Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-07-07_COUNCIL MEETINGt .v BUDGET, WORD SESSION July 7, 2009 5:00 PM 1. 2008 Results 2. 2009 Year End Forecasts 3. 2010 Levy Limit 4. 2010 Non Tax Revenues Investment earnings Licenses and Permits Fines Franchise Fee /Street Light Utility 5. 2010 Expenditure Issues Personnel Costs Equipment CIP 6. Budget Calendar t General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the year ended December 31, 2008 Revenues: Taxes (1) Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for service Fines and forfeitures Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: General government Public safety Public works Parks Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (out) Liquor fund Construction fund Sale of capital assets Total other financing sources Final Budget $ 20,241,404 2,715,050 745,000 2,637,388 925,000 598,000 27,861,842 4,254, 566 14,097,930 6,400,246 3,851,900 28,604,642 (742,800) 742,800 (450, 000) 50,000 342,800 2008 Actual $ 19,983,295 2,885,781 825,049 3,039,841 968,893 533,419 28,236,278 4,008,170 14,214,025 6,470,700 3;660,862 28,353,757 (117,479) 742,800 (450,000) 96,825 389,625 Over/ (Under) $ (258,109) 170,731 80,049 402,453 43,893 (64,581) 374,436 (246,396) 116,095 70,454 (191,038) (250,885) 625,K1 46,825 46,825 Net increase (decrease) in fund balance $ (400,000) $ 272,146 $ 672,146 City of Edina General Fund G:\ Audit \Workpapers 2008 \Reserves \RESERVES 2008.xls ER 7/7/2009 12:52 PM Fund Balance Reserved and Unreserved. Designated FUND BALANCE RESERVED 12/3112007 ADJUSTMENTS. 42131/2008 3615 Reserve for Prepaid Insurance ; $ 28,637.00 $ (14,655.50) $ 13,981,.50 28,637.00 (14,655.50) ; 13,981.50 UNRESERVED: DESIGNATED 3851 Dedicated Funds - Parkland 178,295.00 - 178,295:00 3855 Designated for unrealized inv gains /losses 63,757.37 (52,372.20) 11;385.17. 3856 Designated for Equipment Replacement 2,523,218.71 81,091.01 2,604,309.72 3857 Designated for CompensatedAbsences 1,305,005.00 99,479.00. 1,404,484.00 • -'3860 Designated for Gen_ eral.Fund Cash Flow 9,108,632.00 365,079.00 9,473;711.00. 3875 Undesignated 899,311.92 (206,475:31) 692,836.61 14,078,220.00 286,801.`50 14,365,021.50 TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 14,106,857.00 $ 272;146.00 $ 14,379,003.00 G:\ Audit \Workpapers 2008 \Reserves \RESERVES 2008.xls ER 7/7/2009 12:52 PM General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Estimated Estimated For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 (1) Revenues: Taxes (2) Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for service Fines and forfeitures Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: .General government (3) Public safety Public works (4) Parks Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures 2009 2008 Over/ Increase/ Budget Estimate (Under) Actual (Decrease) $ 21,052,691 $ 20,341,600 $ (711,091) $ 19,983,295 $ 358,305 2,797,715 2,100,000 (697,715) 2,885,781 (785,781) 757,000 757,000 - 825,049 (68,049) 2,701,480 2,858,000 156,520 3,039,841 (181,841) 900,000 1,146,000 246,000 968,893 177,107 653,972 401,000 (252,972) 533,419 (132,419) 28,862,858 27,603,600 (1,259,258) 28,236,278 (632,678) in fund balance $ -. $ (673,300) $ (673,300 $ 272,146 4,498,511 4,128,000 (370,511) 4,008,170 119,830 14,648,719 14,561,000 (87,719) 14,214,025 346,975 6,524,694 6,483,000 (41,694) 6,470,7D0 12,300 3,961,034 3,875,000 (86,034) 3,660,862 214,138 29,632,958 29,047,000 (585,958) 28,353,757 693,243 (770,100) (1,443,400) (673,300) (117,479) (1,325,921) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (out) Liquor fund 765,100 765,100 - 742,800 22,300 Construction fund (50,000) (50,000) - (450,000) 400,000 Sale of capital assets 55,000 55,000 - 96,825 (41,825) Total other financing sources 770,100 770,100 - 389,625 380,475 Net Increase (decrease) in fund balance $ -. $ (673,300) $ (673,300 $ 272,146 $ (945,446) 1 This is a forward- looking statement. Figures represent preliminary estimates and include many assumption: 2 Tax collections assumed to be 97 %. 3 General government expenditures include contingencies and severance expenditures, which are down through the first six months of 2009. 4 Public works expenditures are lower in 2009 due to equipment that was financed with certificates. Franchise Fees and Street Light Utility- -City data 7/7/2009 CSC Brooklyn Center Burnsville Champlin Crystal Delano Grand Marais Lakeville Lindstrom Lino Lakes Luverne Mound Moundsview New Ulm Oakdale Plymouth Ramsey Richfield Robbinsdale Rochester Savage Shoreview St. Michael Stillwater Franchise Fee Amount Yes ROW only No Streetlight Utili Amount Yes Yes Yes $2.50 per month each No Yes Yes 5% of gross revenues —gas; $.00317 per kW /H electricity sold No Yes Electric, $40,000 annually; plus 1 % No No Yes Yes No Yes Only on one provider No Yes Yes Yes $2.00 per month each Yes Yes 3.75% Yes Yes 5% PILOT (utilities are city- owned) No No yes No Yes No Had one, but let it sunset last year Yes Yes No Yes 4% gas /4% electric No Yes PILOT (utility is city- owned) No No Yes No Yes Yes $2.50 /month (electric only) Yes Yes $4.00 /quarter SF $6.75 /quarter $2.00 /month $2.50 /month SF $3.25 /quarter SF $10.00 1quarter Only billed to developments with streetlights In process of reinstituting it this year May be considering incorporation of streetlight fees into electric rates Implemented to make up for loss of MVHC in 2003 I_I III: \_, I III 11:1 ' /I ►l lll Is �l II 'LEAGU E of MINNESOTA CITIES 59, Tom C3rundkoefer N. , Alternative Revenues -Beyond :B ad 'and Butter Introduction With intergovernmental aid flat or declining .anddevy limits a resurrected blight on the municipal soul, what's a cash - strapped city to do? While reducing expenses and having efficient city operations are always important, this memorandum will focus on alternative ways for cities to increase the revenue side of the budget equation. City revenues generally fall into one of three main categories:. Taxes Assessments Fees and charges This paper will look at ways that cities can enhance the revenue producing potential in each of these broad categories. Taxes General property tax levies Political and legal considerations often place limits on the ability of cities to raise revenue through general property tax levies. Beginning with taxes payable in 2009, cities with populations of over 2500 are subject to three years of imposed levy limits. The levy limit allows for up to a 3.9% increase in local property tax levy. Each city's previous year levy plus local government aid, form the base for computing the 3.9% allowable increase. The limit also permits a .5% increase if a city experiences an increase in households and an additional .5% increase if a city experiences an increase in commercial /industrial property. A city may also exceed its, levy limit by an amount approved by the majority of those voting on the question at a general or spcial election. Special levies State law allows a variety of special levies to meet specified city needs. Permitted special levies include: A levy to cover the costs incurred for securing, maintaining, or demolishing - foreclosed or abandoned residential properties as allowed by the Department of Revenue. A city must have either a foreclosure rate of at least 1.4 %of households in 2007 or a foreclosure rate . in 2007 in the city or in a zip code area of the city that.is at least 50% higher than the average foreclosure rate in the metropolitan area to use this special levy. - A levy to pay costs attributable to wages and benefits for sheriff, police, and fire personnel. (If a city did not include this special. levy in the previous year's levy limit League of Minnesota Cities, October 2008 base, reduce that base number by the amount equal to the previous year's levy for these costs, thus allowing a slightly higher levy.) These payments include contributions to police and fire pensions that are not made through the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). Other special levies as identified in Minn. Stat. § 275.70. Other levy authority Local lodging tax A city may pass an ordinance to impose up to a 3% tax on the gross receipts of lodging at a hotel, motel, rooming house, tourist court, resort, or city campground. The law requires that 95% of the gross proceeds from the tax be used to fund a local convention or tourism bureau for marketing and promoting the city. (Minn. Stat. § 469.190). Gambling tax Cities may impose up to a 3% local gambling tax on licensed gambling organizations in order to cover the cost of regulating lawful gambling. A city may not use these tax revenues for any other purpose. This tax may not be imposed if the city charges a local investigation fee. In addition, a city may require organizations conducting lawful gambling to contribute 10% of their net profits derived from lawful gambling to a city - administered fund to be disbursed for lawful purposes. Such funds cannot be used for the benefit of a pension or retirement fund. (Minn. Stat. § 349.213) Special district taxing authority The legislature has authorized the establishment of several different special taxing districts, including: - Storm sewer improvement districts — Minn. Stat. § 444.16 - Sidewalk improvement districts — Minn. Stat. § 435.44 - Urban and rural service districts — Minn. Stat. § 272.67 - Special service districts — Minn. Stat. § 428.02 - Housing improvement districts — Minn. Stat. § 428A.13 - Fire service districts — Minn. Stat. § 368.85 via Minn. Stat. § 415.01 Payments in lieu of taxes Some of the heaviest users of city services are churches, colleges, Indian casinos and other tax- exempt entities. These entities will often have a strong interest in seeing that city services, facilities and finances remain strong and are willing to voluntarily pay something for the services they use. Many cities have successfully negotiated payments in lieu of taxes from these entities. League of Minnesota Cities, October 2008 Assessments In addition to authority to impose property taxes, state statute also permits cities to assess individual property owners for improvements or services that uniquely benefit them. Most of that authority is found in Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. The main advantage of using Chapter 429 is that it allows for the imposition of "tax like" charges only on benefited properties; and allows a charge on properties that might otherwise be exempt from general property taxes. The most challenging aspect of Chapter 429 charges is that a city will need to be able to show that the value to the property meets or exceeds the amount of the assessment. Chapter 429 provides two unique tools for cities to recoup the amount of services or improvement provided to property owners. Local Improvements First, Minn. Stat. § 429.021 provides a list of 20 or more "local improvements" for which cities may assess property. They include costs incurred: (1) To acquire, open, and widen any street, and to improve the same by constructing, reconstructing, and maintaining sidewalks, pavement, gutters, curbs, and vehicle parking strips of any material, or by grading, graveling, oiling, or otherwise improving the same, including the beautification thereof and including storm sewers or other street drainage and connections from sewer, water, or similar mains to curb lines. (2) To acquire, develop, construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain storm and sanitary sewers and systems, including outlets, holding areas and ponds, treatment plants, pumps, lift stations, service connections, and other appurtenances of a sewer system, within and without the corporate limits. (3) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain steam heating mains. (4) To install, replace, extend, and maintain street lights and street lighting systems and special lighting systems. (5) To acquire, improve, construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain water works systems, including mains, valves, hydrants, service connections, wells, pumps, reservoirs, tanks, treatment plants, and other appurtenances of a water works system, within and without the corporate limits. (6) To acquire, improve and equip parks, open space areas, playgrounds, and recreational facilities within or without the corporate limits. . (7) To plant trees on streets and provide for their trimming, care, and removal. (8) To abate nuisances and to drain swamps, marshes, and ponds on public or private property and to fill the same. (9) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain dikes and other flood control works. (10) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain retaining walls and area walls. (1 1) To acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, alter, extend, operate, maintain, and promote a pedestrian skyway system. (12) To acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, operate, maintain, and promote underground pedestrian concourses. (13) To acquire, construct, improve, alter, extend, operate, maintain, and promote public malls, plazas or courtyards. (14) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain district heating systems. League of Minnesota Cities, October 2008 (15) To construct, reconstruct, alter, extend, operate, maintain, and promote fire protection systems in existing buildings. (16) To acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, alter, extend, and maintain highway sound barriers. (17) To improve, construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain gas and electric distribution facilities owned by a municipal gas or electric utility. (18) To purchase, install, and maintain signs, posts, and other markers for addressing, related to the operation of enhanced 911 telephone service. (19) To improve, construct, extend, and maintain facilities for Internet access and other communications purposes, if the council finds that: (i) the facilities are necessary to make available Internet access or other communications services that are not and will not be available through other providers or the private market in the reasonably foreseeable future; and (ii) the service to be provided by the facilities will not compete with service provided by private entities. (20) To assess affected property owners for all or a portion of the costs agreed to with an electric utility, telecommunications carrier, or cable system operator to bury or alter a new or existing distribution system within the public right -of -way that exceeds the utility's design and construction standards, or those set by law, tariff, or franchise. The list of permissible improvements for which cities may levy special assessment goes well beyond the traditional items such as sewer, water, curb, gutter and street repaving. Take a close list and consider whether your city might be able to levy special assessments for some of these services and improvements. Current Services The second category or services for which cities may levy assessments includes: (1) Snow, ice, or rubbish removal from sidewalks; (2) Weed elimination from streets or private property; (3) Removal or elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property; (4) Installation or repair of water service lines, street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets; (5) The trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees from any street; (6) The treatment and removal of insect infested or diseased trees on private property, the repair of sidewalks and alleys; (7) The operation of a street lighting system; (8) The operation and maintenance of a fire protection or a pedestrian skyway system; (9) Reinspections which find noncompliance after the due date for compliance with an order to correct a municipal housing maintenance code violation; (10) The recovery of any disbursements under Minn. Stat. § 50413.445. subd. 4. If a city incurs expenses with respect to any of the above, it is certainly appropriate for the city to assess those charges to the property benefited rather than have all tax - payers subsidize the services League of Minnesota Cities, October 2008 provided to the single property owner. In these times when vacant properties and foreclosures are prevalent, consider charging and assessing for city costs associated with property inspection and maintenance. Charges and fees Charges One of the easiest things a city can do to generate new revenue is to take full advantage of its assets and impose a reasonable charge for their use. Consider the assets that many cities have and think about whether your city is generating enough revenue from their use. Asset Money Investments Community room Water tower Golf course, swimming pool, etc. Sewer and water Park shelters Streets City signs and scoreboards Fees Charize Interest on checking account/maximizing return Policy that responsibly balances returns and risk Appropriate rental charges Renting to cellular operations Is charge sufficient to cover all operational costs? Do rates cover all costs? Charging for use Utility franchise fees Selling advertising Another underutilized opportunity to generate revenue requires a city to evaluate and study the true cost of city services and charge a fee that covers those costs. Often cities don't include all of their costs in arriving at fees. For example, many cities do not adequately calculate overhead charges in arriving at fees. For instance, are costs such as insurance, utility, the fair value of space, technology, employee benefits, supplies, fuel and other costs adequately captured when deciding how much to charge for city services? Similarly, often cities don't calculate police costs in calculating fees. In short, don't undervalue the true costs of city services when deciding how much direct users of those services should pay. League of Minnesota Cities, October 2008 Some examples: Service Building inspections Liquor licenses Gambling licenses Zoning fees Business licenses Fee Should cover all overhead costs Include police oversight Include costs to process Include city council costs Inspection costs A word about the expense side of the equation Obviously tight budget times call fora close evaluation of both the revenue and expense side of the budget equation. This document focuses mostly on the revenue side, but it is absolutely true that governmental units everywhere need to study ways of reducing cost and improving efficiency. Examples of city efforts aimed at reducing expenses include: - More shared services and facilities with other governmental units - Reduced hours or days of operation — city hall hours, library hours, etc. - Reduced energy consumption - Car pooling - Refinancing bonds Adopt a park or street programs Other ideas Conclusion Tough budget times call for strong, courageous and creative leadership. League of Minnesota Cities, October 2008 City Levys 20,09-2011 Important Dates: . September I, 2009: State certifies maximum levy limits September 8, 2009: Special meeting to certify 2010 preliminary levy (Certification date is September 1 5t'' —so we propose a special meeting in order to certify by that date) December 18; 2009: Final levy certification due January 15, 2010: Deadline for recertification of final levy'(if additional unallottment occurs after preliminary levy deadline)* The levy calculation: Levy limit base x 1.0086 (this is the maximum under state law; which stipulates 3.9% or the change in the implicit price deflator, (IPD) for local governments, whichever is less. o Add one -half of the percentage increase in the number of households over the last year; e Add one -half of the percentage increase in the total taxable market value for all kinds of property. e The total is the levy limit. Example: CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY LEVY LIMIT ESTIMATE Estimate $ 23,553,721 (2,351,030) 21,202,691 0.8600% 21,385,034 0.0000% 21,385,034 0.0000% 21,385,034 3,278,104 $ 24,663,138 1,109,417 4.7% 182,343 0.86% 2009 Certified total levy Less: 2009 Debt special levies Levy aid base 0.86% Increase levy limit Half of household growth Half of commercial & industrial new market value 2010 Adjusted Levy Limit Base Plus: 2010 Debt s- peciial levies Plus: 2010.0ther special levies 2010 total levy limit Total levy increase Actual -total levy increase percentage Increase in general fund levy Actual general fund levy increase percentage Special levies allowed under "state statute that Edina could use: • Levy to recover MVHC reimbursement unallotted in December 2008 ® Levy to recover MVHC reimbursement unallotted in July 2009 • Levy to recover MVHC reimbursement unallotted in December 2009* • Levy for bonds and most certificates of indebtedness ® Voter approved levy • Levy to pay for federal or state matching requirement • . Levy for property tax abatements ® Levy for increase in PERA employer contributions • Levy for increased police and firefighter wage and benefit costs Not es: • Special levies are optional. ® Once the base amount of the levy is calculated using a special levy, if the City decides not to utilize that special levy in subsequent years, the Dept. of Revenue will not restore the base. As a result, it is in the city's best interest to continue using a special levy. o Household data come from the state demographer and the. Metropolitan Council. General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Pro Forma Estimated For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 (1) Revenues: Taxes (2) Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for service Fines and forfeitures Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: General government Public safety Public works (3) Parks Other Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures 2009 2008 Over/ Increase/ Budget Actual (Under) Actual (Decrease) $ 21,052,691 $ 20,761,000 $ (291,691) $ 19,983,295 $ 777,705 2,797,715 1,900,000 (897,715) 2,885,781 (985,781) 757,000 757,000 - 825,049 (68,049) 2,701,480 2,858,000 156,520 3,039,841 (181,841) 900,000 1,146,000 246,000 968,893 177,107 653,972 401,000 (252,972) 533,419 (132,419) 28,862,858 27,823,000 (1,039,858) 28,236,278 (413,278) 4,498,511 4,128,000 (370,511) 4,008,170 119,830 14,648,719 14,561,000 (87,719) 14,214,025 346,975 6,524,694 6,433,000 (91,694) 6,470,700 (37,700) 3,961,034 3,775,000 (186,034) 3,660,862 114,138 29,632,958 28,897,000 (735,958) 28,353,757 543,243 (770,100) (1,074,000) Other financing sources (uses): 22,300 - (450,000) Transfers in (out) - 96,825 (41,825) Liquor fund 765,100 765,100 Construction fund (50,000) (50,000) Sale of capital assets 55,000 55,000 Total other financing sources 770,100 770,100 (303,900) (117,479) (956,521) - 742,800 22,300 - (450,000) 400,000 - 96,825 (41,825) - 389,625 380,475 Net increase (decrease) in fund balance $ - $ (303,900) $ (303,900) $ 272,146 1 This is a pro -forma statement. Figures represent preliminary estimates and include many assumptions. 2 Tax collections assumed to be 99 %. 3 Public works expenditures decrease year over year due to equipment that was financed with certificates. F, MEMORANDUM DATE: 7/2/2009 TO: MAYOR HOVLAND, COUNCILMEMBERS HOUSH, SWENSON, BENNETT AND BRINDLE CC: GORDON HUGHES, CITY MANAGER FROM: HEATHER WORTHINGTON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER RE: 2010 BUDGET DISCUSSION -JULY 7 WORK SESSION Enclosed, please find information pertaining to the 2010 levy limit, special levies, and our projected levy for 2010. This is background for our first discussion of the 2010 Budget next Tuesday. We would also like to schedule upcoming budget work and study sessions with the Council at this meeting, so please bring along your calendar. Please contact me if you have any questions. W `J ENC. 1 City Levys 2009 -201 Important Dates: September I, 2009: State certifies maximum levy limits September 8, 2009: Special meeting to certify 2010 preliminary levy (Certification date is September 150—so we would propose a special meeting in order to certify by that date) December 18, 2009: Final levy certification due January 15, 2010: Deadline for recertification of final levy (if additional unallottment occurs after preliminary levy deadline)* The levy calculation: Levy limit base x 1.0086 (this is the maximum under state law, which stipulates 3.9% or the change in the implicit price deflator (IPD) for local governments, whichever is less. • Add one -half of the percentage increase in the number of households over the last year; • Add one -half of the percentage increase in the total taxable market value for all kinds of property. • The total is the levy limit. Example: CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY LEVY LIMIT ESTIMATE Estimate $ 23,553,721 2009 Certified total levy (2,351,030) Less: 2009 Debt special levies 21,202,691 Levy aid base 0.8600% 0.86% Increase levy limit 21,385,034 0.0000% Half of household growth 21,385,034 0.0000% 21,385,034 3,278,104 240,494 $ 24,903,632 1,349,911 5.7% Half of commercial & industrial new market value 2010 Adjusted Levy Limit Base Plus: 2010 Debt special levies Plus: 2010 Special levy for MVHC unallotted in 2009 Plus: 2010 Other special levies 2010 total levy limit Total levy increase Actual total levy increase percentage 422,837 Increase in general fund levy 2.0% Actual general fund levy increase percentage S Special levies allowed under state statute that Edina could use: • Levy to recover MVHC reimbursement unallotted in December 2008 • Levy to recover MVHC reimbursement unallotted in July 2009 • Levy to recover MVHC reimbursement unallotted in December 2009* • Levy for bonds and most certificates of indebtedness • Voter approved levy • Levy to pay for federal or state matching requirement • Levy for property tax abatements • Levy for increase in PERA employer contributions • Levy for increased police and firefighter wage and benefit costs Notes: Special levies are optional. • Once the base amount of the levy is calculated using a special levy, if the City decides not to utilize that special levy in subsequent years, the Dept. of Revenue will not restore the base. As a result, it is in the city's best interest to continue using a special levy. • Household data come from the state demographer and the Metropolitan Council. AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of June 16, 2009 * II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated July 2, 2009, TOTAL $282.23 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 16, 2009, Work Session of June 16, 2009 and Study Session o f June 23, 2009 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During 'Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance No. 2009 -08 - Amendment to Section 850.11 Subd. 6 Accessory Buildings In R -1 District Agenda /Edina City Council July 7, 2009 Page 3 A. RECEIVE DECEMBER 31 2008 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT B. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated June 18, 2009, TOTAL $1,115,520.02; and Pre -List dated June 25, 2009 TOTAL $1,434,263.04 and Pre -List dated July 2, 2009 TOTAL: $570,628.02 and Credit Card Transactions from May 25, 2009 to June 23, 2009 TOTAL $6,840.40 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Receive Petition Requesting Drain Tile from Six Residents on Jeff Place B. Letter Received - Bill Westerdahl & Robert Lubar - Proposed Bike Trail Route C. Correspondence. VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues July 7 Work Session - Budget Discussion Tues July 7 Regular Meeting Tues July 21 Work Session - To be determined Tues July 21 Regular Meeting Tues July 28 Study Session - To be determined Mon Aug 3 Regular Meeting Tues Aug 4 NIGHT TO UNITE Tues Aug 18 Regular Meeting Tues Aug 25 Study Session - To be determined Tues Sep 1 Regular Meeting Mon Sep 7 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Sep 15 Regular Meeting Tues Sep 22 Town Hall Meeting Tues Oct 6 Regular Meeting Tues Oct 20 Regular Meeting Tues Oct 27 Study Session - To be determined 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMF 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 -8:30 P.M. CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRUM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Agenda /Edina City Council July 7, 2009 r Page 2 B. PUBLIC . HEARING.. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Interlachen Country ' Club, 6200 Interlachen Boulevard, Resolution No.- 2009 -59 C. PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance No. 2009 -09 Amendment to Section 850.13 Subd. 7, Permitting Efficiency Dwelling Units In PSD -4 III. AWARD OF BID * A. Edinborough Park Bathroom Addition - Contract No. 09 -3PK * B. Contract No. 1, Imp. No. PWA, Asbestos -& Hazardous Building Removal * C. Contract No. 2, Imp. No. PWA, Selective Demolition & Partial Structural Steel * D. Contract No. ENG 09 -3, Imp. No. BA -363, 2009 Mill & Overlay * E. Xerxes Avenue Watermain Lining Improvement No. WM-496 IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable 'vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted). A. Resolution No. 2009 -60 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) * B. Antenna Lease, 5900 Park Place, T- Mobile /City of Edina C. Resolution No. 2009 -61 Supporting Preparation Of Environmental Assessment Worksheet of Potential Regional Trail Segments * D. Student Appointment to Planning Commission - Continued to July 21, 2009 * E. Set, Hearing Date (p7/21/09)'- Preliminary Plat Approval - 5920 Oaklawn Avenue, Two Lot Subdivision V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During Community Comment, / the City Council will invite comments from those. in attendance who would like to speak about something not on tonight's agenda. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which 'a public hearing was held by the. Council within the last thirty days or a matter scheduled for future hearing on a specific date. Individuals should not r expect the Mayor or Council to respond to- their comments. Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration' at a future meeting. "" _ VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) ''g ;. >.. MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 16, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh and Chair Hovland. Absent was Commissioner Swenson. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner ;Brindle, for approval of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as' presented. Rollcall: - Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Housh Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING, OF JUNE 2. 2009, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner ;Brindle approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 2, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m. Executive Director I R55CKRi OG20000 CITY.. " NA 6/3 `15:50:49 - Council Check Register Page - .1 712/2009 —7/212009 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Buslness Unit 14026 71212009 101766 DISPLAY SALES 282.23 PROMENADE FLAGS 214710 INV0067611 . 9132.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT 282.23 282.23 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 282.23 Total Payments 282.23 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:50:50 Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/212009 - 7/212009 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 282.23 Report Totals 282.23 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing poJiclps and Procedures dates_ °7/ i 1 D 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 16, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Member Swenson. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle approving the Council Consent Agenda as submitted. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 2. 2009 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 2, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL REZONING — RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -57 AND ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A33 ADOPTED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the request of Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the 7500 York Cooperative, for Final Rezoning from Planned Residential District (PRD -4) to Planned Senior Development District (PSR -4), Final Development Plan, Variance for maximum square footage (17 dwelling units), Setback Variance from Edinborough Way (three feet), and Final Plat approval. Mr. Teague reported the recommendations for approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Commission. He indicated staff had found: the proposed use and rezoning were reasonable for this site, senior housing was compatible with nearby uses, the PSR -4 zoning district was appropriate, variances justified, and he recommended approval. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague and City Manager Hughes about the PRD -4 and PSR - 4 District standards, parking spaces, unit size, and density. The Council discussed Code language and the possible need for an amendment to the zoning ordinance or a variance to allow the proposed efficiency units. Proponent Presentation Mark Thomas, President and CEO of the Ebenezer Society and President of the Senior Services Division of Fairview Health Services, presented the Society's application, reported the membership overwhelmingly supported the project, and requested the Council's approval. Ward Isaacson, Pope Architects, presented the project under consideration to build a 76 -unit, four -story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337 -unit, nine -story senior housing development. The Council asked questions of Mr. Isaacson about the project and sustainable features. Mr. Thomas advised that Ebenezer received financing and could begin the project in September of 2009. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. Public Testimony Albert Mayer, President of 7500 York Cooperative, addressed the Council and spoke on behalf of the project. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 16, 2009 Brad Beard, 6516 Waterman Avenue, addressed the Council and spoke on behalf of the project. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to close the. public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Hovland Motion carried. Attorney Knutson advised that a Code text amendment was needed to allow efficiency apartments. He stated such an amendment could be considered by the Planning Commission on July 1, 2009, and the City Council on July 7, 2009. The Council discussed the affirmative vote taken by a high percentage of cooperative members and the need for a Code text amendment. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -57, approving a Final Development Plan with variances and Final Plat for 7500 York Avenue Cooperative subject to the following findings for the Final Development Plan: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. 2. The proposed addition is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the north, south, east, and west. 3. The proposed density is compatible with densities in the area. 4. Given the City of Edina's aging population, senior housing is a need in the City. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 6. On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Rezoning. And findings for the variances: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the location of the existing underground parking deck, which would not support the proposed addition. In addition, the proposed building location avoids the large open space and garden area along York Avenue. Therefore, the applicant is forced to develop a site plan by working around this structure and the open space. 2. The proposed four -story addition is reasonably sized given the height of the existing building and the height of buildings in the area. The density of the project allowed by City Code would be 44 units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 36 units. Therefore, the proposed building is reasonably sized and a reasonable request given the practical difficulty of having to design a building around the underground parking ramp. 3. The building layout of the area where the variance is requested was driven by the Alzheimer's floor. The rooms are very small. To take three feet off any of the rooms would not be practical given the needs within the facility, including room windows. Eliminating the variance would create obstacles and safety issues for the memory care residents. 4. The setback variance is for a minor three -foot intrusion into the required setback. 5. The requested setback variance for the building is adjacent to a parking lot to the west. 6. The majority of existing units within the existing building do not conform to the maximum standard of .850 square feet for two- bedroom units and 700 square feet for one - bedroom units. 7. It would be reasonable to allow housing units within the addition to be consistent with the existing units. 8. The intent of the maximum square footage standards was to ensure some affordable housing for the Planned Senior Residential Districts. Of the total 76 units, 59 proposed units conform to the maximum requirement (78 %). 9. The average unit size is 601 square feet, well below the maximum size requirement. 10. The Zoning Ordinance requirement for maximum unit sizes for senior housing should be reconsidered for its appropriateness by the Planning Commission and City Council. And subject to the following conditions: Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 16, 2009 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2009, • Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2009, • Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2009, • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2009, and • Building materials board_ as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. The following must be submitted to the City before a building permit is issued: a. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. b. Per Section 850.10, Subd. 3.6 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, .a letter of credit, performance bond, or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 21, 2009. 5. The design and construction of the project must be done with the sustainable initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 6. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 7. The Final Plat submitted by Seventy -Five Hundred York Cooperative, fee owner, entitled Seventy -Five Hundred York Campus, is hereby approved. And to adopt Ordinance No. 850 -A33 including waiver of second reading, rezoning 7500 York Avenue from PRD-4, Planned Residential District to PSR-4, Planned Senior Development District. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to set a public hearing for July 7, 2009, to consider an amendment to Edina Code Section 850.13 subd. 7C Planned Senior Development District (PSR) to allow for efficiency units. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — INSURANCE RENEWALS: WORKERS COMPENSATION, GENERAL LIABILITY AND PROPERTY Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for worker's compensation at $446,915.00; general liability insurance at $338,105; and property insurance at $75,966.00 to the recommended low bidder, Travelers. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT NO. ENG 09 -11 ST. JOHN'S PARK NEIGHBORHOOD STREET Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for St. John's Park neighborhood reconstruction: Contract No. ENG 09 -11 Improvement Nos. BA- 357, SS -445, STS -352 and WM-487 to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt at $1,586,586.38. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT NO. PK09 -2PK PARK PARKING LOT AND PATHWAY IMPROVEMENT MAINTENANCE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for Bredesen Park pathway, Braemar Golf Course parking lot, Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 16, 2009 Highlands Park parking lot, and Edinborough Park entryway and sidewalk renovations to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways at $319,421.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -56 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -56 accepting various donations. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Hovland Motion carried. *TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF JUNE 3, 2009, ACCEPTED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle to accept the June 3, 2009, Traffic Safety Report. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *CHOWEN PARK GARDEN CONTINUED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle to continue consideration of Chowen Park Garden to July 21, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -58 ADOPTED GRANT AGREEMENT WITH * MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -58 authorizing acceptance of a certified local government grant from the Minnesota Historical Society. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -53 ADOPTED APPROVING LOT DIVISION, 4306 GRIMES AVENUE, 4201 MORNINGSIDE ROAD Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -53 approving a Lot Division of 4201 Morningside Road and 4306 Grimes Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 4, 2009, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $99,935.39; Communications Fund $33,670.55; Police Special Revenue $2,798.85; Working Capital Fund $118,370.10; Art Center Fund $19,063.61; Aquatic Center Fund $6,815.70; Golf Course Fund $25,326.88; Ice Arena Fund $1,217.14; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $15,853.55; Liquor Fund $69,146.83; Utility Fund $59,362.17; Storm Sewer Fund $1,873.24; PSTF Agency Fund $23,014.68; TOTAL $476,448.69 and for approval of payment of claims dated June 11, 2009, and consisting of 36 pages: General Fund $115,147.03; Communications Fund $382.70; Police Special Revenue $141.79; Working Capital Fund $22,906.08; Construction Fund $1,992.14; Art Center Fund $6,292.21; Golf Dome Fund $1,417.53; Aquatic Center Fund $13,029.17; Golf Course Fund $35,585.67; Ice Arena Fund $24,906.65; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $15,920.62; Liquor Fund $275,664.85; Utility Fund $409,797.48; Storm Sewer Fund $3,406.66; PSTF Agency Fund $4,128.48; TOTAL $930,719.06; and Credit Card Transactions dated April 28 — May 25, 2009; TOTAL $6,124.73. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. PETITION DENIED — COUNTRY CLUB ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT Engineer /Public Works Director Houle presented the petition to redesign the intersection of Drexel Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 16, 2009 Avenue and Country Club Road and rationale for staff's recommendation of denial. The Council asked questions of Mr. Houle and determined the matter had been thoroughly deliberated and the public process was adequate. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to deny the petition for Country Club roadway reconstruction based on the rationale that adequate public process had taken place regarding the design and incorporation of traffic calming modifications prior to award of bids for the Country Club area sewer, water, and street reconstruction project. . Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Hovland Motion carried. *PETITION RECEIVED — REQUESTING SIDEWALK WEST FRONTAGE ROAD, BENTON AVENUE TO VALLEY VIEW ROAD Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Brindle to receive the petition requesting sidewalk along West TH100 frontage road from Benton Avenue to Valley View Road and refer it to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:23 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 7, 2009. James C. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 16, 2009, meeting available. Page 5 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA ENERGY &`ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL_ JUNE 16, 2009 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:20 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering _rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Brindle and Mayor Hovland. Absent was Member Swenson. Edina Energy & Environment Commissioners present were: Commissioners Christianson, Hanson, lyer, O'Connell, Paterlini, Risser, Sierks and Thompson. Absent were Commissioners Latham and Lee. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, ,Assistant,City Manager ;` Ceil- Smith, Assistant to the City Manager and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the meeting was an opportunity to explore issues of mutual concern between the Commission and the Council: Reports were received from each of the four working groups: Water Quality, Recycling /Solid Waste, Education & Outreach and Climate ,Ch na gg. Chair lyer reviewed the Commission's goals and key accomplishments for the last six to twelve months. Commissioners indicated a desire to be part of the process of updating the Edina's zoning regulations, suggested the development of a City of Edina "Green Team ", offered ways to engage local businesses in meaningful ways assisting them to change practices reducing Edina's carbon footprint, expressed the desire to engage the community as a whole and presented ideas for educating the public on energy and environmental concerns. The August 18, 2009, 7:30 p.m. "Our Clean Energy Future," an Edina dialogue program featuring. Bill McKibben and Will Steger in the Leo Fick Auditorium of the Edina High School was noted. Preceding the dialogue program there will be a ,Clean Energy Resource Fair at 5:30 p.m. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Man en, City Clerk' Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 7, 2009- James C. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE STUDY SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 23, 2009 7:30 A.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:45 a.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh and Mayor Hovland. Member Swenson entered the meeting at 7:50 a.m. Member Brindle was absent. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Wayne Houle, Public Works Director /City Engineer; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Sharon Allison, Engineering Secretary; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the study session was to review the possibility of establishing a City Street Light Utility or beginning to collect franchise fees from Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy. Staff outlined key points of a potential street light utility. It was noted there was a desire to cover the annual approximate $500,000 cost of the electrical bills paid by the City for street lighting historically paid by the General Fund. The first year would cover one -half of the expense in order to establish a cash reserve in the Street Light Utility Fund. Staff reviewed rates charged by other Minnesota cities with Street Light Utilities and presented Edina's potential residential and commercial rates both for operating costs only and for operating costs plus capital costs. Example bills were reviewed. Council's discussion included: reason not historically used in the past, commercial vs. residential rates, levels of street lighting throughout the city, if 2010 would be the correct year to initiate this program, whether or not to fund capital costs, if the inclusion of capital costs would lead to more residents desiring street light improvements with neighborhood street reconstruction, lighting levels, energy efficiency of street light system, where funds realized from a street light utility could be spent, city authority to enact street light utility and delinquent bills. Staff also reviewed the possibility of initiating franchise fees such as paid by the cable television provider Comcast with the City's other two franchisees Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy. Discussion included: legal authority to collect franchise fees, terms of existing franchises, potential use of funds collected as franchise fees, and amount of potential fees. Council will need to review each option and think about the philosophical implications involved in each one. Utilizing one or the other fee would allow the 2010 budget to be balanced without cuts to current service levels or programs. More discussion and detailed information will be taken up at future meetings. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 9:20 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 7, 2009. James C. Hovland, Mayor H Planning Commission Recommended Action: On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution on pages Al -A2, which would revise the Zoning Ordinance to require a conditional use permit for all accessory buildings over 1,000 square feet in the R -1 Zoning District. Should the City Council adopt this resolution, the Interlachen Country Club would have to go back through the exact same Conditional Use Permit Process that they have just gone through over the past several months. The maintenance building and its size have been factored into the review of the conditional use permit for the parking lot. In fact, as a result of the consideration of the maintenance building, the plans have been revised as follows: The landscaping was significantly enhanced; the size of the building was reduced; openings to the buildings were changed from facing the residential area to facing the golf course; the building was relocated and shifted further away from adjacent residential homes; and the building was upgraded from a grey metal building to a stucco building that matches the existing club house. To require Interlachen to go through the same process that they have just been through seems unnecessary. Staff Recommendation: Staff had originally recommended to the Planning Commission, approval of the attached resolution on Page A3 -A4, which would limit the size of accessory buildings on property with single - family lots to 1,000 square feet. Accessory buildings on property in which there is a conditionally permitted use would not be limited to size. However, staff would concur with the Planning Commission that a Conditional Use Permit for buildings over 1,000 square feet would REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item ILA Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only F] Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends FI To HRA ® To Council Subject: Zoning Ordinance amendment regarding the Action ® Motion regulation of accessory buildings in the R -1 Zoning Resolution District. ® Ordinance FI Discussion Planning Commission Recommended Action: On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution on pages Al -A2, which would revise the Zoning Ordinance to require a conditional use permit for all accessory buildings over 1,000 square feet in the R -1 Zoning District. Should the City Council adopt this resolution, the Interlachen Country Club would have to go back through the exact same Conditional Use Permit Process that they have just gone through over the past several months. The maintenance building and its size have been factored into the review of the conditional use permit for the parking lot. In fact, as a result of the consideration of the maintenance building, the plans have been revised as follows: The landscaping was significantly enhanced; the size of the building was reduced; openings to the buildings were changed from facing the residential area to facing the golf course; the building was relocated and shifted further away from adjacent residential homes; and the building was upgraded from a grey metal building to a stucco building that matches the existing club house. To require Interlachen to go through the same process that they have just been through seems unnecessary. Staff Recommendation: Staff had originally recommended to the Planning Commission, approval of the attached resolution on Page A3 -A4, which would limit the size of accessory buildings on property with single - family lots to 1,000 square feet. Accessory buildings on property in which there is a conditionally permitted use would not be limited to size. However, staff would concur with the Planning Commission that a Conditional Use Permit for buildings over 1,000 square feet would be appropriate for a site on which there is a Conditional Use Permit, such as a school, church or golf course. Staff would offer an alternative recommendation, in which the City Council would adopt the original resolution presented to the Planning Commission (pages A3 -A4), and then authorize the Planning Commission to include in their revisions to the Zoning Ordinance, the requirement for accessory buildings over 1,000 square feet in size to be a conditionally permitted use. This alternative would allow Interlachen Country Club to proceed with their maintenance building, as they have already been through the Conditional Use Permit process. Further, it would allow the Planning Commission to further investigate and consider additional conditions such as setback from residential properties, building materials, height, etc. Staff would further recommend waiving second reading, if the Council is comfortable with the ordinance changes. Information/Background: Attached are the following: • Alternative resolutions for City Council consideration. • Planning Commission minutes. • The Planning Commission report. • Background information on the Braemar maintenance buildings, the definition of accessory building, and building coverage requirements. ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING REGULATION OF ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 2 is hereby amended to add the following: 850.11. Subd.2 Conditional Uses. H. Accessory buildings 1,000 square feet or larger located on propert y on which a conditionally permitted use exists. Section 2. Sub Section 850.11. Subdivision 3 is hereby amended to add the following: 850.11. Subd. 3. Accessory Uses. B. Uses and facilities accessory to an on the same lot as a golf course, including maintenance buildings, golf driving ranges, swimming pools, tennis courts and other related recreational facilities. Accessory buildings 1,000 square feet or larger require a conditional use permit. Section 3. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6 is hereby amended to read as follows: 850.11. Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. h( 1. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. , -.-... --, — . . - . — , ....... _........... -... -- -- — -. -- - - - -I -- -I — aGGessnn, buildings anti a+F„ntWes , ovnl, nn Ji#nhed narooc a a n , shall nn+ eXG8e l 1,000 square fe Accessory buildings 1,000 square feet or larger on a property with a conditionally permitted use are required a conditional use permit. 2. Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk 4a ORDINANCE NO. 2009-08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING REGULATION OF ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6 is hereby amended to read as follows: 850.11. Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - -- -- - - WAR 2. Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009 City Clerk PC Meeting May 27, Page 10 of 22 east or west. The other half oft vari nce deals with unit size and that requirement was stipulated by c _de-�;"Re' gyrating, Commissioner Staunton encouraged the applic wild their case-toqu the requested variances. 2009.0004.09a Amend Zoning Ordinance 850.11. Subd 6. A. Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission it has come to staffs attention, as part of the review of the proposal by Interlachen Golf Course to build a new maintenance facility, that there are inconsistencies in the zoning ordinance in regard to regulation of accessory buildings in the R -1 Zoning District. The following summarizes the inconsistencies: 1. Lots 9,000 square feet and larger are limited to 1,000 square feet of accessory buildings. 2. Lots less than 9,000 square feet have no limit on the size of accessory buildings. 3. Lots with single - dwelling unit buildings are limited to no more than 1,000 square feet. 4. Maintenance buildings are a permitted accessory use to a golf course, with no size limitation mentioned in the regulation. Planner Teague explained the intent of the ordinance is to limit single - dwelling unit buildings to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. However, provision #1 technically prohibits all R -1 property, including schools and golf courses to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. The proposal before the Planning Commission is a Zoning Ordinance amendment to eliminate the 1,000 square foot limitation for lots over 9,000 square feet, which would lift the 1,000 square foot accessory building limitation on conditionally permitted uses. Planner Teague explained that the 1,000 square foot limit was added to the Zoning Ordinance back in the early 1990's. The intent of the ordinance was to address the issue the city was dealing with at the time regarding large accessory structures being built on property with single - family homes to store boats, RV's, lawn equipment etc. However, it appears that the ordinance was not codified correctly. The provision listed in Subdivision 6.A.3. was'intended to address the issue. Planner Teague stated that over the years, Edina Schools, Braemar and Fred Richards Golf Course, Edina Country Club, and the Interlachen Country Club PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 11 of 22 have constructed a number of accessory buildings that far exceed 1,000 square feet. With the aid of graphics Planner Teague depicted the square footage of accessory structures throughout the City. They are as follows: Braemar: e 17,200 square feet of maintenance buildings. e 30,000 square foot golf dome. e 40,000 square foot ice rink. e 25,000 square foot ice rink. e 28,750 square foot ice rink (93,000 square foot total ice rink facility.) e 35,760 square foot police /fire training facilities e 1,600 square foot concession stand. Fred Richards Golf Course: e 3,600 square feet of maintenance buildings. Edina Country Club: e 2,500 square foot tennis court building. e 2,800 square foot pool building. e 8,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. Edina Community Center Site: e 4,000 square foot maintenance /storage buildings Cornelia: e 2,440 square feet of maintenance /storage buildings. Interlachen: e 13,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. e 6,500 square feet of other accessory buildings. Planner Teague pointed out the following accessory buildings have been built after 1992 without a variance: Braemar: • In 1996 a cart storage building was constructed. • In 2001, an antenna building was constructed. • In 2007 the public safety training facility and storage building were built. • Accessory buildings and concession stands were also built at Courtney fields. Fred Richards Golf Course: e In 2003 the two maintenance buildings totaling 3,600 square feet were constructed. Edina CC: e In 2000, a large addition was built on an existing maintenance building. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 12 of 22 Interlachen: • In 1993 -94, the existing 4,000 square foot storage & fertilizer building on the site where the new maintenance facility is proposed by Interlachen was built. • In 1998, the pool house was reconstructed. At the time of the ordinance amendment, there was no discussion of existing buildings becoming nonconforming. Since 1992, no variances have been granted for accessory buildings that have been built on these sites. Concluding Planner Teague stated to address this issue, staff recommends that the City Council approve an ordinance amendment that would eliminate the 1,000 square foot provision for lots over 9,000 square feet. Comments and Questions from the Commission Commissioners agreed that this section of 850 needs revision; however, the general consensus was that a "cap" should be placed on the size of accessory buildings/ structures. This would prevent the construction of overly large buildings. Commissioners acknowledged that current lot coverage requirements limit the size of accessory building /structures on the majority of -R -1 lots; however, if a size "cap" isn't introduced the overly large " R -1 lots ", that include golf courses, churches, and schools, etc. could have large or an excessive number of accessory buildings constructed that would impact neighboring properties. Planner Teague agreed adding that clearly the intent of the ordinance was to limit the size of accessory structures to a combined total of 1,000 square feet for single family home lots, not golf courses, schools, churches which are also zoned R -1 and designated as principal or conditional uses. The discussion continued with Commissioners expressing frustration with the situation they now find themselves in, and fairness. Commissioners pointed out this ordinance "inconsistency" puts everyone in an awkward position, especially in light of the next agenda item. Commissioners reiterated their agreement that the ordinance in question needs revising; however, the timing is difficult at best. Commissioners also noted besides the difficulty with the request from ICC the Commission is also in the process of revising the entire zoning ordinance. The goal of the Commission during the revision process is to make sure all revisions are properly researched and addressed to prevent confusion and oversight. Chair Fischer asked Mr. Knutson if the proper procedure was met regarding this agenda item. Mr. Knutson responded procedure was met. The City Council is the body that holds the public hearing on amendments to the City Code. The Commission is to comment and recommend. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 13 of 22 Continuing, City Attorney, Roger Knuston told Commissioners he understands their frustration; however, at this time the Planning Commission needs to act on what is before them and not "get lost' in all the possibilities. Continuing, Mr. Knutson explained the proposed ordinance revision requires a recommendation from the Commission before the public hearing is conducted by the City Council. Regarding the request for a Conditional Use Permit from Interlachen Country Club for additional parking that also requires Commission action. Mr. Knutson said the Commission can either deny the request from ICC for a Conditional Use Permit for parking or approve it. The proposed maintenance buildings on Club grounds would either require a variance; a CUP or the Council can amend the Ordinance allowing structures in excess of 1,000 square feet. If a variance. is required the Zoning Board of Appeals will hear the request for the maintenance buildings, not Commission. If the Code is amended by Council requiring maintenance buildings over 1,000 square feet to require a CUP, the Commission will hear the CUP request on maintenance buildings and forward their recommendation to the City Council. Lastly, if the Council initiates a Code change allowing maintenance buildings in excess of 1,000 square feet on lots greater than 9,000 square feet (or such number) ICC can obtain a building permit. Concluding, Mr. Knutson clarified that the next agenda item is a CUP for ,parking spaces. Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend amending Ordinance 850 as follows: Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures; provided, however, that on lots without single family structures accessory structures greater than 1,000 square feet require a Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Chair Fischer invited the public to comment, noting the City Council will hold the public hearing. Public Comment Melissa Franzen, 6216 Maloney Avenue told the Commission she is opposed to the proposed text change. She pointed out not all parties were notified of the change, adding in her opinion the proposed change is a major code amendment. Concluding, Ms. Franzen asked the Commission to table the requested code amendment. Ronald Diker, 6309 Maloney, agreed with Ms. Franzen that the proposed code change was not given proper notification. Mr. Diker said he believes the proposed change would have a tremendous impact on neighbors and asked the Commission not to "rush" this change forward. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 14 of 22 Commissioner Staunton asked Mr. Knutson and Mr. Teague to "sand- paper" the recommendation and at their discretion place the proposed amendment language in the section of 850 they see fit. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Staunton, Grabiel, Forrest, Fischer. Nays, Risser, Carpenter. Motion carried. 2008- 0013.09b Conditional Use Permit Interlachen ountry Club 6200 Interlac en Boulevard, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commissi, n requesting a Conditional Use Permit to eT parking lot is for a new maintenance builds 6200 Interlachen Boulevard. Maintenance use not a conditional use. Because the ne the maintenance building, the maintenance Interlachen Country Club is and a park�g lot. The expanded ?g for the�nterlachen Country Club at uildin yy�� are a permitted accessory nee Planner Teague explained the applicant with a maintenance facility at the end of reviewed by the Planning Commission c for a parking lot is intertwined with buj ding will also be addressed. ly proposed a similar parking lot Lane. Those plans were per 1, 2008 and January 28, 2009. Based on the direction from the /Planning Commission on January 28ti', the appliicant has revised the plans locate the building on what was referred to as the "chicken farm site" south of a originally p oposed site. The size of the main building has been reduced f om 20,000 squ re feet, and the building redesigned to match the existin club house. The pplicant is no longer requesting a Vacation of a po ion of Belmore Lane or a lot division. Planner Teague pointed op4 the new parking lot wou' d be located on the east side of a new 16,440 sgy-are foot maintenance facility and on the west side of a 1,840 square foot "cad y lounge" addition to the exisi g cart storage building. This existing building ould be remodeled to match th proposed new building. To accommodate tF� d request, two existing single - family homes and the existing maintenance buil ing would be removed. The proposed site is currently used as a staging area d storage of materials by the maintenance crew. Continuing, lanner Teague explained that access to the new maintenance building w uld be from an existing interior road off Interlachen Boulevard and Waterma Avenue. There would be no access off Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. A uture "short course" would be located to the north of the proposed for them to a ss and the City approved their c cu a County took a rtion of their property for High y 100. Commissioner M elland told the Commission in he pinio re is a problem with ew subdivision ordinance No. 804 She ed, and again this is opinion, that the new ordinance e o distort neighborhoods, he median and" average lot s seem to be perplexing whe calculating neighborhoods. Sh inted out the "neighborhood" this case even includes hous the other side of Highway 100. She noted that the last fo ve subdivision proposals seem have demonstrated a weakn it his ordinance. Continuing, Co ssioner McClelland sai a does of fault staff for the proble with the new ordin but qu tioned if the ordinance shoul a reconsidered. C ssioner Mc elland pointed out this propos needs five vari s which is a reme for a new development. C issioner McC and concluded at she cannot support the pro sal as prese but agrees wit taff that the creation of one w lot is opriate for the si Mr. Larsen expla ed th electing the median lot ize within the ordinance actua y its a proposal when th a is a large variation in to within a neighborhood. Commissioner r said he agrees with staff's re endation and moved to r d approval of creating one new of subject to staff c ion and to recommend denial of t proposal as prese , whi depicts the creation of new lots. Co loner Mc lland seconded the motion. Aye Hale, Faust, lland, Palm �SV11 {.�- GY • "- Cj Various Zoning ordinance Amendments Mr. Larsen presented three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance; the first is how we interpret setbacks for living space in and above an accessory structure, an example being space above an existing garage. This has created problems in ordinance interpretation and what we have proposed eliminates any problems. Commissioner McClelland said in reality this means that the setback for an accessory structure is the same as the principle structure. Mr. Larsen said that is correct. Mr. Larsen said this could create more requests for variance. Commissioner Faust said in her opinion the ordinance doesn't appear to include attached garages. She asked if the wording could change to add attached garage. Mr. Larsen responded that that is a good idea, adding, the ordinance amendment could read "including but not limited to attached garages ". Mr. Larsen said the other two amendments address problems identified by staff. The most recent example is someone who has a small house on a lot and wishes to construct a "pole barn" on the property. Mr. Larsen pointed out this is not an appropriate residential use. He added staff believes there should be a limit of l000 square feet for accessory buildings. Mr. Larsen explained this will enable residents to have a three car garage, and give us some control in what is placed on a residential lot. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said height has been a problem within the City. He added there have been instances where a resident puts a "second story" on an accessory structure and tell staff it is only rafter space. This prevents City control if in the future they decide to heat the "rafter space" and create a living area for a studio, mother -in -law apartments etc. Mr. Larsen concluded staff believes there are no legal reasons for a two story dwelling as an accessory building. Commissioner McClelland asked why the 18 foot height was chosen. She pointed out 18 feet is quite high. Mr. Larsen said this height was chosen because the pitch of roofs in new construction seem to be quite steep and this would allow for construction of a garage that would have a matching pitched roof. Mr. Larsen said there will always be someone "pushing the rules" but this is very rare. Commissioner McClelland noted at present the variance board deals with quite a number of requests for height setbacks. She added the variance board may have to be stricter in their enforcement of height rules. Mr. Palmer moved to recommend adoption of the variance amendments, as modified to include attached garages. Mr. Hale seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 7/15/91 the conditions as listed. 151 In response to Member Rice, Planner Larsen clarified that access to the existing home would be off the Normandale Boulevard frontage road. Mayor Richards asked for comment from the proponents. Planner Larsen observed that, since they had agreed to accept the Planning Commissions's recommendation, they perhaps felt they need not be present. Mayor Richards said he would like confirmation from the proponents that they had accepted the two lot plan. Mayor Richards noted that a letter had been received from Mark Simonson on July 15, 1991, opposing the three lot subdivision proposal. Public Comment Tom Grace, 6528 Josephine Avenue, said he was opposed to three lots but would not object to a two lot subdivision. Kevin Ries, 5012 Nob Hill, stated that he was representing fifteen property owners who have petitioned against the three lot subdivision. They would support the Planning Commission's recommendation for a two lot subdivision. Council Comment /Action Member Smith reminded the Council that the proponent originally had presented a three lot subdivision. He said he would like a response from the proponents in person or in writing before granting preliminary plat approval for a two lot subdivision. He recommended this be continued to August 5, 1991, to allow the proponents time to respond. Member Smith made a motion to continue the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for the Sever Addition to August 5, 1991- Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO 825-A41 (AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen advised that the Community Development and Planning Commission considered and recommended adoption of three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance at its June 26, 1991. In summary, the amendments would require: 1) Accessory buildings or structures used for dwelling purposes shall comply with all minimum setback requirements for a single dwelling unit building. 2) Freestanding buildings or structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings would be limited to one story or 18 feet in height, whichever is less. 3) The combined total building coverage of accessory buildings or structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. Member Rice introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A41 and moved adoption as follows, with waiver of Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A41 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO ESTABLISH FOR ALL ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES A MAXIMUM COVERAGE AND A MAXIMUM HEIGHT, AND TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACKS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES USED FOR DWELLING PURPOSES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph 1, of Paragraph F. of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District [R -1]) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: 7/15/91 152 r . "1. Buildings Coverage: Not over 25% for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet." Sec. 2. Subparagraph 2. of Paragraph G. of Section 11 (Single Dwelling unit District [R -1] of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. Building Coverage - Lots Less Than 9 000 Square Feet in Area. Building Coverage may be increased to 30% for lots less than 9,000 square feet in area, provided, however, that the area occupied by buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet, and provided, further, however, that the combined total area occupied by all necessary buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet." Sec. 3. Subparagraph 3. of Paragraph F. of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District [R -1]) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) single dwelling unit buildings, 2 1/2 stories or 30 feet, and buildings and structures whichever is less accessory and attached thereto 1 sto or 1S feet, (b) buildings and structures accessory whichever is less to single dwelling unit buildings but not attached thereto 3 stories or 40 feet, (c) all other buildings and structures whichever is less." Sec. 4. Subparagraph 1. of Paragraph G. of Section 11 is hereby amended by adding a new subpart thereto as follows: "(g) Accessory Buildin s and Structures IIsed for Dwelliza Pura oseS. If any if accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), or any addition to or expansion of (including, without limitation, an additional story on) an accessory building or structure (3ncluding,w thoutrli nation garages), is used or intended for use, in whole or in part, occupancy, then such accessory building or structure or such addition or expansion, shall comply with all of the m;* imm setback requirements for a single dwelling unit building." Sec. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and affect upon its assage and publication. /'��z��'�' [/ Wayor ATTEST: vv( Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. BIDS AWARDED FOR POOL RENOVATION /AAIIATIC_ CENTER Manager Rosiand recalled that the original cost estimate for the pool renovation /aquatic center was $550,000.00. When first bid the low bid came in at $723,300.00 and was rejected by the Council. After analyzing the bid, staff recommended rebidding the project with 14 separate contracts. The rebidding process resulted in a total recommended bid of $605,000.00, or $55,000.00 over the original cost estimate for the project. Staff would recommend award of recommended bids except for the contract for play structures. The recommendation would be to reject this bid and to rebid the item. Manager Rosland explained that the wading pool and wading =pool structures have been reduced in size, while the full size slide remains. He pointed out that renovation of the existing pool alone would cost $350,000 350, 00 - $400,000 to meet code changes since the pool was built thirty y ago. Following brief regarding aendance, project, projected adult increase in es, and debt service on the p ool cy'9ZN�,r�, .by PLANNING .COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 27, 2009 2009.0004.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description It has come to staffs attention, as part of the review of the proposal by Interlachen Golf Course to build a new maintenance facility, that there are inconsistencies in the zoning ordinance in regard to regulation of accessory buildings in the R -1 Zoning District. The following summarizes the inconsistencies: 1. Lots 9,000 square feet and larger are limited to 1,000 square feet of accessory buildings. 2. Lots less than 9,000 square feet have no limit on the size of accessory buildings. 3. Lots with single - dwelling unit buildings are limited to no more than 1,000 square feet. 4. Maintenance buildings are a permitted accessory use to a golf course, with no size limitation mentioned in the regulation. The intent of the ordinance is to limit single - dwelling unit buildings to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. However, provision #1 technically prohibits all R -1 property, including schools and golf courses to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. The proposal before the Planning Commission is a Zoning Ordinance amendment to eliminate the 1,000 square foot limitation for lots over 9,000 square feet, which would lift the 1,000 square foot accessory building limitation on conditionally permitted uses. The specific language from the Zoning Ordinance is as follows: 850.11. Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. 1. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be no more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. 2. Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. 850.11 Subd. 3 Accessory Uses A. Uses and facilities accessory to and on the same lot as a golf course, including maintenance buildings, golf driving ranges, swimming pools, tennis courts and other related recreational facilities. According to the strictest interpretation of the above regulations, Interlachen (and all other schools and'golf courses) are limited to 1,000 square feet of accessory buildings. History The 1,000 square foot limit was added to the Zoning Ordinance back in the early 1990's. The intent of the ordinance was to address the issue the city was dealing with at the time regarding large accessory structures being built on property with single - family homes to store boats, RV's, lawn equipment etc. However, it appears that the ordinance was not codified correctly. The provision listed in Subdivision 6.A.3. was intended to address the issue. However, Subd. 6.A.1 states that lots 9,000 square feet and greater are limited to 1,000 square feet for accessory structures. Subd. 6.A.2, states that lots less than 9,000 square feet, would be allowed accessory buildings over 1,000 square feet. This doesn't seem to make sense. Again, the intent of the section of the ordinance is for single - family homes, not conditionally permitted uses, such as schools and golf courses. Over the years, Edina Schools, Braemar and Fred Richards Golf Course, Edina Country Club, and the Interlachen Country Club have constructed a number of 2 accessory buildings that far exceed 1,000 square feet on their sites. The following list demonstrates the number of accessory buildings on R -1 sites that exceed 1,000 square feet: Braemar • 17,200 square feet of maintenance buildings. • 30,000 square foot golf dome. • 40,000 square foot ice rink. • 25,000 square foot ice rink. 28,750 square foot ice rink (93,000 square foot total ice rink facility.) • 35,760 square foot police/fire training facilities • 1,600 square foot concession stand. Fred Richards Golf Course • 3,600 square feet of maintenance buildings. Edina Country Club • 2,500 square foot tennis court building. 2,800 square foot pool building. • 8,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. Edina Community Center Site • 4,000 square foot maintenance /storage buildings Cornelia • 2,440 square feet of maintenance /storage buildings. Interlachen • 13,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. • 6,500 square feet of other accessory buildings. The following accessory buildings have been built after 1992 without a variance: Braemar • In 1996 a cart storage building was constructed. • In 2001, an antenna building was constructed. • In 2007 the public safety training facility and storage building were built. • Accessory buildings and concession stands were also built at Courtney fields. Fred Richards Golf Course • In 2003 the two maintenance buildings totaling 3,600 square feet were constructed. 3 Edina CC • In 2000, a large addition was built on an existing maintenance building. Interlachen • In 1993 -94, the existing 4,000 square foot storage &fertilizer building on the site where the new maintenance facility is proposed by Interlachen was built. • In 1998, the pool house was reconstructed. At the time of the ordinance amendment, there was no discussion of existing buildings becoming nonconforming. Since 1992, no variances have been granted for accessory buildings that have been built on these sites. Conclusion To address this issue, staff recommends an ordinance amendment (attached) that would eliminate the 1,000 square foot provision for lots over 9,000 square feet. As written, provision #3 would stand on its own, as it was intended, and R -1 properties with single - family homes would be limited to 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. Conditionally permitted uses such as schools and golf courses, would not be limited to the size of accessory buildings. This is how the Code has been interpreted over the years, as demonstrated in the information above. Recommended Action Recommend that the City Council approve the ordinance amendment on page Al.) IH ORDINANCE NO. 2009— AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING REGULATION OF ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6 is hereby amended to read as follows: 850.11. Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. 1. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. 2. Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. 211 for them to a ss and the City approved their c b cut a County took a rtion of their property for Highigy 100. Commissioner M lelland told the Commission in he pinio re is a problem with ew subdivision ordinance No. 804 She ed, and again this is opinion, that the new ordinance e o distort neighborhoods, he median and average lot s seem to be perplexing whe calculating neighborhoods. Sh inted out the "neighborhood" this case even includes hous the other side of Highway 100. She noted that the last fo ve subdivision proposals seem have demonstrated a weakn wit his ordinance. Continuing, Co ssioner McClelland sal a does of fault staff for the proble with the new ordin but qu tioned if the ordinance shoul a reconsidered. C ssioner Mc elland pointed out this propos needs five vari s which is a reme for a new development. C issioner McC and concluded at she cannot support the pro sal as prese but agrees wit taff that the creation of one w lot is opriate for the si Mr. Larsen expl ed th electing the median lot ize within the ordinance actua y fits a proposal when th a is a large variation in to within a neighborhood. Commissioner r said he agrees with staff's re endation and moved to r d approval of creating one new of subject to stafelland. ion and to recommend denial of t proposal as pres whi depicts the creation of new lots. Co er Mc lland seconded the motion. Aye Hale, Faust, Pa Q� 0-1\ Various G `v� * Various Zoning Ordinance Amendments Mr. Larsen presented three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance; the first is how we interpret setbacks for living space in and above an accessory structure, an example being space above an existing garage. This has created problems in ordinance interpretation and what we have proposed eliminates any problems. Commissioner McClelland said in reality this means that the setback for an accessory structure is.the same as the principle structure. Mr. Larsen said that is correct. Mr. Larsen said this could create more requests for variance. Commissioner Faust said in her opinion the ordinance doesn't appear to include attached garages. She asked if the wording could change to add attached garage. Mr. Larsen responded that that is a good idea, adding, the ordinance amendment could read "including but not limited to attached garages ". Mr. Larsen said the other two amendments address problems identified by staff. The most recent example is someone who has a small house on a lot and wishes to construct a "pole barn" on the property. Mr. Larsen pointed out this is not an appropriate residential use. He added staff believes there should be a limit of 1000 square feet for accessory buildings. Mr. Larsen explained this will enable residents to have a three car garage, and give us some control in what is placed on a residential lot. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said height has been a problem within the City. He added there have been instances -where a resident puts a "second story" on an accessory structure and tell staff it is only rafter space. This prevents City control if in the future they decide to heat the "rafter space" and create a living area for a studio, mother -in -law apartments etc. Mr. Larsen concluded staff believes there are no legal reasons for a two story dwelling as an accessory building. Commissioner McClelland asked why the 18 foot height was chosen. She pointed out 18 feet is quite high. Mr. Larsen said this height was chosen because the pitch of roofs in new construction seem to be quite steep and this would allow for construction of a garage that would have a matching pitched roof. Mr. Larsen said there will always be someone "pushing the rules" but this is very rare. Commissioner McClelland noted at present the variance board deals with Vite a number of requests for height setbacks. She added the variance board may have to be stricter in their enforcement of height rules. Mr. Palmer moved to recommend adoption of the variance amendments, as modified to include attached garages. Mr. Hale seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 1 1 1 7/15/91 the conditions as listed. 15, 1 In response to Member Rice, Planner Larsen clarified that access to the existing home would be off the Normandale Boulevard frontage road. Mayor Richards asked for comment from the proponents. Planner Larsen observed that, since they had agreed to accept the Planning Commissions's recommendation, they perhaps felt they need not be present. Mayor Richards said he would like confirmation from the proponents that they had accepted the two lot plan. Mayor Richards noted that a letter had been received from Mark Simonson on July 15, 1991, opposing the three lot subdivision proposal. Public Comment Tom Grace, 6528 Josephine Avenue, said he was opposed to three lots but would not object to a two lot subdivision. Kevin Ries, 5012 Nob Hill, stated that he was representing fifteen property owners who have petitioned against the three lot subdivision. They would support the Planning Commission's recommendation for a two lot subdivision. Council Comment /Action Member Smith reminded the Council that the proponent originally had presented a three lot subdivision. He said he would like a response from the proponents in person or in writing before granting preliminary plat approval for a two lot subdivision. He recommended this be continued to August 5, 1991, to allow the proponents time to respond. Member Smith made a motion to continue the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for the Sever Addition to August 5, 1991. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO 825-A41 (AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen-advised that the Community Development and Planning Commission considered and recommended adoption of three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance at its June 26, 1991. In summary, the amendments would require: 1) Accessory buildings or structures used for dwelling purposes shall comply with all minimum setback requirements for a single dwelling unit building. 2) Freestanding buildings or structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings would be limited to one story or 18 feet in height, whichever is less. 3) The combined total building coverage of accessory buildings or structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. Member Rice introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A41 and moved adoption as follows, with waiver of Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A41 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO ESTABLISH FOR ALL ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES A MAXIMUM COVERAGE AND A MAX33MM HEIGHT, AND TO ESTABLISH IEC MUM SETBACKS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS . AND STRUCTURES USED FOR DWELLING PURPOSES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section I. Subparagraph 1, of Paragraph F. of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District [R -1]) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: 7/15/91 1� "1. Building Coverage: Not over'25% for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet." Sec. 2. Subparagraph 2. of Paragraph G. of Section 11 (Single Duelling Unit District [R -1] of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. Building Coverage Lots Less Than 9.000 Square Feet in Area. Building Coverage may be increased to 30% for lots less than 9,000 square feet in area, provided, however, that the area occupied by buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet, and provided, farther, however, that the combined total area occupied by all necessary buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet." Sec. 3. Subparagraph 3. of Paragraph F. of Section 11 (Single Duelling Unit District [R -1]) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) single dwelling unit buildings, 2 1/2 stories or 30 feet, and buildings and structures whichever is less accessory and attached thereto (b) buildings and structures accessory 1 story or 18 feet, to single dwelling unit buildings wh ],chever is less but not attached thereto (c) all other buildings and structures 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less." Sec. 4. Subparagraph 1. of Paragraph G. of Section 11 is hereby amended by adding a new subpart thereto as follows: "(g) Accessory Buildings and Structures Used for Dwelling Purvoses. If any accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), or if any addition to.or expansion of (including, without limitation, an additional story on) an accessory building or structure (including, without limitation garages), is used or intended for use, in whole or in part, for residential occupancy, then such accessory building or structure or such addition or expansion, shall comply with all of the minimum setback requirements for a single dwelling unit building." Sec. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its assage and publication. / l L r� C. ATTEST: mayor 4rL� °yI 10,4i k Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. BIDS AVARDED FOR POOL. RENOVATION /AOIIATIC CENTER Manager Rosland recalled that the original cost estimate for the pool renovation /aquatic center was $550,000.00. 'Then first bid the low bid came in at $723,300.00 and was rejected by the Council. After analyzing the bid, staff recommended rebidding the project with 14 separate contracts. The rebidding process resulted in a total recommended bid of $605,000.00, or $55,000.00 over the original cost estimate for the project. Staff would recommend award of recommended bids except for the contract for play structures. 'The recommendation would be to reject this bid and to rebid the item. Manager Rosland explained that the wading pool and wading =pool structures have been reduced in size, while the full size slide remains. He pointed out that renovation of the existing pool alone would cost $350,000 - $400,000 to meet code changes since the pool was built thirty years ago. Following brief discussion regarding attendance, projected increase in revenues, and debt service on the pool renovation project, and adult swim periods, the aRAEMA-R MA-If3rEPVNCE gui LwJGs 1 plvcjaw�+ gor4 je- — MfA/erS C1c . a Locker roonnS (unU� room, S� op Coc o►[ Agri es rr,~ha�r rc�,�rS S%r�9e af Fit o � � i 3 Cola 56-fli9c Of P1U'p►ItA+ �' meci�an�c bays for lar'e i'C Pa�rS. T SgnA and! ravet Sto(q 9 � City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo 850.03 detract from the provisions of this Section. Any use not specifically allowed by this Section in a district as a principal, accessory or conditional use, shall not be allowed or permitted in that district by implication, interpretation or other construction of, or meaning given to, the wording of this Section. ubd. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, as used herein, have o lowing meanings: 4 Accessory Building. A separate building or structure or a portion of a principal building or structure used for accessory uses. Accessory Use. A use allowed by this Section which is subordinate to the principal use in terms of purpose, scope and extent and is located on the same lot as the principal use. Adult Body Painting Studio. An • establishment or business which provides the service of applying paint or other substance, whether transparent or non - transparent, to or on the body of a patron when such body is wholly or partially nude in terms of Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Bookstore. An establishment or business which barters, rents or sells items consisting of printed matter, pictures, slides, records, audio tape, videotape, or motion picture film and either alone or when combined with Adult Motion Picture Rental or Sales and Adult Novelty Sales within the same business premises has either 10 percent or more of its stock in trade or 10 percent or more of its floor area containing items which are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on the depiction or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Cabaret. An establishment or business which provides dancing or other live entertainment, if such dancing or other live entertainment is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Companionship Establishment. An establishment or business which provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk or discussion between an employee of the establishment and a customer, if such service is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Conversation/Rap Parlor. An establishment or business which provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or discussion, if such service is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Health/Sport Club. An establishment or business urhi lZ minors by reason of age and is distinikrP�' terized by 'an emphasis on Specified Se :ua? vi specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Hotel or Motel. A hotel or motel from which minors are specifically excluded from patronage and wherein material is presented which is distinguished 850 -5 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zonin 850.07 state that the design of the building and site has been prepared under the direct supervision of the architect. Subd. 9 Building Coverage Computations; Exclusions and Inclusions. A The following structures and improvements shall be excluded when computing uilding coverage: 1. Driveways and sidewalks, but not patios. 2. Parking lots and parking ramps. 3. Accessory recreational facilities not enclosed by solid walls and not covered by a roof, including outdoor swimming pools, tennis courts and shuffleboard courts; but facilities which are constructed above grade, such as paddle tennis courts, shall be included when computing building coverage. 4. Unenclosed and uncovered steps and stoops less than 50 square feet. 5. Overhanging eaves and roof projections not supported by posts or pillars. OB. Building coverage computations, however, shall include all other principal or cessory buildings, including, but not limited to: 1. Decks and patios subject to allowances provided by this Section. 2. Gazebos. 3. Balconies. 4. Breezeways. 5. Porches. 6. Accessory recreational facilities constructed above grade, such as paddle tennis courts. Subd. 10 Lighting. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than three foot - candles measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and ten foot - candles measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned non - residential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. Subd. 11 Frontage of Lots on a Street. All lots shall have at least 30 feet of frontage on at least one street other than alleys or limited access roadways to which private access is prohibited. Private easements shall not be considered as frontage for purposes of this Subdivision. Notwithstanding the requirements of this subdivision, lots in a townhouse plat 850 -44 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.11 other arch -type roof, to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof, or to the top of a cornice of a hip roof. 4. Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then for setback purposes the rear lot line .shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 5. Rear Yard Setback - Corner Lots Required to Maintain Two Front Street Setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. 6. Through Lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. 7. Accessory Buildings and Structures Used for Dwelling Purposes. Subject to the requirements of paragraph B. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850. 11, if any accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), or if any addition to or expansion of (including, without limitation, an additional story on) an accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), is used or intended for use, in whole or in part, for residential occupancy, then such accessory building or structure or such addition or expansion, shall comply with all of the minimum setback requirements for a single dwelling unit building. B. One Dwelling Unit Per Single Dwelling Unit Lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to Section 810 of this Code. C Decks and Patios. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 850.07, the irst 150 square feet of an unenclosed deck or patio shall not be included when computing building coverage. D. Basements.. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for purposes of this paragraph. E. Minimum Building Width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a single dwelling unit building shall measure less than 18 feet in width as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. 850 -70 Supplement 2008 -01 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo i 850.12 including, but not limited to, driveways, sidewalks, flagpoles and clotheslines. F. Customary home occupations. Subd. 3 Requirements for Lot Areas and Dimensions. A. Minimum Lot Area (per double dwelling 15,000 sq. ft. unit building B. Minimum Lot Width 90 ft. Subd. 4 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. 6A. Maximum Building Coverage 25% B. Setbacks (subject to the provisions of paragraph D. of Subd. 5 of this Subsection 850.12 1. Principal Use Buildings: Front street setback 30 ft. Side street setback 15 ft. Interior side yard setback 10 ft. Rear yard setback 35 ft. 2. Accessory Buildings and Structures. Setbacks for accessory buildings and structures shall be the same as those required by this Section for building and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings in the R -1 District. C. Height: 21 /z stories or 30 feet, whichever is less. Subd. 5 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the 'following special requirements shall apply. A. Application of Requirements. Requirements for lot area and dimensions, building coverage, setbacks and height shall be applied to the entire double dwelling unit building and the entire lot, and shall ignore any subdivision of building and lot which has been or may be made in order to convey each dwelling unit separately. B. Sewer and Water Connections. Each dwelling unit must be separately and independently connected to public sanitary sewer and water mains or shall have been granted a waiver thereof in accordance with Section 445 of this Code C. Subdivided R -2 Lots. A double dwelling unit building and lot may be subdivided pursuant to Section 810 of this Code along the common party walls between the dwelling units, provided that: 1. A building permit has been issued and the building foundation is in place; 2. Each parcel resulting from the subdivision must have frontage on a 850 -72 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina qo'� fSK Land Use, Platting and Zonin 850.13 principal building or otherwise completely underground. (No more than 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit shall be counted)., b. subtract 500 square feet for each dwelling unit if all principal buildings conform to all specifications of Type I or II construction as defined in the State Building Code as adopted by Section 410 of this Code. c. subtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if at least a 500 foot spacing is maintained between each principal and accessory building and the nearest lot line of a lot in the R -1 District used for residential purposes. d. add 500 square feet for each bedroom in excess of two in any one dwelling unit. e ubtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if the tract is within 2; 00 feet of an accessible freeway interchange (nearest lot line to center of interchange). a. all allowances permitted by paragraph B.1 of this Subd. 4 for PRD -3. b. subtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if the tract is three acres or more in area. c. subtract 250 square feet for each dwellin unit if total building coverage is less than ten percent. 3. PSR -3 and PSR -4 a. all allowances permitted by paragraph B.2 of this Subd. 4 for PRD -4. b. subtract 1,000 square feet for each senior citizen dwelling unit. Subd. 5 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, Height. A. aximum Building Coverage and FAR. Maximum FAR Building Coverage PRD - 1 25% -- PRD -2 25% -- PRD - 3 30% -- PRD - 4 30% -- 850 -75 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo ' 850.13 PRD - 5 35% 1.2 PSR - 3 30% -- PSR - 4 35% 1.2 B. Setbacks. 1. Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract. The required setbacks shall be increased to equal the building height for those buildings whose height. exceeds the minimum setbacks required. a. minimum setbacks are as follows: Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard PRD - 1 30' 30' 20' 25' PRD - 2 30' 30' 20' 35' PRD - 3 35' 35' 20' 35' PRD - 4,5 35' 35' 35' 35' PSR - 3,4 35' 35' 20' 35' Accessory Buildings Same as 10' 10' principal building C. Maximum Building Height. PRD - 1, 2 21/2 stories or 30 feet, whichever is less PRD - 3 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less PRD - 4,5 No maximum; height is determined by required setbacks. PSR - 3 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less. PSR - 4 No maximum; height is determined by required setbacks. Subd. 6 Usable Lot Area. Usable lot area not less than the amount specified below shall be provided on the tract. This space must be easily accessible by residents of the principal building. The front yard and side yard established by the required front street or side street setback and areas occupied by driveways, parking areas and buildings shall not be included as usable lot area. Areas within the tract and dedicated by the tract owner to the general public shall be included in usable lot area computations. 850 -76 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo ' 850.1 Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. (9r Maximum Building Coverage. 30 percent of the tract. Publicly owned buildings structures shall be excluded from building coverage computations. B. Maximum Floor Area Ratio. Non - residential uses shall not exceed a FAR of 0.5. Non- residential uses and residential uses in the aggregate shall not exceed an FAR of 1.0. Tract area shall include all area in the approved Overall Development Plan, exclusive of public street rights -of -way. Publicly owned buildings or structures shall be excluded from FAR computations. C. Setbacks. Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract or from public street right -of -way. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard MDD -3 35' 35' 20' 35' MDD -4 35' 35' 35' 35' MDD -5 50' 50' 50' 50' MDD -6 35' 35' 20' 35' The minimum building setback shall be increased by 1/z foot for each foot the building height exceeds the minimum required setback, provided, however, the required interior side yard setback shall not be less than 35 feet if the boundary of the tract adjoins land zoned and used for residential purposes. D. Maximum Building Height. MDD -3 3 stories or 40 ft. whichever is less MDD -4 4 stories or 50 ft. whichever is less MDD -5 No maximum, height determined by required setbacks MDD -6 No maximum, height determined by required setbacks Subd. 7 Usable Lot Area. Usable lot area not less than the amount specified below shall be provided on the tract. Publicly owned or operated civic, cultural or recreational facilities located on the tract may be counted as usable lot area. The front yard and side yard established by the required front street or side street setback and areas occupied by driveways, parking areas and garages shall not be counted as usable lot area. MDD -3 MDD -4 MDD -5 MDD -6 Per Dwelling Unit 400 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft. 200 sq. ft. 200 sq. ft. Subd. 8 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in 850 -81 Supplement 2008 -01 City of Edina Poo IM flct Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.15 D. Clubs, lodge halls and non - profit organizations, excluding those providing food or beverage services in the building or on the lot. E. Facilities for athletic, health or weight control purposes, including, but not limited to, handball, racquetball, tennis, reducing salons and aerobic dance studios, provided that no seating or other facilities shall be allowed for spectator usage. F. Medical and dental offices and clinics. G. Employment agencies. H. Travel bureaus. I. Day care. J. Public or private colleges, universities or schools. Subd. 3 Conditional Uses. A. Funeral Homes and Mortuaries Subd. 4 Accessory Uses. A. Off - street parking facilities. B. In buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more, ten percent of the gross floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 District and PCD -2 District, provided that the accessory uses are accessible only from the interior of the principal building and have no signs or displays relative thereto visible from the outside of the principal building. Subd. 5 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. Omaximum Building Coverage: 30 percent of the tract. B. Maximum Floor Area Ratio: 0.5 of the tract. C. Setbacks - shall be measured from the boundary of the tract: Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 35'* 35'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. D. Maximum Building Height. POD -1 4 stories or 50 feet whichever is less POD -2 no maximum; height is determined by required setbacks Subd. 6 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply: 850 -83 Supplement 2007 -06 .. � C � � t3 Q�► G�S City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zonin 850.16 automobile agency. Offices accessory to an allowed principal use. Subd. 10. Accessory Uses in PCD4. Accessory car washes. Retail sales of convenience goods. Gasoline sales accessory to a car wash. Subd. 11. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. aximum Floor Area Ratio (subject to the requirements of Subd. 12 of this bsection) PCD -1 1.0 of the tract PCD -2 1.5 of the tract PCD -3 i) North of West 70`h Street: 1.0 of the tract, provided that non - residential uses may not exceed 0.75. ii) South. of West 70' Street: 0.5 of the tract. PCD -4 0.3 of the tract B. Setbacks (Subject to the requirements of paragraphs A. and B. of Subd. 11 of this Subsection). Front Side Side Rear Yard Yard Yard Yard PCD -1 35'* 25'* 25'* 25'* PCD -2 35'* 25'* 25'* 25'* PCD -3 North of 70' St 35' ** 35' ** 35' ** 35' ** South of 70t St. 50 ** 50 ** 50 ** 50 ** PCD -4 35' 25' 25' 25' Gas Stations All other uses 45' 25' 45' 25' * or the building height if greater ** Subject to the requirements of Subd. 12 of this Subsection. C. Maximum Building Height. PCD -1 Two stories PCD -2 Four stories or 50 feet whichever is less PCD -3 Maximum height is determined by Paragraphs C and D of Subd. 12 of this Subsection. PCD -4 One story Subd. 12. Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in 950 -90 Supplement 2007 -06 Pit 0kJ�11Ci City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo 850.17 contiguous to other land in the Planned Industrial District. B. Minimum Lot Area. Two acres. C. Minimum Building Area. Each building shall have a gross floor area of not less than 10,000 square feet. OD Maximum Building Coverage. 1. Lots of less than three acres: 30 percent. 2. Lots of three acres or more: 45 percent. a. may be increased to 60 percent if the total gross floor area on the lot is contained within a single building and all portions of any,loading docks and berths are completely enclosed within the same single building. E. Maximum FAR: 0.5 1. May be increased to 0.6 for buildings which qualify for 60 percent building coverage as provided in paragraph D of Subd. 3 of this Subsection 850.17. F. Setbacks. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 50'* 50'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. G. Maximum Building Height. Four stories or 50 feet whichever is less. Subd. 4 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply: A. Increased Front Street and Side Street Setbacks. The minimum setback from a street shall be increased to 75 feet if the tract is located across the street from property in a residential district used for residential purposes. B. Increased Side Yard and Rear Yard Setbacks. The minimum setback from an interior lot line shall be increased to 100 feet if the lot line adjoins property in a residential district used for residential purposes. C. Temporary Retail Sales and Going out of Business Sales Permits. 1. The Manager may grant a permit for a temporary retail sale or going out of business sale, if: a. the temporary retail sale shall not exceed three consecutive days, and the going out of business sale shall not exceed ten consecutive days; b. not more than two temporary retail sale permits may be issued to any one person, firm, affiliate, subsidiary or building in a calendar year, and further provided that the two permitted sales must occur at least 60 days apart. Not more than one going out of business sale 850 -97 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zonind 850.18 A. Hospitals. B. Medical and dental offices and clinics. C. Laboratories for performing medical or dental research, diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical work, having a direct relationship to the providing of health services, including, but not limited to, medical research, radiology, hematology, serology, immunology, allergy, biochemistry, basal metabolism, microbiology, parasitology, pathology, histology, cytology, toxicology and pharmacology. Laboratories engaged in the production or manufacture of goods or products for commercial sale or distribution shall not be considered laboratories within the meaning and intent of this paragraph. Subd. 2 Accessory Uses. A. Living quarters and recreational and educational facilities for nurses, interns, staff members, hospital employees and volunteers, if the uses are located within or are contiguous to the principal building. B. Off - street parking facilities for ambulances, service trucks and automobiles owned by tenants, employees, patients and visitors. C. Within principal buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more, ten percent of the floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 and PCD -2 subdistricts, if the primary function of the uses is to serve the needs of occupants of, and visitors to, the principal use. D. Helistops for use by helicopters involved in emergency rescue operations. Subd. 3 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. AR: 1.0. B. Setbacks. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 35'* 35'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. C. Building Height. No maximum; height is determined by required setbacks. G . Minimum Tract Area. No tract of land shall be transferred to the Regional Medical District unless the tract measures at least ten acres in area or is contiguous to other land in the Regional Medical District. Subd. 4 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. All uses shall conform to the same requirements as are established by this Section for the Planned Office District (POD). B. All uses shall comply with the same standards for residual features as are established by this Section for the Planned Industrial District (PID) 850 -101 Supplement 2007 -06 To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: July 7, 2009 Subject: Conditional Use Permit to expand the parking lot at Interlachen Golf Course - 6200 Interlachen Blvd. KE.P(JK -1 %KEC L)MMEN UAT1UN Agenda Item Item II.B Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Planning Commission & Staff Recommended Action: On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the conditional use permit for the Interlachen Golf Course. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. (See attached minutes.) Staff also recommends approval subject to findings and conditions in the attached resolution. Plan revisions since the Planning Commission meeting: Based on recommendations from the Planning Commission and concerns of the adjacent residents, the applicant has made the following changes to the plans: • Building materials. The proposed building has been revised to have a brown roof instead of a red roof. • Building location. The building has been shifted 10 feet to the east, to be further away from the nearest homes. • Building height. Building height was reduced by 16 inches. • Landscape plan. The applicant worked with the adjacent neighbors to develop a revised landscape plan. Plantings were added to provide additional screening of the building, including: a double row of Techny Arborvitae, Lilacs, Dogwood, and Honeysuckle. • Fence. A chain link fence has been added between the wetlands from the building corners. Information/Background: Attached are the following documents: • , The resolution for City Council consideration. • The revised plans and narrative. • The Planning Commission minutes. • Background information on the Braemar maintenance buildings, the definition of accessory building, and building coverage requirements. • The original Planning Commission report and supporting plans. 2 s DISTANCE COURSE SQXT. of HOW PER to nearest maint. MANY CENT house buildings courses of total 100 feet Minneapolis Golf Club; St. Louis Park 8550 1 2.5 150 feet Brookview Golf Course; Golden Valley 2700 7 17 % Highland Park Golf Course; St. Paul 10800 Meadowbrook Golf Course; St. Louis Park < 5000 (2nd bldg. 200 feet away) Mendota Heights Par 3; Mendota Heights 1800 Midland Hills Country Club; Roseville 7200 New Hope Golf Course; New Hope < 4000 Oak Ridge Country Club; Hopkins 9000 175 feet Somerset Country Club; Mendota Heights 9000 1 2.5 200 feet Eagle Lake Golf Center; Plymouth 4300 4 10,70 Hollydale Golf Club; Plymouth 8100 Hiawatha Golf Course; Minneapolis < 9000 Mendakota Country Club; Mendota 9900 Heights 250 feet Begin Oaks Golf Course; Plymouth 5400 4 10 Dwan Golf Course; Bloomington 9000 Phalen Park Golf Course; St. Paul 5400 University of Minnesota Les Bolstad Golf 4050 Course; Falcon Heights 300 feet Cedarholm Golf Course; Roseville 1800 5 127o Edina Country Club; Edina 7200 Golden Valley Country Club; Golden Valley 9450 Hillcrest Country Club; St. Paul 2250 Minikanda Country Club; Minneapolis 6300 400 feet Centerbrook Golf Course; Brooklyn Center 900 1 2.5 500 feet Town and Country Club; St. Paul : , 5400 1 2.57o no houses Braemer Golf Course; Edina 17 41 nearby Brightwood Hills Golf Course; New Brighton Columbia Golf Course; Minneapolis Como Park Golf Course; St. Paul Elm Creek Golf Links; Plymouth Fort Snelling Golf Course; Minneapolis Francis Gross Golf Course; St. Anthony Fred Richards Golf Course; Edina Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center; Minnetonka Goodrich Golf Course; Maplewood Hyland Greens Golf Course; Bloomington Keller Golf Course; Maplewood Minnesota Valley Country Club; Bloomington Southview Country Club; West St. Paul Theodore Wirth Golf Course; Golden Valley Thompson Oaks Golf Course; West St. Paul Wayzata Country Club; Wayzata COMPARISON of AREAS of BUILDINGS Reduction: 1,848 / 2450-64 ='7m7 Old Plans New Plans Change in Area garages /bays 91600 97600 0 office -shop section 61840 61840 0 equipment wash 808 836 +28 storage for fertilizer, chemicals, soils, etc. 22880 1,500 -1,380 caddy lounge 936 11040 +104 cart storage 31000 21400 -600 Total sq. ft. 249,064 22,216 3 -1,848 Reduction: 1,848 / 2450-64 ='7m7 EDINA GOLF COURSES COURSE DISTANCE to nearest residence Edina 300 feet from nearest Country Club house; located close to the middle of the- course Braemar no houses nearby Golf Course Fred Richards houses nearby Golf Course RESOLUTION NO. 2009-59 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PARKING LOT WITH MAINTENTANCE BUILDINGS AT 6200 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD FOR THE INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Interlachen Country Club is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand a parking lot in conjunction with a new maintenance building. Maintenance buildings are a permitted accessory use not a conditional use. Because the need for the parking lot is intertwined with the maintenance building, the maintenance building is also addressed as part of the CUP. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.03 The applicant originally proposed to locate the maintenance facility at the end of Belmore Lane. Those plans were reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 1, 2008 and January 28, 2009. Based on the direction from the Planning Commission on January 28th, the applicant revised the plans to locate the building on what was referred to as the "chicken farm site" south of the originally proposed site. The size of the main building was reduced from 20,000 square feet, and the building redesigned to match the existing club house. 1.04 The new parking lot would be located as part of a new 16,440 square foot maintenance facility, and part of a 1,840 square foot "caddy lounge" addition to the existing cart storage building. This existing building would be remodeled to match the proposed new building. 1.05 To accommodate the request, two existing single - family homes and the existing maintenance building would be removed. The proposed site is currently used as a staging area and storage of materials by the maintenance crew. 1.06 On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for the Interlachen Golf Course. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The maintenance facility is a permitted accessory use. Associated uses proposed for these facilities are typical of a state -of -the art golf course country club. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-59 Page Two 4. The parking area and maintenance buildings would be well screened from adjacent properties, by existing and proposed trees and landscaping. 5. There would be an improvement to the quality of the existing wetlands, by removing the existing maintenance building that is located 15 feet from a wetland and by the construction of stormwater retention ponds that would filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. 6. The buildings would be constructed to match the existing clubhouse. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a parking lot and maintenance buildings at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped July 1, 2009. • Building materials board presented to the City Council on July 7, 2009. The roof must be brown as presented in the building elevations. • Grading & drainage plans date stamped June 29, 2009. • Utility plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Landscape plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Lighting plan date stamped June 29, 2009. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City will require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3. These lots must be combined with the golf course lot prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Access to the buildings shall be from the internal access points from Waterman Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, and not Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. 5. Maloney Avenue and Belmore Lane may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. 6. The buildings must meet all applicable building permit requirements. 7. All conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2009. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 7, 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2009-59 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned ;duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009. City Clerk Exhibit A SUBJECT PROPERTY PARCH. A: (Abstract) The South 370 feet of Mott 23. Mendelssohk except the West 12100 feet of the South 245 feat of said Blade 23. PARCEL 3: (Certificate of Title Na 237254) Par 1: Lob 2 and 3. Aud iar's Subdivision Noe 246. Hennepin County. Minnesot% and that part of Lot 1. Auditor's Subdivision lto. 240. Hennepin County. Minn., described as follows. to—wit Beginning at the Southeast comer of Block 25 Medelssohn. thence lsfastalr Wong the South I'ne of said Block a distance of 322 fact; thence Kalb padd to the West Oeu of said block a distance of 23x7 feet: thence an a foe running at an angle of 74 degrees 15 minutes to the MR from said lost described rice to the point of intersection with the Nast One of said Wade. thence Hrth Wong the West fine of said black to o point therein 350 fed South of the Northwest comer of sad Block 26. MendetasOm to the point of intersection of the disgond One as he mile afore described: thence cntimdmg Northwesterly an an extension of said diagaal Ike to an intersection with o One parallel to and 200 feat Nest of the East line of sold block 26: thence North along said parallel tine to an int - - % - tion with the North the of said Black 26: thence East doing said North line to the Northeast comer of said Block 26. thence North sing the Nest One of Black 24. Mendeismlw to the Northwest corner thereat. Memce East clang the North One of add Mock to the Northeast comer threat thence South donq the East the of Blades 24 and 25. MendelsaoM, to the point of begimnhis Pr 2: That part of East 10 rods of Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 29.7oweelhip 117. Range 21. described as fdtowc Beginning at the Southwest corm of the East 10 rods of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of sold Section 2$ thence North snug the Nest One sing sold tract, a dtatamce of 1000 fad. thence Southeast Is o straight The to a point 5 (set East of the Nest tree and 696 fed North of the South One of Me Eand 10 rods (ol) the Northeast Q wtr of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 2% thence Southerly in a straight One to a paid an the South line of acid tract. distant 3 feet Ent of the point of booming three Wind clang the mid Own 3 feet to the point of booming. all according to the Wilted States Coverrmnt survey threat. PARCEL C: (Certificate of TRW No. 366165) TM Ned 200 feet of the North 150 feet of Block 2. in Meadelasalm. according to the plot thereof an fie or of resound In the office of the Register of Deeds In and for said Hennepin County. PARCEL 0: (Certificate of Title Ne. 31116166) Block 9. In YenddssaM, ascept the So uib 200 fed of the Nest 115 feet thereof. as measured Wang the Ned and South Ones threat; exempt Was, the North 150 feet timmot according to the plat thereof an fie or of remrd in the office of the Register of 0 - - I in and for said He:neph Count} PARCEL E: (Certlticdse of Title No.466470) The South 200 feat of the Nest 115 fast of Block 9, ere measured long the Nast and South lines thmm 4 in Handelsadw, according to the plat thereof an fie or of record in the office of the Register of Oeeds in and far odd County. PARCEL F. (Certificate of TO* Na 711794) That port of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Saetan 30. Township 117. Range 21. described an commencing at a point an the South Inn of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30 distant 322 fed Wed from the Sortnat come of said Northeast Clutter, thence an an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 14 minutes 12 seconds, East, ponds! with the East tine of said Northeast Quarter, a distan a of 230.70 feet thane North 74 degrees 00 mhates 46 seconds Neak a distance of 225.57 fast theca Noah 0 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds Ent, o distance of 60 fad to the ached point d begtmft thence North 0 degrees 13 minutes 30 monde East a distance of 23163 feet. more or leas, to the South lime of Waterman Amwe, as shown an the plat of Ma ddssdaC thence Westerly long the South On of Waterman Avenue a distance of 12L70 feet to its Intersection with the Northerly estaneI, of the East One of 'Mirror late thew' a distance of 233.63 feet, mare or leas, to o One bearing North M degrees 52 minutes 45 sends West tram the acbA point of booming these South 36 degrees 52 minutes 45 aeeam I East a diabnce of 12240 fad to the actual point of beginning. PARCEL Q (CWUR,aI of Title Na 711794) Ali of the North 130 feet except We Went 200 fad thereat. Block 9. Mandelason. M -_-AwLrl That part of Black 26. MendelszWw, according to the rece=ded plat thereof. Hennepin County, Minnesota. Iying west of the most 200 toot Bred and lying north end amt of the Ghiowhq described Inc Commencing at the eoutheod comer of said plat of Mnddss ohm. thence west d" the south On of mid plat of MenddaaoM a distance d 32200 feet ti mm a n an asnumed been' nq of North 00 degrees 30 minutes 49 wean . West, parallel with the east Ins of mold plat of Mndelami^ a distance of 230.70 fed to the point of booming d the line to be theca North 74 degrees 45 mhata 47 seconds Wed a distance of 225.57 fact thanes North 00 degrees 31 minutes 29 seconds West to the south Ina of Wertamah Avenue and said line Uwe terminating. Fiva--- Lot 1. WlfI0WS A013710 . Hennepin County. Idwasatm �EVJ5Et July 1, 2009 City of Edina City Council 48oi West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Interlachen Country Club Edina, MN aTI v E ;HOWELL: ASCHITECT ' & ASSOC.,IN It is the intention of this project to demolish some, and upgrade other existing buildings and earthworks on the Interlachen Country Club property in addition to the construction of a new maintenance facility. Through demolition and remodeling of existing substandard buildings, the reworking of existing earth forms and the introduction of new trees, shrubs, and green areas as well as the construction of new and more functional maintenance facilities Interlachen Country Club will improve the appearance of its own facilities while preserving and improving the views from the surrounding neighborhood onto the site. Considerable time has been spent in cooperation with the neighbors of the surrounding areas of the Interlachen property to accommodate each others needs and desires. The location originally suggested for the construction of the maintenance facility has been changed and it is proposed to be relocated further south of the original site. The new location is between the ponds and adjacent to the existing environmental building. The present environmental building will be remodeled and reused as an expanded cart storage and environmental building. The areas on the Interlachen property that will be affected by this project will improve presently unused and unattended earthworks. The building site was formerly known as the "chicken farm area" due to its usage prior to purchase by Interlachen. The area will be improved to compliment and become a positive extension of the existing facilities. The views to these new buildings from adjacent properties will be controlled by enhanced landscaping. Traffic to these new buildings will be limited to the existing internal driveways and not clearly observable from off the course. The new buildings will be constructed with a similar Victorian flavor to the main clubhouse facility. This project was approved by the Edina Planning Commission on May 271h. Since that approval additional meetings with the neighbors to the west of the property have been held and several new concessions by Interlachen have been made to accommodate concerns of the neighborhood. The roofs of the buildings have been changed in color from red to brown. The peak of the maintenance building roof has been lowered by 16 ". The entire building has been moved lo' to the east to provide greater separation from the nearest homes. The earlier proposed fence has been replaced with additional landscaping. This project when complete will bring Interlachen Country Club physically to a level of integrity commensurate with its stature in the world golfing community and a place consistent with the image of the City of Edina. The design and construction team assembled here for this project by Interlachen Country Club has produced similar projects to this one most recently at the Hazeltine National Golf Course in Chanhassen, Minnesota. Visitation to that site is always welcomed. Barr Engineering, a nationally recognized engineering company based in Edina, MN is preparing the documents for the earthworks, landscaping, and environmental considerations. Truman Howell Architects & Associates, Inc is providing the design and working drawings for the new and remodeled buildings on the site. They are an architectural firm located in the Minnetonka area for over 30 years and prepared the design and documentation for the Hazeltine project. BH &H Construction Services, a sister company to TH -A is providing the construction for this project as they did in Hazeltine. All of the firms have extensive experience in their respective fields and are providing appropriate coordination with Interlachen Country Club on this project. Truman Howell Truman Howell Architects & Associates, Inc. 17815 Hutchins Drive, Minnetonka, MN P 952 - 401-7889 F 952-401 -7918 E architects @th- arch.com PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 14 of 22 Commissioner75tau \ on asked Mr. K n and Mr. Teague to "sand- paper" the recommen on an" their discretion place the proposed amendment language-in-the 'on of 850 they see fit. Ayes, S erer; Schroeder, Staunton, iel, Forrest, Fischer. Nays, er, Carpenter. Motion carried. 2008- 0013.09b Conditional Use Permit Interlachen Country Club 6200 Interlachen Boulevard, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Interlachen Country Club is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand a parking lot. The expanded parking lot is for a new maintenance building for the Interlachen Country Club at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard. Maintenance buildings are a permitted accessory use not a conditional use. Because the need for the parking lot is intertwined with the maintenance building, the maintenance building will also be addressed. Planner Teague explained the applicant originally proposed a similar parking lot with a maintenance facility at the end of Belmore Lane. Those plans were reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 1, 2008 and January 28, 2009. Based on the direction from the Planning Commission on January 28th, the appliicant has revised the plans to locate the building on what was referred to as the "chicken farm site" south of the originally proposed site. The size of the main building has been reduced from 20,000 square feet, and the building redesigned to match the existing club house. The applicant is no longer requesting a Vacation of a portion of Belmore Lane, or a lot division. Planner Teague pointed out the new parking lot would be located on. the east side of a new 16,440 square foot maintenance facility, and on the west side of a 1,840 square foot "caddy lounge' addition to the exisitng cart storage building. This existing building would be remodeled to match the proposed new building. To accommodate the request, two existing single - family homes and the existing maintenance building would be removed. The proposed site is currently used as a staging area and storage of materials by the maintenance crew. Continuing, Planner Teague explained that access to the new maintenance building would be from an existing interior road off Interlachen Boulevard and Waterman Avenue. There would be no access off Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. A future "short course' would be located to the north of the proposed PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 15 of 22 builidng. Practice facilities accessory to a golf course are a permitted accessory use, and would not be subject to a conditional use permit. Also, there are inconsistencies in the zoning ordinance in regard to regulation of accessory buildings in the R -1 Zoning District. The following summarizes the inconsistencies: 1. Lots 9,000 square feet and larger are limited to 1,000 square feet of accessory buildings. 2. Lots less than 9,000 square feet have no limit on the size of accessory buildings. 3. Lots with single - dwelling unit buildings are limited to no more than 1,000 square feet. 4. Maintenance buildings are a permitted accessory use to a golf course with no size limitation mentioned in the regulation. The intent of the ordinance is to limit single - dwelling unit buildings to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. However, provision #1 technically prohibits all R -1 property, including schools and golf courses to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. This provision has not been enforced on conditionally permitted uses such as golf courses and schools. Over the years, Edina Schools, Braemar and the Edina Country Club have constructed a number of accessory buildings that far exceed 1,000 square feet on their sites. The following list demonstrates the number of accessory buildings on R -1 sites that exceed 1,000 square feet: Planner Teague stated staff believes the proposal is reasonable for five reasons: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. 2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. The use is considered a permitted accessory use in the R -1 Zoning District; expansions of parking lots are a conditionally permitted uses. All setback requirements would be met. The intent of the R -1 Zoning District is to limit the size of accessory buildings on lots with single - family homes, and not on lots with conditionally permitted uses. As demonstrated on pages 2 -3 of this report, the City has not enforced 1,000 square foot accessory building limit on golf courses or schools. 3. The maintenance buildings would be well screened from adjacent properties, by a six -foot tall wood fence and existing and proposed trees. The nearest home on Kresse Circle is 114 feet. Other nearby homes would be 174 and 132 feet away. Most of the parking for the facility would be within the existing parking lot for Interlachen, therefore, car lights would not be an issue. The nearest home on the south side of Belmore Lane would be 310 feet from the maintenance building. A large wetland and PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 16 of 22 existing and proposed trees adjacent to the wetland that would remain would separate this home. 4. Improved quality of the wetlands. A series of four filtration basins would be created to filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. This would be an improvement over the current condition of drainage from the site going directly to the wetlands. Also, the existing maintenance building located south of the south pond would be removed and replaced with natural vegetation. The maintenance building is setback just 15 feet from the wetland. These changes would also have a positive impact to the wetland. 5. Emergency vehicles can access the site without any additional access. As previously mentioned, emergency vehicles can access the new building through the existing parking lot, and would not require an additional access, as was previously required with the site off Belmore Lane. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build a new parking lot at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for the Interlachen Country Club based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The maintenance facility is a permitted accessory use. Associated uses proposed for these facilities are typical of a state -of -the art golf course country club. 4. The parking area and maintenance building would be well screened from adjacent properties by a six -foot tall wood fence and existing and proposed trees. 5. There would be an improvement to the quality of the existing wetlands, by removing the existing maintenance building that is located 15 feet from a wetland and by the construction of stormwater retention ponds that would filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. 6. The buildings would be constructed to match the existing clubhouse. Planner Teague added approval is also subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2009. • Grading & drainage plans date stamped April 24, 2009. • Utility plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Landscape plan date stamped May 14, 2009. • Lighting plan date stamped April 24, 2009. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 17 of 22 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City will require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3. These lots must be combined with the golf course lot prior to issuance of a building permit 4. Access to the buildings shall be from the internal access points from Waterman Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, and not Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. 5. Maloney Avenue and Belmore Lane may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. 6. The buildings must meet all applicable building permit requirements. 7. All conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2009. Appearing for the Applicant Lyle Ward, Craig Christensen and Matt Rostel, Intedachen Country Club (ICC) Applicant Presentation Mr. Ward addressed the Commission and explained he would like to re -visit some of the facts he presented previously on ICC. Mr. Ward said ICC was founded in 1909 and at that time the area was farmland. Mr. Ward said ICC consists of 700 families with 400 of those families Edina residents. Mr. Ward reminded the Commission ICC has appeared before them twice and was given development suggestions by both the Commission and neighbors on where to locate the maintenance facilities. Mr. Ward stressed how critical it is for the Club to update their current maintenance facilities for the care and safety of their employees. Continuing, Mr. Ward pointed out many factors must be considered when designing maintenance buildings, adding all maintenance buildings must be designed to meet OSHA standards. Mr. Ward said the subject site was once a chicken processing facility and in the late 1960's the Club purchased it. Mr. Ward stated it is important to note that this area was never used as residential property. It was always industrial. Mr. Ward stated he believes the Club should have the ability to build a modern, safe and appropriate maintenance facility. Concluding, Mr. Ward stated in his opinion to suggest that the requested Conditional Use Permit only benefits ICC is not true. Mr. Ward said ICC has always been a good citizen. Golf Championships have been held at the Club bringing money into the community. Continuing, Mr. Ward pointed out neighborhoods developed around the Club and fairways, not the other way around, which makes it very difficult to add buildings to the course. Mr. Ward said he feels very strongly that Interlachen Country Club is one of the finest golf courses in the country which benefits not only Edina but the immediate neighbors. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 18 of 22 Mr. Christensen addressed the Commission and with pictures indicated the revised location of the proposed maintenance buildings. Mr. Christensen noted that neighbors have expressed concern over noise levels, however, he believes that the buildings design with the doors facing the Club would reduce noise impact. Mr. Christensen said he also believes the noise coming from lawn machinery would not exceed noise limit standards. Concluding, Mr. Christensen said if a fence is added the fence would also reduce noise and visibility. Commissioner Brown said if he understands correctly this proposal eliminates access to the neighborhood, relocates the doors on the maintenance buildings to face the club house, reduces the size of the building(s), and modifies the exterior building materials to match the existing club house. Mr. Christensen responded that is correct. Public Testimon Melissa Franzen, 6216 Maloney Avenue, told the Commission she is present in opposition to ICC's request for a CUP. Ms. Franzen stated she resides 141 feet from the ICC property and first heard of the change in building location when a CUP sign was posted in her neighborhood. Ms. Franzen said in her opinion this request shouldn't even be heard this evening. The proposed maintenance buildings exceed 1,000 square feet, therefore, require a variance hearing, not CUP. Continuing, Ms. Franzen said only yesterday did the Kresse /Maloney neighbors meet with representatives from ICC to discuss the change in location for the proposed maintenance buildings. Jane Clifford, 421 Kresse Circle, told the Commission Interlachen Country Club has been a good neighbor, adding ICC invited her to a number of meetings on the proposed maintenance facilities, but at that time those meetings concerned the Belmore Lane.location. Continuing, Ms: Clifford commented when the Belmore location was found to be "unpopular' it appears this location was chosen. Concluding, Ms. Clifford said she believes residents of the Maloney /Kresse neighborhood would be compromised as a result of this change. Mr. Tinkman, 417 Kresse, referred to previous Planning Commission minutes and read comments from Commissioners. Melanie Tinkman, 417 Kressee Circle, told the Commission her neighborhood was expecting the development of a short game course in the area commonly referred to as the "chicken farm ", not maintenance buildings. Ms. Tinkman asked the Commission to take the same care of the Maloney /Kresse residents as they did the Belmore residents. Susan Simonton, 6229 Maloney Avenue stated in her opinion the proposed maintenance building is too large and something must be done to reduce its size. PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 19 of 22 John King, 413 Kresse Circle, explained he has owned three homes in Edina and he chose this home because of its seclusion. Mr. King acknowledged he is a member of Interlachen Country Club but feels the proposed location of the larger maintenance building will "lock out' Kresse Circle. Mr. King stated the neighborhood has always enjoyed a wonderful relationship with ICC and would like to keep it that way. A realtor commented that in her opinion no matter where the maintenance buildings are located (either the Belmore or Kresse sites) property values would be negatively impacted. Frank Thomas, 505 John Street, informed Commissioners he worries about the potential for noise spillover that could occur as a result of the proposed location of the new maintenance facilities. Mr. Thomas stated he does agree with Club representatives that a new maintenance facility is needed ; however, he would like to work more closely with the Club and try to find a way to minimize the buildings impact (move it over a bit more). Nathan Franzen, 6216 Maloney Avenue, addressed the Commission and informed them the neighbors met with members of ICC and suggested the following: • Rebuild the existing maintenance building exactly where it is and provide underground cart storage — the new building would be between 6,000 - 9,000 square feet; and • Rebuild the existing maintenance building along the first fairway (east of the chicken farm) and develop the short course as previously planned. Commissioner Brown moved to close public testimony. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Public hearing closed. Comments and Questions from the Commission Commissioner Scherer asked the applicants to describe the exterior building materials. Mr. Howell explained (displaying the materials board) that the materials will consist of a metal roof, stucco siding with brown accent trim (to match Club House) window trim and an exterior brown metal base along the wall. Commissioner Carpenter said he struggles with the Conditional Use Permit in relationship to the discussion on the proposed maintenance buildings when the CUP is only for the parking lot. Commissioner Carpenter questioned if the Commission is exceeding their bonds. Mr. Knutson agreed, adding it is hard to ignore the fact that the two are connected. Commissioner Forrest asked for clarification on the size of the proposed maintenance buildings. Mr. Howell responded the maintenance building is PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 20 of 22 proposed at 16,000 square feet and the caddy shack is roughly 1,840 square feet. Commission Action Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend .Conditional Use Permit approval based on'staff findings 1 through 6 and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Commissioner Grabiel said ICC has .responded to recommendations from both the Commission andBelmore neighbors and it is unfortunate that it appears one block is pitted against another. Continuing, Commissioner Grabiel, stated he supports the revised Conditional Use Permit based on the "following' • The removal of buckthorn and the clearing of the area is good for the Club and .neighborhood. • The Club has demonstrated the necessity for new maintenance facilities • The Conditional' Use Permit request is consistent with Code • Maintenance buildings have consistently been supported by „parking spaces • The proposal as presented enhances the. site • There is a benefit to the community to haveanterlachen ,Country Club in Edina • The job of the Planning Commission is to look at the community as a whole Commissioner Brown said he concurs with Commissioner Grabiel adding Interlachen Country Club has demonstrated over the past months that they studied other locations and .limited their options to two locations (Belmore and the subject site). Commissioner Brown said it.also should tie noted that employee safety is important and it needed to be addressed. Commissioner Brown concluded in his opinion the Club has done; a good job. responding to concerns of neighbors and Commissioners, adding he supports.,their effort. Chair Fischer said in looking back over the last months the Club has responded favorably to suggestions from both the Commission and neighbors. Chair Fischer noted the maintenance buildings have been relocated, the exterior materials were changed to match the Club House, doors were relocated to minimize noise impact, and the buildings were, reduced in size. Chair Fischer acknowledged the. process has been long and it hasn't been easy. Commissioner Staunton said he agrees with much of what has. been said, pointing out there really weren't many viable options available to the,Club-to build the maintenance buildings. Commissioner Staunton said in his opinion screening needs further attention and the timing of this request did seem a bit fast, PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 21 of 22 questioning if there would be any value in continuing this to the next meeting of the Commission. Commissioner Schroeder said he agrees that more could be done to adequately screen the buildings. Commissioner Schroeder offer an amendment to the motion: ICC is to demonstrate landscaping strategies to more fully screen the proposed maintenance buildings prior to review by the City Council. A discussion ensued on the prospect of tabling the request to allow more time for the applicant. to revise the landscaping, and for neighbors to meet with the Club. Commissioners did acknowledge that this has been very long process; however, some Commissioners felt there was a lack of communication between the Club and the Kresse neighborhood. Others felt that neighborhoods respond when they are immediately impacted and the proper process was followed. Chair Fischer asked Commissioner Grabiel and Brown if they would accept Commissioner Schroeder's amendment. Commissioners Grabiel and Brown accepted the amendment. Chair Fischer called for the vote. Ayes; Carpenter, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, Risser, Fischer. Nay, Scherer. Motion carried. No further public apmment. IV. Commissioners expressed the opinion that the May 13, 2009, Planning Commission Work Sessi n went�very well and the developers present shared very valuable information ith the Commission.. a Chair Fischer Commissioner Risser informe f. Environment Commission will Chair Fischer note /that the Plani Session will be het on June 10th. Commission arevthe guests. pt of the Council Connection. Commission that on May 19th the Energy and a joint meeting with the Edina City Council. ng Commission Ordinance Re -Write Work Members of The Energy and Environment PC Meeting May 27, 2009 Page 22 of 22 Commissioner Carpenter said he is still working on by -laws for the Commission and will let Commissioners know when he has a draft ready for their review. VI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Carpenter moved for adjournment at 11:30 pm. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Submitted by 6RAC-MAR MbI+3TEP4,NCe gwLwJ65 r iw^ P •f ' ` A nT �� Nti r.. � �•�. •yam � � . � ak, � ,r a .� � r n .prl • � A�f FT l P1v jpwwAT S�o ��� 2. — M �►,ie r S � �- �.. 11 OL ker fooft,5 lvvlc� foow� S6o Coy Oil Chq� cs r��ha�r rtpM�� S S}or�9e bf P�t oc , P 3 Coil Si bflt9t J 610'PMCA� + Mec "111( b%%-/S tOf 'AfIf re Pf"S, T SAnA ani 9raJe' Sto(a,e City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoni 850.03 detract from the provisions of this Section. Any use not specifically allowed by this Section in a district as a principal, accessory or conditional use, shall not be allowed or permitted in that district by implication, interpretation or other construction of, or meaning given to, the wording of this Section. ubd. 37 Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, as used herein, have o lowing meanings: Accessory Building. A separate building or structure or a portion of a principal building or structure used for accessory uses. Accessory Use. A use allowed by this Section which is subordinate to the principal use in terms of purpose, scope and extent and is located on the same lot as the principal use. Adult Body Painting Studio. An establishment or business which provides the service of applying paint or other substance, whether transparent or non - transparent, to or on the body of a patron when such body is wholly or partially nude in terms of Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Bookstore. An establishment or business which barters, rents or sells items consisting of printed matter, pictures, slides, records, audio tape, videotape, or motion picture film and either alone or when combined with Adult Motion Picture Rental or Sales and Adult Novelty Sales within the same business premises has either 10 percent or more of its stock in trade or 10 percent or more of its floor area containing items which are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on the depiction or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Cabaret. An establishment or business which provides dancing or other live entertainment, if such dancing or other live entertainment is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Companionship Establishment. An establishment or business which provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk or discussion between an employee of the establishment and a customer, if such service is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Conversation/Rap Parlor. An establishment or business which provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or discussion, if such service is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Health /Sport Club. An establishment or business which �::;: u:::;s minors by reason of age and is distincniishPa actecized by an emphasis on Specified Sexi:a? Acd;i lldk;�, vi. Specified Anatomical Areas. Adult Hotel or Motel. A hotel or motel from which minors are specifically excluded from patronage and wherein material is presented which is distinguished 850 -5 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zonin 850.07 state that the design of the building and site has been prepared under the direct supervision of the architect. Subd. 9 Building Coverage Computations; Exclusions and Inclusions. A The following structures and improvements shall be excluded when computing uilding coverage: 1. Driveways and sidewalks, but not patios. 2. Parking lots and parking ramps. 3. Accessory recreational facilities not enclosed by solid walls and not covered by a roof, including outdoor swimming pools, tennis courts and shuffleboard courts; but facilities which are constructed above grade, such as paddle tennis courts, shall be included when computing building coverage. 4. Unenclosed and uncovered steps and stoops less than 50 square feet. 5. Overhanging eaves and roof projections not supported by posts or pillars. OB Building coverage computations, however, shall include all other principal or cessory buildings, including, but not limited to: 1. Decks and patios subject to allowances provided by this Section. 2. Gazebos. 3. Balconies. 4. Breezeways. 5. Porches. 6. Accessory recreational facilities constructed above grade, such as paddle tennis courts. Subd. 10 Lighting. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than three foot - candles measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and ten foot - candles measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned non - residential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. Subd. 11 Frontage of Lots on a Street. All lots shall have at least 30 feet of frontage on at least one street other than alleys or limited access roadways to which private access is prohibited. Private easements shall not be considered as frontage for purposes of this Subdivision. Notwithstanding the requirements of this subdivision, lots in a townhouse plat 850 -44 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina R_ 1 0 1-1 �4 Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.11 other arch -type roof, to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof, or to the top of a cornice of a hip roof. 4. Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then for setback purposes the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 5. Rear Yard Setback - Corner Lots Required to Maintain Two Front Street Setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a comer lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the. lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. 6. Through Lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. 7. Accessory Buildings and Structures Used for Dwelling Purposes. Subject to the requirements of paragraph B. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850. 11, if any accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), or if any addition to or expansion of (including, without limitation, an additional story on) an accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), is used or intended for use, in whole or in part, for residential occupancy, then such accessory building or structure or such addition or expansion, shall comply with all of the minimum setback requirements for a single dwelling unit building. B. One Dwelling Unit Per Single Dwelling Unit Lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to Section 810 of this Code. C Decks and Patios. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 850.07, the irst 150 square feet of an unenclosed deck or patio shall not be included when computing building coverage. D. Basements. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for purposes of this paragraph. E. Minimum Building Width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a single dwelling unit building shall measure less than 18 feet in width as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. 850 -70 Supplement 2008 -01 N D 4A ct City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo ' g 850.12 including, but not limited to, driveways, sidewalks, flagpoles and clotheslines. F. Customary home occupations. Subd. 3 Requirements for Lot Areas and Dimensions. A. Minimum Lot Area (per double dwelling 15,000 sq. ft. unit building B. Minimum Lot Width 90 ft. Subd. 4 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. 6 Maximum Building Coverage 25% B. Setbacks (subject to the provisions of paragraph D. of Subd. 5 of this Subsection 850.12 1. Principal Use Buildings: Front street setback 30 ft. Side street setback 15 ft. Interior side yard setback 10 ft. Rear yard setback 35 ft. 2. Accessory Buildings and Structures. Setbacks for accessory buildings and structures shall be the same as those required by this Section for building and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings in the R -1 District. C. Height: 2' /z stories or 30 feet, whichever is less. Subd. 5 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Application of Requirements. Requirements for lot area and dimensions, building coverage, setbacks and height shall be applied to the entire double dwelling unit building and the entire lot, and shall ignore any subdivision of building and lot which has been or may be made in order to convey each dwelling unit separately. B. Sewer and Water Connections. Each dwelling unit must be separately and independently connected to public sanitary sewer and water mains or shall have been granted a waiver thereof in accordance with Section 445 of this Code C. Subdivided R -2 Lots. A double dwelling unit building and lot may be subdivided pursuant to Section 810 of this Code along the common party walls between the dwelling units, provided that: 1. A building permit has been issued and the building foundation is in place; 2. Each parcel resulting from the subdivision must have frontage on a 850 -72 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zonin 850.13 principal building or otherwise completely underground. (No more than 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit shall be counted)., b. subtract 500 square feet for each dwelling unit if all principal buildings conform to all specifications of Type I or II construction as defined in the State Building Code as adopted by Section 410 of this Code. c. subtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if at least a 500 foot spacing is maintained between each principal and accessory building and the nearest lot line of a lot in the R -1 District used for residential purposes. d. add 500 square feet for each bedroom in excess of two in any one dwelling unit. e ubtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if the tract is within 2. 00 feet of an accessible freeway interchange (nearest lot line to center of interchange). 2. PRD -4 a. all allowances permitted by paragraph B.1 of this Subd. 4 for PRD -3. b. subtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if the tract is three acres or more in area. c. subtract 250 square feet for each dwellin unit if total building coverage is less than ten percent. 3. PSR -3 and PSR -4 a. all allowances permitted by paragraph B.2 of this Subd. 4 for PRD -4. b. subtract 1,000 square feet for each senior citizen dwelling unit. Subd. 5 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, Height. A. aximum Building Coverage and FAR. Maximum FAR Building Coverage PRD - 1 25% -- PRD -2 25% -- PRD - 3 30% -- PRD - 4 30% -- 850 -75 Supplement 2007 -06 I R City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo C85O.13 PRD - 5 35% 1.2 PSR - 3 30% -- PSR - 4 35% 1.2 B. Setbacks. 1. Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract. The required setbacks shall be increased to equal the building height for those buildings whose height. exceeds the minimum setbacks required. a. minimum setbacks are as follows: Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard PRD - 1 30' 30' 20' 25' PRD - 2 30' 30' 20' 35' PRD- - 3 35' 35' 20' 35' PRD - 4,5 35' 35' 35' 35' PSR - 3,4 35' 35' 20' 35' Accessory Buildings Same as 10' 10' principal building C. Maximum Building Height. PRD - 1, 2 21/2 stories or 30 feet, whichever is less PRD - 3 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less PRD - 4,5 No maximum; height is determined by required setbacks. PSR - 3 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less. PSR - 4 No maximum; height is determined by required setbacks. Subd. 6 Usable Lot Area. Usable lot area not less than the amount specified below shall be provided on the tract. This space must be easily accessible by residents of the principal building. The front yard and side yard established by the required front street or side street setback and areas occupied by driveways, parking areas and buildings shall not be included as usable lot area. Areas within the tract and dedicated by the tract owner to the general public shall be included in usable lot area computations. 850 -76 Supplement 2007 -06 ODD 014fict City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo ' 850.1 Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. (prMaximum Building Coverage. 30 percent of the tract. Publicly owned buildings structures shall be excluded from building coverage computations. B. Maximum Floor Area Ratio. Non - residential uses shall not exceed a FAR of 0.5. Non - residential uses and residential uses in the aggregate shall not exceed an FAR of 1.0. Tract area shall include all area in the approved Overall Development Plan, exclusive of public street rights -of -way. Publicly owned buildings or structures shall be excluded from FAR computations. C. Setbacks. Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract or from public street right -of -way. The minimum building setback shall be increased by '/z foot for each foot the building height exceeds the minimum required setback, provided, however, the required interior side yard setback shall not be less than 35 feet if the boundary of the tract adjoins land zoned and used for residential purposes. D. Maximum Building Height. MDD -3 3 stories or 40 ft. whichever is less MDD -4 4 stories or 50 ft. whichever is less MDD -5 No maximum, height determined by required setbacks MDD -6 No maximum, height determined by required setbacks Subd. 7 Usable Lot Area. Usable lot area not less than the amount specified below. shall be provided on the tract. Publicly owned or operated civic, cultural or recreational facilities located on the tract may be counted as usable lot area. The front yard and side yard established by the required front street or side street setback and areas occupied by driveways, parking areas and garages shall not be counted as usable lot area. ' Per Dwelling Unit MDD -3 400 sq. ft. MDD -4 400 sq. ft. MDD -5 200 sq. ft. MDD -6 200 sq. ft. Subd. 8 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in 850 -81 Supplement 2008 -01 Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard MDD -3 35' 35' 20' 35' MDD -4 35' 35' 35' 35' MDD -5 50' 50' 50' 50' MDD -6 35' 35' 20' 35' The minimum building setback shall be increased by '/z foot for each foot the building height exceeds the minimum required setback, provided, however, the required interior side yard setback shall not be less than 35 feet if the boundary of the tract adjoins land zoned and used for residential purposes. D. Maximum Building Height. MDD -3 3 stories or 40 ft. whichever is less MDD -4 4 stories or 50 ft. whichever is less MDD -5 No maximum, height determined by required setbacks MDD -6 No maximum, height determined by required setbacks Subd. 7 Usable Lot Area. Usable lot area not less than the amount specified below. shall be provided on the tract. Publicly owned or operated civic, cultural or recreational facilities located on the tract may be counted as usable lot area. The front yard and side yard established by the required front street or side street setback and areas occupied by driveways, parking areas and garages shall not be counted as usable lot area. ' Per Dwelling Unit MDD -3 400 sq. ft. MDD -4 400 sq. ft. MDD -5 200 sq. ft. MDD -6 200 sq. ft. Subd. 8 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in 850 -81 Supplement 2008 -01 POND City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.15 D. Clubs, lodge halls and non - profit organizations, excluding those providing food or beverage services in the building or on the lot. E. Facilities for athletic, health or weight control purposes, including, but not limited to, handball, racquetball, tennis, reducing salons and aerobic dance studios, provided that no seating or other facilities shall be allowed for spectator usage. F. Medical and dental offices and clinics. G. Employment agencies. H. Travel bureaus. I. Day care. J. Public or private colleges, universities or schools. Subd. 3 Conditional Uses. A. Funeral Homes and Mortuaries Subd. 4 Accessory Uses. A. Off - street parking facilities. B. In buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more, ten percent of the gross floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 District and PCD -2 District, provided that the accessory uses are accessible only from the interior of the principal building and have no signs or displays relative thereto visible from the outside of the principal building. Subd. 5 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Maximum Building Coverage: 30 percent of the tract. B. Maximum Floor Area Ratio: 0.5 of the tract. C. Setbacks - shall be measured from the boundary of the tract: Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 35'* 35'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. D. Maximum Building Height. POD -1 4 stories or 50 feet whichever is less g, POD -2 no maximum; height is determined by required setbacks Subd. 6 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply: 850 -83 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and, Zonin 850.16 automobile agency. Offices accessory to an allowed principal use. Subd. 10. Accessory Uses in PCD -4. Accessory car washes. Retail sales of convenience goods. Gasoline sales accessory"io a car wash. Subd. 11. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Maximum Floor Area .Ratio (subject to the requirements of Subd. 12 of this bsection) PCD -1 1.0 of.the tract PCD -2 1.5 of the tract PCD -3 i) North of West.70'h Street: 1.0 of the tract provided that non - residential uses may not exceed 0.75. ii) South. of West 70' Street: 0.5 of the tract. PCD -4 0.3 of the 'tract B. Setbacks (Subject to the requirements of paragraphs A. and B. of Subd. 11 of this Subsection). Front Side Side Rear Yard Yard Yard Yard PCD -1 35'* 25' * 25'* 25'* PCD -2 35'* 259* 259* 25'* PCD -3 North of 70'h St 35' ** 35' ** 35' ** •35' ** South of 70t St. 50 ** 50 ** 50 ** 50 ** PCD -4 35' 25' 25' 25' Gas Stations All other uses 45' 25' 45' 25' * or the building height if greater ** Subject to the requirements of Subd. 12 ofthis Subsection. C. Maximum Building Height. PCD -1 Two stories PCD -2 Four stories or 50 feet whichever is less PCD -3 Maximum height is determined by Paragraphs C and D of Subd: 12 of this Subsection. PCD -4 One story Subd. 12. Special Requirements. In addition to. the general requirements described in 850 -90 Supplement 2007 -06 P►n d►s����� City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zo ' 850.17 contiguous to other land in the Planned Industrial District. B. Minimum Lot Area. Two acres. C. Minimum Building Area. Each building shall have a gross floor area of not less than 10,000 square feet. OD- Maximum Building Coverage. 1. Lots of less than three acres: 30 percent. 2. Lots of three acres or more: 45 percent. a. may be increased to 60 percent if the total gross floor area on the lot is contained within a single building and all portions of any loading docks and berths are completely enclosed within the same single building. E. Maximum FAR: 0.5 1. May be increased to 0.6 for buildings which qualify for 60 percent building coverage as provided in paragraph D of Subd. 3 of this Subsection 850.17. F. Setbacks. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 50'* 50'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. G. Maximum Building Height. Four stories or 50 feet whichever is less. Subd. 4 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply: A. Increased Front Street and Side Street Setbacks. The minimum setback from a street shall be increased to 75 feet if the tract is located across the street from property in a residential district used for residential purposes. B. Increased Side Yard and Rear Yard Setbacks. The minimum setback from an interior lot line shall be increased to 100 feet if the lot line adjoins property in a residential district used for residential purposes. C. Temporary Retail Sales and Going out of Business Sales Permits. 1. The Manager may grant a permit for a temporary retail sale or going out of business sale, if: a. the temporary retail sale shall not exceed three consecutive days, and the going out of business sale shall not exceed ten consecutive days; b. not more than two temporary retail sale permits may be issued to any one person, firm, affiliate, subsidiary or building in a calendar year, and further provided that the two permitted sales must occur at least 60 days apart. Not more than one going out of business sale 850 -97 Supplement 2007 -06 City of Edina A. Hospitals. ►S1fjcf Land Use, Platting and Zonid 850.18 B. Medical and dental offices and clinics. C. Laboratories for performing medical or dental research, diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical work, having a direct relationship to the providing of health services, including, but not limited to, medical research, radiology, hematology, serology, immunology, allergy, biochemistry, basal metabolism, microbiology, parasitology, pathology, histology, cytology, toxicology and pharmacology. Laboratories engaged in the production or manufacture of goods or products for commercial sale or distribution shall not be considered laboratories within the meaning and intent of this paragraph. Subd. 2 Accessory Uses. A. Living quarters and recreational and educational facilities for nurses, interns, staff members, hospital employees and volunteers, if the uses are located within or are contiguous to the principal building. B. Off - street parking facilities for ambulances, service trucks and automobiles owned by tenants, employees, patients and visitors. C. Within principal buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more, ten percent of the floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 and PCD -2 subdistricts, if the primary function of the uses is to serve the needs of occupants of, and visitors to, the principal use. D. Helistops for use by helicopters involved in emergency rescue operations. Subd. 3 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. AR: 1.0. B. Setbacks. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 35'* 35'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. C. Building Height. No maximum; height is determined by required setbacks. �e'=TmDuistrict Tract Area. No tract of land shall be transferred to the Regional unless the tract measures at least ten acres in area or is contiguous to other land in the Regional Medical District. Subd. 4 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. All uses shall conform to the same requirements as are established by this Section for the Planned Office District (POD). B. All uses shall comply with the same standards for residual features as are established by this Section for the Planned Industrial District (PID) 850 -101 Supplement 2007 -06 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 27, 2009 2008- 013.09b Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Interlachen Country Club is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand a parking lot. The expanded parking lot is for a new maintenance building for the Interlachen Country Club at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard. (See location maps on pages Al —A3.) Maintenance buildings are a permitted accessory use not a conditional use. Because the need for the parking lot is intertwined with the maintenance building, the maintenance building will also be addressed. The applicant originally proposed a similar parking lot with a maintenance facility at the end of Belmore Lane. Those plans were reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 1, 2008 and January 28, 2009. (See minutes from those meetings on pages A55 —A72.) Based on the direction from the Planning Commission on January 28th, the appliicant has revised the plans to locate the building on what was referred to as the "chicken farm site" south of the originally proposed site. The size of the main building has been reduced from 20,000 square feet, and the building redesigned to match the existing club house. The applicant is no longer requesting a Vacation of a portion of Belmore Lane, or a lot division. The new parking lot would be located on the east side of a new 16,440 square foot maintenance facility, and on the west side of a 1,840 square foot "caddy lounge addition to the exisitng cart storage building. This existing building would be remodeled to match the proposed new building. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 —A24, and in the attached development plan book and building elevations.) To accommodate the request, two existing single - family homes and the existing maintenance building would be removed. (See building removal plan on page A5 —A7.) The proposed site is, currently used as a staging area and storage of materials by the maintenance crew. (See pictures on pages A25 —A34.) Access to the new maintenance building would be from an existing interior road off Interlachen Boulevard and Waterman Avenue. (See page Al.) There would be no access off Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. A future "short course" would be located to the north of the proposed builidng. (See page A13.) Practice facilities accessory to a golf course are a permitted accessory use, and would not be subject to a conditional use permit. Also, there are inconsistencies in the zoning ordinance in regard to regulation of accessory buildings in the R -1 Zoning District. The following summarizes the inconsistencies: 1. Lots 9,000 square feet and larger are limited to 1,000 square feet of accessory buildings. 2. Lots less than 9,000 square feet have no limit on the size of accessory buildings. 3. Lots with single - dwelling unit buildings are limited to no more than 1,000 square.feet. 4. Maintenance buildings are a permitted accessory use to a golf course with no size limitation mentioned in the regulation. The intent of the ordinance is to limit single - dwelling unit buildings to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. However, provision #1 technically prohibits all R -1 property, including schools and golf courses to no more than 1,000 square feet of accessory structures. This provision has not been enforced on conditionally permitted uses such as golf courses and schools. Over the years, Edina Schools, Braemar and the Edina Country Club have constructed a number of accessory buildings that far exceed 1,000 square feet on their sites. The following list demonstrates the number of accessory buildings on R -1 sites that exceed 1,000 square feet: Braemar * 17,200 square feet of maintenance buildings. * 30,000 square foot golf dome. * 40,000 square foot ice rink. * 25,000 square foot ice rink. * 28,750 square foot ice rink (93,000 square foot total ice rink facility. * 35,760 square foot police /fire training facilities Edina Country Club * 2,500 square foot tennis court building. * 2,800 square foot pool building. * 8,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. 2 Edina Community Center'Site * 4,000 square foot maintenance /storage buildings Cornelia Interlachen * 2,440 square feet of maintenance /storage buildings. *13,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. * 6,500 square feet of other accessory buildings. No variances have been required for accessory buildings over, 1,000 square feet on any of these sites and several have been constructed since the ordinance establishing the 1,000 square foot limitation was adopted in 1992. Staff is therefore, proposing an ordinance amendment to revise the ordinance to eliminate the 1,000 square foot limitation for lots over 9,000 square feet, which would lift the 1,000 square feet accessory building limitation on conditionally permitted uses. Therefore, no variance would be necessary. However, if the Planning Commission and City Council does not agree with the code change, then a Variance request would have to be heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals. A letter has been submitted on behalf of the Three Circles Neighborhood requesting that the planning commission deny the proposal. (See letter attached to the back of this report.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single- family homes; zoned and guided low- density residential. Easterly: Interlachen Country Club golf course. Southerly: Interlachen Country Club tennis courts, maintenance building, club house and parking lot. Westerly: Single- family homes; zoned and guided low- density residential. Existing Site Features The site exists today with a single - family home, used by the club's superintendent, and as a staging area and dumping ground for material used on the golf course. There is a tall berm that would be removed for the new building. The site contains portions of two wetlands and mature trees along the west side. (See pages Al —A3.) 3 Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Conditional Use Permit Quasi - Public R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District Per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, the City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare; The enhancement to the public welfare in this instance would be the greater protection of the two wetlands located on the site. Stormwater retention ponds would be constructed to filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. Additionally, the existing maintenance building, which is setback just 15 feet from the southerly wetland, would be removed, and the area restored with vegetation per the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. These conditions would help to improve the water quality of the wetlands. The required wetland setback for structures is 50 feet. The new parking lot and accessory building would not be detrimental to the site, or endanger the public health, safety, morals or general welfare. The buildings would be partially screened by existing and proposed landscaping, and by a 6 -foot wood fence. (See landscape plans on pages A9 —A10.) The site has been, and would continue to be used by the maintenance crew for the golf course. Noise from the building would be directed toward the golf course, with the openings to the building facing the course. Access to the site would be through the main parking lot. There would be no access off Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. The proposed activities are already taking place on this site and at the golf course. By building a new maintenance facilities and other associated uses with this country club, would allow Interlachen to maintain its nationally renowned facility with a state of the art facility for its employees. There is public value in having Interlachen located within the City of Edina. 2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages; There would be no new access off of Belmore Lane or Maloney Avenue; therefore, there would be no increase in traffic to adjacent streets. Main 4 access would continue to be off of Interlachen Boulevard and Waterman Avenue. The use exists on the site today; therefore, no additional trips would be generated to the site. A transportation study was conducted by Spack Consulting as part of the original request, and concluded that the project would not impact adjacent roads. (See pages A38 —A54.) The city engineer, fire chief and fire marshal have all reviewed the plans and found access and truck turning radius to be acceptable. (See their review and comments on pages A36a— A37c.) 3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance; The city assessor has reviewed the proposed plans, and determined that the proposed parking lot and new building would not decrease property values in the area. (See memo from the city assessor on page A37d.) The existing junk and debris on the site would be cleaned up and removed from the site. The use would not cause a nuisance as defined in Edina's nuisance ordinance. The city sanitarian has reviewed the proposed use, and does not find that there would be any nuisances caused by the request. The fire marshal would be aware of all chemicals that are stored within the facility through the building permit review process. This building would be constructed with a sprinkler system, so it is unlikely a serious fire would occur, however, if there is a fire, the fire department would know precisely what is being stored within the building, so they would be able to properly fight the fire. (See memo from the fire marshal on pages A37- A37c.) Per Section 1040.03.B. of the City Code golf course maintenance equipment is exempt from hours of operation requirement. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The parking lot and building would not impede development of property in the area. 5. Will -not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities; The parking lot and building would not generate any additional traffic or increase usage of park or public facilities. Again, there would be no new access off of Belmore Lane or Maloney Avenue; therefore, there would be no increase in traffic to adjacent streets. Main access would continue to be off of Interlachen Boulevard and Waterman Avenue. The use exists on the site today; therefore, no additional trips would be generated to the site. A transportation study was conducted by Spack Consulting as part of the 5 original request, and concluded that the project would not impact adjacent roads. (See pages A38 —A54.) 6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and As demonstrated in the compliance table on the following page, the proposal meets all other Zoning Ordinance requirements. 7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed parking lot is a conditionally permitted use, and the maintenance building is a permitted accessory use in the R -1, zoning district. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Building Design As shown on the attached building elevations, the building would be designed to generally match the existing clubhouse. The building would be stucco and ribbed steel. (See elevations on pages Al 5-A22, and the attached colored renderings.) The city's building official has reviewed the plans and indicated that buildings 2,000 square feet and over must be built with a sprinkler system. The applicant will have a materials sample board at the meeting. Grading & Drainage The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans, and site plan and finds them acceptable. (See page A36a.) A more detailed review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is required. Any conditions that the Watershed District may place on the plans would also be required. As mentioned, four drainage ponds would be created to filter out sediment. before draining into the wetlands. This would be an improvement over the current condition of drainage from the site going directly to the wetlands. In particular, this would significantly improve the condition of the southerly pond. (See existing conditions on pages A25, A26 and A31.) Emergency Vehicle Access The city engineer, fire marshal and fire chief have reviewed the proposed plans, and had determined that emergency vehicles such as fire trucks could easily access the new building through the existing parking lot. Therefore, no emergency access off adjacent streets would be required with this proposal. (See review and comments on pages A36a— A37c,) 0 Landscaping /Screening Based on staff recommendation, the applicant has revised the landscape plan to add additional tree along the north and west side of the building to provide screening of the building from adjacent residential property. Twenty, 10 -foot Norway Spruce trees would be planted, along with Oaks and American Larch trees in this area. (See plans on page A9.) Also to assist in the screening of the building a 6 -foot wood fence would be constructed near the west lot line to provide a low screen of the building. (See building rendering on pages A19- A20.) Lighting Security lighting would be installed around the building. The applicant has submitted a lighting plan, which demonstrates it would meet the City's minimum ordinance standards. The foot - candle readings would be 0 at the adjacent lot lines. The lights would be a shoe -box style and down -cast. (See page A24.) Compliance Table PRIMARY ISSUE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION Is the proposed new building and associated parking lot reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for five reasons: VA City Standard Proposed West lot line 50 feet 85 —110 feet North lot line (Belmore) 50 feet 280 feet East lot line 50 feet 1000+ feet South lot line 50 feet 1000+ feet Wetland Setback 50 feet 50 feet Building Height 40 feet 22 feet (29 feet to the ridge line) PRIMARY ISSUE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION Is the proposed new building and associated parking lot reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for five reasons: VA 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 5 -6 of this report, the seven findings for a conditional use permit would be met. 2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. The use is considered a permitted accessory use in the R -1 Zoning District; expansions of parking lots are a conditionally permitted uses. All setback requirements would be met. (See page 5 of this report.) The intent of the R -1 Zoning District is to limit the size of accessory buildings on lots with single- family homes, and not on lots with conditionally permitted uses. As demonstrated on pages 2 -3 of this report, the City has not enforced 1,000 square foot accessory building limit on golf courses or schools. 3. The maintenance buildings would be well screened from adjacent properties, by a six -foot tall wood fence and existing and proposed trees. (See landscape plan and aerial photograph on pages A2, A3, A9.) The nearest home on Kresse Circle is 114 feet. Other nearby homes would be 174 and 132 feet away. (See page A3.) Most of the parking for the facility would be within the existing parking lot for Interlachen, therefore, car lights would not be an issue. The nearest home on the south side of Belmore Lane would be 310 feet from the maintenance building. A large wetland and existing and proposed trees adjacent to the wetland that would remain would separate this home. 4. Improved quality of the wetlands. A series of four filtration basins would be created to filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. This would be an improvement over the current condition of drainage from the site going directly to the wetlands. (See existing conditions on pages A25, A26 and A31.) Also, the existing maintenance building located south of the south pond would be removed and replaced'with natural vegetation. The maintenance building is setback just 15 feet from the wetland. These changes would also have a positive impact to the wetland. 5. Emergency vehicles can access the site without any additional access. As previously mentioned, emergency vehicles can access the new building through the existing parking lot, and would not require an additional access, as was previously required with the site off Belmore Lane. (See comments from the fire chief and fire marshal on pages A36a— A37c.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build a new parking lot at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for the Interlachen Country Club. E:3 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The maintenance facility is a permitted accessory use. Associated uses proposed for these facilities are typical of a state -of -the art golf course country club. 4. The parking area and maintenance buildings would be well screened from adjacent properties, by a six -foot tall wood fence and existing and proposed trees. 5. There would be an improvement to the quality of the existing wetlands, by removing the existing maintenance building that is located 15 feet from a wetland and by the construction of stormwater retention ponds that would filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. 6. The buildings would be constructed to match the existing clubhouse. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2009. • Grading & drainage plans date stamped April 24, 2009. • Utility plan date stamped April 24, 2009. • Landscape plan date stamped May 14, 2009. • Lighting plan date stamped April 24, 2009. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City will require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3. These lots must be combined with the golf course lot prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Access to the buildings shall be from the internal access points from Waterman Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, and not Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. 0 5. Maloney Avenue and Belmore Lane may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. 6. The buildings must meet all applicable building permit requirements. 7. All conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2009. 10 T>- •.�4 r Tv ji ,,tay i, 20,G City of Edina Planning Deparlm nt 4801 ''!Jest Fiftieth Street Edina,_ fvtiRI, 55424 1r.'. in.er lachan Country Cl ;.rb Eeirr;:, MN Oft icAm *r „ TRUMAN; HOWELL' y AJ "C�17EC ti - ,Fc f� SC)( ., IN C.'iy R Is the Intention of this project to demolish some and upgrade other existing buildings and earthwork on the 3nterlachen Country Club property in addition to the construction of a now maintenance facility. l u'ou l'I demolition and rt;nodeling of existing bui ldings, t.se re.,vor!:ireg of ex ^•Sting ecr•.h forn-is and the introduction of oe °.V 11'ees, shmbs, and green areas as '.dell as the car+struction of ne';: an more functional maintenance facilities lnterlaclen Co )ntrr Club will improve the appearance of its c ^. ri taciliti_s ',chile preserving and improving the views from the surrounding neighbonccod onto the site, Considerable time has been spent in cooperation with the neighbors of the surrounding areas of tl)c' intcrlachen property to accommodate each others need and desires, The tocation;)rvAous °y sugge. :te'd for Erie construction of the maintenance facility has been changed and it is .pr'oposee to be re ocat °d further so�ut'h of the original site. The nevi location is t>etvl°en the ponds and adjacent to the exiting envii onn�r.ntal building ::Itiich will be remodeled-zod mused as an.imporved environmenUil building, The area; ore the lnterlachen property that vai8 be affected tiy' this project will irnarove.prescntly unused and unattended earth .-or: io com�l %ment and becorne a positive extension of rhe,°AI�'tl lcJ fZCIIIGGS. Th° ViE':d t0 Chess he':: :'Uildincts from zldj� cent properties v.'ill be enhanced by landscaping and fen&ig, Traffic to these• new buildings ::ill be lirnitcL to tier, golf cout'sc side of the navel constru6on. Whilc for the :no,.; part not QO.cie:•v'ab'le from oft the course. the new buildings Will be constructFd 'wit J3 SIn'llPar 'Vi�CtO�'icn t�2'JCf i�t t�'I� m -vin ciuc'iousa faC -ity. This project vaherl complete, will bring ;ntcdachen (Country Club physically :n ht ICvel of in ;cJri;,y cornirivns•urate with itt• "'Uit,rre ire the vworl,d go4ing community and a place C'on'4iS ;Ghl nlith the of the City of Edina. The design and consieucJo'n tear: assembled here for this protect by ininrlachen County Club has produced similar projects to this one most,reecritly at the Hazeltine National Golf Course in Chanhassen, '�'t'rrirlesota. Visitation to that site i5 ai:ti'ays '::elcomed. Barr Engin er-'rng. a nationally recognizf'd erfq oeerincj company based in Edina, MIN is preparing the coc�;men:s for the czrCh'; ;orks, larnd_capin_7, and environmental censidevations. Truman Ho'w'ell Architects 6 Associates, inc is providing tine design and ';:arking dr ;rs:ings for the nevv and r_omodelr3d buiidinrys on the site. They are zin < :rchAcctural firm located in this area for over 30 years and prepared the design and documentation for the Hazeltine project. 3H &H Conszructiori Services, a sister company to TH•A is providing the construction for this pro ;ecl as ir,ey did in Hazeltine. AB cf thre firms have extensive experience in their respeciv'v.2 fields and are providing apurol)r:;-tc coorti6alion ;Ath intc.rlach.n CoLCn ;rY C €Lib On this p:CjCCt. Tr un n IC.vdel! f, t Truman Howcsll Arct,iteels & Associates, Inc, - o MND YIETUND ELAR R EDGE OF \1(`/ SEE SHEET C-] TOR NFSTORATON, \ �9N005 NTCEWE PER CI�OYO �� CONCRETE RUNE RRESENVADON C(IY OE EDPU OAS ME 1 a CANNEL CONNSTRucnoN AS -SUE.T ONAwwc iE o . EDGE OF ,YETANO \ �i FENCE OF flfTY�ME POW ® \ S 5 EYISNNO ERISIRHO TENGE REfAINWG CI¢SIwO R1� YMLL g BIIRDYHD FENCE L. 20' fi m IMR.26fi• S�4 SOUTHEAST OF {"RRV PROPDTY CORNER euunwc Ecr.SD.z• R � LYf srAnox i .� -• -';C � FD+CE uES ,.o' a 11 f N /SNP E E 12 UrrESE INFEE" r a m+oRmTr a j C GET BUEMNC 6 Sfi• ^I �g EAST of PROPERTY 1 ` 4s - E/S°TENf co '_! \ � O ® 4• CW1w LRO,'iEI1CF EA6TIND iENCE =.,a. TORCENNN RER EpH� ST { NGT.IB.T �� OTAIANG 0.2' FAST G HM-1 OF LIES Q1• FAST OF PROPEAIY COTdEA e Ya,DOWN LOCAMN \ I PER THE CM OF ED- ! a MNNfMN ACCESS TO DOSTUG EDGE OF a UFT STATION PER CTY OF EDINA wr MIN0U5 e sARtuT JOINT NGTE& 1: RDd OF CAS. DECTRIC. TEIEFNKHV. CARE iE AND ALL OVER MMES COO AUTE YOM p5 y A t. F)OSTMD SNITIAY/WER STMCES- ANNIOON PER COY OF EDINA REQUIRENENTS FOR 4 elmnwc ,. 1 P DEMOLMON O I!!eEE - u w tw EXISTING UTILRI6 DEMOLITION .uu[ w FEET QI F]OSTD10 ,fi' STORM SEWER REUOYE E:TISIINO BUTGNC PER BRAUN wTERiFl STAP CLE TNG L ME TO ® ff I TO BE SAVED I I ©FLFCIWT!L IRHE 10 UF'f STATION (UNKNOWN) ®pEMOVFffi11VAGE EIT6'IING IETNNPM• NALL Q4 EIOSiYHG YTAIFAMMI O DasTNG SATERAU SEWEA IWN a WNHg1E O REMO/E EKWING CONCRETE DRNERAY Q E]asmc NYOMM ®SA OYE FT LS wG N IWINOUS p NETYAY QT MUTECf DWSRND POYRR POLE ® REMCYE EYETTHO { CHAw IINN FENCE TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHTrMCrs k AS30C.,OVC. a VWW SCAUT }�QO� C4 SEE SHEET 2 I I I I gyp• I f�, , ,,, =___- _ =ter -_ - -- _ '/ �:; � LEGEND I I r I o — -s s C I , 1 I I {� V I I �o� r- 11'1 I S1f� r MP0.F — r —IWIER YM° 1f nE�J I I I O .. 1 \ ■ EILL .D. �.— OM1EMI4D ..ES my Uc, _c^ .D.aslc Ixalr :L:trl.■I.w.ID ua =77-4111,R11,91 I tl ,aln ^0.E -- --- BYEDMD arid'. _A1pNEY AV�UE — -- •o so r laa ■w — . —wrra +cuss "— �— ; � _c WAU 11 FEET : wozwlxun » rosr rulcer�n\E I—T aYx c «IY, �i rrp 1 ■ EOrwxM M, ■DY I / 1 ­10 Bo. ■nwxas sw■aa ,n+ h 1N6 Lu­ 5. Y 7E ME.Q CEM L. t E.xoSWE SAIA'AQ AIJ' \l nil C�:�'`: ``�. � � •;,, � � 1 ;�; � ; /CA.± �� M� b � " MM I IYi 4 ^� ✓`l. � %:��-� \`�r•_ � -� / I;I III I '�I I GoMw srewlae C+o (D51- °Sti000x1 +wb r° r __ - ,� -_'II __; � % "��� -- _- 1 ¢ "' IIiIi1 ` � � \ ♦ I ill ,Il rn,l an sm��vu .mrab Inl, °.Yw>n..bn ul.IZl. \ . r�,7,Irp Io -_ — _- `i.� __ _ a)rMre wakmurrW°Iw rr /al /06. `\' err /\ `3 � ,1 i L'L 1 `011A - - - =`r� -14 -• , /; ., =4.'; SWIKYDR'5 faaD CE I .wll —K, u°t nW w..+Y. qm a rwl w+ prwr °y lme Su-1 u. a°I. I. ar YMn°lu � 5 • °• x \ •1 .u, - ¢j) - C 4j -- -_._�- rte— /.+�/6ys`� , ,,♦ II / \\�`� �`� '1 .. ^ate__ �• a\ r' } 1, viihr`\J —r r f xl 111 x I I l ____"_'- ____ \i��` \\' f Ci. v:: is 25 oU�� ' \. ; �. ' REM fngineeving Plwninq Surveying MFRA 11eUMI frA RM u:owU Inc. Interlachen Country Club EElna. Minnesota Pmlut Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue E01na, Minnesota Sheet TOe TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY Y M m vat N. dwr m+ 54MV° al. IIM/iom Ilmw E nxss oe.I.l.e a.Yns wx Dr..n ■Illr h■wwa IYI a1, 11/IOAWE PA"on vc al+ By Dwrrwru 31" Revision '/2jU MFRA FILE NO, 1lSi1 r— —i — — — — — — I I � -- I I I I I I rhJr - I 1r�13 I rJ I --T-1------------ I \ / I \ / IF 1 - I I � I I I rJG• I I I I I I SEE SHEET 1 a FOND uDNIruENi uENi LEGEND — SANITARY SEwCP — —STdiu SEV.LP r MW a EIEC. BDx ti WV ANWDR it ucxr • Wr n Pq£ —wATUR uAlx - -aVF .— w.RCS — •— UNDEPWWNO 6ECINH: UNDFPGRWND GAS - / "ZBUILDIND UNE ----- BUM1dHG CANaPr U_ SIW o uAxxac o — evvN • Aura SPRwxLCA — • —RIWr OF ACCESS — WxCPl7E CMB KMCAloP VALVE IDPAIN GALE VALVE d xrDRANr RDDF (.11,k) B CWWNICATDN BO. DI SPWNMEP BDM w BIrUNMDUS SURF — WARD POST = Ca .— SURFACE SCHEDULE B nEN f9M LANDSCAPE SURFACE D SO IW SCALE W FEET R,)J�o IP � REMOOCb Engfnefffn g • Planning ' S^<Nng V N A&s F M,1n . Assosieles, Inc. I.aA IafA Aw,n,F Ib1A : SM. 1.B r+ m a+., • esus rwx mV.m -amD -I/ . Eo, ro/ m-ssv cliem Interlachen Country Club Edina, Minnesota Project Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Mlnassula Mind rdle TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY wxBr —11 uNl ua. P. r ar•PI .r.ae.^ smPOA. .In D. xNNn Del• LI/IA /ap5 Upn.. f 17= Dulvxa a.e.a xon 0— FFa A,— MN DM. 101/— Revwm Sheet Revision 2� E MFM FILE NO.: 16169 I� l I � _ ..��\ \\ .\, ",. i -':�. � \ea• -.. is /:..I J POND,: I I I I 1 I 1 . I I I I 1 I I I I � 1J-II I II_I ►►�►�►� -,• ,- I SITE PLAN N r. evo S ITC Pc.AIJ Z ft a �ppp m� �m M?A/w 7-0Q-0' PLAN AS1 ft �I�WINTENANCE�` � 1{ \•� - i - �� � �/ -I/ W -BUILDMG / W I \ _ L I – — CAS 1J-II I II_I ►►�►�►� -,• ,- I SITE PLAN N r. evo S ITC Pc.AIJ Z ft a �ppp m� �m M?A/w 7-0Q-0' PLAN AS1 ft V � 8 0 O: 00 0 0 Q O .O _ f�/, O O 0 O 0 r, 1 PLAN: MAINTENANCE FACILITY LANDSCAPEN o o so O I I l� 0 9D Q I I--, • TREE LEGEND: �' - Q 00 .0 Swamp White Oak 0) 0 0 q - C) 1{� Ouercus bicolor Triumph Elm Ulmus'Morton Glossy' GROUNDCOVERLEGEND: Q .- . 0000 American Larch O Lerix lericlne O l� 0 9D Q Norway Spruce Picea abies 0 - Q 00 .0 O Existing tree to be saved. See Sheet C5, Tree Preservellon Plan O Cox (30 `' O Q 0 (:;0 GROUNDCOVERLEGEND: Q .- . 0000 Fine Fesuce Grass Mix r•� I Wet Meadow Mix Q 0 0 00 0 0 O. 0 O '1. 5' Gravel Maintenance Strip - - - Heavy Metal Switch Gress Panicum virgalum 'Heavy Metal' -• - - - O Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle Diervilla lonicere 0 r Q� Ivory Halo Dogwood Comus alba 'Badhalo' O O 0� 0 LAAsckP�' KA-AJ B- r� "4 e HF i @sE; € -s n4 f0 0 if-is 9 YES 30 EAU TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS R ASSOC.,INC. 5/N2oos TKlO' -0' L1 s rn c !1C 01TI r" M .� � y � \�;.:. ,`4 <\ \ � �vl: - (' � • .tea _ `s+ � r 1 iW - LR7 v - PRESERVAMON LEGEND: E 5 e �s n TRUMAN HOWELL ARCEMCTS a FLM ra vmvm a -o� �e C5 N w :. g. G - J1 I I I 9 9 _ �gF s rn c !1C 01TI r" M .� � y � \�;.:. ,`4 <\ \ � �vl: - (' � • .tea _ `s+ � r 1 iW - LR7 v - PRESERVAMON LEGEND: E 5 e �s n TRUMAN HOWELL ARCEMCTS a FLM ra vmvm a -o� �e C5 � 11 -11 I %j'�I /- r� � r/ �T 7 / ►/ � I - r /-rl� ��i� 11. =11. I�'� © y� •�. � �.. �.• . 0 _n- 11- 11:= 11 "II -11- �i.J�h.,,1-- 11- R•`II -h -u Ila Mt mom ma � II II 11 II II 11 =11 i' 11 ;IInIL;�I��II�.IL�.II:��IC�II: n� 7' 3 L,.'�.�,�...... ZN •iii Wn:.. • S[�1� � } ��;, l���� \���`� ^ \V'�N• \ \ \ \`� \ \ \L`a \ \\ \mac ��� \ \��'.'� \` \ \�� \ \ \���� v RUN= r ' � r / LR �C C PLAN HARR z� ■ C� #i J f�EV -V C2 S 5 S 5 S- L---------------- z moLmoN NOTE: 1. SEE SNEET Cl NR OVETB01 L TBN !. T01-- REOUME.D OVEN DISTURBED AREA 3. SEED d MULCH IMMEOIAMY AT COMPLETION OF OEMOUOON a, LEAVE IN PIACE E1I—G CONCRETE F ME 9. BRECT EXISTING DRAINAGE M EXBTRIG CONCRETE FLUME. W SWALE OR L MNG r- v � .Imo >LEGEND ELAM ® ar rou ® Imin Dnwla ® ww- aAawrff® ® ET®x mxTTm BuMTET - ur. o STRMT . ® etRNresE ar ro c ® SR16.T S�E.o AS M¢ErsAAlw �. EON11MCfOR SWLLL wASN OIR CONCRETE 10.1118 0RSITE a CONCRETE 0`T PLANT. E. TMM➢wA1 BwFFP AID OUST CONTROL BtlOF11TAL TO SMPPP IMFLIMEIBATPON J. 4. OF TOPS9 L RS)UI EO NR ALL OBIUIBED AREAS. i �d Q� Reae� 5 E Tai Miner m !d Im Nw Cd Miner men P.v !d ®,eo. wl� �ieES 0 a.� rM.w wlmo .MOe TmmeF 6Sfi�9 .me e.,.�M oe�•w :fir g f �i g WE ;- . ARCHITECTS a.� vWO T� .! TMaco OHt Y 0&jq%J 1 SBA. FM NAHW 33 eN; B=N0 INCWWAL M RPE WORK 2 MINIWW OEPM Of WAR]OW! 6 T3' M THE W Df RPE 1 COROiK1DR SN APPLY MA COY K EDMA SEWER AND WATER PER - N1101 WRE - 10 uu¢ sam REIMED MR SWDEARY SERME - D= MA m PIPE WORK Z YERVY WCrt1 ARCIEf6E/eDODFA C., LmAmN w MIRES = muDPRs uA�u� WW e• swrtARr eEWn+ uAw - >D>R ae e• —AR, SERME - SCN b e• WAMCR —R - mm C —ER sERME - DUCLLE MH RPE u m E' SERVICE - 119E N COPPER 0 AO e0 ..yµE W fECf UTILrr� PbW wWa%i Y E�t <� 0 ee F F �a9 �e TRUMAN HoWEl f ARCEMCTS &,SSOC.,KC Y4 d�� I TVO'-0' flr i W� b C6 \ \\� \'�\\ •� v \\ eN; B=N0 INCWWAL M RPE WORK 2 MINIWW OEPM Of WAR]OW! 6 T3' M THE W Df RPE 1 COROiK1DR SN APPLY MA COY K EDMA SEWER AND WATER PER - N1101 WRE - 10 uu¢ sam REIMED MR SWDEARY SERME - D= MA m PIPE WORK Z YERVY WCrt1 ARCIEf6E/eDODFA C., LmAmN w MIRES = muDPRs uA�u� WW e• swrtARr eEWn+ uAw - >D>R ae e• —AR, SERME - SCN b e• WAMCR —R - mm C —ER sERME - DUCLLE MH RPE u m E' SERVICE - 119E N COPPER 0 AO e0 ..yµE W fECf UTILrr� PbW wWa%i Y E�t <� 0 ee F F �a9 �e TRUMAN HoWEl f ARCEMCTS &,SSOC.,KC Y4 d�� I TVO'-0' flr i W� b C6 i WUTN ELEVATION a MAINTENANCE BUILDING i ss. na DOLOR ��� c OLom ® YMD T111 s1L MlTO M�QI DOOIIIM SNN W COC10 114 11Kg1 YO Ctl19R rRMO 1418 EAST ELEVATION a MAINTENANCE BUILDING AI rm.w 3 VEST ELEVATION a MAINTENANCE BUILDING - ys. ro q NO;M ELEVATION a MAINTENANCE BUILDING - AI ys. ro gJILD IAJ6 ELE \JPrT l Z i° Fn 4/24/09 ;3T4-O' MA9iT BULDNO BEVATglE om xn Al r°j M. PLAN ® CADDIE SWAAV CART STORAGE atoiii ■ICI ■I ■BI■IUNEmmi. ' illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll��lllll II II e NORTH ELEVATION ys - ry COLOR SCHEDULE MAT A A 4 g OMST ELEVATION A7 7 =.. W IPIIII:ay� II�II IIIIIIIIIIII ;: � ° g EAST ELEVATION em'•w IL61MG ELtOA'F(O-a zd' z 7 a$ TRUMAN HOWELL ARCEMCTS a MOC.JNC. ema� % aiaua® A2 1UV 'd JA ow 6,a A" a Interlachen Comm, ub -Maintenance, acm TRUMAN HOWELL- tm. s. c qt@opopg__C.omjntry Club -_.Maintogimoce FACAlY rRIINfAkN HOWELL %RCUIrxLr-', I ASSOC HIC ti _ s � 5 ' � J■ M Ne tti lit I��lr�� 11 fii A� P� a �. , .fir' '� ; .:� ,��„ ,,,T+.•g .w `r • ^ 4 � ti \ � i� *� __ it "'1 ..�yry.�`:�'r - _.. ..� ..r t'., - . -o � j. C' _z � x,71 � .�}•. ��� � -�...' �_. i�hl r¢ , �. '� i i.� ya i �T (� ��. i f:• • - ,� MMM �� _ '4- W MEW 5 MAINTENANCE BUILDING FLOOR PLAN � FLOOR n 20 PL ho } e� u0. � � gy@ FA 8 drz 4/24/08 8/8Z -r-7 MA BULL BUL08i0 BOOR aar xn A3 N T C G G G f C C C G 6 G f C C I f L L f C C C f L L L C C C C L L L L C L C L e C L L L L C C [ C C C C L C C C G[ L L C L C C[ C C C L C L L L C L C C C C e[ C C C C C C G C C f L L e C C C C C f f G G C C L C L C c L e e e c e e e c e e e e e e e e c L e e c G c e e c e e L L e f c e e e e e c c e e c e e L a L e e e e L e e c c e e e c c c e e c e L e L e G G L e c e f PHOTM MIOS LIGHTING PLAN N F'NI r. Lp4 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE El en.s+ x) r.s.•.s�r vsMw Oa o .x im.•wrm �e _�� .� � oo . .•.a,m �amoxK.osnm. or- xm n xawn oenlxnun n STATISTICS ueVa er.m ..x *vw NOTES awm.....w.d �..Lmcer..�xmc HA�[Ix MORa�x ONMEW yAqA ZZ VIM �. NCOm�I�II /OLD aa�s L oLmwm KAD _- Er ^Lr - -e f...�.+aesw L.n fw�. xio uy.a .... - ... Willmom — 2'.... .....■ ■..... ■..tt. t..... ■...t. MEMNON lummum fAAnFOUwd �a. ui MO M..t.. ..... =__•n. _ \1111 \�tt ■� �'. \ ■ ■■ 7.. ....n ■\ 1... iiiU..n ii■■■ - It ■■ ` 1111 ■i.... tt..0 .i..t. cZ G 4%24/09 f-0P-9 Orri 0 RAN PH1 \ M� .7 T C G G G f C C C G 6 G f C C I f L L f C C C f L L L C C C C L L L L C L C L e C L L L L C C [ C C C C L C C C G[ L L C L C C[ C C C L C L L L C L C C C C e[ C C C C C C G C C f L L e C C C C C f f G G C C L C L C c L e e e c e e e c e e e e e e e e c L e e c G c e e c e e L L e f c e e e e e c c e e c e e L a L e e e e L e e c c e e e c c c e e c e L e L e G G L e c e f PHOTM MIOS LIGHTING PLAN N F'NI r. Lp4 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE El en.s+ x) r.s.•.s�r vsMw Oa o .x im.•wrm �e _�� .� � oo . .•.a,m �amoxK.osnm. or- xm n xawn oenlxnun n STATISTICS ueVa er.m ..x *vw NOTES awm.....w.d �..Lmcer..�xmc HA�[Ix MORa�x ONMEW yAqA ZZ VIM �. NCOm�I�II /OLD aa�s L oLmwm KAD _- Er ^Lr - -e f...�.+aesw L.n fw�. xio uy.a .... - ... Willmom — 2'.... .....■ ■..... ■..tt. t..... ■...t. MEMNON lummum fAAnFOUwd �a. ui MO M..t.. ..... =__•n. _ \1111 \�tt ■� �'. \ ■ ■■ 7.. ....n ■\ 1... iiiU..n ii■■■ - It ■■ ` 1111 ■i.... tt..0 .i..t. cZ G 4%24/09 f-0P-9 Orri 0 RAN PH1 41, wr WAWA, 1tg a NIP j "INC war 44 i 'V wr �+ r sole .4• 4N Yft- 0 k ji, IF 'mat �� 9rslti � 5'ji��i�t Lm - NP i, 14� rl OF IV Nit BF. .,7 4 4'. lo -�x 11 kfto At at vo Z'A . tz OW I —I j r ! .% ' ` _ V 'L �:J -. :•sue , - -� � �' 1 �. `� 5'-. r5" `' _ , . •� .S,f _ ._ �> •yam _. —�. � � ��rtr '.� ' � �� r v [ i _ t � r� des ��l f•w-�' "`�1. y • � � � .4 / =h11(.�'. J Am VA- • \ /. - • �° r � �,.�' ��; �•� � ��, 167-• "" '� • Z� I is {� jj ayc �: Yfvv P Poi f �� •G 41 A .Y a' i �� "A �lv ^ !rp �1 �� _' .'�'- ���..ai l '•i h ..` , M r vi L �•. �� I IPA q r � puf . L - --k Z. ` k,• .ACV... wm 1 F21ok • j sC ;� <: 1 � ,y / t j, iJ � I• /., Ak ( �;1•. ,��' to �TR S fk 1p •�.rbj1��r�'!�ay1 i � (�.� y-�a ` . i fir- Z�� 1 ��� 6 T p r lili•" -� �� �. '•,�(kp�, iA� ���:�1 -� �'�- !'�}�f+.Ri% bP�li rw y! .•r ��+ •1• ,'.i.kp''''?�. r`��clf�� ?- r �4� . #Et* t �/ < y' '�J 7f n ,, �- ..;3 f"- •w i��ry�i``�: fir W[._s �11iR• l �, `_ `14t - ..�.�, 'Ej+l!` . ' b, I i *t. e1 ,}�` �� + r , t�Y "ti + <��{ ,1 tea\ t�'� { 1i. �i - 1 i T ��}}` Zy !•r '.j,�F -a; .�. 1 ��i(' .�1� ♦ !�*(f�J �✓y}y('�+gj. jjTj � 1y 1 r ��G T w� 'M; 1 i Ci"i� 1� i ;yam iw I.1 - • :-* y i,�l,,ki r*'! "' *1 `fk••T� ! 4" -'.'7 j� ' `V; 'Ilk;. _ �� cr /� P I � �r ^: t G���I'�*��'�•.n• ` iE� Q +� i i { ' l �n, ,'//f{41�11�`j�'�`i4��1+�'y+�' rTi�.'.: :�G'•` 4�i�`�} >(�s¢'!�� ';. •i, f- +fl'1 \rt'•lww..••ii y� +�CC ,.L1 'd ` f•, e n 4. Vi'i'i. ,dtA6; �� ,y,G�Si,L� .�' ,,�, ham' �'- .; -� • � : r�i�r ~ '�-.. -`�fc, 17• r�'1,+�« = i '1"-� '�. a1 11r'�• tf',1r•,' _ ►� _ Sid - .,. 4t��� i1✓� l '4r .y. OP Ar'• _ ~ .. e1i! _ ?, T !Tf L?6'i a '.� 4�v Cti' .. � :s?e �.r3 w? _'"'At*V ' - J - - � •t STI &XI_ r "r. CTS. � 5� Y., 4-41-1 �1 '� � Afo 6v fig - - _ pop ------ SOUTIMAM 4. .[- Y'•,,.. ..' -s �+i •- �,,�l li'r'�i��:.•1L21S _��_- _'K•.n'•'._- - ,.F 4 ow Ito s +:�� ? �~ t ..7 !' �'`rr'i'�,C y - ,' .� '�! �,. M- ,�5,,�..x�. -.. „`�, :iC�'.. •�c °''.r� ` •'�s,9�' n]IYA++�K"`y +�•.��' �.� . -, � t ...,_ �.�il �' �'a"� � �► �. .: .err _ - •" ��; « ��� � r• ,; •j s '. a' �r � a •, r u•r•�: 4 . t 1 �' �• t }�"- it � `� ' 'tY�L _��, * TtCj �.- l4:�,` ,' ?rw � j:Y ' %�. � �. r:•> }+� :a. � rj'R '�:: fir 1 •,. � t.,�.'�a� R = rt`.,v'� i`� � �l„ ~ ara -. *_ ' C >s r ~ '�r•V � A V I' r ;I�: �N h �I +, S, ' ii �#„ . �w ,ly. Cr• S 71� ¢ ° ��'►r,�a1n'1: � r . iIS '.. ' � -� ' '! a -',t • ,i �.��y%'Jf�' � .` ,� ,� *'y+�'� � � 1 Q''r iJr.. � S�� �' � •I d C�, it . `L� ',,y; -+,"'� y'� - - �.-i Tom'•) i ;� �' , rw '� .. '•� � . � � `' ter'" ,,,,� . ' .fir►- °�+.s_ - t CAI W. X. IP ALL- � i •91 .j�!lii� _ fa -vow is AM. Ir ry f 4p%,- loy �•�, iF'' tr �f' f x r,. t c R i f A� +, i' -e'er` — t ir o' � �pia`l �: • qQ�t ..1 � �.I��:t���, � �� IrAf{ X1 7 �III � "�•�'Fi '•�, `''C� 1 „ � � .A � �"tl � 1; � �,� �� ►,1 , 4.y, !/ -4.14 Ice.. Lvt t� `1is . y, •rs . 4 `,. , rs j` r .',4, r�r^ .c Y.1: 4{ S �'Z 4:i ',� +. ,'�` T•, i . .�a7�� �•'(� ,•r rt %fit �, `�� .I � i •r N�'�;�: 1•�J.: t �� . ,`i't. .� � •4 y�y.lf7l"��• ,d �v�/ '�1��� �r :dpi! /.'�y �i t � j� * �.� n+ + �`� . � , /�r _ ♦ ,,' Yt74c\ N.r o��,.�i; '�. ,. y�•.1•. iy +i' � ,� . rw ���-. � - / f �. �d 4l fit .••�A � ♦� r: Nr- _w DATE: May 22, 2009 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Update Memo for Interlachen Country Club — Maintenance and Storage Facility Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has reviewed the traffic for this facility, see attached draft minutes from the September 18, 2008 ETC meeting. • A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as the MPCA, MNDH, and MCES. • All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet AS1 - Site Plan: 1. Truck turning movements within the building courtyard are adequate; fire pumper truck and typical delivery truck - WB50 Truck were analyzed, see attached. Sheet C4 — Demolition Plan: 1. All utility services need to be disconnected at the main line; water services turned off at the corporation and sanitary services disconnected at the mainline by replacing the wye. Sheet C6 — Utility Plan: The water and sanitary sewer connections to the City's utility system will not adversely affect the existing system. 1. Remove the proposed utility easement on the westerly side, not sure why this is needed through middle of pond. 2. Eliminate utility easement within project; all utility lines to be private lines. 3. Label all sanitary and water lines within project as "private" (this must be shown on each pipe segment). 4. Show on water main the proposed location of new gate - valve. 5. Line existing force main from lift station to first bend with a CIPP liner. 6. Do not reuse existing sanitary sewer manhole with drop. Remove and replace existing sanitary sewer manhole with new manhole where flow line runs through invert. Sheet C7 — Restroom #1 Plan: 1. Install new wye on existing sanitary sewer service located in Bywood West. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks G: \Engineering \General \I Streets \6200 Interlachen Maintenance Facility\2009 Submittals\20090522 review of 6200 Interlachen Boulevard GC Maint Facil.doc _. 436 V, FFE i 923 924 .7 is i ST-9 ST-! 20.2 TURNING RWIUS D RAFT a 20 lo uua . WT BARR II ;Lx, R = ,* MU Fig 1 KM: WB50 TRUCK TURNING RADIUS 0 2D S- I MET �0 DRAFT ST-1 BARR PON I Fig 1 Cary Teague From: Tom Jenson Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:42 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Interlachen Country Club fire department access Cary, The fire apparatus access road to the proposed new maintenance building at Interlachen Country Club does meet the requirements of the 2007 Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) section 503. There is plenty of room to turn vehicles around by backing them up. As part of my plan review notes when the review process starts will be to designate turn around areas inside the site. This will be accomplished with striping and /or signs, but probably not finalized until the site is nearing completion. Let me know if you have any questions on this. Thanks, Thomas Jenson Fire Marshal Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina Mn 55436 952.826.0337 Fax 952.826.0393 Cell 952.210.6511 A3"l C. Missing the exception for sprinklered buildings allowing code official to ^rease this lance. Proposed facility is accessible from Interlachen Blvd and Waterman Ave At the time of plan review with the architect the fire lanes will be addressed. Hazardous materials will be addressed at plan review with the architect per Chapter 27. 2 CoM)AtPTS FK60- Y R t C I46F ffi) 0 Fib(- An ,4QSH*L (RE-StOO(C TO R� S 108 Therefore, the Commission is compelled to deny or table the application until the code iC tj (14FRA) S can be updated to address the impacts of each use. T-©vmo AT Application Does Not Meet the Conditions as Required in the CUP: T 4) S RC P WT 1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. No Public Benefit: The proposed facility does not provide a public benefit. To the contrary, it has a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhoods and only benefits the applicant. ' Safety: The proposed facility cannot be adequately served by police and fire protection. State Fire Code requires that all buildings be'accessible by suitable fire access lane (regardless of whether or not the building is sprinkled). MSFC (07) Section 503.1.1 requires the installation of fire apparatus access roads for all new buildings and new additions to existing buildings when any portion of the exterior wall is more than 150 feet from the furthest point of fire apparatus access. The This will be requirement for fire department access road applies to all buildings and additions addressed with the constructed on or afterJuiv 10.2007. architect at the time of plan review a. The proposed facility cannot be accessed by any public road in the per Section 503.2. I of.an emergency. b. The plan does not indicate a location of an official fire lane. c. The existing_parking lot and private drive may not be built to city standards capable of handing the weight and turning radiuses of fireO trucks as required by state code. d. The facility is located on a dead end path and lacks a fire truck Study not turnaround. needed ... will meet e. A study should be done t ' �ani her or not the . ' y can code. adequately served by poliice. This will be The above reasons constitute a threat to the public welfar=residents here ore addressed at the is compelled to deny the application. time of plan review per Section Chemical and Fertilizer Storage: The health and wellness 503.2.5. At this Circles neighborhood is at risk due to the increase storage of chemicals and fertiliz time on the close proximity to a residential neighborhood. A list of all proposed chemical and proposed plan I do fertilizers that may be stored at the facility should be made public, including all the not see this as that may be flammable or toxic. If any of the proposed are found to be flammable toxic, the proposed facility should have an emergency action plan in place to adeq problem. allow for emergency vehicle access to this remote area of the site during all times of day and during events. Storm Water Runoff. The existing clubhouse parking lot storm water runoff is not treated before it enters the wetland /pond. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing maintenance shed and expand the parking lot. The applicant should be A37c� J From 2007 Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503, Fire Apparatus Access Roads 503.1 Where required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Sections 503.1.1 through 503.1.3. 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. Exception: The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet where: 1. The building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3. 2. Fire apparatus access roads cannot be installed because of location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades or other similar conditions, and an approved alternative means of fire protection is provided. 3. There are not more than two Group R -3 or Group U occupancies. 503.1.2 Additional access. The fire code official is authorized to require more than one fire apparatus access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. 503.1.3 High -piled storage. Fire department vehicle access to buildings used for high - piled combustible storage shall comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 23. 503.2 Specifications. Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and arranged in accordance with Sections 503.2.1 through 503.2.7. 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. 503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall have the authority to require an increase in the minimum access widths where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations. 503.2.3 Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. 503.2.4 'Turning radius. The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be determined by the fire code official. 503.2.5 Dead ends. Dead -end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. 503.2.6 Bridges and elevated surfaces. Where a bridge or an elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB -17. Bridges and elevated surfaces shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when required by the fire code official. Where elevated 437� surfaces designed for emergency vehicle use are adjacent to surfaces which are not designed for such use, approved barriers, approved signs or both shall be installed and maintained when required by the fire code official. 503.2.7 Grade. The grade of the fire apparatus access road shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire department's apparatus. 503.3 Marking. Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. Signs or notices shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. The minimum widths and clearances established in Section 503.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. 503.5 Required gates or barricades. The fire code official is authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across fire apparatus access roads, trails or other accessways, not including public streets, alleys or highways. 503.5.1 Secured gates and barricades. When required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. Roads, trails and other accessways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by Section 503.5 shall not be trespassed on or used unless authorized by the owner and the fire code official. Exception: The restriction on use shall not apply to public officers. acting within the scope of duty. 503.6 Security gates. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the fire chief. Where security gates are installed, they shall have an approved means of emergency operation. The security gates and the emergency operation shall be maintained operational at all times. 437c y .0 /. MEMO DATE: May 22, 2009 TO: Cary Teague, Planning Director -zl� FROM: Bob Wilsdn, City Assessor SUBJECT: Proposed Maintenance Building Based on the information that you have provided to me regarding the proposed maintenance facility at Interlachen Country Club, it is my opinion that the proposed facility would not have a negative impact on surrounding property values. A37� Page 1 of 1 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. b. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETIN' REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: IV. b. From: Jack Sullivan, P ,-7, ACTION: Assistant City E sneer ❑ Recommendation /Motion Date: September 18, 2008 ® Discussion Subject: Traffic study - ® Information 6200 Interlachen — Interlachen CC Maintenance Bldg Recommendation: Review the attached draft traffic impact study submitted by Spack Consultants dated July 18, 2008 and a follow up memo dated September 11, 2008. The memo dated September 11, 2008 outlines the changes in the site configuration that 1._ longer require a traffic study. This information is provided to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) for information only and no recommendation by the ETC is necessary. Info /Background: Staff received a draft traffic impact study on August 28, 2008 for the construction of a new 24,000 sq ft maintenance and storage facility on Belmore Lane east of John Street. This facility was to combine their two existing smaller facilities in to one building. The number of employees and trips generated from the site was to remain the same. However, Interlachen Country Club wanted to move the access from Waterman Avenue to Belmore Lane. This was the trigger for the traffic impact study: Since the draft traffic study was completed the development team decided to gate the proposed access to Belmore Lane and use it for only emergency access. Therefore all trips generated from the new maintenance facility would continue to use Watermain Avenue. Since the use of the property, number of employees, number of deliveries and access location are to remain the same no traffic study is required by the Engineering Department or Edina Transportation Commission. A;� G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas \2008 R& R \200809118_6200_Interlachen.doc i e z 0 F -C3 Q r _ - -P ORTION OF BELMORE LANE TO BE VACATED - -' t BELMORE LANE (F.K A SETH AVE.} LO - SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF;THE WEST -� LIME OF LOT 1, WILMOIr-S . ADDITION t EAST LINE OF MENDEL.SSOHN- i I Scale:1 in. = 30 fL MOM Designed: Exhibit Number _f >,"' Intertachen Country Club Dravm �,� r WpMAgmerrYri Ap roved: HON Belmore Avenue Initial Issue: oena2ooa Edina, Mfnnesnta Rev.: Iaecom6s FranliROOe � Vacation EXI1I Date: Project N0. INT77705 Assoeiete=;lne.K+wirr�aarn Sack s THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY September 11, 2008 Mr. Jack Sullivan, PE City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility — Response to Traffic Study Comments Dear Jack, A draft Traffic Impact Study was completed in- July 2008 for Interlachen Country Club's proposed maintenance facility. The draft study contains useful data, but is no longer valid because Interlachen is reverting back to the existing access configuration for the maintenance facility (via Waterman Avenue). The proposed access onto Belmore Lane, the impetus for the traffic study, will now be gated and serve as an access only for emergency vehicles. Interlachen needs the larger maintenance building to store more supplies and equipment which will allow them to operate more efficiently. They do not intend to add more staff. The parking provided for staff is being shifted so the 33 grounds crew members will now be able to park next to the maintenance facility. The grounds crew typically arrives to Interlachen early in the morning and leaves early in the afternoon. Their traffic does not impact the traditional rush hour periods and has little impact on the area roadway network. Because Interlachen is not proposing to add more staff or change its access locations, they are not altering the existing traffic patterns. Since the proposed maintenance facility will not alter the existing traffic patterns, no Traffic Impact Study is needed. Please contact me if you need further information. Sincerely, SPACK CONSULTING Michael P. Spack, P.E. President IM �.�•���i '*.ti, * +:•r "?.: 9' f�'�;z'; k, !. J ai. r +1�`` 1►` —�� `^"?�r ST. -J- 4eA4 Draft a. c k- THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Traffic l M' - L- C l -- 7 -- Interlachen Country Club Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: Michael P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: 7 -18 -08 A. +t. I V, Vj4 a -Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Summary .......................... ..............................1 2. Proposed Development and Study Area ... ............................... 2 3. Existing Traffic Conditions ......................... ............................... 3 4. Projected Traffic ...:.......:.............................. ............................... 5 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis ............. ............................... 6 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ........ ............................... 7 7. Appendix ...................................................... ............................... 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure2.1 — Location Map .................................................... ..............................2 LIST OF TABLES Table 4.1 — Existing Weekday Traffic .................................. ..............................4 Table 4.2 — Existing Saturday Traffic .................................. ..............................4 Table 4.3 — Existing Sunday Traffic ..................................... ..............................4 Table4.4 —Trip Generation ................................................... ..............................5 Table 4.5 — Existing Weekday Traffic .................................. ..............................6 Table 4.6 — Weekday Traffic with Development .................. ..............................6 Table 4.7 — Saturday Traffic with Development .................. ..............................6 Table 4.8 — Sunday Traffic with Development .................... ..............................6 V-J- Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility i Edina, AN Traffic Impact Study July, 2008 D, "Draft" 1. Introduction and Summary a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives Interlachen Country Club is proposing to build a maintenance and storage facility on Belmore Lane east of John Street in Edina, MN. The two buildings will have approximately 24,000 square feet of combined space. A parking lot with 33 stalls will be provided for Interlachen employees. One single family home (6200 Belmore Lane) will be demolished as part of this development. The purpose of this report is to determine if completion of the maintenance and storage facility will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system. The study objectives are: i. Determine the existing traffic patterns on Belmore Lane. ii. Determine if Belmore Lane and Blake Road will operate acceptably with the new development. iii. Recommend improvements or development modifications if needed. b. Executive Summary Interlachen Country Club is proposing to add a maintenance and storage facility in Edina, MN. The existing single family home on the site will be removed and approximately 24,000 square feet of maintenance /storage facilities will be built. The parking lot will be accessed on the west via Belmore Lane. A twelve foot wide road on the south side of the site will provide the connection between the new facility and the Country Club. City staff has requested a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic impacts of the redevelopment on Belmore Lane and Blake Road. A full Transportation Impact Analysis is not required for this development per the City of Edina's Transportation Impact Analysis Initiation and Review Policy — April 2007. The principal findings of this study are: i. There are approximately 8,500 vehicles per day currently using Blake Road near Belmore Lane and there will be 8,600 vehicles per day if the proposed development is built. Both daily volumes are below Blake Road's capacity of 10,000 vehicles per day. ii. There are approximately 310 vehicles per day currently using Belmore Lane east of Blake Road and there will be 430 vehicles per day if the proposed development is built. Both Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility Trafftc Impact Study Edina, MN July, 2008 Draft - daily volumes are below Belmore Lane's capacity of 1,000 vehicles per day. iii. There are approximately 240 vehicles per day currently using Belmore Lane east of John Street and there will be 350 vehicles per day if the proposed development is built. Both daily volumes are below Belmore Lane's capacity of 1,000 vehicles per day. The existing roadway network can accommodate the increased traffic from the proposed maintenance and storage facilities. No physical roadway or traffic control improvements are necessary. To minimize the impact to the residences along Belmore Lane, it is recommended: • The parking lot should be for employees only. No club members should be allowed to park in the proposed lot. • The few deliveries per week made to the facility should be scheduled for non -peak, daytime hours. • No through traffic to or from the Country Club should be allowed through the new facility. 2. Proposed Development and Study Area a. Site Location The proposed development site is located on Belmore Lane approximately 1,300 feet east of Blake Road in Edina, MN as shown in Figure 2.1. 4 gyp■ le,o�� ��, �!�.• ..,�, . ?.. Ae 00lw - e ,i . , , t� t- Proposed Interlachen 9 CC Expansion r . 7 9 M � �.twbchw C"" Cbh Figure 2.1 — Location Map �N t �. w..o.s +l-d u o. b. Land Use and Intensity The proposed development consists of a 20,000 square foot maintenance building, 4,000 square foot storage building, and 33 stall parking lot. A,',l, Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility 2 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study July, 2008 It s L. e - Draft c: Concept Plan See Appendix A for the concept plan. d. Development Phasing and Timing This study assumes the development will be fully operational in 2009. 3. Existing Traffic Conditions a. Physical Characteristics Vehicle access to the site will be provided from a single driveway on Belmore Lane. Belmore Lane is a local street under the City of Edina's jurisdiction. It is approximately 32 feet wide and does not have a posted speed limit (the speed limit defaults to 30 mph per State Statute). Parking is allowed along Belmore Lane.. Belmore Lane will be accessed by vehicles using the proposed lot via Blake Road, which is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 20. Blake Road is a two lane, undivided roadway designated as a Major Collector by Hennepin County. In the area of the proposed development the cross streets (including Belmore Lane) are stop sign controlled at Blake Road and Blake Road is free flowing. No turn lanes are provided at these intersections. b. Traffic Volumes According to Mn/DOT traffic flow maps, Blake Road had a daily traffic volume of 8,300 vehicles per day in 2005. Mn /DOT's State Aid office has assigned a 20 year growth factor of 1.2 to Hennepin County (which translates to a 0.92% compounded annual growth rate). Using this growth rate, we would expect the daily volume on Blake Road near Belmore Lane to be 8,500 vehicles per day in 2008. Mechanical counters were placed on Belmore Lane east of Blake Road and east of John Street from Wednesday, July 9t' through Sunday, July 13th. A summary of the data is shown in Tables 4.1 through 4.3. The volumes are slightly lower on the weekend. The traffic volume data by direction in one hour increments is contained in Appendix B. &�S- Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility 3 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study July, 2008 Cox - Draft - Table 4.1 — Existing Weekday Traffic Dal A.N� Pesk Hour PA Peak but . Land Usfl� r: W EBB:< W`- Land Usk. Belmore Lane east 93 Belmore Lane east [of 155 152 17 14 12 11 of Blake Road Belmore Lane east 68 Belmore Lane east 120 114 14 12 12 6 John Street Table 4.1 — Existing Weekday Traffic Table 4.2 — Existing Saturday Traffic Dai A.F*. Peak Hour . P.M. Peak Hour Lana Usk ` W8'° E8? E WO= Draft 4. Projected Traffic a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the proposed maintenance and storage facility based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. The Weekday a.m. peak hour trip generation is for the 'one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 7 -9 a.m. The Weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation is for the "one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 4 -6 p.m. The trip generation calculations for the new development are based on 33 employees using the parking lot, which is more conservative than basing the analysis on the overall square footage. This data also includes trips from delivery truck and garbage truck traffic. The resultant trip generations are shown in Table 4.1. It should be noted this trip generation is for the peak golf season. There will be significantly less traffic in the winter months when driving conditions are at their worst. Land User ITE Code Dall A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour. Enter. Exit Enter Exit Enter I Exit Single Family Home 1 Unit Removed 210 -5 -5 -0, =1 -1 -0 Maintenance /Storage 33 Employees Added 1 150 +64 +64 +12 +5 +7 +13 TOTAL TRIPS ADDED 59 59 1 12 4 S. 13 Table 4.4 Trip Generation Based on a discussion with City Staff, it is anticipated 90% of the traffic will access the parking lot via Belmore Lane to the west and Blake Road to the north. The remaining 10% will access the parking lot via Belmore Lane to the west and Blake Road to the south. This is based on the area population centers,. roadway network, and existing traffic patterns. Blake Road to Belmore Lane is the most direct route to the proposed development. There is no reason for the employees to use a more circuitous route through the adjacent neighborhood. The a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and daily trips generated by the site were assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions described above. The traffic volumes added to the Belmore Lane through this process are shown Table 4.5. Additionally, approximately 110 of the vehicles per day will be added to Blake Road north of Belmore Lane and 10 vehicles per day will be added to Blake Road south of Belmore Lane. Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility 5 t' Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study A41 July, 2008 Aw Draft= ' ' ' ;- �3•' s° : _" Dal;: A:N Peak Hour P.N Peak Houk. Lary# Usk Wt r E 4 .. 6and 214 211 21 26 25 17 of Blake Road Belmore Lane east 59 59 4 12 13 6 of Blake Road 173 18 24 25 12 of John Street Belmore Lane east 59 59 4 12 13 6 of John Street Table 4.5 — Existing Weekday Traffic b. Total Traffic with Development Traffic forecasts were developed for the Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development, as shown in Table 4.5 to the existing volumes shown in Tables 4.1 through 4.3. The resultant Build traffic forecasts are shown in Tables 4.6 through 4.8. Additionally, it is anticipated Blake Road will cant' 8,600 vehicles per day at Belmore Lane after completion of the proposed development. r= r =Yy �' '" i =' a f _Dal >: A.N1► Weak Hour P.K Peak kout L 4 LanaUsgp.; ww-, r. E is, WFw .. 6and Belmore Lane east 214 211 21 26 25 17 of Blake Road of Blake Road Belmore Lane east 179 173 18 24 25 12 of John Street of John Street Table 4.6 — Weekday Traffic with Development Table 4.7 — Saturday Traffic with Development Qalf -':. A.Illk Peak Hour- PA. Peak Hour LanaUsgp.; ww-, r. E is, Wes: E 1I1If E6... Belmore Lane east 152 150 13 25 19 16 of Blake Road Belmore Lane east Belmore Lane east 127 127 14 22 15 11 of John Street Table 4.7 — Saturday Traffic with Development Table 4.8 — Sunday Traffic with Development 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis b. Build Out Capacity Analysis As previously discussed, the capacity of Blake Road is approximately 10,000 vehicles per day and the capacity of Belmore Lane is approximately 1,000 vehicles per day. Blake Road will carry Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility 6 Q Edina, MN Tra,�c Impact Study A % July, 2008 Dail '_ :: A:IN Peak.lfiou0 . PJ Peak Hour_ f Land Belmore Lane east 164 167 12 17 25 12 of Blake Road Belmore Lane east 152 156 9 17 19, 12 of John Street Table 4.8 — Sunday Traffic with Development 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis b. Build Out Capacity Analysis As previously discussed, the capacity of Blake Road is approximately 10,000 vehicles per day and the capacity of Belmore Lane is approximately 1,000 vehicles per day. Blake Road will carry Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility 6 Q Edina, MN Tra,�c Impact Study A % July, 2008 Draft MW approximately 8,600 vehicles per day near Belmore Lane after the development is built. Belmore Lane will carry approximately 430 vehicles per day east of Blake Road and 350 vehicles per day east of John Street after the development is built. Both roads will operate below capacity after the development is built. c. Travel Demand Management Plan For analysis purposes, it is assumed the peak hour traffic will occur at the same time as the roadway peak hours. This results in the most conservative analysis. The parking lot will be primarily for grounds crews who typically arrive and leave outside of the typical rush hours. To minimize the impact to the residences along Belmore Lane, it is recommended: • The parking lot should be for employees only. No club members should. be allowed to park in the proposed lot. • The few deliveries per week made to the facility should be scheduled for non -peak, daytime hours. • No through traffic to or from the Country Club should be allowed through the new facility. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations Blake Road and Belmore Lane currently have daily traffic volumes below each road's capacity. Both roads will have daily traffic volumes below capacity after the proposed development -is built. No physical improvements to the transportation network are required to accommodate the proposed development's traffic. To minimize the impact to the residences along Belmore Lane, it is recommended: • The parking lot should be for employees only. No club members should be allowed to park in the proposed lot. • The few deliveries per week made to the facility should be scheduled for non -peak, daytime hours. • No through traffic to or from the Country Club should be allowed through the new facility. 7. Appendix a. Concept Plan b. Traffic counts X0 Interlachen CC Maintenance Facility 7 Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study July, 2008 /D Draft Appendix A Concept Plan &sa "Draft" 'a Appendix B Traffic Counts A15j- Da AM 11:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 08:00 07:00 Traffic Data Inc. 07:00 07:00 Draft Page 1 07:00 07:00 Peak 10 13 17 23 952.926.0916 14 13 13 8 Site Code: 000022681101 12 12 Vol. PM 17:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 Belmore Lane east of Blake Rd 12:00 12:00 Peak Vol. 15 14 15 21 10 12 10 11 12 Edina, MN 11 13 Thu Fri Sat Sun Week Average Start 07- Ju{-O6 Tue Wed WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB E Time WB EB WB EB 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 AM . • 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 " • 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 04:00 ' ' 1 3 0 0 1 4 2 05:00 ' 7 0 4 6 6 4 3 0 1 06:00 07:00 ' • " .r ^` ' l,7.,. 14 9 13 13:.;, 4, :.:.4.,.._.• 9 8: 08:00 ` 11 jfz," 4 5 10 7 2 1 4 2 5 4 09:00 7 7 5 6 8 7 10:00 11:00 ` _.,'; .vim +_. ..: 13 �Z �� ,, 5 5 12:00 . 12 13 1� t 8r� 9 6 ` PM 7 12 ,�:�u s,�.�r�1:. . 11 5 7 11 6 3 7 8 ' 8 8' 8 01:M • • g 8 11 10 „F:- �.; : 0' 1 3 9 5 :r 8 9 02:00 03:00 • 10 ,;,' >14 4 10 6 9 8 9 6 4 6 5 6 9 4 5 6 8 6 04:00 ` ` ` 12 a�� 7 11 12 4 12 11 5 5 4 6 <. 6 10 8 6 7 0:00 5 05:00 ` ; 7 10 6 7 6 4 6 10 3 6` 6 3 4 5 6 07:00 3 7 9 8 7 5 5 10 9 2 9 5 4 4 3 9 9 5 7 08:00 � 3 6 5 4 3 3 4 2 3 10 4 4 09:00 W 10:00 ' 8 3 3 3 3 6 2 3 1 3 6 21 4 3 1 11:00 0 21 116 1 01 155 152 3 144 21 137 2 93 1 91 105 108 127 127 0 0 103 Lane 0 0 0 0 219 307 281 184 213 254 Da AM 11:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 08:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 Peak 10 13 17 23 18 14 13 13 8 6 12 12 Vol. PM 17:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 Peak Vol. 15 14 15 21 10 12 10 11 12 10 11 13 Traffic Data Inc. 952.926.0916 - Draft - Page 1 Site Code: 000022681301 Belmore Lane east of John St Edina, MN Start 07- 1ul-08 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Week Average Time EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB 12:00 0 0 0 0 83 78 114 120 105 105 66 68 54 to of as Day 0 0 161 234 AM 210 ' 136 0 0 0 0 AM 0 0 2 1 08:00 0 0 01.00 f • • • 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.00 Vol. 7 l0 14 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 PM 0 0 03:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 12 :00 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 04:00 • 1 1 0 0 14 0 1 2 0 11 1 0 05:00 f • ' 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 06:00 ` • 0 2 6 4 3 2 1 0 2 2 07:00 a 12 's �Sxr 1n- 11 12 08:00 8 9 „,iz 10 5 3 4 4 7 6 09:00 ' 3 2 6 8 2 3 3 5 4 4 10:00 5 7 4 4 11 a '• �. 2 3 'A ='AM& 4 6 6 11:00 • ,�.a;;I�r:: ',:- a4 7 6 7 4 5 4 5 7 7 12:00• 01:00 9 2 5 7 9 4 2 5 6 7 5 02:00 4 5 7 12 1 ;,,mi ;sue 3 1 8 5 5 6 03:00 ' 10 8 10 3 5 6 5 2 4 2 7 4 04:00 ' 6 10 3 10 5 7 3 4 5 3 4 7 05:00 ` • ' �;;�;'.�;;;.::_., 6 12 2 2 2 5 6 6 5 7 06:00 ,., 6 4 5 5 3 4 5 2 6 6 5 4 07:00 4 2 5 4 7 5 3 3 2 2 4 3 08:00 6 5 7 5 4 2 3 1 6 6 5 4 09:00 5 3 4 4 4 4 1 2 8 2 4 3 10:00 ` 2 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 11:00 2 01 0 1 1 2 31 1 2 2':= 1 3 Lane 0 0 0 0 83 78 114 120 105 105 66 68 54 to of as Day 0 0 161 234 210 136 176 190 AM 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 08:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Peak Vol. 7 l0 14 14 12 13 10 10 6 5 10 10 PM 17:00 17:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 12 :00 12:00 13:00 - 23:00 12:00 12:00 Peak Vol. 11 12 14 12 9 7 11 11 9 7 9 8 PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 8 Flannery stated she Id be willing to meet i dh all neighbors, and has met with neighbors in the pasfincllu g the Leffler ,',Chair Lonsbury asked Ms. Flannery if the townhomes have on -sit securityy. ,,,,,Ms. Flannery responded in the affirmative. Mr. Dorgan addressed the Commis. on`a request to allow them time to meet and "re expressed by the neighbors and the Com Commission Action asked them to defer action on their ,w the concerns and suggestions Commissioner Brown.nr oved to table 2008.0012. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion: ,All voted aye; motion carried. 2008.0013 Conditional Use Permit Interlachen Country Club 6200 Interlachen Boulevard Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Interlachen Country Club is proposing to build two new maintenance buildings on property adjacent to and owned by the Country Club, and in the current Belmore Lane right -of -way. The site exists today with two single - family homes and the cul -de -sac for Belmore Lane. The two homes would be removed, and Belmore Lane would be shortened, and reconstructed. The main building would be 20,000 square feet in size, and the second building would be 2,600 square feet in size. Planner Teague explained access to the maintenance building would be from an existing interior road off Interlachen Boulevard and Waterman Avenue. An emergency vehicle access and gate is proposed at the end of Belmore Lane. The applicant originally was proposing a public access to the new facilities off of Belmore Lane. However, revised the plans after concern was raised by the neighbors who did not want additional traffic brought through their neighborhood. Planner Teague noted the request requires a Conditional Use Permit and a Vacation of a portion of Belmore Lane. The roadway Vacation would be considered when the City Council considers the Conditional Use Permit. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build new maintenance facilities at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for the Interlachen Country Club based on the following findings: 4S-r PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 9 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 2, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped September 2, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped September 2, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped September 2, 2008. • Cul -de -sac reconstruction plan date stamped September 19, 2008. 2. The City Council must approve the Vacation of the end of Belmore Lane. 3. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City will require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 4. The Belmore Lane cul -de -sac must be re- designed and reconstructed by the applicant per city standards. Final re- construction plans shall be subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 5. Access from Belmore Lane shall be used by emergency vehicles only. The gate located at the entrance to the site shall remain locked, and not be used by members or employees of the club. 6. Belmore Lane may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. 7. The buildings must meet all applicable building permit requirements: 8. All conditions required by the. city engineer in his memo dated September 25, 2008. 9. Record the approving resolution with the county. Appearing for the Applicant Truman Howell, Lyle Ward, George Carroll, Peter Boosalis, Mark Kretchman Applicant Presentation Mr. Howell introduced members of Interlachen Country Club development team. Mr. Boosalis, 7718 Lochmere Terrace, addressed the Commission and informed them the Country Club held neighborhood meetings to inform neighbors of the their plans to construct two new maintenance buildings. Mr. Boosalis said their. goal is to be a good neighbor, adding after further study and input from neighbors the Club revised their original plan to eliminate vehicle access to the course from Belmore Lane. Mr. Boosalis concluded the Interlachen team is available to answer questions from the Commission. AsG PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 10 Chair Losnbury invited the public to speak. Public Comment Dennis Hogan, 6204 Belmore Lane, asked the Commission to deny the Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Hogan said this type of facility is industrial, not residential, and our immediate neighborhood will change as a result of'this proposal. Mr. Hogan also noted that he believes the new buildings will generate more noise because of the number of employees that will use these facilities and the industrial use of equipment stored in the maintenance building. Concluding, Mr. Hogan stated he also believes neighborhood property values will be negatively impacted if the CUP is approved. Richard Windham, 6333 Belmore Lane, told the Commission his major concern was with traffic. Mr. Windham added he does have a concern with the emergency vehicle gate at the end of the cul de sac and what could happen if the gate is accidently left open. Mr. Windham said he is also concerned with the number of caddies that work at the golf course, adding he believes Interlachen has at least 75 caddies and a number of them walk down Belmore Lane or are dropped off at the end of the street to access the club house. Concluding, Mr. Windham acknowledged Interlachen Country Club is a good neighbor. He noted the Country Club has indicated to neighbors that they will leave an access open to the course to view the fireworks and cross country ski in the winter months. Mary McDonald, 6216 Belmore Lane, told the Commission there are 39 residential properties that make up this neighborhood. Ms. McDonald acknowledged that the Country Club has held a number of meetings with regard to this project. Ms. McDonald said she has a concern with the proposed building materials adding structures with metal siding have a more warehouse appearance and will be noisier. Ms. McDonald stated she also is concerned with caddy drop off or caddies walking or riding their bikes down Belmore to gain access to the golf course. Continuing, Ms. McDonald stressed that the neighborhood wants assurances that caddies, deliveries, employees, patrons and visitors do not use Belmore Lane to access the golf course. Ms. McDonald presented a graphic that indicated golf courses that do not have their maintenance buildings as close to residential properties as the proposed maintenance buildings; the courses are Bear Path, Braemar, Edina Country Club, Fred Richards, Minikanda and North Oaks. Ms. McDonald also told the Commission that recently a crime was committed in this neighborhood, adding this is a quiet neighborhood and more traffic is a concern. Ms. McDonald concluded that noise is also a concern. Mr. Ted Volk, 6301 Belmore Lane, told the Commission his concern is with preserving as many trees as possible and planting additional landscaping to minimize impact of the maintenance building. Mr. Volk said he also wants A517 PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 11 assurances that the proposed gate at the end of Belmore Lane is used only by emergency'vehicles period. He stated he doesn't want to see this access used as an entry or exit to the course by employees. Concluding, Mr. Volk stated overall he can support the project; however, he reiterated he wants the landscaping planted as presented this evening. Kevin Shaw, 6220 Belmore Lane, told the Commission the vast majority of neighbors support the project as presented. Mr. Shaw reported the neighbors and the Club have worked closely over the last few months to get to this point. Plans have been revised and the revised plan presented this evening is the outcome of the neighbors and Club working together. Mr. Shaw acknowledged that change is always difficult, adding that Mr. Hogan on behalf of his parents has not "signed off' on the plan presented by Interlachen. Mary McDonald, 6216 Belmore Lane, told the Board with regard to the neighborhood there are five or six families that have no opinion on what the Country Club does; however, the majority of neighbors do have concerns. Ms. McDonald acknowledged Interlachen has been a good neighbor. Mr. Hogan, representing his parents at 6204 Belmore Lane, requested that the Planning Commission table this issue to allow him time to meet with representatives from the Country Club to go over concerns he still has with this project. Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Comments Chair Lonsbury noted that Interlachen and neighborhood residents have met on numerous occasions and at this time the Commission will address the concerns that were expressed by residents and concerns that the Commission may have. Chair Lonsbury said he believes the initial concern of the neighborhood was traffic and access off Belmore Lane into the golf course. Chair Lonsbury noted the revised plan indicates that only emergency vehicles can access the golf course from Belmore Lane. Continuing, Chair Lonsbury reported that Interlachen Country Club has petitioned the City Council to vacate the right -of -way portion at the end of Belmore Lane. That action will be a public hearing before the City Council sometime in November. Chair Lonsbury noted another concern expressed by residents is that caddies for Interlachen Country Club would access the caddy shack via Belmore Lane. Chair Lonsbury said he doesn't know how this would be guaranteed not to occur. Chair Lonsbury asked Planner Teague if the City required that Interlachen provide an emergency access point at this location. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Chair Lonsbury commented that since the City in a sense is PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 12 dictating emergency access at this point the City should retain control over the right -of -way. Planner Teague interjected and explained if the right -of -way isn't vacated there would be no project, at least not as presented. The request includes removal of the two single family homes owned by Interlachen at the end of Belmore Lane and vacating the right -of -way. Commissioners acknowledged that the neighbors and Country Club have made great strides, The increased landscaping, and revised cul de sac; however the proposal will be a change. Applicant Response Lyle Ward told the Commission they will do their best, do whatever it takes, to discourage traffic on Belmore Lane. Mr. Ward stressed the only reason for, the gate at the end of Belmore Lane is for emergency vehicle access. Mr. Ward said the Club will instruct their caddies to use the main entrance when walking, riding their bikes or being dropped off. Mr. Ward said if so desired the Club will put up a fence to prevent any access to the golf course from Belmore. Mr. Ward -also pointed out Interlachen Country Club was constructed in 1910 and there are difficuities in updating the course, noting the course is virtually land locked. Continuing, Mr. Ward pointed out the current location of the maintenance building is in the parking lot and this can be dangerous for everyone. Concluding, Mr. Ward said there are other golf courses within the metropolitan area with maintenance buildings in close proximity to residential properties. Commission Action Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions excluding the vacation of the right -of -way. Approval is also based on the agreements between the Club and neighbors dated September 25, 2008. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. A discussion ensued between Commissioners with regard to right -of -way. A number of Commissioners felt a revised vacation of the right -of -way would allow the project to proceed while leaving the City in "charge of the gate ". It was reiterated during this discussion that the City of Edina Police and Fire are the bodies. dictating emergency access off Belmore Lane. Commissioner Brown pointed out if anyone visits the Club during events they would realize how congested the parking lot and circulation element is, adding he would think the Commission would also be concerned with maintaining the safety of visitors and employees of the Club. Concluding, Commissioner Brown said in his opinion emergency vehicles should be provided with the safest and best access possible and Police and Fire have indicated a gate at the end of Belmore Lane is needed to service the Club if an emergency should arise. A�l PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 13 Commissioner Schroeder stated he can't support the motion as presented because he believes there is no reason for not vacating the right -of -way as requested. - Commissioner Schroeder pointed out public right -of -ways are just that, public. If the right -of -way isn't vacated as proposed that means there is a public use and the neighborhood has indicated they do not want the public to have access to, or to park in this area. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out the City can't prevent people from driving, biking or walking down Belmore Lane — so why not vacate the right -of -way. Chair Lonsbury noted the City dictated emergency access at this point, so maybe the City should control it. Commissioner Forrest stated she cannot support the Conditional Use Permit as presented because in her opinion it fails to meet the criteria in granting a CUP. Continuing, Commissioner Forrest said the noise from employees and smells from machinery will give this area a more industrial feel. Commissioner Forrest said the City is also very careful with "losing" public land and if the vacation is allowed, the City can't get it back. Ayes, Fischer, Brown, Lonsbury. Nay; Risser, Staunton, Schroeder, Forrest. Motion for approval failed. Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit noting the criteria for approval of a Conditional Use Permit has failed. Commissioner Risser seconded the motion. . Commissioner Brown commented that he believes a disservice is being done to the Country Club, he pointed out at previous meetings the major focus of the neighborhood was to prevent access to the course from Belmore Lane by maintenance vehicles, etc. Commissioner Brown said it now appears there are a number of different issues, building materials, landscaping, etc. Ayes; Risser, Staunton, Forrest. Nays; Schroeder, Fischer, Brown, Lonsbury. Motion to deny failed. Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff findings, and subject to staff conditions. Approval is also subject to neighbor and lnterlachen Country Club conditions dated September 25, 2008. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Ayes; Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Brown. Nays; Risser, Forrest, Lonsbury. Motion Carried. Chair Lonsbury explained his negative vote was because he believes the City should control as much of the right -of -way as possible. PUBLIC COMMENT: No additional public comment. AV D PC Minutes October 1, 2008 Page 14 Ill. PUBLIC COMMENT: No additional public comment. IV. INTERGOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS: Update on Utility Shed for Edina Public Schools: Planner Teague informed Commissioners the School District and City staff met to discuss the possibility of locating their utility shed in the area of the Creek Valley Elementary School Park. Planner Teague said this site is a city park site; however, it's mainly used by the District. The School District will apply for a Conditional Use Permit for this location sometime in the future. Chair Lonsbury acknowledged the back of the packet materials. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 PM W lanning Commission Minute Summary nuary 28, 2008 We3of14 Can the maintenance building be pushed back to eliminate the ga between the building wall and the fence — the rear of the propos building could create an attractive nuisance — In respo a to their questions Commissioners were informed: • The for of the new maintenance building will be en to match the existin field buildings. • The bo shape of the new building best suits square footage of the building t ccommodate the storage of equ' ent and vehicles. • The locatio f the new building provides er vehicle access off the parking lot. It as pointed out if the pro sed building was positioned to line up with the her buildings it wou 't easily fit. . • With regard to cr ting an attractiv uisance for kids to congregate behind the building etween the ilding and fence the district indicated their willingness to a a light- ck in that area. Commission Action Commissioner Grabiel askeqAe s \ntrai trict to take another look at the landscaping proposed to s een thnance building and suggested larger plantings. Commissioner Gra also noted tusly the school district appeared before the Com ion request ing ti al Use Permit to construct the maintenance b ding on the east sstr property (Concord Avenue). At that meeting mmissioners suggt th istrict "re- locate" the maintenan building near the foot. Com 'ssioner Grabiel thanked the district f complying with that sugg CogAissioner Grabiel moved to recommend CondirVnal Use Permit aggroval based on staff findings and subject to staff knditions. ommissioner Staunton seconded the motion. All vote aye; motion carried. 2008.0013.09a Conditional Use Permit Interlachen Country Club 6200 Interlachen Boulevard, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the Interlachen Country Club is proposing to build two new maintenance buildings on property adjacent to and owned by the Country Club, and in the current Belmore Lane right -of -way. The site exists today with two single - family homes and the cul -de -sac for Belmore Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 4 of 14 Lane. The two homes would be removed, and Belmore Lane would be shortened, and reconstructed. The main building would be 20,000 square feet in size, and the second building would be 2,600 square feet in size. Planner Teague explained that access to the maintenance building would be from an existing interior road off Interlachen Boulevard and Waterman Avenue. An emergency vehicle access and gate is proposed at the end of Belmore Lane. The applicant originally proposed a public access to the new facilities off of Belmore Lane. However, revised the plans after concern was raised by the neighbors who did not want additional traffic brought through their neighborhood. Planner Teague clarified that the request requires the following: 1. Conditional Use Permit. A Conditional Use Permit is required to expand the golf course and parking area. 2. Lot Division. A Lot Division is requested to shift the lot line that separates 6200 and 6204 Belmore Lane. The Lot Division does not create a new lot. Land would be given to the adjacent lot, north of the proposed maintenance builidng, in exchange for land west of the maintenance building. 3. Roadway Vacation. As mentioned Belmore Lane is requested to be shortened, which requires a Vacation. This would be considered by the City Council when it considers the Conditional Use Permit and Lot Division. Continuing, Planner Teague told the Commission this application is essentially the same as the previous request reviewed by the Planning Commission in October of 2008, with the exception of a Lot Division. Planner Teague recommended that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to build new maintenance facilities at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for the Interlachen Country Club based on the following findings. 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped December 30, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped December 30, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped December 30, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped December 30, 2008. A3 M Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 5 of 14 • Cul -de -sac reconstruction plan date stamped December 30, 2008. • Lighting plan date stamped December 30, 2008. 2. The City Council must approve the Vacation of the end of Belmore Lane. 3. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City will require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 4. The Belmore Lane cul -de -sac must be re- designed and reconstructed by the applicant per city standards. Final re- construction plans shall be subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 5. Access from Belmore Lane shall be used by emergency vehicles only. The gate located at the entrance to the site shall remain locked, and not be used by members or employees of the club. 6. Belmore Lane may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. 7. The buildings must meet all applicable building permit requirements. 8. All conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated January 20, 2009. 9. Record the approving resolution with the county. Concluding Planner Teague stated staff also recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division to shift lot lines with the adjacent property. Appearing for the Applicant Lyle Ward, Craig Christianson, Gary Zumberg, Donald Ross Applicant Presentation Mr. Ward addressed the Commission informing them interlachen Country Club (ICC) was founded in 1909 and is having its 100 year anniversary. Mr. Ward explained that presently Interlachen Country Club serves 750 families and of those 750 families 450 live in Edina. Mr. Ward said Interlachen is an old city course and is considered one of the top 100 courses in the country. Mr. Ward reported in 1930 ICC hosted the US Open and in 2008 hosted the US Women's Open. Continuing, Mr. Ward said ICC and the City of Edina have a great history of working well together. Mr. Ward explained that the current project is necessary. He pointed out the maintenance facility is 50 years old and in very poor condition. The building also presents safety issues for employees. Concluding, Mr. Ward stated the goal of ICC is to construct a safe, modern and efficient maintenance facility. Mr. Christianson with the aid of graphics began his presentation by pointing out ICC is surrounded by a number of residential neighborhoods that "grew up" around the golf course. Mr. Christianson explained that the current maintenance building sits at the edge of the parking lot and was constructed in 1964. Mr. A* Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 6 of 14 Christian said the present building is inadequate for the clubs maintenance needs and housing ICC's ground employees. Mr. Christianson said during the summer months ICC has roughly 30 employees that have to share a 300 square foot locker room with one toilet. Mr. Christianson said this is difficult when the employees are both male and female. Continuing, Mr. Christianson pointed out the changes that were made to the larger maintenance building. The garage doors now face the golf course, not the residential neighborhood and the wash area has also been shifted away from the residential area. Landscaping has also been increased to screen the buildings and parking area from the residential neighborhood. Mr. Christianson noted questions have been raised on where the "best place" is to construct the maintenance facilities. With the aid of graphics (developed by Mr. Farber) Mr. Christianson pointed out that the majority of the alternative sites wouldn't work. Two of the five sites (Option "C" and "D ") are located in an area of steep slopes, have limited access, with no parking or emergency vehicle access. One site (Option "B ") is immediately adjacent to Interlachen Boulevard and a residential home with no parking or emergency vehicle access. Mr. Christianson said two other sites (Proposed and Option "A ") would work. One is in the location presented this evening and the other site is between two ponds. Mr. Christianson stated he believes the proposed location is best. Concluding, Mr. Christianson informed the Commission ICC held a number of neighborhood meetings and after receiving input developed the plan before the Commission this evening. Mr. Zumberg said his primary concern was to assess the proposed lot division and how it would impact the Hogan property and ICC. Mr. Zumberg noted ICC has worked closely with the Hogan family, developing a plan acceptable to the Hogan's. Mr. Zumberg stated he believes the division as proposed enhances the Hogan property by providing better views of the golf course. Concluding, Mr. Zumberg said he has found in his assessments that properties in close proximity to golf courses have higher values as a result of their proximity to the course. Comments and Questions from the Commission Commissioners raised the following questions: Who is responsible for the gate and its maintenance Does this proposal require a Environmental Impact Study How will the removal of the residential homes and reconfiguration of the cul de sac occur. Will a variance be required for the fence and what will the landscaping and fence materials be. In response to issues raised Commissioners were informed: AS— on Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 7 of 14 • A gate would be provided. at the entrance off the reconstructed cul -de -sac and it will remain locked. Only emergency vehicles access is permitted. The gate will be controlled by the City. Employees and Country Club members would not be allowed to gain access to the course off Belmore Lane. (This is a condition of approval) • An Environment Impact Study is not required for this project; however, a Minnehaha Watershed District Permit would be required. • Two single family homes will be removed (owned by ICC) and Belmore Lane would be shortened and reconfigured. • Planner Teague indicated he would review the proposed fence and City Code to determine if a variance is needed. Arborvitae, Honeysuckle and Dogwood would also be planted along the lot line to screen the parking lot and maintenance buildings. Overstory trees (Lindens) would also be planted. Oaks and Spruce are proposed at the edge of the wetland. Chair Fischer opened -the public hearing. Public Comment Stuart Eiger, attorney representing Ms. McDonald and neighbors stated his clients are opposed to the City granting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct maintenance buildings at the end of Belmore Lane. Mr. Eiger said the placement of the proposed maintenance buildings only benefit ICC. Mr. Eiger said there is no evidence that the construction of these maintenance buildings will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents. Continuing, Mr. Eiger noted that the views presently enjoyed by residents will now be obstructed by a parking lot and industrial buildings. Concluding, Mr. Eiger stated the proposed maintenance buildings will reduce the property values of the homes along Belmore Lane, and asked the Commission to deny the requested CUP. Damon Farber gave a presentation on alternative locations to construct the maintenance buildings. Mr. Faber said in his opinion the best location is Option A. Concluding, Mr. Farber pointed out Option A is located between the two water bodies off of Kresse Drive where a maintenance building already exists. Mr. Farber stated at least to him Option A makes the most sense. Bill Weides, appraiser told the Commission he has appraised many properties near golf courses and believes if constructed as proposed the 28 foot high, metal, low class maintenance building will significantly impact the properties on Belmore Lane. JoAnne Smaby, realtor, explained as a realtor she determines home value, adding she believes the property values in this neighborhood would be harmed if this proposal is approved and the maintenance buildings are constructed as submitted. A4 7 Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 8 of 14 Mr. Windham, 6233 Belmore Lane, told the Commission he's still concerned that traffic will increase on Belmore Lane as a result of this proposal. Mr. Windham acknowledged that ICC has indicated that the proposed gate is only for emergency vehicle access; however, he is still concerned that others will choose to use this as an access point. Paul Hedblom, 6205 Spruce Road, told the Commission his concern is with property values. Mr. Hedblom questioned why the new maintenance buildings couldn't be built in the area known as the "chicken farm ", adding this location was also recommended by Mr. Farber (Option A) as the location that makes the most sense. Mr. Hedblom reiterated he believes if constructed as presented his property value would be negatively impacted. Ms. Donovan, 317 John Street, told the Commission she lives in a sleepy neighborhood, adding that she agrees with Mr. Hedbloms suggestion that the new maintenance buildings should be constructed in the "chicken shack/farm" area. Concluding, Ms. Donovan stated her concern is with property values and the potential for noise, asking the Commission to vote "No" on ICC's request for a Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Marshall, 305 John Street, explained she moved into this neighborhood for the quiet. Ms. Marshall stated now she is very concerned that "quiet" will be broken by the noise emitted from industrial use buildings. Ms. Marshall added another concern she has is the potential for caddy's (walking or dropped off) to use the "gate" to gain access to the course. Concluding, Ms. Marshall said she also believes Belmore Lane shouldn't be the only street burdened by emergency vehicles. Mr. Bennett, 6229 Belmore Lane asked the Commission to consider the opinions of the individual property owners and deny the request as submitted. Mr. Thomas Meehan, 315 Grove Place informed Commissioners he is very opposed to this project. Mr. Meehan stated he is entitled to a quiet peaceful existence, pointing out the general public doesn't belong to ICC. Mr. Meehan asked the Commission to preserve his enjoyment of the neighborhood by denying the CUP. Robert Schweitzer, 305 Grove Place, asked the Commission to deny the request, adding if constructed the buildings would lower his property value. Stuart Lind, 301 Grove Place, stated he believes this proposal will generate noise in a very quiet neighborhood. Concluding, Mr. Lind said the noise from the buildings would be a nuisance and the proposed landscaping will not stop the noise. Al Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 9 of 14 Jill Rivard, 6224 Belmore Lane, stated her monetary worth is in her property value and this proposal will lower that value. Ms. Rivard said she is also very concerned with the storage of chemicals proposed for the second maintenance building. Barb Swanson, 308 Grove Place, stated her concern is with the storage of industrial chemicals in the smaller of the two proposed buildings. Ted Volk, 6301 Belmore Lane suggested that the Commission deny the CUP. Mr. Volk stated that the majority of residents in the immediate area object to the proposal. Monica McDonald, 6216 Belmore Lane referred to research she did on golf courses in the metropolitan area, suggesting that construction of industrial buildings so close to residential properties is not the norm. Ms. McDonald stated in her opinion the proposed buildings will be an eyesore. Cheryl Bristol, 6208 Belmore Lane, pointed out if ICC constructs the maintenance building as proposed her view will be of tin buildings (one overly large), adding in her opinion nothing would adequately screen them. Mary McDonald, 6216 Belmore Lane, respectfully requested that the Commission deny the Conditional Use Permit. Ms. McDonald pointed out if approved nearby residents would be subjected to light standards and noise from the lawn mowers, and other maintenance machinery. Concluding, Ms. McDonald said in her opinion the scale of the largest building is overpowering. Greg Wilson, 6320 Belmore Lane, said the Belmore neighborhood is a tight knit community and if this CUP is approved the neighborhood won't be the same. Mr. Wilson suggested that if approved no pedestrian, car or truck traffic should be allowed on Belmore Lane to access the golf course. Mr. Wilson also asked that if approved special attention is paid to the type of lighting installed. Concluding, Mr. Wilson pointed out ICC doesn't.keep the current maintenance areas free of clutter, adding what would make this maintenance area any different. Mr. Tim Schields, attorney representing Dr. and Mrs. Hogan said originally the Hogan's objected to the proposal, but since that time the Hogan's and ICC have come to a mutual agreement. Mr. Schields acknowledged that ICC has been a good neighbor allowing the neighborhood access to the course during different times. Mr. Schields concluded that he doesn't know why the cul de sac is even needed, pointing out Belmore Lane will end and the gate will be setback even farther. Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. A`f OJ Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 10 of 14 Comments and questions from the Commission Chair Fischer said one issue that was raised was about the proposed gate. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague if this type of gate has ever been used before. Planner Teague responded that to the best of his knowledge this type of gate hasn't been used in Edina; however, both the police and fire departments are familiar with this type of gate and believe this is the best approach to gain access to the course. Commissioner Forrest said she is concerned that if an emergency were to occur in the proposed maintenance area that the City's emergency responders are the only ones able to open the gate. Chair Fischer interjected noting a resident questioned why emergency vehicles are even allowed to access the course via Belmore Lane. Planner Teague explained it is very important to be able to provide an adequate timed response to emergencies that could arise at this end of the course. Planner Teague explained the fire department in particular doesn't want to weave through the Clubs parking lot if an emergency would occur in this area. Commissioner Risser asked Planner Teague if any research was given to the alternative locations referred to this evening. Planner Teague responded that City Staff recently received the alternative locations and to date hasn't assessed their merit. Chair Fischer noted the Planning Commission heard a similar request from the Club in October. Fewer residents attended that meeting, and the focus was on ]CC working with the Hogan's to develop a plan that would be acceptable to them. Continuing, Chair Fischer reported after three votes the Commission did approve the requested CUP. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague if that approval still stands. Planner Teague responded that ICC withdrew that application, adding this proposal is a completely new application. Commissioner Brown commented that clarification needs to be made on the term being used "whole /entire neighborhood ", pointing out the Belmore neighborhood is only one of the neighborhoods situated around the golf course. Commissioner Brown said he is uncomfortable with the dialogue thus far, noting the presence of attorneys, appraisers, etc. creates adversarial positions. Chair Fischer told the Commission when he walked the area he observed that the area known as the "chicken farm" appears to be naturally screened by a berm. Chair Fischer commented if the CUP is approved as recommended could the height of the larger building be lowered or the entire building lowered to reduce the impact from Belmore Lane. Commissioner Grabiel said he doesn't question the need for a new maintenance building, one is needed; however, there seems to be other sites available that are A61 10 Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 11 of 14 less intrusive. Continuing, Commissioner Grabiel said he walked the site and believes property values are tied to the views and the views for the residents on Belmore Lane would change if this CUP is approved as presented. Concluding, Commissioner Grabiel said in his opinion this proposal has no public benefit, adding he believes the suggested location would create a nuisance for the neighborhood. Commissioner Grabiel stated he cannot support the proposal as submitted. Commissioner Brown commented that if the proposed location can't be supported how could an alternative location be supported. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out this Conditional Use Permit request is different from others because what actually is happening is that R -1 residential lots are being changed from a residential use to a non - residential use. Commissioner Schroeder acknowledged that the Club is also zoned R -1; however, it can be argued that by approving this CUP the Commission would be changing the character of the neighborhood by allowing the removal of single family homes and replacing them with industrial buildings. Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion this location would have had more merit if access to the golf course would come from Belmore Lane, but when that access was eliminated other locations should have been pursued. Commissioner Forrest stated she agrees with Commissioner Grabiel, new maintenance buildings are needed; however, the one proposed is overly large and impacts the Belmore neighborhood. Commissioner Staunton said what he understood from the presentations by both Mr. Christianson and Mr. Faber was that three of the suggested locations for the maintenance buildings wouldn't work and two would. One is in the location before the Commission this evening and the other is Option A near /in the "chicken farm" area. Continuing, Commissioner Staunton said he was also struck by the size of the larger maintenance building, reiterating it's big. Commissioner Staunton commented if ICC would entertain the suggestion of locating the maintenance buildings in the "chicken farm" area (Option A) how would that impact the neighbors on Kresse Circle, pointing out the Commission may hear the same type of opposition from that neighborhood. Concluding, Commissioner Staunton suggested that the size of the larger building be reduced, noting there is merit in locating the maintenance buildings in an area where one already exists. Commissioner Scherer commented that regardless of the need for new maintenance facilities in her opinion the size of the larger building is just too much. Commissioner Scherer said she is also disappointed with the facade and exterior building materials used on the proposed maintenance buildings, adding they need to be "dressed up ". k76 11 Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 12 of 14 The discussion continued with Commissioners acknowledging that ICC did respond to their suggestions from the October meeting; however, in the opinion of the majority of Commissioners the proposed maintenance buildings could be situated in a different location, pointing out the area between the ponds already house a maintenance building and that may be the logical location for these buildings. It was noted by representatives of ICC that the size of the larger building is the result of consolidating all other maintenance buildings. The discussion continued with representatives requesting that the Commission table their request to allow them time to review their options. Commission Action Commissioner Schroeder (at the request of the applicant Interlacheh Country Club) moved to table 2008.0018.09a to an unspecified date with the requirement that the applicant provide the City with a letter waiving the 120 day requirement. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. Commissioner Brown suggested that the neighbors and applicant work together to find some common ground. All voted aye; motion to table 2008.0018.09a approved. III. INTERGOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS: Election of Vice Chair: Commissioner Brown moved to nominate Kevin Staunton as Vice - Chair. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. Chair Fischer asked Commissioners if there are any other nominations. Being none Chair Fischer called for the vote. All voted aye to approve the nomination and elect Commissioner Staunton as Vice - Chair. Chair Fischer told Commissioners he would like to set as a goal for 2009 that the Commission re- evaluate the Zoning Ordinance and amend the Ordinance where appropriate. Commissioner Scherer told Commissioners that in looking back over the past three years she found she is very proud of some projects and not so proud of others. Commissioner Scherer opined that as the Commission moves forward it may be appropriate to also look backward, focusing on past projects, good and 471 12 Planning Commission Minute Summary January 28, 2008 Page 13 of 14 bad. Commissioner Scherer suggested scheduling a work session on "re- visiting" past actions. Chair Fischer stated he thinks that's a good idea which could include a bus tour. Advisory Board Updates: Commissioner Risser liaison to the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) informed the Commission the EEC has submitted two Senior May -Term projects to the Edina High School. Commissioner Brown liaison to the Transportation Commission reported that SAC has completed their report on the West 70th Street project(s), adding the City Council will hear the SAC report at their February 3, meeting. Planner Teague reminded Commissioners of their upcoming work session with the Council on February 3rd IV. PUBLIC COMMENT: No public comment V. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Risser moved adjournment at 10:30 PM. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Submitted by P� 13 May 20`h, 2009 City of Edina Planning Commission Attn: Cary Teague 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Interlachen Conditional Use Permit Dear Chair and Commission Members, The Commission should deny the proposed 16,000+ sq ft commercial /industrial facility, expanded maintenance shed and parking lot for the following reasons: A. Application does not Comply with the Zoning Code: 1. Proposed Structure Exceeds the Maximum Allowable Size: The code specifically states that for all R -1 lots in excess of 9,000 sq ft, all accessory buildings and structures may not exceed 1,000 sq ft. There is no exception to this rule for golf courses. Therefore, the proposed application would require a variance to exceed the proposed 1,000 sq ft structure size. As such, the application and public notices are inadequate for the Commission to further consider the proposal. The proposal should be withdrawn and resubmitted identifying that the proposed structure requires a variance. B. Zoning Code does not Define What Uses are Allowable under the "Maintenance Shed" Definition: The proposed use of the "Maintenance Shed" encompasses many uses that are not specifically described under the code. For instance, the code does not specify whether a Staff Lounge and Training Center are considered an allowable use under the "Maintenance Shed" definition. The following uses are not specifically called out as an allowable use under the code: 1 i. Commercial Office Space ii. Staff Lounge iii. Staff Training Center iv. Shower and Locker Room v. Machine Shop vi. Heavy Equipment Storage a. 40 golf carts b. 28 Lawnmowers c. Skid Loaders vii. Fertilizer /Chemical Storage viii. Outdoor Car Wash Therefore, the Commission is compelled to deny or table the application until the code can be updated to address the impacts of each use. C. Application Does Not Meet the Conditions as Required in the CUP: 1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. No Public Benefit: The proposed facility does not provide a public benefit. To the contrary, it has a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhoods and only benefits the applicant. Safety: The proposed facility cannot be adequately served by police and fire protection. State Fire Code requires that all buildings be accessible by suitable fire access lane (regardless of whether or not the building is sprinkled). MSFC (07) Section 503.1.1 requires the installation of fire apparatus access roads for all new buildings and new additions to existing buildings when any portion of the exterior wall is more than 150 feet from the furthest point of fire apparatus access. The requirement for fire department access road applies to all buildings and additions constructed on or after July 10, 2007. a. The proposed facility cannot be accessed by any public road in the event of an emergency. b. The plan does not indicate a location of an official fire lane. c. The existing parking lot and private drive may not be built to city standards capable of handing the weight and turning radiuses of fire trucks as required by state code. d. The facility is located on a dead end path and lacks a fire truck turnaround. e. A study should be done to indicate whether or not the facility can be adequately served by police and fire service. The above reasons constitute a threat to the public welfare. Therefore the Commission is compelled to deny the application. Chemical and Fertilizer Storage: The health and wellness of the residents of the Three Circles neighborhood is at risk due to the increase storage of chemicals and fertilizers in close proximity to a residential neighborhood. A list of all proposed chemical and fertilizers that may be stored at the facility should be made public, including all those that may be flammable or toxic. If any of the proposed are found to be flammable or toxic, the proposed facility should have an emergency action plan in place to adequately allow for emergency vehicle access to this remote area of the site during all times of day and during events. Storm Water Runoff. The existing clubhouse parking lot storm water runoff is not treated before it enters the wetland /pond. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing maintenance shed and expand the parking lot. The applicant should be OA 1A ti,, 3 required to upgrade the storm water facilities to treat the runoff from the clubhouse parking lot to accommodate the increase in impervious surface. Tree Loss: The proposed facility would eliminate 111 significant trees from the site. The application proposes to replace only 35 trees or 32 %. Many tree ordinances require replacement of caliper inches in excess of 100% of existing resource. The City of Edina's code does not adequately address developments that propose substantial tree removal. At a minimum, the applicant should be required to replace what will be removed in caliper inches and the code should be amended to address developments with substantial tree removal. 2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages: Intensity of Use: Despite the claims of the applicant, the proposed facility will increase the intensity of use at the property through increase in overall parking area, office space, training facilities, locker rooms, commercial application, mechanical repairs as well as anew practice green area. This provides for an increase in activities /uses provided by the applicant to its members and staff, and will therefore increase the number of trips entering and leaving the property from Interlachen Boulevard and Blake Road. A traffic study should be completed to determine if the intersections accessing the site are up to current standards. In particular, the Blake Road access is already burdened with poor site lines and visibility. Similarly, the main entrance to the property does not have turn lanes and is a safety hazard for through traffic on Interlachen Boulevard. Given the large number of events held at the course and the proposed increase in the I ntensity of use at the site, roadway access into and out of the site may need to be improved to allow for stacking at the Interlachen Boulevard access point. A traffic study should be required to determine the existing access points are adequately designed to handle the existing and propose increase in trips from the site. 3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance. Decrease in Property Value: The proposed facility will decrease the property value of the properties in the vicinity. Currently, residents of the Three Circles neighborhood enjoy the views of the golf course and a quiet residential setting. Professional realtors that have sold properties in the neighborhood will testify that the proposed commercial /industrial facility will substantially and irreparably reduce the property value of the adjacent and nearby properties. If the City contends that it will not decrease property values, we ask the City provide a written statement from more than one independent appraiser or real estate professional indicating how any why all of the nuisances that will be created by the propose use will not decrease property values. We would also ask the City provide a written statement that the proposed use could be replicated at any location around the golf course without decreasing property values of the adjacent neighborhoods. For example, if the applicant were to purchase and tear down three homes in alternative neighborhood surrounding the course and construct a 16,000+ sq ft industrial facility, it would not negatively impact the surrounding property values. Noise Nuisance: The proposal constitutes a nuisance because it violates the use and enjoyment of land by the adjacent property owners and of the Three Circles neighborhood, given the substantial increase of noise emanating from skid loaders, dumpsters, tractor trailers, other vehicles (including the back -up beepers), and staff. Residents already experience substantial noise emanating from the course. The concentration of the following equipment into a smaller area adjacent will constitute a nuisance: . 1. 40 golf carts 2. 28 Lawnmowers 3. Tractors 4. Skid Loaders (scraping dirt off of concrete and pavement) a. Note: this is very common occurrence 5. Delivery & Garbage Trucks 6. Dumpsters Drop Off and Pick -up and associated loading 7. Outdoor Car Wash (pressure spray equipment) Hours of Operation Nuisance: The applicant is regularly operating heavy equipment before 7am and after 5pm. Concentrating the equipment into one location, closer to a residential neighborhood will not improve the public welfare and will constitute a nuisance in a residential neighborhood. Staff Lounge Nuisance: Residents of the neighborhood have already confronted staff "having a beer" after work. The proposed staff lounge (with an access door facing the neighborhood) will promote after hours use of the facility and constitute a nuisance in a residential neighborhood. This type of use should be limited to the clubhouse area to not disturb the residential character of the surrounding neighborhoods. It will also dramatically increase the number of staff cutting through to nearby neighborhoods. Industrial Nature of the Propose Facility: The proposed commercial /industrial facility cannot be reasonably screened from the public view. The proposed screening is inadequate because the wall facing the neighborhood is 174' long and nearly 30' tall and cannot be screened by landscaping. The facility should be located in an area not as immediately visible from the public view (such as the current location). In addition, the proposed 6' fence on the property line separating the golf course from the residential neighborhood does not fit with the current status of the neighborhood. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. Deter Investment: The proposed facility will deter investments in properties located in the vicinity of the facility. This will reduce the tax capacity of the city and turn what was 4 V a neighborhood on the rise, to one that is diminished and stunted from further improvements. 5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities; Burden on Streets: As previously mentioned, the Blake Road access is burdened with poor site lines and visibility. Similarly, the main entrance to the site does not have turn lanes and is a safety hazard for through traffic on Interlachen Boulevard. 6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and Variance Required: The proposed facility does not meet the conditions of the CUP and is not adequately defined as an allowable use under the R -1 District. It also requires a variance to exceed the 1,000 sq ft maximum size of an accessory use. 7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The propose facility is not consistence with the comprehensive plan: Table 4.3 in the Land Use section states that: "Massing standards and impervious surface coverage limitations would apply to ensure compatibility of infill construction." The City Edina has gone through great lengths to protect the character and architectural qualities of its neighborhoods, including the establishment of a historical preservation district and review board. Recent discussions have centered on the "massing" of homes and the length of "walls" that face a neighboring property. We request that the Commission consider the fad that the proposed facility is 10 times the size of the homes it faces and nearly twice the size of a standard single family lot. The proposed facility includes a nearly 30'tall and 174' feet long wall made out of materials and with an architectural style only found in industrial or commercial applications. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan states that "the City will grow and develop in a sustainable manner that will protect its high quality natural environment, promote energy efficiency and conservation of natural resources, and minimize the impacts of buildings on the environment over the lifetime of each building. Removing 111 trees does not protect the natural environment or conservation of natural areas. This is particularly relevant when the applicant has been operating for nearly 40 years with existing facilities. The environment should not be neglected to allow for an activity in a property that does not have adequate space to support the additional use. And that 'The City will revise its development review and approval process to provide clearer direction and guidance for achieving high - quality development that is compatible with its surroundings." The above statement made by the City reinforces the rationale for denying or tabling the application until the code as been updated to adequately address the proposed use. D. Lot Line Adjustment of Golf Course Properties 1. Gerrymandering of Lot Lines: The proposed application involves the gerrymandering of lot lines to accommodate the proposed commercial industrial facility. The proposed facility would not be allowed to be constructed on the existing residential lots as it would grossly exceed the maximum impervious surface and setback requirements. The code should be amended to require a public notification when a golf course is requesting to remove an existing single family residence and adjust lot lines to make it part of the larger golf course lot. Currently, a golf course has free reign to expand it boundaries without regard to city planning goals and neighborhood implications. This disregards the purpose of zoning, which is to provide for a consistent and harmonious interaction between differentiating land uses. Property owners reply upon the code to protect their investments from intrusions of nuisances. The current code does not provide this protection and should be amend to safeguard property owners. Conclusion: For the aforementioned reasons, we urge this Commission to deny the request of the Interlachen Country Club given that the proposal does not promote or enhance the general public welfare, will diminish the value of the adjacent properties and will detriment and endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the residents of the Three Circles neighborhood. If approved, this proposal will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the residents of Three Circles and will constitute a nuisance. The proposed location for this project is not the most feasible or reasonable given that it will impact more residents and be more intrusive than previous proposals or the existing location of the maintenance facility. Furthermore, this proposal has not had any neighborhood input and has only come to the attention of the Three Circles Neighborhood in the last 15 days. Finally, this proposal is not in line with the City's stated goals, to promote sustainable development and minimize the impacts of buildings on the community. Regards, Nathan & Melisa Franzen on behalf of the Three Circles Neighborhood 6216 Maloney Avenue Edina, MN 55343 n P_ % , -Aw" � k nE L1 4 JUL 0 1 2009 I '_g Interlachen Countrlub Maintenance Facility., 3 F y �'-, ,� Interlachen Country Club - Maintenance Facili View from Belmore ` �'' FRI;1IAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOU-INC. 0i 2 7. INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY EDINA, MN SHEET SCHEDULE ►'JY07 -1 E�ii199R T1 TITLE SWEET A51 SITE PLAN Al MAINTENANCE BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2 ENVIRON STORAGE PLAN 4 ELEVATIONS AS MAINTENANCE BUILDING FLOOR PLAN A4 RESTROOM PLAN 4 ELEVATIONS PNI LIGHTING PLAN SURVEY 1/1 BOUNDRY EXHIBIT V2 TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY 2/2 TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY 1/4 TREE SURVEY 2/4 TREE SURVEY 3/4 TREE SURVEY 4/4 TREE SURVEY 7LVJ1w G1 GRADING PLAN G2 SITE DRAINAGE PLAN G3 SWPPP PLAN G4 DEMOLITION PLAN 05 TREE PRIVATION PLAN C6 MAINTENANCE BUILDING UTILITY PLAN C? RE5TROOM +1 UTILITY PROFILE G8 RESTROOM +2 UTILITY PROFILE DI DETAILS D2 DETAILS D3 DETAILS LI LANDSCAPE PLAN El EA5EMNT PLAN ARGHITECT: TRUI`1AN HOWELL ARCHITECTS a ASSOC. 