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4306. GRIMES AVENUE) . Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also excepting therefrom that part of said Lot 2 Which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148:35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South .0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a'distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet.of Lot 2 and said line there terminating EXISTING CHURCH PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the West,! 50 feet.thereof. NEW CHURCH PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Mi.nn.esota, except the West 150 feet thereof. Also the North 20.00 feet of Lot 2, except tie westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota Which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; .thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the :northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described ; - thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet of Lot 2 and said line there terminating. hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was. prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and at I am a du LicenJs 4 Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota. Russell P. Damlo Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor License No. 19086 fa i ::+ S J i tiw -_ �, r:r' =��`. •: _ ,.. �'�= -- -- _ --:?c� - - -bear' �_ - -.:�, __ F�"�. _ yV, �� � J" #• � � � - -T,, �_} ,,. ri <. -.� ,aim .,,, j-:�; , ��� � .. ,I o • al' I �y .�' s t !. I ��� I � �, ppppee��''.. \� ♦ ``fff' SF t r t • Y . ^ • i � "'gym.' -` . -,.-- r ;,' ��. -� �, -,_ ----Z ti 11 i4 ABM 0 -*- �jj R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 1 6/4/2009 -6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 322843 61412009 100612 A.M. LEONARD 65.96 GARDENING SUPPLIES 00002011 212721 010959590 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 65.96 322844 614/2009 100613 AAA 9.50 TABS FOR 26.182 212556 052909 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.50 322845 614/2009 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 218.00 COBRA ADMIN 212434 009505 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 675.10 FLEX SPENDING ACCOUNT ADMIN 212435 009326 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 893.10 322846 6/4/2009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 122.05 212501 0802070 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 102.20 212502 0802194 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 59.40 212503 0802193 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 283.65 322847 61412009 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 878.97 MAINTENANCE 212436 6209 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,878.15 EQUIPMENT 212436 6209 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 274.24 T -14 MAINTENANCE 212437 6449 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 378.08 UNIT 147 MAINTENANCE 212438 6602 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 457.95 UNIT 133 MAINTENANCE 212439 6645 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 415.35 UNIT 138 MAINTENANCE 212440 6643 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 333.55 UNIT 138 MAINTENANCE 212441 6589 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 7,616.29 322848 61412009 101949 ADDED TOUCH 1,300.00 PAINT POOL PADS 212722 051609 5311.6532 PAINT POOL OPERATION 1,300.00 322849 614/2009 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 30.98 ALARM MONITORING 212557 92903936 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 30.98 322850 614/2009 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 224.00 COFFEE 212442 127156 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 224.00 322851 61412009 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/4/2009 - 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 836.03 SAND SEPARATOR 00005627 212558 8011.69 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 2 Business Unit WELL PUMPS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES RESERVE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 836.03 322852 6/4/2009 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 1,056.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212640 052709 5110.6103 77.68 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212641 052609 5101.4413 1,133.68 322853 61412009 100625 AMERICAN RED CROSS 42.00 TRAINING 212444 R9- 001423 1419.6104 42.00 322854 6/4/2009 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 286.86 PAPER 00005971 212405 10203425 -00 1552.6406 33,061,85 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004162 212723 10201555 -00 2210.6123 33,348.71 322855 6/4/2009 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 360.00 GIFT SHOP HELP 212642 052709 5120.6103 360.00 - 322856 6/412009 101548 ANDERSON, TOM 96.75 FLOWERS, HERBS 212559 052809 5424.6406 96.75 322857 61412009 116465 ANDERSON, TOM 154.00 CONFERENCE MILEAGE 212406 052709 5840.6107 154.00 322858 61412009 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 69.00 PREMIUM 212443 6100000111583 1550.6200 69.00 322859 6/4/2009 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 14.00 ONIONS 212560 1160283 5421.5510 1,029.15 FOOD 212561 1159798 5421.5510 1,043.15 322860 614/2009 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 9.59 SPRINKLER, FITTINGS 00005963 212407 30899 5913.6406 9.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 2 Business Unit WELL PUMPS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES RESERVE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 3 614/2009 -6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 322861 614/2009 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 227.71 COFFEE 212445 412661 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 227.71 322862 61412009 102660 AUDUBON INTERNATIONAL 200.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 212724 GC1689 -2009 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 200.00 322863 614/2009 120995 AVR INC. 1,040.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212408 19332 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 472.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212409 19197 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,003.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212410 19140 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 715.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212411 19415 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 826.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212411 19415 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 4,056.00 322864 61412009 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 121.35 BATTERIES 00005957 212412 18- 239872 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 121.35 322865 6/4/2009 124341 BECCHETTI, MARIAN 280.00 PARKING PERMITS REFUND 212725 052909 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 280.00 322866 6/4/2009 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 502.41 ICE GRAPHICS 00008077 212562 00073752 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 502.41 322867 6/412009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 181.65 212504 49072500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 171.55 212505 49068300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 113.10 212506 49072600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 63.13 212507 82262100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 109.37 212508 82261900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 484.52 212509 5806400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 129.83 212510 82262000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,253.15 322868 61412009 124344 BELLEVEAU, ALBERT 500.00 SCULPTURE 212713 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 R55CKREG L0620000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 4 6/412009 - 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 322869 6/4/2009 100401 BELTRAMI COUNTY 150.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 212563 052609 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 150.00 322870 6/412009 100661 SENN, BRADLEY 101.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212643 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 189.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212644 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 290.40 322871 614/2009 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 93.70 COSTUME, PROPS 212413 052709 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 93.70 322872 6/4/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 241.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009044 212564 OE- 195060 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 191.68 INK CARTRIDGES 00009088 212565 OE- 192971 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 433.48 322873 61412009 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 11.12 UNIFORM PURCHASE 212363 052609 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11.12 322874 61412009 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 212400 060409 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 322875 61412009 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 320.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212645 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 320.00 322876 6/4/2009 102545 BLUE CROSSIBLUE SHIELD 1,135.80 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 212726 REHAN ABU 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,135.80 322877 61412009 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 230.84 FORM HOLDERS 00003537 212727 50762 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 230.84 322878 614/2009 122942 BORNOWSKI, CLAY 191,20 MAINTENANCE 212646 052909 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 191.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 5 6/4/2009 - 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 322879 61412009 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 2,574.00 DOOR OPERATOR 212446 510794S 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 2,574.00 322880 6/412009 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 567.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212647 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 567.00 322881 614/2009 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6/9/09 212710 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 322882 6/4/2009 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 816.30 NEWSLETTER 00008227 212447 17763 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 816.30 ; 322883 61412009 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 175.00 PERFORMANCE 6/9/09 212709 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 322884 614/2009 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 212399 060409 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 322865 6/412009 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 56.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 212648 052709 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 228.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212648 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 284.00 322886 61412009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,516.55 212511 14983 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 70.00 212512 14985 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 37.05 212681 14986 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,554.05 212682 14988 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,177.65 322887 6/412009 117800 CARLSON, JOHN 165.00 PERFORMANCE 6/11109 212712 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION. 165.00 322888 6/4/2009 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 100.00 PROGRAM REGISTERS 212448 052009 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/412009 — 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 322889 61412009 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 210.00 212513 82218 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page- 6 CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING PUBLIC ART ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PUBLIC ART 45.91 TRAINING EXPENSES 212449 052709 1400.6104 CONFERENCES B SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 45.91 322895 6/4/2009 116304 CLAY, DON 737.63 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 212649 052709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 737.63 322896 6/412009 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 604.50 212514 0138018016 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 604.50 322897 6/412009 122068 COLWELL, R.L. 65.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212650 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 65.00 322898 60" 124331 COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE CHEMICA MEDIA STUDIO YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES 210.00 322890 6/4/2009 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 2,280.53 5591458 -4 212414 051909 1551.6186 HEAT 23.20 5590919 -6 212730 5/19/09 7413.6582 FUEL OIL 11.45 8033998 -9 212731 MAY1909 1552.6186 HEAT 11.45 8034001 -1 212732 5 -19 -09 1552.6186 HEAT 2,326.63 322891 6/4/2009 124345 CHESTER, PERCI 500.00 SCULPTURE 212714 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 322892 6/412009 124258 CHICAGO DISTRIBUTION CENTER 189.34 WILDFLOWERS 212566 5727235 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 189.34 322893 61412009 124347 CHRISTIANSEN, TOM 1,000.00 SCULPTURE 212716 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000.00 322894 61412009 114548 CIZEK, DARIN 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page- 6 CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING PUBLIC ART ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PUBLIC ART 45.91 TRAINING EXPENSES 212449 052709 1400.6104 CONFERENCES B SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 45.91 322895 6/4/2009 116304 CLAY, DON 737.63 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 212649 052709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 737.63 322896 6/412009 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 604.50 212514 0138018016 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 604.50 322897 6/412009 122068 COLWELL, R.L. 65.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212650 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 65.00 322898 60" 124331 COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE CHEMICA MEDIA STUDIO YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/312009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 7 6/412009 — 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 131.16 DEGREASER 00005728 212567 22326 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 131.16 322899 614/2009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 51.65 RESPIRATORS 00005851 212450 03466877 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 51.65 322900 6/4/2009 101974 CONNIE'S CATERING 2,832.37 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION 212364 050409 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 2,832.37 322901 6/4/2009 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL 554.70 WORKERS COMP 212451 1390298 1470.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,067.30 WORKERS COMP 212451 1390298 1400.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,622.00 322902 61412009 116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC. 287.17 CAULK GUN, SEALANT 00005954 212415 433014 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 287.17 322903 6/4/2009 124332 COOK COUNTY 400.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 212568 052909 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 400.00 322904 6/4/2009 101590 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE 15,635.00 2009 SERVICES 212452 2009 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 15,635.00 322905 6/4/2009 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 212728 7070142984 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 322906 6/412009 124346 COWLES, CHARLES F 500.00 SCULPTURE 212715 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 322907 6/4/2009 105192 CUB FOODS SOUTHDALE 100.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 212733 060109 1470.4325 FIRE FEES - ALL OTHER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 322908 614/2009 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 64.80 INSTRUCTOR AC 212651 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 613/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/4/2009 - 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 64.80 322909 61412009 100700 CURTIS 1000 693.49 BOOKLET ENVELOPES 212453 2322593 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 523.77 #10 ENVELOPES 212454 2320141 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,217.26 322910 61412009 124338 CURTIS, JAN 110.00 PATRON CARD REFUND 212734 052709 5401.4531 MEMBERSHIPS GOLF REVENUES 110.00 322911 6/412009 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 130.82 FUEL PUMP 00006467 212569 146154 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 63.62 IGNITION SWITCH 00006472 212570 146285 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 26.22 CARB KIT 00006468 212571 146396 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 67.66 CONDENSER, CAP, POINTS 00002021 212729 146568 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 288.32 322912 6/4/2009 121384 CVS WHOLESALE FLAGS 596.00 FLAGS FOR PARADE 212365 100666463 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 596.00 322913 6/412009 104020 DALCO 650.72 TISSUE, BOWL CLEANER 00008079 212455 2099053 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 10152 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 212572 2098202 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY 545.28 WYPALLS 00005966 212573 2099194 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,299.52 322914 6/412009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,394.80 212515 505617 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 288.00 212683 506151 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,682.80 322916 61412009 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL 5,470.00 LEAD REMOVAL CONTRACT 212735 09 -14-01 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 4,905.10 LEAD REMOVAL CONTRACT 212736 09 -14 -02 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 10,375.10 322916 6/412009 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 252.76 318" QUIET MINI IMPACT 00005764 212366 386592 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.42 DYE 00005771 212456 388145 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.65 UNIVERSAL JOINT 00005771 212457 388134 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERA" IEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/4/2009 — 614/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 82.25 RATCHET 00005771 212458 388007 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 383.08 322917 61412009 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 93.46 BAKERY 212574 301752 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 100.90 BAKERY 212575 301753 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 66.29 BAKERY 212576 301889 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 260.65 322918 6/4/2009 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 412.50 FIREARM SAFETY CLASSES 212737 052909 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 412.50 322919 61412009 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 47.00 AQUATIC WEED PERMIT 212738 060109 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 47.00 322920 6/4/2009 122234 DEVRIES, NICHOLAS 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212652 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.00 322921 61412009 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 977.89 FA -2 CHIPS 00005444 212577 67608 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 977.89 322922 6/4/2009 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA 90.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212653 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART.CENTER ADMINISTRATION 90.00 322923 6/4/2009 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 166.14 APRIL CAR WASHES 212459 3813 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.14 322924 6/412009 106194 EMA INC. 7,625.00 WELL 93 SCADA START UP 212367 805604.053 -1 05470.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -470 WELL HOUSE #3 7,625.00 322925 614/2009 102309 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC. 2,277.00 SIREN MAINTENANCE 212460 32162 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 2,277.00 322926 6/412009 106049 ENDRIZZI, MARY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/4/2009 — 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,440.00 SENIOR CENTER HELP 212578 052909 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,440.00 322927 61412009 122601 EUROSPORT 96.25 LIFEGUARD WARM -UP 212368 52264449 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 96.25 322928 6/4/2009 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 150.07 PUMP KIT 00005773 212369 6- 1139561 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87.12 JOINT KIT 00005422 212579 6- 1139163 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 237.19 322929 61412009 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 50.58 CABLE FASTENERS 212370 MNTC297667 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 50.58 322930 6/4/2009 104474 FILTERFRESH 228.85 COFFEE 00001073 212580 79470478 -2010 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 228.85 322931 614/2009 119211 FIRSTLAB 156.00 DRUG TESTING 212461 00110786 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 156.00 322932 6/4/2009 112916 FOSS SWIM SCHOOL 1,353.72 RETAIL ITEMS 212739 0000011 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,353.72 322933 61412009 105168 FRANKLIN, ELIZABETH 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212654 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240.00 322934 61412009 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 2,650.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212655 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,650.00 322935 61412009 118896 FRYKMAN, LAURA 680.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212656 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 680.00 322936 6/4/2009 100764 G & K SERVICES 61.92 SHOP TOWELS 212581 1006593095 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE P INDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 11 6/4/2009 - 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 61.92 322937 61412009 124352 GEARGRID CORPORATION 1,785.32 GEAR LOCKERS 00003516 212740 INVO900581 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5,515.94 GEAR LOCKERS 00003516 212741 INVO900582 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 7, 301.26 322938 61412009 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 139.11 FILTERS 00005936 212371 1128547 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 139.11 322939 61412009 100774 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE 996.69 PUMP 00005761 212372 33624 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 996.69 322940 61412009 111343 GLANZER, ROGER 74.00 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT 212462 052809 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.00 322941 6/412009 100761 GRAFIX SHOPPE 1,003.90 LETTERING 00005411 212582 64525 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,003.90 322942 6/4/2009 101103 GRAINGER 162.56 HAMMERS, SCREWDRIVERS 00005947 212373 9902033589 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 214.09 WATERTIMERS, PAINT 00005947 212373 9902033589 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 448.84 MARKING PAINT 00005974 212416 9904705903 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 129.59 FAN MOTOR 00005958 212417 9903418698 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 46.95 FOUNTAIN LIGHTS 00006482 212583 9900815177 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 34.96 METAL SCREWS 212742 9905978798 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 1,036.99 322943 61412009 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 447.25 212516 110372 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 82.25 212684 110371 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 529.50 322944 61412009 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 154.00 CONFERENCE MILEAGE 212418 052609 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 154.00 322945 6/4/2009 118195 GREEN HORIZONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/412009 — 614/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 54.81 ROTOR 00001051 212463 142736 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 54.81 322946 6/412009 124336 GREER, ROBIN 318.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212657 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 318.50 322947 61412009 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 7,911.00 GROUP LESSONS 212584 052809 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 7,911.00 322948 61412009 124340 GRIMES, DORIS 10.00 CLASS REFUND 212743 052709 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 10.00 322949 6/412009 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 981.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212658 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 981.00 322950 6/4/2009 100840 GUSTAFSON, KATHY 1,000.00 SCULPTURE 212720 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 1,000.00 322951 6/4/2009 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 55.51 RELAYS 00005725 212585 53202 -1 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 55.51 322952 6/4/2009 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 13,048.05 GAS 00001437 212419 S010010313 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13,048.05 322953 6/4/2009 101255 HASLER INC. 144.32 POSTAGE RATE CHANGE, RENTAL 212374 11370682 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 144.32 322954 61412009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,725.00 CHEMICALS 00005451 212420 3021669 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,717.25 CHEMICALS 00005451 212586 3022628 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 6,442.25 322955 614/2009 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 22.50 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 212659 052709 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 13 614/2009 — 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 315.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 212659 052709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL 'SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 337.50 322956 6/4/2009 100802 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 296.00 EMT REFRESHER CLASS 212464 20909 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 296.00 322957 614/2009 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,241.94 ROOM & BOARD APR 2009 212465 2009 4 -EDINA 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 1,241.94 322958 6/412009 118773 HIGHLIFT EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 51.59 SHUTOFF VALVES 00005772 212421 S02139 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.59 322959 61412009 105962 HOFF, BRUCE 594.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212660 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 594.00 322960 6/412009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 922.45 212517 487303 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 922.45 322961 6/4/2009 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 333.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 212587 052909 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 333.85 322962 6/4/2009 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,317.51 CONCESSION PRODUCT 212466 125851 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,317.51 322963 6/4/2009 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 1,143.71 PRINTER RIBBONS 00006283 212586 58385 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,143.71 322964 614/2009 120941 INFINITY GEAR 228.89 UNIFORMS 00003531 212744 12349A 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 228.89 322965 6/4/2009 122966 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 556.80 TOUGH BOOK DOCKING STATION 00003522 212745 1100090109 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 556.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register. 6/4/2009 - 61412009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation _ PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 322966 6/4/2009 102640 IPMA -HR 1,676.99 TESTING 212467 24153026 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1419.6102 1322.6180 1553.6530 5862.5512 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 5822.5514 5422.6406 7410.6218 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 14 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,676.99 GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 322967 61412009 50TH ST SELLING 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 212404 060409 100.00 322968 614/2009 124330 JEFF MARTIN COMPANY 520.00 HAUL & ERECT LIGHT POLES 00005690 212589 5842 520.00 322969 6/412009 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 31.62 LENS 00005424 212590 0013216 31.62 322970 6/4/2009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 67.50 212518 1269096 437.00 212591 1281448 195.00 212592 946858 5,540.65 212685 1273367 56.85 212686 1273377 6,297.00 322971 614/2009 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 96.80 FOAM MARKER, WAND 00006290 212593 51279514 96.80 322972 6/412009 103215 JOHN E. REID & ASSOCIATES INC. 8,990.00 INTERVIEW COURSE 212746 105439 8,990.00 322973 61412009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 934.01 212519 1635208 2.24 212520 1635207 1,243.44 212521 1635209 314.82 212522 1637743 140.09 212523 1637738 .37 212687 1637727 1,165.32 212688 1637729 .56 212689 1637722 1419.6102 1322.6180 1553.6530 5862.5512 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 5822.5514 5422.6406 7410.6218 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 14 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDUCATION PROGRAMS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PSTF ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/4/2009 -- 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 629.46 212690 1637718 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,206.90 212691 1637716 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,026.72 212692 1637717 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 371.83 212693 1637719 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 548.66 212694 1637720 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH $T SELLING 37.12- 212695 419885 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,547.30 322974 61412009 100357 JOHNSON, DAN 28.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 212468 052809 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.97 322975 6/4/2009 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 574.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212661 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 574.00 322976 6/4/2009 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD W. 144.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 212662 052709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 144.00 322977 6/4/2009 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 477.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 212663 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 477.50 322978 6/4/2009 100563 KEEHR, GREGORY 157.30 CONFERENCE MILEAGE 212469 052809 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 157.30 322979 614/2009 117792 KIDDE FIRE TRAINERS INC. 1,423.28 MEMORY MODULE 212747 5709 7413.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF FIRE TOWER 1,423.28 322980 6/412009 113963 KIEFER, KAREN 117.50 ART WORK 212664 052709 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 117.50 322981 61412009 124348 KILBANE, CHRIS 500.00 SCULPTURE 212717 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 322982 614/2009 118397 KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC 425.00 ASPHALT PATCH 00005729 212594 27123 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 61312009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/4/2009 - 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 425.00 322983 614/2009 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 912.60 INSTRUCTOR AC 212665 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 912.60 322984 6/412009 123142 KODIAK MOBILE MFG. INC. 657.02 SQUAD DOCKING STATION 212470 5286569 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 657.02 322985 61412009 102235 KOMADINA, KEVIN 500.00 SCULPTURE 212718 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 322986 614/2009 101502 KONTERS, VIK 30.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 212471 052709 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.00 322987 61412009 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 128.28 VEHICLE TOW 212472 052809 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 128.28 322988 6/412009 100848 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC 1.050.00 MEDIATION SERVICES 212473 050409 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,050.00 322989 61412009 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 60.90 LOGO SHIRTS 212422 07562350 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 96.74 LOGO SHIRTS 212422 07562350 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 133.00 LOGO SHIRTS 212422 07562350 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 290.64 322990 61412009 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 14.93 UNIFORM PURCHASE 212474 052709 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 160.15 UNIFORM PURCHASE 212474 052709 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.15 TRAINING EXPENSES 212475 052609 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT 212476 052909 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 223.23 322991 61412009 100856 LINHOFF PHOTO 4.64 DIGITAL REPRINTS 212477 112823 1400.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL_ 4.64 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 17 6/4/2009 — 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 322992 6/4/2009 124333 LUSE, MICHAEL S 80.00 PIANO TUNING 212595 925212 5631.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 80.00 322993 6/4/2009 122472 M & I BANK 391.80 4807 1200 1364 1991 212748 051409 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 639.83 4807 1200 1364 1991 212748 051409 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,031.63 322994 61412009 100868 MARK VII SALES 260.00 212596 470560 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 6,215.57 212696 468855 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,475.57 322995 6/4/2009 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 225.00 HOSTING FEE 212749 133 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 225.00 322996 6/412009 100079 MASON, THOMAS 49.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 212478 052609 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.95 322997 6/412009 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 338.50 ALERT SYSTEM REPAIRS 212750 430468 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 2,345.00 CAMERA INSTALLATION 212751 430484 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 1,560.00 CAMERA INSTALLATION 212752 430485 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 4,243.50 - 322998 61412009 124349 MCEACHRON, MARCIA 500.00 SCULPTURE 212719 060109 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 322999 6/412009. 101928 MCKENME, THOMAS 28.64 TRAINING EXPENSES 212479 052709 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.64' 323000 61412009 124142 MCNAUGHTON, MARY 210.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212666 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 210.00 323001 6/4/2009 101483 MENARDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 18 6/4/2009 - 614/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 34.60 KNEEPADS, LUMBER 00005969 212423 39952 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 24.60 PAINT SUPPLIES 00008086 212480 39547 5511.6532 PAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 59.20 323002 61412009 101987 MENARDS 91.53 EYEBOLTS, BRACKETS, PLANTERS 00002017 212753 82931 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 91.53 323003 6/412009 124091 MESSETLER, GREG 68.86 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 212500 052209 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 68.86 323004 61412009 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 212597 052709 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 323005 614/2009 102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN 57.85 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212667 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.85 323006 6/4/2009 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 2,558.21 ASPHALT 00005445 212375 98745MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,558.21 323007 61412009 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 220.48 GASOLINE 00006204 212598 44676 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 197.61 GASOLINE 00006204 212599 44677 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 241.65 DIESEL 00006205 212600 44678 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 200.40 GASOLINE 00006204 212601 44755 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 323.36 GASOLINE 00006204 212602 44756 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 383.67 DIESEL 00006205 212603 44757 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 227.96 GASOLINE 00006204 212604 44851 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 364.26 GASOLINE 00006204 212605 44852 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 366.16 DIESEL 00006205 212606 44853 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 2,525.55 323008 6/4/2009 122772 MINGER CONSTRUCTION 1,873.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 212555 060509 04347.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -347 PROMENADE IMP PHASE 1 12,120.92 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.8 212555 060509 05469.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -469 NORTH PROMENADE 101,498.34 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 212555 060509 07102.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S102 PROMENADE IMP PHASE 1 115,492.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/412009 -- 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323009 614/2009 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,077.00 CONNECTION FEE 212376 052709 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22, 077.00 323010 61412009 102137 MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATI 390.00 MEMBERSHIP - DAN MCMAHON 00001049 212424 12456DUES 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 390.00 323011 61412009 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 366.00 DRIVING CLASS 212481 629430 -1242 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 366.00 323012 61412009 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 23.00 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 00005730 212757 051109 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 23.00 323013 61412009 118066 MINNESOTA REVENUE . 240.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 212607 2200068673 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 240.00 323014 61412009 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,373.85 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005449 212425 59135 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,009.62 CRS 2 EMULSION 00005449 212608 59140 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,383.47 323015 61412009 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 15.98 POLICE DEPT BRASS PLATE 212482 051409 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.98 323016 61412009 103246 MOIR, BILL 110.66 STAFF LUNCH 212756 060109 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 110.66 323017 61412009 122241 MONAHAN, KIMBERLY 540.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212668 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 540.00 323018 61412009 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 423.48 PUMP, MOTOR & FAN 00001002 212377 468385F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.23 RELAY 00001004 212378 468397F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 565.71 R55CKREG LOG20000 332.44 CITY OF EDINA 6/412009 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 Council Check Register 100.00 323027 6/4/2009 6/4/2009 — 61412009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #. Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323019 6/4/2009 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 136.44 TABLE EASELS 00009046 212611 37394300 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.44 451.33 BEDKNIFE 00006486 212609 670403 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 451.33 323020 61412009 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 78.03 SPANNER WRENCHES 00003529 212754 00103400 1470.6556 TOOLS 34.19 HANDLES, PINS 00003529 212755 00103041 1470.6556 TOOLS 112.22 323021 6/4/2009 124342 MYLAN, JUNE 1,262.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 212758 052909 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,262.00 323022 6/412009 114345 NAIOP 85.00 2009 INDUSTRIAL REPORT 212759, 0606109 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 85.00 323023 61412009 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 6/312009 7:48:10 Page - 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE 6 GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING 209.50 212524 54880 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 209.50 323024 6/4/2009 101958 NICOL, JANET 427.90 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 212669 052709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 427.90 323025 6/412009 104350 NIKE USA INC. - 332.44 MERCHANDISE 212610 921227325 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES RESERVE PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 332.44 323026 6/412009 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 212403 060409 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 323027 6/4/2009 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 1,227.09 LIGHTS, STROBE TUBES 00001007 212483 21033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,227.09 323028 61412009 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 136.44 TABLE EASELS 00009046 212611 37394300 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.44 323029 6/4' 124339 NTA -UPPER MIDWEST RESERVE PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/4/2009 -- 614/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 NTA -UPPER MIDWEST 212760 052809 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 240.00 MEMBERSHIPS -EMMY APPLICATIONS 212760 052809 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 290.00 323030 614/2009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 6.97 LETTER TRAYS 00006034 212612 474970340 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 151.81 NOTE CARDS, INK CARTRIDGES 00006034 212613 474689565 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 158.78 323031 61412009 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 63.70' ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212670 052709 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 63.70 323032 614/2009 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 39.41 HYDRAULIC RAM RENTAL 00008084 212484 550968 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 168.51 RATCHET STRAPS, PIPE WRENCH 00005774 212614 551688 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 207.92 323033 61412009 124343 OPERATION DENOVO 1,200.00 RESTITUTION 212761 124343 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 1,200.00 323034 61412009 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 107.94 PEST CONTROL 212379 46073398 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 107.94 323035 6/412009 102440 PASS, GRACE 486.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212671 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 792.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 212671 052709 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES_ ART CENTER POTTERY 79.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212672 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1,357.30 323036 61412009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,873.30 212525 8223342 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,263.90 212526 0000197 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,137.20 323037 6/4/2009 123330 PEARSON, KARI 310.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212673 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 310.00 323038 61412009 100674 PENHALL COMPANY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 613/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 22 6/412009 - 6/4/2009 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 275.00 SAW CUT CONCRETE 00001039 212615 52151 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 275.00 323039 6/4/2009 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,091.30 212616 CUST 5601718 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,091.30 323040 61412009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 301.63 212527 2757829 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 450.30 212528 2759813 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 357.25 212697 2759804 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 268.47 212698 2759805 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 387.78 212699 2759803 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,765.43 323041 6/412009 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 250.86 PLUGS 00006478 212617 S1294733.001 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 664.57 FAIRWAY MOWER REPAIR 00006285 212618 S1294568.001 5431.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 915.43 323042 614/2009 124031 PLUS ONE SERVICES 416.00 PORT AUTHORITY TEES 00009029 212619 2598 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 416.00 323043 6/4/2009 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 74.77 TIRE 00005681 212380 703940 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 139.99 TIRE, SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005681 212381 709900 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 833.60 TIRES 00001005 212485 709887 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,048.36 323044 61412009 121550 POND & LIGHTING DESIGNS INC. 101.56 FOUNTAIN PARTS 212762 00004709 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 101.56 323045 6/4/2009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 585.00 BRM PERMIT #6171002 212763 051309 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 585.00 323046 61412009 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. 