The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010-03-16_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MARCH 16, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of March 2, 2010 * II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL `zonal Guard Presentation to Edina Police Department for Their Support of Guard Staff Members & .erves PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 1, 2010 CENSUS 2010 DAY IN EDINA * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES = Regular Meeting of March 2, 2010, Work Session of March 2, 2010 and Closed Session of March 2, 2010 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings, " the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If'you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Ord. No. 2010 -05 Amending Section 850 Front Street Setbacks (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) Agenda/Edina City Council March 16, 2010 Page 2 III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. Change Order Edina Public Works — Improvement PWA, Contract 5C: Unit Masonry * B. Change Order Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 51): Miscellaneous Metal Materials * C. Change Order Edina Public :Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5E: Miscellaneous Metals Installation * D. Change Order Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5M: Accordion Folding Partitions IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Adopt Update To Edina Purchasing Policy B. Resolution No. 2010 -29 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) C. Ordinance No. 2010 -06 Amending' Section 150 Personnel Ordinance Regarding Temporary Seasonal Employees (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote, of four Council Members to pass.) * D. Resolution No. 201,0 -30 Authorizing Application For EAID Grant Funds To Make Two Edina Polling Locations Accessible * E. Resolution 2010 -31 Acknowledging the Phase Improvements of the 1- 494/TH 169 Interchange * F. Traffic Safety Report of March 3, 2010 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment, " the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Asper Pre -List dated March 4, 2010, TOTAL $547,223.35; and Pre -List dated March 11, 2010, TOTAL $2,327,282.94, and Credit Card Transactions dated 1/26/2010 — 2/25/2010 TOTAL: $2,956.40. Agenda/Edina City Council March 16, 2010 Page 3 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Tues Mar 16 Tues Mar 16 Tues Apr 6 Sat Apr 17 Tues Apr 20 Tues Apr 27 Thur Apr 29 Tues May 4 Tues May 18 Tues May 18 Tues May 25 Mon May 31 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGSIDATES /EVENTS Work Session — Housing Programs Updates 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Town Hall Meeting 10:00 A.M. EDINA SENIOR CENTER Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session — to be determined 11:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Volunteer Recognition 5:00 P.M. EDINBOROUGH GREAT HALL Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Work Session — Joint Meeting with Planning Commission 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session — to be determined 7:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 2, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16 2010 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for February 16, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the payment of claims dated February 17, 2010, TOTAL $380.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Executive Director Ow e Cn "y0 \�CORPORP'��/ 1BBB National Guard Presentation to the Edina Police Department No packet -data Z Oral presentation ❑ Information coming ow e,, tr� �kPUFiP' 1800 A PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the goal for the 2010 U. S. Census is to count every person, no matter how difficult or challenging the task may be; and WHEREAS, Minnesota hopes to once again lead the nation in answering the census; and WHEREAS, we recognize the need to count all Minnesotans with a special emphasis on historically undercounted segments of our population; and WHEREAS, the 2010 U. S. Census is vital to the citizens of Minnesota and Edina because it determines the apportionment of seats in the U. S. House of Representatives; and WHEREAS, it is important to have an accurate census count to ensure that the State of Minnesota and its citizens receive their fair share of federal funds; and WHEREAS, an accurate census count provides guidance to policymakers and community leaders as they consider the future needs of our citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina does hereby proclaim April 1, 2010, to be: CENSUS 2010 DAY in the City of Edina and encourage all Edinans to work with the U. S. Census Bureau in order to achieve a full and accurate census. Dated this 16th day of March, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 2, 2010 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, and Mayor Hovland. Member Swenson entered the meeting at 5:12 p.m. Attending from the Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC) were: Chair Arnold Bigbee and Commissioners John Cashmore, Lisa Finsness, Jessica Kingston, RebeFt MaYOF, Dee Were, Meg Newell, and Russ Stanton. Staff attending included: Commissioner Shara Mohtadi entered the meeting at 5:30 p.m. Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Howl, Administration Assistant; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland thanked the HRRC for the work they do on behalf of the community. He asked Chair Bigbee to begin their presentation. Chair Bigbee noted that the Commission was in the process of reviewing nominations for the Tom Oye Award. He said nominations would be received until March 12, 2010. Mr. Bigbee turned the presentation over to Jessica Kingston. Commissioner Kingston presented the proposed draft Domestic Partnership Registration Ordinance that the HRRC requested the City Council to consider. as Barnes #in ParFneFs OF terminn #e their FegistF.,+;,,.,. Ms. Kingston reviewed each section of the draft ordinance plus HRRC's resolutions which request the Edina City Council to: 1. Adopt a Domestic Partnership Ordinance establishing a domestic partnership registry; 2. Assure all Edina public venues include domestic partnerships and their families within existing family or household memberships; 3. Update Edina's Personnel Code Section 150 allowing city employees paid and /or unpaid time off benefits to care for domestic partners; 4. Adopt an "Equal Benefits" ordinance that would require entities contracting with the City to provide equal benefits to spouses and domestic partners of the contractor's employees; and 5. Recognize domestic partner registrations for initial homestead rights and not require annual re- registration for homestead classification for domestic partner homeowners except in the instance of termination of a domestic partner registration. The Council and Commission discussed the proposals in detail. Staff pointed out that a policy change had already been put into place that would eliminate annual re- registrations for homestead classification by domestic partners. It was also noted that before the FMLA Leave Act that required Edina's Code be amended to comply with Federal legislation, the Personnel Code had contained less restrictive language. Manager Hughes said staff would check with the City Attorney to ascertain whether reverting to the less restrictive language posed a conflict with the FMLA Leave Act. Some members of the Council expressed concern with the fourth resolution and requested more information. FeqUiFiRg GGRtFaGt0F6 ef the City to provide derneStiG paFtneFS full beRefits. Mr. Hughes and the City Attorney will review the draft ordinance, staff will review various venues offering family and household memberships, and staff will prepare an update to Section 150 with less restrictive language if not in conflict with FMLA Leave Act. It was noted that the issue relative to the HRRC's fifth resolution had already been rectified. Mr. Hughes said that following any redrafting the proposed ordinance would be returned to the HRRC for their review. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 16, 2010 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 2, 2010 7:04 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. JOHN KEPRIOS COMMENDED Mayor Hovland read in full and presented a plaque inducting Park & Recreation Director Keprios into the United States Specialty Sports Association Hall of Fame. Mr. Keprios described the USSSA's induction ceremony and his administrative .role to promote sport activities. He thanked the Council for its support and recognition. The Council congratulated. Mr. Keprios for this outstanding recognition. �on�tii A \IENUE GAS MAIN RUPTURE UPDATE Fire Chief Scheerer gave an update to the Council on the gas main rupture at in the 5000 block of Arden Avenue that resulted in the loss of the house at 5000 Arden Avenue and extensive damage to the house at 5002 Arden Avenue. damage that en-n-urred to 5002 AFdeR AveRue. Mr. Scheerer advised this was an extremely rare event noting the incident resulted in no personal injuries. He thanked all who had assisted and stated the post- incident analysis would be posted to the City's website. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF FEBRUARY 16, 2010 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the minutes of the regular meeting of February 16, 2010, and work session of February 16, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED — RAKU JAPANESE RESTAURANT, 3939 WEST 50TH STREET, SUITE 100 Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. City Manager Hughes presented the request of Raku Japanese Restaurant, 3939 West 50th Street, for a new on -sale intoxicating liquor license and Sunday on -sale liquor license. He advised the application was in order and recommended for approval. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. Public Testimony Audrey Qien, representing Raku Japanese Restaurant, described the menu that would be offered, noting it was the first Japanese restaurant in Edina and would be opened by early April. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving new on -sale intoxicating liquor license and Sunday on -sale liquor license to Raku, Inc. dba as Raku Japanese Restaurant, for the period beginning March 2, 2010 and ending March 31, 2010. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 2. 2010 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — 2010 FORD CARGO VAN — PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for 2010 Ford cargo van, park maintenance department, to the recommended low bidder, Elk River Ford at $17,989.48. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT PW -10 WELL #6 REHABILITATION Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for Well No. 6 rehabilitation, 5849 Ruth Drive, Contract No. PW 10 -01; Improvement No. WM -504 to the recommended low bidder, Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. at $65,820.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -27 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -27 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -24 ADOPTED — AMENDING COMPOSITION OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION AND PARK BOARD Mr. Hughes stated the amendment would eliminate the dual commissioner status between the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) and Park Board. If adopted, a vacancy would exist on the EEC. The Council discussed the draft ordinance and requested several revisions. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010- 04, an ordinance amending the Edina City Code concerning boards and commissions. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -28 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING HENNEPIN COUNTY YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAM GRANT FOR OUTDOOR HOCKEY RINKS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -28, authorizing the City of Edina to file a Hennepin Youth Sports Program grant application and the execution of final agreements with Hennepin County for the outdoor hockey rinks project. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. ON -SALE INTOXICATING, CLUB ON -SALE, AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR LICENSES RENEWED Mr. Hughes presented the applications requesting renewal of on -sale intoxicating, club on -sale, and Sunday on -sale liquor licenses, noting 60% food sales were required for liquor licenses in Edina. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving club on -Sale and Sunday liquor license renewals for: On -Sale Intoxicating & Sunday Sale - Big Bowl Cafe, California Pizza Kitchen, Crave Restaurant, Eden Avenue Grill, Edina Grill Restaurant, Kozy's Steaks and Seafood, Lake Shore Grill, McCormick & Schmick's Seafood Restaurant, P.F. Chang's Bistro, Raku, Inc., Romano's Macaroni Grill, Ruby Tuesday, Salut Bar Americain, The Cheesecake Factory, Tavern on France, Westin Edina Galleria; and, Club & Sunday Sale — Edina Country Club, Interlachen Country Club Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 2. 2010 WINE LICENSES RENEWED Mr. Hughes presented the applications requesting renewal of on- sale wine and on -sale 3.2 beer license, noting 60% food sales was required for this type of license. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, renewing on -sale wine and on -sale 3.2 beer licenses for the following restaurants: Beaujo's, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Cooks of Crocus Hill, D'Amico & Sons, Good Earth Restaurant, Marriott Residence Inn, Noodles & Company. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. BEER LICENSES RENEWED Mr. Hughes presented the applications for on -sale and off -sale 3.2 beer licenses. . The City Council discussed compliance checks conducted by the Police Department. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving issuance of the following 3.2 beer licenses: On -Sale 3.2 Licenses — Chuck E. Cheese's, Davanni's Pizza/Hoagies, Dino's, TJ's Family Restaurant; and Off -Sale 3.2 Licenses — Cub Foods, DB Convenience LLC (Edina Market & Deli), Holiday Stationstore #217, Jerry's Food, Speedway Superamerica LLC. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPOINTMENT CONFIRMED Mayor Hovland nominated Gene Flicek for appointment to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, confirming the appointment of Gene Flicek to the Zoning Board of Appeals with a term ending February 1, 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *WATER SHUT -OFF AUTHORIZED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett authorizing water shut -off at 6249 Xerxes Avenue South. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET (MARCH 16, 2010) — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -05 AMENDING SECTION 850 FRONT STREET SETBACK Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett setting public hearing date of March 16, 2010, for Ordinance No. 2010 -05 amending Section 850 front street setback. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *TEMPORARY ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE APPROVED — OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett granting temporary beer license to Our Lady of Grace Church for their Lenten fish fry on March 19, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 18, 2010, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $335,842.00; CDBG Fund $96.00; Communications Fund $628.63; Working Capital Fund $55,798.80; Art Center Fund $5,985.62; Golf Dome Fund $18,549.20; Aquatic Center Fund $1,947.68; Golf Course Fund $10,358.84; Ice Arena Fund $18,266.15; Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes Fund $20,584.11; Liquor Fund $138,751.63; Utility Fund $103,839.95; Storm Sewer Fund $14,980.39; Recycling Fund $37,683.00; PSTF Agency Fund $2,118.13; TOTAL $765,430.13 and for approval of payment of claims dated February 22, 2010, and consisting of 20 pages: General Fund $404,814.37; Communications Fund $5,390.26; Working Capital Fund $3,371.81; Art Center Fund $2,351.47; Golf Dome Fund $156.16; Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 2, 2010 Aquatic Center Fund $3,308.75; Golf Course Fund $1,039.65; Ice Arena Fund $2,184.04; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $17,593.20; Liquor Fund $163,820.66; Utility Fund $21,608.80; Recycling Fund $60.44; PSTF Agency Fund $2,555.41; TOTAL $628.255.02. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to adjourn to closed session to discuss labor negotiations. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland adjourned to a closed session held in the Mayor's Conference Room to discuss labor negotiations at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 16, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the March 2, 2010, meeting available. Page 4 1. MINUTES OF THE CLOSED SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 2, 2010 7:45 P.M. Mayor Hovland reconvened the closed session of the Edina City Council at 7:45 p.m. in the Mayor's Conference Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to discuss labor negotiations with the City's various unions. City Manager Hughes briefly outlined the negotiations that have taken place to date. He also reviewed the preliminary 2009 General Fund Year Report. Mr. Hughes stated that based on the preliminary figures he believed the previously suggested budgeted three mandatory furlough days would be unnecessary for 2010. He added the voluntary furlough program would still be offered. The Council discussed with staff the preliminary year end finances, the financial consequences of cancelling the pfeposed mandatory furloughs and the impact such a cancellation might have on negotiating the contracts. Member Housh made a motion to eliminate the mandatory furlough days scheduled for 2010 at the direction of the City Manager based upon the 2009 Year End financial condition of the City. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 16, 2009. Debra Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor F A o e N �yyo \�� 88 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.A From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing — Ord. Setbacks No. 2010 -05 Amending Section 850 Front Street ACTION REQUESTED: First Reading of Ordinance 2010 -05, revising the city's regulations for front street setback requirements in the R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District. If the Council is comfortable with the existing language of the Ordinance, you may waive second reading. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Planning Commission Recommendation: On February 24, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the attached Ordinance Amendment 2010 -05. The Commission recommended several changes that are reflected in the attached Ordinance. The Commission further stated that while the amendment is a quick fix of the existing Ordinance as a result of the lawsuit with JMS, they would like to further consider the possibility of additional changes as part of their overall amendment of the Zoning Ordinance. Vote: 9 Ayes and 0 Nays. ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance 2010 -05 • Planning Commission Staff Reports from January 27, 2010 and February 24, 2010. • Planning Commission minutes from January 27, 2010 and February 24, 2010. o e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague February 24, 2010 2009.0004.10a Director of Planning 30 feet* Coon Rap ids Information & Background As a result of the recent court case with JMS regarding a front street setback variance at 6120 Brookview Avenue, staff is recommending a zoning ordinance amendment to tighten up the existing language for properties in the R -1 zoning district. The variance at 6120 Brookview involved a request to tear down and rebuild a new home on a vacant lot. The Zoning Board of Appeals and City Council denied the variance request; the applicant subsequently sued the city. The decision of the court case was in favor of the applicant due in large part to the judge finding that language in the city regulations regarding front street setbacks to be "ambiguous, vague, conflicting and unworkable." At last month's meeting the planning commission asked staff to bring back a revised ordinance to make the existing language more clear. (See attached revised ordinance in addition to the previously proposed ordinance.) Also, below is a comparison of how other cities regulate front street setback requirements: city Front Street Setback Apple Valley 30 feet Blaine 30 feet Bloomington 30 feet* Coon Rap ids 40 feet Eagan 30 feet Lakeville 30 feet Maple Grove 35 feet Minnetonka 35 feet New Brighton 30 feet ** Plymouth 25 feet * ** St. Louis Park 30 feet Richfield 30 feet Eden Prairie 30 feet Wayzata 30 feet 30 feet or "prevailing setback," which by policy is the average front street setback of the homes on either side. ** Setback may be reduced to 25 feet with a special use permit * ** Setback may be reduced to average on the block, but not closer than 15 feet Recommendation /Conclusion Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. If ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING THE REGULATION OF FRONT STREET SETBACKS IN THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6.13 is hereby amended as follows: B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11). Front Side Interior Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 1. Single dwelling unit buildings on 301** 15' 10' 25' Lots 75 feet or more in width. 2. Single dwelling unit buildings on lots 301°x* 15' The required 25' more than 60 feet in width, but less interior yard than 75 feet in width. setback of 5 feet shall increase by 1/3 foot (4 inches) for each foot that the lot width exceeds 60 feet.' 3. Single dwelling unit buildings on 60 30'°x* 15' 5' 25' feet or less in width. 4. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings: a. detached garages, tool sheds, -- 15' 3' 3' greenhouses and garden houses entirely within the rear yard, including the eaves. b. attached garages, tool sheds, 30' 15' 5' 25' greenhouses and garden houses. c. detached garages, tool sheds, -- 15' 5' 5' greenhouses and garden houses not entirely within the rear yard. d. unenclosed decks and patios. 30' 15' 5' 5' e. swimming pools, including 30' 15' 10' 10' appurtenant equipment and required decking. f. tennis courts, basketball courts, 30' 15' 5' 5' sports courts, hockey and skating rinks, and other similar recreational accessory uses including appurtenant fencing and lighting. g. all other accessory buildings and 30' 15' 5' 5' structures. 5. Other Uses: a. All conditional use buildings or 50' 50' 50' 50' structures including accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet; except parking lots, day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools b. All conditional use accessory 95' 95' 95' 95' buildings 1,000 square feet or larger. c. Driving ranges, tennis courts, 50' 50' 50' 50' maintenance buildings and swimming pools accessory to a golf course. d. Day care facilities, pre - schools 30' 35' 35' 35' and nursery schools. "* See Subd. 7.A.1. below for required setback when more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of the street between intersections are occupied by principal buildings Section 2. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 7 is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. nEM ft, WON /* r1. Established Front Street Setback. When more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of the street between intersections are occupied by principal buildings, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows:,, If there is an existing principal building on an abutting lot on only one side of the lot, the front street setback requirement (shall be the same as the setback of the principal building or the abutting lot. b. If there are existing- principal buildings on abutting lots on both sides of the lot the front street setback shall be the average of 'khe front street setbacks of the principal buildings on the two abutting lots.' In all other cases, the front street setback shall be the average ;front street setback of all principal buildings on the same side 'of the street between intersections.!. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: r Second Reading: Published: IN r1. Established Front Street Setback. When more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of the street between intersections are occupied by principal buildings, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows:,, If there is an existing principal building on an abutting lot on only one side of the lot, the front street setback requirement (shall be the same as the setback of the principal building or the abutting lot. b. If there are existing- principal buildings on abutting lots on both sides of the lot the front street setback shall be the average of 'khe front street setbacks of the principal buildings on the two abutting lots.' In all other cases, the front street setback shall be the average ;front street setback of all principal buildings on the same side 'of the street between intersections.!. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: r Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010 City Clerk �• 0 � 1 0 FN PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 27, 2010 2009.0004.10a Director of Planning Information & Background As a result of the recent court case with JMS regarding a front street setback variance at 6120 Brookview Avenue, staff is recommending a zoning ordinance amendment to tighten up the existing language for properties in the R -1 zoning district. The variance at 6120 Brookview involved a request to tear down and rebuild a new home on a vacant lot. (See attached staff report and plans regarding 6120 Brookview.) The Zoning Board of Appeals and City Council denied the variance request; the applicant subsequently sued the city. The decision of the court case was in favor of the applicant due in large part to the judge finding that language in the city regulations regarding front street setbacks to be "ambiguous, vague, conflicting and unworkable." Existing & Proposed Ordinance The current zoning regulation regarding front street setback is as follows: A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. Established Average Setback. When more than 25 percent of the frontage on one side of a street between intersections is occupied by buildings having front street setbacks of more or less than 30 feet, the average setback of such existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings or structures or additions thereto on the same side of that street and between said intersections. If a building or structure or addition thereto is to be built or located where there is an established average setback and there are existing buildings on only one side of the built or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front street setback of said new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto need be no greater than that of the nearest adjoining principal building. If a building or structure or addition thereto is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback, and there are existing buildings on both sides of the new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front setback need be no greater than that which would be In addition to the above language, the attached draft ordinance also includes a new reference to the above "Special Requirements" within the existing table within the zoning ordinance establishing required setbacks. Recommendation /Conclusion Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2010—. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING REGULATION OF FRONT YARD SETBACKS IN THE R -1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6.13 is hereby amended as follows: B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11). Front Side Interior Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 1. Single dwelling unit buildings on 30' ** 15' 10' 25' Lots 75 feet or more in width. 2. Single dwelling unit buildings on lots 30' 15' The required 25' more than 60 feet in width, but less interior yard than 75 feet in width. setback of 5 feet shall increase by 1/3 foot (4 inches) for each foot that the lot width exceeds 60 feet.' 3. Single dwelling unit buildings on 60 30' 15' 5' 25' feet or less in width. 4. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings: a. detached garages, tool sheds, -- 15' 3' 3' greenhouses and garden houses entirely within the rear yard, including the eaves. b. attached garages, tool sheds, 30' 15' 5' 25' greenhouses and garden houses. c. detached garages, tool sheds, -- 15' 5' 5' greenhouses and garden houses not entirely within the rear yard. d. unenclosed decks and patios. 30' 15' 5' 5' e. swimming pools, including 30' 15' 10' 10' appurtenant equipment and required decking. f. tennis courts, basketball courts, 30' 15' 5' 5' sports courts, hockey and skating rinks, and other similar recreational accessory uses including appurtenant fencing and lighting. g. all other accessory buildings and 30' 15' 5' 5' structures. 5. Other Uses: a. All conditional use buildings or 50' 50' 50' 50' structures including accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet; except parking lots, day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools b. All conditional use accessory 95' 95' 95' 95' buildings 1,000 square feet or larger. c. Driving ranges, tennis courts, 50' 50' 50' 50' maintenance buildings and swimming pools accessory to a golf course. d. Day care facilities, pre - schools 30' 35' 35' 35' and nursery schools. See Subd. 7.A.1. below for required setback it property is iocatea on a oiocN p 9, that is more than 25% developed with bwldin s: Section 2. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 7 is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. 1. Established Average front Street, Setback. When more than 25 percent of the frontage on one side of a street between intersections is occupied by buildings of FAeFe GIF less than 30 fee , the iEstablished Average (Front Street Setback of such existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings or structures or additions thereto on the same side of that street and between said intersections. The Established Average Front Street Setback shall be calculated in one of three ways:. P., The average shall be calculated by adding up the front street setbacks of all principal buildings on the same side of the street, and dividing by the number of principal buildings; or IGGa+ed wheFe +heFe averrone setback enr)'i f there are existing buildings on an abutting lot on only one side of the built or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front street setback of said new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto need be no greater than that of the nearest adjoining principal building;; or C if a building or stFuGtuFe 9F addition theFete as to be built e s and i� there are existing buildings on both sides of the new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front setback need be no greater than that which would be established by connecting a line pafallel between with the front lot line g.the most forward portion of the adjacent principal building on each side. Section 3. 'Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and in effect after its adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on rno I From: I Date: Subject: Mayor & City Council Kris Aaker Assistant Planner February 17, 2009 An appeal of the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying application B- 09-01, 6120 Brookview Ave. for JMS Custom Homes LLC, for a 7.14 foot front yard setback variance for new home construction. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: REPORT /RECOMMEN VATION Agenda Item # II.0 Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA F1 To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Zoning Board of Appeals heard and denied application B -09 -01 for 6120 Brookview Avenue South for a 7.14 foot front yard setback variance. Info/Background: The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the applicant's 7.14 foot front yard setback variance request on, January 28, 2009. The five member Zoning Board denied the variance request unanimously. See the attached meeting minutes, the resolution adopted by the Zoning Board, the staff report and application information. If the City Council upholds the Zoning Board of Appeals Action, the Council should adopt the attached resolution denying the variance request. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-28 DENYING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE AT 6120 BROOKVIEW AVENUE City of Edina. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 On January 14, 2009 JMS Custom Homes filed an application with the City for a 7.14 front yard setback variance at 6120 Brookview Avenue. The application lists as the legal description of the property Lot 6 Block 23 Fairfax, but the Applicant owns the adjoining lot 5. City Code Section 850.07 Subd. 20(C) provides that abutting non- conforming lots in common ownership at any time after October 22,1951 are deemed one lot. Both Lots 5 and 6 are non - conforming in size and are therefore considered one lot under the City's zoning ordinance. The variance application is deemed to be for the combined lot. 1.02 On January 28, 2009 the Zoning Board of Appeals conducted a public hearing and considered the application for the setback variance. The Applicant was present and was represented by legal counsel. Following the close of the public hearing the Board unanimously denied the variance application based upon written Finding of Fact that the Board adopted. 1.03 On January 29, 2009 the Applicant filed a written appeal of the Board's decision to the City Council. 1.04 On February 17, 2009 the City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal. Following the close of the hearing, the City Council adopted this resolution denying the variance application. 1.05 The request is for an after- the -fact variance for a home under construction. 1.06 A building permit was issued on Friday, December 5, 2008 for the home. The Applicant moved the home that was previously on the property off the property to a different lot. 1.07 The permit was issued based upon a survey prepared by the Applicant's surveyor which indicates that the required front yard setback based upon the average setback of homes on that side of the block was 31.6 feet. The building permit was issued based on the survey, and the home was constructed with a 31.6 foot setback. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -28 Page 2 1.08 The City received a complaint on January 5, 2009, regarding the front yard setback of the new home. The Applicant was promptly notified. The Applicant choose to continue construction. 1.09 The property owner's survey company, Landform, was contacted on January 5, 2009, the day the complaint was received, to determine how the setback was calculated. Landform was unable to respond to the question. The new data subsequently provided by Landform shows the average front yard setback of the seven homes located along the block excluding the subject home is 38.7 feet. The average is calculated by adding up the front yard setbacks, of the seven homes and dividing that number by seven. The home under construction encroaches into the required front yard setback by 7.14 feet. The building permit was issued in error based upon the incorrect information furnished by the Applicant. 1.10 A "stop work" order was posted on the property on Wednesday, January 7, 2009. The owner of the property was notified that resolution of this issue may be pursued by either obtaining a variance to allow the house to remain at the same front yard setback or by modifying the construction to maintain the required front yard setback. 1.11 JMS Custom Homes filed a law suit against the City of Edina, and obtained an order granting a temporary injunction that allows JMS to continue work on the home. Section 2. FINDINGS. 2.01 The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because: 1) The proposal does not meet the variance findings of Section 850.04 Subd.11 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) The Applicant admits that if it had not started construction the required setback would not be an "undue hardship." The City's setback requirements are therefore not creating a hardship. The hardship is solely the result of the surveyor's error. The Applicant chose to continue with the construction knowing that a variance was needed. 3) There is no undue hardship. The City's regulations do not prevent a reasonable use of the property. The proposed new home can be moved or altered to meet the required front yard setback of 38.7 feet. The Applicant moved the home that was RESOLUTION NO. 2009-28 Page 3 previously on the property to a different lot. The new home can be moved back 7.14 feet. 4) The only basis for the variance is the disruption to the Applicant's marketing plan and the cost of moving the home 7.14 feet. Economic considerations alone, however, are not the basis for approval of a variance. 5) The Applicant's plight is not due to circumstances unique to the property. There is nothing unique about the property. 6) The hardship is self- created resulting from the Applicant's miscalculation of the required set back. 7) The variance would alter the essential character of the neighborhood by disrupting the average setback of the .homes on the block. 8) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The setback that would be allowed by the variance would not be consistent with the homes to the south, or the established average setback on the block. b. The new home would be built in front of the home which has a setback 63 feet from the street, thereby blocking the front view to the north. c. The intent of the ordinance is to provide uniform front yard setbacks on a block. Having one home built 31.5 feet closer to the street than the adjacent home does not meet the intent in this instance. 9) Balancing the equities, the variance must be denied. Moving the home back on the lot is feasible. The out of character setback that would be allowed if the variance is granted would be permanent. The Applicant is an experienced, professional custom home builder. The home has not been sold to an end user. The Applicant moved one home off the property to construct the home now under construction and therefore has the knowledge and ability to move the new home. The home that was removed was centered on the lot. The location of the new home a few feet from the property line, although legal, infringes on the privacy of the historic home on the adjoining lot to the south and the setback if approved would worsen the situation. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-28 Page 4 Section 3. DENIAL. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, the requested front yard setback variance of 7.14 feet for property located at 6120 Brookview Avenue is denied. ADOPTED by the City Council on February 17, 2009. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2009-28 Page 5 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 17, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2009. City Clerk RESOLUTION DENYING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE AT 6120 BROOKVIEW AVENUE City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 JMS Custom Homes have requested a 7.14 front yard setback variance at 6120 Brookview Avenue. 1.02 The request is an after -the -fact variance for a home under construction. 1.03 A building permit was issued on Friday, December 5, 2008 for the new home currently under construction on the property. The City received a complaint on January 5, 2009, regarding the front yard setback of the new home. 1.04 The survey submitted for the building permit illustrates an established average front yard setback of 31.6 feet. A building permit was issued based on that survey, and the home was constructed at the proposed 31.6 foot setback. 1.05 The property owner's survey company, Landform, was contacted on January 5, 2009, to verify the how the average setback was calculated. The zoning ordinance requires that the average setback of existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings on the same side of the street between intersections. The data provided by Landform shows the average front yard setback of the seven homes located along the block excluding the subject home is 38.7 feet. The average is calculated by adding up the front yard setbacks of the seven homes and dividing that number by seven. The home under construction therefore, over -laps the required front yard setback by 7.14 feet. The building permit was therefore issued in error based upon the incorrect information furnished by the applicant. 1.06 A "stop work" order was posted on the property on Wednesday, January 7, 2009. The owner of the property was notified that resolution of this issue may be pursued by either filing for and obtaining a variance to allow the house to remain at the same front yard setback or by modifying the construction to maintain the required front yard setback. 1.07 JMS Custom Homes filed a law suit against the City of Edina, and won an order granting a temporary injunction that allows them to continue work on the home. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because: 1) The proposal does not meet the variance findings of Section 850.04.Subd.1.F, of the Zoning Ordinance. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA141! P6 IESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION Page Two 2) There is no unique hardship to the property. The proposed new home can be relocated to meet the required front yard setback of 38.7 feet. 3) When considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact the proposed home built within the required setback would have on the neighborhood, complying with the ordinance is reasonable. 4) The need for the variance is self created. 5) The variance would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 6) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The variance would not be consistent with the homes to the south, or the established average setback on the block. b. The new home would be built essentially in front of the home to the south with is setback 63 feet from the street, thereby blocking their front view to the north. C. The intent of the ordinance is to provide uniform front yard setbacks on a block. Having one home built 31.5 feet closer to the street than the adjacent home does not meet the intent of the ordinance. d. The only basis for the variance is economic considerations alone which is not a sufficient basis. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Zoning Board of Appeals. of the City of Edina, to deny the requested front yard setback variance of 7.14 feet for property located at 6120 Brookview Avenue. Adopted by th Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on January 28, 2009- ATTEST. Chair, Floyd Grabiel g oar Secretary, J ie ogenakker Special Zoning Board Meeting January 28, 2009 Minute Summary Members Present: Chair Floyd Grabiel, Arlene Forrest, Helen Winder, Mary Vasaly and Nancy Scherer B -09 -01 J MS 6120 Brookview Avenue, Edina Request: 7.14 -Foot Front Yard Setback V6rian66e ,. J Planner Presentation \, Planner Aaker informed the Board the applicant is-in ,,the process of building a 2,994 square foot home on the south portion -of a 13,362 square foot lot. The property is one buildable parcel made up of two 50 foot wide lots, (lots 5 and 6), platted as part of the original Fairfax .subdivision. Planner Aaker explained a buildin4, per t was issued %on Friday, December 5, 2008 for the new home currehtlyynder construction:on -the property. The City received a complaint on Jarluary 5 , 2009, regarding t�he�front yard setback of the new home. Concern was taised tEat the home appeared to be closer to the street than code would allow. Tlie survey submitted for the building permit illustrates an established average-front yard Setback-of 31.6 feet.. A building permit was issued based onthat survey, and -,the home was constructed at the proposed 31.6 foot setback. The - owner's survey company, Landform, was contacted on January 5, 2009, to verify how the average setback was calculated. The zoning ordinance requires that the average setback of existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings on the same side of the street between intersections. The data provided by tandform shows that the average front yard setback of the seven homes'. located -along �e block excluding the subject home is 38.7 feet, and not 31.6 feet as indicated on the survey submitted for the building permit. The home under'construgtion therefore, over -laps the required front yard setback by 7.14 feet. The building permit was issued in error based upon incorrect information furnished by the applicant. A stop work , order was posted on the property on Wednesday, January 7, 2009. The owner of the property was notified that resolution of this issue may be pursued by either filing for and obtaining a variance to allow the house to remain at the same front yard setback or by modifying the construction to maintain the required front yard setback. The owner has chosen to pursue a variance to allow the home to remain in its existing location. Planner Aaker reported that JMS Custom Homes filed a law suit and obtained a temporary injunction that allows them to continue work on the home pending the outcome of the law suit The suit is not relevant to the issue of whether or not a variance should be approved. The court documents are attached for informational purposes. r` Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends denial of foot front yard setback variance based on the follb4vin6 fine i 1) The proposal does not meet the vanance"finl `,I.. 850.04.Subd.1.F, of the Zoni4ptlinance:f 2) 3) 5) There is no unique hardship to therpro home can be relocated to meet the•rei 38.7 feet. When considering the equities,of,Al er meet the required setbackvs:: the -imp within the required setbarck'Wouk' have complying with the ordinance is rea of The need for the variance- self crWat The variance would"Ater,the es6e6al neighborhood. The variance would not intent of the 4 7.14- ings,of 'Sectio.n Fk , proposed -neW rontward setback of ng or ovingtli. house to ict he propo 4 home built a.on'the neighborhood, sable: character of the since: _The va ance�wouId not be consistent with the homes to the both, or the established average setback on the block. b: The ,0 - tq the blockir c. The ini setbec to the intent,( s -on d` -`The�only alone wH ne,would; a built essentially in front of the home with is,si�back 63.1 feet from the street, thereby it front view to the north. f \the ordinance is to provide uniform front yard block. Having one home built 31.5 feet closer than the adjacent home does not meet the 'ordinance. sis for the variance is economic considerations is not a sufficient basis. Considering the equ1m4/cf altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact'the proposed home built within the required setback would have on the neighborhood, complying with the ordinance is reasonable. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Coyle, Rob Stefonowicz, Larkin Hoffman and Jeff Schoenwetter, property F, owner. Chair Grabiel noted for the record that the Zoning Board packet #B -09 -01 contained a number of letters and a -mails from neighbors. Applicant Presentation Mr. Coyle told the Board he sincerely regrets the need'for- is,proceeding; however, respectfully disagrees that a variance isneeded. r. Coyle stated there are a couple key points he would like to make, one,'the city's code is vague and conflicting, and secondly, the city approved ancrsigned off on a-building permit to construct the subject house. Mr. Coyle informed the Board that at,this time the subject property is involved in litigation with -the City and the Judge has' noted that the code is susceptible to different inter pretatigns Continuing, Mr. Coyle pointed out a licensed su vey%ompany (Landform) prepared the survey based on their professional interpretation of city code. On the plans submitted for a building permit staff corrected a side \yard ptback figure but did not correct the front yard setback. In January the City of Edina received a complaint from a neighbor,regenfrigithe fronyard setback of the new house. At the time the complaint was made the: house was-well into construction. The City issued a Stop Work Order o th�- house ` and JMS �ras made aware of the issue. Mr. Coyle said in his:opiniorrthis i`ssT is la,tgely attributed to the vague and conflicting code, pointing out the �Judge foundithe code relies on terms not present in the code. Mr.,Coyle stated the surveyor used his professional judgment and the dwelling'urder�construction actually meets or exceeds the front yard setback of the majonty'of the homes on the block. Mr. Coyle reiterated the code is confusing, _ conflict! rid, and-'uriVvc:rkable. Mr. Coyle pointed out there are homes on- the -block hat have a more favorable setback, adding from a professional standpoint they ontinue'to belleve the calculations were done conectly; h weve_r, understand that city-.s!Pff doesn't agree. lAr:.Coy�le said the variance " st' that questions whether "it will relieve an undue hardship which was not self-,,imposed or a mere inconvenience" has been met. Mr., Coyle.pok. ted out a building permit was issued and the house was well along in the construction process `before the Stop Work Order was issued. Mr. Coyle pointed out 4oth JMS and the city relied on the survey prepared by Landform, and the city issued -the: building permit. Mr. Coyle said moving the building back 7.14 -feet would'be impractical and unduly expensive. Continuing, Mr. Coyle stated a hardship wouldbe created for JMS if the house had to be moved farther back on the lot. Mr. Coyle explained that JMS has a contractual committeement to The Parade of Homes and if this house is not completed on schedule and does not meet the Parade of Homes deadline JMS would suffer a substantial hardship. Mr. Coyle noted the new home meets the city's established normal setback and exceeds the citys 30 foot setback minimum. Mr. Coyle stated if they complied with the city's direction and moved the house back on the lot another mature tree would need to be removed. That is also a hardship Mr. Coyle said another criteria that must be met is if the variance would "correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other properties in the vicinity or zoning district" Mr. Coyle noted in his opinion the subject lot is being penalized because of the 63 -foot sett P' of non - compliant structure to the south. Criteria 3 "Preserves a substantial property i the vicinity and zoning district". Mr. Coyle st new house matches the majority average, ai street. Mr. Coyle noted the present setback setback on the block, pointing out two other asking for anything unique or unfair. Concluding Mr. Coyle said criteria 4 si the public welfare of injurious to other Mr. Coyle said by meeting or exceedii isn't causing any harm, reiterating Rib average requirement and the front y front yard setback of the majortyfof th side of the street ff� �1 Chair G_rabiel comnnentec the question before this-q comment on-that i ssue. . home! August of 2008. A that tune\ \With regard to tl Landfoml because they su they Member Vasaly home be built ai area. it possessed by oth Rroperty in :d_ it is clb* -. at;`the so ck of e alsoi atches those across. the �esn't giv(the house -- refere -ial mes are cl� r, adding JnIIS isn't §t "hot`e materially da#imental to X fn.the v inity of zgnihg district". ityl code of30 feet the new house ;d'th e nern house meets the Eck f th�new- }duse matches the as 6n the)blecl( and on the other- atwhetlt or not the city code is good or bad is not d adding board doesn't have the jurisdiction to t e\�nultiple surveys and questioned who owned the Do responded that JMS was the homeowner at i su Mr. Schoenwetter said JMS hired �eyec the subject site for the previous owner. Mr. it it Made sense to him to hire Landform because J assuming the home hadn't yet been built could the code. Mr. Coyle responded there is ample rearyard Member Vasaly noted the impact on the neighboring house to the south, and asked why the new house was constructed so close to the south property line. Mr. Coyle responded the house was positioned in a conforming location. Member Vasaly pointed out the new house could have been placed closer to the 4 north property line thereby positioning the new house farther away from the house that has the deepest setback on the block. Mr. Coyle responded that a business judgment was made on where to position the new house. Member Vasaly questioned the status of the project on January 7t'. Mr. Coyle responded that the house had been under construction for about one month. The house was framed, the footings were in, and the roof was partially done. Mr. Coyle submitted a series of photos along with the injunct'io " lidwing JMS to continue construction. ell Chair Grabiel noted for the record that Planner Tepgue submitted to-the Board photo's dated January 16th and a copy of the"temporary'injuriction. Chair Grabiel opened the public comment: Public Comment Eric Dodee, JMS said it is important to note that the calculation determining the 38.7- foot setback was not prepared by JMS, those dalculations w0e done by the city. r, Chair Grabiel stated the Zoning Board is aresent /this evening'based on the 38.7 - foot setback and JMS is requesting a'va`riance f om that setback. Chair Grabiel said the Board can't discuss if38.7'lor 31.6 is coirect:` The city has determined the required setback at 38.7 with the finding that a 7.14400t front yard setback variance is needed. Dick Whitbeck-6128 Brookview Avenue told the Board in his opinion if the surveyor had difficulty interpreting city code he should have called the city for clarification, adding being\in.the Parade of Homes is not the neighborhoods problem. I r. Whitbeck explained his horn�was constructed in 1866 and is one of thOrst Homes built in Edina. Mr. Whitbeck said his family; along with the neighbors have been good stewards of this neighborhood. Mr. Whitbeck reported4eir house has been renovated with care, received a Heritage Award, pointing out as a result of this project they will now be looking at a solid wall blocking, their views. Mr. Whitbeck also asked the board to note that construction of this house in its_ present loppiion caused the removal of a 200 year old Oak tree, and is "setting" up the property for future subdivision. Mr. Whitbeck added the placement of the house should have been approached with common sense, pointing out the new house was built well to one side of the lot, reiterating the potential for subdivision Concluding, Mr. Whitbeck stated the new house in its present location is detrimental to their property and out of character with the neighborhood. Jackie Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, presented to the Board photos of what she views today from her property. She told the board the past house was situated in the middle of the lot(s) (at least 40 feet away from the common side property line and back from the street). Ms. Whitbeck asked the Board to note the entire JMS house is situated in front of her home, pointing out the new house has been constructed on only one portion of the lot(s). Continuing, Ms. Whitbeck said Landform surveyed the property for a previous developer and that developer walked away from the subdivision because of neighborhood opposition. Ms. Whitbeck pointed out JMS is familiar with the city's setback rules, they build in Edina. Ms. Whitbeck said when the building process started one is project the neighbors were very upset with the loss of the Oa tree. - Ms..:1Nh eck stressed this property is not subdivided, it's one 100 foot 166 dIn ,her opinion it's obvious this house was positioned with a subdivision in mmd. Continuing with her comments Ms. Whitbeck explained that after the new h u, We as framed she observed that in her opinion the new house was se too.cIl se to th0tredl She' also observed the grade was changed with drainage-no v,G �directed onto their property. Ms. Whitbeck further explained that because of'-h, historic nature of her property the driveway is gravel and water run=off could be ..me an issue. Concluding, Ms. Whitbeck stated in her opinion the survey presented by Landform is very misleading, certain items,!ere�xcluded from the:- s0rvey, and in her opinion the new house should be moved,: it's been done before by JMS. Mr. Joseph Lawver; 6121 Brookvie trying to circumvent the Code, addin surveyor. Mr. Lawver infornned;th"e� mail. Mr. Lawver said the neighbor house and asked the Boarl,�to,haVe feet to the north and 7 feet :to there JMS, adding there is no undue.la Concluding, Mr.,Lawver pointed out' to this p oo*, have lost all their. pri, Ms. Carol Carmichiel:, 611.2 Boa td: s4a opposes thelvad Camnicliiel added that she property.- Conti nuing, Ms. C in keeping vii ith the neighbo property.. :.The height of 6 values would tie °negatively the house that;was dernolis. 900 - thousand dollar house.` fr • -/ 7 i w�'Ave�ue, told�the Board: in his opinion JMS is g hers also - ffended�by�tfie work of the Board he`�has been in.contact with JMS via e- hood had peen_hab Od as a result of this the proRerty-.owne - move the new house 20 ar. Mr. LawV' q"`I erated he is offended by ship to support approval of the variance. he neighbors to the south directly adjacent vacy, reiterating the house should be moved. )kvi w Avenue, (home to the north) told the and asked the Board to deny this request. Ms. �oesn't want to see future subdivision of this iichiel stated in her opinion the new house is not stressing the new house negatively impacts her house impacts her privacy and her property acted. Concluding, Ms. Carmichiel pointed out was affordable and now has been replaced by a Ms. Jane Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, stated the correct legal description of the subject property is Lots 5 & 6, Fairfax, not Lot 6, Fairfax, which has been consistently used to describe this property. Ms. Westin with graphics displayed numerous surveys depicting the subject site, stressing this is one lot not two. Ms. Westin suggested that the new house be moved to a better location, not up against the south property line and too close to the street. Continuing, Ms. 6 Westin pointed out the 6100 bock of Brookview is made up of modest, well kept homes, including one historic home and now the block includes one expensive overly large home. Concluding, Ms. Westin said the neighborhood is also unhappy with the 200 year old Oak tree that was removed to "make way' for the new house. Ms. Marion Clay, 6117 Brookview Avenue, urged the Planning Commission to deny the variance. ff 6141 Brookview Avenue, statedAn her opinion the new house is Turk Miroslava, f, injurious to the block. Chair Grabiel thanked everyone for their input and'said .aVAhis time, the Board will discuss the requested 7.14 front yard setback valance, Chair Grabiel,clarified' that the Board cannot act on the removal of the Oaktree or- future subdivision request if that should occur. Board Comments and Action'\ A discussion ensued with Board Members in agreemeritt Iat the hardship test has not been met. Members sympathizes that'an,error.wad made; however, there is no justification in granting the. requested variance. Board Members did acknowledge that it wasn't the .neighbors reSporisibility " calculate setback, adding it was unfortunate that'inc6tr ct calculati6s,_wermade. Member Vasaly moved denial of B -09-01 1�6sq ,Orr staff findings and adoption of those findings. Member Scherer seconded the motion. Ayes; Forrest, Scherer .-Vasaly, Winder;_ Grabiel. Motion for denial carried. r J Larkin Hoff man •rroaNers January 29, 2009 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Department City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Variance Application for 6120 Brookview, Edina, MN Appeal of Denial by Zoning Board of Appeals Dear Mr. Teague: Larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952 -835 -3800 FAX: 952 -896 -3333 WES: wwwlarkinhoffman.com Va Email and U.S. Mail We represent JMS Custom Homes, LLC ( "JMS ") in connection with the above - referenced variance application. This letter shall serve as JMS's request for an appeal from the Zoning Board of Appeals' January 28, 2009 denial of JMS's variance request. JMS requests that the appeal of the variance denial be scheduled for the next regularly scheduled Edina City Council meeting. If you should have any questions concerning JMS's requested appeal or need any further information or documentation, please advise. Thank you. Sincerely, Rob A. Stefono cz, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lin en Ltd. Direct Dial: 952- 896 -3254 Direct Fax: 952- 842 -1718 Email: rstefonowicz(@,Iarkinhoffrnan.com Cc: Jeff Schoenwetter Eric Doty Tom Scott, Esq. Peter Coyle, Esq. 1238657.1 City of Edina January 29, 2009 JMS Custom Homes, LLC 5250. West 74`h Street Edina, MN 55439 Re: B -09 -01 - A 7.14 foot front yard setback variance for a new home at 6120 Brookview Avenue, Edina, MN To Whom It May Concern: In connection with your recent request for the above referenced variance, which was heard by the Edina Zoning Board on Wednesday, January 28, 2009, may we advise you that same has been denied. If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board to the Edina City Council, a letter of intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than February 9, 2009. If you have further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at 952 - 826 -0465. Sincerely, Jackie Hoogenakker Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals 1 City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Kris Aaker January 28, 2009 B -09 -01 Assistant Planner Brief Description: A 7.14 foot front yard setback variance for a new home under construction at 6120 Brookview Avenue for JMS Construction. Recommended Action: Deny the 7.14 foot front yard setback variance request. Introduction /Background The applicant is in the process of building a 2,994 square foot home on the south portion of a 13,362 square foot lot. The property is one buildable parcel made up of two 50 foot wide lots, (lots 5 and 6), platted as part-of the original Fairfax subdivision. A building permit was issued on Friday, December 5, 2008 for the new home currently under construction on the property. The City received a complaint on January 5, 2009, regarding the front yard setback of the new home. Concern was raised that the home appeared to be closer to the street than code would allow. The survey submitted for the building permit illustrates an established average front yard setback of 31.6 feet. (See attached survey.) A building permit was issued based on that survey, and the home was constructed at the proposed 31.6 foot setback. The owner's survey company, Landform, was contacted on January. 5, 2009, to verify how the average setback was calculated. The zoning ordinance requires that the average setback of existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings on the same side of the street between intersections. The data provided by Landform shows that the average front yard setback of the seven homes located along the block excluding the subject home is 38.7 feet, and not 31.6 feet as indicated on the survey submitted for the building permit. The home under construction therefore, over- laps the required front yard setback by 7.14 feet. The building permit was issued in error based upon incorrect information furnished by the applicant. A "stop work" order was posted on the property on Wednesday, January 7, 2009. The owner of the property was notified that resolution of this issue may be pursued by either filing for and 143562 1 obtaining a variance to allow the house to remain at the same front yard setback or by modifying the construction to maintain the required front yard setback. The owner has chosen to pursue a variance to allow the home to remain in its existing location. Law Suit JMS Custom Homes filed a law suit and obtained a temporary injunction that allows them to continue work on the home pending the outcome of the law suit The suit is not relevant to the issue of whether or not a variance should be approved. The court documents are attached for informational purposes. Front Yard Setback Calculation The required setback for the R -1 zoning district is 30 feet. However, Section 850.11. Subd. 7.A established special front yard setback requirements for single dwelling unit lots. There are three ways to calculate the front yard setback, as demonstrated below: 1) Established Average Setback. When more than 25 percent of the frontage on one side of the street between intersections is occupied by buildings having front street setbacks of more or less than 30 feet, the average setback of such existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings or structures or additions thereto on the same side of that street and between said intersections. The "special front yard setback" rule is required for the subject lot because there is more than 25 percent of the frontage on the subject side of.the street between intersections occupied by buildings having front street setbacks of more or less than 30 feet. The block is fully developed so the standard 30 foot setback is not applied with the special setback requirements used instead in this instance. To determine the established average .setback, the setbacks of the seven homes on the block are added together and divided by 7. The resulting average front yard setback is 38.7 feet for this block. The "average of the block front setback line" of 31.6 feet, as depicted on the survey, is in error, or 7.14 feet closer to the street. It appears that the surveyor simply connected a line from the homes on each corner. 2) If a building or structure or addition thereto is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback and there are existing buildings on only one side of the built or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front street setback of said new or relocated building -or structure or addition thereto need be no greater than that of the nearest adjoining principal building. This second paragraph of the special front yard setback requirements does not apply to the lot because there are existing buildings on both sides of the subject lot. 3) "If a building or structure or addition thereto is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback, and there are existing buildings on both sides of 143562 the new or relocated building or structure or addition thereto, the front setback need be no greater than that which would be established by connecting a line parallel with the front lot line connecting the forward most portion of the adjacent principal building on each side." This third option could apply to the lot by connecting the forward most portions of the homes on either side. The survey did not illustrate the "connecting line" rule and in fact would have put the home farther back on the lot than the established average setback, because the home to the south is setback so far. The least restrictive setback in this instance is the established average setback. The least restrictive setback applicable is the established average setback. Primary Issue Is the requested variance justified? Per Section 850.04.Subd.l.F, of the Zoning Ordinance, the following findings must be made: Findings for Variances. The Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Section. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by this Section; (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms of this Section. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests: 1) Is there an undue hardship that prevents a reasonable use of the property? No. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there is an undue hardship in complying with the Code that prohibits what is really a reasonable use. "Undue hardship" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The proposed use is not reasonable because it does not fit into the character of the neighborhood. While two out of seven structures on the block are closer to 143562 the street than the subject home, a reduction in setback beyond the average on the block is excessive and out of character especially regarding the location of the neighboring home to the south. There is no undue hardship other then the hardship created by the applicant's error in calculating the set back. The partially built home can be moved back on the lot and meet set backs. When considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact on the neighborhood, staff believes complying with the ordinance is reasonable. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? No. There are no unique or specific characteristics of the lot that would support granting a variance. A home can be built without encroaching beyond the average setback line. The lot is generous in area at 13,362 square feet, with ample room in which to locate at structure within the required setbacks. The need for the variance is entirely self created resulting from an error made by the applicant's surveyor. The applicant is a professional builder and its marketing plans for the home will be disrupted and costs will be incurred in moving the home back on the lot but economic considerations alone are not a basis for approving a variance. The applicant chose to proceed with constructing the home after being advised of the setback error. 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Yes. The new home would not be consistent with the homes to the south, which are setback 63.1 and 44.4 feet. The new home would be built essentially in front of the home to the south with is setback 63.1 feet from the front lot line, thereby blocking their front view to the north. A home of this size built this close to the street would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Deny the requested 7.14 -foot front yard setback variance. Denial is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal does not meet the variance findings of Section 850.04.Subd.1.F, of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) There is no unique hardship to the property. The proposed new home can be relocated to meet the required front yard setback of 38.7 feet. 3) When considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact the proposed home built within the 143562 required setback would have on the neighborhood, complying with the ordinance is reasonable. 4) The need for the variance is self created. 5) The variance would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 6) The variance would not meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The variance would not be consistent with the homes to the south, or the established average setback on the block. b. The new home would be built essentially in front of the home to the south with is setback 63.1 feet from the street, thereby blocking their front view to the north. C. The intent of the ordinance is to provide uniform front yard setbacks on a block. Having one home built 31.5 feet closer to the street than the adjacent home does not meet the intent of the ordinance. d. The only basis for the variance is economic considerations alone which is not a sufficient basis. 7) Considering the equities of altering or moving the house to meet the required setback vs. the impact the proposed home built within the required setback would have on the neighborhood, complying with the ordinance is reasonable. Surrounding Land Uses There are single family homes located on the north, south, east and west sides of the subject property. Site Features The property is 13,362 square feet and contains a partially constructed, two -story home with an attached three car garage. Planning Guide Plan Designation: R -1, single family residential Zoning: Residential 143562 5 SETBACK LINE EXHIBIT FOR: JMS CUSTOM HOMES - - - MOST FORWARD CORNER II II �3 I I IU.8' ----- _- 34.5' --�•I I I LI SOMM IN FEET 0 50 SCALE IN FEET BEST F17 LINE USED TO _ I ESTABLISH AN AVERAGE SETBACK II I I I ... I . MOST FORWARD CORNER Iza.z' -� —I • • • • L A .: D F O R M p J SOMM IN FEET 0 50 SCALE IN FEET SETBACK LINE EXHIBIT FOR: JMS CUSTOM HOMES SGMZ IN FEET 0 m SCALE IN FEET MOST FORWARD CORNER ----------- 0' BEST PIT LINE: USED TO ESTABLISH AN AVERAGE SETBACK "-MOST FORWARD CORNER 2D lee. ----------- 28.2'- 800 c Butler Square 100 North Sixth Street L A N Q s O R: Minneapolis, MN 55403 LWeb: landform.net Job No. Drawing: 3eLback cxhbn —I By. " BEST PIT LINE: USED TO ESTABLISH AN AVERAGE SETBACK "-MOST FORWARD CORNER 28.2'- 800 c Butler Square 100 North Sixth Street L A N Q s O R: Minneapolis, MN 55403 LWeb: landform.net Job No. Drawing: 3eLback cxhbn —I By. " Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 850.11 concerning regulation of front yard setbacks in the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Planner Presentation i Planner Teague informed the Commission tha as result of the'recent court case with JMS regarding a front street setback variance <at 6120 Broo cview Avenue, staff is recommending a zoning ordinance amendment to tighten, Ph( existing language for properties in the R -1 zon�iing district,The variance at 6120 Brookview involved a request to tear down and \rebuild anew home on a vacant lot. The Zoning Board of Appeals and City Council denied the�variance request; the applicant subsequently sued the city. The decision-of the caurt case was in favor of the applicant due in large part to the. judge findinglhat language in the city regulations regarding front street setbdcks to`be "ambiguous, vague, conflicting and unworkable." // I\ � . ,,j Planner Teague noted at last month's meetin$' h� planning dommission asked staff to bring back a revised o�rnance�to make';the,existing language more clear. Planner Teague skeq the/Conimission td refer to the draft ordinance amendment. % Discussion \ The discussion focused on th"urrent,front yard setback options provided for in the Ordind' ce and the Judge's re. .qent ruling. Commissioners questioned the reaso 2 i�g behindihe three options \, pointing out establishing a standard front yard/ setbaek'would -b"asier��Plannerr� ague agreed, adding he believes the r� Lnr�g behind the thre� options was because of Edina's many unique Sneighb , oods, noting; as has been mentioned time and time again, in Edina,. one size d�esn t fit all". Co clud'ng, Planner Teague noted that the present Ordiy�nce language had been "on the books" many years guiding Edina's residential develbpment. , 9taff felt that clarifying the "options" was needed. Commissione grabiel comf ented that part of the reason the City is amending the Ordinance is because/the Judge deemed that the Ordinance in its present state was worth less\ap5Vneed ed to be "cleaned up." Commissioner Grabiel said in his opinion this needs to be accomplished as soon as possible to ensure that those "gray" areas currently in the Ordinance are clarified. Commissioner Grabiel commented that if the Commission wants to re- review the front yard setback portion of the Ordinance at another time that could be done during the re -write process. Chair Fischer agreed, adding the crux of the issue is for the Commission to decide to accept the changes drafted by staff or re -write the A Ordinance at this time, acknowledging the Commission has time during the re- write process to revisit this topic. The discussion continued with Commissioners agreeing that the amended language achieves the goal of clarifying the front yard setback section of the Ordinance. Commissioners suggested changes to the amended language by motion. Action Commissioner Brown moved to recomme - d agprov of amentling Zoning Ordinance No. 850.1.1 as per staff's draft ith the fdilowh g chang ;s: J • .Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6.B.- Minlmum-$et�ksi : .add asterisks under numbers 2. & 3. Font Street Under chart: �\ • Replace: See Subd. 7. A.1. below_for required setback if property is located on a block that is mores than 25% developed with buildings to= *See Subd. 7. A. 1. below f� required setback when;more that 25 % of the lots on one side of � a st(eet between- intersectionsare occupied by'principal buildi, gsY �j • Section 2. Sub Section 850.'1, � bdivi: ion 7.- Special Requirements: Special Requirements�fo�i Single Dwi elling UJnit ots. A. 1. • Replace " Establishd Average Setback" with "Established Front Street, S�etback ". • Replace "When lots representing -more than 25 percent of the frontage" wi h. "Whin more than 25% of the lots: •�- Strike-Withou kprinci'041- building �fniss'one' r Grabi I secohded the Lion. All voted aye; motion carried. r Fischer said the fron yard setback requirements would be added to the ket lis ' as continuing discussion during the update review process. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 13 of 16 new house is built at 5500 Halifax Lane. Planner Teague explained if the new house meets Ordinance requirements neighbors would not be notified. Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest observed if this rearrangement is approved it could open up the potential for the newer house (5504 Halifax Lane) to add on, pointing out the City has had issues with massing. Commissioner Grabiel questioned if the lot division could even proceed pointing out the rearrangement creates a new lot line that cuts through an existing house. Planner Teague responded and clarified that a condition of approval is that prior to the City of Edina filing the approved resolution shifting the lot line, the existing home at 5500 Halifax Lane must be removed from the site. Ayes; Carpenter, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Fischer. Nays; Risser, Grabiel, Forrest. Motion carried. 2009.0004.10a Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Front Street Setback Planner Presentation - Planner Teague informed the Commission that as a result of the loss of a court case with JMS regarding front street setback staff is recommending a zoning ordinance amendment to tighten up the existing language for properties in the R -1 zoning district. Amending the Code is due in large part to the judge finding that language in the City regulations regarding front street setbacks to be "ambiguous, vague, conflicting and unworkable." Continuing, Planner Teague explained the three current options an applicant has in determining front yard setback. Discussion The question was raised if the "three options" work in Edina, acknowledging the three options make sense because of Edina's different character districts; but does it work. Planner Teague told the Commission the three options worked well Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 14 of 16 until recently. Planner Teague pointed out that this ordinance has been in place for many years, it's how the City developed. Commissioner Grabiel said he understands and agrees there is the need to amend the ordinance; however, he continues to find the draft ambiguous and the language confusing. The discussion continued with Commissioners acknowledging the importance of amending this portion of the ordinance in a timely fashion; noting the revised ordinance presented this evening is a good first step. Commissioners raised the following: • Are three options really needed? Noting "one size doesn't fit all" in Edina. • If the City continues it's three option choice does the applicant get to chose which option, and if so, is that advantageous to the City, pointing out most would pick the one that suited them best. How is this tightened up? • Language; definition of established front yard setback, exceptions? In B. "on a corner lot situation" should the ordinance consider the house across the street, its view could be compromised; and "most forward portion of in M.C. should that be further clarified to "nearest corner" or something similar. Situations are so different. • Consider illustrations. Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague if there is another area within the ordinance that addresses front yard setback. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative, adding the City has a minimum front yard setback requirement of 30 feet; however, that is used for undeveloped parcel(s), pointing out that Edina has a minimal number of vacant parcels where the minimum 30 feet works. Subd. 7. Special Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit lots "trump: the 30 foot minimum in all established neighborhoods. Commissioners acknowledged that "all in all" the current ordinance and the amended version would not have prevented the situation that occurred on Brookview Avenue, adding even If the surveyor had calculated the established front yard setback correctly the house would be seven feet back from its current location and still in front of the house next door. Planner Teague agreed the situation on Brookview is a rarity. Continuing, Commissioners acknowledged that the ordinance in its current form must be addressed and suggested that this item be held over to allow staff time to collect data from other cities on how they address front yard setback, adding if any Commissioner has an idea on how the current language could be further clarified they should e-mail Planner Teague their thoughts. Commissioners also expressed understanding that an amendment is needed in a timely fashion, leaving the door open for further study on this issue down the road. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 15 of 16 Action Commissioner Staunton moved to table this issue until the next meeting allowing staff time to research how other cities have established their front yard setback criteria. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Planner Teague told the Commission he would bring back a revised version of the amended ordinance, adding his goal would be to further clarify the options. III. COMMUNITY COMMENT: A resident of Halifax Lane thanked the Commission for all their work, adding he was impressed with their questions and comments on the issues presented. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: Public Works Site Small Area Guide Process Presentation Chair Fischer delivered a power point presentation on the Small Area Guide Process. Comments /Questions Commissioner Scherer asked if this "Guide" is generic or for a specific project. Chair Fischer responded this guide process is for a specific project; the public works site, adding if this works well it could be used as a model for other small area plans. Chair Fischer said what needs to happen in the near future is the recruiting of residents to "sit" in as members of the Community Advisory Team (CAT) and Design Team. Chair Fischer explained the intent is to conclude all meetings, etc with a joint Council /Commission meeting sometime in May 2010. Commissioner Scherer said she remembers the past redevelopment process concerning the public works site, pointing out that process was very lengthy. Continuing, she asked Chair Fischer how the City plans on notifying the community this process is happening. Chair Fischer said the City will use all means available to "get the word out ". Commissioner Brown said from past experience (Greater Southdale Area Guide Plan) the message needs to be very clear. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. Ill. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE , _ �0/L City Engineer z Action F-1 Discussion ❑ Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Change Order Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5C: Unit Masonry ACTION REQUESTED: Approve change order for Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5C: Unit Masonry for the new Edina Public Works Building. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This change order is for the miscellaneous masonry items for the new Edina Public Works building. The change order includes items such as the replacement of the parapet block along the entire perimeter of the vehicle storage area. It was'discovered that the block was in very poor condition by the roofing contractor during the demolition of the existing roof; the architect did not anticipate replacing this amount of block. Another major item in this change order is the patching of masonry walls in the vehicle storage area; this was due to the additional patching after the removal of the interior walls. The proposed change order will increase the contract amount with Gresser Companies by more than ten percent, therefore requiring City Council approval. The total increase of the change orders to date for this contract is $52,270. The original contract amount is $261,900. JEDUNN, the City's construction manager had originally budgeted $276,740 for this contract. The overall contingency for this project was budgeted at $331,015. The overall change orders to date, including the four change orders in the Council packet is $181,497. Therefore this project is still within budget. ATTACHMENTS: No attachments included. g:\ engineering \infrastructure\public buildings\pw - 7450 metro boulevard \contract no. 5 general construction \contracts \contract no. 5c unit mason ry\2010031 6 item iii. a. change order rr.docx C� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. Ill. B. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE - City Engineer ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Change Order Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5D: Miscellaneous Metals Materials ACTION REQUESTED: Approve change order for Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5D: Miscellaneous Metals Materials. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This change order is for the miscellaneous metal materials. This contract included railing and stairways within the new Edina Public Works building. The change order includes items such as the addition of a stairway to the mezzanine in the mechanic area due to building code requirements. The proposed change order will increase the contract amount with Sierra Metals by more than ten percent, therefore requiring City Council approval. The total increase of the change orders to date for this contract is $12,115. The original contract amount is $117,395. JEDUNN, the City's construction manager had originally budgeted $156,364 for this contract. The overall contingency for this project was budgeted at $331,015. The overall change orders to date, including the four change orders in the Council packet is $181,497. Therefore this project is still within budget. ATTACHMENTS: No attachments included. g:\ engineering \infrastructure\public buildings\pw - 7450 metro boulevard \contract no. 5 general construction \contracts \contract no. 5d misc metal (matl only)\20100316 item iii. b. change order rr.docx Otte REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. C. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion 0 Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Change Order Edina Public Works - Improvement PW -1, Contract 5E: Miscellaneous Metals Installation ACTION REQUESTED: Approve change order for Edina Public Works - Improvement PW -1, Contract 5E: Miscellaneous Metal Installation. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This change order is for the miscellaneous metals installation. This contract included installation of the railing and stairways within the new Edina Public Works building. The change order includes items such as the addition of a stairway to the mezzanine in the mechanic area due to building code requirements. The proposed change order will increase the contract amount with A.M.E. Construction Group by more than ten percent, therefore requiring City Council approval. The total increase of the change orders to date for this contract is $4,730. The original contract amount is $42,600. JEDUNN, the City's construction manager had originally budgeted $104,243 for this contract. The overall contingency for this project was budgeted at $331,015. The overall change orders to date, including the four change orders in the Council packet is $181,497. Therefore this project is still within budget. ATTACHMENTS: No attachments included. g:\ engineering \infrastructure \public buildings\pw - 7450 metro boulevard \contract no. 5 general construction\contracts \contract no. 5d misc metal (matl only)\20100316 item iii. b. change order rr.docx REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. D. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE - City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Change Order Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5M: Accordion Folding Partitions ACTION REQUESTED: Approve change order for Edina Public Works — Improvement PW -1, Contract 5M: Accordion Folding Partitions. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This change order is for the accordion folding partitions in the multi - purpose room for the new Edina Public Works building. The change order includes deleting two sheet- rocked pocket walls for the folding doors and attaching them directly to the wall. This provides more aesthetically pleasing look to the multi - purpose room. The proposed change order will increase the contract amount with Hufcor Minnesota, LLC by more than ten percent, therefore requiring City Council approval. The total increase of the only change order for this contract is $2,859. The original purchase order is $23,691. JEDUNN, the City's construction manager had originally budgeted $21,150 for this contract. The overall contingency for this project was budgeted at $331,015. The overall change orders to date, including the four change orders in the Council packet is $181,497. Therefore this project is still within budget. ATTACHMENTS: No attachments included. g:\engineering\infrastructure \public buildings\pw - 7450 metro boulevard\contract no. 5 general construction \contracts \contract no. 5m accordion folding partitions - no bids taken\20100316 item iii. d. change order rr.docx o e Cn \�ooxroaAT�� aee RE PO RURECO M M E N ®ATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. A. From: Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director M Action Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Update to Edina Purchasing Policy ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that Council adopt a motion to update the City's purchasing policy, as attached in redline format. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City's current purchasing policy was last updated in 2000. Since then, inflation, changes in business practices, and changes in State Law have made parts of the policy look out of date. Major changes include: 1. Changing the level of purchase that requires Council approval from $15,000 to $20,000. 2. Changing the competitive bidding level from either $25,000 or $35,000, depending on the project type, to $100,000 for all projects. 3. Changing the level for requiring quotes from $2,500 to $10,000, while encouraging quotes for levels below the threshold and also encouraging use of the State's Cooperative Purchasing Venture, which makes gathering quotes unnecessary. ATTACHMENTS: Attached is a redline version that highlights recommended changes to the City's purchasing policy for your consideration. r (Approved by City Council November 18, 1991 and revisions approved April 4, 1994 April 2,1997, And December 19, 2000) CITY OF EDINA PURCHASING POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS PART I: Policies and Requirements Applicable to All Purchases and Contracts (Refer to the Handbook for Minnesota Cities filed in the Clerk's office for detailed information) 1.1. Budget — Before any commitment for purchase of an item or service is made, money needs to be budgeted, either directly for the item or service or by means of a budgeted fund into which the purchase can be categorized. Purchases not within a budget require Finance Director and City Council approval for availability and transfer of funds. It is up to each Department to insure that it has not made commitments for more money than has been budgeted. 1.2. Expenditure Requirements — All expenditures of funds require approval of the City Manager and Finance Director before actual disbursement. (Minn. Stat. § 412.271, subdivision 8). Before funds can be disbursed for any purchase, the purchase must meet three criteria: a. First, statutory authority must exist for the City to make the particular purchase. While not a problem in most cases, certain purchases may require research; b. Second, it must be purchased for a public purpose; and Third, the City Manager and Finance Director must have properly approved the expenditure. Generally, an expenditure will be for a public purpose if it benefits the inhabitants of the community as a whole and if it is directly connected with the government of the City. All of these tests must be met prior to any commitment. If in doubt, check with the Finance Director. If City money is spent for unauthorized purchases, the members of the City Council could be personally liable. 1.3. Required Authorization for Purchase — In addition to the requirement that the City Manager and Finance Director approve of each expenditure of funds, the following authorizations are required prior to ordering or obtaining any item or service: a. $20,000 and over — All purchases $20,000 and over need City Manager, Finance Director and Council approval prior to ordering or purchasing. (Minn. Stat. § 412.6810. All such purchases will use the Request For Purchase form. (APPENDIX A) b. Over X50)$10,000 to $4-5-,AA9 20,000 — All purchases over $10,000 2-589 U2 to but not including $20,000 4099 require City Manager and Finance Director approval 2dor to ordering and purchasing. All such purchases will use the Purchase Requisition form. (APPENDIX B) 1.4. Statutorily Mandated Processes for Selected Purchases and Rentals — The purchase of supplies, materials, equipment or rental of same, or the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of real or personal property, in addition to the procedures at 1. 1, 1.2 and 1.3 above, require the following procedures (Minn. Stat. § 471.345 and Minn. Stat. § 412.311): a. , $100,000 or over, $25,000 f eA o aditu -e f ^ ffejeet to be speeially assessed under- Minn. Stat. Chapter- — If the expenditure is estimated to exceed $33,00) 100,000, °r $25,009 in the ^ o „ -f^.. ^ endit ,.^ F . then the following is required: (i) Sealed bids with appropriate public notice (See PART B below); (ii) Purchase Order (APPENDIX C) properly filled out or contract (subject to Council Approval); (iii) A performance and payment bond in the amount of the contract if the contract is for the doing of any public work (Minn. Stat. § 574.26); (iv) Finance Director approval; (v) City Manager approval; (vi) Council approval; (vii) Award of contract to the lowest responsible bidder; and (viii) City Manager and Finance Director approval prior to actual disbursement of funds. b. Oy^oA9 20 000 into $33;099 100,000 , pr-ejeet to be speeially assessed und-i-ar- -A'4-inffl. Stat. Chapter. 449) — If the expenditure is estimated to be 20 000 or over but not over $33;999 100,000, , assessed +^r- 429, then the following is required: (i) Either- sSealed bids with appropriate public notice the same as for expenditures $100,000 or over may be used., or- $25,000 ., the ease ef an expenditure fer- a pr-ejeet te be speeialiy assessed under- er4 Direct negotiation can also be used, by obtaining two or more written quotations, when possible.; The purchaser must also consider using the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture when not using sealed bids. Any item may be purchased using the FA State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture without obtaining additional quotes, (ii) A Purchase Order or contract appFeval); (iii) A performance and payment bond in the amount of the contract if the contract is for the doing of any public work (Minn. Stat. § 574.26); (iv) Finance Director approval; (v) City Manager approval; (vi) Council approval; (vii) Award of contract to lowest responsible bidder; and (viii) City Manager and Finance Director approval prior to actual disbursement of funds. C. Over $10,000 to $ NQ 20,000 — If the expenditure is estimated to be over $10,000 up to but not including $20,000 ever- $15,000, then the following is required: (i) At least two written quotations shall be received unless there is only one supplier or vendor. The purchaser must also consider using the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture. Any item may be purchased using the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture without obtaining additional quotes; (ii) Purchase Order -Requisition form ; (iii) Beth a perf nee bend and payment 1.,.nd a eh in the .. nt of the :Fti.o. .,.,nt:.,et .s for. the deiiig of any publir. .