Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010-02-16_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 16, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk (`) in bold print are Consent .Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of February 1, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of February 1, 2010 and Work Session of February 1, 2010 PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — 2010 Community Development Block Grant, Resolution No. 2010-22 B. PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, The Waters Senior Living of Edina, 6200 Colonial Way, Resolution No. 2010 -25 & Resolution No. 2010 -26 C. PUBLIC HEARING — Intention To Issue Capital Improvement Plan Bonds and Adopt Amendment to Capital Improvement Plan for 2010 Through 2014, Resolution No. 2010 -24 Agenda/Edina City Council February 16, 2010 Page 2 III. AWARD OF BID A. 2010 Fiber Optic Location Contract Renewal B. Braemar Golf Course Greens Mower IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2010 -23 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) B. Farmers Market Ordinance Amendment 2010 -03 (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) C. Appointment Art Center Board D. Debt Compliance Policy E. Ridge Road Update F. Request Commissioner of Transportation To Complete Speed Study W66th Street — Trunk Highway 100 to Valley View Road Resolution No. 2010 -27 G. Amend Metropolitan Council Housing Agreement V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated February 4, 2010, TOTAL $711,381.03; and Pre -List dated February 11, 2010, TOTAL $1,629,236.72; and Credit Card Transactions dated 12/28/09 — 1125/10, TOTAL $3,364.67 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence Agenda/Edina City Council February 16, 2010 Page 3 VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Feb 16 Work Session - Joint Meeting With BETF 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wed Feb 17 State of The Community Address 11:00 A.M. ENGINBOROUGH GREAT HALL Tues Mar 2 Work Session - Joint Meeting with HRRC 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Mar 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wed Mar 10 Annual Meeting With Board, Committees & Commissions 5:00 P.M. BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Tues Mar 16 Work Session - Housing 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Mar 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 23 Study Session 7:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Apr 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sat Apr 17 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 A.M. EDINA SENIOR CENTER Tues Apr 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Apr 27 Study Session 11:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Thur Apr 29 Volunteer Recognition 5:00 P.M. EDINBOROUGH GREAT HALL MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 1, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Bennett for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 2010. APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for January 19, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:026 p.m. Respectfully submitted Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 1, 2010 7:02 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF JANUARY 19, 2010 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 19, 2010, and Work Session of January 19, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — GOLF CARS BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for golf cars, Braemar Golf Course, to the recommended low bidder, Versatile Vehicles, Inc. at $140,525.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. TOWN HALL MEETING SCHEDULED City Manager Hughes reviewed the dates of the last two town hall meetings that were held on the fourth Tuesday of the month, noting the date of March 23, 2010, would be six months following the last town hall meeting. The Council discussed availability and the desired meeting format. Council consensus was reached to follow the same format as the last town hall meeting with direction from Mayor Hovland should one topic become predominate, and to schedule a town hall meeting on Saturday, April 17, 2010, at the Senior Center from 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. BOARD, COMMITTEE AND COMMISSION MEMBERS APPOINTED Mayor Hovland referenced the Council's recommendations for appointment as detailed in the staff report and indicated the Zoning Board of Appeal appointment would be handled at a future date. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, confirming the Mayor's appointments to various advisory boards, committees and commissions as follows: Art Center Board - Steven E. Carlson; Board of Appeals & Equalization - Michael Friedberg; Edina Community Health Committee -Kumar Belani and Carolyn Peterson; Heritage Preservation Board - Claudia Carr, Colleen Curran, and Ross Davis; Human Rights & Relations Comm ission - Damaria Moore; Park Board -Ellen Jones and Louise Segreto; and Edina Transportation Commission -Josh Sprague, Nathan Franzen and Paul Nelson. All appointments are for three -year terms ending February 1, 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Hughes noted the City's ordinance indicated new appointees took office at the March meeting; however, there were many meetings scheduled in February. Council consensus was reached that new appointees would take office at the March meeting and were welcomed to attend February meetings. The Council thanked candidates who made application for appointment, noting they were highly qualified and it was difficult to choose among them. *HEARING DATE SET (FEBRUARY 16, 2010) — COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY REZONING, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND Page 1 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /February 1. 2010 PRELIMINARY PLAT, THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA, 6200 COLONIAL WAY Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett setting public hearing date of February 16, 2010, for consideration of comprehensive guide plan amendment, preliminary rezoning, preliminary development plan, and preliminary plat for The Waters Senior Living of Edina, 6200 Colonial Way. . Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -18 ADOPTED — APPROVING LOT DIVISION, 5500/5504 HALIFAX LANE, TONY GIANNAKAKIS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -18, approving lot division of 5500 and 5504 Halifax Lane, Tony Giannakakis. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET (MARCH 2, 2010) — NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett setting public hearing date of March 2, 2010, for consideration of an intoxicating on -sale liquor license for Raku Japanese Restaurant. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPOINTED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett to appoint Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent, as Assistant Weed Inspector for calendar year 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Bennett approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 21, 2010, and consisting of 34 pages: General Fund $135,609.88; Communications Fund $600.76; Working Capital Fund $18,999.39; Art Center Fund $12,888.54; Golf Dome Fund $17,691.73; Aquatic Center Fund $39.23; Golf Course Fund $8,042.89; Ice Arena Fund $18,330.91; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $47,930.69; Liquor Fund $175,747.92; Utility Fund $57,100.90; Storm Sewer Fund $3,548.45; PSTF Agency Fund $2,036.74; TOTAL $498,568.03 and for approval of payment of claims dated January 28, 2010, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $551,484.34; Communications Fund $1,234.98; Police Special Revenue $175.86; Working Capital Fund $1,660,397.48; Art Center Fund $3,537.03; Golf Dome Fund $1,042.50; Aquatic Center Fund $264.37; Golf Course Fund $5,348.22; Ice Arena Fund $239.07; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $33,342.45; Liquor Fund $169,533.03; Utility Fund $84,680.90; Storm Sewer Fund $31,798.58; PSTF Agency Fund $2,726.38; TOTAL $2,545,805.19. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 16, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the February 1, 2010, meeting available. Page 2 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL FERUARY 1, 2010 5:00 P.M. Mayor Pro Tem Housh called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. in the Community Room at City Hall. Answering roll call were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, and Mayor Pro Tem Housh. Mayor Hovland arrived at 5:30 p.m. Edina Energy and Environment Commissioners present were: Commissioners Christianson, Hanson, lyer, Paterlini, Platteter, Sierks, Latham, and Thompson. Absent were Commissioners Risser and Lee. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. Assistant City Manager Worthington explained the Green Step Cities Pilot Program to the City Council. She noted that after the pilot program Minnesota cities would have an opportunity to become a Green Step City. The City Council and Commissioners discussed specific topics related to Green Step Cities. The Energy and Environment Commission made the following recommendations to City Council members for consideration: 1. Endorse Energy and Environment Commission's (EEC) Green Step Cities Work Plan. 2. Evaluate Edina's continued part in the Green Step Cities after the pilot program. 3. Consider options for implementation of the best practices including funding. The City Council endorsed the recommendations and thanked the Commission for all their hard work. The consensus was to have a follow up meeting after the pilot program ended. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk James C. Hovland, Mayor To: Mayor & City Council From: Joyce Repya Associate Planner Date: February 16, 2010 REPOR Agenda Item II. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 2010 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Action RECOMMENDATION: TION To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Approve recommended 2010 CDBG budget for submission to Hennepin County. INFO/BACKGROUND: The CDBG Community Development Block Grant Program is a federal entitlement program administered by HUD who in turn, charges Hennepin County to oversee the distribution of funds to its communities. These funds are to be directed toward improving housing opportunities and providing a suitable living environment for persons with low and moderate incomes. As a recipient of HUD funds, the County, and each community must affirmatively further fair housing. Hennepin County encourages all communities to be proactive by addressing impediments to fair housing choices. Edina's 2010 budget allotment for planning purposes is $161,303, unchanged from the final 2009 budget received in May, 2009 which reflected a $2,347 increase over the initial $158,956 proposed. When the final budget was determined, Hennepin County advised all communities that the additional funding should be directed toward only one project rather _ than prorating the increase among all the recipients; hence the Rehabilitation of Private Property project received the increased funding. The Final budget for FY2010 will be announced in May 2010, and may reflect a slight increase or decrease. The accompanying resolution includes a clause authorizing the City Manager to adjust the project budget to reflect a potential change in funding. Public Services HUD stipulates that funding for public services may not exceed 15% of the total budget; thus, Edina's 2010 allotment for public services may not exceed $24,195. The Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC) reviewed the requests for funding and agreed with the proposed budget to the following providers: • Senior Community Services (H.O.M.E. - Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly) - provides housekeeping and chore services to Edina seniors who pay for services on a sliding fee scale; • Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) - provides housing programs for low and moderate income homeowners and homebuyers; and HOME Line - provides tenant advocacy services for Edina renters. PROVIDER 2009 2010 BUDGET REQUEST/ PROPOSED H.O.M.E. $12,800 $17,165 C.A.P.S.H. $ 3,050 $ 5,000 HomeLine $ 2,030 $ 2,030 TVS - career dev. $ 5,505 $ 0 TOTAL $23,843 $ 24,195 Communitv Develovment After the $24,195 distribution for public services, $137,108 remains to be directed toward community development projects. Staff recommends directing $55,108 of these funds to the Rehabilitation of Private Property program which provides deferred repayment loans of up to $30,000 to make structural improvements to owner occupied single - family homes. Eligibility for the program is based on a household income schedule established by HUD for the Minneapolis/ St. Paul area. The income limits may not exceed 80% of the median household income. In 2009, CDBG funds assisted 5 homeowners to make structural improvements to their homes. Staff anticipates that the program will continue to attract income eligible homeowners interested in improving and maintaining their homes. West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) is requesting $82,000 for their Homes Within Reach program to provide an affordable homeownership opportunity using the Community Land Trust model for one homebuyer. The Community Land Trust model removes the market value of the land from the mortgage equation, which reduces the cost of a home for a work -force family by approximately 35 -42 percent, making it more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. WHAHLT owns the land and the homeowner owns the home. A Ground Lease signed by both parties defines and secures the roles and responsibilities of both WHAHLT and the homeowner, including, but not limited to a resale/ recapture provision, and long -term rights and use of the land. You will recall that one of the strategies identified in the Housing element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City is committed to fund and expand its financial and technical support of community land trusts. Attesting to this goal, the City has provided funding to WHAHLT in the following ways: In 2007, the Council redirected $245,481 of Scattered Site Affordable Housing Funds to WHAHLT , and with those funds, three homes were purchased, rehabilitated and sold using the land trust model. e The 2008 and 2009 CDBG contributions totaled $164,000 to WHAHLT enabling them to purchase another two community land trust homes in Edina. Moving forward, the proposed $82,000 to be directed toward WHAHLT's purchase of a sixth land trust home, reinforcing the City's commitment to providing affordable housing opportunities in the community. Staff recommends the following distribution of 2010 CDBG funds for community development purposes: 2009 2010 Activity Budget Proposal Rehabilitation of Private Property $ 55,460 $ 55,108 WHAHLT $ 82,000 $ 82,000 TOTAL $137,460 $137,108 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-22 APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2010 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, the city of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the city of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of 2010 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the city held a public hearing on February 16, 2010 to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use of $161,303 from the 2010 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina approves the following projects for funding from the 2010 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County. Activity Budoet Rehabilitation of Private Property $55,108 Homes Within Reach — Affordable Housing $82,000 Senior Community Services (HOME) $17,165 Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) $ 5,000 HOME Line $ 2,030 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and its City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2010 Community Development Block Grant Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the final amount of FY2010 CDBG available to the city be different from the preliminary amount provided to the city, the City Council hereby authorizes the city manager /administrator to adjust project budget(s) to reflect an increase or decrease in funding. Dated: February 16, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 16, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 2010 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City: EDINA 2. Project Name: REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY 3. Contact Person/ Phone No. JOYCE REPYA 952/826 -0462 B. PROJECT DATA 1. CDBG Funding Requested $ 55,108 (needs to be same as council resolution) 2. Is this an existing CDBG - funded project? X Yes 3. Project Location: Citywide X 4. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the local need(s) the project will address.) This project provides rehab loans for income eligible Edina homeowners of single dwelling unit properties to make structural improvements to their homes. Administration of this project is pursuant to Hennepin County Rehab guidelines. Edina has funded this project since year 1 of the CDBG program. 5. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary chart below, identify what priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.) Priorities Use X to indicate Rental Housing Existing Housing Rehabilitation X First Time Homeownership Homelessness - prevention Needs Housing -Special Public Service Neighborhood Revitalization -Transportation Services 1 6. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of persons to receive services, number of affordable housing units to be rehabilitated or built, etc.) The City anticipates assisting four or more eligible Edina homeowners to make structural improvements to their homes. 7. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period. Expenditure period begins July 1, 2009 and ends December 31, 2010.) Task: Rehab Homes Task: Task: Date 7/10 —12/11 Date Date 8. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate.) FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT CDBG $55,108 Prior Year CDBG Funding (for this project) $53,113 Other Federal Funds (specify) $ Low Income Housing Tax Credits $ State (specify) $ Municipal $ Metropolitan Council $ Private (specify) $ Other (specify) $ Project Total $108,221 2 Homes kiN kh- January 19, 2010 Joyce Repya City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Dear Joyce; Thank you for the opportunity to submit the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust ( WHAHLT), known as Homes Within Reach (HWR), 2010 Edina CDBG application. WHAHLT is seeking financial support from the City of Edina to accompany other matching resources to create an affordable home in the Edina community. This application will enable HWR to continue creating and preserving affordable homeownership in Edina using the community land trust practice, thereby allowing homeownership to be affordable for work -force families, since it removes the market value of the land from the mortgage equation. All of the homes within the resale- restricted domain of the Community Land Trust are designed to remain affordable (term of lease -99 years) regardless the number of times the home sells. Homes Within Reach offers Edina and homebuyers the ability to sustain long -term affordable homeownership that fulfills a unique need in the community. Therefore, we safeguard the community's investment in affordable housing using the community land trust practice. As of December 31, 2009, HWR has created and preserved seventy -one (71) affordable homes since its inception in 2002. Of which five affordable homes are located in Edina; in addition, HWR is currently searching for the sixth property. The CDBG application consists of the fillable form and multiple exhibits - A through D; in particular, Exhibit A outlines the Project Description. I was not able to insert the exhibits in the fillable form; therefore, I created separate attachments. We appreciate and thank the City of Edina for their support in assisting those we serve in becoming homeowners. We look forward to continuing our partnership in addressing the needs of affordable homeownership in the community of Edina. Again, thank you for taking the time to review and. consider our proposal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 401 -7071. Sincerely, Janet A. Lindbo Executive Director West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust 952 - 401 -7071 tel info @HomesWithinReach.org 5101 Thimsen Avenue, Suite 200, Minnetonka, MN 55345 952. 224 -2857 fax �n 2010 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING (fillable form. Use one form per project) A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City: Edina 2. Project Name: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) 3. Contact Person/ Phone No. Janet A. Lindbo, 952- 401 -7071 B. PROJECT DATA 1. CDBG Funding Requested $ 82,000 (needs to be same as council resolution) 2. Is this an existing CDBG - funded project? ❑Yes ®No 4. Project Location: Address - Specific address has yet to be determined. Once award has been determined and executed, HWR will search and acquire a property based on purchase price, condition of property, location, matching funding contributions and applicants' needs or Citywide - NA 4. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the local need(s) the project will address.) Please see Exhibit A for Project Description for proposed activity 5. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary chart below, identify what priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.) Priorities Use X to indicate Rental Housing Existing Housing (Rehabilitation) X First Time Homeownership X Homelessness Special Needs Housing Public Service Neighborhood Revitalization Transportation Services 6. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of persons to receive services, number of affordable housing units to be rehabilitated or built, etc.) In creating one affordable home using the HWR program in Edina, it will touch the lives of approximately seven families (28 men, women & children) over the course of the 99 -year lease. Therefore, this request does not produce homeownership for just one family, but will assist multiple families over the course of the life of the lease. The three principal features of the HWR program continue to appeal to the targeted population, they include the cost of homes, the quality of home and their location. WHAHLT/HWR's initiative is consistent with the suburban communities' goals because it will increase the number of affordable, owner - occupied units. In addition, the HWR program assists in reducing the pressure to build either new housing by preserving existing affordable units or converting existing housing for workforce households. As referenced above, over the years, future work -force families will benefit because the home's re- purchase price will be permanently affordable through the Land Trust as affordable homeownership. Therefore, providing a long -term practice for families to become homeowners stabilizes families and in turn adds value to the community, where they work and or live. In addition, it permanently protects the investment of the subsidy by the City and WHAHLT's various other funding sources when using the Community Land Trust practice. HWR proposed activity would support and revitalize neighborhood stability in times of economic down turn at the same time of maximizing the one -time investment in preserving affordability. In addition, the program makes maximum use of existing buildings and community's infrastructure. The community's infrastructure is a major selling point to the buyer, and in return, the new family provides value and benefits with respect to the following: - community's growth, delivery of services, increasing the labor pool available to local businesses, reducing freeway congestion given the opportunity worker can live near their work, adding younger households to the community where the population is often aging and of course the investment into affordable housing. 7. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period. Expenditure period begins July 1, 2010 and ends December 31, 2011.) 2 Task: Task: Task: Date Date Date Please refer to Exhibit D, which provides a overview of a timeline and tasks to implement the proposed activity using the land trust practices. This timeline is based on HWR average over a seven years of experience in implementing the program. 8. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate.) FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT CDBG $82,000 Prior Year CDBG Funding (for this project) $ Other Federal Funds (specify) HOME $45,000 Low Income Housing Tax Credits $ State (specify) $20,000 - MH Municipal $ Metropolitan Council $ Private (specify) $4,000 Other (specify) $ Project Total $151,000 3 REQUEST: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) is seeking a grant of $82,000 to assist in creating and preserving the proposed seventh Edina affordable home using the community land trust practice, for work -force households with low - to- moderate incomes (50 % -80% of the area median income). INTRODUCTION• West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) is a Community Land Trust providing permanent affordable homeownership to workforce families in the western suburbs of Hennepin County. In May 2001, the formation of West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT), a non- profit corporation took place and the organization began acquiring properties and selling the improvements to qualified low -to- moderate income homebuyers in the Spring of 2002. The establishment of WHAHLT was in direct response to the City of Minnetonka's interest in developing a means of increasing the number of long -term affordable homes in Minnetonka for work -force households; thereby making efficient use of its financial investment and providing long term affordability for the Community's essential workers. Currently, HWR has implemented its program in ten Hennepin County suburban communities In 2004, WHAHLT introduced the program's name Homes Within Reach (HWR) to the public in response to better describing the organization's vision, mission and values. In 2007, Homes Within Reach began working with the City of Edina to provide housing for people in all stages of life in the community. Our collaborative purpose was to establish a program to create and preserve affordable homeownership in Edina. To date we have assisted five families in purchasing a home. In addition, we are currently searching for the sixth property. However, due to the long -term affordability of the land trust, the five families assisted will more likely mean that over the course of the 99 -year lease, 35 families will benefit in owning an affordable home in the City of Edina. The two components that are the driving forces in the creation and growth of West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust, dba Homes Within Reach are: Q Social Component of promoting homeownership for lower to moderate income families 0 Financial Component of protecting the public's investment in affordable homeownership Vision, Mission, Values West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust vision is to transform people's lives through homeownership. The mission is to use the Community Land Trust Practice to provide housing for working families that would be otherwise unable to buy in the West Hennepin suburban communities and offering both communities and homebuyers the ability to sustain permanently affordable homeownership. The core values are the principles and beliefs that guide the organization as it pursues its goal and objectives - they are: • Belief in home ownership • Bringing stability into people's lives • Creating value for communities and families 1. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The West Hennepin Affordable provides communities with the and enhance the community's vitality through collaborating with public agencies and private organizations to address the need for affordable homeownership in the City of Edina and other western suburban Hennepin County communities. Population served: • HWR's target market is households with incomes at 80% or less of Area Median Income (AMI). Prospective homeowners generally will have household incomes between 50% - 80% AMI. • In practice, HWR has experienced an average AMI of 57.7% and 62.3% in Edina • Average HWR homeowners' income is $41,412 • Average Edina HWR homeowners' income is $46,470. Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) opportunity to create sustain and preserve affordable housing WHAHLT -HWR addresses affordable homeownership in that it removes the cost of land from the housing, price by separating ownership of the land from that of the house. Hence, WHAHLT - HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified income families. Two features, permanent housing affordability and subsidy retention creates the affordability of the units within the CLT practice. The homes are made permanently affordable for work -force homeowners through contractual controls embedded in the ground lease, even after the resale of the homes. When the WHAHLT homeowner sells their house, WHAHLT retains the ownership of the land. Thus, subsidies to WHAHLT to purchase land, stay with WHAHLT and incorporate perpetual affordability in the land trust practice. The land is leased to homeowners through a 99 -year renewable lease that affords the owner most of the same rights as any other property owner. The removal of the market value of the land from the mortgage equation provides initial affordability. Permanent affordability is otained through: A pricing formula that provides the owner with a fair amount of equity while ensuring that the resale price of the home is affordable and ➢ A resale restriction that require the homeowner to sell the house either to another 2 2002- 2002= Categories 2009• ' 2009 Comments HWR Edina Totals Totals Currently searching to Total HWR Parcels 71 5 acquire the sixth property HWR Average Income $41,412 $46,470 Per Household Served 2009 HWR Average $44,852 $46,841 Per Household Income served HWR Area Median Income and family Income Served ( %) 57.7% 62.3% size drives AMI calculation HWR Average Final $909 $1053 Mortgage. Amount 2009 HWR Average Final Mortgage $135,490 $145,252 Amount Includes one resale in HWR Resale 1 0 Minnetonka in 2007 and expecting 1 or 2 in 2010 not in Edina Household Size 3.4 3.2 HWR Number Persons 252 16 Served HWR Households 72 5 Includes one resale in Minnetonka in 2007 Number of 10 1 Communities Served WHAHLT -HWR addresses affordable homeownership in that it removes the cost of land from the housing, price by separating ownership of the land from that of the house. Hence, WHAHLT - HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified income families. Two features, permanent housing affordability and subsidy retention creates the affordability of the units within the CLT practice. The homes are made permanently affordable for work -force homeowners through contractual controls embedded in the ground lease, even after the resale of the homes. When the WHAHLT homeowner sells their house, WHAHLT retains the ownership of the land. Thus, subsidies to WHAHLT to purchase land, stay with WHAHLT and incorporate perpetual affordability in the land trust practice. The land is leased to homeowners through a 99 -year renewable lease that affords the owner most of the same rights as any other property owner. The removal of the market value of the land from the mortgage equation provides initial affordability. Permanent affordability is otained through: A pricing formula that provides the owner with a fair amount of equity while ensuring that the resale price of the home is affordable and ➢ A resale restriction that require the homeowner to sell the house either to another 2 qualified houshold or to WHAHLT/ HWR. Please refer to Exhibit B & C attached to this document, where it further summarizies the Equity Resale Provisions of the Land Trust model and two page overview of how the Community Land Trust works. A Capital Improvement Amendment to the Ground Lease is available to homeowners; providing homeowners a possibility where they can receive a 100% appreciation on approved "capital" improvements. To date, two homeowners applied for this benefit option. Therefore, a one -time investment in the cost of the land and other related expenses creates a permanently affordable home. HWR maximizes the effectiveness of the investment in affordable housing while providing the benefits of home ownership to households that are otherwise unable to buy a home in Edina. Overall the program offers value and benefits to the families it serves and the community; in promoting stable families and a strong community through housing and economic growth for 11 a. As of 12/31/2009, HWR has acquired seventy - one (71) properties in ten Hennepin County suburban communities including Edina and we have sold seventy -one (71) homes to qualified families, in addition to one (1) resale. With respect to the 2010, Edina proposed activity; a specific location has not yet been predetermined prior to funding this proposed activity. Properties typically are acquired as opportunities arise due to the nature of HWR acqusition process. Homes Within Reach Housing Production Chart 2002 -2008 2009 ® ■ Sold Homes 200: ■ 2007 2006 2005 ■ Purchased 2004 2003 properties 2002 F_ 7- 0 20 40 60 80 In terms of concentration of HWR homes, they will be scattered throughout the Edina community. One of the acquisition steps prior to making an offer to purchase is the approval of the location of the property by the City. The homes purchased typically fit well within the neighborhoods they are located; therefore, the development of affordable housing when updating and preserving the integrity of the property provokes less neighborhood opposition, since it fits the neighbhorhood character and improves its appearance and condition and continues to revitalize the area. Required repair and rehabiliative work are those activities of rehab that will provide our buyers good operating condition of the home and property, promote a safe environment and permit the reuse of structurally sound buildings, many of which were constructed in a manner that is superior to some of today's housing products. COMMUNITY NEED: The demand for affordable homeownership continues to be strong for work force, low and moderate - income families in the City of Edina and the western suburbs of Hennepin County. A number of factors, including but not limited to the area's population growth, new job and replacement openings, and the cost of housing outpacing individual resources, continues to drive this need. Who cannot afford to buy a home, include workers who provide essential services to the City of Edina and surrounding areas; such as custodians, various health care workers, teachers, police, firefighters, clergy, retail staff, office personnel, customer service representatives, chefs, wait staff and many more. Please refer to the following chart on the next page tabulated by Minnesota Housing Partners, using the Minnesota Department of Revenue statistics. 3 Housing Affordability by Essential Service and $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Common Occupations, Minnesota 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: MHP - via MN Department of Revenue & Bureau of Labor Statistic Registered nurse median earnings Middle school teacher Nursing aide Childcare worker Office clerk Cashier � Food prep worker —�-- Income needed for median priced apt Income needed for median priced home The issue of affordable housing continues to be increasingly important in the community of Edina now and in the future. Please refer to the attached chart (Exhibit A.1) of the Twin Cities Region Affordable Housing Units Needed, 2011 to 2020 as determined by the Advisory Panel to Metropolitan Council Staff, estimating the needed affordable housing units in Edina now and in the future. The panel used four factors in allocating affordable housing needs across the Twin Cities for 2011 -2020. They include, household growth potential, ratio of local low -wage jobs to low -wage workers, current affordable housing and transit service. .lob Growth: Minnesota employers are expected to shed additional jobs as the recession affects the state's labor market according to the Minnesota Employment Review: The decline will be widespread with losses anticipated in 19 of 23 industries in Minnesota and four industries will be adding workers over the coming year. However, two - thirds of job cutbacks will be concentrated into five industries; nondurable -goods manufacturing, administrative and support services, construction, durable -goods manufacturing and retail. Nevertheless, in the next 12 months, many occupations will be adding workers; the health care and social assistance sector is expected to add jobs. Total job openings will approach 67,000 with replacement and new positions combined. This is twice the number of jobs lost in 2009. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development created the following chart of the top 20 occupations when ranked by "total job openings" 11 op Occupations with Most Total Job •.- 3rd Quarter Forecast Forecast Forecast 2009 Openings from Net Total Job Employment Employment Replacement Openings Forecast Growth Openings Cashiers 63,496 -1,189 4,092 4,092 Waiters and Waitresses 49,671 -896 2,997 2,997 Retail Salespersons 76,993 -483 2,655 2,655 Registered Nurses 56,598 906 748 1,654 Office Clerks, General 70,220 -892 1,309 1,309 Laborers & Freight, Stock and Material Movers, Hand 33,808 -1,151 1,200 1,200 Combined Food Preparation and Serving Workers, Including Fast Food 59,525 100 989 1,089 Customer Service Representatives 38,992 4 1,079 1,083 Stock Clerks and Order Fillers 35,777 -767 1,043 1,043 Personal and Home Care Aides 31,260 486 494 980 Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners 45,305 -333 819 819 Counter Attendants, Cafeteria, Food Concession, and Coffee Shop 6,806 -70 780 780 General and Operations Managers 31,805 -777 717 717 Tellers 10,368 175 536 711 Receptionists and Information Clerks 24,846 -180 678 678 Host and Hostess, Restaurant, Lounge and Coffee Shop 6,443 -146 672 672 Amusement and Recreation Attendants 9,977 12 652 664 Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing 31,026 -298 652 652 Team Assemblers 131,741 -1,111 648 648 Protective Service Workers, All Other 1 15,182 -28 1611 611 Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Even with the changes in the housing market, the cost of homeownership exceeds what workforce families can afford. Since, WHAHLT -HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified income families. The cost of the land and rehab is the major components of the Sources & Uses of a project. Land values in the City of Edina typically range from $75,000 - $160,000 for homes available to first time homebuyers. Over the past twelve months, HWR has experienced approximately a 5 -15% reduction in price of first -time market -rate homeowner properties (entry-level homes) with increased rehab costs. In addition, with the market changes, the ability to meet lender's new and changing requirements becomes more difficult for HWR applicants. Today, many of the jobs that are available or are being created do not pay wages that are adequate to afford homeownership in the suburban area. In addition, WHAHLT /HWR's proposal will support the efforts to reduce pressure to build either new housing by preserving existing affordable units or converting existing housing to workforce housing. As stated previously, our average sale price contrasts favorably to current median sales prices in Edina and suburban Hennepin County with respect to the past, current and future market conditions. In addition, HWR will assist the City of Edina in their endeavor of stabilizing the community by supporting the current residents in their aging /lifecycle process and enabling newcomers and families to join the community, revitalize the housing inventory, and support the investment in the delivery of the community's infrastructure. 5 Property Prices: The following chart is information from the Realtor Public Policy Partnership for 2002 -2007 and Regional Multiple Listing Service for 2008 & 2009. The chart highlights the number of homes sales and median sales prices of homes, in Edina an other suburban communities HWR serves. Overall the median sale price decreased 17% percent compared to 2008. In addition, if you compare the reported median sale price with HWR average Edina sales price of - $145,800 you can understand the benefit and value provided in creating and preserving affordable homeownership using the Community Land Trust practice. C Change in - -. T Total median sales price y $135,000 $175,000 from 2008 to 2009 -23% Brooklyn Park 1000 Eden Prairie 773 $251,500 $280,000 -10% ® $324,900 Golden Valley Maple Grove F216 976 $262,500 $270,850 $222,000 $250,000 -11% Minnetonka 635 $247,000 $265,950 FNew Hoe FRichfield 225 549 $158,000 $186,820 $165,000 $185,650 -15% -11% St. Louis Park 671 $213,000 $227,000 C Exhibit A, 1 Exhibit 2 Summary Table: Affordable Housing Need Allocation in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 2011 •2020 Housing Need Adjustment Factors Units Added /Subtracted per New Growth Summarv: Job Housinq Transit Factor Affordable Sewered Sewered Households Proximity 1 Stock Service Housing Communities ratio: lower- Pct. of units transit Units wage jobs to affordable at service level Job pox- Housing Transit Needed Net lower -wage or below 60% 1 through 4 imity1 Stock Service a 2011 -2020 2010 2020 Growth workers Of HUD AN Hennepin County Bloomington 37,700 39,200 1,500 1.46 21% 2 213 41 92 627 Brooklyn Center 11,800 12,200 400 1.51 30% 2 63 0 25 163 Brooklyn Park 28,168 32,000 3,832 1.51 27% 2 600 35 235 1,590 Champlin 8,500 9,200 700 .89 12% 3 -23 39 0 179 Corcoran 1,800 4,500 2,700 1.30 13% 4 247 141 -165 816 Crystal 9,700 10,100 400 1.57 26% 2 70 5 25 173 Dayton (pt.) 1,000 7,000 6,000 .78 22% 4 -406 147 -368 942 Deephaven 1,450 1,500 50 1.92 2% 3 14 4 0 26 Eden Prairie 24,200 25,500 1,300 2.01 10% 3 402 80 0 685 Edina 21,600 22,000 400 1.93 20% 2 114 12 25 212 Excelsior 1,250 1,330 80 1.68 48% 3 17 -4 0 29 Golden Valley 9,000 9,200 200 1.87 18% 2 53 7 12 104 Greenfield 153 285 132 .83 12% 4 -7 7 -8 25 Greenwood 320 330 10 1.92 5% 3 3 1 0 5 Hassan Twp. _ 718 718 .95 4% 4 -10 57 -44 174 Hopkins 8,518 8,818 300 1.93 43% 2 85 -12 18 143 Independence 232 260 28 .77 2% 4 -2 2 -2 6 Long Lake 900 1,000 100 1.59 23% 3 18 2 0 40 Loretto 280 290 10 1.31 29% 4 1 0 -1 3 Maple Grove 24,500 30,144 5,644 1.14 7% 3 243 398 0 1,844 Maple Plain 922 950 28 1.14 36% 4 1 -1 -2 6 Medicine Lake 180 190 10 1.72 15% 3 2 0 0 4 Medina 1,118 2,240 1,122 1.38 5% 4 132 86 -69 384 Minneapolis 172,000 181,000 9,000 1.88 47% 1 2,415 -469 552 4,088 Minnetonka 22,300 23,111 811 1.80 12% 2 199 45 50 421 Minnetonka Beach 236 238 2 1.74 3% 3 0 0 0 1 Minnetrista 1,600 2,700 1,100 1.09 2% 4 29 94 -67 306 Mound 4,350 4,600 1 1.13 28% 3 10 2 0 68 New Hope 9,100 9,600 _ _ 500 1.60 31% 2 92 -2 31 213 Orono 2,256 2,950 6941 1.62 4% 3 133 55 0 311 Exhibit A, 1 Exhibit 2 Summary Table: Affordable Housing Need Allocation in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 2011 - 2020 *Cities that are split between two counties are shown in the county with the largest share of the population Job Proximity Ratio: The ratio of local low -wage jobs (within 10 miles of the community's center - point, and paying less than $41,000) divided by local working residents (living within 10 miles of the center - point, earning less than $41,000). The ratio was calculated for each community by the Metropolitan Council using the US Census Bureau's Local Employment Dynamics data set for 2003. 21-Iousinq Stock Affordability: The percentage of a community's total housing units that are affordable to low- income households (earning at or below 60% of the Twin Cities 13- Gounty MSA Area Median Family Income (AMI), as determined by the U. S. Department of Housing & Urban Development). 3Transit Service Level: This number is a classification of transit service available in communities as determined by the Metropolitan Council. It is expressed as one of four levels: 1 = regular, frequent transit service to many points all through the day (only Minneapolis and St. Paul fall in this category); 2 = frequent service, but limited destinations (mostly inner -ring suburbs in this category); 3: some transit service, but very limited in frequency and destinations (many second and third -tier suburbs in this category); 4 = no regular transit service. Growth Summary: Housing Need Adjustment Factors Units Added /Subtracted per Factor New Affordable Job Housinq Transit Sewered Sewered Households proximity) Stock Service' Housing Communities Ratio: lower- pct of units transit Units wage jobs to affordable at service level Job prox- Housing Transit Needed Net lower -wage or below 60% Imityl Stock a 2011 -2020 2010 2020 i through 4 Service Growth workers of HUD AMl Hennepin County (cont.) Osseo 1,090 1,200 110 1.04 46% 2 1 -5 7 28 Plymouth 29,000 31,500 2,500 1.59 14% 3 455 123 0 1,045 Richfield 16,500 18,000 1,500 1.93 29% 2 427 5 92 765 Robbinsdale 6,500 7,000 500 1.65 29% 2 100 2 31 222 Rogers 4,685 5,173 488 .92 5% 4 -13 37 -30 112 St. Anthony* 4,000 4,300 300 1.48 34% 2 44 -4 18 117 St. Bonifacius 1,100 1,100 - .96 22% 3 0 0 0 - St. Louis Park 22,000 23,000 1,000 1.86 26% 2 264 12 61 501 Shorewood 2,750 2,870 120 1.60 3% 3 22 10 0 53 Spring Park 1,000 1,080 80 1.71 40% 3 17 -2 0 31 Tonka Bay 744 760 16 1.67 8% 3 3 1 0 7 Wayzata 2,100 2,200 100 1.77 24% 3 24 2 0 44 Woodland 23 25 2 1.90 1% 3 1 0 0 1 *Cities that are split between two counties are shown in the county with the largest share of the population Job Proximity Ratio: The ratio of local low -wage jobs (within 10 miles of the community's center - point, and paying less than $41,000) divided by local working residents (living within 10 miles of the center - point, earning less than $41,000). The ratio was calculated for each community by the Metropolitan Council using the US Census Bureau's Local Employment Dynamics data set for 2003. 21-Iousinq Stock Affordability: The percentage of a community's total housing units that are affordable to low- income households (earning at or below 60% of the Twin Cities 13- Gounty MSA Area Median Family Income (AMI), as determined by the U. S. Department of Housing & Urban Development). 3Transit Service Level: This number is a classification of transit service available in communities as determined by the Metropolitan Council. It is expressed as one of four levels: 1 = regular, frequent transit service to many points all through the day (only Minneapolis and St. Paul fall in this category); 2 = frequent service, but limited destinations (mostly inner -ring suburbs in this category); 3: some transit service, but very limited in frequency and destinations (many second and third -tier suburbs in this category); 4 = no regular transit service. Exhibit B Equity Resale Provisions: The home purchased by HWR applicants in Edina using the land trust practice will be part of the resale- restricted domain of WHAHLT - HWR and will remain affordable for low- moderate income households, through one resale after another, and continue to serve homebuyers without the need of additional subsidies, regardless the number of times the home sells (99 -198 years). The Ground lease (executed between WHAHLT -HWR and the homeowner) protects the assets of the land by providing the land trust certain rights to safeguard the condition and affordability of the home. HWR homes cost less than market rate homes because HWR homebuyers purchase only the house and enters into an agreement with WHAHLT- HWR for the use of the land. By taking the cost of the land out of the real estate transaction, land trust homes are more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. Given that WHAHLT -HWR owns the land and the homeowner owns the home, the homeowner and WHAHLT -HWR sign a long -term legal document called a Ground Lease that defines the roles and responsibilities of both WHAHLT - HWR and the homeowner. The Ground Lease allows the homeowner to secure, long -term rights to the land. The homeowner is responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the house and on the land. The homeowner may sell his /her home only to a qualified buyer or'WHAHLT- HWR. The resale price is limited by a formula which more then likely'(based on market conditions) allows the seller to recover the original cost of the house plus a modest profit. Therefore, assuming the house has retained or increased in value, the homeowner who sells his or her home will get all of their equity (the amount of money that they used as a down payment as well as the entire principal paid to that point in time). In addition, to a percentage (35% for WHAHLT) of the home's appreciation (the amount that a home has increased in value since it was purchased). Please see the attached m How the Community Land Trust Model Works - Exhibit C Exhi -hit C How the Community Land Trust Model Works A Community Land Trust (CLT) establishes initial affordability by removing the market value of the land from the mortgage equation. For example, a CLT could purchase and existing owner - occupied home when placed for sale on the open market and then sells the home to a low -to- moderate- income household. The CLT retains ownership of the land and enters into a 99 -year ground lease with the leaseholder- homeowner. Removing the market value of the land from the mortgage equation results in a lower, more affordable monthly payment of principal and interest. In addition, it results in a lower down payment and closing costs. A CLT ensures permanent affordability of the home through two provisions found in the Ground Lease. The first is a pricing formula that provides the owner with a fair amount of equity, while ensuring the sale price for subsequent low -to- moderate - income households is affordable. The second provision requires the homeowner to sell either to another low -to- moderate- income household or to the CLT. In addition, the provisions ensure the home continues to be affordable with each sale. A CLT leaseholder- homeowner receives benefits similar to non -CLT homeowners such as the ability to build equity, the federal mortgage interest and property tax deduction and the ability to pass on the lease interest and home to their heirs. The following Chart A compares the Conventional. and CLT approaches to affordable owner- occupied housing. Chart A ntl y; Aske F�eque ,d a. Q'uesteons ,, i o . How long can the affordability of the home be guaranteed? `Conventional iViodel Under state statue, conventional purchases can be guaranteed affordable for a maximum of 30 years, the most allowed under State statue. CLT Model Affordability is made permanent through the use of a 99 -year renewable Ground Lease How are buyers affected after the initial, subsidized sale of the home? There may be no guarantee that subsequent buyers, after the initial buyer, will be of low- to- moderate - income The land trust model guarantees that every subsequent homebuyer will be of low -to- moderate - income. The investment provides a limited time benefit. The affordability is lost: 0 After first sale or; What happens to the public and 0 When the resale The investment is never lost. private investment used to restriction expires or; The affordability recycles with subsidize the initial purchase? 0 When the resale each new homeowner. restriction is not Maintained. Additional public investment will be required to replace the lost affordable units. Exhibit C. Chart B provides an example of how the CLT creates initial and permanent affordability (99 years plus). The example compares_ the.difference in affordability after ten years under the CLT and conventional model Chart B Chart B: Affordability Com arson CLT Model Conventional Model Acquisition costs Market Value Land $ 63,000 $ 63,000 Market Value Home $ 117,000 $ 117,000 Total $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Subsidy Subs id /Affordability Gap $ 63,000 $ - Sale Price $ 117,000 $ 180,000 Housing Costs Principal and Interest $ 816 $ 1,255 Property Taxes $ 200 $ 200 Mort a e and Homeowner Insurance $ 135 $ 135 Land Lease Fee $ 30 n/a Total Monthly Princi al, Interest, Taxes, Insurance $ 1,181 $ 1,590 Down Pa ment $ 5,850 $ 9,000 Closin Costs $ 2,779 $ 4,275 Market Value After 10 Years Market Value Home $ 190,581 n/a Market Value Land and Home n/a $ 293,201 Increase in Value 2 $ 73,581 $ 113,201 Sale Price Calculation after 10 Years Percentage of Appreciation to Owner 35% 100% Owners Share of Appreciation 1 $ 25,753 $ 113,201 New Sale Price of Home $ 142,753 $ 293,201 . Mortgage Interest Rate 8 %, Term 30 years, Loan to value 95% 2 Annual average increase in market value 5% The above chart illustrates that removing the value of the land from the mortgage equation to create initial affordability results in a monthly savings of principal and interest of $404, and saves $4646 in down payment and closing costs. The CLT leaseholder- homeowner pays property tax on both the home and the land, even though they do not own the land. Federal, State, City and private contribution pay to fund the land, development and rehab expenses. The above example illustrates acquisition costs of several years ago with no other subsidy cost but land that is not the case today. Typically, funding covers land acquisition, buyer assistance, rehab, holding and administrative costs. In addition, Chart B demonstrates that after ten years, the CLT home sells for $142,753 as opposed to $293,201 under the conventional model, a difference of $150,448. There are two primary factors to account for this difference. First, the land has been permanently removed from the speculative market. Secondly, the homeowner receives only a percentage of the appreciation of the home when they decide to sell. In the above example, the owner receives 35% or $25,753, based on a formula that is standard among CLTs across the United States, where the homeowner receives only a portion of the appreciation in order to make the home affordable for each subsequent sale. . 2 Homes Within Reach Exhibit D Selection, Acquisition, Selling Process & Timeline Based on historical events Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Creation of one Affordable Home . ,Application Process Informational Meeting Application Orientation & Homebuyer Education Interviews and Income verification Meeting with Lender process application Pre - approvals 2. Acquisition Property Search Property Selection Purchase Offer of Selected Property Due - Diligence Period & Admin - Determine Scope of Rehab, LC, Finalize offer, remove contingencies Acquire property Rehab 3. Selling Process Selection of Property Mortgage Application and approval HWR Resident Committee Interview, Execute PA, Finalize income eligibility Execute PA, home inspection, attorney review Closing - coordination with funders, buyers, closer ACTION Exhibit D TIMING 1. Applications Process 2 -6 months a. Attendance by prospective applicant to a HWR Informational Meeting b. Submission of HWR application with required financial attachments. i. Applicant meet with CAPSH regarding credit reports, sign wavier for HWR to receive copy ii. HWR orientation and compliance with qualifications and criteria iii. Applicant meet with HWR staff to review credit reports and assist in meeting qualifications and finalize income verification to ascertain eligibility and obtain a mortgage iv. Attendance of a Home Stretch Class sponsored by Minnesota Homeownership Center is required. This education is to provide basic tools to move through the process and own a home. v. Participation in the interviews and working sessions with HWR staff vi. Income verification of eligibility per HOME regulations vii. Select lender from approved list of CLT lenders and process application viii. Pre - approval from one of five lending institutions, Bremer Bank, Kate Wilson Team, MidCountry Mortgage, US Bank and Wells Fargo 2. Acquisition & Rehab 3 -6 months a. Property Search i. Criteria to Real Estate Agent based on application pool /profile realtor previews ii. Inspect 3 -6 properties before selecting one to continue the process b. Initial Inspection - Property Search Criteria i. Location i. Scattered site 2. Neighborhood setting with close proximity to services c. Foundation /Structural Integrity i. No evidence of substantial settlement Exhibit D ii. No excessive dampness iii. Concrete floor in basement iv. Concrete or treated wood perimeter foundation v. No major structural defects d. Exterior L Minimum of 5 years life expectancy of current roof ii. Serviceable siding e. Interior i. Separate cooking facilities with stove and refrigerator ii. Separate bathing facilities iii. No excessive peeling of potentially lead -based paint iv. Ventilated attics and crawl spaces v. Ventilated bathrooms (operable window or exhaust fan) vi. Minimum of 6 square feet of countertop in kitchen vii. Bathroom and kitchen floors impervious to water f. Mechanical i. The following can be repaired, replaced; however access, condition of home and replacement cost will determine feasibility of purchasing the property ii. Operating HVAC system and or feasibile to replace iii. All wells and private sewage system approved by government authority iv. Adequately functioning plumbing v. Reasonably insulated vi. Minimum of 100 amp service vii. Grounded circuits for all appliances viii. No hazardous wiring or fixtures ix. GFIs in kitchen, baths and garage g. Property Selection 1 -2 days L Research Hennepin Property Information ii. Create Preliminary Project Budget to determine if acquisition is feasible iii. Determine affordability gap & funding sources. iv. Acquisition Approval from City v. Initial Offer: Decision Point h. Purchase Offer of Selected Property (foreclosed properties take additional time) i. Multiple offers in negotiating initial purchase price prior to the contingency period. 3 Exhibit D ii. If Applicable: Counter Offer iii. Offer - Accepted / Not Accepted i. Execute Purchase Agreement - if land funded by HOME or CDBG - prepare 1. Non - profit Purchase Letter and 2. Seller Acceptance of Voluntary Offer ii. Execute Purchase Agreement (PA) b. Due - Diligence Period - PA Contingency Period i. Includes at least three levels of inspections 1. WHAHLT Contractor 2. House Masters 3. Hennepin County c. Determine Rehab /Construction Requirements using the three inspections i. Complete WHAHLT Inspection Form d. Request and Finalize Line of Credit for acquisition 1 -2 days e. Finalize Offer and Remove Contingencies if appropriate or renegotiate price or release the PA f. Implement Pre - closing Action Items i. Pursuant to HWR Property Acquisition Checklist g. Acquire Property i. Pursuant to required real estate transaction - law and lending practices h. if using Home -AHIF funds 60 days from PA execution - acquire property due to i. Environmental & SHPO review j. Post Purchase Action Items - i. Ready the property to move to the Selling Home Process & Procedures and Application Checklists. ii. During the selling /selection process, a qualified family is approved and rehab /repair work has begun on the home and completed prior to selling the home. iii. Identify and perform rehabilitation work that is necessary to make the acquired homes hazard free and safe and ready the home for sale to a qualified homebuyer. k. Rehab Process include but are not limited to: 20 -60 days 1. Inspections 2. Preparation of inspection report 3. Determine scope of work and cost estimates 4. Determine rehab work plan, provide written specifications 4 Exhibit D 5. Negotiate and execute scope of work - proposal /contract 6. Commence and complete work 7. Contractor presents to WHAHLT /HWR invoice for work with all permits and required inspections 8. Final inspection of work completed with permits /approvals and lien waivers 9. WHAHLT /HWR makes payment to contractor 2. Selling Process 3 -6 months During the selling /selection process, a qualified family receives approval by HWR and a preliminary approval by the lending institution and rehab /repair work has begun on the home and completed prior to selling the home. i. HWR supervises the process to sell the home using the Community Land Trust practice and the funding requirements and if HOME CDBG or AHIF monies are used the HOME requirements are applied and followed. b. Mortgage application and approval c. HWR Resident Committee Interview d. Selection of Property - show and select a home by a qualified applicant with a mortgage pre - approval by an approved CLT lender e. Execution of PA and all attachments and riders necessary f. Applicant Inspection of home i. Applicant typically is required by lending institution to have a third party inspection and HWR encourages the applicant to engage in a third party inspection- even if it is not required. g. Attorney review of documents (including the ground lease) and review with prospective homebuyer h. Closing transaction i. Selling of the home improvements - submitting documentation to HOME and AHIF for verification and covenants ii. Execution of the ground lease and mortgage 5 Executive Committee Marvin Johnson President James Grist 1 st Vice President 'January 14, 2010 Jeanette Metz 2nd Vice President Joyce Repya Associate Planner John Lawson Treasurer City of Edina 4801 West 5& Street Woody Love Secretary Edina, MN 55424 Cheryl Fischer Member -at -Large Dear Ms. Repya, Gene Winstead Member-at-Large . Thank you for the opportunity to submit a CDBG application to Sharon Burnham the City of Edina for $17,165. The H.O.M.E. program operating Past President budget for the City of Edina is $26,000. The Edina Housing Board Members Foundation has partnered with the H.O.M.E. program in the past to David Fisher make up the difference in our operating budget for the city. Marty Guritz Sandy Hewitt Julie Holmes Thank you for your consideration of our proposal to support Rebecca Hoover Senior Community Services' H.O.M.E. program. Please let me• Aiko Higuchi Ron Klecker know if you would like more information. With the support of the y Laurie Lafontaine City of Edina, the H.O.M.E. program will continue to reach out to Joy Linsday seniors with the homemaking and chore support they need to stay Dr. Chinyere (Ike) Njaka independent. Thank you for your generous past support of Senior Senator Gen Olson Community Services, and for your commitment to the health, Thad Standley Keith Stuessi safety and happiness of the seniors we serve. Benjamin rechhart Sincerel D Executive Director & C.E.O. Programs *Transportation •Community Senior Centers Deb Taylor •Senior Outreach *H.O.M.E. Chief Operating Officer *Health Insurance Counseling 'Caregiver Support Services . Q A United Way Supported Agency surer os Charities Review Council •7&Tn6er Er&mare Partners" Senior Community Services • 10709 Wayzata Boulevard, #111, a Minnetonka, MN 55305 • 952.541.1019 httpJ /www.seniorcommunity.org 2010 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING (fellable fonn. Use one form per project) A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City: Edina 2. Project Name: H.O.M.E. Program (Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly) Contact Person/ Phone No. Kitty Engle /952- 888 -5530/ k.engle@seniorcommunity.org B. PROJECT DATA 1. CDBG Funding Requested $ 17,165 (needs to be same as council resolution) 2. Is this an existing CDBG - funded project? ®Yes ❑No 3. Project Location: Address or Citywide X 4. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the local need(s) the project will address.) The H.O.M.E. (Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly) program helps seniors stay in their homes with dignity. It seems like every day we hear about people losing their homes to foreclosure. It is frustrating that there really isn't anything we can do to help these folks. There is another group of our neighbors that could lose their homes this year, not to foreclosure but to the inability to care for their homes. This is a group we can help stay in their homes through supporting the H.O.M.E. program. H.O.M.E. services are provided on a sliding contribution scale. H.O.M.E. is able to offer its services to seniors regardless of ability to pay. But this is only possible with community support. H.O.M.E. Services include: • Homemaking(dishwashing, laundry, grocery shopping, meals and cleaning) • Lawn mowing • Snow removal • Interior and exterior painting • Seasonal outdoor work (raking, pruning, weeding, mulching) 1 • Minor repairs (leaky faucets, door handles, replace light bulbs) • Disability- related projects (for example, installing grab bars) Over 80% of H.O.M.E. clients are unable to pay the full cost of services. For them, H.O.M.E. is a lifesaver that helps them age with dignity in their own homes. Program offices are located at Creekside Community Center, 9801 Penn Avenue South, Bloomington; Senior Community Services 10709 Wayzata Blvd., #111, Minnetonka; Minnetonka Community /Senior Center, 14600 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka. Clients gain access to the program either by contacting one of the H.O.M.E. offices or by referral by an area agency. Revenues are derived from client fees, Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging, cities in which H.O.M.E. operates, United Way, private foundations, client contributions and Friends of H.O.M.E., an organization that solicits donations from businesses, churches, community groups and individuals. 5. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary chart below, identify what priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.) Priorities Use X to indicate Rental Housing Existing Housing (Rehabilitation) First Time Homeownership Homelessness Special Needs Housing Public Service X Neighborhood Revitalization Transportation Services 6. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of persons to receive services, number of affordable housing units to be rehabilitated or built, etc.) . In 2009, H.O.M.E. served 95 Edina seniors and provided 3,195 hours of service. From 2008 to 2009 the number of hours of service increased by 471 hours! It is anticipated that H.O.M.E. will slightly increase the number of seniors served and hours of service in 2010. 2 7. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period. Expenditure period begins July 1, 2010 and ends December 31, 2011.) Task: Ongoing delivery of H.O.M.E. services including: Maintenance (minor carpentry, plumbing, electrical repairs and interior /exterior painting); Chore Services (lawn mowing and snow shoveling); and, Homemaking (cleaning, vacuuming, dusting, washing clothes and window cleaning). Date Ongoing Task: Date Task: Date 8. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate.) FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT CDBG $69,353 Prior Year CDBG Funding (for this project) $12,800 Other Federal Funds (specify) MAAA $77,123 Low Income Housing Tax Credits $ State (specify) $ Municipal $ Metropolitan Council $ Private (specify) $130,181 (Community Foundations, Friends of H.O.M.E., United Way, other Foundations) Other (specify) $344,302 (Bloomington HRA, Client Fees & Program Revenue) Project Total $633,759 3 Helping People. Changing Lives. Z mmunity tion. P A R T N E R S H/ P PART Of OF SUBURBAN HENNEPIN AMERICA's POVERTY FIGHTING NETWORK To help meet increasing demand for foreclosure counseling, CAPSH expanded its foreclosure prevention staff from 7.5FTE to 9 FTE (6 counselors and 3 supportive staff). The additional staff capacity allows CAPSH to dedicate a foreclosure prevention counselor to serve homeowners from the city of Edina and its surrounding communities. Regardless of the trend or condition of the housing market, CAPSH will continue partnering with the city of Edina to ensure access to 33 10th Avenue South housing services for low to moderate - income households. Suite 150 Hopkins, MN 55343 Tel 952- 933 -9639 Fax 952 - 933 -8016 www.capsh.org � Our mission: To improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin County by creating and supporting links between individuals and OPPORTUNITY communities through: service, education, and collaboration. February 2, 2010 Energy Assistance Homebuyer Education City of Edina 4801 W. 50`h St. Foreclosure Prevention Edina, MN 55424 Reverse Mortgage Counseling Attn: Joyce Repya Home Maintenance &Rehab RE: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin Homeless Services 2010 Application for CDBG Funding Employment Counseling Budget Counseling Dear Joyce Repya: Planning & Development Community Development Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin ( "CAPSH ") is pleased to Tax Assistance submit its 2010 CDBG Public Service Funding request to the City of Edina. We are Voter Education & Registration requesting $5,000 for the purpose of funding the CAPSH Full -Cycle Home Asset Development Ownership Program. Homeless Services CAPSH, as the anti - poverty Community Action agency serving Suburban Hennepin Fiscal Agent Services County, has provided residents of Edina with services since 1992. CAPSH services Individual Development Accounts to Edina include: full -cycle homeownership, energy assistance, employment counseling and financial / budget counseling. We look forward to continuing the partnership between CAPSH and the City of Edina in providing appropriate services to Edina residents. To help meet increasing demand for foreclosure counseling, CAPSH expanded its foreclosure prevention staff from 7.5FTE to 9 FTE (6 counselors and 3 supportive staff). The additional staff capacity allows CAPSH to dedicate a foreclosure prevention counselor to serve homeowners from the city of Edina and its surrounding communities. Regardless of the trend or condition of the housing market, CAPSH will continue partnering with the city of Edina to ensure access to 33 10th Avenue South housing services for low to moderate - income households. Suite 150 Hopkins, MN 55343 Tel 952- 933 -9639 Fax 952 - 933 -8016 www.capsh.org � Our mission: To improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin County by creating and supporting links between individuals and OPPORTUNITY communities through: service, education, and collaboration. Helping People. Changing Lives. community P A R T N E R S H/ P PART OF OF SUBURBAN HENNEMN 33 10th Avenue South Suite 150 Hopkins, MN 55343 Tel 952 - 933 -9639 Fax 952 - 933 -8016 www.capsh.org 121 our mission: To improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin County by creating and supporting links between individuals and OPPORTUNITY communities through: service, education, and collaboration. AMERICA'S POVERTY FIGHTING NETWORK If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to Energy Assistance contact me at 952- 933 -9639 ext. 211 Homebuyer Education Sincerely, Foreclosure Prevention Reverse Mortgage Counseling Home Maintenance & Rehab Homeless Services Nicholas Paul Cichowicz, J.D. Employment Counseling Sr. Grants Writer and Community Developer Budget Counseling Planning & Development Community Development Tax Assistance Voter Education & Registration Asset Development Homeless Services Fiscal Agent Services Individual Development Accounts 33 10th Avenue South Suite 150 Hopkins, MN 55343 Tel 952 - 933 -9639 Fax 952 - 933 -8016 www.capsh.org 121 our mission: To improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin County by creating and supporting links between individuals and OPPORTUNITY communities through: service, education, and collaboration. 2010 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING 6611able form. Use one form per project) A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. . City: Edina 2. Project Name: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin " CAPSH" — Full Cycle Homeownership Program. Contact Person/ Phone No. Marcy Harris: Director of Planning and Development. (952) 933 -9639 Ext 225; mharris @capsh.org B. PROJECT DATA CDBG Funding Requested $ 5,000 (needs to be same as council resolution) 2. Is this an existing CDBG - funded project? ®Yes ❑No 3. Project Location: The City of Edina and the rest of suburban Hennepin County 4. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the local need(s) the project will address.) Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin ( CAPSH) provides full -cycle homeownership services. These include: foreclosure prevention counseling and loan assistance; first -time homebuyer education and counseling; financial literacy and budget counseling; reverse mortgage counseling; and home rehab and maintenance counseling and education. Homeownership is still considered to be an important benchmark on the path to achieving the "American Dream" but for many families living in Suburban Hennepin County, including the city of Edina, homeownership is becoming more challenging then ever before. While the city of Edina is a desirable community for families, prospective and current Edina homeowners aren't immune from the falling home prices, increased foreclosure rates and a tighter credit market. During the program year 2009, CAPSH foreclosure prevention counselors experienced a rise in the number of Edina homeowners requesting foreclosure counseling. To help meet increasing CAPSH CDBG Application 2010 City of Edina Page 1 demand for foreclosure counseling, CAPSH expanded its foreclosure prevention staff from 7.5FTE to 9 FTE (6 counselors and 3 supportive staff). The additional staff capacity allows CAPSH to dedicate a foreclosure prevention counselor to serve homeowners from the city of Edina and its surrounding communities. Regardless of the trend or condition of the housing market, CAPSH will continue partnering with the city of Edina to ensure access to housing services for low to moderate - income households. 5. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary chart below, identify what priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.) Priorities Use X to indicate Rental Housing Existing Housing (Rehabilitation) X First Time Homeownership X Homelessness Special Needs Housing Public Service X Neighborhood Revitalization Transportation Services 6. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of persons to receive services, number of affordable housing units to be rehabilitated or built, etc.) Anticipated Results: CAPSH anticipates providing the following units of housing service to residents of Edina (reported per individuals): 0 First -time homebuyer workshops /counseling: 10 0 Foreclosure prevention: 38 0 Rehab /maintenance assistance: 4 0 Reverse mortgage: 12 CAPSH CDBG Application 2010 City of Edina Page 2 2009 Results: CAPSH's Full Cycle Homeownership Program provided housing services to 1,832 individuals in its homeownership programs during 2009 (over 4,300 households in all housing and housing related programs). In regards to the city of Edina, a total 49 households enrolled in CAPSH'S housing programs during the 2008 -2009 program year. Housing Proerams 2009 0 First -time homebuyer workshops /counseling: 7 0 Foreclosure prevention: 33 0 Rehab /maintenance assistance: 0 0 Reverse mortgage: 9 7. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period. Expenditure period begins July 1, 2010 and ends December 31, 2011.) 'ime Period Amount/Source Activity Person Responsible 7/1/2010 to $5,000 Ongoing full cycle homeownership services Scott Zemke, Director of 6/30/2011 Edina CDBG including: Operations First -time homebuyer workshops and counseling financial literacy training also provided) Foreclosure prevention counseling & loan assistance Rehab/ home maintenance counseling and education (includes some emergency repair) Marcy Harris, Dir., Reverse mortgage counseling Planning & Dev.; Don epree, Systems Admin. Reporting Completion Date Pngoing 8. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate) CAPSH CDBG Application 2010 City of Edina Page 3 Please see attached budget chart. The italicized figures are funds that are pending. CAPSH CDBG Application 2010 City of Edina Page 4 A I C I D I E I G H Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin 2 2009 - 2010 ComprehensiveHousing Programs Budget 3 4 Expenses ALL PROGRAMS FUNDING Sources of Funding 5 7 Component Edina CDBG Other TOTAL HUD 9 Sala $642,857.00 $5,000.00 $637,857.00 $642,857.00 MEOG/CDBG 10 Benefits $168,013.00 $168,013.00 $168,013.00 MHFA 11 Professional/Counseling services $34,828.00 $34,828.00 $34,828.00 Other Local CDBG 12 Travel $45,780.00 $45,780.00 $45,780.00 Hennepin Count 13 Publications, dues, cent. fees, training $317,900.00 $317,900.00 $317,900.00 Private Donations 14 Printing and supplies $15,760.00 $15,760.00 $15,760.00 15 Computer, Equipment & Related $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 17 Direct/Pass Through Assistance $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 19 Indirect rent, phone, etc. $41,132.00 $41,132.00 $41,132.00 20 Admnistration incl. supervision, postage) $338,944.00 $338,944.00 $338,944.00 21 22 23 TOTAL $1,637,214.00 TOTALI $1,632,214.00 $1,637,214.00 HOME 3455 Bloomington Ave Minneapolis, MN 55407 Joyce Repya Associate Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ms. Repya: Office Phone: 612/728 -5770 Hotline: 612/728 -5767 Fax: 612/728 -5761 www.homelinemn.org January 13, 2010 This letter is to request funding in the amount of $2,030 from the City of Edina's Community Development Block Grant Program to support HOME Line's services for renters. A copy of the 2010 CDBG Program Request for Funding is enclosed. Along with the CDBG Request Form, I am enclosing summaries of our hotline's service to Edina residents. HOME Line is building upon our depth of experience in serving Edina serving over 100 families a year. 20% of these families are facing critical housing situations involving landlords in foreclosure or evictions. HOME Line provides valuable advice to these families that is important for stabilizing their housing. We are working to meet these current challenges facing low- income renters and would like the City of Edina to continue as our partner in meeting these needs. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this application. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 612/728 -5770, extension 107 or Mike Vraa, our managing attorney at extension 113. Sincerely, f`d 1,41r,71 Beth Kodilluboy Executive Director enclosures as noted Tenant Advocacy in Minnesota 2010 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING A. GENERAL INFORMATION Community: Edina 2. Project Name: HOME Line's Tenant Advocacy Services Contact Person/Phone Number /email Mike Vraa, 612 728 -5770 x 113,mikev @homelinemn.org B. PROJECT DATA Funding Request $ 2,030 2. Is this request to fund an existing CDBG - FUNDED project? x Yes No 3. Project Location: Address: 3455 Bloomington Avenue, Minneapolis. 55407. HOME Line's tenant services are citywide. Tenants call our free hotline from their homes. Renter Education presentations are done in the local high schools. Immigrant Outreach would be with individual groups in the communities where they reside or where the social service provider is located. 4. Project Description: Briefly describe the proposed project. The narrative should include the need or problem to be addressed in relation to the Consolidated Plan (see attached table), as well as the population to be served or the area to benefit. Describe the work to be performed, including the activities to be undertaken or the services to be provided, the goals and objectives, method of approach, implementation schedule and anticipated results /accomplishments. We anticipate assisting approximately 105 Edina renter households over the hotline during the program year and offering educational presentations at Edina High School. Renters make up nearly 4,924 households in Edina, and many of these families have low incomes. When renters have problems involving their homes, those who don't know their rights and responsibilities can end up living in housing that is unsafe, lose security deposits that are rightfully theirs, or make decisions that cost them their home. HOME Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable. HOME Line will provide two distinct, but related, programs as part of this grant: a tenant hotline that provides free legal advice to tenants about landlord/tenant law and a high school educational program. These services prevent problems ranging from homelessness to illness from unsafe living conditions, and result in reducing the use of the city's emergency resources. Tenant Hotline The first of these programs is HOME Line's tenant hotline. The hotline began in 1992 as a service to Suburban Hennepin County residents. Today we serve the entire state (excluding _Minneapolis) and have recently taken our 120,000th call. Three staff attorneys and a tenant advocate work full time on the hotline along with 40 -60 law student volunteers each year. 104 Edina renter households called in 2009. In 2009, we helped to prevent the eviction of two Edina families. The most common reasons Edina residents call our hotline are repairs, security deposits, landlord foreclosures, evictions, break lease questions, questions about how proper notice to vacate is given, and lease questions. The need for this service in Edina is apparent -- Edina residents already rely on this valuable service. Tenants living in rental units (usually single - family homes or duplexes) have been encountering a growing problem in the last 3 years: the landlord being foreclosed on. Typically, the tenant has done nothing wrong and is usually current on their rent when they are served with a notice of an impending sheriff's sale (usually within 2 -3 weeks). Faced with this information, many renters simply vacate the rental unit. The law, however, probably allows them to stay in the home for 6- 9 months following the sheriff's sale. Since August 2008, HOME Line's phone number has been included in all foreclosure notices and briefly explains renter's rights in these situations. The difference between leaving in 3 weeks or having an additional 6 to 9 months to find suitable new housing cannot be overstated — people find adequate and livable new housing (and may have enough time to actually buy a home if they are on a homeownership track) and the kids may be able to complete their school year. Our primary objective with renters facing foreclosures is to provide information and advice. Once the tenant understands they don't have to leave prior to the sale, they can plan their lives accordingly instead of racing to vacate in three weeks. The goal is to make sure as many tenants know this as possible. HOME Line expects to serve 12 renter households in foreclosure situations in Edina in the next year. Since 1992, we have helped 15 renter households in Edina deal with landlords going into foreclosure. In 2009 alone, we helped 11 renter households in Edina facing foreclosure issues. While our services are available to all renters free of charge, over 90% of our Edina callers have low or very-low incomes; almost three quarters (68 %) of these callers are women; 19% are racial minorities. Our programs are aimed at low- income renters, high school students who are about to enter the rental market, and recent immigrants. We identify the key demographics at the beginning of each call. High School Renter Education Program The second program is our high school presentation program. To date, we have spoken to 1,026 classes (over 28,300 students) throughout the metro area. This presentation has awards from both Best Prep and B.E.E.F. (Business Economic Education Foundation). It focuses on the things that future renters should know, including how to avoid evictions, how to select roommates, security deposits and understanding leases. In Edina, in 2009 we spoke to 1 class and presented 32 students with information to prepare them for renting. 5. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Public Services: Family Services, Senior Services, and Youth Services. Priorities Rental Housing Existing Housing (Rehabilitation) First Time Homeownership Homelessness Special Needs Housing Public Service Neighborhood Revitalization Transportation Services Use X to indicate 6. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments projects will have. (i.e.; number of persons/households to be assisted/served, number of housing units to be rehabilitated/built, etc.) We anticipate between 95 and 100 callers utilizing our hotline services, representing 250 residents. We will offer our free high school training to Edina High School. Also see the attached two pages, which covers what HOME Line has accomplished in Edina in the past. 7. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur and date anticipated) Task: Renter counseling over hotline Task: High school presentations Date Ongoing Date Late fall and late spring 8. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate.) FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT CDBG $ 64,237 Prior Year CDBG Funding (for this project) $ 64,237 Other Federal Funds (FHPAP) $ 29,000 Low Income Housing Tax Credits $ 0 i State (specify) MN DHS $ 0 Municipal $ 7,957 Metropolitan Council $ 0 Private (specify) Foundations (attached) $ 153,530 Other (Training, Interest, Contributions) $ 52,237 $ 306,961 HOME Line Tenant Hotline Services Sources of Funds (Attachment) 35,25 0 Source: McKnight Foundation 90,00 0 Source: Funders Council (Foreclosure) 29,00 0 Source: Family Homeless Prevention & Assistance 35,00 0 Source: Hennepin County 10,00 0 Source: The McNeely Foundation 9,000 Source: The Hugh I Andersen Foundation 20,00 0 Source: Suburban Ramsey CDBG 8,000 Source: City of Plymouth CDBG 7,957 Source: City of Bloomington 3,550 Source: Hennepin County Consolidated CDBG 5,000 Source: City of Eden Prairie CDBG 9,475 Source: St. Paul COPP 3,000 Source: City of Maple Grove CDBG 2,030 Source: City of Edina CDBG 5,000 Source: City of Richfield CDBG 1,500 Source: City of Minnetonka CDBG 700 Source: City of New Hope CDBG 3,500 Source: City of Brooklyn Center CDBG HOME Line Renters' Hotline Edina Information on calls during the period 1/1/92 through 12/31/2009 Number of Calls Per year 150 127 118 129 101 98 96 93 105 94 83 104 100 63 74 77 76 67 71 78 50 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Over the past eighteen years, a total of 1,654 Edina renters have contacted HOME Line. This represents service to approximately 4,135 residents when all family members have been counted. HOME Line has helped Edina residents recover money from their landlords. Tenants have received $14,761 back from improperly withheld security deposits and $18,869 in rent abatements (refunds for living in substandard conditions). We have also helped prevent 46 evictions in this time. HOME Line's tenant hotline receives over 11,000 calls each year. These are the top ten topics in Edina over the last since 1992, followed by the number of calls: 1. Repairs 286 2. Security Deposits 198 3. Evictions 174 4. Notice to Vacate 161 S. Break Lease 155 6. Lease Questions 85 7. Privacy /Intrusion 64 8. Rent Increase 58 9. Fees 55 10. Heat 42 The vast majority (over 90 %) of Edina callers to HOME Line are very -low or low income (as defined by HUD): Callers HUD -Based lncamQ: 1992 -2003 Very -Lour 65°4, ❑ Low 244; ❑ Mod. 1095 Renter's Education HOME Line's High School Renter's Education Program provides advice on tenant rights and responsibilities. This free presentation covers most issues that first time renters are likely to encounter, including roommate problems, evictions, security deposits and repair problems. In the last eighteen years, HOME Line has gone to 1,026 different classes talking to 28,332 students. We have sent speakers to nearby schools, including Edina High School, Southview Middle School and Valley View Middle School. 2009 Edina Highlights HOME Line's Tenant Hotline In 2009, HOME Line's tenant hotline took 104 calls from Edina households (a 21% increase over 2008). We helped to prevent the eviction of two Edina families during this time. The top ten topics for calls in 2009 were: 1. Repairs 20 calls 2. Security Deposits 14 calls 3. Foreclosures 11 calls 4. Break Lease 9 calls 5. Evictions 8 calls 6. Notice to Vacate 5 calls 6. Fees 5 calls 8. Infestation 4 calls 9. Lease Questions 3 calls 9. Privacy /Intrusion 3 calls Foreclosures played a big role, as the third most common reason why renters called our hotline. Tenants living in rental units (usually single - family homes or duplexes) have been encountering a growing problem in the last 3 years: the landlord being foreclosed on. Typically, the tenant has done nothing wrong and is usually current on their rent when they are served with a notice of an impending sheriff's sale (usually within 2 -3 weeks). Faced with this information, many renters simply vacate the rental unit. The law, however, probably allows them to stay in the home for 6 -9 months following the sheriff's sale. Since August 2008, HOME Line's phone number has been included in all foreclosure notices and briefly explains renter's rights in these situations. The difference between leaving in 3 weeks or having an additional 6 to 9 months to find suitable new housing cannot be overstated — people find adequate and livable new housing (and may have enough time to actually buy a home if they are on a homeownership track) and the kids may be able to complete their school year. Our primary objective with renters facing foreclosures is to provide information and advice. Once the tenant understands they don't have to leave prior to the sale, they can plan their lives accordingly instead of racing to vacate in three weeks. The goal is to make sure as many tenants know this as possible. Bedbugs also came up increasingly in 2009. All 4 infestation calls featured tenants either being blamed for bringing in bedbugs, or having difficulty convincing the landlord to solve the problem. There were also two calls from tenants attempting to break a lease due to domestic violence. In the past, domestic abuse victims were not able to leave mid -lease without penalty, but Minnesota enacted a statute in 2007, which does allow this (provided the tenant gets an Order for Protection and still gives the landlord some notice). HOME Line was also able to make a presentation at Edina High School in the spring of 2009. HOME Line's Managing Attorney spoke to an independent living class of 32 students on how to get an apartment and not mess it up once they have moved in. �1 o e CD .ay To: Mayor & City Council From: . Cary Teague Planning Director Date: February 16, 2010 Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat for The Waters Senior Living of Edina at 6200 Colonial Way Planning Commission Recommendation: REPURURECUMMEN DAT1UN Agenda Item II.B. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution Ordinance Discussion The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment subject to the findings in the staff report, and subject to the condition that the City Council approve the rezoning and preliminary development plan for senior assisted living. Vote: 9 Ayes and 0 Nays. The Planning Commission further recommended approval of the Preliminary Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat subject to the findings and conditions in the Planning Commission staff report. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nays. The Planning Commission added three conditions: 1. The traffic study submitted by the applicant needs to be recalculated to take into account traffic counts when Edina schools are in session. 2. Implementation of the applicant's Travel Demand Management Plan, (TDM) plan as submitted. 3. Thirty units or twenty percent (20 %) of the project must contain affordable housing. Per Planning Commission recommendation, the applicant has done an addendum to the traffic study, which concludes that the existing roadways would still support the project. (See attached memorandum from RLK & letter from the assistant city engineer.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolutions, per the Planning Commission recommendations. Information/Background: • Staff Report, including letters from Edina residents commenting on the proposal. • Minutes from the January 27, 2010 Edina Planning Commission meeting. • Proposed Plans • Traffic study addendum • Resolutions • Letter from the applicant F1 The Waters Senior Living of Edina Affordable Housing Opportunity The Waters Senior Living and Colonial Church of Edina have partnered to create a senior living community on Colonial Church's campus. The partnership is based upon the very positive experience Normandale Lutheran Church has with the Colony of Eden Prairie where church members provide a variety of volunteer services to the seniors. Colonial Church will be selling 6 acres for the new senior housing for an up front discounted land price and a 30% ownership in the development. More importantly, Colonial Church will help create an intergenerational experience between the seniors and church members. The Need. There is a significant need for affordable assisted living senior housing. At every public meeting where the development has been presented, seniors have asked about the availability of affordable housing. There are approximately 10,000 Edina residents over the age of 65. The 2000 Census estimated approximately 30% of these residents have annual incomes below 50% of the area median income for a family of one ($28,300) totaling approximately 3,000 Edina residents. These seniors would benefit from the creation of affordable assisted living. In addition, the affordable housing would help Edina meet the Metropolitan Council's affordable housing goals. Effect on the Project The proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina assumes a 100% market rate senior housing community designed to be the finest senior living in Edina. The physical design of the facilities will not change if affordable housing is incorporated. The provision of affordable housing has an economic impact on the project. We expect to use Elderly Waivers from Hennepin County as the foundation of an affordable housing program. The Elderly Waiver helps pay a portion of the cost of the services that the senior needs to live on a daily basis. The alternative is for the lower income senior to go into a nursing home where the care and the governmental cost is more expensive. However, there is a risk that the Elderly Waiver program will be negatively impacted under the proposed health care reform or the Minnesota State Budget. This is a significant risk that we are willing to bear to create the affordable housing. The dilemma we face is that revenue from Elderly Waivers leaves an income gap as compared with an 100% market rate project. The following example illustrates this situation: One Bedroom Elderly Waiver monthly revenue $2,475 One Bedroom market rate with comparable services $3,400 Income gap from affordable unit $925 Number of affordable housing units (20 9/6) 30 Annual cost for the 30 affordable housing units $333,000 Next Steps We do not have any other means within the project of offsetting this gap. For this reason, we propose to partner with the City of Edina to create a plan than makes the inclusion of affordable housing financially feasible. Options that we would explore include tax increment financing, tax - exempt housing revenue bonds and city development fees. We would like to work with Edina staff to craft an affordable housing financing plan to present to the City Council and Mayor for your consideration when we return with the final zoning related approvals later this spring. RESOLUTION NO. 2010-25 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE COLONIAL CHURCH SITE AT 6200 COLONIAL WAY City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Water Senior Living on behalf of the Colonial Church is requesting a Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District - 5, and Preliminary Development Plan to build a 4- story, 150 -unit senior assisted living facility. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the west. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential/ commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. C. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-25 Page 2 those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina s housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure - capacity through wise land use. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District - 5, and Preliminary Development Plan to build a 4- story, 150 -unit senior assisted living facility. The property is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 2, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota. Approval is subject to the following conditions, which would also be required at the time of final development plan: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans date stamped December 29, 2009. 2. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 3. Final Park Dedication requirement would be determined at Final Development Plan approval. 4. Final Development Plans must be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Plans may be revised per conditions of the Watershed District. 5. Final Development Plans shall comply with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated January 21, 2010; the building official's memo dated January 7, 2010; and the fire marshal's memo dated January 11, 2010. 6. Implementation of the applicant's Travel Demand Management Plan, (TDM) plan as submitted. RESOLUTION NO. 2010-25 Page 3 7. Thirty units or twenty percent (20 %) of the project must contain affordable housing. How the affordable housing would-be accomplished would be determined at the time of Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. Adopted by the Edina City Council this _ day of _/2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2009-26 ON APPROVING A GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM QUASI- PUBLIC FO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR COLONIAL CHURCH AT 6200 COLONIAL WAY City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Water Senior Living on behalf of the Colonial Church additional development on their property at 6200 Colonial Way to build a 4- story, 150 -unit senior assisted living facility. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential/ commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. C. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. 952- 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 yyyyw.cityofedina.com d. Increase the appeal of Edina s housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure - capacity through wise land use. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the guide plan amendment for the following described property: Lot 1, Block 2, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota. Approval is subject to the following condition: a. Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan approval for a Senior Assisted Living Project. Adopted by the Edina City Council this Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk to day of , 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 12010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk MINUTE SUMMARY Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Tuesday, January 27, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Mike Fischer, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Ke vin Stau Schroeder, Steve Brown, Floyd Grabiel, Jeff Ciro rite' �, Arl@ Karwehn Kata / STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker The minutes of the November 24 II. NEW BUSINESS( 1 ` F 2010.0001 Colonial Ch.0 ,,- °-- -6200 Cotoeia League informed the Coi rtion of the Colonial Cl livinifacility. Plaq6r T,i the follow is required: ,meeting werd fi 11 Edina Michael submitted. ssion the proposal is to develop the vacant �h site with a 4 -story, 150 -unit senior ae explained that to accommodate the 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Resi ential. The High Density designation would allow the residential assist living use. 2. A Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5. The PRD -5 District only allows rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. 3. A Preliminary Development Plan. 4. Final Development Plan. 5. Subdivision to create a new lot for the senior housing development. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 2 of 14 Planner Teague said with regard to parking that the applicant has demonstrated that enough parking would be provided for both the existing Colonial Church and the senior convalescent home. For the church, the required parking spaces must be one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly. The maximum capacity of the sanctuary in the church is 800 people; therefore, 266 spaces are required. The site plan demonstrates 341 parking spaces available for the church. The north lot contains 222 spaces, the west lot 20 '$paces, and the east lot contains 99 spaces. The east lot wasfpreviously owned by Colonial Church, but dedicated to the City of Edina when the�church was built back in 1978. Colonial Church and the City entered into a `Parking loot Agreement" that allows the church to use the lot for their parking requirements.� For the housing component, the required parking is one space for ever'y'-four,' patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. Based on 194 residont'maximum,'45 employees, one vehicle and one bus, 95 spaces are required. The site plan shows that there would be 93 surface stalls and 90 enclbseq,stal,s. \, Planner Teague noted the access toithe sjte would 6e from two entrance /exits from Colonial Way. There would -be s iir ace parking in�front -of the building, with the loading area behind the bilding facing crosstown highway. A circular pick -up and drop off area would be located-in front of the building. Access to the underground garage would' be from the front of the building on the west side. The proposal would meet all minimum'drive -aisle widtfi standards. Continuing, Planner Teague stated the'city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them-16 _be_ ac-deptable �_ Planner Teague - reported that�o acconjmoflate the new building, 333 trees and shrubs woGld have to be�removed. Based on the perimeter of the site, the a0plican6s required to ha�(e 54 over story trees and a full compliment of under story shitubs. The applicant 'Is proposing an extensive landscape plan that includes 132tover story trees that' would remain, and planting back 207 over story trees\and 572 understory trees and shrubs. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide, Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Residential-,\ reliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5; Preliminary Development Plan; and Preliminary Plat for the Waters senior living development at 6200 Colonial Way. Approval is subject to the following findings: The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 3 of 14 2. The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed. project 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals o the; Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities anid,p diversity of,housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of,land designated for residential /commercial mixed use while complementing the character of existing development and 'promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives:, b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030:, C. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a -.wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and -offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This �road vision,of_community is a cornerstone to promoting, wor�foroe 'I. o/ that includes a wide range of housing prices anvd- options; based onthe principle that those who contribute to,the comJmurilty should have the opportunity to live here. Also,�this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes,the City an attractive destination for young fa . ilies. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new �i fesidentg-and retain current residents. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that f ee - people's preferences, and dircumstances at all stages of life. f. cknowledgethe interrelationship between land use and f transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation `'vinfrastructure- capacity through wise land use. A pray e� I allows\the applicp nt to proceed with Final Development Plan and Final f Rezoning�subjecf'to the - following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans date stamped December 29, 2009. 2. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 3. Final Park Dedication requirement would be determined at Final Development Plan approval. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 4 of 14 4. Final Development Plans must be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Plans may be revised per conditions of the Watershed District. 5. Final Development Plans shall comply with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated January 21, 2010; the building official's memo dated January 7, 2010; and the fire marshal's memo dated January 11, 2010. Appearing for the Applicant Jay Jensen, Waters Senior Living, Ted Yoch /and Jack, Ford;-Colonial'Church� Discussion ` Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague/the, reason t e rezoning request was to PRD -5. Planner Teague responded the PRD -5 zoning district is specifically for rest homes convalescent homes and nursing - homes. An assisted living facility falls into that category. i r Commissioner Carpenter asked Planner Teague if there are_other "rezoning options ". Planner Teague responded senior h'ousing`is permitted in all PRD zoning districts, MDD -4, 5 & 6 and, PC,9 /2oning districts; however, the services provided in this facility are uniOue. `Commissioner Carper ter asked if Planner Teague knew of any vacant parcels (other than redevelopment) where this project would work. Planriei� Teague responded Edirla]s almost completely developed and he doesn't believe'there are any vacant parcels available to accommodate a building of-this size \.Concluding, Planner Teague reported that in the City, oftdina there are two other sites with a PRD -5 zoning, adding both are located along Crosstown near - Xerxes Avenue. Corrimissioner Staunton,�questioned the reasoning behind staffs recommendation to require, 20 units of affordable housing in the project. Planner <teague responded that the City of Edina has established a goal to provide 212 units of affordable housing units by 2020. Planner Teague noted because Edina is almost completely developed there aren't many opportunities available to achieve the, established, goal. pevelopment and redevelopment is one opportunity thi�City has in achieving the goal.. Applicant Presentation./ Mr. Jensen addressed the Commission and explained their goal is to create a community with a foundation on "Residents First" and "Wellness ". Mr. Jensen said the Waters would be more than a building; it is the creation of a community. Continuing, Mr. Jensen said the average resident age is 86 years and most are women. The facility requires two meals per day to ensure overall wellness and to encourage residents (that are physically able) to get together. Mr. Jensen stated Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 5 of 14 one of the unique things about this concept is that services are brought to the residents. Mr. Jensen reported that at this time the proposed building has a waiting list and the majority of those on the list are Edina residents or live within three miles of the site. Mr. Jensen referred to trees and landscaping and reported the most common trees on the site are Box Elder; however, there are also a number of Oak trees and other trees along the pond that will be preserved. 'Mr. Jensen,' said with regard to landscaping the goal is to provide a buffer.. to Colonial Church and its neighbors, adding at this time the trees proposed for landscaping would be evergreen trees. Mr. Jensen also reported a water retention pond is proposed to capture rain water and would be located on the western portion of the site -. Continuing, Mr. Jensen said in the opinion of the development teamAhere is more than sufficient parking to meet the needs of both the church and the_._. proposed assisted living building. Mr. Jensen referrec to the Traffic Impact Study done for the project noting that the study concluded that the existing roadway is more than sufficient to handle the additional traffic that would be generated from this project. / With regard to energy Mr. Jensen reported the;buil4jng would_ be energy efficient using efficient lighting, sufficient insu, lation.and possibly geothermal heating and cooling. /�� ��� Continuing his presentation Mr. Jensen informed the Commission the church has held three neighborhood meetings. Concluding his presentation,Mr. Jensen explained the layout of the facility and invited Commission Members to view their other facilities; the closest the Colony at Eden Prairie. � �� �> Mr.'' ed Yock, 6224 b'raeburn Circle explained that church members after much discussion solicited a RFP,and received 13 proposals and the team selected The Waters,'-adding they were very impressed with their facility in Eden Prairie. Discussion Commissionei�Grabiel,4uesti6ned the restrictiveness of the requested zoning reclassification'especially iri light of the fact that the Gramercy isn't doing very well, pointing out there are other projects the City has approved that haven't been constructed and'all of those projects are "senior related ". Mr. Jensen responded there is a waiting list for this project, pointing out this project is rental, it isn't a co -op or a "for sale" product. Continuing, Mr. Jensen said a market analysis was done and it indicated a demand for this type of development. Concluding, Mr. Jensen stated the services provided for in this building are different and although the population it serves is senior it's a different beast. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 6 of 14 Commissioner Grabiel asked Mr. Jensen how he feels about the affordable housing recommendation. Mr. Jensen responded he would like to try to achieve 20% affordable units by working closely with the City. Mr. Jensen explained that the Waters already works closely with Hennepin County on housing subsidy funds and noted that the cost of living in the proposed facility is actually lower than the cost of living in a nursing home. Mr. Jensen added an elderly waiver program is also available to residents that meet certain guidelines. Commissioner Risser noted the reference to the - possibility of geothermal and asked Mr. Jensen how far along they are in the process of finding out if that is an option. Mr. Jensen responded their findings are about two weeks out: Commissioner Risser questioned if solar energy was,considered, Mr. Jensen responded they haven't looked into that but are, hopeful geothermal'is an option. Commissioner Staunton questioned how lighting.was addressed. Mr. Jensen responded that all exterior lighting would be directed down. With` regard to the building itself, Mr. Jensen said that after 9,:30 pm,the majoeity of units,are dark, except for the public areas. He also added that soft lighting would be incorporated in the cupola, reiterating that all external Bights (parking lot, etc) would be directed down. Commissioner Schroeder said he reviewed the landscaping plans and pointed out a number of Oak tress would be lost and the,replacement strategy is mostly focused on evergreen trees, riot Oaks. Continuing, Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the church efso consider talking with MNDOT about implementing a joint plan on tree replacement in and near the right -of -way. Mr. Jensen responded he would be happy to check with MNDOT regarding the sites boundary with MNDOTF addingAt was his�suggestion to plant evergreen trees. Mr. Jensen explained that -he thought evergreen trees would screen the highway better,#rom both visual and noise pollution.; Commissioner Schroeder said he also'noted /on the plans,�hat the,path from/the bridge doesn't connect to the front door, it,abruptly stops. Commissioner Schroeder said in his opinion the bridge is iconic and, "users" of the bridge should be directed somewhere. Chair Fischer said, he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder's comment on the bridge, he said in his�opinion there appears to be a disconnect in this area. Mr. Jensen responded that he' would,look;hto that. Commissioner said- he appreciates that attention was made to the lighting, adding he lives up the hill from Christ Presbyterian Church and lighting can be an issue. Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 7 of 14 Public Comment Robert Scroggins, 6256 Sandpiper Court, addressed the Commission and stated he lives in the multi - family development directly west and adjacent to the subject property, adding he has worked with and has the highest respect for Mr. Jensen. Continuing, Mr. Scroggins said he believes the City's Park & Recreation Department is considering reconfiguring Country Side Park, and. if that's the case; Colonial should get together with the City to discuss and work together on any changes. Mr. Scroggins reported that where'he lives lighting from the church hasn't been a problem. Concluding, Mr. Scrogginsstated the City'should stay firm on their recommendation that the project provides; affordable housing if approved. Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff Place told the Commission he has a number of, he would like to share with them, adding they afe�not,-pro or con. 1. vacancies already exist in a number of assisted.living.facilities ;, 2. the building as proposed is "out of sync" with the character of -the neighborhood (too tall); 3. the proposed assisted living facility, is a for - profit venture. It may be better if it were non - profit; 4. the proposed location for,the assisted %livin'g facility is- close to a City park where children play etc; 5. if approved the churchIs "giving up" the south parking lot; should a Proof of Parking Agreemek be required especially when the church has contiguous events(there is "overflow. Concluding, Mr. Johnson said he would like the Planning Commission to table this issued Mr. Johnson said there -still are a.number of issues that need to be addressed; adding sewer capacity and,the,aquifer are also issues that should be addeessed'to ensure they haveAhe capacity to handle the proposed development. Mr. Johnson also'questioned the size of the building and asked the applicant to consider a smaller facility. The facility as proposed is just too large,. Dorothy Krezner, 5 J 928 ff Place, addressed the Commission and informed them she is very concerned with light spillage and traffic. Josephine Braun, 5833 Jeff Place, acknowledged that Colonial Church has been a good neighbor and expressed the following concerns: 1. construction impact on the water level, noting this area has a high water table. 2. removal of trees 3. traffic Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 8 of 14 William Rodgers, 6100 Arbor Lane, told the Commission traffic is really a concern on Tracy Avenue. He pointed out that today the majority of kids drive their own cars to school and adding school buses to the mix creates congestion. Concluding, Mr. Rodgers questioned if a sound wall is planned if the assisted living facility is constructed.. Chair Fischer asked if anyone else would care to speak to.the issue; being none; Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion./'All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Discussion and Questions > i Chair Fischer noted that it appears from comments from the neigh bors'that- the majority of their concern is traffic. Commissioner,Schroeder noted that the applicant provided a traffic analysis and it appears'to him based \on that analysis. that conflict from this project if any is minimal during the pok times` - -, Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Jensen if,the-propos6d facility ha's shift changes. Mr. Jensen responded that thislacility doesn't have shift changes, adding its "manned" 24 hours a day.; Mr. Jensen,also,asked the Commission to note that the facility is located near a'trahsit lineiwhich, would enable employees the option of using mass transif. Commissioner Brown asked \Mr. Jensen the \ "parking demand" patterns for employees and visitors, adding parking is a concern. Mr. Jensen responded that there are between 40-45 employees-during the peak time 9 am -6 pm. The majority of-visitors come between 6 pm \and 8:30 pm M -F plus weekend days. He sai there aren't a lot otmorning visitors_ Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Jensen if the-employee parking would,be u.hder the building. Mr. Jensen respondedin the affirmative. hair Fischer noted Mr. JohP son l''suggested the possibility of implementing a Proof of Parking Agreement to ensure adequate parking and asked Mr. Jensen if he knows of a good place to "designate" that parking. Mr. Jensen responded that there areareas m the lowe/ r level parking garage earmarked for storage and from experience he has found that residents that don't have vehicles allow their children to use their stalls�o store boats and other miscellaneous items. Concluding, Mr. Jensen said if the storage items were eliminated it would free -up roughly 30 -35 spaces'-if � the need arises. Mr. Jensen stated that maintaining adequate parking in partnership with Colonial Church is very important, and any parking issues would be worked out. Commissioner Staunton pointed out that parking for the project as proposed satisfies all ordinance requirements questioning if the City can recommend a Proof of Parking Agreement when parking for the proposed facility meets /or Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 9 of 14 exceeds the ordinance. Commissioner Brown commented that it may be possible the ordinance requirements don't meet the demand. He said from experiences with Christ Presbyterian that when contiguous events occur parking can spill into a neighborhood. Chair Fischer noted another item that was mentioned as a concern was the water table and the aquifer. Chair Fischer asked Mr. Jensenif he would look into these issues. Mr. Jensen responded he would, adding the project requires a permit from the Watershed District and those concerns, would be raised: Mr. Jensen added they will also know more when they receive,the results from drilling for geothermal fuels. ; Commissioner Forrest questioned the size of the buildin and the reasoning behind the number of units. Mr. Jensen explained that to operate a successful facility and meet the needs of the residents certain staffing /resident ratios need to be met. A discussion ensued regarding the date /6f the traff&-study since it appears the data was collected during the su mmer'months -(Aug usiYwhen school was out of session. It was recommended that a-"new,iraffic study be conducted to ensure that all "information" regarding traffic' is implemented into the report. During the discussion it was brought up that -there is'the`op�ion of)tabling the hearing until the traffic study is updated and /or refer the proposal, back to the Transportation Commission for their review v' Ith the new data. Commissioners concluded that although the data submitted`wasn't done when ;school /was in session the traffic generated from this particular development probably won't have a large impact on what is happening on Tracy Avenue and the Crosstown. It was also suggested -that the neighborhood contact the City and express to the Traffic Safety Coordinator their concerns -%A lh traffic on Tracy and the Crosstown entrance /exits ; commissioner Grabiel said if he` understands the process correctly that this b/ aring is,the first step of a'two step process. Continuing, Commissioner Grabiel asked if the request for a G ide Plan change is also two steps. Planner Teague responded that the Guide ''an change is a one step process requiring a 4/5 vote at the Council leveh., Planner Teague said Commissioner Grabiel is also correct that two steps are required for/the rezoning, subdivision and development plan; adding this evening the Commission is in the preliminary stages of those approvals (if approved). ,,Chair Fischer suggested that the motions be separated; first, the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and second; preliminary rezoning, subdivision and final development plan. Commissioners agreed that separating the requests makes sense. Commissioner Staunton said his understanding was if the Commission and Council don't approve a Guide Plan change the project can't advance. Planner Teague responded that is correct. Continuing, Commissioner Staunton. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 10 of 14 questioned the inconsistency in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague said the inconsistency isn't in the plan; it's with the land use map. Planner Teague explained that the land use map is based on existing land use(s). Commissioner Brown said that while he believes the proposed location for the assisted living facility within the Colonial Church campus is good he is worried about the scope of the proposal and its impact on the neighborhood, adding he is struggling with this request. Commission Action Commissioner Brown moved to recommend appr6val;6f the,,, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi- Public to High/ Density Residential. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion: All' voted aye; motion carried.�� Commissioner Scherer moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, single - Dwelling Unit District to PFD -5, Planned Residential, District; Preliminary Development Plan and Oreliminary Pla &approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions; including; • The traffic study submitted by t6 applicant needs to be recalculated to reflect traffic when ,/school is open. ! 1 • The assisted living,facility is to contain 20% or 30 affordable housing units; and ` • Implement Traffib\Deman`d,Management Plan (TMD) strategies 7 B. Commissioner. Grabiel�seconded the motion. Commissioner Grabill said irr his opinion tj�is sounds like a good project; however „Fie does have \concerns about its viability because of the present economy; however that isn't the purview of the Commission. Commissioner 'Crabiel added he also has concern with the City requiring affordable housing, when it isn't'required by ordinance; but all -in -all, in his opinion it's an interesting and a'good sound, project;' Commissioner,,Brown stated, fie shares Commissioner Grabiels concern over the viability of the project. Commissioner Brown reiterated he worries about the scope of the project;,sdding he questions how this project will coexist with the surrounding diverse land uses. Commissioner Staunton stated in his opinion this is a good project that satisfies many of the goals established in the Comprehensive Plan. Continuing, Commissioner Staunton said rezoning the property to PRD -5 makes sense because it's the only district that would allow this type of facility. Commissioner Staunton pointed out that building height is established by setbacks and this February 11, 2010 City of Edina Mr. Steve Manhart RLK Incorporated 6110 Blue Circle Drive Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 RE: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Traffic Impact Analysis - Addendum Dear Mr. Manhart, Thank you for submitting the addendum to the traffic impact analysis (dated February 10, 2010) to the City regarding the recounting and analysis of the turn movements during the school year at the three intersections near the project site. Staff and the City's traffic consultant Chuck Rickart of WSB and Associates have reviewed the addendum and conclude that all studied intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. We agree that the proposed development does not significantly affect the operations or congestion of the adjacent roadway and intersections. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952 - 826 -0445 or at jsullivanCa)_ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Enclosed: Traffic Impact Analysis —Addendum Feb. 10, 2010 C: Jay Jenson - Shelter Corporation Vern Swing — RLK Incorporated Wayne Houle — City of Edina Cary Teague — City of Edina Chuck Rickart — WSB and Associates GAEngineering \General \C Streets\6200 Colonial Waffraffic Review\20100211 City Response Addendum.doc 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET WWW.cii ofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 Y P446� Engineering - Landscape Architecture - Planning - Surveying - Traffic INCORPORATED Creating extraordinary Communities MEMORANDUM TO: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer COPY: Jay Jensen, Shelter Corporation FROM: Steve Manhart, P.E., PTOE, PTP Vern Swing, P.E. DATE: February 10, 2010 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis - Addendum The Colony of Edina RLK Project No. 2009 -087 -L whoule@ci. edina. mn. us jsu11ivan@ci.edina.mn.us jay@sheltercorp.com smanhart @rlkinc.com vswing@rlkinc.com Per the City's request, an Addendum has been prepared for the Traffic Impact Analysis for The Colony of Edina. Concern was raised by the Edina Planning Commission that the traffic counts reflected in the Traffic Impact Analysis may not have included the impacts of school traffic on the street system. In fact, the counts presented in the original analysis were taken in June, 2009. In response, AM and PM traffic turning movements were recounted in the area during the first week of February, 2010. These new peak hour directional counts were utilized to reassess the impacts of the development's trip generation with the added impact of school traffic. The attached figures illustrated the updated turning movement counts in the area. In general, Existing Conditions Analysis Section V of the original Traffic Impact Analysis reported the Results of the Operational Analysis. This section contained the results of the intersection operational analyses for the existing conditions. Updated Tables 4a and 4b below show the results of the Existing Conditions Analysis. Table 4a -- UPDATED Recnitc of RxistinLy Conditions Analvsis — AM Peak Hour (Feb. 20 10) Intersection Level of Service 95'h Percentile Queues2, Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way AB (EBR) Adequate queue lengths. NBL/T queue of 35'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard BB SBT - Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A L Adequate queue lengths. 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement LOS reported from SimTratfic. 2. 95'" percentile queues reported from SimTraffic Offices: Duluth - Ham Lake - Hibbing - Minnetonka • Oakdale (952) 933-0972 - 6110 Blue Circle Drive - Suite 100 - Minnetonka, MN 55343 - FAX(952)933-1153 Equal Opportunihj Employer Table 4b -- UPDATED Results of Existing Conditions Anal sis — PM Peak Hour (Feb. 2010 In comparison with conditions described in the original report, operations of the Existing roadway network remain acceptable. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS are B or better, and all 95th percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. As with the original report, the interactions between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection were investigated to determine whether any traffic problems exist. These two intersections are only 400 feet apart. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 95`h percentile queues of 35 feet in the AM peak hour (up slightly from 33 feet in the original report) and 36 feet in the PM peak hour (down from 44 feet in the original report). No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. In summary, differences in findings between the original traffic analysis and this addendum are nominal. No improvements are recommended for the Existing Conditions. Build Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the Build conditions. Tables 5a and 5b show the results of the Build conditions analysis. Table 5a — (UPDATED) D.— I+. ^-FR,,;lfI rnnA;tinns Annlvsic — AM Peak Hour (Feb 2010) Intersection Level of Service 95`h Percentile Queuee* Intersection Level of 95`h Percentile Queues Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard Service Adequate queue lengths. Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way AB Z Ade uate ueue len ths. NBL/T ueue of 36'. Trac Avenue & Olinger Boulevard BB Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A L Adequate queue lengths. In comparison with conditions described in the original report, operations of the Existing roadway network remain acceptable. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS are B or better, and all 95th percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. As with the original report, the interactions between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection were investigated to determine whether any traffic problems exist. These two intersections are only 400 feet apart. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 95`h percentile queues of 35 feet in the AM peak hour (up slightly from 33 feet in the original report) and 36 feet in the PM peak hour (down from 44 feet in the original report). No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. In summary, differences in findings between the original traffic analysis and this addendum are nominal. No improvements are recommended for the Existing Conditions. Build Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the Build conditions. Tables 5a and 5b show the results of the Build conditions analysis. Table 5a — (UPDATED) D.— I+. ^-FR,,;lfI rnnA;tinns Annlvsic — AM Peak Hour (Feb 2010) Intersection Level of Service 95`h Percentile Queuee* Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way AB (EBL) Adequate queue lengths. NBLfF queue of 34'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard BB (SBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A L Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & West Access A/A L Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & East Access A/A L Adequate queue lengths. 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement IDS reported from aim iramc. 2. 95'° percentile queues reported from SimTrafiic RLK Incorporated Page 2 of 3 February 10, 2010 The Colony of Edina 2009 -087 -M Table 5b — (UPDATED) Results of Build Conditions Analysis — PM Peak Hour (Feb 2010) Intersection Level of Service 95th Percentile Queues Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way AB (EBL) Adequate queue, lengths. NBL /T queue of 44'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard BB (NBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & West Access A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & East Access A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. As with the original report, analysis of the Build Conditions indicate acceptable operations will remain on the roadway network and proposed site accesses. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS is B or better and all 95"' percentile queues will be accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 95`h percentile queues of 34 feet in the AM peak hour (down. from 44 feet in the original report), and 44 feet in the PM peak hour (down from 53 feet in the original report). No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. As was stated in the original report, if northbound left turn operational and queuing problems arise in the future due to growth in background traffic, it is recommended that this portion of Tracy Avenue be re- striped by the City to provide a dedicated northbound left turn lane onto Colonial Way. In summary, differences in findings between the original traffic analysis and this addendum are nominal. No mitigation measures are recommended for the Build Conditions. Summary of Findings An update of the turning movement counts in the area indicates minor changes in directional volumes in the AM and PM Peak Hours. When .levels of service are calculated, overall intersection and worst movement LOS remain at B or better, and all 95th percentile, queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. Therefore, because the findings in this Addendum indicate minimal differences from the original Traffic Impact Analysis, the. conclusions and recommendations from the original study remain intact. Furthermore, there are no changes to the Traffic Demand Management Plan as presented in the original report. GAShelter Corporition\2009- 087 -Lk_Correspondence \Traffic\Re ponce to City Comments 02- 05- 10.doc RLK Incorporated Page 3 of 3 February 10, 2010 The Colony of Edina 2009 -087 -M 2009 RL f .r 417-44 77 M � N 1 76 78 1 2 O ■ aI N Duluth, 1,& F � Ham lake k4v HHilanK, MN N I T K MlnOakd ka, Nf ter, hn� ep Ph—: 95293300 O V Pax: 952 9331153 d vraa.rlk�ncmm L� 6110 Blue Cirde Drive • Suite 100 • \fmna nl-, MT 55343 OLINGER BL a `C LEGENL AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX ROADWAY LANES �' 4 STOP CONTROL c x t as 18 45 °S 19 41 ♦ o 5 4 ° 14 Y° r. 18 15 ♦RTi N M 19 22 3 4 8 8 .4 5 12 1 *: ° o A br1' 74 88 /Np� t. PROJECT SITE THE COLONY OF EDINA BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UPDATED) s W.iftmlo# 0 200 �•i SCALE IN FEET Figure / 5 -A Project�� 2009087L c a f i.0 i V i f i F t i i i 1 .4 • t 44 77 aIa 0 M N %8 %8 ' rya < _ OD 1 2 r i M N M 5 12 0 74 68 r,,ar � � 1 i � r a' i i v m n 7 Dulmh h4V o �� fluu l.Ike, hfAi Hblvo�+, fitly N Mione , MN MN RIB nd.L vkdale, h04 ep wcoxivxn'c r.o Phme:9529330M O V Par 952 93.31153 � o�var.rlkioc.uxn li 6110 Blue -' '- Drive • Suiu 1 o0 • \finnnonk■, AfN 55343 �h a , ■ THE COLONY OF EDINA 2010 EXISTING VOLUMES & GEOMETRICS Project 2009087L w9t��l� o e S�2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 27, 2010 2010- 001.10a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Development of the vacant wooded portion of the Colonial Church site, located at 6200 Colonial Way, with a 4 -story, 150 -unit senior assisted living facility. (See project location on pages A1—A2; and the applicant narrative and detailed plans on pages A3 —A15.) To accommodate the request, the following is required: A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Residential. The High Density designation would allow the residential assisted living use. 2. A Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5. The PRD -5 District only allows rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. 3. A Preliminary Development Plan. 4. Final Development Plan. 5. Subdivision to create a new lot for the senior housing development. In order to obtain the above - mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step process. That process is as follows: Step One. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary _Development Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Preliminary Rezoning. Because Comprehensive Plan approval is necessary, this application requires a four -fifths vote of the City Council. Step Two. Final Development Plan, Final Plat and Final Rezoning. The Final Development Plan process is generally the same as the Preliminary Development Plan. However, a three -fifths favorable vote of the City Council is required. The applicant is requesting Step One of the process. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Countryside Park; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided Public /Semi - Public. Easterly: Edina Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided Low - Density Residential. Southerly: Crosstown Highway. Westerly: Nine -mile Village Townhomes; zoned and guided medium density housing. Existing Site Features The subject property is 6.27 acres in size contains a parking lot for the Colonial Church and has many mature trees. (See pages A2, A25 and A49— A56. ) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Parking Quasi - Public R -1, Single- Dwelling District The applicant has demonstrated that enough parking would be provided for both the existing Colonial Church and the senior convalescent home. For the church, the required parking spaces must be one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly. The maximum capacity of the sanctuary in the church is 800 people; therefore, 266 spaces are required. The site plan demonstrates 341 parking spaces available for the church. (See page A27.) The north lot contains 222 spaces, the west lot 20 spaces, and the east lot contains 99 spaces. The east lot was previously owned by Colonial Church, but dedicated to the City of Edina when the church was built back in 1978. Colonial Church and the City entered into a "Parking Lot Agreement" that allows the church to use the lot for their parking requirements. 2 For the housing component, the required parking is one space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. Based on 194 resident maximum, 45 employees, one vehicle and one bus, 95 spaces are required. The site plan shows that there would be 93 surface stalls and 90 enclosed stalls. Site Circulation Access to the site would be from two entrance /exits from Colonial Way. There would be surface parking in front of the building, with the loading area behind the building facing crosstown highway. A circular pick -up and drop off area would be located in front of the building. Access to the underground garage would be from the front of the building on the west side. (See page A24.) The proposal would meet all minimum drive -aisle width standards. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A48. A more detailed review would be done as part of the Final Development Plan review. Landscaping To accommodate the new building, 333 trees and shrubs would have to be removed. (See attached tree inventory and removal plan on pages A28 —A31.) Base on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 54 over story trees and a full compliment of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing an extensive landscape plan that includes 132 over story trees that would remain, and planting back 207 over story trees and 572 understory trees and shrubs. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A48. A more detailed review would be done as part of the Final Development Plan review. Building /Building Material The new building would be designed to fit in, or match with the Colonial Church campus. The new building would be made of cement board siding and asphalt shingles. (See renderings and building elevations on pages A18— A23.) Even though the proposal is for a preliminary development plan, the 3 applicant will have a materials board for the Planning Commission to review at the meeting. The fire department reviewed the proposed plans and offered the following comments: • Install fire hydrant at the main entrance to the site. Final location to be approved during plan review meetings. • Install fire hydrant near the southwest corner of the building. Location to be approved during plan review meetings. • Install a fire apparatus access road along the west and south sides of the building. Increasing the width to 10 feet for the proposed 6 -foot wide sidewalk along the west and south sides of the property would meet this requirement. The sidewalk to be engineered to support the weight of fire apparatus. (See memo from the fire marshal on page A46.) The City's chief building official also reviewed the proposed plan and offered comments. (See page A47.) These comments from both the fire marshal and building official shall be made conditions of any approval. Park Dedication Per Minnesota State Statute 462.353, Subd. 4(a) and Section 810.13 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate land for public use as parks, playgrounds, recreation facilities, trails, or public open space. Per Section 810.13. Subd. 5-of the City Code, the fees in lieu of land dedication is $5,000 per dwelling unit to satisfy the City's park dedication requirement. The City's park director recommends that a 10 -foot trail easement be dedicated along the south side of Olinger Boulevard for a possible future regional trail. (See pages A42 —A43.) The total park dedication cost would be $750,000 with no land dedication. The value of the 10 -foot trail easement would be taken from the $750,000 dedication amount. The fee would be paid prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars or subdivision approval for recording with Hennepin County. The exception is that in the case of multiple - family residential developments where the site plan review occurs after the time of final plat approval, the fee would be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. E Density From a unit count perspective, the proposed density of 24.5 units per acre would be a higher density than the adjacent Nine -Mile Village (11 units /acre) to the west. However, the proposed use and zoning would be for a senior assisted living facility only, which would not generate the amount of traffic than would be generated from a true high density market rate housing facility. Access to the facility would be off Tracy Avenue, and Olinger Boulevard, both of which are defined as collector roadways. (See functional classification map on page A44.) Affordable Housing The applicant has indicated a willingness to provide 20% of the dwelling units as affordable housing. (See applicant narrative on page A14.) That option can be discussed as part of the preliminary approvals of this project; if that is something that the City of Edina is interested in, the specifics could be worked out as part of the final approval process. Preliminary Plat The applicant is also requesting a re -plat of the lot to create a separate lot for the senior housing facility. (See the plat on page A26.) The subdivision would meet all minimum lot standards and subdivision requirements. Compliance Table City Standard (PRD -5) Proposed Building Setbacks - Front — Highway 62 49 feet 51 + feet 35 feet (two -story portion) 39 feet Front — Colonial Way 49 feet 70 feet Side — West 49 feet 143 feet Side — East 49 feet 79 feet Parking Lot Setbacks Front 20 20 feet Side — East 10 50+ feet Side — West 10 115 feet Proximity to R -1 District 170 feet 344 feet Building Height No maximum requirement. 49 feet Building Coverage 35% 23% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 120% 92% Parking Stalls Church Spaces equal in number to one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly (Max. Capacity is 800 people = 266 spaces required) 341 spaces Senior Housing One space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management (194 residents, 45 employees, one vehicle, one bus = 95 spaces required.) 183 spaces total (90 enclosed and 93 surface) Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 9'x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Landscaping 54 over story trees and a full 132 over story trees would remain & compliment of under story shrubs. 207 over story trees planted. 572 understory trees and shrubs. PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. The use would be compatible with the higher density residential use to the west, Countryside Park to the north, Crosstown Highway to the south, and the fire station to the east. (See land uses on pages A2 and A17.)The park, church, and fire station would buffer the proposed use from the nearest single - family homes. The closest single - family home would be 344 feet away. (See page A45.) Access to the facility would be off Tracy Avenue, and Olinger Boulevard, both of which are defined as collector roadways. (See functional classification map on page A44.) Access to the site would not be through any local streets. This site would be advantages for the residents of this facility because of the emergency services offered from the fire station next door. 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. c. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. 7 e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure - capacity through wise land use. The proposed housing fits Edina's demographics. According to the 2000 census, 22.7% of Edina's population is age 65 or older. Many of these residents continue to live in single - family homes. The proposed housing development would offer an opportunity for these residents to move out of their single - family home and remain in Edina, resulting in an opportunity for a young family to move into the vacated single - family residential home. 3. The existing roadways would support the project. RLK Incorporated conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both RLK and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic studies on pages A57 —A84.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on January 21, 2010, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See the draft minutes on pages A87 —A88.) 4. If affordable housing is included within the project, the units could help the city to achieve its established goal with the Met Council of providing 212 additional affordable housing units by the year 2030. Is the PRD -5 Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PRD -5 is appropriate for the site. This district is exclusive for rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. These uses would be appropriate for this site given the surrounding land uses, including the Nine Mile Village townhomes to the west, Countryside Park to the north, Crosstown Highway to the south, and the fire station to the east. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Residential; Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5; Preliminary Development Plan; and Preliminary Plat for the Waters senior living development at 6200 Colonial Way. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. c. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure- capacity through wise land use. Z Approval allows the applicant to proceed with Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, subject to the following Conditions: The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans date stamped December 29, 2009. 2. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 3. Final Park Dedication requirement would be determined at Final Development Plan approval. 4 Final Development Plans must be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Plans may be revised per conditions of the Watershed District. 5. Final Development Plans shall comply with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated January 21, 2010; the building official's memo dated January 7, 2010; and the fire marshal's memo dated January 11, 2010. Deadline for a city decision: April 20, 2010 10 THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING" December 28, 2009 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Proposed Senior Housing Community on the campus of Colonial Church Subject: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Dear Cary, From the time Colonial Church originally purchased the land over thirty years ago, it was always intended by Colonial Church to develop the balance of the land with a complementary use. Three years ago the Colonial Church of Edina began the process to develop this portion of their campus into a compatible and complementary use. Colonial Church issued a request for proposals and received over twenty responses. Last spring Colonial Church selected The Waters Senior Living to be their partner in developing a 150 unit senior housing community. Since last spring we have been working to craft the finest senior living community in Edina. This letter and the attached exhibits describe this exciting opportunity. To make this exciting senior housing development a reality, we are requesting the following actions by the City of Edina: • Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Amend the Land Use Plan to change the land from Institutional to Multifamily. • Consider rezoning the land The land is currently zoned Single Family Residential. The senior housing development requires a Planned Residence District 5 which is entitled "PRD -5 Rest Homes,. Convalescent Homes and Nursing Homes. A3 • Consider the Preliminary Development Plan Application This application reviews the details of our proposed senior housing development. • Consider the Subdivision Application This application would split off a 6.1 acre parcel of land from the Colonial Church owned land as the parcel for this development • Consider 20% of the senior housing to be affordable housing We understand that the City of Edina has affordable housing goals to meet. We are open to incorporate 20% of the proposed housing units to be affordable housing, 30 units, as was accomplished in Eden Prairie and Minneapolis in a similar senior housing developments. Before presenting the reasons to approve our requests we describe in, the following four sections the Development Philosophy, Being a Good Neighbor, the Development Description and the Development Team for The Waters Senior Living of Edina. DEVELOPMENT PHILSOPHY The Waters Senior Living of Edina is much more than a building, it is the creation of a community. The foundation of this new senior community is based upon two critical features: Resident First and Wellness. Building upon the success of The Colony at Eden Prairie, The `Maters Senior Living will work with the Colonial Church to create The Waters Senior Living of Edina, an upscale senior housing community. The entire building will be licensed as housing with services so seniors can age in place with recreational, spiritual and assistance with activities of daily living brought to their home as the services are needed. This is unique because it orients the operation and focus to the senior resident by bringing services to them instead of requiring them to move. Most senior housing requires residents to move between buildings on a campus to access increased services. We eliminate the hardship a resident may have to endure with multiple moves. Wellness means incorporating a variety of wellness oriented features in the building, and weaving wellness into the fabric of all of the operations of the senior community. Wellness programs focus on the six dimensions of 2 Wellness: physical, spiritual, social, emotional, intellectual and vocational. Incorporated into the operations is on site 24 hour nursing availability to provide residents with needed medical assistance on a personalized basis. On the first floor of The Waters Senior Living of Edina there is a wellness room, walking track, exercise area, warm water therapy pool and a chapel. Leading our wellness efforts is Pastor David Holm, the former pastor of Normandale Lutheran Church. The wellness programs will be supplemented by a close relationship with Colonial Church who will provide volunteers to the senior community for daily activities, field trips and spirituality. BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR be an integral art of the Colonial The Waters Senior Living gr P Church campus. This requires that the proposed senior housing also be a good neighbor like Colonial Church has been over the past thirty years. Being a good neighbor manifests itself in the following ways: • The senior housing will not only create a new housing opportunity for current Edina seniors but will also free up their existing single family home for new families with children. This home recycling process helps keep Edina a vibrant community. • The exterior design complements the existing Colonial Church campus with lap siding, similar architectural features and a cupola. • The trees along the pond and Colonial Way will be preserved providing a green buffer to Colonial Church and its neighbors. The landscape plan plants many more trees, especially evergreen trees. • A water retention pond to capture rain water will be constructed on the western portion of the site. • There is more than sufficient parking to meet the needs of the senior housing and of Colonial Church. The senior housing generates little traffic and the Traffic Impact Study concluded that the existing roadway network is more than sufficient to handle the additional traffic. • The building will be energy efficient using efficient lighting, sufficient insulation and possibly geothermal heating and cooling (we are exploring its feasibility). • We have communicated with our neighbors about the proposed development. There have been three meetings with Colonial Church members, a neighborhood mailing and a neighborhood meeting. 4�- k, THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Building upon the success of The Colony at Eden Prairie, The Waters Senior Living of Edina will be the premier senior housing option in the Twin Cities metropolitan area by offering a range of residence options as well as a full spectrum of health and personal care services that will support older adults as they age. Our goal is to afford residents as much independence and privacy as possible while creating common spaces where individuals can gather, socialize and pursue hobbies and other interests. The design of the building, as seen on the site plan (Exhibit 2), has the front of the building facing the church. The front of the building will feature a colonial design with a large fountain in the circle in the front drop -off area. The exterior finishes will be designed to complement the existing Colonial Church campus., There will be extensive exterior landscaping including walking trails, fountains, a waterfall and gathering areas. The building's height is approximately 47 feet; however, the height varies with portions of the southern side being 15 feet high. In addition, the land will be regraded with the building basically being built on the current elevation of the existing parking lot. This results in approximately 10 feet lower elevation at the south -east corner resulting in a net building height of 35 feet. The building's footprint is approximately 56,000 square feet comprising approximately 20 % of the 6.1 acre parcel. The other hard surface areas (parking and sidewalks) are approximately 75,000 square feet comprising approximately 28% of the senior housing parcel. The Waters Senior Living of Edina will be comprised of 150 apartments with a significant amount of common space. The apartment composition is as follows: Unit Type Quantity Approximate Size One Bedroom 51 850 square feet One Bedroom plus den 22 1000 square feet Two Bedroom 24 1200 square feet Two Bedroom plus den 10 1300 square feet Three Bedroom 5 1500 square feet Memory Support 28 600 square feet Care Suites 10 600 square feet 46 rd The apartments will offer the following features: • Upscale finishes, 9 -foot ceilings, upgraded carpet, upgraded kitchen appliances, and upgraded kitchen cabinets. Some units will have granite counter tops and other upgrades. • Screened in balconies on most apartments • Two and three bedroom apartments having two full-sized bathrooms • Walk -in closets off the master bedrooms and in unit storage • High speed internet available • Smoke detector and sprinkler system in each apartment • Individually controlled heating and air conditioning • 24 -hour monitored security system with controlled access entry and pendant system The common areas will include the following features: • First floor Wellness related areas: • Warm water therapy pool and locker room • Wellness room • Walking track • Exercise area • Chapel / Community Room • First floor community areas • Bistro / Library / general store with attached screened porch • Living room • Parlor with a water wall • Billiards room • Concierge and administrative staff • Second Floor community areas • Two resident dining rooms and a commercial kitchen A-7 5 • Two private family dining rooms • Cinema / Community Room • Crafts room • Game room • Parlor • Memory Support neighborhoods (two fourteen unit secured neighborhoods) • Activity / Community areas • Dining room • Quiet room • Spa area • Accessibility to an outside secured court with walking paths and covered resting areas • Care Suite neighborhood (ten unit secured neighborhood for seniors who need a higher level of care) • Activity / Community areas • Dining room • Spa area Parking & Traffic There will be more than adequate parking. There will be 100 parking spaces in the underground garage and 85 surface spaces. Our experience with over thirty senior housing communities has proven that a small percentage of the senior residents will have cars. To provide the senior residents with transportation there will be a van and a limousine. At any given time the majority of our 30 to 40 employees will arrive in a vehicle. Assuming 10 to 20 visitors at the site at any time, the total amount of parking to be used is less than 50% of the available amount of parking. Colonial Church can use up to 80 surface parking spaces during their peak periods around Christmas and Easter. Colonial Church meets their parking requirements using their existing two parking lots adjacent to the church. The additional 80 spaces are intended for peak demand periods. Even at peak Al 6 demand periods, there will be sufficient parking for both Colonial Church and the senior housing. RLK Incorporated completed a Traffic Impact Analysis consistent with the City of Edina requirements (see a copy in Exhibit B). The analysis concluded: • The proposed development will generate 32 weekday AM peak hour trips and 55 weekday PM peak hour trips. • The existing roadway network is predicted to easily handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed senior housing development. THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM A development is only as strong as the development team. Our development team has a long term, proven track record demonstrating the ability to carry a development from dream to reality. Our team consists of the following members: • The Developer, Manager and majority owner is The Waters Senior Living, comprised of Shelter Corporation and Tealwood Care Centers (see resumes in Exhibit E) . • Colonial Church of Edina is a minority owner and provides volunteers who will enhance the quality of life for the seniors. • The General Contractor will be Frana & Companies, one of the largest and most successful apartment contractors in Minnesota. • The architect, HGA, has acted as lead consultants, architects, planners and engineers for a number of mixed -use projects. HGA also designed the Colonial Church. • The Counsel will be Frank Bennett of Lindquist & Vennum. Our team provides the following experience: • Along tradition of over twenty years in creating, managing and preserving senior housing. • Significant new construction development experience: over 5,000 apartment units totaling approximately $600 million in development cost, the development of 8 senior assisted communities and, over $1 billion of construction experience. 7 • Extensive public / private partnership experience in working with non- profit corporations and in partnership with Minnesota HRAs and CDAs. • Significant property management experience including currently managing over 7,000 rental- housing units and seventeen assisted living communities that provides beneficial experience in the design and development of senior housing. • Shelter Corporation principals have financed over $1 billion of development with tax - exempt financing constituting the first mortgage through Housing Revenue Bonds. • Extensive experience with tax increment financing around Minnesota. Recent examples of housing projects using TIF are as follows: • Parker Village in Robbinsdale — redevelopment district • Red Oak Preserve in Oakdale — redevelopment district • Joseph's Pointe in St Paul — redevelopment district • Cedar Villas in Eagan — housing district • The Colony in Eden Prairie — housing district • Douglas Trail in Rochester — housing district Projects under development: • Nokomis Assisted Living in Minneapolis Nokomis Assisted Living is a 77 -unit assisted living development located in Minneapolis. The development has received zoning approval and conceptual approval for tax increment financing, housing subsidy funds and a tax- exempt bond allocation. We expect the development to begin construction next spring. A rendering of the building is enclosed as Exhibit 4. Projects completed: • The Colony at Eden Prairie The Colony at Eden Prairie is 142 units of senior independent, assisted living and memory support. It was developed and is managed by The Waters Senior Living. Twenty percent of the units are occupied by low and moderate income seniors. It also includes a 25 -unit transcare center for physical therapy. This development received tax- exempt revenue bonds and tax increment assistance. Asti • Joseph's Pointe at Upper Landing in Saint Paul Joseph's Pointe is a 90 -unit tax credit development on the Mississippi River, part of Saint Paul's Upper Landing redevelopment. Joseph's Pointe was designed to fit in with immediately adjacent luxury housing even though it is work force housing. This development demonstrates our commitment to design a building to fit in with adjacent buildings. This development received tax credits, tax- exempt housing revenue bonds, tax increment assistance and MHFA funds. • Cedar Villas in Eagan Cedar Villas is a 104 -unit rental housing community developed in conjunction with the Dakota County Community Development Agency. Twenty percent of the units are tax credit housing with project -based Section 8 assistance. Cedar Villas demonstrates our ability to develop and manage a mixed income property in partnership with another public entity. This development received tax credits, tax- exempt housing revenue bonds, tax increment assistance, Dakota County Community Development Agency funds and MHFA funds. THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE • Planning Commission consideration January 2010 • City Council Preliminary approval February 2010 • City Council Final approval April 2010 • FHA submittal July 2010 • FHA approval December 2010 • Closing and construction start February 2011 • Construction completion March 2012 • Rent up achieved August 2013 fll 9 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT The Comprehensive Guide Plan needs to be amended from Institutional (related to Colonial Church) to Multifamily thereby allowing the senior housing. There are several significant policy reasons to approve this amendment: • According to the 2000 census, Edina has over 10,000 residents over the age of 65 comprising over 22% of Edina's population. • Our market study showed a demand for senior housing in excess of five times the number of units that are being developed on the site. • The senior housing will complement the mission of Colonial Church through providing volunteer and ministry opportunities with the senior residents. • The Multifamily land use adjacent to an Institution use (Colonial Church), public uses (Countryside Park and the Fire Station) and the Crosstown Freeway is an appropriate land use. • At the same time the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment is being considered, a rezoning and subdivision application are being considered so there is no chance that a very high density Multifamily use could later be inserted. If all of the requests are approved, it will limit the Multifamily land use to senior housing. In addition, Colonial Church will only sell the land for the proposed senior housing development. Attached as Exhibit A is the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment application. REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION The property needs to be rezoned to Planned Resident District 5 — Rest Homes, Convalescent Homes and Nursing Homes for the proposed 150 unit Waters Senior Living of Edina. This proposed rezoning is appropriate for the following reasons: • As described above, the rezoning and the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment are consistent and recognize the need for more senior housing in Edina. The rezoning insures that the land will be used exclusively for senior housing. • The senior housing is not detrimental but complementary to the adjacent properties. To the west the Colonial Church and the senior housing will 10 AIaL, have a synergistic relationship through volunteering and ministry. To the north, Countryside Park will not be used by the seniors. The fire station to the east will not be impacted. The Crosstown Freeway to the south will not be impacted. • The proposed 150 unit senior housing development equates to 24.59 units per acre on the 6.1 acre site. The senior housing will be a self contained community providing the residents with most of their daily living needs. • As the RLK Traffic Impact Analysis states "the existing roadway network is predicted to easily handle the additional traffic generated by. the proposed site." The senior housing development will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. • The process that we have followed and the material attached to this letter are consistent with the Edina City Code. We have worked hard to communicate the proposed development to adjacent property owners through a mailing, a neighborhood meeting and three meetings with members of Colonial Church. • The proposed senior housing will be part of the overall Colonial Church campus. HGA was retained as the architect to assure the design of the senior housing complements the Colonial Church architecture and adjacent landscaping and natural features. HGA received national awards for their design of Colonial Church. We are designing the senior housing to the same standards. Attached as Exhibit B is the Rezoning Permit Application. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION The Preliminary Development Plan application provides the development details for the proposed senior housing. As stated in the Rezoning Section above, the proposed senior housing will be an asset to the neighborhood and the City of Edina. We strongly believe the proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina will not only complement the Colonial Church campus but will be the finest senior housing in Minnesota. An indication of our commitment to quality is the Colony at Eden Prairie which was developed, constructed and managed by our team. We encourage Edina officials to visit the Colony. The Waters Senior Living of Edina will be a step up in quality from the Colony. 11 413 We have assembled an experienced team that can design, build and operate this senior housing in these challenging times. Listed above in the Development Team Section is a description of the team and our development experience. Attached as Exhibit C is the Preliminary Development Plan Application. SUBDIVISION APPLICATION The senior housing site is currently part of the Colonial Church.parcel. The 6.1 acre senior housing parcel will consist of most of the land except around the covered bridge to the east of Nine Mile Creek. Attached as Exhibit D is the Subdivision Application. AFFORDABLE HOUSING The current proposed senior housing does not incorporate affordable housing. At each of the church and neighborhood meetings there were seniors asking about the availability of affordable housing. The Colony at Eden Prairie has 20% of the units affordable (50% of the metro median income). The affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its affordable housing goals. To accomplish this there is a need for financial assistance to make up most of the cost to provide the affordable housing. The Waters Senior Living is developing the Waters Senior Living of Minnehaha in south Minneapolis that has 20% of the 77 units being affordable. The City of Minneapolis provided twenty years of pay -as- you -go tax increment financing and $40,000 per unit of upfront housing subsidy funds. The most efficient way for a city to provide the financial assistance is through the use of tax increment financing, especially when the land has not already been generating property taxes, as is the case here. The upfront subsidy funds could be achieved through waiving development related fees (such as the park dedication fee — where none of the senior residents will be using any Edina parks) and housing subsidy funds (Community Development Block Grants or HOME funds). If Edina would like to incorporate the affordable housing, we are willing to work with the City to accomplish this as we have done with senior housing in Eden Prairie and Minneapolis. 12 A(`� In summary, The Waters Senior Living of Edina will provide a high quality of life for the future senior residents and will be an asset for the City of Edina. The senior housing will be part of the Colonial Church campus and will become a good neighbor like Colonial Church has been for over thirty years. The senior housing will free up single family homes for families to move into Edina. Finally, there is also the opportunity to create affordable housing benefiting thirty senior families and helping Edina meet their affordable housing goals. Thank you for your consideration of our requests. Please call Jay Jensen at 952- 358 -5110 or e -mail him at igy@shelteggDrp.com with any questions. Sincerely, Jay ensen Waters Senior Living 13 Ted of Edina hvS City of Edina ■ "ON ' 01- r —' 111C MMZ Legord City U.Itz Croak. F� Parks Zaring —C aaaa in is me Us 0 • Wo 211 a, In Z m low IN O S N ... as PCD.21paac�� pCD.3q�_c_D._ A as in w air. P. in III not ow ANN" welooll Bills I m • 1. MINOR SIR us Molotov m IN III ff F3 MUD laaa—M 11� 01 M US —as —WE a" V—"% Eggnog ARM wi Us ads am lose MP It— w - INNa 4. — P .. 4 Moslem go - = ! .Nmmmm in too to ZoNiuG A(; f Q- 9 a r 0 0 N_ C m m 'O E T Rgare 4.3 City of Edina Future Land Use Plan �* 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS ® 0 0.5 Miles comtoe"F011vt All PIAM I- VIEW LOOKING EAST -mmm .'he Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Chul•Ch of Edina ow I !ll'!!I!om g E.. ' mail' Lm _ ; 23 DECEMBER 2009 F , w 7S ltl 1w VIEW LOOKING EAST SHOWING EXISTING VEGETATION Ll at the Colonial Church of Edina a, I � - "i DECEMI�LR 2009 , L"V Ma 1 1 111 ................ mein- MEL= PARTIAL VIEW / SCHEMATIC RENDERED NORTH ELEVATION at ifie Colonial Church of Edina mm mm a MY 911 23 DECEMBER 2009 VIEW LOOKING SOUTH EAST i4L Waters Senior Living of Edi: 23 DECEMBER 2009 at the Colonial Church of Edina ap- u VIEW LOOKING SOUTH EAST SHOWING EXISTING VEGETATION at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 9v W SCHEMATIC RENDERED NORTH ELEVATION at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 -F- t The Waters Senior Living of Edh at the Colonial Church of Edina (D )D �t�rw v PROPOSED TYPE OF LAND USE - MULTI - FAMILY PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS - ISO APARTMENTS FOR ASSISTED SENIOR LIVING PROPOSED DENSITY - SITE AREA 6.14 ACRES 24.4 APARTMENTS I ACRE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL, OFFICE. INDUSTRIALANDIOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS - 254,976 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FEET PROPOSED GENERAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT - 55,993 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED PARKING AREA- APPROXIMATELY 80 SURFACE PARKING SPACES APPROXIMATELY 100 PARKING SPACES j WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAINS AREAS- INDICATED ON SITE PLAN N INGRESS AND EGRESS POINTS TO SITE - INDICATED ON SITE PLAN �4 O PROPOSED TYPE OF LAND USE - MULTI - FAMILY PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS - ISO APARTMENTS FOR ASSISTED SENIOR LIVING PROPOSED DENSITY - SITE AREA 6.14 ACRES 24.4 APARTMENTS I ACRE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL, OFFICE. INDUSTRIALANDIOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS - 254,976 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FEET PROPOSED GENERAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT - 55,993 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED PARKING AREA- APPROXIMATELY 80 SURFACE PARKING SPACES APPROXIMATELY 100 PARKING SPACES UNDER THE BUILDING WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAINS AREAS- INDICATED ON SITE PLAN N INGRESS AND EGRESS POINTS TO SITE - INDICATED ON SITE PLAN CONCEPT PLAN 23 DECEMBER 2009 r �AVIIUM W100t. All AA--, Living of i ci i I iu 23 DECEMBER 2009 at the Colonial Church of Edina e� OLOWAR MVD_ _ _ T — — Preliminary Plat -- - - - - -- *.dc 1',' 41 I The Waters Senior living of Edina a/ �', g1� ;i4 r Ot �r6 I COLONIAL CHURCH OF / I EDiNA SECOND ADDITION / I ,�!a \ I IB00 MeeeM 6emme eUI M[arpvaltl Ylm.bia 101 ?SW x,10 �e ONe bls C \ TL (i]� L' 1-0110 TY. (V52) Y3) -OOTt wu � Intl, IR.1 N! DUSTING PROPERTY DESCRIMON: \ PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPITON: _ 1 ?�' "tl a :c e�i �n �°�O1i• o m. �o rmma e.rr m w �m.r l \ IP J COLONUL YAY 1 ws wy.r uses mtl orme..ti.>o„a. rim RAM OF BGAFMM .orb mTO"ral."� 4 o w In swe w FEET REL I At 0 01 PLkT THE liter ,-I I r.. CHURCH`.' _ EDWA 1 %hill - j ' � � 1 1.., {- ��i. 1�E. t V� /•,,,.- �'� 1, owowla�cl..an u.,alm - � � � � � - .. N.a..dPftQS. SM >MS.. p N 1l1 � 1 N p I I [ ums nrlr w { :11r1 ,�`• E �c 9! Fa II �nua roaur N� :m �i� tmPi� naumrim' bsM, WSWh I` 4.� ,rn gmpmp,.e�mrua. rorm ai • '1 `r i 1 � � I / / \ TablPaltlrp RONOtl •3,f6W. � - � � nlrtl6rl�n1 ®u I I n Nman.n rtm lot y byre. , rr.0 i iii,`/yiu° i dffv� rl ` \I� •` II' a.,. Smn�SoS:- t - s -� - -,r -ice i. �•�y - SLlvJ.t -e NW. 11A 'y Vt • • {A1[CHANILM ,I. � •r ' � off' t,.v` �® � rt _ ' •�" ' C06E ar #U��unbv�l[,n. —� .- - / � ` /JJ � � a., o'�'conulm iunm� R �(ON o 4 .IL ��.• rrmGni I r�, r+AwL71°Z"�, � 4q ` ; ` f`;;; `; ;,r •�`. � a. _ h., w m amm mm rm � an umm r� m a� um m- i I A61 � Rik �jN�A,�Cyycppc1� To IV / . - 1 � - CP-1 PACKAGE FOR.. INFORMATION ONLY Boundary /Topographic Tree Survey 1 1 r f` {dCnM C�urcn of EaaMa�� , •! PIO NaR 05- i16�11 -y�tl �pppy' 1A._/ .it I = umw M-r rt w"iwbilb r�ibu`n�R wrinw wN u el 01 ,k6' The Waters Senior living of Edina of SGLE IR fFFf f3GtSIS OF SEARI OSy —� — urn.. r a nocoa�iLV•w �M1. uuM:.0 I�[ COLONIAL CHURCH €O /NA, MN 4y��,yb� 7 1009 M LEGENG " • - rar u[wuavr rrrP —Pr— O • iv u�mm[°wS'vei F0 �p� 0 . TmV btww Vaaac �r� �. �ilurTmViv 1eY . n¢ au RmxVpoR V�v MW0V MG PROPERTY D®LNPOW - Riasrm rii rM r`�a� 4 biw.t ..- 11r Prm>: ; � w M`�r•�iw. w M1 Rw ... x.rra c..iM R.s�a 'j MPRDPOSED PROPERTY DEBCR M ME �- ° °r_bris:r�rnw ��i..r wiw:e.u:n`•a•�`R IM rr.ax ww.a. Pear r w a ctlur wP . wvM [Y rxK �wM> a .fE blwr erX RM M beu. L M a r�rY .�- Ibu oeorl .rr m. a Pw.a> [rrr� •, a. swear Iln �'�arx... > (.... m.m..b ro x .run w. nrl[ .or ewi. re. �1 it u�°u � e: r.: i u�` -m°-n u•`w••MO.�. +,nr r.r x..e.. zrmzoRx . > Y+�r •rwm rx rww > i�.� n�4 a wv_aml•T. �iN� r�i.w�M.n warm � aiRne m w m�u.b•«rr.� �..F.war�uw....a.Nlo..�..:.. �....,r �.a.. 8 fi it Y pp �F E M OU2 D � D ^ � s m 26 c tn�m � To0 4 aHH9 A M f j Cert/f/acte of surrey W/ Proposed Building Overlay �qo` The Waters Senior living of Edina ok' COLON /AL CHURCH 11 EO /NA, MN ; 1 1, \ — — — +— - ��p `- �B7Ytr'f _ COMM" WAY .... 5637J�7 E - - ' Y• - - G Z --� .�- .-77.T 1� — — — — .rw+• r r:. :— --t. _ i ... �:y I'D i CO G 01%0 0 4D V 3 U00 COL /�+"" O j ,� {�` `t � `1�-'�''. , U G O `� j• L�isie�' - -S�:ZU OG G Las LEGM UY o 4. _ �A1 .37 ��..... ... � OZ�5p0• _ . „ � � ®: na;c my _ - -�- _ `DAs - "" s _ 0 `� 1 q 1099 �e 0 L Z 1S ISs S S Y� �s� 0 9 0 a CCCC� F o a 6N W Tree Inventory 40 <� The Waters Senior living of Edina ok COLONIAL CHURCH ' E®INA, MN v. my my �av �mv ��o HIM P 4 $ @8 �t 8 A)l e s u OgD 2� N � 3 U y x N m � N ` T uN mSW O Z ab d n e g -p J - _ -- - - - --- --------------- I - r--- , -=T- -- ---.fir ZIPW ,a iii 54 RS `"a KA «{�, § DEMOUT NOTES- -- - -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- - - ututttaoNrAns KEY NOTES .. a 1 .. .. - .. . Ol $ G �j THL WATLA RLIVINO �` PREOMINARYDEVELOPMENT SrTE DEMOLF AN THEWATERS �Yi. 0O F O wn- ga._oa s[uion i..s.nc Pmp..d S..i., Ncf 4— O . —_— - - — - GOO oF The C.I.hi.d .--h.f Edi.0 ' - -_ - R__— _.IUSfd1Y -71� —oust W 9-� i I P wro-�o eu nc I I I_ I RY J�c r - - - - ; -- SLAVACMG LECMM lE®o 9 �, EAR1}IYV0RK N0TE9_ IBT0IWWA7ER MAwioEwExrffiMWIY: EC bo - .... THE WATERS SENIOR VING ?. -. 0 .... . ON - LI N _AR o ' ' PREUMIN EVH.DPMENT SITE DRAINARA E, T H SWAT E R S ++ ..................... • ••"••• •. OF EDINA V .. AND SURFACING SENI00. LI \'INf.' •••••••.••••.. . •.•••.. . . • . •."•.•.. "•• •,., P.P.. d $QYOf Ho uwg Cw pw CN51 horEdire ..._ _ _..... C40 0 o f Th,C,1 -id Chm 112 m/32 MDW/3 SNf3 ]HS/3 CSI/4 14 `SN HMIMB MW/3 6 KpP/Z MDW/4 b P/3 6 On, QM 13, NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: LEGEND: THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Ptopoad Scalar Hmnang an ft Cam4w ..... .... .... .. . ofTtw Colonial Chumh ofUna PLANT MATERIAL5 SCHL & i PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN 5icy- pw 112 m/32 MDW/3 SNf3 ]HS/3 CSI/4 14 `SN HMIMB MW/3 6 KpP/Z MDW/4 b P/3 6 On, QM 13, NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: LEGEND: THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Ptopoad Scalar Hmnang an ft Cam4w ..... .... .... .. . ofTtw Colonial Chumh ofUna PLANT MATERIAL5 SCHL & i PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN 5icy- THE WATF 100. LIVING T14F ATERS SEN100. LIVING' pmp." S. OA the C—P. of Tho Colo,.— —amb of Edi. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT GROUND LEVFI- FLOOR PU SKEET i0b S __p � L CAD OUT-UNE PLAN 53.787 SF Ir P,.,,Mlwy DEVELOPMENT SECOND LEVEL THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING THEWATERS OF EDFNA FLOOR PLAIN 71� Flmposod S=ot H—ng on Lb, Ca-p- r FT-k Ch—h.fUmn X. K, A202 ti THIRD LEVEL CAD OUTLINE PLAN 51392 SF TliIEWATIERS SENIOR LIVING- THIRD LEVEL ROM PLAN . ... ..... .... THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING P_=_'=� =1 PlAtUMINAKY UtVtLtft I I FLOOR PLAN VISION HISTORY- THIS SHEET KJkTNSLM .03 law Z-t- FOURTH LEVEL CAI) OUTUNE PLAN 43,969 SF FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR KM THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT FOURTH LEVEL TliEWATFR FLOOR PLAN OF EDINA 71 SENLOR LIVING- 6--Z Pmp..d S-i.� H.-i.g - tb. C.V. . xwR a . .... ... ............ aThe colmw Chumh orEdim K9 - A204 W PRELIMINARY SOUTH ELEVATION PRELIMINARY SOUTH ELEVATION I I I I I ® :1 �o yyk C I I a! PRELIMINARY EAST ELEVATION = s �{ THE WATEP OR LIVING - -- P��YDEVBOPMEW EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS gw!w THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING' '�+ _ r _ Ropoad SC 400 oflLe Coh. <h afFd'm �,s .�.., 10 �'O°r . pa — .. PRELIMINARY NORTH ELEVATION - ! I U a] Lur 1H to I PRELIMINARY NORTH ELEVATION PRELIMINARY WEST ELEVATION THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING PmimjNARy DEVELOPMENT E)(TERlOR ELEVATIONS PP TH— WATER [R. F OF EDINA S Pp..d Savior H—mg -.b. C=V. KEW510N K5TURI A401 W—Amadm WIN ra Fro Willi mIIIIIII= I PRELIMINARY WEST ELEVATION THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING PmimjNARy DEVELOPMENT E)(TERlOR ELEVATIONS PP TH— WATER [R. F OF EDINA S Pp..d Savior H—mg -.b. C=V. KEW510N K5TURI A401 7 , � / . ' {^ / / � r -\ | | -1 | - | � lw lz Ikk PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SfrE LAYOUT PLAN THE WATER' 1 Lrv9NC; ~..~..-' ' -- s3RD sr w � i SaRD sr w ■- m _ Z - SOUrH DR z 0 < ' 1 i SMETANA RDi i. i Yl DOOR]) .__ S _ h �P% I'O i r I � i PARKWOpO RD `C - -- = AYR�+M } �I MOND DR GDLF TER —+�, SETH Si W - 0 -- 54TH Si [w- =- FU IDYLY1pOD �� O °o z /��1NDSOR AVE -5 - - FULLEft SSTH ST STW W R0881N5 5T` Y OG < rte_ -__ . R -OAK D0. , SsTH Sq vHOLLO EE LN ,0EERO rc , 56TH ST W i 55TH ST W riONNE TER o FIELD WAY Frp 2 . `ym W r� . 56TH - �n -... - SfiTH ST DOVRE DR I ��• K/,YMAR DR - p z _ J TOWER ST ,� ���� �, °� O ( _._. '; \ SOUTHVIEW LN - 57TH Si W - m 57TH 5T W �` ' O 0 < � WOODLAND RD ac gRE RD ARKWOOD LN O HE i z > N W P O W GRO P GROVE ST G- m GROVE ST in m z ♦ �y i MY D EST — s I SETH ST, W . SBTH ST W R,p� W Y W z O W -BENTON AVE — .. I >m a w j ASPENS • ° y�N RO _ in I < W I a w a w o 59TH ST w 3 Zo DATA PARK LAN FORD DR u r Y`00 o i ° ° ` ll �Sr w';' - - -- m w 68TH 5T w n PJ o 61 STSTW - O 4 3 -. y 160TH m W 0 < x �pE C1RI' ° RN°� - 5F T ' 61ST 5T W y p9j Y o 61St 5T w < N ° �•p ;jMJE - { JEFF PL BI0.CHCRW . tiF� < .61ST 5T W 1 .1 O 9?CTICWP 0 yN - O 62ND ST W yea a a J� a . .` GLEAS ON i MADDOX LN ROBERTS PL < - D m 62ND ST W - y62ND ST W - 62ND ST W yy MC ., ONIAI WAY = u_��GARRUOM LH x O �ZAGE DR w CA ULE PD' 63RD ST,,W 9y _ r O E > i 5113 VALLEY J`E� 9 > m ` n W = m AVE _ - a - - - - w y TN ST W 64TH ST W TIMBER ROG :--.� s o < a t i < 64TH ST W o < . O K= o< W _ 3 3 ..0. ^J' • i i r �6YLN a z n °p r �' r 65TH ST W 65TH5T W rk a ` ~ i rp 3 it o \IFS 1 I Legend s LEY RD ��eK °R QO v= 66TH ST �� , C1� 66TH ST W RE � 11 z s O� p rn Stream 5E �LOIS L n q a a S P OR �% 67TH ST W N O i ,,GU a SUSAN AVE 3 q p r Alternative Trail Routes` - 'L MF OOwFNS 4' m C BALFANZ RD ��.� W N w > ALLEY VIEW RD i 68TH ST W ._ M _- O OvG r Rp m U/io 'Q. < a < _ < i CNpPEL DR.; O .Q GgNP C fR TER �y v �� w ti O m CAT Team Alternative Routes �� BROOK DR r . r� LZ ..- IYAFORD Y 02 �6 9TH ST W O 3 y �, _ WA i y 9TH ST W w= i ERIN1 MCGUIRE RD ..qr °'VDF O DONBERRYLN x a> City of Edina Property * �,. i • . QA rBERCRDM�`� 13A — 70TH ST W 3 _ *0 !_sT''''' ANDOVER RD O °J -- 70 1/2 ST W Edina School District Property pp� Sbgti 9y�°aI 2 ' i ` ~ BELYIDERE LN m v N D 71ST ST W, i O PJ rR!<SP'gS7q LN D AJ O P HAZELTONR 20 711/2 ST W Fr lternative Trail Route Number r O P p d*T R, UUMLH U NHgy gMD4 F�R i x TH DR 1DR O i I U O J T E W C .1 Miles �0 DEWEY HILL RD - U =- i S2S'9VE- -. t7- 74TysTw _- 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 I O G 74TH ST W -�I ; Qp,RKLAWN nVE- 20A C < - m Q T SEDUM LN `ry75TH ST,W 1 o`t► f * Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflect 'y� �p°pq �i' P x W conceptual trail corridor and does not depict e %P <� . 76TH ST 13 B * .�. i i►�i tii. i. 1 m x actual trail alignment. p SAIEr - ` Jc - ' z 77TH ST w 77TH ST W W Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: City of Edina Alternative Trail Routes 03006 KLK Wc. OL(NCER BLVD_ _ 588578. £ Pre liminary P lat 63684 — T to r r W h� _' oN LOT 1 or.. \ POND I I I I I I I 1 , I I I 1 I I � I _ I I 159.89 _ The Waters Senior //v/ng of Edina o4r 556 I T COL ON /AL CHURCH OF EO /NA SECOND A00 /T /ON I� I I 1 11 �� \ '� I Omr / D.wlopr. DNgw, Fnynw \ er1� P SnYI� capwntbn p611( IncapwetM f �-d 0 &oue c�F Orle \\ � K � \ I Md. (053) 550 -5110 id. (G53) OS] -0833 555.5 \ Kurt Y. KI.0 o Q I EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: \\ N' \ I w.a: K..'i.