166.85 SEAT CUSHION REPAIR 00001044 212382 16216 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.85 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 614/2009 - 614/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323047 614/2009 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 523.75 TISSUE, ROLL TOWELS 00002029 212764 4467 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 523.75 323048 61412009 100971 QUALITY WINE 6/312009 7:48:10 Page - 23 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES 176.00 212529 160096 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 852.81 212530 160349 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 324.80 212531 160247 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,058.80 212532 161197 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING - 1,911.07 212533 161196 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 952.01 212534 161575 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 858.50 212535 161387 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 465.20 212536 161389 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,599.19 323049 61412009 123898 QWEST 52.43 952 922 -2444 212426 2444 -5 /09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 112.98 952 920 -8166 212427 8166 -5/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8.44 952 451 -6058 212486 6058 -5/09 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.94 952 922 -9246 212487 9246 -5109 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 213.79 323050 614/2009 124329 RADISSON HOTEL LA CROSSE 946.62 CONFERENCE LODGING 212488 300965 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 946.62 323051 6/412009 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 1,137.50 REWIRE CONTROLLERS 00002028 212765 94394 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,137.50 323052 61412009 101698 RECREONICS 324.83 POOL VACUUM PARTS 212489 498596 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 324.83 323053 614/2009 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 110.00 CLEARED MAIN LINE 212383 52451 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 110.00 323054 61412009 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 6110/09 212711 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/4/2009 - 6/412009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323055 6/4/2009 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 36.15 WIRING 00001001 212490 1042952 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 147.34 HITCH PIN LOCKS, BALL 00005973 212620 1043569 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183.49 323056 6/412009 111732 RINGQUIST, JOHN 215.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212674 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 215.00 323057 6/4/2009 124334 RIVER BEND INDUSTRIES 6,451.78 WATER TANK 00005402 212621 IN052138 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 6,451.78 323058 61412009 124337 ROMEO, ANGELA 127.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212675 052509 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 127.40 323069 61412009 122272 RUGHONIEMI, JANE 50.00 PERFORMANCE 6/8/09 212708 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 50.00 323060 61412009 101682 S & S WORLDWIDE INC. 955.19 ART SUPPLIES 212766 6234599 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 955.19 323061 6/412009 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 423.64 PARTS WASHER SERVICE 212622 0038954774 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 423.64 323062 6/412009 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 786.00 FURNISH /INSTALL SAFETY DEVICE 212623 7100163735 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 786.00 323063 61412009 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 113.58 NAME PLATES 212767 40464 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 113.58 323064 61412009 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 128.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212676 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 590.35 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 212677 052709 5110.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 719.05 R55CKREG LOG20000 50.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/4/2009 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 6/412009 -- 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323065 6/4/2009 75892 120292• SIGNATURE CONCEPTS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 145.00 STAFF UNIFORMS 212491 297357 5320.6201 LAUNDRY 5421.6102 178.00 STAFF UNIFORMS 212491 297357 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 225.00 STAFF SHIRTS 212492 297536 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 323068 548.00 104786 SOUTHDALE PET HOSPITAL 323066 61412009 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY B 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION 50.00 PERFORMANCE 617/09 212707 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GRILL GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 948.00 212700 JM8308 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 948.00 50.00 323067 6/4/2009 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 157.50 ICE MACHINE REPAIRS 212624 75892 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,570.72 FREEZER REPAIR 212625 75922 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,728.22 323068 61412009 104786 SOUTHDALE PET HOSPITAL 55.50 VET SERVICES FOR NAN 00007115 212493 195005 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 55.50 323069 6/4/2009 110977 SOW, ADAMA 187.85 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212678 052709 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 241.14 INSTRUCTOR AC 212678 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 588.00 CLEANING 212678 052709 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,016.99 323070 6/4/2009 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 78.65 AD FOR BID 212384 1181582 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 35.75 PUBLISH NOTICE 212385 1181581 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 114.40 323071 6/412009 102926 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 222.59 ASTRON 212626 1410 -RGR 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 222.59 323072 61412009 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 1,194.40 TRIPLET 00006476 212627 5045 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 1,194.40 323073 61412009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. GRILL GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 948.00 212700 JM8308 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 948.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 212629 71866 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 528.00 Council Check Register 323081 6/412009 114364 TILSNER CARTON CO. 6/4/2009 — 6/412009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323074 6/4/2009 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 323082 6/4/2009 120519 TIMM, ALEX 395.12 MOVIE LICENSE 00002025 212768 RG0778547 5631.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 212770 052009 395.12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 30.00 323075 61412009 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 323083 6/4/2009 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 212402 060409 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 100.00 YEARLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 212430 24163 5820.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 323076 61412009 YEARLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 120418 SWANSON, TIMOTHY 24163 5840.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,220.00 YEARLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 30.00 LIQUOR DECOY 212769 052009 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.00 323077 61412009 106673 TAPCO 260.86 POSTS WITH HARDWARE 00005678 212428 318331 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 260.86 323078 61412009 101027 TARGET 162.10 X- XXX -XX9 -840 FOOD 00006285 212628 051809 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 162.10 323079 614/2009 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 38.08 BULB 00005752 212494 72552 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 38.08 323080 6/412009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 26 Business Unit CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION RESERVE PROGRAM LIQUOR INSPECTION STREET NAME SIGNS GRILL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 528.00 212629 71866 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 528.00 323081 6/412009 114364 TILSNER CARTON CO. 1,136.51 CARDBOARD BACKING 212772 455295 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 1,136.51 323082 6/4/2009 120519 TIMM, ALEX 30.00 LIQUOR DECOY 212770 052009 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 30.00 323083 6/4/2009 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 148.04 PLASTIC SHELF LABELS 212429 24172 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,780.00 YEARLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 212430 24163 5820.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 50TH STREET GENERAL 2,220.00 YEARLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 212430 24163 5840.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,220.00 YEARLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 212430 24163 5860.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT VERNON LIQUOR GENFRAL 6,368.04 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 614/2009 -- 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323084 61412009 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 64.03 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212679 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 64.03 323085 6/412009 101042 TRIARCO 242.56 PLAYGROUND CRAFT SUPPLIES 00007105 212495 58351 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 99.81 PLAYGROUND CRAFT SUPPLIES 00007110 212496 62426 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 342.37 323086 6/412009 120644 TUINENGA, TREVOR 45.00 LIQUOR DECOY 212771 052009 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45.00 323087 61412009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 186.93 BLADES, KIT 00005790 212386 SI18579 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 174.27 BLADE, SHOE 00006483 212630 5118590 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 81.99 BLADE 212631 T120131 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 443.19 323088 6/412009 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 416.95 SEED MIXTURE 00005960 212431 20946 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 985.13 SEED MIXTURE 00006293 212632 20974 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 1,402.08 323089 61412009 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 745.95 GENIE LIFT RENTAL 212387 81067028 -001 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 268.48 WHEEL KIT, GAS CAN 00005693 212633 81163904 -001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,014.43 323090 61412009 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 12.10 PAGER 212388 S6096083E 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 12.10 323091 61412009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 396.12 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 212432 121687 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 396.12 323092 6/412009 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 201.38 212497 2010611652 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 201.38 613/2009 7:48:10 Page - 27 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES PLAYGROUND & THEATER PLAYGROUND & THEATER LIQUOR INSPECTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 613/2009 7:48:10 Council Check Register Page - 28 6/4/2009 -614/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323093 6/4/2009 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC 232.92 SPINDLE, AXLE 00006480 212634 41923 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 25.49 TIMING BELT, FILTERS 00002006 212773 41922 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,805.18 2004 E -Z -GO VEHICLE 00002012 212774 52109001 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,063.59 323094 6/4/2009 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 46.01 LIGHTING 00005948 212389 15129814 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.06 LIGHTING 00005948 212389 15129814 -00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.77 LIGHTING 00005948 212389 15129814 -00 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 275.92 LIGHTING 00005948 212389 15129814 -00 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 607.74 LIGHTING 00005948 212389 15129814 -00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,085.50 323095 6/4/2009 105466 W.S. DARLEY & CO. 95.46 FREIGHT CHARGES 00003891 212775 0000826747 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 95.46 323096 6/4/2009 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 167.84 POSTCARDS 00009030 212635 25498 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 167.84 323097 6/4/2009 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 212401 060409 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 323098 6/4/2009 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 245.32 UNIFORM PURCHASE 212498 052609 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 89.09 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 212499 052209 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 334.41 323099 6/412009 124236 WEINHOLD, CRYSTAL 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 212680 052709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 323100 6/4/2009 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 576.65 JUNE 2009 MAINTENANCE 212433 060109 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 576.65 323101 61412009 124199 WEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES 240.00 AUTO TRACK SERVICES 212776 AB0001972919 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENEP" 240.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 61412009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA 220.50 Council Check Register 227484 2,314.75 6/4/2009 - 6/4/2009 233616 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323102 614/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 212540 233613 323.30 397.95 212549 218775 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 149.65 1,856.18 212550 218779 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 472.95 344.80 212543 233607 321103 614/2009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 212544 233606 526.24 1,030.76 212551 274996 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE AA2 44 1,129.80 212701 275537 5842 5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 212702 275536 323104 61412009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 220.50 212537 227484 2,314.75 212538 233616 2,524.65 212539 233615 452.92 212540 233613 397.95 212541 233614 1,856.18 212542 233608 344.80 212543 233607 1,631.72 212544 233606 1,030.76 212545 230843 1,129.80 212546 232554 463.90 212547 232552 4,423.83 212548 233603 16,791.76 323105 6/412009 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 338.14 GOLF PENCILS 212636 221386 338.14 323106 61412009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 357.80 212552 229479 489.75 212553 229324 847.55 323107 6/412009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 57.00 51- 4420190 -3 212390 196944798 7,710.38 51- 6955679 -8 212705 197504161 10,921.36 51- 6644819 -9 212706 197318340 18,688.74 5822.5513 5840.6406 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5410.6406 5822.5513 5862.5513 1321.6185 1551.6185 5620.6185 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 29 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY HALL GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 614/2009 — 6/4/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323108 61412009 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 464.50 212554 5061 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 464.50 323109 6/412009 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 2,044,80 GUTTER BROOMS 00005428 212637 0122896 -IN 1310.6523 BROOMS 2,044.80 323110 6/4/2009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 8.34 HOSE 00001006 212638 PCO01144189 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 30.12 HOSE, COUPLING 00001064 212639 PCO01144190 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 38.46 476,448.69 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 476,448.69 Total Payments 476,448.69 6/3/2009 7:48:10 Page - 30 Business Unit VERNON SELLING STREET CLEANING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF —..,jA 6/3/2009 7:49:07 Council Check Summary Page - 1 61412009 - 6/4/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 99,935.39 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 33,670.55 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,798.85 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 118,370.10 05100 ART CENTER FUND 19,063.61 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,815.70 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 25,326.88 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 1,217.14 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 15,853.55 05800 LIQUOR FUND 69,146.83 05900 UTILITY FUND 59,362.17 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,873.24 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 23,014.68 Report Totals 476,448.69 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po�lli9l and procedures da __.1 Manager R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 1 6/11/2009 - 6/1112009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323113 6/1112009 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 929.53 TRACK EQUIPMENT PARTS 213175 21- 020810 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 929.53 - 323114 611112009 108757 3D SPECIALTIES 1,700.01 SIGNS 00005959 212859 429889 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,700.01 323116 6/1112009 101833 A.T.O.M. 525.00 TRAINING 213067 17789210 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 525.00 323116 611112009 1'02971 ACE ICE COMPANY 76.00 212915 0802267 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 52.40 212916 0802264 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 70.00 212917 0802252 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 78.80 213100 0802250 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 138.00 213101 0802263 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20.00 213102 0722184 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ VERNON SELLING 112.00 213103 0802192 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 32.00 213343 0722227 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 579.20 323117 6/1112009 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 8.41 U -BOLTS AND NUTS 00005426 212860 S018803 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.41 323118 6/11/2009 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 776.60 REMOTE METERS 00005191 212781 801053 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 776.60 323119 6/1112009 102716 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 398.62 EVENT BROCHURE PAPER 213176 76329 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 398.62 323120 6/11/2009 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 379.80 HAND DRYER REPAIR 00002246 213177 6161 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 379.80 323121 611112009 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 40.61 213326 053109 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 42.03 213326 053109 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/1112009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 43.01 213326 053109 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 92.50 213326 053109 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 111.30 213326 053109 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 129.82 213326 053109 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 239.41 213326 053109 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 439.59 213326 053109 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,138.27 323122 611112009. 100665 AMSAN 70.31 CARPET CLEANER 00005976 212782 201890167 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 70.31 323123 6111/2009 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 262.46 COPIER PAPER 00006396 213178 10204292 -00 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 262.46 323124 6111/2009 102171 ANDERSON -JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 1,200.00 PLANNING SERVICES 213269 080720509 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,200.00 323125 611112009 104693 ANDERSON SPRINKLER CO. 80.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 213270 5217 DUNCRAIG 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA 80.00 323126 611112009 124377 ANDERSON, TIM 130.00 CLASS REFUND 213327 060209 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 130.00 323127 6/11/2009 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 1,748.97 FOOD 213179 1163414 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,748.97 323128 611112009 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 115.76 REPAIR MAINLINE 00001040 212783 31143.CITY 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 115.76 323129 611112009 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 560.19 CONCRETE PATCH, SOLENOID 213027 34090 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 560.19 323130 6N' 'q9 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 260.20 COFFEE 213068 412841 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICE =RAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 323131 6/11/2009 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # 86.91 COFFEE 122.91 COFFEE 470.02 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 - 6111/2009 Doc No Inv No Account No 213180 412832 5430.5510 213271 412888 7411.6406 119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 110.00 EBROCHURE 00006324 213181 16288 5410.6122 110.00 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page- 3 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PSTF OCCUPANCY GOLF ADMINISTRATION 323132 6/1112009 114476 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 95.85 MONITORING SERVICE 00005975 212784 134532 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 143.78 MONITORING SERVICE 00005818 212785 134531 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 239.63 323133 611112009 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 45.28 213028 060109 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 77.09 213028 060109 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 82.52 213028 060109 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 86.05 213028 060109 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 86.22 213028 060109 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 86.71 213028 060109 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 96.30 213028 060109 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 98.37 213028 060109 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 116.41 213028 060109 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 196.92 213028 060109 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 239.37 213028 060109 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 256.45 213028 060109 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 269.23 213028 060109 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 269.24 213028 060109 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 287.66 213028 060109 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 311.01 213028 060109 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 359.19 213028 060109 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 421.81 213028 060109 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 586.17 213028 060109 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,972.00 323134 611112009 120995 AVR INC. 590.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212786 19807 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 590.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212787 19733 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,298.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212788 19658 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 455.00 CONCRETE 00005448 212789 19561 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 942.50 CONCRETE 00005448 212790 19506 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,062.00 CONCRETE 00005448 213182 20029 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 213273 1,239.00 CONCRETE 213273 6,176.50 10042.1705.20 323135 6/1112009 23271029.00 -2 124379 BAKER, STACY 213274 60.00 CLASS REFUND 213274 60.00 10042.1705.20 323136 6/11/2009 23271029.00 -3 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 49088300 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/16/09 YORK SELLING 150.00 82288700 323137 6111/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 213106 2,923.00 STORMWATER MGMT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,107.10 LIFT STATION STUDY 49219400 1,107.10 LIFT STATION STUDY YORK SELLING 1,107.11 LIFT STATION STUDY 5822.5512 102.50 LIFT STATION STUDY 213346 102.50 LIFT STATION STUDY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 102.50 LIFT STATION STUDY 82315200 6,551.81 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 323138 611112009 121083 BARR, FRANK 516.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 516.75 323139 611112009 '102195 BATTERIES PLUS 48.98 BATTERY 48.98 323140 611112009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 377.15 60.55 195.10 881.19 1,095.50 170.68 245.68 2,436.59 102.80 175.65 53.98 5,794.87 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 - 6/1112009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00005448 213183 19947 1314.6520 CONCRETE 213328 060509 1600.4390.15 213002 060109 5631.6136 213272 23270354.00 -170 5932.6103 213273 23271029.00 -2 10041.1705.20 213273 23271029.00 -2 10042.1705.20 213273 23271029.00 -2 10043.1705.20 213274 23271029.00 -3 10041.1705.20 213274 23271029.00 -3 10042.1705.20 213274 23271029.00 -3 10043.1705.20 213005 060209 5101.4413 00005590 213275 18- 237987 1646.6188 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page- 4 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN ART WORK SOLD TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB LS42 LIFT STATION 7 REHAB LS43 LIFT STATION 8 REHAB LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB LS42 LIFT STATION 7 REHAB LS43 LIFT STATION 8 REHAB ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 212918 49148800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 212919 49148700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 212920 49149100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 212921 49149000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 213104 49088300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 213105 82288700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 213106 82288900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 213344 49219400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 213345 49216000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 213346 49216100 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 213347 82315200 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 5 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323141 6111/2009 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 63.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213006 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 63.70 323142 6111/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 25.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 212861 WO- 563482 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 19.47 WRITING PADS 213029 OE- 196255 -1 5820.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 141.00 BINDING COVERS, ENVELOPES 213276 OE- 196275 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 186.38 323143 6/1112009 124380 BESTERWITCH, M 40.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 213329 060209 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 40.00 323144 611112009 101691 BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 440.91 PLASTIC TOOLS 00006383 213184 24349 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 440.91 323145 6/11/2009 122699 BIOLAWN 3,998.99 WEED CONTROL TREATMENT 00005133 212791 CUST48670 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 3,998.99 323146 6111/2009 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 69.94 TOILET SERVICE 00005984 212792 15820 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 37.26 TOILET SERVICE 00005983 212793 15819 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 107.20 323147 6111/2009 101376 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 23.96 KEYS 00005768 212794 S64679 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.96 323148 611112009 124370 BOWLES, SALLY 56.00 TRIP REFUND 213069 060209 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 56.00 323149 6/11/2009 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 1,573.50 AIR COMPRESSOR, SEALS 00001003 213030 298912 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.22 TUBE ASSEMBLY, SEALS 00001003 213031 299066 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.02 HOSE ASSEMBLY, SEAL -O -RING 00001003 213032 299266 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,686.74 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/1112009 -- 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323150 611112009 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 28.84 PETTY CASH 213330 060509 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 35.24 PETTY CASH 213330 060509 5430.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.00 PETTY CASH 213330 060509 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 59.30 PETTY CASH 213330 060509 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 70.00 PETTY CASH 213330 060509 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.76 PETTY CASH 213330 060509 5410.6235 POSTAGE 340.14 323151 611112009 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 274.50 SOIL OBSERVATIONS & TESTING 213277 307577 05436.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 274.50 323152 611112009 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 367.95 CANDY 212862 2340:017969 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 367.95 323153 6/1112009 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 22.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213007 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 22.75 323154 611112009 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 166.77 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 213278 17813 5822.6575 PRINTING 166.77 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 213278 17813 5842.6575 PRINTING 166.78 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 213278 17813 5862.6575 PRINTING 500.32 323155 611112009 124356 CADY, MELISSA 13.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213008 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 13.00 323156 6/1112009 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 6 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF REVENUES GRILL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES 364.70 MERCHANDISE 213185 918598589 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 364.70 323157 611112009 121563 CANEPA, AIMEE 113.62 TRAINING EXPENSES 213070 060409 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 113.62 323158 611112009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 6,914.85 212922 15107 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 557.35 212923 15098 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 7 6111/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 109.90 213186 15144 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 7,582.10 323159 611112009 124375 CASCADE ELECTRIC LLC 890.00 OUTDOOR LIGHTING REPAIR 00002245 213187 052109 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 890.00 323160 611112009 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 70.00 PROGRAM CHANGES 212863 060109 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 120.00 REGISTER PAPER 212863 060109 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 190.00 323161 6/11/2009 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 276.00 212924 82267 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 106.00 213107 82284 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 382.00 323162 611112009 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 844.79 5546504 -1 212795 052609 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 844.79 323163 6/1112009 105851 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 100.00 DEPOSIT FOR OKLAHOMA 213071 331740 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 100.00 323164 6/1112009 124258 CHICAGO DISTRIBUTION CENTER 402.66 WILDFLOWERS 00009013 213188 5734091 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 402.66 323165 611112009 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 251.61 ENVELOPES 212796 23459 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 251.61 323166 611112009 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 656.12 212925 392491 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 656.12 323167 6111/2009 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 673.06 00113607- 0342163045 212864 0342163045/09 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 673.06 323168 6/1112009 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/1012009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/11/2009 - 6111/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 439.50 213108 0198153520 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 642.50 213109 0198488308 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,082.00 323169 6/1112009 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 213189 052309 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 213190 052409 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 61.90 8772 10 614 0177449 213191 052509 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 61.90 877210 614 0164959 213192 MAY2509 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 257.75 323170 6111/2009 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 3,216.66 ASPHALT 00005445 213193 053109 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,216.66 323171 6111/2009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 45.00 REFLECTIVE SAFETY TAPE 00001043 212797 03468610 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 146.87 EARPLUGS, GLOVES 00001043 212797 03468610 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.87 EARPLUGS, GLOVES 00001043 212797 03468610 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 146.87 EARPLUGS, GLOVES- 00001043 212797 03468610 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 146.87 EARPLUGS, GLOVES 00001043 212797 03468610 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 105.40 EARPLUGS 00001058 213033 03469820 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 20.00 GAS CAN, EARMUFFS 00001074 213194 03471200 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 56.38 GAS CAN, EARMUFFS 00001074 213194 03471200 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 150.00 GAS CAN, EARMUFFS 00001074 213194 03471200 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 964.26 323172 6/1112009 101704 COOK, BARBARA 379.23 PROGRAM COORDINATOR 213279 9 -1493 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 379.23 . 323173 611112009 103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC. 553.40 INK CARTRIDGES 213280 95568496 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 553.40 323174 611112009 116179 CURB MASTERS INC. 2,480.00 REPLACE WALK, DRIVE APRON 00005733 213034 4031 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,480.00 323175 6/1112009 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 406.50 SCADA REPAIRS 00005735 213035 9680 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STAT'- MAINT 406.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL Council Check Register 6/1112009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323176 6/11/2009 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 1,437.75 METER HEADS 00005731 212865 6067298 5917.6530 1,437.75 323177 6/11/2009 104020 DALCO 553.16 GLOVES, TOWELS 00008087 212866 2100830 5511.6511 1,248.23 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008053 213195 2086040 5511.6511 445.17 GLASS CLEANER, LINERS 00002019 213196 2099139 5630.6406 2,246.56 323178 611112009 102285 DAVANNIS 104.78 TRAINING LUNCH 213072 191738C 1400.6104 104.78 323179 6111/2009 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 185.16 DAIRY 212867 052809 5421.5510 185.16 323180 611112009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 7,986.89 212926 506573 5842.5514 89.60 212927 506586 5842.5515 2,473.50 212928 506572 5822.5514 563.60 212929 505616 5822.5514 128.00 212930 506218 5822.5513 3,578.15 212931 505634 5862.5514 263.25 213348 506893 5842.5514 43.90 213349 506571 5862.5515 3,279.15 213350 506570 5862.5514 18,406.04 323181 611112009 124357 DELANEY, ALICE 267.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213009 060109 5101.4413 267.80 323182 611112009 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 106.57 BAKERY 213197 302263 5421.5510 88.19 BAKERY 213198 302264 5421.5510 32.60 BAKERY 213199 302548 5421.5510 50.75 BAKERY 213200 302783 5421.5510 278.11 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 9 Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6111/2009 — 6/1112009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323183 6/1112009 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 2,536.30 MAY 2009 SURCHARGE 212868 6521053060 1495.4380 2,536.30 323184 611112009 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 1,131.03 BIRTHDAY PARTY INVITES 213201 34907 5621.6575 1,131.03 323185 611112009 102831 DEX EAST 365.00 213073 110311867 -5/09 5610.6122 152.90 213074 650487671 -5/09 5511.6188 517.90 323186 611112009 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 27.92 HOSE, NIPPLE 00005474 213202 802111570 1335.6406 620.22 PAINT 00005474 213203 802111548 1335.6532 648.14 323187 611112009 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,417.96 REFUSE 212912 983441 4095.6103 3,285.00 REFUSE 212913 983300 4095.6103 6,702.96 323188 611112009 124358 DILL, SARAH 32.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213010 060209 5101.4413 32.50 323189 6/11/2009 124289 DISTRIBUTOR SALES INC. 330.47 SOLENOID, SWITCH 212869 8871 5311.6406 330.47 323190 6/1112009 100420 DOGGIE WALK BAGS 2,150.00 DISPENSER BAGS 00005806 212798 200905432 1647.6406 2,150.00 323191 611112009 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 716.66 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 213281 24478 5822.6122 716.66 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 213281 24478 5842.6122 716.68 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 213281 24478 5862.6122 2,150.00 323192 61, 116357 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC. 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 10 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 — 6/1112009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 885 53 MCQUAY ENGINEERING 213204 201000382 5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ART WORK SOLD 'CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN LAUNDRY FIRST AID SUPPLIES 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page- 11 Business Unit EB /CL BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER . CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CONSULTING DESIGN BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 885.53 323193 6/11/2009 124359 DYER, EMILY 85.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213011 060109 5101.4413 85.80 323194 6/1112009 124038 EDINA LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 900.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR - RICHWOOD DR 213282 543789 01343.1705.20 87.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR - LOCHLOY DR 213283 543790 01342.1705.20 987.50 323195 6111/2009 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 49.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 213036 060309 1301.6201 49.98 323196 6/11/2009 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 1,851.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003814 213284 INV1174778 1470.6510 1,851.50 323197 611112009 117483 ENGELE, LEE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/17/09 213003 060109 5631.6136 150.00 323198 6/1112009 116401 ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFORMS 98.90 SPRINKLER REPAIR - AYRSHIRE 213285 9666 01342.1705.20 98.90 323199 611112009 122879 EXECS. BIG BAND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/15/09 213000 060109 5631.6136 150.00 323200 6/11/2009 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,681.25 MAY TRANSPORTS 213037 060209 1470.6103 5,681.25 323201 611112009 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 388.94 ROTORS, PADS 00001009 212799 6- 1141171 1553.6530 80.47 BATTERY 00005775 212872 6- 1141118 1553.6530 469.41 323202 6/11/2009 122649 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY ART WORK SOLD 'CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN LAUNDRY FIRST AID SUPPLIES 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page- 11 Business Unit EB /CL BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER . CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CONSULTING DESIGN BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/11/2009 - 6111/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 569.19 FOOD 212870 6342124 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 227.00- CREDIT 212871 6279068 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 342.19 323203 611112009 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 12.30 SHIPPING 213075 9- 204 -40293 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.30 323204 611112009 104474 FILTERFRESH 133.47 COFFEE 00001091 213038 13640502 -2010 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 133.47 323205 611112009 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 213286 17467 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 323206 6/1112009 103985 FLOR, JON 200.00 AD DESIGN 213076 2155 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 323207 611112009 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 91.89 K9 EXAM 213077 346467 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 91.89 323208 6/1112009 124360 FORDE, BETH 81.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213012 060209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 81.25 323209 611112009 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 158.06 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 213205 060309 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 158.06 323210 611112009 124378 FUNKYCHUNKY & GRACIOUS GIFTS 137.40 MERCHANDISE 00006261 213331 00011478 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 137.40 323211 6111/2009 123080 GARDEN VIEW GREENHOUSE 1,254.31 PLANTS 00002034 213206 396320 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 640.50 PLANTS 00002034 213207 396318 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,894.81 323212 6/ 103186 GERTENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/1112009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 326.24 PLANTS 00002249 213208 171974 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 101.73 PLANTS 00002249 213209 173137 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 13 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 1470.6188 ' TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4078.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCLUSION PROGRAM 1552.6406 427.97 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 323213 611112009 GENERAL SUPPLIES 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1646.6406 28.50 R -91 PHONE 1553.6530 213287 1472987 5420.6406 28.50 CLUB HOUSE 323214 611112009 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 1,050.00 INTERPRETING SERVICE 213078 060309 1,050.00 323215 6/1112009 101103 GRAINGER 31.97 BATTERIES 00001065 212800 9002918432 53.83 MARKING WAND 00001065 212800 9002918432 14.58 SOLENOID VALVE COIL 00007114 212801 9002238021 176.36 SOLENOID 00007114 212802 9002238013 306.90 CABLE TIES, MEASURING TAPES 00005967 212803 9904013415 248.18 BALL VALVE, COUPLINGS 00005777 213039 9003966265 . 55.93 LIGHT BULBS 00006281 213210 9001686451 887.75 323216 6111/2009 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 733.50 213110 110566 82.25 213351 110565 815.75 323217 611112009 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. - 4.94 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001056 213040 941528492 401.13 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001056 213040 941528492 406.07 323218 611112009 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 225.57 MERCHANDISE 213211 39554 172.70 MERCHANDISE 213212 39474 398.27 323219 611112009 100166 GRITTON, KAY 57.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213013 060109 57.20 323220 611112009 122870 HARPER -LORE, BONNIE 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 13 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 1470.6188 ' TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4078.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCLUSION PROGRAM 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 5862.5513 5822.5513 5911.6406 5630.