1 -I815 HUTOHINS DRIVE 1 IINNETONKA, MN 55345 (852) 401 --788g il l N � p s CIVIL ENGR: BARR ENGINEERING GO1`1PANY 4 -700 West 77th Street MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 (ci52) 832 -2840 REVISIONS Z Q F= J E � Z Z � o ILz d U C 7a w w� E TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. 17815 HUIOpS DFdVE YINNEID.NK& WN 55M (i52)Iftl-7B6 FAl(%iH81 -AIE DATE 6/26/09 SCALE DRAWING TITLE SHEET SHEET NO. Ti SHEET OF SITE PLAN A51 r o W-& N REVISIONS VJ O gF Z8 zM cg DATE 6/26/09 SCALE P-00' -0' DRAVANG sm PLAN SHEET ND. AS1 SHEET OF TR-a Wxv Too `+YJIT GLAD WUmWi STEM SdA.ARD --/ RBBH)�gO oV O'L7LL 6L.A•B® L12'. M OVER MEAD DOOR W OPBBt DR-I X11 SOUTH ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING TR-a Wo®TRRI t i, TFLB9 WARM r�.rv.l� -o• ®� am=- CoRNISt 4ar'- � OJ1SmE fiORBL �_L STEEL WALL PANLiSt,-D WALL PAIE_® D' a C OVF3! {FAD DOOR m/ OPBBt DR-I �. TRlB STEEL nns �'•O� RBA ALIT SN �® fTfPJ ®o 61 EAST ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING AI yam• . Ib• Rr[aw STEEL WAu --/ - .. -- TWILL NOL L04 - ALM STOREWZNTJ � - `-dUI7 CLAD PAlB® r VrAL DOCK 1 DOOR cV NU SLAW W DOLL GL X31 WEST ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING.. AI S,r92• a 1'.O• PETAL DOOR 4 PRA7L` rata Trans aeARnra ,i tiewB'c• --Sri OUrSVE Comm® TOP OP cG �.DW — RISS® STEEL . .. WALL PAID ,Ta>ss .l t3FV•s'o' •M CLAD WIh ----AM COLOR SCHEDULE MATERIAL COLOR ® RIBBED STEM- ROOF PANE_ BURNI%W SLATE ® t'erAL PAWIA _ BURNIS E:D SLATE ® RIBISEV STEM WALL PANEL EILMNBHED SLATE ® STEEL TRIM BURNISHED SLATE ® 9T71GrA WHITE (TO MATON EXISTING BLDGSI TR-1 WOOD TRM BROY'@L !TO MAT'OH EXISTING BLOSW DR-I DOORS , WHITE O WMOW AND DOOR FRAMES I MITE -2145- 4 . NORTH ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING AI sgz . I%V 0 (n Z Q F 1.6. 18 LL L Dg d � DATE 6/26/09 SCALE 3/32• -T -0• DRAVANO MAW BUILDM ELEVATIONS 91EET NO. Al .91EET PF r�' u PLAN ®CADDIE SHACK/ CART STORAGE A2 ym• . rc• NDOD Tm TR-1 STUCCO 901-1 BOITOM OP PA B.EV.9'6' RmEw SIB3 WALL PANd® AL1110.AD m/ 9153 6LA98 YP-I s SOUTH ELEVATION � 9J91• • r-0• ® 9mcco — m 1 Now TM -r -__• - _= LLLLI■I■LI■LI■I ='�. .w a .:.. �� Illlilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l�i -` °,' m a1 NORTH ELEVATION s s1 . rc STEEL DU19D2 DORNB2 m-I ®w= BQTTQM OF FASCIA srucco m-0 WORD TRM – AUM CLAD NRIDDYB HHDOP D 9783 DOLOR SCHEDULE MATERIAL COLOR ® RIBBED STEEL ROOF PANH. BURNISbE V SLATE ® FETAL PAWA BL ISWEV SLATE ® RIBBED STEEL WALL PANEL BURNISF® SLATE ma STEEL TR" BURNI%MV SLATS! ® STUCCO WHITE (TO HATCH E%IST1NS BLDGS? TR-1 WOOD TRIM BROWN (TO HATON EMSTINO BLERM ® DOORS WHITE ® KNWA AND DOOR PRAf'ES W11TE lasom WALL P, DODR a/ 91St. 6LA99 ®® S WEST ELEVATION A2 9ld1• • I'-0• HALL 5 EAST ELEVATION A2 s/91• , ro. N= OP FASCIA /L liEVA'�' -mm m m-1 DoNN sT� Bx m-I REMON5 W O gF U Z8 cr o� C Z TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,iNC. 170 N,IDI19 9% IDHIEIDlfA mm om �-7!B Nk(�IR -A0 DATE 6/26/09 SCALE 3/3r-f-M DRAWNG per_ ADDE /[ /yy�CN�'1T STO rLN170 /ELJ SHEET NO, A2 SHEET OF 0 V i MAINTENANCE BUILDING. FLOOR PLAN N A3 siszbiw ZA REVISIONS co gZO � 18 cr �w D4 TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. OBIS mmm am MW70 fpt(6t)Im M DATE 6/26/09 SCALE a7a2• -r-o� DRAWNG MAI - BULDNO PLOOR SHEET NO. „A3 SNE& O COLOR SCHEDULE C_ MAMMAL' COLOR IB E] ' ARC+IITEOTURAL AMN4ALT 9NINGL® . TO MATC 4 MQMNG BUILDINGS 17 B 2 F9-7 WOOD FABCU BROWN (TO MAT'CW DOSTiNG BULLDINGBI ASMULT SWINiSIE9 ® STIOW .. I WWITE (TO MATGW EKISTNG EWLLDM9.L TR-7 WOOD TRIM BROWN (TO MATOW' DOSING BUILDING5H NODD TRm TR-z ® SFLR PAGE CONO BLOCK GRAY YR] ) WINDOW MID DOOR FRAP® BROWS (TO M4TOW DC1STiNG BUILDING Ely c O M@I O 8 4 ® ® R rBeW t i PLAN ® RESTROOM A4 vs• . rc• RP-] 9PAL GOMM A:PIUILT 9NMBL® G Br STUCCO F }7 FGD PA9CL1 F FA9GA fiLYw'O' WOOO TRM TR-1 ®SGYlq TR -7 WOOD 7RM SPLIT PACE O=CE) M%FOQ SLAB TR -7 TRM s ELEVATION ® RESTROOM A4 vs, - 1'-0' TR-7 WOOD TM C_ OOM! RP-z . RPa 9PJ1L DOMN IB iU AS -RALT SO 5 ® 17 B 2 WOOD PASOU E9 ASMULT SWINiSIE9 sEVww• TR -z HOOD TRM WOOD TRM TRa NODD TRm TR-z BT�D® ®WOOD PASOIA B.EVaO• '�® AL114 GI AO NNDONS uV HNL. SAM W'-7 WOOD TRm TRa BPLR PAM OONC a ELEVATION ® RESTROOM A4 TR-] WOOD TRM tw . r-0• kE -DgAL ors5 ASFTNLT BNNBL® _ - . RPa 9PJ1L DOMN WCDD TRM TR-] 17 B 2 91VGrA ASMULT SWINiSIE9 rD II E3 M= PASMA ®WOOD PASOIA '�® P=IA - B.EVw'-0' I�CL® TR-] WOOD TRM BOTTOM OP MQQlA B-EVw'C ® WOOD TRM HR 7R-7 WOOD TRm SPLIT PACE OONO ® ( >n= - Y� SLAB EIEV•O'-0' TR-] WOOD ilal ' B.EV•O'4' TR-7 HOOD TRM - ALIIL CLAD WIND" ®BPLR PAGE CONE m/ ML 61.A9B YF] ELEVATION ® RESTROOM RESTROOM 5 ELEVATION ® RESTROOM A4 Vw a Y-O' A4 VB• ' 1' -0• BEMSION5 N O Q F J 4 C� V ui J I.L li Z GATE 6/26/09 SCALE DRAUNG FLOOR PL.AM SKEET ND. A4 SHEET OF \ g »\» \» » g C »»» g g» g» »»»» g» g »» J °» g g b g. g g g g \ g 9 g 9119 g. g g e g g g g g g g. g g g» g ` \ �» Co g b gig g » b . b . g -\g g 'g » C » » » g g I I \ b g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g� g g g g g \» g 5° g g g C g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g\g -\g : b g g g g g g g g g g »\\\g g g g b g g g g g. g e e g° b g g g g ° POND g b» b g g \g b g g g g g g I I g g g g 91 g gl g g gl o g» ° $.. g .\fie g g. . g a g g g g g g g gl g g gl MAINTENANCE g g g g g g g g g g g l g g g b 91 ( BUILDING g g g$ g g g g g 19 g I g g g t f g g �g g g g g II POND g g g g» I g g g g gI ? » P g b g»» b b C g g g g g g g» I I g g g g 9 1 g gl g g gl g g L r. »??» b» C g g° g g g g g g I I g » g » _ g _ g g g 'd- . \ \/ g g g g g g g g g g » g g g ° » g g g gr g g �g g r- \/ I I g ° g g g g° g g g g g g g g g g g »» g I g g. Ir -g-J g g° l b b g g b g g \g g g g. g o g g» g b g rg g? b b . gl . g g I I g g g g g g g �g g /g g _ a P P P ° ° P p g. g g J - - - --� J g g g g g g g g/ ° g ?/ »»» g g»? g g g g g g g g g g° g g g g g g g g g g b° b g g g g g g g g g b g. g g g g » g g g 9 g g g m» . g g g g g g g g g e g e g g b g g g g g g /g g g/ g e /° ° $ g. g g g g. g ° ... g g 0 g g �g�gJ g/ g g g �CART ` -- —� Wig- Pr g b g 9 g �g g STORAGE EXISTING g g g g e g g g g g g BUILGyNG o g g g g jg�g g g g g F ° . g g g g e e g o c o g g g g g g g b b g b b g g g b g g g ° °. b b.° g e e 1 b e PHOTI'MIGS LIGHTING PLAN PHI law N LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE I-- -- FEATORES a SPECIR�TIDONS :L%FMS a SPECIFICATIONS' Symbol Labal Oy Catalog Number Deaalpaon Lamp File L— LLF f-- - - - - -- :T ORDERING INFORMATION KAD 15DM SR3 AREA LIGHT WITH HIGH ONE 150.WATT PULSE - --- - -- -- -- ----- -- -. . -ta MW B SCWA PERFORMANCE SR3 START WB491.1eg 19000 0.72 OPTICS, CLEAR FLAT GLASS. AH 8' APE "RE ONE 10 -WATT COATED O CC 0 AH 100M BAR CGL LENSED DOWNLGMT [ 7 M ED-17 HALIDE, AM 100M BAR - 7900 0.72 CLEAR GLASS LENS VERTICAL BASE -UP CGLiss loom POSITION. ARCHITECTURAL ONE 1DO -WATT COATED Q DD 5 WST 70M MD SCONCE WITH MEDIUM ED-17 METAL HALIDE, WST 100M M 52DO 0.72 THROW DISTRIBUTION HORIZONTAL POSITION. D.bs WITH CLEAR. FLAT GLASS LENS. COATED LAMP. MEETS THE NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY CRITERIA CONTOUR SERIES ONE (1) 250 WATT ❑ A 1 KACM 70M FP CANOPY LUMINAIRE CLEAR BT28 PULSE KACM_250M_ 520D 0.72 W /FLAT PRISMATIC START METAL HALDE FP.les LENS. MEETS THE LAMP IN HORIZONTAL NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY CRITERIA POSITION STATISTICS DssaWW Symbol Avg Mae Min MmrMin A VNin Area Cal.lated C Grade + 021. 14.1fc 0.0k N/A N/A NOTES 1. Davis A Associates, Inc does not assume responaml0y for the Imerpmtatian of Gee ®IOaeUOn. W C=PDance to locel W guide lighting cedes and ordinances. Z. UpMlrg lay" provided Is not InterMed for oansbucliDn doclumeMa bul only to Dustrete are performance of One product 3. All readMgs/celodatioo are shoem ® grads 4. Fbdum mounting haWds vary pis use elevation vbwe lo vady molaNng helWa S. No obaWceons Included In calculation study. CAL77NVA?ALJGN77/VQ I-- -- FEATORES a SPECIR�TIDONS :L%FMS a SPECIFICATIONS' �" — WST KACM _ . -. ... ...- ®e, 111W.>ma,>ylG1. A rdW�9 -« f-- - - - - -- :T ORDERING INFORMATION �: i - -- �- one - --- - -- -- -- ----- -- -. . -ta CAAnw=wAAmmwAozr I-- - FEATORES a SPECIR�TIDONS _ �" — WST ORDERING INFORMATION rmvvm m1nlr to ow.. sr.suAye . -ta 'iw2VMV1A'UAw /O' FEATURES A SPECIFICATIONS =ma— uei4 _ - KAD ■s:rel - - — taelavuae ORDERING INFORMATION hm�aYMlo�mf v. nMaamgwWl Ml..wnb M6 rmauoemrmmava:rmrn WI•_� - °JI __- - no v a' d° - 1 �Wws® O.re - r- tY°.:4aM.d 4.1A KAICU Surface - Mourned Soh Square HID. Lighting I I reaa.o tblpyrim, Asir ■_ \IEEE �i ■ ■■ ,3 ■■■■■■ ■■■ ►old ■ ■ ■■ :��� ■■ -p- R■■■ MEMO■■ ■E■■■■ ME■ ■E■ M■■■■■ MEMO■■ No IN ■■■■■■ ■■ ■ME■ - -_ -- -: - IA LIf710A//II. L/O /IfDVO' .°.IaeeeammrF.a ...,. KAD 4001111 Amt- mourned Soft Square Cutoff ■i5aij■■■ �II)iWIME %■ ■■ ME M f31'IYM■■ sljJlA■■■ = JUG ■ ■■ fAA fAwA/!AL/vMnwr rrwr. '"k-waftesba-p" - m REVISIONS Z 0 U Z8 Q W LAWQH Z z per. d ft1 TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. TINA wmw DAZE @9ATONW MI NXI (�IAI -7® RS(l'QJIAI -iflA DATE 6/26/09 SCALE T-w-V DRAMA,NeG U �sa� T1M PLAN SHEET NO. PH SHEET OF a I alQ / I' - I �. 2 in f ..... �.. x 1 7 15 11 131! 12 n ' 10_ i -- 74 degrees 15 minutes to the Left from mtl last described line to the pahI at interaction with Ust West On of said Mooi; S�ifieml features Were derived from pr.V -. survey. thence North along the West Ilea of mid Mock to o point therein 350 fat South of the Nrtheest corn. of Bald Black 26. P.M. ed in September, 2003, Mandelndm, to the point of intersection of the dlogand fine oe herenbstre desr ®ad; thence — Un.lng NorNWesledy an on adesdan of cold diagonal the to an ntrsalion With a the parallel to and 20D fad West of the East line of said Block 26; thence North along mid parallel line to an hteramtlan With the North Me of said Blasi 26: thence EM along Wald North Iha to the Northeast comer of ask Block 25; thence North dang the West ins of Black 24, Mentlelsmhn to the Northeast comer thereof: Nunn Eost along the North One d add Mock to the Northeast coma Ihred: thence South done the East and of Blacks 24 and 25. MerMWaslln, to the point of beginning. Par 2: That part of Eaal 10 rode of Northeal O..tr of the Southeast Wart. of Section 29,T.—hip 117. Range 21, described es fdlosa: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the East 10 rods of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Wart. of said Section 29: thence North along the West Ilse clang ask ",t. o distance of 1000 feet thence Southeast h a abalpht line to a paint S feel East d the West me and 696 /eel North at the South lbw of the East 10 rod. (00 the N.Neast Wan- of the Southeast Quarter of amid Section 29; thance Sedhrly n o straight ern. to o pool on the South me of souk tract dbtont 3 fed East of the point of beginning: thence Weal dang the said Lew 3 feet to the point of beginning, all accordng to the United Stales Goverment sway, th.eof. PARCEL C (C.Orimte of Tae No 366165) The West 200 led of the North 150 fast of Black 9, In Mmddnohn, ocerdng to the plot thereof an file or of record in the office at the Register of Deeds n end far said Henneph C—ty. PARCEL D: (Certificate of The No. 366166) Bloat, 9, in Meedalmod., m apt the South 200 fat of the West 115 fast threat es .—ad alma the West and South Ilase thereof. eACepl dm the North 150 fad thereof, — wowing to the plot tharaof on Oe r of record n the oHka of the Register of Deme in and for said Hennepin County. PARCEL E: (Celfic t. of Md. No.466470) The South 200 (set of the Wed 115 last of Block 9, as measured done the Wool and South Ines thereof. n M-Melmahn, mx�deg to the plat thereof an (Be or of record In the office of the Register of Dads In and for said County. PARCEL F: (Certificate of Title No. 711794) That pal of the Southeast Ounrtr of the Nrlhmat Wortr of Section 30, Tmwn.hlp 117, Range 21, descibed ae commencing of a point an the South Ins of the Northeast Quarter of mid Section 30 distant 322 last West fern the Southeast comer of said Northeast Quart-. thence an an assumed bowing at North 0 degree 14 mbwtu 12 smcrds, East. parallel With the East 01e d Wale Northeast Quarter, o dblmce at 230.70 het thence North 74 degrees ON modes 48 secantle West a distance of 22557 fast thence North 0 degrees 13 mhulas 30 —do East. a dwlance of 60 fed to the octud paint of beginning: thence North 0 degree 13 minutes 30 seconds East o distance of 23383 het anon r lea, is the South line of Waterman Avenue, as ehoan an the plot of Mend l..hn; thence Wedeny dang the South Ilne o} Woterman Avenue a d4lence at 121.70 fad to its nterva llm With the Northerly ..tendon .1 the East fine o} •Mbror I&. Vas: a distance at 233.63 feel sure or Ism, to o the bowing North 80 degree 52 minutes 45 seconds Wed from the actual point at beginning; thence South BB ee degr 52 .nut. 45 seconds. East a liston. of 12240 fast to the actual pool of bgnnng. vWaco r awes I I �i I) PARCEL G: (Certificate of Tine No. 711794) All of the North 150 feel except the West 200 fast thereof, E006 9, Menddeeahn PARCEL H That port of Block 26. Nenddsaohn, according to the recorded plat thereat Hennepin County, Mbmemtq I,ng Led at the met 2DO feet thereof end INng north and mat of the following described lin e. Commmchg at the southeast comer d add plot at Mendelmohn; thence Weal drag the south the of sold plot of MmdduL a distance of 322.00 laid thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 30 minutes 49 mcenda West parallel With the mint line of ask plat of Mendelemhn, a distance of 230.70 feet to the point of beginning of the MO to be described; thence North 74 degree 45 minutes 47 —.do Wed a dwtonro of 225.57 fast, thenro Koran 00 degrees 31 mhmles 29 —do Wad to the mth And of Wolrrrlun A— and ask IM there taminmthg. PARCEL I Lot 1. WIlHOIrS AMMON. Hannepn County. Mnrumet . VICMITY MAP LEGEND DEN-1- IRON MONUMENT FOUND • SUBJECT PROPERTY DENOTES 1/2• IRON PIPE PLACED O PARCEL A (Abstract) DUSTING STOW SEWER The South 330 feat of Block 21 Mend losdm, adapt the West 12100 feet of the South 245 feel at mid Block 21 DUSTING SANITARY SEVER Par 1: B; (2 end 3. of oes S 237254) Pm 1: leis I and 3. Audttars SWAvkebn Na. 248, Henneph County. Minnesota, and that purl of Lot 1, Auditor'. SulbNMlan W. E)OSTNG WATERMAN. HYDRANT, AND VALVE 241L Heanepin County, Mkn., described as f llwe, to —wit, ROB Begsdng at the Soutlemet comer of Block 25 MmdelsmNl, thence Westerly along the South lbw at add Block a dolmro of I 322 fast; Nunn North pardd to the Wed line of mid block o distance of 230.7 feel; thence on a We rurnhe d an unlike at 1 7 15 11 131! 12 n ' 10_ i -- 74 degrees 15 minutes to the Left from mtl last described line to the pahI at interaction with Ust West On of said Mooi; S�ifieml features Were derived from pr.V -. survey. thence North along the West Ilea of mid Mock to o point therein 350 fat South of the Nrtheest corn. of Bald Black 26. P.M. ed in September, 2003, Mandelndm, to the point of intersection of the dlogand fine oe herenbstre desr ®ad; thence — Un.lng NorNWesledy an on adesdan of cold diagonal the to an ntrsalion With a the parallel to and 20D fad West of the East line of said Block 26; thence North along mid parallel line to an hteramtlan With the North Me of said Blasi 26: thence EM along Wald North Iha to the Northeast comer of ask Block 25; thence North dang the West ins of Black 24, Mentlelsmhn to the Northeast comer thereof: Nunn Eost along the North One d add Mock to the Northeast coma Ihred: thence South done the East and of Blacks 24 and 25. MerMWaslln, to the point of beginning. Par 2: That part of Eaal 10 rode of Northeal O..tr of the Southeast Wart. of Section 29,T.—hip 117. Range 21, described es fdlosa: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the East 10 rods of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Wart. of said Section 29: thence North along the West Ilse clang ask ",t. o distance of 1000 feet thence Southeast h a abalpht line to a paint S feel East d the West me and 696 /eel North at the South lbw of the East 10 rod. (00 the N.Neast Wan- of the Southeast Quarter of amid Section 29; thance Sedhrly n o straight ern. to o pool on the South me of souk tract dbtont 3 fed East of the point of beginning: thence Weal dang the said Lew 3 feet to the point of beginning, all accordng to the United Stales Goverment sway, th.eof. PARCEL C (C.Orimte of Tae No 366165) The West 200 led of the North 150 fast of Black 9, In Mmddnohn, ocerdng to the plot thereof an file or of record in the office at the Register of Deeds n end far said Henneph C—ty. PARCEL D: (Certificate of The No. 366166) Bloat, 9, in Meedalmod., m apt the South 200 fat of the West 115 fast threat es .—ad alma the West and South Ilase thereof. eACepl dm the North 150 fad thereof, — wowing to the plot tharaof on Oe r of record n the oHka of the Register of Deme in and for said Hennepin County. PARCEL E: (Celfic t. of Md. No.466470) The South 200 (set of the Wed 115 last of Block 9, as measured done the Wool and South Ines thereof. n M-Melmahn, mx�deg to the plat thereof an (Be or of record In the office of the Register of Dads In and for said County. PARCEL F: (Certificate of Title No. 711794) That pal of the Southeast Ounrtr of the Nrlhmat Wortr of Section 30, Tmwn.hlp 117, Range 21, descibed ae commencing of a point an the South Ins of the Northeast Quarter of mid Section 30 distant 322 last West fern the Southeast comer of said Northeast Quart-. thence an an assumed bowing at North 0 degree 14 mbwtu 12 smcrds, East. parallel With the East 01e d Wale Northeast Quarter, o dblmce at 230.70 het thence North 74 degrees ON modes 48 secantle West a distance of 22557 fast thence North 0 degrees 13 mhulas 30 —do East. a dwlance of 60 fed to the octud paint of beginning: thence North 0 degree 13 minutes 30 seconds East o distance of 23383 het anon r lea, is the South line of Waterman Avenue, as ehoan an the plot of Mend l..hn; thence Wedeny dang the South Ilne o} Woterman Avenue a d4lence at 121.70 fad to its nterva llm With the Northerly ..tendon .1 the East fine o} •Mbror I&. Vas: a distance at 233.63 feel sure or Ism, to o the bowing North 80 degree 52 minutes 45 seconds Wed from the actual point at beginning; thence South BB ee degr 52 .nut. 45 seconds. East a liston. of 12240 fast to the actual pool of bgnnng. vWaco r awes I I �i I) PARCEL G: (Certificate of Tine No. 711794) All of the North 150 feel except the West 200 fast thereof, E006 9, Menddeeahn PARCEL H That port of Block 26. Nenddsaohn, according to the recorded plat thereat Hennepin County, Mbmemtq I,ng Led at the met 2DO feet thereof end INng north and mat of the following described lin e. Commmchg at the southeast comer d add plot at Mendelmohn; thence Weal drag the south the of sold plot of MmdduL a distance of 322.00 laid thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 30 minutes 49 mcenda West parallel With the mint line of ask plat of Mendelemhn, a distance of 230.70 feet to the point of beginning of the MO to be described; thence North 74 degree 45 minutes 47 —.do Wed a dwtonro of 225.57 fast, thenro Koran 00 degrees 31 mhmles 29 —do Wad to the mth And of Wolrrrlun A— and ask IM there taminmthg. PARCEL I Lot 1. WIlHOIrS AMMON. Hannepn County. Mnrumet . VICMITY MAP LEGEND DEN-1- IRON MONUMENT FOUND • DENOTES 1/2• IRON PIPE PLACED O DUSTING STOW SEWER DUSTING SANITARY SEVER s — E)OSTNG WATERMAN. HYDRANT, AND VALVE E)OSTNG OVORHEAD(CHE) ELECTRIC U NE '�•— era ) POIET POE AND our WIRE EIOSTNG UNDERGROUND GAS 191E — GAS — W E)OSTNG BURIED TELEPHONE LDff 2f. DEN07CS FENCE DENOTES CHAIN LINK FENCE A DENOTES SETBACK L04E S/ 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET S 11111110 E1 ig • P&INV • s9keye® FRA McCombs Frank Roos ABBOCIaMst, fine. 14BOD21111IAtWWAh'PL Sim 110 F'b+mltll • h$rletom • $M7 pone: 7fLW7D®!0• he 7 asebs� Wtv.unhmn Alent nterlachen Country 'flub CURB, MN 3roject Interlachen Country Club Location Edina, MN I hereby Carllly Not this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my Bvect supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LAND SURVEYOR under the laws of the Slate of M'am solo. Hidiry 1).N so Regietratio .17255Date: 06N8/0 Ikb [arNrb seam etl �vMelnk 1 eaddwr, mbaube tun WPa arwmamWVet W era W i ,pm neat tl Iltl'mb Nm Ras ArotlWe, be; rpmam, YWamn Summary Designee DMM:LCC Appieved:HON Book /Page: Phase. Initial Isom 9 /4/03 Revision History No. Date By Submittal / Revlslae Sheet Title BOUNDARY EXHIBIT Sheet Number Revision 1/1 Project No. INT17705 SEE SHEET 2,.' .y ------ 919 1 /1j \ II V . I /•' ( I I I ' / // EXE W AsEILlom nETIArm 1 i ` v I / Q mass EM1OI m�-mma .r � \ P BYNHl T= 925.86 17 l y1 MALONEY AVENUE— r- 50 100 i/ q I SCALE IN FEET iz- r� I I n / S deu / \ L I 2 \p I E%. BLDG. 111 \\ \ r 1 r ✓ B fi_ — _ 1\\ \\ \�� _ / FFE- 923.37 1 111 I I . I � (, it LAC ✓ �� ' -pfi _ —`� \��_ _ - / / III11 - \r, __ -_ :_Jli ___ � � — I � _ xsae I 111 \ = 5`t� �� �S%L =. \ %. BLDG. _ _ / r / • .�aZ�j� � // �� � � - �-e�— IX. BLDG` ¢aT - - \ \\ 1 Jil 9a) xp ^.1 •' --sze\ T. —92a/ TENNIS COURTS _ - -__ - ,/ /-•;. _ \ _ \,. �m / L L _ \\ r m I •• 1 \ `� xe A // v. BEfA nG GOLF SHOP ICJ 197(�I Y 11 !1 1 x41i. t I ••` 'e FFE =944. \��_��` \\ r [J x 19.7 a6\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ ir, EX GAR. CAB G FE - FFE -94.7 , 29.2 I S L_\ \xn TK- 931.7 \ 4 r nr J E%. G \ \ \ \\ \\ � \` \ \ v V1 EX POOL \ \ \ \\ LFE -945.0 \ \� AREA \ OUSE FFE 8 E 9528 E%. NN \� e✓ / - 1 ,/ ,� 1 \ 1 �� \.:�• 1 I mss= _ = _\�� s \ \\ RE =025}x7\ -0r 61' ;n„N Mm TNN-926.53 — s — SANITARY SEWER O SET MONUMENT —9—STORM SEWER r FLAGPOLE — I —WATER MAIN M ELEC. BOX —_= OVERHEAD WIRES --4 GUY ANCHOR — s — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC (VIII \1 — a — UNDERGROUND GAS I L VII^ 1B6y //////-BUILDING LINE Lr elf E %. RE. 91 - 918.0 � l V -/ ¢ Li L_V v1\ I ' El3�lA "° -9256 jAVEN If I \ \ UDC 1 \ I E, aLD \A\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\ \\ \ I 1 I \\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ �a EX aN C: L. V v,! \ �..1 $I \ \ \ \ \� \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ 976 RE.921.5 a\ EX MN \ \ e �n�sen • FOUND MONUMENT — s — SANITARY SEWER O SET MONUMENT —9—STORM SEWER r FLAGPOLE — I —WATER MAIN M ELEC. BOX —_= OVERHEAD WIRES --4 GUY ANCHOR — s — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UCHT — a — UNDERGROUND GAS i5 BUILDING LIGHT //////-BUILDING LINE Ct UTILITY POLE -----BUILDING CANOPY - SIGN —RIGHT OF ACCESS O. MANHOLE CONCRETE CURB 0 CATCH BASIN CHAIN LINK FENCE V AUTO SPRINKLER 4-9 POST INDICATOR VALVE 0 GATE VALVE O ROOF DRAIN (outlet) b HYDRANT 03 COMMUNICATION BOX IS] SPRINKLER BCX (_ ] BITUMINOUS SURFACE • GUARD POST CONCRETE SURFACE 0 LANDSCAPE SURFACE GENERAL NOTES I)The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities. In the area, elther in service our abandoned. Utility information shown hereon, if any, are a compilation of this map information and those visible utilities that were located during the survey field work. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown hereon, If any, are in the exact location as indicated, although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from Information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. Pursuant to MS 216D contact Gopher State One Coll :at (651- 454 -0002) prior to any excavation. ' 2)this survey was prepared without the benefit of a Title Commitment or abstract and the surveyor has.made no independent search for easements, of record, encumbrances, restrictive Covenants, ownership title evidence or any other facts that an accurate title search may disclose. Therefore, this survey may be revised by showing that which would be cited In o title commitment and then Illustrated on the survey. 3)This Is not a boundary survey. 4)Bmchmarks: 1. Top nut of hydrant located on the South side of Waterman Ave. 2. Top nut of hydrant located on the North side of Maloney Ave. , 3. Top nut of hydrant located on the southeast side of the cal -de -sac of Bdmore Lane. 5)Fleld Work was completed 11 /01 /06. SURVEYOR'S CERTinCATE: I hereby certify that this survey, plan w report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Dated this 17th day of November, 2006. McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. D. Henry D. el n Land Sury Minnesota nee No. 17255 This certification is not wild unless wet signed in blue Ink. t 1 Engineering Planning Surveying _ FRA McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 28th Avenue North • Suite 140 Plymouth, Ninnemto_• 55447 phone 7651476 -6010 • fax 7631476 -8532 Client Interlachen Country Club Edina, Minnesota Protect Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Minnesota, Sheet Title TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY I hereby certify that this plan was preparsd by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Ucensed Land Surveyor under the Iowa of the Slate of Minnesota. Signature Nome Henry D. Nd= Date 11/14/2006 License / 17255 Designed Checked HDN Drawn ERW Approved HDN Date 11/14/2005 Revisions No. Date By Remarks Sheet Revision 2 MFRA FILE NO.: 16189 \ r� J( J � \ J `� \N\ r— —7 — ° — SANITARY SEWER — I I I I r FLAGPOLE � I I r —1 GUY ANCHOR — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC T (^ — ° — UNDERGROUND GAS BUILDING LIGHT //////BUILDING LINE C UTILITY POLE I1 SIGN --RIGHT OF ACCESS 1 CONCRETE CURB 6 CATCH BASIN I`1J1 I v AUTO SPRINKLER -9 POST INDICATOR VALVE 0 GATE VALVE ------------ -6 HYDRANT © COMMUNICATION BOX I / I � T I � / _J 1 Y ; I' I I ,-A I \ lIJ � I I II I II II II � I �� ✓• I I I I I I I I 2 I n II III// E:1 � I 1 EX. BLDG. \ \I I y1r� >�y�l It J \/910 I7 I\ I SEE SHEET 1 I 41 / / / I 1 , tl l V I ,2 \ I 1 xY.111 1 \� I 1 I I I I I I I �I / :J \ 1 I I DG. I 915 4.7 L1 C LEGEND • FOUND MONUMENT — ° — SANITARY SEWER O SET MONUMENT —s—STORM SEWER r FLAGPOLE — - —WATER MAIN M ELEC. BOX --- OVERHEAD WIRES —1 GUY ANCHOR — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LIGHT — ° — UNDERGROUND GAS BUILDING LIGHT //////BUILDING LINE C UTILITY POLE - - - -- BUILDING CANOPY SIGN --RIGHT OF ACCESS O MANHOLE CONCRETE CURB 6 CATCH BASIN CHAIN LINK FENCE v AUTO SPRINKLER -9 POST INDICATOR VALVE 0 GATE VALVE a ROOF DRAIN (outlet) -6 HYDRANT © COMMUNICATION BOX 10 SPRINKLER BOX 0 M, BITUMINOUS SURFACE • GUARD POST CONCRETE SURFACE Q11 SCHEDUI= B ITEM LANDSCAPE SURFACE D So 100 SCALE IN FEET Engineering • Planning • Surveying r M FRA M cCombs s Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 28th Avenue North • Suite 140 P //mouth. Minnesota, • 55447 phone 7631476 -6010 • fax 7631476 -8532 Client Interlachen Country Club Edina, Minnesota Project Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Minnesota Sheet Title TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Signature Nome Henry D. Nilson Dale 11/14/2006 License / 17255 Designed Checked HDN Drawn ERW Approved HDN Data 11/14/2006 Revisions No. Date By Remarks Sheet Revision 2 2 MFRA FILE NO.: 16189 � -• • •��-0 MALONEY AVENUE 'u5 1424 I I I I I I 1465 466 1167 1466 1469 1 475 I I n + 4776 �r-n ✓rLi,g ✓ ✓UF�1v �� Iaz� tae H 4 . V80 �a II .46, 14 461 51 1511 1SM 1 14 119 i I I s1 S +o 1 I 1576 152,1 1512 1519 st 151 +� 1573 1520 1518 151 -':'149 1150 1' 161E �7 '� Ex. BLDG. 1521 1517 ' r- 811 1615 1528 / 1509 1 7 1 • 11 ,SOB 1530 L� 1530 1551 Ifi13 - - - - 1532 t5M 1SS1 533 15M.- /�1` �. TENNIS COURTS = m ISST L v r \ \ / EX BLDG 1538 1579 \'k Ex. GAR. 1510 1. V' \� L• FFE-929 IR 1541 i ^J ✓ ✓�' /1C�1�`t •/ 1542 \ EX. GAR. ` FTE -931.7 1 C EX. HOUSE 1 V` , 1546 1578 547 4 1 I J 1548 1578 737 1549 ,570 1. !F 1612 EX 92 1574 1573 RE-925.67 1572 G­ - ••.• X &" — TMI.926.63 SEE SHEET 2 • 14M I� TC O 1602 �; 1610 1609 1608 1417 ` 1384 +405 ' 8 1387 ,JB5 e ,411 1414 1423 1418 \ 1271 1407 +14,3 +422 1278 \('-� E.B 1 B ,12' (VIII \I \ 3p ,3BB 92 a F ;/,1111 ` 1 h' J I_ I I I BM2 Q LwA� BY win 1121 �+ � -• • •��-0 MALONEY AVENUE 'u5 1424 I I I I I I 1465 466 1167 1466 1469 1 475 I I n + 4776 �r-n ✓rLi,g ✓ ✓UF�1v �� Iaz� tae H 4 . V80 �a II .46, 14 461 51 1511 1SM 1 14 119 i I I s1 S +o 1 I 1576 152,1 1512 1519 st 151 +� 1573 1520 1518 151 -':'149 1150 1' 161E �7 '� Ex. BLDG. 1521 1517 ' r- 811 1615 1528 / 1509 1 7 1 • 11 ,SOB 1530 L� 1530 1551 Ifi13 - - - - 1532 t5M 1SS1 533 15M.- /�1` �. TENNIS COURTS = m ISST L v r \ \ / EX BLDG 1538 1579 \'k Ex. GAR. 1510 1. V' \� L• FFE-929 IR 1541 i ^J ✓ ✓�' /1C�1�`t •/ 1542 \ EX. GAR. ` FTE -931.7 1 C EX. HOUSE 1 V` , 1546 1578 547 4 1 I J 1548 1578 737 1549 ,570 1. !F 1612 EX 92 1574 1573 RE-925.67 1572 G­ - ••.• X &" — TMI.926.63 , , • FOUND MONUMENT Ism O 1602 � IS54 1552 1610 1609 1608 '� 1fiO5 , - 7551 1604 _ 1n ) 11 L7 V \./I \ 1507 1603 ,SSD 4 (VIII \I \ 1439 1431 j1 FI VILB LIGHT — 1: — UNDERGROUND GAS I AIiL Lr1 BUILDING LIGHT BUILDING LINE h EX uH RE -919.0 j 'ter nr�l; 1 1288 1287 ,459 ,414 1440 „437 EX. BLDG. FFE- 923.37 — —1573 Ism— — 1581 A RE- 925.6 AVENUE 1582 1568 — ' 1568 1585 1557 1558 1558 1560 1581 1562 '563 1564 % h EX MH RE -921.5 EX. M, r n ,•1 7585 -1587 +64+ ,543 ry mRa 59 1658 E6 FFE -9 .1 W�11. GQF SHOP ^ POOL LFE-94 AREA a CLUBHOUSE Y FFE -952.8 1589 R�eiw�" lc� EX. BLDG m LEGEND • FOUND MONUMENT ' O f i ­STORM — STORM SEWER FLAGPOLE l■ I 13M u 1420 1427 --i 1439 1431 — 6 — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC E LIGHT — 1: — UNDERGROUND GAS ,459 ,414 1440 „437 EX. BLDG. FFE- 923.37 — —1573 Ism— — 1581 A RE- 925.6 AVENUE 1582 1568 — ' 1568 1585 1557 1558 1558 1560 1581 1562 '563 1564 % h EX MH RE -921.5 EX. M, r n ,•1 7585 -1587 +64+ ,543 ry mRa 59 1658 E6 FFE -9 .1 W�11. GQF SHOP ^ POOL LFE-94 AREA a CLUBHOUSE Y FFE -952.8 1589 R�eiw�" lc� EX. BLDG m 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET Engineering • Planning - Surveying rFRA McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 28th Avenue North Suite 14.? P1)mouth, Minnesota • 5544: phone 7631476 -6010 • fa-. 7631476 -85.72 Client Partners and Sirny Architects 212 West Franklin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota Project Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Minnesota Sheet Title TREE SURVEY I hereby artily that Nis plan was prepared by me or under my diced Supervision and that I am a dung U Bed Land Surveyor under the larn of the tote of Minnesota. SI nature Nerve H D. Nelson Date 11 07 2006 LI"nee 111 17255 Designed Checked HDN Drown ER W Approved HDN Date 11/07/2006 Revisions No. Date By Remarks Sheet Revision 1 4 MFRA FILE NO.: 16189 LEGEND • FOUND MONUMENT — , — SANITARY SEWER O SET MONUMENT ­STORM — STORM SEWER FLAGPOLE — ' —WATER MAIN 21 ELEC. BOX —a^•— OVERHEAD WIRES --i GUY ANCHOR — 6 — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC E LIGHT — 1: — UNDERGROUND GAS BUILDING LIGHT BUILDING LINE h UTILITY POLE ----- -BUILDING CANOPY SIGN —4 —RIGHT OF ACCESS Q MANHOLE CONCRETE CURB 8 CATCH BASIN CHAIN LINK FENCE V AUTO SPRINKLER .- B POST INDICATOR VALVE 0 GATE VALVE o ROOF DRAIN (outlet) -6 HYDRANT ® COMMUNICATION BOX ® SPRINKLER BOX # BITUMINOUS SURFACE • GUARD POST CONCRETE SURFACE SCHEDULE B ITEM LANDSCAPE SURFACE 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET Engineering • Planning - Surveying rFRA McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 28th Avenue North Suite 14.? P1)mouth, Minnesota • 5544: phone 7631476 -6010 • fa-. 7631476 -85.72 Client Partners and Sirny Architects 212 West Franklin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota Project Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Minnesota Sheet Title TREE SURVEY I hereby artily that Nis plan was prepared by me or under my diced Supervision and that I am a dung U Bed Land Surveyor under the larn of the tote of Minnesota. SI nature Nerve H D. Nelson Date 11 07 2006 LI"nee 111 17255 Designed Checked HDN Drown ER W Approved HDN Date 11/07/2006 Revisions No. Date By Remarks Sheet Revision 1 4 MFRA FILE NO.: 16189 \ t` v v F_- -_ —__— !� I Ea \ EX. BLDG. low — 1007 . I I ,C' I , r \\ � V I I r I I I — 1017 SEE SHEET 1 C,246 1247 �,zs, 1270 ,246 W ,249 ry2 >,.✓ 1197 1196 C1196 C 1,97 C1194 1193 L..! 1192 119, C1273 ,234 1272 255 1211 121500 SANITARY SEWER O SET MONUMENT ,257 ����ffffrrrr ,259 r FLAGPOLE I I I � 1273 269 g ,267 —� GUY ANCHOR I UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 1272 - 1274 1617 — o — UNDERGROUND GAS 'y BUILDING LIGHT / / / /// BUILDING LINE C UTILITY POLE I I l v ✓ t 2 OF ACCESS I 11 9 CATCH BASIN CHAIN LINK FENCE 77 AUTO SPRINKLER «6 POST INDICATOR VALVE ® GATE VALVE I ROOF DRAIN (outlet) b HYDRANT ®; COMMUNICATION BOX I � I BITUMINOUS SURFACE • GUARD POST 0 ---T--L-------------- SCHEDULE B ITEM LANDSCAPE SURFACE I \ T �)C - �) Lr I / ,3 \ r 1363 I 1 1 1362 I I I 1361 — I I ` i----- ° - - - I `-j 1 - - I I II II I I I � I I I I I I I I 2 I I I I I I SEE SHEET 1 C,246 1247 �,zs, 1270 ,246 W ,249 ry2 >,.✓ 1197 1196 C1196 C 1,97 C1194 1193 L..! 1192 119, C1273 LEGEND ,234 1272 255 1211 121500 SANITARY SEWER O SET MONUMENT ,257 ����ffffrrrr ,259 r FLAGPOLE —' —WATER ,258 7268 � 1273 269 g ,267 —� GUY ANCHOR �+., .1270 - r •— 1271 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 1272 - 1274 1617 LEGEND O FOUND MONUMENT —s— SANITARY SEWER O SET MONUMENT —g —STORM SEWER r FLAGPOLE —' —WATER MAIN Z ELEC. BOX —o'•'—OVERHEAD WIRES —� GUY ANCHOR — r — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LIGHT — o — UNDERGROUND GAS 'y BUILDING LIGHT / / / /// BUILDING LINE C UTILITY POLE - - - - -- BUILDING CANOPY SIGN —A —RIGHT OF ACCESS O MANHOLE CONCRETE CURB 9 CATCH BASIN CHAIN LINK FENCE 77 AUTO SPRINKLER «6 POST INDICATOR VALVE ® GATE VALVE - U ROOF DRAIN (outlet) b HYDRANT ®; COMMUNICATION BOX M SPRINKLER BOX , !,J BITUMINOUS SURFACE • GUARD POST 0 CONCRETE SURFACE SCHEDULE B ITEM LANDSCAPE SURFACE 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET . Engineering . Planning • Surveying M FRA McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14600 18th Avenue North • Suite 140 Plymout4 Nhnesato • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 •.far 7631476 —a531 Client Partners and Sirny Architects 212 West Franklin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota Project Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Minnesota Shoot Tine TREE SURVEY I hereby certify that this plan wos prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lays of the State of Minnesota. Signature Name Henry D. Nelson Date 11/07/2006 License 1 17255 Designed Checked HDN Drarm ERW Approved HDN Date 11/07/2006 Revisions No. Date By Remarks Sheet Revision 2 4 MFRA FILE NO.: 16189 TAG NUMBER ELEVATION ^,-SPECIES �E 135 916.0 CHERRY 7 136 914.6 BIRCH 6 137 913.9 SPRUCE 6' TALL -138 915.3 BOXELDER 5 139 - 914.6 BIRCH 5 140.914.3 920.6 BIRCH 7 141 918.8 OAK 10 142 921.7 OAK 12 743'' 9229 Ell 9 144 9222 BO XELDER 6 145 924.5 BOXELDER 6 146 914.0 BOXEIDER. ,12 147 913.4 BOXELDER - 7 148 914.2 BO XELDER 6 149 914.2 BO XELDER 7 150 914.5 yALLOW 22 151 914.8 BOXELDER 9 152 913.3 - BOXELDER 6 153 913.0 8010:LDER 7 -154 9,3.2 BOXELDER 12 156 917.5 BOXELDER '6 1000 - 921.5 CATALPA 10 1001 921.1 SYCAMORE 33 1002 919.7 GINKGO 11 1003 978.2 MAPLE 25 1004 918.8 ELM 10 d< 8 1005 918.8 ELM „9 1006 918.0 BASSWOOD 22 1007 917.8 BOXELDER 18 1008 918.4 ELM 16 7009 918.0 ASH 15 .1010 977.9 ELM 36 1011 917.4 ASH 21 1012 917.7 MAPLE 21 1013 921.2 ASH 18 @ 20 1014. 917.4 MAPLE 48 1015 915.8 HICKORY 8 1016 915.8 CHERRY 11 1017 915.9 BOXELDER 12 1018 916.2 CHERRY 16 1019 915.9 BOXELDER 14 1020 915.6 BOXELDER 9 1021 916.2 OAN 19 1022 915.7 OAK 17 1023 916.2 CHERRY 8 1U24 916.7 OAK 9 1025 917.4 ELM 7 1026 917.5 OAK 21 1027 915.9 CHERRY: 8 1028 917.1 B07(EL.DER 7 1029 916.5 BO XELDER - 74 1030 913.3 .ELM ELM. 8 1031 916.1 BOXELDER 7 1032 916.0 BO7(EL.DER 12 1033. 915.9 BOXEIDER 6 - 1034 916.0 • CHERRY 8 1035 916.6 BOXELDER 7 1036 916.6 MAPLE 14 1037 917.4 OAK 15 dr 13 1038 917.4 OAK - 26 1039 876.4 CHERRY 10 1040 916.1 BDXELDER 10 ` 1041 915.9 CHERRY 10 1042 _ 915.8 ELL 14 1043 918.2 BOXELDER 15 TAG NUMBER ELEVATION SPECIES �E 1044 916.0 CHERRY 8 1045 915.9 BOXELDER 14 1048 - 916.3 � BOXELDER . t0 1047 .916.1 CHERRY 7 1048 920.8 SPRUCE 72' TALL 1049 920.6 CHERRY _ 75 1050 921.1 HEMLOCK 10 1051 921.6 HEMLOCK 8 1052 915.6 CHERRY 8 1053 915.9 BO %ELDER .7 1054, 916.0 CHERRY 7,8 dt 9 1055 915.6 CHERRY 10 1056 915.1 ASH 11 1057 915.1 BIRCH 9 1058 915.1 BIRCH 8 1059 915.2 PINE 11' TALL 1060 916.2 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1061 916.0 PINE 12' TALL 10fi2 917.4 - ASH 20 1063 915.4 PINE 12' TALL 1064 914.9 SPRUCE 10' TALL 1065 914.6 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1066 916.4 SPRUCE 16' TALL 1067 914.8 BIRCH S. 7, 7 h 10 : 1068 914.7 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1069 - 914.4 SPRUCE 8' TALL - 1070 914.4 MAPLE 11 1071 914.9 SPRUCE 10' TALL 1072 913.7 HAWTHORN 10 1073 914.0 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1074 "913.9 SPRUCE 6 6. B' TALL 1075 913.2 ELM 14 1076 914.0 BIRCH 6 1077 913.9 BIRCH 6 1076 914.7 BUTTERNUT 16 1079 913.5 PINE 13' TALL 1080 914.7 ASH 6 1081 914.1 PINE 13' TALL 1082 913.9 PINE 14' TALL 1083 914.1 PINE- 16' TALL 1084 915.2 ASH 6 1085 914.9 ASH 8 1086. 915.1 POPLAR 10 "1087 815.7 ASH 22 1088 915.1 CEDAR 6' TALL 1089 915.3 PINE 6.00 1090 915.3 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1091 915.0 SPRUCE 7' TALL 1092 915.0 ASH 10 1093 915.2 ASH 16 1094 913.6 PINE 13' TALL 1095 913.3 .ELM POPLAR 6 1096 913.9 PINE 11' TALL 1097 - 915.0 SPRUCE T TALL 1098 915.4 SPRUCE 10' TALL 1099' 914.3 PINE 13' TALL 1100 915.1 SPRUCE 8' TALL 1101 915.3 BO%ElDER 5, 5, k 6 1102 915.2 ASH 12 1103 - 914.7 ELM 18 1104 915.0 ASH 9 1105 914.0 PINE 1B' TALL -1108 914.6 PINE 14' TALL 1107 915.5 SPRUCE 8' TALL 1108 815.4 SPRUCE 6' TALL TAG NUMBER ELEVATION ..:,SPECIES SjZE ` 1109 914.9 BUTTERNUT'- - 21 1110 915.9 SPRUCE 11' TALL 1111 915.7 PINE 10' TALL 1112 913.8 PINE 18' TALL 1113 913.2 MAPLE 7 1114 913.1 ASH B 1115 913.8 CEDAR t0' TALL . 1116 914.7 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1117 915.0 PINE 10' TALL 1118 915.1 PINE 14' TALL 1119 915.0 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1120 915.0 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1121 915.2 PINE 12' TALL 1122 914.9 PINE 1D' TALL 1123 915.0 BIRCH B 1124 915.3 BIRCH 10 1125 915.8 BUTTERNUT - 18 1126 913.7 BO%E1DER 6 1127 914.4 PINE 6' TALL 1128 914.8 ASH 9 1129 917.2 OAK 22 1130 914.9 ASH 14 1131 914.6 BIRCH - 5. 5, lk 6 11 J2 914.3 BIRCH 7 k B 1133 914.6 MAPLE 6 1134 920.8 POPLAR B 1135 921.1 POPLAR 8 1136 921.7 POPLAR 10 1137 921.6 POPLAR 6 1138 921.3 POPLAR 9 1139 920.4 POPLAR 6 1140 920.4 POPLAR B 1141 920.6 POPLAR 7 1142 919.9 ASH 9 1143 920.5 POPLAR B 1144 920.7 POPLAR 8 1145 921:2 POPLAR 8 1146 918.1 ASH 10 1147 916.1 PINE 9' TALL 1148 915.7 PINE 11' TALL 1149 916.4 ASH B 1150 914.8 PINE 7 TALL 1151 - 914.6 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1152 815.0 PINE 14' TALL 1153 915.9 PINE - 11' TALL 1154 916.3 SPRUCE 8' TALL 1155 914.6 PINE 10' TALL 1156 921.0 POPLAR 7 1157 921.0 POPLAR 7 1156 921.2 POPLAR 6 1159 921.1 POPLAR 10 1160 920.6 POPLAR 10 1161 920.9 POPLAR 10 1162 920.6 ELM 9 1163 920.4 POPLAR 9 1164 920.5 POPLAR 70 1165 920.6 ELM 6 1166 920.6 POPLAR 6 1767 920.7 ]POPLAR ELM 12 1166 920.9 POPLAR B 1169 ' 9227 POPLAR 11 - 1170 9226 POPLAR 9 1171 921.1` ELM 6 1172 - 920.8 BOXELDER 6 1173 921.2 POPLAR 10 TAG NUMBER ELEVATION SPECIES $1ZE 1174 921.4 POPLAR 8 1175 920.8 POPLAR 10 1176 920.0 8070 =LDFR' 7 1777 919.8 POPLAR 7 1178 920.5 POPLAR 15 1179 919.7 POPLAR 9 1180 919.7'� POPLAR 11 1181 919.7 POPLAR 7 1182 919.9 POPLAR 7 11 B3 920.3 POPLAR 10 1184 920.0 BOXELDER 12 1185 9224 OAK 14 1186 920.1 OAK 12 1187 920.2 BO7fE1DQt 6 1188 918.6 BOtOLDER 16 1189 919.8 E1.M 15 1190 920.5 OAK 21 1191 915.3 OAK 24 1192 914.2 OAK 27 . 1193 914.4 OAK 24 1194 914.2 OAK 25 1195 91 },4 OAK 32 1196 9128 ELM 28 1197 914.1 ELM 28 1198 914.9 ASH 12 1199 915.3 OAK B 1200 914.7 BO %ELDER 15 1201 914.5 BOXELDER 12 1202 914.5 BDXELDER 7 1203 914.7 BOXELDER 14 1204 914.1 BOXELDER 6 1205 91 &8 OAK 10 lr 15 1208 918.9 BOXELDER 24 1207 919.0 OAK 24 1208 919.7 OAK 9 1209 919.9 CHERRY 12 1210 920.5 OAK 29 1211 920.1 CHERRY 6 1212 919.0- CHERRY 10 1213 - 920.7 OAK 13 1214 920.9 OAK 19 1215 920.7 ELM 26 1216 9111.4 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1217 919.2 SPRUCE 10' TALL 1218 919.6 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1219 921.5 OAK - 13 1220 921.7 B070 =LDER 7 1221 920.7. BOXELDER B .1222 921.8 ASH 12 .7113 921.5 BO%ELDER B 1224 921:4 ASH 8 1225 921.3 � ELM' 7 1226 r 927.1 HAWTHORN B 1227 921.7 OAK 72 ip 12 1228 921.0 OAK 24 1229 920.9 OAK 29 1230 920.8 OAK 17 1231 919.3 ELM 7 1232 918.3 ELM 7 1233 918.2 OAK 13 7234 - 918.2 OAK 20 1235 917.0 ASH 6 ^1236 917.9 BO %ELDER 14 1237 917.8 ELM 7 1238 � 917.7 BOXELDER 70 TAG NUMBER ELEVATION SPECIES.,. $� 1239 818.1 BOXE3DER 9 1240 918.2 BOXELDER 9 1241 918.0 BOXELDER - - 10 1242. 918.1 BOXELDER "�8 1243 916.1 OAK 20 1244 975.5 OAK 26 1245 915.4 OAK - 20 1246 915.8 HACKAMORE 18 7247 818.6 OAK 27 1248 918.1 OAK 29 1249 916.3 ASH 24 1250 916.3 OAK 28 1251 916.9 OAK 78 1252 923.9 OAK 27 1253 913.6 OAK 24 1254 916.3 OAK -32 1255 918.1 OAK 20 1256 916.1 ELM 28 1257 915.9 ELM 28 1258 916.0 ELM 34 1259 923.3 ASH 16 1260 925.8 CEDAR - 12' TALL 1261 824.8 PINE 17 1262 923.9 BO%ELDFR 15 1263 9229 ELM 9 do 11 1264 9222 BOXELDQt 6, 6, 70 8 10 1265 9225 BOXELDER 9 12fi6 924.5 BOXf]DQ2 6, B 8 8 7267 9226 PINE � - 12' TALL 1268 916.6 ASH 12 1268 916.3 OAK 27 1270 915.7 OAK - 29 7271 915.7 OAK 26 1272 975.9 OAK 19 1273 915.1 MAPLE 14 1274 976.6 OAK 22 7275 917.4 OAK - 26 1276 916.7 OAK 22 ,1277 913.9 BO %ELDER 8 1278 914.7 POPLAR 8 1279 915.0 POPLAR 9 1280 916.3 POPLAR 9 1281 916.3 POPLAR - 11 1282 915.5 ,ELM 6 1283 - 918.Y ELM 13 1284 818.1 ELM 8 1285.' .914.0 BD %EIDER - 12 k 16 1286 913.a BOXELDER 7, 8 k 8 1287 � 911.8 ELM 9 1288 913.1 BOXELDER 9 1289 9123 BOXEIDER 9 1290 914.2 BOXELDER 6, 6, S. R 6 1291 913.0 BOXELDER 9 1292 911.2 BO %ELDER 8 1293 914.2 BOXEIDER 7 8 B 1294 914.5 WILLOW 22 is 24 7295 914.8 BOXELDER 9 8 72 1296 913:3 BOXELDER 6, 7 d< B 1297 913.0 BO %ELDER 7 la 8 1298 913.2 BOXELDER - 12 !t 17 1299 917.5 BOXEIDER 8, 9 k 10 - 1300 913.1 MAPLE 10 1301 911.7 BOXELDER 17 1302 8229 COTTONWOOD B 1303 � 923.6 COTTONWOOD. B Engineering •Planning -• Surveying McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 281h Avenue North • "Suite 140 Pl)rrraufh, Linnaofo •55447 Phone 7631476 -6010 /ox 7631476 -8531 ' Client Partners and Sirny Architects 212 West Franldin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota , Project Interlachen Country Club 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Mlonesote Sheet Title TREE SURVEY I hereby certify That this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Ucrosed LandSurveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ' ' Signature Name Henry D. Nelson Date 11/07/2006 License A 17255 Designed Checked -. HDN Drawn ERW Approved - HDN Dote 71/07/2006 Revisions .. Sheet Revision 3 4 MFRA FILE bO.: 16189 B ELEVATION SPECIES SIZE NU R 923.4 ELM 8 1304 924.1 BOXELDER 12, 12 & 18 1305 924.2 ELM 9 1306 925.1 ELM 9 1307 921.0 COTTONWOOD 8 1308 920.2 COTTONWOOD 6 1309 915.6 ASH 1310 912.8 ELM 1311 914.1 POPLAR 1312 914.9 COTTONWOOD 1313 913.0 ELM 1314 912.8 BOXELDER 1315 9125 ELM 1316 913.5 BOXELDER 1317 913.6 BOXELDER 1318 917.2 POPLAR 1319 916.3 BOXELDER 1320 916.8 COTTONWOOD 1321 918.3 ASH 1322 921.8 POPLAR 1323 924.6 ASH 1324 924.2 BOXELDER 1325 923.9 BOXELDER 1326 923.7 ELM 1327 923.7 POPLAR 1328 923.4 ASH 1329 923.4 BOXELDER 1330 923.8 SPRUCE 1331 924.9 PINE 1332 923.7 SPRUCE 1333 922.4 BOXELDER 1334 9226 ELM 1335 920.4 BOXELDER 1336 921.9 BOXELDER 1337 922.5 POPLAR 1338 921.9 ELM 1339 920.7 BOXELDER 1340 921.7 ELM 1341 920.1 POPLAR 1342 920.3 BOXELDER 1343 919.8 BOXELDER 1344 921.8 BOXELDER 1345 919.7 BOXELDER 1346 919.3 BOXELDER 1347 919.3 BOXELDER 1348 918.5 BOXELDER 1349 918.3 OAK 1350 917.7 OAK 1351 918.4 OAK 1352 927.0 OAK 1353 924.9 SPRUCE 1354 924.0 OAK 1355 925.5 OAK 1356 924.4 OAK 1357 923.4 OAK 1358 923.4 SPRUCE 1359 920.7 ASH 1360 920.6 BOXELDER 1361 921.2 SPRUCE 1352 922.0 SPRUCE 1363 921.7 SPRUCE 1364 922.6 WILL 1365 922.9 ELM 1366 922.0 ELM 1367 923.5 ELM 7 & 10 6 7 6 10 8 6 8 7 7 10 9 9 10 17' TALL 20' TALL 17' TALL 10 14 6 & 6 14 9 10 11 10 11 10 10 10 11 9 8 10 1- 4 L B' TALL 17 22 9' TALL 8 6 & 8 16' TALL 15' TALL 22' TALL 12 & 15 TAG NUMBER ELEVATION SPECIES Sj,E 1368 923.4 ELM 8 1369 923.4 ELM 8 1370 923.3 ELM 9 1371 9221 OAK 24 1372 9222 ASH 9 1373 919.5 BOXELDER 9 1374 917.1 OAK 10. 12 & 14 1375 914.8 OAK 10 & 12 1376 912.1 BOXELDER 6 1377 9127 BOXELDER 6 1378 913.8 BOXELDER 8 1379 913.6 Bo)a:DER 8 1380 913.2 BOXELDER B 1381 913.6 BOXELDER 8 1382 917.2 ELM 8 1383 917.7 BOXELDER 9 1384 917.4 BOXELDER 7 1385 913.7 ELM 10 1386 916.0 WALL 39 1387 914.1 BOXELDER 8 1388 913.6 ASH B 1389 911.0 WILL 12 1390 914.7 OAK 24 1391 915.7 OAK 18 1392 912.6 OAK B 1393 915.8 OAK 7 & 10 1394 916.4 OAK 15 & 18 1395 915.6 OAK 13 1396 911.3 BOXELDER 10 1397 9224 OAK 12 1398 919.1 OAK 14 1399 921.7 OAK 15 1400 9220 OAK 22 1401 921.7 HACKAMORE 7 1402 919.2 BO) DER 7 1403 923.8 BOXELDER 12 1404 912.8 ELM 10 1405 912.9 ELM 12 & 20 1406 9123 WALL 4 & 6 1407 9120 BOXELDER 7 1408 914.3 POPLAR 20 1409 917.1 POPLAR 20 1410 918.4 ELM 10 1411 915.5 ELM 10 1412 917.9 BOXELDER 6 1413 914.7 BOXELDER 7 1414 915.2 BOXELDER 10 1415 9163 HACKAMORE 10 1416 916.1 OAK 14 1417 916.2 BOXELDER 8 1418 916.7 BOXELDER 14 1419 918.9 ELM 6 1420 920.3 BOXELDER 9 1421 919.9 BOXELDER 20 1422 910.8 BOXELDER 9 1423 913.5 BOXELDER 7 1424 919.8 OAK 20 1425 923.2 ELM 26 1426 926.2 SPRUCE 8' TALL 1427 912.7 BOXELDER 8 1428 914.2 BOXELDER 7 1429 911.9 BOXELDER 8 1430 1 912.5 ELM 11 1431 913.5 BOXELDER 6 & 7 JMBER ELEVATION SPECIES IS, E 1432 918.6 BOXELDER 8 1433 916.6 BOXELDER 6 & 7 1434 917.3 ELM 8 1435 918.9 ELM 10 1436 9129 BOXELDER 7 & 7 1437 915.7 ASH 12 1438 915.9 BOXELDER 11 1439 9126 BOXELDER 5 1440 91&1 ELM 6 1441 914.5 ELM 11 1442 913.4 ELM 14 1443 913.7 ELM 7 1444 918.4 ELM 18 1445 917.2 BOXELDER 10 1446 913.2 ELM 18 & 18 1447 9123 ELI 20 1448 913.2 BOXELDER 8 1449 912.6 ELM 11 1450 914.6 ELM 14 1451 920.6 BOXELDER 7 1452 920.8 BOXELDER 6 1453 913.2 BOXELDER 6 1454 916.2 BOXELDER 6 1455 915.2 BOZEIDER 7 1456 923.6 ELM 7' 1457 923.8 ELM 8 1458 923.7 ELM 12�� 1459 923.7 ELM 8 1460 920.8 ELM 7 1461 920.8 D TTONW00 22 1462 920.1 CCOTTONW00 22 1463 919.9 CO TTONWOO 18 1464 920.5 ELM 8 1465 917.4 ELM B 1466 915.8 ELM 7 1467 917.7 ELM 7 & 7 1468 919.6 BOXELDER 7 & 8 1469 914.6 BOXELDER 6 1470 914.2 BOXELDER 8 1471 916.4 POPLAR 9 1472 920.4 BOXELDER B 1473 920.4 BOXELDER 11 1474 916.5 BOXELDER 6 1475 9129 ASH 12 1476 913.5 COTTONWDO 22 1477 913.0 BOXELDER 6 1478 911.7 BOXELDER 9 1479 915.0 OAK 14 1480 915.3 BOXELDER 7 1481 919.8 OAK 14 1482 912.0 BOXELDER 14 1483 926.0 PINE 16' TALL 1484 926.3 PINE 9' TALL 1485 925.7 PINE 8' TALL 1486 927.0 PINE 9' TALL 1487 926.9 PINE 9' TALL 1488 927.5 PINE 10' TALL 1489 927.6 PINE 9' TALL 1490 926.7 PINE 6' TALL 1491 926.8 PINE 7' TALL 1492 927.0 PINE B' TALL 1493 927.3 PINE 10' TALL 1494 927.0 PINE 10' TALL 1495 925.4 ASH 16 NUMB R ELEVATION SPECIES SIZE 1496 927.2 PINE 12' TALL 1497 927.5 PINE 11' TALL 1498 927.6 PINE 9' TALL 1499 927.6 PINE 8' TALL 1500 927.6 PINE 12' TALL 1501 927.7 PINE 10' TALL 1502 927.6 PINE 9' TALL 1503 926.8 PINE 9' TALL 1504 927.1 PINE 10' TALL 1505 927.7 PINE 9' TALL 1506 927.6 BOXELDER 6 1507 929.3 SPRUCE 15' TALL 1508 930.9 SPRUCE 187 TALL 1509 930.5 SPRUCE 14' TALL 1510 927.4 PINE 7' TALL 1511 927.2 PINE 13' TALL 1512 923.9 OAK 12 1513 926.6 ELM 8 1514 927.9 PINE 12' TALL 1515 928.3 ELM 6 1516 928.8 PINE 8' TALL 1517 930.6 SPRUCE 12' TALL 1518 930.0 SPRUCE 10' TALL 1519 930.7 SPRUCE 9' TALL 1520 930.7 SPRUCE 10' TALL 1521 931.3 SPRUCE 12' TALL 1522 931.1 SPRUCE 12' TALL 1523 931.5 SPRUCE 13' TALL 1524 931.5 SPRUCE 12' TALL 1525 1 930.6 SPRUCE 11' TALL 1526 930.1 BOXELDER 8 1527 930.1 BOXELDER 10 1526 927.7 BOXELDER 9 1529 931.6 CEDAR 20' TALL 1530 933.2 CEDAR 18' TALL 1531 934.5 CEDAR 17' TALL 1532 934.5 CEDAR 25' TALL 1533 934.6 CEDAR 25' TALL 1534 935.2 CEDAR 25' TALL 1535 936.0 CEDAR 25' TALL 1536 935.9 CEDAR 25' TALL 1537 936.1 CEDAR 25' TALL 1538 937.7 CEDAR 25' TALL 1539 936.7 CEDAR 25' TALL 1540 934.6 CEDAR 25'- TALL 1541 933.1. CEDAR 25' TALL 1542 9327 CEDAR 25' TALL 1543 932.3 CEDAR 25' TALL 1544 932.1 CEDAR 25' TALL 1545 931.7 CEDAR 25 TALL 1546 931.3 CEDAR 25' TALL 1547 931.2 CEDAR 25' TALL 1548 931.1 CEDAR 25' TALL 1549 930.8 CEDAR 25' TALL 1550 924.5 PINE 10' TALL 1551 925.2 PINE 13' TALL 1552 925.4 PINE 9' TALL 1553 925.9 PINE 12' TALL 1554 926.0 ASH 13 1555 926.6 ASH 15 1556 925.9 PINE 6 & 10' TALL 1557 925.4 MAPLE 5, 6, 5 & 8 1558 925.5 ELM 10, 11, 12 & 13 1559 926.9 SPRUCE 12' TALL TAG NUMBER ELEVATION SPECIES SJj,E 1560 928.0 SPRUCE 8 & 8' TALL 1561 929.6 SPRUCE 21' TALL 1562 928.8 SPRUCE 18' TALL 1563 928.2 SPRUCE 20' TALL 1564 926.0 SPRUCE 12' TALL 1565 927.1 SPRUCE 14' TALL 1566 928.8 OAK 20 & 24 1567 926.0 OAK 25 1558 924.7 OAK 19 & 21 1569 931.4 SPRUCE B' TALL 1570 931.8 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1571 9325 SPRUCE Ir TALL 1572 932.0 SPRUCE 18' TALL 1573 931.5 SPRUCE 16' TALL 1574 931.9 SPRUCE 16' TALL 1575 927.0 OAK 15 & 17 1576 927.9 OAK 16, 17 & 18 1577 925.5 OAK 23 1578 931.0 SPRUCE 18' TALL 1579 931.3 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1580 930.0 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1581 928.6 SPRUCE S' TALL 1582 927.8 SPRUCE 7' TALL 1583 927.6 SPRUCE 6' TALL 1584 928.6 ELM 9, 9 & 10 1585 929.2 ELM 4, 6 ,6 & 7 1586 927.5 ELM 6 & 7 1587 928.2 OAK 12. 13 & 22 1588 929.7 ELM 22.00 1589 923.3 ELM 6.00 1590 925.8 ELM 6, 7 & 8 1591 933.8 ELM 10.0 1592 930.4 ELM 16.0 1593 926.8 ELM 7.0 1594 928.3 HACKAMORE 6.0 1595 926.8 HACKAMORE 8.0 1596 929.6 ELM 10.0 1597 929.9 ELM - 6.0 1598 935.9 ELM 8.0 1599 935.1 ELM 10.0 1600 926.0 ELM 6.0 1601 925.5 HACKAMORE 14.0 1602 926.7 APPLE 10.0 1603 926.2 CEDAR 6' TALL 1604 926.3 CEDAR 7' TALL 1605 926.3 CEDAR 8' TALL 1606 926.3 CEDAR 6' TALL 1607 926.4 CEDAR 7' TALL 1608 926.4 CEDAR 5' TALL 1609 926.4 CEDAR 7' TALL 1610 926.4 CEDAR 8' TALL 1611 927.9 SPRUCE 20' TALL 1612 929.1 CEDAR 12' TALL 1613 924.2 APPLE 10, 10, 10 & 13 1614 920.6 BOXELDER 16, 16 & 18 1615 919.9 BOXELDER 16 1616 918.5 BOXELDER 12 1617 916.4 OAK 20 1618 916.6 OAK 22 1619 916.2 OAK 22 1620 916.5 OAK 24 1621 916.6 OAK - 20 1622 916.2 BASSWOOD 20 IE-� NUMBER ELEVATION SPECIES SJj,E 1623 915.3 BASSWOOD 20 1624 915.7 BASSWOOD 22 1625 915.0 BASSWOOD 15 1626 914.0 BASSWOOD 22 1627 912.4 ELM 19 1628 912.2 ELM 17 1629 912.0 ELM 22 163D 911.9 ELM 21 1631 911.9 ELM 19 1632 912.0 ELM 24 1633 911.7 ELM - 17 911.9 ELM 17 911.7 ELM 16 & 18 E1634 911.7 BASSWOOD 28 911.6 SPRUCE B' TALL 912.2 MAPLE 24 1639 9121 SPRUCE 8' TALL 1640 9126 SPRUCE 10' TALL 1641 917.2 BASSWOOD 10 1642 919.3 SPRUCE 13' TALL 1643 921.2 ELM 18 1644 92B.1 ELM 17 1645 916.9 ELM 10, 12 & 15 1646 918.7 ELM 9 1647 919.8 BOXELDER 7 1648 921.5 ELM 7 1649 920.5 COTTONWOOD 28 1650 917.6 BOXELDER 6 & 6 1651 918.0 COTTONWOOD 22 1652 918.4 COTTONWOOD 14 1653 917.5 COTTONWOOD 17 1654 914.6 BOXELDER 10 1655 914.9 BOXELDER 11 1656 934.9 SPRUCE 7' TALL 1657 927.1 PINE 16' TALL 1658 924.0 SPRUCE 13' TALL 1659 931.2 SPRUCE 13' TALL 1660 913.0 BASSWDOD 21 Engineering • Planning • Surveying r FRA McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 28th Avenue North • Suite 740 Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 7631476 -6010 • Pox 7631,076 -8531 Client Partners and Sirny Architects 212 West Franklin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota Project Interlachen Country Club` 6220 Waterman Avenue Edina, Minnesota Shoot Title TREE SURVEY I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Name Henry D. Nelson Date 11/07/2006 Ucense p 17255 Designed' Checked HDN Drawn ERW Approved HDN Date 11/07/2006 Revisions No. Date By Remarks Sheet Revision 4 4 MFRA FILE NO.: 16189 I-, 3 �Z'7t 50' BIILDING SETBA :K 20' WE 1AND BUFFER 4' CPEP DRAINTILE HWL 9 1 0 EXISTING FES---" R, ELEV.=911.0 VWEEG OVER p WEIR .=917.0 EXISTING p -PARKING LOT MATCH EX'o p BIT. PAVEMENT EXISTING SUBSOIL wm 1mt4 *R T/ CURB AND T b EL 3 GUTTER 8612 EASEMENIT WITH C 15% MAXIMU SUOPE.•, 4" CPEP DRAINTILE -- — c17 SMIN rn 'CIJ N ENAH R4342 CASTING al ° :MERGENCY OVERFLOW RIM :119.6 _tw 18' CPEP INV. 5.0 IL CB CURB INLET - a RIM 921.0 18" CID 'p INV. 918.2 TO RWGI 1 3' CPEP INV' 918.2 TO CURB INLET SUMP ELEV. 914.2 CB CURB INLET RIM 921.0 18' C PEP INV. 918.2 TO RWG1 REI 4FORCED CO 4CRETE WEIR ELEV 919.0 15" C DER INV. 917.0 TO POND SUMP ELEV. 914.2 v. WETLAND EXISTING LIFT — NWL=g 1090 STATION HWL 9 1 0 EXISTING FES---" R, ELEV.=911.0 VWEEG OVER p WEIR .=917.0 EXISTING p -PARKING LOT MATCH EX'o p BIT. PAVEMENT EXISTING SUBSOIL wm 1mt4 *R T/ T b EL MOVE 1 D AWN Y ,-F" PEM U RoikAT E g 91,1 EASEMENIT WITH C 15% MAXIMU SUOPE.•, -- — c17 SMIN rn CPEP ORAItMLk- INTERLACHEN PROPERTY BBOUNDARY­' 20' WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND 20' WETLAND NWL-912.0 BUFFER OVERFLOW TO POND POND 1 k NWL - 914.0 HWL - 916.3 EOF - 918.3 BOTTOM - 910.0 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EL 918.3 12" CPEP FLARED END SECTION INV­912.5 50' BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING FES ELEV.=912.0 J, b. j XF61 T/ T b EL 91,1 -- — c17 SMIN b 57MCTU B FE -RIM 916...3 -REINFORCED ;ONCRETE WEIR 9.15. I__ ST= - FICE_ 9 PROPERTY ST21- 6' OFRtI 4�0_� IVAii .0 1 1 CPEP IN\. .0 IN 0 P 91 ..0 1 AND U7 d 9 11�.' SAFETY �ENCH 5 1OH:1V\ SHORT d 3":IV BELOW I bl�19PE GAME r ST- 0 W-G&T-d I BR -S& Ov, 1 ] I \. % j 51JRS ARWIECT� - "RE!\ CONSTRUCTION) el fURCLMAJ EXISTING �CBI CB NEEN61+ R4342,aAnhc —7 1r CPEP INV.=9f6. 4R M .9- 7 I NVt19'1!K07 c ST__ 3�� PARKIN LOT - f 976 "EX", ST-9' 7ORht _ST_ - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - r EXISTING CART PATH CURA_ INUET' PRD150SED R 19 'o IM 2Cr�,CCESS -7 IV, RCP INV: 91!�.O __R0AI5 12' RCP FLARED END SECTION PLAN: MAINTENANCE mcma GRADING INV. -914.e 8 3 0 40 SCALE IN FEET 3- SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH EXISTING GROUND / /EX -akW FttLL 1' MAX. DEPTH 31{ 1V 2" PLANTING SOIL 2' MINIMUM SOIL LOOSENING GRADE EL VARIES FILTRATION BASIN INV. EL VARIES I I 11, _\ , - EXCAVATE BELOW BOTTOM OF PLANTING - SOIL AND FILL WITH FILTRATION BASIN EL 91 CLEAN WASHED SAND, DO NOT COMPACT. �4' DRAJNTILE, SLOPE DRAINTILE MIN. 0.596. PLACE DRAINTILE ON MIN. 4" SAND. NO SOCK ON DRAINTILE 2_**\SECTION: FILM710N BASIN NOT TO SCALE BUILDING VARIES (5- MIN.) VARIES x - 0 MIN 921.0 (MIN.) 20.0 \-FILTRATION BASIN 921.0 SEE@ r3-"*\ SECTION: RING 2 \1 �_ NOT TO SCALE 1.5- BITUMINOUS WEAR /,// -,- ",—TACK COAT MNDOT 2360 ?/X 2- BITUMINOUS BASE-,A' MNDOT 2360 12' AGGREGATE BASE NOTE: PAVEMENT STRIPING MNDOT 3138 FOR PARKING STALLS (AS SHOWN) A\ DETAI• PARKING LOT \V NOT TO SCALE MATCH FINISH GRADE V MIN. A. MATCH FINISH GRADE 2' MIN. BOTTOM "\ SECTION: GRASSED SW&E '4 NOT TO SCALE REMSONS BA RR VW MH STREEF .N pm 4-6N IL BE BE- z 0 drc ;o av 0 1 bo 0 DATE 6/26/2Wg SCALE 1'-40'-IT DRAWNG GRADING PLAN. SHEET NO. ci T b EL 91,1 -- — c17 rn - _tw a PRIVATE \ PROPIEIM b 57MCTU B FE -RIM 916...3 -REINFORCED ;ONCRETE WEIR 9.15. I__ ST= - FICE_ 9 PROPERTY ST21- 6' OFRtI 4�0_� IVAii .0 1 1 CPEP IN\. .0 IN 0 P 91 ..0 1 AND U7 d 9 11�.' SAFETY �ENCH 5 1OH:1V\ SHORT d 3":IV BELOW I bl�19PE GAME r ST- 0 W-G&T-d I BR -S& Ov, 1 ] I \. % j 51JRS ARWIECT� - "RE!\ CONSTRUCTION) el fURCLMAJ EXISTING �CBI CB NEEN61+ R4342,aAnhc —7 1r CPEP INV.=9f6. 4R M .9- 7 I NVt19'1!K07 c ST__ 3�� PARKIN LOT - f 976 "EX", ST-9' 7ORht _ST_ - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - r EXISTING CART PATH CURA_ INUET' PRD150SED R 19 'o IM 2Cr�,CCESS -7 IV, RCP INV: 91!�.O __R0AI5 12' RCP FLARED END SECTION PLAN: MAINTENANCE mcma GRADING INV. -914.e 8 3 0 40 SCALE IN FEET 3- SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH EXISTING GROUND / /EX -akW FttLL 1' MAX. DEPTH 31{ 1V 2" PLANTING SOIL 2' MINIMUM SOIL LOOSENING GRADE EL VARIES FILTRATION BASIN INV. EL VARIES I I 11, _\ , - EXCAVATE BELOW BOTTOM OF PLANTING - SOIL AND FILL WITH FILTRATION BASIN EL 91 CLEAN WASHED SAND, DO NOT COMPACT. �4' DRAJNTILE, SLOPE DRAINTILE MIN. 0.596. PLACE DRAINTILE ON MIN. 4" SAND. NO SOCK ON DRAINTILE 2_**\SECTION: FILM710N BASIN NOT TO SCALE BUILDING VARIES (5- MIN.) VARIES x - 0 MIN 921.0 (MIN.) 20.0 \-FILTRATION BASIN 921.0 SEE@ r3-"*\ SECTION: RING 2 \1 �_ NOT TO SCALE 1.5- BITUMINOUS WEAR /,// -,- ",—TACK COAT MNDOT 2360 ?/X 2- BITUMINOUS BASE-,A' MNDOT 2360 12' AGGREGATE BASE NOTE: PAVEMENT STRIPING MNDOT 3138 FOR PARKING STALLS (AS SHOWN) A\ DETAI• PARKING LOT \V NOT TO SCALE MATCH FINISH GRADE V MIN. A. MATCH FINISH GRADE 2' MIN. BOTTOM "\ SECTION: GRASSED SW&E '4 NOT TO SCALE REMSONS BA RR VW MH STREEF .N pm 4-6N IL BE BE- z 0 drc ;o av 0 1 bo 0 DATE 6/26/2Wg SCALE 1'-40'-IT DRAWNG GRADING PLAN. SHEET NO. ci 1. INV N CV F X7 7L V-77�,�77"77 7 f > 1� r > > '97 k J17- —IT k, 40' M 40' 41t PLAN: ExisnNQ DRAINAGE AREAS 'G2 " 10 LODI PRA E kSl Aj-- (TO BEIT CHITEL71 — 7 F\PLAN: PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS V11 ORT GAME I J CTICE • GN�ED BY GOLFS IJOURV AOFl L x 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA ARM 1. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 8.1 ACRES 2. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS = 8.36 ACRES 3. TOTAL AREA - 13.18 ACRES REVISIONS BARR HYU aTm Wort 7nH smzr UNNEAPOM Y. a54� F- M - - - - - - - - - - --- Jill t3 0 191 s an b !!§1 r: d IL z 2 S I& ASSOC.,INC. TM5 wmm wK DATE 6/26/2009 ScAlz r-w-v DRAWING DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET NO, C2 ;I f If PRA E kSl Aj-- (TO BEIT CHITEL71 — 7 F\PLAN: PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS V11 ORT GAME I J CTICE • GN�ED BY GOLFS IJOURV AOFl L x 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA ARM 1. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 8.1 ACRES 2. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS = 8.36 ACRES 3. TOTAL AREA - 13.18 ACRES REVISIONS BARR HYU aTm Wort 7nH smzr UNNEAPOM Y. a54� F- M - - - - - - - - - - --- Jill t3 0 191 s an b !!§1 r: d IL z 2 S I& ASSOC.,INC. TM5 wmm wK DATE 6/26/2009 ScAlz r-w-v DRAWING DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET NO, C2 FLOATABLE--,., SILT FENCE III RIPRAP 4- Cf It 1 r7 WETLAND NWL =912.0 20' WETLAND BUFFER 50' BUILDING SETBACK I 11 I <NV � TABLE / ''. `yS SILT FENCE EXISTING ,a STORM _ SEWER �°'• I ? \\� N C 1 ILD {, \\ 4 AS AS AS jr � f N J sy r t;' " ". `�_•�;:.y� . it t sF SF SHORT GAME _ PRACTICE AREA SILT FENCE TO ALSO BE CTO BE DESIGNED BY GOLF COURSE \ \ \\ \ USED AS TREE FENCE ARCHITECT - FUTURE CONSTRUCTION) I ED ® RIP RAP - CLASS III SEE m E NO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ® ° m ON BELMORE LANE r I CONCRETE WASHOUT -- `- - - - -- -- III I -I� ! II I I _ II i I �(UNDEWlB�b( �J% ' "•�' / 7. LAY w lIWN6I .•.:ESA'.• L LAY P �� / / / .,.� E. A A�BL.TH AND ` COMACT PLAN: EXISTING BUILDING DEMOLITION 6 ESIIV/RI IfN16TH 9Wl NOf O® lw W1101i AN ABO01 lIO1D1 1 H e SGH NOTE- All \ 2. 4• TOPSOIL REQUIRED OVER DISTURBED AREA ® DETAIL• TYPICAL STRAW FIBER BLAMW EDEN FENCE ® GRAVEL ENTRANCE ® RIP RAP - CLASS III SEE S — O EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - GT. W STRAV ® FLOATABLE SILT FENCE _ _ _ _ _ — ® STREET SWEEPING AS NECESSARY I� CONCRETE WASHOUT 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL WASH OUT CONCRETE TRUCKS OFFSITE AT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT 2. ROADWAY SWEEPING AND DUST CONTROL INCIDENTAL TO SWPPP IMPLIMENTATHON 3. 4. OF TOPSOIL REQUIRED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS. 1.. 6�' MAXIMUM FOR WATER DEPTHS UP TO Y-0• D® AND 1'-0• MA%MUM FOR DOMIS OVER 3'-0• 2 EIDONATE ANCHOR AND CABLE FOR WATER DEPTHS LESS THAN T-O' OR DISTANCE BETWEEN SHORE ANCHDRS FOR TENSION CABLE OF LESS THAN 700' A ANCHOR TENSION CABLE AT BOTH SIDES WITH STEEL POSTS OF DWRlER AND EENCEH TO PREVENT BENDING AND PULL-OUT 4. WEIGHT HEAVY ENOUGH TO HOLD CURTAIN VERTICAL IN CURRENT AND WAVES TYPICAL FOR SITE 5. MATEIGAM CURTAIN - 22 02 VOOL COATED NYLON FABRIC FLOAT - W MOOEUM DMMETER PLASTIC SEGMENTS CURTAIN WEIGHT - CONTINUOS CALM= STEEL CHAIN 5/16• MINIMUM DAIEIFA, OR SEGMENTS OF 5/16• DIAMETER STEEL CABLE 24• LONG O 1Y BETWEEN PIECES CARRIER FLOAT 5 iB' DWd.TER (YQ!) WATER SWtFACE� � �� (jam S 16• DAIaTER —� �CABLE i gRRAIN FAB16C 1 P : MAINTENANCE FACILITY SWPPP Q 1-24 U ,N)) ' CURTAIN WOE sPACU+D (MAq �� 0 40 80 i� BOTTOM 0 1 I I _ SCALE IN FEET Rm 212. OAN ON 4' MA%. CENTERS S LT FENCE CRCEO A1O LOGnON OF BAC1oD.lID FARRIBORE GOWN CTRADE -1 (SEE oETL noFb ANCHOR TRENCH (SEE DETAa AND NOTES BELOW) 6 M : ^Y�: r � .. ' r/—/.. .�fI 4 \ T FOOE MBL ' I IA- CLEAR yAMW� EG OHT1 E 1 � % 'REiO5f,IO• XD � � m�lis IuoA. r B U-91APm S. 11 GAUGE METAL YA7 r NATIVE SOIL I� A� omwu BY THE 1711? I j�f ,�E ISn�IG /JrC �FLUM J / 'r TWE soa ROW 1' TO r 1 G.� _ �(UNDEWlB�b( �J% ' "•�' / 7. LAY w lIWN6I .•.:ESA'.• L LAY P �� / / / .,.� E. A A�BL.TH AND ` COMACT PLAN: EXISTING BUILDING DEMOLITION 6 ESIIV/RI IfN16TH 9Wl NOf O® lw W1101i AN ABO01 lIO1D1 1 H e SGH NOTE- 1 . SEE SHEET C4 FOR OVERALL LOCATION 2. 4• TOPSOIL REQUIRED OVER DISTURBED AREA ® DETAIL• TYPICAL STRAW FIBER BLAMW 3. SEED & MULCH IMMEDIATELY AT COMPLETION OF DEMOLITION NiD o 6 4. LEAVE IN PLACE EXISTING CONCRETE FLUME 5. DIRECT EXISTING DRAINAGE TO EXISTING CONCRETE FLUME, BY SWALE OR CURBING REVISIONS EL&JRR 110,1114 DIa9TTmo m 47m WEST 77TH 6TR[a MIOEMOLD. WI. ft 1- - 0 Pte 1 LOO 0- I= 11iw�s n32 - 9-� Erm Sav$ Y'T,lt ESE -p ' z °y o5g 3E•cP�� z G $ I A T, _so =o mo TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. I= MEOWS ODIE LDDLTO6TA TW Rim (15TJO -T81 N�!(6� -710 DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE 1 S-40' -V DRAWING SWPPP PLAN. SHEET NO. C3 O (i r 1 I SEE SHEET C -3' FOR RESTORATION, CONCRETE FLUME PRESERVATION 1 do CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION 1 I II I y I EX. BLDG I �I _jMGE OF WETLAND I 1 POND 1 1 20' WETLAND BUFFER I I l\ \ \LIFT STATION I.yaJ it , r Ll � '\ �'� � \ •ice' SAWCUT JOINT R BUILDING HG BUILDING IS 2.0' INTO EASEMENT ® F% BLDR . FFE -62y30 yq I[II, FFE -624.7 \ [EDGE OF EDGE OF � BITUMINOUS POND FORCEMAIN PER CITY OF EDINA AS -BUILT DRAWING / S -_Q s__ HGT -18.7' HGT -17.3' 1 A _ MAINTAIN ACCESS TO EXISTING LIFT STATION PER CITY OF EDINA CITY OF MINA AS —BUILT DRAWING EDGE OF BITUMINOUS 1 PLAN: DEMOLMON O - _ 0 50 100 I I II ISCALE IN FEET BUILDING HGT =20.6' 13L mn0 FPE -021.6 — FENCE FALLS 0.9' EAST O m m EXISTING GAS LIE I 1 --- II FFENCE CORNER LIES 1.3' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE EXISTING FENCE '- �,.�-- _._ —__= CHAIN LINK FENCE FENCE LIES 0.1' EAST OF PROPERTY CORNER NOTES: 1. REMOVAL OF GAS, ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE. CABLE AND ALL OTHER UTILITIES COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. 2. EXISTING SANITARY/WATER SERVICES - ABANDON PER CITY OF EDINA REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING 01. 3. DISCONNECT ALL UTILITY SERVICES AT THE MAIN LINE. TURN OFF WATER SERVICES AT CORPORATION AND DISCONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICES AT MAINLINE BY REPLACING WYE. WATERMAIN LOCATION PER THE CITY OF EDINA EXISTING UTILITIES j a• eo I-EXISTING FENCE / FTE -016.6 1O EXISTING 18' STORM SEWER 0 REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING PER BRAUN INTERTEC STUDY Q EXISTING FENCE ® BUILDING TO BE SAVED � J/ FENCE LIES 2.0' ® REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTING RETAINING WALL f EXISTING WATERMAIN SOUTHEAST OF --- -� PROPERTY CORNER Q EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN & MANHOLE ® REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY © O7 EXISTING HYDRANT PROTECT EXISTING POWER POLE ® REMOVE EXISTING 4' CHAIN LINK FENCE FENCE LIES 1.0' 5 t� _ 18J WEST OF PROPERTY LINE B jFoc mno FENCE LIES 0.1' EAST OF PROPERTY: CORNER EXISTING FENCE '- �,.�-- _._ —__= CHAIN LINK FENCE FENCE LIES 0.1' EAST OF PROPERTY CORNER NOTES: 1. REMOVAL OF GAS, ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE. CABLE AND ALL OTHER UTILITIES COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. 2. EXISTING SANITARY/WATER SERVICES - ABANDON PER CITY OF EDINA REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING 01. 3. DISCONNECT ALL UTILITY SERVICES AT THE MAIN LINE. TURN OFF WATER SERVICES AT CORPORATION AND DISCONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICES AT MAINLINE BY REPLACING WYE. WATERMAIN LOCATION PER THE CITY OF EDINA REMON5 r t�'°°"-Hm6-es-22n P.j�D MMCAPOM " ft e»4em w�tl0' .Cmrmo E. ca9$ tb�c �EEa ; u o F d �Ss �g s wo me DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE 1'- 50' -0' DRANING DEMOLMON p r LM SHEET NO. C4 EXISTING UTILITIES DEMOLITION 1O EXISTING 18' STORM SEWER 0 REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING PER BRAUN INTERTEC STUDY Q EXISTING FORCEMAIN ® BUILDING TO BE SAVED 03 ELECTRICAL LINE TO LIFT STATION (UNKNOWN) ® REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTING RETAINING WALL ® EXISTING WATERMAIN O REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY Q EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN & MANHOLE ® REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY © O7 EXISTING HYDRANT PROTECT EXISTING POWER POLE ® REMOVE EXISTING 4' CHAIN LINK FENCE REMON5 r t�'°°"-Hm6-es-22n P.j�D MMCAPOM " ft e»4em w�tl0' .Cmrmo E. ca9$ tb�c �EEa ; u o F d �Ss �g s wo me DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE 1'- 50' -0' DRANING DEMOLMON p r LM SHEET NO. C4 I p By� L 4% ROTECT IN PLACE DESIREABLE MATURE TREES AS MARKED PER PLAN AND ON SITE DEMO ALL BUCKTHORN AND UNDESIREABLE UNDERSTORY TREES AND SHRUBS IN THIS AREA OM 4w �Aa­ - OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. %In. C, 10 X) le (7) S, DO Ix',. 7� .,j ----------- N� 11 m 41 IN a t C io ­­z Yll t 7 — ;J X N' It A b Ix' Zfl a K" 4 v N1 /A Io 4 C. � x > p 7D Cm m LD t'l'\PLAN: TREE PRESERVATION Oz NOTES: LEGEND: WWI& TREE DEMO TREE - TO BE REmovw 0 40 80 NOTE x SCALE IN FEET TREE - TO BE SAVED, DPROTECT IN PLACE ... TREE FEWE REVISIONS BPJRR FN -tm M*dw- F: (9XD 1IX- W1 .ORrmn C. 5E Rli-slz V'. to !.� gl §E-1 d orc om= TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. =581flMOM mmum NN 5&W DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE l'-49-O' DRAWNG TPILM PSRM PLm SHEET NO. C5 s S 0 m m a a wt a EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SIZE -9' NOTES: 1. PIPE BEDDING INCIDENTAL TO PIPE WORK 2. MINIMUM DEPTH OF WATERMAIN IS 7.5' TO THE TOP OF PIPE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR CITY OF EDINA SEWER AND WATER PERMIT NOTES: 1. TRACER WIRE — 10 GAUGE SOLID REQUIRED FOR SANITARY SERVICE — INCIDENTAL TO PIPE WORK 2. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT /BUILDER OF LOCATION OF UTILITIES UNDER BUILDINGS MATERIALS 8' SANITARY SEWER MAIN — SDR 26 6' SANITARY SERVICE — SCH 40 4' SANITARY SERVICE — SCH 40 6' WATERMAIN — C900 6' WATER SERVICE — DUCTILE IRON PIPE CL 53 2' SERVICE — TYPE K COPPER 1 PLAN: MAINTENANCE FACILITY UTILITIES 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET i y EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SIZE -9' SLOPE -0.4% TYPE —VCP REPLACE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE RIM-919.1 INVERT =907.96 EXISTING WATERMAIN SIZE -8' TYPE— D.I.P. RE%M90NS BARR PN i�ess-sar ONO D0003M 47M WE TIM By= 15435 m Pk i- mo-an -�sn raz (� Km -]e0f ....e°rmn o. a. °s �9or i a °$ °o TC °g g`o g DATE 6/26/20M SCALE r -40' -0• DRANING UT11..ITY PLAN SKEET N0. C6 TREES RESTROOM 01 BUILDING APPROX. FLOOR EL-912.0 TREES FAIRWAY TREES DIRECTIONAL BORE 2' HOPE SDR 11 WATER SERVICE TREES j __� - v v —V 3' SEPARATION _v _ yy,� tAN�yp�� �V I/ so i4N V V \V GRINDER PUMP DIY \ STATION DIRECTIONAL BORE c 2' HOPE SDR 11 SAND 4j \ SANITARY SEWER TRAP \ CONTROL PANEL MOUNT TO BUILDING FAIRWAY SAND TRAP GREEN SAND TRAP BITUMINOUS- 'VEAR CART PATH 920 BITUMINOUSE BASE IGGREGATE BASE SS 5 910 NOTE REPLACE CURB SAME AS EXISTING. 1 DETAIL STREET REPLACEMENT NOT TO SCALE MATERIALS: 1. WATER SERVICE - 2' HOPE SDR 11 2. SANITARY SERVICE - 2' HOPE SDR 11 TRACER WIRE SHALL BE APPROVED FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILLING COLOR - GREEN - SANITARY SERVICE COLOR - BLUE - WATER SERVICE NOM, 1. EASEMENT MUST BE RECORED AND ALL AGREEMENTS IN PLACE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED PER CITY, MUTCD AND MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AT ALL TIMES. ROAD MUST BE OPEN AT NIGHT WITH NO OPEN PIT AREAS. NOTIFY CITY 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CONNECTION. 3. RESTORATION MUST FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS STATED IN THE SWPPP FOR THIS PROJECT. 4. WATER AND SEWER SERVICES MUST BE DIRECTIONAL DRILLED INDMDUALLY. 5. SINGLE PHASE PUMP - MYERS MODEL.# WGL20 SERIES PUMP, MOTOR RATING 2 HP, 3540 RPM, 60 Hz 208 VOLT /OR 230 VOLT. VERIFY TREE F I� �II \ \,-\L 20' MIN. \ \ EXISTING GROUND PROFILE L C MH 4, CONNECT TO EXISTING �� PIT B ' WATERMAIN WITH \ 2' CORP STOP HOUSE JJ � 927 SF STREET IMPACT AREA (S 2' K COPPER c ALL JOINTS) LINE FROM EX WTM TO CURB, STOP 2' CURB STOP AT CONNECT TO EXISTING 8' PROPERTY LINE / �/ \ SANITARY SEWER MAIN (CLAY PIPE) WITH NEW WYE (DISTANCE TO / j \ DOWNSTREAM MH =232' APPROX.) TREES DIRECTIONAL BORE 2' HOPE SDR 11 7�✓ / -J 0`� WATER SERVICE PROPOSED 20' 9•c UTILITY EASEMENT - 6 CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY MUST BE ACQUIRED J�Q\ PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION -I ®o DIRECTIONAL BORE \�\ 2' HOPE SDR 11 SANITARY SEWER � J J / a BORING PIT \-J \c 1 PLAN: RESTROOM #2 UTILITIES O 1 e 30 0 30 60 1 CA i � LE I I S IN FEET . . . . ........ BLOWOUT CONNECTION BLOWOUT CONNECTI CURB STOP PROPERTY LINE MINIMUM COVER 7.5' 680' OF 2' HDPE SDR 11. MINIMI M COVER 4.0'. WATER SERVICE 900 I i . . . . . . . . . . GRINDER PUMP STATION - SEE DETAIL. 710' OF 2' HOPE SDR 11 SANITARY SEWER OF 2' K COPPER R SERVICE _CONNECT TO EXISTING 8' WATERMAIN INVERT ELEV. OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN= 892.78 DATUM ELEV ---__AND WITH NEW WYE 890.00 AND FERNCO ADAPTORS 6 +00 7 +DD 6+00 5+00 4+00 3 +00 2+0D 1 +00 - CLAY TO PLASTIC NOTE DIRECTIONAL BORING MUST BE AS -BUILT BY SURVEYOR DURING /AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND SHOWN IN EXHIBIT. t'2'N PROFILE: RESTROOM #2 UTILITIES HORIZONTAL' 1 550 VERTICAL• 1' =5' REMSIONS RAM nml.a mll.m RM Dmmoamo ma 47M WEST MH SUM mmommA mr< 55135�-40q0-@ t '0 mT2 -�1 U - Or, g z� 5E C aEa,m coo$ b"mb �aooa 'SbgoiS $Cc�� z Liu =`o mo° DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE T-w- ' ;RAVING RESiA00M 91 PLAN SHEET NO. C7 HOUSE CONNECT TO EXISTING 8' SANITARY SEWER MAIN (CLAY PIPE) BORING PIT LOCATION (1,433 SF STREET IMPACT) �gJ� a �� / a /a /a \ a DIRECTIONAL BORE 2' HDPE SDR 11 WATER SERVICE so V 7M• � V � V v MH V INV. =910.69 ' i � 8' CLEANOUi HYDRANT (APPROX. LOCATION) DIRECTIONAL BORE 2' HOPE SDR 11 SANITARY SERVICE VERIFY TREE REMOVAL sMY \ V 61 s,Y TREE FENCE FAIRWAY DIRECTIONAL BORE 2' HOPE SDR 11 WATER SERVICE V \� iy V \ \ AD IRECTIONAL BORE 2' HOPE SDR 11 \ �i SANITARY SERVICE PATH VERIFY TREE REMOVAL TREE FENCE \ GRINDER PUMP STATION CONNECT TO a EXISTING WATERMAIN (APPROX. LOCATION) 93 EL.- �2 BUILDING EL. =932.O 0 INV.- 919.00 O NOTE TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED 0 30 60 ,.5' BITUMINOUSE WEAR 1 PLAN: RESTROOM 2 UTILITIES PER CITY, MUTCD AND MNDOT � = 30" SCALE IN FEET SPECIFICATIONS AT ALL TIMES. ROAD MUST BE OPEN AT NIGHT WITH NO OPEN PIT AREAS. NOTIFY CITY 20 DAYS PRIOR TO CONNECTION. / NOTE: RESTORATION MUST FOLLOW ALL _ REQUIREMENTS AND 2.5' BITUMINOUSE BASE SPECIFICATIONS AS STATED IN THE SWPPP FOR THIS PROJECT., - a ` 960 8' AGGREGATE BASE R CLASS 5 JBLOWOUT � 950 m REPLACE CURB SAME EXISTING GROUND a 1 DETAIL STREET REPLACEMENT AS EXISTING. PROFILE NOT TO SCALE .v. 940 ................. .... ... 2E 930 . . . . . -\.:GRINDER 6 UI STATION 784' OF 2' HOPE SDR 11 SEE DETAL WATER SERVICE ' 920 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONNECT TO EXISTING 616' OF 2' HOPE SDR 11 8' WATERMAIN CONNECT WITH FERNCOVE SANITARY SEWER 910 ADAPTOR -CLAY TO PLASTIC INVERT ELEV. OF' EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN= 910.57 DATUM ELEV 900.00 1 +00 2+D0 3+00 i 4+00 5 +00 6+00 7 +00 8 +00 9+00 MOTE: DIRECTIONAL DRILL MUST BE AS -BUILT BY SURVEYOR DURING /AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND SHOWN IN EXHIBIT. 2 PROFILE: RESTROOM #2 UTILRIES HORIZONTAL• 1--50' VERTICAL 1' =5' REMSONS BARR Ne tom- c_._ -2W Ae7.d a am DIwYFIBO = 47M � MN SOW WOWAMA M fs, E E 2 s$,.. ��osa 9E�A z mDOp. =le1;8 $g 3 LL0 ¢ o c3 =A 0 $gg 8`o mc° HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. 17E5 MGM WE DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE 1' -30' -V DRAVANG RESTROOM f2 PLAN SHEET ND. C8 N a s a rc 90 A xralAxr R.K m a utmAU m pulp Od P@ Op1AlrO rn Tmt -� r pap r aunmKeDn T,p• M. ro. am�vlmlpP lui it eom nmuw xAK I 1 PLAN _ SO- BENDS PIAPm iNETW Awwr w: u owPr1 YNOw aor ,Bnf4+1NOTES, � ruwmil�a�mx ,r�mA�x vrrru�ao OF ALL XmRNId AID mre vuw r,AU ItAK Ia91//Ra Jalf Lda16'Ip6 taE ALtaD.l[tm11111� 1Kl eIAlr0m9 Na�ryrz lr Catak90dr N P AIa ,uTn m tuN mdmlaaaea, ' ALL e1OOp1 rwl er PO4pa10PAGIEA D 1 n,TwAtrt rlAOa rm w¢ wmuxT AIr Io9rm (eumtduP etTE r1A■} o at � ,urr aFtr awTw vcK Im r Iaarm a xtduxr TXAi ANE ozlm®:r r-r raw rotAUam A Imlwr Na■ am�L Ttr waDAfllWx mlwro rgK1 m a ra mllal uo ra asrAaAra aturu m a ,Ie Tir v ra azmDlr, Nm rr Bu xm,Nm nua u PArim 1r■ AT ra rAemr. Pa,tew Aw ros AFm nTmmT AIm ta■n w■ Au mmm Vr cna em ummt tITORAxr ctrl w 1BTAUID rm ■®n AT .r m 1-1. Nrlff.IlK mNra t>m Il�.wn aFA1a eE ■DtAU,m etw ud1 I ®! rwD�Wl m wrrdc m Iue m IoIAw a=a ,A' NtNOaa oARaT rBAUm artml arz K Alm AONM e -�': ENGWEFR NO HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ax=oe' PLATE a PUBLIC STANDARD worucs - _ 00 DEPT& Im btr®t 1 DETAIL HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE NO SCALE JTEIA!il3PIPEA Ug x TE BQT rAS M. PER MT NSTALLID AT m DEd,EEa FRDU TV W PIPE Paan a sae m rAmw ,e.D, alNm m BNM■9 Dm xu v aLLKtm Ardx rA0r0AnaL xapa I]AR, aAUm1 m s- rltAUm w tr a IMOIx ® aullxn a ra mtuATar v ra el,aaa TxABt aww ■rowm tr xEn sac m°Kre � x i>a .r .Tr r AetNa eor ml vn a PUBLIC WORKS DEPTS. IePNAP n vrm ®r mmr srAlmAlm nua smu Ax■ ams Loo au mArmrT tNNE u r ACmImNtQ alr 1!VnPr trm 0.x mzT FLARED END 5 DETAIL FLARED END SECTION NIV NO SCALE STANOARDI PLATE � Tt1[w mtW m Xa aw ■a r - s!1' -i I wuux mwl Nn 1 X -tmn n Arrewm muA� L1®ID r11B1 r .n.stm r s-Vr � � �i>"m emt TDP vR:vF p ra cmT mATaa J� ,�1rt wesB DAa¢T LLK Alm IL II�OIL�m r00aPD QAK 9DE VBB TOP SECTION LIU A aarT 1R 1C .AKIN °ILr o IPrum AoArowlTT aaD� ■Arz xLLK BtR aa$.r T1r¢ Para a t/r mw�sem a ��S_ raiArzlL ®K Am e® yw 1WA mO�O®e _ _ Aw�mnBPOLniN�il.,av a LLl Rla aw,mem T-■alm pNl R alot�u. otalaTOm Imam® a,AFl ee arTABm a Au are rIE1Fa daa 11 9YX P. . AOYIdI A9 Q@ a,e vuK Nd am auu u edAnrt. r� �n� Nmaet■ A e PK wP m rwe mew J w u� m� ra sm Alm BA1 ra arz ro,aATaro rlf. MIDDLE SECTION rya• Au arz mM- :.`ii � vuwMDUEU a v M,o AaYA mIe F�iTw/i/e� r c°®E rmI • NO. 6 ROUND BASE — r:ITV OF—INA i REVISED e ENGINEERING GATE VALVE AND BOX "05 a PUBLIC woRl� DEPrs. wmem 2 DETAIL GATE VALVE AND BOX NO SCALE SEWER SERVICE CLEANOUT NO SCALE 4- bQ wDrz N toFrAa I 1 PLAN _ SO- BENDS PIAPm iNETW Awwr w: u owPr1 YNOw aor + -rE rmrea A PIAX_>Q,�..reDma T + _ 1FE NOIE 1 OF rzWaP ®m taE ■ P ■ D ■ o r r-r ry rr rt r -r rr utmrnsrm cram tam¢la PLAN - 45 BENDS r -r APfNaaWrz t, YY0 raHx OPIII mA MS D ®/ r. NOTEM a mpBldp M L1e1x AI6 eAm OI A MTE11 r -r SECTION A -A Pr�eE 6 t>o tNa rm AM Wd r-tr t' -tr wmsrAla< o , TRI Pm tm. rt. a mPxsa a,a,o swan a u IA00<,TAatw S-r r -r m NAtd Axn1 sa amNOa s mmlaw A,A]AT swan s1 Ae IAe¢ A9 tr r-r Pn1iP tanwOF wo:Daoo reD, Iu can a axra v ■rDI ar aP1oIIa wAV twn w Im r -tr r-r Aa Par o Aran} nDI UIaiSR1RD FARDt rr ar a Fina I11W WT Q 11� N RIAXdIat ,0111 tmm aawErz llm6T DnD101a Pd r -r l Aem_Idl.�da[ trT B[ INPn r-r .•-r poaxrt aP¢ san, aAZ 'P) .•-r CRY OF EDINA REMSM. ENGINEERING CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK m oe s �A�RO a PUBLIC F@- WORKS DEPrs. art Dtrtml 120 BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS ro[ m,R edm .r elw■ rzWaP ®m taE ■ P ■ D ■ o r r-r ry rr rt r -r rr r r -r r -r r-,• rX r -r r-4' tr r-tr t' -tr rK• S-r r -r r-r tr r-r r-r r -tr r-r r -r rr ar r-r Pd r -r rte• r-r .•-r ar .•-r 3 DETAIL• CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK NO SCALE Sul Ps¢ BEwrc DErAe mrvrom rDR RO'. PVG W, Nm VD'. +� Isa0AD1ED eAaFrnl ,x• 0 1/a D 1mL 'mma CIXl�IE BO + C 0Ba C1A55 A •er DFnoTa DUTSOB: . dAYEIER 6 WE IANPACrz9 eAaP■L ' w ,Y iDI r mh D � e B BO /4 BUT NOf I69 1MAx r W aRAMII.K OALTOEL LTIIPACIEO 13Am68x PPE dAIETD,(D) B PPE 01A1alFA(D) B pr a LESS Be + u• 76' m 1E9 4 + Ra' aa• TD x• ,.a x ao aY TD Ise 1z ,a z ae aO' DR OtOA BO + ]e• aY !W IRER Be + Jr M ACC B ) CITY OF EDINA REMSEw eay ;NENGINEERING PIPE BEDDING DETAIL m -oe a PUBLIC srArroARD WORKS PLATE DEPTS. aK¢ a,r [wmm 380 PIPE BEDDING NO SCALE REVI9ON5 Pe: ,gym -ass -xm PtP�a 8VO1 OA'HMMr m 4 7 DETAIL 6 QUAIL 7m RRf 7TTN aIiGET FderAPa4 IDI. a>ta -4® TA =E r ° 6E�� 3Q o,E� v Z 2 rm��o m GATE 8/26/2009 SCALE NO SCALE ORAKNC DETAILS SHEET NO. D1 4 DETAIL STANDARD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE No SCALE 1 NOT USED 48' DIA. RIM EL.EV 921.0 18' CPEP TO CURB INLET INV. 918.2 CONCRETE WEIR ELEV. 919.0 PLACE NORTH OF CATCH BASIN OPENING Vol 12' CPEP TO POND INV. 917.0 t INV. 914.0 44 DETAIL CURB INLET WITH WOR STRUCTURE NO SCALE PLAN Grout bottom of manhole to 1/2 diameter at pipe and slope grout 2' toward invert. Manhole steps shall be placed so that offset vertical portion of cone is facing downstream. No block structures are allowed. Casting and adjustment rings as specified. Manhole steps, Neenah R1981J Dr equal, 16' on center. NI joints in manhole to have '0' ring rubber gaskets. Pipe shall be cut out flush with inside face of wall. Doghouses must be grouted both inside and outside. Minimum slab thickness is 6' for 14' depth. Increase thickness 1' for every 4 of depth greater than 14' and reinforce with 6' x 6' mesh. 3 DETAIL STANDARD STORM SEWER MANHOLE NO SCALE REVISIONS EL&JRR rk i�a�x� -ao1an Viet mew •WOO POJ rrtx ItIRI 0w/IAWm4 Nx seas -�svcv pt, r= a� E- 1; ' " =moo= s =osa I9E�$ d _ c p e i` °-O�o bo r _$000 mo' TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.01C. =01101115M tost'IOAA w sma DATE 6/26/Z= SCALE NO SCALE DRAWING DETAILS SHEET NO. D2 2' FREEBOARD SPLR GRATE (SEE DETAIL) 12' EOF =HWL =916.3 \N• -� WEIR-9115.8 5' 48' DA REINFORCED CONCRETE WEIR WITH 6' ORIFICE E%IS[1NG AT 914.0 WETLAND NWL -9' FES INV. 912.5 I.E. 913.0 I.E. -913.0 " 3' FLAME CUT FES INV. -912.0 ' �'� OPENINGS G OPENINGS FOR 1/2' •.c 1/2' STEEL PLATE NOTE: ALL PIPE LENGTHS INCLUDE HOT DIPPED ANCHOR BOLTS (4) FLARED END SECTION. GALVANRED 4 DETAIL 48' OUTLET CONTROL SPLIT GRATE NO SCALE PLAN Grout bottom of manhole to 1/2 diameter at pipe and slope grout 2' toward invert. Manhole steps shall be placed so that offset vertical portion of cone is facing downstream. No block structures are allowed. Casting and adjustment rings as specified. Manhole steps, Neenah R1981J Dr equal, 16' on center. NI joints in manhole to have '0' ring rubber gaskets. Pipe shall be cut out flush with inside face of wall. Doghouses must be grouted both inside and outside. Minimum slab thickness is 6' for 14' depth. Increase thickness 1' for every 4 of depth greater than 14' and reinforce with 6' x 6' mesh. 3 DETAIL STANDARD STORM SEWER MANHOLE NO SCALE REVISIONS EL&JRR rk i�a�x� -ao1an Viet mew •WOO POJ rrtx ItIRI 0w/IAWm4 Nx seas -�svcv pt, r= a� E- 1; ' " =moo= s =osa I9E�$ d _ c p e i` °-O�o bo r _$000 mo' TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.01C. =01101115M tost'IOAA w sma DATE 6/26/Z= SCALE NO SCALE DRAWING DETAILS SHEET NO. D2 I I I I I 11-1/1-- ES -30968 31DECO2 JUI' ANTI — FLOTATION COLLAR MOUNTING SST. CHARGE FLANGE NLL VALVE, PVC ON, BLOCKED TYPE SIPHON VALVE, PVC 3 /8 -16UNC X 2 LG. ANCHOR STUD (4) REVD, REVISO7S BAM �m noo .ra TTIR muTr WROKAPMA a, U� �E ; $�s.a boa' SE z �co5d � z rs��m E a � la t��so mo DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE NO SCALE DRAWING DETAILS SHEET NO. D3 l ®�� a I RUH. CHAIN LINK FENCING FROM BUILDING CORNER TO POND EDGE Wr 11 II,L l CHAIN LINK FENCING FROM BUILDING CORNER TO POND EDGE 177, PLASTIC EDGING, TYPICAL- - i a .\ • \\ \. \�� \ \\ \\ \\ PLASTIC EDGING, TYPICAL O . VIL IX .r `\ sn . •. Vii- � :.. -�, / ED 7. X. we o .o o M rn 1 PLAN: MAINTENANCE FACILITY LANDSCAPE PLAN o ao so Z W Ci SCALE IN FEET 0 I'll TREE LEGEND: AJ .a Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor I' Triumph Elm Ulmus 'Morton Glossy, American Larch Larix laricina Norway Spruce Picea abies Canadian Hemlock Tsuga canadensis Techny arborvitae ( Thuja occidentalis DExisting tree to be saved. See Sheet C5, Tree Preservation Plan GROUNDCOVERLEGEND: DFine Q LJWet Meadow Mix 5' Gravel Maintenance Strip Mix: 50% August Moon Hosta, 50% Dre's Dagger Crested Lady Fern Heavy Metal Switch Grass Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle Diervilla lonicera Ivory Halo Dogwood o Comus alba 'Bailhalo' Common Lilac Syringa vulgaris Arrrowwood Viburnum Viburnum dentatum TREE LEGEND: AJ .a Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor I' Triumph Elm Ulmus 'Morton Glossy, American Larch Larix laricina Norway Spruce Picea abies Canadian Hemlock Tsuga canadensis Techny arborvitae ( Thuja occidentalis DExisting tree to be saved. See Sheet C5, Tree Preservation Plan GROUNDCOVERLEGEND: DFine Fescue Grass Mix LJWet Meadow Mix 5' Gravel Maintenance Strip Mix: 50% August Moon Hosta, 50% Dre's Dagger Crested Lady Fern Heavy Metal Switch Grass Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle Diervilla lonicera Ivory Halo Dogwood �r Comus alba 'Bailhalo' Common Lilac Syringa vulgaris Arrrowwood Viburnum Viburnum dentatum PLANT LEGEND: REVISIONS B- B DVCWEOUNGM. 10D YES,— SfRCEi NNJYOl4 YN. sass -.ens Da U L) C °u zP zo of i E. oE- 6 orc _ C U _ 2 W �m�Fo z 3 aa� W =b�62o mo TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. 17015 Kn M DIM OWN(AMN ", lazfwl- T®ruleaND�me DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE ,.. -0. DRAWNG PPL MING SHEET NO. L1 —DRNEWAY EASEMENT )LSTORM SEWER PER DOC. 1661913 EASEMENT PER � DOC. 1878798 \ ROPOSED DRNEIWAY EASEMENT \� PROPOSED DRAINAGE do nv r�crurur PROPOSED DRAINAGE k UTILTY EASEMENT / / STORM SEWER STORM SEWER EASEMENT PER EASEMENT PER \ DOC. 1867891 DOC. 1889938 I L_ l I II II I L I I i BELMORE LANE RIGHT —OF —WAY I� 11 II I I I,1 UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER DOC. 1757344 1 PLAN: EASEMENT PLAN 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET REW9DNS ELAMIR ae i- aoo -� -an Qm � 771N SiNEi WWAPUA n 35-4M ft J_5 D- ...- n� -mm U� z� FE $5 ob sb�� z S Urc �bou5 �e- a DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE r- ao,-o. . DRAWING EASEMENT PLAN. SHEEP NO. E1 Jackie Hoogenakker I From Don Hodapp [djhodapp @me.com] Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 3:46 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Interlachen Country Club City of Edina: Case File: 2008.0013.09a We have no objection to the Interlachen Country Club's planned project. Don & Dorothy Hodapp 5016 Oak Bend Lane Edina MN 55436 -1167 952 - 835 -4343 1 To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director REFUR' Agenda Item II .0 Consent ❑ ATIUN Planning Commission Recommended Action. On July 1, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution on pages Al. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council waive second reading and approve the Ordinance as drafted. Inf ormation/B ackground: Attached are the following documents: • Resolution for City Council consideration. • Planning Commission minutes. • The Planning Commission staff report and minutes from previous city council and planning commission consideration of amending regulations in the PSR and PRD Districts. Information Only Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA ® To Council Subject: Zoning Ordinance amendment regarding the . Action ® Motion regulation of efficiency dwelling units in the PSR Resolution Districts. ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Planning Commission Recommended Action. On July 1, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution on pages Al. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council waive second reading and approve the Ordinance as drafted. Inf ormation/B ackground: Attached are the following documents: • Resolution for City Council consideration. • Planning Commission minutes. • The Planning Commission staff report and minutes from previous city council and planning commission consideration of amending regulations in the PSR and PRD Districts. ORDINANCE NO. 2009-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY -CODE CONCERNING REGULATION OF EFFICIENCY DWELLING UNITS IN THE PLAN_ NED, SENIOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.13, Subdivision 7 is hereby amended to read as follows: 850.13. Subd. 7 Special Requirements. C. Efficiency Dwelling Units. Efficiency dwelling units shall be permitted only in subdistricts PRD -3, ai4d PRD 4PSR 3n and PSR Not more.than ten percent of the dwelling units per building shall be efficiency dwelling units, m a PRD.�.3� andG,"PRD-4'disfri tc s Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009 City Clerk PC MEETING JULY 1, 2009 2009.0004.09b Zoning Ordinance Amendment PSR Zoning District. Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission at the`June,116, 2009\City Council meeting, during the review of the 7500 York-senior housing\ project; it was discovered that the Zoning Ordinance doe's not allow Efficiency Dwelling Units within the PSR, Planned Senior Residential Districts. As a result; the City Council set a public hearing date of July 7, 2009, to consider a zoning ordinance amendment to allow efficiency units within these Zoning Districts. The Council asked the Planning Commission to review and ma' ake a recommendation on the Zoning Ordinance amendment: The 7500 York project' was approved by the City Council, subject to approval of a Zoning Ordinance Ameridment that would allow efficiency units within the PSR Districts. i Planner Teague explained,that the'PSR Districts were established in 1977. The intent of the,ordinance was to\provide affordable housing for elderly residents. The Ordinance was drafted at the time that South Haven was proposed; which included 99 1.-bedroom units.that were 550 , square feet in size and one caretaker unit that is,800 squalrejeet in size. The,Qrd nance was later amended to allow two bedroom units up to \�50 square feet in size. This change was made to accommodate a proposal to build:, a 7 -story senior housing project at the 7500 York site. That project was neverbuilt; however, the Ordinance was still amended. Tlie Ordinance has been crafted to fit specific projects that were proposed, similar #o a PUD Ordinance. The difference between this approach and a PUDijs that ihese'same/standards are now required for subsequent proposals, where a PUD Ordinance would allow flexibility to require different standards on different sites. It is not clear as to the intent of the Ordinance in regard to efficiency units: Since the original adoption of the Ordinance, the needs of residents in senior housing developments have changed, and there is a growing need for more memory care units, which are typically smaller, and can be defined as efficiency units. Senior housing now offers a mixture of housing types within a building or site, or a "continuum of care" type facility, which enables residents to move within a building or complex, and not have to move off the site. Often memory care units are included within assisted living projects. Planner Teague pointed out to prohibit an efficiency unit or memory care unit or to regulate the size of these units in the PSR'District is not practical or reasonable. Efficiency units also can keep the cost of housing down for seniors housing, which was part of the original intent of the district. Planner Teague concluded to address this issue, staff 'is recommending approval of the Ordinance, to allow efficiency units within the PSR District. The Ordinance would allow senior housing developments, such as the 7500 York project to proceed with development of efficiency units�in their projects: The regulations for senior housing, including size of dwelling units, will then be further,evaluated as part of the overall Zoning Ordinance re- write. Commission Discussion A discussion ensued with Comm issioners-dcknowledging that during;the 1984 codification it appears a mistake was made in eliminating efficiency units in the PSR zoning district. Allowing efficiency units i nthis district makes sense and is reasonable. Commissioners also noted that th`e Plan ning' Commission, ` is`in the process of updating the Zoning Ordinance and this area could be given another look as the updating process continues., Commission Action Commissioner Browin- moved "to recommend amending the ordinance concerning regulation of efficiency dwelling units in the Planned Senior ResidentiaUDistridL, Commissioner-Grijbiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.�� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 1, 2009 2009.0004.09b Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND At the June 16, 2009 City Council meeting, during the review of the 7500 York senior housing project, it was discovered that the Zoning Ordinance does not allow Efficiency Dwelling Units within the PSR, Planned Senior Residential Districts. As a result, the City Council set a public hearing date of July 7, 2009, to consider a zoning ordinance amendment to allow efficiency units within these Zoning Districts. The Council asked the Planning Commission to review and make a recommendation on the Zoning Ordinance amendment. The 7500 York project was approved by the City Council, subject to approval of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that would allow efficiency units within the PSR Districts. The PSR Districts were established in 1977. (See attached Ordinance on pages A2 —A5, and the Council minutes leading up to the ordinance on pages A6 —A15.) The intent of the ordinance was to provide affordable housing for elderly residents. (See page A2.) The Ordinance was drafted at the time that South Haven was proposed; which included 99 1- bedroom units that were 550 square feet in size and one caretaker unit that is 800 square feet in size. The Ordinance was later amended to allow two bedroom units up to 850 square feet in size. (See page A16 —A17.) This change was made to accommodate a proposal to build a 7 -story senior housing project at the 7500 York site. That project was never built; however, the Ordinance was still amended. (See minutes on pages A18 A21.) In 1984, the entire Zoning Ordinance was amended and codified. It was at that time that the specific language regarding efficiency dwelling units appears. The minutes do not reflect any discussion on that specific language. (See pages A22 —A30.) The Ordinance has been crafted to fit specific projects that were proposed, similar to a PUD Ordinance. The difference between this approach and a PUD, is that these same standards are now required for subsequent proposals, where a PUD Ordinance would allow flexibility to require different standards on different sites. It is not clear as to the intent of the Ordinance in regard to efficiency units. Since the original adoption of the Ordinance, the needs of residents in senior housing developments. have changed, and there is a growing need for more memory care units, which are typically smaller, and can be defined as efficiency units. Senior housing now offers a mixture of housing types within a building or site, or a "continuum of care" type facility, which enables residents to move within a building or complex, and not have to move off the site. Often memory care units are included within assisted living projects. To prohibit an efficiency unit or memory care unit or to regulate the size of these units in the PSR District is not practical or reasonable. Efficiency units also can keep the cost of housing down for seniors housing, which was part of the original intent of the district. CONCLUSION /RECOMMENDATION To address this issue, staff is recommending approval of the attached Ordinance on page Al, to allow efficiency units within the PSR District. The Ordinance would allow senior housing developments, such as the 7500 York project to proceed with development of efficiency units in their projects. The regulations for senior housing, including size of dwelling units, will then be further evaluated as part of the overall Zoning Ordinance re- write. ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A87 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE '(N0. 811) TO ESTABLISH THE SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE DISTRICT, AND ADDING DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by renumbering Section 12 (Defi- nitions) and Section 13 (Administration) to Section 13 and Section 14, respectively. Sec. 2. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by adding a new district to the list of districts therein contained, as follows: "Senior Citizen Residence District (Section 12)." Sec. 3. Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by adding a new Section 12, as follows: "Sec. 12. Senior Citizen Residence District k7 zt-Li 8- / / A 10 F "l. Purpose and Intent. The City Council of the City of Edina finds that there need in the City of Edina for affordable housing for elderly citizens, and that ncreasing population of elderly residents should have available to pleasant, safe, and economical housing. in the Cit} of Edina designed to satisfy the special social and physical needs of this. segment of the population. Therefore, the Senior Citizen Residence District is hereby established to accommodate these needs and to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City. "The standards contained herein are intended to permit residences that have a mass and intensity of activity that is similar to multiple family residences with the ( same numerical identification defined in Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811. "When considering petitions for the transfer of land to the Senior Citizens Residence District, the Edina Planning Commission and Council shall consider the then most recent Housing Assistance Plan approved by the Council, and only those properties that are designated by or shown on such plan as possible locations for senior citizen residences shall be considered for transfer to, or transferred to, the Senior Citizen Residence District. "It is not the purpose and intent of the Senior Citizen Residence District to allow, and there shall not be allowed in the Senior Citizen Residence District, con- valescent, nursing, rest, boarding care, or similar types of residences, homes, or facilities. "2. Senior Citizen Residence District Boundaries. The District hereby established shall be further as District SR -3, District SR -4, and District amendments hereafter made to this paragraph. subdivided into SR -5, and shall Senior Citizen Residence subdistricts designated be located as shown by "3. General Standards. The restrictions and requirements set out in Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 811, in paragraph 3 (Restrictions on Lot Area, Building Bulk and Setbacks), paragraph 4 (Building Design and Construction), paragraph 5 (Distance Between Buildings), paragraph 6 (Accessory Buildings), and paragraph 7 (Parking), relative to the R -3, R -4, and R -5 Districts, shall apply to r4m Ordinance No. 811 -A87 Page 2 the SR -3, SR -4, and SR -5 Districts, respectively, except as specifically modified by this Section 12, and in every case the most restrictive applicable standard set out in said paragraphs shall govern unless specifically modified by the provisions of this Section 12, in which case the provisions of this Section 12 shall govern. "4. Specific Uses Permitted in Districts. The following uses are permitted when 1. a building permit and occupancy certificate have been approved by the Planning Director and issued by the Building Inspector, and no person shall erect, alter, enlarge, move, demolish, use, occupy, or maintain any building, structure, improvement, or premises without first having obtained such permits: "(a) Principal Uses. "District SR -3: "(1) Senior citizen residences containing not less than three nor more than 12 dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals �c one of whom is 62 years of age-or over, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen residence. "Districts SR -4 and SR -5: "(1) Senior citizen residences containing five or more dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of aF or over, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen residence. "(b) Accessory Uses. In addition to those subordinate uses that are clearly and customarily incident to the principal uses, such as driveways, park- ing areas, and garages, the community facilities required by paragraph 6 of this section will be permitted on.the lot occupied by the principal use. "5. Restrictions on Lot Area, Building Bulk, and Setbacks. "(a) Required Lot Area. The minimum lot areas, the maximum allowances, and schedule of allowances set out in paragraph 3 of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811, used in the calculation of required lot area, will be applicable to Districts SR -3, SR -4, and SR -5, respectively, and, in addition, the following allowances are hereby added to the schedule of allowances: "District Basis and Amount of Allowance "SR -3 For each senior citizen dwelling unit; subtract 1500 sq. ft. "SR -4 and SR -5 For each senior citizen dwelling unit; subtract 1000 sq. ft. "(b) Lot Coverage and Floor Area Ratio (FAR). "District Maximum Lot Coverage Maximum FAR "SR -3 and SR -4 35% - - "SR -5 30% 1.2 h3 Ordinance No. 811 -A87 Page 3 "(c) Useable Lot Area. "District. Square Feet Per Senior Citizen - Dwelling Unit "SR -3, SR -4, 200, provided a minimum of 25% of the Useable Lot and SR -5 Area is designed, constructed, and equipped for (for 5 and recreational use of the occupants of the residence 6 story and their guests. buildings) "SR-5 (for 100, provided a minimum of 25% of the - Useable Lot buildings Area is designed, constructed, and equipped for over & recreational use of the occupants of the residence stories) and their guests. ¢ "6. Building Design and construction.. "(a) Floor Area. The minimum net floor area of a senior citizen dwelling unit shall be not less than 550 square feet, and the maximum net floor area shall be not more than 650 square feet. "(b) Community Facilities. Senior citizen residences shall provide recreational, sevvice, and meeting facilities for the use and enjoyment of the residents of the building and their guests, with a minimum net floor area of 1250 square feet or 15 square feet for each senior citizen dwelling unit, whichever is greater. "The facilities shall be indoor space furnished and conditioned for occu- pancy all year. They may consist of meeting rooms, hobby rooms, game rooms, swimming pools, exercise facilities, group kitchen facilities, and similar uses. Outdoor areas, i( laundry rooms, storage areas, mechanical rooms, hallways, foyers, office, commercial, or any circulation space or purely ornamental areas shall not be included to satisfy ff this requirement. it "(c) Laundry Facilities. Adequate laundry facilities and equipment, in- cluding automatic clothes washing and drying machines, laundry tubs, and counter space, �t shall be provided in each senior citizen residence, in a separate room with a minimum floor area of 120 square feet. 7. Parking. Senior citizen residences shall provide parking that conforms to the setback, screening, surfacing, and size requirements for multiple family resi- dences set out in paragraph 7-of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811, except as modified by i1 the following standards: "(a) One completely enclosed and one exposed parking space is required for each non - senior citizen dwelling unit. One enclosed or exposed parking space is re- quired for each senior citizen dwelling unit; provided, however, one -half enclosed or exposed parking space is required per senior citizen dwelling unit in-a senior citizen i� residence that has an entrance located within 500 feet of a public bus stop that has a minimum of'20 scheduled buses per day. s( "(b) In addition, one completely enclosed parking space is'required for each vehicle owned by the management and stored on the site, and one exposed park- ing space is required for each employee who is not a resident of the senior citizen i residence. /4 Ordinance No. 811 -A87 Page 4 r " c A minimum of 75% of the parking required herein for senior citizen residences must be totally enclosed within the principal building or an accessory building. , "(d) All parking spaces shall be used only by the occupants of the senior citizen residence and their guests and visitors. They may, however, also be used ; on a temporary basis by others while making deliveries to an occupant or while doing work on the residence or site." Sec. 4. Section 13 (Definitions) of Ordinance No. •811 is hereby amended to add the following definitions: " 'Senior Citizen Residence' -- A multiple dwelling unit building or group of buildings specifically designed for.use by individuals 62 years of age or over, provided the following criteria are satisfied: "(1) The site is within an SR -3, SR -4, or SR -5 District. 11(2) All dwelling units other than the caretaker's�or resident manager's unit are senior citizen dwelling units and are occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over. Fthar" 'Senior Citizen Dwelling Unit' -- A one- bedroom apartment with a kitchen, n room, living and storage space, the net floor area of which shall be not less 550 square feet nor more than 650 square feet, and specifically designed for pancy by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one hoa: is 62 years of age or over." S.ec. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage.and publication. First Reading: January 17,-1977 Second Reading: February 7, 1977. Published in the Edina- Sun__on February 16, 1 ATTEST: City Clerk As- 1 � MINUTES .OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA. CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 15, .1976 ' Answering rollcall were members Courtney, Richards, Schmidt and Shaw. Council - man Courtney served as Mayor Pro Tem in the absence of Mayor Van.Valkenburg. MINUTES of October 18, 1976, were approved as submitted by motion of Councilwoman Schmidt, seconded by Councilman Shaw. Ayes: Courtney, Richards,. Schmidt, 'Shaw Nays: None Motion carried. SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 6, 1976. Affi -• davits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and. ordered placed on file. Mayor Pro Tem Courtney emphasized that the ordinance under consideration is for general use for making future determinations and not specially written for the proposed development at 51st and -rance Ave. Mr. Luce explained that the pro- posed ordinance was written after study of criteria for each of the other senior citizen buildings in the city and that the Rainbow proposal would have to be modi- fied in several areas to meet these criteria. He explained that the ordinance had not been written for "re -use" purposes, but rather to meet restrictions throughout new areas of the City. Mr. Luce reviewed HUD.criterfa and used the view -graph to Q show requirements. of various other municipalities and a comparison of all other senior citizen housing developments in the City. In response to a question of �[ the Council, Mr. Luce explained that the ordinance calls for community facilities with a minimum net fluor area of 1250 square feet or 15 square feet for each dwelling unit, whichever is greater. He explained that these community facilities would include laundry rooms, meeting rooms, game rooms and other similar uses. He pointed out that Rainbow plans 'would have to be revised'to meet this requirement as well as the requirement for one enclosed or exposed parking space for each senior citizen dwelling unit, except where a building has an entrance located within 500 feet of a bus stop, only one -half parking space is required per dwelling unit. Mr. William Phillips of *The Lanterns requested that the following changes be made to Section 12 of the proposed ordinance: 1) that the third paragraph of Paragraph 1 be deleted; 2) that "Laundry Rooms" be deleted from the second para- graph of Paragraph 5 (B) and that the following be added: Space other than com- munity facilities be provided for laundry equipment; and Community facilities be on a floor not occupied by enclosed parking spaces; 3) that the following be added to Paragraph 6: "All parking spaces enclosed within structure will be on a floor below and separate from any dwelling space ", "Parking spaces for use by residents be so designated and made available to residents at no cost over established rent. Such parking spaces be available on a first come first served basis. Such parking spaces may not be rented. to non - residents. ", and "Two separate automobile entrances (or exits as the case may be) be provided to enclosed parking areas." Mr. Luce questioned whether the City could require the two entrances because,he said, the City cannot be more restrictive than the State Building Code. He added that neither can the City add Building.Code requirements to the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Luce said that he would ask the City Attorney hither it would be legal to require that garages be made available without additional cost to occupants. Council generally agreed with Councilman Shaw that, in view of the fact that the requirements are a sharp reduction from the R-3, R -4 and R -5 requirements, any variance requests should be submitted directly to Council rather than to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Councilman Shaw also requested that the ordinance call for 3/4 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Councilman Richards. suggested that the thrust of the ordinance should be directed to the older developed areas of the City, rather than to the undeveloped areas. Mr. Luce said that people might also want to develop senior citizen housing in undeveloped areas such as the 70th and Cahill area and in Southeast Edina. He expressed concern that buildings in the undeveloped areas might be forced to be more compact than would be desirable. Councilwoman Schmidt expressed her concern that a senior citizen building might later be sold for another use. Following lengthy discussion, Councilman Richards' motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw that the hearing be continued to December 6, 1976, and that the Planning Depart- ment should incorporate the following revisions in a new draft of the ordinance: 1) that any proposed variances to the ordinance be submitted to the Council, rather than to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments; 2) that there shall be no variances granted to Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the proposed ordinance; 3) that 3/4 parking spaces be required for each dwelling unit; 4) that the ordinance should address itself to "re -use" as well as to "new use "; 5) that there should - be alternatives as to density requirements; 6) that there should be more area within the building for social use; 7) that laundry space shall not be included 11/151.76 - -as a "community facility"; •8) that setbacks should be increased to provide more open space around the building; 9) that Mr. Luce check on whether a building for senior citizens should•be covered by the same Building Code requirements as a hospital or nursing home. - Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw .,Nays: None Motion carried. a Mr. Luce assured Mr. Samuel McGowan that he would send copies of the ordinance to all residents on the mailing list and that all questions raised at this hearing would be included as alternatives for Council's consideration. ORDINANCE N0. 811 -A86 GRANTED FIRST BEADING.. Affidavits of Notice were•presented by Clerk, app ved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Luce presented t petition of Fr and Jean Wheeler for zoning change for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Bloc 2, Nine Mile No h 2nd Addition from R -1 Single Residence District to R -2 Mul .ple Residence Distric ,.advising that the property in question is located at 680 - 6505 and 6809 Dovre rive--and that a hearing for lot division of the propert will also- be.considered ate, on in this meeting. Mr. Luce stated that the 1J tern Edina Land IIse Plaa deutifies this area for low density attached dweni units and advised that the arming Commission has recommended approval. He ecalled that the Planning Co sion had assured Parkwood Knolls residents wh had attended the Plaaa�?+g C ssion hearing that they would never make y recommenda- tion for similar rezonin of lots-on Parkwood Lane. Mr. Luce said hat no vari- ances would be required. ass an attempt should be made to save me trees which are on the property. Mrs. elen-McClelland recalled that a peti ion in op�osltion had been presented to the P g Commission opposing any furt er R -2 development on the North side of Dovre D 've.• Mr. Wheeler offered to ans any questions df the Council. No objections b heard, Councilman Richards ffered Ordinance No. 811 -A86 for First Reading recommended by the Plannin Commission for the following reasons: 1) The prop al is in conformance with the Western Edina Plan. 2) The proposed lots meet zoning estrictions; and 3) Th property is a transi- tional property between the singl family area to the E t and the industrial uses to the West: ORD CE NO. 811 -A86 AN ORDINANCE AMEND G THE ZONING 0 INANCE (N0: 811) BY ADDING TO THE TIPLE RES ENCE DISTRICT__ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA' Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section\ amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Multiple Residen of the-following properties: Lc-ts 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Nine Mile District R-2:" Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in and publication. ns: No. 811 of the City is is enlarged by the addition 2nd Addition, which is in Sub- force and effect upon its passage LOTS 1 2 AND 3 BLOCK 2 NINE MILE RTH 2ND AD TTION DIVISION APPROVED. Affi- davits of Notice were presented by lerk, approv as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Luce presented the titian of Mr. d Mrs. Frank Wheeler for divi- sion of Lot 2 and combining eac a1f with the othe two lots for two double bungalow lots in conformance h Ordinance No. 811- 86. No objections being heard, Councilman Richards of Bred the following reso ution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following des ibed tracts of land are no separate parcels: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Blo 2, Nine Mile North 2nd Subdi ision, City of Edina, Hennepin County; WHEREAS, the owners of lie above tracts of land desire to ombine said tracts into the following de cribed new and separate parcels (her n called "Parcels ") Lot 3 and the t 60 feet of Lot 2, Nine Mile North 2 Subdivision, City of Edina Hennepin County; and Lot 1 and Lo 2, Except the East 60 feet thereof, Nine MI a North 2nd Subdivisi.o , City of Edina, Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, it been determined that compliance with the Subdivi ion and Zoning Regulations the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hands ip and said Parcels as eparate tracts of laud do not interfere with the purpo as of the 5ubdivisi and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edin Ordinance Nos. 80 and 811; NOW, REFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that a conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts o land is her y approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 8 and Or ' ante No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyanc ereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpo a or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision t at ao further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City.of Edina or with the prior approval of this k 1 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE-,. EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 6, 1976 Answering rollcall were members Courtney,-Richards, Schmidt, Shaw and Mayor Van Valkenburg. MINUTES of November 15, 1976, were approved as submitted by motion of Council- woman Schmidt, seconded by Councilman Richards and carried. POLITY PETERSON, MISS TEENAGE MINNESOTA RECOGNIZED. Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS WHEREAS, Polly Peterson is a resident of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, Polly Peterson attends Edina East High School and presently has been recognized by her classmates by being elected President of the Student Council; and WHEREAS, Polly Peterson, as Miss Teenage Minnesota, participated in the Miss Teen- age America Pageant which was held at Oral Roberts University, Tulsa, Oklahoma, ou November 27, 1976; and WHEREAS, because of her charm and talent in playing the harp, Polly Peterson was chosen second runner -up in the Miss Teenage America Pageant, bringing great honor to herself and to the City.of'Ediva; NOW, THEREFORE', BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby express its most sincere congratulations to POLLY PETERSON for these honors which have come to her and do wish her every success as she continues her education through high school and in her future years. Q Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw and unani- mously carried. SWINE FLU IM ONIZATION PROGRAM APPRECIATION EXPRESSED. Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, in implementing the Swine Flu .Immunization Program, Hennepin County has requested the cooperation of the various Hennepin County municipalities; and 4HER1?bG,.in response to this request, immunization clinics were set up 'at the -Edina City Hall and various other locations in the City which were staffed by professional' people and numerous volunteers; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does express its most. sincere appreciation to the many volunteers who gave so u1llingly of their time as a eervice to. their fellow man. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded. by Councilman Shaw and unani- mously carried. SENIOR CITIZEk HOUSING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO JANUARY 20, 1977, Mr. Luce recalled that the Senior Citizen Housing Ordinance had been continued from the meeting of November 15, 1976; so that the proposed ordinance could be re- drafted to reflect the changes indicated by the Council. Mr. Luce reviewed the revisions proposed to be included in the.ordinance in conformance with instruc- tions of the Council at its last meeting and clarified that he -had confirmed that the City could not be more restrictive.than the. State Building Code. Councilman Courtney expressed his concern that SR 5 zoning might be permitted in the future -in an increasing number of already developed residential areas in the City. He expressed particular concern 'that, as older-areas of the•City depreciate in value, there,will be increasing pressure for Senior Citizen development.with developers' contending that economics dictate that they-must have a heavier use -for their property. In response to his request that. safeguards be provided-in the ordinance, Mr. Erickson suggested that.it might be appropriate to amend the Comprehensive Plan and the Housing Assistance Plan to include the Senior Citizen Housing District. Councilman Richards clarified that he is not objecting to the Senior Citizen Hous- ing District as such, but believed that it would be more appropriate in an undev- eloped area of the City, rather than in established R -1 residential-areas. Mr. Luce pointed out that it is important that bus service and shopping facilities be available for senior citizens. Zn response to Mr. Luce's suggestion that, if a developer cannot include a laundry facility as a "community facility ",he would probably eliminate the laundry facility altogether, Council suggested that laundry facilities be required in SR District developments. Discussion ensued as to the need for parking facilities in SR District developments, with Mr. Luce recalling that a study which he made..a few years ago indicated that it would be necessary to charge $30 per month per garage stall to break even financially. Discussion ensued as to whether the Council might be considered "capricious" in establishing more restrictive requirements for SR zoning than for market rate apartments. Mr. William Phillips of ,The Lanterns Apartments requested that 101 12/6176 the ordinance provide that garages meet the standards of a separate garage; 2) that there should be a pedestrian crossing for residents every 150 feet; that parking spaces should be designed at no additional cost. Councilman Shaw added that it should be understood:that garages cannot be rented to people other than. •residents of the apartment building. Councilman Courtney requested that the staff review the number of parking stalls actually in use for apartments such as Roybet and the Yorktown Continental Apartments. Mr. Luce suggested that HUD requirements be studied more thoroughly and added that HUD caill not subsidize for building garages. As recommended by Mayor Van Valkenburg, Councilman Shaw's mot- ion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and carried, that the ordinance be referred back to Mr. Erickson to work out revisions for Council approval on January. 17, 1977, and that copies of the revised ordinance be submitted to residents of The Lanterns and other interested neightbors for their review be- fore the meeting. Motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None. ORDIRMCE N0. 811 -A86 GRANTED SECOND READING. As presented by Mr. Luce, man Ric ds offered Ordinance No. 811 -A86 and moved its adoption, recogn that the z g is being approved for the following reasons: 1. The pro, is in confo ce with the Western Edina Plan; 2) The proposed lots meet ing restricts ; 3) The property is a transitional property between the single family ea to the East and the industrial uses to the West: ORDINANCE N0. 811 -A86 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE zONING ORDINANCE (N0. 811) BY ADDING TO THE MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paz aph 1 of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811 o the City is' amended by adding the ollowing thereto: "The extent of the Multiple Residence District is enlar d by the.addition of the following proper t es: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Blo k 2, Nine Mile North 2nd Additio , which is is Sub- District R -2 ". Sec, 2, This.ordiianc shall be in full force and effect upon its passage' and publication. Motion for adoption of the Or Hance was seconded by ouncilman Shag. Rollcall: • Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Sc 'dt, Shaw, Van V kenbur Ijays : None Ordinance Adopted. /. ATTESTi yor City .Clerk RYAN'S ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY P PROVAL. Mr. Luce presented Ryan's Addition, located at the Northeast co er £Limerick Lane and Brook Drive, for Preliminary plat approval, not t thi ping lat had been continued from the meeting of November 15, 1976. Mr. uce exp ed that the proponents are re- questing to subdivide Lot 4, Blo 9, LaBu Vista Addition so that they may create two lots and an outlet a jacent to Nin Mile Creek which would be dedicated for park purposes, but that t Environmental ality Commission and the Planning Commission had recommended d sal of the plat f the following reasons: 1) The lot-sizep would be inconsis ant with other lots the LaBuena Vista Addition, and the interior lot wool be only 117 feet deep t areas subdivision regulations require a minimum lot de h of 120 feet; 2) Ther have been five requests for further subdivision in he LaBuena Vista Addition w ch have been denied by the Planning Commission /or the Council. One request as appealed to the court, which upheld the Cit s decision and found that peopl who purchased lots in that subdivision had r on to assume that the lot sizes in at area would not be changed; 3) Alt an there are similar lot sizes in th subdivision directly across Brook Drs e, Limerick Lane provides an excellent 'viding line betweea LaBuena Vista d"tion and the surrounding area. A symme y of lot sizes and houses presen y exists within the LaBuena Vista Addition ch would be altered by this subd' ision. Mrs. John E. Ryan, owner of the lot in question, referred to A. petition igned by owners of twelve adjacent properties (th name of Mrs. Curt Vining' 6 9 Brook Drive, having been withdrawn from the petit on) which indicated their su ort of the plat. Mrs. Ryan pointed out that none of t e neighbors had. come to he meeting to object to the proposal. She said that the newly formed lot would comparable in size to the lots facing on Brook Drive since it has 116 front feet contains 12,200 square feet, well above the Edina minimum of 9,000 square 17k 1 1 I 1/17/77 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw. 59 . Rollcall: Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt (except as to Street'Improvement BA -223), Shaw'(except as to Watermain Improvements Nos. WM -315 and WM -317) jf VanValkenburg Nays: Shaw as to Watermaiu Improvements Nos. WM -315 and WM -317 Schmidt as to Street Improvement No. BA -223 Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A87 GRANTED FIRST READING. Mr. Luce recalled that First Read- ing of Ordinance No. 811 -A87 had been continued most recently from the meeting of December S, 1976, and advised that, as directed by Council and requested by residents in the area, the ordinance as revised had been mailed out for review and comments of residents. No objections or comments being heard, Councilman Courtney offered Ordinance No. 811-k87 for First Reading and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE N0. 811 -A87 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) TO ESTABLISH THE SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE DISTRICT, AND ADDING DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by renumbering Section 12 03 (Definitions) and Section 13 (Administration) to Section 13 and Section 14, (o respectively. Sec. 2. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by adding a new district to the list of districts therein contained, as follows: "Senior'Citizen Residence District (Section 12)." Sec. 3. Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by adding a new Section 12, as Q follows: - "Sec. 12. Senior Citizen Residence District "1. Purpose and Intent. The City Council of the City of Edina finds that FTherefore, ere is a need in the City of Edina for affordable housing for .elderly citizens, d that the increasing population of elderly residents should have available.to em pleasant, safe, and economical housing in the City of Edina designed to tisfy the special social and physical needs of this segment of the population. the Senior Citizen Residence District is hereby established to accom- ' date these needs and to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the sidents of the City. "The standards contained herein are intended to permit residences that have mass and intensity of activity that is similar to multiple family residences with the same numerical identification defined in Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811. "When considering petitions for the transfer of land to the Senior Citizens Residence District, the Edina Planning Commission and Council shall consider the then most recent Housing Assistance Plan approved by.the Council, and only those properties that are designated by"or shown on such plan as possible locations for senior citizen residences shall be considered.for transfer to, or transferred.to, the Senior Citizen Residence District. "It is not the.purpose and intent of the Senior Citizen Residence District to allow, and there'shall not be allowed in the Senior Citizen Residence District, couvelescent, nursing, rest, boarding care, or similar types of resi- dences, homes, or facilities. "2. Senior Citizen Residence District Boundaries. The Senior Citizen Residence District hereby.established shall be further subdivided into subdistricts designated as District SR-3, District SR -4 and District SR -5, and shall be located as shown by amendments hereafter.made to this paragraph. "3. General Standards. Restrictions-and requirements set out in Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 811, in paragraph 3 (Restrictions on Lot Area, Building Bulk and Setbacks), paragraph 4 (Building Design and Cons- truction), paragraph 5 (Distance Between Buildings), paragraph 7 (Accessory Build- ings), and paragraph 7 (Parking), relative to the R -3, R -4 and R -5 Districts, shall apply to the SR -3, SR -4, and SR -5 Districts, respectively'except . as speci- fically modified by this Section 12, and in eveiy case the most restrictive applicable standard set out in said paragraphs shall govern unless specifically modified by the provisions of this Section 12, in which case the provisions of this Section 12 shall govern. "4. Specific Uses Permitted in Districts. The following uses are permitted when a building permit and occupancy certificate have been approved by the Plan- ning Director and issued by the Building Inspector, and no person shall erect, alter, enlarge, move,'demolish, use, .occupy, or maintain any building, structure, improvement, or premises without first'having obtained such permits: "(a) Principal Uses. "District SR -3: "(1) Senior citizen residences containing not less than three nor more than 12 dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwell- ing units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two 1/17/77 INividuals one of whom is 62 years of - age or over, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen residence. "Districts SR-4 and SR -5: "(1) Senior citizen residences containing five or more dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of.whom is 62 years of age or over, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen residence. . "(b) Accessory pses. In addition to those subordinante sues that are clearly.and customarily incident to the principal uses, such as driveways, park- ing areas, and garages, the community facilities required by paragraph 6 of this section will .be permitted on the lot occupied by the principal use. "5. Restrictions on Lot.Area, Building Bulk, and Setbacks. "(a) Required Lot Area. The minimum lot areas, the maximum allowances, and schedule of allowances set out in paragraph 3 of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811, used in the calculation of required lot area, will be applicable to Districts SR -3, SR -4, and SR -5, respectively, and, in addition, the following allowances are hereby added to to the schedule of allowances: "District Basis and Amount of Allowance "SR-3 For each senior citizen dwelling unit; subtract 1500 sq.,-ft. "SR -4 and SR -5 For each senior citizen dwelling unit; subtract 1000 sq. ft. "(b) Lot coverage and Floor Area Ratio (FAR_)._ "District. Maximum Lot Coverage Maximum FAR "SR-3 and SR-4 35% - - "SR - -S 30% 1.2 "(c) Useable Lot Area. "District, Square Feet Per Senior Citizen Dwelling Unit. "SR -3, SR-4, 200, provided a minimum of'25% of the Useable Lot and SR-5 Area is designed, constructed, and equipped for (for 5 and recreational use of the occupants of the resi- 6 story ' dente and their guests. buildings) SR -5 (for 100, provided a minimum of 25% of the Useable Lot ' buildings Area is designed, constructed; and equipped for over 6 recreational use of the occupants of the resi- stories) dente and their guests. "6. Building Design and Construction: "(a) Floor ARea. The minimum net floor area of a senior citizen dwell - ing unit shall be not less than 550 square feet, and the maximum net floor area shall be not more than 650 square feet. "(b) Community Facilities. Senior citizen residences shall-provide recreational, service, and meeting facilities for the use and 'enjoyment of the residents of the building and their guests, with a minimum net floor area of 1250 square feet or 15 square feet for each senior citizen dwelling unit, which- ever is greater. "The facilities shall be indoor space furnished and conditioned for occupancy all year. They may consist of meeting rooms, hobby rooms, game rooms, swi�miag pools, exercise facilities, group kitchen facilities, and similar uses. 6utdoor areas, laundry rooms, storage areas, mechanical rooms, hallways, foyers, office, commercial or any circulation space or purely ornamental areas-shall not be included to satisfy this requirement. It lities and equipment, (c) Laundry Facilities. Adequate laundry faci including automatic clothes washing and drying machines, laundry tubs, and counter space shall be provided in each senior citizen residence, in a separate room with a'minimum floor area of 120 square feet. "7" Parking. Senior citizen residences shall provide parking that conforms to the setback, screening, surfacing, and size requirements for multiple family residences.set out in paragraph 7 of'Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811, except as modifi-ed.by the following standards: ' "(a) One completely enclosed and one exposed parking space-is required for each non - senior citizen dwelling unit. One enclosed or exposed parking .space is required for each senior citizen dwelling unit; provided, however, one -fialf enclosed or exposed parking space is required per senior citizen dwell- ing unit in a senior citizen dwelling unit in a senior citizen residence that has an entrance located within 500 feet of a public bus stop that has a minimum of•20 scheduled busses per day. . "(b) In. addition, one completely enclosed parking space us required for each vehicle owned by the management or stored on the-site, and one exposed parking space is required for each employee who is not a resident of the senior citizen residence. 1/17/77- "(c) A minimum -of 75 %-of the parking required herein for senior citi Al zen residences must be-totally enclosed within the-principal building or an 1 asses'soiy building. / "(d) All parking spaces shall be used only by the occupants of the senior citizen residence and their guests and visitors. They may, nowever, also be used on a temporary basis by others while making deliveries to an occupant or while doing work on the residence or site." Sec. 4. Section 13 (Definitions) of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended to add the following definitions: " 'Senior Citizen Residence' -- A multiple dwelling unit building or group of buildings specifically designed for use by individuals 62 years of age or over, provided the following criteria are" satisfied: "(1) The site is within an SR -3, SR-4, or SR -5 district "(2) All dwelling units other than the caretaker's or resident manager's unit are single citizen dwelling units and are occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over. " 'Senior Citizen Dwelling Unit' — A one bedroom apartment with a kitchen, living and storage space, the net floor area ahich shall be not less than 550 square feet nor more than 650 square feet, and specifically designed for occupancy by a single individual 62 years of age or over. ": Sec. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passageand publication. LOT 8, BLOCK 2 MENDELS HN HEIGHTS DIVISION APPROVED. Affidavits of Not/ied pre- LOT by Clerk, approve as to form and orderea placed on file. Mr. Luc recalled that there had' n a proposal.to plat.this property which was by Council on December 6, 76, because it would have created two builds lots. He explained that at that time it had been discovered that a lot in the area had been sold and said at the proposed lot division would mere confirm that division. Mr. Luce emph ized that the division would not crea e an addi- tional buildable lot and that anning.Commission had recommended a proval. Mr. Ed Zatarga, 6324 Waterman Ave., as told by an unidentified lady presenting Mrs. Emma England, owner of prop ty at 604-Blake Road, that the previous Scot: Lewis plat has.been dropped and t t there will be no attempt extend Waterman Avenue West of Blake Road. No fur er discussion being heard Councilman ' Courtney offered the following reso ution and moved its ado ion: RESO ION WHEREAS, the following described trac of land are now s parate parcels: Lot 8, Block 2, Mendelssohn Heigh s; and That part of Lot 29, Mendelssohn, d part of va ted Waterman Avenue and Main Street described as follows;• etinniug at he Judicial Monument.at the Northeast corner of El-Rancho Additi n; thence'Southerly along the East line of said E1 Rancho Addition to an inters tion with a line parallel with and 396 feet North of the South line o sai Lot 29; thence East along said parallel line and its extension to the line of Mirror Lake Terrace as now laid out and monumented; thence Nort rly along said West line to the Southwesterly line of Blake Road; theac rthwesterly along said South- westerly line to.an intersection with 1 parallel with and 20 feet South of the South line of Block 2, ndelss ba Heights, as now laid out and moaumented; thence West. along last aid paral el line to an intersection Frith the Northerly extension of t "East line f said E1 Rancho Addition; thence Southerly along the ext ion of said E t line to the point of beginning; and WHEREAS, the owners of'the above t acts of land desire to. subdivide said tracts into the following described new d separate parcels ( erein called. "Parcels"): Lot'8, Block 2, Mendelsso Heights and that part o Lot 29, Mendelssohn, and part of vacated Wate Avenue and Main Street, escribed as follows: - Beginning at the Judicia Monument at the Northeast c er of E1 Rancho Addition; thence South ly along East line of said E1 ch6 Addition to an intersection with line parallel with and 396 feet orth of the South line of said Lot 29; hence East.along said parallel lin and its exten- sion to the West 1 e of Mirror Lake•Terrace as now laid ut and monu- mented; thence No herly along said West line to the South esterly line of Blake Road; ace Northwesterly along said Southwester l line to an intersection h'a line parallel with and 20 feet South of he South line of Block 2, delssohn Heights as.uow laid out and monument e ; thence West along st said parallel line to an intersection with th Northerly extension f the East line of said El Rancho Addition; thence utherly along th extension of -said East line to the point of beginning xcept that part ly g.Easterly of:tbe Southerly extension of the Easterly line of -said L t 8, Block 2, Mendelssohn Heights; and 2/7/77 .� 72 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Rollcall: Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE N0. 811 -A87 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Luce presented Ordinance No. 811 -A87 for Second Reading. Mr. William Phillips of The Lanterns referred to a "Rental Housing Task Force Study" for the City of Minneapolis which indicates the need for additional market rate apartments. He suggested that property in the 50th and France area is valuable real estate that would provide housing for Edina residents who have already raised their families and who would move into apartments if they were available at reasonable market rate prices. Mr. Phillips also contended that it should not be necessary to rely'on federally subsidized loans. Mr. Lawrence Laukka,'4513 Browndale Ave., and Mr. Robert Martinson spoke in opposition to the section of the ordinance which requires :5 total parking spaces per unit, in comparison to HUD's requirement of .25 parking spaces per unit. Mr. Martinson said that it would cost $4,000 per parking stall and that inside heated stalls could run as high as $10,000 per stall. He contended that these parking stalls would have to rent for $35,00 per month and that such rates would be a burden on elderly residents of the apartments. Mayor Van Valkenburg advised that the number oil parking stalls required was based on an analysis made by Mr.: Luce and referred to the variance contained in the ordinance under which one -half enclosed or exposed parking space is required per senior citizen dwelling unit in a senior citizen residence that has an entrance located within 500 feet of a public bus stop that has a minimum of 20 scheduled buses.per day. Mr. Luce commented that it is important to assist developers by encouraging them to bring this type of housing to'the City.. Following discussion, Councilman Shaw offered the following ordinance for Second Reading and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 811• -A87 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) TO ESTABLISH THE SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE DISTRICT, AND ADDING DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by renumbering Section 12 (Definitions) and Section 13 (Administration) to Section 13 and Section 14, ' respectively. - Sec. 2. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by adding a new dis- trict to the list of districts therein contained, as follows: "Senior Citizen Residence District (Section '12). " Sec. 3. Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended by adding a new Section 12, as follows: "Sec. 12. Senior Citizen Residence District "1. Purpose and Intent. The City Council of the City of Edina finds that there is Sneed in the City of Edina for affordable housing for elderly citizens, and that the increasing population of elderly'sesidents should have available to them pleasant, safe, and economical housing in the City of Edina designed to satisfy the special, - social and physical needs of this segment of the population. There- fore, the Senior Citizen Residence District is hereby established to accommodate these needs and to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the residents of.the City. " The standards contained herein are intended to permit residences that have a mass and intensity of activity that is similar to multiple family residences with the same numerical identification defined in Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811. "When considering petitions for the transfer of land to the Senior Citizens Residence District, the Edina Planning Commission and Council shall consider the then most recent Housing Assistance Plan approved by the Council, and only those properties that are designated by or shown on such plan as possible locations for senior citizen residences shall be' considered for transfer to, or transferred to, the Senior Citizen Residence District. "It is not the purpose and intent of the .Senior Citizen Residence District to allow, and there shall not be allowed in the Senior Citizen Residence District, convalescent, nursing, rest, boarding care', or similar types of residences, homes, or facilities. • "2. Senior Citizen Residence District Boundaries. The Senior Citizen Resi deuce District hereby established shall be further subdivided into subdi.stricts designated as District SR -3, District SR -4. and District SR -5, and shall be located as shown by amendments hereafter made to this paragraph. "3. General Standards. The restrictions and requirements set out'in Section 4 (Multiple Residence District of Ordinance No. 811, in paragraph 3 (Restrictions on Lot Area, Building Bulk and Setbacks), paragraph 4 (building Design and Construction), paragraph 5 (Distance between Buildings), paragraph 6 (accessory Buildings), and paragraph 7 (Parking), relative to the R -3, R -4 and R -5 Districts, shall apply to the SR -3, SR -4, and SR -5 Districts, respectively, except as speci- 2/7/77 73 fically modified by this Section 12, and in every case the most restrictive appli- cable standard set out in said pkragraphs.shall govern unless specifically modified by the provisions of this Section 12, in which case the provisions of this Section 12 shall govern. "4. Specific.Uses Permitted in Districts. The following uses are permitted when a building permit and occupancy certificate have been approved by the Plan- ning Director and issued by the Building Inspector, and no person shall erect, alter, enlarge.' move, demolish, use, occupy, or maintain any building, structure, improvement or premises without first having obtained such permits: '.'(a), Principal Uses. "District SR -3: "(1) Senior citizen residences containing not less than three nor more than 12 dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals, one of whom is 62 years of age or over, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen residence. "Districts SR--4 and sR -5: "(1) Senior citizen residences containing not less than three nor more than 12 dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwell - inging units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior CO citizen residence. "(b) Accessory Uses. In addition to those subordinate uses that ate clearly and customarily incident to.the principal uses, such as driveways, parking areas, and garages, the community facilities required by paragraph 6 of this section will be permitted on the lot occupied by the principal use. "5. Restrictions on Lot Area, Building Bulk, and Setback's. "(a) Required Lot Area, The minimum lot areas, the maximum allowances, and schedule of allowances set'out in paragraph 3 of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 811, used in the calculation of required lot arda, will be applicable to Dis- tricts SR -3, SR -4, and SR -5, respectively, and, in addition, the following allow - ances are hereby added to the schedule of allowances: "District. Basis and Amount of-Allowance "SR -3, For each senior citizen dwelling unit, ' subtract 1500 sq. ft, "SR -4 and SR -5 For each senior citizen dwelling unit; subtract 1000 sq. ft. "(b) Lot Coverage and Floor Area Ratio (FAR). " District . M¢ntmtmi Lot Coverage -Maximum FAR . "SR -3 and SR -4 351' - - - "SR -5 30% .1.2 "(c) Useable Lot Area. "District Square Feet Per Senior Citizen Dwelling Unit "SR - -3, SR -4 and 200, provided a minimum of 25% of the Useable SR -5 (for 5 and 6 Lot Area is designed, constructed, and equipped story buildings) for recreational use of the occupants of the residence and their guests. "SR -5 (for buildings over 100, provided a minimum of 25% of the Useable 6 stories) Lot Area is designed, constructed, and equipped for recreational use of the occupants of the residence and their guests. 16. Building Design and Construction. "(a) Floor Area. The minimum net floor area of a senior citizen dwelling unit shall not be less than 550 square feet, and the maximum net floor area shall not be more.than 650 square feet. "(b) Community Facilities. Senior citizen residences shall provide recre� ational, service, and meeting facilities for the use and enjoyment of the residents of the building and their guests, with a minimum net floor area of 1250 square feet or 15 square feet for each senior citizen dwelling unit, whichever is greater. "The facilities shall be indoor space furnished and conditioned for occu- pancy all year. They may.consist of meeting rooms, hobby rooms, game rooms, swimming pools, exercise facilities, group kitchen facilities, and similar uses. Outdoor uses, laundry rooms, storage areas, mechanical rooms, hallways, foyers, office, commercial, or any circulation space or purely ornamental areas shall not be included to satisfy this requirement. "(c) Laundry Facilities. Adequate laundry facilities and equipment, includ- ing automatic clothes washing and drying machines, laundry tubs,' and counter space, shall be provided in each .senior citizen residence, in a separate room with a minimum floor area of 120 square feet, 117. Parking. Senior citizen residences shall provide parking that conforms 2/7/77 . 74 to the setback.-screening, surfacing,-and size requirements for multiple family residences set out in paragraph 7 of Sertion 4 of Ordinaiice•No.'811, except as modified by the following standards: ' "(a) One completely enclosed and one exposed parking'space is required for each non - senior citizen dwelling unit. One enclosed or exposed parking space is required for each senior citizen dwelling unit; provided, however, one -half enclosed or exposed parking space is required per senior citizen dwelling unit in a senior citizen residence that has an entrance located within 500 feet of a public bus stop that has a minimum of 20 scheduled buses per day. "(b) In addition, one completely enclosed parking space is required for each vehicle owned by the management and stored on the site, and one exposed park- ing space is required for each employee who is not a resident of the'senior citizen residence. • "(c) A minimum of 75% of the parking required herein for senior citizen residences must be totally enclosed within the principal building or an accessory building. "(d) All parking spaces shall be used only by the occupants of the senior citizen residence and their guests and visitors. They may, however, also be used on a temporary basis by others while making deliveries to an occupant or while doing work on the residence or site," Sec. 4. Section 13 (Definitions) of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended to add to the following definitions: "'Senior Citizen Residence' .-- A multiple dwelling unit building or group of buildings specifically designed for use by individuals 62 years of age or over, provided the following criteria are satisfied: "(1) The site is within an SR,3, SR-4 or SR -5 District, "(2) All dwelling units other than the caretaker's or resident manager's unit are senior citizen dwelling units and are occupied by a single individual 62 years.of age or over or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over. "'Senior Citizen Dwelling Unit' -- A one - bedroom apartment with a kitchen, bathroom, living and storage space, the net floor area of which shall be not less than 550 square feet or more than 650 square feet, and specifically designed for occupancy by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over." Sec. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication: Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Courtney. -Rollcal l : Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays :. • None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: mayor City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 8 -AS8 GRANTED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Noti a were presented by the Clerk, app oved as to form and ordered placed on file, Luce presented Ordinance No. 811- 8 for First Reading, recalling that t ' orary sales in the Planned Industrial V1,,strict are permitted only by ordi5pafee. The date established in the existing ord' ce having expired, Planning C ssion recommended extend- ing the date for one a itional year. No objectio being heard, Councilman Courtney offered Ordinan a No. 811 -A88 for First eading as follows: ORDINANCE N0. 8 -A88 AN ORDINANCE NDING THE ZON G ORDINANCE (NO. 811) TO EXTEND T EXPIRATION TE OF THE AMENDMENT THERET MADE IN 0 ANCE NO. 811 -A60 THE CITY.COUNCIL OF THE CiiY OF DINA, NNESOTA, OR Section 1. Subparagraph (c) of aragraph 3 of Section 10 of Ordinance No. 811 (Temporary Retail Sales) is he y amended by deleting from sentence (9) thereof the date "December 31, 197 and inserting in lieu thereof the date "Dec- ember 31, 1977 ". Sec. 2. This Ordinance s 1 be full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A89 by the Clerk, approved Ordinance No. 811 -A89 twins the Minnehaha G on the Register of s the zoning. No ob' ct: ordinance for First Re fED FIRST READIN Affidavits of Notice were presented to form and ordere• placed on file. Mr. Sand presented First Reading, advi ing that this parcel of land con - Hall and the Old Ca 11 School, both buildings being c Places. Mr. Foster unwiddie urged the approval of being heard, Couacilma)3 Richards offered the following 4t-5 1 J n� ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A152 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811)' SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT TO ADD HANDICAPPED UNITS AS AN ALLOWED USE, TO ALLOW TWO BEDROOM UNITS, TO PROVIDE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM REQUIRED FLOOR AREAS FOR HANDICAPPED AND TWO BEDROOM UNITS, AND TO REDUCE ENCLOSED PARKING REQUIREMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph (a) , of Paragraph 4, of Section 12 or Ordin- ance No. 811, is hereby amended to read as follows: "District SR -3: 11(1) Senior Citizen residences containing not less than three nor more than 12 dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over, or a handicapped individual, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen resident. "District SR -4 and SR -5: 11(1) Senior Citizens residences containing five or more dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over, or a handicapped individual, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen residence. Section 2. Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph 6, Section 12 of Ordinance No. 811, is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) Floor Area. The minimum net floor area of a one bedroom senior citizen dwelling unit shall not be less than 550 square feet, and the maximum net floor area shall be not more than 650 square feet. The net floor area for a one bedroom unit designed for occupancy by a handicapped individual shall not be less than 550 square feet, and the maximum net floor area shall be not more than '700 square feet. Two bedroom senior citizen dwelling units shall have a minimum net floor area not less than 750 square feet, and a maximum net floor area of 850 square feet. No more than 10% of the dwelling units in any senior citizen residence may contain more than one bedroom. Section 3. Subparagraph (c) of Paragraph 7, Section 12 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(c) A minimum of 500 of the parking required herein for senior citizen residences must be totally ehclosed within the principal building or an accessory building W' ii Ordinance No. 811 -A152 Page 2 Section 4. The definitions of Senior Citizen Residence and Senior . Citizen Dwelling unit in Section 13 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 13 (Definitions) :. "'Senior Citizen Residence' -- A multiple dwelling unit building or group of buildings specifically designed for use by individual 62 years of age or over, or by a handicapped individual, provided the following criteria are satisfied: 11(1) The site is within an SR -3, SR -4 or SR -5 District. (2) All dwelling units other than the caretaker's or resident manager's unit are senior citizen dwelling units and are occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over, or by a handicapped individual. "'Senior Citizen Dwelling Unit' -- A one bedroom apartment with a kitchen, bathroom, living and storage space, the net floor area of which shall be not less than 550 square feet nor more than 650 square feet, and specifically designed for occupancy by a single individual 62 years of age or over. A one bedroom apartment with a kitchen, bathroom, living and storage space, the net floor area of which shall be not less than 550 square feet nor more than 700 square feet, when the unit is specifically designed -for occupancy by a handicapped individual. A two bedroom apartment with a kitchen, bathroom, living and storage, the net floor area of which shall be not less than 750 square feet nor more than 850 square feet, and specifically designed for use by two .. individuals, one of whom is 62 years of age or over. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: September 21, 1981 Second Reading: Waived Published in the Edina Sun on September 30, 1981 ATTEST: City Clerk o r 1`i l! v MVor (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4sol WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 ORDINANCE NO- 1111-A152 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. Sit) SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT TO ADD HANDICAPPED UNITS AS AN ALLOWED USE, TO ALLOW TWO BEDROOM UNITS, TO PROVIDE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM REQUIRED FLOOR AREAS FOR HANDICAPPED AND ocnBCE ENCLOSED PARKING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY I OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DA1NS: Se-ction h1 4. of Subparagraph Sec Section Of Or- d Yaragrap i inance No. ell, is hereby amended to read as follows: ; t.,: .: "District SR -3: '•(1) senior Citizen residences con- I tatning not less than three nor more than 12 dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior ci lzelnd welling units and yoccupied by individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over, or a handicapped indi- !, vidual, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager o[ the i senior citizen resident. 'District SR -4 and SR -5: "(1) Senior Citlzena residences �natzinl nS five o: nn:eF thsii hr ( t 7/20/81 180 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby . approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof .as sep- arate tracts of lead but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other prgvision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdi- vision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent=° ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courti:ey Nays: None Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE N0. 811 -A149 GRANTED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Notice were pre- seated by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes recalled that, at the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of July 6,' 1981, a resolution was adopted authorizing acquisition of property owned by Hedberg & Sons and by 7500 York Cooperative, which property is generally loca- - ted West of York Ave. and North and South of Parklawn Ave. He described a land trade which would provide a more suitable site and advised that this matter is being presented to Council at this time for Council's review and reaction be- fore the developer pi-oceeds further with site plans. Council was advised that the proposed development is for a seven story, 100 unit building-with 90 one bedroom units, five one bedroom units for the handicapped and five two bedroom units and that craft rooms, community rooms, lounges and arts and crafts rooms will be included, along with 44 exposed parking spaces and 30 garage spaces. Mr. Hughes explained that the proposed project will be built as,- Section 202 elderly building, with Community Development Corporation, a division of the Catholic Archdiocese, as the applicant /developer and Edina Community Lutheran Church as the local sponsor, and that seventy of the proposed units will be subsidized under the Section 8 Rent'Assistance program with the remaining units to be offered on a market rate basis. Mr. Hughes advised that the proposed development conforms to the draft Comprehensive plan and that the density of 25 units per acre compares with other buildings in the area. Council was advised that the plan is lacking in garage , spaces as required by ordinance, but that evidence will be submitted documenting anticipated parking needs. It was also pointed out that, since the ordinance was adopted limiting senior housing to one bedroom per unit, there are often circum- stances where two bedrooms are necessary. Mr. Paul Madson with Arvid Elness Arch- itects showed drawings;of the proposed building and reviewed the amenities. He explained that he has a tight time frame and hopes to close with H.U.D by August 15, 1981. Mr. Madson also advised that there is ample room to build more garages in the event that the garage variance is not granted, but explained that, in the 202 Program, H.U.D. does not recognize garages and that budget limitations limit the number of garages that can be constructed with this type of financing. A resident of Edina Place was told that the building would have a 67 foot set- back from the South lot line. Mr. Walter Baker, representing 7500 York Associates, said that he had no objections to the proposal, as long as the land exchange can be completed, but that•he would object if the land exchange could not be accom- pli.shed and condemnation become necessary. He also expressed his objections to- the exterior finish of the building proposed by Mr. Madson. In response to Mem- ber Richards' suggestion that land negotiations should be between 7500 York Coop- erative and Hedberg & Sons, Mr. Hughes explained that it is the H.R.A. that is encouraging the project. Mr. Erickson clarified that Community Development funds are being used and that the H.R.A. should have control in order that proper steps are taken which will conform to State law and Federal regulations. No further discussion being heard, Member Bredesea offered Ordinance No. 811 -A149 for First Reading, subject to the following conditions: 1) that the building have a brick exterior; 2) that evidence of parking need be furnished the City; 3) that the Zoning Ordinance be amended to allow a maximum of 107. two bedroom units of-not... more than 825 square feet; and 4) that an exchange be made of the South two acres (approximate) of the Hedberg property for•the property of 7500 York Cooperative on York-Ave. prior to final rezoning approval; and 5) that the site be controlled by Community Development Corporation* or. the Edina H.R.A. at the time of Second Reading *and the time of rezoning: ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A149 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT• THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 2 of Section 12 of Ordinance 811 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: A t$ 7/20/81 181 "The extent of the Senior Citizen Residence District is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Outlot A, Ebenezer Society 1st Addition and the West one half of the Northwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter of the South- west one quarter of Section 32, Township 28, Range 24" Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. BRANDT ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT. CONTINUED TO AUGUST 3, 1981. As recommended by Mr. Hughes, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, continu- ing preliminary plat of Brandt Addition to August 3, 1981. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion.carried. CENTER HOMES MIDWEST GARAGE VARIANCE DENIED. Mr. Hughes recalled that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments has denied the request of Centex Homes Midwest for a variance from the required 1.25 enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit to one enclosed parking space. He recalled that the Community Development and Planning Commission has recommended that the City and Centex enter into a Proof of Parking agreement whereby the first phase'of the project would serve as a sample to deter- mine the need for and marketability of the garages. In response to questions as (D to whether 1.25 enclosed parking spaces per dwelling are actually necessary, Member Richards recalled past discussions of Council in which this number of park -- ing spaces was considered a minimum.,- Mr. Timothy R. Eller, Vice President of Centex Homes Midwest, Inc., said that his company has determined that it is not fair for all owners to pay the extra cost of garages when they are required by only a few. Stating that he could see no evidence that the need of parking spaces Q required by ordinance should be reduced, Member Richards'motion to reaffirm '. the .deririibn of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to deny the variance-from 1.25 enclosed parking stalls was seconded by Member Bredeseu.. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. RAUENHORST CORPORATION SIGN VARIANCE DENIED. Mr. Hughes presented the appeal of ' Rauenhorst Corporation for a second free - standing building identification sign for the Edina Office Center located on .France Ave. at W. 76th Street. He showed a picture of the building with the:exist3ng sign and explained that Control Data has requested installation of a second sign about half way'down the site on France Ave. He explained that this additional sign would be permitted if the property was in the Office Building District but that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments had denied the request, largely on the basis that there are other buildings with simi- lar potential in the Planned Industrial District and that.a precedent would be set if this sign should be allowed. .Mr. Hughes suggested the possible amendment7 to the.sign ordinance so that all office buildings in the Planned Industrial District could enjoy the same sign privileges as buildings in the Office Building District. Ms. Michele Foster, representing Rauenhorst Corporation, referred to a letter from Rauenhorst Corporation setting forth reasons for granting the variance. She pointed out that this property was zoned Planned Industrial District for the mutual benefit of the City of Edina and Rauenhorst Corporation and that "due to the unique history and extensive discussions regarding development of this area" that a precedent would not be set regarding other sites in the City. .Ms. Foster said that the ordinance is inconsistent inasmuch as office developments located on corner sites in commercial, regional medical and office building districts are permitted one sign for each street frontage and that even multi- tenant buildings in industrial districts are permitted additional wall signs for each tenant with a private entry. She pointed out also that the total square footage of the two signs is less than the 80 square feet permitted on one sign. Mr. Milles•Roher, representing Control Data, explained that the existing sign on the corner is on a 45 degree angle and that customers have trouble finding their office inasmuch as this sign cannot be seen easily from France Ave. Mr. James Nygaard of Rauen- horst Corporation, explained that the..existimg sign could be moved and additional words added, but that.the sign would not be as pleasing. It was also pointed out that if Control Data had a separate entrance, they could have a wall sign. Member Bredesen's motion granting the request for an additional sign on the site was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Turner Nays: Richards, Schmidt, Courtney Motion failed.. AN 228 RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR EDINA OFFICE CENTER 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat known as Edina Office Center 2nd Addition, platted by Rauenhorst Corporation, and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of September 21, 1981, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval conditioned upon: 1) dedication of necessary right of way for France Avenue, and 2) owner of Lot 1 entering into an agreement with the City and placed of record which acknowledges the reduced lot size and that the use.of the existing building is limited to uses which can satisfy parking require- ments by way of the existing parking lot. Motion for approval of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall : .Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney. Bays: None Resolution adopted. Member Bredesen noted that the City has been pleased with the work done by Rauen- horst Corporation over the past several years. ' SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT AMENDMENT (ORDINANCE N0. 811 -A152) ADOPTED; SECOND READING WAIVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes recalled that the Senior Citizen Residence District Ordinance was adopted several years ago but has never been put to the test. With the rezoning and plat approval for Eden.Place Addition for an elderly housing project, a•number%of changes to the ordinance were indicated. Mr—Hughes advised that the proposed amendment would add handicapped units as an allowed use, would allow two bedroom units; would provide minimum and maximum required floor areas for handicapped and two bedroom units and would reduce the requirement for enclosed parking. 'Tli@ Planning Commission recommended approval with waiver of second reading of the ordinance. No objections being heard, Member. - Turner offered the following ordinance and moved its adoption wafiring.secoad reading: ORDINANCE NO'. 811 -152 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE DISTRICT TO ADD HANDICAPPED UNITS AS AN ALLOWED USE, TO ALLOW TWO BEDFROOM UNITS, TO PROVIDE MIN IM@f AND MAXIMUM REQUIRED FLOOR AREAS FOR HANDICAPPED AND TWO BEDROOM UNITS, AND TO REDUCE ENCLOSED PARKING REQUIREMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph (a).of Paragraph 4, of Section 12 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended to read as. follows: "District SR -3: " "(1) Senior Citizen residences containing not less than three nor more than. 12 dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over, or a handicapped individual, and the other dwelling unit shall be designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen resident. "District SR-4 and SR -5: "(1) Senior Citizens residences containing five or more dwelling units, all but one of which shall be senior citizen dwelling units and occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over, or a handicapped individual, and the other dwelling unit shall be '. designed for and used by the caretaker or resident manager of the senior citizen residence. Section 2. Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph 6, Section 12 of Ordinance No. 811:. is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) Floor Area. The minimum net floor area of a one bedroom senior citizen dwelling unit shall not be-less than 550 square feet, and the maximum net floor . area shall be not more than 650 square feet. The net floor area for a one bedroom unit designed for occupancy by a handicapped individual shall not be less than 550 square feet, and the maximum net floor area shall be not more than 700 square feet. Two bedroom senior citizen dwelling units shall have a minimum net floor area not less than 750 square feet, and a maximum net floor area of 850 square feet. No more than 10% of the dwelling units in any senior citizen residence may contain more than one bedroom. Section 3. Subparagraph (c) of Paragraph-7, Section 12 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(c) A minimum of 50% of the parking required herein for senior citizen residences must be totally enclosed within the principal building or an accessory building. Section 4. The definitions of Senior Citizen-Residence - and Senior Citizen. Dwelling unit in Section 13 of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby amended to read. as- follows: 1 1 I. 1 • • • r 9%21/81 229 Section 13 (Definitions): .•'Senior Citizen Residence" - A Multiple dwelling unit building or group of buildings specifically designed for use by individual 62-years of age or over, or by. a. handicapped individual, provided the following criteria are satisfied: "(1) . The site is within an SR -3, SR -4 or SR -5 District. (2) All dwelling units otber than the caretaker's or resident manager's unit are senior citizen dwelling units and are occupied by a single individual 62 years of age or over, or two individuals one of whom is 62 years of age or over, or by a handicapped individual. "'Senior Citizen Dwelling Unit' - A one bedroom.apariment with a kitchen, bathroom, living and storage space, the net floor area of which shall be not less than 550 square feet; nor more than 650 square feet, and specifically designed for occupancy by a single individual 62 years of age or over. A one bedroom apartment with a kitchen, bathroom, living and storage space, the net floor area of which shall be not less than 550 square feet nor more than 700 square feet, when the unit is specifically designed for occupancy by a handi- capped individual. A two bedroom apartment with a kitchen, bathroom, living and storage, the net floor area of which shall be not less than 750 square feet nor more than 850 square feet, and specifically designed for use by two individ- uals, one of whom is 62 years of age or over. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Ordinance adopted. Attest: nn '' —A• Acting City Clerk I / Z r I ZONING REQUEST TO C -2 C01 -a ERCIAL DISTRICT.FOR TGM INVESTMENTS CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 1981. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved ' as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the request of TMG Investments for rezoning of property generally located north of Vernon Avenue, east of Summit Avenue and west of Interlachen Boulevard from C -4 Commercial District to C -2 Commercial District. He explained that the property measures approximately 24,000 square feet in area .and is developed with a building which contains a hairdresser, a take -out restaurant and.a vacant automobile service station. Most of the property is zoned C -4 Commercial District, with approxi- mately a 40 foot strip along the west edge being zoned C -2. The proponent is requesting a rezoning of the whole property from C -4 to C -2 Commercial District. Mr.'Hughes advised that preliminary site plans have been submitted in support of the rezoning illustrating a rearrangement of access whereby two curb cuts on Interlachen are proposed to be closed but existing access points on Vernon and Summit would be retained. Parking would*be provided for 30.spaces and landscap- ing included primarily along the street frontage. It is proposed to square off the north side of the building and the area would be enclosed and used princi- pally for trash storage. Exterior of the building would be upgraded, service station features would be eliminated and a uniform exterior signage scheme would be provided. Mr. Hughes explained that although this is a rezoning,�if•.. the requested rezoning to C -2 is approved, variances would be required for parking quantity, parking setback, drive aisle setback and building setback along the westerly property line. It appears that most landscaping on Vernon and Interlachen would be on the rights of way controlled by the County whose policy is to prohibit landscaping on its rights of way. Mr. Hughes added that the Planning Commission considered this request at its last meeting and voted to recommend that the C -2 Commercial District zoning be denied. However, the Commission did recommend the property be zoned 0 -1 Office District. Staff • would concur with.the Commission's recommendation as it would lower the park - ing'requirement for the site. The hairdresser shop and take -out restaurant would be non - conforming uses but could continue to exist as long as those uses continued. It was pointed out.that C -4 Commercial District is special purpose' zoning limited to automobile service stations, car washes and drive -in restau- rants. C -2 zoning allows a variety of uses plus those allowed in C -1. Graphics *dre presented by Ed Kodt, architect for the proposed property improvements, illustrating site plans, elevation drawings and a landscape plan. He advised that'the subject property has been for sale for several months but that.the proponent has not been able to sell it in its current condition. Mr. Greg Gustafson, representing the proponent, explained that presently there is no kR ) i A. I.�HPOAr��P EDINA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Octol ez 31'. 1983' Answering rollcall were Members Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. City of Edina ORDINANCE NO. 116 -A1 EXTENDING MORATORIUM IN THE R -1 ZONING DISTRICT GRANT FIRST READING. Planner Hughes advised that mailed notice had been sent to the list of all non - residential property in the R -1 District who had been notified at the time the moratorium was proposed. The moratorium prohibited construction of new improvements and expansion of existing improvements on land in the R -1 Zoning District except for single family dwellings for a period of ninety days and the proposed amendment would extend it to the first regular Council meeting in January of 1984. This would enable Council to review a draft Zoning Ordinance which will regulate and control, among other things, the size and impact on neighborhood property of non - residential improve-1 ments in the R -1 Zoning District, as established by the existing Zoning Ordinance of Edina. Appearing and speaking in opposition to the ordinance amendment was Tom Donnelly, member of the Building Committee of Our Lady of Grace Church. He commented that the committee has spent the last 18 months on a research and feasibility study regarding projected space needs for the church and the extention of the moratorium would further delay their planning. No further comments being heard, Member Turner offered Ordinance No. 116 -A and moved its adoption with waiver of Second Reading. 'Motion for adoption was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Schmidt Motion failed. (4/5 vote needed to waive .Second Reading) Member Richards thereupon offered Ordinance'No. 116 -A1 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 116 -A1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 116 TO EXTEND THE R -1 ZONING DISTRICT MORATORIUM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 116 preceding the colon is amended to read as follows: "Moratorium. From the effective date of this ordinance to the first Regular Council meeting in January of 1984, subject to earlier termination or extension .by the Edina City Council, the Edina City Council and the Edina City staff shall not:" Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Schmidt Motion carried. REVIEW OF REVISED ZONING ORDINANCE BEGUN.- Mr. Hughes reviewed with Council Members an Executive Summary of the Revised Zoning Ordinance, stating the objectives of the revision, and then pointing out the major revisions of the ordinance. Included were. the following: Section 3. Definitions Section 4. Administration and Procedures Section 7. General Provisions Section 8. Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) Section 9. Double Dwelling Unit (R -2) Section 10. Planned Residence District (PRD) Section 13. Planned Commercial District (PC) Section City Hall 'Planned istr ct Section 17. Heritage Preservation Overlay District 4801 WEST 50TH STREET Section 18. EDINA, MINNESOTA, 5547S4&lcl&n FAX 952- 26-039 Floodplai n�,e t FAX 952 - 826 -0390 We f TTY 952 -826 -0379 19. Parking andWLo� �a d� 0 Section 20. Landscaping and Screening '`10/'31/83 11'7 PARTICIPATION IN EDINAMITE '83 SERVICE AUCTION DISCUSSED. Member Turner ised that she had conferred urlth Mr. Rosland re arding a ro ect for the Edinamite Service Auction as directed by Mayor Courtney. They would recommend a similar e e t as that of last year to be held at Braemar Park with dinner for !�0 people] @din a by the Council Members and their spouses sometime in January or February of 984. It was informally agreed to commit to such a service project for EDINAMITE '83, with a minimum bid to be determined'for one event and that a second event would only be offered for double the high bid. MEMBERSHIP ON 1984 LMC CONFERENCE PLANNING COMMITTEE NOTED. Member Turner called attention to the memorandum from the. League of Minnesota Cities, asking for interested persons to serve on the 1984 LMC Conference Planning Committee for the Annual Conf- erence to be held in Duluth, June 12 -15. As requested, copies of the memorandum wi11 be included in the next Council packets. No action was taken. Mayor Courtney then declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. City Clerk U m Q 1 952- 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -039C 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 1k NA, M4NNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com f�• '3-/ :16/ 183 Y 183 west side to accomodate State funding requirements as to width. Wendell Malin, 5717 Hansen Road, asked about the proposed roadway changes in elevation. Mr. Hoffman responded that changes will range from 6 inches to 12 inches maximum and that the City would work with property owners on both sides to try to make the roadway fit with th driveways. Grant North, 5804 Hansen Road, asked what the requirements ware for ate Aid funding and if sidewalks were included. He commented that he did not nee a parking lane in front of his hom but that there is a need for a atop sign at sea Road and Grove Street to s w traffic coming off the hill. Mr. Hoffman sta that for State Aid funding, the required minimum widths were 32 feet with no pa ing on either side and 36 set with parking allowed on one side and that the State h imposed minimum width -in order to provide uniformity for collector streets. He tated that sidewalks are a local issue and that the Council for the past ten years h followed a polic of providing'sidewalks on the major streets when improvements a constructed insure pedestrian safety. George Demko, 5716 Hansen Road, questione he placemen of mailboxes in relation to the sidewalk and if problems would arise wi the post office for mail delivery. Mr. Hoffman advised that the recommended pro dure i for the mail vehicles to drive up on the sidewalks to reach the mailboxes,. to rive up on the driveway aprons to the boxes. John Ward, 5916 Hanson Road, ted he would prefer the 32 foot width for the portion south of West 60th Street that State Aid funding could be obtained which would lessen the amount propos t e assessed for that portion. Christian Ries, 5800 Hansen Road, asked how v ated ove Street on the west side would be handled. Mr. Hoffman stated that driveway ron would be constructed for the: road back to those properties and he owners w ld be assessed. Don Berg, 5900 Hansen Road, commented that he w ld prefer to s a new bituminous roadway at (, the 32 foot width without curb d gutter to prese a the country look of the road mand that he was strongly oppose to the proposed si elk. Jay Addy,5801 Hansen Q Road, asked that the residents on Hansen Road be poll as to their preference for a.32 foot versus 36 foot adway, and also as to pu ing in the sidewalk. Pete Obermyer, 5913 Hansen d, stated he would prefer t a 32 foot roadway with State Aid funding be a roved. Harold Duoos, owner o the Westchester Apartments at 5525 Hansen ad, said that if the road is wid ed and improved it will speed up the traff c and that he supported having a s sign at Grove and Hansen. Mr. Duoos ad d that the improvement would take to uch of the lawns on the west side a would reduce the property values. Me r Richards submitted that the resi nts on Hansen Road should be polled on th ssue of the ' roadway width and also the proposed sidewalk so that they could voice their opinions. Member Richards then moved that the improvement hearing on Hansen Road be continued to February 27, 1984, that staff be directed.to take.a poll of the residents with regard to the roadway width and the sidewalk and report the results at that meeting, and that the matter of a stop sign at Grove Street and Hansen Road be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee for their recommendation. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turber, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE; CONTINUED TO 2/6/84. Affidavit of Notice was presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. City Planner Hughes advised that the last time the City adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance was in 1951. Since that time additions have been made and it has been re- codified but never update(i. The objectives of the pro - posed Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance are: 1) to streamline procedural requirements, 2) to establish uniform definitions, 3) to eliminate requirements from which variances have routinely been granted, 4) to gain consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, 5) to reorganize the format of the ordinance, and 5) to avoid' the creation of non - conforming property by enaction of the new ordinance. Mr. Hughes.then summarized the major sections of the new ordinance and the changes being proposed as follows: Section 4. Administration and Procedures - Procedure for conditional use permit; Section 5.. Districts - Multiple residence districts (R -3, R -4, R -5) be eliminated, all multi residential projects be zoned Planned Residential District (PRD), and all other rezonings be via the planned district format; Section 6. District Boundaries All vacant R -3, R -4, or R -5 property be rezoned to R -1 District (involves three properties in the City), all developed R -3, R -4, or R -5 property be rezoned to Planned Residence District (PRD), all 0 -1, 0 -2, C -1, C -2, C -3, C -4 property be zoned to Planned Office District (POD) or Planned Commercial District (PCD); Section 7. General Requirements - Clarification of customary home occupations, regulation of fences in R -1 and R -2 districts, patios and decks included in building coverage with 150 square foot allowance, minimum lot frontage of 30 feet required, lot width be measured at a point 50 feet back from front lot line; Section 8. Parking and Circulation - Fewer parking spaces required for office and retail uses (especially shopping centers /larger office buildings), uniform parking setback requirement, provision for compact parking spaces; Section 10. Landscaping and Screening - Minimum landscaping and screening requirements (applies to buildings of more than 2 units); Section 11. Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) - Churches, schools and'civic institutions permitted only by Uc� 1/16/84 184 conditional use permit, increase in lot coverage for small lots, reduced interior side yard setback for small lots, decks and patio setback requirements, and interim uses of school buildings not used for educational. purposes; Section 12. Double Dwell- ing Unit District (R -2) - Minimum lot width requirement; Section 13. Planned Residence District (PRD, PSR) - New PRD -6 district for rest, convalescent and nursing homes, bonus system to determine final density for new buildings; Section 15. Planned Commercial District (PCD) - Drive - through facilities permitted as accessory use; Section 17. Planned Industrial District (PID) - Maximum building height of four stories. Hr. Hughes next pointed out specific issues which the Council would need to address: 1) accessory: dwelling units in the R -1 District, 2) mechanical amusement devices, and 3) the rezoning of some vacant parcels to R -1. Other rezoning issues in connection with the new zoning map are: 1) all churches are zoned R -1 District with the exception of Colonial Church of Edina which is zoned PRD -1 - recommended that it be rezoned to R -1 District; 2) buildings zoned PID (National Car Rental and two northerly buildings) at 76th Street and France Avenue are developed as office buildings - recommended that they be rezoned to POD; 3) office buildings in the Southdale area zoned Commercial District which likewise could be iezoned t6 POD - recommended they not be rezoned as they comply with the requirements of the Commercial District. Mr. Hughes advised that no property now zoned R -1 District is proposed to be rezoned. He advised that the procedure for adoption of the new Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance would require-two readings and that if First Reading is offered at this meeting that the public hearing be continued to the meeting of February 6, 1984, to accept comments. Member Turner questioned what impact the zoning ordinance would have with regard to the Edina Community Center and the requirement for a conditional use permit lu connection with present tenants and expiration of current leases. Mr. Hughes explained that it would not cause a change in their process, that if a conditional use permit were granted they could continue to lease to the same persons. Mayor Courtney then asked for comment or questions from the public. Merton Willette, 6333 Millers Lane, asked for a clarification of the bonus system for density in the Planned Residential District. Terry Schneider, 5908 Bernard Place, inquired about the new PRD -6 zone and parking requirements for nursing homes. In response to question of Kenneth Harrington, 6813 Southdale Road, as to what notice was given of this hearing, Mr.'-Hughes stated that a notice was mailed to every property owner of record in the City. Mr. Harrington stated that more publicity should be given to alert the community about an ordinance change this comprehensive. Harold Christian- sen, 5805 Kemrich Drilve,-agreed that the comprehensive nature of the ordinance ' requires going slowly with more publication and knowledge to the public, and that he was concerned specifically about the effect it would have on churches. Betty Weiagartner, 7137 Glouchester Avenue, asked for a clarification regarding decks and patios in relation to lot coverage in the R -1 District. Marsh Everson, 6000 Fox Meadow Lane, stated that he was the owner of Rqe of the vacant properties proposed to be rezoned to R -1 District, and that.he, as well as another owner of vacant property, objected to the rezoning and requested that the vacant properties be allowed to exist as zoned at the present time. Member Bredesen asked what the rationale was for rezoning those vacant properties to R -1 District. Mr. Hughes stated that those rezonings are 20 year$ old and since they were zoned the City has adopted the Western Edina-Plan and the Southwest Edina Plan which established density that is less than allowed by those zonings: The Comprehensive Plan process has lowered the density requirement even more. By adopting the new zoning ordinance, those - vacant properties would be viewed as looking at them the first time and density would be based on today's Comprehensive Plan rather than density requirements in 1962. Mr. Hughes suggested, that. alternatives may be: 1). to rezone those vacant properties .to Planned Residence District and require the developer to come through a plan adoption process, or 2) to adopt a section of the ordinance that maintains the present zoning and allows those properties to be developed as now zoned. Kevin pelgersdyk, 4238 Grimes Avenue South, asked for a definition of civic institutions and whether halfway houses would be permitted in.•the 1 -1 District. Mr. Hughes explained that civic institutions are publicly owned and operated, that half -way houses are governed by state statute and not by zoning laws as they are licensed by the state, and that they are allowed uses in several zones including the R -1 District. No further public comment being heard, Council then considered the issue of accessory dwelling units in -the R -1 District and whether it should be included in the ordinance as a± conditional use. Member Turner commented that she felt the concept of accessory dwelling units is a valid one for the community for these reasons: a) the Comprehensive Plan mentions the development of policies and programs that will widen the range of housing choices for our residents, b) accessory units would provide additional rental housing in the City, c) providing an option for persons living alone on limited income to rent out part of their home, and d) addresses the issue of affordable housing for small households. Member Bredesen observed that he has not changed his opinion on accessory housing and reiterated that it would change the nature of the single family neighborhood by creating density of two families living in property designed for one family, that a parent is now permitted to live with a family in a separate area, that he could see no major advantage in permitting accessory housing units but could see it causing potential problems in cutting up properties, and that he felt a major Aas rI 1/16/84 185 concern was to retain and preserve the nature of the single family neighborhood. Member Richards commented that, although he could support the arguments pointed out by Member Turner, he felt that the issue of accessory. housing is looked at as an economic issue, either to maximize a return upon property or as income producing property, rather than trying to solve an articulated need that might exist in the community, that he would like to preserve the existing residential sections of the community and that he would prefer that accessory dwelling units not be included in the proposed zoning ordinance as a conditional use. Member Schmidt and Mayor Courtney stated they were in agreement with the viewpoints expressed by Members•Bredesen and Richards. Next considered by Council was the issue of mechanical amusement devices. Member Turner suggested that two machines be'allowed as an.accessory, use, in the pc-1. District with unlimited number of machines allowed in PC -2 and PC -3 Districts for these reasons: a) currently the City allows other forms of amusement such as bowling alleys and pool halls in both the community commercial areas (PCT2) and the -regional commercial areas (PC -3), b) there seems to be no problem with unlimited.. number of machines in the PC -2 and PC -3 zones as currently allowed, and c) while there is a difference in the nature of the neighborhood commercial area, there is no reason to eliminate the machines all together if they are there as an accessory use. and if they do not interfere with the principal use. Member Schmidt and Mayor Courtney stated they agreed with the recommendation. Member Bredesen -commented that he could not d' support unlimited number of..machines for the PC -2 zone and could see no benefit 0) to the City from the'expansion of this type of use. Member Richards stated he could not support the machines being allowed in PC -1 in -that .he .did not consider V it an accessory use In a neighborhood convenience center, that. he did feel they should be allowed in PC -2 but had no objection to unlimited number of machines m in'P.0 -3. Upon discussions Member Bredesen commented that his posture regarding Q methanical amusement machines would not preclude his voting in favor of the Comprehensive. Zoning Ordinance. Member Turner then moved that the draft of the Zoning Ordinance •provide.that mechanical amusement. devices be allowed as an accessory use•as.follows. Two machines in:PCTl:District and *unlimited number of .machines in the PC -2 and PC -3 District's for the reasons as stated previously. Motion was seconded by Member Schmidt.' Ayes: Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: Bredesen, Richards Motion carried. ' With regard to other issues-identified regarding rezoning of some vacant parcels presently zoned multiple districts, rezoning of Colonial Church of Edina, rezoning of properties at 76th and France Avenue presently zoned PID, and zoning of office buildings in the Southdale area, Member Richards suggested that owners of the subject..properties who have not responded to the notice of public hearing be contacted by letter asking them to submit•their comments before ok on February 6, 1984, so that the issues can be'discussed by- the Council. Member Richards then moved 'that the public hearing on. the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance be continued until February 6, 1984, that staff be instructed to contact the property owners specifically identified with regard to rezoning asking them to submit their comments by that. date. Motion. was seconded by.Member *Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RYLLO DEVELOPMENT REZONING REQUEST TO PRD -2 GRANTED FIRS' READING; PRELIMINARY PLA APPROVED FOR VERNON COURT ADDITION. Affidavit of Not was presented by Clerk, approved as to form an ordered placed on file. Mr. ghea presented the rezoning request of Ryllo Develop t for property generally Gated north of the Crosstown Highway and west of Vernon urt, advising that th subject property measures .82 acres in area and is zoned R- ingle Family Dwe ng.Distiict•..-.Across Vernon Court to the north of the proper is the propo d site of a recently approved five -unit townhouse project; to th' orthwest cross Vernon Avenue is the Habitat, which is zoned R -2 and an eight -unit hou development zoned PRD -3, and adjoining the property on the south is t osstown Highway. He advised that the proponent is requesting a rezoning to PRD armed Residential District. A pre- liminary development plan has been submi ad w . h illustrates a five -unit town- house building. The townhouses would b orieate ward Vernon Avenue and access would be served by a private drive fro Vernon Court. Two enclosed parking spaces are proposed for each unit, two expos d parking spaces front of each garage plus a separate five car parking are are also provided. noted that elevation drawings have been submitted showi two -story units with t under garages at the rear of each unit. The site includes two, small, City -owned parcels which are residue from the City's acquisition of the right of way for Vernon Court and the proponent ins suggesting that the City deed those small parcels to him to include in the site plan. The proposed zoning conforms with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site and conforms with the Zoning Ordinance requirements with the exception of the proposed setbacks of units 1 and 5. The site plan pro- poses 30 foot setbacks rather than 35 feet as required. Mr. Hughes explained Aa6 1/16/84 186 that the property suffers from its close proximity to the Crosstown Highway and the ramp to County Road 18. The project appears to be designed with that fact in mind and the proponent has attempted to reduce this exposure through building design, orientation, and berming. At the December 28, 1983, meeting the Community Development and Planning Commission recommended preliminary approval of the rezoning to PRD -2 and Vernon Court Addition plat subject to the following: 1)'acceptable overall development plans, 2) final platting, and 3) subdivision dedication, and 4) the conveyance of the residual right of way parcels from the City. Mr. Hughes advised that Howard Kyllo, the proponent, was present to answer any questions. In response to question of Anne Bieter, 6103 Habitat Court, regard- ing landscaping Mr. Hughes advised that landscaping plans would be submitted for approval before the final plat was approved. No further comments being heard, Member Richards offered Ordinance No. 811 -A177 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A177 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY'ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PRD -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 4 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is enlarged by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Residential District (Sub- District PRD -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision Number 196, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the East 16.5.feet from the most Easterly boundary of said Lot measured at right angles to the said Easterly boundary and except the North 16.5 feet of said Lot measured at right angles to the North line of said Lot and except that part of said Lot which lies Southwesterly of the following described Line 1 and Northeasterly, Northerly and Northwesterly of a line parallel with and 40 feet Southwesterly, Southerly and Southeast- erly of the following described Line 2 and measured at right angles thereto: Line 1: Beginning at the East 1/4 corner of Section 6, Township 116, Range 21 thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 27 seconds East along the East line of said Section 6 a'distance of 1807.59 feet; thence North 78 degrees 48 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 1070.37 feet; thence North 81 degrees 13 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 3402.95 feet to a point hereby designated as "Point A" thence North 08 degrees 46 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 240 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line l; thence South 81 degrees 13 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 600 feet and there terminating. Line 2: Beginning at the aforedesigaated "Point A "; thence'South 81 degrees 13 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 552.95 feet; thence South 08 degrees 46 minutes 27 seconds West a distance of 135 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line 2; thence North 81 degrees 13 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 223.93 feet; thence along a 10 degree curve.to the left (delta angle 60 degrees 03 minutes 23 seconds tangent distance 331.17 feet) a distance of 600.56 feet and there terminating. according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the "'-•gister of Deeds in and for said County. The boundaries of the premises are marked by Judicial Landmarks Numbered 1 to 7 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 12505 as shown on the plat of the Survey on file in Torrens Case No. 12605. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Member Richards then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: f RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT JI FOR VERNON COURT ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Vernon Court Addition ", platted by Kyllo Development, Inc. and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of January 16, 1984, be and is hereby. granted, preliminnary. plat, approval..., . Motion.for:adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING CONTINUED ON WOODDALE SCHOOL PROPERTY AND REZONING REQUEST TO HERITAGE PRESERVATION DISTRICT. Mayor Courtney recalled that the hearing on the Wooddale School Property and the request of the Heritage Preservation Board for rezoning of Wooddale School to Heritage Preservation District had been continued from the meeting of December 19, 1983, to provide time for Council Members to reflect on all the facts and comments heard and to negotiate with the School Board the basis upon which the City would take the property if that decision is eventually made. Member Turner then reviewed the events regarding the Wooddale School issue. It was initiated by resolution of the School District to convey the Wooddale School property to the City of Edina to be kept in public ownership and retaining revision- Ail r 192 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 6, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. FLAG CEREMONY CONDUCTED BY GIRL SCOUT TROOP NO. 615. Members of Girl Scout Troop No. 615 opened the meeting by presenting the colors andge of Allegiance. .The Mayor and Council Members welcomed them and thanked them r the samples from the. Annual Scout Cookie*Vale. WOMEN . Mayor Courtney read WHEREAS, the Minnesota Jay Women have promot for 34 years; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Jaycee an is an orga of today in over 275 communities; d WHEREAS, the Minnesota Jaycee Women all s to educate the community.in the areas got to Retarded Citizens, Community Service, edic Imperfecta and Today's Women; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Jaycee Women p de leaders; and EAS WEER, THEIR CREED STATES, "May w leave Ithe lived and served within it "; following proclamation: pity service in Minnesota of over 5,000 young women aside the week of February 12 through 18 ng projects is Accent on Youth, Aid al Health, Epilepsy, Osteogenesis NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED t the week of claimed JAYCEE WOMEN WEEK. development to tomorrow's a better place because we 12 thru 18,,1984, be pro- GORDON "BUD" COLEMAN AND GORDOO RUDOLPH COMMENDED. Assistant City Manager Bernhardson introduced Gordon "Bud" Cole and Gordon Rudolph, advising that both men are light equipment operators with th Public Works Department and have been employed'with the City since 1969 and 1962, spectively. He commended them for their faithful and conscientious service to t e City of Edina and presented them with .silver pens bearing the Edina Logo. The Coua 1 Members joined in congratulating and thanking them. MINUTES of the Regular Council Meeting of January 16, 1984, and Special Meeting of ' January 23, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE GRANTED FIRST READING /PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD OPEN TO FEBRUARY 27, 1984. Planner Hughes recalled that the public bearing on the Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance conducted at the lass. meeting had been continued to receive additional oral-or written comment and he suggested that the hearing be held open to February 27 for any further comment from property owners. Mr. Hughes then reviewed rezoning issues that were pointed out at the previous meeting as follows: 1) Vacant property presently zoned multiple residence - three properties are.involved, one at the junction of 7th Street and Co...Rd. 18, another directly south of Interlachen Hills apartments and the third parcel is located just west of Cahill Road. Staff would propose that those properties which are zoned either R -3 District or R -4 District under the present ordinance be rezoned to R -1 District in connection with this process. 2) Some properties that are zoned Planned-Industrial District (PID)'now are proposed to be rezoned to Planned Office District (POD): Those properties include .areas off: Pentagon Office Park, the Edina Office Center building, and the Xerox Building. Because.they are developed with office buildings it.is proposed they be rezoned to POD. 3) Some prop- erties in the Southdale area presently zoned Commercial District are developed with office buildings and would be better zoned POD. They are the Southdale Office Center . and the Titus Building. 'Mr. Hughes recalled that at the last meeting the Council had requested that staff notify the owners of those properties to solicit their comments. It was found that many of the buildings are owned by companies that are located out of state. Staff has contacted the management companies for those properties and all have indicated they see no particular problem with the proposed rezoning, but would have to consult with the owners. Because of the distances involved, Mr. Hughes sug- gested that the whole issue be deferred until February 27 for solicitation of comments from the building owners, noting that no one had objected to date. 4) Developed resi- dential properties which are presently zoned R -3 District, R -4 District and R -5 District and have to be put into some catagory under the new zoning ordinance. Mr. Hughes explained that the policy followed in preparing the new zoning map is to rezone those . properties to the highest density PRD use permitted by the Comprehensive Plan, but only to the degree of density to prevent any non - conforming status for.each site. He noted that there are some developed properties in the City that will be non - conforming by virture of the adoption of the new zoning ordinance due to their density exceeding even the highest zone that is proposed. Mr. Hughes then pointed out the second general At 2/6/84 193 issue which relates to some changes in the text of the draft ordinance. As comments were received from property owners through the hearing process, there are a variety of changes that became obvious and those prompted staff review of other aspects of the proposed ordinance. He suggested that for the continued hearing on February 27 that staff prepare a comprehensive listing of all the minor and major changes to the draft of the ordinance for Council's consideration. Noted was a concern expressed by Dr. Ralph Lieber, Superintendent of Schools, relative to the Community Center. Mr. Hughes advised that a minor redraft would address that concern and suggested that the Community-Center should be considered an allowed conditional use rather than an interim use. It therefore would be exempt from the 7 -year sunset provision of the interim use. The only catagories then that would be subject to the 7 -year provision would be schools for teaching music, dance, etc. which are typically in the commercial district and administrative offices for non- profit organizations. Other uses such as public schools, churches, civic institutions and community centers would be considered an allowed conditional use and could continue to exist until they are expanded in some fashion. Following Mr. Hughes' presentation, Mayor Courtney called for comments from the public. Wayne Vandervort stated he represents Wallace Kenneth who is the owner of two parcels of land in Edina which are undeve- loped, one tract on Vernon Avenue and a 15 -acre tract on Lincoln Drive, and that Mr. Kenneth is opposed to the rezoning suggested with respect to the Lincoln Drive property. Mr. Kenneth is requesting that the property remain zoned as it presently V• is so that he can proceed to develop that property for apartment complexes. Mr. Van- dervort stated further that because of the urgency of this matter he has asked Mr. Kenneth to prepare construction plans and submit them to the Planning Department this week so that he will not be denied any of his rights if the proposed zoning V ordinance is adopted. He stated that, for some type of orderly planning for mMr. Kenneth's land on Lincoln Drive, the adoption of the zoning ordinance should a be delayed so that they could work with the planning Department and the Council to agree on some type of sensible planning for that tract of land. With respect to . the Vernon Avenue property, Mr. Vandervort explained that this property abuts two existing apartment complexes and it.would seem logical that the City should consider upgrading that zoning from R -1 District to R -5 District because it will be the intention of Mr. Kenneth in the foreseeable future to build an apartment complex there.comparable to those abutting properties, one of which has a density of around 23 -24 units per acre and the other around 18 units per acre. In response to a question of Mayor Courtney regarding First Reading of the ordinance; Attorney Erickson stated that there is statutory authority to protect the planning process by imposing a moratorium which the Council already has done relative to R -1 District properties except for single family homes. Because Mr. Kenneth has filed or will file for a building permit, it is recommended that the Council consider adopting a similar moratorium on construction of multiple dwelling units at the Special Meeting on February 13. Member Turner stated she would support a moratorium, that the Council has spent 6 to 8 months in reviewing the zoning ordinance to prepare a document that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and that the process should be protected. Mr. Vandervort commented that if a moratorium is passed it leaves no alternatives for Mr. Kenneth. Mr. Erickson responded that the moratorium would not prevent the continuation of discussions with Mr. Kenneth regarding his properties. Harvey Hansen stated he represents Carl Hansen who is the owner of undeveloped property proposed to be rezoned and that he would like to go on record that they are not in favor of the proposal. Mr. Hansen asked why this is being done and noted that two of the three undeveloped parcels are in the extreme northwestern corner of Edina, pay taxes to tb:e City of Edina but Hopkins School District taxes and have-little if any impact upon what goes on•in the City of Edina as they are much more Hopkins oriented properties. In response, Mr. Hughes stated that the basic goal in the proposed zoning ordinance is to provide an ordinance that conforms with the Comprehensive Plan. In the process that the Community Development and Planning Commission and the Council worked through during the last 9 years and end- ing in the Comprehensive Plan, there has been an attempt to reduce the density allowed for those types of developments. Now the City is getting to the point of recodifying its ordinances and is looking at some of these properties that were previously zoned to what Council believes are unacceptable densities. There being only three properties in the City that were zoned that way, and as they were rela- tively old zonings, it was staff's judgement that it was beat now to rezone them ,back to R -1 District and then encourage their subsequent rezoning to a new district that would fit in both with the new zoning ordinance as well as the Comprehensive Plan. Marsh Everson, 6000 Fox Meadow Lane, stated that he too objects to the pro- posed rezoning for property he owns. He added that he wishes to keep the current zoning for his property. Member Turner observed that one issue that has not been discussed nor identified is that in the proposed zoning ordinance we are maintain- ing a couple of standards for the R -1 District that are important; namely the minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet and 25% lot coverage as measures of density. By that the Council is saying we like the open space and the size of the lots we have in Edina and are by a conscious decision maintaining those standards. No further comment being heard, Member Turner offered the Comprehensive Zoning Ordi- nance for First Reading, in the form attached to these Minutes as Exhibit A and Aa1 2/6/84 194 hereby made a part of these minutes, with the understanding that the public hearing be continued to February 27, 1984, that any oral and written comments concerning the ordinance may be submitted for consideration through the February 27 hearing, and that staff be directed to prepare Findings of Fact and Reasons for the adoption of the Comprehensive ion was seconded Ordinance Member for review and action by the Council on February RoUcall c Ayes: Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ORDINANCE N0, 811 -A178 FOR REZONING TO POD -1 (HEDBEAG a :viva a.vraciaaai -• -- - -- -- READING• PRELIMINARY PLAT O=oHEDB Gt fAformWNnd ordered pllaacced on file. Mr. Notice was presented by Clerk, app P lot of Hedberg and Sons Company recalled that the rezoning request and prelim inary P involves a iSas':beard by the Council at locatedeeaet•of FranceeAvenue andenortheof Parklawa Avenue 7.1 acre parcel of property extended. At the November lat meeting the _ one month o cons dernthe aspectsrofgthistproject. ng request and preliminary P The property owner since that time has requested continuation of the hearing. Mr. Hughes stated that the issue before the Council is the rezoning been fsthe property to POD-1 Planned Office District and that A preliminary office building for the property support of that zoning. It illustrates a four -story Which measures approximately 90,000 square feet in area. According to the preliminary plans a drive- through banking facility would also be provided on the northwesterly portion of the site. At the Council Meeting on November 7 staff had pointed out that part of the consideration of this rezoning was a dedication by Hedberg and Sons Com- pany of park property in order to satisfy the parkland dedication requirement for this parcel as well as for all their property in southeast Edina which comprises about 95 acres of land. Mr. Hughes advised that the Community Development and Planning Commission has held a public hearing concerning an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to show a new location for the park in the southeastern portion of the City and that the Commission would recommend that the Plan be amended. The Plan shows the r park located south of Parklawn Avenue and as now proposed, the park would be sited north of Parklawn Avenue with a green strip which would be connected down eventually to the Winfield /Laukka property as well as northerly to intercept the existing green strip that was dedicated in connection with the Yorktown plat: Secondly., ' betwen the City November 7, 1983 meeting it was noted th oddofcdedication a Those discussions have and the property owner regarding the been held and Hedberg and Sons Company have now toaatwo to dedicate at the lead mlocated north of r Parklawn a Avenue immediately, of the remaining gravel deposits. Regarding the rights for this area to allow mining strip located south of Parklawn Avenue, it was previously the desire rmin of method a gs to convey that to the City at some predetermined th�n future. Hedbergs have now agreed to arriving at that price at some point dedicate that land to the City at no cost; however, it is their desire that that dedication occur at some point in the future, perhaps as far out as 8 or 10 years, due to.the large amounts of gravel deposits located be 76th Street and lawa. 7500 York Avenue Mr. Hughes advised that there is a very steep bankment between and the Hedberg property. It would be nearly impossible to mine out thatdstriphe without mining out the balance of the property, understanding with such a dedication is that the City would then at the same time f Hedberg Court and Parklawn A °• assume its normal policy for paying for the cost o which is that the City would pay the normal front foot rate for Parklawn Avenue and a one -third side rate for Hedberg Court. 6en0the 00 price the that construction was previously estimated it was approximately $ for that work. Mr. Hughes indicated that the action requested is preliminary rezoning approval to POD-1 Planned Office District for the 7.1 acre parcel of property in the northeast corner of Parklawn and France Avenue, as well as preli- minary plat approval. Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan is needed to show the new park location for southeast Edina. With regard to the rezoning and subdivision, staff would recommend it be approved subject to these conditions: 1) a developer's agreement be executed that would cover the methods for the improvement of Parklawn Avenue and Hedberg Court, 2) that there be a park dedication agr of overall final plat, overall development plan for the office building, 5) a temporary cul de sac shown On Parklawn Avenue until ithisPextenIed through the property, and 6) a temporary ark plan Mr. Hughes advised that since the November 7, 1983 meeting a preliminary P P has been prepared by the firm of BRW which has been reviewed only briefly by the Park Board and that they would like additional time to study the programming of the park and the specific plan proposed. The issue involved would be to determine if the City's storm water ponding needs could be satisfied on a park of that size and still have enough room left over for open spaces uses. BRW has develop d' plan whereby a large area will be inundated during the 100 -year frequency but under normal conditions it will be open and available for various outdoor activities. An arboretum concept is planned for the southerly part of the park h3-b e o REQUEST TO REJECT BIDS TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST TO REJECT BIDS FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK BATHROOM ADDITION DATE: July 7, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. A_ ITEM DESCRIPTION: EDINBOROUGH PARK BATHROOM ADDITION. Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Reject all bids Option B $93,736.00 $96,000.00 $97,500.00 $98,682.00 $111,191.00 $116,500.00 $134,970.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: On Wednesday, June 17, 2009, the City of Edina opened sealed bids for development of bathroom additions (converting the catering kitchen to bathrooms) for Edinborough Park. This 2009 Capital Improvement Plan project is budgeted at $60,000 (total project costs, including engineering/architect fees). Specifications called for an alternate bid (Option B) that included a lesser quality floor and wall tile for cost savings. Even with the lesser quality tile, the lowest bid is considerably over budget. It is the consulting engineer's opinion (Burt Coffin of ESG Architects) that bids came in significantly higher than he anticipated. Even though this is a very high priority CIP project for Edinborough Park, it is staff's recommendation to reject all bids and meet-with some of the vendors who submitted bids in hopes to find options in design and specifications that could reduce the scope of the project to bring it within budget. If enough savings can be engineered into the project, we may re -bid the project again this year. If not, then staff proposes to make this a 2010 CIP project and re- prioritize some other future CEP projects competing for the same funding source. Staff proposes to reject all bids. -Page 1 of 2- Option A 1. Greystone Construction Company 1. $98,488.00 2. EFH Company, Inc 2. $101,000.00 3. CM Construction Company, Inc. 3. $102,000.00 4. Hunerberg Construction Company 4. $104,280.00 5. DNR Construction Services, Inc. 5. $114,891.00 6. Joseph Companies 6. $121,000.00 7. JLC Commercial & Industrial Construction 7. $139,000.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Reject all bids Option B $93,736.00 $96,000.00 $97,500.00 $98,682.00 $111,191.00 $116,500.00 $134,970.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: On Wednesday, June 17, 2009, the City of Edina opened sealed bids for development of bathroom additions (converting the catering kitchen to bathrooms) for Edinborough Park. This 2009 Capital Improvement Plan project is budgeted at $60,000 (total project costs, including engineering/architect fees). Specifications called for an alternate bid (Option B) that included a lesser quality floor and wall tile for cost savings. Even with the lesser quality tile, the lowest bid is considerably over budget. It is the consulting engineer's opinion (Burt Coffin of ESG Architects) that bids came in significantly higher than he anticipated. Even though this is a very high priority CIP project for Edinborough Park, it is staff's recommendation to reject all bids and meet-with some of the vendors who submitted bids in hopes to find options in design and specifications that could reduce the scope of the project to bring it within budget. If enough savings can be engineered into the project, we may re -bid the project again this year. If not, then staff proposes to make this a 2010 CIP project and re- prioritize some other future CEP projects competing for the same funding source. Staff proposes to reject all bids. -Page 1 of 2- Edina Park and Recreation John Ke_prXs, Director Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget Wallis, Fin ct -Page 2 of 2- Director HughU, CAX\Manager TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: July 7, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Asbestos & Hazardous Building Material Removal, 7450 Metro Boulevard Contract No. 1, 1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED July 1. 2009 Company 1. Dennis Environmental Operations 2. Twell Environmental, Inc. 3. JC Environmental and Demolition, Inc. 4. VCI Environmental, Inc. 5. EnviroBate 6. Mavo Systems 7. Environmental Plant Services RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Dennis Environmental Operations No. PW -1 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE st 30, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 73,792.00 $ 77,177.00 $ 88,800.00 $ 94,350.00 $ 108,300.00 $ 146,353.00 $ 191,883.00 $73,792.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the asbestos and hazardous building material to be removed from the new Public Works Facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. These items along with the responsibility for removal were identified prior to purchasing the property from Con Agra. These materials need to be removed prior to commencement of the demolition contract. The City's consultant for this work, Braun Intertec Corp, has reviewed the bids and feels that Dennis Environmental Operations is a qualified bidder for this project. The project estimate was $126,000. Staff recommends awarding this project to Dennis Environmental Operations. gnature The Recommended Bid is within budget _ Public Works epart ent not within budget hn Wallin, Finance Director 16?7*47Z1 Gordon Hughes, City Manag-' r G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 1 Asbestos Removal\Contract No. 1 RFP.doc r otte REQUEST .FOR PURCHASE ,aaa TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: July 7, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Selective Demolition & Partial Structural Steel, Edina Public Works Building, 7450 Metro Boulevard Contract No. 2, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE July 1, 2009 Company 1. Blue Earth Environmental Co. Inc. 2. Lloyd's Construction Services, Inc. 3. Carl. Bolander & Sons Co. 4. Rachel Contracting, LLC 5. Veit & Company, Inc. 6. Landwehr Construction, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Blue Earth Environment Co. Inc. August 30, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 362,000.00 $ 497,500.00 $ 522,953.00 $ 645,800.00 $ 650,419.00 $ 967,385.00 $362,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the selective demolition and partial structural steel for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The project includes the removal of the interior of the building including the concrete floor in the warehouse area. The bid documents included salvaging for reuse, on the site, all of the concrete from the facility. I have included a memo from our lead Architect — Jeff Oertel regarding the sustainable measures that we are following for the reconstruction of this facility. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Blue Earth Environment Co. Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $431,573. Staff recommends awarding this project to Blue Earth Environment Co. Inc. Siaryature The Recommended Bid is Public Works Depart ent within bu get not within budget J n Wallin, Finance Director Gordon Hughes, City Mats ger G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 2 Bldg DemoUsc \Contract No. 2 RFP.doc OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 SAINT CLAIR AVENUE, SAINT PAUL, MN 55105 TEL: 651/696 -5186 FAX: 651/696-5188 DATE: July 1, 2009 TO: Wayne Houle, City of Edina Public Works Director FROM: Jeff Oertel RE: City of Edina Public Works project Sustainable design features The following sustainable or "green" architecture items are being incorporated into the project: Waste management of materials during construction Reuse of the majority of the existing building Innovative and improved storm water techniques and design Use of water - efficient landscaping on site Use of automatic controls and loops at the overhead doors to conserve energy Additional insulation at the roof and exterior walls Daylighting techniques in numerous locations throughout the building Extensive use of lighting sensors to active and shut of artificial lighting Extensive lighting controls and light levels Incorporation of high - efficiency fluorescent lighting HVAC controls to reduce energy usage Set -back thermostats Radiant heat system to heat objects in the vehicle areas to help conserve energy Use of economizers in HVAC system Use of VFD (variable frequency drive) motors to conserve energy and motor life Use of low- emittance and VOC compliant materials Use of locally manufactured materials to the extent possible Energy efficient shades Low -E glazing Tinted glass to reduce heat infiltration Geo- thermal heat system in the office and mechanic's areas Energy recovery units in the vehicle areas Given"the inclusion of the above of the features and items in the scope of work, this project would be LEED certified if that certification were pursued. Examples of products with recycled materials: 25% fly ash for site concrete, concrete floors and walls 100% of local stone aggregate used in concrete walls panels Recycled steel and aluminum in the steel, decking and storefront Recycled pavement in lieu of limestone for base of pavement Green certified wood materials from sustainable forests Recycled products in millwork Recycled products in flooring Recycled paint Examples of locally made and manufactured products: Ready -mix concrete Precast concrete wall panels Precast plank Concrete block Millwork and wood products Glass o/ie REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: July 7, 2009 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Blake Road Mill and Overlay Contract No. ENG 09 -03; DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED July 1, 2009 Company 1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc 2. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 3. Hardrives, Inc. 4. Wm. Muelller & Sons, Inc 5. Midwest Asphalt Corp. 6. Valley Paving, Inc. 7. ASTECH Corp. 8. C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM IIIM Nos. BA -363 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE August 31, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 262,409.00 $ 281, 318.85 $ 287,645.05 $ 294,332.75 $ 295,298.50 $ 299,754.12 $ 316,062.20 $ 328,258.80 $ 262,409.00 This project consists of milling and overlaying the pavement on Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to Interlachen Boulevard. This project will be funded by state aid gas tax funds. The engineer's project estimate was $372,369.00. Staff recommends awarding the project to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. ro. 111101AR-OlIffir Agnature The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works — Engineering Depa ent not within budget J n Wallin, Finance Director Gordon Hughes, City M6fiager GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2009 \ENG 09 -3 2009 Mill and OverlayWDMIN\MISC\ENG 09 -03 RFP.doc TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 July 7, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Water Main Cleaning and Lining along Xerxes Avenue, Improvement No. W M -496 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 2009 Company 1. City of Minneapolis RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: City of Minneapolis BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE Amount of Quote or Bid $ 68,377.00 $68,377.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project for the relining of the water main along West 56th Street and West 58th Street from York Avenue to Xerxes Avenue and along Xerxes Avenue from West 58th Street to West 56th Street. As you will recall the residents of this area brought the red water issue to the City's attention last fall. This project will help eliminate this issue. The City of Minneapolis bids out more than 60,000 lineal feet of pipe lining per year; this project will be added to this year's project and will take place in August or September. Staff will be quoting out the access pits and restoration required for this project. This project is part of the 2009 -2013 Capital Improvement Program.. Staff recommends awarding this project to City of Minneapolis. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works - Engineering Depa ment not within budget Ahn Wallin, Finan ll. (zl, � Gordon Hughes, City Manager ce Director G: \Engineering \Improvements \WM496 WM Cement Lining Xerxes from 56th to 58thWDMIN \MISC \WM -496 Xerxes Water Main Relining RFP.doc REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item N.A. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Action ® Motion Donations ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the. recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-60 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to Edina Art Center: Elizabeth Eisenbrey $100.00 Screenwriters Workshop Operating $50.00 Account - Edward Leshlse Julie C. Timm - Contributing Member $50.00 Adele Mehta - Rembrandt Paintings Donation to Edina Police Department: Target $500.00 Dated: July 7, 2009 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2009 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 f To: From: Date: Subject: Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. B Heather Worthington Consent M Assistant City Manager Information Only FI July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA F-1 To Council Cellular antenna lease for Pamela Park Action M Motion F] Resolution Ordinance F-1 Discussion In fall 2008, the City was approached by T- Mobile to replace an existing soccer field light pole at Pamela Park with a metal light pole, topped by a cellular antenna array. This is a similar installation to those that were installed in Highlands Park for T- Mobile in 2003, and again for Sprint- Nextel in 2007. The Council approved the lease in February; T- Mobile then requested minor changes after the document was signed. The company now has submitted final, signed documents to the City for approval, and they have been reviewed and recommended by the City Attorney for approval by the City Council. The plans for the installation have not changed. Two minor changes were made to the lease; 1) the length of renewals has been changed to five, five -year renewals; 2) the indemnity clause was altered slightly, yet still holds the City harmless from negligent action or breach of agreement on the part of the tenant. Info /Background: The ground equipment will be located in a wooded area, adjacent to the soccer field (see attached photo simulation). This site was reviewed by the Parks Department, and is the location they would prefer for the equipment so that they can still perform maintenance in that area. Taxes will be paid on the portion of the lease area, and calculated and invoiced by our Assessing Department. The fence which will screen the ground equipment is a six -foot high, wooden privacy fence. The light array will be replaced on the new pole by the cellular contractor. Parks staff has finalized the screening plan with T- Mobile; a revised landscaping plan is attached. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Council approve the lease agreement with T- Mobile for a co- located cellular antenna at Pamela Park. Construction will not commence until a building permit is issued, and the contractor meets all the plan requirements as approved by the Council. Attachments: • Revised lease • Revised landscaping plan I 1 SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is entered into this day of 2009, between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, with offices at 4801 W. 50 "' Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 ( "Landlord "), and T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 2001 Butterfield Road, Suite 1900, Downers Grove, IL 60515 ( "Tenant "). SECTION ONE Property, Premises and Construction Landlord owns property located at 5900 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 (the "Property ") in the City of Edina, described on Exhibit "A." The primary purpose of the Landlord's ownership of the Property is to operate and maintain a public park and ball field. Subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows: A. Upon execution and final approval of this Agreement by both parties, Tenant may construct on the Property, at Tenant's expense, a seventy-five (75') foot telecommunications monopole ( "Tower ") integrated into a light fixture in accordance with plans and location depicted on the Attached Exhibit "B ". The color and technical specifications for the monopole shall be subject to the written approval of the Landlord as outlined in Exhibit "C" Such construction shall include surveys, soil testing, engineering procedures and completion of federal, state and local government compliance requirements ("Compliance Requirements ") reasonably associated with the erection of a 75' foot monopole. Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in the completion and /or acquisition of all Compliance Requirements. I.13580v02Conlieienlial Page 1 6/3/2009 B. Landlord leases to 'tenant: ground space on Landlord's property and nonexclusive rights for utilities and ingress and egress to the monopole (such areas shall be referred to as the "Premises" and are depicted on attached Exhibit "13 "). SECTION TWO Use and Description of Equipment tJpon completion of construction of the monopole, the Premises shall be used by Tenant solely for the purpose of installing, maintaining, removing and operating radio communications facilities, including, without limitation, utility lines, transmission lines, electronic equipment, radio transmitting and receiving antennas, supporting equipment and structures thereto ( "Tenant Facilities "). The initial Tenant Facilities to be utilized in connection with such use is described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The design and color of the antennas, waveguide and other external equipment shall be subject to the Landlord's approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Tenant may make routine repairs, modifications, replacements, upgrades and alterations to the Tenant Facilities as Tenant deems appropriate. Tenant shall obtain Landlord's prior written approval (which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) before making any visible material upgrades, modifications, alterations or additions to the antenna, waveguide or other external equipment. Tenant agrees, at its expense, to clean and /or paint the Tenant's Facilities at Landlord's reasonable discretion. Prior to expanding the square footage of the Premises, Tenant shall first obtain Landlord's written consent. Tenant shall be subject to additional rent as reasonably determined by Landlord for placement of more than nine (9) antennas or for any additional lease ground space other than described in Exhibit "C ". The use of the Premises by "Tenant Under this Agreement shall at all times be in accordance with the Technical Minimum Site Standards as described on Exhibit "D ". Subject to the terms herein, 113580�,02Conlidential Page 2 6/3/2009 Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in obtaining, at Tenant's expense, all licenses and permits required for Tenant's use of the Premises (the "Governmental Approvals "). At any time prior to the Commencement Date as long as the foregoing activities do not interfere with Landlord's or a pre- existing tenant's use of the Property and provided seven (7) days advance written notice is sent to Landlord (such notice to include a description of the type of work to be performed), Landlord agrees to allow Tenant to perform, at Tenant's own expense, surveys, soil testing and other engineering procedures on, under, and over the Property necessary to determine that Tenant's use of the Premises will be compatible with Tenant's engineering specifications, system design and Governmental Approvals. Subject to Section Six, Tenant shall be allowed reasonable access to the Premises twenty- tour (24) hours a day, 365 days a year for the use of the Premises in compliance with this Agreement. SECTION THREE Term The initial term of this Agreement shall be one (1) - five (5) year term ( "Initial Term "), commencing on the "Commencement Date ". Tenant may commence this Agreement on any day on or before June 30, 2010 ( "Option ") upon delivering written notice to Landlord. If Tenant has not provided written notice to Landlord of the Commencement Date prior to June 30, 2010, this Agreement shall be null and void. Tenant shall pay Landlord one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) upon the full execution of this Agreement for this Option. Tenant shall have the right to extend this Agreement beyond the Initial Term for five (5) additional five (5) year terms ( "Renewal "Perm" or "Renewal "Perms "). Each Renewal Term shall be on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein except for the amount of rent, which shall be determined in accordance with 143580�.02Confidential Page 3 6/3/2000 Section Four below. `['his Agreement shall automatically renew unless 'Tenant notifies the Landlord in writing of its intention not to renew this Agreement at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of any Renewal Term. Landlord may notify the Tenant in writing of its intention not to renew this Agreement at least sixty (60) days prior to each Renewal Term, and such notice shall not be given prior to the expiration of the First Renewal Term. In such case, this Agreement shall be terminated effective on the date of the expiration of the Initial Term or a Renewal Term, as the case may be. SECTION FOUR Rent Prior to the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay to Landlord as rent, nine thousand six hundred dollars ($9,600.00) for the first year of the Initial Term. The annual rent thereafter shall increase by three percent (3 %) each year of the Initial Term or Renewal Terms and shall be payable in full on or before the anniversary date of the Commencement Date each year to Landlord during the Initial Term or Renewal Term, as applicable. Rent not paid and received by Landlord when due shall be subject to a five percent (5 %) late fee and shall allow Landlord the option to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice from Landlord to Tenant that Tenant does not cure the default in such thirty (30) day period. Rent for any fractional month at the beginning or at the end of the Term or Renewal "Term shall be prorated. Landlord, its successors, assigns and /or designee, if any, will submit to Tenant any documents required by Tenant in connection with the payment of rent, including, without limitation, an IRS Form W -9. 1435 8002Conlidential Page 4 6/3/2009 SECTION FIVE Interference Landlord shall not permit its lessees, invitees or agents to use any portion of the Property in any way which materially interferes with the operations of Tenant. Such interference shall be deemed a material breach by Landlord, and Landlord shall have the responsibility to correct said interference. It shall be the obligation of Tenant not to cause interference to other tenants occupying the other portions of the Property as of the Commencement Date. In the event the Landlord, Tenant or any other tenant of Landlord experiences frequency interference, Landlord shall notify each tenant of such interference (including Tenant), and will work with all tenants to resolve the interference. All parties involved in the frequency interference shall, at their own expense, engage the services of a communications engineering firm to conduct frequency interference analyses. If the suspected interference cannot be resolved by the parties involved in such interference after consultation with their respective engineers, then the respective engineers shall select an engineering firm to act as a final mediator to resolve the frequency interference. The parties shall comply with the mediator's findings. Priority shall be given to the tenant with the longest tenure at the Property. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference may cause irreparable injury and, therefore, the injured party shall have the right, in addition to any other rights that it may have at law or in equity, to bring a court action to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) clays' prior written notice to the other party. 1.13580v02 Con 1idential Pau 5 6/3/2009 SECTION SIX Improvement; Utilities; Access Tenant shall have the right, at T'enant's expense, to erect and maintain on the Premises the equipment listed on Exhibit "C ". Tenant shall not erect and maintain any additional items or equipment on the Premises that would change the aesthetics of the Property without the prior written consent of the Landlord, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. Tenant shall have the right at its expense and Landlord's approval to install, approved utilities on the Premises and Property in order to operate the facilities described in this Agreement. Landlord agrees to grant an easement to install such utilities either to Tenant or to the public utility, for the benefit of Tenant, at no cost to Tenant. Tenant shall at its own expense arrange for separate metering of utility services that must be read from outside the surrounding fence. Tenant shall at its own expense arrange for the relocation of any utilities. Tenant shall pay for all utility services it consumes in its operations. Tenant shall restore or replace all landscaping and vegetation that has been disturbed during construction, to its condition as of the Commencement Date within sixty (60) days of completion of construction. The landscaping and vegetation shall be warranted live and healthy for a period of twelve (12) months after any such landscaping and vegetation has been restored or replaced. Tenant shall also provide Landlord a cash payment of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) prior to beginning construction of Tenant's Facilities in lieu of "Tenant planting additional trees on the Property. Id3580 02Confidential Page 6 /3/2000 SECTION SEVEN Termination This Agreement may be terminated upon thirty (30) days written notice from Landlord to Tenant in the event rent is not paid by Tenant on or before the anniversary date of Commencement Date of each year during; the Term or Renewal Term, as applicable, provided, however that if Tenant cures the unpaid rent default within such thirty (30) day period, Landlord shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be terminated, without any penalty or further liability, following ninety (90) days written notice as follows: (1) by either party upon a material default of any covenant or term hereof (except for the payment of rent) by the other party, which default is not cured within ninety (90) days of receipt of written notice of default unless such default may not reasonably be cured within a ninety (90) day period, in which case, this Agreement may not be terminated if the defaulting party commences action to cure the default with such ninety (90) day period and proceeds with due diligence to fully cure the default and thereafter cures the default (without, however, limiting any other rights available to the parties at law, in equity, or pursuant to any other provisions hereof); (2) by "Tenant if it is unable to obtain or maintain any license, permit, or other governmental agency approval necessary to the construction and /or operation of the Tenant Facilities or Tenant's business (3) by Tenant if the Premises are or become unacceptable under the Tenant's design or engineering specifications for the communication system network to which the facilities belong; (4) by Landlord after the expiration of the Second Renewal Term if the City council votes to redevelop the Property and such redevelopment is incompatible with 'ferlant's permitted use hereunder. Id3580 02Ccmlidemial Page 7 6 /32009 0 If this Agreement is terminated, rent shall be prorated as of the date of termination, and. in the event of termination for any reason other than nonpayment of rent, all prepaid rents shal! �,e refunded to Tenant within ninety (90) days of said termination. Upon termination, Tenant shall remove the Tenant Facilities at Tenant's cost and expense within sixty (60) days. SECTION EIGHT Taxes Tenant shall pay any personal property taxes assessed on, or any portion of such taxes attributable to, the Tenant Facilities. Landlord shall pay when due all real property taxes and all other fees and assessments attributable to the Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall pay any increase in real property taxes levied against the Premises for the period from the Commencement Date through to termination of this Agreement that is directly attributable to Tenant's use of the Premises. Landlord agrees to furnish proof of such increase to Tenant. If Landlord receives notice of any personal property or real property tax assessment against Landlord, which may affect Tenant and is directly attributable to Tenant's installation, Landlord shall provide timely notice of the assessment to Tenant sufficient to allow Tenant to consent to or challenge such assessment, whether in a Court, administrative proceeding, or other venue, on behalf of Landlord and /or Tenant. SECTION NINE Insurance Tenant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance insuring Tenant against liability for personal injury, death or damage to personal property arising out of use of the Premises by Tenant with combined single limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars I43580 02Conlidential Page 8 .6/3/2009 ($1,000,000.00). Tenant shall also maintain fire and extended coverage insurance insuring Tenant's personal property for its frill insurable value (subject to reasonable deductibles). Landlord shall maintain general liability insurance insuring against liability for personal injury, death or damage to personal property arising out of its ownership, use and management of the Premises by Landlord or its agents, with combined single limits of not less than the limits allowed by Minn. Stat. Section 466.01. Landlord shall maintain property and casualty insurance on all improvements to the Property including the Facilities. Tenant shall name Landlord as additional insured on its commercial general liability policy required to be maintained by Tenant hereunder. Each policy shall contain a provision notifying Landlord of intent to cancel thirty (30) days prior to such cancellation. Tenant shall complete the Landlord's Certificate of Insurance form attached hereto as Exhibit "F ". "Tenant shall provide Landlord with proof of workers' compensation insurance covering all of Tenant's employees and agents who access the Premises in accordance with state law. Tenant and Landlord shall have the right to self - insure with respect to any of the above insurance requirements. SECTION TEN Destruction of Premises If the Premises are destroyed or damaged so as to reasonably hinder the Tenant's effective use of the Premises, either Landlord or Tenant may elect to terminate this Agreement effective as of the date of the damage or destruction by notifying the other party not more than forty -five (45) days following the date of damage. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any rent prepaid by Tenant. Notwithstanding anything 1.1358002(:onfidenIial f'nge 9 6/3/3009 to the contrary herein, this Section 10 shall not require Landlord to rebuild or repair the Premises upon damage or destruction. if notice of termination is given, or if Landlord or Tenant undertake to rebuild the Premises and Tenant Facilities, Landlord agrees to use its reasonable efforts to permit Tenant to place temporary transmission and reception facilities on the Property at no additional rent until such time as Tenant is able to secure a replacement transmission location or the reconstruction of the Premises and Tenant Facilities is completed. SECTION ELEVEN Condemnation If a condemning authority, other than Landlord, takes all of the Property, or a portion sufficient, in the Tenant's determination, to render the Premises unsuitable for the use which Tenant was then making of the Premises, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date the title vests in the condemning authority. The parties shall be entitled to share in the condemnation proceeds in proportion to the values of their respective interest in the Premises. Sale of all or pant of the Premises to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of the power shall be treated as a taking by condemnation. SECTION TWELVE Notices All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested or by nationally recognized overnight courier to the addresses set forth below. Landlord or Tenant may from time to time designate any other address for their purposes by providing written notice to the other party. 143580 02Conlidential Page 10 6/3/2009 If to Landlord: City of Edina 4801 W. 5011i Street Edina, MN 55424 If to Tenant, to: T- Mobile USA, Inc. 12920 SE 3811i Street Bellevue, WA 98006 Attn: PCS Lease Administrator Attn: Legal Dept. And with a copy to: T- Mobile Central LLC 2001 Butterfield Rd., Suite 1900 Downers Grove, IL 60515 Attn: Lease Administration Manager Attn: Legal Dept. SECTION THIRTEEN Title and Quiet Enjoyment Landlord warrants that: (i) it has full right, power, and authority to execute this Agreement; (ii) it has good and unencumbered title to the Premises free and clear of any liens or mortgages; and (iii) Tenant, upon paying the rent, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. Landlord shall not cause or permit any use of the Property or the Premises that interferes with or impairs the quality of the communication services being rendered by Tenant from the Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant acknowledges that Landlord will need to perform maintenance activities on the Property including painting and repairs of the soccer light pole. Tenant agrees to cooperate with Landlord in order to allow such work to be completed in a timely and efficient manner as well as ensure continuous operation of the Tenant Facilities. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, "Fenant acknowledges that Landlord makes no warranties, express or implied with respect to: 1.13580v0 2Confiden ial Pagc 11 6/3/2009 i) Tenant's ability to expand its operations on the Premises beyond what is depicted oil the exhibits attached hereto. SECTION FOURTEEN Indemnity Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from, any and all costs (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses) and claims, actions, damages, obligation, liabilities and liens to the extent caused by (a) the breach of this Agreement by Tenant; and (b) the negligence or intentional acts /on the Property, or the Premises, by Tenant. This indemnity shall not apply to any claims, actions, damages, obligations, liabilities and liens arising from any negligent or intentional misconduct of Landlord and shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, both parties waive any claims that the other party may have against it with respect to consequential, incidental or special damages. SECTION FIFTEEN Assignment Tenant may not assign, or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interest in this Agreement or in the Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord; provided, however, that Tenant may assign its interest to its parent company, any subsidiary or affiliate of it or its parent company or to any successor -in- interest or entity acquiring fifty -one percent (51%) or more of its stock or assets, subject to any financing entity's interest, if any, in this Agreement as set forth in Section 18 below. Landlord may assign this Agreement upon written notice to Tenant, subject to the assignee assuming all of Landlord's obligations herein. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Tenant may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer without consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing 143580 02C'onlidential Page 12 6/3/2009 entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Tenant (i) has obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof. Upon an assignment by Tenant, Tenant shall be relieved of all liabilities and obligations hereunder and Landlord shall look solely to the assignee for future performance under this Agreement and all obligations hereunder. SECTION SIXTEEN Binding Effect: Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall run with the property. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, and assigns. SECTION SEVENTEN Waiver of Landlord's Lien Landlord waives any lien rights it may have concerning the Tenant Facilities which are deemed Tenant's personal property and not fixtures, and Tenant has the right to remove the same at any time without Landlord's consent. SECTION EIGHTEEN Miscellaneous The prevailing party in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, including appeals, if any. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations, and other agreements. "['here are no representations or 14-15XMY'onfidemial Page 13 6/3/2009 understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties. If either party is represented by a real estate broker in this transaction, that party shall be full responsible for any fee due such broker, and shall hold the other party harmless from an claims for commission by such broker. After the Commencement Date, Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in executing any documents (including a Memorandum of Lease attached hereto as Exhibit "P ") necessary to protect Tenant's rights hereunder or Tenant's use of the Premises. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of the Agreement, which shall continue in. full force and effect. Landlord and Tenant each agree to furnish to the other, within ten (10) business days after request, such truthful estoppel information as the other party may reasonably request. Tenant may obtain title insurance on its leasehold interest in the Property. In any case where the approval or consent of one party hereto is required, requested or otherwise to be given under this Agreement, such party shall not unreasonably delay or withhold its approval or consent. Id:3580v02COnlidential Page 14 6/3/2009 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation Lin James Hovland, Mayor TENANT: T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, a Delawa4.S.- e limited liability company By: __ Hossein Sepehr Its: Area Director, Engineering & Operations By: Debra Mangen, City Clerk Exhibit "A ": Description of the "Property" Exhibit "B ": Description of the "Premises" Exhibit "C ": Description of "Tenant Facilities" Exhibit "D" Technical Minimum Site Standards Exhibit "E ": Rent Exhibit "F" Certificate of Insurance form Exhibit "G" Memorandum of Lease THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651 -452 -5000 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2009, by James Hovland and by Debra Mangen, respectively, the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 143580ti.02C'onfi dent ial Page 15 6/3/2009 STATE OF ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this % r %,; ,day of , 2009, by Hossein Sepehr, the Area Director, Engineering & Operations of T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on its behalf. VERNA S GARRISON Notary Public - Minnesota Notary Public My Commission Expires January 31, 2013 14358002Confidential Page 16 6/3/2009 EXHIBIT "A" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The Property is described as follows: Property located in Hennepin, MN In the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, to wit: The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter except the East 133 feet thereof and except that part thereof platted as Boran's Edina Manor, Section 19, Township 28, Range 24. The North 275 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter except that part thereof platted as Boran's Edina Manor. Section 19, Township 28, Range 24. For public purposes. TORRENS Property AND BEING the same property conveyed to Village of Edina, a corporation from J. E. Boran Contractor & Builder, Inc., a corporation by Warranty Deed dated September 10, 1951 and recorded October 24, 1951 in Instrument No. 352712; AND FURTHER CONVEYED to Village of Edina, a corporation from J. E. Boran Contractor & Builder, Inc., a corporation by Limited Warranty Deed dated November 04, 1952 and recorded November 25, 1952 in Instrument No. 381731. Tax Parcel No. 19- 028 -24 -41 -0001 Common Address:5900 Park Place PID: 19- 028 -24 -41 -0001 1435WvWonIidential Page 17 6/3/2009 EXHIBIT "B" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES The Premises is depicted as follows: The following are attached: [Construction drawing to be attached once it's finalized] B -1 Vicinity Map, Site Plan, Enlarged Site: Plan B -2 Plans, Elevations, Sections, Details 1,13580vWonIidential Page 18 613/2000 EXHIBIT "C" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF TENANT FACILITIES [TO BE INSERTED ONCE FINA1..IZFD] 1435 R0%•02C'onlidential Page 19 6/3/2009 EXHIBIT " "D" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT TECHNICAL MINIMUM SITE STANDARDS 1. All equipment must be housed in an RF tight, metal enclosure that provides at least 60 db of attenuation to any internal RF signals. Desk -top base stations and open racks cannot be used without special approval; additional shielding kits may be required. 2. At least 60 db of isolation for 450 MHZ, 800 MHZ, 900 MHZ and 1800 — 2000 MHZ transmitters and 30 db of isolation for 150 MHZ and 40 MHZ transmitters must be provided; a harmonic filter must be provided on the transmitters between the antenna and any ferrite device used. Additional filtering and isolation may be required and will be considered on a case -by -case basis. Maximum transmitter power allowed into the antenna feed line will be 110 watts per transmitter. (Higher power levels will be considered on a case -by -case basis; additional protective devices may be required.) 4. Only jacketed copper Heliax cable will be permitted for transmission line at the site. All on -site intereabling must use RG /9, RG /142, RG /214 or '/2 inch Superflex. RG /8 or any other single shielded cable will not be allowed. 5. Proposed transmitters that will cause second order, third order or fifth order intermodulation products on existing receiver frequencies will not be permitted on the site. A receiver with the same frequency as an existing second order, third order or fifth order intermodulation product at the site, will not be permitted on the site. 6. All transmitters shall be equipped with band -pass cavities that will provide at least the following attenuation of side band noise, if needed: 40 MHA band: 50 db at 1 MHZ 150 MHZ band: 50 db at 1.5 MHZ 450 MHZ band: 50 db at 2.5 MlJZ 800/900 MHZ band: 50 db at 10 MHZ 1800/1900 MIIz Microwave PCS: 50 db at 20 MHZ Each cabinet must be identified by the owner's name, address and FCC station license; it also must have the name and telephone number of the responsible service agency. 8. Prior to approving any application for antenna space at the site, an engineering study will be conducted by the Engineer for the City of Edina, consisting of at least the following items: I d3580v02Con11denlia l . Page 20 6/3/2009 Intermodulation interference (IM) calculations of all transmitters and receivers known to exist in the area at time of application. (Study will include 2nd, 3rd and 5th order IM terms, and A + B — C, three - product terms.) "Transmitter noise and receiver desensing calculations of all equipment at the site. Analysis of best equipment and antenna locations at the site. /Analysis of AC power requirements. Report to prospective site user regarding application. 1435g002Conti den tial Page 21 6/3/2009 EXHIBIT "F" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE LIABILITY & WORKERS' COMPENSATION The Certificate of Insurance Liability & Workers' Compensation is attached. I435$0�.02Conlidcmial Page 22 6!3 /2009 DATE (F:N;`OD/ 1'rrr ACORD.. CERTIF IC'ATE OF LIABILITY INSI:RANCE 02'09,'2009 ERODA 1R T THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSCEn a4 A ]IA MIR (71' INI ORNIAI ION ONLY Seattle -.wk office J JL, DCONTERSNO RIGHTS UPON MECERTIFIC AlE HOLDER. IHIS 1•:20 Fifth Avenue C CERTIFICATE DOES NOT ANEEND. EXTEXD OR ALTER THE INSL- RERS.AFT'ORDINGCOCERt(•E N NAIC t fe0>'E f206 749 -4800 F.0 2UG 7.f0_,i8G0 I L]VSCRED _ _e.a Greenwich Insurance conpany 2 2,322 fEFF.3 SL Specialty Insurance Co 3 37865 12920 SE 38th Street ' 'lational Lni Orl Fire InS Co Of Pi[[51)urah 1 19445 COVEPLAGES SIR applies er terms and conditions of the nolicyl IF.E i:11I; - 7=?:.O't 1-:,:'.' 9F.5:; I55; cD 7 0Th: EI: :',1�E�::�� "!E],;P4':EFO?TEE F ?l:•:: :F:F:if�:7.T)ti ;-F.D :;oT';!'::: P•T.::�'1'G -F_ 1 OF. C < ?; J:':0:: f F :.::: -i <70: TF_�,% 1 -iF. 0—,• E.f C�< +:!" :E:: Rt : T:i FFiFE<- TO'.5'XF F. INS '< E ?.T:FI!: ATE ' Ll ", T,F.:i'•L: E) ?c F. L:E :. `[''_ C:o!'.•:.t :C "c :FF! ?i`�c:> 91 "'- :�7.:i, i c..', DE `: (: R:ii'c D i? =B i l': ii 51.31EC 1 'c7 .:L! T::E TEzXi ::C<! ': SI9: :5 .i.': J i 0:::1: Tla:: �.. riF i;'i E ; �iJC LS ACC• F. cC:; :tL:Cf.I'.iY.ir.t_;;,.Al'4A'. "E cc.:: Fi��iE�3'C F.'4 ?(:_ti1: 15 L10.17 _g-C:�:': .:RE =5 F.E`IJE•'c_• ?if T TAPE Of IYiI'Ra ?tF r rnLl(}�t lI6CR i iOLICI EFrE(Tlll T TOLICSEWIR.ITIOS L LRIIiS A G G Li1L L S S O Of '0:509 E E,y•f „-;': p, ?_`;,c I I1.00D,000 CAXA {.F iC ?.L>: TiL f f!,COO,CAO FEF.1S` :.aL �A�C :::A L1" 1 1 1,000,000 Ora s_g A4?t:•(:F- 1 1= .000,000 Il: A A AC T01:03ILE LL(EILIIS" o SOS y os in' ""05 Oi lV :!09....._ y I I1.rriU.000 is o ... V. G.SA QLLt31LIII . .1':74 G.:_ EAA{:rM�. C•: HEY. T{i >: 3A A:' AC C E EXCESS LIEBRELL4 L l 1 S S443136 0 05/7-11 '73 0 0",: Z., 01 ? ?A;.9 1 13 V10. 0 ©Y \:Ci- ❑ :_., -... 1:.57= A AGal:<•A:E 1 15.000.000 l .31E': 71 5:5.000 9 T 110P.f:[AS(OS; )F.�S.iiri�} 1�U X ' '- O Oi• O3 L • p p. X :1, -'• E.a:;(A:•_:uE':- = "_.•:;C :'.E tai1:;°4'i 2E 1 11. WO. OC-0 E :::�. ` `• s.: :?C ::a_F: :; �::Sa::7 E E: .1'. E,i''. E: ;L: ;'i :: ?.1: 1 11700.000 OIlim E E 7 1 - ..... F• ._? -t' Z:: LL - . 11.1 a Site Uwrber:• ALP0606B, Site �anH ?: PAM0A PArk, Si•te•Addre5s: '5900 Par). Place, Edina, r•v 5;:[4, ThO t:ertificate 5 Hnlder' is an -%dtlitiunal Ensured for (,enerA'l Liability Solaly as respect to operar.ions of the Hatred InSUrcCi At the e Above location if required by contract. _ _ 10ERTIMATE HOLDER CANCELLATION T city of Edina ° °•:::::,•' E: c:: f1 EE::. r: cE;^ pE ::LCE_etE�>EC- E:F- :7::•: a' ..- "r..]il: E. f.E r ?_:= :':A ":5'= y�'.n ✓lW�+wle.wr � rl,ou Ll N 199 ACORD . 1,1358OvO2C :onlidential Page 23 6/12009 EXHIBIT "G" to SITE LEASE AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF LEASE BETWEEN CITY OF EDINA ("LANDLORD") AND T- MOBILE CENTRAL LLC (`TENANT ") A Site Lease Agreement ( "Lease ") by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Landlord ") and T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "Tenant ") was made regarding the property described on the attached Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein for all purposes. The Lease is for a term of five (50) years and will commence on the date as set forth in the I.,ease (the "Commencement Date ") and shall terminate at midnight on the last day of the month in which the fifth (5t1i) anniversary of the Commencement Date shall have occurred. The I -ease shall automatically renew and extend for five (5) additional, five -year terms unless written notice is provided by Tenant tolandlord within sixty (60) days prior to one of the rive termination dates or as otherwise permitted in the Lease. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed this memorandum on the day of , 2009 (effective as of the date of the last party to sign). LANDLORD: City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: DO NOT EXECUTE Printed Name: Its: Mayor Date: By: DO NOT EXECUTE Printed Name: Its: City Clerk Date: 1.13580%.02ConfidenIial Page 24 6/212009 TLNANT: T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: DO NOT EXECUTE Hossein Sepehr Its: Area Director, Engineering and Operations Date: I,135go%02Conlidential Page 25 6,3/2009 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2009, by and , respectively, the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. (Use this space liar notary stain !seal) STATE OF ) SS. COUNTY OF Notary Public The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2009, by Hossein Sepehr, the Area Director, Engineering & Operations of T- Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Notary Public (tlse 11kis space 6) notary stain /seal) 1435$002Conlideniial Page 26 6 /3/2009 Exhibit "A" to Memorandum of Lease Legal Description of Property Flee Propery is legally described as follows: The Property is described as follows: Property located in Hennepin, MN In the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, to wit: The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter except the East 133 feet thereof and except that part thereof platted as Boran's Edina Manor, Section 19, Township 28, Range 24. The North 275 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter except that part thereof platted as Boran's Edina Manor, Section 19, Township 28, Range 24. For public purposes. TORRENS Property AND BEING the same property conveyed to Village of Edina. a corporation from J. E. Boran Contractor & Builder. Inc., a corporation by Warranty Deed dated September 10, 1951 and recorded October 24, 1951 in Instrument No. 352712, AND FURTHER CONVEYED to Village of Edina, a corporation from J. E. Boran Contractor & Builder. Inc., a corporation by Limited Warranty Deed dated November 04, 1952 and recorded November 25, 1952 in Instrument No. 381731. Tax Parcel No. 19- 028 -24 -41 -0001 Common Address: 5900 Park Place PID: 19- 028 -24 -41 -0001 14 3 58002Con idewial Page 27 6/3/2009 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA 8 i aa4 wa ® aan d e,r. PROJECT TEAM urmaa •.- ]r�]rsr 1Ya11iC Li -r'�M' �' m 1 293- iv m1GlC a aaa LM1 d 0a rr YR dO�B ®aa -aa] SITE DIRECTIONS a..l l®a11 ar, �¢ .9 � mu .a ,. ®m r. ,r wi'�"ira.w,m aor ,eal wob r�..]n]L6 an ram ,w a v° �� r ma, aml a w a�nsa..aii c wow a ue�io,r1°Oa � aas.c�"O�vn�mL du r ,m rtac Loco GOPHER STATE ONE CAL ax rLL feet , �p.a] -„r ABBREVIATIONS DRAWING INDEX wn,. waLar waoc d wane sac etyma r a.]w scam, .,n wrspcn,cl .,,vc. -n .....woes swwn, ro mm,� ,mo •wars, .....art w.. 4 aDaa, Uc � 'wt w.a, nar 4a .aLC ®N m m°woaie of raa.ac n.acr rrr .IM00 -Q ..... Oa.RID c1E RIN Ywr..,, ..... wmN.. gL.crr r0 rav Mrd .,w�rr], ..... 8ma . a[aiE] � �c teat wwws rscn r dew �./aP uvula -n ..... anm a arw .,,Oa -el ..... wAI i aYIOC IIAa m�i dr. DELL dr deR o,Y. L.rl1l m, Q/plr r dLW a.ar w,ar."d farYp �� - aarao v ] • Oa ] rNO,r Oina w1w aL me� ..a. L.ra s • m.rr r're nrsw �' a M wwaE� rawera wa - .a - ]aar art wsm. vaouoe i � - s - m�oc amrvoda a�mc oa @� M � maw=T aw,ro - n] - suro.o aa�.oL smmm srw - m � _ �m • mL aaaa ya ry�,nr v wm�® aaL �0o ®t• v n.rno _ a] (p - f],mr rvr pm., � eL aaa.oL awrc.m aoara Errr - (�l 0v�61wt�1p1'I vOSOaaO o W mrla, Wcokv� w. wwe i rim r .q n a°r'la - ,m (q - Eo,mw mL,wlna varum u N, EL,dla - eL (,7 - faaa ® {dp�ad, Yn1OE,� �m as rsr uao Lam .a,a onwr ]r9p� sL,�°or w1pO sa.rr - m (�1 - aroao mwala w.arar vasanae awmv - m f I � �aaaesw aL aE[L ]rcr. aw,E1,..L rc rr a aw ra.. v a wro — — — --- - n,rL T, 'r +a.r BE d �+ervr PAMELA EOOW1 A P0606 PROJECT INFO. & GENERAL NOTES 1 MNA. MN 55424 ■ I ar ra,r guar sty] aw i �+ A1P0606 -T7 5 -ro ro sw. wr -.s or a rota em nE r]., I .' pi I I �s s E' e e' i i� a t E .o® m•d srl m+-ra eaw/ a 4 a .o® T-.a14 mat r1E a/1vr ne, auv werl low.+. -W a anlolm aa.aort (lir. (>) leaaleq A m ® �\ ANTENNA LAYOUT tcae .+w ZeawT .om .n0.ln +wx m.a .o �� E wvnm m l,oa1 rl e'd TALL Cma foci L xa [Oa maavz foal¢ c. ea.ar W oAllacrm m eeTNL alalpt aaa elLL ap mu� Q,IF Gall M /aalO rf1Lx OaYlpi .O x -alw¢ Ono Y!♦I .e�1 O Amlem m/® �1 m SWL � �ma mAPA1L1aTQ. m mpp[ 811E rllaleAl OYeE �Ey ao+as ,. au/w nnc uiena wx eter aTel,r.0 s ®v ,xoe wro. 01e1A IEICn6 IlalFe nc Arrloawr .ao .r[ xm 4110®m s u>m me laa.o,m,. oa W 1R0 mulaB w �ID.w asE 101P11a Awlem w, e.n Aloe lOf:116 1 .1t .PrP.YALU aaea m S ma ®v +1eQ (aJ warm lai +K 4 rte a/3,1e1a rac am9 v meP (wno.. w+W allst v ieeu c o m aelu meuml aort 3 a,Ire4N/m.a l'ARO fxNL lrlll� GaM .ra Oa10lD a I+.a (» rang o mea a mlwes mr v meen 1naE as oo lenwruu so.alm m +�im°r a �eorl+o, e1L� ac aa0 lm ru maelm m c a m very me¢ts ran. a .rtalua we nal sa:1m a1.LL a se ®a rar Im nr Kd .Il.i. L a1U11\ @'Itb eWl a61S 911 wM wIC xMx tl itl.x a M m[ NA'L Y.a(IC Igllx N La Wr v TAl(.a11x. LNA RMIJOE 1EN15 Ilo. 111.; ,OCra ETel— v a maaas,m o a ame.a+m numP+m q e mlq m a+P . ma4ow+m uv imm 1. m+llxC'IW 6.LL R ALL TEL .IIIPMl V � U6 aGl O�nli Y +e[ R, AT f+R +YaIV. wl l,p Q .pa �+rwc,m m sm qs) .er0.r „o1.r aemwvc ra mew mrwwun. r110...o ml.lL Oa/ leaeomla axlo.r erre L• -+•d h ay.7 muL Oaa eo. INr e 1m nc Pewo xo qr em1 wanan .o .l lomv W r v M rra i He. aa fmalL l® a _ t +P um moazm+ IPm tea mA mt< I3 A a •+ +q ,K Am � +m• ,K Iralc Am ANTENNA INFO. & TOWER ELEVATION Ro' ,K ala AlD q Im' ,K 0014E m i Il sm Ilw� a1a 1,x1 e110, rt d 1af )K (.1 Am% g MINNEAPOLIS MARKET +m• )K ,uew e_ � B TAOIL 1 ,>p )K ea0 mwe R +m' )K mai \DEA+ � Ilm�+eaaa, q O R IID' )K (a) TWLe /+i�P w ,q )K M wue.Iav n +Ilm�te -m all v w w +m' )K q 1,0- a14�m1 1+P P ® Im' 1K d) aU.jOM, a Iq )K M eurNe) 141 lY[ afoe,ma ,OOI W 4a01AD alai m E91 ANTE O M FIECIUMIDIM n aW.. maP.a IM leer a ma oa M a (4419 xolr; u r�oaL O.la 4444 sxeL a Ar mu aeon ,,= r .emaa ec�l W t a6Wlm 4 I�P� � r >ll Wl -ip - i leaosm *- � � Pd LJ ApNr OeR napA+ l,aPrVL p11M 1011! eeQ e001aee xn 1a0u omonx� 14 Imar�mv roue W� .'�io��,lll�is � m. MM 4 M Ipm pip 0.{C ell e001aei mel W Ilp® +.+., e_ 6 A{pep maw Ali muua ala ' l�n w�.i�r � palal0 aQ� ------ -- __- _ ________ _______ _____ _ ____J a1 r+mc ,r. maw x441 aoP® l000c l� alm a we we v w r o mwam 141mmas rla,e I.o 1001°' 1p1A°'ep"°OQ ema ,m we�loe .�ea.wo�a 1a mu wa (sea sm la 1a r/e SOUTHEAST ELEVATION � Nw—a0 NEAST ELEVATION MM Al. CNMTN� ¢oat CGS fir. —tT J�lr es� Im Nalvar _e. .1.+0 m ROM .L3 1p1 TEL AD}m ee M1OVL. anwll ImP — .e 11 E. �s erre L• -+•d h ay.7 e 1m nc Pewo xo qr em1 wanan .o .l lomv W r v M rra i He. aa fmalL l® a _ t +P um r. PAMELA PARK Al P0608 I3 A a . ..M o ile 1 w . a P S v E-51"EM ANTENNA INFO. & TOWER ELEVATION 1e Ona mm a r ` i Il sm Ilw� a1a 1,x1 e110, rt d EDINA, YN 55424 g MINNEAPOLIS MARKET wA •�� e_ � B - -`� i p1P0606 Al s g 2 F B CCNTRACmR TO WALL TRANSFER ®q` i 5WRM . I I `ai V Di lPE a A b � mm wiT Ar.A11�Y ur�,n°p I I I I O ,E,Fn xa1C malY�Llpl .� // l�gAtj®Ra �arOmli• / Q� PPE) aaw a nc .aoc ae re anasAC / / ME ua�i Ema ILA I I �RaIIOL 0 I I AOlax 6 .Ii NYYL Tara V Ip YL uxawrt, m. Y mm a or Ipl 0 � I I I 00 00 oeooe00000 I I I D I cam TuwVLJ ' I I I I I I I I Lpl I: 'I Y molt m WIDOL G.Ip ue . Rll IDm I Vt'1pp1ll 110 DETAIL -jlJ z' � y AYI V"a I �QpO!�RA�OODF it amm Mo�a� �xa.rtm m AYM�FO T V0.�f4m�W�H mmpm� AOx¢ PwoAOm ar mn.¢ipa A � msa mo m ANA am An aal acm AM mm. u NA TAE RL@ AOM .7V4E . AAmm NOW On ffi OWWA 1 WYE AS ATalmm al M T aMobiler MINNEAPOLIS MARKET r xgAi AaR� (� L!1 CONCRETE SLAB caaw.7 .r aafA�x� .r. w.rrw. urrr.�r a AlaA I "/,.m PAMELA PARK - EDINA AIP0606 SECTIONS 8 DETAILS MNA, MN 55424 I I I I II ILA I I �RaIIOL , I I AOlax 6 .Ii NYYL Tara V Ip YL I. I I. I Ipl I I I I' b I I I I D I I I I I I I I Lpl I: 'I �H-FR.kME DETAIL -jlJ � msa mo m ANA am An aal acm AM mm. u NA TAE RL@ AOM .7V4E . AAmm NOW On ffi OWWA 1 WYE AS ATalmm al M T aMobiler MINNEAPOLIS MARKET r xgAi AaR� (� L!1 CONCRETE SLAB caaw.7 .r aafA�x� .r. w.rrw. urrr.�r a AlaA I "/,.m PAMELA PARK - EDINA AIP0606 SECTIONS 8 DETAILS MNA, MN 55424 a' t' g� 9 es.n wi a.msz AM KU MM %U rl. rant IQy10r mmD mmw • mr s How am 4¢ E9m m WE a Rmu= Fan i a.�mwzia m wsv¢ mwiam � wa awmno, asv a .rartu z . ra.r a .• war : wwo.® sown M we wpe sa M � v M nwp s o.rnuaa m awl n �m w eorroi ws v ,rc wv .r .'d waOp�p w. svA aww.t .. aamrns ro wm.t fd aose ws0 w amc ulirw � rlpp� qw rrC � ro nsr aa.ar m ao.s we. ro M aaa ,c. seem r-�mss easy w.am., S 01Iw1Cla1 m wm,w oma® .wss ro aow� mmpr. n secnoN • T .. Mobile MINNEAPOLIS MARKET wmix mows w. m m wama ss e M � wmn v rye _ +.ewaa w,wR .10 S IDrt m M w,.aci Aw � 000Drt11L VII wer. ,Iw w �wrpl O M IdA > m awws M wwlw4 no® na .am m wlrl,w rt 1101 wmar .Iw .w1a. Mr R w1y qr t Ipm.� � IDIr Ot wr�w mamma n.w� •rte° dwwu... �www+rw wr � ww a � Isr�vwrar enpw. s w w M,N PAMELA PARK - EDINA A7P0606 SECTIONS 8 DETAILS EdNA UN 55424 �� AIP060642 11 .s „ l • f F• I oa NEW UTILITY SERVICE ONE - LINE DUIGRIW STANDARD (24GV) oa1O1+•ccc�' ,uu wnt a�� w•mPimrair (]) Jp i moal malLrr■ �T a■ra fat a/o s m.w man■a rump fA N ••o WIRING OL40RAM a� N 2 . >A mo• 2— r¢ old aA s ■ N P. ]/a• srxnR •/ s LL1M SIR I. mrram m rm■w.R ro .a.. unm �R i M1 mWOlr •■ •,ID.4 Mf9ED •a �� m�r■� ■wss •mm •am sm oierrcrs Im a>+� ■u ra rams �� ■ I■■ID m9F • wrwr ImR ■ 'mm m[ rsawa ImE w ■amm n mr [mnc q�r np1OgmmEa ap ac � �. mr�il a�i s�wowo -rya sysia ®4 ' � s mrm mar aa■ Ims m aa• �1 _' \�c. ''�'� ` � \ • u+ Doom m aaro ae a ; ' ='' r _ ; _a s au an•■IC mra:me m s war mo +\\ �' ' AFPWW IOn01 6 R•L TI( 1 SWYYO r. am+at mrtanv m n•i srrc +' �. .,••� ... �'' \ ' oa: r wort •ua awrm ■r � \, \ \ ®/ ''' '' / ` ` ' j� � � �; W • sa. m mar rror \ \ \ G V� woosm ran aam ra ' ; �frm Iw+arcr uoeop r - `rnoa� j � W .aa.® oo.4m (aca o•rq 1 \ 00 •ui Ve a•c .Boom m �� \\ ` \ \ �� / / a ■■a emr fr'RJ ` �'- f \ f� \ POWER AND GROUNDING PLAN • lug na ■•so w ror m ralaa •o rc to woan s r�mc _ n•a•■n r••rar ro 4 urr m rK r..m m no T .. Mobile •n ItJM v rlp OA4 M rr■a nY® ror RtOrrt �1w■,16 ■0.r. wo .om m wruw n ual Imar wo .om rr4 o®r m c aro•■a rw n a ve s o•mm ma. Ian a n mmwaa � mwr rAOQ ■10 1wN rpl n O MINNEAPOLIS MARKET 0� LLrlla •� -p s rru>s �rU1Pa •■ aN loc •.■ � \ Y¢u i i v ar>a ■ w � s f PAMELA PARK - EDINA I nap. Al P0606 POWER AND GROUNDING PLAN EDINA, ■N 55424 lit —+ — AA1P06064E S 1 :� 000a �yLe (n r C* �y lase REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and Members of Agenda Item IV. C. the City Council. From: John Keprios, Direct Consent Park & Recreation De me t Information Only ❑ Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution #2009 -61 Resolution ❑ Motion Of Support for an Environmental ® Resolution Assessment Worksheet of Potential ❑ Ordinance Regional Trail Segments Within ❑ Discussion the City of Edina. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution #2009 -61, which is a Resolution of Support for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet of Potential Regional Trail Segments within the City of Edina as part of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. INFO /BACKGROUND: Three Rivers Park District has requested that the Council approve Resolution #2009 -61 to show the City of Edina's support for Three Rivers Park District to hire an independent professional consulting firm at Three River's expense to conduct an Environmental Assessment Worksheet on all segments of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail currently under study within the City of Edina. The results of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet will provide objective data that will be used to determine a preferred regional trail route through the City. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -61 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET OF POTENTIAL REGIONAL TRAIL SEGMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, the City of Edina has expressed interest and support for the development of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina and Three Rivers Park District are currently in the process of gathering information to determine a preferred route for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the City; and WHEREAS, Three Rivers Park District has proposed to hire, at Park District expense, a qualified independent third party consultant to prepare an Environmental Assessment Worksheet on all segments of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail currently under study within the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina and Three Rivers Park District recognize the results of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet will provide objective data that will be used to determine a preferred regional trail route through the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina supports the efforts of Three Rivers Park District to direct completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and use the results thereof to determine, with City participation, a preferred route for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the City of Edina. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota this 7th day of July, 2009. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2009 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_ City Clerk Ow e AGENDA ITEM: #IV. D. Student Appointment to Planning Commission — Continued to 7 -21 -09 M No packet data ❑ Oral presentation ❑ Information coming B To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director REPORT /RECOMMEN UATION Agenda Item IV.E Consent Recommended Action: Set the hearing date for July 21, 2009. InformationBackground: See attached Planning Commission report. Information Only ❑ Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends FI To HRA ® To Council Subject: Set Hearing Date for a Preliminary Plat to subdivide Action V\, Motion the lot at 5920 Oaklawn into two lots. ❑ Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommended Action: Set the hearing date for July 21, 2009. InformationBackground: See attached Planning Commission report. t A. yob a �t4 H 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 1, 2009 2009.005.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. David Lucachick and Ms. Brenda Cole are proposing to subdivide their existing property at 5920 Oaklawn into two lots. The existing home would remain, and a new home built on the new lot. The existing detached garage and existing driveway would be removed from the site. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5 —A10.) The following is required. 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,710 and 6,707 square feet. Both lots would gain access off Oaklawn Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,699 square feet, median lot depth is 134 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. (See attached median calculations on pages A11- Al2.) The new lots would meet the medians. To address staff concern over the size of the proposed home compared to the neighborhood, the applicant agreed to reduce the building footprint to 1,864 square feet, when the City Code would allow up to 2,013 square feet. A home with an 1,864 square foot footprint would have the larges footprint in the neighborhood. (See page A15.) The applicant intends to sell the proposed new lot. Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low - density residential. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single - family home and detached garage. (See pages A3 and A4.) The detached garage would be removed and a new detached garage built on Lot 1. (See page A9.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single- dwelling district * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and submitted comment. (See page Al 8.) Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house are reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, . garage or driveway would have to be directed to Oaklawn Avenue. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. Primary Issue Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed four lot subdivision is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposed lot areas, lot widths and lot depths would be consistent with the original plat and every lot on this block. (See the original plat and 2 Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,000 s.f. 75 ft 134 ft Lot 1 6,707 s.f.* 50 ft* 134 ft Lot 2 6,710 s.f.* 50 ft* 134 ft * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and submitted comment. (See page Al 8.) Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house are reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, . garage or driveway would have to be directed to Oaklawn Avenue. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. Primary Issue Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed four lot subdivision is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposed lot areas, lot widths and lot depths would be consistent with the original plat and every lot on this block. (See the original plat and 2 current lot configurations on pages Al —A2, A4a, and A13 —A14.) Most lots are 50 feet wide and 134 feet deep as proposed. 2. Reduced building footprint. The applicant proposes to sell the lot with a restriction that would require a slightly smaller footprint than the maximum allowed standard to try and better fit the character of the neighborhood. (See page Al and A15.) Proposed building coverage would be 28 percent. The maximum allowable coverage is 30 percent. Staff would recommend these as conditions of any approval of this subdivision. As a comparison, staff calculated building coverage and number of stories of the homes in the area. (See page A14.) The proposed home and garage would still have a larger footprint than any home and garage on the block. (See page Al 5.) 3. The proposal meets the findings for a variance. Per Section 810.05.Subd.1, of the subdivision ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the variance criteria: a) The hardship is not.a mere inconvenience; and is due to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical condition of the land. The hardship is due to the fact that the subject property is double the size of all lots on this block. This area was originally plated with 50 -foot lots, including the subject property. (See page A4a.) The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood and original plat. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of his property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area. As demonstrated on pages A11 —Al2, the median lot size in this neighborhood is 50 feet wide, 134 feet deep and 6,699 square feet in size. The proposed lots would be 50 feet wide, 134 feet deep and 6,707 and 6,710 square feet in size. b) The condition or conditions upon which the request for a variance is based are unique to the property being platted or subdivided and 3 not generally applicable to other property. The hardship is caused by this Section and not by the applicant. The condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to the Oaklawn area. (See page A2.) Most lots are 50 feet wide. Every lot on this block is 50 feet wide, with the exception of the subject lot. The applicant did not combine the original lots. d) The variance will result in an improved plat or subdivision. The variance will result in an improved plat with single - family homes built on each lot. c) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the land within the plat or subdivision or the neighborhood? No. Given the sizes of other lots in the area, the variances would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The resulting lots would be the same size every other lot on this block. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the two lot subdivision of 5920 Oaklawn Avenue with the lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 7,707 and 7,710 square feet. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width, depth and area. 3. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. 4 C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina Engineering department. C. A survey showing existing and proposed contours. Drainage from the new home, garage and driveway needs to drain to Oaklawn Avenue, and not toward adjacent property. A curb must be installed on the north edge of Lot 1 and south edge of Lot 2 to contain water runoff. Final drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. The existing garage must be removed, and a building permit issued for a new 2 -car garage Lot 1. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 3. The building footprint of the new home on Lot 2 shall be limited to a footprint of 1,864 square feet. City of Edina 5721 570 572! 5720 41oa 3628 0214 H2O 018 012 4408 MOB 3600 1.]N .4721 (320 !31614.112 !30614304 6201 5725 5728 3723 375/ 4100 58THA Be Saw 5800 5801 5800 5801 3/01 3800 S/0} 5800 5801 5805 5801 5805 Sm04 5605 5/00 5803 5805 5804 5805 5809 5808 5508 3604 5808 5808 S/0/ 09 38 5108 5817 5812 5117 5817 5812 3609 511112— SH7 581 5817 — —5816— Sj 58}7 5672 5817 SITE 3818 5/17 3018 3117 5811 5810 k 5671 5820 3827 5820 7877 0810 5821 3820 5/21 5815 5824 5824 51125 5825 S&P 5825 ; 5619 5928 5828 5828 f 5829 $820 5819 021 5029 3828 i 5637 5872 5633 5877 5833 0872 5834 5873 5832 5829 5637 5836 58]7 5830 5837 5036 5837 5830 5837 5876 5837 t 5661 3110 58(1 3610 5611 51.40 5840 SM 5114+ 5645 5/141 SKIS 580 5815 3/36 3815 5036 3641 `'014 5815 59THSr1Y a T7 f9 5901 3900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5800 7601 $905 3901 3903 5901 5905 590/ 390.5 590! 0908 5909 3901 5909 590/ 5909 390/ 24 f 5013 3912 5913 591 9917 59+2 Sim 5912 5917 5910 5917 5016 5917 16 5917 5918 5910 0921 5920 N 590 5971 5925 3921 5923 592 5925 59214 3625 5820 5919 3029 582/ 5929 592/ 5929 5928 5933 39I8 597.1 3972 5937 5971 5937 -I vsms�s een� 5997 5876 5937 5938 5937 5978 3977 5976 5911 5910 59/0 S01 SQ6 5941 5910 5915 5944 5943 594! 044 777{{{ 5915 5911 130] 6070 ST 6001 6036 a 6001 8000 ; 6o9s 6D0! 6005 600! ! ! 6008 8008 1 6009 6812 6017 6012 f s 6977 sots 6017 bole 2 0021 0020 6021 8020 �_ C11121� tS.025 6025 2! 0023 6024 6 6028 0028 8049 B02a T — 6033 6032 6033 20 60]7 -36 8077 0036 6077 I 6021 6041 6040 6038 60.45 8011 0" 6011 002 81779rw J 6033 /1510 ' 4510 / 6109 \11 24 sra 6109 6+oe ua��e.. �,�s -mr a�in�oas calms �Q PID:1902824420103 5920 Oaklawn Ave Edina, MN 55424 M Lake Pameu 11 %1�Ar 1171 • 2�tYU{i�,nn�y' • 1fus:+ Legend Highlighted Feature House Number Labels Street Name Labels .! City Limits /� Creeks Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels 5813 5812 5812 5813 5812 5812 5817 5816 5816 5817 5816 5817 5821 - 5810} 5811 5820 5820 Sd21 5820 5815 5825 5814 t Sd25 5828 5879 5828 3828 5829 S62d } 5829 r. F:9 5832 5833 5R_2 5831 5833 SdJ2 5836 5837 �3E' Sd37 5836 5837- 3838 553 7 ow 5560 5841- 5840 5840. 5840 I- 5811 r 5844 58845 ' 5844 T -' 5844 Sd11 5844 39 57 5901 3900 5901 5900 901 5900 5904 5905 5904 1 5905° TS904 5905 t *: 5 5909 5908 FS 5909; .. S90R ; 24 5911 5913 5912 Y 5913 `5912 - re. 5916 5917= 5916 5 5117 5916 5920 5921 `5910 5924 5925 5924 ~• 5925 5928 5929 5928 rn 59 5928 ,,4137 5933 5932 5933 5931 ;1F 536 « 5937 5936 5937 5936 1' ,:rso1 3911 5940 5941 5944 :ass ` 5945 5911 -lads 3914 5 err 6000 600} 6000 8001 8000 � "' . 6001 6005 BOOB ` 6005 6001 6008 6009 6008. 6012 6013 6012 a 6008 6017 .6016 6017 6016 r 6021 6020 6021 6020 j 6012 i 6023 6021 6023 fi0 ?t MaamedrmArdVS•Can�nga(CI LOC+6 GlS N(r5 0 _ p 1 9 1 1 , 1101 1591 (991 p5) (69) 155) Ise) 4 1561 t 4994 (]]) A (sa x uii 3 pal x LU ,lesl 11571 liel'1r R 1491 " 001 A 557 511 .un .aw W ,un R rvn 1451 1i 11 R 1641 R 1591 � ` (ell 16M 1921 " 1 021 (w) 9 59TH ST W 191) It 14 (141 N 7 SW f 19 ::::N x (991 A x 1 %1 (i 411 (15) raa R ,na x R 951 ,u, x (l 4114 (t t51 (Tel x It t91 p ul r 0041 194) 0t21 (771 ,u(1111 x ft061 R x l9]I 01t o1 1711 I W51 (lue) R 9z) 1791 1(90) x (911 1991 (ell R x 4115) (117) eel 11]1 x (97) 1141 R 1941 lesi 4171 It51 (25) R 1241 It el W rvn w,n R R (23) 09) R 1221 Izo) 4t ' Izltl = r 11241 r It2]) 1121) i n (122) x iLu 60TH ST W This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of infonnation and data from city, county and other sources. 200 400 Feet Print Date: Fri Jul 12 08:38:15 200�Lssssssssss s x l I R (2' 9 It It R T . R n R t x x A tr t R N.112 SE. 114 SEC. 19 T. 028 R.24 SlN1Yfl9 SINE/ 19 SlNW/ 0 It 14 1(991 N 7 SW f 19 ::::N 1 114r 91 (991 R (i 411 It 001 .,u(1r111 Itptl R ,u, x (l 4114 (t t51 1 tu21 00]1 It t91 p ul r 0041 0t21 005) ,u(1111 x ft061 01t o1 0011 I W51 (lue) 4171 It51 (25) R 1241 It el W rvn w,n R R (23) 09) R 1221 Izo) 4t ' Izltl = r 11241 r It2]) 1121) i n (122) x iLu 60TH ST W This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of infonnation and data from city, county and other sources. 200 400 Feet Print Date: Fri Jul 12 08:38:15 200�Lssssssssss s x l I R (2' 9 It It R T . R n R t x x A tr t R N.112 SE. 114 SEC. 19 T. 028 R.24 SlN1Yfl9 SINE/ 19 SlNW/ 0 il ti /SW /19 S /SE /l9 S /SW/ 0 Eighth uarter Section tiq 2 N N 7 SW f 19 ::::N N; S\Y / il ti /SW /19 S /SE /l9 S /SW/ 0 Eighth uarter Section tiq 2 N APPLICANT NARRATIVE 5920 OAKLAWN LOTS 6 & 7, FAIRFAX Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a preliminary plat. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which had not been subdivided to a size similar to the other lots in the neighborhood. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two properties more characteristic of the neighborhood. c. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. Mr. Lucachick said his intent is to sell the unjoined lot and the house property, not develop them. The proposed variance will: Relieve an undue hardship which was not Self- imposed or a mere inconvenience. The original parcel (of which the subject is the remainder) was platted and has been diminished in the past with the sale of lot 8 when a new house was built on that lot in 1969. The current size of the subject parcel (and lot 8 as well) was due to a decision made in prior decades to keep the subject parcel virtually equal in size with any other two lots of the adjacent subdivisions, allowing unjoining, subdivision or platting at a later date. The logic would follow that when the subject was platted, there would be two lots of equal size, similar in width and depth to the adjacent parcels. There is no other property on the subject property's block that was not constructed on a 50 foot lot. The size of the parcel is unique in the neighborhood and is twice the size of any other on the block. Since many decades have passed since the original Fairfax platting, the City of Edina zoning requirements were changed to the current requirements, the subject parcel's historical configuration no longer complies with the minimum lot area and minimum lot width for two lots. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The home on the subject parcel was constructed in 1929. It may be preserved, depending on the buyer of that parcel. The guest house was removed from the other parcel around A5- the year 2000 and could have made the parcel eligible for separation/unjoining instead of subdivision. The current owner removed it to remedy a neighborhood eyesore. The parcel also has sewer and water stubs in the street indicating intent if not expenses for being two parcels dating from when water and sewer were provided in 1951 following the new code requirements for minimum lot sizes. The size of the parcel is unique in the neighborhood and is twice the size of any single parcel on its block. The parcel is conforming as it is, however, this was never the intent of the original platting or how the utilities were put into the street. Also, any house built on such a large lot would likely be oversized in the neighborhood. Unjoining the parcel would more likely result in new construction conforming to the sizes of the surrounding residences. Preserve substantial property rights possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. The proposed unjoining results in two lots of equal size with others on the block and in the niehhborhood. The unjoining mimics the existing neighborhood lot scheme and scale. Presumably, the new construction will be similarly scaled for the neighborhood and will be more affordable than a single lot configuration. The zoning district is single family and is benefited fron the single family nature of the likely construction. Not to be materially detrimental to the public welfarde or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The proposed unjoining comports with the surrounding lots. As a single lot it would result in a lot that is twice the size of the surrounding properties and would likely result in a house out of scale with the neighborhood that would more likely be injurious to the adjacent lot owners. AG �g b z <5 s PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: B� MAP , FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION A BITE Y� R� PROPOSED EASEMENT DATA uANAa w u1Am ETRTUn RE aw Isla m e ,¢, N 4e9nL w .now Im uova"10 ��"i'.sr NOTE& 1. COMA EASING Um RES AND TREE La Ticw PRIOR To FINAL HOUSE DESNN. 1 TRIAL SITE A CMOND PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY CRT. SIZE SPECm EROSION CONTRA PRACTICES AND SEQUEHONO TO BE ADDRESSED AT `THAT TIME v v1E 4e x5ue 91sva acalm IOPHER STATE ONE CALL u.A all swacc IMB eLLr° ®aw:'.mw n��..vl H Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC pW .I.IL 9N.INECA 11R AAP LAMB URV9rIxa a9alA1VIm �—'Yu /S ,.. :rN4 .nm. RJRn rv:l..m. nTw:mr m..: NORTH scar.: nx1 LEGEND ,N P9m® OWIOR - -01D -- PROP09n 1U CvaM euNAS:.m9. ----------- - - - - -- —. —r— SAIL SrQ —.ter— nIV® eYl IIY —r —r— effiIw r —r -1— rAOn® r FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION EDINA, MINNESOTA DAVE LUCACHICK PROPERTY ADDREBB 5970 OANUYN AVEME. EONw 101 55424 I Pn41 RIPTION: P.I.D. 19-028 -2-42 -010.7 LDTS B A0 7. BLODI 14. FANFAK ACCaRONa M THE RECalmm PLAT THE Ear. IE U- CC-W- MNN60TA SITE DATA' MMN0 2 1131 - RESMTUL (RI) PARCEL AREA °0.70 ACRES EtlSTNG Lam - 2 TOTAL MOPOSM LOTS - 2 SETBACK& PRRR PAL PRAT: 30• (OR AVERAGE OF AOACENT HDIES) STRUCTURE'. SIDE. 5• REM: 25• DETACHED SA#: J GMAfi: REM: J LOT REQUIREMENT& SINGTE FAMAY NDG160AN00D. MEET 500' NOMMORHOW AVERAGE & WVFRA E -- ]16 w D0. Lor rABUUnoN OWNER,APPLICANT: DAVID LUCACHICK 5920 GAKLANN AVENUE EDINA. MN 55424 (952) 922.9310 ENGINEER ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13905 1ST AVE N. SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH. MN 55441 MIKE BRANDVOLD. RE (793) 412 -4000 SURVEYOR ANDERSON ENGNFERING OF MINNESOTA. LLC 13505 1ST AVE N. SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH. MN 55441 JACK BOLKE (763) 412 -4000 IND SHE OLCRIPTON 1 PRFIIMINARY PLAT 2 PRELIMINARY SITE GRADING k U71UTY - EKISONG CONDITIONS SURVEY PRELIMINARY PLAT of 2 GO I r- - -- -- --- - - -..- NB9' 09'E 134.10 I ea v 19p9 COT i I 11 _I Il 1 —r - -7 1 r I- I LOT 2 Low• Dxrunlc - emr Dan - S8972'09'v a J 9TTeAO •. • • NRAn •. w ur s - -..- I I nlsrlo IK I IMB eLLr° ®aw:'.mw n��..vl H Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC pW .I.IL 9N.INECA 11R AAP LAMB URV9rIxa a9alA1VIm �—'Yu /S ,.. :rN4 .nm. RJRn rv:l..m. nTw:mr m..: NORTH scar.: nx1 LEGEND ,N P9m® OWIOR - -01D -- PROP09n 1U CvaM euNAS:.m9. ----------- - - - - -- —. —r— SAIL SrQ —.ter— nIV® eYl IIY —r —r— effiIw r —r -1— rAOn® r FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION EDINA, MINNESOTA DAVE LUCACHICK PROPERTY ADDREBB 5970 OANUYN AVEME. EONw 101 55424 I Pn41 RIPTION: P.I.D. 19-028 -2-42 -010.7 LDTS B A0 7. BLODI 14. FANFAK ACCaRONa M THE RECalmm PLAT THE Ear. IE U- CC-W- MNN60TA SITE DATA' MMN0 2 1131 - RESMTUL (RI) PARCEL AREA °0.70 ACRES EtlSTNG Lam - 2 TOTAL MOPOSM LOTS - 2 SETBACK& PRRR PAL PRAT: 30• (OR AVERAGE OF AOACENT HDIES) STRUCTURE'. SIDE. 5• REM: 25• DETACHED SA#: J GMAfi: REM: J LOT REQUIREMENT& SINGTE FAMAY NDG160AN00D. MEET 500' NOMMORHOW AVERAGE & WVFRA E -- ]16 w D0. Lor rABUUnoN OWNER,APPLICANT: DAVID LUCACHICK 5920 GAKLANN AVENUE EDINA. MN 55424 (952) 922.9310 ENGINEER ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13905 1ST AVE N. SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH. MN 55441 MIKE BRANDVOLD. RE (793) 412 -4000 SURVEYOR ANDERSON ENGNFERING OF MINNESOTA. LLC 13505 1ST AVE N. SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH. MN 55441 JACK BOLKE (763) 412 -4000 IND SHE OLCRIPTON 1 PRFIIMINARY PLAT 2 PRELIMINARY SITE GRADING k U71UTY - EKISONG CONDITIONS SURVEY PRELIMINARY PLAT of 2 TORY lER P n ® VFNnW A AN NCO fe i�i��O'°�v aw. q•.s w.v.sewu.. 'miv°sJ'::w •w'"mi...eOxm..co ®�i '.ce09"Oi. 1i rm�'w'°..1 m1v� W lER P IHnGR PREVFTRnOH PL -- ^T ^l r 6 IMtT•1I ATON R Y•MIENAN� CMA� I id w I I I f- - - - - -- 1` R I III I 1 1 I I IOQ 1 1 1 1 ,m 1a xor®oR —R RsIO1W / Pom.n r..xe rmr v rt.®i. Ins AxoYlus teem 1xnt�wl � �•�10 1ta C m. :rs�smnrm�ix m�Fmnxu� a ®r�i .tx`rt.w�nn" Tvalrel INCTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE (4cnM LA vfJl •xm xYNOnn rR.ctua'1 ;.SN �r,Ay NORTH LEGEND ® 1PP� ta11M ��b� rM® 1P tlMIM GY • ORipl — — . — D • u EAmmR uxE ................. airmE —. —.— oatenw c>o1 -1 -1- rI0113m r R tm m t xon� LO mmRi Vovn .Im® xnl..n uu NOTE& 1. CONFIRM MSIMG UDUDES MW TREE LOCAMON PRIOR TO FRAIL HGt4 DESIGN. 2 MAL SITE. GRADING PLAN TO BE APPROVED Br OTT. SITE SPECP1C EROSION COMOL PRACDCEE AND SEOUEHMG TO E ADDRESSED AT THAT nYE 1 OYMER TD COWIRY SITE AIR) TYPE OF RETAMMD WALL BLOGRS/BGL)FAS AT TOE OF BIiDMO PEl)Il APILGTIGL .. RETIOVE EOSTMG ORP.E ACROSS ROT f AFTER BRA KHO PW.T APPROVAL S BCNOOIARR TOP NUT OE HYDRANT ELEVATOR - W.RO WL Y 1x11116 ®B2 ®Y GOPHER STATE ONE Gsll —.11 -TORRE Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY GRADING 8E DR.xo ORArM: r1 1 o� C-L sxPlPeExlxP .IIO L.x) FuP.srixP EDINA, MINNESOTA TMR c_—z2� /z I..n ImRL.rtxR... nMY16 Y..t DAVE LUCACHICK UTILITY PLAN 2 of 2 CHECKER BD RWAINP: xn D•rz DEVYFmw ar RLYTSiDxe PArt IrErRg .tnx m Rr•» .tx -.® .0 ttwR .n -wrx I I FM 6.6 FT. / WEST of Lm - - -- 1:873.99 GARAGE —o — )1 s 60.00 - I cw v l A Rl i p I I�p RETAINING \ I III tr WALL � . ;� I I I y SILT FENCE DWELLING -- - - -- 34.- -- a ;-+.57 / / _ OII P p� 14X / /I r u III / Oh / - - - - -- 33,3 - -j- I WATER sEa �0� f / °_' ° SIT" � s= LANDSCAPE PA WZ ukh ` .n S NECESSARY (TYPICAL} / I 1:873.99 I� u )1 WATER SUL I 1 2' Cu W t I / ��4 CONNECT EX. .� i o r / 1 ► I' "� SEW/WAT STUBS MATH 1 1 /2' CU _ i SANa I • ,°y {� II WATER do 6' PVC SAN (MIN 1 �� 1 ' SILT FENCE/ / 1 I 119 MAINTAIN EXIST. DRIVE BIG —LOGS ------ 39.6 --- % /'-7 I I I� II ACCESS I IW ------- 60 00 - -- ----- - - - - -- I CONSTRUCTION 1 ENTRANCE AT TIME OF HOME CONSTRUCTION i1 " r � I n L. I (134.09 PER PUT) ., DWELLING - - - - - -- 34.71 - - - - -- N89'22'0 9 "E I III 134.10 c• ...ST III 3' GARAGE — —, "" _ SETBACK I p+w ` — — — — — CONG _ I 3 roll TYPICAL PROPOSED °'+w ! ` - GAS — — — — 1 5 - --- --�- -I v `� `�Omw 8 GARAGE ------ I , I ��� iJ' 3].13 . + 24' d v m O WAttR sER. „ T o I !� LOT 1 Edo I� _II t/ 1 41 I I m L. I II I, L I Zoe �N. o.s Fr. _ 6.61 I I _ ` C) II PEST OF UNE . -� _ J ,1 / n 0= SWTARY- GARAGE �', f REMOVE GAR. = = ` — _ GARAGE L t _ /�I PAS WALK] I II o OM �WI � - I p , r _ _ O 14 6.57 h � 1/ O I I R —r -- O, _ e,t 00 � I 1 O :`REMOVE. D� _ / °' ~�4, 0 :..GONG FOLMDATION .V , O \ t-7 4' CONC. W I 1 12' PROPOSED �s TER >ER ol T 1" O I I I T 1.384 SF \ I '- I I + I 1 - LOT 2 a PROPOSED E " \ 39.\ 5� SM. (I GARAGE 48D SF �� L0 LZZ 24' ' `_�� --- - - - - -- - - -- -tea CORKER (134.06 PER PUT) LL9•e MAgJ' GARAGE °N "K 134.25 °�T S89'22 -09 "W DWELLING -- - - -- -- 39EQ 1 ACCE 3' GARAGE EAST SETBACK BLOCTYPICAL AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK LINE i i :1 500 FOOT NEIGHBORHOOD MAP w 1 4 • — � w w s s f•r wfl�f� M • j —� N W E S 78 r ! ! M fl — w o w ! ! — N — •• — — ! ! w ! — f ! ! � ! — ! ! ! N — — ! ! ! r .m a M !M b N mv ! r ` M M• wfl�f� M • j —� N W E S 78 r s ! 