Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-09-15_COUNCIL MEETINGrf ' AGENDA EDINA HOUSING.AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY,COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL , ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA,,items andy_by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) Jn bold print are Consent_ Agenda items and are considered routine -anti will be enacted by one m "oton: ;There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member`so- requests it. In such cases the item Will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA, HOUSING.-A REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of September 1, 2009 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 1, 2009, and Work Session of September 1, 2009 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings, " the. Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration.. • In order.to. maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO OCTOBER 6. 2009: AMENDMENT TO OVERALL . DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL SITE PLAN - Little Szechuan Restaurant, 4820 West 77 Street B. PUBLIC HEARING DEVELOPMENT PLAN & APPEAL OF VARIANCES - Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office, 8050 West 78th Street, Resolution No. 2009 -80 (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) III. AWARD OF BID A. Forklift - Public Works * B. Contract No. 513 Concrete Work for Public Works Building -* C. Contract No. 5C Unit Masonry, for Public Works Building Agenda /Edina City Council September 15, 2009 Page 2 D. Contract No. 5D Miscellaneous Metals (Material Only) for Public Works Building E. Contract No. 5E Miscellaneous Metals (Labor Only) for Public Works Building F. Contract No. 5F Carpentry and Miscellaneous for Public Works Building G. Contract No. 5G Millwork/Casework (Material Only) for Public Works Building H. Contract No. 5H Metal Wall Panels for Public Works Building I. Contract No. 51 Roofing for Public Works Building J. Contract No. 5J Joint Sealants for Public Works Building K. Contract No. 5K Doors, Frames and Hardware (Material Only) for Public Works Building L. Contract No. 5L Overhead Doors for Public Works Building M. Contract No. 5N Aluminum Entrances & Framing /Glass & Glazing/Translucent Panel Skylight System for Public Works Building N. Contract No. 50 Gypsum Drywall Systems /Stucco for Public Works Building O. Contract No. 5P Tile for Public Works Building P. Contract No. 5Q Acoustical Ceilings for Public Works Building Q. Contract No. 5R Carpet and Vinyl Base for Public Works Building R. Contract No. 5S Resinous Coatings for Public Works Building (taken off consent) S. Contract No. 5T Painting for Public Works Building T. Contract No. 5V Vehicle Wash System for Public Works Building U. Contract No. 5W Vehicle Lifts for Public Works Building V. Contract No. 5X Overhead Cranes, Hoists & Monorail for Public Works Building W. Contract No. 5Y Fire Protection for Public Works Building X. Contract No. 5Z Mechanical for Public Works Building Y. Contract No. 5AA Electrical for Public Works Building Z. Contract No. 6 Geo Thermal for Public Works Building IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Edina Public Works Energy Analysis - The Weidt Group B. Resolution No. 2009 -81 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) C. SECOND READING - ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -11 - Amending Section 850 Allowing Drive - throughs In the PCD -1 District (Favorable majority of Council Members to approve) D. Resolution No. 2009 -82 Approving Lot Division, 4306 Grimes Avenue and 4209 Morningside Road E. Resolution No. 2009 -83 Approving Final Plat 5920 Oaklawn Avenue F. Set Hearing Date (10/20/09) Ordinance No. 2009 -12 - Amending Section 850 To Require A Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Buildings Over 1,000 Square Feet G. Traffic Safety Report of September 8, 2009 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT f Agenda /Edina City Council September 15, 2009 Page 3 During "Community Comment, " the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated September 3 2009, TOTAL $387,811.32; and Pre -List dated September 10, 2009 TOTAL $1,085,058.58 and Credit Card Transaction 7 -28 to 8 -25 -2009 TOTAL $5,843.94 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Receive Petition Requesting Sidewalk B. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Sep 15 Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 22 Town Hall Meeting 7:00 -8:30 P.M. CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRUM Tues Sep 29 Joint Meeting With Edina School Board Tues Oct 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 27 Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Nov 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 3 ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Wed Nov 11 VETERANS' DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Nov 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 25 Study Session - To be determined 7:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Thur Nov 26 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 27 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Dec 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 22 Study Session - To be determined 11:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Thur Dec 25 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon Fri Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Thur Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S DAY EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 18, 2009, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for August 18, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the payment of claims dated August 20, 2009, TOTAL $1,832.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:01 p.m. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 7:01 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the Council Consent Agenda. Rolicall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PROCLAMATION ANNOUNCED — CONSTITUTION WEEK SEPTEMBER 17 -23, 2009 Member Swenson approving a proclamation declaring September 17 -23, 2009, as Constitution Week in the City of Edina. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland read the proclamation and presented it to Diane Plunkett Latham. Diane Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, Daughters of the American Revolution, thanked the Council for the proclamation and for living up to the objectives of the Constitution. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 18, 2009, AND WORK SESSION OF AUGUST 18, 2009 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 18, 2009, and Work Session of August 18, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE 2009 -11 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING SECTION 850 ALLOWING DRIVE - THROUGHS IN THE PCD -1 DISTRICT Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the request of Richards and Wanninger, LLC, to amend the City's zoning ordinance to allow restaurants to have a drive - through window in the PCD -1 zoning district. If approved, the amendment would allow Prima Restaurant/Bull Run Coffee to utilize the existing drive - through window at Clancy's site, 4420 Valley View Road. Mr. Teague advised the Planning Commission had recommended the Council not adopt the requested ordinance amendment, noting their rationale and four findings. He also advised that staff supported approval and presented staff's recommended conditions. The Council discussed the request and asked questions of Mr. Teague, City Manager Hughes, and City Attorney Knutson. Proponent Presentation John Wanninger, 6509 Navaho Trail, Richard and Wanninger, LLC, presented their concept to locate a restaurant and coffee shop at the Clancy's site and the request to amend the City's zoning ordinance allowing the sale of food (coffee, donuts, pastries) at the drive - through. He updated the Council on the challenges associated with the location and Clancy's decision to not renew its lease. Mr. Wanninger presented plans to recycle the obsolete building and stated the applicant accepted staffs recommended conditions of approval. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 1, 2009 Jennifer King, Prima Restaurant, 9560 Lake Town Road, Chaska, advised of the two restaurants she currently operated with her husband. She spoke of their desire to locate in the Clancy's site. Ms. King stated Prima Restaurant made its products on site, used organic products, and were both family and pedestrian friendly. Greg Hoyt, 4610 Wooddale Avenue, Bull Run Coffee, stated he owned a coffee roaster and typically sold to restaurants. Mr. Hoyt said he intended to create a concept to bring fine coffee to the consumer. He explained the economic importance of a drive - through to sell products and stated his belief this would be a fine concept for this Edina. neighborhood. The Council asked questions of the proponents. Mr. Wanninger advised that should a drive - through not be approved, they would consider a sandwich shop for this space. Mr. Teague stated that were the zoning ordinance amended to make a drive - through window a conditional use, application for a CUP would require building and elevation plans as well as a traffic study. building and elevatien plans would be needed as well as a tFaffiG study. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Public Testimony Colleen Naughton, 6205 Concord Avenue, addressed the Council. Robert Burley, 4400 Valley View Road, business owner, addressed the Council. Elizabeth Lederle, 6017 Wooddale Avenue, addressed the Council. Germana Paterlini, Energy & Environment Commission, 5117 Duggan Plaza, addressed the Council. Diane Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, addressed the Council. Denise Elmquist, 6100 Kellogg Avenue, addressed the Council. Julia Risser, 6112 Ashcroft Avenue, addressed the Council. Eric Fantin, 6033 Kellogg Avenue, addressed the Council. Allen Beers, 6045 Wooddale Avenue, addressed the Council. Don Womack, 1988 Oak Knoll Drive, White Bear Lake, addressed the Council. Meg Newell, 6080 Wooddale Avenue, addressed the Council. Ron Elmquist, 6100 Kellogg Avenue, addressed the Council. The Council discussed the expected level and circulation of traffic. Trudy Landgren, 6104 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Sara Ann Sexton, 6009 Fairfax Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 1. 2009 The Council discussed the funding and scope of traffic studies and asked questions of staff. Mr. Knutson addressed zoning district classifications and notification standards. w#iGh . Mr. Teague defined accessory and permitted uses, confirming that accessory uses do not require notice or review or approval by the Planning Commission or City Council Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to grant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2009 -11, amending the City code concerning regulation of drive - through facilities. The Council discussed the ordinance and proposed the following revisions: Subd. 14, F3, "Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. "; add F.7. "Drive - through windows shall be limited to one service bay. "; add G. to limit the audio system and menu board to assure it does not impact adjacent single - family residences in all zoning districts; Section 3, Subd. 7, "...A restaurant may have a drive - through facility subject to the requirements in Section 850.07, Subd. 14F . "; and staff to verify language contained in Section 850.16. Member Brindle and Member Housh accepted these friendly amendments to the motion. The GeuRGH aGknowledged the ame ^r° and- an a66es8ery Use. Member Bennett stated that while she supported the proposed use, she would not support the ordinance amendment making drive - through windows an accessory use in all PCD -1 districts. It was noted the revised ordinance would be considered for second reading on September 15, 2009. Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — JEFF PLACE SUMP DRAIN INSTALLATION IMP. #STS -366 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for Jeff Place sump drain improvements, Improvement No. STS 366, to the recommended low bidder, RPU, Inc. at $23,310.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -75 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -75 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -76 ADOPTED APPROVING AND ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -76, approving and adopting comprehensive plan update. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET (9/15/09) — FOR PLANNING ITEMS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett setting public hearing dates for September 15, 2009, as follows: 1. Amendment to overall development plan and final site plan for Little Szechuan Restaurant at 4820 -West 77th Street. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 1, 2009 2. Final development plan with side yard setbacks and height variances at 8050 West 78th Street for Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -77 ADOPTED — SETTING HEARING DATES FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECTS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -77, calling public hearings for consideration of certain special assessments and delinquent utilities October 6, 2009, and October 20, 2009. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN POLICY AMENDED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving an amendment to the health care savings plan policy. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 20, 2009, and consisting of 37 pages: General Fund $172,219.40; Communications Fund $18,999.24; Working Capital Fund $202,514.59; Art Center Fund $10,272.04; Golf Dome Fund $61.69; Aquatic Center Fund $13,454.36; Golf Course Fund $31,486.75; Ice Arena Fund $33,654.39; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $149,794.64; Liquor Fund $210,358.79; Utility Fund $125,038.32; Storm Sewer Fund $3,949.27; Recycling Fund $37,077.90; TOTAL $1,006,881.39 and for approval of payment of claims dated August 27, 2009, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $356,958.00; Communications Fund $1,433.41; Police Special Revenue $16,262.54; PIR Debt Service Fund $4,000.00; Working Capital Fund $1,220,337.37; Art Center Fund $75.74; Aquatic Center Fund $8,146.97; Golf Course Fund $95,189.13; Ice Arena Fund $3,562.02; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $35,483.91; Liquor Fund $155,293.45; Utility Fund $844,246.97; Storm Sewer Fund $345,703.34; Recycling Fund $32.39; PSTF Agency Fund $6,095.78; TOTAL $3,092,821.01. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -79 ADOPTED ADOPTING PRELIMINARY 2010 LEVY & OPERATING BUDGET Mr. Hughes presented the maximum proposed preliminary 2010 tax levy of $25,492,973, an increase of 2.2% in the levy and 3.3% in the debt service levy, for a total increase of 5.5 %. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -79 adopting the proposed budget for the City of Edina for year 2010, and establishing the proposed tax levy payable in 2010. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. BUDGET AND LEVY MEETING PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET (12101/09) AND BUDGET ADOPTION DATE SET (12/15/09) Mr. Hughes recommended dates for the budget and levy public hearing and budget adoption. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, setting the budget and levy public hearing on Tuesday, December 1, 2009, at 7:00 p.m., and the budget and levy adoption for Tuesday, December 15, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 1:2009 THREE ,RIVERS` PARK. DISTRICT Mr.. Hughes read the Three Rivers Park District letter regarding nomination of community assessment,teams for the regional trail. NOMINATION TO COMMITTEES DISCUSSED Given the time of year, Council consensus was reached to.fill committee vacancies fromm.'applications on file, appointing the next highest vote getter, upon the Mayor's recommendation. STAFF RECOGNIZED The Council congratulated City Clerk.Deb Mangen on receiving MMC certification. - There being no further business on the Council Agenda,-Mayor Hovland declared -the meeting adjourned at 9:27 p:m. Respectfully'submitted, Debra A. Ma "ngen, MMC, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 15, 2009. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September 1, 2009, meeting available. Page 5 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 5:35 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Director; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to review proposed preliminary budget, levy and process that would be followed during this year's budget process. City Manager Hughes outlined the process that cities were to follow in their budget adoption process this year. He explained it differed slightly than in the past. Key points included: • Budget and Levy Meeting - Public must have an opportunity to speak, and the meeting must be a regular City Council meeting held after November 24, 2009. • Parcel specific notices will be sent to all Gitizens property owners of proposed 2010 taxes. • Notice published within 30 days before the Budget and Levy Meeting. • Budget Adoption Meeting must be a regular City Council meeting held after the Budget and Levy Meeting. The Council and staff discussed the proposed 2010 budget. It was agreed that the Council would review the first draft of the 2010 Budget at their work session September 15, 2009, at 5:30 p.m. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 15, 2009. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: September 15, 2009 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item II.A. Consent - - Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Continue Hearing Date for a an amendment to an Overall Action ® Motion Development Plan and Final Site Plan for Little Szechuan ❑ Resolution Restaurant at 4820 West 77+h Street. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Continue the public hearing to Tuesday, October 6, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. Information/Background: See attached Planning Commission staff report. A. oe V1 co PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 2, 2009 2008- 0014.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Wayzata Properties is proposing to remodel the existing Walsh Title building at 482077 th Street West from an 18,931 square foot office building to an 8,279 square foot, 140 -seat Little Szechuan Restaurant, and a 10,652 square foot office. This building is located in the Gateway Development, which has an overall development plan for this entire area. (See overall development plan on page A8a.) This site is designated for office space on the plan. The request requires the following: 1. An Overall Development Plan Amendment to allow a restaurant on this site. 2. Final Site Plan Approval. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Fred Richards Golf Course; zoned R -1, and guided as Open Space /Park. Easterly: Pentagon office buildings; zoned MDD -6 and guided Office /Residential. Southerly: Pentagon office buildings; zoned MDD -6 and guided Office /Residential. Westerly: Burgundy Place; zoned MDD -6 and guided Office /Residential Existing Site Features The subject property is relatively flat, 1.75 acres in size, and contains an office building. (See pages A2 —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Office /Residential Zoning: MDD -6, Mixed Development District Site Access The primary access to the site would remain off 77th Street. Traffic Kimley -Horn conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development. Kimley -Horn concludes that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See pages All 6 —A19.) Per the original approval of the overall - development plan, mitigation measures are required for this overall project. These measures are spelled out specifically in the Preliminary Development Plan Agreement for Gateway. There are no traffic improvements that would be triggered as part of this request. The Transportation Commission considered the project at their August 20, 2009 meeting, and tabled the request, due to concerns over parking. (See draft minutes attached at -the back of this report.) Parking Based on the number of seats and employees in the restaurant, and the square footage of the remaining office space, 95 parking stalls are required to support the project. The site plan demonstrates that 80 parking stalls exist on the site. Kimley -Horn also conducted a parking study to determine if the site could function with 80 parking spaces. Based on the study, the proposed uses would function with 76 spaces. (See study on pages A13 —A15.) The applicant has the ability to add 15 stalls on the site by reconfiguring and adding pavement in the green space areas. (See page A9a.) This could serve as proof -of- parking. Should parking ever become a problem on the site, staff could require the additional stalls to be constructed. This should be made a condition of any approval. Building Design The existing building would be remodeled. The existing red brick would be painted grey. Stucco and tile accents would be added. (See pages A5 and A11.) The applicant will have a sample board that shows construction materials at both the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. N Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 28 overstory trees are required. The applicant has demonstrated 28 existing and proposed trees on the site. Most are mature existing trees. As the site is fully developed, there is little opportunity for additional landscaping. However, the applicant is also proposing understory shrubs along the building and along the street. (See page A10.) Grading /Drainage /Utilities There would be no change to existing grading, drainage and utilities. Overall Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2. D. (4) requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of an Overall Development Plan. The Commission and Council should consider the following findings as they relate to the requested amendment: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for mixed uses. The restaurant and office would be permitted in the MDD -6 Zoning district. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; This site is designated for office use on the Overall Development Plan for Gateway. Therefore, the applicant is also requesting an amendment to the Overall Development Plan to allow a restaurant on the site, in addition_ to the Final Site Plan. (See page A8b.) c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The restaurant would not be detrimental to surrounding property. Rather, it would allow a use that would compliment existing adjacent office and residential uses, and the future adjacent use to the east, which is to be senior housing. d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; and e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; 3 The proposal would not result in an overly- intensive land use. Kimley -Horn conducted a traffic study, which concludes that the proposed use could be supported by the existing roadways. (See traffic study on pages A16 —A19.) e) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and With the execution of the proof -of- parking, the site would meet all applicable provisions of the City Code. 1) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Compliance Table The following demonstrates the existing conditions on the site compared to the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is not proposing an expansion of the building, only a remodeling. CI City Standard Existing Condition Front 35 feet 49 feet Side NA (interior tract in the MDD) 19.7 feet Side NA (interior tract in the MDD) 122 feet Rear 35 feet 29.5 feet Building Height No Maximum 12 feet Parking lot and 20 feet (street) 26 feet drive aisle setback Over -story Trees 28 required 28 existing (number is based on the perimeter of the entire site) Building 30% 25% Coverage Maximum Floor 1,881,134 square foot site 1,881,134 s.f. total allowed Area Ratio (FAR) (for the entire 18,931 s.f. MDD -6 District) Parking Stalls — 95 spaces (based on square footage of existing 97 spaces with the proof -of- Mixed building) parking plan Development District CI Staff: Recommendation Recommend approval of the Overall Development Plan Amendment and Final Site Plan to allow a restaurant at 4830 West 77th Street for Wayzata Properties. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal.would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final °Site Plan. 2) The Final Site Plan is consistent with the approved Overall Development Plan. 3) The proposed use is reasonable. It provides a reasonable on -site parking for the restaurant and office, based on the parking study that was performed by Kimley -Horn. 4) Execution of the proof -of- parking plan would provide enough parking to meet City Code. Approval of the Overall Development Plan Amendment and Final Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped June 29, 2009. • Grading, Drainage & Landscape plan date stamped July 23, 2009 • Overall Development Plan date stamped July 23, 2009 2) If required, submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof - of- parking stalls be constructed. 4) Compliance with all conditions listed by the city engineer in his memo. 5) Compliance with all conditions required by the Transportation Commission. Deadline for a city decision: October 20, 2009 6-1 L Staff: Recommendation Recommend approval of the Overall Development Plan Amendment and Final Site Plan to allow a restaurant at 4830 West 77th Street for Wayzata Properties. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal.would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final °Site Plan. 2) The Final Site Plan is consistent with the approved Overall Development Plan. 3) The proposed use is reasonable. It provides a reasonable on -site parking for the restaurant and office, based on the parking study that was performed by Kimley -Horn. 4) Execution of the proof -of- parking plan would provide enough parking to meet City Code. Approval of the Overall Development Plan Amendment and Final Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped June 29, 2009. • Grading, Drainage & Landscape plan date stamped July 23, 2009 • Overall Development Plan date stamped July 23, 2009 2) If required, submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof - of- parking stalls be constructed. 4) Compliance with all conditions listed by the city engineer in his memo. 5) Compliance with all conditions required by the Transportation Commission. Deadline for a city decision: October 20, 2009 6-1 City of Edina 11 01 0 I/SI .91619124 4100 151 5516_45' >Or 7076 t -19oaJ Ia+1 1,171 asoo 1000 its_ '004d \ \I1a 100 IO7J 10!17 7113- Legend H:ph4phlvO F..— 4vui9ae � NOS \V ... ,fa u`291sr uosno+ 7077 -7070 i 71n- 1409 /517 u1o�170b 7121 - '701916 Ntl 1109 - -lH7.� HouEe num Eel uEalE /7/90 71 f5 rr ,T 111745%�,5017f09 NJI 7115' " 912, �1I00 1770 1772 NtM n007116 151711500 WB -' 7024 `f 17 NN 7139- Streel Yamv La Eels 1125 �.1 7201 t'w4109` a09 I T - 4il- V u7� \1900 /601 n25 �ti I I1r1516 /M77 2477 �, 71 j,pp• 7/ TIJ]- city 1—t. 7/77 /1503 1910 /9iE 1907 U1) 1 I /71] I)Ofj�p 1512! «�IMI /U76W29 u71 i_� LtJ)- 110/17t7170P nos_ r ! L 1�N17 -- 1136 ^/ CreekE t4 TtiJ• )275 7720 V7TN 77S0 ��iM19 L /700, y/2DS/ 1212,'7204 u17>13014500 NISIUJINH 1100140172011700 1700 /102'1 N0919�05��d1�09/19�p�}7�20071 ^ 72f1 �TW1317'1�40.19`15057 µllw] 1 2416 N1�7770<) 7205720/ 7204 f� �j7017201 )]D9 7209 `{)2oc 45pfwb� u79/ 77x1 77001TOd 7306 4912190.'9001d0a 1800' 727073/61217 )101 0477 1103 H01 / ?27111 71177717 E Lkv rvlmes Like. r I Parka )t11v/ t f LJ 1K1 7240\ 7700 72097217 )171 7 220 121] 7708 7 N11t NiB N+T 7317 ' I '1rJ ir7 7TH �A./ f ��L 77/6 L72/71116 — �TitI: 72ZS 71r -7112 a«1 N "W— 7721 ,3317330 Parcels 7177 7770 �N07/ 1210 "43 (J 24 )17071 ^ TI /277 7771 24571116 N29� 7120 4005 <IN�1223 17007223!700 L' N>N NTS�B1/03 12251221 '091901 (. 7771 1 `77771210 /3Jd/ 770}'7301 7.lOfi' /a1`0 NJI 2421 7NM,", Ile, 1200) U201244 NII N70Y17 /101 177057!01 1775! �f�N07J00t -770 7770 7]OS \M7D ws7 `L.N76 CIO/ I I I 110d 7309 730A � nM 7t577tN� �7ri —i7tz 7]1]4440 µ5}Y- )717)717 a 4145 12511u11:7r6771J Ire )r7 µ1w77 wANf7 2409 NOT 7712 `inn wn�L..1. 1701 7100 1770/719 J__1T�` lJ 77/613177!16 = /1 y,��170/r�� 4000 1311130/ N7t NH11110111W 17211730 1321 ?..,7724 i 7320 n]7 I ISTO U70 /70114701 7329 77JJ ^-- 17� 1771 17"2 16pP 1609 LS19 151] /SOS 2415 NTf IIO9 0403 7171 7716 1]]6 16011535(521/5091501 I 1 f 1 1f400 t1b1 7772_ (JIM Ei19 /779 /712 //6061600 4520 /5121506 4500 '740f � 7170 S10s 7400 24 JJ �/701_f IaM�4516 .wa 1 I 1 .740 7'27NO1� I2w 1 ,m !7109' 1102 ntJnw nm7�ii1oiy 1sos 7be dun 7. 1s /1 1705 7/004/511 I ,�9�II ii /dfI p 4251 '7171 7450 7150 7101 7b47b9157015184 7/111 , N .7100 /if7 p 7450 q i7S0/� 400.5 450 '7305 UYV Eatnv� 0413 787019/6 71JI1U674247116. 1517/309 'JJ. n17j \ 4076. yL�wT.y�y(`(4,9t12,',j1[f/J 1439 1[JO 7421 182 51d2 5161 ... 7505 11� '17 490 , 1901 IIb 1 71?3 y 71 0 2456 1sw IN1 TIT►/ i / '9s 1110 1�<wa�i\wslisa tlsu6 7� H ,� L -, 7625 7615 1613 Counr V190/J 7w1>[37 >6p = k 7 MS 7467 7600 1049 )075 3,a IN )600 '7 ,/— 4510 slot /5175 5103 TI 100 1120 1700 4610 NM 5570/330 1510 43,0 4013 11 5715 5151 1000 1363 I10f 31 1110 0425 4545 4955 4145 IU3 2475 1711 1111 4 '555 1 PID: 3102824330018 O p 1 qp- 4820 77th St W z Q Edina, MN 55435 �N • 7'ti�tu1ru51 Ty' • fuo„ LOGISMap Output Page 0 City of Edina rw, .eor reap Legond Ho... H—b- L,b.l. .152 7433 , Str..t "me L oCel. /- city Lime. 7407 creek. 1917 ' ' El Lit. Herne. ` IS01 2Me 7" - - 4•)709- 7 tei5 L.k.. � P.—I. 2008 A. H.1 Pnolo I • � � �C' �. 8 Q. r r ge �}'s y � r ►k�1 t � � 1.lIkRfM IeM \ .. . totes r S2 w Mlrf c - r fi wws. c «wrc�.rrarsm .ilt t' " PID: 3102824330018 4820 77th St W �I Yr2 O All Edina, MN 55435 0 , LOGISMap Output Page F � r !t►m ,i �, ^illy rt* •� AP S fit• � � t! � �'•�� �� * +x ..► �: iris � � r A ,, 4F LOGISMap Output Page A4 City of Edina Legod city U,,Ift Las Parks M. El Eu I. IN oe A4 k If 1� S 6 Intended Use of 4830 West 77th Street N a� Little Szechuan, LLC $ June, 2009 Szechuan cuisine, also spelled as Sichuan cuisine, is the most well -known Chinese culinary tradition in China because of its creative usage of spices and other flavors, ahead of seven other main regional Chinese cuisines, such as the westernized Cantonese and Hunan. Little Szechuan is a locally owned medium -size restaurant serving healthy, authentic Szechuan food in St. Paul, Minnesota. It has received top ratings from many food critics including: Mpls St Paul Magazine, Minnesota Monthly, City Pages, Star Tribune, Pioneer Press, Twin Cities Metro, and more. And in 2008 and 2009 Mpls St Paul Magazine, and City Pages awarded Little Szechaun "Best Chinese Restaurant " Szechuan has cho the Little Szechuan Council's approval, The 3500- square -foot 150 -seat restaurant operates seven days a week, open for both lunch and dinner hours. It offers over 200 authentic dishes created by Szechuan chefs who are originally from Szechuan Province of China. The honestly authentic dishes, combined with a sophisticated and modern decor, offers a unique dining experience that forever transforms every first -time diner's understanding of Chinese cuisine. After more than two years of feasibility analysis and extensive site reviews, Little sen Edina as the location to expand with an upscale version of Chinese Cuisine. The site chosen, subject to the Edina City is the building at 4830 West 77th Street, Edina, Minnesota. � In the 4830 West 77th street location, the new restaurant will continue the focus on authentic Szechuan food. The concept will be an upscale bistro that serves exceptional authentic Chinese cuisine with attentive service in a stylish contemporary ambience. The decor will reflect the fuse of oriental taste and western sophistication. It will include a full bar featured with specialty cocktails and a private dining room for special occasions. The restaurant will be open for lunch and dinner, with a late -night menu of lighter fare. The food will be more delicate with combined focus of flavors and presentation. Full- course menus will be offered with a complete wine list. The menu prices will range from $12 to $22, with an average dish price of $16 to $17 but high -end dishes priced between $25 and $40. The new restaurant will target the majority Minnesotan residents who are delighted to explore and enjoy authentic Chinese food with an upscale atmosphere and service. We believe the new restaurant will contribute to the already unique and bustling Edina business and residential'g� landscape.! , We respectfully submit our request to open our Edina restaurant at this 77r* S- treet- location, and will be available at any time to answer any questions you may have. Jv►� J� "If you're headed to Little Szechuan, the brightly painted, authentic Chinese restaurant on University Avenue in St. Paul, pick up some friends on your way. You're going to want to roll at least three deep to stage a multi -order attack on the menu, which offers more than 200 dishes. Where to begin? The dan dan noodles swimming in_chile oil and the chicken lettuce wraps are the perfect appetizer entry points, to be followed closely by Szechuan spicy tofu —a deep -fried version that continues the fiery chile theme. More adventurous diners can wade into funkier fare like the pork ear shreds or tongue slices (basically a cold salad with thin sections of tongue), while the traditionalists can delight in how well Little Szechuan does staples like kung pao chicken and stir - fried pea tips.... Divide and conquer." — City Pages 2009 Best of the Twin Cities pY i "For years, Chinese -food lovers pined for a place that featured a credible Sichuan bill of fare. Last year we got it with Little Szechuan - a real -deal University Avenue storefront. Bamboo shoots with spicy oil, fish fillet with tofu in spicy broth, Chung King chili shrimp, and beef stew with spicy hot sauce are guaranteed to set your taste buds tingling." — Mpls St Paul Magazine 2008 Best Restaurants a ;CIT TOR, W& BEST OF THE TVIIfN Ji "Little Szechuan vaulted onto the scene this year with a menu offering equal pain and suffering to all: If you wanted the numbing, burning bliss of Beef and Tofu cooked with Spicy Tasty Broth ($10.95) you'd get said bubbling, numbing chili inferno whether you were white, blue, spotted, or whatnot, and whether it was Tuesday lunch or Sunday dinner. Eureka! Bring on the delectable, paper -thin beef short ribs, trot out the platters of emerald -green pea tips, and load up on sea - foam -green meadows of cucumber topped with handfuls, of black -red chili pods. Real authentic Szechuan cooking for all? Call it a miracle, call it a joy, but be sure to call for another beer to numb the heat — you'll need it." — City Pages 2007 Best of the Twin Cities A7 RECENT REVIEWS: "I did not experience a single misstep in any of my five visits to what is easily the best eatery in the east metro, and one of the handful of honest and authentic Chinese dining experiences citywide. Little Szechuan's food is superb." - Andrew Zimmern, Mpis St Paul Magazine "Little Szechuan isn't one of those generic Chinese restaurants that puts the word "Szechuan" in its name for marketing purposes, oh no no no. Little Szechuan is the real deal, a Szechuan specialist that uses chili peppers the way blizzards use snow. This is how Szechuan food should be. I think Little Szechuan is the best thing to happen to St. Paul in years." - ®ara Moskowitz, Food Critic, City Pages i ariribune I MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA "Are they authentic? A Chinese - American friend tells me that they come closer to dishes he's had in China than anything he has had at other U.S. Chinese restaurants." - Jeremy Iggers, Food Critic, Star Tribune P 10 N E PR[4iSS "The food is the real deal - woodsy, oily, spicy and hot enough to make your eyes water and numb your tongue. In other words, addictively delicious. The restaurant has only been open a week, and I've been back three times - once on the paper's dime and twice on my own." - Kathie Jenkins, Food Critic, St. Paul Pioneer Press M. IN .a Fl��j ���� 0.'ry•'. 3 411: 1 A EWA I. 6 = l , 0 125 250 I I ACTIVE PHASE PROPOSED BUILDING11 EXISTING BUILDING SCALE ® N r fA . A- LOFT HOTEL WEST PARKING 4 EAST BUILDING (4 -11 STORIES; 80,000 gsf 6 LEVELS 360,000 gsf R 150 ROOMS 1200 , STALLS it jp19 EAST PARKING AALL 6 LEVELS 1 15 7600 PARKLAWN ° 1 TOWNHOME'l 18 UNITS 0 TOWNHOME2 18 UNITS 1,200 STALLS 85,632 gsf m o Ua� INDEPENDENT LIVING 1 INDEPENDENT LIVING 2 ',t + +: ASSISTED LIVING 2 1© BURGUNDY PLACE w 122 UNITS 122 UNITS 103 UNITS 36 UNITS (MIXED USE) n 16,560 gsf o 09) ASSISTED LIVING 1 TOWNHOME 3 a 103103 U�- 26 UNITS 18 WALSH TITLE 21,000 gsf (OFFICE) WEST BUILDING (4 -10 STORIES) INDEPENDENT LIVING 3 �w 377,375 gsf (OFFICE) 122 UNITS miller dunwiddie ��� KirrdeyHorn WP and Associates. Inc. 123 NDrlh Third 51nr1 Sail. 106 Wry6atA Prt+Ppr [fps, LLC Mlnnrrmils MN 55601 -1657 rgwsm EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Overall Plan naannr. sm.c CDMN. MD.: KAM0812 r— 71 JANUARY 2WA PROPOSED SITE PLAN D�xp, d10 EDINA GATEWAY - COMPLETE PROJECT (2017) C116ClT.Dt Dnannr. slragpo S -2. P tt� • • ,, 1a 01 _x ,!- I .4. w 4. •`� � � � 6 n ifiilif� � ' _ _ 0 125 0 �. 6. ACTIVE PHASE PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING enSiiiij SCALE IN FT. 25 N Mll A- LOFT HOTEL ( WEST PARKING 4Fy' EAST BUILDING (4 -11 STORIES; OVOALL 0GIVEto PmEv T 150 6LEVELS EAST PARKING 150 ROOMS 1,200 STALLS W,10 EAST PARKING TOWNHOME 1 TOWNHOME 2 6 LEVELS N 11 15 7600 PARKLAWN 18 UNITS 18 UNITS 1,200 STALLS �1PIAV O 15 E VJ 65,632 gsf 4 INDEPENDENT LIVING 1 W INDEPENDENT LIVING 2 �, ASSISTED LIVING 2 917 BURGUNDY PLACE 122 UNITS 122 UNITS 103 UNITS 36 UNITS (MIXED USE) g)� 16,560 gsf o ASSISTED LIVING 1 ® TOWNHOME 3 �j m 103 UNITS 26 UNITS 16 RESTAURANT /OFFICE 18,931 gsf WEST BUILDING (4 -10 STORIES) � INDEPENDENT LIVING 3 377,375 gsf (OFFICE) 122 UNITS millerdunw' �= KimleyHorn wp . m. and Associates, Inc. 12J Norlh Third St—t S .- Mi.— pnOs MN 55601 -1657 WayzatA P— perti—LLC. EDINA 'AY Pentagon Par, Jelopment Re- Zoning anu . verall Plan GoYN. no, KAMge1z oAannc mi.t: oarz, 11 JANUARY 20OR PROPOSED SITE PLAN our, d)g EDINA GATEWAY - COMPLETE PROJECT cl¢ ®, (2017) nnarmr. nilan,rn. S -2. P G� INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT DOCUMENT NO. 4445988 FOUND IRON PIPE WITH CAP 0.4' WEST OF PROPERTY LINE 0 n u7 U1 O O O O Z SURVEY AND SITE PLAN ,,— TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER GOLF COURSE FENCE CORNER 0.3' NORTH FENCE 2.7' NORTH OF— OF PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY CORNER N 89'49'30" W 320.00' GRASS AREA e SHED ITUMINOUS PARKING LOT b Y 3 � pq nD TRACT S �Y R.L.S. MO. 1 050 PROPOSED DAYCARE 10,652 S.F. BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT 78 STANDARD STALLS 2 HANDICAPPED STALLS (5 01. L v� • REQSTM1 D 1ANo allRVEYY W. 1I= �( \N(��i. 'fie r EXISTING BUILDING 18,931 S.F. TRACT S, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1050, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA V 1 � ^OEM QP ^7 ,0) Ov P Z ti0 O� r° RESTAURANT b r2y 8,279 S.F. GRASS AREA Q� 20 Jssj R X68 �\ �i4o .SJ. II w O _ M O O 00 ri O UT O Z a AC E� U I J � JQ�Qa 0., LLJ �LJW .�ZZ onO ,- - - 0, Q ao< � D0 <N 3 N _ I C DESCRIPTION OF RECORD: O TRACT S, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1050, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA V 1 � ^OEM QP ^7 ,0) Ov OJ Z 77,567 S.F. (1.78 ACRES) II w O _ M O O 00 ri O UT O Z a AC E� U I J � JQ�Qa 0., LLJ �LJW .�ZZ onO ,- - - 0, Q ao< � D0 <N 3 N _ I C DESCRIPTION OF RECORD: TRACT S, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1050, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARCEL AREA I 77,567 S.F. (1.78 ACRES) PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0 4820 - 4630 77TH ST. W. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 S -1 c INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT-, r T ' DOCUMENT NO 4445988 �: 'r -- - - to FOUND IRON PIPE WITH CAP 1 to 0.4' WEST OF PROPERTY LINE-- / - -- c0 I W O M O_ O O Z q ■ E o' zo .0 50' SEARINO9 BNOWN HEUM ARE BARED ON BEOIH7Ei® LAND SURVEY NO. 10W - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER � FENCE CORNER 0.3 NORTH I - - - - - - OF PROPERTY LINE `fl0 V ~ V 05 � QP JG) MARX j� G f wj QFSCRIPT10N OF RECORD: TRACT S. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 105[ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARCEL AREA' 77,567 S.F_ (1.78 ACRES) PROPERTY ADOR'SS� 4820-4830 77TH ST. W. EDINA, MINN-SOTA 55435 / COLE COURSE / FENCE 2.7' NORTH OF - - - - -- PROPERTY CORNER W 0. M O O W 7 Ln O I i I Z w V ~ V 05 � QP JG) MARX j� G f wj QFSCRIPT10N OF RECORD: TRACT S. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 105[ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARCEL AREA' 77,567 S.F_ (1.78 ACRES) PROPERTY ADOR'SS� 4820-4830 77TH ST. W. EDINA, MINN-SOTA 55435 \ \\ N Nd-Q 0, Qe. V o C7 N 3 EXISTING BUILDING Q 3 i •e: e r 16,931 S.F. N / / i. �9�f .eua •eu. Q °.e /� rn� • -[ �` �� �9 ___._ O RES, oUCAFT TTTTTl 1�I xuo i�ee aim ro auvnv. "°� �°nx GRASS ARE Wo O 4fc IR MfR aVR � C 4 ^ I� �e DESCRIPTION OF RECORD: TRACT 5. RECISTEflED LAND SURVEY N0. 1050, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA e PARCEL AREA: 77,567 S.F. (1.78 ACRES) 8 c PROPERTY ADDRESS C 4820 -4830 77TH ST. W. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 S -2 , LANDSCAPING LEGEND ��0\v PLAN BENCHMARK AS NOTED A� •euo EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION x.roxe ew o xenon ,e¢ SURFACE DRAINAGE FLOW a f O�S OLF COURSE p FIRE HYDRANT V\v V .ex.x exe a GRASS AR GENERATOR pa GATE VALVE y> ^ xE F1 POWER POLE BIIUMIx PAKIF(FiG T x c OVERHEAD POWER LINE Q •eua c r g..,,rz LIGHT POLE RB�B @Y . ELEG MANHOLE oa p ezv e O eu. Iii ® GAS METER z O � BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN 3 ",q)70 GRASS A A All 0 CATCH BASIN © TELEPHONE PEDESTAL z 9d I r cx UJ M,� TREE LINE J . esa PROPOSED DAYCARE xc HEDGE ROW W O O 10,652 S.F. CONIFEROUS TREE LLJWW •.,.e BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT i. DECIDUOUS TREE �ZZ � Z0 O SHRUB � 0 0 0a� > c, O O a o. � Of \ \\ N Nd-Q 0, Qe. V o C7 N 3 EXISTING BUILDING Q 3 i •e: e r 16,931 S.F. N / / i. �9�f .eua •eu. Q °.e /� rn� • -[ �` �� �9 ___._ O RES, oUCAFT TTTTTl 1�I xuo i�ee aim ro auvnv. "°� �°nx GRASS ARE Wo O 4fc IR MfR aVR � C 4 ^ I� �e DESCRIPTION OF RECORD: TRACT 5. RECISTEflED LAND SURVEY N0. 1050, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA e PARCEL AREA: 77,567 S.F. (1.78 ACRES) 8 c PROPERTY ADDRESS C 4820 -4830 77TH ST. W. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 S -2 WEST ELEVATION L SCALE: 1/B -1' -0 51 MI S1 T1 TI _� �o (SOUTH ELEVATION '� SCALE: 1 /B'�I _ TI PARK GREY CLAY TILE ROOF Sl STUCCO. GARNER GREY COLOR 52 STUCCO. LIGHTER GREY COLOR BI ExI .. R BRICN. __ TO GREY Pt E)OSIING PRECAST TRIMS. PAINT 10 WHITE u1 PREFlNISHED METAL COPING (GREY) N2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING (WHITE) M3 IXISIING METAL COPING. PAINTED WHITE AL1 NEW ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ONEW ALUMINUM -.R-NT SYSTEM O--IN. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM AL4 NEW ALUMINUM DOOR AND IRAME D1 HOLLOW METAL DOOR. PAINTED EAST ELEVATION 9, NOTE: TOTAL 140 SEATS IN THE i RESTAURANT FLOOR PLAN s -: vB _, _0 2e �: ,M:a•• w.�w ,� � .'�' ��C��.� Mme. ,- . �, .� s ,. � . ^� JJ' �,A• �' • l Orr3i l if . to Y4 14% '44 . 'kv 4A cm PWI dk"ft Kimley -Hom Suite 345N ® ® and Associates, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Parking Memorandum To: Cary Teague, Planning Director, City of Edina Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer, City of Edina CC: Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer, City of Edina From: JoNette Kuhnau, PE, PTOE Date: August 12, 2009 RE: Parking Analysis Walsh Title Site, 4820 W 77"' Street The purpose of this memorandum is to document the parking analysis and assumptions for the redevelopment/reuse of the Walsh Title building at 4820 W 770i Street in Edina. The existing Walsh Title site consists of an 18,400 square foot (s.f.) building and is zoned Mixed Development District -6 (MDD -6). Based on Edina City Code, 92 spaces' would be required. The existing building is proposed to be reconfigured to consist of a 140 -seat restaurant occupying 7,900 square feet, with the rest of the building (approximately 10,500 s.f.) assumed to remain as office space. The existing parking lot contains 80 spaces, as shown in the attached exhibit, and no changes to parking on the site are anticipated. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation provides an accepted method to compute parking demand based on actual observed parking counts at urban and suburban sites throughout the United States. Table 1 summarizes the analysis of parking demand for the proposed uses on the Walsh Title site. As shown, the peak parking demand for the two uses overlap in the 11 AM to 12 PM hour; therefore the peak parking demand must be provided for each use. ' Gross Floor Area (GFA) /200 Z Parking Generation, Third Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D. C., 2004. ® August 12, 2009 TEL 651 645 4197 Page 1 of 2 FAX 651 645 5116 A ( 3 Table 1. Walsh Title Parking Demand Anal sis. Based on the number of parking spaces on the Walsh Title site and the analysis of parking demand for the proposed uses, the 81 parking spaces meet the calculated demand No parking shortages would be expected on the site, even though it does not meet Edina City Code for MDD -6 zoning in terms of the total number of parking spaces provided. August 10, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Ali RE Land Peak Parking Land Use Location Use Size Units Peak Period Demand Required Weekday 284 spaces Office Building Suburban 701 10,500 sf 9AM - 12PM per 1,000 s.f. 30 2PM -4PM Sit -Down Restaurant Suburban 932 140 seats Weekday 0.33 spaces 46 (No Bar or 11 AM - 2PM per seat Loun e Total Weekday 76 spaces 11 AM -12PM Based on the number of parking spaces on the Walsh Title site and the analysis of parking demand for the proposed uses, the 81 parking spaces meet the calculated demand No parking shortages would be expected on the site, even though it does not meet Edina City Code for MDD -6 zoning in terms of the total number of parking spaces provided. August 10, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Ali SURVEY AND SITE PLAN 1-9 0�1 NA G� INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENI DOCUMENT NO. 4445988 FOUND IRON PIPE WITH CAP 0.4' WEST OF PROPERTY LID K v 20' w 64' BEARMIX SHOWN HFRBONARE aMW pl REDMI9®M NDURVlYNO. I= DESCRIPTION OF RECORD: TRACT S, OF LAND SURVEY NO. 1050, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARCEL AREA 77,567 S.F. (1.78 ACRES) PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4820 -4830 77TH ST. W. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55435 CJ J J a (ryW Q W to F W W � Z Z O W � d p � a) 304 C 8 S�_ 1 � ❑Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Memorandum Suite 345N 2550 University Avenue West St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer, City of Edina Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer, City of Edina From: JoNette Kuhnau, PE, PTOE Date: July 13, 2009 RE: Trip Generation Analysis Walsh Title Site, 4820 W 77`s Street The purpose of this memorandum is to document the analysis and assumptions used to determine whether a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) or a traffic study is needed for the redevelopment/reuse of the Walsh Title building at 4820 W 77`s Street in Edina. The City of Edina Transportation Impact Analysis Initiation and Review Policy states that a TIA is required for any development meeting any or all of the following criteria: • generating approximately 1,000 or more vehicle trips per day • generating approximately 100 or more vehicle trips in any one hour period • if associated roadway traffic is increased by 50% or more The Policy also states that when a TIA is not required, a traffic study is required in lieu of a TIA. A cursory trip generation analysis has been conducted to determine the impact that the existing and proposed land use has on the local transportation network. The Edina Gateway Pentagon Park Redevelopment Project is a mixed use development with office, retail and housing components on two sites along W 77`x' Street between TH 100 and France Avenue in the City of Edina. It is expected that the entire Pentagon Park project would be completed by the year 2017, and would include approximately 820,000 gross square feet (s.f.) of office and retail space and a 150 -room hotel on the Pentagon Towers site, along with 634 residential units and 29,000 gross s.f. of retail on the Pentagon Quads site. The existing Walsh Title site is within the Pentagon Park project area, but was not assumed to be redeveloped, as documented in the Overall Development Plant. The Walsh Title building consists of a single tenant office use of approximately 18,400 square feet (s.f.). The existing building is proposed to be reconfigured to consist of a restaurant occupying about 7,900 s.£, leaving the rest of the building (approximately 10,900 s.£) Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Edina Gateway, LLC. Pentagon Park Redevelopment Mixed -Use Community. Overall Development Plan, January 2008. TEL 651 645 4197 FAX 651 645 5116 All July 13, 2009 Page 2 of 3 vacant. No changes to parking or vehicle access of the site are anticipated. The existing site layout is shown in Figure 1. There would also be no changes proposed to the pedestrian or bicycle network as part of the reuse of the building. As a result, pedestrian and bike access and safety in the area are not expected to be impacted. There are currently Metro Transit bus stops on W 77th Street (eastbound and westbound) adjacent to the site, and no changes are proposed to the existing stops or service. Traffic generated by the existing office and the proposed restaurant were estimated using trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual2. The ITE Trip Generation Manual also provides directional trip distributions that give the percentages of vehicles entering and exiting the site based on the proposed land use and the peak hour of interest. No reductions in trip generation due to mode share (i.e., transit service), pass -by trips, or internal trips were assumed. The existing use in the Walsh Title building is represented by Single Tenant Office Building (Land Use 715). Table 1 below summarizes the existing trip generation. Table 1. Existing Trip Generation. Land Use Address ITE Land Use Size Units Occupancy Time of pay Trip Rate Trip Generation Total In Out Trips Trips Walsh Title 4820 W 77th Street 715 18,400 sf 100.0% Daily 11.57 213 107 107 AM Peak 1.80 33 29 4 PM Peak 1.73 32 5 27 Total 100.0% Dail 213 107 107 AM Peak 33 29 4 PM Peak 1 32 5 27 The proposed restaurant is a Sit -Down Restaurant (Land Use 932) and is assumed to be open for lunch and dinner. The trip generation based on both the square footage of the restaurant and the number of seats was evaluated. The data in the ITE Trip Generation Manual for land use 932 (Sit Down Restaurant shows that most of the restaurants were about 5,000 s.f. in area, with about 120 -150 seats. There are only a few data points around 7,900 s.f., and these sites appear to have 200 or more seats in a space of that size. Therefore, the trip generation calculation for the Walsh Title building based on square footage of the restaurant would result in an unrealistically high estimate of the number of trips because it is a relatively large restaurant in terms of square footage, but about average in terms of number of seats. As a comparison, the proposed tenant has an existing restaurant in St. Paul with 140 seats that they have estimated generates around 400 trips per day. Table 2 summarizes the proposed trip generation based on the new use. Z Trip Generation Manual, Eighth Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D. C., 2008. All July 13, 2009 Page 3 of 3 Table 2. Proposed Trip Generation. Land Use Address ITE Land Use'' Size Units Occupancy Time of Day Trip Rate . Trip Generation Total In Out Trips Trips Sit-Down Restaurant 4820 W 77th Street 932. 140 seats 100.0% Dail 4.83 676 338 338 AM Peak 0.00 " 0 0 0 PM Peak -:, 0'.41 57 34 : 23 ; Total Daily., 676. 338, 338 AM Peak 0 .i 0 " .. 0 . PM Peak 57 34 23 Dail =463— 33 =231= -29 —231— Net Trip Generation AM Peak, -4, PM Peak 25 29 -4 As, shown; the daily and peak hour trip generation totals do not exceed the,triggers set for a TIA. The AM peak hour trips are expected'.to be lower than in the existing: conditions and the PM peak hour is expected to have a small increase in the number of trips. The volume of left- turning traffic into the site from eastbound W 77`' Street at the Pentagon Tower signal was also checked against the projected 2009 Phase 1 Build volumes developed as part of the Pentagon Park Redevelopment. The eastbound lefft -turn lane at the signal has limited storage capacity (approximately 70 feet) and a significant increase in left-turn volume could potentially cause queuing issues on W 77'h Street. The projected 2009 Phase 1 Build analysis showed 85 eastbound left-turn vehicles , at the signal during the AM peak hour and 93 left -turn vehicles during the PM peak hour. Based on the trip distribution for the Gateway Study Area and the trip generation shown in Table 2, there would be expected to be a decrease of approximately 20 eastbound left turns during the AM peak hour and an addition of approximately 21 left turns during the PM peak hour. This volume of left-turn traffic is not expected to cause queuing issues at the signalized intersection, as the 2009 Phase 1 Build analysis showed the intersection operating at level of service (LOS) A/B in both peak. hours, with no LOS or queuing issues for the eastbound left -turn movement. An eastbound protected left-turn phase was recommended as part of the Phase 3 Build of the Pentagon Park Overall Development Plan, and this recommendation would not change due to the reuse of Walsh Title building. Based on the trip generation analysis, the proposed redevelopment will result in a net decrease in trips during the AM peak hour and a slight increase in trips in the PM peak hour. No changes to pedestrian access and safety or. transit access and service are expected. Therefore, .a full traffic study has not been completed as the intersection levels of service, safety, and other measures of performance are not expected to be negatively impacted. 3 Phase 1 assumes the completion and full.occupancy of Burgundy Place and the Aloft Hotel. 4 Gateway Study Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), 2007. a AMP �^ WEST 77TH �O e O4/BUS ROUTE L t #EXISTINGSIDEWAL 6 ] a FIGURE 1 EXISTING & PROPOSED CONDITIONS WALSH TIME BUILDING - 4820 W. 77TH STREET 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET I M-,—1 ^ : «J� aW Amdit Inc. e. o MEMORANDUM Plan-Review ENGINEERING ®EPARTIVIENT Be CITY OF EDINA DATE: August 27, 2009 TO: Cary Teague — Director of Planning FRONT: Wayne Houle SUBJECT: 48210 West 77th Street Engineering_has_revie_ wed_ the_above_stated_ project_and- offer - the- following,comments: Traffic Analysis See attached minutes of Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) for their comments. Please note that the ETC continued this item until their next meeting; this was due .to their. request for more information on parking within the site. Staff does feel that on -site parking. is not within the purview of the ETC and by City Code is the responsibility of the Planning Commission and the City Engineer. Survey and Site Plan: 1. There is no indication that the parking lot will be changed. The current parking configuration does not meet the City Code 850.08 Parking and Circulation, Subd. 5, A. Size 1. Full Size Spaces: the aisle widths need to be increased for any 90- degree parking. Overall the circulation is adequate: 2. No additional access to West 77th Street will be allowed on this property. This requirement is due to traffic volumes on West 77th Street, proximity to Computer Avenue and the traffic signal at 4930 West 77th Street. There is an existing cross driveway easement between 4930 and 4,820 West 77th Street. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. Thanks G:\Engineedng \General \70 - 79 Streets \4820 W 77th Street \Engineering Review\20090827 review of 4820 West 77th Street WH.doc 0 \1 ,eee MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, August 20, 20(' Edina City Hai, 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Geof Workinger, Jennifer Janovy, Warren Plante, Michael Schroeder, Tom Bonneville MEMBERS ABSENT: - Marc Usem, Jean White, Usha Abramovitz, Julie Sierks STAFF PRESENT: - - Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call.to Order The meeting was called to order by chair. Workinger. - II. Comments a. Chairman Comments None. b. Community Comments.-".. None. - III. Approval of Minutes _ a. Regular minutes of: June 18, 2005:.: IV. Old_ Business None-.:... . V. New Business a. Counties Transit._ Improvement Board Presentation — Mr. Peter McLaughlin, Hennepin County: Commissioner 4th District b. 4820 W. 77th Street Transportation Review Mr. Sullivan explained that a restaurant is being proposed for 4820 W. 77th Street, the Walsh Title site. He said of the 18,000 sq. ft. building, 8,000 sq. ft. would become the restaurant which would seat 140, serving lunch and dinner. He said the square footage and seating capacity is comparable to what the Planning Commission uses and parking and trip generation were calculated using 140 seats. He said no other changes to the site are proposed. Mr. Sullivan explained that daily trips would increase by 582, with a.m. peak decreasing by 14 and p.m. peak increasing from 32 to 75. He said the overall level of service would rem within an acceptable measure of Level of Service D or better. He said staffs concerns with tip„ proposal were: 1) serving breakfast in the future; and additional information were requested developer; 2) turning movements at the intersection of W. 77th Street at the traffic signal, which is shared by the Burgundy and the Pentagon Towers office building. Mr. Sullivan said the intersection is heavily used and staff wanted to be sure they did not accelerate the problems that were identified in two previous studies (AUAR and Edina Gateway Pentagon) by changing the site today; and 3) eastbound movement into the site indicated that the turn bay may need to be lengthen or change the timing of the traffic signal. He said staff has decided against changes at this time and instead will wait for future planned development in the area. He said the developer and traffic consultant were present to answer questions. Mr. Sullivan said staff's recommendation was "if so desired _by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the Transportation Study for 4820 W. 77' Street does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Commissioner Bonneville began the discussion by stating his opposition to the development based on the following reasons: the counts were underestimated; there_is_not enough parking for restaurant patrons and employees; handicap parkin sp g requires more ace; 400 trips per day seems low; and traffic could be backed -up onto_the roadway. Mr. Sullivan explained that internal circulation -_ : .is within; the purview of the Planning Commission and the restaurant being planned has a•similarsized one in St. Paul that functions efficiently. The developer, Chris Hickok of Wayzata_.,Propertes, said the restaurant, Little Schezuan, will have 16 fulltime employees. He said thefestaurant -is larger than-the average size with a larger kitchen. He also said there are 80 parking-spaces, including.. handicap. Mr. Hickok was asked if there will be take -out servica and. what impact this_ Would have: on traffic. He said there will be take -out but it was not. .factored in'separately. -J Otn dining -in patrons. Chair Workinger said he does not feel that tha :study can be:; approved.- without knowing the impact of take -outs. Mr. Sullivan said the ITt.f rip generation used is for k igh turnover sit down restaurants and take -out trip generation is included. He said:_it_could- be pursued further but he is not sure the numbers can be separated based`on the: research method used. Traffic consultant, JoNette Kuhnau, of Kimley - Horn „explainod that the analysis used in'. he traffic study is based on typical high turn- over restaurants such_as Apple-- Bee's. Commissioner Janovy asked about pedestrian movements in and around the site. Mr. Hickok sari there - are no plans at -this time � for sidewalks. He said as the Gateway development proceeds sidewalk will be added (the first phase is planned for 2013). Commissioner Janovy said she is familiar with a location where traffic spills out into the street because of limited parking and not knowing if the Planning Commission will make changes that will impact traffic makes.-.it difficult for the ETC. Commissioner Schroeder said the challenge for him is what is happening on the site and as a Planning Commissioner he will be looking at the site plan fairly soon. He said is not so concerned with the traffic numbers. Commissioner Bonneville made a motion to table the 4820 W. 77th Street Transportation Review until the developer can present supporting data. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Plante. 2 Commissioner Bonneville said supporting data would include turnover of parking; arrangement made by developer and adjacent property for reciprocal easement agreement for additional parking; and proof that there will not be lots of back -ups onto the roadway. Chair Workinger said this is may not be within the purview of the ETC. Commissioner Bonneville said he doe not believe there is enough parking and, therefore, the cars will not be able to get in and out adequately. Commissioner Janovy said this may not need to come back to the ETC because the Planning Commission and Council will have the ETC's minutes to review. Chair Workinger called for a roll call vote as follow: Commissioner Bonneville: Aye - Commissioner Janovy: Aye Commissioner Plante: Aye Commissioner Workinger: Nay _ Commissioner Schroeder: Nay Commissioner White: Absent =- -- Commissioner Abramvotiz: Absent . Commissioner Usem: Absent _ Commissioner Sierks: Absent (non - voting.) Motion passed 3 to 2. c. 8050 W. 781h Street. Transportation Review Mr. Sullivan said this property is located at "the northeast corner of TH -169 and TH -494. In said the developer is,-.proposing a':42,000 sq: =:it. law office with 140 employees. The traffic study was reviewed_tiy the city's traffic consultant; Chuck Rickart and also MnDOT because of existing plans to redevelop TH -169'- Which, placed--'constraints on the site due to the highway redevelopment. Mr. Sullivan.said. staffs concerns:afe: 1) development is close to the slip ramp which will -.: be;:.' eliminated.: when the highway -:' is redeveloped; and 2) interaction of the neighboring."property entrance with the new entrance. He said staff has requested that the entrance be a right -in /right -out only - because of the slip ramp. The slip ramp will be eliminated when-the highway is redeveloped and the developer would like to open the entrance to full access and :staff is recommending evaluating this at that time. Other mitigation measures are to move the. median closer to:. the entrance to facilitate the right -in /right -out only and provide proper signage. for such. - Mr. Sullivan said . staff's recommendation was If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the transportation Study for 8050 W. 78th Street does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system and that all necessary improvements to 78th Street shall be approved by the City; design and construction of the improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer." Mr. Sullivan said the developer, Dean Dovolis of DJR, and traffic consultant, Nicholas J. Erpelding was available to answer questions. Commissioner Bonneville asked if the developer considered a second entrance on the we side of the property. Mr. Sullivan said the site is challenged by the wetland parameters and 3 MnDOT will need 30 ft. to redevelop TH -169. Mr. Dovolis said they studied different entrance options and this is the only one that will work. Commissioner Bonneville asked if it is possible to have a two -lane roadway and Mr. Sullivan said yes. Commissioner Bonneville then asked if this could be done through cost participation. Mr. Sullivan said this may not be a reasonable request considering that the roadway is scheduled for redevelopment in the near future. Commissioner Schroeder made a motion to accept staffs recommendation as follow: "if so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the transportation Study for 8050 W. 78th Street does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system and that all necessary improvements to 78th Street shall be approved by the City; design and construction of tli�= improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Janovy. All voted aye. Motion passed. d. Safe Routes to School Study = VI. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) VII. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) a. Bike meeting minutes (Jufy_2009_.._ _ - -- VIII. Staff Comments a. 2010/2011 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects.. b. Promenade,!" provements c. Public WorksyAccomplist%ment Report d. Traffic Safoty Reports -C y & August-2009 Meeting adjourned. 0 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Bob Hawbaker [ bhawbaker @ci. bloom ington.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:36 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Wayzata Properties Application RE: Case File 2008.0014.09a Wayzata Properties 4820 77th St. West Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, The City of Bloomington has no comment on the proposed application to remodel the Walsh Title building for restaurant and office use. Sincerely, Bob Hawbaker, Planning Manager City of Bloomington 1800 W Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 55431 Direct: (952) 563 -8922 FAX (952) 563 -8949 www.ci.bloomington.mn.us 8/25/2009 To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor & City Council Cary Teague Planning Director KtiPUK 11KECUMMEN UA I ILKN Agenda Item II.B Consent ❑ Information Only September 15, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Final Development Plan and Variances for a new 5 -story Action � Motion office building at 8050 West 78th Street. ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance Deadline for a Decision: December 1, 2009 F7 Discussion Planning Commission & Staff Recommended Action: On September 2, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Final Development Plan and Variances. (See attached minutes.) Staff also recommends approval subject to findings and conditions in the attached resolution. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously recommended approval of the variances. See the conditions of approval within the attached draft minutes. Staff has appealed the Boards decision to allow the City Council to take action on the entire proposal. Information/Background: Attached are the following documents: • The resolution for City Council consideration. • The Planning Commission & Zoning Board minutes. • The original Planning Commission report and supporting plans. RESOLUTION NO. 200940 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR HELLMUTH & JOHNSON AT 8050 WEST 78TH STREET City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED 'by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Hellmuth & Johnson Law is proposing to build a 5- story; 35,000 square foot office buildi' g with three stories:of:,p arking- below two stories-,of office. 1.02 The property is legally defined as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Braewood Park Second Addition. 1.03 On September 2, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Variances. 1.04 On September 3, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the variances. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 With the exception of the variances, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2.02 The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape of the lot, and the significant wetlands located over the north half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the POD -1 district is .50. The proposed FAR is 31 3. The increase in the 'height of the building is due to minimizing the impact of the wetland by building a surface parking lot. The office portion of the building is two stories and the parking ramp three stories. 4. The building height is generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. There is an approved plan for an 8 -story building and 5 -story parking City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA; 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-80 ramp for the property to the west; and there are 4 -story existing office buildings to the east. 5. The site's location adjacent to Interstate -494. 6. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. 7. The increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Westwood. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan and Variances at 8050 West 78th Street. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Grading plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 6, 2009. Building elevations date stamped August 6, 2009 Wetland Impact plan date stamped August 6, 2009 2. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 3. Plans are subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. If approved by the District, the city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet District requirements. 4. Plans are subject to review and approval of any permits required by MnDOT. If approved, the city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet MnDOT requirements. 5. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site. e RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -80 6. Compliance with the.conditions required by the city engineer in his memo. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. All building's must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 9. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 10. Off - street provision of 9 bicycle parking spaces must be provided on site, subject to approval of the city engineer. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on September 15, 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 15, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -80 WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009. City Clerk ZB Meeting September 3, 2009 B -09 -17 Hellmuth & Johnson Law 8050 West 78th Street, Edina Request: Multiple variances Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Board the applicant is proposing to buil`d�a 5 -story, 35,000 square foot office building with three stories of parking below' two stories of officeat 8050 West 78th Street. The existing site is vacant. The requestrequires the following variances: 1. Side yard setback variances from 50 feet to 36 & 38 feet. (4th floor) 2. Side yard setback variances -from, 64,feet to 57 & 56 feet: (5th floor) 3. Building Height variance from 4; stories and 50'feet to 5 stories and 64 feet. Planner Teague explained there is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape of the site and the significant wetlands located orl the'site. Also, the high water table prevents the parking from being'constructed under ground. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the POD district is 50 %. The proposed FAR is 33 %. The height of the parking ramp and building are generally consistent with the 4 -story buildings to the east, and the appreved 8 -story building to -the west, which has not yet been built. The va,i' nce for the westside of the building.is for a minor "point" intrusion into the required setback, and only fo.r a small area on the east side. The building has been sized to minimize the impacts to the wetlands. The variance for the height is also caused by these circumstances. There would be a three level parking ramp below the two - stories of office. This is designed to avoid constructing a surface parking lot. Planner Teague concluded,that staff recommends approval of the variances for the Hellmuth & Johnson Law Officeat 8050 West 78th Street based on: 1. There is a'unique hardship to the property caused by the shape of the lot, and the significant wetlands located over the north half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the POD -1 district is .50. The proposed FAR is .33. 3. The increase in the height of the building is due to minimizing the impact of the wetland by building a surface parking lot. The office portion of the building is two stories and the parking ramp three stories. 4. The building height is generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area, and approved plan for an 8 -story building and 5 -story parking ramp for the property to the west. 5. The site's location adjacent to Interstate -494. 6. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. 7. The increase in.density could be supported by existing,.roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Westwood.' �> Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. City Council approval of the Overall and Final Development Plan. 2. This.variance will expire on September 3, 2016, unless the,city has,i "sued a building permit for the project covered by this variance or approved a time extension. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Dean Dovolis; DJR Architects Applicant Presentation Mr. Dovolis told the Board he is another hardship that could be/ r: A discussion.4-nsued withi"Boar approval of the project by the F Board/A,- X- Meber.VScherer moved varig staff co.nditon`s:, Member Da carried. `\" / t for questions--and added that in his opinion red is the taking of the land by MnDot. ti. Members in,agreement that.a hardship exists, noting nninq�Commission. pproval based on staff findings and subject to i seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion s Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 2, 2009 Page 6 of 11 Commissioner Staunton moved �o recommend approval- n amendment to the Overall Development Plan hand Site Plan Revievri based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions includin -t;e following additional conditions: • A sidewalk will be added tolthe fro #of the subject property at the appropriate time - Commissioner Grabiel seconde the motion. Commissioner Forrest com 1�e nted that to her it is,important not to lose the connectivity of the entire�project, adding requiring a,sidewalk,in front of the subject site is a good Ing. Commissioner Sdhroeder asked Commissiopers Staunton and Grabiel if they would accpt a friendly amendment stating, that: • The developer plant 11,additional tiees in anticipation of execution of thp'Proof of Parking Agreement - Commissioner Schroeder pointed out if the Proof of Paiking'Agreement is executed there would be a severe loss of trees and the 11 additional trees would off -set that loss ,.///commissioners Staunton arid,Grabiel- accepted that amendment. All voied aye ; emotion to approve arried "9-0. -� Final Development Plan with Variances ," Hellmuth & Johnson Law Firm 8050 78th Street West Planner Teague informed the Commission Hellmuth & Johnson Law is proposing to build a 5 -story, 35,000 square foot office building with three stories of parking below two stories of office at 8050 West 78th Street. The existing site is vacant and is zoned POD -1, Planned Office District. Planner Teague told the Commission request requires the following: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 2, 2009 Page 7 of 11 1. Final Development Plan. 2. Variances: a. Side yard setback variances from 50 feet to 36 & 38 feet. (4th floor) b. Side yard setback variances from 64 feet to 57 & 56 feet. (5th floor) C. Building Height variance from 4 stories and 50 feet to 5 stories and 64 feet. [` %, r Planner Teague concluded that staff recommendt"thE the Final Development Plan with variances for4he He Office at 8050 West 78th Street. The variances are as 1. A Side yard setback variances from 501 floor) 2. Side yard setback variances fromi4 feE 3. Building height variance from 4- stories 64 feet. tthe City C-,ouncil approve Imuth & Johnson Law at`to 36 & to 57 &,,51 The proposal meets the required standardsjor a variance, be (4th feet. (5th floor) 5- stories and se: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape of the lot, and the significant: wetlands located ;over the north half of the site. \ (�� fill r 2. The variance/would; meet the intent. of the rdinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the POD -1 district is .50�T�e proposed FAR is .33. /.;,4 '' -The ni crease in the heig ',of the building is due to minimizing the impact of thewetland,by building a surface parking lot. The office %portion of,the building is-two stories and the parking ramp three stories The buildingdleight�'is generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. There is an approved plan for an 8 -story building and 5- -�tory parking ramp for the property to the west; and there are 4- story existing/office` buildings to the east. 5 The site's location adjacent to Interstate -494. 6he high�water,rtable prevents the parking from being constructed under ground'/ 7. The increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as dete mined in the traffic study done by Westwood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 2, 2009 Page 8 of 11 • Site plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Grading plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped August 6, 2009 • Wetland Impact plan date stamped August 6, 2009 2. The property owner is responsible for replacing any,required landscaping that dies. 3. Plans -are subject to review and - approval "of the Nine, Mile Creek Watershed District. If approved b`y the District, the city',may require revisions to the approved plans to meet D'istrfct requirements. ! 4. Plans are subject to review and approval of,any permits required b MnDOT. If approved, the city may,require revisions to the approve plans to meet MnDOT requirements. 5. All storm water from this site mus6e.treated on-site. 6. Compliance with the conditions_ required by ,the city engineer in his memo. � �. 7. Compliance with the conditions required-.by the Transportation Commission. 8. All buildings must be built with sptinkler systems;, subject to review and approval of the fire',marsh�� V 9. Per Section 8500. Subd. 3.13' of the_City's;2oning Ordinance, a letter of credit,.., performance bond or cash /deposit must be submitted in /fheemount equal ibl_ /6-of the proposed landscaping., 10. _O.ff- street provis� ri of 9 \bicycle parking spaces must be provided on site, `subject to`approval of the city engineer. is, DJR Arch Commissioner Grabiel asked if`anyone from the Park Board reviewed the proposal. Mr .Jeague responded the Park Board did not review the development plans. Commissioner Risser questioned if the City has established setbacks from wetlands. Planner Teague responded the City has no established setbacks from wetlands, adding the City relies on the Watershed District to review projects where wetlands exist, pointing out a condition of approval for the project is approval from the Watershed District. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 2, 2009 Page 9 of 11 Applicant Presentation Mr. Dovolis addressed the Commission and explained the subject site is currently a vacant lot and Helimuth & Johnson is proposing to construct their corporate headquarters on the site. Mr. Dovolis explained that he worked very hard to preserve the wetlands and the project just received preliminary approval from the Watershed District at 5:00 PM this evening.. Mr. Dovolis gave a power point presentation highlighting a spects'of the proposal as follows: % • Structured parking - decreasing impervious surfaces • Rain water recycled for irrigation, a rain\-garden to'help with infiltration, ; a partial green roof deck and a white roof • Native plantings will be planted along the -rear of the property and more formal plantings along the front of the building, • Right -in and right -out only • Street improvements • Building has a east -west orientation - providing a narrow footprint, materials consist of cast stone cap, cast stone sills, utility brick, stone veneer, prefinished metal panels and cast stone window sills Questions and Comments from the Cominission Chair Fischer asked Mr. Dovolis if there is glass-in any of the openings in the structured parking. Mr. Dovolis responded in the affirmative — 50% of the structured parking -- contains gloss. Mr. Dovolis clarified that the front facade and the east arid west sides-of the building will,be glass with the rear elevation and lowestlevel den... Commissioner Risser asked Mr. Dovolis if there are exits on the rear elevation of,the building. Mr. Dovolis responded in the affirmative. Continuing, Mr. Dovolis-explained that at this time their intent is to leave the "rear yard" as natural as possible to eh' nsure that no disruption occurs in the wetland. 60NM nissioer Grabiel asked Mr.JDovolis if there is a sidewalk on West 78tH n Street>\Mr. Dovolis responded in the affirmative and with graphics pointed out the path oUthe sidewalks Mr. Dovolis noted because of the County taking it is difficult to plah�or a sidewalKalong the subject site. Continuing, Mr. Dovolis pointed out that the sidewalk is inconsistent along West 78th Street and it comes and goes in patches;,reiterating that in front of the subject site and the medical office building site a sidewalk can't be planned. Concluding Mr. Dovolis said after the taking and the reconfiguration of the interchange and West 78th Street it is possible a sidewalk could be added. Commissioner Risser questioned who conducted the traffic analysis — Mr. Dovolis said Chris Starwood with Westwood did the traffic study. Mr. Starwood Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 2, 2009 Page 10 of 11 said the proposed right -in and right -out and the restriping of West 78th Street would help with traffic flow. Commissioner Forrest commented that she agrees the right -in and right -out would work well for this site, adding that corner is pretty wild. Commissioner Forrest wondered if the building itself could reduce the speed of traffic in this area. Mr. Dovolis responded that that is possible, pointing out it is proven that obstacles do make drivers slow down. Commissioner Staunton questioned if the County taking was a factor in building placement. Mr. Dovolis responded in the affirmative. 'commissioner Staunton asked Mr. Dovolis if the building would be seen from the,golf course. Mr. Dovolis stated he doesn't remember seeing any buildings from „the,cou \e, adding there is a high ridge that surrounds much of the course. Commissioner Schroeder asked the depth of the rain garden and its drain. time. Mr. Starwood responded that the depth of the garden_is roughly 1 '/2 feet/18” with a drain time of 72 hours or less. Commissioner Schroeder noted it appears that on the landscaping plan Dogwoods are proposed, pointing out Dogwoods don't do very well in wet soil. Mr. Dovolis thanked Commissioner Schroeder for his observation, adding that would be;ohecked -, Commissioner Risser asked for clarifcation on the building run -off. Mr. Starwood explained the run -off process, noting �'the 'water run- off)from,the roof is pre- treated. Commissioner Forrest questioned what's going, on with the site next door — Planner Teague responded that site is approved-for an 8 -story building, adding they are required to return for Final Development Plan approval when they are ready to construct the building: Chair ischer asked.if there wa ne s anyo present in the audience that would like to speak td/this subject No one present: commissioner Carpenter stated that this proposal strikes him as a very positive development that is very sensitive to the environment. Commission Action Comm issioner \qrabiel moved to recommend approval of 2009.0006.09a for a Final Development Plan with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. Commissioner Risser said she would like.to encourage staff to adopt a wetland setback. Chair Fischer said that would be a good point to consider during the Zoning Ordinance update process. Chair Fischer called for the vote; all voted aye; motion carried. 9 -0 w9��r�L o e 0 .sy PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 2, 2009 2009- 0006.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Hellmuth & Johnson Law is proposing to build a 5 -story, 35,000 square foot office building with three stories of parking below two stories of office at 8050 West 78th Street. The existing site is vacant. (See location on pages Al —A4.) The request requires the following: 1. Final Development Plan. 2. Variances: a. Side yard setback variances from 50 feet to 36 & 38 feet. (4h floor) b. Side yard setback variances from 64 feet to 57 & 56 feet. (5th floor) C. Building Height variance from 4 stories and 50 feet to 5 stories and 64 feet. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A large wetland area, part of Braemar; zoned and guided open space /park. Easterly: Office buildings; zoned POD -1, and guided office /residential. Southerly: Interstate 494. Westerly: Medical Office; zoned POD -2 and guided office /residential Existing Site Features The subject property is relatively flat with mature trees and a large wetland. The site is 2.4 acres in size. (See pages A2 —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Office /Residential Zoning: POD -1, Planned Office District Site Access The primary access to the site would remain off 78�" Street. Traffic Westwood conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development. Westwood concludes that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See pages A23 —A44.) The site would be required to have a right -in and right -out only. The Transportation Commission considered the project at their August 20, 2009 meeting, and recommended approval. (See attached minutes at the back of this report.) Parking Based on the square footage of the building 172 parking stalls are required to support the project. The site plan demonstrates that 172 parking stalls would be provided. Building Design The building would be primarily brick with a stone veneer and metal fascia. (See pages A9 —A11.) The applicant will have a sample board that shows construction materials at both the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 32 overstory trees are required. The applicant is proposing to plant 39 overstory trees, in addition to the 15 Willows that would remain. Full compliments of understory shrubs are proposed around the building. A rain garden is also proposed on the east side of the building. (See page Al 5a.) Wetland Impact & Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions in his attached memo. There would be 976 square feet of wetland that would have to be filled to accommodate the building. (See page A18.) The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is the City's regulatory agency regarding grading, drainage and wetland impacts. Therefore, approval of this project would be subject to approval of the Watershed. If the District approves the requested filling of the wetlands, any conditions that they would place on the approval would also be required by the City. The City of Edina does not have a wetland setback requirement. If the Watershed denies the project, then the office could not be built. 2 Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for office use. A law office would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary.Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and- contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; The proposed plan is generally consistent with the previously approved plan for development of this site, which simply called for an office building. An 8- story building was approved for the site to the west. (Seethe original plan, minutes and staff report on pages A45— A49.) c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract, The proposed structure is similar in height to existing and approved buildings in the area. d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; and e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The.structure would meet the required floor area ratio. requirement for the zoning district, and would be generally consistent with building height in the area. There are 4 -story buildings to the east, and an 8 -story building has been approved but not built to the west. (See page A46.) A traffic study was completed and concluded that the roadways could'support the new office. . The Transportation .Commission approved the project,` subject to conditions. t) conforms to, the provisions of this Section and other- applicable provisions of the Code; and With the exception of the variances, the, proposal conforms to the Zoning Ordinance. g) provides a proper relationship be the proposed improvements, existing structures, :open space and natural `features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. 3 Compliance Table * Variance Requested Building Height & Setback Variances Per Section 850.04.Subd.l.F., of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests: 1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements?. Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. 