-k (Minfl. St.,t §574.26); (iv) Finance Director approval; (v) City Manager approval; and (vi) City Manager and Finance Director approval prior to actual disbursement of funds. a. ^ vker- $23 e $10,000 � if the expenditure is estimated to be ever $2,500 but ever- not 3 e. $2,509 10,000 or less — If the expenditure is estimated to be $'N 10,000 or less, the following is required: (i) Purchases at this level may makes written quotations impracticable, therefore, such purchases shall be made on the open market and written quotations shall not be required, although employees are encouraged get verbal or written quotes. If either verbal or written quotes are obtained, there must be at least two and they must be retained for one year; (iii) City Manager approval, or approval by the head of the Department for which the purchase is being made, or approval by one of the persons named on the then current list of persons approved by the City Manager and kept on file with the Finance Director; and (iii *) City Manager and Finance Director approval prior to actual disbursement of funds. All yep- quotations shall be attached to the Purchase Order and kept on file with the Purchase Order. Among purchases not requiring the above procedures are purchases of such as insurance, real estate, and services (see paragraph 2.13 "When Bidding Is Unnecessary" below). Even when not required, it is desired, if a purchase is in a competitive area, that quotations be obtained for comparison purposes. If the public bidding process is used, even if not required, all aspects of that process must be complied with. 1.5. Purchase Order Processing a. The responsible Department must prepare a requisition form (APPENDIX B) with all pertinent information included and submit to Finance Department. The pertinent information must include a description of the product, quantity, price, 2 supplier- er- vender-; (ii) 0--r-der- filled out; pr-eper-iy ^cgi: e. $2,509 10,000 or less — If the expenditure is estimated to be $'N 10,000 or less, the following is required: (i) Purchases at this level may makes written quotations impracticable, therefore, such purchases shall be made on the open market and written quotations shall not be required, although employees are encouraged get verbal or written quotes. If either verbal or written quotes are obtained, there must be at least two and they must be retained for one year; (iii) City Manager approval, or approval by the head of the Department for which the purchase is being made, or approval by one of the persons named on the then current list of persons approved by the City Manager and kept on file with the Finance Director; and (iii *) City Manager and Finance Director approval prior to actual disbursement of funds. All yep- quotations shall be attached to the Purchase Order and kept on file with the Purchase Order. Among purchases not requiring the above procedures are purchases of such as insurance, real estate, and services (see paragraph 2.13 "When Bidding Is Unnecessary" below). Even when not required, it is desired, if a purchase is in a competitive area, that quotations be obtained for comparison purposes. If the public bidding process is used, even if not required, all aspects of that process must be complied with. 1.5. Purchase Order Processing a. The responsible Department must prepare a requisition form (APPENDIX B) with all pertinent information included and submit to Finance Department. The pertinent information must include a description of the product, quantity, price, 2 account codes, applicable specifications, and any similar information. NOTE; Purchase Order numbers must be obtained prior to any purchase commitment. b. The responsible Department or the Finance Department will prepare the Purchase Order and obtain the City Manager and the Finance Director's signature. C. Approval as provided in paragraph 1.4 and applicable to the total amount of the purchase order, must be obtained prior to submission to the vendor. d. Copies of the Purchase Order will be distributed by the Finance Department as follows: (i) Or-igiaal -One copy to vendor; (ii) B€€ One copy to Finance Department retained file; and (iii) Pi*k- One copy to ordering department to await receipt of items ordered and then to be returned to Finance Department along with approved invoice. e. Upon City Manager and Finance Director approval, payment may be sent to vendor. 1.6. Central Purchasing — Similar items that are purchased by many Departments, in particular general office supplies, should be purchased centrally by either Finance and/or Administration and if not charged to central services, will be allocated or charged back to each recipient department. 1.7. Cooperative Purchasing — The City may contract for the purchase of supplies, materials, or equipment without regard to the competitive bidding requirements if the purchase is through a national association's purchasing alliance or a state, county or other cooperative created by a joint powers agreement that purchases items from more than one source on the bases of competitive bids. While this eliminates the need for separate bidding on an item, it is yet necessary to get Finance Director, City Manager and Council authorization when purchases ever- $AAA $20,000 or over are to be made, or City Manager and Finance Director approval for purchases up to but not including $20,000$15,000. 1.8. Emergency Purchases — Occasions may arise where purchases $20,000 or over must be made before the Council can approve them and where the required public bidding cannot be done. Where such a purchase is made, Council approval must yet be obtained before payment is made. An emergency must be a situation arising suddenly and unexpectedly which requires speedy action essential to health, safety and welfare of the community, and not just an inconvenience (Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of Stuntz, 257 N.W.2d. 295 [Minn., 1977]). 1.9. Delegation of Authority for Paving Claims – The City Council has delegated authority for paying claims to the City Manager and the Finance Director or their assistants in the absence of the City Manager of Finance Director pursuant to Section 412.271, subdivision 8. A requirement for the delegation by the City Council of its authority to review claims before payment is that it shall have internal accounting and administrative control procedures to ensure proper disbursement of public funds, which procedure shall include regular and frequent review of the actions of the City Manager and Finance Director by the City Council. A list of all claims paid by the City under this paragraph shall be presented to the Council for informational purposes only at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting after payment of the claim. Y. NIMBI ON NIMBI ON \ - • • 1 1 � • - - - �:i�ni�i•- (iii) The tetal afneunt estimated te be expended ever- the pur-ehasing period- may be lv�c bhH4c " 7 '"Os individual I. P-" > instead ef .. - - �7'- - FMc JIM (iii) The tetal afneunt estimated te be expended ever- the pur-ehasing period- may be lv�c bhH4c " 7 '"Os �1; -- NOW"MI .. - - �7'- - FMc JIM • .... (vi) The Geuneil .hall appr-eve e eh p .ehase pr-ieF t„ ,:s1uf:se.e..t e f funds; 1.11. Splitting Purchases — Do not split purchases in an attempt to circumvent any purchasing requirements. 1.12. Imprest Fund/Petty Cash —Certain purchases can be more economically handled through use of petty cash funds to reimburse for purchases. The maximum allowable purchase through any such fund is $50. The cashier /custodian of each such fund is solely responsible for accounting for expenditures from the fund under his or her control. No salaries or personal employee expenses shall be paid from such fund. Any payment from any such fund not approved by the City Manager and Finance Director is the personal obligation of the cashier /custodian of that fund. (Minn. Stat. § 412.271, Subd. 5). 1.13. Prompt Past — The City must pay bills within 35 days of receipt unless a good faith dispute exists. The date of receipt is the date of completed delivery of the goods or services, of satisfactory installation or assembly, or of the receipt of the invoice for the delivery of goods, 7 whichever is latest. If bills are not paid within the standard payment period, interest at one and one –half percent per month must be calculated and paid. The minimum monthly interest penalty on the unpaid balance of any overdue bill of $100 or more is $10. For unpaid balances less than $100 the actual interest should be calculated and paid. Vendors must be notified of invoice errors within 10 days of receiving the invoice. In cases of delayed payments due to good faith disputes with vendors, no interest penalties accrue. If payments are delayed but not in good faith, the vendor may recover costs and attorneys' fees. (Minn. Stat. § 471.425). 1.14. Sales Tax and Other Applicable Taxes —The City of Edina is exempt from paying sales or excise taxes on certain purchases. Most vendors have forms that can be filled out to certify tax exemption, or a letter can be sent to the vendor if the purchase is exempt. 1.15. Non Discrimination — All contracts for materials, supplies or construction must contain a contractor's agreement not to discriminate against prospective employees because of race, creed or color (Minn. Stat. § 181.59). 1.16. Worker's Compensation Insurance — A contract for the doing of "public work" may not be entered into before receiving, from all contracting parties, acceptable evidence of compliance with the worker's compensation insurance coverage requirements of state law (Minn. Stat. § 176.182). 1.17. Progress Payments; Retainage — A progress payment is not an acceptance or approval of any work or waiver of any defects. An amount may be reserved as retainage from any progress payment on a public contract for a public improvement. The amount of retainage may not exceed five percent of the payment. (Minn. Stat. § 15.71 and § 429.041, Subd. 6). At the contractor's option, the retainage shall be paid to the contractor, and the contractor may deposit bonds or securities in lieu of the retainage. If the City incurs additional costs as a result of this option, the City may recover the costs by reducing the final contract payment. (See Minn. Stat. § 15.73) 1.18. Withholding — Before final payment is made, the Contractor, as required by Minn. Stat. § 290.97, must make a satisfactory showing of compliance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 290.92 regarding withholding of state income taxes for wages paid employees on the project. A certificate from the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue will satisfy this requirement. 1.19. Prevailing Wage Rates —If the projector work is funded in whole or in part with State Aid funds, the contract must require the Contractor to pay the prevailing wages. Also, the Contractor's bid proposal must contain a letter or certificate so agreeing to pay prevailing wages. Prevailing wage information can be obtained from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, 443 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4306 (phone: 651/296- 2282). 1.20. Change Orders — Change orders to contracts and purchase orders approved by the Council or City Manager shall be made pursuant to the following policies and procedures and the use of any one of the methods set out at c. through g. following: a. Authorized Persons — The only persons authorized to sign and approve change orders on behalf of the City are the City Manager, the Assistant City Manager, the City Engineer and the Finance Director (the "Authorized Persons "). 8 b. Council Approval — All change orders shall be approved by the Council prior to signing by any Authorized Person except as otherwise provided in this paragraph 1.20. No payment of any change order shall be made without prior Council approval, except as allowed by paragraph 1.9. C. Decreasing Cost — Change orders decreasing the cost of any contract made by the City may be signed and approved on behalf of the City by any Authorized Person without prior Council approval. d. Increases Up To $899 20,000 — Any change order which increases the contract price by less than $20,000 $ c,nnn yes. may be signed and approved on behalf of the City by any Authorized Person with prior approval of the City Manager. e. Emergencies — Any change order which, due to an emergency, cannot be deferred until the Council can approve it, may be signed and approved by any Authorized Person without prior Council approval. (See paragraph 1.8 for additional comments.) f. Avoidance of Loss — Any change order which cannot be deferred until the Council can approve it without loss to the City may be signed and approved by any Authorized Person if the change order is endorsed for payment by at least three members of the Council. g. Up to 10% — Any change order which does not exceed 10% of the original contract price, by itself or in the aggregate with all then prior change orders relating to that same contract, may be signed and approved by any Authorized Person without prior Council approval, provided the contract provides for change orders. Note: change orders that materially change the terms of a contract may be deemed a new contract and may have to be rebid and receive prior Council approval. If in doubt, check with the City Manager and City Attorney. 1.21. Unit Price Contracts — Some contracts for the purchase of goods or for construction are based on the unit price times the estimated number of units without a maximum dollar cost stated. At times the estimate is too low and additional units are added and must be paid for. The following policies apply to such contracts: a. The estimate of units should be carefully made, and should be on the high end of any estimated range of units needed; b. The contract shall be presented to the Council as a "unit price basis" contract with an estimated maximum dollar cost; C. The procedure in paragraph 1.4 applicable to the estimated maximum cost shall be complied with; and ON d. Any increase in units purchased necessary to fulfill and perform the purpose of the contract, and, therefore, in contract cost, beyond the estimated maximum shall be deemed a part of the approved contract, and shall not be deemed a change order, but no payment for any units in excess of the estimated maximum shall be made without prior Council approval. PART II: Policies and Reauirements Applicable to Competitive Biddine Process. 2.1. When Useable — While mandated for certain purchases, the use of competitive bidding is not limited to the mandated areas and can be used more extensively, but should not be used for amounts under $15,00020,000 as the cost of the process is significant. If the City fails to advertise for bids when the law requires competitive bidding, the contract is void, but the City must pay for any benefits it received. 2.2. When Bidding is Required — All contracts for the purchase or rental of supplies, materials or equipment, or for the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of real or personal property, when the estimated amount of the contract is $100.000 or over °°°°°as $35,000, or- $25,000 fer- an e?ipeRditWe fer- a pr-ejerst te be speeially assessedd imdtar- A4iR;; Stat Gh pter- 429, require competitive bids. (Minn. Stat. § 471.345). Also, if the eest is estimated to exeeed $10,000, the contract must be let to the lowest responsible bidder. (Minn. Stat. § 412.311). 2.3. Specifications— For the purposes of informing potential bidders, specifications should outline precisely and in detail what is to be purchased or constructed. These need to be reasonably specific, but not to the point of eliminating competing types and qualities. (Minn. Stat. § 471.35). Violation of this restriction is a gross misdemeanor. (Minn. Stat. § 471.37). A brand name may be specified, but potential bidders must be able to bid an equal product. In addition to the specifications for the purchase, instructions to bidders and general conditions (&ee should be updated, modified as needed and included in the bid package so that all contractual obligations of both parties are known. Competitive bids must be re –let when there is a material change in the terms or specifications, even if you believe that the change would have no effect on the rank order of the bids received. Caution should be taken before determining whether the term or specification change is material or not. The proposals and specifications must allow free and full competition. They may not give a prospective bidder an unfair advantage over any other. Specifications must be sufficiently definite and precise to afford a basis for comparable bids. If the number of units needed cannot be determined, bids should be requested on a unit basis. (See paragraph 1.21 for additional comments on unit price contracts). 2.4. Bid Bonds — ' ,,;e-Even when not required by statute, the City of Edina may require a bid bond, certified check or cashier's check in lieu to insure that the bid will be honored and not withdrawn for up to a specified number of days. The bond or check is usually set at 10% of the purchase price. 2.5. Performance Bonds and Payment Bonds — Unless the amount of the contract is $44;000 75.000 or less, any contract for the doing of any "public work" is not valid unless both a performance bond and payment bond are given as required by Minn. Stat. § 574.26. The City forms should be used. The City forms are available from the City Clerk. 10 2.6. Notice — For all contracts requiring advertising for bids, legal notice must be published in the City's official newspaper at least once 10 days before the last day for submission of bids. (Minn. Stat. § 412.311). If a project to be specially assessed under Minn. Stat. Chapter 429 is estimated to exeeed- be $100,000 or over, then publication must be made at least once in the official newspaper, and at least once in a newspaper published in the City of Minneapolis or a trade paper (as defined in Minn. Stat. § 429.041, Subd. 1), not less than three weeks before the last date for submission of bids. For construction contracts and heavy equipment purchases, notices should also be published in the Construction Bulletin . Non –legal notices may be included in such publications as the League of Minnesota Cities magazine for wider coverage. 2.7. Notice Information — The published notice should contain the following information (Minn. Stat. § 429.041, Subd. 1): a. A description of the project or purchase; b. The availability of specifications in the office of the City Clerk or the office of the department that is managing the bidding_ process; C. The last day for submission of bids and the place where they are due; d. The time and the place for the opening of bids; e. That no bid will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk, and accompanied by the check or bid bond as required by the City; and f. That the City reserves the right to reject any or all bids, and any or all alternative bids. 2.8. Bid Opening and Award — On the date and at the time for opening of bids, all bids should be opened and read for interested parties. The opening should be scheduled at least three (3) working days before the Council meeting (typically the Thursday before) for inclusion in Council packets. Bids should be tabulated on the x,000- Request for Purchase form (APPENDIX A). It is important that all bid proposals be studied carefully prior to making recommendations to the Council for the award of bid. Recommendation on award of bid should be made not only on price, but on quality and quantity as specified and also on responsibility (See "Lowest Responsible Bidder" below). The award should go to the lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications. Once the bid is awarded by the Council, all bid results should be available to anyone requesting them. Construction Bulletin should be informed on items advertised in that publication. Once the Council accepts the lowest responsible bidder and awards the contract, a contract exists even if the written contract is not formally signed. 2.9. Splitting Contracts — You must not attempt to avoid the bidding requirements by splitting a contract into several contracts, each of which is below the minimum amount requiring bids. If materials or work logically fall into two separate contracts because they involve separate transactions, as for the service of contractors specializing in different kinds of work, there is no reason why the contracts cannot be separated and dealt with separately. If splitting the purchase 11 into separate contracts serves no specific purpose except to reduce the amount of the contract to less than the applicable minimum, the contract could be considered invalid. 2.10. Rejecting Bids — The City may and should reserve the right to reject any or all bids, or to waive immaterial informalities or irregularities. Unless the bid responds to the specifications in all material respects, it is not a bid, but a new proposition that should be rejected. 2.11. Lowest Responsible Bidder — "Responsible" in bid statutes, means not only financial responsibility but also integrity, skill, and the likelihood of the bidder's doing faithful and satisfactory work. Value does not always depend on price alone. Where plans and specifications demand consideration of several factors and no single bid is lowest in all these factors, weight should be given to the various factors, and, considering all of them, accept what is deemed to be the lowest responsible bid. 2.12. Opening and Tabulating Bids — The bidding process should be kept open until the time and date deadline has expired. The process of opening and tabulating bids must be open to the public. 2.13. When Bidding is Unnecessary — It is not necessary for the City to advertise for bids for: a. Professional services such as engineers, lawyers, architects, accountants, and other services requiring technical, scientific, or professional training; b. The purchase or lease of real estate; C. Non —competitive products which are patented or obtainable from only one source. (Minn. Stat. § 471.36); d. For insurance generally (except that group insurance requires published notice seeking competitive proposals). (Minn. Stat. § 471.6161); e. The purchase, lease, sale, or other acquisition or disposition of equipment, supplies, materials, or other property, including real property from or to the United States of America, or any agency thereof, or any agency of the State of Minnesota, or any political subdivision of Minnesota. (Minn. Stat. § 471.64); f. Contracts for "guaranteed energy savings" where the contractor guarantees the energy cost savings of insulation, or efficient heating or cooling systems, will be greater than the cost of the product. (Minn. Stat. § 471.345, Subd. 13); and g. If Edina establishes a set aside program for buying goods and services from economically disadvantaged persons or from rehabilitation facilities, contracts can be made to such supplier without bidding, subject to some limitations. (Minn. Stat. § 471.345, Subd. 8 and 12). 2.14. Other Provisions — The provisions of paragraphs 1. 13, 1.14, 1.15, 1.16, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, 1.20 and 1.21 also apply to this Part II. 12 i (Revised August 1997) (Approved by City Council, '1991 and revisions approved July 7, 1997) CITY OF EDINA POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR DISPOSITION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY Requirements — The sale or disposal of property that has lawfully come into the possession of the City, and all City property in need of disposal, shall be disposed of via the following means. The sale of real estate is not included in these requirements. Also, property valued over $100,000 must be bid. Other 1 ?property for disposal is divided into categories by method of receipt as follows: 1) If purchased by the City, the material can be disposed of by any means the City determines, including the auctions below set out; and 2) Property obtained incident to law enforcement actions, abandoned or turned over to the City as lost and remaining unclaimed for over 60 days may be disposed of after that time period at public auction or by private sale to certain nonprofit organizations. (Section 155 of City Code). 3) In the case of abandoned vehicles, the City shall comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. Chapter 168B in selling such vehicles. 4) In the case of property forfeited to the City pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.531 through § 609.5317, the City shall comply with the provisions of said statutes in disposing of such property. Auction — The City may hold an auction, as needed, to dispose of all material not disposed of in any other manner. Sale of Unclaimed Prope!U by Private Sale — The City may enter into contracts with nonprofit organizations that have a significant mission of community involvement for the purpose of disposing of unclaimed property through the sale of such property by such nonprofit organization. Any contract with a nonprofit organization for the disposition of unclaimed property must be approved by the City Council. Cooperative County Auction — A vehicle no longer needed by the City should be disposed of at the Cooperative County Auction(s) during the May —October time frame. Participation may hinge on participation in city vehicle purchases. _ 2 cll6ti6Tr D..epeFty may be disposed e f b y a pleyee L.: 1� :F the Ile.., ..,a:t: „., ., met- 13 .. 13 2) The bids must be submit4ed in a sealed eavelope; and 14 Appendix A REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. Put Item # From: Name of Author Title Date: Date of Meeting Subject: Exact Wording As Shown On Agenda Item Description: DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE Insert Date Here or Type NA Insert Date Here or Type NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Insert Name of Contractor/Vender Here Insert Contract Sale Amt Here GENERAL INFORMATION: Type a description of the purchase, need, etc. here Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget Department John Wallin, Finance Director Gordon Hughes, City Manager A. City of Edina, Minnesota FINANCE DEPARTMENT ore 4801 West 50`h Street DATE: March 4, 2010 Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612)927 -8861 FAX (952)826 -0390 P.O. NUMBER: 0 PURCHASE REQUISITION Deliver Material To: Appendix B Address: Material Needed Bv: 20 Suaaested /Usual Source: Address: Quantity Description Unit Cost Total Cost Acct. Code $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subtotal: Assemble & Delivery: Tax: Total: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Alternate Quotations for Purchases Over $10,000 SOURCES: AMOUNTS OF QUOTATIONS: 1. State of MN Cooperative Purchasing (REQUIRED EXCEPT FOR SERVICES) 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD: APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER: Date: 2117/2010 To: Ship to: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 Appendix C PURCHASE ORDER No. Must appear on all invoices, packing lists and packages. INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS: THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE ANY INVOICE WHICH HAS NOT BEEN RENDERED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS HEREIN. USE SEPARATE INVOICES FOR EACH PURCHASE ORDER. Terms and /or Conditions: (i.e. contract numbers DELIVERY IS AT THE VENDOR'S RISK. GOODS ARE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND RETURN IF FOUND INFERIOR TO SPECIFICATIONS AND REASONABLE STANDARD QUALITY. Quantity Description Unit Cost Total Cost Acct. Code $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subtotal: Assemble & Delivery: Tax: Total: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 THE CITY OF EDINA IS EXEMPT FROM PAYMENT OF ALL FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES, FEDERAL ID# 41- 6005118. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ALL PRICES FOB EDINA. THE CITY SHALL BE ADVISED IF SHIPMENT CANNOT BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. UPON SHIPMENT, INVOICE IN DUPLICATE SHOWING OUR PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER AND MAIL TO: CITY OF EDINA, ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 AUTHORIZATION FINANCE DEPARTMENT -i�1r� o e Cl) y \roRPORPTv� ia88 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. B From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Action Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -29 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of _the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -29 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-29 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Ginkel Properties Management $125.00 In memory of Jane Manick Staff JoAnn & Thomas Pirsch $25.00 Greer Garden Edward Wick Computer Components Edina Park Department: DOW Water & Process Solutions$6,000.00 Recycling Receptacles Lewis & Pamela Parks Dated: March 16, 2010 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 16, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120—. City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 ' ,; NA, OV1 Oil, A out 0 RE PO RURECO M M E N DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV C. From: Ceil Smith Assistant to the City Manager ® Action Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Ordinance No. 2010 -06 Amending Section 150 Regarding Temporary Seasonal Employees Personnel Ordinance ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is recommending that the City's Code be amended to remove Temporary Part-time employees from being eligible for paid holidays. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The managers of various facilities and programs that utilize temporary part -time employees have asked for this amendment, because it seems to be economically inappropriate that employees, that generally work between 90 and 100 days during the Spring, Summer, and early Fall months, receive three paid holidays. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 2010 -06 An Ordinance amending Section 150.15 of the City Code concerning rest periods and holidays. I ' r� f AO I ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 150.15 OF THE CITY CODE CONCERNING REST PERIODS AND HOLIDAYS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 150.15 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Subd. 2 Holidays. The following calendar days and such other days as designated by the Council are paid holidays New Year's Day — January 1; Martin Luther King Jr. Day —the third Monday in January; President's Day — the third Monday in February; Memorial Day — the last Monday in May; Independence Day — July 4; Labor Day — the first Monday in September; Veteran's Day — November 11; Thanksgiving Day — the fourth Thursday in November; the Friday after Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day — December 25. Also one -half day on Christmas Eve — December 24, and one -half day on New Year's Eve — December 31, shall be paid holidays whenever they fall on one of the days Monday through Friday. When New Year's Day, Independence Day, Veteran's Day or Christmas Day fall on Saturday, the preceding Friday is the holiday, and should these days fall on Sunday, the following Monday shall be the holiday. All regular full -time employees entitled to time off with full pay on holidays. City Hall shall be closed for business on each such holiday, but employees may be required to work on paid holidays when the nature of their duties or other conditions require. An employee required to work on a holiday shall receive another day off within 30 days as the department head determines unless consideration is given to this factor in determining work schedules. Each holiday commences at the beginning of the first shift on the on which the holiday occurs and continues for 24 hours. Eligible employees shall receive pay for official holidays at their normal rate of pay if they are at work or on leave of absence with pay the last regular day or shift to which they were or would have been assigned prior to the holiday and the first regular day or shift to which they were or would have been assigned following the holiday. In addition to meeting the foregoing criteria, regular part-time employees, , are entitled to pay on a holiday only if they world normally be scheduled to work on the day if they would normally be- scheduled to work on the day of the week designated as the holiday and they shall be .paid only for the number. of hours they would have worked. The Manager in the Manager's discretion may grant paid holiday _to individuals for the celebration of certain religious holy days observed by their particular faith. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: March 16, 2010 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 0 0 w91�1� o e , • POPA't4'9/ lass RE PO RPRECO M M E N DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. D. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -30 Authorizing Application To Make Two Edina Polling Locations Accessible For EAID Grant Funds ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The State of Minnesota Office of the Secretary of State is currently soliciting grant proposals for automatic door openers to make polling places in Minnesota more accessible. The Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Developmental Disabilities, Administration for Children and Families, Election Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities (EAID) has allocated monies to be given in grants to local governments to install the automatic door openers at local polling facilities improving accessibility. I intend to apply for grants to install openers at Weber Park and at Arneson Acres. I have been working with Superintendent Vince Cockriel and have solicited the necessary quotes. In order to apply for these funds the Council must authorize the application and subsequent agreement if we are successful in obtaining the grants. ' The resolution the Secretary's office is requesting is somewhat confusing because it refers to Help America Vote Act (HAVA) funding, but as I understand it, this is because the Secretary's Office must account for the monies as HAVA monies. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -30 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -30 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR HAVA ACCESSIBILITY GRANT ' ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina The city council is hereby authorized to: a) Apply for a grant from the Office of the Secretary of State of Minnesota for Federal funds pursuant to Title II, Section 261 of the Help America Vote Act for the sole purpose of improving access to polling places in this city for persons with disabilities; b) Enter into an agreement with the Office of the Secretary of State governing the receipt, expenditure, reimbursement and reporting of such a grant; c) Receive and account separately in a manner sufficient to meet generally accepted government accounting principles sufficient to pass federal audit; and d) Expend any sums received in the manner indicated in the grant application and agreement with the Office of the Secretary of State. No further action by a city council meeting is required for actions related to this grant. Dated: March 16, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 16, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. 10 City Clerk • City Hall a 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -31 RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE PHASED IMPROVEMENTS OF THE 1- 494/TH -169 INTERCHANGE, S.P. 2776 -03 City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has prepared a final [phased] layout for the improvement of 1- 494/TH -169 within the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Edina on TH -169 from 1.5 miles south of 1-494 to 0.5 miles north of Valley View Road, and on 1-494 from Prairie Center Drive to West Bush Lake Road and seeks approval thereof; and WHEREAS, said final layouts are on file in the Minnesota Department of Transportation Office, Waters Edge, 1500 W. County Road B -2, Roseville, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, and identified as Layout No. 5B, S.P. 2776 -03 from TH 169 R.P. 120 +00.692 to 123 +00.6; and 1-494 from R.P. 011 +00.349 to 009 +00.556 dated February 4, 2010; and WHEREAS, Layout No. 513 has been modified to reflect new traffic information and the phasing of the 1- 494/TH -169 interchange, and these modifications do not affect the March 26, 2007 Municipal Consent pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.64, subd. 2; and WHEREAS, Layout No. 513 does not include modifications to the interchange of Valley View Road and Trunk Highway 169; WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has provided a "good faith" cost estimate of $1,339,972 for the City of Edina's share of these improvements, not including public utility relocation costs; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested that the City formally indicate its intent to participate in these costs; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation is responsible for all right -of -way costs associated with roadway improvements for this project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.164, the City of Edina previously held in 2007 a public hearing to consider layout approval and subsequent Municipal Consent of said improvements; and WHEREAS, Municipal Consent was granted for the 1- 494/TH -169 project on December 19, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that considering available information, studies, and input received, acknowledging receipt of the phased implementation and supports the Minnesota Department of City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 Transportation's efforts to construct -this project as quickly as possible, hereby acknowledges the phased implementation of the construction of the 1- 494/TH -169 interchange as shown in Layout 5B dated February 4, 2010. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City understands that improvements to the interchange of Valley View Road and Trunk Highway 169 will be analyzed with the. phased implementation of the overall -interchange of 1- 494/TH -169; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City agrees to participate in costs associated with this project as noted above. The City of Edina understands that the estimated City - share listed herein represents a "good faith" estimate, but will be finalized during preparation of the cooperative construction agreement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the- City of Edina will continue to work cooperatively toward a mutually agreeable cooperative construction agreement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Edina will work cooperatively toward the construction and completion of this project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Edina authorizes City staff to work with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to make any necessary minor modifications to the layout during the design and construction phases of the said improvements. Dated: March 16, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 16, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk REPO RPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action Discussion ❑ Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Resolution 2010 -31 Acknowledging the Phase Improvements of the I- 4941THA 69 Interchange ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution 2010 -31 Acknowledging the Phase Improvements of the I- 4941TH -169 Interchange. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) along with the cities of Edina, Eden Prairie and Bloomington are pursuing federal funding for the reconstruction of the 1 -494 / TH -169 interchange project. As you might recall the City Council in March of 2007 approved the Municipal Consent for this project. The current plan is a phased plan whereas the major movement from eastbound 1 -494 to northbound TH -169 along with the reverse movement will not be included in the first phase of the project. The current design will allow for an easy addition of the infrastructure if this movement is needed in the future. Staff of all four agencies believes that this movement is taken care of with the use of TH -212 and 1-494. The current plan also does not include modifications to the interchange of Valley View Road and TH -169. MNDOT had proposed minor changes to this interchanged based on traffic forecasts from last year's traffic counts; earlier forecasts had indicated a need for additional modifications to this interchange. Staff from both Edina and Eden Prairie agrees that this interchange should be analyzed once the major interchange is completed. MNDOT has agreed that language will be included in the Cooperative Agreement delaying work at this interchange. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2010 -31 Acknowledging the Phase Improvements of the 1- 4941TH -169 Interchange g:\ engineering \infrastructure%treets\mndot \169 494 interchange\2010 issue\resolution\20100316 item iv a rr i494 th169 resolution.docx s„ RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -31 RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE PHASED IMPROVEMENTS OF THE 1- 494/TH -169 INTERCHANGE, S.P. 2776 -03 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has prepared a final [phased] layout for the improvement of 1- 494/TH -169 within the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Edina on TH -169 from 1.5 miles south of 1 -494 to 0.5 miles north of Valley View Road, and on 1 -494 from Prairie Center Drive to West Bush Lake Road and seeks approval thereof; and WHEREAS, said final layouts are on file in the Minnesota Department of Transportation Office, Waters Edge, 1500 W. County Road B -2, Roseville, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, . and identified as Layout No. 5B, S.P. 2776 -03 from TH 169 R.P. 120 +00.692 to 123 +00.6; and 1-494 from R.P. 011+00.349 to 009 +00.556 dated February 4, 2010; and WHEREAS, Layout No. 5B has been modified to reflect new traffic information and the phasing of the 1- 494/TH -169 interchange, and these modifications do not affect the March 26, 2007 Municipal Consent pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.64, subd. 2; and WHEREAS, Layout No. 5B does not include modifications to the interchange of Valley View Road and Trunk Highway 169; WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department cost estimate of $1,339,972 for the City of including public utility relocation costs; and of Transportation has provided a "good faith" Edina's share of these improvements, not WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested that the City formally indicate its intent to participate in these costs; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation is responsible for all right -of- way costs associated with roadway improvements for this project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.164, the City of Edina previously held in 2007 a public hearing to consider layout approval and subsequent Municipal Consent of said improvements; and WHEREAS, Municipal Consent was granted for the 1 -494/TH -169 project on March 26, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that considering available information, studies, and input received, acknowledging receipt of the phased implementation and supports the Minnesota Department of Transportation's efforts to construct this project as quickly as possible, hereby acknowledges the phased '! ' 4% implementation of the construction of the 1- 494/TH -169 interchange as shown in Layout 5B dated February 4, 2010. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City understands that improvements to the interchange of Valley View Road and Trunk Highway 169 will be analyzed with the phased implementation of the overall interchange of 1- 494/TH -169; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City agrees to participate in costs associated with this project as noted above. The City of Edina understands that the estimated City share listed herein represents a "good faith" estimate, but will be finalized during preparation of the cooperative construction agreement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Edina will continue to work cooperatively toward a mutually agreeable cooperative construction agreement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Edina will work cooperatively toward the construction and completion of this project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Edina authorizes City staff to work with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to make any necessary minor modifications to the layout during the design and construction phases of the said improvements. Dated: March 16, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 16, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of '20, City Clerk { me REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.F. From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator ® Action F] Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of March 3, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, March 3, 2010. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Staff Review for March 3, 2010. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, March 3, 2010 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on March 3, 2010. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Police Traffic Supervisor. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the March 16, 2010, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval of request: None for Wednesday, March 3, 2010 meeting. SECTION B• Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: 1. Request for an overhead pedestrian bridge crossing Xerxes Avenue at West 64th Street, or at the very least, a painted pedestrian crosswalk at this location. This request comes from a resident on the 6400 block of Xerxes Avenue who represents the East Central Edina Residents Association. This newly formed association represents residents south of Highway 62 and north of West 66th Street along Xerxes and York Avenues. The requestor states that Xerxes Avenue traffic is so heavy that it makes it impossible for pedestrians to cross at West 64th Street. Requestor states that many residents in this area are seniors and cross Xerxes Avenue to use the businesses at Southdale Square. This request, along with several others for the same location, were first heard by the Traffic Safety Committee on January 6, 2010. At that time, all requests within the jurisdiction of the City of Edina were addressed and the requestor was referred to Hennepin County with the request for a Traffic Safety Staff Review March 3, 2010 Page 1 of 2 G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 030310 pedestrian crosswalk crossing Xerxes Avenue because Xerxes Avenue, at this location, is a Hennepin County roadway (CSAH 31). Hennepin County staff has now referred this request back to Edina for opinion/input on this request. Xerxes Avenue is a `B" Minor Arterial roadway with an average Monday - Friday daily traffic count of 20,100 vehicles (The County does not have publicized speed data at this location). The Edina Police Department enforces speed at this exact location and reports that speeds are frequently in excess of 40 MPH. Xerxes Avenue has curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides. Xerxes Avenue has a span of 110 feet with a fairly wide center median. There have been four reported accidents at this location in the past five years (One injury, one possible injury, and two property damage). City crosswalk policy states that pedestrian crosswalks "Shall not be located on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 MPH unless in conjunction with signalization." Any pedestrian crosswalk at this location would have to be accompanied by a traffic signal. A pedestrian crosswalk with a traffic signal is currently located two blocks to the south at West 60h Street. The request for an overhead pedestrian bridge and a traffic signal will be referred back to Hennepin County. Staff recommends denial of the request for a sainted pedestrian crosswalk crossing Xerxes Avenue at West 64'h Street for lack of warrants. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. None for Wednesday, March 3, 2010 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review March 3, 2010 Page 2 of 2 G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 030310 . L TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2010 The following requests were received and acted upon during the month of February 2010. 02/09/10 Request to check on the timing of a traffic signal. 02/09/10 Parking concerns from a resident who lives across the street from a major construction project. 02/12/10 Concerns from a resident regarding traffic volumes and speeds on residential street. 02/12/10 Stop sign is partially blocked by a tree branch and difficult to see. 02/16/10 Concerns from two residents about speed and volume of traffic on Metro Blvd. 02/24/10 Traffic safety concerns from a resident regarding eight different locations in the City. Referred by the Transportation commission. 02/24/10 Request for a sign directing traffic to the Public Safety Training Facility. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 1 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332123 311/2010 122472 M & I BANK 15.00 SUPPLIES /SERVICES 231157 021510 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 138.26 SUPPLIES /SERVICES 231157 021510 7414.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 271.47 SUPPLIES /SERVICES 231157 021510 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE 776.71 SUPPLIES /SERVICES 231157 021510 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,201.44 332124 3/4/2010 100613 AAA 9.50 TABS FOR 26-189 231339 022610 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.50 332125 3/4/2010 125198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 29.