Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-06-15_COUNCIL MEETINGr AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL June 15, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of June 1, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Regular Meeting of June 1, 2010 and Work Session of June 1, 2010 II. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. Insurance Renewals —Continued to July 6, 2010: 1. Workers Compensation 2. General Liability 3. Property * B. Self- Contained Breathing Apparatus — Edina Fire Department * C. 2010 -2011 Ice Control Purchase * D. Contract ENG 10 -10 - Oaklawn Avenue Storm Sewer Improvements E. Shelving — New Public Works Facility Agenda/Edina City Council June 15, 2010 Page 2 III. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Second Reading — Ordinance No. 2010 -13 — An Ordinance Amending Edina City Code Concerning Intoxicating Liquor Licenses (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) B. Resolution No. 2010 -48 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) * C. Resolution No. 2010 -49 Appointing Primary Election Judges * D. Resolution No. 2010 -50 Accepting Historical Society Grant On Behalf of the Heritage Preservation Board E. Traffic Safety Report of June 2, 2010 * F. Resolution No. 2010 -51 Accepting Grant On Behalf of Edina Fire Department IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment, " the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. V. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated June 3, 2010, TOTAL $1,276,686.24; and Pre -List dated June 10, 2010, TOTAL $860,764.90 and Credit Card Transactions from .4/27/10 — 5/25/10 TOTAL $7,107.35 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence VII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS • Agenda/Edina City Council June 15, 2010 Page 3 Tues Tues Wed Tues Sat Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues VIII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Jun 15 Work Session — Budget Forecast 5:00 P.M. Jun 15. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jun 16 Employee Recognition Luncheon 11:00 & 12:30 Jun 22 Study Session — City Manager Hiring - PDI 11:30 A.M. Jul 3 INDEPENDENCE DAY PARADE 10:00 A.M. Jul 5 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jul 6 Work Session — Jnt Mtng with EEC 5:00 P.M. Jul 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jul 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jul 27 Study Session — to be determined 7:00 A.M. Aug 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Aug 3 Filing Opens — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy Aug 10 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Aug 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Aug 17 Filing Closes — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy Aug 24 Study Session — to be determined 11:30 A.M. Sep 6 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sep 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Sep 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Sep 28 Study Session — to be determined 7:00 A.M. Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE COMMUNITY ROOM BEGINS AT CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CLERKS OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CLERKS OFFICE COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 1, 2010 7:04 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Bennett for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 18, 2010 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for May 18, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 41 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 1, 2010 7:06 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett approving the council consent agenda with the exceptions of Item III.B., award of bid, About Town paper purchase, and Item IV.H., Resolution No. 2010 -44 Revise Posted Speed Limit on West 66th Street from TH -100 to Valley View Road. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 18, 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF MAY 18, 2010 Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett approving the minutes of the regular meeting of May 18, 2010, and work session of May 18, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE 2010 -13 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Attorney Knutson stated if the proposed ordinance were approved, Edina Code would allow any restaurant establishments that offered bocce and bowling to sell intoxicating beverages. The Council discussed the matters to be considered with Mr. Knutson. Mr. Knutson stated the proposed ordinance amendment was prompted by the request of Cypress Equities for Pinstripes, a prospective tenant. He explained that establishments with wine and beer licenses currently were allowed bowling centers. Mr. Knutson added Pinstripes would need to file the necessary application for an intoxicating liquor license if Council decided to amend the code and allow restaurants with bocce and bowling to obtain intoxicating on -sale licenses. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Public Testimony Kirk Williams, representing Cypress Equities and Pinstripes, addressed the Council. Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Lane, addressed the Council. Dana Lappin, 205 Coventry Court, addressed the Council and submitted a petition. Diane Anselmo- Lacey, 7400 Edinborough Way, addressed the Council and submitted a letter from Jan and George Geffen of 7400 Edinborough Way, Unit 5105. Frank Durocher, 7400 Edinborough Way, Unit 5206, addressed the Council and submitted a letter signed by 20 residents. Daniel Wise, 7400 Edinborough Way, Unit 5307, addressed the Council. The Council asked Mr. Wise what he could hear from the park during daytime hours. Mr. Wise responded there was not much noise, sometimes he could hear music, and there was rarely noise from the park after 11 p.m. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 1, 2010 John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, addressed the Council. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Dale Schwartz, Pinstripes CEO, Chicago, Illinois, addressed the Council. The Council discussed the concern expressed regarding amplification of music and asked questions of Mr. Schwartz. Mr. Schwartz, described the types of sound generated by Pinstripes and assured the Council that based on decibel tests, there was no risk that music would be heard across the lake. He explained the outside corridors would be used as restaurant space to enjoy the stunning lake views, not for gaming, and agreed to enclose outdoor corridors with sliding glass windows to address residents' concerns. Mr. Schwartz stated Pinstripes had two Chicago locations and there had been no police incidents during three years of operations. He described their restaurant atmosphere and offering as being on par with Redstone or Dakota Restaurants, and indicated the speakers would be directed downward, creating a background music ambiance that would not interfere with conversations. The Council addressed the noise generated from bowling. Mr. Schwartz noted the bowling lanes would be located on the far side of the building, adjacent to the bar area and opposite the outdoor corridors. He indicated he was not concerned that bowling noise would deter patrons from enjoying a conversation at the bar or restaurant areas. Mr. Schwartz advised one of the Chicago Pinstripes was located 400 to 500 feet and the other 600 to 700 feet from a residential area. The Council noted that the proponent had not provided a decibel measurement on bowling or bocce, the activities that make Pinstripes unique. The Council noted that, if approved, Pinstripes would have a zero setback to the City's park where smoking was not allowed. Mr. Schwartz stated, categorically, there would be no smoking at Pinstripes. He also indicated that this project was fully financed and he was prepared to move forward with this project. Natalia Sourova, 7400 Edinborough Way, Unit 5397, addressed the Council. Arnold Bigbee, 7621 Edinborough Way, Unit 2110, addressed the Council. Harry Engelbrecht, 1012 Coventry Place, addressed the Council. Marlys Wiens, 7310 York Avenue S, Unit 105, addressed the Council. Richard Speers, 703 Coventry Lane, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the proposed ordinance amendment and asked questions of Fire Chief Scheerer regarding the similarly- designed outdoor fireplaces at Centennial Lakes that receive frequent use without complaint. The fireplace would have to be constructed to meet code requirements if it were approved. The Council and staff addressed the questions raised during the public hearing. Council asked questions of staff relative to the ability to place additional restrictions on the liquor license, the existing conditions that were placed on the property at the time the Planning approval had been granted, and /or whether there was a need for an ordinance of general application. Planning Director Teague advised that all permitted uses of MDD -3 to MDD -6 zoning districts were permitted at this location. With regard to smoking, Mr. Knutson advised the City could be more restrictive than State law. Page 2 N Minutes /Edina City Council /June 1. 2010 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2010 -13, amending Edina city code concerning intoxicating liquor licenses. The Council discussed the ordinance and petition elements and whether it too closely addressed the Pinstripe business. Attorney Knutson explained the ordinance would allow a liquor license to be issued to establishments having bowling and bocce, and the language assured any such establishment would be a restaurant. Mr. Teague advised that a bowling alley would be a permitted use, and the only issue with Pinstripes was the liquor license. It was noted the language restricted all types of outdoor game activities and the liquor license defined that the outdoor lawn bowling or bocce areas could not be part of the defined outdoor premises. Council consensus was reached to revise the language to restrict games on covered decks, balconies or patios. The Council agreed with the need to balance the rights and responsibilities that flow between City businesses and residences. It was pointed out that final approval of Centennial Lakes had imposed 16 conditions, one which precluded outdoor amplification so the onus was on the proponent to persuade the Council that a certain level of modification to that condition was appropriate. Member Bennett offered an amendment to the motion to preclude all outdoor activity after 11 p.m. at restaurants with bowling centers or bocce gaming. The Council discussed the impact of restricting all outdoor activity after 11 p.m., noting patrons would have to be asked to vacate the balcony after 11 p.m. Attorney Knutson advised this would apply to all restaurants that had bowling or bocce as a general application. Members Brindle and Housh declined the amendment to the motion on the floor. The amendment failed for lack of a second. Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — 2010 PARKING LOT AND PATHWAY IMPROVEMENT — PK 10 -2PK Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for 2010 parking lot and pathway improvements, 10 -2PK to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways at $384,466.05. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. AWARD OF BID — ABOUT TOWN PAPER PURCHASE The Council requested staff provide cost estimates for conducting a community survey, possibly via utility billing, regarding readership and information residents were seeking to determine effectiveness of message delivery. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, awarding the bid for cover- and text - weight paper for four issues of About Town to the recommended low bidder, XPEDX at $30,952.77. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — WOOD CHIPPER — EDINA PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for 2010 Vermeer Brush Chipper, Park Maintenance Department to the recommended low bidder, Vermeer Sales & Service at $20,449.83. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — RENEWAL OF MICROSOFT LICENSE AGREEMENT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for 2010 Microsoft Enterprise agreement renewal to the recommended low bidder, Software House International at $40,210.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 1, 2010 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE PROJECT UPDATE Scott Thiss, 4518 Drexel Avenue, Edina Country Club President, provided an update on golf course projects and membership. The City Council addressed parking for construction workers and delivery vehicles and thanked Mr. Thiss for his report. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -12 ADOPTED — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING DOMESTIC PARTNERS The Council requested that staff make two minor grammatical corrections. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to adopt Ordinance No. 2010 -12, amending the Edina city code concerning domestic partners. The Council discussed its support of the ordinance amendment and noted that Edina was the first Minneapolis /St. Paul suburb to consider such an ordinance that assured fundamental fairness for all of Edina's residents. The Council thanked the Human Rights and Relations Commission for its initiative. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -43 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -43 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ART CENTER BOARD APPOINTMENT CONFIRMED Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, confirming the appointment of Ruth Valgamae to a partial term on the Art Center Board expiring February 1, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. STUDENT BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESS The Council discussed the interview and appointment process for student board and commission members and agreed that the interview process was an important student experience and a one -year term limit would open the opportunity to more students. Council consensus was reached that Members Bennett and Brindle, in conjunction with School District staff, would interview student candidates and make a recommendation for the Council's consideration. In addition, Council Members may provide recommendations to the interview board. NEW WINE LICENSE APPROVED — TJ'S OF EDINA, 7100 AMUNDSON AVENUE The City Council discussed with staff the requirement for alcohol awareness training, noting the ordinance required 75% of employees to be trained within 60 days of opening in addition to annual training. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving a new on -sale wine license to PARS Food Service, Inc., dba as TJ's of Edina Restaurant for the period beginning June 1, 2010, and ending March 31, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -36 ADOPTED — LOT DIVISION APPROVED, 5500 AND 5504 HALIFAX LANE Motion by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett, to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -36, approving a Lot Division of 5500 and 5504 Halifax Lane. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -44 ADOPTED — POSTED SPEED LIMIT ON WEST 66TH STREET FROM TH -100 TO VALLEY VIEW ROAD REDUCED Mr. Houle answered questions of the Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 1, 2010 Council and explained that the action, as requested by residents, would lower the speed limit to 30 mph. The Council requested that staff make a minor revision to the second WHEREAS in the resolution. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -44, reducing the speed limit on West 66th Street between TH -100 and Valley View Road. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *OPEN HOUSE DATES ANNOUNCED — NINE MILE CREEK TRAIL Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett acknowledging Three Rivers Park District open house dates of June 22 and June 30, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT William Westerdahl, 5912 Walnut Drive, expressed concern with the Three Rivers Park District's proposed regional bike trail. Laurie Chapman, 6420 Aspen Road, expressed concern with the Three Rivers Park District's proposed regional bike trail. Robert Lubar, 6619 Londonderry Drive, expressed concern with the Three Rivers Park District's proposed regional bike trail. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 20, 2010, and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $319,528.20; Communications Fund $3,348.84; Working Capital Fund $7,998.02; Equipment Replacement Fund $21,422.16; Art Center Fund $1,440.82; Golf Dome Fund $7,664.01; Aquatic Center Fund $4,117.04; Golf Course Fund $156,946.18; Ice Arena Fund $15,027.07; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $7,083.16; Liquor Fund $217,054.28; Utility Fund $56,383.78; Storm Sewer Fund $925.92; Recycling Fund $37,724.00; PSTF Agency Fund $2,516.66; TOTAL $859,180.14 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 27, 2010, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $70,983.32; Communications Fund $2,745.53; Working Capital Fund $1,336,811.33; Equipment Replacement Fund $9,758.41; Art Center Fund $1,338.81; Golf Dome Fund $754.71; Aquatic Center Fund $24,773.71; Golf Course Fund $18,214.88; Ice Arena Fund $1,696.49; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $9,951.63; Liquor Fund $189,683.53; Utility Fund $38,909.05; Storm Sewer Fund $24,400.54; Recycling Fund $32.50; PSTF Agency Fund $7,329.26; TOTAL $1,737.383.79. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. SWIMMING POOL FLOW RIDER REQUEST FOR BIDS Following discussion, the Council requested a staff update at the next meeting on the swimming pool flow rider. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 15, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 1, 2010, meeting available. Page 5 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 1, 2010 4:30 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, City Planner; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Planning Commission Members present: Stephen Brown, Jeff Carpenter, Arlene Forrest, Julie Risser, Mike Schroeder, Kevin Staunton and Michael Fischer, Chair. Planning Commission Members absent: Floyd Grabiel and Kata Karwhen. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to allow the Planning Commission to inform the Council on their work updating the City's zoning ordinance. Chair Fischer explained the process followed during the Planning Commission's meetings. He stated that members of the public were allowed to have input into the discussion of the Commission at their monthly work sessions on the updates to the zoning code. Mr. Fischer reported each topic the Planning Commission has reviewed or will review. The topics include: building heights, which would be necessary to align the code with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Under the Development Review process the topics included: sketch plan review, role of the Transportation Commission in the development process, role of the Energy & Environment Commission in project reviews, role of Heritage Preservation Board in project reviews, public input and public hearings, small area planning and the list of conditions required by the City. The area of content changes included: possible development of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) code, sustainable design, driveway width, tree preservation lighting /noise, landscape requirements, impervious surfaces, wetland setbacks, parking regulations /proof of parking, pedestrian connectivity conditional use permit standards, sign plan /sign ordinance, front street setbacks, text amendments, maximum /minimum size for apartments, group homes, non - conforming uses, 60 -120 day rule, outdoor fireplaces, side -yard setbacks /attached garage setbacks, single -stall garages, home placement regulations, wind turbines, drive - through windows, and subdivision rules. Chair Fischer said the Commission was conceptually formulating the ideas which be brought to the City Council, plus public input will be sought, and then the necessary amendments will be drafted. The Council and Commission discussed several of the topics under review. Of special interest was the possible development of a Planned Unit Develop or PUD code. Council asked to be informed of the date and time of this discussion. Other topics discussed included sketch plan review, potential for hiring consultant to recodify, balance between protecting existing home and business owners while still encouraging development, need for Planning Commission by -laws, transparency and role of the Planning Commission, roles of the Transportation Commission, Energy & Environment Commission, Heritage Preservation Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals, building heights and areas for next engaging in the community -based planning process. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 15, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 /1 A ow e .f Bea AGENDA ITEM: II.A.1 -3. INSURANCE RENEWALS Z No packet data Z Oral presentation [_1 Information coming o (Le �` 0 1 B8 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No.: II. B. From: Marty Scheerer Fire Chief Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Self- Contained Breathing Apparatus — Edina Fire Department Description: Fire Department (43) Self- Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: October 8, 2009 December 31, 2010 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Clarey's Safety Equipment, Inc. 1. $ 200,563.00 2. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Clarey's Safety Equipment, Inc. $ $200,563.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This request for purchase is for (43) Scott Air -Pak 75 -4500 High Pressure Self- Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA's) along with air cylinders and facepieces. The SCBA's would be purchased from the Joint Powers Cooperative Agreement bid that was approved by the Edina City Council on 5 -4 -10. This purchased equipment would replace the 43 fire department SCBA's that will no longer be OSHA/DOT approved for use in 2012. The funding for this purchase would come from a Federal FireAct grant ($156,510.00) received by the Fire Department and with budgeted equipment replacement account funding from the CIP. Our research indicates this is a very good quality SCBA at a very competitive price and would recommend the approval to purchase. ,`ignature The Recommended Bid is within budget Fire Department Department k not within budget //� / )J09)VPalliV, Vnance Director rdon Hughey, Pity Manager owe �� 0 v .HIV REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No.: II. C. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: 2010 -2011 Ice Control Purchase Description: Cooperative salt purchase for the 2010 -2011 season Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA: State Contract NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Cargill Inc: Regular Road Salt 1. $57.95 per ton delivered (State Contract #443276) 1. Cargill Inc: Treated Road Salt 1. $73.79 per ton delivered (State Contract #443279) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Cargill Inc, Regular Salt J $ 57.59 per ton delivered Cargill Inc, Treated Salt $ 73.79 per ton delivered GENERAL INFORMATION: This is the annual purchase for road salt used for snow and ice control. The City purchases Salt from the State of Minnesota Contract and will purchase approximately 2000 tons of regular salt and 300 tons of treated salt for the winter season, depending on winter conditions. The treated salt is used during the very cold events. These costs are about 3% higher than the 2009 -2010 salt costs. Staff has been able to stockpile about half of our annual requirement from unused 2009 -2010 product, which will provide a reduction in overall ice control costs. This purchase is funded through the Public Works snow and ice control operating budget. Public Works Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget /1 ., phn Pallin, Finance Director < Gordon Hu44s, City Manager G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRPW\RFP - Supplies \Item Il. A. 2010 -2011 Ice Control Purchase.doc o e t-i REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No.: II. D. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Contract ENG 10 -10 Oaklawn Avenue Storm Sewer Improvements Description: Oaklawn Avenue Storm Sewer Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: June 9, 2010 August 8, 2010 . Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Minnesota Dirtworks, Inc. $ 91,911.00 2. Northdale Construction $ 98,384.53 3. Veit & Company, Inc. $ 98,915.60 4. G. L. Contracting $ 109,519.60 5. Dave Perkins Contracting $ 126,100.00 6. Penn Contracting $ 127,213.00 7. Minger Construction $ 128,543.85 8. Burschville Construction $ 150,585.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Minnesota Dirtworks, Inc. $91,911.