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 5101.4413 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL PUMPS GENERALSUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 — 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 44.85 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213014 060109 5101.4413 44.85 323221 6111/2009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 6,068.60 CHEMICALS 00005451 212804 3023433 5915.6586 701.84 CHEMICALS 213041 3023865 5311.6545 2,501.25 TONKAZORB 00005451 213213 3024892 5915.6586 9,271.69 323222 6/1112009 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC 342.65 SURVEYING SUPPLIES 213288 563801 1260.6577 342.65 323223 6/11/2009 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 24.15 4' TILE PROBE 00005722 212805 8995294 5913.6406 24.15 323224 611112009 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 158.30 SAND 212873 666146 5311.6406 145.22 SAND 00008083 212874 663902 5511.6406 303.52 323225 611112009 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 215.04 MEAT PATTIES 00006335 212875 021799 5421.5510 215.04 323226 611112009 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 1,357.30 BOOKING FEE- MAY 2009 213079 2513 1195.6170 1,357.30 323227 611112009 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 212806 QB9783 1470.6103 2,475.08 323228 6/1112009 101102 HIDDEN FENCE OF MINNESOTA 133.75 DOG FENCE REPAIR - LOCHLOY DR 213289 09 -0526- 1050 -24 01342.1705.20 133.75 323229 611112009 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 78.08 CLEANING TOWELS 00002248 213214 2884516 5620.6406 94.90 CLEANER, POLISHING PADS 00002248 213215 2884515 5620.6511 172.98 Subledger Account Description ART WORK SOLD 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING DESIGN BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 611012009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/11/2009 - 611112009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323230 611112009 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 52.46 SEALER, BRUSH 00001048 212807 003343221 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 52.46 323231 6/1112009 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 635.50 212932 487378 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 51.90 212933 487370 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 470.50 212934 487369 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 701.10 213111 488066 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 25.95 213352 488063 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 614.50 213353 488062 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,499.45 323232 6111/2009 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 657.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 212876 060109 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 657.80 323233 611112009 124382 HULBERT, NICOLE 2.90 PARTIAL SEASON REFUND 213332 060109 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 42.10 PARTIAL SEASON REFUND 213332 060109 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 45.00 323234 611112009 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 3,060.55 RIBBON 8 TOPCOAT 213216 58433 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 3,060.55 323235. 611112009 101468 IIMC 300.00 APPLICATION FEE 213042 060309 1180.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ELECTION 300.00 323236 6/1112009 102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC 426.00 MOUND CLAY 00005622 212877 4116 1642.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK FIELD MAINTENANCE 426.00 323237 '611112009 121231 INTERLOCK CONCRETE PRODUCTS IN 506.50 BLOCK 00005950 212878 49431 -1 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 506.50 323238 611112009 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 115.50 FENCE REPAIR - LOCHLOY DR 213290 120272 01342.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -342 HIGHLANDS AREA 115.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323239 6/1112009 121307 ISKIERKA, JOY 49.07 TRAINING EXPENSES 213080 060409 2310.6104 1646.6556 1260.6406 5310.6103 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 TOOLS 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 16 BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1401.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 49.07 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 1600.4390.47 323240 6111/2009 1400.6406 100823 J & F REDDY RENTS INC. 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1190.6106 67.27 TOOLS RENTAL 00005977 212808 03- 315785 -03 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 67.27 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 323241 6111/2009 5842.5515 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5512 182.95 MASTIC TAPE, EPDM TUBE 213291 94434 182.95 323242 611112009 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 680.00 SAFETY AUDIT 212879 20041640 680.00 323243 611112009 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 13.98 213043 060109 16.85 213043 060109 20.90 213043 060109 27.23 213043 060109 29.58 213043 060109 36.34 213043 060109 154.79 213043 060109 299.67 323244 611112009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 137.40 212880 1285423 156.60 212881 1285424 235.00 212882 1281499 147.65 212883 947101 67.50 212935 1269107 43.00 212936 1273362 4,369.10 212937 1273361 482.00 212938 947949 6,983.75 212939 1273376 2,988.05 213112 1284818 161.50 213113 1284830 15,586.67 213114 1284829 1,418.45 213354 1269135 7,389.50 213356 1284816 1646.6556 1260.6406 5310.6103 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 TOOLS 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 16 BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1401.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 1600.4390.47 SPRING BREAK HS MUSICAL PARTY PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 17 6/1112009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 40,166.17 323245 611112009 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 56.91 SPRAYERS 00005802 212884 51348116 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 56.91 323247 6/1112009 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 461.84 212940 1637726 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 303.63 212941 1637725 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,107.60 212942 1637728 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 262.24 212943 1637734 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 259.85 212944 1639017 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 91.12 212945 1639020 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,523.35 212946 1637741 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.12 212947 1637723 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,912.88 212948 1637742 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 80.12 212949 1637739 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,349.76 212950 1637733 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 985.74 212951 1637732 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 112.12 212952 1637724 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 743.73 212953 1635343 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17.75- 212954 418236 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 98.33- 212955 420929 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20.32 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 213115 415256CORRECT 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,124.47 213116 1641606 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 360.08 213117 1641605 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,624.00 213118 1641608 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,106.16 213119 1641597 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 102.62 213120 1641604 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,855.10 213121 1641607 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,865.83 213122 1641609 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 690.37 213123 1637736 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,320.21 213124 1637735 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 873.78 213125 1637740 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 69.51 213126 1641596 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,186.97 213127 1637731 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 213128 1637721 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,602.38 213129 1637730 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,712.39 213357 1641600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 115.20 213358 1641595 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,606.00 213359 1641599 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,672.11 213360 1641602 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 18 \ 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 ) Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,228.67 213361 1641601 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,822.59 213362 1641603 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 225.24 213363 1641598 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 44,264.14 323248 6111/2009 124361 JOHNSON, LUANN 68.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213015 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 68.25 323249 611112009 700919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 9.99 PETTY CASH 213044 060209 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 10.52 PETTY CASH 213044 060209 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 11.11 PETTY CASH 213044 060209 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 17.08 PETTY CASH 213044 060209 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 70.55 PETTY CASH 213044 060209 5112.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER POTTERY 91.36 PETTY CASH 213044 060209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 142.08 PETTY CASH 213044 060209 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 352.69 323250 611112009 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 113.50 OVD DISKS 213045 060309 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 113.50 323251 6/1112009 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 120.00 REIMBURSE FOR VET CHARGES 212885 060209 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 120.00 323252 611112009 124348 KILBANE, CHRIS 198.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213016 060209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 198.25 323253 611112009 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 2,792.40 DESIGN IMPROVEMENT SERVICES 213292 3864743 01237.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -237 50TH &FRANCE RENOVATION 2,792.40 323264 611112009 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 184.01 MERCHANDISE 213217 2498849 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 184.01 MERCHANDISE 213218 2498204 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 368.02 323255 6111/2009 105371 KLINE, GWEN 53.63 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213017 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 53.63 323256 611112009 104979 KOCON, ED 184.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 213219 060309 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 184.25 323257 611112009 103272 KOOLE, DIANE 99.92 LODGING FOR SEMINAR 213220 060409 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 99.92 323258 611112009 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD 154.66 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 213333 060509 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 220.16 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 213333 060509 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 374.82 323259 611112009 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 105.30 TOWING 00001106 213221 63276 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.30 323260 6111/2009 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 485.64 BATTERIES 213081 391111 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 465.64 323261 6/11/2009 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 25.00- VOUCHER 66144592 213082 07616427 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 25.00- VOUCHER 66098663 213082 07616427 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 1,554.04 LOGO CLOTHING 213082 07616427 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 1,504.04 323262 6111/2009 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 185.39 CONNECTORS, HOOK & LOOPS 00001047 213046 8113099 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 185.39 323263 6111/2009 100226 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 650.00 LIFE VESTS 213047 117130 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 630.00 VEST STORAGE CART 213222 115558 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,280.00 323264 611112009 121078 LMS IRRIGATION INC. 222.95 SPRINKLER REPAIR - BRUCE AVE 213293 20078955 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN. BRUCE, CASCO 347.93 SPRINKLER REPAIR - EDGEBROOK00005460 213294 20078745 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 570.88 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 20 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323265 611112009 101792 LUBE -TECH 1,985.10 BULK OIL 00005423 212809 1658652 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 369.45 BULK OIL 00005423 212810 1658611 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 399.12 GREASE 00001053 213048 1660341 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,753.67 323266 6/11/2009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 413.21 213130 63081 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 551.04 213131 62574 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 964.25 323267 6/1112009 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 98.94 DRIVE SPROCKETS, CHAIN 00001061 213049 2093614 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.94 323268 6/11/2009 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 471.84 JANITORIAL SERVICE 213295 C003614 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 471.84 323269 6111/2009 100868 MARK VII SALES 100.00 212956 472393 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 64.50 212957 472394 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,518.00 212958 472392 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,508.05 212959 471240 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,860.00 212960 468999 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 90.40 212961 468856 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 600.00 212962 469463 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,506.14 212963 471508 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,078.70 212964 471802 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 84.00 212965 471509 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,314.00 212966 471482 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,557.60 212967 471481 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 334.00 213223 473455 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,941.65 213364 474370 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 27,557.04 323270 611112009 114594 MARTIN, ANTHONY 92.72 TRAINING EXPENSES 213083 052909 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 92.72 323271 61 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/1112009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 62.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 213334 060509 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 62.70 323272 611112009 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 400.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 213296 6560 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 400.00 323273 6111/2009 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 274.86 212886 607279939 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 274.86 323274 6/1112009 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 145.00 WELL INSPECTION 213335 22665 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 145.00 323275 6/1112009 102197 MCFOA 40.00 MEMBERSHIP - DEB MANGEN 213336 060909 1180.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 40.00 323276 6/1112009 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,472.50 UFF DA TRIP 213084 060109 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 1,532.00 ORDWAY TRIP 213085 JUN0109 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 4,004.50 323277 6/11/2009 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 57.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 212887 052609 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 57.75 323278 611112009 101483 MENARDS 42.47 SIDING 00001050 212811 42592 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.03 LUMBER 00005796 212812 42133 1646.6577 LUMBER 94.66 CAP HAMMER, STAPLES 00001057 212813 42758 1301.6556 TOOLS 30.62 PAINT SUPPLIES 00008093 212888 43015 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.53- RETURN 00008071 212889 43011 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.15 PAINT, BROOMS 00006280 212890 41285 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 231.40 323279 6/1112009 101987 MENARDS 100.43 HOSE, CRABGRASS KILLER 00002330 213224 85475 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.76 DEGREASER, HANGERS, GLUE 00002036 213297 83964 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 151.19 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 21 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ELECTION SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS WEED MOWING STREET RENOVATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS RANGE CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 — 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323280 6111/2009 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 276.79 TENNIS NETS 00005810 212814 115992 1647.6406 223.44 LINE MARKING PAINT 00005811 212815 115934 1642.6544 500.23 323281 6/1112009 102602 METRO CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS 72.65 RECEIPT PAPER 00006288 212891 67156 5410.6513 72.65 323282 6/11/2009 100885 METRO SALES INC 1,661.29 COPIER MAINTENANCE 212892 327267 1470.6215 1,661.29 323283 611112009 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 344,406.11 SEWER SERVICE 212914 0000901404 5922.6302 344,406.11 323284 6/1112009 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 1,265:50 ASPHALT 00005445 212816 98953MB 1301.6518 1,265.50 323285 611112009 121124 MILLER, NANCY 16.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213086 060109 5101.4413 16.25 323286 611112009 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 80.60 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 213225 052609 5620.6406 95.92 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 213225 052609 5621.6406 176.52 323287 611112009 121053 MILLER, SUSAN 32.20 PETTY CASH 213226 060509 5620.6620 35.00 PETTY CASH 213226 060509 5621.6104 190.56 PETTY CASH 213226 060509 5620.6406 257.76 323288 6/1112009 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 27,510.00 WATER PURCHASE 213227 060309 5913.6601 27,510.00 323289 611112009 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 19.88 CARBON DIOXIDE 213228 R105090129 5421.6406 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES LINE MARKING POWDER OFFICE SUPPLIES 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 22 Business Unit PATHS & HARD SURFACE FIELD MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 23 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 19.88 323290 611112009 124371 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 210.00 CONFERENCE & COMPETITION 213088 060209 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 210.00 323291 611112009 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 212893 50245 -2009 4075.4521 CONCESSION SALES VANVALKENBURG 35.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 212894 50011 -2009 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 35.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 213337 50265 -2009 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 105.00 323292 6/1112009 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 1,229.00 MN PARENT AD 213229 101873 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,229.00 - 323293 611112009 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 984.38 CRS 2 00005449 213230 59233 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 984.38 323294 611112009 101556 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC. 345.00 OLD FILE SHREDDING 213089 253427889 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 345.00 323295 6111/2009 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 319.50 HOSE REEL 00005741 212817 0080394 -IN 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 319.50 SPRAYER 00002031 213298 0080568 -IN 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 639.00 323296 611112009 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT 275.00 ACTOR FOR COMMERCIAL 213050 126430 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 275.00 323297 6/1112009 124362 MORRILL, SUSAN 18.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213019 060209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 18.20 323298 6/11/2009 102082 MPLS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COL 840.00 USE OF FORCE INSTRUCTION 213087 09-048 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 840.00 323299 6/1112009 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 176.62 SOLENOID, FLOW CONTROL 00005805 212818 671629 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 320.59 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001059 212819 672260 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 191.49 IRRIGATION PAIRTS 00005809 212820 672464 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 37.28 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005809 212821 672540 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 96.66 SOLENOID 00001059 212822 672281 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.07 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002016 213299 669758 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 863.71 323300 6/1112009 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 888.08 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 213231 16976 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 888.08 323301 611112009 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 99.60 GLUE STICKS, WHITE BOARD 00009026 213232 37425200 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 99.60 323302 6111/2009 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1,560.00 WELL HOUSE #20 PROJ 213300 #9 05480.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 1,060.00 WELL HOUSE #3 PROJ 213301 #10 05483.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX 2,620.00 323303 6/1112009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 49.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009034 213233 474845531 -001 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 49.12 323304 6/1112009 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 448.34 212895 W09040609 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 20.62 ARNESON 212896 W09040603 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.62 212896 W09040603 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 41.24 212896 W09040603 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 41.24 GREENHOUSE 212896 W09040603 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 72.59 212896 W09040603 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 82.48 212896 W09040603 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 82.62 212896 W09040603 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 103.10 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 212896 W09040603 1646.6188 TELEPHONFE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 103.37 212896 W09040603 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 108.79 HISTORICAL 212896 W09040603 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 123.72 212896 W09040603 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 147.64 212896 W09040603 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 288.68 212896 W09040603 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 590.16 212896 W09040603 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 2,275.21 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 25 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323305 6/1112009 118891 OLSON, LYNN 194.66 UNIFORM PURCHASE 213090 060409 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 194.66 323306 611112009 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 148.90 COOKIES 212897 81981292 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 202.67 COOKIES 213234 83549992 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 351.57 323307 611112009 117993 P & H SERVICES 69.05 REPAIR DEFECTIVE SPEAKER 213091 13151 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.05 323308 611112009 102440 PASS, GRACE 191.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213020 060209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 191.75 323309 611112009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,815.02 213132 822334D4N 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,207.50 - 213133 8223395 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,560.41 213134 8224092 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,404.97 213135 8224098 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.151.75 213136 8223344 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,815.02 213137 8223346 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,624.06 213138 8224101 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22,578.73 323310 6111/2009 124366 PEARSON, JACK 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/18/09 213004 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323311 611112009 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 297.55 212898 28752634 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 673.01 212899 28752627 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 473.80 213235 51015837 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,444.36 323312 6111/2009 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 2,478.25 BOULEVARD RESTORATION 00005735 213051 052809 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 688.00 REGRADE FRONT YARD 213302 052609 07100.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN S100 HALIFAX AV- 51ST TO 54TH 3,166.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 • Council Check Register Page - 26 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323313 6/11/2009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 511.30 212968 2759807 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 428.82 212969 2759808 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 851.20 212970 2759811 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 49.12 212971 2759809 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,445.33 212972 2759810 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 332.71 213139 276270 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,786.37 213140 2762718 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 51.12 213141 2762712 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,999.97 213142 2762719 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 587.10 213143 2759814 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 103.12 213144 2759806 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,406.43 213145 2759812 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,168.08 213365 2762714 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 747.62 213366 2762716 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 427.60 213367 2762713 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,827.11 213368 2762715 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 100.48 213369 2762717 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 102.24 213370 2762711 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18,925.72 323314 611112009 100119 PING 122.01 MERCHANDISE 213236 9770973 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 122.01 323315 6111/2009 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 375.03 BRAKES, CYLINDER 00005776 213052 1- 922236 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 375.03 323316 611112009 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 48.39 HOSES 00005770 212823 S1295119.001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.39 323317 6111/2009 100958 PLUNKET17S PEST CONTROL 44.36 PEST CONTROL 213303 1280171 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.36 323318 6/1112009 118430 POHLMAN, RIK 165.00 SPRINKLER HEAD REPAIR 213338 060209 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 165.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323319 6/1112009 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 120.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 213092 052809 2210.6123 120.00 323320 611112009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 213339 060609 1628.6235 350.00 323321 6111/2009 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. 176.48 CUSHION REPAIRS 00001087 213053 16079 1553.6530 176.48 323322 611112009 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 108.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008000 213237 241695 5521.6215 108.00 323323 6/1112009 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 600.10 LINERS, ROLL TOWELS 00002036 213238 4481 5630.6406 1,175.61 ROLL TOWELS, LINERS, TISSUE 00002237 213239 4465 5620.6511 1,775.71 323324 6/1112009 100186 PROULX, ADAM 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 213240 060509 5620.6201 100.00 323325 6/11/2009 116481 PUTTING GREENS OF MINNESOTA 4,460.99 E Z TEE MATS 00006242 213093 3 5424.6590 4,480.99 323326 6/1112009 123749 QUALITY SEASONS LAWN CARE SERV 567.64 4116 SUNNYSIDE RD 00005438 213304 REPAIRS 01213.1705.20 567.64 323327 611112009 100971 QUALITY WINE 928.90 212973 164456 -00 5822.5513 142.60 212974 164620 -00 5822.5512 2,420.90 212975 161388 -00 5862.5513 865:60 212976 161319 -00 5862.5513 615.20 212977 161318 -00 5842.5513 702.35 212978 161320 -00 5822.5513 1,757.83 212979 161202 -00 5822.5512 95.80- 212980 160076 -00 5822.5513 6110/2009 9:37:40 Page - 27 Subledger Account Description Business Unit MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE REPAIR PARTS SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK RANGE BALLS RANGE CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 28 6/11/2009 - 6111/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,429.43 213146 164614 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,230.37 213147 164619 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 309.20 213148 164668 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,224.10 213149 164454 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 633.60 213150 163040 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,050.70 213151 164615 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 692.40 213152 164455 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,905.56 213153 164669 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21,812.94 323328 6/1112009 123898 QWEST 78.47 952 929 -9549 212824 9549 -5/09 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 55.23 952 929 -0297 212825 0297 -5109 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 214.56 952 927 -8861 212826 8861 -5/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.39 213305 0146 -5109 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.08 213305 0146 -5/09 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 83.39 213305 0146 -5/09 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 98.18 213305 0146.5/09 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 106.09 213305 0146 -5/09 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 116.45 213305 0146 -5109 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.86 213305 0146 -5/09 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 164.52 213305 0146 -5/09 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 233.10 213305 0146 -5/09 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 264.69 213305 0146 -5/09 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 294.24 213305 0146 -5/09 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,154.60 213305 0146 -5109 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,138.85 323329 6111/2009 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 1,501.65 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001097 213054 554 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,501.65 323330 6/11/2009. 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN I 3,939.68 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 00008076 212900 0042775 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,974.51 REPAIR ICE RESURFACER 00008076 213241 0042796 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 5,914.19 323331 6/1112009 120036 RAMAKER & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,900.00 PROJECT CONSULTING 212827 3809 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 1,900.00 323332 6/ 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,336.50 CLEAR MAIN SEWER LINE 213242 11081 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,336.50 323333 611112009 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 403.44 AD FOR BID 212828 4174786 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 218.94 AD FOR BID 212829 4174785 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 218.94 AD FOR BID 213094 4178391 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 841.32 323334 611112009 124374 REMAX ADVISORS 34.18 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 213243 060309 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 34.18 323335 611112009 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 53.75 SPRING 00005427 212830 1045011 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 31.92 RECEIVER TUBE 00005778 213244 1046184 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 85.67 323336 6/11/2009 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 157.45 SOFTENER SALT 213055 00221431 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 605.99 SOFTENER SALT 00008095 213245 00221848 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 763.44 323337 611112009 124373 RYAN, JOHN 95.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 213246 060509 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 95.00 323338 6/1112009 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 112.41 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00001088 213056 MB02603740 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112.41 323339 6/1112009 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 68.08 BAKERY 212901 250400 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 68.08 323340 611112009 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 14.84 101= " ""9350 212831 053009 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.84 323341 6/1112009 124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE 632.14 LAWN CARE 213306 101 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE 632.14 6110/2009 9:37:40 Page - 29 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL TENNIS INSTRUCTION PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 140.00 PERFORMANCE 6/16109 213001 CITY OF EDINA 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 Council Check Register 323346 6111/2009 6/11/2009 - 6/1112009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323342 6111/2009 ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 102921 SAMPSON MILLER ADVERTISING INC 197.75 237.20 PLAQUE 00006284 212902 61131 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 237.20 213.00 CARPET CLEANING 213307 323343 6/11/2009 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 319.50 CARPET CLEANING 213308 591 5821.6162 40.20 COVER 00005386 213057 1023150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 26.09 BLADES, COVER, BRACKET 00005597 213058 1023151 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 66.29 173.48 WALK IN COOLER REPAIR 00006340 212903 323344 6/11/2009 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 320.58 WALK -IN COOLER REPAIR 00006340 213254 76241 33.36 LUMBER, WASHERS, SCREWS 00001063 213059 40751416 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 191.01 SHIMS, LUMBER 00001045 213060 40750532 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 105187 SOVELL, KATHLEEN 224.37 65.00 323345 6/1112009 5101.4413 103249 SHANNON, JIM ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Page - 30 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 140.00 PERFORMANCE 6/16109 213001 060109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 323346 6111/2009 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 197.75 PAINT 00008085 213247 6485 -6 5511.6532 PAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 197.75 323347 611112009 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTER 213.00 CARPET CLEANING 213307 592 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 319.50 CARPET CLEANING 213308 591 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 532.50 323348 6111/2009 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 173.48 WALK IN COOLER REPAIR 00006340 212903 75972 5421.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 320.58 WALK -IN COOLER REPAIR 00006340 213254 76241 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 494.06 323349 6/1112009 105187 SOVELL, KATHLEEN 65.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213021 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 32.3350 611112009 110977 SOW, ADAMA 193.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213022 060209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 193.70 323361 61' 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 45.33 GASOLINE 212832 052609 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 6/1012009 9:37 :40 Page - 31 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC PROGRAMS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 45.33 323352 6111/2009 101462 SPORT HALEY INC. 844.41 MERCHANDISE 00006404 213248 PSI- 143281 5440.5511 844.41 323363 611112009 104672 SPRINT 319.92 CARD READERS 212904 312188813 -018 1470.6151 319.92 323354 6/11/2009 101004 BPS COMPANIES 113.22 VALVE, TEFLON TAPE 00005795 212633 S2038077.001 1643.6530 582.25 DRINKING FOUNTAIN 00002240 213249 S2037186.001 5620.6406 695.47 323355 611112009 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 169.98 NE EDINA TRAFFIC STUDY 213309 6071 -15 1500.6103 169.98 323356 6/11/2009 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 948.57 DOME TOP 00005807 212834 16073 1645.6406 948.57 323357 611112009 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 209.59 BITS 00005300 213250 S171378 1301.6556 209.59 323358 6/11/2009 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 179.93 CORES KEYED 213095 MN- 507905 1400.6406 179.93 323359 611112009 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 250.00 S METRO PUBLIC SAFETY AD 213310 053109 7414.6103 250.00 323360 6111/2009 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 6.83 COPIER USAGE 213096 6836958 1400.6230 6.83 323361 611112009 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 105.29 MERCHANDISE 213251 329618 5440.5511 6/1012009 9:37 :40 Page - 31 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC PROGRAMS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 32 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 126.94 MERCHANDISE 213252 338088 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 18.39 PARTS 213253 333816 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 250.62 323362 6/11/2009 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 600.00 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 00016102 213255 1183292 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 150.00 LIQUOR AD 213311 1183293 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 150.00 LIQUOR AD 213311 1183293 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 150.00 LIQUOR AD 213311 1183293 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,050.00 323363 611112009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 935.00 212981 JM8371 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 439.00 212982 D8615 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,374.00 323364 611112009 120595 T- MOBILE 41.63 SURVEY PHONE 213312 052709 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 41.63 323365 611112009 124363 TENBROEK, WILLIAM 6.18 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213023 060209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.18 323366 6/11/2009 101028 TERRY ANN SALES CO 464.34 WATER CUPS 213256 2461 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 464.34 323367 611112009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 366.30 212905 543855 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 118.20 212983 543472 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,955.40 212984 543471 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 240.00 213257 71960 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 456.40 213258 544930 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,225.20 213371 544574 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 95.50 213372 545074 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 28.50 213373 544579 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7,485.50 323368 6/1112009 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 110.00 OUTREACH PROGRAM 213340 4768214 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THF' - -R 110.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6110/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 33 6/1112009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323369 611112009 112876 TIEMAN, PATRICIA 81.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213024 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 81.25 323370 6/1112009 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 102.50 DRAFT MINUTES 5/19/09 212835 M17042 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 102.50 323371 611112009 101474 TITLEIST 1,593.97 MERCHANDISE 213259 0692281 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 128.51 MERCHANDISE 213260 0693594 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,615.06 MERCHANDISE 213261 0700514 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 126.59 MERCHANDISE 213262 0694562 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,464.13 323372 611112009 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 1,992.14 BROWNDALE BRIDGE REPAIR 213313 000200901338 10091.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge 901.60 WM LINING MORNINGSIDE 213314 00020090139 05481.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -481 M'SIDE H20MAIN PIPELINE 2,213.16 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 213315 000200901340 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,518.35 FRANCE AVE SIDEWALK 213316 000200901341 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE 7,625.25 323373 6111/2009 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 55.91 WELDING GAS 00002004 213317 264824 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 55.91 323374 611112009 124364 TOLONEN, LORI 39.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213025 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 323375 611112009 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 155.00 212985 220397 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 150.00 212986 219762 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 305.00 323376 6/11/2009 100682 TRUGREEN LAWNCARE 58.58 WEED CONTROL 00005981 212906 683735 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 106.50 WEED CONTROL 00005982 212907 683156 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 106.50 WEED CONTROL 00005982 212908 683155 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 159.75 WEED CONTROL 00005982 212909 683154 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 431.33 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 34 6/11/2009 - 6111/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323377 611112009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 699.26 MOTOR, BELT, BLADES 00005952 213263 JI15654 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 699.26 323378 611112009 120675 ULTRAMAX 716.00 AMMO 213097 104848 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 716.00 323379 6111/2009 105911 UPPER MIDWEST COMMUNITY POLICI 49.00 TERRORISM CLASS 213098 1058 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.00 323380 611112009 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 33.83 SHIPPING 213061 TRAN:4485 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 33.83 323381 6111/2009 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 259.08 CUST 114300 213264 053109 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 281.16 CUST 114300 213264 053109 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 3,284.47 CUST 114300 213264 053109 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 3,824.71 323382 6/1112009 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 12.28 PAGER 213318 S6096083F 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 12.28 323383 611112009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 352.13 TISSUE, ROLL TOWEL 00005804 212836 122786 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.40 STRAWS, CUPS 212910 123053 -00 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,092.81 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 212910 123053 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 116.26 LIQUOR BAGS 213062 123052 -01 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 174.11 LIQUOR BAGS 213063 123052 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 55.77 UTENSILS, SOAP 00007513 213099 123051 -00 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 398.42 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 213099 123051 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 13.21- CREDIT 213319 123828CM 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 2,416.69 323384 611112009 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 102.99 CELL PHONE 212911 2016555552 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 102.99 R55CKREG LOG20000 694.00 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 323391 611112009 Council Check Register 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Page - 35 6/11/2009 — 6/11/2009 213065 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323385 6/1112009 COST OF GOODS SOLD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC 56.13- INV NO 24793457 CREDIT 213066 RFA 26162651 5630.5510 1,050.00 LEASE CARTS 00006278 213265 42210 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 1,050.00 323392 611112009 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 323366 6/11/2009 101786 VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICES 236.43 BULBS 00001080 212838 15129962 -00 1375.6530 566.00 REPAIR PROTECTION SERVER 00001090 213064 4790 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 566.00 323393 611112009 124365 WADSWORTH, JIM 323387 611112009 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 130.65 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213026 060109 5101.4413 63.21 GLOVES, LOCKS, GLASSES 00005132 212837 227215 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.21 323394 6/11/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 323388 6/1112009 124381 VILLAFANA, SYLVIANE 3.45 PARTIAL SEASON TICKET REFUND 213341 060209 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 50.00 PARTIAL SEASON TICKET REFUND 213341 060209 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 53.45 323389 6/11/2009 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 270.00 213374 27221 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 60.00- 213375 5.27.09 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 210.00 323390 611112009 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 694.00 213376 12825 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES PARKING RAMP ART CENTER REVENUES 2,308.05 212987 218781 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 694.00 323391 611112009 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 227.13 213065 25632615 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 2,422.63 213065 25632615 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 56.13- INV NO 24793457 CREDIT 213066 RFA 26162651 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,593.63 323392 611112009 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 236.43 BULBS 00001080 212838 15129962 -00 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS 236.43 323393 611112009 124365 WADSWORTH, JIM 130.65 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 213026 060109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 130.65 323394 6/11/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES PARKING RAMP ART CENTER REVENUES 2,308.05 212987 218781 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 36 6/11/2009 - 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323.15 213154 219253 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 265.35 213155 219163 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,896.55 323398 611112009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 323395 611112009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 481.40 264.00 212988 275638 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 209.49 213156 275538 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 562.97 213157 276329 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,497.68 213377 276328 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 113.12 213378 276327 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9.33- 213379 43371 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS. SOLD WINE 2,637.93 237678 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING Business Unit VERNON SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 323396 611112009 117462 WINECONNECTINC. 