4- City Standard Proposed Front (4th story) 50 feet 48 feet* Side (4th story) 50 feet 38 feet* Side (4th story) 50 feet 36 feet* Rear (4th story) 50 feet 100+ feet Front (5th story) 64 feet 56 feet* Side (5th story) 64 feet 57 feet* Side (5th story) 64 feet 69 feet Rear (5th story) 64 feet 100+ feet Building Height 4 stories or 50 feet 5 stories & 64 feet* Parking lot and 20 feet (street) NA drive aisle setback Over -story Trees 32 required 39 proposed (number is based on the perimeter of the entire site) Building 30% 24% Coverage Maximum Floor 50% 33% Area Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls — 172 spaces 172 spaces * Variance Requested Building Height & Setback Variances Per Section 850.04.Subd.l.F., of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests: 1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements?. Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. 4- r i There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape of the site and the significant wetlands located on the site. Also, the high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the POD district is 50 %. The proposed FAR is 33 %. The height of the building is generally consistent with existing and approved buildings >in the area. (See pages Al and A46.�) Also, given the spacing of buildings in the area, the height impact would be minimal. —T-he- variance = for -the- west - side -of the- building -is- for -a- minor "point" intrusion into the required setback, and only for a small area on the east side. (See page Al 3.) The building has been sized to minimize the impacts to the wetlands. There would be a,three level parking ramp-below the two- stories of office. This is designed to avoid constructing a surface parking lot. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The subject site is unique given its close proximity and easy access to 1 -494. There are few buildings in this area given the large wetland to the north. There are no residential buildings within this area north of I -494. Half of the site is encumbered by a wetland, which limits the buildability of the site. (See page A3.) These circumstances are unique to this property and generally not common to similarly zoned property. 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. In general, a.five -story office with would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The offices to, the east are four stories in height, and the west is two stories. However, the approved Preliminary Development Plan approved for the property to the west is for an 8 -story building with a 5 -story parking ramp. (See pages Al2 and A46.) Staff Recommendation Final Development Plan & Variances Recommend that the City Council approve the Final .Development Plan for the Hellmuth & Johnson Law: Office at 8050 West 78th Street. Approval includes the following variances: 5 1. A Side yard setback variances from 50 feet to 36 & 38 feet. (4th floor) 2. Side yard setback variances from 64 feet to 57 & 56 feet. (5th floor) 3. Building height variance from 4- stories and 50 feet to 5- stories and 64 feet. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape of the lot, and the significant wetlands located over the north half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the POD -1 district is .50. The proposed FAR is .33. 3. The increase in the height of the building is due to minimizing the impact of the wetland by building a surface parking lot. The office portion of the building is two stories and the parking ramp three stories. 4. The building height is generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. There is an approved plan for an 8 -story building and 5- story parking ramp for the property to the west; and there are 4- story existing office buildings to the east. 5. The site's location adjacent to Interstate -494. 6. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. 7. The increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Westwood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Grading plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 6, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped August 6, 2009 • Wetland Impact plan date stamped August 6, 2009 2 2. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 3. Plans are subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. If approved by the District, the city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet District requirements. 4. Plans are subject to review and approval of any permits required by MnDOT. If approved, the "city may require revisions to the approved plans -to- meet-MnDOT requirements. 5. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 9. Per.Section 850.10. Subd. 3.6 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 10. Off - street provision of 9 bicycle parking spaces must be provided on site, subject to approval of the city engineer. Deadline for a city decision: December 1, 2009 7 A-( City of Edina Legand Highli0hbd Feature House Number Label. Stn.t Name Label. 'I City Limits ANa YraLYp MaYNRY1a ^/ Cak. n ❑ Lk. N.m.. F Lake. El Park. ED P-1. 7607 7631 111 - een t6e..'M ` 7725 7777 fi Ef00 .000 1900 /. e6w - 1A. ter i PID: 1811621210011 / �o e � r 8050 78th St W tE Edina, MN 55435 `'� N% iwo A-( `�� � l�'• � N TTY" 1 � � e' a MY r � - ` �: *. � �`; - � � _ _ _ . ooll -T a ' ot —tip A; ir IF s. 9100 p'' ti. •' t a 8050 •� ' ' pop T/► me nm mw low 7507 Is07 Iasr 7725 7777 City of Edina �. ro PID: 1811621210011 8050 78th St W Edina, MN 55435 o e� '! • ����vtpprust' • lr)pn Legend House Number LAW. S"01 Name Labels ./ CIy Umlts Creaks ❑ Lake Names Lakes Parks Zoning ■ Aftj— na9m P-9D—1 YDDiix�D«.xPn,xn Dmma� ■ Moo 51— D— D,ar ® MDD a,.— -A O P•e . PDD 11 P9bn.n c9mnwoxDmrie -)I ® KO -i lPmnw Cnev�ss.x DsunY ® vcoa(vl...eewm.csos.c.a ® rolvwr9w9.ur om.ei 7 ro I (vxnnw ox� Da.b n rooa IPynnw oxa D m.c n ■ wD -r (vm,nw gnnaa+Dw.e -n MD ] IPbnnw —0-21 ® PAD)(P.rnnw q.caxn DS)raA ® P9DJIPxnnw A -.-D.) A ® PDD -S IP•nnw x.nx.n De9N -51 . P7A +IPYnnw S.nw N.ona�o -nl Ca (Ismgb D.. ^9 unn Dmre i ® a2(Dw9b Dwinq Una Dmrc51 ■ aYDlay.nMMwnM DUUCaI F7 P.—Is 2006 Aerial Pho)D APPLi CAN - NM T/VEr PROJECT DESCRIPTION & Explanation of Request Development The Hellmuth and Johnson, PLLC law firm is looking to relocate their office from Eden Prairie to the proposed project location near intersection of Highways 494 & 169 in Edina. The development will provide 35,000 square feet of office space and a prominent location. The five -story building is divided into three stories of parking below with two stories of office space above. All of the parking required for the office space is structured within the building; dramatically reducing it's development footprint and resulting in a negligible wetland impact. The project is requesting a variances for front and side yard setbacks as well as a height variance to 5 stories in lieu of rezoning the site to POD2 like the adjacent property to the west.The use of the site is consistent with the current zoning type and meets the density requirements for the exisiting zoning. Site Design• The existing site was a challenging proposition to develop. The wetlands occupy greater than one -half of the rear and western edge of the site, leaving a relatively narrow strip of land to build upon near the front property Iine.The project's essential aim is to meet the owner's building requirements and site the building in order to preserve the exising wetlands. In order to accomplish this, the project has structured its parking, thereby decreasing the impervious surface on the site by sixty percent, a decision that follows Edina's Comprehensive Plan which promotes structured parking to enable compact commercial developments and maintain open spaces. An added benefit is that the site maintains a landscaped front yard. The thin profile and east -west axis maximizes the.use of the buildable land and eliminates the need to infill wetland areas. The orien- tation allows the building to utilize daylight to minimize electric lighting. The foundation will be piers approximately every 30 feet — versus a conventional foundation that would require extensive soil correc- tions; this approach minimizes the amount and extents of site disturbance during construction, an important consideration adjacent to a wetland area. Site Considerations: Compact Design & Building Orientation The site is located adjacent to 494 among office buildings with large surface parking lots. In spite of the wetland component, the context is highly urbanized. The proposed development features a compact building design that both preserves open space and retains the wetlanc The building has an East -West orientation and a narrow footprint that allows for reduced energy use through daylighting. The parking is structured and is located within the building footprint to preserve open space. The site is located within 1/2 mile of two bus routes (570, 684). Stormwater Management and Landscape Due to the site's proximity to the wetland, the stormwater management plan and landscape features have been carefully designed to protect the site environment. The design exceeds city requirements for managing stormwater run -off. The stormwater management plan has been designed using BMP's for infiltration and run -off. Rainwater will be recycled for irrigation The site features a Rain Garden to help with infiltration. The rear roof deck features a partial green roof Pervious paving is used at walkways and driveway. Native, water-efficient, non - invasive plantings will be used on the site. Building Design• WyHELLMUTH JOHNSON 'StWOOCI S T, 0 N 'I E 'r' S A T L A 'N As A white roof will be installed to reduce the urban heat island effect and reduce cooling loads. Low -VOC materials will be specified in construction documents for carpet products, paints, sealants and adhesives and used wherever budget permits. The recycling area will be coordinated with the anticipated collection services for glass, plastic, office paper, newspaper, cardboard and organic wastes to maximize the effectiveness of the dedicated areas. While state law precludes smoking within the building, additional measures will be taken to prohibit smoking at building entrances and areas adjacent to fresh air intake for building systems. Traffic Summary: ATraffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been completed and is included as part of this Final Development Application. Based on this analy- sis, the AM peak hour conditions revealed no operational issues for both existing conditions and for post - development conditions (after the addition of the proposed site driveway and related traffic.) The analysis revealed a poor Level of Service and long traffic queues on westbound 78th Street West at the intersection of the 494 slip ramp in the existing PM peak hour conditions. Analysis for PM -peak hour conditions- after development of the site show degraded operations, as expected, with the addition of the site driveway and site generated traffic. Multiple strategies were investigated to address the existing queuing problem and to help mitigate the impact of the addition of the site driveway and traffic. The recommended solution in the TIA is to restripe 78th Street West from West Bush Lake Road to the 494 slip ramp intersection to provide two westbound lanes and one eastbound lane, preventing the blocking of westbound vehicles by the westbound left turn movement queue. MnDOT has reviewed the TIA and has indicated that they will not allow a left turn out of the development onto West 78th Street. In order to comply with the July 14, 2009 MnDOT letter, and in lieu of the mitigation described in the TIA with full access, a right-in-rig' h't- out access is proposed. This may be accomplished by extending the center median at the 494 slip ramp to the east, beyond the proposed site access as shown in the enclosed plans. It is understood that the site access will become a full access in the future when the TH1 69/1-494 interchange is reconstructed. Stormwater Management: Stormwater Management Plan has been completed and is included as part of this Final Development Application. More than half of the existing site is comprised of wetlands. Placing the office -use above three levels of parking has reduced the footprint of the site area. Permeable pavers are proposed for sidewalk areas to reduce the impervious footprint of the site. An infiltration basin is proposed to treat the stormwater runoff generated by the building rooftop and paved vehicular access areas. The infiltration basin contains runoff from the entire 1.0" event to meet the water quantity requirement of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. A filtration device is proposed to treat stormwater runoff from the roof and paved surfaces before it reaches the infiltration basin. This filtration device removes nutrients and sediment from the 2.5" storm event to meet the water quality requirement of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Refer the Stormwater Management Plan for details. july 24, 29 Revised August 6, 2009 Final Development Application — City of Edina Property Location — 8050 West 78th Street, Edina, MN Zoning — POD -1 Variance Request —Side Setbacks: The proposed Variance will: 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 210, Union Plaza, Minneapolis, MN 55401 T 612.676.2700 F: 612.676.2796 www.djr- inc.com Y/ N Relieve an undue hardship which was not self imposed or a mere inconvenience. Y The project is requesting variances from the stipulation that side yard setbacks equal the building height at the setback. The building height at the 4th floor is 48 feet, and the 5th floor it is 59 feet from average grade. The variances requested are: East Side yard (4th floor) — 36 feet at the narrowest position for 62'10 feet East Side yard (5th floor) — 56 feet West Side yard (4th floor) — 38 feet at the narrowest position with an average of 47 feet. West Side yard (5th floor) — 57 feet at the narrowest position with an average of 64 feet. The 5th floor steps back to generally accommodate the setback requirements. Please see graphics on pages 20 & 21 of the application & attached to this document. The irregular shape of the site and extent of wetlands minimize the buildable area of the site and generally determines the building location. The proposed plan stretches the building in the east -west axis parallel to 78th Street West in order to use the buildable land available and preserve the wetlands. The variance for the setbacks allows the building to avoid the wetlands, eliminate surface parking and maintain a well landscaped front yard. Without the variances a minimum of a third of the parking would be surface parked and a significant amount of wetland impacts would be proposed instead. In order to make the development of the site viable, a certain threshold of density is required. The proposed plan meets this density threshold in a manner that recognizes the natural qualities of the site, by preserving the wetlands, greatly minimizing impervious surfaces and maintaining a majority of the site's open space. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property Y in the vicinity or zoning district. The limited amount of buildable land on the site due to the wetland extents and the project's desire to preserve these wetlands and open spaces necessitated a long, narrow building brought a small degree closer to the front property line than the zoning code would typically allow. The adjacent properties with POD 1 & POD 2 zoning are much larger and have fields of surface parking surrounding their buildings. The limited buildable area on this site requires special consideration in order to maintain the wetlands that dominate the site. Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district Y The site has remained undeveloped though all adjacent properties have been developed due to the irregular shape and limited amount of buildable land. The neighboring properties do not have these development issues. Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or Y zoning district: The project is sited in a heavy commercial office zone and adjacent to a major highway interchange. The building will satisfy all other requirements of the zoning code with the exception of the height variance and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or adjacent properties. �0 WHELLMUTH JOHNSON- - WeslWtlnd L � � 111111 l f' :; i1 1 I n ��• Front Rendering - 78th St. W. i REaNf�) AUG 0 L 5i$ VVI nfif:l OTE' :TI IRE INC w._.y �.C�.. _ .. _ � ,PC• "l��s+.�y�Y y����yzk �y � �T-f yylt� -_ . _ ... __. Qi WHELLMUTH JOHNSON-- Nest -d F. 1 1111 it C 1% !. 1 1 A P' Rear Rendering Ni1:111TEC:TIAaE RJG. P.:. Aa, U 7 WHELLMUTH JOHNSON—, fttV ad .1, $1 1 h Panorama - View From Street - H. It DJR r ' .r 7 t � � VA, 11r I .i-� ..+ '+'� >< w,.. �^� .�..� ��'h }��ti.�. a �..�•.`y, f, 4� *, t •irk` �` . .,,� A. "4 .'9 � , .� F 54'_ t _ � a : �� r�S � • . � ` Ter X. r'R — �e lit •r. -mss �}'a'��$.. '� �'=rc - NO c X 6,9 WHELLMUTH JOHNSON,- Vestwod — Iuu Ml . r:: 61 1aw July 24, 2009 09- 0044.1 19 i DJR ___� �� ' » t ---------� Building Setbacks Ist Floor Plan nsLcxoVT* /o8NsOm~~ .�- -- -- --�-- �--�--�,� ' 0 | - - - - - - - - - �� -- - - ' | i � | MN Building Setbacks ' 4th Floor Plan ��_�_�_�____-� ' n � / | / - ---- ----- --- - | / . --=~� nnx"=aerW Building Setbacks - 5th Floor Plan DJR —F— 10' -8' HEIGHT LIMIT_ — — — I O � I `\ `\ C? r co I e�a w s t� Z z 38' -0� ° 7w of 1�7i'1 I 36' -3" AVERAGE GRADE Building Setbacks - Side Yard 0 10 20 W14ELLMUTH JOI- INSONn- V-t—d F I 1 11 1, 14 • i h 1 n 1. O ` ROOF OVERHANG AT CURVED - - - - - - - � PORTION OF FRONT FACADE I I IIII J \ -- -- -- July 24, 2009 = Luilding Setbacks - Front Yard M(:1-NTC— (:lI1RF IN[: MCI NTEC111RF IN(. I it I I • U2S 1 • 8x.8 d 1 •eJO.) •8x8 •Sao •810° I dm3 •/i .8x.6 I N n 083, I A I z�Z II , ex's Z o g w o ;•: 8x.9 - - - - -- oe32.o N8904400 E253.82 ___ _ ------ - - - - -- - -------------- 6] .0 OUND IRON PIPE T�.- ___-- --- -- -- -- e3c.) 851.6In , I T., •, RLS 15228 • ax 9 • em o 3 c • B307 eJ1. I es, 110 1 - DRAINAGE AND UTILJIY EASEMEN7 PE (' • e]zs / PER-", -a-'! • e3o] TREES I J BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDiT10N a I SJ 3320 e / es. o ]°-° -830,6 •ax.e 1 y / I lL • e3o.9 8306 Sal- � �� o euc. / V\ PR'C���y Lr.V r e // N •8x.9 �� \1� •830.8 •el 0 .e308 Q1Ow r J • e1o.e .031.7 , IJ J • 53'.D 0x.9 AwciQ •632.6 , 8.5 V x 810. .) Py �,. a/1 e' • 830.8 Mo. � < V / • 830 .8 . e]O.a I 4p �O7 _ 93C o •330.7 / • °31.2 • 530.8 `0101 � 630.7 831.0. •852.7 V BJII.]• 831.9 631.1 2 •Sao6 TREES •e•\f' 31.0 6, ,87.. ` •8315 .83o.a 630.2 .531.3 `4�� / • 1°31.0 - 830.5 •8313 _ (/_�y� 1 6 OE�NTE 1 p er 1u1ENj° wpb C eti�/ ( JJSS •031.2 , °• wL L •p•'Ml exie PRMTS�IONAL Sf •• �+•J JJNE 5, 2008 ` TREES n -. ° 4, 1e•TREE w1.a M1' 432.0 n 811.6 I �e t T�� 1�-`Ib • - '�rt2T 93.9 b. iJ1i •GOr . e]1.a -v, o- 9cz �.aJ aL • .z =.L". •' .,'r e•2a Iesz. Q >� e - ` 3 e3 .e S^s ° (yam. wEn9 \ + 366ww��tt •1 tia� �r- pSZ 10 e12y •,2w ror 8� �A e. .� C / T v co, i�?•7.}1a`5 851.8 •032.]` `•nc1yJ `} 8110oe JIeroT A] OT / • evs - //''''�� }j1?.y pp,, (�� r __,,rte // •'>rcT zs ']4cjR "• 25 `c ya , •wt JfC>mi 1ahy TREES °3s ,"• . " ":a S` ` vNi E3z.y y7.[`.yt' -].., / } . 0102 \ '•S a. a1 8,� J_, 0; 1�.� }'TCOT t � cor yw)` e `.'di wr / y e». O P,9 � cWa � ]0.9 �- �.. Al COT .6. ].1 ,5.O7�r 2 -9. T a \6A I 0 J "J� , IM2.0 �' 0 1+" \ E O C 4 ' \° - .. . - TREES ,.2 J or- l • 6]/, r C 3 6ATe ' aM+ 11 ° .> 3 \� IC20T CJ(-S'z c07 _ _ .i� pG NO \J . ex.r�� \•, {Sy�o / e,Q�,,,, E�y'e1�� 1 0 / eao.< I - / ---- -____-__ O 830.0 /� \ I AY. • 037.3 ( ', •COT 04'6T 256]5. - t/ ^ \�\ �j0` �`` �4'SrAF •T4y•\ y RIJ42 �..� re• I \, 1 Tea •B3i. ^e r i ✓ 'F. 'v; .f \1;6 OT tiry COI °Ja"£r� ./ • 6u.a /` .836.6 . u) e 3De `as,. � \fV I �9� 'k'>�1s +`ias, \ ]� �•' eu� ve 11 I@� TREES/ ^ \`L ,c) wz -.1 elr.6 ELI DGf r 13� -_` -` >c`' s> Jf 3 �3, ; � "�J•q6>.Q1z • � � ` `6J` , �'a r n p�12e1 `✓ �;��°°'� l ° ao],� I ••i175>1.�6 1 ( ,' � f ��J _ < \ ,r �J COo rC>[ n iw-nE i 7i Y>vD- a� f r7 A ' ' `�_:_ t .i > • ( '�' N• �� , I . a " $ MOW9Es6 N D 'xZ Of I waT Nt I e Sao, II.f O 0 �- "0 61 DRAINAGE AND _ 1�yti' OUND IRON PIPE 1 i ; � EASEMENT PER 9 Ew000 _�°J,1� vl/jN ".• ],c rp ° 1. ap .S• RLS 15228 (0.14w} 70.00 ,y` PARK SECOND ADOI nON s. ��S ��,• ' n.D - -x�Jiq -•en., -- -- �- - - -- - - - - -- ` cs'.1 8>E. 1]].f. -\ __ OO en .7 =)ei � wE' e]Y CON( cr P - \ °aT ° e f ePP. 37.5 S89 °0135 "W 196.1 'eJer� ]c n• e> _•asa.ay c .c9- tee• r] •83>.,CRfTf' y \ B.M.- ]C. - .w a Tc ° 3as >.\ 97.6. 637 8330 C.e EM.9 •= T �+JW ]s e3LJ e 7 CZe3].2 / V I / / �/ I /`� r� 1/M1NOU$ • 0363 �� 1s Age . ` ].6 '+ Rxi wATEa INw 639.: S Ce 5 �� SJ [ 'AS) 9 C \ \ „e r•eJ6., •a]) t SAN ls7+ .•. • nJ).e w SY15101 w a••- ce3]a 66 rMV.y 322. N� •B.M.e d OP -0.:].J ,LW -836.5 77.� TtC 01v. 6x.6 BITUMINOUS rNiv- 083229.6 NS) fF` f T�pP. B3S Wv.°3J.>NEJ 9iu' .T'f, IN _ _ _ _ _ --- _ _ -2- _ Ja7PfF 37 3��� 2 #830.0 Mv-ex0 hrr 'SON PLLC ATTONr1i F i S .A ! ,V July 24, eum ell.eva aer..awr s..iw, ne M b Mw. e.b. llppPF GOPHER STATE CNE CALL T- .1y I 651-.6/-WN Yn T.0 fA I�6F751 -1166 a—.9 TA.rIRA m 61001 (TI6Z WAarj v.pw4Rw.nMeT MA..R e6.1 ..ID.Ar. Gmua.. n wAL e..(D�wP wAe ee�.a.Ym r. Y.e.Y eOwea�iY ?NTH STREET tN' I On Ig0116[.6N15: M62 YIMYW AYp1A1/9LF�I@:61616➢ ML. a Planting Now 6nY.. Mum Meev.d ! Swervo Development NO Y A.eest N.nh 6dY Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office Edina, Minnesota Umdmpe Plan I�0"/W a M .a ea aw. 6 a 6 L J Site Development Summary STE ADDRESS: 8050 75TH STREET WEST STE Alin• 105,587 SF (2.12 ACRES) E30STING GREENSPACE 105,430 SF (66.63) PROPOSED GREENSPACE 77.605 SF (7&7111) / ZONING: BANNED OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1) / SET6A0( REOGFADMNM BUILDING PAF50NG / FRONT BLDG HT. 20' / FEAR 20' ;w OR BLDG HT. 1 / . SIDE 20' p' PROPOSED LIM OFFICE EIMDING S12E 312,000 SF (VERIFY WITH ARCIOTECT) / FAR 0,10 / BALDING COVERAGE 2111 JI / E705TINC WETLAND If If /\ < l / E10SRNG WETLAND /. . �� R- NINO IIIAT / PROTECT E705RF LNOHT POLE I PROPERTY LII 1' -WIDE SO RANK (PERM`" " PAS) ° F L AW OFFICE / PARKING LEVELS 2 OFFICE STORIES FFE= 836.85 -r\ IHNSON PLLC ATTOAwEY i AT LAAf FLUSH CUM AT SDEWALIO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a.1r I I T Z \ ' N �I I I I , I � I I HNDOT R1 -I TOP 30 X3W CONNFRCIAL ORIMMAY FxmIY STANDARD 1 -I July Erasion Control Nota 1. SILT FENCE WILL BE DISTILLED AROUND SITE IN ALL FILL AREAS AND LOCATIONS WHERE STORY WATER RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE SITE. PRIOR TO ANY EOMCAVATION/Wa=CnON ACTIVITIES. 2 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE COAL BE KSTAUlED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. S SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL' THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLUNC ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PRO.ECT AREA TE CONTRACTOR SMALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT UMIIFD CATCH BASDI INSERT$ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BUI NKET. AM SILT FENCE. CONTROL SMALL COMMERCE WITH GRADING AM CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIMUTY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REOUDED TO PREVENT EROSION AM THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTORS METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IM PROVEMDM ANY DEPOSITION O' SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR ETDSTINC PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STOW HALL BE SEWERS OR SWALES S REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AFFECTED AREAS SMALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SMALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. CONTRACTOR SMALL INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION (WIMCO OR EOUNALENT) AROUND ALL CATCH BASIN ORATE INLETS, AFFECTED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION. i ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACVWTES MUST BE RESTORED WITH SEED AM MULCK SOD. WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR BE HAM SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. S. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF i1 OR GREATER RESTORATION WITH SOD OR WOOD FIBER BLANKET IS REQUIREM 7. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR MAULING SHAL BE KEPT FREE NE SOIL AND DEBRIS STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE COMPLETED DAILY S SWPPP SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON STE FOR FEMEW. / / SENT FENCE / SCOUR STOP TRANSITION MAT AT WEIR OVERFLOW / / LAW OFFICE �m 3 PARKING LEVELS 2 OFFICE STORIES FEE= 836.85 ` �A— emn e SILT FENCE (TIP) PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION ON DOWNSTREAM MANHOLES DURING . - CONSTRUCTIOM (TYP) :)HNSON Pr-LC A T T 0 r KEYS AT LA'.8 RETAKING WALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 417 July ~ 78TH STf�EET W J0HNSONPL« a7 T 3 H dE'f5 A T L A 4(4 I I I I I I 48' -0' I SETBACK I I I 787H SHEET W Setbacks - 4th Floor Plan July`24, 2009 Build 09- 0044.1 / lo�-------- - - - - -— \\ 1l MN Dot �J proposed curb line 787HWREFT W Building Setbacks - 5th Floor Plan a -_-7 • i 20 DJR ARCHrrECTURE INC. 78TH SME17 W g Setbacks - 1st Floor Plan ON Pt« 01iNEYS AT LAW A • / O. I / I Ito, �8" I SETBACK / / t c fC -y, Lyd? r ��„j._yn r'tiv '.� s ri•fS _- . �` �, a 36 -3" / BUILDI ( i *:et r, C1 - ... L 17 4'x,4:, yi 17. f rn+r� � Y a•4 � .- .. . , .� Ilk r7 \�� o C? _ Z c cn c cn -4 0 MN Dot proposed curb line .' 78TH 37T�T W . Building Setbacks - 4th Floor Plan R Ada . ,July 24, 200 I I i 787h' 87AM17 W Building Setbacks - 1st Floor Plan ® HELLMUTH O J HNSON Westwood Aak i i /e b, / 1 yiC '""ys5t \_ r m �ln MN Do[ — proposed curt :i► Edina, Minnesota DIV 1 Z a TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office Edina, Minnesota July 23, 2009 Prepared for Swervo Development Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Project No. 20091058 �a� I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office Edina, Minnesota REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Lg � July 23, 2009 Nicholas J. Erpelding, P.E., PTOE Date License No. 44582 W r BACKGROUND .................................................... .:.................... ..............................1 PURPOSE.................................................................................. ..............................4 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................ ..............................5 FUTURE CONDITIONS ........................................................... ..............................6 TripGeneration ........................................................................ ..............................6 Trip - Distribution ...... -- - -- 6— Proposed Driveway Sight Distance .......................................... ..............................6 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS ................................. ..............................8 2009 Existing ........................................................................... ..............................8 2009 Build ............................................................................... ..............................9 MitigationStrategy ................................................................. .............................10 Operational Analysis Conclusions ........................................... .............................12 RECOI\EWENDATIONS .......................................................... .............................14 APPENDIX............................................................................... .............................15 W- i ■ 0 ■ r BACKGROUND Swervo Development plans to construct a 42,000 s.f office building in Edina, Minnesota. The project, currently named Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office, will be located near the I- 494/TH 169 interchange, on West 78`h Street adjacent to the slip ramp to I -494. The site location is shown in Figure 1. The proposed building will be five stories; two stories of office space and three floors of structured parking. The preliminary site plan for the project is provided on the next page as Figure 2. v e?. S v, m m i - - 1\11 II Figure 1 Location M N SITE _ _ f Source: Google Maps Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office lh a4 o $ t to Qy ; 3 i s a �* - i S Or Source: Google Maps Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office lh a4 L 1" 11 N.. x.larA AyBYIP• GOPHER STATE ONE CALL .. uI- 1sA -om] Site Development Summary _ _ _ LOT IwE LM c xuExr Ix+E j s[[A. -SS 11-7aT1 STREET IB].se] v I].n A aYaSsT) LW .-: IVrl Y MTNQ art Aua —__ _ _ —__ C$IT I-SED ar]xsP••• n.Tm IF ]ONNG; -.1. amQ OVINT. (Pm -I) u[n1 1 - - - YTBAOI 'EgNR(V(NTI PAR xw G DR BLDG r . ON . NT. w, - - . - - . - - --- - --- - - - - • SITE uonwc AT 0' IO SIDE ]0' ON a00. nl. / - - - BaunD / Pm I rxlPaBN VSE• Volts + / ...W..1. a.].m0 Y IHRYT MM 41[NII[CI) FAN. 6m // V:0\ V 1 BuwwO coHRAQ ]aP - /] II / / tulnx0 T4MNV � Ytin / I I I / EOSMG Rivu10 1 - I I _ I rzCi PR nAG I I - nm[RTrtuni _ < (RW[AaL : -OT BRwAU PAHR57 .1 DRAFmxR[XI LAW OFFICE i 3 PARKING LEVELS A., 2 OFFICE STORIES RETASAMIT FFE= 836.85 A_ M (RR ITEw w Era PAHR! ) s- saF ............ General Site Notes B<DOwNGIdI, YOWElOTA. OCIWLP 10. ]00). ]. LDlanaxs Arm ¢Iwnaxs v Ew 1. Ilvaalu•xT Awo SITE u ON. RAN ARE APPP OAEA CON .¢ r1 .II .1 SITE —ION. A S Peon m ucxvxna�cwsl�aLCllul. c AxT D1soaPAxo[s ARE LOEA Excr1¢RES11aBD BE rwlnm wumumT. OnI[nwYx�rtDAN, TO FAQ Q - ITS EIFE- - OF Blaawc uMl 1. REFER TO AARCMAIEE- XPa ! [VII EXACT 11-IN. UY[x90N! AN. LOCA 9. ALL [uPB RAVB 91AllOBE .B FEET (TO FAQ Q ¢wB) IARL55 OMLBNY B. ALL E1B10 Ax0 CVIIEA - BE BSI] V1-, OBEAMY XD1E1L ). THE C�IRKr SNAIL BE RESPONSBILr 1. PROwDINO ANO YAWTwNwV O W AS BARIN -S. IN,— SIDS, OwECT.- SIGNS, (Z Ma_ C R ME uDHw[xT VI n1AIF1C MH[PC N[QSSMT. Ou [Y OEN[[6 SHALL 9E AP I - BT M[ ., AN. .... .- 1 TTT r CmTRQ OENQS S Cv6md TO APPRVPNAIE WIDOr SINWAI B. and - PAHYENI MO -.E. R[T0111 TO BE IN K[VIB]AXQ MM RECOY4ENDAPOIa BP IX[ QOrzEMPGL ENOMER. CONSIRRUCEON ANLD 1 CIALL ffl-T- -- l0 A-. PREDPLAITI R. ATA. -I - ENT.S. Signage and Striping Notes 1. m�il)opIFNTE S11HDAPOt OFARiI11iE FIA MAAN- ON UNI- 1-FT1 CW1 OEwQ! ("Tl E 1 PARNIIG LOT SIwwNO SNAL1 BE a- - CDLDP Mu IYD COATS OF PM11. iRaC1011 9N1] PAW I -I- .-ON. IRARK APRONS As voRFl IN MI[ (Iw0 FLATS) ]. ACQ— PMUNO PIED RR AOA COOL CONINACTOI ]HALL PAwr IN[ IN [ANAE.NAL ST1w0. OF ACQ-- W EA- A[TS- SIAM IN B Mnl wn1E -11 1- COATS OF 1-1 [Rl KIOP SIIA¢ 1-1 ML wORD9Rl'x0 PARVdO' w [A[x K[[SSIBLE ISIE AOIAQnI 0 Ax AtS[SSIBIE 9'I IN MITE ¢irtAS 4Baluu 1]" w x0011. C011.TNTEE Ew9NG MOLAREDBOE -TTOFCS NNESTAER"POS ISCNOT MO¢CRCCIEO[BTR SS Ali �P YNIE PNNrzn STEP - w MRrz PAINT (lRo 6 SlOVEBAPS ::01"M"' CmiTME IIIVU olll60cnoxw' 1RW911RRal OBFTNL[N TEO w[' on l NL SIOIi Pl.SQO IB" BENNO IK BAm Q mPB uME55 On1ERMY ortD. Site icgend _..___ .__... _ _ _ _.. _ ________ _ _ _ LOT IwE LM c xuExr Ix+E -- Q.._.. oaB AxD aTT¢I OIT MOT IT N RR 1-1 ETABAK wALL ; - [xc1 -© COxOTEIF -E.T u[n1 ® 9DEwALN (PERUfIm[DVAPwIS7 Y40Ta Q P ND „A¢! pl Puvmwm� • SITE uonwc - n• PoBCRCPVIF - - - BaunD / Pm J 78T STREET W � 494 SLIP RAMP .. - ..... ,, nDY�R�f IABHwAT EXIR.N� RP o,T l.11 10 R.I. W M[ ST�R[C Epw iOR .. ...' SIANBARD RATE Sm. . L ]0• 1a NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Yllastiacood �� lw OnPw RR�I Rw.r Swervo Development n[14 -N..k6 .>m Same�slla EWesM 61181 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office Hdina, Minnesota Site Plan FIGURE 2 pr 06%111/09 BE. a v 8 I I Access to the site is proposed via a single driveway on West 78Th Street, approximately 160 feet east of the West 78`b Street/I -494 slip ramp intersection. The driveway would be approximately the same distance from the westerly driveway of the Braemar Office Park complex neighboring to site to the east. This driveway location is constrained by extensive wetlands on site (see Figure 3). Further discussion on the operations of the access points is provided in the Traffic Operations section of this report. Figure 3 On -Site Wetlands cam::- -- - .: - - - - - -- . r' = � .............. -------- - - - - -- 7 r: ... � ..... / .: 1 ...... - is . J w _:.'•'� ..�: �:S. \ \ _ .' '~`•�4 ��_ 26 440 St BUILDING 7L •l -�l -.t l ;Ii I 78TH 577725ET W Development and occupancy of the site is expected to occur within the next year. The proposed sole end user, Hellmuth & Johnson, is an established law firm with slightly fewer than 100 employees. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 3 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office %� '2 rV PURPOSE West 78`h Street was observed on two separate occasions while preparing this report. Westbound queues were noted fi-om the 494 slip ramp back several hundred feet during the PM peak period on both occasions. The queuing appeared worse on a rainy day, where rain- related congestion increased diversion from nearby primary arterial roadways. Figure 4, a screen shot from the traffic model used to analyze the operations of the roadway network, provides a representation of West 78'h Street queuing on a typical (non- rainy) afternoon. Figure 4 Recurring Afternoon Congestion West 78t' Street is primarily a two -lane, two way roadway. At the 494 slip ramp, a westbound left turn lane is provided. Approximately 250 feet in advance of the slip ramp intersection, the roadway becomes wide enough for westbound through vehicles to pass the westbound left turn queue. The primary purpose of this TIA is to address the issue of the recurring congestion on West 781h Street, and the potential added impact of adding a site driveway within the congested segment. The recommended solution of restriping West 78`h Street to a 3- lane roadway with two westbound and one eastbound lane is presented and discussed. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 4 Helimuth & Johnson Law Office ka� ■ 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Manual turning movement traffic counts were performed on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 from 7:00 — 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM at the West 78`h Street /I -494 slip ramp intersection. Based on the count data, the AM and PM peak hours of traffic were identified as 7:30 to 8:30 AM and 4:30 to 5:30 PM. The PM volumes, shown on Figure 5, are significantly higher than the AM volume, making the PM peak hour the critical peak hour for design as demonstrated in the Operational Analysis Results section. Year 2008 AADT on West V' Street, as noted from the MnDOT website, is 8,000 vehicles per day. Detailed count information is provided in the appendix. Figure 5 Existinq PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Roadway Geometry Roadway Geometry was verified by an inventory conducted on June 25th, 2009 by Westwood Staff. I West 78`h Street in the vicinity of the site is an undivided, two -lane, 36 -foot wide, 40 mph roadway. Parking is prohibited. As mentioned earlier, at the 494 slip ramp intersection, the roadway widens to provide a westbound left turn lane, along with a median on both the east and west sides of the intersection. A yield sign is present to remind westbound left turning drivers that they must yield to oncoming traffic. ITraffic Impact Analysis Page 5 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office a 0 k 3b FUTURE CONDITIONS Trip Generation The trip generation rates utilized in this study are based on those documented in Trip Generation, 8th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 summarizes the increase in weekday daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trips estimated for this study. The ITE "General Office" land use was assumed for the purposes of estimating trip generation potential for the redevelopment site. Two independent variables were considered in the calculations: square footage and number of employees. Both the average rate and fitted equation calculation methods were considered as well. The combination chosen, to provide a slightly conservative estimate, was the use of the fitted curve equation for the "number of employees" independent variable. 100 employees were assumed. Table 1 Trip Generation Estimates Land Use ITE Land Size AM Trips PM Trips Daily Trips Use Code Enter / Exit Enter / Exit Enter / Exit General Office 710 Em 1100 ees .59/8 17 / 81 223/223 Total 59/8 17/81 223/223 Trip Distribution The trip distribution pattern was estimated based on a roughly even distribution of traffic to the east and west, with slightly more traffic distributed to /from the west based on fact that the current office space for the Helhnuth & Johnson law firm is located approximately one mile to the west. 60% of traffic was assumed to travel to /fi•om the west, with the other 40% to /from the east. Of the 60% assumed traveling to the west, two - thirds (40% overall) were assumed to use the 494 slip ramp, with the other one third (20% overall) continuing north on McCauley Trail toward the TH 169/Valley View Road interchange. Build volumes for the critical PM peak hour are illustrated in Figure 6. Proposed Driveway Sight Distance A qualitative check of the available sight distance at the proposed driveway location was made. Sight distance to the east along West 781h appears adequate. To the west, a large tree currently obstructs the view (see Figure 7). Current plans call for this tree to be removed as part of development of the site to provide adequate sight distance. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 6 Hellmulh & Johnson Law Office 431 Figure 6 Build PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes a vz�� Figure 7 View from Proposed Site Driveway to West along West 78th Street Traffic Impact Analysis Page 7 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office k3a I Ir OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS Using the roadway geometric and traffic volume data described above as input, traffic operational analysis was performed using a computer traffic model. The software 1 used for the model was the industry- current Synchro /SimTraffic 7 package, which uses data and methodology from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, published by ' the Transportation Research Board. Two fundamental outputs from the model can be used to characterize traffic ' operations reasonably well. The first is Level of Service (LOS), a letter grade ranging 1 from "A" (best) to " F" (worst). Generally, Level of Service D represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour in the Twin Cities metro area. The second is queuing. A queue is a line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. While an intersection may be reported as operating at an acceptable level of service, queues from the intersection extending to upstream intersections or driveways could create a potential safety issue. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with a 5% chance of occurring during the peak hour, is considered a standard for design purposes. The SimTraffic component of the Synchro /SimTraffic software package was chosen to report both LOS and 95th Percentile queuing results. SimTraffic was chosen for its 0 suitability in gauging the impact of vehicular queuing interactions between closely spaced intersections, and because of the more precise calibration of the model to •'0 match observed conditions that be accomplished. Results reported are the average of five simulations. Analyses were conducted for the AM and PM peak hour conditions for Existing and Build in 2009. Results of the operational analyses are summarized below, by i scenario: 1 2009 Existing 1 Analysis of 2009 Existing conditions was performed in order to properly calibrate the model to match observed "real- world" conditions. No unusual calibration was required to align AM peak hour conditions in the model with those observed in the field. The results for Existing AM peak hour conditions are summarized in Table 2. Detailed results are available in the Appendix. ll ;J Traffic Impact Analysis Page 8 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office ,1 H3 Table 2 2009 Existina AM Movement Level of Service 95`" Percentile Queue, in feet EB A 0 WBL A 43 WBT A 0 Intersection A _ The model of PM conditions required some adjustment to help bring the model close to resembling observed conditions, due to sensitivity of the performance of the westbound left turn movement. The adjustment made to bring the model into alignment with observed conditions was to change the turning speed on the westbound left turn movement to 25 mph from the default value of 15 mph. The result of this change, as illustrated in Table 3, is a reduction in modeled westbound queuing from 1,350 feet to 450 feet, more closely resembling observed conditions. Table 3 2009 Existing PM Model Calihratinn Westbound Left Turning S eed Movement Level of Service 95`h Percentile Queue, in feet 15 mph EB A 4 WBL F 100+ WBT F 1,344 Intersection E _ 25 mph EB A 13 WBL E 100+ WBT B 456 Intersection A _ This result could also help further explain why queuing becomes more problematic on rainy days. Not only are traffic volumes likely higher, due to diversion from the principal arterial system, but westbound left turning drivers are driving slower, and therefore need longer gaps in eastbound traffic to be able to make their maneuver. 2009 Build Using the calibrated model (PM conditions only), analyses of 2009 Build conditions were completed next. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 9 Hellmuth 8 Johnson Law Office A3�- Table 5 2009 Build The AM peak hour operates at LOS throughout the model. No queuing issues are present. The PM peak hour model experiences an increase in westbound congestion compared with existing conditions. The primary reason for the increase is due to westbound drivers pausing to allow vehicles exiting the site to enter West 781h Street. Though this courtesy reduces delay for motorists exiting the site, it degrades the efficiency of the westbound left turn movement at the 494 slip ramp intersection. The efficiency is lost due primarily to the short distance (160 feet) between the driveway and the slip ramp intersection. In the model, it appears that sometimes while a driver is exiting the site, an acceptable gap in eastbound traffic is not fully utilized by drivers turning left onto the slip ramp. This is not as big of an issue for the driveways located further east on West 78`h Street, because a longer queue is waiting to utilize available gaps. Mitigation Strategy To mitigate both the existing queuing observed on West 78`' Street, along with the addition of the site driveway and associated traffic, several options were investigated. The first was gaining access through the Braemar Office Park parking lot and driveway. Swervo Development was unable to negotiate access through the adjacent private property (Braemar Office Park), however. Second was an all -way stop at West 78th/494 slip ramp. This solution was found to cause extreme delay and queuing for eastbound traffic, even with the addition of a second eastbound approach lane. The next strategy considered was signalization. Existing traffic volumes at West 78`h and the 494 slip ramp were used to assess whether a traffic signal would be warranted, per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). As shown on Figure 7, Existing PM peak hour volumes meet the 100% peak hour warrant, assuming only the eastbound through and westbound left volumes are counted for the major and minor approach totals, respectively. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 10 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office & 35' Level of 95`h Percentile Queue, in feet Intersection Movement Service AM / PM (AM / PM) EB A/A 0/312 West 7 WBL A / E 56/100+ Street 4 WBT A/ A 0/160+ Ramp Slip Ra Intersection A/C - EB UT A / A 49/97 West 78� WB T/R A / F 3/1,675 Street and Site SB L/R A / F 27/265 Access Intersection A / F - The AM peak hour operates at LOS throughout the model. No queuing issues are present. The PM peak hour model experiences an increase in westbound congestion compared with existing conditions. The primary reason for the increase is due to westbound drivers pausing to allow vehicles exiting the site to enter West 781h Street. Though this courtesy reduces delay for motorists exiting the site, it degrades the efficiency of the westbound left turn movement at the 494 slip ramp intersection. The efficiency is lost due primarily to the short distance (160 feet) between the driveway and the slip ramp intersection. In the model, it appears that sometimes while a driver is exiting the site, an acceptable gap in eastbound traffic is not fully utilized by drivers turning left onto the slip ramp. This is not as big of an issue for the driveways located further east on West 78`h Street, because a longer queue is waiting to utilize available gaps. Mitigation Strategy To mitigate both the existing queuing observed on West 78`' Street, along with the addition of the site driveway and associated traffic, several options were investigated. The first was gaining access through the Braemar Office Park parking lot and driveway. Swervo Development was unable to negotiate access through the adjacent private property (Braemar Office Park), however. Second was an all -way stop at West 78th/494 slip ramp. This solution was found to cause extreme delay and queuing for eastbound traffic, even with the addition of a second eastbound approach lane. The next strategy considered was signalization. Existing traffic volumes at West 78`h and the 494 slip ramp were used to assess whether a traffic signal would be warranted, per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). As shown on Figure 7, Existing PM peak hour volumes meet the 100% peak hour warrant, assuming only the eastbound through and westbound left volumes are counted for the major and minor approach totals, respectively. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 10 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office & 35' I- Figure 7 Peak Hour Siqnal Warrant ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ •■ ■■,� - •- WORT, 6. 10 M �1 bbhq-qbbqlbq- T NOW- 4 ■ ■ ■ES MN`0149.z Boom ■ EMO ■���� NOMENEEMEMEM;M 150 100 00 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 MAJOR STREET -- TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'NOTE: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor - street 600 U 500 Fhnrc 1G3. 11"arrmu ? - Peafi Hao Q Source: MnMUTCD O w a 400 Operationally, traffic modeling showed a traffic signal to provide adequate LOS with �a no queuing issues. Despite the fact that the intersection meets a signal warrant and u~i ® location. The reason is that congestion along this segment of West 781h Street is a LU 300 0 0 ® existing 494 slip ramp will likely be removed; and second, the amount of traffic using 5 o zoo ® the interchange project remains unknown, it is still expected to occur when funding is identified. Constructing a traffic signal as a temporary solution is not cost - efficient. Shifting the site driveway was also considered. As noted earlier, the driveway cannot 100 be shifted west of the slip ramp intersection, due to the existence of wetlands. Li Shifting the driveway further east within the property boundaries is a possibility. The traffic modeling completed for this alternative did not show an appreciable difference from the proposed location, however. A disadvantage to shifting the driveway further = 4 Figure 7 Peak Hour Siqnal Warrant ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ •■ ■■,� - •- WORT, 6. 10 M �1 bbhq-qbbqlbq- T NOW- 4 ■ ■ ■ES MN`0149.z Boom ■ EMO ■���� NOMENEEMEMEM;M 150 100 00 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 The mitigation measure that is recommended, again both to address existing recurring queuing and help improve operations after the addition of the site driveway access, is restriping of West 78th Street from the slip ramp intersection to West Bush Lake Road to provide two westbound lanes and one eastbound lane. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 11 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office MAJOR STREET -- TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'NOTE: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor - street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor - street approach with one lane. ® Fhnrc 1G3. 11"arrmu ? - Peafi Hao Source: MnMUTCD Operationally, traffic modeling showed a traffic signal to provide adequate LOS with no queuing issues. Despite the fact that the intersection meets a signal warrant and that it could be operationally viable, a traffic signal is not recommended for this ® location. The reason is that congestion along this segment of West 781h Street is a ® temporary condition. When the 494 /169 interchange is reconfigured to remove the two existing traffic signals on mainline TH 169, two things will happen. First, the ® existing 494 slip ramp will likely be removed; and second, the amount of traffic using West 78th Street as an alternate to 169 or 494 will likely decline. While the timing for ® the interchange project remains unknown, it is still expected to occur when funding is identified. Constructing a traffic signal as a temporary solution is not cost - efficient. Shifting the site driveway was also considered. As noted earlier, the driveway cannot ® be shifted west of the slip ramp intersection, due to the existence of wetlands. Shifting the driveway further east within the property boundaries is a possibility. The traffic modeling completed for this alternative did not show an appreciable difference from the proposed location, however. A disadvantage to shifting the driveway further east is that it decreases the distance to the Braemar Office Park west driveway, limiting driver response time to a maneuver occurring there, potentially impacting safety. The mitigation measure that is recommended, again both to address existing recurring queuing and help improve operations after the addition of the site driveway access, is restriping of West 78th Street from the slip ramp intersection to West Bush Lake Road to provide two westbound lanes and one eastbound lane. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 11 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office 1 1 After this restriping is accomplished, West 78`h Street will have two continuous westbound lanes from West Bush Lake road to the slip lane intersection, eliminating blocking of westbound through vehicles. The inside lane would end as a left turn j only lane at the slip ramp intersection. Drivers should be warned of this "trap lane' configuration through the installation of appropriate signage. 1 Results of the operational analysis with the restriped West 78ch Street show substantial reduction in delay for westbound through vehicles, as expected. 95ch percentile queue length on the westbound approach are reduced, due to the queue being comprised solely of left turning vehicles. Lastly, traffic exiting the site improves to LOS C. Table 6 summarizes the results. Build PM results are repeated for comparison purposes. Table 6 With Recommended Mitigation Scenario Intersection Movement Level of 95ch Percentile Queues Service West 78'h EB A 312 WBL E 100+ Street & 494 WBT A 160+ Slip Ramp Intersection C - Build PM EB L/T A 97 West 78`h WB T/R F 1,675 Street and SB I!R F 265 Site Access Intersection F - West 78`h EB A 74 WBL E 100+ Build PM Street & 494 WBT A 61 with Slip Ramp Intersection B - Restriped EB L/T A 59 To WBL F 943 West 78'h West 78`h WB T/R B 0 Street Street and SB L/R . C 71 Site Access Intersection E - Operational Analysis Conclusions • Long westbound queues on West 78th Street approaching the 494 slip ramp intersection were observed in the field on both rainy and dry days. Queues over 20 cars in length were noted in both cases, with queuing on the rainy day being substantially worse. • Analysis of existing conditions revealed the need for unique calibration of the SimTraffic model. Using the default value of 15 mph for turning speed on the westbound left turn movement to the 494 slip ramp resulted in longer than observed queuing on West 78th Street. A value of 15 rmph is more representative of rainy or snowy conditions. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 12 Hellmuth 6 Johnson Law Office k3-7 �1 j N i o Analysis of AM peak hour conditions revealed no operational issues, both for existing conditions and for Build conditions after the addition of the proposed site driveway and related traffic. ® m The calibrated model of Existing PM peak hour conditions mirrors the existence of poor LOS and long queues on the westbound approach. The queuing is made worse by the inability of westbound through vehicles to bypass the queue. I 0 Results for Build PM peak hour conditions show degraded operations, as expected, with the addition of the site driveway and site - generated traffic. The location of the site driveway adversely impacts the efficiency of the westbound left turn movement onto the 494 slip ramp. The basic location of the driveway is fixed, however, due to constraints posed by wetlands and adjacent development. Fine tuning of the driveway location does not appreciably impact operational analysis results. Multiple strategies were investigated to address the existing queuing problem and to help mitigate the impact of the addition of the site driveway and traffic. The best potential solution appears to be restriping of West 78`h Street from West Bush Lake Road to the 494 slip ramp intersection to provide two westbound lanes and one eastbound lane, preventing blocking of westbound through vehicles by the westbound left turn movement queue. • Modeling results of the recommended mitigation strategy show substantial gains in efficiency, including reduced delay for westbound through vehicles and a reduction in westbound queue length. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 13 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office k34 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings discussed above, the following recommendations are presented: a Locate the site access.d ive;a-s- proposed; approximately half way between the 494 slip ramp intersection=aid the. existing Braemar Office Park west driveway. The driveway should be constructed to standard dimensions, provided one lane each for eritering and exiting trafFic. The existing large tree to the west should be removed to provide adequate sight distance. ® Restripe West 78`h Street from West Bush Lake Road to the 494 slip ramp intersection to provide two westbound lanes and one eastbound lane. The recommended lane widths for this. 36-foot wide roadway are two 11 -foot westbound lanes and one 14 -foot eastbound lane. O Adjust the roadway signage on West 78th Street to reflect the new striping plan. In particular, remove the westbound "lane ends" sign, and add a "left lane must turn left" sign approximately 1000 feet in advance of the 494 slip ramp intersection. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 14 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office 143 A. Traffic Count Data A -1 2009 Turning Movement Volume Count Detail B. Operational Analysis Results B -1 2009 Existing B -2 2011 Build 1 APPENDIX 1 I I Traffic Impact Analysis Page 15 Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office k I r Westwood Professional Services Edina, MN Turning Moment Count Weekday AM PM AM Peak Hour 164 1 173 134 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM PM Peak Hour 925 3 457 127 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Entered By: NJE Page 1 of 1 .P:\ 20091058 \docs \Traffic \Counts \2006 -06 -24 Count 4411 Hellmuth Johnson 20091058 Wednesday June EB— WB L T I R L I T I R 24, 2009 NB - - -- SB L T R L T R 15 min._ Total 7:00 AM 29 0 24 15 68 7:15 AM 43 0 28 31 102 7:30 AM 35 0 37 35 107 7:45 AM 39 0 61 38 138 8:00 AM 44 1 30 39 114 8:15 AM 46 0 45 22 113 8:30 AM 29 1 36 221 88 8:45 AMI 35 0 38 30 103 4:00 PM 205 2 115 22 344 4:15 PM 200 0 87 15 302 4:30 PM 2601 0 1041 36 400 4:45 PM 220 0 112 27 359 5:00 PMI 226 3 128 36 393 5:15 PM 219 0 113 -28 360 5:30 PM 178 1 88 25 292 5:45 PM 102 0 69 21 192 Total 1 19101 81 11151 4421 1 3475 AM Peak Hour 164 1 173 134 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM PM Peak Hour 925 3 457 127 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Entered By: NJE Page 1 of 1 .P:\ 20091058 \docs \Traffic \Counts \2006 -06 -24 Count 4411 Hellmuth Johnson 20091058 ® Operational Analysis Results Hellmuth + Johnson Law Office Node intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall 2000 Existing AM 1 W 78th St & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes T 1 I F T T Volume Volume 164 925 173 134 127 SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic Delay 0.6 4.2 4.8 1.1 0.5 2.2 15.3 SimTraffic LOS SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A C Storage Storage 100 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 13 1 151 1 43 456 981 1 2009 Existing PM 1 W 78th 5t & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes T I F I T T Volume Volume 925 925 457 127 127 SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic Delay 4.2 4.2 44.7 10.1 0.5 16.4 15.3 SimTraffic LOS SimTraffic LOS A A F B A C Storage Storage 100 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 13 1 151 263 456 981 1 2009 Existing PM 15 mph Left Turn Speed 1 W 78th St & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes T T F T T Volume Volume 925 925 457 127 127 SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic Delay 4.1 4.2 122.2 76.8 0.5 44.0 15.3 SimTraffic LOS SimTraffic LOS A A F - A C Storage Storage 100 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1 41 1 151 1771 1344 981 1 2009 Existing PM with 2 Westbound Lanes 1 W 78th 5t & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes T T T F E- T Volume Volume 925 925 457 457 127 SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic Delay 263.1 4.2 93.2 43.7 0.5 191.8 15.3 SimTraffic LOS SimTraffic LOS F A F - A C Storage Storage 100 SimTraffic 95th Queue SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1 151 1 2351 1 3951 981 1 2009 Existing PM with All -Way Stop & 2 Eastbound Lanes 1 W 78th St & WB 494 Slip Ramp (All -way stop) Lanes T T F T Volume 925 457 127 SimTraffic Delay 263.1 93.2 38.1 191.8 SimTraffic LOS F F Storage 100 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1 20721 1 2351 554 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 3 6/26/09 R� Operational Analysis Results Hellmuth +Johnson Law Office Node lintersection I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 10 verall 09 Build AM 1 W 78th St & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes T T F F T Volume Volume 935 199 489 176 136 SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic Delay 5.4 0.5 35.2 3.7 0.5 14.7 1.6 SimTraffic LOS SimTraffic LOS A A A A B A Storage Storage 100 100 SimTraffic 95th Queue SimTraffic 95th Queue I 1 1 56 61 2 2 W 78th St & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes <T T T F> F> 0 Volume Volume 35 164 925 584 307 24 7 32 31 49 1 5 49 SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic Delay 3.6 0.6 1.0 158.7 1.8 0.7 12.4 193.1 10.7 192.2 5.6 1.6 SlmTraffic LOS SimTraffic LOS A A A F A A, B B = A A Storage Storage Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 49 1 1 1675 1 3 1 1 1 27 71 2009 Build PM 1 W 78th St & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes T t F T T Volume Volume 935 935 489 143 143 SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic Delay 5.4 2.7 35.2 9.3 0.6 14.7 13.7 SimTraffic LOS SimTraffic LOS A A A A B B Storage Storage 100 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1 3121 1 741 1031 207 61 2 W 78th St & Site Access (Unsignalized) W 78th St & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes <T <'t T TT> F> f-> 0 Volume 10 925 10 925 584 7 584 7 32 49 49 SimTraffic Delay 18.2 1.7 5.6 1.0 158.7 145.9 111.5 12.4 193.1 192.2 67.6 10.1 SlmTraffic LOS C A A A F F B = F B Storage Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 97 1 1 59 1 1675 1 1 1 265 1 71 2009 Build PM-with 2 Westbound Lanes 1 W 78th St & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes t E- T Volume 935 489 143 SimTraffic Delay 2.7 39.3 0.6 13.7 SimTraffic LOS A A B Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1 741 1701 61 2 W 78th St & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes <'t TT> f-> 0 Volume 10 925 584 7 32 49 SimTraffic Delay 5.6 1.0 111.5 12.4 24.0 10.1 41.3 SimTraffic LOS A A B C B Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 59 1 1 1 943 1 1 1 71 Westwood Professional Services Page 2 of 3 &4� 6/26/09 i W 'o Fl rtl �i Operational Analysis Results Hellmuth +Johnson Law Office Node lintersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 10verall 2009 Build PM with 2 Westbound Lanes, Driveway shifted East 1 W 78th St & WB 494 Slip Ramp (Unsignalized) Lanes Lanes T T F E- I T <T Volume 10 925 Volume 456 935 7 489 143 32 33 16 SimTraffic Delay 2.5 2.4 SimTraffic Delay 76.6 3.0 0.9 61.8 1.0 F 5475.4 3927.0 100.7 SimTraffic LOS 20.0 A SimTraffic LOS F A A ` A F ` Storage C Storage 5imTraffic 95th Queue 1 12 15 1 6861 SimTraffic 95th Queue i 98 233 145 I 2 W 78th St & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes <T TT> F> 0 Volume 10 925 584 7 32 49 SimTraffic Delay 5.7 1.5 234.41 40.6 42.6 17.9 84.5 SimTraffic LOS A A C F Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 75 1514 100 2009 Build PM with 2 Westbound Lanes, Driveway shifted West to Align with Slip Ramp Intersection 1 W 78th St & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes F T F T> <T Volume 10 925 456 127 7 32 33 16 SimTraffic Delay 2.5 2.4 76.6 2.0 0.9 4960.3 5475.4 3927.0 100.7 SimTraffic LOS A A F A A F ` Storage 100 5imTraffic 95th Queue 1 12 15 1 6861 478 276 1 183 Q Westwood Professional Services 16 Is Page 3 of 3 6/26/09 '`GRAVING, DRAINA".1 A10 ERCSil.'. CDN7rC4. PLAN CI '), .. - ------------ ........ ... ..V4, _7 —77: Mh--1 �—-Y II i POPE A S S 0 C I A T f A-.-.,,c 111117 --W: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES Abbott Northwestern Southwest Ambulatory Center Edina. MN qKBM GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTR( PLAN Cl j I ® 54H ELEVATION ,r2-\ EAST ELEVATION wra-W 1W 1,461-r-a ,/-2-\ WEST ELEVATION, ,%,M vifr-r-a p C)PIE. 11 1 1 . I I A I E A—mv I.,E.m Dm c. FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES Abbott Norlhwestem Southwest Ambulatory Center Edna. MN SGENOR ELEVATKM CITY SUBMrrTAL 6.12.02 DK I- cob, 41 ---------- - ----- ....................... ..... ........... --------------- - . .... . ........ .............. --- -- ---- ------------- ----- ---- .... . ............ ....... . ..... ................... . .. ..... . ...... --------- - ---------- --------- \ �� -_ -- - ---------- ------- EI ------------------ PROPOSED 5 LEVEL ti PROPOSED PROPOSED ST OSED 8 M N-1 T) SITE PLAN MASTER PLAN - DATA I 0-1 .......... . ... ------------ --------- ----------- - PH&% I ---------- ---- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- --- --------- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 26, 2002 P -02 -2 Final Development Plan Frauenshuh Companies Northeastern quadrant of 1494/169 Mr. Larsen reminded the Commission the property was rezoned in 2000 to Planned Office District, POD -2 to allow the construction of a seven -story office building with a floor area of 168,258 square feet. To support the office building a seven -story parking structure was also approved. Construction of the approved plan was not undertaken and at present the site is vacant. Mr. Larsen said at this time Frauenshuh is proposing a revised development plan for review. The revised plan calls for an eight -story building supported by a five level parking structure and a two -story building supported by a surface parking lot containing 185 spaces. Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained the plan illustrates the ability to add an additional 42 spaces east of the proposed two -story building. Mr. Larsen noted the proponents plan to develop the site in phases with Phase One containing the two -story office building and surface parking area. Mr. Larsen pointed out Phase One provides 185 spaces plus 45 spaces are suggested for a Proof of Parking Agreement. Mr. Larsen said Phase One requires either a 76 or 34 space parking variance. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposal is very similar to the plan approved in 2000. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Final Development Plan subject to: 1. Proof of Parking Agreement 2. Excel Energy approval of Phase One parking plan 3. Watershed District Permits 4. MNDOT permits, if required The proponent, Mr. Dave Frauenshuh was present to respond to questions. Also present were Gene Holderness and Steve Dodie. Mr. Holderness addressed the Commission and explained Allina is proposing to construct a facility at this location similar to the facilities they have in Lake Elmo and Sartell. Mr. Holderness explained the proposed facility would be different than Allina's Centennial Lakes facility. Mr. Holderness said the proposed facility brings to the suburbs the option of "quick day" surgeries. Mr. Holderness explained the medical business is changing. He pointed out many medical surgical procedures are "same day" surgeries, or stays under 23 hours. AV r_ He explained it is the opinion of Allina that parking demands will be lower because of the flexibility of surgery hours and "stay" time. Mr. Holdemess added this type of facility would not have the "peak hour' problems found in straight office use because patients, doctors, and staff come throughout the day. The facility is also staffed 24 hours a day, which "spreads" out trips over a longer period of time. Concluding Mr. Holderness acknowledged the proposed. suburban surgery clinic is a new creature and the parking demand is not yet known, but he believes what is proposed will satisfy the demands of employees and patients. Chairman Johnson asked how this building relates to the medical building on 55/494. Mr. Frauenshuh responded the Allina building at 494/55 is a traditional medical office building. The one proposed is quite different. Mr. Frauenshuh said the trend in medicine today is to bring the services to the people. He pointed out many suburbs are underserved and people living in the suburbs have had to go to traditional hospitals for same day surgery procedures. This facility offers "common" surgeries to be performed with limited stay without the patient being admitted to a major hospital. Mr. Frauenshuh said in his opinion what makes cities and communities great are their schools and medical facilities, and in his opinion Edina has excellent schools and now offers the next step in the future of medicine. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if this building is higher than the building that received previous approval. Mr. Larsen said the building that received previous approval was 7 stories and this proposal is for an 8 -story building. Mr. Larsen said in actuality this building is shorter. Commissioner McClelland said she has a difficult time when it appears developers want to build on every square inch of land in the City. Mr. Larsen said the proposed building may be an 8 -story building but it is lower. Mr. Larsen said in his opinion the proposed building is an improvement. Commissioner McClelland commented there isn't anything this tall around. She asked Mr. Larsen why the building is shorter if it is a story larger. Mr. Larsen explained the building design is different with lower ceilings. Commissioner McClelland asked the proponents if they have a time frame between construction of Phase One and Two. Mr. Frauenshuh responded at this time there is no definite time frame. He added it depends on the success of Phase One. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Frauenshuh if he knows the number of parking spaces each of the facilities Lake Elmo and Sartell have. Mr. Frauenshuh responded he is not sure of the exact number of parking spaces 45-1 each facility has. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Frauenshuh if he knows the number of patients seen each day at the Lake Elmo and Sartell facilities. Mr. Frauenshuh answered he is not sure on the number of patients seen each day. Commissioner Lonsbury said it would be easier to study this proposal and make an educated decision if the Commission had those numbers. Commissioner Lonsbury asked where the proponents believe the majority of patients will come from (what area ?). Mr. Frauenshuh responded to a degree that could depend on the physicians. Continuing, Mr. Frauenshuh said it is believed the serving area for the proposed facility is Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Richfield, and Minnetonka. Mr. Frauenshuh said he couldn't say for certain that patients may not come from farther away. Commissioner Swenson commented she has a concern that parking demands will not be met especially during construction of Phase Two. Mr. Dodie responded that during the construction of Phase Two it is possible a shuttle service will be used for employees to minimize impact. He stated parking would not be compromised during Phase Two construction. He explained major expansions now occur while buildings are still occupied with different parking scenario's put in place. He reiterated adequate parking would be provided during all construction phases. Mr. Frauenshuh pointed out parking will still be available (especially for employees) on Lot 2. Chairman Johnson noted the street system is not completed and asked if the roadway system will be operational before occupancy. Mr. Larsen said the roadway system should be completed in the next few weeks. Commissioner Runyan asked if any commercial space is available in the proposed building. Mr. Dodie responded it is possible an eyeglass store will be available. He added at this time he is not sure if other commercial services will be provided. Commissioner Runyan questioned if the proposed ramp in Phase Two will be able to accommodate more levels than what is depicted. Mr. Dodie said the structure would support 6 levels. 5 are depicted. Commissioner Runyan asked the number of vehicles per ramp level. Mr. Dodie responded the proposed ramp holds 154 vehicles per level. Commission Lonsbury commented it would be interesting to know the trip generation difference between a traditional medial office vs. the concept proposed. ksl r Mr. Larsen responded as mentioned previously this is a new medical concept and staff doesn't really know exactly what the trip generations would be. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen if he knows which generates more trips, a medical office facility or a non - medical office facility. Mr. Larsen responded in his experience medical use generates 5 -10% more trips. Mr. Larsen pointed out medical trip generations are distributed throughout the day with traditional office buildings having more peak time trips. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen if he believes the proposed use is a better land use for this site. Mr. Larsen responded in his opinion the proposed use better suits the site, and reiterated medical facilities spread trip generations over a longer period of time. Commissioner McClelland pointed out if you travel anywhere near 494/169 during peak times you would have a problem. She pointed out doctors and nurses, etc. will also contribute to peak hour traffic congestion. Mr. Larsen responded he is not saying this use solves all traffic congestion problems during peak times; however doctors and nurses traditionally don't work 9 -5. He pointed out many doctors operate with flexibility. Commissioner McClelland asked if any signalization is planned in this area. Mr. Larsen said at this time that is being looked at. He added a real effort is being made to move traffic to West 78"' Street. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Frauenshuh if he believes this building(s) would operate like a hospital. Mr. Frauenshuh said his understanding is that this will be a jointly owned surgery center combined with other medical office uses. It may operate similar, but will also be different. Commissioner Brown said he is very familiar with this type of operation and believes this use (Phase One) will be less dense than a general office use, and will generate fewer trips. Commissipner Brown said he has no problem with Phase One as proposed. He added his larger concern might be with Phase Two. Mr. Holderness told the Commission in his experience, and acknowledging this proposal is relatively new, that more and more medical procedures will be done in surgery centers like the one proposed. Surgery centers provide lower costs to the consumer vs. the cost of a hospital stay. Commissioner Swenson asked the proponents if any thought has been given to an accessory use like an eating establishment. She pointed out employees, patients and their family members need a place to eat, especially during an extended stay. k53 c Y Mr. Larsen said the City encourages office buildings to. provide a cafeteria for their employees and- visitors.' Mr. Dodie said the layout of the facility provides some flexible space; which may`be'used for a cafeteria or restaurant type facility. Mr. Dodie said there will of course be an'employee eating area_and he believes there,will be some type of vending machines available for employees and visitors, etc. Commissioner Swenson pointed, out Kin caids is located in an office building and that "co" use appears to work well there. Mr. Dodie said the development team will look into the concept of a cafeteria or restaurant. Commissioner Swenson said in her opinion the concept is good, ,but she is uncomfortable with the parking. She said she believes the ramp should be constructed with Phase One. She said that would eliminate parking problems during the construction of Phase Two. Commissioner Lonsbury asked the proponents if there is a time frame when construction should begin. Mr. Frauenshuh said the development of this site has been on hold, and he would like to being construction as soon as possible. He explained part of the delay has been waiting for the road to be finished. Continuing, Mr. Frauenshuh told Commissioner Swenson he understands her concern with regard to adequate parking and told her the problem with constructing the ramp along with the Phase One clinic is the rent for the space in the clinic would be pushed to the max. Mr. Frauenshuh stressed he believes parking needs will be adequately met during the construction of Phase Two and the parking provided in Phase One in his opinion is adequate. Commissioner Runyan moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Lonsbury interjected and stated it is important to him to make decisions looking into the future and looking at the entire picture. He added he feels uncomfortable :making a decision on this proposal when he does not have all the facts. He said the Commission is being asked to approve a parking variance and variances are not in the City's best interest. Commissioner Lonsbury stated at this time he cannot support the proposal as presented. He said he does not have enough information i.e. the number of trips generated at the two similar facilities, and, the number of parking spaces at the two similar facilities, to make an educated decision. Mr. Frauenshuh said he also has a concern with parking, adding he would not propose to construct a building where parking demands could. not be met. Asi 1.; S l Commissioner Runyan commented projects wouldn't work if parking is a problem and he believes the proponents are aware parking demands need to be met and the proposed Proof of Parking Agreement is a good contion of approval. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Ayes; McClelland, Runyan, Workinger, Bergman, Brown, Johnson, Nays; Lonsbury, Swenson. Motion carried. kST- 14 EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 2612000 STAFF REPORT r Z- 00:1,. Frauenshuh_ Companies & 7101 West 78t''..Street S -00 -1 Request: Rezoning from POD -1 to POD -2 and 2 lot subdivision Gen'L'ocation: Northeastern quadrant of Highways 169 and.494 The subject property measures approximately 13 acres, is zoned Planned Office District, POD -1, and is vacant., The northerly 75 feet of the site is subject to an NSP easement for an overhead transmission line. The central portion of the site contains a pond covered by an easement in favor of the state highway department. A large portion of the site is impacted by wetlands and flood plain. The subject property is owned by the City of Edina. It was acquired from the FDIC in 1991. The City. has entered into a purchase agreement with the Frauenshuh Company to acquire and develop the popery. The site. became part of the" City in 1981 as part of a land exchange with the City of Bloomington that also include portions of the Raddison South Hotel. The action to zone the property for office use occurred while the property was still a part of Bloomington. The proposal would subdivide the property into.2 lots, rezoning the larger lot (Lot 1) to POD -2, and leaving the Lot 2 zoned POD -1 The only difference between the two office zones is that POD -1 limits building height to 4 stories while the POD-2. district does not have a height limit. The developers intend to immediately develop Lot 1, and hold Lot 2 for future development. The building proposed for Lot 1 would be 7 stories in height and contain a gross floor area of 168,258 square feet. The building would be supported by a 7 level parking structure containing 681 spaces. Total on site parking is proposed at 703 spaces. Code requires 673 spaces for a building this size. fq The proposed plans request two variances, both are front street setback variances. In the office district if the building or structure height exceeds 35 feet, the setback must equal the height of the building or structure. In this instance the building is 122 feet m8 inches 75 feet from height. Thus, setback setback of variances penthouse. The ramp of 87 feet 8 inches for the building and 40 feet for the ramp are required. The proposed development will be served by an extension of the West 78' Street/ frontage road which now ends at the east side of the site. The new r oad will extend west and then north to the Valley View / 169 interchange. Exterior materials of the proposed building would be predominately glass. The ramp would. be finished with precast concrete panels with glass on elevator towers. The materials comply with ordinance standards. In addition to the rezoning a subdivision of the pro pty into 2 lots of this lot requested. Lot 2 is not proposed for development at this tim Development would be subject to Final Development Plan review. The subdivision will facilitate separate ownership of the site. The subdivision complies with ordinance requirements. RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the rezoning to allow a taller building on the westerly portion of this site. Although the site is large, the buildable area is relatively small. - In order to realize a reasonable development intensity, a taller building and structured parking are necessary. Wetlands, flood plain, and the NSP easement combine to create a significant hardship and justify granting of variances for building and parking. structure height. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning and subdivision subject to: 1. Permits from Nine Mile Watershed District 2. Permits from MNDOT A"1 w , 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/ February 15, 2000 hospital tr ffic comes from the west and will be directed to Valley View Road. He added that about 36% the traffic comes from the east an d to it was hop move traffic offFran th m onto 66th Drew using Jig is and intersection improvem Member Hovland s`t ted he continued to be troubled by the sta ' 'cs shown in the traffic analysis. Mayor Maetzold said he co d not be at the March W 00 Council meeting and since it seemed more discussion of this ' sue was needed; he ted the item be carried over until April 4, 2000. Consensus of the Co cil was to c 1ze item over to April 4, 2000. Linda Schmidt, 6483 Barrie Road, said he requently travels on freeway. View and she is concerned that increased traffic will cause fic back-up onto th e y Member Johnson moved to continue/the public h ring until April 4, 2000, and to grant the City a sixty day extension from a on until, May 11, 000. Member Kelly stated he w s opposed to granting a 6 ay extension from action. He continued adding he cou support a hospital expansion, ho ever, . his estimation, the situation proposal makes a bad worse. He suspects the site will overbuilt. Member Kelly said he found nord g aesthetically appealing poor andhheHs a of va 62/France e equested very intersection. The la caping proposed was, p ith answers to the ambitious. He challenged the architects to redo their design and co me u p concerns exprp4sed by'Council and citizens and land econded the motionthem to not only ss the hospital's desires, but also the communities'. Member Ho Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, - Maetzold Nay.- Kelly Motion carried. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND 1'ItLL11V111V Hl� 1 , ,.., • .�� . __ _ _ __ COMPANIES NORTHEASTERN UADRANT don fil eAY 169 & I-494 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place Presentation by Pl_ anned Mr. Larsen explained the subject property is approximately 75 acres and zoned subject to Pan NSP Office District, POD -1. The property is vacant. Its y easement for an overhead transmission line. The central portion of the site contains a pond covered by an easement in favor of the state highway department and a large portion of the site is impacted by wetlands and flood plain. Mr. Larsen noted the City of Edina owns the property having FDIC in 1991. He said the City has entered into a purchase agreem ent with the Frauenshuh Company to acquire and develop the property. The site became part of the City of Edina as a result of a land exchange with the City of Bloomington that included portions of the Raddison South Page 12 Minutes/Edina CiMCounciVFebruary 15, 2000 Hotel. The action to zone the property for office use occurred while the property was still a part of the City of Bloomington. The current proposal would subdivide the property into two lots, rezoning the large lot (Lot 1) to POD -2 leaving Lot 2 zoned POD -1. POD -1�?o ld be building hmmediately and Lot while 2 POD -2 districts do not have height limits. Lot 1 held for future development. The building proposed for Lot 1 would be seven stories in height and contain a gross floor area of 168,258 square feet. The building would be supported by a seven level parking structure containing 681 spaces. Total on -site parking is proposed at 703 spaces, while Edina Code requires 673 spaces for a building this size. Mr. Larsen noted that two variances are requested with t18 inches high measured front street to setback distances. The proposed building is the top of the penthouse. The ramp measures 75 feet in hiight. Setback variances of 87 feet 8 inches for the building and 40 feet for the ramp are required. The p P rontage road ro osed building will be served by an extension of the West 7811, nd { fn north to the that now ends at the east side of the site. The new road will extend west Valley View/ 169 interchange. Mr. Larsen reported that the Planning Commission recommends Preliminary Rezoning W Preliminary Plat approval subject to: Final Plan Approval, Watershed District Permit anu Permits from MnDOT. No public comment was heard. Member Johnson'made a motion, seconded by Member Kelly to close the public hearing. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and 0 21 moved its adoption as follows:: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO BRAEMAR SECOND ADDITOIN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "BRAEMAR SECOND ADDITION", platted by Frauenshuh Companies, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 15, 2000, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval with three conditions: Final Plat approval, Watershed District Permit and Permits from MnDOT. Passed this 1511, day of February, 2000. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Resolution No. 2000 -21 adopted. Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/ February .15, 2000 Member Kelly moved granting first reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A -17 rezoning the property from POD -1 to POD -2. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold First Reading granted to Ordinance No. 850 -A -17. B Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved file. JDITIONAL USE ordered placed on Presentation nv 1'ld, � �G1 Mr. Larsen informed the \uncilha t Our Lady of Grace rece' ed a conditional use permit in February 1999, allowing aon of their school. That- onstruction has been completed and occupied. The church applied for a new per t to allow two smaller additions to the older portion of thhe additions woul provide a new library, a computer lab, support rooms and an ccessibilitadd P on would oc upy alportion of accomplished vements when the additions are co library courtyard of the older schg the elev for would be located on the north side of the same building. Mr. Larsen added tha ordinance standards and the added rooms that the Planning Commission recommer Permit for Our Lady of Grace's building ex� posed additions comply with all zoning require additional parking. He reported oval of the requested Conditional Use Public Comment f Doug Erickson, 5020 Richmond Dri�n( , stated he was obably the closest neighbor to the church. He asked why there had bee neighborhood m ling and where the proposed site access would be for construction. a contractor, Conunissio�n p eetingland this because a small there had been no comments made a the Planning addition, no meeting had been heduled. Mr. Smithe 11 s ho co Mr. Erickson kson expressed be accessed via the back all between the garag concern that no more trees a lost to construction. Mr. Smith assu d Mr. Erickson that no trees should be lost during a additions. Member Hovland mad motion, seconded by Member Faust to closet public hearing. Ayes: Faust,-HovlanA Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. j Member Hovlan�introduced the following ON N0ion and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOL ED by the Edina City Councibehandthe is Conditional hereby granted. Permit ber Our Lady of Gr a Church, 5071 Eden Avenue seconded th emotion. Rollcall. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold h�D Page 14 5 ru; ;y , •: i *04 SI Y'i r•. 4]n;S .... ....... ' }..!Ml: >i. '• C.-m -:S:SI X -m 3 J w6l;4. i:(3E..i,S fF:1: r< . .................. .... ... 10 PROPOSED y`'" :f } 1; - PARKING `.. , RAMP v: !ry •- >v v :.....L'. Op0 „' '. 0 :';: Sf' �' ,` Y PROPOSED C: ti OFFICE TOWER .•q: `':`• � "l' >':- :,'lo-; :iii; >i' > -::. 'r.?f � {• ` Roy .• ur `•�R�. w A ti 7• �Q r \ a)-0 \ '• 4 SATE 1 40M WORE CSMV TNO OS 0EM(XJ9w10 BUM-036 C" (Si' 1) r•Jfp(. \ •,•_O E� \Or/1EION Or LMIPG IOLOW Ll Ty I,Ia (BSS SDNIDE WrA>r: . OIMir KS BOI N01 PSNAEE UICS.) r IvfD ENE lOfA'w...> r Yxpf(1O.OUMD OR/0E5 ARE SMOww N AN APM33MTE WAY ( M%j NBI N[[rf w1[rENfcNnr vrNVUn. ME """ EOfaO[N or ALL urima NNSI s r ; I' ............. ...... i ....... ...... ^r: >f:•:,; IR."Msr•1 t"mil NEIm IKIIES �I1� r NNr wL� Nt Ns ' Ia, m •�•. r �mnnY w ..w fm�r u �s f N r O 0. r -rIIN Nrr,rw I ,Trios m r.wrr.or Orrr o.rrrMw.r.� ...... r m.. C] � ■ oe+r Ila r .m.+. r wrr 0, r�r.rrmr L 4 \ y�)1�1/ 1►�. r ,3 SCALE- I`- OO' ILCENO: (PROPOSED 575tEN� _ 0 e rr.� A= P11NNG GCrw.I NOTFS' 1, IIR Boa+ DN L vmr M Off OARS to MWC 10 UNOUW1 IIC SWPE Or wnt No ABolONA mNrue — w or ,_a M, .00 —1 mAa -AK am smTED u rwf m CEOROOCY wpm" PIIO r00101I1 PPO WM BEOXVW row CLAlOWY1 Pop r0 wOOPLL P.• .r•r rI. Ial r w r w •i r.m w .r�u ... o •,, r ..Nw .. N.r NN.a a. w. . o .,w.a .. w N• r.. r .m..w. rr +nr iuilr wn w 7 7. w.ew N. u NNOw I.N Or Na � N•I = YIr •I r- •r �- rYrN wwI O rr0 •-I w •O N wr www a +-� wN �a w I iCrr�s Mom W, w •.I. n.N • .NNr v+ N M Ir0 al• ' O wPw aN r wIMO RSP Archilec15, Ltd. 170 frs( Ave N Opt, UN 55101 Fm 617 119 6760 Ph fill 5H U5 ®0 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRt - 1JGG :N Ier,IUARY 9000 HWY 169 k 494 OFFICE TOWER GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN t 3 Commissioner Bonneville said supporting data would include turnover of parking; arrangement made by developer and adjacent property for reciprocal easement agreement for additional parking; and proof that there will not be lots of back -ups onto the roadway. Chair Workinger said this is may not be within the purview of the ETC. Commissioner Bonneville said he does not believe there is enough parking and, therefore, the cars will not be able to get in and out adequately. Commissioner Janovy said this may not need to come back to the ETC because the Planning Commission and Council will have the ETC's minutes to review. Chair Workinger called for a roll call vote as follow: Commissioner Bonneville: Aye Commissioner Janovy: Aye Commissioner Plante: Aye Commissioner Workinger: Nay Commissioner Schroeder: Nay Commissioner White: Absent Commissioner Abramvotiz: Absent Commissioner Usem: Absent Commissioner Sierks: Absent (non- Motion passed 3 to 2. C. 8050 W. 78th Street "Transportati_o_n Review Mr. Sullivan said this property is located athhe- northeast coiner of TH -169 and TH -494. He said the developer ash- proposing a 2,000 sq =ft. law office with 140 employees. The traffic study was reviewed =by the city's traffic consultarax;_Chuck Rickart and also MnDOT because of existing plans to redevelop TH%1 =69 -which placed constraints on the site due to the highway redevelopment. Mr. Sullivan. sa(staff's= concer-.ns. are: 1) development is close to the slip ramp which will =be=eiiininated — wh=en the highway-` is redeveloped; and 2) interaction of the neighboring— property entrance. with the new entrance. He said staff has requested that the entrance =be a rig ht-iri /fig tt- out`5ff I`y because of the slip ramp. The slip ramp will be eliminated whe Flfie highway is redeveloped -and the developer would like to open the entrance to full access�a dam: -.staff is recommending evaluating this at that time. Other mitigation measures are to move the median closer =to: the entrance to facilitate the right -in /right -out only and provide proper signage for such. Mr. Sullivan said-- �taffs.