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid is for the upgrade of the storm sewer from Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue. This project was a resident petitioned project and will upgrade the storm sewer to provide protection for the 100 year rainfall event. This project is in the Capital Improvement Plan under the Storm Sewer — Pipe and Grading Improvements (UT -10 -003). The engineer's estimate for the project is $120,000; the Storm Water Utility Fund will fund this improvement. Staff recommends awarding this bid to Minnesota Dirtworks, Inc. Public Works Signature Departmen The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget %J Jahn V�allin, Finance Director Gordon HugMs, City Manager G:\Engineering\ContractNumbers\2010\ENG 10 -10 Oaklawn Ave STS Improvements\ADMIN\MISC\ENG 10 -10 RFP.Doc o e n 0 lass REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II.E. From: Wayne D. Houle Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Shelving for new Public Works Facility Item Description: Shelves for new Public Works, Facility Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: N /A: State Contract N/A Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Mid America Business Systems 1. $63,799.86 (State Contract No. 442624) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Mid America Business Systems $63,799.86 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for shelving in the mezzanines and shops for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The shelving will be placed in the following areas: Equipment Operations, Electrical, Utility, Street, Concrete, Sign -shop, and PW Archive Room. This purchase is through the State of Minnesota Purchasing Program. Funding for these purchases will be from the respective equipment replacement budgets. Staff recommends awarding this project to Mid America Business Systems. Signature The Recommended Bid is K Public Works ent within budget not within budget �lq n W I ' ,Finance Director Gordon Hdgh66, City Manager G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\Public Buildings\PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard\Non- Contractual Agreements \Shelving\ltem II E Shelving For New Public Works Facility.Doc i< 6� ow L 0 v R)Illy ,aaa REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. A. GORDON HUGHES ® Action From: CITY MANAGER Discussion Information Date: JUNE 15, 2010 Subject: SECOND READING — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES ACTION REQUESTED: Second Reading INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: On June 1, 2010, the City Council granted first reading for the subject ordinance which permits the issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses to bowling centers. Based on comments received on June 1, the ordinance has been revised to include a new "paragraph D" which prohibits outdoor games. No other changes were made to the ordinance. On June 30, the Planning Commission will hear Cypress' request to amend past zoning conditions which prohibit amplification in connection with outdoor restaurants. If acted on, this issue will likely be heard by the Council on July 20. Y. ORDINANCE. NO. 2010- 13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING LIQUOR THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 900.09, Subdivision 5,:of the Edina City Code is hereby amended to provide as follows: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor: Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to i) any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3, POD -2 Subdistricts or the Mixed Development District as established by Section 850 of this Code; ii) any amusement or recreation establishment including amusement arcades, 19ewRag seRtefs, pool halls or establishments offering amusement devices which means: A. A machine which upon the insertion of a coin, slug or other token, or upon payment of a fee, operates, or may be operated, as a game, contest or other amusement. B. Miniature pool tables, bowling machines, shuffle boards, electric rifle or gun ranges, and machines patterned after baseball, basketball, hockey and similar games and like machines. C. Amusement devices designated for and used exclusively by children, such as, but not limited to, kiddie cars, - miniature airplane rides, mechanical horses, and other miniature mechanical devices In addition, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any establishment located in the PCD -2 Subdistrict which will contain more than 200 seats; provided, however, a premises in the PCD -2 Subdistrict holding a wine license issued by the. City which was in effect on December 31, 1998, and which contains more that 200 seats may be issued an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, but the licensed premises shall not be thereafter expanded.to include more seats than existed on. December 31, 1998. For purposes of the preceding sentence,,outdoor, seasonal dining areas shall not be included in the seat count provided that such outdoor seating comprises 20 percent or, less of the total . seating capacity of the licensed premises. f ct'to the following:.. `> A. Not more than 50% of the gross floor area of the licensed premises •- - - Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.' shall comprise bowling lanes or bocce ball courts. For purposes hereof, ORDINANCE. NO. 2010- 13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING LIQUOR THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 900.09, Subdivision 5,:of the Edina City Code is hereby amended to provide as follows: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor: Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to i) any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3, POD -2 Subdistricts or the Mixed Development District as established by Section 850 of this Code; ii) any amusement or recreation establishment including amusement arcades, 19ewRag seRtefs, pool halls or establishments offering amusement devices which means: A. A machine which upon the insertion of a coin, slug or other token, or upon payment of a fee, operates, or may be operated, as a game, contest or other amusement. B. Miniature pool tables, bowling machines, shuffle boards, electric rifle or gun ranges, and machines patterned after baseball, basketball, hockey and similar games and like machines. C. Amusement devices designated for and used exclusively by children, such as, but not limited to, kiddie cars, - miniature airplane rides, mechanical horses, and other miniature mechanical devices In addition, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any establishment located in the PCD -2 Subdistrict which will contain more than 200 seats; provided, however, a premises in the PCD -2 Subdistrict holding a wine license issued by the. City which was in effect on December 31, 1998, and which contains more that 200 seats may be issued an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, but the licensed premises shall not be thereafter expanded.to include more seats than existed on. December 31, 1998. For purposes of the preceding sentence,,outdoor, seasonal dining areas shall not be included in the seat count provided that such outdoor seating comprises 20 percent or, less of the total . seating capacity of the licensed premises. f ct'to the following:.. `> A. Not more than 50% of the gross floor area of the licensed premises •- - - Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.' shall comprise bowling lanes or bocce ball courts. For purposes hereof, each bowling lane shall be deemed to measure 650 square feet and each bocce ball lane shall be deemed to measure 900 square feet. B. Machines or amusement devices as defined by Section 220 of this Code shall not be permitted in the licensed premises. C. Bowling lanes and bocce courts and lanes shall be located indoors or on covered decks, balconies or patios enclosed by solid walls or closeable windows. All exterior windows and doors adjoining areas occupied by bowling lanes or bocce ball courts must remain closed between the hours of 10 PM and 9 AM. D. Outdoor games are prohibited. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Arnold Bigbee [mailto:arniebl@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 10:46 AM To: Susan Howl Subject: Photos to forward to the Mayor's secretary Susan, there are two photos I took last Sunday when my wife and I visited the Pinstripes restaurant location in suburban Chicago. I visited w /Mayor Hovland Tuesday evening and he is expecting these along with other information I will drop off at City Hall later today. I will send the photos in two separate a -mails coming to you next. Thank you. Arnie Subject: Fwd: photo showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area Begin forwarded message: From: arniebl < arniebl me.com> Date: June 8, 2010 2:22:24 PM CDT To: Bigbee Arnold <arniebl Ome.com> Subject: Fwd: photo showing windows in bowling area Begin forwarded message: From: arniebl <arniebl Qa me.com> Date: June 8, 2010 2:21:56 PM CDT To: Bigbee Arnold <arniebl (a rne.com> Subject: summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes - please forward to Mayor Jim, my wife and I visited the Pinstripes location in a suburban development on Higgins Rd. in South Barrington. The food and service were excellent. We dined outside and I noticed that the sound system had speakers attached to each large umbrella over the outdoor tables. We had no sound interference with our meal conversation. The bocce ball outdoor courts (about 30 feet from us) were being used but we noticed no noise from those courts. The bowling alleys were separated from the restaurant by a 10 - 12 foot wide opening that was able to be closed off w /sliding doors. There were many families in the facility eating and playing. The decor is "upscale" with lots of art on the walls and tile and hardwood flooring. There were many small dining areas, each w/8 -15 tables. There were also 4 -6 smaller rooms for groups of up to 15 for birthday parties and other gatherings. The ballroom seating up to 300 was on the second floor: We saw one fire pit which was not active during our visit. The facility did not have a "sports bar feel.or. sound nor did we see the clientele one would expect to see at a sports bar (i.e.,.groups of people cheering while watching sports contests on large screen tv's). We were favorably impressed with the operation as a family food and fun destination. I also need'to share that; although Pinstripes offered to compliment our meals, I declined that offer and paid for our meals. My wife and I believe that Pinstripes would be a.good neighbor in Centennial Lakes if other neighborhood concerns can be addressed. I have sent a few photographs to you via Susan and will leave menus and other material from Pinstripes at your office on Wed afternoon. Please call me if you have any questions I can answer. Arnie Susan Howl Subject: FW: Jl', 0 2 1M >Dear: Mayor James Hovland > Council Member Joni Bennett >Council Member Mary Brindle >Council Member Scot Housh >Council Member Ann Swenson >City Manager Gordon Hughes On behalf of the Pinstripes Team, I want to thank the Council Members and Mayor for their support last night in amending the ordinance to allow us to proceed with our exciting plans to join the Edina community. I genuinely appreciate all the time and efforts on your part in studying and reviewing the various issues, and we continue to look forward to working together with the City as we formalize our building plans and make preparations to open. Again, thank you, and I look forward as well to an enjoyable Grand Opening celebration at Pinstripes Edina sometime soon! Dale Schwartz Pinstripes, Inc. Cc: Kirk Williams Cary Teague Gordon Hughes Susan Howl Subject: FW: Liquor and Gaming at Centennial Lakes JUh 0 7 From: Ray DeMont [mailto:raydemont @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 1:46 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Liquor and Gaming at Centennial Lakes Dear Mayor and Council Members: You were very thorough in your discussions of the noise issue as it relates to Pinstripes at your meeting last week. If you are indeed able to enforce glass enclosures without sliding glass doors to open, you will no doubt control the issue of noise. But, make no mistake, a door left open will produce the sound of crashing bowling balls and pins in any bowling alley. The idea you can sit at the bar at Pinstripes and not hear this, is an insult to your intelligence. My concern, as I wrote to you in the past, is changing our Ordinance to allow Liquor and Gaming. Fine Dining Restaurants are done serving by 10 PM. The current trend to add gaming is to extend the hours for more opportunity to sell liquor, not food. Your Predecessors on the Council were smart enough to recognize the difference. A Restaurant will not meet the 60% requirement for food sales only, and, in fact, will become a Bar after 10 P.M. If this Council changes our Ordinance to allow Liquor and Gaming, particularly at Edina's Premier Park where you have also allowed building with zero setback from the park, I will submit this Council will forever be recognized as the group to destroy the concept of controlled liquor sales in Edina; and perhaps, even Centennial Lakes Park as we know it today. If you still believe in Liquor and Gaming, I beg you to open the discussion to the Residents' of the City at Large. They are open to Liquor with Fine Dining only, but you won't make many friends suggesting we should now allow Bars in Edina. Ray DeMont 7400 Edinborough Way #5308 Edina, MN 55435 952 - 941 -6896 The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy. 4REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE R� ^ jut 7 ?DID June 5, 2010 Edina City Council James Hovland, Mayor Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Scot Housh Arai Swenson City Manager Gordon Hughes City Planner Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Pinstripes "Bowling/Bocce/Bistro" on Centennial Lakes. I want to take the time to thank you for your decision on the Pinstripes first reading. I am sure that you hear input on these issues and there is never a follow -up thank you. I many times think it would be fun to be in the political arena until I go to these meeting and watch you patiently listen to points of view be repeated and have people be so serious over issues that don't make a hill of beans. I thank you for your patience. I think you will be happy with your decision. I walked around the lake last night and there was a full compliment of people dining at the Macaroni grill and not only could I not hear anything from across the lake but there was no noise when I got right in front of their patio. There also seemed to be a fireplace someplace burning, perhaps at the Centrum and it was a quite pleasant smell. Hardly a liability to the community. Aga' thank you. Wayn Carlson 523 entry Wayne L. Carlson. President waynecarlson a popp.net 7400 Metro Blvd #213 Edina. N innesota 55439 Phone 952-844-0500 Fax 952 - 544 -9075 Susan Howl Subject: FW:.attn. Mayor and City Council members Re: Pinstripes From: Richard Speers [ma i Ito: rspeers@comcast. net] RECEIVED Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:55 AM JUN, 1. 2oio To: Lynette Biunno Subject: attn. Mayor and City Council members Re: Pinstripes Mayor Hovland and Council Members - I am writing to follow up on the last Council meeting when I addressed the sound testing produced for the Pinstripes development at the north end of Centennial Lake.. I am not able to attend the next meeting but would like to make one or two points. First, I favor the Pinstripes proposal and the proposed chane forr liquor sales at bowling establishments -with conditions. I believe it is appropriate to put conditions on Pinstripes because the building is part of a "commercial zone" that directly abutts a "recreational zone " - Centennial Park. These zones may not coincide with a zoning map, but nevertheless represent 'a seam where two uses - sometimes conflicting -meet each other. If Pinstripes were further away from this seam, I would not suggest.conditions, but in this case I think it is appropriate to ask that sound be limited to the 65 Dba referred to in Pinstripes'. own study. If you look at Pinstripes' website, you see the potential for live music which could.possibly be louder than 65 Dba on certain occasions. So I'm suggesting that 65 be the limit for the spoken word, amplified music and live music when measured at the edge of the exterior balcony of the development. Thank you for your attention. Richard Speers 703 Coventry Lane 1 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Dianne Plunkett Latham < Dianne. Plunkett. Latham @Comcast.net> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 11:45 AM To: Kris Aaker; Jackie Hoogenakker; Arlene Forrest; Cary Teague; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter, Joyce Repya; Julie Risser; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer, Michael Schroeder; Nancy Nyrop Scherer, Stephen Brown Subject: FW: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace RECEIVED 6 -11 -10 JUN 1 1 2010 Dear City of Edina Planning Commissioners, Please take into consideration the following when you receive requests for restaurants with wood burning fireplaces. Dianne Plunkett Latham From: Dianne Plunkett Latham [mailto: Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:26 AM To: Ann Swenson (SwensonAnn1 @GMail.com); James B. Hovland (JHovland @ Kra useRollins.com); Joni Bennett (JoniBennettl2 @comcast.net); Mary Brindle (mbrindle @Comcast.net); Scot Housh (Scot.Housh @Willis.com) Subject: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace 5 -31 -10 Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has recently added a new step to the GreenStep Cities program, that of Local Air Quality. Due to the hazards of wood smoke to human health, to the global environment, and to our urban forest, the Air and Water Quality Working Group (AEWG) of the Energy and Environment Commission has been studying issues related to wood smoke. Although the AEWG report on wood smoke is not yet final, I am taking the opportunity to pass along some data on wood smoke, which AEWG member, Julie Mellum has provided. I am doing so because it is my understanding that at the June 1 City Council meeting, a local restaurant will be requesting having a two story wood burning fire place. I am writing to request that City Council disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. Gas inserts for indoor fireplaces and outdoor fire rings are safer and more environmentally sound then burning wood. Wood smoke: 1. Is hazardous to human health. 2. Is a major source of carbon dioxide and black carbon soot in our atmosphere. 3. Contributes to the spread of insect -borne tree disease, such as emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease. Human Health - Wood smoke emits fine particulates that contain many of the same deadly toxins that are in tobacco smoke and vehicle exhaust. They are comprised of formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, dioxins and other noxious and persistent organic pollutants that build up in our lungs, crops and water supply. Wood smoke is more concentrated than tobacco smoke, travels farther and remains chemically active in the body longer. Everyone is at risk from wood -smoke exposure. But children of all agesi'l, unborn children, the elderly, and anyone with asthma, allergies, or heart disease are in the highest -risk categories. The US Center for Disease Control states that wood smoke is a trigger for asthma attacks. Wood smoke is also implicated in cancers, reproductive birth defects and in sudden infant death syndrome. i21 A study found that people who burn wood or other "biofuels" for heat or cooking may have a heightened risk of emphysema and related lung conditions. Among non - smokers, exposure to biomass smoke was linked to a 2.5 -fold increase in the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Smokers exposed to biomass smoke, meanwhile, had a more than four -fold greater risk of COPD than non - smokers who did not burn biomass fuels at home. 131 Minnesota's antismoking ordinance allows people to go to bars and restaurants and avoid smoke, because tobacco smoke has a proven harmful effects. Yet residents have no choice but to breathe outdoor air that smells of wood smoke in most neighborhoods and in public spaces —at all times of day, in all seasons. It can even enter homes through windows, vents and cracks. E43 Wood smoke interferes with the right to use and enjoy one's own property. Black Carbon Soot - The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to set limits on black carbon, a/k/a "soot." Generated from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, black carbon is a solid particle that warms the atmosphere because its dark color absorbs heat -- both when it accumulates in the air, raising the air's temperature, and when it lands on snow and ice, accelerating melting. Black carbon also has profound effects on public health, causing hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year. [51 Forestry Issues - Gas fireplaces and gas fire rings reduce the number of trees that must be destroyed for fuel; trees help absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. The head of the United Nations Environment Program is pushing for measures to slash non - carbon dioxide greenhouse gas pollutants, including black carbon, "because they make up some 50 percent of toxic atmospheric emissions ". He stressed that "The world must deploy all available means to reduce this pollution and that no substance contributing to this pollution should be overlooked. ,, The movement of firewood contributes to the spread of tree pathogens. Emerald ash borer will soon be killing trees in Edina. According to a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) document, "America's neighborhoods are under attack. The emerald ash borer lives in firewood. Move firewood and you spread the destruction. "171 Reducing wood burning in Edina will reduce the use of firewood and thereby reduce the spread of emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease as well as any other pathogen that could be spread via firewood. In summary – Please disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. [11 Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http://www.sciencedailV.com/releases/2009/11/091106084243.htm. 2 "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. 3 New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: //bumingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?f—�11 &t =3497. "Facts about burning wood; Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. 5 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/ center /articles /2010 /los- angeles- times- 02 -22- 2010.html. 6 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org/apps/ news /story.asp ?NewsID = 31952 &Cr= unep &Crl). Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Dianne Plunkett Latham Member Air and Water Quality Working Group Edina Energy and Environment Commission NA, ow Le� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. B. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -48 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -48 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-48 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Edina Community Foundation $3,000.00 Edina Community Foundation $4,340.00 Jack Rice $100.00 Northmarq Real Estate Services $2,500.00 Edina Park Department: Cypress Equities $1,500.00 Dated: June 15, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Greer Garden Landscaping Arts Outreach Program & Garden Sale Event Art Center Juried Show Movies In The Park At Centennial Lakes Park James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 15, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of r� City Clerk ow e • �Ncoaroxw�ti9/ ieee REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. Ill. C. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Action Discussion Information Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -49 Appointing Primary Election Judges ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: Minnesota Election Law 20413.21 requires that the governing body of the municipality appoint election judges to administer the polling places at least 25 days before each election. Due to legislative changes the Primary Election will be held August 10, 2010 with Absentee Balloting opening June 25, 2010. In order for Absentee Judges to begin their work in a timely manner we must appoint them at this time. The attached Resolution 2010 -49 lists the persons intended to serve Election Judges and Absentee Judges in alphabetical order. We will be placing five to six persons in each polling location at the Primary, plus running an Absentee Ballot Board. In addition, we will train alternates to substitute in case others cannot serve. When assigning the judges to a precinct we will maintain the party balance in each precinct and on our absentee board as required by statutes. In addition, this year, Hennepin County will be acting on behalf of the City of Edina as a part of our Absentee Ballot Board so they are named in our appointing resolution. I also ask for the authority to replace or substitute judges as necessary before Election Day. Attachments: Resolution No. 2010 -49 i RESOLUTION NO 2010 -49 APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 10, 2010 PRIMARY WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Edina Primary Election Judges for the August 10, 2010 Primary Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Edina City Council also appoints other individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 2048.