158.69 WEB - JUNE 2009 213320 244 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 158.69 323398 611112009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 481.40 212989 233612 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 829.49 212990 233611 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 28.94 212991 233610 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 53.55 212992 237681 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 158.15 212993 237679 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 210.35 212994 237678 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 1,836.23 212995 233601 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,842.54 212996 233604 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,636.02 212997 233599 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING. 3,106.15 212998 233600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,530.95 213158 236478 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,822.55 213159 237683 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.10 213160 237578 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,555.25 213161 237682 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 183.77 213162 237684 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 653.30 213163 236477 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 75.00 213164 233602 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 56.09 213165 237676 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,815.14 213166 237677 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,415.63 213167 236475 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 41.33 213168 230839 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,948.45 213169 237675 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,207.35 213170 236474 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 979.72 213171 237674 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6110/2009 9:37:40 Council Check Register Page - 37 6/11/2009 - 611112009 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 888.50 213172 236473 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 100.83 213380 235835 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 37,529.78 323399 6/11/2009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,751.00 212999 229480 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,239.50 213173 229881 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 423.80 213174 229883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,414.30 323400 6/11/2009 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 4,859.00 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 213321 01686 -130 -9 01239.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -239 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 4,859.00 323402 611112009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 134.22 51- 4156445 -0 212839 197452366 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 84.75 51- 5634814 -2 212840 197481072 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 124.78 51- 50054543 212841 197280049 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 33.50 51- 8997917 -7 212842 197369838 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 308.41 51- 8324712 -5 212843 197348949 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 33.77 51- 68922245 212844 197324599 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 33.60 51- 65410842 212845 197498357 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 137.01 51- 8987646 -8 212846 197547553 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 500.00 51- 6046826 -0 212847 197303010 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.93 51- 8102668 -0 212848 197345095 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 67.89 51- 8526048 -8 212849 197354885 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,898.58 51- 5547446 -1 212850 197292975 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 1,273.41 51- 5107681 -4 212851 197283018 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 59.59 51- 6692497 -0 212852 197317633 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 282.34 51- 60501842 212853 197485870 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 370.84 51- 5938955 -6 212854 197487146 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 1,227.86 51- 6223269 -1 212855 197309387 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 4,750.93 51- 4966303 -6 212856 197469123 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 510.00 51- 4827232 -6 212857 197634317 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 31,181.81 51- 4621797 -2 212858 197274491 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15,381.43 51- 4888627 -1 213266 197971839 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,102.41 51- 4159265 -8 213322 197268131 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PBTF OCCUPANCY 1,098.15 51- 5847121 -5 213323 198152387 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 6,339.05 51- 6824328 -7 213324 198499160 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 299.77 51- 6121102 -5 213325 198155251 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9,599.58 51- 9207844 -7 213342 197197441 05480.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM -480 NEW WELL 020 PHASE 2 77,869.61 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/11/2009 — 6/11/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323403 6/1112009 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 106.80 MAY USAGE 213267 040725007 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 106.80 323404 6111/2009 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 323405 6/1112009 79.60 79.60 323406 611112009 23.00 23.00 930,719.06 213381 5085 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE IBUPROFEN 00006344 213268 54064689 101636 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CERTIFICATE RENEWAL- J HERSHEY 213382 060909 Grand Total 5842.5513 5410.6610 6/1012009 9:37:40 Page - 38 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 930,719.06 Total Payments 930,719.06 GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 611112009 - 6/11/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 115,147.03 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 382.70 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 141.79 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 22,906.08 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,992.14 05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,292.21 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,417.53 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 13,029.17 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 35,585.67 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 24,906.65 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 15,920.62 05800 LIQUOR FUND 275,664.85 05900 UTILITY FUND 409,797.48 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,406.66 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,128.48 Report Totals 930,719.06 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policj'es and Procedures date 1 ( a 6/10/2009 9:39:09 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 4/28/09 - 5/25/09 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/04/27 $470.05 DVD DUPLICATOR E- FILLIATE 800 - 892 -0164 CA 5125.6710 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/04/29 $30.00 TRAINING MINNESOTA LICENSED BEV 651 - 772 -0910 MN 5410.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/04/29 $30.00 TRAINING MINNESOTA LICENSED BEV 651 - 772 -0910 MN 5410.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/04/30 $23.97 SUMMER REC SUPPLIES AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/01 $11.99 COMPUTER CABLE E- FILLIATE 800- 892 -0164 CA 5125.6710 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/02 $61.94 WAVESLIDE AND HOSE TARGET 00021899 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/04 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES POSTAGE 800 - 468 -8454 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/08 $430.20 REPLACEMENT PARTS CUTTING EDGE CREA00 OF 651- 2098600 MN 5620.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/11 $692.73 MAINTENANCE PARTS NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMK BURNSVILLE MN 5631.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/12 $67.50 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM BLOOMINGTON CIVIC THEA 952 - 5638574 MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/13 $29.36 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES RENTAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/13 $30.00 TRAINING MINNESOTA LICENSED BEV 651 - 772 -0910 MN 5410.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/14 $125.00 SUMMER REC PROGRAM U OF M ARBORETUM ADLT I CHASKA MN 1624.6406 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/02 $175.00 CONTINUING ED REGISTRATION U OF M CCE 612- 625 -4259 MN 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/02 $175.00 CONTINUING ED REGISTRATION U OF M CCE 612- 625 -4259 MN 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/19 $23.00 CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATIC AIRPORT EXPRESS - MIDW CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/20 $11.93 CONFERENCE MEAL PALMER HOUSE STARBUCK CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/21 $13.96 CONFERENCE MEAL BENNIGAN'S CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/21 $4.18 CONFERENCE MEAL PALMER HOUSE STARBUCK CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/22 $17.71 CONFERENCE MEAL EXCHEQUER PUB CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/22 $7.86 CONFERENCE MEAL PALMER HOUSE STARBUCK CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/23 $9.62 CONFERENCE MEAL CORNER BAKERY 01101823 CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 MIKE SIITARI 2009/05/06 $521.10 DISPATCH 911 CELL PHONES VERIZON WRLS M3105 -01 EDINA MN 2310.6103 JOHN WALLIN 2009/04/28 $189.64 PLANNING MEETING DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1140.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2009/04/28 $130.02 COUNCIL WORKSHOP PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/01 $91.03 COUNCIL RETREAT PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/01 $64.65 COUNCIL RETREAT PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/03 $143.03 PUBLIC WORK LAPTOP BATTRY HP SERVICES 800- 325 -5372 CA 5913.6530 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/05 $118.82 COUNCIL WORKSHOP PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/10 $2,590.50 INTERNAL TAPE DRIVE HP SERVICES 800 - 325 -5372 CA 1554.6710 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/12 $38.00 PLANNING CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/15 $238.04 ASSESSING MEETING PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/15 $89.90 ASSESSING MEETING CARIBOU COFFEE CO # 128 EDINA JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/16 ($799.33) RETURN OF DEFECTIVE PART HP SERVICES 800 - 325 -5372 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/19 $35.00 PLANNING CONFERENCE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 800 - 321 -5011 JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/19 $118.33 COUNCIL WORKSHOP PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P JOHN WALLIN 2009/05/20 $15.00 COUNCIL WORKSHOP PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P $6,124.73 MN 1160.6106 MN 1190.6106 CA 1554.6710 DC 1140.6104 MN 1100.6106 MN 1100.6106 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pollgiesyand orocadurms., -dnta & L Flo 4? er REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VII. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: June 16, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Petition — Country Club Action ® Motion Neighborhood Roadway ❑ Resolution Reconstruction Project ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Deny petition based on that adequate public process has taken place regarding the design and incorporation of traffic calming modifications prior to award of bids for the Country Club Area Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction project. Info /Background: The attached petition is for a redesign of the intersection of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road. The petition is requesting that the intersection be changed to be identical to the Casco Avenue and Country Club Road intersection, see attached plan sheet no. 93. The Country Club neighborhood has been studied extensively since 1993, see attached History of NE Edina Traffic. As you will recall, Staff initiated this project in 2005 to address utility concerns within the Edina Country Club District. A public hearing was held on July 19, 2005. At this public hearing the City Council decided to delay the project until a transportation plan was adopted for the Northeast Area of Edina. The Edina Transportation Commission completed the Northeast Edina Transportation Study (NEETS) in 2006, which the Edina City Council adopted in 2006. The City Council then approved the implementation of the NEETS at the December 4, 2007, Public Hearing for the Country Club project. However, prior to the award of bid for this project, the City Council called for a public hearing to re- evaluate the Residential Area Safety Improvements (RASI's) as called out in the NEETS. The City Council then adopted a revised layout without the RASI's at the April 21, 2008 Public Hearing. The motion was: Member Housh moved that the Council accept the compromise plan presented by the Country Club representatives provided that i.) sidewalks be installed across existing islands as recommended by the Northeast Edina Traffic Study, ii.) the final location of crosswalks be determined by the City Engineer based upon the conceptual locations shown in the compromise plan, and iii.) the proposed reduction in speed limits to 25 mph be deferred to a later date. Further, i.) all recommended vertical and horizontal realignments of streets in the northeast Edina study area outside of the Country Club district be deleted as planned improvements provided that ii.) pedestrian - related improvements in this area be pursued at the appropriate time. Further, pedestrian- related improvements for the Morningside area be undertaken per the recommendations of the Morningside Neighborhood Association with the understanding that the stop signs proposed for the Grimes and Sunnyside intersection will be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee for review and recommendation. Member Swenson seconded the motion, but withdrew her second during the discussion at which time Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Staff is very concerned that by accepting this petition it will re -open the discussion for traffic calming within the Country Club. Therefore, staff is recommending that Council deny accepting this petition based on the extensive public process that has taken place prior to awarding the bid for this project. GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2008 \ENG 08 -1 Country Club Reconstr\ADMIN\MISC \June 2009 Petition\20090616 rrform petition.doc A.9 r 9� I v 1r_z V� Cn O ) 1 !PF oo �.r RPoax 1888 The, City Council City of Edina Petition RECEIVED JUN -5 29 CITY OF EDINA Petition Instructions This petition form is to be used to ask the Edina City Council to consider the following types of improvements: SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY (WITHOUT PERMANENT STREET SURFACING) SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHTING or another improvement you describe (called OTHER on this form). You may use another petition form if you wish but the city council may reject such petitions unless they contain the following information: 1. Type of improvement(s) requested, e.g., SIDEWALK, STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, ETC. 2. Precise locations(s) of the requested improvements. 3. A statement that all who sign the petition understand that the city council may assess the costs of these improvements against the properties benefiting from the improvements in amounts determined by the Council. 4. Printed name of property owner, owner's signature and phone number, and property address. 5. Signature of person circulating the petition. If you have questions, please call the City Clerk at 952- 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. DEBRA MANGEN CITY CLERK APRIL 2008 w9�rA. City of Edina, Minnesota DATE IV ok e' CITY COUNCIL VW:C b )0 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 �� J•'kW�r,M�'�'� (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD °5 CITY pF �)11 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ENGINEERINGOe ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING F] CURB AND GUTTER ONLY F-1 PERMANENT STREET OTHER:r SURFACING WITH ��', 'fit,Scc CURB AND GUTTER SlC r-*-a k-r d To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME - OCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME 7I,4c,fecA0A 01 Q^t)C4 Af I,41 -J - and eOu ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS - and ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) zsa PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) y 6 i 8 —pre xe I AVvL ��i✓ ��x�.� w��/ �� -t��v ��x,4�v`in�� � (o � � �I�rx. -Pii -i�� L) This petition was circulated by: -S K le J NAME ADDRESS PHONE /// There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE V-V OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) V1 c � Lt J L c,,. —TI A.�w This petition was circulated by: E�oAc7 �I- �72� PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) �L6I ko- 9 52 A„-e_ `i2, zI (e,. ivy Cl— �d etzzs Ave �o 13 GYP -�c-� c� 0�5' —OC �� �- L �- 40/� P/:rXt-/ /4e ql 3o n R e-,cg-z- i/ SPAatn "d C--( rz l-r- q6,23 NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form.. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for reficsing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 RECEIVED Petition for the Realignment of the Intersection of JW -5 X09 Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road CITY OF EDINA cnar_imFFRING DEPT. The residents surrounding the corner of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road petition for a change in the alignment of the intersection of Country Club Road and Drexel Avenue. We are asking for the intersection to be "T "ed off in a manner similar to the alignment of the intersection of Casco Avenue and Country Club Road. History: The original safety improvement proposal, from the traffic study of NE Edina reported in 2007, recommended a realignment of the intersection at Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road. The proposal would have resulted in a widening of the island at that intersection. The city council repealed its approval of the Traffic Safety Plan in April 2008 after residents on surrounding streets objected to any changes that they felt could potentially increase traffic flow on other streets. Current Situation: We understand that this petition is coming very late in the process of reconstruction of our roads; however we are moved to petition now given our concern for the safety of cars and pedestrians at the intersection. The road being tom up and partially closed has not changed traffic habits at the intersection. People still turn left going north on Drexel at a high speed seemingly unaffected by the obvious poor condition of the road. We are hopeful that "T "ing off the intersection will force traffic to make a more deliberate and thus safer left turn onto Drexel rather than the "sling shot" left turn they now make. Since this change does not involve a horizontal measure we don't feel this will shift traffic onto any neighboring streets. Thank you for your consideration. h f r r , r I I m 0 N aI& �y C �o� -aye C$ ,w Q` r a M\ o`. ISED CROSSWALK E DETAIL T36+0p DREXEL AVENUE J CASCO AVENUE I� SEE SHEET 94 _ _ �- SEE SHEET 89 i G I it — � j 11 i_ 1 i I '' i'`s =•^ k dO1S I,_j t O c 1 del L__u; G f ` a 41 +00 •,) , t Zs, 146 po f f-S�� •, 1 V ice' 7 1 FICS It d01S � __ - -- o I I j i I 1 p RAISED CROSSWALK J\ I I J f SEE DETAIL �--��I I 1 1 Q it i i j� _I I 1 WOODDALE AVENUE SEE SHEET 106 SOD 2s O 25 So W.00 2s feet 505C KEYED NOTES ® BRICK CROSS WALK A CURB OSEDPPEDESTRIAN © PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) - EPDXY Q FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN I`' EXISTING SIGN SE E A 4' DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXYA PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LT -THRU) - EPDXY Q SALVAGE AND RE- INSTALL PROPOSED SIGN TO BE REPLACED 0 4' SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY Q SALVAGE TO CITY OF ED1NA- K 4° CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT SAME LOCATION AS EXISTING Q4° SOLID LINE WHITE - EPDXY A24" SOLID LINE WHITE - EPDXY /L\ STREET SIGN ON LIGHTPOLE PROPOSED SIGN IN NEW LOCATION D COUNTRY CLUB ROAD Q STREET SIGN ON ASSEMBLY PROPOSED LIGHTPOLE LOCATION BRUCE AVENUE ARDEN AVENUE 1V SEE SHEET 87 SEE SHEET 82 L.�` 1�p ' �ybv I I, i � I / V V 1 � ��f' Y° ) � f • �':'1 1 9_ _ I I _� __ -` ;fdOlS za Za dp1S G I ; lj, SOWK COti m CON _ (< ` + ! STOP OP ° -STOP i'o o G I po 1 i i y 1 Aq ED CROSSWALK_ _- I�d ! AI CROSSWALK EE- DETAIL ' f� N 'f AIL _.� No I o } r - F ii 1 '-ri �i i PARKING v rh � SIC( _j ' I i `i t--- - � � y •-• 11 i r - -1__1 `j! �ikn --- __ _. � - �- � �^ BRUCE AVENUE ARDEN AVENUE SEE SHEET 87 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SEE SHEET 82 CM /C$ /AS / R4 A J T NT IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY DESIGNER: ME OR UNDER YY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM COUNTRY CLUB AREA FILE N0. ESSIO AL ENGwEER UNDER (@I STREET, SIGNING &STRIPING CHECKED BY: PJP /CN /MK SEWER WATER AND STREET STATION 135 +00 TO 147 +50 A- EDINA0503 THE LAWS F T E 10901RE0 CWCLE DRIVE •200 YWNETONKA, YN 557A7-9100 I I DATE APPROVED BY• Lcanaeo o avonm er �M B PH 952 912 -2600 FAX 952 -912 -2601 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MK N0. BY DATE REVISIONS MICHAEL KOTILA LICNe. 15254 �EH PH 800 T74 -6757 RECONSTRUCTION 2/12/08 DESIGN TEAM Intea ai t,re: (30 CITY OF EDINA History o f NE Edina Traffic Residential Area Safety Improvements in Northeast Edina 1993 2005 2006 2007 April 9, 2008 wh 1993 1 200012001 Residential Area Safety Improve Cuwwup thw4 nherin cwwreuv. w. Trwmr usw.. n!ab a,' :Oa ' -wb b as s Jhah6 wd!1 —1 arim pelitw ;Cc, . -_try Club Counal to ens V a r ca lcsidents mnwllent to wmk ragadrng traffic wlh—d- to sway - tram 'xmu:ale a aancc pin^ E- ng yield sgns reap le:a dssolved e removed and .a Aug_s'. 2DDI replaced w4h a sI - trapb, nveagwng Mang —I plan E =sb•g yragu'a w apo,0ad' as r—,J d r Study hsdnds nere'nnd5td by me Task Force a' Y400ddale A— rc9'sT:_Ymj dl :' dpC and County CIA Tier Two: ',1C roadway n arracbon rnpoytmaa' Iunoe,."l Road end arc e" Tier Three Apply Fesdmba Ara Shay 4rprovenms to Nonhoas• lVoodi AvanuE en. "ht, CIUD Area S:nryede Road C A area as pan of Its upL 1ng pubk usity retonsbuCOpn 2002!2003 1 December 2003 1 Fall 2041 - Ixrhb 'I c ty C:+u';A tams Ili, b the Ega A- Tasx Eama 1-- tipb1itt n .--it d Wale' man Fxx ,. 'r .t owes Comm ss -on breaks and "'WY = a 1 '1' Aran The raw Il. Obdtagaf in the I11�0.ads Nsl'-at on I.'ay 25 2005 ountry Club Aran C,ty Idma. not a, future study invabgaing trapb, nveagwng sbdir am dents: w apo,0ad' as r—,J d r Study me tesx'WM of by me Task Force public ubhbm in the rc9'sT:_Ymj dl :' dpC Country Cluo Area Tier Two: ',1C roadway n arracbon rnpoytmaa' Iunoe,."l rapt :. u!.,ues r IM Tier Three Apply Fesdmba Ara Shay 4rprovenms to Nonhoas• a puesbormd", 11 "ht, CIUD Area LansWtanl Lost ConsNtanl Coll Consulienl Cosl apprdxlmetey S I.tDO approximatwy 514,500 apprpxinpwwy 535.DDD (Tae Sudy Cos! approxiMaay 51 h UGO; 1993 January 7, 2005 1 May 10, 2005 Ttw Cly sends r County Chub sea kcal T"M' Tc.k F... t-innw_ aan Rrc Progeny --and residents are sent an and rmdmts of hAtabor r. the Mai Me Country Club tc all" an Open Aran The raw Il. liu— al City Hal formal annourtces on I.'ay 25 2005 the beg ming of a ors: alp ^ - : ".'1 , I" study invabgaing Fdna SaroCrlw,1 the ieasibihty or w apo,0ad' as r—,J d r Study rerrohstruoug all ol!nn public ubhbm in the 1.1 One: mph —Melt L f r y' 1301unoa'weY, Country Cluo Area Tier Two: ',1C roadway n arracbon rnpoytmaa' Iunoe,."l The newslella --le, Tier Three Apply Fesdmba Ara Shay 4rprovenms to Nonhoas• a puesbormd", 11 E dire s Neiroorhoods (•ada' Cnmdera im for me Corey gamer Input rergard 'g C A area as pan of Its upL 1ng pubk usity retonsbuCOpn sperfit abler and p'4cc1 a' errs April 21 M Pubic InprPRnenl HearV) sVee: igniting sway 11 alas bake for rnpal on l he !rgu:e above was taker, from the study because 4 sdren,acaly poesble enhancamarb shows to lh— lend anproeoh biker by the Stu dy L^ a0&— L eonhe bf the exabrg tiorneas: Ebna bwk a— TER One and Tit. ere Lndaivey pedaNan oassmgs in Fgu:e IC arse stows me eppox•male rocaams o To -hree me Country Club sea :n -,bored .a,,. steed hurnp5 a ii all fetes !small 1993 January 7, 2005 1 May 10, 2005 Ttw Cly sends r County Chub sea krACF rwwsle! :e1 .'. Progeny --and Me property owners residents are sent an and rmdmts of hAtabor r. the Mai Me Country Club tc all" an Open Aran The raw Il. liu— al City Hal formal annourtces on I.'ay 25 2005 the beg ming of a ors: alp ^ - : ".'1 , I" study invabgaing Fdna SaroCrlw,1 the ieasibihty or w apo,0ad' as r—,J d r Study rerrohstruoug all ol!nn public ubhbm in the 1.1 One: mph —Melt L f r y' 1301unoa'weY, Country Cluo Area Tier Two: ',1C roadway n arracbon rnpoytmaa' Iunoe,."l The newslella --le, Tier Three Apply Fesdmba Ara Shay 4rprovenms to Nonhoas• a puesbormd", 11 E dire s Neiroorhoods (•ada' Cnmdera im for me Corey gamer Input rergard 'g C A area as pan of Its upL 1ng pubk usity retonsbuCOpn sperfit abler and p'4cc1 a' errs April 21 M Pubic InprPRnenl HearV) sVee: igniting sway 11 alas bake for rnpal on l he !rgu:e above was taker, from the study because 4 sdren,acaly poesble enhancamarb shows to lh— lend anproeoh biker by the Stu dy L^ a0&— L eonhe bf the exabrg tiorneas: Ebna bwk a— TER One and Tit. ere Lndaivey pedaNan oassmgs in Fgu:e IC arse stows me eppox•male rocaams o To -hree me Country Club sea :n -,bored .a,,. steed hurnp5 a ii all fetes !small to b"' a;mmmodale swans cents �sla,d ­­q chp reakgrrea x4a aetbai Ile needs of cape Cerny, hall[ urdE reiaeC nle sect— ard uoevaa —art -6 Club areas poperty pvners and I drwls Std) V'�raburn T—ho', ou: to me pubk uwough. Input gained May 25, 2005 1 July 1, 2005 Country Club e•ea Counuy Club erica Property avhers and Pr.Wy ornpers and residents ad- an residents arc sent an open hone at Clty nvilatan in the mall IC. Hall to learn mere spend a pubk hear — about a,e Wa'C41y w. Cry Hw1 m Jul, 11 d a put- ul4ey 2005 Tt ; v :at,x ne— IrJ'.u. p lit , ors: alp ^ - : ".'1 , I" whira¢'y xhedul. Fdna SaroCrlw,1 for he summer Of 2006 ad 2007 At this" n f,— tE ..I! of repY>_SStru__ ^inn 'A" W tots poled unfs ectrna,ed Indwdua' speoal ard S1 -r -,also -[!"Mnsiv",.i s]rtdulas wae pre Ma d Conwtanl Cost approcimalely $252.000 i ..•'[� retnnrae July 19, 2005 1 November 6, 2006 k' Itquwed ev 'he City C ours t ado b b! tonppWW Normns! Ei T,si SLAY lArhresola Slatules Clap. 429 Conti to ado•ess long -term cornpants bon arse ro~% regarding C "t, a— property, traffic voumes and speeds an hi udenba steels in Norlbeest owners and,aderb Edina t ^.e study evalualed'rathr and 58Wy identified .J.nd x Public He 'vg fw!ent:a solu!hons for the w'oundrg aha.al strbeb a-d 9: Cit, hell. At this -91t orhoous c b. and Often , eo ii—i :ed impacts heenng They povid d o,pn 10 me City Cp:nc, ' fK' np ;rwrna'b to Nonrreasl Elena kh- a th - abow whe a not w apo,0ad' as r—,J d r Study to poread wrin We reeonstadpn a to 1.1 One: mph —Melt L f r y' 1301unoa'weY, publi lmetms r. the Tier Two: ',1C roadway n arracbon rnpoytmaa' Iunoe,."l Country Cbhb e,oa Tier Three Apply Fesdmba Ara Shay 4rprovenms to Nonhoas• E dire s Neiroorhoods (•ada' Cnmdera im for me Corey Aher corn"'nng the C A area as pan of Its upL 1ng pubk usity retonsbuCOpn plopaty byNr and p'4cc1 a' errs April 21 M Pubic InprPRnenl HearV) rcel0enl hi ma C" Cl ch— ouno l he !rgu:e above was taker, from the study because 4 sdren,acaly to proceed weh only shows to lh— lend anproeoh biker by the Stu dy L^ a0&— ­y —o- pubic v tiorneas: Ebna bwk a— TER One and Tit. ere Lndaivey uu ty Ia tried- Fgu:e IC arse stows me eppox•male rocaams o To -hree In me Country Club :n -,bored .a,,. steed hurnp5 a ii all fetes !small ce and Raft study swans cents �sla,d ­­q chp reakgrrea x4a aetbai cap be colvetM for hall[ urdE reiaeC nle sect— ard uoevaa —art -6 Normoac: Edna TM befenca o' ma public Std) V'�raburn T—ho', ou: to me pubk uwough. Input gained uady:aetorpsblrtbon at IN. open nwses two business owns meali and one! pond w the Canty Pubic hearing The C ty also, nvrad the pabopalon o! marry other Club ales Is pa: on nap stakeholders Ic participate n a Study Ad,hwy Cummmee (SAC I to peni tip become guide me dNaopneM d the Study' ard to rucommond rnpovbmonts a 4e treffr study to the Edna Dl y Colinas upon Me Study s rnnpeton Thoso invited to pa,bW. a In the SAC mdudeo me Edme Tlanspon,it- Comrniwor, leadents Lorin Edna S: Lours Pak and%nn -apae Iepesenlat- from mice tor.— areas stop pan the cubes of EOM. St Louis Park and I J'h bdia ono stay eom'a bbih County ard WWI Consutanl Cos! approximately S114.00D 2005 September 10, 2007 The C4) sands VY le L" N: E L the property owren and resoont5 or the Country Gut 4— The late, ­'A the progeny owners end asldants Ina: the Northeast Edina'ralk Sway was adopted by the : ey C hcR Tneefo e, pepa'aoon of the study n— Itgang the wasnrry a Is oh.ii 'g a1 9 the NNc uli!- rn Mt Country Club Nara w.11 rww reshape October 9, 2007 I n."je- roevet- Board —mil s hsterec Id a P! —tab- on are. rawSOM iC toe Coun:ry at area preyed stn 2005 11 mt-le, to P. —datpn feed m how ne n iai amz sally mp•pverrents have been a0dec Its the C—i i aEa b.. M me found in the NorJreas'. Edna Transpptal:on Study The Bead brooded Input or how to best fd menu residenLal area safey improvements into If CO LrV Club area October 15, 2007 ��arapurtwcr Comnksslcn embers Won- to e pte5enlalon o,­ droll zto the LC-.:,y b area pose. since 2005 In paducule, the p taon loaned or how re v.,*.' .. safely apryvanert, hN been boOM to tM County C'. area tastiC o me rex-" pen0am^s Iqn n in tK Nat'..eesl Ebha 1' anspd9eto' Sway them.. p'orded np:it a, host' bas• M Ine 1-5e 1. a! area saely arwovanems mL the Country Cwt area 5 etae: nb'avk i a ' y October 31, 21 C—t,y Club if popaty olerers to aHand an ups horse N Cny he No a'noir 14 21 :y Improvements in Northeast Edina r 4, as kW`u f - am } September 10. 2001 WOW 1.2007 Ock" 11, 2007 October 21, 2007 November 17, 2007 November 14l 2007 November 15, 2007 December I, 2007 January 11. 2006 Jame wry 24, 200! March 6, 2001 March 18 2008 March 28. 200E April /, 2001 Apr8 0. 2008 Apr 21 200E he Cey sm ev _bdaa F,.,tw oya .W T wrspodaeon Lo wv Club ane rwAa9e Prove *r CP nbT CYb red _'anspodA- CO­— As,.grad by sou "ey Cx..... Country LWO area TM Cp dpVW bdl CxY own ruaewa me ,,,:t'IV all 4c+yas Proprly and Ixdaness Prtgrty an0 dde teas Y ` e Ire Gard mefnbrs btmed Com-- paperly owrors rd Oaxd -m ,1W 1 papery owrdvs env rnerrbers hele c! b e I.bnrfeaala Sy pcpvj onms e-d popery Oedre erd for M Cw" Dub arras n mvsyyr, enc rerdmb dmrs and rmyomb oamrs and naderb - ... poferry owron end IT a pesmeem. on nwrbrs bslHletl W a ferermis src eml ar 1. a pesmtw- rsrde .1e d a. pesrMMen m me b"I Chmte 129 Coun•.n -eseerO. art sea an neMenb aMnd an rev proletl TM �� br ro d9'�' r v.mceu Edry re d hanM -Edina d Nvv." Ella - ­I-r" or de C: uy de". rdwvon Ito rc P ..Mm- r drab xrvAM,dr. n tlM mad er me final olr !o open Muse r Coy pan Yb add ,.sloops area CIO ra popery n m. n re —1 W nlormaeom meelnp apprefd tow bddr Lac red r.AAC xeaY serf r rnaM,v - are sail an nwybm rMrrO e- opm noose Cleo Agee ',.1.w Cord Club ha reasaw W me la Mlend M Bdd .c j. a b, u NM' W tom rrae Ie a waved res b ew ores and lescW% M:er,d n :.' b-b1M M Nat W meet wee, h IM r PAU �� �� W y Country opn ely Cal' P� ,ode rw Twos r< Iw mad Id bl:r,a an r. era mM b ahrd a r CAy Hat W ,saeueMe records mtr p apely poled — M Club erw Vol tens huwie M Gty Net on safely _.o'oveme',b about the 1."Ny Country Cab r teed antra a Pub,. H.,N rtyMmp al Gty YM rymMrs d Iy 0es9n aw Sm. aW d Saxe Open Nouee k C IY pAhc heamg N PAY t1 n 01- ab.K T. —m all msdmts "I pro<ulr. the 2005 W W.W. e,e r:d.9-,ber 14 207.7 to am E .^ CIA d a POk Aky . tw ... M ko,% M WON A: the m Ja ury 2e 2COE. ,err and,— ere �au� Mrd m Cry o 0 aeodea W Nall on Apo 5 YX, Hw m App 21.2110E Uv. wed gpoacr Ina'. ee N."." pesendm 1—.d lxaw"on bm*M sea bm cr a. and re aatuadn poled fL d m me NMhe.'as! Edna Marrq I- p,-de0 deapn dMnk M me conemw Iy aord W resnrandw n Edgy T,aac St" ws dr h. mroenly rm o' haw rsrorA M — revn.^eaoab b,rd tdrdah y wheOded -�m,epojmt ct.& now W fro CAY C—ol papa sI— n r-.,. Z. and S" Inc whodd nth de laadwac Edna adopted y ey CAy ally xnpdvedxeds sally .Mrroxeny'1, o 1'>E Nafyasl E era Ip I%sumrw d eba: hw. a no! nnry 9fpMlc :es , "0 Iemo neeerq , -a.,ed r,ra7a, raa Trend t b. Sb.dr Comp) -herb Mee bw edited here been added T,arspo,tyan Study 1008 all 200? I me of !ns meaaq. W p ea r.1h IM and speofill " m Ape 21 2006 a eormyel are rd Id abides hn9' peprrron d Pe L Fe C.-tV D. IT me Cw,hy Cla members aN dived 1. bM red.,V bor d tow Des9" fean mem:x : TM maew rJ ' —jraed nbwlla ban mT-0lanb hardy —bol" area based or ax• rev taw or rc Al Ina aPx,JSw, At des ooan ft- "Po wear, d Inv ,eLde'Ma pubic .1libes n nc ere avbzah b e•awb a public tyrxg A' Wr dr cdnvnem ard hpn and r-oe- n Ina bibFly d mbnny,Mabns rax*xrwmrav�s !and ors ^ 'g " Canny Club eea sea sMeN u^.provemrAS W Covery CIb area bar du 1l all %. hrnl oy LAY reyrMp bal,t re�etr.aerq sl of ,and,' dy Nadyetl n U+a NarMSI E one bond gnbd me properly orners a "c Ina ^eVnbvlm0 illy Mar lns reaTSMt>t, a wade' P'r' opal n Card aN Men W vol— and sprtm lM pubic MAaas ,n E Ina ,rewpobton 1-rspMeecr, $7.], poles a Cemlrae msrdras hsd ma , <u^.'Mnded dM b. or.' V pw w W ,,villa r&N dF fMl 0s9, pIMC aPa reparWK u' ridenaM abeeb Ina Canny sl,bAea Study The board MInbers pa,J l d A.apup.,W— Ippor" lo see f a <,eadeneM area safety all odnsaad:on TO TM nyerq Yo mm lee pmsbb Mad of n NalMSal Edra rf mr rse,rme porded i pA m +,PA. how bas•. M rd 4 q wetan mpruw,ents Ee ,.wawa. r aad M rG sabry vas nfnmal N; lamp apO# V nsdrfbal ant! hoev bbeal N 1MIe If mod." rr abou! —dvd t- Stall :—sro,es arpov % IxasenNeons —1 sel* woarne t TM 1•M red d resrtlererl ew sd* adellf -pawn s plav Ix ere .army and aw Be, Ella Task g,va,. r pM snr„ Nolaees: Eo ^y saws ell welt nw., Fps to make adl." Aar — fy b NvD,wt Ediry ID recrva eye xrpwrnrrbee srb er West adni'S rP."'dveed Caaery Ctlb env arei s steel rypvoA Ppes ,ecrsbuLttm nrposenynts W rra,eadmm, PcgadY omrr sna y, I,e �,� erpovenyrrb a•x,g Er rp r,e seeeb red s.I* ar,peoaertleres Id resden; rpu: ey sypeyest E dry 2001 all 20051 a IC I JWnt proposal a -T..dw wytlM CdY Coma approveO Trensoadeb. Sbdy be ey Canby CIb nrdsnyl .- ratan ft *-bely r©dd eras as Pert o'. pr,k mpabrremsl LOUntry' CWb red Vowy and wdw_d WAS re kticidn sdewaAt rd owners rM rd" re se,v pep"dor of plr,s p*d poPosad M bmdS d rem n"M. r me mN IT rld eDBObCYww and Ina Cny P T. ., eslmMetl fee part "dean z P,:e. 1y 4111 Cdr eytknp dads end bavnew o­� man - -,,,,d F'.d d' 'lsc - 1 .1 end resder% d all novad p:ar r -.xt 'n,s "rMI— ebb sopered I.Mnaat; Edna navy NP-A usms-' ens, m me Ed nr Sm ansn Ina opD -,Lary M tn,s end aah.w. rps no. x!: "." prupd scneaaes Ina x,e IM dd.c• d,n•am:,a , Slaty mPro_"' v. _.ow CmwltantLml apponrnMMy 5518.800 w mtEtlra T rrrapdMlwn hd1 _ as 1My are propoaec to te appw lo in Gantry Ckb nee Wi - WARNING _ JL _ A�_ SPEED HUMPS = - °'— d RAISED CROSSWALKS - - - _ k le _ _.._ AHEAD o J � 2005 2006 200r7 008 S - p To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: June 16, 2009 Subject: Receive petition REPORPRECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VII. B. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Info /Background: The City received a petition, circulated by Don and Judy Henderson of 5018 Normandale Court, requesting sidewalk along the West TH 100 Frontage Road from Benton Avenue to Valley View Road. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. June 9, 2009 RE: Petition to Edina City Council Petition for Sidewalk along West Frontage Road of Hwy #100 from Benton Avenue to Valley View Road. On June 2nd and June 3rd, 2009 we sat at the corner of 60th Street and the West Frontage road between 4:15 pm and 5:45 pm with a sign about the petition. We noticed that the traffice was very heavy on Tuesday. On Wednesday we counted 265 vehicles during this time (plus the ones missed during others signing the petition.) During this heavy traffic hour we observed and talked to a father who walks his 8 year old to and from school, a bicycler from Bloominton who commutes to work daily, a nanny from Richfield who uses the street for the kids she nannies, runners who said it was "dicey ", children riding bikes and roller blading, and people walking. Based on what we saw and the ones we talked to about the sidewalk, there is a definite safety factor here that needs to be addressed. In asking residents to sign the petition, we were told it was needed and long overdue. And most surprising to us, almost everyone thanked us for doing the petition and expressed their appreciation. We only had 2 refusals (one didn't like sidewalks at all ? ?, and one didn't sign any petitions.) Since we were getting such a positive responses, we are submitting the petition with the 92 signatures. If more support is needed, we can surely obtain more signatures. We wanted to move this petition forward and hopefully start the process of completing the sidewalk between Benton Ave. and Valley View Rd. Attached is the petition and signature es. Don and Judy Henderson 5018 Normandale Court Edina MN 55436 962- 920 -3948 City of Edina, Minnesota o� e lam CITY COUNCIL o /lay 4801 West 501h Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 ^.� t�• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL *SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING. ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE RECEIVED: r SE� 7 JIIAI 1220og RECEIVE ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SICINATURE . OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) � )A M 9 f LeolLf 541? . PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) Lo •�� �M7 cow r-OL This pet-Mga5vas circulated by: , 4 Aq J e i, r 11% NAME ere iss s'o I � AJo,emnepf.t Ct q5 of -9 9d -W t ADDRESS PHONE pace fo more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINT) me* -- PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) n" T-1MR RI: ' I"I I (� pa d, W 6o II L Jk This petition was circulated by: LIC (Do n 4. NAM ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) A 14M A 1JA, L.L y E-QWA - iz-D,0iJ �t16 oju&t.a, r*, re- '-:7oi�t I�O�I ��Y�CYCS� tIy' Oim (06a- S CPKi bp,- -164- 6 1 ,3ea-S a �- N PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 6tz —6 37?g 151-2w058 Si09 wisa:-'O st 1-'A. -' gy1 c6 Noc +v-,Yo C/ 1. 9s� -92-9-0 b q -1 A13- - '��5 -a�9 % H" 2;1 ( o7 15-7- - 92 C -7 99 r 7 (o 2; _ Z� �Qk7 �Sz -12i -- f z 7 ( This petition was circulated by: V 39�� AME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no = consequence for refiisin& to supply this information -a. '� You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 �gtN��ly City of Edina, Minnesota o` @ CITY COUNCIL Nr\ !y 4801 West 50`h Street o Edina, Minnesota 55424 °• <� �=' (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX o (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL *-qDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE RECEIVED: ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. C4TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS and between LOCATION OF IN PROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS --A LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE. OWNER'S NAME (PRU,1TED) n PROPERTY ADDRESS `P Dr%k- -ems There is space for more signatures on the back. LQ..F l PHONE: APRIL 2008 s� Petition for Frontage Road Sidewalk between Benton and Valley View Road. Property Owner's Cinnnfllre 0 a - ON IN I �A, �-� � Owner's Name (PRINTED) ern 11�) F> �- r n 7Du a pie I�Jr � U•n � � � i n Property Address (PRINTED) eve . 50i6 c 6000 Orr o(-�r �. 3T, S1 o P(4.c4L.1 5 v 3-3 o,,,Ot-CQy 5a�7SbS r'o r � 60 c- S30 ) ,N JXMW 0041-),- C7- &oa� af �4k dG1 CT 506y Petition for Frontage Road Sidewalk between Benton and Valley View Road. Property Owner's Sigpature e Owner's Name (PRINTED) Property Address (PRINTED) m 4e:t R,, LL,,j �5 o a o C( We-c iii d VGY� Ca 7-Z Ia)C./t1�CJ_�c9 7eb6JL A'A E:\ c �i zoe i+ s3`53(r ��G 5 , S 3C7 1' �i r� cr � bpi vex Petition for Frontage Road Sidewalk between Benton and Valley View Road. Property Owner's Signature .t Owner's Name (PRINTED) YL Property Address (PRINTED) 1 r. o e 0 lees To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: June 16, 2009 Subject: Correspondence Received Since Last Council Meeting Info /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VII.C. Consent ❑ Information Only VIIJ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Grp - 0G o Gc� . CRONAN PEARSON 0 0 0 QUINLIVAN P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW RECEIVED JUN 12 2009 June 10, 2009 Mr. Michael Siitari Chief of Police City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Cronan Burglary on March 10, 2009 Dear Chief Siitari: Patrick C. Cronan ext. 107 patrick.cronan@cpglaw.com My home was burglarized on March 10, 2009. Having never been a victim of any type of crime I was angry and upset. The officers who responded to our call were professional, courteous, and thorough even though they had a long day as we had a snow storm that day with several motor vehicle accidents. Detective Carlson was able to help track down the individual who broke in to our house, or fenced our stolen personal property, and he is entering a guilty plea in Anoka County District Court. Detective Carlson was able to recover.my old college ring and one of the my children's computer games. I really appreciate the efficient and excellent police work your officers displayed. Having lived in Edina for over 5'0 years I feel lucky we have such great police officers. Many thanks to all of your officers and staff. Very truly yours, t;Patrick . `� Cronan 1201 Marquette Avenue, Suite 110 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 Telephone 612.332.1300 Facsimile 612.332.3229 RECEIVED .ION 12 2�9 0 FFI Gam- MOORS, MAN 4 TH'A'NES F'DYZ WI.ffN(� WAG- 5TAPS �" Hqlp I -r}{E�7 'fii'EiF. I4-ON65�'�� WE WDU.l.�7 (� �oP�nlorl QN 1 (1�5. '(kFA�Ks A&M 0 FDA qffUf' T�oN `f A-tION(2 U� �,avg, � Wow - �'r/ IN6po l�t� 091 - Q u k"? Z0 MARKETING AND SPECIAL � ,t�n' r cS�� 7 ' S BARLOW PLAZA ; a4 d�lff STREET 1 171 6TH t ROCHESTER, MN 55901 t4' (507) 358-25 INGRID@MESTADS-COM ID 0 FFI Gam- MOORS, MAN 4 TH'A'NES F'DYZ WI.ffN(� WAG- 5TAPS �" Hqlp I -r}{E�7 'fii'EiF. I4-ON65�'�� WE WDU.l.