=recommendation was `7f so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt-5 friotion recommending that the transportation Study for 8050 W. 78th Street does nofadversely affect the adjacent transportation system and that all necessary improvements to 78th Street shall be approved by the City, design and construction of the improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer." Mr. Sullivan said the developer, Dean Dovolis of DJR, and traffic consultant, Nicholas J. Erpelding was available to answer questions. Commissioner Bonneville asked if the developer considered a second entrance on the west side of the property. Mr. Sullivan said the site is challenged by the wetland parameters and tI MnDOT will need 30 ft. to redevelop TH -169. Mr. Dovolis said they studied different entrance options and this is the only one that will work. Commissioner Bonneville asked if it is possible to have a two -lane roadway and Mr. Sullivan said yes. Commissioner Bonneville then asked if this could be done through cost participation. Mr. Sullivan said this may not be a reasonable request considering that the roadway is scheduled for redevelopment in the near future. Commissioner Schroeder made a motion to accept staff's recommendation as follow: "7f so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the transportation Study for 8050 W. 78th Street does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system and that all necessary improvements to 78th Street shall be approved by the City; design and construction of JhW mpr_ovements shall be the responsibility of the Developer." The motion was seconded byCommissioner Janovy. All voted aye. Motion passed. _ d. Safe Routes to School Study VI. Planning Commission Update (Comm issioner=Sch:roeder) VII. Bike Edina Task Force UpdateR(_Cornmissioner Janovy) a. Bike meeting minutes (Ju1y=0 _—) VIII. Staff Comments _ a. 2010/2011 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projecfs b. Promenade =lrraprovemeennts c. Public Woks Accomplishment Report d. Traffic'Safety Reports_:Jaly & Augus -009 Meeting adjourned. — 4 ° e MEMORANDUM ® Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY, OF EDINA DATE: August 27, 2009 TO: Cary Teague — Director of Planning FROM: Wayne .Houle SUBJECT: Hellmuth & Johnson' Law Office 8050 West 78t' Street Engineering has reviewed the above stated project and offer the following comments: Traffic r Analysis: See attached minutes of Transportation Commission for their comments. Grading and Erosion Control Plan: 1. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will also be required. 2. An Edina Curb Cut Permit (obtained in the Engineering Department) will be required for the driveway entrance. Utility Plan: 1. The filtration manhole located downstream from the trench drain will require a oil separator / skimmer. Landscape Plan: 1. The trees shown to the west of the drive appear to be on top of the watermain and sanitary sewer service — please move them. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. Thanks GAEngi need ng \General \70 - 79 Streets \8050 West 78th Street \Engineering\20090827 review of 8050 W 78th St WH.doc Page 1 of 1 „� Cary Teague From: Jim McCauley Umccauley @walshtitle.com] Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:41 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: FW: 4830 West 77th Street Conditional Use Permit To: Edina City Planning Department From: Jim McCauley, President of Walsh Title Re: Redevelopment of the property located at 4830 West 77th Street This memo is to confirm our intention, to support the proposed changes in use for the property located at 4830 west 77th Street in Edina. We would appreciate further updates from your department as the development goes forward. Thank you, Jim McCauley President Walsh Title 4820 West 77th Street Edina, MN. 55435 r (952)835 -3320 9/2/2009 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # III. A -Z From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: September 15, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Public Works Bids Update Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: This agenda includes bids for Contracts 5A thru 5AA, Contract 6, and a forklift for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro .Boulevard. The bids including Contract 1 thru 6 are 4.52% below budget. The aggregate bids to -date reflect a total of $12,944,708 or 88% of the project budget. You will note the mechanical bid (Item III. X.) is substantially over the June construction estimate. The mechanical bids include all of the plumbing, heating, and ventilation for the building, including equipment for the geothermal system. The plans and specifications were only designed for a geothermal system; a redesign would delay the project by three to four months. Staff is recommending that Council approve the mechanical and geothermal bid based on a short payback for these systems, see attached memo from Paulson & Clark Engineering — the mechanical designers for the project. Kris Leaf with the Weidt Group will also be presenting the Energy Analysis Study for the new building, see Item IV. A. Members of the design team including Greg Bretson — City of Edina, Ron Betcher — Oertel Architects, Rob Lowe — Paulson and Clark Engineering, Jim Bystrzycki and Cal Van't Land - JE Dunn will be in attendance to answer any questions the Council may have. Some of the remaining items to be quoted or bid are: d Permeable Pavers o Loading Dock Equipment o Low Voltage / data lines o Security o Monument signage and flag poles o Office Equipment o Furnishings and other miscellaneous items G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Expenditures\20090818 rr bid update for PW facility.doc Paulson & Clark Engineering, Inc. 2352 East County Road J White Bear Lake Minnesota 55110 Phone 651/407 -6056 Fax 651/407 -6476 PROJECT MEMORANDUM. Issued: September 10, 2009 Project: Edina Public Works Facility PAC Project No. 05742.00 To: Jeff Oertel Oertel Architects From: Rob Lowe Re: Energy Efficiency Options Jeff At your request we have reviewed estimated cost and payback for the geothermal heating and cooling system. The system was based on current proposed building areas received from your office. Geothermal HVAC Systems Geothermal heating and cooling systems were reviewed separately for the office area and the vehicle maintenance area. The system type reviewed was based on vertical well closed -loop geothermal with water -to -water heat pump units. Office Area: The office area would be a cooling dominant system. The estimated cooling load for the system is about 60 tons. This will require approximately 68 wells; each at about 250 -feet deep. The total estimated well field size is about 27,000 SF, or about 0.62 acres. The estimated well field cost based on site soil conditions is about $164,000. Estimated system payback based on current utility costs is about 8.1 years. Vehicle Maintenance Area: The vehicle maintenance area was reviewed as a cooled space during the summer season and therefore would be a cooling dominant system. The estimated cooling load for the system is about 45 tons. This will require approximately 56 wells, each at about 250 -feet deep. The total estimated well field size is about 22,000 - SF, or about 0.51 acres. The estimated well field cost based on site soil conditions is about $135,000. Estimated system payback based on current utility costs is about 9.5 years. If you have any questions or concerning regarding this item, please call. Otte KA :�C REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Forklift DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 1. Forklifts of Minnesota 2. Ziegler RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Forklifts of Minnesota AGENDA ITEM III. A. BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE October 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 26,895.00 $ 26,900.00 $ 26,895.00 Tax $ 1.842.31 Total $ 28.737.31 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for a used forklift to be used in the current and future Public Works Facility. This unit is a 2008 model with low hours; a new forklift would cost $34,400. This unit will replace the forklift duties of a 1996 John Deere loader - Unit #25.463, which is being sent to auction this fall. This unit will be used for general loading and unloading trucks, racking and storage of equipment and their accessories as well as other tasks in Equipment Operations. This purchase will be funded through the new Public Works Buildinq fund. The Recommended Bid is within budget not G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRPW \RFP - Misc\20090915 rfp forklift.doc Public Works — Public Works _ Department S het h W' lin, Finance Director Hughes, ity Manager Oi •,vv • REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Concrete Work Contract No.513, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 November 2, 2009 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Gresser Companies, Inc. $717,000.00 2. Kelleher Construction Corporation $735,000.00 3. Northland Concrete & Masonry, LLC $780,000.00 4. DayCo Concrete Company, Inc. $880,900.00 5. Steenberg - Watrud Construction, LLC $894,420.00 6. Maertens- Brenny Construction Company $899,200.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Gresser Companies, Inc. $717,000.00 GENERAL. INFORMATION: This project is for the internal concrete work flooring for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Gresser Companies, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $826,014. Staff recommends awarding this project to Gresser Companies, Inc. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works Department Director %rdon Hughes,VOty &anager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 56 Concrete Work \Contract No. 513 RFP.doc ,aaa TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Unit Masonry Contract No.5C, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 11 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 2. Gresser Companies, Inc. 3. Magney Construction, Inc. 4. Maertens- Brenny Construction Company 5. Weise Masonry, Inc. 6. Northland Concrete & Masonry, LLC 7. Hines & Sons, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Gresser Companies, Inc. November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $261,900.00 $323,000.00 $334,650.00 $341,320.00 $346,600.00 $378,600.00 $261,900.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the unit masonry, which includes the internal concrete block walls for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. Steenberg Watrud Construction has requested to withdraw their bid after they realized a major mistake. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Gresser Companies, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $276,740. Staff recommends awarding this project to Gresser Companies, Inc. �� Wnw�-,F, OF nature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works Department allin /Fjhance Director Gordon Hughes,`City Imager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction\Misc \Contract No. 5C Unit Masonry\Contract No. 5C RFP.doc ,ane �,C:`a+ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE �aaa TO: . Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN, EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Miscellaneous Metals (Material Only) Contract No.5D, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 1. Sierra Metals, Inc. 2. Northern Lights Steel Fabrication 3. D &M Iron Works, Inc. 4. Anderson Iron Works, Inc. 5. Thrunbeck Steel Fabrication, Inc. 6. AM -TEC Designs, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Sierra Metals, Inc. BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid _ $117,395.00 $118,357.00 $134,300.00 $159,000.00 $159,450.00 $186,007.00 $117,395.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the miscellaneous metals (material only) for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. This part of the project includes non - structural metals such as the stairways, railings for the mezzanine areas and metals for hanging the lube reels and other vehicle maintenance accessories. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Sierra Metals, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $146,364. Staff recommends awarding this project to Sierra Metals. Inc. Public Works ignature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within d all' Finance Director don Hughes, Ldi anager ttv G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Mist \Contract No. 5D Misc Metal (Matt Only) \Contract No. 5D RFP.doc o�Ie REQUEST FOR PURCHASE eaa TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Miscellaneous Metals (Labor Only) Contract No.5E. I DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 1. A.M.E. Construction Corporation 2. High Five Erectors, Inc. 3. Sierra Metals, Inc. 4. Patriot Erectors, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: A.M.E. Construction Corporation No. PW -1 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 42,600.00 $ 44,900.00 $ 48,520.00 $119,548.00 $42,600.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the labor to install the miscellaneous metals as awarded III. D. for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that A.M.E. Construction Corporation is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $84,243. Staff recommends awarding this project to A.M.E. Construction Corporation - The Recommended Bid is 0 within budget not within on Hugh Public Works Department Walj n Finance Director G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction\Misc \Contract No. 5E Misc Metals (Labor Only) \Contract No. 5E RFP.doc REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. F. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Carpentry and Miscellaneous Contract No.5F, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Greystone Construction Company 2. George F. Cook Construction Company 3. Crossroad Construction, Inc. 4. Kellington Construction, Inc. 5. Prestige Builders of MN 6. McFarland Construction Company 7. Jorgenson Construction, Inc. 8. Tekton Construction Company RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Greystone Construction Company November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $150,696.00 $161,600.00 $169,475.00 $171,000.00 $194,000.00 $209,400.00 $215,000.00 $229,900.00 $1 50,696.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for general carpentry work for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Greystone Construction Company is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $179,530. Staff recommends awarding this project to Greystone Construction ComDanv The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within b Jo Gbrdbn Hughes, G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Misc \Contract No. 5F RFP.doc Public Works Department ce Director No. 5F Carpentry & REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. G. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Millwork / Casework (Material Only) Contract No.5G, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 11 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Northern Woodwork, Inc. 2. Aaron Carlson Corporation 3. Principle Fixture & Millwork 4. Focal Point Fixtures, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Northern Woodwork, Inc. November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $34,187.00 $40,777.00 $44,067.00 $46,841.00 $34,187.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for millwork and casework, such as the trim work and cabinetry for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Northern Woodwork, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $45,853. Staff recommends awarding this project to Northern Woodwork, Inc. Signature The Recommended Bid is V4 within budget not within budcietA J Hughes, Public Works Department allinJUnance Director r G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5G Mill & Case Work (Matt Only) \Contract No. 5G RFP.doc REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. H. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Metal Wall Panels Contract No.51-1, Improvement No.'PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED JFBID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Progressive Building Systems 2. Armetex, Inc. 3. SGH, Inc. 4. Division V Sheet Metal, Inc. 5. Minnetonka Architectural Products Co. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Progressive Building Systems November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 306,249.00 $ 314,500.00 $ 379,000.00 $ 446,000.00 $ 471,000.00 $ 306,249.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is metal wall panels for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 .Metro Boulevard. This part of the project includes the insulated metal wall panels to be placed on the exterior walls of the vehicle storage area; the current concrete block wall is not insulated. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Progressive Building Systems is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $349,260. Staff recommends awarding this project to Progressive Building Systems. V 'i /�� ww4 WFIRWWA-i.� The Recommended Bid is 0 within budget not within Public Works Denartment Ilin,/FiAance Director Gordon Hughes, (°.its! ager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Constructs nUsc \Contract No. 5H Metal Wall Panels \Contract No. 5H RFP.doc F-4 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. I. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Roofing Contract No.51, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 November 2, 2009 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Bernard L. Dalsin Company $ 975,000.00 2. Stock Roofing.Company, Inc. $1,033,593.00 3. Peterson Bros. Roofing & Construction, Inc. $1,046,100.00 4. Palmer West construction Company, Inc. $1,089,900.00 5. Walker Roofing Co., Inc. $1,091,000.00 6. Lake Area Roofing & Construction, Inc. $1,102,369.00 7. Berwald Roofing Company, Inc. $1,187,259.00 8. S.G.O. Roofing & Construction, LLC $1,344,381.00 9. Dalco Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. $1,390,100.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bernard L. Dalsin Company $975,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for roofing for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. This part of the project includes the removal and replacement of the entire roof. The roof chosen for this project is a "TPO" (thermoplastic polyolefin) type roof. The roof is white in color, which means it is more sustainable than a traditional black roof due to less solar gain. The roof also comes with a 20 -year warranty. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Bernard L. Dalsin Company is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the,work was $1,018,142. Staff recommends awarding this project to Bernard L. Dalsin Company. a�/" Public Works ignature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within bu et Jo lin, F' nce Director PJ 7 Gord n Hughes, C y a ger G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 51 aea TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. J. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Joint Sealants Contract No.5J. Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Excalibur Caulking, Inc. 2. A. J. Spanjers Co., Inc. 3. Sunrise Specialty Contracting, Inc. 4. The Caulkers Company, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Excalibur Caulking, Inc. November 2,'2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $34,300.00 $60,719.00 $78,480.00 $79,650.00 $34,300.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for joint sealants for the new Public Works facility located at 745Q Metro Boulevard. This part, of the project includes all of the joint sealants / caulking for the project. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Excalibur Caulking, Inc.- is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $22,812; JE Dunn feels that re- biding the project will not generate a lower bid. Staff recommends awarding this project to Excalibur Caulkinq, Inc. Public Works Signature _ Department The Recommended Bid is 4 within budget not within 01 n W lin, F' nce Director G67rW Hughes, ger G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction\ isc \Contract No. 5J Joint Sealants \Contract No. 5J RFP.doc of ff, 11 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. K. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Doors, Frames and Hardware (Material Only) Contract DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 1. Twin City Hardware Co. 2. Wheeler Hardware 3. ' Kendell Doors and Hardware 4. Glewwe Doors, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Twin City Hardware Co. No. PW -1 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $108,000.00 $114,950.00 $118,499.00 $131,392.00 $108,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the building doors, frames, and hardware for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. This part of the project includes all of the required doors, frames, and hardware for the project. The carpentry bid will be installing the doors and hardware. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Twin City Hardware Co. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for.this portion of the work,was $104,522; JE Dunn feels that re- biding the project will not generate a lower bid. Staff recommends awarding this project to Twin City Hardware Co. Public Works Si nature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within ud e a I , Finance Director don Hughe , i anager G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Cons r tion \Misc \Contract No. 5K Doors, Frames, Hardwares (Matl Only) \Contract No. 5K RFP.doc �aae TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. L. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Overhead Doors Contract No.51-, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 11 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. API Garage Door Store 2. Twin City Garage Door Co. 3. Overhead Door Co. of the Northland 4. Crawford Door Sales RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: API Garage Door Store November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $111,570.00 $115,000.00 $118,400:00 $159,346.00 $111,570.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the overhead doors for the maintenance and vehicle storage areas for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels. that API Garage Door Store is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $107,577; JE Dunn feels that re- biding the project will not generate a lower bid. Staff recommends awarding this project to API Garage Door Store. The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works Department allikkinance Director Gordon Hughes, Cit) tanager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5L Overhead Doors \Contract No. 5L RFP.doc REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. M. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Aluminum Entrances & Framing / Glass & Glazing / Translucent Panel Skylight System Contract No.5N No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 1i BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. W. L. Hall Co. 2. Empirehouse, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: W. L. Hall Co. November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $163,119.00 $165,818.00 $163,119.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the aluminum entrances and framing, glass and glazing, and the translucent skylight systems for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that W. L. Hall Co. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $183,324. Staff recommends awarding this project to W. L. Hall Co. ff�—IM�N 9 n a t �ur e The Recommended Bid is X - within budget not within Hughes, Public Works Department allinJFihance Director G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5N Alum. Entrance &Framing, Glass &Glazing, Transl. Panel Skylight Sys \Contract No. 5N RFP.doc %I ff I MTK : ts -Z JUV; REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. N. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Gypsum Drywall Systems Contract No.50, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. RTL Construction, Inc. 2. W. Zintl, Inc. 3. Minuti -Ogle Co., Inc. 4. Mulcahy, Inc. 5. Custom Drywall, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: RTL Construction, Inc. November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $172,696.00 $179,520.00 $181,000.00 $202,480.00 $257,700.00 $172,696.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This.- project is for gypsum drywall systems and entrance soffit stucco for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that RTL Construction, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $213,337. Staff recommends awarding this proiect to RTL Construction. Inc. Public Works Sig ature — Department The Recommended Bid is x J � within budget not within dg J W lin, ance Director Hughes, G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 50 Gypsum Drywall Systems_Stucco \Contract No. 50 RFP.doc ,aaa REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City. Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM 111. 0. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Tile Contract No.513, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Dale Tile Company 2. CD Tile & Stone, Inc. 3. Grazzini Brothers & Company 4. Advance Terrazzo & Tile Co., Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Dale Tile Company November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $59,700.00 $63,600.00 $64,900.00 $69,790.00 $59,700.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the floor tile for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Dale Tile Company is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $73,333. Staff recommends awarding this project to Dale Tile Company. Public Works gignatUllie Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within b Jget A J W Ilin, ance Director Hughes, G: \Engineering\lnfrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5P Tile \Contract No. 5P RFP.doc �I 2 :JmVY REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. P. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Acoustical Ceilings Contract No.5Q. Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Prestige Builders of MN 2. Twin City Acoustics 3. Kirk Acoustics, Inc. 4. Minnesota Acoustics, Inc. 5. Architectural Sales of Minnesota, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: ' Prestige Builders of MN November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $41,000.00 $45,398.00 $51,550.00 $53,750.00 $53,905.00 $41,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: T his project is for the acoustical ceilings for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Prestige Builders of MN is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $44,396. Staff recommends awarding this project to Prestige Builders of MN , The Recommended Bid is K within budget not within Public Works Department Hughes, Qrt� MAnager ,ice Director G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 50 Acoustical Ceilings \Contract No. 5Q RFP.doc REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City- Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. O. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Carpet And Vinyl Base Contract No.5R, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 11 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Floors by Beckers 2. Architectural Sales of Minnesota, Inc. 3. Commercial Flooring Services, LLC 4. Grazzini Brothers & Company 5. MCI, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Floors by Beckers November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $26,520.00 $27,430.00 $28,180.00 $31,700.00 $33,100.00 $26,520.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the carpeting and vinyl base for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Floors by Beckers is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $30,798. Staff recommends awarding this project to Floors by Beckers. L�C/��iit!o Public Works Signature _ Department The Recommended Bid is K within budget not within budget /) i Vaiiin,yFjliance Director Hughes, G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction\Misc \Contract No. 5R Carpet and Vinyl Base\Contract No. 5R RFP.doc o ��I e �In H � � \\ lose TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor& City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III.-R. revised ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Resinous Coatings Contract No.5S. Im DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 2. Quality cleaning, Inc., dba QC. Companies 3. Pro Maintenance, Inc. 4. Ram Construction. Services of Minnesota RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Quality cleaning, Inc., dba QC Companies No. PW -1 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $- 68 490.00 $ 97,060.00 $142,813.80 $165,000.00 $97,060.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the resinous coatings (poured flooring) for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. Grazzini Brothers & Company Construction has requested to withdraw their bid after they ' realized a major mistake. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Quality cleaning, Inc is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $53,987; JE Dunn feels that re- biding the project will not generate a lower bid. Staff recommends awarding this project to Quality cleaning, Inc U'lignature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Hughes, Public Works a►Ifl,(, Finance Director G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5S Resinous Coatings \Contract No. 5S RFP.doc Sharon Allison From: Jim Bystrzycki [Jim. Bystrzycki @jedunn.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 7:09 AM To: Wayne Houle; Sharon Allison Cc: John Silva Subject: FW: Public Works Project City of Edina FYI Jim Bystrzycki, LEER® AP Senior Project Manager JE Dunn Construction 9855 W. 78th Street, Suite 270 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952 - 830 -9000 Direct: 952 - 833 -5947 Fax: 952 - 830 -1365 www.iedunn.com A Please consider your responsibility to the environment before printing this e-mail. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any documents accompanying it contain certain confidential information belonging to the sender, which is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, forwarding, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify us by telephone to arrange for the return of the original material. From: Gene Jr. Grazzini [mailto:Gene]r @grazzini.com] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:38 PM To: Jim Bystrzycki; Jim Bystrzycki; John Silva Cc: Greg Grazzini Subject: Public Works Project City of Edina Attn: Jim Bystrycki J. E. Dunn Construction Re: Public Works Project City Of Edina Dear Mr. Bystrycki, Grazzini Brothers & Company requests that the City of Edina allow us to withdraw our bid regarding Group 5S, Section #09850 Resinous Floors on the Public Works Project. We have found a major error in our quotation. We appreciate the City of Edina's consideration of this request. Sincerely, Eugene F. Grazzini Chairman of the Board Grazzini Brothers & Company 1175 Eagan Industrial Road Eagan, MN 55121 9/14/2009 �aea TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. S. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Painting Contract No.5T, Im DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 1. Wasche Commercial Finishes, Inc. 2. Dan Treb Painting & Decorating, Inc. 3. Brush Masters, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Wasche Commercial Finishes, Inc. No. PW -1 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $179,900.00 $202,480.00 $495,874.00 $179,900.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the interior painting of the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Wasche Commercial Finishes, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $175,168. Staff recommends awarding this project to Wasche Commercial Finishes. Inc. lm� The Recommended Bid is within budget K not within budget Public Works Department ager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5T Painting \Contract No. 5T RFP.doc 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. T. . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Vehicle Wash System Contract No.5V, Improvement No. PW-1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 11 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. InterClean Equipment, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: InterClean Equipment, Inc. November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $203,500.00 $203,500.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the vehicle wash system for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. This bid was designed to accept many different types of wash systems. Staff has reviewed and observed this system at other public works facilities and feels it performs satisfactory for our use; this system can also wash larger items such as school buses or fire equipment. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that InterClean Equipment, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $203,500; JE Dunn feels that re- biding the project will not generate a lower bid. Staff recommends awarding this project to InterClean Equipment, Inc. Public Works Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within bAgeA jq alli , finance Director nager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5V Vehicle Wash System \Contract No. 5V RFP.doc 0 :',< REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. U. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Vehicle Lifts Contract No.5W, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Westside Equipment Company 2. Pump & Meter Service, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Westside Equipment Company November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $234,490.00 $289,244.00 $234,490.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the vehicle lifts that are used in the vehicle maintenance area in the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Westside Equipment Company is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $225,723; JE Dunn feels that re- biding the project will not generate a lower bid. Staff recommends awarding this project to Westside The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works Department G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5W Vehicle Lifts \Contract No. 5W RFP.doc REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. V. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Overhead Cranes, Hoists & Monorail Contract No.5X, Im DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 1. Superior Crane Corporation 2. Alltech Engineering Corporation RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Superior Crane Corporation nt No. PW -1 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $177,000.00 $189,763.00 $177,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the overhead cranes, hoists and monorail systems to be used in the vehicle maintenance and the shop areas of the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Superior Crane Corporation is a. qualified bidder for this project. The. construction estimate for this portion. of the work was $152,665. JE Dunn feels that re- biding the project will not generate a lower bid, however, JE Dunn also feels there can be a $30,000 cost savings if a patented mono -rail system was replaced with a similar system; this deduction would be seen in a future change order. Staff recommends awarding this project to Superior Crane Corporation. ture The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works Department G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5X Overhead Cranes, Hoists & Monorail \Contract No. 5X RFP.doc r� REQUEST FOR PURCHASE lees TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. W. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Fire Protection Contract No.5Y, Improvement No. PWA DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. Summit Fire Protection Company 2. Goram Oein Mechanical 3. Brothers Fire Protection, Inc. 4. Simplex Grinnell 5. Total Fire Protection 6. Service Fire Protection, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Summit Fire Protection Company November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $133,800.00 $162,500.00 $163,200.00 $177,910.00 $200.000.00 $225,355.00 $133,800.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the building fire protection for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Summit Fire Protection Company is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $161,574. Staff recommends awarding this project to Summit Fire Protection Company. z /� � ia 1,4Z The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Hughes, C Public Works Department nce Director G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5Y Fire Protection \Contract No. 5Y RFP.doc wq�r� o e �V4 (D 0 • �NgDRpoM� • \� lees REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. X. II ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Mechanical, Contract No.5Z, Imp No. PW -1 11 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED September 2, 2009 Company 1. General Sheet Metal Company, LLC -2. Albers Mechanical 3. Wenzel- Plymouth Plumbing, LLC 4. Schadegg Mechanical, Inc. 5. Thelen Heating & Roofing, Inc. 6. Superior Mechanical 7. Master Mechanical, Inc. 8. Klamm Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 9. Modern Piping,.lnc. 10. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 11. Minnetonka Plumbing, Inc. 12. MD Mechanical, Inc. 13. Area Mechanical, Inc. 14. NAC Mechanical & Electrical Services RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: General Sheet Metal Company, LLC BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $3,340,200.00 $3,384,950.00 $3,394,700.00 $3,494,000.00 $3,517,300.00 $3,547,000.00 $3,551,300.00 $3,570,500.00 $3,600,000.00 $3,613,200.00 $3,667,000.00 $3,773,000.00 $3,773,800.00 $3,846,300.00 $3,340,200.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is. for mechanical systems for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. This part of the project includes all of the mechanical systems such as the plumbing, heating, and ventilation for this building. The costs also include the interior geothermal systems such as the pumps and necessary piping. JE Dunn the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that General Sheet Metal Company, LLC is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $2,610,685; the geothermal along with the in -floor heat in the vehicle maintenance area was not including the original estimate. JE Dunn feels that narrow margin of the bids reflects the best cost for this package and feels that rebidding will not reflect a lower bid. Staff recommends awarding this project to General Sheet Metal Company, LLC. The Recommended Bid is u within budget not within Public Works Director GoMUn Hughes, City MAnager G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction\Misc \Contracty No. 5Z Mechanical \Contract No. 5Z RFP.doc TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. Y. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Electrical Contract No.5AA, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 2, 2009 Company 1. C & S Electric, LLC 2. Klein Electric, Inc. 3. Bloomington Electric Company 4. Manor Electric 5. Muska Electric Company 6. Olympiatech Electric 7. Phasor Electric Company 8. Mendota Electric, Inc. 9. Premier Electrical RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: November 2, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 988,900.00 $ 1,053,000.00 $ 1,114,000.00 $ 1,128,223.00 $ 1,128, 295.00 $ 1,281,700.00 $ 1,291,000.00 $ 1,344,197.00 $ 1,364,540.00 C & S Electric, LLC $ 988,900.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the electrical systems for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that C & S Electric, LLC is a qualified bidder for this project. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $1,110,340. Staff recommends awarding this project to C & S Electric, LLC. The Recommended Bid is PC within budget not within Public Works Wolin „F�nance Director Gorddn Hughe!; City "ager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 5 General Construction \Misc \Contract No. 5AA Electrical \Contract No. 5AA RFP.doc 4gSA,l� 0 loss REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 15, 2009 AGENDA ITEM III. Z. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Public Works Building: Geothermal Wells & Piping Contract No. 6, Improvement No. PW -1 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE September 9, 2009 Company 1. Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. 2. Mineral Service Plus /GR Mechanical 3. Stevens Drilling & Environmental Services, Inc. 4. North Star Drilling November 9, 2009 Amount of Quote or Bid $299,500.00 $496,333.00 $713,560.00 $808,000.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. $299,500.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the geothermal wells for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. This part of the project includes 124 wells at 250 -feet deep and piping of the wells to the new building. As you will recall this project is a re -bid due to the bid being too high ($825,000) on August 12. The period for installation of the wells was extended through the winter months, therefore the reduction in price from August 12. JE Dunn, the City's construction Manager for this project has reviewed the bids and feels that Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. is a qualified bidder for this project. Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. has also satisfactorily performed other municipal well work for the City. The construction estimate for this portion of the work was $300,000. Staff recommends awarding this project to Bergerson - Caswell, Inc Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within b Public Works Department Ilin, F#ance Director -Gordon Hughes, &YIV14ager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Contract No. 6 Geothermal Wells & Piping \Contract No. 6 Bergerson - Caswell - Geothermall \Contract No. 6 RFP.doc A , AGENDA ITEM: III. AA DATE: may° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Steven Grausam— Liquor Director VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: General construction York loading dock COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. Outland Builders Inc. 1. $29,350.00 2. Diversified Construction 2. $33,740.00 3. Greiner Construction 3. $39,510.00 RECOMMENDED BID: Outland Builders $29,350.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: The general construction work is for new loading dock according to specs. in contract package #5 This bid came in over estimate but within total amount of budget. I recommend that we accept bid by Outland Builders Signature v V The Wcomn*nded $id is X (within budget) G on L. Hughes, Cij Manager ADMINISTRATION Department (not within budget) J14all VV 411111, 11 11la1mv, Yll a.�.w■ livca, j1? � AGENDA ITEM: I Oe DATE: 9 -15 -09 t�It REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Steven Grausam— Liquor Director VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS ur' X15,000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Steel supply and erection for York Liquor loading dock COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. Patriot Erectors. 1. $19,450.00 2. Outland Builders 2. $20,490.00 3. A.M.E. Construction Corp. 3. $23,400.00 IRECOMMENDED BID: Patriot Erectors $19,450.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase order is for the steel supply and erection for the York Liquor loading dock. All work will be performed according to contract package #4. The bid came in over estimate but within the total cost of our budget. I recommend that we accept the bid from Patriot erectors. Signature The Recommended Bid is . .11 el 4nGz�L�. Hughes, Ci nager ADMINISTRATION Department (within budget) (not within budget) Jokfi Wallin, Finance Director /1N,1� AGENDA ITEM: i I I . cc _ O e DATE: 9-15-09 _ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Steven Grausam— Liquor Director VIA: GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Masonry Work York Liquor loading dock COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. Wachholz Masonry Inc, 1. $27,632.00 2. Deming Construction 2. $31,000.00 3. Outland Builders Inc. 3. $34.990.00 RECOMMENDED BID: Wachholz Masonry $27,632.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This masonry work is for rebuilding of loading dock at the York Liquor store. All work will be performed according to the specs. of contract package #3. This bid came in over estimate by $1,000 but within total budget for project. I recommend that we accept bid with Wachholz Masonry ADMINISTRATION Signature Department The Recommpgded Bids /,"')X (within budget) (not within budget) L. Hughe , dity Manager Jo Wallin, Finance Director REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: September 15, 2009 Subject: Edina Public Works Energy Analysis — The Weidt Group Agenda Item Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action # IV. A ❑ To H RA ® To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Info /Background: Xcel Energy provides an energy design assistance service for owners and agencies that are developing new buildings. Staff enlisted their help to analyze the new Public Works facility. The program is no cost to the City; Xcel Energy funds our design team for time spent working with Xcel Energy's consultant — The Weidt Group. Kris Leaf with The Weidt Group will be presenting the analysis. The attached reports, 1 and 2 of 3, analyzes and identifies upgrades to maximize the energy performance while maximizing the payback and long -term functionality of the building. A third report will be submitted after completion of the building. The third report will finalize Xcel Energy's rebate to the City of Edina. G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Public Buildings \PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard \Design \Energy Reviews\20090915 rr energy analysis presentation for PW facility.doc Energy Design Assistance Xcel Energy® ENERGY ANALYSIS for the Edina Public Works Facility Edina, MN STRATEGY REPORT first of three reports July 29, 2009 7226.40 THE WEIDT GROUP- NIFEW _5BOO BAKER ROAD, SUITE 100 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345, TEL 952.93 B.15BB FAX 952.93B.14BO TWM.COM ` Introduction ---'------'------------------------r----------.3 Building Summary ----------`---..4 --------------..M Energy —'----.—.----.-----'�..—.—.0 ` —...-------l� , Strategy Summary .----------.---.---.. .. Integrated _____------_—/--_---------...l2 -' z ------------�.-_—'�--'-------.'—..l5 �A. ___---.--------.—._---.---------.48 Appendix B. ' - -------------.-.---.------�-----58 � Appendix Appendix ' C. and Schematics .............................................................. 64 Appendix D. Daylighting Guidelines ........................................................ ................................. ......... 7l Xcel Energy ` Energy Design Assistance July 29,00uo ` ` ^ @ THE: "vE/orr3moup � � - Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report F.1 ` Project Participants Design Team Owner........................................ ............................... ...........................City of Edina Wayne Houle Architect ............................................................... .........................Oertel Architects Eric Werner Jeff Oertel Mechanical Electrical Engineer . ............................... Paulson & Clark Engineering Robert Lowe Dan Paulson Energy Design Assistance Team ElectricUtility ....................................................... ............................... Xcel Energy Jennifer Abbott Jenny K. Wagner Energy Design Assistance Consultant .......... ............................... The Weidt Group Kris Leaf Vinay Ghatti Lauren Huynh Verification Consultant ..... ............................... ............................The Weidt Group Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.2 Introduction This report is:.a key part'of a_process designed to assist the Owner and Design Team in making energy - related decisions. about building'' design. In the introductory meeting the group identified a series,of energy conservation strategies appropriate to this building (affecting gas; electricity, district energy, or other energy sources), and this report documents the results of computer simulations for each strategy compared to a code- level base. With "hard" numbers attached.to.each strategy, potential energy savings are clear and cost - effectiveness can be easily, determined. While.the'virtual building model estimates overall energy consumption, it is primarily designed.to forecast savings, much like forecasting the savings from buying a fuel- efficient car. Energy consumption and savings forecasts are based on assumptions about,occupancy, operations, weather, and other factors. As with a car,' however, °changes in use or operation'affect the absolute value of saving's, but the relative value percentage saved, for example -- compared to the less fuel efficient option will still be valid. In the end, it is up to the Owner /operator to use and operate the building effectively in order to realize savings. The Energy Design Assistance program should not be construed as correcting or overriding previous decisions or recommendations of the Design Team. The program is analytical in nature, using tools and methods not normally part of the customary design contract. The architects and engineers of record remain responsible. for the implementation of strategies and final engineering of systems, as well as for determining costs of various strategies. The process follows a clear methodology of information gathering, collaboration, and analysis in an integrated setting of three formal meetings. The Owner, architect, engineers, cost estimators; utility representatives, and The Weidt Group work together to understand how the building will use energy and where cost effective savings can be realized, through design. These are the steps, with the current stage shown in bold. 1. Introductory meeting • Program overview • Review building design • Review strategies for modeling 2. Phase 1 analysis • Computer modeling of Code Base and strategies by The Weidt Group • Cost analysis by the Design Team 3. Strategy results meeting • Review of individual strategy results • Selection of bundles-,of strategies 4. Phase 2 analysis • Bundle energy analysis by The Weidt Group • Further cost analysis by the Design Team (if needed) 5. Bundle results meeting • Review of bundle results • Review of program incentives Introduction to Verification 6. Verification Bundle selection ■ Construction document review On -site verification of strategies Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.3 Building Summary A summary of general building details is listed below. This information is based on a review of schematic design documents and other information provided by City of Edina, Oertel Architects and Paulson & Clark Engineering. Additional building characteristics are listed in the Appendices. Building Summary ' Building type Office / vehicle storage & maintenance Location Edina, Minnesota Building area 144,776 sq ft Garage area 90,400 Number of stories 1 Building organization Perimeter offices with vehicle storage/ maintenance in the center Windows Window to floor area ratio: 2.2 %; Window to wall area ratio: 7.4% Lighting system(s) The design includes daylighting stepped controls, dual level switches, occupancy sensors, and T5s into the layout of the space. HVAC system(s) GSHP - central water to water heat pump High efficiency condensing boiler back up and rooftop units with coils at offices Areas heated All Areas cooled Office, veh maintenance, shops Electric utility Xcel Energy Gas utility Gas Util Approx. construction document completion date Approx. construction start Jul -09 Approx. occupancy date Apr -10 Other notes Additional insulation to roof and new skylights in the offices Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.4 Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report P. 5 Energy Analysis Process Computer Model This analysis utilizes DOE -2, a sophisticated building simulation program developed by Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and supported by the United States Department of Energy. Thermal and luminous calculations are made on an hour -by -hour basis, using typical yearly climatic data, to determine the building's energy loads and system requirements. Building description input involves defining the building's geometry using a Cartesian coordinate system that locates, orients and sizes all spaces, walls, windows, doors, roofs and underground surfaces. Characteristics of materials (such as material conductance, inside surface reflectance, window transmittance, and surface absorption) are identified for each building component. In addition, schedules describing the building's anticipated internal load patterns are included to account for occupancy and equipment. Electrical lighting, temperature set points, and the specific characteristics of the mechanical systems are accounted for in the model. In most cases, within the first year of operations, variations in equipment and occupancies compared to the initial modeling will become evident. These will alter the estimated savings, which may increase or decrease depending on the intensity of operations. The Weidt Group gathers building description data and assumptions from the Owner and Design Team to construct the model. Some of the customized operating assumptions include: • Building geometry • Building material properties • Mechanical system design • Lighting system design • Expected equipment load • Occupancy schedules Lighting and equipment schedules ■ Mechanical system operation The computer models are simulated using the local DOE -2 Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) weather file. Many weather parameters are significant to the model, including outdoor dry and wet bulb temperature, wind velocity, cloud cover, solar radiation and incidence angle for each hour of the year. Variations will exist between the TMY weather file and actual weather conditions in which the building will be operated. This computer model is to be used for comparison of the relative differences in net energy use for various design alternatives compared to a base condition. It is not for system design andlor equipment selection. The actual energy use of this building will be different from the DOE -2 simulations because of differences in weather, operating parameters, occupancy, and other circumstances not anticipated in the model. Given those qualifications, however, this model offers sophisticatedpredictions of energy savings with estimations as good as any other means available for a building that has not been built. Building Characteristics The computer model is very specific about what is needed to define a building for analysis, and in order for the results to be credible, a large number of building characteristics, schedules, energy costs and other assumptions must be specified. The results, thus, are fully dependent on the validity of these assumed characteristics. A summary of this data can be found in the Appendix. Code Base Computer Model A DOE -2 Code Base model is created to provide a benchmark against which to compare energy performance for each strategy or bundle of strategies. Creation of the DOE -2 Code Base model begins with the architectural and engineering design of the building as it stands at the start of the process. Based on the set of limited building characteristics provided by the Design Team and default characteristics typical to buildings Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 6 of this type, the Code Base model is created so that it just meets the current :energy code or standard..The Code Base model is used as the basis for energy performance comparisons. Isolated Strategy Analysis Several strategy categories were created for, this building., and strategies within each category bracket a range of acceptable design solutions. The list of strategies is based 'on input from The Weidt Group and feedback from the Design Team. By simulating a range' of 'solutions in each of the critical areas for energy conservation, the process is able to demonstrate the. realm of what. is possible for each energy strategy grouping. The Weidt Group simulates each strategy individually and compares results to the Code Base model to illustrate the impact of each strategy alone. It is common�for individual strategies to impact the base models by less than 10 %. However, selecting 15 strategies, each with an average value of 2% to 3 %, might result in an annual building energy cost performance on the order of 30% to 40% better than Code. It is important to understand, however, that the results are not always 100% additive. Two strategies that save 2% alone may not save 4% together; although they are likely to save 3.2% to 3.8 %. Payback Analysis Compared to Code In order to make informed decisions about an energy strategy, it is important to consider both the energy savings and the incremental construction cost required to implement the strategy. Incremental costs compared to code are estimated by the Design Team for each strategy and provided to The, Weidt Group for payback calculations. Bundle Identification Once the Isolated Strategy Analysis is complete, the Design/Owner Team will identify four bundles of strategies for simulation and further analysis. Bundles can be developed in any combination and should be customized to the needs and interests of the design team and owner. Many Energy Design Assistance participants find organization of bundles in the following order to be helpful in the decision making process. Bundle 1: Includes the strategies that will likely..be incorporated into the building for multiple" reasons, including aesthetic value, operational benefits, occupant comfort, owner preference and other non - energy specific criteria.. Bundle 2: Adds to or modifies strategies from Bundle 1, to include energy saving features that will have no significant project cost or operational barriers to implementation. Bundle 3: Adds to or modifies strategies from Bundle 2 to include additional energy saving features that could potentially be acceptable to the Owner and occupants from an operational perspective, with the understanding that additional background or training may be required to confirm acceptance., From a cost standpoint, some of these items may have longer paybacks and/or require additional funding. Bundle 4: Includes all strategies that optimize energy savings, to serve as an illustration of maximum potential given the list of strategies considered, regardless of payback. The bundle results are used by the Design Team to determine an appropriate construction and incentive solution. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009. © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 7 Base Building Results This page identifies the projected Code Base energy consumption of this building. The Code Base model assumes all energy design parameters are set to meet the prevailing code. The Code Base provides the baseline for comparison for all modeled energy conservation strategies. The charts below show a breakdown of annual energy consumption and energy cost based on the Code Base computer model. The annual energy use prediction for the code base model is 70.6 kBTU /sq ft and the energy cost is $1.43 /sq ft. Total energy cost is approximately $207,000 per year at code level. Note that these results do not include exterior lighting or elevator operation. The annual peak billing demand for the building is 472 M. Comparative Energy Streams — Code Base Model Energy Breakdown (BTU) Fnuin Lights 9% DH" 1% Fan/ Pump 34% Cool 4% Code Base Model - Detailed Energy Parameters Annual Electrical Consumption 2,796,000 kWh Peak Electrical Demand 472 kW Annual Heating Consumption 675 MMBTU Energy Cost Breakdown ($) Ec..:_ 21 Lights 9% DHV1 0% "..f Fan/ Pump 36% Cool 4% Energy Cost By End Use Heating $52,200 Cooling $7,900 Fans / Pumps $74,000 DHW $900 11-ighting $18,400 Equipment $53,700 Key Observations • The BTU Energy use is the energy delivered to the building, not including the energy for generation and transmission of electricity or gas • Heating is the dominant "energy" (BTU), but heating costs are much less proportionally than electrical costs for equipment, lights, fans /pumps, and cooling Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 8 Base Operation Assumptions The Code Base model assumes the following design parameters as well as accompanying operational assumptions, based upon transmittal information from the Owner and Design Team. Space Type Floor area % area Code lighting power (W /sf) base equipment/ plug load (W /sf) System air flow (CFM /sf) Annual lighting full load hours Annual scheduled fan hours Private office 1,000 1% 1.45 1.20 1.20 4,200 4,600 Open office 2,700 2%1 1.45 1.10 1.11 5,500 4,600 Conference 800 1% 1.30 1.05 1.30 3,800 4,600 Storage 1,400 1% 0.80 0.12 0.50 4,000 4,600 Corridor 7,000 5% 0.50 0.10 1.42 4,400 4,600 Restroom 500 0% 0.90 0.10 0.54 4,500 3,900 Vehicle storage 99,400 69% 0.20 0.50 1.50 8,700 8,760 Vehicle maintenance 17,900 12%1 0.70 2.50 1.50 5,000 4,400 Wash bay 3,800 3% 0.70 3.00 1.53 5,000 4,400 Shop 4,700 3% 1.40 1.50 1.02 3,000 3,900 Dining 2,900 2% 0.90 0.20 1.63 2,900 2,900 Locker Room & Shower 2,600 2% 0.60 0.50 0.50 2,500 4,200 Total 144,700 100% Average 0.401 0.83 1.44 7,3001 7,400 Additional mechanical design assumptions (for central fan systems, boilers, heat pumps and pumps) may be found in the Appendix of this Strategy Report. The Code Base model also assumes the following base mechanical design/ operating parameters. • Building operates in a setback mode during unoccupied hours in which thermostats in conditioned spaces are reset downward in winter and upward in summer • Outside air dampers are assumed to be closed at night, and fans can cycle on to maintain nighttime temperature settings • Central fans incorporate economizer control during temperate weather periods • Central supply fans incorporate "discharge air reset" control, which allows the discharge air set point to modulate according to the warmest zone in order to reduce cooling and reheat energy s Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 9 Strategy Summary List The following tables provide a complete list of the modeled energy conservation strategies described in this report. EWC00 Envelope Insulation Strategies Code wall assembly R -9.6 R -9.6 EWC01 R -16 wall assembly R -9.6 R -16 offices EWCO2 R -20 wall assembly R -9.6 R -20 offices EWC03 R -16 wall assembly R -9.6 R -16 storage EWC04 R -20 wall assembly R -9.6 R -20 storage ERC00 Code roof assembly R -23.3 R -23.3 ERC01 R -24 roof assembly R -23.3 R -24 ERCO2 R -30 roof assembly R -23.3 R -30 ERC03 R-40 roof assembly R -23.3 R-40 W3101. Winclow Glazing Strategies Code: 0 to 10% win /wall ratio 0.57 N/A 0.49 0.49 W0601 Lo E clear 11 alum frame 0.44 0.31 0.61 0.74 W0901 Lo E tint 1/ alum frame 0.44 0.31 0.41 0.63 W1201 Lo E clear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame 0.42 0.29 0.38 0.69 W1301 Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame 0.42 0.29 0.30 0.60 W5101 VE-85 #2 0.44 0.31 0.54 0.76 Daylighting Control Strategies D3101 Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor & lock rms. Daylight Control vehicle storage, Fluorescent Stepped locker rooms D3102 Dimming daylighting control at open office & dining open office, Fluorescent Dimming dining Strategy Lighting Control Strategies Peak Annual hrs Notes ID reduction reduction LCP01 Private office occupancy sensor control 15% 40% LCP03 Private office dual level occupancy sensor control 20% 45% LCP04 Private office dual level switching 15% 15% LCO01 Open office occupancy sensor control 0% 40% LCO04 Open office dual level switching 10% 10% LCCN1 Conference occupancy sensor control 25% 40% LCCN4 Conference dual level switching 15% 15% LCCN5 Conference manual dimming 25% 25% LCST1 Storage occupancy sensor control 25% 40% LCME1 Mech /elec occupancy sensor control 50% 70% LCCI1 Corridor occupancy sensor control 5% 20% LCRR1 Restroom occupancy sensor control 35% 55% LCGA1 Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control 25% 40% LCMH1 Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control 0% 20% LCMH4 Vehicle maintenance dual level switching 15% 15% LCWH1 Wash bay occupancy sensor control 20% 35% LCWH4 Wash bay dual level switching 15% 15% LCSH1 Shop occupancy sensor control 15% 30% LCSH4 Shop dual level switching 15% 15% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 10 Strategy Summary List (continued) Lighting Design Strategies L0200 Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.95 W /sf 1.45 0.95 3 L0300 Open office indirect system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf 1.45 1.15 2 L0400 Open office task (0.3 W /sf) ambient at 30 fc, 0.65 W /sf 1.45 0.65 2 L0500 Open office directfindirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf 1.45 0.90 2 L01 PO Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf 1.45 1.00 3 L02PO Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf 1.45 0.50 3 L03PO Private office directfindirect system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf 1.45 1.00 2 L04PO Private office directfindirect system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf 1.45 0.50 2 L05PO Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.5C 1.45 0.50 2 L02CN Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf 1.30 1.15 3 L03CN Conference indirect system at 50 fc , 1.35 W /sf 1.30 1.35 2 L04CN Conference direct/indirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf 1.30 1.10 2 L02WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 W /sf 0.70 0.60 1 L03WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 W /sf 0.70 0.30 1 L04WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 37 ft. o.c., 0.20 W /sf 0.70 0.20 1 L05WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 W /sf 0.70 0.12 1 L05MH Vehicle maintenance 2 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.53 W /sf 0.70 0.53 2 L01ST Storage; 0.68 W /sf 0.80 0.68 3 L01ME Mech /elec; 1.28 W /sf 1.50 1.28 3 L01CI Corridor; 0.43 W /sf 0.50 0.43 3 L01RR Restroom; 0.77 W /sf 0.90 0.77 3 L01GA Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf 0.20 0.17 3 L01 SH Shop; 1.19 W /sf 1.40 1.19 3 �Lighting Technology Strategies LTE01 Super T-8 lamps Std T8 Super T8 15% LTE02 Extra efficient ballasts Std ballast EE ballast 5% Cooling Efficiency Strategies MAC01 Water to water heat pump 1.26 kW/ton 0.97 or lower 60 Heat Pump Efficiency Strategies MGH01 Ground heat pump, Alternate 1 13.40/13.40 0.0 to 11.3 Fan . Pump Strategies MMT03 Premium efficiency supply /return fan motors ... EPACT Premium MMT04 Premium efficiency pump motors EPACT Premium Note: VFDs may be required by code for some building components Conditioning of Outside Air Strategies MOA02 CO2 control of outside air ... No control CO2 control MOA22 Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans Always on CO control Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.11 Integrated Utility Savings The table below shows Whole Building results for various individual strategies (gas, electricity, district energy, or other energy sources) or groups of strategies in order to show where the best opportunities are. Note that dollar savings affect payback, and savings accrue every year for the life of the building. For detailed strategy Strategy Description How does this strategy save energy? E ®. section entitled... Carbon monoxide sensor control Garage fan energy is reduced by cycling fans off $82425 $1920D $24000 Conditioning of Outside , , , of garage vent fans when carbon monoxide levels are low Air Strategies Water to water heat pump Cooling energy is reduced by an increased system $41,141 $12,480 $15,600 HVAC Efficiency efficiency Strategies Max envelope Heating and cooling load is reduced by increasing $9,399 $1,200 $1,500 Envelope Insulation insulation levels and window characteristics Strategies CO2 control of outside air Heating and cooling energy are reduced by lowering $5,771 $2,880 $3,600 Conditioning of Outside ventilation rates during times of reduced occupancy Air Strategies Lowest wattage lighting design Lighting wattage is saved by reducing light level or $4,967 $2,640 $3,300 Lighting Design Strategies increasing lighting system efficiency Occupancy sensor control of Lighting energy is saved by turning lights off when $1,657 $2,880 $3,600 Lighting Control Strategies lighting applicable spaces are empty Lo E clear 1/ alum frame Heating and cooling energy are reduced by using low $1,630 $3,120 $3,900 Window Glazing E coatings to reduce heat loss and block heat gain Strategies Premium efficiency motors Motor energy is reduced due to higher efficiencies $690 $480 $600 Fan and Pump Strategies Stepped daylighting Lighting energy is reduced by switching lights off $672 $0 $0 Daylighting Control automatically in response to daylight Strategies Lighting switch strategies Lighting wattage is saved by switches that allow $398 $240 $300 Lighting Control Strategies occupants to choose lower light levels (eg. 1/3 or 2/3) The strategies are defined in detail beginning on page 16 of the report, as well as selected Appendix sections, which may be found beginning on page 48. The chart on the facing page provides further visual comparison, of the savings potential of these key strategies. Hourly Whole Building analysis allows us to present integrated results. Individual conservation and efficiency strategies can affect more than one fuel source. For example, a more efficient lighting design will produce less heat in a building. This reduction in interior heat gain also reduces cooling energy needs. If cooling energy is produced by electricity, those savings are integrated into the Annual Dollar Savings above. However, that more efficient lighting may cause a need for more beating energy in the winter. If the beating energy came from consuming gas, the additional beating cost would also be reflected in the values above. We use the same methodology throughout this report. A positive Annual Dollar Savings means that the offsetting changes between electric consumption, gas consumption and central or district energy consumption result in a savings. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P. 12 Annual Energy Savings $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $0 Carbon monoxide sensor control of $42,425 garage vent fans Water to water heat $41,141 pump 1 Max envelope $9,399 I i CO2 control of $5,771 j outside air Lowest wattage $4 967 lighting design i r Occupancy sensor control of lighting $1,657 Lo E clear 1/ alum $1,630 frame Premium efficiency $690 motors Stepped daylighting $672 I Lighting switch $398 I strategies Potential Incentive Range $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 ■ ■ Key Observations ■ The CO control of garage ventilation fans and water -to -water heat pump strategies show the highest potential for savings. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 13 This page is intentionally left blank Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.14 Strategy Descriptions and Results Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy 'Qesign Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 THE WEIDT GROUP P.15 Envelope Insulation Strategies Strategy Objectives Minimize heat loss through cost - effective insulation choices. Strategy Descriptions The envelope insulation strategies incorporate additional insulation to the roof and walls of the building. The insulation R factors listed in the table below are overall average resistance values of the entire wall or roof assembly, accounting for: • Effects of thermal bridging of structural elements such as studs, joists, columns, etc. • Average thickness of tapered roofs • Average for multiple wall or roof assemblies Envelope Insulation Strategies •� EWC00 Code wall assembly R -9.6 R -9.6 EWC01 R -16 wall assembly R -9.6 R -16 offices EWCO2 R -20 wall assembly R -9.6 R -20 offices EWC03 R -16 wall assembly R -9.6 R -16 storage EWC04 R -20 wall assembly R -9.6 R -20 storage ERC00 Code roof assembly R -23.3 R -23.3 ERC01 R -24 roof assembly R -23.3 R -24 ERCO2 R -30 roof assembly R -23.3 R -30 ERC03 R -40 roof assembly R -23.3 R-40 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 16 Envelope Insulation Results Roof Insulation Variations Roof Annual Energy Savings Roof Potential Incentive Range SO 52.000 $4.000 $6.000 $8.000 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 R -24 roof assembly R -30 roof assembly i R-40 roof assembly I Wall Insulation Variations Wall Annual Energy Savings Wall Potential Incentive Range $0 $2.000 $4.000 $6,000 $8,000 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 R -16 wall assembly R -20 wall assembly R -16 wall assembly R -20 wall assemblv Key Points • Increased insulation values for roof and walls save energy. • In general, increasing roof and wall insulation values will not be as cost - effective as the other strategies that have been investigated. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.17 Window Glazing Strategies Strategy Objectives Manage heat gain, heat loss, and daylighting through appropriate glass and frame selection. Strategy Description Ranges in Light Transmittance vs. Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) by Glass Type A variety of glass and frame types are evaluated, compared to code -level glass assembly. The code T Clear glass for the purposes of this analysis is listed in the 0.8 Thermal table below, but it is the responsibility of the Design 0 Pane Team to determine which glass will actually meet m applicable energy codes. 0.6 Spectrally Selective Please note that spectrally selective Low E refers to Low E the Lo E Hi VT (high visible transmittance), that is c 0.4 different from other Low E products in that the visible light transmittance is higher relative to the Tinted solar heat gain coefficient. This type of glass is thus B 0.2 Reflective usually a good choice for daylighting. y C r0 0 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 J SHGC - Increased Heat Gain The strategies listed below bracket a range of glazing characteristics which are available from a number of manufacturers, along with a much larger range of variations based on extent and color of coatings and tints, number of panes and suspended films, etc. Other characteristics specific to one manufacturer or product can be simulated. Unit U- factor is the U- factor of the glass and frame assembly together. The unit U- factor of the glass and frame assembly is typically higher than the center -of -glass (C.O.G.) U- factor. The C.O.G. U- Factor is the number that is usually published by the manufacturer. Lower unit U- factors reduce heat loss, which in turn reduces heating energy. Solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) is the fraction of total incident solar radiation that is transferred through the glazing system. Visible light transmittance is a ratio of the amount of light radiation transmitted through the glass compared to the amount of light striking the exterior surface. Higher values provide more daylight. Wi ndow Glazing Strategies W3101 Code: 0 to 10% win/wall ratio 0.57 N/A 0.49 0.49 W0601 Lo E clear 1/ alum frame 0.44 0.31 0.61 0.74 W0901 Lo E tint 1/ alum frame 0.44 0.31 0.41 0.63 W1201 Lo E clear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame 0.42 0.29 0.38 0.69 W1301 Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame 0.42 0.29 0.30 0.60 W5101 VE -85 #2 0.44 0.31 0.54 0.76 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 18 Window Glazing Results The results below account for both thermal and solar losses and gains, but do not account for electrical lighting savings due to daylighting. (See Daylighting section) Annual Energy Savings Potential Incentive Range $0 $2.000 $4.000 $6.000 $8.000 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Lo E clear 1/ alum frame Lo E tint 1/ alum frame Lo E clear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame VE-85 #2 Key Points • Low -E glazings reduce energy costs • Note that these results do not include daylighting controls, and thus the effects of Visible Transmittance are not accounted for. See the Daylighting Controls section which follows for the impact of Visible Transmittance. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 19 Daylighting Control Strategies Strategy Objective Reduce electric lighting in spaces with daylight, utilizing automated or manual controls. Strategy Description Two types. of daylight controls are considered for various spaces in the building. Stepped Daylighting Control Systems turn off selected PEZI lamps /fixtures within the daylight control zone. This works best where the daylight level is above the design light level most of E'�Ig H i the day. Control device options include exterior or interior photo- sensors measuring the daylight source connected to a lighting relay able to switch lights on or off based on daylight availability or an astronomical time clock, programmed to T 1 to 1.5 x H automatically switch lights off after sunrise and on before sunset, varying daily. Dimming Daylighting Control Systems use interior photo - sensors to control electronic dimming ballasts that gradually °° dim or brighten lamps within the daylight zone. This system can H Control futures within this be transparent to the building occupant since the dimming d.ytightzone system continuously maintains the designed light levels without switching lamps on or off. 1.5 to 2.5 x Use this image when skylights are strategies Roof monitor or skylight in ceiling or roof Control all fixtures in this zone up to 2 x H + skylight ,Daylighting Control Strategies Daylight Control vehicle D3101 Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor & lock rims. storage, Fluorescent Stepped locker rooms D3102 Dimming daylighting control at open office & dining open office, Fluorescent Dimming dining Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 20 Daylighting Control Results Annual Energy Savings Potential Incentive Range $0 $2,000 $4,0010 $6,000 $8,000 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor & lock rms. Dimming d ay Ughtin offic control at open e & dining Key Points Daylight control strategies provide significant energy savings Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report © THE WEIDT GROUP P.21 More Strategy Details Interior Photosensor Viewing Out to Window Can have one sensor and relay for each orientation and by floor if desired. IMPORTANT to shield sensor from light from indirect fixtures hanging below it. Stepped Daylighting Controls Exterior Photosensor Viewing out to Sky Provides one control for all perimeter lighting control relays in building. advantage Greater control of light for space I Fewer sensors to calibrate disadvantage More controls to calibrate Less energy saving due to wider deadband setting sensor range 10 -200 FC 100 -1000 FC calibration OFF at 50 -100 FC & OFF at 600 -1000 FC and ON at 25-50 FC ON at 300 -500 FC L l0 UI L 3 0 r c I 3. Astronomical TimeClock Part of BAS or stand -alone component. Provides one control for all perimeter lighting control relays in building. Simple system to setup and operate May need overide during periods of very dark cloud cover WA Set latitude of building location OFF: 1 to 1.5 hours after sunrise ON: 1 to 1.5 hours before sunset I� Control lamps in fixtures where daylight level is normally above design light level and DO NOT control ALL lamps in each fixture. Tandem wire ballasts in each lamp to provide inboard/outboard switching for occupant control. 100 0 3 -lamp fixture with lamps denoted by ' *' are on the daylight relay and lamps denoted by ' O ' are not. Diagram above is for a typical open office space. For classroom spaces provide "aba' switching for all light fixtures in room and place the inboard lamp on the daylight control relay. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 22 More Strategy Details Dimming Daylighting Controls type Continuous Dimming Closed Loop Photosensor & Controller Controller and Photosensor can be separate or single device. For open plan office use at least one sensor per space per floor per orientation. For class room spaces use one sensor controlling all lamps in room. Electronic Dimming Ballast Use electronic dimming ballasts for all lamps in the daylight control zone. Connect control wires (typically low voltage) from photosensor controller to all dimming ballast in the control zone. advantage Continuous & gradual dimming of the light source improves the occupant comfort & reduces the potential complaints compared to the stepped daylighting control. Additional savings with lumen maintenance: Brand new lighting systems provide 20 to 35% more light than desired to account for the degradation in light output over time. A well- calibrated control system provides additional savings by dimming lamps to the desired light level, with or without daylight. disadvantage Higher first cost compared to stepped daylighting control. sensor range 5 -100 FC calibration Photosensor & Controller Max. dimming setpoint Set to begin dimming at design light level- typ. 50 FC Min. dimming setpoint: Set to dim no less than 20% of full light output Time delay: Set from 3 to 8 minutes Fade rate: Specify at least a 20 second time fade from min. to max. dimming Control output signal: Specify compatibility with ballast input signal, typically 1 -10 vdc Dimming Ballast Min. dimming range: 10 to 20% No. of ballasts on control: Check the manufacturers min & max number of ballasts per control Sensor Depth = 112 to 2/3 x D 60 3 v ED c M. Daylight Control Zone Depth = D (2 to 2.5 window head height H- control fixture lamps within this zone) / o0 level 50 fc typical L. � . �. A Continuous Dimming Photosensor typically views a 60 cone of view of the workplane luminance. For indirect fixture designs it is IMPORTANT to shield or locate sensor below fixture to prevent unwanted light from fixture directly controlling system. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT G R D U P P. 23 More Strategy Details type 1. Interior Photosensor Viewing Out to Window Can have one sensor and relay for each orientation and by floor if desired. IMPORTANT to shield sensor from light from indirect fixtures hanging below it. advantage I Greater control of light for space disadvantage More controls to calibrate sensor range; 10 -200 FC calibration! OFF at 50 -100 FC & ON at 25 -50 FC .. L d L L m U Stepped Daylighting Controls Exterior Photosensor Viewing out to Sky Provides one control for all perimeter lighting control relays in building. Fewer sensors to calibrate Less energy saving due to wider deadband setting 100 -1000 FC OFF at 600 -1000 FC and ON at 300 -500 FC 3. Astronomical TimeClock Part of BAS or stand -alone component. Provides one control for all perimeter lighting control relays in building. Simple system to setup and operate May need overide during periods of very dark cloud cover N/A Set latitude of building location OFF: 1 to 1.5 hours after sunrise ON: 1 to 1.5 hours before sunset Daylight Control Zone Depth = D (45 0from the skylight edge/ 2 skylight height H) Control lamps in fixtures where daylight level is normally above design light level and DO NOT control ALL lamps in each fixture. Tandem wire ballasts in each lamp to provide inboard/outboard switching for occupant control. O 3 -lamp fixture with lamps denoted by ' *' are on the daylight relay and lamps denoted by ' O ' are not. Diagram above is for a typical open office space. For classroom spaces provide "aba" switching for all light fixtures in room and place the inboard lamp on the daylight control relay. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 ©THE W E I DT GROUP P. 24 More Strategy Details Dimming Daylighting Controls type Continuous Dimming Closed Loop Photosensor & Controller Controller and Photosensor can be separate or single device. For open plan office use at least one sensor per space per floor per orientation. For class room spaces use one sensor controlling all lamps in room_ Electronic Dimming Ballast Use electronic dimming ballasts for all lamps in the daylight control zone. Connect control wires (typically low voltage) from photosensor controller to all dimming ballast in the control zone. advantage Continuous & gradual dimming of the light source improves the occupant comfort & reduces the potential complaints compared to the stepped daylighting control. Additional savings with lumen maintenance: Brand new lighting systems provide 20 to 35% more light than desired to account for the degradation in light output over time. A well - calibrated control system provides additional savings by dimming lamps to the desired light level, with or without daylight. disadvantage Higher first cost compared to stepped daylighting control. sensor range 5 -100 FC calibration Photosensor & Controller Max. dimming setpoint: Set to begin dimming at design light level- typ. 50 FC Min. dimming setpoint: Set to dim no less than 20% of full light output Time delay: Set from 3 to 8 minutes Fade rate: Specify at least a 20 second time fade from min. to max. dimming Control output signal: Specify compatibility with ballast input signal, typically 1 -10 vdc Dimming Ballast Min. dimming range: 10 to 20% No. of ballasts on control: Check the manufactirer's min & max number of ballasts per control �. L L L CM Daylight Control Zone Depth = D ` (2 skylight height H- control fixture lamps within this zone) A Continuous Dimming Photosensor typically views a 60 cone of view of the workplane luminance. For indirect fixture designs it is IMPORTANT to shield or locate sensor below fixture to prevent unwanted light from fixture directly controlling system. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT G R D U P P. 25 Location of Daylight Control zones on plan Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 26 This page is intentionally left blank Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility; Edina; MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 27 a, Lighting Control Strategies Strategy Objectives Reduce electric lighting energy by turning lights off (or down) when they are not needed. Strategy Descriptions Occupancy. sensor control is appropriate for most space types where it is common for lights to be on when no one is present for periods throughout the day. To reduce "False -On's" the sensor should not view out a door or into adjacent spaces. A wall switch is still required to allow occupants to turn lights off when space is occupied. See Appendix C for typical installation diagrams. Dual level occupancy sensor control of lights is applicable for smaller enclosed spaces. The control comprises an occupancy sensor with two switches that control two separate lighting circuits in the room. The circuits connect separate fixtures in the space or separate lamps in each fixture. As the wall - mounted sensor detects occupancy, it switches `on' one of the lighting circuits. The other circuit has to be manually turned `on'. If no occupancy is detected for an extended period, the occupancy sensor switches `off both circuits. if the space has access to daylighting, the savings can increase further. Presently, this type of integrated sensor is manufactured by Lutron, Sensor Switch and Wattstopper. Dual level switching is applicable for rooms with variable light level requirements. Manual switches provide for two or more levels of light a output. These strategies provide greatest savings opportunities when ylr �- switch design follows an inboard - outboard ("b" lamp "a" lamp) scheme per fixture. Dual Level a & b switches at Entry to room Manual dimming is applicable for rooms with concentrated AudioNisual requirements. Electronic dimming ballasts are used with manual dimming controls in place of wall switches. Strategy Lighting Control Strategies Peak Annual hrs Notes ID reduction ireduction LCP01 Private office occupancy sensor control 15% 40% LCP03 Private office dual level occupancy sensor control 20% 45% LCP04 Private office dual level switching 15% 15% LCO01 Open office occupancy sensor control 0% 40% LCO04 Open office dual level switching 10% 10% LCCN1 Conference occupancy sensor control 25% 40% LCCN4 Conference dual level switching 15% 15% LCCN5 Conference manual dimming 25% . 