1• fl — w o w N •• — — ! ! — f � � ! — ! ! ! ! a w M !M wfl�f� M • j —� N W E S 78 71 s — 1• fl w ft ..f_ -, &a. "kb � o iw w w wl�fR I I \ I---- I � 1 ------ -- - - I I I I • � I CI I I �u I I ------------ - -� - II w� I I •1 `•__300 FT RADM cm I I �• ri3loklw�a) m0 6 - 0 100 200 300 500 SCALE IN FEET Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING 13805 1ST AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 100, PLYMOUTH, UN 55441 TEL (783) 412 -4000 FAX (783) 412 -4080 NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS FOR 6920 OAKLAWN AVENUE, EDINA MINNESOTA REP NUMBER HOUSE NUMBER STREET NAME LOT WIDTH FEET LOT DEPTH FEET LOTAREA 50 FT - OWNER LEGALDESCRIPTION 1 5841 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.7 6,634 P M AND D G MERRIGAN LOT 14, BLOCK 4 2 5665 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.7 6,633 CHRISTINE M MADIGAN LOT 13, BLOCK 4 3 5836 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.7 6,635 M E B P F HENRY LOT 10, BLOCK 4 4 5840 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 1321 6,635 WAYNE W DVORAK TRUSTEE LOT 11, BLOCK 4 5 5844 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.7 6,833 C W 8 S J MOSERG LOT 12, BLOCK 4 6 5829 KELLOGG AVE 75.0 1342 10,065 ROSS R PHERNETTON ETAL LOT 17 AND N 12 OF LOT 16 5837 KELLOGG AVE 75.0 1342 10,004 R G d J M COWAN LOT 15 AND S 12 OF LOT 7& BLOCKS 5&15 KELLOGG AVE 100.0 1342 13,416 H 8 Y d H KIM LOTS 13 AND 14, BLOCK 3 5832 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1342 6,710 MARY L DICK LOT 9, BLOCK 3 R12 5836 OAKLAWN AVE SOD 1342 6,710 MARL.ENE J SCHLEIMER TRUSTEE LOT 10, BLOCK 3 5840 OAKLAWNAVE 5000 1342 6,709 VIKTOR JEGERS LOT II, BLOCK 5844 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1342 6,708 ANDREW 0 SESON LOT 72, BLOCK 3 5833 OAKLAWN AVE 60.0 1342 8,052 PATRICK D REGAN LOT 16 AND S 10 FT OF LOT17, BLOCK 2 5837 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1342 6,709 JEAN M MITCHELL LOT 15, BLOCK 2 5847 OAKLAWN AVE 1D8.5 1342 14,557 MAYNARD R SANDBERG LOTS I3 AND 141NCLADJ 72 OF STREET VACATED, BLOCK2 5838 BRODKVIEW AVE 50.0 1342 8,709 TURN KEY CONSTRUCT FIN LLC LOT 10, BLOCK 2 F14 5840 BROOKVIEW AVE 60.0 1342 6,709 ROBERT M BRAUN LOT 11, BLOCK 2 58" BROOKVIEW AVE 50.0 1342 6,706 R N 8 I L BERGREN TR LOT 12, BLOCK 2 SB 45 BROOKVIEW AVE 65.0 1342 6,729 T L B L A SULLIVAN LOT 13, BLOCK 1 5901 OAKLAWN AVE 57.0 134.1 7.80 CAROLLEARN LOT 24, INCA D, LO OF STREET VACATED, BLOCK 14 21 5805 OAKLJIWN AVE 62.7 134.1 8.407 D 0 AMUNDSON ETAL LOT W BS FT AND N ZA FT OF T LOT 22. BLOCK 22 22 5907 WOODDALE AVE 48.6 132.8 61447 DAN SCHWARTZ LOT 24, BLOCK 13 23 5905 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.6 6,632 PETER T FOLEY 11 LOT 23, BLOCK 13 24 5909 WOODDALEAVE SOD 132.8 6.631 ANGELA M BREWER LOT 22, BLOCK 13 25 5913 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.8 6,630 IRMA F CONROY LOT 21, BLOCK 13 26 5917 WOODDALEAVE 50.0 132.8 6,630. JOANNE HOLMESISTEVE SWANSON LOT 20, BLOCK 13 27 5921 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.8 1 6,629 DOROTHY M BUSCH LOT 19, BLOCK 13 28 5925 WOODDALEAVE 50.0 1328 6,628 DAVID A S TU1 K SMYTHE LOT 18, BLDCK 13 29 5929 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.8 6,628 CYNTHIA MACDONALD LOT 17, BLOCK 13 30 5933 WOODDALEAVE 5DA 132.5 6,627 J M 8 J A MATHIS LOT 16, BLOCK 13 31 6937 WOODDALEAVE 50.0 132.5 6,627 J R 8 V L SCHED W LOT 15, BLOCK 13 32 5941 WOODDALE AVE 508 132.5 6.628 LUKE HELLIER ETAL LOT 14. BLOCK 13 33 5945 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 1325 8,625 EO TRST CO FBO D PEARSON IRA LOT 13. BLOCK 13 34 5900 KELLOGG AVE 48.6 132.6 6,442 S M 8 K R METZ LOT 1, BLOCK 13 35 5904 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 1328 6,632 ALIEN D CAVELL LOT 2. BLOCK 13 36 5908 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 1326 8,631 A C ELIZABETH B P A ENGLUND LOT 3, BLOCK 13 37 5912 KELLOGG AVE 508 1328 6,630 ANN CLAIRE THOMPSON LOT 4. BLOCK 13 36 5916 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6,630 M L 8 H L SCOTT LOT 5, BLOCK 13 39 5920 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6,629 C GURON 8 K KAUR LOT 8, BLOCK 13 40 5924 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 61629 HOOSNANG MEHRALIW LOT 7, BLOCK 13 41 5926 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6,628 M 8 J GENTRY LOT 8, BLOCK 13 42 5932 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6,627 DEBRORAH RENGWELSKI LOT 9, BLOCK 13 43 5936 KELLOGG AVE 60.0 132.5 6,627 A D 8 C A DAMAN LOT 10, BLOCK 13 44 5940 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 1323 61628 WALTER H OLSON ETAL LOT 11, BLOCK 13 45 5944 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 1325 6,625 SOLVEIG MARIE NORSTOG LOT 72, BLOCK 13 46 5907 KELLOGG AVE 48S 134.1 61509 S 8 C FISHER LOT 24, BLOCK 14 47 5905 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,707 JOHN WILLIAM BRANTZ TRUSTEE LOT 23, BLOCK 14 48 5909 KELLOGG AVE 60.0 134.1 8.706 GLORIA D LEE LOT 2Z, BLOCK 14 49 5913 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 8,705 L 8 H BORGEN LOT 21, BLOCK 14 50 5917. KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,705 N P 8 K 8 NELSON LOT 20, BLOCK 14 51 5921 KELLOGG AVE 60.0 134.1 0,704 P R KRIDER 8 S J WEGMANN LOT 19, BLOCK 14 52 5925 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,703 L A FERRELL ET AL LOT 18, BLOCK 14 53 5929 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 8,703 MARY M BRAUN TRUSTEE LOT 17, BLOCK 14 54 5933 KELLOGG AVE SOD 134.0 6.702 JAMES 0 GUSE LOT 16, BLOCK 14 65 5937 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6.702 TIMID V JUUJARVI ETAL LOT 15, BLOCK 14 58 5941 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6.701 STACY A BARSHAP LOT 14. BLOCK 14 S7 5945 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 60700 IDELLE J A 8 CARL W SHANNON LOT 13, BLOCK 14 513 5900 OAKLAWN AVE 48.6 134.7 8,505 J S 8 S M AURA LOT 1, BLOCK 14 69 594 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6,707 BRUCE J B ANNE S PARKER LOT 2. BLOCK 14 60 5908 OAKLAWN AVE 508 134.1 6,708 IDEAL APARTMENTS LLC LOT 3, BLOCK 14 61 5912 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6,705 P M B E B KAISER LOT 4, BLOCK 14 62 5979 OAKLAWN AVE SOD 134.1 6,705 NELLASALLEN LOT 5, BLOCK 14 63 5928 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6,703 JOHN T ERICSON LOT S. BLOCK 14 64 5932 OAKLAWN AVE 60.0 134.0 6.702 AMY MAUREEN SONDE LOT 9, BLOCK 14 65 5936 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 8,702 R M B 8 J F KELLEY LOT 10, BLOCK 14 66 5940 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,701 M H GLEASON 8 R C PENDLETON LOT 11, BLOCK 14 67 5944 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 8,700 J T 8 O E ARNOLO LOT 12, BLOCK 14 88 6001 WOODDALE AVE 626 1325 8,298 S F BRADFORD 8 M S FRANSSEN LOT 24 AND N OF LOT 29, BLOCK 2 K 20 69 6005 WOODOALE AVE 62.0 132.5 8.213 RACHEL SZYMANSKI N 26 FT OF LOT 22 AND S 36 FT OF LOT 23, BLOCK 20 70 6DOO KELLOGG AVE 488 132.5 6,433 N L OUIN 8 C L MAGOID -0UIN LOT 1, BLOCK 20 71 604 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6,624 JESSE MARTIN LOT Z. BLOCK 20 72 6008 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 1327 6,633 S R BREIDENBACH LOT 3, BLOCK 20 73 6001 KELLOGG AVE 46.5 134.0 6,501 PATRICK S CONLON LOT 24, BLOCK 19 74 6005 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,699 D Y W CHEUNG 8 F M TRICE LOT 23, BLOCK 19 75 6009 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,699 DIANE J HUBBARD TRUSTEE LOT 72. BLOCK 49 76 6013 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,698 MICHAEL R LARSEN LOT 21, BLOCK 19 77 6000 OAKLAWN AVE 48.5 134.0 6,497 J B 8 A A YUHAS LOT 1, BLOCK 19 7B 604 OAKLAWN AVE 60.0 1342 6,699 KY00 IL KIM 8 SAET BYUL PARK LOT 2, BLOCK 19 79 604 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,698 DANIEL B 8 LUANNE KUNA LOT 3, BLOCK 19 80 6D72 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,698 L B 8 J M ANDERSON LOT 4, BLOCK 19 MEAN 52.7 133.4 7,037 " All Legal Deaoriphone ere ft plat of FAIRFAX. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA' MEDIAN 50.0 734.0 6,698 Ala, 12367 ANALYSIS 03 e m m ST W 5901 5905 24 24 PARE [-A p A# :ztilt 59TH ST W 5900 590f 5900 5904 5905 5904 5908 5909 5908 5� 5912 59 }3 5912 5916 5917 5916 5920 5921 5920 5924 5925 5928 5929 5928 5932 5933 5932 5936 5937 5936 5940 5941 5940 5944 5945 5944 BOTH ST W e�m��t�ea�us czy,antctea�sv�,ans � 03 5845 5RTH 5844 ST W 5841 5844 50TH ST W 5845 5844 5901 5901 5900 59 f 59 r 590 5905 5905 5904 5905 f� I � 24 5909 5908 5909 I • � 5908 I s�o� 5912 _26 .... __...__....._.._...: 5913 5912 5913 59fG 5917 59f6 5L9T7 1 Sr S 5921 5920 5921 5920 Q 5925 5924 C m 5925 I s 5928 5929 5928 592 5933 5933 5932 5932 5936 a Pamela Park 5937 5936 5937 iIS s s 5940 1•� .44 5944 S Si W 5941 5940 5941 ( $ 5945 5944 5945 BOTH 6000 6001 6001 6000 6005 6004 6004 e�av��- n<+us cz��raalci�arsc�am eaen f� I � 5845 5644 30o 5845 5844 5841 5844 5913 ►,4id s. F. 5911 5917 I,��o s. F. 69TH ST 59TH Sr W 592Q 5925 I 77� S.f� 5901 5901 5900 5932 5937 Hoe s,f. 5936 I,ZO� S.F. 5941 5905 5904 5944 � ,�� S.f 5905 24 5909 5908 24 ........................... ............................... ......... 5913 5912 5917 5916 5921 5920Q' 5925 5924 n m m 5929 5926 5933 5932 Pamela Park 5937 5936 5941 5940 5945 5944 6Ur11 sr W 6001 6000 6001 6000 6004 6005 6004 �1sca »ada.- iArJ�15.C2rfu'cIC;_O: LS GL:3)7; - 541M1 590! 590Q I�`W- S.r. 30o 384 s.F. 5909 •o 5908 5913 ►,4id s. F. 5911 5917 I,��o s. F. 5916 93G s.F. 5921 I,�so s,f 592Q 5925 I 77� S.f� s9z9 I ofl S.F. 5925 I,00a s,f. 5933 5932 5937 Hoe s,f. 5936 I,ZO� S.F. 5941 5940 5945 1/754 s � f. 5944 � ,�� S.f ZU ILOIAJ G Coy RA6 C Ilk = re o"W 1 1�n W= t'l LU Xlkl�; , Jr . 4,, lot -- o� a ay MEMORANDUM ® Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: June 25, 2009 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FRONT: Wayne Houle - Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Fairfax 2nd Addition Engineering has reviewed the preliminary plat and the preliminary grading and utility plan.for the above stated subdivision and offer the following comments: O A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit may possibly be required with this subdivision. Sheet 2 of 2 — Preliminary Gradina & Utility Plan: 1. Revise swale to not have water drain from Lot 1 to Lot 2. 2. Line or replace both sanitary sewer services from the homes to the mainline. 3. Indicate a curb on the outer edge of both driveways (north edge for Lot 1 and south edge for Lot 2) to contain runoff water to each Lot. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks ki GAEngineering \General\O Streets\Fairfax 2nd Addition - Oaklawn Ave\20090625 review of Fairfax 2nd Addition.doc I a 3 5 N i 3 v z 0 W Y V X n .0 M N 0 D QIT AIAn PRELIMINARY PLAT OF.- FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION I - I X va k w I 1 ` ^ n � I 0.154 n ' f � v 16.4 GIST 1 ST W ° 4 1,664 -- r TOTAL — 1 0.308 I �r �" ``� v r .. ^ T It i PROPOSED EASEMENT DATA IL.— HF fi4r) "E DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN 7NUS , 34.09 134.10 r- I ___N89- -��_- � {t TYPICAL PROPOSED Z I 328 SF �- \ — J 0 o n; 0 24' ,I I ,'� LOT 1 I BmIG s FEET N WIDTH, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES UNLESS OTNERWSE INDICATED AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. GARAGE '' �'� ' i REMOVE GAR. - GARAGE L o 34, 4 O0N I PROPOSEC HOUSE NOTES v I I 1.384 SF I I LOT 2 1. CONFIRM EXISTING UTILITIES AND TREE w LOCATION PRIOR TO FINAL HOUSE DESIGN. �4 1 2. FINAL SITE & GRADING PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY CITY. SITE SPECIFIC — law EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES AND SEQUENCING TO BE ADDRESSED AT GARAGE °'�` 134.25 � THAT TIME. S89'22'09 °W G n CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAL 811 STATEWIDE I — —I I I I I I O to i3 o I 0 I I -- ---------- - - - - -1 1 u III I I I I �II _ II 1 I Y II � u Y II - �xur�tlnmR.wr i 11� 1 I Y _ 0 I - II II MAINTAIN ' EXIST. DRIVE Im 1 Acl> =ss I ly y I e __- I-9 - ---- . 60M ----------- \ I l `AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK LINE DESIGNED: I HEREBY —III'! THAT TIRS PLAN. SPEOFICAMOK OR REPORT WAS MBB A DULY ED OR DI�T11n DNG� SUPERVISION AND MAT OF A" Anderson Engineering of Minnesota LLC A DULY F MINI PRaNCmoxAL ENGINEER UNDER TIff uvs ai THE STATE 6 1m0QSOTA DRAWN: PRINT NAPE: r� -A, n i CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND S U R VEYINC 7VH V Y� /J CHECKED BY: SIGNATURE: 13e05 lat AVENUE NORTH, SURE 100. PLYMOUTH. MN 55441 DATE DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS DATE MAY 18. 2009 LICENSE / 41258 TEL (763) 412 -4000 FAX (765) 412 -4000 NORTH o Io m w SCALE IN FEET LEGEND ------- 902-------- EXISTING CONTOUR ----- -- 91G-- -- - - -- EXISTING 10' CONTOUR eo2 PROPOSED CONTOUR -010— PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR CURB A GUTTER - - - - - - - - - BUNG. SETBACK LINE . - - D R U EASEMENT LINE DRAINAGE ARROW ----------- - - - - -- SILT FENCE - - EXISTING SAN. SEVER —) —I— PROPOSED SAN. SEWER -I I— EXISTING WM —1 -1— PROPOSED VNM —u n— EXISTING STORY SEWER nr r` FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION EDINA, MINNESOTA DAVE LUCACHICK PROPERTY ADDRESS 5920 OAKLAWN AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55424 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: P.I.D. 19- 028 -24-42 -0103 LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 14, FAIRFAX. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING a RESIDENTIAL (RI) PARCEL AREA N! 0.30 ACRES EXISTING LOTS - 2 TOTAL PROPOSED LOTS = 2 SETBACKS: PRINCIPAL FRONT: 30' (OR AVERAGE OF ADJACENT HOMES) STRUCTURE: SIDE 5' REAR: 25' DETACHED SIDE 3' GARAGE REAR: 3' LOT REQUIREMENTS: SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD. MEET 500' NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGE OF WIDTH, DEPTH AND AREA. BLDG COVERAGE - 307E LOT TABULATION LOT AREA Si AREA ACRES BLDG SF AREA BLDG. COVERAGE X 1 1 6,707 0.154 1 1,235 16.4 2 1 6.710 1 0.154 1,664 27.8 TOTAL 1 13,417 1 0.308 OWNER /APPLICANT: DAVID LUCACHICK 5920 OAKLAWN AVENUE EDINA, MN 55424 (952) 922.6310 ENGINEER ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13605 1ST AVE N. SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 MIKE BRANDVOLD, P.E. (763) 412 -4000 SURVEYOR ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13605 1ST AVE N. SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 JACK BOLKE (763) 412 -4000 INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 PRELIMINARY SITE, GRADING & UTILITY - EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PRELIMINARY PLAT UWL NO. 12367 1 of 2 w A 3 a D LO M i H (T 3 z 0 w Ne U rl STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES: t. fAADYG C @RAC1@ SNKL MD1Ir 1OG11b6 A10 EILVAT1a14 DF ALL UMDEROMAm uRIllES MM M m�ECM u1RlT O]RAME9 PRIOY ro L'a6Tml[llal x Au T ATK cd YEASTl64 F• MT F@ d TESE BANS APL SPEORG,IdS OMA YAT AMS. E 917 ,,,�. TRUCTMT,TmM e.9r6 DR �E,®DRAR SmR6NT RAPS 9 A L� Eds m c m .. M Fa11MRm amER ROOF WMSaWTd M.ATFaS A YRmAY a "T='. g 917 FML G TEMORKt• SIMa ii D. STMIN RAT FZDRmIl,lld BAi6 Atm daAg FAm1tEA L —I fA AND Wr14 WSAA R F. Coral OtGV,lld AND EWKEOENi ( @ADIf ) K L 0A40E- T R eARRE 11S m @AOCD Aa M FA @E O l A M SINN SEru rTnA I fFA@IO cdrAET@ SwLL mow[ AAm — ALL ER69a1 — 1[A9RR5 x AtmmKla rTM on Alm rsocs RI,LSt F PEA — awR..'S As — a 0— -- I(A As YAr BE SxDW d nrEg PLANS @ SDECDYA1M46. @A@m WNTRACT@ .— ,s1AEEM1 .Yr ADOTR7MAL [RO90u CaITRg Y[ASUm ws wr s IKORtLD ro moral AD.NCdI PTmP@n. FA—M S— E CR09d mllAd VAR— A M CWIRAR@ aErf @AIRY, OO40a6 AMY TDF@ANI FACRITES YtmF ARE To a RTILOrn As uLLm r@ d Tr8 PLMS ArD SPE@ICATYY6 SHALL � BENDIER ar M @AD.m cd1RACT@ Vol DREEi[D er M ENm®r. M O4@m cRrACT@ SN.0 irEM m3TOQ M 9gscDnFnr 06nA6[D ARG N AGD@DAYa rM 11RS RAMS AIm SPECECAllO6 4 rve @Aemo CONTRACR9 91ATI sdmuc M Sao oa®+ 5O MAT CERTEICAIIaI S ALL CallTalm ILLS WI S fIMA9m ID M OFImI OIIRm: ATm 1Nd C011A[Ta1 a M mOLCI. e. Au o6n® ARGq Pf L AYNl. R O9Y® Ll Ae} < M Ca SENTC® ESA E ®A® M RISl,woyi[s m 4 o TD r M IeI• t W P An D l@ l O. 1MlO9 a Mr mm T Uer D S AT A SEOESrEAD P [ 01)ERYSC MOl[D. 5[ p TIM 1 'm I TAD4 ((D a r_ TERTEIIIn 50/ /ACa Ml[ APPIa. 2FTo- D DBQYD Sm AREAS MM A [dTrlO6 P69M SITE a— D@ LAI[K (al O AY• SuRFAa WA TM loco HAZE TDP@M• Goad PROTECTWI @ PUMANDIT COIER IN M nwasm SN. ARCS r[M RaAID. ACWmDm ro M FnLCOm TARS n San AIm lal ISA1[S ma (IL.4T•M IAr. - — — r.rl•M r•..I.I D. — Y cot s—q GM1p ..IW) STEEP@ T>YM Y1 1) DAIS —TIER "'S MAIN IDI r I. tM: EA61NG nsrcnAntr Arm CdT0111 EILVAnD6 91oRN d M PLAN MW TAKDI FRaI A PLAN ruRlmm Irr QNOL n co@@AxD DODtR¢ DA TINS 9Ta Pa W M —T- —TS. IT 6 REOr® TIAT SNS TR.® TTNa M STS 4• WTa � S CLEA M our FWAl PA.m RoAOrAr 9/MAaS i1m00010U1 M DAIATYAI 6 I:NS TmM. 1n PROSm[ ARNNA� SFDrmITArN eASe6 As Dr[CTED Er M SAT l tT. ALI ammmmLn d M LOCK AMTET9® TbTmnT SwLL a vT4m PER M ARNpNO PDmt. Ix Au u®at • s®cNT mITRa 1rA91ss 9tDw d Irss RAW AND LMHSMNtED Y M F1D0 AS DuQCTlO n M fM@®t 91ALI CaEDmr TO M YPGs 'PROlEC1M0 rIA1G (CART M WAIN AREAS BCST YAMAmLOR PRACTa9 F@ YMY30IA'. u DEwTDmm Armpp11 eA9l oR.wc a15a1ARa SHKL a oFTECim ro SE@mFTAIIN BASKS WEIEMJI PO.SdL ALL OSdARa P@l15 SHKL B[ AadAl[LT PROTCCI[D FOlfl [R09a1 f srnw n4tdgt AsE v APPRrnm Ddtl.Y D69P.Tmx colas TA Au sam YASTE/ CalSTRWTIaI Gems sNAU WI DSPOSED a Y AaamANa rM IwG. REDURDCMTS NAEAMD6 wT[RUES 91ALL a sT@m/ o®'osm a a mwAxa rM I�cA RrnRATYf6 t? Ca11RACTOI SMALL USE BARD STAlfILTd ILMW POR WWI 11513 AS N ISMrm M (CURSE OT 1NE Ipml TO wMIAr EOlafrANa rM M OTr Arm lbo[S T —I aDARNNM 1rB YOW SMALL COM515T 6 @FAAliab ML6SSr• ro RAPOLY ST-1E SMALL -D AaAS TO PRESOTr aT 9TE SE@L 0— AE m R, CLNLY rM PDnET aamtoBMS M TIVI wr B[ P'REFan® AI ANY 1DE 01RdG M Cd1RAR AND OIMLG MaMAL fOmdG rO1D6 1109 IIIDIOI Y6I !R m FLA d % MU6 MAT T @YAT MOT BE A T STA YM NOIMK NS.TW 1I T XS ROr SNNL a Wa Y AL> ®AYa MM M Am1lABE WWT ST,ImMm Si ;OF1GTIagM aTARS SNOW M M Purl ArD M rOLLOwlg ir1Ea M FAE STAB u— YC1HW4 Mm WD FOR ml OPUR,T S. MSE rCnm05 wr K raLWCrto AmIPD0NTL @ w D11®luntr. Invmo n: APPL. TYPE 1 w1m1 APL I= ANON@ H¢Trmo Fc APPEr TYP[ T 1RR01 Arm T,a rM TM s HT@AIAK S@ STA-- 1¢tNm A5 Nwtn�aAO sTS..'N "' Km PIAa m TwE Em STAam wm M: coq T@m@ T aE O @T S YM@ a a m R RV M aRATYIT THESE 09@ E6L S DYm — TO M EADNr mTRm BO IlF)A 14. dANa 6 COVFAAa: f@ STOM Surat m5DIM25 FTar fN15TR11CimN PRn[C15 MERE M DRn@ @ OP@Al@ dAr1a5 (LOJAI oomlK a.V1LPD1 SCLLS PONIIa19 a M pl 6 7 D TO vAma6 BUto"I ME MCY fWmt @ @D1Al@ r6i Slmrl A.awr REaSnAWM MTW) DAK a AS911rrf O NSrE lAL CdiRQ 6 M 911 OOOQM@m YDIR[ d irRA P @nd V M 9R . @ d M L[rx MA16(A SATE @ ClASYG d M PR@Glr. 1). IAIDrplK 91E CdIR1 YCASaKS AS !I AS6 SNKL a RE510I5®L i@ PROY@m AMY AXD ALL N[C[SSMY ER090M PLY E AEalaO. aaR® [Of5 91.YL Wrm51 Q BUl MOT a WRIER ro ra ralorMo A STAYTD FMOt LOO — AT G OF Au WIS OtaPT AT CdslrcndperrAI N.ANCL B. SET FD1a d mL W W @Apdi SI@ES iRd CO6IISICIIOM .aA mT FRIES SMNL MAIf M WTRa 0116 M MM SOL M I [OPA[lm G ROtY Cat511LCTd dmANa NA1 I' ro r a[w ROOT NN aAIE>TILL FAmG D. STRET OGNAM' AS YAT S al }p1@ 5>IAED WM1E 1RADdD OCDm. R—AL STYE euRTaols ARC ft I ro YANTAr Eds do sua TM As —AL VAR- /IEaIATMN ARE ESTAB119®. In TmNaACT@ 9141 PRONG • IEYP @ART SmRR]ITAIId B 91 d 91E (@ Cd6ruCMl MASH dl IlSL TDwauRr OAtd STIAU e[ LouTm As ro PRONG [FSr A� F@ @MSTraTnl vr..+,.e APL COM@DE TRUaS A5 rEtis9ARr. 1R. PREY SEDAmITAMI CdrK 6 ro B[ PNO.m@ ro Au STaM YMS GTd 9A9M5 trtaglaR L'a6TRUCiML YFl9S P . A CLAN F. SST YA —TRA mACTlaS f@ YDIQSOTA Aw APR1GTId5 K MPOES PNASF F AS APPN6MAlE F@ BIAS[ 6 C016TAICIId. NORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN S E:HEOULF OF INSTALATION & MAINTENANCE Tml E 1910'Al Yseeer • YAYT. AFTER mallARr -1 FINE PRiart ro COAEMaYEMT AFRA EAd Rd -OFF @ARAa AaA 6 a EMMYICIOI @rRAlla6 Evert. REYaE Sm.LTDLTS aSTm AS aEam+m- R= COST. PRI@ M m T At V aOA ' PON M PAINING D1/RAMa a CMMEOIr OMRAIY)6 MAINTAIN AS rte. ww SYRRmt AFI@ Pam @AWC aSPO. w—I. P ATETIT. STm1CT1AE 6 COfTFICg MANTAM AS NEIOFO. -RAP f @d Cpm1ETYM 6 MSPECI f MAr1 RIP AN w-. AP GRADRIG COL. T 1EAST ArmYLY POMAANT. wTX Ca6T. Alm Alm AIRA rEAVT OIILET pSTALLATd. RbQALL CIOITS R194CT • YAr1AM PfTRLAIQ•lt. TIETCNTmM Pam aMNC [NIl)1EVa w,N lu RAaF OPERATa6 EA4AITS N SEDARTITS AS NII m cT • —AM Mo R[wvK SEm • MAa Arl@ RNLL @AOfw AFIIA r¢Aw RAMS aassAR•. DP@And) RtPLA¢ EIASTI -dt AREAS NORDAtnr. ASST PROTECTING UPd —1 OMTRUCIIdI RIEM 1/3 WAOTY OF AFT@ Im/11TAM APGS AYP 6 REA m ARE RALr a5TOa0 wm- CdiMCI@ 6 R SSU r@ ABIKLITMN, YAMTENA— KID aYOVK a ALL APPACAHE — f SEDYEMT C .M— Fl M ITEMS. i I GAR —o - -- .. .......... i� J I I I /—SILT FENCE I l A�r I IN J ENTRANCE AST THE OF HOME CONSTRUCTION A ( nONAL)REINFORrrEA@/T� ENGINEERING FABRIC METAL OR WOOD POST 00 STATE I FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BAWI L NTH I IEA®T CERTIFY Bur 7115 PLAN SPEMG7101 tR IEPC/tT wA5 Dr ME /R � �L S1 E a 111E TAMPED NATURAL SOIL FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION Tl. .. A•6 INCH NOTE' DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION. HOG RNGS STEEL POSTS WITH TIE TYPICAL INSTALLATION (SECTION &3, MICA'S BEST 6INCH MINIMUM MINIMUM ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH WITH W= OR WOOD POSTS NTH STAMM FOR SILT FENCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES-) A 1 7GRAD I DESIGNED: MBB I IEA®T CERTIFY Bur 7115 PLAN SPEMG7101 tR IEPC/tT wA5 Dr ME /R � �L S1 E a 111E Anderson Engineering of Minnesota LLC FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION C) cz) DIMM UNDERITH LASS A ATE F MNSm PROFESSIONAL dfmam UNDER THE uWS A DULY U roaLSmA ) DRAWN: PRINT PRINT NAME CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING EDINAF MINNESOTA N j DAVE LUCACHICK T"' 17805 Irt AVENUE NORTH, SURE 1W, PLWOUTH, UN 85H1 } CHECKED BY: ,tE SIGNATURE: 47256 DATE MAY 1& 2009 LICENSE TEL (763) 412 -4000 PAX (763) 412 -4090 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS NORTH D 10 SO M SCALE IN FEET LEGEND ------- 902-------- EMIMG CONTOUR - - - - - -- 910-- - - - - -- EXISTING 10 CONTOUR �wA PROPOSED CONTOUR �10— PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR CURB & CUTTER _ _ _ — — — — — _ BLDG f GAR. SETBACK LINE D ! U EASFlm1T UIDE DRAINAGE ARROW ................. SILT FENCE —> ) — EXISTING SAN. SEVER I—,— PROPOSED SAN. SEVER —T T— EXISTING WM —1 -1— PROPOSED WI —I>—>,— EXISTING 5TCl11 SEVER R TREE TO BE REMOVED LO LOOKOUT OPENING omm000mmeme PROPOSED RETAINING WALL NOTES: 1. CONFIRM EMSTING UTILITIES AND TREE LOCATION PRIOR TO FINAL HOUSE DESIGN. 2. FINAL SITE & GRADING PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY CITY. SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES AND SEQUENCING TO BE ADDRESSED AT THAT TIME 3. OWNER TO CONFIRM SIZE AND TYPE OF RETAINING WALL BLOCKS/BOULDERS AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. 4. REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE ACROSS LOT 2 AFTER BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL 5. BENCHMARK TOP NUT OF HYDRANT ELEVATION = 881.90. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DKX NG GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DIAL 811 STAILIWDE PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN 12367 2 of 2 38 40 1 5920 5924 I KELLOGG AVE KELLOGG AVE 5U.0 50.0 1J[.e 132.6 I •,•[• 6,629 v wnvn • n n...... HOOSHANG MEHRALI N -- • -• - - - - -- LOT 7, BLOCK 13 41 5928 KELLOGG AVE 50.D 132.6 8,628 M 6 J GENTRY LOT S. BLOCK 13 4444 5932 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6,627 OEBRORAH RENGWELSKI LOT9,BLOCK13 « 5938 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6,627 A D 6 C A DAMAN LOT 10, BLOCK 13 N 5940 KELLOGG AVE 5010 132.5 8,628 WALTER H OLSON ET AL LOT 11, BLOCK 13 5w KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 SAM SOLVEIG MARIE NORSTOG LOT 12, BLOCK 13 K42 5901 KELLOGG AVE 48.s 134.1 8,5w S 6 C FISHER LOT 24, BLOCK U A� 5905 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,707 JOHN WILLIAM BRANTZ TRUSTEE LOT 23, BLOCK I4 40 5909 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 8,708 GLORIA D LEE LOT 22, BLOCK 14 w 5913 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 8,706 L 8 H BORGEN LOT 21, BLOCK 14 N 5917 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 8,705 N P 8 K B NELSON LOT 20. BLOCK 14 51 1 5921 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6.706 P R KRIDER 8 S J WEGMANN LOT 19, BLOCK 14 62 5925 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 8.703 L A FERRELL ET AL LOT 18, BLOCK 14 53 5928 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 8,703 MARY M BRAUN TRUSTEE LOT 17, BLOCK 14 54 5933 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 131.0 6,702 JAMES D GUISE LOT 18, BLOCK 14 55 5937 KELLOGG AVE 5010 134.0 6,702 TRIO V JUUJARVI EfAL LOT 15, BLOCK 14 KELLOGG AVE 5010 13410 8,701 STACY A BARSHAP LOT 14, BLOCK 14 5945 KELLOGG AVE SOA 13410 8,700 IDELLE J A 8 CARL W SHANNON LOT 13, BLOCK 14 5900 OAKLAWN AVE 48.5 134.1 8,505 J S 8 S M AURA LOT 1, BLOCK 14 5904 OAKLAWN AVE 5010 134.1 6.707 BRUCE J 8 ANNE S PARKER LOT 2, BLOCK H P635961 5908 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6,706 IDEAL APARTMENTS LLC LOT 3, BLOCK 14 5912 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 8,705 P M 6 E B KAISER LOT 4, BLOCK 14 5918 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 8,705 NELLA S ALLEN LOT 5, BLOCK 14 5928 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 8,703 JOHN T ERICSON LOT 8, BLOCK 14 64 5932 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,702 AMY MAUREEN SONDE LOT 9, BLOCK 14 65 5936 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 8,702 R M S 8 J F KELLEY LOT 10, BLOCK 14 68 5940 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 8,701 M H GLEASON 8 R C PENDLETON LOT 11, BLOCK 14 67 5941 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,700 J T 8 D E ARNOLD LOT 12, BLOCK 14 68 6001 WOODDALE AVE 62.6 1325 8.298 S F BRADFORD 8 M S FRANSSEN LOT 21 AND N C 2 OF LOT 23, BLOCI(20 69 6005 WOODDALE AVE 62.0 132.5 8,213 RACHEL SZYMAHSKI N 28 FT OF LOT 22 AND S 3B FT OF LOT 23, BLOCK 20 70 6000 KELLOGG AVE 46.6 132.5 81473 N L DUIN 8 C L MIAGOZ VMIN LOT 1, BLOCK 20 71 6004 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6.624 JESSE MARTIN LOT 2, BLOCK 20 72 6008 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.7 SAM S R BREIDENBACH LOT 3, BLOCK 20 73 6001 KELLOGG AVE 48.5 134.0 6,501 PATRICK S CONLON LOT 24. BLOCK 19 74 6005 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,699 D Y W CHEUNG 6 F M TRICE LOT 23, BLOCK 19 75 6009 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,699 DIANE J HUBBARD TRUSTEE LOT 22. BLOCK 19 76 6013 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,698 MK34AEL R LARSEN LOT 21, BLOCK 19 77 6000 OAKLAWN AVE 48.5 134.0 6,497 J B A A A YUHAS LOT 1, BLOCK 19 78 6004 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6.699 KYOO IL KIM 8 SAET BYUL PARK LOT 2, BLOCK 19 79 6008 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,698 DANIEL 8 IL LUANNE KURA LOT 3, BLOCK 19 80 6012 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6.698 L B 8 J M ANDERSON LOT 4, BLOCK 19 MEAN 52.7 133.1 7.037 - All Legal DmviPti ere Oie plat d FAIRFAX, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA' MEDIAN 50.0 134.0 6,699 12357 ANALYSIS J i i i 500 FOOT NEIGHBORHOOD MAP q � 1 1 4 511 M �i• ' MI r t✓�NN - 48 w w « w 14r t+N 1. a s w w w 4444 M 66tH N � M « N Q 4e N N p w w. 1M a N w am - l w- - w r d N A� e4W m � N 40 ® s I47 tt� w w am 10 d 1s 4� N M « 11110 ft e4ao es M - p r O/ 4 w M ( M M + `w M � rsaL: 70 71 s w • � ! .�N 3 N W E S w 48 � w � w 14r t+N a s w .« M N � tt44I N Q 4e N w 44w a e am - l w- - w r w M e4W � « M ® I47 w w am d N N M 11110 v v M - rsaL: 70 71 s w • � ! .�N 3 N W E S w n � 44� � w 46f t+N s � - - --9 *am. x - q%' s In OM ♦♦ 7 r4 M I 1 _ •� I 1 1 \L F -- - - - t - - - - I - - -�� I I I F- - -- -mot J - -- � ��{, - - --•1 t 1 I I • I 1- e t - - - - -- -� H I : I �� __ -7� I I �� I • t- - - - - t - - - - - -� - I y - - - -J, L -� - -J �dNl - C r - T - _ - - •� _ - _ '� I I •� i F - - - - + - - • le -4 • - -50D FT RAM I I • �' I 0 100 200 300 500 SCALE IN FEET Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G A N D L A N D S U R V E Y I N G 13805 13T AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 100, PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 TEL (783) 412 -4000 FAX (783) 412 -4090 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VLA From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Receive 2008 CAFR ® Motion Action ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Recommend receipt of 2008 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). James Eichten, CPA, from Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A., the Principal in charge of the audit, will be present at the meeting to present the CAFR and Management Report. Info /Background: Attached is the following: Independent Auditors' Management Report Independent Auditors' Special Purpose Audit Reports 2008 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Independent Auditors' Management Report is a report by the auditors to communicate information relevant to city finances and to provide comments resulting from their audit process. The Independent Auditor's Special Purpose Audit Reports is the result of the extensive audit performed to assess the City's internal controls and to assure compliance with all of the State's and Federal Government's statutes, laws and regulations. The auditors this year did not find any occurrences where the City did not comply with State statutes and Federal laws and regulations. The auditors also did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that they consider to be material weaknesses. The 2008 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is the accumulation of all Finance functions compiled in a format prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, The State of Minnesota, and The Federal Government. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report consists of a number of sections: The Introductory Section has a letter from the Finance Director, a listing of elected and appointed officials and an organization chart. The Financial Section includes the Auditors' Opinion and Management's Discussion and Analysis letter. The Basic Financial Statements is the part of the report that details the 2008 accounting for the City, as well as the notes to the financial statements. The Required Supplementary Information includes the budgetary comparison schedule for the General Fund along with the related notes. The Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules are the financial statements for the non -major funds. The Supplementary Financial Information includes various schedules of debt and assessed valuation. The Statistical Section has a number of schedules again required by the above mentioned boards and governments. PJ R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 1 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323423 6/1812009 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. T 212.87 HOSE, CLAMPS 00001014 213401 1- 813672 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 212.87 323424 611812009 100716 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 157.00 COBRA ADMIN 213897 009663 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 683.90 FLEX SPENDING ACCT ADMIN 213898 009685 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 840.90 323425 6/18/2009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 31.60 213532 0802365 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 58.40 213533 0722228 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 69.40 213534 0802366 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 68.00 213535 0802380 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 63.80 213910 0722268 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 74.40 213911 0802384 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 365.60 323426 6/18/2009 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 146.61 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 213815 6694 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 640.60 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 213816 6670 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 787.21 323427 611812009 102872 ADAMS GOLF 483.67 MERCHANDISE 213670 91145549 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 379.53 MERCHANDISE 213671 91145550 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 104.00- MERCHANDISE 213672 91167945 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES' 759.20 323428 6/18/2009 112033 ALLDATA 1,603.50 DATA SUBSCRIPTION 00001248 213625 FW270363 -2009 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,603.50 323429 6/18/2009 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 37,077.90 RECYCLING 213402 1791345 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 37,077.90 323430 6/1812009 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 195.13 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 213460 ALERTINV11668 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 195.13 323431 611812009 118171 AMERICAN PRESSURE INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 2 6118/2009 — 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 118.40 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 213899 57164 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 118.40 323432 6/18/2009 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 11,202.04 PAGERS 00003523 213673 9719 1470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,115.00 BATTERIES 00001010 213674 9778 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,317.04 . 323433 611812009 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 795.97 FOOD 213675 1167355 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 17.50- CREDIT 213676 1164713 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 778.47 323434 611812009 103065 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 288.20 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001089 213403 30402 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 288.20 323435 611812009 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 45.92 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001040 213404 31054 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 45.92 323436 6118/2009 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 11,527.47 INSTALL POOL GRATES 213677 34142 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 11,527.47 323437 611812009 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 198.74 1- 146354 WASTE DISPOSAL 213461 JUN0109 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 198.74 323438 6118/2009 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 48.56 213678 870517029X6209 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 48.56 323439 6/1812009 120995 AVR INC. 354.00 CONCRETE 00005013 213817 20213 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 531.00 CONCRETE 00005013 213818 20373 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 649.00 CONCRETE 00005013 213819 20525 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,534.00 323440 6/1812009 100638 BACHMAN'S 277.97 MULCH, TREEGATORS 00006488 213405 11426 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 277.97 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 `7:40:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 - - 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No: Account No Subledger Account Description- Business Unit 323441 ' 6118/2009 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 13,002.65 HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE SURVEY 213406 23271040.00 -1 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 13, 002.65 323442 6/18/2009 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 911.67 BATTERIES 00001200 213626 . C9450 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 911'.67 323443 611812009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,692.02 213536 49219200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,321.73 213537 49198000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 265.55 213538 49219700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 414.10 213539 49219300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON.SELLING 41.00 213540 49148900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS,SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 289.35 213540 49148900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING' _ 204.44 213541 5814000 5862:5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7.53 213542 82288800 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 57.39 213543 - 82316600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX .'YORK SELLING 144.34 213544 82316500 5862.5515 COST OF. GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING ` 111.10 213912 49311700 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,548.55 323444 6118/2009 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/30/09 213814 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323445 611812009 100648' <BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS - " 64.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 213407 WO- 564676 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK'ADMIN. GENERAL 3.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES. 213408 OE- 196849 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK`ADMIN. GENERAL 108.63 PENS AND PADS 213409 WO- 564360 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 31.92 ENVELOPES, 213410 WO- 564410 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES" CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ` 888.41 FOLDING MACHINE 213411 WO- 564729 -1 1550.6406 _ GENERAL SUPPLIES .CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL `- 10.96 LABELS 213412 " WO- 564821 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 72.57; OFFICE SUPPLIES 213462 OE- 196233 -1 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 28.33 TAPE CARTRIDGE 213627 WO- 564633 -1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 156.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 213679 OE- 195536 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,366.54 323446 6118/2009 101691 BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 235.05 GRIPS 213680 24265 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 235.05 R55CKREG LOG20000 16,227.00 PROSECUTING CITY OF EDINA 41002 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES Council Check Register 16,227.00 6118/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323447 6/18/2009 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 2,459.72 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003535 37.26 TOILET SERVICE 213681 16060 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 69.94 TOILET SERVICE 213682 16059 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 69.94 TOILET SERVICE 213683 16058 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 177.14 323448 6/18/2009 101440 BOLKS, JEFFREY LENS 00001198 213685 303700 6/1712009 7:40:29 Page - 4 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 62.89 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT 213820 061209 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 62.89 323449 6/18/2009 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 200.00 323456 6/18/2009 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 388.41 MERCHANDISE 213687 917561145 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 220.74 MERCHANDISE 213688 917574073 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL F - 'S 16,227.00 PROSECUTING 213821 41002 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 16,227.00 323450 6/1812009 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,459.72 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003535 213684 87067009 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,459.72 323451 6/18/2009 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 4.36 LENS 00001198 213685 303700 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.36 323452 6/1812009 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 126.36 CANDY 213686 2340:018034 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 126.36 323453 6/18/2009 103279 BRETSON, GREG 89.22 UNIFORM PURCHASE 213413 060809 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 89.22 323454 611812009 116164 BRINDLE, DOROTHY 65.18 OUTDOOR FLOWERS 213794 060809 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 65.18 323455 6/1812009 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6/23/09 213807 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 323456 6/18/2009 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 388.41 MERCHANDISE 213687 917561145 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 220.74 MERCHANDISE 213688 917574073 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL F - 'S R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - Account No Subledger Account Description 609.15 323457 6/1812009 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 8 998 37 LEGAL' 213628 2851G -5/09 1195.6131 4 6117/2009 7:40129 Page - 5 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD; MIX 8,998.37 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 323458 611812009 YORK SELLING 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM _ 27.45 5310.6406 213545 15216 723.55 46001.6710 213546 15215 5822.5513. COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE,_ 5,702.95 1553.6530 213547 15214 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 82.35 4090.4751 213548 15213 - 6,536.30 •. 323459 611812609 121206 CARNEY, DONNA 34.00 TENNIS LESSONS REFUND 213798 060809 34.00 323460 611812009 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 47.00 CREDIT CARD PAPER 213463 060409 47.00 323461. 6118/2009 ;, 112811 CASTREJON INC. 4t, 60,000.00 FIBER OPTIC °INSTALLATION 213689 10869 60,000.00 323462 611812.0.09 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE -- 120.00 213549 82353 126.00 323463 611812009 100681 CATCO 13.57 VENT PLUG 00001203 213622 - 3 -74060 t 3.57 323464 6/1812009 103079 CEDAR SMALL ENGINE INC. 9.83 OIL CAP ASSEMBLY. 00005475 213629 22994 9.83 323465 611812009 124404 CEDES CORP OF AMERICA 120.00 PARKING PERMITS REFUND 213900 061509 120.00 - 323466 611812009 123998 CELEBRATION BRASS 4 6117/2009 7:40129 Page - 5 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD; MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM _ PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING' 5822.5513. COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE,_ SOTH ST SELLING 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH &F14ANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/18/2009 - 6118/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/22/09 213805 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323467 6/1812009 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10.47 213630 060209 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 11.08 213630 060209 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 22.87 213630 060209 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 57.27 213630 060209 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 65.07 213630 060209 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 74.58 213630 060209 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 94.17 213630 060209 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 247.98 213630 060209 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 324.39 213630 060209 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 417.94 213630 060209 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 545.16 213630 060209 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 768.15 213630 060209 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 1,110.62 213630 060209 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 1,328.95 213630 060209 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,137.36 213630 060209 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 6,571.35 213630 060209 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 14,787.41 323468 6118/2009 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 826.39 213690 1815172 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 887.82 213691 1811662 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,150.43 213692 1811672 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 2,864.64 323469 611812009 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 2,725.34 WATER TREATMENT 00008098 213693 515282 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,725.34 323470 6118/2009 106402 CHURCHILL, LEE 48.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213788 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 505.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213788 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 553.00 323471 6/18/2009 124263 CINCINNATUS INC. 500.00 COUNCIL RETREAT CONSULTANT 213414 7729 1100.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL 500.00 323472 6' -19 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON R55CKREG; LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 8949.42 LAB SERVICES 213823 061109 5915.6136 5932.6185 1554.6103 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Pege = 7 -. Subledger. _Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5440.5511 8,949.42 _- 5620.6230 323473 611812009 EDINBOROUGH PARK 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 144.59 ELECTRICAL BILLING VERNON SELLING 00001277 213694. 4083 1646.6406 144.59 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1553.6406 323474 6118/2009 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105693 CITYSPRINT GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE .115.83 LOGIS COURIER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6045 213415 15235 1646.6610 115.83 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 323475 611812009 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF 17.46 MERCHANDISE 00006148 213695 2918341SO 17.46 ; 323476 611812009 120433 COMCAST e' 22.60 8772 10 614 0220686 213696 060209 22.60 323477 6/1812009 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 698.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 213631 MAY09 698.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 213631 MAY09 698.34 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 213631 MAY09 2,095.00 323478 6/18/2009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 114.40 " GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001085 213464 03472692 114.40 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001085 213464 03472692 114.40 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001085 213464 03472692 114.40 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001085 213464 03472692 114.40 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001085 213464 03472692 36.65 SAFETY TAPE 00001692 213465 03473047 608.65 323479 6/18/2009 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL 270.92 WORKERS COMP 213901 1397677 1,479.08 WORKERS COMP 213901 1397677 1,744.00 323480 8/1812009 122376 CORPORATE CONNECTION 200.00 SAFETY VESTS 00001592 213697 1592 472.46 SAFETY rVESTS 00001592 213697 1592 5932.6185 1554.6103 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Pege = 7 -. Subledger. _Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1400.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE a R55CKREG LOG20000 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6128/09 CITY OF EDINA , 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 114.09855685 -4 WATER 213698 472.47 SAFETY VESTS 00001592 213697 1592 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 17.69 1,144.93 323485 323481 611812009 101951 CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC 103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC. 43.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001249 213416 95573671 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 376.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001249 213416 95573671 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 419.88 611812009 124387 CYCLONE UGHTING INC. 323482 6118/2009 119899 CREEKSIDE SOILS 26,000.00 LIGHT POLES 00005311 213632 11142 4090.6530 1,816.41 GOLD MULCH 00005990 213417 49550.19167 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 1,816.41 323487 611812009 323483 611812009 121164 CROMULENT SHAKESPEARE COMPANY 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page- 8 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION TREES & MAINTENANCE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6128/09 213810 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323484 611812009 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 17.69 114.09855685 -4 WATER 213698 322145 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 17.69 323485 611812009 101951 CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC 275.53 FREEZER REPAIR 213699 2970 -35858 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 275.53 323486 611812009 124387 CYCLONE UGHTING INC. 26,000.00 LIGHT POLES 00005311 213632 11142 4090.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 26,000.00 323487 611812009 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 3,795.66 1" WATER METERS 00001273 213418 6075829 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 3,795.66 323488 6/1812009 104020 DALCO 198.73 GLASS CLEANER, NAIL BRUSHES 00001054 213466 2102602 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 94.79 TIRE CONDITIONER 00001054 213633 2103061 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 253.68 INSECTICIDE 00001054 213634 2103064 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93.72 GLASS CLEANER 00001110 213824 2104456 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119.28 SOAP 00001054 213825 2104342 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 760.20 323489 6/1812009 102285 DAVANNIS 127.72 CITIZEN'S ACADEMY MEAL 5/10/09 213826 051009 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GEN' 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 9 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 645.02 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER R55CKREG LOG20000 323490 6/1812009 VERNON SELLING 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 Council Check Register 4,320.00 213550 507367 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 104.78 IN SERVICE TRAINING MEAL 213827 191745 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 206.26 IN SERVICE TRAINING MEAL 213828 191750 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 206.26 IN SERVICE TRAINING MEAL 213829 191751 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 9 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 645.02 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 323490 6/1812009 VERNON SELLING 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,320.00 213550 507367 4,666.13 213551 507554 600.00 213552 507132 2,224.03 213553 507553 668.00 213913 507465 12,478.16 323491 6/18/2009 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 84.83 HOSE REEL 00001116 213700 392156 84.83 323492 6/1812009 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 127.50 BAKERY 213701 302904 68.25 BAKERY 213702 302935 43.17 BAKERY 213703 303053 93.59 BAKERY 213704 303054 332.51 323493 611812009 119851 DIEKMAN, BETHANY 295.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEAN UP 213799 061209 295.00 323494 6/1812009 119850 DIEKMAN, MARLENE 355.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEAN UP 213800 061209 355.00 323495 611812009 123162 DISH NETWORK 38.34 213705 060409 38.34 323496 6/1812009 122199 DOLL, MARTY 10.68 MEDIA 213635 060909 125.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 213635 060909 136.08 323497 611812009 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 9 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1346.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 1346.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 2210.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/1812009 — 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,158.71 CAUSTIC SODA 213467 82700782 -09 5311.6545 CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GRILL ALARM SERVICE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,158.71 323498 6118/2009 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 156.56 VINYL GUARD 00006253 213419 0087272 -IN 5422.6406 156.56 323499 611812009 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,008.52 MERCHANDISE 00006098 213706 415466 5440.5511 39.05 MERCHANDISE 00006098 213707 415159 5440.5511 1,047.57 323500 6/1812009 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 225.78 MAY CAR WASHES 213830 3839 1553.6238 225.78 323501 611812009 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 372.00 WINE 00006338 213708 104 5421.5513 372.00 323502 6118/2009 103594 EDINALARM INC. 178.92 ALARM MONITORING 213420 54459 5422.6250 196.77 ALARM REPAIR 213421 54277 5422.6180 375.69 323503 6118/2009 118010 EGAN, BILL 293.56 BEAVER CONTROL 00001162 213422 060309 5933.6103 293.56 323504 611812009 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 12.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213787 061209 4077.6103 757.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213787 061209 4077.6103 769.50 323505 6/18/2009 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 1,392.69 E -81 REPAIRS 213709 41751 1470.6180 1,392.69 323506 611812009 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 131.54 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003815 213710 INV1178206 1470.6510 131.54 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GRILL ALARM SERVICE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP REPAIR PARTS SERVICES CUSTODIANS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page- 11 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECYCLING LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323507 611812009 116303 ETONIC WORLDWIDE LLC 822.78 MERCHANDISE 00006139 213711 143003 5440.5511 822.78 323508 6118/2009 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 43.67 FASTENERS 00001195 213831 MNSTU27378 1553.6530 43.67 323509 611812009 105420 FIKES SERVICES 39.41 AIR DEODORIZERS 213712 59991 5841.6162 39.41 323510 6/1812009 124255 FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONM 1,040.94 RECYCLING SERVICES PLANNING 213636 12537 5952.6103 1,040.94 323511 6/18/2009 100764 G & K SERVICES 73.68 213637 053109 5511.6201 262.90 213637 053109 5913.6201 594.31 213637 053109 1552.6511 679.10 213637 053109 1646.6201 748.31 213637 053109 1553.6201 786.81 213637 053109 1301.6201 3,145.11 323512 6118/2009 123080 GARDEN VIEW GREENHOUSE 729.53 ANNUALS 00002042 213832 396321 5630.6620 922.32 MIXED PLANTERS 00006492 213902 396326 5422.6541 1,156.10 BASKETS, ANNUALS 00006039 213903 396327 5422.6541 1,133.85 ANNUALS 00006293 213904 396328 5422.6541 3,941.80 323513 611812009 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 345.29 CUNO WATER FILTERS 00006275 213713 1128969 5420.6530 441.45 GRILL RADIANTS 00006275 213714 1130026 5420.6530 786.74 323514 611812009 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 9.48 AUTO PARTS 213638 053109 5422.6530 1,283.52 AUTO PARTS 213638 053109 1553.6530 1,293.00 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP REPAIR PARTS SERVICES CUSTODIANS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page- 11 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECYCLING LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS Council Check Register GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323515 6/1812009 102658 GLEWWE DOORS INC. 383.54 KICK DOWN DOOR HOLDERS 213833 145397 5311.6406 383.54 323516 611812009 119936 GLOBAL OAK 56.25 ART CENTER E- COMMERCE 213715 010619 5110.6103 56.25 BRAEMAR ONLINE REGISTRATION 213715 010619 5410.6103 225.00 PARK 8 REC E- COMMERCE 213715 010619 1627.6103 231.25 EDINA LIQUOR UNCORKED 213715 010619 5840.6103 231.25 EDINA LIQUOR UNCORKED 213715 010619 5860.6103 231.25 EDINA LIQUOR UNCORKED 213715 010619 5820.6103 375.00 AQUATIC CTR E- COMMERCE 213715 010619 5310.6103 4,181.25 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 213715 010619 2210.6406 5,587.50 323517 6/18/2009 124394 GOETZMANN, RACHEL 108.00 SUMMER LESSON REFUND 213797 060909 5511.6136 108.00 323518 6/1812009 101166 GOPHER SIGN CO. 1,874.40 TRAFFIC CONES, POSTS 00005938 213639 79085 1343.6533 1,874.40 323519 611812009 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,423.90 MAY SERVICE 00005738 213468 9050469 5913.6103 1,423.90 323520 6/18/2009 101103 GRAINGER 308.65 GLOVES, LIGHTS 00006291 213423 9904129955 5422.6406 124.62 TRAILER HITCH BALLS, GLOVES 00006289 213424 9902401711 5422.6406 147.91 SCREWS, NUTS, WASHERS 00005779 213425 9005874087 1553.6530 19.40 ROD END 00001011 213426 9006380027 1553.6530 71.17- CREDIT 00005777 213427 9007011647 1553.6530 25.77- CREDIT 00005777 213428 9007011639 1553.6530 84.16 MARKING PAINT 00001081 213469 9004876851 1322.6406 98.02 TOILET REPAIR KITS 00006289 213716 9006380019 5420.6530 6h5.82 323521 6/18/2009 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 384.50 213914 110718 5862.5513 384.50 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6117/2009 7:40:29 Page - 12 Business Unit POOL OPERATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL ACTIVITIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GUARD RAIL MATERIAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/18/2009 — 6/1812009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323522 6/18/2009 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 237.94 GRIPS 00006208 213717 39738 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 237.94 323523 6/18/2009 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 13,027.39 GAS 00001437 213640 S010014055 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13,027.39 323524 6118/2009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 7,629.90 CHEMICALS 00005451 213470 3026258 5913.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 4,578.55 CHEMICALS 00005451 213834 3027487 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 12,208.45 323525 6118/2009 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 18,004.84 PREMIUM 213905 32352069 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 177,735.67 PREMIUM 213906 32353651 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 195,740.51 323526 611812009 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 1,022.30 RETAINING WALL 00001071 213471 667466 1344.6577 LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 1,022.30 323527 6/1812009 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 215.04 MEAT PATTIES 213718 021823 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 215.04 323528 6118/2009 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 160.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00001252 213719 29058181 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.79 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 213720 29056285 -125 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,824.05 RADIO ADMIN FEE 213835 29058119 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 174.00 SILS /CAL SUPPORT 213836 29056285 -126 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,254.84 323529 6/1812009 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 526.84 ACUITY CHAIR 213837 432221 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 526.84 323530 611812009 114507 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 274.77 RIVER ROCK 00001281 213838 069006 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 274.77 323631 611812009 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 238.15 MOPS, SANITIZER 00002250 213721 2899680 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 238.15 323532 611812009 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 125.00 PERFORMANCE 6/23/09 213806 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 125.00 323533 611812009 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 797.15 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005510 213429 83559 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 797.15 323534 6118/2009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 521.50 213915 488711 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 722.26 213916 488710 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,243.76 323535 611812009 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 577.39 CHLORINE 00002243 213722 9052105 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 577.39 323536 611812009 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 24.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213789 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 202.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213789 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 226.00 323537 6/1812009 100812 lAAO 61.66 TEXTBOOK 213839 061509 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 61.66 323538 611812009 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 38.16 PHONE BOOK LISTING 213641 390014908892 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 38.16 PHONE BOOK LISTING 213641 390014908892 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 38.18 PHONE BOOK LISTING 213641 390014908892 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 114.50 323539 6/18/2009 100409 IN- CONTROL INC. 375.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 00005729 213723 09014DB01 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT 375.00 323540 6/18/2009 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 200.28 PLASTIC TUBING 00001107 213724 566411 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL PUMPS 200.28 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/18/2009 - 6118/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 323541 6/18/2009 57.32 1,738.95 1,738.95 1,738.95 5,274.17 323542 6118/2009 323543 6/1812009 323545 6118/2009 101761 [VERSON, KATHRYN CHEMICAL HEALTH EDUCATION CHEMICAL HEALTH EDUCATION CHEMICAL HEALTH EDUCATION CHEMICAL HEALTH EDUCATION PO # Doc No Inv No 213840 061109 213840 061109 213840 061109 213840 061109 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 456.61 BULBS 00001101 213472 4226826 -01 456.61 Account No Subledger Account Description 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS Business Unit 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 140.00 213554 948573 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 482.00 213555 1284855 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 67.50 213556 1269130 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 98.40 213557 1284817 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 99.00 213725 1285450 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 119.00 213726 1281560 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 240.00 213917 1269153 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17.55 213918 1284872 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,128.25 213919 1284871 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,289.50 213920 1269160 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,813.40 213921 1284881 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14,494.60 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,160.00 213558 1638218 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 375.16 213559 1641590 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,156.88 213560 1641591 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 472,77 213561 1641592 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 231.12 213562 1641593 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,045.74 213563 1641594 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 210.51 213564 1642836 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112,61- 213565 421483 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 386.51 213922 1645637 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 309.00 213923 1645638 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 62.74 213924 1645641 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 287.32 213925 1645640 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 36.11 213926 1645642 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 330.08 213927 1645639 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,338.60 213928 1638216 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/18/2009 - 6118/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 406.16 213929 1645865 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 178.24 213930 1645646 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 213931 1645643 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,978.48 213932 1645651 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,251.97 213933 1645654 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,064.31 213934 1645653 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,732.26 213935 1645656 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 99.12 213936 1645652 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 35.37 213937 1645658 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 880.15 213938 1645655 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,068.66 213939 1645657 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.12 213940 1645645 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 23,986.89 323546 6118/2009 120296 KAASA, GUNNAR 1,284.52 TRAINING EXPENSES 213430 060809 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,284.52 323547 6/1812009 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 287.07 MOTOR BEARINGS 00001079 213727 0543052 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 251.07 MOTOR BEARINGS 00001079 213728 0869566 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 538.14 323548 6118/2009 100553 KEEHR, GREGORY 103.93 CUPS 213907 061209 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 103.93 323549 6/18/2009 111018 KEEPRS INC. 389.97 UNIFORMS 00003506 213729 117693 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 184.95 UNIFORMS 00003508 213730 118014 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 389.97 UNIFORMS 00003507 213731 118090 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.99 UNIFORMS 00003510 213732 118567 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 147.96 UNIFORMS 00003509 213733 118609.03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.99 UNIFORMS 00003532 213734 119331 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.96 UNIFORMS 00003510 213735 118567 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 128.98 UNIFORMS 00003530 213736 119442 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 389.97 UNIFORMS 00003508 213737 118014 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 147.96 UNIFORMS 00003532 213738 119331 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.99 UNIFORMS 00003536 213739 119092 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,379.69 323650 6/' 19 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 17 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 I U' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Bus ness n t 446.79 MERCHANDISE 213740 2499470 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 446.79 323551 6/18/2009 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 158.00 MAY SERVICE 213741 050109 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 158.00 323552 6118/2009 124386 KRETZMAN, KIMBERLY 600.00 DRIVEWAY DAMAGE 213642 060909 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 600.00 323553 611812009 124389 LAMAR, ADDIE 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 213643 061009 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 323554 6118/2009 122700 LARSON, DAN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/29109 213812 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323555 6/18/2009 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 155.74 HEX NUTS, CLEVIS HOOKS 00001103 213841 8147302 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 155.74 323556 611812009 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 553.24 SAND 00006206 213431 200720 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 986.08 TOPDRESSING 00006206 213432 200703 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,539.32 323557 611812009 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 1,061.00 LIFE VESTS 213473 118626 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,061.00 323558 611812009 105922 LORENSON, JEFF 101.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213786 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 101.00 323559 6118/2009 123848 LOW VOLTAGE CONTRACTORS 73.25 ELECTRIC HORN 213742 SIL -30934 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 73.25 323560 611812009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 667.26 213566 63227 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,230.82 124252 MAD DOG CONSTRUCTION INC. 1,898.08 ARENA ADMINISTRATION 323561 6118/2009 114593 MAAP 20.00 CONFERENCE AND DUES 150.00 CONFERENCE AND DUES 170.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 213941 63290 58415515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 213644 060909 213644 060909 323562 6/1812009 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT 124252 MAD DOG CONSTRUCTION INC. PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ED ADMINISTRATION 1,198.13 ROCK 00001285 213842 4290 1,198.13 323563 6/1812009 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 46.86 213433 053109 166.14 213433 053109 457.97 213433 053109 619.78 213433 053109 811.20 213433 053109 1,084.09 213433 053109 3,186.04 323564 611812009 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 500.00 2008 AUDIT 213843 24584 1,000.00 2008 AUDIT 213843 24584 1,500.00 2008 AUDIT 213843 24584 1,500.00 2008 AUDIT 213843 24584 2,000.00 2008 AUDIT 213843 24584 6,500.00 323565 611812009 100868 MARK VII SALES 71.00 213567 474391 3,935.16 213568 474390 160.00 213569 471803 100.00 213570 474674 110.00 213571 474673 1,807.00 213572 474672 3,761.65 213573 475232 100.00 213574 475233 71.00 213575 475235 303.40 213743 456960 2,300.05 213942 477181 100.00 213943 476940 1190.6105 1190.6104 5932.6406 5620.6406 1646.6543 5913.6406 5630.6406 1301.6406 1301.6556 5910.6130 1160.6130 5510.6130 5610.6130 5932.6130 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5515 5430.5514 5842.5514 5822.5515 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 18 Business Unit YORK SELLING ASSESSING ASSESSING GENERAL STORM SEWER EDINBOROUGH PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT GENERAL (BILLING) PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT FINANCE PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 71.80 213944 476939 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING - 1,910.50 213945 476938, 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,545.20 213946 473447 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16,346.76 - -- 323566 6/1812009 102197.MCFOA 35.00 MEMBERSHIP - JANE TIMM 213645 061109 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION = 35.017 323567 611812009 102318 MECA _ 60.00 WORKSHOP 00005858 213439 7113 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 60.00 323668 6/1812009 101483 MENARDS _ 10.31 BRACKETS, BOLTS, MAT 00001070 213434 43423 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 76.78 SPRINKLER, SPRAYER 00008004 213744 . 45611 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 20.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 00008097 213745 45613 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 15.69 RUST REMOVER, BRUSH 00006291. 213,746 46458 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 123.28 323569 611812009 101987 MENARDS 49.60 'BUG SPRAY 00002032 213844 88051 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES - 21.24 - RETURN 213845 87868 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 85.75 GLOVES, SPRAYERS 00002032 213846 87877 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 180.20 CEDAR, WIRE, ADHESIVE 00002032 213847 87764 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES '. 294.31 323570 6/1812009 102281 MENARDS 9.33 EMITTER. 00005986-213435 92419 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9.33. 323571 6118/2009 122510 MERCHANTS OF GOLF 695.84 PUTTERS 00002022 213848 66099 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 695.84 - 323572 611812009 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 229.83 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001069 213436 116042 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE _ 162.41 BACK STOP TARP 00005811 213437 116141 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 44.41 PLAYGROUND BALLS 213849 116034 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 436.65 323573 6/1812009 124204" METSA, PAUL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 300.00 TALENT FEE 6/11109 213747 061109 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING BLACKTOP GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6/1712009 7:40:29 Page - 20 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 300.00 323574 6118/2009 104650 MICRO CENTER 22.14 BATTERIES FOR LABEL MAKER 00004487 213438 2252487 1554.6406 37.27 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00003135 213850 2265344 1400.6160 59.41 323575 6/18/2009 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 206.29 ASPHALT 00005445 213474 99135MB 1301.6518 206.29 323576 611812009 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 572.70 GAS 00006204 213646 44931 5422.6581 368.52 GAS 00006204 213647 44930 5424.6406 348.25 DIESEL 00006205 213648 44932 5422.6581 1,289.47 323577 6/18/2009 114562 MILLS ENGINEERING CO. 530.10 WASTE RECEPTACLE LOGOS 213475 13360 5311.6406 530.10 323578 611812009 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 660.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001279 213748 33431 5913.6180 1,540.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001278 213749 33429 5913.6180 2,200.00 323579 611812009 124371 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 70.00 NEGOTIATOR CONFERENCE 213852 061109 1400.6104 70.00 323580 6/1812009 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 00002041 213851 50026-2009 5631.6105 35.00 323681 611812009 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 342.00 GHIN FEES 213750 45- 150 - 13/5/09 5401.4603 50.00 GHIN FEES 213751 45- 150- 21/5/09 5401.4603 5,548.00 GHIN FEES 213752 45- 150 - 16/6/09 5401.4603 5,940.00 323582 6/"'-M9 rl9 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING BLACKTOP GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6/1712009 7:40:29 Page - 20 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/1812009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.00 LEADERSHIP REGISTRATION 213753 6298 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 60.00 323583 6/18/2009 101144 MINNESOTA UI FUND 11,592.88 FIRST QUARTER 213649 5378150 1550.6046 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 11,592.88 323584 611812009 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 48.88 BALL VALVE, PIPE, TIP 00005760 213754 0080565 -IN 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,455.93 SPRAYER 00002026 213853 0080673 -IN 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 3,504.81 323585 6/1812009 117459 MN METRO EWGA 125.00 MEMBERSHIP 213755 BRAEMAR GC 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 125.00 323586 - 6118/2009 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 PERFORMANCE 6125/09 213809 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 323587 611812009 102395 M6SE, WILLIAM 42.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213790 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 530.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213790 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 572.25 323588 611812009 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 43.40 WHEEL BEARINGS 00006484 213440 669055 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,487.31 FERTILIZER 00006946 213441 674001 -00 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,530.71 323589 611812009 105323 MTM RECOGNITION 4,231.60 AWARDS 213908 5424126 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 4,231.60 323590 611812009 103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 214.06 GOLF RULES BOOKS 00006286 213756 89109 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 214.06 323591 611812009 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 538.50 213576 55070 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 669.50 213947 55071 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 668.00 213948 55069 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG .LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5410.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1553.6530 5631.6136 5310.6103 1495.6103 1495.6103 4402.6710 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 22 Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 53.76 INK PAPER 1,876.00 476283956 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 323592 6/18/2009 CORDS 104350 NIKE USA INC. 476106227 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 264.51 STAFF SHIRTS 213757 921566007 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 116.88 MERCHANDISE 213758 920952633 476106902 -001 5410.6513 756.86 'MERCHANDISE 213759 920920104 655.47 MERCHANDISE 213760 920920103 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 1,793.72 323593 6/1812009 00005999 213443 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 86.18 STEEL 00001016 213854 149363 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 86.18 1.52 ALUM OVAL SLEEVES 00001096 213478 323594 6/18/2009 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 80.00 CROWBARS 00005428 213765 552051 75.00 PERFORMANCE 6/21/09 213804 061209 75.00 323595 6/18/2009 105575 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO. INC 317.58 SAFETY REMINDER CARDS, AD WORK 213476 23056 317.58 323596 6118/2009 116114 OCE 181.25 JUNE MAINTENANCE 213650 986829979 170.19 MAY MAINTENANCE 213651 986805068 351.44 323597 6/18/2009 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 110,185.00 PROGRESS ON PW FACILITY 213442 053109 110,185.00 323598 6/18/2009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 5410.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1553.6530 5631.6136 5310.6103 1495.6103 1495.6103 4402.6710 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 22 Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 53.76 INK PAPER 213761 476283956 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 11.69 CORDS 213762 476106227 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 35.12 PAPER 213763 476634871 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 21.84 PAPER 213764 476106902 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 122.41 323599 6/18/2009 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 56.99 SLEEVES, VINYL COATED CHAIN 00005999 213443 55266.1 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 67.48 SHEAVE GABLE, ROPE 213477 552723 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1.52 ALUM OVAL SLEEVES 00001096 213478 552878 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 80.00 CROWBARS 00005428 213765 552051 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERF" GEN Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 23 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS POOL OPERATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/1812009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 534.70 RATCHET BINDERS, HOOKS 00005428 213765 552051 5923.6406 72.35 CARABINERS 00007119 213855 553008 5311.6406 813.04 323600 6/1812009 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 213856 28106 5630.6230 720.75 323601 .611812009 101718 PARTS PLUS 679.90 AUTO PARTS 213652 053109 1553.6530 679.90 323602 6/1812009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 655.28 213577 8224804 -IN 5822.5513 3,345.96 213949 8224805 -IN 5862.5513 730.70 213950 8224474 -IN 5862.5513 2,366.22 213951 8224795 -IN 5842.5513 31.00 213952 8224808 -IN 5842.5513 7,129.16 323603 611812009 119219 PC/NAMETAG 44.08 SOLICITOR NAME TAGS 213857 15273811 1400.6406 44.08 323604 611812009 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 840.19 213766 28752723 5421.5510 840.19 323606 6118/2009 100949 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INTERNATIO 7,400.00 SUPERVISORY DEVEL ASSESSMENTS 213444 1101001875 5913.6103 7,400.00 323606 611812009 124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC. 520.00 OFFICE INTERVIEW EVALUATIONS 213858 89705 1400.6103 520.00 323607 6/1812009 100274 PGI COMPANIES INC 1,378.11 DRIVER INSPECTION FORMS 00005425 213859 14315 1553.640E 1,378.11 323608 6/18/2009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 37.12 213578 2762721 5862.551E Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 23 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS POOL OPERATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 103.71 213579 2762709 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 464.99 213580 2762710 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,205.28 213581 2762708 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16.67- 213582 3412794 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 38.32- 213583 3412749 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,335.24 213953 2759815 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 74.24 213954 2765848 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 689.93 213955 2765847 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,186.70 213956 2765846 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 438.55 213957 2765843 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 70.24 213958 2765845 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,067.75 213959 2765844 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 60.97 213960 2765840 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 438.17 213961 2765841 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 15,117.90 323609 611812009 100119 PING' 94.04 MERCHANDISE 213767 9782472 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 36.94 GRIPS 213768 9780396 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 130.98 323610 6/18/2009 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC. 5,395.29 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 00005994 213860 1400130544 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 5,395.29 323611 6/1812009 120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY 143.78 PICTURE FRAMES 213861 394835 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 143.78 323612 6/18/2009 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 850.64 TIRES 00001013 213769 748019 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 850.64 323613 6/18/2009 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 275.03 CO2 GAS 213770 33325816 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 275.03 323614 6/1812009 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES 39.14 CABLE TIES 00005699 213479 81011 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.49 CABLE TIES 00001104 213862 81019 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.99 CABLE TIES 00001105 213863 81018 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 237.62 CITY OF EDINA 6/1712009 7:40:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323615 6/1812009 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,080.57 SANITARY VENDOR, RECYCLING BII10002044 213864 4472 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,080.57 323616 611812009 100547 PULSTAR 53.38 AIR CARDS 213865 0050923 -IN 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 53.38 323617 6/18/2009 116481 PUTTING GREENS OF MINNESOTA 195.00 TURF TO COVER MH COVERS 00005740 213445 5 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 195.00 323618 6/18/2009 101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS 3,237.07 PUMP REPAIR, REPLACE CABLE 00001274 213866 21297 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 3,237.07 323619 611812009 100971 QUALITY WINE 927.95 213584 164670 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,508.81 213585 167100 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 890.30 213586 167492 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253.00 213587 167517 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,842.67 213588 167279 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 422.90 213589 167495 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 756.19 213590 167280 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 135.20 213591 167102 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,725.30 213592 167278 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 240.00- 213593 157827 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 901.50 213962 167493 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 888.41 213963 167101 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12,012.23 523620 611812009 123898 QWEST 86.60 952 926 -0419 213480 0419 -6/09 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 508.38 612 E24 -8657 213481 8657 -6/09 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 285.54 612 E24 -8656 213482 8656 -6109 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 507.85 612 E01 -8392 213483 8392 -6/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 51.76 952 926 -0092 213484 0092 -6/09 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 18.12 651 281 -1355 B001311 213485 1355 -6109 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 770.40 612 E01 -0426 213486 0426 -6/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 604.45 612 E12 -6797 213487 6797 -6/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 155.05 952 835 -1474 213653 1474 -6/09 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,988.15 323621 611812009 123246 RADDE, JENNIFER 139.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 213867 060709 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE SALE OF WATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 26 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY REVENUES GENERAL (BILLING) POOL OPERATION EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET TREES & MAINTENANCE S048A SIDEWALK 100W FRONTAGE R BA -363 BLAKE RD M&O S101 FRANCE AVE a' CUNNYSIDE 139.00 323622 6/1812009 124390 RAM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 422.48 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 213654 061009 5901.4626 422.48 323623 611812009 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 308.85 MAIL WATER BILLS 213868 2206 5910.6103 308.85 323624 6/1812009 124385 REFLECTIONS PRINTING INC. 159.75 WINDOW SIGN 213488 40682 5311.6180 159.75 323625 6/1812009 119765 RICCI, PATRICE 139.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213785 061209 4077.6103 139.50 323626 6/18/2009 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 80.88 BACK -UP LIGHT KITS 00001012 213655 1048317 -01 1553.6530 80.88 323627 611812009 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6/30109 213813 061209 5631.6136 200.00 323628 .611812009 124393 ROST, JANICE 72.36 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 213796 060909 5900.2015 72.36 323629 6/1812009 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 110.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00005997 213446 29714 1644.6103 110.00 323630 6118/2009 119478 SAFETY MEETING OUTLINES INC. 26.42 DAILY LOG 213656 060809 07048A.1705.31 26.43 DAILY LOG 213656 060809 01363.1705.31 26.43 DAILY LOG' 213656 060809 07101.1705.31 SALE OF WATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 26 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY REVENUES GENERAL (BILLING) POOL OPERATION EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET TREES & MAINTENANCE S048A SIDEWALK 100W FRONTAGE R BA -363 BLAKE RD M&O S101 FRANCE AVE a' CUNNYSIDE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/18/2009 - 6118/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 26.43 DAILY LOG 213656 060809 01356.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -356 MIRROR LAKES N'HOOD 26.43 DAILY LOG 213656 060809 01358.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -358 S GARDEN ESTATES N'HOOD 26.43 DAILY LOG 213656 060809 03430.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SS- 430 70TH & METRO 26.43 DAILY LOG 213656 060809 01352.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -352 WOODEND DRIVE 185.00 323631 611812009 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 45.95 BAKERY 213771 251110 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 45.95 323632 6/1812009 101232 SALUD AMERICA INC. 254.00 213594 EMLS060309 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 254.00 - 323633 6/1812009 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 12.89 101 = "" "9350 213657 060509 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 37.53 101 '•" "'9350 213657 060509 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 99.86 101.'-'* "9350 213657 060509 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 150.28 323634 6118/2009 122530 SAM AMERICA INC. 60.22 PRINTER RIBBONS 213869 30264611 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.22 . 323635 611812009 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 846.70 FILTERS 00005850 213772 110074 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 846.70 323636 6/1812009 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 396.58 CEDAR 00002043 213870 40748384 5630.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES 396.58 323637 6/1812009 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 24.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213791 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 202.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 213791 061209 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 226.00 323638 611812009 124388 SEATING AND ATHLETIC FACILITY 2,184.00 LOCKER ROOM SEAT COVERS 00008059 213658 060509 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,184.00 323639 6118/2009 100995 SEH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 — 6118/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,634.36 STREET RECONSTRUCTION 213447 217752 04352.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 3,771.59 STREET RECONSTRUCTION 213447 217752 05487.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 4,651.63 STREET RECONSTRUCTION 213447 217752 03445.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 15,086.38 STREET RECONSTRUCTION 213447 217752 01357.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,240.90 SEWER,WATER & STREET RECON 213448 217683 08043.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,987.88 SEWER,WATER & STREET RECON 213448 217683 08049.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 6,722.70 SEWER,WATER & STREET RECON 213448 217683 04297.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 10,457.54 SEWER,WATER & STREET RECON 213448 217683 03413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 16,806.76 SEWER,WATER & STREET RECON 213448 217683 01213.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 16,806.76 SEWER,WATER & STREET RECON 213448 217683 01214.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 18,674.18 SEWER,WATER & STREET RECON 213448 217683 05436.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 99,840.68 323640 6/1812009 120719 SEISLER, TOBY 312.00 LIFEGUARD INSTRUCTOR COURSE 213909 061509 5310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 312.00 323641 6/18/2009 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 197.75 PAINT 00008090 213773 3057 -0 5511.6532 PAINT 98.88 PAINT 00008092 213774 6577 -0 5511.6532 PAINT 296.63 323642 6/18/2009 120468 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES COR 1,260.11 WATER TREATMENT 00008082 213449 2782900 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,260.11 323643 6/1812009 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 176.00 STAFF SHIRTS 00005614 213450 298880 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 176.00 323644 6/18/2009 124397 SNAZA, ANNA 277.50 EDINA ART FAIR CLEAN UP 213801 061209 1346.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 277.50 323646 6/1812009 101004 SPS COMPANIES 97.64 REGULATORS 00005987 213451 S2045569.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 41.79 VALVES, KEYS, BUSHINGS 00001246 213871 S2048254.001 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 139.43 323646 6/18/2009 102193 STAN BANN BIG BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 6/28/09 213811 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 100.00 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 28 Business Unit STS -352 FAIRFAX N'HOOD WM -487 FAIRFAX N'HOOD SS-445 FAIRFAX N'HOOD BA -357 FAIRFAX N'HOOD L -43 COUNTRY CLUB L-49 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS PHASE I ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM POOL ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PATHS & HARD SURFACE PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 29 6/18/2009 - 611812009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323647 6118/2009 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 27.58 KEYS 00006282 213775 CH- 509186 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 27.58 323648 611812009 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 232.96 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 213776 1808753 -7/09 5621.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 232.96 323649 6/18/2009 101015 STREICHERS 31.93 MAG HOLDER 213872 1635365 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.99 TACLITE PRO PANTS 213873 1635526 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 71.92 323650 611812009 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 85.80 AD FOR BID 00014798 213452 1185028 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 28.60 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 213453 1185029 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 67.93 ASBESTOS AD FOR BID 213874 1186511 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 71.50 BLDG DEMO AD FOR BID 213875 _ 1186512 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 96.53 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 213876 1186513 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 350.36 323651 6/1812009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 859.00 213964 D8702 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 859.00 323652 611812009 104932 TAYLOR MADE 921.45 MERCHANDISE 213777 12045164 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 921.45 323653 611812009 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 501.35 REVOLUTION " 00006493 213454 S112429 -IN 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS . 501.35 323654 6118/2009 118214 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES INC. 210.00 WATER SAMPLES 00001287 213877 30066030 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 210.00 323655 6/18/2009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 598.00 213778 72064 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,883.55 213965 545651 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,481.55 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323656 6/1812009 118539 TIMM, JANE 77.00 SEMINAR MILEAGE 213878 061509 1424.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE PAINT PAINT WELDING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6117/2009 7:40:29 Page- 30 Business Unit LIQUOR INSPECTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 77.00 323657 6118/2009 101293 TODD, DARRELL 56.99 TESTING DAY SUPPLIES 213779 061009 1470.6106 56.99 323658 611812009 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING 1,280.29 PAINT FENCES AND GATE 213489 060709 5311.6532 9,938.00 AQUATIC CENTER PAINTING 00007084 213490 JUN0709 5311.6532 11,218.29 323659 6/1812009 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 70.08 WELDING GASES 00001113 213491 480903 1553.6580 40.80 WELDING SUPPLIES 213879 480904 5630.6406 110.88 323660 6/1812009 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 30.75 213595 220615 5842.5514 30.75 323661 611812009 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 196.38 UNIFORM WINDBREAKERS 00002040 213780 11641 5630.6201 196.38 323662 611812009 100682 TRUGREEN LAWNCARE 109.04 WEED CONTROL 00005998 213659 684600,01,02 1643.6103 109.04 323663 6118/2009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 130.08 DECK 00005754 213660 S118502 1553.6530 107.13 FAN BELTS 00001261 213880 J116471 1553.6530 237.21 323664 6/1812009 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 54.00 BOLT, BLADES 00005980 213455 352244 1646.6406 54.00 323665 6/1812009 105499 TWIN CITY TILE AND MARBLE CO. 1,735.00 MARBLE PLANTERS 00005263 213881 0006232 -IN 4090.6406 MEETING EXPENSE PAINT PAINT WELDING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6117/2009 7:40:29 Page- 30 Business Unit LIQUOR INSPECTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000, CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date __ Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No 2,495.00 MARBLE PLANTERS 00005325 213882 0006231 -IN - 4090.6406 4,230.00 323666 611812009 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL. 115379 U.S. BANK GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN i CONSULTING INSPECTION '88.14 MEETING EXPENSES 213661 060409 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.90 NET ZERO 213662 JUN0409 146.80 INTERNET 213662 J_UN0409 15.00 CAR WASH 213663 JUN4,2009 - 31.88 VULKEM 213663 JUN4,2009 44.71 CLEANER 213663 JUN42009 . , 45.90 TRAINING 213663 JUN4,2009 205.23 SUPPLIES 213663 JUN4,2009 " 340.36 TOOLS 213663 JUN4,2009 934.92 . 323667 6/18/2009 120676 ULTRAMAX 1,239.00 FEDERAL 40 165GR TACTICAL HP 213883 105465 1,239.00 323668 611812009 102328 UNIMED MI4WEST INC. 386.41 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003540 213781 0064668 386.41 323669 6118/2009 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC 569.09 REPAIR NEON ON CLOCK 213492 44169 569.09 323670 6/1812009 103298 -UPS STORE #1716, THE 40.58 SHIPPING CHARGES 213884 TRAN:4769 7.24 UPS DELIVERY 00001255 213885 TRAN:5413 47.82 323671 6/18/2009 100668 URS CORPORATION L 2,994.00 PROMENADE PHASE 11 IMPROVEMENT 213664 3861829 ' 16,966.00 PROMENADE PHASE II IMPROVEMENT 213664 3861829 -. 19,960.00 323672 '611812009 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 90.75 , STORZ FITTINGS 00001095 213456 828505 90.75 323673 611812009 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 1120.6106 1500.6103 1550.6155 1553.6238 1301.6406 5923.6406 5919.6104 5923.6406 1301.6556 1419.6104 1470.6510 5841.6180 Subledger Account Description GENERNCSUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BANK SERVICES CHARGES CAR WASH GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS CONFERENCES' &SCHOOLS FIRST AID SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 31 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS t TRAINING COLLECTION SYSTEMS GENERAL MAINTENANCE . RESERVE PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL. 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 04363.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -363 PROMENADE PHASE 2 05469.1705.21' CONSULTING' INSPECTION WM-469 NORTH PROMENADE 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION ".t R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 32 6118/2009 - 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378.16 PAGERS 213886 S0319246F 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 378.16 323674 6118/2009 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 3,148.76 SERVICE LINE REPAIR 00005733 213782 14518 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 5,281.50 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 00001286 213887 14529 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 8,430.26 323675 611812009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 227.37 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS 00007512 213493 123154 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 107.05 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 213494 123154 -01 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 334.42 323676 6/1812009 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 188.25 INSTRUMENT PANEL ASSEMBLY 00006495 213457 42375 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 616.90 CONTROLLER, THROTTLE SENSOR00002023 213888. 42431 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 805.15 323677 6/18/2009 101061 VICTORY CORPS 23.18 SNAPS 00006287 213783 79603 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 58.16 5X8 FLAG 00006287 213784 79488 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 81.34 323678 6/18/2009 101066 VIIQNG ELECTRIC SUPPLY 384.32 REPAIR PARTS 00001079 213889 3705210 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 384.32 323679 611812009 124242 VINIFERA IMPORTS LTD 164.00 213596 322791 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 164.00 323680 611812009 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 102.00 213597 27170 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 354.00 213598 27158 -1 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 270.75- 213599 5.28.09CR 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 185.25 323681 6/1812009 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 463.00 213600 12810 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 463.00 323682 6118/2009 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION R55CKREG LOG20000 276326 1,954.69 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 213968 277190 323683 Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 277193 5862.5513 6/18/2009 - 6118/2009 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 464.13 CONCESSION PRODUCT 213495 25692252 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,101.68 CONCESSION PRODUCT 213496 25683428 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 388.88 CONCESSION PRODUCT 213890 25733290 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 323690 611812009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 402.23 927.08 3.897.89 5,028.32 GENERAL SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page- 33 Business Unit POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 213602 276326 1,954.69 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 213968 277190 323683 611812009 50TH ST SELLING 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 277193 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 213970 120.35 BULBS 00001099 213458 15131049 -00 5860.6406 120.35 323684 611812009 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 2,638.82 SWEEPINGS DISPOSAL 00001114 213497 5026132 1301.6182 2,638.82 323685 611812009 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 452.20 LEAK LOCATING 00005739 213498 1342 5913.6180 452.20 323686 6118/2009 124396 WEBER, ANN 345.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEAN UP 213803 061209 1346.6406 345.00 323687 611812009 124395 WEBER, STEPHANIE 345.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEAN UP 213802 061209 1346.6406 345.00 323688 611812009 124199 WEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES 240.00 AUTO TRACK SERVICE - MAY 213891 AB0001985482 1400.6230 240.00 323689 6118/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 197.53 213601 219617 -00 5822.5513 601.90 213966 219619 -00 5842.5513 408.80 213967 219700 -00 5862.5513 323690 611812009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 402.23 927.08 3.897.89 5,028.32 GENERAL SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page- 33 Business Unit POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 213602 276326 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 213968 277190 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 213969 277193 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 213970 277191 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Council Check Register Page - 34 6/18/2009 - 6118/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323692 6118/2009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,082.15 213603 236476 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 813.10 213604 237680 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 559.60 213605 239344 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13,343.07 213606 236479 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,508.87 213607 239345 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 474.39 213608 239729 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,450.22 213609 237685 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 92.41 213610 241028 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 163.10 213611 240927 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,075.77 213612 241025 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,219.13 213613 236143 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 151.59 213614 241018 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,381.34 213615 241019 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,279.98 213616 241024 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 76.59 213617 241023 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 49.10 213618 241022 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 982.15 213619 241021 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 479.07 213620 241020 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 28.95- 213621 778665 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 191.15- 213622 778664 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.17- 213623 778499 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 115.98- 213624 778152 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,130.14 213971 241017 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,759.89 213972 241016 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,237.64 213973 241026 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,977.88 213974 241027 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 228.12- 213975 778630 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 42.48- 213976 778151 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 24.23- 213977 758602 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 52,620.10 323693 611812009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 798.54 213978 230224 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,389.25 213979 230222 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,187.79 323694 611812009 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,056.50 70TH ST CORRIDOR 213665 01686 - 050-24 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 2,056.50 323695 61 19 124391 WU, SO LAN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/17/2009 7 :40:29 Council Check Register Page - . 35 6118/2009 L 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description " Business Unit 9.73 • SEASON TICKET REFUND 213792 061109 -, 5300.2039 SALES &,USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 131.24 SEASON TICKET REFUND 213792 061109 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 140.97 a 323696 611812009 101726 , XCEL ENERGY 27.23 51- 7567037 -0 213499 198176119 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 11.51 51- 9189085 -8 213500 198210030 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,400.19 51- 6621207 -1 213501 198162204 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,573:89 51- 9013604 -6 213502 198056766 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 29.24 51- 4151897 -6 213503 198126794 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 493.74 51- 6137136 -8 213504 197996960 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 154.01 51- 6229265 -9 213505 197997115 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,004.80 51- 6979948 -4 213506 197845722 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,210.95 51- 6979948 -4 213506 197845722 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,385.57 51- 6979948 -4 213506 197845722 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER - YORK OCCUPANCY 4,122.30: 51- 5888961 -7 213666 198648048 1375.6185 LIGHT &POWER: PARKING RAMP 3,732.33 51- 5619094 -8 213667 198644591 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,876.16 51- 6840050 -6 213668 198668874 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 1,669.18 51- 6229265 -9 213692 198923256 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 292.95 51- 4197645 -8 213893 198807212 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,526.40 51- 6227619 -3 213894 199200312 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER, CENTENNIAL LAKES 29,353.88 51- 5605640 -1 213895 199020959 5913.6185 LIGHT &POWER DISTRIBUTION 55,864.33 323697 6/18/2009 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 30.09 MAY USAGE - BLDG/ENG 00004322 213507 040724846 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 144.73 MAY USAGE- PARK & REC 00004322 213508 040724847 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 174.82 • 323698 6/18/2009 124392 YIP, ICY 29.19 SEASON TICKET REFUND 213793 061009 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 393.73 SEASON TICKET REFUND 213793 061009 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS' AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 422.92 323699 6118/2009 121358 YUAN,_6ECILIA 50.00 GOLF LEAGUE REFUND 213795 060809 - 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS 50.00 323700 611812009 122316 ZACK'S INC. 80.63 HAND CLEANER 00006487 213459 24982 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE &'GROUNDS ,, 80.63 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2009 — 6/18/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323701 611812009 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 2,044.80 GUTTER BROOMS 00005428 213669 0123116 -IN 1310.6523 2,044.80 323702 6118/2009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 29.71 SEAL KIT, O -RINGS 00001196 213896 PCO01146781 1553.6530 29.71 323703 6/18/2009 102960 ZUHRAH SHRINE FLAMES 100.00 PERFORMANCE 6/24/09 213808 061209 5631.6136 100.00 Subledger Account Description BROOMS 1,115,520.02 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,115,520.02 Total Payments 1,115,520.02 REPAIR PARTS 6/17/2009 7:40:29 Page - 36 Business Unit STREET CLEANING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKSt.j. 420000 CITY t JA 6/1 7:41:50 Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/18/2009 - 6/18/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 337,937.45 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 4,512.46 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 258,462.99 05100 ART CENTER FUND 474.19 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,137.36 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 30,899.28 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 30,898.13 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 14,816.39 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 17,335.95 05800 LIQUOR FUND 198,964.01 05900 UTILITY FUND 164,372.58 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 14,987.34 05950 RECYCLING FUND 38,118.84 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 603.05 Report Totals 1,115,520.02 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll i s jpd procedures daten 19 R55CKREG LOG20000 400.00 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 323706 612512009 Council Check Register Page - 1 6/25/2009 -6/25/2009 208738 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323704 6/25/2009 0721960 118536 A& B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 32.60 10.65 RELAY 00001368 214271 53796 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.40 10.65 214066 0802495 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 323705 6/25/2009 92.00 101833 A.T.O.M. 214067 506977 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 400.00 FTO CERTIFICATION 214138 18575327 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CLUB HOUSE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,360.00 PRUNING, PLANT CLEANING 214274 EDINA -0509 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,360.00 323711 612512009 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 400.00 323706 612512009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 61.00 208738 0721962 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 55.60 208739 0721960 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 32.60 208740 0721961 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 29.40 214066 0802495 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 92.00 214067 506977 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 65.00 214068 0802480 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 54.00 214069 0802481 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 46.40 214070 0802496 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 61.20 214071 0802499 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 94.60 214072 0802483 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 41.40 214388 0722308 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 69.80 214389 0722310 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 122.00 214390 0802604 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 825.00 323707 612512009 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 30.98 ALARM MONITORING 214272 94683976 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE 883.88 ALARM MONITORING 00006100 214339 94683662 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE 914.86 323708 612512009 119813 AERIAL PAINTING INC. 1,665.00 REPAINTING OF LIGHT POLES 00001367 214273 061709 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,665.00 323709 612512009 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 904.53 COPIER PAPER 213980 10205851 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 904.53 323710 6/25/2009 119976 AP LAWN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CLUB HOUSE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,360.00 PRUNING, PLANT CLEANING 214274 EDINA -0509 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,360.00 323711 612512009 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 692.60 FOOD 214340 1170998 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 692.60. 323712 6/25/2009 104235 APPLIED MEDIA 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/2/09 214429 061909 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 323713 6/25/2009 101276 APRES 26.73 LINEN 00006102 214341 126337 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 26.73 323714 6125/2009 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 289.73 AQUATIC CENTER REPAIRS 00007120 214275 34181 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 289.73 323715 6/25/2009 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 188.20 COFFEE 213981 907462 1550.6406- GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 188.20 323716 6/25/2009 124419 ARIZONA GUN RUNNERS 811.00 ERT AMMO 00003143 214276 373868 1401.6551 AMMUNITION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM . 811.00 323717 6/25/2009 100638 BACHMAN'S 791.48 PLANTS 00001256 214139 12781 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 791.48 323718 6125/2009 100642 BANNERS TO GO 149.10 PARK SIGNS 00001177 213982 28243 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 111.83 PARK SIGNS 00005996 213983 28315 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 521.85 PARK SIGNS 00001161 213984 28352 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 782.78 323719 6/25/2009 101343 BEHR, JASON 272.39 UNIFORM PURCHASE 214140 061209 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 272.39 323720 6/25/2009 122593 BELDE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,898.35 JANITORIAL SERVICE - JUNE 214277 1054 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,898.35 323721 612r 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 3 6/2512009 -6125/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,390.62 214073 49296300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,966.89 214074 49311600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.56 214075 49311900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20.50 214076 49312800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 264.14 214077 49312000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 26.00 214078 82348300 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 35.95 214076 82348300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 709.50 214213 49311800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 60.05 214391 82348200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 297.63 214392 5817900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6.30 214393 82376800 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 207.90 214393 82376800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,987.04 323722 6/25/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 15.33 GLUE STICKS 213985 WO- 565704 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.39 FILE JACKETS 213986 WO- 565387 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 17.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 213987 WO- 565468 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 65.67 PENS 213988 OE- 195348 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 18.96- RETURN 213989 CP- OE- 195348 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 21.13 COPYHOLDERS 214141 WO- 566042 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 105.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009027 214142 OE- 195845 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 33.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009031 214143 OE- 196536 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 416.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003138 214194 WO- 565508 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 181.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 214278 OE- 197080 -1 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. VERNON SELLING 893.19 323723 6/26/2009 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 94.26 TOILET SERVICE 00001175 213990 16245 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 94.26 323724 6126/2009 103879 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CENTER 138.90 SOD CUTTER RENTAL 00002254 214279 62589 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 138.90 323725 6/25/2009 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 6,285.00 TEST SOIL BORINGS 00008091 214280 308026 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 6,285.00 323726 6/2512009 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 368.98 GRAVEL 214424 053109 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 481.21 BALLFIELD AGLIME 214424 053109 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 4 6/25/2009 — 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100681 CATCO 850.19 205.73 PURGE VALVE KITS, CARTRIDGES 00001208 323727 6/25/2009 1553.6530 104649 BRYAN, BILL 205.73 323733 97.35 SUMP PUMP 213991 061609 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 254.95 97.35 213993 PGT4504 1120.6406 254.95 323728 6/2512009 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 323734 6/2512009 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.. 2,241.29 ASPHALT 00005445 213992 7117MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 1169220 1301.6556 2,241.29 316.59 323729 6/25/2009 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 1,272.00 JOSEPH MATINEE 542.39 MERCHANDISE 214342 918751572 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 542.39 323730 612512009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 54.90 2'14079 15326 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,868.30 214080 15325 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 767.25 214214 15322 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,690.45 323731 6/2512009 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 600.00 214081 82350 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 156.00 214215 82413 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.00 214216 82444 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9200 214217 82443 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 940.00 323732 6/25/2009 100681 CATCO 205.73 PURGE VALVE KITS, CARTRIDGES 00001208 214281 3 -74385 1553.6530 205.73 323733 6/25/2009 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 254.95 ADOBE ACROBAT 00004328 213993 PGT4504 1120.6406 254.95 323734 6/2512009 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.. 316.59 LIVEL, FLOATS, NOZZLE 00005086 213994 1169220 1301.6556 316.59 323735 6/25/2009 105851 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 1,272.00 JOSEPH MATINEE 214430 288454 1628.6103.07 1,272.00 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 5 612512009 -6125/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323736 6/25/2009 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 322.45 214082 393511 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 322.45 323737 6125/2009 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 711/09 214431 061909 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323738 612512009 103235 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 75.00 BASIC SWAT 214144 061609 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 323739 612512009 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 2,596.30 00077479- 0113317143 214282 0113317143 -6109 5620.6189 SEWER & WATER EDINBOROUGH PARK 42.72 00079303 - 0155300009 214283 0155300009 -6/09 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 264.72 00079303- 0155300018 214284 0155300018 -6/09 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 70.68 00102561- 0112920000 214285 011292000D -6/09 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 77.05 00110793- 0155250018 214343 0155250018 -6/09 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 42.72 00110793 - 0173001000 214344 0173001000 - 6/09 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 42.72 00110793 - 0173001001 214345 0173001001 -6/09 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,313.35 00110793 - 0155200000 214346 0155200000 -6/09 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 4,450.26 323740 6125/2009 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.51 WINDOW CLEANING 213995 443599 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 16.49 WINDOW CLEANING 213995 443599 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 25.99 WINDOW CLEANING 213995 443599 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 56.99 323741 6/2512009 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 522.50 214394 0198154317 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 772.90 214395 0138068529 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,295.40 323742 6/26/2009 101345 COLOURS 275.00 BROCHURE DESIGN 213996 10100 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 3,919.50 WATER REPORT DESIGN 214145 10093 -01 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 117.00 UTILITY BILL STUFFIER DESIGN 214146 10103 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 4,311.50 323743 6/25/2009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 112.03 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00001241 213997 03476959 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 112.03 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00001241 213997 03476959 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 112.03 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00001241 213997 03476959 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 112.03 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00001241 213997 03476959 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.63 SUNSCREEN /LIPBALM 00001074 214147 03478536 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 95.06 EARPLUGS. SAFETY GLASSES 00001241 214195 03479405 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 577.81 323744 6/25/2009 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 52.89 CLAY 00009020 214148 INV000044421 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,059.24 CLAY 00009020 214148 INV000044421 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 1,112.13 323745 6125/2009 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 320.51 MERCHANDISE CERTIFICATES 00006101 214347 00049444 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 320.51 323746 6125/2009 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 864.69 CUPS FOR RESALE 214286 4443 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 870.00 RUBBER WRISTBANDS 214287 4477 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,734.69 323747 612512009 104020 DALCO 189.57 WASP & HORNET KILLER 00001110 213998 2105215 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 396.13 TOWELS, CUPS 00001238 213999 2105262 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 585.70 323748 6125/2009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 43.00 214083 507551 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,495.75 214084 508369 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,905.52 214085 507550 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 44.80 214218 508368 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,900.65 214219 508367 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 44.80 214396 508366 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,320.85 214397 508365 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 10,755.37 323749 6/2512009 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 40.67 BAKERY 214348 303234 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 150.06 BAKERY 214349 303235 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 82.84 BAKERY 214350 303236 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 43.41 BAKERY 214351 303626 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 7 6/25/2009 —6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 31.97 BAKERY 214352 303697 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 65.00 BAKERY 214353 303978 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 413.95 323760 6/2512009 102812 DEPARTMENT OF LABORS INDUSTRY 30.00 LICENSE RENEWAL - J. LUGER 214000 PL04868 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 30.00 LICENSE RENEWAL - R. ATOL 214001 PL00332 5410.6105 DUES S SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 60.00 323751 6/25/2009 102831 DEX EAST 237.50 214432 650243624 -6/09 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 18.00 214433 110350670 -6/09 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 255.50 323752 6125/2009 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 1,965.93 FA -2 00005444 214002 67869 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL S ROCK STREET RENOVATION 1,965.93 323753 6/25/2009 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 204.48 TRAFFIC CONES 00001250 214003 0087500 -IN 1325.6531 SIGNS S POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 204.48 323754 6/25/2009 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 10.12 AWARD 214354 78979 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 10.12 323755 6/25/2009 106467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 1,125.00 ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 214149 061709 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 1,125.00 323766 6/25/2009 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 18.00 GYM USE - PERMIT #32263 214004 7964 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 18.00 323757 612512009 104172 ELECTRIC CRAFTSMAN INC. 4.23 4KV MED HOSE 00001076 214425 13856 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE S GROUNDS 4.23 323758 612512009 124042 ELNESS SWENSON GRAHAM ARCHITEC 2.309.57 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 214288 0022206 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 2.309.57 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323759 6/2512009 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC 201.00 214398 787142 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 201.00 323760 6/25/2009 122549 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY 20.22 214355 6398105 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 547.14 FOOD 214356 6398106 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 567.36 323761 6/25/2009 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 139.00 GEAR REPAIRS 214150 6205 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 139.00 323762 6/2512009 102360 FIRE SPECIALTIES COMPANY 315.44 SEALS 00003539 214151 10670 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 315.44 323763 6/2512009 113987 FISHER, PETER 171.00 UNIFORM BOOTS 214357 061809 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 171.00 323764 6/2612009 122668 FITZGERALD EXCAVATING & TRUCKI 1,346.88 FINAL PAYMENT 214267 062609 04357.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -357 STORMWATER DREDGING 1,346.88 323765 612512009 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 485.80 ART SUPPLIES 00009042 214289 061809 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 485.80 323766 6125/2009 100764 G & K SERVICES 61.92 SHOP TOWELS 214426 1006617375 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 61.92 SHOP TOWELS 214427 1006641459 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 123.84 323767 6125/2009 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 1,037.50 STAFF SHIRTS 214290 78591 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 209.00 STAFF SHIRTS 214291 78592 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 1,246.50 323768 6/25/2009 103186 GERTENS 79.54 PLANTINGS 00005992 214005 173538 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANr- 79.54 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/25/2009 - 6/2512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323769 6/25/2009 101464 GIRARD'S BUSINESS SOLUTIONS IN 175.00 FOLDING MACHINE REPAIR 00007122 214006 085961 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 175.00 323770 6/25/2009 102658 GLEWWE DOORS INC. 288.00 INSTALL CLOSER 214292 145422 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 288.00 323771 6/25/2009 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 62.17 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 00001119 214007 64805 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62:17 323772 6/25/2009 101103 GRAINGER 11.81 GRINDING WHEELS 00001157 214008 9010566710 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 32.29 BALL VALVES, REDUCER BUSHING 00005777 214009 9011882090 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 188.32 SAW 00006297 214010 9006730650 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 363.83 WALL BRACKETS 00002207 214293 9871566411 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 96.14 STOCK TANK 00001267 214294 9013675294 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.84 SCREW, MAT 214295 9009988578 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 50.88 LAMPS 214295 9009988578 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 114.87 MOTOR BELTS 00008002 214296 9011442408 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 894.98 323773 6125/2009 120201 GRANICUS INC. 829.64 WEBSTREAMING - JULY 214152 12886 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 323774 6/25/2009 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 200.00 FLOWERS AND PLANTERS 214297 061809 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 226.49 FLOWERS AND PLANTERS 214297 061809 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 426.49 323775 6125/2009 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 403.87 LIGHT BULBS 00002247 214298 941764723 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 403.87 323776 6/2512009 100784 GRAZZINI BROTHERS AND CO. 500.00 QUARRY TILE PATCHING 214011 126767 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 500.00 323777 6/25/2009 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/25/2009 — 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383.08 COUPLINGS, TEES 00001351 214012 091194 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 387.02 STREETSCAPE IRRIGATION 00001351 214013 091126 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 770.10 323778 6125/2009 100766 GREUPNER, JOE 4,985.00 LESSONS 214358 061809 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 4,985.00 323779 612512009 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 260.90 TRIMMER, HEADS 00001178 214153 10527 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 260.90 323780 612512009 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 119.18 REGISTER PAPER 00007515 214154 265016 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 119.18 323781 6/2512009 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 214359 021840 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 205.44 323782 6/2512009 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 1,560.02 RADIO ADMIN FEE 214155 29058118 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,560.02 323783 6/2512009 116377 HENRICKSEN PSG 607.05 SHELVING INSTALLATION 00003779 214014 432220 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 607.05 323784 6/2612009 124420 HILAU, ANNE 48.00 PROGRAM REFUND 214360 061909 1600.4390.25 CHEERLEEDING CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 48.00 323785 6/2512009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 357.35 214086 488709 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,736.09 214220 489474 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,093.44 323786 6125/2009 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 105.01 PVC COUPLINGS 00001158 214015 566691 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 105.01 323787 6121 121231 INTERLOCK CONCRETE PRODUCTS IN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6124/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 11 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423.84 PAVERS 00001115 214016 49654 -1 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 423.84 323788 6/25/2009 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 2.53 214017 053109 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3.23 214017 053109 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 7.66 214017 053109 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 15.30 214017 053109 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.71 214017 053109 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 29.79 214017 053109 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 57.28 214017 053109 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 58.73 214017 053109 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 89.01 214017 053109 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.06 214017 053109 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 138.80 214017 053109 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 140.10 214017 053109 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 172.62 214017 053109 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 206.24 214017 053109 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 221.23 214017 053109 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 307.96 214017 053109 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 527.27 214017 053109 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,181.54 214017 053109 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,274.06 323789 6/25/2009 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 33.38 LENS 00001451 214421 0012411 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.28 WINDOW HANDLES 00001382 214422 0013346 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.66 323790 6125/2009 102146 JESSEN PRESS 320.73 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 641.46 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 641.46 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION 641.46 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 962.19 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 962.19 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,282.92 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4,810.98 PARK & REC SUMMER INSIDER 214018 15346 1600.6575 PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 165.08 CITY COUNCIL BROCHURES 214156 15412 • 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 10,428.47 323791 612512009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,881.35 214087 1284868 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 351.00 214361 1281599 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 195.00 214362 1285563 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,194.65 214399 1284919 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 73.90 214400 1284926 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,525.60 214401 1284925 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,221.50 323793 6125/2009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,996.02 214086 1645647 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,922.03 214089 1645649 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,008.00 214090 1646003 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 451.48 214091 1645636 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,232.78 214092 1645648 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 414.00 214093 1645644 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,428.42 214094 1645650 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 55.16- 214095 421709 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.79- 214096 421710 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 50.22- 214097 421899 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.67- 214098 422040 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.00- 214099 421900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.77- 214100 422041 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.00- 214101 421898 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.96- 214102 421904 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.22- 214103 422355 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.58- 214104 421903 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.67- 214105 421902 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.16- 214106 421901 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 68.44 214221 1646538 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,716.08 214222 1649666 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 517.10 214223 1649663 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,482.76 214224 1649665 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 633.60 214225 1649664 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 74.45 214226 1649654 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,661.49 214227 1649667 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,515.30 214228 1649668 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3.36 214229 1649655 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 18.72- 214230 421769 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 27.72- 214231 421768 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9.00- 214232 421708 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 18.00- 214233 421707 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/25/2009 - 6125/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4.48 214402 1649653 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 503.24 214403 1649660 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,978.47 214404 1649658 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,339.13 214405 1649661 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 160.85 214406 1649662 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,238.02 214407 1649657 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 74.45 214408 1649652 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 880.40 214409 1650439 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45,019.71 323794 6/2512009 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 32.32 HEAVY DUTY EXTENSION CORD 214157 060909 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 37.61 78 STYLUS REPLACEMENT 214157 060909 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 69.93 323795 6/25/2009 111018 KEEPRS INC. 10.00 UNIFORM 00003872 214158 113119 -80 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.00 323796 6/2512009 102147 KELLER FENCE COMPANY 69.49 FENCE CAPS 00007116 214019 14638 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 69.49 323797 6/2612009 105171 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO. 7,332.44 FINAL PAYMENT 214268 062609 05471.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -471 NEW WELL #20 7,332.44 323798 612512009 122074 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 121.50 PETTY CASH 214299 061509 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 121.50 323799 612512009 124414 KUCERA, BEVERLY 22.00 CLASS REFUND 214196 061709 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 323800 6125/2009 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 10,513.64 LAKE WEED CONTROL 00005534 214020 67636 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 10, 513.64 323801 6/2512009 123265 LANDWEHR CONSTRUCTION INC. 6,996.65 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 214269 062609 10091.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge 6,996.65 R55CKREG LOG20000 214108 477205 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,006.45 214109 478054 5842.5514 Council Check Register YORK SELLING 1,922.80 214110 477493 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6/25/2009 - 6125/2009 214111 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 323802 6125/2009 214363 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 142.80 214364 479127 118.35 HOLESAWS 00001235 214021 8161188 1553.6556 TOOLS 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 82.95 WASHERS, LOCKNUTS 00001102 214197 8161187 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING 9,767.40 123.09 SCREWS, PINS, PLUGS 00001258 214300 8171453 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 324.39 323803 6125/2009 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 1,100.56 TOPDRESSING SAND 214022 060109RICHAR 5431.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 1,100.56 323804 612512009 124418 LEXUS OF WAYZATA 94.20 CUT AND PROGRAMMED KEY 214198 339179 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.20 323805 6125/2009 102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE 587.50 AQUATIC CENTER BROCHURES, AD 214159 15 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 587.50 . 323806 6/2512009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,062.55 214107 63929 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,062.55 323807 612512009 103286 M.T.OA. 2,520.00 SWAT CONFERENCE 214160 061609 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2,520.00 323808 6/25/2009 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. .17.08 SOAP 214301 W23070 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.08 323809 612512009 100868 MARK VII SALES 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 60.00 214108 477205 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,006.45 214109 478054 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,922.80 214110 477493 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,856.35 214111 477204 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 129.00 214112 477494 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 776.00 214363 479126 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 142.80 214364 479127 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 598.00 214365 476263 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 276.00 214410 479987 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,767.40 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2412009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/2512009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323810 6125/2009 101928 MCKEN23E, THOMAS 72.57 UNIFORM PURCHASE 214199 061809 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 72.57 323811 6/2512009 101483 MENARDS 25.05 GRATES 00005991 214023 46114 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 202.14 HOSE HANGERS, REEL CARTS 00001237 214024 47663 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 227.19 323812 6125/2009 101987 MENARDS 8.13 PLUMBING ELBOW 00002255 214302 92346 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 84.17 HOSE, BATTERIES 00002255 214303 91871 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 92.30 323813 6/25/2009 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 114.91 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001254 214025 116306 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 114.91 323814 6/26/2009 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 351.87 ASPHALT 00005445 214161 99365MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 707.34 ASPHALT 00005445 214161 99365MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,059.21 323815 612512009 101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 47.18 HINGES 00001160 214026 133315 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.18 323816 6/26/2009 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 347.90 GAS 00006204 214027 44994 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 252.00 DIESEL 00006205 214028 44995 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 397.60 GAS 00006204 214029 44993 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 997.50 323817 6/25/2009 101542 MILTONA TURF PRODUCTS 175.99 SEED TOOL 214030 203862 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 175.99 323818 6/25/2009 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 342.40 METHANE CYLINDERS 214304 951932 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 34140 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323819 6/25/2009 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 66.44 GLAZES 00009038 214162 57575 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 66.44 323820 6125/2009 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 1,098.00 PURSUIT DRIVING CLASSES 214305 629430 -1306 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 732.00 PURSUIT DRIVING CLASSES 214306 629430 -1300 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 1,830.00 323821 6/25/2009 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,236.47 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005449 214031 59318 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,009.62 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005449 214163 59325 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,246.09 323822 6125/2009 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 204.12 BLADE, BELTS, FILTERS 00001268 214032 0080713 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.82 REPAIR KIT 00001156 214033 0080780 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 246.94 323823 612512009 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 93.54 STORAGE 214307 151022581 7412.6153 STORAGE PSTF RANGE 93.54 323824 6/25/2009 103246 MOIR, BILL 300.00 AQUATIC CENTER CHANGE FUND 214434 062209 5300.1040 CHANGE FUND AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 300.00 323825 6/25/2009 103246 MOIR, BILL 14.29 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 214435 061909 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 22.56 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 214435 061909 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 26.45 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 214435 061909 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 35.46 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 214435 061909 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 96.76 323826 6/2512009 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT 500.00 HOSTING FEE 214308 126602 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 323827 6/2512009 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 24.28 FILTERS 00001027 214309 469292F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.28 R55CKREG LOG20000 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT Council Check Register 6/25/2009 - 6125/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323828 6/25/2009 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 2,140.47 SERVICE AGREEMENT 214164 78116233 1400.6230 2,140.47 323829 6/25/2009 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 698.99 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 214310 20170 5620.5510 698.99 323830 6/2512009 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 159.00 UNIFORM PURCHASES 00001828 214034 NIA4061A 1301.6201 159.00 323831 6/25/2009 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 499.47 STEEL 00001117 214035 149447 1553.6530 499.47 323832 6/2512009 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 137.26 FOUNTAIN PARTS 00001275 214311 S01200865.001 5630.6530 137.26 323833 6/25/2009 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 175.55 PAINT, PENCIL SHARPENERS 00009036 214165 37477500 5120.5510 175.55 323834 6/25/2009 118402 NSII MECHANICAL CONTRACTING CO 5,777.33 BOILER REPAIRS 214166 W17328 5311.6160 5,777.33 323835 6125/2009 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE - JUNE 214200 060109 1400.6230 557.72 323836 6125/2009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 32.46 PAPER 00006034 214366 477468507 -001 5410.6513 64.16 PAPER 00006034 214367 476811920 -001 5410.6513 96.62 323837 6/2512009 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 432.13 214201 W09050614 5420.6188 20.62 ARNESON 214202 W09050608 1646.6188 20.62 214202 W09050608 1550.6188 41.24 214202 W09050608 5111.6168 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINSOROUGH PARK LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6124/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 18 6/25/2009 - 6125/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 41.24 GREENHOUSE 214202 W09050608 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 82.48 214202 W09050608 - 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 82.48 214202 W09050608 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 89.04 214202 W09050608 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 103.10 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 214202 W09050608 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 103.14 214202 W09050608 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 108.05 HISTORICAL 214202 W09050608 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 123.72 214202 W09050608 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK-OCCUPANCY 136.53 214202 W09050608 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 288.68 214202 W09050608 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 560.82 214202 W09050608 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 2,233.89 323838 6/25/2009 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 638.90 WEED WHIPS 00006295 214036 552827 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 638.90 323839 6/25/2009 124416 OLSON, LOIS 22.00 CLASS REFUND 214203 061609 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 323840 612512009 124186 OPEN AIR CINEMA LLC 1,905.00 SPEAKERS 00002327 214312 1949 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,905.00 323841 6125/2009 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 112.25 PEST CONTROL 214368 46914146 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 112.25 323842 612512009 117993 P 8, H SERVICES 79.05 STALKER UNIT REPAIR 214167 13193 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.05 323843 612512009 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 10,047.