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231529 030110 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 29.00 332126 3/412010 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 769.00 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEE 231126 0012696 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,171.70 FSA / HRA RENEWAL FEES 231127 0012586 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,940.70 332127 3/4/2010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 37.25 231195 0805205 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 32.00 231196 0805201 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 69.25 332128 3/412010 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 32.92 ALARM SERVICE 231340 09015020 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 32.92 332129 314/2010 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHICS INC. 161.58 TONER CARTRIDGES 231236 INV00095999 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 181.58 332130 31412010 103160 AL'S VACUUM 97.06 VACUUM HOSES 231379 24225 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 97.06 332131 3/4/2010 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 2,302.79 RM -1 REMOTE METERS 00001753 231180 100074 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 1,866.04 VACUUM REGULATORS 00001752 231181 100073 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 4,168.83 R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE CITY OF EDINA RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION Council Check Register RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 332132 31412010 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 1,603.13 HOSES 00003679 231380 17308 1470.6406 1,603.13 332133 3/4/2010 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 672.20 HAND DRYER REPAIR 00002210 231381 6676 5620.6180 672.20 332134 31412010 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 417.04 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 231268 ALERTINV12398 2210.6103 417.04 332135 31412010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 15.00 SUPPLIES 231443 022610 5110.6564 405.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231443 022610 5110.6103 420.00 332136 314/2010 103285 AMEM 100.00 2010 DUES 231341 022510 1460.6105 100.00 332137 31412010 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 343.10 COPIER PAPER 231071 10233361 -00 1550.6406 343.10 332138 31412010 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,311.27 RACKMOUNT U2 UPS 231377 13922 2310.6230 1,311.27 332139 3/4/2010 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 52.50 RADIO REPAIR 00001796 231128 14022 1553.6237 87.14 RADIO REPAIR 00001796 231129 14023 1553.6237 192.50 RADIO REPAIR 00001796 231130 14024 1553.6237 157.50 RADIO REPAIR 00001796 231131 14025 1553.6237 89.64 RADIO REPAIR 00001796 231132 14026 1553.6237 262.50 RADIO REPAIR 00001796 231133 14027 1553.6237 157.50 _RADIO REPAIR 00001796 231134 14038 1553.6237 999.28 332140 31412010 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 6,293.00 PREMIUM 231135 6100000118251 1550.6200 6,293.00 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/312010 8:04:26 Page- 2 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CIVILIAN DEFENSE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/1/2010 -- 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332141 31412010 124507 APPROVED EQUAL CO. 600.00 THERMOSTAT WIRING 231382 10517 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 600.00 332142 3/4/2010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 153.10 COFFEE 231237 415531 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 153.10 332143 31412010 121019 ASCE 225.00 DUES - JACK SULLIVAN 231294 012610 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 225.00 332144 3/4/2010 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 815.00 WATER RESOURCES MGMT 231269 23271072.00 -6 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 815.00 332145 31412010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 826.28 231109 52246800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 207.98 231110 83323900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7.53 231111 83324000 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 102.80 231112 52239400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 72.55 231113 83324300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 115.53 231114 5906600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 708.25 231197 52241500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 432.10 231481 52333100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,473.02 332146 3/412010 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 267.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231444 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 267.00 332147 3/412010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 45.97 FILE STORAGE BOXES 231136 OE- 219543 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 63.38 STAPLES 231238 WO- 605155 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 342.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 231239 WO- 605308 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 27.42 STORAGE FILES 231270 OE- 219583 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 197.52 MAILERS, LABELS 231271 OE- 219026 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 43.01- RETURN 231272 CP- OE- 219026 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 633.80 332148 3/412010 125209 BISEK, KATIE R55CKREG LOG20000 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CITY OF EDINA 248.27 Council Check Register 00001517 231140 368698 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 210.42 Check # Date Amount Supplier-/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GEN 210.42 73.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231479 030110 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION 73.00 82.46 FILTER ELEMENTS 00001524 231143 369267 332149 314/2010 EQUIPMENT 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS GEN 29.86 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00001713 231144 377265 8,330.12 FINAL PAYMENT 231137 022610 01363.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALVE 00001642 8,330.12 378663 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION 332150 31412010 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 280.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231445 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 280.00 332151 31412010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 193.37 COPY PAPER 00001799 231342 57778 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 256.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003676 231383 57726 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 450.34 332152 31412010 125248 BONNETT, WALTER 62.16 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 231138 022310 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 62.16 332153 31412010 124677 BORCHERT, SUE 50.00 CLASS REFUND 231139 022310 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 50.00 332154 314/2010 122942 BORNOWSKI, CLAY 108.00 MAINTENANCE 231446 022610 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 108.00 332155 314/2010 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 487.50 231115 98318 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 447.50 231482 98366 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 31312010 8:04:26 Page - 4 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS BA -363 BLAKE RD M &O ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 332156 3/4/2010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 248.27 CONTROL 00001517 231140 368698 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 210.42 BUSHING KIT 00001521 231141 369221X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 210.42 BUSHING KIT 00001521 231142 369221 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 82.46 FILTER ELEMENTS 00001524 231143 369267 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.86 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00001713 231144 377265 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 137.37 VALVE 00001642 231343 378663 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 918.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332157 31412010 123621 BRAEMAR ARENA 187.73 ICE RENTAL 231072 022210 4077.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 187.73 332158 314/2010 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 329.94 INSTRUCTOR AC 231447 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 329.94 332159 3/4/2010 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 786.24 MARCH NEWSLETTER 00008239 231240 20693 1628.6575 PRINTING 786.24 332160 31412010 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 104.00 POT MAINTENANCE 231448 022610 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231448 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 464.00 332161 31412010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Page - 5 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 203.45 231198 19211 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 72.00 231199 19216 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,941.05 231200 19218 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 332162 3/412010 101307 CAREER TRACK 299.00 WORKSHOP 299.00 332163 314/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 462.00 231344 022410 231201 85324 231202 85325 231296 85271 332164 31412010 100681 CATCO 15.56 FITTINGS, TEES 00001714 231146 3 -86372 156.95 HOSES, FITTINGS 00001714 231147 3 -86315 172.51 332165 3/4/2010 112561, CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1400.6104 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 1553.6530 1553.6530 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 205.94 231073 5596524 -2/10 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 56.36 5584310 -6 231148 5584310 -2110 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 2,104.51 5584304 -9 231149 5584304 -2110 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 6 3/1/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,005.05 5546504 -1 231241 5546504 -2110 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 8,279.65 5591458 -4 231242 5591458 -2/10 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 23,132.18 231291 8034001 -2/10 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 36,783.69 332166 314/2010 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 779.14 WIPES, SPONGES, ICE MELT 00008084 231074 515714 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 779.14 332167 314/2010 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 350.00 231203 412256 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 350.00 332168 31412010 125285 CITIZEN OBSERVER 1,500.00 TIP411 231345 847589 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,500.00 332169 3/4/2010 101663 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF 60.00 DUES - JACK SULLIVAN 231295 2010 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 60.00 332170 31412010 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 18,101.00 PHER I & II 231532 022510 4205.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH GRANT PHASE 1&2 34,989.50 PHER 111 231532 022510 4206.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH GRANT PHASE 3 19,365.50 PHEP & CRI 231533 FEB2510 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 72,456.00 332171 314/2010 118580 CITY OF EDINA 25.00 6609 MOHAWK TRAIL -ALARM 231075 ALARM 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.00 332172 31412010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 2,006.93 00103426 - 0345052006 231273 0345052006 -2110 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 296.40 00103426- 0345052024 231274 0345052024 -2/10 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 353.31 00105263- 0335037016 231346 0335037016 - 2/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 2,656.64 332173 3/412010 123941 CLAY, CAROL 144.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231449 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 144.00 332174 3141°-'^ 116304 CLAY, DON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/312010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 7 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 319.75 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 231450 022610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 319.75 332175 314/2010 120167 CLIA LABORATORY PROGRAM 150.00 CERTIFICATION FEE 231384 022510 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 332176 31412010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 461.40 231204 0148034233 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 461.40 332177 31412010 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 91.64 RADIATOR REPAIR 00001338 231182 12411 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.64 332178 31412010 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 61.82 TROWEL, PATCH MATERIAL 00001771 231150 0044181 -IN 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 61.82 332179 3/412010 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 104.14 CLAY & SUPPLIES 00009139 231347 INV000049962 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 865.67 CLAY & SUPPLIES 00009139 231347 INV000049962 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 107.42 CLAY & SUPPLIES 00009144 231348 INV000050515 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 389.64 CLAY & SUPPLIES 00009144 231348 INV000050515 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,466.87 332180 3/4/2010 121464 COPELAND, BARBARA 42.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231451 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 42.00 332181 31412010 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 144.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231452 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 144.00 332182 31412010 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 MARKETING 00006393 231349 164229 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100.00 332183 31412010 125183 CROW RIVER LIGHTING SERVICES 1,876.94 LIGHTING 00008085 231076 117 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,876.94 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 8 3/1/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332184 31412010 102514 CUTTER S BUCK 457.02 POLOS 00006443 231243 91448658 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 457.02 332185 31412010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 22.40 231205 541162 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,148.70 231206 541161 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 961.50 231207 541090 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 231483 541160 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,378.10 231484 541159 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,532.20 332186 31412010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 35.29 FLASHLIGHTS 00001794 231350 459567 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.29 332187 3/412010 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABORS INDUSTRY 3,808.16 SURCHARGE - FEB 2010 231531 8385053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 3,808.16 332188 31412010 104314 DEPOSITORY TRUST S CLEARING CO 1,072.00 DEBT CONFIRMATION 231375 2731 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 1,072.00 332189 31412010 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 1,131.03 BIRTHDAY PARTY INVITES 231385 35439 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,131.03 332190 31412010 122234 DEVRIES, NICHOLAS 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231453 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 288.00 332191 31412010 102831 DEX EAST 241.11 231151 650243624 -2/10 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 18.40 231351 110350670 -2/10 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 259.51 332192 3/4/2010 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,415.19 REFUSE 231244 1077465 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,517.37 REFUSE 231245 1076631 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 6,932.56 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 311/2010 — 314/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332193 3/412010 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 247.08 CAR WASHES 231352 4121 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 247.08 332194 31412010 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 325.42 BEER I WINE 00006338 231246 1004 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 325.42 332195 31412010 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 15.00 GYM RENTAL - PERMIT #34276 231077 9017 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 15.00 332196 31412010 106020 EDINA RESOURCE CENTER 37,200.00 2010 FUNDING 231247 021710 1507.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FAMILINK EDINA 37,200.00 332197 31412010 101731 EDINA SWIM CLUB 75.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK AD 231386 500 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 75.00 332198 3/4/2010 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 57.82 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003669 231387 1251830 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.82 332199 31412010 117375 ESRI 3,000.00 ARCVIEW /ARCINFO MAINTENANCE 231275 92129411 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 3,389.76 ARCVIEW /ARCINFO MAINTENANCE 231275 92129411 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 6,389.76 332200 3/412010 100158 EXPLORE MINNESOTA GOLF ALLIANC 1,900.00 2010 EMGA MEMBER DUES 231248 2010 EMGA 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,900.00 332201 31412010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 176.03 ROTORS, PADS 00001641 231183 1- 3290846 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 379.22 ROTORS, PADS 00001641 231184 69- 005206 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 555.25 332202 314/2010 125286 FLORIDA BIRTHDAYPARTY.COM CORP 99.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK AD 231388 022410 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 99.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/312010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 10 3/1/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332203 3/412010 102727 FORCE AMERICA 980.69 KEYED BOLTS 00001717 231353 01337231 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 980.69 332204 31412010 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 217.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231078 022210 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 217.00 332205 3/412010 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 380.40 INSTRUCTOR AC 231454 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 380.40 332206 31412010 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 1,325.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231455 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,325.00 332207 3/412010 118696 FRYKMAN, LAURA 225.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231456 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 225.00 332208 314/2010 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 132.30 INSTRUCTOR AC 231457 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 132.30 332209 314/2010 124541 GEYEN GROUP 395.44 CARPET CLEANING 00006431 231354 2502 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 395.44 332210 31412010 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 420.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231458 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 420.00 332211 314/2010 119737 GLOCK INC. 94.00 MAG SPRINGS 00003040 231355 535587 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 94.00 332212 31412010 125289 GLOCK PROFESSIONAL INC. 6,000.00 GLOCK ARMORERS COURSE 231432 770- 437 -4715 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 6,000.00 332213 314/2010 102383 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 305.00 MEMBERSHIP 231249 0123001 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 305.00 Page - 11 332214 314/2010 - 3/4/2010 124696 GRACE, LARRY PO # Doc No 14.00 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 225.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 239.00 231459 332215 31412010 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 101103 GRAINGER 00001606 231079 9182863507 412.27 CHARGER, BATTERIES DISTRIBUTION 231152 9.91 BATTERIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 31.70 LAMP 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.86 SCREW GUIDE 9185134732 1301.6556 91.09 CLOCK 00006441 231356 9185466076 171.43 VELCRO GOLF ADMINISTRATION 00002220 231389 238.26 BATTERIES, VELCRO GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 960.52 9181431363 332216 31412010 EDINBOROUGH PARK 120201 GRANICUS INC. 16914 2210.6103 829.64 WEBSTREAMING -MARCH 231485 116818 829.64 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 332217 31412010 116817 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 714.00 030110 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 98.25 231460 022610 5110.6103 812.25 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 332218 31412010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 133.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 133.50 332219 31412010 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 108.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 108.00 332220 31412010 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 1,460.25 INSTRUCTOR AC 1,460.25 332221 31412010 100788 H&L MESABI 547.73 CARBIDE BLADES 547.73 231461 CITY OF EDINA 5110.6103 313/2010 8:04:26 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 79851 Page - 11 REPAIR PARTS 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 231459 022610 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 231459 022610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 00001606 231079 9182863507 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 231152 9182973041 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 00001770 231185 9185134740 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 00001770 231186 9185134732 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 00006441 231356 9185466076 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 00002220 231389 9181980047 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 00002218 231390 9181431363 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 231276 16914 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 231485 116818 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 231486 116817 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 231433 030110 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 231460 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 231461 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 00001710 231153 79851 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/112010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332222 314/2010 101255 HASLER INC. 144.82 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 231154 12410167 1550.6235 POSTAGE 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Page - 12 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 144.82 332223 31412010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,501.25 TONKAZORB 00005451 231277 3095841 5915.6586 2,501.25 332224 3/4/2010 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 10.00 231462 022610 5125.6564 75.00 INSTRUCTION 231462 022610 5125.6103 85.00 332225 31412010 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 73.57 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 231278 2100162 -186 1190.6105 73.57 332226 314/2010 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 235.00 EMT TRAINING 231392 00195505 1470.6104 235.00 EMT TRAINING 231393 00194687 1470.6104 470.00 332227 31412010 101281 HERSHEY, JERRY 42.00 MILEAGE - TRAINING 231176 022310 5919.6104 42.00 332228 314/2010 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 313.96 SOAP, SHOWER FOAM 00002221 231394 6211680 5620.6511 442.42 SCRUBBER BATTERIES 00002212 231395 7300981 5620.6406 132.78 SOAP, RESTROOM CLEANER 00002214 231396 6204188 5620.6511 889.16 332229 3/4/2010 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 40.57 PAINT 00006435 231250 003378649 5420.6406 66.79 PAINT 00006438 231251 003378963 5420.6406 37.42 PAINT 00006438 231252 003379601 5420.6406 144.78 332230 3/412010 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 735.50 231116 512910 5862.5514 1,254.75 231208 513607 5842.5514 712.45 231487 513582 5862.5514 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Page - 12 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 313/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 13 3/1/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,702.70 332231 31412010 105461 HOLL, SHELLEY 100.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 231463 022610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 100.00 332232 31412010 - 103214 HOOTEN CLEANERS 207.05 LAUNDRY 231357 022010 1400.6201 LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 207.05 332233 31412010 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 440.71 ICE MELT '00002216 231397 10020910 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 440.71 332234 3/412010 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 209.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231398 030110 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 209.50 332235 3/412010 125299 HUGHES, ROBERT 1,203.34 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 231478 030110 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,203.34 332236 3/4/2010 101233 IAAPA 539.00 DUES - ANN KATTREH 231399 #342878 5621.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 539.00 332237 31412010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 235.30 FLOURIDE TANKS & PARTS 00001618 231187 595358 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 207.56 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001791 231358 595770 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 442.86 332238 31412010 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. 364.90 OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIR 231400 D212244 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 364.90 332239 31412010 119806 INTEGRA TELECOM 296.16 FEB SERVICE 231155 6513418 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 296.16 332240 31412010 116152 INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB 163.28 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 231279 022510 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 163.28 R55CKREG LOG20000 102146 JESSEN PRESS CITY OF EDINA 95.47 Council Check Register 231292 20878 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 332241 314/2010 207.04 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 23.66 THERMOSTAT 00001761 231188 4261613 -01 5912.6406 23.66 332242 314/2010 231156 102321 JACKSON -HIRSH INC 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.06 LAMINATING SHEETS 00003675 231401 0762900 1470.6406 88.06 332246 31412010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 332243 31412010 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 179.50 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 231178 030410 1419.6102 YORK SELLING 100.00 231209 1357775 313/2010 8:04:26 Page - 14 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 332244 31412010 102146 JESSEN PRESS 95.47 PRINTED ENVELOPES 231292 20878 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 111.57 INVITATIONS 231293 20877 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 207.04 332245 3/412010 125272 JESSEN, SARA 65.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 231156 022310 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 65.00 332246 31412010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 179.50 231117 1357753 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 743.22 231209 1357775 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 141.50 231297 1357781 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,278.84 231298 1357779 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,303.26 231488 1357774 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,646.32 332248 31412010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,775.78 231299 1785270 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 889.50 231300 1785269 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 698.75 231301 1788983 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,662.33 231302 1788985 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,878.32 231303 1788988 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 35.37 231304 1788990 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,607.72 231305 1788986 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 685.04 231306 1788984 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 880.65 231307 1788989 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 785.40 231308 1788979 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 58.24- 231309 449944 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 15 31112010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22.11- 231310 449945 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17.94- 231311 449946 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.45- 231312 449947 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16.00- 231313 449948 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.92- 231314 449949 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.28- 231489 426470 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 224.40 231490 1788987 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 488.12 231491 1788966 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 254.01 231492 1788967 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 9.49- 231493 426390 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,067.19 231494 1788978 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,975.16 231495 1788976 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,059.17 231496 1788970 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35.37 231497 1788971 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 951.26 231498 1788968 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 355.45 231499 1788965 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,391.44 231500 1788964 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.00- 231501 422042 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21,553.00 332249 3/4/2010 118814 JOHNSON, LINNEA 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 231253 022210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.25 332250 3/4/2010 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 4.19 PETTY CASH 231254 022410 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 10.64 PETTY CASH 231254 022410 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 35.23 PETTY CASH 231254 022410 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 40.35 PETTY CASH 231254 022410 5112.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER POTTERY 54.01 PETTY CASH 231254 022410 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 79.29 PETTY CASH 231254 022410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 129.41 PETTY CASH 231254 022410 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 353.12 332251 31412010 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 477.22 PHOTOSHOP ELEMENTS SOFTWARE 231435 021210 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 477.22 332252 31412010 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD W. 160.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 231464 022610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 160.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332253 31412010 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 146.12 THERMOSTAT, CAPS 00001490 231189 044291 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 146.12 332254 31412010 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 76.00 MILEAGE - TRAINING 231173 022310 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 76.00 332265 31412010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 36.99 UNIFORMS 00003653 231402 133542 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 36.99 332256 31412010 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 73.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231530 030110 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 73.65 332257 3/412010 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 120.91 50TH &FRANCE IMPROVEMENT PROJ 231280 4088050 01237.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 120.91 332258 31412010 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD 169.69 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 231403 022610 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.69 332259 31412010 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 DWI TOW 231080 022310 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153.74 332260 31412010 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 8,995.12 PRO LASER 111 231359 410602 2340.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 8,995.12 332261 31412010 101751 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 169.62 POND CLEANER 00002217 231404 1014944676 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 523.99 HAZMAT GEL COVERS 00003668 231405 1014932391 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 693.61 332262 3/4/2010 105531 LAW ENFORCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES 547.00 RICHARD CAMPBELL 00003053 231360 22964672 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 547.00 332263 31412010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Page- 16 Business Unit WELL HOUSES TRAINING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL A -237 50TH &FRANCE RENOVATION PSTF OCCUPANCY DWI FORFEITURE DWI FORFEITURE EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 17 311/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 173.13 HITCH PINS, NIPPLES 00001780 231281 8944792 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 407.62 HOSE CLAMPS, HITCH PINS 00001780 231282 8944791 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 580.75 332264 3/4/2010 125298 LEARMAN, KRISTEN 24.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231465 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 24.00 332265 31412010 100868 LOGIS 1,147.00 231081 31726/31774/318 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 02 3,488.00 231081 31726/31774/318 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 02 3,618.00 231081 31726/31774/318 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 02 4,439.00 231081 31726/31774/318 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 02 4,605.00 231081 31726/31774/318 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 02 7,792.00 231081 31726131774/318 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 02 10,569.00 231081 31726/31774/318 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 02 13,027.00 231081 31726/317741318 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 02 48,685.00 332266 314/2010 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 59.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231480 030110 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 59.00 332267 31412010 100443 LUCHT, PETE 42.00 MILEAGE - TRAINING 231174 022310 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 42.00 332268 31412010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 933.89 .231118 80194 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 933.89 332269 31412010 101165 M.AA.O. 75.00 MEMEBERSHIP - RICHARD NELSON 231283 022410 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 75.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 18 3/1/2010 - 314/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332270 31412010 103206 M/A ASSOCIATES INC. 111.20 BLADES 00003678 231406 2001 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 443.86 CLEANERS 00003678 231407 2000 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 555.06 332271 31412010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 2,105.44 BELTS 00001678 231158 2101141 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.67 TOW BRACKETS 00001790 231361 2101659 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,545.93 FILTERS, CARBURETORS 00001685 231362 2101139 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 252.14 SHIFTER CABLE 00001681 231363 2101657 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13,359.38 SNOW BLOWER 00001675 231442 1100109 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 17,300.56 332272 3/412010 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 425.00 HOSTING FEE 231284 142 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 425.00 332273 314/2010 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 1,965.27 MEMBERSHIP CARDS 231408 10222 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,965.27 332274 314/2010 125287 MCDONOUGH'S WATERJETTING AND 1,392.50 CLEAR SEWER LINE 231409 122067 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,392.50 332275 3/412010 106326 MEDRANO, CHRIS 700.00 GOLF INSTRUCTION 231255 022410 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 700.00 332276 31412010 101483 MENARDS 9.12 GORILLA TAPE 00006450 231364 12596 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 9.12 332277 31412010 101987 MENARDS 29.98 TOOLS, DRAIN CLEANER 00002029 231159 56160 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 31.18 CASTERS, SCREWS 00002010 231160 56429 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 265.29 ICE MELT, BULBS, LUBRICANT 00002014 231161 57416 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 28.77 CABINET PARTS 00002014 231162 57501 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 19.29 BATTERIES, STRAINER 231410 59414 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 374.51 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 19 3/1/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332278 314/2010 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 55.00 OFFICIATING FEES 231411 3721 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 55.00 332279 31412010 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 300.64 PAPER & CLEANING PRODUCTS 00003666 231412 29226 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.64 332280 31412010 125297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE 328.00 INSTRUCTION AC 231466 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 328.00 332281 31412010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,592.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001616 231190 33575 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,592.50 332282 31412010 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,058.00 CONNECTION FEE 231082 021710 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,058.00 332283 314/2010 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 300.00 WASTEWATER CONFERENCE 00001619 231436 FISCAL -6 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 300.00 332284 314/2010 100311 MINNESOTA RESTURANT ASSOCIATIO 240.00 2010 DUES 231256 99139 - 2010 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 240.00 332285 314/2010 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPAS 140.00 DUES - ANGELA MCINTIRE 231257 2010 -AM 5910.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL (BILLING) 140.00 332286 31412010 101779 MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIO 645.00 CONFERENCE FEE 231163 INV409542 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 645.00 332287 314/2010 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS 100.00 ELEVATOR PERMIT 231413 022510 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 332288 31412010 102487 MNISCIA 50.00 2010 MEMBERSHIP 231365 M10-84 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 20 3/1/2010 — 3/4/2010 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 332289 31412010 125290 MNJAC 225.00 CONFERENCE 231438 022410 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 332290 3/412010 122241 MONAHAN, KIMBERLY 216.00' INSTRUCTOR AC 231467 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 216.00 332291 31412010 101796 MPCA 23.00 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL FEE 231441 030110 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 332292 3/4/2010 102421 MPGMA 75.00 DUES - FRED RICHARDS GC 231258 2010 -21 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 75.00 DUES - BRAEMAR GC 231259 2010 -04 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 150.00 332293 31412010 120551 MPROA 300.00 MEMBERSHIPS (15) 231437 021910 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 300.00 332294 3/4/2010 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,830.00 MGA AD 00006445 231260 G256022 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,830.00 332295 31412010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 470.61 IRRIGATION HEADS 231083 712553 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 461.27- RETURNED HEADS 231084 712531 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 9.34 332296 3/4/2010 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 1,667.63 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 231414 53755 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,667.63 332297 3/412010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 147.00 231210 58646 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 147.00 332296 3/412010 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 75.64 SQUARES, ROUNDS 00001679 231285 167709 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATInN GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 139.41 HOSES 00001682 231366 167892 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Page- 21 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ASSESSING ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 215.05 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 332299 314/2010 115212 NORTH STAR CHAPTER 195.00 SEMINAR 231191 022410 1190.6104 195.00 332300 3/412010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 139.70 PAINT, ERASERS, PENS 00009145 231367 38472900 5120.5510 172.73 PENCIL SETS 00009145 231368 38476600 5120.5510 312.43 332301 314/2010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 148.20 TONER 231415 508678909001 5621.6406 432.84 OFFICE CHAIR 231416 508678984001 5621.6406 35.91 PLASTIC UTENSILS 231417 509060015001 5620.6406 616.95 332302 314/2010 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 174.20 ART WORK SOLD 231261 021110 5101.4413 174.20 332303 314/2010 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 718.34 REPAIRS TO HEATERS 00002015 231164 33321 5630.6180 722.08 PROPANE TANK REPAIRS 00006449 231369 33366 5210.6230 722.08 PROPANE TANK REPAIRS 00006449 231369 33366 5511.6180 2,162.50 332304 31412010 124697 PARKER, CHELSEA 576.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 231468 022610 5125.6103 576.00 332305 314/2010 102440 PASS, GRACE 451.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 231469 022610 5110.6103 576.00 POT MAINTENANCE 231469 022610 5112.6103 1,027.50 332306 3/4/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 31.00 231119 8251050 -IN 5862.5515 465.00 231211 8517734N 5842.5513 960.96 231212 8251778 -IN 5822.5513 1,889.26 231315 8251784 -IN 5862.5513 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Page- 21 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ASSESSING ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 231419 3,346.22 1400.6406 332307 3/412010 022610 123330 PEARSON, KARI 231419 324.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231419 324.00 1400.6104 332308 314/2010 022610 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 231419 322.74 1400.6103 231440 457.65 1400.6104 760.39 332309 3/412010 124709 PETRELLA, ADAM 70.00 CERTIFICATION TEST FEE 70.00 332310 31412010 103512 PETTY CASH 25.00 POLICE CHECKBOOK 25.76 POLICE CHECKBOOK 30.00 POLICE CHECKBOOK 52.35 POLICE CHECKBOOK 55.00 POLICE CHECKBOOK 168.00 POLICE CHECKBOOK 506.00 POLICE CHECKBOOK 862.11 332311 3/4/2010 103512 PETTY CASH 57.62- PETTY CASH 10.00 PETTY CASH 12.86 PETTY CASH 54.34 PETTY CASH 76.05 PETTY CASH 133.09 PETTY CASH 168.00 PETTY CASH 247.08 PETTY CASH 643.80 332312 31412010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 628.11 729.04 135.56 1,597.28 2,654.25 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 231470 022610 5110.6103 231262 51156173 5630.5510 231370 51156076 5210.5510 231418 022510 1470.6104 231419 022610 1400.6105 231419 . 022610 1400.6406 231419 022610 1419.6104 231419 022610 1400.6203 231419 022610 1400.6104 231419 022610 1400.6106 231419 022610 1400.6103 231440 030110 1400.8060 231440 030110 1400.6106 231440 030110 1450.6406 231440 030110 1400.6551 231440 030110 1400.6203 231440 030110 1400.6406 231440 030110 1400.6107 231440 030110 1400.6104 231120 2873788 5822.5513 231316 2876556 5862.5513 231317 2876550 5862.5513 231318 2876554 5862.5513 231319 2876555 5862.5512 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CASH OVER AND UNDER MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES AMMUNITION UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 3/3/2010 8:04 :26 Page - 22 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF DOME PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 23 3/1/2010 - 314/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,349.68 231503 2876545 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,056.05 231504 2876552 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 857.98 231505 2876547 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 124.12 231506 2876546 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5.33- 231507 3431258 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.04- 231508 3431257 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5919.6104 5862.5515 1553.6583 1553.6583 5919.6104 2310.6230 5631.6610 5620.6511 5620.6511 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TRAINING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11,115.70 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 332313 31412010 50TH ST SELLING 104717 PHILLIPS, RAYMOND 50TH ST SELLING 76.00 MILEAGE - TRAINING 231172 022310 76.00 332314 31412010 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 280.80 231121 10391 280.80 332315 31412010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 238.87 TIRES 00001563 231085 367554 763.17 TIRES 00001563 231086 363074 1,002.04 332316 31412010 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 76.00 MILEAGE - TRAINING 231171 0222310 76.00 332317 31412010 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH 78.00 CARDSET ESP MAINTENANCE 231376 54411 78.00 332318 31412010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 203.06 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00002016 231165 4731 295.86 ROLL TOWEL, LINERS, TISSUE 00002215 231420 4724 381.52 TISSUE, LINERS, MOPS 00002222 231421 4728 880.44 332319 3/412010 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,847.27 231213 273134 -00 196.22 231214 273125 -00 2,551.28 231215 273284 -00 1,535.20 231216 273316 -00 1,508.81 231217 273318 -00 196.22 231218 273128 -00 5919.6104 5862.5515 1553.6583 1553.6583 5919.6104 2310.6230 5631.6610 5620.6511 5620.6511 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TRAINING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 24 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 15.99- 231219 269731 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.33- 231220 269732 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5.33- 231221 272042 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,877.41 231320 273240 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,430.40 231321 273317 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,850.27 231322 273126 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 196.22 231323 273127 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15.99- 231324 272046 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,161.21 231509 273241 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 545.07 231510 273135 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 128.00 231511 273534 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 512.00 231512 273496 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 109.60- 231513 270551 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17,381.34 332320 3/412010 103930 QUIST, SUSAN 110.