25% LCST1 Storage occupancy sensor control 25% 40% LCME1 Mech /elec occupancy sensor control 50% 70% LCCI1 Corridor occupancy sensor control 5% 20% LCRR1 Restroom occupancy sensor control 35% 55% LCGA1 Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control 25% 40% LCMH1 Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control 0% 20% LCMH4 Vehicle maintenance dual level switching 15% 15% LCWH1 Wash bay occupancy sensor control 20% 35% LCWH4 Wash bay dual level switching 15% 15% LCSH1 Shop occupancy sensor control 15% 30% LCSH4 Shop dual level switching 15% 15% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 28 Lighting Control Results Annual Energy Savings $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 - I Potential Incentive Range $8,000 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Private office occupancy sensor control I Private office dual j I level occupancy sensor control Private office dual level switching - -- -- -- Open office � occupancy sensor control Open office dual level switching Vehicle storage occupancy sensor i control Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control Vehicle maintenance dual level switching I Wash bay occupancy I sensor control Wash bay dual level switching Shop occupancy sensor control Shop dual level switching j Key Points • Savings due to occupancy sensors can be significant for a building with diverse functions and rooms with intermittent use • Depending on the base lighting level and occupancy assumptions, some space types save more than others • If your occupancy patterns are different from those assumed for this model, savings could vary from results presented Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 29 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E 1 DT GROUP P. 30 Lighting Design Strategies Strategy Objectives Reduce electric lighting energy through appropriate lighting equipment selection and layout. Strategy Descriptions The design strategies listed below may combine various characteristics of lamp and fixture type, layout, and surface reflectance (wall, ceiling, etc) to achieve a desired light level in footcandles (fc). Lamp Type is a significant variable for reducing lighting _power density, as shown by the graph to the right. I -- - — Lama Tvae- -Mean Lumens per Watt 1 Incandescent 12 Compact fluorescent 60 Standard metal halide 400 W 58 Pulse start metal halide 450W 79 Standard T8 fluorescent 80 High output T5 fluorescent 80 Standard T5 fluorescent 90 Super T8 fluorescent 94 Fixture Type also influences lighting power density because some types are more efficient than others, considering both quality and quantity of light. For example, indirect or direct/indirect fixtures can provide a better quality of light with less glare, so that light levels and watts /sq. ft. may be reduced. V7 1 P 44 e-. - 00 00 Direct Indirect Direct/indirect Task/ Ambient Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.31 Lighting Design Strategies L0200 Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.95 W /sf 1.45 0.95 3 L0300 Open office indirect system at 50 fc , 1.15 W /sf 1.45 1.15 2 L0400 Open office task (0.3 W /sf) ambient at 30 fc, 0.65 W /sf 1.45 0.65 2 L0500 Open office direct/indirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf 1.45 0.90 2 L01 PO Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf 1.45 1.00 3 L02PO Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf 1.45 0.50 3 L03PO Private office directlindirect system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf 1.45 1.00 2 L04PO Private office direct/indirect system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf 1.45 0.50 2 L05PO Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.5C 1.45 0.50 2 L02CN Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf 1.30 1.15 3 L03CN Conference indirect system at 50 fc, 1.35 W /sf 1.30 1.35 2 L04CN Conference direct/indirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf 1.30 1.10 2 L02WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 W /sf 0.70 0.60 1 L03WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 W /sf 0.70 0.30 1 L04WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 37 ft. o.c., 0.20 W /sf 0.70 0.20 1 Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 L05WH W /sf 0.70 0.12 1 L05MH Vehicle maintenance 2 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.53 W /sf 0.70 0.53 2 L01ST Storage; 0.68 W /sf - 0.80 0.6B 3 L01 ME Mech /elec; 1.28 W /sf 1.50 1.28 3 L01CI Corridor; 0.43 W /sf 0.50 0.43 3 L01 RR Restroom; 0.77 W /sf 0.90 0.77 3 L01GA Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf 0.20 0.17 3 L01SH Shop; 1.19 W /sf 1.40 1.19 3 Important: These are example design strategies that bracket a range of installed watts per sq. ft., based on generic lighting design alternatives. Watts /sq. ft. is the critical metric defining each strategy - not footcandle or system type. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 32 Lighting Design Results Annual Energy Savings Potential Incentive Range $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.9.1 W /sf Open office indirect system at 50 fc , 1.1: W /sf Open office task (0.3 W /sf) ambient at 3( fc, 0.65 W /sf Open office directrindirect system at 40 fc 0.90 W /sf Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8 1.00 W /sf Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8 0.50 W /sf Private office directrindirect system, 50 fc std T8, 1.00 W /sf Private office directlndirect system, 25 fc std T8, 0.50 W /sf Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std Ti ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 W /sf Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture space( 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 W /sf Wash bay 14amp, 8 -foot T8 fixture space( 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 W /sf Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture space( 37 ft. o.c., 0.20 W /sf Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture space( 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 Wlsf Vehicle maintenance 2 -lamp, 8 -foot T1 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.53 W /sf Vehicle storage; 0.17 W/s Shop; 1.19 W/s Key Points • Successful implementation of these strategies requires the power density ranges in the table to the left be • Some lighting design strategies for various space types are not presented here due to small impact, typically due to small area of application. All Lighting Design Results may be found in Appendix B. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 33 More Strategy Details High -Bay Lighting Systems w/ Electronic Ballasts Electronic- ballast based systems offer the opportunity to save additional energy and energy cost compared with magnetic - ballasted products. The following table compares a standard system (magnetic ballast pulse - start 40OW metal halide system) with two alternatives: • Electronic ballasted T5 high output (HO) 4 -lamp fluorescent fixtures • Electronic ballasted 40OW pulse -start metal halide fixtures Ballast Type Magnetic (Standard) Electronic (upgrade) Electronic (upgrade) Lamp Type 40OW Pulse-Start T51 HO (44amp) 40OW Pulse -Start Fixture Count 115 205 100 Initial Lumens per fixture 42,000 20,000 42,000 Mean Lumens per fixture 29,500 18,600 34,000 Total Mean Lumens (approx.) 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 System Watts / Fixture 460 240 420 System Mean Lumens / Watt 64 78 81 System Total Kilowatts 53 49 42 Improvement over Standard 0% 7% 21% Note that the approximate total mean lumens are the same for each system, at 3,400,000 lumens. Both of the upgrade systems listed above (High Output T5 and Metal Halide Pulse Start Electronic) offer the opportunity for reduced wattage design without loss of footcandle level. The electronic ballast systems show greater efficiency since their mean lumen level (after 10,000 hours service time) does not decrease as rapidly as the magnetic ballast system. Thus, the designer need not specify as many lamps (or system watts) for the electronic ballast systems. This results in about 7% savings for the T5/H0 system and about 21 % savings for the 40OW electronic ballast pulse -start metal halide systems. The following table provides an example of a typical high -bay space, in this case a gymnasium. Assume that the design footcandle level is accomplished using 400 Watt Pulse -Start Metal Halide fixtures with fixture quantities just at Code lighting power density (1.0 watts /s.f.). As shown in the table, the electronic ballast alternatives may provide lighting design energy conservation potential without reduction of footcandle levels. Ballast Type Magnetic (Standard) Electronic (upgrade)l Electronic (upgrade) Lamp Type 40OW Pulse -Start T5 / HO (4 -lamp) 40OW Pulse -Start Improvement over Standard 0% 7% 21% Comparable Design (watts / s.f.) 1.00 0.93 0.79 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 34 July 29, 2009 This page is intentionally left blank © THE WEIDT GROUP Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report P. 35 Lighting Technology Strategies Strategy Objectives Reduce electric lighting energy through appropriate lighting equipment selection and layout. Strategy Descriptions Strategies in this section incorporate incremental improvements in technology over the lighting design strategies of the previous section. This can be accomplished by selection of more efficient lamps, ballasts or fixtures. Super T8 Lamps Super T8 lamps along with lower ballast factor than standard provides the same lumen output as Standard T8 lamps, but they use 15% less energy. Additional description of Super T8 technology is provided later in this section. Lighting Technology Strategies M LTE01 Super T -8 lamps Std T8 Super T8 15% LTE02 Extra efficient ballasts Std ballast EE ballast 5% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P.36 Lighting Technology Results Annual Energy Savings Potential Incentive Range Super T-8 lamps 11 I Extra efficient i ----- - - - - -- ballasts i Key Points ■ Super T8 lighting applies to all spaces that have T8 lighting as the base design Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 37 More Strategy Details Super T8 Lighting This page provides further detail in regard to Super T8 Lighting systems (also known as High Performance T8). The Super T8 system is the highest performing 4 -foot T8 fluorescent lighting system currently available, in terms of mean lumens per watt. Super T8 Energy Savings through Design Although the Super T8 lamps provide more lumens than Standard T8, they may be developed into design in such a way to accomplish additional energy savings beyond Standard T8 systems. Combine the Super T8 lamps with an under -driven ballast (that is, ballast factor of 0.71 - 0.77). This combination provides similar lumen output when compared to a standard T8 system, but uses fewer watts. Use conventional ballasts (0.84 -0.88 ballast factor) with Super T8 lamps or overdrive the lamps (1.2 ballast factor.) This allows spacing the fixtures further apart to achieve the strategy watts per square foot and could reduce the total number of fixtures required if the increased fixture spacing achieves acceptable uniformity in light levels. Summary of Lamp attributes (4' length)1 f , > > �' Super T8 Program Literature; Product catalogues from manufacturer websites, Sep 2005. z IS: Instant start; RS: Rapid start; PRS: Programmed rapid start 3 Based on data from manufacturers sales representatives. "Energy Saver" or "Reduced Wattage" lamps are not Super T8s! There are new generation 30W, 28W and 25W T8 lamps, which are called as "Energy Saver" or "Reduced Wattage ". These are NOT the Super T8 lamps. Although these lamps look appealing because of their lower wattage, they have other drawbacks. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 38 Reduced ffattage T8 Nominal Watts 32W 32W 30W, 28W, 25W 28W. 54W Initial lumens 2800 -2950 3100 2850, 2750, 2400 2900 5000 System Efficacy umens/Watt 83 -90 93 -98 88 -92 85 -91 80 Lamp life (hrs) IS ballast 13 hr 15,000-20,000 24,000 15,000-20,000 20,000 (PRS)1 20,000 (PRS)2 CRI 75 -86 82 -86 82 -86 82 -85 82 -85 Dimming Yes Yes No Yes Yes/No Ballast com atibili . a IS, RS, ORS IS, RS, PRS IS (some PS) PRS only PRS only $1.3017amp $2.4017amp Typical lamp / $14.85 3 -1amp $14.95 3 -1amp N/A $7.10/lamp $6.7517amp PRS ballast cost ballast ballast Ballast Cost Ballast Cost Source: Energy Design Resources e -NEWS April 2005• Energy User News April 2003• Xcel Ener f , > > �' Super T8 Program Literature; Product catalogues from manufacturer websites, Sep 2005. z IS: Instant start; RS: Rapid start; PRS: Programmed rapid start 3 Based on data from manufacturers sales representatives. "Energy Saver" or "Reduced Wattage" lamps are not Super T8s! There are new generation 30W, 28W and 25W T8 lamps, which are called as "Energy Saver" or "Reduced Wattage ". These are NOT the Super T8 lamps. Although these lamps look appealing because of their lower wattage, they have other drawbacks. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 38 List of Super T8 Products Manufacturer Product Order Model Color Rated Life (hrs)1 Initial Mean CRI Lumen Name Code Temp Lumens Lumens Maintenance IS RS /PRS F32T8/XU 10327 SPX30 /HU 3000K 24,000 24,000 3100 2915 85 0.94 ECO - F32T8/XU _ _ _ Ecolux High General Electric 10326 SPX35MU 3500K 24,000 24,000 3100 2915 85 0.94 Lumen ECO F32T8 /XU 10322 SPX411HU 4100K 24,000 24,000 3100 2915 82 0.94 ECO 51058 F32S/835 3500K 24,000 24,000 3100 2920 85 0.94 XL 51050 F328/ 41 4100K 24,000 24,000 3100 2920 82 0.94 Maxlite T8 XL Se es 51049 F328/850 5000K 24,000 24,000 3200 3020 85 0.94 1 XL 21680 3000K 18,000 24,0002 3100 2945 85 0.95 S�CD 21697 PSCO 3500K 18,000 24,0002 3100 2945 85 0.95 Osram- Sylvania Octron XPS 21681 4100K 18,000 24,0002 3150 2990 85 0.95 XP3vEC� 139873 F32T81ADV 3000K 20,000 24,000 3100 2950 85 0.95 830 /ALTO 139881 F32T81ADV 3500K 20,000 24,000 3100 2950 85 0.95 Philips Alto Advantage 835 1ALTO 139899 F32T8/ADV 4100K 20,000 24,000 3100 2950 85 0.95 841 /ALTO F32T8/rrite Radiant Triten 50 60766 n 5000K 24,000 24,000 3100 2950 86 0.95 (Westinghouse) Ultra 0/ULTRA/E NV Technical Consumer TCP High 31032850H F32T81850/ 5000K 24,000 24,000 3100 2915 86 0.94 Lumen L HL Products, Inc. Terra -Lux 1920 F32T8/HU8 3500K 24,000 24,000 3100 2915 85 0.94 High Lumen 35 Terra -Lux 1921 F32T8/HL/8 1 4100K 24,000 24,000 3100 2915 85 0.94 SLI Lighting High Lumen 41 Terra -Lux 1923 F32T8/HU8 5000K 24,000 24,000 3100 2915 85 0.94 High Lumen 50 Ushio America ULTRA 8 3000480 F32T8/841/ 4100K 24,000 24,000 3150 2990 86 0.95 Inc. High Lumen HL r Life based on 3 -hr. duty cycle, 2 30,000hrs on an OSRAM - SYLVANIA dedicated PSX ballast © 2006 Consortium for Energy Efficiency , Inc. All rights reserved . Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 39 Base HVAC Efficiency Strategies Strategy Objective Reduce energy use by selecting higher efficiency systems. Cooling Strategy Descriptions Water -to -Water heat pump system with ground loop: Change from code base water -loop heat pump to geothermal water to water heat pump system. Strategy Code Strategy Reference ID Cooling Efficiency Strategies Efficiency lEfficiency ISize Tons Notes MAC01 Water to water heat pump 1.26 kW/ton 0.97 or . .0 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 40 Base HVAC Efficiency Results Annual Energy Savings Potential Incentive Range $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 I - Water -to- water -heat- - -- - - - -- -- - pump Key Points ■ Water -to -water heat pump system shows the highest potential for energy savings. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 41 Fan and Pump Strategies Strategy Objectives Reduce energy use by providing improved efficiency and control systems that reduce both the power required and the level of power needed in response to the building load. Strategy Description Premium efficiency motors: Replace code level motors with Premium Efficiency motors as defined by the NEMA Premium'"' Efficient Motor Program. NEMA specifications for Premium Efficiency motors are tabulated at the end of this section of the report. :Fan and Pump Strategies MMT03 Premium efficiency supply /return fan motors EPACT Premium MMT04 Premium efficiency pump motors EPACT Premium Note: VFDs may be required by code for some building components Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 0 THE WEIDT GROUP P.42 Fan and Pump Results Annual Energy Savings Potential Incentive Range $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Premium efficiency`; I I supplyheturn fan i _I motors - Premium efficiency pump motors Key Points ■ Premium motors show relatively small savings. However, they may still be cost effective, if the first costs are lower. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © TFi E W E I DT GROUP P. 43 Motor Efficiency Tables The tables below list motor efficiencies for code level and strategy levels for different sizes and types of motors. Totally- enclosed fan - cooled motors* Open drip -proof motors* 3600 d rn 3 1200 Code 1800 1200 Premium rpm = c. 3600 1800 1200 3600 1800 1200 77.0% rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm 1 87.5% 82.5% 80.0% 77.0% 85.5% 82.5% 1.5 82.5% 84.0% 84.0% 84.0% 86.5% 86.5% 2 84.0% 84.0% 85.5% 85.5% 86.5% 87.5% 3 84.0% 86.5% 86.5% 85.5% 89.5% 88.5% 5 85.5% 87.5% 87.5% 86.5% 89.5% 89.5% 7.5 87.5% 88.5% 88.5% 88.5% 91.0% 90.2% 10 1 88.5% 89.5% 90.2% 89.5% 91.7% 91.7% 15 89.5% 91.0% 90.2% 90.2% 93.0% 91.7% 20 90.2% 91.0% 91.0% 91.0% 93.0% 92.4% 25 91.0% 91.7% 91.7% 91.7% 93.6% 93.0% 30 91.0% 92.4% 92.4% 91.7% 94.1% 93.6% 40 91.7% 93.0% 93.0% 92.4% 94.1% 94.1% 50 92.4% 93.0% 93.0% 93.0% 94.5% 94.1% 60 1 93.0% 93.6% 93.6% 93.6% 95.0% 94.5% 75 93.0% 94.1% 93.6% 93.6% 95.0% 94.5% 100 93.0% 94.1% 94.1% 93.6% 95.4% 95.0% 125 93.6% 94.5% 94.1% 94.1% 95.4% 95.0% 150 93.6% 95.0% 94.5% 94.1% 95.8% 95.4% 200 1 94.5% 95.0% 94.5% 1 95.0% 95.8% 95.4% Totally- enclosed fan - cooled motors* Code Premium 3600 1800 1200 3600 1800 1200 rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm 75.5% 82.5% 80.0% 77.0% 85.5% 82.5% 82.5% 84.0% 85.5% 84.0% 86.5% 87.5% 84.0% 84.0% 86.5% 85.5% 86.5% 88.5% 85.5% 87.5% 87.5% 86.5% 89.5% 89.5% 87.5% 87.5% 87.5% 88.5% 89.5% 89.5% 88.5% 89.5% 89.5% 89.5% 91.7% 91.0% 89.5% 89.5% 89.5% 90.2% '91.7% 91.0% 90.2% 91.0% 90.2% 91.0% 92.4% 91.7% 90.2% 91.0% 90.2% 91.0% 93.0% 91.7% 91.0% 92.4% 91.7% 91.7% 93.6% 93.0% 91.0% 92.4% 91.7% 91.7% 93.6% 93.0% 91.7% 93.0% 93.0% 92.4% 94.1% 94.1% 92.4% 93.0% 93.0% 93.0% 94.5% 94.1% 93.0% .93.6% 93.6% 93.6% 95.0% 94.5% 93.0% 94.1% 93.6% 93.6% 95.4% 94.5% 93.6% 94.5% 94.1% 94.1% 95.4% 95.0% 94.5% 94.5% 94.1% 95.0% 95.4% 95.0% 94.5% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.8% 95.8% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 1 95.4% 96.2% 95.8% *Code values are from Energy Policy Act of 1992, also reference NEMA Standard MG1 -1998, Revision 2, Section 12.59 and Table 12 -11, as tested in accordance with IEEE Standard 112 Method B. * *Premium values are from NEMA Standard MG1 -2003, Table 12 -12, as tested in accordance with IEEE Standard 112 Method B. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 ©THE W E I DT GROUP P. 44 This page is intentionally left blank Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 ©THE WEIDT GROUP Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report P. 45 Conditioning of Outside Air Strategy Objectives Reduce energy use by adjusting the volume of outside air that needs conditioning according to the actual building load or by recovering heat/cool from return air or equipment. Strategy Description CO2 sensor reset of minimum outside air: CO2 sensors, located in the return air ducts (or the space), are used to reduce ventilation in proportion to the number of occupants served by a system. To implement this strategy, CO2 sensors are added to the return air ducts (or to the space) as needed to ensure that concentrations in the building do not exceed threshold values. The CO2 concentration threshold of roughly 1000 ppm provides ventilation of human and non -human source contaminants (e.g. VOCs, cleaning compounds, etc.). CO control of garage ventilation fans: Carbon monoxide sensors are used to control the garage ventilation fans. The fans will cycle on to maintain carbon monoxide levels below a design threshold. The fans are forced to run at least 10 minutes per hour in order to vent any fumes from fuel or oil spills. Conditioning of Outside Air Stra tegies MOA02 CO2 control of outside air No control CO2 control MOA22 Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans Always on CO control Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report ,July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 46 Conditioning of Outside Air Results Annual Energy Savings Potential Incentive Range $0 - $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $0 "$10;000 $20,000 $30,000 � � I I CO2 control of outside air Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans Key Points ■ The CO control of garage ventilation fans shows the highest potential for savings. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 47 Appendix A. Building Characteristics The following pages show some key building modeling parameters forwarded from the Design Team to The Weidt Group. These parameters have been used to characterize the building in the DOE2 model. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E 1 DT GROUP P. 48 Building Location Address: 7450 Metro Blvd. City: Edina State: Minnesota Envelope Characteristics Select -all- envelope- construction - characteristics -that -apply- -- Walls Wood frame Steel frame Frame w/ masonry exterior Masonry X Metal Interior Floors Wood frame Steel frame Concrete X Window frame types Nonmetal Metal curtainwall/ storefront X Metal punched opening Window treatment (list building areas wt blinds or shades) Roof Construction Select Insulation Position Wood Frame Entirely below metal deck C Steel Frame X A Concrete Roof Insulation Position Key A Entirely above deck/ continuous B Entirely below metal deck C Other/ Combination Window characteristics Value Total U- Factor (winter) 0.44 Center of glass U- Factor (winter) 0.31 Solar heat gain coefficient 0.54 Visible light transmittance 0.76 Edina Nubuc vvorKS racmry, Cuma, iv l-A Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P. 49 l Select schedule that best describes operational use for lights and people use Light Use Medium Use X Heavy Use tsmaing i ype: Utrice /Warehouse Operation Notes O People ■ Lighting 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 50 Minnesota General Service Electric Rate Rate Code A14 Xcel Energy $22 p0 per month Fixed Monthly Charge $10.15 per kW Demand Charge - Summer $6,81 .81 per kW Demand Charge - Winter $0.021 per kWh Energy Charge Energy charge credit per month per kWh in excess of 400 $0.0090 per kWh hours times the billing demand Adiustrn nts: Conservation Improvement Program Adjustment Rider $$0 per kWh 02567 per kWh Fuel Clause Rider $0.000068 per kWh State Energy Policy Rate Rider $p,000683 per kWh Renewable Development Fund Rider $0.00048 per kWh Transmission Cost Recovery Rider $0.00045 per kWh Renewable Energy Standard Cost Recovery Rider $0.56 per kW Environmental Improvement Rider (EIR ) $0.00146 per kWh Environmental Improvement Rider (EIR) $10.71 per kW Total Summer Demand Charge $7,37 per kW Total Winter Demand Charge $0.050899 per kWh Total kWh charge (applied to peak from past 11 months) 50% of annual peak Demand ratchet Summer months: June - September Winter months: October -May Rates reflect May 2008 rider charges Gas Rate Assumed for Model $1.000 per therm Firm Gas Natural Bas fluctuate significantly r based pricing. li sted above I s based on an average o recentyea s and may differ from current rates. Future es may also differ significantly from this value. Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance © THE WEIDT GROUP P. 51 July 29, 20.09 Enter design values. If ceiling height is unknown, enter a safety factor value to allow for over - design. If design reflectances are unknown, enter the assumed reflectances. Horizonal footcand /e levels will be used in daylighting strategies. IESNA FC levels are from the Ninth Edition IESNA Lighting Handbook. Equip W/sf defines the average internal loads from computers, appliances, and production process within each space type. It should include factors for diversity, meaning it should be the peak value for a typical day. Space Type Ceiling Height FT Design Reflectances IESNA FC Level Design FC Level Equip W /SF Ceiling Wall Floor Horiz Vert Horiz Vert Default Actual Private office 10.0 80 50 20.0 30 5 40 10 1.20 1.2 Open office 10.0 80 50 20.0 30 5 40 10 1.20 1.1 Conference 10.0 80 50 20.0 30 5 40 10 0.50 1.05 Storage 10.0 30 30 20.0 10 10 20 10 0.10 0.12 Mech /elec 10.0 30 30 20.0 30 3 30 5 0.20 0.2 Corridor 10.0 80 50 20.0 5 10 20 10 0.10 0.1 Restroom 9.0 80 50 20.0 10 3 20 10 0.10 0.1 Vehicle storage 24.0 30 30 20.0 1 0.5 40 15 0.10 0.5 Vehicle maintenance 25.0 30 30 20.0 50 50 70 60 2.00 2.5 Wash bay 19.0 30 30 20.0 10 10 10 10 0.10 3 Shop 10.0 30 30 20.0 50 50 60 60 0.20 1.5 Dining 10.0 80 50 20.0 10 3 40 10 0.20 Locker Room & Shower 10.0 80 50 20.0 5 3 40 10 0.50 --&Y Energy Design Assistance Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN July 29, 2009 Strategy Report © THE W E I DT GROUP P 52 Number of hot water heater units 4 Hot water tank size, gal per unit 80 Hot water heat source (Gas or Electric) gas H- o-t water heater input rate (per unit, kBTU7hr) 80 Hot water system combustion efficiency (code level) 80% Hot water system combustion efficiency (design level) 94% Hot water system supply temperature, deg F 140 Hot water circulation pump flow, gpm 3.5 Hot water circulation pump head, feet 11 For kitchens: # breakfasts per day 0 For kitchens: # lunches per day 0 For kitchens: # dinners per day 0 Edina FuDIIC woncs racmry, Muuid, MIN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P. 53 Enter or select actual values for each parameter, default values are approximate based on standard space type conditions Enter an X" to identify what type of equipment will be used. Perimeter Zones Zones have fan powered boxes? U 0.14 C fv N 0.05 0.05 aD tM O N 0.10 0.05 0.44 1.43 Space Type 1.30 0.90 1.40 ° t 1.40 ° �' U M Q 0 1.50 p Min CFM ratio � 0.35 v 0 L) o v 0.35 0.35 E 'o 1.00 1.00 E o "U) 0.35 a Design 0.30 0.30 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.30 M 1.00 1.00 1.00 U Heat Pump J j ...: Air Flow Type CV ' X X X X X X VAV X X X X X X Cooled Zone X X X X X X X Heated Zone X X X X X X X X X X X Perimeter Zones Zones have fan powered boxes? Default 0.14 0.14 0.40 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 1.50 0.10 0.05 0.44 1.43 Supply CFM /SF 1.30 0.90 1.40 0.80 0.50 1.40 0.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.90 1.50 0.25 Min CFM ratio Default 0.35 0.35 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 Design 0.30 0.30 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 Heat Pump Core zones Zones have fan powered boxes ?: Default 0.14 0.14 0.40 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 1.50 0.10 0.05 0.44 1.43 Supply CFM /SF 1.00 0.90 1.30 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 0.80 1.50 0.25 Min CFM ratio Default 0.35 0.35 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 Design 0.30 0.30 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 0.40 Heat Pump Ventilation OA CFM/SF. Default 0.14 0.14 0.40 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 1.50 0.10 0.05 0.44 1.43 0.50 Design 0.10 0.10 0.31 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.00 1.50 1 1.72 1.50 0.25 Electric coil Zone heat source HW.coil X X X X X X X X X HW base board Electric coil Electric baseboard Heat Pump Gas furnace X X Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E 1 DT GROUP P. 54 Air Handler Type Place an 7C' for type Central cooling/ terminal reheat X X X X X Four pipe fan coil Water loop heat pump- - - — — Ground heat pump X X Packaged single zone units Packaged terminal AIC Dedicated outside air system (DOAS) Exhaust fan Fan Control P Place an 7r" for type Constant volume X X X Variable air volume X XI X X X Airflow Variables E Enter data for each air handler Supply cfm 7 7,590 7 7,835 3 3,750 1 133,800 1 10,000 Minimum outside air cfm 1 1,500 1 1,700 1 1,500 1 133,800 2 2,000 Design Min % outside air 2 20% 2 22% 4 40 % 1 100% 2 20 % Is Outside air delivered by DOAS? 1,500 1 1,500 1 133,800 2 2,000 Expected Exhaust kdm (1) 1 1,255 1 for b building pressurization a and toilet exhaust (1) This is the expected exhausi from the air h handler after accounting f Economizer control P Place an %f' for control type None X Air -side economizer (non - integrated) X X X X X X X Air -side econo ( ntegrated) Drycooler Water -side economizer 7C' for control type; t this applies t to VAV systems only outside air control P Place an 7 Fixed dm X X X X X X X X X Proportional w supply _ — .,, — er.. Fan Static metal Note: Fan static values should include effects of ductwork, diffusers, Supply (including filters), inches we 1.25 125 125 2.50 5.33 Filters only, inches we 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 1.00 Return, inches we 0.25 0.25 0.25 Exhaust, inches we 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Fan horsepower (it available) Supply tan hp 15.00 15.00 5.00 40.00 15.00 Return fan hp Exhaust tan hp 1.50 1.50 1 0.50 45.00 Humidity Control Enter data for each air handler Maximum setpoint Minimum setpoint Heating Plant / System Place an 7r" for system type Hot water coil X X Gas bumer X X Electric resistance Heat pump Other. Cooling Plant f System No cooling Air cooled chiller Water cooled chiller . Heat pump District cooling Direct expansion system data below Air cooled DX packaged or split Air cooled DX condensing units Evap. Cooled DX Rooftops Base design efficiency, EER Does EER above include evaporator fan? Alternate design efficiency, EER Does EER above include evaporator fan? Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 55 July 29, 2009 Other. Cooling Plant f System No cooling Air cooled chiller Water cooled chiller . Heat pump District cooling Direct expansion system data below Air cooled DX packaged or split Air cooled DX condensing units Evap. Cooled DX Rooftops Base design efficiency, EER Does EER above include evaporator fan? Alternate design efficiency, EER Does EER above include evaporator fan? Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 55 July 29, 2009 Edina Public Works Facility Ground heat pump system characteristics Strategy Description Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Alternate 3 Altern ate 4 Notes Unit size, Tons 20 Ht pump, gas, electric or none Economizer None None or max % outside air Loop field pump data - Number of pumps enter avg. or attach a fist Approx. no. of ur it _ 3 Pump flow, gpm/ton 3.14 Cooling FER, Btu/Wau 14 - Pump head, ft 75 entering water temp 80 I Pump GPM (total of all pumps) for EER fisted above ant air temp (db) 80.61 1 Pumps have VFDs? (Y or M for EER listed above ant air temp (xb) 662 VFD, 2- speed, staging, or None If VFD, min flow ratio for EER fisted above Heating efficiency, COP 2.5 Pumps use head pressure reset control? (Y or N) y entering water temp 30 Bufldrng loop pump data (leave blank if one pump is serves both loop field and heat pumps) , for COP fisted above ant a'v temp (db) 68 Pump head (ft water) for COP listed above Outside air fan data Supply fan static, in 1 Pump GPM (total of all pumps) 135 total static Supply fan stati c, in 1.5 Return fan static, in 1 If applicable Preheat elec Ht pump, gas, electric or none Economizer None None or max % outside air Loop field pump data - Number of pumps 2 Pump flow, gpm/ton 3.14 - Pump head, ft 75 Pump GPM (total of all pumps) 168 I if known Pumps have VFDs? (Y or M y VFD, 2- speed, staging, or None If VFD, min flow ratio 33% Pumps use head pressure reset control? (Y or N) y Bufldrng loop pump data (leave blank if one pump is serves both loop field and heat pumps) , Number of pumps 2 I Pump head (ft water) 75 Pump GPM (total of all pumps) 135 if known Pump flow, gpm/ton 2.5 Pumps have VFDs? (Y or N) y If VFD, min flow ratio Pumps use head pressure reset control? (Y or N) Loop field well data Number of wells 128 Tors per well 1.1 if known Well depth, ft 250. Well spacing, ft 20 on center Fluid type Prop Propylene glyco, Ethylene glycol, etc Percent glycol If bore test result are availible, please send as attachment 30% xcel tnergy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 56 Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance P. 57 July 29, 2009 THE W E I DT GROUP Capacity for heating (Tons) 48.6 Capacity for cooling (Tons) 53.6 ____ Heating water design setpoint 120 Heating water primary pump (attaches to condenser) Number of pumps 3 Pump head, ft water 75 GPM (total of all pumps) 168 Pumps have VFDs? (Y or N) n Primary loop min flow rati o 0.2 Pumps use head pres sure reset control? (Y or N) n Heating water secondary pump (where applicable, attaches to building loads) Number of pumps 2 Pump head, ft water 80 GPM (total of all pumps) 135 Pumps have VFDs? (Y or N) y Primary loop min flow ratio 0.2 Pumps use head pressure reset control? (Y or N) y Well loop pump Number of pumps 2 Total Pump head, ft water 75 Static head, ft water (for open systems) GPM (total of all pumps) 168 Pumps have VFDs? (Y or N) y Primary loop min flow ratio 25 Pumps use head pressure reset control? (Y or N) y Average monthly loop temperature (default is weather file ground temperature) January February March April May June July August September October November December Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance P. 57 July 29, 2009 THE W E I DT GROUP Appendix B. Detailed Results The following pages provide detailed energy analysis results in terms of cost, consumption, and demand calculations for the base building and all strategies. ei energy Energy Design Assistance Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN En July 29, 2009 Strategy Report © THE WEIDT GROUP P 58 Edina Public Works Facility Energy Costs Appendix B 144, / T D 2Ml.r 1 . Itemized Costs Totals per bldg s . ft - Totals for Building > w E o we m c n a m - o c t > m c cA c 2 o <J LL ❑ W Qw B� Code Base; CODE1 $.361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $127 $.371 57.43 $207,047 assemby;_EWC01_ _ $.341 _$.055_ _5.509 f.006 _$.127_ $.377 _ $7.41 $0.02 7.4% _ E2D4,144 $2,903 __R-16.well R -20 all assembly, EWCO2 $.336 5.055 $.508 $ -006 $.127 $371 $1.40 $0.03 1.9% $203,153 $3,894 R -16 wall assembly, EWC03 $352 $.055 $.510 $.(106 E.127 3371 $1.42 $0.01 0.6% $205,799 $7,248 R-20 wag assembly, EWCD4 $350 $.056 $.510 $.006 $.127 $371 $1.42 $0.01 0.8% $205,426 $1,621 R -24 roof assembly, ERC01 $.359 $.055 $.511 $.006 5.127 $ -371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,750 $297 R -30 roof assembly, ER002 5.348 $.054 $.509 $.DDS $.127 $371 $IA1 _ $0.02 1.1% $204,822 $2,225 R -40 roof assembl ER003 $.338 $.054 $.507 $.BOB $.127 $371 $1.40 $0.03 1.9% $203,163 $3,884 , Lo E clear 1/ alum frame; WO601 $.349 $.056 $.510 $.006 $127 $.371 $1.42 $0.01 0.8% $205,417 $1,631) Lo E tint 11 alum frame; W0901 5.354 $.054 $.509 $.006 5.127 $377 $1.42 $0.01 0.6% $205,767 $1,280 Lo E Gear, high vLVble transmittance/ alum frame; W1201 $363 $.054 $.509 $.006 $127 $371 $1.42 $0.01 0.7% $205,646 $1,401 Lo E tint. high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1301 $356 &'.053 $.509 $.006 $127 5.371 $1.42 $0.01 0.6% $205,612 $1,235 VE-a5#2; W5101 &350 $ -056 $.SID $.DDB 5.127 5.377 $1.42 $0.01 0.7% $205,558 $1,489 Stepped daylighling control at veh. Slor & lock =a.; D3101 $.360 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.123 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.3% $206,375 $672 Dimming daylighting control at open office & dinin ; D3102 $.363 $.054 $.513 $206 5.121 $371 $1.43 $0.00 02% 5206,560 $487 Private office occupancy sensor control; LCPO7 $.361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,954 $93 Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 $.361 $.054 $.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,935 $112 Private office dual level switching; LCP04 $.381 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 5.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,996 $51 Open office occupancy sensor control; LC001 $362 $.054 $.511 $.006 $125 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,967 $80 Open office dual level switching; LCO04 $.361 $.055 5.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,991 $56 Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCN1 $361 $.055 $.511 $.DD6 $A26 $371 $1.43 $0-DO 0.0% $207,034 $13 Conference dual level switching; LCC144 $.361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,039 $8 Conference manual dimming; LCCNS $361 5.055 $.571 $.006 5.127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,041 $6 Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST1 $.361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $377 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,036 $11 Mechlelac occupancy sensor control; LCME1 $361 $.055 $.511 5.006 $127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,047 SO Corridor occupancy sensor control; LCCI7 $361 $.055 $.517 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1 A3 $0.00 0.0% $207,042 $5 Restmm occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 $361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 &0.00 0.0% $207,023 $24 Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGA1 $360 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.123 $377 $1.43 $0 -DO 0.3% $206,398 $649 Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMH1 $.364 $.054 $.511 $.006 $.121 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.3% $206,513 $534 Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 $.364 $.054 5.512 $.006 5.123 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,868 $179 Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH1 $.362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.125 5377 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,968 $79 Wash bay dual level switching; LCWH4 $.361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,997 $SD Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSH1 $362 $.054 $.511 $.006 $.125 5.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,990 $57 Shop dual level swiichin ; LCS144 $361 $.055 $.511 $.006 5.126 $371 $IA3 $0.00 0.0% $206,999 $48 Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.95 W /sf; L0200 $362 $.054 $.512 5.006 $.124 $371 $7.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,615 $232 Open office indirect system at 50 fc. 1.15 Wlst; L0300 $361 5.054 $.511 $.006 $.125 8371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,907 $140 Open office task (0.3 W /sf) ambient at 30 fc. 0.65 W /sf; L0400 $362 $.054 $.512 $.006 $.124 $.371 $1.43 $O.OD 0.1% $206,815 $232 Open office dinecdmdirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 Wlsf; LD500 $362 5.054 $.512 $.006 $.124 $.371 57.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,794 $253 Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 Wlsl; LO1PO 5361 $.055 $.511 $.DD6 $.126 $371 $1 A3 $0.D0 0.0% $206,947 $100 Private office direct system, 30 ic, std TB, 0.50 W /st L02PO $361 $.054 $.511 $.006 $.125 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,857 $190 Private office directlrndined system, 50 fc, ski T8, 1.00 WlsF L03PO $361 $.055 $.511 $.DD6 $.126 5.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $206,947 $100 Private office dtreclmdinad system, 25 fe, aid TB, 0.50 Wlsf; L04P0 $361 5.054 $.511 $.OD6 $.125 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,857 $790 Private office task aQ 0.3 W /sf, std TS ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 W /st L05PO $361 $.054 5.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $206,923 $124 $5 Conference direct system at 50 fe, 1.15 Wlsf; L02CN $361 5.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,042 Conference indirect system at 50 fc, 1.35 WlsF L03CN $360 5.055 5.511 $.006 $.127 $377 $1.43 ($0.00) 0.0% $207,049 ($2) Conference directfindhed system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf, L04CN $361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $371 31 A3 $0.00 0.0% $207,039 $6 Wash bay 14amp, 8-foot TS fodnse spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 Wlsk L02WH $.361 5.055_ $.511 $.OD6 $126 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,000 $47 $62 Wash bay 14amp, &toot T8 fomse spaced 25 R o.c., 0.30 Wlsf, L03WH $363 $.055 $.512 $.006 5 -123 5371 $1.43 $0.D0 0.0% $206,985 Wash bay 14amp, 8400t TS fixture spaced 37 ft. o.c., 020 W /sf, L04WH $363 $.055 $.512 $.006 $.122 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 02% $206,954 $93 Wash bay 14amp. 8-foot TB fodure spaced 60 R o.c., 0.12 Wlsf; LOSWH $364 $.055 5.512 $.006 $ -122 $377 $1.43 50.00 0.1% $206,933 $114 Vehicle maintenance 2-tamp. 8400t TO future spaced 25 R. o.c., 0.53 Wls , LOSMH $364 $.053 $.510 $.006 $.119 $.371 $7.42 $0.01 0.4% $206,141 $906 $11 Storage; 0.68 Wlsf; L01ST $361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $127 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,036 Machlelm; 128 Wlsf, LDIME $361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,047 $0 Corridor. 0.43 Wlst-, L01CI 5.361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,019 $28 Restroom; 0.77 Wlsf, L01RR $361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,031 $16 Vehicle storage; 0.17 W1st LOIGA $361 $.055 E.512 $ -006 5119 $.371 $1.42 $0.01 OS% $206,022 $1,025 Shop; 1.19 W /st L01SH E.361 $.055 5.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $7A3 $0.00 0.0% $206,999 $48 Super T-8 lamps; LTEOI 5.367 $.053 1.512 $.OD6 $.108 $.371 $1.42 $0.01 1).9% $205,144 $1,903 Extra efficient ballasts; LTED2 $363 $.054 E.512 $.006 $.127 E -371 $1.43 $0.00 0.3% $206,516 $531 Water to water heat pump; MAC01 $.155 5.037 $.450 $.BOfi $.127 E.371 57.75 $028 19.9% $765,906 $41,141 Ground heat pump, Alternate 1; MGH01 $165 $.041 $.437 $.006 $127 $.371 $1.15 $028 19.8% $166,124 540,923 Premium efficiency suppylretum fan motors; MMT03 5.362 $.055 $.505 $.006 5.127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.3% $206,397 $650 Premium afiieiency pump motors; MMT04 &.361 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $7.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,007 $40 CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 5330 5.053 $.504 $ -006 $.127 5.371 $1.39 $0.04 2.8% $201,276 $5,771 Carbon monoride sensor control of garage vent fans; MOA22 $365 $.063 $.205 $.DO6 $.127 $.371 $1.14 $029 205% $164,622 $42,425 Xcel Energy Edina Public works Vaauty, tafna, rotry Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP. P.59 Edina Public Works Facility Annual Energy by Fuel Source 144,776 SQ.FT. Appendix B Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report © THE WEIDT GROUP P 62 Annual Energy Annual Electric Annual Gas 3 m > _ m to m Ll 3 Code Base; CODE? 10,217 2,796,438 675 R -16 wall assembly, EWC01 10,075 141 1% 2,755,090 41,348 1% 675 0 0% R -20 wall assembly; EWCO2 10,035 182 2% 2,743,094 53,344 2% 675 0 0% R -16 wall assembly; EWC03 10,151 66 1% 2,777,099 19,339 1% 675 0 0% R -20 wall assembly; EWCD4 10,134 83 1% 2,772,126 24,312 1% 675 0 0% R -24 roof assembly; ERC01 10,204 13 0% 2,792,703 3,735 0% 675 0 0% R -30 roof assembly; ERCO2 10,128 88 1% 2,770,579 25,859 1% 675 0 0% R40 roof assembly; ERC03 10,058 158 2% 2,750,654 45,784 2% 673 2 0% Lo E dear 11 alum frame; W0601 10,144 73 1% 2,775,070 21,368 1% 675 0 0% Lo E tint 1/ alum frame; W0901 10,169 48 0% 2,782,425 14,013 1% 675 0 0% Lo E dear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1201 10,162 54 1% 2,760,552 15,886 1% 675 0 0% Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1301 10,178 38 0% 2,785,231 11,207 0% 675 0 0% VE -85 #2; W5101 10,149 68 1% 2,776,602 19,836 1% 675 0 0% Stepped daylighfing control at veh. Stor & lock rms.; D3101 10,188 29 0% 2,788,042 8,396 0% 675 0 0% Dimming'daylighting control at open office & dining; D3102 10,173 44 0% 2,783,686 12,752 0% 675 0 0% Private office occupancy sensor control; LCP01 10,209 7 0% 2,794,341 2,097 0% 675 0 0% Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 10,208 9 0% 2,793,934 2,504 0% 675 0 0% Private office dual level switching; LCP04 10,213 3 0% 2,795,437 1,001 0% 675 0 0% Open office occupancy sensor control; LCOOt 10,209 7 0% 2,794,320 2,118 0% 675 0 0% Open office dual level switching; LCO04 10,213 4 0% 2,795,279 1,159 0% 675 0 0% Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCN7 10,216 1 0% 2,796,225 213 0% 675 0 0% Conference dual level switching; LCCN4 10,216 0 0% 2,796,330 108 0% 675 0 0% Conference manual dimming; LCCN5 10,216 0 0% 2,796,400 38 0% 675 0 0% Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST1 10,216 0 0% 2,796,374 64 0% 675 0 0% Mech/elec occupancy sensor control; LCME1 10,217 0 0% 2,796,438 0 0% 675 0 0% Condor occupancy sensor control; LCCI1 10,217 (0) 0% 2,796,511 (73) 0% 675 0 0% Restroom occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 10,215 2 0% 2,795,915 523 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGA1 10,190 27 0% 2,788,553 7,885 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMH1 10,192 25 0% 2,789,189 7,249 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 10,197 19 0% 2,790,745 5,693 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH7 10,209 8 0% 2,794,177 2,261 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay dual level switching; LCWH4 10,213 4 0% 2,795,408 1,030 0% 675 0 0% Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSHt 10,211 6 0% 2,794,677 1,761 0% 675 0 0% Shop dual level switching; LCSH4 10,212 5 0% 2,795,017 1,421 0% 675 0 0% Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.95 W /sf; L0200 10,199 18 0% 2,791,273 51165 0% 675 0 0% Open office indirect system at 50 fc , 1.15 W /sf; L0300 10,206 11 0% 2,793,2a2 3,156 0% 675 0 0% Open office task (0.3 Wlsf) ambient at 30 fc, 0.65 W /sf; L0400 10,199 18 0% 2,791,273 5,165 0% 675 0 0% Open office directrindirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf; LO500 10,197 19 0% 2,790,824 5,614 0% 675 0 0% Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf; L01 PO 10,210 7 0% 2,794,374 2,064 0% 675 0 0% Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf, L02PO 10,203 13 0% 2,792,564 3,874 0% 675 0 0% Private office direct/indirect system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf, L03PO 10,210 7 0% 2,794,374 2,064 0% 675 0 0% Private office direcifindirect system, 25 fc, std Ta, 0.50 W /sf; L04PO 10,203 13 0% 2,792,564 3,874 0% 675 0 0% Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf,.std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 W /sf; L05PO 10,208 9 0% 2,793,919 2,519 0% 675 0 0% Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf; L02CN 10,216 0 0% 2,796,368 70 0% 675 0 0% Conference indirect system at 50 fc , 1.35 W /sf; L03CN 10,217 (0) 0% 2,796,491 (53) 0% 675 0 0% Conference diredlndirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf; L04CN 10,216 0 0% 2,796,326 112 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 14amp, 8 -Toot T8 fixture spaced 121L o.c., 0.60 W /sf; L02WH 10,213 3 0% 2,795,469 969 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 14amp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 25 fi. o.c., 0.30 W /sf; L03WH 10,204 13 0% 2,792,689 3,749 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot Ta fixture spaced 37 fl. o.c., 0.20 W /sf; L04WH 10,201 15 0% 2,791,945 4,493 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 1 -lamp, &foot T8 fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 W /sf, LO5WH 10,200 17 0% 2,791,460 4,978 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle maintenance 2 -lamp, 8 -foot TS fixture spaced 25 fL o.c., 0.53 Wlsf; L05MH 10,185 32 0% 2,787,132 9,306 0% 675 0 0% Storage; 0.68 W /sf; L01ST 10,216 0 0% 2,796,308 130 0% 675 0 0% Mech/elec; 1.28 W /sf; L01 ME 10,217 0 0% 2,796,438 0 0% 675 0 0% .Corridor, 0.43 W /sf; LO1CI 10,216 1 0% 2,796,190- 246 0% 675 0 0% Restroom; 0.77 W /sf; L01 RR 10,215 1 0% 2,796,100 338 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf; L01GA 10,159 57 1% 2,779,710 16,726 1% 675 0 0% Shop; 1.19 W /sf; L01SH 10,212 5 0% 2,795,017 1,421 0% 675 0 0% Super T-8 lamps; LTE01 10,112 104 1% 2,765,872 30,566 1% 675 0 0% - Extra efficient ballasts; LTE02 10,182 34 0% 2,786,409 10,029 0% 675 0 0% Water to water heat pump; MAC01 8,790 1,427 14% 2,378,311 418,127 15% 675 0 0% Ground heat pump, Alternate 1; MGH01 8,819 1,398 14% 2,386,791 409,647 15% 675 0 0% Premium efficiency supply /return fan motors; MMT03 10,175 42 .0% 2,784,094 12,344 0% 675 (0) 0% Premium efficiency pump motors; MMT04 10,215 2 0% 2,795,843 595 0% 675 0 0% CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 10,024 192 2% 2,740,045 56,393 2% 675 0 0% Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans; MOA22 7,385 2,831 28% 2,122,038 674,400 24% 145 530 79% Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report © THE WEIDT GROUP P 62 Edina Public Works Facility Air Pollution 144,776 SQ.FT. Appendix B Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, taina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 63 N O y iG [A > N O m O > N N C N N T t0 O 10 f0 C O E 0 N E x 2 ) x N > C N _T N 'm E C ' - 0 E U O O E Nwg O . O E O Z m CC m d E L w-E N m _ Code Base; CODE1 2,002 4.92 4.32 0.33 2,012 R -16 wall assembly; EWC01 1,973 29 4.85 0.07 4.26 0.06 0.32 0.00 1,983 29.2 R -20 wall assembly, EWCO2 1,965 37 4.83 0.09 4.24 0.08 0.32 0.01 1,974 37.6 R -16 wall assembly; EWC03 1,989 14 4.89 0.03 4.30 0.03 0.33 0.00 1,998 13.6 R -20 wall assembly, EWC04 1,985 17, 4.88 0.04 4.29 0.04 0.32 0.00 1,995 17.1 R -24 roof assembly. ERCO1 1,999 3 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 2.6 R -30 roof assembly, ERCO2 1,984 18 4.87 0.05 4.29 0.04 0.32 0.00 1,993 18.2 R•40 roof assembly-, ERC03 1,970 32 4.84 0.08 4.25 0.07 0.32 0.01 1,979 32.4 Lo E dear 1/ alum frame; W0601 1,987 15 4.88 0.04 4.29 0.03 0.33 0.00 1,997 15.1 Lo E tint 11 alum frame; W0901 1,992 10 4.90 0.02 4.30 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,002 9.9 Lo E clear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1201 1,991 11 4.89 0.03 4.30 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,000 11.2 Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1301 1,994 8 4.90 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,004 7.9 VE -85 #2; W5101 1,988 141 4.89 0.03 4.29 0.03 0.33 0.00 1,998 14.0 Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor & lock rms.: D3101 1,996 6 4.91 0.01 4.31 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,006 5.9 Dimming daylighting control at open office & dining; D3102 1,993 9 4.90 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,003 9.0 Private office occupancy sensor control; LCPOt 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.5 Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 2,000 2 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.8 Private office dual level switching; LCP04 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 OM 0.33 0.00 2,011 0.7 Open office occupancy sensor control; LC001 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 O.OD 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.5 Open office dual level switching; LC004 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 0.8 Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCNt 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.2 Conference dual level switching; LCCN4 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.1 Conference manual dimming; LCCN5 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.0 Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST1 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 O.OD 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.0 Mech/elec occupancy sensor control; LCME1 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.0 Corridor occupancy sensor control; LCCI1 2,002 (0) 4.92 (0.00) 4.32 (0.00) 0.33 (0.00) 2,012 (0.1) Restroom occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 0.4 Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGA7 1,997 6 4.91 0.01 4.31 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,006 5.6 Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMH1 1,997 5 4.91 0.01 4.31 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,007 5.1 Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 1,998 4 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,008 4.0 Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH1 2,001 2 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.6 Wash bay dual level switching; LCWH4 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 0.7 Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSH1 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.2 Shop dual level switching; LCSH4 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 1.0 Open office Bred system at 50 ic, 0.95 W /sf; L0200 1,998 4 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,008 3.6 Open office indirect system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf; L0300 2,000 2 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,009 2.2 Open office task (0.3 W /sf) ambient at 30 fc, 0.65 W /sf, L0400 1,998 4 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,008 3.6 Open office diredlmdirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf; L0500 1,998 4 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,008 4.0 Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf, L01P0 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.5 Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf, L02P0 1,999 3 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 2.7 Private office direcVindired system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf; L03P0 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.5 Private office directlindirect system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf; L04P0 1,999 3 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 2.7 to office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 W /sf; L05P0 2,000 2 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,010 1.8 Conference direct system at 50 fc. 1.15 W /sf, L02CN 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.0 Conference indirect system at 50 fc, 1.35 W /st L03CN 2,002 (0) 4.92 (0.00) 4.32 (0.00) 0.33 (0.00) 2,012 (0.0) Conference direollndirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /st,, L04CN 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.1 sh bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 W /sf, L02WH 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 0.7 sh bay 1 -lamp, 8400t T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 W /sf; L03WH 1,999 3 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 2.6 sh bay 1 -lamp, 8400t T8 fixture spaced 37 fL o.c., 0.20 W /sf, L04WH 1,999 3 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 3.2 sh bay 1 -lamp, 8-foot T8 fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 W /st L05WH 1,999 3 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2.008 3.5 nance 2 -lamp, 8400t T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.53 W /s$ L05MH 1,996 7 4.90 0.02 4.31 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,005 6.6 Storage; 0.68 W /sf; L01ST 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.1 Mech/elec; 128 W /sf; LO1ME 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.0 Corridor, 0.43 W /sf; L01CI 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,012 0.2 Restroom; 0.77 W /sf; L01RR 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 0.2 Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf; L01GA 1,990 12 4.89 0.03 4.30 0.03 0.33 0.00 2,000 11.8 Shop; 1.19 W /sF L01SH 2,001 1 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 1.0 Super T-8 lamps; LTEO1 1,981 21 4.87 0.05 4.28 0.05 0.32 0.00 1,990 21.6 Extra efficient ballasts; LTE02 1,995 7 4.90 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,005 7.1 Water to water heat pump; MACO1 1,709 293 4.18 0.74 3.69 0.64 0.28 0.05 1,717 294.9 Ground heat pump. Alternate 1; MGH01 1,715 287 4.20 0.72 3.70 0.63 0.28 0.05 1,723 288.9 Premium efficiency supply/return fan motors; MMT03 1,993 9 4.90 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,003 8.7 Premium efficiency pump motors; MMT04 2,002 0 4.92 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,011 0.4 CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 1,963 40 4.82 0.10 4.24 0.09 0.32 0.01 1,972 39.8 Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans; MOA22 1,498 504 3.73 1.19 3.26 1.07 0.25 0.08 1,505 506.7 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, taina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 63 Appendix C. Lighting Control Sequences and Schematics The following guidelines provide greater background through conceptual schematics and sequences toward effective installation of lighting controls. Introduction The sections on each space type are laid out in the same manner and include the following elements. Each lighting control design strategy contains a plan-view diagram for each control scenario. The text describes the device types to use, the device features and settings that work best, and suggestions for sensor locations. Pattern Symbol Legend Below are the symbols for lighting controls and electrical devices that are used. Dimmer wall I D switch Photoswitch Wallbox occupancy sensor 1&9.—OS Photosensor Ls Ceiling -mount occupancy sensor G Local master controller Wall -mount os occupancy Junction box sensor Transformer relay TR 110V or 277V power line Time Clock Low voltage power line. Note: Generic control devices are used in the strategies. To use the strategies most effectively, you should consult the manufacturer's technical specifications to check actual coverage templates (pattern, distance, and sensitivity), required coverage overlap, control feature options, calibration setting limits, ambient temperature sensitivity range, and electric load requirements (where applicable). xcel Energy Edina Public.Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 64 Open Offices Design Pattern Occupancy Responsive Occupancy Sensor Savings Application and Savings -- -+00 - Occupancy sensor-control -is-good - for .open- plan- offices_that have long total hours of operation 0 8D (10-12 hr /day or more) but have fewer users outside oft raditional office hours. Without controls, 60 cleaning crews or one worker may keep lights on in large unoccupied areas for long periods. 40 i Large open office areas can be divided into zones controlled by occupancy sensors so that lights 20 are turned down or off in areas that aren't occupied. Most of the lighting energy will be saved ° outside of traditional working hours since it is unusual for all workers within a coverage zone to iz 4 B iz 4 e iz Tine of Day be absent during regular working hours. Energy savings typically range from 15-25%. Tvnical sensor One occupancy sensors (OS) and one transformer relay (TR) for each of nvo overlapping detection zones. Design Considerations • Small separate lighting zones will give the most energy savings because it is often the case that not all work zones are occupied at the same time. • Use transformer relays (TR) to control . fixtures from low- voltage sensor signals. • Provide manual switches to turn lights off also. Control Devices . Occupancy Sensor —Use ultrasonic sensors for spaces with high partitions. In most cases, 6-8 work stations can be sensed from one ultrasonic sensor. — Use passive - infrared or dual -mode sensors when partitions are low or not present and coverage limits need to be tightly controlled to reduce "false ons" — Use personal -work- station occupancy sensors in spaces with task lights and multiple electrical devices. Device Locations • Good overlap of sensor coverage is mandatory. The design pattern shows two sensors controlling two separate switch legs. The coverage zones overlap the fixtures controlled by one row to maintain adequate far -field illumination for the work stations in adjacent areas. Cautions: • Inadequate sensor overlap will turn lights off too close to occupied work stations. • Avoid detecting motion in main circulation aisles. Recommended Features • Automatic on/off • Time -out setting range to 30 minutes Recommended Settings • Set the time -out setting in the high range, (15 -25 minutes) to reduce the inconvenience of "false- offs." • Adjust the sensitivity calibration after all furnishings are in place. When work stations are rearranged or altered, it is a good idea to verify and adjust sensor coverage. Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance P. 65 July 29, 2009 0 THE W E I DT GROUP Open Offices Design Pattern Savings 10D 0 80 IL C L 40 to J 20 o 12 4 8 12 4 8 12 Typical DayTifhPtrBN — Daylighting Photosensor Application and Savings Daylighting is a cost - effective strategy for perimeter open office areas where windows or skylights provide a significant contribution of daylight and occupancy is heavy during daylight hours. Continuous dimming control provides an almost imperceptible change in light level and fixture brightness. The 15 -20' -wide perimeter daylight zone in most office buildings can be as much as 30-60% of total floor area. Lighting energy use savings range from 30 -60 %. ----------------- - - - - -- ------------------------------ a al a aF a I BLS; I LM �b�I aj L� a i a.= Itemate side wall cation---------- - - - -\- -i- b ; b I ib b i b b b Daylight Zone Depth: 12' -16' Sensor ovation• 8 -12' from window Photosensor (LS.-5 controlling two rows ofQlights (with dimming ballasts near windows) connected to local master controller (LMC) for adjustment and future connection to other derives. Design Considerations • Control lights in a zone parallel to the window within a depth of 2 -2.5 times the window head height. • If the window head height is greater than 10', consider using two daylighting zones controlled by different photosensors. Use the first zone to control the two rows of lights nearest to the windows and the second zone to control lights further back from the window. • Use separate daylighting control circuits and sensors for areas with different window orientations. Control Devices • Photosensor – Local master controller –Dimming ballasts that dim to 10-20% for fixtures in daylight zone (a) Cautions: • Photoswitch sensors, which turn lights on or off, are not advisable for the office environment unless daylight supplies the required light level nearly all of the time to minimize switching. Device Locations • Follow the manufacturer's recommend- ations for the specific device. Generally: • Mount sensor on the ceiling viewing down or on the near side wall measuring the light level on the wall surface. • Locate sensor at 1/2-2/3 the depth of the daylighting zone back from the window. • If indirect lighting is used, make sure sensor is located below the fixture. Recommended Features • Sensing range from 5 to over 150 FC • Local master controller with maximum and minimum set -point • Closed -loop logic design • Options: – Allows automatic incorporation of tuning and lumen- maintenance strategies. –Allows addition of manual dimming at little added first cost. Recommended Settings • Follow manufacturer's recommendations Generally: • Set maximum light level at design FC • Set minimum light level to make the space feel adequately lighted, usually 20- 30% of full light output. xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE W E 1 DT G R O U P P. 66 Private Offices Design Pattern Sa_v_ings 1DD o so CL 60 r 40 J 2D — e 0 12 4 8 12 4 8 12 Time of Day Occupancy Responsive Occupancy Sensor Application and Savings - Occupancy- sensor -control_is_good for most - private ffi oces_where it is common for the occupant to be "in the office" but away from their desk for short or long periods throughout the day. Sensor type is dependent on size of room, furniture arrangement, and door opening locations. Energy savings typically range from 35-65% based on how much the room is occupied and how diligently the occupant turns the lights off when leaving. Energy savings may coincide with peak building electrical use. Wallbox sensor (OS) controlling tire ambient lighting circuit. Wall mount sensor (OS) connected to a transformer -relay (TR) controlling all ambient lights. Design Considerations • Manual on/auto off control gives the occupant greater control of the space and may increase energy savings in rooms with daylight. Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP Control Devices • Occupancy Sensor — W allbox sensors are the most cost - effective "packages" and work well in small private offices where furnishings will not obstruct the sensor's view of the task area. Both ULT and PIR technology is available. — Ceiling or high -wall mounted sensors are less likely to be obstructed when furnishings are rearranged or added to an office. Consider ULT, PIR, or dual -mode technology. — Personal - work - station occupancy sensors work well to control task lights and other electrical loads besides the ambient lighting. Device Locations • Locate wallbox sensors on the same wall as the entrance door on the latch side of the door. • Mount ceiling sensors near the center of room over the main desk area. • Locate high -wall sensors in the comer of the room near the main doorway. Cautions: • Avoid locating the sensor behind a door or potential file cabinet locations. • For PIR sensors, avoid locations where they "view" out the door. Recommended Features • Manual On/Auto Off • Sensitivity calibration adjustment for ultrasonic sensors Recommended Settings • Set the time -out setting in the low range (8 -10 minutes). • Set the sensitivity calibration after all furnishings are in place. Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report P. 67 I i I �`I OS Wallbox sensor (OS) controlling tire ambient lighting circuit. Wall mount sensor (OS) connected to a transformer -relay (TR) controlling all ambient lights. Design Considerations • Manual on/auto off control gives the occupant greater control of the space and may increase energy savings in rooms with daylight. Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP Control Devices • Occupancy Sensor — W allbox sensors are the most cost - effective "packages" and work well in small private offices where furnishings will not obstruct the sensor's view of the task area. Both ULT and PIR technology is available. — Ceiling or high -wall mounted sensors are less likely to be obstructed when furnishings are rearranged or added to an office. Consider ULT, PIR, or dual -mode technology. — Personal - work - station occupancy sensors work well to control task lights and other electrical loads besides the ambient lighting. Device Locations • Locate wallbox sensors on the same wall as the entrance door on the latch side of the door. • Mount ceiling sensors near the center of room over the main desk area. • Locate high -wall sensors in the comer of the room near the main doorway. Cautions: • Avoid locating the sensor behind a door or potential file cabinet locations. • For PIR sensors, avoid locations where they "view" out the door. Recommended Features • Manual On/Auto Off • Sensitivity calibration adjustment for ultrasonic sensors Recommended Settings • Set the time -out setting in the low range (8 -10 minutes). • Set the sensitivity calibration after all furnishings are in place. Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report P. 67 Conference Rooms Design Pattern Savings 100 3 o so IL s0 L 40 � J 20 A LW 0 12 4 6 12 4 B 12 Time or Day Occupancy Responsive Occupancy Sensor Application and Savings Nearly all conference rooms are ideal candidates for occupancy sensor controls. Lights are often left on all day although the room may only be occupied 20-50% of the time by different users. Sensor type is determined by room area and ceiling height. Lighting energy savings range from 40 -70 %. Due to the diversity of use, lighting energy savings occur during times of both on- and off -peak building electrical use. One occupancy sensor (OS) and one transformer relay (TR) controls both the ambient lighting and wall washer lighting switch legs. Manual override switch (M connected to transformer relay (7'R). Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 Design Considerations • Control both ambient and special effect or task lighting with the occupancy sensor. • Use transformer relays (TR) to control fixtures from low- voltage sensor signals. • Provide a manual override switch to turn lights on or off for maximum AN presentation flexibility. © THE WEIDT GROUP Control Devices • Occupancy Sensor - Ultrasonic ceiling sensors or dual -mode sensors work well in medium to large conference rooms -- 350 -750 W. Dual - mode sensors reduce "false -offs" and "false -ons." - Passive infrared sensors work well in smaller spaces when the sensor has a clear line of sight to all areas of activity. - For very small conference rooms -- 100- 150 ft2 -- a wallbox device may be adequate (either PIR or ULT). Device Locations • Mount ULT sensors on the ceiling in the center of the space near wall with doors (alternate location as shown). • Locate PIR or dual -mode sensors in the comer above the door (as shown). Cautions: • Do not point PIR or dual -mode sensors out the door. Recommended Features • Manual On/ Auto Off is preferred • Sensitivity calibration adjustment for ultrasonic sensors Recommended Settings • Set time -out setting in the medium range (10-15 minutes) to reduce "false- offs." • Calibrate ULT sensors after all fumishings have been installed. Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report P. 68 Conference Rooms Design Pattern — - Savirfas - 100 o e0 o w t ao m J 20 0 0 4 8 12 4 8 12 Time of Day Manual Dimming Wallbox Dimmer Wireless Remote Dimmer -Application-and-Savings _ Manual dimming control is necessary in many conference. rooms to vary light levels for viewing AN presentations or for normal work. Wall- mounted switching devices vary from single dimmer controls to multi-scene preset control panels. In larger conference spaces, wireless remote control devices can be used to conveniently adjust light levels from any location. Lighting energy savings will depend on the primary use of the room and the availability of daylight. Manual dimming control will typically save 20-40% of lighting energy. One wall box dimmer(D) controlling the ambient lighting fixture circuit (with dimming ballasts) and one wallbox dimmer controlling all wall wash fixtures (with dimming ballasts). Design Considerations a Provide separate dimming control for ambient lighting and special wall washing or task light circuits. • Use preset control panels with three or more independently controlled light circuits. • Make sure that dimmer controls and ballasts are compatible, either from the same manufacturer or listed as•being compatible. Control Devices • Wallbox dimmer • Preset multi -scene control panel • Wireless remote dimmer — Dimming ballasts that dim down to 1 -5% provide the best control for AN task requirements. Device Locations • Some control at the doorway is necessary for conveniently turning lights on and off when entering or leaving the room. Options: • Add 3 -way wallbox dimming control close to the AN presentation area to improve accessibility and to give the potential for greater lighting energy savings. • If a wireless remote controller is used, locate the dimming controller target in an easily visible location. Recommended Features • A preset maximum light output setting accomplishes tuning • Preset multi -scene control panel Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance P. 69 July 29, 2009 ©THE W E I DT GROUP File /Storage Rooms Design Pattern Savings p 1DD o BD IL 60 i 40 J 20 D 12 4 B 12 4 0 12 Time of Day Occupancy Responsive Occupancy Sensor Application and Savings Occupancy sensor control is good for most file /storage rooms that are used infrequently and for short periods. Lights tend to be left on all day due to the diversity of users and the enclosed nature of the space. Occupancy sensor type and placement is dependent on storage height and room layout. Energy savings range from 35 -65 %. Typical sensor detection coverage zone A occupancy sensor (OS) connected to a transformer relay (TR) controlling the lights within separate lighting control zones. Xcel Energy Energy Design Assistance July 29, 2009 Design Considerations • In rooms less than 800 ft2, control all lights with a single control circuit ( one transformer relay). • Divide rooms greater than 800 ft2 into separate control zones to improve energy savings. Use multiple transformer relays. Make sure to provide 15 -20% coverage overlap (as shown). © THE WEIDT GROUP Control Devices • Occupancy Sensor — Use ultrasonic (ULT) or audible/ microphonic ceiling sensors in spaces with high shelving. — Use passive infrared (PIR) sensors in smaller filing /storage rooms where the center of the room is open and high shelving is located around the perimeter. Device Locations • Follow the manufacturer's recommendations for the specific device. Generally: • Spaces greater than 800 ft2 with aisle shelving near the ceiling will typically require more than one sensor. Recommended Features • Automatic on/off is preferred • Range and sensitivity control for ULT sensors Recommended Settings • Set time -out setting at 8 -10 minutes • Adjust ULT sensor sensitivity after furnishings are in place. Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Strategy Report P. 70 Appendix D. Daylighting Guidelines Critical elements of the daylighting system 1. Glass ■ Windows located -to- optimize- daylight ■ High performance glass 2. Electric lighting ■ Lighting type that allows dimming or switching on/off quickly ■ Circuits parallel to window /wall ■ Circuits close to windows dim/off first 3. Photo sensor and dimming /switching controls ■ For large open office areas, at least one sensor per orientation or more, depending on level of control desired • For classrooms, at least one sensor per room controlling light in room • Locate per manufacturer's recommendations • Adjustable performance settings for light level and response time • Switches lights off or dims lights to maintain desired light level 4. Solar control device such as blinds (optional) • Open when daylight available • Closure or partial closure in direct sunlight 5. Wall and ceiling finishes with high reflective values ■ Light colors to reflect daylight and reduce contract/glare at window areas 6. Furnishings should be conducive to daylighting • Low furnishing heights to allow deep daylight penetration • Light colored surfaces for maximum reflectance of daylight Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Xcel Energy Strategy Report Energy Design Assistance P. 71 July 29, 2009 ©THE WEIDT GROUP Implementation Guidelines 7. Construction documents sufficient to define daylighting system • Intent of daylighting system • Identify required system components • Performance requirements • Define lighting level minimum thresholds • Electric light and control circuitry, linking auto controls with sensors and circuits 8. Construction documents that clearly define the contractor's responsibilities ■ Provide a system that functions as expected ■ Install equipment according to manufacturer's instructions ■ Calibrate sensors to specified performance using light meter ■ Document calibration for each daylit space • fc electric lighting with no daylight fc electric lighting begins to dim or shut off • fc electric lighting reaches minimum output • fc electric lighting minimum output ■ Document glazing performance characteristics from manufacturer ■ Instructions for owner /maintenance staff ■ written maintenance issues ■ written re- calibration process, suggested timetable • on -site demonstration of calibration process Xcel tnergy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Strategy Report July 29, 2009 © THE WEIDT GROUP P 72 Energy Design Assistance 7 Xcel Energym ---ENERGY ANALYSIS -- - - - -- - - - - for the Edina Public Works Facility Edina, MN BUNDLE REPORT second of three reports September 3, 2009 7226.40 THE WEIDT GROUP- V SSDD BAKER -DAD, SUITE 11313 MINK ETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 //TEL 952.938.1 5SB FAX 952.93B.14BO TWGI.CDM Table of Contents Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 3 The Analysis ----------------------------------------.----..4 BundleResults ...................................................................................................................................... 6 . ............ /n- � Verification................ -----------------_—.---------.-----------.11 AppendixA. ________.__.___-----------------_--..l2 Appendix B. Detailed Bundle Results ............................................................................................... l3 Appendix C. Detailed Strategy Results ............................................................................................... l4 Appendix D. Bundle Lighting Power ................................................................................................ l9 Appendix E. Verification Flowchart .................................................................................................. 20 Appendix F. Sample Measurement and Verification Plan ................................................................. 2l Appendix G. Key Strategy Documentation Guidelines ..................................................................... 22 -----���� Edina Public Works Edina, Mm Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report �� �� September 3, 2009 @ THE vvE/orr.eoup p.1 Project Participants Design Team Owner.....................................:.. ............................... ............:..............City of Edina Wayne Houle Architect .............................................................. ..........................Oertel Architects Eric Werner Jeff Oertel Ron Betcher Mechanical/ Electrical Engineer ....... ........................Paulson & Clark Engineering Robert Lowe Dan Paulson Andrew Tripp Energy Design Assistance Team Electric Utility .................. :................................................................... Xcel Energy Jennifer Abbott Jenny K. Wagner Energy Design Assistance Consultant ............. ............................ The Weidt Group Kris Leaf Vinay Ghatti Lauren Huynh Verification Consultant ................................. ............................... The Weidt Group Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 2 Introduction This document is the second: of three formal reports provided under the Energy Design Assistance program of Xcel Energy. It summarizes bundled strategy results based on final DOE -2, simulations of the bundles selected in the July 29, 2009 Strategy Results Meeting. This report also discusses the proposed Xcel Energy incentives and the next steps in the process. For further information about the process, model assumptions; and strategy results, please refer to the Strategy Report dated July 29„ 2009. This represents.the,'end of the design stage component of Energy Design Assistance. Following review of this report, the`Ownei/D.esign Team will select a'bundle -for implementation and the Verification process will begin. The process follows a clear methodology of information gathering, collaboration, and analysis in an integrated setting of three formal meetings. The Owner, Architect, engineers, cost estimators, utility representatives, and The Weidt Group work together to understand how the building will use energy and where cost effective savings can be realized, through design. These are the steps, with the current stage shown in bold: 1. Introductory meeting ■ Program overview - ■ Review building design ■ Review strategies for modeling 2. Phase 1 analysis ■ Computer modeling of Code Base and strategies.by The Weidt Group ■ Cost analysis. by the Design Team 3. Strategy results meeting ■ Review of individual strategy results ■ . Selection of bundles of strategies 4. Phase 2 analysis • Bundle energy analysis by The Weidt Group • Further cost analysis by the Design Team (if needed) 5. Bundle results meeting ■ Review of bundle results F ■ Review of program incentives ■ Introduction to verification 6. Verification • Bundle selection ■ Construction document review • On -site verification of strategies Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance d Bundle Report P. 3 September 3; 2009 © THE W E 1 DT G R D U P The Analysis Changes to the Model The following changes were made to the model as a result of discussions during the Strategy Meeting, as well as further discussion with the Design Team following the meeting. • The sensible and total heat recovery strategies were modeled. • Stepped and dimming daylighting strategies with Solatubes were modeled in shops. Bundle Modeling Upon review of the results of the isolated strategy analysis, the Design Team created four bundles of strategies for final modeling. Bundle 1 is the minimum budget building; Bundle 2 is generally the desired building, given the budget; Bundle 3 is a better building with reasonable payback for conservation strategies; and Bundle 4 illustrates the maximum opportunity for savings regardless of payback. ■ Bundle 1 includes a number of strategies that improve the building beyond a code level. ■ VE -85 #2 (Unit U- Factor 0.44, COG U- Factor 0.3 1, SHGC 0.54, Visible Trans. 0.76) ■ Upgrade to R -16 wall assembly at both office and vehicle storage areas • Upgrade to R -24 roof assembly ■ Stepped daylighting control of electric lights in vehicle storage, locker rooms and shops, controlling electric lights in total area of about 28,000 sf. ■ Occupancy sensor control of lights in private office (1,013 sf), open office (2,749 sf), conference (761 sf), storage (1,424 sf) and restroom (484 sf) ■ Open office direct/indirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf (2,749 sf) ■ Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf (1,013 sf) ■ Conference direct/indirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf (761 sf) ■ Wash bay; 0.20 W /sf (3,808 sf) ■ Storage; 0.68 W /sf (1,424 sf) ■ Corridor; 0.43 W /sf (6,999 sf) ■ Restroom; 0.77 W /sf (484 sf) ■ Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf (99,370 sf) ■ Shop; 1.19 W /sf (4,690 sf) ■ Water to water heat pump with ground loop(14 EER, 2.5 COP) ■ Upgrade to premium efficiency supply return fans ■ Upgrade to premium efficiency pump motors Bundle 2 adds or modifies the following strategies. ■ Upgrade to R -20 wall assembly at vehicle storage areas ■ Upgrade to R -30 roof assembly ■ Occupancy sensor control of lights in vehicle storage (99,370 sf), wash bay (3,808 sf) and shop (4,690 sf) ■ Dual level switching of lights for conference (761 sf) and vehicle maintenance (17,891 sf) ■ CO2 control of outside air at offices ■ Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans ■ Sensible heat recovery (vehicle maintenance) ■ Total heat recovery system at offices (70% sensible and latent), gathers at least 90% of the building exhaust air volume. ■ Bundle 3 adds or modifies the following strategies, compared to Bundle 2. ■ Upgrade to R -20 wall assembly at offices ■ Dimming daylighting control of electric lights in open office, dining and shops controlling electric lights in total area of about 10,400 sf ■ Occupancy sensor control of lights in vehicle maintenance (17,891 sf) Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P 4 • Manual dimming of lights in conference (761 sf) • Dual level switching of lights for open office (2,749 sf) ■ Bundle 4 adds or modifies the following strategies, compared to Bundle 3. ■ Upgrade to R-40 roof assembly ■ Occupancy sensor control of lights in corridor (6,999 sf) ► Dual level switching of lights for wash bay (3,808 sf) and shop (4,690 sf) - -- - - Private office direct system, 30 -fc, std -T8,_ 0.50-W /sf (1,013 sf af0.50 -W /sf) ■ Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 W /sf (3,808 sf at 0.12 W /sf) Please see the previous Strategy Report (dated July 29, 2009), which provides additional information associated with each of these strategies. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 5 Bundle Results The simulation results for the bundles are shown below. Figure 1 shows that the bundles are projected to save between $51,940 and $97,378 per year beyond the Code base energy use. The bundles show substantial savings in most categories. More detailed results can be found in Appendix B. Detailed Bundle Results. Figure 1 Annual Energy Costs for Bundles by End Use Code Base Bundle 1 Bundle 2 Bundle 3 Bundle 4 ■Heating ❑Cooling ❑Fan /pump ❑Lights ■Equip. ❑DHW Total 18 V _W W Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 ©THE W E I DT G Ro u P p 6 Figures 2 and 3 show electric peak and consumption savings respectively. Figure 4 shows the annual total energy use. The peak M values and annual energy use values are especially important because they are the primary basis for the incentives from Xcel Energy. Figure 2 Annual Electrical Peak, KW Code Base Bundle 1 109 Bundle 2 156 Bundle 3 164 Bundle 4 164 0% 20% 40% 60% Figure 3 Annual Electric Use, KWH Code Base Bundle 1 Bundle 2 Bundle 3 Bundle 4 0% 20% 40% 60% Figure 4 Annual Total Energy Use, BTU x 106 (includes both gas and electric) Code Base Bundle 1 Bundle 2 Bundle 3 Bundle 4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 80% 100% 80% 100% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT G RD u P P. 7 Bundle Composition and Strategy Paybacks In order to make informed design choices based on energy use, it is important to weigh the cost of design options against the potential for energy savings. One useful gauge of first cost versus annual savings is the simple payback, which is the ratio of first cost to annual savings. This represents the number of years required for the energy savings to pay for the improvements. The Design Team assembled incremental construction costs for all strategies considered in the bundle analysis. The costs and paybacks for isolated strategies are listed below. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 8 j Annual Savings MIN MAX Peak Energy - Construct Payback Bundle Bundle Bundle No. Strete Descrugon Insulation 1 Envelope KW E . - Cost Years EWC00 Code wall assembly 0 $0 $0 Ne EWC01 R -16 wall assembly (offices) 2 $2,945 $11,717 4.0 - EW CO2 R -20 wall assembly (offices) 4 $3,921 $19,040 4.9 EWC03 R -16 wall assembly (veh. Storage) 0 $1,243 $39,680 31.9 EWC04 R -20 all assembly (veh. Storage) 2 $1,655 .$64,48D 39.D ERC00 Code roof assembly 0 $0 $0 Na ERC01 R -24 roof assembly 0 5299 $9,130 30.5 ERCO2 R -30 roof assembly 0 $2,280 $87,390 38.3 ERG03 R -40 roof assembly 2 Window Glazing Strategies 0 $3,483 $348,256 10D.0 W3101 Cc 9: to 10 %wiNwdll ratio 0 $0 $0 rue W0601 Lo E clear 1/ alum frame - 0 $1,511 $0 Imm W0901 Lo E tint 1/ alum frame 0 21264 $3,225 2.6 W1201 Lo E dear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame -2 $1,373 - $8,063 5.9 W1301 Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame 0 $1,122 $8,870 - 7.9 - W5101 VE -8582 Daylighting Control Strategies -1 $1,339 3 6,451 4.9 - - D3101 Stopped daylightng control at veh D3101 81ock rms. 0 $656 $250 0.4 D3102 Dimming daylighting control at open office 8 dining -3 $554 $2,460 4.4 D3103 Stepped d fin control at shops 0 269 Na Na 03104 Dimming daylighting control at shops aylig 0 - $247 Ne Na 4 Lighting Control Strategies LCP01 Private office oocupancy sensor control 0 $82 $301 3.7 _ LCP04 Private office dual level occupancy sensor control 0 $105 $392 3.1 once dual level switching LCO01 0 $54 $385 - 7.1. Open LC001 Open office occupancy sensor control 0 $91 $550 6.0 LC004 Open office dual level switching 0 $66 $473 7.2 _ - LCCNt Conference occupancy sensor control 0 $16 $150 9.4 LCCN4 Conference dual level switching 0 $11 $232 21.1 LCCN5 Conference manual dimming 0 $14 $649 46.4 LC 1 Storage occupancy sensor control 0 $ $5110 29. - _ LCCI CI1 Corridor occupancy sensor control 0 $1D ID $1,312 131.2 2 LCRR1 Restroom occupancy sensor control 0 $38 $150 3.9 - LCGA1 Vahlcle storage occupancy sensor control -1 $659 $19,874 30.2 _ LCMH7 Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control 72 $549 $3,578 6.5 - LCMH4 Vehicle maintenance dual level switching 4 $219 $2,154 9.8 LCWHt Wash bay occupancy sensor control 0 $80 $1,015. 