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 214270 061209 08049.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L-49 49,844.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 214270 061209 01213.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 85,702.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 214270 061209 04297.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST 152,179.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 214270 061209 01214.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 318,383.79 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 214270 061209 03413.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 457,655.56 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 214270 061209 05436.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM 1,073,812.63 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/25/2009 - 6/2512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323844 612512009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,987.45 214113 8225592 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,342.31 214234 8225596 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 511.49 214235 8225266 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,157.87 214236 8225599 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 276.25 214237 8225212 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,275.37 323845 6/25/2009 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 574.19 214313 55059563 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 165.48 214369. 28752790 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 739.67 323846 6125/2009 100950 PETTY CASH 1.00 214137 061709 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 4.00 214137 061709 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 4.66 214137 061709 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 14.70 214137 061709 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 15.91 214137 061709 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 18.12 214137 061709 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 18.90 214137 061709 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20.00 214137 061709 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 21.36 214137 061709 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 23.70 214137 061709 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 30.00 214137 061709 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 30.00 214137 061709 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 30.00 214137 061709 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 34.10 214137 061709 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 36.28 214137 061709 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 37.48 214137 061709 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 39.90. 214137 061709 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 40.75 214137 061709 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 42.90 214137 061709 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 57.47 214137 061709 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 94.05 214137 061709 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 615.28 323847 612512009 100743. PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 4,261.00 214114 2765842 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.20- 214115 3413252 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.40- 214116 3413251 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.33- 214117 3413250 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2412009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 20 6/25/2009 - 6/2512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7.08- 214118 3413219 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 572.17 214238 2766509 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 743.06 214239 2769058 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,577.26 214240 2769056 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.12 214241 2769057 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 724.73 214411 2769054 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,082.39 214412 2769055 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,120.60 214413 2769053 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,062.32 323848 6/25/2009 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 65.00 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 00001068 214037 744352 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.04 BAL DUE 00001005 214204 709887REVISE 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 547.43 TIRES 00001020 214205 747805 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 268.17 TIRES 00001202 214206 750413 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 897.64 323849 612512009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 5,101.23 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 214212 061809 2210.6123 MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 5,101.23 323850 6/25/2009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 185.00 BRM PERMIT 6171000 214437 060809 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 185.00 323851 6/26/2009 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES 41.54 CABLE TIES 00001259 214314 81025 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.54 323852 6/2512009 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 240.00 WELL #20 214207 07022.22 05460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 240.00 323853 6125/2009 100971 QUALITY WINE 110.00 214119 167494 -00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,293.01 214120 169400 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,483.16 214121 170206 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,187.43 214122 170148 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 493.20 214123 168702 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10.00 214124 167921 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,408.16 214242 170147 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 212.80 214243 170209 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2412009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/25/2009 -6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 888.90 214244 169401 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,931.63 214245 170152 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,147.39 214246 170153 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,056.98 214247 170207 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 793.00 214248 170208 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20,015.66 323854 6125/2009 123898 QWEST 137.72 952 285 -2951 214168 2951 -6/09 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 137.72 323855 612512009 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 433.90 HOSE REEL, TRIMMERS 00006494 214038 CD1221327 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 148.90 IMPELLAR 00006494 214039 CD1223306 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 582.80 323856 6/25/2009 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 2,398.26 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 00008005 214315 0042842 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 2,398.26 323857 612512009 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 765.00 REPAIRS TO DRINKING FOUNTAIN 00002053 214316 11185 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 765.00 323858 6125/2009 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 1,481.46 REPLACED ELECTRICAL OUTLETS 00002050 214317 94414 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,481.46 323859 6/25/2009 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 218.94 AD FOR BID 214040 4187139 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 159.90 AD FOR BID 214370 4191740 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 560.88 AD FOR BID 214371 4191741 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 939.72 323860 6125/2009 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 106.07 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 214169 00222060 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 106.07 323861 6/2512009 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 722.95 VACUUM DRAIN 00006299 214428 0038978321 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 722.95 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 22 6/25/2009 - 6/2512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323862 6/25/2009 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 43.86 BAKERY 214372 251781 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 43.86 323863 6/25/2009 117807 SAM'S CLUB 17.82 SOUTH METRO TRAINING FACILITY 214319 053109 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 102.36 SOUTH METRO TRAINING FACILITY 214319 053109 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 120.18 323864 6/25/2009 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 109.33 101= •... "9350 214170 061709 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 10.00 101= ' "" "9350 214318 061809 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 167.54 101" ""'9350 214318 061809 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 286.87 323865 6/25/2009 123118 SAMMY'S SUBS AND SALADS 51.10 COOKIES 214320 061809 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 51.10 323866 6/25/2009 118168 SANSIO 752.96 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 214171 INVO13565 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 752.96 323867 612512009 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 762.24 FILTERS 00001177 214041 110084 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 762.24 323868 6/2512009 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 132.61 LUMBER 00001251 214172 40756029 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 132.61 323869 6/2512009 124114 SCNS SPORTS FOODS 112.80 SNACKS 214373 19804 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 112.80 323870 6/25/2009 124421 SCOTT, SYDNEY 48.07 NEW CHANGING ROOM CURTAINS 214436 061909 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 48.07 323871 6/2512009 124408 SERVRIGHT 678.50 SERVICE FOR SCANNERS 00004478 214042 210826 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 678.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/25/2009 -6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323872 6/25/2009 120761 SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES 325:00 KEYLESS ENTRY SYS SERVICE 00007124 214173 5441268273 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 325.00 KEYLESS ENTRY SYS SERVICE 00007125 214174 5441265959 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 650.00 323873 6/25/2009 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 61.50 STAFF SHIRTS 214374 14134026 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 61.50 323874 6/25/2009 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 397.00 FIRE ALARM PANEL 214043 64649561 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 430.81 STATION 1 MONITORING 214175 72925170 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 827.81 323876 6/25/2009 103689 SNAP -ON TOOLS 156.07 HEX DRIVE SET 00005299 214044 214111208 -17601 1553.6556 TOOLS 7 156.07 323876 6/25/2009 124384 SOUTHDALE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1,000.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE ADS 214375 061909 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,000.00 323877 6/25/2009 104786 SOUTHDALE PET HOSPITAL 22.13 VETERINARY EXPENSES 00007123 214176 195119 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22.13 323878. 6/25/2009 101569 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY 460.00 MMCI INST REGISTRATION (2) 214376 2009 1180.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 460.00 323879 6/25/2009 116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY - DAVIDSON 341.98 1000 MILE CHECK UP 214208 535144 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 341.98 323880 6/25/2009 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 350.00 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 214387 MAY2009 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 733.09 EDINA LIQUOR AD 214387 MAY2009 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 733.09 EDINA LIQUOR AD 214387 MAY2009 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 733.10 EDINA LIQUOR AD 214387 MAY2009 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,823.00 WANT ADS 214387 MAY2009 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 23 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ELECTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/25/2009 - 6/2512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,372.28 323881 6/2512009 101015 STRETCHERS 79.98 UNIFORM PANTS 214177 1614923 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.98 323882 6/2512009 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 181.10 COPIES 214321 6863001 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 181.10 COPIES 214322 6863002 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 181.10 COPIES 214323 6863003 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 199.42 COPIES 214324 6863004 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 742.72 323883 6/2512009 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 46.01 EMBLEM 00001019 214045 180628 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.47 EMBLEM 00001023 214325 181935 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.01- CREDIT 00001019 214423 CM180628 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.47 323884 6125/2009 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F 339.85 ABOUT TOWN COLUMN 214046 310 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 339.85 323885 6/25/2009 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS .260.00 GRAD AD 00016102 214047 1185078 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 600.00 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 214377 1186562 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 860.00 323886 6/2512009 120931 SURGE WATER CONDITIONING 280.23 SOFTENER SALT 214326 111959 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 280.23 323887 612512009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,545.00 214125 'D8722 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 454.00 214126 D8708 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,999.00 323888 6/2512009 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 214378 331072 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 38.00 323889 612 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/25/2009 - 6/2512009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,476.09 WETTING AGENT 00006493 214048 S113130 -IN 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page- 25 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 5862.5514 1,476.09 VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 323890 6125/2009 5421.5514 105123 THEMESCAPES INC. GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6,500.00 REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 214327 20949 -1 5862.5514 6,500.00 VERNON SELLING OTHER YORK SELLING 323891 6125/2009 ADVERTISING 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY VERNON SELLING 154.00 214127 546143 329.95 214379 547080 391.00 214380 546093 444.00 214381 72172 90.25 214414 546587 2,359.20 214415 546586 3,768.40 323892 6125/2009 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 350.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 214049 2009 -27404 350.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 214049 2009 -27404 350.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 214049 2009 -27404 33.33 WEBSITE AD 214328 2009 -31872 33.33 WEBSITE AD 214328 2009 -31872 33.34 WEBSITE AD 214328 2009 -31872 1,150.00 323893 6125/2009 102284 TILE SHOP, THE 952.05 ENTRYWAY TILE 00002235 214329 2475644 952.05 323894 6/2512009 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 102.50 DRAFT MINUTES 6/2109 214050 M17075 102.50 323895 6/25/2009 121309 TOBIN CINEMA SYSTEMS INC. 259.52 PROJECTOR REPAIR 00009041 214178 8759 259.52 323896 6/25/2009 101038 TOLL GAS S WELDING SUPPLY 63.14 ARGON 00006470 214382 262769 63.14 323897 6125/2009 101042 TRIARCO 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page- 25 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 101.56 CITY OF EDINA 687708 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE Council Check Register 101.56 612512009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 132.35 ACRYLICS, WATERCOLORS 00009033 214179 78515 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 132.35 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 214209 061809 1470.4329 323898 6/25/2009 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 288.00 225.20 UNIFORM SHIRTS 00002049 214330 11649 5630.6201 LAUNDRY 323901 225.20 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 323899 612512009 100682 TRUGREEN LAWNCARE 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 26 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES 101.56 WEED CONTROL 00001176 214051 687708 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 101.56 323900 6125/2009 124416 TRUMAN, ANGELA 288.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 214209 061809 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 288.00 323901 6/25/2009 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 792.70 PHYSICAL EXAMS 214180 101557641 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 792.70 323902 6/25/2009 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 24.00 HINGES 00005988 214052 352533 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 24.00 323903 6/25/2009 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 270.78 FERTILIZER 00005985 214053 21151 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 101.18 GRASS SEED 00001262 214181 21216 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 371.96 323904 612512009 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,268.42 UNIFORMS 214210 053109 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,268.42 323905 6/2512009 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 17.42 SWITCH PLATE 00001358 214182 049172 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.42 323906 612512009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 45.00 TURF DISEASE ANALYSIS 214183 9- 146 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 45.00 323907 6/2512009 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 10.93 SHIPPING CHARGES 214331 TRAN:5848 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENE' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6125/2009 -6125/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 10.93 323908 6/2512009 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 1,020.29 MANHOLE LID EXTRACTORS 00001109 214054 830412 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.41 SEWER MANHOLE DECALS 00001100 214055 830312 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,438.50 TRACER BOXES 00001100 214056 829445 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,485.20 323909 612512009 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 67.85 OXYGEN 00003649 214057 824542 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 267.74 OXYGEN 00003649 214058 724390 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 220.61 OXYGEN 00003649 214059 731500 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 556.20 323910 6/2512009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 683.14 TISSUE, LINERS 00005993 214060 124245 -00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 264.45 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 214184 124770 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 57.25 SOAP 00003545 214185 124504 -01 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 98.37 ROLL TOWEL, NAPKINS 00003545 214186 124504 -00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 174.00 CUP LIDS 214383 124413 -00 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 396.25 TABLECOVERS 214384 124408 -00 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,673.46 323911 6125/2009 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 1.46 214332 2023659102 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 32.07 214438 2024495117 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36.54 214438 2024495117 1640.6188 TELEPHONE 192.68 214438 2024495117 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 280.56 214438 2024495117 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 322.86 214438 2024495117 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 866.17 323912 6125/2009 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 104.54 STARTER BRUSHES 00006497 214061 42415 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,100.00 LEASE CARTS 00006278 214385 42577 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 2,204.54 323913 612512009 119612 VIDEO GUIDANCE INC. 140.40 PANEL REPAIRS 214187 091636 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 140.40 323914 612512009 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 27 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION GOLF CARS GOLF CARS FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Council Check Register Page - 28 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 230.00 SPRINKLER TESTING 214333 135598 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 230.00 323915 6125/2009 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 266.00 214128 27256 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266.00 323916 6/25/2009 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 195.50 214249 12855 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 195.50 323917 6/25/2009 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 724.93 CONCESSION PRODUCT 214062 25744054 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 59.06 CAN LINERS 214188 25763859 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,024.79 CONCESSION PRODUCT 214188 25763859 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,808.78 323918 6125/2009 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 265.00 IGNITOR 00001260 214211 15130966 -00 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 265.00 323919 612512009 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 412.16 ENVELOPES 00009046 214334 25885 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 358.91 RECEIPTS 00009047 214335 25884 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 501.62 ART CENTER LETTERHEAD 00009045 214336 25886 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,272.69 323920 6125/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 449.15 214250 220229 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 312.30 214251 220230 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 798.45 214252 220231 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,559.90 323921 6/2512009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 888.68 214129 277192 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 226.24 214253 278093 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 578.22 214254 278095 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.27- 214255 43512 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,684.87 323922 6/25" - 1 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 51.40 214130 244273 1842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6125/2009 - 6125/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,612.15 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 214131 244272 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,832.34 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 214132 244271 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6.93- COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 214133 778903 5822.5513 9.33- 214134 778924 5842.5513 81.05- 214135 779114 5842.5513 229.78- 214136 779115 5842.5512 8,828.25 214256 244274 5842.5512 111.61 214257 244275 5842.5515 32.52 214258 244270 5822.5515 512.73 214259 244269 5822.5512 57.10 214260 244268 5822.5515 375.59 214261 244266 5822.5513 370.55 214262 244267 5822.5513 6,294.78 214263 244265 5862.5512 3,942.60 214264 244263 5862.5513 73.10 214265 244264 5862.5515 2,150.85 214266 244262 5862.5513 383.83 214416 244834 5842.5512 115.33 214417 244261 5862.5515 26,417.64 323923 6/26/2009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 567.70 214418 230649 5822.5513 129.95- 214419 230301 5822.5513 437.75 323924 6125/2009 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 185.00 214420 6017 5842.5513 185.00 323925 6/2512009 122316 ZACK'S INC. 877.78 BROOMS, SHOVELS, SLEDGEHAMMENS1243 214063 25043 1301.6556 161.24 BRUSHES, HAMMERS 00001243 214064 25044 1301.6556 1,039.02 323926 6/25/2009 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 567.30 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 214337 54165042 5621.6610 132.82- CREDIT 214338 54165097 5621.6610 153.43 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 214386 54165175 1551.6406 587.91 323927 6/2612009 101091 23EGLER INC 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 29 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/25/2009 — 6/25/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 214065 E6395903 1551.6180 340.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 214189 E6076410 1470.6215 790.00 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,434,263.04 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,434,263.04 Total Payments 1,434,263.04 6/24/2009 7:35:36 Page - 30 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF . .A 6/241i /:36:45 Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/25/2009 - 6/25/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 52,461.77 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 7,207.37 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,830.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 215,157.10 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 6,996.65 05100 ART CENTER FUND 5,890.94 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 179.25 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 17,301.77 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 26,854.28 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 9,922.11 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 20,400.89 05800 LIQUOR FUND 177,647.42 05900 UTILITY FUND 793,395.95 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 97,562.80 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,454.74 Report Totals 1,434,263.04 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 1 6/29/2009 -7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323929 6/29/2009 103069 EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 1,000.00 EVENT CO- SPONSORSHIP 214901 062909 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 1,000.00 323930 71212009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 71.60 214603 0802621 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 35.40 214604 0722309 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 36.60 214605 0802603 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 48.60 214606 0802618 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 72.55 214836 0722362 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 117.00 214898 0802722 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 381.75 323931 71212009 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 242.90 VEHICLE REPAIRS 214903 6728 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 242.90 323932 7/2/2009 119813 AERIAL PAINTING INC. 1,500.00 REPAINTING BRIDGE WALL 00001415 214800 88 1343.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 2,500.00 PAINT BRIDGE RAILINGS 00001420 214801 89 1343.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 4,000.00 323933 7/212009 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 528.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214711 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 528.00 323934 71212009 105086 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSOCIATI 173.00 DUES - GARY WELLS 00001293 214560 AAA09 5923.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 173.00 323935 7/212009 101674 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 527.71 IRRIGATION RADIO 214439 9892 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 527.71 323936 7/212009 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 504.00 GIFT SHOP ATTENDENT 214712 062509 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 504.00 323937 7/212009 124433 ANDERSON, MARLYN 292.84 STORAGE SHED MATERIALS 214713 062509 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 292.84 R55CKREG LOG20000 PERFORMANCE 7114/09 214550 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 CITY OF EDINA 323946 7/2/2009 116724 BARNES, DOROTHY 22.00 PROGRAM REFUND 214541 062209 1628.4392.09 Council Check Register 22.00 323947 7 /2/20ng 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 6/29/2009 — 7/2/2009 CONSULTING DESIGN LS41 LIFT STATION; 3 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323938 7/212009 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 1,013.07 FOOD 214671 1174738 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,013.07 323939 7/2/2009 103065 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 193.59 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001096 214904 30751 01214.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 193.59 323940 7/2/2009 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 86.11 CHEMICAL FEED TUBES 214746 34262 5311.6545 CHEMICALS 978.22 POOL LEVOLOR 214905 34274 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,064.33 323941 7/212009 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 88.27 RELAY COIL 00001239 214440 10056528 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS 88.27 323942 7/212009 123066 ATLANTIS IRRIGATION LLC 115.90 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001803 214906 2344 05469.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 115.90 323943 71212009 120995 AVR INC. 708.00 CONCRETE 00005448 214441 20630 1314.6520 CONCRETE 796.50 CONCRETE 00005013 214442 20782 5913.6520 CONCRETE 189.00 CONCRETE 00005013 214672 20705 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 1,693.50 323944 71212009 100638 BACHMAN'S 25.29 PLANTS 00001388 214561 13142 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 113.83 PLANTS 00001388 214562 13141 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 139.12 323945 7/212009 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 6/3012009 15:37:56 Page - 2 Business Unit GRILL PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS WM-469 NORTH PROMENADE STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION PATHS & HARD SURFACE GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7114/09 214550 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323946 7/2/2009 116724 BARNES, DOROTHY 22.00 PROGRAM REFUND 214541 062209 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 323947 7 /2/20ng 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 800.75 LIFT STATION STUDY 214908 23271029.00 -4 0041.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LS41 LIFT STATION; 3 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 3 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 800.75 LIFT STATION STUDY 214908 23271029.00 -4 10042.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LS42 LIFT STATION 7 REHAB 2,224.80 STORMWATER MGMT 214909 23270354.00 -171 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,826.30 323948 71212009 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 170.31 BATTERIES 00004332 214907 18- 243253 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 170.31 323949 71212009 116151 BCA - BTS 150.00 INTOXILYZER CLASSES 214443 061809 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 323950 7/212009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 374.10 214607 49390300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,612.50 214608 49387200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 225.35 214609 49390400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 122.55 214610 49387300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,116.03 214899 49466000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,450.53 323951 7/2/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 53.72 ADDRESS LABELS 214747 WO- 566260 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 53.72 323952 71212009 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 37.26 TOILET SERVICE 00001193 214673 16398 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 69.94 TOILET SERVICES 00001194 214674 16399 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 107.20 323953 71212009 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 214553 070209 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 323954 71212009 103879 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CENTER 37.10 SOD ROLLER RENTAL 00002257 214802 62639 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 37.10 323955 71212009 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 648.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214714 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 648.00 323956 71212009 122942 BORNOWSKI, CLAY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 292.00 MAINTENANCE 214715 062509 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1470.6510 1470.6510 1470.6510 1470.6510 5842.5513 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 6130/2009 15:37:56 Page - 4 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 01363.1705.20 292.00 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4402.6710 323957 71212009 05436.1705.20 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 414.60 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003544 214748 87070602 2,173.80 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003544 214749 87069643 1,293.12 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003512 214750 87066604 257.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003512 214751 87067646 4,138.62 323958 71212009 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 620.00 214837 95909 620.00 323959 71212009 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 3,480.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 214910 308164 1,451.20 ABATEMENT DESIGN 214911 308098 2,615.55 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 214912 308399 935.50 MATERIALS TESTING 214913 308151 8,482.25 323960 7/212009 103279 BRETSON, GREG 103.25 COPPER PIPE 214945 062909 103.25 323961 7/2/2009 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 868.00 PARKING RAMP DOOR 00001263 214563 5110295 868.00 323962 7/212009 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 PERFORMANCE 7/14/09 214551 062209 200.00 323963 71212009 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 371.90 3/4" LIMESTONE 214675 061509 475.90 BALLFIELD LIME 214675 061509 847.80 323964 7/2/2009 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 214552 070209 100.00 1470.6510 1470.6510 1470.6510 1470.6510 5842.5513 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 6130/2009 15:37:56 Page - 4 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 01363.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 05436.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1375.6530 5631.6136 5422.6517 1642.6542 1419.6102 REPAIR PARTS BA -363 BLAKE RD M &O PW BUILDING PW BUILDING PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM DISTRIBUTION PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION SAND GRAVEL & ROCK INFIELD MIXTURE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIELD MAINTENANCE RESERVE PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register • Page - 5 6/29/2009 -7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323965 7/212009 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 5,849.16 ASPHALT 00005445 214444 7145MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 3,329.21 ASPHALT 00005445 214564 7150MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 9,178.37 323966 71212009 102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/6/09 214544 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 323967 71212009 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 48.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 214716 062509 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 57.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214716 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 105.00 323968 71212009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,694.55 214611 15450 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15.10 214612 15448 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 82.35 214613 15439 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 556.20 214614 15440 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 82.95 214838 15504 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,431.15 323969 7/212009 124442 CAREER PARTNERS 20.00 RENTAL REFUND 214914 062509 1600.4722.03 ARNESON ACRES RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 20.00 323970 7/212009 117600 CARLSON, JOHN 270.00 FAMILY FESTIVAL 7/11/09 214536 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 270.00 323971 71212009 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 90.00 PRINTER REPAIRS 214445 081609 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 90.00 323972 71212009 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 18.14 5596524 -8 214676 061609 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,881.59 5591458 -4 214752 061909 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 38.69 8033998 -9 214753 JUN1909 1552.6186 , HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 38.69 8034001 -1 214754 6/19/09 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 767.16 214803 062209 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,744.27 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA ' 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 6 6129/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323973 71212009 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 150.00 JAZZ ON THE PRAIRIE 7/13109 214549 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 323974 71212009 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 260.93 UTILITY ACCT ERROR 214755 062209 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 260.93 323975 71212009 123941 CLAY, CAROL 110.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214717 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 110.00 323976 71212009 116304 CLAY, DON 695.25 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 214718 062509 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 695.25 323977 7/212009 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 378.83 ASPHALT 00005445 214446 061509 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 378.83 323978 7/212009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 259.12 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001354 214447 03481254 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 35.00 GLOVES, SUNSCREEN 00001356 214565 03482001 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 112.70 GLOVES, SUNSCREEN 00001356 214565 03482001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 111.47 DUCT TAPE, RESPIRATORS 00001379 214804 03483966 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 518.29 323979 7/212009 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 162.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214719 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 162.00 323980 7/212009 121384 CVS WHOLESALE FLAGS 596.00 PARADE FLAGS 214756 100669396 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 596.00 323981 71212009 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 260.93 3/4" WATER METER 00001296 214448 6080361 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 3,782.88 WATER METERS 00001289 214566 6092383 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 4,043.81 323982 7/212009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,532.11 214615 509395 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 7 6/29/2009 -7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,525.25 214839 509394 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,057.36 323983 7/212009 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 206.45 609425 WATER 214449 6762770 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 206.45 323984 7/212009 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 130.00 TUBE CUTTERS, WRENCH 00001204 214567 393449 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.57 ACCESSORY SETS 00001204 214568 393764 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.05 WRENCH SET 00001204 214569 393729 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.84 STYLUS 00001204 214570 394828 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 207.46 323985 712/2009 103436 DENECKE, LEILA 456.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214720 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 456.00 323986 712/2009 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 65.07 BAKERY 214677 302035 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 74.58 BAKERY 214678 304017 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 59.30 BAKERY 214679 304018 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 44.88 BAKERY 214757 304395 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 243.83 323987 71212009 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 45.80 MAINTENANCE LOGS 214805 34988 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 45.80 323988 71212009 101766 DISPLAY SALES 603.86 PARK FLAGS 214710 INV0067611 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 603.86 323989 71212009 121156 DMM INDUSTRIES 286.15 PADDLE WHEEL PART 00002038 214806 30698 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 286.15 323990 71212009 124438 DONNAY HOMES 79.98 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 214915 062609 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 79.98 323991 71212009 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/29/2009 — 7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 682.70 CAUSTIC SODA 214450 82700900 -09 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 682.70 323992 7/212009 116357 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC. 919.38 MCQUAY ENGINEERING 214807 201000681 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 919.38 323993 7/212009 123253 DYNAMIC PUBLISHING LLC 2,300.00 CALENDAR ADVERTISING 214680 100015 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 2,300.00 323994 71212009 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 74.95 WINE 214758 102 - 6/05/09 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 74.95 323995 7/212009 124429 EDINA PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINES 190.70 EDINA ART FAIR TENT 214721 062509 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 190.70 323996 7/2/2009 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 90.00 GYM USE - PERMIT #31600 214916 8105 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 90.00 323997 712/2009 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 1,061.81 IMPELLER 00001298 214451 0038909 -IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,061.81 323998 71212009 119824 ELIFEGUARD INC. 432.94 LIFEGUARD WHISTLES 214452 17339 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 432.94 323999 71212009 106194 EMA INC. 6,400.00 WELL #20 SCADA SETUP 214759 B05604.053 -2 05480.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM -480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 1,360.00 SCADA REPAIRS 214760 B05604.052 -2 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 7,760.00 324000 71212009 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 2,372.68 T -90 REPAIRS 214761 42627 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,372.68 324001 7/212009 124425 ENGEL, DANIEL 98.48 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 214540 062209 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE S! R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/29/2009 — 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No — Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 98.48 324002 71212009 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 6,869.25 MANHOLE COVERS 00005453 214571 MM2100 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 6,869.25 324003 71212009 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 725.27 NO SMOKING SIGNS 00002054 214681 190 -36320 5650.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE 725.27 324004 71212009 100766 FEDERAL EXPRESS 13.01 SHIPPING CHARGES 214917 9- 235 -94980 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 13.01 324005 712/2009 124431 FERGUSON, DANA 120.00 MODEL 214722 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.00 324006 71212009 112704 FESLER, EDDI 795.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 214723 062509 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 795.00 324007 712/2009 118715 FESLER, RICHARD 58.44 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 214724 062509 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 58.44 324008 71212009 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 70.98 STRAINER SCREEN 00001300 214453 12587 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 70.98 324009 71212009 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 58.95 COIL ASSEMBLY 00001201 214454 66780100 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.95 324010 71212009 122477 GAGER, CATHY 171.00 CRAFT SUPPLIES 214725 062509 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 171.00 324011 7/212009 124424 GARVEY CONSTRUCTION INC. 2,495.00 CONCRETE IN DOG PARK 00001183 214455 801230 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,345.50 CONCRETE IN DOG PARK 00001191 214456 801231 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 4,840.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 324012 71212009 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 17.10 ON/OFF SWITCH 214457 1132516 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 17.10 324013 71212009 100774 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE 393.31 REPAIRED IMPELLERS 00001276 214458 33917 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT 158.15 SWITCH 00001353 214459 33942 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 551.46 324014 71212009 103185 GERTENS 29.39 PLANTS, PLAYGROUND CHIPS 00001168 214682 174594 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 330.15 PLANTINGS 00005585 214683 168018 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 359.54 324015 712/2009 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 336.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214726 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 336.00 324016 71212009 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214727 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 480.00 324017 71212009 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 56.45 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00001187 214686 414 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 56.45 324018 71212009 101103 GRAINGER 311.35 COUPLERS, LOPPERS 00006302 214460 9012553104 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 37.54 HINGES 00006300 214461 9009990939 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 252.42 PAINT, HAMMERS 00001269 214462 9014176110 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 85.21 CLOCK 00001362 214463 9016886092 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 189.92 TARP STRAPS, PAINT 00001357 214464 9016428519 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 205.80 SAFETY GAS CANS 00001357 214464 9016428519 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.43 FILTERS, PLIERS 00001366 214762 9017684714 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 20.55 BATTERIES 00001380 214763 9018744863 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,174.22 324019 71212009 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 282.25 214616 111065 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 639.00 214617 110937 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 583.50 214618 110936 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 6/3012009 15:37:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 6/29/2009 -7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 207.50 214619 111064 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,266.25 214840 111074 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 156.00- 214841 111072 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 146.25 214842 111110 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,968.75 324020 71212009 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 53.44 TV CONVERTER BOX 214684 062309 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 53.44 TV CONVERTER BOX 214684 062309 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 45.93 CALCULATOR, PAPER 214685 062409 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 152.81 324021 71212009 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 384.48 STARTUP IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001376 214465 091438 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 732.34 STARTUP IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001376 214466 091439 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 1,116.82 324022 7/2/2009 118195 GREEN HORIZONS 531.21 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005919 214918 145554 01214.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 185.96 SPRINKLER REPAIR 214919 145380 01214.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 717.17 324023 712/2009 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 285.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214728 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 285.00 324024 7/2/2009 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 4,736.00 GROUP LESSONS 214764 062409 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 13,999.00 ADULT LESSONS 214764 062409 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10,650.00 3RD QTR PAYMENT 214834 062609 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 29,385.00 324025 71212009 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 534.61 HEDGE TRIMMER 00001159 214687 10661 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 534.61 324026 7/212009 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 PERFORMANCE 7/7109 214546 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 250.00 324027 712/2009 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 2,172.83 DIESEL GAS 00001437 214467 SO10016271 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CHEMICALS 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page - 12 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT POOL OPERATION WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT POOL OPERATION CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL BOARD & ROOM PRISONER . LEGAL SERVICES LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 2,172.83 324028 71212009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,745.90 CHEMICALS 00005451 214468 3029505 5915.6586 588.95 CHLORINE 214469 3029504 5311.6545 5,002.50 CHEMICALS 00005451 214470 3029131 5915.6586 6,400.00 CHEMICALS 00005451 214808 3031503 5915.6586 1,555.15 PUMP - 00001303 214809 3031685 5915.6406 916.29 CHLORINE, CAUSTIC SODA 214920 3031782 5311.6545 18,208.79 324029 7/212009 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 35.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 214729 062509 5125.6564 295.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 214729 062509 5125.6103 330.00 324030 71212009 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 348.26 HYD EXTENSION 00001359 214471 9118575 5913.6530 371.47 WATERMAIN REPAIR CLAMPS 00001294 214472 9100826 5913.6530 719.73 324031 71212009 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 377.10 PIZZA 214688 1503326 5421.5510 377.10 324032 71212009 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,265.25 ROOM S BOARD - MAY 2009 214473 2009 5 -EDINA 1195.6225 1,265.25 324033 7/212009 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 797.15 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005510 214474 83748 1642.6544 797.15 324034 71212009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 504.00 214843 490059 5822.5514 25.95 214844 490058 5842.5515 826.05 214845 490057 5842.5514 1,356.00 324035 7/212009 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 715/09 214543 062209 5631.6136 100.00 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CHEMICALS 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page - 12 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT POOL OPERATION WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT POOL OPERATION CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL BOARD & ROOM PRISONER . LEGAL SERVICES LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3012009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/29/2009 —7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 324036 7/212009 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 56.52 POOL SIGNAGE 00002251 214810 9061017 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 56.52 324037 71212009 124446 HORNADY 970.00 TRAINING AMMO 214921 575922 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 970.00 324038 7/2/2009 119094 HUMANA DENTAL 1,092.34 PREMIUM 214811 931739980 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 10,487.31 PREMIUM 214811 931739980 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 11,579.65 324039 7/7/2009 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 998.94 CONCESSION PRODUCT 214475 125850 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 998.94 324040 71212009 101468 IIMC 90.00 DUES - JANE TIMM 214922 20252 -2009 1180.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ELECTION 90.00 324041 71212009 104696 INT'L SECURITY PRODUCTS 28.76 FENCE LUMBER 00006286 214476 28216 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 28.76 324042 7/2/2009 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 93.05 FENCE REPAIR 00001091 214923 120624 01214.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 93.05 324043 712/2009 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 139.42 STRAIN RELIEF 00001271 214477 4228139 -01 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 139.42 324044 7/2/2009 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 214557 070209 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 324045 71212009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,874.85 214620 949775 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 257.90 214621 1269183 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 67.50 214622 1286215 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/29/2009 -7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 87.50 214689 1292236 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 351.00 214690 1290049 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 177.95 214765 950527 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 6,557.58 214846 1284967 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 67.50 214847 1286222 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 114.25 214848 1284957 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,089.20 214849 1284956 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 12,645.23 324046 71212009 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 2,113.54 MERIT 00006040 214478 51627151 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,113.54 324047 712/2009 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD 56.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 214812 062509 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 56.96 324049 7/2/2009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 480.96 214623 1649669 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,292.19 214624 1649656 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 426.49 214625 1649651 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 230.99 214626 1649650 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,482.90 214627 1649649 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,306.10 214628 1649648 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 479.53 214629 1649647 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 30.50 214630 1645877 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,255.39 214631 1649659 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 133.25 214850 1653553 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,070.25 214850 1653553 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 666.02 214851 1653550 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 487.61 214852 1653549 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,362.54 214853 1653552 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 283.41 214854 1653551 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 36.11 214855 1653564 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,951.63 214856 1653568 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 152.12 214857 1653566 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,644.91 214858 1653563 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,057.69 214859 1653567 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 214860 1653554 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,510.84 214861 1653565 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,324.13 214862 1653562 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 112.12 214863 1653557 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/29/2009 - 7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,311.65 214864 1653555 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 559.88 214865 1653560 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,006.01 214866 1653561 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,586.28 214867 1653558 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,227.05 214868 1653559 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,338.60 214869 1638217 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,400.27 214870 1653556 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 38,208.54 324050 71212009 118013 KAIROS DANCE THEATRE 100.00 ADVERTISING 214730 062509 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 324051 71212009 103449 KAMPA, TINA 86.50 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 214766 062509 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 86.50 324052 71212009 111018 KEEPRS INC. 183.96 UNIFORMS 00003530 214767 119442 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39.99 UNIFORMS 00003872 214768 113119 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 389.97 UNIFORMS 00003532 214769 119331 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 519.96 UNIFORMS 00003511 214770 119330 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 232.97 UNIFORMS 00003549 214771 120001 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 519.96 UNIFORMS 00003530 214772 119442 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 76.99 UNIFORMS 00003870 214773 120189 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 227.96 UNIFORMS 00003549 214774 120001 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,191.76 324053 7/212009 105990 KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION INC. 245.18 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00005906 214924 55835 01214.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 245.18 324054 712/2009 124439 KESSLER, WENDY .74 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 214925 062509 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 9.95 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 214925 062509 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 10.69 324055 71212009 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 1,673.11 DRAFT FEASIBILITY REPORT 214926 3884861 01237.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -237 50TH &FRANCE RENOVATION 1,673.11 324056 712/2009 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6130/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/29/2009 - 7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 652.80 INSTRUCTOR AC 214731 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 652.80 324057 71212009 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 158.00 JUNE SERVICE 214572 060109 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 158.00 324058 7/2/2009 101332 KOJETIN, ROBERT 402.88 WOOD SCULPTURES SUPPLIES 214479 060809 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 402.88 324059 7/212009 106094 KOUTSKY, DEAN 180.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 214732 062509 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 180.00 324060 7/212009 118334 KULLY SUPPLY INC. 128.71 DRINKING FOUNTAIN PARTS 00005813 214691 SI- 126759 - 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 128.71 324061 712/2009 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 24.48 LOGO CLOTHING 214927 07667734 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 24.48 324062 71212009 102661 LAWN RANGER, THE 160.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001087 214926 45771 01213.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 160.50 324063 71212009 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 225.54 FITTINGS, WASHERS 00001363 214813 8196990 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 225.54 324064 71212009 124444 LEE, CHELSEA 210.00 CREATE ACTIVITIES/TRAIN STAFF 214929 061909 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 210.00 324065 71212009 124426 LINDBLOM, JOAN 145.00 RENTAL REFUND 214542 062209 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 145.00 324066 71212009 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 89.70 COPIER USAGE 00001512 214814 1023583 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING - 89.70 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 324067 7/2/2009 324068 7/212009 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/29/2009 -7/2/2009 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 324069 7/2/2009 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 86.80 EVIDENCE ROOM SUPPLIES 214932 203481 86.80 324070 7/212009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 36.30 214900 64706 36.30 324071 71212009 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 947.02 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00003547 214779 1537 947.02 324072 7/2/2009 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 2,012.85 STRIP BROOMS 00001373 214573 2093968 1160.6160 5910.6160 5410.6103 1554.6103 1554.6160 5910.6160 1554.6710 1400.6160 1190.6160 5910.6160 1554.6103 5910.6160 1554.6710 1554.6160 1190.6160 1554.6103 05469.1705.30 04363.1705.30 01364.1705.30 10095.1705.30 07102.1705.30 1400.6406 5842.5515 1470.6511 1310.6523 Subledger Account Description DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CLEANING SUPPLIES BROOMS 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page- 17 Business Unit FINANCE GENERAL (BILLING) GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ASSESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS WM-469 NORTH PROMENADE STS -363 PROMENADE PHASE 2 BA -364 PROMENADE PHASE 2 BR5 PROMENADE BRIDGE @ YORK 5102 PROMENADE IMP PHASE I POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET CLEANING 100858 LOGIS 911.70 INQUIRY LICENSE 214692 30855 63.25 214775 30493,30456 289.90 214775 30493,30456 1,632.00 214775 30493,30456 3,366.08 214775 30493,30456 76.50 214776 30530 1,110.45 214776 30530 2,254.56 214776 30530 6,800.00 214776 30530 14.58 214777 30680,30702 432.00 214777 30680,30702 47.70 214778 30785,30813 447.30 214778 30785,30813 547.14 214778 30785,30813 913.24 214778 30785,30813 1,104.00 214778 30785,30813 20,010.40 124435 LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2,403.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 214930 070209 2,403.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 214930 070209 33,872.06 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 214930 070209 39,566.61 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 214930 070209 52,736.21 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 214930 070209 130,981.04 324069 7/2/2009 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 86.80 EVIDENCE ROOM SUPPLIES 214932 203481 86.80 324070 7/212009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 36.30 214900 64706 36.30 324071 71212009 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 947.02 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00003547 214779 1537 947.02 324072 7/2/2009 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 2,012.85 STRIP BROOMS 00001373 214573 2093968 1160.6160 5910.6160 5410.6103 1554.6103 1554.6160 5910.6160 1554.6710 1400.6160 1190.6160 5910.6160 1554.6103 5910.6160 1554.6710 1554.6160 1190.6160 1554.6103 05469.1705.30 04363.1705.30 01364.1705.30 10095.1705.30 07102.1705.30 1400.6406 5842.5515 1470.6511 1310.6523 Subledger Account Description DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CLEANING SUPPLIES BROOMS 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page- 17 Business Unit FINANCE GENERAL (BILLING) GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ASSESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS WM-469 NORTH PROMENADE STS -363 PROMENADE PHASE 2 BA -364 PROMENADE PHASE 2 BR5 PROMENADE BRIDGE @ YORK 5102 PROMENADE IMP PHASE I POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET CLEANING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 18 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,012.85 324073 71212009 100868 MARK VII SALES 5,763.40 214632 480904 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 74.40 214633 480905 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,979.35 214634 479754 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 392.00 214780 481969 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 60.00 214902 482972 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8,269.15 324074 71212009 100079 MASON, THOMAS 70.60 UNIFORM PURCHASE 214480 062309 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.60 324075 7/212009 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 4,675.00 NETWORK DVR & CAM 00003513 214781 430299 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 4,675.00 - 324076 71212009 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 214.86 214815 607301969 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 214.86 324077 712/2009 103319 MEDALIST CONCERT 13AND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 718/09 214547 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 324078 71212009 101483 MENARDS 466.81 LAWNMOWER, SHEARS 00006301 214481 48634 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 30.10 ADHESIVE, TIE -DOWNS 00001572 214482 50568 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 228.70 C- CLAMPS, GEL ROCKERS 00001365 214574 51312 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 42.66 HAMMER, LEVEL 00001360 214575 50873 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 50.29 DUCT TAPE, RUST REMOVER 00006296 214693 50302 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 26.60 HOSE REEL CART 00001361 214694 50876 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 77.68 MAGNET WANDS, PITCH FORK 00001182 214695 51204 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 922.84 324079 71212009 101987 MENARDS 458.21 PAINT & SUPPLIES 00002061 214816 92576 5630.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES 258.70 FERTILIZER, ROUNDUP 00002261 214817 93891 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 716.91 324080 712 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/29/2009 — 7/2/2009 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 269.98 TENNIS BALLS 214576 116470 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 451.13 FIELD PAINT 00001167 214696 116412 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 721.11 324081 7/2/2009 102068 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRA 1,385.36 BOILER REPAIR 214818 205047343 5620.8180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 728.00 BOILER REPAIR 214819 205047341 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,113.36 324082 71212009 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 6/25 214931 062609 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 324083 71212009 110506 MID AMERICA METER INC. 3,308.91 DEHUMIDIFIER 00001282 214577 09 -280 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,308.91 324084 71212009 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 954.00 ASPHALT 00005445 214484 99550MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 954.00 324085 7/212009 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 1,178.05 SUPPLIES 214485 28310 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,231.14 SUPPLIES 214485 28310 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,409.19 324086 71212009 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 392.16 GAS 00006204 214486 45094 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 383.25 DIESEL 00006205 214487 45095 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 330.89 GAS 00006204 214488 45093 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 1,106.30 324087 7/212009 101604 MIDWEST GANG INVESTIGATORS ASS 300.00 MGIA CONFERENCE - DOUG WAGNHOD03080 214578 060109 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 324088 7/2/2009 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,090.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001301 214489 33438 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,200.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001292 214490 33437 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,200.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001291 214491 33436 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 6,490.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 20 6/29/2009 — 7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 324089 71212009 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 170.69 METER FLANGES 00001326 214492 0236338 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 2,157.69 WATER METERS 00005216 214579 0240095 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 2,328.38 324090 71212009 101556 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC. 66.50 SHREDDING 214782 253436610 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66.50 324091 71212009 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 1,057.39 BUTTERFLY VALVE 00001062 214580 0080880 -IN 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 200.26 PUMP 00001207 214581 0080879 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,257.65 324092 7/212009 102577 MISTER CAR WASH 1,431.31 CAR WASHES 00003139 214483 MAY091244 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,431.31 324093 71212009 122241 MONAHAN, KIMBERLY 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214733 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.00 324094 7/212009 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 150.17 BUSINESS CARDS 00003548 214783 5449 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.17 324095 712/2009 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 FAMILY FESTIVAL 7111109 214537 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 324096 71212009 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 198.14 FILTERS, SEALS 00006041 214493 677772 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,401.80 HEAD PARTS 00006042 214494 677861 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 364.72 IRRIGATION HEADS 00002037 214820 676022 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,964.66 324097 71212009 100916 MUZAK 221.03 MUSIC SERVICE 214821 A503507 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 221.03 324098 71212009 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHI 200.00 AD 214697 44955 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRAT' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/29/2009 -712/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 200.00 324099 7/212009 101958 NICOL, JANET 459.38 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 214734 062509 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 459.38 324100 7/212009 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 214556 070209 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 324101 7/2/2009 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 74.98 LED LIGHTS 00001007 214582 21113 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.98 324102 71212009 100712 NORTHERN WATERWORKS SUPPLY 31.95 CABLE ASSEMBLY 00001272 214495 501201909.001 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 276.67 STAT RODS 00001282 214496 S01201214.001 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 308.62 324103 71212009 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 142.14 HIGHLIGHT CLEANER, MIST 00001265 214784 5023980 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 142.14 324104 71212009 120282 O'SULLIVAN, DIANA 250.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214735 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 250.00 324105 7/212009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 21.52 ADHESIVE, THERMAL ROLLS 00006034 214698 478306634 - 001 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 21.52 324106 71212009 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 267.41 CHAIN, SHACKLES 00001257 214497 553739 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 290.90 SCREWDRIVERS, WRENCHES 00001242 214498 553565 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 558.31 324107 7/2/2009 118891 OLSEN, LYNN 58.92 UNIFORM PURCHASE 214933 062609 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.92 324108 71212009 124441 OLSON, MICHELLE 8.86 SEASON TICKET REFUND 214934 062509 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 119.42 SEASON TICKET REFUND 214699 128.28 5421.5510 324109 7/212009 321.14 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 214785 28752879 6,146.50 SKATING LESSONS POOL CONCESSIONS 950.91 6,146.50 214786 324110 7/2/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD 102440 PASS, GRACE 2,485.75 360.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 400.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 760.00 324111 7/212009 1 Rill 7Q 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 214934 062509 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 214822 062609 5510.6103 214736 062509 5110.6103 214736 062509 5112.6103 214635 8226280 -IN 5822.5513 214871 8226289 -IN 5862.5513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page - 22 Business Unit AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES ARENA ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 324112 7/212009 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,213.70 214699 28752867 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 321.14 214785 28752879 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 950.91 214786 28752906 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,485.75 324113 71212009 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 725.00 TREE REPLACEMENT 214935 060909 01351.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -351 APPLE LANE 725.00 324114 7/2/2009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 637.31 214636 2769050 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 56.12 214637 2769049 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,236.43 214638 2769052 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,259.80 214872 2772177 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 404.70 214873 2772178 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 947.24 214874 2772179 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355.20 214875 2772176 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 993.49 214876 2772174 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 249.19 214877 2772175 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 196.31 214878 2772182 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 905.38 214879 2772183 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 98.24 214880 2772181 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,814.35 214881 2772180 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 79.36 214882 2772184 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 23 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 17.77- 214883 3413905 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,215.35 324115 71212009 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 275.88 AED BATTERY 214499 PH599481 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 275.88 324116 71212009 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 39.00 FLAT REPAIR 00001068 214500 767910 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,185.41 TIRES 00001025 214501 767783 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,224.41 324117 71212009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 1,750.00 EDINA ART CENTER POSTAGE 214737 062509 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,750.00 324118 71212009 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 2,428.20 FAIRWAY FERTILIZER 00006304 214502 33060 5431.6540 FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 2,428.20 324119 71212009 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 2,455.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 214936 07037.19 05480.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 2,455.00 324120 71212009 103094 PROTECTION ONE 152.13 ALARM MONITORING 00008007 214503 061009 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 152.13 324121 7/2/2009 100971 QUALITY WINE 2,529.87 214639 172847 -00 5842.5512 "COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 285.60 214640 172785 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 662.24 214641 172140 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,787.90 214642 172889 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,252.01 214643 172786 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,023.23 214644 172679 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 424.40 214645 172141 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 273.80 214646 172787 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.50 214647 172676 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 9.33- 214648 167738 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10.61- 214649 164167 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.76- 214650 164324 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.66- 214651 164183 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 5.17 - 31.34- 8.90- 8.90- 3,546.39 11,701.27 324122 71212009 123898 QWEST 112.98 952 920 -8166 40.05 952 922 -9246 51.46 952 922 -2444 204.49 PO # Doc No 214652 214653 214654 214655 214884 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/29/2009 -712/2009 Inv No Account No 164395 -00 5842.5513 167893 -00 5842.5513 163533 -00 5822.5512 169780 -00 5842.5512 172841 -00 •5862.5512 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 214946 8166 -6/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 214947 9246 -6/09 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 214948 24446/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 324123 712/2009 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 333.00 WATER BILLS MAILED 214823 2379 5910.6103 333.00 324124 712/2009 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 92.50 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 5861.6180 92.50 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 5431.6180 92.50 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 1301.6180 185.00 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 5915.6180 370.00 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 5620.6103 423.00 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 1646.6103 436.75 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 1552.6406 532.00 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 1628.6103 576.50 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 1551.6180 602.00 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 5210.6180 1,200.50 TEST & REPAIR RPZ UNITS 00005213 214835 11141 5630.6230 4,603.25 324126 7/212009 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 148.04 FILTER CLEANER 214824 180694 5620.6406 148.04 324126 71212009 123767 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 993.75 BROCHURE DESIGN 214787 609151 -5 2210.6103 993.75 324127 71212009 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 200.00 FAMILY FESTIVAL 7 /11/09 214538 062209 5631.6136 200.00 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT VERNON OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS CITY HALL GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINI'- -'TION R55CKREG LOG20000 I CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 25 6/29/2009 — 712/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 324128 71212009 101311 ROOT- O -MATIC SEWER SERVICE 550.00 EMERGENCY JETTING 00001186 214700 30046 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 550.00 324129 7/212009 124428 RUDOLPH, CHRISCELL 100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214738 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 324130 71212009 100988 SAFETY -KLEEN 99.22 USED OIL FILTERS DISPOSAL 00001317 214504 0039135499 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.22 324131 71212009 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 61.30 BAKERY 214701 252471 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 61.30 324132 71212009 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 35.96 101= ••"••9350 214788 062509 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 35.96 324133 7/212009 103869 SANDBERG, MARY 120.00 MODEL 214739 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.00 324134 7/212009 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 1,438.05 STEERING VALVE REPAIRS 214505 6665 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,438.05 324135 71212009 124440 SCH01-7, ELLIE 30.00 CLASS REFUND 214937 060209 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 30.00 324136 71212009 122471 SEED SOLUTIONS 2,121.48 SEED /FERTILIZER 00001169 214506 5951446 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 2,121.48 324137 71212009 100997 SESAC INC. 168.50 MUSIC LICENSE 00008008 214507 3012537 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 168.50 324138 7/2/2009 103249 SHANNON, JIM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6130/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 26 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 140.00 PERFORMANCE 717/09 214545 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 324139 71212009 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 1,184.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214799 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,960.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 214799 062509 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 4,144.00 324140 712/2009 101000 SIR SPEEDY 1,188.52 UTILITY BILL STUFFERS 00001297 214508 60765 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 58.45 BUSINESS CARDS 214702 60774 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,246.97 324141 71212009 110977 SOW, ADAMA 134.55 ART WORK SOLD 214740 062509 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 890.00 CLEANING 214740 062509 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 979.80 INSTRUCTOR AC 214740 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,004.35 324142 712/2009 104672 SPRINT 23.46 214509 873184124 -079 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 23.80 214509 873184124 -079 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 50.86 214509 873184124 -079 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 50.86 214509 673184124 -079 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 50.97 214509 873184124 -079 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 52.39 214509 873184124 -079 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 77.38 214509 873184124 -079 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 84.66 214509 873184124 -079 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.34 214509 873184124 -079 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 125.90 214509 873184124 - 079 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 151.51 214509 873184124 -079 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 159.46 214509 873184124 -079 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 160.50 214509 873184124 -079 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 220.32 214509 873184124 -079 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 259.47 214509 873184124 -079 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 414.30 214509 873184124 -079 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 532.20 214509 873184124 -079 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 690.00 214509 873184124 -079 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 732.00 214509 873184124 -079 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,454.02 214509 873184124 -079 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.99 00001384 214510 666109817 -019 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 39.99 00001384 214510 666109817 -019 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING C _NTAL R55CKREG LOG20000 150.00 CITY OF EDINA 324149 71212009 Council Check Register 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 6/29/2009 - 712/2009 35.75 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 28.60 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 214517 5,496.38 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 324143 7/212009 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 324150 71212009 219.85 ALTERNATOR 00001215 214511 S172331 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 219.85 79.88 LIQUID FERTILIZER 214515 1551 -RGR 324144 7/212009 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 79.88 30.77 CORES KEYED 00001165 214512 CH- 510257 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 57.31 KEYS 214583 CH- 510256 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.86 BATTERY DOOR BATTERIES 00001410 214789 88.08 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 324145 71212009 124430 STERNITZKE, RAQUEL 324152 7/212009 36.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214741 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36.00 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 214555 070209 324146 71212009 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 613012009 15:37:56 Page - 27 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5.62 COPIER MAINTENANCE 214513 6876265 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.62 324147 71212009 101765 STROH, STEVE 154.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 214514 062309 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 154.95 324148 712/2009 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7409 214548 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION RESERVE PROGRAM 150.00 324149 71212009 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 35.75 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 214516 1187795 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 28.60 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 214517 1187794 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 64.35 324150 71212009 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 79.88 LIQUID FERTILIZER 214515 1551 -RGR 5422.6540 FERTILIZER 79.88 324151 71212009 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 8.86 BATTERY DOOR BATTERIES 00001410 214789 24957 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 8.86 324152 7/212009 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 214555 070209 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION RESERVE PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/29/2009 - 712/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES CONCRETE CONCRETE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page - 28 Business Unit GRILL GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER GOLF ADMINISTRATION PATHS 8 HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 100.00 YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 324153 7/2/2009 101027 TARGET 37.61 X- XXX -XX9 -840 00006297 214790 061809 5421.6406 37.61 324164 7/2/2009 120326 TCC MATERIALS 291.03 MORTAR 00001374 214825 0000439911 5932.6520 24.00- CREDIT 214826 0000440143 5932.6520 267.03 324155 7/2/2009 124437 TEITSCHEID, ANDREW 150.00 TALENT FEE 6/24 214938 062609 5410.6103 150.00 324156 712/2009 113549 TENNIS WEST 1,370.00 FENCE REPAIR 00001190 214703 09 -07779 1647.6180 1,370.00 324167 71212009 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 89.83 CONNECTORS 00001197 214518 77966 -00 1553.6530 129.76 FUSES, CIRCUIT BREAKERS 00001199 214519 78050 -00 1553.6530 219.59 324158 7/212009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 459.00 214791 72273 5421.5514 459.00 324159 71212009 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 366.00 TEEN FIELD TRIP 214792 4871486 1624.6406 366.00 324160 7/2/2009 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 214704 2009 -27393 5822.6122 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 214704 2009 -27393 5842.6122 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 214704 2009 -27393 5862.6122 1,500.00 324161 7/2/2009 115601 TILE SHOP, THE 952.06 TILE 00002235 214827 3919726 5620.6406 21.37 KNEE PADS 214828 3920157 5620.6406 973.43 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONCRETE CONCRETE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Page - 28 Business Unit GRILL GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER GOLF ADMINISTRATION PATHS 8 HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 29 6/29/2009 - 7/2/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 324162 71212009 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 1,492.43 ENGINEERING SERVICES 214939 000200901714 10091.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge 1,334.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES 214940 000200901715 05481.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -481 M'SIDE H20MAIN PIPELINE 2,827.03 324163 71212009 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 5,724.37 FURNISHIINSTALL CHAIN LINK 00005788 214705 22242 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 5,724.37 324164 7/212009 101042 TRIARCO 83.79 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00007110 214793 91008 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 83.79 324165 7/212009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 564.56 SPINDLE, SHIMS 00001375 214520 J117159 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.75 CARTRIDGES 00001180 214584 J117342 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.97 SWITCH 00001211 214585 J117393 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.15 SHIMS 00001398 214586 J117159A 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,547.31 AXLE, CYLINDER, TIE ROD 00001403 214794 J117373 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.24 FILTERS 00001411 214829 T120246 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,370.98 324166 71212009 105243 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 1,283.70 YORK REMODELING 214706 207176A -5 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 1,283.70 324167 7/212009 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 82.54 GRASS SEED 00001173 214521 21244 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 82.54 324168 71212009 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 12.23 SHIPPING CHARGES 00001371 214522 TRAN5921 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT 7.96 SHIPPING CHARGES 00001394 214523 TRAN6122 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 163.96 SHIPPING CHARGES 00001405 214795 TRAN:6216 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 184.15 324169 71212009 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 217.63 METERING TUBE 00001109 214524 831207 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 1,227.11 SPRINGS, REPAIR KITS 00001244 214525 833270 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 186.80 NOZZLE 00005567 214526 801962 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 874.38 FITTINGS 00001095 214527 835162 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/3012009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 30 6/29/2009 - 712/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 128.85 MARKER FLAGS 00001109 214528 836082 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,634.77 324170 71212009 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 298.60 ROAD WORK SIGN SERVICES 00001295 214529 14527 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 298.60 324171 712/2009 124445 VALUE ADDED SERVICES INC. 758.28 POSTER FRAMES 214941 00011155 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 758.28 324172 71212009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 307.82 TABLE COVERS 214796 124408 -01 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 307.82 324173 7/212009 124436 VERHOTA, MOLLY 70.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 214942 061709 5601.4557 BIRTHDAY RENTAL EB /CL REVENUES 70.00 324174 7/212009 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 104.54 STARTER BRUSHES 214533 42527 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 104.54 324175 712/2009 101064 VESSCO INC. 82.68 FLEXIBLE TUBING 214530 45649 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 82.68 324176 7/212009 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 133.42 SPLICE KIT 00001385 214830 3756895 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 133.42 324177 71212009 119454 VINOCOPIA 115.50 214885 0016465 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 146.50 214885 0016465 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 262.00 324178 7/212009 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 309.50 CONCESSION PRODUCT 214531 25792578 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 59.30 TRASH LINERS 214532 42527 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 664.97 CONCESSION PRODUCT 214532 42527 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 374.20 PIZZA 214707 25800804 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 186.80 LINERS, TISSUE, SOAP 214708 25815442 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 31 6/29/2009 -712/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,081.03 CONCESSION PRODUCT 214708 25815442 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 318.99 CONCESSION PRODUCT 214831 25833513 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,996.79 324179 71212009 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 FAMILY FESTIVAL 7/11/09 214539 062209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 324180 7/2/2009 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 214554 070209 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 324181 71212009 119617 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 105.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 00001299 214587 2000454130 5923.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 105.00 324182 7/2/2009 123431 WATER WIZARD IRRIGATION 228.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR 214943 010666 01345.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -345 WOODLAND CIR 228.50 324183 71212009 124236 WEINHOLD, CRYSTAL 72.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214742 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 72.00 324184 7/2/2009 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 576.65 JULY 2009 MAINTENANCE 214558 070109 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 576.65 324185 71212009 102342 WENZEL, KENNETH 280.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214743 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 280.00 324186 71212009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 217.20 214656 220625 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,765.70 214886 220624 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 160.00- 214887 220196 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE / 50TH ST SELLING 1,822.90 324187 71212009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,692.48 214657 278094 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.68 214658 278092 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 276.61 214659 278091 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 32 6/29/2009 - 71212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,522.70 214888 278996 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.12 214889 278994 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,051.52 214890 278995 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 289.11 214891 278992 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,947.22 324188 71212009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 5,373.96 214660 247636 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 112.54 214661 247634 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 118.65 214662 247403 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 652.75 214663 247633 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 134.45 214664 247632 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,520.62 214665 247627 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,119.20 214666 245797 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,941.68 214667 247623 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.10 214668 247624 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,344.25 214669 247625 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 103.45 214670 247630 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,826.85 214892 247635 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,422.21 214893 247631 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,389.85 214894 247629 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 326.80 214895 247628 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 25,444.36 324189 712/2009 118395 WITMER ASSOCIATES INC. 236.99 FACE SHIELD 00003748 214797 E592398 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 236.99 324190 7/2/2009 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 281.07 FLOATER GOLF BALLS 00002060 214832 223099 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 281.07 324191 7/212009 121699 WM LAMPTRACKER INC. 483.17 LAMP RECYCLING 214588 600946 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 56TH STREET RUBBISH 483.17 324192 71212009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 483.90 214896 231002 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,401.06 214897 230932 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,884.96 324193 7/: 120223 WORTHINGTON, HEATHER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2009 15:37:56 Council Check Register Page - 33 6/29/2009 —7/212009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 234.98 NEXTEL PHONE ACCESSOIRES 214709 062409 1460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 400.00 ICMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 214709 062409 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 634.98 324194 712/2009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 40.86 51- 5276505 -8 214534 199873408 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 40.86 324196 71212009 103684 XPEDX 2,330.89 WATER REPORT PAPER 214798 N346862511 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,330.89 324196 712/2009 124443 YELKIN, BRUCE 229.09 VEHICLE DAMAGE REPAIRS 214944 062509 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 229.09 324197 7/212009 122316 ZACK'S INC. 114.96 RUBBER BOOTS 00001243 214535 25066 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 114.96 324198 712/2009 101069 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 392.41 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00002059 214833 54165046 5631.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 392.41 324199 7/212009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 565.50 NYLON BLADES, COCO MATS 00001205 214589 PCO01148787 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 565.50 324200 712/2009 101631 ZINN, BOBO 147.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 214744 062509 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 716.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 214744 062509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 863.00 570,628.02 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 570,628.02 Total Payments 570,628.02 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/2912009 - 7/2/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 99,824.17 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,119.65 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 144,677.06 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,492.43 05100 ART CENTER FUND 18,705.71 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 602.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 9,571.44 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 46,794.66 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 6,467.13 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 13,877.95 05800 LIQUOR FUND 142,667.84 05900 UTILITY FUND 78,549.27 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 6,254.91 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 23.80 Report Totals 570,628.02 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing policl nd procedures e o 6/30/2009 15:39:11 Page - 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYM' 'REGISTER 5/26/09 - 6/25/09 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/28 $2,287.00 POOL LICENSE JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, KINGWOOD TX 5310.6103 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/05/31 $330.58 TENNIS PROGRAM PANERA BREAD #1315 EDINA MN 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/03 $90.81 BOX FANS TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/05 $260.35 DIAPERS TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5621.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/05 $16.99 MOVIE RENTAL MUI *MOVIES UNLIMITED 800 - 668 -4344 PA 5631.6130 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/05 $36.48 MOVIE RENTAL MUI *MOVIES UNLIMITED 800 - 668 -4344 PA 5631.6130 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/07 $342.00 TENNIS PROGRAM UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/08 $175.75 RENEW LICENSE JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, KINGWOOD TX 5310.6103 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/09 $247.00 TENNIS PROGRAM ONCOURT OFFCOURT, LTD DALLAS TX 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/10 $175.14 SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/10 $171.01 CENTENNIAL LAKES SUPPLIES DICK'S CLOTHING &SPORTIP RICHFIELD MN 5630.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/13 $27.52 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES RENTAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/16 $202.04 SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN PI EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/18 $116.00 TENNIS PROGRAM ACTIVE *USTA TEAMTNS 877 - 243 -8107 CA 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/18 $159.50 TENNIS PROGRAM ACTIVE *USTA TEAMTNS 877 - 243 -8107 CA 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/19 $168.79 HANES SOCKS VISR WWW.VISR.NE' NC 5620.5510 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/19 $98.08 PARK PROGRAM SUPPLIES TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1621.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/19 $64.91 SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800 - 2280475 NE 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/06/19 $13.98 CASH REGISTER PAPER ROYAL CONSUMER INFO PF 800 - 243 -4002 NJ 5631.6513 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/25 $768.96 CONFERENCE HILTON HOTELS PALMR HS CHICAGO IL 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/28 $12.00 CONFERENCE U OF M PARKING AND TRAIL MINNEAPOLIS MN - 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/05/29 $9.00 CONFERENCE U OF M PARKING AND TRAM MINNEAPOLIS MN 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/06/23 $12.04 COUNCIL WORKSHOP JERRY'S FOODS EDINA MN 1100.6106 MIKE SIITARI 2009/05/28 $29.20 RIFLE CHANGE OVER LAW ENFORCEMENT TARG1800- 7790182 MN 1400.6551 MIKE SIITARI 2009/06/01 $169.50 BATTERIES B & H PHOTO-VIDEO-MO/TO 212-2397500 NY 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2009/06/10 $32.05 INK.CARTRIDGES BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1400.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2009/06/04 $38.00 CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN '1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2009/06/10 $314.28 BUILDING CODE MANUALS MINNESOTA BOOKSTORE 651- 2968233 MN 1495.6405 JOHN WALLIN 2009/06/16 $368.81 BUILDING CODE MANUALS MINNESOTAS BOOKSTORE 651- 2978772 MN 1495.6405 JOHN WALLIN 2009/06/16 $102.63 COUNCIL WORKSHOP KOWALSKI'S MARKET EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1100.6106 $6,840.40 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll les and procedure to SO REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VII. A. From: Debra Mangen Consent City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Receive petition Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Info /Background: The City received a petition signed by six resident on Jeff Place requesting the installation of drain tile. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. City of Edina, Min nesota DA In y� }CITY COUNCIL S y 4801 West SUIT' Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (61.2) 927 -5461 TDI) AEC � 20Q9 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDi ±:WA.LK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STOR.M SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WI:I'H. CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor anal City Council: ❑ STREET LIGHTING [X 0,11-TER: 5J At P a. • .•j::-r/�u The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider th.e. improvements listed above to the locations listed below. bet 1,0(.`.AT1ON OF M- 111ROVEMENT 11Y S"rRI ?,E.T NAME, _ _bet LOCATION Of IMPRONEAIEN'r BY S KIWI' NAME I. "OC:A'r1ON OF IMPROVEMENT 11Y STREET NAME ADDRPISS ADDRESS ADDRESS • ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS between_ and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREF r NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS- . IMPORTANT NOT k THE PERSONS WHO HAVE NI U TIiIS PL +'TITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COU ':i.I,,,, M.AY ASSES_ S-TH-i; "`COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITIN( ERGS "�'I'HE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETE.RMINED BY THE COUNCIL, AS AU 1'T•11MZED BY CI-IA T-iR 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS -' SIGNTVRE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) AA Am It U s' f__ AM I k-Ae e_. 6 0 0 4 :,g 1 fis petiti 1 ivs circulated by: — - .......... - ._ -.... - - -- - - -- _._...— NAME. ADDRESS -- - - -- - -- — - - -- PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 S' OWNER'S N&j'%,ID PKOPB0IYADDRE.38 ISIGIf (PRINTED) (y}llNTOD) Thiy petition was circulated by: MANB ADDRESS PHONE ?hrAhmm"m Dam /)xukrxAr/ requires /hat `,ciqlbn you q/)vmr,�ghu about the piiuoo Cut prmr'cyusbigoxthis,pn/. Under the law, your telephone omoherby,hv/rohm.771byctiik"/ when o'bxixn/wi8 become public hy\vw^fiv/.Ihr/risop 'Yuo may Much extra pagcs With xi utUrno. APRT 2M8 o e gig 0 To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: July 7, 2009 Subject: Letter Received Westerdahl & Lubar REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VII. B. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: William Westerdahl and Robert Lubar brought in the attached letter regarding the proposed bike segments and the environmental assessment worksheet. WEAL To: Members, Edina City Council J1029 2mq� Cc: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, Three Rivers Park District e.,� It is our understanding that the staffs of the City of Edina, Three Rivers Park DistrictMf16) and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) have recommended Bonestroo, Inc. to complete an EAW for the portion of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail passing through Edina. We also understand that the TRPD is seeking a resolution by the Edina City Council in support of Bonestroo Inc. as the firm of record charged with completing the EAW. We, the undersigned, have property located within or adjacent to the outlined Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed. Our properties are either adjacent or in close proximity to alternate route 2 of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Trail We request that route 2 be immediately removed from further consideration for the following reasons: 1) Alternate route #2 passes through the FIRM for the Nine Mile Creek flood plain. We are concerned that creating the bike trail and re- routing the creek will create a greater risk of flooding causing significant property damages. Property owners along alternate route #2 are currently either required or encouraged to have flood insurance governed by FEMA regulations. The two points identified below seem inconsistent with the objectives of this project. a) Edina city code 850.21 subd 5 para.DI appears not to allow any construction or fill which would increase the 100 year flood level. b) FEMA regulations require that modifications within flood plains (with established elevations) cannot result in a change to the water level by more than .01 feet. 2) Alternate route #2 passes through a wetland. The NMCWD requires that any wetland lost through modifications to the wetland be replaced on a 2 to 1 basis. 3) The potential loss of wildlife within one of the few remaining "natural" areas in Edina is not an acceptable alternative. 4) The loss of privacy and potential security threats to our property are a concern that have not been adequately addressed. We support increased biking and walking trails within Edina. We recommend adoption of alternative route #3 with minor modifications making it safer for all trail users. This is the route recommended by the "City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan of September 19, 2007 ". In addition, route #3 would provide lighted year round bicycle access to employers in the area (United Health Care and the Opus complex) by local residents and others. The costs of investigating and implementing alternative route 2 outweigh any potential benefits to the community. If alternative route 2 continues to be evaluated, we anticipate that an EAW (and /or other analyses) would require extensive analysis to forecast flood levels and damage estimates to the trail and adjacent property under a variety of scenarios. Also, based on our concerns about local wildlife, privacy and security, spending taxpayer money to produce an EAW (and perhaps subsequent EIS) covering alternative segment #2 seems unwise and wasteful. Given the current revenue shortfalls and budget constraints, we propose that the city immediately drop consideration of altemative route # 2 in order to save taxpayer dollars, protect wetlands and reduce potential property damages and associated liability to authorizing agencies. This proposed action continues to support enhanced bicycle transportation and recreation routes. Respectfully submitted, See attached documents SEA! Letter to: Edina City Council, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and Three Rivers Park District 1 JI)t 2 9 2009 Signature Printed Name Date 4MA0,4 � IfJ7V[ G L - l3A - �-V -1 /*".1 c Ca on n "i e- C 5 llfe:,pz ben - �V j � 4ro& CIAICoL gusscu Address 40c, F ssk 6 (at r jCV4 -L tI(90y 99n, Q1'" Z`t S;rY3C. 6(oy v:Lmdrmderr n Ss4�36 � 2 srf Of 623 Londunderrc, Imo/ �„�,� 55 t3.� r Ado iossaLC G Ze d �fi �f2. 1� r/o / �6 �6 !, /JLGLLI/��/ /!/e �✓ YJ6 i� o� gEA1. �c7 29 � pE rod WaIN+ D() V , ._f A r� cis -►-( j�(��% �� �a o V e-,C" Ad At; laAl cis -►-( j�(��% �� �a o V e-,C" Ad At; laAl of Le Info /Background: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII.C. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: July 2, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Received Since Last Council Meeting Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. RECEIVED JUL 01 2 2009 To the Edina City Council — John and I have been fitness members at Interlachen for 8 years. We have often walked from our home to the club through the current maintenance area. We use the club facilities frequently and value our time there. We bought our home at 413 Kresse Circle in March 2001. Because of heavy snow cover, we were unaware of the sad condition of the Interlachen property behind our house. The snow covered the piles of dead wood. Interlachen does not maintain the area. Mowing is infrequent and the great old oak trees haven't been trimmed of dead wood. Our driveway, which edges the Interlachen property, is. so overgrown that our cars get scratched. None of the buckthorn has been removed. It has grown so densely along the south pond that Nathan and Melissa Franzen cannot see the pond from their deck. We have pulled hundreds of buckthorn seedlings from our yard. The new building will be closest to our home. We are uncomfortable with the 2 doors at the back of the building — facing our home. We do not want the many seasonal employees to use that area as a hang out. Nathan and Melissa Franzen and John and I want a 174 foot long by 6 foot high cedar fence as close as possible to the back of the building, We don't care about the infiltration basin planted with perennial grasses because we won't be able to see it or the American larch trees which are not evergreen. We do not want the elms. John and I and the Franzens met with Craig Christensen from Interlachen and the landscape architect, Eric Dolt. We asked for a cedar fence, varied evergreens with some being larger between the fence and the existing oaks, small areas of understory plantings around the existing oaks and 1 shade tolerant evergreen with hostas behind our house. We agreed that Interlachen could move a portion of our driveway away from the Franzen's deck and requested a row of lilacs or similar along the property line. We as or the north pond ked for a bubbling pond aerator f because 1 neighbor thought that a fountain type would take away from the natural look of the pond. Craig Christensen from Interlachen has agreed to trim the oaks, remove buckthorn and dead.trees, and maintain. the plantings. In other words, we asked them to °give us something nicer to look at. Because Interlachen has not been very forthcoming during this process, we are concerned that they will not follow through. We are asking that the city council members watch out for us "little guys" in this process. Please make sure that Interlachen does what it has agreed to do. Respectfully, John & Sally King 413 Kresse Circle RAY i 5� P��� � �rol�a +��CtiC� '�� tioOP-16 swotU�446 _77777 gor44-. 1P. It, ITS 41 it h. :-;:,-.-_ V-1 MANT64 BUILDING POND !A IJ GPage 1 of 1 Sally King From: Craig Christensen [craig1949 @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:42 PM To: Joan Wierzba; Nathan B. Franzen; John King ' Cc: George Carroll; Gerald Haugen; Matt Rostal; Peter Boosalis; Ward, Lyle G. Subject: Maintenance Facility Joan, Nathan and John: I am forwarding to you after this email the revised landscape plan and site plan. I'm going to address the issues that were raised and our response its this email. 1) The building has been moved 10' feet to the east. We did this by eliminating the parking stalls in front of the building. This is as far east as we can. go and still maintain truck access to the west side of the existing structure (which will remain) where we will have soil storage. There was a question raised about truck movement in the site and whether the truck radius could be decreased if the driveway into the site was 150' or less. Because of the reason stated above, this issue is. moot! We ate also advised by the -City Engineer that he wants the turning area as shown even if fire officials require less: 2) Landscaping has been revised as shAm on the plan. Let us know your thoughts. 3) The roof has been lowered 16" by reducing the pitch, That's as much as we could do without getting into snow load issues. The suggestion about a hip style roof doesa't work. It would only provide a partial elevation -- reduction at the south end where the roof height is already lower than the rest of the building. Another suggestion was to lower the entire building. We are as low as we can go already for drainage purposes. 4) We are prepared to grant a driveway easement to the King property over club property so that the existing gravel driveway can be moved away frpm the Framer's OP4. This WQUld be about 10 -15 feet fro m the existing road' (as we discussed on site) and would be done by the: pleb when we do the project in the same gravel type road that presently exists. The Board of ICC approved this last night. This is subject to the approval of the owner of the current easement (the Kings presumably). 5) Roof color has been changed to brown. 6) We will do buckthorn removal as discussed. We will need an agreement from affected neighbors about some of that, as the buckthorn does screen the project in places. 7) We will mechanically aerate the two adjacent ponds with fountain pumps similar to what is being used at other ponds at the club now., When we met, we discussed getting back together on site to discuss this again. Let me know if you want to do that. I welcome your thoughts and comments. I'm not sure there is anything we can do with the site plan or building. It's a little easier to make changes on the landscape plan. We are planning to make the changes shown here to our plans and get them into the City to be part of the City Council review on July 7. Craig Craig Christensen craig1949 @gmail.com 7/1/7009 Page 4 of 5 From: Craig Christensen [mailto:craigl949 @gmai1 com1 Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:45 PM To: Joan Wierzba; Nathan B. Franzen; John King Cc: Peter Boosalis; Matt Rostal Subject: Fwd: Interlachen - Revised Planting Here is the revised landscape plan with the landscape architect's notes. --- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Eric B. Holt <BHolt@,barr.com> Date: Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:42 PM Subject: Interlachen - Revised Planting To: trum nb�gth- arch.com, Craig Christensen <crai A 49@@,_gmail.com >, peterboo2@�oo.com Cc: Mark Kretschmer Fred Rozumalski <FRozumalski(cr�barr.com> All, Attached are pdf s of the revised planting plan and typical sections illustrating the screening strategy for the west side of the building. This strategy incorporates the following: - Protection of existing mature plantings where possible. - Possible earthen berm (dependent on future site grading work) - Swale or infiltration basin planted with perennial grasses. - Expanded understory shrub and perennial plantings. - Several layers of planting screens, incorporating more species diversity and variety in plant sizelform. - Gradient of screening: i.e. plantings become more dense nearer to the building. <<Ll.pdf>> <<SCREENING SECTIONS.pdf>> Please review and let me know of any questions. I can make changes /clarifications to the plans tomorrow if needed. We will be working on the revised site grading and stormwater management plans this week and next, and will try to accommodate these screening strategies in those plans. Eric Bartholomew Holt Associate ASLA Barr Engineering 952.832.2842 ehol ,barr.com 17i1 i ')nno CY, 6) En ol, Awl C-1 , ®r tl V CF AIN W K FE T07.1 G BUILDING CORNS R OND IffigE P RI cr, N ftASTI,.EDGjIlG, "N' co jv 7 v. i5 ILL, HAIN LINK FrENCING FROM EUILDIN-. CORNER TO POND EbGE',-" GING, TYPICAL F -Fj U NN X, L PLASTIC a 4- III ire n J TREE LEGEND; 4`5 Swamp White Oak I Quercus bicolor 41k-- � Triumph Elm Ulmus 'Morton Glossy' American Larch Larix laildina Norway Spruce Picea abies Existing tree to be saved. See Sheet C5, Free Preservation Plan GROUNDCOVER LEGEND: ElFine Fesuce Grass Mix Wet Meadow Mix 5' Gravel Maintenance Strip Picea Heavy Metal Switch Grass t!! Panicurn virgatUM 'Heavy Metal' Triumph SIM Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 10 Diervilla lonicera Off Ivory Halo Dogwood W com, us alba 'Bailhalo' PLANT LEGEND: Common Name Latin Name Quantl Size ISpadng r(eas Norway SM08 Picea gul t!! Plan Triumph SIM Lamus Urton Goss 10 1.5' BOB Per Plan American Larch le! 1:5° 08i BI Per Plan Swam White Oak. Quemus bicolor-.- 1.57 t3auj Per Plan Shrubs and --anoundeavers I Dwarf Bush Hone suckle Dierw'lla lonicera 285 # 2 QW. He" Metal Switc I PA�46um d arum He Metal, 110N = # i Cont. hory Halo 1300wood Comus afba Safthalo' 33 12 Cont. 5' .C. - BARRI ;-I Pmj.d Otfi- R.A0 eaxammc Co. 4700 WM 77M STREEr MMU'afi. MN, 55435-4=3 Fft 1--M-432-2277 F— (052) 632-2801 .b— 6— Z FA z ca 0 CL 0 ME d z F H < TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS A ASSOC,,INC,, ""= arm 01M 55315 (ffi"-= FAX(94M-7918 DATE = 1411 ftrn%r= PROPERTY LINE INRLTRATION EMIR - SECTION: WEST SIDE SCREENING STRATEGY MATURE PLANTINGS °, 10 ?D O SCALE IN FEET - - DRIVT3 ALONG BERM PROPERTY LINE It4T7LTftAT1ON 9A$IN SECTION: WEST SIDE SCREENING STRATEGY INSTALLATION PLANTINGS ° ',, ?D O SCALE IN FEET MAINTENANCE FACILITY Page t of 2 p Sally King From: Sally King Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 9:17 PM To: 'Craig-Christensen'; Joan Wierzba;_ Nathan B. Franzen;. John King- Cc: Peter Boosalis; Matt Rostal;'EHolt @barr.com" Subject; RE, Interlachen = Revised- Planting Hello All — I have some problems with the landscape plans. 1) The section illustrated would only be visible to Nathan Franzen if he were standing on the temporarily existing blacktop drive with his back to the pond (buckthorn wall). This is not an illustration of what would see. 2) The swale or infiltration basin planted with lower growing grasses, dogwood and honeysuckle would not be visible because of the mature oak and other existing trees and the planned Norway spruce trees. Where are the "expanded understory shrub and perennial plantings" we can see? 3) 1 can not find one credible source that recommends the Triumph elm tree. I read that it exhibits "wild growth" and "splaying branches ". It had greater susceptibility to the elm leaf beetle and the Japanese beetle. The stem has proven weak necessitating continued staking. Michael Dirr (often quoted tree expert) called it and the other Morton elm varieties "ugly ". It requires full or part sun. It won't work behind my house and I don't want it. 4) The plan shows 6 Norway spruce trees behind my house. An article in the American Nurseryman magazine from February 15, 2008 states that most conifers want to live in full sun. It says that Norway spruce require at least 4 to 5 hours of direct sun to thrive and grow properly. The article states that only a few conifer species will tolerate and thrive in partial shade. They are arborvitae, yew and hemlock. Not one of these in the plan. All I can say is — good luck! 5) The same criticism goes for the American larch. The previously mentioned article calls this tree "shade intolerant ". It needs full sun. Again — good luck 6) No groundcovers planned along the driveway or in front of the existing mature trees. Even a few hostas or grasses would have been appreciated. Nathan Franzen suggested a row of lilacs along the driveway. 7) 1 checked the Missouri Botanical Garden website (mobot.org) for recommended trees (Plants of Merit) that can tolerate part shade conditions. Three maples — paperbark, three- flowered and shantung are noteworthy and listed as zone 4. A river birch — betula nigra "Cully" Heritage is the best of the river birches. American hombeam is an understory tree that performs well in part to full shade. They also list the katsura tree and the black gum tree. The University of MN extension service website lists 4 outstanding smaller maples: purple blow, mountain, three flowered and striped. Not any of them in the plan. 8) The landscape architect states that the plan incorporates "more species diversity and variety in plant sizefform ". How do the 7 triumph elms (mature height: 60 ft.) and the 14 Norway spruce (mature height: 80 -100 ft.) that will be primarily visible to me and my neighbors speak to species diversity and variety in plant sizefform? 9) There are other trees, seedlings and buckthorn that are not listed as trees to be saved. There are dead trees. Will you clean these out? Next winter, will you trim the dead wood out of the old oak trees that have been neglected for years? Will you mow the grass around the oaks? 10) What happened to the 6 foot tall cedar privacy fence I was told I would get? Could we meet with the landscape architect on Monday to discuss? Sincerely, Sally King From: Craig Christensen [mai1to:craig19490gmall.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:45 PM To: Joan Wierzba; Nathan B. Franzen; John King P9 /9 /11 Afro �o Pagel of 5 Sally King From: Craig Christensen [craig1949 @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:44 AM To: Nathan B. Franzen Cc: Sally King; Joan Wierzba; John King; Peter Boosalis; Matt Rostal; EHolt @barr.com Subject: Re: Interlachen - Revised Planting All -- Eric isn't available tonight. Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday work. Let me know what day you want. Craig On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Nathan B. Franzen < NFranzen (d1westwoodrenewables.com> wrote: Craig, We are able to meet on Monday evening as well. It would he ideal if your landscape architect could attend so that we can sketch a few ideas instead of going back and forth via email. I think we would all like to finalize things. I agree with Sally on the plant selections. The larches will lose their leavestneedles in the winter so they will not provide much screening. In general, the number and size of plantings should be increased. A 1.5" tree will take a long time before it provides much benefit. Below is one possible solution to all of our concerns. I put them in order of location from east to west. Shed Cedar Fence (through the middle of die- cur rent understory plantings) Evergreens (varied species and a few larger 12 -15') Existing trees Understory plantings (small areas mixed throughout existing trees) King's driveway Lilac or similar at property line. Please let us know if you are able to meet. iii i�nn4 l Page 2 of 5 Regards, Nathan & Mehsa From: Craig Christensen [mailto:cra�1949 ail.com] Sent: Sunday, Junib 21, 2009 5:07 AM To: Sally King Cc: Joan Wierzba; Nathan B. Franzen; John King; Peter Boosalis; Matt Rostal; EHolt@barr.com Subject: Re: Interlachen - Revised Planting Sally — thabks for your comments. You've put in a lot of tune reviewing this plan. We are certainly flexible on plant selections, but the plan has to reflect everyone's concerns. Are you speaking on behalf of your neighbors so that if we meet with you on this we can make the changes that everyone wants? If not, I would request that the interested neighbors get together and discuss this before we meet so that the next plan reflects everyone's concerns. With regard to the fence, our impression from the meeting at the site was that the wood fence was not what everyone wanted. The fencing that we are now proposing facilitates the change in your driveway easement. A wood privacy fence would also remove the need for the understory bushes and plantings that you have 6 mmented on, because they would no longer be visible to the neighborhood: .Is that the result that everyone wants? We need to settle on one fencing solution. I agree that there is some tree trimming that needs to be done and that will be followed up on. Finally, to the extent there are areas in the plan that need to be maintained, we will do so. Let me know your thoughts on all of this. Craig On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Sally King <sallyk@kingsales.com> wrote: Hello All — PI/1 iIInnn Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED JUL 0 12N9 Mike Siitari "&-m From: Machell Bentley Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:38 PM To: Mark Biermaier Cc: Mike Siitari; Brian Tholen Subject: Compliment Mark, I just received a phone from Mr. Tom Pattergon who lives at 4440 Parklawn. You (Mark) responded to a 911 call at his neighbors unit today, 6/17/09, at approximately 10:22 hours (Event #200926452). He wanted to say how impressed he was with how you handled the; situation. He said you were so kind and patient with the woman and how effective you were in figuring out what was happening and what needed to be done. He said you were just wonderful. He took the spelling of your name. I thanked him for the call and told him I would pass the information along. 6001 to inr 03//13332 July 2, 2009 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Mayor James Hovland, Council Member Joni Bennett, Council Member Mary Brindle, Council Member Scot Housh, Council Member Ann Swenson Dear City Council Members, We are submitting this written testimony on behalf of the Three Circles Neighborhood to clarify our position on the proposed maintenance facility at Interlachen Country Club ( "ICC "). Despite the fact that residents of Three Circles have met with representatives from ICC to address landscaping and buffer options, the neighborhood still finds itself divided with regards to the proposed maintenance facility and does not support the project due to the unreasonable size of the maintenance building and its close proximity to a residential area. We recognize positive adjustments to the landscape plan have been proposed, however, we have not received a written commitment from ICC nor any plans to date that formalize the outcome of our recent meetings. Therefore, it would be premature for the neighborhood to acquiesce to the proposed plans. In addition, the neighborhood has been forced to negotiate with ICC in a vacuum since the current code does not legally allow for the proposed building to be constructed in the first place. Furthermore, we contend that proper notice has not been complied with and the Planning Commission wrongfully considered the plans for a maintenance facility regardless of the fact that the proposed building did not comply with applicable zoning laws. We address these arguments in further detail below: Negotiations with ICC Our current negotiations with ICC have not been in bad faith as we are trying to minimize the impact to our neighborhood should the City choose to disregard the law and approve the plans submitted by ICC. We concede that positive adjustments to the landscape plan have been proposed, but again We have not seen a current plan incorporating our discussions and a written commitment from ICC that the buffer from the oversized building will be enhanced to the neighborhood's standards. Public Notice The neighborhood contends that due process has been jeopardized. The fact that the notices sent for the Planning Commission meeting were for a CUP and not a variance as required by code was improper. The Planning Commission got around that hurdle by arguing the building was associated with the parking lot and hence they had the authority to review the proposal as a whole. The neighborhood maintains that action was erroneous given the fact that the proposed building did not comply will all applicable zoning codes as required by law. If an Edina resident submitted a proposal that on its face did not comply with the code, the City would never recommend it to go to Planning Commission unless it was asking for the appropriate variance or CUP, if applicable. In this case, the proper action from the City would have been to require ICC to submit a CUP for the parking lot and a separate variance application for the oversized building. The City and the Planning Commission completely disregarded the established process and reviewed a plan that was not ripe for consideration until the proper notices had been given to impacted residents. The City is changing rules midway through the process and not following its own laws and ordinances. The current public notifications are misleading at best and we believe unlawful. It assumes the proposed text change has already been approved. The public deserves proper notification. Why are the residents the ones who are enforcing the City's own rules? The Zoning Board should be hearing this proposal and not the City Council. Opposition of the building location Let it be clear that the neighborhood is not arguing that the building not be constructed on ICC property. The neighborhood simply does not support the location of the oversized building so close to our residences. The fact that ICC has moved the building 10 feet away is not a reasonable accommodation to our concerns about noise and the potential nuisance that will be created. Furthermore, the City should find that ICC has other reasonable alternatives to locate the building. ICC has not provided acceptable reasons for deeming the proposed site the last and only available option. ICC relies on the fact that the proposed location is a "dump" and used to be a "chicken coup" approximately 50 years ago. That argument is irrelevant. There are numerous examples in the City of Edina where a less desired use has been enhanced and not the other way around. Case in point is Centennial Lakes, where 20 years ago the site used to be a sand /gravel pit and now is a park that has become subject of community pride. It is the City's duty to guard residents from unreasonable development that does not follow the intent of the comprehensive plan and that is legally unfounded. Conclusion ICC has operated for decades without this maintenance facility, they can wait a reasonable amount longer to allow for a thorough analysis of the impact such an ordinance change will have on neighborhoods and the City of Edina as a whole. A thorough review of the code should take place before taking action on this precedent setting proposal. Does Edina want metal sheds littered throughout the City? Why is the City not following the guidance of the comprehensive plan and addressing the "massing" of this building (170' long with metal siding). This is not acceptable. This is a precedent setting decision that will impact adjacent neighborhoods, schools, churches and golf courses into the future. The fact that the City has not enforced its own ordinance and that buildings have been erected in complete disregard to the law is unconscionable. Three Circles residents should not pay for such a substantial oversight on behalf of the City. The City should amend the ordinance to address the need of ICC and other similarly situated property owners, but through a more comprehensive approach. We respectfully request that the City Council vote to table this proposal until the City follows the appropriate notice laws and provides a comprehensive analysis of the pros and cons of changing the ordinance that takes into account the safeguards that need to be in place to avoid creating a nuisance in a residential area and provides a public value. Respectfully Submitted, Nathan & Melisa Franzen on behalf of the Three Circles Neighborhood 6216 Maloney Avenue Edina, MN 55343 Date RECEIVED Edina City Offices JUL OM 2009 4801 W. 50th St. Edina MN 55424 e -mail: edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE FOLLOWING: Edina Park & Recreation Department, John Keprios and Park Board members Three Rivers Park District, Kelly Grissman Senior Manager of Planning with Three Rivers Park District, Jonathan Vlaming City Council: Mayor James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson I oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek because: Habitat, environment — From Valley Lane to Creek View Lane, the woods and wetlands are home to many species of birds, frogs turtles and more. Blazing. a 16 -foot -wide trail would destroy habitats and add to pollution. Flooding — The creek often overflows into yards. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. Safety — If a path is built, we question the safety for adjacent homes and schools. Estimated number of trail users is 500,000 per year, which would bring marry visitors close to our schools, and thus add safety concerns for parents. Budget and priorities — This isn't the appropriate time for such a big - ticket project. The state budget deficit stands at more than $4.27 billion, much of that affecting schools. As budget cuts loom for Valley View Middle School and Edina High, a bike trail isn't a necessity. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. Sincerely, Name M 4- i Address Petition to preserve 9 Mile Creek RECEIVED JUN 191009 I am opposed to a - bike and walking trails along 9 Mile Creek in The City of Edina• l would I ike this area to remain in its current natural state. Phone Name * 1-4 e j e t Email "J 6 v a4 D Luc eCG s Add J X/ SY 3 City, Shoe Zip ❑Please keep me infonred via e-maa have you quad In Edina (yeareYi' � Less than 5 ❑ 5 � 10 ❑ 10 to 15 ❑ 15 to 20 [3 over 20 ❑ I do not live In Edina How long . I am opposed to the Bike Trails along 9 Mile creek because of the followirig Issues: (select all that apply) Safety and security ,,ss,,,[[��udget priorities �nhnal habitat reduction ftnvlronment concerns Ad- vacy Issues [moss of natural beauty A Ccemmenls: 1 K ti % r x! l� �e e/ //0 � �-�� d �- Cam- r7 Signature: Phone Name Email Address ❑ please keep me informed via e-mail City, state ZIP How long have You quad In Edlrra (teem)? 