�7 (� �oP�nlorl QN 1 (1�5. '(kFA�Ks A&M 0 FDA qffUf' T�oN `f A-tION(2 U� �,avg, � Wow - �'r/ IN6po l�t� 091 - Q u k"? Z0 June 7, 2009 MayorJim Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 West 50h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, RECEIVED JUN 0 91009 Today I had the pleasure of attending the Edina Art Fair. It was enjoyable to not have the rain to contend with, which would have been the case had I attended yesterday. But there was rain on my "parade" after all; when I returned to my car I found a parking ticket. I had parked some 10 or 15 feet from the corner on a residential street (49th and Arden). The citation (copy enclosed) stated that a parked car must be 30 feet from the stop sign. How am I supposed to know this? In my city (Excelsior) we can park up close to the stop signs. Other cities I have visited have small signs on the stop sign post that says "No Parking Within 30 Feet." There was no practical way for me to know this ordinance. I went to your website looking for ordinance 169- 34- 1 -A -7. Guess what ?; I can't find any ordinance anywhere on your website with that ordinance number. I looked all over the site and finally found language that uses the distance "30 feet': 1405.01 Clear View Zone Defined. The triangular area formed by connecting the following three points: the point of intersection of the curb lines extended of intersecting streets, and a point on each curb line 30 feet from the aforementioned point of intersection I also found this language that uses the distance "5 feet'; 1400.10 Parking, Stopping and Standing; Loading. Subd. 1 Additional Parking Rules. No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: B. Within five feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway. How is a law abiding citizen from a neighboring community supposed to know this rule? Your website seems to contradict itself— is it 5 feet or 30 feet? Does a visitor have to read your regulations from top to bottom before coming to your city? I hope you enjoy the $24 that I will send in. But this is the last time I will go shopping in downtown Edina. I saw other tickets on cars that were parked illegally like mine. The Edina Art Fair draws thousands of people from all over the Twin Cities. And this is how Edina welcomes them? Wow. Sincerely, Tom Skramstad 28020 Woodside Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Community Code: 050 409438878 Drivers License Number State X924226804215 MN Name - Last, First Middle BLU SKRAMSTAD, THOMAS BRYAN 175 Address - Street, Apt # I N 28020 WOODSIDE RD State city State zip EXCELSIOR MN Ce4411 - DOB (mm/dd/yyyy) Eyes Height Weight Gender Race 07/3 /1945 BLU 5'11 175 M I N Vehicle License No. State Plate Year Make Model Color XIRT MN 2009 1 JEEP 4 -DR SIL Date of Offense Time of Offense Accident 06/07/2009 02:07 PM ❑ Irgury ❑ Property ❑ Fatal Parking Meter No. Neighborhood Code ❑ HousinglBulding Court U Booked ® Owner ❑ Passenger ❑ Driver Offense Location ARDEN AVE N OF COUNTRY CLUB RD No 1 Offense Statute/Ord. Jurisd. Code TRAF - PARKING- WITHIN 30 FT 169- 34 -1 -A -7 OF STOP SIGN No 2 Offense Statute/Ord. Jurisd. Code No 3 Offense Statute/Ord. Jurisd. Code ❑ NO PROOF OF INSURANCE 169.791 (sub ) ❑ SPEED MS169.14 (sub ) : ❑ NO SEAT BELT mph in a zone Use MS 169.686 ] Endangering Life/Property ❑ Unsafe Conditions ❑ Commercial Vehicle ] Hazardous Material (DOT) ❑ Construction Zone dentification: ❑ DL ❑ Photo ID ❑ Other :omments: tfficer ID No(s). CCNff/ICR# Citing /agency 117 EDINA PD If fine is not paid within 21 days a $5.00 late fee will be added. Limited Fine Schedule Parking Parking Violations (MN Stat. 169.34 8, Similar Parking Ordinances).......... $24.00 Parking Violations (Meter, Snow Emergency, Street Cleaning) 34.00 Handicap Parking - License Required 204.00 Speeding Speeding .. ..... ... _. $145.00 Speeding 20 or More Miles over Limit 212.00 Speeding in a Work/School zone.. ., . . .. 212.00 Other Moving Violations Careless Driving without an Accident . . $178.00 Fail to Obey a Stop Sign or Semaphore 145.00 Improper or Prohibited Turn. -, 128.00 Failure to Yield Right of Way.. 128.00 Improper Lane Use. 128.00 Drivers License V101ations No Valid License ............... $178.00 No License in Possession (May display at Violations Bureau) 98.00 Driving after Suspension /Revocation/Cancellation. 178.00 License Plate /Equipment Violations Expired License Plates/Tabs $108.00 No Seatbeft. 103.00 Criminal Violations .Possession of Small Amount of Marijuana ...... ....... .$128.00 NO INSURANCE VIOLATIONS: If you have received a citation for No Proof of Insurance and the vehicle you were driving was covered at the date and time of offense, submit a copy of your insurance card within 10 business days to the Violations Bureau either in person or by mail. OFFENSES THAT CAN BE RESOLVED BY PAYING A FINE You may elect to plead "Guilty as Charged% to all listed charges and pay the fine(s). Payment of a fine(s) is deemed to be a'Plea of Guilty'. Fines) may be paid in any one of the following ways: TO PAY BY PHONE: Using Mastercard or Visa call 612 - 348 -2040. TO PAY ON LINE: By electronic check or credit card access the above web site. TO PAY BY MAIL: Make check payable to: District Court Administration. Mail To: District Court - Hennepin County, Government Center, Public Service Level 300 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55487.0014 TO PAY IN PERSON: Payments are accepted at the four Courts, call for addresses. By PAYING THIS FINE(S) YOU ARE ENTERING A PLEA OF GUILTY to, this offense(s) and volunlari waive your rights tot the following: To a trial to the court, if offense is a petty misdemeanor, or to a trial to the court or Jury, if the offense k a misdemeanor. To be represented by counsel. To be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt: To confront and cross examine all prosecution witnesses. To either remain silent or to testify in my own behalf. YOU MUST CONTACT THE VIOLATIONS BUREAU AT 612- 348 -2040 IF: 1. You wish to plead not guilty, or. 2. You wish to plead gully and offer an explanation. WARNING: 1) Failure to respond to this citation within twenty one (21) days will result in increased penalties and Fees assessed. Your drivers license may be suspended, the amount due may be referred to a collection agency who has collection authority and may access non - public government data for the purpose of expediting collection or a warrant may be issued for your arrest. 2) Failure to appear for a Petty Misdemeanor will be considered a Plea of Guilty and waiver of your right to a trial unless the failure to appear is due to Circumstances beyond the persons control. If you fail to appear or to comply with the orders of the court relating to a Motor Vehicle Citation, your drivers license will be suspended by the Commissioner of Public Safety. RECEIVED Tim Jordheim JUN 0 9 1009 5704 Tucker Lane Edina, MN 55436 T 952 922 -3105 tim. jordheim @comeast. net June 7, 2009 Ms. Ann Swenson Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Member Swenson: I am writing to register my opposition to the Nine Mile Creek Regional M-A as proposed and to request that, when the Edina City Council is called to decide, you vote against it. I've been an Edina homeowner for 25 years. My wife and I love this town, raised our daughter in it and have enjoyed its many amenities. Not least of those amenities is the physical environment of residential Edina: a rich combination of parks, public green space and thousands of private properties. Clearly, this is a community that highly values its environment and invests in and cares for it - whether public or private - and we've been strong supporters of that investment. The proposed Nine Mile Creek trail, unfortunately, would be an investment that would cause significant degradation of a unique and lovely part of Edina's physical environment and I cannot support that. For the past five years we've lived in the LondonderryTownhomes development adjacent to Nine Mile Creek in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Londonderry and Lincoln Drive. The creek's environs along here are dense urban hardwood forest including many majestic old cottonwood trees. In addition to providing year -round beauty both to us as residents as well as to the walkers, cyclists and drivers on Lincoln Drive, it provides essential habitat and a safe corridor for the daily use by wildlife such as deer, fox, raccoon, turkeys, mink and a variety of birds including herons, hawks, duck and egrets. Living here awakened us to what a tremendous resource Nine Mile Creek is, not just for us, but for so many different areas of Edina. While our particular situation is only one of many across Edina that make the proposed trail an environmental concern for the city, I think its a good example. I've studied carefully the trail routing on the Segment 1 map and walked the creek banks. It's clear that installing a 16 -foot regional trail (including right -of -way) will destroy a significant portion of the urban forest (including those irreplaceable cottonwoods) and the wildlife habitat and corridor. For those of us in Londonderry who live creek side, it will also significantly reduce the visual and sonic privacy the creek's environs have provided for 30+ years. I believe it will be easiest for you to understand our, and other residents', concerns if you see the situation first -hand. Please contact me by phone or email and I would be more than happy to personally escort and show you the source of our concerns. I believe it will then be clear why the proposed trail would detract from, not improve, Edina's physical environment and why it should be stopped. Sincerely yours, Tim Jordheim John Keprios From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:05 AM To: John Keprios Subject: FW: Chowen Park proposal From: Dave K. [mailto:airkings @usfamily.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:43 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Chowen Park proposal 5/27/09 RECEIVED JUN U 5 2009 Joni Bennett Edina City Council Member Daniel Peterson Edina Park Board Representative Re: Chowen Park vegetable garden proposal liap://www.startiibune.comipol tics/] ocal/45 805 8l2.htm1?eli---KArksUUUU Ms. Bennett and Mr. Peterson, We and our young children are near -daily users of Chowen Park, and we object to YEA Corps converting a section of public park for what is ostensibly private use. As you are aware, Chowen Park is one of the smaller parks in Edina. The available green space is very limited, and what is there is fairly heavily used. The park as a whole is generally busy, accommodating many children from homes immediately adjacent to the park, and from blocks away, as is the case with our family. Even if it were a good idea to convert part of the park for a vegetable garden, there is no extra land in the park with which to do so. The Star Tribune story indicated some type of informal neighbor survey took place, but no one has approached us. Based on the feedback to the Star Tribune story, it's apparent our concerns are shared by'others. The parties mentioned in the story live very close to the park, and allowing them to develop a vegetable garden in the park would be akin to allowing them an extension of their private lots onto public land for personal use. If they're interested in starting a vegetable garden for kids to use and maintain, there's nothing stopping them from making one on their own property. Chowen Park is enjoyed by many people from the surrounding area for the amenities it offers. It isn't appropriate to convert public greenspace to accommodate what is essentially private use. Your consideration is appreciated. Sincerely, Dave and Cindy Kingrey 6016 Chowen Ave. S. Edina, MN 55410 952- 926 -3619 - -- Get FREF .High Speed Internet Irom.1.)SFamily.Net!. - -- 5/28/2009 RECEIVED To: City Council Members, Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle, JUN U 6 2009 I dropped a petition by City Hall today and want to follow up on it with you to give you some history as to why you are getting it now. Attached is the summary that is part of the petition. I discussed changes to the intersection of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road with Ann Swenson, Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle a couple of months ago. At that time I was discussing a petition to have the intersection realigned in a manner consistent with the original traffic safety plan's proposal. Wayne advised me to start with discussing this with some City Council members to see if you would even consider a petition if one was submitted. I spoke with Ann Swenson first and she advised me that if I could get all of the signatures of residents surrounding the intersection that she would be willing to consider it. I then spoke with Mayor Hovland who advised me that if I could get a particular neighbor on Arden to support it then he would consider it. That was my stumbling point. When I initially spoke to this neighbor she told me she would not support the changes recommended by the traffic safety plan. She did, however, state that she would support a "T "ing off of the intersection as that was apparently part of what was discussed in the compromise plan that eventually was passed by the city. Those changes were, however, dropped before what you have now as the compromise plan was proposed to the city. After my first conversation with this neighbor she changed her mind as to her support of "T "ing the intersection even though she admitted the intersection is a safety problem but was concerned that any change might shunt more traffic onto Arden. I decided at that point not to continue to pursue a petition. The black top was removed from Drexel almost 2 weeks ago and unfortunately this has not slowed how fast and carelessly people turn the corner to go north onto Drexel. There is even a large temporary "speed bump" in the middle of the road which is not a barrier. Once we, the Drexel neighbors, saw this and realized that the cross walk is going to be placed in front of the island so pedestrians will be in the cross walk and cars will not even see them until they start to come into the island corner we became even more concerned for the safety of the corner. This is what prompted the current petition asking for a "T "ing off of the intersection. We were easily able to get almost all of the residents on the 4600 block of Drexel Avenue and on Country Club Road who surround this intersection to sign. The only residents on the 4600 block who did not sign were not at home when the petition was circulated. If you would like us to get everyone we will. No one declined signing the petition and the only people who were hesitant to sign were those who felt like we should be asking for more than just "T "ing it off. I would love to ask for more, however I wanted to go into this knowing that what we are asking for would be well received and not too controversial. I want to be clear that we are not asking for just the island to be removed. The entrance to Drexel needs to be narrowed to at least what Casco is now in order to effectively force car traffic to take a deliberate left turn. Again, our motivation for this is the safety of both pedestrian and automobile traffic. Our purpose is not to keep traffic off the road but instead to try to make the intersection safer. Thank you for considering the petition. Shannon Neale 4623 Drexel Avenue 952 - 926 -2216 Petition for the Realignment of the Intersection of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road The residents surrounding the corner of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road petition for a change in the alignment of the intersection of Country Club Road and Drexel Avenue. We are asking for the intersection to be "T "ed off in a manner similar to the alignment of the intersection of Casco Avenue and Country Club Road. History: The original safety improvement proposal, from the traffic study of NE Edina reported in 2007, recommended a realignment of the intersection at Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road. The proposal would have resulted in a widening of the island at that intersection. The city council repealed its approval of the Traffic Safety Plan in April 2008 after residents on surrounding streets objected to any changes that they felt could potentially increase traffic flow on other streets. Current Situation: We understand that this petition is coming very late in the process of reconstruction of our roads; however we are moved to petition now given our concern for the safety of cars and pedestrians at the intersection. The road being torn up and partially closed has not changed traffic habits at the intersection. People still turn left going north on Drexel at a high speed seemingly unaffected by the obvious poor condition of the road. We are hopeful that "T "ing off the intersection will force traffic to make a more deliberate and thus safer left turn onto Drexel rather than the "sling shot" left turn they now make. Since this change does not involve a horizontal measure we don't feel this will shift traffic onto any neighboring streets. Thank you for your consideration. Edina City Offices. 4501 W. 50th St. Edina MN 55424 e -mail: edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE FOLLOWING: Edina Park & Recreation Department, John Keprios and Park Board members Three Rivers Park District, Kelly Grissman Senior Manager of Planning with Three Rivers Park District, Jonathan Vlaming City Coijncil: Mayor James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek because: Habitat, environment — From Valley Lane to Creek View Lane, the woods and wetlands are home to many species of birds, frogs turtles and more. Blazing. a 16 -foot -wide trail would destroy habitats and add to pollution. Flooding — The creek often overflows into yards. A trail would damage or ruir< wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. Safety — If a path is built, we question the safety for adjacent homes and schools. Estimated number of trail users is 500,000 per year, which would bring many visitors close to our schools, and thus add safety concerns for parents. Budget and priorities — This isn't the appropriate time for such a big- ticket project The state budget deficit stands at more than. $4.27 billion, much of that affecting schools. As budget cuts loom for Valley View Middle School and Edina High, a bike trail isn't a necessity. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. Sincerely, Name Q Address �%/ � Z47�( au�/_51 Date Edina City Offices 4501 W. 50th St. Edina MN 55424 e -mail: edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE FOLLOWING: Edina Park & Recreation Department, John Keprios and Park Board members Three Rivers Park District, Kelly Grissman Senior Manager of Planning with Three Rivers Park District, -Jonathan-Vlaming City Coijncil: Mayor James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson I oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek because: Habitat, environment — From Valley Lane to Creek View Lane, the woods and wetlands are home to many species of birds, frogs turtles and more. Blazing. a 16 -foot -wide trail would destroy habitats and add to pollution. Flooding — The creek often overflows into yards. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. Safety — If a path is built, we question the safety'for adjacent homes and schools. Estimated number of trail users is 500,000 per year, which would bring many visitors close to our schools, and thus add safety concerns for parents. Budget and priorities — This isn't the appropriate time for such a big - ticket project. The state budget deficit stands at more than $4.27 billion, much of that affecting schools. As budget cuts loom for Valley View lkliddle School and Edina High, a bike trail isn't a necessity. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. Sincerely, Address �2JOc) A &, RECEIVED CALVIN L. SMITH juN 091 5221 LOCHLOY DRIVE I i r � i r r JAMES VAN VALKENBURG 4204 Philbrook Lane Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 922 -2982 May 27, 2009 Hon. James B. Hovland 4801 W. 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Jim, Recently I did a nose dive in my bedroom and ended up with 911, the police, the medics. I ended up in the emergency section of Fairview where I got good service. The paramedics were Pat Fandon and Bill O'Brien. The police were Joy Gragodt and Brian Hubbard. The speed with which they reacted, their thoroughness, the. professional way in which they worked and their treatment were excellent. You have good people working for the citizens of Edina. Be that you do not need them personally— but they are there ready to help. I wanted you and the rest.of the council to know of their good work. Sincerely, James Van Valkenburg cc: Gordon Hughes Mike Sittari Marty Scheerer RECEIVE CALVIN L. SMITH 5221 LOCHLOY DRIVE JUN 09 M EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 7� o o/`,� i ' / r r r r , qa�,,A Oz Date Edina City Offices 4801 W. 50th St. Edina M,N 55424 e -mail: edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE FOLLOWING: Edina Park & Recreation Department, John Keprios and Park Board members Three Rivers Park District, Kelly Grissman Senior Manager of Planning with Three Rivers Park District, Jonathan Vlaming City Council: Mayor James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson . oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek because: Habitat, environment — From Valley Lane to Creek View Lane, the woods and wetlands are home to many species of birds, frogs turtles and more. Blazing. a 16 -foot -wide trail would destroy habitats and add to pollution. Flooding — The creek often overflows into yards. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. Safety —*If a path is built, we question the safety for adjacent homes and schools. Estimated number of trail users is 500,000 per year, which would bring many visitors close to our schools, and thus add safety concerns for parents. Budget and priorities — This isn't the appropriate time for such a big - ticket project The state budget deficit stands at more than $4.27 billion, much of that affecting schools. As budget cuts loom for Valley View Middle School and Edina High, a bike trail isn't a necessity. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. Since Name Addre rely, ss z mc� VAv In rV 1 MvT�'0.�,IlH.'.b1ti� THE PILGRIM CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION %. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. C. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: June 16, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. RECEIVED Subject: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 JUN 161009 Dear City Council Members: It is my understanding that you will be considering a petition tomorrow evening from the residents of Drexel Avenue. It is my understanding that the proposal is to remove the island and create a T intersection similar to Casco and Bruce. Having spoken to many of my neighbors on Arden, the universal reaction is that there is concern that the proposed change on Drexel will divert traffic off of Drexel and onto Arden Avenue. As you may be aware, traffic entering the neighborhood at 50th and Wooddale is now directed to "Keep Right ". The addition of the traffic island and the Keep Right sign at this entrance to the neighborhood in 1995 directed traffic off of Wooddale, and onto the streets to the east. The fact that it was a goal of the traffic plan to shift traffic onto other streets was never shared with neighborhood residents until after the plan was implemented. Up until that time, all of the measures had been described as traffic calming measures. In any case, the reality today is that upon entering the neigborhood at Wooddale and 50th, drivers are told to keep right. The first left drivers can take to cut through the neighborhood is Drexel, and the last left they can take is Arden. Unfortunately, after the changes in 1995, both Drexel and Arden saw major increases in traffic. To this day, we believe the traffic on both of these streets is disproportionately high due to these changes. Arden's traffic volumes are extremely high, higher than those on Drexel, and we do not want to see any more increase in traffic. We believe we've borne the brunt of one failed plan, and do not believe we should have to take one more car on our street in the name of "safety" for another street. We have over 70 children on the 4600 block alone. Our children have great difficulty crossing the street because it is so busy, particularly during the morning commuting hours, as well as between 4 and 6 p.m. The parking of construction vehicles, visitors cars, etc, on such a narrow street makes it nearly impossible to see whether there is oncoming traffic. We believe Arden has the greatest volume of traffic, by a large percentage, of any of the eastbound streets, and we do not want to s ee that volume increase. I also wanted to address two points made by Ms. Neal on Drexel that accompanied the petition that was submitted to you. The first is with regard to the crosswalk that will be installed at Drexel and Country Club Road. Ms. Neal indicates that what prompted their petition was the fact that they learned that the crosswalk at this intersection would be placed after the island, so cars would be entering the intersection and then encounter a pedestrian. I have looked at the drawings from the web site, dated 10- 12 -07, and while there is a confusing drawing (Drawing No. 2) that seems to show both a crosswalk through the island as well as a crosswalk after the island, Drawing No. 4 shows very clearly that the crosswalk is going through the intersection. All of the crosswalks at the north end of the neighborhood have been installed through the islands, if an island exists. I would encourage the Council to get clarification from staff on this matter. In addition, I never indicated that I was in support of changing the intersection at Drexel, and then "changed my mind ". I just want to make that clear to the Council. I think I've been pretty consistent all along in my dealings with my neighbors, as well as with the Council, in stating that I will not support any changes that shift traffic. Ms. Neal asked that I work with her to remove the island at Wooddale, and I told her that, while I think the island was a very unfair change to the neighborhood, there are many people who bought on Wooddale after 1995 who did not know the island was added. They thought it had always been there. They relied on its existence in making their decision to live on Wooddale. To try to undo that now seems like the same sort of unneighborly act that was done to those of us on Arden and Drexel back in 1995. As always, thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Anne Scoggin Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill. RECEIVED JUN 161009 From Ann and Charles Singer @4519 Arden Ave. We are in agreement with Ms. Scoggin's statements in her letter below. Please seriously consider her remarks. The traffic on Arden is very dangerous and we do not need to have it increase. Subject: Important! Council meeting tonight - changes affect ARDEN! Dear City Council Members: It is my understanding that you will be considering a petition tomorrow evening from the residents of Drexel Avenue. It is my understanding that the proposal is to remove the island and create a T intersection similar to Casco and Bruce. Having spoken to many of my neighbors on Arden, the universal reaction is that there is concern that the proposed change on Drexel will divert traffic off of Drexel and onto Arden Avenue. As you may be aware, traffic entering the neighborhood at 50th and Wooddale is now directed to "Keep Right". The addition of the traffic island and the Keep Right sign at this entrance to the neighborhood in 1995 directed traffic off of Wooddale, and onto the streets to the east. The fact that it was a goal of the traffic plan to shift traffic onto other streets was never shared With neighborhood residents until after the plan was implemented. Up until that time, all of the measures had been described as traffic calming measures. In any case, the reality today is that upon entering the neigborhood at Wooddale and 50th, drivers are told to keep right. The first left drivers can take to cut through the neighborhood is Drexel, and the last left they can take is Arden. Unfortunately, after the changes in 1995, both Drexel and Arden saw major increases in traffic. To this day, we believe the traffic on both of these streets is disproportionately high due to these changes. Arden's traffic volumes are extremely high, higher than those on Drexel, and we do not want to see any more increase in traffic. We believe we've borne the brunt of one failed plan, and do not believe we should have to take one more car on our street in the name of "safety" for another street. We have over 70 children on the 4600 block alone. Our children have great difficulty crossing the street because it is so busy, particularly during the morning commuting hours, as well as between 4 and 6 p.m. The parking of construction vehicles, visitors cars, etc, on such a narrow street makes it nearly impossible to see whether there is oncoming traffic. We believe Arden has the greatest volume of traffic, by a large percentage, of any of the eastbound streets, and we do not w! ant to s ee that volume increase. I also wanted to address two points made by Ms. Neal on Drexel that accompanied the petition that was submitted to you. The first is with regard to the crosswalk that will be installed at Drexel and Country Club Road. Ms. Neal indicates that what prompted their petition was the fact that they learned that the crosswalk at this intersection would be placed after the island, so cars would be entering the intersection and then encounter a pedestrian. I have looked at the drawings from the web site, dated 10- 12 -07, and while there is a confusing drawing (Drawing No. 2) that seems to show both a crosswalk through the island as well as a crosswalk after the island, Drawing No. 4 shows very clearly that the crosswalk is going through the intersection. All of the crosswalks at the north end of the neighborhood have been installed through the islands, if an island exists. I would encourage the Council to get clarification from staff on this matter.. In addition, I never indicated that I was in support of changing the intersection at Drexel, and then "changed my mind ". I just want to make that clear to the Council. I think I've been pretty consistent all along in my dealings with my neighbors, as well as with the Council, in stating that I will not support any changes that shift traffic. Ms. Neal asked that I work with her to remove the island at Wooddale, and I told her that, while I think the island was a very unfair change to the neighborhood, there are many people who bought on Wooddale after 1995 who did not know the island was added. They thought it had always been there. They relied on its existence in making their decision to live on Wooddale. To try to undo that now seems like the same sort of unneighborly act that was done to those of us on Arden and Drexel back in 1995. As always, thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Anne Scoggin RECEIVED JUN 16 2009 From: jen klise [mailto:jen.kiise @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 7:25 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: dack Subject: Fwd: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 Hello, My husband and I could not agree with Anne Scoggin more. During the past couple of weeks when construction cut off Drexel and Wooddale, we saw what will happen if there is a permanent adjustment to a street in this neighborhood. We need solutions that help all of the neighborhood, not simply move a problem to another street. Given technology advances, there must be a way to post no through traffic and then for the police to monitor the cars that use our streets for this purpose. In my opinion the added pavement upgrades at the crosswalks has done and will do nothing to curb speed and traffic. Please do not address only one issue at a time. Thank you, Jen Klise 4614 Arden Ave Edina MN 55424 Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED JUN 16 2009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:44 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Drexel petition From: Mike Fernandez [ mailto :mfernandez @integrityliving.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:42 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Drexel petition Dear City Council: I just learned from a neighbor that the city is reviewing a petition for change from a neighbor on the corner of Drexel and Country Club. I hope the Council will deny this proposal, nor any other proposals, to make changes to the plan decided last year. In particular, changing Drexel intersection at Bridge to a "T', will likely re- direct traffic down to Arden. Arden has the most traffic per day and we don't want one more car directed to our street. Thank you for your consideration to this matter. Mike Fernandez 4630 Arden Ave. 6/16/2009 Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED . JUN 161009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:12 PM Cc: - Susan Howl Subject: FW: Drexel petition From: Mike Fernandez [mailto:mfernandez @integrityliving.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:00 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: RE: Drexel petition I meant Country Club not Bridge or any changes that may direct traffic to Arden... Thanks From: Mike Fernandez [mailto:mfernandez @integrityliving.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:42 PM To: 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: Drexel petition Dear City Council: I just learned from a neighbor that the city is reviewing a petition for change from a neighbor on the corner of Drexel and Country Club. I hope the Council will deny this proposal, nor any other proposals, to make changes to the plan decided last year. In particular, changing Drexel intersection at Bridge to a "T', will likely re- direct traffic down to Arden. Arden has the most traffic per day and we don't want one more car directed to our street. Thank you for your consideration to this matter. Mike Fernandez 4630 Arden Ave. 6/16/2009 RECEIVED JUN 151009 Subject: Safety on Drexel Avenue Dear Jim Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh and Ann Swenson, My name is Christina Delianedis and live at 4624 Drexel Avenue. I am a mother of 2 children. I am sending you this e -mail because of a petition my neighbors and I have signed in hopes that you will consider our concerns for safety on our street. I am a stay at home mom and spend a great deal of time outside walking our dogs, going to the bus stop and generally talking with neighbors while our children play outside. As many of you know, our kids tend to play in the front yards running back and forth. It is the best way for us as a community to connect and communicate in this busy time of life. It also allows us to be experts on the speed in which cars travel on Drexel. There have been numerous times one of us has had to literally jump in front of an on coming car because of the speed in which it is traveling. There are times cars will attempt to pass around our kids school bus while it has stopped to pick up the children. I have had 2 different babysitters get their cars totaled parked in front of our house. Both cars were hit from cars coming from Country Club onto Drexel. It is very confusing when you are taking a left on to Drexel from Country Club and forced to pass in front of oncoming traffic to get in the right lane. A OIt also causes cars to speed up when they are traveling on Country Club going west, then taking a right on to Drexel. If there are 2 cars coming off of Country Club on to Drexel one traveling West and the other turning East on to Drexel (going North) is cause for even more confusion. It forces cars to speed up and get in to their lane on Drexel. In addition to that is the dilemma of cars traveling North on Drexel on to Country Club. Again and again if the car wants to go left on Country Club often they take the left of the island in to an oncoming car taking a right off of Country Club and in the path of the oncoming car. Is it confusing for any of you at this point? I can assure you it is for people traveling on our road. I have been a witness to it over and over again. Trust me, it is impossible for a teenage driver to figure that one out and consistently they are traveling at a very fast speed. I can assure you if you asked our bus drivers they would back up many of our concerns. I am sure the workers on our street today would agree there is little regard for pedestrians and rules of the road. We had our annual end of the year block party on the last day of school. I had the appropriate cones designated for the road block. We ended up calling city hall explaining that people disregarded the cones as well as the construction signs stating, Road Closed and Block Party (a few even drove over the cones). The city had to deliver the large road block stands that cross over the street so cars could not come down our street. My hope is you will consider this to be enough evidence that something needs to be done. I do not believe this problem will go away until there is some measure to slow traffic. Having a "T "ed off entrance seems to be a logical and easy solution to this. It is consistent with most of the neighborhood streets next to ours (Casco, Bruce, Arden etc..). I believe cars having to stop or slow down to take a left or right on to Drexel from Country Club would help slow the speed in which they are traveling on Drexel. I challenge all of you to come sit at that corner and observe for a morning or afternoon. Finally, I appeal to you as mothers and fathers. We, on this end of our block, are the ones that observe these fast cars. I fear that some day we will be back at this because someone was hit. We are pleading for this "T "ed off entrance because we feel it will make our street safer. We all know cars are traveling faster these day. We want our street to be safe. Thank You, Christina Delianedis Page 1 of 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:37 AM RECEIVED Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Country Club traffic JUN 16 Z0� From: jb.tuttle @att.net [mailto:jb.tuttle @att.net] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 8:34 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Country Club traffic Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am frustrated that once again one street is trying to "lighten their traffic load" and add to streets that already bear a great traffic load. Arden is BUSY, and anything that will add more traffic is unacceptable. This was all thought out, fought over and comprised on last year. The over 70 children in the 4600 block of Arden deserve a street that they can safely cross. Adding more traffic will make this an even greater safety issue. Please do the right thing for the children of Country Club! Jayne and Todd Tuttle 4609 Arden Avenue 6/16/2009 RECEIVED JUN 16 2009 Subject: Council Meeting on Tuesday -- Drexel Avenue petition Dear City Council - -- I learned from a neighbor that the City Council is evaluating a petition for change on the corner of Drexel Avenue and Country Club. I hope that you will not be accepting this proposal, nor any other, to make changes to the plan decided on last year. The traffic plan as arrived at for Country Club was a difficult matter, as you all know. Few were left completely satisfied. But -- to your credit -- the compromises were made in as open a forum as possible, with representation from all streets involved for dialogue, if they chose to be. Re- opening prior decisions for one street would be an unhappy policy decision. If for one, why not for others? What would be the process this time for involving all in the neighborhood and keeping all informed? In particular, changing the Drexel intersection at Bridge to a "T ", will likely re- direct traffic down to Arden Avenue. We who live on Arden are already acutely aware that our street has borne a larger traffic increase than any other in Country Club since the 1995 change. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Regards, Ben Knoll 4601 Arden Ave RECEIVED JUN 16 2009 Subject: Fwd: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 Importance: High I am writing to say that I strongly agree with the sentiments expressed by Anne Scoggin. I've lived in the neighborhood, and on Arden, for nearly 9 years now. And because I have three children, I spend a good amount of time on other streets in the neighborhood. My experience is therefore more than anecdotal, and I can tell you that Arden already receives more than its fair share of traffic through the area. While I can understand the impulse of those on Drexel to push some of their traffic to Arden, it's unfair, dangerous, and poor traffic engineering to allow that impulse to prevail. It may be too late to undo some of the burden that both streets bear as a result of the changes made in 1995. But it is not too late to fin-ther degrade circulation patterns in the neighborhood. A vote to reject the petition is therefore a vote to uphold basic safety, and a reasonable distribution of traffic through the area. Mark Schoening 4608 Arden Avenue Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED Susan Howl JUN 16 2009 From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:48 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Photos illustrating safety concerns at the intersection of Drexel and Country Club Attachments: Photo Illustrations Relevant to Drexel Avenue. Petition. doc From: Neale, Shannon M. (MD) [ mailto: Shannon.Neale @ParkNicollet.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:19 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Photos illustrating safety concerns at the intersection of Drexel and Country Club To City Council Members, I am bringing copies of photos illustrating the safety concerns at the intersection of Drexel and Country Club Road to City Hall tomorrow for all of you to view prior to or at the city council meeting. Attached is a summary of what the photos will illustrate. Thank you for considering this petition. Our primary motivation is the safety of all the cars and pedestrians who use this intersection. I don't know anyone who has experienced this intersection who doesn't agree it is unsafe. Please help us to fix this problem before there is a serious injury or fatality here. Thank you, Shannon Neale PRIVACY NOTICE: This e-mail message. including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain business confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If this e-mail was not intended for you, please notify the sender by reply e-mail that you received this in error. Destroy all copies of the original message and attachments. 6/16/2009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:47 AM RECEIVED Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Petition for Drexel Avenue From: The Gaskill Family [mailto:gaskillmn @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:37 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Petition for Drexel Avenue JUN 161009 Page 1 of 1 Dear City Counsel Members, As 14 year homeowners on Arden Avenue we are deeply concerned that you are considering yet another proposal that diverts additional traffic to our street. Given that Arden and Bruce Avenues are available alternatives straight from 50th street, we already have our fair share of cut through traffic. Our understanding was that the current construction would provide traffic calming measures for the entire neighborhood without making it worse for others. It is obvious that changing the intersection at Drexel will bring additional traffic to our street that is already unduly over - utilized and unfortunately under protected under the current plan. Thank you for your consideration, Anne and Bob Gaskill 4624 Arden Ave. 6/16/2009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:49 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: forward to city council members Please. July 16 petition for drexel ave road change RECEIVED - - - -- Original Message - - - -- JUN 16 200 From: Sharon Pugh [mailto:sharonpugh@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:10 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: forward to city council members Please. July 16 petition for drexel ave road change Edina City Council Members: I am writing to support the petition you will be voting on this evening which requests that the corner of Drexel -and Country Club road be changed from the current to a more traditional "T" corner. I support the petition for the following reasons: 1. traffic is at a high level in our neighborhood in general 2. we have many children living in our neighborhood and I hope we will far into the future. (I definitely want a family friendly neighborhood if we need to eventually sell our home.) 3. the people traveling through the neighborhood just need to be reminded that this is a place where there are children and they should proceed with the proper caution. I think this small change can help. 4. for those traveling on foot it would be a safer street crossing experience. Thank you for your continued efforts to keep Edina a great place for families to choose to live. Sharon Pugh 4525 Drexel Ave. RECEIVED JUN 16 2009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:43 AM Cc: Susan Howl Page 1 of 1 Subject: FW: Arden Avenue concerns with Drexel Petition for Council Meeting Tuesday, June, 16th, 2009 From: Kate Boyer [mailto:bkatel @msn.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 9:21 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Arden Avenue concerns with Drexel Petition for Council Meeting Tuesday, June, 16th, 2009 Dear City Council Members: We understand that tomorrow you will be considering a proposal from residents of Drexel Avenue to remove the island and create a T intersection. As residents of Arden Avenue we urge you to turn this proposal down. Obviously this change will move the traffic from Drexel and onto Arden Avenue. The residents of Arden Avenue also have children we want to keep safe from excessive traffic. Arden's traffic volume is already higher than the volume on Drexel. We have a fundamental problem with taking on even more traffic for the safety of another street. Our children deserve the same amount of safety as those on Drexel. Please do not suggest we test this to see what happens. We are living with the results of the 1995 "test"... increased traffic. Jack and-Kate Boyer 4605 Arden Avenue 6/16/2009 Page 1 of 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:46 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Drexel Petition From: Lizzierae @aol.com [mai Ito: Lizzierae@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 9:51 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Drexel Petition Dear City Council Members, We would be completely opposed to ANY change in our Country Club roads that would increase traffic on Arden Avenue. This street is very narrow and has an incredibly high traffic volume at the present time. Adding more traffic to our street would be unfair, unneighborly, and dangerous to the children who live on our street. Please do not make any changes that would redirect more traffic our way. Thank you for your consideration. Betsy and Kevin Pfeifer 4615 Arden Avenue An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! 6/16/2009 RECEIVED ,IUN 16 2009 Subject: FW: Traffic on 50th St. I still think the traffic on Arden and in Country Club is from the mess the city of Edina created at 501h and France some years ago. Eastbound 501h St. bottle necks to one lane and there is no right turn lane or left turn lane from 50th onto France. The traffic lights at 501h and France are short and if a car is turning right or left, only one or two cars get through. This causes rush hour traffic on 50t" to back up as far as Bruce. Rush hour and other traffic then detours through our neighborhood, especially onto Arden Av, the last through street. The city added a right turn lane on 50th at Lunds which helped a great deal, although they cut down an ancient elm to create the right turn lane. Big construction trucks also like to detour down our street. I would like to see 50th St. opened to four lanes again, to allow right and left turns. I bet our White Oaks neighbors would like to see traffic abatement as well. During certain times of day It is very difficult to turn left onto 501h and we are cut off from our neighbors in Arden Park. I would also like to see all street parking banned from France Av which would allow traffic to move through more easily down the main artery. This might upset the merchants but there are 3 parking ramps. Also the parked cars are a blight, create more traffic problems as people try to parallel park, and are not pedestrian friendly. Rather than pitting neighbor against neighbor, we should rethink the traffic snarl at 50th and France. And while I'm at it, is the light rail coming to Edina? Joyce Mellom Attorney at Law PO Box 24068 Minneapolis, MN 55424 Tel: (952) 920 -3002 Fax: (952) 915 -4413 www.MellomLawOffice.com imellom lawyer.com Page 1 of I Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:54 AM RECEIVED Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: More Traffic on Arden ? ? ? ? ? ?? SUN 16 2009 From: ktwj @aol.com [mailto:ktwj @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:52 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: More Traffic on Arden ? ? ? ? ? ?? I would like to say that if you permit any changes to Drexel at the Country Club and Drexel corner to divert traffic off their street then you need to do the same for Arden..... Arden has become a HUGE cut through for cars. I have never seen so much traffic!!!!! I wish that you would close the end of Arden at (Arden and Sunnyside) so no cars coming up Arden can make a right turn on to Sunnyside ..... As of now cars FLY THROUGH the intersection at great speeds without stopping. am totally against the Drexel petition unless you do the same for Arden.... PLEASE do not dump traffic on the smallest and narrowest street of our neighborhood.... Thank you! 4503 Arden Avenue I cannot attend the meeting tonight. Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill. 6/16/2009 RECEIVED JUN 161009 Subject: FW: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 Dear City Council Members: As a resident on the 4500 block of Arden Avenue and mother of 2 children, I voice my support for the concern articulated by Anne Scoggin. Arden Avenue experiences a large amount of commuter traffic while also being a narrow street in the neighborhood. One -off decisions should not be made without comprehensively looking at adjacent impacts. Thank you for the consideration, Zanna McFerson Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 Page 1 of 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:34 AM Cc: Susan Howl RECEIVED JUN 16 Zo Subject: FW: Petition for Drexel Avenue- Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 From: Tom_McFerson @cargill.com [ mailto :Tom_McFerson @cargill.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:29 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 City Council, We have lived on Arden since early'05 and have 2, 11 yr old children. We have no interest in having to handled any additional thru- traffic volume as a result of the proposed changes to the Drexel . In fact, it is well -known that of all the north /south running streets within the country club district, Arden handles the highest volume. The city council knows well what challenges this excessive amount of traffic presents to those that live on this street. A better use of the council's time would be to find ways to reduce the Arden traffic volume, not adding to it. Thank you for your consideration, Tom McFerson 4518 Arden Ave 6/16/2009 RECEIVED JUN 161009 Subject: Concern over the Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 Dear City Council Members: I am writing on behalf our household, which resides at 4631 Arden Avenue. Late yesterday evening my wife and I became aware of the petition that will be considered today regarding a reconfiguration of the intersection of Drexel and Country Club. We have read and agree with the general tenants of Ann Scoggin's e-mail on the adverse impact to Arden that is likely to result from changing the Drexel / Country Club Intersection. Specifically, Christine (my wife) and I are both concerned that the changes to this intersection will further increase traffic on Arden. As Ann so aptly points out we have over 70 children living in the 4600 block. We expect that in addition to the 4600 block the full section of Arden within Country Club would see a rise in traffic from 50th to Sunnyside. I want to highlight that yesterday evening I and another Arden neighbor sought to spread news of the petition by distributing copies of Ann's e-mail to Arden residences north of Bridge Street. It is my strong sense that most of my neighbors along Arden are still in the process of learning about and absorbing the potential implications of the petition. Please consider this potential impact of other neighborhood residents who are either not yet aware of or just newly aware of this petition and the impact of traffic on our busy street. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Randal and Christine Harrison (4631 Arden Ave.) Home E -mail: Harrisonfamily92 @voyageur.net Work Phone: 612 376 -7126 Work E -mail: rharrison @voyageur.net RECEIVED JUN 161009 Subject: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Council Meeting Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 Dear Council Members: We agree with what Anne has stated below and are concerned about any increased traffic onto Arden Avenue due to changes in traffic flow elsewhere in.the Country Club neighborhood. We have two young children and currently have constant traffic speeding down our street especially during commuting hours (and relatively heavy traffic on weekends). It is clear we have people already currently using our neighborhood street as a pass- through. The way many of them drive it is likely they are not aware of the number of kids on our block. It would be devestating to see additional traffic as the likelihood of an unintended accident would increase from what it is today. It is a safety concern as Anne has stated, because our street is narrow. With cars parked on one side, it is easy for children to remain invisible to drivers until it is too late. Clearly, with our narrow street, Arden Avenue was not meant to be a thoroughfare through the neighborhood. Please maintain the current traffic flow conditions through the neighborhood to avoid increasing the traffic load on our street. Sincerely, Yvete Toivola and Jeremy Maniak 4612 Arden Avenue RECEIVED Page 1 of 1 JUN 16 2009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:02 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please say NO to Drexel island change! From: Patty Burley [mailto:patty5537 @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:39 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please say NO to Drexel island change! I am a resident of Arden Avenue and in complete agreement with all points made in the letter /email you received from Ann Scoggin on June 15 regarding the petition to eliminate the island at Drexel and Sunnyside. For the safety of all of our neighborhood residents, we ask you to not waste anyone's tax dollars to honor this petition and make this change. Thank you, Patty Burley 6/16/2009 Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED 4 JUN 16 7009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:27 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Traffic Safety on Drexel Ave. From: massiedi @aol.com [mailto:massiedi @ aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:19 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Traffic Safety on Drexel Ave. I am writing in support of the petition to change the turn on to Drexel off of Country Club Road to a standard left turn in order to slow the traffic careening around the corner and down Drexel Ave. at high speeds while lots of children are out playing in their front yards. Thank -you, Diana Massie 4608 drexel ave. Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill. 6/16/2009 RECEIVED JUN 161009 EDINA CITY COUNCIL 4801 W. 50TH Street Edina, MN 55424 I don't like the idea of having an assisted living building near 7500 York. But I know the majority in our building want the assisted living building built. I'll go along with the idea. The proposed site is too close to our building. It is common knowledge that one person from 7500 York worked hard for over a year planning this new addition according to his specification and didn't tell anyone. His plan caught everyone by surprise. We were all hoodwinked into thinking that his plan was perfect. I don't think so. I understand Ebenezer doesn't care where the building is built. The northeast corner of our campus is perfect. It's flat and a big area. That would leave our garage "as is" and most of our lovely trees left standing. I am sure my idea would cost less. A nice building on that corner would make all four corners attractive and pleasant to look at. Under the current proposal the lower apartments facing the northwest will have no view at all. No one will. buy these units with a huge building in front of their windows. I feel strongly that a new plan for the building on the northeast corner would satisfy everyone. Sincerely, Donna Nooleen Apt. 721 7500 York Cooperative r1d5k RECEIVED Page 1 of 1 JUN 16 2009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:48 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Photos illustrating safety concerns at the intersection of Drexel and Country Club Attachments: Photo Illustrations Relevant to Drexel Avenue Petition.doc From: Neale, Shannon M. (MD) ( mailto: Shannon.Neale @ParkNicollet.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:19 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Photos illustrating safety concerns at the intersection of Drexel and Country Club To City Council Members, I am bringing copies of photos illustrating the safety concerns at the intersection of Drexel and Country Club Road to City Hall tomorrow for all of you to view prior to or at the city council meeting. Attached is a summary of what the photos will illustrate. Thank you for considering this petition. Our primary motivation is the safety of all the cars and pedestrians who use this intersection. I don't know anyone who has experienced this intersection who doesn't agree it is unsafe. Please help us to fix this problem before there is a serious injury or fatality here. Thank you, Shannon Neale PRIVACY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain business confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If this e-mail was not intended for you, please notify the sender by reply e-mail that you received this in error. Destroy all copies of the original message and attachments. 311 "0 KQQ I Photo Illustrations Relevant to Drexel Avenue Petition Figure 1 Views from a car as the car starts to make the left turn from Country Club Road onto Drexel Avenue vs. Casco Avenue. The driver turning onto Drexel is blinded from what is happening on the street. Figure 2 Views from Drexel and Casco Avenues as cars are starting to turn onto those respective streets. Pedestrian, bikers and other cars can see a car turning onto Casco much more easily than they can one turning onto Drexel. Figure 3 Views from Drexel and Casco Avenues as cars make the left turn onto those respective streets.. The car turning onto Drexel needs to cross over a lane of traffic to get to the correct side of the street and has already gained significant speed going through the "sling shot" turn. Figure 4 A view of the original neighborhood plan from 1936. The island on Drexel is not original and the road was "T" off. G ea 1, -1 V:e, t V :PGJ 100K!M 1 -i a Car �� Gi► -7`� � Cr3 ;"�GKf lil , {�J! �G:!'.'j � ^f�/1 �G' ill�LY'�n� X1'1 ; ),Ile I i Gr�irD et reel- Aj 3 1 �� i / 4-it �d (a3rt-- f ,mot n r L)'Nfnt� r Y/LLA6E PF ,,aa,,,r oARK COUNTRY CLUB DISTRACT — � ,,Q,�•1 ,,,;v. ;, �,�1 � r• C. . ` E � :• „ ,•v OPaESrEATE —a r _ j,j f r' e : . airxrrr `" a +*.• t n �% Fr{'i' -i i` r•r+" tY� u.w, er N t tj �•n SF .� •; ' c. � : VV JI c � »y1Ei`';x�`!,: �t r�.� aj y•i ,Q •t'.TS..'.' §1r,'�.Sd..'ui:� a ;,t..r° '"�� LEGEND � .O 1 t : 0 2 ' 4 $ NlrN6ER A • EDINA MORNINGSIDE V 1 t c .� 1Ni si! b' if [ ; '} i SCHOOL TRACT OFFICE I 7 /1Ir����`gnyF NaA C. JECONO VOr /NG v"[�r 1r PRECINCT O•GOLFCLUB °`f B u FI }Mli�g rs k 4a 1"Irrn� +� y. as -- ---- �O` °[ E 6RAN6E HALL - ,f l .. ip r •,,S 1 ? L k s r 6 {r rnu - ar— ._9.T,v/, 90 —• —._� r- 1r�p.� t�� .r io °° I0.f[,M[ -1 � / ~� �;'. +•�i �' � �l � #'+k� rli.rf Jy i p1,M0 O z'/ 2 30"d fRAN[E Dq SNOOP/NO PrSTipiCr H t ,1 rat,?.. - }i'rru -'' -d ✓ ari,'t rti- f f r yv T � - , -7•• sir- t+°,Y�. J h r^ pa Y i o. �r P, _ °;�-- �"�".!,.'..e!..•: _le_'"t,�� •Mi� i;. k. •, F. �I �GAr �Y�q � �ys � ���• -- 4.ra ryr ,f r7 yf� rtL13 � FT3��� Pr k 1 X 3} . !G �S•S 1 ' dd . Mll 5 0 6605 Kenney Place Edina, Minnesota 55439 June 12, 2009 James B. Hovland Mayor, City of Edina 4801 W. 5& Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Mayor Hovland, On Memorial Day, I attended the Veteran's Memorial Service in Eden Prairie at its recently completed Veterans Memorial Park. It brought to mind that Edina does not have a similar memorial honoring its military veterans. Has the topic of establishing such a memorial ever been discussed by the City Council or the Department of Parks and Recreation? If so, what were the results of those discussions and in particular, the reasons why a memorial was not established? I would like to see a veteran's memorial built in Edina. Edina has an extensive park system which allows for the location of a permanent memorial; Arneson Park comes to mind as an appropriate and available site. Funding could be obtained from a variety of sources including private, business /corporate, veterans groups, as well as public or community foundation funds. It is truly an injustice to all military veterans, whether currently residing in our city or originally from this community, that Edina doesn't have a memorial which commemorates their service to their country in the time of war. I look forward to your response to this letter and your ideas on how we can go about honoring our veterans. Re ards, //1 cl-� Michael G. Goergen cc: Johri Keprios Director Department of Parks & Recreation 'r Mike Peck 5608 Benton Ave Edina, MN 55436 -2206 952- 922 -8536 Michael Siitari Edina Police Chief Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 June 12, 2009 Subject: reckless and careless driving by Edina Police — 10:20 June 11. Dear Chief, On June 11, my family and I, including children ages 4 and 7, were driving south on Highway 100. We were in the far right lane and traffic was heavy. Up ahead, I noticed an Edina Police Car parked on the far right side of the road. All of a sudden this police car darted in front of our car at a 30 -40 degree angle. We slammed on our brakes to avoid an accident and luckily were not rammed from behind. This police car then crossed directly in fr ont of a large semi truck that was along side of us, nearly causing an accident with that truck. All the while there were no lights turned on by this police car. As the police car crossed over, at a 30 -40 degree angle into the far left lane, the lights came on and a speeding driver was pulled over. The careless and reckless nature of this incident has forced me to write this letter as my wife and I feel this reckless behavior in heavy traffic must be stopped before someone is killed. I can understand the importance of trying to keep drivers within the speed limit. However, there is no justification for this type of reckless driving by your police force. Quickly darting across 3 lanes of heavy traff c will have no positive outcome at all and in time there will be an accident. Please consider changing the way your officers conduct themselves on State Highways. Sincerely, Mike Peck Cc: Mayor James Hovland Page 1 of 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:45 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Drexel Ave petition From: Richards, William C (MD) [mailto: William .Richards @ParkNicollet.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:38 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Drexel Ave petition To Edina City Council Members, I would like to voice my support for the petition regarding Drexel Ave. I believe returning the intersection of Drexel Ave. and Couintry club to its' original design would be in the best interest of safety. For those of us who witness on a daily basis the near misses of auto versus auto accidents and the often near misses of auto versus pedestrian accidents highly recommend a change in the current status. I do not believe that changing to a T- intersection would have any affect on the traffic patterns in the Country Club neighborhood. I do believe however that Drexel Ave would be a safer street as people would have to make a more intentional and safe left turn versus the current situation. Please consider our petition in the light of safety. Sincerely, William Richards, MD, MBA 4623 Drexel Ave. 952 - 926 -2216 PRIVACY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain business confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review. use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If this e-mail was not intended for you, please notify the sender by reply e-mail that you received this in error. Destroy all copies of the original message and attachments. 6/16/2009 Page 1 of 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 1'6, 2009 3:46 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Counsel Mtg. Tues. 6/16 From: mpronley @comcast.net [mailto:mpronley @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:44 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Petition for Drexel Avenue - Counsel Mtg. Tues. 6/16 To Whom it May Concern: We are Arden Avenue residents and we would like to express our reaction regarding the proposed change on Drexel Avenue. It is our fear that the proposal to remove the island and create a T intersection on Drexel will indeed divert traffic off of Drexel and onto Arden Avenue. Arden already has too much traffic as far as we are concerned. There are many small children on this street, two of which are ours. We are not at all comfortable having our children anywhere near the street as traffic is too heavy and the speed too fast. We are absolutely against any changes that will increase the amount of traffic on Arden Avenue. Thank You. Tim and Michele Pronley 6/16/2009 Susan Howl -nom: Lynette Biunno ant: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:47 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: to City council - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Alex & Ted Christianson [mailto:tofte @earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:46 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: to City council Dear City Council Members - As you are well aware, there are a ton of traffic issues in the Country Club Neighborhood and there is no need to go deep into that- I am writing to ask that you STRONGLY consider putting in a real corner on the corner of Drexel and Country Club. AS a RESIDENT who LIVES on DREXEL, I believe that a real corner would ensure that people slow down when turning onto Drexel and actually Stop when turning onto Country club. It is a safety issue not a calming issue- frankly- there is nothing that would calm the traffic in this neighborhood- if all the street construction has not deterred traffic (which it has not) then nothing will. We would like to see a real corner and not a sling shot. Honestly, at this point, I believe if would behoove the City Council to listen and trust the people on the treet which is affected. Safety is our biggest concern and some sort of good faith measure (a.e., putting a corner in) would go a long way. Thank you for your consideration - Alexandra Stegemann Christianson 1 Drexel Ave petition Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:47 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Drexel Ave petition From: Heather Dexheimer [mailto:hdexheimer @visi.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:45 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Dex Subject: Drexel Ave petition ATTENTION: EDINA CITY COUNCIL RE: DREXEL AVENUE PETITION To Whom It May Concern; Page 1 of 1 I, Heather Dexheimer and my husband, Karl Dexheimer want it to be heard that we support the Drexel Avenue petition that is going to be addressed at the City Council meeting tonight (Tuesday, June 16, 2009) at 7:00pm. We support the petition due to the fact that if we "t" off the Country Club and Drexel Avenue intersection it will promote a safer street for the 4600 block of Drexel Avenue. The island that has been at that particular intersection has created an incredibly unsafe situation for drivers turning from Country Club onto Drexel Avenue. Drivers would "shot -gun" down Drexel Avenue at ridiculous speeds creating an unsafe environment. We are NOT looking for this to have any effect on traffic calming. What we ARE looking for is for this to decrease the speed of the cars that come down Drexel Avenue thus creating a safe environment for the residence of Drexel Avenue. The majority of the intersections within the Country Club neighborhood have a "t" at the turning point, it would only make logical sense to do this at the Country Club and Drexel Avenue intersection. In the past, the Drexel Avenue residents have not had a voice in what happens on the intersection of Country Club and Drexel Avenue which is ethically wrong. Please change this in tonights meeting so that Drexel Avenue can be a safer street to live on, walk on and visit! Thank youl Heather and Karl Dexheimer 4619 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 6/16/2009 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, May 12,2009,7:00 PM Edina City Hall Communitx Room 4801 West 50 Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Chris Rofidal, Lou Blemaster, Connie Fukuda, Bob Kojetin, Robert Schwartzbauer and Elizabeth Montgomery MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean Rehkamp Larson and Joel Stegner STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya and Jackie Hoogenakker OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, HPB Consultant I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Kojetin moved approval of the meeting minutes from the April 14, 2009, meeting. Member Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificate of Appropriateness A. H -09 -5 4600 Wooddale Avenue — Construction of a new detached garage Planner Presentation Planner Repya informed the Board the subject property is located on the west side of the 4600 block of Wooddale Avenue. The existing home, and American Colonial, Revival style was constructed in 1936 and currently has a 2 -car attached garage accessed by a driveway on the north side of the property off of Bridge Street. Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 2 of 10 Planner Repya explained that the subject request involves building a new, 624 square foot detached garage in the southwest corner of the rear yard, and converting the existing 2 -stall attached garage into living space. The plan illustrates the new structure will maintain 4.5 foot setback from the side (south) lot line; and 5 foot and 4.5 foot setbacks from the rear lot line at the north and south corners. The existing driveway is19 feet in width. A new curb cut will be required from the Engineering Department for the new 24 foot wide proposed driveway off of Bridge Street. The new 2 -stall detached garage is proposed to measure 24' x 26' feet in area. The design of the structure is proposed to compliment the American Colonial Revival architectural style of the home with 9 inch clear cedar lap siding, dentil molding and corbels, and an asphalt shingled roof. Attention to detail with shuttered windows and doors is demonstrated on all four elevations. The height of the proposed garage is shown to be 18' 11" at the highest peak. The maximum height requirement set out in the revised Plan of Treatment was considered in the design of the garage, which could have been as tall as 20.35 feet when the heights of the adjacent detached garages were taken into consideration. The height at the mid -point of the gable is shown to be 13' 9 ", and a height of 9'3" is provided at the eave line. The ridge line is shown_ to be 28' in length, and the roof is designed with an 8/12 pitch. Planner Repya noted while not subject to Certificate of Appropriateness review, plans for the addition to the rear of the home have been included for the Board's information. Consultant Vogel reviewed the plans and opined that the new detached garage appears to meet the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment with respect to new construction. Furthermore, it is compatible in scale, materials, size and texture with the historic house and adjacent properties. Elaborating on the term "compatible ", it means that a new structure is capable of existing alongside historic structures; and will not cause direct harm or damage to a heritage preservation resource. In the Country Club neighborhood, compatible infill construction results in buildings that do not change the scale and character of the district. At the same time, compatible new construction does not have to match or imitate historic construction, nor should new buildings be required to be hidden from public view in order to be considered appropriate. Planner Repya concluded staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed new garage at the subject property. The following findings support the recommendation for,approval: Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 3 of 10 • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The proposed structure will compliment the architectural style of-the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent historic structures. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Plan of Treatment and Zoning Ordinance Conditions associated with the approval recommendation include: • Subject to the plans presented. • The condition that a year built-(2009) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached garage as well as the addition to the home. Appearing for the Applicant Keith and Barbara Wolf Applicant Presentation Mrs. Wolf submitted to the Board photos of current garages in the neighborhood, adding the proposed garage is comparable to new garages in the neighborhood. Mr. Wolf explained that during the design process he went back and forth between a detached vs. attached garage and after careful consideration decided that a detached garage would work best. Mr. Wolf said the existing driveway has a grade change and the driveway can get very slippery during the winter months. Mr. Wolf added the proposal will address that issue along with maintaining the character of the house and optimal use of the yard. Questions and Comments from the Board Chair Rofidal questioned if the dentil moldings and corbels will carry over from the new garage to the addition. Mr. Wolf responded in the affirmative. Chair Rofidal asked why the garage at 4602 Wooddale wasn't included. Mr. Wolf responded that garage wasn't included because of its contemporary style and that it didn't "fit" with the house. A discussion ensued with regard to the plans presented. It was observed that the corbels were not included on the plans, pointing out the plans presented should be submitted in their final form. The discussion continued on whether these types of architectural details should be a concern of the HPB. After further Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 4 of 10 discussion it was agreed if the applicant is going to use architectural details they should be noted on the final plans. Mrs. Wolf told the board they are also considering adding a cupola in the future and questioned if they add more architectural details (cupola, window boxes) would they need to appear before the HPB again. Planner Repya responded that would not be required. Chair Rofidal said if the intent is to add a cupola in the future that intent could be noted in the motion. Chair Rofidal pointed out the importance of the streetscape, adding any efforts to enhance the new garage /addition should be noted on the plans. Member Forrest said she also questions if the HPB should review the addition, pointing out the lot in question is a corner lot and the addition /remodel of the attached garage is "viewed" from the street. Board Action Member Forrest moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions and the following additional conditions: • A single overhead door instead of the double door on the plan • Corbels added to eave to match the house • 8" vs. 9" cedar siding • The homeowners have the option of adding a cupola if they choose Member Fukuda seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Member Schwartzbauer said he finds it interesting that detached garages are reviewed by the HPB but not additions. Member Schwartzbauer added he also thinks the HPB should review additions that impact the side street. Side street and front street should be viewed the same. Consultant Vogel pointed out the intent of the Plan of Treatment is to allow the property owner some leeway. Consultant Vogel pointed out the District is what is significant not each house. Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 5 of 10 B. H -09 -6 4615 Wooddale Avenue — Change in siding materials from cedar lap to artisan lap (by James Hardie) Planner Presentation Planner Repya informed the board the subject request involves a change in the siding for the new home building built at 4615 Wooddale Avenue. A final Certificate of Appropriateness for construction of a new home was approved on December 15, 2008 and was subject to the plans presented. Currently, the proponent is requesting to change the exterior siding of the home from six inch exposure cedar siding to Artisan Lap which is a new flat fiber cement siding product by James Hardie. Mr. Busyn has indicated that at the time the Heritage Preservation Board was considering the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new home, the Artisan Lap product was not available, thus six inch exposure cedar siding was proposed. However, the Artisan Lap siding which is now available is a superior product, and has the look of historic beveled lap siding while at the same time provides lower maintenance, better durability and enhanced fire safety. Mr. Busyn reported the following key features of the Artisan Lap product: e 5/8" thick lap for distinctively deep shadow lines e A smooth clear surface like cedar lap e Beveled on the back to lie flat e 6" exposure Corners can be mitered, thus eliminating the need for corner caps e Unique tongue and groove feature allows end joints to fit together Tightly for. precise fit and finish e Exceptional strength for superior handling and advanced dimensional stability e Resistant to fire, water damage, insects, harsh weather, and e Low maintenance for lasting beauty Consultant Vogel has observed that the Artisan Lap product meets the minimum requirements for new construction in historic districts as well as the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. The subject property is not an historic home; therefore the use of historic materials is not required. Furthermore, recent data shows that a majority of the historic district review commissions nation -wide allow such products to be used on infill construction in historic districts. Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 6 of 10 Mr. Vogel did express his disappointment that the "experiment" with the reconstruction of an historic house in the Country Club District appears to have been unsuccessful since the developer is unable to produce an authentic replica of a circa 1930's dwelling. He pointed out that the subject new house should be considered appropriate, but does not believe the Board should give further consideration to the idea that historic homes can be replicated, i.e., held to the Secretary of the Interior's standards for reconstruction (as opposed to rehabilitation, which allows more contemporary versions of house forms as infill construction in historic districts.) Planner Repya said staff concurs with Consultant's assertion that the Artisan Lap siding material would be deemed appropriate for this project considering that this home is in -fill construction and not an historic resource. Planner Repya concluded that staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the cedar lap siding with the James Hardie Artisan Lap dependent upon receipt of the historical and architectural documentation original required in the initial Certificate of Appropriateness for this project. Findings supporting the approval recommendation include: 1. The subject home is considered in -fill construction, and no longer deemed an historic resource. 2. Artisan Lap siding meets the minimum standard for new construction in the District's Plan of Treatment. 3. Artisan Lap siding has the attributes of cedar siding with less maintenance and increased durability. Appearing for the Applicant Scott Busyn Applicant Presentation Mr. Busyn addressed the board and explained the product before them this evening is from James Hardie. Mr. Busyn displayed the product reporting that the product is now being commonly used instead of wood. Mr. Busyn said the thickness is 5/8" providing a beveled edge nail line that casts a distinctive shadow. Continuing, Mr. Busyn said the ends can be mitered so a clean corner can be achieved with no corner caps. Mr. Busyn said in his opinion this product will make the house appear more distinctive and in certain markets it's considered a step up from wood. Concluding, Mr. Busyn said supporters of sustainable housing advocate the use of this product. Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 7 of 10 Comments and Questions from the Board Member Blemaster told board members she spoke with a contractor and he indicated to her that the product is very durable and a much thicker product than wood. The contractor also shared that cedar wood today isn't as good as it was years ago because it isn't allowed to age.' Member Blemaster concluded that the contractor also told her this type of product prevents insect infestation. Member Kojetin asked Mr. Busyn if the Hardie board is more expensive. Mr. Busyn responded in the affirmative. Continuing, Mr. Busyn said this product won't shift, requires less maintenance and is a sustainable product. Consultant Vogel explained what Mr. Busyn is proposing meets in -fill standards but does not meet reconstruction standards. Consultant Vogel said this type of product is fine when used on non - historic structures, but for historic structures, replace in kind means replace in kind. Consultant Vogel acknowledged the product is very durable and is considered a "green" material. Board Action Member Kojetin moved approval of the change in exterior building materials from cedar siding to James Hardie Artisan Lap. Member Blemaster seconded the motion. Member Forrest expressed disappointment that natural wood isn't being used on this house, but acknowledged this type of material is something the industry is moving toward. Chair Rofidal called for the vote. All voted aye; motion carried. Consultant Vogel acknowledged receipt of Mr. Busyn's historical record for 4615 Wooddale adding the documentation of the architectural elements of the home is excellent. 111. PUBLIC COMMENT: No public comment. IV. JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL: Feedback Chair Rofidal apologized for not being able to attend the joint meeting and asked Members if they would share their comments /thoughts on the meeting. Member comments are as follows: Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 8 of 10 • Felt the City Council is greatly supportive of the board and believes the HPB are the "experts" on preservation. • City Council would like the board to begin the review process for the Morningside area. • Council Members expressed that they believe the board has a "back bone" and isn't afraid of saying "No" to achieve better results. • The City Council asked how they could help the HPB. _ • There was the mention that it appears the board spends much of their time dealing with the Country Club District. • Board - members were impressed that the City Council freely gives the - HPB the authority to make changes, or suggestions to plans. • Council Members reiterated the HPB is the expert, the authority on preservation. Consultant Vogel stated it appeared to him the City Council was well prepared for the joint meeting. Consultant Vogel added some Council Members expressed surprise that some of the City's resources are being lost. Further Discussion: Member Kojetin said to him one of the biggest threats to the Country Club District is the razing of existing homes. Member Kojetin suggested that more teeth be put into the reasons to support the razing of a home in the district. Planner Repya pointed out there are two -more comptempory homes in the district with the real possibility that one day those two homes will be razed. Members agreed. Member Forrest commented that she thinks another look should be given to corner lots —front street/side street. Member Forrest pointed out the districts east/west streets aren't alleys so maybe additions with facades facing the side streets should be reviewed and a COA issued if appropriate. V. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: Planner Repya told the board the purpose of adopting annual goals and objectives is to establish priorities for ,dealing with special projects and other discretionary activities; they also provide handy benchmarks for use as performance measures. Generally, goals and objectives .refer to activities for outcomes that are not mandated by city code section which deals with the responsibilities of the HPB. Ideally, the Board's stated goals and objectives should also dovetail with the work plan of the city staff liaison and consultant. Planner Repya proposed that the Board start working on 2010 goals in January. Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 9 of 10 Planner Repya pointed out the following 2009 goals: 1) Begin work on multiple property study for Morningside bungalows. 2) Review the findings of the Minnehaha Creek and 44th & France historic resources surveys and issue findings of significance for preservation resources eligible for landmark designation. 3) Provide the Board with basic training in heritage preservation policies, practices, and procedures on a monthly basis. 4) Nominate at least one Morningside property for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. 5) One or more members attend the Minnesota Preservation Conference — September 17 —18 in Chaska, MN. 6) Sponsor a public education /outreach event for the general public. Chair Rofidal asked Consultant Vogel if people are still interested in the Mill Pond. Consultant Vogel responded there is an intense interest in the Mill Pond and the pond itself. Chair Rofidal asked if there has been any discussion on rebuilding the mill itself. Consultant Vogel responded in the affirmative. Board Members suggested that # 6 of the 2009 Goals & Objectives (Sponsor a public education /outreach event for the general public) be discussed at the June meeting if time permits. Board Members also suggested adding a seventh point to the 2009 Goals & Objectives. #7 would read: Work with the Planning Commission as the Zoning Ordinance is updated relative to heritage preservation. The following were suggested for future goals and objectives: • Compile a list or create a brochure of historic places (to bring pride to the community). • Develop a continuing education course on the history of Edina (this would not only help realtors but others) • Preservation Planning • History Day — have a display or commemoration for exposure Member Forrest moved to incorporate #7 into the Goals & Objectives for 2009. Member Kojetin seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VI. COA PROCEDURE COMMITTEE REPORT: Member Forrest said the COA procedures are scheduled to be available for final vote at the June 9th meeting. Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 12, 2009 Page 10 of 10 VII. OTHER BUSINESS: Member Repya reported that th&Preservation Conference will be held on September 22, 2009. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE: Member Repya referenced a letter from Vicky Solimany regarding the project at 4602 Bruce Avenue. IX. NEXT MEETING DATE: June 9, 2009 X. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 PM Submitted by, Join author and founder of 350.org, Bill McKibben and explorer Will Steger as they share their experiences and perspectives on climate solutions from the global to the local level. When: 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, August 18th Leo Fick Auditorium, Edina High School 6754 Valley View Road Edina, MN 55439 Directions: Park by Door #3 / South Entrance Edina Performing Arts Center Event Includes: Welcome, James Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina Clean Energy Resource Fair, 5:30 P.M. Pre -event musical entertainment provided by Edina youth For more information visit: www.globalwarming101.com To volunteer or get involved in the event, contact Paul Thompson, ptflydisc @aol.com or call (952) 920 -1547 3 AN Open to the Public Diu a Building a GLOBAL COMMITMENT one community at a time Event Sponsors: �T • y '�'9��r`L o� e ' < o Edina Community Energy and Foundation Environment Commission B Barr Engineering Co. cg g�sco W o P. e-ld P Project Earth Cool Planet Concierge in my Pocket Co>�%ity Education V. Marquette Asset Management WILL STEGER f Ser"C S __ F 0 U N D A T I 0 I` o�etit y f�cORPORX, 1888 O 200' O Business Plans s EDINA LIQUOR cif CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT Edinborough Park C I T V O F E D 1 N A O� BRAEMAR ARENA Edina k'9SNA�r�� o e 2008 Business Plans NCOR�e S� TABLE OF CONTENTS Braemar Arena Summary..................................................................................... ..............................1 BusinessStrategy Update ................................................................. ..............................1 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment ......................... ..............................3 Financial Performance .................................................................... ..............................4 Braemar Golf Course Summary..................................................................................... ..............................7 BusinessStrategy Update ................................................................. ..............................8 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment ......................... ..............................9 Financial Performance ................................................................... .............................10 Centennial Lakes & Edinborough Parks Centennial Lakes Park Summary ....................................................... .............................14 BusinessStrategy Update ................................................................ .............................15 Centennial Lakes Park Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment .........................15 EdinboroughPark Summary ............................................................. .............................16 BusinessStrategy Update ................................................................ .............................17 Edinborough Park Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment ............................... 23 Customer Analysis: 2003 - 2007 ........................................................ ............................... 26 Financial Performance ................................................................... .............................27 Communications & Marketing Department Summary.................................................................................. ............................... 30 Business Strategy Update .............................................................. ............................... 31 Financial Performance ................................................................. ............................... 33 Edina Art Center Summary.................................................................................. ............................... 35 BusinessStrategy Update .............................................................. ............................... 37 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment ...................... ............................... 40 Financial Performance ................................................................. ............................... 42 Edina Aquatic Center Summary.................................................................................. ............................... 44 BusinessStrategy Update .............................................................. ............................... 45 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment ...................... ............................... 46 CustomerAnalysis ...................................................................... ............................... 48 FinancialPerformance ................................................................. ............................... 50 Edina Liquor Summary.................................................................................. ............................... 52 BusinessStrategy Update .............................................................. ............................... 53 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment ...................... ............................... 55 FinancialPerformance ................................................................. ............................... 57 U? BRAEMAR ARENA BUSINESS PLAN 20nn ° p o �� m a m a a m m z a B R A E M A R A R E N A Braemar Arena Summary For hockey and figure skating enthusiasts, Braemar Arena, 7501 Ikola Way, features three indoor, regulation -size ice sheets. Braemar is available for open skating, group rental, adult and youth hockey and figure skating programs. The facility also offers group skating lessons for ages 4 through adult. Braemar Arena is home to the Braemar -City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, the Edina Hornets hockey teams and the Edina Hockey Association. Earnings from liquor operations continue to subsidize Braemar Arena's annual operating loss. However, all outstanding arena bonds will be repaid over the next two years. The City's construction fund provides for annual capital improvement needs. Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements The installation of a fire suppression system in 2002 in the west arena completes the necessary code compliance work at Braemar Arena. A renovation of the west arena's refrigeration and board systems is scheduled for 2010 at a cost of approximately $1.2 million (funded through the Capital Improvement Program plan). Our west arena is currently 43 years old and we don't know the life expectancy of the refrigeration system. We need to be proactive in replacing the system on our terms to avoid a breakdown and potential loss of revenues and customers. Other projects in the future include new lighting and dehumidification systems to keep the entire complex as energy efficient as possible. All outstanding arena bonds will be repaid over the next two years. Occasionally, representatives of the Edina Hockey Association and others inquire about the possibility of adding a fourth ice sheet. Staff does not support such an expansion based upon the general over - supply of indoor ice in this market. The over supply of ice typically means the prime hour definition shrinks earlier in the evening, resulting in fewer hours sold. (If you can buy Minnesota Made ice at 8 p.m., you won't buy our 9 p.m.) o0 BRAEMAR ARENA 1 B R A E M A R A R E N A 00 Advertising /Marketing Braemar Arena's principal customers continue to be Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, Edina Hockey Association, Minnesota Showcase Hockey and Edina High School. The most desirable ice time is offered to these customers. These groups represent a significant percentage of our annual revenues. Braemar and other competitive arenas are part of a web effort named "Rinkfinder.com." This website is extremely beneficial to arenas such as Braemar in that it allows staff to post ice availability online. Ice reservations and purchasing continue to be accomplished through a follow -up telephone call. We have found that this has become the most effective method of advertising. The use of Rinkfinder is free to member facilities. Lessons are advertised through our local schools by flyer and the website. This has kept our registration full through the fall - spring lesson seasons. Braemar Arena does not typically place paid advertisements. Management has felt that interest will remain strong in the operation and word of mouth will keep Braemar Arena the facility of choice among its largest customers. Pricing Braemar continues to be price- competitive with other arenas. We charge $170 per hour which tends to be within $5 to $10 of our nearest public facility. Ice availability and location is more important than price during peak season. Off -peak pricing continues to be critical, especially when it comes to developing ongoing relationships with summer hockey /figure skating schools. We don't have off -peak pricing currently but may have to consider doing so if the local private or other public facilities adjust their pricing. We charge $10 per half -hour lesson. A 10 -week session would be $100 plus a $7.50 registration fee. BRAEMAR ARENA 2 B R A E M A R A R E N A Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment As noted earlier, indoor ice is over supplied in our market. The recent opening of new ice sheets at Minnetonka High School, Eden Prairie and Minnesota Made in Edina has further exacerbated this situation. During peak season, Monday, Tuesday and Thursday night primetime ice can never be supplied in quantities to meet everyone's desire. This has led to the perception that ice is in short supply, thus leading to overbuilding which requires increased subsidization. It also leads to users having the luxury of "shopping" other facilities for more desirable ice times. us ' �i1•Y1 .. 19 • To date, there has not been a major impact from the opening of Minnesota Made in Edina. Minnesota Made has actually helped the Edina Hockey Association and girls' high school team with events that Braemar was previously unable to accommodate. Minnesota Made's AAA hockey camps and teams operate on a 12 -month basis and are a different clientele than Braemar's regular users. While Braemar lost some of their ice time in the summer, others have purchased what they had. Braemar has picked up some of their overflow during their tournament weekends with its extra hours in the off - season. That ice time would normally not sell. Minnesota Made will charge $215 per hour during the 2008 -2009 season, compared with $170 at Braemar. Braemar is at an advantage with respect to competing for out -of -town ice customers due mainly to its central and convenient location in the market. Management believes that with the advent of Rinkfinder.com, Braemar wins rather than loses customers seeking ice time. In other words, fewer Edina -based ice users buy ice at Braemar. Management believes this is mainly location- driven. Braemar also has a competitive advantage because of its efficient floor plan, especially for tournaments utilizing several rinks. Braemar is at somewhat of a competitive disadvantage due to the age of the main arena as well as the lack of meeting rooms, weight- training facilities and deluxe locker rooms. In management's judgment, however, such facilities do not necessarily contribute to the bottom line. (W BRAEMAR ARENA 3 B R A E M A R A R E N A BRAEMAR ARENA O o FINANUTAL PERFORMANCE Net Income: 2005 -2007 Retail Sales Memberships Admissions Building Rental Equipment Rental Class Registration & Other Fees Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses: Cost of Goods Sold Personnel Services Contractual Services Commodities Central Services Depreciation Total Operating Expenses $10,000 4,004 71,619 1,151,012 3,759 135,214 1 '17R Rn7 1,271 564,919 538,475 50,002 39,200 1-1 r A A i_ fjjweauiiv niwataci(LOSS) ($120,824) Non - Operating Revenue /(Expense) Interest and Fiscal Charges (24,911) Amortization (2,246) Other Miscellaneous 914 Total Non - Operating Expense (26,243) $9,902 5,601 92,728 1,143,211 4,218 162,895 Al o CLC 1,128 580,849 563,845 49,754 47,606 nno nIf, 1,542,098 (123,543) (18,866) (2,246) (21,112) $9,564 4,355 109,010 1,136,504 3,916 150,824 7 A 4 A 4- 795 569,364 578,895 52,687 43,945 292,720 (124,233) (14,159) (2,246) 26,709 10,304 Loss Before Transfers ($147,067) 1 ($144,655) I ($113,929) 2007 non - operating revenue includes a lump sum payment from Pepsi for an exclusive multi -year contract. BRAEMAR ARENA 4 B R A E M A R A R E N A BRAEMAR ARENA FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Historical Analysis of Subsidies 2007 $80,000 Edina Liquor 2007 $25,000 Capital Improvement Fund 2006 $85,000 Edina Liquor 2006 $25,000 Capital Improvement Fund 2005 $41,000 Edina Liquor 2005 $45,000 Capital Improvement Fund 2004 $103,000 Edina Liquor 2004 $74,430 Capital Improvement Fund 2003 $8,000 Golf Dome 2003 '1,; $6,149 Capital Improvement Fund 2002 $90,157 Capital Improvement Fund 2001 $135,000 Edina Liquor 2001 $75,189 Capital Improvement Fund 2000 $81,000 Edina Liquor 1999+ $525,000 Edina Liquor 1999 $35,000 Golf Dome 1998 $222,000 Edina Liquor 1998 $40,000 Golf Note: Subsidy amount is based on cash position of fund, not performance. BRAEMAR ARENA B R A E M A R A R E N A FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE BRAEMAR ARENA Future Debt Payments (1992 Bond) 2008 220,000 I 11,230 I 231,230 2009 225,000 4,162 229,162 Total $445,000 1 $15,392 1 $460,392 BRAEMAR ARENA of Ca�dN-'q- Op0 BUSINESS PLAN 2nn0000 0 U p d�,�� n rn n O O r rn n O C m B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E Braemar Golf Course Summary Braemar Golf Course's cash position has changed the most significantly of any City of Edina enterprise in recent years. As of Dec. 31, 2007, the Golf Course Fund's cash balance was more than $1.1 million in the red. Rounds of golf in Minnesota have been on the rise as of late, seeing a 1 percent increase between 2006 and 2007. However, despite golf's large economic upswing and stable following, some individual courses in the State have been feeling the pinch. Braemar Golf Course, which consistently accommodates a solid 65,000 rounds of golf per year, has declined from a high of nearly 85,000 rounds in 1999. Until golf rebounds to its position of the late 1990s, the City must be careful about its spending at Braemar and look for additional ways to grow revenue. In 2008, non - resident patron cards were offered to people who work in Edina. In 2009, non - resident patron cards will be offered to all non - residents. An extensive marketing campaign, including outdoor advertising, should be launched promoting the non - resident patron card program. The operation of the grill and its menu could be studied during the offseason. While wine is now available at Braemar, sales have been slow, which could be due, in part, to a limited menu. Brookview Golf Course, operated by the City of Golden Valley, is one of many similar courses to complete such a study and implement a more expansive menu, appealing to guests year round and increasing revenues. Revenues at the Braemar Golf Dome are stable, but it should be noted that the Dome's success is contingent on weather and competition. To maintain Braemar's premier status, future improvements should be considered. However, capital improvements have been put on hold for a number of years due to the financial constraints of debt service from prior improvements, including the purchase of Fred Richards Executive Course and the expansion at Braemar Golf Course. 7 B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E 8 Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements Most of Braemar's planned capital improvements have been put on hold for a number of years due to the financial constraints of the debt service from prior improvements, including the purchase of Fred Richards Executive Golf Course and the expansion of Braemar. Capital improvements could include reconfiguring the driving range to increase the length and hitting capacity by over 40 percent (which by necessity will include some reconfiguration of the executive course) and redesigning the new nine to improve playability. The improvements could be done in phases with minimal income loss with a quick return on investment and long -term profitability. Marketing /Advertising Braemar continues to be recognized as one of the premier public golf courses in Minnesota. The patron card philosophy continues to work well to establish customer loyalty from our residents. Based on this experience, a non - resident patron card is being offered to increase Braemar's core customer base. Due to the competitive environment, a more aggressive advertising approach, including television and radio spots and outdoor advertising, is pursued for the Golf Dome and the Golf Course. The southwest metropolitan area will be targeted during a campaign promoting the non - resident patron card, as that is the obvious market. Pricing of Services The construction of additional golf courses in the metropolitan area, general economic conditions and the demographics of our customers affect our pricing structure. Pricing is a particularly important issue to our senior golfers who display a keen interest in value and who are willing to travel to more distant facilities offering cheaper rates. With the overbuilding of golf in the metropolitan area, we must continue to be particularly sensitive to our price point in the market. B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment Braemar Golf Course continues to provide a premier golf facility in the metropolitan area. Course quality, location and customer service continue to distinguish Braemar from other courses. Notwithstanding these features, Braemar has experienced fluctuations in the number of regulation rounds played during the past few years. The following summarizes regulation rounds played during the past three years: Regulation Courses 2005 65,764 2006 62,706 2007 63,812 2008* 64,688 'Through November 2008 Executive Course 23,001 23,512 22,510 22,010 Richards Executive 25,995 27,461 26,499 25,875 The variations in rounds are primarily due to weather. The increase in rounds at Richards for 2006 and 2007 appear to come from increased marketing and the non - resident patron card. Future improvements to Braemar's golf facilities are designed to maintain its competitive position. Management must carefully evaluate these improvements for their cost/benefit in light of the above -noted volatility in the golf business and the Golf Course Fund's current negative cash balance. A reconfiguration of the driving range is proposed, but put on hold, to expand the number of tees and improve safety. This improvement will encroach into the executive course, which will likewise require some reconfiguration. In 2006, management proposed redesigning several fairways on the new nine (holes 19 -27) to make the course more playable for the average golfer. This improvement is also currently on hold. The current golf environment continues to be competitive and challenging. Braemar, Fred Richards and the Golf Dome remain some of the strongest operations in this weakened marketplace. It is essential to maintain facilities and aggressively market to maintain market share. <<Y d 1 G G iW B R A E M A R G O L F 10 C O U R S E FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE BRAEMAR & FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSES Net Income: 2005 -2007 Operating Revenues Liquor Sales $84,945 $108,898 $125,220 Retail Sales 253,602 280,861 252,959 Concessions 223,597 231,993 222,844 Memberships 109,911 113,899 106,040 Building Rental 61,946 57,894 65,248 Rental of Equipment 368,258 398,833 389,156 Greens Fees 1,741,561 1,772,173 1,794,940 Other Fees 340,275 336,649 328,051 Total Operating Revenues 3,184,095 3,301,200 3,284,468 Orwatina Expenses Cost of Goods Sold 329,948 374,161 356,912 Personnel Services 1,585,916 1,578,077 1,628,921 Contractual Services 350,596 417,716 412,974 Commodities 334,527 346,445 340,394 Central Services 112,973 93,933 96,039 Depreciation 422,389 395,699 395,158 Total Operating Expenses 3,136,349 3,206,031 3,230,398 Operating Income 47,746 95,169 54,070 Non - operating Revenue (Expense) Interest and Fiscal Charges (126,971) (108,933) (87,562) Amortization (4,830) (4,830) (3,678) Other Miscellaneous (3,360) 6,999 39,188 Total non - operating Revenue (135,161) (120,762) (52,052) Ci101191-- Iii ivcL P%004U 0 (87,415) (25,593) 2,018 �j B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E FINANCIAL PLRFORMANCE BRAEMAR GOLF DOME Net Income: 2005 -2007 lJpeiawlq rievvclues Retail Sales $4,011 $4,202 $3,290 Concessions 4,854 5,310 4,014 Admissions 275,599 319,653 285,066 Building Rental 14,281 13,438 14,867 Total Operating Revenues 298,745 342,603 307,237 Oneratina Expenses Cost of Goods Sold 3,864 3,894 2,858 Personnel Services 93,616 104,920 106,460 Contractual Services 131,672 141,915 138,915 Commodities 14,064 10,217 10,638 Central Services 9,516 9,540 10,368 Depreciation 46,404 45,449 25,531 Total Operating Expenses 299,136 315,935 294,770 Operating Income. (391) 26,668 12,467 Non -oper° ' - - -iue (Expense) Interest and Fiscal Charges (8,943) (7,084) (4,908) Amortization (661) (661) (661) Other Miscellaneous 102 1,121 2,696 Total non - operating Revenue (9,502) (6,624) (2,873) Change in Net Assets (9,893) 20,044 9,594 �y. 11 B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E FINANCIAL PLKFORMANGE GOLF COURSE FUND CASH POSITION Past 10 Fiscal Years 1998 (673,890) 1999 (345,012) 2000 54,973 2001 (80,966) 2002 79,306 2003 (32,084) 2004 (370, 786) 2005 (621,080) 2006 (874,384) 2007 (1,128,639) BRAEMAR GOLF DOME Future Debt Service Payments —1992 Bond 2008 65,000 3,744 68,744 2009 70,000 1,295 71,295 Total 135,000 5,039 140,039 `,tq of Ep 12 B R A E M A R G O L F C 0 U R S E FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE BRAEMAR & FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSES Future Debt Service Payments Year Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2008 $200,000 $11,395 $195,000 $53,288 $50,000 $13,078 $445,000 $77,761 2009 185,000 3,423 210,000 44,678 50,000 10,953 445,000 59,054 2010 - - 215,000 35,486 50,000 8,790 265,000 44,276 2011 - - 225,000 25,916 55,000 6,506 280,000 32,422 2012 - - 230,000 15,963 60,000 3,990 290,000 19,953 2013 - - 245,000 5,451 60,000 1,335 305,000 6,786 Total $385,000 $14,818 $1,320,000 $180,782 $325,000 $44,652 $2,030,000 $240,252 4 , CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Fkhr botough Pa& C I} r O f E o 1 N A BUSINESS PLAN '0000 m v_m zz Om �z O? CD Or 2 r MD Dm �N X cl) 90 C E N T E N N I A L LAKES & E D I N B O R O U G H PAR KS Centennial Lakes Park Summary Centennial Lakes continues to provide a very unique recreational experience for Edina and the metropolitan area. Centennial Lakes, a 24 -acre park and pond, offers the ultimate urban escape. The park features more than 1.5 miles of paved pathways meandering around a 10 -acre lake and interspersed with beautifully landscaped grounds, formal and informal seating areas, swinging benches and fountains. During the summer months, visitors can rent paddleboats, fish in the ponds for sunfish, bass and bullheads, watch remote - controlled sailboat races, explore the maze or try their luck on the bent grass putting course or croquet and lawn bowling courts. The park also hosts a variety of cultural performances in a 1,000 -seat lakeside amphitheater. At the Park Centrum building, visitors can rent banquet space for weddings, business meetings and social events. In the winter months, Centennial Lakes Park offers one of the Twin Cities' finest outdoor skating venues. Visitors can skate across 10 acres of carefully maintained ice or take a spin on one of the park's Norwegian ice sleds. Afterwards, guests can relax by one of the Centrum building's three fireplaces while sipping a cup of hot chocolate from the concession stand. For the convenience of park visitors, Centennial Lakes rents figure and hockey skates for children and adults. Putting course revenues, paddle boat rentals, rental of ice skates and private building rentals are the main sources of self - generated revenue. Association fees charged to residents and business in the Centennial Lakes area continue to be the principal revenue source for Centennial Lakes and Edinborough parks, but are not expected to keep pace with inflation. Operating losses continue, with losses currently being covered out of the park's trust and adversely affecting the interest income from the trust. (0 f nI# -- -_ I CENTENNIAL E nh LAKES PARK c I i 1 o f t 0 1 N A C E N T E N N I A L LAKES & E D I N B O R O U G H PAR KS 15 Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements The majority of capital improvement dollars continue to be spent maintaining and replacing existing infrastructure. Planned projects include paver replacements and the painting of ornamental metal throughout the park. Marketing Since many of the fee -based amenities in the park are near capacity much of the season, the focus of the marketing plan at Centennial Lakes has been on using low -cost means to promote the park to existing park patrons, Centennial Lakes residents and businesses and the greater metropolitan area. These efforts center on the use of brochures, posters and newspaper listings to increase awareness of the park and to remind patrons of the park's amenities. Additional marketing is being directed toward promoting the putting course and lawn games area to increase usage during off -peak times. Marketing will include advertisements in the Sun Newspapers and coupon distribution at the Centennial Lakes Office Buildings and Village Homes. Pricing of Services The amenities at Centennial Lakes tend to be priced equal to or slightly higher than comparable amenities at other facilities. Although price increases for building rentals have had no effect on the number of rentals, recent increases in putting course fees, paddleboat rentals and ice skate rentals may be partly to blame for decreased numbers of users in those areas. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment Centennial Lakes continues to be an exceptional venue in the metropolitan area. Studies have found that over 80 percent of park patrons come from outside Edina. In addition, the recent community opinion survey listed Centennial Lakes as the facility most heavily used by Edina residents. The uniqueness of the park and its recreational and social offerings are major factors in this popularity. CENTENNIAL FAn ug Paj� LAKES PARK c T:` -ro- F o- i N oN C E N T E N N I A L LAKES & E D I N BOROUGH PAR KS The Centennial Lakes putting course, paddleboat rentals and lawn games continue to do well although user numbers have remained relatively stagnant the past few years. No new competitors have emerged recently, and the Oakdale putting course was forced to close in 2005. The Centennial Lakes ice skating rink is the major winter draw at the park, but warm winters have cut into skater numbers and revenues in recent years. The Park Centrum is a popular option for wedding receptions, business meetings and banquets. Even with weekend rates approaching $1,000, the facility is booked solid in the summer and fall. Opportunities exist for increased revenues during off -peak months and weekdays. Edinborough Park Summary With more than 6,000 plants, trees and flowers, Edinborough Park is Minnesota's unique indoor public park. The completely enclosed, one -acre park features a junior - Olympic size swimming pool, a running track and fitness area, a huge indoor playground and a multi - purpose room and play area, all connected by meandering pathways through the densely landscaped interior. In its 250 -seat, Greek -style amphitheater, Edinborough Park presents a full schedule of free cultural arts programs in the areas of music, dance, theater and visual arts from September to May of each year. Edinborough Park continues to provide a unique recreational experience for Edina and the metropolitan area. Playpark admissions, birthday parties and season passes are the main sources of self - generated revenue. Association fees charged to residents and businesses in the Edinborough area continue to be a principal revenue source for Edinborough and Centennial Lakes parks, but are not expected to keep pace with inflation. Operating losses continue, with losses currently being covered out of the parks' trust, which adversely affects interest income. CENTENNIAL afin�")(')�'� ugh LAKES PARK C i, -- 0 , —I F o f N � IN M C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & - E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements A change in philosophy to charge admission to Edinborough Park and the addition of the Adventure Peak play structure in 2003 have greatly increased the appeal of Edinborough Park to Edina residents and metropolitan families and have dramatically increased park admission revenues. To better meet the needs of our customers, provide better security for the Park's resources, staff and customers, and to generate significant additional revenues, it is recommended to make several changes to the facility in the next few years. Staff proposes to hire an architect and engineering consultants to complete a feasibility study and make recommendations for a variety of proposed significant facility improvements, including: 1. Park Office and Admissions Expansion 2. Upper Restroom Expansion 3. Upper Level Concessions Stand and Seating Area 4. Conversion of Catering Kitchen Into Lower Level Restrooms 5. Lower Level Locker Room Expansion 6. Track and Fitness Area Expansion 7. Accessibility to Track and Exercise Equipment Area 8. Increased Storage The following is a description of park improvement needs and alternatives that staff recommends as part of a comprehensive feasibility study. Park Office /Admissions /Concessions /Upper Level Restrooms The current admissions office is significantly undersized and is in the wrong location to effectively, efficiently and securely serve paying customers. Would -be paying customers often leave the park as they first walk in because the long lines give them the false impression that the park is over - crowded. Estimates show that in 2007 over 210,000 people visited the Playpark, 40,000 people visited the Pool/Track and 20,000 attended birthday parties at the Park. Edinborough scheduled more than 1,100 birthday parties from July 2007 to May 2008. TI that checked in at the Park Office. An additional 15,000 attend c 17 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK cos M e �.1 CENTENNIAL LAKES & ED IN B OR O U G H P A R K S Amphitheater annually. A busy winter day can easily attract 3,000 people to the Park Office, creating long lines and congestion in the admissions office area. The restrooms on the upper level are located just on the other side of the Park Office. These two restrooms are significantly undersized for the demand, which results in long waits and long lines. Those lines create even more congestion at and around the Park Office Admissions Area. A redesign of the upper level area should include expansion of the two upper level restrooms. Concessions and adequate restrooms continue to be the most requested amenities. Park staff would like to explore the renovation of the cul -de -sac entrance and northeast corner of the Park to include a new Park Admissions Office and administrative offices, concession area and expand the existing upper level restrooms. There are, however, other alternatives that need to be studied that might be less costly and more feasible. For example, there might be an opportunity to lease office space from United Properties to provide new park administration offices and /or a concessions stand. This option may allow relocation and expansion of the admissions office within the existing interior footprint of Edinborough Park. However, this option does not provide necessary seating for a concessions operation. A concession stand with seating area is estimated to generate between $100,000 and $150,000 in net revenues annually for the Park, in addition to meeting a primary need of our customers. There are currently four tables in the Park's upper commons area for people to meet, socialize and eat. Due to the popularity of this area, management was forced to put a time limit on the use of the tables so that more people can access them. Since Thelma's Deli closed in 2004, the only food for purchase in the facility is from vending machines on the lower level, plus ice cream products sold at the admissions office on the upper level. As a result, the majority of our customers bring in food from home or have to leave the complex to get fast food. The Park currently generates $15,000 in commissions from snack and beverage vending companies and from the sale of ice cream in the Park Office. Ice cream sales are limited due to long lines at Park Admissions Office. A portable concession stand could be purchased in 2010 to generate additional concession revenues while waiting for a permanent concession facility. This would cost approximately $25,000. The Park Manager's and Assistant Manager's officers are located on the lower level in a converted maintenance storage room and dressing room in the maintenance tunnel, which has no view of the park, removed from all administrative staff and has inadequate ventilation. There is no space on the upper level to deal with either customers or staff in a private setting. CENTENNIAL �+,(firbo� LAKES PARK c— Y - o -r e o i N. C E N T E N N I A L LAKES & ED IN B OR O U G H P A R K S One alternative would be to rent space from United Properties at the Corporate East Center. Another option would be to create permanent administrative offices on the upper level as part of an expansion project. Conversion of Catering Kitchen into Lower Level Restrooms It is also recommended to add restrooms on the lower level of the Park, preferably in the area previously used as a catering kitchen. The only restroom facility available to our young customers is on the upper level on the opposite end of the Park from Adventure Peak. We have many "accidents" in the Park that could be eliminated with restroom facilities located on the same level in close proximity to Adventure Peak and the Great Hall. The upper level restrooms are too small and are located too far away from the play areas in the Park. This is currently scheduled as a 2009 CIP project, estimated to cost $60,000. Lower -Level Locker Room Expansion The existing locker rooms are grossly undersized, have poor drainage and poor ventilation. The changing areas in both locker rooms can accommodate just three or four people comfortably at one time, making it difficult for Edina Community Education classes, Edina Swim Club and all of the Park's regular fitness customers. The hallway from the pool to the locker rooms is long and cold and the Park has no "family" locker rooms. When families come to the Park needing family locker facilities, staff gives them access to a dressing room in the employee area of the Park next to the Manager's office. There are no showers there and they are forced to walk through the Park in their swimming suits. Track and Fitness Area Expansion Edinborough Park currently has a 1/16 -mile, three -lane indoor track with exercise equipment tucked into the corners on the east and west ends. The area includes two elliptical machines, two treadmills, two recumbent bikes, two upright bikes, a multi- station weight machine and a rower. In order to accommodate more people and relieve the crowded conditions, the track could be lengthened and an aerobic equipment and weight room could be added. According to the most recent Needs Assessment Study, Edina residents are interested in more indoor and outdoor walking venues. Land is available for this type of expansion to the north of the existing pool and track. Youth - specific fitness equipment could also be added to attract pre- teen and teenagers to exercise while combating youth obesity. The existing track floor is 20 years old and is in need of replacement in the next five years. Another option would be to keep the existing floor plan of the track, but eliminate the walking track and use the floor space for additional aerobic and weight equipment. Additional treadmills would be a more user - friendly alternative to the current short, small, sloped walking /running track. f . n#1 -- CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK c i r r o r [ o I H A C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H PARKS Accessibility to Track and Exercise Equipment Area Currently, there are five steps on a five -foot wide walkway and stairway leading to the track/fitness area, making it difficult or impossible for seniors and people with canes or walkers to access the track/ fitness area. A person in a wheelchair must contact the Park Office to have staff walk them outside and let them in an outside door to the track area. There are customers in wheelchairs and others with mobility challenges who request access to the track area. The track entrance is in the northeast corner of the Park, adjacent to the water heater closet, restrooms and Park Office. This is a challenging accessibility issue that needs a permanent solution. Storage Indoor and outdoor storage is needed for supplies and equipment. The Park was built with very limited storage. The Park's primary storage room is located adjacent to the pool and is very warm with high humidity in a corrosive environment. As part of the feasibility study, more indoor and outdoor storage should be part of the analysis. The following is a description of additional miscellaneous equipment and facility repairs, replacements and additions. HVAC, Pool Pak, Water Heater and Holding Tanks The Park's HVAC System (McQuays) is more than 20 years old, nearing or at the end of its life expectancy and very energy inefficient. The roof -top HVAC McQuays units are original to the Park and extremely inefficient. The Park's hot water heater and holding tanks are nine years old and are also nearing the end of their life expectancy. Replacing these units would provide consistent service and significant energy savings to the facility. The McQuays HVAC roof -top units are scheduled for replacement in 2009 in the CIP at a cost of approximately $500,000. Adventure Peak Adventure Peak is designed for children ages 2 to 12. There is a small toddler area in the structure and also an inflatable jumper specifically designated for children 5 and under. The upper levels of the play structure are intimidating for many kids under the age of 4 or 5, especially when the Park is very busy. The majority of our customers have children under CENTENNIAL afar orow -h Pajk LAKES PARK c ", -o -�F 0 1 N o� 2• C E N T E N N I A L LAKES & E D I N BOROUGH PAR KS the age of 5 and would like more play space designated specifically to kids ages 1 to 5. To meet this need, staff is recommending the addition of portable play equipment geared toward our youngest customers. Staff will continue to research and provide new and fresh ideas for this space. Pool Renovation The pool shell is in need of resurfacing and the tile floor and walls in the pool area are in need of replacement. There is currently $80,000 planned in the CIP in the year 2012 for this project. As that timeframe approaches, staff recommends that decision makers consider upgrading the will -be 25- year -old lap pool to include zero -depth entry, splash pool, slides or other amenities. The existing 25 -yard lap pool serves a limited number of aquatic recreation needs. However, new and exciting aquatic amenities should be considered before investing significant dollars into maintaining the status quo. If there is a desire to expand the pool to offer new opportunities, a consultant needs to be hired to study the feasibility and costs. Mini Golf There is also potential for adding an indoor mini golf course as an amenity for our customers. This is a concept that could be considered as part of the large upper -level expansion project. Funding Alternatives There are limited funding alternatives for the proposed large expansion projects. One option is to use the remaining Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Park trust fund, which currently has a balance of approximately $3.5 million. The original concept was to rely on interest earnings from the trust fund to help offset operating expenses. Over 50 percent of the trust fund's principal has been used over the past 20 years to cover operational expenses that have been in excess of revenues. By using the trust fund principal balance, even less interest earnings will be available to offset operational expenses. Staff continues to explore new additional revenues and operational efficiencies to come closer to a financially self- sufficient operation. Without a trust fund principal to rely on to cover annual operating losses, the Park operations will then have to rely on a tax subsidy to sustain. There are a number of park improvements that would increase revenues, such as a concessions stand and expanded track and exercise area. Without continually making new improvements or correcting existing known issues, the revenue stream will plateau and begin to decrease each year while operating expenses climb. A steady capital improvement plan budget is critical to the long -term financial success of the park. 1 21 CENTENNIAL Fxbribo�1�� Pa� LAKES PARK c `r r` - 0- F o- I N e oM CENTENNIAL LAKES & ED IN B OR O U G H P A R K S Another funding alternative to consider could include a voter supported referendum. However, if the referendum fails, there needs to be a realistic fall -back plan. Donations and grants are another option to consider; but those approaches offer no guarantee for success. Marketing Surveys of Park rental customers show that 75 percent of clients heard about Edinborough Park by attending a prior event at the Park or by word of mouth. Prior to the explosion of the internet in the past five years, the majority of the Park's advertising dollars were spent on the Yellow Pages. The Yellow Pages provided the largest percentage of leads at 15 percent. With the growth of the internet and less of a reliance on the Yellow Pages, staff has cut back advertising every year. Very little marketing for the Play Park, including Adventure Peak, has been done or has been necessary due to the word -of -mouth advertising in the community. The Edinborough Park website continues to be very popular and staff uses it extensively to market events, programs, schedules and amenities. Staff will use the City's existing communications vehicles, including "City Extra" and newsletters, and is working to compile mailing lists to directly market to families and groups who utilize the facility. There is great potential to grow the business during the summer months and staff believes that group visits would be a profitable and cost effective method to bring customers to the Park. Pricing of Services Playpark With play amenities and unique environments, Edinborough Park is priced in the mid to upper price range compared to the competition. The prices of the competition are all in the $5.00 - $5.50 range, but only include the play structure. Our facility provides an even better value with the Great Hall as a very popular amenity. Edinborough Park/Adventure Peak New Brighton /Eagles Nest Maple Grove /Maple Maze Eagan /Blast Woodbury/Lookout Ridge CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK $5.50 $5.00 $4.50 $5.00 $5.33 W ` � • 1ga • No- C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R KS 23 - oW PoollTrack It is more difficult to provide rates for comparable facilities for our fitness area, which includes pool and track. Most community centers offer full - service fitness centers with classes and many also include an indoor water park, splash pool or something similar. Daily individual admissions for community centers are as follows: Eden Prairie: $7.50 - $9.50 daily; $24 monthly New Brighton: $5.50 daily; $225 annual Maple Grove: $6.00 daily Shoreview: $6.00 daily; $54 for 10 Admission Pass Eagan: $10 daily; $32 monthly Waconia: $6.92 daily; $21.57 monthly Chaska: $5.75 daily Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment Adventure Peak has continued to exceed expectations both in terms of visitors and revenues 2004 and 2005 Playpark admission revenues exceeded $365,000. 2006 revenues exceeded $425,000, 2007 revenues exceeded $450,000 and $460,000 is budgeted for 2008. There was a concern that once the "uniqueness" of Adventure Peak wore off, numbers would level or slowly decline. Attendance and revenues have continued to increase since the opening in 2003. Park staff recommends periodic improvements to Adventure Peak and the Great Hall in order to add new and exciting amenities to keep it fresh. $30,000 was invested in improvements to Adventure Peak in 2006 and $50,000 was invested in 2008. Other improvements are recommended to increase revenues, provide a better customer experience and improve overall Park safety and security. Edinborough Park continues to be a facility that provides recreational opportunities for people of all ages. While Adventure Peak and The Great Hall Playpark are attractive to young families, it is also a great outlet for grandparents and parents just looking for an exciting family activity. The Amphitheater offers programming for adults on Sunday and Tuesday evenings. The big bands and smaller group entertainment appeals to people of all ages, particularly adults. Entertainment for children is offered at noon on Thursdays in the amphitheater. CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK c , r 0 ! F D i N A CENTENNIAL LAKES & ED IN B OR O U G H P A R K S The long -range business plan is to utilize the Great Hall as a multi - purpose facility for a variety recreation uses. The plan is to use the Great Hall as a fun and safe Playpark during the day for primarily young children ages 2 to 10 and their supervising adults. New portable play amenities will routinely be introduced to keep the Playpark fresh and exciting. The Great Hall will be used as a social hall for important City- sponsored functions and special events, such as the Mayor's State of the City Address, the Volunteer Awards Recognition Reception and Edina Community Foundation Gala. Currently, Edinborough Park attracts guests from all over the state and even the upper Midwest. Groups travel over an hour to spend the day at the Park. Guests from outside of Minnesota choose to stay at the adjacent Marriott Residence Inn because of the amenities the Park offers. Edina residents represent 20 percent of daily admissions. In the past year, an estimated 12,535 Edina youth visited Edinborough. Since adults are not charged admission, they are not included in this number. Over 63,000 youth participate annually in the recreational, social, educational and physical activities offered at Edinborough. Season Passes and Punch Cards Edina residents prefer to purchase season passes because of affordable pricing and a convenient location. Fifty -nine percent of our Adventure Peak season pass holders are Edina residents, while 79 percent of pool and track members are residents. This totals 167 Adventure Peak season pass holders and 371 (including Edinborough Association) pool and track members who are Edina residents. We also sell punch cards for our regular park patrons. Twenty -three percent of patrons who purchase punch cards for Adventure Peak are residents of Edina. This totals 478 cards sold to Edina residents over the past year. If each card holder used their passes, this would be another 4,780 visits last year. Forty -two percent of Edinborough Park pool and track punch card patrons are Edina residents. This totals 144 pool and track punch cards purchased by Edina residents in 2007. Private Rentals Private rentals of Edinborough Park have been declining since 2004. In 2007, the Park Board voted unanimously to support staff's recommendation that private rentals of the Park be discontinued in 2009. Increases in birthday party revenues, concession revenues and general admission revenues will cover the lost revenues from private events. The staff and resources will be focused on providing the best possible facility and experience to our expanding family oriented customer base. CENTENNIAL ahnborotigh Park LAKES PARK C i l Y 0 r F D I N CENTENNIAL LAKES & ED IN B OR O U G H P A R K S Based on recent revenues, staff expects to generate $115,000 in revenues from birthday party rentals. By eliminating private rentals, there will likely be more than $75,000 a year from added revenues sources. Birthday party rentals (which do not require any Park closures) will bring in approximately $40,000 in additional revenues. Additional general admissions are estimated to bring at least another $10,000 in additional revenues. Additional association fees (due to the justification for increasing their daily admission fee to $5) should generate approximately $12,000 in additional revenues. A new concessions stand business is estimated to produce an additional $100,000 in revenues. In summary, the additional revenues are predicted to be: Additional Birthday Party Rentals $ 40,000 Additional General Admissions $ 10,000 Additional Association Admissions $ 12,000 New Concessions $100,000 TOTAL $162,000 These additional revenues do not take into account the cost savings for extending life span of the facility and equipment. It is also worthy to mention that the Park's initial revenue forecasts for Adventure Peak's daily admissions were originally estimated at $220,000 per year. The Park is now exceeding $450,000 a year in revenues for Adventure Peak and staff anticipates that revenues will exceed $460,000 in 2008. Adventure Peak's daily admissions statistics suggest that Adventure Peak is not just a trend or flash in the pan, but by all indications will continue to increase in popularity simply by word of mouth. Continuing to provide new and exciting improvements will go a long way to keep daily admissions strong and profitable. Between September 2003 and June 2007, private rental totals were inflated because birthday party revenues were going into the private rental budget account. In July of 2007, staff made the accounting change to separate those accounts. Unique Venue Edinborough Park continues to be a unique venue in the metropolitan area. Indoor park and community center users continually shop for the newest amenities. Maple Grove, Eagan, Woodbury and New Brighton provide leading -edge facilities. The addition of Adventure Peak has successfully positioned Edinborough Park to be competitive with the newer parks in the metro area. CENTENNIAL &fir — LAKES PARK C ;: 0 F o I N A C E N T E N N I A L LAKES & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Staff believes that for Edinborough to be successful it is essential to continue to maintain high standards of cleanliness and safety and to add new amenities to keep the facility fresh and exciting. The Park provides a safe and fun place for families to play and exercise in a climate controlled environment. Edinborough is unique in several aspects. It is the largest play structure in the area; the Great Hall provides a large open play space; an exceptional record of safety, cleanliness and upkeep to keep the facility and equipment in "like new" condition; and the financial support of the City of Edina, our revenues and our trust fund to provide for regular maintenance and improvements /additions to the play equipment. Equally as important, Edinborough has full -time staff who has been trained to maintain and inspect the play structure on a daily basis. Without daily inspections, cleaning and maintenance, the structure would not be holding up as well as it has for the past five years. Some private companies have unsuccessfully attempted to capitalize on the "indoor play" market. The high cost of equipment, equipment replacement, insurance, building leases, marketing and staffing are difficult to overcome. Edinborough has been providing a unique and safe play environment for the past 20 years and has established an outstanding reputation in the metro area and also statewide. Customer Analysis: 2003 -2007 Edinborough Playpark season pass customers comprise 59 percent Edina residents, 17 percent Minneapolis, 8 percent Bloomington, 4 percent Richfield and 12 percent from Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Farmington, Eagan, Chanhassen, Burnsville and St. Louis Park. Pool and Track season pass holders are 44 percent Edina residents (79 percent if Association members are included), 19 percent Minneapolis, 11 percent Richfield, 15 percent Bloomington, and 11 percent miscellaneous cities. These percentages have remained consistent for several years. The largest percentage of private rental customers comes from Minneapolis at 25 percent and then equal numbers of less than 5 percent from the surrounding metro communities. For the past several years, Edina averages one private rental customer per year. Edinborough hosts concerts in the amphitheater during the months of September through May. Concert attendance averages 1,700 people per month for our Thursday noon, Tuesday night and Sunday night concert series. Since these concerts are free, we have no residency information for these events. CENTENNIAL. FkhnborouQ LAKES PARK c I T 1 0 FF F o i N A (D 26 C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & - E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES & EDINBOROUGH PARKS Net Income: 2005 -2007 27 2007 non - operating revenue includes a lump sum payment from Pepsi for an exclusive multi -year contract. 40� ITY - r#� CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK C i T v o r t o i,, (P 41Mk, Operating Revenues: Concessions $20,131 $24,199 $43,038 Memberships 48,428 46,554 50,872 Admissions 368,739 428,958 476,103 Building Rental 219,999 222,599 245,688 Equipment Rental 54,134 52,007 78,285 Greens Fees 180,895 165,649 171,987 Class Registration & Other Fees 491,433 491,169 487,630 Total Operating Revenues 1,383,759 1,431,135 1,553,603 Operating Expenses: Cost of Goods Sold 8,964 13,584 48,215 Personnel Services 938,191 983,627 1,079,571 Contractual Services 380,634 467,512 426,043 Commodities 171,087 210,546 250,216 Central Services 82,745 88,511 83,462 Depreciation 86,247 87,672 89,461 Total Operating Expenses 1,667,868 1,851,452 1,976,968 6y k �-�,.;e s ­ (LOSS) ($284,109) (420,317) (423,365) Non - Operating R even uei(Expense) Investment Income 114,144 180,647 301,572 Other Miscellaneous Revenue 6,237 9,151 25,646 Total Non - Operating Revenue 120,381 189,798 327,218 Change in Net Assets ($163,728) ($230,519) ($96,147) 2007 non - operating revenue includes a lump sum payment from Pepsi for an exclusive multi -year contract. 