�m.n:.w°�p1••m�. zm. r.sz .mna .me.. m w �.ar r.l \\ 1^ I PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: m 11 � \ \ I\ Kw.venr. 4o�ssa �' I COLONLIL FA 73�PF 369'JJ'd7 E' — 17 .74 — — 332 96 — '- - - - -- ----- - - - --- c - ---- - - - - -- u..Y. aYU z )840CK NCTE >r. LOT z 273,094 V.,t. BASM OF BEARWM 6.33 ocr..3 2 100 ^ _ ¢ ?, -- / ON rtY x� 3,39 .w�:"Nr„w; �: «f 1►• � - 10.00 DD r1a. 5G1E IN FEET 111 i o� N� o; a� m� o: LEGEND: Principal Arterial (Reliever) Minor A�erial (Aug Minor `� S' Minor Arterial - Collector �`° I City of Edina }y 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Functional Classification 4 +dr Figure 7.5 co fi_ 62f3 24 Zl , 62d _ 6205 MWF ' ' •�M A ll 6208 F,wis y- .1 1� 6209 1 6217 f ,, , �M,� v 1 ",C�}, -C' �• t 1. 6301 6300 r� iv 41 6301 ♦ '\f 1 A 8.:" 8308 F { vi 5efho(k A4�- t' a 1 r rC -M" "r 41— 6100 6103 6100 ••* r" 6108 5877 -5813 5800 5803 3601 I 6113. 6109 617? 6108 6111 1 i 1908 6177 5901 5900 5872 5828 58? 5820 3816 5811 5808 5801 5800 5711 5710 5708 5701 5700" 1 6116 6121 co fi_ 62f3 24 Zl , 62d _ 6205 MWF ' ' •�M A ll 6208 F,wis y- .1 1� 6209 1 6217 f ,, , �M,� v 1 ",C�}, -C' �• t 1. 6301 6300 r� iv 41 6301 ♦ '\f 1 A 8.:" 8308 F { vi 5efho(k A4�- Cary Teague From: Tom Jenson Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 10:21 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Marty Scheerer Subject: Fire Department Comments for The Waters Senior Living of Edina on Colonial Way Cary, Here are fire department comments for the site of the proposed building at Colonial Church, The Waters Senior Living of Edina. 1. Install fire hydrant at the main entrance to the site. Final location to be approved during plan review meetings. 2. Install fire hydrant near the southwest corner of the building. Location to be approved during plan review meetings. 3. Install a fire apparatus access road along the west and south sides of the building. Increasing the width to 10 feet for the proposed 6 -foot wide sidewalk along the west and south sides of the property would meet this requirement. The sidewalk to be engineered to support the weight of fire apparatus. If you have any questions, let me know. Regards, Thomas Jenson Fire Marshal Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina Mn 55436 952.826.0337 Fax 952.826.0393 www.CitvofEdina.com/fire Ai City of Edina MEMORANDUM TO: Cary Teague, Planning Director FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Chief Building Official DATE: January 7, 2010 SUBJECT: The Water Senior Living of Edina, 6220 Colonial Way Planning Case — 2010.0001 I was asked to review the development proposal plans stamped "BUILDING DEPARTMENT, DEC 30 2009, CITY OF EDINA" for the above referenced project. Inspection Department comments: 1. Revise plans to provide a graphic representation of all accessible routes within the site. 2. Revise plans to provide a minimum of two accessible parking spaces in the west parking lot and provide an accessible route to the main entry. Alternately, the four required exterior, accessible parking spaces may be located around the perimeter of the entry drive. The designer and other interested parties must meet with an Inspections Department plan reviewer at 30 %, 60% and 90% plan completion. H: \My Documents\ Memos &Rpts \Planning \6220ColonialWAy1.DOC City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Afl 952 - 927 -8567 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 ,1'� e V .by DATE: January 21, 2010 MEMORANDUM — Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO: Cary Teague — Director of Planning FROM: Wayne Houle —City Engineer SUBJECT: The Waters — Senior Living 6200 Colonial Way CITY OF EDINA Engineering has reviewed the above stated project and offer the following comments: Permits needed: A Nine Mile Permit will be required for storm water, grading, and erosion control. A MCES permit will be required for the sanitary sewer extension. A MDH permit will be required for the watermain extension. An Edina Curb Cut Permit (obtained in the Engineering Department) will be required for the driveway entrance. REC and SAC fees will be required for this project. Traffic Analysis: See attached minutes of Transportation Commission for their comments. Sheet C200 — Site Demolition Plan: 1. Indicate pavement removal for utility tie -ins. 2. Indicate removal of sediment in drainage ditch located on the north side of property from the outlet of the 42" RCP. 3. Indicate removal of any sediment depth in pond by existing parking lot outlet. Sheet C300 — Site Layout Plan: 1. Provide turn - around at west end of parking lot (very difficult to turn around if all spaces are full). 2. All entrances from Colonial Way can only be 30 -feet wide by City Code. The westerly entrance can be split into two entrances if you place a landscape island between the in / out drives. 3. Should the note shown by the on -ramp to TH62 regarding "access limitation" be changed from County Highway to State Highway? Sheet C500 — Site Utility Plan: 1. Provide storm water calculations for all site ponding and other watershed requirements. 2. Provide water and sanitary sewer usage so staff can verify system tie -in. Developer will be required for any upsizing of public infrastructure to meet these additional usages. 3. Is the westerly pond designed to meet NURP Standards? 4. Replace hydrant at northeasterly corner of site to the new City Standard — see details online. 5. Will need to know pipe materials during next submittal. 6. A developer agreement will be required for the placement of the Sanitary Sewer within Colonial Way. Sureties along with engineering fees will be required for this portion of pipe. 7. A separate plan and profile sheet will also be required for this portion of pipe. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks #16 G: \Engineering \General \C Streets\6200 Colonial Way \Engineering Review \20100121 WH -Edina to CT -Edina review of 6200 Colonial Way.doc vvY wk. IV WWI', L4W7 N- 14 VINZ Nit K OWA 45 (TA Aft Al I,. all 7 L" dip 77 V. 47W /WpP AN jr wk. IV WWI', L4W7 N- 14 VINZ Nit K OWA 45 (TA Aft Al I,. all 7 L" dip 77 V. 47W /WpP AN \•455 +!�' ��� �r � •� �, * * r its A • `' 0�fyw�� s� i if { l l�a� �� j•� ! .,.,.fir. / t !� r �, �� r. t fir. \A w-- `� C �, ;�� ��5f ti , 't ��,�� M� • .TI ��Pv �5.� �y.. •� �CsR�I ? �'`i �� f ') 14`►Lr` — }�. ,•�lf: �"tL�n '� 1 �1 e.,.�p. �• �� �1.,, ±: 41�4`TF•• f i.!iR�e, � • t/'".JI_ )/ �, ,.� `LQ� �7, 1 ,�..n �'� /i fl , �r�r •.. - r t �� < `� `:1 / r�,• 1'4{� — li�w� OG(' Yi�v�� a�r.'4 rr •i _�►� :/ ?s ` { � �� 4` �y +y � r. _ ` rat �:. ��.� f M� `rR >. Yy � i� � . .�., � .��`9 1. � �i��.4•,. iI Al • ��`,� w. -.M- ... !. ". - _ I• •/ yam,,,. . ,.�' . • r fir~ � bf.�t �• i � � �sy; gY( w� r4r�� {r' �s lit: �,j t' qrr�+ �l +, i i� +F �r •�,.>, t '.� r,Vl', F .} f� .t i h r.h' ! ,I•� r. +t' �sf7'J �� �e�f el rlj� •.•�4'r1 F0 `.,I '• ' 1ST',,/ss•�1 `� Iry'J� ►1�,1\ �•. �ffM1e /` • +illy /.'��fj.�a t.t i Sf I + �fT:: ��tf.s' %'?��1 t,�.�. "�f -Ifi: .i�.^u �� � � � •rP�' '.� r r '�T r�.�i �! �� '} ,.�Ji,%o� •(11! r �f!�' %a d,r�� !� /J �1 �(1•��.JI "irif� fl�ji, y7 i! �� � }". �'• yrt. 'e "4' !�M •1 /i� �' 'A���(+�.�' �:� ,I� i�, "1, ��l .� ,f'J� ,�•�,'tlr 6.?li.,��i�rt'1:lli/: r1t� � �'Q is:.. 1�� r'� 1: � .l•�� /.. 1,2 � � �.� "'�i�t, � .'. �'. %!. ��,f� ''% rim t� ^�r 1i {•t�+t'i . F;,� ie+ ;,: ; t �. �� �1l;y�j•i ly�} 4Yi• � • +•dF• ';��.�,. �;• � °,:�'••�F y1�' '! , r.� �R.� ?«'� ;t;,� !9;�tr�'�ds')ti ��:y� :� s. .J _ , - ��,, �,,•�+ Ael� - 'ij jf,fi.��ri• zt�p�• .�. ���;)�n r�+ 14� �+��:� �( � •;�,+ :1llb�i i 1 'J'n,f� �t r �j'• !� r ( , �S 1 �::+: j• � 1 ;j . i` y +• >L � . 'IIyT� � � +� � fll� `I�r�v � ��:�j' �r',r .f 9 r Y } VT {►r�+ +sS I,1� r!�. �Y,t 4Y.x •''J �U�•Ftl�l •r ti,��l. fo;•,i r i`'iJ!�t - .,_a.tr✓ ".'.iT•�._,�, _ . . ^ - ..,� _ - _ _ _ - ~ r 'n�� 1 ��_- - ✓�' jam, ` _ -SIB s •_ IP .a i "1 lRy 1 i a lfev s + 1 R• Q INK ;i .4i'fs • } 3, y r�al V.1 let ..(� r ti 1� ! �+ . %�; �� p",,�.a;'r � ,1: ,` ;� � r,�►Q i �.• ffffflllll� � �+ MK� ,irlt� i'C �`is�'�'e�•� 4�p� � Fr'!� i• �, "` � I -�` �' �./� r%d. .;,r•r I� !a 0A. t tAL n . f w rr • x� r e Traffic Impact Analysis for The Colony of Edina in Edina, MN January 14 9 2010 Creating extraordinary Communities A�, TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The Colony of Edina Edina, MN January 1961, 2010 Prepared For: Shelter Corporation 1600 Hopkins Crossroad Minnetonka, MN 55305 Prepared By: /0000� REK INCORPORATED RLK Incorporated Minnetonka Office 6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 952- 933 -0972 RLK Project No. 2009 -087 -L TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... ..............................1 H. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND STUDY AREA ......................... ..............................2 M. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................... ..............................5 A. Data Collection ................................................................................................ B. Existing Traffic Volumes ................................................................................ ..............................5 ............................... 5 C. Roadway Descriptions ...................................................................................... ..............................5 D. Intersection Descriptions .................................................................................. ..............................6 IV. PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................................... ..............................8 A. Trip Generation ................................................................................................ B. Trip Distribution and Assignment .................................................................... ............................... 8 ............................... 8 C. Build Traffic Volumes ................................................. ..............................: ...... ............................... 9 V. RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ............................. .............................12 A. Traffic Forecast Scenarios ............................................................................... .............................12 B. Operational Analysis Methodology .................................................................. .............................13 C. 2009 Existing Conditions Analysis ............................................................... ............................... D. Build Conditions Analysis ............................................................................... .............................13 E. Review of Access Locations ............................................................................ .............................14 VI. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT ....................................... .............................15 A. Bicycle and Pedestrian .................................................................................... .............................15 B. Transit .............................15 ............................................................................................................. VII. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................. .............................20 A. Travel Demand Management Plan ................................................................. ............................... 20 B. Specific Travel Demand Management Strategies ............................................ .............................20 VIII. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................... .............................21 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 — Vicinity Map ............................... 3 ........................................................................................... Figure2 — Concept Site Plan ..............................4 ...................................................................................... Figure 3 — 2009 Existing Traffic Volumes and Geometrics ........................................ ..............................7 Figure 4 — Trip Distribution & Assignment ............................................................... .............................10 Figure5 — Build Traffic Volumes ............................................................................. .............................11 Figure6 — Pedestrian Facilities ................................................................................. .............................16 Figure7 — Bicycle Facilities ..................................................................................... .............................17 Figure8 — Bus Route 146 ......................................................................................... .............................18 Figure9 — Bus Route 578 ......................................................................................... .............................19 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this Transportation Impact Analysis is to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Colony of Edina senior housing development. The proposed site is located on the south side of Colonial Way in the northwest quadrant of the Highway 62 and Tracy Avenue interchange in Edina, MN. Traffic impacts were analyzed at the following three intersections: ➢ Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way ➢ Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard ➢ Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way Impacts to pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities were also investigated. The proposed site, which is projected to be complete in 2010, consists of a senior care facility with 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living, and memory care, a surface parking lot, an underground parking garage and common areas. Vehicular access to the site will be through two access on Colonial Way. The following summarizes the results of the analysis, as well as additional information presented in the report: ➢ The proposed development will generate 32 weekday AM peak hour trips, 55 weekday PM peak hour trips and 437 daily trips. ➢ The Existing operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations for the study area intersections. ➢ The Build operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations with the inclusion of site - generated tragic. ➢ The proposed site accesses are predicted to operate acceptably. ➢ No significant impacts to the existing bicycle, pedestrian and transit system are expected. ➢ The developer will commit to specific Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies to aid in lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system. ➢ The developer will provide on -site shuttle or van for residents to travel between The Colony of Edina and retail/grocery and entertainment land uses. It is anticipated that the shuttle will make two trips a day. Additionally, the developer will provide a car that will be available to residents to medical appointments. RLK Incorporated Page 1 of 21 January 19th, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN O ��v H. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND STUDY AREA The purpose of this Transportation Impact Analysis is to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Colony of Edina senior housing development. The proposed site is located northwest quadrant of the Highway 62 and Tracy Avenue interchange in Edina, MN. The site is bordered on the north by Colonial Way, on the east by Fire Station #1, on the south by the Highway 62 westbound on -ramp and on the west by an existing pond. The project location is illustrated on Figure 1, the Vicinity Map. The proposed site, which is projected to be complete in 2010, consists of a senior care facility with 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living, and memory care, a surface parking lot, an underground parking garage and common areas. Vehicular access to the site will be through two access on Colonial Way. Figure 2, the Concept Site Plan, shows the layout of the site and proposed access locations. Based on a scoping meeting with the City of Edina, traffic impacts were analyzed at the following three intersections: ➢ Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way ➢ Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard ➢ Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of traffic generated by the proposed development on the operations and safety of the adjacent roadway network. The study will detail the existing and future roadway conditions with the inclusion of the proposed site at studied intersections. Recommendations regarding geometric and/or traffic control needs to accommodate additional Background and site traffic and improve safety are included, as necessary. In addition to traffic related impacts, this Transportation Impact Analysis includes a Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) to outline measures the developer can use to encourage use of alternate modes of travel and enhanced pedestrian friendliness, by providing a balance in the needs of all users of the transportation system. This includes an analysis of pedestrian, bicycle and transit amenities. RLK Incorporated Page 2 of 21 January i Y -, zu i u The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN A 1 = Q LL 2aoe � INC. SAX ❑NYARD. SLEE L3 W. 5th° ST. L ca L3 v��R _ 1 J' JEFF Z LA �F� = Q Q `� HAW KES ° RIDGE, p �.p� R DR. QRPIRIE RD. O� �� ��TER. q- KAY MAR w WARE E� Q �L VD. X\ J v ¢ �4 FE P BERN MER OLDGR❑ � L,J GROVE 9Q -� SCHAE GROVE - ST, Q Y w LJ w I L CIR CNeRMgN IR. P�� DR. W ; LYLE a ¢ a IR, Q CIR, t, _ �� 156 — �' O� ;RD] Q BENIDN A \. w > COUNTRYSIDE RD, w j Q 46. BLAKE w Bbl, Q U RIDGE RD. z_ d o U o �1LANDP J J Q J AR�O �0�1 RD, FOR ❑LARD" J ° W 61st¢ Cq `r� HUNTER .0 �° Y 'Pf ST- CIR,� JEFF T, PL. fd �C ~ BIRCH C _IC Wq I- WAY EDIN ❑LINGER BLVD. ,SF- � W �" ASON 158 1990 POP 46,075 cR�'S d U M ;T . �,P• � O Q �Z �P LID <ONIAL a 6� DTI <� 1 9 NG toe WHI N N cc H 4ILLS PASS 1 c DORON ER 1P�C�Fq �ZC Cf o J � O� N q t ��F� CREEK VALLEY RD. I- NAL PROJECT SITE Q), q-; y Q BALD ✓ O ELI LA. Q ��Y RD, v DR. Q P W, 66th ST. j�ti Nl�v 6C !J N oZ 00 �(� J go �y V� GRACE TE R. - 0 r w ]C S1 ALBANS SPRY �-� LOIS LA. q Q L4i v W r LL z CIR ' � ,Q� SUSAN Q AVE, a W. 68th ST. 3 = y Q GNAAPEL DR, W �E DR. PROJECT LOCATION: O IOQo Ci E HENNEPIN COUNTY E CIR. o Q 1-- CITY OF EDINA SCALE IN FEET o °i Dnmth m o � nr � rnMN N .� iav� ixniv.0 Pb—. -: 952 9.110972 Cu: 9529.331153 —1ki— 6110 Blue C.itcle Drive . Suite IM . Mumcto"VA 55343 Q THE COLONY OF EDINA VICINITY MAP A62. Figure / Project �� 2009087L m FrD y �yT�NU C�r�M1CN } - �p�06� / _ Odd e t - � o b ACCESS T r�r s o F EAST L ACCESS ss 6� II 40� €I SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY HGA. RLK a ® e�rc+nom 1� ��ql r a11„ �' � XM7,A O THE COLONY OF EDINA CONCEPT SITE PLAN JI�6ilt :� a 9, Q M oy;E 7 70 SCAT 1 "a" f Y led —087L M. EXISTING CONDITIONS Currently, the proposed site is an overflow surface parking lot and an undeveloped wooded area owned by First Colonial Church. Directly across Colonial Way from the site is Countryside Park. A. Data Collection The existing conditions of the nearby roadway system were documented by a field inventory conducted by RLK Incorporated on August 6h, 2009. The purpose of the inventory was to identify features that affect roadway capacity, including intersection traffic control, lane designations, turn lane storage bay lengths, speed limits, etc. In addition to the field inventory, manual turning movement counts were conducted by RLK on Wednesday, June, 24th, Thursday, June 25's and Tuesday, June 30'b, 2009 from 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM to document existing peak hour traffic volumes at the following intersections: ➢ Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way ➢ Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard ➢ Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way B. Existing Traffic Volumes Review of the turning movement data collected indicates that the peak hour volumes generally occur during the following time periods: Weekday AM Peak Hour: 8:00 to 9:00 AM Weekday PM Peak Hour: 5:00 to 6:00 PM C. Roadway Descriptions Vehicular access to the site from the area is expected to occur primarily on three .roadways: Tracy Avenue, Colonial Way and Olinger Boulevard. The following text details the specifics of each of these roadways: ➢ Tracy Avenue is a Collector road near the site as it provides access to Highway 62 south of the site and connects to Vernon Avenue north of the site. Tracy Avenue is two lane road that travels north/south in the vicinity of the site and has a posted 30 mph speed limit. Based on 2009 average daily traffic count data (ADT) provided by City of Edina staff, Tracy Avenue carries approximately 7,730 vehicles per day south of Colonial Way. ➢ Colonial Way is a local two -lane City road that connects Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue. Currently, there is no ADT data for Colonial way. ➢ Olinger Boulevard is functionally classified as a Collector Street. Olinger Boulevard is a two - lane road that travels east/west in the vicinity of the site. Based on 2009 average daily traffic count data (ADT) provided by City of Edina staff, Olinger Boulevard carries approximately 1,879 vehicles per day in the vicinity of the site. rY Lk RLK Incorporated Page 5 of 21 January 19th, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN D. Intersection Descriptions The following paragraphs provide specific details on the existing configuration of the study area intersections. ➢ Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way form a side - street stop - controlled "T" intersection. The eastbound approach is stop - controlled and has a shared left and right turn lane. The northbound approach is free - flowing and consists of a shared left turn and through lane. The southbound approach is free - flowing and is made up of a shared through and right turn lane. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard is a three - legged all -way stop - controlled "T" intersection. The eastbound approach has a shared left and right turn lane. The northbound approach consists of a shared left turn and through lane. The southbound approach is made up of a shared through and right turn lane. ➢ Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way form a side - street stop - controlled "T" intersection. The eastbound approach is free - flowing and has a shared through and right turn lane. The westbound approach is free - flowing and consists of a shared left turn and through lane. The northbound approach is stop - controlled and is made up of a shared left and right turn lane. The 2009 existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and existing geometrics for the study area are illustrated on Figure 3. RLK Incorporated Page 6 of 21 �� January i /� , zu iu The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN Co 2009 RLK INC. . "I V52 108 5 4 100 85 O a ° 2 3 M n E y x x I O M ' a rn V y� O O O V C L 1�- 1 J I C z r i N rn/^\ D&mb. MN N RIX ',loam as ® PhD= 952 933 0972 ['uc 952 933 akw M.. m 6 b110 Blue Circle Dave •Suite too • IYS,mewoka• 2MIN 55343 a c " k: 4 w THE COLONY OF EDINA 'ME rn ;� N 22 11 Be 80 0 • r r rn N N 0 0 r O r 11 4 O 2009 EXISTING VOLUMES & GEOMETRICS i SCALE IN FEET ngure # Project # 2009087L AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING LANES EXISTING STOP CONTROL a c " k: 4 w THE COLONY OF EDINA 'ME rn ;� N 22 11 Be 80 0 • r r rn N N 0 0 r O r 11 4 O 2009 EXISTING VOLUMES & GEOMETRICS i SCALE IN FEET ngure # Project # 2009087L IV. PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation The proposed development will have 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living, and memory care. Table 1 shows the breakdown of the units and associated number of beds. Table 1 I Jnit Breakdown Unit Mix Quantity Beds One Bedroom 21 21 One Bedroom /Den 22 22 Two Bedroom 24 48 Two Bedroom / den 10 20 Three Bedroom 5 15 Care suites 10 10 Memory Support 28 28 Affordable One Bedroom 30 30 Totals 150 194 Based on information from the developer, it is anticipated to have 194 patient beds with a 95 -97% occupancy rate. The volume of vehicle trips generated by the proposed development has been estimated for the weekday AM and PM peak hours and on a daily basis using the data and methodologies contained in the 8'' Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The estimated volume of site - generated trips for the proposed development is summarized in Table 2. The Assisted Living Land Use Code (254) is assumed for the entire development as it encompasses all the types of proposed units and corresponds to the land use description detailed in Trip Generation. Table 2 Trin Generation Estimates) 1. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation. 8 Edition, published by ITE. 2. 194 total beds are proposed with a predicted 97% occupancy rate, resulting in 189 occupied beds, per data provided by the developer. 3. The ITE fitted curve equation was used based on the location of data points and higher amount of studies for daily traffic. 4. ADT represent the Average Daily Traffic over a typical weekday 24 -hour period. B. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site - generated trips to and from the adjacent street system was based on existing and expected future traffic patterns in the area for both the AM and PM peak hours. This distribution pattern, along with the estimated changes in traffic volumes at study area intersections expected as a result of the proposed redevelopment, are illustrated on Figure 4, Trip Distribution & Assignment. RLK Incorporated Page 8 of 21 January i r,,,, zu i u The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN Al v l rips Generated: Land Use ITE Land Size AM Peak PM Peak Wee ay Use Code Rate In Out Rate In Out Rate ADT ' 189 Assisted Living 254 occupied 0.17 23 9 0.29 29 26 NA'- 437 BedsZ 23 9 29 26 437 32 d 1 55 Totals 1. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation. 8 Edition, published by ITE. 2. 194 total beds are proposed with a predicted 97% occupancy rate, resulting in 189 occupied beds, per data provided by the developer. 3. The ITE fitted curve equation was used based on the location of data points and higher amount of studies for daily traffic. 4. ADT represent the Average Daily Traffic over a typical weekday 24 -hour period. B. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site - generated trips to and from the adjacent street system was based on existing and expected future traffic patterns in the area for both the AM and PM peak hours. This distribution pattern, along with the estimated changes in traffic volumes at study area intersections expected as a result of the proposed redevelopment, are illustrated on Figure 4, Trip Distribution & Assignment. RLK Incorporated Page 8 of 21 January i r,,,, zu i u The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN Al v l C. Build Traffic Volumes The Build scenario volumes result when the trip assignment volumes are combined with the 2009 existing traffic volumes, as detailed in Figure 5. RLK Incorporated Page 9 of 21 January 1'/-, Zulu The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN . S zoos RLK INC. - LEGEND 1 R� � ' ,. -- ®` Pbo= 951933 0972 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS XXX E Y 0 6110 Blno Cim r 1. ti PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS XXX ',. ROADWAY Q. LANES GER BLVD, STOP CONTROL c t * - �J • DISTRIBUTION AM% /PM% v ° 0 4 "P S M V4 S 5 4 5 4 4 b 14 olv, 0 ° 5 3 4 8 8 m 7 3 +ti •1 , K n N n .- y 3 o n c VOW . r m L O PROJECT SITE a i' 0 ° ° �� 16 4 3 ,. 0 200 . All SCALE IN FEET 1 a 64 Hmwo.im 1 R� � ps-m o ®` Pbo= 951933 0972 P= 952 9331153 Y 0 6110 Blno Cim • Saito 100 • b inneto" NN 55343 THE COLONY OF EDINA TRIP DIST `UTION & ASSIGNMENT V...r 4 Pro _ '9087L rn 0 E X 2009 RUC INC. t r 0 v ! c L u u r J n m o i rn 0 0 0 a U OY Y L E�a V 23 18 5 4 4r° 19 12 3 4 N IA n RAM IA%9� MN g.L.K '�°w.r: UK o ® P6coc 952 933 0972 14,c52 9331153 6110 BlueVCirde Duwc • Suitc 100 • b wmnim bfN 55343 LEGEND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX ROADWAY LANES P `� V24 14 6 14 orD rn 16 5 0 8 c 29 14 1 O O aq 8o a sw 1 THE COLONY OF EDINA BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Figure 5 Project / 2009087L V. RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS A. Traffic Forecast Scenarios The following two scenarios were considered in evaluating traffic operations near the site: 1. 2009 Existing Conditions. Based on the field inventory of roadway conditions and existing turning movement counts. Build Alternative. This alternative assumes full development of the site with completion by 2010. No background growth is expected on the roadway network as the surrounding neighborhood is fully developed. B. Operational Analysis Methodology Traffic operations for the AM and PM peak hour conditions within the study area were analyzed using the industry- standard Synchro /SimTraffic 6 software package, which uses the data and methodology contained in the 2000 Hi lg iwgy Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as traffic signals and stop - controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volumes on that facility. Various factors affect capacity, including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number and width of travel lanes, intersection control, etc. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter designations from "A," representing the best operating conditions, to "F," representing the worst. In general, LOS "E" is the minimally acceptable condition during the peak periods of the day. At intersections, the letter grades are assigned based on the average delay per vehicle experienced during the peak hour on a particular approach or movement. The grade for the intersection as a whole is based on a weighted average of each movement. Table 3, below, details the ranges for each letter grade for unsignalized intersections, in seconds of average delay per vehicle. Table 3 Level of Service vs. Average Delay - Unsignalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 0 -10 B 10 -15 C 15-25 D 25-35 E 35-50 F 50 — and u -Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research noaro_ A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the lineup of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable level of RLK Incorporated Page 12 of 21 January 1 ym, zu i u The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN 0 service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with a 5% chance of occurring during the peak hour, is considered the standard for design purposes. C. 2009 Existing Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the existing conditions. Tables 4a and 4b show the results of the Build Conditions analysis. Table 4a Results of Existing Conditions Analysis — AM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service" 95th Percentile Queues 2. Q Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A L Adequate queue lengths. NBUT queue of 33'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard A/A(SBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A ML) Adequate queue lengths. 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement LOS reported from SimTraffic. 2. 95'" percentile queues reported from SimTraffic Table 4b Results of Existina Conditions Analysis — PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of 95`h Percentile Queues Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A L Adequate queue lengths. NBUT queue of 44'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard A/B (NBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way I A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. Operations of the Existing roadway network are acceptable. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS is B or better and all 95th percentile queues arc accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. The interactions between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection were investigated to determine if any traffic problems exist as these two intersections are only 400 feet apart. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 950h percentile queues of 33 feet in the AM peak hour and 44 feet in the PM peak hour. No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. No improvements are recommended- for the Existing Conditions. D. Build Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the Build conditions. Tables 5a and 5b show the results of the existing conditions analysis. RLK Incorporated Page 13 of 21 January 191h, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN Table 5a Results of Build Conditions Analysis — AM Peak Hour Intersection Service'* Level o 95 h Percentile Queues 2. Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A L) Adequate queue lengths. NBUT queue of 44'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard A/A (SBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A L Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & West Access A/A L Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & East Access A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement LOS reported from Sim'17atttc. 2. 95h percentile queues reported from SimTrafiic Table 5b Results of Build Conditions Analysis — PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of 95`h Percentile Queues Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. NBUT queue of 53'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard A/B (NBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A (NBL Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & West Access A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & East Access A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. Analysis of the Build Conditions indicated acceptable operations on the roadway network and proposed site accesses. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS is B or better and all 95'h percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 95`h percentile queues of 44 feet in the AM peak hour and 53 feet in the PM peak hour. No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. If northbound left turn operational and queuing problems arise in the future due to growth in background traffic, it is recommended that this portion of Tracy Avenue be re- striped by the City to provide a dedicated northbound left turn lane onto Colonial Way. No mitigation measures are recommended for the Build Conditions. E. Review of Access Locations The proposed site includes two accesses, a west access that serves the surface parking lot and the east access that serves that underground parking garage and the service dock. The separation of the two accesses is approximately 330 feet and there is adequate site distance for enteringlexiting vehicles. We do not anticipate any operational issues with the proposed accesses as Colonial Way is a low volume road. The Build operational analysis indicates acceptable Level of Service results and adequate queue lengths that do not extend into other access points or intersections. RLK Incorporated Page 14 of 21 ` January 19m, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN ILl1 VI. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT The proposed site is located across the street from a park with pedestrian trails and sidewalks and near two bus routes. These pedestrian and transit amenities, suggest the site is ideally situated to facilitate alternative modes of transportation. A. Bicycle and Pedestrian As shown on Figure 6, Pedestrian Facilities, concrete sidewalks are provided along study area roadways. The proposed project will incorporate new sidewalks from the building to the existing sidewalk system on the south side of Colonial Way. Figure 7, Bicycle Facilities, illustrates the nearby bicycle facilities. Good access to the pedestrian and bicycle systems from the proposed. project will encourage employee and visitor use. B. Transit Numerous transit stops and a Metro Transit Park & Ride lot are located near the site. Existing transit route 146, detailed on Figure 8, travels from Downtown Minneapolis to Edina with stops near the site on Colonial Way. Existing transit route 578, illustrated on Figure 9, travels from Downtown Minneapolis to Edina and the Southdale Mall with stops near the site on Colonial Way. The proximity of access to the transit system adjacent to the proposed project makes this a viable alternative for employees, visitors and residents. RLK Incorporated Page 15 of 21 January IY-, zu iu The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN 2009 RLK INC. d 0 M n 0 1 to rn U O V� U C -C U O r J n a0 O LEGEND' Fxisung Proposed School! - -- Proposed a Sidewalk Business Sidewalk State -Aid Sidewalk 0 U t °e "� City of Edina Ln Y }�p 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update �. E a r 'Hrb• MAN ° Nm R r T M;,, MN Pho 952 933 0972 c Fm 952 9331153 avaa.A14— m -O> 6110 Ehre Circle Dave • Site 100 • Mknetonk%MN 55343 0 .bp it %: J Note: Park Pa*Nays are induded on Figure 7.91 Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.10 THE COLONY OF EDINA PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Flgure % 6 Project 2009087L 0 0 Y m n 0 0 0 0 U �C L U F— m J r m 0 i rn 0 c 0 .o n 0 U U 2009 RLK INC. LEGEND: E)dstirlg Usting Hennepn Proposed I From d* 2007 Edina Comprehensive BgcIeTransportation Plan Park pa wm County Comdors Park pathway — — primary Route Secondary Route e 'y City of Edina Facilities Bicycle Faciliti �y; 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update �• -/ Figure 7.11 �M RILK►� ® Pho 952 933 0972 Fat 952 933 1153 � mmay.riklnccom 6110 Bhu Cirde Drive • Suiw 100 • bTinnetoaka, MN 55343 THE COLONY OF EDINA BICYCLE FACILITIES Proms 2009087L rn 3 0 Y N n' 0 0 6 r u H In v L E a 0 2009 RLIK INC. PROJECT SITE RLKN 0 - 6110 Blue Circ Y.g Ham Lke, MAN MN 0A&%MK Ph— 952 933 0972 Paz 952 933 1153 Swim 100 • Mnsw ^niai, MN 55343 THE COLONY OF EDINA F'- `S ROUTE 146 u i G J�261h St _U, ake Powderhorn Park it x 361n St a ' r J 42nd St cI c. �I 46th St e1r I 52nd St SArh S� �i .a -:3 Figure / 8 Project 9087L 2009 RLK INC. N m 0 I v U 1` O F O O O J Ip O I 0 0 i 0 0 `o a U d � ` IL/1 0 o HomInd -MN N RLK mam MN MN m CAMENNED PLooe 952 933 0972 F=952 9 1153 � 1 6110 Blue (lade Dave • Sdw 100 • b inomonlm, NINi SS343 Minneapolis Downtown Zone Ride in the Downtown ZoRe I PROJECT SITE Hyland Park Reserve �I 'I oI WOOD mi LAKE� Richfield Bloomington w THE COLONY OF EDINA BUS ROUTE 578 N W E I S 1 0 1 Mlles Figure / 9 Project 2009087L VII. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN A. Travel Demand Management Plan The purpose of this Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) is to assist the City of Edina to achieve their transportation goals as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan as they relate specifically to The Colony of Edina site, by managing and minimizing the vehicle trips generated by the development. The Colony of Edina site is predicted to generate a low volume of site - generate traffic with minimal TDM needs, therefore specific travel demand strategies have been developed. B. Specific Travel Demand Management Strategies The Colony of Edina seeks to achieve the City of Edina's goal of enhancing the local transportation system by lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system. The Colony of Edina agrees to implement of the following measures: General 1. Provide informational displays on an bulletin board or kiosk detailing current transit schedules and bike maps. 2. Require truck and/or service deliveries to occur outside of weekday peak traffic times. This does not include FedEx / UPS -type deliveries. 3. Encourage the use of alternate commuting options by dissemination of information to residents, visitors and employees. Transit 1. The developer shall consider transit incentives for employees, such a discounted transit pass. 2. The employer, when possible, shall work with employees to provide flexible work schedules to coordinate with transit schedules and to minimize peak hour vehicular trip generation. 3. The developer shall provide an on -site shuttle or van for residents to travel between The Colony of Edina and retail/grocery and entertainment land uses. It is anticipated that the shuttle will make two trips a day. Additionally, the developer shall provide a car that will be available to residents to medical appointments. Bicycle 1. The developer shall provide bike racks and locker storage facilities for personal belongings for employees that bike to work. Pedestrian 1. Rebuild sidewalks impacted by construction with ADA- compliant curb ramps, encouraging use by a broad cross - section of pedestrian types, and promoting the pedestrian mode of commuting for employees who are nearby residents. 2. Construct and maintain lighted private sidewalks connecting the building accesses to the public sidewalk. RLK Incorporated Page 20 of 21 January 19th, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN 471 VIII. CONCLUSIONS The preceding analysis has evaluated the potential traffic impacts associated with The Colony of Edina development on the operations to the study area roadway and intersections. Travel Demand Management measures are detailed that the developer agrees to implement to aid in lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system. The following summarizes the results to the analysis, as well as additional information presented in the report: ➢ The proposed development will generate 32 weekday AM peak hour trips, 55 weekday PM peak how trips and 437 daily trips. ➢ The existing roadway network is predicted to easily handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed site. ➢ The Existing operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations for the study area intersections. ➢ The Build operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations with the inclusion of site - generated traffic. ➢ The proposed site accesses are predicted to operate acceptably. ➢ No significant impacts to the existing bicycle, pedestrian and transit system are expected. ➢ The developer will commit to specific Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies to aid in lowering peak how travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system. 4� 0 RLK Incorporated Page 21 of 21 January 19th, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN WSB & Associates, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: January 11, 2010 Re: The Colony of Edina Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis for The Colony of Edina, a new Senior housing development on Colonial Way west of Tracy Avenue adjacent to TH 62. Based orf our review of the Traffic Impact Analysis we offer the following comments. 1. The Trip Generation rates used in Table 1 were based on 189 occupied beds (95% occupancy) using the Assisted Living ITE rate category. The description of the proposed facility indicates that the facility will include 150 apartments ranging from independent living units, assisted living units and memory care units. What is the breakdown of each of these unit types? The independent living units will have a higher traffic generation. This should be outlined more clearly. 2. No information is provided with respect to the interaction between the Colony Way and TH 62 Ramp intersections on Tracy Avenue. What is the lane geometry on Tracy Avenue between these intersections? With an existing ADT on Tracy Ave of 7,700, turn lanes at these intersections may be warranted, especially with an additional 500 + vehicles being added from the proposed site turning on to and off of Tracy Avenue. 3. The analysis results indicate that all intersection will operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) on an overall basis. What about the turning vehicles, what is the left tum LOS at the Tracy Avenue intersections? The analysis also indicates that the 95% queue lengths are adequate. What are they? How do they compare with the existing vehicle storage available? Are there any issues / conflicts with the TH 62 intersection? 41 G:W� +rodGmaaRC SvaLS16200 Cdodal Wa,1Tmffic Revicw120100112_WSB_Churk_Ridmr The CoIM Re =.doe Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina January 11, 2010 Page 2 of 2 4. Electronic and hard copies of the Synchro / SimTraffic files should be provided to the City for review. 5. The Site should be shown on the Pedestrian Facilities, Bicycle Facilities and Transit maps. How does the site connect to these facilities? 6. The Traffic Generation numbers reported in the Executive Summary do not match those in Table 1 or the Conclusions. This should be clarified. Based on these comments and my review of the Traffic Impact Analysis, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. /pfd' PJLKEngineering • Landscape Architecture • Planning • Surveying • Traffic INCORPORATED Creating extraordinary \44� Communities MEMORANDUM TO: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer whoule@ci.edina.mn.us Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer jsullivan@ci.edina.mn.us COPY: Jay Jensen, Shelter Corporation jay@sheltercorp.com FROM: Katie Bruwelheide, P.E. kbruwelheide@rlkinc.com Vern Swing, P.E. vswing@rlkinc.com DATE: January 19'h, 2010 RE: Response to City Comments from 01 -11 -10 The Colony of Edina RLK Project No. 2009 -087 -L The following comments by the City of Edina, dated January 11, 2010, have been received and addressed by RLK. RLK's comments and actions are in italics after each comment. 1. The Trip Generation rates used in Table 1 were based on 189 occupied beds (95% occupancy) using the Assisted Living ITE rate category. The description of the proposed facility indicates that the facility will include 150 apartments ranging from independent living units, assisted living units and memory care units. What is the breakdown of each of these unit types? The independent living units will have a higher traffic generation. This should be outlined more clearly. A table with the breakdown of units has been added to page 8. The trip generation classification and traffic volumes have not been changed as the description of the Assisted Living Land Use (254), described in ITE's 8`h Edition of Trip Generation, encompasses all types of units proposed for this development. The Assisted Living Land Use descriptions states "the rooms in these facilities may be private or shared accommodations, consisting of either a single room or a small apartment -style unit with a kitchenette and living space". The proposed independent living units are considered to be apartment style units with kitchenettes and, therefore, considered to be within the Assisted Living Land Use. 2. No information is provided with respect to the interaction between the Colony Way and TH 62 Ramp intersections on Tracy Avenue. What is the lane geometry on Tracy Avenue between these intersections? With an existing ADT on Tracy Ave of 7,700, Offices: Duluth • Ham Lake • Hibbing • Minnetonka - Oakdale (952) 933-0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933-1153 Equal Opportunity Employer At 3 turn lanes at these intersections may be warranted, especially with an additional 500 + vehicles being added from the proposed site turning on to and off of Tracy Avenue. Less than 500 daily vehicle trips (less than 250 vehicles) are anticipated with the development of the site. Only 437 vehicle trips are expected on a daily basis per the trip generation estimates. Of these 437 vehicle trips, approximately 37% during the AM peak hour and 61 % during the PM peak hour are predicted to travel to /from the south (i.e. TH 62 Ramps) per Figure 4 in the TU With the existing ADT on Tracy Avenue and the addition of approximately 250 daily trips turning onto and off of Tracy Avenue at Colonial Way, turn lanes this intersection are not warranted. A more detailed discussion of LOS and queuing has been added to the results of existing and Build conditions. It is suggest that if northbound left turn operational and queuing problems arise in the future due to growth in background traffic, this portion of Tracy Avenue be re- striped by the City to provide a dedicated northbound left turn lane onto Colonial Way. 3. The analysis results indicate that all intersection will operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) on an overall basis. What about the turning vehicles, what is the left turn LOS at the Tracy Avenue intersections? The analysis also indicates that the 95% queue lengths are adequate. What are they? How do they compare with the existing vehicle storage available? Are there any issues / conflicts with the TH 62 intersection? Individual LOS and queuing results have been added to the results tables for both the Existing and Build conditions on pages 13 and 14. Discussion points have also been added after the results tables. No issues or conflicts are anticipated with the TH 62 intersection. 4. Electronic and hard copies of the Synchro / SimTraffic files should be ,provided to the City for review. Hard copies of the Synchro/SimTraffc results have been included in the appendix of the TIA. Electronic copies of the Synchro files are being sent with this response. 5. The Site should be shown on the Pedestrian Facilities, Bicycle Facilities and Transit maps. How does the site connect to these facilities? The site location has been shown of the Pedestrian Facilities, Bicycle Facilities and Transit maps. As stated in the TM on page 15, the proposed project will incorporate new sidewalks from the building to the existing sidewalk system on the south side of Colonial Way. 6. The Traffic Generation numbers reported in the Executive Summary do not match those in Table 1 or the Conclusions. This should be clarified. The traffic generation numbers in the Executive Summary have been updated to match those in Table I and the Conclusions. G:\Sheher Corporation\ 2009. 087- L \_Cortespondenw \TrafficUtmponso W City Comments 01- 18- 10.doc RLK Incorporated Page 2 of 2 January 19, 2010 The Colony of Edina Ali* 2009 -087 -M Pagel of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: IV. B. From: Jack Sullivan, PE ACTION: Assistant City Engineer ® Recommendation /Motion Date: January 21, 2010 ® Discussion Subject: Transportation ❑ Information Impact Analysis — 6200 Colonial Way — The Colony of Edina Revised Jan. 21, 2010 . Recommendation: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by RLK revised on January 19, 2010, review memo dated January 11, 2010 from WSB and Associates and response memo from RLK dated January 19, 2010. Staff and WSB have reviewed the response memo from RLK dated January 19, 2010 and believe the development team has met our requirement s. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the Transportation Study for 6200 Colonial Way does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: At the time this report was submitted to the Edina Transportation Commission there were a few outstanding items staff was requiring of the Development Team prior to making a recommendation. See the following italic text stating staffs recommendation as of January 15, 2010. Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by RLK dated November 9, 2009 and review a memo dated January 11, 2010 from WSB and Associates. Aj G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation CommissionWgendas\2010 R &R\20100121_6200_Colonial Way_Traffic_Study_REVISED.doc Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. B. Currently staff and our traffic consultant WSB feel that this transportation submittal is not yet complete. Staff, WSB and RLK are working to resolve the outstanding items listed in the attached memo prior to the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on January 21, 2010. Currently the conditions of the approval are: I. This development shall address all comments in WSB's January 21, 2010 memo to the satisfaction of the ETC and Engineering Department. Therefore staff is withholding a recommendation on this project pending the resolution of the outstanding issues. -------------------------------- The Staff received a proposal for a senior care facility with 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living and memory care on the site of an existing parking lot and vacant land located east of the Colonial Church on the south side of Colonial Way. The Development Team was required to analyze intersection operations at Tracy Ave. & Colonial Way, Tracy Ave. & Olinger Blvd. and Olinger Blvd. & Colonial Way. 0 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R&R\20100121_6200 Colonial _Way_Traffic_Study_REVISED.doe A, MINUTES OF THE � Edina Transportation Commission o e Thursday, January 21, 2010 Y. o Edina City Hall 40 �y 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Geof Workinger, Jennifer Janovy, Tom Bonneville, Jean Wh 0 Michael Schroeder, Julie Sierks = MEMBERS ABSENT: Warren Plante, Usha Abramovitz STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order II. Comments a. Chairman Comments b. Community Comments _ None. III. Approval of Minutes a. Regular'-'Meeting of,October 15, 200.9 and December 17, 2009 IV. New Business _ a THA- 94 Bren�Road Interchange °Presentation b The Colony of Edina — 6200 Colonial Way Assasaa_ nt city engineer Sullivan =said discussion began in 2009 on this 150 apartment (194 beds) development for th_e�:site located west of Tracy Avenue and north of the Crosstown (behind the; new fire station), The' te is currently being used as a parking lot by Colonial Church. He. said the developers were asked to study the intersections at Tracy Avenue & Olinger Blvd; -Tracy Avenue, &:.Colonial Way; and the area from the Crosstown entry/exit ramps up to Tracy Ave,rue, & Colonial Way. Mr. Sullivan said after review, it was determined that these locations would- continue to operate at level of service A & B. Additionally, Mr. Sullivan said the developers were asked to respond to six issues, all of which have been addressed satisfactorily. One of the issues included the stretch of road from Crosstown to Tracy Avenue. The concern was with cars stacking while waiting to make a left turn to go onto Colonial Way. It was determined that there would be enough gaps between vehicles to prevent stacking. However, should this become an issue in the future, Mr. Sullivan said Tracy Avenue is wide enough to accommodate a left turn lane. Mr. Jay Jensen with The Waters Senior Living, Minnetonka, MN, spoke on behalf of the development team. He explained that a similar development was done in Eden Prairie with Al underground parking of 70 stalls, most of which are empty. With an average age of 86, Mr. Jensen said majority of the residents are no longer driving. He said the Edina site will have 100 underground parking stalls for residents and employees with 80 surface parking spots. He said traffic generation will be minimal and will be mostly from visitors in off -peak hours. He said the facility will have a van to take residents on day trips, and a couple cars to drive them to appointments. In regards to the church losing a parking lot, Mr. Jensen said a parking study was conducted and the church will continue to have sufficient parking for Sunday services, plus a cross easement will be established so that they can use the 80 surface parking spots. Additionally, Mr. Jensen said they will offer incentive for the 75 employees to--6se public transit (the area is served by two buses with a park and ride conveniently located," - ss the street). After discussion, Commissioner Bonneville motione.d`to accept: staffs recommendation as follow and the motion was seconded by Commissioner White. "if so desired by the Transportation:'.`".-,Commission, adopt'.' a motion recommending that the - trafficfor 6200 Colonial Way does not adversely affect the adjacent �transporta Dh- system." At Commissioner Janovy's recommendation `Transpoi#ationi Study" was struck from the motion and replaced with "traffic." All voted aye. Motion passed. _ c. Transportation_- .,Coommission Role Jn'-`DeveldO --- q�pnt Review d. Small Arei Planning Process'P�esentation. V. Planning Commission Update ( Commissoner Schroeder) VI. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Comrrmissioner Janovy) VII. Staff Liaison Comments a: Southwest,Transitway Route 3A b. NTMP Deadline VIII. Adjournment. 2 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Karen [edinamama2 @aol.com] Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 5:38 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker We have no objections to Colonial Churches plann for asst living. Think it is a great idea. Ted and Karen Olson 6120 Westridge Blvd 1/19/2010 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Tim Robb [tgrobb @yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 6:45 PM Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: The waters addition of Edina We are strongly opposed to the building of any large commercial structure in our neighborhood. It seems as if the Comprehensive Guide Plan means nothing in Edina. It seems like every time someone with a little more money than the next guy comes along and promises more tax revenue, Edina is more than willing to bend over backward to change the comp. plan. All in the name of tax revenue. If you need more tax dollars to keep the city running you have to either charge more to the residential population or cut services in the city. We would be happy to accept the higher taxes or a cut in services, if that would keep Edina from turning into Plymouth or Eden Prairie!! There is a good reason why Edina was laid out the way in was more than 50 years ago. It seems as if population compression is a popular city planning tool nowadays, and a great revenue enhancer. But, that is not why we moved here, we left Minneapolis to have a little more space. The other major problem is the whole Tracey Ave 62 interchange. Sometimes right now it can take 5 mins to cross Tracey to go West bound on 62. Mainly because there is no enforcement of the stop signs and speed limits on Tracey. I have never in 7 years of living here seen a EPD cop car running traffic out there. What is going to happen when you add 150 residents and 150 workers to that complex of roads. You are going to have to address that FIRST, the infrastructure is going to have to be changed to accommodate more peak traffic. And who will pay for that ............. conclusion, we are opposed to this change in the comp plan. This whole area. should remain as R1 zoning. There are plenty of empty commercial buildings just a few miles west of this location that don't need rezoning to make this work. Again, if it is a revenue issue either cut services or raise taxes, don't sell us out for more tax revenue and inconvenience in our daily lives. Thanks, Tim Robb 6221 Hillside Road 1/19/2010 from: Carol and Ben McPheeters 5525 Hansen Rd. #211, Edina MN 55436 January 19, 2010 Re: your meeting on Wednesday, January 27th concerning The Waters Senior Living To Edina Planning Commission— Commissioner Patrick Schnettler We are like many Edina seniors who chose this community to raise our children, for its excellent schools, churches, variety of shopping, available recreational facilities, medical care and others. We also hope to continue to enjoy Edina's amenities when the time comes for a move to a place for assisted living or for necessary physical care. With the building of The Waters Senior Living, near the Crosstown 62 and Tracy Avenue, that opportunity opens up. The rental prices are affordable. Its location in central Edina and the careful planning of the available resources to residents is an attractive choice for us. Sincerely, Carol and Ben McPheeters Jackie Hoogenakker From: tedspringer @aol.com Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:10 PM Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Hearing on THE WATERS complex To: Edina Planning Department From: Nancy and Ted Springer Dear Planners... As long -time residents of Edina (over 40 years) we just wanted to express our enthusiastic approval of the proposed senior assisted living facility. We have lived in the neighborhood for many years - -our family home of 30 years was on Jeff Place and we have lived in Nine Mile Village for some 12 years: Thus the prospect of continuing to live in the same neighborhood as tenants at The Waters is hugely exciting for us. Edina can be proud to offer such a well - planned facility as our Village population (and that of the country in general) ages. It is a supportive and conscientious response to this need. Thanks for whatever you can do to help make the project a reality. Sincerely, Nancy and Ted Springer 6300 Pheasant Ct. Edina, MN 55436 , 0 '\C) C) 1/21/2010 Clyde O. Hanson 6240 Oriole Lane Edina, MN 55436 9a-A (M)925 -3159 /V o 1711 a. �t arE., 4r �A, J d44, 77uta, AvvL� City of Edina Planning Department 1/19/2010 4980150th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Colonial Church of Edina/Waters Senior Living Dear Planning Department, I have two serious concerns about the proposed 150 unit senior living center. 1) The traffic on Tracy Avenue at present is heavy. Exiting highway 62, from east or west, onto Tracy is a hazardous and dangerous experience. Because of the cement bridge siding it is difficult to see cross traffic until it is almost in front of you; this would be on a normal day. On days when Colonial church services have ended the traffic is much worse. Getting on to Tracy from Hillside Road is.also difficult. A new senior center can only make the traffic heavier. 2) This area is a nice residential area but it is starting to look like a commercial area. I'm glad we have a new fire station but it is very large, not especially a beautiful building and it is very bright. There are three churches within a very small area adding to the commercial feeling in the area. A new senior living facility will only add to the feeling of commerce in this area. I am opposed to the approval of this proposed project. Yours truly, pencer A. Turner 6208 Hillside Road Edina, Mn. 55436 e -mail: sturnerl2 @comcast.net Jackie Hoogenakker From: Paul Axt [paxt @earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 9:04 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: 'William Melin' Subject: Case File: 2010 - 0001 -10a Dear Ms. Hoogenaker: I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposal for construction of The Waters senior assisted living facility on Colonial Church property located at 6200 Colonial Way, Edina. A building of such nature is grossly inconsistent with the single family homes that currently make up the surrounding neighborhoods. Construction of the facility will only serve to decrease the values of residential properties within close proximity to the proposed site due to the certain and significant increase of motor vehicle traffic to and from the site, and the perception of "commercializing" the neighborhood. I am particularly concerned about the increased flow of traffic on my street, Olinger Boulevard (and on Tracy Avenue), which would undoubtedly diminish the value of all homes on and immediately adjacent to Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue between Vernon Avenue and Hwy 62. Olinger Boulevard is already a busy street, as it commonly serves as a "cut through" from Vernon Avenue to Hwy 62. The addition of 150 (and potentially 300) new residents will increase the volume of traffic on Olinger Boulevard every day as construction workers, facility employees and visitors enter and leave the facility. Also, the intersection at Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and the exit ramp to Tracy from westbound Hwy 62 is already dangerous (impaired sight lines) and overly congested, especially during morning and afternoon commutes. Constructing the facility at the proposed site will greatly increase traffic at the intersection making it even more difficult for vehicles to access Tracy Avenue from the highway off ramp and Valley View Road. Before voting on the proposal, and at the very least, I would like the Developer to conduct a comprehensive traffic study on both Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue between Vernon Avenue and Hwy 62, which includes a statistically significant analysis of current traffic volume and an estimation of the anticipated increases in motor vehicle traffic resulting from building on the proposed site. The traffic study should be distributed to ALL residents on and adjacent to Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue between Vernon Avenue and Hwy 62. Lastly, I feel strongly that ALL residents on Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard between Vernon Avenue and Hwy 62 should be given formal notice of the Developer's proposal as ALL would be directly impacted by the increased flow of traffic to and from the proposed site. Limiting the notification to only those residents within 1000 feet of the proposed site might be the law, but does a serious disservice to other taxpaying residents who are guaranteed to be adversely affected if the proposal is approved by the City. I respectfully ask the City of Edina to deny the developer's request. Thank you, Paul Axt 6109 Olinger Boulevard Edina, MN 55436 952 -925 -1440 . 1/26/2010 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55224 January 25, 2010 Re: Colonial Church Proposal Case File: 2010 - 0001 -10a Dear Persons, I write in strong opposition to the above referenced proposal specifically because the proposed height is too tall for the surrounding neighborhood. The project proposes a 4 story building which is twice the height of any other housing in the immediate surrounding area. Taller than many trees, a building of this size will loom over the surrounding neighborhood and significantly degrade its semi -rural nature. While neighbors have been provided with artists' renditions of the proposed building, they do not accurately portray its height relative to other surrounding physical structures, making the building seem smaller than it actually will be. A four story building will be as high as the steeple on the Colonial Church, which is fine for a church steeple, not a building hundreds of feet long in this neighborhood. An urban sized 4 story building contrasts too strongly with the quiet peacefulness of the surrounding area and the adjacent Bredesen Park. Not only is height itself a serious concern, light coming from such a large building and the surrounding grounds at night will contrast greatly with the less brightly lit neighborhood. The sky in the direction of the complex will be clearly lit up. Light, visible at great distance, will destroy the peaceful sense one feels upon coming home in the evening. This will be perceived as a great nuisance to those accustom to the quiet, darkened and peaceful environment the neighbors of Colonial Church currently enjoy. In summary I oppose approval of the project because of its adverse impact on the visual environment of the neighborhood and the quiet enjoyment of such citizens currently enjoy. Sincerely, Lawrence J. Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place Edina MN 55436 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Roger Bentley [rogerreesbentley @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:35 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed construction by Colonial Church I will not be able to attend this evening's hearing, but I wanted to voice my opposition to the plan. In a word, traffic. Traffic at the intersection of Tracy Ave and Valley View road is already quite congested and often dangerous, with traffic entering and exiting Rt. 62. In the morning and evening, traffic often backs up 8 to 10 cars, creating a safety hazard. Adding 150 units, plus support staff using that intersection would significantly add to that congestion, creating a safety hazard. Further the proximity to the fire station with the increased congestion could exacerbate the problem. One hundred and fifty units is simply too large. I would not be opposed to a smaller plan of under 50 units. That way we could access impact and possibly consider additional units at a later date. Roger and ]an Bentley 6338 Valley View Road Edina Your E -mail and More On- the -Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now. 1/27/2010 February 9, 2010 EDINA CITY COUNCIL RE: Colonial Church Development City Hall 4801 W 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council, Recently I moved to Nine Mile Village, which is adjacent to Colonial Church in Edina. While I welcome the Church as a neighbor, I am concerned about the size of their Preliminary Development Plan for senior assisted living. A four story building, with 150 units in a small space, is simply oversized in height and density for this part of Edina. This is a residential area, and one of the reasons I moved here was the village atmosphere. A very large four story building overwhelms all other structures and renders your current zoning code as meaningless. I suggest that the city explore methods to reduce the size and height of this proposal so that it is more in harmony with the community history and residential zoning in the area. Sincerely, Peter P Bundy 6344 Pheasant Ct. Edina, MN 55436 <cc: Nine Mile Village Board Edina Planning Dept. Jackie Hoogenakker From: FranzSr @aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 3:17 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Colonial Church senior assisted living facility To: Edina City Council As an Edina resident for 64 years and a property owner located within 1000 feet of the proposed Colonial Church 150 unit senior assisted living facility, I must voice my extreme displeasure with and objection to the proposed plan. Our neighborhood is blessed with a marvelous playground and park, a modern fire hall, and two very quiet churches. All of which offer wonderful benefits to the immediate neighborhood, and at the same time, attract many users from the western suburbs. Adding this proposed facility will bring hundreds of people to our neighborhood on a daily basis. Two years ago we voted to preserve our lakes and ponds and natural environment with our tax dollars. The City of Edina has taken the conservation path for many years and is an example to other suburbs. The rezoning and construction will be disruptive and the proposed end result will be beneficial only to a very small minority. I imagine there will be a financial gain to the church and other individuals at our expense, as well. This is unacceptable to me and all of my neighbors. There remains plenty of properly zoned space available at Southdale. In your Project (Propject) description, you mention construction of a facility on the vacant portion of the church site. The site is not vacant. Hundreds of trees, many deer, and other animals inhabit the vacant site. If this construction is approved, we will no doubt see more natural areas deleted in favor of condos, high rise apartments, etc. We elected you folks to represent the majority interests in Edina. The majority of residents in this area oppose this construction. Please act responsibly and preserve our wonderful community. Franz and Joanie Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Edina 55436 952 920 1529 2/8/2010 Page 1 of 2 Cary Teague From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 10:54 AM To: 'STURNER12 @comcast.net' Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: rezoning for Colonial Church of Edina Spencer, State law requires notification for rezoning proposals to be 350 feet. (See statute below). Several years ago, the Edina City Council determined that 350 feet is not adequate, and therefore, expanded the notification area to 1,000 feet. Additionally, state law requires one public hearing to be held. Edina requires two public hearings, one at the Planning Commission and one at the City Council. Therefore, residents within 1,000 feet of a project are notified about projects twice. Cary Teague, AICP Planning Director City of Edina Phone: (952) 826 -0460 Fax: (952) 826 -0389 cteag-Lie@ci.edina.nui.us 462.357 OFFICIAL CONTROLS: ZONING ORDINANCE. Subd. 3. Public hearings. No zoning ordinance or amendment thereto shall be adopted until a public hearing has been held thereon by the planning agency or by the governing body. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the municipality at least ten days prior to the day of the hearing. When an amendment involves changes in district boundaries affecting an area of five acres or less, a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten days before the day of the hearing to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the amendment relates. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be made a part of the records of the proceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this subdivision has been made. From: Spence Turner [mailto:STURNERI2 @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 4:05 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: rezoning for Colonial Church of Edina I have already expressed my concerns in a letter sent to the Edina Planning Department dated January 2/8/2010 Page 2 of 2 ' 19. I'm curious as to why only residents living within 1,000 feet (about 3 blocks) are the only ones notified of the hearing on February 16. This proposed rezoning affects many more residents than that. Your reply will be appreciated. Thank you. Spencer Turner 6208 Hillside Rd sturner12CcDcomcast.net 2/8/2010 Jackie Hoogenakker From: suckowziemer @comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:58 PM Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010 - 0001 -10a Hello: We are writing to share comments (if it's not too late) about the proposed senior assisted living facility at 6200 Colonial Way in Edina (case file 2010 - 0001 -10a. We are residents at 5900 Olinger Blvd. in Edina. We are generally supportive of the proposed facility, and also support increased density in the neighborhood. Our concerns are related to the increase in traffic (due to staff, volunteers and family who will access the facility) at Tracy Avenue and the exit/entrance ramp to Hwy. 62. During peak traffic hours and occasionally other times, it can be very difficult to turn left on to Tracy Avenue from the exit ramp at Hwy. 62. We wonder what the city will do to mitigate that should the new facility increase traffic at the intersection. In addition, we would encourage the city to add pedestrian lighting to Tracy Avenue and Olinger Blvd. to improve safety of pedestrians given there is likely to be increased traffic on these main street routes to Colonial Way and the new facility. The sidewalks on Tracy and Olinger are used to access Countryside Park and Bredesen, but are very dark, with only occassionally street lights at intersections. Given the increase in traffic to the facility, it would help to have.improved lighting (primarily for pedestrians but also street lighting) to improve safety for pedestrians and drivers. .ink you. Holly Ziemer and Steve Suckow nininn -4 n Jackie Hoogenakker From:- - Gordon V Johnson [gordon.johnsonl @cox.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 12:18 AM 1: Jackie Hoogenakker .:c: 'Dot Kerzner' Subject: FW: February 16th Hearing - Colonial Church - - --- Original Message---- - From: Gordon V Johnson [mailto:gordon.johnsonl @cox.net] Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:09 PM To: 'Jacquie Hoogenakker' Cc: 'Dot Kerzner' Subject: February 16th Hearing - Colonial Church Jackie: 0 0;�) I am in Arizona so I will be unable to attend the February 16th council meeting to comment on the Colonial Church application. Accordingly, I offer the following comments via this e-mail: Although the Planning Commission apparently didn't feel so, I am still of the opinion that 150 units and 4 stories is too much building for the neighborhood. The number of units being proposed by Waters Senior Living is driven solely by their opinion that anything less than 150 units is not profitable for them. The City of Edina in reviewing zoning proposals has never been driven by the profitability factor, but by (a) is the proposal consistent with the zoning plan? And (b) is the proposal consistent with the character and symmetry of the neighborhood? I continue to believe that it is not. 2. 1 believe that the Planning Commission misunderstood my position regarding the need for a proof of parking agreement between and among the developer, the Colonial Church and the City of Edina. The Commission membership appears to be relatively new and probably has not encountered proof of parking issues to the extent that we faced them from the 1970's into the 1990's. I heard one Commissioner state that he didn't see the need for such an agreement when it appeared to him that the development would be well within the required parking spaces. The intent of my comment was not directed toward the development itself, but toward Colonial Church. When the church was in its early years on Colonial Way, the attendees often overflowed its north parking lot and spilled out onto Colonial Way, Olinger Boulevard and in some cases, even on Jeff Place. That is one of the reasons the south parking lot was developed. At the present time, it is my understanding that church membership is less than in prior years, but there is no assurance that it will always remain low and the need for parking will increase. A recent funeral at the church (without any concurrent event) dramatically overran the available parking, including the south lot which is scheduled to be abandoned to the developer by the church. It is also my opinion that the present parking ordinance is outdated when it requires only one parking space for every three seats in the sanctuary. Today, most churches have concurrent activities and the need for parking often exceeds that which is covered by the ordinance, i.e., the three seats for each parking space. A proof of parking agreement including the church is a way to "protect" the neighborhood and the City against excessive parking usage down the road. Once the property is rezoned, the City has no opportunity to come back and ask for more parking from the church. If the need for more parking is never needed, then the agreement remains dormant and is unused. The agreement also eliminates the need to develop and build additional parking prior to the time that it may be needed, thus preserving as much green space as possible in the interim period of time. I see no downside to the City making a proof of parking agreement a integral part of any development agreement. However, I do see a lot of upside benefit to the city. 3. I do not desire to hold this development "hostage" for the traffic on Tracy Avenue. However, this project will add to the present traffic issues. The developer's traffic study was conducted in August when the high school is not in session and many people were on 2/16/2010 vacation. In addition to the visitors to the facility, the Crosstown 62 /Tracy intersection will be burdened by trucks during construction and by large delivery trucks servicing the development on a regular basis thereafter. The Crosstown/Tracy intersection is already a difficult intersection for vehicles exiting the Crosstown hnd planning to turn north onto Tracy Avenue or continue east on Valley View Road. The intersection services a large part of western Edina including Colonial Church, Jehovah's Witnesses Church, Countryside Park and, even Normandale Lutheran Church since it is the most direct route for various church members living west of T: and/or south of the Crosstown. Traffic passes through the intersection at speeds greater than the posted 30 miles per hour on a regular basis. It is only a matter of time before some vehicle gets "t- boned" at that intersection. You should consider a stop sign on Tracy at the Colonial Way entrance or stop lights at the Crosstown itself. Let's not make a bad situation worse without some serious thought about the traffic on Tracy. 4. The interplay of traffic on Colonial Way (whether the development or the church) between these parties and the vehicles delivering children to the park for baseball and other activities needs to be carefully considered from a safety standpoint. Jackie, it would be appreciated if you would place copies of this e-mail before the Mayor, the Council and the City Manager before Tuesday evening's council meeting. I am sending a duplicate copy of this e-mail to Mrs. Dot Kerzner whom I believe will be present at the council meeting to present her own point of view on these issues. I can be reached by e-mail if anyone has further questions of me. Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 2/16/2010 Jackie Hoogenakker From:. sfanleybn @aol.com Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 6:28 PM 1: Jackie Hoogenakker . c: Campiander @aol.com Subject: Case File 20110-0001-1a Colonial Church Senior Assisted Living Facility As adjacent property owners we received the February 6, 2010 notie in regard to the above subject proposed Senior Assisted Living Facility. In principal, we do not object to this proposal, except for two items,(1) the lack of a good site plan that will show exactly where the new structure will be located vs the existing church and (2) it is impossible to judge the appearance of a four story building in our residential setting without some kind of visual representation. ' Until these two items are addressed my wife and I cannot be in favor of this project. Hopefully, your staff could create an animated visual to give a better understanding of the building's appearance. I have copied the president of our homeowners association (Nine Mlle Village) so that she is aware of our concerns. Thank you. Stanley & Joan Nickells 6360 Red Fox Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 925 -7505 2/16/2010 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55224 February 13, 2010 Re: Colonial Church Proposal Case File: 2010- 0001 -10a Dear City Council Members, I write in strong opposition to the above referenced proposal specifically because the proposed height is too tall for the surrounding neighborhood. The project proposes a four story building which is twice the height of any other housing in the immediate surrounding area. Taller than many trees, a building of this size will loom over the surrounding neighborhood and significantly degrade its semi -rural nature. While neighbors have been provided with artists' renditions of the proposed building, these drawings do not accurately portray the building's height relative to other surrounding physical structures making it seem smaller than it actually will be. A four story building will be at least as high as the bell tower on the Colonial Church, which is fine for a church steeple, not for a building hundreds of feet long in this neighborhood. An urban sized four story building contrasts too strongly with the quiet peacefulness of the surrounding area and the adjacent Bredesen Park. The presence of this building will in my opinion also seriously degrade the park like visual space on the adjacent highway 62 and serve to extend the very urban, downtown like feel of the 62 - France Avenue interchange to this, more peaceful area. Not only is height itself a serious concern, light coming from such a large building and the surrounding grounds at night will contrast greatly with the less brightly lit neighborhood. The sky in the direction of the complex will be clearly lit up. Light, visible at great distance will destroy the peaceful sense one feels upon coming home in the evening. This will be perceived as a great nuisance to those accustom to the quiet darkened and peaceful environment the neighbors of Colonial Church currently enjoy. I am also concerned about street traffic and understand an updated traffic study was to be completed to analyze patterns during the months when school is in session. Has that analysis been completed and opened for public discussion? In summary I oppose approval of the project because of its adverse impact on the visual esthetic of the neighborhood and the quiet enjoyment of such citizens currently enjoy. Sincerely, Lawrence J. Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place Edina MN 55436 NI ,,,,� � REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II.C. From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: February 16, 2010 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Public Hearing to Action ❑ Motion Issue G.O. CIP Bonds Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Hold public hearing and adopt Resolution 2010 -24 giving preliminary approval for the issuance of General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds in an amount not to exceed $9,500,000 and adopting the City of Edina Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan for 2010 through 2014 under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521. Info /Background: The City of Edina financed the construction of the City Hall/ Police Facility in 2002 using non - general obligation public project revenue bonds where the Housing Redevelopment Authority purchased, constructed and financed the City Hall /Police facility and leases to the .City of Edina under an annual appropriation lease agreement. In 2003 the Minnesota State Legislature adopted a statute (Section 475.521 the "CIP Act ") that allows cities to issue municipal bonds under a specific type of capital improvement plan without the usual referendum requirement. The City of Edina has used the CIP Act to finance, the new Fire Station and the first phase of the Public Works Facility and probably would have used it to finance the City Hall /Police. Facility if it were available at the time. With the low interest rates environment, the 2002 bonds are refundable and the City could choose to refinance them again as non - general obligation public project revenue bonds or use the CIP Act and refinance as general obligation bonds improving the expected interest rate on the potential refunding bonds. Under the CIP Act the City would call for a hearing, place a notice of public hearing in the Sun Current, hold the public hearing,. allow for 30 days for a petition equal to at least 5 percent of votes cast in the last general election requesting a vote, and if no petition, call for the sale of bonds when the time is right., The hearing was called for at the January 19 Council meeting and the notice was published in the January 28 Edina Sun Current. The difference between the two refinancing methods is estimated to be a present value savings of about $120,000 more if the bonds are refunded using the CIP Act over the public project revenue bond. City Staff and the City's Financial Advisor Ehlers & Associates will review the timing for refunding the 2002 bonds following the conclusion of the hearing and the 30 day petition period. ..RESOLUTION 2010 -24 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTYL'AN BONDS,IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED . $9,500,000 AND. ADOPTING: THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 2010 THROUGH 2014 UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 475.521 A. WHEREAS, the City Council of,the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") proposes to adopt the City of Edina, Minnesota, Capital Improvement Plan (the "Plan") and to issue its general obligation capital improvement plan bonds (the ".Bonds ") described in the Plan and B. WHEREAS, the City has caused notice of the..public hearing on the intention to issue the Bonds, and on the proposed adoption of the Plan to be published pursuant to ,and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521; and ; C. WHEREAS, a public hearing on the intention to issue the Bonds and on the proposed Plan has been held on this date, following published notice of the public hearing as required by law; and D. WHEREAS; in approving the Plan, the City Council considered for each project and for the overall Plan: 1. The condition of the City's existing infrastructure, including the projected need for repair and replacement; 2. The. likely demand for the improvement; 3. The estimated cost of the improvement; 4. The available public resources; 5. The level of overlapping debt in the City; 6. The relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of the funds; 7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements; and 8. Alternatives for providing services more efficiently through shared facilities with other local governmental units; and E. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the issuance of the Bonds will result in overall lower tax levies for the City and is the best way to finance the capital improvements described in the Plan as authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The amended Plan is hereby in all respects approved. 2. The staff and consultants of the City are hereby authorized to do all other things and take all other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to ' carry out the Plan in accordance with any applicable laws and regulations. 3. The City gives preliminary approval to issuance of the Bonds in the maximum principal amount of $9,500,000, provided that if a petition requesting a vote on issuance of the Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the City in the last general election, is filed with City Clerk by March 18, 2010, the City may issue the Bonds only after obtaining approval of a majority of voters voting on the question at an election. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 16'h day of February, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 16, 2010 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ 2010 through 2014 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Capital Improvement Plan Financing Purposes January 19, 2010 Prepared by: City of Edina Staff and Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... ............................... 3 H. PURPOSE ............................................................... ..............................4 III. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING PROCESS .............5 IV. PROJECT SUMMARY .......................................... ..............................6 V. FINANCING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ....................10 City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes . Page 2 City of Edina Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan 2010 through 2014 I. INTRODUCTION In 2003, the Minnesota State Legislature adopted a statute (Section 475.521, referred to herein as the "CIP Act ") that allows cities to issue municipal bonds under a specific type of capital improvement plan without the usual referendum requirement (except for the so- called "reverse referendum" described below). The CIP Act applies to capital improvements consisting of city halls, public works, and public safety facilities. The 2005 Legislature added towns to the meaning of a municipality and town halls and libraries to the meaning of a capital improvement under the CIP Act. In 2007, the City issued $5,910,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds to finance a new City fire station under the CIP Act. In 2009, the City issued $14,000,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds to finance a new City public works building under the CIP Act. This capital improvement plan is intended to supersede the previous plans for the City fire station and public works facility. Throughout this plan, the term "capital improvement" refers only to those improvements identified in the CIP Act, as summarized above. Capital expenditures for other public improvements in the City will be financed through other. means and are described in a separate capital improvement plan also adopted by the City Council, and are not governed by this plan. H. PURPOSE A capital improvement is a major expenditure of municipal funds for the acquisition or betterment to public lands, buildings, or other improvements used as a city hall, town hall, library, public safety, or public works facility, which has a useful life of 5 years or more. For the purposes of the CIP Act, capital improvements do not include light rail transit or related activities, parks, roadibridges, administrative buildings other than city or town hall, or City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 3 land for those facilities. In meeting the requirements of the State "CIP Act ", the Capital Improvement Plan ( "CIP ") is a document designed to anticipate capital improvement expenditures and schedule them over a five -year period so that they may be purchased in the most efficient and cost effective method possible. A CEP allows the matching of expenditures with anticipated income. As potential expenditures are reviewed, the municipality considers the benefits, costs, alternatives and impact on operating expenditures. The City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") believes the capital improvement process is an important element of responsible fiscal management. Major capital expenditures can be anticipated and coordinated so as to minimize potentially adverse financial impacts caused by the timing and magnitude of capital outlays. This coordination of capital expenditures is important to the City in achieving its goals of adequate physical assets and sound fiscal management. In these financially difficult times good planning is essential for the wise use of limited financial resources. III. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING PROCESS The process begins with analysis of the City's five -year capital improvement needs and funding sources. The City may solicit input from citizens and other governmental units at an early stage, if desired. The City Council then directs staff or consultants to prepare a plan that sets forth the estimated schedule, timing and details of specific capital improvements by year, together with the estimated cost, the need for the improvement, and the sources of revenue for the improvement. The City Council then holds a public hearing on the CIP, with notice published not more than 30 days and not less than seven days for the hearing (except as described below). The Council may either approve the CIP immediately after the hearing, or based on input may make revisions and approve the CIP at a later meeting. If the CIP calls for general obligation bonds to finance certain improvements, the City Council must follow an additional set of procedures. The Council must hold a public hearing regarding issuance of the bonds. Notice of such hearing must be published in the official newspaper of the municipality at least 14, but not more than 28 days prior to the date of the public hearing. In addition, the notice may be posted on the City's official web site. (The public hearings on the CIP and the bonds may be combined City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 4 into a single hearing, in which case the notice requirements for bonds must be followed.) The Council must approve the sale of CIP bonds by a 3 /5ths vote of its membership. However, the bonds .are subject to a so- called "reverse referendum ": if a petition signed by voters equal to at least five percent of the votes cast in the City in the last general election is filed with the City Clerk within 30 days after the public hearing regarding the bonds, the bonds may not be issued unless approved by the voters (by a majority of those voting on the question). Further, the maximum debt service in any year on all outstanding CIP Bonds is 0.16% of the taxable market value of property in the city, using the market value for the taxes- payable year in which the bonds are issued. After the CIP has been approved and bonds have been authorized, the City works with its financial advisor to prepare a bond sale and repayment schedule. Assuming no petition for a referendum is filed, the bonds are sold, and when proceeds from the sale of the bonds (and any other identified revenue sources) become available, the expenditures for specified capital improvements can be made. In subsequent years, the process is repeated as expenditures are completed and as new needs arise. Capital improvement planning looks five or more years into the future from the date of the CIP. N. PROJECT SUMMARY The only capital improvement contemplated in the five -year period of this plan (2010 through 2014) is the acquisition of the City's existing public City Hall /police facility,, constructed in 2002 (the `Building "). The acquisition will occur through the City's issuance of refunding bonds (referred to as the "CIP Bonds "). The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( "HRA ") issued its $12,410,000 Public Project Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 (the "Series 2002 Bonds ") to finance construction of the public safety building. The City leases the Building from the HRA, paying lease payments equal to debt service on the Series 2002 Bonds. The City has now determined to exercise its purchase option under the lease agreement with the HRA in order to acquire fee title to the Building and refund the Series 2002 Bonds. The City proposes to finance the acquisition through issuance of CIP Bonds under the CIP Act and this CIP. The City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 5 proposed CEP Bonds would be issued sometime in the next five years, in a principal amount not to exceed $9,500,000. The CIP Bonds may be issued in one or more series. The call date on the Series 2002 Bonds is on 2/1/2012. The CIP Act requires the City Council to consider eight factors in preparing the CIP: 1. Condition of the City's existing infrastructure, including projected need for repair or replacement. 2. Likely demand for the improvement. 3. Estimated cost of the improvement. 4. Available public resources. 5. Level of overlapping debt in the City. 6. Relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of funds. 7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements. 8. Alternatives for providing services most efficiently through shared facilities with other cities or local governments. The City has considered the eight points as they relate to acquisition of the Building through issuance of refunding bonds. The findings are as follows: Conditions of City Infrastructure and Need for the Projects The Building currently exists, but the City has determined that it is financially prudent to acquire those facilities from the HRA. Other than such acquisition, the City does not anticipate further repair or replacement of the Building in the 2010 through 2014 period. Demand for Projects As noted above, the Building currently exists. Acquisition of the existing leased facilities is prudent in order to reduce City borrowing costs. Estimated Cost of the Projects By issuing CIP Bonds that will refund the Series 2002 Bonds, the City expects to achieve a net present value savings of at least 3% of refunded principal, as well as eliminate the need for a reserve fund. Availability of Public Resources City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 6 The CIP Bonds for acquisition of the Building would be paid with ad valorem taxes, as are the lease payments that currently secure the Series 2002 Bonds. However, the CIP Bonds will be additionally secured by the City's full faith and credit, which is expected to produce lower interest rates on the CIP Bonds compared to the Series 2002 Bonds. Level of Overlapping Debt Issuance of the CIP Bonds is not expected to affect the City's overall debt in any significant way, other than through lowering debt service costs. Relative Costs and Benefits of Alternative Uses of the Funds Refunding of the Series 2002 Bonds is expected to produce cost savings, which may free up revenues for alternative uses. Operating Costs of the Proposed Improvements The proposed refunding of the Series 2002 Bonds would reduce operating costs of the Building, to the extent current lease payments are converted to lower CIP Bond debt service payments. In other respects, no changes to operating costs are expected under this CIP. Options for Shared Facilities with Other Cities or Local Government Sharing the Building with another community is not an option since the provision of public safety services relies on immediate response times in emergencies and having a shared facility outside of the community would seriously jeopardize response times and public safety. In addition, all of the surrounding communities have their own police forces. V. FINANCING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The total principal amount of requested expenditures under this Capital Improvement Plan is $9,500,000. This amount represents the maximum principal amount of CIP Bonds that may be issued to refund the Series 2002 Bonds. Principal and interest on the CIP Bonds will be paid through a tax levy over the term of the CIP Bonds, further described in Appendix A. In the financing of the Capital Improvement Plan, two significant statutory limitations apply. City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 7 1. Under Chapter 475, with few exceptions, municipalities cannot incur debt in excess of 3% of the assessor's taxable market value for ,the municipality. In the City, the taxable market value is $10,079,498,900. Therefore, the total principal amount of outstanding debt cannot exceed $302,384,967 (These values are for 2008/09 tax year). As of December 31, 2009, the City has $46,670,000 subject to the legal debt limit (this amount includes the Series 2002 Bonds that are expected to be refunded under this amendment to the CIP). As such, issuance of the refunding CIP Bonds will be well within the overall statutory debt limit for the City. 2. A separate limitation under the CIP Act is that, without referendum, the total amount of principal and interest in any one year on all CIP Bonds issued by the City cannot exceed 0.16% of the total taxable market value in the municipality. In the City, that maximum annual debt service amount is $162127,198 for the 2008/09 tax year ($10,079,498,900 x .0016). The annual principal and interest payments on the CIP Bonds proposed to be issued under this CIP plus the existing G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds will average approximately $2,855,958. As such, debt service on the CIP Bonds will be well within the annual limits under the CIP Act. General principal payments, term and debt payments if the CIP Bonds were issued in 2010 and in one series are shown in Appendix A. The form of the public hearing notice and resolution approving the CIP are shown in Appendix B. Continuation of the Capital Improvement Plan This Capital Improvement Plan should be reviewed annually by the City Council using the process outlined in this Plan. It should review proposed expenditures, make priority decisions, and seek funding for those expenditures it deems necessary for the City. If deemed appropriate, the Council should prepare an update to this Plan. City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 8 APPENDIX A PROPOSED CIP BOND ISSUE — AMOUNT OF ISSUE SIZE AND ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE WILL VARY: Edina HRA, MN $9,315,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 (Proposed Net Cash Refunding of $12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total 02/01/2010 - - - " 08/0112010 - - 87,930.00 87,930.00 - 02/O1/2011 790,000.00 0.500% 87,930.00 877,930.00 965,860.00 08/01/2011 - - 85,955.00 85,955.00 - 02/012012 795 000.00 0.750% 85,955.00 _ 880,955.00 966,910.00 08/012012 - - 82,973.75 82,973.75 - 02/012013 805,000.00 LOW% 82,973.75 887,973.75 970,947.50 08/012013 - 78,948.75 78,948.75 - 02/012014 810,000.00 1.300% 78,948.75 888,948.75 967,897.50 08/012014 73,683.75 7368375 - 02/012015 820,000.00 1.700% 73,683.75 893,683.75 967,367.50 08/012015 - - 66,713.75 66,713.75 - 02/012016 830,000.00 1.950% 66,713.75 896,713.75 963,427.50 08/01/2016 - - 58,621.25 58,621.25 - 02/012017 8501000 00 2.230% 58,621.25 908,621.25 967,242.50- 08/012017 - - 49,143.75 49,143.75 - 02/012018 870,000.00 2.450% 49,143.75 919,143.75 968,287.50 08/012018 - - 38,486.25 38,486.25 - 02/012019 890,000.00 2.550% 38,486.25 928,486.25 966,972.50 08/01/2019 ... 27,138.75 _ - 02/O1/2020 915,000.00 _ 2.850% 27,138.75 942,138.75 969,277.50 08/012020 - - 14,100.00 14,100.00 - 02/012021 940,000.00 3.000% 14,100.00 954,100.00 968,200.00 Total 59,315,000.00 S1 ,327,390.00 510,642,390.00 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars _ _ 557,525.00 Average We - -- _____ 6.176 Years - Ave a Cou on 2.3075011 Net Interest Cost (NIC) _ 2.4370448% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.4300533% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes _ 2.2883037% All Inclusive Cost AI 2.5299134 % IRS Form 8038 Net interest Cost 2.3075011% Weighted Average Maturity 6.176 Years 08 net rash ofSer 02$121 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 1/152010 1 8:57 AM Associates Ehlers & Public Finance Page 1 City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 9 APPENDIX B RESOLUTION 2010 -19 RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE INTENTION TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS AND THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 2010 THROUGH 2014 UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 475.521 A. WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") may issue bonds to finance capital expenditures under its capital improvement plan (the "Plan") without an election provided that, among other things, prior to issuing the bonds the City adopts the Plan after a public hearing thereon and publishes a notice of its intention to issue the bonds and the date and time of a hearing to obtain public comment on the matter; and B. WHEREAS, the City Council will hold a public hearing on its intention to Issue general obligation capital improvement plan bonds (the "Bonds ") to refinance the outstanding portion of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's $12,410,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, originally issued to finance the City Hall and Public Safety Facility and to adopt the Plan therefor pursuant thereto on February 16, 2010; and NOW, THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City Council hereby calls for a public hearing on its intent to issue the Bonds and to adopt the Plan therefor, such hearing to be held on the date and time set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. The City Council is hereby directed to cause the notice to be published at least 14 but not more than 28 days before the hearing in the official newspaper of the City or a newspaper of general circulation in the City. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 19th day of January, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 19, 2010 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2010 -2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") will meet on February, 16, 2010, at or after 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of Edina City Hall, in part to hold a public hearing concerning (1) the issuance of general obligation bonds (the `Bonds ") in an amount not to exceed $9,500,000 to refinance for purposes of interest rate savings the outstanding principal of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority's $12,410,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, originally issued to finance the City Hall and Public Safety Facility; and (2) the proposal to adopt a capital improvement plan for 2010 through 2014 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above. If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of the Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the City in the last general election, is filed with the City Clerk within 30 days after the public hearing (i.e., by March 18, 2010), the City may issue the Bonds only after obtaining approval of a majority of voters voting on the question at an election. A copy of the plan is available for inspection in the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 4801 W 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. Questions or comments may be directed to the City Clerk's Office at 952- 826 -0408. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the public hearing either orally or in writing, or may file written comments with the City Clerk before the hearing. Dated: , 20_ BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA /s/ City Clerk [Submit ; Publish City of Edina CIP for Financing Purposes Page 11 owe 00 0 �y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE ,see TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Matthew Sisterman, IT Manager VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: February 16, 2010 AGENDA ITEM III.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2010 Fiber -Optic Location Service Contract Renewal Company 1. Access Communications, Inc. 2. 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Access Communications, Inc. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $22,727.71 2.$ 3.$ 4.$ 5.$ $22,727.71 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is the 2010 renewal of the location service contract for the City's fiber -optic lines. Renewal of this contract provides for the City's fiber -optic lines to be located and marked in conjunction with the Gopher State One Call system. The cost of this service contract has increased above $15,000 this year due to the expansion and addition of fiber -optic lines owned by the City in 2009. Maintaining this service contract ensures that the City's fiber optic lines are not disturbed or damaged by excavation projects, which would result in the loss of the City's voice and data services. The Central Services General account will pay for this expenditure. Staff recommends we proceed with the renewal. Administration Signature Department The Recommended Bid is X �......_.. within budget not within budget JohwVVa11Vn, Fi o don Hughes, City Wa4qger Director o e to H� y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: . REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: February 16, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: III. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Toro Greens Mower — Braemar Golf Course DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED: BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE: NA December 30, 2010 Company MTI Distributing (State Contract #442585) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: MTI Distributing $22,088.02 Amount of Ouote or Bid 1. $22,088.02 ACCOUNT #: 5400.1740 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase and delivery of a new 2010 Toro Greensmaster 3150Q greens mower with tee reels. The cost of this machine from MTI under the State Contract #442585 is $24,643.15 and MTI is giving us $4,000.00 for the trade -in of our 2003 Toro tee mower. This trade -in mower has been heavily used for seven seasons and is in need of replacement. The total cost from MTI after trade -in, delivery and sales tax is $22,088.02. Braemar Golf Course owns five of these mowers that are used at Braemar and Fred Richards Golf Courses specifically for mowing tees and the short grass around the greens. There is $145,000.00 budgeted in the Golf Course's 2010 maintenance equipment replacement fund. This is the final large equipment replacement purchase that we anticipate for 2010, which will leave $51,851 remaining in this fund after this purchase. John KeufiA. Director This Recommended bid is within budget not within Edina Park and Recreation- - Department et J allin, nance Director Gordon Hu'Ac6kcity Manager To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 1.6, 2010 Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item N.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2010-23 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolutiop of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Victoria Guter $60 Audrey Buckley Memorial Jane C. Willman $375 Audrey Buckley Memorial Jodie Dornfeld $20 Audrey Buckley Memorial Lori Stasik $30 Audrey Buckley Memorial Georgia Kandiko $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Karon Huff $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Marilyn Sharpe $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Toni Chipka $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Emily Ann Anderson $10 Audrey Buckley Memorial Lynn Goodermont $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Ellie Becker $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Helenmary Kasper $20 Audrey Buckley Memorial Sally 0. Burns $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial M. Joan Hodges $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Mary Lou Loomis $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Tuny O'Rourke $50 In memory of Jane Manick Charles Oliver $10 Audrey Buckley Memorial Carol R. Lord $50 . In memory of Jane Manick Mr. and Mrs. Kurtz $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Joann Ginkel $250 In memory of Jane Manick Helen Anderson $20 Audrey Buckley Memorial Merrikay Baily $50 In memory of Jane Manick Mr. and Mrs. Ahlstrom $25 Audrey Buckley Memorial Braemar Golf Course: Gerhard Brahms $100 Richard Leonard $100 Edina Police Department: Crime Fund $16,510 Residential Mortgage Group $300 Dated: February 16, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Michael Welbaum Non -salary costs of the K9 program $40 James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 16, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk f' ow e • RE PORURE C OMMENDATI ON To: Mayor Hovland and members of Agenda Item I.V. B. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Direct r Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Depa ent Information Only ❑ Date: February 16, 2010 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Adopt Ordinance #2010 -03 ® Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Park Board recommends approval of the concept to offer a Farmers Market at Centennial Lakes Park which requires an amendment to City Code 1230.07. INFO /BACKGROUND: At their January 12, 2010 meeting, the Park Board voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the concept of offering a Farmers Market at Centennial Lakes Park. City Code currently does not permit the sale of produce in a City park and therefore an amendment to the City Code is needed to allow for a Farmers Market at Centennial Lakes Park. A copy of Ordinance #2010 -03 is included in this report. The amendments to Subsections 1230.01 and 1230.07 are highlighted on the attached copy. The Cities of Edina, Richfield and Bloomington collectively applied for and were awarded a grant to promote the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), which is a Health Reform Initiative of the Minnesota Department of Health. There are a number of initiatives involved in this health improvement program; however, one of the initiatives for the City of Edina was decided to focus on increasing resident's access to fresh fruits and vegetables by offering an Edina - based Farmers Market. Bloomington Public Health's SHIP Community Liaison Sueling Schardin will be present at the Council meeting to answer any questions regarding SHIP or the grant. Background information provided by staff of the SHIP grant states: O VER VIEW Edina residents are not consuming the recommended 9 or more servings of fruits and vegetables every day. Eating a balanced diet is one of the most important things a person can do to maintain and improve overall health. Poor nutrition can contribute to obesity and other chronic diseases. Based on self - reported data from the 2007 MN Student Survey and 2006 Survey of the Health of All the Population and the Environment (data from south suburbs of Hennepin County): • More than 75% of-6th, 9th and 12th graders and 75% of adults did not consume the recommended servings of fruits and vegetables the day prior to the surveys. • Twenty percent of 9th graders, 17% of 12th graders, and 50% of adults were overweight or obese. FARMER'S MARKET Experts suggest purchasing foods directly through farms, including farmer's markets, have the potential to increase consumption of healthier foods, by lowering costs of fresh foods, making fresh foods available in areas without supermarkets and harvesting fruits and vegetables at ripeness rather than shipping convenience may improve nutrient quality and taste. In addition, the United States is not producing enough fruits and vegetables for all Americans to eat in the quantities recommended in the USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Farmer's markets can increase the amount of produce grown and made available to local consumers. It also improves local economic development and supports environmental sustainability. If the Council approves the proposed Ordinance #2010 -03, it is staff s intent to promote and administer a Farmers Market at Centennial Lakes Park. The following is currently the concept we intend to pursue if the Ordinance is approved:, Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market Information • Proposed dates for the initial Farmers Market are July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010. Total of 14 market dates. • The proposed day and times for the market are Thursdays from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. • This will be a growers market, meaning that all products sold at the market must be produced by the seller. Producers of farmstead products such as fruits and vegetables, cheese, maple syrup, meats, fish and eggs may be sold. Other items such as canned goods, breads, candies, bakery items and honey would also be available. • Vendors will set up along the walkway from the Centrum Building north to the Parklawn bridge, and from the Centrum south to the 76`h Street bridge. There is space for approximately 60 twenty foot wide spaces. The number of vendors will be limited to 25 vendors the first year. Expansion of the market is possible as customer demand dictates. • Vendor fee for the 14 week season will be $200. • Expenses involved with the market will primarily be limited to marketing efforts. No additional staffing would be necessary; existing staffing levels would be sufficient to handle the set -up and tear down from the market. Revenues: Booth fees (25 vendors x $200) $5000 Sponsorships 1000 Total Revenues $6000 Expenses: Advertising and Printing $3,500 General supplies $ 500 Maintenance & Administrative Staff $1,500 Cleaning supplies $ 500 Total Expenses $6,000 Attached is a copy of "Centennial Lakes Farmers Market 2010 Guidelines and Application," which includes the Application Form and Market Policies for: • Market Goods • Market Space • Set -up /Tear -down • General policies Centennial Lakes Park Manager Tom Shirley will give the Council a brief presentation on how we intend to administer and manage the Farmers Market. Tom has done some background and research on the subject with other communities and has met with vendors to learn from their experiences. Also included in this packet is a copy of the proposed City Code amendment which is needed to permit the sale of produce at Centennial Lakes Park. The Park Board also recommends adoption of this proposed City Code amendment to permit the sale of produce at Centennial Lakes Park. Also included in this packet is a letter of support for this concept from Bill Alldredge, Chair of the Edina Community Health Committee. If the City Council approves of the Park Board's recommendation, staff recommends that the Council waive second reading on the Ordinance amendment. ORDINANCE NO. 2010-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING FARMERS MARKETS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 1230.01 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following definition: Farmer's Market. The seasonal selling or offering for sale at retail of vegetables, produce, flowers, jam, jelly, pies and similar products, occurring in a predesignated area, where the vendors are individuals who have raised or produced the products being offered for sale or have taken the same on consignment for retail sale. Section 2. Subsection 1230.07 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: 1230.07 Special Permits for Pushcarts and Sidewalk Cafes. Notwithstanding the requirements of this Section 1230, certain pushcarts and sidewalk cafes are permitted on sidewalks and farmers markets are permitted on City owned property subject to the requirements of this Subsection. Subd. 1 Pushcarts. Pushcarts, as defined by Section 721 of this Code, may be located on sidewalks within the area included in the plan prepared by the HRA entitled, "50th and France Commercial Area Plan" dated December 3, 1974, subject to a permit issued pursuant to this Subdivision. A. In addition to the requirements of Section 160 of this Code, no permit shall be issued for a pushcart unless the following requirements are met: 1. The pushcart must be licensed in accordance with Section 721 of this Code. 2. The applicant for a permit must possess a valid food establishment license or take- out food license, pursuant to Section 721 of this Code, for a food establishment located in the 50th and France commercial area. 3. The pushcart shall not exceed eight feet in length, four feet in width, and eight feet in height. 4. The pushcart shall be equipped with casters or wheels to permit ease of movement. 14894003 RNK:r 12/03/2009 5. The pushcart shall be equipped with facilities for the disposal of trash generated by the pushcart. B. In addition to the requirements of Section 721 of this Code, the following requirements shall apply to the operation of pushcarts: 1. Pushcarts shall be parked on public sidewalks and walkways only in those locations specified in the permit. 2. Pushcarts shall be stored indoors following the close of business each day. 3. Only food or beverages for immediate consumption may be offered from the pushcart. 4. Cleaning, servicing, and maintenance of the pushcart shall be undertaken only in an area approved by the Sanitarian. C. Permits issued pursuant to this paragraph shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. D. The number of permits which may be in force under this Subd. 1 at any one time shall not exceed six. Subd. 2 Sidewalk Cafes. Sidewalk cafes may be located on sidewalks subject to a permit issued by the City Manager pursuant to this Subdivision. Applications for a sidewalk cafe permit shall be made on forms supplied by the Clerk and shall include a plan drawn to scale which illustrates the exact location of the proposed sidewalk cafe together with distances and dimensions of the adjoining buildings, the sidewalk, the distance to and location of the traveled portion of the street and distances to all obstructions in the vicinity. The application shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. If the application is denied, the application fee less $100 shall be returned to the applicant. A. In addition to the requirements of Section 160 of this Code, no permit shall be issued or renewed for a sidewalk cafe unless the following requirements are met: 1. The applicant must possess a valid food establishment license pursuant to Section 721 of this Code. 2. A distance of at least 200 feet shall be maintained between the nearest point of the sidewalk cafe to the nearest point of property used for residential purposes. 3. The applicant must furnish to the Clerk, evidence that public liability insurance has been procured for any death or personal injury arising from the ownership, maintenance, or operation of the sidewalk cafe in amounts not less than $100,000 for injury to or death of one person, of $300,000 for any one incident, and not less than 14894003 2 RNKA 2 /03/2009 $50,000 for damage to property arising from any one incident. The applicant shall maintain such insurance in effect at all times during the term of the permit. The City shall be named as an additional named insured in the policy providing such insurance. 4. The applicant shall indemnify and hold the City and the City's officials and employees harmless from any loss, cost, damage and expenses arising out of the use, design, operation, or maintenance of the sidewalk cafe. 5. The area occupied by the sidewalk cafe shall abut and shall be operated as part of the food establishment operated by the applicant. No part of the sidewalk cafe shall adjoin any premises other than the applicant's food establishment. 6. The City Manager shall find that the sidewalk cafe will not unduly restrict the safe usage of the sidewalk by the public after taking into consideration the location of obstructions, vehicular traffic and other impediments to the passage of pedestrians. The City Manager shall renew a permit only upon finding that the operation of the sidewalk cafe complied with all provisions of this Subdivision and did not constitute a nuisance as defined by Section 1035 of this Code. B. In addition to the requirements of Section 721 of this Code, the following requirements shall apply to the operation of sidewalk cafes. 1. Only food or beverages for immediate consumption may be offered for sale. 2. Intoxicating liquors, beer or wine may be consumed only if the sidewalk cafe is licensed pursuant to Section 900 of this Code. 3. No expansion of the area occupied by the sidewalk cafe from that shown on the permit application shall be made. 4. No tables, chairs, furnishings, planters, railings or other obstructions shall be placed or remain on the sidewalk between November 1 and April 1 except on a day to day basis when the sidewalk cafe is open for business. 5. The applicant shall maintain the sidewalk cafe in a clean and sanitary condition as required by Section 721 of this Code. 6. The applicant shall promptly replace or repair any damage to the sidewalk or other public property caused by the applicant's use of the sidewalk as a sidewalk cafe. C. Permits issued pursuant to this Subdivision shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. Subd. 3 Farmers Markets. Farmers markets may be located in Centennial Lakes Park subject to a permit issued by the Park Director pursuant to this subdivision. Applications for a farmers market permit shall be made on forms supplied by the City 14894003 3 RNK:rl2 /03/2009 Clerk and shall include a plan drawn to scale which illustrates the exact location of the proposed farmers market. The application shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. If the application is denied, the application fee less $100 shall Pe returned to the applicant. 1. The applicant must furnish to the Clerk, evidence that public liability insurance has been procured for any death or personal injury arising from the ownership, maintenance, or operation of the farmers market in amounts not less than $100,000 for injury to or death of one person, of $300,000 for any one incident, and not less than $50,000 for damage to property arising from any one incident. The applicant shall maintain such insurance in effect at all times during the term of the permit. The City shall be named as an additional named insured in the policy providing such insurance. 2. The applicant shall indemnify and hold the City and the City's officials and employees harmless from any loss, cost, damage and expenses arising out of the use, design, operation, or maintenance of the farmers market. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: 148940vO3 4 RNKA 2 /03/2009 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 20_, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk 14894003 5 . RNKA 2 /03/2009 20_ • ��Centennial Lakes Farmers Market � a 2010 Guidelines and Application Market Dates: Thursdays, July 1 - September 30, 2010.3 — 7p.m. Market Location: Centennial Lakes Centrum Plaza 7499 France Ave., Edina, MN 55435 Vendor Application Process: • Return the completed application form, applicable permits/licenses, and proof of insurance to: Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue, Edina, MN 55435. Do not send payment at this time. • Applications received by March 15`h will be notified of their application status by April I". Applications received after March 15`h will be given consideration as space allows. • The City of Edina and the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market committee will review all applications to determine which vendors are best suited for the available market spaces. Market Policies Market Goods: • Our market is intended for local growers or producers to sell what they have grown or produced. No brokers or resellers are allowed. • The following general items are approved for sale: 1. Fresh fruits and vegetables if grown by vendor. 2. Herbs and spices, if grown by vendor. 3. Honey, maple syrup, jams, preserves, pickles and canned goods that are prepared and packaged in accordance with rules established by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and produced by the vendor. 4. Cut flowers, dried flowers, bedding plants and potted plants if grown by the vendor. 5. Bakery goods prepared in a licensed bakery. 6. Meats, cheeses, eggs and fish that is prepared and packed in accordance with rules established by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and produced by the vendor. 7. Candies and treats prepared in a licensed facility and produced by the vendor. • Products not listed above must receive prior approval from the market manager before sale. • Vendors may not sell any items not approved or shown in their market application. Market staff has the right to ask vendors to remove such products, as well as approved products that are deemed to be of poor quality. • All items must be prepared, displayed, sold and stored in accordance with the guidelines established by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Department of Health and the City of Edina Health Department. Vendors are responsible for obtaining all applicable permits that these organizations may require. • All items should be sold by bulk, bundle or individual item. Items sold by weight units of measurement require a Minnesota State Certified Scale. • Market staff reserves the right to inspect crop and production areas. Market Space: • Booth space is 10' x 20'. All selling must be done within these dimensions. • Booth space is not transferable. • Vehicles are not permitted in booth space unless written permission is given by market manager. • Vendors are responsible for providing all tables, canopies and other items needed for their display. • Tents and canopies must be weighted. Stakes are not allowed to be pounded into planter beds due to concerns with damaging irrigation or electrical systems. • Booth space will be determined by a random drawing and will be assigned for the entire season. Market staff reserves the right to reassign booth space to facilitate market operations. • All booths and displays must be clean, safe, neat and tasteful. • All market vendors must have signage noting the vendor/business name. • Prices of goods must be readily visible on appropriate signage. • Electricity is not available. All generators used must be "low noise ". Set- up/Tear -down: • Vendors may begin setting up at 2 p.m. on market day. Market staff will be onsite to assist vendors. • Market vendors must be ready to start selling at 3 p.m. on market day. Selling will only be allowed between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. No selling before or after these times. • No vehicles may be on the market walkways between 2:45 p.m. and 7:01 p.m. • Vendors must remove all items including displays, tents, trash and debris from the market space by 8:00 p.m. This includes product debris and boxes incidental to product sales. General policies: • No smoking or consumption of alcoholic beverages allowed in the Park. • No grilling or cooking of food products is allowed without the prior written permission of the market manager and the approval of the City of Edina Health Department. Food vendors would be required to obtain an itinerant food license and comply with all pertinent regulations. • Product sampling is not allowed without prior approval of the market manger and the Edina Health Department. Special sampling guidelines will apply. • Vendors are not allowed to have pets within the market areas. • Market will take place rain or shine. • Parking shall be allowed in all Centennial Lakes surface lots, however, oversized trucks and trailers are prohibited from parking in any spaces within 150' of the Centennial Lakes Plaza Buildings "A" and "B ". Additional parking restrictions will be applied as needed. • All vendors must represent themselves in a professional manner. Shirts and shoes must be worn at all times. Discourtesy, swearing, shouting or hawking is not allowed. • Price, terms of sale, etc., are solely between the buyer and seller. All vendors agree to abide by fair business practices. • Any required sales tax collections and remittances are the sole responsibility of the vendors. • Vendors assume full liability for the products they sell and hereby agree to hold the City of Edina and Centennial Lakes Park harmless against any claim of injury or damage by any buyer, seller or other persons resulting from the vendor's participation in the market. • The City of Edina is not liable for any injury, theft or damage to either buyers or sellers arising from participation in the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market, whether such injury, theft or damage occurred prior to, during or after the market. Vendor further agrees to indemnify and hold the City of Edina and its employees harmless for and against any claims for such injury, theft or damage. • The City of Edina requires that each vendor have a minimum of $300,000 of general liability insurance and submit a certificate of insurance naming the City of Edina as additional insured. Food vendors or vendors doing food sampling need to have $1,000,000 in general liability insurance. • Any vendor whom the market staff feels is not complying with the market rules may be asked to leave and/or barred from participation in future markets. The vendor, in turn, may petition the market manager for reinstatement. • The Market Manager has ultimate onsite authority to enforce all rules of the market and to mediate disputes. • Seasonal vendor fee for the 2010 season is $200 per space. Individual dates may be available as space allows for $25 per day. 0 y as CENTENNIAL LAKES FARMERS MARKET Thursdays, July 1— September 30, 2010.3 p.m. -7 p.m. 7499 France Avenue, Edina, MN 55435 952- 833 -9582 tshirley ,ci.edina.mn.us Please Print Business/Farm Name: Primary Seller Name: Name of additional sellers: Street address: City: Business phone: Email: VENDOR APPLICATION State: Zip: Other phone: Website: Please list all items that you plan to sell at the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market. Items not listed may not be sold without permission from the Market Manager. If possible, list specific varieties. (Use back of this page if necessary.) Do you grow or produce all items you intend to sell? If "No", please explain: ❑ Yes ❑No Address where crops are grown/products produced: Are your items organic or organically grown? ❑ Yes, license # ❑ No What other local farmers markets do you currently participate in: k Please check all weeks that you plan on attending the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market: _ July 1 _ July 29 _ Aug 26 _ Sept 23 _ July 8 _ Aug 5 _ Sept 2 _ Sept 30 _ July 15 _ Aug 12 _ Sept 9 _ July 22 _ Aug 19 _ Sept 16 Market participation fee is $200 for the season. Please initial each box and sign below: ❑ I have read and agree to abide by all Centennial Lakes Farmers Market policies. I understand that failure to follow these policies may exclude my participation in the market with forfeiture of all monies paid. ❑ I agree that the City of Edina and its respective employees, officials and agents are not liable for any injury, theft or damage to either the buyer or seller, or their property, arising out of my participation in the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market. I further agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edina and its respective employees, officials and agents for and against any claims for injury, theft or damage. ❑ The City of Edina takes pictures and videos of people participating in the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market for use in marketing and promotional purposes. I grant permission to use the name, pictures, videos and quotes of my employees and myself for the above purposes. ❑ I understand that I must carry a minimum of $300,000 in general liability and product liability insurance because the City of Edina does not provide this coverage. I have enclosed my certificate of liability coverage with my application, listing the City of Edina as additional insured. Signature of Vendor: Date: Applications received by March 15`x' will be notified of their application status by April l" If you receive an acceptance letter, payment will be due by May 21". Applications received after March 15`'' will be given consideration as space allows. Booth locations will be determined at a later date. For more information call 952- 833 -9582 or email tshirley(a,ci.edina.mn.us Please mail: • Signed Application that has been filled out in its entirety • Copies of applicable licenses and permits • Liability insurance certificate • Completed ST19 form • If you can include a photo of your booth/display, it would be greatly appreciated! Mail to: Centennial Lakes Park, Att: Farmers Market, 7499 France Avenue, Edina, MN 55435 City of Edina February 3, 2010 Mayor Jim Hovland and Council Members City of Edina 4801 W 50" St Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: The new Minnesota Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) was developed to address rising health care costs by addressing causes of chronic disease such as poor nutrition and physical inactivity. The Edina Community Health Committee recognizes that proper nutrition and physical activity is vital to good health, disease prevention, and essential for healthy growth and development of children and adolescents. In 2006, the Community Health Committee recommended that the City of Edina participate in the Governor's Fit City Program and provide opportunities for people who live, work and play in Edina to have choices that support physical activity and active living. One initiative addressing the nutrition component of chronic disease prevention is accessibility to fresh fruits and vegetables. A local farmers market would compliment established grocery stores and provide an additional source of quality nutrition for our residents and visitors. The Community Health Committee fully supports the concept of a local Farmers Market in Edina and agrees with the Edina Park Board recommendation to amend the City Code to allow for a Farmers Market at Centennial Lakes. Thank you for your consideration of our support of the Edina Park Board recommendation regarding a local Farmers Market. Warm Regards, Bill 11 re ge Community Health Committee Chair Cc: Edina Park Board city Nall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Minutes of the Edina Park Board January 12, 2010 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Kenney, Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Bill Lough, Rob Presthus, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Ben Pobuda MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeff Sorem STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Todd Anderson, Tom Shirley I. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 13, 2009 PARK BOARD MINUTES Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 13, 2009 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Randy Meyer SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of Audubon Certification Awarded to Fred Richards Golf Course and Audubon Re- Certification Awarded to Braemar Golf Course - Karen Schragg, Manager of the City of Richfield's Woodlake Nature Center, gave a power point presentation regarding the Audubon Certification Awarded to the Fred Richards Golf Course as well as the Re- Certification awarded to Braemar Golf Course. Ms. Schragg explained the program and thanked Bob Atol for asking her to get involved and to help do the certification of the Fred Richards Golf Course. Mr. Schragg congratulated the City of Edina because they met the goals and thanked everyone who helped with it. She then presented an Audubon Print to Todd Anderson, on behalf of the Richards Golf Course. B. Amendment to City Code 1230.07 — Farmers Market at Centennial Lakes Park — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the cities of Edina, Richfield and Bloomington collectively applied for and were recently awarded a grant to promote the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), which is a health reform initiative of the Minnesota Department of Health. Sue Schardin of SHIP gave a power point presentation on SHIP and explained how it relates to the grant program. She also pointed out the City Council did see the same presentation at their October City Council meeting. Tom Shirley, Manager of Centennial Lakes, informed the Park Board that they almost started a farmers market a few years ago but due to the city ordinance Centennial Lakes could not be a location for one. Mr. Shirley informed the Park Board that the timing is now right for a farmers market and commented that during the last several months-he has talked to potential vendors and people in the community. He noted that he has learned a lot about farmers markets in the last few months and is still learning. He explained that currently they are proposing to hold a farmers market each Thursday from 3 pm to 7 pm starting July 1" and ending September 30`h. This ends up being 14 farmer market dates. Mr. Shirley explained that this farmers market would be a "producers market" which means that all of the produce is sold by the seller with the exception of-a few unique items. He indicated that eventually they would like to have 60 to 70 booths but he would like to start out this summer with 25 booths. He noted that the booths would be set up along the walkway from the Centrum Building north to Parklawn and south to 76`h Street. They would split it 12 booths to the north and 13 booths to the south. He added that there are 250 booths at the "Fall into the Arts" festival. He pointed out that he is considering charging $20.00 per booth per day or get a discount and pay $250.00 for the season. Mr. Shirley commented that initially they thought their expenses would be around $7,000 so it's not a big money maker but more of an event. Mr. Keprios asked about the $1,000 sponsorship to which Mr. Shirley replied that they are hoping to find someone to sponsor the fanners markets where they would distribute literature and things like that. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they will be sensitive to the local grocers as far as what products are offered at the local farmers market. He noted that it has been shown that on the days of the farmers markets the local grocers' business goes up. He noted that they will be very watchful and will learn as they go and adjust as needed to best serve the farmers market vendors, customers and local grocers and stated that we will make an effort to make it a win, win for everyone. Mr. Keprios stated that in order to go forward they need Park Board's approval and recommendation of the concept of having a farmers market at Centennial Lakes which also requires an amendment of the city ordinance to permit the sale of produce in a park. Mr. Meyer asked what does SHIP pay for to which Mr. Shirley replied they will pay for advertising, signage, brochures, etc. He noted that he is hoping that the booth fees and sponsorship fee will cover Centennial Lake's miscellaneous expenses such as trash pick -up. Mr. Shirley indicated that the vendors supply their own booths and take care of their own set up and take down, and are called on to be totally self sufficient. Mr. Lough asked if any other locations were considered and asked how they arrived at Centennial Lakes. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that years back they had a vegetable stand at the Aquatic Center in the parking lot and the City's revenues collected were to support the Art Center. However, when it became too disruptive with parking they moved it to Utley Park as a pilot project. A resident challenged the vegetable stand because it was in violation of city ordinance. City Code does allow for sale of produce on private property which is why there is one at Southdale in their parking lot. Mr. Keprios stated that they also considered having it in the parking lot at Braemar; however, they have adequate parking and easy access to several businesses at Centennial Lakes. He pointed out that the "Fall into the Arts" festival has always worked out well. In addition, there is a lot of subsidized housing in the area, frequently used trails and is in a highly visible area. These are all of the reasons 2 for his rationale to have a farmers market at Centennial Lakes. However, he is always open to other suggestions. Mr. Pobuda asked if any other days were looked at besides Thursdays. Mr. Shirley replied that they did look at other days but Thursdays seemed to make the most sense. The closest farmers market to Edina on a Thursday is in Maple Grove. He added that there is a lot of competition for vendors on Saturdays. Mr. Shirley commented that if all goes well they may consider another day as well but they want to stay away from weekends. One other thing is they have "Movies in the Park" at Centennial Lakes on Thursday nights so that could also be a plus to having it on Thursdays. Mr. Fronek asked Mr. Shirley if he has talked to the businesses and retail shops in the area about the farmers market. Mr. Shirley replied that they briefly discussed it with the management in the plaza area to which he has not yet heard back from Byerly's. Mr. Shirley noted that Centennial Lakes does have the rights to the parking lot but they do want to be sensitive to the businesses and noon is typically the busiest time so they won't start the farmers market until 3:00 pm. He noted that he does not think there will be an issue. Ms. Kenney asked what the rationale is for only starting with 25 vendors when you have the room for a lot more. Mr. Shirley replied they want to start small and not get in over their heads; they would like to ease into it. He indicated there is a lot of work involved and noted that they need to make sure everything is local and home grown. He added that they do hope to eventually add more booths. Ms. Steel asked how many bike racks are at Centennial Lakes to which Mr. Shirley replied they have one set of bike racks which are currently located on the north edge as you enter the promenade. Ms. Steel strongly suggested that they look at putting in more bike racks. Mr. Meyer asked who will be responsible for inspecting these farms to which Mr. Shirley replied that he will be. He noted that the City Horticulturist, Tim Zimmerman, will be checking on the farms located in the northern suburbs because he lives in that area and that is where most of the farms are located. Mr. Peterson commented that Tom Shirley looks like he would be a good candidate to be President of the Twin Cities Farmers Market Municipal League. He stated that they really don't need to reinvent the wheel when so many municipalities already have farmers markets. He noted that they should all get together a couple of times a year to give and receive input from each other. Mr. Shirley commented that he has met with people from other municipalities and they have been very willing to share their information. They have given him some great ideas as well as told him different things to avoid. Mr. Peterson commented that he and his wife like to go to the farmers market at Mill City by the Guthrie and indicated that they also have food to eat at the site and asked Mr. Shirley if they would be providing food. Mr. Shirley replied that they are looking into it however, that brings the Health Department into it a little more. Mr. Peterson commented that at Mill City they also have arts and crafts and asked if they would have those as well. Mr. Shirley responded that farmers markets are really split 50150 some allow them and others are strictly for produce. He noted that he thinks initially they will stay away from arts and crafts especially because of the "Fall into the Arts Festival ". He added that they may have flowers. Mr. Meyer asked about the process for approving the city ordinance will it just allow one at Centennial Lakes or can there be one anywhere in the city. Mr. Keprios replied that right now he would like to see it limited to Centennial Lakes only. Mr. Meyer asked if the issues around signage have been considered, discussed and evaluated. Mr. Keprios replied that there is a sign ordinance in place that they will have to abide by. Mr. Meyer asked how it will be done to which Mr. Keprios responded that he thinks they will approach it like the "Fall into the Arts" festival. They will put them up in local areas so that people will know about it ahead of time. Mr. Lough commented that in terms of sequencing it is recommended that the Park Board recommend that the City Council approve the concept of the farmers market at Centennial Lakes and to amend the city ordinance. Mr. Lough asked Mr. Keprios if the city ordinance needs to be changed now before some additional planning and scoping work can be done. Could the Park Board just recommend the concept to the City Council at this time or is it necessary to do both of them now to prove they are serious. Mr. Keprios replied that he feels they go hand in hand and asked Mr. Lough if he has a hesitation with changing the city ordinance. Mr. Lough replied no, but his thought is what if they change the city ordinance and they don't approve the final concept down the road the city ordinance still remains changed and that's his question. Mr. Keprios stated that it goes hand in hand and explained that the City Council can actually waive second reading on a change of ordinance. He indicated that the Park Board can approve everything in February unless they would like more information at the February Park Board meeting. Jerry, Lakeville resident, indicated that several families rent land from him to grow produce to bring to farmers markets. He noted that he runs a couple of farmers markets himself and that they would be very interested in having a booth at the farmers market at Centennial Lakes. He pointed out that someone could inspect 10 different families easily in an hour on his land. He noted that they also have several acres of flowers so everything is fresh off the farm. Joseph Hulbert MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT OF THE FARMERS MARKET AND NEW ORDINANCE AS PROPOSED BY STAFF. Rob Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. Veteran's Memorial Proposal - Utley Park - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that this is a concept they have talked about for several years. He noted that currently there are a few plaques within Edina's parks that honor veterans. However, there is no designated park or large memorial to honor all those who have served in our Armed Forces. rd Mr. Keprios gave a power point presentation to the Park Board showing veterans memorials in surrounding community parks. He noted that it seemed to make the most sense to him to put one in Edina at Utley Park. He commented that Utley Park has a big grassy area right next to the Greg Rice Shelter Memorial. He noted that at this site they would not have to remove any trees. In addition, its location is right along the Fourth of July parade route which always includes our honored veterans. Also, there is a flag pole with a plaque that reads: "American Legion Flagpole — Dedicated to the men and women who honorably served their country in times of war and peace. Edina Post #471. May 30, 1955 ". Therefore, it seemed to make the most sense to focus on this area however, there are other sites that could be looked at if the Park Board feels there may be a better location. Mr. Keprios indicated that it's staff's recommendation to spend Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) dollars to hire professional architect/engineer services to assist a committee. He pointed out this would not take away dollars from any other project. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he would ask the Park Board to also approve the process as recommended by staff which would include forming an 11 member Veterans Memorial Committee appointed by the Park Board. This committee would be the one to come up with recommended designs and concepts to be approved by the Park Board and City Council. He noted that the committee would also raise all of the funds to cover all of the construction costs. He noted that he would ask the Edina Foundation to be the "Charitable Giving Partner" for the fundraising efforts. The committee would also conduct whatever research may be needed. He noted that it would all be volunteer fundraising and not staff. Mr. Keprios suggested that they could also publicize it on the website and newspaper as well as print brochures and go on -site to solicit volunteers and donations. Mr. Keprios pointed out that staff would oversee the construction management. Mr. Presthus asked Mr. Keprios how much he thinks it will cost in the end to which Mr. Keprios replied it is way too premature to even guess what it would cost. He stated that it will depend on what the committee feels would be appropriate for the site as well as what the Park Board and City Council feel is appropriate. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that it was an Edina resident, Mike Goergen who came forward and triggered this and he is willing to step up and serve as chair of the committee. He noted that he appreciates Mr. Goergen's initiative, support and call to serve. Ms. Steel asked what if the dollars are approved for the architect /engineer and we don't receive enough through fundraising for the construction how can they protect themselves in the process? Mr. Keprios replied that if they invest money in the professional services and they fail to raise enough dollars through fundraising then they would go to a Plan B. He explained that if it becomes priority enough to fund through the CIP, it would have to compete with all of the other projects in need, but those are decisions for the Park Board and City Council when and if that time comes. 5 Ms. Kenney stated that it seems the hiring of architects /engineers out of the CIP may be a little premature given that they haven't even formed a committee to at least have a basic idea of what to design or what the budget might be. She noted that if the committee takes time to explore what the potential budget may be or what funds could potentially be raised but at least a concept of what the construction might look like; then maybe take money from the CIP to hire an architect to design a plan at that point. Mr. Keprios commented that if the Park Board favors the concept but doesn't want to commit the dollars for architect fees at this time that's okay but then maybe the committee can be charged with coming up with some of the initial funds for professional services and see where it goes. Mr. Keprios noted that he has come forward with this initial recommendation as a sign of the city's commitment to the project. However, if the Park Board feels they ought to go forward and that the money ought to be donated up front that could also be an option. Mr. Meyer stated that conceptually he thinks it's a great idea but if the city is currently looking at furloughs to city employees and now we are going to throw $30,000 at a concept that is in the early stages he's not sure know how best to deal with it at this time. He needs to think about the situation we are in but at the same time he is willing to be creative and let it develop a little further and then decide whether to appropriate funding at that point. Mr. Fronek stated that in September the Park Board approved $30,000 to be dedicated to the Community Garden Development and asked if they could laterally decide to put that money somewhere else. Mr. Keprios noted that he did not mean to imply we would never do a community garden, it is not an either or situation for the money. He stated that if this becomes a priority and it is what the Park Board wants the money to be used for; then maybe they should walk before they run and first raise the money through fundraising, donations, etc., and then go through the public process. Mr. Fronek indicated that in fairness to the public the Park Board has already agreed to put $30,000 into the community garden and to laterally decide to do something else he's not sure what the implications of that would be. He explained that it's not a reallocation, there is a pool of money that he believes can be drawn from that would not affect the community gardens, they would not eliminate projects they have already committed to doing. Mr. Keprios pointed out that this project has come to us after the fact and that it does not change or replace anything. This would be considered a new project that would be higher on the list. Mr. Fronek noted that he doesn't want to step over their bounds without further input from the public; he doesn't want the public to have the concern that the Park Board is inconsistent or a transient board if we decided to do something different than what we said at the September meeting. Mr. Keprios commented that he only suggested the dollars are there if this becomes a priority. He noted that if they want they can go through the public process and let the people be given the opportunity to express their views if that's what they want their capital dollars to be used on. Mr. Keprios stated that he appreciates the comments that we ought to walk before we run and maybe use fundraising money to begin with once they know what the scope of the project is 0 going to be and what money is needed for professional services before recommending CIP dollars. Mr. Fronek stated that in terms of budget and structure and back to Mr. Meyer's point with city furloughs, etc. is it correct that the CIP dollars don't affect any operational costs to the city. Mr. Keprios replied that is correct, those dollars can only be used for capital expenditures, it's a separate pool of money. Mr. Lough asked Mr. Keprios if the City Council can rearrange that pool of money from the CIP from time to time during the course of a budget period to take into account current economic situations. Mr. Keprios replied they do, in fact if anything they probably don't spend a lot of what is out there especially now during our tough economic times. They can move things around from time to time but it's not frequent and usually when something is set, it's set; however, this is something new that has come forward and there is currently no dollars for it in the operating budget. He noted that other than donations and /or grants, the funds within the CIP would be the only other available pool of money. Mr. Keprios commented that the City Council does have the authority to issue this money if they so choose. Mike Goergen, 6605 Kenny Place, informed the Park Board that several months ago he approached Mr. Keprios about the possibility of putting in a Veteran's Memorial at one of the City's parks and requested that the city consider this. He informed the Park Board that he is a Marine Corp Veteran and did serve in the Vietnam War. He stated that he feels they cannot do enough for their veterans and in particular those who gave their lives in the time of war. Mr. Goergen noted that he and Mr. Keprios have had many meetings to come up with the proposal that is now in front of the Park Board. He noted that he would be more than happy to chair the committee and that he will do whatever it takes through donations, fundraising, etc., to get the memorial established. He stated that he hopes the Park Board will at least endorse the concept of having a Veteran's Memorial at a city park. Mr. Fronek asked in order to start the project what would the approximate initial cost be. Mr. Goergen replied that the cost will depend on the concept of the committee as well as what is approved by the city, so right now it's a nebulous figure. He noted that the committee will have many functions, such as advertising, brochures, fundraising, civic groups, foundations, individuals, website, etc. In addition, the committee will also discuss and bring forth the components of this memorial from the statue to marble /granite to plaques, etc. At that point they will then have the architect run with his design of those elements and components that the committee would like included in the design of the memorial. Mr. Fronek pointed out that there are two components of having a Veteran's Memorial. The first component is the approval of the concept although it may be premature to say it will be at Utley Park, although it does seem to be the right place to put it. The second component is getting the dollars needed to kick start this project. 7 Mr. Presthus stated that he thinks this a great idea and is needed. However, he does think there needs to be more planning and information, he doesn't think they are quite there yet to be taking $30,000 from the CIP. Mr. Meyer indicated that he thinks this is a good concept but there is a lot more work that needs to be done. Ms. Kenney commented that she agrees with Mr. Presthus and Mr. Meyer and that it's a two part component. She noted that she wholeheartedly approves the concept of having a Veteran's Memorial in a city park. However, more work needs to be done by the committee before they can commit any money. Mr. Lough stated that he thinks for a city like Edina he is surprised that they have not entertained the idea of a memorial to honor the men and women who have gone in harms way or potentially in harms way to serve us. He commented that now that the idea is before us he thinks they should wholeheartedly support some sort of development of the concept whether it be through the formation of a committee to further flush out and put in some specifics and details into the concept that has been presented would be fine with him. However, he does think it's a little premature to commit dollars to it but we should be enthusiastic about moving forward with the concept because he certainly thinks these men and women deserve that honor. Ms. Steele noted that she agrees with everything that has been said. Mr. Peterson thanked Mr. Goergen for his hard work and dedication. He noted that looking ahead his only question is that the Fourth of July parade goes down an Edina street but the City seems to be moving in the direction of the Centennial Lakes area. He would like to see Centennial Lakes as a potential location for the Veteran's Memorial and added that it would also be a safer place for a parade. Mr. Pobuda stated that he thinks it's a great idea. Mr. Fronek indicated that he has a lot of the same sentiment as a lot of people; although he is in the camp to commit the dollars necessary so that the project doesn't fizzle out from the get go. Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT AS MADE BY STAFF AND COMMIT CIP DOLLARS AS DEEMED NECESSARY TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN. APPROVE PROPOSAL AS WRITTEN. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. FOR: Todd Fronek, Ben Pobuda, Dan Peterson AGAINST: Randy Meyer, Rob Presthus, Jennifer Kenney, Keeya Steel, Bill Lough MOTION FAILED Rob Presthus MOVED TO GO AHEAD WITH THE MAJORITY OF WHAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN BUT TO EXCLUDE THE $30,000 FROM THE CIP BUT TO N ESSENTIALLY FORM A COMMITTEE TO START THE PROCESS AND THEN REAPPROACH LATER IN 2010 AFTER MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. Jennifer Kenney SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Fronek reiterated that the motion approved forming a committee and the concept of a Veteran's Memorial within a city park without CIP funding. Mr. Keprios asked for clarification that the motion doesn't say it has to be at Utley Park, but that they will explore all opportunities within Edina. Mr. Keprios stated that he will start to move forward and solicit members for the committee. The Park Board thanked Mr. Goergen for all of his work and efforts. D. 2010 Park Board Meeting Calendar— Mr. Keprios confirmed that the Park Board meetings are held the second Tuesday of the month in the Council Chambers. He noted that the only unknowns for 2010 are the meetings in August and September. It. is unknown at this time when the primary election will be; otherwise the calendar is as it appears in the handout. Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2010 PARK BOARD MEETING CALENDAR. Rob Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. III. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. Outdoor Skating Rinks — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that with the cold weather they have had the opportunity to make outdoor ice. He noted that he is very proud of his staff for the great job they've done. He noted that as the Park Board recommended Countryside Park is not open this year. He also reminded the Park Board that the rinks will be closing on February 15`h regardless of the weather, which will result in some money savings. B. Centennial Lakes Winter Festival — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that on Sunday there was a winter festival at Centennial Lakes and that it was heavily attended. He noted that they had ice sculptures, face painters, exhibition hockey, etc. It was a wonderful event. W. UPDATES FROM PARK BOARD A. Jeff Sorem — Mr. Fronek informed the Park Board that although Mr. Sorem was unable to attend tonight's Park Board meeting he would still like to thank him at this time for his last six years of service. He noted that there will be two new Park Board members at next month's Park Board meeting. B. 9 -Mile Creek Regional Trail — Mr. Lough asked what the current status is of the Nine -Mile Creek Regional Trail. Mr. Keprios replied he will be hosting a meeting tomorrow night. It will be the 2 "d Community Assessment Team Meeting of the 9 proposed 9 -Mile Creek Regional Trail. He pointed out that the Community Assessment Team is made up of residents from each of the segmenis where the trail may go. He noted that after the first meeting they set up site visits and walked each segment so that they can objectively determine all of the pros and cons. He commented that it is moving along. Mr. Keprios stated that ultimately he hopes that either at the March or April Park Board meeting staff will come forward with a recommendation based on information they have learned the last year through the Community Assessment Team, the Environmental Assessment Worksheet and Three Rivers Park District. He stated that once it is approved it will be passed on to the City Council where most likely they will conduct a public hearing on the matter. Meeting adjourned at 8:35 pm 10 To: City Council From: James B. Hovland Mayor Date: February 16, 2010 Subject: Appointment to Art Center Board REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item IV. C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Consider appointment for remainder of Michael Whiff's term ending 2/1/2013. Info /Background: Mayor Hovland will provide a recommendation based upon candidate rankings received from Council members. �F REPO RURECOM MEN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV.D. From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: February 16, 2010 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Debt Compliance Policy Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve the Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Policy. Info /Background: The City issued taxable bonds (Build America Bonds) November of last year which will be partially reimbursed by the Federal Government. The IRS is responsible for enforcing compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other regulations governing these and other tax exempt debt. The IRS expects issuers and beneficiaries of these obligations to adopt and implement a post- issuance debt compliance policy and procedures to safeguard against post- issuance violations. Based on questionnaires that the IRS has sent to other cities to determine compliance, Edina's financial advisor Ehlers & Associates has produced a recommended policy and procedure which is attached. The main changes in the way the City of Edina currently handles bond compliance and the policy and procedures attached is the retention period for certain documents (three years following the final payment of the bond) and the policy to ensure future compliance with issuers of 501(c)3 non - profit organizations or Industrial Revenue Bonds. Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures will apply to each qualifying obligation ($6,125,000 Taxable Public Revenue Bonds Series 2009B is attached) and will be included in each obligation's records. CITY OF EDINA Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Policy The City Council of the City of Edina has chosen, by policy, to take steps to help ensure that all obligations will be in compliance with all applicable state and federal regulations. This policy may be amended, as necessary, in the future. Background The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is responsible for enforcing compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and most other regulations governing certain obligations (As example: tax- exempt obligations, Build America Bonds, Recovery Zone Development Bonds and various "Tax Credit" Bonds). The IRS expects issuers and beneficiaries of these obligations to adopt and implement a post- issuance debt compliance policy and procedures to safeguard against post - issuance violations. Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Policy Objective The City of Edina desires to monitor these obligations to ensure compliance with the IRS Code and all other regulations governing such obligations. To help ensure compliance, the City has developed a "Policy ". The following Policy shall apply to these obligations including bonds, notes, loans, lease purchase contracts, lines of credit, commercial paper or any other form of debt that is subject to compliance. Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Policy The Finance Director of the City of Edina is designated as the City's agent who is responsible for post- issuance compliance of these obligations. The Finance Director shall assemble all relevant documentation, records and activities required to ensure post - issuance debt compliance as further detailed in the "Post- Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures ". At a minimum, the Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures for each qualifying obligation will address the following: 1. General Post - Issuance Compliance; 2. Proper and timely use of bond proceeds and bond - financed property; 3. Arbitrage yield restriction and rebate; 4. Timely filings and other general requirements; 5. Additional undertakings or activities that support points 1 through 4 above; 6. Other requirements that become necessary in the future. The Finance Director shall apply the Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures to each qualifying obligation and maintain a record of the results. Further, the Finance Director will ensure that the Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Policy and Procedures are updated on a regular and as needed basis. The Finance Director, or any other individuals responsible for assisting the Finance Director in maintaining records needed to ensure post- issuance compliance, are authorized to expend funds as needed to attend training or secure use of other educational resources for ensuring compliance such as consulting, publications, and compliance assistance. The City of Edina may in the future issue qualifying obligations for beneficiaries such as 501(c) 3 non - profit organizations or Industrial Revenue Bonds. This Policy applies to all such applicable obligations. In order to ensure future compliance with this Policy, the City shall consider issuing qualifying obligations for beneficiaries only when the beneficiary has retained a Trustee and an independent arbitrage consultant for the term of the obligation and this Policy has been incorporated into the Trust Indenture. The Trustee and the independent arbitrage consultant must be retained prior to issuance of the obligation. Adopted this date, February 16, 2010 by the City Council of the City of Edina CITY OF EDINA Last updated 02/16/2010 Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures The City Council of the City of Edina has adopted the attached Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Policy dated February 16, 2010. The Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Policy applies to qualifying debt obligations issued by the City of Edina. As directed by the adoption of the Policy, the Finance Director will perform the following Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures for the following obligation: $6,125,000 Taxable Public Project Revenue Bonds, series 2009B (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations) (Build America Bonds) 1. General Post - Issuance Compliance a. Ensure written procedures and/or guidelines have been put in place for individuals to follow when more than one person is responsible for ensuring compliance with Post - Issuance Procedures. b. Ensure training and/or educational resources for post - issuance compliance have been approved and obtained. c. The Finance Director of the City of Edina understands that that there are options for voluntarily correcting failures to comply with post - issuance compliance requirements (i.e. Treasury Regulations 1.141 -12 remedial actions, Tax- Exempt Bonds Voluntary Closing Agreement Program and the ability to enter into a closing agreement under the Tax- Exempt Bonds Voluntary Closing Agreement Program described in Notice 2001 -60). 2. General Recordkeeping a. Retain records and documents for the obligation for a period of at least three years following the final payment or the date in which the obligation is redeemed unless otherwise directed by Bond Counsel. b. Retain both paper and electronic versions of records and documents for the obligation. c. General Records and Documentation to be Assembled and Retained i. Description of the purpose of the obligation (referred to as the project) and the state statute authorizing the project. ii. Record of tax- exempt status or revocation of tax- exempt status, if applicable. iii. Any correspondence between the City and the IRS. iv. Audited financial statements. v. Bond transcripts, official statements and other offering documents of the obligation. vi. Minutes and resolutions authorizing the issuance of the obligation. vii. Certifications of the issue price of the obligation. viii. Any formal elections for the obligation (i.e. election to employ an accounting methodology other than the specific tracing method). ix. Appraisals, demand surveys, or feasibility studies for property financed by the obligation. x. Documents related to governmental grants, associated with construction, renovation or purchase of property financed with the obligation. xi. Reports of any prior IRS examinations of the City of Edina or the City's obligation. 3. Arbitrage Yield Restriction and Rebate Recordkeeping a. Investment and Arbitrage Documentation to be Assembled and Retained L An accounting of all deposits, expenditures, interest income and asset balances associated with each fund established in connection with the obligation. This includes an accounting of all monies deposited to the Debt Service Account to make debt service payments on the obligation, regardless of the source derived. Accounting for expenditures and assets is described in further detail in Section 3b. ii. Statements prepared by Trustee or Investment Provider. iii. Documentation of at least quarterly allocations of investments and investment earnings to each obligation (i.e. uncommingling analysis). iv. Documentation for investments made with obligation proceeds such as: 1. Investment contracts (i.e. guaranteed investment contracts). 2. Credit enhancement transactions (i.e. bond insurance contracts). 3. Financial derivatives (swaps,, caps, etc). 4. Bidding of financial products. • Investments acquired with obligation proceeds are purchased at fair market value (i.e. three bids for open market securities needed in advance refunding escrows). b. Computations of the arbitrage yield. c. Computations of yield restriction and rebate amounts including but not limited to: i. Compliance in meeting the "Temporary Period from Yield Restriction Exception" and limiting the investment of funds after the temporary period expires. ii. Compliance in meeting the "Rebate Exception ". 1. Qualifying for the "Small Issuer Exception ". 2. Qualifying for a "Spending Exception ". • 6 Month Spending Exception • 18 Month Spending Exception • 24 Month Spending Exception 3. Qualifying for the "Bona Fide Debt Service Fund Exception ". 4. Quantifying arbitrage on all funds established in connection with the obligation in lieu of satisfying arbitrage exceptions (including Reserve Funds and Debt Service Funds). d. Computations of yield restriction and rebate payments. e. Timely Tax Form 8038 -T filing, if applicable. i. Remit any arbitrage liability associated with the obligation to the IRS at each five year anniversary date of the obligation, and the date in which the obligation is no longer outstanding (redemption or maturity date), whichever comes sooner, within 60 days of said date. f. Timely Tax Form 8038 -R filing, if applicable. g. Procedures or guidelines for monitoring instances where compliance with applicable yield restriction requirements depends on subsequent reinvestment of obligation proceeds in lower yielding investments (i.e. reinvestment in zero coupon SLGS). 4. Expenditure and Asset Documentation to be Assembled and Retained a. Documentation of allocations of obligation proceeds to expenditures (i.e. allocation of proceeds to expenditures for the construction, renovation or purchase of facilities owned and used in the performance of exempt purposes). b. Documentation of allocations of obligation proceeds to issuance costs. c. Copies of requisitions, draw schedules, draw requests, invoices, bills and cancelled checks related to obligation proceed expenditures during the construction period. d. Copies of all contracts entered into for the construction, renovation or purchase of facilities financed with obligation proceeds. e. Records of expenditure reimbursements incurred prior to issuing bonds for facilities financed with obligation proceeds (Declaration of Official Intent/Reimbursement Resolutions including all modifications). f. List of all facilities and equipment financed with obligation proceeds. g. Depreciation schedules for depreciable property financed with obligation proceeds. h. Documentation that tracks the purchase and sale of assets financed with obligation proceeds. i. Documentation of timely payment of principal and interest payments on the obligation. j. Tracking of all issue proceeds and the transfer of proceeds into the debt service fund as appropriate. k. Documentation that excess earnings from a Reserve Fund is transferred to the Debt Service Fund on an annual basis. Excess earnings are balances in a Reserve Fund that exceed the Reserve Fund requirement. . . 5. Miscellaneous Documentation to be Assembled and Retained a. Procedures to ensure that the project, while the obligation is outstanding, will avoid IRS private business concerns. b. Changes in the project that impact the terms or commitments of the obligation are properly documented and necessary certificates or opinions are on file. 6. Additional Undertakings and Activities that Support Sections 1 through 4 above a. The Finance Director will notify the City's Bond Counsel, Financial Advisor and Arbitrage Provider of any survey or inquiry by the IRS immediately upon receipt (Usually responses to IRS inquiries are due within 21 days of receipt. Such IRS responses require the review of the above mentioned data and must be in writing. As much time as possible is helpful in preparing the response). b. The Finance Director will consult with the City's Bond Counsel, Financial Advisor and Arbitrage Provider before engaging in post- issuance credit enhancement transactions (i.e. bond insurance, letter of credit, or hedging transactions (i.e. interest rate swap, cap). C. The Finance Director will monitor all "qualified tax- exempt debt obligations" within the first calendar year to determine if the limit is exceeded, and if exceeded, will address accordingly. For tax- exempt debt obligations issued during years 2009 and 2010, the limit is $30,000,000 (The limit was $10,000,000 prior to 2009. In 2011 and thereafter it will remain at $10,000,000 unless changed by Congress). During this period, the limit also applies to pooled financings of the governing body and provides a separate $30,000,000 for each 501 (c)(3) conduit borrower. d. Comply with Continuing Disclosure Requirements i. If applicable, the timely filing of annual information agreed to in the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. ii.Give notice of any Material Event. e. Identify any post- issuance change to terms of bonds which could be treated as a current refunding of "old" bonds by "new" bonds, often referred to as a "reissuance ". f. Confirm whether any "remedial action" in connection with a "change of use" must be treated as a "reissuance ". g. The Finance Director will put written procedures in place which designate and direct certain individuals to submit the appropriate tax form and application for federal subsidy payments in a timely fashion for applicable obligations (i.e. Build America Bonds). 7. Compliance with Future Requirements a. Take measures to comply with any future requirements issued beyond the date of these Post - Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures which are essential to ensuring compliance with the applicable state and federal regulations. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: February 16, 2010 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Ridge Road Update ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: There are two options the City Council may take based on the Community Comment by Betsy Robinson at the January 15 City Council Meeting, these are: 1. Request the Ridge Road Residents file a petition to have the City prepare a feasibility Study to reconstruct Ridge Road for the 2011 reconstruction season. 2. Request engineering to prepare feasibility study this fall to reconstruct the roadway for the 2011 reconstruction season. . Info /Background: At the January 15th City Council meeting, Betsy Robinson of 5021 Ridge Road presented a letter from the South Ridge Road Residents that asked the City Council to relook at their roadway. Ms. Robinson also expressed that this issue was raised five years ago. The history for this roadway is as follows: Summer 2004: The condition of Ridge Road was brought to staffs attention due to a storm water issue. Residents on the easterly side of. the roadway were experiencing surface flooding from water leaving the roadway. This roadway is over 40 -years old and is at the end of its useful life. November 15, 2004: Informational meeting was held for the roadway project. This also included Schafer Road reconstruction. Attachments included. Late Novemberi 2004: Staff met with residents to discuss roadway project; options regarding the curb and gutter were discussed. Attachment included. December 21, 2004: Residents presented Ridge Road Construction Homeowner's Resolution to City Council, see attached. April 19, 2005: City Council ordered plans and specifications for Schaefer Road roadway improvements. Ridge Road was not included due to the December 21 letter. April 21, 2005: City Manager, Gordon Hughes sends Sal Mendoza, 5117 Ridge Road, a letter explaining options for Ridge Road, see attached letter. January 15, 2010: Betsy Robinson presents letter to City Council expressing concern over condition of Ridge Road, see attached letter. Staff is recommending that either the residents submit a petition to the City to reconstruct Ridge Road; this would determine the number of votes needed at the City Council when this comes to a public hearing. Or the City Council could request Engineering to prepare a feasibility study for Ridge Road Reconstruction for the 2011 Construction season. g: \engineering \improvements \a199 ridge road\2010 project\20100216 ridge road update rrform.doc Agenda Item V. A. Community Comment Dear Council Members; Our neighborhood held a meeting on January 5th to discuss the condition of our road, the south part of Ridge Road (25 homes).. Twelve households attended and three more confirmed their support, but were unable to attend. Results were that 15 of 25 homeowners agreed to the following: * 1. Upper Ridge Road is in urgent need of pavement repair. We are not seeking a complete road reconstruction at this time. Ridge Road has not been routinely maintained by the city in an adequate manner. It is so full of potholes, bumps, loose gravel and pavements chunks that it makes walking and driving hazardous. Lately we have had a broken ankle, 2 tire blowouts, and over $2000.00 of property damage when a driver "over corrected" after hitting a pothole. All incidents were due to the poor condition of the pavement. The residents believe that the road has now become a danger to our health and safety. We agreed a Mill & Overlay would be an acceptable solution. No M &O has occurred since 1974, other than a small 200 ft. section re- milled about 10 years ago. This part survives intact today and is the only clear part of our street. 2. The neighbors agree that the street should not be widened. It was agreed that any drainage issues should be addressed within the existing width of the road. Previously, drainage issues were a concern for some residents on the east side of the street. Residents in attendance from this side agreed that drainage issues have been corrected at their own expense through various methods. This down -slope side of the street has the added issue of steep entry grades, making any widening of the street impractical and expensive. Ridge Road residents brought up these issues in 2005 at the beginning of the Edina Road Reconstruction. At that time we had a petition signed by 100% of the households, stating our concerns and needs. We were all in agreement that something needed to be done, but Ridge Road has unique conditions that needed to be considered. The Engineering Dept. disregarded our requests, taking us completely off the repair list. As one of the first streets in need of repair 5 years ago, we have had nothing other than a few recurring potholes filled since 2005. Things have gotten much worse! Luckily the city came out and filled a few potholes on December 17th right before the snowfall, but only after a Councilwoman brought our issue to the City Engineer's attention. We appreciate the Council hearing our concerns. It is our greatest hope that we can arrive at a timely and agreeable solution so once again our street will be safe for walking and driving. South Ridge Road has a total Taxable Market Home Value worth $30,938,900, with yearly property taxes of $366,756.00. In its current state of disrepair, Ridge Road does not bode well for the market value of our homes, the safety of the residents or our city's excellent reputation. 19 Sincerely in need of your help, South Ridge Road Residents *Seven other homeowners were out of town, but have shown previous support. ION 4 2ed 3 Sal Mendoza 5117 Ridge Road Edina, MN 55436 Subject: Ridge Road Dear Mr. Mendoza: April 21, 2005 City of Edina Thanks for stopping by last Thursday to discuss your thoughts on Ridge Road. You inquired what could be done to improve the road surface and to correct drainage problems that affect properties on the east side of the road. I agreed to look into the matter with Wayne Houle, our City Engineer. It's appropriate to review the recent history concerning the street. On November 15, 2004, our Engineering staff initiated a neighborhood meeting concerning the street and drainage concerns. On December 21, 2005, representatives of the neighborhood appeared before the City Council under the "Concerns of Residents" portion of the agenda and presented the enclosed resolution. Based upon the resolution and the comments expressed at the meeting, it appeared that the neighborhood was not supportive of the ideas outlined by the engineering staff at the neighborhood meeting. One of the principal issues addressed in the resolution was the neighborhood's desire for the City to assume the financial burden of resurfacing the street. As I mentioned at our meeting last week, we are currently studying our special assessment policies. Our current policy provides that the entire cost of street renovations are financed by way of special assessments against benefited property owners. Although this policy might change based on our study, it would be premature to assume this. Therefore, the neighborhood should assume that it must bear the costs associated with street renovations over and above typical maintenance items such as pothole repair. Ridge Road is in tough shape and has a drainage problem. (I took the opportunity to revisit the street after our meeting last week.) Assuming that the neighborhood does not wish to assume the financial burden of a street reconstruction project, then it seems to me there are three courses of action at the present time: • Petition the City to install a suitable storm sewer system and resurface the street with a new driving surface. The storm sewer system will require a curb or some type of barrier to direct the runoff into the piped system. This system would require disturbing only a small portion of the roadway. The remaining portion of the roadway would be resurfaced using a mill and overlay, which will provide a relatively short-term solution as compared with the street reconstruction proposed at the neighborhood meeting. The storm sewer cost would be bome by the City and the street resurfacing would be a special assessment against the adjacent property owners. City Hall - 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 "A ■II Sal Mendoza April 21, 2005 Page 2 • Petition the City to install storm sewer as described above, but only fill pot holes and patch the street. This would be a maintenance activity and there would be no assessment to property owners. • No storm sewer project. Fill potholes as described above. This would likewise be a maintenance activity. Based upon the backlog of street reconstruction projects facing the City, we have frankly moved on to other projects in the City for the coming construction season. However, after talking with Wayne, he suggested that you hold another neighborhood meeting with our engineering staff to discuss the options in more detail. Let Wayne know if this is desirable and he'd be glad to arrange it. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes i City Manager cc: Wayne Houle, City Engineer 5' Minutes/Edina City Council/December 21, 2004 Streets and referring the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RIDGE ROAD CONSTRUCTION HOMEOWNERS Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road, said there -are 23 homes on Ridge Road and there are 23 signatures on the presented resolution stating they do not want to be included in the City's re- pavement plan. She elaborated that the road is not uniform and at some points is a country lane. One issue in the area is storm water drainage and uneven elevations and residents have spent their own money to alleviate the problem. She suggested Ridge Road be removed from the re- pavement plan. Ridge Road neighbors can work out the problems and maintain the essence of the road. Engineer Houle said staff would analyze the presented resolution and present a feasibility study. He added the issue could be before the Council in the spring. Mayor Maetzold reminded the Council that recently a short street was before the Council for re- surfacing and they were told that if the project were delayed, the price would only increase in later years. Salvador Mendoza, 5117 Ridge Road, voiced support of the neighborhood resolution. He suggested Ridge Road be resurfaced not reconstructed and would allow water to drain naturally and gravitate to catch basins. Mr. Mendoza said he wanted the Council to be aware that the residents of Ridge Road would be taking a proactive approach to the project. Ann Rutledge, 5116 Ridge Road, indicated she believed that at the Engineering informational meeting that a decision would be reached at this meeting. Mr. Houle reiterated that the City is about a month behind schedule and due in part because of the public's input on the projects. Ms. Robinson inquired when the issue would be on the agenda. Mayor Maetzold noted once a hearing date is set, residents would receive notices. No formal Council action was taken. AUDITOR'S COMPLIANCE FORMS - PUBLIC OFFICERS' INTEREST IN CONTRACTS Manager Hughes reminded the Council that the City has selected a new Auditor. He asked that the Council sign Auditor's Compliance Forms, Public Officers' Interest in Contracts forms that have been requested by Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich and Company, P.A. (MMKR). No formal Council action was taken. DATES TO CALENDAR Manager Hughes noted that an official recognition has been planned for Mayor Maetzold and Council Member Kelly, at Braemar Club House on Thursday, January 20, 2005, from 5:00 to 7:00 P.M. Mr. Hughes indicated that a Work Session would be held at 5:30 P.M., January 18, 2005. Mr. Hughes said a point in the Southdale Corridor Study has been reached for the Council and the Planning Commission need to meet. He suggested Saturday, January 29, 2005, at the Senior Center from 8:00 A.M. to 12:00 noon. Page 17 Ridge Road Construction Homeowner's Resolution On Wednesday, December 8`h the homeowners living on Ridge Road met to discuss the proposed redevelopment of our street by the City of Edina. The following resolution was developed and agreed to by of the homeowners. The Ridge Road Homeowners acknowledge that there is a significant problem with storm water run -off, causing property damage to our neighbors which must be resolved, that the City has been negligent in its maintenance of Ridge Road, delaying repairs and redevelopment, which has resulted in Ridge Road now having significant surface problems. In addition, the City has approved property development plans along the road (particularly the west side), which have resulted in the area's inability to contain the storm water run -off, causing flooding of Ridge Road itself, and in particular, causing water to cross the road from West to East, and thereby causing significant erosion and property damage to homes on the East side of the street, which we believe to be a violation of the homeowners rights and protections. The Ridge Road Homeowners, having met with the Edina City Engineers, found the proposed City resolution to this situation unacceptable, including the actual plan of action and the proposed property assessment as it was explained. Many residents on Ridge Road with storm water problems have already spent tens of thousands of dollars to fix property damages due to a lack of a storm water management system. The City has been consistently informed of these water problems and has done very little to correct it. In particular we find the proposed assessment of individual homeowners to finance the proposed repair of this situation to be unprecedented, and a violation of our rights under the existing property taxation structure. It our understanding that the City's proposed assessments are largely due to Ridge Road being completely rebuilt. We don't feel this action is necessary since there is no evidence to suggest that Ridge Road is structurally unsound and we feel that a complete resurfacing after storm water management system installation, with the appropriate pitches and curvatures, should correct the problems experienced on the road way. We therefore propose the following, through a -4 unanimous resolution passed by the Ridge Road Homeowners. Resolved that: we the Ridge Road Homeowners request, and would accept the following: A. That a Storm sewer system be installed on the west side of Ridge Road, to include catch basin grates at the entrance, or adjacent to homeowner's property lines. B. That there will be no change in the width or elevation of the road. C. That no curb or gutters will be installed, but that the road will be resurfaced in a way to preserve the natural look and history of its lines and borders. D. That no new lighting will be added to the Road. 1 of 1 E. That the cost of this project will be paid for out of the Storm Water Management Fund established by the City of Edina. F. That the road will be resurfaced and paid for out of the City's road maintenance management program. In support of the foregoing, we the homeowner on Ridge Road sign this resolution. NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE Dean and Ana Davolis 1 �_ 5009 Ridge Road 945 -7055 Mary and Thm Herman 5008 Ridge Road Paul & Carolyn Wiggin 5013 Ridge Road 935 -5501 Betsy Robinson/Ted Pier '' 5021 Ridge Road 935 -8084 A Chuck & Corky Carlsen 5025 Ridge Road 933 -7249 Molly & John 5101 Ridge Road 933 -8355 Marinovich Joe & Keimay Terry /.� ,; - • (, 5109 Ridge Road 933 -4963 Sal & Mia Mendoza , 5117 Ridge Road 933 -6016 Mike & Peggy Gaard Ou r To LOA/ 5201 Ridge Road 933 -6186 Peter & Maura Brew 5205 Ridge Road 933 -6330 Bernie & Pat Baier - 5208 Ridge Road 933 -8291 Pat & Amy Minea 5204 Ridge Road 932 -9389 Chuck & Diane Bohlig� ; 5200 Ridge Road 933 -0924 Joe & Fluff McErlane C 5120 Ridge Road 933 -4659 Anne Rutledge /Ann 5116 Ridge Road 935 -4845 Charity Perry & Cindy Witkins 1 5112 Ridge Road 938 -7701 Jack &Julie Galvin - , I V �v- 5108 Ridge Road 935 -1529 Dan & Trish Adams )) 5020 Ridge Road 933 -1175 Jim & Celeste Gibson 5016 Ridge Road 939 -6034 2 of 2 John & Julie Rowe 5012 Ridge Road 938 -1012 Jeff & Mary Jo 1 6519 Interlachen Blvd 938 -4450 Sanderson Bill & Leslie Emptage fiCT Interlachen Blvd .09689 &) 7 MAO a%cf- sc-kcl -I- 3 of 3 6100 9s2 93 -S 69 yZ LI 504 -�w� ��,��. PAVsMlmT Stop. ARLA ,df � t Cie �LU� w 0 3 0 =3 cn -n 0 51 �aS�� -0. CD 0 z 0 3 CD I1 CD 0 0 CD M CD Z CD 0 z 4t- 0 a 0 0 CD Ridge Road Information Meeting Comments November 15, 2004 1. Thomas & Mary Herman, 5008 Ridge Road -Would our property values (taxable) be increased due to this improvement? 2. Sal & Mia Mendoza, 5117 Ridge Road -We support keeping the road narrow to reduce traffic speed and avoid driveway problems. Even if the majority of owners reject drainage solutions, please remember the city's responsibility to protect the minority who are being adversely affected by the others.run -off. Thank you for working toward a creative solution. 3. Anne Rutledge, 5116 Ridge Road -1 have about 4 -6 clients a week who come to my house, so knowing the schedule is critical. -1 am in favor of looking at other options to replace the roadway at lower cost, gathering storm water in other ways, and I'm not interested in replacement lighting. 4. Perry Witken, 5112 Ridge Road -My preference would be "not" to have curb and gutter if at all possible. I would rather give up a few feet of yard to allow better drainage into a catch basin system. Also, several people complained about working at home — while a very real problem, I would not consider this project a high inconvenience — certainly not more than a road project for a retail client location. P.S. Excellent meeting and well done. 12— City of Edina November 15, 2004 6:00 — 7:30 pm Neighborhood Informational Meeting Schaefer Road & Ridge Road Improvements Ynprovw wd No. BA-326 Agenda INTRODUCTIONS PURPOSE OF MEETING HISTORY OF PROJECT PROJECT -PLANS •COSTS -ASSESSMENTS WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? YnET=!�N- BA-M Input Opportunities PURPOSE OF MEETING IS TO GATHER PUBLIC INPUT FROM YOU USE POST -IT NOTES AND PLACE ON MAP WRITE DOWN ON COMMENT CARDS * TELL US / PHONE US Z WRITE US/ EMAIL US * SPEAK AT PUBLIC HEARING Ynprowrwd No. BA- M ➢1 !3 Typical Process • Initiation of improvement project by Council (staff) or by petition. • Feasibility Report prepared and accepted by Council. • Ten days notice is sent to affected property owners and legal notice is placed in paper (Edina Sun) prior to the hearing. • Public hearing to order the project is then conducted. Ynprow nt No. BA-326 Typical Process (continued) • Ordering of improvement project requires a majority of Council if petitioned by residents (normally 3 of 5 Council votes if >35% signatures of assessed properties) or 4 of 5 Council votes if project is not initiated by residents (or lacking 35% signatures). • Levy of special assessments is typically held at the completion of the project through a Final Assessment Hearing. knpro -nt No. IBA-326 Project Area • knprov nt No. BA-326 )�-2 1 Project History / Initiation • Project initiated by staff. • Roadway and utilities originally constructed - ranging from 1965 to 1993. • Roadway width: • Ridge Rd. 18 to 21 -ft (north) & 26 to 30 -ft (south) • Schaefer Rd. approximately 28 to 30 -ft • Normal maintenance performed on roadway. • End of I roatd.way typical life expectancy. • Fichaefw � Rdr) aln and service breaks - Rainwater drainage and erosion Issues. Yn No. BA-u! Project Scope • Reconstruct roadways to Include: • Proposed roadway width will approximately match existing width. • New B618 or mountable concrete curb and gutter (both sides) with coloring option for aesthetics — Ridge Rd. north end only. • New concrete driveway aprons - Ridge Rd north. • Update City utilities, watermain, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer. • New sump pump drain file - Schaefer Rd. • New decorative lighting (option) In No. BA US Project Issues • Issues /concerns we do know about: -Rainwater drainage and erosion issues. -Several Water main and service breaks on Schaefer Rd. -Not all residents are In favor of curb and gutter - Ridge Rd. -Possible impacts to mature trees. -Boulders and retaining walls. -inconvenience (e.g. access, dust, noise, periods of no water service, etc.) Ynprommnt No. BA426 ➢3 /S Project Issues (continued) • Issues /concerns we don't know about? -Please forward comments to us. -Let us know your issues. YnprovnwM No. BA-326 Project Issues (continued) Roadway Band -aid Deteriorated Patchwork Ynprov rwM No. BA-326 Project Issues (continued) Rutting on Edge of Drainage Issues Roadway krnprovrn•M No. BA-326 ➢4 l� Project Costs • Project (roadway): -Schaefer Rd. $ 185,000 -Ridge Rd. $ 247,000 • Lighting (Option): $ 90,000 • Utility Cost: Utility Costs are not included in roadway costs. These costs will be funded by the respective utility fund (e.g. water, storm sewer and sanitary sewer) knp'ovwr»M No. BA -]2d ➢5 Assessments Methodology — Neighborhood reconstruction: • Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • Adjacent properties with side or rear yards are assessed 113 REU (Based on address of property). • Decorative lighting within neighborhood would be assessed (not currently included in assessment amount). kwovan"d No. BAO26 Proposed Assessments • Preliminary Estimated Assessment Is not final — will be adjusted based on final construction cost. -Ridge Rd (north) $ 11,600 per REU -Ridge Rd (south) $ 6,000 per REU -Schaefer Rd $ 9,250 per REU . Additional $2,000 per unit for decorative lighting (not Included in assessment amount) • 10 year assessment • 6.5 % Interest on unpaid balance knwavame No. eMUG Proposed Assessments tll...l°, Ill.ler 1111. ■111 M • Iellllw a n+w�waw ➢6 FM 1 t 111 7!11 111 1 1! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 _ 1 1 111 It 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I I W 1 { 01 s.I Ynvovwlwnt No. BA426 ➢6 FM Assessments vs. Market Value oil r..er r rrr rr. va. Io +M � 41�r M �.,M•L1M ' 1 2 1 1 1 1 l i i l 111011 111 I 1 , 1111 1 ri lltl l!!1 1111 /1611111,, t 1 • 1 1 ,, 1111■ 1 , 1„ Ynproverneat No. DA-326 During Construction • What to expect: -Access to homes most days, definitely nightly. • No access for one week when concrete driveway apron is poured. -Disturbed items will be corrected (e.g. sprinkler systems, invisible fences, landscaping, etc.) Ynprowroutt No. BA-326 During Construction (continued) Underground Utility Work Replace Old Hydrants Ynprovwom No. BA-326 )�-7 i During Construction (continued) r.: Underground Limited Material Utility Work Storage Locations knprovun6m No. BA-326 During Construction (continued) Concrete Curb & Concrete Driveway Gutter Aprons Ynprowr nt No BA-U6 During Construction (continued) Impacts to Trees Access Problems Ynprove —M No. BA-326 O Z4/' The Final Product Before Project Schedule Neighborhood Informational Mtg ..... Nov 15, 2004 Council Orders Public Hearing .......Dec 21, 2004 Receive Feasibility Report ...............Dec 21, 2004 Public Hearing .... ............................Jan 18, 2005 Bid Opening .......... .........................Spring 2005 Award Contract ..... .........................Spring 2005 Begin Construction . .........................Spring 2005 Complete Construction ..................October 2005 Ynpro -t No. BA-326 Y9 November 8, 2004 Ridge Road Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 1 Informational Meeting Announcement Ridge Road from Green Farms Rd to Interlachen Blvd City of Edina, Improvement No. A -199 Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process for roadway and utility improvements for your neighborhood. See attached location map. We are hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this project to be held on Monday, November 15th, from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers located at 4801 W. 50th Street. (The Council Chambers is immediately to your left as you enter City Hall.) The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If you are unable to attend, information regarding this project will be available after this meeting. Sincerely, Steve L. Lillehaug Edina Traffic Engineer / Assistant Engineer ZZ MA M w9`A.Zy o e )�n Location Map Ridge Road Reconstruction LIO U-U WATERMAN AVE 8 N W +E Engineering Dept November, 2004 -03 ,y. Otte REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. F. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: February 16, 2010 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Request Commissioner of Action Motion Transportation to Perform Resolution Speed Study of W. 66t' St. from TH100 to Valley View ❑ Ordinance Rd. ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to sign attached resolution requesting that the Commissioner of Transportation perform a speed study on West 66th Street from TH100 to Valley View Road. Info /Background: In the March 8, 2007, Traffic Safety Report, a recommendation was made to request that the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) perform a speed study along West 66th Street from TH100 to Valley View Road for consideration of reducing the speed limit from 35 to 30 mph. Changing speed limits on city streets must be authorized by MNDOT. Attached is a copy of the March 8, 2007, Traffic Safety Report. g:\ engineering\ infrastructure \streets \traffic \studies \speed studies \west 66th street from th100 to valley view road\20100216 council request rrform.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2010-27 REQUESTING THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION PERFORM A SPEED STUDY ON WEST 66TH STREET FROM TH100 TO VALLEY VIEW ROAD City of Edina WHEREAS, West 66h Street is a Municipal State Aid route located in Edina; and WHEREAS, the speed limit on West 66th Street is 35 mph; and WHEREAS, West 66th Street is primarily located in a residential setting; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council is requesting that the Commissioner of Transportation perform a speed study on West 66th'Street from TH100 to Valley View Road for consideration of reducing the speed limit to 30 mph. Dated: February 16, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 16, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.corn TTY 952 - 826 -0379 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Thursday, March 8, 2007 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on March 8, 2007. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the March 20, 2007 Council Agenda. SECTION A• Requests on which staff recommends approval: 1. Request to restrict parking in the off - street parking area on Kellogg Avenue just to the north of Valley View Road (northwest corner of intersection). Request comes from a resident on Kellogg Avenue who is concerned with vehicles parking in this area for long periods of time, including overnight. The area in question is a small cut -back parking area with eight striped parking spaces directly across from 6133 Kellogg Avenue. There are currently no parking restrictions in this area. The 6100 block of Kellogg Avenue is restricted to "One Hour Parking Monday Thru Friday 8 AM to 4 PM." These restrictions apply to both sides of the street. The small parking area in question allows customers of the corner businesses to park for more than one hour. The "One Hour" restriction on the 6100 block of Kellogg Avenue was approved by the City Council on September 16, 1996, at the request of residents via petition. Residents expressed concern that parking during the daytime was fully utilized on the south half of the block. Residents further stated that many times these parked vehicles infringed on their driveways. After further study and review by the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee, staff recommends the following: Traffic Safety Staff Review March 8, 2007 Pagel of 5 H Staff recommends that signs be posted in the small cut -back parking area on the northwest corner of Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road with the following restrictions: "No Parking 10 PM to 8 AM. 2. Request to reduce the speed limit on W. 66th Street between Valley View Road and Highway 100 from its current posting of 35 MPH to 30 MPH. Request comes from a resident in the 4200 block of west 66th Street with a petition signed by seven other homeowners. These residents are concerned with the speed and the volume of vehicles traveling along 66th Street at speeds of 35 MPH and higher. Requestor states that other streets in the area ( W. 64th Street, Valley View Road, W. 70th Street and East Frontage Road) are all posted 30 MPH. Requestor sees no reason to have an increased speed limit along this small stretch of roadway (speed is reduced to 30 MPH west of Highway 100). Requestor also cites the high volume of pedestrians in the area due to its unique location (Rosland Park, play ground, swimming pool and Lake Cornelia), all attracting a large number of visitors, walkers, bikers and joggers. A large number of pedestrians, mostly children, cross W. 66th Street to get to the park. Requestor states that the sidewalk along W. 66th Street is extremely close to the road which could possibly cause a dangerous situation. W. 66th Street, east of Valley View Road is a divided four lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 MPH that chokes down to two lanes immediately west of Valley View Road where the speed limit increases to 35 MPH. The average Monday thru Friday daily traffic count on this section of W. 66th Street is 6,234 with an 85th percentile speed of 38.1 MPH. There have been nine reported traffic accidents from 2000 -2005 (4- injury and 5- property damage). No pedestrian accidents have been reported. Statistics for 2006 to the present have not yet been obtained. Staff checked records as far back as 1975 and could not find a date when the 35 MPH speed limit had been established. A similar request was made in June of 1999 and was denied (staff felt that the 35 MPH speed was appropriate and requested that the police department step up enforcement). W. 66th Street between Valley View Road and Highway 100 is classified as a city "Collector" street. Changing speed limits on city streets must be authorized by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. After much study and review, staff recommends the following: Traffic Safety Staff Review March 8, 2007 Page 2 of 5 Staff recommends that the City of Edina make a formal request to Speed Study on W. 66'u Street between Valley View Road and Highway 100 to determine a safe driving speed while achieving maximum traffic flow. 3. Request to reduce the speed limit on Vernon Avenue between Villa Way and View Lane from the current posting of 40 MPH to 30 MPH. This request comes from two residents (one on Glengarry Pkwy. and another on Schaefer Road). Both residents feel that the higher speed limit on this stretch of Vernon Avenue is not needed. W. 5& StreetfVernon Avenue has a speed limit of 30 MPH from France Avenue to Villa Way. The speed limit increases to 40 MPH from Villa Way west to View Lane. Speeds reduce back to 30 MPH west of View Lane. Staff has checked records back to 1975 and was unable to find a date when this speed limit was established. Both residents feel that the additional speed is not needed and that it only increases accident severity. Vernon Avenue (County Road 158) is classified as an "A" Minor Arterial Reliever Street. It has a Monday thru Friday average daily traffic count of 10,400 vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 44.5 MPH (in 40 MPH zone). There have been 25 reported accidents in the 40 MPH zone from 1/1/2000 to 6/17/06. Accidents are broken down as follows: 4 Injury accidents 6 Possible injury accidents 15 Property damage accidents There were 17 accidents, during the same time period, reported in the 30 MPH zone east of Villa Way: 1 Injury accident 2 Possible injury accidents 14 Property damage accidents There were 6 accidents, during the same time period, reported in the 30 MPH zone west of View Lane: Traffic Safety Staff Review March 8, 2007 Possible injury accident Property damage accidents Page 3 of 5 Requestor further states that the 40 MPH zone on Vernon Avenue is in an area where there are hills, curves and residences with blind drives. Requestor states that the 40 MPH portion of Vernon Avenue is only 1.3 miles long and it takes approximately 156 seconds to traverse this distance at 30 MPH. It takes approximately 117 seconds at 40 MPH (not verified by staff). Requestor states that legislation enacted in 2006 (169.224) permits "Neighborhood Electric Vehicles" to be operated on roadways with posted speed limits of 35 MPH or less. He states that such vehicles are becoming popular in Edina and preventing them from using Vernon Avenue poses an unfair burden on those seeking to reduce the use of imported fuel and to help preserve our environment. After much study and review, staff recommends the following: Staff recommends that the City of Edina make a formal request to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, through Hennepin County, to conduct a traffic speed study on Vernon Avenue between Villa Way and View Lane to determine a safe driving speed while achieving maximum traffic flow. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: 1. Request to evaluate the intersection of Code Avenue and W. 56`h Street and add some type of advanced warning sign to alert drivers to a blind intersection. Requestor is a resident on Code Avenue who states he has witnessed near accidents at the intersection of Code Avenue and W. 50h Street from northbound vehicles. Requestor feels that this intersection is "blind" and that some type of warning signs should be installed to alert drivers. Code Avenue is a 26 -foot wide city street with an average Monday thru Friday daily traffic count of 1,096 vehicles. Code Avenue has no curb, gutter or sidewalks. Code Avenue is a through street at the intersection of W. 56th Street. Code Avenue has a slight downhill grade south of W. 56`h Street. There have been no reported accidents since 2000. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 5 March 8, 2007 W. 56th Street is a 26 -foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. It has an average Monday thru Friday daily traffic count of 823 vehicles with an 85`h percentile speed of 29.5 MPH. W. 56`h Street at Code Avenue is controlled with a two -way stop. There have been no reported accidents since 2000. Code Avenue at W. 56th Street is a controlled intersection. Sight lines are adequate for anyone who uses due caution while approaching from all directions. The grade on Code Avenue to the south of W. 56th Street is not steep enough to warrant an advanced hill warning sign. SECTION C• Requests that are deferred to a later date for referred to others. None for March 8, 2007 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review March 8, 2007 Page 5 of 5 To: Mayor & City Council From: Joyce Repya Associate Planner Date: February 16, 2010 Subject: Metropolitan Council's Family Affordable Housing Program REVISED AGREEMENT Recommended Action. KEYUKl %KLC.:UMB Agenda Item IV. G. Consent ATIUN Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion F] Ordinance Discussion Authorize signature and execution of a REVISED Amendment to the Cooperation Agreement for the Metropolitan Council Family Affordable Housing Program. (See attached Agreement.) Information/Background: The original Amendment to the Cooperation Agreement was authorized for execution at the January 19, 2010 meeting. Since that time, the Metropolitan Council has revised the Agreement document and requests execution of new Agreement. (See attached explanation from Met Council.) 1 Joyce Repya From: Smith, Terri [terri.smith @metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:16 PM To: Joyce Repya Subject: RE: Final Amendment Absolutely — the main item is changing the reference to "Section 8 Project -Based Vouchers (PBV)" to "Section 8 assisted units ". The PBV program is a component of the broader Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. Some of the other language was just cleaning up what was already there and re- wording a bit. The effective date changed from October 1, 2009 to effective on the date of final execution by the Council. The main points of the conversion are: 1. This is really just a change in funding streams. Rather than getting funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Public Housing program, the funding will come from the Section 8 side of HUD. 2. The Council will continue to own the units and continue to hire a management company to provide day -to -day management services. 3. The Communities and neighbors will not notice any change from this Conversion. 4. It is a "win win" for everyone. The Council will have more money to operate and maintain the units while still providing the valuable affordable housing resource. Terri Terri Smith Metro HRA • Acting Manager Phone (651) 602 -1187 • Fax (651) 602 -1313 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 t erri. sinith @met c. state. nin. US From: Joyce Repya [mailto:JRepya @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:44 PM To: Smith, Terri Subject: RE: Final Amendment Thanks, Terri. We have a Council meeting next Tuesday, so the timing is good. Would you mind giving me an explanation regarding why Met Council is revising the agreement, and perhaps pointing out the differences between the agreement they previously approved? I know they will be asking those questions. Thanks!! - -Joyce Joyce Repya Associate Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0462 ireova(@ci.edina.mn.us www.citvofedina.com From: Smith, Terri [ mailto :terri.smith @metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:25 PM To: Joyce Repya Subject: Final Amendment Hi Joyce — Attached is a final copy of the Amendment to the Cooperation Agreement for signature. After your Council approves the document, it will need to be signed by the Mayor and City Manager. You can then route to my attention. I will get it signed here and send you a copy for your files. If you have questions or concerns, please let me know. Thanks Joyce! Terri Smith Metro BRA • Acting Manager Phone (651) 602 -1187 • Fax (651) 602 -1313 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 terri. srni.th @ii7etc:state. s7.n. us AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIONAGREEMENT Metropolitan Council Family Affordable Housing Program THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the Metropolitan Council, [the "Council "] and the City of Edina [the "Municipality "]. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Council is a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and, through its Metro HRA unit, exercises housing and redevelopment authority powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.195; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Minnesota Statutes sections 469.001 to 469.047 and of all other laws relating to housing and redevelopment authorities apply to the Council when the Council is functioning as an authority; and WHEREAS, the Council owns and operates 150 Family Affordable Housing Program scattered site housing units ( "FAHP" Units ") within eleven communities in Anoka, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2001 the Council and the Municipality entered into a federally required Cooperation Agreement that relates to the acquisition and operation of the eight (8) FAHP Units located within the corporate limits of the Municipality and local cooperation required by the U.S. Department of Housing and urban Development ( "HUD ") pursuant to the U.S. Housing Act of 1937; and WHEREAS, the development, operation and maintenance of the FAHP Units within the Municipality originally were funded under the federal public housing program; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2001 the Metropolitan Council and the Municipality also entered into a Supplemental Agreement with respect to the acquisition and operation of the FAHP Units within the Municipality, including eight (8) FAHP units located within the Municipality; and WHEREAS, the development, operation and maintenance of the FAHP Units within the Municipality originally were funded under the federal public housing program; and WHEREAS, to help preserve the FAHP Units as financially viable housing for low- or moderate - income families into the future, the Council applied to HUD for approval to voluntarily convert its FAHP Units from public housing units to Section 8 assisted units; and WHEREAS, HUD has approved the Council's application to convert its 150 FAHP Units to Section 8 assisted units; and WHEREAS, the conversion will not result in the disposition of the FAHP units and the Council will continue to own and operate the FAHP units; and Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, the conversion will not result in the displacement or relocation of any families living in the FAHP Units who are eligible for Section 8 housing assistance and the units will continue to be leased to eligible persons of low- or moderate - income and their families under applicable state or federal legislation; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan and the Municipality agree the Cooperation Agreement should be continued with appropriate modification and clarifications to reflect the FAHP Units' status as Section 8 assisted units; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants in this agreement, the Municipality and Council agree as follows: 1. Pursuant to HUD's approval of the Council's conversion application and Minnesota Statutes section 473.195, subdivision 1, the FAH? Units within the Municipality may be operated or administered by the Council as Section 8 assisted units. 2. The April 2001 Cooperation Agreement is modified, clarified and amended as follows: (a) Notwithstanding the various references in the Cooperation Agreement to federal statutory provisions governing the federal public housing program, the FAHP Units will be operated and maintained pursuant to the federal statutory and regulatory provisions governing the Section 8 housing assistance program. The FAHP Units are residential housing units eligible for federal rental subsidies pursuant to Title 42 United States Code section 1437f(o), Title 24 Code of federal Regulations parts 982 or 983, and Minnesota Statutes section 469.018, subdivision 3. (b) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 469.040, subdivision 1 and other applicable law, each FAHP Unit is exempt from all real and personal property taxes of the Municipality, the county, the State of Minnesota, or any political subdivision of the State. (c) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 469.040, subdivision 3, so long as the FAHP Units are owned by the Council, the Council shall make, or cause to be made, payments in lieu of taxes ( "Payments in Lieu of Taxes ") in payment for the public services and facilities furnished from time to time without other cost or charge for or with respect to each FAHP Unit. Each Payment in Lieu of Taxes shall be made at the time when real property taxes on a FAHP Unit would be paid if the FAHP Unit were subject to taxation, and shall be in an amount equal to ten percent (10 %) of the shelter rent charged with respect to the FAHP Unit during the preceding calendar year. A Payment in Lieu of Taxes for a FAHP Unit may not exceed the amount which would be payable in taxes if the FAHP Unit were not exempt from real or personal property taxes. Except for these modifications, clarifications and amendments, the provisions of the Cooperation Agreement shall remain in force and effect without change. Page 2 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality and the Council have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. This agreement is effective on the date of final execution by the Council. Approved as to form: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL al Deputy General Counsel Thomas H. Weaver, Regional Administrator Date: CITY OF EDINA IM James Hovland, Mayor Date: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Date: Page 3 of 3 Previ o u.S rLGwt",�& 1- I�I-Ia AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIONAGREEMENT Metropolitan Council Family Affordable Housing Program THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the Metropolitan Council, [the Metropolitan Council] and the City of Edina, Minnesota [Municipality]. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized by Minn. Stat. §473.195 to exercise the functions, rights, duties, privileges, immunities and limitations as are provided for housing and redevelopment authorities created by municipalities; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with its Family Affordable Housing Program [FAHP] the Metropolitan Council sought to acquire up to 20 residential housing units on a scattered site basis in the Municipality [FAH? Units]; WHEREAS, the governing body of the Municipality granted approval of the acquisition of the FAHP Units located in the Municipality; WHEREAs, on April 18, 2001 the Metropolitan Council and the Municipality entered into a Cooperation Agreement with respect to the acquisition and operation of the FAHP Units within the Municipality; WHEREAS, on April 18, 2001 the Metropolitan Council and the Municipality entered into a Supplemental Agreement regarding the FAH? Units within the Municipality; WHEREAS, since its inception, FAH? has been a public housing program funded under 42 U.S.C. §1437a; WHEREAS, in order to best preserve the FAHP Units as financially viable housing for low- income families into the future, the Metropolitan Council applied to HUD for approval to voluntarily convert the 150 FAHP Units from public housing units to Section 8 Project -based Vouchers which will continue to be owned by the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, HUD has approved the conversion of the FAH? Units to Section 8 Project - based Vouchers effective January 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council and the Municipality have agreed to amend the Loan Agreement to provide for the conversion of the FAHP Units to Section 8 Project -based Vouchers. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the Metropolitan Council and the Municipality agree that the Cooperation Agreement and the Supplemental Agreement, shall be amended as follows: Page 1 of 4 1. The Municipality consents to the conversion of the FAHP Units to units assisted under the Section 8 Project -based Voucher Program as set forth in 42 U.S.C. §1437f, and 24 C.F.R. Part 983 to be operated as PHA owned units under 24 C.F.R. §983.59. 2. Section 1(a) shall be amended to read: 1. Whenever used in this Agreement: (a) The term "FAH? Units" shall mean up to twenty (20) residential housing units located on a scattered -site basis within the corporate limits of the Municipality, developed or acquired by the Metropolitan Council in connection with the Family Affordable Housing Program with financial assistance of the United States of America through the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development [the Government] through the Section 8 Project - based Voucher Program, 42 U.S.C. §1347f(o)(13) and 24 C.F.R. Part 983, and owned and operated by the Metropolitan Council as PHA owned units pursuant to 24 C.F.R. §983.59. 3. Section 3(a) shall be amended to read: (a) Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §469.040, and applicable regulations, each FAH? Unit is exempt from all real and personal property taxes levied or imposed by any Taxing Body for so long as either (i) the FAHP Unit is owned by a public body or government agency and is used for housing assisted under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. §1437f(o)(13); (ii) any contract between the Metropolitan Council and the Government in connection with the FAHP Unit remains in force and effect; or (iii) any bonds issued in connection with the FAHP Unit or any monies due to the Government in connection with the FAHP Unit remain unpaid, which every period is the longest [the Exemption Period]. 4. Section 9 shall be amended to read: 9. During the Exemption Period, this Agreement shall not be abrogated, changed or modified without the consent of the Government. The privileges and obligations of the Municipality and other Taxing Bodies shall remain in full force and effect with respect to the FAHP Units so long as the beneficial title to the FAHP Units is held by the Metropolitan Council or by another public body or governmental agency, including the Government, authorized by law 'to engage in the development or administration of housing as defined in 42 U.S.C. §1437a(b)(1) or 42 U.S.C. §1437f(o)(13), If at any time the beneficial title to, or possession of, a FAHP Unit is held by such other public body or governmental agency, including the Government, the provisions of this Agreement shall Page 2 of 4 inure to the benefit of and may be enforced by, such other public body or governmental agency, including the Government. 5. Section 2 of the Supplemental Agreement shall be amended to read: 2. If the FAHP Units located within the Municipality no longer are used for public housing purposes or assisted under the Section 8 Project -based Voucher Program and are not made available to eligible families under a home ownership program, the Metropolitan Council will first offer the FAHP Units to the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for acquisition by the Authority. If the Authority chooses not to acquire the FAHP Units, the Metropolitan Council will then offer the FAHP Units to the East Edina Housing Foundation for acquisition by the Foundation. The Authority's and the Foundation's ability to acquire the FAHP Units pursuant to this provision is subject to any applicable federal or state laws and any applicable HUD regulations and polices governing the sale or other disposition of public housing units. 6. Except for these amendments, the provisions of the Cooperation Agreement and the Supplemental Agreement between the Metropolitan Council and the Municipality shall remain in full force and effect. 7. This Agreement is effective as of January 1, 2010. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their authorized representatives. Dated: .2010 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By Thomas H. Weaver Regional Administrator Page 3 of 4 Dated: , 2010 CITY OF EDINA By_ Its By Its Page 4 of 4 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3 /2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 1 2/412010 - 2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 331256 214/2010 100613 AAA 57.00 LICENSE TAB RENEWALS 229479 012710 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.00 331257 21412010 125198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 80.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229587 013010 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 80.00 331258 2/4/2010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 40.80 229411 0805009 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 40.80 331259 214/2010 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 55.69 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 229480 7132 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.69 331260 214/2010 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 96.43 PEST CONTROL , 00006433 229588 548909 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 96.43 331261 2/4/2010 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 150.00 REMOTE CONTROLS 00008069 229660 33230-51 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 150.00 331262 214/2010 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 191.90 COFFEE 229481 126022 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 191.90 331263 2/4/2010 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 563.90 EVENT BROCHURES 229589 80082 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 563.90 331264 214/2010 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 340.70 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 00002195 229590 6626 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 340.70 331265 21412010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 763.20 INSTRUCTOR AC 229689 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 763.20 331266 2/412010 122042 AMERICAN ATHLETIC SHOE CO. INC 905.23 ICE SKATES 00002397 229591 SI- 100542 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 COMPUTER MOUNT IN SQUAD 229486 567905 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 229.10 CITY OF EDINA 106015 ATHLETICA INC. 316.32 GOAL PADS 00008039 229487 0030212 -IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 316.32 331275 21412010 Council Check Register 112.32 BUSINESS CARDS 229592 467 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.32 331276 21412010 100642 BANNERS TO GO 214/2010 -2/412010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 905.23 331267 2/4/2010 101681 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 535.00 APA 8 AICP DUES - CARY TEAGUE 229337 085192- 091101 1140.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 535.00 331268 21412010 101479 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. 192.32 BAILER MAINTENANCE 229482 2088 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 192.32 BAILER MAINTENANCE 229483 2090 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 192.32 BAILER MAINTENANCE 229484 2089 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 576.96 331269 21412010 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 6,293.00 PREMIUM 229338 6100000117119 1550.6200 INSURANCE 6,293.00 331270 21412010 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 957.78 FOOD 229339 1291031 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 72.18- CREDIT 229661 1266785 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 885.60 331271 214/2010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 227.76 COFFEE 229340 415238 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 227.76 331272 2/4/2010 124419 ARIZONA GUN RUNNERS 985.00 SWAT DUTY AMMO 229485 012610 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 985.00 331273 21412010 124846 ASSEMBLED PRODUCTS CORPORATION 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page- 2 Business Unit PLANNING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GRILL GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 229.10 COMPUTER MOUNT IN SQUAD 229486 567905 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 229.10 331274 21412010 106015 ATHLETICA INC. 316.32 GOAL PADS 00008039 229487 0030212 -IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 316.32 331275 21412010 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 112.32 BUSINESS CARDS 229592 467 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.32 331276 21412010 100642 BANNERS TO GO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3 /2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 3 214/2010 -214/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 142.27 LETTERING FOR SIGNS 00001489 229341 29399 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 142.27 331277 214/2010 125190 BEDDOR, WILLIAM 70.00 REFUND FOR GOLF 229574 012810 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 70.00 331278 2/4/2010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,161.92 229412 51925400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,994.77 229413 51929000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 314.65 229414 51853200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.53 229415 83228800 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 119.13 229416 83228700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,598.00 331279 2/4/2010 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 493.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229690 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 493.00 331280 21412010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 27.23 STAPLE REMOVERS 229342 WO- 599232 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 259.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229343 WO- 598933 -11 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 27.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229344 WO- 598956 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 476.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229488 WO- 600175 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229489 WO- 600191 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 800.89 331281 2/412010 125209 BISEK, KATIE 58.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229763 012910 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 58.00 331282 21412010 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 109.99 2010 UNIFORM PURCHASE 22949D 012810 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 109.99 331283 21412010 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 229332 020410 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 331284 2/4/2010 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 200.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229691 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 200.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 87.94 GRILL CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES 331286 2/4/2010 5410.6235 125141 BOBCAT OF WEST METRO Council Check Register 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,587.79 BLADE AND CONTROL KIT 00002380 21412010 - 7/4/2010 34329 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 331285 214/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 125138 BOLK ENTERPRISES INC. 51.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001500 229491 56928 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229662 55335 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.51 PENS 229663 55394 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page- 4 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5421.6406 87.94 GRILL 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 331286 2/4/2010 5410.6235 125141 BOBCAT OF WEST METRO GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,587.79 BLADE AND CONTROL KIT 00002380 229492 34329 5410.6107 3,587.79 GOLF ADMINISTRATION 331287 2/4/2010 125138 BOLK ENTERPRISES INC. 2,447.44 FOLDING MACHINE 229345 M13534 270.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 229346 M13535 2,717.44 331288 2/4/2010 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 3,717.48 LEGAL 229767 43847 17,625.00 LEGAL 229768 43846 21, 342.48 331289 2/4/2010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 28.70 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003661 229593 80368655 3,912.67 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003661 229594 87121221 3,941.37 331290 21412010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 35.49 ADDITIVES 00001517 229493 368781 39.04 BAND ASSEMBLY 00001304 229595 370043 221.19 BAND FUEL 00001304 229596 370495 295.72 331291 2/4/2010 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 9.82 PETTY CASH 229597 012910 43.02 PETTY CASH 229597 012910 44.00 PETTY CASH 229597 012910 46.10 PETTY CASH 229597 012910 47.91 PETTY CASH 229597 012910 89.25 PETTY CASH 229597 012910 280.10 331292 21-4- -'q 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page- 4 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 214/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 75.00 1/25/10 RENTAL 229598 1800 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 75.00 1/26/10 RENTAL 229599 1800 -1 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 1330.6215 5112.6103 5110.6103 5842.5514 5842.5515 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 213/2010 7:49:56 Page- 5 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1318.6525 150.00 SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT 331293 214/2010 1318.6525 101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC. SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 1,066.61 TESTER FOR MMU 00001428 229347 019660 SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,066.61 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 331294 214/2010 SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 102046 CAMPS, HARRIET SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 32.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 229692 012810 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229692 012810 212.00 331295 21412010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,173.40 229417 18781 56.50 229418 18779 2,229.90 331296 2/4/2010 100677 CARGILL INC. 7,129.51 DEICER SALT 00005071 229348 2705349 20,378.03 ICE CONTROL SALT 00005070 229494 2713568 15,208.05 ICE CONTROL SALT 00005070 229495 2698012 13,604.02 ICE CONTROL SALT 00005070 229496 2696252 4,260.18 DEICER 00005071 229600 2726944 3,459.89 ICE CONTROL 00005070 229601 2728559 21,989.91 ICE CONTROL 00005070 229602 2727465 2,173.12 DEICER 00005070 229603 2728163 88,202.71 331297 2/412010 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 131.03 UNIFORM PURCHASE 229604 012810 131.03 331298 2/412010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 874.80 229419 85006 236.00 229420 84812 255.46 229536 85033 1,366.26 331299 21412010 100681 CATCO 577.55 CARTRIDGES, VALVE KITS 00001523 229497 3 -85082 577.55 1330.6215 5112.6103 5110.6103 5842.5514 5842.5515 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 213/2010 7:49:56 Page- 5 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1400.6203 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 1553.6530 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 346.50 CITY OF EDINA 331304 7J4/2010 Council Check Register 2/4/2010 - 2/4/2010 229573 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 331300 21412010 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 214/2010 120433 COMCAST 8,803.98 5591458 -4 229349 5591458 -1/10 1551.6186 HEAT 165667- 1/10 5424.6406 13,847.77 8034001 -1 229350 8034001 -1/10 1552.6186 HEAT 4,036.19 5546504 -1 229498 5546504 -1/10 1470.6186 HEAT 1,726.03 5584304 -9 229605 5584304 -1/10 7411.6186 HEAT 1444549 1550.6200 10.50 5590919 -6 229606 5590919 -1110 7413.6582 FUEL OIL 63.30 5584310.6 229607 5584310 =1/10 7413.6186 HEAT 13,847.77 8034001 -1 229664 8034001 -2010 1552.6186 HEAT 163681 5410.6122 269.83 5596524-8 229665 5596524 - 01/10 5430.6186 HEAT 42,605.37 331308 2/412010 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 331301 214/2010 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 3,446.67 ENVELOPES, LETTERHEAD 229352 00052227 5410.6575 498.68 ENVELOPES 229581 25701 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 498.68 331302 21412010 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 1,037.29 ASPHALT MIX 00001506 229666 112706 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 1,037.29 331303 21412010 116304 CLAY, DON 213/2010 7:49:56 Page- 6 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF FIRE TOWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 346.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 229693 012810 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO PARK ADMIN. GENERAL RANGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 346.50 331304 7J4/2010 125189 CLINTON, THOMAS 70.00 REFUND FOR GOLF 229573 012810 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 70.00 331306 214/2010 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 229608 165667- 1/10 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.95 331306 214/2010 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL 660.00 PREMIUM 229667 1444549 1550.6200 INSURANCE 660.00 331307 21412010 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 MARKETING SERVICES 229351 163681 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 100.00 331308 2/412010 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 3,446.67 ENVELOPES, LETTERHEAD 229352 00052227 5410.6575 PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL RANGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 1,788.76 CITY OF EDINA 331314 Council Check Register 102831 DEX EAST 2/4/2010 -214/2010 139.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 237.50 650243624 3,446.67 650243624 -1/10 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 331309 214/2010 110350670 125183 CROW RIVER LIGHTING SERVICES 110350670 -1/10 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 906.16 BULBS 00008053 229499 79 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 331315 906.16 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 331310 21412010 100703 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS 3,415.19 REFUSE 229764 1066174 4095.6103 36.10 SWITCHES 00001556 229609 13175 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 229765 1061546 36.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,111.86 331311 214/2010 104020 DALCO 331316 21412010 102659 DPD 191.31 DEGREASER 00001411 229610 2171415 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 323.86 194.51 SANITIZER, DISPENSER 00002002 229611 2174034 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 148.23 TOWELS 00009138 229711 2175544 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 331317 345.21 CLEANERS, TISSUE 00009138 229712 2171414 •5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 879.26 331312 21412010 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 21312010 7:49:56 Page - 7 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 162.00 229421 119146 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 162.00 331313 21412010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,743.96 229422 537773 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 229423 537774 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,788.76 331314 21412010 102831 DEX EAST 139.00 650487671 229501 650487671 -1/10 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 237.50 650243624 229612 650243624 -1/10 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 18.40 110350670 229613 110350670 -1/10 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 394.90 331315 214/2010 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,415.19 REFUSE 229764 1066174 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,696,67 REFUSE 229765 1061546 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,111.86 331316 21412010 102659 DPD 323.86 REGISTRATION FORMS 00008060 229500 E33646011 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 323.86 331317 2/4/2010 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register .2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 140.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229694 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CUSTOMER REFUND CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page- 8 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ADAPTIVE RECREATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 140.00 331318 2/4/2010 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 188.10 FLAGSTICK COVERS 00006382 229353 0090312 -IN 5422.6406 188.10 331319 214/2010 125188 EDINA ART CENTER 216.00 SUPER SUNDAY ACTIVITY 12/06 229668 121009 1629.6406 216.00 331320 21412010 125193 EDINA REALTY TITLE 144.61 REFUND -5609 SCHAEFER RD 229578 UTILITY 5900.2015 144.61 331321 21412010 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 534.91 E -83 REPAIRS 229614 46840 1470.6180 534.91 331322 2/412010 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 769.50 RISER RINGS 00005699 229669 MM5632 5923.6406 769.50 331323 21412010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12.07 GASKET MAKER 00001531 229502 69 -003827 1553.6530 36.20 GASKET MAKER 00001531 229503 1- 3272976 1553.6530 48.27 331324 2/412010 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 11.91 SHIPPING CHARGES 229615 9 -477 -29938 1400.6406 11.91 331325 21412010 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 973.52 FILTERS 229616 33405 7411.6406 973.52 331326 214/2010 119211 FIRSTLAB 144.00 DRUG SCREENING 229354 00207131 1550.6121 144.00 331327 2/412010 101603 FLAHERTY S HAPPY TYME CO. 157.50 229731 011510STMT 5822.5515 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CUSTOMER REFUND CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page- 8 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ADAPTIVE RECREATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 157.50 331328 21412010 103985 FLOR, JON 225.00 AD DESIGN 229504 2190 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GEN ADAPTIVE REC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSURANCE INSURANCE 213/2010 7:49:56 Page- 9 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 225.00 331329 21412010 125191 FLOWERS, QUENTON 70.00 REFUND FOR GOLF 229575 012810 1600.4390.15 70.00 331330 21412010 118896 FRYKMAN, LAURA 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229695 012810 5110.6103 300.00 331331 214/2010 120534 GALLAGHER STANTON 111,728.00 PREMIUM 229355 460034 1550.6200 83,803.00 PREMIUM 229356 460033 1550.6200 195,531.00 331332 21412010 102456 GALLS INC. 164.13 BINOCULARS 229617 510377216 1400.6406 161.98 BINOCULARS 229618 510375833 1400.6406 326.11 331333 21412010 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 132.30 INSTRUCTOR AC 229696 012810 5110.6103 132.30 331334 21412010 124541 GEYEN GROUP 240.47 CLEANING 00006431 229619 2473 5420.6511 240.47 331335 21412010 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229670 012810 5110.6103 180.00 331336 214/2010 102385 GOLF MINNESOTA 675.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE AD 229357 01007 5410.6122 675.00 331337 214/2010. 101103 GRAINGER 43.24 PRESSURE WASH NOZZLES 00006168 229358 9159154468 5422.6406 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSURANCE INSURANCE 213/2010 7:49:56 Page- 9 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 229424 00024367 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 659.00 Council Check Register 163.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229713 331339 2/4/2010 120201 GRANICUS INC. 214/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 87.90- CREDIT 00006419 229359 9158570284 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.97 BULBS 00006419 229360 9159154450 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 116.49 BULBS 00006419 229361 9161126629 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.44 HANGER PLATES, HANGERS, ROD 00001492 229362 9163852420 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 73.54 CIRCUIT BREAKER FINDER 00001492 229363 9163852438 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 18.67 FUSE PULLER 00001486 229505 9164167984 5913.6556 TOOLS 123.06 WELDING KIT 00001413 229506 9163732333 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 128.82 EAR PLUGS, LIGHTS 229620 9165969289 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 648.80 FLUORESCENT LAMPS 229621 9165322653 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 324.40 FLUORESCENT LAMPS 229622 9165322612 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,297.59 FLUORESCENT LAMPS 229623 9165322620 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 240.48 LAMPS 229624 9165322646 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,048.60 331338 21412010 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page - 10 Business Unit I:LUti r/UUJt CLUB HOUSE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION PSTF RANGE PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 659.00 229424 00024367 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 659.00 163.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229713 331339 2/4/2010 120201 GRANICUS INC. 5840.6107 163.50 829.64 FEB WEBSTREAMING 229364 16364 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 331340 21412010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC INSTRUCTOR AC 229697 012810 5110.6103 615.75 229732 116060 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,142.50 229733 116059 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.483.00 229734 116063 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 331341 21412010 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 163.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229713 012910 5840.6107 163.50 331342 214/2010 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229697 012810 5110.6103 100.00 331343 21412010 125202 HAUGO GEO TECHNICAL SERVICES L 1,927.25 SOIL AND CEMENT TESTING 229671 48 5800.1720 1,927.25 331344 2/4/2010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,501.25 TONKAZORB 00005451 229625 3089166 5915.6586 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDINGS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3 /2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 11 2/4/2010 —2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,501.25 331345 21412010 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 30.00 SUPPLIES 229698 012810 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 225.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 229698 012810 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 255.00 331346 21412010 103638 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 60.00 TRAINING 229626 00192670 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 331347 2/412010 119154 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 39.95 SEMINAR - MAR 11 00001470 229714 012810 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 39.95 331348 2/4/2010 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 518.04 CLEANERS 00002198 229627 6180106 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 518.04 331349 2/412010 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 564.50 229425 510989 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 564.50 331350 2/412010 125192 HOPE, NAKEKA 70.00 CLASS REFUND 229577 012710 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 70.00 331351 21412010 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 4,249.00 PREMIUM 229365 67804 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,249.00 331352 21412010 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 237.51 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229715 020110 1240.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 237.51 331353 2/4/2010 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 215.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229716 020110 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 215.00 331354 2/4/2010 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 293.10 PHONES/INTERNET 229628 6393910 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 293.10 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 331355 2/412010 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 100.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 -214/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 229336 020410 331356 21412010 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 1,102.00 ICE RESCUE SUIT 00003651 229672 164181 1,102.00 331357 21412010 102146 JESSEN PRESS 750.93 CONTRACTOR ENVELOPES 229507 20396 750.93 331358 2/4/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 60.55 229735 1357626 3,298.55 229736 1357627 3,359.10 331360 214/2010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 112.00 229426 1770869 163.45 229427 1747245 40.36 - 229428 447382 20.00 - 229429 446521 28.98- 229430 446961 4.13 - 229431 446959 4.83- 229432 446960 5.33- 229433 446520 59.22- 229434 447473 37.12 - 229435 447086 3,131.27 229537 1774065 .28 229538 1774047 1.12 229539 1774049 62.21 229540 1774051 1,363.97 229541 1774062 414.48 229542 1774059 1,117.37 229543 1774061 59.02 229544 1774050 715.87 229545 1774060 785.30 229546 1774048 2.24 229547 1774052 1,815.85 229548 1774064 36.11 229737 1774057 1419.6102 1470.6406 1495.6575 5842.5515 5842.5514 5862.5513 5822.5512 5862.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5515 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page - 12 Business Unit RESERVE PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 2,064.80 4,744.30 1.12 .28 113.36 1,873.24 73.12 5,020.16 514.63 372.42 568.02 331361 214/2010 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE Council Check 272.00 INSTRUCTOR AC Page - 13 272.00 -2/4/2010 331362 2/4/2010 PO # Doc No 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD W. Account No Subledger Account Description 160.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 1774054 5842.5512 160.00 YORK SELLING 331363 214/2010 5842.5512 102603 JONAS, LENORE YORK SELLING 229740 461.25 INSTRUCTOR AC COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 461.25 1774042 331364 2/4/2010 YORK SELLING 102080 KATTREH, ANN 1774046 5842.5513 111.95 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229743 1774055 111.95 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 331365 2/412010 1774045 111018 KEEPRS INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199.99 UNIFORMS 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 65.98 UNIFORMS 1774041 5822.5512 147.96 UNIFORMS 229747 1774040 413.93 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 331366 2/4/2010 1774039 125200 KENDALL, BOHN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 32.50 ART WORK SOLD 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 32.50 229750 331367 214/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN CITY OF EDINA 2/312010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 13 2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 229738 1774054 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229739 1774058 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229740 1774044 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 229741 1774042 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229742 1774046 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229743 1774055 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229744 1774045 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229745 1774056 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229746 1774041 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 229747 1774040 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 229748 1774039 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 229749 1774038 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 229750 1774037 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 229699 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 229700 012810 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 229673 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 229629 013010 5621.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 30003635 229674 130602 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL )0003617 229675 129247 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL )0003613 229676 129432 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 229677 012209 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3 /2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 14 2/4/2010 - 214/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 102.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229717 020110 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 102.40 331368 2/4/2010 100198 KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. 27.67 PICTURE FRAME FOR MAP 229688 020110 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 111.79 CELL PHONE CHARGES 228688 020110 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 23.25 CELL PHONE CHARGES 229718 2/1/10 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 42.90 MEASURING WHEEL 229718 2/1/10 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 205.61 331369 21412010 124707 KNAEBLE, PETER 158.75 BOOKS FOR EMT COURSE 229719 012910 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 158.75 331370 2/4/2010 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 187.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229508 012210 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 187.55 331371 2/4/2010 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 480.00 JR GOLF INSTRUCTION 229659 012910 5210.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF DOME PROGRAM 480.00 331372 2/4/2010 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 677.60 INSTRUCTOR AC 229701 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 677.60 331373 2/4/2010 101502 KONTERS, VIK 211.63 UNIFORM PURCHASE 229630 012810 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 211.63 331374 2/4/2010 125194 KOSSE, JEFFREY 100.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 229579 012510 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 100.00 331375 21412010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 277.77 DRILL BITS, LOCK NUTS 00001469 229366 8840899 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 416.91 DRILL BITS, NUTS, BOLTS 00001469 229367 8840898 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.75 WASHERS 00001469 229631 8854233 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 382.89 CLIPS, SCREWS 00001498 229632 8850478 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 224.68 SCREWS, WASHERS, COUPLINGS 00001498 229633 8850479 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 138.76 TY -RAP 00001497 229634 8850480 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 1,476.76 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 15 2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 331376 21412010 125207 LIGHTHOUSE MGMT CO 36.85 UTILITY REFUND -5829 WOODDALE 229720 012910 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 36.85 331377 214/2010 126208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 45.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229762 012810 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 45.60 331378 21412010 101792 LUBE -TECH 7,361.25 FUEL 00001546 229368 1730679 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7,361.25 331379 21412010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 1,884.20 EQUIPMENT PARTS 00001307 229635 2101138 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,884.20 331380 21412010 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 325.73 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 229766 020110 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 325.73 331381 214/2010 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 225.00 HOSTING FEE 229369 141 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 225.00 331382 21412010 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 135.00 PHONE CHANGES 229722 53199 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 480.94 PHONE CHANGES 229723 53433 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 615.94 331383 21412010 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 216.67 5203192164 -0000 229509 607479660 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 216.67 331384 214/2010 116359 MCMAHON, DANIEL 49.90 UNIFORM PURCHASE 229721 012910 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 49.90 331385 214/2010 101483 MENARDS 18.68 UNIONS 00005896 229370 18374 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.32 DEBURRING TOOL, WRENCH 00001474 229371 19185 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 200.55 BULBS, ROLLERS 00006171 229372 19148 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 11.78 WOOD FILLER 00001485 229373 20086 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21312010 7:49:56 Page - 16 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 261.33 331386 2/4/2010 100885 METRO SALES INC 79.40 TONER 00008062 229510 96309A 5510.6513 392.60 COPIER MAINT/USAGE 00006395 229678 352433 5410.6230 472.00 331387 2/412010 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 55.00 OFFICIATING FEES 229374 3682 4077.6103 55.00 331388 2/4/2010 122304 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 5,017.07 DIAL -A -RIDE DEC 2009 229769 0000919451 1514.6103 5,017.07 331389 2/4/2010 104650 MICRO CENTER 230.78 IT SUPPLIES 00004301 229724 2587651 1554.6406 230.78 331390 2/412010 125177 MID- COUNTY FABRICATING INC. 748.13 SNOW BLOWER SHAFT 00001297 229375 14792 1553.6530 748.13 331391 214/2010 124371 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 400.00 NEGOTIATOR CONFERENCE 229636 012910 1400.6104 400.00 331392 214/2010 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 153.47 BADGE - SIITARI 229511 106239 1400.6203 153.47 331393 214/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 39.86 HOSE PART 00006164 229376 00826664N 5422.6406 39.86 331394 21412010 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 60.92 BUSINESS CARDS 00003660 229637 5558 1470.6406 60.92 331395 21412010 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT 500.00 HOSTING FEE 229377 128078 2210.6103 21312010 7:49:56 Page - 16 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3 /2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 17 214/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 500.00 331396 2/412010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 151.27 FILTERS 00006166 229378 710338 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 79.88 BEDKNIFE SCREWS 00006172 229379 710797 -00 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 231.15 331397 2/412010 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 2,375.80 PLASTICWARE 229639 51019 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,375.80 331398 2/4/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 475.50 229436 58245 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 475.50 331399 21412010 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 22.50 VERBAL JUDO MATERITALS 229640 2005 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 22.50 331400 21412010 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 229335 020410 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 331401 2/412010 125089 NOKOMIS SHOES MOBILE STORE 149.95 SAFETY BOOTS 00001408 229380 495 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 149.95 331402 21412010 105205 NORTH CENTRAL EMS COOPERATIVE 75.00 DUES 229638 012710 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 331403 2/4/2010 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 174.65 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 205.40 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 398.25 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 521.20 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 607.45 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,648.15 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,363.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 3,722.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 '229512 NIA4355 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,320.65 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005413 229512 NIA4355 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 300.00 FREIGHT & HANDLING 00004150 229513 NIA4355A 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 18 2/4/2010 -214/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation Poi Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14,261.25 331404 21412010 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 470.10 LIGHTS 00001302 229381 23169 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 254.36 LIGHTS 00001302 229641 23203 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 724.46 331405 214/2010 125184 NORTHSTAR MEDIA SERVICES LLC 102.49 QUICKTIME FILES 229514 5533 1400.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102.49 331406 21412010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 346.92 WATER COLORS, CHARCOAL 00009140 229725 38398300 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 346.92 331407 2/4/2010 116114 OCE 139.16 OCE MAINTENANCE - JAN 2010 229517 987037978 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 139.16 331408 2/412010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 12.75 DISPLAY CUBES 00006034 229382 1174807823 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 32.00 HOLDERS 00006034 229383 1174518859 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 17.66 BINDERS 00002387 229515 504959532001 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 47.01 FILES, STAPLES 00002387 229516 504959393001 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 570.29 TONER 229642 504709476001 5621.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 166.28 IMAGING DRUM 229643 504709173001 5621.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 845.99 331409 214/2010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 32.54 HOLE SAWS 00001526 229518 579299 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.54 331410 2/4/2010 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 150.00 WINDOW TINTING 229644 200150 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 331411 2/412010 124697 PARKER, CHELSEA 436.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 229702 012810 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 436.00 331412 214/2010 102440 PASS, GRACE 320.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 229703 012810 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229703 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 7411.6103 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5862.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 1120.6406 45008.6710 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page - 19 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 662.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 331413 2/412010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100347 PAUS71S & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,955.63 50TH ST SELLING 229437 8248843 -IN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,537.97 YORK SELLING 229438 8248851 -IN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,595.32 50TH ST SELLING 229439 8248860 -IN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,088.92 YORK SELLING 331414 214/2010 125154 PAYNE, JEFFREY 300.00 REPLACE LIGHTING 229645 30 300.00 331415 21412010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,088.61 229549 2865394 2,011.81 229550 2865392 12.14 229551 3429805 7.17- 229552 3430232 12.14 229553 3429804 12.56- 229554 3429893 4.00- 229555 3430261 8.92- 229556 3430260 4.38- 229557 3429896 3.76- 229558 3429894 4.02 - 229559 3429895 575.14 229751 2865388 833.81 229752 2865386 305.89 229753 2865387 3,112.16 229754 2865398 811.51 229755 2865391 1,999.44 229756 2865390 10,669.28 331416 2/4/2010 121387 POSTNET 27.88 NOTARY STAMP 229519 012710 27.88 331417 2/4/2010 108681 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY 1,260.82 MOTION SENSORS 229646 25012 1,260.82 331418 2/412010 100380 PRESTRUD, ROBERT 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 7411.6103 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5862.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 1120.6406 45008.6710 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page - 19 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 139.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 479.82 UNIFORM PURCHASE 619.81 YORK SELLING 331419 2/4/2010 104424 PRIEDE, SOREN 121.93 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 364.