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the Edina Absentee Ballot Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Atte Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 15th day of June, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 15, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Katherine Aby Rita Acker David Alkire Carolyn Anderson Pat Andrus Lisa Batdorf Mary Becker Jason Berger Angela Berger Carol Bertelson Lisa Billingham Karen Blalock Jill Blooston Dodie Bock Juliet Boemer Mary Book Holly Borgen Earl Boven Katherine Bradbury ZoeAnne Brandberg Adele Brellenthin Mary Brindle Kathy Bronner James Burnett Harriet Busdicker Marilyn Bye Christine Campion John Cardle Sandra Carlson Steven Carlson John Carlson Carol Carmichiel Pauline Carroll Cathy Cella Jim Chucker Eileen Cooke Teddy Copley William Coyne Sharon Coyne Marian Cracraft Colleen Crew Byron Dale Judith Dale Gloria Danielson Dan Dauth Dean Davidson Jeanne Davis Amy Demarest Delpha DeZellar Patricia Dill Charlotte Domek PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES AUGUST 10, 2010 Sheila Duhn Sally Dunn William Ehrich Don Eidam Bob Fiedler Paul Fink Lisa Flint Ardelle Flor John Fossum Vi Frana Rebecca Frederick Ginny Frey Pam Gagnon Valerie Geurts Devorah Goldstein Carol Gottesman George Griffiths Eunice Groschen Muza Habeck Barbara Halloran Eugene Haman Mary Ann Hans Brian Hansen Judith Hansen Joan Hanson Mary Hartupee Buddy Hasnudeen Mary Jo Hasnudeen Sharon Hed Cheryl Heley Mary Henderson Janice Hidem Bethel Hoaglund William Holden Judy Hoppe Annette Horton Terri Hudoba Myra Hykes Delores Isaacson Daniel Jensen Kate Johnson Shirley Johnson Allen Johnson Mary Kachan Ann R Kapaun Dalia Katz Katie Kay Ann Keenan Leslie Kiedrowski Jessica Kingston Mavis Klefsaas Janet Kopp Martha Kouatli James Landberg Mary Landberg Mary Leak Patricia Leefeldt Bonnie Leer Carol Lilyholm Bob Lindsey Ellen Loewenberg Cynthia Loveland William Lucas Celeste Lucktenberg Barbara Maeder Linda Maetzold Connie Mase Barb McFarlane Rosemary McGlynn Frank McGoldrick Joy S McHenry Margaret McLellan Joan McMillan Carol Melichar Ruth Mell Jane Meller Karen Miller Nancy Miller Janet Moberg Louise Mollick Pat Montez Larry Motl Ron Naae Barbara Nazarian Armi Nelson Wallace Norlander Patti Olander Ordell O'Neill Norman Owens Mary Pate Darla Paulson Mildred Paulson Wain Pearce Jean Pearce Heather Petermann Edward Petersen Christian Petersen DeWayne Petersen John Peterson Betty Pollitt Linda Presthus Robert Reed t t Lois Robertson Judith Rodgers William Rodgers Robert Rohlf Mark Rustad Mary A. Ryan Duane Ryman Marilyn Sanchez Randy Sawatzky Connie Schramm Paul Schroeder Marilyn Sedoff Marion Selid Katherine Sewell Betty Sewell Lincoln Shea Julie Sheehy Michael Skelly Mary Skoy Joann Skumatz Susan Smith Ruth Smith Cathy Snyder Lori Snyder Gisele (Gigi) Stangler Lynne Stanley Vivian Steblay Lee Strang Philothea Sweet Andrea Tiggas Donna Tilsner James Tindall Spencer Turner Betty Ann Ulmer Robert Ulmer Janet Ulvin Mary Vanek Ray Voss Jini Washburn Jenny Weber Paul Wehrmeister Mary Jean Weigel Mike Welbaum Ardis Wexler Patricia Williams Loretta Wold Sara Wolff Kathryn Woxland Deborah Zierden 5 S' 0 REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. D. From: Joyce Repya Associate Planner ® F-1 11 Action Discussion Information Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -50 Accepting Minnesota Historical on behalf of the Heritage Preservation Board Society Grant ACTION REQUESTED: Enter into the attached Certified Local Government Agreement. The agreement outlines the federal requirements necessary for the implementation of the $5,000 grant for a thematic study to develop historic contexts relating to heritage resources associated with Edina women. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This comprehensive planning project will trace the contributions of individual women and groups of women to particular events and trends that shaped the important broad patterns in Edina history. The study will build on the findings of the Edina Historic Context Study (1999), which determined that heritage resources associated with women's history are under - represented in existing historic property inventories. Identified as an important project by the State Historic Preservation Office, the study will make substantial inroads toward implementing the goals and policies contained in the Heritage Preservation Chapter 6, of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. ATTACHMENTS: • A cover letter from the Minnesota Historical Society regarding the grant. • The Certified Local Government Agreement. This includes the documents that must be filled out in order to receive funds after the work has been completed. • A description of the project, which was used in the application for the grant. • Resolution Minnesota Historical Society May 4, 2010 Joyce Repya City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: F.Y. 2010 Certified Local Government Grant Agreements Federal Grant Number: 27- 10- 21930.008 Dear Ms. Repya: Enclosed please find a set of agreements for the city's Certified Local Government (CLG) grant in the amount of $5000 for a thematic study for heritage resources associated with Edina women approved on March-11, 2010. Enclosed are three blue - bound copies of your Certified Local Government Agreement. The Agreement outlines the federal requirements necessary for the implementation of the grant. Carefully review Attachment A that outlines your project in detail. Your Agreement also includes the U.S. Department of Interior Civil Rights Assurance Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters, Drug Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying (pages seven through nine). If the Agreement is acceptable, please have the three blue bound copies signed on pages six and. nine. These copies should be returned to the Grants Office. A fully executed copy will be returned to you for your files: Please note that a brief monthly report is due in the Grants Office by the 15th of each month for the duration of the project period (see Attachment A and 2010 CLG Grants Manual Appendix F). This, brief form should take no longer thi h a few minutes to complete each month. It greatly facilitates the tracking of the progress of the projects. Should you have any questions or concerns aboutthe award or the agreement, please do not hesitate to call me at 651- 259 -3458. Thank you. Sinnerely; Man y Skypala Grants Specialist enclosures Minnesota Historical Society, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 651- 259 -3000 • 888- 727 -8386 • www.mnhs.org MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT AGREEMENT ACCOUNT FISCAL YEAR OBJECT FEDERAL PROJECT DOLLAR AMOUNT NUMBER CODE NUMBER 00284 2010 5260 27 -10- 21930.008 $5000 HPF grant funds $5000 applicant match This Agreement is made by and between the Minnesota Historical Society hereinafter called the Society), and the City of Edina (hereinafter called the City), pursuant to authority granted by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Society has been allocated funds by the United States Department of the Interior for use by Certified Local Governments for qualifying historic preservation activities; and WHEREAS, the City has applied for and been granted Certified Local Government Status and has made application for Certified Local Government funds to be utilized in carrying out the project described in Attachment A of this Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of and in reliance upon the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto do covenant and agree, each for themselves and their respective successors and assigns, to carry out the project under the following provisions. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. The Project Time Period, Work Summary, Photograph Guidelines (where applicable), Consultations and Progress Reports, Final Products, Project Director's Report, Project Budget, and Reimbursement Schedule are described in the Project Description, Attachment A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The City agrees the project will be carried out as described in the Project Description, unless modified pursuant tb the provisions of Section V of this contract. C. The Society will reimburse the City for the budget costs identified as Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) federal dollars in the Project Description, following submittal of materials as described in Section III of this Agreement. Final products which do not conform to the terms and conditions of this Agreement or which do not meet the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards will not be reimbursed. 11. ASSURANCES A. The City assures that all work carried out on this project will conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983) and that the project personnel meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983) as stipulated in the Project Description. B. The City assures that this project will be administered and conducted in accordance with the following: 1. OMB Circular A -87 "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Government" and OMB Circular A -102 (revised) "Uniform Requirements for Assistance to State and Local Governments." 2. Department of the Interior regulations 43 CFR Part 12, Subpart C - "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments." a. In addition to the requirements of these regulations the City will allow a minimum of two weeks between the date bid solicitations are published and the date bidders must respond; and allow eighteen calendar days be- tween the date invitations are mailed to potential bidders and the date bidders must respond. 3. Public Law 101 -517, Title V, Section 511, states: When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal money, all grantees receiving Federal funds, including but not limited to State and local governments, shall clearly state (1) the percentage of the total costs of the program or project which will be financed with Federal money, (2) the dollar amount of Federal funds for the project or program, and (3) percentage and dollar amount of the total costs of the project or program that will be furnished by nongovernmental sources. 4. The "Single Audit Act of 1984." 5. Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) Grants Manual (previously known as National Register Programs Guideline NPS -49). C. The City acknowledges that this project is being supported, in part, with funds from the United States Department of the Interior. As a condition of receiving such funds, the City assures compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975. Page 2 The City also agrees as follows: In the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work hereunder, no contractor, material supplier or vendor shall, by reason of race, creed or color, discriminate against any person or persons who are citizens of the .United States, or resident aliens, who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. No contractor, material supplier or vendor shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in the preceding paragraph, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed or color. The violation of this section is a misdemeanor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. This Agreement may be canceled or terminated by the Society, and all money due, or to become due hereunder may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms of this section. D. The City will indemnify and save and hold the Society and the Department of the Interior harmless from any and all claims or causes of action arising from the performance of this project by the City. E. The City agrees to make repayment of grant funds to the Society if terms and conditions of this Agreement are not followed or costs claimed are subsequently disallowed. F. The City, in accordance with provisions of 18 USC 1913 regarding lobbying, assures that no part of grant budget will be used directly or indirectly or to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device intended or designed to influence in any manner a member of Congress, to favor or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation. This shall not prevent communicating to members of Congress on the request of any member or to Congress, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business. G. The City agrees any publications, studies, reports, presentations, films, audio visual materials, exhibits, or other material prepared with grant assistance will contain an acknowledgment of HPF grant funds and nondiscrimination policy as follows: "The activity that is the subject of this (type of publication) has been financed (in part/entirely) with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U. S. Page 3 Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. "This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U. S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20240." H. The City assures that transferred federal monies will not be applied as part of the matching (applicant) share, and that monies used as match on other federal grants will not be used as matching (applicant) share on this project. I. The City agrees not to contract with any party which is debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension. Current lists of such parties are on file in the Society's Grants Office and are available for review by the City. As a condition of this Agreement, the City shall complete and execute the attached Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and other Responsibility Matters; Drug -Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying (see page 7 -9). III. REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES A. Payments under this Agreement will be made on a reimbursable basis according to the schedule included in the Project Description (see Attachment A). All supporting fiscal documentation must be submitted prior to reimbursement. B. A Request for Reimbursement must include the following: 1 Request for Reimbursement Form (see Attachment B). 2. Supporting fiscal documentation for all project costs during the period covered by the request, including both federally funded items and applicant match items. (See Attachment C for Information on Allowable Costs.) 3. If project work begins prior to September 30, and the City wishes to claim these costs, a Request for Reimbursement must be submitted at the end of the federal fiscal year. Applicant match must be equal to, or may exceed, the federal funds requested as of September 30 (also see Reimbursement Schedule of Attachment A). Page 4 4. Final Product(s) and the Project Director's Report are to be submitted with the Final Request for Reimbursement Form (see Attachment A). C. The Request for Reimbursement Forms should be submitted to Mandy Skypala, Minnesota Historical Society, Grants Office, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1906. D. When both the financial documentation and the product documentation has been found to be acceptable by the Society, funds will be requested from the Department of the Interior and will be forwarded to the City when the funds have been received by the Society. I.V. AUDIT The City must submit a copy of all audited financial statements completed pursuant to OMB Circular A -133 for all fiscal years which include the project period. These must be submitted to Monica Zarembski, Minnesota Historical Society, Finance Office, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1906, within 120 days of their completion. V. AMENDMENTS AND CANCELLATION A. Amendments 1. Any significant variations from the approved work summary, products, budget, and performance /reporting milestones described in Attachment A which are experienced or anticipated during the course of the project and any significant problems, delays, or adverse conditions which materially affect planned performance should be submitted in writing to Mandy Skypala, Minnesota Historical Society, Grants Office, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102 -1906. The Society will respond in writing, either approving or not approving the changes, and may amend the contract if deemed necessary. The City is aware that some changes may require approval by the National Park Service and agrees to submit any necessary changes as early as possible during the project period. Variations which are not known until the conclusion of the project may be submitted with the final Request for Reimbursement; however, the. City understands that costs may be disallowed if changes are not approved. 2. If any part of the budgeted federal grant funds will not be used, the City must notify the Society at least sixty (60) days before the project's ending date.. Failure of the City to notify the Society may result in the loss of federal funds to the state, and may have an adverse effect on future applications for CLG funds by the City. B. Cancellation. The Society reserves the right of termination for cause on a thirty (30) day notice should it be determined that the City has failed to materially comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement may Page 5 also be terminated when both parties agree that the project will not produce beneficial results commensurate with further expenditure of funds or because of circumstances beyond the control of the Society and/or the City. In the event of termination, the City may be reimbursed for eligible expenses incurred prior to termination or by a negotiated settlement. Once this Agreement is signed, it controls all activities during the project time period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the date(s) indicated below intending to be bound thereby. Minnesota Historical Society City of Edina 345 Kellogg Boulevard West 4801 West 50th Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Edina, MN 55424 Michael J. Fox, Deputy Director, (date) signature (authorized official) (date) Programs, and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer (print name) Britta L. Bloomberg (date) City's Federal Employer Identification Number Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Kathryn Ludwig (date) (si ature- HPC Ch ' erson) (date) Contracting Officer ToPJI P. Ste 'Ir (print name) Page 6 U.S. Department of the Interior Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters, Drug -Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying Persons signing this form should refer to the regulations referenced Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and below for complete instructions: Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions - (See Appendix B of Subpart D of 43 CFR Part 12) Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions - [The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled, "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. See below for language to be used; use this form for certification and sign; or use Department of the Interior Form 1954 (DI- 1954). See Appendix A of Subpart D of 43 CFR 12. Certification Regarding Drug -Free Workplace Requirements - Alternate L (Grantees Other Than Individuals) and Alternate IL (Grantees Who are Individuals) - (See Appendix C of Subpart D of 43 CFR Part 12) Signature on this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 43 CFR Parts 12 and 18. The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of the Interior determines to award the covered transaction, grant, cooperative agreement or loan. PART A• Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions CHECK _ IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR A PRIMARY COVERED TRANSACTION AND IS APPLICABLE. (1) The prospective primary recipient certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three -year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses-enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three -year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. PART B• Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Transactions CHECK X IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR A LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTION AND IS APPLICABLE. (1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. , (2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Page 7 PART C: Certification Regarding Drug -Free Workplace Requirements CHECK X IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS NOT AN INDIVIDUAL Alternate L (Grantees Other Than Individuals) A. The grantee certifies that it will provide or continue to provide a drug -free workplace by. (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an ongoing drug -free awareness program to inform employees about— (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that maybe imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a): (d) • Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will — (1) Abide by the temnrs of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted — (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Check if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here PART D: Certification Reeardine Drue -Free Workplace Reauirements CHECK _ IF THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL Alternate II. (Grantees Who Are Individuals) (a) The grantee certifies that, as a condition of the grant, he or she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant; (b) If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, he or she will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to the grant officer or other designee, unless the Federal agency designates a central point for the receipt of such notices. When notice is made to such a central point, it shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant. Page 8 Part E: Certification Regarding Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants Loans and Cooperative Agreements CHECK _ IF CERTIFICATION IS FOR THE AWARD OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING AND THE AMOUNT EXCEEDS $100,000: A FEDERAL GRANT OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, SUBCONTRACT, OR SUBGRANT -UNDER THE GRANT OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. CHECK _ IF CERTIFICATION IS FOR THE AWARD OF A FEDERAL LOAN EXCEEDING THE AMOUNT OF $150,000, OR A SUBGRANT OR SUBCONTRACT EXCEEDING $100,000 UNDER THE LOAN. The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief; that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement., the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance Was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than.$100,000 for each such failure. As the authorized certifying official, 1 hereby certify that the above - specified certifications are true. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TYPED NAME AND TITLE DATE SIGNED (This consolidated form may be used in place of the DI -1953, DI -1954, DI -1955, DI -1956, and DI -1963 forms.) Page 9 Minnesota Historical Society Grants Office Request for Reimbursement for Federal HPF Grants Project: City: Address: Project Expenditure Classification: (use budget items from Attachment A of the Grant Agreement) TOTAL Federal Grant Number: MHS Contract Number: Federal Grant Amount: Total Expenditures Federal Attachmen Applicant Match Supporting documentation for all costs claimed in this request must be attached. Each supporting document should be labeled with the appropriate Project Expenditure Classification. I certify that this request for Reimbursement represents actual project expenditures carried out within the period of the project. Date: Signature: Print name and title: Telephone: Attachment C SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON ALLOWABLE COSTS All costs for this project must be in conformance with OMB Circular A -87 and A -102 (revised) and the National Register Programs Guidelines NPS49. The following points provide supplementary guidance and emphasis for areas where questions or problems may arise. The project budget is divided into those costs to be reimbursed by Historic Preservation Funds (HPF federal dollars) and those costs which are covered by the City (applicant match). All costs - -both HPF federal dollars and the applicant match - -must be adequately documented on a Request for Reimbursement Form. The applicant match portion must total, at a minimum, an amount equal to the federal portion. 2. All costs must be in payment of an obligation incurred during the grant time period. 3. All costs must represent expenditures which are necessary for the accomplishment of approved grant objectives. 4. Transferred federal monies cannot be applied as matching applicant share; monies used as match on other federal grants may not be used as matching share on this project. 