40� ITY - r#� CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK C i T v o r t o i,, (P CENTENNIAL LAKES & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES & EDINBOROUGH PARKS Historical Analysis of Subsidies 1998 $220,000 General Fund 1999 206,000 General Fund 2000 108,000 General Fund 2001 46,000 General Fund 2001 56,300 Construction Fund 2002 54,343 Construction Fund 2003 277,201 Construction Fund 2004 98,000 Construction Fund 2005 0 2006 0 2007 0 Note: Subsidy amount is based on cash position of fund, not performance. I CENTENNIAL &fir �'x 1]Ji Pa� LAKES PARK c i i— r —�0 Fr E o— 1 N e CENTENNIAL LAKES & E D I N B O R 0 U G H P A R K S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES & EDINBOROUGH PARKS TRUST Year Balance 1998 $4,487,004 1999 $4,719,428 2000 $4,631,588 2001 $4,645,867 2002 $4,645,867 2003 $4,717,721 2004 $4,658,390 2005 $4,525,304 2006 $4,371,402 2007 $4,156,959 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK c... o r F D I N A F� COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT BUSINESS PLAN �0 08 U p d a � e �n �o m3 J� z C) z vF) mD T-1 D z 3 N m 90 z COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING Do D E P A R T M E N T Communications & Marketing Department Summary While communications has always been an integral part of local government, the City of Edina's Communications & Marketing Department was formally established in 2006. The department consists of a full -time Communications & Marketing Director, full -time Communications Coordinator, full -time Cable Coordinator, part- time Communications Intern and eight part-time Cable Production Assistants. It's the job of the Communications & Marketing Department to help other City departments and facilities identify what information and messages need to be conveyed to Edina's diverse audiences and make sure that this is done in the most effective manner possible. It is also the department's responsibility to find opportunities to promote what makes Edina the great community that it is and the successes of City government. In addition to media and public relations, the Communications & Marketing Department is responsible for publication of the City's internal and external newsletters and magazines, maintaining the website, administering Edina Community Channel 16 ( EDINA 16), and marketing the City and its enterprise facilities through customer analysis and advertising. Newsletters and magazines currently published include About Town, City Slick, Council Connection and Park & Recreation Insider. The City's website, www.CityofEdina.com, supports 11 distinct sub - sites, including those for enterprise facilities and the Police and Fire departments. In addition, maintenance is provided for web pages created for the Edina Historical Society and July 4 Parade. Programming on EDINA 16 currently includes a video bulletin board, meetings of the City Council, Park Board, Planning Commission and Transportation Commission; a monthly half -hour talk show, "In Edina;" a monthly news program summarizing the activities of the City Council and its boards and commissions, "Agenda: Edina;" public service announcements; and coverage of special events and community forums. In addition, all programming is streamed over the internet. COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT 30 C O M M U N I C A T I O N S & M A R K E T I N G �o D E P A R T M E N T The Communications & Marketing Department is funded by cable franchise fees, investment income and advertising sales. The General Fund does not currently support any projects of the Communications & Marketing Department. Business Strategy Update Over the past several years, the Communications & Marketing Department has witnessed a significant shift in the way residents and businesses prefer to receive their communication from the government. More and more people prefer to receive information f electronically, via the website or e -mail in particular. A decade ago, the only way to learn about what happened at a City Council meeting was to a w attend the meeting, read about part of it in the following week's issue of the Sun - Current or wait until meeting minutes were approved. Now, in addition to those things, the City Council has its own newsletter, meetings are broadcast on cable and streamed over the internet, and people who have signed up for a free "City Extra" e -mail subscription receive regular updates. As information technology advances, so must the way the City delivers information to its residents and businesses. Edina must continually examine communication tools in order to reach the broadest portion of the constituent audience. EDINA 16 was established in 2004, in conjunction with the construction of City Hall. Broadcasting meetings of City Council and some advisory boards and commissions has made the government process even more transparent and there is high viewership on the government- access channel. High viewership has led to increased demands for programming both of meetings and community events. Print media is becoming less of a norm. AboutBusiness, a publication for Edina's business community, was discontinued in the fall of 2007. Fewer copies of the City's employee newsletter, City Slick, are printed. The publication is distributed via email with a limited number of printed copies made available for those who prefer to read it on paper. During most legislative sessions, there is a lobbying effort to reduce or eliminate cable franchise fees. Such elimination would threaten all projects of the Communications & Marketing Department. That threat, coupled with increasing expenses for current projects, suggests the City might want to consider alternative funding for the department. . I COMMUNICATIONS & 31 MARKETING DEPARTMENT C O M M U N I C A T I O N S & M A R K E T I N G D E P A R T M E N T Capital Improvements In 2009, all broadcasts in the United States will be digital. As technology continues to evolve, there will be increasing pressure to broadcast EDINA 16 programming in high definition. While the cameras currently used for meeting production in the Council Chambers are high- definition cameras, additional equipment is necessary to broadcast programs in high definition. Additionally, cameras currently used in the field are not high - definition cameras and will need to be replaced. Such a conversion will cost tens of thousands of dollars. If EDINA 16 continues to grow as a community television channel, it will also be necessary to have a mobile production truck and /or studio at some point in the future. Another adjacent municipality might be interested in a partnership for such equipment. Also, a new broadcast studio at Edina High School dedicated to the late David Bloom recently opened. Staff will explore a partnership with Edina Public Schools as well. oo COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT 32 C O M M U N I C A T I O N S D E P A R T M E N T & M A R K E T I N G FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT Net Income: 2005 -2007 Revenues: W al Franchise Fees $457,421 $499,206 $570,871 Investment Income 15,076 25,153 43,659 Other 54,246 43,866 66,073 Total Revenues 526,743 568,225 680,603 Fvnencnc• Personnel Services 111,625 181,323 239,736 Contractual Services 373,461 335,906 363,490 Commodities 48,316 39,796 33,188 Central Services 30,111 34,983 31,790 Capital Outlay 13,661 24,892 7,220 Total Expenses 577,174 616,900 675,424 Change in Fund Balant,�- ($50,431) ($48,675) $5, i79 i COMMUNICATIONS & 33 MARKETING DEPARTMENT C O M M U N I C A T I O N S & M A R K E T I N G D E P A R T M E N T FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT TRUST Year Balance 1998 $953,417 1999 $934,892 2000 $1,049,987 2001 $1,126,558 2002 $1,246,638 2003 $594,735 2004 $615,088 2005 $630,264 2006 $621,089 2007 $635,023 COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT +� f f V BUSINESS PLAN nn 000 U p d 6 a=)) m v z a n n m z m E D I N A A R T C E N T E R Edina Art Center Summary The Edina Art Center, located at 4701 W. 64th St., provides the community with a place to enjoy art and a chance to learn how to create it. The Art Center has one full -time Director, six part- time office staff, a full -time Program and Gallery Coordinator, a part-time Media Studios Manager (since 1998), approximately 35 instructors and more than 40 volunteers. Volunteers come in on a daily basis and do everything from filing to cleaning to fundraising. The part-time staff consists of a bookkeeper, office manager, pottery studio manager, clay/ facilities maintenance, workshop coordinator, schedule editor, event coordinator, publicity coordinator, and general registration and membership data entry. The Edina Art Center offers classes and workshops for all ages and abilities, beginning at birth when young children attend with their parents to the professional artist who is still learning and growing through excellent faculty members. Although the Art Center's emphasis is on fine arts, several classes in the craft area are offered, such as papermaking, jewelry, tie -dye and painting on wearable arts. Watercolor is one of the Art Center's most popular media. Classes are also offered in portraiture, realistic painting and drawing, pastels, acrylics, landscapes, life drawing, porcelain painting, oils, pottery, design, bookmaking, sculpture, mask - making, architecture and more. Art for All Ages workshops were started 20 years ago. In Art for All Ages, children are placed in workshops with adults. Using the one -room schoolhouse type of learning, these workshops have been some of the Art Center's most popular offerings. We have had classes where grandparents have come in with their grandchildren. The Art Center anticipates a growth in parent/child workshops, as parents continue to realize that they want quality activities with their children. C %s IN 35 E D I N A A R T C E N T E R 36 In 2001, when "No Child Left Behind" began, the Center on Education Policy found that art classes in public schools decreased by nearly half. This increased the importance of continuing the City's mission of making the arts accessible to children. The Art Center's number of students continues to climb at an amazing rate. In 1991, enrollment was 1,600 students per year. In 1999, this figure had increased to 6,500 and in 2006, we had more than 7,200 students! Art Center classes are small. With an emphasis on individualized, guided education, the Art Center's classes for young people are limited to eight students for the preschool and kindergarten classes and 12 for the first through 8th grade. The Edina Art Center Board of Directors consists of 11 members appointed by the Edina City Council. They work in an advisory capacity to the City Council. The Board's duties are to make recommendations regarding the operation of the Edina Art Center, plan and recommend to the Council art activities and programs, develop a long -term plan directed toward fulfilling the needs and desires of Edina residents with respect to the arts, recommend programs at the Edina Art Center that are responsive to community desires, periodically report to the Council on matters pertaining to the Art Center and public art in Edina, initiate and oversee fundraising activities that benefit the Art Center and public art in Edina, represent the City at community functions pertaining to the visual arts and with similar bodies and organizations involved with the visual arts, oversee the development and implementation of a public visual arts program in Edina and perform other duties from time to time as directed by the Council. The Edina Public Art Committee is a committee under the Edina Art Center Board. The purpose of the Edina Public Art Committee is to promote the public's awareness and enjoyment of community spaces within the City via visual artistic enhancement with two- and three - dimensional pieces of art. In 2007, the Art Center Board and staff began discussing the possibility of an addition to the pottery studio and School of Realism. Such a project is currently being assessed. This addition would add an additional 3,200 square feet to the existing building. - s o� E D I N A A R T C E N T E R Memberships have steadily increased, growing from 324 members in 1986 to more than 1,100 in 2007. Membership now remains steady at about 1,100. Memberships are valid for one year from the date of purchase. Family memberships include parents and all children under 18. Benefits include invitations to openings and special events, discounts on classes of at least 10 percent, 10 percent reduction on supplies, place to meet and exchange ideas with other art enthusiasts, entry into the annual Members' Juried Show and use of Art Center studios when space is available. Scholarships are available to any students who have the need through the generosity of the Peggy Kelly Family Fund, Meredythe Anne Dasburg Foundation, Pat Van Valkenburg Children's Scholarship Fund, the Edina Community Foundation, the Golden Kiwanis, Raymond Gormley Memorial Scholarship Fund and Edina Morningside Rotary Club. The scholarship requests have grown steadily in the past few years. Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements Since 2003, very few physical changes have been made to the building. The Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios were downsized in 2004 and a full -time Atelier -type School of Realism was added in that same year. Major roof repairs were made in 2006 and 2007. The 17- year -old roof structure over Studio 14 had been holding standing water and leaking in heavy rain or snow melt. The other lower level area received an improved drainage system and a rebuilding of the kiln room roof support. Also in 2007, the Art Center began an assessment for a proposed 3,200- square -foot addition for the Pottery Department and the School of Realism. The pottery department currently serves more than 2,000 students each year in very tight quarters. This area may also include rental studios for a continuing source of revenue. There is also a pressing need for storage areas. Architectural firm ATS &R presented a Feasibility Study Summary to the Board of Directors and Building Committee. The 20 -page report included an existing site /facility study, program needs, expansion opportunities and cost estimate. oW 37 E D I N A A R T C E N T E R The preliminary cost estimate for adding an additional 4,880 square feet (this total included 1,600 square feet for the School of Realism, 1,600 square feet for the Pottery Department, 780 square feet for the Gallery and 500 square feet for the Gift Shop) is more than $2.5 million. The Art Center Board has decided to postpone the project. The Art Center must also make an investment in its technology infrastructure. Most registrations are recorded in simple spreadsheets. Some are still hand - written and filed in card files. Art Center staff, with the full support of the Communications & Marketing Department, would like to further develop the database for online class registration so that it can be used by office staff to enter in- person or mailed registrations and generate comprehensive reports. The Art Center staff would also like scheduling software for its many spaces. This project will cost an estimated $10,000 to $20,000. Marketing Membership remains steady at about 1,100. According to evaluations from students, verbal questions, and registration from forms on direct mailings, the No. 1 means of advertising is word of mouth. Schedules continue to be mailed to members and students, but such mailings have been reduced to four per year instead of five. The Art Center spends approximately $9,000 per year on paid print advertising. General ads are placed for the Media Arts Studios and workshops. Advertising is also placed to promote events such as the Carnival of the Arts, summer camps, gift sale, Tile Conference and art fairs. In addition, the Art Center sends out direct -mail pieces for special events and openings, sends flyers home with Edina Public Schools students, organizes outreach exhibits at local businesses such as usBank and Jerry's Cafe and works with the Communications & Marketing Department to issue several press releases. The Edina Art Center is a place where emerging artists can thrive. Instructors help artists perfect their work. The Gallery and Gift shop provide exposure for artists and studio space is available. The Art Center might capitalize on what is already in place and create a business incubator for artists, similar to the Business Art Center in Manitou Springs, Colo., and form a partnership I (V38 eenn �vcr cerrreR �o E D I N A A R T C E N T E R with the Edina Chamber of Commerce or a local university to offer classes, workshops and seminars on business - related topics to artists so they can market their own goods. Because current class and program offerings are based primarily on customer and student requests and because the majority of current customers and students are non - residents, market research will be completed to identify what Edina residents want at the Edina Art Center. Pricing of Services Art Center continues a gradual increase in pricing for tuition. Year Hourly Non - Member Hourly Member 1999 $4.50 $3.95 2000 $5.00 $4.50 2001 $5.25 $4.72 2002 $5.50 $4.90 2003 $5.79 $5.21 2004 $6.00 $5.40 2005 $6.60 $5.94 2006 $7.00 $6.30 2007 $7.00 $6.30 2008 $7.35 $6.61 E D I N A A R T C E N T E R The Edina Art Center's pricing remains competitive when compared to similar facilities in the metropolitan area. Name Hourly Non - Member Hourly Member Membership Edina Art Center $7.35 $6.61 $30 individual $45 family Bloomington $7.00 $6.26 $30 individual $45 household Minnetonka $8.00 $7.20 $50 single $50 household Banfill -Locke $7.87 $7.25 $21 individual $27 family $15 seniors $15 students Phipps $8.33 - 1 class No discount $25 individual $7.29 - 2 classes $25 household $6.80 - 3 classes Northern Clay $8.93 $8.18 $40 individual $65 household The Edina Art Center charges an additional $16 studio fee for pottery classes. Media Arts Studios classes are $14 for non - members and $12 for members. Edina resident members received a $5 discount on classes. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment The School of Realism was created for students who wish to study in a classical style for a period of four years concentrating on traditional techniques of painting and drawing. Using the former Media Studios area, we created six studio spaces. There are eight full -time students in the program. It has not made a huge impact on the bottom line yet shows a profit of approximately $5,00048,000 yearly. The space that is now the studio areas was formerly used as a computer- networking classroom. When used by the Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios, the space was losing several thousand a year and costing hundreds in staff hours. There was low class enrollment and technical challenges. u i�IJ' E D I N A A R T C E N T E R The Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios now offers classes and workshops in computer graphics, video editing and photography and features a fully equipped photography studio. Additionally, video /slide /photo transfer to DVD, audio dubbing, foreign conversion, audio cassette duplication and rental of equipment such as slide projectors, overhead, opaque, movie and light kits is available. With the new equipment donated by the Rotary Club of Edina and Edina Morningside Rotary Club, the Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios was able to upgrade its ability to copy 8mm and 16mm films to DVD in 2007. This continues to be a very popular service. As management predicted, the opening of the multi - million dollar Bloomington Art Center and the Minnetonka Center for the Arts may have had an impact on Art Center registration revenue. Year End 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Registration Revenue $237,308 $266,016 $312,274 $316,541 $335,550 $327,932 $318,837 $336,110 $370,116 Contractual Service $158,353 $187,868 $244,171 $232,864 $249,369 $259,187 $246,526 $250,249 $281,338 C A // % of Fees /Revenue 67% 71% 78% 74% 74% 79% 74% 75% 76% E D I N A A R T C E N T E R EDINA ART CENTER (N FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Net Income: 2005 -2007 2 42 Operating Revenues: Retail Sales $60,313 $67,146 $44,218 Concessions 3,795 4,566 1,773 Memberships 29,856 27,965 26,314 Class Registration & Other Fees 318,837 336,110 370,116 Media Studio 78,693 51,676 54,559 Total Operating Revenues 491,494 487,463 496,980 nr a� +pnn F-- -uses: Cost of Goods Sold 27,200 26,843 23,745 Personnel Services 246,526 250,249 209,616 Contractual Services 253,188 236,046 281,338 Commodities 46,373 49,295 53,111 Central Services 31,150 41,057 38,122 Depreciation 28,669 30,497 30,822 Total Operating Expenses 633,106 633,987 636,754 Operating Income /(Loss) (141,612) (146,524) (139,774) Non - Operating Revenue /(Expense) Donations 19,557 13,010 19,917 Total Non - Operating Expense 19,557 13,010 19,917 Loss t etore I ransters ($122,055) ($133,514) ($119,857) 2 42 E D I N A A R T C E N T E R EDINA ART CENTER FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Historical Analysis of Subsidies 2007 $1,575 Park Developers Fund 2007 $135,000 Edina Liquor 2006 $110,000 Edina Liquor 2006 $37,000 Construction Fund 2005 $100,000 Edina Liquor 2004 $130,000 Edina Liquor 2004 $25,000 Construction Fund 2003 $111,000 Edina Liquor 2003 $8,587 Construction Fund 2002 $114,000 Edina Liquor 2002 $15,010 Construction Fund 2001 $104,000 Edina Liquor 2001 $8,252 Construction Fund 2000 $139,000 Edina Liquor 1999 $155,000 Edina Liquor 1998 $236,000 Edina Liquor Note: Subsidy amount is based on cash position of fund, not performance. r F11 ,;»ay n BUSINESS PLAN 0000 (ogo U p d a 2e m v z n n c a n n m z m EDINA AQUATIC CENTER _ (D Edina Aquatic Center Summary Choose between a twisting body or inner tube flume; glide over the water on a high - flying cable ride; plunge from a three meter diving board; splash and play in a zero -depth children's pool; slide from a magical tree house, or relax in comfortable lounge chairs. The Edina Aquatic Center, located in Rosland Park, delivers summer fun to water - lovers of all ages. The Edina Aquatic Center offers a waterslide tower featuring a 207 -foot body slide and 300 -foot inner tube slide, with single, double and triple tubes available. Both slides are fully enclosed at the top and open one -third of the way down emptying into a separate plunge pool. Another amenity is a themed cable ride. Daring young swimmers can fly across the water on a cable ride. Riders climb aboard a 10 -foot platform built to look like a ship's bow where they will grasp a bar and glide over the pool. The ride ends with a splash into the water. The always popular children's pool features spiral and tunnel slides, a tire swing, sprays, fountains and other water -in- motion amenities. For easy entry, water depth begins at zero and increases to 18 inches. The Edina Aquatic Center also offers an Olympic -sized pool with a step -in entry, a three - meter diving board, a one -meter diving board and lap- swimming lanes. For swimmers' comfort, the water temperature in both pools is at least 84 degrees Fahrenheit. When it's time for a break, swimmers can relax in lounge chairs, take shelter under large shade umbrellas or exercise their imaginations at a themed dry playground. The focal point of the dry play area is a large tree with a climb- through center and lookout tower. The tree features two platforms with slides, as well as a bridge to a second tree. Attached to a third tree are monkey bars with a hippopotamus and alligator waiting below. The play area also features a crawl- through log, toddler slide and spider web. A full - service concessions area, located near the children's pool, offers light meals and snacks. 44 . r E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R The Edina Aquatic Center continually looks for ways to better serve patrons. From dramatic improvements such as the new water slides, the themed cable ride and dry playground to small enhancements like additional chaise lounge chairs and shade umbrellas, management tries to keep the facility safe, clean, fresh and exciting. Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements The Edina Aquatic Center has made a number of key capital improvements over the last 10 years. In 1997, the bath house, original zero -depth pool and water interactive playground were replaced. In 2002, the original waterslide was replaced and moved off the deck. In addition, a themed platform with zip -line and themed dry playground were added. In 2004, a step -in entry was added to the main pool and in 2006 a tunnel slide from the top of the tree house in the themed dry playground was constructed. In 2007, staff had planned to add a Flowrider (surfing machine), but bids came in higher than anticipated. The Flowrider or other amenity is planned for 2010 or earlier if the facility can pay for it. Marketing Retention of existing customers through early season pass incentives and convenience continues to be the priority for marketing efforts. Since 2002, guests have been able to purchase season passes online at www.EdinaAquaticCenter.com. Previous year's season ticket holders are mailed a brochure with prices in early April to trigger mail -in season ticket purchases. Now more than ever, the facility's website is a cornerstone of marketing. The website is meant to show off the amenities and demonstrate the facility's friendliness and cleanliness. Management will consider adding a "virtual tour" to the site in 2008 (similar to virtual tours on the websites of Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park and Edinborough Park), as well as a "web cam" focused on the zip line, showing off the excitement of the amenity. 1 45 �,fT Cool: E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R The Edina Aquatic Center does not place paid advertisements. Management has felt that by refreshing the facility each year and continuing to add new amenities, interest will remain strong in the operation and word of mouth will keep the Edina Aquatic Center the facility of choice. Pricing of Services Our pricing strategy recognizes the competitive nature of the aquatic center business as well as the convenience and amenities offered by our facility. Management has always priced daily admission on the high end of the industry in an attempt to steer patrons into purchasing season tickets. In 2007, daily admission ranged from a low for the Richfield Municipal Pool at $7.50 to the St. Louis Park Recreation Center at $8 to Eagan's Cascade Bay and the Edina Aquatic Center at $9. A higher daily admission rate is also a great way to gain revenue out of the large groups that come to frequent aquatic facilities, but also have a tendency to over tax the facility. Groups frequent the Edina Aquatic Center each day during the work week. Groups need to call in advance to make reservations to ensure admittance and travel from as far as Andover, Big Lake, Burnsville, Dayton and Spring Lake Park. In the aquatic industry, facilities have given a slight discount to residents when investing in the facility by purchasing a season ticket, but have never separated "resident" from "non- resident" with the daily admission fee. It is staff's recommendation to continue this practice. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment The Edina Aquatic Center currently offers a summer season in which we open the first Saturday after Edina Public Schools' school year ends and closes the fourth Sunday in August. This allows the Edina Aquatic Center time to properly hire and train the 50 to 60 part -time seasonal employees it takes to bring the facility to life each year. High school employees are not available earlier in the season, and high school and college employees are not available later in the season. Aquatic Center users continue to "shop" for the newest and most innovative recreational experience. Neighboring communities have either built new or renovated existing facilities to (B 46 E D I N A AQUATIC CENTER o o remain competitive. St. Louis Park continues to provide the stiffest competition with a brand new facility in 1997 and continual improvements. Richfield and Bloomington have renovated facilities, but lack the star power of Edina, St. Louis Park or Eagan. Eagan has the nicest aquatic center, Cascade Bay, with over $7 million invested in 1999. Other competition in the last two years is the development of the state's largest Lifetime Fitness center in Chanhassen and the Waterpark of America, an indoor waterpark in Bloomington. The Edina Aquatic Center distinguishes itself from other aquatic centers in a number of ways: • Independent 100 percent zero -depth pool with interactive water playground. A particularly attractive design to families with toddlers who are looking to be segregated from the main pool. • Themed platform and zip -line. This is an amenity unique to Edina's facility. Again, aquatic center patrons continually search for new play experiences. • Themed dry playground. The dry play area is clearly superior to other facilities and offers an enhanced play environment. • Waterslide tower off the pool deck with a separate plunge pool. • Step -in -entry into the main pool so that parents can sit on the steps as their children so acclimate to the deeper water. Other competitive issues to be mindful of include: • The City of Eden Prairie continues to study ways to finance and build an aquatic center. Eden Prairie residents have historically comprised a significant portion of Edina season pass and daily admission patrons. • The City of St. Louis Park is looking to add a significant new amenity, either a separate wading pool with large interactive play structure or a surfing pool. • The Edina Aquatic Center is disadvantaged by its relatively small size (compared with other metro facilities) and the inability to expand in its present location. I 47 �= r�, E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R Customer Analysis Types of Season Pass: Resident Individual 167 372 438 Resident Family 1921 1681 1806 Non - Resident Individual 120 160 192 Non - Resident Family 1139 918 903 Total Passes 3347 3131 3339 Total Number of Names 11,896 10,180 10,568 Resident Revenue Non - Resident Revenue $296,025.00 (60%) $198,500.00 (40 %) $289,210.00 (63 %) $172,005.00 (37%) $334,320.00 (65 %) $180,350.00 (35%) In 2004, the Edina Aquatic Center experienced the coldest and wettest summer on record with 65 days below the average temperature and only one day of 90 degrees or better. In 2005, those that had purchased 2004 season tickets and rarely used them because of the unseasonably cold weather probably thought twice before reinvesting in 2005. That being said, the Edina Aquatic Center saw a high in ticket sales back in 1999 with 4,064 tickets and more than 16,000 names on those tickets. In recent years, the Edina Aquatic Center has settled in at roughly 3,000 passes with between 10,000 and 11,000 names on them. O � T Non - Resident Season Tickets - Top Cities & Number 2003 2005 2007 Minneapolis - 607 Minneapolis - 517 Minneapolis - 523 Eden Prairie - 168 Eden Prairie - 148 Eden Prairie - 157 Richfield - 133 Richfield - 109 Bloomington - 100 Bloomington - 120 Bloomington - 98 Richfield - 85 Chanhassen - 41 St. Louis Park - 34 St. Louis Park - 42 Minnetonka - 30 Hopkins - 27 Hopkins - 31 St. Louis Park - 29 Minnetonka - 24 Minnetonka - 24 St. Paul - 16 Chanhassen - 18 St. Paul - 22 Hopkins - 14 St. Paul - 13 Chanhassen - 13 36 other cities 35 other cities 36 other cities In 2004, the Edina Aquatic Center experienced the coldest and wettest summer on record with 65 days below the average temperature and only one day of 90 degrees or better. In 2005, those that had purchased 2004 season tickets and rarely used them because of the unseasonably cold weather probably thought twice before reinvesting in 2005. That being said, the Edina Aquatic Center saw a high in ticket sales back in 1999 with 4,064 tickets and more than 16,000 names on those tickets. In recent years, the Edina Aquatic Center has settled in at roughly 3,000 passes with between 10,000 and 11,000 names on them. O � T E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R In an attempt to reach out to the missing demographic of children ages 12 through 18, staff recommends the addition of a Flowrider. This amenity would greatly appeal to the teenagers who all too early seem to outgrow the facility. In addition to attracting the teenage patron, it would be a great entertainment site and we would plan seating to accommodate those of all ages who would like to watch bathers perfect west coast surfing skills. This would be a revenue source as a separate fee would be charged to use the amenity. One other event worthy of note is the annual Splash Jam for middle schoolers. The Edina Aquatic Center tries to offer the event after hours the last Friday of the season as a way to end the summer. In previous years, a DJ has been on hand and contests held on the zip -line, three -meter diving board and waterslide tower. \NP AQU, p � T s�^ E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R - FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EDINA AQUATIC CENTER Net Income: 2005 -2007 Operating Revenues: Retail Sales $3,857 $4,173 $1,812 Concessions 115,716 113,066 118,227 Memberships 416,166 449,957 454,709 Admissions 290,570 278,150 269,450 Building Rental 22,878 22,280 20,355 Other Fees 193 54 Total Operating Revenues 849,380 867,626 864,607 Oneratina Exnenses: Cost of Goods Sold 31,591 32,477 28,702 Personnel Services 277,517 270,889 256,413 Contractual Services 80,019 120,804 121,238 Commodities 71,713 98,375 102,604 Central Services 24,894 30,009 27,970 Depreciation 185,814 192,284 197,502 Total Operating Expenses 671,548 744,838 734,430 Operating Income /(Loss) 177,832 122,788 130,177 Non - Operating Revs -* /(Expense) Interest and Fiscal Charges (53,283) (49,671) (45,446) Amortization (1,105) (1,105) (1,105) Miscellaneous 4,226 Total Non - Operating 'Expense) (54,388) (50,776) (42,325) in Net Assets $123,444 $72,012 $87,852 2007 non - operating revenue includes a lump sum payment from Pepsi for an exclusive multi -year contract. o� 50 E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R EDINA AQUATIC CENTER FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Future Debt Payments 2008 115,000 43,221 158,221 2009 120,000 38,648 158,648 2010 120,000 33,846 153,846 2011 125,000 28,854 153,854 2012 130,000 23,564 153,564 2013 135,000 17,944 152,944 2014 80,000 13,332 93,332 2015 80,000 9,833 89,833 2016 85,000 6,119 91,119 2017 90,000 2,092 92,092 Total $1,080,000 $217,453 $1,297,453 \�P I - ✓. EDINA LIQUOR BUSINESS PLAN U p d 2000 on � e m v z n r A C O m E D I NA L I Q U O R Edina Liquor Summary The City operates three Edina Liquor stores. The 50th & France store is located at 3943 W. 50th St. The Grandview store is located at 5013 Vernon Ave. The Southdale store is located at 6755 York Ave. S. Stores are strategically located near supermarkets. Combined, the three Edina Liquor locations generate nearly $1 million a year in net income. This money is used to subsidize many of the City's public amenities, including Braemar Arena and the Edina Art Center, and pay for some capital expenditures such as a new fire truck and soccer field renovation. Edina Liquor continues to be one of the top - performing municipal operations in Minnesota. Edina Liquor has ranked in the top three Minnesota municipal operations for net profit for each of the past eight years. Wine sales continue to be Edina Liquor's highest sales category, representing 43 percent of total sales. The Southdale store is the largest grossing store for a municipal operation in Minnesota. Competition for the surrounding area continues to affect yearly profits. Proposed "Wine in Grocery" legislation will continue to be at the forefront for the foreseeable future. In late 2007, the Communications & Marketing Department completed a survey of 265 Edina Liquor customers. Seventy -nine percent of those shoppers live within three miles of their preferred Edina Liquor location. Common comments on the survey were, "proximity," "close to home" and "I drive by on my way to work." According to the survey results, 75 percent of customers shop at Edina Liquor for its convenience or location; 7 percent, friendly staff; 7 percent, coupons; 6 percent, prices; and 5 percent, selection. Like all City departments and facilities, Edina Liquor prides itself in providing exceptional customer service. The survey showed that in the eyes of existing customers, Edina Liquor is doing very well in all areas. A. E D I N A L I Q U 0 R N1:1 52 E D I NA L I Q U O R Ii I • 77 percent of those surveyed ranked store friendliness and courteousness as "excellent" • 68 percent of those surveyed ranked Edina Liquor's prices as "excellent" • 68 percent of those surveyed ranked employees' accuracy as "excellent" • 66 percent of those surveyed ranked interior store cleanliness as "excellent" • 64 percent of those surveyed ranked exterior store cleanliness as "excellent" • 54 percent of those surveyed ranked Edina Liquor's carry-out service as "excellent" 57 percent of those surveyed ranked employees' product knowledge as "excellent" • 56 percent of those surveyed ranked Edina Liquor's product organization as "excellent" • 52 percent of those surveyed ranked Edina Liquor's product selection as "excellent" Edina Liquor continues to educate the public about its place as a municipal operation and its extensive product selection. Marketing and advertising have been centered on those themes. Wine tastings are held nearly every weekend and special events with distributors held at various times throughout the year. A bi- monthly newsletter, Edina Liquor Uncorked, has been produced since 2006. Business Strategy- Update Capital Improvements I - At the Southdale store on York Avenue, the existing loading dock which is open to the elements should be replaced with a new enclosed loading dock. This will save energy costs and labor costs immediately. The store counter tops, which are original, should also be replaced. The 50th & France store was last remodeled in 1998. Management would like to update the store with better lighting and new shelving on the north wall, eliminating the dark wood tones, replace carpet and add tile in front of the beer cooler. Future projects under consideration would be a complete redesign of the interior layout of the 12- year -old Southdale store. A renovation will not be planned for another three or four years. Currently, there are no plans for any capital improvements to the Grandview store on Vernon Avenue. Marketing Edina Liquor is an active member of the Edina Chamber of Commerce and the 50th & France Business & Professional Association. Edina Liquor is a sponsor of the Chamber's annual Emerald Gala and a partner in the Taste of Edina. The Taste of Edina has grown each year and gives Edina Liquor a chance to show the community and customers some of the products available. A. EDINAMVLIQU0R E D I N A L I Q U O R The City first produced Edina Liquor Uncorked in the summer of 2006 as a means to better educate customers and potential customers on Edina Liquor's extensive selection and excellent customer service. Since the liquor store business is very competitive with seemingly endless options available to customers, Edina Liquor needed a way to stand out among private liquor retailers and prove that they have much more to offer than the average liquor store. Such newsletters are often produced by high -end private retailers or "wine clubs." Edina Liquor distinguishes itself from other "munis" by publishing Edina Liquor Uncorked. Edina Liquor Uncorked is a tool used to attract more business to Edina Liquor which, in turn, helps ensure that the City is able to maintain many of its other facilities. As an example, if through the newsletter people become aware that Edina Liquor offers a wide variety of great wines complemented by a helpful and knowledgeable staff, they will be more likely to choose Edina Liquor over places like Haskell's or Surdyck's, which are both known for their extensive wine selections. The newsletter is also meant to educate customers on processes used to make wine, liquor and beer; appropriate food pairings; and other news related to the industry. \L.xrcrtu as W Ymrs of jp�rkhng T"', RM Edina Liquor Uncorked is distributed to 370 individuals who have signed up to be on a mailing list. Another 1,500 copies are distributed every two months in all three stores. The newsletter is also available online at www.EdinaLiquor.com. It is in HTML format as opposed to PDF, meaning that all content is searchable. Edina Liquor customers are tech - savvy. A kiosk was installed at the Southdale store several years ago to help customers choose wine. It is coupled with an online application, allowing customers to order wine to pick up from one of the three stores. Development is still under way, as management feels there is still great potential in this area. (M Y'- EDINAIFLIQUOR 54 E D I NA L I Q U O R Edina Liquor will look for opportunities to work with the Westin Galleria, as the development has great potential to increase business at the Southdale store. Edina Liquor will continue to advertise in a variety of different medias. The most successful advertising to date has been a direct mail piece from Dollars & Sense. Customers continually ask staff when the next coupon is coming out. Other advertisers we will be working with in include Metro Magazine, City Pages, Edina Magazine, Edina Community Education, Edina Sun - Current, Comcast Cable TV, Dex and Verizon phone directories. Pricing of Services Edina Liquor will continue to work to be as competitive as in previous years. Management has adjusted the pricing strategy over the past few years and feels the store competes well with surrounding competition. While price is important, service and selection are also keys to a positive shopping experience. One area in which Edina Liquor has been more aggressive is its liquor -, beer- and wine -of -the month program. The wine has been the biggest part of this program with sales of 350 to 500 cases sold per month. Edina Liquor will continue to work hard in providing customers the best price and selection with this promotion. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment Edina Liquor continues to be one of the most profitable municipal liquor operations in the state. Even though Edina Liquor has no geographical competition within the city limits, we are constantly in competition with stores that border our city limits. Competitors include Richfield Liquor, Eden Prairie Liquor, Trader Joe's, France 44 Liquor, South Lyndale Liquor, Sam's Club, Costco, Cost Plus World Market. Many of these stores will price advertise at some point during the year. This allows consumers to compare prices from home. It is Edina Liquor's intention to be as competitive as possible while still working within our pricing framework. Customers have become more educated about wine, liquor and beer. They tend to consume better quality (higher - priced) products, but are buying them less frequently. Staff has seen a trend in our younger customers (21 to 30) buying top -shelf products and not blink an eye at the cost. The closure of Target for most of 2007 adversely effected sales the Southdale store. Since Target reopened in October 2007, sales have increased and customer counts are showing increases over the previous year. A. 55 E D I N A 'LIQUOR o� E D I NA L I Q U O R Legislation was passed in 2006 allowing liquor stores in Hennepin County to stay open until 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Currently, Minneapolis and Bloomington are the only bordering cities to change to 10 p.m. Edina has the local option to change to the later closing time. Over the past few years, there have been significant changes in product sales. Vodka, Tequila and Irish Whiskey have shown big gains in liquor sales. On the beer side, craft beers and imports are keeping beer sales afloat. Nationally, beer sales are flat or declining. On the wine side, sales are strong and staff sees no reason for that to change. Edina Liquor's biggest growth area is in the $8 to $15 range. Australian wines have peaked, but wines from Spain, Argentina, Italy and South Africa have picked up the slack. As in years past, the City's biggest competitive threat to Edina Liquor continues to be proposed "Wine with Dinner" legislation to allow wine sales in grocery stores. This legislation has been defeated the last seven years. The City will continue to oppose this legislation and will actively work with Minnesota Municipal Beverage Association and its lobbyist in this fight. ✓s •M* EDINANT'LIQUOR E D I NA L I Q U O R EDINA LIQUOR FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Net Income: 2005 -2007 Operating Expenses Cost of Goods Sold 7,918,705 Salaries 1,167,182 Operating Revenues 341,203 Commodities 68,328 Liquor $3,103,869 $3,164,081 $3,218,278 Wine 4,603,338 474,993 5,036,845 Beer 2,789,734 2,803,469 2,924,650 Miscellaneous 255,783 251,948 256,402 Total Sales 10,752,724 11,014,491 11,436,175 Operating Expenses Cost of Goods Sold 7,918,705 Salaries 1,167,182 Contractual Services 341,203 Commodities 68,328 Depreciation 179,996 Central Services 73,899 Total Operating Expenses 9,749,313 Operating Income 1,003,411 Non - operating Revenue (Expense) Income Before Transfers $1,003,411 8,111,021 1,188,028 355,934 63,039 169,262 73,087 9,960,371 1,054,120 F ZF7 Al. E D I N A L I Q U 0 R 8,415,718 1,240,553 400,792 53,838 177,902 73,195 10,361,998 1,074,177 $1,074,177 11 A E D I NA L I Q U O R 0-1 - EDINA LIQUOR ill Al. is o� FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Operating By Store: 2005 -2007 50th & France Store (No. 1) 1 Operating Revenues $2,012,825 $2,053,096 $2,131,188 Operating Expenses (1,940,835) (1,918,449) (2,039,809) Operating Income $71,990 $134,647 $91,379 5outhdaie Store (No. 2) Operating Revenues $4,897,770 $5,021,902 $5,042,299 Operating Expenses (4,356,396) (4,471,144) (4,479,266) Operating Income $541,374 $550,758 $563,033 (IrnnrlviQw Stnro (No, ? Operating Revenues $3,842,129 $3,939,493 $4,262,688 Operating Expenses (3,452,082) (3,570,778) (3,842,923) Operating Income $390,047 ,368,715 $419,765 EDINA - LIQUOR � E D I NA L I Q U O R FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EDINA LIQUOR Historical Analysis of Liquor Transfers Year Amount Recipient 2007 $721,200 General Fund 2007 125,000 Construction Fund 2007 135,000 Edina Art Center 2007 80,000 Braemar Arena Total 2006 2006 2006 2006 Total 2005 2005 2005 Total 2004 2004 2004 Total 2003 2003 Total 2002 2002 Total $1,061,200 700,230 100,000 110,000 85,000 $995,230 786,500 100,000 41,000 $927,500 766,500 130,000 103,000 $999,500 784,000 111,000 $895,000 625,000 114,000 $739,000 General Fund Construction Fund Edina Art Center Braemar Arena Construction Fund Edina Art Center Braemar Arena Construction Fund Edina Art Center Braemar Arena Construction Fund Edina Art Center Construction Fund Edina Art Center As E D I N A *'LIQUOR 01 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK BRAEMAR ARENA Finance Department 952 - 826 -0366 oil am' O COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING DEPARTMENT AQ�9�i C� i >lo N E �e rn v � I�coRPORE`�E9 www.CityofEdina.com ;;villa, A. EDINAr 'LIQUOR Communications & Marketing Department 952 - 826 -0359 P