12.7 - - LCWH4 Wash bay dual level switching 0 $47 $458 9.8 LCSH1 Shop occupancy sensor control 0 $87 $1251 14.4 _ LCSH4 Shop dual level switching 0 $90 $1,182 13.1 - Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 8 Bundle Composition and Strategy Paybacks (continued) No. Strategy Description 5 Lighting Design LO Code Open office lighting @ 1.45 Wsf Annual Savings Peak Energy KW $ 0 SO Construct Cost I So MIN MAX Payback Bundle Bundle Years Na L0200 Open offiee direct system at 50 le. 0.95 W /sf 0 $234 ($1,351) Imm L0300 Open office Indirect system at 50 fc. 1.15 Wlef 0 $146 $4,040 271 L0400 Open office task (0.3 W/sf) ambient at 30 fe, 0.65 Wlsf 0 $233 ($1.960) Imm L0500 Open office direcHlndirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 Wlsf 0 $252 $2,890 11.5 LOCPO Code Private office lighting @ 1.45 Wsf 0 $0 $D Na L01PO Private office direct system, 55 fe, std T8, 1.00 W /sf 0 $102 ($426) imm L02PO Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /Sf 0 $196 ($1.143) Imm L03PO Private office directfindirect system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 Wlsf 0 $102 $1,052 10.3 L04PO Private office direct/Indirect system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W/sf 0 $196 ($235) Imm L05PO Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std TS ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 Wlsf 0 $129 ($1209) Imm LOCCN Code Conference lighting @ 1.3 Wsf 0 $O $0 We L02CN Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf 0 $9 ($14) Imm L03CN Conference Indirect system at 50 fe , 135 W /sl 0 ($3) $1,701 Na L04CN Conference directlindirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W/sf 0 511 $1,433 130.3 LOCWH Code Wash bay lighting @ 0.7 Wei 0 $0 $0 rue L02WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fodure spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 Wlsf 0 $45 $908 202 L03WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8-foot T8 fbdure spaced 25 fL o.c., 0.30 W /sf 0 $164 ($1.233) Imm L04WH Wash bay 1 -lamp, &foot TO future spaced 37 ft. o.c., 0.20 Wlsf -7 $107 (S1.947) imm L05W H Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8-foot TB figure spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 Wlsf -7 $131 (S2.516) imm LDCMH Code Vehicle maintenance lighting @ 0.7 Wsf D $0 $0 We L05MH Vehicle maintenance lighting design @, 8.53 W /sf 10 $815 $1,818 2.4 LOCST Code Storage lighting @ 0.8 Wsf 0 $0 $0 Na LOCST Storage; 0.68 Wlsf 0 $9 (S72) imm LOCCI Code Corridor lighting @ 0.5 Wsf 0 $0 $0 Na LO1CI Corridor, 0.43 W /sf D $32 (5772) LOCRR Code Resnoom lighting @ 0.9 Wsf 0 SO $0 imm - Na LD1RR Restroom; D.77 W /sf 0 $14 (S24) Imm LOCGA Code Vehicle storage lighting @ 0.2 Wsf 0 $0 $0 Na LD1GA Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf 1 $1,025 ($1.259) Imm LOCSH Code Shop lighting @ 1.4 Wsf 0 $0 $0 We L01SH Shop; 1.19 W /sf 0 $90 (S416) Imm 6 Lighting LTE01 Super Tcient lamps Technology LTE02 Extra efficient ballasts - 8 1 51,991 -5566 Na rda Ne rye 7 HVAC Efficiency Strategies MAC01 Water to water heat pump 8 Fan and Pump Strategies MNIT03 Premiu elfictenay supply/retum tan-motors MN1T04 Premim um efficiency pump motors 9 Conditioning of Outside Air Strategies MOA02 CO2 control of outside air - 52 -6 0 12 $41,215 $599 $39 $5,775 Ne Na We - - We MOA22 Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans BO $42,438 Na Na MHRSt Sensible heat recovery (vehicle manitenance) MHRT1 Total heat recovery (offices) 0 8 $435 $8,520 Na rue Na We Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 9 Xcel Energy Incentive Xcel Energy promotes the implementation of cost effective bundles of strategies by proposing cash incentives to reduce the added cost of implementing the selected energy conserving strategies. The bundles discussed on the previous pages were selected by the designers to cover a range of scenarios so that one of these bundles would be a likely candidate for implementation in the final building. Xcel Energy is offering Incentives as follows for the bundles. Bundle 1: $32,700 Bundle 2: $47,400 Bundle 3: $49,200 .Bundle 4: $49,200 The incentive offers listed above make the presumption that the selected bundle will be implemented in its entirety. Any changes from the specifications of the selected bundle should be reported to Xcel Energy. If it is deemed that these changes would have a significant impact on energy, then Xcel Energy will make adjustments to the incentives accordingly. Bundle Payback Analysis The Xcel Energy incentive will reduce the paybacks for each of the bundles, as shown in the table below. Note: Subject to the following qualifications, the Energy Design Assistance computer model offers sophisticated predictions of energy savings with estimations as good as any other means available for a building that has not been built. The strategy and bundle results compare relative differences in net energy use for design alternatives. The results are not appropriate for system design and /or equipment selection; these are responsibilities of the registered design professionals of record. The actual energy use of this building will be different f rom simulated results. Building systems and other operating parameters provided by the Design Team and modeled through Energy Design Assistance approximate actual conditions, but differences in weather, operating parameters, occupancy level, and changes that occur through the bidding and construction process will result in annual energy costs that will be different from what is predicted here. However, when a bundle of strategies is selected relative to other alternatives, its energy (and dollar) conserving value can be expected to remain constant relative to the other alternatives, and the magnitude of the cost should be approximately as predicted. Thus, implementation of a bundle of strategies offers the opportunity for energy savings, but the realization of those savings is the responsibility of the owner /operator of the building- not Xcel Energy or The Weidt Group. Savings are not guaranteed. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 10 Incremental Energy $ Payback Adjusted Payback Construction Savings vs. Before Incentive Construction After Cost Code Base Incentive $ Incentive Bundle 1 $68,886 $51,940 1.3 $32,700 $36,186 0.7 Bundle 2 $179,086 $94,667 1.9 $47,400 $131,686 1.4 Bundle 3 $210,814 $96,227 2.2 $49,200 $161,614 1.7 Bundle 4 $473,345 $97,378 4.9 $49,200 $424,145 4.4 Note: Subject to the following qualifications, the Energy Design Assistance computer model offers sophisticated predictions of energy savings with estimations as good as any other means available for a building that has not been built. The strategy and bundle results compare relative differences in net energy use for design alternatives. The results are not appropriate for system design and /or equipment selection; these are responsibilities of the registered design professionals of record. The actual energy use of this building will be different f rom simulated results. Building systems and other operating parameters provided by the Design Team and modeled through Energy Design Assistance approximate actual conditions, but differences in weather, operating parameters, occupancy level, and changes that occur through the bidding and construction process will result in annual energy costs that will be different from what is predicted here. However, when a bundle of strategies is selected relative to other alternatives, its energy (and dollar) conserving value can be expected to remain constant relative to the other alternatives, and the magnitude of the cost should be approximately as predicted. Thus, implementation of a bundle of strategies offers the opportunity for energy savings, but the realization of those savings is the responsibility of the owner /operator of the building- not Xcel Energy or The Weidt Group. Savings are not guaranteed. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 10 Verification This marks the end of the Design Assistance portion of Energy Design Assistance. The next stage will be Verification/Validation, a process that seeks to assure that one of the bundles is implemented and working properly. The Weidt Group will work with the Design Team until the building is constructed and occupied, serving as a resource to verify that the accepted measures are installed. The process will be laid out in detail in the coming weeks, but it will generally include the following. • Design Team provides written notification to Xcel Energy of acceptance of one bundle as defined in this report • Execution of rider to Xcel Energy contract defining remaining responsibilities and procedures • Construction document review by The Weidt Group • Field observation of installed strategies as the building is completed and occupied • Report by The Weidt Group as to status of strategy implementation • Xcel Energy provides incentive payment The Verification/Validation process, while not exhaustive by any means, is designed to assist the Owner in knowing whether or not the strategies are working as expected. If strategies are not working, notification is given so that corrections can be made. If some of the chosen strategies are not implemented within the Owner's selected bundle, Xcel Energy may choose to adjust the incentive amount. Please see Appendix E. Verification Flowchart for more details. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 11 Appendix A. Building Summary Building Summary Building type Office / vehicle storage & maintenance Location Edina, Minnesota Building area 144,776 sq ft Garage area 90,400 Number of stories 1 Building organization Perimeter offices with vehicle storage/ maintenance in the center Windows Window to floor area ratio: 2.2 %; Window to wall area ratio: 7.4% Lighting system(s) The design includes daylighting stepped controls, dual level switches, occupancy sensors, and T5s into the layout of the space. HVAC system(s) GSHP - central water to water heat pump High efficiency condensing boiler back up and rooftop units with coils at offices Areas heated All Areas cooled Office, veh maintenance, shops Electric utility Xcel Energy Gas utility Gas Util Approx. construction document completion date Approx. construction start Jul -09 Approx. occupancy date Apr -10 Other notes Additional insulation to roof and new skylights in the offices Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT B R O U P P. 12 Appendix B. Detailed Bundle Results Fnarnv Cnctc Annual Energy by End Use Itemized KBtu /sf CL E 3 Totals w N 3 Y rn Annual Energy 16 Itemized Costs d > Totals per sq. ft Totals for Building d9 69 a E N ~ H N N ` 0 .0 J W C C 7 O. N Code Base 19.2 2.6 24.4 0.6 N 17.7 (0 N O O C w M _ L7 tr O O C> C M in e N C C> C f0 17.7 2 0 U. E» O J Lu H Q cn 8.0 W Q (A Code Base $.362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 1.5 8.0 $207,313 4.2 Bundle 1 $.142 $.029 $.432 $.006 $.093 $.371 $1.07 $0.36 25.1% $155,373 $51,940 Bundle 2 $.103 $.033 $.170 $.006 $.096 $.371 $.78 $0.65 45.7% $112,646 $94,667 Bundle 3 $.101 $.032 $.169 $.006 $.088 $.371 $.77 $0.66 46.4% $111,086 $96,227 Bundle 4 1 $.100 $.032 $.169 $.006 $.082 $.371 1 $.76 $0.67 47.0%1 $109,935 $97,378 Annual Energy by End Use Itemized KBtu /sf CL E 3 Totals w N 3 Y rn Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 13 Annual Energy 16 Z d > w L a C H H 2 0 u- 0 .0 J W N (n N Code Base 19.2 2.6 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 N 70.67 Bundle 1 9.4 1.6 23.7 0.6 4.8 17.7 O (0 57.76 18% 10,231 Bundle 2 5.1 1.5 8.0 0.6 4.6 17.7 Bundle 1 37.47 47% 18% 2,252,889 Bundle 3 5.0 1.5 8.0 0.6 4.2 17.7 4,807 37.03 48% 1,253,383 45% Bundle 4 4.9 1.5 8.0 0.6 3.9 17.7 1,528,853 36.54 48% 145 530 Peak Conditions Bundle 4 5,290 4,941 48% 1 1,508,090 1,292,730 46% 1 145 530 79% Peak Electric Gas Cooling Heating N C N � N � \ o N d \ o d N > f0 N fD = Y N N O) C C N 01 C N y �= C D N m C N LN (/� C Y > H- N C a> C o 0 0 O > N C N 3 m t- d m > N C N 3 Y o M N m o rn ale o �p e N O� O N c.) M w O O a- "0 2Y (0 cn O O av Code Base 3.3 473 4,510 1,224 118 5,498 Bundle 1 2.5 364 109 23% 4,510 0% 1,582 92 27 23% 5,399 99 2% Bundle 2 2.2 315 158 33% 3,430 24% 1,731 84 35 29% 4,012 1,486 27% Bundle 31 2.1 309 164 .35% 3,430 24% 1,733 84 35 29% 4,008 1,490 27% Bundle 41 2.1 309 164 35% 1 3,430 24% 1 1,733 84 35 29% 3,981 1,518 28% Anneal Fnerav by Fuel Source Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 13 Annual Energy Annual Electric Annual Gas U H H m N C N C N N H N > M _ C N 2 V C :... _ > @ (li CO \o o l>0 -CO V1 V± 0 O O (0 N o CO Code Base 10,231 2,800,820 675 Bundle 1 8,362 1,869 18% 2,252,889 547,931 20% 675 0 0% Bundle 2 5,425 4,807 47% 1,547,437 1,253,383 45% 145 530 79% Bundle 3 5,361 4,870 48% 1,528,853 1,271,967 45% 145 530 79% Bundle 4 5,290 4,941 48% 1 1,508,090 1,292,730 46% 1 145 530 79% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 13 Appendix C. Detailed Strategy Results Energy Costs 144,776 SQ FT. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 14 Itemized Costs Totals per bidg s . ft Totals for Bulldin a C Strategy 2 U li O J �,T Q N Code Base; CODE1 $.362 COOS $.511 $.006 $.127 $371 $1.43 b207 13 R -16 wall assembly (offices); EWC01 $.343 5.056 5.510 $.006 5.127 E.371 $1.41 $0.02 1.4% $204,368 52,945 R -20 wall assembly (olfices); EWCO2 $.337 $.056 5.508 S.DOB $.127 $.371 57.40 $0.03 1.9% $203,392 $3,921 R -16 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC03 $.354 5.056 $.510 $.006 $.127 $.371 57.42 $0.01 0.6% $206,070 $1,243 R -20 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC04 $351 $.056 $.510 $.008 5.127 5371 $1.42 $0.01 0.8% $205,658 $1,655 R -24 roof assembly; ERC01 $.360 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 MOD 0.1% $207,014 $299 R -30 roof assembly; ERCO2 $.349 $.055 S.609 $.008 $.127 $.371 $1.42 $0.02 1.1 % $205,033 $2,280 RAO roof assembly, ERC03 $341 $.055 $.509 $.006 $127 5.371 $1.41 $0.02 1.7% $203,830 $3,483 Lo E dear 1/ alum frame; W0601 $.351 $.057 $.511 $.006 $127 $371 $1.42 $0.01 0.7% $205,802 $1,511 Lo E tint 1/ alum frame; W0901 $355 $.055 $.51D 5.006 $.127 $371 $1.42 $0.01 0.6% $206,049 $1,264 Lo E clear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1201 $.355 $.054 $.510 $.OD6 $.127 $371 $1.42 $0.01 0.7% $205,940 $1,373 Lo E Om, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1301 5.357 $.054 $.509 $.OD6 $.127 $371 $1.42 $0.01 0.5% 5206,191 $1,122 VE- 85512; W5101 5.352 $.056 5.511 $.OD6 $.127 $371 57.42 $0.01 0.6% $205,974 $1,339 Stepped daylightng control at veh. Stor & lock ems.; D3101 $362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $123 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.3% $206,657 $656 Dimming daylighting control at open office & dining; D3102 $.364 $.054 $.512 $.OD6 $.121 5.371 S1A3 $0.00 0.3% $206,759 $554 Stepped daylightng control at shops; D3103 $362 5.055 $.571 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1 A3 $0.00 0.0% $207,244 $69 Dimming daylighting control at shops; 03704 $.364 $.054 $.512 $.006 $.123 $.371 $1.43 MOD 0.1% $207,066 5247 Private cities occupancy sensor control; LCPOt $362 $.055 $.511 $.DO6 $126 $.371 $1.43 MOD 0.0% $207,231 $82 Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 $362 $.055 $.511 S.OD8 $128 5.371 $1.43 MOD 0.1% $207,208 $105 Private office dual level switching; LCP04 5.362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $127 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,259 $54 Open once occupancy sensor control; LCO01 $363 $.055 $.512 $.006 $125 5.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,222 $91 Open office dual level sMching; LCO04 $362 $.055 $.511 5.006 $126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0,0% $207,247 $66 Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCN7 $362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% 5207,297 $16 Conference dual level switching; LCCN4 $362 5.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $371 611A3 $0.00 0.0% $207,302 $11 Conference manual dimming; LCCNS 5.362 5.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $7.43 $0.00 0.0% 5207,299 $14 Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST7 $362 COSS $.511 $.DOB $126 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,296 $17 Mech/elec occupancy sensor control; LCME1 5.362 COOS $.511 $.006 $127 $377 51.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,313 $0 Corridor occupancy sensor control; LCCI1 $.362 COSS $.511 $.006 $127 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,303 S10 Restroom occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 5.362 $255 $.511 $.DD6 $.127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,275 $38 Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGA1 $362 $.D55 $.511 $.DOS $.123 5.371 $1.43 $O.OD 0.3% 5206,654 $659 Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMH1 $365 5.054 $.511 $.006 $.121 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.3% $206,764 $549 Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 $365 $.054 $.512 $.006 $122 $371 $1.43 $O.OD 0.1% $207,094 $210 Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH1 $.363 $.055 $.512 $.006 $125 5.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,233 $80 Wash bay dual level svAtrhing; LCWH4 $363 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $O.OD 0.0% $207,266 $47 Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSH1 $.363 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.125 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,226 $87 Shop dual level switching; LCSH4 5.363 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,223 $90 Open office direct system at 50 to, 0.85 Met; L0200 $363 5.054 $.512 $.DOS $124 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,079 $234 Open office Indirect system at 50 fc. 1.15 Met L0300 $.363 $.055 $.512 $.006 $.125 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,167 $146 Open office task (0.3 Mat) emblem at 3D fc, 0.65 Met; L0400 $363 $.054 $.512 $.006 $.124 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,080 5233 Open office directlindinect system at 40 fc, 0.90 Mat,, LOSOO $363 $.054 $.512 $.006 $124 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,061 $2S2 Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf; L01PO $362 5.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,211 $102 Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf; L02PO 5363 5.055 $.511 $.006 $.125 $377 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,117 $196 Private office direct indirect system, 50 fc, slid T8, 1.00 Wlsf; L03PO $.362 5.055 5.511 $.DOS $128 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,211 $102 Private office direct/indirect system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf; LD4PO 5.363 $.055 $.511 $.DO6 $.125 5.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,117 $196 Private office task @ 0.3 Met, std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 Mat; LOSPO $362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,184 $129 Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 Mist, L02CN $.362 $.055 $.511 S.OD6 $.127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,3D4 S9 Conference Indirect system at SD fc , 1.35 W /sf; L03CN $.362 $.055 $.511 $.DOB $.127 $.371 $1.43 (90.00) 0.0% $207,316 (S3) Conference direct/Indirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf; LD4CN $.362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,302 $11 Wash bay 14amp, B -foot TO fixture spaced 12 fL o.c., 0.60 W /sf; L02WH $.363 $.055 $.511 $.006 5.126 $.371 $IA3 $0.00 0.0% $207,268 $45 Wash bay 14amp, 6 -foot TO fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 Mt., L03WH $364 $.055 $.512 $.006 $.123 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,149 $164 Wash bay 14amp, &toot T8 fixture spaced 37 R. o.c., 0.20 Wleh, L04WH $365 $.055 $.512 $.006 $.122 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,206 $107 Wash bay 14amp, 8 -foot TO fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 W1yf; LOSWH $365 5.055 $.512 $.006 $122 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.1% $207,182 $131 Vehicle maintenance lighting design @. 0.53 Mist; LOSMH $.366 $.054 $.511 $.006 $.119 $371 $1.43 $0.01 0.4% $206,498 $815 Storage; 0.68 W /sf; L01ST $362 COOS $.511 $.006 $.127 S.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,304 $9 Mech/elec; 1.28 W /&,, L01ME S.362 5.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 MOD 0.0% $207,313 SO Corridor, 0.43 Wlst L01 Cl S.363 COOS 5.511 $.006 $.126 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,287 932 Restroom; 0.77 W /sh, L01RR $.362 $.055 $.511 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,299 $14 Vehicle storage; 0.17 Wlst; L01GA $362 $.055 $.512 $.006 $.118 $.371 $1.42 $0.01 0.5% $206,288 $1,025 Shop; 1.19 Mat. LO1SH $.363 5.055 $.511 $.006 $126 $371 $1 A3 $0.00 0.0% $207,223 $90 Super T-8 lamps; LTE01 $368 $.053 $.512 $.006 $.106 $371 $1.42 $0.01 1.0% $205,322 $1,991 Eidra efficient ballasts; LTE02 $364 $.055 $.512 5.006 $.121 $371 $1A3 $O.OD 0.3% 5206,747 SS66 Water to wafer heal pump; MAC01 $156 $.037 $,450 $.DO6 $127 $371 $1.15 $028 19.9% $166,098 $41,215 Ground heat pump, Alternate 1; MGHD7 $167 $.042 5.438 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.15 $0.28 19.6% $166,597 $40,716 Premium efficiency supply /return fan motors; MMT03 $.364 5.055 $.506 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.43 $0.00 0.3% $208,714 $599 Premium efficiency pump motors; MMT04 $362 SASS $.511 $.006 $.127 $371 $1.43 $0.00 0.0% $207,274 $39 CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 $.331 $.054 $.SD4 $.DDS $.127 $371 $139 $0.04 2.8% $201,538 $5,775 Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans; MOA22 $367 $.063 $.205 $.006 $.127 $.371 $1.14 $0.29 20.5% $164,875 $42,438 Sensible heat recovery (vehlcle manBenance5 MHRS1 i..11 55 $.037 $449 $.008 $.127 $371 - ;67.14 $0.00 , 0.3% $165,663 $435 Total heat recovery Iciness); MHRT1 5.313 $.053 $.504 $.006 $127 $.371 $1.37 $0.06 4.1% 5198,793 $8,520 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 14 Edina Public Works Facility Annual Energy by End Use 144 779 SO FT Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 @ THE W E l DT G R D u P P. 15 Itemized KBtu /sf Totals CL 7 N d y G W 3 C 0, O m 159 Strategy S U LL LL O J W kU Code Base; CODE1 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 R -16 wall assembly (offices); EWC01 18.3 2.656 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 69.69 1.4% R -20 wall assembly (offices); EWCO2 18.1 2.668 24.3 0.6 61 17.7 69.41 1.8% R -16 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC03 18.8 2.665 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.22 0.6% R -20 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC04 18.7 2.675 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.09 0.8% R -24 roof assemby; ER001 19.2 2.628 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.58 0.1% R -30 roof assembly; ERCO2 18.7 2.626 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.06 0.9% R-40 roof assembly; ERC03 18.2 2.624 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 69.58 1.5% Lo E dear 1/ alum frame; W0601 18.7 2.709 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.17 0.7% Lo E Ent 1/ alum frame; W0901 19.0 2.614 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.34 0.5% Lo E dear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1201 18.9 2.607 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.30 0.5% Lo E tint, high visible transmlttance/ alum frame; W1301 19.1 2.577 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.40 0.4% VE -85#2; W5101 18.8 2.675 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.20 0.7% Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor & lock rms.; D3101 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.47. 0.3% Dimming daylighting control at open office & dining; D3102 19.3 2.568 24.4 0.6 5.8 17.7 70.37 0.4% Stepped daylighting control at shops; D3103 19.2 2.623 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.63 0.1% Dimming dayfighting control at shops; D3104 19.3 2.600 24.4 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.53 0.2% Private office occupancy sensor control; LCPO1 19.2 2.621 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.63 0.1% Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 19.2 2.617 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.62 0.1% Private office dual level switching; LCP04 19.2 2.624 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.65 0.0% Open office occupancy sensor control; LC001 19.3 2.616 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.61 0.1% Open office dual level switching; LC004 19.3 2.621 24.4 0.6 . 6.0 17.7 70.64 0.0% Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCN1 19.3 2.628 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.66 0.0% Conference dual level switching; LCCN4 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Conference manual dimming; LCCNS 19.3 2.626 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST1 19.3 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.67 0.0% Mechlelec occupancy sensor control; LCME1 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Corridor occupancy sensor control; LCCI1 19.3 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Restroom occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 19.2 2.625 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.65 0.0% Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGA1 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.48 0.3% Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMH1 19.4 2.586 24.5 0.6 5.6 17.7 70.49 0.3% Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 19.4 2.589 24.5 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.53 0.2% Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH1 19.3 2.631 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.62 0.1% Wash bay dual level switching; LCWH4 19.3 2.630 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.65 0.0% Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSH1 19.3 2.616 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.62 0.1% Shop dual level switching; LCSH4 19.3 2.621 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.63 0.1% Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.95 W /sf; L02O0 19.3 2.602 24.4 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.55 0.2% Open office indirect system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf; L0300 19.3 2.612 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.59 0.1% Open office task (0.3 W /sf) ambient at 30 fc, 0.65 W /sf; L04O0 19.3 2.602 24.4 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.55 0.2% Open office directlndirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf; L05O0 19.3 2.600 24.4 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.54 0.2% Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf; L01P0 192 2.620 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.62 0.1% Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf; L02P0 19.3 2.609 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.58 0.1% Private office directfindirec system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf; L03P0 19.2 2.620 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.62 0.1% Private office direct/indirect system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf; L04P0 19.3 2.609 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.58 0.1% Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 W /sf; L05P0 19.3 2.616 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.61 0.1% Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf, L02CN 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Conference indirect system at 50 fc , 1.35 W /sf; L03CN 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Conference directtindirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf; L04CN 19.3 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Wash bay 14amp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 W /sf; L02WH 19.3 2.630 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.65 0.0% Wash bay 14amp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 25 fl. o.c., 0.30 W /sf; L03WH 19.3 2.631 24.5 0.6 5.9 17.7 70.58 0.1% Wash bay 14amp, 8-foot T8 fixture spaced 37 ft. o.c., 0.20 W /sf; L04WH 19.4 2.631 24.5 0.6 5.8 17.7 70.56 0.2% Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -toot T8 fixture spaced 60 fl. o.c., 0.12 W /sf; L05WH 19.4 2.632 24.5 0.6 5.8 17.7 70.55 0.2% Vehicle maintenance lighting design @, 0.53 W /sf; L05MH 19.4 2.564 24.5 0.6 5.7 17.7 70.45 0.3% Storage; 0.68 W /sf; L01 ST 19.3 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.0% Mech/elec; 1.28 W /sf; L01ME 19.2 2.629 24A 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.67 0.01/6 Corridor, 0.43 W /sf•, L.01 C1 19.3 2.628 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.66 0.0% Restroom; 077 W /sf; L01RR 19.2 2.628 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.66 0.0% Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf; L01GA 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 5.7 17.7 70.28 0.6% Shop; 1.19 W /sf; L01SH 19.3 2.621 24.4 0.6 6.0 17.7 70.63 0.1% Super T-8 lamps; LTE01 19.5 2.554 24.4 0.6 5.2 17.7 69.95 1.0% Extra efficient ballasts; LTE02 19.3 2.605 24.4 0.6 5.8 17.7 70.43 0.3% Water to water heat pump; MAC01 10.1 2.018 24.3 0.6 6.1 17.7 60.77 14.0% Ground heat pump, Alternate 1; MGH01 10.7 2.257 23.7 0.6 6.1 17.7 61.05 13.6% Premium efficiency supply /return fan motors; MMT03 19.3 2.618 24.1 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.37 0.4% Premium efficiency pump motors; MMT04 19.2 2.629 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 70.66 0.0% CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 18.0 2.599 24.4 0.6 6.1 17.7 69.34 1.9% Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans; M0A22 15.6 2.629 8.6 0.6 6.1 17.7 51.11 27.7% Sensible heal recovery (vehicle manitenance); MHRS1 10.0 2.018 24.3 0.6 6.1 17.7 60.74 0.0% Total heat recovery (offices); MHRT1 1 17.1 2.560 24.6 0.6 6.1 17.7 1 68.60 2.9% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 @ THE W E l DT G R D u P P. 15 Peak Conditions 144.776 SOFT. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 16 Peak Electric Gas Cooling HeaUn 3 2 2 4 m A Yj � c w c w s` g_' m 5� S c 5 m iu mm �"er� °� v Y'r� S $$ mm am'C r X ri Code Base; CODE1 3.3 473 4,510 1,224 118 5,498 R -16 wall assembly (offices); EWCOt 3.3 471 2 0% 4,510 0% 1,229 118 0 0.4% 5,439 59 1.1% R -20 wall assembly (offices); EWCO2 3.2 469 4 1% 4,510 0% 1,230 118 1 0.5% 5,421 77 1.4% R -16 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC03 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,229 118 0 0.4% 5,469 29 0.5% R -20 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWCD4 3.3 471 2 0% 4,510 0% 1.230 118 1 0.5% 5,451 38 0.7% R -24 roof assemby; ERCOt 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,227 118 0 0.2% 5,493 5 0.1% R -30 roof assembly; ERCO2 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,245 116 2 1.7% 5,460 38 0.7% R40 roof assembly; ERC03 3.3 473. 0 0% 4,560 -1% 1,259 115 3 2.8% 5,429 69 1.3% Lo E clear 11 alum frame; W0601 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,213 119 (1) -0.9% 5,478 20 0.4% Lo E tint 11 alum frame; W09D1 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 D% 1,233 117 1 0.7% 5,479 19 D.3% Lo E clear, high visible transml(tanceJ alum frame; W1201 3.3 475 (2) 0% 4,510 0% 1,236 117 1 1.0% 5,476 22 0.4% Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1301 3.3 473 0 0% 4.51D 0% 1,244 116 2 1.6% 5,477 22 0.4% VIE-85 ii2; W5101 3.3 474 (1) 0% 4,510 0% 1,220 119 (0) -0.3% 5,479 2D 0.4% Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor 8 lock rms.; D3101 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 O% 1,225 11B D 0.0% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Dimming daylighting control at open office 8 dining; D3102 3.3 476 (3) -1% 4,510 0% 1,247 116 2 1.8% 5,499 (D) 0.0% Stepped daylighiing control at shops; D31D3 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,229 118 0 0.4% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Dimming daylighting control at shops: D3104 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1238 117 1 1.1% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Pmate office occupancy sensor control; LCP01 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,225 118 0 0.0% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 D"/o 1,225 118 0 0.1% 5,499 (1) 0.0% Private office dual level switching; LCP04 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,225 lie 0 0.0% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Open once occupancy sensor control; LCO01 3.3 473 0 D% 4,510 0% 1,225 118 0 0.0% 5,499 (1) 0.0% Open office dual level switching; LCO04 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,228 118 0 0.3% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCN1 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 D% 1,225 118 0 0.1% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Conference dual level switching; LCCN4 3.3 473 0 0% 4.51D 0% 1,225 118 0 0.0% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Conference manual dimming; LCCN5 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,225 118 0 0.1% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST1 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Mechlelec occupancy sensor control; LCME7 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 5,498 0 0.0% Corridor occupancy sensor wntrol; LCCI1 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Restroom occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,226 118 O 0.1% 5,498 (D) 0.0% Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGA1 3.3 474 (1) 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 D 0.0% 5,498 0 0.0% Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMH1 3.2 461 12 3% 4,510 0% 1225 118 0 0.0% 5,505 (7) -0.1% Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 3.2 469 4 1 % 4,510. 0% 1,231 118 1 0.6% 5,500 (2) 0.0% Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH1 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 11e (0) 0.0% 5,500 (2) 0.0% Wash bay dual level switctdng; LCWH4 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSHt 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,226 118 0 0.2% 5,499 (1) 0.0% Shop dual level switching; LCSH4 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,226 118 0 0.2% 5,499 t0) 0.0% Open office direct system at 50 to. 0.95 W /O; L0200 3.3 473 0 D% 4,510 0% 1,234 117 1 0.8% 5,499 0) 0.0% Open once Indirect system at 50 to , 1.15 Wlsf, L0300 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,231 118 1 0.5% 5,499 (1) 0.0% Open office task (0.3 Wlsf) ambient et 30 fc, 0.65 Mat. L0400 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,234 117 1 0.8% 5,499 (1) 0.0% Open office directrindirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf, L0500 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1235 117 1 0.9% 5,499 ill 0.0% Private office direct system, 55 fc, aid TB, 1.00 Wlsf; L01PO 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,226 118 0 0.1% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8. 0.50 W1sf; L02PO 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,227 118 0 0.2% 5,499 01 0.0% Private office dlrectlindhect system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.DO W /sf; L03PO 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,226 lie D 0.1% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Private office direcL(indirecl system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W/s . L04PO 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,227 118 D 0.2% 5,499 (1) 0.0% Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf, aid TO ambient (a] 25 fe, 0.50 W/e . LOSPO 3.3 473 D 0% 4,510 D% 1,226 118 0 0.1% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf, L02CN 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510, D% 1,225 11a 0 0.0% 5,498 (D) 0.0% Conference Indirect system at 50 to, 1.35 Wls ,, L03CN 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 (0) 0.0% 5,498 0 0.0% Conference directlindireat system at 40 fc, 1.10 Mot; L04CN 3.3 473 0 0% 4,51D 0% 1,225 118 0 0.0% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Wash bay l4amp, 8 -foot TS fixture spaced 12 fL o.c., 0.60 W /sf; L02WH 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Wash bay l4amp, 8 -foot TO fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 W /sf; L03WH 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 (0) 0.0% 5,501) (2) 0.0% Wash bay l4amp, &foot TO future spaced 37.11. o.c., 0.20 Met, L04WH 3.3 480 (7) -1% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 (0) 0.0% 5,SDD (2) 0.0% Wash bay l4amp, &foot TO fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 Mot; L05W H 3.3 480 (7) -1% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 (0) 0.0% 5,501 (2) 0.0% Vehicle maintenance lighting design Q, 0.53 W /sf; L05MH 3.2 463 10 2% 4,510 0% 1.236 117 1 D.9% 5,502 (3) -0.1% Storage; 0.68 W /sf; L01ST 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 D O.D% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Mecldelec; 1.28 Met L01ME 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 5,498 D 0.0% Corridor. 0.43 W /ef; L01 Cl 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 D 0.0% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Restroom; 0.77 Met; LO1RR 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,225 118 D 0.1% 5,498 (0) 0.0% Vehicle storage; 0.17 Mai, L01GA 3.3 472 1 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 5,498 0 0.0% Shop; 1.18 W /sf; L01SH 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,226 lie 0 0.2% 5,499 (0) 0.0% Super T-8 lamps; LTE01 3.2 467 6 1% 4,510 0% 1,244 116 2 1.6% 5,503 (4) -0.1% Extra efficient ballasts; LTE02 3.3 472 1 0% 4,510 0% 1,230 11B 1 0.5% 5,SDD (1) 0.0% Water to water heat pump; MAC01 2.9 421 52 11% 4,510 0% 1,157 125 j7) -5.8% 5,550 (57, -0.9% Ground heat pump, Ahemate 1; MGH01 2.8 40B 65 14% 4,510 0% 1,292 112 6 5.2% 5,498 0 0.0% Premium efficiency supply/return fan motors; MMT03 3.3 479 (B) -1% 4,510 0% 1,228 118 0 0.1% 5,496 2 0.0% Premium efficiency pump motors; MMTD4 3.3 473 0 0% 4,510 0% 1,224 116 0 0.0% 5,498 0 0.0% CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 3.2 461 12 3% 4,510 0% 1,315 110 8 6.9% 5,243 255 4.6% Carbon morcudde sensor control of garage vent fans; MOA22 2.7 393 80 17% 3,430 24% 1,224 118 0 0.0% 4,631 867 15.8% - Sensible heal recovery (vehicle manftenance); MHRS7 2.9 421 0 0% 4,510 : 0% 1,157 125 0 0.0% 5,339 211 3.6% Total heat remove (offices); MHRT7 3.2 465 B 2% 4,510 0% 1,387 104 14 11.7% 5,161 337 6.1% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 16 Annual Energy by Fuel Source led 77A cry FT Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 ©THE W E I DT GROUP P. 17 Annual Energy Annual Electric Annual Gas U N � f �z D N rc N C wg' O7 i m 22 me OM Code Base; CODE? 10,231 2,800,82A 675 R -16 wall assembly (offices); EWC01 10,089 143 1% 2,758,983 41,837 1% 675 0 0% R -20 wall assembly (offices); EWCO2 10,049 183 2% 2,747,211 53,609 2% 675 0 0% R -16 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC03 10,167 65 1% 2,781,827 18,993 1% 675 0 0% R -20 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC04 10,147 85 1% 2,775,992 24,828 1% 675 0 0% R -24 root assembly, ERC01 10,219 13 0% 2,797,016 3,804 0% 675 0 0% R -30 roof assembly, ER002 10,143 as 1% 2,774,799 26,021 1% 675 0 0% R-40 roof assembly; ERC03 10,073 158 2% 2,754,995 45,825 2% 673 2 0% Lo E clear 1/ alum frame; W0601 10,158 73 1% 2,779,345 21,475 1% 675 0 0% Lo E tint 1/ alum frame; W0901 10,183 48 0% 2,786,743 14,077 1% 675 0 0% Lo E dear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W 1201 10,177 54 1% 2,784,911 15,909 1% 675 0 0% Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1301 10,192 39 0% 2,789,266 11,554 0% 675 0 0% VE -85#2; W5101 10,163 69 1% 2,780,692 20,128 1% 675 0 0% Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor & lode rms.; D3101 10,203 29 0% 2,792,411 8,409 0°% 675 0 0% Dimming, daylighting control at open office & dining; D3102 10,188 43 0% 2,788,171 12,649 0% 675 0 0% Stepped daylfghting control at shops; D3103 10,226 6 0% 2,799,109 1,711 0% 675 0 0% Dimming daylighting control at shops; 03104 10,211 21 0% 2,794,689 6,131 0% 675 0 0% Private office occupancy sensor control; LCP01 10,225 6 0% 2,799,007 1,813 0% 675 0 0% Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 10,224 8 0% 2,798,490 2,330 0% 675 0 0% Private office dual level switching; LCP04 10,228 4 0% 2,799,743 1,077 0% 675 0 0% Open office occupancy sensor control; LCO01 10,723 8 0% 2,798,411 2,409 0% 675 0 0% Open office dual level switching; LCO04 10,227 5 0% 2,799,408 1,412 0% 675 0 0% Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCN1 10,230 1 0% 2,800,522 298 0% 675 0 0% Conference dual level switching; LCCN4 10,231 1 0% 2,800,604 216 0% 675 0 0% Conference manual dimming; LCCN5 10,231 1 0% 2,800,590 230 0% 675 0 0% Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST1 10,231 1 0% 2,800,593 227 0% 675 0 0% MerlVelec occupancy sensor control; LCMEt 10,231 0 0% 2,800,820 0 0% 675 0 0% Corridor occupancy sensor control; LCCl1 10,231 0 0% 2,800,743 77 0% 675 0 0% Restroom occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 10,228 3 0% 2,799,929 891 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGA1 10,204 28 0% 2,792,628 8,192 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMH1 10,206 26 0% 2,793,279 7,541 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 10,211 20 0% 2,794,884 5,936 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH7 10,223 8 0% 2,798,453. . 2,367 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay dual level switching; LCWH4 10,228 3 0% 2,799,816 1,004 0% 675 0 0% Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSH7 10,224 7 0% 2,798,655 2,165 0% 675 0 0% Shop dual level switching; LCSH4 10,226 6 0% 2,799,158 1,662 0% 675 0 0% Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.95 Mal; L0200 10,214 18 0% 2,795,598 5,222 0% 675 0 0% Open office indirect system at 50 fc, 1.15 Mat; L0300 10,220 11 0% 2,797,518 3,302 0% 675 0 0% Open office task (0.3 Mat) ambient at 30 fc, 0.65 W /st,, L0400 10,214 18 0% 2,795,597 5,223 0% 675 0 0% Open office diredlndired system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf, L0500 10,212 19 0% 2,795,223 5,597 0% 675 0 0% Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.00 WlsF L01PO 10,224 7 0% 2,798,735 2,085 0% 675 0 0% Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W/af, L02PO 10,218 14 0% 2,796,816 4,004 0% 675 0 0% Private office directrindired system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /s; 1_03PO 10,224 7 01Y. 2,798,735 2,085 0% 675 0 0% Private office dired(ndired system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf, 1_04PO 10,218 14 0% 2,796,816 4,004 0% 675 0 0% Private office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 W /sf; 1_05PO 10,223 9 0% 2,798,202 2,618 0% 675 0 0% Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /af, L02CN 10,231 1 0% 2,800,643 177 0% 675 0 0% Conference indirect system at 50 fc , 1.35 W /sf; L03CN 10,232 (0) 0% 2,800,880 (60) 0% 675 0 0% Conference directfindired system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf; L04CN 10,231 1 0% 2,800,599 221 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8-foot T8 fixture spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 W /sf; L02WH 10,228 3 0% 2,799,868 952 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8-foot T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 W /sf; L03WH 10,218 14 0% 2,796,830 3,990 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -toot T8 fixture spaced 37 ft. c.c., 0.20 W /sf, L04WH 10,216 15 0% 2,796,294 4,526 0% 675 0 0% Wash bay 1 -lamp, 8 -Toot T8 fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 W /sf; LO5WH 10,214 17 0% 2,795,751 5,069 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle maintenance lighting design @, 0.53 W /sf, L05MH 10,199 32 0% 2,791,424 9,396 0% 675 0 0% Storage; 0.68 W /sf, L01ST 10,231 0 0% 2,800,728 92 0% 675 0 0% Mech/elec;1.28 W /sf, L01ME 10,231 0 0% 2,800,820 0 0% 675 0 0% Corridor, 0.43 W /sf; L01CI 10,230 1 0% 2,800,467 353 0% 675 0 0% Restroom;0.77W /sf, L01 RR 10,230 1 0% 2,800,513 307 0% 675 0 0% Vehicle storage; 0.17 Mat; L01GA 10,174 57 1% 2,784,090 16,730 1% 675 0 0% Shop; 119 Mal; L01SH 10,226 6 0% 2,799,158 1,662 0% 675 0 0% Super T-8 lamps; LTE01 10,127 105 1% 2,770,170 30,650 1% 675 0 0% Extra efficient ballasts; LTE02 10,196 35 0% 2,790,486 10,334 0% 675 0 0% Water to water heat pump; MAC01 8,798 1,434 14% 2,380,639 420,181 15% 675 0 0% Ground heat pump, Alternate 1; MGHOt 8,838 1,393 14% 2,392,451 408,369 15% 675 0 0% Premium efficiency supply /return fan motors; MMT03 10,187 44 0% 2,787,BD9 13,011 0% 675 (0) 0% Premium efficiency pump motors; MMT04 10,229 2 0% 2,800,223 597 0% 675 0 0% CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 10,039 193 2% 2,744,397 56,423 2% 675 0 0% Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans; MOA22 7,400 2,8.31 28% 2,126,418 24°% 145 530 79% Senslble Kea_t recovery (vehicle menitenance); MHRSt 8,794 4 . _0% 2,379;522 _674,402 1,11T _ _0% 675 0 0% Total heat recove (offices); MHRT1 9,932 300 3% 2,712,947 87,673 3% 675 0 0% Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 ©THE W E I DT GROUP P. 17 1 Air Pollution 144,776 SQ.FT. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 @ THE W E I DT GROUP P. 18 N N N N 0� fS C CO A tS N m fD m m M N E C (n N E .Z N E rn N iZ X E C N X 1=.1 .�... C tj m 2 N �• W E N y m N C v w zws z C S °E° tO�w� COiw° a° a5rn corn Code Base; CODE1 2,005 4.93 4.33 0.33 2,015 R -16 wall assembly (offices); EWC01 1,976 29 4.85 0.07 4.27 0.06 0.32 0.00 1,985 29.5 R -20 wall assembly (offices); EWCO2 1,968 38 4.83 0.09 4.25 0.08 0.32 0.01 1,977 37.8 R -16 wag assembly (veh.-Storage); EWC03 1,992 13 4.89 0.03 4.30 0.03 0.33 0.00 2,001 13.4 R -20 wall assembly (veh. Storage); EWC04 1,988 17 4.88 0.04 4.29 0.04 0.33 0.00 1,997 17.5 R -24 roof assembly, ERC01 2,003 3 4.92 0.01 4.33 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,012 2.7 R -30 roof assembly; ERCO2 1,987 18 4.88 0.05 429 0.04 0.33 0.00 1,996 18.3 R40 roof assembly; ERC03 1,973 32 4.85 0.08 4.26 0.07 0.32 0.01 1,982 32.4 Lo E Gear 1l alum frame; W0601 1,990 15 4.89 0.04 4.30 0.03 0.33 0.00 2,000 15.1 Lo E tint 1/ alum frame; W0901 1,995 10 4.90 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,005 9.9 Lo E clear, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1201 1,994 11 4.90 0.03 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,004 11.2 Lo E tint, high visible transmittance/ alum frame; W1301 1,995 8 4.91 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,007 8.1 VE-85 #2; W5101 1,991 14 4.89 0.04 4.30 0.03 0.33 0.00 2,001 14.2 Stepped daylighting control at veh. Stor 8 lock rms.; D3101 1,999 6 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 5.9 Dimming daylighting control at open office 8 dining; D3102 1,996 9 4.91 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,0D6 8.9 Stepped daylighting control at shops; D3103 2,004 1 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 1.2 Dimming daylighting control at shops; D3104 2,001 4 4.92 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,010 4.3 Private office occupancy sensor control; LCP01 2,004 1 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.3 Private office dual level occupancy sensor control; LCP03 2,004 2 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.6 Private office dual level switching; LCP04 2,004 1 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 0.8 Open office occupancy sensor control; LC001 2,003 2 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.7 Open office dual level switching; LCO04 2,004 1 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 1.0 Conference occupancy sensor control; LCCN1 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.2 Conference dual level switching; LCCN4 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 O.OD 2,015 0.2 Conference manual dimming; LCCN5 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.2 Storage occupancy sensor control; LCST1 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.2 Mech/elec occupancy sensor control; LCME1 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.0 Corridor occupancy sensor control; LCCI1 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.1 Restroom occupancy sensor control; LCRR1 2,005 1 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 0.6 Vehicle storage occupancy sensor control; LCGAt 1,999 6 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 5.8 Vehicle maintenance occupancy sensor control; LCMHt 2,000 5 4.91 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,009 5.3 Vehicle maintenance dual level switching; LCMH4 2,001 4 4.92 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,011 4.2 Wash bay occupancy sensor control; LCWH1 2,004 2 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.7 Wash bay dual level switching; LCWH4 2,004 1 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 0.7 Shop occupancy sensor control; LCSH1 2,004 2 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.5 Shop dual level switching; LCSH4 2,004 1 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 1.2 Open office direct system at 50 fc, 0.95 W /sf•, L0200 2,002 4 4.92 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,011 3.7 Open office indirect system at 50 fc. 1.15 W /sf; L0300 2,003 2 4.92 0.01 4.33 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,012 2.3 Open office task (0.3 W /sf) ambient at 30 fc, 0.65 W /sf; L0400 2,002 4 4.92 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,011 3.7 Open office direct/indirect system at 40 fc, 0.90 W /sf; L0500 2,001 4 4.92 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,011 3.9 Private office direct system, 55 fc, std T8, 1.OD W /O; L01PO 2,004 1 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.5 Private office direct system, 30 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf; L02PO 2,0112 3 4.92 0.01 4.33 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,012 2.8 Private office directfindirect system, 50 fc, std T8, 1.00 W /sf; L03PO 2,004 1 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.5 Private office directfindirect system, 25 fc, std T8, 0.50 W /sf; L04PO 2,002 3 4.92 0.01 4.33 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,012 2.8 le office task @ 0.3 W /sf, std T8 ambient @ 25 fc, 0.50 W /sf; L05PO 2,003 2 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,013 1.8 Conference direct system at 50 fc, 1.15 W /sf; L02CN 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.1 Conference indirect system at 50 fc, 1.35 W /sf; L03CN 2,005 (0) 4.93 (0.00) 4.33 (0.00) 0.33 (0.00) 2,015 (0.0) Conference direct/indirect system at 40 fc, 1.10 W /sf; L04CN 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.2 h bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 facture spaced 12 ft. o.c., 0.60 W /sf; L02WH 2,005 1 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 0.7 sh bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 25 ft. o.c., 0.30 W /sf; L03WH 2,002 3 4.92 0.01 4.33 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,012 2.8 sh bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 37 ft. o.c., 0.20 W /sf; L04WH 2,002 3 4.92 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,012 3.2 sh bay 1 -lamp, 8 -foot T8 fixture spaced 60 ft. o.c., 0.12 W /sf; L05WH 2,002 4 4.92 0.01 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,011 3.6 Vehicle maintenance lighting design @, 0.53 W /st; L05MH 1,999 7 4.91 0.02 4.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 2,008 6.6 Storage; 0.68 MO., L01ST 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.1 Mech/elec; 1.28 W /O; L01ME 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.0 Corridor, 0.43 W /sf; L01CI 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.2 Restroom; 077 W /sf; L01RR 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,015 0.2 Vehicle storage; 0.17 W /sf, L01GA 1,993 12 4.90 0.03 4.31 0.03 0.33 0.00 2,003 11.8 Shop; 1.19 W /sf, L01SH 2,004 1 4.92 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 1.2 Super T-8 lamps; LTE01 1,984 22 4.87 0.05 4.28 0.05 0.32 0.00 1,993 21.6 Extra efficient ballasts; LTE02 1,998 7 1 4.91 0.02 4.32 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,007 7.3 Water to water heat pump; MAC01 1,710 295 4.19 0.74 3.69 0.64 0.28 0.05 1,718 296.3 Ground heat pump, Alternate 1; MGH01 1,719 287 421 0.72 3.71 0.62 0.28 0.05 1,727 288.0 Premium efficiency supply/retum fan motors; MMT03 1,996 9 4.90 0.02 4.31 0.02 0.33 0.00 2,006 9.2 Premium efficiency pump motors; MMT04 2,005 0 4.93 0.00 4.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 2,014 0.4 CO2 control of outside air, MOA02 1,966 40 4.83 0.10 4.25 0.09 0.32 0.01 1,975 39.8 Carbon monoxide sensor control of garage vent fans; MOA22 1,501 504 3.74 1.19 3.26 1.07 0.25 0.08 1,508 506.7 Sensible heat recovery (vehicle manitenance); MHRS1 11710 1 4.19 0.00 3.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 1,718 0.8 Total heat recovery offices); MHRT1 1,944 62 4.77 0.15 4.20 0.13 0.32 0.01 1,953 62.0 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 @ THE W E I DT GROUP P. 18 Appendix D. Bundle Lighting Power Space Type Code Bundle 1 Bundle 2 Bundle 3 Bundle 4 Private office 1.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 Open office 1.45 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Conference 1.30 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Storage 0.80 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 Mech /elec 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Corridor 0.50 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Restroom 0.90 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Vehicle storage 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.17' 0.17 Vehicle maintenancE 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Wash bay 0.70 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.12 Shop 1.40 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 Dining 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Locker Room & Shol 0.601 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Building Average 1 0.401 0.341 0.34 0.34 0.33 Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 19 Appendix E. Verification Flowchart Owner I Design Team Xcel Energy I Energy Design Assistance Bundle Selection Owner/ design team Form to select one bundle. Xcet Energy Bundle Design team sends construction documents to The Weidt Group for review. Xcel Energy Issues an Incentive Rider and notifies The Weidt Group to begin verification activities The Weidt Group sends Bundle Requirements to tI design team. Construction Documents Design Team provides The Weiel Group requested submittals/ schedules field review of manufacturer's Information installed strategies. The Weidt Group completes field review of Installed strategies. vent The Weidt Group writes a Report strategy verification report for the owner, design team and Xcel Energy. Owner receives Xcel Energy issues Incentive payment Incentive payment. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 20 CD Review The Weidt Group memo assembles CD Review (also cent memo for design team, to Xcel owner, and Xcel Energy Enerevl BUILDING /RENOVATION F WORK COMPLETE AND OCCUPIED... Owner notifies Xcel Energy / The WeldtGroup orconstrucdon completion The Weidt Group requests submittals/ manufacturer's Information. Design Team provides The Weiel Group requested submittals/ schedules field review of manufacturer's Information installed strategies. The Weidt Group completes field review of Installed strategies. vent The Weidt Group writes a Report strategy verification report for the owner, design team and Xcel Energy. Owner receives Xcel Energy issues Incentive payment Incentive payment. Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 20 Appendix F. Sample Measurement and Verification Plan The following details the Measurement and Verification Plan for the different strategy categories. Architectural 1. Review Construction Documents for selected energy conservation measures 2. Review construction submittals for selected energy conservation measures Electrical 1. Review Construction Documents for selected controls, fixtures, lamps, ballasts 2. Review construction submittals for selected controls, fixtures, lamps, ballasts 3. After construction completion, visually inspect installed controls, fixtures, lamps, and ballasts 4. After construction completion, functionally test the installed controls, verify response to changes and sensitivity 5. After building occupancy, datalog a sample of lighting circuits to determine performance of lighting .controls Mechanical 1. Review Construction Documents for selected energy conservation measures 2. Review construction submittals for selected energy conservation measures 3. After construction completion, visually inspect installed energy conservation measures 4. After building occupancy, datalog a sample fan to determine VFD response 5. After building occupancy, use the building energy management system to verify response to COZ sensors Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN . Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 21 Appendix G. Key Strategy Documentation Guidelines This Appendix lists information that should be in the Construction Documents for several key strategy types in order to ensure that those strategies will be properly implemented. Occupancy Sensors Occupancy B1 Type of occupancy sensor B2 Location of occupancy sensor B3 Sensitivity settings for the sensor B4 Time out settings for the sensor B5 Override controls an how they interact with the system and location Contractor B10 • Requirements Product Data Sheets showing the following 1. Occupancy sensor features 2. Dimensions and ratings B11 Drawings that locate the sensor and controller in each zone 1. Specific to the project 2. Sensor cone of vision B12 Wiring diagrams 1. Showing entire installation 2. Specific to the project 3. Overlaid on Reflected Ceiling Plans B13 Compatibility documentation 1. Occupancy sensor 2. Ballast 3. Lamp 4. Fixture 5. Other lighting controls 6. Singal, control wiring, interface, input output, radio frequencies Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 22 Daylighting Controls Contractor Daylight A.1 Identify the target design illuminance level within each daylight control zone A.2 When the controls would turn off or dim the electric lights A.3 When the controls would turn on or brighten the electric lights A.4 What type of control algorithm is being used (open loop system or closed loop system) A.5 Time delay and fade rate response of the daylighting system to changes in light level A.6 Location of manual override switches A.7 Describe how other lighting controls (i.e. manual overrides) interact with the daylight system Contractor Submittal Requirements Product Data Sheets showing the following A.12 1. Photo sensor features 2. Controller features 3. Dimensions and ratings A.13 j Drawings that locate the photo sensor and controller in each zone 1. Specific to the project 2. Plans, interior elevations and sections of each daylighting zone that show the sensor cone of vision A.14 Wiring diagrams 1. Showing entire Installation 2. Specific to the project 3. Overlaid on Reflected Ceiling Plans A.15 Compatibility documentation 1. Photo sensor 2. Controller 3. Ballast 4. Lamp 5. Fixture 6. Other lighting controls 7. Signal, control wiring, interface, input output, radio frequencies Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E I DT GROUP P. 23 Super T8 Lighting Super C1 -. Produces 3100 lumens or more at Initial conditions with 2950 maintainted lumens C2 Rated at 32 watts or less C3 Available at CRI over 80 C4 Achieve 24,000 hours of rated life or more at 3 hours per start (instant start, rapid -start or programmed -start ballast) C5 Can be operated with dimming ballats Condensing Boilers Variable Frequency Drives Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E) DT GROUP P. 24 Variable F1 -. Drives on Supply/Return/Exhaust VAV boxes programmed to allow modeled minimum air flows at low loads F2 Static pressure sensor locations defined F3 Variable air volume control sequence F4 Control sequence for polling VAV boxes and re- setting static pressure based on box positions Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E) DT GROUP P. 24 0 CO2 Control of Outside Air Critical elements of the CO2 outside air reset system The goal of the CO2 sensor is to use CO2 levels as a proxy for occupancy and to reduce outside air levels when CO2 levels and occupancy are low, as shown in the graph below. CO2 Sensor Control Strategy Concept Design Minimum Outside Air Operating Minimum Outside Air 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 Percentage of Design Occupancy Xcel Energy Edina Public Works Facility, Edina, MN Energy Design Assistance Bundle Report September 3, 2009 © THE W E 1 DT GROUP P 25 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item IV.B. From: Debra Mangen Consent City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: September 15, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Action ® Motion Donations ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-81 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465,03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to Edina Art Center: Terry Dondlinger Juried Art Show Donations: Mary A. Bang Patrick Cook Rick & Eddi Fesler Donation to Edina Park & Recreation Department: Karol Emmerich Donation to Braemar Golf Course Robert Malby Dated: September 15, 2009 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk $50 Elizabeth Eisenbrey $100 Ellingson & Ellingson LTD $100 Julia Timm & Stephan Kieu $100 $50 Michael Kelly $500 $50 NorthMarq Real Estate $2500 $50 56 Clumps Daylilies $450 James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 15, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 I.V_M_ Lei 01 To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item I`7.C. Consent F] From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only F] Date: September 15, 2009 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: Zoning Ordinance amendment regarding drive- Action ® Motion through facilities in the PCD- 1 Zoning District. F1 Resolution ® Ordinance Discussion Information & Background: Attached is the Zoning Ordinance amendment that would allow restaurants to have a drive - through window in the PCD -1 Zoning District. This Ordinance was approved by first reading at the last City Council meeting. Suggested changes made by the City Council have been incorporated into the Ordinance. Changes include: • The menu board and audio system may not be located on a side of a building that faces a single- family residential area in all commercial zoning districts. • Service windows, audio system and menu boards are limited to one. Amended the existing "service bay' language to be clear. • Added reference to the permitted use section of the code regarding meeting conditions for restaurants with drive - through facilities. (Section 850.16. Subd. 2.) • Editing. Recommended Action: Approve the second reading of the attached Zoning Ordinance amendment. ORDINANCE NO. 2009-11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING REGULATION OF DRIVE - THROUGH FACILITIES The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.07, Subdivision 14 is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 14 Drive - Through Facility Standards. A. Number of stacking spaces in addition to the vehicle(s) being served: 1. Financial institution: 3 stacking spaces per bay 2. Car wash: 25 stacking spaces per bay 3. Accessory car wash: 2 stacking spaces per bay 4. A restaurant in PCD -1 District: 10 stacking spaces per bay 4-.5. All other uses: 4 stacking spaces per bay B. Location of Stacking Space. 1. No stacking space shall encroach into any drive aisle necessary for the circulation of vehicles. 2. All stacking spaces shall provide the same setbacks as are required by this Section for parking spaces. 3. In the case of uses described in subparagraph 4. of paragraph A. of Subd. 14 above, if the drive - through bay is equipped with a facility for placing an order which is separated from the location at which the product or merchandise is received by the customer, not less than three of the required stacking spaces shall be provided at the ordering point. C. Minimum Size of Stacking Space. The minimum size of each stacking space shall be nine feet wide by 18 feet deep. D. Accessory Canopies and Mechanical Equipment. All canopies and equipment appurtenant to a drive - through facility shall provide the same setbacks as are required for principal buildings. E. Facilities Accessory to Restaurants. Drive - through facilities accessory to restaurants shall be limited to two service bays windows and two audio systems and menu boards. F. Restaurant in the PCD -1 district. 1. Mav only sell coffee, non alcoholic beverages. pastries and donuts from the drive - through window. 2. Hours of operation of the drive - through window shall be limited to 6:00 am to 6:00 pm. 3. Minimum lot size shall be 1 acre. 4. Levels of noise shall be measured at property lines and shall satisfy established state regulations. 5. No part of the public street or boulevard may be used for stacking of automobiles. 6. Drive- through facilities shall be limited to one service windows and one audio system and menu board. 6. Menu board and audio system shall not be located on a side of a building that faces single - family residential homes or property zoned single - family residential. Section 2. Sub Section 850.16. Subd. 2 is hereby amended as follows: Restaurants, but excluding "drive -ins" and drive - through facilities, other than as allowed in Section 850.07, Subd. 145.. Section 3. Sub Section 850.16. Subd. 7 is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7. Accessory Uses in PCD -1. Off - street parking facilities. Buildings for the storage of merchandise to be retailed by the related principal use. Not more than two amusement devices. Drive through facilities, except those accessory to � financial institutions. 'iRd ii) food establish McRts as defoRed in SeGtiGn 771 of the Gity Code A MVIIVI I1IIV 111 restaurant may have a drive - through facility subiect to the requirements i Section 850.07, Subd. 14.F. Produce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the Manager Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 12009 City Clerk To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor & City Council Cary Teague Planning Director September 15, 2009 Lot Division to shift the existing lot line that divides 4306 Grimes and 4209 Morningside Road for the purpose of providing a 20 -foot strip of land to 4209 Morningside Road. Deadline for a city decision: December 1, 2009 Planning Commission Recommended Action: REPORT/RECOW Agenda Item IV.D. Consent ATION Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion On September 2, 2009, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Lot Division 4306 Grimes and 4209 Morningside Road. Information/Background: See attached Planning Commission report which includes the staff recommendation for approval and the Planning Commission minutes. nm B n A o e` 0 \" ees MINUTE SUMMARY Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Mike Fischer, Jeff Carpenter, Julie Rsser, Staunton, Michael Schroeder, Steve Brown, F�o1 Schnettler ; STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenak ancy Scherer, Kevin r� Gcabiel and Patrick I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: f The minutes of the July 29,1 :00.9, meeting were filed as submitted. II. NEW BUSINESS:-_. ! \\ 2009.0001.096 Lot Divt io Greg McCu 4306 Grime �.4204,,.Morni venue ide Road Planner Teague informed the Commission Greg McCullough, is proposing to shift the existing lot line that divides 4306 Grimes and 4209 Morningside Road for the purpose of providing a 20400t strip of land to 4209 Morningside Road.The shift would follow the recent /lot division that dedicated 20 feet of land to the adiacent property to the east, the Morningside Church. 1W Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 2, 2009 Page 2 of 6 Planner Teague explained that the two properties are 27,487 square feet in size. The previous home located at 4306 Grimes has been torn down, and several large trees removed. A new home is planned on the site. This lot is currently 19,265 square feet in size, after the recent transfer of land. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division as requested. Commission Action Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend Lot Division,approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion, carried: 2008.0014.09a Overa_ W 'Development - Ptah- Amendrifent- r inal Site Plan Wayzat� Properties 482077, Street West % Planner Presentation �' I Planner Teague told the Commission Wayzata Properties is proposing to remodel the existing Walsh Title building at 4820._7 t"- Street West from an 18,931 square foot office building,to an 8,279 square fo, ,140, seat Little Szechuan Restaurant, and -a 10,652 square foot office. T 's building is located in the Gatewa /Development; which has an overall/development plan for this entire area. This site, is_designated,for office spaCe;on the plan. Planner Teague explained that the request requires an Overall Development Plan Amendment to allow a restaurant on this,site"andFi l Site Plan Approval. P`nner Teague reported that Ki ey -Horn conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed dev4lopment. Kimley -Horn concludes that the existing roadway, system, could support the proposed project. Per the original approval of the overall -- development plan „mitigation measures are required for this overall project. These measures are'spelled out specifically in the Preliminary Development Plan. Agreement for Gateway. There are no traffic improvements that would be trig erect as -pat :afthis- guest: The Transportation Commission considered theef at their August 20, 2009 meeting, and tabled the request, due to concerns over parking. With regard to parking Planner Teague explained that based on the number of seats and employees in the restaurant, and the square footage of the remaining M RESOLUTION NO. 2009-82 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION OF 4209 MORNINGSIDE ROAD AND 4306 GRIMES AVENUE WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: City Of Edina DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED 4306 Grimes Avenue See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit A 4209 Morningside Road The East 75 feet of the West 150 feet of Lot 1, Grimes Homestead, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: 4306 Grimes Avenue See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit B 4209 Morning_side Road See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit C WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this _ day of 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-82 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk Exhibit A EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4306 GRIMES AVENUE) Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also excepting therefrom that part of the North 20.00 feet of said Lot 2 Which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet of Lot 2 and said line there terminating Exhibit B NEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4306 GRIMES AVENUE) Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also excepting therefrom all of the North 20.00 feet thereof. Exhibit C NEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4209 Morningside Road) The East 75.00 feet of the West 150.00 feet of Lot 1, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also the North 20.00 feet of Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Which lies westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast comer of said Lot 2; thence on an 'assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet of Lot 2;and said line there terminating. ok a rn ... PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 2, 2009 2009.007.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. Greg McCullough, is proposing to shift the existing lot line that divides 4306 Grimes and 4209 Morningside Road for the purpose of providing a 20 -foot strip of land to 4209 Morningside Road. (See pages A4 —A7.) The shift would follow the recent lot division that dedicated 20 feet of land to the adjacent property to the east, the Morningside Church. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses are all single - family homes zoned and guided low- density residential. Existing Site Features The two properties are 27,487 square feet in size. The previous home located at 4306 Grimes has been torn down, and several large trees removed. A new home is planned on the site. This lot is currently 19,265 square feet in size, after the recent transfer of land. (See pages A4 —A6 and A9.) The property at 4209 Morningside contains a single - family home. The site is 8,222 square feet in size. (See pages A2 —A3 and A8.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density residential Zoning: R -1, Single- family residential Primary Issue Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. The lines between these two lots would simply be shifted to allow additional area for the home at 4209 Morningside. it would bring this lot more into compliance with the median lot sizes in the neighborhood. The line would follow the new lot line of the Church. (See page A5.) The area being dedicated to 4209 is only 1,498 square feet in size. No additional lots would be created. The resulting lot areas would be 9,720 and 17,767 square feet in size. The resulting division would bring 4209 closer to the median lot area of 9,951 square feet. Also, the new 120 -foot lot depth of 4209 would also be closer to the median lot depth of the area of 140 feet. Resulting lot widths would not be altered. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division as requested. Deadline for a city decision: December 1, 2009 2 Al City of Edina 1727 4TH 1721 1219 1719 2x+6 LegelSd /x27 1726 ISSi x142 sill Ilt9 /x70 Mouse MUmWrlabele 1171 1771 ai 4z1H s7I3 '237 sTI] /220 4223 4712 Street Name Ls-I. ll1JlPSI tPls 1130 1231 4271 4773 au 4121 6171 clly um11s 1211 34 4232 2277 4726 1177 1734 1x77 17M Creek• ' op.n tipecel 4211 1234 4129 1230 4229 /226 /279 177e LaMe Names Lakes 4234 4133 1276 4271 1777 4277+ 4131 /2]0 42]2 4131 1230 i 1232 L Parks 4133 4275 4233 Pa ela LJ 41K ale /771 �{ a 1131 4234 4733 4234 4237 1277 $ 1736 < 1127 4136 1178 1779 4240 4239 4278 4739 47tH 1179 41]1 4710 1741 4x40 4241 4746 4742 4747 4211 4247 4241 /247 4243 4717 /734 4234 1134 4115 4210 4242] 4734 1711 /734 4408 4246 x41 1310 '43oe 4216 4 1216 4z0e 1741 4110 1146 41�] NfO 1734 u0o s75o ale 4149 IIQD 1111 1l4e 1234 1734 ana6wn9iDeflo NIi 431) 4211 4707 4705 4"' 4701 4209 '201 4017 43410 x01 /101 /302 4303 4/0942105"031401, 43+s 4317 4309 1215 421] 111 1306 "Is 1111 lift 1109 1107 If0] 4105 1343 1001 4704 d 4307 4306 43V24300 JH17 4306 iS 431013De i<]0< alt 2220 <TOd 41011101 <1W all 1311 4310 3976 440842 x/400 1316 1311 4212 (Jil 4317 4113 97 1010 1001 4115 4215 470] 4315 1011 11006 1� x16 4309 4305 1701 4213 421111119 4705 4371 4707 40,d 1016 4314 471)1]11 3917 3409 4407 3405 4403 4401 /012 4020 4303 4753 1716 4+12 1100 4007 1140 1117 4170 101] 4101 4361 4160 4150 1015 iy 3405 4002 4\ 4188 41 T6 41642 1011 4/00 4004 4765 1194 1108 1)06 < 1+01 /433 106 1101 1109 1006 \ 1121 3410 \ � 10 k& 4135 .141 u. 1407 u12 4010 4317 x124210 IITt Nfo Nif 'Of, 4116 74 ` �.1 Niz 11/1 3417 3414 .dIFp 4116 V' 4201 ,�� 41111116 11311134 /106 3416 3417 ufa '009 M 3470 3419 b571� 1017110011\ \ 11 urN 17M 1501 1015 -1� PID:0702824430040 4306 Grimes Ave Edina, MN 55424 \w ,4203 1� G� a • '.'1j- IrJtPU41 A'St�� 1111111 Al City of Edina Legend 4213 4242 1313 — H.ghHUM.e Feature HOU.. Number Labels Street Name Label. ./ ay Limits 1345 1310 -_ - LO. Name. 1313 1318 4121 C PaHtc 4308 Parcel. 1219 Ipp 41 14 .9"KII.Sw q0 1301 13M 1313 4213 4309 4301 1311 1306 p 1310 1208 4206 4204 .202 1300 I 1113 4113 i 4313 1214 4313 - – ✓r64Eam N PID:0702824430040 a r, 4306 Grimes Ave >1 t� C V� w Edina, MN 55424 1��1LI/VP ^tt, n]Nn +' a2a� �».. `-•, +1 r. y 4200 4114 *ftp some n brit' M'17NWGSCIE RQ 4301 4215 4213 f • 4211 }�f *' •t= '. _ P °' ^ .��, a.ti � "� r rte: • �� s. r _�. .•�, itIk - , 2 aA d `YB �4 � r r • .y_ Y a` ! 1. '+-t ,• . ` yam_ - Sl a V1 0 w X7 Ma FD IF 75.0 909.1 .. o N PARCEL A 3 a I Q L 0 T Z M MM to W ( EXISTING HOUSE AND DRIVE NOT LOCATED ) T I N89'52'54 "E P.P. 25.15 906.3 74.90 IP I I 49.9 o PARCEL B o FD 0.35 FT. EAST I GAR. I M 74.90 0 75.0 N89'52'54 "E 1n Pnose RMW�.M1114. "° E NOINIMING COMPRNY, INC. MORNINGSIDE ROAD I FD IP 0.41 FT. NO. 906.- .2��EE D IP 0.28 FT. SO. 148.25 "X" IN SIDEWALK I I I EXISTING 1 CHURCH al I I 911.2 906.9 NORTH LINE OF LOT 2--\ S89'52'54 "W P.P. 148.35 904.5 NE COR. LOT EXCEPTION PARCEL C 2 rs--- 54 "E w Z o N O :w Q N N M MM to W C) L 0 T �ID P.P. 25.15 1 IP I I 49.9 FD IP 900.2 I I NCE FD 0.35 FT. EAST I GAR. I Pnose RMW�.M1114. "° E NOINIMING COMPRNY, INC. MORNINGSIDE ROAD I FD IP 0.41 FT. NO. 906.- .2��EE D IP 0.28 FT. SO. 148.25 "X" IN SIDEWALK I I I EXISTING 1 CHURCH al I I 911.2 906.9 NORTH LINE OF LOT 2--\ S89'52'54 "W P.P. 148.35 904.5 NE COR. LOT EXCEPTION PARCEL C 2 rs--- 54 "E w Z w :w Q N N M MM to W C) �I N �I S89'45'46 "W mm P.P 223.40 FD IP 0.56 FT. S0. I � I I I )DO SCALE : 1" = 30' ADDRESS: 4209 MORNINGSIDE ROAD PARCEL A AREA: 7,465 SQ.FT. PARCEL B AREA: 1,498 SQ.FT. PARCEL C AREA: 17,767 SQ.FT. 904.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION Legal Description: SEE ATTACHED SHEET 2 OF 2 xalEa. Cvm WT TIM nAn w I Al/All® raic AIED sT IR a um W 0MC' al WWa AM IMT I w A M&Y GREG MCCULLOUGH t1 &AIm umwvml um M CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1 WORD=py1IMllprw 5512. MN. E RD. /(,une[iY �A/L�iI— M"� ""• �s e LOT SPLIT 2 ... m. Exist INC tars Exist INC tars ----T MORNINGSIDE ROAD R nina'"i:+�wn'�wnas ENGINEERING CC mmy, INC. FD IP 0.41 FT. NO. 906.22 FD IP 0.28 FT. SO. 148.25 "X" IN SIDEWALK I I EXISTING 1 CHURCH a, I I SCALE : 1" = 30' ADDRESS: 4209 MORNINGSIDE ROAD PARCEL A AREA: 7,465 SQ.FT. PARCEL 8 AREA: 1,498 SQ.FT. PARCEL C AREA: 17,767 SQ.FT. I 904.o DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION EAST rrrrwco rat CREG McCULLOUGH 906.9 I F "D IP 75.0 909.1 Legal Description: S89'52'54 "W NORTH LINE OF LOT 2—N 148 5 I P.P. ::: 4 PARCEL A 3 NE COR. LOT o WN . MN. S �N� �"� sWe n n L 0 T o EXCEPTION N Z ( EXISTING HOUSE AND DRIVE "E NOT LOCATED ) Z N89'52'54 "E n I 9os.3 74.90 ai — — — — — FENCE o PARCEL B 4 M v) 75.0 \O� N89'52'S4 "E a 3 �r� V 0 N IO a L 0 Z T P. 11 25.15 FD IP qg,g FD IP FENCE FD 900.2 D.35 FT. EAST GAR. R nina'"i:+�wn'�wnas ENGINEERING CC mmy, INC. FD IP 0.41 FT. NO. 906.22 FD IP 0.28 FT. SO. 148.25 "X" IN SIDEWALK I I EXISTING 1 CHURCH a, I I SCALE : 1" = 30' ADDRESS: 4209 MORNINGSIDE ROAD PARCEL A AREA: 7,465 SQ.FT. PARCEL 8 AREA: 1,498 SQ.FT. PARCEL C AREA: 17,767 SQ.FT. I 904.o DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION PARCEL C � I • FENCE FD IP 9u) F0 IP 0.56 FT. 50. 30.00 i iao. axmr .wa ms rwI w r�supv sr r[ a T I rr oC[cr rr C.* I rrrrwco rat CREG McCULLOUGH 906.9 I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1 Legal Description: S89'52'54 "W NORTH LINE OF LOT 2—N 148 5 904.5 P.P. ::: 4 RD. SEE ATTACHED SHEET 2 OF 2 NE COR. LOT 2 WN . MN. S �N� �"� sWe s ... a.+ .Dwb EXCEPTION N wl "E N89'52'54 Z W W >Q M v) PARCEL C � I • FENCE FD IP 9u) F0 IP 0.56 FT. 50. 30.00 i iao. axmr .wa ms rwI w r�supv sr r[ a T I rr oC[cr rr C.* I rrrrwco rat CREG McCULLOUGH CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1 9Pa PN* RD. 2 WN . MN. S �N� �"� sWe LOT SPLIT ... a.+ .Dwb plopolel) LOTS EAST FD IP 75.0 909.1 FD PK 74.90 I MORNINGSIDE ROAD FD IP 0.41 FT. NO. 906..2 910.9 FD IP 0.28 FT. SO. 148.25 "X' IN SIDEWALK I I w PARCEL A 3 N °to EXISTING L b° O T 1 CHURCH N z EXISTING NOT LOCATED N) DRIVE N89'52'54 "E 9 6.3 74.90 J.`G' FENCE PARCEL B o 4.90 0 75.0 � ----N 89. <n o ro O � L 0 Z T v.°' 25.15 901.5 �FD IP 49.9 FO IP FENCE FD 900.21 0.35 FT, EAST GAR I I I P ROBE °° Aw PIE' NGINEERING COMPRNY, INC. ....T.� 906.9 NORTH LINE OF LOT 2--\ 589'52'54 "W 148. 5 NE COR. LOT EXCEPTION g PARCEL C 2 OFD W 0.56 FT. SO. I i "E 903.6 FD IP I I I SCALE : 1" = 30' ADDRESS: 4209 MORNINGSIDE ROAD PARCEL A AREA: 7,465 SQ.FT. PARCEL 8 AREA: 1,498 SQ.FT. PARCEL C AREA: 17,767 SQ.FT. I i 904.o DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION Legal Description: P.P. SEE ATTACHED SHEET 2 OF 2 w, Z w w Q �M w �I uip �E a M TNT 1M6 R/N 1w! MEPNED �a11: °� IO° wco n of a T I r acct "�-- -- �sana ao nar w •oar cAiEG McCULL0Ud1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1 �L Di�c�� ummmrw 5512 McG01RE RD. •••- ,�IJ><L-- M+A. MN. 55436 LOT SPLIT 2 ... ... EMA V ROBE O°r,B1 a m�a woo m�nctiue I COMPRNY, INC. ® Im FAST — S11dLT. K--M YM1 - 0 F PARCEL A EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4209 Momingside Road) The East 75.00 feet of the West 150.00 feet of Lot 1, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL B PROPOSED PROPERTY SPLIT DESCRIPTION (From 4306 Grimes Avenue to 4209 Morningside Road)) The North 20.00 feet of that part of the following described property: Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also excepting therefrom that part of said Lot 2 Which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet of Lot 2 and said tine there terminating Which lies westerly of the above described line. NEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4209 Morningside Road) The East 75.00 feet of the West 150.00 feet of Lot 1, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also the North 20.00 feet of Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Which lies westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet of Lot 2, and said line there terminating. EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4306 GRIMES AVENUE) Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also excepting therefrom that part of the North 20.00 feet of said Lot 2 Which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northerly line thereof, a distance of 148.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to the south line of said North 20.00 feet of Lot 2 and said line there terminating PARCEL C NEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (4306 GRIMES AVENUE) Lot 2, except the westerly 75.00 feet, GRIMES HOMESTEAD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also excepting therefrom all of the North 20.00 feet thereof. urtn F01: � . GREG McCl1LL000H CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 2 MINA. cG I E RD. PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS e-- ae� _ 2 `i `i4�.� ti- � 1 �i r.' + J ' y ` y ~' - � � r�' � � � ., `C t 3� r � . ���w v �` � •. '� �} �" i s - - ��;. c � I / _i -.- �� ` � N�� �.� =A -s,f i, ',r"'rTTT . i��et � iii P � y eS � yY-. ^t I` r .L __ _ - - - _ ,�. y. ti n - � � � - �� ._ �_ f'' . . .t �• �i v , d. To, Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: September 15, 2009 Subject: Final Plat to subdivide the lot at 5920 Oaklawn into two lots. Inf ormation/B ackground: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item IV.E Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution Ordinance Discussion On August 3, 2009, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat to divide this property into two lots. The applicant is .now requesting the Final Plat. There are no changes to the approved Preliminary Plat. Attached are the following documents: • The Final Plat • Resolution for City Council consideration. • Zoning Board of Appeals minutes. • The approved resolution for the Preliminary Plat. • The original Planning Commission report. FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That David Lucachick and Brenda Cole, mauled, Ise --:af lhe:following described property situate In the County of Hennepin, Slate of Minnesota, to wit: - Lot B, and Let 7, Block 14, FAIRFAX. Hew caused the soma to bar surveyed and platted as FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION -and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public fm public use forara the eassment.jor drain," and utility purposes as shom . an this pl,L.' In dtnesa .hereof said David Lue,chick and Brand, Code. have hereunto "eel their hands this _ day of - 200 — Signed: " David Lu ... hick Brand. Cole STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument r e acknodadg d before me this day of 200—, -_ by David L c-.hi k and Brenda Cole. mauled. Printed Signature ' Notary Public, County, My Co Marlon Eapbaa . I has y Cer"lyy INat'thie plat of FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION Is a .—act repreeanlallon of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and label. fly deelgn'led oa the plat: that all monumenle depicted. an the plot 'k— been or will be.c --Uy at within one: yea as Indicated an the plat;, that all wale boundarles and set lands ae of the data of the surwyaie certification ma shown and labeled on the plot; Thal all pub"' ways re shown and labeled on the plot. I further call ly that this plat was prepared by me or under my dbacl cuparvlsl,n and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor undo the lows o1 the Stoteof Minnesota- Jock Belk.. Land Surveyor Minn ... to LI.-.,NO. 20281 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF . The foregoing. eurwyor's certificate was ocknodedged before me this day of 200— by Jock Balks. Land Surveyor, Minnesota Llcanso Na 20281 printed - .Slgnalura' Notary Public; - - County,: My Commission. EAplree: EDINA, MINNESOTA This plat of FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION was approved. and. accepted by the City. Council of Edina. Mlnnasola at a regulor meeting thereof hold this day of 20D ' II' applicable, the- written comments and recommendation. of the Commissioner of Transportation ond the County Highway Engineer haw bean roc 1 e, by the City a the prescribed 30 day period hoe W.psad rllhout receipt or such comments and r— rarrendalbna, as provided by Minnesota StotutM Section 505.03, Subd. 2 CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA .DENOTES 1�? M 0Y 1. NCH UNIN YOMIYEM by: .Mayor by Yona9N - SET .0 �'"` "FD 0Y uCENSE NO 2 151 _ a DENOTES FOUIID 1 NOI Wp! MOIADENT TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT Hennepin CwntW Minnesota I hereby eartIfy.th,t loose payable N and prior years haw bean paid for land descrlbsd on this plat. Dated this day of 200— M L Al—, HannepN County Audit, by. Deputy T SURVEY DIVISION Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sea 383B.505 (1909), this plat has been approwd this day of 200— N William P. Brown, Hennepin County Surveyor by. W E COUNTY RECORDER - Hennepin County. Minnesota 1 hereby certify that the wIthln plat of FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION was filed In fhb office C lhls day of , 200— at _ o'clock — M. - J Michael H. Cunnlll, County Recorder by. . Deputy DRANADE AND LmUTY EA•CME.M ARE SHD.N TINS ( �s NOT TO SCALE BENC S FEET N MOM ANCO'eIG LOT UMES, UN1E5 OTHEXM INDICATED. AHD BFIN 110 FEET N WDM ADJW@JD RIGHT -OF -NAY LNE9. BEss —If SHOSaI ARE ASSI1MXD ( Lo LJ - � n>•.m .m rmu non - _ N897Y09'E. 134.10' — r----------- - - - -- 6 E yI - - - - Fr - -- K "----- G - - - --, . .. .L L--------- - - - - -- t CD IA ri m Sfd1E Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC N FEET CI.V)L' RNOINLRRIWO ANR LAN. X3.0 VRY G w9tN1r� o RESOLUTION NO. 2009-83 ay APPROVING A FINAL PLAT AT, 5920 OAKLAWN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City Of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND.- 1.01 Mr. David Lucachick and Ms. Brenda Cole are requesting a Final Plat to subdivide their existing property at 5920 Oaklawn into two lots.. 1.02 On August 3, 2009, the, City Council. granted Preliminary Plat, approval of this property. 1.03 The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the following Variances for the Plat on August 6, 2009: 1. Lot width variances. from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 2. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,710 and 6,707 square feet. 1.04 The Final Plat is the same as the Preliminary Plat. 1.05 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lots 6 and 7, Block 14 Fairfax, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.06 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels' (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Fairfax 2nd Addition. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the lot width and area Variances. 3. The Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved-by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Plat for the proposed subdivision of 5920 Oaklawn Avenue. Cityloval is subject to the following Conditions: 952- 927 -8861 480LWEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA,•MINNESOTA; 55424 -1394 WWW.cityofedina.com TTY 952-826-0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-83 Page Two 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina Engineering department. c. A survey showing existing and proposed contours. Drainage from the new home, garage and driveway needs to drain to Oaklawn Avenue, and not toward adjacent property. A curb must be installed on the north edge of Lot 1 and south edge of Lot 2 to contain water runoff. Final drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. The existing garage must be removed, and a building permit issued for a new 2 -car garage Lot 1. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 3. The building footprint for new homes on both Lots 1 and 2 shall be limited to a footprint of 1,864 square feet. Adopted this _ day of 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. y RESOLUTION NO. 21009-83 Page Two WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk ZB 8 -6 -2009 B-09 -9 Brenda Cole and David Lucachick 5920 Oaklawn Avenue, Edina Request: Lot Width and Lot Area Variances Planner Presentation ` Planner Teague informed the Board Mr. David Lucachick anc(Ms,' Brenda Cole�are proposing to subdivide their existing property at'S920 Oaklawn into two lots.'The existing home would remain, and a new home built on the new lot. The,existing detached garage and existing driveway would be removed from the site. The-following variances are required: Lot width variances from 75 feet-�o 50 feet for each lot; and Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,710 and 6,707. Planner Teague explained that both lots would gain access off Oa­klawn'Avenue. Within, this neighborhood, the median lot area is/6,699- square feet, median lot depth is 134 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet.;'The new)ots.would `meet the medians. Planner Teague reported to address-..staff concern over the size -of the proposed home compared to the neighborhood, the applicant agreed to reduce the building footprint to 1,864 square feet, when the City! Code would allow up to 2,013 square feet. A home with an 1,864 square foot footprint would have the largest - footprint in the neighborhood. The applicant intends to sellthe proposed new Iot.'Planner Teague further explained that the City Attorney advises'that the Zoning Board of Appeals must take action on variances associated with a subdivision, because the same ordinance standards appear in t e Zoning Ordinance as well as the Subdivision Ordinance. Planner'Teague concluded,that staff recommends approval of the lot width variances from,i5 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,77 and 610 square feet for the subdivision of 5920 Oaklawn. Approval is based on the foilpwing findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width, depth and area.A 3. The proposal meels'the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. The property owner owns adjoining lots on the block and without the benefit of a subdivision can't do what the neighboring property owners do with the same space. r Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The city must approve the final plat within,,,one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary.,approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the foilowirig .items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the'preliminary plat to,meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina Engineering department. C. A survey showing existing hand proposed contours.