5. Specific cost categories: A. Personnel (1) Project Specific Personnel are hired as regular employees specifically for the grant project. Eligible costs may include salary expenses as well as other project related expenses incurred for the benefit of the project specific personnel. These costs may be charged to the federal portion and/or to the applicant portion of the project budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported with copies of time sheets showing the employee's name, dates and hours worked, dollar amount, description of work performed, employee's signature, and the signature of the employee's supervisor. Either the City's time sheets with the above information or MHS time sheets (see Attachment D) are acceptable. (2) In -Kind Services (force account personnel) are regular employees of the City who spend all or part of their time on the grant project. Eligible costs include the actual salary of the employee including fringe benefits. (The employee must be working in the same skill for which he /she is normally paid, otherwise, only minimum wage can be used.) These costs may be 11 charged to the federal portion an&or to the applicant portion of the project budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported with copies of time sheets containing information described under 5.A.(1) above as well as documentation supporting the claimed wage rate(s). (3) Donated Services (volunteer personnel) contribute time to the grant project. If a volunteer is performing tasks within his/her normal trade or profession, the value of the contribution is based on the volunteer's normal rate of pay or the rates listed below. (The Society will furnish rates for other areas upon request.) Benefits are not eligible. If the volunteer is performing tasks outside of his/her profession, only a $10/hour rate can be used. These contributions may be utilized only for the applicant portion of the budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by time sheets with information described under 5.A.(1) above. Rates for Volunteer Personnel Appraiser $20.75 per hour Archaeologist $17.43 per hour Architect $25.57 per hour Attorney $28.19 per hour Bookkeeper /accountant $14.79 per hour Graphic Arts Specialist $17.30 per hour Historian $19.30 per hour Librarian $21.40 per hour Planner $19.99 per hour . Photographer $13.77 per hour Researcher $18.20 per hour Secretary $16.37 per hour Word Processing Operator $14.84 per hour Writer /editor $19.30 per hour Non - Specialized HPC Member rate $10.00 per hour B. Contractual Services are services necessary for the completion of the project which are contracted by the City. The City must follow the requirements of OMB Circular A -102 (revised) regarding procurement standards in arranging for such services. Eligible costs may include the rates actually paid to the contractor. These costs may be charged to the state portion and/or to the applicant portion of the project budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by copies of invoices and copies of canceled checks. 12 C. Supplies and Materials (1) Donated supplies and materials are those taken out of City stock or donated by third parties. The cost of these supplies and/or materials may be charged o& to the applicant portion of the budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by a Value of Donated Supplies and Materials Form (see Attachment E) which must include a description of the materials and/or supplies, date of donation, fair market value, basis for the valuation (i.e., invoice price, price in retail outlet, etc.), and signature of verifying official. (2) Purchased supplies and materials are those items bought specifically for the project. The City must follow the requirements of OMB Circular A- 102 revised) in the purchase of supplies and materials. The cost of these supplies and/or materials may be charged to the federal portion and/or to the applicant portion of the budget. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported by copies of invoices and copies of cancelled checks. D. Indirect Costs may be charged to the project only if the City has a current rate that has been approved by the City's cognizant federal agency and is currently in effect. These costs may be charged only to the applicant portion of the budget. Those costs must be included on page four of the City's CLG grant application. E . Mileage Costs may be charged to the project for necessary costs incurred excluding costs of mileage from place of residence of project personnel to the project site. Mileage paid for by the City may be charged to the federal portion and/or to the applicant portion of the budget; donated mileage may be charged only to the applicant portion. Costs included on a Request for Reimbursement Form must be supported with the following information: project personnel name, date of travel, purpose of travel, beginning and ending mileage, and rate claimed. Maximum rate allowable is $.445 per mile. 13 Minnesota Historical Society Value of In -Kind and/or Donated Services Time Sheets City and Project Name Federal Grant Number Name of Person Contributing Services Hourly Rate — Based on: Attachment D Type of Worked Performed (research, planning, secretarial, etc Volunteer personnel donating his/her time to a project may be credited with an agreed rate (See Attachment C of Grant Agreement) unless he /she is professionally skilled in the work he /she is performing on the project. When this is the case, the wage rate the individual is normally paid for performing his/her service may be credited to the project. If a higher rate than the published volunteer rate is used; additional documentation and verification is required. Please consult with the Grants Office before claiming the higher rate. Date Time of Work Total Hours Hourly Rate Value Hours x Rate Start End Start End Total Value of Donation Signature of Person Donating Time Supervisor Verifying Accuracy Date Date Attachment E Minnesota Historical Society Value of Donated Supplies and Materials City and Project Name Federal Grant Number Name and Address of Donor Description of Supplies and Donation Material Donated Date Fair Value Basis of Value Total Value of Donation Supervisor Verifying Accuracy Date MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Monthly Progress Report Form -- CLG Grants Grantee: Report for the Month of: Contact: Federal Project No. Daytime Telephone: Attachment F 1. Describe month's progress toward accomplishing the goals of the project. Refer to "consultations" and "final products" listed in Attachment A. 2. Is the project currently on schedule? If not, please explain why. 3. Describe any significant problems encountered this month which may impede the successful completion of the project. 4. Is the project on budget? Approximate costs incurred since the previous progress report (estimate only, including both federal and matching share). Prepared by: Signature: Date: Attachment A: City of Edina Federal Grant No: 27 -10- 21930.008 PROJECT DESCRIPTION City (CLG): Federal Grant No: Grant Time Period: City of Edina. 27 -10- 21930.008 June 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011 Work Summary: The purpose of this project is to complete a thematic study to develop local historic contexts that reflect the heritage of Edina women. The study will be used to collect, analyze, and synthesize archival data, which will be organized into historic contexts and property types that will serve as a basis for evaluating the historical significance and integrity of thematically- related heritage preservation resources. The final report will be organized similarly to the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form. The study will conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning (pages 44716 to 44720) in the Federal Retzister of 9 -29 -83 and the . Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office's Guidelines for Architecture/History Projects of July 2009 The project will be accomplished under the supervision of personnel meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. Consultations and Progress Reports: The CITY will inform the SOCIETY'S Grants Office of the name and qualifications of the historian, architectural historian, or historical, ar6hitect with whom it has contracted within fifteen (15) days of the contract's execution. The CITY will at the same time provide a copy of the contract and a complete report on the procurement process demonstrating compliance with Federal competitive procurement requirements. (See 11. ASSURANCES, item B, CLG Agreement, and Part VI of 2010 CLG Grants Manual.) 2. The CITY will submit a brief Monthly Progress Report (See 2010 CLG Grants Manual - Attachment F.) to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office by the 15'b of each month for the duration of the project period. Product submittals will accompany the monthly reports as specified below. 3. By November 2010, the CITY will. ;submit a preliminary list of contexts to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office. 4. By January 2011, the City will submit da preliminary list of associated property types, with descriptions, significance, and registration requirements to the SOCIETY'S Grant Office. 5. By April 2011, the CITY will submit draft of the narrative report modeled after the National Register Multiple Documentation Form SOCIETY'S Grants Office for SHPO staff review. Attachment A: City of Edina Federal Grant No: 27 -10- 21930.008 The SOCIETY may request other written progress reports and on -site reviews of project progress, as necessary. Final Products: The Final Products to be submitted with the Request for Reimbursement (see Part III of the CLG Agreement) and the Project Director's Report will be three bound, one unbound, and one electronic PDF copy of the report modeled after the National Register Multiple Property Nomination Form. Proiect Director's Report: The report will include a brief description of the administration of the project. Two copies of this report will be submitted to the SOCIETY'S Grants Office with the Final Products and the Request for Reimbursement Form (see Part III of the Grant Agreement). Proiect Budget: BUDGET ITEMS GRANT RECIPIENT MATCH Cash In -Kind Other TOTAL Consultant $5000 $2000 $2000 $9000 Project director $1000 $1000 TOTALS $5000 $2000 $3000 $10000 Reimbursement Schedule: The CITY will be reimbursed, in total amount not to exceed $5000, for the actual amounts expended under the federal (HPF) portion of the budget. The CITY must submit a Request for Reimbursement Form along with appropriate fiscal documentation, Final Products, and Project Director's Report to the SOCIETY'S Giants Office no later than August 31, 2011. All project work must be completed no later than July 31, 2011.­ PROJECT AREA 9. Project Area (please check 0 A. Comprehensive Planning ❑ B. Survey ❑ C. Evaluation ❑ D. Local Desgination Forms ❑ E. National Register Nomination Forms ❑ F. Public Education (please specify): 10. DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION _ Applications must include ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED for the project area checked above as outlined in Part III —pages 2-6 of the Certified Local Government Grants Manual. Include a discussion of how this project reflects the goals and strategies outlined In the 2006 -2010 statewide preservation plan. This comprehensive planning project is a thematic study to develop local historic contexts that reflect the heritage of Edina women. The study will be used to collect, analyze, and synthesize archival data, which will be organized into historic contexts and property types that serve as the basis for evaluating the historic significance and integrity of thematically - related heritage preservation resources Research will trace the contributions of individual women and groups of women to particular events and trends that shaped the important broad patterns in Edina history; the study will also document the tangible links between the contextual information and specific historic properties that can be recognized, preserved, and interpreted. The proposed thematic study builds on the findings of the Edina Historic Context Study (1999), which determined that heritage resources associated with women's history are under - represented in existing historic property inventories. It will also utilize data on more than 600 heritage preservation resources city-wide that have been identified by surveys conducted since the early 1970s. The study will be interdisciplinary in scope, utilizing the relevant tools and concepts of history, architectural history, cultural geography, and archaeology, with an emphasis on extracting data from primary sources. Every effort will be made to fully assess the reliability of the sources of archival data, and to identify possible gender biases and information gaps. Local historic contexts previously developed as part of the city's comprehensive planning process will provide the organizational framework; however, while the research effort will initially focus on refining these study units, sufficient flexibility will be maintained to recognize and develop new historic contexts. Project activities include intensive archival research in primary and secondary sources, review and organization of historic resource inventory data, and preparation of a written narrative report modeled after the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form. The study findings will be used by Edina's heritage preservation program to identify, evaluate, preserve, and protect buildings, sites, structures, and objects that meet established criteria for designation as Edina Heritage Landmarks. The information generated by the study will also be used to educate the public about significant historic properties associated with Edina women, and will undoubtedly help shape new strategies for interpretive and educational programs. (This approach was successfully employed by the City of Newport in its CLG grant - funded thematic study of heritage resources associated with women and children -- see Robert C. Vogel, "The Heritage of Women & Children in Newport, Minnesota" [August 2002]). The heritage of Edina women project reflects the goals and strategies set forth in the statewide historic preservation plan, "Gaining Ground: A Preservation Plan for Minnesota's Historic Properties (2006 - 2010)," specifically with regard to the development of preservation plans (goal /strategy #2) and the identification and designation of historic resources associated with underrepresented groups (goal /strategy #5). The project marks an important step toward implementing the goals and policies contained in the Heritage Preservation element of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. 11. PROJECT PRODUCTS Provide a concise description of the products that will result from the project. This project will produce a final narrative report organized along the lines of the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form. The contents will include a brief introduction and explanation of the reasons for undertaking the study, a statement of historic contexts, discussion of the results of thematic research, delineation of associated property types, a summary of historic research methods, major bibliographic references, and an inventory of thematically - related heritage resources. The document will be professionally written and edited, and illustrated with high - quality maps, photographs, and tables. The report will adhere to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning and the Minnesota SHPO Guidelines for History/Architecture Projects (revised 2008). The report will be delivered in both hard copy (bound and unbound copies) and digital formats. 12. COMMUNITY SUPPORT Provide a concise statement summarizing demonstrated community support for this project. Cash match is one measure of community support. Heritage preservation has been a critical component of community planning in the City of Edina since the city enacted its first preservation ordinance in 1974. Over the past thirty-five years, the city historic preservation program has continued to grow and exert influence on public policy making. Financial support for preservation is stable and reliable, and the city provides the Edina Heritage Preservation Board with paid professional staff. Federal funds for this project will be matched with $2000 in city funds and $3000 worth of professional staff time (in- kind). 1A_ 3. PROJECT IMPACT Provide a concise statement describing the expected effect of the project on the community's awareness and under- standing of local government in addressing local preservation issues. Describe any plans for promoting the project. As a planning tool, the study will enable the city to manage its heritage resources more effectively within a broader context by providing detailed information on buildings and sites that derive their significance from women's history themes. The proposed work will lead directly to the documentation of heritage resources that are now under - represented in the roster of properties registered or determined eligible for designation as Edina Heritage Landmarks. Finally, it is anticipated that the study will represent an important contribution to public history in its own right. 14. PROJECT PERSONNEL List principal project personnel and their qualifications. The study will be carried out by Robert C. Vogel, the City's Preservation Planning Consultant, an experienced historic preservation practitioner who meets the Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards in History and Architectural History. Associate Planner Joyce Repya will serve as Project Director, responsible for project administration and coordination. Members of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board (HPB) will also participate in the study as volunteers. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -50 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina has applied for and received a grant from the Minnesota Historical Society pursuant to authority granted by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966; and BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Edina City Council hereby accepts Grant No. 27 -10- 21930.008, along with the matching provisions of the grant agreement and authorizes and directs the City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. Dated: June 15, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 15, 2010 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of '20 City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 V o11e REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: III.E. From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator ® Action ❑ Discussion 11 Information Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Traffic Safety Review for June 2, 2010. ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, June 2, 2010. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: SECTION B -1 At least one resident will be in attendance at the June 15, 2010, City Council meeting to address the Traffic Safety Committee's recommendation to deny request for a stop sign for Brookview Avenue at West 55th Street. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Review for June 2, 2010. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, June 2, 2010 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 2, 2010. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Police Traffic Supervisor. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 15, 2010, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval of request: None for Wednesday, June 2, 2010 meeting. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: 1. Request for a stop sign for north/south Brookview Avenue traffic at the intersection of West 55th Street. This request comes from a resident on Brookview Avenue who is concerned with traffic safety at this uncontrolled intersection. Requestor feels that there is a lot of cut through traffic on Brookview that is driving too fast and feels the stop sign would help slow vehicles down. The requestor says that the traffic creates a safety issue for children and other pedestrians. Brookview Avenue is a 28 -foot wide north/south street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. A traffic study was conducted as a result of this request to obtain current data. Brookview has a Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count of 300 vehicles and an 851h- percentile speed of 23.7 mph. West 55th Street is a 26 -foot wide east/west street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. West 55th Street has an average daily traffic count of 127 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 14.6 mph. This study, compared Traffic Safety Staff Review June 2, 2010 Page 1 of 3 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \I0 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 06 -02- 10.doc r • v to one taken in 2002, shows that the volumes and speeds have remained constant. There have been no accidents reported at this intersection in the past five years. A similar request was made on June 24, 2002, and was denied by the Council on August 20, 2002 for lack of warrants. Volumes and speeds have remained virtually the same since 2002. Residential stop sign warrants are not met at the intersection of Brookview Avenue and West 55th Street. Staff feels that there is a need to establish the "right -of -way" at this intersection, and because warrants are not met for residential stop signs, staff would recommend the installation of `Yield" signs on West 55th Street for both east and west bound traffic at Brookview Avenue so the right -of -way would be made clear. Staff recommends the denial of the request for residential "Stop' signs for Brookview Avenue for lack of warrants and recommends ,&U— ,.r 41— 1.. 4- 11,.ad,... ,.r ccv.O .I. » ....... r,._ ­­&I.­­& & <_..Ar.,. 7 2. Request to place specified time restrictions for parking on Barrie Road north of West 65th Street, north of the bus shelter (across from 6400 Barrie Road). Parking is allowed on both sides of the street on this section of roadway. Requestor is a resident that lives in the 6300 block of Barrie Road who states that people using the express bus to downtown Minneapolis park their vehicles and leave them longer than six hours. Requestor states that there are 10 -15 vehicles per day that park in this location during the week (not a problem on weekends). Parking is restricted on all other parts of Barrie Road between West 66th Street and Heritage Drive. Barrie Road is a 36 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks. The Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count is 1,364 with an 85th- percentile speed of 29.0 mph. There has been one reported property damage accident that occurred on July 2, 2003, at approximately 8:00 am. (The driver struck a parked car from behind and was cited for driver inattention or distraction). Staff has contacted the area supervisor for Metro Transit who stated that the bus company will be placing fliers on a daily basis on all cars parked on this section of Barrie Road starting Monday, June 7, 2010. The fliers Traffic Safety Staff Review June 2, 2010 Page 2 of 3 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 06- 02- 10.doc l will inform drivers of the Edina City Ordinance that prohibits cars from parking for more than six consecutive hours. The fliers will also give drivers suggestions for alternative parking. This one block area of Barrie Road is the only place that Colony residents and their guests can park. All other sections have restrictions. Staff will continue to monitor parking in this area. Edina Police have been advised and have stated that they will enforce the parking ordinance. The requestor has been advised on the procedure for reporting violations to the police. Staff recommends the denial of the request to restrict parkin$ on the 6400 block of Barrie Road. Staff will continue to monitor this area. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. None for Wednesday, June 2, 2010 meeting. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled: 1. Twenty -seven phone calls requesting information concerning various traffic safety issues. 2. Three phone calls from residents with parking concerns. 3. Three phone calls from residents concerned with the speed of traffic on their streets. 4. A request from Edina Public Works to restripe Link Road at Vernon Avenue in order to widen the turn lane (buses were damaging curb). 5. Sixteen traffic studies were conducted on various streets in the past 30 days. Also, a 10 -day study conducted in the 58th & Chowen neighborhood. 6. Request from a real estate agent for traffic volumes on 49%2 Street and France Avenue. 