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 485.93 952 920 - 8166 331420 2/4/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 104.19 50TH ST SELLING 2,569.53 952 922 - 9246 228.80 9246 -1/10 110.00 YORK SELLING 883.35 50TH ST SELLING 801.60 1,616.14 21412010 103.20 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 601.60 1,236.96 2,276.68 ROLLERS, BEARINGS 00006170 89.60 - CD1290982 19.98- 181.60 10,604.07 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 - 2/4/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 229726 020110 1646.6610 229726 020110 1646.6201 229704 012810 229704 012810 229440 258913 -00 229441 261685 -00 229442 261027 -00 229443 261028 -00 229444 261778 -00 229445 261754 -00 229446 261779 -00 229447 261780 -00 229448 261029 -00 229449 261687 -00 229450 261686 -00 229451 257282 -00 229452 258697 -00 229570 261755 -00 331421 2/4/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 123898 QWEST COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 53.50 952 922 - 2444 229384 2444 -1/10 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.95 952 920 - 8166 229385 8166 -1/10 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 40.58 952 922 - 9246 229647 9246 -1/10 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 208.03 50TH ST SELLING 331422 21412010 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 1,309.60 ROLLERS, BEARINGS 00006170 229386 CD1290982 1,309.60 331423 21412010 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 229520 012710 500.00 331424 2/4/2010 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 137.50 REPAIRS AT ARNESON 00001091 229387 11774 5111.6406 5110.6103 5822.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5514 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5513 1550.6188 1550.6188 1400.6188 5422.6530 1000.2055 1646.6180 Subledger Account Description SAFETY EQUIPMENT LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/312010 7:49:56 Page - 20 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTEN' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 — 2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 137.50 331425 214/2010 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 191.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 229388 012610 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 191.00 331426 21412010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 741.71 SOFTENER SALT 00008057 229521 00230048 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 741.71 331427 21412010 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 321.00 DUES - JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 229582 2144 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 321.00 331428 214/2010 105534 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINAIMORNINGSI 212.00 DUES - HEATHER WORTHINGTON 229389 1691 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 212.00 331429 21412010 100987 SA -AG INC 806.57 ICE CONTROL SAND 00005441 229390 65111 1318.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 806.57 331430 21412010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 53.54 101 --- *9350 229727 012910 1600.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 53.54 331431 21412010 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 2,304.09 AIR FILTERS 229583 112664 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,304.09 331432 21412010 125199 SCHADEGG, ANTHONY 120.00 KILN ROOM WORK 229705 011110 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 120.00 331433 214/2010 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 110.62 LENS 00001301 229648 1040821 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 110.62 331434 2/4/2010 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 546.40 INSTRUCTOR AC 229706 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 546.40 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page - 21 Business Unit UTILITY REVENUES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 22 2/4/2010 - 214/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 331435 21412010 124036 SCHOENECKER, PAUL 50.42 REFUND -5945 ASHCROFT AVE 229576 UTILITY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 50.42 331436 2/412010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 82.88 SUPPLIES 229707 012810 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 384.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229707 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 848.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 229707 012810 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 1,314.88 331437 21412010 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 1,696.10 SERVER MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229679 7F7CE 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,696.11 SERVER MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229679 7F7CE 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,696.11 SERVER MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229679 7177CE 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 552.08 MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229680 78992 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 552.08 MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229680 7B992 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 552.08 MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229680 78992 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 552.12 MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229680 7B992 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 3,864.56 MS LICENSE ADDITION 00004369 229680 7B992 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11,161.24 331438 214/2010 111824 SIDEKICK 299.03 SCANNING OF DRAWINGS 229391 3365 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 4,526.55 PLAN SCANNING 229681 3364 1495.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER INSPECTIONS 4,825.58 331439 214/2010 120784 SIGN PRO 159.75 SIGN FOR DOME 00006430 229584 3670 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 159.75 331440 21412010 126137 SJOBLOM, JOHN 46.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229728 012910 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 46.00 331441 21412010 118684 SMITH, KEVIN 157.08 REFUND - 5017 SCHAEFER RD 229580 UTILITY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 157.08 331442 2/412010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 4,194.75 1ST QTR OPERATING FEES 229585 8309 1470.6221 RANGE RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL •5,485.25 1ST QTR OPERATING FEES 229585 8309 1400.6221 RANGE RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9,680.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation 331443 21412010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 103.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 263.00 CLEANING /MAINTENANCE 366.50 CITY OF EDINA 2/312010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 23 2/412010 -2/4/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 229708 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 229708 012810 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 331444 214/2010 TELEPHONE 101003 SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 992.29 POST CARDS 00006432 229649 7101 TELEPHONE 992.29 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 331445 2/4/2010 TELEPHONE 104672 SPRINT 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 12.95 TELEPHONE 229392 873184124 -086 TELEPHONE 19.80 1322.6188 229392 873184124 -086 2210.6188 43.66 COMMUNICATIONS 229392 873184124 -086 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.13 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 229392 873184124 -086 TELEPHONE 51.13 1495.6188 229392 873184124 -086 1301.6188 51.34 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 229392 873184124 -086 ENGINEERING GENERAL 52.79 TELEPHONE 229392 873184124 -086 TELEPHONE 65.19 5910.6188 229392 873184124 -086 1400.6188 78.07 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 229392 873184124 -086 115.81 229392 873184124 -086 115.88 229392 873184124 -086 141.71 229392 873184124 -086 154.25 229392 873184124 -086 219.10 229392 873184124 -086 235.32 229392 873184124 -086 241.50 229392 873184124 -086 297.18 229392 873184124 -086 410.70 229392 873184124 -086 534.06 229392 873184124 -086 607.54 229392 873184124 -086 1,870.70 229392 873184124 -086 5,369.81 331446 21412010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 107.83 MIRROR, CLAMP 00001530 229650 S176535 107.83 331447 214/2010 103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 2114/10 229651 012810 75.00 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 —2/412010 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 331448 214/2010 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 357.55 PLOW REPAIR PARTS 00001095 229522 14792 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS 357.55 331449 2/4/2010 124631 STUART C. IRBY CO. 29.33 GLOVE TESTING 00001557 229652 S005114962.001 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 29.33 331450 214/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 4,757.35 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00001150 229393 567577 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 28.94 CAP HUB 00001525 229653 219919 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,786.29 331451 21412010 105441 SUSA 300.00 MEMBERSHIP (3) 229729 020109 5913.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 300.00 331462 2/412010 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 229334 020410 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 331453 2/4/2010 101027 TARGET 54.41 SUPPLIES 00006394 229394 011810 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 54.41 331454 2/4/2010 125201 TEMP -AIR 11,191.34 TEMPORARY HEAT FOR PW BLDG 00005891 229682 R10188765 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 429.10- CREDIT 00005891 229683 RC00324 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10,762.24 331455 21412010 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 144.09 FUSES, CONNECTORS 00001349 229395 30257 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 56.61 EXTRACTION TOOLS 00001295 229396 31081 -00 1553.6556 TOOLS 200.70 331456 21412010 121253 THAYER, LARRY 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Page - 24 Business Unit PATHS & HARD SURFACE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION RESERVE PROGRAM CLUB HOUSE PW BUILDING PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229523 107494 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 142.25 331457 21412010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 4,286.30 229757 576962 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 307.00- 229758 74972 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/4/2010 -214/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,979.30 331458 21412010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 499.63 PROPANE GAS, CYLINDER 00001424 229524 294296 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 437.05- CREDIT 00001424 229525 294297 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,090.13 CYLINDERS 00001519 229526 294299 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 1,496.25 CYLINDERS 00001300 229527 294300 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 1,838.25 ACETYLENE, CYLINDERS 00001148 229528 294298 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 4,487.21 331459 214/2010 100682 TRUGREEN LAWNCARE 353.51 ICE MELT 00001088 229529 762012 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 353.51 331460 21412010 123582 TSCHOSICK, RON 71.01 KITCHEN FAUCET 229397 012610 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.01 331461 2/4/2010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 583.28 TIRES, RIMS 00006169 229398 0119792 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 583.28 331462 2/4/2010 115379 U.S. BANK 48.23 SUNDBERG CO 229684 JAN052010 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 77.77 MITO CORP, HONDA TOWN 229684 JAN052010 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 189.25 SEARS 229684 JAN052010 5913.6556 TOOLS 246.67 OFFICE MAX 229684 JAN052010 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 561.92 331463 2/4/2010 119476 USPCA REGION 12 60.00 DOG CERTIFICATION 229654 012810 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 60.00 331464 2/4/2010 119476 USPCA REGION 12 40.00 2010 MEMBERSHIP 229655 013010 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 40.00 331465 214/2010 100050 USPS - HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 229586 012810 1550.6235 POSTAGE 4,000.00 331466 2/4/2010 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 2/312010 7:49:56 Page - 25 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PATHS & HARD SURFACE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 26 2/4/2010 — 2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,944.27 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001271 229685 15126 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3.944.27 331467 21412010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 155.91 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 229530 146786 -01 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 232.22 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 229531 148618 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 388.13 331468 214/2010 125195 VERBAL JUDO INSTITUTE INC. 8,467.72 SEMINAR INSTRUCTION 00007426 229656 765 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 8,467.72 331469 21412010 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.44 229687 2342731184 5952.6188 TELEPHONE RECYCLING 38.33 229687 2342731184 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 95.98 229687 2342731184 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 109.89 229687 2342731184 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 282.93 229687 2342731184 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 559.57 331470 21412010 119454 VINOCOPIA 1,013.75 229453 0022481 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,013.75 331471 214/2010 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,064.28 FOOD 00002001 229686 27058663 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,064.28 331472 214/2010 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 229333 020410 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 331473 214/2010 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 1,500.00 LEAK DETECTIONS 00001270 229399 1669 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,500.00 331474 214/2010 104681 WEBB, DONNA 56.00 SUPPLIES 229709 012810 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 488.25 INSTRUCTOR AC 229709 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 544.25 331475 21412010 116516 WELDON, KEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 27 2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 98.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 229710 012810 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 98.00 331476 21412010 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 566.06 FES MAINTENANCE 229400 020110 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 566.06 331477 21412010 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 65.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229657 012910 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 65.50 331478 214/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 401.90 229454 235487 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 771.20 229560 235613 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 242.30 229561 235486.00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,415.40 331479 21412010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 4,150.82 229562 305061 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 129.12 229563 299269 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.50- 229564 46228 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.33- 229565 46229 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.33- 229566 46225 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.00- 229567 46223 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 40.00- 229568 46227 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.67- 229569 46224 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 878.56 229759 305058 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 218.99 229760 305059 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,294.66 331481 214/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 14,248.00 229455 351312 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.15 229456 352454 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 152.74 229457 352547 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,874.25 229458 352545 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,722.40 229459 352544 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,012.19 229460 352536 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 73.10 229461 352537 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,781.46 229462 352534 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37.05 229463 352535 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1.15 229464 352453 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 980.10 229465 352542 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 213 /2010 7:49:56 Council Check Register Page - 28 2/4/2010 -2/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 556.75 229466 352541 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,011.95 229467 352538 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9.75 229468 352539 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.15 229469 352452 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 98.10 - 229470 794044 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 15.73- 229471 794463 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 35.17- 229472 793400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.57- 229473 793408 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10.41- 229474 794465 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,377.00 229571 352546 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 850.05 229572 352543 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 38,436.26 331482 2/412010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,020.15 229475 564266 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,020.15 331483 2/4/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 913.75 229476 242434 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,801.45 229477 242433 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 555.80 229478 242436 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,271.00 331484 21412010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 63.27 51- 4420190 -3 229401 225364641 1321.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8,742.94 51- 6644819 -9 229730 225733173 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 8,806.21 331485 21412010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 14,212.80 FUEL 00001010 229402 968737 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8,579.66 FUEL 00001010 229403 967744 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22,792.46 331486 21412010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 1,557.50 229761 9247 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,557.50 331487 21412010 122316 ZACWS INC. 276.41 SHOVELS 00001499 229532 25569 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 276.41 331488 210 -40 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 167.16 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 164.42 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 331.58 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 214/2010 —2/4/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 229405 54165722 1551.6406 00008066 229533 54065540 5510.6610 331489 21412010 101091 71EGLER INC 155.16 GROMMETS, CLIPS, SPACERS 00001520 229534 PC001185673 1553.6530 209.33 TUBES, O -RINGS 00001520 229535 PC001185674 1553,6530 98.99 FILTERS 00001522 229658 PC001185461 1553.6530 463.48 331490 21412010 102500 21111IMERMAN, TIM 129.99 2010 SAFETY BOOTS 129.99 711,381.03 Grand Total 229404 012610 1646.6610 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 711,381.03 Total Payments 711,381.03 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 213/2010 7:49:56 Page - 29 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2010 7:51:05 Council Check Summary Page - 1 i, 2/4/2010 - 2/4/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 475,838.29 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,542.25 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 21,715.43 05100 ART CENTER FUND 10,780.15 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 733.76 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 11,726.99 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 2,963,12 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 20,253.44 05800 LIQUOR FUND 135,668.87 05900 UTILITY FUND 14,585.87 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.44 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 14,540.42 Report Totals 711,381.03 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of.Edina purchasing poll ie and procedurese,t___� L4 'On City witmager R55CKREG LOG20000 1,196.30 CITY OF EDINA 331496 2111/2010 Council Check Register 2111/2010 - 2/11/2010 228841 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 331491 211112010 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 296.00 25.15 331497 229873 0805054 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 45.20 229958 0723375 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 020410 5101.4413 70.35 40.30 331492 2111/2010 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 211112010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 582.50 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 229822 7160 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 956372 5210.5510 80.00 BATTERY REPAIRS 00001665 230077 7128 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 662.50 331499 211112010 119646 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 331493 2/1112010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 49.08 ART WORK SOLD 230228 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 49.08 331494 2/11/2010 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 43.01 229909 013110 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 59.50 229909 013110 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 93.49 229909 013110 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 132.38 229909 013110 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 206.52 229909 013110 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 227.65 229909 013110 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 310.14 229909 013110 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 1,072.69 331495 211112010 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page- 1 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GRILL YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,196.30 DISPATCH SERVICE 230078 13327 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,196.30 331496 2111/2010 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 152.00 GIFT SHOP HELP 228841 011510 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 144.00 GIFT SHOP HELPER 228845 011510 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 296.00 331497 211112010 123555 ANDERSON, SANDRA 40.30 ART WORK SOLD 230230 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 40.30 331498 211112010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 76.55 COFFEE 229928 956372 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 76.55 331499 211112010 119646 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2010 15:38:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 2 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300.00 WEB HOSTING 00006324 230079 17150 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 331500 2/1112010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 26.30 229823 020110 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 32.88 229823 020110 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 33.00 229823 020110 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 229823 020110 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 229823 020110 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 66.03 229823 020110 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 73.77 229823 020110 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 81.29 229823 020110 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.66 229823 020110 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 84.35 229823 020110 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 201.32 229823 020110 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 232.79 229823 020110 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 264.90 229823 020110 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 264.91 229823 020110 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 431.01 229823 020110 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 592.03 229823 020110 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 190.76 230080 1- 146354 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 2.736.99 331501 211112010 100256 AT&T MOBILITY 78.15 230081 870517029X20210 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 78.15 331502 211112010 106015 ATHLETICA INC. 239.83 HOCKEY GOAL PADS 00008070 229824 0017769 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 239.83 331503 211112010 100637 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. 65.79 FRONT ALIGNMENT 00001666 230082 56476 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.79 FRONT ALIGNMENT 00001667 230083 56469 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 131.58 331504 211112010 112862 AXELSON, MARY 15.60 ART WORK SOLD 230229 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 331505 211112010 121083 BARR, FRANK 42.25 ART WORK SOLD 230231 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVF " - -S R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 42.25 331506 2111/2010 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 26.13 BATTERY 00001569 229910 18- 263151 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 3 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 26.13 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 331607 2111/2010 50TH ST SELLING 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,939.06 ICE EDGER 00008063 229825 00077756 5521.6406 369.96 HOCKEY NETS 00008063 229929 00077792 5521.6406 3,309.02 331508 2111/2010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 744.95 229874 52002100 5862.5512 1,950.84 229875 51998500 5842.5513 1,433.43 229876 51998300 5862.5513 484.34 229877 51998400 5822.5513 430.10 229878 52001900 5822.5512 917.75 229879 52002000 5842.5512 103.19 229880 83253800 5842.5515 6,064.60 331509 2111/2010 105864 BEN MEADOWS COMPANY 126.26 SALT SPREADER 00002199 230084 1014858860 5620.6406 126.26 331510 211112010 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 800.84 SNOW REMOVAL 230085 135046 7411.6136 800.84 331511 211112010 115067 BENSON, RON PAUL 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 230232 020410 5101.4413 39.00 331512 211112010 125227 BERGUM, MOLLY 35.75 ART WORK SOLD 230233 020410 5101.4413 35.75 331613 211112010 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN 25.35 ART WORK SOLD 230234 020410 5101.4413 25.35 331514 211112010 125225 BOMA GREATER MINNEAPOLIS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 3 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/9 /2010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 4 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 2124/10 SEMINAR 230198 020510 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 150.00 331515 211112010 117411 BONK, RICHARD 34.45 ART WORK SOLD 230235 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 34.45 331516 211112010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 201.13 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003663 230086 87123226 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,083.16 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003664 230087 87123962 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,284.29 331517 211112010 102813 BOWMAN, ROBERT 45.50 ART WORK SOLD 230236 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.50 331518 211112010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 865.12 SPRING, KIT, BOLTS 00001535 229827 371265 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.04- CREDIT 00001304 229946 370043 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.90 MOTOR, RESISTOR 00001627 230088 372737 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.14 BRACKET 00005919 230262 355215 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 988.12 331519 2111/2010 103279 BRETSON, GREG 99.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 229826 020210 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.00 331520 2/1112010 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 365.16 SLIDING DOOR REPAIR 230089 512534S 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 365.16 331521 2/11/2010 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREE N 42.25 ART WORK SOLD 230237 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.25 331522 211112010 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 36.40 ART WORK SOLD 230238 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 36.40 331523 211112010 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 618.88 FEB NEWSLETTER 229930 20369 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 618.88 CITY OF EDINA 219 /2010 15:38:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 2111/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 331524 211112010 105315 CALTON, BOB 15.60 ART WORK SOLD 230239 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 331525 211112010 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 7,492.65 LEGAL 230090 2851G -1 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 7,404.37 LEGAL 230263 2851G- 1/31/10 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 14,897.02 331526 2/11/2010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 15.50 229881 18776 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 394.10 229882 18777 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,664.10 229883 18782 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,458.50 229959 18876 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 442.00 229960 18923 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 481.90 229961 18873 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 13,456.10 331527 211112010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 85.00 229962 85083 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 85.00 331528 211112010 100681 CATCO 126.79 SPRING, CONNECTOR 00001626 230091 3 -85585 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.79 331529 211112010 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 7.11 8033998 -9 229931 8033998 -1110 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 7.11 331530 2/1112010 120613 CHATTERTON, LINDA 35.72 ART WORK SOLD 230240 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.72 331531 2/1112010 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 277.15 229963 410169 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 332.95 229964 410676 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 610.10 331532 211112010 125219 CITY OF FARMINGTON 3,000.00 3 METER READING DEVICES 229932 020310 5916.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER READING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 219 /2010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 6 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,000.00 331533 2/1112010 105529 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 175.00 MNJAC CONFERENCE FEE 229828 020210 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 175.00 331534 211112010 105316 CLARK, PENNY 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 230241 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.25 331535 2/1112010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 598.50 229884 0118231832 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 598.50 331536 211112010 101345 COLOURS 1,038.75 ABOUT TOWN ENVELOPES 229933 10158 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 1,038.75 331537 2111/2010 120433 COMCAST 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 229934 199138 -1/10 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 229935 177449 - 1/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 82.59 8772 10 614 0164959 230092 164959 - 1/10 6430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 229.85 331538 2111/2010 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 20.41 SAFETY GLASSES 00001565 230093 03607070 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.84 SAFETY GLASSES 00001565 230093 03607070 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 47.66 SAFETY GLASSES 00001565 230093 03607070 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.57 SAFETY GLASSES 00001565 230093 03607070 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.70 SAFETY GLASSES 00001565 230093 03607070 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 329.18 331539 211112010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 18,530.00 REPLACE MICROPROCESSORS 00004186 229829 69743 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 18,530.00 331540 2111/2010 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 262.68 12 BUCKET GOLF CARD 00006436 230094 00052466 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 262.68 331541 211112010 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 380.68 SOLENOID, FUEL PUMP 00001299 229830 805 -11528 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page- 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING Council Check Register 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 621.92 EMERGENCY GENERATOR SERVICE 230095 100 -45174 5620.6230 1,002.60 331542 211112010 121655 CURA, SARA 40.95 ART WORK SOLD 230242 020410 5101.4413 40.95 331543 2/11/2010 105905 CURRENT ORDER PROCESSING CENTE 49.95 OFFICE RETURN LABELS 229936 020110 1628.6406 49.95 331544 2/1112010 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 659.00 DRAIN MAINTENANCE 230096 73581 1470.6215 659.00 331545 211112010 104020 DALCO 288.35 SANITIZER, CLEANERS 00008051 229831 2176660 5511.6511 994.04 TISSUES, LINERS, CLEANER 00008061 229832 2176680 5511.6511 1,972.70 ICE FIGHTER 00001483 229833 2174244 4090.6406 263.85 GLASS CLEANER, PUNCH 00001547 229834 2177259 1553.6406 330.03 TOWELS, LINERS 00001551 229947 2178415 1552.6406 365.45 CLEANERS 00001097 230097 2177335 1646.6406 4,214.42 331546 211112010 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 108.55 ART WORK SOLD 230243 020410 5101.4413 108.55 331547 2/1112010 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 686.00 229965 2011004 5862.5514 686.00 331548 211112010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,755.69 229885 537772 5822.5514 1,855.00 229886 537775 5842.5514 3,022.30 229887 537770 5862.5514 375.00 229888 537771 5862.5514 1,466.80 229966 538664 5862.5514 2,131.45 229967 538666 5842.5514 184.50 229968 538683 5822.5512 955.70 229969 538665 5822.5514 600.00 229970 110509 5842.5514 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page- 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 219 /2010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 8 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 12,346.44 331549 2/11/2010 124357 DELANEY, ALICE 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 230244 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 331550 2/1112010 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 3,364.48 JAN 2010 SURCHARGE 229937 8323053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 3,364.48 331551 2/1112010 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 47.00 DNR PERMIT FEE 00001098 230197 020501 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 47.00 331552 2/11/2010 102831 DEX EAST 575.00 230098 110311893 -1/10 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 21.20 230099 . 110312148 -1/10 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.20 230099 110312148 -1/10 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 21.20 230099 110312148 -1/10 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 638.60 331553 21/112010 108648 DOAN, SURI 41.60 ART WORK SOLD 230245 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 41.60 331554 2/1112010 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 716.66 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 230100 25299 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 716.67 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 230100 25299 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 716.67 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 230100 25299 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,150.00 331555 211112010 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 230246 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 331556 211112010 116357 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC. 363.15 MCQUAY ENGINEERING 230264 201002815 5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 363.15 331557 2/1112010 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 105.43 LAMPS 00001494 229835 06954200 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 59.43 CONDUIT, COUPLINGS 00001473 229836 06953300 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STAT "11 MAINT R65CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/11/2010 - 2111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5511.6136 5822.6122 5842.6122 5862.6122 5210.6122 219/2010 15:38:34 Page- 9 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1646.6103 164.86 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE 331558 2/11/2010 5841.6250 101667 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL YORK OCCUPANCY 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 9,983.00 EHS BOYS CLASSIC % 227373 122209 5861.6250 9,983.00 VERNON OCCUPANCY 331559 2/1112010 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 198.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 230101 AW -10 -08 198.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 230101 AW 10-08 198.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 230101 AV1L10 -08 375.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 230102 AW10 -10 970.00 331560 211112010 103594 EDINALARM INC. 168.00 ALARM MONITORING 00001102 230103 58340 262.91 MONITORING SERVICE 230104 58267 557.89 MONITORING SERVICE 230104 58267 243.68 MONITORING SERVICE 230105 58268 269.33 MONITORING SERVICE 230106 58266 288.56 MONITORING SERVICE 230106 58266 1,790.37 331561 211112010 100049 EHLERS $ ASSOCIATES INC 500.00 POST - ISSUANCE POLICY 230107 60359 500.00 331562 2/11/2010 123791 ERICKSON, MINDY 143.00 ART WORK SOLD 230247 020410 143.00 331563 211112010 125217 ESTATE OF JIMIRENEE FESENMAIER 117.57 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 229837 020110 117.57 331564 2/1112010 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,201.50 JANUARY TRANSPORTS BILLED 230108 020410 5,201.50 331565 2/1112010 119971 FELSEN, GREGG 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 230248 020410 19.50 5511.6136 5822.6122 5842.6122 5862.6122 5210.6122 219/2010 15:38:34 Page- 9 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 229971 116226 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 635.25 229972 116225 Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING 369.00 229973 116227 5842.5513 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 2.540.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 331566 211112010 106115 FISHMAN, SANDRA 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 230118 020510 5822.6406 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 230249 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.00 331567 211112010 104205 FUCKER, KEVIN 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 230250 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 29.25 331568 211112010 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 513.53 K9 EXAM 230109 358365 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 513.53 331569 211112010 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 28.99 R -91 PHONE 230110 1959245 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 28.99 331570 211112010 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 365.35 JAN 2010 SERVICE 00001591 230111 0010469 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 365.35 331571 211112010 120929 GOVCONNECTION INC. 232.62 DIGITAL CAMERA 00004303 230112 46097605 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 232.62 331572 211112010 101103 GRAINGER 163.91 BATTERIES, WHISK BROOMS 00001555 229838 9170329305 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.99 SOCKETS 00006177 230113 9170329297 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.22 SPOTLIGHT LAMP 230114 9167522748 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 162.21 LIGHTING 230115 9168576800 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 324.40 LIGHTING 230116 9167522730 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.17 LIGHTING 230117 9167043471 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 832.90 331573 2/1112010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,535.75 229971 116226 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 635.25 229972 116225 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 369.00 229973 116227 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.540.00 331574 211112010 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 230118 020510 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 230118 020510 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 269.41 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 211112010 100788 H &L MESABI 2/11/2010 — 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 230118 020510 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.70 STEPLADDER 230118 020510 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.05 SUPPLIES 230118 020510 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.66 SUPPLIES 230118 020510 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ART WORK SOLD 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page- 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUE FROM HRA DWI FORFEITURE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 269.41 331575 211112010 100788 H &L MESABI 1,193.58 PLOW BLADES 00001155 229911 79578 1553.6530 2,387.16 CUTTING EDGES 00001152 229912 79548 1553.6530 3,580.74 331576 211112010 118809 HALTARHUU, ERDENECHIMEG 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 230251 020410 5101.4413 19.50 331577 211112010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,814.50 CHEMICALS 00005451 230119 3090568 5915.6586 3,814.50 331578 2/1112010 100803 HENNEPIN COUNTY 493.00 CASE 09000116 DWI 230120 020410 2340.6103 493.00 331579 2111/2010 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 8,219.94 OVER SETTLEMENT TIF 1203 230121 012510 1000.1303 8,219,94 331580 211112010 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 95.00 SPRING 2010 SEMINAR 00001139 229913 00194973 1281.6104 95.00 331581 211112010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 101.54 SPEAKER BARS FOR LCDS 00004305 229938 47100462 1554.6406 2,116.13 LCD MONITORS 00004305 229939 47101397 1554.6406 2,217.67 331582 211112010 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 679.40 229889 511009 5862.5514 611.05 229974 511656 5842.5514 1,059.50 229975 511636 5862.5514 2,349.95 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ART WORK SOLD 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page- 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUE FROM HRA DWI FORFEITURE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2111/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 331583 2/11/2010 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 709.37 CHLORINE, ACID 00002202 230122 10012528 5620.6545 709.37 331584 211112010 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 163.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 230123 020310 1644.6107 163.50 331585 211112010 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 1,477.69 VFD BOARD REPLACEMENT 00001587 229839 3866 5912.6180 1,477.69 331586 2/1112010 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 101.53 TECH SUPPORT / CARD SYSTEM 00004309 230124 73600 2210.6103 101.53 331587 2111/2010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 70.45 FITTINGS, JOINT COMPOUND 00001549 229840 592544 5915.6406 70.45 331588 211112010 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 1,022.05 REPLACEMENT BALLASTS 00001366 229950 4255803 -01 1551.6406 1,022.05 331589 2/1112010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,723.54 229890 1357617 5822.5514 2,203.90 229891 1357625 5842.5514 307.30 229892 1357616 5862.5514 5,397.39 229893 1357615 5862.5514 20.00- 229894 966333 5862.5514 630.00 229976 973798 5862.5514 15.00 229977 1357656 5862.5515 2,076.60 229978 1357657 5862.5514 67.50 229979 1347505 5842.5512 8,339.17 229980 1357666 5842.5514 630.00 229981 973995 5842.5514 604.30 229982 1347492 5862.5512 21,974.70 331591 211112010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 34.42 229895 1774905 5842.5513 438.72 229896 1774908 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description CHEMICALS 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 12 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 27.58- 1,877.14 1,070.44 2,012.08 565.34 8,883.34 2.80 1,116.86 1,515.23 1,380.32 2,635.79 1,681.53 5,458.12 5.60 2.80 9,625.18 1,054.25 1.12 3,540.14 8.96- 2,060.41 44,925.09 331592 211112010 125220 JOHNSON, KRISTIN 375.00 6/19/10 RENTAL REFUND 375.00 331593 211112010 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 59.18 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 98.95 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 158.13 331594 211112010 123696 JOHNSTON, TOR] 16.90 ARTWORK SOLD 16.90 331595 211112010 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 4.49 RUBBER 14.96 THERMOSTAT 19.45 331596 211112010 123053 JUDSON, GARY 229953 020210 5601.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EB /CL REVENUES 230125 012610 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 230125 012610 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 230252 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 00001480 229841 044138 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00001490 229914 044290 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CITY OF EDINA 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 13 2/11/2010 - 2111/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 229897 447631 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 229983 1774043 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229984 1777816 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 229985 1777817 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 229986 1777822 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 229987 1777823 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 229988 1777809 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 229989 1777819 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 229990 1777820 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 229991 1777812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229992 1777811 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229993 1777810 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229994 1777813 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229995 1777807 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229996 1777806 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229997 1777815 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229998 1774053 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229999 1777808 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230000 1777814 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230001 447085 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230002 1774906 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 229953 020210 5601.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EB /CL REVENUES 230125 012610 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 230125 012610 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 230252 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 00001480 229841 044138 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00001490 229914 044290 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 219 /2010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 14 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 37.05 ART WORK SOLD 230253 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 37.05 331597 2/11/2010 120296 KAASA, GUNNAR 29.94 2010 UNIFORM PURCHASE 229948 020410 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.94 331598 211112010 120625 KAHN, CHRIS 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 230254 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 331599 211112010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 94.99 UNIFORMS 00003653 230126 133542 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 129.99 UNIFORMS 00003618 230127 133541 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 129.99 UNIFORMS 00003618 230128 133541 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 104.99 UNIFORMS 00003634 230129 133611 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 110.97 UNIFORMS 00003653 230130 133542 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.99 UNIFORMS 00003653 230131 133542 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 770.92 331600 211112010 124730 KEITH, BARBARA 12.34 ART WORK SOLD 230255 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.34 331601 211112010 105371 KLINE, GWEN 43.88 ART WORK SOLD 230256 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 43.88 331602 211112010 125228 KOEHLER, EMILY 28.60 ART WORK SOLD 230257 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 28.60 331603 211112010 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD 45.00 LICENSE FEE 230132 020410 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 45.00 331604 211112010 100845 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMENT INC. 51.30 WASHERS, UBOLTS 00001536 229949 988 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.30 331605 211112010 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 128.28 DWI TOW 230133 020410 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2111/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 15 Business Unit 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1553.6530 128.28 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 331606 211112010 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6406 198.79 BEDLINER 00002388 229915 206733 1553.6530 22.36 OIL FILTERS 00002388 229916 206732 128.73 PLOW MARKERS 00002391 229917 206937 349.88 331607 211112010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 147.50 TYGON FUEL TUBING 00001305 229918 8864758 331.14 TYGON FUEL TUBING 00001305 229919 8864757 399.08 HARDWARE 00003662 230134 8833098 337.84 HARDWARE 00003662 230135 8833099 98.22 HARDWARE 00003662 230136 8833100 424.48 HARDWARE 00003662 230137 8833097 31.55 SOCKET SCREWS, CONNECTORS 00001554 230138 8875312 413.86 CLAMPS, SCREWS, TEES 00001554 230139 8875311 2,183.67 331608 211112010 125135 LONGFELLOW- NOKOMIS MESSENGER 211.20 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 230140 54552 211.20 331609 211112010 125221 LORENZ, DARRIN 375.00 7/10/10 RENTAL REFUND 229954 020210 375.00 331610 211112010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 420.00 SWEEPER 8 VACTOR CLINICS 00001567 229842 020210 302.21 MUFFLER 00001567 230141 2101297 722.21 331611 211112010 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 1,500.00 DUTY EVALUATION 229843 6806 1,500.00 331612 211112010 100876 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 1,095.47 PLANTS 00002197 230142 47777 1,095.47 331613 211112010 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 49.90 2010 UNIFORM PURCHASE 229940 012910 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 15 Business Unit 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5601.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EB /CL REVENUES 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2111/2010 -- 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 16 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE WELL PUMPS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 49.90 331614 211112010 101483 MENARDS 63.77 NAIL GUN, STAPLES 00001559 229844 21016 1325.6406 122.82 BUILDING MATERIALS 00001096 229845 20822 1646.6406 70.84 CABLE, PLUMBING 00006384 230143 20071 5420.6406 257.43 331616 211112010 101987 MENARDS 6.94 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001090 229846 51836 1646.6406 6.94 331616 211112010 102281 MENARDS 18.98 WORK LIGHTS 00001592 230144 90986 5911.6556 18.96 331617 2/1112010 100885 METRO SALES INC 2,762.00 COPIER USAGE 230265 350840 1550.6230 2,762.00 331618 211112010 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 137.50 OFFICIATING FEES 229847 3690 4077.6103 137.50 331619 2111/2010 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 355,505.96 SEWER SERVICE 230145 0000920057 5922.6302 355,505.96 331620 211112010 101471 MGCSA 330.00 DUES (3) 230196 020510 5410.6105 330.00 331621 211112010 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 78.50 JAN MILEAGE 230146 020510 5621.6107 58.55 DEC MILEAGE 230266 FEB 5621.6107 137.05 331622 211112010 121053 MILLER, SUSAN 10.00 PETTY CASH 230147 FEB510 5621.6105 77.31 PETTY CASH 230147 FEB510 5620.6620 147.35 PETTY CASH 230147 FEB510 5620.6406 234.66 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 16 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE WELL PUMPS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK R65CKREG LOG20000 83 1 5842.5513 CITY OF EDINA 230004 2/9 /2010 15:38:34 5862.5513 736.00 Council Check Register 103831 NORTH CENTRAL AMBULANCE SALES Page - 17 77,461.37 AMBULANCE 00003841 230267 0013605 1470.6710 2/11/2010 — 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 331623 2/1112010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 118.99- CREDIT 230152 S01236055.001 19.95 CARBON DIOXIDE 00006428 230148 RI01100118 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 19.95 331624 211112010 108636 MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPERATORS 45.00 1 DAY TRAINING SEMINAR 229941 020310 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 45.00 331625 211112010 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 2118/10 230203 020510 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 331626 2/11/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 175.06 FILTER 00006172 230149 710797 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 175.06 331627 211112010 126229 NELSON, ALICE 58.50 ART WORK SOLD 230258 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 58.50 331628 2/11/2010 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 620.33 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 230150 52106 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 378.00 PLASTIC FORKS 230151 51020 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 998.33 331629 211112010 410 00 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 230003 5 5 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION 83 1 5842.5513 326.00 230004 58353 5862.5513 736.00 331630 2PI112010 103831 NORTH CENTRAL AMBULANCE SALES 77,461.37 AMBULANCE 00003841 230267 0013605 1470.6710 77,461.37 331631 2/1112010 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 942.64 GALVANIZED PIPE 00001151 229951 166282 1553.6530 942.64 331632 2111/2010 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 118.99- CREDIT 230152 S01236055.001 5913.6406 2,414.46 PIPE FITTINGS 00001178 230268 501234221.001 5913.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 2,295.47 331633 211112010 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 2/21/10 230204 020510 5621.6136 75.00 331634 211112010 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 PSAP MAINTENANCE 229848 80101639 1400.6230 557.72 331635 211112010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 188.40 PRINTING SERVICES 00003035 229849 505925885001 1400.6575 107.08 TONER 00002396 229956 505792044001 5631.6513 541.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 230153 1178077435 5621.6513 837.11 331636 211112010 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 2,374.50 SAFETY TIES, NETTING, RODS 230154 2012 5620.6530 738.20 WEB CRAWL FOR ADVENTURE PK - 230155 2013 5620.6530 3,112.70 331637 211112010 124996 OUTLAND BUILDERS INC. 19,625.34 #2 BILLING -YORK LOADING DOCK 00004179 230269 225 5800.1720 19,625.34 331638 2/11/2010 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 125.00 CAR CLEAN UP 00001664 230156 200108 1553.6180 195.00 WINDOW TINTING 230270 199595 1400.6215 320.00 331639 211112010 124855 PATRIOT ERECTORS INC. 1,230.00 YORK LOADING DOCK 00004180 230271 APPL 2 5800.1720 1,230.00 331640 211112010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 535.95 230005 8249554 -IN 5842.5513 671.80 230006 8249557 -IN 5822.5513 1,024.20 230007 8249559 -IN 5862.5513 2,012.55 230008 8249248 -IN 5862.5513 9.00- 230009 8249390 -CM 5822.5513 17.40- 230010 8249436 -CM 5862.5513 8.00- 230011 9249402 -CM 5842.5513 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/9 /2010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 19 2/11/2010 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 88.25- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 230012 8249087 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7411.6103 5421.5510 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 1400.6105 7411.6103 1553.6583 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD PSTF OCCUPANCY GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,121.85 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 331641 211112010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 125154 PAYNE,JEFFREY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 300.00 LAMP REPLACEMENT 230157 32 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 300.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 331642 211112010 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 284.18 229942 59238793 284.18 331643 211112010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,019.97 230013 2868209 355.53 230014 2868210 576.30 230015 2868211 294.16 230016 2868204 1,068.39 230017 2865389 74.24 230018 2868208 3,341.77 230019 2868206 82.12 230020 2865893 2,744.47 230021 2868205 822.62 230022 2868207 -293.60 230023 2868203 22.08- 230024 3419146 12.40- 230025 3419053 12,638.69 331644 2/1112010 124176 PINNACLE FIREWORKS 210.00 230026 10313 210.00 331645 211112010 101138 PLEAA 150.00 2010 DUES 230158 020410 150.00 331646 211112010 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 44.52 PEST CONTROL 230159 1519963 44.52 331647 2/1112010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 197.10 TIRES 00001381 229920 338850 197.10 7411.6103 5421.5510 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 1400.6105 7411.6103 1553.6583 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD PSTF OCCUPANCY GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TIRES & TUBES YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/11/2010 — 2111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 331648 2/1112010 100961 POSTMASTER-USPS 2,600.00 PERMIT #939 UTILITY BILLING 229850 020210 5910.6235 2,600.00 331649 211112010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 185.00 PI PERMIT #3932 229851 FEB0110 2210.61.23 185.00 331650 211112010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 1,122.00 STAMPS 229944 020410 5310.6235 1,122.00 331651 211112010 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,559.16 VEHICLE REPAIR 00001511 230160 20842 1553.6180 1,559.16 331652 211112010 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 252.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008071 229943 245777 5521.6215 252.00 331653 211112010 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH 2,385.00 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 229852 53588 2310.6230 2,385.00 331654 211112010 125224 PROVISIONS BOOK CO., THE 975.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 230200 125 5210.6122 975.00 331655 211112010 100971 QUALITY WINE 4,127.20 230027 264531 -00 5862.5513 1,193.21 230028 264530 -00 5862.5513 1,736.60 230029 264457 -00 5862.5512 808.00 230030 226032 -00 5862.5513 1,434.67 230031 264458 -00 5822.5512 2,784.80 230032 264542 -00 5822.5513 695.20 230033 263574 -00 5822.5513 2,672.03 230034 264456 -00 5842.5512 5,707.20 230035 264529-00 5842.5513 336.40 230036 263573 -00 5842.5513 5.64- 230037 261426 -00 5842.5513 49.33- 230038 260897 -00 5862.5513 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page - 20 Subledger Account Description Business Unit POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 21,440.34 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 331656 2/11/2010 123898 QWEST 55.66 952 929 -0297 78.74 952 929 -9549 277.08 952 927 -8861 55.87 703 58.57 78.74 83.87 83.87 331658 99.09 107.39 117.22 166.95 234.77 BEDKNIFE, BEARINGS 256.21 230161 266.44 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 229853 0297 -1/10 229854 954901/10 229855 8861 -1110 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146 -1/10 229856 0146-1/10 331657 211112010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 RAMP CLEANING - FEB 2010 00001570 229921 703 2,009.25 331658 2/1112010 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 880.00 BEDKNIFE, BEARINGS 00006175 230161 CD1294184 880.00 331659 211112010 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 2,682.56 MAIL WATER BILLS 230162 3388 2,682.56 331660 211112010 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 206.00 WINDSHIELD TINTING 00001144 230163 58170 151.72 INSTALL WINDSHIELD 00001663 230164 58213 357.72 331661 211112010 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 1,600.00 SEWER REC FEES 229857 020210 3,200.00 WATER REC FEES 229857 020210 8,000.00 SAC FEES 229857 020210 4090.6188 5841.6188 1550.6188 5911.6188 1628.6188 5631.6188 5621.6188 5861.6188 5821.6188 5841.6188 1470.6188 1622.6188 1646.6188 5511.6188 5932.6188 1550.6188 4090.6406 5422.6530 5910.6103 1553.6180 1553.6180 5901.4646 5901.4645 1495.4307 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS SEWER REC FEE WATER REC FEE SAC CHARGES 219/2010 15:38:34 Page - 21 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WELL PUMPS SENIOR CITIZENS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SKATING & HOCKEY BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY REVENUES UTILITY REVENUES INSPECTIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 335.00 CITY OF EDINA 2/9 12010 15:38:34 331667 211112010 123751 SECTIONAL HOCKEY TOURNAMENTS Council Check Register Page - 22 150.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 230202 012010 5210.6122 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 150.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 12,800.00 385.71 TOOLS 00001501 230167 142916 1301.6556 TOOLS 331662 211112010 385.71 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EO CO INC 331669 211112010 320.00 PAVINGIMILLING SCHOOL 229858 020210 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING BUSINESS CARDS 229863 63627 320.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.65 331663 2/1112010 331670 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 105099 SOUTHSIDE PRIDE 330.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00001101 230165 36674 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 140.00 330.00 331671 211112010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 331664 2/1112010 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 81.25 ART WORK SOLD 230259 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 112.80 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00001568 229859 MB02732428 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 162.71 BRAKE CLEANER DISPOSAL 00001560 229860 0040583428 1280.6271 HAZ WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 90.00 OIL FILTER DISPOSAL 00001560 229861 0040583429 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 365.51 331665 211112010 102435 SCHMITZER, DAVID 80.00 FOOD FOR RESCUE WORKERS 230166 020510 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 331666 211112010 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 335.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 229862 020210 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME PROGRAM GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER REVENUES 335.00 331667 211112010 123751 SECTIONAL HOCKEY TOURNAMENTS 150.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 230202 012010 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 150.00 331668 211112010 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 385.71 TOOLS 00001501 230167 142916 1301.6556 TOOLS 385.71 331669 211112010 101000 SIR SPEEDY 58.65 BUSINESS CARDS 229863 63627 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.65 331670 211112010 105099 SOUTHSIDE PRIDE 140.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 230168 28266 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 140.00 331671 211112010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 81.25 ART WORK SOLD 230259 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2111/2010 - 2/1112010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 219/2010 15:38:34 Page - 23 81.25 331672 211112010 104672 SPRINT 475.89 CARD READERS 230169 312188813 -026 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 475.89 331673 211112010 101004 SIPS COMPANIES 115.87 SHOWER PARTS 00002203 230170 S2156495.001 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 115.87 331674 211112010 101015 STREICHERS 598.49 AMMO FOR CLASSES 230171 1707440 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 598.49 331675 2/1112010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 150.00 VEHICLE REPAIR 00001668 230172 567945 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 312.31 VEHICLE REPAIR 00001669 230173 168251 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,757.35 VEHICLE REPAIR 00001150 230174 567577 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 748.13- CORE RETURN 00001137 230175 CM215192 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.90 MIRROR 00001625 230176 222194 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,556.43 331676 2/1112010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 360.50 BRAEMAR / EDINBOROUGH AD 230177 1229431 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 360.50 BRAEMAR I EDINBOROUGH AD 230177 1229431 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 721.00 331677 211112010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 512.00 229898 21524 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 455.00 230039 21561 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,287.00 230040 JM9924 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,254.00 331678 211112010 120560 SWEE, CINDY 98.80 ART WORK SOLD 230260 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 98.80 331679 2111/2010 118133 TCIC INC. 1,029.21 ANNUAL SUPPORT CONTRACT 00001272 229864 00083808 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,744.56 ANNUAL SUPPORT CONTRACT 00001272 229864 00083808 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,087.63 ANNUAL SUPPORT CONTRACT 00001272 229864 00083808 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 6,861.40 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2111/2010 - 2/1112010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 331680 211112010 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 123.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 229865 020210 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/912010 15:38:34 Page - 24 Business Unit PLANNING VERNON OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 123.50 EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 331681 2111/2010 111002 TEE JAY NORTH INC. 73.74 REPAIR PARTS 230178 13752 5861.6406 73.74 331682 2/1112010 125223 TELECOM SUPERSTORE 210.31 HEADSETS 00004302 230205 14929 1600.6710 230.76 HEADSETS 00004302 230205 14929 5913.6406 441.07 331683 211112010 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 47.99 AMP INSERTION TOOL 00001295 230182 31081 -01 1553.6556 47.99 331684 2/1112010 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 1,466.77 FLAGSTICKS, CUPS 00006163 230183 S121599 -IN 5422.6406 1,466.77 331685 211112010 123993 THERMAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. 793.00 BOILER ADJUSTMENTS 00002189 230179 201147 5620.6180 2,280.00 PUMP REPAIR 230180 201253 5620.6180 2,426.00 BASEBOARD HEAT REPAIR 230181 201252 5620.6180 810.00 ENTRYWAY FAN 230272 201165 5620.6180 782.00 FLUE REPAIR 230273 201164 5620.6180 7,091.00 331686 2/11/2010 125222 THOENY, GAYLE 375.00 8/14/10 RENTAL REFUND 229955 020210 5601.4555 375.00 331687 2111/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 5,430.20 230041 577881 5862.5514 102.55 230042 577883 5862.5515 5,532.75 331688 211112010 101474 TITLEIST 217.40 MERCHANDISE 230274 1246993 5440.5511 217.40 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/912010 15:38:34 Page - 24 Business Unit PLANNING VERNON OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EB /CL REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CONTINGENCIES CITY OF EDINA CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE Council Check Register EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2/11/2010 - 211112010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 331689 211112010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 40.80 WELDING CYLINDERS 00001578 230184 496201 1553.6580 40.80 331690 211112010 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 2,219.21 GRAPHICS DISPLAY & ETHERNET 00001548 229866 41269 1330.6215 2,219.21 331691 2/1112010 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 1,412.21 CYLINDERS 00001340 229922 167075 1553.6530 1,412.21 331692 2/1112010 115379 U.S. BANK 16.90 NET ZERO 230185 020210 1500.6103 78.20 INTERNET 230185 020210 1550.6155 57.28 SUPPLIES, PERMITS, TOOLS 230186 FEB0210 1301.6556 171.48 SUPPLIES, PERMITS, TOOLS 230186 FEB0210 1553.6260 495.98 SUPPLIES, PERMITS, TOOLS 230186 FEB0210 1553.6556 1,213.94 SUPPLIES, PERMITS, TOOLS 230186 FEB0210 1553.6585 2,033.78 331693 211112010 125032 UNI•SELECT USA 1,792.95 AUTO PARTS 229923 013110 1553.6530 1,792.95 331694 2111/2010 104223 UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT 1 666,592.59 TIF ASSISTANCE PAY 2009 230187 020410 1000.1303 666, 592.59 331695 211112010 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 165.00 SHADE TREE COURSE 00001099 230199 020510 1640.6104 165.00 331696 211112010 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 22.14 SHIPPING CHARGE 00001588 229952 TRAN:0940 5912.6180 15.68 SHIPPING CHARGE 00004352 230275 1703 1260.6406 13.66 SHIPPING CHARGE 00005615 230276 1709 5913.6103 51.48 331697 211112010 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 148.65 CUST 114300 230188 013110 5421.6511 Subledger Account Description WELDING SUPPLIES 2/9/2010 15:38:34 Page- 25 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/1112010 - 2111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 437.52 CUST 114300 230188 013110 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD FIRST AID SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING OTHER SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT 219/2010 15:38:34 Page - 26 Business Unit GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDINGS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 586.17 331698 211112010 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 69.01 OXYGEN 00003649 230189 885965 1470.6510 69.01 331699 2/11/2010 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 25.66 KING PIN, WASHER 00006167 230190 12510024 5422.6530 25.66 331700 211112010 124543 VFW PROGRAM BOOK 150.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 230201 011510 5210.6122 150.00 331701 2/1112010 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 131.40 GLOVES 00001379 229867 244193 5913.6610 84.84 LOCKS 00001379 229924 244380 5913.6610 216.24 331702 211112010 119454 VINOCOPIA 564.00 229899 0022509 -IN 5842.5513 150.25 229900 0022647 -IN 5862.5512 213.00 229901 0022663 -IN 5822.5513 927.25 331703 2111/2010 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 433.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 00002004 229925 27433608 5630.5510 433.42 331704 2111/2010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 62.07 LIGHTING SUPPLIES 00001504 229868 15147635 -00 1646.6578 62.07 331705 2111/2010 124847 WACHHOLZ MASONRY INC. 521.55 YORK LOADING DOCK 00004171 230277 1 /14 /10STMT 5800.1720 521.55 331706 211112010 124199 WEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES 480.00 NOV 2009 CONTRACT FOR CLEAR 230278 AB0002049223 1400.6103 480.00 FIRST AID SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING OTHER SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT 219/2010 15:38:34 Page - 26 Business Unit GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDINGS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 331707 2/1112010 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 99.00 CONFERENCE FEE 99.00 331708 2/1112010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 192.00 192.00 576.25 903.80 248.20 2,112.25 331709 211112010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 165.12 3,283.01 85.87 1.598.14 659.57 14.67 - 46.67- 24.55- 20.00- 6.83- 5,678.99 331710 211112010 117482 WINECONNECTINC. 159.24 WEB - FEB 2010 159.24 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2111/2010 - 2/11/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 230191 020610 1190.6104 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 219/2010 15:38:34 Page- 27 229902 235772 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229903 235774 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 230043 236056 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 230044 236055 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 230045 235941 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230046 305829 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230047 305831 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230048 305830 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 230049 305832 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 230050 305060 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230051 46461 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230052 46423 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230053 46422 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230054 46421 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230055 46420 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230192 441 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 331711 211112010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 4,085.00 230056 355602 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,306.17 230057 355682 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 115.01 230058 355683 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,222.55 230059 355681 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,548.95 230060 355601 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,665.95 230061 355600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,073.90 230062 354530 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,316.02 230063 355679 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 970.50- 230064 794873 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.65- 230065 794808 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 146.10- 230066 795194 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 80.00- 230067 794720 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 219/2010 15:38:34 Council Cheek Register Page - 28 2/1112010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 40.00- 230068 788459 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 26,076.30 331712 211112010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,260.96 229904 565986 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,160.50 229905 563691 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,049.50 229906 563689 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 229907 563690 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,725.20 229908 565970 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 72.00 230069 565771 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,469.80 230070 565770 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,729.75 230071 566747 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.00 230072 566748 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,362.76 230073 568533 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,468.00 230074 566209 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 160.00 230075 566210 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 30,518.50 331713 211112010 122046 WOMEN IN LEISURE SERVICES 65.00 WORKSHOP 229957 WILS 5631.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 65.00 331714 211112010 124870 WOODRICH, DENISE 50.05 ART WORK SOLD 230261 020410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.05 331715 211112010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 505.70 230076 242781 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 505.70 331716 211112010 102325 WORLD WATERPARK ASSOCIATION 100.00 WATER SAFETY FIRST KIT 229869 012910 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 331718 2/1112010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 33,918.32 51- 4621797 -2 229770 225864769 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,890.37 51- 9011854 -4 229771 225775923 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 305.53 51- 50054543 229772 225703053 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 116.79 51- 5938955 -6 229773 225886913 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 9.28 51- 60501842 229774 225890845 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 660.45 51- 56348142 229775 226038198 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 3,929.59 51- 9189085 -8 229776 225781619 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILr"" R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/9 12010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 29 2/1112010 - 2/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account-No. Subledger Account Description 6,690.48 51- 6955679 -8 229777 226061897 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,038.75 51- 6979948 -4 229778 226398705 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,487.20 51- 6979948 -4 229778 226398705 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,016.30 51- 6979948 -4 229778 226398705 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,337.29 51- 5547446 -1 229779 226037630 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER 232.12 51- 8987646 -8 229780 226098599 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 9.22 51- 9422326 -6 229781 226111604 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 214.62 51- 9337452 -8 229782 226114202 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 37.26 51- 6892224 -5 229783 225904068 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,026.57 51- 5107681 -4 229784 225704562 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER 39.08 51- 8102668 -0 229785 225756714 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 119.82 51- 8526048 -8 229786 225929715 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 440.04 51- 9251919 -0 229787 225942893 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER 9.28 51- 6541084 -2 229788 225898706 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 549.74 51- 8324712 -5 229789 225923549 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,128.44 51- 6223269 -1 229790 225724212 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER 61.29 51- 6692497 -0 229791 225734303 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER 182.01 51- 6229265 -9 229792 225890190 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,887.98 51- 6229265 -9 229792 225890190 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER 245.97 51- 4827232 -6 229793 225864530 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER 400.23 51- 6046826 -0 229794 225890785 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER 5,753.87 51- 4966303 -6 229795 226030960 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 67.91 51- 8997917 -7 229796 225936452 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 36.35 51- 8976004 -9 WINDSOR 229926 225948658 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 31.02 51- 8976004 -9 NORMANDALE 229927 226106587 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,416.70 51- 4159265 -8 230193 225858260 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER 19,092.25 51- 4888627 -1 230194 226526142 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,311.68 51- 5847121 -5 230195 226719761 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER 89,693.80 331719 2/11/2010 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 143.61 COPIER USAGE 230279 045541829 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 143.61 331720 211112010 50.00 50.00 331721 2/1112010 90.23 76.09 36.06- 125218 ZABEL, DEB RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 101091 ZIEGLER INC COUPLINGS, HOSE 0- RINGS, TUBE CREDIT CITY HALL GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PROMENADE BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR GOLF DOME PROGRAM CIVILIAN DEFENSE YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 229945 020210 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 00001527 229870 PC001185900 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 00001529 229871 PC001186320 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 229872 PR000114511 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/9 /2010 15:38:34 Council Check Register Page - 30 2111/2010 — 2111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 130.26 1,629,236.72 Grand Total PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,629,236.72 Total Payments 1,629,236.72 R55CKSUM L_ —/0000 CITY OF n 2/9120 :39:44 Council Check Summary Page - 1 2/11/2010 - 2/11/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 887,746.08 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,325.28 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 3,006.28 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 4,861.71 05100 'ART CENTER FUND 3,072.99 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 4,534.90 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,467.97 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 6,373.45 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 53,375.71 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 19,007.97 05800 LIQUOR FUND 250,580.34 05900 UTILITY FUND 386,892.63 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,956.10 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,035.31 Report Totals 1,629,236.72 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing poli ie and procedures -date .2 F I /n/1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 12/28/09 -1/25/10 Card Holder Jlerchanl Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/12/28 $30.00 ANNUAL MEETING MN RECREATION AND PARK 763- 571 -1305 MN 1600.6106 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/12/30 $286.16 EDINBOROUGH SUPPLIES PARTY CITY #770 COON RAPIDS MN 5621.6513 JOHN KEPRIOS 2009/12/30 $47.88 EDINBOROUGH SUPPLIES COUNTY MARKET ANDOVEF ANDOVER MN 5621.6513 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/04 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/07 $52.54 POSTAGE SUPPLIES PITNEY BOWES TELEMRKTI 800 - 243 -7824 CT 5621.5510 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/07 $150.45 SOCKS WALMART.COM WALMART.CONAR 5621.5510 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/12 $15.00 REGISTRATION MN RECREATION AND PARM 763- 571 -1305 MN 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/13 $30.00 ANNUAL MEETING MN RECREATION AND PARP763- 571 -1305 MN 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/14 $85.81 FIREPIT FRATTALLONES MINNETON MINNETONKA MN 1622.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/15 $165.00 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM CHASKA VALLEY FAMILY TF 952 - 3616424 MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/16 $35.61 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES* 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/19 $96.54 SKATING SUPPLIES DO IT BEST COMMERC 260 - 748 -5923 'IN 1622.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/21 $25.00 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM CHASKA VALLEY FAMILY TF 952 - 3616424 MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/01/22 $10.71 FIREWOOD SUPERAMERICA 04047 EDINA MN '1622.6406 DEB MANGEN 2010/01/22 $22.83 SEMINAR LUNCH THREE RIVERS LODGE LA CROSSE WI 1180.6104 DEB MANGEN 2010/01/23 $227.00 SEMINAR RADISSON LA CROSSE LA CROSSE WI 1180.6104 MIKE SIITARI 2009/12/28 $46.99 BLANK MEDIA DISK MERITLINE.COM 888 - 668 -6660 CA 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2009/12/28 $85.87 INK CARTRIDGE AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2010/01/11 $20.33 SPLITTER CABLE AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6160 MIKE SIITARI 2010/01/11 $429.50 ERT HEADSET ION INC.651- 773 -4193 651- 773 -4193 MN 1400.6406 MIKE SIITARI 2010/01/11 $14.34 STAFF MEETING PERKINS 00010058 EDINA MN 1400.6106 MIKE SIITARI 2010/01/15 $486.00 BATTERY FOR LIFEPAK AED SUPERSTORE WWW.AEDS.C(WI 1400.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/01/05 $79.99 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ASKNET- SHOPS.COM NERC +31 - 235548663 1554.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/01/05 $59.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE PAYPAL *1CLICKDVD 4029357733 QC 1554.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/01/07 $35.00 ULI EVENT REGISTRATION URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 800 - 321 -5011 DC 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/01/11 $592.16 OFFICE CHAIRS TARGET COMMERI0000001E952- 885 -7600 MN 5510.6513 JOHN WALLIN 2010/01/12 $49.99 COMPUTER SOFTWARE CBI *ACRONIS 866 - 522 -6855 IL 1554.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/01/19 $84.97 COUNCIL INTERVIEWS PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 $3,364.67 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects milth the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies nd Procedures date a"t (41 /o To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 16, 2010 Subject: Correspondence Received Since Last Council Meeting Info /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VII. A. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council. meeting. TIC PRUDENTIAL SPIRIT OF COMMUNITY AWARDS HONORING OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY SERVICE BY YOUNG AMERICANS February 9, 2010 The Honorable James Hovland 4801 W. 50`x' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland: RECEIVED FEB 1 1 2010 We thought you'd like to know that Shahrzad Mohtadi of Edina is today being named one of the top youth volunteers in Minnesota for 2010, in the 15th annual Prudential Spirit of Community Awards. This is an extraordinary honor; more than 21,000 young people across the country were considered for state -level recognition in this year's program. As a Distinguished Finalist in this year's program, Shahrzad will receive an engraved bronze medallion at a local ceremony. A -copy of the news release announcing this prestigious award is enclosed. The Prudential Spirit of Community Awards, created in 1995 by Prudential Financial in partnership with the National Association of Secondary School Principals ( NASSP), are designed to emphasize the importance our nation places on service to others, and to encourage all young Americans to contribute to their communities. Students like Shahrzad represent the best of America's youth, and are role models to their peers and their communities. We hope you will take advantage of this opportunity to extend your congratulations and encouragement. You can contact Shahrzad at 7609 Stonewood Court, Edina, MN 55439, (952) 903 -5224. You also may want to consider inviting your honoree to talk about volunteering and the importance of community service at an upcoming city council meeting, proclaiming a special day of recognition, or issuing an official statement of commendation (suggested language is included). If you would like additional information, please call (973) 802 -4568, write to us at spirit @prudential.com, or visit spirit.prudential.com. Congratulations for having such an outstanding young person in your city. Sincerely, John R. Strangfeld Chairman and CEO Prudential Financial 6tqll /t:-- V- Gerald N. Tirozzi Executive Director NASSP 751 Broad Street 16th Floor Newark, NJ 07102 (973) 8024568 Fax (973) 8024718 spirit@prudential.com spirit.prudential.com It To: EDINA CITY COUNCIL February 11, 2010 From: William Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 Subject: Case File 2010 - 0001 -10a My name is Bill Rodgers. My wife, Judith and I live on the corner of Arbour Lane and Tracy Ave, a tennis court and 2 houses beyond the proposed high rise, 4 story 150 unit assisted living facility (it is listed on the Waters website as 5 floors above ground) at 6200 Colonial Way, Edina. The picture in the Star Tribune also shows 5 floors. How many floors above ground is this business? We attended the planning commission meeting on January 27, 2010. When supporters of the Waters plan were asked to stand and a majority of the attendees rose it was a little intimidating. We wondered how many lived in the neighborhood and how many of those standing would want a 4 or 5 story building in their backyard. We are not against nursing homes. My father was confined to one until he was 93. My mother in law is presently in a nursing home in Waconia. She is 96. Both parents were in several nursing homes as their needs changed. None of the homes were in residential areas and none were 4 or 5 stories with 150 units. The only reason we can see for such a large facility is to maximize profits for the owners. Consider monthly costs average $4M -$7M. Our greatest concerns are the size of the proposed Waters Building, Its affect on property values and the traffic and safety issues that a four or five story 150 unit will generate. The nursing home in Waconia is a single story 37 unit facility that would look wonderful in Edina. A traffic study was made during the summer months and did not take into consideration the High School and Middle School traffic which includes back ups in the morning and evenings that make it difficult to exit Crosstown onto Tracy. With employees of the nursing home leaving and coming to work combined with young drivers and school buses it will result in safety issues. What was not mentioned in the Planning Commission Meeting are the service vehicles necessary to support 24/7 care - Food Service, Trash, Medical Care, Snowplowing and Lawn Service. The audience was also led to believe that there are few visitors to the patients. Will another traffic study be completed and will it consider all the issues related to a 24/7 business? Also consider your drive along Crosstown Highway. How many 4 or 5 story buildings do you see from the time you pass France Ave until you reach Highway 169? You are correct that whole area is considered residential and does not have large buildings other than schools, churches, a fire station, parks and green space. We talked to a realtor about property values around a multi story nursing home in our area. They said there would be some buyers that would not even look at a home in the vicinity of a high rise building. Our property values have already dropped due to the present economy. We do not need another drop in residential home values when a change is made to a residential area by approving a multi story nursing home and affordable housing. This area is not near a mall like the large Colony Senior Living facility in Eden Prairie that is three stories tall, not in a residential community and has the infrastructure to handle the 24/7 traffic safely. Please consider what approving. this project will do to the image of Edina, as a residential suburb,' and to the already declining home values. If you must approve home scale down the size and scope of the project to better fit the community. o Thank you, Bill Rodgers desirable a nursing from: Carol and Ben McPheeters 5525 Hansen Rd. #211, Edina MN 55436 RECEIVED FEB 12 1010 February 10, 2010 Re: your next meeting concerning The Waters Senior Living of Edina, 6200 Colonial Way To all Edina City Council Members We are like many Edina seniors who chose this community to raise our children, for its excellent schools, churches, variety of shopping, available recreational facilities, medical care and others. We also hope to continue to enjoy Edina's amenities when the time comes for a move to a place for assisted living or for necessary physical care. With the building of The Waters Senior Living of Edina, near the Crosstown 62 and Tracy Avenue, that opportunity opens up. The rental prices are affordable. Its location in central Edina and the careful planning of the available resources to residents is an attractive choice for us. Sincerely, Carol and Ben McPheeters Susan Howl -rom: Sent: To: Cc: Subject Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com Lynette Biunno Monday, February 08, 2010 9:57 AM John Keprios; Gordon Hughes Susan Howl FW: Edinburgh Park From: Shannon Wagner [mailto:shannon _ dillon @hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 9:50 AM To: Lynette Biunno; Shannon Wagner Subject: Edinburgh Park City of Edina Attention: City Council RECEIVED FEB 0b2010 have experienced the emergency services at Edinburgh Park within two (2) weeks span. Unfortunately, both were disappointing. My 4.year old child was injured by the doors exiting the Adventure Park, requiring he receive two (2) stitches over his leaf ear. The staff made an error by not supplying a first aid kit. I was supplied a lost and found kit that had a diaper, epi -pen and a type of spray. A member of the staff eventually came to check on us after we realized the kit was useless. My husband tried to get paper towels so we could clean our child up, but since the facility is going green, we used toilet paper and had to wet it. A staff member did come finally told us the kit we had was not the facilities. He did go to get gauze so we could cover his injury. The accident happened Saturday, January 9, 2010. No report was taken. The facility manager called me on Tuesday, January 12, 2010. We discussed the incident and I take full responsibility for my child and him getting injured. We discussed how the facility was under staffed. We talked about how I was unable to get the supplies I needed to care for my child. The result of the discussion: The staff is not trained to handle blood. They are to call the fire department as first responders. This did not happen. 2. The first aid kit is supposed to be available. This did not happen. 3. She offered us passes, which we did receive. This brings us to our next visit on Saturday, February 6, 2010. We thought we would try to facility again. After being there about an hour, I was in the structure with my child when he came upon a 4 year old girl bleeding from her mouth at the bottom of the open, blue wave slide. I scooped up the child and my child led the way out. The injured child was bleeding heavily throughout the structure while we were coming down and vomited outside the structure. I came better prepared this time and brought my own first aid kit. Again, the staff did not bring a first aid kit to the scene, only an ice pack. I did see a staff member go in the park to clean up the mess, but the play structure was not closed for clean up. This means, the children we playing where there was blood. The staff member did provide the injured child and me with clean shirts. An incident report was completed. Issues: 1. The structure should have been closed down to be cleaned, this was not done. 2. The first aid kit was not made available. 3. The fire department was no contacted. This facility requires better procedures and training on handling situations involving injuries, especially with injuries with blood. The response from the facility is "the fire department is the first responders and is to handle these types of situations." In both my experiences, this did not happen. The staff is not equipment with the knowledge or the abilities to handle emergencies. I am aware of the sign in the play area "play at your own risk ", bur with the population the facility is serving, there needs to be better procedures and a high level of training. I understand that the staff is not trained in first aid for the reason to protect them from blood borne pathogens, but who is protecting the public? There was exposure. There was no first aid kit made available. There needs to be a change in the response the staff provides. The population that you are serving does get hurt, does bleed and does need help. The staff needs to be prepared for such incidents. I would recommend that your staff receive improved training. If the City of Edina is incapable to provide training, I would suggest an outside provider. I would recommend: Chuck Emnett, CSP Manager, Safety & Environmental Services Employers Association, Inc. 9805 45th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55442 763.253.9164 (direct) 406.273.4395 (home office) With our two experiences in 28 days, we will definitely not be using the facility again. We will share our experience with our friends and encourage them not to use the facility also. If you would like to discuss this further, please contact me. Shannon Wagner 9290 Holly LN N Maple Grove, MN 55311 763 - 494 -8676 Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. Susan Howl Subject: FW: US169 Febuary Board Meeting Notice RECEIVED Subject: RE: US169 February Board Meeting Notice Greetings All, FEB 112010 Some of you are aware that Thursday is "Greater Mankato Day" at the capitol. The event concludes at 8 pm. I have made the difficult choice to be in St. Paul instead of attending the 169 meeting. City Engineer Jeff Johnson will be in attendance representing Mankato in fine fashion. The effort to move the meeting south was generous, I wish I could have taken advantage of the short commute but given the importance of the community needs in the bonding bill this session it takes priority. Moving forward, we have plenty of work to be done on State and Federal funding levels for the entire corridor and that will take several more meetings along with plenty of door knocking in St. Paul and Washington. Mankato and specifically myself are in this for the long term. Consistence and persistence efforts will provide return on the investment of time and money as we move forward. Sincerely, Mike Michael P. Laven President Mankato City Council www.ci.mankato.mn.us mlaven@city.mankato.mn.us 507- 351 -2630 507- 625 -8291 This email originated from a City of Mankato issued laptop. US 169 Corridor Coalition Board Meeting St. Peter Community Center Senior Center Room #219 600 South Fifth Street Saint Peter, MN February 11, 2010 7:00 P.M. AGENDA Per the board's direction the City of St Peter has graciously agreed to host the quarterly meeting that we will be holding on the southern portion of the US 169 corridor. We are continuing in our education theme and representatives from Gustavus College are presenting about the importance of the corridor to the college and we will have a second presentation about regional centers in rural Minnesota. I look forward to seeing you all on Thursday. The meeting will be held at the Community Center. The Community Center is located at 600 South Fifth Street in Saint Peter. The Meeting room is located on the Second floor. Directions to the Community Center are: From the north Continue on 169 (Minnesota Avenue) southbound into St. Peter, turn right onto Broadway Avenue, left on Washington Avenue and then the Community Center is on the left From the east Come into St. Peter on westbound Hwy 99, and at the intersection of Broadway and Washington, turn left and then the Community Center is on the left. From the south Continue on 169 (Minnesota Avenue) northbound into St. Peter, turn left onto College Avenue, and right on Washington and then the Community Center is on the right From the west Come into St. Peter on eastbound Hwy 99, and turn left onto Minnesota Avenue, turn left onto College Avenue, and right on Washington and then the Community Center is on the right Susan Howl 'rom: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:34 PM To: ED Everyone; 'Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle; scot.housh @willis.com Subject: January 2010 website report Good afternoon! Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of January 2010: Total visits: 89,430 Number of visitors: 47,001 Total number of hits: 5,274,561 Average time of each visit: 15 minutes, 4 seconds Total page views: 2,713,430 Average page views per day: 87,530 Busiest day of the month: Jan. 26 with 1,573,088 hits According to the statistics, the most popular page of our site was the "Tell a Friend" page with an email application. However, a spammer used the application to spam the internet the last week of January, resulting in hundreds of thousands of messages sent through our site. Once LOGIS discovered the problem, the feature was reprogrammed to prohibit that type of use in the future. Unfortunately, some of the statistics listed above were skewed as a result of the spammer's work. Centennial Lakes Park dominated the true top spot, indicating the importance of marketing our website and keeping it up to date. The most visited page was the Centennial Lakes Park home page, with 3,576 visits. Other top pages included the iollowing (with number of visits): Centennial Lakes Park skating — 2,985 Job Listings — 2,300. Park & Recreation Department -- 2,253 Edinborough Park - -1,943 Administration & Jobs - -1,740 Braemar Arena -- 1,608 Edinborough Park Adventure Peak -- 1,529 Telephone Numbers & Contacts - -1,463 Police Department - -1,424 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the new Park & Recreation Activities Directory, which was downloaded 10,180 times! That statistic is nearly five times higher than the average most popular PDF and seems to support the Park & Recreation Department's decision to discontinue printing and mailing the publication to the entire community. Other frequently downloaded files included the following (with number of downloads): Winter issue of About Town — 945 Family Circle magazine "Top 10 Towns" article — 849 Employment application — 805 Braemar Arena open skating schedule — 747 2010 City budget — 703 Community street map — 663 Annual water report — 659 May 4, 2008 Weekly Crime Report — 466 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report -- 434 Though the website has grown substantially in the past year, interest still needs to be generated among the public. To gain that interest and generate more hits, please attempt to include the Uniform Resource Locator (URL), www.CityofEdina.com, on all correspondence. We have been streaming video on our website for more than two years. The most requested videos in January were the Jan. 5 City Council meeting (123 views), January episode of "Agenda: Edina" (120), January episode of "In Edina" (92), Jan. 19 City Council meeting (76), Dec. 15 City Council meeting (47), January Park Board meeting (35), Jan.. 21 Rotary Club of Edina meeting (29), January Transportation Commission meeting (21), Dec. 1, 2009 City Council meeting (21) and the December /January episode of `Beyond the Badge (15). Please continue to tell others about our website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, please contact me. Thanks! Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 ibennerotte(c�ci.edina.mn.us M Good Afternoon, I'm writing to share a startling prospect: due to rising levels of childhood obesity, our Nation's youngest generation could actually face a shorter expected lifespan than its parents. That's unacceptable. As Americans, we all work tirelessly to provide a better world for the next generation. As a mother, I can'tell you that nothing is as important as a child's health. The problem is clear. Over the past three decades, childhood obesity rates in this country have tripled. Today, obesity and excess weight threaten the health of one out of three American children. It's time for us to act. That's why I'm asking you to be part of Let's Move! -- a nationwide effort to solve the obesity epidemic within one generation. Learn more here: Today, pediatricians treat children with high blood pressure, high cholesterol and even Type II diabetes. Teachers see bullying and teasing in class. School counselors see kids with depression and low self - esteem. Coaches see kids straggling to keep up or stuck on the sidelines. Obesity affects our economy as well. Our country spends nearly $15o billion treating obesity- related conditions like diabetes, heart disease and cancer. We can expect that number to grow unless healthv changes occur. z I hope you'll take a moment to join community leaders, teachers, doctors, nurses, moms and dads across the country. Together, we will work to help our kids eat better and lead active, healthy lives. Thank you, Michelle First Lady Michelle Obama The White House P.S. We've posted a special video about this effort to LetsMove.gov. Check it out. . VISIT WHITIrHOUSE.G OV The White House • 160o Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 •202 -456 -1111 Susan Howl tubject: FW: March 12 - Local Goverment Sustainability Workshop Invitation From: Sean Gosiewski [mailto:sean @afors.org] RECEIVED Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:27 AM FEB 10 2010 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: March 12 - Local Goverment Sustainability Workshop Invitation Dear Metro area local government staff, elected and citizen leaders, Please plan to join the Alliance for Sustainability, MPCA Sustainable Communities Team and League of Minnesota Cities and Metro Cities for our 3rd Annual Local Government Sustainability Workshop, on Friday March 12 Noon to 5pm at Central Lutheran Church (next to the Minneapolis Convention Center) to learn about new state and federal funding opportunities for your projects and simple, cost - effective best practices from the state's new MN GreenSteps Cities Program. Through the support of generous sponsors, we are offering the workshop free of charge, please pre - register today at http: / /www.afors.org/ or by calling us at 612 - 331 -1099 and invite others you know to attend as well. Thanks! Our keynote speakers include Mayor Elizabeth Kautz, Mayor, City of Burnsville and President, U.S. Conference ofMayors Jeanne Hoffman, City of Madison Facilities and Sustainability Manager, and Amy Malick Midwest Regional Director ICLEI/ Local Governments for Sustainability Who should attend? - Mayors, City Administrators, City Council Members, building engineers, storm water professionals, planners, recycling coordinators, city foresters, and planning and citizen environmental commission members, environmental professionals and citizen volunteers. Workshop Topics - MN GreenSteps Cities, using sustainability indicators, funding for energy retrofits and renewable energy projects, Complete Streets, protecting and diversifying urban forests, organized collection and organics waste collection, sustainability ordinances, community -wide energy initiatives, Blue Star Cities, local food policies and urban and suburban place making. The free Friday March 12 Local Government Workshop - Agenda Workshop Flyer will be followed by a free Saturday March 13 Neighborhood Sustainability Conference for community volunteers from neighborhoods, congregations and schools. Agenda Conference Flyer Please pre - register on -line today to let us know you will be attending and forward our invitation to other staff, elected leaders or citizen volunteers from your community who may also want to attend. Sustainably, Sean Gosiewski, Program Director, Alliance for Sustainability 612 - 331 -1099 sean(a@afors.org www.afors.org Third Annual Local Government Workshop — Friday March 12, Noon to 5pm Central Lutheran Church, 333 12th Street South, Minneapolis 55404 (next to the Minneapolis Convention Center) FREE please pre - register on line at www.afors.org or call 612- 331 -1099. Box lunch $5, Parking $8 Conference Sponsors Alliance for Sustainability, MPCA Sustainable Communities Team and League o Minnesota Cities, Metro Cities, Cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Hennepin County Ramsey County, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Mississippi Watershed Management Organization, Barr Engineering, Bonestroo, Center for Energy and Environment, Emmons & Olivier Resources, Shuler Shook, Transit for Livable Communities , Eureka Recycling, Nobel Conservation Solutions, Sanders, Walker Bergly, Xcel Energy , Sustainability Associates, Please call us at 612 - 331 -1099 if your organization would like to sponsor or exhibit at the event Goals 1. Link local governments with grants and innovative funding tools for their sustainability projects. 2. Highlight effective sustainability best practices included in the new MN GreenSteps Cities Program. 3. Help cities simplify their sustainability efforts by using sustainability indicators to focus city operations, ordinances and community engagement to achieve common goals & report on progress. Audience 400 local government staffand elected officials, citizen and business leaders will learn about model policies and ordinances they can adopt to save money on city buildings, pay for ash tree removal, fund innovative storm water management projects, expand pedestrian, bike and transit networks, reduce costs of road repair and waste management, spur economic development and enhance livability. Noon - Networking, Exhibitors, Light Lunch - Box lunches available for $5 please pre- order. Keynote 12:45 pm Creating consensus for local action. Bridging differences to get projects done. New state and federal funding opportunities for city sustainability projects. Overview of Burnsville's Sustainability Guide Plan - Mayor Elizabeth Kautz, Mayor, City of Burnsville and President, US. Conference of Mayors Making sustainability simple. How Madison is using the Natural Step to guide changes in city operations, ordinances and community engagement to meet their goals and report their results to residents- Jeanne Hoffman, City of Madison Facilities and Sustainabilily Manager, City of Madison New Tools from Local Governments for Sustainability Amy Malick Midwest Regional Director ICLEI/ Local Governments for Sustainability — Highlighting ICLEIs new Climate and Air Pollution Planning Support Tool and Sustainability Tool Kit. Workshops - 2:00 to 3:10 Local government staff, elected officials and topic experts will share successful projects and new funding opportunities and will engage participants to share insights from their cities. Overview of the new MN GreenSteps Cities Program. Cost effective best practices and technical assistance to help you city reduce it's energy costs, meet sustainability goals and receive recognition. Phillip Muessig, MPCA, Sustainable Communities Team, Diana McKeown, Metro Clean Energy Resource Team Using Sustainability Indicators and the Natural Step to focus city efforts to green city operations, ordinances and community and business engagement - Jeanne HoffmanCity of Madison, Office of Sustainability, Gayle Prest, Sustainability Manager, City of Minneapolis Funding Available for City Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Projects — Overview of state and federal grant opportunities and how to decide which grants to pursue. Public Buildings Enhanced Energy Efficiency Program.MN Office of Energy Security. Public solar projects financing options, cost benefit analysis, PACE legislation - Minneapolis and St. Paul Solar Cities Project, Brian Ross, CR Planning. Creating safe pedestrian and bike networks through Complete Streets policies — municipal leaders will highlight ways citizens and city councils can create safe and convenient pedestrian, bike and transit links to new transit corridors and regional trails. How the proposed State of MN Complete Streets Policy will offer municipalities added flexibility. Overview of state and foundation grants for bike and pedestrian planning. Protecting and Diversifying Healthy Urban Forests. Updates on state funding sources to for ash tree removal and replanting diversified urban forests. Balancing needs for shade and storm water mitigation with solar access and food production. Fruit and nut tree options. Protecting priority elm and ash. Model Tree Policies, Ken Holman, MN DNR, John Uban, Principal Bonestroo. Saving money and resources through organized collection, organics waste collection and tiered pricing. Hear the results of the new MPCA study that shows the multiple environmental and financial benefits of cities switching to organized collection - Sig Scheurle and Peder Sandhei MPCA, Eureka Recycling (invited) Workshops - 3:20 to 4:30pm MN Green Step Cities Pilot Communities Roundtable — staff and elected officials from Edina, St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Falcon Heights have been invited to share their sustainability initiatives and how they are engaging resident and businesses. Urban Lands Institute/Regional Council of Mayors (invited.) Implementing your Comprehensive Plan with innovative ordinances — Local examples of cities that are improving building performance, expanding recycling, ensuring low- impact development and meeting other comp plan goals through updating ordinances. St. Paul's new green building ordinance. Examples of Cities that are developing or implementing Comprehensive sustainability plans — Mahtomedi, Burnsville, St. Cloud, David Wanberg and Kelsey Johnson, Sanders Wacker Bergly, Inc. Ellen Brown, The Brown Partners Community-Wide Energy Efficiency Initiatives — learn how Apple Valley, Minneapolis and St. Paul are leveraging utility resources and state and federal funds to retrofit hundreds of homes and businesses. Staff from Minneapolis, St. Paul, Apple Valley, Center for Energy and Environment, Neighborhood Energy Connection and Metro Clean Energy Resource Team (invited.) Blue Star Cities — Improving water quality through comprehensive strategies and innovative funding models - Brett Emmons, Emmons Olivier Resources, Trevor Russel, Friends of the Mississippi River Local Food Policies — local examples of how cities are developing and implementing policies to expand farmers markets, community, school and backyard gardens, small enterprise urban agriculture and commercial use of locally grown foods —Julie Ristau, On the Commons (invited) Ila Dunteman Gardening Matters (invited) Jeanne Hoffman City of Madison (invited) Urban and Suburban Placemaking — How the City Repair Project in Portland Oregon works with neighborhood residents to reclaim public spaces through public art and planting to build community, calm traffic and restore habitat. Mark Lakeman, City Repair Project and Communitechture, Portland Oregon, Two metro communities will share place making examples, 4:30 to 5:00 Networking, exhibitors, reception forlocal government staff, elected officials and citizen leaders. With local, organic food provided by local restaurants. Conference Sponsors Alliance for Sustainability, MPCA Sustainable Communities Team and Lea e o Minnesota Cities, Metro Cities, Cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Ramsey County, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Mississippi Watershed Management Organization, Barr Engineering, Bonestroo, Center for Energy and Environment, Emmons & Olivier Resources, Shuler Shook, Transit for Livable Communities, Eureka Recycling, Nobel Conservation Solutions, Sanders, Walker Bergly, Xcel Energy , Sustainability Associates, Please call us if your organization would like to sponsor or exhibit at the event. Thanks Contact: Sean Gosiewski, Program Director, Alliance for Sustainability 612 - 331 -1099 sean ,afors.org www.afors.org , We are also hosting a related event the following day for community volunteers from neighborhoods, block clubs, congregations and schools. Please invite volunteers from your community to attend. THANKS 5th Annual Neighborhood Sustainability Conference Saturday March 13 8:30am to 4:30pm, Central Lutheran Church, 333 12th Street South, Minneapolis 55404 (next to the Minneapolis Convention Center) FREE please pre- register at http : / /www.afs.nonprofitoffice.com or call the Alliance for Sustainability 612 - 331 -1099 Box lunch $5, Parking $5 Find great resources for your spring and summer projects for your block club, neighborhood, congregation or school including funding sources, project tool kits and successful project ideas from other neighborhoods. Network with volunteers from your own neighborhood and with 500 volunteers from other metro communities February 9, 2010 EDINA CITY COUNCIL City Hall 4801 W 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council, RECEIVED FEB 121010 RE: Colonial Church Development Recently I moved to Nine Mile Village, which is adjacent to Colonial Church in Edina. While I welcome the Church as a neighbor, I am concerned about the size of their Preliminary Development Plan for senior assisted living. A four story building, with 150 units in a small space, is simply oversized in height and density for this part of Edina. This is a residential area, and one of the reasons I moved here was the village atmosphere. A very large four story building overwhelms all other structures and renders your current zoning code as meaningless. I suggest that the city explore methods to reduce the size and height of this proposal so that it is more in harmony with the community history and residential zoning in the area. Sincerely, all Peter P Bundy 6344 Pheasant Ct. Edina, MN 55436 cc: Nine Mile Village Board Edina Planning Dept. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Funding for Minnesota (Pedestrian Countdown Units) RECEIVED Subject: RE: Funding for Minnesota (Pedestrian Countdown Units) FEB 10 2010 Metroplex Citiworks 20832 Roscoe Blvd. #102 Canoga Park, CA 91306 Phone: 877-599-2713 Fax: 310 - 734 -6140 email: safety1st(d)metroalex.us.com http://www.metroplexcitiworks.com/ 2/9/10 Attention City Council Members: We are collecting signatures to install Early Warning Lights (Pedestrian Countdown Units) at all pedestrian crossings in your city. Funding is now available for installation. Please respond by calling us toll free @ 877 - 599 -2713 or e-mail us at safety1st@)metroplex.us.com so that we can determine your needs. Thank you, Jack Lawrence Metroplex Citiworks Susan Howl Subject: FW: Domestic partners Subject: Domestic partners RECEIVED FEB 10 2010 Dear Edina Council Members, I was thrilled to read that the Council is considering DP benefits and registry. I am proud to be an Edina resident for the past 19 years. While we have experienced only good from our friends and neighbors in Edina, such was not the case at work. My partner and I joined several others in "helping" the University of Minnesota understand that equal means equal for all. Even though we still do not have the 1000 plus federal rights that heterosexual marriaged people do, we are pleased to have retiree health benefits so that we could retire and dive into our volunteering. No one should have to go through the strategizing and information assembling that we did on an issue which is simply about fairness. If you would like more info about our experiences, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your good work. Sincerely, Judith Reisman 4235 Alden Dr. Edina 55416 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Let's Move RECEIVED FEB 10 1010 From: White House Intergovernmental Affairs [mailto:mayors @who.eop.gov] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:49 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Let's Move February 9, 2010 Dear Mayor & City Staff: Today, First Lady Michelle Obama launched a nation -wide movement to end childhood obesity within a generation. Recognizing that the status quo is simply unacceptable, she issued a powerful call for action: the movement will be titled, "Let's Move!" In the coming months and years, the First Lady will be engaging leaders across the country, including public and private institutions and our nation's mayors, in this comprehensive effort. Please visit www.LetsMove.gov for additional details. I have attached below a message from the First Lady. Please let us know if you would like to be engaged on this issue, and we will make sure our team stays in touch with you as this moves forward. We know that mayors have a critical to role to play in this movement, and we look forward to working with you. As always, thank you. Sincerely yours, David Agnew Deputy Director White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs (202) 456 -4758 dasnew @who.eoo.eov TIE PRUDENTIAL, SPIRIT OF COMMUNITY AWARDS HONORING OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY SERVICE BY YOUNG AMERICANS February 9, 2010 The Honorable James Hovland 4801 W. 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland: RECEIVED FEB 112010 We thought you'd like to know that Shahrzad Mohtadi of Edina is today being named one of the top youth volunteers in Minnesota for 2010, in the 15`h annual Prudential Spirit of Community Awards. This is an extraordinary honor; more than 21,000 young people across the country were considered for state -level recognition in this year's program. As a Distinguished Finalist in this year's program, Shahrzad will receive an engraved bronze medallion at a local ceremony. A.copy of the news release announcing this prestigious award is enclosed. The Prudential Spirit of Community Awards, created in 1995 by Prudential Financial in partnership with the National Association of Secondary School Principals ( NASSP), are designed to emphasize the importance our nation places on service to others, and to encourage all young Americans to contribute to their communities. Students like Shahrzad represent the best of America's youth, and are role models to their peers and their communities. We hope you will take advantage of this opportunity to extend your congratulations and encouragement. You can contact Shahrzad at 7609 Stonewood Court, Edina, MN 55439, (952) 903 -5224. You also may want to consider inviting your honoree to talk about volunteering and the importance of community service at an upcoming city council meeting, proclaiming a special day of recognition, or issuing an official statement of commendation (suggested language is included). If you would like additional information, please call (973) 802 -4568, write to us at spirit @prudential.com, or visit spirit.prudential.com. Congratulations for having such an outstanding young person in your city. Sincerely, John R. Strangfeld Chairman and CEO Prudential Financial Gerald N. Tirozzi Executive Director NASSP 751 Broad Street 16th Floor Newark, NJ 07102 (973) 802 -4568 Fax (973) 802 -4718 spirit@prudential.com spirit prudential.com Susan Howl Subject: FW: Funding for Minnesota (Pedestrian Countdown Units) RECEIVED Subject: RE: Funding for Minnesota (Pedestrian Countdown Units) FEB 10 2010 Metroplex Citiworks 20832 Roscoe Blvd. #102 Canoga Park, CA 91306 Phone: 877- 599 -2713 Fax: 310 - 734 -6140 email: safetvlst(almetroalex.us.com http://www.metroplexcitiworks.com/ 2/9/10 Attention City Council Members: We are collecting signatures to install Early Warning Lights (Pedestrian Countdown Units) at all pedestrian crossings in your city. -Funding is now available for installation. Please respond by calling us toll free @ 877 - 599 -2713 or e-mail us at safetylst(apmetroplex.us.com so that we can determine your needs. Thank you, Jack Lawrence Metroplex Citiworks Susan Howl Subject: FW: Domestic Partners From: Jane Levin [mailto:jjkiwi @gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 8:04 PM To: Lynette Biunno RECEIVED Subject: Domestic Partners FEB 0 b` 1010 Dear City Council Members: My partner and I have lived in Edina for 17 years. I am writing to urge you to enact all of the recommendations regarding domestic partners. When I was diagnosed at 51 years old with late -stage ovarian cancer, we wanted to retire. My prognosis was very poor and we didn't want to spend the rest my life working. But we couldn't retire because I wasn't eligible to continue my insurance and my partner's employer would not cover domestic partners for retirees. It is the right and fair thing to establish a domestic partner registry and offer domestic partner benefits to Edina residents and employees. Sincerely, Jane Levin 4235 Alden Dr. Edina, MN 55416 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for domestic partner recommendation RECEIVED FEB 0 U 2010 From: William and Lee [mailto:williamandlee @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 6:31 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for domestic partner recommendation Dear Edina City Council, As Edina residents, we are writing to ask for your support of the recommendations from the Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission, urging a variety of updates to city policies and ordinances to incorporate domestic partners. These important changes would provide necessary updates to homestead registrations, access to municipal facilities, and employee family -leave time, as well as an Equal Benefits Ordinance modeled on one in Minneapolis, related to city contracting. As a same -sex couple in Edina, we look forward to the additional protections that your action will provide. We must take significant actions to protect our relationship that opposite sex - couples need not consider, including seeking legal protections at our own cost that at most can only begin to address a small handful of the 515+ Minnesota state laws, and 1100+ federal laws that treat our family unequally including rights, responsibilities and obligations. In addition, we strive for equal recognition of our relationship, and recognize that your action are important steps on the path to equality. if any members of the council are opposed to this action, I ask that you please contact us to discuss your concerns. Also, if you are interested in the vast level of discrimination against same -sex couples embodied in Minnesota law, please visit www.oroiect515.oro for more information about the 515 state laws that discriminate. Sincerely, Lee Anderson (4th Generation Edinian, EHS Class of 1990, and Chair of Project 515) & William Fehrenbach (Together since 1995, married in a religious ceremony in 1998, and received a marriage license both in Canada and Vermont) 4006 West 44th Street, Edina 612 - 865 -3925 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please support domestic partnership recommendations RECEIVED F o 0 4 2010 From: Leslie Held [mailto:lheld18 @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:29 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please support domestic partnership recommendations I am encourageing the Edina City Council to support the domestic partnership recommendation. Many Gay and Lesbian families I know will be positively affected by a new domestic partnership ordinance. Thanks Leslie Held, 5929 Ewing Av. S Edina, MN 55410 To: EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION January 28, 2010 From: William Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 My name is Bill Rodgers. My wife, Judith and I live about two blocks from the proposed 4 story 150 unit assisted living facility at 6200 Colonial Way, Edina. We attended the planning commission meeting on January 28, 2010. When supporters were asked to stand at the meeting and a majority of the attendees stood, that was a little intimidating. We wondered how many lived in the neighborhood and how many would want a 4 story building in their backyard. Some of our concerns that were touched on and others that we did not voice at the meeting include the following: • The fact that a 4 story building is being considered does not fit in with a residential area. When we purchased our home the fact that this was a nice, quiet neighborhood was a major reason we purchased our home. • With the economy situation, we have lost value on our home along with many other home owners. We feel that building a 4 story nursing facility in the neighborhood will reduce home values even more. • Nursing homes are an industry that is growing and changing. From our personal experience nursing homes are scaling down in size. A 4 story 150 unit facility is too large in this area. • My 96 year old mother -in -law has been in two "green house" units that are more like homes with 6 -12 seniors. I forwarded an e-mail describing these units. She is now in a 1 story 34 unit nursing home in Waconia that is supported by the Moravian Church. Again this is a way to scale down the scope of the proposed 4 story 150 unit Facility. Traffic and the safety of school children and residents is a major concern. Presently traffic is an issue during school hours. Many students drive to and from school or are given rides by their families. In addition school buses are lined up on Tracy for several blocks during morning and evening schools start and close. The school even has a traffic person directing traffic during these hours. Consider there are inexperienced drivers and then the addition of the employees of the nursing homes rushing to and from work. Shift change at the nursing home would include up to 90 (45 employees per shift) nursing home employees leaving and coming to the facility between 7 - 9 AM and 3 - 5 PM. This additional traffic will add to the safety issues. ■ In addition, 90 employees will be coming and going at 10 - 11 PM. This will create traffic that we do not have now or need in a residential neighborhood. Many factories do not have shift changes any larger than this. With 150 seniors there will be additional traffic that was not considered during the meeting, examples include: doctors, vendors, specialists, buses and vans taking seniors shopping and to appointments, waste pickups, cleaner and laundry services and delivery vans such as UPS and Fed Ex. The nursing home industry requires deliveries and services from other industries that use trucks and vans. This is traffic that we do not have now. Consider this is a residential neighborhood. ■ Visitors are another issue that was down played at the meeting. If only half of the residents have visitors that amounts to 75 cars coming and going between a couple of hours in the evenings. ■ We also do not understand the financial relationship between the Colonial Church and the Waters Senior Living Company. How much of the profit will be shared with the church and will it be taxable income to the church? Thank you listening and for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Bill Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 - 927 -9421 o e .�y To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 16, 2010 Subject: Correspondence Info /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VII. A. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. Susan Howl ubject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 RECEIVED Subject: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 FEB 16 2010 1 am responding to the announcement that a decision will be made tonight in response to a letter sent on behalf of the residents of Ridge Road (presented by Betsy Robinson). As I understand, the recommendations that will be presented to the council are as follows: Recommendation; There are two options the City Council may take based on the Community Comment by Betsy Robinson at the January 15 City Council Meeting, these are: 1. Request the Ridge Road Residents file a petition to have the City prepare a feasibility Study to reconstruct Ridge Road for the 2011 reconstruction season. 2. Request engineering to prepare feasibility study this fall to reconstruct the roadway for the 2011 reconstruction season. , I do not believe that any of the residents of Ridge Road are requesting a full feasibility study or a reconstruction of the street that could possibly involve widening, curb and gutters or new sewers. This is not what the residents have requested in the letter provided by Betsy on our behalf, rather we have requested that the surface of the road be repaired properly with a mill and overlay process to eliminate the many cracks, potholes, and pavement imperfections that are now causing dangerous driving and walking conditions. Sincerely, Perry Witkin 5112 Ridge Road Edina, MN 55436 612 - 369 -6580 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 RECEIVED Subject: Fwd: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 FEB 16 A Anne Rutledge and Anne Charity, 5116 Ridge Road, Edina, MN 953- 935 -4845: We totally agree with Mr Witkin's response. Our January 15th letter does not request a feasibility study or reconstruction. We requested our road be repaired properly with a mill and overlay to eliminate damage that has occurred and is dangerous for walking, riding, biking, running, and driving. Susan Howl ibject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 From: Joe McErlane [ mailto :joemcerianesr @hotmaii.com] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:44 PM FEB 16 2010 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 We concur with Anne Rutledge, Anne Charity and Perry Witkin re: mill and overlay repair to Ridge Road. Joseph and Florence Mcerlane, 5120 Ridge Road. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Human Rights Commission recommendations RECEIVED FEB 16 2010 Subject: Human Rights Commission recommendations To the Council: I applaud the recommendations of the Human Rights Commission to create a domestic partnership registry and institute other equal benefits reforms. I am a lesbian living in Edina and I am not always comfortable being open about my sexual orientation in this community. It would be a big step forward for the city to move forward with these recommendations, and it would bring me closer to having equal rights as a lesbian. It would make me even more proud to be an Edinan. Eleanor Wagner, 5529 Vernon Ave. South, Edina, MN 55436; 952 - 922 -7703 Susan Howl ubject: FW: Watershed Rules To: Mayors of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Dear Fellow Mayors, RECEIVED FEB 16 1010 Most of you are aware of the changes being proposed by the MCWD that affect your city and residents. You have also become aware of the impact it will make to your city in the form of loss of zoning authority, increased costs to the cities, and reduced effectiveness of shoreline erosion. Most cities in the Watershed have submitted letters outlining their opposition to all or part of these rule changes. I thank you for your interest and reaction to these rules that will have minimal or even.reduced effect, but come at a much higher cost than exist today. Hennepin County has also taken the position that many of these changes are too burdensome and not necessary. Even the Minneapolis Parks Board is opposed to some of the rule changes. As you may be aware, the County Board is the appointing authority of the Board of Managers to the Watershed. Their opposition is very meaningful and can have great impact on these rules, as can the cities in the District. It has been suggested that the Mayors or city staff of each city should write a very short letter to their respective County Commissioner expressing their opposition to these rules. It doesnt have to go into detail or point by point. A simple letter or email expressing your opposition is all that is necessary. It will help them form their position now, and in the future. Just for the record, the City of Mound is a very good steward of the lake. In fact, we received the Watershed Hero Award for governmental bodies from the MCWD last year. But we feel they are going way overboard. They will not improve the water quality by the proposed methods but only create more costs. Therefore, the position of the City of Mound.is in apposition to any of the proposed changes. We feel that there methods to improve water quality that are more effective it less burdonsome at the same time. I thank you for your interest and urge you to write a short email or letter to your County Commissioner. I also recommend that you watch the Watershed website for the public hearings that will be scheduled on Rules D and F. Please have someone attend these hearings from your city to further voice your opposition to these rule changes. Most Respectfully, Mark Hanus Mound Mayor Susan Howl Subject: FW: domestic partnership recommendation Subject: domestic partnership recommendation RECEIVED To Council Members, FEB 161010 Ms. Joni Bennett Ms. Mary Brindle Mr. Scot Housh Ms. Ann Swenson As you know, the Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission recently sent a package of recommendations to the Edina City Council advocating the creation of a domestic partnership registry and other equal- benefits reforms. I encourage you to support an ordinance that would positively affect gay and lesbian couples in the city of Edina. Thank you, Rev. Tyler Christiansen 6117 Chowen Ave S. Edina, MN 55410 Susan Howl ubject: FW: City Council Question RECEIVED Hello, FEB 161010 I don't live in Edina, but I work in Edina. I recently came across some information that the City Council is going to review a proposal about Domestic Partnership Registry in Edina. I have some strong opinions about Domestic Partner Registries and benefits, and I would like to share how my company has made a difference in so many people's lives. Is the City Council interested in hearing the opinions of people who work in Edina, or just those who live in Edina? Thank you for your time, Kelly Fitzgerald Kelly A Fitzgerald Environmental, Health, and Safety Delivery Technician FilmTec Corporation Dow Water & Process Solutions 5400 Dewey Hill Road Edina, MN 55439 Office: 952- 897 -4259 Cell: 612- 559 -0375 Susan Howl Subject: FK 1-494 and Highway 169 RECEIVED Subject: I -494 and Highway 169 FEB 16 2010 I was told two years ago that the 3 cities would compromise and give on those local road changes to get the main objective done sooner than later. I just reviewed the two designs ( "performance" and policy design) for the removal of the stop lights at 169 and 1 -494. The majority of the costs are still for local access roads and bridges. It still appears we are bogged down in numerous costs associated with local wants for both designs. The Feds want the policy design that would allow traffic to flow in all directions between 169 and 1494. The MNDOT says that we could save 30 to 40 million if we only provided flow for six directions rather than 8. Why the Feds won't bend is beyond me since we have exception all over the Metro area. Take out all of the local wants and wishes and we could have the policy design and federal funding soon with significant savings. Otherwise we will continue to watch cars run red lights and t -bone other cars and rear end cars on 1 -494 and 169. How many of these accidents have resulted in lose of life (I remember the child restraint on the shoulder of 1 -494 in which the baby died) and life changing injuries. How much noise and air pollution is generated by stopping and accelerating? Gregg Harcus 9822 Belmont Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55347 1 RECEIVED Susan Howl FEB 16 7010 Mayor Rybak on Governor's Budget: Communities to Bail out Pawlenty for Inability to Structurally Balance Budget Homeowners across Minnesota will pay more for fewer basics February 15, 2010 (MINNEAPOLIS) - Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak made the following statement in reaction to Governor Tim Pawlenty's proposal to cut $118 million in Local Government Aid to communities across Minnesota. "Homeowners and business owners across Minnesota are once again being asked to bail out the governor, who has proven incapable of getting the state's budget under control. For eight years the state's fiscal situation has gone from bad to worse — and yet communities large and small across Minnesota have managed to structurally balance their budgets. "Despite these communities' hard work, if the governor's budget becomes law, all over Minnesota people will pay more property taxes — while having to drive over unrepaired roads and bridges and having fewer police and firefighters to rely on to keep us safe. "In tough times everyone has to do their share — but local communities have already done more than their share. As just one example, during the,time the governor and I have been in office, state spending on his watch has risen 12 percent while city spending on my watch has risen one percent. We have cut costs, reformed government and forged new partnerships to create jobs, nurture our youth and keep people safe. "The governor should take responsibility for his inability to do the same and stop passing the buck onto homeowners. "In the long term, we should work in partnership with mayors, elected officials and community leaders around our state to restructure local government inMinnesota — but Governor Pawlenty's budget today doesn't do that. Instead, the governor has chosen to lob a political grenade while passing off his longstanding problems onto local communities and taxpayers." Quick facts about Local Government Aid to Minneapolis: • Even before today's proposal, LGA to Minneapolis has been cut 42 %, or $290 million, since 2003. • Since 2003, property taxes have gone from comprising 29% of the City's revenue to 47% of the City's revenue. • Since 2003, state aids have gone from comprising 40% of the City's revenue to 19% of the City's revenue. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Ridge Road Street Project Subject: Ridge Road Street Project RECEIVED FEB 14 1010 My husband and I have lived at 5025 Ridge Road for 13 years. We have had major water damage from rain water from Ridge Road going down our driveway which had water running down the northside of our home like a stream. This water went into our foundation which we have had to spend thousands of dollars to redirect the street water and redo our landscape. We are hoping that you vote for option 2 tonight. We really need our road fixed but we don't want to have it done without the neighbors and city working this out together. We all pay top taxes and would appreciate making this a win win for Edina as well as the residents of Ridge Road. Please vote for option 2. Thanks you for helping our Ridge Road. Chuck and Corky Carlsen Susan Howl 'ubject: FW: ridge road repairs RECEIVED FEB 1 1010 Subject: FW : ridge road repairs > To City Council Members and Honorable Mayor Jim Hovland > I, bean bovolis, of 5009 Ridge Road, Edina, MN am simply requesting a repair to our street not a complete reconstruction. I know from my architectural and engineering background that a reconstruction may be the most prudent way for a long term solution. However, given the economic situation that we, and many of our neighbors, find ourselves in we need to create a solution that addresses repairs only and not a solution that creates an assessment. Given the Governors budget proposal, our property taxes are only guaranteed to escalate. This development along with a street reconstruction property tax assesment makes it impassable to stay in our homes. I am willing to work with our City to find a solution that creates minimal expense to the City and avoids a street assessment. Thank you for your consideration. > Sincerely, > bean bovolis 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attention City Council Members RECEIVE Subject: Ridge Road FEB 16 2010 Dear Council Members; It has come to my attention that the issue of Ridge Road repair request is to be considered tonight at the Council meeting. Had Council member, Joni Bennett, not emailed me with this information our neighborhood would not have known this fact. It was stated at the Council meeting after our presentation that Staff would notify Betsy Robinson (designated neighborhood contact) with the date our issue would be heard regarding this matter. They did not! Adding to the lack of communication by the city, once finding the meeting's agenda for tonight and trying to open the Staff Report to see the Engineering Department's recommendations the information was not accessible. Communication is paramount to good governance. I had expected better from Edina! As to the recommendations made by the Engineering Dept. which I finally got this morning, the following are my thoughts: 1. No mention or consideration was given to the present (2010) requests made at the last meeting. Engineering provided historical information with no substantiation for a reconstruction (other than in 2004 they thought it needed to be done). Show us the facts! This seemed to be related to past drainage problems experienced on the easterly side. Did they not hear the fact that the owners of those properties have fixed these problems at their own expense, a problem the city would not help resolve for 20+ years? Now the city wants to come in and fix something that is already fixed and we have to pay for it again. 2. We will be glad to finally get a feasibility study done. We expect this to be an independent, objective study that will be shared openly with us, in a timely manner. 3. Pertaining to the signing of a petition for reconsideration of reconstruction, I feel this is an insult to the open process of government. It seems to be one more hoop to jump through to get what we need and deserve. This overtly looks like a slap on the wrist for opposing what the Staff recommends! Is this really the impression you want to leave? It is clear that the Ridge Road residents want some action. Let's just get on with our objective! It was our original hope to be 'resurfaced' when the crews were in the neighborhood in 2010. This looks to no longer be a possibility. We will now look forward to working closely with the Engineering Dept., working diligently to get the best results for our road; maintaining its aesthetic integrity, maintaining it's current width and incurring minimal expense to the property owners. We expect the city to improve its communications with us and all the citizens that are working hard to make Edina a better place to live. Thank you Betsy Robinson Y Ce: To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 16, 2010 Subject: Correspondence Info /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VII. A. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance I I Discussion Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. Susan Howl ubject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 RECEIVED Subject: Ridge Road repairs City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 FEB 16 2010 1 am responding to the announcement that a decision will be made tonight in response to a letter sent on behalf of the residents of Ridge Road (presented by Betsy Robinson). As I understand, the recommendations that will be presented to the council are as follows: Recommendation; There are two options the City Council may take based on the Community Comment by Betsy Robinson at the January 15 City Council Meeting, these are: 1. Request the Ridge Road Residents file a petition to have the City prepare a feasibility Study to reconstruct Ridge Road for the 2011 reconstruction season. 2. Request engineering to prepare feasibility study this fall to reconstruct the roadway for the 2011 reconstruction season. . I do not believe that any of the residents of Ridge Road are requesting a full feasibility study or a reconstruction of the street that could possibly involve widening, curb and gutters or new sewers. This is not what the residents have requested in the letter provided by Betsy on our behalf, rather we have requested that the surface of the road be repaired properly with a mill and overlay process to eliminate the many cracks, potholes, and pavement imperfections that are now causing dangerous driving and walking conditions. Sincerely, Perry Witkin 5112 Ridge Road Edina, MN 55436 612 - 369 -6580 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 RECEIVED Subject: Fwd: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 FEB 16 Al Anne Rutledge and Anne Charity, 5116 Ridge Road, Edina, MN 953- 935 -4845: We totally agree with Mr Witkin's response. Our January 15th letter does not request a feasibility study or reconstruction. We requested our road be repaired properly with a mill and overlay to eliminate damage that has occurred and is dangerous for walking, riding, biking, running, and driving. Susan Howl ubject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 From: Joe McErlane [ mailto :joemcerlanesr @hotmail.com] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:44 PM FEB 161010 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: Ridge Road repairs - City Counsel meeting February 16, 2010 We concur with Anne Rutledge, Anne Charity and Perry Witkin re: mill and overlay repair to Ridge Road. Joseph and Florence Mcerlane, 5120 Ridge Road. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Human Rights Commission recommendations RECEIVED FEB 161010 Subject: Human Rights Commission recommendations To the Council: I applaud the recommendations of the Human Rights Commission to create a domestic partnership registry and institute other equal benefits reforms. I am a lesbian living in Edina and I am not always comfortable being open about my sexual orientation in this community. It would be a big step forward for the city to move forward with these recommendations, and it would bring me closer to having equal rights as a lesbian. It would make me even more proud to be an Edinan. Eleanor Wagner, 5529 Vernon Ave. South, Edina, MN 55436; 952 - 922 -7703 Susan Howl ubject: FW: Watershed Rules To: Mayors of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Dear Fellow Mayors, RECEIVED FEB 16 2010 Most of you are aware of the changes being proposed by the MCWD that affect your city and residents. You have also become aware of the impact it will make to your city in the form of loss of zoning authority, increased costs to the cities, and reduced effectiveness of shoreline erosion. Most cities in the Watershed have submitted letters outlining their opposition to all or part of these rule changes. I thank you for your interest and reaction to these rules that will have minimal or even reduced effect, but come at a much higher cost than exist today. Hennepin County has also taken the position that many of these changes are too burdensome and not necessary. Even the Minneapolis Parks Board is opposed to some of the rule changes. As you may be aware, the County Board is the appointing authority of the Board of Managers to the Watershed. Their opposition is very meaningful and can have great impact on these rules, as can the cities in the District. It has been suggested that the Mayors or city staff of each city should write a very short letter to their respective County Commissioner expressing their opposition to these rules. It doesnt have to go into detail or point by point. A simple letter or email expressing your opposition is all that is necessary. It will help them form their position now, and in the future. Just for the record, the City of Mound is a very good steward of the lake. In fact, we received the Watershed Hero Award for governmental bodies from the MCWD last year. But we feel they are going way overboard. They will not improve the water quality by the proposed methods but only create more costs. Therefore, the position of the City of Mound.is in opposition to any of the proposed changes. We feel that there methods to improve water quality that are more effective it less burdonsome at the same time. I thank you for your interest and urge you to write a short email or letter to your County Commissioner. I also recommend that you watch the Watershed website for the public hearings that will be scheduled on Rules D and F. Please have someone attend these hearings from your city to further voice your opposition to these rule changes. Most Respectfully, Mark Hanus Mound Mayor Susan Howl Subject: FW: domestic partnership recommendation Subject: domestic partnership recommendation RECEIVE[) To Council Members, FEB 16 mo Ms. Joni Bennett Ms. Mary Brindle Mr. Scot Housh Ms. Ann Swenson As you know, the Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission recently sent a package of recommendations to the Edina City Council advocating the creation of a domestic partnership registry and other equal- benefits reforms. I encourage you to support an ordinance that would positively affect gay and lesbian couples in the city of Edina. Thank you, Rev. Tyler Christiansen 6117 Chowen Ave S. Edina, MN 55410 Susan Howl ubject: FW: City Council Question RECEIVED Hello, FEB 161010 I don't live in Edina, but I work in Edina. I recently came across some information that the City Council is going to review a proposal about Domestic Partnership Registry in Edina. I have some strong opinions about Domestic Partner Registries and benefits, and I would like to share how my company has made a difference in so many people's lives. Is the City Council interested in hearing the opinions of people who work in Edina, or just those who live in Edina? Thank you for your time, Kelly Fitzgerald Kelly M. Fitzgerald Environmental, Health, and Safety Delivery Technician FilmTec Corporation Dow Water & Process Solutions 5400 Dewey Hill Road Edina, MN 55439 Office: 952- 897 -4259 Cell: 612 - 559 -0375 Susan Howl Subject: FW: 1-494 and Highway 169 RECEIVED Subject: I -494 and Highway 169 FEB 16 1010 I was told two years ago that the 3 cities would compromise and give on those local road changes to get the main objective done sooner than later. I just reviewed the two designs ( "performance" and policy design) for the removal of the stop lights at 169 and 1 -494. The majority of the costs are still for local access roads and bridges. It still appears we are bogged down in numerous costs associated with local wants for both designs. The Feds want the policy design that would allow traffic to flow in all directions between 169 and 1494. The MNDOT says that we could save 30 to 40 million if we only provided flow for six directions rather than 8. Why the Feds won't bend is beyond me since we have exception all over the Metro area. Take out all of the local wants and wishes and we could have the policy design and federal funding soon with significant savings. Otherwise we will continue to watch cars run red lights and t -bone other cars and rear end cars on 1 -494 and 169. How many of these accidents have resulted in lose of life (I remember the child restraint on the shoulder of 1 -494 in which the baby died) and life changing injuries. How much noise and air pollution is generated by stopping and accelerating? Gregg Harcus 9822 Belmont Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55347 1 RECEIVED Susan Howl FEB 16 2010 Mayor Rybak on Governor's Budget: Communities to Bail out Pawlenty for Inability to Structurally Balance Budget Homeowners across Minnesota will pay more for fewer basics February 15, 2010 (MINNEAPOLIS) - Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak made the following statement in reaction to Governor Tim Pawlenty's proposal to cut $118 million in Local Government Aid to communities across Minnesota. "Homeowners and business owners across Minnesota are once again being asked to bail out the governor, who has proven incapable of getting the state's budget under control. For eight years the state's fiscal situation has gone from bad to worse — and yet communities large and small across Minnesota have managed to structurally balance their budgets. "Despite these communities' hard work, if the governor's budget becomes law, all over Minnesota people will pay more property taxes — while having to drive over unrepaired roads and bridges and having fewer police and firefighters to rely on to keep us safe. "In tough times everyone has to do their share — but local communities have already done more than their share. As just one example, during the time the governor and I have been in office, state spending on his watch has risen 1.2 percent while city spending on my watch has risen one percent. We have cut costs, reformed government and forged new partnerships to create jobs, nurture our youth and keep people safe. "The governor should take responsibility for his inability to do the same and stop passing the buck onto homeowners. "In the long term, we should work in partnership with mayors, elected officials and community leaders around our state to restructure local government inMinnesota — but Governor Pawlenty's budget today doesn't do that. Instead, the governor has chosen to lob a political grenade while passing off his longstanding problems onto local communities and taxpayers." Quick facts about Local Government Aid to'Minneapolis: • Even before today's proposal, LGA to Minneapolis has been cut 42 %, or $290 million, since 2003. • Since 2003, property taxes have gone from comprising 29% of the City's revenue to 47% of the City's revenue. • Since 2003, state aids have gone from comprising 40% of the City's revenue to 19% of the City's revenue. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Ridge Road Street Project Subject: Ridge Road Street Project RECEIVED FEB 14 2010 My husband and I have lived at 5025 Ridge Road for 13 years. We have had major water damage from rain water from Ridge Road going down our driveway which had water running down the northside of our home like a stream. This water went into our foundation which we have had to spend thousands of dollars to redirect the street water and redo our landscape. We are hoping that you vote for option 2 tonight. We really need our road fixed but we don't want to have it done without the neighbors and city working this out together. We all pay top taxes and would appreciate making this a win win for Edina as well as the residents of Ridge Road. Please vote for option 2. Thanks you for helping our Ridge Road. Chuck and Corky Carlsen Susan Howl )ubject: FW: ridge road repairs RECEIVEL) FEB 1 1010 Subject: FW: ridge road repairs > To City Council Members and Honorable Mayor Jim Hovland > I, bean bovolis, of 5009 Ridge Road, Edina, MN am simply requesting a repair to our street not a complete reconstruction. I know from my architectural and engineering background that a reconstruction may be the most prudent way for a long term solution. However, given the economic situation that we, and many of our neighbors, find ourselves in we need to create a solution that addresses repairs only and not a solution that creates an assessment. Given the Governors budget proposal, our property taxes are only guaranteed to escalate. This development along with a street reconstruction property tax assesment makes it impossable to stay in our homes. I am willing to work with our City to find a solution that creates minimal expense to the City and avoids a street assessment. Thank you for your consideration. > Sincerely, > bean bovolis Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attention City Council Members Subject: Ridge Road Dear Council Members; RECEIVED FEB 16 2010 It has come to my attention that the issue of Ridge Road repair request is to be considered tonight at the Council meeting. Had Council member, Jon! Bennett, not emailed me with this information our neighborhood would not have known this fact. It was stated at the Council meeting after our presentation that Staff would notify Betsy Robinson (designated neighborhood contact) with the date our issue would be heard regarding this matter. They did not! Adding to the lack of communication. by the city, once finding the meeting's agenda for tonight and trying to open the Staff Report to see the Engineering Department's recommendations the information was not accessible. Communication is paramount to good governance. I had expected better from Edina! As to the recommendations made by the Engineering Dept. which I finally got this morning, the following are my thoughts: 1. No mention or consideration was given to the present (2010) requests made at the last meeting. Engineering provided historical information with no substantiation for a reconstruction (other than in 2004 they thought it needed to be done). Show us the facts! This seemed to be related to past drainage problems experienced on the easterly side. Did they not hear the fact that the owners of those properties have fixed these problems at their own expense, a problem the city would not help resolve for 20+ years? Now the city wants to come in and fix something that is already fixed and we have to pay for it again: 2. We will be glad to finally get a feasibility study done. We expect this to be an independent, objective study that will be shared openly with us, in a timely manner. 3. Pertaining to the signing of a petition for reconsideration of reconstruction, I feel this is an insult to the open process of government. It seems to be one more hoop to jump through to get what we need and deserve. This overtly looks like a slap on the wrist for opposing what the Staff recommends! Is this really the impression you want to leave? It is clear that the Ridge Road residents want some action. Let's just get on with our objective! It was our original hope to be 'resurfaced' when the crews were in the neighborhood in 2010. This looks to no longer be a possibility. We will now look forward to working closely with the Engineering Dept., working diligently to get the best results for our road; maintaining its aesthetic integrity, maintaining it's current width and incurring minimal expense to the property owners. We expect the city to improve its communications with us and all the citizens that are working hard to make Edina a better place to live. Thank you Betsy Robinson Susan Howl Subject: FW: 1-494 & US 169 attachments: US 169 at 1-494 (JG 2- 12- 08).ppt Subject: I -494 & US 169 Mayor James Hovland, I have a proposal that I wanted to make the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition aware of. Until we can get the funding necessary to rebuild the interchange in accordance with the applicable design standards, I propose capping the access roads with cul -de -sacs and removing the lights for a much more reasonable cost and to save millions in lost productivity and energy. I have a attached a PowerPoint pitch that better explains what 1 propose. MNDOT can spend a moderate sum of money doing this now and landscape it enough to minimize the impact to adjacent property owners. If members of the coalition wish to speak with me about this proposal, I am more than willing to do so. I have a background in geography, urban planning and the law. I hope to hear from you soon. Sincerely, Jeff Goldy T 952 440 6640 C 952 738 2499 ieff.goldyAearthlink.net It J ' 1 , . Notes., � a .;r (ter. i:.. t.�,. y �j,fii ,� `yam-. • kk , y O ILl! s r• i � t JF 1 A A A i=% 1 1C% -OV a_7f1A7 it nnicaaff. wF. WE nlww p • �� a r , J•r 4� . :A.. �� .1 !zla ° • Eliminate the Traffic Lights @ the Interchange of 1 -494 & US 169 • Save Rush Hour Commuters Several Minutes as They Navigate the r I-nterchange • Save Lives. by Reducing the'Risk of Accidents at These Traffic. Lights — Accidents Common at These Lights — Especially on the Southbound Lanes on US 169 at the Northern Set of Lights • Reconfigure the Related Intersections & Rumps in- an Affordable Manner - Don't Wait Until the Interchange Is Rebuilt • Grant Access to Capped or Rerouted Surface Streets Via. Other Surface Streets & Interstate / Highway Exits Notes 1. Cap & create a cul -de -sac for Town Line Avenue / West 78th Street Remove traffic lights — Access from Prairie Center Drive Access from US 169 southbound would interfere with merging traffic from 1 -494 eastbound to US 169 southbound — Access from Town Line Avenue to US 169 southbound might interfere with merging traffic'frorn 1 -494 2. Cap & create a cul -de -sac for Hig'hwood Drive — Access from Bush. Lake Road Access from US 169 northbound to via ramp_ onto 1 -494 eastbound possible 3. Realign ramp at the corner & lengthen merge lane past old intersection to the south Remove traffic lights Terminate Left turns from 1 -494 eastbound to US 169 northbound Redirect traffic seeking access to US 169 northbound from 1 -494 east bound with signage at the interchange of 1 -494 & US 212 / MN 5 t- Not 4. Realign ramp at the corner & lengthen off -ramp lane to old intersection to the south 5. Disconnect access from West 78th onto the ramp. from 1 -494 Ensure that traffic flow from West 78th doesn't interfere with people leaving -1-494 eastbound to go to US 169 southbound 6. Cap & create a corner only for Viking Drive & Washington. Avenue — Access from Valley View Road via Washington Avenue or Prairie Center Drive Access from US 169. southbound to the ramp onto 1 -494 westbound possible 7. Realign ramp at the corner & lengthen off -ramp lane northward — Remove traffic lights 8. Realign ramp at the corner & lengthen merge lane northward Remove traffic lights — Terminate Left turns from 1 -494 westbound to US 169 southbound 1 • o_. r jib It Notes Contd 9. Cap & :create a curve only for West 78th & frontage road — Access from Valley View Road via frontage road — Access from West 78th westbound. to the ramp onto US 169 northbound possible but might. interfere with merging traffic from 1 -494 westbound onto US 169 northbound 10. Cap & create a corner- at -Marth Road / frontage road & Friendship Village Road — Could leave as configured, but- may require some realignment as part of realigning the ramp from US 169 northbound to 1 -494 eastbound 4 0� a, y� U� �� • f 1C�liA7xP-T� // ,aeB 2009 ACCOMPLISHMENTS EDINA ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS The Engineering Department and Public Works has once again finished another very successful year of projects. Everyone throughout the City organization should be proud of the improvements that we have made to the quality of life for the citizens of Edina. This includes not only people who design and inspect these projects but also the people who provide internal support, from our administrative, financial, assessing, enforcement (police dispatch to traffic control), and all the staff in Public Works. General Public Works Proiects: The Public Works Department used the following materials to perform a variety of maintenance through -out the city: • 9500 tons of asphalt blacktop mix • 43,000 gallons of road oil, including sealcoating and patching oil • 640 cubic yards of concrete • $22,000 on timber and stone materials and repairs • $11,000 of sweeping broom stock • 5000 tons of winter de -icing materials • $5,000 on parking ramp materials and repairs • 1400 tons of sealcoat chips • $40,000 on replacement street signs and posts • 50th and France area: numerous repairs to pavers, signs, trees, and light poles. • Over 2,000 ton of asphalt to repair potholes. • 970 gallons of traffic marking paint. Engineering projects are as follows: NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS AND UTILTITIES The projects listed below were all initiated by the Engineering and Utility Departments as part of the City's street reconstruction program and Capital Improvement Program to update aging infrastructure and address several issues including drainage problems and sanitary sewer repairs. The streets and public utilities were constructed in the early 1950's and 1960's, with the exception of the Country Club Neighborhood. Country Club District - Phase II Engineer's Estimate: $19,639,000 (Phase 1 & II) Due to the size of this neighborhood, the project was scheduled over a two -year period (2008 -2009) in two phases. With the completion of Phase II this past fall, the entire project is now complete. Residents were encouraged to replace their sanitary sewer and water main pipes, with emphasis on their sanitary sewer pipe because they are responsible for the entire pipe from the house to the middle of the street. Replacing them during the current reconstruction prevent cuts in the new roadway in the near future. Approximately 85% of residents replaced their sanitary sewer and the City's contractor replaced the remaining 15% within the City's right -of -way. Project communication with residents included weekly City Extra email, doorknob hangers as needed, bi- weekly residents' meeting at Utley Park, and a bulletin board in the park for project updates. The bi- weekly residents' meeting at Utley Park was eventually discontinued due to non - participation. Before New Ornamental Streetlight 0i After New Brick Paver Crosswalks Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Engineer's Estimate: $1,090,305.25 Low Bid: $676,537.72 The Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Road and Utility Improvement Project included Dundee Road, Mirror Lakes Drive and Chantrey Road. Improvements included: • Removal of the old bituminous and replacement with new aggregate base material and bituminous pavement. • Constructed new concrete curb and gutter in areas where utility upgrades were done and also the north end of Dundee Road (majority of the neighborhood already had curb and gutter). • Upgraded the storm sewer system by adding catch basins and improved storm water treatment structures. • Upgraded fire hydrants to City standards. • Upgraded the sanitary sewer on Mirror Lakes Drive and made spot repairs throughout the rest of the neighborhood. • Installed sump pump drains. Before South Garden Estates Neighborhood Engineer's Estimate: $983,553.25 Low Bid: $696,731.40 After The South Garden Estates Neighborhood Road and Utility Improvement Project included West Shore Drive, Claremore Court, Belvidere Lane, Andover Road, Wooddale Avenue and Dunham Drive. Improvements included: • Removal of the old bituminous and replacement with new aggregate base material and bituminous pavement. • Constructed new concrete curb and gutter throughout the entire neighborhood. • Upgraded the storm sewer system by adding catch basins and improved storm water treatment structures. • Upgraded fire hydrants to City standards. • Spot repaired sanitary sewer throughout the entire neighborhood. • Installed sump pump drains. 3 Before After St. John's Park Neighborhood Engineer's Estimate: $3,000,350.00 Low Bid: $1,586,586.38 The St. John's Park Neighborhood Project included all the streets bounded by West 59`h Street to the north, Valley View Road to the south, Concord Avenue to the west, and Wooddale Avenue to the east. Improvement included: • Spot repairs to sanitary sewer trunk pipes • Storm sewer trunk pipe extensions and reconstruction to increase capacity • Drain tile installation to discharge sump pumps into storm sewer trunk pipes • New curb and gutter in places were there were none and spot repairs to existing • Reconstruction bituminous pavement • Replace existing fire hydrants with new City standard hydrants n 4 2009 Mill and Overlay Engineer's Estimate: $372,369.00 Low Bid: $262,409.00 Blake Road, from Vernon Avenue to Interlachen Blvd was milled and overlaid with new asphalt. This method of repair is generally used to prolong the live of the road another 5 -10 years before having to do a full reconstruction. This project was funded by Municipal State Aid funds. Other significant upgrades included: • Replaced two worn (painted) crosswalks with DuraTherm crosswalks. The crosswalks are made with thermoplastic material that is inlaid into imprinted asphalt that is installed flush with the road surface. As a result it is extremely resistant to wear caused by traffic and is very snowplow friendly. Additionally, the diagonal and longitudinal white lines provide enhanced visibility of a marked crosswalk for oncoming traffic making it safer for pedestrians. • Striped two 5 -feet bike lanes to integrate the Bike Edina Task Force's plan as roadways are upgraded. After 67 After West 70th and Metro Blvd Mill and Overlay Engineer's Estimate: $187,404.00 Low Bid: $179,155.62 This project included a mill and overlay and lane modifications to the intersection of West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard. A right turn lane from west bound West 70tH Street to west bound West 70th Street was added along with a left turn lane from north bound Metro Boulevard to west bound West 701h Street. The existing signal system was upgraded to accommodate the new turn lanes and emergency vehicle preemption was added. The pedestrian crossing was replaced with DuraTherm pavement markings for better visibility and the pedestrian ramps were upgraded to comply with the American Disability Act standards. Before Well No. 13 Rehabilitation 6721 2" Street Engineer's Estimate: $150,000.00 Low Bid: $81,241.00 After Well No. 13 was completely overhaul and renovated, including rehabilitation of the pump. Funds were allocated in the 2009 Capital Improvement Plan for this project at $150,000.00. nJ r SIDEWALKS West Frontage Road Sidewalk — Phase II Engineer's Estimate: $154,519.50 Low Bid: $128,788.00 This is the second phase of sidewalk construction along the westerly side of TH100 West Frontage Road. A 6 -foot wide bituminous sidewalk from Normandale Court to Benton Avenue and a 5 -foot concrete sidewalk to Eastview Drive were constructed. This project was in the 2008 -2012 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The funding came from construction funds and Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds. Approximately $96,000 was paid for using MSA funds. 'f Before Tracy Avenue Sidewalk (Countryside School) Engineer's Estimate: $13,942.25 Low Bid: $8,962.00 This sidewalk was petitioned by the School District to complete an unfinished segment to the east of Countryside Elementary School on Tracy Avenue. We also used this opportunity to rebuild the sidewalk pedestrian ramp to meet the American with Disability Act specifications and added an additional pedestrian ramp. The sidewalk was curved to avoid removal of an electrical pole which would have increased the cost substantially. efore ♦ After I 7 OTHER Fred Richards Golf Course Pond Dredging (Hole 9) Low Bid: $25,250.00 This pond was dredged to remove sediment build -up due to storm sewer discharges and general erosion. The work was done during the winter season to minimize impacts to areas adjacent to the site. Funding was from the 2008 Capital Improvement Program Storm Water Utility Fund. $60,000 is generally appropriated annually for pond dredging projects. This was a carry -over from 2008. Before Parking Lots and Pathway Improvements Engineer's Estimate: $346,501.25 Low Bid: $319,421.00 After The Bredesen Park pathway, Edinborough Park entryway and sidewalk, Braemar Golf Course and Highlands Park parking lots were repaired. Bredesen Pathway ♦ Before After Edinborough Park ♦ Before After I Projects Assessed) in 2009 The following projects were assessed: BA -342 Highlands Neighborhood Reconstruction Pending Assessment: $15,210.55 Levied Assessment: "$11,787.89 S -0.92 Doncaster Sidewalk Pending Assessment: $179.80 :Levied Assessment: $196.31 BA -345 Woodland Circle & Lane Neighborhood Reconstruction Pending Assessment: $14,347.22 Levied Assessment: $13,491.99 BA -352 Wood End Drive Neighborhood Reconstruction Pending Assessment: $10,000.00 Levied Assessment: $9,335,05 S -100 Halifax Avenue. Sidewalk (East Side) Pending Assessment: $1,506.25 Levied Assessment: $1,486.83 S -1 OOA Halifax Avenue Sidewalk (West Side) Pending Assessment: $199.23 Levied Assessment: $128.09 9 New Public Works Building 7450 Metro Boulevard Renovation of the new Public Works Building began in May and work is progressing steadily. This new building will be home to the Public Works, Engineering and Park Maintenance Departments. These departments are currently operating out of three separate buildings. The expected completion date is July 2010. 10 Edina Public Art Committee- MINUTES- 110712010 Mayor's. Conference Room, Edina City Hall 4pm Present: Brad Benn, Dick Crockett, Rick Fesler, Amy Kerber Linda Kieffer, Bill McCabe, Lois Ring and Anne Spooner. 9th Grade Student Sara, Ruth Valgemae. Bernice Amacher absent. December 3, 2009 MINUTES approved. WELCOME TO RUTH VALGEMAE Ruth Valgemae introduced herself and shared her back ground; she is a former Edina Art Center Board Member for 9 years, artist and art history major, volunteer and Edina Resident. CONTINUING BUSINESS Brad Benn reported mailing a new 2010 Call to Sculptors letter. Approximately 135 individuals and 50 Institutions were sent this letter. Dick Crockett and Amy Kerber reported continuing efforts to contact individual philanthropists for possible donations. Brad Benn reported that Target just received their tax ID and he will continue to work toward the application deadline of April 2010. A draft of the application request letter was reviewed. Dick Crockett reported that no grant decision had yet been made regarding the $10,000 portion of the late Peg McNally's gift to the Edina Community Foundation that ECF has designated for a community program in her honor. Given her interest in art, one possibility is the purchase of a work of art for the City, perhaps on the Promenade. None of this year's sculptures appear to be in that price range, so Dick suggested that there might be an appropriate sculpture in the 2010 -11 exhibition. He also indicated that EPAC. endorsement of a specific work would be an important factor in any future grant decision to use the money for purchase of public art. Amy Kerber presented a document containing fund raising ideas from an interested party. Discussion ensued about these suggestions. Lois Ring suggested that the City Officials be contacted and hopefully support and share fund raising ideas. Ideas of interest include selling paving blocks that could be sold and imprinted with the donor's name. Ruth Valgemae commented that partnering with the Garden Club may be a way to help promote awareness of the sculptures. Large containers with plantings placed temporarily near each sculpture was suggested. Dick Crockett reported no new donations. In order to promote EPAC, he also _ suggested that EPAC piggyback onto other events such as summer happenings at Centennial Lakes Park. Lois Ring reported a discussion with Arrie Larsen Manti Chamber of Commerce President re taking guests at the Taste of Edina from the Centrum on a tour of the Sculpture Exhibit of the Promenade by cart. Arrie liked the idea but decided against it as alcohol is served at the event. Arrie agreed the Promenade brochures could be available at their table during the event. Marketing- Promotion - Lois Ring presented the Press Release to be sent out by the City regarding the Call for Sculptors for 2010. It was approved with changes in dates. She also reported sending the announcement to Edina Magazine, Star Tribune and the Sun Current. NEW BUSINESS Bill McCabe presented a schematic drawing of the Greer Garden and reported on the status of the project at Edina Art Center. $20,000 will go toward the Greer Garden and another $10,000 is needed to complete it. The Edina Garden Club is donating plantings and the Centrum is also splitting some existing plants and donating to the garden. Bill McCabe requested that EPAC suggest artists who could possible create a fence to be placed in the garden area. It will be woven with natural materials and will function as an art piece, could possibly be used to mount student work, ideally, 4 -6 ft tall, 30 feet long. OTHER Rick Fesler confirmed that he will be sending letters to several potential donors and then arrange one -on -one meetings. Meeting adjourned at 5:23pm. Minutes taken by Anne Spooner Next meeting will be Feb 4 @ 4pm Statewide Health Improvement Program MINNESOTA'S February 2010 VISION Better State of Health prMakin health living easier tmmm"iProganz SHIP where you live, work and play ® Community Tobacco Reduce the harm of secondhand smoke by implementing and strengthening tobacco -free policies in parks and other recreational settings. Physical Activity • Nutrition Give everyone in the community more opportunities for physical activity by adding biking and walking space. Support street designs that accommodate walking and biking. Assist each city in suitable placement of bike racks. Collaborate with Hennepin County to implement a county- wide communication plan that promotes active living. Help children adopt healthy eating habits and be more active through training, resources and guidance to childcare and preschool staff. Make it easier for all community members to obtain fresh fruits and vegetables through policies, practices and environmental changes. Establish a farmers market in Edina. Develop a satellite farmers market in Richfield. Study barriers to the Bloomington farmers market and improve access for all residents. Explore other sources of fresh produce such as community gardens. Bloomington* Edina Statewide Health Improvement Program ■ Schools Physical Activity • Nutrition Help students adopt healthy eating habits and increase activity by implementing nutrition and activity policies and practices in schools. Encourage and support biking and walking to school. ■ Worksites Physical Activity Provide opportunities for adults to get more physical activity at work. ■Healthcare Tobacco • Physical Activity • Nutrition Partner with healthcare clinics and providers to implement guidelines that prevent obesity and chronic disease risk factors. Assist clinics to connect with and create a referral network of community resources. The Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), an integral part of Minnesota's nation - leading 2008 health reform law, strives to help Minnesotans lead longer, healthier lives by preventing the chronic disease risk factors of tobacco use and exposure, poor nutrition and physical inactivity. For more information, visit http: / /www. health .state.mn.us /heaIthreform /ship. G CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC HEALTH 1900 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 952 - 563 -8900 WW W.CI.BLOOMINGTON.MN.US MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, January 12,2010,7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Chris Rofidal, Lou Blemaster, Arlene Forrest, Connie Fukuda, Bob Kojetin, Jean Rehkamp Larson, Bob Schwartzbauer, Joel Stegner and Elizabeth Montgomery STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the December 8, 2009, meeting were filed as submitted. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificate of Appropriateness A. H -10-01 4505 Arden Avenue, Edina, MN Remove home's heritage resource classification to enable demolition of home and construction of a new home. Staff Presentation Planner Repya explained that the Country Club District Plan of Treatment, as revised in 2008, stipulates that houses which the HPB determines to be heritage preservation resources will be protected against teardowns "unless the applicant can show that the subject property is not a heritage preservation resource, or no longer contributes to the historical significance of the District because its historic integrity has been compromised by deterioration, damage or by inappropriate additions or alterations." For planning purposes, a house in the Country Club District is considered to be a heritage preservation resource if (a) it was built during the district's period of historical significance (1924 -1944) and (b) it embodies the distinctive architectural features that characterize one or more of the "period revival" styles (Colonial, Tudor, etc.). Planner Repya reported that the subject property at 4505 Arden Avenue is located on the east side of the 4500 block of Arden Avenue. The existing home is a Tudor style constructed in 1926, and thus categorized a heritage resource which precludes the home from being torn down. Tim and Michele Pronley have entered into a purchase agreement for the property with the intention of demolishing the home and building a new home that meets the design review guidelines in the Country Club District's Plan of Treatment. HPB Minutes January 12, 2010 Page 2 of 9 Planner Repya reminded the Board that at the November HPB meeting, Scott Busyn of Great Neighborhood Homes represented the Pronleys in requesting opinions from the Board as to the likelihood the home could be reclassified a non - historic resource and hence qualify for demolition. At that time, Mr. Busyn provided photographic evidence supporting his contention that the home at 4505 Arden Avenue no longer contributes to the historical significance of the Country Club District because its historic integrity has been compromised by deterioration, damage, and inappropriate additions and /or alterations. Once Mr. Busyn concluded his presentation, members of the Heritage Preservation Board shared their opinions. The general consensus of the group was that if the Pronleys chose to pursue declassifying the home a heritage resource they would have to make a very strong case that the home suffers from deterioration, damage, and /or inappropriate additions or alterations that cannot be rehabilitated. The Board stressed that information provided should be supported by the technical evaluation of a registered architect or engineer. Planner Repya pointed out in his letter to the HPB dated November 9, 2009; Mr. Busyn stated that the subject property "no longer contributes to the historical significance of the Country Club District because its historic integrity has been compromised by deterioration, damage, and by inappropriate additions or alterations." In his opinion, these defects have rendered the existing home "unsafe and uninhabitable" and therefore unworthy of preservation. Mr. Busyn has now provided 2 extensive reports of the subject home. The first, by Building Environmental Management, Corp. evaluated the home with respect to mold and moisture. The second report by structural engineer and architect Jared Larson provided an evaluation of his visual inspection of the home, including a list of the existing deficiencies and building code violations found in both the interior and the exterior of the home. Both reports were presented to support Mr. Busyn's contention that the existing house should be demolished. In an evaluation of the reports, Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel observed that missing from both assessments of the property was consideration of the subject property's location within a designated heritage preservation district. Also, neither report referenced the relevant historic preservation standards or heritage resource management practices. Much of the information presented related to the condition of the interior of the house which would be irrelevant when assessing its historic integrity. Mr. Vogel also pointed out that regarding the exterior conditions of the home, the observations and recommendations were presented out of context, having little bearing on the question of whether or not the house possesses historic integrity. Edina's chief building official, Steve Kirchman reviewed the reports provided by Mr. Busyn and determined that while there are numerous components of the dwelling requiring repair or replacement, that would not be unusual for a home built in the 1920's. He pointed out that while rehabilitation of the home would require demolition of a great deal of that which currently exists, it is possible. 'r HPB Minutes jet nuary 12, 2010 page 3 of 9 Mr. Kirchman added that the architect's report raised concern as to the structural integrity of the foundation, however no evidence was provided relative to the extent of the foundation's deterioration. Furthermore, Mr. Kirchman pointed out that most residential dwelling foundations are over - designed and a limited amount of deterioration is not structurally significant. Lastly, Mr. Kirchman observed that he did not believe that the reports provided evidence to render a judgment that the home is unsafe or uninhabitable. RECOMMENDATION & FINDINGS: Planner Repya concluded that taking into consideration the property reports provided by the applicant; the evaluation by Steve Kirchman, Edina's Chief Building Inspector; and the recommendation from Robert Vogel, the Board's Heritage Preservation Consultant, Staff recommends denial of the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove the heritage resource classification of the home at 4505 Arden Avenue. Findings supporting the recommendation include: 1. The subject property is a heritage preservation resource and contributes to the historical significance of the Country Club District. 2. Built in 1926, the core of the house is a representative example of the Tudor Revival style homes constructed in the District during its period of historical significance (1924- 1944). The street facade is preserved intact, despite some deterioration caused by weathering and apparent deferred maintenance. 3. The City's chief building official reviewed the submitted reports and opined in his memos dated January 6, 2010 and January 11, 2010 that based on information in the reports the home at 4505 Arden Avenue could be rehabilitated, and is "safe and habitable ". 4. The structural additions made to the house in 1938 and 1948 are architecturally incompatible with the Tudor style fagade, but have not destroyed the distinguishing original qualities and historic character of the property. Structural additions are a common feature of historic homes in the Country Club District and document the history of the neighborhood and individual properties. In this case, although the additions are over fifty years old, they lack architectural distinction and have no preservation value in their own right. 5. The physical condition of the core of the house makes it a good candidate for preservation. The original street facade has survived largely intact and the visual impact of the inappropriate structural additions (located on the rear) is reversible. 6. The deteriorated condition of some of the property's historic character - defining exterior features does not justify demolition. The preferred treatment is rehabilitation, encompassing repair or replacement of the deteriorated features, construction of an architecturally appropriate rear addition and garage, and abatement of serious building code problems. Compliance with modern energy efficiency, drainage, and accessibility standards should not endanger the architectural integrity of the facade and modifications to the historic appearance of the house from the street should be minimal. HPB Minutes January 12, 2010 Page 4 of 9 7. The owners of 4505 Arden Avenue could rehabilitate the core section of the historic house. This may result in demolition of the 2 -story addition and attached garage, which would require a Certificate of Appropriateness; the new construction would need to meet the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation and follow the design review guidelines in the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. A Certificate of Appropriateness would not be required for work that would not result in the removal of more than 50% of the surface area of all exterior walls or the principal roof. The preferred preservation treatment for the house at 4505 Arden Avenue is rehabilitation, which is also the recommended treatment strategy for the Country Club District as a whole. Rehabilitation is the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a heritage preservation resource through repairs, alterations, and /or additions, while preserving those portions or features which convey the property's historical, cultural and architectural values. The underlying reason for rehabilitating rather than tearing down the house is the recognition that the older homes give the Country Club District its special character and cultural depth. Once a heritage resource is demolished, it cannot be replaced, and architecturally compatible new homes are not an appropriate substitute for preserved historic homes, regardless of how attractive they look to the modern eye. In more utilitarian terms, rehabilitation of older homes also saves energy and raw materials, to say nothing of time and money, over new construction. Applicant Presentation Mr. Busyn thanked everyone for attending the meeting and told the Board in his opinion the subject home is in the worse condition he's seen. Mr. Busyn stated over the years the home has suffered tremendous deterioration and damage. Mr. Busyn also pointed out the inappropriateness of the additions and "other" alterations to the home. Mr. Busyn delivered a power point presentation cataloging the deterioration to the home. Mr. Busyn pointed out the following issues found with the house: • Widespread exterior and interior water damage • Mold growth contamination • Structural deterioration and failure • Overall deterioration of exterior and interior finishes. • Roof failure • Multiple code violations to include a stairway that is too narrow, no handrail, unsafe landings, no fire protection between garage and home, exposed electrical, exposed asbestos • Chimney deterioration. The chimney should be removed and replaced. • Settling • Too many dogs in the home • Mice Mr. Busyn stated these deficiencies have been confirmed and documented by licensed architects /engineers and residential environmental health experts. Mr. Busyn further HPB Minutes January 12, 2010 page 5 of 9 explained that a thermal imaging camera was used to detect moisture intrusion inside the walls. Continuing, Mr. Busyn clarified that Mr. and Mrs. Pronley do not own the property; they are the applicant and have entered into a Purchase Agreement with the home's Trustees. Mr. Busyn said the Pronleys are not against historic preservation, they believe in it. Mr. Busyn referred to the Plan of Treatment and noted that it states the City promotes voluntary compliance with historic preservation as long as it is possible to make an efficient, contemporary use of older homes. Mr. Busyn alleged that this isn't possible with 4505 Arden Avenue. He added that the property has suffered so badly from deferred maintenance that it has gone past the tipping point. Mr. Busyn said a reasonable person would allow the property owners to have the choice to either rehabilitate the home or raze the home and replace the home with a new home. Mr. Busyn asked the Board for their support. Public Comment Carol Hancock, 4503 Arden Avenue, addressed the Board and pointed out that in the Country Club District there are numerous homes with additions to the original house. She said in her opinion the "non- historic" additions of the subject house could be removed and the core of the original house preserved. Continuing, Ms. Hancock referred to Mr. Busyn's comments on mold found in the house and asked if the mold growth had been documented. Ms. Hancock commented on the thermal photos presented of the interior of the house adding she would have liked to see thermal images of a "normal" house for comparison. Concluding, Ms. Hancock pointed out the property next door is for sale, adding she is sure all historical houses have some code deficiencies. Joyce Mellom, 4506 Arden Avenue, asked the Board if they received her two letters. Chair Rofidal responded in the affirmative. Dan Engel, Florida, informed the Board he is one of the Co- Trustees of the property, informing the Board his parents purchased their home in 1959. Mr. Engel acknowledged his parents were poor stewards of the property, adding the Trust as it's established doesn't have the assets to improve the home. Continuing, Mr. Engel stated the Trust is in a dire situation and the alternatives are limited. Concluding, Mr. Engel stated in his opinion there aren't many options available for this property; sell the house to Mr. and Mrs. Pronley, or rent the house and leave the key with the bank. Steve Lundberg, 4517 Arden Avenue, stated in his opinion "The horse is out of the barn." Pointing out there are a large number of homes in the district that have already been modified without HPB review. Mr. Lundberg said forcing rehabilitation isn't even common sense because in reality if the house is "rehabilitated" the majority of home will be "gone" and what's left is just facade rehabilitation. Kathie Cerra 4522 Arden Avenue, addressed the Board and stated over the past 10 years there has been continuous construction noise in her neighborhood from H PB Minutes January 12, 2010 Page 6 of 9 teardowns and additions to existing homes. This constant noise and construction vehicle traffic has completely disrupted the tranquility of the neighborhood. Ms. Cerra suggested that the Board deny the request and recommend that the City purchase the property to create a small park or an oasis of open space. Lee McGrath, 4619 Moorland Avenue, stated he is a believer in the 5th Amendment and the individual rights of property owners. Mr. McGrath said in his opinion the current recommendation infringes on those rights, adding an individual's property right vs. the community should be balanced. Concluding, Mr. McGrath encouraged the Board to uphold the rights of the property owner by allowing them to tear down the house and build a new house. Chair Rofidal asked if anyone else would like to speak to the topic. Being none; Member Forrest moved to close the public meeting. Member Blemaster seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion approved. Discussion, comments, questions from the Board Chair Rofidal asked if the mold growth had been documented. Planner Repya responded and acknowledged that mold was found in the home; however, no toxicity report was presented on the type(s) of mold found or exact location. Chair Rofidal suggested that Mr. Busyn consider providing a thermal image of a different house for comparison purposes. Member Forrest agreed that would be a good idea, adding winter and summer thermal imaging photos can be different and could also indicate a lack of insulation. Mr. Busyn agreed. Member Kojetin commented that he can't speak to the 5th Amendment; however, he believes that the majority (if not all) people living in the District are aware of its landmark designation and the restrictions placed on the District. Member Kojetin said the intent of the landmark designation is to preserve the look of the neighborhood; which in part is preservation of the front fagade of the home. Member Kojetin said the Plan of Treatment doesn't prevent a homeowner from maintaining their house or adding on to it, reiterating that preserving the front fagade and its scale is of the utmost importance. Concluding, Member Kojetin stated he believes the subject house can be rehabilitated leaving the front fagade intact, adding in his opinion the house as it exists today does have value. Member Schwartzbauer asked Member Kojetin if he would be in favor of the applicant keeping the front facade as is, and building back or tearing down the existing house and rebuilding the house with an identical front fagade. Member Kojetin said he thinks he would be in favor of either, adding maintaining the front streetscape is important to him. Member Rehkamp Larson said in her opinion the Board is preserving more than just the front fagade, adding old houses have smaller pieces and parts of significance. It isn't only the fagade one has to maintain. Member Rehkamp Larson said she believes there is an audience for restoring old houses, adding she has worked with these clients. HPB Minutes January 12, 2010 page 7 of 9 Member Schwartzbauer observed if this request is considered a "whole house issue" in his opinion it has been demonstrated that extensive deterioration has occurred. Member Schwartzbauer referred to language in the Plan of Treatment that indicates "unless the applicant can show that the subject property is not a heritage. preservation resource, or no longer contributes to the historical significance of the District because its historic integrity has been compromised by deterioration, damage or by inappropriate additions or alterations." Member Schwartzbauer said in reading that language one must also believe that the additions made to the home are inappropriate and would qualify the house for demolition. Concluding, Member Schwartzbauer reiterated that in his opinion the integrity of the house at 4505 Arden Avenue has been compromised and if any home in the District is a candidate for demolition this one is. Member Rehkamp Larson commented that in her opinion "the horse isn't out of the barn ", adding there's a lot to preserve in the District. Member Rehkamp Larson said the District consists of 550 strings that together hold up the landmark designation. Member Forrest stated as she understands the Plan of Treatment, the job of the Heritage Preservation Board is to preserve not only the facade of District houses, but to preserve the entire building and its place in the District. Member Forrest agreed significant "issues" were found with the house; however, the City's building official didn't render the building uninhabitable. Continuing, Member Forrest also pointed out economics is not the charge of the Board. Member Forrest concluded that in her opinion there is no evidence addressing the lack of historic significance of the home, adding people preserve old houses all the time, it's a fact of life. Concluding, Member Forrest said she agrees with City staff and Consultant Vogel that the house can be rehabilitated, adding she can't support the request to remove the heritage resource classification of the house. Member Blemaster said the role of the Board is to preserve and protect the historic features of homes in the District. She added the Board needs to be aware of the "slippery slope ", and shouldn't consider economics in the decision making process. Member Blemaster stated she believes this particular home can be rehabilitated; the additions could be eliminated leaving the original house intact. Member Schwartzbauer stated he doesn't believe anyone is disputing the relevancy of the Plan of Treatment. It is relevant; however the argument this evening is with the application to declassify the house to facilitate its removal to make way for a new house Continuing, Member Schwartzbauer referred to the two reports presented that indicate the additions aren't historically significant and are not appropriate and the house is in a serious state of deterioration. Member Schwartzbauer said if the Board is viewing the house "as a whole" the additions compromised the historic relevancy of the house "as a whole ". Member Blemaster pointed out the additions were added to the core of the home and if removed the "historic home" would remain. Member Montgomery commented that there may be historic integrity in the additions, HPB Minutes January 12, 2010 page 8of9 pointing out they were constructed in the 1930's and 1940's. Member Forrest stated that the architecture of the home was significant and if one looks at the Secretary of Interior's standards, the core of the house as it exists today continues to maintain its historic significance. Chair Rofidal said to the best of his knowledge the significance of the streetscape has been discussed many times by this Board, adding it's his understanding that the street scape is what can be seen from the front street. Continuing, Chair Rofidal acknowledged a recent teardown in the District at 4615 Wooddale Avenue that received a Certificate of Appropriateness to rebuild a new home in its place, adding these two cases are different in a number of ways. 1) The process was different, 2) Consultant Vogel recommended approval, and 3) The house at 4615 Wooddale was not an historic resource and would not qualify for its own designation. Continuing, Chair Rofidal stated this request is a struggle, acknowledging the property at 4505 Arden has deteriorated, and the additions added to the home are not appropriate. Member Forrest also added with regard to 4615 Wooddale that Thorpe used different standards for that house. Member Stenger told the Board at the last meeting when this issue was raised, he had expressed concern regarding safety; however, those concerns have been answered and the building inspector has indicated that the house is habitable. Member Stenger acknowledged that rehabilitation is inconvenient and expensive, but the charge of the HPB is to preserve. Member Rehkamp Larson noted the Plan of Treatment was revised recently, acknowledging there is a learning curve to the process. Member Rehkamp Larson thanked Mr. Busyn for his excellent presentation, which was clear, and the issues were thoroughly documented; however, she added that she could not support the request to declassify the historic significance of the house to make way for its removal. Action Member Forrest moved denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness to remove the heritage resource classification from the home based on staff and consultant findings. Member Rehkamp Larson seconded the motion. Ayes; Fukuda, Montgomery, Rehkamp Larson, Kojetin (want front facade maintained),Forrest, Blemaster, Stegner, Rofidal. Nay; Schwartzbauer. Motion carried. 111. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Chair Rofidal reported he has been participating in the review process to appoint new members to fill the vacancies left by members Fukuda, Blemaster and Kojetin, and has found during the process that Edina has some very talented and interesting residents HPB Minutes january 12, 2010 Page 9 of 9 with very different backgrounds. He stressed that the Board will miss the fine qualities and expertise Connie, Lou and Bob have exhibited, and thanked them for their service to the City of Edina and the Heritage Preservation Board. Chair Rofidal also reported that in March members of the HPB will need to elect a new chair when his term as chair expires. Member Kojetin told the Board he has enjoyed his time on the HPB. Kojetin explained that he also serves on the Historical Society Board, and he encouraged the HPB to become members. Membership applications were passed out to all with Kojetin stressing that the annual fee was only $15 — a great deal!! Board members thanked Kojetin for his years of service to the HPB, and agreed membership in the Historical Society would be a good way to support the community. V. NEXT MEETING DATE: February 9, 2010 VI. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9: 55 PM Respectfully submitted, Jaclzz�e rtooeeoMl er MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL FERUARY 1, 2010 5:00 P.M. Mayor Pro Tern Housh called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. in the Community Room at City Hall. Answering roll call were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, and Mayor Pro Tem Housh. Mayor Hovland and Chair lyer arrived at 5:30 p.m. Edina Energy and Environment Commissioners present were: Commissioners Christianson, Hanson, lyer, Paterlini, Platteter, Sierks, Latham, and Thompson. Absent were Commissioners Risser and Lee. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. Assistant City Manager, Heather Worthington explained the GreenStep Cities Pilot Program to the City Council. She explained that after the pilot program Minnesota cities would have an opportunity to become a GreenStep City. The City Council and Commissioners discussed specific topics related to GreenStep Cities. The Energy and Environment Commission made the following recommendations to City Council members for consideration: 1. Endorse Energy and Environment Commission's (EEC) GreenStep Cities Work Plan. 2. Evaluate Edina's continued part in the GreenStep Cities after the pilot program. 3. Consider options for implementation of the best practices including funding. The City Council endorsed the recommendations and thanked the Commission for all their hard work. The consensus was to have a follow up meeting after the pilot program ended. Two requests were made by Chair lyer and discussed by the Commission and Council. The EEC would like to work more closely with the Planning Commission, Transportation Commission and Park Board. Chair lyer proposed that sub - groups of each commission be permitted to work together. After discussing attendance requirements (not applicable to sub -group meetings) and a desire to not burden commissioners with too many meetings, the Council recommended that the commissioners decide themselves how to work together. Chair lyer's second request was that, with the EEC's shift in focus from project -based work to policy -based work, the Council bring policy matters to the EEC. The Council expressed support for this request. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk James C. Hovland, Mayor Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 7 of 14 Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. Public Comment Robert Scroggins, 6256 Sandpiper Court, addressed the Commission and stated he lives in the multi - family development directly west and adjacent to the subject property, adding he has worked with and has the highest respect for Mr. Jensen. Continuing, Mr. Scroggins said he believes the City's Park & Recreation Department is considering reconfiguring Country Side Park, and if that's'the/ case; Colonial should get together with the City to discuss and work together on/ any changes. Mr. Scroggins reported that where he lives lidhitng fror� the church hasn't been a problem. Concluding, Mr. Scroggins stated' the City should stay firm on their recommendation that the project provides affordable housing;iU approved.`�� ' Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff Place told the Commission he'has a number of points `\ he would like to share with them, adding.they are not pro or con. 1. vacancies already exist in a number of assisted living facilities;, 2. the building as proposed is "out of sync" with the- chara_ cter of the, neighborhood (too tall); y, 3. the proposed assisted living facility is a for = profit venture. It,may be better if it were non - profit; 4. the proposed location for the assisted living facility is close to a City park where children play etc; 5. if approved the church is "giving up" the south paikinglot; should a Proof of Parking Agreement be required especially when the church has contiguous events there is ovrrflow. Concluding, Mr. Johnson said he)k`buld like the Planning, Commission to table this issue. Mr. Johnson said there still are, a number of issues-that need to be addressed; adding sewer Capacity and the aquifer are also issues that should be addressed to ensure- they_have the capacity to`handle the proposed developmentlMr. Johnsori also questioned the size of the building and asked the applicant to consider a smaller facility `The facility- a- as proposed is just too large. Diane Greig, 6412 Red Fox, addressed the Commission and told them she has a problem with traffic, adding Tracy Avenue is very busy and can be hazardous. Ms. Greig pointed out this neighborhood has Crosstown and the High School on one side and the grade school on the other side. Ms. Greig explained from experience she knows that assisted living facility /nursing home units are empty. She said there is a trend of aging in place; however, there has to be a way to get comment tcoEll: I apologize for younger families the opportunity to live in Edina top............................ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - leaving this out of the draft minutes sent to you as part of the packet. 1 accidently / tagged this onto another item discussed at the 127 Planning Commission meeting. \ 1WPlanningDepartment Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 8 of 14 Dorothy Krezner, 5928 Jeff Place, addressed the Commission and informed them she is very concerned with light spillage and traffic. Josephine Braun, 5833 Jeff Place, acknowledged that Colonial Church has been a good neighbor and expressed the following concerns: 1. construction impact on the water level, noting this area has a high water table. 2. removal of trees 3. traffic William Rodgers, 6100 Arbor Lane, told the Commission traffi&is really a conce on Tracy Avenue. He pointed out that today the majority- f kids'drivelheir own cars to school and adding school buses to the mix creates congestion Concluding, .Mr. Rodgers questioned if a sound wall is planned -if tl% assisted \. living facility is constructed. i Chair Fischer asked if anyone else would care to speak. to the issue ;.being none; Commissioner Brown moved to close the publid-lrarinR Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Discussion and Questions Chair Fischer noted that it appears from commen majority of their concern is traffic. Commissioner applicant provided a traffic analysis and it appear that conflict from this project if any is miiimal Bur Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. changes. Mr. Jensen responded adding its "manned" 24 hours 0 note that the facility is located ne the option of using -mass transit. the neighbors that the jder noted that. the 1 based on that analysis peak times. _ facility has shift facility doesrrt have shift /changes, lensen also asked -the "Commission to ;itl(ne which would enable employees Commissioner. Brown asked Mr`Jensen die, parking demand" patterns for employees and'visitors; adding parking is a concern /Mr. Jensen responded that there are between 40 -45 employees during the peak time 9 am -6 pm. The majority of visitors come between 6 pm and 8:30 pm M -F plus weekend days. He/said there aren't a lot of morning visitors. Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Jensen if the.empioyee parking would be�under the building. Mr. Jensen responded in the affirmative. Chair Fischer noted Mr•. John sugg �ted the possibility of implementing a Proof of Parkin�Agreement to/ensure �adequate parking and asked Mr. Jensen if he knows of a good place to "designate" that parking. Mr. Jensen responded that there are areas in the lower levelparking garage earmarked for storage and from EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2009 7:00 PM - MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Arnie Bigbee John Cashmore Lisa Finsness Jessi Kingston Bob Mayer Meg Newell Ralph Overholt Russ Stanton Members Absent Shara Mohtadi, Student Emma Weisberg, Student Guests Phil Duran Idelle Longman Staff Susan Howl Reordered Items on Agenda Approved Member Kingston seconded Member Cashmore's motion to reorder items on the agenda. The motion carried. Minutes Approved Member Bigbee seconded Member Newell's motion to approve the minutes of November 24, 2009, as amended: a) The By -Laws Subcommittee membership was corrected to read "Members Bigbee, Kingston and Stanton." b) Descriptive information regarding the FMLA was corrected to read: "The City must be mindful of the interplay between sick leave, bereavement and FMLA. What is done locally must meet minimum requirements under FMLA; however, the City, like other employers, is always free to provide benefits above and beyond federal FMLA and State leave laws." The motion carried. LMHRC Information Shared Idelle Longman, former HRRC Member and current member of the LMHRC, was introduced and welcomed. She was thanked for her work in getting the Commissioners registered at the League's Annual Conference in St. Paul in December. Regarding the work of the League, Idelle shared that its work "was full" with the following activities: • Annual Conference • Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan Committee which continues to update the State Plan • By -Laws Committee • Legislative Committee • Nominating Committee I 0 • Payroll Committee • School Education Committee • Website Committee • Librarian • Annual Meeting (recently hosted at Edina City Hall) • Global Issue Committee • GLBT Committee Idelle shared that she is the agent for the HRRC to pass on messages to the League via its individual, committees. She was asked by the Commission to look into diversity clauses that the University might have in place. The Commissioners raised concern about the election proceedings that took place during the Annual Conference regarding district representation by the local commissions — specifically Edina. A follow -up with the League was suggested. Proposed Domestic Partnership Ordinances Member Kingston shared the proposed Domestic Partnership Ordinances and the wording for resolutions to be presented to the Edina City Council. The following action was taken regarding the five specific items: • Item 1) - Approved. Member Overholt seconded Member Kingston's motion. In the description, the word "deregister" was changed to "terminate." • Item 2) - Approved. Member Finsness seconded Member Bigbee's motion, with the word "household" added. • Item 3) - Approved. Member Cashmore seconded Member Bigbee's motion, with the words "same or opposite sex" replaced by "without regard to sex." In the description, the new language would be underlined. • Item 4) - Approved. Member Kingston seconded Member Cashmore's motion, with six ayes and two nays, to remove "$100,000" and "21 employees" from Exhibit B —the Equal Benefits Ordinance. • Item 5) - Approved. Member Finsness seconded Member Bigbee's motion. Member Finsness seconded Member Cashmore's motion that a resolution be presented to the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions urging the State Legislature to grant permission for the cities to equalize benefits for all their employees. Edited material will be distributed at the January Commission meeting. Division of Responsibility Recommended Member Bigbee shared .the recommendation that the Commission recreate itself —i.e. perhaps becoming two commissions in order to differentiate between the delivery of human services and human rights. Discussion ensued, and it was agreed that this would be a topic of discussion at the next meeting under the work plan. Human Services Budget Revised Because the City Attorney had revealed that there are no statutory grounds for the City to fund the Edina ABC Program, the need to reallocate the amount of $5400 proposed to fund ABC was discussed. Member Bigbee seconded Member Cashmore's motion to make a pro rata distribution of the $5400 among_ the remaining eight providers. The motion carried with two nays and one abstention. Subcommittee Created for. the Annual Work Plan At the January 2010 Commission Meeting, a draft work plan will be presented to the full Commission by the newly- created Work Plan Subcommittee Members — Bigbee, Finsness and Stanton. Work Session with the Edina City Council Recommended The Commissioners requested that staff liaison Howl seek a date for the City Council to hold a work session with HRRC. Adjournment There being no further business of the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Russell Stanton, Chair Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission tV THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus of The Colonial Church of Edina PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REZONING PERMIT M!I,AtO THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING" I. A,chitect ure I Engineering I Planning Han,nel, Green eno Abrahamson, Inc. 202 1st Are n us SW -Suite 700 Rochester, Minneso[• USA 55907 -3179 Telephone 507.201.9600 Focal Wile SO].201.t600 PROJECT LOCATION ' CURRENT PACKAGE INFORMATION COMMISSION NUMBER: 3077 - 001 -00 DATE: DECEMBER 23, 2009 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE HISTORY PACKAGE I PACKAGE DESCRIPTION I DATE City of Edina December 28, 2009 PLANNING SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT COVER SHEET 3077- 001 -00 DAT_ December 23, 2009 A000 MJENSEN CML LANDSCAPE ARCfIITECTURAL SU - t SURVEY 2 A2oo GROUND LEVEL FLOOR 9AN SUNV y 3 1201 U1N65.^AP- c1AN A201 FIRST FLOOR PLAN C20D SRC DEMOIRpN PLM A202 SECOND FLOOR PL C30D WE ,A+ PLAN A203 THIRD FLOOR DLAN C, SITE GRADI- PLAN A209 FOURTF LEVC_ FLOOR PLAN C— SRE L11 oLN1 A900 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS —1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COLDR ILLUSTRATIONS CONCEPRNL PLAN FOR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE P.M AMENDMENT AMA— NEW OF SITE RENDERED VIEW A — LOOKING EAS- WIIF VEGETATION RENDERED VIEW At - L"ING EAST RENDERED VIEW R - LOOKING SOUTHEAST WIDi VEGETATION RENDERED VIEW RI - LOOKING SOUTHEAST RENDERED VIEW C - SCHEMATIC NORTH ELEVATION RENDERED VIEW Cl - PARTML AM SCHEMATIC NORTH ELEVATION 1 a ORT RC'ORL THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING LI c - T EWATERS OF EDINA s s SENIOR LIVING' Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus a. A of The Colonial Church of Edina R C R M!I,AtO THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING" I. A,chitect ure I Engineering I Planning Han,nel, Green eno Abrahamson, Inc. 202 1st Are n us SW -Suite 700 Rochester, Minneso[• USA 55907 -3179 Telephone 507.201.9600 Focal Wile SO].201.t600 PROJECT LOCATION ' CURRENT PACKAGE INFORMATION COMMISSION NUMBER: 3077 - 001 -00 DATE: DECEMBER 23, 2009 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE HISTORY PACKAGE I PACKAGE DESCRIPTION I DATE City of Edina December 28, 2009 PLANNING SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT COVER SHEET 3077- 001 -00 DAT_ December 23, 2009 A000 MJENSEN I� RIX INC. Boundary /Topographic Tree Survey N a° , I I I I 1 I i I . I , ( r I � I� I 1i r' 30 , , , 1 \,o 1 Colonial Church of Edina 5200 Colonel Wby EOlm, MN. 55476 ,a L -M0. R -1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) PID No. 05- 116 -21 -21 -0005 r `I 9\'pGl_ / :,ln IIn! n,/ \` JO I The Waters Senior living of Edina L'M1/ - - t W o A?'.b"\ y` as l w\ 0 ° eW m ,m R ,h•9 Panyaf no Is a. COLONIAL CHURCH EDINA, MN TNH-871.98 (NGVD 29) LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE " � I I 2 I SECTION B. TOWN"' 116, RANGE 21 HENNEPIN COUNTY,' MINNESOTA. ®IXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION �..: y (A. par Sdh.dde A of Commitment to Title from First Amadwn Title hnurance Company, File No. NCS -321079 -AWLS, dated March 1, 2009.) ' PARCEL 1: Lot 1. Bbtl1 2, .. Ch. or Edma First Addition, Hennepin Canty, Minnesota PARCEL 2 xNor ettdueN. a.-t far paling pUrPas.s over part f Lot 1. Block 1. for, al Church of Edma first Aedrclom, a. anntained and desabed n the Parking Lei Ag ent noorded as Document No. w� 4338375 h Ue records of the Canty Retarder, Hennepin Canty, hkmaoto. �� � Abstract Property 0 ROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ,g ` That part of Lot 1, Black 2, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FlRST ADDITION, aecaMlnq to the recorded EG' plot Mareo/, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying easterly and southerly of the fdloehq deettRrod pins: C minutes lnq at the meat easterly northeast comer of sold Lot 1; thence North 89 dogmas 33 Louise 42 semMa West saw d bearing, dang the north Ilne of sdtl Let i. aliatanw of 33298 test thence North 88 degrees 57 minute 34 ..-de West, a dfetanw of 173.74 thence along a w to tine northeast hwnq a radius of 155.58 test, c control male of 9 degree 18 minutes 78 eemnd.. tangent to last dseorned Ina a distance of 25.28 feet to the Point et beginning of the III to be desalted; tl,enos South 53 degrees 00 minutes 18 eenontle Wall, a tllatanw of 250.34 fast thence South 94 degrsee 07 minutes 58 seconds East, a d4lame of 4031 feel; thence South 53 deyyreea 00 minutes 18 seconds Went" a distance of 160.35 feet thenos North 87 degree 37 minutes 12 second, West a distance of 11.62 feel. thence South 04 deprsee 00 minutes 18 \ wn4, seconds West, a dlslonce of 211.57 feet, more or lase, to the south Tina o1 sold Lo! 1, ale there / I I terminating. /m, =. s ^t - +cr> •n "7f t%, /' �, ] +jam � tee` / �e'fv' -r, ��" �� =�' � �, 7scn. _ .is 4w"r..� °K' x6Sk roc yII x,.m rf Omt3o✓ � / //' rp, ,�Za .sin/ / f„ j // .i�.�Y /_ ^ = ` � � � �� •��Jti " / nr t�{a osa] Z �,L, �� � ,.. 1 n,4z'9�(��r`y // �ynn�•m �� ���(y�� Skx .Y"Ha 1M1 /'� s '�/ // /�.i�r. �' � \ \ n aaaa / i ,•s1s,y r / v �_ .sue ,I er tom 1 ,�...- . ��sa' p m,3,a `Y,dlna / L/ + �/ j /'{� - �ir�.' %: £ e`A°aRR",i, ,d,s•� , •,�t / n .,73. e 63 fi, .sib 5•.a ,, [�=,,4,°.. i/Ita� m' � ,RI•e� �/ � T" u(Wweµ' ', - -� .., "mwx / ne4•�� -seas/ ` / /�/ - p aa, m„w s t ono b� e,37s 'Ts�' is F x w 19,.3• \I • ^ 0LEGENG .y ��^�� �� •�' .�,..�, �,.�,,... t•Sl� / // /eaer.s 14- CAST IRON MONUMENT I = WATERMAN w . w '4= \ /- �/ / iaA7 `� = JUDICIAL LANDMARK > - SANITARY SEWER fir - SANITARY FORCEMN ,.yes / �' / / /�� // / 0 -IRON MONUMENT FOUND AI 0- [,;�'yj/Q �,jr Jjp J j�I i /I � 1 JI ` � / C'M/ � J"� � H s J• tam�UA= •es a ee -16Jia J� H � / e1 n / 0 a � •�t ' ' / ' / � /�/ / �a � / / / / � / � � / / / / � N MO NUMENT �Q MARKED uuuos [ [ ar v STORM SE WER CAS MAN VATH � � FOUND PK NAIL a = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC or- F"D SPIKE = UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE = OVERHEAD CABLE ON a 1�o- HYDRANT a UNDERGROUND CABLE 111111S K/ O = STORM SEWER MANHOLE m - OVERHEAD TELEPHONE Ill CATCH BASIN ui - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE gir • 73a�111 A / I / �'/ / w1e1.6 / / Tbee - GALE VALVE m - FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE 17 Tom. G - CABLE TELEVISION BOX ` _ ,oD- :lT NPOGRAPMC INDEX CONTOUR th ol� Bodr.2� �� / l ®- ElECB6LAL BOX _ =�2 - = = TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR IOJI - ELECIIBC METER = EDGE OF WETLAND i�rnq�t ELECTRIC HAND HOLE - -x- - FENCE No w T, 1 . n.! ii w(an, y�f' v ' Gp t d b / _ fJt seas sc Js•a / 3 31 - CONTROLLED ACCESS J-'K/' l w\ 0 ° eW m ,m R ,h•9 Panyaf no Is a. COLONIAL CHURCH EDINA, MN TNH-871.98 (NGVD 29) LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE " � I I 2 I SECTION B. TOWN"' 116, RANGE 21 HENNEPIN COUNTY,' MINNESOTA. ®IXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION �..: y (A. par Sdh.dde A of Commitment to Title from First Amadwn Title hnurance Company, File No. NCS -321079 -AWLS, dated March 1, 2009.) ' PARCEL 1: Lot 1. Bbtl1 2, .. Ch. or Edma First Addition, Hennepin Canty, Minnesota PARCEL 2 xNor ettdueN. a.-t far paling pUrPas.s over part f Lot 1. Block 1. for, al Church of Edma first Aedrclom, a. anntained and desabed n the Parking Lei Ag ent noorded as Document No. w� 4338375 h Ue records of the Canty Retarder, Hennepin Canty, hkmaoto. �� � Abstract Property 0 ROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ,g ` That part of Lot 1, Black 2, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FlRST ADDITION, aecaMlnq to the recorded EG' plot Mareo/, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying easterly and southerly of the fdloehq deettRrod pins: C minutes lnq at the meat easterly northeast comer of sold Lot 1; thence North 89 dogmas 33 Louise 42 semMa West saw d bearing, dang the north Ilne of sdtl Let i. aliatanw of 33298 test thence North 88 degrees 57 minute 34 ..-de West, a dfetanw of 173.74 thence along a w to tine northeast hwnq a radius of 155.58 test, c control male of 9 degree 18 minutes 78 eemnd.. tangent to last dseorned Ina a distance of 25.28 feet to the Point et beginning of the III to be desalted; tl,enos South 53 degrees 00 minutes 18 eenontle Wall, a tllatanw of 250.34 fast thence South 94 degrsee 07 minutes 58 seconds East, a d4lame of 4031 feel; thence South 53 deyyreea 00 minutes 18 seconds Went" a distance of 160.35 feet thenos North 87 degree 37 minutes 12 second, West a distance of 11.62 feel. thence South 04 deprsee 00 minutes 18 \ wn4, seconds West, a dlslonce of 211.57 feet, more or lase, to the south Tina o1 sold Lo! 1, ale there / I I terminating. /m, =. s ^t - +cr> •n "7f t%, /' �, ] +jam � tee` / �e'fv' -r, ��" �� =�' � �, 7scn. _ .is 4w"r..� °K' x6Sk roc yII x,.m rf Omt3o✓ � / //' rp, ,�Za .sin/ / f„ j // .i�.�Y /_ ^ = ` � � � �� •��Jti " / nr t�{a osa] Z �,L, �� � ,.. 1 n,4z'9�(��r`y // �ynn�•m �� ���(y�� Skx .Y"Ha 1M1 /'� s '�/ // /�.i�r. �' � \ \ n aaaa / i ,•s1s,y r / v �_ .sue ,I er tom 1 ,�...- . ��sa' p m,3,a `Y,dlna / L/ + �/ j /'{� - �ir�.' %: £ e`A°aRR",i, ,d,s•� , •,�t / n .,73. e 63 fi, .sib 5•.a ,, [�=,,4,°.. i/Ita� m' � ,RI•e� �/ � T" u(Wweµ' ', - -� .., "mwx / ne4•�� -seas/ ` / /�/ - p aa, m„w s t ono b� e,37s 'Ts�' is F x w 19,.3• \I • ^ 0LEGENG .y ��^�� �� •�' .�,..�, �,.�,,... t•Sl� / // /eaer.s 14- CAST IRON MONUMENT I = WATERMAN w . w '4= \ /- �/ / iaA7 `� = JUDICIAL LANDMARK > - SANITARY SEWER fir - SANITARY FORCEMN ,.yes / �' / / /�� // / 0 -IRON MONUMENT FOUND AI 0- [,;�'yj/Q �,jr Jjp J j�I i /I � 1 JI ` � / C'M/ � J"� � H s J• tam�UA= •es a ee -16Jia J� H � / e1 n / 0 a � •�t ' ' / ' / � /�/ / �a � / / / / � / � � / / / / � N MO NUMENT �Q MARKED uuuos [ [ ar v STORM SE WER CAS MAN VATH � � FOUND PK NAIL a = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC or- F"D SPIKE = UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE = OVERHEAD CABLE ON a 1�o- HYDRANT a UNDERGROUND CABLE 111111S K/ O = STORM SEWER MANHOLE m - OVERHEAD TELEPHONE Ill CATCH BASIN ui - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE gir • 73a�111 A / I / �'/ / w1e1.6 / / Tbee - GALE VALVE m - FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE 17 Tom. G - CABLE TELEVISION BOX ` _ ,oD- :lT NPOGRAPMC INDEX CONTOUR th ol� Bodr.2� �� / l ®- ElECB6LAL BOX _ =�2 - = = TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR IOJI - ELECIIBC METER = EDGE OF WETLAND i�rnq�t ELECTRIC HAND HOLE - -x- - FENCE M NOTES ' 1. Fee simple cwnerahlp 1. .sled in The Colonial Church of Edina, a Min ... to nor- proflt corporation. 2 Argo of property M 266.772 IKII or 6.12 eau. 3. Property he atetroot. 4. The property has apceee to Colonial Way, a dedicated public street 5 Th. oddrea of the property h 6200 Cdonnl Way, Edna, MN 55436. 6. Se. Sheet 2 of 2 for Tree 1 -tory. 7. Above ground utilities ha. been Gold located os am-. At underground utility cervieea eMoh the property haw attempted to be field located ihrouph the aersleee of Catch State One Call per ticket number 90196022. Hornier, som. of the "111ty, oompanl.s failed to Gold locale nax�aa.d d" Ixatbn. In Loose caeca "'It" shown ors from Qty of Edina and predoue Ne. The farwra m9kee n. guarantees that the underground utilities shorn comprise all .such .01%. In the sea, ellher h sear:. or bandmad. The surveyor further does not wonant that the underground ut9ltlee shown we h the exact location indicated although he a-. c.Z that they are located as =td u paaDle from Information awJebla. The 1-Y, has not pphh ledl I-'. the underground uIAIUae. Prlar to any exouwtlm err digging ..tact G,pher Stale da�Cdl far an on alt. locat'on (651 - 454-0002). B Underground fiber opU, Ina rune r m th and uth near the east line of the property. L.atim of Ik,e b per field morkings In place at the Ume of wrwy 9 TM property Ile. In Hoed zone X (areas datermhed to be outside the 0214 annual chance flood plane) o. doelgn.ted do Flood I-ce Role Map Community Panel Number 27053C0363E. CIO of also, pu.!al by the FedI Emergency Management Agency of ea 1. data September 2. 2004, 10. Hems Pertanirq to Sehetlule 6- Section 1 of Commitment to Title from First Amwkm Title Inwranca Company, Fhe No. NCS- 381079 -MPLS, dated Maroh 1, 2009: OItem 10 - property oI to aosemmto far uitl8r, dmimgs and pan dnp purposes as shown 10 . the recorded plat of COLONIAL CHUR04 OF ED FIRST ADDITION, recorded Octabor 4, 1977 .. Document Ne. 4311765 ee shown harem. Item 11 - Easement for drdnoge ditch purposes, together with my Incidental rights, In fowr of The Nl.g. (now Qty) of Edna, a Minnesota municipal aorpon.U., as contained in the Eaeenent far 0minage DNah, dated Nowmder 7, 1980, receded Nwernber 22, 1960 as Document No. 3263251 n Book 2278 Dads at page 548, d the Easement for Qalnage Ditch, dated Nowmbar 3, 1960, r rded No.mber 22. 1960 ae Dowmmt No. 3263252 h Rook 2276 Dead, at page 540. Does not affect this pertlon of Lot 1, Block 2 12 Item 12 - Property la subject to a lock of direct cboaso Ic County Read No. 62 as shown by Condemnation No. 384 Final Certificate, dated August 21, 1967 recorded August 25, 1967 as Document No. 3871986 in Back 2599 of Deeds at page 347 as Mown hereon Item 13 - Easement for drainage and filtering systern purposes, together with any Incidental Cght.. In 1.- of R,e `Agog. (rww City) of Edina, . Minnesota municipal corporation, ee Lain., in the Wartanty Dsed, dated February 2, 1977, as Doo-ent No 4336375. Doss not afloat this potion of Lot 1, Block 2. Hem 14 - Property wbject to covenants, conditions. natric11ons, obligations, proA,iw,, and duets eaeamsm. aeltalned In the Parking Lot Agreement, dated November 11, 1977, ne-ded D-ba 2, 1877. 11. F. proposed grading, drainage and ocalm, eontrd information, refer to the Site Grading, Qdnage cod Surfacing Plan dated December 23, 2009, prepared by Hammel, Green and Abraham. ,Inc. an [ =b m oga ,a °a z gag z 5 �aa � Y fig; Y a m Y x x oa Y S6 ff � seesse�� w Lfl NO O Z O U Y y L a O C N p C J (v °< U H Q O <4 Q ZH � mew p > �)za ,. o Of J=)i V) 05 Q 0 G_ O Z Q M R ELECTRIC MANHOLE -0-- ELECIRIC POLE e - CONTROLLED ACCESS ROWEIt X 800.0 =SPOT ELEVATION ELECIPoC TRANSFORMER BOX O = DEg000U5 TREE -LIGHT POLE = CONIFEROUS TREE GUARD POST HANDICAPM PARKING TI 0 40 60 d - SIGN ". ' �� '"• B - TELEPHONE BOX - - &NMNOUS SURFACE SCALE IN FEET - TELEPHONE MANHOLE FSBENCHMARK ._ -- -- ur BI BASIS OF BEARINGS _ ... °. D - FILAR END SECTION CONCRETE SURFACE 4M (Top NW of Hydrant) F., the purpose of this survey the most coat dy line of Lot 1, > -- GUY WWE ':'; - (RAVEL SURFACE -the top nut of the 136 hydrant bcoted m the rwrth alto of Bloc, 2 COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION, anourding Colonial Way nee the noRhewt owner of Ma. Ele - 871.98 - feat (NCVD 29). to the recorded plat thereat, Hennepin County, Minnesota la .awned to bear N00'00'18"E. aY .Y WETAND M NOTES ' 1. Fee simple cwnerahlp 1. .sled in The Colonial Church of Edina, a Min ... to nor- proflt corporation. 2 Argo of property M 266.772 IKII or 6.12 eau. 3. Property he atetroot. 4. The property has apceee to Colonial Way, a dedicated public street 5 Th. oddrea of the property h 6200 Cdonnl Way, Edna, MN 55436. 6. Se. Sheet 2 of 2 for Tree 1 -tory. 7. Above ground utilities ha. been Gold located os am-. At underground utility cervieea eMoh the property haw attempted to be field located ihrouph the aersleee of Catch State One Call per ticket number 90196022. Hornier, som. of the "111ty, oompanl.s failed to Gold locale nax�aa.d d" Ixatbn. In Loose caeca "'It" shown ors from Qty of Edina and predoue Ne. The farwra m9kee n. guarantees that the underground utilities shorn comprise all .such .01%. In the sea, ellher h sear:. or bandmad. The surveyor further does not wonant that the underground ut9ltlee shown we h the exact location indicated although he a-. c.Z that they are located as =td u paaDle from Information awJebla. The 1-Y, has not pphh ledl I-'. the underground uIAIUae. Prlar to any exouwtlm err digging ..tact G,pher Stale da�Cdl far an on alt. locat'on (651 - 454-0002). B Underground fiber opU, Ina rune r m th and uth near the east line of the property. L.atim of Ik,e b per field morkings In place at the Ume of wrwy 9 TM property Ile. In Hoed zone X (areas datermhed to be outside the 0214 annual chance flood plane) o. doelgn.ted do Flood I-ce Role Map Community Panel Number 27053C0363E. CIO of also, pu.!al by the FedI Emergency Management Agency of ea 1. data September 2. 2004, 10. Hems Pertanirq to Sehetlule 6- Section 1 of Commitment to Title from First Amwkm Title Inwranca Company, Fhe No. NCS- 381079 -MPLS, dated Maroh 1, 2009: OItem 10 - property oI to aosemmto far uitl8r, dmimgs and pan dnp purposes as shown 10 . the recorded plat of COLONIAL CHUR04 OF ED FIRST ADDITION, recorded Octabor 4, 1977 .. Document Ne. 4311765 ee shown harem. Item 11 - Easement for drdnoge ditch purposes, together with my Incidental rights, In fowr of The Nl.g. (now Qty) of Edna, a Minnesota municipal aorpon.U., as contained in the Eaeenent far 0minage DNah, dated Nowmder 7, 1980, receded Nwernber 22, 1960 as Document No. 3263251 n Book 2278 Dads at page 548, d the Easement for Qalnage Ditch, dated Nowmbar 3, 1960, r rded No.mber 22. 1960 ae Dowmmt No. 3263252 h Rook 2276 Dead, at page 540. Does not affect this pertlon of Lot 1, Block 2 12 Item 12 - Property la subject to a lock of direct cboaso Ic County Read No. 62 as shown by Condemnation No. 384 Final Certificate, dated August 21, 1967 recorded August 25, 1967 as Document No. 3871986 in Back 2599 of Deeds at page 347 as Mown hereon Item 13 - Easement for drainage and filtering systern purposes, together with any Incidental Cght.. In 1.- of R,e `Agog. (rww City) of Edina, . Minnesota municipal corporation, ee Lain., in the Wartanty Dsed, dated February 2, 1977, as Doo-ent No 4336375. Doss not afloat this potion of Lot 1, Block 2. Hem 14 - Property wbject to covenants, conditions. natric11ons, obligations, proA,iw,, and duets eaeamsm. aeltalned In the Parking Lot Agreement, dated November 11, 1977, ne-ded D-ba 2, 1877. 11. F. proposed grading, drainage and ocalm, eontrd information, refer to the Site Grading, Qdnage cod Surfacing Plan dated December 23, 2009, prepared by Hammel, Green and Abraham. ,Inc. an [ =b m oga ,a °a z gag z 5 �aa � Y fig; Y a m Y x x oa Y S6 ff � seesse�� w Lfl NO O Z O U Y y L a O C N p C J (v °< U H Q O <4 Q ZH � mew p > �)za ,. o Of J=)i V) 05 Q 0 G_ O Z Q M RLK INC. Certifiacte of Survey W/ Proposed Building Over /ay The Waters Senior living of Edina o�' COLONIAL CHURCH ' ED/NA, MN 1 I It \ `9eoehmerk- _ TNH- 871.96 (HIND 29) Colonial Church of YEdino Eft.. N SBI36 \ 4 \ �:�F( R -t in Is Dwellingg Unit District \ iTffi 5:53 3 PI No 05 -116 -21 -21 -ODDS \\ b •Wt9iRitt 428! 9ta t c +sat._ t�L� +�iti,4 �tf l .$8%„3342 f oa ,-M� , e mDloteck y i3 k i — 2 we of w 81- 1 r e 3• r. - _ ___ - _ -r- - o o no9> s umny EZ7 P — o Plal f COLONIAL CHURCH 0• 1 (IPY� f e EJINA FIRST ADDITION t8 q M. ft, FEW Hit /� LLJI/s \ 1 t�•fY /';l �-^� 4 cow,✓ g � �� � � ' `�� v, ` �\ `,� a � � � s V �` .� �.i �.I o ° t 62 < �" � a.T � , P,ap � I 0$ E � w / C. 4 \/To a ust� 1. X tJG (. V To.P b 'a.+L'/ I [,I,•..f,) z LR 269.06 ?1 I �. � •��i �} i �3���%9 \� ` 'o v �i" � � �* �4978r16rr MOMWIRINNIN 1r # a$' � ' � 1 $£'�3� �j �. \., �� {fyj[����jj�jj� jww'.,' \I��/\ OL.Pt �ZI � �s•f` -. ': ,LEGEND' . t CAST IRON MONUMENT - WATERMAIN JUDICIAL LANDMARK ne - SANITARY FEVER 1+% ,(:} iV - SANITARY RCEMAIN (�} V r�,Y 0- IRON MONUMENT FOUND i # V' O - IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED » - ST. SEVER i ( WTH U ENSE NO. 23966. Uo - GAS MAIN - FOUND PK NAIL o[ - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC �,. (� ^eGI t/,} t`/ •]��T`{�j �,.I > j P jr_ FOUND SPIKE U[ - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC \J IV t . O - SANI - OVERHEAD CABLE TEIEMSION TARY SEWER MANHOLE pn, r- -30 - JO ---.( (-"1 # i I # Q ;y'•i 39 '38 Ate / e Qw = HWRANT - UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVSION O - STORM SEWER MANHOLE - OVERHEAD TELEPHONE _ A�a� --•-' / ®a® -CATCH BASIN ur - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE GATE VALVE fn - FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE • A .5 - CABLE TELEVISION BOX 400— - TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR ,1 743. B - ELECTRICAL BOX _ e ci �- seam me of Let 1. Book 2 40.20 OOrr BLW - ELECTRIC METER -- _ TOPOGRAPHIC o70UR OF W -- Not Tangnt O - ELECTRIC HAND HOLE 1 —X —X e— - FENCE - ELECTRIC MANHOLE (� p A - CONTROLLED ACCESS -0-- ELECTRIC POWER Et GAS METER POLE X 6010 - SPOT ELEVATION ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOX Q - DECIDUOUS TREE ..... # - uOIT POLE CONIFEROUS TREE �a 8 b X X O Y fA i i 0: ; Z: C U � 0 oo 0 o In L. Z O UsY I $c +� = m No c t0•- N �R m 3a N F } J W Y N O=r mecn N U L" Z oZ 9 i U _jwz � m 0 Ld v o LL O 0- F a 0 Of 0 W U J I°i 00 r OD } (V 3 o N 8 - WARD POST HANOCAPED PARKING - TREEUNE e0 40 80 Sim - TELEPHONE BOX =BITUMINOUS SURFACE o SCALE IN FEET . TELEPHONE MANHOLE - D - FLARED ON SECTION a - CONCRETE suRFACE BENCHMARK TNH (Tap Nut of Hydrant) L BASIS OF BEARINGS For the p ,pmee of Via e y the —et eoeterly Ilne of Lot 1,. OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION, k -- OUY WIRE - GRAVEL Sl1RFACE -the top nut of the fire hydrant located on the north side of gColonial WAY near the nor .t — of efts. Block 2, COLONIAL CHURCH according to the recorded pot thereof, H—ph, County, Minneeeta le Div.- 871.98 - feet (NGVD 29). see W to bar N00900.18'E. � - WETLAryO �a 8 b X X O Y fA i i 0: ; Z: C U � 0 oo 0 o In L. Z O UsY I $c +� = m No c t0•- N �R m 3a N F } J W Y N O=r mecn N U L" Z oZ 9 i U _jwz � m 0 Ld v o LL O 0- F a 0 Of 0 W U J I°i 00 r OD } (V 3 o N Tree Inventory �i4'+WY'.Y��OQ • �m�oQ raw® ©Q� ��,.r•-�ooQ� mm�a© ®�rdrrw O�ooQ� MEN mmi O�ooQ� " ZZAZ ow � �omQQ� ®000Q�� ��m000 ��000Q '�OQ•0� �O�OQ ®mooQ� ®mooQ� �S'QE�OQ� ®D00 �OOQ ©® �0 ®O® E ®oOQ 0m0oQ� _ 077000 �c7�7Q•OQ� 0m0o0 �m 000Q� ©oQ 0o ©oQm ®�E�vtQ �m�O© ®�ooQ O�ooQ� �ooQ m ®moo °oo ® ©oQ wQS•��oQ� ��ooQ O�ooQ 0m 0�ov� ©oQ� ®�ooQ ®moo© ®��oQ ®mooQ� mMO. Mmo mmzmmmm a © mmmg=aoo© ©� iL7 ®0OQ Q- Om�OQ oOOQ� 00�OQ� ®�ooQ ���ooQ� 5000 "T""�Er•i�v - O���OQ 0�o0Q ®�O�Q moo �ODOQm 0m�o°Q 000Q� • Q".,W,w000� O 0mo �ooQ� 0 °o© Imo oo ©oQ� �c�maQ� OooQ� a Kmz©Q �000Q� INIUMENOL 0moo ©� rac�mm�ororiar�� oOOQ� o�oQ� 00ao� 'NOW mw�w��0© w- ^-woOQ� Q� ®moQfQ� o mmooQ- UnUm . OQ•0 ©� ic:aw �i��7oQ1Q� 0m ©OQ� 000OQ�' ®mOOQ oOOQ� �ooQ� �� ©oQ � oQQ�w �,7�'T�- wQ•OQ� ooQ� �mowty� OooQ� �m ©oQ� 01L- r--wvi�E�� ©� Q�O�OQ� moo Omo�Q mOOQ� ��wmQQ� mooQ� �m000m moo© OQfO 0m�oom 0wr'^�000� f�iDOOQ� ®oQ� 0�. -��Q� 10�1002'-73=0 - � �� ©orwrrw� mooQQ� mo0� O�OQe vv ©® In � to � The Waters Senior living of Edina � o�' COLON/AL CHURCH EDINA, MN Tn.. N....1... TM MimAwr Inn Nimhw G.��i�e 8 x oo x Z o tA' W� C ,V , o$o o8U CL O a UsY Im o C 700 p C ym2 N ` N .2 CE z °1 ? uj —t=ip W F= 0_ � n m G � o is ff o N raw® ©Q� ��,.r•-�ooQ� �smooQ� ®�rdrrw O�ooQ� moo O�ooQ� Q� ZZAZ ow � �omQQ� ®000Q�� ��m000 �o�tss■c�ss�■ '�OQ•0� ®mooQ� ®mooQ� �S'QE�OQ� ®D00 �OOQ ©® �0 ®O® iQiQ�7�00� _ �D000� �c7�7Q•OQ� ®OQ•OQ- ���oov� 000Q� 0o ©oQm ®�E�vtQ OomoQ� ®�ooQ O�ooQ� �ooQ ®moo °oo ooQ� wQS•��oQ� ��ooQ 0�ov� ®�ooQ ®moo© ®��oQ ®mooQ� Mmo ®moo �000Q� ©� Q- oOOQ� 00�OQ� ®�ooQ ���ooQ� 5000 "T""�Er•i�v - O���OQ 0�o0Q mom= moo �ODOQm 000Q� • Q".,W,w000� O ®o�oQ� �ooQ� oo ©oQ� �c�maQ� OooQ� a �oioQ� �000Q� INIUMENOL oOOQ� o�oQ� 'NOW w- ^-woOQ� Q� ®moQfQ� o UnUm . OQ•0 ©� ic:aw �i��7oQ1Q� 000OQ�' ®mOOQ oOOQ� �ooQ� �000Q� �,7�'T�- wQ•OQ� ooQ� �mowty� OooQ� 000 ©� Q�O�OQ� moo �omoQ� mOOQ� ��wmQQ� mooQ� moo© OQfO 00�OQ� f�iDOOQ� ®oQ� �omoo� mooQQ� mo0� O�OQe vv ©® Mum mmmOQ� 0m0oQ� OOQ� 8 x oo x Z o tA' W� C ,V , o$o o8U CL O a UsY Im o C 700 p C ym2 N ` N .2 CE z °1 ? uj —t=ip W F= 0_ � n m G � o is ff o N raw® ©Q� ��,.r•-�ooQ� ��w,�ws ®�rdrrw O�ooQ� moo O�ooQ� Q� ZZAZ ow � �omQQ� ®000Q�� ��m000 �o�tss■c�ss�■ '�OQ•0� ®mooQ� ®mooQ� �S'QE�OQ� ®D00 ©® �0 ®O® _ �D000� �OOQ 000Q� 0o ©oQm ®�E�vtQ OomoQ� ®�ooQ O�ooQ� �ooQ ®moo °oo ooQ� ��ooQ 0�ov� ®�ooQ ®��oQ ®mooQ� Mmo ®moo OomoQ� ©� Q- oOOQ� 00�OQ� ®�ooQ ���ooQ� 5000 "T""�Er•i�v - O���OQ 0�o0Q 0000Q- moo 000Q� • Q".,W,w000� O �ooQ� oo ©oQ� OooQ� a �oioQ� INIUMENOL o�oQ� 'NOW w- ^-woOQ� Q� ®moQfQ� o UnUm . Q��ooQ� ic:aw �i��7oQ1Q� 000OQ�' ®mOOQ oOOQ� �ooQ� �000Q� �,7�'T�- wQ•OQ� ooQ� �mowty� OooQ� 000 ©� �o000� moo O000Q� mOOQ� �oaoQ� mooQ� moo© OQfO 00�OQ� ®oQ� mmooQ� mooQQ� mo0� vv ©® 0m0oQ� 8 x oo x Z o tA' W� C ,V , o$o o8U CL O a UsY Im o C 700 p C ym2 N ` N .2 CE z °1 ? uj —t=ip W F= 0_ � n m G � o is ff o N O�ooQ� ®000Q�� ��m000 '�OQ•0� ®mooQ� �S'QE�OQ� smug= �0 ®O® _ �OOQ ®�E�vtQ ®�ooQ O�ooQ� �ooQ ®moo °oo ��ooQ ®�ooQ ®��oQ ®mooQ� Mmo ®moo ©� Q- ®�ooQ ���ooQ� i�:�w "T""�Er•i�v 0�o0Q moo Q�mm O mm a �oioQ� INIUMENOL o�oQ� 'NOW mm Q� ®moQfQ� o UnUm . Q��ooQ� ic:aw �i��7oQ1Q� ®mOOQ �ooQ� �,7�'T�- wQ•OQ� �mowty� moo ©� mOOQ� mooQ� moo© OQfO 8 x oo x Z o tA' W� C ,V , o$o o8U CL O a UsY Im o C 700 p C ym2 N ` N .2 CE z °1 ? uj —t=ip W F= 0_ � n m G � o is ff o N ��m000 ®mooQ� smug= _ ®�E�vtQ ®�ooQ �ooQ ®moo °oo ��ooQ ®�ooQ ®��oQ ®mooQ� Mmo ®moo ©� ®�ooQ i�:�w "T""�Er•i�v 0�o0Q Q�mm O mm a �oioQ� o�oQ� mm o UnUm . Q��ooQ� ic:aw ®mOOQ mOOQ� mooQ� moo© 8 x oo x Z o tA' W� C ,V , o$o o8U CL O a UsY Im o C 700 p C ym2 N ` N .2 CE z °1 ? uj —t=ip W F= 0_ � n m G � o is ff o N 5 1i c ,iO Ch"'ch u E i,- M. 55-3�� MI 7_3 I'll ST ADDITION 6�41 vI, i I ii 7 00 • mw -E- h, T41 pv THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING P-Wr IWAS"W WN' PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SITE DEMOLITION PLAN THEWATERS F sTA 3077-001-00 OF EDINA I AS SHOWN SENIOR LIVING ..... ... .. ...... .. .. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus -ICA? 17 Diiiimitmbw 23. 2009 ... ....... of The Colonial Church of Edina C 10 7'. REVISIQU,�"Q Y - THE SHEEr WN C200 DEMOLITION NOTES: UTILITY CONTACTS KEY NOTES LEGEND THE GOPHER STAN- if UAL_ S'ITLV 4 I 8D-- 2116E. 48 HOURS IRI�R TC PERFORMING ANY CARE MUST BE TAKEN DURINI2 ONSTRU,1IJN TO PRDT--- SUN�, MONUMENTS AND IEPOPEFHf IRONS <=PIRCITECT SI-T FENCE EXCAVATION. 6 PROTF:- ALL TREES NOT SP CIR,.ALL- DESIGNATED FOR. REMOVA. I ILI'" 11 'I'll I'll"' ANDREW BAL308IN QSCUT PAVEMEN- X' X REMUVm FREE, /SHRUB 1. EXISTING UNDEROPOLIME UTILITIES AR- SHOWN A- AEPPOIMATE LOCA DNS. AL- -XISTJNG �UUTES MA'. NO- B- SHOWN, PRIDE TC fr. SAWCJT PAVEMENT THA7 REMAINS AT REMOVA.. LIIMIT<_. 61 2-3.11-542f ANDREW.BALCOBINOCENTERPLNNTENERC,",�'OM <="DCRDINATF REMCVA-/PnLOCATON OF COMM)NICATOI, CJNSTRUC.TJA FIE.r TtRIF' LOCATION OF UTILITIES THAT MA) K OR NERG•' JTIUTI WITH UDUTY CC'. REMOII= CURB IMDA= 21 CONSTRUCTION. IC RESTO E OR REPAIR DAMAGED ROADS, WALKS, -URES. I)TILIFTES. OF._P,ANT MATERIALS TO CONDITION EQUAL TC OR BLTTEP THAN 2 COMCA KELLY DOONAK ��NEIMOVE -XISTING STRUCTURE x- -X- x- REMO1-- L/ ',UK 11DIt- PROM TEMPORARY P:1, CONSTRUCTION EXIT IT A,- -OCATIONS -R OONSTRUCTION CONDFION AND AS, REQUIRE' D- IWNER. 9 4QREmOvE Sim WHFR= CONi MJIT*h TRAF-1- ENTERS �IRLI RCADWA• �51-607-4031 FULI-DOONANOCABLE,ODMCAST.COM PAV--MEN- V COORDINATE DISRUPTION O= JTLUT• SERIAC-3 WITH DINNER LIMIT <MREMCA U�- -01= 4. STORM SwWEP BALE _INLETS MUST BE DPOTECTEE WITH SILT FEN�E. CHS, OR �TH EQUIVALENT ME74XS JNTIL PERMANENT r,% SEWE DISRUPTION TO TIM =3 APPRQI�C EU* CARRIE- 3� QwUS1 MARK HIEMM S^H <=EUU,HEAL EXISTING PIPE AT RLMOVA- JWT5 C,1 -NE SQV�6 15 S.-AULSHUL 5. P OMDE - RAFT ". - :JNTR-D 11. A-ORDAN- W- THE MINNE>OTA E'--a61-8175 MAR:.HEMMFS,,H&OWEST.COV <17]R-MOVE DRIVE APRON TR-1 11�ECION MANJAL 0-- INI�ORM TRA-K IONIP•X D- 'US. NC PQIN•_ THE T MPORA+' Tl, -D,E LAI'-)_IS =,NLP ",_. DA "_'N C XC_- NERCI: Disn, HO.Sl CT]REMUVE -,UR� AN- WALI, A- ��W IP'Vz AP�CE .ANUAP.'- 2007, �- -IMES -HA- -JN`RUCTIDAI AIA-'. 9 2-aZ9-4571 DISR1. , IR.==, UN oJH P , D.AYS. DUSTIN.HORt2SIM E,FNER6,COM 6. 3RD11A- D';--,VF ADI, •._ -- ZR - AND —1CJLA' IRA, 0- • )z :DIN. WTA •.OL ON A ' JPCH. OE-AIN - RED IIF`D SW AN- R G= G-ANZ-- ,,DEWA-, CL,SJRE -ERMiT.i - CON-A:- CIT.' =C VERIF• S REQOIREMFNIS. 953- 026-C3 THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING P-Wr IWAS"W WN' PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SITE DEMOLITION PLAN THEWATERS F sTA 3077-001-00 OF EDINA I AS SHOWN SENIOR LIVING ..... ... .. ...... .. .. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus -ICA? 17 Diiiimitmbw 23. 2009 ... ....... of The Colonial Church of Edina C 10 7'. REVISIQU,�"Q Y - THE SHEEr WN C200 4. 31 ,cion,al C-h-ch of Edinc 6E'�n0 nc.`U`N5-511*3-P p. P-1 (Single Dwehin•� unit District, PID Nc O�-116-21-?'-0005 0 0 COLON AY [L2 A - - .. ..... ... ... ZONING REQUIREMENTS SATE ADDRE-5: OLONtl A'. EIA11 'F1)`)SED CS- SENIDIR --N- A-A I- I IN,, AcSSUE M-MOR. S'. TE �- : M- Sw �R 5.2? A:Rzv, FLOOR ARLI RATc CROSE ROOF, hIE-4 U.— R. P_It TMC ,_MR Dx .- D-- S, uIMMW SETBAZV IREOUIRNEN- 35' FELON'. SIDE, R- 1'ARD4, ,E-- WNI UV ANDSCA--- AREA. 5--- 'Of, MOD -ANDS:APw KOIJI-PN'S - �R-LA N.I-C:4 5.655 3; ;ANDS�A� -1-0- .113 INQ7 el R-DOPEZ -MACIS LISZC- -' 3-h-•- R76' 20• j :70: GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT: PAWNG SUMMARY SITE LAYOUT PLAN 11115, OF EDINA DOLE AC!E3S 3077-001-00 AS SHOWN FA�. I)[ LURE UNLESS uTHLRWS7 NOTED. RA'CE OF WK IS ADA STALLS SENIOR LIVING' Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus TM ALL' 5-INCHES BEHIND THE WALE OF CURE. STALLS MANHOLE .......... GARA( STAIL-S tpC 0AICHEASIN/INL17 RFVTSTON HTSTORY ........ ...... ... .... . . . .. ........ .. ..... HYDRANT L. AXIIA I SPACING O CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE TRAFEIC ID CO-110,1T —EL GREEN AND .......... WATER V&V_ 5 PROPOSED BUILDING tt v. FY. ELEV 869.0 SOI- BORING LOCATION We CR•IUNC ELEVATION L.L. ELEV. 858.0 - --------------- --- SINGLE SIGN -AL. ... ....... �%PANSI-11 JOIN- __E,__ A - - .. ..... ... ... ZONING REQUIREMENTS SATE ADDRE-5: OLONtl A'. EIA11 'F1)`)SED CS- SENIDIR --N- A-A I- I IN,, AcSSUE M-MOR. S'. TE �- : M- Sw �R 5.2? A:Rzv, FLOOR ARLI RATc CROSE ROOF, hIE-4 U.— R. P_It TMC ,_MR Dx .- D-- S, uIMMW SETBAZV IREOUIRNEN- 35' FELON'. SIDE, R- 1'ARD4, ,E-- WNI UV ANDSCA--- AREA. 5--- 'Of, MOD -ANDS:APw KOIJI-PN'S - �R-LA N.I-C:4 5.655 3; ;ANDS�A� -1-0- .113 INQ7 el R-DOPEZ -MACIS LISZC- 0 3G 60 WALL IN FEF- -' 3-h-•- LEGEND j GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT: PAWNG SUMMARY SITE LAYOUT PLAN I AL LlVLNSIONS TO CURES ANC CLR61OUTTER ARE TO THE OF EDINA DOLE AC!E3S 3077-001-00 AS SHOWN FA�. I)[ LURE UNLESS uTHLRWS7 NOTED. RA'CE OF WK IS ADA STALLS SENIOR LIVING' Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus TM ALL' 5-INCHES BEHIND THE WALE OF CURE. STALLS MANHOLE '�UIDLJN" %OR CONSTRUCTION OE NEW CONCIR_Tm SJRACING: GARA( STAIL-S tpC 0AICHEASIN/INL17 RFVTSTON HTSTORY -1 11AIIIIIJI 3PICINI. CONTROL JOINTS IN WA KS IC 37 , 'E=7,8-,T GENERAL L, MATC- THE Wk 1. VDTH HYDRANT L. AXIIA I SPACING O CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE TRAFEIC ID CO-110,1T —EL GREEN AND SLABS TO BE 12-'EET. WATER V&V_ DO AkMUW 3FACNG J-' /Z -114 - EAFANSON X1147S TJ 3E tt v. 4' -11 T C. ALIGN JON'S W.1- WA., CORN - °.S. H0R,ZDN-.AL DEFLELTIDNS. SOI- BORING LOCATION We CR•IUNC ELEVATION .UILD,N. CORNERS, Ell ANC LS= EXIAL -NU SIZES ti 0 3G 60 WALL IN FEF- LEGEND THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT: PAWNG SUMMARY SITE LAYOUT PLAN I AL LlVLNSIONS TO CURES ANC CLR61OUTTER ARE TO THE OF EDINA DOLE AC!E3S 3077-001-00 AS SHOWN FA�. I)[ LURE UNLESS uTHLRWS7 NOTED. RA'CE OF WK IS ADA STALLS SENIOR LIVING' Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus TM ALL' 5-INCHES BEHIND THE WALE OF CURE. STALLS MANHOLE '�UIDLJN" %OR CONSTRUCTION OE NEW CONCIR_Tm SJRACING: GARA( STAIL-S tpC 0AICHEASIN/INL17 RFVTSTON HTSTORY -1 11AIIIIIJI 3PICINI. CONTROL JOINTS IN WA KS IC 37 , 'E=7,8-,T GENERAL L, MATC- THE Wk 1. VDTH HYDRANT L. AXIIA I SPACING O CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE TRAFEIC ID CO-110,1T —EL GREEN AND SLABS TO BE 12-'EET. WATER V&V_ AkMUW 3FACNG J-' /Z -114 - EAFANSON X1147S TJ 3E 4' -11 T C. ALIGN JON'S W.1- WA., CORN - °.S. H0R,ZDN-.AL DEFLELTIDNS. SOI- BORING LOCATION We CR•IUNC ELEVATION .UILD,N. CORNERS, Ell ANC LS= EXIAL -NU SIZES e. SEE X::/XX =!R JOINTING D= TAILS. SINGLE SIGN -AL. �%PANSI-11 JOIN- __E,__ ',0NIP.01- JfjJN- 'ONT-7 HIM!- T"• P.O.W. THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING I - IOAT 01H EIlpl�e �WA�E'4 L, �If -0 T - IN'— , PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SITE LAYOUT PLAN THEWATERS OF EDINA 3077-001-00 AS SHOWN SENIOR LIVING' Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus / D4 December 23, 213109 C300 of The Colonial Church of Edina RFVTSTON HTSTORY - RAAAIT qHFFr ID CO-110,1T —EL GREEN AND SURFACING LEGEND LEGEND EARTHWORK NOTES: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUMMARY: -NNf ' SE- SPEJFICATION SECTlCk 310000 EARTHWORK. 51r AREA. - 6" ACRE: - - I+. >.V1 Dl:- I _ OT ^3W: - _ ". IMPERVIOIC AREA BEFORE eRO.C" R -ACRES _ BIIJMINOJS BI.. NOh -w-AR CJUR5_ :MN /DO 2761` 3 Ax Rg GAT= BAS. AS` 5 (MN,TX+ F %'cRNO IND -+ :]NTryIF -------- . __ ----- FIELD VERFY LTILIT• LOCATIONS PRIOR TC CONSTRUCTION. UNDERUROUND UTNTIES AR SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS- IMPERNq,1S AREA AFTER RROJE,. = 3D -ACRES 211 Ex "RNC. CUNTOJP ... .. _. UOU:_ THE GOPHER STATE ONE GALL SI$TEN AT '- 80C- 25' -Ii6E, 48 HOURS PRIOR TC PERFORMING AN PEAL. DI iCNARGES• BEFOR -: CN -73. TL -30 MIN. O! -3. CF ()—Q.2cf, Oleo- 16.6cis LN;N - -JUTY BI "JMINO'JS i.5' 3:T. NEAR COJRSE ;MN /DC- 2-360: 1.5° B•1. NON -NEAP CQVKSE IMN/DOI F %STING CONTOJ% (RDMO:<D� - E%OA.VATION AFTEF: CN -79. T: -10 MIN. t -9 -fa Oi�2L.2,D, Q-32.&I, .: eA �:MN:'OE Ix, /DETENTION ROUTIN: = Q-1 -2 0-7 20. O,m- 1'.5cra ,Ok =GA.*= BAS- - C_ACC ', S -0 c_EVATIUN t:,.a <, SEE SHE`:- .0100 SITE SURVEY FOP. BENOHMARF. =. HWr -B51 "' HNIr -E".:' HWIOO- 863.C' _?11:I # .. SKI EL_V TONS ARE TYPCALLI GIVEN AT FINISHEC SURRACE ' >TORAG °_ VOLUM C.G3C .W n C.4e3 .c-r 0'39 Ae _T P4x�MENT I N.O. PPO°CSF .. JTnIIPS '^' h'vYAL' IIS' - AT TO° . CJRB ELEVATION'3 ARE NGTEC WT•- A "Tr" WATER IXAL TY VOLIJMELWyV' _ IF-o �' IN OK' IN - - NUN i LDW=<- BJILDIN F'.O'>P ELEVATION MUS- BE SET :. F-- ABOVE 0ry -Tb. ° -2.5' R. C.B -' nti_MENT f 4 ,.RE ..7E BASE DPaN .,E THE •IN- MILE .FEr� IO. -YEAR FLOM 7 VA'IJN OF E6o C— E -T. P'O`JIR -D WOV � F ACRE- x 0.84" : 1R,�O( C. P -VET 3^ANJLA- SUB'ORAJ= ' A DQA '�F.T- E✓ALJATIJN RE°ORT W. C)mP EE, 31 vROADED WOV Nom 642 :' 1, bav: I JO -'.F. .:HN':A BPAUI N1ER1E; .ORPORANUN JAT-C D'-DB 0U9 THI_ "xl SIT" R T___....__.- SNTInN V?_LA_ ' (�"LR =T= P Iv RAF - MA REP,1F OCAJAIN: INFORMATION ON SITE SOIL' ROUNDWATEV ANC RcOUIREU VOLUME 30 ACk�S .: "' 1C b5 -- WA " 9 4 "'RE FIE BASE PE•.]IAM-NR <RCh= -6• CJI: i J.IIq, A_TINTI_5 ..-NEa ALL '1E THS N1 -L B- PP,VIDF: IN BI•: F' TPATION APEAS .A7JA(N =' TO PANN' P ^F,Ef • -,i.4N )LA $UBuPAJ- CJN1P.aI;T UM'S T:. S1E SOIL'_ :ONSIST OF 4 HIGH_• VARI.4B - LAYER •." �L_ C'VE? !IAG A— DEPOSIT -._ 52-x_ °. FIL_ SDI -$ 7ER- NCB E?Il AJERE =_OO= .STOFAGE. t5£.O' T= BE -OZ C AJE- HT OVEP.LAIRNG THE 1ACIA- SCI -1 ON THE EAST °OF11JN OF 18 ACRE - --T THE SOILS AR= VARIAB_= ANC CONSIST 0= FO'JP_` ;;PAGE =• SANG. P•OO - :•AATI SAND W71- SILT. SL' SAND, C Ar' SANS. SANC LEA ^I '.IA 1, -EAN :?.Y. AN= SAN--f SILT ( THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING NEREEI CER'PT "` °"` '- - PRELIMINARY SITE G NG, RY DEVELOPMENT GRADING, DRAINAGE, T H EWA T E R S SENIOR LIVING' ..I a.P...H.4, O.0 Ma 'a"4..a. aa. n.....aa.. M.. OF EDINA Proposcd Scnior Housing on the Campus ; — MM I <J. "r — 0„ -WT_W AS SHOWN AND SURFACING PLAN r "" Doom baF 23 2005 C400 of The Colonial Church of Edina IRaTUn NJMB =; R.wAfT ?. -I .. nil P-1 1q LP'. EI t11(t; PI- N. " - "1E 21- 21 -OOC` J � ht no -�_ \ (D Q - i i, F\ STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SCHEDULE ST/ RIM NV. OUT NOTE Slit np x x x x - -- . ST/4 05LOO NY. -050= '.. VERIFY BUILDING STORM. SANITARY. AND WATER. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND STNS 050.00 W.-SWAG • TRACY AVE COIN5IRIICT OVER ST/6 052.00 MV.-056A0 cam lY SAN. ST(7 BMW Nv. -050.30 kDUIREMENTS, STNS 057.00 Ntl..050A0 ST0 057.30 1N. -05L40 x STpO 567.00 Nv. -e61W 07.0 Nv. 054!0 5Tp4 _ 07.40 NV. -054.20 STS x - STD O x x 613.0 STIN 6510 /NIT. -056= x STR! OBLOO ESN. -BMW SrP3 05COD 11.-0511 -SO STORM SEWER STRUCIUIE5 SCHEDULE STO RM NY. BUT NOTE ST674 STRO 661.30 656.70 NV. -BUA NV. -05L70 - - - STp1 8WOO 110 -652.00 '.. VERIFY BUILDING STORM. SANITARY. AND WATER. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND 87I67 666.30 NV. -053.20 • TRACY AVE COIN5IRIICT OVER TM 29.1 G % - _ 20 y 4. PROVIDE MINIMUM _ +' COVER ON ALL WATERMAD13 AL WATERM N N ow cam lY SAN. NEW W< R 1 1 1 1 :. SWITAR' ANO STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ML'1 COM ° -` WITH CITI kDUIREMENTS, Si STAM 4WW -66LW _ - Nv. -056= I NV -OIL20 -- SYP2 x CATCIBA5I14 WIT 5TR1; ,^,- IRE S° `- STW 07.0 Nv. 054!0 5Tp4 _ 07.40 NV. -054.20 STS x - ST/3I 613.0 W..- STJV x - tenon. -lun - Ate. �N. _X ST/31 - 7 FORCEM TO MMV r ` /I4 1F g1B� - r V. OUT NOTE IN-A I0-0 607-0 007.0 1 I SANITARY LFT STATNIN -- -- - \ Y • PROPOSED BUILDING, V F.F. ELEV 889.0 L.L. ELEY. 858.0 '.. VERIFY BUILDING STORM. SANITARY. AND WATER. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND srls 07102 Dry. -057.0* • TRACY AVE COIN5IRIICT OVER TM 29.1 G % - _ 20 y 4. PROVIDE MINIMUM _ +' COVER ON ALL WATERMAD13 AL WATERM N N ow SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES SCHEDULE ST6 RIM V. OUT NOTE IN-A I0-0 607-0 007.0 INV.-652.0 INV -670.7 SANITARY LFT STATNIN -- -- - k1 -C 00623 NY. -0561 '.. VERIFY BUILDING STORM. SANITARY. AND WATER. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND 101-0 07102 Dry. -057.0* • TRACY AVE COIN5IRIICT OVER 4. PROVIDE MINIMUM _ +' COVER ON ALL WATERMAD13 AL WATERM N N7* ;T3W S=W -? cam lY SAN. NEW W< R 1 1 1 1 :. SWITAR' ANO STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ML'1 COM ° -` WITH CITI kDUIREMENTS, - COORDINATE ::ri1JNEL'NJNS 'C _ +'S "IN',: UTIL "'i S•'STEMS W1'H _'11 -1 "` :`WN.F. IJ4I.HCLE N'ITH - ?J.'TI;R= - '. SEE TABLE FJR OTILIT- STRU: TUR -- IWORMAPON. B. A ,sT A- CyzTINGS T; EL- tiATgf, I14-INCF 5 -?k WISH -P SUR %M` =. CATCIBA5I14 WIT 5TR1; ,^,- IRE S° `- F , y —` ST110 T H EWA T E R S THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA SENIOR LIVING' ... Proposed Scnior Housing on the Campus :........_.,..., ....... of The Colonial Church of Edina NT am UTILITY NOTES: LEGEND 1, UTILI_- THE GOPHER STATE ONE CAL. SYSTEM a ;R01:; ::7-'1156. 48 HOURS PRIOR. TO PERFORMING ANY EX AVATION. EXI;Twe tNIITAP' iEWEc' - - - - - - - - - - ^_. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN A- APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. ALL t T o EXISTING. UTILITIES MAr NOT 8= SHOWN. 'JERIF' UO TION AND ELEVATION OF EAST- STORM SEWS. ----- - - - - -- _ EYI_.TwG W.A.TEF -- '.. VERIFY BUILDING STORM. SANITARY. AND WATER. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH PLUMBING CONiRACTOP., PRIOR TO CONSTRUTIM 0- SERVIC_ N =W SAHITAP` SLWEF LINE'_. 4. PROVIDE MINIMUM _ +' COVER ON ALL WATERMAD13 AL WATERM N N7* ;T3W S=W -? CONSTRUC701 MUD COMP_' WITH OI1" REOUIREWNTS. NEW W< R 1 1 1 1 :. SWITAR' ANO STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ML'1 COM ° -` WITH CITI kDUIREMENTS, - COORDINATE ::ri1JNEL'NJNS 'C _ +'S "IN',: UTIL "'i S•'STEMS W1'H _'11 -1 "` :`WN.F. IJ4I.HCLE N'ITH - ?J.'TI;R= - '. SEE TABLE FJR OTILIT- STRU: TUR -- IWORMAPON. B. A ,sT A- CyzTINGS T; EL- tiATgf, I14-INCF 5 -?k WISH -P SUR %M` =. CATCIBA5I14 WIT 5TR1; ,^,- IRE S° `- F , y —` ST110 NT am UTILITY NOTES: LEGEND 1, UTILI_- THE GOPHER STATE ONE CAL. SYSTEM a ;R01:; ::7-'1156. 48 HOURS PRIOR. TO PERFORMING ANY EX AVATION. EXI;Twe tNIITAP' iEWEc' - - - - - - - - - - ^_. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN A- APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. ALL EXISTING. UTILITIES MAr NOT 8= SHOWN. 'JERIF' UO TION AND ELEVATION OF EAST- STORM SEWS. ----- - - - - -- URUTIES IMPACTED BY CONSTRUC110h, PRIOR TO PLACING NEW -IRE OR UTIUT" STRUCTURES. EYI_.TwG W.A.TEF -- '.. VERIFY BUILDING STORM. SANITARY. AND WATER. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH PLUMBING CONiRACTOP., PRIOR TO CONSTRUTIM 0- SERVIC_ N =W SAHITAP` SLWEF LINE'_. 4. PROVIDE MINIMUM _ +' COVER ON ALL WATERMAD13 AL WATERM N N7* ;T3W S=W -? CONSTRUC701 MUD COMP_' WITH OI1" REOUIREWNTS. NEW W< R 1 1 1 1 :. SWITAR' ANO STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ML'1 COM ° -` WITH CITI kDUIREMENTS, - COORDINATE ::ri1JNEL'NJNS 'C _ +'S "IN',: UTIL "'i S•'STEMS W1'H _'11 -1 "` :`WN.F. IJ4I.HCLE N'ITH - ?J.'TI;R= - '. SEE TABLE FJR OTILIT- STRU: TUR -- IWORMAPON. B. A ,sT A- CyzTINGS T; EL- tiATgf, I14-INCF 5 -?k WISH -P SUR %M` =. CATCIBA5I14 WIT 5TR1; ,^,- IRE S° `- HY_R �aLV_ - PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SITE UTILITY PLAN __ - / M•.+ i.- 3077- 001 -00 \ AS SHOWN - -- -r -- December 23, 2009 STON HTSTORY - THTS SHFFT �� °�" R.WNT �� OO s S a R G I ............. JCM 20 MANEY AWIPER i! MR ASSHOWN . ' �:-- .3 ?tr;`"Rt ,�`•gDl- D: \F�t °Iles .loge lo= .,.L,..L.n I ..9..., .9 I ....,.9 1. ALL TS SIWL BE PLANTED WITH BARN MUMH• U.N.O. NOFP. f iA -T'Tr K,V` JNB arc AAxxryR 11 BLUE PRNCE AINIPER 15 C AS SHOWN Z ALL RAMS SHALL HAVE SPADED EDGE - mP„,: no-van•w 9wn PmKo E.SPASSOV V DEPTH UA.O. i•,: C,o PI:HT HAMMR GREFI, MD ABRAHALI -,. i. ! HUGHES JUNIPER JLUESTAJUNIPE HuZMS b MR AS SHOWN 3. ALL PWf15 SHALL RE IRMCATFD. JSB SY BLUE STAR JUNIPER E CTNR AS SHOWN 1. ALL SFAS WITHIN THE PROPERLY 11Hf JCS JEA GREEN NA'Bu S✓ 19 SEA GREEN PER E MR AS SHOWN O WT SIMTIYN AS SSES WILL BE SEEDED WffH M1TNE GRAS SBO Uv rpv<AUwis S.•G,wr.' 159 GO_DFLAME SPREA p C1NR AS SHOWN SPRe• s 9M9ifH GOWYm•' LEGEND: SN S2 SNMMI— IDSPR_P SPUR® "I"M S,wRNUrM' C MR AS SHOWN AREA 10 BE SODDED SVR SMP 32 VANHOUT'EI RENAISSANCE SPIREA —B w EAN Rm imm. 40 DWARF _. N -LRAC K iE MR AS SHOWN CTNR AS SHOWN SPEW 3yrripR mWY N LIS-n' SO LIUC i! C1NR AS SHOWN I� WW C SQ IWYMAN S P ATAWEM•Om•AY WNUM Z+ COMPACT AMERCANV R AS SHOWN VLUmum fnbEUm BI/IY Lonpxl' C.wf TIC WATERS SENIOR LIVING HEiEE, CC'^ 1 'Mr. > T ` ,T �^ = yy - �J PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN . ' �:-- .3 ?tr;`"Rt ,�`•gDl- D: \F�t °Iles .loge lo= .,.L,..L.n I ..9..., .9 I ....,.9 OF EDINA NOFP. f iA -T'Tr K,V` UAM 1 3077-001-00 ,.�, Mme•. Vw .nl 9lnMYU, ue. 1•R 1., ...... m. •. R. 999 Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus The Colonial Church Edina Dxamber z zoos °kAM L201 of of E.SPASSOV i•,: C,o PI:HT HAMMR GREFI, MD ABRAHALI -,. i. GKUUNU LtVtL LAU UUIL1Nt FLAN 4`J,x/3:o Jr 1132--l'-O- GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN NEaEm c an n T� PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT GROUND LEVEL REPORT WA. PREP NDER -� THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING SuUOENISION E T "A - THE T H EWA T E R S ' "` " FLOOR PLAN OF EDINA .1 307- 0°1 —°° SENIOR LIVING- •••• _• •• ••••�• suk x I,.., u.. ,. ..... ........... ..... Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus 0° Dom bs 23, i5C 200 of The Colonial Church of Edina R e: TaN NUMBER: RF1/1SinN HiST(1RY - THiS SFIFFf KJENSEN /1 i 1 4 I I MAIN LEVEL CAD OUTLINE PLAN 55,993 SF 00 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN a. ln�7N� ¢acm "a�Ri� PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT MAIN LEVEL afroar wa, rM "Er ` THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING wCEN5E5 NN - T T H EWA T E R S "` "N FLOOR PLAN OF EDINA aon- ooi -oo ....,,.. _ __ _ An SENIOR LIVING' •• ••••••• 77 unu .... Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus December 23, 2009 A �O i ;; ...... ,,•,•,,, of The Colonial Church of Edina R E TION Nuuaea: REVISION HIS -THIS SHEET oanwN KJENSEN H 1 I' SECOND LEVEL CAD OUTLINE PLAN 53,787 SF 0 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN /6', -o HEREm cERn �wd.�"° � PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SECOND LEVEL REPORT Wf.: f'RET' T H EWAT E R S THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING LICEHRSVEOS�IO(N�� TE T RN FLOOR PLAN 'As 11NOFR T�Ae1 F HF STAyN OF EDINA `- 1 Son— ool —oo SENIOR LIVING' ..m... «<. .. ,. ..... nnu 1/16^ — 1 _0. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus oecember 23, 2009 A O E: DRAWN H of The Colonial Church of Edina R nN NweER: REVISION HISTORY THIS SHEET KJENSEN THIRD LEVEL CAD OUTLINE PLAN 51,392 SF 1/32-, a- THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN RE!'o� wns "Er � PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT THIRD LEVEL THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING REN5E lON rE T H EWA T E R S ° " °F " %" w ". FLOOR PLAN OF EDINA _/. \•��jCJ "_� a /16" = i -o, SENIOR LIVING' ..... ........ ..... ..... K mber _ �,-0• .. ..... ... Proposed Senior Housing on tllc Campus s December 23, 2009 A �O� oww" H ....�... ,�,.�e���e...... . ,., :.,...., of The Colonial Church of Edina " E' ,ros "uueE ": REVISION HISTORY -THIS SHEET KJENSEN 7 FOURTH LEVEL CAD OUTLINE PLAN 43,869 SF FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/15-1 -° sua"R`m W R ' PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT FOURTH LEVEL E�RVriv °N rREr r T H EWAT E R S THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING ��ENSEp� E FLOOR PLAN t1NflFR F F STAT[N cttuu. v °. OF EDINA `- O3 - s /16" = � -oo SENIOR LIVING' . ". 1/i6' 1' -0' Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus s N e December 23, 2009 A204 °` ...... " " "° " of The Colonial Church of Edina R�noN NUMBER. REVISION HISTORY - THIS SHEET ° "" " KJENSEN 1iii V1, oil. i .n II ii Iii INS j� i �Ar -ENA ■liO �� iv HIV �i �i �f� �i '� ii ii �' �� Ivl� ii �I� ii �I® e� ii � ' ii ii ii � � iii ■I:■ as ii ■■ ii -L ii ii ii ■■ h Flow ii �I� ii ii I �� ii ■■ �� ii NNIEEl�>el NNaNe I�a� ®asa �■ @� g� �® ®® ii ii ii ii NN as No NNaeN r�an -1�,�r YYCN �.N IN ■Iii � ii �I� ii ii �I� ii ■■ �n�!j�'� _ -••__ , -� -- -- -- -- 11IN PRELIMINARY YYmY � W sumo Z =I+ �I PRELIMINARY SOUTH ELEVATION THEATERS SENIOR LIVING' MIPEN ' IBM 1II! PRELIMINARY EAST ELEVATION FDD gNiYD YMIY GM. YXIIE ll.l OR E➢IYI. F1fIQN11 RNY lr1➢.6 °OYN�d115 inn rN.m ro Y.ron m.o sia¢ Yil�liF. NYSSRIFf siva 12'X 24• YMDD•S °Y [.lWl ,mt.�r sab[s swmvm Noes � ounosti PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3077- 001 -00 CID ' 1/16'= V -0' December 23.2009 A400 owwx- KJENSEN e)CCYY"H 14WYEJ. CYEW N NLtR"N -J-C. i �¢a[°r cwnrr n REr°!I� wa, rr¢r ' THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING °" RE r" OF EDINA .. ......... . ...... Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus E: _. °- °- --. ---- of The Colonial Church of Edina o �o- FDD gNiYD YMIY GM. YXIIE ll.l OR E➢IYI. F1fIQN11 RNY lr1➢.6 °OYN�d115 inn rN.m ro Y.ron m.o sia¢ Yil�liF. NYSSRIFf siva 12'X 24• YMDD•S °Y [.lWl ,mt.�r sab[s swmvm Noes � ounosti PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3077- 001 -00 CID ' 1/16'= V -0' December 23.2009 A400 owwx- KJENSEN e)CCYY"H 14WYEJ. CYEW N NLtR"N -J-C. ,SF�_ p p u � I I -- -- ® ® -- - -- QAaC t — — — — — — I_I0_ _= - - - -- -- - -M rM_m_l_ F F M -- -- I -- -- I a i _ i a =— Z �1 PRELIMINARY NORTH ELEVATION �I a THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING- YA911Pir YA9)IR! PRELIMINARY WEST ELEVATION- .. . filD P/MEO YLl9Y CRtY. ' .. iIF3D FlLmmr9 W YPIOI 90010 - 91RC YA9IMOY: - /008SGYif 5101E IP' M PI' MOIED FlNmI, COIeN TIfNPUY . d FtlML. 9I SNIRE BOYO. . YP�01 WIF76 ' YMIE NMR •VOO!i OWIOA IIPIDO\S OP fLWL ' A9iVLi 9PILIfS ' AI�NfxI1PK 9mE5. WNJn OIWCWL R"rroN�r Z r "� PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SUP[RJ510N i I A Y n�• YY. S?' Son- ooi -oo 116• =r_0• ./wy E - "- December 23. 2008 A -.1 0 1 'N `` . NUMB . - - REVISION HISTORY .- THIS 'SH�f. KJFTISEN .. pGO -GNL LL GNFLN ANO ANNAfW1 .INC. THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING I .... OF EDINA ii ii ii I ii 1 ■■ ■■ iu io iii ui of iii e ■ ■I 1 ii 1 ii ii ii ��' .' '� iii ■II ■I ■II■ iil�' I� �I ■ ■I li's ■I ■I ■I■ iil _ YA911Pir YA9)IR! PRELIMINARY WEST ELEVATION- .. . filD P/MEO YLl9Y CRtY. ' .. iIF3D FlLmmr9 W YPIOI 90010 - 91RC YA9IMOY: - /008SGYif 5101E IP' M PI' MOIED FlNmI, COIeN TIfNPUY . d FtlML. 9I SNIRE BOYO. . YP�01 WIF76 ' YMIE NMR •VOO!i OWIOA IIPIDO\S OP fLWL ' A9iVLi 9PILIfS ' AI�NfxI1PK 9mE5. WNJn OIWCWL R"rroN�r Z r "� PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SUP[RJ510N i I A Y n�• YY. S?' Son- ooi -oo 116• =r_0• ./wy E - "- December 23. 2008 A -.1 0 1 'N `` . NUMB . - - REVISION HISTORY .- THIS 'SH�f. KJFTISEN .. pGO -GNL LL GNFLN ANO ANNAfW1 .INC. THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING I .... OF EDINA Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus • • "" " "•" ... of The - Colonial Church of Edina .. YA911Pir YA9)IR! PRELIMINARY WEST ELEVATION- .. . filD P/MEO YLl9Y CRtY. ' .. iIF3D FlLmmr9 W YPIOI 90010 - 91RC YA9IMOY: - /008SGYif 5101E IP' M PI' MOIED FlNmI, COIeN TIfNPUY . d FtlML. 9I SNIRE BOYO. . YP�01 WIF76 ' YMIE NMR •VOO!i OWIOA IIPIDO\S OP fLWL ' A9iVLi 9PILIfS ' AI�NfxI1PK 9mE5. WNJn OIWCWL R"rroN�r Z r "� PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SUP[RJ510N i I A Y n�• YY. S?' Son- ooi -oo 116• =r_0• ./wy E - "- December 23. 2008 A -.1 0 1 'N `` . NUMB . - - REVISION HISTORY .- THIS 'SH�f. KJFTISEN .. pGO -GNL LL GNFLN ANO ANNAfW1 .INC. l � l r p� � \ o /00" p l� ' �o oC / o �1 I The Waters at the Colonial 0 K -o a ° ° Na O O ° O o /0 RT IL 0 p �S J,e• � ti �p' 0 0 6 s 3 N OAF, I / / to Y 0 e � Senior Living Church of Edina of Edina D 6 tl J& W.. PROPOSED TYPE OF LAND USE - PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS - PROPOSED DENSITY - PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL AND /OR PUBLIC BUILDINGS PROPOSED GENERAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT - PROPOSED PARKING AREA - WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAINS AREAS - N INGRESS AND EGRESS POINTS TO SITE - CONCEPT PLAN MULTI- FAMILY 150 APARTMENTS FOR ASSISTED SENIOR LIVING SITE AREA 6.14 ACRES 24.4 APARTMENTS / ACRE 254,976 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FEET 55,993 SQUARE FEET APPROXIMATELY 80 SURFACE PARKING SPACES APPROXIMATELY 100 PARKING SPACES UNDER THE BUILDING INDICATED ON SITE PLAN INDICATED ON SITE PLAN 0 32 64 96 128 23 DECEMBER 2009 ffiA. t L y V x11 4, The WdLers benior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina v .14 to. SITE AERIAL PHOTO OVERLAY 50 image U S Geol6giical SurVe 2009 Europa Technologies 0 0 23 DECEMBER 2009 WA. VIEW LOOKING EAST SHOWING EXISTING VEGETATION The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 A. r I'm ,0< VIEW LOOKING EAST The Waters Senior Living of Edina [fA. at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 VIEW LOOKING SOUTH EAST SHOWING EXISTING VEGETATION The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 Xi .1, All VIEW LOOKING SOUTH EAST 07 Wiix' fr P-7 ioat —Law-- The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 [fA 6 r r r —1i Eli iiii iiii iii i� wi a "u Gs n . 1 I� a ii sa a a ii m Zia- SCHEMATIC RENDERED NORTH ELEVATION The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 A. I - PARTIAL VIEW / SCHEMATIC RENDERED NORTH ELEVATION 11he Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 23 DECEMBER 2009 [-R A �) / 16 / Z)-c 1 0 LO G Y- K- Se ,.'? 2'c vx- 9 1 KE EDINA City Leadership & Bike Edina Task Force Annual Work Session February 16th, 2010 a Time Line of Our Accomplishments �.,, W MY k ad—wp �° T- Farce City Management & Engineering Wbawtla.vpwr. eon }(E First implementations of E D I N A bike lanes, share the road, 1Av idu"r° F °" a0on' Frwrdy .::e idrrWeWn...aieyeM Oanannp Or•Wq Ste. Cara-1Y d..Vra.? 1950s- 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 and beyond 2000 Attitude survey. More bikin9l"kingl Comprehensive Bike Plan wwr:w'..�•a . : WMt $250K pram racaiv.tl F�Iff ®_ U' [ r; n r.,a eaav v iuwrcmnaw nns L Bike Edina Communitv E31KER Includes residents, leaders, elected officials... ODY, r— © I N A • Vision is a progressive bicycle - friendly community where citizens can integrate cycling into their daily lives. 3 i K. 05M, Mission: Implement the approved City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan that supports all levels of bicyclists, connects key destinations including safe routes to schools, and integrates with the Twin Cities' regional bike network. Bike Edina Task Force Accountable to City Manager as BETF Liaison, coordinates each activity (e.g., Safe Routes to Schools, Bike Maps, bike parking, media outreach, etc.) through a City staff sponsor. • Promote safe biking through community outreach and education. • Act as a liaison between the various City departments and the community • Keep informed of the efforts of other communities to promote safe biking or to encourage the broader adoption of bicycling as a form of exercise or as a method of commuting or other travel. • Promote integration of appropriate city, state or national initiatives (e.g. Complete Streets) into Edina's planning for bicycling. Source: BETF Bylaws CitcA ecsr::, Bike Edina Community: 2010 Goals and Objectives Engineering: Share the Road: Additional signs Bike Lanes: More coming Promenade: Completed! Phase I: $250,000 Grant - focus in 2010 Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Support for CP Rail tine Regional Trail Education: - Monthly Edina Skills Rides: Continue - Safe Routes to Schools: Pilot activities - Bike Rodeo: April - Articles, Channel 16- ongoing - Rules of the Road Quiz Encouragement: - Bike Map: New in 20091 Printed 20,000 - Annual Ride with the Mayor and City Council - Annual Ride to the Greenway and other rides Enforcement: - Police Department training (IBMBA) - Police visibility at bike events Evaluation: - Bicycle Traffic Counts: Annual since 2007 Future Surveys? - Recommend to update /amend Bike Plan in 2011 _ti z K t Questions and Answers General questions... • To Council & City Staff: What do you like about our monthly meeting notes? What would you like changed? • Other opportunities, problems or solutions to discuss? If not covered already, time permitting... • What can we expect for "Phase I" project in 2010 (Wayne Houle)? • How will the Statewide Health Improvement Program benefit us in 2010? (Robyn Wiesman to respond) • What is BETF's role in the Nine Mile Creek regional trail project? (Alice Hulbert) • Engineering standards and plans for bicycling, "complete streets" and alignment with county and state approved policies and standards: Summary, opportunities? (Wayne Houle) • Dwaine Lindberg memorial: Integrate with Bicycle Mosaic Public Art project? (Feedback from City Council?) • More information about Safe Routes to Schools (Rob Erickson)? • 2010 Helmet /light giveaway event (Kirk Johnson) • What are the bicycle lane maintenance policies? (Wayne Houle) Others? K 0 r.:ir. N We Value Your Support! Together we are improving our community! T-) !1. T.