13 Lew than 5 ❑ 5 to 10 ' ❑ 10 to 15 ❑ 15 to 20 ❑over 20 ❑ i do not live in Edina I am opposed to the Bko TWO along 9 Mite creek because of the foaovving issues (select all that apply) ❑ Safety and security ❑ Budget priorities ❑ Animal habitat reduction ❑ Environment concerns E3 privacy Issues O Loss of natural beauty Comments. Signature: Phone Name Email Address p please keep me inforened via e-ma City, State Zip How to have you IN►sd In Edina (year�y? ❑ Lase than 5 � 5 M 10 010 to 15 O 15 m 20 ❑ over 20 ❑ I do net live in Edina 1 em opposed to the Bike Trails along 9 Mae creec ecau a Ot�riva Issues O Loses of all naiural beauty ❑ Safety and secuniY ❑ Budget Pft� l7 Animal habitat reduction [] Envinnment Comments: signature: will be shared with Officials from the Oty of Ed'ma. Th, PJvers Park except for email and phone numbers) organizations. This lnfarmatloh (* �p District and the 9 Mike Creek Watershed iistrict and other appropriate WWW.qMileCreek-oit"g RECEIVED Petition to Preserve 9Niie Creek JUN 2 9 2009 k As n opposed to adding bike and walking trails along 9 Mile Creek in The City of Edina. I would like this arena to. remain in its current natural state. Phone Name � e, Email ddaes D Please keep me irdomaed via e-mail City, State Zip How long have you lived in Edina (yeare)?,K Less than 5 D 5 to 10 D 10 to 15 O 15 to 20 Dover 20 ❑ I do not live in Edina am opposed to the Bike Trails along 9 Moe creek because of the following issues: (select all that apply) Budget priorities concerns D Animal habltSt reduction D Environrnerd conees O Privacy issues Loss of natural beauty D Safety and security Signature: Phone Narne Email Address D Please keep me Informed via email City, State Zip Dover 20 ❑ 1 do not live in Edina y �� have you lived in Edina (Yeare)7 D Less then 5 D 5 to 10 D i0 to 15 D 15 to 20 opposed to:the Br1ce Trolls along 9 MOD creek because of the foibwir>g Issues: (pled all that apply) ❑ Budget priorities 1 am O Animal habitat reduction D Environment concerns ❑Privacy issues O Loss of natural beauty ❑Safety and security Comments: Signature: Phone Name Emall Address D Please keep me irdonned via e-maJ City'"state Zip you lived in EdUra (year$)? D Less than 5 . O 5 ffi 10 O 10 m 15 D 15 to 20 ❑ over 20 ❑ l do not live in Edina How tort Y Mae creek because of the following Issues: (select all that apply) D Budget ties I a m opposed to the Bike Trails along . D Loss of natural beauty D safety and security D Animal habW reduction D Environment concems D Privacy issues ComMards: signatrue: . V4 be shared with Ofne'ais from the Crty of Edina, Three iiivers Park This information * ex for email and phone numbers) ro riate orsmizations. District and the 9 NNice Creek Watershed District and other app www. ileCreek org RECEIVED JUL 0, 12009 Subject: RE: City council representative Hi Lynette I need our elected Council person within the City's layers and levels that has strong influence in holding accountable another department of the City to perform mowing of the weeds and vegetation within the City Promenade grounds owned by the City in the 7200 York ave block. York Plaza Apartments (7230 York Ave so) made a complaint earlier in the month to Tom Shirley who passed the buck to Heather Worthington who passed the buck to the General Contractor who apparently does not care about maintaining any responsibility of weed and vegetation control. The City apparently does not care holding the General Contractor responsible for mowing this out of control vegetation located along the Promenade. Bottom line: The Promenade grounds along the south and west areas of the York Plaza apartments look like the ghetto and if our apartment grounds (out of control vegetation not mowed- over a foot high) looked like the City Promenade grounds we would be immediately cited by the City for ordinance violation. So I need to solicit our Council person who represents over, 800 residents that live in the 7200 block of York to getting the Promenade mowed. Please advise on which Council person represents the 7200 block of York Ave and please advise who else you believe would be interested in taking ownership of this embarrassment. I want to send photos of what I am referring to capture this clear issue in vivid color. ( "a picture will paint a thousand words ") Page 1 of 2 RECEIVED JUN 2 51M Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:42 PM To: Tom Jenson Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Air Quality: Pollution from outdoor fire pits and fireplaces From: Lynn jo [ma i Ito: starwh itestarry@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:37 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Re: Air Quality: Pollution from outdoor fire pits and fireplaces Dear Mayor James Hovland, and Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson, Below is the email sent to the State Department of Health regarding the use of backyard open fire pits and the response. The specific fire pit whose smoke enters our house eminates from Kevin Deegan on 6529 Ridgeview Dr. Edina, MN. 55439, phone 952- 944 -7305. We were not contacted about the fire. Have no idea if the other regulations were followed. Am sending this information to you, because the smoke penetrates our house causing allergic reactions and the stink is unbearable. We have no wish to endure another smoke -out. Please consider the information from Chuck Strobel and consider looking at tougher regulations for backyard burning. We are living in tight urban conditions and not a backwoods campground. Sincerely, Lynn Johnson 6533 Ridgeview Dr. Edina, MN. 55439 952- 941 -4472 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Lynn jo [mai Ito: starwhitestarry@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 11:14 PM To: *MDH_risk Subject: Air Quality: Pollution from outdoor fire pits and fireplaces Hi, Today our neighbor burned wood in a backyard metal fire pit. The blue -gray smoke billowed and rose ready for Indian smoke messages. The sour, foul, stench found its way via around doors, windows, 6/25/2009 Page 2 of 2 and the outside air ducts into our entire house . It was impossible to enjoy TV with the windows and doors closed even with the furnace fan turned on to filter the air. Eyes watered, nose.ran with allergy, and breathing became difficult. ISN'T THERE A LAW AGAINST OUTSIDE NOXIOUS SMOKE ODORS MAKING ONE'S HOUSE UNLIVABLE? The burning went on for hours this afternoon. Finally went and talked to the neighbor and called the Edina Fire Department. In winter, wood fireplaces also pollute the air and seep into the house. Is there a way to add to the Minnesota Freedom to Breath Act a provision to regulate these offsite larger than tobacco fire smoke polluters? Sincerely, Lynn Johnson From: Chuck Stroebel (MDH) <Chuck.Stroebel @state.mn.us> To: "starwhitestarry@yahoo.com" <starwhitestarry@yahoo.com> Cc: *MDH_risk <Health.Risk @state.mn.us> Sent: Friday, June 5, 2009 9:31:20 AM Subject: FW: Air Quality: Pollution from outdoor fire pits and fireplaces Ms. Johnson, I'm very sorry to hear about smoke from your neighbor's fire pit. This sounds like a challenging situation. Wood smoke concerns are handled at the local level in Minnesota, so you might check with your city or county to see if they have a local ordinance that applies. You also might consider raising your concerns about wood smoke with your state legislators to raise awareness and inquire about the possibility of introducing a bill or modifying existing legislation. Some local municipalities in Minnesota, at the request of citizens, are examining their ordinances related to fires and wood burning devices (e.g., fire pits, outdoor wood boilers). For example, the City of Maplewood formed a wood smoke task force that is advising their city council on possible measures. I include the topic of wood smoke health risks in nearly every air quality presentation that I make (e.g., to health professionals, local organizations). There are several pollutants of concern in wood smoke, including fine particles: hftp://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/air/pm.htm The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the lead state environmental regulatory agency, is evaluating data on wood smoke and examining other steps that may be taken to address this issue. MPCA has a good summary web page on this topic: hftp://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/Woodsmoke/index.htmi I hope this information is helpful, and again, I'm very sorry about this difficult situation. If you or your local officials have questions about health risks from wood smoke, I am available to discuss this issue further at: 651/201 -4927. Regards, Chuck 6/25/2009 w9tA,1� RECEIVED o e 4 JUN 18 2009 r 0 City of Edina June 18, 2009 Mr. Mike Peck 5608 Benton Avenue Edina, MN 55436 -2206 Dear Mr. Peck: I would like to apologize for the unsafe driving that forced you to take evasive action on Highway 100 on June 11. You are correct that there is no justification for placing people in harm's way in order to enforce traffic laws. I have checked our record system and found that we had four officers working a speed enforcement detail that morning. I have spoken to all four officers about the complaint and the need for safety. All claim that they do not remember this type of maneuver. If you recall a squad number I can deal individually with that officer to ensure he or she gets the message. I do appreciate you taking the time to advise me of this incident. Traffic safety is a priority for us and it is unacceptable for us to be contributing to the problem. We do have a strict disciplinary policy in regards to driving behavior and officer involved accidents. I am confident that review of this incident with the officers will stress the importance of safe driving. If ybu do have a squad number or questions for me please call me at 952- 826 -0467. Sincerely, r Mike Siitari Chief of Police cc: Mayor Hovland Edina Police Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 Fax (952) 826 -1607 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 Mike Peck 5608 Benton Ave Edina, MN 55436 -2206 952- 922 -8536 Michael Siitari Edina Police Chief Edina. City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 June 12, 2009 Subject: reckless and careless driving by Edina Police —10:20 June 11. Dear Chief, On June 11, my family and I, including children ages 4 and 7, were driving south on Highway 100. We were in the far right lane and traffic was heavy. Up ahead, I noticed an Edina Police Car parked on the far right side of the road. All of a sudden this police car darted in front of our car at a 30 -40 degree angle. We slammed on our brakes to avoid an accident and luckily were not rammed from behind. This police car then crossed directly in front of a large semi truck that was along side of us, nearly causing an accident with that truck. All the while there were no lights turned on by this police car. As the police car crossed over, at a 30 -40 degree angle into the far left lane, the lights came on and a speeding driver was pulled over. The careless and reckless nature of this incident has forced me to write this letter as my wife and I feel this reckless behavior in heavy traffic must be stopped before someone is killed. I can understand the importance of trying to keep drivers within the speed limit. However, there is no justification for this type of reckless driving by your police force. Quickly darting across 3 lanes of heavy traffic will have no positive outcome at all and in time there will be an accident. Please consider changing the way your officers conduct themselves on State Highways. Sincerely, Mike Peck Cc: Mayor James Hovland RECEIVED JUN 2 5 2009 Dear Mr. Sullivan: Thank you for your reply letter of 5 -5 -09. I apologize for my delay in responding. I was on vacation when it arrived and read it upon my return on the 13th. Immediately upon my return from Italy, I experienced a health issue requiring major surgery on June 1St Your response to my request for a solution to my driveway issue was for me to propose solutions. While I appreciate your offer to work with me in solving this problem, I am a lay person in your field of expertise. I am confident that given the resources that certainly must be available that this problem can be resolved. Solutions could range from amending the surface so that it is less slippery to reconfiguring it to boulevard -style as in the original plan. My inability to ascend the driveway after reasonable efforts during some snowfalls is the result of the city's reconstruction of the driveway and installation of a sidewalk. I was assured before and during the reconstruction process that the results would be satisfactory and if they were not it would be fixed. I ask that you honor the commitment of the City with a concrete solution to my problem and follow through with a remedy. Thank you for your continued consideration. Sincerely, Lynda Carlson 5105 Halifax C: City Council Wayne Houle Jeff Frahm RECEIVED JUN 17 2009 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 8:31 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Drexel Avenue petition - - - -- Original Message---- - From: shordever @aol.com [mailto:shardever @ aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:50 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Drexel Avenue petition Dear Edina City Council, I am sending one email to all, hoping to avoid redundancy. I am writing to you to support the petition submitted by Shannon Neale addressing the blind corner at the intersection of Drexel and Country Club Road. I am a long time resident of Drexel Avenue. When this intersection was redesigned in 1993, nobody consulted the residents on Drexel or asked our opinion. When we inquired, we were told by both the city council and SRF that if it didn't work out, they would change it back. That was 16 years ago. I am asking you to put Drexel and Country Club Road back the way it was as promised by the traffic safety engineers hired by the City of Edina (SRF) years ago and to address other concerns separately. This is a bad intersection. Thank you. Sharon and Don Fleischmann 4621 Drexel Avenue RECEIVED Susan Howl IIIN t 7 1= om: Lynette Biunno .sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 8:24 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: to City Council Members and Mayor of Edina - June 16th Meeting - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kelly Jackson [mailto: jackson4626 @mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5 :04 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: to City Council Members and Mayor of Edina - June 16th Meeting To whom it may concern; This email is in support of the petition to "square -off" the intersection of Drexel and Country Club. Our household has signed the petition, and as residents living close to the intersection in question it has been our observation that drivers frequently take the corner at a speed that would be unsafe should they need to make a sudden stop for pedestrians, or any other reason. It is our hope that by realigning the corner so that it is similar to the one at Casco and Country Club, it will force drivers heading north on Drexel to make a more deliberate turn, instead of the accelerating turn the current situation encourages. We chose this neighborhood 6 years ago when we relocated to Edina from the Chicago area because we liked ie family- friendly atmosphere. The children frequently play together in the front yards while parents .supervise and connect with one another; this creates a genuine sense of community that, while not unique to the Country Club neighborhood, is one of the big reasons we chose to live-here. That said, it is truly frightening to see the speed at which many drivers come around the corner in question - especially when there are small children playing on the sidewalks mere feet from the roadside. Although I know of no parent that allows their child to play in the street, there are occasions when balls, etc. need to be retrieved from the street or unfortunately, times when children dart unexpectedly into the street. The fact that crosswalks are scheduled to be installed at the end of that turn adds another worrisome element to the equation. I urge you to seriously consider the proposed change. Thank you all for your time, and for all you do to make Edina a great place to live. Kelly & Jamie Jackson 4626 Drexel Ave. RECEIVED Subject: Drexel Avenue Petition JUN 17 ZON Dear Council Members, I am writing to you in support of the petition to redesign the intersection of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road. The current intersection, which was adopted in 1993 during the Browndale Bridge initiative, is a blind corner when you approach Drexel Avenue heading north east from Country Club Road. Since this redesign there have been three documented accident. One of which was myself while traveling south on Drexel, I was hit by a car that had slingshot across the intersection attempting to go north on Drexel coming from Wooddale and Country Club. I had over $7000.00 worth of damage to my car. The blame of the accident was on the other driver as they were traveling too fast and they were on .my side of the street as that is how the intersection has been designed, the tendency is to go left. I have also witnessed many near misses. This Intersection is also very dangerous for pedestrians. Even with the installation of new cross walks pedestrians will still not be visible until the driver is actively in their turn entering Drexel Avenue. I respectfully disagree with Wayne Houles position of rejecting the Drexel residence petition for redesigning this intersection. He states that this will bring up traffic calming issues again in the neighborhood. The residence of Drexel are not asking for traffic calming. We are asking you to redesign the intersection for safety reasons. I do not believe that the petitioned design will have any effect on the number of cars coming down the street. It will simply increase the visibility of the driver turning onto Drexel. I am sure you will agree that it is in the best interest of the City to redesign this intersection so that there is only one way in and one way out of the intersection. Currently there are two lanes onto Drexel from Country Club and two lanes leaving Drexel to Country Club. Ihope you have had a chance to experience this intersection yourself. The construction workers have also commented on driver behavior at this intersection as it is a blind corner. Thank you for your attention to this matter Sincerely, Marcia Herman 4602 Drexel Avenue RECEIVED JUN 17 2009 c"kn 15 , � co q Rgo- OOM m ow ROW21 "WIMLwaAM" G �� �-u�4 �., ,v$ _ w9zA. RECEIVED o e t JUN 191009 City of Edina June 18, 2009 Mr. Tom Skramstad 28020 Woodside Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Citation #409438878 Dear Mr. Skramstad: I am sorry that your experience at the Art Fair was less than pleasant due to the parking citation you received. Your letter to the Mayor was referred to me since parking enforcement falls under my department. The violation number 169.34(1) A7 refers to the Minnesota State statute, which applies to all public roads in Minnesota. When I tested for a driver's license (years ago) this was one of the questions on the written exam. All licensed drivers should be aware of the rules of the road, including parking. I am not aware of any jurisdiction that allows less restrictive rules for parking near a stop sign. Our officers try to exercise leniency during the Art Fair because of the congestion and difficulty in parking. However, the officer felt that the location of your car contributed to a dangerous situation because it reduced visibility and access at the intersection. Our officers have to balance the need for traffic safety with the overflow parking situation. I would offer an alternative that I have used when I received a parking ticket I felt was unfair — schedule a time to present your case to a Hearing Officer at one of the Hennepin' County Court Offices. The times are by appointment so the time commitment is minimal and they are willing to listen to a reasonable argument for leniency. I have had my fine reduced when I presented my case. The Hearing Officer has the ability to reduce fines and this is the best I can offer you at this point. Sincerely, Mike Siitari Chief of Police cc: Mayor Hovland Edina Police Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Fax (952) 826 -1607 Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 June 7, 2009 Mayor Jim Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2009 Today I had the pleasure of attending the Edina Art Fair. It was enjoyable to not have the rain to contend with, which would have been the case had I attended yesterday. But there was rain on my "parade" after all; when I returned to my car I found a parking ticket. I had parked some 10 or 15 feet from the corner on a residential street (49"' and Arden). The citation (copy enclosed) stated that a parked car must be 30 feet from the stop sign. How am I supposed to know this? In my city (Excelsior) we can park up close to the stop signs. Other cities I have visited have small signs on the stop sign post that says "No Parking Within 30 Feet." There was no practical way for me to know this ordinance. I went to your website looking for ordinance 169- 34- 1 -A -7. Guess what ?; I can't find any ordinance anywhere on your website with that ordinance number. I looked all over the site and finally found language that uses the distance "30 feet": 1405.01 Clear View Zone Defined. The triangular area formed by connecting the following three points: the point of intersection of the curb lines extended of intersecting streets, and a point on each curb line 30 feet from the aforementioned point of intersection I also found this language that uses the distance "5 feet"; 1400.10 Parking, Stopping and Standing; Loading. Subd. 1 Additional Parking Rules. No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: B. Within five feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway. . How is a law abiding citizen from a neighboring community supposed to know this rule? Your website seems to contradict itself – is it 5 feet or 30 feet? Does a visitor have to read your regulations from top to bottom before coming to your city? I hope you enjoy the $24 that I will send in. But this is the last time 1 will go shopping in downtown Edina. I saw other tickets on cars that were parked illegally like mine. The Edina Art Fair draws thousands of people from all over the Twin Cities. And this is how Edina welcomes them? Wow. Sincerely, —,-Q5 Tom Skramstad 28020 Woodside Road Excelsior, MN 55331 J JAMES VAN VALKENBURG 4204 Philbrook Lane RECEIVED Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 922 -2982 JUN 2 3 2009 June 21, 2009 Eric Amundson Edina Police Department re: Identity Theft Thank you again for your excellent and thorough presentation at our Gyro meeting. It was well received and we all appreciate your efforts. Thank you, Jim Van Valkenburg cc: Gordon Hughes / Jim Hovland rV/ o P .I I� i RECEIVED JUL 0 1 2009 �J r ij ! /I 1 i tt - W rr le y 1 City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jack, RECEIVED JUN 2 Z 2009 Attn: Jack Sullivan, Public Works Re: 4711 Meadow Rd backyard June 18, 2009 I'd like to invite you (and any possible potential contractor) to visit my back yard.. It is particularly pleasant after a rain or a mowing and sweeping on a bright and breezy day such as we enjoyed over the Memorial Day weekend. I would like you to see firsthand the accommodation we have made to the difficult topography over the years. There is nothing that would induce me to give it up voluntarily, and I can't see that the City of Edina has the right to take it without replacement in kind. Should I be deprived of the pursuit of happiness in the enjoyment in my own back yard by a public project that reduces our safety and privacy as well? Enclosed are pictures as seen from our deck and kitchen window at various seasons of the year. If this project has a late fall start, my concern is that we will be left to over - winter with a tall prison -like fence (backside) and an inaccessible un- plantable (post- construc- tion debris and clay /mud slide (like the situation behind Hooten Cleaners where even a commercial enterprise could not afford to landscape adequately.) while in the interim, our property value will have been significantly diminished along with the now pleasant view from my kitchen window and deck. I would like assurances from the City that they are planning to ameliorate or avoid as much of the unpleasant aspect and costs of this construction project instituted for the benefit of others. Should I be getting estimates from landscapers and independent engineers to tell me how that can be accomplished, or is that part of the City's plan and obligation or part of the easement budget and arrangement? Hope to hear from you soon.. Kathy Schmid (952- 922 -2711) cc: Mayor Hovland Councilperson Joni Bennett Encs.. City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Staff, Attn: Jack Sullivan, Public Works Re: 4711 Meadow Rd retaining wall and fence replacement construction, necessitated by proposed sidewalk on West side of France Avenue 47th to 48th Streets The 65' cut lannon terrace averaging about 38" inside our property line and 44" high was done properly with correct footing , dry stacked, tilted and backfilled just right with plantable soil. It hasn't shifted in the more than two decades since it was done at a cost of $2,000. It supports seven antique wagon wheels, cultivator, sleds, milk cans and other iron memorabilia of historic and family interest.. Will the City move them to a side fence area and then replace them or will we be compensated for locating someone to do the moving and replacement? I have three yard workers who work for a total of $60 per hour and are careful in their work. We are not able to do this kind of heavy lifting at this point. I would hope the terrace wall could be protected as well as the double tree growing out of the northeasterly corner as we are losing several others outside the fence. If not I would expect it would be re- stacked and appropriately filled a little closer in. I fear being left with a prison like fence wall with the least attractive side facing the house and an ugly unplantable mud slide such as the one left behind Hooten Cleaners at 49 Y2 Street where a new fence was built above an old wall. Not even a commercial business could afford re- landscaping that more accessible area. I hope the bid winning contractors will have been made aware of these considerations and the City of Edina will, as previously indicated, put us back in at least as good condition as our previously safe /secure exterior, the easily maintained, now less wooded interior between the wall and lower lawn, where day lilies, wild geraniums, violas and shrubs etc. have grown. Yours very truly, Enc. Kathy Schmid, P.S. The Mpls water stop box or turn off valve has been flagged. Will we be provided a locator and /or key for emergency use once the sidewalk is in? TOPOGRAPHY At 4711, the center of the block, we are closest to the street and have the steepest incline below France Ave. WATER SHUT OFF Our 69 year old Mpls water line /shutoff valve is in the ditch or ravine just outside our fence and barely locatable at this time. If it should damaged or interfered with, we have been told our house would be "flooded off the foundation ". 65' FENCE Existing adequate and expensive cedar fence to 6 feet tall at the street level and a required 4 foot skirting fence below it to prevent street trash etc. from rolling in. Industrial size fence posts (8" x 8" x 16' creosoted bridge timber installed by Tele- Electric drill rig) and a 65' cut lannin stone wall support the fence against most snow plow damage. We should not have to pay an exorbitant price or assessment to replace for the convenience (not safety) of Morningside walkers (realistically how many ?) and 50th Street merchants. There are stop lights to cross France Ave at 44th, Sunnyside, 491/2 and 50th Streets and plowable side walks in front of homes on the East side. SNOW DAMAGE France Ave snow plowing creates mounds of frozen ice and dirt that would make a sidewalk impassable in the winter. Sidewalk plowing by Edina would leave nowhere for snow and ice disposal with the exception of the ditch behind our fence which already suffers from snow and ice thrown by high speed street plows. GUARD RAIL Sidewalk would be further impeded by an existing and expensive guard rail protecting 4711. and parts of 4709 and 4713 which was installed many years ago after a car plunged into a bedroom window at 4711 The existing situation has served to provide privacy, reasonably block noise, prevent vandal- . ism, trespassing and theft between 47th and 48th though not entirely, as police reports show recent attempts at break -ins. A street level sidewalk would exacerbate all of these considerations. We request the City Council reconsider this proposal and leave us "as is" or make us whole without penalty.. K. Schmid (952) 922 -4711 11 -19 -08 `three S�� soh h e ✓Ry �Y lA�� .w ■ 6mi _ tt►*"3� �!'�':q � °rte "1 - �� � lb AL �f I 1 ` ,,. W- �j,I 1�l 11-1 •, .r . i 1 w. v 1 , K r�, '► • i s I r �t a�•,. +' ./ 1. ,.,k�tr,� ,'�gs -- � _ ,., E �i sue►: � `�. _ .}.- '• r� • - �° � tr Al low MJ ar h v. ;•a �j.- .�'_rt� � --AWN, ? 1. ;• •,• e, y ?�} T.' i - • �• may- . " --o--ze-, Kathryn Schmid June 19, 20®9 4711 meadow R Edina, MN 55424 o Dismantle existing Lannon Stone wall and save: [Saone to be saved on site ] Total .... ...................­.......$ 720.00 o Construct new stone wall [approx 65'x3']: [ Use exsti g wall stone ] [ New planting soil added above wall ] Total.. ..................._..........$ 3,510.00 Tree Options Variety Eke Prim each installed o Autumn Blaze Wple 2° B&B $ 640.00 3 "BIB $ BBODD o Royal Real Norway Maple 2° B&B $ 829.00 " y 2 1/2" B&B $ 985.00 ® Common Hackberry 2° ®&B $ 652.00 3" B&B $ 907.00 ® Autumn Purple Ash 2 12' B&B $ 652.00 o Greenspire Linden 2" B&B $730.00 3" B&B $1,120.00 o Redmond Linden 2" B&B $ 685.00 3" B&B - $ 880.00 r e 4-,V 1- Y o e ' REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. C. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: July 7, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED JUL 01200 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 12:44 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Testimony for Edina City Council meeting July 7th Importance: High Attachments: Testimony on behalf of Three Circles to Edina City Council Members, July 7 meeting.pdf From: Melisa.Franzen [mailto:Melisa.Franzen @target.com] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:29 AM To: Lynette Biunno; Cary Teague; Gordon Hughes; jhovland @krausehovland.com Cc: Nathan B. Franzen; Melisa.Franzen Subject: Testimony for Edina City Council meeting July 7th Importance: High Greetings, Please accept the attached written testimony on behalf of the Three Circles Neighborhood for the July 7th City Council meeting pertinent to the agenda item addressing the proposed maintenance facility at Interlachen Country Club. Regards, Melisa Lopez Franzen I Sr. Policy Advocate - Civic Affairs I OTargel I Government Affairs 11000 Nicollet Mall TPS-32751 Minneapolis, MN 554031 612.696.0097 (ph) 1 651.336.7250 (cell) 1612.696.5500 (tax) 7/2/2009 July 2, 2009 Edina City Council 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Mayor James Hovland, Council Member Joni Bennett, Council Member Mary Brindle, Council Member Scot Housh, Council Member Ann Swenson Dear City Council Members, We are submitting this written testimony on behalf of the Three Circles Neighborhood to clarify our position on the proposed maintenance facility at Interlachen Country Club ( "ICC "). Despite the fact that residents of Three Circles have met with representatives from ICC to address landscaping and buffer options, the neighborhood still finds itself divided with regards to the proposed maintenance facility and does not support the project due to the unreasonable size of the maintenance building and its close proximity to a residential area. We recognize positive adjustments to the landscape plan have been proposed, however, we have not received a written commitment from ICC nor any plans to date that formalize the outcome of our recent meetings. Therefore, it would be premature for the neighborhood to acquiesce to the proposed plans. In addition, the neighborhood has been forced to negotiate with ICC in a vacuum since the current code does not legally allow for the proposed building to be constructed in the first place. Furthermore, we contend that proper notice has not been complied with and the Planning Commission wrongfully considered the plans for a maintenance facility regardless of the fact that the proposed building did not comply with applicable zoning laws. We address these arguments in further detail below: Negotiations with ICC Our current negotiations with ICC have not been in bad faith as we are trying to minimize the impact to our neighborhood should the City choose to disregard the law and approve the plans submitted by ICC. We concede that positive adjustments to the landscape plan have been proposed, but again we have not seen a current plan incorporating our discussions and a written commitment from ICC that the buffer from the oversized building will be enhanced to the neighborhood's standards. Public Notice The neighborhood contends that due process has been jeopardized. The fact that the notices sent for the Planning Commission meeting were for a CUP and not a variance as required by code was improper. The Planning Commission got around that hurdle by arguing the building was associated with the parking lot and hence they had the authority to review the proposal as a whole. The neighborhood maintains that action was erroneous given the fact that the proposed building did not comply will all applicable zoning codes as required by law. If an Edina resident submitted a proposal that on its face did not comply with the code, the City would never recommend it to go to Planning Commission unless it was asking for the appropriate variance or CUP, if applicable. In this case, the proper action from the City would have been to require ICC to submit a CUP for the parking lot and a separate variance application for the oversized building. The City and the Planning Commission completely disregarded the established process and reviewed a plan that was not ripe for consideration until the proper notices had been given to impacted residents. The City is changing rules midway through the process and not following its own laws and ordinances. The current public notifications are misleading at best and we believe unlawful. It assumes the proposed text change has already been approved. The public deserves proper notification. Why are the residents the ones who are enforcing the City's own rules? The Zoning Board should be hearing this proposal and not the City Council. Opposition of the building location Let it be clear that the neighborhood is not arguing that the building not be constructed on ICC property. The neighborhood simply does not support the location of the oversized building so close to our residences. The fact that ICC has moved the building 10 feet away is not a reasonable accommodation to our concerns about noise and the potential nuisance that will be created. Furthermore, the City should find that ICC has other reasonable alternatives to locate the building. ICC has not provided acceptable reasons for deeming the proposed site the last and only available option. ICC relies on the fact that the proposed location is a "dump' and used to be a "chicken coup" approximately 50 years ago. That argument is irrelevant. There are numerous examples in the City of Edina where a less desired use has been enhanced and not the other way around. Case in point is Centennial Lakes, where 20 years ago the site used to be a sand /gravel pit and now is a park that has become subject of community pride. It is the City's duty to guard residents from unreasonable development that does not follow the intent of the comprehensive plan and that is legally unfounded. Conclusion ICC has operated for decades without this maintenance facility, they can wait a reasonable amount longer to allow for a thorough analysis of the impact such an ordinance change will have on neighborhoods and the City of Edina as a whole. A thorough review of the code should take place before taking action on this precedent setting proposal. Does Edina want metal sheds littered throughout the City? Why is the City not following the guidance of the comprehensive plan and addressing the "massing" of this building (170' long with metal siding). This is not acceptable. This is a precedent setting decision that will impact adjacent neighborhoods, schools, churches and golf courses into the future. The fact that the City has not enforced its own ordinance and that buildings have been erected in complete disregard to the law is unconscionable. Three Circles residents should not pay for such a substantial oversight on behalf of the City. The City should amend the ordinance to address the need of ICC and other similarly situated property owners, but through a more comprehensive approach. We respectfully request that the City Council vote to table this proposal until the City follows the appropriate notice laws and provides a comprehensive analysis of the pros and cons of changing the ordinance that takes into account the safeguards that need to be in place to avoid creating a nuisance in a residential area and provides a public value. Respectfully Submitted, Nathan & Melisa Franzen on behalf of the Three Circles Neighborhood 6216 Maloney Avenue Edina, MN 55343 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:03 PM Cc: Susan Howl RECEIVED JUL 0 610 Page 1 of 1 Subject: FW: Case File 2008.0013.09a Interlachen Country Club "Maintenance" Building Conditional Use Permit From: Lorraine Cunningham [mailto:raicunn @webtv.net] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:26 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Case File 2008.0013.09a Interlachen Country Club "Maintenance" Building Conditional Use Permit TO: All City Council Members I understand that the Edina Planning Commission has given its approval for the construction of the new multi -use building on the grounds of Interlachen Country Club. I am totally opposed to the placement of this building. IF this is the only space available for such use, it should be moved further East so as not to intrude upon the residents of Kresse Circle and Maloney Avenue. The activities, the noise and the lights will certainly diminish the desired quality -of- living in this normally quiet and peaceful neighborhood. Property values will decrease because of such a building being so close, I realize that the Club members do not want this proposed building to interfere with their enjoyment of the beautiful grounds but why should an established neighborhood have it foisted upon them? Please consider the effects on the home - owners and refuse approval. Thank You. Lorraine H. Cunningham 6305 Maloney Avenue Edina, MN 55343 952 - 935 -5756 7/6/2009 Minutes of the Edina Park Board May 12, 2009 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Hulbert, Jeff Sorem, Ray O'Connell, Randy Meyer, Bill Lough, Keeya Steel, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus MEMBERS ABSENT: Jennifer Kenney, Ben Pobuda, Todd Fronek STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Janet-Canton, Ed MacHolda I. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 14, 2009 PARK BOARD MINUTES Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 14, 2009 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Ray O'Connell SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Edina Garden Council Presentation — Diane Bomsta, president of the Edina Garden Council and Deb Armstrong, president of their youth and a member of "Friends of Garden Park" presented some information to the Park Board about the Edina Garden Council and gave a power point presentation. Mr. Keprios thanked the Garden Council for everything they have contributed to the city and noted that they are an amazing group and he really does appreciate everything they do. B. YEA Corp Proposal for Chowen Park — Mr. Keprios gave a power point presentation to show the brief history on where they are to date with the YEA Corp proposal for Chowen Park. He pointed out that this really is a request to privatize parkland; it is not the same concept as a community garden, it is completely different. He pointed out that currently there is no policy or ordinance that prohibits this type of use for a park. He explained that they have privatized parkland in the past because the golf dome wasn't always owned by the City of Edina; however, the city always owned the property. Therefore a precedent has been set in past practice. He indicated that because there is no written policy on how to deal with these they are dealt with on a case by case basis. Mr. Keprios pointed out that as his Staff Report states he recommends that the Park Board recommend to the City Council that the YEA Corps request be approved for a one -year trial basis with the following conditions: 1. The site must be well kept, clean and safe for all park users at all times. 2. YEA Corps must provide liability insurance that includes the City of Edina as an additional insured. 3. After one growing season, YEA Corps must make another formal request to be granted use of the site for the following year. 4. If denied the right to continue to use the space for a garden, YEA Corps must. restore the site to its original grass condition at their own expense. He noted that he further recommends that the YEA Corps be held responsible for all of their own expenses. In other words, they must pay for and provide their own soils and materials needed to construct the garden. Mary Helen Franze, 5717 Chowen Avenue, noted that she would like to make two points. First, when they talk about metal in design it's really chicken wire. Secondly, in terms of self - sustaining operations this is a new non - profit and they are vigorously fundraising in any way they can as well as all of their projects use resourceful practices. She noted they are teaching the youth they can attempt to do anything if they are resourceful and put together good prudent working skills and practices. She indicated that Edina Hardware is going to donate some items. Therefore, if the city does not want to cooperate with donating and delivering pesticide free soils they do have a back -up plan. Mr. Sorem asked Ms. Franze if she is confident they can uphold the conditions staff has stated as far as maintenance, clean-up etc. to which Mr. Franze replied absolutely. Mr. Hulbert stated that he loves the idea but he keeps struggling with the use of public land and does feel it sets a little bit of precedence. Mr. Hulbert asked if any of the parents might be willing to donate a little bit of their backyard for this project but hold their meetings at the park. He indicated that he is also struggling with the safety of a three foot fence with poles that are sticking up in right field of the little ball field. Mr. Hulbert commented that he has been driving around trying to think of areas in Edina that could possibly be turned into a large community garden. Mr. Lough stated that from the beginning he thought this was a very good idea in concept. He noted that he doesn't look on this as a community garden but rather as an education opportunity for kids which is something that does. fall within Park and Recreation. He commented that he doesn't see this as any sort of precedent or potential okay for anything that might resemble a community garden in the future without other kinds of work or research, presentations and proposals going into it first. He explained that if he limits this in his mind to an educational effort for the kids in this particular park area and with the residents going along with• it and with the exceptions that have been stated, there is a difference between a community garden and an education project. Mr. O'Connell stated that he is strongly in favor of this because it involves young people. He pointed out that they still have control and understand the precedence situation because they've gone through it several times on the Park Board. He explained that in some previous situations there was a strong attempt to completely privatize a large plot and in essence to disaggregate such a beautiful piece of property. Mr. O'Connell commented there are always two sides to the questions and feels in this case the benefits outweigh any negatives. Ms. Steel stated that her issue would be accessibility of the public because she believes there is a place for organizations as far as community gardens. She indicated 2 that with the focus on education perhaps a partnership with the school might be a much more appropriate place since it would be for the children. Mr. Peterson MOVED TO RECOMMEND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Ray O'Connell SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Approved: Jeff Sorem, Ray O'Connell, Bill Lough, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus Denied: Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel B. Community Gardens — Mr. Keprios indicated that at the last Park Board meeting there was a request that staff look into the possibility how to go about developing a community garden and what process should be used to establish appropriate sites. He noted that Chairman Fronek asked him to at least explore what it might cost to hire a consultant to which he found out it would cost approximately $15,000 to do a study and doesn't think they should go down that path. Mr. Keprios pointed out that community gardens never surfaced through the Needs Assessment Survey and asked the Park Board if this is a priority they want staff to direct time and resources to. He noted that if the Park Board does want to go down this road he believes staff can probably come up with at least'a pilot site with the help of staff and volunteers. He commented that in addition they will need to have the resources to develop and maintain the garden site as well as have budget dollars and equipment. Mr. Keprios explained that they will also need to have resources and a system to administer and manage equal access to these garden plots. However the most difficult challenge will be to find an area that is acceptable to those who live closest to the proposed site. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board for a little more direction and then give the staff the charge to figure out a place for it. Mr. O'Connell stated that he would suggest they wait until they get the results from the YEA Corps pilot project and then take a harder look at it in September. He added that currently they have a lot on their plate. Mr. Presthus agreed with Mr. O'Connell and stated that he thinks it can be put off until next January after they've received more information. Mr. Hulbert asked Mr. Keprios what he would expect to get out of $15,000 if they hired a consultant. He also asked wouldn't staff have a pretty good idea if there are any potential areas without having to hire a consultant. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks staff, with the help of volunteers, may be able to come up with a site that would work without having to spend $15,000 on a consultant if they want to go in that direction. Mr. Hulbert stated that he thinks having a community garden would be a great thing if they could just find a good spot for it. Mr. Meyer stated that he thinks there are two issues. First, he thinks they need to come up with a structured policy regarding privatization of public land so that it is a little more straightforward when the Park Board needs to deal with these issues. Secondly, with regards to the community gardens he is concerned-that if they put this off until the fall the reality is that only gives them three or four months to the beginning of next year to pull something together and because it's such a large issue he doesn't think that is a realistic timeline. He noted that he thinks they need to conduct some basic research and really think about if this is something they want and start to put it out to the public because he thinks they are going to get a lot of feedback and input as a result of this. Mr. Peterson informed the Park Board that he found "raised beds" on the internet that a lot of community gardens around the country use. He noted he would like to see what those cost as well as if groups would buy into it. He indicated that he thinks a lot of sites could work with these raised beds. Mr. O'Connell stated that he is not in favor of deferring this for a long period of time. He suggested that each Park Board member look at their assigned park and see if something might work. He also suggested talking to the Garden Council and maybe there is an area they could use at Arneson Acres for a community garden. Mr. O'Connell stated that he would like to get some more viable information and possibly get some concrete results. Mr. Keprios stated that it sounds to him there's a consensus to have staff move forward with volunteers, such as the garden council, and come back in August or September with a site than can be debated. Mr. Keprios explained there is a lot that comes into play with soils, raised beds, resources, etc. He noted that he thinks they can come up with one or two sites by the September time frame. Mr. Lough indicated that he would like to know what processes or alternative processes are used in the set -up and management of community gardens from the standpoint of the city and more importantly from the standpoint of park and recreation. He asked what are things to be cognizant, what are the expenses that are involved, how is the management conducted, etc. He asked Mr. Keprios if the Park Board could get some type of concise presentation about the way staff would envision this is going to operate. He indicated that he thinks this would help a lot and then they could move toward coming up with a site. He noted that he wouldn't like to solicit too much public input or interest at this point until they know what direction they are going. He commented that he would like to get ahead of the curve before it rolls them over. Mr. Lough MOVED FOR STAFF TO DO SOME RESEARCH TO DETERMINE EXPECTED MANAGEMENT, LOGISTICS AND EXPENSES INVOLVED IN ESTABLISHING A COMMUNITY GARDEN AS WELL AS RECOMMEND CRITERIA OR POLICY TO FOLLOW THAT ADDRESSES THE USE OF PUBLIC LAND FOR SUCH AN ENTERPRISE. Rob Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. Ms. Steel stated that she would like to add that they look for opinion on it and engage the public so that when they come back they will have a greater idea of who wants to be involved and possibly what areas show the most interest. Mr. Keprios stated that he needs more information on what process to use for public input. Ms. Steel replied that she is looking for an informal process and is not expecting a mailing but to find something to at least make sure the public is aware of 4 it. Mr. Keprios suggested that possibly they do a press release and request public input on the issue and take that approach. Mr. Meyer commented that sounds like a great idea but another question they may want to ask is for input on whether they are looking for one big plot or for a few plots around town. He stated he thinks the key at this point is to keep it simple and include more information. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios to sum up what it is he is hearing. Mr. Keprios replied it is his understanding that the Park Board would like staff to research what the costs are and resources needed to develop a community garden and also study what all is involved and needed to administer and manage a community garden program offering more so than where the garden is going to be located. Mr. Keprios stated that he will study the best practices used by other communities in administering a community garden program and the processes they use. Mr. Keprios also stated that he will solicit public input to gauge the need and desire for a community garden and ask for the community's general recommendations on the topic. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. Pamela Park Scoreboards and Batting Cage — Mr. Keprios gave a power point presentation on Pamela Park. He informed the Park Board the Edina Girls Fast Pitch Association (EGFA) has requested an additional batting cage and pitching tunnel basically for the safety and protection of anyone using the park. Mr. Keprios pointed out that EGFA recently came forward and have offered to donate money to put up three electronic wireless scoreboards. He showed the Park Board a picture of what they would look like. Mr. Keprios explained that as far as this donation goes it would need to be accepted by the City Council via resolution before they can move forward. Mr. Keprios indicated that he sent out letters and a map to all of the neighbors who live within 500 feet of the softball fields which ended up being approximately 75 households. He noted that to date he has received three a -mails and one letter to which none were favorable toward the project. Mr. Keprios explained that Pamela Park is characterized as a Community Playfield and it is the largest of eight community playfields in Edina. He noted that all of community playfields have at least one or more scheduled athletic activities such as soccer, football, baseball, softball and hockey. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he did hear some comments that the process they used was inadequate and wasn't given to enough households and it wasn't time -wise long enough. He commented that if the Park Board agrees with that assessment and is not satisfied with the notification process then his recommendation would be to delay the decision at least on one, if not both, the scoreboards and batting cage /pitching tunnel projects. Mr. Presthus asked if they would consider possibly doing just one scoreboard this year on field #1 where the high schools girls play. Mr. Keprios replied that he feels that could be a reasonable option worthy of consideration. Mr. Sorem asked what the needs are for three scoreboards and asked if tournaments are held there. He also asked if all three scoreboards will be needed at the same time and if it would be cost effective to install all three at once. Bruce Johnson, EGFA President, replied that since the fences were put in down the foul line last year that has improved the facility and made it safe. This summer they have two tournaments scheduled at Pamela Park. He also commented that when they host league games during the summer they can often have three games going on at the same time. Mr. Johnson stated that as far as cost this is a project they were thinking they might do as a partnership with the schools and possibly the school could contribute to it as well. He indicated he is not the treasurer but he knows they have the funding right now for one but most likely two. They do not have the funds to do all three this year. Mr. Meyer stated that what he thinks he is hearing from the neighbors is that this is an aesthetics issue. He asked Mr. Keprios if they have looked at putting in some evergreens behind these or if they could try to do something to make it less intrusive as a part of the overall park. In addition he asked if the scoreboards could be mounted a little lower so they aren't quite as intrusive or obvious from someone walking by. Mr. Meyer noted that he is just looking to see if there are ways they could make it aesthetically a little more appealing or pleasant to the neighbors. Mr. Peterson asked if they've thought about putting the three scoreboards behind the home plates and use it as a triangle labeled fields #1, #2, #3. Mr. Johnson replied that they would be open to looking at anything because the scoreboards do not need to be put in one specific location. Karen Amundson, 5905 Oaklawn Ave., indicated that she has been an Edina resident for 42 years and commented how very disappointed the situation at Pamela Park has arisen and the lack of involvement with the neighborhood. She noted that the vast majority of her neighbors have not had any opportunities during the planning sessions to give any input whatsoever. Mrs. Amundson pointed out that black fences were installed at Pamela Park without the knowledge of this community knowing that it was going to take place. She also stated that beyond the aesthetics of the fence they have also noticed a big change in the lack of use relative to winter cross country skiing and other activities on the north end of the park due to the fence being installed. Ms. Amundson asked whether these changes were appropriate in light of how this is gong to change the character of this neighborhood park. She explained that her concern is two -fold; was a fair process of review made available to residents to be viewed and second the merits of proposed changes. She commented whoever is on the task force committee representing the neighborhood have not been engaged with the neighborhood. Mrs. Amundson also noted that the minutes from the March 10`h Park Board meeting stated "the mission is to hopefully get a consensus from the task force so that they will be ready to go out to the greater community to seek their input and invite them to the Park meeting ", she stated that never occurred. In fact, this is the first invite in which they have been notified to express their opinion. She stressed that she is strongly opposed to the scoreboards being installed and in addition she has no idea how the park will be used and has no idea of any long -term plans, she added that her greatest fear is that this will virtually turn Pamela Park into a sports complex. Ms. Amundson informed the Park Board that she has a petition signed by approximately 50 neighbors on such short notice opposing the installation of these scoreboards. She requested that there be a time out so that neighbors can be heard. 6 Steve Aura, 5900 Oaklawn Ave., stated that he was surprised to get a letter that was mailed to only a handful of residents that live within 500 feet of the actual playing surface at Pamela Park. He noted that when he went back to the minutes of June 2008 it was noted there would be a meeting with the whole community to have their say regarding $400,000 that would be put into the fields. He stated that it was also mentioned in the November 2008 minutes again that there would be a Pamela Park neighborhood meeting. He indicated that this is the first he has heard of any meeting to discuss this issue. Mr. Aura pointed out that for a 10 x 10 spot at Chowen Park notices were sent to people who live within 1,000 feet of that park. He commented that they never received a letter when they put in 3,000 feet of fence. He indicated that he thinks things are getting slid in little by little and before they know it there will be a big complex with scoreboards and lights. Mr. Aura stated he is asking for this to be put off a little bit until there is a system that involves the neighborhood people, not just the people who live near it but also the people who use the park and let them be heard. Lawrence Anderson, 6012 Oaklawn, noted that he has lived across the street from Pamela Park for 11 years and considers it a huge privilege. He stated the thing that really appealed to them when they purchased their home was the openness of it. He commented that he thinks every one of the 759 houses that live within 1,000 feet of the park use and enjoy the park. Mr. Anderson commented that along with the privilege comes a trade -off because it is a multi -use park/community playfield but feels there is a good deal of balance right now. However, it does seem to get busier every summer. He noted when the park is busy there is a lot of traffic and he is concerned from a safety standpoint of kids running back and forth across the street. Mr. Anderson indicated that people in the general neighborhood treasure the park and therefore would ask that the Park Board really consider before they add scoreboards and before they change the character of the park because once those scoreboards are put in place there is no going back and when he hears the words "sports complex" it' really concerns him. Mr. Johnson commented that he has lived in Edina for 22 years and lives approximately six blocks from Pamela Park. He explained that EGFA does not want to turn the park into a sports complex and they do not want lights because it doesn't fit in that neighborhood and games can be finished before dusk. He noted that he likes the small community park feel as well. He pointed out that EGFA is just looking for some improvements to help their program and the high school's program. He added they are always open to discussion and when Mr. Keprios suggested the Pamela Park taskforce EGFA informed him they would like to sit in on those meetings and listen to as many of the neighborhood people as they could. Dorvom Amundson, 5905 Oaklawn Ave., stated that he appreciates the games but he doesn't think there needs to be big scoreboards. He asked couldn't there be a chalkboard that someone could put the score on. He noted that it would save money and it would be a simple thing to do. He stated there are other ways of showing the parents what the score is. Luanne Kuna, 6008 Oaklawn Ave., noted that she lives right across the street from Pamela Park and she thinks they need to think about their parks and preserve them to be parks and not try to commercialize them. She stated that she realizes there are community events that are happening at the park but when they start putting up electronic things that takes away from the general setting of the park and she feels they need to preserve that. Mr. Hulbert indicated that there doesn't seem to be a problem with the batting cage and pitching tunnel. He noted that the issue just seems to be with the scoreboards and commented that he likes the idea of trying one scoreboard and see how it goes. He added that he also likes the idea of putting in some evergreens to make it more aesthetically pleasing and would like to come to some sort of compromise with the neighborhood. Mr. Presthus stated that he would like to at least see them move forward with the batting cage and pitching tunnel at this time. Mr. Meyer asked who would be using the scoreboards to which Mr. Johnson replied that EGFA because that is their primary location as well as the high school and EYSA. He commented that staff would know if there are any other groups that use it. Mr. Meyer stated that it seems aesthetics is the biggest issue. He noted that he thinks there needs to be a little more homework done to look at where they need it, is there potential interference with other activities and just make sure that we put these in the right place as well as plant trees around them or behind them. Therefore, he thinks there needs to be a little more thought put into it and hear some input from the neighbors. He commented that if this is the path they want to go down they need to think it through and find the best alternative. Mr. Lough pointed out that he has heard the words "aesthetic" and "sports complex" so in addition to everything that's been said to some degree he agrees with trying to find a compromise. He stated that he thinks it needs to be referred back to some group and try and work through what that compromise is. Ms. Steel commented that as Mr. Johnson pointed out he's not sure they even have the money to go ahead with three scoreboards. Therefore, a little more of a concrete plan would be helpful. Mr. Peterson indicated that he thinks the people and groups who use Pamela Park need to have a meeting. He noted that he is not qualified to determine whether it is 500 ft. or 1,000 feet but this group needs to talk about what their needs are and what the residents needs are and try to reach a compromise. Mr. O'Connell asked if they've looked at portable scoreboards that could be on a trailer when games are in progress. Mr. MacHolda replied that was one of the options they presented to the Pamela Park task force and the issue was storage of those portable scoreboards. N. Mr. Keprios first publicly apologized for the way the fencing was handled and noted that it was wrong and they won't make that same mistake again. He explained that the Park Board has tried to discuss a policy to try to address a proper notification process so that doesn't happen again. Mr. Keprios explained that the way parks are getting developed now is there are competing interests groups that want more and want better, they want to be like their neighboring communities. However, it's not always as well received and accepted by the neighborhoods and noted that he understands both sides. Mr. Keprios commented that now he would like to explain the purpose and history behind the task force which consisted of ten residents, three staff and three consultants. He pointed out that four of them are just residents at large who are users of the park who had an interest in helping decide acceptable parameters for the park from other interest groups. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason why everyone isn't notified at this stage in the process is because they need to at least get something on paper to then notify the greater community which is the next agenda item and after a few months get community input and move forward. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the reason this is on the agenda tonight for a decision is because it's been offered up as a donation and was not part of the plan from the start. He commented that the batting cage is funded to go into the ground this year as part of the Capital Improvement Plan and knowing that the neighborhood had not been notified of that park improvement yet, he felt they needed to include that as well. Mr. Keprios informed everyone that regarding all of the other plans; the, neighborhood will be adequately notified and will be given a lot of time to provide feedback. Mr. Keprios indicated that portable scoreboards might be an option and he would be happy to work with the user groups and neighbors to see if there is a compromise rather than have it become an "us" and "them" issue. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board if they could delay the decision on the scoreboards and give staff a chance to revisit it and see if they can come up with an option that serves the competing interests. Mr. Presthus MOVED TO RECOMMEND GOING FORWARD WITH THE BATTING CAGES AND PITCHING TUNNELS AND DO WHAT MR. KEPRIOS SUGGESTED FOR THE SCOREBOARDS. Ray O'Connell SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. D. Pamela Park Task Force — Mr. Keprios went over some of the work the Pamela Park task force has done to date and noted that not much has changed. He pointed out that process -wise the plan is to get this information in a little better detail and in written form from the architect and with the help of staff to get it on -line so that the public can access it. He noted they would also like to get copies that people can come in and view. He would recommend notifying everyone who lives within 1,000 feet of the park as well as do a press release and then wait a few months to let the people get educated and involved because we want their opinion and input. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that it will be awhile before any funding becomes available but they need a starting place. 9 Mr. Keprios indicated that he would like the Park Board to come to a consensus to give staff the direction to start putting a little more information together and get it on- line. He noted that he would like input from the Park Board on a notification procedure in how to address these. He noted that he would basically like to have a public input meeting (public hearing) in an October or November time frame. Mr. Meyer suggested there be some basic dialog with the neighborhood that would be informational in showing the layout, process, etc. because there seems to be a lack of that. He noted that this way when people come to the hearing they will at least have some background as to what is going on. He suggested possibly even meeting at the park with the neighborhood to which Mr. Keprios replied he thinks that's a great idea. Joseph Hulbert MOVED TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO NOTIFY THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS PROPOSED INCLUDING A PRESS RELEASE AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON LINE AND HAVE STAFF CONDUCT A CITIZEN INPUT MEETING AS PROPOSED. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Sorem commented that he wouldn't mind see it go out to the user groups as well. Mr. Hulbert added that amendment. MOVED TO HAVE A COMMUNITY MEETING WITH RESIDENTS WITH USER GROUPS AND REQUEST THAT STAFF WORK ON ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO SHARE AT THE MEETING AS A POTENTIAL COMPROMISE. III. OLD BUSINESS A. Revisions to Relationship Document — Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that this was on an earlier agenda to which the decision was delayed until some researdh could be done to see if we would be well served to be in alignment to whatever the school districts policy is on the exclusion criteria for background check results. He explained that what he learned is that the school district really doesn't have one that addresses the issue and that they are dealt with on a case by case basis. Mr. Keprios stated that he would still like to go with his recommendation and follow the National Recreation Park Association guidelines that he and the athletic associations thought were appropriate so at least there is a time frame more specified for each crime. Randy MEYER MOVED. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. June 2009 Park Board Meeting — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he just learned that the Finance Department has a rather aggressive Capital Improvement Plan process scheduled. He noted that he would really like to be at the June Park Board meeting when it is discussed and noted that he will be out of town on the date [G of the Park Board meeting. Therefore, he asked the Park Board if everyone would be okay if they moved the June Park Board meeting to Wednesday, June 17`h at 7:00 pm in the Council Chambers. Ray O'Connell MOVED TO HOLD THE NEXT PARK BOARD MEETING ON JUNE 17TH AT 7:00 PM. Randy Meyer SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Lough noted that he will not be able to attend on that date. - MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:15 PM r ,ED LFU Bloomington Public Quarterly Report ❑ For the City of Edina January March 2009 r Health January — March 2009 D wu � r Activities in Edina ■ The work of Public Health is defined by six areas of responsibility. This report utilizes the areas of public health responsibility to organize details of activities conducted in Edina. The areas of public health responsibility described in this report are to: Assure an adequate public health infrastructure Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors Assure the quality and accessibility to health services Prepare for and respond to disasters and assist communities in recovery ■ ASSURE AN ADEQUATE PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE • Successfully applied for and was awarded five grants to support emergency preparedness, youth development, intensive home visiting, and health care access. ■ PROMOTE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES AND HEALTHY BEHAVIORS Participated in a panel discussion at the Independent School District 287 Chemical Health Forum. Discussed alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use prevention efforts of the Tri -City Partners for Healthy Youth and Communities coalition. Developed a safe driving pamphlet for seniors with grant money from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety. The pamphlet emphasized driving risks associated with use of medications and alcohol and listed safe driving alternatives. The pamphlet will be promoted and distributed in Bloomington, Richfield, and Edina. Developed a program to encourage use of Fatal Vision Goggles by school and community groups. The goggles are used to demonstrate the dangers of drinking and driving. Lending the goggles is an activity for the goal of reducing DWI and underage alcohol consumption arrests among adolescents in the cities of Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield. Information about the goggles was posted on the Tri -City Partners website and in its newsletter. BPH Quarterly Activities in Edina • Addressed the following topics at monthly Senior Clinics: January "Vitamin D" — general information related to recent news stories about deficiency and its effect on chronic conditions. February "Heart Health" — common signs of heart attacks and differences in women; no sign should be ignored and medical help should be sought immediately. March "Urinary Tract Infections" — recognizing the subtle symptoms and reporting them quickly. • Collaborated with Edina Chemical Health Partners to present information about an Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention training model. The presentation was given by a metro area hospital representative to physicians from three local pediatric clinics. Public Health plans to provide training for physicians interested in using the screening and intervention tool. • Presented information to Edina Public School's Parent Leadership Council about how to become involved in alcohol, tobacco, and other drug -use prevention efforts. Thirty members attended the discussion about involvement opportunities with the Tri- City Partners for Healthy Youth and Communities coalition. The Parent Leadership Council is comprised of parent leaders from each school and key leaders in the district. • Presented information about Public Health services to the Edina Professionals for Seniors group. Focus of the information was on services for vulnerable adults. Edina Professionals for Seniors is a new networking group attended by a Bloomington Public Health staff person. It includes professionals from a variety of service areas, including financial planning, housing, healthcare, and home maintenance. Forty-one people were in attendance. ■ ASSURE THE QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY TO HEALTH SERVICES • Followed -up on 17 senior and vulnerable adult referrals. Public Health Nurses conduct in -home assessments to arrange appropriate resources for clients. This service helps adults to live safely and independently in their homes. In one case, an anonymous caller to Environmental Health expressed concern about the living conditions of an elderly woman. The woman's daughter was her live -in caregiver. A Public Health Nurse and Environmental Health worker did a Joint visit and found no housing issues. However, the daughter was very defensive. The nurse continued to make visits and was able to gain her trust. As a result, the nurse was able to give practical advice on care issues and future living options. The sum of referrals was for health management/self -care issues (9); mental illness (4), housing issues (2), falls (1), and isolation (1). BPH Quarterly Activities in Edina ■ PREPARE FOR AND RESPOND TO DISASTERS AND ASSIST COMMUNITIES IN RECOVERY • Attended the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Summit. • Presented the Alternate Dispensing Modalities Plan to staff at 22 long -term care facilities. • Completed the test of the Health Alert Network for Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield. • Planned Operation Snowball IV and Operation Snowbaby Too — functional exercises being conducted on June 15, 2009. D D B� ua e 1 umbers Report for Edina ■ 2008 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES These numbers are a count ofpeople served each quarter. Some people receive the same service and are counted in more than one quarter. Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 • HEALTH PROMOTION Community health presentations # ofparticipants 442 School educational presentations # ofparticipants 0 Sexual decision - making presentations # ofparticipants 220 • ADULT AND SENIOR SERVICES Senior health receives referrals from police, senior outreach, social services, environmental health and other community agencies for vulnerable adults and falls. Individual clients served # ofclients 17 Public Health Nurse visits # of individual nursing visits 6 Service coordination # of calls and case conferences 28 Senior hearing screening # ofparticipants 17 Senior Community Public Health Nurse Clinics # ofclients 72 # of consultations 107 Health education presentations # ofparticipants 41 • FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES Maternal and Child Health PHN home - visiting # of families 40 # of clients 78 # of visits 127 Car seats # referrals 0 SHIELD # of children 27 Police reports reviewed for follow -up # offamilies 34 South Vista # ofpregnant and/or parenting adolescents 1 Follow Along clients # of children enrolled 35 Child -care consultations # of centers / # of visits made 4/12 High -risk birth certificate follow -up & referrals received 47 # of babies Q2 Q3 Q4 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 ■ CLINIC SERVICES Women, Infants and Children (WIC) # ofparticipants 583 Health Risk Assessment Clinic # ofclients 5 Sage Screening Program # ofclients 15 SagePlus Cardiovascular Screening # ofclients 0 Immunization Clinic # ofadult clients 2 # of immunizations 2 Immunization Clinic # of children 3 # of immunizations 8 Flu shots # of clients 0 Early childhood screenings # of children screened 0 Intake calls & drop -in visits 30 Perinatal Hepatitis B # ofclients 0 Reportable disease follow -up / consultations # of contacts 58 Q2 Q3 Q4 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31, 2008 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Year Ended December 31, 2008 Table of Contents Page Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 1_2 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance With Minnesota State Laws and Regulations 3 MMKRI I - C E RT I F I E D PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council and Residents City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Kenneth W. Malloy, CPA Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 24, 2009. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the City's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report .financial data reliably in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the City's financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by the City's internal control. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected by the City's internal control. (continued) -- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined previously. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the City Council, federal awarding agencies, and pass - through entities and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. M4I1oy , /4161% 0nV&, kAr,�.o�sk.; oPAJBS2✓,'C.G�, Co,,P�{. June 24, 2009 -2- MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS City Council and Residents City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Kenneth W. Malloy, CPA Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 24, 2009. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Governments, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Governments covers seven main categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our study included all of the listed categories. The results of our tests indicate that, for the items tested, the City complied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council, management of the City, and the state of Minnesota and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. /440.,-t-, oe'� Kar�ows k.', IPaJo sa✓.'�1,, -0., � June 24, 2009 -3- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952- 545 -0424 • Telefax: 952- 545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com Management Report for City of Edina, Minnesota December 31, 2008 MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Kenneth W. Malloy, CPA Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Edina's (the City) financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2008. The purpose of this report is to communicate information relevant to city finances in Minnesota and to provide comments resulting from our audit process. We have organized this report into the following sections: • Audit Summary • Funding Cities in Minnesota • Governmental Funds Overview • Financial Trends and Analysis • Accounting and Auditing Updates We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, those charged with governance of the City, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process. 1d�'�`1� iOvt�d�a�Q�/ �q!'✓Iou�S�C,� 1SA��bQ.��e� { ����� June 24, 2009 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com AUDIT SUMMARY The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or audit committee of the City. UNDERSTANDING THE AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility, as stated in our engagement letter and as described by professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because an audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material misstatements may exist and not be detected by us. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit. PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008: • We have issued an unqualified opinion on the City's financial statements. • We noted no matters involving the City's internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. • The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. • We have reported no findings based on our testing of the City's compliance with Minnesota laws and regulations. Overall, we found the City's financial records to be in excellent condition. This not only provides for an efficient year -end audit, but should also provide confidence in the interim financial data used to manage the City throughout the year. 4- SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. The City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 45, "Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post - Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions," during the year ended December 31, 2008. This statement provides new guidance on accounting and financial reporting for "other post - employment benefits" (OPEB) accounted for in the financial statements of plan sponsors or employers. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. There are no significant transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements in a different period than when the transaction occurred. AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Professional standards define an audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the financial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. An audit adjustment may or may not indicate matters that could have a significant effect on the City's financial reporting process (that is, cause future financial statements to be materially misstated). During our audit procedures of the basic financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, we did not have any audit adjustments to report. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS Accounting estimates are an integral part of the basic financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were as follows: • Depreciation — Management's estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. • Net Other Post - Employment Benefit (OPEB) Liabilities — Actuarial estimates of the net OPEB obligation is based on eligible participants, estimated future health insurance premiums, and estimated retirement dates. Compensated absences — Estimate for compensated absences payable based on current sick leave balances. Management expects any differences between estimates and actual amounts of these estimates to be insignificant. We reviewed and tested management's procedures and underlying supporting documentation in the area discussed above. We concluded that the accounting estimates and management judgments appeared to consider all significant factors and resulted in appropriate accounting recognition. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 24, 2009. -2- DISAGREEMENTS ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. OTHER MATTERS We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. -3- FUNDING CITIES IN MINNESOTA LEGISLATION The following is a brief summary of recent legislative activity affecting the finances of Minnesota cities: Levy Limitations — The 2008 Legislature passed a law that will limit general operating property tax levy increases for Minnesota cities with populations over 2,500 to the lesser of 3.9 percent annually or the implicit price deflator for the next three years. Local Government Aid (LGA) and Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) — Due to the state's economic condition, Minnesota cities received "unallotment" notices reducing the payment of these state aids for the second half of 2008. These payments will again be reduced to cities for the 2009 and 2010 fiscal years. FEDERAL RECOVERY ACT The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is expected to provide approximately $300 billion in federal funds to state and local governments, and to institutions of higher education. These funds are intended to supplement existing federal programs, create new programs, or provide more broad fiscal relief. Many cities are hoping to receive some of these temporary funds for programs and projects. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 mandates that there be an unprecedented amount of oversight and transparency around the spending of these funds, including specific audit and internal control requirements. The additional internal control requirements include the need for controls over the acceptance of recovery funds, appropriate controls over the segregation of these funds from other sources of revenue, compliance with the additional laws and regulations specific to each grant award, and additional financial reporting requirements back to the appropriate federal agency. These additional controls also include considerations into whether control procedures are in place over the federal grant expenditures to prevent unallowable expenditures, consideration into whether additional controls and systems will be needed to ensure funds are able to be separately tracked and identified, and consideration into if controls are sufficient for any funds that are passed along to subrecipients. PROPERTY TAXES Our management report tracks the evolution of property tax reform in Minnesota, and explains its impact on cities and their property owners. Now, with very little change in property tax formulas, attention is turned toward our current real estate and housing environment, mortgage foreclosures, and the world economy. Property values within Minnesota cities experienced average increases of 11.0 percent for taxes payable in 2007 and 7.0 percent for those payable in 2008, reflecting the slowdown in growth in market values. In comparison, the City's market value increased by 10.4 percent in 2007 and 3.8 percent in 2008. It is important to remember that the 2008 market value is based on estimated values as of January 1, 2007, and the housing market is still experiencing difficult times. Ca The following graph shows the City's changes in taxable market value over the past 10 years: $11,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000 $9,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000 $7,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $5,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 Market Value 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state's property classification system to each property's market value. Each property classification has a different calculation and uses different rates. The graphs show that tax capacities have not increased at the same rate as market values, primarily due to property tax reform occurring over this period of time. The following graph shows the City's change in tax capacities over the past 10 years: $130,000,000 $120,000,000 $110,000,000 $100,000,000 $90,000,000 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 Tax Capacity 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 511 Although it is impossible to consider every aspect and variable of local government spending, average tax rates are often used as a benchmark. Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity All Cities Seven -County State -Wide Metro Area City of Edina 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 Average tax rate City 36.1 36.3 33.4 33.6 21.1 21.2 County 38.5 38.0 35.2 34.9 39.1 38.6 School 22.2 21.1 22.7 21.3 18.6 17.5 Special taxing 5.5 5.6 6.8 7.0 8.4 8.6 Total 102.3 101.0 98.1 96.8 87.2 85.9 The City's portion of the tax capacity rates for Edina residents was well below the state -wide and metro area averages the last two years. -6- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's governmental funds. Governmental funds include the General Fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, and capital project funds. We have also included the most recent comparative state -wide averages available from the State Auditor. The reader needs to consider the effect of inflation and other known changes or differences when comparing this data. Also, certain data on these tables may be classified differently than how they appear on the City's financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state -wide information, particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures. We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify unique or unusual trends and activities of your city. We intend for this type of comparative and trend information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the Management's Discussion and Analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based on estimates. GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUE The amounts received from the typical major sources of revenue will naturally vary between cities based on their particular situation. This would include the City's stage of development; location, size, and density of its population; property values; services it provides; and other attributes. The following table presents the City's revenue per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with state -wide averages: Year Population Property taxes Tax increments Franchise fees and other taxes Special assessments Licenses and permits Intergovernmental revenues Charges for services Other Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class State -Wide City of Edina December 31, 2006 December 31, 2007 2006 2007 2008 20,000 - 100,000 20,000 - 100,000 46,896 47,090 47,090 $ 336 $ 353 $ 435 $ 456 $ 472 52 56 154 166 182 29 35 11 12 14 76 73 37 37 52 42 37 74 62 62 159 169 59 79 64 74 82 57 58 66 106 113 60 67 56 Total revenue $ 874 $ 918 $ 887 $ 937 $ 968 The City has generated more property tax revenue for its governmental fund revenues compared to the average Minnesota city, while having a lower than average tax rate. The City continues to generate significantly more tax increment revenue per capita than average, as it has made extensive use of this tool to finance commercial development. However, because the City is a mature suburb, it generates less special assessment revenue (typically used for new development) and receives lower than average state aid revenue. The City's per capita governmental fund revenue for 2008 was $968, an increase of about 3.3 percent from the prior year. The increase is mostly due to property taxes and tax increments increasing $32 per capita. Special assessments also increased $15 per capita related to receipt of assessments on new street improvement projects in the City. -7- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS EXPENDITURES Similar to our discussion of revenues, the expenditures of governmental funds will vary from state -wide averages and from year -to -year, based on the City's circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows: • Current — These are typically the general operating -type expenditures occurring on an annual basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues. • Capital Outlay and Construction — These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more typically fluctuating significantly from year -to -year. Many of these expenditures are project- oriented which are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects. • Debt Service — Although the expenditures for the debt service may be relatively consistent over the term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt may be repaid with general property taxes. The City's expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with state -wide averages, are presented in the following table: Year Population Current General government Public safety Street maintenance and lighting Parks and recreation All other Capital outlay and construction Debt service Principal Interest and fiscal Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class State -Wide City of Edina December 31, 2006 December 31, 2007 2006 2007 2008 20,000 - 100,000 20,000 - 100,000 1 46,896 47,090 47,090 81 $ 83 $ 105 $ 139 $ 132 209 223 265 276 293 79 94 112 123 131 80 82 70 73 78 99 97 — — — 548 $ 579 $ 552 $ 611 $ 634 334 $ 328 $ 191 $ 255 $ 311 102 37 $ 100 $ 128 $ 131 $ 151 39 68 36 42 139 $ 139 $ 196 $ 167 $ 193 The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state -wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's current operating costs are higher than average for public safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full -time fire department. The City's per capita expenditures for capital are less than state -wide averages, but will vary on a yearly basis depending on current, ongoing capital projects. Debt service costs are higher than average, but are offset by higher than average tax increment revenue. -8- FINANCIAL TRENDS AND ANALYSIS GENERAL FUND The City's General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal operations, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and parks and recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last five years. We have also included an expenditure line to reflect the change in the size of the General Fund operation over the same period. $30,000,000 $27,500,000 $25,000,000 $22,500,000 $20,000,000 $17,500,000 $15,000,000 $12,500,000 $10,000,000 $7,500,000 $5,000,000 $2,500,000 General Fund Financial Position Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 � Fund Balance O Cash Balance (Net of Interfund Borrowing) Expenditures The City's General Fund cash and investments balance (net of interfund borrowing) at December 31, 2008 was $15,133,110, which decreased $537,144 from 2007. Total fund balance at December 31, 2008 was $14,379,003, up $272,146 from the prior year. Of this total fund balance, $13,686,167 was reserved or designated according to city fund balance policies. The remaining fund balance of $692,836 is undesignated. Over the last few years, the City has generally been able to maintain or increase cash and fund balance levels. This is an important factor because a government, like any organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. Generally, the amount of equity required typically increases as the size of the operation increases. A healthy financial position allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and can be a factor in determining the City's bond rating and resulting interest costs. -9- The following graph reflects the City's General Fund reliance on its revenue sources for 2008: Taxes Licenses/Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Other General Fund Revenue oo° oo° oo° oo° oo° oo° °o° oo° °o° �oI&, ❑ Actual ■ Budget Total General Fund revenues for 2008 were $28,236,278, which was $374,436 (1.3 percent) over the final budget. Property taxes were under budget by $258,109 mostly due to the reduction in MVHC by the state at the end of fiscal 2008 as discussed earlier. Charges for services exceeded budget by about $402,000 due to an increase in revenue related to the school district election, reimbursement for police wages for the Republican National Convention, and engineering fees exceeding budget projections due to new projects in 2008. License and permit revenues were over budget by $170,731 due to building permits being more than expected during 2008. Intergovernmental revenues were $80,049 over budget mostly in state grants which were more than expected. The following graph presents the City's General Fund revenue sources for the last five years. The graph reflects the City's increasing reliance on taxes to finance its General Fund operations. $22,500,000 $20,000,000 $17,500,000 $15,000,000 $12,500,000 $10,000,000 $7,500,000 $5,000,000 $2,500,000 General Fund Revenue by Source Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 ■ Taxes ■ Intergovernmental O Other Overall, General Fund revenues increased $519,190 (1.9 percent) from the previous year, primarily due to a $603,584 increase in tax revenue. Intergovernmental revenue decreased $105,791 mostly due to the decrease in federal funds related to the Community Development Block Grant received in the previous year. -10- The following illustrations provide you with the components of the City's General Fund spending for 2008 and for the past five years: General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks and Recreation General Fund Expenditures O Actual ■ Budget Total General Fund expenditures for 2008 were $28,353,757, which was $250,885 (0.9 percent) under the final budget. The largest variance was in general government, which was about $246,000 under budget, mainly due to several departments' expenditures being less than expected. The largest savings were in personal costs within the administration and employee program departments. $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 General Fund Expenditures by Function Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 ■ General Governmental O Public Safety ■ Public Works ■ Parks Overall, General Fund expenditures increased $973,118 (3.5 percent) from the prior year. Public safety increased about $739,000 mostly due to budgeted increases in personal costs, the purchase of a new computer system, and new vehicles for the police department. Public works increased about $288,000 primarily for street maintenance and seal coating projects incurred during 2008. There was also an increase in personnel services related to engineering and street maintenance. General government expenditures decreased about $214,000 mostly due to the significant severance payments made in the previous year. -11- UTILITIES FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Utilities Fund: $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Utilities Fund Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 O Operating Revenue Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Utilities Fund ended 2008 with net assets of $45,955,790, an increase of $3,333,725 from the prior year. Of this, $37,372,287 represents the investment in utility distribution system capital assets, leaving $8,583,503 of unrestricted net assets. Utilities Fund operating revenue was $13,544,728 for 2008, up $419,309 or 3.2 percent mostly due to an increase in rates during 2008 which was intended to help finance the replacement of aging infrastructure. Operating expenses, including interest expense, were $592,510 or 5.9 percent more than last year. Operating expenses increased about 3.5 percent while interest expense on outstanding debt increased about $250,000. As the graph above illustrates, operating income improved slightly each year from 2004 to 2007 but declined slightly in 2008. -12- LIQUOR FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Liquor Fund: $13,000,000 $12,000,000 $11,000,000 $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 Liquor Fund Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 O Sales � Cost of Sales � Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) The Liquor Fund ended 2008 with net assets of $2,676,195, a decrease of $204,424 from the prior year. Of the net asset balance, $1,239,571 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving $1,436,624 of unrestricted net assets. Liquor sales for 2008 were $12,121,791, about $685,000 (6.0 percent) more than last year. Sales have steadily increased over the last several years, increasing 20.9 percent since 2004. The Liquor Fund generated a gross profit of $3,181,776 in 2008, or 26.2 percent of gross sales. The Liquor Fund gross profit margin has been similar for the last several years, ranging from 25.8 percent to 26.4 percent between 2004 and 2008. Operating expenses for 2008 were $2,106,494, about $160,000 or 8.2 percent higher than last year. 392 AQUATIC CENTER FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Aquatic Center Fund: $1,000,000 $900,600 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Aquatic Center Fund Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 O Operating Revenue Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Aquatic Center Fund ended 2008 with net assets of $2,137,921, an increase of $137,725 from the prior year. Of the net asset balance, $978,878 represents investments in aquatic center capital assets, $204,557 of unrestricted net assets, and $954,486 restricted for debt service. Aquatic Center Fund operating revenues for 2008 were $925,388, about $61,000 (7.0 percent) greater than last year mostly due to an increase in rates and usage during 2008. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2008, were $786,558, an increase of $6,682 from the prior year. As the graph above illustrates, operating income has improved in each of the previous two years and has remained positive in each of the five years presented. -14- GOLF COURSE FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Golf Course Fund: $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $(500,000) Golf Course Fund Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 D Operating Revenue Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Golf Course Fund ended 2008 with net assets of $2,013,091, an increase of $252,607 from the prior year. Of this, $3,543,493 represents the investment in golf course land and capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($1,530,402) of unrestricted net assets. Golf Course Fund operating revenues for 2008 were $3,680,584, about $89,000 (2.5 percent) less than last year. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for 2008 were $3,608,143, down approximately $9,500 from the prior year. On an annual basis, this fund has had to borrow from other funds to fund cash flow needs. This interfund borrowing decreased $30,000 during 2008 to a total of $1,100,000 at December 31, 2008. Due to the cash flow losses over recent years, management has developed a plan to support operations of this fund by making a transfer from the Liquor Fund on an annual basis until the financial position improves. The transfer made during 2008 totaled $170,000. -15- ARENA FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Arena Fund: $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $(200,000) $(400,000) Arena Fund Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 O Operating Revenue Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Arena Fund ended 2008 with net assets of $2,194,631, a decrease of $195,661 from the prior year. Of this, $2,277,430 represents the investment in the arena capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($82,799) of unrestricted net assets. Arena Fund operating revenues for 2008 were $1,399,599, about $14,500 less than last year. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for 2008 were $1,698,014, an increase of about $145,000 from the prior year, which was mostly due to significant repairs at the ice arena that were completed during the year. As the graph above illustrates, operating income (loss) declined almost $185,000 in 2008. As can be seen in the above table, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from the Construction Fund (formally the Revolving Fund) and the Liquor Fund on an annual basis. These transfers totaled $105,000 in fiscal 2008. MRS ART CENTER FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Art Center Fund: $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $(100,000) $(200,000) $(300,000) Art Center Fund Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 O Operating Revenue Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) The Art Center Fund ended 2008 with net assets of $240,848, a decrease of $51,023 from the prior year. Of this, $261,110 represents the investment in capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($20,262) of unrestricted net assets. Art Center operating revenues for 2008 were $451,697, about $45,000 less than the prior year, which was mostly due to a decline in class registrations. Operating expenses for 2008 were $664,194, which increased about $27,000 from the prior year. As can be seen in the above table, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from the Liquor Fund on an annual basis. This transfer totaled $135,000 in fiscal 2008. 5 V EDINBOROUGH PARK AND CENTENNIAL LAKES FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Fund: $2,250,000 $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 $(250,000) $(500,000) Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Fund Year Ended December 31, 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 D Operating Revenue Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) The Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Fund ended 2008 with net assets of $4,659,522, a decrease of $90,466 from the prior year. Of this, $1,178,967 represents the investment in capital assets, leaving $3,480,555 of unrestricted net assets. Operating revenues in this fund increased $112,319 in 2008 and expenses increased $161,427. As can be seen in the above table, this fund has been operating at a net loss for the past several years. These losses have been financed through the use of fund equity. Although this fund has adequate fund equity to finance the operating losses, it is important to be aware of these financial results when considering long -range financial plans. -18- GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City's financial statements include fund -based information that focuses on budgetary compliance, and the sufficiency of the City's current assets to finance its current liabilities. The GASB Statement No. 34 reporting model also requires the inclusion of two government -wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City as a single, unified entity. These government -wide statements provide information on the total cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long -term liabilities. Statement of Net Assets The Statement of Net Assets essentially tells you what your city owns and owes at a given point in time, the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net assets represent the resources the City has leftover to use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, the Statement of Net Assets divides the net assets into three components: net assets invested in capital assets, net of related debt; restricted net assets; and unrestricted net assets. The following table presents the City's net assets as of December 31, 2008 for governmental activities and business -type activities: The City's total net assets at December 31, 2008 were $14,516,550 higher than at the beginning of the year. The amount invested in capital assets increased by $7,725,921. Unrestricted assets increased about $2,473,697 and restricted assets increased from the prior year by $4,316,932. -19- Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Total Net assets Current and other assets $ 54,476,230 $ 24,630,275 $ 79,106,505 Net book value of capital assets 108,049,357 65,348,867 173,398,224 Current liabilities (13,649,480) (5,766,746) (19,416,226) Long -term liabilities (44,334,972) (24,334,398) (68,669,370) Total net assets $ 104,541,135 $ 59,877,998 $ 164,419,133 Net assets Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 71,601,227 $ 46,851,736 $ 118,452,963 Restricted 3,362,446 954,486 4,316,932 Unrestricted 29,577,462 12,071,776 41,649,238 Total net assets $ 104,541,135 $ 59,877,998 $ 164,419,133 The City's total net assets at December 31, 2008 were $14,516,550 higher than at the beginning of the year. The amount invested in capital assets increased by $7,725,921. Unrestricted assets increased about $2,473,697 and restricted assets increased from the prior year by $4,316,932. -19- ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES GASB STATEMENT N0.45 — ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING BY EMPLOYERS FOR POST - EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS This statement provides new guidance on accounting and reporting for post - employment benefits other than pensions by employers when the plan is not accounted for in their financial statements. Other post - employment benefits (OPEB) refer to non- pension benefits provided after the termination of employment. One example of this type of benefit is healthcare premiums paid by employers on behalf of former employees. Governmental entities have traditionally accounted for OPEB on a pay -as- you -go basis, with only a few governments funding these benefits in advance of payment. The guidance in this statement rests on the assumption that OPEB liabilities should be accrued as they are earned by employees providing service to the entity. Under GASB Statement No. 45, governments offering OPEB will recognize the cost of these benefits using a three -step approach. The government will be required to project future benefits, discount those benefits to their present value, then use an acceptable actuarial method to allocate costs to individual accounting periods. Once calculated, the difference between the present value of OPEB benefits earned by employees as the result of past service and resources set aside to pay those benefits will be considered the "unfunded actuarial liability for OPEB." Every employer will be allowed to start fresh at the time of transition to the new standard. There will be no requirement for an employer to recognize an accounting liability for underfunding prior to the implementation of the new standard. Instead, the unfunded actuarial accrued liability for OPEB at transition would be amortized over 30 years. As long as an employer funds the full amount of the actuarially determined annual required contribution (ARC) for these benefits each year, no asset or liability will be reported on the Statement of Net Assets. However, an employer will need to report a "net pension obligation' on its Statement of Net Assets as an asset or liability if it contributes more or less, respectively, than the ARC each year. Nothing in the statement is intended to alter the normal application of modified accrual accounting in the governmental funds of the entity. Thus, in governmental funds, OPEB expenditures normally would be recognized when the benefits are due and payable rather than when benefits are earned. The guidance will require that actuarial valuations for OPEB occur at least every two years for plans with 200 or more members, and every 3 years for plans with fewer than 200 members. A sole employer plan with fewer than 100 plan members has the option to apply a simplified alternative measurement method rather than obtain actuarial valuations. The statement became effective in three phases based on the same criteria as those defined for the implementation of GASB Statement No. 34. GASB Statement No. 45 was phased in for cities over a three -year period, which started with category one cities in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. The City implemented this statement in fiscal 2008. GASB STATEMENT N0.47 — ACCOUNTING FOR TERMINATION BENEFITS GASB Statement No. 47 provides accounting and reporting guidance for state and local governments that offer benefits such as early retirement incentives or severance to employees that are involuntarily terminated. The statement requires that similar forms of termination benefits be accounted for in the same manner and is intended to enhance both the consistency of reporting for termination benefits and the comparability of financial statements. GASB Statement No. 47 is effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2005, or may be implemented simultaneously with GASB Statement No. 45, depending on your circumstances. -20- GASB STATEMENT N0.50 — PENSION DISCLOSURES — AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NOS. 25 AND 27 This statement expands the disclosure requirements for pension plans, similar to those requirements in GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 45. This will require additional discussion on funding status, use of assumptions, and the determination of contribution rates. This statement is effective for cities for the year ended December 31, 2008. GASB STATEMENT N0.51— ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR INTANGIBLE ASSETS Governments possess many different types of assets that may be considered intangible assets, including easements, water rights, timber rights, patents, trademarks, and computer software. This statement requires that all intangible assets not specifically excluded by its scope provisions be classified as capital assets. The requirements in this statement improve financial reporting by reducing inconsistencies that have developed in accounting and financial reporting for intangible assets. These inconsistencies will be reduced through the clarification that intangible assets subject to the provisions of this statement should be classified as capital assets, and through the establishment of new authoritative guidance that addresses issues specific to these intangible assets given their nature. The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2009. GASB STATEMENT N0.53 - ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS The guidance in this statement improves financial reporting by requiring governments to measure derivative instruments at fair value in their economic resources measurement focus financial statements. These improvements should allow users of those financial statements to more fully understand a government's resources available to provide services. The disclosures provide a summary of the government's derivative instrument activity and the information necessary to assess the government's objectives for derivative instruments, their significant terms, and the risks associated with the derivative instruments. The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2009. GASB STATEMENT N0.54 - FUND BALANCE REPORTING AND GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPE DEFINITIONS The objective of this statement is to enhance the usefulness of fund balance information by providing clearer fund balance classifications that can be more consistently applied and by clarifying the existing governmental fund type definitions. This statement establishes fund balance classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which a government is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources reported in governmental funds. The definitions of the general fund, special revenue fund type, capital projects fund type, debt service fund type, and permanent fund type are clarified by the provisions in this statement. The requirements are also intended to enhance the consistency between information reported in the government -wide statements and information in the governmental fund financial statements and avoid confusion about the relationship between reserved fund balance and restricted net assets. The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2010. -21- Our mission is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound _\ public infrastructure, offer premiere public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of the lands within the City, all in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 Prepared by: Department of Finance John Wallin — Treasurer and Finance Director Eric Roggeman .- Assistant Finance Director Paula Nelson — Accountant CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal 1 GFOA Certificate of Achievement 4 , . Organization 5 Organization Chart 6 II. FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors' Report 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis 9 Basic Financial Statements: Government -wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Assets .21 Statement of Activities 22 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 25' Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund. Balances - Governmental Funds .26 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 27 Statement of Net Assets - Proprietary Funds 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets - Proprietary Funds 29 Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 30 Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets - Fiduciary Funds 32 Notes to the Financial Statements 33 Required Supplementary Information: Budgetary Comparison Information: Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund 63 Other Post- Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress 69 Notes to Required Supplementary Information 71 =` . . CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Combining and Individual Non Major Fund Financial Statements and Schedules: Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 74 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 75 Special Revenue Fund - Community Development Block Grant Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual 76 Combining Statement of Net Assets - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 78 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 79 Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 80 Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds 83 Supplementary Financial Information: Tax Capacity, Tax Levies and Tax Capacity Rates 85 Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness 86 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 50th & France - #1200 88 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District - #1201 89 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Grandview Area Redevelopment District - #1202 90 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District - #1203 91 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 70th Street and Cahill Road District - #1207 92 III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) Financial Trends: Net Assets by Component 94 Changes in Net Assets 95 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 96 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 98 . Revenue Capacity: Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property 100 Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates 101 Principal Property Tax Payers 102 Property Tax Levies and Collections 103 Debt Capacity: Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 104 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 105 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 106 Legal Debt Margin Information 107 Pledged Revenue Coverage 108 Demographic and Economic Information: Demographic and Economic Statistics 109 . Principal Employers 110 Operating Information: Full -Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 111 Operating Indicators by Function 112 Capital Asset Statistics by Function r 113 do " Ad 1. i Introductory Section t10 % 1)1 01. Y June 24, 2009 l., Z' 01 -A-11I1, To the Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Citizens of the City of Edina (City): Minnesota statutes .require that every city publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published 'to fulfill that requirement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness 'and reliability of all of the information presented in this report, based upon a comprehensive' framework of internal control that it has established for. this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed: anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co. P.A., a firm of licensed certified public accountants, has issued an unqualified ( "clean ") opinion on the City's financial statements for the year .ended December 31, 2008. The independent auditor's report is located at the front of the financial section of this report. Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD &A) immediately follows the independent auditor's report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. MD &A complement this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it. Profile of the City The City, incorporated in 1888, is a fully developed first -ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 47,090. Currently, 98% of the City is developed with 55.5% of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1% to roadways and 11.8% supporting the park'and' open spaces. The remainder of:the land is used for commercial, industrial and public /semi-,public uses. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal property located within its boundaries. The City has operated under the Council- Manager form of government since 1955. Policy- making and, legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor:and four other members, all elected on a non- partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees; and hiring the City °Manager: The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the lCouncil, for overseeing the day -to -day operations of the city government, and for appointing the heads of the various departments. Council members serve four -year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor also serves a four -year term. The Council and Mayorar�e elected at large. The City provides a. full range of services, including police and fire protection; the construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure;, water and sewer services and recreational and cultural activities.and events. The Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City's financial planning and. control. The budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g., public safety), and department (e:g. police). Department heads may use resources within. a department as they see fit. The City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between departments.' . City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4$01 WEST 50TI I STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESCI \, 55424 -1394 bvwwcltyofedina.00111 14Y.952-826-0379 Local economy The City currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued stability. The region, while noted for a strong retail sector, enjoyed considerable re- development in recent years. The re- development consisted of varied manufacturing, medical and high -tech base that adds to the relative stability of the unemployment rate. Major industries with headquarters or divisions within the government's boundaries or in close proximity include medical services, retail operations and banking services. Edina is home to over 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the coming years. The City has become known for its quality residential housing stock and attractive neighborhoods. To date, approximately 98% of the housing stock is in place. Although the emphasis has changed over the years from exclusively single family housing to a more balanced mix of housing types, the City's concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority. The City enjoys a AAA bond rating and a Aaa bond rating from Standard and Poors and Moody's, respectively. Long -term financial planning The Metropolitan Council requires all cities in the seven - county metropolitan area to have a Comprehensive Plan and State law requires cities to update their plans every 10 years. The Comprehensive Plan guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur due to various social and market forces. The City updated our Comprehensive Plan and submitted it to the Metropolitan Council for review in 2008. A final version is expected to be adopted by the City Council in 2009. The City continues to focus on quality of life improvements throughout Edina. These efforts cover a broad array of areas including protecting and improving the environment, revitalization of parks and public areas, expanding recreational opportunities, expanding City services, and increasing communication between City representatives and the public. The City is working closely with state government, federal government and neighboring communities to improve the area's state and county transportation network, which includes upgraded highways and well - placed pathways. Funding for most of the transportation improvements will need to come from state, county and federal sources, with some minor portion supported by the local taxpayers. Relevant financial policies The City recently adopted a set of financial management policies that focus on long -term financial planning. Policies cover areas such as cash and investments, the operating budget, revenue, fund balance, capital outlay, and debt management. Designations for park dedication, investments, equipment replacement, compensated absences, and cash flow are all within the ranges specified in the policies. In addition, the City has $692,836 unreserved, undesignated fund balance in the general fund. Major initiatives The City is continually working to update our aging infrastructure. Our annually adopted five -year Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects. 2 Awards and Acknowledgements The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of. Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to. the City of Edina for its comprehensive annual financial" report for the fiscal year ended December 31-2007: This was the second consecutive year that the government has achieved this. prestigious award. In order to be awarded 'a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid.- for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial. report continues to meet the Certificate of, Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. >" The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the Finance Department staff. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the City's finances. Respectfully submitted, � ✓tit.- �"�-- John Wallin Finance Director Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director 3 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Edina Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. 1 E 0ff¢ • �Caf ST F9,r UNttCf & pfAIFS `a?AT President ca� a�aia� s x SEIlL 00 �o NC %0 Executive Director CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORGANIZATION December 31, 2008 Mayor: James Hovland Council Members: Joni Bennett Scot Housh Mary Brindle Ann Swenson City Manager: Gordon Hughes Finance Director/Treasurer: John Wallin City . Clerk: Debra Mangen 5 Term Expires December 31, 2012 December 31, 2010 December 31, 2010 December 31-2,012 December 31, 2012 Appointed Appointed Appointed Administration I I Assessing City Clerk Elections Human Resources Human Services Communications Technology Liquor Health Recycling City of Edina Citizens Boards and City Council City Attorney Commissions City Manager HRA Personnel Public Works Water and Sewer Street Maintenance Engineering Planning Parks and Building Recreation Inspections Recreational Facilities Recreational Programs Park Maintenance Finance I I Public Safety Police Civil Defense Animal Control Police Operations Fire I Prevention and Control EMS Special Operations Financial Section MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC A C C O U N T A N T S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the City Council and Residents City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Kenneth W. Malloy, CPA Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City at December 31, 2008, as well as the respective changes in financial position and cash flows thereof, where applicable, for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As described in Note 8 of the notes to basic financial statements, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45, "Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post- Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions," during the year ended December 31, 2008. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 24, 2009 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of this report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. (continued) Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, .Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952- 545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com The Management's Discussion and Analysis and required supplementary information, as listed in the table of contents, are not required parts of the basic financial statements, but are supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules, supplementary financial information, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. IA4qno4, lviowf�ve., /cc.rr+�wSi�.� I�Q�osQ,,/,'�!� f Cti, /� i June 24, 2009 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS As management of the City of Edina (the City) we offer readers of the City's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which precedes this report. Financial Hiahliahts • The assets of the City exceeded its liabilities at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $164,419,133 (net assets). Of this amount, $41,649,238 (unrestricted net assets) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City's fund designations and fiscal policies. • The City's total net assets increased by $14,516,550. $5,526,288 of this increase is due to the City's use of tax increment revenues to pay down tax increment debt. • As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $42,067,899, an increase of $719,859 in comparison with the prior year. Of this total amount, $33,585,999, or 80 %, is available for spending at the City's discretion (unreserved fund balance). • At the end of the current fiscal year, unreserved fund balance for the general fund was $14,365,021, or 51% of total general fund expenditures. • The City's total bonded debt increased by $12,320,000 during the current fiscal year, from $63,975,000 to $76,295,000. The City issued new debt during the year consisting of $7,755,000 permanent improvement revolving bonds . to finance special assessment projects, and $13,985,000 of utility revenue bonds to pay for infrastructure improvements. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City's basic financial statements. The City's basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial_ statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government -wide financial statements. The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City's finances, in a manner similar to a private- sector business. The statement of net assets presents information on all of the City's assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net assets. Over time, increases or decreases in net assets may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) The statement of activities presents information showing how the City's net assets changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net assets are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave). Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, public works and parks. The business -type activities of the City include utilities, liquor, aquatic center, golf course and community activity centers. Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near -term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near -term financial requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statement. By doing so, readers may better understand the long -term impact of the City's near term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains 4 individual major governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund, debt service fund and the construction fund. Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non -major governmental funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for its general fund and one of its special revenue funds. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for those funds to demonstrate compliance with these budgets. Proprietary funds. The City maintains four major enterprise funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in the governmental - wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its utility, liquor, aquatic center and golf course operations. 10 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Data from the other proprietary funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non -major propriety y,funds are provided in the form of combining statements. elsewhere. in this report. Proprietary funds provide the some type of information as the government -wide financial statements, only in more detail. Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for "resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not .reflected in the government -wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are „not available to support the City's own programs. The accounting used, for fiduciary funds, is much like that used for proprietary funds. Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in.the government —wide and fund financial statements. Other information. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non -major governmental and enterprise funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information on budgetary comparisons. Government -wide Financial Analysis As noted earlier, net assets may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. In the case of the City, assets exceeded liabilities by $164,419,133 at the close of the most recent fiscal year. The largest portion of the City's. net assets ($118,452,963 or 72 %) reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g. land; buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these, capital assets to. provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. 11 rt: Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) City of Edina's Net Assets Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Totals 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 Current and other assets $ 54,476,230 $ 50,350,983 $ 24,630,275 $ 16,432,230 $ 79,106,505 $ 66,783,213 Capital assets 108,049,357 99,739,977 65,348,867 57,854,580 173,398,224 157,594,557 Total assets $ 162,525,587 $ 150,090,960 $ 89,979,142 $ 74,286,810 $ 252,504,729 $ 224,377,770 Long -term liabilities outstanding $ 44,334,972 $ 43,845,870 $ 24,334,398 $ 13,071,516 $ 68,669,370 $ 56,917,386 Other liabilities 13,649,480 13,038,022 5,766,746 4,519,779 19,416,226 17,557,801 Total liabilities $ 57,984,452 $ 56,883,892 $ 30,101,144 $ 17,591,295 $ 88,085,596 $ 74,475,187 Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 71,601,227 $ 67,680,882 $ 46,851,736 $ 43,046,160 $ 118,452,963 $ 110,727,042 Restricted 3,362,446 - 954,486 - 4,316,932 - Unrestricted 29,577,462 25,526,186 12,071,776 13,649,355 41,649,238 39,175,541 Total net assets $ 104,541,135 $ 93,207,068 $ 59,877,998 $ 56,695,515 $ 164,419,133 $ 149,902,583 An additional portion of the City's net assets ($4,316,932) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net assets ($41,649,238) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories of net assets reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year. There was also an increase of $2,473,697 in unrestricted net assets, largely due to the large number and scope of special assessment project work undertaken and levied for during the year. 12 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) As shown below, the City's net assets increased by $14,516,550 during the current fiscal year. Factors contributing to this change'are discussed in the next two sections. City of Edina's Changes in Net Assets Governmental Activities: Business -type Activities Totals 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services $ 7,442,883 $ 7,153,630 $ 33,959,038 $ 32,578,430 $ 41,401,921 $ 39,732,060 Operating grants and contributions 1,170,183 1,405,669 147,456 127,492 1,317,639 1,533,161 Capital grants and contributions 7,710,015 4,299,509 -. 7,710,015 4,299,509 General revenues: Property taxes 22,242,276 21,459,001 - 22,242,276 21,459,001 Other taxes 9,225,900 8,364,448 - - 9,225,900 8,364,448 Gain on disposal of assets 1,265 58,377 14,505 7,604 15,770 65,981 Unrestricted investment earnings 1,185,899 1,588,695 607,312 510,678 1,793,211 2,099,373 Total revenues 48,978,421 44,329,329 34,728,311 33,224,204 83,706,732 77,553,533 Expenses: . General government 6,836,248 7,039,298 6,836,248 7,039,298 Public safety 14,833,647 13,743,194 14,833,647 13,743,194 Public works 9,046,873 8,757,022 9,046,873 8,757,022 .Parks 5,971,565 5,025,560 - 5,971,565 5,025,560 Interest on long -term debt 1,923,821 1,887,633 - - 1,923,821 1,887,633 Utilities - 10,625,811 10,036,844 10,625,811 10,036,844 Liquor 11,049,223 10,361,998 11,049,223 10,361,998_ Aquatic center 787,663 780,981 787,663 780,981 Golf course - 3,612,482 3,621,977 3,612,482 3,621,977 Community activity centers - 4,502,849 4,168,534 4,502,849 4,168,534 Total expenses 38,612,154 36,452,707 30,578,028 28,970,334 69,190,182 65,423,041 Increase in net assets before transfers 10,366,267 7,876,622 4,150,283 4,253.870 14,516,550 12,130,492 Transfers 967,800 919,625 (967,800) (919,625) - Increase in net assets 11,334,067 8,796,247 3,182,483 3,334,245 14,516,550 12,130,492 Net assets - .January 1 93,207,068 84,410,821 56,695,515 53,361,270 149,902,583 137,772,091 Net assets - December 31 $ 104,541,135 . $ 93,207,068 $ 59,877,998 $ 56,695,515 $ 164,419,133 $ 149,902,583 13 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Governmental Activities Governmental activities increased the City's net assets by $11,334,067, accounting for 78% of the total growth in net assets. Key elements of this increase are as follows: • Property tax revenues increased by $783,275 (3.7 %) during the year, which is less than the property tax levy increase of 5% outlined in our 2008 budget due to the Governor's action to unallot the second half Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) payment. • The City also collected $8,578,434 in tax increments, which were used to pay principal and interest on tax increment debt. This increases net assets because debt principal payments are not expensed on the Statement of Activities. Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and expenses: Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities Other Charges for services 0 ° 15% Expenses and Program Revenues - Governmental Activities Millions 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 General Public safetyPublic works Parks Interest on government long -term debt 14 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Business -type Activities Business -type activities increased net assets by $3,182,483 accounting for 22% of the City's growth in net assets. Key elements of the current year increase are as follows: Charges for services for business -type activities increased 4.2% from 2007. The Utilities fund charges for services increased $587,476 (4.5 %) from the previous year due to increased rates. The City commissioned a utility rate study for the 2008 year that called for significant rate increases to pay for current and future infrastructure needs. Business -type activities made net transfers of $967,800 to governmental activities during 2008 to provide cash flow for operational and capital improvement needs. Revenues by Source - Business -type Activities Charges for services 97.8% 15 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Financial Analvsis of the Citv's Funds As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance - related legal requirements. Governmental Funds. The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near - term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unreserved fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $42,067,899, an increase of $719,859 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately 80% of this total amount ($33,585,999) constitutes unreserved fund balance. The remainder of the fund balance is reserved because it has already been committed 1) to provide for prepaid items ($13,982), 2) to pay committed contracts ($3,400,955), 3) for special projects ($182,207), 4) for construction projects ($1,216,132) or 5) to pay debt service ($3,668,624). The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unreserved fund balance of the general fund was $14,365,021. As a measure of the general fund's liquidity, unreserved fund balance represents 51 % of total general fund expenditures. The fund balance of the City's general fund increased by $272,146 during the current fiscal year. Key factors in this growth are as follows: General fund property tax revenues increased by 3.1% in the current fiscal year despite a levy increase of 4.6 %. The shortfall is due to the Governor's action to unallot the second half Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) payment. Total general fund expenditures increased 3.6% in the current fiscal year. Current expenditures increased in three of the four functional areas (safety, public works, and parks). General government current expenditures decreased by 5.3% due to a decrease in spending for the comprehensive plan, contingency expenditures, and employee retirements. Other than the decreases in contingency expenditures and employee retirements, expenditures were very close to the increase planned for in our 2008 budget, which projected an expenditure increase of 5.2 %. The liquor fund transferred $742,800 of profits to the general fund. The general fund made transfers totaling $450,000 to the construction fund to finance our Capital Improvement Program, as stipulated in the fund balance section of our financial management policies. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund balance decreased by $525,244 in the current fiscal year because the City is using accumulated tax increment funds to pay for the promenade project. The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $3,668,624, all of which is reserved for the payment of debt service. The net increase in fund balance during the current year in the debt service fund was $778,083. Fund balance increased during the year due to the deposit of capitalized interest from bonds issued during the year into the debt service fund for the purpose of making interest payments shortly after year -end. The construction fund balance decreased by $65,437 in 2008 due to decreases in investment income and the transfer from the general fund. A significant portion of the fund balance in the construction fund represents unspent bond proceeds that will be spent on construction projects that will continue into 2009. 16 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Proprietary funds. The City's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Unrestricted net assets of the utility fund at the end of the year amounted to $8,583,503. The total growth in net assets was $3,333,725. Operating revenues and expenses in the utilities fund increased by 3.2% and 3.5 %, respectively, in 2008, due to rate increases that are intended to help replace aging infrastructure. The City invested $9,518,872 in utility fund capital assets during 2008. Unrestricted net assets of the liquor fund at the end of the year amounted to $1,436,624. Total net assets decreased by $204,424. The liquor fund continues to transfer profits back into other City funds, including the general, construction, golf course, arena and art center funds. The liquor fund made transfers totaling $1,277,800 to other funds during 2008. The majority of this amount ($742,800) was transferred to the general fund according to the budget. Unrestricted net assets of the aquatic center fund at the end of the year amounted to $204,557. Aquatic center revenues increased slightly from 2007 due to increased rates. The aquatic center remains profitable. Unrestricted net assets of the golf course fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($1,530,402), a decrease of $2,110 from the prior year. Unrestricted net assets have been declining for a number of years in the golf course fund because cash flow is not sufficient to make principal and interest payments on outstanding debt. The golf course made the final payment on some of its debt on January 1, 2009, and refinanced the remaining debt on April 29, 2009, so debt service will be less of a burden in upcoming years. General Fund Budgetary Highlights During the year there was a $400,000 increase in appropriations between the original and final amended budget. The main component of the increase was a transfer to the construction fund of unreserved and undesignated general fund balance according to the City's fund balance policy. During the year, revenues exceeded budgetary estimates, and since increased revenues were greater than expenditures, there was no need to draw upon existing fund balance. Major variances from budget include property tax revenues that were under budget by $261,585 due to action by the Governor to unallot the second half payment for the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) program. The City exceeded budgeted revenues in several categories, mostly due to increases in demand for City services, some of which we receive revenue for. There were no major variances from budgeted expenditures, although there were many smaller variances mostly due to the erratic nature of spending for the replacement of the City's equipment. The employee programs department was $78,587 under budget due to a low number of severance payments for employees who retired after long tenures with the City. Capital Asset and Debt Administration Capital assets. The City's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business type activities as of December 31, 2008, amounted to $173,398,224 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land, land improvements, buildings, vehicles and equipment. The total increase in the City's investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year was 10 percent (an 8 percent increase for governmental activities and a 13 percent increase for business - type activities). 17 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following: The City continued reconstruction of Fire Station #1 on Tracy Avenue; construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year has reached $5,422,305. A variety of street construction, sidewalk and traffic signal projects began in 2008, including the country club neighborhood project; construction in progress as of the close of the year reached $6,725,036. A variety of utility infrastructure improvements, including watermain, sanitary and storm sewer, including the country club neighborhood project; construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $9,765,174. City of Edina's Capital Assets (Net of Depreciation) Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 4. Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long -term debt outstanding of $76,295,000, an increase of $12,320,000 from 2007. The key factor in this increase was the issuance of $13,985,000 of General Obligation Revenue bonds, and $7,755,000 of General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) bonds. $10,420,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and special assessments. This amount decreased from 2007 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. $14,770,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City's special assessment program. This amount increased from 2007 due to a new issue during 2008. An additional $10,015,000 of general obligation tax increment debt financed the City's economic development program. This amount decreased in 2008 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. Also outstanding is $14,675,000 public project revenue bonds which financed the City Hall and Police facility as well as two gymnasiums. This amount decreased in 2008 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. There is a total of $26,415,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. 18 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Totals 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 Land and land improvements $ 26,109,904 $ 26,795,278 $ 4,832,171 $ 5,131,094 $ 30,942,075 $ 31,926,372 Buildings and improvements 35,576,980 29,542,652 6,486,370 6,815,285 42,063,350 36,357,937 Machinery and equipment 8,003,483 8,438,435 2,098,994 2,293,057 10,102,477 10,731,492 Infrastructure 24,946,400 19,582,847 41,962,368 39,035,017 66,908,768 58,617,864 Construction in progress 13,412,590 15,380,765 9,968,964 4,580,127 23,381,554 19,960,892 Total $ 108,049,357 $ 99,739,977 $ 65,348,867 $ 57,854,580 $ 173,398,224 $ 157,594,557 Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 4. Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long -term debt outstanding of $76,295,000, an increase of $12,320,000 from 2007. The key factor in this increase was the issuance of $13,985,000 of General Obligation Revenue bonds, and $7,755,000 of General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) bonds. $10,420,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and special assessments. This amount decreased from 2007 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. $14,770,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City's special assessment program. This amount increased from 2007 due to a new issue during 2008. An additional $10,015,000 of general obligation tax increment debt financed the City's economic development program. This amount decreased in 2008 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. Also outstanding is $14,675,000 public project revenue bonds which financed the City Hall and Police facility as well as two gymnasiums. This amount decreased in 2008 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. There is a total of $26,415,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. 18 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) City of Edina's Outstanding Debt The City maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor's. State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to 3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $302,384,967. Only $25,095,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation. Additional information on the City's long -term debt can be found in Note 5. Economic Factors and Next Year's Budget The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in Edina for February 2009 was 6 %, well below the state and national levels. The City is home to Southdale Center, the nation's first fully enclosed climate - controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview Southdale hospital, as well as several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently selected as one of the best in the country. Ninety -seven percent of seniors go to college and eighty - six percent finish in five years. Property values in Edina have been increasing at a rapid pace for several years, although the rapid growth appears to be ending. Estimated market value of all real estate increased 1.3% for taxes payable in 2009 after a 3.8% increase the year before. Market Value and Tax Capacity -0 Tax Capacity Annual Changes -�- Market Value 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% - 10.0% -15.0% -20.0% - 25.0% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 19 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Totals 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 Tax increment bonds $ 10,015,000 $ 15,665,000 $ $ $ 10,015,000 $ 15,665,000 General obligation bonds 10,420,000 10,990,000 10,420,000 10,990,000 Public improvement bonds 14,770,000 7,170,000 14,770,000 7,170,000 Public project revenue bonds 14,675,000 15,390,000 14,675,000 15,390,000 Revenue bonds 26,415,000 14,760,000 26,415,000 14,760,000 Total $ 49,880,000 $ 49,215,000 $ 26,415,000 $ 14,760,000 $ 76,295,000 $ 63,975,000 The City maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor's. State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to 3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $302,384,967. Only $25,095,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation. Additional information on the City's long -term debt can be found in Note 5. Economic Factors and Next Year's Budget The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in Edina for February 2009 was 6 %, well below the state and national levels. The City is home to Southdale Center, the nation's first fully enclosed climate - controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview Southdale hospital, as well as several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently selected as one of the best in the country. Ninety -seven percent of seniors go to college and eighty - six percent finish in five years. Property values in Edina have been increasing at a rapid pace for several years, although the rapid growth appears to be ending. Estimated market value of all real estate increased 1.3% for taxes payable in 2009 after a 3.8% increase the year before. Market Value and Tax Capacity -0 Tax Capacity Annual Changes -�- Market Value 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% - 10.0% -15.0% -20.0% - 25.0% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 19 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) The City collects property taxes based on tax capacity, which roughly equals estimated market value multiplied by class rates for different types of parcels (commercial, residential, etc.). Class rates are set by state statute. Tax capacity for real estate increased 2% for taxes payable in 2009, and has been increasing steadily ever since the state revised property tax law in 2001 for taxes payable in 2002. Due to the recent increases in market value and tax capacity, property tax rates had been decreasing through 2007, although tax rates now appear to be rising slightly. All of these factors above were considered in preparing the City's budget for the 2009 fiscal year. The City's adopted 2009 budget includes a property tax levy of $21,202,691 for the general fund, an increase of 4.4% from the 2008 general fund levy. Requests for Information This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Office of the Finance Director, 4801 West 501h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report can also be found on the internet at www.cityofedina.com. 20 Basic Financial Statements CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS December 31; 2008 Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Investments Restricted investments Accrued interest Accounts receivable, net Special assessments receivable Internal balances Due from other governments Prepaid items Inventory Total current assets Noncurrent assets: Deferred charges Nondepreciable capital assets Depreciable capital assets (net) Total noncurrent assets Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Accrued interest payable Contracts payable Due to other governments Deposits payable Unearned revenue Net OPEB obligation Compensated absences payable Bonds payable Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities: Compensated absences payable Bonds payable, net of unamortized discount Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Net assets: - - lrnested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted for debt service Unrestricted Total net assets Primary Government Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total $ 44,269 39,973,541 4,617,087 177,973 477,069 `8;334,720 (185,000) 757,166 13,982 54,210,807 265,423 30,846,419 77,202,938 108,314,780 162,525,587 2,543,920 756,292 751;478 416,641 19,394 67,051 4,890 270,330 1,404,484 7,415,000 13,649,480 2,106,726 42,228,246 44,334,972 57,984;452 71,601,227 3,362,446 29,577,462 $ 104,541,135 $ 1,150,174 9,597,642 8,1'16,762 99,421 3,585,854 241,307 185,000 5,956 344,406 1,185,938 24,512,460 117,815 11,057,929 54,290,938 65,466,682 89,979,142 1,245,019 214,467 386,247 173,759 161,528 123,421 103,128 37,174 417,003 2,905,000 5,766,746 625,505 23,708,893 24,334,398 30,101,144 46,851,736 954,486 12;071,776 $ 59,877,998 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 21 $ 1,194,443 49,571,183 12,733,849 277,394 4,062,923 8,576,027 763,122 . 