- Drainage from the new home, garage and driveway`rneeds to drain to Oaklawn Avenue, and not toward adjacent property ,A curb imust�be:installed on the north edge of Lot 1 and south edge of Lot 2 to contain water runoff. Final drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. The existing garage must,be removed, and a building permit issued for a new 2 -car garage Lot 1. ` e. //-Utility hook -ups are suo)ect to review of the city engineer. 3. The/building footprint for,new homes on both Lots 1 and 2 shall be limited to a footprint-of 1,864 - square feet., Annci�ina'fer the Annlinanf Mr. Lug chick and Ms. Cole ; Board Actions ' A brief discussion ensued with Board Members in agreement that the platting of this neighborhood occurred \before the Ordinance change in lot width and area. Member Vasaly moved variance approval for B-09 -9 based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions, noting that what is proposed would not disrupt the existing neighborhood with the agreement that the building footprint for both Lots 1 and 2 be limited to 1,864 square feet. Member Hornig seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. pPEWOOSO OP9N O w9zA, ew e v� RESOLUTION NO. 2009-72 Jay PROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 5920 OAKLAWN INTO TWO LOTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City Of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mr. David Lucachick and Ms. Brenda Cole are requesting a Preliminary Plat to subdivide their existing property at 5920 Oaklawn into two lots. Additionally, the following variances are required: 1. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 2. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,710 and 6,707 square feet. Preliminary Plat approval is conitioned upon approval of the variances prior to consideration of final plat approval. 1.02 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lots 6 and 7, Block 14 Fairfax, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels') described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Fairfax 2nd Addition. 1.04 On July 1, 2009, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat on a Vote of 8 -1. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width, depth and area. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every !Qt an the hlnrlr The propgged Subdivision- 111d ,- o111t in t1vo lots Mora City Hall characteristic of the neighborhood. AX 952- 26-039 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-72 Page Two c. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. The property owner owns a lot that was originally platted as two lots on the block, and without the benefit of a subdivision, can't do what the neighboring property owners do with the same space. f. The City approved a small lot subdivision in the 5900 block of Ewing & France, subject to the condition that building footprints, setbacks and building height be consistent with existing homes in the neighborhood. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Plat for the proposed subdivision of 5920 Oaklawn Avenue. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina Engineering department. c. A survey showing existing and proposed contours. Drainage from the new home, garage and driveway needs to drain to Oaklawn Avenue, and not toward adjacent property. A curb must be installed on the north edge of Lot 1 and south edge of Lot 2 to contain water runoff. Final drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. The existing garage must be removed, and a building permit issued for a new 2 -car garage Lot 1. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 3. The building footprint for new homes on both Lots 1 and 2 shall be limited to a footprint of 1,864 square feet. 4. The variances must be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Adopted this — day of 2009. R-tSOLUTION NO. 2009-72 Page Two ATTEST: Debra A. Marigen,, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk. ok e t4 in �J � �o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 1, 2009 2009.005.09a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. David Lucachick and Ms. Brenda Cole are proposing to subdivide their existing property at 5920 Oaklawn into two lots. The existing home would remain, and a new home built on the new lot. The existing detached garage and existing driveway would be removed from the site. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5 —A10.) The following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,710 and 6,707 square feet. Both lots would gain access off Oaklawn Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,699 square feet, median lot depth is 134 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. (See attached median calculations on pages A11- Al2.) The new lots would meet the medians. To address staff concern over the size of the proposed home compared to the neighborhood, the applicant agreed to reduce the building footprint to 1,864 square feet, when the City Code would allow up to 2,013 square feet. A home with an 1,864 square foot footprint would have the larges footprint in the neighborhood. (See page A15.) The applicant intends to sell the proposed new lot. Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low - density residential. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single - family home and detached garage. (See pages A3 and A4.) The detached garage would be removed and a new detached garage built on Lot 1. (See page A9.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single- dwelling district * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and submitted comment. (See page A18.) Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house are reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to Oaklawn Avenue. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. Primary Issue Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed four lot subdivision is reasonable for three reasons: The proposed lot areas, lot widths and lot depths would be consistent with the original plat and every lot on this block. (See the original plat and 2 Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,000 s.f. 75 ft 134 ft Lot 1 6,707 s.f.* 50 ft* 134 ft Lot 2 6,710 s.f.* 50 ft* 134 ft * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and submitted comment. (See page A18.) Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house are reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to Oaklawn Avenue. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. Primary Issue Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed four lot subdivision is reasonable for three reasons: The proposed lot areas, lot widths and lot depths would be consistent with the original plat and every lot on this block. (See the original plat and 2 current lot configurations'on pages Al —A2, A4a, and A13— /A14.) Most lots are 50 feet wide and 1,34 feet deep as proposed. 2. Reduced building footprint.;The,applicant proposes to sell the lot with a restriction that would require a slightly smaller footprint than the maximum allowed standard to try and better fit -the character of the neighborhood. (See page Al and Al5.) Proposed building coverage would be 28 percent.. The maximum allowable. coverage.is 30 percent. Staff would recommend these as conditions of any approval of this subdivision. As a comparison, staff calculated building coverage and number of stories of the homes in the areei "(See page A14.) The proposed home and garage would still have a larger footprint than any home and garage on the block. (See page .Al5.) 3. The proposal meets the findings for a variance. Per Section 810.05.Subd.1, of the subdivision ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause. undue hardship. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the variance criteria: a) The hardship is not.a mere inconvenience; and is due to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical condition of the land. The hardship is due to the fact that the subject property is double the size of all lots on this block. This area was originally plated with 50 -foot lots, including the subject property. (See page A4a.) The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision .would result in.two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood and original plat. 'If `the variances were denied, the. applicant would be denied a subdivision of his property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area. As demonstrated on pages.Al1 —Al 2, -the median lot size in this neighborhood is 50 feet wide, 134 feet deep and 6,699 square feet in size. The proposed lots would be 50 feet wide, 134 feet deep and 6,707 and'6,710 square feet in size. b) The conditioWbi conditions upon which the request for. a. variance is .. based are unique to the property being platted or subdivided and 3 not generally applicable to other property. The hardship is caused by this Section and not by the applicant. The condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to the Oaklawn area. (See page A2.) Most lots are 50 feet wide. Every lot on this block is 50 feet wide, with the exception of the subject lot. The applicant did not combine the original lots. d) The variance will result in an improved plat or subdivision. The variance will result in an improved plat with single - family homes built on each lot. c) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the land within the plat or subdivision or the neighborhood? No. Given the sizes of other lots in the area, the variances would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The resulting lots would be the same size every other lot on this block. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the two lot subdivision of 5920 Oaklawn Avenue with the lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 7,707 and 7,710 square feet. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width, depth and area. 3. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. 4 C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application'for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be "void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina Engineering department. C. A survey showing existing and proposed contours. Drainage from the new home, garage and driveway needs to drain to Oaklawn Avenue, and not toward adjacent property. A curb must be installed on the north edge of Lot 1 and south edge of Lot 2 to contain water runoff. Final drainage plans are subject to review, and approval'of the city engineer. d. The existing garage must be removed, and a building permit issued for a new 2 -car garage Lot 1. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 3. The building footprint of the new home on Lot 2 shall be limited to a footprint of 1,864 square feet. 5 City of Edina 3711 57N 3711 5720 3725 5724 3713 3751 Il42814424 "20144161441214408144&6 I4400 143281 3241 204316.11. (N1 5901 5900 91TH S7 w 6800 �— S1D0 5905 5801 50 5&01 5800 40 5805 5801 SBOS +601 1 5805 3903 5} 80 SBOS 3800 SW/ r 5801 5005 3100 Sd04 3801 +805 5&097- 58oe 5408 5801 6817 SB12 SR/J 908 5109 $113 Sa08 6811 3112 5908 3808 5801 5912 Sdpg r 5809 581] 5817 58th �k 5817 }2 5821 5820 5821 SB10 5913 3117 5821 5816 5916 5816 5820 916 5116 5817 682} 3017 501 5870 $821 ,820 5825 5824 5825 5828 SdN sd29 6676 5173 5872 5837 5822 5877 5836 5877 5876 A 5425 5829 5823 3817 58T8 3631 5836 5911 5923 5&18 5821 5828 5632 Sd36 5921 JW2"5121 5618 5832 SAO- 3823 r� S1N 3037 5924 S1N 5877 5837 Sd37 5611 5610 SQ1 Sl10 5111 5:80 5929 5828 5110 SNf 5933 3 5 Us 5811 5845 5544 5933 St t3 SOM 5933 5972 SM4 5936 1 926 5185 5936 J 6033 14s18 l 4510 Naeoe! �+wM�116 Cm.�aet[1.0(.Y O D �S �r 1. PID:1902824420103 5920 Oaklawn Ave Edina, MN 55424 A( M I Pam.1, °4 rc�*,_ 0 N �•'��h111'OItAKt� �, Legend Highlighted Feature House Number Labels Street Name labels .! City Limits /� Creeks Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels 39TH Srw 5901 5900 900 5801 6800 se0i 5908 5905 6901 901 3903 3904 5906 5904 5988 908 5808 3908 5909 5908 5917 5917 B/2 5013 5012 5913 5912 17 5916 916 9917 16 5917 5916 5920 920 5821 5920 5911 5925 5921 JW2"5121 921 5923 5924 5923 3920 B1d 5929 5828 59N 3928 5933 28 5972 5933 5932 5933 5972 5937 5936 926 593 5936 5937 5936 3910 5910 3911 3410 3911 33911 5915 39H p h 69113 5944 e9n1 sr w 6600 A 6001 6000 6001 6001 6000 6001 6000 6001 6005 6001 0005 6005 0001 6008 6008 69/T 6617 60126009 6006 eon 8016 6017 6016 V 6026 6611 6026 6077 6016021 60N 6024 t6029W2' 6017 6016 W29 6DN 6029 6026 6037 6072 2 6077 6021 6030 6077 6bM 6037 /ON 24 6025 8Wl 0010 8078 6M 9015 so" 6641 6626 613797w J 6033 14s18 l 4510 Naeoe! �+wM�116 Cm.�aet[1.0(.Y O D �S �r 1. PID:1902824420103 5920 Oaklawn Ave Edina, MN 55424 A( M I Pam.1, °4 rc�*,_ 0 N �•'��h111'OItAKt� �, Legend Highlighted Feature House Number Labels Street Name labels .! City Limits /� Creeks Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels �3 A� F 9 3� tn+ R x 11.1 I541 1 1e91 1]51 1f361 sn 11691 x �ssl R r S 11.e1 113]1 R 11N1 �r 1561 x • x R Iva 3 1W1681 faej Y f�' R (1 14.1 S (U 501 R Q .5 (63 .a. S (W X61' S R tiS.N� S le]1 S R 59TH ST W 119!1 ,� n x •l]il i 1 It201 1 11991 R 'a » x IN1 1151 x 11191 1x13211 R R (95) x 1/111 x (16.1 S 1 S �n.' R 191 �n.' A (77) .1x11111 It.tl S 1(42) S 1(WI x ON Y (ne) A Y ma (921 1x1911 tna R 191 11151 x ItW) S , 19% x M) 1e 11 IIt21 Itt31 It.l, .vas tnv 1e9� R .au lul R .vs It lx) 1]111it, It DS) W) x IP) amsl x R lei! I6i1 x p1.1 (lm) .a ai m c� S iv e. rr si S 1 R , INI 1651 R � (1091 It.el r 9 60TH ST W lxq lN) x 1x71 x 1151 (6) A ova . 1361 �lte)va A R � �vr A , IA .v]t n.a R ,r •... • R ' fx51 Y 1171 � R Y 121) Itel 1 !el S R LtJ r tv r r ,. > R .c n A Y 131 R Q 11x11 It>n . i. S (22j) (201 1(2) x A � i• 121) r It1 R x .. . (I23. r S » (122) Y w : Y r R .nM ,• r A ra r' • ` ' A A „ R 1 rs t• R .s R o 12 A N.1 /2 SE. 114 SEC. 19 T.028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. 200 400 Feet Print Date: Fri Jul 12 08:38:15 200 S /NW /19 SINE /19 S /NWI N /SW/ 19 N /SW/ S /SW /19 S /SE /19 SISWI 0 a 0 Eig t uarter Section .nul Etw L APPLICANT NARRATIVE 5920 OAKLAWN LOTS 6 & 7, FAIRFAX Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a preliminary plat. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which had not been subdivided to a size similar to the other lots in the neighborhood. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two properties more characteristic of the neighborhood. c. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. Mr. Lucachick said his intent is to sell the unjoined lot and the house property, not develop them. The proposed variance will: Relieve an undue hardship which was not Self - imposed or a mere inconvenience. The original parcel (of which the subject is the remainder) was platted and has been diminished in the past with the sale of lot 8 when a new house was built on that lot in 1969. The current size of the subject parcel (and lot 8 as well) was due to a decision made in prior decades to keep the subject parcel virtually equal in size with any other two lots of the adjacent subdivisions, allowing unjoining, subdivision or platting at a later date. The logic would follow that when the subject was platted, there would be two lots of equal size, similar in width and depth to the adjacent parcels. There is no other property on the subject property's block that was not constructed on a 50 foot lot. The size of the parcel is unique in the neighborhood and is twice the size of any other on the block. Since many decades have passed since the original Fairfax platting, the City of Edina zoning requirements were changed to the current requirements, the subject parcel's historical configuration no longer complies with the minimum lot area and minimum lot width for two lots. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The home on the subject parcel was constructed in 1929. It may be preserved, depending on the buyer of that parcel. The guest house was removed from the other parcel around A5- the year 2000 and could have made the parcel eligible for separation/unjoining instead of subdivision. The current owner removed it to remedy a neighborhood eyesore. The parcel also has sewer and water stubs in the street indicating intent if not expenses for being two parcels dating from when water and sewer were provided in 1951 following the new code requirements for minimum lot sizes. The size of the parcel is unique in the neighborhood and is twice the size of any single parcel on its block. The parcel is conforming as it is, however, this was never the intent of the original platting or how the utilities were put into the street. Also, any house built on such a large lot would likely be oversized in the neighborhood. Unjoining the parcel would more likely result in new construction conforming to the sizes of the surrounding residences. Preserve substantial property rights possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. The proposed unjoining results in two lots of equal size with others on the block and in the niehhborhood. The unjoining mimics the existing neighborhood lot scheme and scale. Presumably, the new construction will be similarly scaled for the neighborhood and will be more affordable than a single lot configuration. The zoning district is single family and is benefited fron the single family nature of the likely construction. Not to be materially detrimental to the public ivelfarde or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The proposed unjoining comports with the surrounding lots. As a single lot it would result in a lot that is twice the size of the surrounding properties and would likely result in a house out of scale with the neighborhood that would more likely be injurious to the adjacent lot owners. C� %1r"v► ` � N1AY 7 7 2009 r' r" Oe 8 Al 1) m 0 5 a' LYJ s s 3 SITE MAP (NTS) si Y SITE Y PROPOSED EASEMENT DATA Aa zra uRlD EAmd14 HL saw ss14 II �gTL A�,MO.o Im u slow w na° rspAr� sR°iiILST'�iAu' NOTES 1. CONFIRM EMM UTNTIES AND TREE LOCATION PRIM M FINAL HOUSE DE GN. 2. FINAL SITE A OR NO PLAN 10 BE APPROV4D OV tlTY. STE SPE.FIC EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES AND SE°IENONO TO E ADORE55E0 AT THAT TIME, V ® PROPERTY ADDRESS PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 592D oAHLARN AVENUE. EDINA. UN 55.]' LEG LEG& DESCRIPTION: sC NORTH P,LD. IS- D2A -2A- 2 -13105 7. /C AND AIR AX 2N® ADDITION � EDDRD[D PLAT 1HEREDE. HEWN RN COUNTY. YMNESOTA scar «an S1TE DATA; IMSTINO ZDIGNO - RESIDENTIAL 00 PARCEL AREA = 0.30 ACRES LEOEND EIDSTNG LOTS - ] TOTAL PROPOSED LOTS - ] ----- ---- ------- la>9wD COI,uR --- _--- no-------- sa IY mrmw SETBACKS —�• -� •E�® �M PRWCN'AL FRONT: 30' (OR AVSRAGE OF ADJACENT HOMES) • I I — s,o ---- 'ev ®,d ,v„un STRUCTURE SIDE: 5' • �� DETACHED smE: Y GARAGE EM: 7 r -' - p°""''a "1A0' LOT REQUIREMENTS: A mT ina 'Y SINGLE 0' NV NEIGHBORHOOD —, -- pNnErO sal. IIW° MEET 500' NDGHB AND AU AVFAAGE OF WIDTH. RAGE AND AREA. I 1 I .� P«YDII➢ sal YWFR BIOG. COVERAGE - 30K V I I I — LOT TABULATION LLZJ L - NBB72'09'E _ ----- L 134.10 _ _ _ _ _ /I 11 �y }'111 I mT iDp°°cz¢ z COT 1 s�si L ,•I E 1 i �_� it • ",� I 1 le OWNER/APPL(CANT.' G.n.re 1 ` m DAVID LUCACHICN f oA0. /� m7i� I I 5920 OAKLAWN AVENUE '- GVF uf11m - I EDINA, MN 55424 —a •r g S (952) 922.6310 oY 'gg% a ENGINEER I 1 i ANDERSON ENG04EFRING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13605 1ST AVE N. SUITE 100 LOT 2 " I PAEA¢ L' 1 w' LO 1 r . 1 � 'qG' 1 I !-1 MI^` (L' PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 zw v \ -• 1 i, (((''��� A�/ {{y��(z))) F V MIKE BRANDVOLD- P.E. cAEACE �_____y____ a (763) 412 -4000 n 134.25 • ' I 13WELUUC ..- .- . - -�... . -... ._ I. IAC® I Li 56922'09'W i IN , SURVEYOR «u ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13605 AVE UITE I 00 ---- -- -- - - -- m iTE,Ix m . -_ . -..._ n •-- ) PLYMOUTH. TH. MN N 55 441 JACK BOLKE (763) 412 -4000 —� — — — — — — — — I srlE.0 Yc I INDIX I I 2ffEj DESCRIPTION 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 PREUMINARY STE, GRADING B UTILITY - EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PLOTI D Anders on Engineering of Minnesota, LLC FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION AYNG NO, .E R I N D. N 0 N D EDINA, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT DAVE LUCACHICK 1 of 2 DA,E U[MS[ P • ,� m 1»s1 «x -am r•s I.YI nx -mmn Py0 _axr�TUnox P �o �•� v TD9L• • • •• P ^TON PRFVENTON PI eN e�� a e� TAt AnON ee Ax1FNAx 3 Q0 C n 3 a z 0 u a s e2uxG ' Gx Aft rM1as� _lam Le ii.�_ —DLO ` GARAGE - -- se � >_ GARxGE ow1b r -1 T[mti�tm ITmrxl RNa- , 1 � III 1 •F -� Ir I �I a -- - 711 II d'I � I i ;•I�i � 13 1 ]W jM1 /Iem9 I III I... °I II�� Q � T.N.H.. BRL90 I l l l I i 1 I 1� 'If yy P 1 ara; men IwTTRRaw u� 1 rl ....e...e .t .eve R Iromu 1 POSammH 7 olamrn rNma Kl d Std -_ l � 541 /• t-' xC1 evMM xm nwc�maMi Pwpar' �rt eve of erm rmn rm mars TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE Ireml es w•e •em N.xxmmTr nrenl» !M-1K Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC PMxr RA _LA MR,HAD �1 osmMGVOU,P j/ M IYIL ENGiNCERING A.. LAND UR V Er c 9n1Am L—�7� uS,I.r�Yf I INVa xDxlelxRTx. veI DATE _ Y DIOR 4 1 TR lin, . - NORTH LEGEND - ______ ------- E1awn l9 TnITO1 —_.— nIm® mIRe1 male -- PItV® IY m,i9W D.B . Tn1,a R nla T9 t vINTAID LO nv® Anam Rut NOTE & 1. CONnRY EIBSTMG UTUTES AND TREE LOCATON PRIOR To .-. HOUSE DESIGN. 1 TINAL SITE • GRADING RAN TO BE APPROVED BT Ott. SEE SPECBIC ERDSON CDNTRDL PRACTICES AND SEOUENEMG TO BE AODRESYD AT THAT D.E. 1 ONNER TO CONTIRD SIE AND TYPE Q RETAIMNG WALL BLOCRS/BOIAOERS AT TIME or BUEDMG PERMIT APPUCATON. 4. AMR BUADINGGPERMIT APPROVAL 5, ] 5. BENUNARN TOP NUT Di HYDRANT El£VADo.. BB1.9D. Fv�� FAIRFAX 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY GRADING & RA9R5 NO EDINA, MINNESOTA UTILITY PLAN DAVE LUCACHICK 2 of 2 I I ' I I 60.00 �p RETAINING \ 1 I I I I 0 I T 41 WALL I CE I \ ,1 I I y SILT FEN I DWELLING - - -- - 34.x, -�- I m �g I )// —SIr �e91 G — — — f — ' a , u PROP n , 4x ! ! III ^� ...� C�= ° PROPOSED it —�+w 1■ \ I SI • SILT FENCE/ ° GARAGE a a�w I �• I �I BIO -LOGS ■ FF =892.1 I WATER SER. n 09 I ♦ < / I ! ZoA 0 r.� IIII _J u -< / III I I lc FIX a6 F,. - °,G — 'J■ d REMOVE/REDO I I I I i �,' -I T.N.H. = 881.90 WES, OF LKE °... . j2 c _ / ; L1 --' LANDSCAPE / GARAGE .' R — aNW PAVER— Wux } GAR , o' — 890 x� I I I I /3- 4"� 9 \ i lee a A f & � RIM: 880 N / 4' CONt;. WIpJ I I ! I ° I v 1:873.99 - REMOVE. SOt�C o < II :.-.GONG. FOLIIJDA710N WAiFA SER. v / I —PROPO 1 HOUSE �S �4 :• '' 1 , ' N 2° CU W t I i � CONNECT Ex. PVC 869_ I FF =892.0 > > T/ Z, > o r — _ / 11 SEW/WAT STUBS I LO-88&5 �� I I m I WITH 1 1 /2° CU y� 77777/ I . B =882.0 i / SAM,ART m ° "� II WATER ZE 6° PVC 1$ i I PGA SEED _ - LO (w � — , s;ER : I U II SAN (MIN 1%} ■ OFF =889.3 � � �— _6ea� 4.4. .� I L GARAGE ■ sae, —7X —'I — ;137[ �+ PR. .. OR ILUF -FENCE °-a'2 SILT FENCE/ / I I Iz MAINTAIN CORNER o.e / I' S EXIST. DRIVE ON LWE WALL 0.4 FT. BIO -LOGS / I GARAGE 1' -20 WALL Sour+ of uNE - ----- 39.65 --- - - - - -7 I I I� I� ACCESS I DWELLING i I i - REROUTE OVERHEAD I I ELEC /TELE AS 1• -2' WALL IW NECESSARY (TYPICAL). 6a.00 - -- ---- -- - - - - -1 I CONSTRUCTION I ENTRANCE AT TIME OF HOME CONSTRUCTION i II n T LJ C L- L. I (134.09 PER PLAT) �LLI - - - - - - - 34.71 -- - - - - - ' I 1 _ N89'22'09 "E - - 134.10 _4.52 III - - - - - - - - — - - - - -- - 3' GARAGE — — — p — —, . " ' I III SETBACK I °Nw !� V — — ca4c. — — — — — TYPICAL PROPOSED GARAGE �w \/ / 1 GAS — Q 528 5F ONw J N II - � �� ---- -- 33.13 - -- -- 7 O Z // O WA SER. LOT I Vf I L. I ¢� z;u I I FEN. 06 R. - 6.6A �- I• I— J ` ; n _< T %EST OF LINE - -� / u SANITARY -' II 2 SEWER SER. _ REMOVE GAR. coNC oNW % ,• — m II GARAGE -�L _ _ e — Pig -TI GARAGE L EI —OO �- d , �7 O :'REMOVE.'0' 4'H 4' .CONC. FOUNDAPON d — -� O O 12• PROPOSED S TER g0. O HOUSE �, 1.384 SF - 77777/ PROPOSED L I / 39.1' S5 I g°s II GARAGE , 44 LO I l- — 3 Q GARAGE 48O \�-------- - - - --t —\ - -T I a 24 — — — Q --- - - - - -- c -- - - -��- � Q ` -FENCE /�. _ -6.42 CORNER (134.06 PER PLAT) Os I= MAIN'. CRI LINE / WALL 0.4 FT. EXIST GARAGE 134.25 S89'22'09 "W DWELLING - - - - - - -- 39.ss - - - - -- Im Q ACCE .JT I15 v n t� 3' GARAGE EAST LIN OF-- x '' I� I SETBACK r - - TYPICAL n T 1 _-- --- --- -- - -- -- AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK LINE l i i i • 000 - - - -' 4 • w s+ p = s sq• w m m � w if m m 74 w m o s e• m ffi u m 40 M m a •{ as m m o I ffi I - - -•r o m am s I I m I ffi w w I _ o I I F - - ea a m s v I I .1 •Toe -1 - - ,•• - - - -� F- - m m mm a BS n m a mm •o a w so � a wt w •1 4• em ss ffi a w w i• 4• so w m m � w Ma✓�� •• A N W:.. E S A if m m 74 w m o s e• m ffi m m 40 M m a M3 o I I � -- - - - + - - - - I I I I� I - - -•r m am s I I I I I ® •IIL I `II I F---- iJ - - - - Imo% I - -- I I I I _ I I F - - ea a a v I I .1 •Toe -1 - - ,•• - - - -� F- - S "•__500 FT RADIUS 2 m mm BS M m mm •o a w � wt w Ma✓�� •• A N W:.. E S A if m m 74 w m m. s 76 ffi m m 10 .e • ® a MpY 2 2 20'3 S.., ; Q M 0 . 100 200 km md SCALE IN 0) FEET Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G A N D L A N D S U R V E Y I N G 13805 1ST AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 100, PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 TEL (783) 412 -4000 FAX (783) 412 -4080 ® me• w s x •ffi ®®l - I I I � -- - - - + - - - - I I I I� I - - -•r I I I I I I `II I F---- iJ - - - - Imo% I - -- I I I I _ I I F - - -- v I I .1 •Toe -1 - - ,•• - - - -� F- - S "•__500 FT RADIUS 2 MpY 2 2 20'3 S.., ; Q M 0 . 100 200 km md SCALE IN 0) FEET Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G A N D L A N D S U R V E Y I N G 13805 1ST AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 100, PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 TEL (783) 412 -4000 FAX (783) 412 -4080 NEWSORHOOD ANALYSIS FOR 5920 OAKLAWN AVENUE, EDINA MINNESOTA REF NUMBER HOUSE NUMBER STREET NAME LOT WIDTH FEET LOT DEPTH FEET LOT AREA 5O FT - OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION , 1 5841 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.7 6,634 P M AND D G MERRIGAN LOT 14, BLOCK 4' 2 5845 WOODDALE AVE SOD 132.7 6,633 CHRISTINE M MADIGAN LOT 13, BLOCK 4 3 5836 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.7 6,635 M E 6 P F HENRY LOT 10, SLOCK4 4 5840 KELLOGG AVE 50 -0 132.7 69635 WAYNE W DVORAK TRUSTEE LOT 11, BLOCK 4 5 5864 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.7 6.633 C W 8 5 J MOBERG LOT 12, BLOCK 4 8 1 5829 KELLOGG AVE 75.0 1342 MASS ROSS R PHERNETTON ET AL LOT 17 AND N 12 OF LOT 16 7 5837 KELLOGG AVE 75.0 1342 _ 10,081 R G 8 J M COWAN LOT 15 AND S 12 OF LOT 1Q BLOCK 3 8 5845 KELLOGG AVE 100.0 134.2 13,416 H 8 Y d H KIN LOTS 13 AND 11, BLOCK 3 9 5832 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1342 6.710 MARY L DICK LOT 9, BLOCK 3 10 5836 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1342 8,710 MARLENE J SCHLEIMER TRUSTEE LOT 10, BLOCK 3 11 5840 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1342 69709 VIKTOR JEGERS LOT 11, BLOCK 3 12 13 5844 5833 OAKLAWN AVE OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 60.0 1342 1342 6,708 8,052 ANDREW D BESON PATRICK D REGAN LOT 12, BLOCK 3 LOT 16 AND 5 10 FT OF LOT17, BLOCK 2 14 5837 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1342 6,709 JEAN M MITCHELL LOT 15, BLOCK 2 15 5841 OAKLAWN AVE 108.5 1342 14,557 MAYNARD R SANDBERG LOTS 13 AND 14 INCL ADJ 12 OF STREET VACATED, BLOCK 2 18 5838 BROOKVIEW AVE 50.0 1342 6,709 TURN KEY CONSTRUCT FIN LLC LOT 10, BLOCK 2 17 5840 BROOKVIEW AVE 50.0 1342 64709 ROBERT M BRAUN LOT 11, BLOCK 2 18 5844 BROOKVIEW AVE 50.0 1342 69708 R N e l L BERGREN TR LOT 12, BLOCK 2 19 5845 BROOKVIEW AVE 65.0 1342 8,720 T L 8 L A SULLIVAN LOT 13, BLOCK 1 20 5901 OAKLAWN AVE 57.0 134.1 7,646 CAROL LEARN LOT 24, INCL ADJ 112 OF STREET VACATED, BLOCK 14 21 5905 OAKLAWN AVE 62.7 134.1 8,407 D O AMUNDSON ETAL LOT 23 AND N 20 FT OF W 85 FT LOT 2Z BLOCK 22 22 5901 WOODDALE AVE 48.6 132.6 6,447 DAN SC14WARTZ LOT 24, BLOCK 13 23 5905 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.6 6,632 PETER T FOLEY 11 LOT 23, BLOCK 13 24 5909 WOODDALE AVE 500 132.6 6,631 ANGELA M BREWER LOT ZZ BLOCK 13 25 5913 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.6 6,630 IRMA F CONROY LOT 21, BLOCK 13 26 5917 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 1 132.6 6.630 JOANNE HOLMES/STEVE SWANSON LOT 20, BLOCK 13 27 5921 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.6 1 6,629 DOROTHY M BUSCH LOT 19, BLOCK 13 28 5925 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.6 6,628 DAVID A 6 TUL K SMYTHE LOT 18, BLOCK 13 29 5929 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.6 028 CYNTHIA MACDONALD LOT 17, BLOCK 13 30 5933 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.5 6,627 J M 8 J A MATHIS LOT 16, BLOCK 13 31 5937 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.5 6,627 J R 8 V L SCHEDW LOT 15, BLOCK 13 32 5941 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 132.5 6,626 LUKE HELLIER ET AL LOT 14, BLOCK 13 33 5945 WOODDALE AVE 50.0 1325 6,625 EO TRST CO FBO D PEARSON IRA LOT 13, BLOCK 13 34 5900 KELLOGG AVE 48.6 1328 6.442 5 M 8 K R METZ LOT 1, BLOCK 13 35 5904 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6,632 ALLEN 0 CAVELL LOT Z BLOCK 13 36 5908 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6,631 A C ELIZABETH 6 P A ENGLUND LOT 3, BLOCK 13 37 5912 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 8,830 ANN CLAIRE THOMPSON LOT 4, BLOCK 13 38 5916 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6.630 M L 8 H L SCOTT LOT 5, BLOCK 13 39 5920 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132A 6,629 C GURON 8 K KAUR LOT 6, BLOCK 13 40 5924 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6.629 HOOSHANG MEHRALUW LOT 7, BLOCK 13 41 5928 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.6 6,628 M 6 J GENTRY LOT 8. BLOCK 13 42 5932 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6,627 DEBRORAH RENGWELSKI LOT 9, BLOCK 13 43 5936 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6.627 A D 6 C A DAMAN LOT 10, BLOCK 13 µ 5940 KELLOGG OGG AVE 50,0 132.5 SI626 WALTER H OLSON ET AL LOT 11, BLOCK 13 45 5944 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 132.5 6,625 SOLVEIG MARIE NORSTOG LOT 12. BLOCK 13 46 5901 KELLOGG AVE 46.5 134.1 6,509 S 8 C FISHER LOT 24, BLOCK 14 47 5905 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,707 JOHN WILLIAM BRANTZ TRUSTEE LOT 23, BLOCK 14 48 5909 KELLOGG AVE SOD 134.1 6,708 GLORIA 0 LEE LOT 22, BLOCK 14 49 5913 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,705 L 8 H SORGEN LOT 21, BLOCK 14 50 5917 KELLOGG AVE 50,0 134,1 8,705 N P 8 K B NELSON LOT 20, BLOCK 14 51 5921 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,704 P R KRIDER & S J WEGMANN LOT 19, BLOCK 14 52 5925 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,703 L A FERRELL ET AL LOT 18, BLOCK 14 53 5928 KELLOGG OGG AVE 50.0 134.1 6,703 MARY M BRAUN TRUSTEE LOT 17, BLOCK 14 54 5933 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,702 JAMES D GUSE LOT 16, BLOCK 14 55 5937 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,702 TIMO V JUUJARVI ETAL LOT 15, BLOCK 14 56 5941 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,701 STACY A BARSHAP LOT 14, BLOCK 14 57 5945 KELLOGG AVE 50.0 134.0 6,700 IDELLE J A 8 CARL W SHANNON LOT 13, BLOCK 14 58 59W OAKLAWN AVE 48.5 134.1 6,505 J S 8 S M AURA LOT 1, BLOCK 14 59 5904 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6,707 BRUCE J 8 ANNE 5 PARKER LOT 2, BLOCK 14 60 5908 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6.706 IDEAL APARTMENTS LLC LOT 3, BLOCK 14 61 5912 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6.705 P M 6 E B KAISER LOT 4, BLOCK 14 62 5916 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6.705 NELLA S ALLEN LOT 5, BLOCK 14 63 5928 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.1 6,703 JOHN T ERICSON LOT 8, BLOCK 14 64 5932 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,702 AMY MAUREEN SONDE LOT 9, BLOCK 14 65 5936 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,702 R M B 8 J F KELLEY LOT 10, BLOCK 14 66 5940 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 134.0 6,701 M H GLEASON 8 R C PENDLETON LOT 11, BLOCK 14 67 5944 OAKLAWN AVE 50.D 134.0 6,700 J T 8 D E ARNOLD LOT 12, BLOCK 14 88 8001 WOODDALE AVE 62.6 132.5 8.298 S F BRADFORD 8 M 5 FRANSSEN LOT 24 AND N 14 FT OF LOT 23. BLOCK 20 69 6005 WOODDALE AVE 62.0 132.5 8,213 RACHEL SZYMANSKI N 26 FT OF LOT 22 AND 5 36 FT OF LOT 23, BLOCK 20 70 6DOD KELLOGG AVE 48.6 132.5 5,433 N L DUIN 8 C L MAGOZZI -OUIN LOT 1, BLOCK 20 KELLOGG AS 132.5 6,624 JESSE MARTIN LOT 2, BLOCK 20 6008 KELLOGG A132.7 6,633 S R BREIDENSACH LOT 3, BLOCK 20 6001 KELLOGG A134.0 6,501 PATRICK S CONLON LOT 24, BLOCK 19 6005 KELLOGG A134.0 6,699 D Y W CHEUNG 8 F M TRICE LOT 23, BLOCK 19 K726004 6009 KE LOGG A134.0 6.699 DIANE J HUBBARD TRUSTEE LOT 22, BLOCK 19 6013 KELLOGG A134.0 6,698 MICHAEL R LARSEN LOT 21, BLOCK 19 6000 OAKLAWN A134.0 6,497 J B 8 A A YUHAS LOT 1, BLOCK 19 6004 OAKLAWN A134.D 6.699 KYOO IL KIM 8 SAET BYUL PARK LOT 2, BLOCK 19 79 6DD8 OAKLAWN AVE 50.0 1 134.0 6,698 DANIEL B d LUANNE KUNA LOT 3. BLOCK 19 80 6012 OAKLAWN AVE 50,0 134.0 6,698 L B 8 J M ANDERSON LOT 4, BLOCK 19 MEAN 52.7 133 4 7,037 " All Legal Descnpbons are Uw plal of FAIRFAX. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA' MEDIAN 50.0 134.0 5,699 1 Ala, I J 59TH ST W 5901 59TH ST W 5900 5901 5900 5905 24 5903 5905 5904 5908 5309 5908 SD 24 PAIAE L� 5912 5313 5912 5916 5317 5916 5920 5921 . � 5920 5924 K m :� -�+t� GIS 27J; 5325 m 'T6h 5928 5929 5928 5931 5333 . 5932 5936 5937 5936 5940 s9a1 s9ao . 5944 5945 5944 ( j BOTH ST W SI n aaaai eiti Axn15- cxyao'n SCf I J 59 i f 0 I�Sof� 5845 5909 I • 'F 5908 I s�e� 5913 1 5912 5917 5916 5921 5841 5845 5544 —l1 I s 5844 592 5844 I. T t sh I•S s a s 5941 I 5 5940 1•S' s�e I • 1� 1 s� 59TH ST W 59TH S7 W 5901 5901.. 5900 59 5905 590 4 5905 590 5905 24 5909 5908 24 5913 5912 5917 5916 5921 5920 5925 5924 m 5925 m 5929 5926 5933 5932 5933 5932 Pamela Park 5937 5936 5937 5936 5941 5940 5945 5944 5945 5944 BATH ST W 6000 6001 6000 6001 6004 6005 6004 SI a ccar�! •nrn.A• iA1S- Cxrr -.un jC � ! OGL G� al)5 44911 59 i f 0 I�Sof� 5909 I • 'F 5908 I s�e� 5913 1 5912 5917 5916 5921 5920 —l1 I s 7 fI' 592 5928 I. T t sh I•S s a s 5941 I 5 5940 1•S' s�e I • 1� 1 s� hl� 590! + +��5f900 TTS.r 5905 5 5846 5909 5 5908 5841 5845 5644 5844 5844 59TH S7 W 59TH S7 W 590! 5901 5900 5905 5904 5905 24 5909 5908 24 5913 5912 5917 5916 5921 5920 5925 5924 m 5929 5928 5933 5932 Pamela Park 5937 5936 5941 5940 5945 5944 99TH ST W 6001 6001 6000 F��] 6004 6001 6004 4�m csrvxl xn A•rlUS. 5 G�.3175 S4fM1 590! + +��5f900 TTS.r 5905 5 5904 5909 5 5908 AgGh �U LOIN G CoU RA 6 ��S t , • •. t. 1,'` _ � ` r \•� � 'ar``' lI/���, dr��-���` +:{,� ter, �+ "Atm ti ��• \ e� .its. A� r " _ d" * �. f f - • Y Yv" a 9 70 � a ' • i _ i - a . + ��(, ,alp .��.*' +fit .'�,� ` rt• �;t,' T�. .� - , ip �. Tit., i' l � r'r. e i17r tii ♦F t �� .rrt }j't� ainylt `' xr , r.l ��T� '! ;�.. s1 �� iwr. two. It ,:,.e �. � :_. tip. f� •' �,.. , ..��t:S�' '�,� 'T Ilk 4 VtX4 w `l y MEMORANDUM ® Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: June 25, 2009 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle - Director of Public Works / City Engineer 6-1,p9w SUBJECT: Proposed Fairfax 2 "d Addition Engineering has reviewed the preliminary plat and the preliminary grading and utility plan for the above stated subdivision and offer the following comments: O A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit may possibly be required with this subdivision. Sheet 2 of 2 — Preliminary Gradinq & Utility Plan: 1. Revise swale to not have water drain from Lot 1 to Lot 2. 2. Line or replace both sanitary sewer services from the homes to the mainline. 3. Indicate a curb on the outer edge of both driveways (north edge for Lot 1 and south edge for Lot 2) to contain runoff water to each Lot. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks ki GAEngineering \General \O Streets\Fairfax 2nd Addition - Oaklawn Ave\20090625 review of Fairfax 2nd Addition.doc II To: I From: I Date: Subject: Mayor & City Council Cary Teague Planning Director September 15, 2009 Set Hearing Date for an Ordinance Amendment regarding regulations for accessory buildings in the R -1 Zoning District. KLFUK'1 %KEC:UMMhN UAT1UN Agenda Item IV.F. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommended Action: Set the hearing date for October 20, 2009. Information/Back ogr und: See attached Planning Commission staff report and proposed Ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 2; 2009 2009.0004A9a Director of Planning Information & Background The City Council recently amended the Zoning Ordinance to limit accessory buildings on property with single - family homes to no more than 1,000 square feet, and did not limit accessory buildings over 1,000 square feet on properties with a conditionally permitted use, such as a golf course or school. That, amendment allowed Interlachen Country Club to proceed with their building, as they had already been through the Conditional Use Permit process. The City Council agreed with the Planning Commission that requiring a Conditional Use Permit for buildings over 1,000 square feet on properties with a conditional use was appropriate. As a result, they requested that the Planning Commission study, and make a recommendation on an Ordinance Amendment that would require a Conditional Use Permit for accessory buildings over 1,000 square feet that are located on properties with a conditionally permitted use in the R -1, Single Family Residential Zoning district. The Council asked that a recommendation be forwarded to them within 90 days. This item was continued from last month's meeting in order for staff to provide additional information, including a survey of how other cities regulate accessory buildings. History The Code amendment made by the City Council followed the intent of the previous ordinance. The 1,000 square foot limit on accessory buildings was originally added to the Zoning Ordinance back in the early 1990's.. The intent of the ordinance was to address the issue the city was dealing with at the time regarding large accessory structures being built on property with single - family homes to store boats, RV's, lawn equipment etc. The Ordinance did not anticipate accessory buildings at golf courses or schools. Over the years, Edina Schools, Braemar and Fred Richards Golf Course, Edina Country Club, and the Interlachen Country Club have constructed a number of accessory buildings that far exceed 1,000 square feet on their sites. The following list demonstrates the number of accessory buildings on R -1 sites that exceed 1,000 square feet: Braemar • 17;200 square feet of maintenance buildings. • 30,000 square foot golf dome. 40,000 square foot ice rink. 25,000 square foot ice rink. 28,750 square foot ice rink (93,000 square foot total ice rink facility.) • 35,760 square foot police /fire training facilities • 1,600 square foot concession stand. Fred Richards Golf Course • 3,600 square feet of maintenance buildings. Edina Country Club • 2,500 square foot tennis court building. 2,800 square foot pool building. • 8,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. Edina Community Center Site 4,000 square foot maintenance /storage buildings Cornelia • 2,440 square feet of maintenance /storage buildings. Interlachen • 13,000 square feet of maintenance buildings. • 6,500 square feet of other accessory buildings. As recommended by the Planning Commission previously, these types of buildings in the future would be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit with the amendment. Survey of Cities To provide some background, staff conducted a survey of cities to compare regulations on accessory buildings. (See survey on the following page.) OA City Allow'detached bldgs. over 1,000 s.f. (non - residential use) Conditional Use Permit Required Setback Architectural Compatibility with principal structure Height Edina (existing ordinance Yes No 50 feet No 40 feet Edina (proposed ordinance Yes Yes 75 feet Yes 20 feet Apple Valley' 750 s.f. max.. No 5 -50 feet No 16 feet Blaine. Yes Yes 5 feet Yes 10 feet Bloomington Yes — 2000 s.f. max. No Based on Building height No 16 feet Columbia Heights No — 1,000,s.f. max. No 40 feet Yes No taller than principle bldg. Coon Rapids Yes —1 200 sf. Max. No 10 feet Yes 20 feet Cottage Grove Yes — 2,500 sf. Max. Yes 20 feet — side 50 feet — rear Yes 20 feet Eagan Yes No 10 feet Yes 30 feet Lakeville Yes Yes — For 2" acc. building 10 feet No 15 feet Maple Grove No — 1000 s.f. max No 15 feet - side 30 feet.- rear No 15 feet Medina No No No Minnetonka Yes Yes 15 feet or height of structure Yes 12 feet New Brighton Yes — 1,064 sf. Limit Yes 5 feet Yes 30 feet Plymouth. Yes Yes 40 No. 15 feet Robbinsdale Yes Yes No 16 feet St. Louis Park Yes Yes for golf courses 30 feet No 15 feet Richfield Yes —1,200 max. No 5 -40 feet No 40 feet Eden Prairie Yes No 10 feet No 15 feet Wayzata Yes No 10 feet Yes 25 feet As demonstrated above, there is a wide variety of regulations on accessory buildings. Also, similar to Edina's Ordinance, the regulations on golf course maintenance buildings and accessory buildings on conditionally permitted uses are often times not clear. If a golf course is zoned single - family residential, the maximum size regulation becomes problematic, should a golf course wish to construct a new maintenance building. Based on the above survey, and discussion from last month's meeting, staff has added the following conditions to the ordinance:. 1. The accessory building must be architecturally compatible with the principal building if the accessory building is located within 1,500 feet from the principal building. 2. The accessory building shall be limited to 20 feet in height:. 3. The..accessory building must be setback 75 feet from all property lines. 3 .r 4. Landscaping to be required to buffer views when the structure is highly visible from adjoining properties. Regarding the spacing requirement when an accessory building must be architecturally compatible with a principle building; the following lists the existing spacing between golf course club houses and maintenance buildings within the City: • Fred Richards 200 feet • Edina CC 1,658 feet • Braemar GC 1,579 feet • Interlachen 760 feet Recommendation /Conclusion Attached is the Ordinance that the Planning Commission previously recommended to the City Council, with conditions added based on the Commission discussion from last months meeting. Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. As with any Conditional Use Permit, on a case by case basis, the Planning Commission may require additional conditions to minimize impacts to adjacent property. 4 U ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING REGULATION OF ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 2 is hereby amended to add the following: 850.11. Subd.2 Conditional Uses. H. Accessory building(s) totaling 1,000 square feet or larger located on property on which a conditionally permitted use exists subject to the following conditions:. 1. The accessory building must be architecturally compatible I ith the principal building if the accessory building is located ;within 1.500 feet from the principal building: The accessory building heiaht shall be limited to 20 feet i 3. The accessory building must be setback a minimum of 75 fleet from all property lines. 4. Landscaping shall be required per Section 850.10 Subd. 2. A. Section 2. Sub Section 850.11. Subdivision 3 is hereby amended to add the following: 850.11. Subd. 3. Accessory Uses. B. Uses and facilities accessory to and on the same lot as a golf course, including maintenance buildings, golf driving ranges, swimming pools, tennis courts and other related recreational facilities. Accessory buildings totaling 1,000 square feet or larger require a conditional use permit. Section 3. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6 is hereby amended to read as follows: 850.11. Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. On lots with an existing conditional use, the combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, is 1,000 square feet or greater a conditional use permit is required. 2. Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. Section 4. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6.B. is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11.) Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Front Side Street Side Yard Rear Yar 13. a. All conditional 50' 50' 50' 50' use buildings or structures ineluding except parking lots, day care facilities, pre- schools and nursery schools. b. Accessory buildings 75' 75' 75' 75' on lots with a conditional use. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009 City Clerk �, Ow REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Information Only Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: September 15, 2009 Subject:' Traffic Safety Staff Review for Action September 8, 2009. Recommendation: Agenda Item IV. G. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA o ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Tuesday, September 8, 2009. Info /Background: SECTION B ITEM NO. 2: Request for an all -way stop at the intersection of Blake Road and Pine Grove Road. Resident Allison James of 5308 Evanswood Lane will be present at the Council meeting and . wants to speak against the recommendation for the denial of this request by the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Tuesday, September 8, 2009 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on -September 8, 2000.` Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer_, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Police Traffic Sergeant and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present; they can be included on the September 15, 2009, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Request on which staff recommends approval: 1: Request for a painted center line on Highwood Drive West where it curves into Highwood Drive. This request comes from a resident on Highwood Drive whose child, while riding his bike, was struck by a vehicle coming around the curve of Highwood Drive West onto Highwood Drive. The vehicle, while making this turn,.. veered into the oncoming lane and struck the bicycle. The rquestor states that many cars often cut across the lanes when negotiating this curve. Requestor states that this accident would have been prevented if the driver had stayed in her own lane. Highwood Drive West is a 28 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks. Parking is allowed on both sides, of the street. South bound Highwood Drive West has a slight downward grade just prior to the curve onto Highwood Drive. There has been one other accident at this curve in the past five years (car hit a utility pole). Staff feels that a dashed yellow center line on this curve would better define the driving lanes. Staff recommends the approval' of the request for a dashed yellow center line around the curve where Highwood Drive West meets Highwood Drive. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 5 September 8, 2009 G:\Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \09 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 09 -08 -09 2. Request for a painted center line on the curved section of Schaefer Road starting at 5705 and running south to 5713 Schaefer Road to better define the driving lanes of this curve. This request comes from a resident on the 5700 Block .,of Schaefer Road who is concerned with the safety of the children in the. area. He states that many cars come around this curve and swerve into .the oncoming lane of traffic. Schaefer Road is a 28 -foot wide city street with no, curb, gutter or sidewalks. Schaefer Road curves southbound from View Lane to Vernon Avenue. No accidents !have been reported on this block in the past five years. A„recent traffic study conducted on this block shows a Mon. =Fri. average daily traffic count of 889 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 32.8 mph.- There is an all -way stop-to the north at View Lane. Staff feels that a dashed yellow line running from 5705 to 5713 Schaefer Road would better define the dri ving lanes. from bound to 5713 Schaefer Road. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request. 1. Request,for a sign located on Valley View Road at the entrance of Creek Valley Road, with arrows,. pointing to the south, that states, "To Valley View Middle School, Edina High School and the Edina Center for the Performing Arts ". This request comes from a resident of Creek Valley Road who is frustrated that a few high school students park at the west. end of the cul -de -sac during the school day. She also states that many cars come down Creek Valley Road thinking they can access the school only to have to turn around and drive back out. Creek . Valley Road is clearly marked with a "No Outlet" sign at its entrance off of Valley View Road. Staff feels that very few drivers enter Creek Valley Road thinking they will have access to the school. Traffic Safety Staff Review September 8, 2009 Page 2 of 5 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \09 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 09 -08 -09 Staff has met with the requestor and given her copies of all of Edina's parking ordinances as well as the pertinent state statutes. The requestor has been advised to call police if any violations occur. Staff feels that an advisory sign of this type is unnecessary. It would cause sign clutter and provide too much information that would actually distract motorists. Staff recommends denial of the request for an advisory sign with arrows stating "To Valley View Middle School, Edina High School and the Edina Center for the Performing Arts located at Valley View Road and Creek Valley Road. 2. Request for a stop sign for north/south traffic on Blake Road at the intersection of Pine Grove Road. This request comes from a resident on Evanswood Lane, which is one block north of Pine Grove Road, who is concerned for the safety of pedestrians in the area as well as the safety of drivers. There is a slight downward grade for north bound Blake Road traffic at Evanswood Lane. Blake Road is a 32 -foot wide "Collector" street with curb, gutter and a side walk on the east side. There has been one possible injury accident at Blake Road and Evanswood Lane and one property damage accident at Blake Road and Pine Grove Road reported within the past five years. As a result of this request, a traffic study was conducted from July 30 to August 7, 2009. The average Mon. -Fri. daily traffic count is 2,315 with an 85th- percentile speed of 36.0 mph. There are no stop signs for Blake Road traffic between Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. Blake Road is a state aid street that was resurfaced this summer. Edina Police have placed Blake Road on their radar enforcement list. Warrants are not met for an all -way stop at Blake Road and Pine Grove Road. Staff recommends the denial of the request for a north /south stop sign (making this intersection an all -way stop) at Blake Road and Pine Grove Road for lack of warrants. Request for a "Road Narrows" sign to be placed on McCauley Trail South in the area of Courtney Fields where the road narrows from 36 -feet to 30- feet. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 5 September 8, 2009 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \09 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 09 -08 -09 This request comes from a resident who jogs and walks in this area on a daily basis. She states that the road narrows just past a curve adjacent to Courtney Fields and that cars come extremely close to her. The bike lane ends just prior to this north bound curve. This stretch of McCauley Trail South is a "Collector" street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks. The Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count is 3,556 with an 85th- percentile speed of 29.1 mph. There have been no reported accidents in the past five years. Advisory signs are not enforceable and do little to improve driving habits. Staff feels that striping both sides of McCauley Trail South (the 30 -foot section), similar to that on Interlachen Boulevard, would be more effective than an advisory sign. This would allow joggers and bicycle riders to have their own area of the roadway while leaving the street wide enough to accommodate traffic. Staff recommends the denial of the request for a "Road Narrows" sign and recommends the approval of striping both sides of this section of McCauley Trail South (width of lanes to be determined). 4. Request for a sign that reads "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" to be added to the current stop sign at west bound West 66th Street at Valley View Road. This request comes from a resident on West 66th Street who is concerned for driver safety at this intersection. West 66t1 Street at Valle View Road is currently controlled by a stop sign for west bound West 66t Street traffic. No traffic data is available for this section of West 66th Street. There has been one reported property damage accident at this intersection in the past five years. Valley View Road is a `B Minor Arterial" roadway with an average daily traffic count of 6,679 vehicles and an 851h- percentile speed of 36.8 mph. The intersection has no clear view issues and traffic can be seen at a good distance from both directions. The right -of -way is clearly defined by the stop sign on West 66th Street. There are no exigent circumstances present that would warrant the addition of a "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" sign at this location. of the request for a "Cross Traffic Not Stoo" sign at West 66"m Street and Valley View Road for lack of warrants. Traffic Safety Staff Review September 8, 2009 Page 4 of 5 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \09 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 09 -08 -09 SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request to restrict parking on Sunday mornings from 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM on Edina Court. A survey will be sent out to the residents for their input. 2. Request for a pedestrian crosswalk crossing Interlachen Boulevard at Vandervork Avenue. Requestor has submitted a signed petition for a sidewalk. Traffic Safety Staff Review September 8, 2009 Page 5 of 5 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \09 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 09 -08 -09 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 -9/3/2009 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - 326153 913/2009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY ". 59.00 219176 0722694 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 35.40 219177 0803631 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 43.60 219178 0803618 5842.5515 COST.OF -GOODS SOLD MIX' 65.05 219364 6722735 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 48.00 219479 0722736 5862.5515 - COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 87.00 219480 0803619 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 105.40 219481 0722696 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 72.80 219482 0803638 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 70.80 219516 0803719 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 48.00 219517 0803718 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 635.05 326154 91312009 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 2,456.60 25' LIGHT POLE 00002299 219403 6316 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,464.03 COURTYARD LIGHTING REPAIR 00002276 219404- 6265 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES 4,920.63 326155 9/312009 103357. ALPHA VIDEO &-AUDIO INC. 196.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL_ ` _ 219103 ALERTINV11807 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 196.50 326156 91312009 102214 AMERICAN LEAK DETECTION - 750:00 REPAIR POOL LEAK 219310 9878 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 750.00 " 326157 9/312009 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 140.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 219311. 082609 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE a 140.50 326158 9/3/2009 122312 'ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 360.00 GIFT SHOP HELP 219273 082709 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360.00 326159 9/3/2009 124433 ANDERSON, MARLYN 68.26 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 219274 082709 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 68.26 326160 91312009 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 551.35., FOOD 219104 1206772 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - 551.35 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page- 1 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK COMMUNICATIONS POOL OPERATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 2 9/3/2009 - 9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326161 91312009 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 303.03 COFFEE 219232 413675 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 303.03 326162 9/3/2009 120995 AVR INC. 590.00 CONCRETE 00005448 219105 24240 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,003.00 CONCRETE 00005448 219106 24084 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 715.00 CONCRETE 00005448 219107 24004 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 737.50 CONCRETE 00005448 219108 24326 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,045.50 326163 9/3/2009 100638 BACHMAN'S 337.01 PLANTS, MULCH 00005105 219109 15778 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 337.01 326164 9/3/2009 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 5.00- CREDIT 219233 C10159 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 957.36 BATTERIES 00001660 219234 C10380 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 952.36 326165 91312009 103697 BECKER, MIKE 728.00 MERCHANDISE 194960 338717 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 728.00 326166 91312009 120517 BEITEL, DAWN 179.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219442 082809 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 179.85 326167 913/2009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 244.00 219179 50140600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 865.10 219180 50082800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 670.55 219181 50125700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,148.16 219182 50111800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 989.75 219183 50109000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 145.59 219184 82640700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 291.40 219365 50127500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 457.30 219483 50189900 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 114.77 219484 82669900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 133.66 219485 82643400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 192.36 219486 5852000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,546.98 219518 50118700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 832.20 219519 50194800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 9/3/2009 —913/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 120.93 219520 82670000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 334.10 219521 5855100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,086.85 326168 91312009 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 495.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219275 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 495.00 326169 9/312009 100176 BESSER GLASS & MIRROR 66.59 GLASS REPLACEMENT 00002310 219443 124273 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 66.59 326170 91312009 101691 BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 470.04 GOLF PENCILS 219110 24616 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 470.04 326171 9/3/2009 117013 BILL'S HOME REPAIR & REMODELIN 15,900.00 NEW WINDOWS, DOOR, ROOF 219312 082009 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 15,900.00 326172 9/3/2009 119153 BLACKBURN MFG. CO. 85.29 FLAGS 00001973 219111 0358133 -IN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 85.29 326173 91312009 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 219098 090109 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 326174 91312009 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 1,472.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219276 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,472.00 326175 91312009 124604 BONUCCI, TIFFANY 85.00 ALARM OVERPAYMENT REFUND 219313 082709 1400.4332 FALSE ALARMS - POLICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.00 326176 91312009 122942 BORNOWSKI, CLAY 918.00 MAINTENANCE 219277 082709 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 918.00 326177 91312009 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,557.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003575 219444 87085145 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 4 913/2009 —9/312009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,557.90 326178 91312009 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 732.49 SPRING ASSEMBLY, U -BOLTS 00001985 219112 324213 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 847.55 SPRING, KIT, PIN, BOLTS 00001989 219314 325479 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.08 ALUMINUM 00001656 219405 324676 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,598.12 326179 91312009 124593 BRONSON, JOYCE 55.00 TRIP REFUND 219235 082409 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 55.00 326180 9/3/2009 101489 BROOKS, DARLENE 1,080.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219278 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,080.00 326181 9/3/2009 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 846.39 NEWSLETTER 219113 18587 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 846.39 326182 9/3/2009 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 219097 090109 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 326183 91312009 102482 CAMPBELL PET COMPANY 215.48 PET FOOD 219315 0241483 -IN 1450.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL 215.46 326184 913/2009 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 160.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 219279 082709 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 160.00 326185 9/3/2009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 186.00 219185 16423 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 54.90 219186 16428 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,037.05 219187 16426 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,653.00 219366 16427 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,930.95 326186 913/2009 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 2,849.00 219188 83251 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 780.00 219189 83191 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/212009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/3/2009 --9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 120.00 219367 83278 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,749.00 2,032.51 326187 91312009 100681 CATCO 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 173.19 PURGE VALVE KITS 00001654 219114 3 -77774 1553.6530 68.82 SEALS 00001988 219316 3 -78095 1553.6530 135.69 CARTRIDGES, FITTINGS 00001988 219317 3 -78050 1553.6530 120.18 MUD FLAPS 00001992 219318 3 -78129 1553.6530 497.88 90.00 ADVERTISING 219445 D10021494 326188 913/2009 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 180.00 14.95 5596524 -8 219236 5596524 -8/09 5430.6186 16.64 8033998 -9 367.50 219237 8033998 -8/09 1552.6186 1,296.04 5591458 -4 367.50 219238 5591458 -8/09 1551.6186 38.82 8034001 -1 219239 8034001 -8/09 1552.6186 10.50 5584310 -6 409.70 219319 5584310 -8/09 7413.6186 218.24 5584304 -9 348.50 219320 5584304 -8/09 7411.6186 10.50 5590919 -6 758.20 219321 5590919 -8/09 7413.6582 426.82 5546504 -1 219406 5546504 -8109 1470.6186 5511.6180 5631.6122 5631.6122 5125.6103 5862.5515 5822.5515 1552.6406 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT FUEL OIL HEAT. CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF FIRE TOWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO i VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,032.51 326189 9/312009 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 3,511.65 WATER TREATMENT 00008044 219322 515406 ` 3,511.65, 326190 9/3/2009 103040 CITY P_ AGES 90.00 ADVERTISING 219115 D10021256 90.00 ADVERTISING 219445 D10021494 180.00 326191 9/3/2009 116304 CLAY, DON - 367.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 219280 082709 367.50 326192 9131.2009 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 409.70 219487 0138411014 348.50 219488 0198159105 758.20 326193 9/3/2009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 63.45 GLOVES, HAND SANITIZER 00005098 219240 03517748 63.45 5511.6180 5631.6122 5631.6122 5125.6103 5862.5515 5822.5515 1552.6406 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT FUEL OIL HEAT. CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF FIRE TOWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO i VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 6 9/3/2009 -9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 326194 9/3/2009 101704 COOK, BARBARA 965.41 PROGRAM COORDINATOR 219446 9 -1507 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 149.29 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 219447 082709 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 1,114.70 326195 91312009 124598 COOPER, BILL . 65.00 ARTWORK SOLD 219281 082709 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 326196 91312009 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 120.00 'INSTRUCTOR AC 188547 062008 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 324.00- INSTRUCTOR AC 191362 072508 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.60 INSTRUCTOR AC 192949 066508 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 756.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 201940 121808 5110.6103` PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION = 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 210355 042309 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION - 1,590.00 326197 9/3/2009 122376 CORPORATE CONNECTION 836.85 SAFETY VESTS ' 00001869 219241 1819 1280.6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD ' 836.85 326198 9/3/2009 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. - 100.54 TEMPERATURE SENSOR 00006088 219448 147527 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 100.54 326199 913/2009 104020 DALCO 941.57 TISSUE, WYPALL, DEGREASER 00008039 219323 2126115 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 941.57 326200 91312009 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 216.00 219190 814152 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 216.00 326201 9/312009 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. - 1,460.40 219191 517857 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS 'SOLD BEER YORK'SELLING 22.40 219192 517858 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 22.40 219193 517855 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 334.22 219194 517854 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ' - 184.50 219195 517741 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 239.00 219195 517741 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 184.50 219522 517740 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING v R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 7 9/3/2009 -- 9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,326.30 219523 517853 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,773.72 326202 9/3/2009 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 199.75 GEARWORKS 00001962 219116 4- 118370 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 199.75 326203 91312009 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 304.30 609425 WATER 219117 6816858 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 304.30 326204 91312009 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 6.22 GASKETS & DEPRESSOR 00005089 219118 410947 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.15 SOCKETS, WRENCHES 00005147 219476 412059 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 370.31 MULTIMETER, LEAD SET 00001987 219477 411907 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 475.68 326205 9/3/2009 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 62.33 BAKERY 219119 309308 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 45.90 BAKERY 219120 309550 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 51.70 BAKERY 219121 309555 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 159.93 326206 913/2009 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 648.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219282 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 648.00 326207 9/312009 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 973.60 FA -2 00005444 219122 68917 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 973.60 326208 9/3/2009 116357 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC. 757.90 MCQUAY ENGINEERING 219407 201001248 5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 757.90 326209 9/3/2009 119729 ECKMAN, PETER 150.00 CONCERT 8123/09 219242 082409 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 326210 9/312009 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 77.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 00009015 219324 80601 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 77.02 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/212009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 8 9/3/2009 — 9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326211 9/3/2009 119000 EDINA' ROTARY FOUNDATION INC. 166.66 SPONSORSHIP 219408 1014 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 166.66 SPONSORSHIP 219408 1014 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 166.68 SPONSORSHIP 219408 1014 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 500.00 326212 91312009 100747 ELSMORE AQUATIC 53.22 LIFEGUARD SUIT 219123 18083 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 53.22 326213 9/3/2009 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 818.23 E -81 REPAIRS 219325 44283 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 733.87 E -83 REPAIRS 219449 44408 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,552.10 326214 9/3/2009 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 6,893.44 MANHOLE COVERS 00005453 219243 MM3584 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 70.54- CREDIT - INV MM3570 219244 MM3570C 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 6,822.90 326215 913/2009 103351 ESSIG'S TREE & LANDSCAPE INC. 6,518.00 LANDSCAPING 00003568 219450 995 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 6,518.00 326216 913/2009 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 167.50 219489 802609 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 167.50 326217 9/3/2009 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 482.22 FILTERS, VALVES, PLUGS 00001980 219124 6- 1162652 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 482.22 326218 9/3/2009 124245 FARMER BROS. CO. 383.90 COFFEE 219125 81444589 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 383.90 326219 9/3/2009 104474 FILTERFRESH 285.65 COFFEE 00005120 219126 46601456 -2010 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 285.65 326220 9/3/2009 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/312009 - 9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explariation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 219283 082709 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP. RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY COURSE BEAUTIFICATION ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER REVENUES CLUB HOUSE GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 26.00 326221 9/3/2009 101475 FOOTJOY 106.94 SHOES 219245 5752266 5440.5511 290.14 GLOVES 219246 5752271 5440.5511 397.08 326222 913/2009 118898 FREEMAN, KIRK 243.75 ART WORK SOLD 219284 082709 5101.4413 243:75 326223 91312009 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 1,100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219285 082709 5110.6103 1,100.00 " 326224. 913/2009 100764 G & K SERVICES 81.87 SHOP TOWELS 219451 1006760521 5422.6201 81.87 SHOP TOWELS 219452 1006736907 5422.6201 163.74 326225 91312009 123080 GARDEN VIEW GREENHOUSE 149.45 MUMS 00006002 219127 396336 5422.6275 149.45 326226 9/3/2009 101867" GETSINGER; DONNA ,.. 87.10 ART WORK SOLD 219286 082709 5101.4413 87.10 326227 913/2009 124541 GEYEWGROUP 295.01 CARPET MAINTENANCE. 00006001 219247 2255 5420.6511 295.01 326228 91312009 101103' GRAINGER, 475.38 HAND TOOLS 00005097 219128 9058746125 5932.6406 36.62 SLEDGE HAMMER _00005097 219129 9058746133 5932.6406 28.79 BATTERIES 00005102 216130 9059572389 1552.6406 30.25 CLEANER/DEGREASER 219326 9060037489 7411.6406 6.87 BUSHING 219327 9060037497 7411.6406. 304.94 WATER FILTERS 00006325 219453 9055617022 5420.6406 30.11 GLOVES 00006329 219454 9055617014 5431.6406 914.96 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP. RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY COURSE BEAUTIFICATION ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER REVENUES CLUB HOUSE GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 —9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 326229 913/2009 120201 GRANICUS INC. 829.64 WEBSTREAMING 219131 14185 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 10 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO EB /CL REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL GASOLINE GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 829.64 326230 9/3/2009 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 314.78 PVC PIPE, COUPLINGS 00005130 219248 093090 4091.6406 314.78 326231 91312009 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 43.55 ART WORK SOLD 219287 082709 5101.4413 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219287 082709 5110.6103 343.55 326232 9/312009 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 63.90 GOLF NET 00006208 219132 40507 5440.5511 63.90 326233 9/312009 100840 GUSTAFSON, KATHY 540.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219288 082709 5125.6103 540.00 326234 9/3/2009 124591 HALLING, BRITNEY 375.00 RENTAL FEE REFUND 219249 082209 5601.4555 375.00 326235 91312009 124524 HALPERN, JAMIE 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219289 082709 5110.6103 180.00 326236 9/3/2009 101733 HANLY, WILLIAM 87.65 REFUND FOR BOOKS 219409 082809 1640.6104 87.65 326237 9/3/2009 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 6,261.83 GAS 00001437 219133 SO10031558 1553.6581 8,620.16 GAS 00001437 219134 SO10031557 1553.6581 14,881.99 326238 91312009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,957.70 CHEMICALS 00005451 219328 3050515 5915.6586 3,957.70 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 10 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO EB /CL REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL GASOLINE GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/312009 -913/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 326239 91312009 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 10.00 SUPPLIES 219290 082709 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 67.50 INSTRUCTOR 219290 082709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BOARD & ROOM PRISONER SIGNS & POSTS GENERAL SUPPLIES LINE MARKING POWDER 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 11 Business Unit MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO LEGAL SERVICES STREET NAME SIGNS EDINBOROUGH PARK FIELD MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CRAFT SUPPLIES I ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 77.50 PARK ADMIN.`GENERAL GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE EB /CL REVENUES AMBULANCE FEES 326240 913/2009 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,273.25 JULY ROOM & BOARD 219329 20097 - EDINA 1195.6225 3,273.25 326241 9/312009 .101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 662.63 POSTS 00005094 219410 65032323 -001 1325.6531 662.63 ' 326242 9/3/2009 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 10.02 SCRUB BRUSH 00002284 219411 .2992898 5620.6406 10.02 326243 913/2009 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 799.96 FIELD STRIPING PAINT 00005510 219135 84504 1642.6544 799.96 326244 91312009 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,278.00 219368 496403 5842.5514 1,718.70 219524 496269 5862.5514 2,996.70 326245 91312009 102410 HOOFNAGLE, LYLE 162.74 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 195028 091208 5110.6564 162.74 326246 9/3/2009 122726 HORNS, NICK 5.61 PARTIAL REFUND 188739 061908 1000.2039 84.39 PARTIAL REFUND 188739 061908 1600.4722.05 90.00 326247 91312009 124592 HUMANN, ANDY 10.00 PUTTING REFUND 219250 081909 5601.4593 10.00 326248 91312009 124605 HUNTER, RICHARD 535.11 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 219330 082709 1470.4329 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER SIGNS & POSTS GENERAL SUPPLIES LINE MARKING POWDER 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 11 Business Unit MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO LEGAL SERVICES STREET NAME SIGNS EDINBOROUGH PARK FIELD MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CRAFT SUPPLIES I ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET FIELD USER FEE PARK ADMIN.`GENERAL GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE EB /CL REVENUES AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register ' . Page - 12 9/312009 .-4/3/2009 Check # Date - Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger- Account Description Business Unit 535.11 326249 91312009 104822 HYDRO LOGIC 74.38 SPRINKLER PARTS 00001911 219412 0405624 -IN 1643.6530: REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 807.12 PIPE AND HEADS 00006326 219455 0405020 -IN 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 881.50 326250 9/3/2009 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 285.57 PHONES /INTERNET 219331 5748950 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 285.57 326251 91312009 100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC 56.29 FILTER 00001984 219136 0003008084:01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 95.57 FILTERS 00001984 219137 C001043468:01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.86 326252 9/3/2009 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 219102 090109 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 326253 9/312009 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 628.34 BATTERY CHARGER 00001123 219475 7/10/09 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 628.34 326254 91312009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 85.00 219196 957247 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER. .;: 50TH ST SELLING 65.10 219369 957864 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 67.50 219490 1300252 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,184.70 219491 1304735 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 195.75 219525 958055 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,914.15 219526 1304737 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON.SELLING 6,512.20 326256 9/3/2009 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,283.69 219197 1684656 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,410.38 219198 1684655 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 74.45 219199 1684649 5842.5513 COST OF G006S SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 650.67 219200 1684650 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE YORK SELLING 3,061.32 219201 1684658 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS :SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,073.36 219370 1688562 5842.5512 COST OF'GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 178.24 219371 1688559 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,987.67 219372 1688564 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 13 9/3/2009 .-9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 129.48 219373 1688565 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD-MIX YORK SELLING 38.57- 219374 428159 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.71- 219375 429622 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS"SOLD.WINE YORK 'SELLING. 117.06- 219376 429017 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.65- 219377 429776 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 32.72- 219378 429304 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD'NANE YORK SELLING 42.72- 219379 425572 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.79- 219380 429976 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.93- 219381 429978 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.79- 219382 429977, 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.00- 219383 -- 429979 5842.5513 COST OFGOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.00- 219384' ..430126 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.12- 219385 429777 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 278.63 219492 1688553 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,516.84 219493 1688572 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 677.55 219494 1688567 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 160.85 219495 1688571 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 298.63 219496 1688552 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 523.40 219497 1688551 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 810.21 219498 1688554 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,183.42 219499 1688555 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4.67- 219500 426393 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - YORK SELLING 15,839.06 326257 9/312009 103654 JOHNSON; DENISE " 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC- 219291 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES• ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 9 300.06 326258 91312009 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 201.69 AC MOTOR 00005082 219456 027030 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 201.69 326259 91312009 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA - 298.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 219292 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ' 298.50 326260 91312009 101340, KOCHENASH, RICK 510.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219293 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 510.00 326261 9/312009 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD 32.55 PAINT & SUPPLIES 219332 082609 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/3/2009 -9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 53.89 WORKBENCH 219332 082609 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 86.44 326262 9/3/2009 106094 KOUTSKY, DEAN 324.00 INSTRUCTOR 219294 082709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 324.00 326263 913/2009 123712 KRUGER, JORDAN 7.50 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE 219333 082709 1413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT 7.50 326264 9/3/2009 123096 LASER TECHNOLOGIES INC. 660.81 CITATION ENVELOPES 219334 92111 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 660.81 326265 913/2009 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 54.37 NUTS, BOLTS 00005106 219335 8390378 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 260.47 SEALANT, OPEN & SHUT 00005112 219336 8390375 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 422.38 CUT OFF WHEELS, NUTS, SCREWS 00005107 219337 8390376 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.58 TERMINAL COVERS 00005107 219338 8390377 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 742.80 326266 91312009 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 15.00 DATA PRACTICES 219251 132717 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.00 DATA PRACTICES 219251 132717 1180.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ELECTION 60.00 SUPERVISION CLASS 219339 132786 5910.6027 TRAINING GENERAL (BILLING) 90.00 326267 9/3/2009 124601 LENTSCH, PAUL 45.00 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE 219340 082609 1413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT 45.00 326268 9/3/2009 110888 LOPEZ, ELIZABETH 135.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219478 082709 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 135.85 326269 9/3/2009 101792 LUBE -TECH 2,579.25 BULK OIL 00001148 219252 1686783 1553,6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 572.64 BULK OIL 00001149 219341 1687985 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,151.89 326270 91312009 122472 M & 1 BANK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 15 9/3/2009 - 913/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 31.87 TELEPHONE 219342 081409 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 55.91 5822.5515 219342 081409 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 146.03 219342 081409 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 154.66 219342 081409 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 211.77 219342 081409 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 600.24 326274 326271 91312009 118096 M -B COMPANIES INC 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 192.40 BUSHINGS, GASKETS 00001976 219138 138375 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.40 210.91 326272 9/3/2009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 326275 91312009 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,027.53 50TH ST SELLING AMBULANCE FEES 219501 68680 5862.5515 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 648.96 219527 69162 5822.5515 1,676.49 326273 9/3/2009 124607 MACKAY, IRMA 69.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 219343 082709 1470.4329 69.00 326274 91312009 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 210.91 DIRT SHOE RUNNERS 00001981 219344 2094769 1553.6530 210.91 326275 91312009 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 218.48 219253 607347489 1550.6188 218.48 326276 913/2009 112360 MAY, DOUG 1,250.00 OUTDOOR SIGNS 00009076 219295 2 5111.6406 1,250.00 326277 9/3/2009 103720 MEDTECH 2,065.65 WRISTBANDS 00002100 219413 IN000290695 5621.6406 2,065.65 326278 9/312009 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 99.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219414 082509 1652.6107 99.00 326279 9/3/2009 101987 MENARDS 180.07 VISE, CLAMPS, TOOLS 00002306 219415 9844 5630.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 -913/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 91212009 7:47:29 Page - 16 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 180.07 AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 326280 9/3/2009 PONDS & LAKES 102281 MENARDS 15.55 LUMBER, BINS 00005104 219416 25059 1646.6577 15.55 326281 9/3/2009 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 382.88 WIND SCREENS 00001571 219139 117850 1642.6406 264.89 SOCCER NETS, FIELD PAINT 00001810 219140 117849 1642.6406 647.77 326282 9/3/2009 102068 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRA 994.94 BOILER CLEANING 219417 204020913 5620.6103 994.94 326283 9/3/2009 101471 MGCSA 80.00 DULUTH GOLF EVENT 219457 082809 5410.6104 80.00 326284 9/3/2009 124602 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 28.00 MICROSOFT EVENT MEALS 219345 082809 1554.6104 28.00 326285 9/3/2009 100890 MIDWESTAQUACARE 10,572.00 WEED AND ALGAE TREATMENTS 00005153 219141 ARROWHEAD09 4086.6103 9,489.00 WEED AND ALGAE TREATMENTS 00005143 219142 INDIANHEAD09 4086.6103 350.00 DNR PERMIT FEE 00001905 219143 MELODY1905 5933.6103 2,490.00 WEED AND ALGAE TREATMENT 00001904 219144 MELODY1904 5933.6103 2,490.00 WEED AND ALGAE TREATMENT 00001900 219145 MELODY1900 5933.6103 25,391.00 326286 9/3/2009 102442 MIKE'S PRO SHOP 139.26 SOFTBALL TROPHIES 219458 56381 4077.6406 139.26 326287 9/3/2009 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,100.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005039 219254 33476 5913.6180 1,100.00 326288 9/312009 105716 MINNESOTA AWWA 205.