7. A meeting with Sgt. Phil Larsen to discuss Radar Trailer locations throughout the city. Traffic Safety Staff Review June 2, 2010 Page 3 of 3 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 06 -02- 10.doc r/ 0w v ),0 • ,��RPOP.P�E9/ lees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III.F. From: Marty Scheerer Fire Chief ® ❑ ❑ Action Discussion Information Date: June 15, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -51 Department Accepting Grant On Behalf of Edina Fire ACTION REQUESTED: To approve Resolution # 2010 -51, this resolution approves acceptance of $156,510.00 from the Assistance to Firefighters (FireAct) grant program ( #EMW- 2009 -FO- 11862) that would be use_ d to purchase of Self- Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for the fire department. INFORMATIOWBACKGROUND: The fire department received an award notification of a Federal Assistant to Firefighters grant to purchase new SCBA on February 19, 2010. The funding is reimbursement for the purchase new SCBA. The grant requires the funds to be expended before September 30, 2011 and the City of Edina cost share portion of the grant project is a minimum of $17,390.00, which we meet. ATTACHMENTS: The resolution is attached RESOLUTION No. 2010 — 51 EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT ASSISTANCE -TO FIREFIGHTERS GRANT- WHEREAS, The City of Edina and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have agreed to enter into a agreement for, the acquisition of Self - Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) equipment for the Edina Fire Department. The City of Edina agrees that the grant is intended to protect-the health and safety of the public and firefighting personnel against fire and fire- related hazards NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City`Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby accepts the agreement and documents relating to The Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Fiscal Year 2009 Homeland Security Grant Program, Award Number EMW- 2009 -FO- 11862. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manger are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. Passed and adopted this 15'h day of June, 2010 R55CKREG 'LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page. -, 1 6/3/2010 - 6/312010 Check # Date. Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335118 6/312010 101833 A.T.O.M. 800.00 FTO CERTIFICATION 237574 25073422 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 800.00 335119 6/3/2010 102971 ' ACE ICE COMPANY 102.80 237215 0806035 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 48.00 237216 0806029 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 72.60 237217 0805945 5862.5515 COST. OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 115.20 237218 0806030 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON'SELLING 55.00 237219 0723795 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 42.00 237220 560306 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 52.50 237518, 0723844 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 488.10 335120 6/312010 126425 ADAIR, CYNTHIA 167.59 UTILITY.OVERPAYMENT REFUND 237353 052410 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 167.59 335121 6/3/2010 119813 AERIAL PAINTING INC. 250.00 REPAINT LIGHT POLES 237133 052110 08055.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 1-55 BROR RD 2,250.00 REPAINT LIGHT POLES 237133 052110 08054.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES L -54 BRAEMAR HILLS LIGHTING 2,500.00 336122 6/3/2010 101166 AHEAD INC 537.26 HATS 237430 INVO043703 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 655.01 HATS 237431 INVO043926 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO,SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 62.80 MERCHANDISE 237432 INVO051876 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,255.07 335123 6/312010 119463 ALEXANDRIA TECHNICAL COLLEGE 495.00 FIREARMS TRAINING 237575 00049136 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 495.00 335124 6/3/2010 .100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 264.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237317 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION _ 264.00 335126 61312010 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 265.05 MICROPHONES 00005518 237134" 15614 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 265.05 336126 6/312010- 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360.00 GIFT SHOP SERVICE 237318 052610 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page- 2 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER GRILL RECYCLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS STS -362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC STS -369 W 70TH STREET DISTRIBUTION 360.00 336127 6/3/2010 102382 ANDERSON, MOLLY 178.52 TRAINING EXPENSES 237576 052710 1400.6104 178.52 335128 6/312010 126410 ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY 100.00 8/4/10 EDUCATION PROGRAM 237280 SAFETY CAMP 1624.6406 100.00 335129 6/312010 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 1,227.24 FOOD 237281 1360368 5421.5510 1,227.24 335130 6/3/2010 102673 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAG 15.00 SOLVEI WILMOT 237282 6/10 WORKSHOP 5952.6104 15.00 335131 6/3/2010 100212 AT &T 3.68 REF # 651 281 1355 237577 0533610704001 1400.6188 3.68 336132 6/3/2010 100638 BACHMAN'S 200.39 MULCH 00006246 237433 20051 5422.6406 200.39 335133 6/3/2010 120814 BAGGALLINI INC. 408.45 MERCHANDISE 237434 IVC00287648 5440.5511 547.00 MERCHANDISE 237435 IVC00289703 5440.5511 955.45 335134 6/3/2010 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 417.50 GIS MAPPING 237135 23271068.00 -5 5913.6103 552.00 SANITARY SEWER COMP PLAN 237136 232701-106.00 -18 5923.6136 31.50 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 237137 23270354.00 -178 5923.6136 105.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 237137 23270354.00 -178 04362.1705.20 378.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 237137 23270354.00 -178 04369.1705.20 2,910.00 COMP WATER RESOURCES MGMT 237138 23271072.00 -7 5913.6103 4,394.00 335136 6/3/2010 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page- 2 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER GRILL RECYCLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS STS -362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC STS -369 W 70TH STREET DISTRIBUTION 1}55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010. 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 3 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description .Business Unit 75.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237578 060110 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 75.50 336136 6/3/2010 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION - 175.65 237221 53367600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,072.10 237222 53367700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK-SELLING 1,606.98 237223 53373600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS._SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 123.35 237224 83674600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 91.97 237225 83674500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 91.19 237226 5933700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS;SOLD MIX, VERNON SELLING 129.66 237227 5931400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD. MIX VERNON SELLING 146.86 237228 83647900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS;SOLD MIX VERNOWSELLING 333:30 237367 53367500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 1,219.25 237519 53461600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,990.31 335137 6/312010 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 37.35 UNIFORM PURCHASE 237579 052710 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 37.35 335138 613/2010 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 640.00 WELL SEALING 00001025 237580 10058A 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS - COLLECTION SYSTEMS 640.00 . 336139 .613/2010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 200.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009024 237355 OE- 225930 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 35.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009024 237356 OE- 226124 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 8.85- RETURN 00009024 237357 CP -OE- 225930 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES'. ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 104.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 237477 OE- 226893 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES -- PSTF ADMINISTRATION 9.75 COLORED PAPER 237478 OE- 226895 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 340.95 336140 6/3/2010 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY - _. 320.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237319 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 320.00 336141 6/3/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 62.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00065514 237139 - 59707 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 62.86 - - - 335142 6/312010 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 168.97 BUTT SPLICES 00005558 237283 900847722 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FALSE ALARMS - POLICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING OTHER 6/212010 7:58:37 Page - 4 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 168.97 336143 613/2010 122942 BORNOWSKI, CLAY 392.00 MAINTENANCE 237320 052610 5111.6103 392.00 335144 6/3/2010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 473.84 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003725 237406 87146732 1470.6510 556.78 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003725 237407 87150507 1470.6510 1,030.62 335146 6/3/2010 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 190.90 BATTERY 00005633 237581 407270 1553.6530 190.90 335146 6/3/2010 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 499.87 CANDY 237284 2340:024167' 5421.5510 499.87 335147 6/3/2010 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 717.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237321 052610 5110.6103 717.00 335148 6/312010 106026 BUREAU OF COLLECTION RECOVERY 25.00 ALARM BILL 237582 052710 1400.4332 25.00 335149 6/3/2010 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 88.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 237322 052610 5112.6103 360.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237322 052610 5110.6103 448.00 335150 6/312010 108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,458.10 ADS 237436 100503 -1 5410.6122 1,458.10 335151 6/3/2010 119465 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,073.90 237229 10703 5822.5514 30.15 237230 10704 5822.5515 2,192.70 237231 10706 5842.5514 3,296.75 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FALSE ALARMS - POLICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING OTHER 6/212010 7:58:37 Page - 4 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING HEAT 2,577.16 5591458 -4 237140 5591458 -5/10 1551.6186 FUEL OIL R55CKREG ' LOG20000 5546504 -1 237141 5546504 -5/10 CITY OF EDINA . COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6/2/2010 7:58:37 5596524 -8 237142 5596524 -5/10 5430.6186 Council Check Register 24.36 Page- 5 237479 5590919 -5/10 7413.6582 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 5584310 -6 237480 = Check # Date Amount . Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No' Subledger Account Description Business Unit 935162 6/3/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 335156 6/3/2010 228.00 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 237232 . 86400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 363.20-, 296.00 237233 237368 86431 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 196.18 418983 237369 86430 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 720.18 336166 6/312010 122084 'CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 335153 6/3/2010 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 328.33•..00113607 - 0342163045 237143 342163045 -5/10 1470.6189 812.25 SOFTWARE 237583 SRL0105 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL HEAT 2,577.16 5591458 -4 237140 5591458 -5/10 1551.6186 FUEL OIL 962.18 5546504 -1 237141 5546504 -5/10 1470.6186 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 34.66 5596524 -8 237142 5596524 -5/10 5430.6186 24.36 5590919 -6 237479 5590919 -5/10 7413.6582 11.16 5584310 -6 237480 5584310 -5/10 7413.6186 616.38', 5584304 -9 237481 5584304 -5110 7411.6186 4,225.90 335156 6/3/2010 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 363.20-, 237233 418760 5822.5514 358.00 237234 418983 5842.5514 721.20 336166 6/312010 122084 'CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 328.33•..00113607 - 0342163045 237143 342163045 -5/10 1470.6189 37.95 00103426- 0345052024 - 237144 345052024 -5/10 1552.6189 2,006.93 00103426 - 0345052006 237145 345052006 -5/10 1552.6189 - 355.53 00105263- 0335037016 237437 335037016 -5/10 5420.6189 2,728.74 335167 6/3/2010 123941 CLAY, CAROL 136.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237323 052610 5110.6103 136.00 335168 613/2010 116304 CLAY, DON 351.75 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 237324 052610 5125.6103 ' 351.75 335159 613/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 549.20 237235 0168165017 5862.5515 283.60 237236 0178075610 5862.5515 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SEWER .& WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING SEWER &WATER CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES t MEDIA STUDIO COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 237237 553547 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 237238 553548 5842.5515 Council Check Register YORK SELLING 888.30 237239 553546 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 237520 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 832.80 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 335160 6/3/2010 485665 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.20 ADAPTERS 00005383 237587 482782 1553.6556 22.89 KEMPER TOOLS, STAIN 00009210 237358 R200362809 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 29.89 KEMPER TOOLS, STAIN 00009210 237358 R200362809 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 52.78 336161 61312010 101704 COOK, BARBARA 501.76 PROGRAM COORDINATOR 237482 10 -1542 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 501.76 335162 6/3/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 604,675.00 WEST ARENA IMPROVEMENT 237285 70638 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 604,675.00 336163 6/3/2010 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 EMAIL MARKETING 237286 165928 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 100.00 335164 61312010 102596 CROWN TROPHY 96.56 ENGRAVINGS 237359 22610 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.56 336165 6/3/2010 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 472.78 CLUTCH, PLATE, PULLY 00005574 237584 150051 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 102.64 V -BELT, PULLEY 00005306 237585 C0530 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 575.42 335166 6/312010 104020 DALCO 173.71 TOWELS 00009204 237360 2209934 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 173.71 335167 6/3/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 6/212010 7:58:37 Page- 6 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ADAPTIVE RECREATION ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET GOLF ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC ART EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 2,155.97 237237 553547 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 237238 553548 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 888.30 237239 553546 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,422.55 237520 552596 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,511.62 335168 613/2010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 259.07 HAMMERS, WRENCH, SCREWDRIVER805104 237586 485665 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.20 ADAPTERS 00005383 237587 482782 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 MERCHANDISE 237440 436316 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CITY OF EDINA 100.83 MERCHANDISE 237441 436874 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,392.45 Council Check Register 335177 6/3/2010 126427 ECOLOGICAL COATINGS LLC 106.14 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 432.27 335169 6/3/2010 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 117.57 BAKERY 237287 334122 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 39.24 BAKERY 237288 334182 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 48.02 BAKERY 237289 334372 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 38.90 BAKERY 237438 334417 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 243.73 335170 6/312010 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 4,000.09 SURCHARGE - APR 2010 237483 9014053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE 4,000.09 335171 6/3/2010 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 472.50 FIREARM SAFETY CLASSES 237146 052410 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING 472.50 335172 6/3/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 106.48 650243624 237408 650243624 -5/10 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,859.50 110311893 237439 110311893 -5/10 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,965.98 335173 6/3/2010 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,473.91 REFUSE 237409 1107427 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,415.19 REFUSE 237410 1112039 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,889.10 335174 6/3/2010 121268 DIRR, ALEX 98.00 MAINTENANCE 237325 052610 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 98.00 335175 6/312010 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA 135.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237326 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 135.00 335176 6/312010 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 7 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL INSPECTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,291.62 MERCHANDISE 237440 436316 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 100.83 MERCHANDISE 237441 436874 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,392.45 335177 6/3/2010 126427 ECOLOGICAL COATINGS LLC 106.14 ANTI - GRAFFITI COATING, REMOVEF00009123 237361 2103317 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 106.14 335178 6/3/2010 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 475.00 TASTE OF EDINA TICKETS 237588 052610 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,350.00 TASTE OF EDINA TICKETS 237588 052610 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,435.00 TASTE OF EDINA TICKETS 237588 052610 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 3,260.00 335179 6/3/2010 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 40.31 PAINT, TRIM PAD 00009216 237362 82736 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 40.31 336180 6/3/2010 105417 EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 5,000.00 GRANT 237411 2010 1516.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HISTORICAL SOCIETY 5,000.00 335181 6/3/2010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE CALCULATIONS 237290 60731 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 2,000.00 335182 6/3/2010 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 391.16 MOTOR STARTER RENTAL 00005423 237147 375637 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DISTRIBUTION 391.16 335183 6/312010 122501 EUROSPORT 78.41 LIFEGUARD WARM -UP 00007174 237148 52957800'1 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 78.41 335184 6/3/2010 104991 EVANS, CONNIE 92.42 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 237291 052410 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 92.42 335185 61312010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 359.60 FUEL PUMP 00005625 237149 69- 011108 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.79 FILTER ELEMENT, CAP 00005627 237150 69- 011181 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 405.39 335186 6/3/2010 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 511.56 FOOD 237442 7291926 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5.50- CREDIT 237443 7220896 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 506.06 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335187 6/3/2010' 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 33.51 HARDWARE 00005289 237151 MNSTU31924 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 51.22 BOLTS, NUTS 237589 MNTC2101405 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 84.73 335188 6/312010 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS ' 20,733.76 FIRE HYDRANTS 00001217 237292 501244663.001 05494.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 28,508.90. FIRE HYDRANTS 00001217 237292 S01244663.001 05492.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES -5,183.44 FIRE HYDRANTS 00001217 237590 S01244665.001 05498.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES. 36,284.06 FIRE HYDRANTS 00001217 237590 S01244665.001 05489.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 2,591.72 FIRE HYDRANTS_ 00001217 237591 S01244668.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,183.44 FIRE HYDRANTS 00001217 237591 S01244668.001 05493.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 10,366.88 FIRE HYDRANTS 00001217 237592 S01244664.001 05494.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 20,733.75 FIRE HYDRANTS 00001217 237592 S01244664.001 05492.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 129,585.95 336189 6/312010 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 237152 19305 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 335190 6/3/2010 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 641.50 WINDOW CLEANING 237484 31545985 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 641.50 336191 6/3/2010 102267 FLAIR FOUNTAINS 43.09 FOUNTAIN SUPPLIES 00005599 237485 6076 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.09 335192 6/312010 105158 FRANKLIN, ELIZABETH 160.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237327 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL-SERVICES 160.00 335193 6/312010 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 9 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION WM -494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS, WM -492 PAMELA PARK WM498 MOCCASIN VALLEY'WATERMA WM489 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD DISTRIBUTION WM- 493 'INTERLACHEN CIRCLE WM7494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS WM492 PAMELA PARK ENGINEERING GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PATHS & HARD SURFACE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,350.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237328 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,350.00 335194 613/2010 126450. FRIENDS OF FIRKIN LLC 360.00 FIRKIN GLOVES 237293 052410 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 360.00 335195 613/2010 124424 GARVEY CONSTRUCTION INC. 4,837.50 CONCRETE WORK 00005604 237412 801456 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,692.00 CONCRETE WORK 00005609 237486 801457 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 6,529.50 335196 6/3/2010 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 690.52 MERCHANDISE 237444 30023622 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,027.58 MERCHANDISE 237445 11384111 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,718.10 335197 6/3/2010 103185 GERTENS 2,154.60 PLANTINGS 00005308 237446 197470 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 279.96 CEDAR MULCH 00005308 237447 197423 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,378.21 HARDWOOD MULCH 00005292 237448 195153 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 3,812.77 335198 6/3/2010 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 399.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237329 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 399.00 336199 6/3/2010 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237330 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 480.00 335200 6/3/2010 126411 GOETTSH, GREG 300.00 USED VOLTAGE & AMPMETER 237294 052410 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 300.00 335201 6/312010 124696 GRACE, LARRY 125.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237331 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 125.00 335202 6/3/2010 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 368.18 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00005613 237487 522 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 368.18 335203 6/3/2010 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 347.34 LETTERING FOR VEHICLE 00005101 237153 69767 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 347.34 335204 6/312010 101103 GRAINGER 108.23 SAW BLADES 00005548 237154 9253821152 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.68 OUTLETS, ADAPTER 00006426 237449 9249978116 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 133.91 R55CKREG L0G20000 CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION LESSONS GOLF REVENUES Council Check Register 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # , Doc No Inv No Account No 335205 613/2010 162217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 787.07 237370 119056 5862.5513 130.25 237521 119214 584.2.5513 • 917.32 335206 6/3/2010 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 187.