358,388 1,185,938 78,723,267 383,238 41, 904, 348 131,493, 876 173,781,462 252,504,729 3,788,939 970,759 1,137,725 590,400 180,922 190,472 108,018 307,504 1,821,487 10,320,000 19,416,226 2,732,231 65,937,139 68,669,370 88,085,596 118,452,963 4,316,932 41,649,238 $ 164,419,133 Functions /Programs Primary, government:. Governmental activities: _ General government Public safety Public works Parks Interest on long -term debt Total government activities Business -type activities: Utilities Liquor Aquatic center Golf"course Community activity centers Total business -type activities Total primary government The accompanying notes are an integral part.of these financial statements. 22 Program Revenues s. Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants 'and Expenses Services Contributions Contributions , $ 61836,248 $ 840,070 $ 188,131 $ - 14,833,647 5,839,683 778,831 - 9,046,873 385;439 195,000 7,710,015 5,971,565 377,691 8,221 - 1,923,821 - - - 38,612,154 7,442,883 1,170,183 7,710,015 xw _ 10,625,811 13,713,249 120,982 - 11,049,223 12,122,599 - - 787,663- 925,388 - - 3,612,482 3,680,584 - - ,502,849 3,517;218 26,474 - :: 30,578,028 33,959,038 147,456 - $ 69,190,182 $ 41,401,921 $ 1,317,639 $ . 7,710,015 The accompanying notes are an integral part.of these financial statements. 22 23 Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Assets Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total. $ (5,808,047) $ - $ {5,808,047) (8,215,133) - (8,215,133) (756,419) - (756,419) (5,585,653) - (5,585,653) ` (1,923,821) - (1,923,821) (22,289,073) - (22,289273) - 3,208,420 3,208,420 - 1,073,376 1,073,376 - 137,725 137,725 - 68,102 68,102 - (959,157) (959157) - 3,528,466 3,528,466 (22,289,073) 3,528,466 (18,760;607) General revenues: Property taxes 22,242;276 - 22,242,276 Tax increment collections 8,578,434 - 81578,434 Franchise taxes 647,466 - 647,466 Unrestricted investment earnings 1,185,899 607,312 1,793,211 Gain on disposal of capital assets 1,265 14,505 15,7.70 Transfers. 967,800 (967,800): - Total general revenues and transfers 33,623,1.40 (345,983) 33,277,157 Change in net assets 11,334,067 3,182,483 14,516,550 Net assets - beginning 93,207,068 56,695,515 149,902,583 Net assets - ending $ 104,541,135 $ 59;877,998 $ 164,419,133 23 This page left blank intentionally. 24 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA' BALANCE SHEET GOVERNMENTALFUNDS December 31, 2008 Housing & Nonmajor Total Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds Assets " Cash and cash equivalents $ 957 $ 15,096 $ 9,613 $ •4,647 $ 13,956 $ � 44,269 Investments - unrestricted 15,351,060 14,294,122 3,253,353 6,377,606 697,400 39,973;541 " Investments - restricted - - - 4,617,087 - 4,617;087 Accrued interest 74,435 52,139 4 46,818•"" 4,577 17.7;973 Accounts receivable 291,834 - - 4;381 180,854 477,069 Special assessments receivable - - 6,077,483 2,257,237 - 8,334,720 Due from other funds - 18,907 387,000 - 575,000 980,907 Due from other, governments 583,541 28,989 22,654 77,787. 44,195 757,166 Prepaid items 13,982 - - - - ' "13,982 Total assets 16,315,809 14,409,253 9,750,107 $ 13,385,563 $ 1,515,982 55,376,7.14 Liabilities and fund balances Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 916,138 $ 856,649 $ 4,000 $„ 715,769 $ 51,364 $ 2,543;920 . Salaries payable; 743,172 - - 3,257 9,863 756,292 Contracts payable - - - 41 "6,641 - 41.6,641 Due to other funds 218,907 - - 910,000 37,000 1,165,907 Due to other governments 4,463 14,931 - - - 19,394 Deposits payable 54,126 - - 12,925 - 67,051 Unearned revenue - - - - 4,890 4,890 Deferred revenue - - 6,077,483 2,257,237 - 8,334,720 Total liabilities 1,936,806 871,580 6,081,483 4,315,829 103,117 13,308,815 Fund balance: Reserved for: .Prepaid items 13,982 - - - - 13,982 . Encumbrances - - - 3,400,955 - 3,400,955 Special projects - - 182,207 - 182,207 Construction projects - - - 1,216,132 - 1,216,132 Debt service - - 3,668,624 - - 3,668,624 Unreserved: Designated, reported in: General Fund 13,672,185 - - - - 13,672,185 Capital Project Funds - - - 4,270,440 - 4;270,440. Undesignated, reported in: General Fund 692,836 - - - - 692,836 Special Revenue Funds - 13,537,673 - - 1,412,865 - 147950,538 Total fund balance 14,379,003 13,537,673 3,668,624 9,069,734 1,412,865 42,067,899" Total liabilities and fund balances $ 16,315,809 $ 14,409,253 $ 9,750,107 $ 13,385,563 $ 1,515,982 $ 55,376,714 Fund balance reported above $ 42,067,899- Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net assets are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources, and therefore, are not reported in the funds 108,049,357 Other long -term assets are not available to pay for current - period expenditures and, therefore, are deferred in the funds 8',334,720 _ Long -term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds. 53,910,841 Net assets of governmental activities $,104,541,135 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 25 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTALFUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Expenditures: (117,479) Housing & (6,198,095) Current: Nonmajor Total Other financing sources (uses): General government Redevelopment Debt 845,788 6,235,352 Governmental Governmental - 85,287 General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds Revenues: - 88,529 - 3,693,595 Capital outlay: (470,091) - (7,015,785) General property taxes $ 19,983,295 $ - $ 2,258,981 $ - $ - $ 22,242,276 Tax increment collections - 8,578,434 - - - 8,578,434 Special assessments - - 564,534 1,877,956 - 2,442,490 Franchise fees - - - - 647,466 647,466 License and permits 2,885,781 - - 29,674 - 2,915,455 Intergovernmental 825,049 - - 1,927,656 253,178 3,005,883 Charges for services 3,039,841 - - 54,100 - 3,093,941 Fines and forfeitures 968,893 - - - 104,281 1,073,174 Investment income 260,249 463,894 35,411 359,446 66,899 1,185,899 Rental of property 254,437 - - 1,170 - 255,607 Other revenues 18,733 - - 9,664 98,326 126,723 Total revenues 28,236,278 9,042,328 2,858,926 4,259,666 1,170,150 45,567,348 Expenditures: (117,479) 5,570,450 (6,198,095) Current: 260,311 (8,063,918) Other financing sources (uses): General government 3,985,011 1,399,755 - 4,798 845,788 6,235,352 Public safety 13,639,459 - - 85,287 64,051 13,788,797 Public works 5,845,756 - - 343,838 - 6,189,594 Parks 3,605,066 - - 88,529 - 3,693,595 Capital outlay: (470,091) - (7,015,785) General government 23,159 - - 226,242 - 249,401 Public safety 574,566 - - 2,414,502 - 2,989,068 Public works 624,944 - - 8,002,768 - 8,627,712 Parks 55,796 2,072,123 - 672,807 - 2,800,726 Debt service: - (35,848) - Bond principal - - 7,090,000 - - 7,090,000 Interest and fiscal charges - - 1,967,021 - - 1,967,021 Total expenditures 28,353,757 3,471,878 9,057,021 11,838,771 909,839 53,631,266 Revenues over (under) expenditures (117,479) 5,570,450 (6,198,095) (7,579,105) 260,311 (8,063,918) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 742,800 - 6,540,785 700,000 - 7,983,585 Transfers out (450,000) (6,095,694) - (470,091) - (7,015,785) Sale of capital assets 96,825 - - - - 96,825 Bonds issued - - 435,393 7,319,607 - 7,755,000 Discount on bonds issued - - - (35,848) - (35,848) Total other financing sources (uses) 389,625 (6,095,694) 6,976,178 7,513,668 - 8,783,777 Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 272,146 (525,244) 778,083 (65,437) 260,311 719,859 Fund balance - January 1 14,106,857 14,062,917 2,890,541 9,135,171 1,152,554 41,348,040 Fund balance - December 31 $ 14,379,003 $ 13,537,673 $ 3,668,624 $ 9,069,734 $ 1,412,865 $ 42,067,899 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 26 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA - RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities (page.22 -23) are different because: Net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds (page 26) Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. In the statement of activities, only the gain on the sale of capital assets is reported. However,.in the governmental funds, the proceeds from the sale increases financial resources. Thus, the change in net assets differs from the change in fund balance by the cost of the capital assets sold. Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources (property tax and special assessment receivables) are not reported as revenues in the funds. The issuance of long -term debt (e.g., bonds, leases) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long -term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs, premiums, discounts and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. This amount is the net effect of these differences in the treatment of long -term debt and related items. Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources (OPEB obligations, accrued interest and amortization on debt and compensated absences payable) and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Change in net assets of governmental activities (page 23) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 27 $ 719,859 8,404,940 (95,560) 3,409,808 (583,915) (521,065) $ 11,334,067 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS PROPRIETARY FUNDS December 31, 2008 Liabilities: Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Current liabilities: Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise 557 54,372 Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total Assets: 73,830 214,467 Accrued interest payable 326,848 - 20,304 Current assets: 4,121 386,247 Contracts payable 173,759 - - Cash and cash equivalents $ 73,546 $ 22,880 $ 994,383 $ 13,031 $ 46,334 $ 1,150,174 Investments - unrestricted 5,661,316 - - - 3,936,326 9,597,642 Investments - restricted 8,116,762 - - - - 8,116,762 Interest receivable 69,459 - - - 29,962 99,421 Accounts receivable, net 3,452,033 1,500 - 1,960 130,361 3,585,854 Special assessments receivable 241,307 - - - - 241,307 Due from other funds - 1,100,000 185,000 - 15,000 1,300,000 Due from other governments 5,956 - - - - 5,956 Prepaid expenses 344,406 - - - - 344,406 Inventory 37,157 1,088,372 - 48,973 11,436 1,185,938 Total current assets 18,001,942 2,212,752 1,179,383 63,964 4,169,419 25,627,460 Noncurrent assets: unamortized discounts 21,734,075 - 839,228 Deferred charges 114,108 - 1,859 1,848 - 117,815 Net capital assets 53,034,600 1,239,571 1,938,106 5,194,083 3,942,507 65,348,867 Total noncurrent assets 53,148,708 1,239,571 1,939,965 5,195,931 3,942,507 65,466,682 Total assets 71,150,650 3,452,323 3,119,348 5,259,895 8,111,926 91,094,142 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable 525,986 351,040 557 54,372 313,064 1,245,019 Salaries payable 50,133 48,636 373 41,495 73,830 214,467 Accrued interest payable 326,848 - 20,304 34,974 4,121 386,247 Contracts payable 173,759 - - - - 173,759 Due to other funds - - - 1,100,000 15,000 1,115,000 Due to other governments 10,100 136,728 954 6,272 7,474 161,528 Deposits payable 112,216 - - 11,205 - 123,421 Unearned revenue - 3,865 11 42,674 56,578 103,128 Net OPEB obligation 10,547 6,498 - 9,155 10,974 37,174 Compensated absences payable 82,478 91,744 - 118,427 124,354 417,003 Bonds payable - current 2,045,000 - 120,000 515,000 225,000 2,905,000 Total current liabilities 3,337,067 638,511 142,199 1,933,574 830,395 6,881,746 Noncurrent liabilities: Compensated absences payable 123,718 137,617 - 177,640 186,530 625,505 Bonds payable, net of unamortized discounts 21,734,075 - 839,228 1,135,590 - 23,708,893 Total noncurrent liabilities 21,857,793 137,617 839,228 1,313,230 186,530 24,334,398 Total liabilities 25,194,860 776,128 981,427 3,246,804 1,016,925 31,216,144 Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 37,372,287 1,239,571 978,878 3,543,493 3,717,507 46,851,736 Restricted for debt service - - 954,486 - - 954,486 Unrestricted 8,583,503 1,436,624 204,557 (1,530,402) 3,377,494 12,071,776 Total net assets $ 45,955,790 $ 2,676,195 $ 2,137,921 $ 2,013,091 $ 7,095,001 $ 59,877,998 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 28 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET ASSETS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total Operating revenues: Sales - liquor $ - $ 12,121,791 $ - $ 145,904 $ - $ 12,267,695 Sales - retail - - 4,991 233,473 42,792 281,256 - 'Sales - utilities 13,268;450 - - - - ' 13,268,450 Sales - concessions - - . 127,087 243,848 63,280 434,215 ` Memberships - - 450,720 110,313 87,618 648,651, Admissions - - 313,735 315,013 647155 1,275,903` Building rental - - 26,758- ` 85,603 1,404;096. 1,516;452 Rental of equipment - - - 361,566 95,460 457,026 Greens fees - - - 1,846,317 177,109 2,023;426 Other fees 276,278 - 2,102 338,547 999,708 1,616,635 Total operating revenues 13,544,728 12,121,791 925,388 3,680,584 3,517,218 33,789,709 Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 22,265 8,940,015 32,754 .350,320 78,187 9;423,541 Personal services 1;506,565 1,329,629 269,949.., 1,748,175 1,982,714 6,837,032 Contractual services 5,651,008 437,691 131,058 559521. 1,460,541 8,239,819 Commodities 829,080 76,209 87,700 358,704 388,612 1,740,305 Central Services 504,598 193,091 27,482 113,474 163,231 1,001,876 Depreciation 1,562,906 69,874 196,575 467,186 418,964 2,655,505 Total operating expenses 10,076,422 11,046,509 745,518 3,537,380 4,492,249 29,898,078 Operating income (loss) 31468,306 1,075,282 179,870 143,204 (975,031) 3,891,631 Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Intergovernmental 120,982 - - - - 120,982 Investment income 225,305 - - - 382,007 607,312 Donations - - - - 26,474 26,474 Interest and fiscal charges (548,859) - (41,040) (.70,763) (8,354) (669,016) Amortization of bond discount 35 - (1,105) (4,339) (2,246) (7,655) Gain (loss) on sale of capital asset (565) (2,714) - 14,505 - 11,226 Miscellaneous 168,521 808 - - - - 169,329 Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) (34,581) (1,906) (42,145) (60;597) 397,881 258,652 Income (loss) before transfers 3,433,725. 1,073,376 137,725 82,607 (577,150) 4,150,283 Transfers: Transfers in - - - 170,000 240,000 410,060 Transfers out (100,000) (1,277,800) - - - (1,377,800) Total transfers (100,000) (1,277,800) - 170,000 240,000 (967,800) Change in net assets 3,333,725 (204,424) 137,725 252,607 (337,150) 3,182,483 Net assets - January 1 42,622,065 2,880,619 2,000,196 1,760,484 7,432,151 56,695,515 Net assets - December 31 $ 45;955,790 $ 2,676,195 $ 2,137,921 $ 2,013,091 $ 7,095,001 $ 59,877,998 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 29 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total Cash flows from operating activities: 120,982 - - - - 120,982 Transfer from other funds - - - Receipts from customers and users $ 13,388,426 $ 12,120,537 $ 925,399 $ 3,688,979 $ 3,536,453 $ 33,659,794 Payment to suppliers (6,919,058) (9,563,540) (278,381) (1,380,958) (1,903,262) (20,045,199) Payment to employees (1,501,021) (1,282,714) (269,952) (1,704,393) (1,924,214) (6,682,294) Donations - - - - 26,474 26,474 Miscellaneous revenue 168,521 808 - - - 169,329 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 5,136,868 1,275,091 377,066 603,628 (264,549) 7,128,104 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: State grant 120,982 - - - - 120,982 Transfer from other funds - - - 170,000 240,000 410,000 Transfer to other funds (100,000) (1,277,800) - - - (1,377,800) Proceeds from interfund borrowing - - 270,000 100,000 15,000 385,000 Payment of interfund borrowing (140,000) (100,000) (185,000) (130,000) (15,000) (570,000) Net cash provided by (used in) noncapital financing activities (119,018) (1,377,800) 85,000 140,000 240,000 (1,031,818) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Proceeds from capital debt 14,067,158 Acquisition of capital assets (9,518,872) Proceeds from sale of capital assets 874 Principal paid on bonds (1,485,000) Interest paid on bonds (459,984) Net cash provided by (used in) capital and related financing activities 2,604,176 Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of investments Purchase of investments Investment income Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 (7,753,978) 201,614 14,067,158 (154,960) (480,113) (10,153,945) 14,505 - 15,379 (115,000) (510,000) (220,000) (2,330,000) (43,221) (81,503) (11,230) (595,938) (158,221) (731,958) (711,343) 1,002,654 - - 352,680 352,680 - (7,753,978) 247,320 448,934 (7,552,364) - - - 600,000 (6,952,364) 69,662 (102,709) 303,845 11,670 (135,892) 146,576 3,884 125,589 690,538 1,361 182,226 1,003,598 $ 73,546 $ 22,880 $ 994,383 $ 13,031 $ 46,334 $ 1,150,174 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 30 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December. 31, 2008 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 5,136,868 $ 1,275,091 $ 377,066 $ 603,628 $ (264,549) $ 7,128,104 Noncash investing activities: Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments 1___(20,479) $ - $ - $ - $ 132,047 $ 111,568' The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 31 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total Reconciliation of operating income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Operating income (loss) $ 3,468,306 $ 1,075,282 $ 179,870 $ 143,204 $ (975,031) $ 3,891,631 Adjustments.to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 1,562,906 69,874 196,575 407,186 418,964 2,655,505 Donations - - - - 26,474 26,474 Miscellaneous revenue 168,521 808 - - - 169,329 Changes in assets and liabilities: . Decrease (increase) in receivables (118,432) (1,500) - (1,395) 17,615 (103,712) Decrease (increase) in special assessments (34,507) - - - - (34,507) Decrease (increase) in due from other governments (3,363) - - - - (3,363). Decrease (increase) in inventory (18,401) (48,923) - (6,442) 2,557 (71,209) Decrease (increase) in prepaid items (33,342) - - - - (33,342) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (31,248) 125,494 304 2,560 183,873 280,983 Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 19,496 10,808 (3) 10,281 22,968 63,550 Increase(decrease)in contracts payable 170,361 - - - - 170,361 Increase (decrease) in due to other governments 523 6,895 309 1,351 879 9,957 Increase (decrease) in deposits - - - 3,592 - 3,592 Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue - 246 11 9,790 1,620 11,667 Increase (decrease) in net OPEB obligation 10,547 6,498 - 9,155 10,974 37,174 Increase (decrease) in compensated absences (24,499) 29,609 - 24,346 24,558 54,014 Total adjustments 1,668,562 199,809 197,196 460,424 710,482 3,236,473 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 5,136,868 $ 1,275,091 $ 377,066 $ 603,628 $ (264,549) $ 7,128,104 Noncash investing activities: Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments 1___(20,479) $ - $ - $ - $ 132,047 $ 111,568' The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 31 CITY OF EDINA,;MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF. FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS AGENCY FUNDS December 31, 2008 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 32 Agency Funds Assets Cash $ 48;625 . Investments 245,000 Total assets $ 293,625 Liabilities Accounts payable $ 29,621 Salaries payable 4,187 Due to other governmental units 259,817 Total liabilities $ 293,625 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 32 Notes to the Financial Statements CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The City of Edina. (the City) was incorporated, in 1888 and operates under the, State of Minnesota Statutory. Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five- member City Council elected by voters. of;the City. The financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted_,in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) as applied`to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following is a summary-of significant accounting policies. A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY The City's financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b) organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit's governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on, the primary government. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the reporting entity include those of the City of Edina (the primary government) and its component units. The component units discussed below are included in the City's reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships with the City. COMPONENT UNITS In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the component unit have been included in the financial reporting entity as a blended component unit. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of the City's operations because the members of the City Council serve as HRA board members and its activity is confined to the City of Edina. The activity of the HRA is reported in the Special Revenue Funds. Separate financial statements are not prepared for the HRA. ` 33 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 B. GOVERNMENT -WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net assets and the statement of changes in net assets) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or business -type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business -type activity. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or business -type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business type activity. Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government -wide financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds is reported in a single column in the fund financial statements C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and fiduciary fund financial statements. The City's only fiduciary fund type, agency funds, are custodial in nature and do not have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due. 34 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December. 31, 2008 Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible . to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as` revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and,available only when cash is received by_the City. The City reports the following major governmental funds: The general fund is the government's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The special revenue Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are. designated for housing and redevelopment. The debt service fund accounts for the, payment of principal and interest on the Tax Increment, General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, and Public Project Revenue Bonds: The capital projects construction fund accounts for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for capital improvements as' designated in the City's capital,improvement budget. The City reports the following major proprietary funds: The utility fund accounts for the provision of water, sewer and recycling services to the City's residents. The liquor fund accounts for the operation of the City's three liquor stores. The aquatic center fund accounts for the operation of the City's aquatic center. The golf course fund accounts for the operation of the City's three golf courses and a golf dome. Additionally, the City reports the following fund type: Agency - the police seizure and Public Safety Training Facility funds account for fees collected for other government agencies and the payroll: fund accounts for payroll deductions withheld from employee paychecks but not yet sent to the appropriate party (includes federal and state taxes, health care deductions, etc). 35 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Private - sector standards of accounting and financial reporting issued prior to December 1, 1989, generally are followed in both the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements to the extent that those standards do not conflict with or contradict guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Governments also have the option of following subsequent private- sector guidance for their business -type activities and enterprise funds, subject to this same limitation. The City has elected not to follow subsequent private- sector guidance. As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government -wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City of Edina. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned. Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the utilities, liquor, aquatic center, golf course, arena, art center and Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake enterprise funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for an allowable use, it is the City's policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on long -term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of Activities. 911 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 D. CASH AND INVESTMENTS The City's cash-and cash equivalents are considered to be deposits and cash on hand for purposes of the cash flow statement. Cash balances from all funds are pooled together and invested to the maximum extent at favorable rates. This also allows certain funds to,generate a temporary cash overdraft. Interest earned is allocated as determined by the Investment Advisory Committee. The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash balances by means of an advance from another fund shown as interfund receivables in the advancing fund, and an interfund payable in the fund with the deficit, until adequate resources are received. These interfund balances are eliminated on the government -wide financial statements. ` The City reports its investments at fair value based on quoted market prices. Changes in fair value of securities in the City's investment portfolio are recorded as a net change in fair value of investments in the City's fund financial statements and within general revenues in the government -wide financial statements. E. RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds for goods provided or services rendered. Short-term interfund loan's are classified as "due to /from other funds." All short-term interfund receivables and payables at December 31, 2008 are planned to be eliminated lw2009. Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business -type activities are reported in the government -wide financial statements as "internal balances." Property taxes and special assessments receivables have been reported net of estimated uncollectible accounts. Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material for other receivables and have not been reported. 37 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 F. REVENUE RECOGNITION 1. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in December (levy /assessment date) of each year for collection in the following year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for itself, the City, the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 7 and December 2 of the same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which the taxes were levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported. GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and delinquent taxes and State credits received by the City in July, December and January are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes and credits not received at the year end are classified as delinquent and due from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by the City in January are fully offset by deferred revenue because they are not available to finance current expenditures. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance with State Statutes. These assessments are collectible by the City over a term of years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do) prepay future installments without interest or prepayment penalties. Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action. If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit sale. Pursuant to State Statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax forfeit sale 38 M CITY OF.EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 after three years unless, it is homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational land in which event the property is subject to such sale after five years.. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The'City recognizes special "assessment revenue in the period that the assessment roll was adopted- by the City Council. Uncollectible special assessments are not material and have not been reported. GOVERNMENTAL.FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when it becomes measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are recognized as revenue for the current year. Special assessments that are collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the'following January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining delinquent, deferred and special deferred assessments receivable in governmental funds are completely offset by deferred revenues. G. INVENTORIES, PREPAID ITEMS AND DEFERRED CHARGES Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost and are recorded as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased. Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government -wide and fund.financial statements. Deferred charges represent deferred issuance costs. H. CAPITAL ASSETS Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment-and parks, are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the government -wide financial statements. Capital assets are also reported in the proprietary fund financial statements but not in the` governmental fund financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $10,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of three years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost.or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed: Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and. repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Infrastructure assets include all of the City's assets since inception. 39 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Property, plant and equipment of the primary government is depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Life Golf course 10 - 35 years Land improvements 20 — 50 years Buildings and structures 20 - 40 years Furniture and office equipment 5 - 10 years Vehicles and equipment 3 - 20 years Parks 5 - 100 years Distribution system 50 years Collection system 10 - 50 years Storm sewers 50 years Wells 7 - 30 years I. COMPENSATED ABSENCES It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards No. 16, Accounting for Compensated Absences, no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized for that portion of accumulating sick leave benefits that is vested as severance pay. According to City policy, vested sick leave benefits are liquidated into a health care savings plan upon separation. J. LONG -TERM OBLIGATIONS In the government -wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long -term debt and other long -term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business -type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net assets. Bond premiums and discounts, as well as issuance costs, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bond using the straight -line method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. Bond issuance costs are reported as deferred charges and amortized over the term of the related debt. 40 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond'premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued.plus'any premium: received is reported as other financing sources. Discounts on debt issuances are'reported,as other financing uses" Issuance costs, whether or not Withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as. debt service expenditures. K. FUND EQUITY. In -the fund financial statements, governmental funds report reservations of fund balance for amounts that are not available for appropriation or are legally restricted by outside parties for use for a specific purpose. Designations of fund balance represent tentative management plans that are subject to change. L. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures /expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures /expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of expenditures /expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Interfund loans are reported as an interfund loan receivable or payable which offsets the movement of cash between funds. All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers. M. NET ASSETS Net assets represent the difference between assets and liabilities in.the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements. Net assets invested in capital assets, net of related debt, consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any long -term debt used to build or acquire the capital assets. Net assets are, reported as restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions: imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments: N. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates. 41 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 O. JOINT VENTURES The City's investment in joint venture is reported in the statement of net assets as governmental activities capital assets and is equal to the City's interest in the net assets of the joint venture. The City's interest is based on the allocation in the joint powers agreement. Note 2 RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENT -WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A. EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCE SHEET AND THE GOVERNMENT -WIDE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS The governmental fund balance sheet includes a reconciliation between fund balance — total governmental funds and net assets — governmental activities as reported in the government -wide statement of net assets. One element of that reconciliation explains that "long -term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds." The details of this difference are as follows: Bonds payable $ 49,880,000 Plus: issuance premium 36,553 Less: issuance discount (273,307) Less: deferred charge for issuance costs (265,423) Accrued interest payable 751,478 OPEB obligation 270,330 Compensated absences 3,511,210 Net adjustment to reduce fund balance - total governmental funds to arrive at net assets - governmental activities $ 53,910,841 B. EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES AND THE GOVERNMENT -WIDE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances includes a reconciliation between net changes in fund balances — total governmental funds and changes in net assets of governmental activities as reported in the government -wide statement of activities. One element of that reconciliation explains that "Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense." The details of this difference are as follows: 42 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Capital outlay Depreciation expense $ 13,468,614 (5,063,674) Net adjustment to increase net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds to arrive at changes in net assets of governmental funds $ 8,404,940 Another element of that reconciliation states that "The issuance of long -term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while.the repayment of the principal of long -term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs, premiums, discounts and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities." The details of this difference areas follows: Debt issued or incurred: Issuance of PIR bonds $ 7,755,000 Less issuance costs (45,237) Less discounts (35,848) Principal repayments: Tax increment debt (5,650,000) General obligation debt (570,000) Permanent improvement revolving debt (155;000) Public project revenue debt' . (715;000) Net adjustment to decrease net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds to arrive at changes in net assets of governmental activities $ 583,915 Another element of that reconciliation states that "Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds." The details of this difference are as follows: OPEB obligation $ (270,330) Compensated,.absences (248,698) Accrued interest 94,264 Amortization of issuance costs (60,570) -Amortization of bond discounts (35,731) Net adjustment to decrease net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds to arrive at changes in net assets of governmental activities $ (521,065) 43 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Note 3 CASH AND INVESTMENTS A. COMPONENTS OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS Cash and investments at year -end consist of the following: Deposits Cash on hand Investments $ 1,223,983 19,085 62,550,032 $ 63,793,100 Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows: Cash and cash equivalents - Statement of Net Assets $ 1,194,443 Investments - Statement of Net Assets 49,571,183 Restricted investments - Statement of Net Assets 12,733,849 Cash and investments - Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets 293,625 $ 63,793,100 The City had restricted investments of $12,733,849 as of December 31, 2008 that represent unspent bond proceeds to be used for construction projects. B. DEPOSITS In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits: Custodial credit risk — In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City's deposits may be lost. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AA" or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an 44 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 account at a trust department of:a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The City's investment policy does not contain further restrictions on the types of collateral required.. At year -end, the carrying amount of the City's deposits was $1,223,983 while the balance on the bank records was $1,295,419. At December-31, 2008, all deposits were fully covered by federal'depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name. C. INVESTMENTS The City has the following investments at year end: N/A - Not Applicable N/R - Not Rated -The City's money market investments don't'have maturities The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is an unrated 2a7 -like pool and the fair value of the position in the pool is the same as the value of pool shares. Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant: 45 Credit Risk _ Interest Risk - Maturity Duration in Years Investment Rating Agency < 1 1 to 5 5 to 10 10+ Total U.S' Treasuries N/A N/A $ 30,806 $ $ 146,730 $ 728,618 $ 906,154 GNMA N/A N/A - - 40,844 40,844 SBA Notes AAA/Aaa S &P /Mdy's - 10,182 292,670 392,452 695,304 U.S. Agencies P -1 Mdy's 4,978,274 - - - 4,978,274 U.S. Agencies AAA/Aaa S &P /Mdy's 6,744,416 11,522,231 2,049,440 3,433,913 23,750,000 Municipals N/R N/A - 30,083 - - 30,083 Municipals A S &P - 10,152 - 10,152 Municipals AAA/AAA S &P /Fitch 10,193 41,222 75,825 127,240 Commercial A3 /P2/ S &P /Mdy's/ paper F1 Fitch 990,150 - - 990,150 Negotiable CD's N/R N/A 12,244,432 384,088 121628,520 Interfund Debt N/R N/A - 1,400,000 1,400,000 $ 24,998,271 $ 13,397,958 $ 2,564,665 $ 4,595,827 45,556,721 Money Market' AAA S &P . 12,722,910 4M Fund' N/R N/A 4,270,401 Total investments $ 62,550,032 N/A - Not Applicable N/R - Not Rated -The City's money market investments don't'have maturities The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is an unrated 2a7 -like pool and the fair value of the position in the pool is the same as the value of pool shares. Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant: 45 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Custodial credit risk — For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker - dealer) the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City's investment policy specifically addresses custodial credit risk, requiring the City to limit its exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities. Credit risk — This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City's investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations rated "AX or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated "A" or better; bankers' acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker - dealers. The City's investment policies specifically address credit risk, further limiting the City's exposure to credit risk by requiring that all state and local government obligations to be rated "AK or better by a national rating agency. Concentration risk — This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the City's investment (considered 5 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as Treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The City's investment policies specifically address the City's desire to limit concentration risk, but do not set specific guidelines for measurement of this risk. At year -end, the City's investments include 15 %, 9% and 19% in securities issued by FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA, respectively. Interest rate risk — This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investment resulting in changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City's investment policies specifically address the City's desire to limit interest rate risk, but do not set specific guidelines for measurement of this risk. Erl CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Note 4 CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2008 is as follows: Certain capital assets. were reclassified -to different categories during the year, and these reclassifications are reflected in the "Increases" and "Decreases" columns above. 47 Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance Governmental activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $ 15,872,364 $ 109,000 $ - $ 15,981,364 Investment in joint venture 11452,465 - 1,452,465 Construction in progress 15,380,765 10,880,620 (12,848,795) 13,412,590 Total capital assets not being depreciated 32,705,594 10,989,620 (12,848,795) 30,846,419 Capital assets being depreciated: Land improvements 21,699,762 - 21,699,762 Buildings and structures 30,008,937 5,009,228 35,018,165 Furniture and office equipment 2,606,162 23,864 (14,362) 2,615,664 Vehicles and equipment 13,535,156 969,996 (616,415) 13,888,737 Infrastructure 63,126,263 6,946,368 (1,069,117) 69,003,514 Parks 12,708,329 2,378,333 (417,380) 14,669,282 Total capital assets being depreciated 143,684,609 15,327,789 (2,117,274) 156,895,124 Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements (10,776,848) (794,374) (11,571,222) Buildings and structures (8,871,510) (893,154) - (9,764,664) Furniture and office equipment (1,067,702) (201,967) 14,362 (1,255,307) Vehicles and equipment (6,635,181) (1,140,217)• 529,787 (7,245,611) Infrastructure (43,543,416) (1,573,883) 1,060,185 (44,057,114) Parks (5,755,569) (460,079), 417,380 (5,798,268) Total accumulated depreciation (76,650,226) (5,063,674) 2,021;714 (79,692,186) Total capital assets being depreciated, net 67,034,383 10,264,115 (95,560) 77,202,938 Governmental activities capital assets, net $ 99,739,977 $ 21,253,735 $ (12,944,355) $ 108,049,357 Certain capital assets. were reclassified -to different categories during the year, and these reclassifications are reflected in the "Increases" and "Decreases" columns above. 47 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance Business -type activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $ 1,088,965 $ - $ - $ 1,088,965 Construction in progress 4,580,127 9,705,696 (4,316,859) 9,968,964 Total capital assets not being depreciated 5,669,092 9,705,696 (4,316,859) 11,057,929 Capital assets being depreciated: Land improvements & golf course 8,120,479 - (39,865) 8,080,614 Buildings and structures 15,999,450 261,422 (158,217) 16,102,655 Furniture and office equipment 149,436 - (27,756) 121,680 Vehicles and equipment 5,192,750 189,471 (466,943) 4,915,278 Utility infrastructure 64,413,092 4,316,859 (281,781) 68,448,170 Lease property capital lease 468,580 - 468,580 Total capital assets being depreciated 94,343,787 4,767,752 (974,562) 98,136,977 Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements & golf course (4,078,349) (298,924) 39,865 (4,337,408) Buildings and structures (9,184,164) (590,338) 158,217 (9,616,285) Furniture and office equipment (125,053) (14,355) 27,756 (111,652) Vehicles and equipment (2,924,078) (362,380) 460,146 (2,826,312) Utility infrastructure (25,378,075) (1,389,508) 281,781 (26,485,802) Lease property capital lease (468,580) (468,580) Total accumulated depreciation (42,158,299) (2,655,505) 967,765 (43,846,039) Total capital assets being depreciated, net 52,185,488 2,112,247 (6,797) 54,290,938 Business -type activities capital assets, net $ 57,854,580 $ 11,817,943 $ (4,323,656) $ 65,348,867 48 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Depreciation expense was charged to functions /programs of the primary government as follows: Governmental activities: General government $ 489,047 ;Public safety 619,626 Public works 2,330,919 Parks ,. 1,624,082 Total depreciation expense - governmental activities $ 5,063;674 Business -type activities: Utilities $ 1,562,906 Liquor 69,874 Aquatic Center 196,575 . Golf Course 407,186 Arena 286,033 Art Center 30,206 Edinborough Park /Centennial Lakes 102,725 Total depreciation expense'- business -type activities $ 2,655,505 CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS At December 31, 2008, the City had construction project contracts in progress. The commitments related to the remaining contract balances are summarized as follows: Contracf Remaining ,Project # Project Description Amount Commitment 0 &1 Eng Country Club Reconstruction $ 14,198,279 $ 6,491,163 08 -6 Eng Street/Sidewalk Reconstruction 2,074,564 63,805 08 -11 Eng Street/Sidewalk Reconstruction 168,509 .34,562 08 -12 Eng Street/Sidewalk Reconstruction 615,695 57,006 07-4 PW New Well 297,890 4;593. 08 -3 PW New Well 373;013 9,808 08 -5 PW Well Rehab 328,328 1,607 $ 6,662,544 Note 5 LONG -TERM DEBT The City has five types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2008: tax increment bonds, general obligation bonds, public improvement revolving bonds, public project revenue bonds and G.O. revenue bonds. The frst type of bond is payable solely from tax increment monies with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The second type is payable from general property taxes. The third type is payable from special assessments. The fourth type is payable solely from annual appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. The fifth type is 49 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 payable primarily from enterprise revenue with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The reporting entity's long -term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be repaid from business -type activities. GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES As of December 31, 2008, the governmental long -term bonded debt of the financial reporting entity consisted of the following: General Obligation Bonds: General Obligation - Park & Recreation Refunding, 2005A 3.50 -4.00% 7/19/2005 2/1/2017 5,375,000 4,555,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2007A 4.00 -4.25% 5/24/2007 2/1/2028 5,865,000 5,865,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 11,240,000 10,420,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: Final Revolving, 2005E 3.00- 3.75% 9/13/2005 2/1/2016 Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable Revolving, 2007C 3.60 -4.00% 5/24/2007 2/1/2019 Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/08 Tax Increment Bonds: 7,755,000 7,755,000 Total PIR Bonds 15,085,000 14,770,000 Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2000A 4.30 -4.80% 9/6/2000 2/1/2011 $ 2,620,000 $ 920,000 Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2002B 3.00% 8/5/2002 2/1/2012 1,400,000 1,400,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2005B 3.00% 7/19/2005 2/1/2009 10,520,000 3,235,000 Tax Increment Taxable Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C 3.75 -4.25% 7/19/2005 2/1/2009 6,220,000 1,885,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2005D 3.00 -3.40% 7/19/2005 2/1/2013 3,505,000 2,575,000 Total Tax Increment Bonds 24,265,000 10,015,000 General Obligation Bonds: General Obligation - Park & Recreation Refunding, 2005A 3.50 -4.00% 7/19/2005 2/1/2017 5,375,000 4,555,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2007A 4.00 -4.25% 5/24/2007 2/1/2028 5,865,000 5,865,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 11,240,000 10,420,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2005E 3.00- 3.75% 9/13/2005 2/1/2016 1,460,000 1,145,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2007C 3.60 -4.00% 5/24/2007 2/1/2019 5,870,000 5,870,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2008B 3.00 -4.00% 8/28/2008 2/1/2020 7,755,000 7,755,000 Total PIR Bonds 15,085,000 14,770,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds Public Project Revenue, Series 2002 4.00 -5.25% 1/1/2002 211/2021 12,410,000 9,625,000 Public Project Revenue, Series 2005 3.50 -4.13% 9/13/2005 5/1/2026 5,425,000 5,050,000 Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 17,835,000 14,675,000 Total bonded indebtedness - governmental activities $ 68,425,000 $ 49,880,000 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 BUSINESS -TYPE ACTIVITIES 51 Final Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/08 Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1999B 3.70 -4.45% 5/3/1999 1/1/2013 $ .3,210,000 $ 1,675,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2061A 2.25 -4.65% 11/1/2001 1/1/2017 4,620,000 1,170,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A 3.20 -4.20% 5/3/1999 2/1/2009 3,600,000 420,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2003C 1.10- 3.55% 3/1/2003 2/1/2013 3,200,000 1,725,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B 4.00% 5/24/2007 2/1/2017 8,210,000 7,440,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A 3.00 -4.25% 8/28/2008 2/1/2019 13,985,000 13,985,000 _ Total Revenue Bonds 36,885,000 26,415,000 Total bonded indebtedness - business -type activities $ 36,885,000 $ r- 26,415,000 Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the City's bonds are as follows: Governmental Activities Tax General Public Improvement Year Ending Increment Bonds Obligation Bonds Revolving Bonds December 31 Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2009 $ 5,890,000 $ 244,236 $ 630,000 $ 397,869 $ 150,000 $ 513,708 2010 805,000 125,820 '660,000 374,294 655,000 520,278 2011 840,000 94,359 680,000 349,806 1,330,000 486;944 2012 1,930,000 48,445 705,000 324,494 1,375,000 442,069 2013 550,000 9,350 730,000 297,631 1,415,000 395,269 2014 -2018 - - 3,510,000 1,036 :676 7,495,000 1,185,156 2019 -2023 - 1,575,000 569,807 2,350,000 84,200 2024 -2028 - - 1,930,000 210,947 - Total $ 10,015,000 $ 522,210 $ 10,420,000 $ 3,561,524 $ 14,770,000 $ 3,627,624' Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Public Project Revenue Year Ending Revenue Bonds Bonds December 31 Principal Interest Principal Interest 2009 $ 745,000 $ 665,193 $ 2,905,000 $ 906,314 2010 780,000 632,880 2,570,000 846,283 2011 810,000 598,880 2,675,000 754,562 2012 850,000 561,885 2,780,000 656,742 2013 885,000 521,695 2,875,000 .553,066 2014 -2018 5,095,000 1,919,000 11,015;000 1,388,015 2019 -2023 4,380,000 623,444 1,595,000' . 33,894 2024 -2028 1,130,000 71,363 - Total $ 14,675,000 $ 5,594,340 $ 26,415,000 $ 5,138,876 51 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 CHANGE IN LONG -TERM LIABILITIES Long -term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2008, was as follows: For governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the general fund. The City issued $13,985,000 of General Obligation Revenue bonds, Series 2008A to finance various utility infrastructure improvement projects. The City anticipates that utility revenues will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. The City also issued $7,755,000 of General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) bonds, Series 2008B to provide financing for infrastructure improvements. The City anticipates that special assessments to benefitted properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. 52 Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year Governmental activities: Bonds payable: Tax increment $ 15,665,000 $ - $ (5,650,000) $ 10,015,000 $ 5,890,000 General obligation 10,990,000 - (570,000) 10,420,000 630,000 PIR 7,170,000 7,755,000 (155,000) 14,770,000 150,000 Public project revenue 15,390,000 - (715,000) 14,675,000 745,000 Less deferred amounts: Discount on bonds (284,850) (35,848) 47,391 (273,307) - Premiums 48,213 - (11,660) 36,553 - Total bonds payable 48,978,363 7,719,152 (7,054,269) 49,643,246 7,415,000 Compensated absences 3,262,512 1,576,075 (1,327,377) 3,511,210 1,404,484 Governmental activity Long -term liabilities $ 52,240,875 $ 9,295,227 $ (8,381,646) $ 53,154,456 $ 8,819,484 Business -type activities: Bonds payable: Revenue bonds $ 14,760,000 $ 13,985,000 $ (2,330,000) $ 26,415,000 $ 2,905,000 Less deferred amounts: Discount on bonds (25,646) - 8,142 (17,504) - Premiums 74,066 155,459 (13,128) 216,397 - Total bonds payable 14,808,420 14,140,459 (2,334,986) 26,613,893 2,905,000 Compensated absences 988,494 348,881 (294,867) 1,042,508 417,003 Business -type activity Long -term liabilities $ 15,796,914 $ 14,489,340 $ (2,629,853) $ 27,656,401 $ 3,322,003 For governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the general fund. The City issued $13,985,000 of General Obligation Revenue bonds, Series 2008A to finance various utility infrastructure improvement projects. The City anticipates that utility revenues will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. The City also issued $7,755,000 of General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) bonds, Series 2008B to provide financing for infrastructure improvements. The City anticipates that special assessments to benefitted properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. 52 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Note 7 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE A. PLAN DESCRIPTION• All full -time and certain part-time, employees of the City of Edina are' covered by defined benefit, plans,administered by the Public Employees, Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the Public Employees Retirementfund (PERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which are cost- sharing, multiple - employer:retirement plans. These plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Chapters 353 and 356. PERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, firefighters and peace officers who-qualify for membership by statute are.covered by the PEPFF. 53 Note 6 LEGAL -DEBT MARGIN The City is subject to a statutory limitation by the State of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness payable principally from property taxes. The City of Edina's legal debt margin for 2008 is computed as follows: December 31, 2008 Market Value (after fiscal disparities) $ 10,079,498,900 Debt Limit (3% of Market Value) $ 302,384,967 Amount of debt applicable to debt limit: Total bonded debt $ 76,295,000 Less: Tax. increment bonds (10,015,000) Public improvement revolving bonds (14,770,000) Revenue bonds (26,415,000). Total debt applicable to debt limit $ 25,095,000 Legal debt margin $ 277,289,967 Note 7 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE A. PLAN DESCRIPTION• All full -time and certain part-time, employees of the City of Edina are' covered by defined benefit, plans,administered by the Public Employees, Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the Public Employees Retirementfund (PERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which are cost- sharing, multiple - employer:retirement plans. These plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Chapters 353 and 356. PERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, firefighters and peace officers who-qualify for membership by statute are.covered by the PEPFF. 53 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors upon death of eligible members. Benefits are established by State Statute, and vest after three years of credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERF's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step -rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7% for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years and 1.7% for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7% of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7% for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual rate is 3.0% for each year of service. For all PEPFF and PERF members hired prior to July 1, 1989 whose annuity is calculated using Method 1, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. Normal retirement age is 55 for PEPFF and 65 for Basic and Coordinated members hired prior to July 1, 1989. Normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66 for Coordinated members hired on or after July 1, 1989. A reduced retirement annuity is also available to eligible members seeking early retirement. There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A single -life annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree — no survivor annuity is payable. There are also various types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will be payable over joint lives. Members.may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of contributions are available at any time to members who leave public service, but before retirement benefits begin. The benefit provisions stated in the previous paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. PERA issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for PERF and PEPFF. That report may be obtained on the internet at www.mnpera.org, by writing to PERA at 60 Empire Drive #200, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55103 -2088 or by calling (651) 296 -7460 or 1- 800 - 652 -9026. 54 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 B. FUNDING POLICY Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. These statutes are established and amended by,the state legislature: The City makes: annual contributions to the pension plans equal to the amount required by state statutes. PERF Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan,memtiers were required to contribute 9.10% and.6.0 %, respectively, of their..covered salary in 2008. PEPFF members were required. to contribute 8.6% of their covered salary in.2008. That rate will increase to 9.4% in 2009. The City of Edina is required to contribute the following percentages of annual covered payroll: 11.78% for Basic Plan PERF members, 6.5% for Coordinated Plan PERF members, and 12.9% for PEPFF members. Employer contribution, rates for the Coordinated Plan and PEPFF will increase to 6.75% and 14.1 % respectively, effective January 1, 2009. The City's contributions to the Public Employees Retirement Fund for the years ending December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 were $860,091, $785,482, and $696,014, respectively. The City's contributions to the Public. Employees Police and Fire Fund for the years ending December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 were $855,910, $738,399, and $632,892, respectively. The City's contributions were equal to the contractually required contributions for each year as set by state statute. Note 8 OTHER POST - EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN A. Plan Description In 2008, the City prospectively implemented the requirement of a new accounting pronouncement, GASB Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions. The City provides post - employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees through City's Other Post - Employment Benefits Plan, a single - employer defined benefit plan administered by the City. All post - employment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. These contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. These benefits are summarized as follows: Post- Employment Insurance Benefits --All retirees of the City have the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City from the time of retirement until the' employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance. The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known; as an "implicit rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the City's younger and statistically healthier active employees. 55 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 B. Funding Policy The required contribution is based on projected pay -as- you -go financing requirements, with additional amounts to pre -fund benefits as determined annually by the City. C. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The City's annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on annual required contributions (ARC) of the City, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the City's annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the changes in the City's net OPEB obligation to the plan: Annual required contribution $ 439,466 Interest on net OPEB obligation - Adjustment to annual required contribution - Annual OPEB cost (expense) 439,466 Contributions made (131,962) Increase in net OPEB obligation 307,504 Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year - Net OPEB obligation - end of year $ 307,504 The City's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the year are as follows: Fiscal Annual Year Ended OPEB Cost Employer Contribution December 31, 2008 $ 439,466 $ 131,962 D. Funded Status and Funding Progress Percentage of Annual OPEB Net OPEB Cost Contributed Obligation 30.0% $ 307,504 As of January 1, 2008, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was zero percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $4,638,477, and the actuarial value of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $4,638,477. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $17,071,318, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 27.2 percent. Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. 41- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the :healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the. plan. and ARCs of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past. expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The, Schedule of Funding Progress immediately following the notes to the basic financial statements presents multi- year trend information about whether the actuarial' value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. E. Actuarial'Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques, that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long -term perspective of the calculations. In the January 1, 2008 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.5 percent investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses) based on the City's own investments; an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 10.0 percent initially, reduced by decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0 percent after ten years. The UAAL is being amortized on a level dollar basis over a closed period. The remaining amortization period at January 1, 2008 was 30 years. Note 9 INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES. AND TRANSFERS The composition of internal balances as of December 31, 2008, is as follows: Receivable Fund HRA Police Special Revenue Debt Service Liquor Aquatic Center Art Center Total Payable. Fund Amount General $ 18,907 Construction 575,000 General 200,000 CDBG 37,000. Construction 150,000 Golf Course 1,100,000 Construction 185,000 Arena 15,000 $ 2,280,907 The City's interfund receivables and payables eliminate what would have been negative cash balances. 57 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 $ 742,800 $ 6,540,785 $ 700,000 $ 170,000 $ 240,000 $ 8,393,585 Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from services provided by another fund. Many of the City's interfund transfers fall under that category. Non - routine transfers include the following: 1. The liquor fund transferred $742,800, $170,000, $135,000 and $80,000 to the general fund, golf course fund, art center, and arena funds, respectively, to subsidize operations. 2. The construction fund transferred $25,000 to the arena fund to subsidize capital improvements to that facility. 3. The HRA fund transferred $6,095,694 of tax increment revenues to the debt service fund to pay principal and interest on outstanding tax increment debt. 4. The general fund, utilities fund, and liquor fund transferred $50,000, $100,000, and $150,000, respectively, to the construction fund to fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2008 budget. 5. The construction fund transferred $445,091 to the debt service fund to pay a portion of the debt service on the gymnasium bonds, and as part of a transaction to record capitalized interest. 6. The general fund transferred $400,000 of the 2007 unreserved and undesignated fund balance to the construction fund according to the City's fund balance policies to fund the capital improvement program. Note 10 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The City of Edina is the administering authority for the following Tax Increment Districts: District number 1200 (501h and France Commercial Area) is a redevelopment district established in 1974 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2009. District number 1201 (Southeast Edina Redevelopment District — Edinborough) is a redevelopment district established in 1977 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2009. District number 1202 (Grandview Commercial Area) is a redevelopment district established in 1984 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2010. 58 Transfer In: Debt Nonmajor General Service Construction Golf Course Business -type Total Transfer out: General Fund $ - $ - $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ 450,000 HRA Fund - 6,095,694 - - - 6,095,694 Construction Fund - 445,091 - - 25,000 470,091 Utilities Fund - - 100,000 - - 100,000 Liquor Fund 742,800 - 150,000 170,000 215,000 1,277,800 $ 742,800 $ 6,540,785 $ 700,000 $ 170,000 $ 240,000 $ 8,393,585 Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from services provided by another fund. Many of the City's interfund transfers fall under that category. Non - routine transfers include the following: 1. The liquor fund transferred $742,800, $170,000, $135,000 and $80,000 to the general fund, golf course fund, art center, and arena funds, respectively, to subsidize operations. 2. The construction fund transferred $25,000 to the arena fund to subsidize capital improvements to that facility. 3. The HRA fund transferred $6,095,694 of tax increment revenues to the debt service fund to pay principal and interest on outstanding tax increment debt. 4. The general fund, utilities fund, and liquor fund transferred $50,000, $100,000, and $150,000, respectively, to the construction fund to fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2008 budget. 5. The construction fund transferred $445,091 to the debt service fund to pay a portion of the debt service on the gymnasium bonds, and as part of a transaction to record capitalized interest. 6. The general fund transferred $400,000 of the 2007 unreserved and undesignated fund balance to the construction fund according to the City's fund balance policies to fund the capital improvement program. Note 10 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The City of Edina is the administering authority for the following Tax Increment Districts: District number 1200 (501h and France Commercial Area) is a redevelopment district established in 1974 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2009. District number 1201 (Southeast Edina Redevelopment District — Edinborough) is a redevelopment district established in 1977 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2009. District number 1202 (Grandview Commercial Area) is a redevelopment district established in 1984 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2010. 58 CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 u District number 1203 (Southeast Edina Redevelopment District Centennial Lakes) is 'a redevelopment district established in 1988 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2016. District number 1207 (701h and Cahill Economic Development District) is- an economic district established.in 1990 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes.with a decertification date of 2000. Increment previously collected is available for expenditures within the larger development district that includes the Wooddale — Valley View commercial area. Tax capacity and debt for this district is not included in the following schedule as county reports no longer indicate captured tax capacity for this district and no debt is outstanding. The following table reflects values as of December 3.1, 2008: TIF #1200:' TIF #1201 TIF #1202. TIF #1203 Total Original tax capacity $ 112,826 $ 94,319 $ : 164,885 $ 229,691 $ 601,721 Current tax capacity 1,614,619 .3,157,281 1,555,070 4,045,888 10,372,858 Tax capacity change 1,501,793 3,062,962 1,390,185 3,816,197 9,771,137 Captured tax capacity value: Retained captured tax capacity $ 1,501,793 $ 3,062,962 $ 1,390,185 $ 3,816,197 $ 9,771,137 Total bonds issued (general obligation) $ 5,360,000 $ 22,445,000 $ 9,637,555 $ 35,'894,724 $ 73,337,279 Amounts redeemed 5,360,000 22,445,000 7,317,555 28,199,724 63,322,279 Outstanding bonds at December 31, 2008 $ $ $ 2,320,000 $ 7,695,000 $ 10,015,000 Note 11 CONTINGENCIES A. RISK MANAGEMENT The City is, exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to and destruction ofassets;.errors and omissions;. injuries to employees; and natural disasters. Worker's compensation insurance is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). The City has a $10,000 deductible per occurrence, with `a $500,000 annual maximum. Automobile and general liability coverage is provided'through an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage and all claims are paid from the plan up to the annual maximum of $600,000. The City is not subject to a deductible for automobile or general liability coverage. Property coverage is also provided by an insurance company: The. City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and all claims are paid for by the plan. The City has $2,500 - $25,000 deductibles per occurrence depending on claim type, with an annual maximum of $83,446,936. 59 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Police professional insurance coverage is provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and has a $10,000 deductible per occurrence, with a $500,000 annual maximum. Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for each of the past three years. There were not significant reductions in insurance coverage during 2008. B. LITIGATION The City attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance; of an immaterial amount; or, in the judgment of the City attorney, remotely recoverable by plaintiffs. C. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreements and is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in the opinion of management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial position of the City at December 31, 2008. D. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The City's tax increment districts are subject to review by the State of Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could become a liability of the applicable fund. Management is not aware of any instances of noncompliance which would have a material effect on the financial statements. Note 12 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATION As of December 31, 2008, the City of Edina had 4 series of Housing and Health Care Revenue Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $31,860,000. The bonds are payable solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. .E :r. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December,31, 2008 Note 13 JOINT VENTURE The City is a participant with the City of Bloomington, the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Airport Commission in a joint venture to construct and operate a facility to be used " for the training of law enforcement,officers and firefighters-The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Association (PSTF) is governed by a Board consisting of one representative from each Member: On dissolution of the. Association, the' Facility shall, revert<to the City of Edina, and all remaining assets shall be divided among the members based on the'CostSharing Formula. In accordance with the joint venture agreement., each member of the association will share. in the cost of the construction and operation based on the Cost Sharing Formula. The City's net investment is reported in the governmental activities capital assets. The City's equity interest in the PSTF was $1,452,465. Complete financial statements for PSTF can be obtained from the City of Edina, 4801 West 50 '. h Street, Edina, MN 55424. Note 14 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The City pays an annual membership.-fee to the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility as part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the Police and Fire departments and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the City paid a total of $35,044 in membership fees to the PSTF. 61 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2008 Note 15 DESIGNATIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF FUND BALANCE At December 31, 2008 the City had designated and reserved portions of its various fund balances through legal restriction and City Council authorization. A summary of such designations and reservations is as follows: Debt Service Fund: Reserved for debt service 3,668,624 Construction Fund: Reserved for encumbrances December 31, 2008 General Fund: 182,207 Reserved for prepaid items $ 13,982 Designated for park dedication 178,295 Designated for investments 11,385 Designated for equipment replacement 2,604,310 Designated for compensated absences 1,404,484 Designated for cash flow 9,473,711 Debt Service Fund: Reserved for debt service 3,668,624 Construction Fund: Reserved for encumbrances 3,400,955 Reserved for special projects 182,207 Reserved for construction projects 1,216,132 Designated for Todd Park assessments 165,000 Designated for capital improvements 4,105,440 $ 26,424,525 Note 15 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On April 29, 2009, the City issued $14,000,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2009A to finance the acquisition and a portion of the rehabilitation of a building to be used as a new public works facility. The interest rate on the bonds ranges from 3.0 -4.4 percent and the final maturity date is February 1, 2030. On April 29, 2009, the City issued $2,240,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009B to finance a current refunding of the 2010 through 2013 maturities of the City's $3,270,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1999B and the 2010 through 2017 maturities of the $4,620,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2001A and to fund the purchase of various capital equipment. The current refundings were undertaken to reduce total debt service payments by $124,874 and resulted in an economic gain of $117,750. 62 Required Supplementary Information CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE- GENERAL FUND For The Year Ended December 31,"2008 Variance with 2008 Final Budget - Budgeted Amounts Actual Over Original Final Amounts (Under) Revenues: General property taxes: Current $ 20,229,404 $ 20,229,404 $ 19,967,819 $ (261,585) Penalties and interest 12,000 12,000 15,476 3,476; Total general property taxes 20,241,404 20,241,404 19;983,295 (258,109) Licenses and permits: 2,715,050 170,731 2,7,15,050 2,885,781 Intergovernmental: Federal: 35,000 35,000 18,937 (16,063) State: Municipal state aid 195,000 195,000 195,000 - Other 50,000 50,000 148,321 98,321 State aid -police 345,000 345,000 342,661 (2,339) Health programs 120,000 120,000 120,130 130 Total intergovernmental 745,000 • 745,000 825,049 80,049 Charges for services: Building Department 300 300 8,761 8,461 City Clerk 5,000 5,000 110,936 105,936 Fire Department 28,000 28,000 21,975 (6,025) Ambulance fees 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,522,637 22,637 Police Department 230,000 230,000 344,171 114,171 Engineering 149,500 149,500 274,965 125,465 Health Department 7,500 7,500 7,080 (420) Planning Department 26,000 26,000 43,290 17,290. Housing Foundation Contract 24,000 24,OOQ 30,533 6,533 HRA Services 20,000 20,000 32,122 12,122 Park Registration 94,000 94,000 98,026 4,026 Senior Center 100,000 100,000 99,259 (741) Other fees 10,000 10,000 2,998 (7,002) 50th & France Assessment 69,000. 69,000 69,000 - Charges to other funds 374.088 374,088 374,088 - o Total charges for - services 2,637,388 2,637,388 3,039 :841 402,453 •.. Fines and forfeits 925,000 43,893 925,000 968,893 Miscellaneous: Rental of property 308,000 308,000 254,437 (53,563) Investment income 275,000 275,000 260,249 (14,751) Donations 10,000 10,000 13,171 3,171 Other 5,000 5,000 5,562 562 Total miscellaneous 598,000 598,000 533,419 (64,581) Total revenues 27,861,842 27,861,842 28,236,278 374,436 63 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Expenditures: General government: Mayor and Council: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total mayor and council Administration: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total administration Planning: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total planning Finance: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total finance Election: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total election Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 45,704 12,305 1,165 31,356 90,530 842,570 189,770 4,780 74,280 1,111,400 6,360 1,117, 760 342,016 68,425 1,900 49,404 461,745 2,010 463,755 500,148 105,600 3,400 59,028 668,176 6,300 674,476 137,235 31,469 18,828 16,536 204,068 $ 45,704 12,305 1,165 31,356 90,530 842,570 189,770 4,780 74,280 1,111,400 6,360 1,117, 760 342,016 68,425 1,900 49,404 461,745 2,010 463,755 500,148 105,600 3,400 59,028 668,176 6,300 674,476 137,235 31,469 18,828 16,536 204,068 204,068 204,068 64 2008 Actual Amounts $ 45,768 6,253 1,181 30,935 84,137 791,145 147,202 1,243 69,051 1,008,641 2,274 1,010,915 350,545 44,415 1,137 46,247 442,344 1,323 443,667 509,076 95,232 2,363 54,605 661,276 2,978 664,254 246,470 12,777 8,311 14,356 281,914 15,319 297,233 Variance with Final Budget - Under (Over) $ (64) 6,052 (16) 421 6,393 51,425 42,568 3,537 5,229 102,759 4,086 106,845 (8,529) 24,010 763 3,157 19,401 687 20,088 (8,928) 10,368 1,037 4,423 6,900 3,322 10,222 (109,235) 18,692 10,517 2,180 (77,846) (15,319) (93,165) . r ` . CITY @FEDmA, MINNESOTA � ' REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ` BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE 'GENERALFUmD(CONONUED) _ For The Year Ended ueoemoe0l.uoou Variance with '- 2008 Final ' ' ' Budgeted Amounts Actual Under � Amounts ~ aauanong� Current: Personal services $ 036.577 $ 636.577 645.048 $ (8,471) - Contractual, services 113.300 ` 113�30O ` 91.967 ^ 21.333 Commodities ' ~3.000 ' �3,OOV 2.872 128 Central uom�eo "" _ '- ' O7U .. Total current 822,249 �822,249 17,660 Cuvum outlay 12,695 l 1,265 ` 11,430 Total assessing 834*44 834S44 8U5O54 29 Legal and couaemiouo: � ' Current: Contractual services 348590 34O5SO 3�1 14Q 27,441 Contingencies: ' Current: Contractual services ' 126.900 126.900 90.328 36.572 Cm/xnvouieu ' ' 1,757 Total. contingencies 126,900 126,900 92,085 34,815 . City's share of special assessment: . Current: ' Contractual oemiceo ^ 30000 30000 30939 83 19 Human Rights Commission: Current: '- Contractual oamicao 90744 90744 101,435 Suburban Rate Authority: - ' '~ Contractual services 4,000 .4000 4000 ' Edina Resource Center Current: . Contractual' 36,113 36,113 ' Human Services Planning &Coordination Current: Contractual services `.' 23,886 23,886 11,943 11,943 Records management: Current: - bohtrocLuo|aami 'o ` 28600 28600 - 28600 - Employee programs Current: Personal services 123,600 123.600 49.417 74.183 ` Contractual services 16600 18800 12,196 4,404 Total employee programs ' 140200 140,200 61,613 78,587 Dial'o-Ride: ' ' Current: , Contractual services 30000 30000 32833 ' , Current: Contractual services ` 10,000 10080 10000 ' Total general government 4,254,566 4,254,566 4,008,176 246,396 = 65 ` CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Public safety: Police protection: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total police protection Fire protection: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total fire protection Civil defense: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total current Capital outlay Total civil defense Animal Control: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total animal control Public health: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total public health Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 6,153,878 381,133 74,933 920,592 7,530,536 265,533 7,796,069 3,622,319 313,650 155,300 318,588 4,409,857 201,247 4,611,104 37,370 9,781 11,758 58,909 5,683 64,592 65,732 8,581 4,174 9,360 87,847 7,534 95,381 268,932 191,712 1,364 35,040 497,048 5,682 502,730 66 $ 6,153,878 381,133 74,933 920,592 7,530,536 265,533 7,796,069 3,622,319 313,650 155,300 318,588 4,409,857 201,247 4,611,104 37,370 9,781 11,758 58,909 5,683 64,592 65,732 8,581 4,174 9,360 87,847 7,534 95,381 268,932 191,712 1,364 35,040 497,048 5,682 2008 Actual Amounts $ 6,283,550 371,267 57,871 904,261 7,616,949 419, 569 8,036,518 3,544,748 324,337 163,150 299,471 4,331,706 89,277 4,420,983 37,370 16,084 2,479 55,933 19,408 75,341 68,616 8,492 904 8,698 86,710 28,800 115,510 242,472 186,384 864 32,960 462,680 908 502,730 463,588 Variance with Final Budget - Under (Over) $ (129,672) 9,866 17,062 16,331 (86,413) (154,036) (240,449) 77,571 (10,687) (7,850) 19,117 78,151 111,970 190,121 (6,303) 9,279 2,976 (13,725) (10,749) (2,884) 89 3,270 662 1,137 (21,266) (20,129) 26,460 5,328 500 2,080 34,368 4,774 39,142 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Inspections: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services, Total current Capital outlay Total inspections Total public safety Public works: Administration: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total administration Engineering: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total engineering, Supervision and overhead: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities' Central services Total supervision and overhead Street maintenance: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total street maintenance Total public works Variance with 2008 Final Budget - Budgeted Amounts Actual Under Original Final Amounts (Over) $ 844,387 $ 844,387 $ 919,507 $ (75120) 62,613 62,613 73,439 (10,826) 81998 8,998 - 7,409 1,589 89,604 89,604 85,126 4,478 1,005,602 1,0051602 1,085,481 (79,879) 22,452 22,452 16,604 5,848 1,028,054 1,028,054 1,102,085 (74,031) 14,097,930 14,097,930 14,214,025 (116,095) 178,079 178,079 173,381 4,698 6,200 6,200 4,784 1,416 500 500 32 468 24,732 24,732 22;981 ` 1,751 209,511 209,511 201,178 8,333 728,405 728,405 802,756 (74,351) 103,650 103,650 161,371 (57,721) 20,100 20,100 10,378 9,722 118,968 118,968 110,786 8,182 971,123 971,123 1,085,291 (114;168) 51,084 51,084 27,885 23,199 1,022,207 1,022,207 1,113,176 (90,969) 203,399 203,399 180,462 22,937 32,000 32,000 27,729 4,271 300 300 - 300 195,468 195,468 174,621 20,847 431,167 431,167 382,812 48,355 1,896,599 1,896,599 1,911,656 (15,057) 701,554 701,554 613,079 88,475 965,490 965,490 998,718 (33,228) 654,264 654,264 653,022 1,242 4,217,907 4,217,907 4,176,475 41,432 519,454 519,454 597,059 (77,605) 4,737,361 4,737,361 4,773,534 (36,173) 6,400,246 6,400,246 6,470,700 (70,454) [:YM CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Parks: Administration: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total administration Recreation: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total recreation Maintenance: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total current Capital outlay Total maintenance Deer control: Current: Personal services Contractual services Total deer control Total parks Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfer from other funds Transfer to other funds Sale of capital assets Total financing sources (uses) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 619,413 32,995 3,500 70,308 726,216 7,088 733,304 192,001 177,897 50,154 420,052 1,526,123 516,873 193,803 330,228 2,567,027 121,517 2,688,544 10,000 10,000 3,851,900 28,604,642 (742,800) 742,800 (50,000) 50,000 742,800 68 $ 619,413 32,995 3,500 70,308 726,216 7,088 733,304 192,001 177,897 50,154 420,052 1,526,123 516,873 193,803 2008 Actual Amounts $ 611,288 24,973 11,818 64,969 713,048 3,861 716,909 172,165 138,056 52,601 362,822 1,540,070 454,980 192,522 330,228 320,122 2,567,027 2,507,694 121,517 51,935 2,688,544 2,559,629 10,000 10,000 11,432 10,070 21,502 Variance with Final Budget - Under (Over) $ 8,125 8,022 (8,318) 5,339 13,168 3,227 16,395 19,836 39,841 (2,447) 57,230 (13,947) 61,893 1,281 10,106 59,333 69,582 128,915 (11,432) (70) (11,502) 3,851,900 3,660,862 191,038 28,604,642 28,353,757 250,885 (742,800) (117,479) 625,321 742,800 (450,000) 50,000 342,800 $ (400,000) 742,800 (450,000) 96,825 389,625 272,146 14,106, 857 $ 14,379,003 46,825 46,825 $ 672,146 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OTHER POST - EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Unfunded Unfunded Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a Valuation Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of Date Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll January 1, 2008 $ 4,638,477 $ - $ 4,638,477 0.0% $ 17,071,318 27.2% .• CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2008 Note A LEGAL COMPLIANCE — BUDGETS The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: 1.. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following. January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and.the means of financing them. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The budget is legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the City Council. 4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year. 5. Budgets for the General Fund and the Community Development Block Grant Fund are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). 6. The, City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between departments. , 7. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council- approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers. 8. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year -end. 71 t CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2008 Note B EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS The General Fund budget is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. The following is a listing of General Fund departments whose expenditures exceed budget appropriations. Final Over Budget Actual Budget General Government: Elections $ 204,068 $ 297,233 $ 93,165 Special assessments 30,000 30,939 939 Human rights 90,744 101,435 10,691 Dial -a -Ride 30,000 32,833 2,833 Public Safety: Police protection 7,796,069 8,036,518 240,449 Civil defense 64,592 75,341 10,749 Animal Control 95,381 115,510 20,129 Inspections 1,028,054 1,102,085 74,031 Public Works: Engineering 1,022,207 1,113,176 90,969 Street maintenance 4,737,361 4,773,534 36,173 Parks: Deer control 10,000 21,502 11,502 Excess expenditures in the elections, special assessments, human rights, dial -a -ride, engineering, and deer control departments are funded by available general fund balance. Excess expenditures in the police protection, civil defense, animal control, and street maintenance departments are by available general fund balance designated for our equipment replacement program. Excess expenditures in the inspections department are funded by greater than anticipated charges for services and license and permit revenue. Excess expenditures of $25,029 in the CDBG fund are due to timing differences between the grant period and the City's fiscal year. All CDBG expenditures are reimbursed by the County. 72 Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Special Revenue Funds A Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. The following are nonmajor special revenue funds: Community Development Block Grant Fund -This fund was established to account for funds, received under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Communications Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received from the franchise fee of the local cable television service. Police Special Revenue Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received for specific purposes within the police department, including E -911 and forfeiture funds. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS December 31, 2008 Community Development Block Grant Assets Communication Police Special Revenue Total Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Cash and cash equivalents $ 835 $ 9,557 $ 3,564 $ 13,956 Investments - 697,400 - 697,400 Accrued interest receivable - 4,577 - 4,577 Accounts receivable - 180,854 - 180,854 Due from other funds - - 575,000 575,000 Due from other governments 43,695 500 - 44,195 Total assets $ 44,530 $ 892,888 $ 578,564 $ 1,515,982 Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 6,967 $ 44,397 $ - $ 51,364 Salaries payable 563 9,300 - 9,863 Due to other funds 37,000 - - 37,000 Unearned revenue - 4,890 - 4,890 Total liabilities 44,530 58,587 - 103,117 Fund balance: Unreserved: Undesignated - 834,301 578,564 1,412,865 Total fund balance - 834,301 578,564 1,412,865 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 44,530 $ 892,888 $ 578,564 $ 1,515,982 74 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Community Total Nonmajor Development Police Special Revenue Block Grant. Communication Special Revenue Funds Revenues: :Franchise fees $ - $ 647,466 $ - $ 647,466 Intergovernmental 1831'985 - 69,193 253,178 Fines and forfeitures - - 104,281 104,281 Investment income > - 62,781 4,118 66,899 Other - 98,326 - 98,326 Total revenues 183,985 808;573 177,592 1,170,150 Expenditures: Current: General government 183,985 661,803 - 845,788 Public safety - - 64,051 64,051 Total expenditures 183,985 661,803 64,051 909,839 Net increase (decrease) in fund balance - 146,770 113,541 260,311 Fund balance - January 1 - 687,531 465,023 1,152,554 Fund balance - December 31 $ - $ 834,301 $ 578,564 $ 1,412,865 75 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Variance with Final budget - Budgeted Amounts Actual Over Original Final Amounts (Under) Revenues: Total revenues $ 158,956 $ 158,956 $ 183,985 $ 25,029 Expenditures: Current: General government Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 158,956 158,956 183,985 25,029 76 NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds account for the financing of self- supporting activities of governmental units which render services to the general public,on a user charge basis. The following are nonmajor enterprise funds: Arena Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the Braemar Ice Arena. Art Center Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the City's Art Center. Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund - This fund accounts for activities at two of the City's parks; Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Park. 77 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS December 31, 2008 Liabilities: Total Nonmajor Current liabilities: Art Edinborough Park Proprietary Accounts payable Arena Center Centennial Lakes Funds Assets 22,030 7,231 44,569 73,830 Current assets: 4,121 - - 4,121 Cash and cash equivalents $ 130 $ 31,510 $ 14,694 $ 46,334 Investments - - 3,936,326 3,936,326 Interest receivable - - 29,962 29,962 Accounts receivable 122,952 - 7,409 130,361 Due from other funds - 15,000 - 15,000 Inventory - 11,436 - 11,436 Total current assets 123,082 57,946 3,988,391 4,169,419 Noncurrent assets: Noncurrent liabilities: Net capital assets 2,502,430 261,110 1,178,967 3,942,507 Total noncurrent assets 2,502,430 261,110 1,178,967 3,942,507 Total assets 2,625,512 319,056 5,167,358 8,111,926 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable 27,365 20,103 265,596 313,064 Salaries payable 22,030 7,231 44,569 73,830 Accrued interest payable 4,121 - - 4,121 Due to other funds 15,000 - - 15,000 Due to other governments 724 753 5,997 7,474 Unearned revenue - 7,222 49,356 56,578 OPEB payable 3,767 1,040 6,167 10,974 Compensated absences payable 53,150 16,744 54,460 124,354 Bonds payable 225,000 - - 225,000 Total current liabilities 351,157 53,093 426,145 830,395 Noncurrent liabilities: Compensated absences 79,724 25,115 81,691 186,530 Total noncurrent liabilities 79,724 25,115 81,691 186,530 Total liabilities 430,881 78,208 507,836 1,016,925 Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 2,277,430 261,110 1,178,967 3,717,507 Unrestricted (82,799) (20,262) 3,480,555 3,377,494 Total net assets $ 2,194,631 $ 240,848 $ 4,659,522 $ 7,095,001 78 - CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN-FUND NET ASSETS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 Total Nonmajor Edinborough Park Proprietary Arena Art Center Centennial Lakes Funds Operating revenues: Sales - retail $ 2,099 $ 40,693 $ - $ 42,792 Sales - concessions 5,986 651 56,643 63,280 " Memberships 31851 27,716 56,051 87,618 Admissions 120,558 - 526,597 647,155 Building rental ` 1,131,385 - 272,711 1,404,096 K Rental of equipment 3,136 - 92,324 95,460 Greens fees - - 177,109 177,109 Class registration & other fees 132,584 382,637 484,487 999,708 Total operating revenues 1,399,599 451,697 1,665,922 3,517,218 • Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 1,036 22,303 54,848 78,187 Personal services 614,747 221,416 1,146,551 1,982,714 Contractual services 671,565 302,066 486,910 1,460,541 Commodities 72,936 51,670 264,006 388,612 Central Services 43,343 36,533 83,355 163,231 Depreciation 286,033 30,206 102,725 418,964 Total operating expenses 1,689,660 664,194 2,138,395 4,492,249 Operating loss (290,061) (212,497) (472,473). (975,031) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income - - 382,007 382,007 Donations - 26,474 - 26,474 Interest and fiscal charges (8,354) - - (8,354) Amortization of bond discount (2,246) - - (2,246) Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) (10,600) 26,474 382,007 397,881 Income (loss) before transfers (300,661) (186,023) (90,466) (577,150) Transfers: Transfers in 105,000 135,000 - 240,000 Total transfers 105,000 135,000 - 240,000 Change in net assets (195,661) (51,023) (90,466) (337,150) Net assets - January 1 .2,390,292 291,871 4,749,988 7,432,151 Net assets - December 31 $ 2,194,631 $ 240,848 $ 4,659,522 $ 7,095,001 79 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31. 2008 Total Nonmajor Art Edinborough Park Proprietary Arena Center Centennial Lakes Funds Cash flows from operating activities: Receipts from customers and users $ 1,419,598 $ 453,400 $ 1,663,455 $ 3,536,453 Payment to suppliers (808,725) (411,513) (683,024) (1,903,262) Payment to employees (594,162) (213,738) (1,116,314) (1,924,214) Donations - 26,474 - 26,474 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 16,711 (145,377) (135,883) (264,549) Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Transfer from other funds 105,000 135,000 - 240,000 Proceeds from interfund borrowing 15,000 - - 15,000 Payment of interfund borrowing - (15,000) - (15,000) Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 120,000 120,000 - 240,000 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of capital assets - - (480,113) (480,113) Principal paid on bonds (220,000) - - (220,000) Interest paid on bonds (11,230) - - (11,230) Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (231,230) - (480,113) (711,343) Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sales of investments - - 352,680 352,680 Investment income - - 247,320 247,320 Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities - - 600,000 600,000 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (94,519) (25,377) (15,996) (135,892) Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 94,649 56,887 30,690 182,226 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $ 130 $ 31,510 $ 14,694 $ 46,334 Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Operating loss $ (290,061) $ (212,497) $ (472,473) $ (975,031) Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation 286,033 30,206 102,725 418,964 Donations - 26,474 - 26,474 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in receivables 19,999 - (2,384) 17,615 Decrease (increase) in inventory - 2,557 - 2,557 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (20,157) (1,396) 205,426 183,873 Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 7,048 2,982 12,938 22,968 Increase (decrease) in due to other governments 312 (102) 669 879 Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue - 1,703 (83) 1,620 Increase (decrease) in OPEB payable 3,767 1,040 6,167 10,974 Increase(decrease)in compensated absences 9,770 3,656 11,132 24,558 Total adjustments 306,772 67,120 336,590 710,482 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 16,711 $ (145,377) $ (135,883) $ (264,549) Noncash investing activities: Increase in fair value of investments $ - $ - $ 132,047 $ 132,047 80 FIDUCIARY FUNDS Agency Funds Agency funds are used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial capacity. The following are agency funds: Police Seizure Fund - This fund accounts for assets seized by the Police Department. Public Safety Training Facility - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, which is a joint venture.that the City has fiduciary responsibilities for. Payroll Fund - This fund accounts for assets withheld from employee paychecks that the City plans to remit to various third parties, including state & local governments, insurance providers, and others. 81 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA $ 9,553 $ 33,137 $ 48,625 295,000 COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 245,000 $ 367,209 $ 9 -553 AGENCYFUNDS 83,137 $ 293,625 $ 61;042 $ 1,716 $ 33,137 For The Year Ended December 31, 2008 29,621 1,593 2,594 - 4,187 304,574 Balance 210 44,967. 259,817 Balance $ 4,520 January 1 78,104 Additions 293,625 Deductions December 31 ,POLICE SEIZURE Assets: Cash $ 21,295 $ 210 $: - $ 21,505 Liabilities: Due to other governmental units $ 2;1,295 $ 210 $ - $ 21,505 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY Assets: Cash $ 3,761 $ 9,343 $ - $ 13,104 Investments 295,000 - 50,000 245,000 Total Assets $ 298,761 $ 9,343 $ 50,000 $ 258,104 Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 13,889 $ 1,716 $ - $ 15,605 Salaries payable 1,593 2,594 - 4,187 Due to other governmental units 283,279 - 44,967 238,312 Total Liabilities $ 298,761 $ 4,310 $ 44,967 $ 258,104 PAYROLL Assets: Cash $ 47,153 $ - $ 33,137 $ 14,016 Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 47;1.53 $ - $ 33,137 $ 14,016 TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS Assets: Cash Investments Total Assets Liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governmental units Total Liabilities $ 72,209 $ 9,553 $ 33,137 $ 48,625 295,000 - 50,000 245,000 $ 367,209 $ 9 -553 $ 83,137 $ 293,625 $ 61;042 $ 1,716 $ 33,137 $ 29,621 1,593 2,594 - 4,187 304,574 210 44,967. 259,817 $ 367,209 $ 4,520 $ 78,104 $ 293,625 83 This page left blank intentionally. 84 r: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TAX CAPACITY, TAX LEVIES AND TAX CAPACITY RATES (shown by year of tax collectibility) Tax capacity rate: General fund revenue Bonds & interest Total tax capacity rate z ° Market value rate 22.536 20.755 1.549 1.858 24.085 22.613 0.00880 0.00703 85 19.636 19.563 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 21.197 22.447 0.00641 0.00601 Total tax capacity $ 91,309,672 $ 10,1,947,912 $ 113,428,895 $ 120,084,430 $ 122,532,149 Increment valuation (_7,330;826) (7,980,069)_ (8,771,951) (9,771,137) (10,307,195) Contribution to fiscal disparities pool (7,635,854) (7,107,862) (8,486,997) (9,358,999) (10,393,526) Tax capacity used for rate calculation 76;342,992 86,859,981 96,169,947 100,954,294 101,831,428 Fiscal disparities distribution 2,374,371 2,411,937 2,595,376 2,895,523 3;298,549 Adjusted net tax capacity $ 78,717,363 $ 89,271,918 $ 98,765,323 $ 103,849,817 $ 105,129,977 Tax levies: General fund $ 17,772,350 $ 18,560,151 $ 19,427,890 $ 20,314,404 $ 21,202,691 Public project revenue 1,058,840 1,501,741 1,497,500 1,240,186 1,220,436 Capital improvement plan - - - 455,641 1,046,403 Certificates of indebtedness 162,200 159,100 - - 84,191 Total certified tax levies 18,993,390 20,220,992 20,925,390 22,010,231 23,553,721 Referendum market value levy 674,161 599,138 605,138 595,438 600,212 Total levy $ 19,667,551 $ 20,820,130 $ 21,530,528 $ 22,605,669 $ 24,153,933 Tax capacity rate: General fund revenue Bonds & interest Total tax capacity rate z ° Market value rate 22.536 20.755 1.549 1.858 24.085 22.613 0.00880 0.00703 85 19.636 19.563 20.204 1.514 1.634 2.243 21.150 21.197 22.447 0.00641 0.00601 0.00597 Supplementary Financial Information CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINED SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS December 31, 2008 General Obligation Bonds: GO Equipment Certificates, Series 2003A 1.05 - 2.40 03/01/03 02/01/08 GO Park & Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 2005A 3.50 - 4.00 07/19/05 02/01 /17 GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series. 2007A 4.00 - 4.25 05/24/07 02/01/28 Total General Obligation Bonds Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: 1,540,000 1,390,000 5,375,000 400,000 5,865,000 - 12,780,000 1,790,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving, 05/03/99 01/01/13 3,270,000 1,300,000 2.25-4.65 Series 2005E 3.00-3.75 09/13/05 Final Prior Years 160,000 Interest 3,600,000 Maturity Original 03/01/03 02/01/13 Rates Date Date . Issue Redeemed Tax Increment Bonds: GO Permanent Improvement Revolving 3.00-4.00 08/28/08 02/01/19 - Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2000A 4.30 - 4:80 09/06/00 02/01/11 $ 2,620,000 $ 1,420,000 Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2002B 3.00% 08/05/02 02/01/12 1,400,000 - Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 20056 Tax Increment Taxable.. Refunding Bonds, 3.00% 07/19/05 02/01/09 10,520,000 .4,200,00 , 0 . Series 2005C_ 3.75-4.25 07/19/05 02/01/09 6,220,000 2,520,000 Tax lncrement'Refunding Bonds, Series 2005D 3.00'- 3.40 07/19/05 02/01/13 3,505;000 460,000 Total Tax Increment Bonds Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 24,265,000 8,600,000 General Obligation Bonds: GO Equipment Certificates, Series 2003A 1.05 - 2.40 03/01/03 02/01/08 GO Park & Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 2005A 3.50 - 4.00 07/19/05 02/01 /17 GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series. 2007A 4.00 - 4.25 05/24/07 02/01/28 Total General Obligation Bonds Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: 1,540,000 1,390,000 5,375,000 400,000 5,865,000 - 12,780,000 1,790,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving, 05/03/99 01/01/13 3,270,000 1,300,000 2.25-4.65 Series 2005E 3.00-3.75 09/13/05 02/01/16 1,460,000 160,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving 3,600,000 2,775,000 1.10 - 3.55 03/01/03 02/01/13 Series 2007C 3.60-4.25 05/24/07 02/01/19 5,870,000 - GO Permanent Improvement Revolving 3.00-4.00 08/28/08 02/01/19 - - Series 2008B 3.00-4.00 08/28/08 02/01/20 - - Total PIR Bonds 7,330,000 160,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds: Public Project, Revenue, Series 2002 4.00 - 5.25 01/01/02 02/01/21 12,410,000 2,260,000 Public Project Revenue, Series 2005 3.00-4.13 09/13/05 05/01/26 5,425,000 185,000 Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 1.7;835,000 2,445,000 Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds,, Series 1999B Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2001A.. Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2003C Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A Total Public Project Revenue Bonds Total - Bonded indebtedness 3.70-4.45 05/03/99 01/01/13 3,270,000 1,300,000 2.25-4.65 11/01/01 01/01/17 4,620,000 2,900,000 3.2 0- 4.20 05/03/99 02/01/09 3,600,000 2,775,000 1.10 - 3.55 03/01/03 02/01/13 3,200,000 1,165,000 4:00% 05/24/07 02/01/17 8,210,000 - 3.00-4.00 08/28/08 02/01/19 - - :. LG,JVV,VVV V, 1'iV,VVV $ 85,110,000 $ 21,135,000 Principal Interest Interest Outstanding 2008 Payable Due Due Payable 12/31/07 Issued Payments 12/31/08 In 2009 In 2009 to Maturity $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 280,000 $ 920,000 $ 290,000 $ 36,678 $ 67,245 1,400,000 - - 1,400,000 - 42,000 147,000 6,320,000 - 3,085,000 3,235,000 3,235,000 48,525 48,525 3,700,000 - 1,815,000 1,885,000 1,885,000 40,056 40,056 3,045,000 - 470,000 2,575,000 480,000 76,977 219,384 15,665,000 - 5,650,000 10,015,000 5,890,000 244,236 522,210 150,000 - 150,000 - - - - 4,975,000 - 420,000 4,555,000 435,000 162,825 831,931 5,865,000 - - 5,865,000 195,000 235,044 2,729,593 10,990,000 - 570,000 10,420,000 630,000 397,869 3,561,524 1,300,000 - 155,000 1,145,000 150,000 37,206 158,947 5,870,000 - - 5,870,000 - 223,243 1,398,914 - 7,755,000 - 7,755,000 - 253,259 2,069,763 7,170,000 7,755,000 155,000 14,770,000 150,000 513,708 3,627,624 10,150,000 - 525,000 9,625,000 550,000 467,812 3,527,387 5,240,000 - 190,000 5,050,000 195,000 197,381 2,066,953 15,390,000 - 715,000 14,675,000 745,000 665,193 5,594,340 1,970,000 - 295,000 1,675,000 310,000 66,580 190,197 1,720,000 - 550,000 1,170,000 550,000 36,578 151,981 825,000 - 405,000 420,000 420,000 8,820 8,820 2,035,000 - 310,000 1,725,000 320,000 51,565 150,698 8,210,000 - 770,000 7,440,000 700,000 283,600 1,417,800 - 13,985,000 - 13,985,000 605,000 459,171 3,219,380 14,760,000 13,985,000 2,330,000 26,415,000 2,905,000 906,314 5,138,876 $ 63,975,000 $ 21,740,000 $ 9,420,000 $ 76,295,000 $10,320,000 $ 2,727,320 $18,444,574 87 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR 50TH & FRANCE -NO. 1200, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (Districts 1200, 1201, 1203 and 1204 are pooled) December 31, 2008 I Accounted_ Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining Source of funds: Bond proceeds $ 2,200,000 $ 5,280,000 $ 5;251;998 $ - $ 28,002 Tax increments received - 31;748,489 24,571,449 1,219,151 5,957,889 Real estate sales * 800,000. 170,782 170,782 - - State aid - 418,871 418,871 - - Special assessments - 1,321,096 728,505 - 592,591 Parking permits - 268,524 268,524 - - Community development, - 186,064 186,064 - - Interest on invested funds - 2,000,000 2,747,172 802 (747,974) Other - 73,881 73,881 - = Total sources of funds: 3,000,000 41,467,707 34,417,246 1,219,953 5,830,508 Uses of funds: Land acquisition - 873,061 873,061 - - Installation of public utilities and improvements 3,000,000 7,867,034 7,862,032 - 5,002 Bond payments: Principal" - 5,280,000 5,360,000 - (80,000) Interest - 4,738,329 4,140,864 - 597,465 Administrative costs - 1,230,000 1,205,451 -. 24,549 Paid to other governments - 21,000 18,982 1,859 159 Work orders - 16,257 16,257 - - Contingencies - 11,644 11,644 - - Interest - 463,037 463,037 - - Miscellaneous - 62,095 63,010 - (915) Transfer - 17,000,000 14,325,000 1,250,000 1,425,000 Total uses of funds: 3,000,000 37,562,457 34,339,338 1,251,859 1,971,260 Funds remaining (deficit) $ - $ 3,905,250 $ 77,908 $ (31,906) $ 3,859,248 Cost to authority Price paid by developer Real estate sales Liquor store site $ 128,064 $ 105,002 Union oil site 134,506 65,780 $ 262,570 $ 170,782 I CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -NO. 1201, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (Districts 1200, 1201, 1203 and 1204 are pooled) December 31, 2008 Source of funds: Bond proceeds Tax increments received Real estate sales Loan proceeds Community development Interest on invested funds Other Total sources of funds: Uses of funds: Land acquisition Installation of public utilities and improvements Site improvements or preparation costs Bond payments: Principal Interest Administrative costs Paid to other governments Transfers out Interest reduction Parkland dedication fees Total uses of funds: Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining $ 6,165,177 $ 21,470,000 $ 20,219,852 $ - $ 1,250,148 - 75,000,000 57,551,878 2,755,049 14,693,073 598,005 3,000,000 2,642,115 - 357,885 - 1,321,096 - - 1,321,096 - 189,221 189,221 - - - 3,500,000 2,665,830 - 834,170 - 50,000 1,357 - 48,643 6,763,182 104,530,317 83,270,253 2,755,049 18,505,015 6,682,998 12,200,000 6,894,303 - 5,305,697 - 16,000,000 14,278,823 - 1,721,177 2,885,484 2,000,000 468,098 - 1,531,902 - 21,470,000 22,445,000 - (975,000) - 20,100,000 19,772,264 - 327,736 194,700 1,800,000 1,673,988 - 126,012 - 110,000 91,949 7,664 10,387 - 22,000,000 16,831,699 2,750,000 2,418,301 - 1,850,000 - - 1,850,000 - 767,852 767,852 - - 9,763,182 98,297,852 83,223,976 2,757,664 12,316,212 Funds remaining (deficit) $ (3,000,000) $ 6,232,465 * Real estate sales Retail site Hotel site Elderly site Office site Coventry Townhouses Cost to authority $ 8,350 192,915 453,740 1,027,277 1,318,103 $ 3,000,385 :• $ 46,277 $ (2,615) $ 6,188,803 Price paid by developer $ 11,899 192,915 346,534 784,563 1,318,103 $ 2,654,014 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -NO. 1202, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2008 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining Source of funds: 5229 Eden Ave. $ 1,822,319 5220 Eden Circle 995,000 Bond. proceeds $ 4,500,000 $ 9,900,000 $ 9',475,915 $. - $ 424,085 Tax increments received - 29,737,107. 13,934,144 1,175,626 14,627,337 Real estate sales * - 4,700,000 5,402,344 - (702,344) Interest on invested funds - 300,000 972,368 42,520. (714,888) Other - - 61,068 - (61,068) Total . sources of funds: 4,500,000 44,637,107 29,845,839 1,218,146 13,573,122 Uses of funds: Land acquisition - 6,500,000 4,060,529 204,887 2,234,584 Installation of public utilities and improvements 4,310,000 17,127,000 9,738,935 - 7,388,065 Bond payments: Principal - 9,900,000 7;037,555 280,000 21582,445 Interest - 9,190,000 3,038,800 91,860 6,059,340 Loan /note interest - - 3,414,416 586,578 (4,000,994) Paid to other governments - - 197,146 1,832 (198,978) Administrative costs 190,000 1,920;107 1,343,678 9,493 566,936 Total uses of funds: 4,500,000 44,637,107 28,831,059 1,174,650 14,631,398 Funds remaining (deficit) $ - $ - $ 1,014,780 $ 43,496 $ (1,058,276) Cost to authority Price paid by developer * Real estate sales 5229 Eden Ave. $ 1,822,319 5220 Eden Circle 995,000 5244 Eden Circle (condemnation deposit) 309,937 5201 Eden Circle 598,411 Project area 23,832 $ 3,749,499 90 2,070,119 4,005,694 $ .6,075,813 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -NO. 1203, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (Districts 1200, 1201, 1203 and 1204 are pooled) December 31, 2008 Source of funds: Bond proceeds Tax increments received Real estate sales * Special assessment Interest on invested funds Transfer in Sale of material Developer payments Other Total sources of funds: Uses of funds: Land acquisition Installation of public utilities and improvements Bond payments: Principal Interest Administrative costs Paid to other governments Loan /note interest Parkland dedication fees Total uses of funds: Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining $ 41,400,000 $ 34,400,000 $ 33,761,677 $ - $ 638,323 80,000,000 90,000,000 34,770,098 3,428,608 51,801,294 5,000,000 11,637,070 11,637,070 - - - 1,321,096 - - 1,321,096 - 2,500,000 3,504,388 343,516 (1,347,904) - 40,000,000 32,267,924 4,000,000 3,732,076 - 255,710 255,710 - - - 297,826 297,826 - - - 20,000 21,799 - (1,799) 126,400,000 180,431,702 116,516,492 7,772,124 56,143,086 13,900,000 26,677,000 22,981,425 25,871,230 22,981,425 16,688,430 2,070,016 7,112,784 41,400,000 41,400,000 22,829,724 5,370,000 13,200,276 38,000,000 38,000,000 33,635,357 353,834 4,010,809 1,140,800 1,600,000 1,326,749 26,163 247,088 - 42,000 33,126 3,632 5,242 - 14,684,711 4,458,855 557,860 9,667,996 - 2,030,345 2,030,345 - - 121,117,800 146,609,711 103,984,011 8,381,505 34,244,195 Funds remaining (deficit) $ 5,282,200 $ 33,821,991 $ 12,532,481 $ (609,381) $ 21,898,891 Cost to authority Price paid by developer * Real estate sales Retail and theater site $ 3,213,720 Medical office site 815,092 Office site 1,107,160 Office building #1 449,300 Office building #2 1,280,702 Office building #3 1,341,533 Office building #4 1,625,849 Office building #5 1,803,714 $ 11,637,070 91 $ 3,213,720 815,092 1,107,160 449,300 1,280,702 1,341,533 1,625,849 1,803,714 $ 11,637,070 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR 70TH STREET AND CAHILL ROAD DISTRICT -NO. 1207, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2008 ,, Accounted Original Amended for-in Current Amount Budget Budget prior. years year remaining Source of funds: Bond proceeds $ 1,911,000 $ 1,911,000 $ - $ - $ 1,911,000 Tax increments received 2,177,855 2,177,855 .746,863 - 1,430,992 Interest on invested funds - - 225,305 17,178 (242,483) Total sources of funds: 4,088,855 4,088;855 972,168 17,178 31099,509 Uses of funds: Land acquisition 529,400 529,400 .37,861 2,107 489,432 Installation of public utilities and improvements 325,000 325,000 54.0,279 - (215,279) Demolition 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 Relocation 160,000 160,000 - - 160,000 Capitalized interest 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 Debt service 2,178,455 2,178,455 - - 2,178,455 Paid to other governments - - 2,730 - (2,730) Administrative costs 596,000 596,000 74,830 - 521,170 Total uses of funds: 4,088,855 4,088,855 655,700 2,107 3,431,048 Funds remaining (deficit) $ - $ - $ 316,468 $ 15,071 $ (331,539) ,, Statistical Section STATISTICAL SECTION This part of the City's comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, ':note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City's overall financial health. Contents Page Financial Trends 94 These schedules` contain, trend information to, help the reader understand how the City's financial performance and well -being have changed over time. Revenue Capacity 100 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City's most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Debt Capacity 104 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess -the affordability of the City's current levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information 109 These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take place. Operating Information 111. These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City's financial report relates to the services. the City provides and the activities it performs. Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year. The City implemented GASB - Statement 34 in 2003; schedules presenting government -wide information include information beginning in that year. 93 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NET ASSETS BY COMPONENT LAST SIX FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Business -type activities Fiscal Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Governmental activities net of related debt $ 29,952,549 $ 37,240,476 $ 40,044,169 Invested in capital assets, $ 43,046,160 $ 46,851,736 Restricted 1,672,828 - net of related debt $ 21,792,377 $ 34,320,784 $ 36,092,020 $ 69,814,012 $ 67,680,882 $ 71,601,227 Restricted 4,676,748 2,145,488 78,943 - - 3,362,446 Unrestricted 31,876,783 28,762,040 35,796,801 15,280,058 25,136,312 29,577,462 Total governmental activities $ 46,969,851 $ 49,174,972 $ 51,165,889 $ 53,361,270 $ 56,695,515 net assets $ 58,345,908 $ 65,228,312 $ 71,967,764 $ 85,094,070 $ 92,817,194 $ 104,541,135 Business -type activities Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 29,952,549 $ 37,240,476 $ 40,044,169 $ 46,981,755 $ 43,046,160 $ 46,851,736 Restricted 1,672,828 - - - - 954,486 Unrestricted 15,344,474 11,934,496 11,121,720 6,379,515 13,649,355 12,071,776 Total business -type activities net assets $ 46,969,851 $ 49,174,972 $ 51,165,889 $ 53,361,270 $ 56,695,515 $ 59,877,998 Primary government Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 51,744,926 $ 71,561,260 $ 76,136,189 $ 116,795,767 $ 110,727,042 $ 118,452,963 Restricted 6,349,576 2,145,488 78,943 - - 4,316,932 Unrestricted 47,221,257 40,696,536 46,918,521 21,659,573 38,785,667 41,649,238 Total primary government net assets $ 105,315,759 $ 114,403,284 $ 123,133,653 $ 138,455,340 $ 149,512,709 $ 164,419,133 94 95 CITY-OF- EDINA- MINNESOTA CHANGES IN NET ASSETS LAST SIX FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2003 2004 i2005 2006 2007 2008 .r Expenses Governmental activities: General government $ 5,839,893 $ 6,934,045 $ 4,967,008 $ ;51414,961. $ 7,039,298 $ 6,836,248 'Public safety 10,784,215 11,063,767 12;019;027 13,300,351 13,743,194 14,833,647 Public works 5,621;291 5,834,490 7,185,784 8,973,031 8,757;022 91046;873 • Parks 4;484,685 4,248,060 5;901,,648 5,341,682 5,025,560 5,971,565 Interest on long -term debt 2,760,022 2,399,682 2,288,524 2,973,749 1,887,633 1,923,821 Total governmental activities expenses 29,490,106 30,480,044 32,361,991 36,003,774 36,452;707 38,612,154 Business -type activities: ,,.. Utilities 7,930,502 7,801,580 81254,409 9,234,651 10,036,844 10,625181,1 Liquor 8;764,081 9,110,888 9,749,313 9,968,963 10,361,998 11,049,223 Aquatic center 711,061 701,768 725,936 795,614 780,981 787,663 Golf course 3,555,243 3508,741 3,580,307 3,652,169 3,621,977 3,612;482 Community activity centers 3,833,026 .3,850,192 3,825,562 4,048,649 4,168,534 .4,502,849 Total business -type activities expenses 24,793,913 24,973,169 26,135,527 27,700,046 28,970,334 30,578,028 Total primary government expenses $ 54,284,019 $ 55,453,213 $ 58,497,518 $ 63,703,820 $ 65,423,041 $ 69,190,182 Program Revenues Governmental activities: Charges for services: General government $ 930,391 $ 454,603 $ 619,526 $ ; 731,613 $ 784,659 $ 840,070 Public safety 4,213,081 4,634,744 5,614,406 6,146,114 5,632,642 5,839,683 Other activities 898,141 748,398 630,157 793,796 736,329 763,130 Operating grants and contributions 1,215,745 1,154,808 1,512,366 1,423,302 1,384,024 1,170,183 Capital grants and contributions 7,214,393 4,192,947 2,252,491 4,013,617 4,299,509 7,710,015 Total governmental activities program revenue 14,471,751 11,185,500 10,628,946 13,108,442 12,837,163 16,323,081 Business -type activities: Charges for services: Utilities 9,694,981 9,875,078 10,240,381 11,421,474 13,125,773 13,713,249 Liquor 9,659,631 10,030,067 10,752,724 ,- 11,029,445 11,436,175 12,122,599 Aquatic center 861,340 764,134 849,380 867,626 868,833 925,388 Golf course 3,684,079 3,538,122 3,482,999 3,646,620 3,630,538 3,680,584 Community activity centers 2,966,731 3,254,012 3,251,860 3,337,153 3,517,111 3,517,218 Operating grants and contributions 132,031 138,447 131,408 122,358 127,492 147,456 Total business -type activities program revenue 26,998,793 27,599,860 28,708,752 30,424,676 32,705,922 34,106,494 Total primary government program revenues $ 41,470,544 $ 38;785,360 $ 39,337,698 $ 43,533,118 $ 45;543,085 $ 50,429,575 Net Governmental activities $(15,018,355) $(19,294,544) $(21,733,045) $(22,895,332) $(23,615,544) $(22,289,073) Business -type activities 2,204,880 2,626,691 2,573,225 2,724,630 3,735,588 3,528,466 Total primary government net expense $(12,813,475) $(16,667,853) $(19,159,820) $(20,170,702) $(19,879,956) $(18,760,607) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Assets Governmental activities: Property taxes $ 17,815',426 $ 17,865,757 $ 19,071,202 $ 20,414,298 $ 21,459,001 $ 22,242,276 Tax increment collections 7,342,270 6,761,934 7,060,744 7,228,002 7,793,577 8,578,434 Franchise taxes - 450,956 457,421 499,206 570,871 647,466 Unrestricted investment earnings 286,209 443,074 977,956 1,230,264 1,581,702 1,185,899 Gain on disposal of capital assets 26,669 - 63,674 8,418 58,377 1,265 Transfers (4,053;805) 655,227 841,500 838,230 919,625 967,800 " Total governmental activities 21,416,769 26,176,948 28,472,497 30,218,418 32,383,153 33,623,140 Business -type activities: Unrestricted investment earnings 387,117 227,167 236,654 283,771 510,678 607,312- Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets (177,051) 6,490 22,538 25,210 7,604 14,505 Transfers 4,053,805 (656,227) (841,500)" (838,230) (919,625) (967,800) Total business -type activities 4,263,871 (421,570) (582,308) (529,249) (401,343) (345,983) Total primary government $ 25,680,640 $ 25,755,378 $ 27,890;189 $ 29,689,169 $.31,981,810 $ 33,277,157 Change in Net Assets Governmental activities $ 6,398,414 $ 6,882,404 $ 6;739,452 $ 7,323,086 $ 8,767,609 $ 11,334,067 Business -type activities 6,468,751 2,205,121 1,990,917 2,195,381 3,334,245 3,182,483 Total primary government $ 12;867,165 $ 9,087,525 $ 8,730,369 $ 9,518;467 $ 12,101,854 $ 14,516,550 95 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) General fund Reserved Unreserved Total general fund All other governmental funds Reserved Unreserved, reported in: Special revenue funds Capital projects funds Total all other governmental funds Fiscal Year 1999 2000a 2001 2002 $ 2,407,155 $ 141,939 $ 15,872 $ 417,093 10,051,978 13,755,160 14,359,821 14,325,972 $ 12,459,133 $ 13,897,099 $ 14,375,693 $ 14,743,065 $ 496,581 $ 16,729,995 $ 2,319,839 $ 4,186,436 942,791 1,147,917 1,435,949 1,589,518 18,216,440 22,454,859 22,869,578 26,750,351 $ 19,655,812 $ 40,332,771 $ 26,625,366 $ 32,526,305 a The substantial increase in reserved fund balance in 2000 is due to a crossover refunding bond issue that was outstanding as of December 31, 2000. The substantial decrease in unreserved fund balance in 2003 is due to the transfer of investment assets to the Edinborough Park/Centennial Lakes enterprise fund. The substantial increase in reserved fund balance in 2005 is due to two crossover refunding bond issues that were outstanding as of December 31, 2005. 97 Fiscal Year 2003b 2004 2065° 2006 2007 .2008 $ 412,991 $ . 390,771 $ 223,351 $ 36,849 $ - . 28;637 $ 13,982 9,961`,074 10,226,055 11,595,433 13,797,189 14,078,220 14,365,021 $ 10,374,065 $ 10,616,826 $ 11,818,784 $ 13,834,038 $.14,106,857 $14,3 79,003 $ 4,084,987 $ 3,465,440 $ 13,792,312 $ 2,682,238 $ 6,247,539 $ 8,467,918 686,777 781,458 731,027 13,179,904 14,750,448 14,950,538 19,608,849 16,651,788 17,032,750 3,160,085 5,853,322 4,2701440 $ 24,380,613 $ 20,898,686 $ 31,556,089 $ 19,022,227 $ 26,851,309 $ 27,688,896 97 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) Expenditures General government 3,899,660 Fiscal Year 5,353,002 5,372,431 1999 2000 2001 2002 Revenues Public works 3,744,124 3,672,057 4,313,065 General property taxes $ 21,995,230 $ 22,904,512 $ 24,409,785 $ 24,735,336 Tax increment collections - - _ _ Special assessments 990,330 1,159,876 1,086,093 998,908 Franchise fees 297,866 336,678 473,702 418,153 License and permits 2,135,541 1,835,828 2,239,611 1,939,207 Intergovernmental 3,185,008 1,880,680 5,085,981 2,254,968 Charges for services 3,215,441 2,902,666 1,962,172 2,096,806 Fines and forfeitures 794,710 967,421 976,952 910,407 Investment income 415,114 2,376,137 1,357,701 1,178,211 Rental of property 284,085 1,156,526 4,262,984 1,782,063 Other revenues 478,788 96,932 184,466 180,081 Total revenues 33,792,113 35,617,256 42,039,447 36,494,140 Expenditures General government 3,899,660 4,558,424 5,353,002 5,372,431 Public safety 8,516,673 8,846,360 9,409,291 9,893,428 Public works 3,744,124 3,672,057 4,313,065 4,161,373 Parks 2,240,730 2,150,588 2,375,565 2,602,266 Capital outlay 6,117,215 8,352,494 11,193,155 11,059,757 Debt service Principal 3,275,000 6,050,000 3,740,000 5,885,000 Interest and other charges 3,262,266 3,108,601 3,148,719 3,094,480 Total expenditures 31,055,668 36,738,524 39,532,797 42,068,735 Revenues over (under) expenditures 2,736,445 (1,121,268) 2,506,650 (5,574,595) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in 5,983,107 6,976,639 6,215,411 12,308,480 Transfers out (6,006,107) (6,165,639) (6,201,152) (11,552,990) Parkland dedication 264,424 85,520 60,280 - Sale of capital assets - _ _ _ Bonds issued - 21,742,116 - 13,637,416 Premium on bonds issued - - _ _ Discount on bonds issued - - Refunding bonds issued - _ Payment to refunding escrow - - (15,810,000) (2,550,000) Principal paid by escrow - _ _ _ Total other financing sources (uses) 241,424 22,638,636 (15,735,461) 11,842,906 Net change in fund balances $ 2,977,869 $ 21,517,368 $ (13,228,811) $ 6,268,311 Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures 26.2% 32.3% 24.3 % 29.0% a The substantial change in debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures in 2007 is due to a change in the way this ratio is calculated. The City did not recalculate previously reported ratios. 98 Fiscal Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007a 2008 $ 17,903,618 $ 17,865,757 $ 19,071,202 $ 20,414,298 $ 21,459;001 $ 22,242,276 7,342,270 6,761,934 7,060,744 7,228,002 7,793,577 8,578,434 ' 1,019,461 966;879 1,354,264 1,751,219 1,750,444 2,442,490 393,627 450,956 457,421 499,206 570,871 647,466 2,182,263 2,247,759 3,240,622 3,488,897 2,909;521 2,91.5,455 4,678,735 3,933,540 1,539,169 2,773,350 3,699,006 3,005;883 2,076,519 2,279,302 2,466,663 2,691,354 2,748,709 3,093,941 785,227 863,073 742,917 1,023,935 971,486 1, 073,174 286,209 443,074 977,956 1,230,264 1,581,702 1,185,899 354,266 385,707 315,542 310,145 355,734 255,607 200,551 294,136 227,446 246,797 225,839 126,723 37,222,746 36,492,117 37,453,946 41,657,467 44,065,890 45,567,348 5,709,741 5,213,469 5,477,308 5,995,804 6,544,307 6,235,352 10,352,816 11,125,388 11,373,763 12,431,114 12,985,215 13, 788,797 4,142,668 4,386,669 4,882,811 5,233,907 5,787,61.9 6,189,594 2,974,164 2,954,372 3,146,029 3,300,375 3,455,789 3,693,595 . 15,539,676 7,772,321 8,227,191 8,980,526 11,991,122 14,666,907 5,700,000 6,450,000 6,830,000 5,985,000 6,190,000 7,090,000 2,908,787 2,484,291 2,543,639 2,107,036 1,677,770 1,967,021 47,327,852 40,386,510 42,480,741 44,033,762 48,631,822 53,631,266 (10, 1 d5,106) (3,894,393) (5,026,795) (2,376,295) (4,565,932) (8,063,918) - 8,752,126 8,367,595 7,797,369 6,865,258 7,290,391 7,983,585 (12,805,931) (7,712,368). (6,955,869) (6,027,028) (6,370,766) (7,015,785) - - 135,045 54,457 66,845 96,825 1,540,000 - 15,816,165 - 11,735,000 7,755,000 59,219 - - (36,275) - (53,637) (35,848) 6,670,000 - 16,764,721 - - - (6,525,000) - (16,635,000) - - - - - - (9,035,000) - - (2,409,586) 655,227 16,886,156 (8;142,313) 12,667,833 8;783,777 $''(12,514,692) $ (3,239,166) $ : 11,859,361 $ (10,518,608) $ 8,101,901 $ 719,859 27.1% 27.4% 27.4% 23.1% 20.9% 22.6% ,, . 99 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ASSESSED VALUE, ACTUAL VALUE AND TAX CAPACITY OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 1999 -2004 estimated market values obtained from previous CAFRs and do not include personal property. DNA: Historical data is not available a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification. b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity (see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate "). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only. The State of Minnesota passed property tax reform legislation that significantly reduced tax capacity in 2002. 100 Market Value (In Thousands)' Tax Capacity (In Thousands) City Tax City Estimated Fiscal Used Adjusted Capacity Referendum Direct Year Estimated Limited Taxable Total for Rate Net Rate Rate Rate b 1999 $ 4,267,759 DNA DNA $ 85,964 $ 72,221 $ 74,421 17.810% 0.01704% $3.106 2000 4,535,762 DNA DNA 90,807 74,705 77,166 17.669% 0.01634% 3.006 2001 4,861,730 DNA DNA 99,650 80,964 83,716 17.233% 0.01495% 2.967 2002 5,821,567 DNA DNA 72,584 ` 59,176 ` 61,007 ° 27.806 %` 0.01200% 2.914 2003 6,328,581 DNA DNA 77,666 63,169 65,145 27.139% 0.01100% 2.794 2004 6,909,477 DNA DNA 83,448 68,553 70,756 25.565% 0.01000% 2.618 2005 8,052,704 $ 7,674,983 $ 7,668,117 91,310 76,343 78,717 24.085% 0.00880% 2.354 2006 8,713,166 8,541,954 8,536,086 101,948 86,860 89,272 22.613% 0.00703% 2.317 2007 9,619,356 9,456,650 9,451,668 113,429 96,170 98,765 21.150% 0.00641% 2.172 2008 9,986,738 9,933,166 9,928,907 120,084 100,954 103,850 21.197% 0.00601% 2.204 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 1999 -2004 estimated market values obtained from previous CAFRs and do not include personal property. DNA: Historical data is not available a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification. b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity (see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate "). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only. The State of Minnesota passed property tax reform legislation that significantly reduced tax capacity in 2002. 100 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX CAPACITY RATES LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. Some 1999 -2004 data obtained from previous CAFR's. RMV: Referendum Market .Value DNA: Historical data is not available Geographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit, Hennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City, Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates. a The State of Minnesota passed property tax reform legislation that significantly reduced tax capacity in 2002. At the same time, the state took on greater responsibility for school district funding. . 101" City Rates Overlapping Rates Total Fiscal Basic Debt Total Tax ISD #273 Edina Direct & Year Rate Rate Capacity RMV Hennepin Tax Cap. RMV' Other Overlap 1999 DNA DNA 17.810% 0.017% 40.994% 50.766,, % DNA 8.5530% 118.123% 2000 DNA DNA 17.669% 0.016% 39.655% 51.678% DNA .8.426% 117.428% 2001 DNA DNA 17.233% 0.015% 37.624% 46.839% DNA 8.126% 109.822% 2002 26.116% 1.690% 27.806% a 0.012% 50.409% a 18.504% a DNA 9.847.% 106.566% 2003 24.586% 2.553% 27.139% 0.011 % 50.607% 21312% DNA 87993% 110.051% 2004 23.183% 2.382% 25.565% 0.010% 47.324% 22.670% DNA 8.256% 103.815% 2005' 22.536% 1.549% 24.085% 0.009% 44.172% 19.694% 0.166% 8.547% 96.498% 2006 20.755% 1.858% 22.613% 0.007% 41.016% 19.226% 0.154% 8.104% . 90.959% 2007 19.636% 1.514% 21.150% 0.006% 39.110% 18.244% 0.147% 8.417% 66.921% 2008 19.563% 1.634% 21.197% 0.006% 38.571% 16.951% 0.177% 8.546% 85.265% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. Some 1999 -2004 data obtained from previous CAFR's. RMV: Referendum Market .Value DNA: Historical data is not available Geographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit, Hennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City, Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates. a The State of Minnesota passed property tax reform legislation that significantly reduced tax capacity in 2002. At the same time, the state took on greater responsibility for school district funding. . 101" CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAX PAYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO Taxpayer 2008 Percentage of Total Tax Capacity Rank Capacity 1999 Percentage of Total Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Southdale Shopping Center $ 3,497,098 1 2.91% $ 4,611,142 1 5.36% Galleria Shopping Center 1,300,806 2 1.08% 1,492,290 2 1.74% Centennial Lakes Retail 926,094 3 0.77% 602,989 9 0.70% Southdale Office Park 910,362 4 0.76% 1,359,207 4 1.58% Centennial Lakes Phase V 756,518 5 0.63% - 0.00% Centennial Lakes Phase IV 741,842 6 0.62% - 0.00% National Car 631,752 7 0.53% 721,112 6 0.84% Macy's Department Stores 520,174 8 0.43% - 0.00% Target 510,186 9 0.42% - 0.00% Centennial Lakes Medical Bldg 483,056 10 0.40% - 0.00% Southdale Medical Bldg - 0.00% 703,241 7 0.82% Pentagon Office Park - 0.00% 1,430,899 3 1.66% United Healthcare Corporation - 0.00% 777,108 5 0.90% Cedars of Edina - 0.00% 645,854 8 0.75% Edinborough Plaza - 0.00% 441,502 10 0.51% Totals $10,277,888 8.56% $12,785,344 14.87% Source: City of Edina Assessing Office 102 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Collected within the Total Fiscal Year of the Levy Collections in Total Collections to Date Taxes Tax Percentage Subsequent Percentage Payable Levy Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy 1999 $ 14,012,337 $ 13,868,630 :98.97% $ 81,173 $ 13,949,803 99.55% 2000 14,391,078 14,290,698 99.30% 91,042 14,381,740 99.94% ._ 2001 15,165,091 15,053,569 99.26% 100,594 15,154,163 99.93% '2002 17,728,603 16,985,098 a 95.81% a 85,589 17,070,687 96.29% 2003 18,506,442 17,808,469 96.23% 50,633 17,859,102 96.50% 2004 18,808,903 18,066,892 96.06% 104,651 18,171,543 96.61% 2005 19,667,551 19,090,016 97.06% 118,292 19,208,308 97.66% 2006 20,820,130 20,310,889 97.55% 157,779 20,468,668 98.31% 2007 21,530,528 21,347,789 b 99.15% b 58,800 21,406,589 99.42% 2008 22,605,669 22,178,719 ° 98.11% ° - 22,178,719 98.11% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. a Beginning in 2002, the State of Minnesota quit reimbursing the City for the homestead market value credit (HMVC) program. The HMVC program reduces property taxes for certain residential properties and is phased out once a property reaches a certain assessed value. The program is designed so the State "pays" the amount property taxes were reduced by to local governments'. When the State ended reimbursing the City for HMVC in 2002, tax collections as a percent of levy dropped, as shown in this table. Due to the phase out provision in the HMVC program, the City anticipates that the impact of this lost revenue will decrease over time as property values rise above the phase out level. b In 2007 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for HMVC after five years of not making payments. In 2008 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for only 50% of HMVC. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands, except per capita) Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. 104 Total Percentage Governmental Activities Primary Business -Type Activities Government General Public Tax Permanent Rec. Utility Fiscal Obligation Project Increment Improvement Facility Revenue Year Debt Revenue Bonds Revolving Bonds Bonds 1999 $ 7,825 $ - $ 50,260 $ 350 $ 10,970 $ 3,600 2000 7,550 - 66,670 170 10,520 3,265 2001 7,250 - 47,590 - 14,670 2,955 2002 6,950 12,410 40,855 - 7,890 2,630 2003 8,165 12,035 35,900 - 7,145 5,495 2004 7,295 11,595 30,760 - 6,325 4,860 2005 11,765 16,560 28,905 1,460 5,475 4,215 2006 5,670 16,080 20,460 1,460 4,595 3,550 2007 10,990 15,390 15,665 7,170 3,690 11,070 2008 10,420 14,675 10,015 14,770 2,845 23,570 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. 104 Total Percentage Primary of Personal Per Government Income Capita $ 73,005 4.48% $ 1,546 88,175 5.05% 1,859 72,465 4.08% 1,527 70,735 3.94% 1,490 68,740 3.72% 1,445 60,835 3.09% 1,263 68,380 3.39% 1,441 51,815 2.50% 1,105 63,975 3.07% 1,359 76,295 3.66% 1,620 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands, except per capita) General. Bonded Debt General Public Tax Percentage Fiscal Obligation Project Increment of Property Per Year Debt Revenue Bonds: Total Value a Capita 1999 $ 7,825 $ - $ 50,260 $ 58,085 1.36% $ 1,230 2000 . 7,550 - 66,670_ 74,220 1.64% 1,565 2001 7;250 - 47,590 54,840 1.13 % 1,155 2002 6,950 12,410 40,855 60,215 1.03% 1,269 2003 8,165 12,035 35,900 56,100 0.89% 1,179 2004 7,295 11,595 30,760 49,650 0.72% 1,031 2005 11,765 161560 28,905 57,230 0.71% 1,206 2006 5,670 16,080 20,460 42,210 .0.48% 900 2007 10,990 15,390 15,665 42,045 0.44% 893 2008 10,420 14,675 10,015 35,110 0.35% 746 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. ,, .. a See statistical schedule titled "Asse'ssed Value, Actual.Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for estimated property value data. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 Net General Percentage Obligation Bonded Applicable City Share Debt Outstanding a in City b of Debt Overlapping Debt: Hennepin County $ 501,975,359 6.96% $ 34,937,485 Hennepin Suburban Park District 72,794,815 9.21% 6,704,402 Hennepin Regional Rail Authority 43,486,862 6.96% 3,026,686 School Districts: ISD No. 273 (Edina) 88,490,000 98.39% 87,065,311 ISD No. 270 (Hopkins) 129,319,767 8.65% 11,186,160 ISD No. 271 (Bloomington) 100,558,951 0.00% - ISD No. 272 (Eden Prairie) 74,180,000 0.90% 667,620 ISD No. 280 (Richfield) 17,212,064 15.94% 2,743,603 ISD No. 283 (St. Louis Park) 81,340,045 0.02% 16,268 Metro Council 137,904,653 3.14% 4,330,206 Total Overlapping Debt 1,247,262,516 150,677,741 Direct Debt: City of Edina 19,547,394 100.00% 19,547,394 Total Overlapping and Direct Debt $ 1,266,809,910 $ 170,225,135 Debt Ratios: Ratio of debt per capita (47,090 population) $ 3,615 Ratio of debt to estimated market valuation of $9,986,737,500 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services a Calculation excludes revenue and special assessment bonds as well as sinking fund balance, if any. b The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's tax capacity that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total tax capacity. 106 1.70% CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands) Fiscal Year 1999 ' 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008a Debt limit $ 90,715 $ 97,235 $ 116,431 $ 138,279 $ 138,190 $ 160,674 $ 173,867 $ 191,974 $ 199,775 $ 302,385 Total net debt applicable to limit 7,825 7,550 7,250 19,360 20,200 18,890 29,785 21,750 26,380 25,095 Legal debt margin $ 82,890 $ 89,685 $ 109,181 $ 118,919 $ 117,990 $ 141,784 $ 144,082 $ 170,224 1 173,395 $ 277,290 Total net debt applicable to the limit as a percentage of debt limit 8.63% 7.76% 6.23% 14.00% 14.62% 11.76% 17.13% 11.33% 13.20% 8.30% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2008 Market value (after fiscal disparities) $ 10,079,498,900 Debt limit (3% of market value) 302,384,967 Debt applicable to limit: General obligation bonds 10,420,000 Public project revenue bonds 14,675,000 Total debt applicable to limit 25,095,000 Legal debt margin $ 277,289,967 a The State of Minnesota changed the legal debt limit from 2% of taxable market value to 3% during 2008. 107 108 Fiscal Less: operating Net available Debt service requirements Year Revenue expenses revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage Public Project Revenue Bonds (Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue) 2003 $ 1,026,437 $ $ 375,000 $ 15,000 $ 3.:90,000 2.63 2004 1,028,837 .1,026,437 1,028,837 440,000 557,636 997,636 1.03 2005 -1,058,840 1,058,840 460,000 558,486 1,016,486 2006 1,501,741 1,501,741 480,000 779,778 1,259,778 1.19 2007 1,497,500 1,497,500 690;000 725;855 1,415,858 1.06 2008 1,425,186 1,425,186 715,000 696,118 1,411,118 1.01 Tax Increment Bonds 1999 8,084,657 - 8,084,657 2,830,000 2,797,897 5i627,897 1:44 2000 8,590,313 - 8,590,313 5,595,000 2,677,383 8,272;383 1.04 2001 9,309,360 - 9,309,360 3,270.000 3,205,971 6,475,971 1.44 2002 7;053,836 - 7,053,836 4,570,000 2,355,928 6,925,928 1.02 2003 7,342,270 - 7,342,270 5,000,000 1,889,329 6;889,329 1.07 2004 6,761,934 - 6,761,934 5,140,000 1,520,376 6,660,376 1.02 2005 7,060,744, - 7,060,744 5,465,000 1,327,983 6,792,983 1.04 2006, 7,228,002 7,228,002 8,445,000 902,607 9,347,607 0.77 2007 7,793,577 - 7,793,577 4,795,000 625,606 5,420,606 1.44 2008, 8,578,434 - 8,578,434 5,650,000 445,694 6,095,694 1.41 Permanent Improvement Revolving Bonds (Spe6lal Assessment) 1 1 . . 1 1499 855,137 855;137 180,000 22,250 202,250 4.23 mod 721,871 721,871 .180,000 13,340 193_1340 3.73 2001 684,660 - 684,660 170,000. 4,420 174,420 3.93 2006 85,656 - 85,656 • - 43,366. 43,366 1.98 2007 391,921 - 391,921 166"000 46,694 206,694 1.96 2008 564,534 - 564,534 155,000 306,759 461,759 1.22 Utility: Bond 1999 .8,502,423 6,713,673 1,788,750 420,000 83,429 503,429 3.55 2000 8,793,386 7,205,934 1,587,452 335,000 127,525 462,525 3.43 2001 :8,556,810 7,065,589 1,491,221 310,000 116,794 426,794 3.49 2002 8,561,287 7,399,773 1,161,514 325,000 105,205 430,205 2.70 2003 9,668,434 7,769,810 1,898,624 335,000 160,691 495,691 3.83 2004 9,473,355 7,643,129 1,830,226 635;000 158,451 793,451 2.31 2005 . 8,107,039 2,118,936 645,000 141,226 786,226 2.70 2006 11,416,361 9,107,143 2,309,218 665,000 129,608 794,608 2.91 2007 13,125,419 9,735,839 3,389,580 690,000 108,840 798,840, 4.24 2008 13,544,728 10,076,422 3,468,306 1,485,000 459,983 1,944,983 1.78 Recreational Facility Bonds 1999 5,141,606 4,332,932 808,674 .430,000 522,050 952,050 0.85 2000 5,727,930 5,209,610 518,320 450,000 553,962 1,003,962 0.52 5,430,507 5,231,143 199,364 470,000 531,176 1,001,176 0.20 2002 5,424,422 5,031,839 392,583 6,780,000 .611,509 7,391,509 0.05 2003 5,866,300 5,511,730 354,570 746,000 265,602 1,010,602 0.35 2004 5,621,743 5,492,510 129,233 820,000 241,387 1,061,387 0.12 2005 5,708,827 5,604,464 104,363 850,000 214,108 1,064,108 0.10 2006 5,929,984 5,808,902 121,082 880,000 199,260 1,079,260 0.11 2007 5,870,485 5,796,005 72,480 905,000 168,159 1,073,159 0.07 2008• 6,005,571 5,972,558 33,013 845,000 135,956 980,956 0.03 108 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS Last Ten Fiscal Years Estimated Personal. Per Capita High School Fiscal Income Personal Graduation _ Unemployment Year Population (In.thousands) Income Rate Rate 1999 47,235. $ 1,628,002 $. 34,466 88.2% 1.60% 2000 47,425 1,747,042 36,838 88:2 %, '2.40% 2001 47,465 1,774,194 37,379 91.5 %0 3.30% 2002 47,465. 1,796,693 37,853 91.5% 4.00% 2003 47,570 1,847,429 38,836 91.5% 4.10 % 2004 48,156 1,970,303 40,915 93.3% 3.90% - 2005 47,448 2,014,500 42,457 92.1% 3.30% 2006 46,896 2,074,538 44,237 92.0% 3.00% 2007 47,090 2,083,120 44,237 92.0% 3.45% 2008 47,090 2,083,120 44,237 92.0% 4.33% Sources: Population data from U.S. Census Bureau /Metropolitan Council. 2007 is the most recent estimate. Personal income estimates based on U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis data for the entire seven - county metropolitan area. Per - capita personal income data from U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis for the entire seven - county metropolitan area. 2006 is the most recent estimate. High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County. 2007 is the most recent estimate. Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO Employer Employees Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. 4,500 Fairview Southdale Hospital 2,500 Macy's (Marshall Field's or Dayton's) 1,200 Edina Public Schools ISD #273 1,172 Nash Finch Co. 350 International Dairy Queen Inc. 300 City of Edina 262 JC Penney Co. 250 Edina Realty 210 Con Agra Foods -Snack Food Gr. 196 Golden Valley Microwave Foods Health Risk Management Inc. Norwest Funding Roach Organization Inc. Totals 10,940 2008 1999 Source: State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). DNA: Historical data is not available 110 Percentage of Percentage of Total City Total City Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment 1 20.74% 2,000 2 7.77% 2 11.52% 2,400 1 9.32% 3 5.53% 500 5 1.94% 4 5.40% DNA DNA DNA 5 1.61% 350 8 1.36% 6 1.38% 300 9 1.17% 7 1.21% DNA DNA DNA 8 1.15% 400 6 1.55% 9 0.97% DNA DNA DNA 10 0.90% DNA DNA DNA 0.00% 650 3 2.53% 0.00% 552 4 2.14% 0.00% 358 7 1.39% 0.00% 140 10 0.54% 50.43% 7,650 29.72% Source: State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). DNA: Historical data is not available 110 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FULL -TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Budgeted Full -time Employees for Fiscal Year a Function 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 General Government Administration 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Planning 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Finance 5.40 5.50 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Elections 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assessing 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Public Works Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Engineering 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 6.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 8.50 8.50 Supervision 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Maintenance 28.00 28.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 Public Safety Police Protection 66.00 67.00 70.00 69.00 68.00 66.00 69.00 69.00 70.00 70.00 Animal Control 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Protection 30.00 31.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 33.00 33.00 Public Health 3.08 3.08 3.08 3.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Inspections 5.75 5.75 6.75 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 7.50 7.50 Parks & Recreation Administration 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 Maintenance 16.00 16.00 17.00 17.00 16.00 16.50 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 Central Services General 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 City Hall 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Public Works Bldg 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Equipment Ops 7.00 7.00 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 Utilities 16.25 16.25 15.70 14.50 14.50 15.50 15.75 15.75 15.25 15.75 Liquor 10.00 10.00 9.30 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 Aquatic Center - - - - - 0.20 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 Golf Course 14.00 14.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 Arena 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Art Center 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 Edinborough Park/ Centennial Lakes 13.00 12.00 13.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 Other 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 Total 264.73 266.83 272.83 273.00 270.00 268.50 271.50 270.00 277.50 278.00 Source: City of Edina Finance Department a Employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. 111 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Function General Government Total City employees Votes cast a Public Works Asphalt placed (tons) Concrete (cu. yds.) Public Safety Crimes reported Fire calls Medical calls Central Services Vehicle fixes Utilities Daily consumption b Aquatic Center Attendance Golf Course Total rounds played Fiscal Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 - 801 868 860 879 870 909 887 890 918 3,099 30,483 10,008 28,156 10,721 31,730 1,367 26,270 7,930 31,512 - - - - - - - 9,000 8,000 7,500 - - - - - - - 650 850 480 - - 2,411 2,139 2,073 1,983 1,908 1,937 2,010 NA 1,131 1,091 1,142 , 1,106 1,062 1,060 1,055 963 1,012 913 2,812 2,914 2,931 3,153 3,030 3,199 3,423 3,470 3,510 3,516 - - - - - - - 2,398 2,460 2,967 - - - - - - - 7,209 7,372 7,376 132,000 125,000 115,000 111,056 96,419 88,636 139,415 120,406 114,173 110,000 142,862 137,838 120,898 112,078 123,770 116,734 113,679 114,737 112,821 112,663 Source: Various City departments Note: The City prepared this schedule for the first time in 2006, therefore, some historical data is not readily available. NA: Data not available when this report was compiled. a The City Elections department runs general elections in even - numbered years and school district elections in odd - numbered years. Number of votes cast tend to vary between even and odd - numbered years and based on presidential election cycles. b Daily average of water pumped from city wells, measured in thousands of gallons. 112 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year Function 1999 2000 2001 2002 20,03 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Public Works _. Miles of streets, 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 . City parking ramps 4 4 4 4 4 4 .4 4 4 4 Public Safety - Fire stations. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Parks & Recreation City parks 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 Acreage of parks 1,552 1,552 1,552 1,552 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 Park buildings 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 Utilities Wells 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 Watermain miles 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 Sanitary sewer miles 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 Sewer connections 13,984 13,984 13,984 13,984 13,984 14,851 14,851 14,851 14,851 14,851 Arena Ice sheets 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Source: Various City departments 113