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 219346 082709 5919.6104 205.00 LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 91212009 7:47:29 Page - 16 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 913/2009 - 9/312009 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 17 Check # . Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326289 9/312009 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22 077 00 CONNECTION FEE 219255 082709 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT PLANNING DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF CARS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE RANGE MAINT OF. COURSE $ GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 22,077.00 326290 9/3/2009 102927 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 180.00 PRESERVATION CONFERENCE 219256 082009 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 180.00 326291 91312009 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 2,661.10 FIRE HYDRANT 00005121 219459 0243714 5913.6530. REPAIR PARTS 2,661.10 32.6292 9/312009 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 289.00 INSERT AD 219418 104105 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 289.00 INSERT AD 219418 104105 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 289.00 INSERT AD 219418 104105 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 867.00 326293 9/3/2009 124609 MOBILITY OUTDOORS 178.00 CHARGER 00006325 219460 09- 233 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 178.00 326294 91312009 122241 MONAHAN, KIMBERLY 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219296 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL- SERVICES 270.00 326295 9/312009 108537 MOORE, JOEL 148.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 219347 082809 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 148.99 326296 9/312009 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 104.12 JOINT ASSEMBLIES 00001661 219419 471380F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 104.12 326297 9/312009 100906 MTI` DISTRIBUTING INC. 606.32 REGULATORS, SPRINKLER HEADS 00001789 219146 690828 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 93.67 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005083 219147 693279 -02 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 71.22 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001811 219148 693972 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 15.69 GAS CAP 00006330 219461 693799 -00 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS 28.08 JUMPER 00006094 219462 693728 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 92.30 SEAL KITS 00006094 219463 693728 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS PLANNING DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF CARS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE RANGE MAINT OF. COURSE $ GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 18 9/3/2009 - 9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier-/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. Business Unit 907.28 326298 9/3/2009 124599 MUSTFUL, SEASON 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219297 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 288.00 326299 91312009 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHI 200.00 ADVERTISING 00006000 219149 49974 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER - GOLF ADMINISTRATION 200.00 326300 9/3/2009 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 458.00 219202 55985 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD,WINE YORK SELLING 458.00 326301 91312009 101958 NICOL, JANET 530.28 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 219298 082709 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 530.28 326302 91312009 104350 NIKE USA INC. 126.45 .MERCHANDISE 219257. 922501900 5440.5511. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 126.45' MERCHANDISE 219258 922501901 '5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 94.49 'STAFF SHIRTS- 219259 922617894 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 347.39 - 326303 91312009 100.724 NISSEN, DICK ' 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 219101 090109 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 326304 91312009 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 504.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219299 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 504.00 326305 91312009 124594 OELSCHLAGER, EVANN - 110.00 TRIP REFUND (2) 219260 082409 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 110.00 326306 91312009 - 103578 'OFFICE DEPOT 84.60' TONER, PAPER 00002307 219150 484665824001 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 67.31 INK CARTRIDGES FOR FAX 00008042 219348 484251761001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 107.61 PAPER, TAPE, LOCK 219420 484299174001 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH'ADMINISTRATION 259.52 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 19 9/312009 -9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326307 9/3/2009 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 468.80 219261 W09070622 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 21.62 219262 W09070616 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 21.62 219262 W09070616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.24 219262 W09070616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.24 219262 W09070616 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 86.48 219262 W09070616 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 86.57 219262 W09070616 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 108.10 219262 W09070616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 108.37 219262 W09070616 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 112.85 219262 W09070616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 129.72 219262 W09070616 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 150.55 219262 W09070616 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 151.34 219262 W09070616 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 302.68 219262 W09070616 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 311.92 219262 W09070616 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 311.92 219262 W09070616 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 2,459.02 326308 9/3/2009 124606 OLSON, JASON 1,385.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 219349 082709 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,385.00 326309 9/312009 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 139.97 COOKIES 219151 87521492 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 139.97 326310 9/312009 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 176.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219421 082709 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 176.55 326311 9/3/2009 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 962.50 SERVICE CONTRACT 00006330 219422 29651 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 962.50 326312 9/3/2009 102440 PASS, GRACE 378.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219300 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 464.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 219300 082709 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 842.00 326313 9/3/2009 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,113.25 219203 8232404 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 -9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 453.00 219204 8231699 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,731.15 219528 8232407 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5125.6103 5913.6180 5311.6103 1400.4332 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6583 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 20 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION FALSE ALARMS - POLICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,297.40 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 326314 9/312009 YORK SELLING 123330 PEARSON, KARI COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 300.00 INSTRUCTOR 219301 082709 YORK SELLING 300.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 326315 9/3/2009 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100674 PENHALL COMPANY YORK SELLING 325.00 SAW CUT CONCRETE 00005125 219350 52574 325.00 326316 91312009 124600 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 149.10 PEST CONTROL/CONCESSION AREA 219351 082109 149.10 326317 9/312009 124603 PETERSON, MARK 5.00 ALARM OVERPAYMENT REFUND 219352 082709 5.00 326318 91312009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 805.29 219205 2796627 1,524.57 219206 2796630 3,231.36 219207 2796628 35.12 219386 2799690 637.09 219387 2799688 21.36- 219388 3418201 10.00- 219389 3412948 5.52- 219390 3412078 149.89- 219391 3418489 218.86 219502 2799694 126.28 219503 2799684 841.00 219504 2799685 2,294.99 219505 2799683 8.18- 219506 3416202 9,519.61 326319 9/312009 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 450.63 TIRES 00001652 219152 1452 215.79 TIRES 00001623 219153 866196 515.91 TIRES 00001860 219154 4220 491.06 TIRES 00001860 219263 11946 5125.6103 5913.6180 5311.6103 1400.4332 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6583 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 20 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION FALSE ALARMS - POLICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERA -- -" GEN R55CKREG . LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 } Council Check Register Page - 21 9/3/2009 -913/2009 Check #. Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit t 1,673.39 326320 9/312009 100819 POPP.COM 369.36 TELEPHONES 00006331 219423 96709 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM ; 369.36 ' 326321 91312009 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE C 801.56 REMOVE TREE, GRIND STUMP 00001906 219424 9218 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 801.56 326322 9/312009 ° 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 599.78 VESSELS 00006332 219464 33482 5431.6545 CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE _ 599.78 326323 .91312009 113629 PRO MAINTENANCE INC. 5,911.60 MEZZANINE FLOORING 00003562 219353 8579 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5,911.60 :326324 913/2009 -106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 426.67 WIPES, ROLL TOWELS, TISSUE 00002309 219155 4574 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 374.65. LINERS, ROLLTOWEL, TISSUE 00002102 219425 4571 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 801.32 326.325 91312009 100971 QUALITY WINE 322.57 219208 198545 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 668.66 219209 198425 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 439.00 219210 197628 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 660.81 219211 195979 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,439.30 219392 198422 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 896.60 219393 198423 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,479.00 219394 198420 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2;498.45 219507 198419 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 204.80 - 219529 198544 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,626.22 219530 198199 -00- 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11;235.41 326326 91312009 123898 ;QWEST 52.97 952 922 -2444 219264 2444 -8/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 113.73 952920- 8166 219265 8166 -8109 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 166:70 . 326327 91312009 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 —9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 594.23 UTILITY BILL MAILING 219156 2447 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL. SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 912/2009 7:47:29 Page- 22 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) ARENA ICE MAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRILL HEALTH SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 594.23 326328 91312009 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 608.12 SOFTENER SALT 00008050 219354 00224916 5521.6406 608.12 326329 9/312009 100982 ROTO- ROOTER 276.00 DRAIN CLEANING 219426 04815183289 5620.6103 276.00 326330 9/312009 104301 RUECKERT, MARY 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 9113109 219427 082709 5621.6136 150.00 326331 9/3/2009 122921 SANIMAX USA 20.00 OIL PICKUP 00006003 219266 491145 5421.6406 20.00 326332 91312009 101106 SERVICEMASTER 2,805.47 HOUSE CLEAN -UP 219267 24065 4298.6103 2,805.47 326333 913/2009 103249 SHANNON, JIM 110.00 ENTERTAINMENT 9108/09 219428 082709 5621.6136 110.00 326334 9/3/2009 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 414.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219302 082709 5110.6103 1,704.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 219302 082709 5112.6103 2,118.00 326335 913/2009 118743 SHOR, STEVEN 52.00 ART WORK SOLD 219303 082709 5101.4413 52.00 326336 913/2009 120761 SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES 575.00 CARD ACCESS SYSTEM REPAIRS 00007138 219465 5441351210 1600.6103 575.00 326337 913/2009 120458 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CDR 284.39 SOLENOID VALVE 00008043 219355 2848439 5521.6406 GENERAL. SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 912/2009 7:47:29 Page- 22 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) ARENA ICE MAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRILL HEALTH SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 —9/3/2009 . Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 284.39 326338 9/3/2009 116235 SIR SPEEDY 169.49 . ENERGY COMMISSION POSTCARDS 219157 30009 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 169.49 326339 9/3/2009 110977 SOW, ADAMA 1,170.00 CLEANING 219304 082709 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,159.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219304 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,329.00 326340 91312009 119715 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC. 572.59 PIZZA CUTTERS 00003569 219356 412483 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 572.59 326341 9/3/2009 101004 SPS COMPANIES 329.92 PIPE, COUPLINGS 00005101 219158 S2083040.001 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.01 GASKET KITS, NUTS 00001814 219429 S2083579.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 424.93 .326342 913/2009 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 189.25 CHECK VALVE, FILTER, TEE 00001609 219268 S173087 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS, 189.25 326343 9/312009 121357 STARK, KRISTI 135.00 WEBSITE GRAPHICS 219159 KS —EDINA -016 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 135.00 326344 9/312009 124430 STERNITZKE, RAQUEL 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219305 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 180:00 326345 9/3/2009 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 16,712.03 CONSULTING SERVICES 219466 7954 5500.1705 CONSTR:'IN PROGRESS 16,712.03 326346 9/3/2009 _ 106452 STONE, HOLLY 366.25 INSTRUCTOR AC 219306 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL-SERVICES 366.25 326347 91312009 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 248.48 LOUVRE PANELS 00001956 219269 27024 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 23 Business Unit ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT s� R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA .9/2/2009 7:47:29 - Council Check Register Page - 24 9/3/2009 -9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 231.15 SLEEVE IMPELLER, REAMER 00001857 219270 27023 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 479.63 326348 9/3/2009 101015 STREICHERS 124.94 BOOTS 00003582 219160 1653679 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 124.94 326349 9/3/2609 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 9/10/09 219430 082709 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 - 326350 9/3/2009 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 49.96 TIE DOWN 00001147 219161 191240 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS- EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.34 HANDLE 00001145 219162 190855 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 86.18 COVER KIT 00001227 219163 184884- = 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.73 KEY, DEFLECTOR 00005124 219271 192197 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.21 326351 91312009 100900 SUN_ NEWSPAPERS 67.93 AD FOR BID 219164 1198997 1120.6120 AD' VERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 28.60 CC'PHN 9 -1 -09 219165 1200322 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 42.90 PC PHN 9 -2 -09 219166 1200323 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 53.63 PUBLISH ORD 2009 -08 219167 1200320 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 35.75 PUBLISH ORD 2009 -09 219168 1200321 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 'ADMINISTRATION 228.81 326352 91312009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 420.00 219212 20154 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 348.00 219213 20153 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 677.00 219531 20156 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,445.00 326353 9/3/2009 105441 SUSA 100.00 MEMBERSHIP - GARY WELLS 219357 082809 5913.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DISTRIBUTION 100.00 MEMBERSHIP - ROGER GLANZER 219358 8/28109 5913.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DISTRIBUTION 200.00 326354 9/3/2009 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 219100 090109 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 326355 913/2009 124608 SWANTON, LISA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/212009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/3/2009 -9/3/2009 - Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 429.00 CURTAIN REPAIR 219431 1001 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 429.00 326356 91312009 116482 - THAYER, TIMOTHY R. 385.00 CPR TRAINING 219432 9002 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 385.00 326357 91312009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 264.55 219169 556164 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 7,240.00 219532 556773 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 143.50 219533 556774 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX " VERNON SELLING 7,648.05 - 326358 9/3/2009 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 219433 2009 -27395 5822.6122 ADVERTISING'OTHER, 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 219433 2009 -27395 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 219433 2009 -27395 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 326359 913/2009 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 61.34 WELDING SUPPLIES 219170 276723 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. CENTENNIAL LAKES 61.34 326360 9/3/2009 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 11,889.84 FURNISH /INSTALL BATTING CAGE 00001579 219434 22427 47064.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK BATTING.CAGES 11,889:84 326361 9/3/2009 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 84.86 LOADSWITCHES 00001944 219171 0000038621 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS • 84.86 326362 9/3/2009 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY . 125.00 219214 223578 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 190.00 219534 223577 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 315.00 326363 9/3/2009 124597 TUORILA, SHERYL 150.00 GALLERY ASSISTANCE 219307 082709 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 150.00 326364 91312009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC " 656.23 REEL MOTOR 00006095 219467 J119830 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS -: RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE r R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Council Check Register Page - 26 9/312009 -9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description Business Unit 241.75 CABLES 219468 S120210 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 897.98 326365 9/312009 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 693.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 219435 101583209 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 693.00 326366 91312009 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 37.41 GRASS SEED 00001903 219436 21773 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 37.41 326367 9/3/2009 124595 TYLER, TOM 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 219308 082709 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.00 326368 913/2009 101049 UHL COMPANY 494.50 SERVICE CONTRACT 219359 44025 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 456.00 FURNACE SET UP 00001706 219469 44187 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 950.50 326369 9/3/2009 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 126.39 OXYGEN 00003649 219470 135071 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 126.39 326370 9/312009 124596 VALUE TRAVEL INC. 3,000.00 SICILY TOUR DEPOSIT 00009080 219360 030731 5110.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3,000.00 326371 9/3/2009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 913.78 ROLL TOWELS, LINERS, CUPS 219172 132129 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 395.34 LIQUOR BAGS 219173 132130 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 5.69- CREDIT 219471 132737CM 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,303.43 326372 913/2009 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 186.00 219395 28016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 186.00 326373 9/312009 119454 VINOCOPIA 245.17 219215 0017825 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 166.00 219508 0017969 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 494.00 219508 0017969 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 894.08 VERNON SELLING 905.17 285525 326374 9/3/2009 219400 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 46.24- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5.34 SCREWDRIVER 2,183.39 YORK SELLING 261.85 LIGHTING 2,936.56 267.19 326375 91312009 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 159.24 WEBSITE ORDERS 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 159.24 100.00 326376 91312009 116516 WELDON, KEN 2,292.54 84.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 461.35 84.00 278225 326377 9/3/2009 219220 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 298.35 576.65 SEPT 2009 MAINTENANCE 2,128.19 576.65 276659 326378 9/3/2009 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 282.30 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 -9/3/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00005103 219174 15136165 -00 1301.6556 TOOLS 00005103 219174 15136165 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 27 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL 219099 090109 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 219309 082709 219175 090109 219216 224198 -00 219535 224617 -00 219536 224535 -00 326379 91312009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS YORK SELLING 5862.5513 894.08 VERNON SELLING 219217 285525 94.67- 5842.5513 219400 44147 46.24- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 219401 44234 2,183.39 YORK SELLING 219509 286320 2,936.56 326380 9/3/2009 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 WEBSITE ORDERS 219437 285 159.24 326382 9/3/2009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,292.54 219218 278224 461.35 219219 278225 32.52 219220 278223 298.35 219221 278222 2,128.19 219222 276659 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9/3/2009 - 9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,287.65 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 219223 275071 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 719.15 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 219224 275068 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 67.05- COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 219225 783531 5842.5512 147.83- 219226 783532 5822.5512 2,921.33 219396 278219 5862.5512 258.16 219397 278813 5842.5512 119.48 219398 279612 5842.5512 241.95 219399 279591 5842.5512 52.00 219510 278218 5862.5515 96.93 219511 278230 5842.5515 2,709.47 219541 278221 5862.5513 1,914.60 219542 278217 5862.5513 938.70 219543 280327 5862.5512 1,105.31 219544 275066 5822.5512 30.32- 219545 784108 5822.5515 26.01- 219546 784168 5822.5515 78.65- 219547 784169 5822.5512 26.01- 219548 784170 5822.5515 20,201.81 326383 9/312009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,087.40 219231 234116 5822.5513 16.00- 219402 233973 5842.5513 2,137.25 219549 234115 5862.5513 3,208.65 326384 9/3/2009 120223 WORTHINGTON, HEATHER 149.00 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 219272 082609 1120.6104 878.74 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 219272 082609 1460.6406 1,027.74 326385 9/3/2009 112752 WPS- MEDICARE PART B 337.67 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 219438 DONALD KELLEHER 1470.4329 337.67 326386 91312009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 58.42 51- 4420190 -3 219439 207833261 1321.6185 10,341.71 51- 6955679 -8 219473 208218365 1551.6185 12,248.81 51- 6644819 -9 219474 208043744 5620.6185 22,648.94 326387 91" ' 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 28 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CIVILIAN DEFENSE AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/3/2009 — 9/3/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 156.39 JULY USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 219361 042036839 1550.6151 32.49 JULY USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00004322 219362 042036838 1550.6151 263.46- RETURN 219440 107438357 1260.6406 224.48 DRUM FOR FAX MACHINE 219441 106773499 1260.6406 149.90 326388 91312009 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 143.79 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 219363 54065005 7411.6406 143.79 326389 9/3/2009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 3,957.60 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 219472 E6564501 1470.6215 3,957.60 Subledger Account Description EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 387,811.32 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 387,811.32 Total Payments 387,811.32 9/2/2009 7:47:29 Page - 29 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 9/3/2009 - 9/3/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 68,308.41 02100 CDBG FUND 15,900.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,161.14 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 49,234.52 05100 ART CENTER FUND 25,070.69 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,482.41 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,547.93 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 9,313.10 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 22,125.07 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 24,753.32 05800 LIQUOR FUND 119,570.48 05900 UTILITY FUND 38,638.39 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 8,818.96 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,886.90 Report Totals 387,811.32 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici a d Procedures ld t 9 r,-3 a anager 91212009 7:48:35 Page- 1 J R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 326390 9110/2009 124613 ABM JANITORIAL- NORTH CENTRAL 2,535.61 JANITORIAL SERVICE 219629 323739 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2.535.61 326391 9/10/2009 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 9/9/2009 8:31:44'. Page - 1 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL 50.15 219849 0803730 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 31.00 219850. 0722778 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 41.40 219978 0722777 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 105.60 219979 0803720 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 35.40 219980 0803734 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 57.20 219981 0722779 5862.5515 COST OF, GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 320.75 312.50 K9 VET CARE 219650 104915 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 326392 9110/2009 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 312.50 122.87 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 219649 6880 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ' 122.87 3263931, 9/1012009 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 32.92 ALARM SERVICE 219775 98242123 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE 32.92. 326394 9/1012009 124616 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY VET SERVI 312.50 K9 VET CARE 219650 104915 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 312.50 326395 9110/2009 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC'INC. 2,397.60 FLAG POLE LIGHTING 00002112 220043 6332 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,486.70 WIRING REPAIRS 00002105 220044 6324 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,884.30 326396 9/10/2009 124623 AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION 986.94 UPS REPAIR 219791 6000868 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 986.94 326397 9/1012009 118171 AMERICAN PRESSURE INC. 39.29 TRIGGER GUN 00001996 219630 58007 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 39.29 326398 9/10/2009 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 42.57 219631 083109 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 92.17 219631 083109 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 110.58 219631 083109 5861.6201 LAUNDRY ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 2 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 114.58 219631 083109 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 132.04 219631 083109 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 227.65 219631 083109 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 308.37 219631 083109 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,027.96 326399 9/1012009 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 1,199.87 FOOD 219673 121058 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,199.87 326400 9/1012009 102566 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC 53.25 DISPLAY SUN SHIELDS 00003167 219674 177694 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 53.25 326401 9/10/2009 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 86.96 COFFEE 219675 413640 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 127.04 COFFEE 219910 413730 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 214.00 326402 9/10/2009 119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 30.00 EBROCHURE 00006324 219909 16651 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 30.00 326403 9/10/2009 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 144.28 MONITORING SERVICE 00001923 219792 137039 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.19 MONITORING SERIVCE 00001922 219793 137040 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.47 326404 911012009 124621 ARVIN, SHIDA 70.00 CLASS REFUND 219774 090209 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 70.00 326405 911012009 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 147.19 CONTROL BOX ASSEMBLY 00001995 220045 10058876 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 147.19 326406 9110/2009 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 180.94 219911 1- 146354 -9/09 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 40.27 219912 090109 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 40.95 219912 090109 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 56.12 219912 090109 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 56.22 219912 090109 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 81.72 82.38 86.22 91.97 102.24 185.62 196.92 232.87 233.25 234.40 264.90 264.91 374.86 430.62 586.17 3,823.55 326407 911012009 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1,007.30 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 219912 090109 5841.6182 219912 090109 5861.6182 219912 090109 5430.6182 219912 090109 1628.6182 219912 090109 1470.6182 219912 090109 5511.6182 219912 090109 5422.6182 219912 090109 1551.6182 219912 090109 1645.6182 219912 090109 1645.6182 219912 090109 1301.6182 219912 090109 1552.6182 219912 090,109 5311.6182 219912 090109 5420.6182 219912 090109 5620.6182 326407 911012009 120995 AVR INC. 1,007.30 READY-MIX 00005448 219794 24585 725.15 READY MIX 00005448 219795 24503 637.24 READY MIX 00005448 219796 24664 1,493.58 READY MIX 00005448 219797 24943 2,987.15 READY MIX 00005448 219797 24943 1,146.23 READY MIX 00005448 219798 24805 2,014.59 READY MIX 00005448 219799 25228 1,736.72 READY MIX 00005448 219800 25136 1,111.50 READY MIX 00005448 219801 25042 12,859.46 326408 9/10/2009 124619'-BARNARD,JIM 73.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219776 090109 73.15 326409 9110/2009 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 279.37 BATTERIES 00005163 219676 C10454 279.37 5932.6520 5932.6520 1314.6520 5932.6520 05496.1705.31 5913.6520 5932.6520 5913.6520 5932.6520 5410.6107 Subledger Account Description RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE MATERIALS /SUPPLIES CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANC 9/912009 8:31:44 Page - 3 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MAINT-.OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL OPERATION CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION GENERAL STORM SEWER WM496 XERXES CEMENT LINING DISTRIBUTION GENERAL STORM SEWER DISTRIBUTION GENERAL STORM SEWER E GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 326410 9110/2009 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,377.38 219604 50204300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105.91- 219605 50199100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 293.93 219732 50194900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 182.85 219982 82670100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 4 9/10/2009 - 9/1012009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,748.25 326411 9110/2009 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 84.50 ART WORK SOLD 219766 090109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 84.50 326412 9/1012009 115067 BENSON, RON PAUL 130.00 ART WORK SOLD 219767 , 090109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 130.00 326413 9/10/2009 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 123.19 UNIFORM PURCHASE 219913 090309 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 123.19 326414 9/10/2009 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 165.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 219550 WO- 575981 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 12.79 SHEET PROTECTORS 219551 WO- 575923 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 53.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 219552 WO- 574498 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 17.87 PENS 219553 WO- 574498 -2 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 36.82 ENVELOPES 219677 WO- 576567 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 130.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009064 219777 OE- 200963 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 122.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 219914 OE- 203906 -1 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 539.52 326415 9110/2009 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 94.28 TOILET SERVICE 00001929 219915 17784 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 94.28 326416 9/1012009 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 98.36 BINDERS, SCREWDRIVER SET 00005134 219554 53061 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 59.83 TONER 00005238 219678 53127 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 46.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00005241 219802 53208 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 204.48 326417 911012009 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 6.43 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 19.29 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 19.40 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 24.95 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 42.91 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 45.00 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 45.39 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATE^" R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 57.99 PETTY CASH 219916 090309 5430.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 261.36 326418 9/10/2009 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 503.48 DOOR REPAIRS 219555 511428S 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 591.84 DOOR REPAIR 220046 511426S 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,095.32 326419 9/10/2009 124615 BUFFALO COMPANION ANIMAL CLINI 931.65 K9 VET CARE 219679 49297 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 931.65 326420 911012009 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 5,669.69 ASPHALT 00005445 219680 7442MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 5,669.69 326421 911012009 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 216.42 MERCHANDISE 219917 919016978 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 78.56 MERCHANDISE 219918 918199846 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 294.98 326422 9/10/2009 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 109.90 219681 16478 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 8,177.90 219733 16550 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 68.20 219734 16548 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 27.45 219735 16545 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,038.90 219736 16546 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,422.35 326423 9/10/2009 100453 CASUAL CONTRACT 3,497.00 DOWN PMT FOR DECK FURNITURE 00006327 219778 090109 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 3,497.00 326424 9/10/2009 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 208.00 219851 83349 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, VERNON SELLING 600.00 219983 83326 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 808.00 326425 9/1012009 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 118.91 CURE & SEAL 00005108 219556 1198665 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 118.91 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 6 9/10/2009 -9110/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326426 9/10/2009 124629 CHRISTIAN, PAUL 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/15/09 220039 090409 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING SUPERVISION &OVERHEAD COST OF GOODS SOLD 150.00 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CRAFT SUPPLIES 326427 9110/2009 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 225.00 POLYGRAPH TEST 219919 45568 1400.6103 225.00 326428 9/10/2009 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 2,000.89 LABORATORY SERVICES 220047 090309 5915.6136 2,000.89 326429 9/10/2009 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 492.28 DOOR LINERS, LENS 00001636 219557 127986 1553.6530 789.24 PROXIMITY SWITCHES, STRAPS 00001659 219682 128425 1553.6530 1,281.52 326430 9110/2009 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 851.90 219984 0148064921 5842.5515 851.90 326431 9110/2009 120433 COMCAST 88.32 8772 10 614 0177449 219683 177449- 8/09 5420.6188 74.95 8772 10 614 016567 219684 165667- 8/09 5424.6406 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 219685 199138 -8/09 5422.6188 82.63 8772 10 614 0164959 219686 164959- 8/09 5430.6188 304.90 326432 911012009 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 444.79 GLOVES, PENLIGHTS 00005127 219558 03521107 1280.6806 444.79 326433 911012009 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 837.18 CLAY 00009061 219779 INV000045906 5120.5510 158.30 KILN PARTS 00009069 219780 R200356323 5111.6530 43.20 SHELF CLEANING BLOCKS 00009071 219781 INV000046198 5111.6406 167.45 FELDSPAR, STRONTIUM BICARB 00009071 219781 INV000046198 5110.6564 1,206.13 326434 9/10/2009 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF 353.54 SOD 00002312 219803 1825 5630.6540 353.54 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING SUPERVISION &OVERHEAD COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 9/912009 8:31:44 Page - 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 326439 9/10/2009= 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 219606 518905 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 44.80 219607 518906 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX " 1,630.45 219738 518903 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # _ "Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No < 326435 9110/2009: 517856 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Y; 474.00 219853 519030 1,675.00 SHIRTS FOR RESALE 220048 4960 5620.5510 518902 5862.5515 1,675.00 3,371.00 219986 518901 326436 911012009. - 12,645.15 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 326440 9/1012009 27,831.32 VENTRAC TRACTOR 00001141 220049'. 147653 1305.6710 66.39 BAKERY 27,831.32 309650 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 42.42 326437 9110/2009: 309761 104020 DALCO COST OF GOODS SOLD " 43.32 BAKERY 219689 310080 859.54 " WYPALLS, ROLL TOWEL, LINERS 00005117 219559 2127501 1552.6511 310134 5421.5510 95.12 SOAP 00005117 219632 2128181 1552.6511 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 954.66 BAKERY 219692 310464 5421.5510 326438 911012009 BAKERY 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 461.75' 344.67 219737 828172 5842.5514 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 240.00 219852 828177 5842.5514 F0893012 4086.6103 584.67 9/912009 8:31:44 Page - 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 326439 9/10/2009= 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 6,165.30 219606 518905 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 44.80 219607 518906 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX " 1,630.45 219738 518903 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ' 22.40 219739 518904 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 870.00. 219740 517856 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Y; 474.00 219853 519030 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 67.20 219985 518902 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD, MIX 3,371.00 219986 518901 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - 12,645.15 326440 9/1012009 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 66.39 BAKERY 219687 309650 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 42.42 BAKERY 219688 309761 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD " 43.32 BAKERY 219689 310080 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 117.52 BAKERY 219690 310134 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 110.43 BAKERY 219691 310156 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 54.09 BAKERY 219692 310464 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 27.58 BAKERY 219920 310592 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 461.75' _ 326441 9/10/2009 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 250.00 AERATION PERMIT FEE 00001925-219921 F0893012 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT,SVC'PW BUILDING CENT- SVC'PW BUILDING. YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL AQUATIC WEEDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 8 9/10/2009 — 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250.00 326442 9/10/2009 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 250.00 AERATION PERMIT FEE 00001924 219922 F0893072 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 250.00 326443 911012009 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,302.55 REFUSE 219560 1010863 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,496.21 REFUSE 219561 1014203 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 6,798.76 326444 911012009 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 219768 090109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 326445 911012009 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 30.86 MERCHANDISE 219923 422540 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 34.11 MERCHANDISE 219924 422192 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 64.97 326446 9110/2009 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 2,390.00 ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 220050 090409 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 2,390.00 326447 9110/2009 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 26.44 TAPE, HOOKS 00009076 219782 80622 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 26.44 326448 9110/2009 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 450.00 MN DISTANCE RUNNING 219925 090309 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 450.00 326449 9/10/2009 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 670.05 E -81 REPAIRS 219804 44406 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 670.05 326450 9/10/2009 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 499.45 FOOD 219693 6588060 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 499.45 326451 9110/2009 102387 FBINA 105.00 DUES 220051 090809 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAi_ RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 9 ' 9/10/2009 —9110/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105.00 326452 9110/2009 102387 FBINA 115.00 ASSESSMENT FEES 220052 SEPT809 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 115.00 326453 911012009 105420 FIKES SERVICES: 39.54 AIR DEODORIZERS 219694 66322 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 39.54 326454 9/10/2009 101475 FOOTJOY 73.00 SHOES 219926 5770365 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 73.00 326455 9/10/2009 105172 GARLAND'S INC. ' 52.01 PNEUMATIC WHEEL 00005145 219805 5116589 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 52.01 326456 9/10/2009 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 558.97 MERCHANDISE 219927 11327746 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 558.97 326457 9110/2009 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 71.90 ROOT FEEDER 220053 1014001812 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK ' 71.90 326458 9/1012009 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 28.87 PHONES 219806 1658390 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 28.87 326459 9/1012009 124471 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC. 8,925.00 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX SURVE 220054 1205 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 4,900.00 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX SURVE 220055 1213 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 13,825.00 326460 9/10/2009 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,064.30 AUGUST SERVICE 00005048 220056 9080466 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION - 1,064.30 i. 326461 9/10/2009 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE ' 11.25 BLACKBOARD LABELS 00003579 219807 65884 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 10 9/10/2009 —9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326462 9110/2009 101103 GRAINGER 239.77 EMERGENCY LIGHTING UNITS 219928 9063452727 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 348.90 MARKING PAINT, TAPE 00005139 220057 9066040222 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 588.67 326463 9/10/2009 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 139.00 219854 00023676 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 139.00 326464 911012009 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 204.50 219608 111791 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,387.00 219855 111790 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 442.75 219987 112215 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,034.25 326465 9/10/2009 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 14.29 TOGGLE BOLTS & ANCHORS 219929 090309 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 40.00 CARDING INSENTIVE 219929 090309 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 54.29 326466 911012009 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 119.62 SENSORS 00005118 219808 943133594 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.62 326467 9/1012009 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 43.55 ART WORK SOLD 219769 090109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 43.55 326468 911012009 124620 GRIFFIN, SANDRA 49.40 ART WORK SOLD 219770 090109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 49.40 326469 9110/2009 100788 H &L MESABI 2,482.71 BLADES 00001151 219809 78239 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,482.71 326470 9/10/2009 100797 HAWKINS INC. 6,706.95 CHEMICALS 00005451 219810 3052356 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,501.25 TONKAZORB 00005451 219811 3052371 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 9,208.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 91912009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 11 9/1012009 —9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326471 9110/2009 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 504.18 ETCHING STONE 219930 695740 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 504.18 326472 911012009 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 241.25 PIZZA 219931 1701296 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 241.25 326473 9110/2009 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 210.24 MEAT PATTIES 219695 021969 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 210.24 326474 911012009 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 219562 OB10689 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 326475 911012009 120443 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 185.00 REGISTRATION FEE 220058 090209 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 185.00 326476 9/1012009 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 90.00 CHAIR REPAIRS 219563 436077 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 90.00 326477 9/1012009 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 1,223.09 COMPUTERS 00003168 219696 46415624 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8,561.68 COMPUTERS 00003166 219697 46395814 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 616.67 PC 8 LCD FOR SCANNER 00004343 219783 46423651 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 10,401.44 326478 9110/2009 124630 HOAR, JIM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/20/09 220042 090409 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 326479 9/10/2009 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 302.00 219856 497143 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 302.00 326480 9110/2009 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 552.44 CAL HYPO TABLETS 00002109 220059 9082731 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 451.76- RETURN 220060 CR9083192 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 100.68 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 326481 911012009 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 525.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219932 090309 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1120.6107 5915.6530 1400.6406 4402.6710 1553.6710 5842.5514 5430.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5515 5862.5512 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page- .12 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR E911 WATER TREATMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL GRILL GRILL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 525.00 . 326482 9/10/2009 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 289.30 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219564 090109 289.30 326483 9110/2009 124614 IDEAL SEATING INC. 2,463.75 DISPATCH CHAIRS 219698 3300026 2,463.75 326484 9110/2009 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 4.96 NIPPLES 00005152 219812 576273 4.96 326485 9/10/2009 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 144.00 HRDW BREATH MANIFOLD ASSEMBLY 219933 284145 144.00 326486 9/10/2009 124628 J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION 87,056.00 PW PRECONSTRUCTION 220062 8115 -1 87,056.00 326487 9/1012009 104198 JACK MCCLARD 8 ASSOCIATES INC. 4,836.09 WHEEL BALANCER 00000144 219565 018441 4,836.09 326488 9/1012009 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,843.35 219609 1304738 234.35 219699 957694 268.00 219700 1314040 268.00 219701 1309173 235.00 219702 1308070 876.95 219741 957724 1,466.17 219742 1304736 4,677.05 219857 1304776 13,007.50 219858 1304784 99.35 219859 1304785 71.80 219988 1304775 67.50 219989 1300277 1120.6107 5915.6530 1400.6406 4402.6710 1553.6710 5842.5514 5430.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5515 5862.5512 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page- .12 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR E911 WATER TREATMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL GRILL GRILL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page - 13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit' 9,393.05 219990 1304774 _ 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 36,508.07 326490 9/10/2009 100835, JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 6,119.87 219610 1688566 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.36 219611 - 1688557 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,624.23 219612 1688563 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.12 219613 1688556 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,934.57 219614 1688560 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING' 1,789.91 219615 1688561 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 456.76 219860 1692669 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 472.32 219861 .1688558 5862.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,485.56 219862 1688569 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 'VERNON SELLING 572.33 219863 1688568 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,741.00 219864 1688570 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.11 219865 1692687 5862.5515 COST OF'GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,075.19 219866 1692685 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,151.94 219867 1692683 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,701.60 219868 1692688 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .09 219869 1692675 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,293.26 219870 1692689 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,027.79 219871 1692686 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 223.74 219872 1692682 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,755.92 219991 1692681 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,385.03 219992 1692679 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 121.12 219993 1692676 5842.5512 ', COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,250.11 219994 1692680 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,726.05 219995 1692678 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 958.02 219996 1692670 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 505.31 219997 1692671 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 274.37 219998 1692672 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4.12- 219999 1451519C 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 26.02- 220000 1528200C 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 42,728.54 326491 9/1012009 101322 JULIEN, DIANE 36:95 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 219633 083109 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC,PW BUILDING 36.95 326492 911012009 111018 KEEPRS INC. 39.99 UNIFORMS 00003566 219813 123696 =01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL. 153.98 UNIFORMS 00003570 220063 123695 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS _ FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 ^ Council Check Register Page - 14 9/10/2009 — 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No — Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 193.97 326493 911012009 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 168.00 AUGUST SERVICE 219814 080109 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 168.00 326494 911012009 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC 14,364.65 .FA -2 00005443 219703 203217 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL 8 ROCK STREET RENOVATION 14,364.65 326495 .911012009 122446 LACKAS, TIM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/22/09 220040 090409 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - 'OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00, 326496 9/10/2009 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 70.32 BOLTS, GAUGES 00002096:V9815 199788 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 35.16 GAUGES, BOLTS 00002088 219816 199453 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS'_' CENTENNIAL LAKES 105.46 326497 911012009 124611 LARSCO'INC. 182.21 CHECK VALVES, O -RINGS 00005131. 219634 2574 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 182.21 / - 326498 9/10/2009 121152 LEA, STEVE 150.00. CONCERT 6/22/09 219817 083109 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 326499 9/10/2009 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 24,001.00 DUES 219818 133285 1120.6105 DUES $ SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 24,001.00 326500 9/1012009 117681 LINDSTROM EMBROIDERY INC. 528.00 UNIFORMS 00003589 219819 3997 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 528.00 326501 9/10/2009 124570 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER 450.00 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR COURSE 00005240 219704 090209 ", 1640.6104 CONFERENCES'& SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 450.00 326502_ 911012009 124617 LRIS 595.00 REGISTRATION FEE 219705 082809 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 595.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 15 9/10/2009 — 9/1012009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326503 911012009 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 2,079.01 220001 69426 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,079.01 326504 .911012009' 103190 M.G.I.A.` 40.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 219706 082509 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 326505 9H0/2009 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 222.48 DISINFECTANT CLEANER 00003586 219820 .1663 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 222.48 326506 911012009 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 79.17 COLLARS 00001981 219566 2094828 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,140.25 ROLLER WELD, BUSHINGS 00001657 219567 2094825 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.03 SCREWS 00001657 219635 2094868 — 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,019.94 SWEEPER BROOMS 00005148 219821 2094953 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 3,283.39 326507 9/1012009- 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 473.49 JANITORIAL SERVICE 219934 C003868 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 473.49 326508 9110/2009 120502 'MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 'SOLUTIO 399.38 HARDRIVE UPGRADE 219708 1620 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 399.38 326509 9/1012009 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 2,400.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 219822 6650 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 400.00 POLICE ASSESSMENT 219935 6649 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2.800.00 326510 9/1012009 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 80330 PLANTS 00002103 220064 46605 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 803.70 326511 9110/2009 123868 MCCORMICK & SCHMICK'S 1,583.81 DEPOSIT REFUND 219936 090809 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,583.81 326512 9/10/2009 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 16 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,702.50 TITANIC EXHIBITION TRIP 219823 082109 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,702.50 326513 9/1012009 101483 MENARDS 49.25 PAINT 00002020 219824 74859 5630.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES 52.37 SCREEN, BOARDS 00002020 219825 74542 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 245.00 NAILS, LUMBER 00001907 219826 74849 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 226.36 NAILS, LUMBER 00001912 219827 75438 1646.6406 .. GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 572.98 326514 911012009 101987 MENARDS 34.91 BATTERIES, PRUNER 00002213 220065 13147 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 34.91 326515 9/1012009 102281 MENARDS 96.55 TOOLBOXES 00005144 219828 29503 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 96.55 326516 9/10/2009 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 344,406.11 SEWER SERVICE 219937 0000908262 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 344,406.11 326517 9/10/2009 104650 MICRO CENTER 74.79 HARD DRIVES 00004342 219784 2366886 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 74.79 326518 9/10/2009 102481 MIDLAND HEATING & AIR CONDITIO 1,980.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 219830 1372920 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 1,980.00 326519 9110/2009 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 150.07 ASPHALT 00005445 219709 101263MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 237.26 ASPHALT 00005445 219709 101263MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 4,764.71 ASPHALT 00005445 219709 101263MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 298.95 ASPHALT 00005445 219710 101416MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 461.46 ASPHALT 00005445 219710 101416MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 9,390.42 ASPHALT 00005445 219710 101416MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 224.02 ASPHALT 00005445 219711 101088MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 15,526.89 326520 9/10/2009 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 19.95 CARBON DIOXIDE 219938 R108090128 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/912009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 17 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22.53 CARBON DIOXIDE, METHANE 219939 R108090283 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 42.48 326521 9/1012009 103765 MINNESOTA EMSRB 438.00 AMBULANCE LICENSES 219940 090109 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 438.00 326522 9/1012009 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 175.02 MAIL MACHINE INK CARTRIDGE 219785 58880 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 175.02 326523 9110/2009 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 2,306.05 HYDRANT PARTS 00005045 219568 0241312 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 2,464.11 9-HYDRANT 00005121 219569 0243768 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 3,173.12 1" WATER METERS 00005044 219636 0244080 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 5,318.27 WATER METERS 00005040 219637 0244079 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 5,318.27 WATER METERS 00005040 219637 0244079 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 18,579.82 326524 9/1012009 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,240.82 CSS-1H ASPHALT EMULSION 00005449 219712 59895 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 316.62 CRS 11 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005449 219713 59873 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 253.29 CRS II ASPHALT EMULSION 00005449 219714 59856 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,810.73 326525 9110/2009 121398 MMRF #3660 80.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 219707 082709 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 326526 9/1012009 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 585.88 CONTROL 00005156 219570 471424F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.17 LOCK ASSEMBLY 00005162 219715 471542F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.38 TORSION BARS 00005163 219831 471551F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 677.43 326527 9/10/2009 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 PERFORMANCE AT EP 220041 090409 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 326528 9/10/2009 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES I 300.76 REGULATOR VALVE 00003587 219829 001 19299 SNV 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.76 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 18 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326529 9/10/2009 124612 NEAL, JOHN 84.83 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 219638 090109 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 84.83 326530 9/10/2009 104350 NIKE USA INC. 176.40 MERCHANDISE 219941 921309933 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 729.48 MERCHANDISE 219942 921309934 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP. PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 346.72 MERCHANDISE 219943 921582047 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 470.25 MERCHANDISE 219944 921838908 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 394.87 MERCHANDISE 219945 921908540 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 640.38 MERCHANDISE 219946 921838909 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 248.14 MERCHANDISE 219947 922031069 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,006.24 326531 9110/2009 124624 NORTH STATES WINDOW & DOOR SOL 483.16 WINDOW REPAIR 00001179 219948 2155 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 483.16 326532 9/1012009 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 696.80 GV BOX EXTENSION 00005126 219639 S01216168.001 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 696.80 326533 9110/2009 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 127.15 BRUSHES, ARTISTS OIL 00009070 219786 37746301 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 61.05 PANELS 219787 37673400 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 188.20 326534 911012009 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 43.63 REGISTER PAPER 00006034 219716 1121063180 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 35.12 REGISTER PAPER 00006034 219717 1123485426 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 192.36 FAX MACHINE 00002307 219832 485457508001 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 271.11 326535 911012009 102265 OLSON, TIM 75.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 219718 090109 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.97 326536 9/10/2009 123786 OLSON, VICKI 33.80 ART WORK SOLD 219771 090109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 33.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST.OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, =• VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount . Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 326537 9110/2009 VERNON SELLING 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - YORK SELLING 225.30 PEST CONTROL 219571 48364055 1551.6180 225.30 326538 9/1012009 101718 PARTS PLUS 2,637.62 AUTO PARTS 219719 083109 1553.6530 2,637.62 326539 911012009; 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,283.25 219616 8232400 -IN 5842.5513 682.15 219873 8233159 -IN 5822.5513 39.00 219874 8232766 -IN 5862.5513 1,968.41 219875 8233163 -IN 5862.5513 31.00 219876 8233171 -IN 5862.5515 3,280.27 220002 8233172 -IN 5842:5513 7,284.08 326540 9/1012009 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 698.35- 219720 54914659 5320.5510 525.97 219721 54914648 5421.5510 747.84 219722 54914701 5421.5510 208.20 219833 53743912 5630.5510 326542 911012009 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,851.03 , 1.12 1,640.69 1,946.53 98.24 125.60 3,845.30 227.84- INV PD TWICE 343.84 1,428.21 417.71 921.54 53.47 - 28.58- 18.60- 25.00- 3,073.58 219617 2799687 219618 2800330 219619 2799689 219743 2799695 219744 2799692 219745 2799693 219746 2799691 219747 2722788C 219877 2802820 219878 2802829 219879 2802826 219880. 2802828 219881 3418733 219882 3419268 219883 3418916 219884 3419267 220003 2802823 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS�SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING POOL CONCESSIONS GRILL GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST.OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF'GOODS SOLD WINE:,: VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, =• VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST.,OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD. WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 20 9/10/2009 -9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 63.62 220004 2802819 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,105.78 220005 2802821 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 98.24 220006 2802822 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 674.08 220007 2802824 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21.12 220008 2802825 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 49.12 220009 2802817 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 611.74 220010 2802818 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,035.93 220011 2802816 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19,999.53 326543 9/1012009 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 1,697.86 TOP DRESSING 00001928 219949 30306 1642.6543 SOD & 13LACK DIRT FIELD MAINTENANCE 906.67 TOP DRESSING 219950 30306 1642.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,604.53 326544 911012009 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC. 958.67 TUNNEL SLIDE 00001809 219834 1400135966 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 958.67 326545 911012009 100958 PLUNKET17S PEST CONTROL 44.52 PEST CONTROL 219951 1329272 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.52 326546 9110/2009 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 165.00 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 00001860 219835 27241 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,067.04 TIRES 00005161 219836 27561 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 791.90 TIRES 00005159 219837 27211 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 269.05 TIRES, O -RING 00001860 219838 27235 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,292.99 326547 9110/2009 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 219839 090309 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 326548 9/10/2009 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 12.61 CYLINDER RENTAL 219952 34183141 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 12.61 326549 9110/2009 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. 120.00 REPAIR SEAT CUSHION 00005245 219840 16755 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 120.00 R55CKREG L0620000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/1012009 -9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger 'Account Description 326550 9/1012009 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,586.75 MATS, TISSUE, LINERS 00002107 220066 4579 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1,586.75 9/912009 8:31:44 Page - 21 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK 326551 9/10/20091 100971 QUALITY WINE 239.40 219620 198543 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS :SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 864.90 219621 197627 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,001.00 219748 198421 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 427.00 219749 200581 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,752.68- 219750 201207 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 128.10 219751 200582 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 428.67 219752 201208 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 416.53 219753 201427 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10,669.11 219790 201468 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,823.75 219885 201425 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 121.60 219886 201547 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,408.80 219887 201469 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,776.41 219888 201426 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 347.20 220012 202190 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 470.70 220013 200580 -00 5842.5513 COST OFGOODS'SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,888.80 220014 201467 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17.69- 220015 194788 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45,746.96 326552 9/1012009 123898 QWEST 55.57 952 929 -0297 219640 0297 -8/09 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 78.64 952 929 -9549 219641 9549 -8/09 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 218.95 952 927 -8861 219642 8861 -8/09 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.21 952 922 -9246 219723 9246 -8/09 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.76 220067 082809 5911.6188 TELEPHONE . WELL PUMPS 58.46 220067 082809 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 78.64 220067 082809 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 83.76 220067 082809 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 83.76 220067 082809 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 98.81 220067 082809 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 107.04 220067 082809 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 117.02 220067 082809 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 165.60 220067 082809 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING B HOCKEY 234.4.5 220067 082809 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE. 255.81 220067 082809 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 266,14 220067 082809 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,152.07 220067 082809 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/10/2009 — 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,150.69 326553 9/10/2009 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 STAIRWELL CLEANING 00005251 220068 615 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD SNOW & LAWN CARE CUSTOMER REFUND ART WORK SOLD 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page- 22 Business Unit PARKING RAMP ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL GRILL GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES 2,009.25 326564 9/1012009 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 172.20 AD FOR BID 219572 4229431 1120.6120 319.80 AD FOR BID 219573 4230628 1120.6120 492.00 326555 9/10/2009 124622 REMAX ASSOCIATES PLUS 160.96 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 219841 091608 5900.2015 160.96 326556 9/1012009 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 2,495.53 AERATION, SEEDING 00001897 219842 33774 1642.6103 2,495.53 326557 9/10/2009 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 112.80 PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT 00005150 219643 MB02653341 1553.6406 112.80 326558 9110/2009 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 48.90 BAKERY 219724 258522 5421.5510 48.90 BAKERY 219725 258956 5421.5510 34.10 BAKERY 219726 258959 5421.5510 131.90 326559 9/10/2009 124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE 520.31 LAWN SERVICE 219953 105 7411.6136 520.31 326560 9/1012009 124625 SCHLACTENHAUFEN, HAROLD 90.95 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 219954 090309 5900.2015 90.95 326561 9/10/2009 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 66.30 ART WORK SOLD 219772 090109 5101.4413 66.30 326562 911012009 121382 SIGNATURE AQUATICS ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD SNOW & LAWN CARE CUSTOMER REFUND ART WORK SOLD 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page- 22 Business Unit PARKING RAMP ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL GRILL GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 23 - 9/10/2009 - 9/1012009 - 7 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account'Description Business Unit' 130.00 CHLORINATOR REPAIR 00002108 220069 160 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL"SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 130.00 326563 9/10/2009 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 1,854.77 BASKETBALL PROGRAM 219574 324923976 1600.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL .1,854.77- ' 326564 911012009•, 123112 SMITH, HAMILTON 75.00 CLASS REFUND 193913 082108 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES '. 75.00 326565 9/10/2009 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTER 320.63 CARPET CLEANING 219955 090309 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 213.75.. CARPET CLEANING 219956 611 `' 5841.6162 SERVICES. CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 213.75 CARPET CLEANING 219957 612` 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 748.13 326566 9/1012009 110977 - SOW, ADAMA 196.80 ART WORK SOLD 219773 090109 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 196.80 326567 9/10/2009 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 32.17 PROPANE 00005151 220070 082409 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 32.17 326568. 9110/2009 101004 SPS COMPANIES j 31.50 REPAIR KIT 00005137 219727 S2087123.001 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS'` . CITY HALL GENERAL 75.35 PIPE, COUPLINGS 00005109 219843 S2083699.001 1375.6408 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 106.85 _. 326569 9110/2009. 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 3,776.00 FALL; INTO THE ARTS ADS 220071 063109 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CONTINGENCIES 3,776.00 326570 9/10/2009 ' 101015 _ STREICHERS 844.26 VEHICLE SPOTLIGHT 219958 1661732 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL, 844.26 326571 9/10/2009 124631 STUART C. IRBY CO. 25.01 GLOVE TESTING 00005252 220061 S004921178.001 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL r: 25.01 R55CKREG LOG20060 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Council Check Register Page - 24 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326572 9/10/2009 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 50.58 SENSOR 00005157 219575 192785 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.58 326573 911012009 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F 300.00 HISTORICAL COLUMN 219959 310.8/27109 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 326574 9/10/2009 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 229.05 MERCHANDISE 219960 371273 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 125.64 MERCHANDISE 219961 368148 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 354.69 326575 9110/2009 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 135.31 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 135.31 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 135.31 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 135.31 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 5631.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 270.62 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 270.62 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 270.62 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 811.90 PRINT & DISTRIBUTE 00016102 219788 080916102 1600.6575 PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 260.00 SKATING LESSONS AD 00008053 219844 1202124 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,425.00 326576 911012009 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,027.00 219754 10190 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,027.00 326577 9/1012009 104932 TAYLOR MADE 153.60 MERCHANDISE 219962 12199251 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 135.00 MERCHANDISE 219963 12257761 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 288.60 326578 9/1012009 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 522.00 219728 73155 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 142.45 219729 556953 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 492.00 219964 73271 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 63.65 220016 557689 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,903.98 220017 557690 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,124.08 R55CKREG LOG20000 160.11 MERCHANDISE 219965 CITY OF EDINA 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,370.60 Council Check Register 0973363 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 9/10/2009 -9/10/2009 Check# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation ' PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 326579 9/10/2009 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 14.64 CARD READER CLEAN CARDS 220073 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 220072 2009 -27418 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 14.64 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 220072 2009 -27418 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER. 326683 9110/2009 175.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 220072 2009 -27418 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 525.00 4,483.41 INSTALL CUSTOM STAIR RAILINGS 00001566 219845 .22443 1647.6103 326580 911012009! 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 4,483.41 68.50 GIFT CARD 219647 090109 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 68.50 704.22 326581 9110/2009 1330.6215 101474 TITLEIST TRAFFIC SIGNALS 919/2009 8:31:44 Page- 25 Business Unit W I H 5 I .S'tLLINU YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 160.11 MERCHANDISE 219965 0980762 ' 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,370.60 GOLF BALLS 219966. 0973363 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,530.71 326582 9/10/2009 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 14.64 CARD READER CLEAN CARDS 220073 24485 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.64 326683 9110/2009 101374 TOWN S COUNTRY FENCE ` 4,483.41 INSTALL CUSTOM STAIR RAILINGS 00001566 219845 .22443 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS_ & HARD SURFACE 4,483.41 326584 9110/2009 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 704.22 LIGHTS 00001944 219644 0000038804 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS 704.22 326585 9/10/2009 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 77.15 BRAKE KITS 00005115 219645 JI19973 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.06 THROTTLE CABLE 00001994 219646 J120193 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 134.21 326586 911012009 101047 TWIN.CITY, GARAGE DOOR= 805.72 REPLACE SPRINGS '• 219967 319367 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 805.72 326587 9110/2009 103048 U.S. BANK 1,000.00 TRUSTEE 219846 2460211 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 1,000.00 326588 9/10/2009 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC 295.77 SIGN REPAIR 219968 44327 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 MOVIE IN THE PARK DONATION 219973 083109 CITY OF EDINA CONCESSIONS - CENTENNIAL EB /CL REVENUES 114.50 Council Check Register 326596 9/10/2009 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 295.77 326597 9/10/2009 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 326589 9110/2009 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 580.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 00006278 219730 44703 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 90.00 TURFF AND GROUNDS FIELD DAY 00001916 219969 090309 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 90.00 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 326590 911012009 219889 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 110.00 PEST APPLICATION CLASS 00002311 219970 19663770 5631.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 110.00 326591 9/1012009 124610 UNTERSEHER -0'KEEFE, CELENE 14.64 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 219577 083109 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 14.64 326592 9/10/2009 120285 VALENTINE, RICHARD W 25.00 AWARD OF MERIT 145711 091906 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25.00 326593 9110/2009 119479 VALLEY VIEW GLASS & SCREEN 441.18 DISPLAY DOORS FOR CABINET 220074 032809 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 441.18 326594 9110/2009 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 321.93 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 219971 133516 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 115.61 CAN LINERS, PLATES 219972 132141 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 511.59 LIQUOR BAGS 219972 132141 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 949.13 326595 911012009 103252 VEAP 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page - 26 Business Unit PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 114.50 MOVIE IN THE PARK DONATION 219973 083109 5601.4524 CONCESSIONS - CENTENNIAL EB /CL REVENUES 114.50 326596 9/10/2009 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 106.12 CELL PHONE 219578 2277732184 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 106.12 326597 9/10/2009 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 580.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 00006278 219730 44703 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 580.00 326598 9/10/2009 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 210.00 219889 28075 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/10/2009 - 9/1012009 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1322,6530 REPAIR PARTS 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page - 27 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 210.00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 326599 9110/2009 VERNON SELLING' 101069 VOSS LIGHTING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS`SOLD WINE 199,36 LIGHTING 00005123 219648 15136493 -00 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 199.36 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 326600. 9/10/2009 VERNON SELLING 101075 WEIGLE, SUE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 315.00 DOOR PRIZES FOR GOLF BANQUET 219847 090309 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 315.00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - - 326601 9/1012009 VERNON SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE- VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 769.20 5842.6406 219890 225070 -00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,218.15 5842.5513 219891 224996 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 144.00- 5842.5513 219892 224972 -00 150.67- 219893. 224690 -00 703.55 220018 224997 -00 2,396.23 -326602 9/10/2009 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,945.03 219622 286324 1.12 219623 286321 1,074.08 219755 286325 _- 645.60 219756 286322 105.12 219894 287161 3,526.59 219895 287164 2,646.00 220019 286564 1,603.06 220020 287163 1.12 220021 287208 2,530.00 220022 286565 525.60 220023 287201 81.12- 220024 44424 14,522.20 326603 9/1012009 117482 WINECONNECTINC. 