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237596 052810 5840.6107 187.00 335207 6/3/2010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 212.20 WIRING 00005534 237593, 947639410 1400.6230 1,172.87 BULBS 00002078 237594! 947718921 5630.6406 497.19 BULBS 00002078 237595 947715738 5630.6406 1.882.26 335208 6/3/2010 123946 GREENE, VANESSA 112.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237332; 052610 5110.6103 112.00 335209 61312010 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 7,279.00 2ND SESSION GROUP LESSONS 237450 052710 5410.6132 4,365.00 % CREDIT CARD LESSONS 237451 052810 5401.4602 11,644.00 335210 6/3/2010 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 1,899.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237333 052610 5110.6103 1,899.00 335211 613/2010 100787, GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 239.49 WEED WHIP LINE, GLOVES 00005597 237155 81082 1641.6406 ' 239.49 335212 613/2010 126460 HARR, RICHARD 33.75 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 237597 052710 1424.6103 33.75 335213 6/3/2010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 182.33 POOL CHEMICALS 237156 . 3119550 5311.6545 182.33 335214 6/3/2010 106062 HAYNES. STEPHEN 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 11 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES'' ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION LESSONS GOLF REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES' GENERAL SUPPLIES. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHEMICALS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MOWING LIQUOR INSPECTION POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 52.50 SUPPLIES 237334 052610 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 447.50 INSTRUCTION 237334 052610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 500.00 335216 6/3/2010 126407 HEDBERG MAPS INC. 108.33 ADVERTISING BIKE MAPS 237157 9043 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 108.33 ADVERTISING BIKE MAPS 237157 9043 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 108.34 ADVERTISING BIKE MAPS 237157 9043 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 325.00 335216 6/3/2010 116377 HENRICKSEN PSG 64.13 CHAIR REPAIR 237158 450561 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 64.13 335217 61312010 101281 HERSHEY, JERRY 15.00 LICENSE UPGRADE 237295 052410 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 15.00 336218 6/312010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 16,922.62 SCADA SERVERS FOR NEW PW 00004327 237429 47663337 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM 16,922.62 336219 6/3/2010 126433 HEYDA, COURTNEY 68.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 237413 052710 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 68.96 335220 6/3/2010 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 9,875.00 PERMA -LINE SEWER - NEW PW 237159 12743 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 9,875.00 336221 6/3/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 832.02 FIELD PAINT 00005183 237160 87028 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 832.02 336222 6/312010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 61.00 237240 522879 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 481.75 237371 523009 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 629.00 237522 522817 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,171.75 335223 6/312010 106461 HOLL, SHELLEY 200.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 237335 052610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO R55CKREG 'LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/212010- 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account, Description Business Unit 200.00 336224 613/2010 J 126408 HUFCOR MINNESOTA LLC - 17,335.00 ACCORDION PARTITIONS 00005894 237161 1896 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING ` 17,335.00 335225 6/3/2010 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,223.84 CONCESSION PRODUCT 237598 508819 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,223.84 336226 613/2010 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 2,896.94 ID CARDS, RIBBON 237599 79749 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 2,896.94 335227 613/2010 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 301.54 PHONE /INTERNET 237488 6875504 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF.00CUPANCY 301.54 335228 6/312010 126412 J & A HANDY - CRAFTS INC. 74.99 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 00007175 237296 D1039924 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 74.99 335229 6/3/2010 118276 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 42.65. NOTARY STAMP 237162 66014 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 42.65 ' 335230 6/312010 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 96.18 ROUND CHINESE FINGERS 00001226:237163 98996 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL = :96.18 336231 6/3/2010 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 237132 060110 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 L 335232 61312010 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING . 11.64 GIFT CARD ENVELOPES- 237414 50093 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 17.47 GIFT CARD ENVELOPES 237414 50093 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 17:47 GIFT CARD ENVELOPES 237414 50093 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 92.66 - BUSINESS CARDS 00005611 237489 50014 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 139.24. -' 335233 16/312010. 100741 JJ.TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/212010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 227.00 237241 1390269 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 427.60 237297 1399224 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 140.25 237523 1390315 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,107.50 237524 1390314 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,212.70 237525 1390257 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 9,152.40 237526 1390305 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 68.80 237527 1390258 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,679.40 237528 1390306 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17.55 237529 1390308 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 26,033,20 335234 61312010 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA IN 53.92 OIL, FILTER 00005744 237298 1162195 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.92 336236 6/3/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,138.56 237242 1837168 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 33.12 237243 1837189 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 29.12 237244 1833146 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 470.72 237245 1838379 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.18- 237246 459422 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 43.33- 237247 459352 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.40- 237248 459351 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 62.74 237372 1837179 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2.24 237373 1841331 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 828.80 237374 1841343 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,212.78 237375 1841345 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 35.37 237376 1841346 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,634.90 237377 1841344 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,955.49 237378 1841342 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,166.57 237379 1841341 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 846.70 237380 1841340 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,713.31 237530 1841325 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 565.71 237531 1841326 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,403.20 237532 1841324 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 338.68 237533 1841323 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 182.34 237534 1841327 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,140.56 237535 1841328 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,378.08 237536 1841338 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,930.07 237537 1841336 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.36 237538 1841330 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,913.40 237539 1841334 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Register .28 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 5,577.14 PO # Doc No Inv No 35.37 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 237540 36.11 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,080.39 1841333 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,145.06 237542 1841339 5842.5515 20.80 - YORK SELLING 237543 1841337 7.33- COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 237544 11.03- 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11.16- 1841332 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 4.83- 237546 459227 5862.5513 38,744.11 VERNON SELLING 335237 6/3/2010 5862.5513 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE VERNON SELLING 237548 476.00 INSTRUCTOR AC COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 476.00 459608 335238 613/2010 VERNON SELLING 102603 JONAS, LENORE 459607 5862.5513 360.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 360.00 335239 6/312010 126426 JOY, MARGARET 28.96 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 28.96 336240 6/3/2010 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 110.64 ART WORK SOLD 225.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 335.64 335241 6/3/2010 100636 KATZ- JAMES, GAIL 80.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 80.00 335242 6/312010 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 1,310.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 1,310.00 335243 613/2010 106094 KOUTSKY, DEAN 468.00 INSTRUCTOR 468.00 237336 052610 5110.6103 237337 052610 5110.6103 237354 052510 5900.2015 237338 052610 5101.4413 237338 052610 5110.6103 237339 052610 5110.6103 237340 052610 5110.6103 237341 052610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 237540 1841329 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 237541 1841333 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 237542 1841339 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 237543 1841337 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 237544 1841335 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 237545 1841332 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 237546 459227 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 237547 459610 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 237548 459609 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 237549 459608 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 237550 459607 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 237336 052610 5110.6103 237337 052610 5110.6103 237354 052510 5900.2015 237338 052610 5101.4413 237338 052610 5110.6103 237339 052610 5110.6103 237340 052610 5110.6103 237341 052610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335244 6/3/2010 126461 KUCERA, MATTHEW 30.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 237600 052710 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.00 335245 6/312010 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 292.50 PLUMBING REPAIR 00005672 237299 5/16 MAIN 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 292.50 335246 6/3/2010 126428 LAKEVIEW DOORS 2,420.00 REPLACE UPPER ENTRY DOOR 00009199 237363 21513 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,420.00 335247 6/3/2010 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 287.96 WASHERS, HOLESAWS 00005540 237164 9225847 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 331.89 SCREWS, WASHERS, RIVETS 00001976 237300 9017756 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 46.64 PRESSURE GAUGE 00003727 237415 9234414 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 666.49 335248 6/3/2010 104670 LAWYER NURSERY INC. 361.84 PLANTINGS 00001459 237490 10129121 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 361.84 335249 6/3/2010 122472 M & I BANK 5.35 FACILITY EXPENSES 237491 051410 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.91 FACILITY EXPENSES 237491 051410 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.73 FACILITY EXPENSES 237491 051410 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 171.54 FACILITY EXPENSES 237491 051410 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 731.72 FACILITY EXPENSES 237491 051410 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1,056.25 335250 6/312010 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 933.97 237249 86184 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 933.97 335251 6/3/2010 103206 M/A ASSOCIATES INC. 299.25 CLEANER 00003746 237416 2168 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 299.25 335262 6/3/2010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 1,317.76 O- RINGS, VALVES 00005581 237601 2103725 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,317.76 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 16 Business Unit LIQUOR INSPECTION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TREES & MAINTENANCE PSTF RANGE PSTF FIRE TOWER PUBLIC PROGRAMS PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 -6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335253 6/3/2010 126469 MAGNUSON, KAITLYN 30.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 237602 052710 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.00 335254 6/312010 102197 MCFOA 80.00 MEMBERSHIP (2) 237603 060110 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 80.00 335255 6/312010 124142 MCNAUGHTON, MARY 324.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237342 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 324.00 336256 61312010 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 99.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237417 052510 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 99.50 335257 6/312010 101987 MENARDS 283.46 PAINTING & CLEANING SUPPLIES 00002077 237604 83260 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 283.46 335258 61312010 102281 MENARDS 154.65 HARDWARE 00005291 237165 27022 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.35 SAWHORSES 00005311 237166 30672 1646.6556 TOOLS 36.27 PAINT 00006429 237452 30700 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.46 BATTERY CHARGER 00005507 237492 27483 1646.6556 TOOLS 59.19 HAND TOOLS 00005594 237493 34102 1646.6556 TOOLS 15.97- RETURN 00005594 237494 34242 1646.6556 TOOLS 324.95 335259 6/3/2010 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 108.85 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00005307 237167 123723 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 138.88 BALLFIELD CHALKER 00005589 237495 123880 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.77 FIELD PAINT 00005596 237496 124052 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 417.50 335260 61312010 104650 MICRO CENTER 448.73 RAM FOR WINDOWS 7 PC UPGRADB8004330 237605 2772449 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 133.50 COMPUTER ITEMS 00003089 237606 2789845 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 582.23 335261 6/3/2010 125297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE 1,699.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 237343 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 17 Business Unit LIQUOR INSPECTION ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION WEED MOWING CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 100.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,453.50 1,699.50 0084157 -IN 4402.6710 335262 6/3/2010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 368.48 PULLEYS, WASHER, SCREW 00005100 237170 2,205.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00005667 237168 33630 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,205.00 49.86 FAN KIT 00005565 237171 335263 6/3/2010 1553.6530 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND Business Unit DISTRIBUTION 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page- 18 1,098.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT CLASS 237607 629430 -1931 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 1,098.00 336264 6/3/2010 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPAS 100.00 EXCEL FINANCIAL REPORTING 237418 ANGELA MCINTIRE 5910.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL (BILLING) PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MOWING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 780.72 COMPRESSOR REPAIR - MELODY LA$005598 237173 1324 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 780.72 336270. 6/3/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 100.00 336265 6/3/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 1,453.50 12 GA SS COVERS 237169 0084157 -IN 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 368.48 PULLEYS, WASHER, SCREW 00005100 237170 0084666 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 49.86 FAN KIT 00005565 237171 0084625 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1.871.84 335266 6/3/2010 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 82.10 MIRROR ASSEMBLY 00005066 237608 479457F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 80.16- CORE RETURN 00005042 237609 CM478134F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1.94 336267 6/3/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 152.74 MOWER BLADES 00005287 237172 727496 -00 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS 784.46 HEAD ASSEMBLIES 00006239 237453 730242 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 18.61 BOLTS 237454 729367 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 88.11 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005590 237497 730903 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 77.11 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005555 237498 730682 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,121.03 336268 6/3/2010 103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 135.26 RULES BOOKS 237301 93402 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.26 336269 6/3/2010 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS VII LLC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MOWING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 780.72 COMPRESSOR REPAIR - MELODY LA$005598 237173 1324 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 780.72 336270. 6/3/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. R65CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF tuINA 6/2/2u'i0 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/3/2010 — 613/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 473.00 237381 60035 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 328.50 237382 60033 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 183.00 237383 60034 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7410.6218 5440.5511 5440.5511 05506.1705.31 5120.5510 5120.5510 4402.1705.24 5210.6230 5210.6230 5125.6103 5110.6103 5112.6103 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PW BUILDING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY 984.50 335271 6/312010 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 156.00 TRAINING MANUALS 237499 2271 156.00 335272 61312010 104350 NIKE USA INC. 476.00 GOLF BALLS 237455 925728256 1,324.49 MERCHANDISE 237456 926429571 1,800.49 335273 6/312010 119357 NORTHERN DEWATERING INC. 2,289.26 DEWATERING HOSE 00005465 237174 23617 2,289.26 335274 6/3/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 9.59 PLASTIC WELL ROUNDS 00009140 237364 38398303 13.54 PLASTIC WELL ROUNDS 00009198 237365 38699301 23.13 336275 6/3/2010 106901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 15,211.95 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 237175 #12 15,211.95 335276 6/3/2010 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 126.46 REPAIR 00006039 237457 34245 962.50 SERVICE CONTRACT 00006040 237458 34340 1,088.96 335277 613/2010 124697 PARKER, CHELSEA 856.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 237344 052610 856.00 336278 6/3/2010 102440 PASS, GRACE 456.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237345 052610 544.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 237345 052610 1,000.00 335279 6/3/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 7410.6218 5440.5511 5440.5511 05506.1705.31 5120.5510 5120.5510 4402.1705.24 5210.6230 5210.6230 5125.6103 5110.6103 5112.6103 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PW BUILDING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 335280 6/312010 Amount Supplier / Explanation 947.65 2,256.01 3,118.07 6,321.73 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1.043.63 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 237384 8261622 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 237385 8261629 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 237386 8261611 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 237302 56169864 5421.5510 237610 56169880 5320.5510 335281 6/3/2010 50TH ST SELLING 126431 PETERSON, ALFRED COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 55.78 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 237419 052610 5900.2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 55.78 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 335282 613/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 161.12 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 237250 2912038 5822.5513 333.30 237251 2912286 5842.5513 44.37- 237252 3436293 5842.5512 829.63 237387 2915239 5862.5513 794.13 237388 2915240 5862.5513 1,372.20 237389 2915233 5862.5513 677.21 237551 5915236 5842.5512 41.07 237552 2915238 5842.5515 2,200.78 237553 2915232 5842.5513 925.20 237554 2915234 5842.5513 2,118.75 237555 2915237 5842.5513 114.24 237556 2915235 5842.5515 440.00 237557 2915486 5842.5513 246.36 237558 2915228 5822.5512 517.42 237559 2915227 5822.5513 506.80 237560 2915229 5822.5513 265.60 237561 2915231 5822.5513 11,499.44 335283 6/3/2010 100953 PHYSIO - CONTROL INC. 313.20 POUCHES FOR LIFEPAK 00003735 237420 PH768687 1470.6510 313.20 336284 6/312010 100119 PING 121.83 IRONS 237459 10195738 5440.5511 68.12 GRIPS 237460 10226304 5440.5511 189.95 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD CUSTOMER REFUND 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL POOL CONCESSIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG ' LOG20000 CITY OF tUINA 6/212010 .7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation. PO,# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335285 613/2010 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING " 282.40 237253 10611 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 282.40 - 335286 6/312010 100954 'PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 156.36 SPACERS .00005389 237611 1- 962697 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION,GEN 156.36 335287 6/3/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 585.00 BRM PERMIT #6171002 RENEWAL 237303 052110 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES6GENERAL 585.00 ' 336288 6/3/2010 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT . 15.00 LICENSE UPGRADE- 237304 052410 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS_. TRAINING 10.00 MILEAGE, REIMBURSEMENT 237612 052710 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ` TRAINING 25.00 335289 6/312010 105802 PRINT CRAFT INC. ' 683.28 EDINA LIQUOR SPRING CATALOG 237305 48776 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 683.29 EDINA LIQUOR SPRING CATALOG 237305 48776 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING. " 683.29 EDINA LIQUOR SPRING CATALOG 237305 48776 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 2;049.86 335290 613/2010 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 6,175.00 PUBLIC WORKS SECURITY 00001197 237306 .55451 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 6,175.00 335291 6/3/2010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 578.87 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00002076 237613 4799 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 578.87 335292 6/3/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,061.30 237254 309127 -00 58415513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,081.28 237255 310013 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING, 1,944.65 237256, 309955 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 931.67 237257 309957 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 362.40 237258 _; 310016 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 89.60 .237259 308580 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,504.60 237390 309159 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,866.61 237391" 310015 -00 5862.5513 COST.OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNOWSELLING 1,944.30 237392 310014-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON:SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 22 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,734.08 237393 309956 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 13,520.49 CLUB HOUSE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 336293 613/2010 126424 QUINN, MATTHEW 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237346 052610 5110.6103 270.00 336294 6/312010 104299 QWEST 349.96 DISPATCH PHONE REPAIR 237614 A163725- 672077 1400.6215 349.96 336295 6/3/2010 123898 QWEST 53.94 952 922 -2444 237176 2444 -5/10 1550.6188 114.13 952 920 -8166 237177 8166 -5/10 1550.6188 40.27 952 922 -9246 237615 9246 -5/10 1400.6188 208.34 335296 6/3/2010 104460 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 538.65 MAIL WATER BILLS 237178 3899 5910.6103 538.65 336297 6/3/2010 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 339.15 REPAIR WATER LINE 00003034 237307 54930 5420.6180 238.90 TOILET REPAIR 00006034 237461 54951 5420.6180 578.05 336298 6/3/2010 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 171.41 HITCH PIN, BALL, RECEIVER 00005624 237179 1144350 -01 1553.6530 149.94 RECEIVER 00005629 237308 1145616 -01 1553.6530 321.35 335299 61312010 100986 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 122.95 AIR FILTER 00005359 237180 C54966 1553.6530 122.95 335300 61312010 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 2,495.53 ATHLETIC TURF SERVICES 00005615 237500 38731 1642.6103 2,495.53 336301 6/3/1010 101682 S & S WORLDWIDE INC. 106.95 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 00007176 237421 6597541 1624.6406 106.95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER R55CKREG LOG20000 100995 SEH CITY OF tuINA Council Check Register WHPP UPDATE 237183 231298 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #. Doc No Inv No Account No 335302 613/2010 231166 126409 S 8 T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT - 183.74 ROUND TABLE 00001205 237181 01NZ5594 4402.6710 231166 4,058.39 OFFICE FURNISHINGS 237182 OINZ2607 4402.6710 148.24 4,242.13 237184 231166 336303 6/3/2010 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 230.59 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ 22.74 101: - "*9350 FRANKS, BUNS 237501 052710 4075.5510 CONSULTING:CONSTR MGMT 22.74 370.60 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROD 336304 6/3/2010 124901 SANDILLA, ELAINE 550.00 HISTORY BOOK WORK 237616 052610 550.00 335305 6/312010 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 583.60 INSTRUCTOR AC 237347 052610 583.60 335306 6/3/2010 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 4.81 LUMBER FOR FENCE 00005424 - 237309 40837851 4.81 5410.6406 5110.6103 5921.6530 Subledger Account Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Business Unit PW BUILDING PW BUILDING 6 /2/2tia0 7:58:37 Page - 23 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 335307 6/3/2010 100995 SEH 2,558.17 WHPP UPDATE 237183 231298 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES _ DISTRIBUTION 49.41 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ 237184 231166 08043.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT L-43 COUNTRY CLUB 65.88 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ 237184 231166 08049.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT L -4 9 . 148.24 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ 237184 231166 04297.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST 230.59 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ 237184 231166 03413.1705.24 CONSULTING:CONSTR MGMT PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 370.60 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROD 237184 231166 01214.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 370.60 ' COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PROJ 237184 231166 01213.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 411.78 COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR•PROJ 237184 231166 05436.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PHASE,IARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM 227.10 ST JOHNS PARK RECON 237185 231.168 04352.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT STS -352 FAIRFAX N'HOOD 524.09 ST JOHNS PARK RECON 237185 231168 05487.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT WM-487 FAIRFAX N'HOOD . 646.38 ST JOHNS PARK RECON, 237185 231168 03445.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT SS-445 FAIRFAX N'HOOD 2,096.35 ST JOHNS PARK RECON 237185 231168 01357.1705,24 CONSULTING CONSTR. MGMT BA -357 FAIRFAX N'HOOD 27,008.95 STORM /SIGN INVENTORY 237186 230825 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES _ GENERAL STORM SEWER 714.58 PAMELA PK N'HOOD IMPROV 237187 231218 03449.1705.21 " CONSULTING INSPECTION . SS-449 PAMELA PARK 1,570.74 PAMELA PK N'HOOD IMPROV 237187 231218 05492.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION' WM -492 PAMELA PARK 5,824.54 PAMELA PK N'HOOD IMPROV 237187 231218 04358.1705.21 - CONSULTING INSPECTION STS 7358 PAMELA PARK 13,105.22 PAMELA PK N'HOOD IMPROV 237187 231218 01360.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 55,923.22 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335308 6/3/2010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 896.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237348 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,008.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 237348 052610 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 1,904.00 336309 6/312010 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 432.32 FIRE ALARM MONITORING 237462 73600259 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 432.32 335310 6/3/2010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 327.00 RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR 237617 8392 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 327.00 335311 6/3/2010 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 375.54 COOLER REPAIR 237310 4551 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 375.54 335312 613/2010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 413.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237349 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,251.00 CLEANING / MAINTENANCE 237349 052610 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,664.00 335313 6/3/2010 106193 SPAIN, MARK 675.00 ELM TREE REMOVAL 00005302 237502 APR2310 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 675.00 336314 613/2010 119716 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC. 499.23 BADGES 00003086 237618 428961 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 499.23 335316 6/312010 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 88.62 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 237350 052610 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 88.62 335316 6/3/2010 101462 SPORT HALEY INC. 45.68 MERCHANDISE 237463 PSI - 162557 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,299.36 MERCHANDISE 237464 PSI- 162494 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,345.04 336317 6/3/2010 104672 SPRINT 39.99 CARD READERS 237188 666109817 -030 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 27.52 237366 873184124 -090 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier /. Explanation 42.88 48.64 51.18 51.18 51.92 60.48 62.32 68.28 95.04 112.20 147.52 153.75 207.81. 264.98 409.92 428.91 444.80 469.44 714.54 1,240.32 5,193.62 335318 CITY OF EDINA TELEPHONE Council Check Register MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS 6/3/2010 -6/312010 YORK OCCUPANCY PO # Doc _No Inv No _ Account No 237366 873184124 -090 7411.6188 237366 873184124 -090 5422.6188 237366 873184124 -090 5841.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1490.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1190.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1553.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1120.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1140.6188 237366 873184124 -090 4090.6188 237366 873184124 -090 2210.6188 237366 873184124-090 1322.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1554.6230 237366 873184124 -090 1301.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1470.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1495.6188 237366 873184124 -090 5621.6188 237366 873184124 -090 5910.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1640.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1260.6188 237366 873184124 -090 1400.6188 335318 613/2010 TELEPHONE 105842 STAR EQUIPMENT INC. TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 5,084.17 MECHANICAL DOCKLEVELER 00005886 237189, 207336 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,084.17 ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PLANNING 335319 6/312010 TELEPHONE i 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,762.11 -ENGINEERING SERVICES 237619 8203 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 2;762.11 EDINBOROUG4ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 335320 .6/3/2010 TELEPHONE 101015 STREICHERS TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.91 IRRITANT HOLDER 237620 1741009 29.91.. 335321 .6/312010 101017: SUBURBAN.CHEVROLET 90.84 -HARNESS 00005741 237621 241826 90.84 '.HARNESS 00005357 237622 236838 181.68 F 336322 6/3/2010 106.404_S UN,CONTROL OF MINNESOTA INC. 150.00, WINDOW SHADING 00005612 237503-,. 0015410 150.00 4402.6710 5500.1705 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 25 Subledger Account Description Business Unit TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE Y ASSESSING TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PLANNING TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE EDINBOROUG4ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page- 26 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335323 613/2010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 530.00 TASTE OF EDINA AD 237190 1251100 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 530.00 TASTE OF EDINA AD 237190 1251100 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 530.00 TASTE OF EDINA AD 237190 1251100 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,590.00 335324 613/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 35.00 BLACKBERRY PHONE REPAIR 237623 27467 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 35.00 335326 6/312010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,520.00 237260 Z00726 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,261.00 237261 MVP00841 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 743.00 237562 00141 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,524.00 335326 613/2010 120695 T- MOBILE 42.13 SURVEY PHONE 237191 042710 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 42.13 335327 6/3/2010 101027 TARGET 105.05 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 237311 051810 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 105.05 335328 61312010 104932 TAYLOR MADE 970.14 MERCHANDISE 237465 14091002 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 556.69 MERCHANDISE 237466 14065247 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,526.83 335329 6/3/2010 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 136.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237624 052810 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 136.00 336330 6/3/2010 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 126.57 LAMPS 00001661 237192 43614 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 363.30 LAMPS, RELAYS 00005072 237312 58012 -00 1553,6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 489.87 335331 613/2010 126434 TERVIS TUMBLER CO. 229.25 SHIRTS 00006037 237467 1509989 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 229.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA- 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/3/2010 -6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335332 613/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 299.00 237262 590666 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS'SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,942.45 237563 592008 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,458.05 237564 593117 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 161.15 237565 593116 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 11,860.65 335333 6/312010 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 2,423.93 LCD PROJECTOR. 00004329 237625 580481 -2 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 2,423.93 336334 6/3/2010 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 208.42 . CONTRACT TURF CARE 00005616 237504 777993 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 507.68 CONTRACT TURF. CARE _ 00005616 237505 777395 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 208.42 TURF CARE 00005853 237506 777394 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 924.52 - 335335 6/3/2010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 126.70 SWITCH 00005541 237193 J130418 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 766.36. STEERING VALVE 00006213 237468 SI22257 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE.& GROUNDS 653.54- RETURN 237469 SCO1075 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 239.52 336336 6/3/2010 106243 TUSHIE'MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 573.56 YORK LOADING DOCK PROJECT 237422 207176A -13 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 573.56 335337 6/3/2010 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT ' . 115.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 237423 101666018. 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 115.00 335338 6/3/2010 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 577.13 SEED 00006431 237470 23079 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT, MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 577.13 335339 .61312010 124695 TYLER, TOM _ 180.00 'INSTRUCTOR AC,_ 237351 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 335340 6/3/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 7.85 SHIPPING CHARGE 237314 TRAN: 0870 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 -6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description PRINTING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POSTAGE TOOLS LEASE LINES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TOOLS 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 28 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF CARS EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7.85 CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 336341 6/3/2010 101364 USGA 57.13 BOOKLETS 00006035 237313 A211 -5890 5410.6575 57.13 335342 6/3/2010 119476 USPCA REGION 12 100.00 REGISTRATION FEE 237626 052710 1400.6104 100.00 336343 6/3/2010 100060 USPS - HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 237194 052510 1550.6235 4,000.00 336344 613/2010 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 2,095.00 E -Z -GO CART FOR PW BLDG 00001447 237424 51010003 1646.6556 290.00 GOLF CAR RENTALS 00006023 237471 48020 5423.6216 144.03 TAX 237627 51010002TAX 421553.6710 144.03 TAX 237628 51010003TAX 1646.6556 2,673.06 336346 6/312010 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 514.92 LOCKS 00005192 237195 248414 1646.6406 64.77. SAFETY GLASSES 00005557 237315 249331 1552.6406 579.69 336346 6/3/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA 504.10 237263 0026210 -IN 5842.5513 212.75 237264 0026209 -IN 5822.5512 185.64 237566 0026446 -IN 5842.5513 902.49 336347 6/3/2010 101932 VOTH, BART 10.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237629 052710 5919.6106 10.00 336348 613/2010 101071 WALLIN, JOHN 121.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237316 052510 1160.6107 121.00 336349 6/3/2010 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 427,17 TRAINING EXPENSES 237630 052710 1400.6104 PRINTING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POSTAGE TOOLS LEASE LINES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TOOLS 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 28 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF CARS EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING FINANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7'58:37 Council Check Register Page - 29 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 r Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation ` PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Accobnt Description Business.Unit 427.17 335350 6/312010 104681 WEBB, DONNA 48.00 . SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 237352, 052610 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION - 216.00 INSTRUCTION 237352 052610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 264.00 335351 613/2010 102020 WELLS, GARY - 10.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237631 052710 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 10.00 335352 6/3/2010 103266 _ WELSH COMPANIES LLC 566.06 JUNE 2010 MAINTENANCE 237196 060110 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 566.06 336353 6/3/2010 126432 WILLIAMSON, RANDY _ 328.52 ICE TIME REFUND 237425 052710 5511.6136, PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 328.52 335364 613/2010 114688 WILSON; ROBERT C. 117.54 MAAO SUMMER. SEMINARS 237632. 052810- 1190.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS ASSESSING 117.54 335355 6/312010 101033. WINE COMPANY, THE 973.53 237394 243606 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 919.21 237395 243603 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE, 50TH ST SELLING 964.29 237396 243712700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 320.00 2375.67 243871 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3.177.03 335356 6/312010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 635.58 237397 319084 5862.5513. COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.60- 237398 48.433 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,172.01. 237568 319083 5842.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE YORK SELLING 659.14 237569 319131 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE VERNON SELLING 990.30 237570 319082 5822.5513- COST OF GOODS 'SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,440.43 335357 6/3/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 81.96 237.265 401694 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 150.10 237266 392234 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING ' 26.78 237267 404773 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS -SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Council Check Register Page - 30 6/3/2010 -6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 943.39 237268 404772 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 41.10 237269 404771 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,236.46 237270 404770 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 29.87 237271 398571 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 79.78- 237272 801800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.15- 237273 801799 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,871.44 237399 404767 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,802.59 237400 404775 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 149.24 237401 404684 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 210.10 237402 404634 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,200.20 237403 404774 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,257.88 237404 404768 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 161.10- 237571 802127 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.08- 237572 801823 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19,746.00 335358 6/312010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,338.13 237274 611080 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,551.95 237275 612016 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22.00 237276 612017 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,062.04 237277 611049 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 120.00 237633 583392COR 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 60.00- 237634 604885COR 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 10,034.12 335369 6/3/2010 118396 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 86.99 SHIELD 00003706 237426 E710847 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 48.83 REFLECTIVE NUMBERS 00003706 237427 E712993 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 135.82 335360 6/312010 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 91.30 DEFLECTORS 00006411 237472 241477 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 91.30 336361 6/3/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 621.75 237278 248598 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 756.00 237279 248600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 899.50 237405 248597 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,277.25 336362 6/3/2010 123911 WRAP CITY GRAPHICS 16.03 SIGN 00006041 237473 10-180 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTR/ - -`i R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/3/2010 — 6/3/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description 16.03 335363 6/312010 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,139.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 237197 27 -01686 -020 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 43,761.00 70TH ST FINAL DESIGN 237198 3 -01686 -160 01367.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 44,900.00 335364 6/3/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 54.56 51- 4420190 -3 237199 239970989 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,333.24 51- 4159265 -8 237507 239967102 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER 7,977.72 51-6955679 -8 237635 240691876 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER 9,306.99 51- 6644819 -9 237636 240170498 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER 19, 672.51 335366 6/312010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 494.01 GASOLINE 237474 981869 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,104.40 DIESEL 237475 981868 5422.6581 GASOLINE 547.56 GASOLINE 237476 981867 5422.6581 GASOLINE 2,145.97 335366 6/312010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 336367 613/2010 102600 ZIMMERMAN, TIM 71.32 GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES 71.32 1,276,686.24 Grand Total 6/2/2010 7:58:37 Page - 31 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PSTF OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 237573 9544 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 237428 052610 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,276,686.24 Total Payments 1,276,686.24 GENERAL TURF CARE R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2/2010 7:59:29 Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/3/2010 - 6/3/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 69,203.90 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 112.20 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,098.00 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 2,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 119,599.25 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2,915.30 05100 ART CENTER FUND 23,353.25 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,088.96 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,827.38 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 36,170.08 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 607,841.13 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 12,374.77 05800 LIQUOR FUND 181,781.52 05900 UTILITY FUND 174,177.26 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 34,472.55 05950 RECYCLING FUND 15.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,655.69 Report Totals 1,276,686.24 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll I and Procedures l9 3 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335368 611012010 126530 612 CLOTHING 928.40 STAFF T- SHIRTS 238052. 