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 231371 022510 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 110.96 332321 3/4/2010 123898 QWEST 55.70 952 922 -2444 231534 2444 -2110 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 113.95 952 920 -8166 231535 8166 -2/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 169.65 332322 314/2010 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 2,217.67 RACING LANE LINES 00002208 231422 193807 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,217.67 332323 31412010 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 184.86 AD FOR BID 231166 4330467 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 184.86 AD FOR BID 231167 4331976 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 184.86 AD FOR BID 231168 4336842 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 554.58 332324 31412010 125269 RICHFIELD BLOOMINGTON CREDIT U 47.31 REFUND - 5808 DEWEY HILL RD 231087 OVERPAYMENT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 47.31 332325 31412010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 728.89 SOFTENER SALT 00008077 231088 00231558 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 728.89 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 25 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332326 31412010 102921 SAMPSON MILLER ADVERTISING INC 236.06 AWARD 00006446 231263 61606 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 236.06 332327 31412010 118168 SANSIO 755.61 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 231423 INV016105 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 755.61 332328 3/4/2010 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 480.80 INSTRUCTOR AC 231471 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 480.80 332329 31412010 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 667.08 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 00007156 231089 8102549528 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 667.08 332330 31412010 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH 450.46 PETTY CASH 231424 022510 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 450.46 332331 31412010 100995 SEH 664.74 WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN 231286 228152 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 664.74 332332 31412010 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 189.00 NAME PLATE 231090 41121 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 189.00 332333 31412010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231472 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 560.00 POT MAINTENANCE 231472 022610 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 800.00 332334 31412010 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 101.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231434 030110 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 101.40 332335 3/412010 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 792.00 CHAMPIONSHIP VESTS 231091 329698 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 792.00 332336 3/412010 125137 SJOBLOM, JOHN R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 873184124 -087 Council Check Register 58.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 7411.6188 3/112010 - 3/4/2010 58.50 1120.6188 332337 31412010 Subledger Account Description 105099 SOUTHSIDE PRIDE 231287 022510 1622.6107 140.00 NOKOMIS AD 231372 28339 5210.6122 126.00 RIVERSIDE AD 231373 28378 5210.6122 266.00 GOLF DOME PROGRAM 332338 3/412010 231092 110977 SOW, ADAMA 2210.6188 231092 612.08 INSTRUCTOR AC 231092 873184124 -087 904.00 MAINTENANCE 873184124 -087 1470.6188 1,516.08 873184124 -087 332339 31412010 873184124 -087 104672 SPRINT 231092 873184124 -087 1.85 231092 873184124 -087 1640.6168 12.95 873184124 -087 1495.6188 231092 35.52 5910.6188 231092 873184124 -087 51.13 231093 666109817 -027 5910.6188 51.13 51.66 51.77 51.87 52.91 103.97 105.73 132.83 154.67 187.05 231.84 258.10 348.77 388.13 500.98 1,140.34 1,631.88 39.99 DATA CARDS 5,585.07 231473 022610 5110.6103 231473 022610 5111.6103 231092 CITY OF EDINA 5631.6188 3/3/2010 8:04:26 873184124 -087 Council Check Register 231092 Page - 26 7411.6188 3/112010 - 3/4/2010 873184124 -087 1120.6188 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 231287 022510 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 231372 28339 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 231373 28378 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 231473 022610 5110.6103 231473 022610 5111.6103 231092 873184124 -087 5631.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1240.6188 231092 873184124 -087 7411.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1120.6188 231092 873184124 -087 5841.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1190.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1140.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1490.6188 231092 873184124 -087 4090.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1553.6188 231092 873164124 -067 2210.6188 231092 873184124 -087. 1322.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1554.6230 231092 873184124 -087 1470.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1260.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1301.6188 231092 873184124 -087 5621.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1640.6168 231092 873184124 -087 1495.6188 231092 873184124 -087 5910.6188 231092 873184124 -087 1400.6188 231093 666109817 -027 5910.6188 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE ASSESSING TELEPHONE PLANNING TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 332340 31412010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 44.32 CONDUIT 00001774 231192 S2166379.001 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 44.32 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 27 3/1/2010 - 314/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332341 31412010 101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 2,000.00 MEMBERSHIP 231425 030110 1506.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 2,000.00 332342 3/412010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 85.80 AD FOR BID 231094 1229337 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 486.20 PUBLISH ORD 231095 1230790 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 157.30 PUBLISH ORD 231096 1230788 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 114.40 PUBLISH ORD 231097 1230789 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 53.63 PUBLISH NOTICE 231098 1230791 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 28.60 PUBLISH NOTICE 231099 1232060 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 50.05 PUBLISH CDBG PLAN 231100 1232059 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 71.50 AD FOR BID 231101 1233042 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 35.75 PUBLISH NOTICE 231102 1234029 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1,083.23 332343 3/4/2010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 631.00 231514 MVP00067 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 631.00 332344 314/2010 101027 TARGET 80.12 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 231374 021810 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 80.12 332345 3/412010 116438 TC WELLNESS 135.00 EDINA ART CENTER AD 231474 020810 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 135.00 332346 3/4/2010 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 77.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231439 030110 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 77.50 332347 3/412010 101028 TERRY ANN SALES CO 760.85. CONTAINERS 00006447 231264 22310 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 760.85 332348 31412010 123993 THERMAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. 112.00 LEAK REPAIR 231426 201425 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 509.67 BOILER REPAIR 231427 201420 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 635.43 POOL DEHUMIDIFICATION 231428 201524 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 625.00 EXHAUST FAN REPAIRS 231429 201477 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 289.00 WIRING - BOILER 231430 201529 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 28 311/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,171.10 332349 31412010 125288 THERMO -DYNE INC. 2,074.00 BOILER REPAIRS 231431 40416 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,074.00 332350 3/412010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 63.00 231122 579745A 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 830.00 231515 580828 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 52.65 231516 580550 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,339.35 231517 580549 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,285.00 332351 3/4/2010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 200.00 DRAFT MEETING 1/19/10 231103 M17493 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 106.25 DRAFT MINUTES 2101/10 231104 M17522 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 306.25 332352 31412010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 135.57 WELDING SUPPLIES 00001638 231169 297412 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 135.57 332353 314/2010 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 295.85 MOTOR 00001677 231170 167385 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 295.85 332354 3/412010 102692 UNITED HEALTH CARE 701.32 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 231476 93813 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 701.32 RICHARD LOVE JR 231477 94157 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,402.64 332355 31412010 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 118.89 SHIP H2O SAMPLES 00001615 231193 TRAN:2256 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 118.89 332356 3/4/2010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 735.77 WATERPROOF BOOTS 00001772 231194 992512 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 328.72 BOOTS, LEATHERMAN 231288 994947 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,064.49 332357 31412010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 38.05 CAN LINERS 231265 151468 -00 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 231123 0023242 -IN 5862.5512 CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 1,032.50 231325 0023243 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register 422.75 231326 0023366 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 311/2010 - 314/2010 231518 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 988.64 LINERS, ROLL TOWEL, CUPS 00006347 231266 151388 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 379.31 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS 00007512 231267 151467 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,406.00 1,442.07 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE STUDY 332358 31412010 05473.1705 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE WM -473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 7,142.07 800.00 AR &LE CATALOG 231105 12010 1629.6575 PRINTING 332364 31412010 800.00 104681 WEBB, DONNA 332359 314/2010 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.00 SUPPLIES 231475 022610 5110.6564 93.81 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 231378 2356263762 1400.6188 TELEPHONE INSTRUCTOR AC 231475 93.81 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 332360 3/412010 119454 VINOCOPIA 3/3/2010 8:04:26 Page - 29 Business Unit GRILL YORK SELLING ADAPTIVE RECREATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 208.25 231123 0023242 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,032.50 231325 0023243 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 422.75 231326 0023366 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 197.50 231518 0023385 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 587.75 231518 0023385 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,446.75 332361 31412010 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 5,700.00 2010 RAMP CERTIFICATION 231289 21361300001 1260.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 332362 3/412010 101932 VOTH, BART 42.00 MILEAGE - TRAINING 231177 022310 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 42.00 332363 31412010 102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 5,700.00 2010 RAMP CERTIFICATION 231289 21361300001 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,442.07 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE STUDY 231290 21362200001 05473.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 7,142.07 332364 31412010 104681 WEBB, DONNA 32.00 SUPPLIES 231475 022610 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 144.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 231475 022610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 176.00 332365 31412010 102020 WELLS, GARY 42.00 MILEAGE - TRAINING 231175 022310 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 42.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332366 31412010 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 566.06 MARCH MAINTENANCE 231179 . 030110 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 566.06 332367 314/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 628.30 231223 237465 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 702.74 231224 237464 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,367.48 231327 237463 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,698.52 332368 3/412010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 864.84 231328 308235 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 678.65 231329 308233 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 608.67 231519 308232 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10.00- 231520 46552 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6.67- 231521 46774 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7.50- 231522 46811 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5.33- 231523 46812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,122.66 332369 3/412010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 70.44 231124 361517 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 197.15 231225 364414 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 60.24 231226 364417 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 9,509.27 231227 364416 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 92.73 231228 364413 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,298.40 231229 364411 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 43.10- 231230 796485 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,812.75 231330 360089 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9,353.36 231331 364408 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 65.10 231332 364409 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 4,628.51 231333 364410 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 197.15 231334 364407 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 77.95- 231335 795323 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 451.15- 231336 796264 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 894.20 231524 364412 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 28,607.10 332370 31412010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,618.70 231125 573655 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,982.75 231231 574439 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 60.00 231232 574440 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 313/2010 8:04:26 Page - 30 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA '313/2010 8:04:26 Council Check Register Page - 31 311/2010 — 314/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description Business Unit 64.50 231233 574441 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 114.40 231525 573873 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 968.50 231526 573872 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 978.25 231527 576181 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 1330.6185 5620.6185 5862.5513 1521.6103 07102.1705.24 07102.1705.24 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 547,223.35 Total Payments 547,223.35 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,787.10 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 332371 31412010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 735.50 231234 243789 1,411.30 231235 243787 1,351.40 231337 243785 148.02- 231528 243740 3,350.18 332372 3/4/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 38.07 51- 5276505 -8 231106 228431902 8,409.06 51- 6644819 -9 231536 229453686 8,447.13 332373 314/2010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 402.50 231338 9280 402.50 332374 314/2010 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 4,686.00 CITY GYM MAINTENANCE 00007158 231537 9035 4,686.00 332376 31412010 100668 URS CORPORATION 268.40 PROMENADE PHASE II 231538 4206245 5,268.06 PROMENADE PHASE II 231539 4206441 5,536.46 547,223.35 Grand Total 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 1330.6185 5620.6185 5862.5513 1521.6103 07102.1705.24 07102.1705.24 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 547,223.35 Total Payments 547,223.35 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT S102 PROMENADE IMP PHASE I CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT S102 PROMENADE IMP PHASE I R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 3/1/2010 - 3/4/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 178,546.58 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,777.41 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 10,538.13 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 94,463.69 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 13,359.38 05100 ART CENTER FUND 15,896.43 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,368.80 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 7,507.16 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 4,107.05 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 28,625.81 05800 LIQUOR FUND 127,748.40 05900 UTILITY FUND 52,410.92 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 9,873.59 Report Totals 547,223.35 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief. that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures data _ '3 3/3/2010 8:05:46 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 1 3/5/2010 -3111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332376 315/2010 231540 100613 AAA 1375.6103 1,116.84 29.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 231730 030410 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.00 160.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 231753 7211 1400.6215 332377 3/912010 100613 AAA 332384 3111/2010 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 23.50 LICENSE TABS 231944 030910 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80596 5621.6575 23.50 271.95 332378 311112010 110728 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 219.00 MEMBERSHIP - VICKI OLSON 170.00 PLUMBING CODE SEMINAR 231945 030910 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 170.00 332379 311112010 105696 3CMA 375.00 SAVVY CONTEST ENTRIES 231875 030810 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 375.00 332380 311112010 125153 A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP. 3,800.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 231731 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 3,800.00 332381 3111/2010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 55.00 231609 0723443 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 108.60 231794 0723471 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 26.20 231795 0805250 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 38.00 231796 072370 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 332382 311112010 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC 1,116.84 WINDOW CLEANING 00005434 231540 73342 1375.6103 1,116.84 332383 3/1112010 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 160.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 231753 7211 1400.6215 160.00 332384 3111/2010 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 271.95 PARK PRESS (EVENTS) 231876 80596 5621.6575 271.95 332385 3/1112010 119537 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOCIATION 219.00 MEMBERSHIP - VICKI OLSON 231946 152063 -2010 1160.6105 219.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION FINANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 2 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332386 311112010 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 44.51 231541 022810 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 61.36 231541 022810 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 94.44 231541 022810 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 137.81 231541 022810 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 192.18 231541 022810 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 229.26 231541 022810 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 325.89 231541 022810 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,085.45 332387 3111/2010 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 50.59 PAPER 231704 10234618 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 99.61 PAPER 231704 10234618 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 99.62 PAPER 231704 10234618 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 249.82 332388 311112010 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 96.19 MONITORING SERVICE 00001443 231705 141698 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 144.28 MONITORING SERVICE 00001444 231706 141697 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.47 332389 311112010 121985 ARROW HOCKEY AND SPORT CORP 162.34 LACES 00002020 231707 0023672 -IN 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 162.34 332390 311112010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 231793 030110 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 231793 030110 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 231793 030110 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 66.03 231793 030110 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 73.77 231793 030110 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 81.29 231793 030110 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.66 231793 030110 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 84.35 231793 030110 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 201.32 231793 030110 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 232.79 231793 030110 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 264.90 231793 030110 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 264.91 231793 030110 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 265.88 231793 030110 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 612.03 231793 030110 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,341.92 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/5/2010 — 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332391 3/1112010 125309 ATKINSON, CLIFF 16.24 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 231749 5113 INDIANOLA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 16.24 332392 311112010 100642 BANNERS TO GO 106.71 PARK SIGNAGE 00001107 231877 29509 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 106.71 332393 3/1112010 125307 BARNABAS HOUSE, THE 15.00 REFUND (SUPER SUNDAY) 231752 030410 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 332394 311112010 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 100.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231542 030110 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 100.50 332395 3/1112010 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 53.44 HOCKEY NET REPAIR PARTS 00001435 231878 00078098 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 53.44 332396 311112010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 864.20 231610 52333300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 214.85 231611 52333200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 43.47- 231612 83328700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,035.58 332397 311112010 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 131.78 EASTER EGG SCRAMBLE SUPPLIES 231879 030810 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 131.78 332398 3111/2010 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 44,906.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 231732 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 44,906.50 332399 311112010 124957 BERNARD L. DALSIN COMPANY 175,940.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 231733 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 175,940.00 332400 311112010 101376 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 117.83 DOOR PARTS 00001808 231880 S68051 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 117.83 R55CKREG LOG20000 520.84 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 311112010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1470.6510 332401 3111/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 1,252.60 6.80 BINDERS 00001860 231754 57910.1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001860 231755 57910 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001860 231755 57910 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES 231947 56365 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 231948 56434 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 231949 56978 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 231950 56993 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 232013 55783 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 267.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 232014 55918 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 232015 55918.1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 232016 56053 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 232017 56053.1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3110/2010 7:45:04 Page - 4 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 520.84 332402 311112010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,252.60 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003673 231881 87129230 1470.6510 1,252.60 332403 3/1112010 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 626.50 231797 98212 5862.5513 626.50 332404 3/1112010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 70.20 HUB CAPS, SEALS 00001727 231543 380267 1553.6530 70.20 332405 3111/2010 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 3,402.50 LEGAL 231882 2851G -2/10 1195.6131 3,402.50 332406 3111/2010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5,046.60 231613 19320 5842.5514 29.30 231614 19321 5842.5515 373.45 231615 134000 5822.5514 5,449.35 332407 3/1112010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 1,920.00 231616 85249 5842.5513 1,920.00 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3110/2010 7:45:04 Page - 4 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 5 3/5/2010 - 3111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332408 3111/2010 125320 CEF OF MINNESOTA 250.00 MECHANICAL CODE SEMINAR 231951 030910 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 250.00 332409 311112010 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 422.90 231617 412678 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 422.90 332410 311112010 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 8,842.89 LAB SERVICES 231756 022810 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 8,842.89 332411 311112010 105529 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 450.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 231757 030210 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 450.00 332412 3/11/2010 105529 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 225.00 COURSE REGISTRATION 232011 030910 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 332413 311112010 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 43.28 HORN BUTTON 00001634 231544 131763 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.28 332414 311112010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 510.80 231798 0108021320 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 510.80 332415 3/1112010 125308 COLDWELL BANKER 22.97 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 231750 6828 CHAPEL LA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 22.97 332416 311112010 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 231775 0165667- 2110 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 231776 199138 -2/10 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 231883 0177449 - 2/10 5420,6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 222.21 332417 311112010 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 59.33 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00001787 231545 03617760 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 146.98 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00001787 231545 03617760 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.94 SAFETY GLASSES 00001813 231708 03620630 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 311112010 CITY OF EDINA 12,257.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 231734 031210 4402.1705.30 Council Check Register 332424 311112010 106066 DENNIS ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATION 3/5/2010 — 3/11/2010 FINAL PAYMENT 231735 031210 4402.1705.30 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 286.25 SHIRTS WITH LOGOS 231760 5297 4607.6203 54.00 332418 311112010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 1,863.75 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008096 231546 69902 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 697.87 CHILLER REPAIR 00008095 231547 70020 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 702.00 ICE PLANT REPAIR 00008094 231548 70062 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12,599.25 REPLACE TUBE HEATERS 00008035 231709 70031 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 15,862.87 332419 3/11/2010 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 55.08 DOOR HANDLES 00001862 231549 149103 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.08 332420 311112010 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 630.47 HOSE, FITTINGS, SLEEVES 00001673 231758 53018 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 630.47 332421 311112010 104020 DALCO 1,870.31 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008078 231550 2186098 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 320.63 WYPALL, CAN LINERS 00001750 231551 2183887 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 728.35 SNOW PLOW COATING 00001766 231759 2187492 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,919.29 332422 3/1112010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page- 6 Business Unit ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS WATER TREATMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,228.00 231618 541163 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,198.55 231619 542111 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,713.35 231620 542112 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 332423 311112010 124852 DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 12,257.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 231734 031210 4402.1705.30 12,257.85 332424 311112010 106066 DENNIS ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATION 10,449.60 FINAL PAYMENT 231735 031210 4402.1705.30 10,449.60 332425 311112010 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 54.00 SHIRTS WITH LOGOS 231760 5297 4607.6203 54.00 332426 3/1112010 103594 EDINALARM INC. CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 315/2010 — 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 225.00 ALARM REPAIRS 00001454 231884 59070 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 225.00 332427 3/11/2010 124772 EXCALIBUR CAULKING INC. 13,364.60 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 231736 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 13,364.60 332428 3/1112010 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 4,944.00 FEB TRANSPORTS 231669 030210 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,944.00 332429 311112010 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 7.98 HARDWARE 00001112 231885 MNSTU30947 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.98 332430 311112016 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 9.78 PRINTING 00006458 231777 06220039730 5410.6575 PRINTING 9.78 332431 311112010 122077 FIELDS, DEBRA 100.00 SMPSTF CHANGE FUND 231886 030410 7400.1040 CHANGE FUND 100.00 332432 311112010 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 775.71 WHEELS FOR SEWER CAMERA 00001768 231710 13119 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 775,71 332433 3/1112010 102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA 91.18 BUD VASES - STATE OF THE COMM 231887 5649 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 91.18 332434 3111/2010 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 488.04 K9 EXAM 231761 358666 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 259.25 K9 EXAM 231688 359390 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 747.29 332435 311112010 102727 FORCE AMERICA 848.03 POWER TAKE OFF 00001686 231552 01337357 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 848.03 332436 3111/2010 117674 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 821.40 2010 CITATIONS 231762 201041 1400.6575 PRINTING 3/1012010 7:45:04 Page- 7 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION PSTF BALANCE SHEET SEWER CLEANING COMMUNICATIONS EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/5/2010 - 3111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 821.40 332437 3/1112010 125304 FRASER LOUISE HOUSE 60.00 REFUND (SUPER SUNDAY) 231763 030110 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 60.00 332438 3/11/2010 100764 G & K SERVICES 65.97 SHOP TOWELS 231778 1006237982 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 65.97 SHOP TOWELS 231779 1006260658 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 131.94 332439 311112010 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL CO. INC. 650,153.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 231737 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 650,153.40 332440 3111/2010 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 28.99 R -91 PHONE 231889 2021778 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 28.99 332441 3/11/2010 101679 GOLFCRAFTINC. 460.00 GOLF CLUBS 00006398 231780 21894 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 460.00 332442 3/1112010 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 256.65 FEB SERVICE 00001622 231553 0020469 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 256.65 332443 3111/2010 101103 GRAINGER 11.51 TOOLBOX 00001795 231554 9189104301 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.75 HOSE 00002225 231891 9187297289 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.26 332444 311112010 125323 GRANNES, AMY 126.86 RETIREMENT PARTY EXPENSES 232012 030810 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 126.86 332445 311112010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 3/1012010 7:45:04 Page - 8 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RANGE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH PARK POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,015.75 231799 116819 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 690.25 231800 116962 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 326.75 231988 116952 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.032.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 9 3/5/2010 — 3111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332446 3/1112010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 9.52 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 231890 030510 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 12.93 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 231890 030510 5821.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 17.29 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 231890 030510 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 39.74 332447 311112010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 41.02 ADAPTERS, CABLE TIES 00001803 231892 946271018 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 41.02 332448 311112010 124854 GRESSER COMPANIES INC. 53,228.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 231738 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 53,228.50 332449 3/1112010 124864 GRESSER COMPANIES INC. 85,500.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 232020 MAR12 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 85,500.00 332450 3/11/2010 105539 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO. 31,616.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 231739 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 31,616.00 332451 3/1112010 100786 GROTH MUSIC 220.50 SHEET MUSIC 231893 1647613 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 220.50 332452 311112010 102967 HALSTEAD, TODD 102.80 UNIFORM PURCHASE 231894 030510 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.80 332453 311112010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,737.05 CHEMICALS 00005451 231764 3097211 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,737.05 332454 311112010 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. 60.00 SEMINAR (2) 00001441 231952 ACK#711669 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 60.00 332455 3111/2010 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 231895 022442 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 205.44 R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 3/5/2010 — 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 332456 311112010 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,193.75 JAN 2010 ROOM & BOARD 231765 20101 - EDINA 1195.6225 2,193.75 332467 311112010 101717 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 210.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE LICENSE 00001818 231670 25193 1280.6271 315.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE LICENSE 231781 24892 5422.6182 525.00 332458 3/1112010 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08 JAN 2010 SERVICE 231896 QB12647 1470.6103 2,475.08 FEB 2010 SERVICE 231897 QB12648 1470.6103 4,950.16 332459 3/1112010 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 1,434.16 EMT TRAINING 231953 00192676 1470.6104 1,434.16 332460 3111/2010 116660 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 585.68 TEST BOX 00004378 231711 47180534 1554.6710 4,796.55 PCS FOR BRAEMAR GOLF 00004377 231712 47175066 1554.6710 5,382.23 332461 311112010 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 12.60 231801 514250 5822.5515 185.12 231801 514250 5822.5514 614.50 231802 514249 5842.5514 575.90 231989 514248 5862.5514 1,388.12 332462 3111/2010 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 172.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231954 030410 1644.6107 172.00 332463 311112010 103869 HOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MINNESOTA 109.50 PRESSURE WASHER REPAIR 231782 34921 5422.6180 109.50 332464 311112010 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 346.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231713 030210 1240.6107 346.70 Subledger Account Description BOARD & ROOM PRISONER HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL RUBBISH REMOVAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3110/2010 7:45:04 Page - 10 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 332465 3/1112010 125312 HUGHES, TIM 82.50 SKATING CLASS REFUND 231746 030310 5511.6136 82.50 332466 311112010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 46.77 BALL CHECK VALVE 00001791 231555 596171 5921.6406 179.42 VALVES FOR CHEM FEEDS 00001809 231766 596628 5912.6406 226.19 332467 3/11/2010 105052 INNOVATIVE GRAPHICS 636.00 SAFETY CAMP SHIRTS 231898 30582 1624.6406 636.00 332468 3/11/2010 125305 INTERCLEAN EQUIPMENT INC. 156,460.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 232019 031210 4402.1705.30 158,460.00 332469 311112010 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 353.95 CODE BOOKS 231955 1182928 -IN 1495.6405 353.95 332470 3111/2010 124628 J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION 66,648.00 PUBLIC WORKS BLDGIMETRO BLVD 231745 8115 -7 4402.1705.24 66,648.00 332471 311112010 118275 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 239.50 DATE STAMPS 231556 55418 5910.6406 239.50 332472 3111/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,080.00 231621 1357780 5842.5514 39.05 231622 1048030 5822.5515 712.30 231623 1369014 5822.5514 2,155.55 231624 1369010 5822.5514 123.00 231625 975842 5822.5514 3,459.00 231626 1357792 5842.5514 4,210.70 231990 1369009 5862.5514 249.40 231991 1347598 5862.5512 17.55 231992 1369021 5842.5515 8,112.97 231993 1369020 5842.5514 39.85- 231994 1048031 5862.5514 22,119.67 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page- 11 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT WELL HOUSES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING BOOKS & PAMPHLETS INSPECTIONS CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3110/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 12 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Buslness Unit 332474 3/1112010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5,385.38 231627 1788977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,016.42 231628 1788975 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,362.40 231629 1788974 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 231630 1788973 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,849.86 231631 1788982 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 231632 1788972 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 112.20 231633 1788969 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 846.70 231634 1788980 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 112.12 231635 1788981 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5.04- 231636 450138 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 217.24 231803 1792996 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 214.74 231804 1793002 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.12 231805 1792994 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .28 231806 1792993 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,634.39 231807 1793007 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,507.64 231808 1793005 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 144.00 231809 1789483 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,703.00 231810 1789942 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,660.54 231811 1793004 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 586.00 231812 1793003 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 231813 1792995 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,004.34 231814 1793006 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 341.61 231615 1792988 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 506.00 231816 1792989 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,276.16 231817 1792990 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 121.12 231818 1792987 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 82.38 231819 1792991 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 495.82 231820 1792992 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 22.11- 231821 450444 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.79- 231822 450638 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.93- 231823 450639 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,873.80 231995 1793000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,436.06 231996 1792997 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,404.61 231997 1792998 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,163.03 231998 1792999 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,088.97 231999 1793001 •5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 44,103.42 332475 311112010 118069 JOYCE, CYNTHIA 53.30 ARTWORK SOLD 231975 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVS' R55CKREG LOG20000 159.67 CITY OF EDINA 231783 2514146 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Council Check Register 159.67 3/5/2010 — 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 53.30 332476 3111/2010 126301 KENNY BOILER & MFG. CO. 70.00 HAZMAT OPS CERTIFICATION FEE 4,985.00 BOILER REPAIR 00008092 231557 76335 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,973.60 BOILER REPAIR 00008091 231558 76331 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8,958.60 332477 311112010 311112010 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 118958 L.E.A. DATA TECHNOLOGIES 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 13 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 159.67 GOLF CLUB 231783 2514146 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 159.67 332478 311112010 124707 KNAEBLE, PETER 70.00 HAZMAT OPS CERTIFICATION FEE 231956 030310 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 332479 311112010 118958 L.E.A. DATA TECHNOLOGIES 30.00 UPGRADE FOR TRAINING SOFTWARE 231957 030410 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.00 332480 311112010 125311 LANDELLE, AMY 155.00 SKATING CLASS REFUND 231747 030310 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 155.00 332481 311112010 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 329.54 ELECTRICAL HARNESS 00002009 231714 208078 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 40.42 FILTERS 00002000 231899 207283 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 369.96 332482 311112010 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 58.37 CABLE TIES 00001764 231900 8931456 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 58.37 332483 311112010 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 WORKSHOP 231958 139426 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 20.00 332484 3/11/2010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,728.10 232000 80930 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,728.10 332485 311112010 101165 M.A.A.O. 75.00 MEMBERSHIP - MOREAU SANKEY 231559 030210 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 14 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No �- Subledger Account Description Business Unit 75.00 332486 3/1112010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 60.00 SWEEPER TRAINING 231767 2010 ELGIN 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 60.00 332487 311112010 105677 MAGC 45.00 NORTHERN LIGHTS ENTRY FEES 231901 030810 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 270.00 NORTHERN LIGHTS ENTRY FEES 231901 030810 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 315.00 332488 311112010 101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT 266.45 RESIDENTIAL COST HANDBOOK 231715 1051890 -RES 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 266.45 332489 3/1112010 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 67.50 REMOTE PROGRAMMING 231902 53876 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 67.50 332490 3/1112010 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 232.07 231903 607511491 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 232.07 332491 3111/2010 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 300.00 ANNUAL SERVICE 231671 10290 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 300.00 332492 3/11/2010 125310 MCCOY, VENY 71.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 231748 030310 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 71.00 332493 3111/2010 124708 MCLEOD, DOUG 70.00 HAZMAT CERTIFICATION FEE 231904 030310 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 332494 3111/2010 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 511.37 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003671 231905 97670 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 511.37 332495 311112010 105464 MEIXNER, DIANNE 52.00 ART WORK SOLD 231976 022510 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 52.