158.91 ON LINE ORDERING SITE 219974 265 158.91 ON LINE ORDERING SITE 219975 309 317.82 326605 9/10/2009 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 266.14 219624 278227 640.95 219625 278231 775.35 219626 279772 1322,6530 REPAIR PARTS 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page - 27 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING' 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS`SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ' 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE: VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE- VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page - 28 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,563.15 219757 281874 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 39.05 219758 281873 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,256.03 219759 281871 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 41.05 219760 281872 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,053.95 219761 280752 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 617.70 219762 281877 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 32.52 219763 281879 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,467.40 219896 281876 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120.63 219897 280975 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 549.35 219898 281878 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,092.83 219899 278229 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,141.28 219900 278228 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,246.32 219901 280980 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,576.25 219902 280977 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 120.63 219903 280976 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 660.22 219904 281880 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 6,059.65 219905 278220 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 45.80 219906 281875 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 119.70- 219907 784020 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 175.80 220025 281885, 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 280.72 220026 278226 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 150.19 220027 281884 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8,120.87 220028 281883 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,614.75 220029 280979 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.05 220030 281881 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 420.85 220031 281882 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.98 - 220032 784383 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 165.44- 220033 784746 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 47,792.36 326607 9/1012009 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,004.95 219227 504779 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,226.50 219228 505667 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 219229 505669 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20.00 219230 505668 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,698.15- INV PD TWICE 219512 488207C 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 60.00- INV PD TWICE 219513 490831C 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,867.80- INV PD TWICE 219514 490830C 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,914.25- INV PD TWICE 219515 488476C 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,986.10 219537 505042 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 60.00 219538 505043 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/10/2009 - 9/1012009 919/2009 8:31:44 Page- 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 114.40 219539 507655 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 160.00 219540 507654 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,351.65 219627 508604 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,386.40 219628 507632 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 281.00 219731 506735 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,644.05 219764 507397 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20.00 219765 507398 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 100.00 219976 509713 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,103.45 220034 510653 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,458.50 220035 507653 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,688.05 220036 507977 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,197.09 220037 510400 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21,326.44 326608 9/1012009 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 710.49 219908 234465 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 710.49 326610 9/10/2009 101726 XCEL ENERGY 5,155.33 51- 4966303 -6 219579 208356435 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 236.95 51- 5634814 -2 219580 208366137 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 160.70 51- 4156445 -0 219581 208337319 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 93.74 51- 50054543 219582 208005750 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 418.42 51- 5938955 -6 219583 208370544 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 115.17 51- 6050184 -2 219584 208030257 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 159.77 51- 6229265 -9 219585 208377454 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,986.63 51- 6229265 -9 219585 208377454 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 744.04 51- 6046826 -0 219586 208372384 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 31,922.94 51- 4621797 -2 219587 208174250 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,265.19 51- 6223269 -1 219588 208034067 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5,516.99 51- 4827232 -6 219589 208178949 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 3,077.88 51- 9011854 -4 219590 208090368 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,496.66 51- 5547446 -1 219591 208019145 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 77.18 51- 8526048 -8 219592 208076104 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,660.09 51- 5107681 -4 219593 208008057 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 61.29 51- 6692497 -0 219594 208043711 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 36.77 51- 8102668 -0 219595 208237324 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 36.34 51- 8997917 -7 219596 208086408 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 356.30 51- 8324712 -5 219597 208074455 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 37.00 51- 6892224 -5 219598 208049952 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 25.98 51- 6541084 -2 219599 208042290 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 505.29 51- 9189085 -8 219600 208264999 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 87,285.91 CITY OF EDINA 326611 9/1012009 Council Check Register 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 9/10/2009 — 9/10/2009 156.39 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 156.07 51- 8987646 -8 219601 208256553 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,976.79 51- 4159265 -8 219977 208000770 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,151.97 51- 5847121 -5 220075 208865544 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER 23,551.58 514888627 -1 220076 208838137 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 3,302.85 51- 6840050 -6 220077 209204323 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5842.5513 5621.6610 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page - 30 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PSTF OCCUPANCY TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS WELL PUMPS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,085,058.58 Total Payments 1,085,058.58 EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87,285.91 326611 9/1012009 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 156.39 AUG USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 219602 042655109 32.49 AUG USAGE - BLDG/ENG 00004322 219603 042655108 111.63 JULY USAGE 219789 042037004 300.51 326612 9/1012009 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 1,081.50 220038 7056 1,081.50 326613 9/1012009 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 449.21 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 220078 54165328 449.21 326614 9110/2009 101091 ZIEGLER INC 232.67 HOSES, COUPLINGS 00001993 219848 PC0011601 232.67 1,085,058.58 Grand Total 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5842.5513 5621.6610 9/9/2009 8:31:44 Page - 30 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PSTF OCCUPANCY TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS WELL PUMPS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,085,058.58 Total Payments 1,085,058.58 EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RSSCKSUtv _.620000 CITY .NA 9/91:' 8:33:00 Council Check Summary Page - 1 9/10/2009 - 9/10/2009 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 226,112.15 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 300.00 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,463.75 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 1,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 99,181.93 05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,622.46 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,265.19 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,299.62 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 20,482.89 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 24,523.63 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 13,283.18 05800 LIQUOR FUND 281,386.60 ,. 05900 UTILITY FUND 391,252.65 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 7,015.91 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,868.62 Report Totals 1,085,058.58 Card .Holder Name Trans Date CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 7/28/09 - 8/25/09 Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City ✓lerchani Account State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/07/28 $626.00 LIFEGUARD LICENSES JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, KINGWOOD TX 5310.6103 JOHN:KEPRIOS 2009/07/28 $397.75 SAFETY CAMP DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1600.4390.06 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009 /07/30 $40.00 SOCKS. TGT *TARGET.COM TARGETCOM MN 5620.5510 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/08/08 $179.70 SOCKS TGT *TARGET.COM TARGET.COM MN 5620.5510 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/08/13 $440.75 PARKPROGRAM MINNESOTA TWINS ;800- 338 -9467, MN 1600.4390:31 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/08/14 $27.62 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES RENTAL 800- 228=1071 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/08/14 $78:83 TENNIS PROGRAM PAPA JOHNS #0996 612- 924 -1902 =MN 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/08/16 $24.07 ATHLETIC PROGRAM DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 4077.6406 DEB MANGEN 2009/07/31 $155.04 CLERKS CONFERENCE COMFORT SUITES BAXTER - BAXTER MN . 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2009/08/19 $7.00 PARKING U OF M PARKING AND TRAM MINNEAPOLIS MN 1180.6106 MIKE SIITARI 2009/07/29 $48.00 TELESCOPING CHALK HOLDER THE PARKING ZONE 800- 292 -7275 WA 1400 :6406 MIKE SIITARI 2009/07/30 $207.57 AIR PURIFIER FILTER AMZ *AMAZON PAYMENTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA" - 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2009/07/30 $47.49 FAXMODEM AMZ *AMAZON PAYMENTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6160 MIKE 'SIITARI 2009/08/04 $375.00 TASER RECERTIFICATION NWTC WEB REGISTRATION_ 920 -498 -6816 WI 1400.6104 MIKE SIITARI 2009/08/06 $37.63 POSTERS /NOTEPADS VISTAPR *VISTAPRINT.COM 866- 893 -6743 MA. 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2009/08/10 $541.63 TONER FOR PRINTERS HP HOME STORE 888- 999 -4747 CO 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2009/08/12 $59.98 GUN REPAIR PARTS BROWNELLS INC 641- 6235401 IA 1400.6551 MIKE SIITARI 2009/08/13 $486.00 LIFEPAC BATTERIES AED SUPERSTORE WWW.AEDS.CC WI 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2009/08/13 $69.80 CRIME SCENE SUPPLIES JYI *JOBIN YVON INC 732 - 494 -8660 NJ 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2009/08/14 $144.90 VIDEO CABLES DATAPRO INC 206 - 7825259 WA 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2009/08/19 $169.81 MEMORY CARDS CDW GOVERNMENT 800- 800 -4239 IL 1400.6160 JOHN WALLIN 2009/07/31 $329.20 COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING AIRLINES AR 3377694954'552 ATLANTA GA 2210:6104 JOHNVALLIN 2009/08/03 $120.44 COUNCIL WORKSHOP KOWALSKI'S MARKET MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2009/08/09 $78.11 CUTTER ASSEMBLY KIT HP SERVICES 800- 325 -5372 CA 1260.6710 JOHN WALLIN 2009/08/12 $340.90 HEALTH_ CONFERENCE CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOL BRAINERD MN 1490.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2009/08/18 $146.68 COUNCIL WORKSHOP KOWALSKI'S MARKET `MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2009/08/19 $102.92 ASSESSING CONFERENCE JACKPOT JUNCTION LODGE MORTON MN 1190.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2009/08/19 $102.92 ASSESSING CONFERENCE JACKPOT JUNCTION LODGE MORTON MN 1190.6104 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 7/28/09 - 8/25/09 Card Holder Jlerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN WALLIN 2009/08/20 $428.20 MICROSOFT TRAINING NWA AIR 0127452265717 MAPLE GROVE MN 1554.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2009/08/20 $30.00 MICROSOFT TRAINING AGENT FEE 0127452265711 TRAVEL LEADE MN 1554.6104 $5,843.94. Page 2 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies ,and Procedures date — ca S' o e Cn • 1888 Tv // To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 15, 2009 Subject: Receive petition REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VII. A. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Info /Background: The City received a petition signed by three residents, requesting an extension of the sidewalk along the south side of Interlachen Boulevard between Bedford Avenue and Williams Avenue. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. AI DATE RECEIVED: �. City of Edina, Minnesota o` e ' CITY COUNCIL th �y �_ Cn H� )° 4801 West 50 Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 d (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD Rup t%��VED PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL C1� �RNGD�• ENGINES SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. of -:T--/VTZLRC06Nt V C between ed\ tl and W -t�L, i ,&,& A LA`� LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) COW • — r etitiol S circulated by: �Vw NAME ADDRESS PHONE K vn krt�s 50-a9 Sed;c,,.t5# AYt�ck. There is space for more signatures on APRIL 2008 j f 5236 Q FnFR"CHENBlVD - 5313 5305 5000 5237 5005 5013 5012 5013 6 5017 5016 5017 5021 5020 5021 5025 S024 5025 5028 5029 5029 Ma¢mLld.reA rfl15• C r,4-.T ?C1 LOGS+Q'32MS 5032 p 5033 j f o� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. B. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: September 15, 2009 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Received Since Last Council Meeting Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. SEP 112009 September 8, 2oo9 Edina City Council 48oi W. 5oth St. Edina MN 55424 edinamailPei.edina.mn.us RE: Regional Bike Paths - Please link in Edina Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: We wish Edina had a bike path link to the Twin Cities Regional Trails bike path system. Attached please find the Twin Cities Regional Trails map, which shows the void in Edina. Your help to accomplish a bike path link would be much appreciated by numerous bicyclists in Edina. Many thanks for your consideration! Best Reg/ar_ds, V �'J- john F. Healey 48o8 Upper Terrace Edina MN 55435 952-929 -8800 i rlcxar^S'�t -- !:A.u�� r Ixuorf:li — - -- r 1 rir7FfI 1--^ f -01 tf,l fQ0, rO, Ilir T /s► l - ;I C)fSC.,nfralAno4r(, &nkerHitls I y L17J Twin Citios) ft E � 4 a Regional Trtar 9 nElm Crerk f�goof to � ��76c1G m Park 169 o MAIN! ChaindLakn if E Aeserve c Reg Part P HUGO LM CHAd�P1.IN jC7 �i,.A R;re rn: ( 2 y ab'l J 'Cc„yd n Rappidf Dem r ctfl + "'I� - b m 4{c nnepin Re .Perko '5-in o' Lakes Tr tJ � nvn '- I, r 52 NoM1h 4Tr"'h a A _r„ t0 rrr.. -- 1- _ Pint Point r A({PI I. r>CSF(y Co Park ;: -rnn. tir)t Ire � 8dd Ea,�M ci ;RC)It yyy� s'11, � 114h. Omer LlF 10111 WOOD )KLiT !' 5!tlU': DS t1 - - R Pk ui �3,: (k/I'" Ptrh• i R�rr (f, 1 rll1'li , rfi: ARD Hwy 46 7r m ! IK1fIt.l.'1 HILIS s'� �• "� - 5;4DN15 - •3 n 77F�� ,. riROJ N'HI'I. r% 13 1MGrrt� UR {n r I _ - R IFti f!Air+r NlW r a, bt Ali ® p -H1 i1N!!:r rUN i 10 CAKE .ifAMO. - 169 CRt- S7: {!. I ti4 tfU�' Baker dr1il>INA I .¢ -•4� i..,:�,_:,.� -tea. -^ -. _: -�. �: Park NCf7, ..Reserve fy- 1',uO[ lli 1!0111 ).!11 11gl G'IECEE tD} P{NL 7f!ir:rl7� . ra t or LAKE RttpOR7 /flEt' IW14 gate ti ' LuC,Lin r ( WIN ti 7L1/7.1MULN Lik•Elfn oi 611. Luce Unc �} i -' bt !Regional Pprk ti17t UN 12 © d� R0i t° ` t,4idto v 'i<irenmva .ALL. r Kl I ✓ls pl rl'- ° .ST LO IS 1 ^ ` I I ..AND s i1OTh N° t' PARK Summit Ave 'SaW&Cr 0.9 lRT Tr L 71D1 d. 1 !1 '1`'r.11 •Ul i3 61 Reg pi! Dakota ePto ty.I , �10 -a a\ •'Y F- ..t._� _ KAI 1 �C 1 S1OR c C nd +� >°• S1� 769 llif?�',t a ?� I PAUT. I '.tPr)f)tir'Rt .1flOA' Mpls ,r, - - - i r St Paul 1 52 �SL\`- Lk MinneWashfa � t n rr , P.Wf Afton 1nt'1 i A 4 Reg Park S 72 t,f+ r_r Airport S k.? H! 11'1'1 rR7 i+s LIiAi IW%I:N -.r.Q c-nT' t- r� .. park 'MM Laridscapf Arboretum tb9 l� t3' 9e - 1 rR d'tt 1- " H)EN PR UIM �H dilfl.(r16 \Ilh' (r,�' _ i �. -`�, 7O:n/t' Grr rl'r CH, {SKA , 12 U Pk' ' • r,t.,iN !liH;ii7.1 IU — I Cottage Grave St Croix �n Rav!ne Red Pk r~ esora V le Sr. r ' Fi C5 23 Re 169 L Leb H :b p y 5 10 miles ® Rev F, ) At 'U7rll' 111'I_f l' {1I r1 11MIAH" VJ.r - -� To: The Edina City Council SEP 1 1 1009 From: Mark J. Marshall Re: Creek Valley Road Saftey Issues I live at 6213 Creek Valley Road, which is at the intersection of Creek Valley and Nordic near the elementary school and ultimately adjacent to the soccer fields. The neighborhood is isolated due to no through streets and as a result most traffic is forced on to Creek Valley. Conversations with the Edina Police and the Traffic planning have basically told us they do not see a problem, the volume is not all that high etc. While I recognize that we live by a school and soccer fields we also have a reasonable expectation to see that people drive responsibly on our street. To my knowledge a study of the volume has not been done in recent years and there has been no observing of the driving habits that occur. The police claim they have observed the area, however, know one in the nighborhood recalls seeing them observing this. We recognize it is frenetic and sporadic due to how the soccer fields are used. There are several days that there are nearly 100 cars (yes, I counted) parked at the park and many that involve dropping off at the 6 fields there and pick up. We are not anti- soccer and are not suggesting they stop using the fields, but we do think the traffic could be managed better. A former neighbor's daughter was told by her coach she could not walk home because the street was so unsafe. We have witnessed many near misses and constantly experience the dangers of trying to pull out of our driveway. This is in addition to seeing parents driving their SUVs off the road on to the grass to drive on to the playground. Unless something is done you will eventually have a child killed by a car or a serious accident. I have seen cars swerve to miss kids and kids have to jump out of the way to avoid being hit. I am confident there is not another playground area in the city that has this reckless behavior occurring along its periphery. To date the only action the city has taken in this issue is to propose a dog park in the area (driving more traffic that way), remove a "Children at Play" sign a neighbor had put up (the city's response was if we have one everyone will want one), and worry about speeders on 62..Its frustrating to see 4 -5 police cars worried about people zipping along on the high way and not worry about them zipping through our neighborhoods. We would like some proactive effort made. Police presence? Speed bump? Please advise how we can have this issue addressed. I have avoided the petition from all the neighbors approach but am comfortable saying that the majority of the neighborhood views this as an issue. Thank you. Mark J. Marshall 612 - 220 -6756 ,N�s voo �r T4 0rd j,. C/0. Creek Valley Rd Balder Ln .a%. 6500 Creek Drive Edina, MN 55439 September 9, 2009 RECEIVED John Keprios SEP 11 2009 Edina Park and Recreation Director Edina City Hall 4801 W. -50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear John, Although I received a.polite "courtesy call" from Vince Co6criel —Park Superintendent, I am disappointed that you and your department have failed to follow up on..my use and safety concerns of the walkway running through my property as expressed in my May 3, 2009. In addition to people believing this walkway is part of the Three Rivers Park District's regional trail proposal, there have been three occasions between August 26, 2009 and September 8, 2009 where people have used engine powered scooters on the walkway. I request the City of Edina follow up on my concerns, even if it requires reinstalling the walkway barriers. I have attached a copy of my May 3, 2009 letter and am forwarding this to the mayor and city council. Be a ds, Thomas G. (Greg) Clifford Enclosures: May 3, 2009 letter May 4, 2009 USPS receipt Cc: Honorable James Hovland, Mayor Joni Bennett, Councilwoman Mary Brindle, Councilwoman Scot Housh, Councilman Ann Swenson, Councilwoman 6500 Creek Drive Edina, MN 55439 May 3, 2009 John Keprios Edina Park and Recreation Director Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50" St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear John, Recent developments including traffic by my house and comments from people walking through my neighborhood leave me concerned. It appears people believe the Creek Drive to Height Park path is public property rather than a walkway easement. I believe the confusion is related to the Three Rivers Park District regional trail proposal and the new "Entrance to Heights Park" sign at the Creek Drive side of the walkway. During the 2008 reconstruction project it was a.pleasure working with you and your staff, as the walkway was in need of significant repairs. The surface had become quite rough (including protruding roots), the fence was in disrepair, and the barrier posts at the Creek Drive side of the walkway had broken off. The curb ramp at Creek Drive is a great addition which now allows the neighborhood youth to access the walkway directly, rather than negotiating traffic at the Valley Lane / Creek Drive intersection. It was just a matter of time before a youngster was injured at this intersection where motorists continually disobey the three way stop. To eliminate any confusion and encourage respectful use of the walkway, I request the Park and Recreation Department change the sign to read "Walkway to Heights Park ", replace the sign prohibiting motorized vehicles (which was removed during the 2008 reconstruction), and work with the Edina Police Department to enforce walkway speed/ safety and traffic signs at the Creek Drive / Valley Lane intersection. At this time I'm not asking for replacement of the Creek Drive access barrier posts, as I hope other methods can be used to ensure safe, respectful, and responsible use of the walkway. B gards, Thomas G. (Greg) Clifford rq 's SU.42 RiJ19 O Poste9e ru Certified Fee t. ?(i 03,\-Ur, t3 O O Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) •'1U \ H� \ M O N Restricted Delivary Fee ` (Endorsement Required) 00 [C �+ t I J cE3 p0 Total Postage a Fees' $ $3.12 n J cr - - — C3 SVEeC APL Flo.: orPO Box No. \ - -----� � h ----_ �1. SO 8!L"-, 1"w ... - � TM --� S-5-4v, � =---------- -- 5700 Tucker Lane RECEIVED Edina, Minnesota 55436 952- 930 -9040 SEP 112009 September 4, 2009 Larry Blackstad, Chair Board of Commissioners Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Dear Mr. Blackstad: I have had the occasion to review the agreement the District has with Bonestroo and it is apparent that the Consultant will deliver only an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) which will contain recommendations for the mitigation of environmental problems of one or more of the proposed trails. That approach is troublesome since without an Environmental Impact Study (EIS), there is no way to assess the environmental feasibility of any trails through the watershed, a bottom line requirement for environmental assessment. The lack of environmental vigor is apparent from pages 5 and 6 of the Project Approach which provides that the cumulative environment impact will not involve "boots on the ground." Sincerely, Richard C. Johnson RCJ /tlt cc: The Honorable James Hovland The Honorable Scot Housh The Honorable Joni Bennett The Honorable Mary Brindle The Honorable Ann Swenson RECEIVED SEP .1 � ll P7- 3 /7 September 2, 2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city.needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. In particular we want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section # 2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: Habitat, environment — Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habit and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. My concern is that this trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a big loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for our both enjoyment and as a home for these animals. Flooding —The creek regularly overflows into yards in the spring. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. This is further compounded by the proposed re- routing of the creek within Section #2. It is widely rumored that the re- meandering of the creek near Methodist Hospital was not successful. My concern is that the combined effect of building a trail and modifying the flow of the creek will increase the risk of flood damage to my property. To date there has been no evidence that the city has sufficient hydrogeology and civil engineering studies to demonstrate the proposed actions will decrease the risk of flood damage to adjacent properties and will not adversely impact plant /animal life in the area. Safety — With the annual number of bike trail users estimated to be 500,000 persons, we believe that the safety and security of our neighborhood would be threatened. • Our neighbor is home to a diverse group of people which includes vulnerable children and adults. We are very concerned about potential dangers created by granting up to 500,000 people access to our property (with little or no visibility from the street). With the addition of this trail, many residents will face vehicle traffic in front of their house and bike /pedestrian Page 1 Mile Creek Bike Trail traffic in the backyard. This proposal would allow many strangers access to our property and create unnecessary risks to our citizen's safety and well being. • We are concerned about policing of the area. We were informed that policing would be carried out by the 3 Rivers Park and not by the City of Edina. Who would we turn to if we needed help? Who will watch out for those vulnerable children and adults? The proposal would seem to create a needless chain of command to address potential problems in the neighborhood. The number of officers assigned to patrol bike trails is quite limited in other areas. • It is unclear to us who would be charged with cleaning and maintaining the trails. We should not be expected to routinely pick up litter in our yards. As tax payers we are not thrilled with the idea of paying for the on -going maintenance resulting from building a trail in a wetlands and flood plain. • We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. The grasses get very dry in the summer and careless use of smoking materials (or some other source such as vandalism) could quickly endanger homes in our neighborhood. Budget and priorities —This isn't the time for a big- ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and /or road and bridge improvements. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. The safety and security of our homes and families would be at risk. Sincerely, Page 2 September 6, 2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50* Street Edina, MN 55424 RECEIVED SEP 1� Dear Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city. needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. We particularly want to voice our displeasurd over the potential of Section #2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: HABITAT, ENVIRONMENT - Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many.species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habitat and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. This trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a huge loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for both our enjoyment and as a home for these animals. FLOODING- A large, long bridge structure located in the flood plain of 9 Mile Creek will increase the risk of flooding to residents of property located in the flood plain'. AESTHETICS- A bridge '' /< mile long, 12 feet high and 16' wide will be much less aesthetic than a wetland in its natural condition. VALUES - "Recreational playing" on a bike path has less value to society than maintaining a rare natural wetland in a metro environment. PUBLIC SPENDING- We should not be spending public funds to provide more places to "play" in this economic climate when we have so much public debt This isn't the time for a big - ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and/or road and bridge improvements. DIVERSION OF RESOURCES- We should not divert resources from bicycle transportation which is a "need" as outlined in the September 19, 2007 City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, to bicycle recreation which is a `want'. FUTURE LIABILITY -We should not create a future unfunded public liability for bicycle trail maintenance and repair when we currently have very large unfunded public liabilities. NEED- We do not `.`need" an additional recreational bike trail. We already have more miles of bike trails than any other state in the union and more than 150 miles of bike/hike rails administered by Three Rivers Park District VULNERABILITY — An unlighted, unsecured, public path located on public property with little or no visibility from the street, suitable for concealment, open both night and day, that allows access to an estimated 550,000 people annually, which passes within 100 feet of the backside of residences, some occupied by single females, elderly couples and children, will increase the vulnerability of these residents to predators. SECTION 830.01 CITY CODE- PURPOSE - The council finds and declares that the lands and vegetation of the City are a valuable resource requiring protection from the effects of urbanization. The purpose of this Section is to regulate land disturbing activities to prevent undue loss of the urban forest, reduce erosion and sedimentation and enhance the natural beauty of the City in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the residents. We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. An example of this is the fire that damaged the bike trail structure on the Luce Line Trail. This proposal is an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer dollars, jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas, negatively affects the people and wildlife along its path and threatens the safety and security of our homes and families. Sincer 3 (V September 2, 2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424, Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents: However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. In particular we want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section # 2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: Habitat, environment — Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habit and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. My concern is that this trail will drive the wild life away from the.area. This is a big loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for our both enjoyment and as a home for these animals. Flooding —The creek regularly overflows into yards in the spring. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. This is further compounded by the proposed re- routing of the creek within Section #2. It is widely rumored that the re- meandering of the creek near Methodist Hospital was not successful. My concern is that the combined effect of building a trail and modifying the flow of the creek will increase the.risk of flood.riamaga t� my nronQrty. To date there has been no evidence that the city has sufficient hydrogeology and civil engineering studies to demonstrate the proposed actions will decrease the risk of flood damage to adjacent . properties and will not adversely impact plant /animal life in the area. Safety — With the annual number of bike trail users estimated to be 500,000 persons, we believe that the safety and security of our neighborhood would be threatened. o Our neighbor is home to a diverse group of people which includes vulnerable children and adults. We are very concerned about potential dangers created by granting up to 500,000 people access to our property (with little or no visibility from the street). With the addition of this trail, many residents will face vehicle traffic in front of their house and bike /pedestrian Page 1 Proposed 9 Mile Creek Bike Trail traffic in the backyard. This proposal would allow many strangers access to our property and create unnecessary risks to our citizen's safety and well being. • We are concerned about policing of the area. We were informed that policing would be carried out by the 3 Rivers Park and not by the City of Edina. Who would we turn to if we needed help? Who will watch out for those vulnerable children and adults? The proposal would seem to create a needless chain of command to address potential problems in the neighborhood. The number of officers assigned to patrol bike trails is quite limited in other areas. • It is unclear to us who would be charged with cleaning and maintaining the trails. We should not be expected to routinely pick up litter in our yards. As tax payers we are not thrilled with the idea of paying for the on -going maintenance resulting from building a trail in a wetlands and flood plain. • We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. The grasses get very dry in the summer and careless use of smoking materials (or some other source such as vandalism) could quickly endanger homes in our neighborhood. Budget and priorities —This isn't the time for a big- ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and /or road and bridge improvements. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. The safety and security of our homes and families would be at risk. Page 2 RECEIVED c� SEP 12009 September 6, 2009 _ Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50's Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina . is a wonderful community and we are'happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. We particularly want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section #2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: HABITAT, ENVIRONMENT- Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habitat and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. This trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a huge loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for.both our enjoyment and as a home for these animals. FLOODING- A large, long bridge structure located in the flood plain of 9 Mile Creek will increase the risk of flooding to residents of property located in the flood plain. AESTHETICS- A bridge ' /< mile long, 12 feet high and 16' wide will be much less aesthetic than a wetland in its natural condition. VALUES - "Recreational playing" on a bike path has less value to society than maintaining a rare natural wetland in a metro environment. PUBLIC SPENDING- We should not be spending public funds to provide more places to "play" in this economic climate when we have so much public debt. This isn't the time for a big -ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about S4.6 billion. We should be able to find.a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and/or road and bridge improvements. DIVERSION OF RESOURCES- We should not divert resources from bicycle transportation which is a "need" as outlined in the September 19, 2007 City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, to bicycle recreation which is a "want'. FUTURE LIABILITY -We should not create a future unfunded public liability for bicycle trail maintenance and repair when we currently have very , large unfunded public liabilities. NEED- We do.not "need" an additional recreational bike trail. We already have more miles of bike trails than any other state in the union and more than 150 miles of bike/hike rails administered by Three Rivers Park District. VULNERABILITY — An unlighted, unsecured, public path located on public property with little or no visibility from the street; suitable for concealment, open both night and day, that allows access to an estimated 550,000 people annually, which passes within 100 feet of the backside of residences, some occupied by single females, elderly couples and children, will increase the vulnerability of these residents to predators. SECTION 830.01 CITY CODE- PURPOSE - The council finds and declares that the lands and vegetation of the City are a valuable resource requiring protection from the effects of urbanization. The purpose of this Section is to regulate land disturbing activities to prevent undue loss of the urban forest, reduce erosion and sedimentation and enhance the natural beauty of the City in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the residents. We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. An example of this is the fire that damaged the bike hail structure on the Luce Line Trail. This proposal is an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer dollars, jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas, negatively affects the people and wildlife along its path and threatens the safety and security of our homes and families. &WmA JA VAMM ✓ 'r , 47AI September 2, 2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: RECEIVED SEP 112009 Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. In particular we want to voice our displeasure over.the potential of Section # 2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: Habitat, environment — Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habit and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. My concern is that this trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a big loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for our both enjoyment and as a home for these animals. Flooding —The creek regularly overflows into yards in the spring. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. This is further compounded by the proposed re- routing of the creek within Section #2. It is widely rumored that the re- meandering of the.creek near Methodist Hospital was not successful. My concern is that the combined effect of building a trail and modifying the flow of the creek will increase the risk of flood damage to my property. To date there has'been no evidence that the city has sufficient hydrogeology and civil engineering studies to demonstrate the proposed actions will decrease the risk-of flood damage to adjacent properties and will not adversely impact plant /animal life in the.area. Safety— With the annual number of bike trail users estimated to be 500,000 persons, we believe that the safety and security of our neighborhood would be threatened. o Our neighbor is home to,a diverse group of people which includes vulnerable children and adults. We are very concerned about potential dangers created by granting up to 500,000 people access to our-property (with little or no visibility from the street): With the addition of this trail, many residents will face vehicle traffic in front of their house and bike /pedestrian Page 1 Proposed 9 Mile Creek Bike Trail traffic.-ii the - backyard. This proposal would allow many strangers access to our property and create unnecessary risks to our citizen's safety and well being. • We are, concerned about policing of the area. We were informed that policing would be carried out by the 3 Rivers Park and not by the City of Edina. Who would we turn to if we needed help? Who will watch out for those vulnerable children and adults? The proposal would seem to create a needless chain of command to address potential problems in the neighborhood. The number,of officers assigned to patrol bike trails is quite limited in other areas. • It is unclear to us who would be charged with cleaning and maintaining the trails. We should not be expected to routinely pick up litter in our yards. As tax payers we are not thrilled with the idea of paying for the on -going maintenance resulting from building a trail in a wetlands and flood plain. • We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. The grasses get very dry in the summer and careless use of smoking materials (or some other source such as vandalism) could quickly endanger homes in our neighborhood. Budget and priorities.— This isn't the time for a big- ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and /or road and bridge improvements. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. The safety and security of our homes and families would be at risk. Sincer�I , Page 2 i 1-J 5 3� September 2, 2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: RECEIVED SEP 112009 Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. , However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project.that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. In particular we want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section # 2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: Habitat, environment — Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habit and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. My concern is that this trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a big loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for our both enjoyment and as a home for these animals. Flooding —The creek regularly overflows into yards in the spring. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. This is further compounded by the proposed re- routing of the creek within Section #2. It is widely rumored that the re- meandering of the creek near Methodist Hospital was not successful. My concern is that the combined effect of building a trail and modifying the flow of the creek will increase the risk of flood damage to my property. To date there has been no evidence that the city has sufficient hydrogeology and civil engineering studies to demonstrate the proposed actions will decrease the risk of flood damage to adjacent properties.and will not adversely impact plant /animal life in the area. Safety — With the annual number of bike trail users estimated to be 500,000 persons, we believe that the safety and security of our neighborhood would be threatened. o Our neighbor is home to a diverse group of people which includes vulnerable children and adults. We are very concerned about potential dangers created by granting up to 500,000 people access to our property (with little or no.visibility from the street). With the addition of this trail, many residents will face vehicle traffic in front of their house and bike /pedestrian Page 1 1 Proposed 9 Mile Creek Bike Trail traffic in the backyard. This proposal would allow many strangers access to our property and create unnecessary risks to our citizen's safety and well being. • We are concerned about policing of the area. We were informed that policing would be carried out by the 3 Rivers Park and not by the City of Edina. Who would we turn to if we needed help? Who will watch out for those vulnerable children and adults? The proposal would seem to create a needless chain of command to address potential problems in the neighborhood. The number of officers assigned to patrol bike trails is quite limited in other areas. • It is unclear to us who would be charged with cleaning and maintaining the trails. We should not be expected to routinely pick up litter in our yards. As tax payers we are not thrilled with the idea of paying for the on -going maintenance resulting from building a trail in a wetlands and flood plain. • We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. The grasses get very dry in the summer and careless use of smoking materials (or some other source such as vandalism) could quickly endanger homes in our neighborhood. Budget and priorities — This isn't the time for a big- ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and /or road and bridge improvements. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. The safety and security of our homes and families would be at risk. Sincerelv. Page 2 o of VU a.qWiWia To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 15, 2009 Subject: Correspondence REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VII. B. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Info /Background: Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. RECEIVED SEP 14 2009 Subject: To Mayor Hovland and Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, and Swenson We are contacting you concerning this matter because the Department of Engineering and Public Works has been unresponsive despite several phone calls and submissions to its "Report a Problem" site, beginning last Spring. The pavement in the street outside 5617 Oaklawn Avenue, and continuing west on Kellogg Place, has crumbled down to the dirt for long stretches, leaving dangerous and unsightly sunken spots nearly to the middle of the street. We are enclosing three photos of this area, so you can see for yourself that we are not exaggerating. What is particularly galling is that the City performed patching further to the west on Kellogg Place this summer, which you can see in Photo No. 2. It simply is beyond us why a work crew would take care of part of the problem, but not all of it. We understand that these streets are scheduled to be replaced in 2011 (delayed from the original schedule of 2010), but this situation will not wait. We are 23- year residents of Edina (all at this address) and have never rattled the Council's cage before, but we do not know where else to turn. We would appreciate the courtesy of a response to this communication. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Jim Alt and Deborah McKnight 5617 Oaklawn Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55424 Phone (Jim daytime): (612) 340 -2803 altjim @hotmail.com dmcknight7 @hotmail.com AA. 4kk tv op 4t �. , � -t ' A' •.. 4 it . . - Ar � •.' 7 ti . , ow r ! l ', %� +♦ . - - r • } . .. 4t,, ` �• , : ` � ,�• F /rte' - � ` �-• �... _ -. ' •L r� r.. L t`� ^ t_ .t:•. - ,: • -. _ r RECEIVED 4801 West 70'' Street $EP 15 2009 Edina, MN 55435' September 13, 2009 Ms. Joni Bennett Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Joni, Please find attached a copy of the letter that' I sent to John _Kepri os .regarding A meson Acres Park. The City is undercharging for the use of its facilities, and I have observed open alcohol consumption at events in the gardens. In addition, there are some under- supervised juveniles in the area who have been causing property damage and general mischief. I have attached a copy of the rates that the Arboretum charges for the use of the comparable gardens. I hope that you will consider bringing to the Council the issue of charging higher fees for use of the park facilities,.especially by non - residents. I am told that there is also a problem with one group commandeering the pavilion at the swimming pool every July 4th to the exclusion of Edina taxpayers. Surely there is a way to consider charges for the exclusive use of that site as well, at least by groups of more than eight to ten people. Thanks for your time and attention to this matter. Edina is so fortunate that you choose to devote your energies to making it a better place! Sincerely, ✓" /WLCC / I �i�� Anne Marie Plante / /��f� Attachments (2) o PIJ 4801 West 70`h Street Edina, MN 55435 Mr. John Keprios, Director Parks and Recreation, City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN Dear Mr. Keprios: September 13, 2009 Living adjacent to Arneson Acres Park, I have a special interest in seeing that the park is kept safe and well maintained. Three issues urgently require your attention: inadequate rental charges for the.use of this and other park facilities (especially by non - residents), violation of the rules regarding liquor consumption and smoking at rental events in the park proper, and unsupervised juveniles causing property damage, especially to the fountain. • The City is not charging enough for the use of the park. I belong to the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum (http://www.arboi-etum.umii.eduJp-ardencereniony.aspx). I have attached their price list for comparable rentals. Edina cannot possibly be recouping the cost of cleanup and maintenance incurred by most events. In addition, many residents are beginning to resent that people who do not reside in the community can commandeer this and other Edina park sites on a regular basis for their own use to the exclusion of Edina taxpayers. • I regularly hike around the area for exercise and pass through Arneson Acres on the way home. In the past month, I have observed at least three events (the most recent on Friday, September 11), at which there has been open consumption of alcohol and smoking in the park and gazebo, and in the case of one wedding a week ago, a tent was erected that did not conform to rules for such structures. This creates significant legal exposure for the city. There is no supervision of access to alcohol by minors. With the traffic on 70`h Street, and in a school zone no less, fostering driving after alcohol consumption creates additional hazards for area children. • In addition to the damage to the fountain done by unsupervised adolescents in August (which I reported to the police), the park is often a "hangout magnet." Last Sunday, for example, as I was coming home, I noticed some juveniles pitching suds around the fountain. They had put some type of detergent in the fountain as a prank. The police should make a swing through the parks a part of their daily routes, in additional to monitoring speeding all along the street, especially since the parking lots of both Arneson Acres and the swimming pool seem to be favorite break hangouts for patrols. I look forward to your response regarding these matters. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require more information. Sincerely, Anne Marie Plante Attachments: (1) `_�Qarden Ceremony "^ UNIVERSITY OF IN IN ESOTA ��. 14 aW�jy r 1 Page 1 of 2 One Stop I Directories I Search U of M .�j1I,t,, �� � � {4�'' Elb �i illli a, �' - �1ri Ixy,y1�' .��.t.. �•1 � 'y+tl '�1 Learn Library Join Give Volunteer Gift Store Weddings/Facility Rental Travel HOME: WEDDINGSIFACILITY RENTAL: MEETINGS AND EVENTS: WEDDINGS: GARDEN CEREMONY A Garden Ceremony Eight exquisite garden settings are available for wedding ceremonies from early May to mid -October. Choose from the popular Palma J. Wilson Rose Garden with hundreds of hybrid roses, clematis vines, and a gazebo, to the intimate setting of the Seisui- Tei.Japanese Garden, complete with a small—traditional-styled teahouse and waterfall. Or, say "I Do" in the Sarah Stevens MacMillan Terrace Garden beneath a beautiful iron gazebo illuminated by miniature white lights and embraced by the serene winter white landscape. All have magnificent views and breath - taking seasonal displays. Nelson Shrub Rose Garden (250 Guests) Take your ceremonial walk down a path of majestic white firs to the Nelson Shrub Rose Garden featuring hundreds of colorful, continuous -bloom rose bushes. The garden is arranged in a circular pattern around the granite tiles of an exquisite reflecting pool. Up to 200 guests may be seated in the spacious lawn area between the rose beds and pool. The garden is flanked by a native sugar maple woodland. Arrangements can be made to bring in chairs one hour prior to your wedding, and picked up one hour following the wedding. Garden is located off of Three Mile Drive. Rental includes transportation to and from site from main parking lot. Rental rates are $1000 for Friday and Saturday evenings and $900 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Clotilde Irvine Sensory Garden (200 Guests) The Sensory Garden is composed of model displays of beautiful container plantings, miniature rock garden and bird and butterfly garden engages the senses and refreshes the spirit. In the center of this garden there is a spacious lawn area where up to 200 chairs can be arranged. Arrangements can be made to bring in chairs one hour prior to your wedding, and picked up one hour following the wedding. Rental rates are $950 for Friday and Saturday evenings and $850 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Palma J. Wilson Rose Garden (150 Guests) This beautiful garden features hundreds of hybrid garden roses attractively displayed on a hillside in beds connected by stone walkways and steps. The garden, screened by wooden trellises of climbing clematis vines, features a small pool with fountains and gazebo with inside seating. The magnificence of the rose garden makes it a popular site for summer weddings. It has a capacity for 150 standing guests (or 17 guests may be seated on benches). Rental rates are $900 for Friday and Saturday evenings and $800 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Elizabeth Carr Slade Perennial Garden (150 Guests) This spacious oblong garden is modeled after traditional European formal gardens. Flowerbeds are positioned around the perimeter and set off against a background of brick retaining walls and trees. Ceremonies are conducted near the pool which graces the center of the garden and is surrounded by beds of blue and gray perennials, creating the illusion of a larger pool. Perennials bloom from late March until frost. Standing capacity for 150 guests (or 12 guest may be seated on benches). Rental rates are $900 for Friday and Saturday evenings and $800 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Sarah Stevens MacMillan Terrace Garden (150 Guests) This wonderful garden represents a model northern perennial and annual garden, featuring a refreshing color palette of pinks, whites and blues throughout the growing season. The garden is partially encircled by a 4 -foot brick wall with lanterns adorning each end. At its center is a circle of lawn -a perfect position for the bride and groom, with guests gathering around the walkways or seated on the spacious Morgan Terrace. A beautiful lighted gazebo graces the garden during the winter Request a Garden Ceremony Indoor Spaces Menu 14/09/2009 months, for a beautiful evening ceremony. The garden is conveniently located behind the Snyder Building and close to the Oswald Visitor Center. It has standing capacity for 150 guests (up to 9 may be seated on benches). Rental rates are $900 for Friday and Saturday evenings and $800 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Mary L. Griggs Annual Garden (100 Guests) , This extraordinary garden, opened in 2005, encompasses more than 75,000 plants, featuring a changing color palette and plant selection each year. Circular stone walls, walkways, and a large Victorian -style fountain grace this beautiful summer garden. Rental rates are $900 for Friday and Saturday evenings and $800 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Francis de Vos Home Demonstration Garden (50 Guests) Composed of nine smaller gardens, including an herb knot garden, rock garden, cutting garden, and garden landscaped for outdoor living. All are surrounded by ornamental fences, hedges, decks, walkways, walls, patios, terraces or trellises - offering a private setting for 50 standing guests (up to 5 guests may be seated). Rental rates are $600 for Friday and Saturday evenings and $600 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Seisul -Tel Japanese Garden (12 Guests) Seisul -Tei means Garden of Pure Water. Designed by nationally renowned landscape architect Koichi Kawana, this traditional Japanese wet garden features a waterfall and pond symbolic of a great river. The rock at the base of the waterfall represents a climbing carp, a symbol of strength; the rock isolated in the water represents a ship, a symbol of the wish for an easy journey to paradise; and the island represents a turtle, symbol of immortality. The garden contains a small outdoor teahouse built of wood, bamboo and stone. Wooden entrance gates look as ageless as the water, rocks and trees. This uniquely designed garden is ideal for a small, Intimate wedding with standing room for 12 (up to 6 guests may be seated). Rental rates are $500 for Friday and Saturdays evenings and $500 for Sunday - Thursday evenings. Gardens and indoor spaces may be reserved up to 18 months In advance. For more information or to make reservations click here or call 952-443 -1411 Page 2 of 2 Annual Garden 3675 Arboretum Drive, Chaska MN 5531 B 1952.443.1400 © 2009 University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum I Privacy Policy i Site Map The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Last modified on 07/31/2007 Powered by Brandspring Solutions LLC t,*+n- /Av%vav nrhnrP.t,im nmrn.edii/f3ardenceremony.asim 14/09/2009 ` Y2 11 55 310 September 2, 2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 a.l i Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek .is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of'Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the.bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. In particular we want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section # 2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: Habitat, environment — Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habit and food supply for the . wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. My concern is that this trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This `is a big loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for our both enjoyment and as a home for these animals. Flooding —The creek regularly overflows into yards in the spring. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. This is further compounded by the proposed re- routing of the creek within Section #2. It is widely rumored that the re- meandering of the creek near Methodist Hospital was, not successful. My concern is that the combined effect of building a trail and modifying the flow of the creek will increase the risk of flood damage to my property. To date there has been no evidence that the city has sufficient hydrogeology and civil engineering studies -to demonstrate the proposed actions, will de crease the risk of flood damage to adjacent properties and will not adversely impact-plant/animal life in the area. Safety — With the annual number of bike trail users estimated to be:500,000 persons', we believe that the safety and security of our neighborhood would be threatened. o Our neighbor is home to a diverse group of people which includes vulnerable children and adults. We are very concerned about potential dangers created by granting up to 500,000 people access to our property (With - little or no visibility from.the street)..With the addition of this trail, many residents will face vehicle traffic in front of their house and bike /pedestrian Pagel Mile Creek Bike Trail traffic in the backyard. This proposal would allow many strangers access to our property and create unnecessary risks to our citizen's safety and well being. We are concerned about policing of the area. We were informed that policing would be carried out by the 3 Rivers Park and not by the City of Edina. Who would we turn to if we needed help? Who will watch out for those vulnerable children and adults? The proposal would seem to create a needless chain of command to address potential problems in the neighborhood. The number of officers assigned to patrol bike trails is quite limited in other areas. It is unclear to us who would be charged with cleaning and maintaining the trails. We should not be expected to routinely pick up litter in our yards. As tax payers we are not thrilled with the idea of paying for the on -going maintenance resulting from building a trail in a wetlands and flood plain. We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. The grasses get very dry in the summer and careless use of smoking materials (or some other source such as vandalism) could quickly endanger homes in our neighborhood. Budget and priorities — This isn't the time for a big- ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and /or road and bridge improvements. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. The safety and security of our homes and families would be at risk. sincerely, Li r� �, ID 0 Page 2 September 2,,2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina,.MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: RECEIVED SEP 15 260 Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. In particular we want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section # 2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: Habitat, environment — Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habit and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. My concern is that this trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a big loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for our both enjoyment and as a home for these animals. Flooding —The creek regularly overflows into yards in the spring. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. This is further compounded by the proposed re- routing of the creek within Section #2. It is widely rumoredthat the re- meandering of the creek near Methodist Hospital was not successful. My concern is that the combined effect of building a trail and modifying the flow of the creek will increase the-risk of flood damage to my property. To date there has been no evidence that the city has sufficient hydrogeo logy and civil engineering studies to demonstrate the proposed actions will:decrease the risk of flood damage to adjacent properties and will not adversely impact plant /animal life in the area. Safety — With the annual number of bike trail users estimated to be 500,000 persons, we believe that the safety and security of our neighborhood would be threatened. o Our neighbor is home to a diverse group of people which includes vulnerable children and adults. We are very concerned about potential dangers created by granting up to 500,000 people access to our property (with little or no visibility from the street). With the addition of this trail, many residents will face vehicle traffic in front of their house and bike /pedestrian Page 1 Proposed 9 Mile Creek Bike Trail traffic in the backyard. This proposal would allow many strangers access to our property and create unnecessary risks to our citizen's safety and well being. • We are concerned about policing of the area. We were informed that policing would be carried out by the 3 Rivers Park and not by the City of Edina. Who would we turn to if we needed help? Who will watch out for those vulnerable children and adults? The proposal would seem to create a needless chain of command to address potential problems in the neighborhood. The number of officers assigned to patrol bike trails is quite limited in other areas. • It is unclear to us who would be charged with cleaning and maintaining the trails. We should not be expected to routinely pick up litter in our yards. As tax payers we are not thrilled with the idea of paying for the on -going maintenance resulting from building a trail in a wetlands and flood plain. • We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. The grasses get very dry in the summer and careless use of smoking materials (or some other source such as vandalism) could quickly endanger homes in our neighborhood. Budget and priorities — This isn't the time for a big- ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and /or road and bridge improvements. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. The safety and security of our homes and families would be at risk. SinrPrPly. Page 2 RECEIVED SEP 151009 wil lam I Kuross 5808 View Ln Minneapolis, AIN 55436 September 6, 2009. Mayor Hovland and City Council. Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. We particularly want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section #2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons: HABITAT, ENVIRONMENT- Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habitat and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. This trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a huge loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for both our enjoyment and as a home for these animals. FLOODING- A large, long bridge structure located in the flood plain of 9 Mile Creek will increase the risk of flooding to residents of property located in the flood plain. AESTHETICS- A bridge '/4 mile long, 12 feet high and 16' wide will be much, less aesthetic than a wetland in its natural condition. VALUES - "Recreational playing" on a bike path has less value to society than maintaining a rare natural wetland in a metro environment. PUBLIC SPENDING - We should not be spending public funds to provide more places to "play" in this economic climate when we have so much public debt. This isn't the time for a big -ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local education system, supporting first responders and/or road and bridge improvements. DIVERSION OF RESOURCES- We should not divert resources from bicycle transportation which is a "need" as outlined in the September 19, 2007 City of Edina Comprehensive. Bicycle Transportation Plan, to bicycle recreation which is a "want'. FUTURE LIABILITY -We should not create a future unfunded public liability for bicycle trail maintenance and repair when we currently have very large unfunded public liabilities. NEED- We do not "need" an additional recreational bike trail. We already have more miles of bike trails than any other state in the union and more than 150 miles of bike/hike rails administered by Three Rivers Park District. VULNERABILITY — An unlighted, unsecured, public path located on public property with little or no visibility from the street, suitable for concealment, open both night and day, that allows access to an estimated 550,000 people annually, which passes within 100 feet of the backside of residences, some occupied by single females, elderly couples and children, will increase the vulnerability of these residents to predators. SECTION 830.01 CITY CODE- PURPOSE - The council finds and declares that the lands and vegetation of the City are a valuable resource requiring protection from the effects of urbanization. The purpose of this Section is to regulate land disturbing activities to prevent undue loss of the urban forest, reduce erosion and sedimentation and enhance the natural beauty of the City in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the residents. We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. An example of this is the fire that damaged the bike trail structure on the Luce Line Trail. This proposal is an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer dollars, jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas, negatively affects the people and wildlife along its path and threatens the safety and security of our homes and families. Sincerely, — �ad RECEIVED 3� ldidoid o r�y SEP 15 2009 A q3(t:;, September 6, 2009 Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50' Street Edina,.MN 55424 Dear . Edina is a wonderful community and we are happy and proud to be Edina citizens. We also understand that the city needs to undertake projects intended to improve the quality of life for its residents. However, the proposed bike trail along 9 Mile Creek is one such project that will actually serve to diminish the quality of life for the people of Edina. We are strongly opposed to building the bike trail along the 9 Mile Creek. We particularly want to voice our displeasure over the potential of Section #2 which is adjacent to our property. We oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek for the following reasons; HABITAT, ENVIRONMENT- Section #2 of the path includes woods and wetlands which are home to many species of animals. Creating a bike trail will destroy much of the natural habitat and food supply for the wildlife. Regular views of native grasses, deer, fox, . wild turkey, birds and much more will be destroyed. This trail will drive the wild life away from the area. This is a huge loss since Edina has so little undeveloped property remaining for both our enjoyment and as a home for these animals. FLOODING- A large, long bridge structure located in the flood plain of 9 Mile Creek will increase the risk of flooding to residents of property located in the flood plain. AESTHETICS- A bridge' /4 mile long, 12 feet high and 16' wide will be much less aesthetic than a wetland in its natural condition. VALUES - "Recreational playing" on a bike path has less value to society than maintaining a rare natural wetland in a metro environment PUBLIC SPENDING- We should not be spending,public funds to provide more places to "play" in this economic climate when we have so much public debt This isn't the time for a.big- ticket (unnecessary) project. The state budget deficit is about $4.6 billion. We should be able to find a better use for these monies including improvement to our local' education system, supporting first responders and/or road and bridge improvements. DIVERSION OF RESOURCES- We should not divert resources from bicycle transportation which is a "need" as outlined in the September 19, 2007 City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle. Transportation Plan, to bicycle recreation which is a "want'. FUTURE LIABILITY -We should not create a future unfunded public liability for bicycle trail maintenance and repair when we currently have very large unfunded public liabilities. NEED We do not "need" an additional recreational bike trail. We already -have more miles of bike trails than any other state in the union and more than 150 miles of bike/hike rails administered by Three Rivers Park District. VULNERABILITY — An unlighted, unsecured, public path located on public property with little or no visibility from the street, suitable for concealment, open both night and day, that allows access to an estimated 550,000 people annually, which passes within 100 feet of the backside of residences, some occupied by single females, elderly couples and children, will increase the vulnerability of these residents to predators. SECTION 830.01 CITY CODE- PURPOSE - The council finds and declares that the lands and vegetation of the City are a valuable resource requiring protection from the effects of urbanization. The purpose of this Section is to regulate land disturbing activities to prevent undue loss of the urban forest, reduce erosion and sedimentation and enhance the natural beauty of the City in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the residents. We are concerned about the risk of fire in the marsh that could quickly spread to other structures (homes) in the area. An example of this is the fire that damaged the bike trail structure on the Luce Line Trail. This proposal is an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer dollars, jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife ar4as, negatively affects the people and wildlife along its path and threatens the safety and security of our homes and families. Sincerel , City of Edina September 15, 2009 Mr. Ray LaHood Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: U.S. Highway 169 and 1 494 Interchange Project Dear Secretary LaHood, The City of Edina is writing to express our support for the TIGER Discretionary grant application for the U.S. 169/1 -494 Interchange Project in Hennepin County, Minnesota. This interchange serves as a vital link for the transfer of goods and services throughout our community and the region. The critical improvements are necessary to provide the essential regional transportation network required to grow our economy and will help to employ our state work force. This project will help eliminate the regional bottleneck and increase safety thereby improving the quality of life of all users. We strongly urge your favorable review of the Minnesota Department of Transportation TIGER grant application for the U.S. 169/1- 494 Interchange Project. dGoon ly, L Hughes Ci ty Manager c: Edina City Council Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works /City Engineer City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 MINUITES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 2009, AT 7:00 PM EDINA CITY HALL — COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Chris Rofidal, Arlene Forrest, Bob Kojetin, Jean Rehkamp Larson, Joel Stegner, Bob Schwartzbauer and Elizabeth Montgomery MEMBERS ABSENT: Lou Blemaster, and Connie Fukuda STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, HPB Consultant I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: July 14, 2009 Member Rehkamp Larson moved approval of the minutes from the July 14, 2009 HPB meeting. Member Stegner seconded the motion. Member Kojetin asked that the minutes reflect the reason he voted nay on COA H -09 -7. 4611 Arden Avenue (The full front elevation of the home showing the new front entry portico was not provided to the Board prior to the meeting.) Ms. Rehkamp Larson and Mr. Stegner agreed the motion should include Member Kojetin's request. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT A. H -09 -8 4625 Casco Avenue Construction of a new detached garage. Planner Repya explained that the subject request involves demolishing the existing 369 square foot detached garage and building a new, 404 square foot detached garage in the southeast corner of the rear yard, approximately 5 feet from the rear lot line (10 feet closer than the existing garage) and 5.6 feet from the south side lot line (2 feet closer than the existing garage). Access to the garage will be obtained from the existing driveway which will not increase in size to accommodate the new structure. The design of the new garage is proposed to compliment the Tudor architectural style of the home with stucco siding, an asphalt shingled roof, and entry porch and panel doors. HPB Meeting Minutes August 11, 2009 Page 2 of 8 Attention to detail with windows and /or doors is demonstrated on three of the four elevations. The east elevation has been left blank for two reasons: 1. There is a substantial privacy fence that shields this view from the neighboring properties, and 2. Adding a window would make the garage less secure Ms. Repya pointed out that the height of the proposed garage is shown to be 17.62 feet at the highest peak, meeting the maximum 10% higher allowed when compared to the adjacent detached garages (2 feet taller than the existing garage). The height at the mid -point of the gable is shown to be 12.4', a height of 8' is provided at the eave line; and the ridge line is shown to be 21.5' in length. The roof is designed with a 10/12 pitch. The maximum lot coverage allowed for the property is 30 %. The proposed plan will maximize the allowed lot coverage on the property to 29.99% Consultant Robert Vogel has reviewed the plan and observed that the purpose of the design review guidelines in the district's plan of treatment is to promote responsible preservation practices and provide philosophical consistency to the design review process. In this case, the applicable standard is visual compatibility with the house and the neighborhood with respect to size, shape, massing, exterior finish and ornamental treatment. Mr. Vogel cited that in his opinion, the subject new garage appears to be compatible with the size, scale, mass, color and materials of the house, neighboring homes, and the district as a whole. He added that the garage will not harm any historic feature that contributes to the heritage preservation value of the Country Club District, and encouraged the Board to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new detached garage. Planner Repya explained that Staff agrees with Consultant Vogel and recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed new detached garage. • Subject to the plans presented. • A year built (2009) plaque or sign is placed on the exterior of the new detached garage. Findings supporting the recommendation include: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the proposed project. • The proposed detached garage will compliment the architectural style of the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent historic structures. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Plan of Treatment and Zoning Ordinance HPB Meeting Minutes August 11, 2009 Page 3 of 8 Applicant Comments: Darren Senn, — Project Designer Mr. Senn explained that the proposed garage will be a vast improvement over the existing dilapidated garage. The :design which is, rather straight forward will compliment the house and be only. somewhat -larger due to the limited..additional lot coverage available on the lot. The design guidelines for the Country Club District have been adhered to -with the exception of the blank Wall'on,the back of the structure that borders the southerly side yard. A window, has not been included because a fence currently abuts that elevation, ,and the homeowner believes the garage- would,:be more secure without a window.. Board Member Comments: Member Forrest noted that in the letter to the Board the comment was made that the concrete driveway would be drastically reduced in area, however upon reviewing the survey it appears that the amount of hardcover will be about the same. Mr. Senn admitted that while the existing turn around space will be removed, there will be additional concrete to accommodate the garage being set back further to the easton the lot; so perhaps the amount of concrete will be about the same. Member Rehkamp Larson asked who owned the fence abutting the rear of the proposed garage and if real stucco was'. roposed for the garage. Mr. Senn stated that it is his understanding that the fence belongs to the abutting neighbor. . He added that the garage will be clad with real stucco. Motion & Vote: Member Kojetin moved for approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new detached garage at 4625 Casco Avenue subject to the plans presented and a year built sign or plaque is installed on the exterior of the structure. Member Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye: The motion carried. III. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None IV. TRAINING: Historic Contexts Consultant Robert Vogel.. explained that in 1999 the City of Edina contracted his firm to complete an Historic Context Studyswhich is a plan ning'document used for identifying and evaluating historic properties in the city. The document includes information-on the city's significant_historical events- and. patterns of events organized around ten 'important themes, .and delineates. .a range- of historic property types.that connect the themes to actual buildings, sites, structures, and districts within the city limits. The document also highlights information needs, 3 HPB Meeting Minutes August 11, 2009 Page 4 of 8 preservation planning goals, and the linkages between statewide and local historic contexts. Mr. Vogel pointed that Edina's Historic Contexts are unique because they are two- tiered. The first tier represents three broad, general themes in Edina's history: • The Native American Landscape (10,000 B.C. to A.D. 1851) • The Agricultural Landscape (1851 to 1959) • The Suburban Landscape (1887 to 1974) These themes are city -wide in geographic scope and are linked with the statewide historic contexts developed by the MN SHPO. The second tier are more narrowly defined both in terms of their thematic and geographic focus, and include the following seven study units: • Edina Mills: Agriculture & Rural Life (18857 to 1923) • The Cahill Settlement: Edina's Irish Heritage (1850's to 1930's) • Morningside: Edina's Streetcar Suburb (1905 to 1935) • Country Club District: Edina's First Planned Community (1921 to 1950) • Southdale: Shopping Mall Culture (1955 to 1974) • Country Clubs and Parks: The Heritage of Recreation, Leisure and Sport (1910 to 1974) • Minnehaha Creek: From Wilderness Stream to Urban Waterway (10,000 B.C. to A.D. 1974) Each of the seven study unit includes a brief description and information relative to the following sub - headings: • Significant Events /Patterns of Events • Major Bibliographic References • Historic Property Types • Representative Properties • Information Needs • Preservation Planning Goals /Priorities Mr. Vogel pointed out that the Historic Context Study is a document that should not sit on a shelf gathering dust, rather one that should be added to as the city recognizes areas of interest. An example he cited was the recent interest in the churches of Edina. It would make sense to add a study unit to identify and research the churches in the city, particularly with the most recent interest in potentially designating several of the churches Edina heritage landmarks. Another area pointed out as a potential for area study was the West Minneapolis Heights neighborhood in the northwest quadrant of the city. This area that borders the city of Hopkins dates back to the 1850's when housing was created to support a tractor factory and the railroad in Hopkins. This is also the area of the city where the Coddington House (2009 Heritage Award recipient) is located at 300 Blake Road. 4 HPB Meeting Minutes August 11, 2009 Page 5 of 8 Board members found it interesting that the context study includes a study unit for Minnehaha Creek, but not one for the Nine Mile Creek. Chairman Rofidal stated that with the most recent interest in Nine Mile Creek spurred on by the Three Rivers District's trailway plan, he has received inquiries from residents asking if the HPB has addressed the historic significance of the creek. Consultant Vogel explained that Minnehaha Creek has been identified as an historic resource because it feeds into the Mississippi River, and historically supported the Edina Mill; whereas the Nine Mile Creek has not been identified as an historic resource. Mr. Vogel added that to the best of his knowledge, an archaeological survey of Nine Mile Creek in Edina has not taken place. Member Kojetin, who serves on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Directors pointed out that it is his understanding that Edina's City Council has requested the Three Rivers Park District to undertake an environmental study of the creek in Edina before they make a decision on the trailway request. Mr. Vogel was pleased to hear that, pointing out that an historical evaluation should be a part of the EAW report. He also offered to provide Planner Repya with historical criteria that she could pass on the City's Park Director. Concluding the training on historic context, Consultant Vogel pointed out that the HPB will periodically add to the study units in the context study. Currently, there is a lot of public interest in post -war resources from the 1950's and 1960's which makes up a great deal of Edina's infrastructure. Edina has experienced a large influx of tear -down and rebuilding of structures built in that era; and while these buildings may not be saved, it is important for the city that their existence be identified and recorded. Board members thanked Mr. Vogel for explaining the significance of historic context to the work they do; and agreed that they looked forward to the September training on Identification & Surveys. V. PLANNING COMMISSION HPB SECTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE: Chairman Rofidal reported that he attended a meeting with the Planning Commission on July 29th along with representatives from the Transportation Commission and Park Board. Each board /commission had an opportunity to explain areas of interest and /or concern with the City's Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Rofidal shared that following issues important to the HPB: 1. The 12 foot minimum driveway width in the Zoning Ordinance exceeds the widths of all the driveways in the Country Club District which average from 7 to 9 feet. 2. The side yard setback requirements preclude the construction of historic architectural styles such as American Colonial homes in the Country Club District. HPB Meeting Minutes August 11, 2009 Page 6 of 8 3. 850.20, Subd. 10. D. of the Zoning Ordinance sets out a 45 day time frame for the HPB to complete review of Certificate of Appropriateness applications. That time frame should be extended to 120 days. 4. The preservation of trees is an important component in protecting Edina's historic resources. 5. The importance of identifying, recording and when applicable preserving the historic of Edina's commercial properties. Board members briefly discussed the items addressed. Member Stegner asked if minutes from the work session with the Planning Commission could be made available to the HPB. Planner Repya stated that she would make sure that Board members received the minutes when they are made available. Board members thanked Chair Rofidal for representing them at the work session, and looked forward to see the implementation of some or all of their suggestions. VI. HPB SURVEY RESULTS: Chairman Rofidal explained that over the course of the past few years, the HPB has dealt with many issues and COA's on a monthly basis. Sometimes the process has worked smooth and other times the Board has been caught up in time management issues which might be avoided with better planning and leadership. Addressing "planning ", Chair Rofidal asked, "What can we do as a Board to ensure that our time is managed so that everyone who wants to speak (including the Public) has a fair chance to do that? What steps can we take going into a meeting to move our business along so that we are not there any later than necessary?" Rofidal pointed out that the second part is "leadership ". Somebody has to lead and lead effectively so that we accomplish what we want to get done. This has to be done tactfully and with regard to accomplishing objectives. Mr. Rofidal added that some members of the Board have voiced concerns on the time management issue. To address those concerns and keep qualified people on the Board, since the July meeting, each Board member received a brief CONFIDENTIAL survey; a majority of the surveys were completed and the results tabulated. Chair Rofidal summarized the following responses to the survey: • To maintain order, Board members should raise their hands to be recognized toward the goal of only one conversation going on at a time. • Discussions should be focused to pertinent information, with limited reiteration. HPB Meeting Minutes August 11, 2009 Page 7 of 8 • Subcommittees to work on policy changes is a good idea. • Mixed responses to starting the meeting earlier. Some members have challenges wrapping up their work day. Perhaps starting Y2 hour earlier, at 6:30 p.m. and striving to end by 9:00 p.m. would work. • Some members suggested having a time frame for items on the agenda. Board members briefly discussed Chair Rofidal's summary. The following comments were made: Member Forrest suggested that at the beginning of each meeting the Chair explain the meeting procedures. Member Montgomery expressed a desire to keep the start time at 7:00 p.m. due to Board members work and school schedules and commitments. Consultant Vogel pointed out that in some cities the meetings start at 6:30 p.m. with non - action items handled between 6:30 and 7:00 with the action items (COA's, etc.) addressed at 7:00 p.m.. In these cases, the meeting is advertised as starting at 6:30. The board discussed this Idea with the general consensus being that it would be too confusing, and Board members probably would not come until 7:00 anyway. Mr. Vogel also pointed out that the COA's for detached garages in the Country Club District have taken up a lot of the meeting time with the Board ultimately approving the garage plan that the applicant has worked on with Staff. Starting in 2010, Mr. Vogel said he will propose that Staff review the COA's for detached garages and report to the Board each month. The Board briefly discussed Mr. Vogel's suggestion and agreed to discuss his idea further at the September meeting. VII. MN HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE — SEPT. 17 & 18,2009: Planner Repya reported that the upcoming MN Preservation Conference on September 17th and 18th will be held at the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum in Chaska. Because Edina is a Certified Local Government city, we are required to send at least one board member to the conference each year. As in years past, there is scholarship money available to cover the cost of the conference, but only for those attending both days. Board members Bob Kojetin and Arlene Forrest offered to attend the conference on both days. Planner Repya stated that she would submit their reservations as well as the grant application for their scholarships. HPB Meeting Minutes August 11, 2009 Page 8 of 8 VIII. OTHER BUSINESS: A. COA Procedures Chairman Rofidal reported that the new COA procedures have been formatted and are now in use. He thanked Member Forrest for her hard work on completing that task. B. Nine Mile Creek Chairman Rofidal explained that he received an inquiry from a resident regarding whether or not the HPB had any jurisdiction over the Nine Mile Creek, particularly in light of the proposed trailway being considered by the Park Board and City Council. A general discussion ensued. Mr. Vogel pointed out that the question to be answered is whether or not the trail will have an impact on any heritage resources; and as pointed out previously, until an environmental study is conducted, one doesn't know if heritage resources exist. Planner Repya agreed to check into the process for the environmental study and report back to the Board at the September meeting. IX. CORRESPONDENCE: None X. NEXT MEETING DATE: September 8, 2009 XI. ADJOURNMENT: 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted Joyce Repya