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/5/2010 — 3111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332496 311112010 101987 MENARDS 44.06 HARDWARE 00001114 231906 57633 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 273.70 HARDWARE 00001115 231907 57870 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS SAC CHARGES SEWER SERVICE METRO GASOLINE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 15 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS SEWER TREATMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 317.76 332497 311112010 102281 MENARDS 95.64 SCREWDRIVERS, RIVETS 00001807 231560 97161 1301.6556 14.32 HARDWARE 00001437 231716 97694 1646.6406 92.15 CARPET 00006392 231784 95474 5210.6406 63.06 SANDER 00001439 231908 98910 1646.6556 64.38 SANDPAPER, 5 -HOLE H &L GRIT 00001430 231909 96501 1646.6556 329.55 332498 3111/2010 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 45,587.16 SAC FOR FEB 2010 231959 030110 1495.4307 45,587.16 332499 3/11/2010 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 355,505.96 SEWER SERVICE 231717 0000922703 5922.6302 355,505.96 332500 3/1112010 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 1,147.50 GASOLINE 231960 50304 5422.6581 1,147.50 332501 311112010 102582 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 20.00 LICENSE RENEWAL - DOUG ZYLKA 231961 074841 -RT 5410.6105 20.00 332502 311112010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 18.02 CO25 00006428 231910 R102100114 5421.6406 18.02 332503 311112010 102568 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI 75.00 2010 DUES 231963 030810 1470.6105 75.00 332504 3/1112010 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 1,530.00 POLICE OFFICER LICENSES (17) 231962 030510 1400.6104 1,530.00 TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS SAC CHARGES SEWER SERVICE METRO GASOLINE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 15 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS SEWER TREATMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 16 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332505 311112010 117420 MOE, MARK 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 231977 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 332506 311112010 106190 MOORE, MARY CARROLL 19.44 ART WORK SOLD 231987 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.44 332507 311112010 125322 MOSS, STEPHANIE 57.85 ART WORK SOLD 231978 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.85 332508 311112010 105921 MSTMA 40.00 WORKSHOP 231964 030110 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 40.00 332509 3111/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 190.01 SHOCK, LATCH, HANDLE 00006174 231785 711486 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 190.01 332510 3/1112010 124121 MULLANEY, MARLA 31.20 ART WORK SOLD 231979 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.20 332511 3111/2010 103007 NELSON, DAVID 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 231980 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 332512 311112010 121125 NEMER, KAREN 36.24 ART WORK SOLD 231981 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 36.24 332513 311112010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 328.50 231824 58733 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 328.50 332514 3111/2010 123853 NORDSTRAND, DOROTHY 76.70 ART WORK SOLD 231982 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 76.70 332515 311112010 102260 NORMAN, MIKE 44.20 ART WORK SOLD 231983 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 17 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 44.20 332516 311112010 125265 NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES 18.71 SAMPLE BOTTLES 00001765 231561 265994 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 18.71 332517 3/1112010 100292 NORTHERN ESCROW INC. 67,000.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 231740 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 67, 000.00 332518 3111/2010 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 227.67 SAFETY EYEWEAR, EARPLUGS 00003674 231911 P263226301016 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 227.67 332519 311112010 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 202.36 POLISH, DEGREASER 00001811 231562 5029600 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 202.36 332520 3/1112010 116114 OCE 134.08 FEB MAINTENANCE 231965 987062528 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 134.08 332521 3/1112010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 82.85 PAPER, STAPLER, HIGHLIGHTERS 00008079 231563 509461368001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 7.57 THERMAL PAPER 00006034 231786 118946833U 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 29.52 PAPER 231912 1182274980 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 40.10 PRINTING 231913 1182274984 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 160.04 332522 3111/2010 124855 PATRIOT ERECTORS INC. 23,119.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 231741 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 23,119.20 332523 311112010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,111.92 231825 8252542 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 775.04 231826 8251777 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 377.50 231827 8252548 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 760.40 231828 8252546 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8.00- 231829 8252120 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 128.25- 231830 8252123 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,888.61 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 18 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Iriv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 332524 3/1112010 102406 PETSMART #458 215.53 K9 SUPPLIES 00003048 231914 T -2956 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 215.53 332525 3/1112010 125313 PFORR, CURTIS 1,325.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 231768 030410 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,325.00 332527 3/11/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,648.74 231637 2876551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 147.36 231638 2876548 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,535.10 231639 2876553 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 66.66 231640 2876853 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 81.85 231641 2876852 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 861.20 231642 2876549 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 68.85 231643 2848589 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.66- 231644 3431267 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6.66- 231645 3431269 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12.00- 231646 3431268 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3.60- 231647 3431256 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 69.97- 231648 3431255 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 708.49 231831 2879588 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 456.96 231832 2877187 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 245.60 231833 2879584 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,390.35 231834 2879589 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12 231835 2879591 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,716.39 231836 2879590 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 231.51 231837 2879578 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,189.22 231838 2879579 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 57.12 231839 2879580 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 381.16 231840 2879581 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 213.11 231841 2879577 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 533.19 232001 2879585 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 615.16 232002 2879583 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 601.74 232003 2879586 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 522.00 232004 2879587 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,229.99 332528 311112010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 70.43 TIRES 00001683 231718 383992 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 165.00 TIRES 00001724 231915 381191 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 748.00 TIRES 00001815 231916 384631 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERO" "GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 19 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 222.33 TIRES 00001815 231917 386450 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,205.76 332529 311112010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 PERMIT #939 UTILITY BILLING 231751 030310 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,600.00 332530 311112010 100380 PRESTRUD, ROBERT 20.18 2010 UNIFORM PURCHASE 231564 030210 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.18 332531 311112010 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 40.00 ICE SHAVER SHARPENING 00001433 231719 246157 1648.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 40.00 332532 311112010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 602.24 ICE MELT 00002021 231918 4650 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 602.24 332533 311112010 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,089.40 231649 275269 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 331.50 231650 276207 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 497.20 231651 276206 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,672.57 231652 276204 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,528.24 231653 276212 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 578.40 231842 276203 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 625.20 231843 275267 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 95.00 231844 275268 -00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 810.60 231845 276456 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 457.60 231846 276205 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 984.00 231847 274955 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11,669.71 332534 311112010 123898 QWEST 55.66 952 929 -0297 231720 0297 -2110 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 529.04 952 927 -8861 231721 8861 -2/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.37 952 922 -9246 231769 9246 -2/10 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.23• 231966 022810 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 44.23- 231966 022810 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 41.52- 231966 022810 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 55.86 231966 022810 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.57 231966 022810 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3111/2010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 99.09 231966 022810 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 107.39 231966 022810 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 117.22 231966 022810 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 168.10 231966 022810 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 234.77 231966 022810 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 257.21 231966 022810 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 266.44 231966 022810 5932.6188 TELEPHONE 2 053.19 231966 022810 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 4090.6406 5422.6530 1600.4390.52 1600.4390.52 1120.6'120 5511.6136 5511.6136 551.1.6136 5420.6180 5101.4413 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SKATING & HOCKEY BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART WORK SOLD CLUB HOUSE ART CENTER REVENUES 3,912.93 332535 3111/2010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,511.56 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001865 231722 706 2,511.56 332536 3111/2010 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 179.64 TIRES 00006178 231787 CD1300468 179.64 332537 3/11/2010 126321 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS 700.00 PROGRAM SERVICES 231967 8004B 294.00 PROGRAM SERVICES 231968 8002 994.00 332538 3111/2010 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 676.50 AD FOR BID 231919 4339146 676.50 332539 3111/2010 122170 REGION 3AA 4,055.75 SECTION SEMI FINAL SPLIT 231702 030110 1,345.53 SECTION QUARTER FINAL SPLIT 231703 3-1 -10 5,401.28 332540 3/11/2010 101261 REGION 6AA 4,950.32 SECTION SEMI FINAL SPLIT 231701 030110 4,950.32 332541 3/11/2010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 116.75 SOFTENER REPAIR 00006456 231565 00231245 116.75 332542 3/1112010 103792 ROETTGER, MARY 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 231984 030110 4090.6406 5422.6530 1600.4390.52 1600.4390.52 1120.6'120 5511.6136 5511.6136 551.1.6136 5420.6180 5101.4413 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SKATING & HOCKEY BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART WORK SOLD CLUB HOUSE ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 21 3/5/2010 — 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 26.00 332543 311112010 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 450.02 WATER PIPE REPAIR 00008093 231566 04815429840 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 450.02 332544 3/1112010 125303 ROZMIAREK, EDWARD 530.72 SEWER OVERPAYMENT REFUND 231700 030110 5901.4641 SEWER CHARGES UTILITY REVENUES 530.72 332545 3/1112010 122470 RTL CONSTRUCTION INC. 9,500.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 231742 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 9,500.00 332546 3/11/2010 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 440.00 OAK WILT INSPECTIONS 00001449 231921 36884 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 440.00 332547 311112010 101232 SALUD AMERICA INC. 324.00 231654 EMLYAS022610D 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324.00 332548 3/1112010 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 187.93 LUMBER 00002013 231723 40822010 5630.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES 187.93 332549 3111/2010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 74.10 ART WORK SOLD 231985 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 74.10 332550 3/1112010 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 115.00 TIME CLOCK SERVICE 00008086 231567 78225 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 115.00 332551 311112010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 850.00 EMT REFRESHER 231770 8329 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 850.00 332552 311112010 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 17.15 PROPANE 00001861 231568 022310 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 64.35 PROPANE 00001861 231568 022310 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 81.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 FIRE SPRINKLER CONSULTING 231969 CITY OF EDINA 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 280.00 Council Check Register 332559 311112010 3/5/2010 - 3111/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332553 3/1112010 PW BUILDING 101004 SPS COMPANIES 123.19 PVC CAPS 00001801 231569 S2168926.001 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.19 82.23 AD FOR BID 231922 1235237 332554 311112010 ADMINISTRATION 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC AD FOR BID 231923 1235238 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 31.93 FITTINGS, HOSE 00006186 231788 SI77168 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 31.93 25.03 PUBLISH NOTICE 231925 1236589 332555 3/1112010 ADMINISTRATION 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC PUBLISH ORDINANCE 231926 1236586 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 22.84 LOCK KEYS 00001105 231724 CH- 528891 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 22.84 75.08 AD FOR BID 231928 1236588 332656 3/1112010 ADMINISTRATION 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 2,760.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 231771 8118 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2,760.00 HEAVY DUTY CASE 00001451 231929 26730 1640.6188 332657 3/1112010 31.15 101016 STREICHERS 64.10 DRUG TEST KITS 231772 1717297 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.10 332568 311112010 121681 SUMMIT CONSULTING 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 22 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 280.00 FIRE SPRINKLER CONSULTING 231969 1275420 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 280.00 332559 311112010 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 22,611.33 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 232018 031210 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 22,611.33 332560 311112010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 82.23 AD FOR BID 231922 1235237 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 78.65 AD FOR BID 231923 1235238 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 78.65 AD FOR BID 231924 1235239 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 25.03 PUBLISH NOTICE 231925 1236589 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 239.53 PUBLISH ORDINANCE 231926 1236586 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 57.20 AD FOR BID 231927 1236587 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 75.08 AD FOR BID 231928 1236588 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 636.37 332561 3111/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 31.15 HEAVY DUTY CASE 00001451 231929 26730 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 31.15 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/5/2010 — 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332562 311112010 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 154.70 ART WORK SOLD 231986 030210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLANTINGS 8 TREES GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 154.70 332563 311112010 104932 TAYLOR MADE 42.86 MERCHANDISE 231789 13514045 5440.5511 42.86 332564 3/1112010 102987 TEEMASTER CORPORATION 8,000.00 ANNUAL RESERVATION SYSTEM 231970 030410 5410.6230 8,000.00 332565 3111/2010 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 498.59 BULBS, LAMPS, CONNECTORS 00001639 231570 38227 -00 1553.6530 41.19- CREDIT 00005897 231773 9997311 1553.6530 457.40 332566 311112010 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 85.07 NURSERY SUPPLIES 00001431 231725 S122294 -IN 1643.6541 144.28 FLAGSTICKS 00006434 231791 S122114 -IN 5422.6406 229.35 332567 311112010 124958 THURNBECK STEEL FABRICATION IN 1,672.95 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 231743 031210 4402.1705.30 1,672.95 332568 311112010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 325.00 DRAFT MIINUTES 2116/10 231930 M17548 1120.6103 325.00 332569 311112010 101474 TITLEIST 648.00 MERCHANDISE 231792 1273833 5440.5511 648.00 332570 311112010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 36.84 WELDING TANKS 231931 498055 5630.6406 36.84 332671 3111/2010 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 1,803.46 16" LEDS 00001806 231571 41582 1330.6215 280.01 PROGRAMMING /INSTALLING MMUGED001548 231726 41579 1330.6180 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLANTINGS 8 TREES GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5422.6530 1400.6175 REPAIR PARTS 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 24 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 3301.6103 2,083.47 PIR DS REVENUES 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 332572 3111/2010 5910.6103 118190 TURFWERKS LLC GENERAL (BILLING) 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 75.48 TINES 00006182 231790 T120618 3101.6103 75.48 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 332573 311112010 5910.6103 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT GENERAL (BILLING) 5910.6103 299.20 FITNESS FOR DUTY 231932 101640414 PIR DS REVENUES 299.20 332574 311112010 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 165.00 DOOR REPAIRS 00001863 231572 328594 165.00 332575 3111/2010 103048 U.S. BANK 402.50 PAYING AGENT FEE 231672 2578770 402.50 PAYING AGENT FEE 231673 2578708 431.25 PAYING AGENT FEE 231674 2577639 402.50 PAYING AGENT 2005D 231675 2578709 1,000.00 TRUSTEE FEE 231676 2576433 431.25 PAYING AGENT FEE 231677 2580307 375.00 PAYING AGENT FEE 231678 2580308 431.25 PAYING AGENT FEE 231679 2580309 425.00 PAYING AGENT FEE 231680 2580936 425.00 PAYING AGENT FEE 231681 2580935 4,726.25 332576 311112010 125032 UNISELECT USA 1,289.82 AUTO PARTS 231573 022810 1,289.82 332577 311112010 102328 UNIMED MIDWEST INC. 387.97 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003672 231933 0072021 387.97 332578 3/1112010 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 175.17 HUBS FOR GEN. HOOK UP 00001773 231727 931812 175.17 332579 311112010 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 180.00 SHADE TREE COURSE 231971 030110 180.00 5422.6530 1400.6175 REPAIR PARTS 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 24 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1644.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 231848 CITY OF EDINA 5862.5513 401.25 Council Check Register 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 59.31 LAMPS 3/5/2010 — 3/11/2010 5913.6406 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332580 3/1112010 332589 3/1112010 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 75,338.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 231744 21.49 FOOD 231934 33069595 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 21.49 332581 311112010 100050 USPS44ASLER 1,000.00 TMS#202739 231972 030410 1400.6235 POSTAGE 1,000.00 332582 3111/2010 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 62.33 OXYGEN 00003649 231935 825220 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 62.33 332583 311112010 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 6,202.65 WATER MAIN REPAIRS 00001897 231936 15257 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6,202.65 332584 3111/2010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 42.11 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 231937 152588 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 317.28 CAN LINERS 00001116 231938 151640 -01 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 770.54 CAN LINERS 00001116 231939 151640 -00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,129.93 332585 3/11/2010 125302 VAZQUEZ, ARTURO 9.10 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 231699 030210 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 9.10 332586 311112010 125314 VELOCITY LLC 1,004.13 WEAPON PARTS 231774 95 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,004.13 332587 311112010 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 401.25 231848 13343 5862.5513 401.25 332588 3111/2010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 59.31 LAMPS 00001798 231728 15149699 -00 5913.6406 172.50 LAMPS 00001798 231728 15149699.00 1551.6406 231.81 332589 3/1112010 124959 W. L. HALL COMPANY 75,338.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 231744 031210 4402.1705.30 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page- 25 Business Unit GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DRUG FORFEITURE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS DISTRIBUTION CITY HALL GENERAL PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 31512010 - 3/11/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 26 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 75,338.80 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 332590 311112010 50TH ST SELLING 101071 WALLIN, JOHN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 73.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 231940 030510 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 73.50 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 332591 3/1112010 VERNON SELLING 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 275.00 LEAK LOCATE 00001621 231574 1776 YORK SELLING 5842.5513 275.00 YORK SELLING 332592 3/11/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 896.50 231849 237921 -00 15.00 231850 237785 -00 573.90 231850 237785 -00 396.25 232005 237784 -00 1,881.65 332593 311112010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,181.92 231655 308234 15.88- 231656 46772 12.41- 231657 46771 .56 231851 309088 5,179.07 231852 309090 477.42 231853 309086 8.00- 231854 46867 1,802.49 232006 309089 85.87 232007 309087 8,691.04 332594 3/11/2010 117482 WINECONNECTINC. 159.24 WEB -MARCH 2010 231729 466 159.24 332595 3/11/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 8,319.50 231658 364415 721.32 231659 367720 585.44 231660 367721 1,713.70 231661 366570 6,105.62 231662 367718 4,348.55 231663 366569 73.05- 231664 796916 4,348.55 231855 366573 Business Unit 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Page - 26 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3110/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 27 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 123.82 231856 367724 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 13,484.02 231857 367723 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 151.15 231858 366069 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,569.40 231859 366574 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,176.70 231860 367722 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 91.20 231861 368125 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 804.20 231862 366068 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 105.09 231863 367719 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,830.05 231864 367716 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.10 231865 367717 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 152.88 231866 367365 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,348.55 232008 366571 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 54,971.79 332596 311112010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 919.60 231665 576000 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 40.00 231666 576001 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,046.05 231667 576996 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,413.10 232009 578585 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 232010 520813 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 6,448.75 332697 3/11/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,343.30 231668 244140 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,013.35 231867 244138 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 53.34- 231868 243761 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,093.41 231869. 244141 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3.396.72 332599 3111/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 137.34 51- 6229265 -9 231577 229797524 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 947.22 51- 6229265 -9 231577 229797524 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,094.77 51- 5107681 -4 231578 229422057 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 326.95 51- 6046826 -0 231579 229792366 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,030.17 51- 5547446 -1 231580 229606428 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 32,449.80 51- 4621797 -2 231581 229689139 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,104.74 51- 6223269 -1 .231582 229446796 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 66.00 51- 6692497 -0 231583 229288873 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 87.74 51- 4827232 -6 231584 229594479 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 94.49 51- 8526048 -8 231682 229484415 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 9.28 51- 60501842 231683 229442849 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 80.58 51- 5938955-6 231684 229790117 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/10/2010 7:45:04 Council Check Register Page - 28 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270.18 51- 5005454 -3 231685 229419456 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,257.64 51- 9011854 -4 231686 229493337 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 58.73 51- 8976004 -9 231687 229669477 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 428.07 51- 8324712 -5 231688 229479803 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 56.92 51- 8997917 -7 231689 229493831 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 62.75 51- 4420190 -3 231690 229075311 1321.6185' LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9.28 51- 65410842 231691 229453228 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,476.17 51- 9189085 -8 231692 229495988 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 341.08 51- 9251919 -0 231693 229498568 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 33.87 51- 68922245 231694 229459167 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 28.27 51- 9422326 -6 231695 229858138 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 208.63 51- 8987646 -8 231696 229670395 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 191.91 51- 9337452 -8 231697 229681342 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 38.75 51- 8102668 -0 231698 229650925 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 4,717.64 51- 6955679 -8 231941 229985873 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 4,534.57 51 -4966303 -6 231942 229781362 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 15,446.20 51- 4888627 -1 231973 230116454 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,073.81 51- 5847121 -5 231974 230289800 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 71,663.55 332600 3111/2010 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 156.39 FEB USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 231575 046339938 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 32.49 FEB USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00004322 231576 046339937 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 188.88 332601 311112010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 408.66 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 231943 54165814 5621.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 408.66 2,327,282.94 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 2,327,282.94 Total Payments 2,327,282.94 R55CKSU . j20000 CITY L NA Council Check Summary 3/5/2010 - 3/11/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 151,504.84 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 912.96 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,004.13 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 833.75 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 1,000.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,202.50 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,509,295.71 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,852.96 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,270.49 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 87.74 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,869.13 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 56,829.54 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 3,259.15 05800 LIQUOR FUND 198,082.31 05900 UTILITY FUND 385,911.29 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 266.44 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 100.00 Report Totald 2,327,282.94 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policiespd procedure " 11.0 A 3/11,. 7:46:20 Page - 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 1/26/10 - 2/25/10 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/02/01 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/02/12 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/02/16 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/02/17 DEB MANGEN 2010/02/08 JEFF LONG 2010/01/25 JEFF LONG 2010/01/27 JEFF LONG 2010/01/28 JEFF LONG 2010/01/28 JEFF LONG 2010/02/01 JEFF LONG 2010/02/01 JEFF LONG 2010/02/08 JEFF LONG 2010/02/08 JEFF LONG 2010/02/11 JEFF LONG 2010/02/11 JEFF LONG 2010/02/16 JEFF LONG 2010/02/23 JOHN WALLIN 2010/02/01 JOHN WALLIN 2010/02/01 JOHN WALLIN 2010/02/03 JOHN WALLIN 2010/02/16 JOHN WALLIN 2010/02/18 JOHN WALLIN 2010/02/23 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5621.6235 $7.99 SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM ULTIMATE CAMP RESOURC 203 - 723 -4832 CT 1624.6406 $101.96 HOCKEY PROGRAM DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1622.6406 $35.61 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES* 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5621.6235 $445.00 MCFOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE GOVTTRNGSVC 651 - 222 -7409 MN 1180.6104 $64.95 SUBSCRIPTION OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS, IN 714- 544 -7776 CA 1400.6105 $85.78 MEMORY CARD MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 1400.6406 $11.79 SHIPPING CHARGES THE UPS STORE #1715 EDINA MN 1400.6406 ($21.45) RETURNS MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 1400.6406 $349.47 INK CARTRIDGES HP HOME STORE 888 - 999 -4747 CO 1400.6406 $225.00 EMERG PREPAREDNESS CLASS MN DEPT HOMELAND SECU 651 - 2017758 MN 1400.6104 $99.55 CERAMIC HEATERS AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6406 $99.56 CERAMIC HEATERS AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6406 $100.39 CERAMIC HEATERS AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6406 $50.19 CERAMIC HEATER AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6406 $14.34 ADMIN STAFF MEETING PERKINS 00010058 EDINA MN 1400.6106 $162.00 WORKSHOP CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY BLOOMINGTON MN 1400.6104 $210.99 ELECTRONIC LEVEL AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1495.6406 $211.07 PLUMBING CODE BOOKS MINNESOTA BOOKSTORE 651 - 2968233 MN 1495.6405 $301.46 COMPUTER CABLES MONOPRICE COM 909 - 989 -6887 CA 1554.6406 $106.63 COUNCIL WORKSHOP PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 $99.70 COUNCIL WORKSHOP PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 $94.42 ADMINISTRATION MEETING PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1120.6106 $2,956.40 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici and procedures da#� " 77 l/o i Fi anager (� �,� o Le • rN�ieee �// REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VII. A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Action Discussion ® Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject:. CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. . Susan Howl ubject: FW: Growing opposition to Living Waters project on Hwy. 62 .ttachments: Petition against Living Waters.pdf RECEIVED MAR 112010 From: Kent Gravelle [ mailto :kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:22 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: ghughes @ci.edina; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Growing opposition to Living Waters project on Hwy. 62 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, The Countryside Horizons Project informed me about a week ago of the Living Waters project by Colonial Church on Highway 62 and then asked me to help circulate a petition opposing it. Attached are the names and addresses of persons I approached at the Democratic Convention at the Valley View Middle School yesterday and who are opposed to the project. I believe other members of the Countryside Horizons Project will or have approached members of the Republican Party with a similar petition. I think there is bi- partisan opposition to this project in the community because it reduces our green space and it will increase the amount of traffic on Tracy Avenue and central Edina in general. I hope you will oppose the Living Waters project. Thank you for your consideration. Kent B. Gravelle 5609 Tracy Avenue Edina, MN 55436 (952) 922 -8596 William & Judith Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 - 927 -9421 Edina City Council RECEIVED March 9, 2010 Dear Council Members; Ntg 111010 I am writing regarding the proposed senior apartment complex in the Countryside neighborhood. When we moved here we purchased our home because it was in a very nice residential area in a suburb close to highways with easy access to Minneapolis. The fire station was enlarged a couple of years ago and fits the community nicely. A 4 story apartment building does not fit the community. We do not understand how this zoning change started out as one that would accommodate a nursing home and turned into one that is made up of; 51 one BR units, 22 one BR plus den units, 24 two BR units, 10 two BR units plus den, 5 three BR units, 28 memory support units and 10 care suites. One hundred and twelve units or 75% of the building will be apartment units, so even though it is being called a senior living facility in reality it is an apartment building. We hope you have looked at the site. We also hope you are listening to the neighbors that have a vested interest in the neighborhood. The proposed apartment building is too large (the length of two football fields, 95 feet wide and 45 plus feet tall). It will be a wall behind Countryside Park. It is being designed to maximize profit for a business that has no vested, interest in our community. The neighbors can see that there has been no thought given to the community and the people that live nearby. This complex will affect more than the neighbors that live within 1,000 feet of the building. There are other concerns such as "traffic, ic, light/smell and noise pollution, pollution to the creek and lower property values. The design of the building does not even fit the construction design of the fire station or the church. We are not asking you to remove are asking you to keep the zoning built in a residential neighborhood have all supported by keeping ou r every year. Thank you, Bill Rodgers a building that is already in the neighborhood. We as it is and not allow an apartment building to be Let us maintain. the neighborhood and city we property within city codes and paying our taxes Susan Howl ubject: FW: Colonial Living Waters RECEIVED MAR 112010 From: FranzSr @aol.com [mailto:FranzSr @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:32 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague; JhHoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Colonial Living Waters Edina City Officials; As an Edina resident for some 62 years, I have been extremely proud of our Village /City. Our schools, parks, playgrounds, commercial sites, fire and police, are the best in the Nation. My wife and I have had very few occasions to object to the management of our resources. We built our house at 5832 Olinger Blvd. nearly 40 years ago and have enjoyed a quiet, peaceful, vibrant neighborhood for all of that time. Now it appears there is a possibility that the Countryside area could be destroyed by the Colonial Church Living Waters Project. We are totally against this construction. I am sure you are aware of the size of this project and the negative effects it would have on our area. The proposed low income units would bring more problems and traffic not welcome in Countryside. Colonial is proud of the Global Outreach programs they have sponsored over the years, yet they have made no outreach to their local neighbors. We live across the street from the church and they made no effort to contact us with their proposal. You would think that it might occur to the members that a huge building with a roof peaking as high as their church tower might infringe on our view of the surrounding area and more than likely effect our property values. The Project is an apartment. People move in and out. That is not the definition of a stable home environment. There is obviously a profit to be gained from this construction. At our expense. Ve urge you to deny the construction of this massively invasive Project. Imagine that it would be happening in your own pack yard. We will be attending meetings and adding our voice to all of those neighbors who object to this Franz and Joanie Burris Susan Howl From: Sent: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Lynette Biunno Monday, March 08, 2010 8:37 AM Susan Howl FW: Growing opposition to Living Waters project on Hwy. 62 Petition against Living Waters.pdf RECEIVED MAR 112010 Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: Kent Grave)le [ma ilto: kentgravelle@g ravellelaw.com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:22 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: ghughes @ci.edina; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Growing opposition to Living Waters project on Hwy. 62 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, The Countryside Horizons Project informed me about a week ago of the Living Waters project by Colonial Church on Highway 62 and then asked me to help circulate a petition opposing it. Attached are the names and addresses of persons I approached at the Democratic Convention at the Valley View Middle School yesterday and who are opposed to the project. I believe other members of the Countryside Horizons Project will or have approached members of the Republican Party with a similar petition. I think there is bi- partisan opposition to this project in the community because it reduces our green space and it will increase the amount of traffic on Tracy Avenue and central Edina in general. I hope you will oppose the Living Waters project. Thank you for your consideration. Kent B. Gravelle 5609 Tracy Avenue Edina, MN 55436 (952) 922 -8596 PETITION OPPOSING LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT If the Edina Planning Commission and City Council give final approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football fields wide to be located near the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Highway 62 (behind the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of central Edina will be changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy Avenue and the surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to•this project and request that the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. Name Address Email 1, ZE&Jj 6eAV&LL. 5609 T1;ACY AVE . EALMA kEIJr6RAYEt.L'9,40L.toA4 2. C/le/t J -on-cS ,I id 6. 7. 8zCA'. • W.Frz 2 (mil o�into �2 I IPJl . \ od1 P5(a3 C..• nQ ►1`1 oto bt-„der 20( �LSx A M G e s 4-(.Pr P9"L a c �(vO,SJ 7-f 6cn G , /127` 9a57 13. 14 w�w.q r ';�7 <9�' C' C) V4 IR PETITION OPPOSING LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUMMSON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT If the Edina Planning Commission and City' Council give final approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football fields wide to be located near the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Highway 62 (behind the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of central Edina will be changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy Avenue and the surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to this project and request that the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. Name . Address Email ►L 16. Na-rk kora-y >v iii 6%c4 roa �e .9r',yz Ss't 3S 17. 5ud It AR c� 18. ,ow� YL 0 20-a".- - 3 21:2 1 1 23. 24. 42 Og A n+ Y i M ``1 5-1- e-s- 0VAV?VS 25. / KOWT6o A-4 �-A- Cho r►- `�"c,�'a �¢' �' C'.WXV� 26. ( 044 00� g 12K� •L��►6• l ylGt der, e-/rncl- �6�i'01/I�/�T/'`�4 /- 28. tf ,r�s�voCI� Cary Teague Director of Planning 5801 West 50th Street Edina Mn 55424 Dear Mr. Teague, March 3, 2010 Re: Proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina development I was unable to attend the February 16 meeting of the City Council at which time preliminary approval for the rezoning and development plan for. the above project was given by the Council. However, on January 17, I communicated my concerns and opposition to the plan in writing to the Planning Commission. An 8" x 10" photo of the Presbyterian Home at 98th and Penn in Richfield is enclosed. This is the same height as the Waters development. It is HUGE. A facility of this size would be totally inappropriate for the site that has been proposed. The plan calls for a building two football fields in length, 600 feet wide and four stories in height. In my opinion, the Council has not served the residents of the Countryside District well by giving preliminary approval to this behemoth development in a quiet neighborhood. I am told that presentations at the February 16 Council meeting pointing out the huge size of the development were received impassively by Council members. Let me state again my objections and concerns. The increased traffic flow will only add to the existing heavy traffic on Tracy Avenue. Exiting from Highway 62 (from both directions) is hazardous because visibility is restricted by the bridge railings. If a semaphore(s) are erected to control the flow of traffic the area will cease looking like a residential area. The size of the proposed development destroys the quiet neighborhood aura that has been an asset of the Countryside District. I am fearful this will have a negative impact on housing values. Notification of the proposed development has been distributed only to residents living within 1000 feet of the property. The size of the development will affect all residents living between Highway 62 and Vernon Ave. Yet only a few residents have been notified. I understand that the City has complied with the letter of the law. However, there are still many residents that are not informed about this project. I would expect you, as an elected city official, to act as an advocate for residents and instruct the Planning Department to go beyond the statutes and inform all residents within at least one mile of the site. Final approval of the Waters development sets a horrible precedent for more commercial type development in this area and therefore more potential deterioration of property values. I would urge you as a responsible member of the City Council to do your own due diligence on this proposal to determine that it is, indeed, inappropriate to place the facility in a residential area. Please vote NO when it is time to vote for final approval. Sincerely, 11`rr� Spencer A. Turner 6208 Hillside Rd. Edina, MN 55436 952 - 929 -6216 sturnerl2keomeast.net Originals to Edina Mayor and City Council Members TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: The Harris Familylvia Edina Planning Department RE: The Waters DATE: March 4, 2010 Mrs. Harris called the Planning Department and expressed the opinion that Edina doesn't need another assisted living facility. Mrs. Harris also expressed the opinion that too many large trees will be removed to "make -way" for this development. Susan Howl Abject: Senior Housing Project Dear Mayor Hovland, RECEIVED MAR 12 2010 I've been following the proposed construction of a huge senior - housing complex adjacent to Colonial Church and in December attended the info session sponsored by the developer. On Sunday I walked around the building site. The immensity of the proposed facility is simply incomprehensible. A building two football fields in length and as tall as a church steeple is in no way in accord with the Edina Comprehensive Plan's guideline "that the appearance and compatibility of a particular land use are as important as the use itself." Neither the size nor style — is it Houston style? — matches other architecture in our city or indicates the designers know anything about Edina or care much about preserving its charm. I am also apprehensive about what will happen if the complex hits financial difficulties. Is the city going to wind up with a deteriorating white elephant? If so, when the church and the developers come back to the city council for a zoning change to convert a gigantic failure and eyesore into something besides senior housing, won't they have the city over a barrel? The sweetness of any possible tax revenues needs to be soberly balanced against the risks. The developers claim they cannot reduce the size and scope of the project, that two stories and half as many rooms is not feasible. They also stated at the December meeting that like it or not, the property will be developed, and Edina residents will either have to accept this one or else something akin to a "Section -8 Housing Project." No kidding? Are those our only choices? I encourage you and the members of our city council to call the developers' bluff. If a plan for a facility on a scale suitable for Edina is out of the question, then they need to be told to build elsewhere. I'm betting plans for a more reasonable, less risky project will be forthcoming. I predict Edina will come to bitterly regret it should this project be allowed to go forward as planned. Thanks, Jose Hanson 5712 Olinder Blvd (952) 915 -9723 i as Lc) Lf (.D C) A� tom, 4 t-Luol"VA, -2 A C4 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Highlands Elementary RECEIVED Subject: Highlands Elementary MAR 1 1 1010 Good Morning Mayor and Edina Council Members, My name is Jason Pusey and I am a third grade teacher at Highlands Elementary. Every two years (I teach a group of kids for both 3rd and 4th grade) my kids do a study of how communities make their decisions. Two years ago Scot Housh and Linda Masica were very generous with their time and came by to talk with my 3rd graders about working in the Edina city government. The personal touch helped the kids connect what we were studying in class to their own community. I know you have busy schedules but I was wondering if any of you might be available to get together with my third grade class as well as my teaching partner's class and tell them a little about your role in shaping the Edina community. We would love to invite you to our class and /or we would be very interested in paying a visit to City Hall and taking a tour. We have a field trip to the state capitol scheduled for March 24th and I think that combining that trip with a stop by the Edina City Hall would be a great culminating celebration of our study of communities and their decisions. Let me know if any of you can work something out or if you have any questions. Thank you for your time and attention. Ja4aw Pu4ey 3rd Grade Teacher Highlands Elementary Edina, MN 952 - 848 -4540 Edina Public Art Committee - MINUTES - 2/04/2010 Mayor's Conference Room, Edina City Hall 4pm Present: Bernice Amacher, Brad Benn, Dick Crockett, Rick Fesler, Amy Kerber Linda Kieffer, Lois Ring, Anne Spooner and Ruth Valgemae. Not present: Bill McCabe January 7, 2010 MINUTES approved. CONTINUING BUSINESS The postmark deadline for new sculpture entries is March 31. Brad Benn has received two new entries. The Turtle (recently purchased) and Gyr Family sculptures will remain in place for the 2010 season. Fund Raising- Rick Fesler reports making contact with one prospective Donor who expressed real interest EPAC. Amy Kerber reports she has not yet received a response from the 4 letters she sent to potential donors. She also spoke with the Edina Garden Council about partnering with them but it will conflict with the annual garden sale. At this time, no decision has been made as to the Garden Club purchasing the River Spirit sculpture. As a possible children's art project, Diane Plunkett Latham from the Garden Club suggested placing decorated recycle containers throughout Edina as a way to promote recycling. Bernice Amacher confirmed she will send out letters to other potential Donors. Application to Edina Rotary is being finalized. Brad Benn said that we have passed the deadline to apply for a Target Co. Grant. He will try contacting an individual Target Store as there may be a commercial sponsorship opportunity available. Dick Crockett, Linda Kieffer, and Lois Ring met with Heather Worthington and John Keprios to discuss fund - raising ideas for EPAC, raising public awareness of EPAC activities, as well as the City Budget outlook for 2011. Fund - raising ideas included: selling engravable pavers along the Promenade, golf cart tours along the Promenade, perhaps with food vendors who would donate a portion of their proceeds to our committee, selling EPAC buttons at City events (e.g. Centennial Lakes boat races, band concerts, Edina Art Fair, Fall into the Arts. etc.) Linda Kieffer will follow -up on the feasibility of engraving the pavers. John Keprios reported that motorized vehicles (such as golf carts) are not allowed on the Promenade, but that we could look into a special "conference bike" that would hold six people. John Keprios advised us to check with Tom Shirley re: having food vendors along the Promenade and selling buttons at various Centennial Lakes events. Also it would be advisable to check with Pat Dawson and Ken Rosland, organizers of Fall into the Arts. Linda Kieffer will contact Rachel Hubbard about selling buttons at the Art Fair. John Keprios suggested setting up a meeting with Jennifer Bennerotte about more intensive marketing of EPAC. Lois Ring contacted the Edina Liquor Store Manager about selling EPAC buttons at the store to customers. No final word yet. Lois Ring also researched costs and reported that for $290, we would receive 1,000 buttons. As an incentive, Dick Crockett suggested obtaining merchant discounts and an Edina Art Center discount with purchase of the button. The 2011 City Budget- Heather Worthington reported that it will likely be as bleak as 2010. She said to go ahead and request funding for 2011 but perhaps ask for less ($5,000 instead of $10,000). She will set up a special workshop with EPAC members and the City Council in April to discuss funding concerns and the status of EPAC (committee of the EAC board or independent commission). More discussion of this topic will continue at the next EPAC meeting.. Linda Kieffer researched public art funding through the Minnesota State Arts Board. EPAC does not meet the criteria required to be considered for a grant. Marketing and Promotion- It was confirmed that press releases regarding the Promenade are on the City of Edina website. A suggestion was made to place pictures of all pieces owned by the city on the website to further promote awareness. It would be nice to have another sculpture at City Hall. Dick Crockett reported that the Raven is very much appreciated. NEW BUSINESS It was reported that Diana Hedges would be in favor of EPAC and EAC working together on a fund - raising project. Edina is forming a City Veterans' Memorial committee. Whether the memorial will honor all veterans who served or those who died serving their country is not known at this time. Perhaps EPAC will be asked to help in the selection process. Meeting adjourned at 5:35 Minutes taken by Bernice Amacher and Anne Spooner Next meeting will be March 4 @ 4pm NEpgAGE OF EDINq 9 v m� �AFNCE FOP flerita e o SENIOR /ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITY Roybet - Rembrandt Manor - Tiffany March 3, 2010 RECEIVED Dear Mayor James Hovland, MAR 112010 My name is Maria Field, CEO and owner of Heritage of Edina, Senior /Assisted Living. When I attended the council meeting on Feb. 16, 2010, I was very disappointed that no one mentioned Heritage of Edina Assisted Living, even though we have been here for 50 years. The. fact that we have been. taxpayers for all of those years doesn't seem to matter either, and yet'when Ladd up the years and amounts of property taxes we have paid it is in the millions. Then when you add up all the other taxes we pay on goods and services, plus the people we employ and the Edina . Residents we have cared for, we feel we have added many more millions to the community in 50 years. To be brushed aside as if we don't make a difference makes it seem the life of Wayne Field, the founder, really didn't matter, like his belief in "Reverence for Life " - was for naught. Wayne died in Feb. 2009, and we all promised him we would carry on his legacy. We have cared for generations of families and have had to change from a nursing home and 3 retirement homes to all Assisted Living in 1999 because of the overbuilding of retirement buildings and the decrease of residents, which. created -a situation where we couldn't sell the . complex and just about went under. By 2001 we were running at around 90% capacity which continued until 2007. Then in 2008 we had a large number of deaths of Residents who had lived with us for many years and have not been able to recoup since then because of the economy and especially because potential residents cannot sell their homes. Why would you approve of a non -tax paying entity to be built when it will also.- need our tax dollars to subsidize it? Where is the fairness to force us as tax payers. to help put a copetitor in . business, while probably putting us out of business? With State tax revenues in decline, where. is the money coming from? The fact that they are spending 40 million on 150 units when we have 257 apts. and a mortgage of 13 million is why they will have to charge $3,000.00 to $9,000.00 per resident and we only charge $1,000.00 to $5,000.00. Heritage of Edina N only-2.9 miles from- the site and only one of at least a dozen Assisted Living facilities in the area of Edina, Richfield and Bloomington. We are - private pay, but 1/3 of our Residents are in the Elderly Waiver program. The forecast for the future is rather bleak for starting another Assisted. Living facility at this time. if the Council could hold off until the economy improves, it would be better for everyone. As a resident and voter in Edina, as I did vote for each of you on the City Council, I would hope you are guided by the Edina Vision 20/20 mission statement to "guide the development and redevelopment of lands within the City all in a manner which sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by the residents and business of Edina ". We at Heritage of Edina .believe that approving another 150 units is not in the best interest of business or residents at this time. Thank you, Maria Field, CEO 3434 Heritage Drive, Edina, Minnesota 55435 • Phone: 952- 920 -9145 • Fax: 952- 915 -5411 Ak WSB d Assoc- Engineering ■ Planning ■ Environmental ■ Construction 4140 Thielman Lane Suite 204 St. Cloud, MN 56301 Tel: 320 - 252 -4900 Fax: 320- 252 -3100 February 24, 2010 Ms. Lisa Freese Transportation Program Manager Scott County Public Works Division 600 County Trail East Jordan, MN 55353 Re: US Highway 169 Corridor Coalition Corridor Advocate Dear Ms. Freese: Thank you for the opportunity to propose for the Corridor Advocate position with the US Highway 169 Corridor Coalition. Doug Weiszhaar and WSB & Associates currently serve in this position for three similar interest groups — the I -94 West Corridor Coalition, the TH 23 Corridor Coalition, and Cass County, MN. We at WSB understand the importance of having advocacy groups support the need for improved safety and mobility in transportation corridors. In this case, US 169 is the primary connection between the Twin Cities metro area and south central Minnesota. An important component in recruiting members to the organization is to develop support materials to utilize in recruiting local governments, businesses, and chambers of commerce. We have been extremely successful in the development of these tools for our clients and in the delivery of these tools in recruiting new members. We have attached to this letter a few samples of the tools we have developed. The second and equally important function which you need your Corridor Advocate to provide is assistance in lobbying the state and federal governments to prioritize and fund the projects your organization determines are important to the overall safety and economic health of your area. The attached tools have worked well in both member recruitment and lobbying efforts for our other client interest groups. Neither Doug Weiszhaar nor WSB are registered lobbyists at either the state or federal level, but we have a great deal of experience in working with lobbyists and their firms. In addition, Doug has a personal relationship with many elected individuals, their staff, and agency employees which is helpful in arranging meetings and providing information. Details of our proposal continue on the following pages. We look forward to discussing the opportunity further with you and ask that you please feel free to call Doug Weiszhaar at any of the numbers below. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, W.SB & Associates. Inc. Douglas Weiszhaar, PE Vice President 320.534.5941 (St. Cloud Office) 763.287.8310 (Minneapolis Office) Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer 612.360.1285 (cell) Ms. Lisa Freese February 24, 2010 Page 2 Key Personnel Doug Weiszhaar, PE — Project Manager Doug has over 30 years of experience working with local governments to deliver successful projects. In his 23 years as a County engineer, he worked with many Cities as well as state and federal agencies, providing the cooperation necessary in project delivery. He has worked in County engineering for Stearns, Chisago, and Ottertail counties. Doug was also appointed Deputy Commissioner/ Chief Engineer for the Minnesota Department of Transportation. In that position, he was instrumental in putting together the funding packages for and delivering such major projects as the Hiawatha LRT and the R0052 highway project. Doug was the representative for the American Council of Engineering Companies on the Minnesotans for Better Roads and Transit steering committee and the Progress in Motion Board of Directors. He was very active in the passage of transportation revenue enhancements. As an active Proj ect Manager and Principal for multiple clients, Doug is an experienced problem solver, communicator, and resolver of issues. Brandi Popenhagen, PE — Project Engineer Brandi is a Project Manager in our Transportation Group with over ten years of experience. Her experience includes various phases of preliminary design including corridor studies, environmental documentation, traffic analysis, forecasting, design study reports, interchange location studies, alternative access reports, work zone alternatives, interchange, and highway design. Final design experience includes right of way plats, engineer estimates, highway design, and special provisions. Brandi's environmental and corridor experience has allowed her to develop exceptional skills in public involvement and education, working with governmental agencies on complex issues, and mitigation of traffic and environmental impacts on a corridor and its residents. Amy Lee — Administration Amy has over 20 years of experience completing various tasks involved with administration. She currently serves WSB's St. Cloud office as office administrator, where she excels at managing multiple projects simultaneously. She is thorough, detail oriented, and efficient. Amy is well- versed in all Microsoft Office programs and acting as support to WSB's engineering staff and our clients. Work Plan As Corridor Advocate, WSB shall perform the following duties: Task 1: Assist the Client in the expansion of the US Highway 169 Corridor Coalition by advising and assisting in the recruitment strategy. Task 2: Assist in the development of a clear set of goals, including financial goals that are being sought. Task 3: Arrange recruitment meetings with elected officials, staff, agency staff, chamber of commerce executive directors, and individual business owners. Task 4: Attend recruitment meetings as requested by the Corridor Coalition. This may include the Corridor Coalition, elected officials, agency staff, or individual interests. Task 5: Update information periodically to keep message fresh. Ms. Lisa Freese February 24, 2010 Page 3 Services Provided WSB proposes to provide these services within Corridor Advocate budget. No outside resources are planned. Service Provided Key Personnel Hours Total Fee Recruit units of government for membership Doug Weiszhaar 25 $3,350 Brandi Popenhagen 25 $2,800 Amy Lee 12 $744 Recruit businesses and chambers of commerce for membership Doug Weiszhaar 30 $4,020 Brandi Popenhagen 30 $3,360 Amy Lee 12 $744 TOTAL 1 $15,018 Optional Services As requested, WSB is prepared to provide the administrative support as spelled out in the RFP. Optional Task A: Prepare documentation to present and sell plan. This will include written and graphic documents which can be distributed to the public and elected officials. This optional task is a strength of WSB, as evidenced by the examples we have attached to this proposal. We are proud of the exhibits we have prepared and the effectiveness and success they have had for our clients. Optional Task B: Prepare monthly meeting agendas, meeting minutes, membership directories, and mailing lists. Attend all meetings of the Coalition Executive Committee and Board. Attend Technical Committee meetings quarterly. Although WSB is fully prepared to complete this task, most other clients find it most cost effective to cover this task with their own resources. Optional Task C: Provide, host, and maintain the US Highway 169 Corridor Coalition website. This will include posting meeting agendas and minutes to the website and providing one major update per year. Optional task costs will be discussed as requested by the Coalition and negotiated at that time. Linking the Metro with Greater Minnesota IH N 94 WEST, ORTHVY SU hamb- .--tommexc I -94 CORRIDOR Unktng the Metro wtfh, Greater Minnesota The !Need: Additional capacity on 1 -94 between Monticello and Maple Grove. The Reasons: An Eaonornfa Dev'efoprnent Cordd'c Over 750 businesses operate within the corridor area utilizing 1 -94 to move their products and transport their employees and customers. A Transtt Corrtdar This segment of 1 -94 is included in the Metropolitan Council 2030 Transportation Policy Plan as an Express Bus Corridor. The vibrant recreation areas of central Minnesota create severe congestion issues on this segment of 1 -94. i t � A Key Freight Corridor Freight is big business. Trucking currently moves 61% of all freight by weight and 65% of all freight by value. Truck freight is expected to double by 2030. Crash rates on this segment of 1 -94 are as much as twice the state wide average for a rural freeway section. Congestion creates traffic "shockwaves" which can propogate higher risks of crashes. The Cost ofM,obliffy (2008$) TH 25 to TH 101 Four lane to six lane 14.6 miles $154.8 M Bridge widenings $ 5.1 M Engineering $ 27.2 M Right of way $ 0 TOTAL $187.1 M RYY? rrrrrrrrrrrrr .! ,e P m .a .+,9 ,• ,s f ,a Pa ,e TH 101 to 1 -494 Six lane to eight lane 8.8 miles $128.5 M Bridge widenings $ 6.4 M Engineering $ 23.0 M Right of way $ 96.8 M TOTAL $254.7 M NB w...,3r'W. •.. �';r °,o ,►rsr }�y °,lrsr,Rrdrry',,sa A Key Freight Corridor Freight is big business. Trucking currently moves 61% of all freight by weight and 65% of all freight by value. Truck freight is expected to double by 2030. Crash rates on this segment of 1 -94 are as much as twice the state wide average for a rural freeway section. Congestion creates traffic "shockwaves" which can propogate higher risks of crashes. The Cost ofM,obliffy (2008$) TH 25 to TH 101 Four lane to six lane 14.6 miles $154.8 M Bridge widenings $ 5.1 M Engineering $ 27.2 M Right of way $ 0 TOTAL $187.1 M RYY? rrrrrrrrrrrrr .! ,e P m .a .+,9 ,• ,s f ,a Pa ,e TH 101 to 1 -494 Six lane to eight lane 8.8 miles $128.5 M Bridge widenings $ 6.4 M Engineering $ 23.0 M Right of way $ 96.8 M TOTAL $254.7 M I -94 West Corridor Coalition: Linking the Metro to Greater Minnesota Of the thousands of miles of highway throughout the state of Minnesota, few have as large and as diverse of a population of commuters as the 1 -94 West Corridor. Stretching from Maple Grove to Monticello, the Corridor connects the Twin Cities Metro Area to Greater Minnesota which translates into thousands of motorists utilizing this stretch of highway each day including commuters who work in the Twin Cities; truck drivers hauling supplies to, through, and from Greater Minnesota and vacationing families who make up a significant portion of the state's $10 billion tourism industry. Unfortunately, the infrastructure required to accommodate the volume of motorists has not been adequately maintained. Motorists repeatedly find themselves crawling along the Corridor at a snail's pace resulting in families spending less time on vacation; employees spending less time at work, and business owners spending more time waiting for supplies. To address these ongoing economic challenges, local communities, local businesses, and the 1 -94 West Chamber of Commerce are forming the Minnesota 1 - -94 West Corridor Coalition. The Minnesota 1-94 West Corridor Coalition will be a Coalition of local governments, private businesses, local Chambers of Commerce, and other stakeholders affected by the aforementioned transportation challenges that have joined together to advance the effort to expand capacity on one of Minnesota's most important transportation corridors — "The 1 -94 West Corridor — Linking the Metro the Greater Minnesota" The Coalition has joined together to organize a campaign to.support a concerted effort to raise public awareness and advance the cause for much - needed increased investment in Minnesota's and America's aging infrastructure. Join the Growing List Resolutions of Support: 1 -94 West Chamber City of Albertville City of Dayton City of Otsego City of Rogers City of St. Michael Monticello Area Chamber Elk River Area Chamber For further information or to join the Coalition, Kathleen Poate, 1 -94 West Chamber, 763.428.2921 or kpoate(cDi94 westch amber. org Special thanks to Pinnacle Printing,, St. Michael, for complimentary printing. T��A1N'J apo�TA�TJIHJ OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE IS RIDING ON IT! April 2008 PRIORITY 2 TH 23 Highway Corridor Study I -90 to Willmar This 101 -mile segment of TH 23 is an interregional corridor designated by Mn /DOT in 2002. The corridor traverses the region from southwest to northeast. This region has historically been lightly serviced by a transportation system particularly as it related to freight movements. With the well -known connection between good transportation and a healthy economy, the TH 23 corridor can support a stronger economy in the region, including the cities of Pipestone, Marshall, Granite Falls, and Willmar. TH 23 connects the region to the major transportation corridors of 1 -90 to the south and 1 -94 to the north. Areas of Minnesota More than 30 Miles from a Major Divided Highway in 2007 S Mn DOT T—K H,gnway daias O—led Hgp—y Divided Highway Ml- 3 mke nk Highway 23 Divided Highway miles D mass The TH 23 corridor serves many functions. It is an energy corridor, an agriculture corridor, a freight corridor, and a community connection corridor. Interregional Corridors and Regional Trade Centers ON 0412MS Susan -Howl I ubject: FW: March 11, 2010 US Hwy Executive Committee Agenda .ttachments: US Hwy 169 Exec Cmte Meeting Minutes 021110 DRAFT.doc Executive Committee Meeting Scott County Government Center Board Conference Room 200 Fourth Avenue West Shakopee, MN March 11, 2010 5:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Welcome /Introductions — James Hovland, Chair, City of Edina 2. Adoption of Minutes 3. Financial Report 4. Technical Committee Report a. Schedule of- Meeting Locations and Educational Programs b. Corridor Advocate Interview Update & Recommendation 5. Corridor Advocate Update — None 6. Other Items a. Project Prioritization Discussion 7. Next Meeting Agenda, April 8th, 2010 1 RECEIVED MAR 11 '[010 US Hwy 169 Corridor Coalition Working together to enhance safety, reduce congestion and maximize economic development along the US Highway169 inter- regional corridor. Executive Committee Meeting Minutes February 11, 2010 Present: Jim Hovland, Jon Ulrich, Michael Leek, Lezlie Vermillion, Tom McLaughlin, Tom Hulting, Lisa Freese, and Lisa ,Schickeidanz The meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. by Chair, Mr. Jim Hovland 1) Welcome — Jim Hovland, Chair, City +of Edina Mayor ! 2) Adoption of Minutes ,'Commissioner Ulrich; #motioned for the approval of the January 14, 2010 'meeting minutes. Commissioner McLaughlin seconded the motion, which, passed unanimously. 3) Financial Reportl= The financial report through January 31, 2010 was distributed,iand reviewed. Most of the dues for•this year have been collected., Neil Peterson has submitted his resignation. His last payment in January should have;,included the,most recent services. Will provide the, total ;amount that has'been, paid to Mr. Peterson, roughly between ,. $7,000"'$8 000. Commissioner McLaugllin motioned for approval, Commissioner Ulrich seconded the motion and the board'voted to''approve the report. 4) Technical Committee Report — a) Treasurer Position Nominations- There has been one nomin "ation, Council Member Hulting for the Treasurer position. Bring the nomination to the Board. The upcoming elections are in June. b) Meeting Locations and Educational Programs- The tentative 2010 Coalition Meeting Schedule was handed out and discussed. 'Need. to add the 2011 work plan to the schedule which might' work to add to the night of election officers or the following month. Discussion on moving the legislative wrap -up 2 -11 -10 Executive Meeting Minutes Page 1 to June (will be closer to the end of the legislative session). It would be a good idea to have the legislative wrap -up at the center of the corridor. Discussion to add a tour of the Port of Savage to the August meeting. The Lower Minnesota River District provides tours of the port. LeSueur County may have their own topic they would like to have at the May meeting. c) Corridor Staffing RFP- Handed out the draft RFP prepared by Jane Kansier. Added more tasks mostly under #4 to provide administrative. support. Discussion. on' the addition of #4 to RFP. Discussed who to send RFW;S t&"' ' Decided it was best to add an introduction page to th& RFP` to spell out that the applicant can bid all parts or,part's 1 =3: ;Take out reference to the budget in the RFP. The'Technical Committee can do the initial review and interviews of the submitted RFP's; to get the options down to two or:three. Add "County, City, Townships, and Governmental Agencies" to number 1 on RFP. J. d) Interim Websife` Maintenance Plan'` &� Budget- Commissioner ", J�: UlrichJmotioned toitcontinueto; have Eric;, work as a consultant to maintamjthe web -site for tl '61'6 -d' xt few months. Commissioner till 10. McJLaugl li`n;seconded;the,'motion, which passed unanimously. 5) Corridor Advocate Update — None'. f : 1 6)''(The'E) e&Otive Board meetingadjourned at 7:02 p:m. Re's' peetfully Submitted, by 'Li`sa; Schickedanz, Scott County Associate Planner 2 -11 -10 Executive Meeting Minutes „ Page 2 Susan Howl Subject: FW: March 11, 2010 US Hwy 169 Corridor Coalition Board Meeting Attachments: US 169 Board Mtg Minutes 021110 DRAFT.doc Board Meeting Scott County Government Center Board Room 200 Fourth Avenue West Shakopee, MN March 11, 2010 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Welcome /Introductions — James Hovland, Chair, City of Edina 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Education Program: None Scheduled 4. Adoption of Minutes 5. Financial Report 6. Executive Committee Report 7. Technical Committee Report a. Schedule of Meeting Locations and Educational Programs b. Corridor Advocate Interview Update & Recommendation 8. Other Items a. I494/169 Project Update b. Project Prioritization Discussion 9. Next Meeting — April 8, 2010, Scott County Board Room 10. Adjournment 1 RECEIVED MAR 1 1 2010 US Hwy 169 Corridor Coalition Working together to enhance safety, reduce congestion and maximize economic development along the US Highway169 inter - regional corridor. Membership Board Meeting Minutes February 11, 2010; ,' ;. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Chair, Mr. Hovlarid' _ Members Present: Name Title ' ';;;, 'Agency Tim Strand Mayor City of St. Peter John Kvamme City Council Citv of St. Peter Lisa Freese Trans ortation Pro' ram Manager,` Scott County Terry Genelin Nicollet Cty Townshi''s R -9 ACT Region Nine Dev Comm James Stenson Commissioner Nicollet County Ron Jabs ,;;; ;Board'Re resentatiVe z ` , '' "� .'., : Cify of Jordan Seth Greenwood ilk; !' En ineer %Public Works.Director Nicollet County Ed Wetherill ;Ji ,city Council :;;;;' City of St. Peter Mark B'elland `iS6Q ra `li';�De artmehtti ,, Gustavus Adolphus College Dean WahlundI' i ;,;;,, Dir' O o` Fmunication Services Gustavus Adolphus College Jim Hovland 'r'' ; , Ma ori� "' ?, ., City of Edina Jon uirich "Commissioner ' l' ' Scott County Lezlie Vermillion De' u Coun , Administrator Scott County Fred Corri an'.; Council Member Bonestroo Jerry Pfeifer _ Council:Member City of St. Peter Lewis Giesking Director of Public Works City of St. Peter Jeff Johnson City Engineer City of Mankato Michael Leek ' Cormi nunity Development Dir. City of Shakopee Tom Hultin " Council Member City of Bloomington Gene Abbott Council Member City of Sava e Mark McNeill Ci Administrator City of Shakopee John Schmitt Mayor City of Shakopee Judy Hanson Commissioner Nicollet County Tom McLaughlin Commissioner Blue Earth County Alan Forsberg En ineer /Public Works Director I Blue Earth County Lisa Schickedanz Associate Planner I Scott County 02 -11 -10 Membership Board Meeting Page 1 1) Welcome/ Introductions ' Chair Hovland welcomed the group and requested each member to introduce themselves and their affiliations. 2) Adoption of Agenda Chair Hovland proceeded with the agenda. Mayor Strand, motioned for approval, Council Member Abbott seconded the motion, which passed unanimously::;, 3) Education Program ' Dr. Mark Bjelland, Professor of Geography at Gustavus; Adolphus College, presented a Power Point presentation on importance of liegional Centers in `G`reater Minnesota. Dean Wahlund, Director of Communication Services & Special; Events at Gustavus Adolphus College. Spoke about the importance tht,;A9 coiridor has on tlie;college, the city, and how they all work together.,, Gave update on the ;median project in St.' Peter. 4) Adoption of Minutes i Commissioner McLaughlin motioned for :the approval of the January 14, 2010 meeting minutes. Commissioner Ulrich:seconded the motion,.which passed unanimously. 5) Acceptance of the'Financiat Report Ms. Freese presented financial statement through January 2010 and requested acceptance by the Board. 17% Mayor Schmitt motioned:for app'r'oval, Council Member Abbott seconded the motion and the board voted to approve tlieFreport. 6) Executive Committee Report a) Election of Treasure -Term through June 2010 Chair Hovland noted there has been one nomination Council Member Hulting. Chair Hovland open nominations; there were no additional nominations. Mr. Genelin motioned to appoint Council Member Hulting, Mayor Schmitt seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. 02 -11 -10 Membership Board Meeting Page 2 b) Corridor Staffing- Mr. Peterson has submitted his resignation which was e- mailed out. Discussed the RFP process to fill the role of Corridor Advocate. Commissioner Ulrich motioned to move forward with the RFP process as discussed. Commissioner Hanson seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. c) Web -site- Commissioner Ulrich motioned to move forward with web -site as by the Executive Committee. Mayor Schmitt seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. 7) Technical Committee Report The 2010 Coalition Meeting Schedule was handed out and discussed. There will be a few changes to the schedule as discussed at the' Executive Committee Meeting. An updated schedule will be emailed to the members. Let the Technical Committee know if you other suggestions or recommendations for the meeting schedule. 8) I494/169 Update The project is a high priority for; MNDOT. Expect,to; hear next week if the project will receive TIGER funding appro4!. Stknulus 2 funding' might be another funding source for the project. MNDOT may have;s6i&internal resources to fund the project, which could be used in combination with: either d",11GER or Stimulus 2 funds. They have Ila �iIt. �rl F�' 'Ix decided to go with' thel performance: base design � Right-6f-Way is being purchased right now. Would4lbe `great!to. get this project d(AO' then the Coalition could move attention to other parts 6f the corridor: 9 ) Next Meetin Date`` Next meeting is March 11, 2d10 at 7:00'pm, Scott County Board Room 10) Meeting adjourned at 8:37'p.m. Respectfully submitted' by Lisa .Schickedanz, Scott County Associate Planner 02 -11 -10 Membership Board Meeting Page 3 ZZ.TA, ow Le ISO REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Itern No. VII. A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk F1 Action Discussion ® Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is correspondence received after the packets went out. W Su §an Howl Subject: Opposed to new senior complex in Countryside neighborhood RECEIVED Good evening - MAR 1 u 2010 I am a resident of the Edina Countryside neighborhood and would like to express my opposition to the building of a large senior complex near the Colonial Church in Edina. This area already has a large senior development and the addition of hundreds of additional residents would change the livability of the neighborhood. The exit off of 62 Westbound to Tracy northbound is very troublesome already, and adding many drivers to this intersection would cause substantial traffic flow problems. I am concerned that this major development was not brought to the neighborhood's attention early on in the process. Regards, Tom Kluis Edina, MN 612 - 730 -4558 Susan Howl Subject: For the City Council members RECEIVED 151010 To the Edina City Council: MAR My wife and I want to express our opinion on the Human Rights & Relations Commission domestic partnership ordinances. We agree with Scot Housh that the Edina City Council should stick to issues relating to public safety and infrastructure. We have state and federal laws to abide by, without starting to create new ones. Thanks for your time, Nan and Al Kasid 1 I Edina Regional Office 7550 France Avenue South _ _ 4 Edina, MN 55435 -5624 952- 844 -6000 Fax 952 - 844 -6099 BURNET RECEIVED www.cbbumet.com MAR 161010 March 12, 2010 City Hall Attn: Edina City Council 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 1 55424 Dear Councilmembers Housh, Bennett, Swenson, and Brindle, and Mayor Hovland: I am writing to you to express my interest in the coming replacement of City Manager Gordon Hughes, whom I understand will be retiring as of July, 2010. Having discussed this issue with various residents throughout Edina, I believe the following criteria should be considered to ensure the selection process best benefits the public interest: (1) Hire an outside search company to ensure a broad, qualified pool of external applicants is considered for the position; (2) Set up a search committee of Council Members andlor- residents to consider what qualifications and attributes of our next City Manager will best serve the future of Edina; (3) Have the search committee report to Council during Council's regularly scheduled and televised meetings so that the public remains informed about the search progress and its findings; and (4) Take plenty of time for the search process to occur. This decision is too important to be rushed and simply need not be, given that the current staff (including the Assistant City Manager) is more than capable of running city hall for a short while following Mr. Hughes' July departure. I appreciate in advance your time and consideration of these matters. Josh Sprague 4720 70a' St West .612 -501 -0252 Owned And Operated By NRT Incorporated. Q Susan Howl Subject: Citizen Input for City Council RECEIVED To Edina City Council regarding City Manager Position: MAR 16 2010 I am an Edina citizen writing regarding Gordon Hughes' retirement and replacement. I would like to encourage the City Council to take a broad, public approach to hiring the new city manager, with a wide - ranging pool of prospects considered. I believe the process should be open to the public and carried out with the utmost. transparency. I would hope this opportunity to find an experienced person with the vision to work with residents to take the city forward will be wisely used. Thank you. Laura Nisi 5201 Blake Road Edina MN 55436 Inisi@mac.com i Susan Howl Subject: City Manager Selection Process RECEIVED MAR 16 7010 Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Housh, Swenson, Bennett, and Brindle, I am writing to commend Gordon Hughes for 11 years of service as our City Manager and a total of 36 years of public service to the City of Edina. His retirement in July provides the City of Edina with a tremendous opportunity in filling this critical position. I am writing to advocate a process to find a replacement by conducting a broad and thorough search that includes citizen input. Forming a search committee, hiring an outside search firm to create a broad pool of applicants from which to select, having an open public process whereby the search committee informs the City Council during its meetings about the progress of its search, and taking adequate time for the process are some ways to ensure that the optimal replacement is hired. Thank you for your time and attention. I appreciate your continued hard work on behalf of the citizens of Edina. Warmly, Cheryl Hirata -Dulas 4609 Bruce Avenue 925 - 925 -2429 Susan Howl RECEIVED Subject: Recommendation for City Manager Search Process MAR 161010 Dear Edina City Council, I am writing to strongly encourage you to engage in a thorough search for the next city manager. My criteria for a thorough search would include: 1) Creation of a search committee inclusive of Edina residents convened in a way to provide an open public process informing the Council and public alike by presenting updates at Council meetings (where the City Council records show the progress of the search committee) 2) Engagement of an executive search firm 3) Broad search for experienced candidates (the search process would include marketing of the open position nationwide) 4) Potential candidates should have demonstrated in their past City Manager experience a competency in running a cohesive administration, inclusive of residents in setting public policies, providing clear processes, and effectively communicating to residents of the city. Thank you for your consideration, Paige Paige Bingham 4626 Edgebrook Place Edina MN 55424 The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started. Susan Howl To City Council Re: Process to replace the City Manager RECEIVED MAR 16 2010 I am writing to ask City Council to conduct a broad and through search process to hire a new City Manger. Ms Worhtington should definitely be in pool of candidates the City considers, but she should not be the only candidate. Ms Worthington has already served as a City Manger in Falcon Heights, but that is a community with a population 1 /10th the size of Edina and an operating budget of just $11 million versus Edina's at $32 million (source 2008 State Auditor report). Edina is a larger city with larger issues around development and transportation. This is an issue of due diligence and the Council should hire a search firm, gather input from the community and make sure that the next City Manger is well equipped to lead the City into the future. am attaching info on Golden Valley's (population 20,000, operating budget $15 million) City Manager search for your reference. Sincerely, Kitty O'Dea III Council B e ins City A A� ■ ..� In June the City of Golden Valley embarked upon a search for a new city manager, and at its July 15 meeting, the City Council outlined the next steps of the recruit- ment process. The City retained Personnel Decisions International (PDI) to lead the search effort, which garnered 54 applications. PDI narrowed the field to seven semi - finalists for the City interview process. The City Council will meet in a workshop session to conduct one -hour interviews with the semi- finalists at 6 pm August 7 and at 5 pm August 12. The afternoon before the Council interviews, each candidate will have separate meetings with the City management team and with a team of line employees. Candidates will also have the option to take a tour of Golden Valley. PDI will assemble information from all of the initial interviews and give the candi- dates numbered identities. At a special 7 pm meeting Wednesday, August 14, the Council will discuss the candidates, reacting with their own impressions and those expressed by the staff, and select finalists. The next step is for PDI to conduct managementAeadership assessment and back- ground checks on the finalists. The goal is to have information on the finalists ready for the Council to make a decision by the week of September 17. Current City Manager Bill Joynes, who announced his retirement earlier this year, will stay on board until the new city manager is in place. For more information about the city manager search process, contact Assistant to the City Manager Jeanne Andre at 763 - 593 -8014. "*If' IN This ISSUE MARkET VALUE HoMESTEAd CREdIT 12 31 REdISTRiCTiNq ANd NEW PRECINCTS NEW RECyclinq TRUCks14 VIEWS Of ThE VAIIEy PHOTO CONTEST 16 5 I FOUNdATION GOLF TOURNAMENT 71 VIEWS Of TILE VAIIEy PHOTO CONTEST SUMMER SAFETy REVIEW IS 91 NEW Public SAFETy DIRECTOR NATIVE PIANTS 110 11 I SEAICOATINq RECEIVED KIMSERL" MO11TC- C-MERY MAR 161010 5300 EVANSOOD LANE EDI NA. MN 55436 952-S431-21 19 Dear Council members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Hovland and Swenson: I understand that Gordon Hughes has tendered his resignation as of July 2010. In the many conversations I have had about this position, the prevailing sentiment is that the city needs to take a new direction with its City Manager. Residents will be closely watching the process the City takes in hiring a new manager. The Council should consider using the Small Area Guide process as a model for hiring a City Manager. A team of residents and board/commission members should be chosen to determine what qualities /qualifications residents would like to see in a City Manager. Those meetings should be well publicized and invite widespread community participation. The qualities should also be used to develop a set of metrics for future performance reviews for the Manager. Performance metrics and review dates should be scheduled and made public. Once determined, the qualifications /qualities should be communicated to an outside search firm. The search firm should interview the broadest range of candidates possible. Without this transparent and thorough process, residents will not have confidence in the City's choice of City Manager. Sincer y, Kim Montgo Email: kmschoolmail @aol.com Susan Howl Dear Edina City Council, I am an Edina student and the search for a new City Manager has recently come to my attention. As a resident who will be directly affected by this role, I would like a search committee formed and an outside search firm hired to create a broad pool of applicants to choose from. I also favor an open public process whereby the search committee informs the Council during its meetings about the progress of their search. I also think it is important to select an external candidate that has proven history at other cities to foster democratic, open, and inclusive public processes and policies, and a service- oriented and resident - friendly staff culture. Thank you very much for your time. Sincerely, Katie Arneson RECEIVED MAR 161010 Susan Howl RECEIVED Dear Council Members Housh, Bennett, Swenson, and Brindle, and Mayor Hovland: MAR 16 1010 Upon learning of the future retirement of City Manager Gordon Hughes, I want to express my concern for the process you take in selecting his replacement. I urge you to make the search open, thorough and deliberate. Please look at best practices for filling such a public service position and include ample opportunities for resident input. Thank you for giving your most careful thought to developing and executing this process. Sincerely, Carol Frisch 7025 Comanche Court Edina, MN 55439 Susan Howl Dear City Council Members: RECEIVED MAR 161010 It is with great fervor that we are writing to you to indicate our concern and care for the selection of our new city manager position. We have had our areas of frustration and dissatisfaction these last few years, particularly since we have been long time residents in the Country Club! We believe that it is imperative that you conduct a search that will provide citizen input and transparency. Since the position is so significant, we encourage you to seek someone with a broad range (even outside of our community)and will be someone who does care about the community he or she represents with a value placed on history, quality of education it provides and sense of neighborhood. We do have a special place to live here in all of Edina and we also know that the City Manager can influence that uniqueness either negatively or positively. The reason we are resorting to a mail is because we are out of town and cannot attend Tuesday's meeting. However, we hope this does not reflect our disinterest and would indeed be there if possible. We shall be watching with interest the process that you utilize in selecting our next City Manager. Thank you for your willingness to respect our concern! JoAnne Farley, 4615 Bruce Ave. (25 years, in residence) Ginny and Gordy Spartz, 4603 Bruce Ave. (42 years (today!) in residence. Thank You again! I Susan Howl .jbject: City Manager position Dear City Council members: RECEIVED MAR 161010 I encourage you to conduct a regional or national search for the position of City Manager. We have had a long tradition in Edina of excellence in our City Manager and I believe you should engage an outside search firm to develop a list of qualified persons. We owe it to ourselves to form a public, transparent, search committee that includes citizen input and creates a broad pool of candidates for this position. As a premier community, that keeps it managers for long periods of time, we deserve an exhaustive process to make certain the new manager has citizen support and is the right person for this important position. Regards, Sandra Fox Minutes of the Edina Park Board January 12, 2010 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Kenney, Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Bill Lough, Rob Presthus, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Ben Pobuda MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeff Sorem STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Todd Anderson, Tom Shirley I. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 13, 2009 PARK BOARD MINUTES Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 13, 2009 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Randy Meyer SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of Audubon Certification Awarded to Fred Richards Golf Course and Audubon Re- Certification Awarded to Braemar Golf Course - Karen Schragg, Manager of the City of Richfield's Woodlake Nature Center, gave a power point presentation regarding the Audubon Certification Awarded to the Fred Richards Golf Course as well as the Re- Certification awarded to Braemar Golf Course. Ms. Schragg explained the program and thanked Bob Atol for asking her to get involved and to help do the certification of the Fred Richards Golf Course. Mr. Schragg congratulated the City of Edina because they met the goals and thanked everyone who helped with it. She then presented an Audubon Print to Todd Anderson, on behalf of the Richards Golf Course. B. Amendment to City Code 1230.07 — Farmers Market at Centennial Lakes Park — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the cities of Edina, Richfield and Bloomington collectively applied for and were recently awarded a grant to promote the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), which is a health reform initiative of the Minnesota Department of Health. Sue Schardin of SHIP gave a power point presentation on SHIP and explained how it relates to the grant program. She also pointed out the City Council did see the same presentation at their October City Council meeting. Tom Shirley, Manager of Centennial Lakes, informed the Park Board that they almost started a farmers market a few years ago but due to the city ordinance Centennial Lakes could not be a location for one. Mr. Shirley informed the Park Board that the timing is now right for a farmers market and commented that during the last several months he has talked to potential vendors and people in the community. He noted that he has learned a lot about farmers markets in the last few months and is still learning. He explained that currently they are proposing to hold a farmers market each Thursday from 3 pm to 7 pm starting July 1" and ending September 30`h. This ends up being 14 farmer market dates. Mr. Shirley explained that this farmers market would be a "producers market" which means that all of the produce is sold by the seller with the exception of a few unique items. He indicated that eventually they would like to have 60 to 70 booths but he would like to start out this summer with 25 booths. He noted that the booths would be set up along the walkway from the Centrum Building north to Parklawn and south to 76`h Street. They would split it 12 booths to the north and 13 booths to the south. He added that there are 250 booths at the "Fall into the Arts" festival. He pointed out that he is considering charging $20.00 per booth per day or get a discount and pay $250.00 for the season. Mr. Shirley commented that initially they thought their expenses would be around $7,000 so it's not a big money maker but more of an event. Mr. Keprios asked about the $1,000 sponsorship to which Mr. Shirley replied that they are hoping to find someone to sponsor the farmers markets where they would distribute literature and things like that. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they will be sensitive to the local grocers as far as what products are offered at the local farmers market. He noted that it has been shown that on the days of the farmers markets the local grocers' business goes up. He noted that they will be very watchful and will learn as they go and adjust as needed to best serve the farmers market vendors, customers and local grocers and stated that we will make an effort to make it a win, win for everyone. Mr. Keprios stated that in order to go forward they need Park Board's approval and recommendation of the concept of having a farmers market at Centennial Lakes which also requires an amendment of the city ordinance to permit the sale of produce in a park. Mr. Meyer asked what does SHIP pay for to which Mr. Shirley replied they will pay for advertising, signage, brochures, etc. He noted that he is hoping that the booth fees and sponsorship fee will cover Centennial Lake's miscellaneous expenses such as trash pick -up. Mr. Shirley indicated that the vendors supply their own booths and take care of their own set up and take down, and are called on to be totally self sufficient. Mr. Lough asked if any other locations were considered and asked how they arrived at Centennial Lakes. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that years back they had a vegetable stand at the Aquatic Center in the parking lot and the City's revenues collected were to support the Art Center. However, when it became too disruptive with parking they moved it to Utley Park as a pilot project. A resident challenged the vegetable stand because it was in violation of city ordinance. City Code does allow for sale of produce on private property which is why there is one at Southdale in their parking lot. Mr. Keprios stated that they also considered having it in the parking lot at Braemar; however, they have adequate parking and easy access to several businesses at Centennial Lakes. He pointed out that the "Fall into the Arts" festival has always worked out well. In addition, there is a lot of subsidized housing in the area, frequently used trails and is in a highly visible area. These are all of the reasons 2 for his rationale to have a farmers market at Centennial Lakes. However, he is always open to other suggestions. Mr. Pobuda asked if any other days were looked at besides Thursdays. Mr. Shirley replied that they did look at other days but Thursdays seemed to make the most sense. The closest farmers market to Edina on a Thursday is in Maple Grove. He added that there is a lot of competition for vendors on Saturdays. Mr. Shirley commented that if all goes well they may consider another day as well but they want to stay away from weekends. One other thing is they have "Movies in the Park" at Centennial Lakes on Thursday nights so that could also be a plus to having it on Thursdays. Mr. Fronek asked Mr. Shirley if he has talked to the businesses and retail shops in the area about the farmers market. Mr. Shirley replied that they briefly discussed it with the management in the plaza area to which he has not yet heard back from Byerly's. Mr. Shirley noted that Centennial Lakes does have the rights to the parking lot but they do want to be sensitive to the businesses and noon is typically the busiest time so they won't start the farmers market until 3:00 pm. He noted that he does not think there will be an issue. Ms. Kenney asked what the rationale is for only starting with 25 vendors when you have the room for a lot more. Mr. Shirley replied they want to start small and not get in over their heads; they would like to ease into it. He indicated there is a lot of work involved and noted that they need to make sure everything is local and home grown. He added that they do hope to eventually add more booths. Ms. Steel asked how many bike racks are at Centennial Lakes to which Mr. Shirley replied they have one set of bike racks which are currently located on the north edge as you enter the promenade. Ms. Steel strongly suggested that they look at putting in more bike racks. Mr. Meyer asked who will be responsible for inspecting these farms to which Mr. Shirley replied that he will be. He noted that the City Horticulturist, Tim Zimmerman, will be checking on the farms located in the northern suburbs because he lives in that area and that is where most of the farms are located. Mr. Peterson commented that Tom Shirley looks like he would be a good candidate to be President of the Twin Cities Farmers Market Municipal League. He stated that they really don't need to reinvent the wheel when so many municipalities already have fanners markets. He noted that they should all get together a couple of times a year to give and receive input from each other. Mr. Shirley commented that he has met with people from other municipalities and they have been very willing to share their information. They have given him some great ideas as well as told him different things to avoid. Mr. Peterson commented that he and his wife like to go to the farmers market at Mill City by the Guthrie and indicated that they also have food to eat at the site and asked Mr. Shirley if they would be providing food. Mr. Shirley replied that they are looking into it however, that brings the Health Department into it a little more. Mr. Peterson 3 commented that at Mill City they also have arts and crafts and asked if they would have those as well. Mr. Shirley responded that farmers markets are really split 50/50 some allow them and others are strictly for produce. He noted that he thinks initially they will stay away from arts and crafts especially because of the "Fall into the Arts Festival ". He added that they may have flowers. Mr. Meyer asked about the process for approving the city ordinance will it just allow one at Centennial Lakes or can there be one anywhere in the city. Mr. Keprios replied that right now he would like to see it limited to Centennial Lakes only. Mr. Meyer asked if the issues around signage have been considered, discussed and evaluated. Mr. Keprios replied that there is a sign ordinance in place that they will have to abide by. Mr. Meyer asked how it will be done to which Mr. Keprios responded that he thinks they will approach it like the "Fall into the Arts" festival. They will put them up in local areas so that people will know about it ahead of time. Mr. Lough commented that in terms of sequencing it is recommended that the Park Board recommend that the City Council approve the concept of the farmers market at Centennial Lakes and to amend the city ordinance. Mr. Lough asked Mr. Keprios if the city ordinance needs to be changed now before some additional planning and scoping work can be done. Could the Park Board just recommend the concept to the City Council at this time or is it necessary to do both of them now to prove they are serious. Mr. Keprios replied that he feels they go hand in hand and asked Mr. Lough if he has a hesitation with changing the city ordinance. Mr. Lough replied no, but his thought is what if they change the city ordinance and they don't approve the final concept down the road the city ordinance still remains changed and that's his question. Mr. Keprios stated that it goes hand in hand and explained that the City Council can actually waive second reading on a change of ordinance. He indicated that the Park Board can approve everything in February unless they would like more information at the February Park Board meeting. Jerry, Lakeville resident, indicated that several families rent land from him to grow produce to bring to farmers markets. He noted that he runs a couple of farmers markets himself and that they would be very interested in having a booth at the farmers market at Centennial Lakes. He pointed out that someone could inspect 10 different families easily in an hour on his land. He noted that they also have several acres of flowers so everything is fresh off the farm. Joseph Hulbert MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT OF THE FARMERS MARKET AND NEW ORDINANCE AS PROPOSED BY STAFF. Rob Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. Veteran's Memorial Proposal - Utley Park - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that this is a concept they have talked about for several years. He noted that currently there are a few plaques within Edina's parks that honor veterans. However, there is no designated park or large memorial to honor all those who have served in our Armed Forces. 4 Mr. Keprios gave a power point presentation to the Park Board showing veterans memorials in surrounding community parks. He noted that it seemed to make the most sense to him to put one in Edina at Utley Park. He commented that Utley Park has a big grassy area right next to the Greg Rice Shelter Memorial. He noted that at this site they would not have to remove any trees. In addition, its location is right along the Fourth of July parade route which always includes our honored veterans. Also, there is a flag pole with a plaque that reads: "American Legion Flagpole — Dedicated to the men and women who honorably served their country in times of war and peace. Edina Post #471. May 30, 1955 ". Therefore, it seemed to make the most sense to focus on this area however, there are other sites that could be looked at if the Park Board feels there may be a better location. Mr. Keprios indicated that it's staff's recommendation to spend Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) dollars to hire professional architect/engineer services to assist a committee. He pointed out this would not take away dollars from any other project. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he would ask the Park Board to also approve the process as recommended by staff which would include forming an 11 member Veterans Memorial Committee appointed by the Park Board. This committee would be the one to come up with recommended designs and concepts to be approved by the Park Board and City Council. He noted that the committee would also raise all of the funds to cover all of the construction costs. He noted that he would ask the Edina Foundation to be the "Charitable Giving Partner" for the fundraising efforts. The committee would also conduct whatever research may be needed. He noted that it would all be volunteer fundraising and not staff. Mr. Keprios suggested that they could also publicize it on the website and newspaper as well as print brochures and go on -site to solicit volunteers and donations. Mr. Keprios pointed out that staff would oversee the construction management. Mr. Presthus asked Mr. Keprios how much he thinks it will cost in the end to which Mr. Keprios replied it is way too premature to even guess what it would cost. He stated that it will depend on what the committee feels would be appropriate for the site as well as what the Park Board and City Council feel is appropriate. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that it was an Edina resident, Mike Goergen who came forward and triggered this and he is willing to step up and serve as chair of the committee. He noted that he appreciates Mr. Goergen's initiative, support and call to serve. Ms. Steel asked what if the dollars are approved for the architect/engineer and we don't receive enough through fundraising for the construction how can they protect themselves in the process? Mr. Keprios replied that if they invest money in the professional services and they fail to raise enough dollars through fundraising then they would go to a Plan B. He explained that if it becomes priority enough to fund through the CIP, it would have to compete with all of the other projects in need, but those are decisions for the Park Board and City Council when and if that time comes. 5 Ms. Kenney stated that it seems the hiring of architects /engineers out of the CIP may be a little premature given that they haven't even formed a committee to at least have a basic idea of what to design or what the budget might be. She noted that if the committee takes time to explore what the potential budget may be or what funds could potentially be raised but at least a concept of what the construction might look like; then maybe take money from the CIP to hire an architect to design a plan at that point. Mr. Keprios commented that if the Park Board favors the concept but doesn't want to commit the dollars for architect fees at this time that's okay but then maybe the committee can be charged with coming up with some of the initial funds for professional services and see where it goes. Mr. Keprios noted that he has come forward with this initial recommendation as a sign of the city's commitment to the project. However, if the Park Board feels they ought to go forward and that the money ought to be donated up front that could also be an option. Mr. Meyer stated that conceptually he thinks it's a great idea but if the city is currently looking at furloughs to city employees and now we are going to throw $30,000 at a concept that is in the early stages he's not sure know how best to deal with it at this time. He needs to think about the situation we are in but at the same time he is willing to be creative and let it develop a little further and then decide whether to appropriate funding at that point. Mr. Fronek stated that in September the Park Board approved $30,000 to be dedicated to the Community Garden Development and asked if they could laterally decide to put that money somewhere else. Mr. Keprios noted that he did not mean to imply we would never do a community garden, it is not an either or situation for the money. He stated that if this becomes a priority and it is what the Park Board wants the money to be used for; then maybe they should walk before they run and first raise the money through fundraising, donations, etc., and then go through the public process. Mr. Fronek indicated that in fairness to the public the Park Board has already agreed to put $30,000 into the community garden and to laterally decide to do something else he's not sure what the implications of that would be. He explained that it's not a reallocation, there is a pool of money that he believes can be drawn from that would not affect the community gardens, they would not eliminate projects they have already committed to doing. Mr. Keprios pointed out that this project has come to us after the fact and that it does not change or replace anything. This would be considered a new project that would be higher on the list. Mr. Fronek noted that he doesn't want to step over their bounds without further input from the public; he doesn't want the public to have the concern that the Park Board is inconsistent or a transient board if we decided to do something different than what we said at the September meeting. Mr. Keprios commented that he only suggested the dollars are there if this becomes a priority. He noted that if they want they can go through the public process and let the people be given the opportunity to express their views if that's what they want their capital dollars to be used on. Mr. Keprios stated that he appreciates the comments that we ought to walk before we run and maybe use fundraising money to begin with once they know what the scope of the project is 0 going to be and what money is needed for professional services before recommending CIP dollars. Mr. Fronek stated that in terms of budget and structure and back to Mr. Meyer's point with city furloughs, etc. is it correct that the CIP dollars don't affect any operational costs to the city. Mr. Keprios replied that is correct, those dollars can only be used for capital expenditures, it's a separate pool of money. Mr. Lough asked Mr. Keprios if the City Council can rearrange that pool of money from the CIP from time to time during the course of a budget period to take into account current economic situations. Mr. Keprios replied they do, in fact if anything they probably don't spend a lot of what is out there especially now during our tough economic times. They can move things around from time to time but it's not frequent and usually when something is set, it's set; however, this is something new that has come forward and there is currently no dollars for it in the operating budget. He noted that other than donations and/or grants, the funds within the CIP would be the only other available pool of money. Mr. Keprios commented that the City Council does have the authority to issue this money if they so choose. Mike Goergen, 6605 Kenny Place, informed the Park Board that several months ago he approached Mr. Keprios about the possibility of putting in a Veteran's Memorial at one of the City's parks and requested that the city consider this. He informed the Park Board that he is a Marine Corp Veteran and did serve in the Vietnam War. He stated that he feels they cannot do enough for their veterans and in particular those who gave their lives in the time of war. Mr. Goergen noted that he and Mr. Keprios have had many meetings to come up with the proposal that is now in front of the Park Board. He noted that he would be more than happy to chair the committee and that he will do whatever it takes through donations, fundraising, etc., to get the memorial established. He stated that he hopes the Park Board will at least endorse the concept of having a Veteran's Memorial at a city park. Mr. Fronek asked in order to start the project what would the approximate initial cost be. Mr. Goergen replied that the cost will depend on the concept of the committee as well as what is approved by the city, so right now it's a nebulous figure. He noted that the committee will have many functions, such as advertising, brochures, fundraising, civic groups, foundations, individuals, website, etc. In addition, the committee will also discuss and bring forth the components of this memorial from the statue to marble /granite to plaques, etc. At that point they will then have the architect run with his design of those elements and components that the committee would like included in the design of the memorial. Mr. Fronek pointed out that there are two components of having a Veteran's Memorial. The first component is the approval of the concept although it may be premature to say it will be at Utley Park, although it does seem to be the right place to put it. The second component is getting the dollars needed to kick start this project. 7 Mr. Presthus stated that he thinks this a great idea and is needed. However, he does think there needs to be more planning and information, he doesn't think they are quite there yet to be taking $30,000 from the CIP. Mr. Meyer indicated that he thinks this is a good concept but there is a lot more work that needs to be done. Ms. Kenney commented that she agrees with Mr. Presthus and Mr. Meyer and that it's a two part component. She noted that she wholeheartedly approves the concept of having a Veteran's Memorial in a city park. However, more work needs to be done by the committee before they can commit any money. Mr. Lough stated that he thinks for a city like Edina he is surprised that they have not entertained the idea of a memorial to honor the men and women who have gone in harms way or potentially in harms way to serve us. He commented that now that the idea is before us he thinks they should wholeheartedly support some sort of development of the concept whether it be through the formation of a committee to further flush out and put in some specifics and details into the concept that has been presented would be fine with him. However, he does think it's a little premature to commit dollars to it but we should be enthusiastic about moving forward with the concept because he certainly thinks these men and women deserve that honor. Ms. Steele noted that she agrees with everything that has been said. Mr. Peterson thanked Mr. Goergen for his hard work and dedication. He noted that looking ahead his only question is that the Fourth of July parade goes down an Edina street but the City seems to be moving in the direction of the Centennial Lakes area. He would like to see Centennial Lakes as a potential location for the Veteran's Memorial and added that it would also be a safer place for a parade. Mr. Pobuda stated that he thinks it's a great idea. Mr. Fronek indicated that he has a lot of the same sentiment as a lot of people; although he is in the camp to commit the dollars necessary so that the project doesn't fizzle out from the get go. Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT AS MADE BY STAFF AND COMMIT CIP DOLLARS AS DEEMED NECESSARY TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN. APPROVE PROPOSAL AS WRITTEN. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. FOR: Todd Fronek, Ben Pobuda, Dan Peterson AGAINST: Randy Meyer, Rob Presthus, Jennifer Kenney, Keeya Steel, Bill Lough MOTION FAILED Rob Presthus MOVED TO GO AHEAD WITH THE MAJORITY OF WHAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN BUT TO EXCLUDE THE $30,000 FROM THE CIP BUT TO ESSENTIALLY FORM A COMMITTEE TO START THE PROCESS AND THEN REAPPROACH LATER IN 2010 AFTER MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. Jennifer Kenney SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Fronek reiterated that the motion approved forming a committee and the concept of a Veteran's Memorial within a city park without CIP funding. Mr. Keprios asked for clarification that the motion doesn't say it has to be at Utley Park, but that they will explore all opportunities within Edina. Mr. Keprios stated that he will start to move forward and solicit members for the committee. The Park Board thanked Mr. Goergen for all of his work and efforts. D. 2010 Park Board Meeting Calendar — Mr. Keprios confirmed that the Park Board meetings are held the second Tuesday of the month in the Council Chambers. He noted that the only unknowns for 2010 are the meetings in August and September. It is unknown at this time when the primary election will be; otherwise the calendar is as it appears in the handout. Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2010 PARK BOARD MEETING CALENDAR. Rob Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. III. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. Outdoor Skating Rinks inks — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that with the cold weather they have had the opportunity to make outdoor ice. He noted that he is very proud of his staff for the great job they've done. He noted that as the Park Board recommended Countryside Park is not open this year. He also reminded the Park Board that the rinks will be closing on February 15`h regardless of the weather, which will result in some money savings. B. Centennial Lakes Winter Festival — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that on Sunday there was a winter festival at Centennial Lakes and that it was heavily attended. He noted that they had ice sculptures, face painters, exhibition hockey, etc. It was a wonderful event. IV. UPDATES FROM PARK BOARD A. Jeff Sorem — Mr. Fronek informed the Park Board that although Mr. Sorem was unable to attend tonight's Park Board meeting he would still like to thank him at this time for his last six years of service. He noted that there will be two new Park Board members at next month's Park Board meeting. B. 9 -Mile Creek Regional Trail — Mr. Lough asked what the current status is of the Nine -Mile Creek Regional Trail. Mr. Keprios replied he will be hosting a meeting tomorrow night. It will be the 2 "d Community Assessment Team Meeting of the E proposed 9 -Mile Creek Regional Trail. He pointed out that the Community Assessment Team is made up of residents from each of the segments where the trail may go. He noted that after the first meeting they set up site visits and walked each segment so that they can objectively determine all of the pros and cons. He commented that it is moving along. Mr. Keprios stated that ultimately he hopes that either at the March or April Park Board meeting staff will come forward with a recommendation based on information they have learned the last year through the Community Assessment Team, the Environmental Assessment Worksheet and Three Rivers Park District. He stated that once it is approved it will be passed on to the City Council where most likely they will conduct a public hearing on the matter. Meeting adjourned at 8:35 pm 10 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, February 9, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Chris Rofidal, Lou Blemaster, Arlene Forrest, Connie Fukuda, Jean Rehkamp Larson, and Joel Stegner MEMBERS ABSENT: Bob Kojetin, Bob Schwarzbauer, and Elizabeth Montgomery STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: January 12, 2010 Member Blemaster moved approval of the minutes from the January 12, 2010 meeting. Member Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificate of Appropriateness A. H -10 -02 4519 Arden Avenue, Edina, MN • New Detached Garage • New Front Entry Portico Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4500 block of Arden Avenue. The existing home, an American Colonial Revival, was constructed in 1942, and currently has a 2 -car detached garage constructed in 1964, that is accessed by a driveway on the north side of the property. The Certificate of Appropriateness request is two -fold; including a new detached 2 car garage, as well as a new front entry portico. Ms. Repya commended that the Board consider each request separately. DETACHED GARAGE: A 2 -story addition is proposed for the rear of the home for which a COA is not required. However, the addition will necessitate removing the existing 550 sq. ft. detached garage which is set approximately 20 feet from the rear lot line and 7 feet from the wall of the proposed addition. A new 484 sq. ft. detached garage is proposed to be set back three feet from the rear and side lot lines. The new 2 -stall detached garage is proposed to measure 22'x 22' feet in area. The design of the structure is proposed to compliment the American Colonial Revival style of the home with James Hardie lap siding, and an asphalt shingled roof to match the house. Attention to detail with windows and /or doors is demonstrated on all four elevations. HPB Minutes February 9, 2010 Ms. Repya observed that the initial plan presented (Plan "B ") demonstrated a building height at peak of 21'8 ", however, after meeting with the Planner and learning that the maximum height of the garage should be no taller than 10% higher than the average of the neighboring detached garages; it was determined that with a 24' garage to the north (approved by a COA in 2004), and a flat roof 11' garage to the south, the height of the proposed garage should not exceed 19.25'. Considering the need to lower the height of the garage, the pitch was reduced from a 12/12 pitch to a 9/12 pitch, lowering the peak height to 18' 11" (Plan "A "). A unique feature to the site, and an important element to considering when reviewing the proposed plan is the four foot change in grade from the front of the garage to the rear of the structure. Because the garage is set into the grade at the rear of the property, the height at the front of the garage is four feet taller than at the rear of the garage. Due to the grade change from the front to the back of the structure; one should also average the height of the building which would provide a 16'11" average height at peak for Plan "A" (the revised plan); and 19'8" average height for Plan "B ", which is the homeowner's preferred plan. Consultant Vogel reviewed both Plan "A" and "B" for the garage and opined that both plans meet the requirements of the District Plan of Treatment with respect to placement, size, proportions, massing, and architectural character. He added that he would recommend approval of the garage plan Planner Repya recommended approval of garage Plan "B" with an average height at peak of 19'8 ". Findings supporting the recommendation included: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the proposed garage. • The proposed garage is consistent with garages previously approved in the District. Comparative plans were provided demonstrating the different design elements required with height variations. The reduced height of Plan "A" causes the windows on the front and rear elevation to be scrunched into the peak of the gable; losing the molding and keystone above the windows. Conditions to the recommendation included: • Subject to the plans presented. • The condition that a year built (2010) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached garage. Jacqueline & Kevin Bidgood, 4519 Arden Avenue, owners of the property advised the Board that they would prefer the taller garage because the new garage at 484 square feet will be 66 square feet smaller than the one it is replacing, and the additional height will provide storage space they will lose on the garage floor. They added that they believe the taller garage looks better than the lower profile design. Member Rehkamp Larson agreed that it would not be fair to consider the adjacent flat roof garage in the height criteria, noting that in the future, a replacement for that garage 2 r HPB Minutes February 9, 2010 would most likely have a pitched roof. She added that the 19'8" height proposed with Plan "B" is consistent with the heights of garages previously approved by the HPB. Member Forrest appreciated the smaller footprint of the proposed garage and agreed that the need for more storage space is reasonable. Motion & Vote: Detached Garage Member Forrest moved approval of the new garage - Plan "B" with a 19'8 "height at peak, subject to the conditions outlined by Staff. Member Stegner seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. NEW FRONT ENTRY PORTICO: Continuing with the Certificate of Appropriateness request, Planner Repya explained that in addition to the detached garage, a new 68 square foot front entry portico is planned which requires a COA because it is a structural change to the street facing facade of the home. The design includes 12 inch square colonial style columns, crown and dental molding, and a flat roof surrounded by a 2 foot high wood railing. Pilasters consistent with the style of the portico columns are provided on either side of the entry door. The roof will project 58" from the wall of the home, and the concrete entry stoop will project 6 feet into the front yard. The overall size and proportion are in keeping with similar front entries found in the neighborhood. Ms. Repya explained that the homeowners have the original plans for the home dating back to 1940 which have influenced the design work undertaken for their home. When viewing the plans, it was discovered that a very similar front entry portico and brick cladding for the exterior walls had been planned; however when the home was built, the builder deviated from the plan deleting the portico, and using lap siding instead of brick. In a memo provided by Consultant Vogel, he reported that after reviewing the plans he believed that the new work would be compatible in size, scale, building material, and architectural character with the historic house. Furthermore, no significant historic architectural features will be removed or destroyed, and the new additions and exterior alterations should not impair the historic significance or integrity of nearby historic homes. Mr. Vogel also reported the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for rehabilitation clearly state facade alterations should be considered appropriate when new additions are kept to a minimum and designed to be compatible with the character of the historic building and the neighborhood. Porches in a variety of forms frequently occur on Colonial Revival style homes throughout the Country Club District, almost always as part of symmetrically balanced facades with centered, accentuated front entrances. Porches with flat roofs supported by columns, similar to the design of the proposed new porch at 4519 Arden, are also common nation -wide on suburban Colonial style homes built during the early 20th century. Mr. Vogel added that the proposed front portico meets the HPB Minutes February 9, 2010 relevant preservation standards for rehabilitation of historic homes, and recommended approval of the COA request. Planner Repya concurred with Mr. Vogel's observations and recommended approval of the plans for the front entry portico. Findings supporting the recommendation include: • The front entry portico will compliment the architectural style of the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent historic structures. • The original plans for the home were considered when designing the portico. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Plan of Treatment and Zoning Ordinance. Conditions associated with the approval recommendation include: • Subject to the plans presented. The homeowner's Kevin & Jacqueline Bidgood shared the original building plans with the Board. Board members were impressed that the original plans included a front entry portico and brick siding. Member Rehkamp Larson commented that she believed the 12" posts on the portico and 6" posts on the top railing are too chunky, adding that 10" to 8" posts for the portico and 4" posts on the top railing would be preferable. Referring to the original plans shared by the homeowner, Rehkamp Larson pointed out that the details were much finer and appeared more historic — concluding that getting the right balance is important. The applicant's architect, Terry Scholz commented that he believed that the narrower posts would be weak and not preferable. Member Rofidal commented that his first impression when viewing the plan was that it looked big when compared to the house. He further opined that the front elevation of the house appears flat and plain, as though something is missing. A new front entry portico will be a good addition. Member Forrest observed that the project will provide more substance to the home. Member Blemaster commented that she did not feel the Board should re- design a project. Motion & Vote: Front Entry Portico Member Stegner moved approval of the new front entry portico subject to the plans presented and the conditions outlined by Staff. Member Blemaster seconded the motion. Members Fukuda, Forrest, Blemaster, Stegner and Rofidal voted aye. Member Rehkamp Larson voted nay. The motion carried. III. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None HPB Minutes February 9, 2010 IV. LEGACY GRANT: Update - Tupa Park ADA Improvements Planner Repya reported that architects affiliated with Consultant Vogel's firm have inspected the existing handicapped ramping system that connects the Cahill School with the Grange Hall. There is a general opinion that the ramp, constructed at least 15 years ago is inefficient and detracts from the historic buildings, hence Consultant Vogel has directed the architects to look at alternative locations for handicapped accessibility to both buildings. Park Director John Keprios and Park Superintendent Vince Cockriel have been involved in the discussions and agree that a more efficient and appealing design is needed. Superintendent Cockriel has pointed out that the timing is perfect since the ramp is in need of maintenance. The City has provided the architects site information, and a plan is currently in the works Chair Rofidal asked who would be paying for the design. Ms. Repya explained that she understands that the architects are providing this plan to Consultant Vogel's firm as an example of their work. If down the road, the Legacy Grant is approved, the design work could be folded into the project. Ms. Repya added that Mr. Vogel will have more information at the next meeting. Board member thanked Ms. Repya for the report and agreed that they looked forward to seeing more information on this project. No formal action was taken. V. MORNINGSIDE BUNGALOW STUDY: Update Planner Repya reported that Consultant Vogel was to have provided an update to the Board, however due to his inability to attend the meeting, the update will be continued until the next meeting. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: A. 4602 Bruce Avenue — Minor change to a COA Planner Repya reminded the Board that on April 14, 2009 a Certificate of Appropriateness was approved at 4602 Bruce Avenue to construct a new home on the site. Andy Porter, the owner and builder has reported that a prospective buyer of the new home has asked for a wood burning fireplace. To accommodate the request, a chimney is required on the north side of the home that is shown to simply project from the roof. The only change required on the north elevation would be to separate two double hung windows to accommodate the fireplace. Mr. Porter provided plans that demonstrated the home as approved as well as with the proposed chimney. HPB Minutes February 9, 2010 The Board briefly discussed the proposed change all agreed that the change was very minor and did not interfere with the historic integrity of the home, nor would it have an impact on any of the surrounding properties. Member Rehkamp Larson moved approval of the request to add a chimney to the new home plan originally approved on April 14, 2009, subject to the plans provided to the Board. Member Stegner seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Changes to a Certificates of Appropriateness Board members discussed the fact that subtle changes to a plan, particularly for a new home are not uncommon. It has been suggested that an administrative approval by Planning staff and Consultant Vogel would be efficient from a time standpoint for both the property owner and the HPB, however, currently there is not a procedure set in place. Member Stegner observed that in order to provide consistent and fair regulations, language needs to be devised that provides direction for all. Board members agreed with Stegner and decided to come to the next meeting with ideas for criteria to establish how and when an administrative approval would be appropriate. Planner Repya agreed to research preservation commissions from other communities to see if any have administrative approval policies. No formal action was taken. VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Chair Rofidal made the following announcements: 1. March 10th Boards and Commissions Dinner 5:00 p.m. at Braemar Club House Invitations will be mailed shortly. 2. A call for Heritage Award Nominations has been sent to the Sun Current for publication. The deadline for nominations is Tuesday, April 6th with the HPB deciding on the winner at the April13th meeting. The City Council will make the award presentation at a meeting in May which is National Preservation Month. VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE: March 9, 2010 IX. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:10 PM Respectfully submitted, Joyce R.epya BPIH Bloomington Public Health Quarterly Report ■ For the City of Edina October — December 2009 i October — December 2009 D Wuaikfr � c tivities in Edina ■ The work of Public Health is defined by six areas of responsibility. This report utilizes the areas of public health responsibility to organize details of activities conducted in Edina. Activities in the following areas are described in this report: ■ Assure an adequate public health infrastructure ■ Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors ■ Assure the quality and accessibility to health services ■ Prevent the spread of infectious disease ■ Prepare for and respond to disasters and assist communities in recovery A special section highlighting the activities of SHIP (Statewide Health Improvement Program) has been added under "Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors." ■ ASSURE AN ADEQUATE PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE Provided Public Health Nursing experience for Bethel students. The students observed various Public Health activities and provided educational presentations at several community locations. They also completed two special projects: 1) a survey of child care providers about the health information they need and how they would like to receive it, and 2) a brochure about home safety. Information from the survey will be used for future planning. ■ Presented at the "Census 2010 and the Health Services Community" meeting on the impact of the Census on Public Health Services. The event was sponsored by Hennepin County Commissioner, Randy Johnson. Presented an overview of the services provided to Edina residents under the Local Public Health contract to the Edina Community Health Committee. Additionally, presented an overview of the public health emergency services provided including an update on H1N1. ■ PROMOTE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES AND HEALTHY BEHAVIORS ■ Conducted interviews and surveys with hotel/motel managers to assess underage drinking issues. Policy trends, gaps in prevention and severity of underage drinking will a V& BPH Quarterly Activities in Edina be determined. The information will be used to formulate an environmental strategy to prevent underage drinking. ■ Donated 29 copies of Joseph A. Califano's sought -after book, "How to Raise a Drug - Free Kid," to the Hennepin County library system. Before the donation, there were only five of the books in circulation and a waiting list for the book of 15 people. ■ Co- sponsored the annual, statewide Shutting Off the Tap to Teens and Young . Adults skill - building conference. The focus of the annual conference was on preventing underage drinking and alcohol use through policy work. Eighty -eight adults (six from Edina) and fifty -six youth (nine from Edina) attended. Grant funds made it possible to send several adults and youth to the conference this year. ■ Addressed the following topics at monthly Senior Clinics: October How to Keep Your Noggin Nimble — Strategies to keep mentally sharp November Fall Prevention — Personalized information to prevent falls December Review of Topics for the Year — Individual needs and concerns ■ Distributed and gave instruction for proper use of cars seats to over 30 parents. ■ Conducted the Community Readiness Survey to gather residents' opinions on the use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among young people. The views and opinions expressed in this survey will help plan effective strategies to benefit Edina's youth. The survey was mailed to 625 randomly selected Edina homes in mid- November. The Minnesota Institute of Public Health designed the survey and will compile the results. A Drug Free Communities grant from the Office of National Drug Control Policy provided funding for the survey. SHIP (STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) ■ Held the first LANA (Learning About Nutrition through Activities) workshop for preschool and childcare staff. The workshop assisted childcare and preschool staff to implement best practices in child feeding. Following best practices helps children develop life -long, healthy eating habits. Thirty-five childcare providers and preschool teachers attended representing 25 separate organizations. A key feature to the success of this workshop was a self - assessment completed prior to attending. The assessments were evaluated in advance so those attending could develop action plans. Many teachers are already following their plan and making a difference. One of the childcare teachers wrote back after attending the workshop, "I really would like to let you and all the people involved know what a great workshop (this was). What a wealth of great workable application(s) for preschool!!!!! I have already used two of the ideas from the manual, tied them into literacy, and the kids have loved it!" ■ Researched and developed a fact sheet on access to fruits and vegetables for the Edina Park Board. Zoning changes would need to be completed before a Farmers Market could be established in the City of Edina. ■ Presented an overview of the Statewide Health Improvement Program to the Edina City Council and to the Community Health Committee. BPH Quarterly Activities in Edina ■ Shared resources and information with the Bike Edina Task Force to support beginning stages of Safe Routes to School initiatives. ■ Met individually with 13 key school district leaders to inform them about SHIP. Also discussed their interest level, ideas and perceived barriers to developing wellness committees in the schools. ■ Presented information about the SHIP grant at the Superintendent's Advisory Council and the Elementary School Principals' meetings. Discussed the intent of starting wellness committees this year in two schools. Normandale French Immersion Elementary School volunteered to be one of the pilot schools. ■ ASSURE THE QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY TO HEALTH SERVICES Followed -up on 6 senior and vulnerable adult referrals. Referrals were for mental illness (1), dysfunctional relationships (1), dementia (1), unsanitary dwellings (1), chronic disease management (1) and a fall (1). Public Health Nurses conducted in -home assessments and arranged resources to help clients live safely and independently in their homes. In one case, an elderly woman needed help to prevent violent situations in her home. Police called for assistance from Public Health after a serious altercation took place in the woman's home. It was between her two daughters and involved a threat with a knife. Police were concerned because one of the daughters requested assistance from them instead of the woman. The nurse talked with the woman about acceptable and unacceptable arguments and when to call the Police. The nurse helped the woman with strategies and boundaries to prevent future violence and referred her to domestic violence counseling. ■ PREVENT THE SPREAD OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE ■ Initiated the practice of inquiring about illness, before making nurse home visits, to reduce the risk of spreading flu virus. Home visits were rescheduled in situations of illness. ■ PREPARE FOR AND RESPOND TO DISASTERS AND ASSIST COMMUNITIES IN RECOVERY The H1N1 Pandemic offered the opportunity to utilize our response plans and strengthen existing relationships. This unprecedented activity, although logistically complicated, was accomplished BPH Quarterly Activities in Edina quickly and efficiently. We distributed vaccine as soon as it became available. Over 5,500 vaccinations were administered to those who lived, worked or attended school in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. However, our clinics were open to all people in the target groups. ■ Established the Division Operations Center and utilized Incident Command Structure in response to H1N1. Weekly tactics meetings were conducted with Incident Command Staff, and action plans were developed and implemented. • Implemented H1N1 vaccination campaign. Gave 5,527 vaccinations to target groups identified by Minnesota Department of Health including First Responders. • Conducted three simultaneous H1N1 vaccination clinics in each city. Dispensed 1,926 vaccinations in fewer than 4 hours. • Vaccinated seniors for H1N1 and seasonal flu at Public Health Nurse Clinics, Community Centers and residences. • Vaccinated childcare providers, new mothers and young children for H1N1 at nurse visits to daycare centers and in homes. • Activated CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) members to assist in the H1N1 response. CERT members aided in patient flow, interpretation and greeting at the mass vaccination sites. • Distributed nearly 14,000 N95 respirators and surgical masks to clinics and First Responders. These were from the Strategic National Stockpile and were intended to be used once private supplies were depleted. • Conducted N95 Fit Testing Train the Trainer sessions for clinics. • Established a process to dispense Tamiflu if needed. Received a cache of the medication to be used for uninsured and underserved individuals with H1N1. • Held two large H1N1 vaccination clinics in Edina Schools. These clinics were open to those who lived, worked or attended school in the City. • Held training for Community Emergency Response Team members. One Edina resident completed and graduated from the training. 4 D p ' _U_ B� ua e 1 umbers Report for Edina ■ 2009 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES These numbers are a count of people served each quarter. Some people receive the same service and are counted in more than one quarter. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ■ HEALTH PROMOTION Community health presentations # of adults 442 236 463 200 School educational presentations Sexual decision - making presentations #of students 220 200 0 0 ■ ADULT AND SENIOR SERVICES Senior health receives referrals from police, senior outreach, social services, environmental health and other community agencies for vulnerable adults and falls. Individual clients served # of clients 17 10 13 11 Public Health Nurse visits # of individual nursing visits 6 4 6 5 Service coordination # of calls and case conferences 28 17 17 20 Senior hearing screening # of participants 17 5 17 9 Senior Community Public Health Nurse Clinics # of clients 72 107 132 161 # of consultations 107 104 106 126 Health education presentations # ofparticipants 41 220 0 0 ■ FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES Maternal and Child Health PHN home - visiting # of families 40 40 24 34 # of clients 78 79 43 62 # of visits 127 157 110 150 Car seats # referrals 0 0 4 1 SHIELD # of children 27 21 11 17 Police reports reviewed for follow -up # offamilies 34 18 30 24 South Vista # of pregnant and/or parenting adolescents 1 2 1 1 Follow Along clients # of children enrolled 35 30 32 31 Child -care consultations # of centers / # of visits made 4/12 4/11 4/11 4/12 High -risk birth certificate referrals follow -up # of babies 47 41 31 43 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4. ■ CLINIC SERVICES Women, Infants and Children (WIC) # of clients(unduplicated) :210 191 : ' 204: 203 .Health Risk Assessment Clinic # of clients j 5. 4: 1 4 . - : 2` .Sage Screening Program # of clients 15 20 15. 16 SagePlus Cardiovascular Screening # of clients ;; 0 ; 12 7 T Immunization Clinic # of adult clients 2 `0. 2 4 # of immunizations 2 0`. 3 ; 4 Immunization Clinic # of children . = 3 -:3 7 4 # of immunizations 8 6 _22 : ; -.8 Flu shots - seasonal #ofclients 0 0' 816.... -315. Flu shots - M N1 # of immunizations NA -',:NA NA : 1464 Head Start early childhood screenings # of children screened r ~ o- U do } 0 0' Intake calls & drop -in visits # of contacts 30 20 28 82 Perinatal Hepatitis B # 6fclients 1 0 3 1' 0 Reportable disease follow -up / consultations # of contacts 58 29' 24" ' ' '29