3497 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 928.40 335369 6110/2010 100612 A.M. LEONARD 142.93 GLOVES, SAW, SOIL KNIVES 00002085 237919 C110044468 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.99 FERTILIZER 00002085 237920 C110044107 5630.6540 FERTILIZER 244.92 335370 6/10/2010 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 115.72 CARPET CLEANING 238059 1270605 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 115.72 335371 6110/2010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 90.80 237787 0333138 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 41.40 237788 0333135 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 37.00 237789 0723887 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 122.60 238095 0333134 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 67.20 238096 0723843 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 114.80 238097 0723886 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 27.80 238098 0333226 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 119.80 238099 0723888 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 621.40 335372 6/1012010 101949 ADDED TOUCH 1,600.00 PREP & FINISH POOL PADS 237694 052410 5311.6532 PAINT 1,600.00 335373 6/10/2010 101829 AMERICAN SANDBLASTING INC. 3,400.00 REPAIR POOL JOINTS 237695 CE052520102 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 34,500.00 SANDBLAST & PAINT POOL 00007147 237696' CE05252010 5311.6532 PAINT 37,900.00 335374 6110/2010 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 49.00 237637 053110 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 52.10 237637 053110 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 112.26 237637 053110 5861.6201 LAUNDRY - 119.96 237637 053110 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 204.74 237637 053110 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 215.26 237637 053110 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 230.87 237637 053110 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 984.19 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Page- 1 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER CENTENNIAL LAKES' CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY HALL GENERAL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERN014 SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING - POOLOPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/1012010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335375 6/10/2010 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 848.30 FOOD 237921 1364736 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 848.30 335376 611012010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 330.65 COFFEE 237922 909942 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 91.51 COFFEE 237923 416480 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 9.00 COFFEE 238060 640516 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 247.41 COFFEE 238061 640515 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 678.57 335377 6/10/2010 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 96.19 ALARM MONITORING 00005622 237697 143970 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 144.28 ALARM MONITORING 00005621 237698 143969 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.47 335378 6/10/2010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 237758 060110 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 237758 060110 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 237758 060110 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 56.55 237758 060110 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 73.92 237758 060110 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 81.29 237758 060110 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.66 237758 060110 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 88.77 237758 060110 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 99.35 237758 060110 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 173.08 237758 060110 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 197.25 237758 060110 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 232.79 237758 060110 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 238.25 237758 060110 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 264.90 237758 060110 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 264.91 237758 060110 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 309.03 237758 060110 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 379.29 237758 060110 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 424.03 237758 060110 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 612.03 237758 060110 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 391.32 237924 1- 146354 -6/10 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 4.081.41 335379 6/10/2010 101405 ASSET RECOVERY CORP. 295.62 RECYCLING SERVICES 238062 6521351 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICE- "ENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EUINA Council Check Register 6/10/2010 - 6110/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 295.62 6/912010 9:32:42 Page = 3 Business Unit 335380 6/1012010 103241 BALDINGER, -WENDY 125.00 PROGRAM ON 6/17/10 238058 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 125.00 336381 6/10/2010 118883 BAN -KOE SYSTEMS INC. 270.87 FIRE ALARM REPAIR 00008057 237925 57696 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 270.87 336382 6/10/2010 100642 BANNERS TO GO 32.34 VINYL LETTERING 00005539 237699 30026 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 32.34 335,383 6110/2010 104346 BARCLAY AUDIO 188.27 THEATER LIGHTING REPAIR 237926. 052510 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 188.27 335384 6/10/2010 102449 'BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 224.82 'BOOSTER PACK 00005747 237927 2610 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 224.82 335385 6110/2010 125190' - BEDDOR, WILLIAM 40.00 PROGRAM REFUND 238063 060110 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 40.00 336386 611012010 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 572.30 237790 53461700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 102.30 237791 53488300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON.SELLING 18.08 237792 53461800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 674.70 237793 53468200 5842.5512 COST-OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 430.10. 237794 53468100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 680.40 237795 53461500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 32.50 - 237796 83706900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 289.44 238100 83733000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS.SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 205.89 238101 5940900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 129.66 238102 5938500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 114.22 238103 83706800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4.74 238104 53447200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,244.85 335387 6/10/2010 100401 BELTRAN COUNTY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 4 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 237759 060210 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 100.00 335388 6/10/2010 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 555.75 LAWN CARE 237928 135649 7411.6136 SNOW 8 LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 555.75 335389 6/10/2010 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 42.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238130 060710 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 42.80 335390 6/10/2010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 33.51 STAPLE CARTRIDGES 238064 W0-620387 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5.16 BUSINESS CARD HOLDER 238065 WO- 620659 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6.34- RETURN 238066 CP- WO- 619530 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 14.92 SEALS 238067 WO- 621560 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 64.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238068 WO- 624704 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 111.59 335391 6/10/2010 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 65.19 TOILET SERVICE 237929 20695 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 65.19 TOILET SERVICE 237930 20696 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 34.34 TOILET SERVICE 237931 20697 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 164.72 335392 6/10/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 26.70 INK CARTRIDGE 00005577 237638 60147 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 38.52 TAPE CARTRIDGE 00005786 237932 60271 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 114.97 RIBBON CARTRIDGE, TONER 00005786 237933 60240 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 114.98 RIBBON CARTRIDGE, TONER 00005786 237933 60240 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.69 RIBBON CARTRIDGE, TONER 00005786 237933 60240 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 229.95 RIBBON CARTRIDGE, TONER 00005786 237933 60240 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 229.95 RIBBON CARTRIDGE, TONER 00005786 237933 60240 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 459.90 RIBBON CARTRIDGE, TONER 00005786 237933 60240 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,333.66 335393 6/10/2010 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 50.86 FILTERS 00005635 237700 408438 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 272.47 SWITCH, FILTERS 00005636 237701 408460 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 290.28- CREDIT 00005388 237702 403852C 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 389.64 STARTER 00005749 237760 408621 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 188.27 CONDENSER 00005743 237934 406318 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG 'LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 5 6/10/2010, - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier) Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger- Account Description Business Unit 610.96 335394 6/10/2010 125165 BRAUN, MICHAEL 60.00 PHOTO FOR WATER REPORT 237935 1026 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 60.00 POSTER PHOTO 237936 1027 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 120.00 335395 6 /10 /2010 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 389.91. DOOR REPAIR 237937 513313S 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 122.91 WINDOW REPAIR 237938 513303S 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 512.82 335396 6/10/2010 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.: 549.53 AGLIME 00005600 237939 053110 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 549.53 335397 6/1012010 119626- BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 789.15 NEWSLETTER 00008244 237703 21670 1628.6575.. PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS ' 789.15 335398 6/10/2010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,209.50 237797 10707 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,295.45 237798 10802 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING - 86.80 237799 10800 5842.5515 ` COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14.65 237800 10788 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 171.50 237801 10787 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING - -. 96:60 237940 10764 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 71874.50 335399 6/1012010 100678 CARLSON PRINTING CO. ' 520.28 SUMMER CALENDARS 237761 00097271 5631.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 520.28 335400 611012010 117800 CARLSON, JOHN 150.00 PROGRAM ON 6/15/10 238055 060601 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 336401 6/1012010 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 120.00 REGISTER MAINTENANCE 237941 060310 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL`SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 120.00 335402 611012010 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 268.79 ACROBAT PRO 00004332 237704 STB8600 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 268.79 335403 6/10/2010 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 151.26 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 237639 68330 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 151.26 335404 6/10/2010 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 180.00 237684 418782 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 180.00 335406 6/10/2010 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 2,500.00 CANINE HANDLERS SCHOOL 237640 114249 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,500.00 335406 6/10/2010 126189 CLINTON, THOMAS 40.00 PROGRAM REFUND 238069 060110 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 40.00 335407 6/10/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 225.60 238105 0189556826 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 344.90 238106 0108028417 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 570.50 335408 6/1012010 120433 COMCAST 82.59 8772 10 614 0164959 237942 164959 -5/10 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 237943 199138 -5/10 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 237944 177449 - 5/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 237945 165667 -5/10 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 304.80 336409 6/10/2010 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 861.79 ASPHALT 237946 051510 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 387.11 ASPHALT 00001222 237947 053110 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 458.08 ASPHALT 00001222 237947 053110 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 1,706.98 335410 6/10/2010 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 266.48 CLAY 00009209 237641 INV000052631 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 959.10 CLAY 00009209 237641 INV000052631 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 50.10 CALCIUM CARBONATE, FLINT 00009195 237948 R200362957 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,275.68 R55CKREG LOG20000 237685 553544 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING.. . 66.30 237686 553545 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON.SELLING 44.80 237687 552597 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 VERNON'SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336411 6/10/2010 554336 126520 COOKS DIRECT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,006.60 237805 554335 2,333.63 ICE CREAM FREEZER 237949 N211883 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 554283 5822.5515 2,333.63 50TH ST SELLING 1,910.25 237807 554282 336412 6110/2010 50TH ST SELLING 102596 CROWN TROPHY 97.94 PLAQUES 00009028 237950 22685 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 65.99 97.94 237953 7001706 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 336413 611012010 104020 DALCO, 336417 6110/2010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 1,265.19 LINERS, GLASS CLEANER, MOP 00008058 237951 2217053 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES . 483915 1553.6530 83.36. CAN LINERS 00009204 237952 2210992 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1,348.55 335418 6/10/2010 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 335414 6/10/2010 8.58 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 060210 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 73.95 37.92 237705 237802 5241087 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,192.86 CAMERA ACCESSORIES 190.00 060210 237802 5241087 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 227.92 335415 611012010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Page- 7 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH'PARK PUBLIC ART ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT VERNON SELLING VERNON.SELLING 2,916.75 237685 553544 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING.. . 66.30 237686 553545 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON.SELLING 44.80 237687 552597 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON'SELLING 6,093.90 237803 554337 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 67.20 237804 554336 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,006.60 237805 554335 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22.40 237806 554283 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,910.25 237807 554282 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17,128.20 335416 6110/2010 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 65.99 622833 WATER 237953 7001706 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 65.99 336417 6110/2010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 1.54 BIT 00005374 237762 483915 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.54 335418 6/10/2010 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 8.58 REFRESHMENTS 237705 060210 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 73.95 BATTERIES, DVDS 237705 060210 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1,192.86 CAMERA ACCESSORIES 237705 060210 2210.6711 NEWEQUIPMENT - _ COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Ctieck Register Page - 8 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date ' Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No -- Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 1,275.39 335419 6/10/2010 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 55.40 BAKERY 237954 334722 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 162.91 BAKERY 237955 334723 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 90.95 BAKERY 237956 334893 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - GRILL 28.65 BAKERY., 237957 334985 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL. . 69.70 BAKERY 237958 335189 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 407.61 335420 6/10/2010 1264731 _ DERUYFER; CALVIN 420.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 237642, 060110 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 420.00 " 335421 6110/2010 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 90.53 MOVIE POSTCARDS 237763 35667 5631.6575 PRINTING _ CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 90.53 335422 611012010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 16.68 237959 110350670 -5/10 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 16.68 335423 6/1012010 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 3,711.45 PAINT 00005556 237960 .802120989 1335.6532_ _ PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 677.37 PAINT 00005556 237961 802120988 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 4,388.82 335424 611012010 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. ' 640.18 TRAFFIC CONES 00005677 237962 0091527 -IN 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 640.18 335425 6110/2010 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 32.00 HERITAGE AWARD PLAQUE 237764 81170 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 32.00 335426 6/10/2010 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 66.02 LIGHT BULBS, SPRAY PAINT 00009124 237643 82760 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 66.02 335427 6110/2010 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 144.00 WINE 00006338 237964 112 -6/10 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 144.00 R55CKREG- LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/10/2010 — 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business.Unit 335428 6/10/2010 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 350.00 GOOD SAMARITAN CHURCH 237765 060310 1400.6011. SALARIES OT REGULAR EMPLOYEES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 350.00 335429 6/10/2010 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 1,260.00 COLON CANCER COALITION 237766 060410 1400.6011 SALARIES OT REGULAR EMPLOYEES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,260.00 - 336430 6/10/2010 103594 EDINALARM INC. 179.97 . MONITORING SERVICE 237963 60195 5422.6250 ALARM SERVICE- MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 179.97 335431 6/1012010 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 4,667.23 PUMP REPAIR 00005443 237644 0041171 -IN 5921.6536 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 4,667.23 335432 6/10/2010 117483 ENGELE, LEE 150.00 PERFORMANCE ON 6/16/10 238057 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL' ADMINISTRATION 150.00 335433 6/10/2010 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 4,433.18 ADJUSTMENT RINGS, GLUE 00001221 .237645 NN1134 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 4,433.18 336434 6/10/2010 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 36.03 SIGN 237965 190 -38267 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES _ . EDINBOROUGH PARK 36.03 336435 6/10/2010 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 20,984.97 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001022 237646 S01242463.001 05506.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 " 18,211.50- CREDIT 00001022 237647 S01242463.003 05506.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WW506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WfP #3 18,211.50 PIPE 00001022 237648 S01251886.001 05506.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES - WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 15.23 SCREW 00005669 ,237649 S01251864.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 395.91 CS COUPLINGS 00005573 237650 501252029.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,622.53 FITTINGS 00001022 237767 S01251242.001 05506.1765.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 24, 018.64 335436 6/10/2010 101612 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 21.04 LIFT STRAPS 00005459 237651 13353 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 21.04 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/10/2010 - 6110/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335437 6110/2010 126509 GAGNON PIANO SERVICE 90.00 PIANO TUNING 237768 052710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 90.00 335438 6110/2010 123080 GARDEN VIEW GREENHOUSE 819.51 BASKETS 00002081 237706 297825 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,076.73 BASKETS S ANNUALS 00002081 237707 297826 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 518.22 ANNUALS 00002081 237708 297827 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,078.86 WINDOW BASKETS, ANNUALS 00006235 237966 297833 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,505.37 ANNUALS 00006251 237967 297834 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,106.33 ANNUALS 00006235 237968 297835 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 41.78 12" MIXED POTS 00006251 237969 297836 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 6,146.80 335439 6/10/2010 103185 GERTENS 2,186.61 TREES / MULCH 00005173 237709 194237 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,186.61 335440 6/10/2010 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 820.00 SPRINKLER REPAIRS 237652 84908 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 820.00 335441 6/10/2010 101178 GOPHER 1,091.14 SCOOTERS AND BALLS 237970 8115520 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,091.14 335442 6/10/2010 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 113.29 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00005824 237971 525 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 113.29 336443 6/10/2010 126538 GRAHAM RESEARCH CONSULTANTS 5,873.60 5/24/10 SEMINAR 238070 052510 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 5,873.60 335444 6/10/2010 101103 GRAINGER 41.28 REPELLENT, SUNSCREEN 00005567 237710 9258376103 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.28 REPELLENT, SUNSCREEN 00005567 237710 9258376103 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 41.29 REPELLENT, SUNSCREEN 00005567 237710 9258376103 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 73.85 SCREWDRIVER SET 00005584 237972 9263682560 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 103.24 HAND WIPES 00005584 237973 9263938996 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 109.05 LIGHTS 00006430 237974 9255407554 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 409.99 R55CKREG LOG20000. CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6110/2010 - 6/1012010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335445 6/10/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,751.00 237808 119191 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 573.50 237809 119336 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 180.50 237810 119329 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,505.00 335446 6/10/2010 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 28.46 CYLINDERS, HOSES 00005579.237711 BLM0129702 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 140.91 CYLINDERS, HOSES 00005579, 237711 BLM0129702 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES: 304.34 CYLINDERS, HOSES. 00005579 237711 BLM0129702 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 152.56- RETURN CYLINDERS 00005579:237712 BLM0129701 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 70.64- RETURN CYLINDERS 00005579 237712 BLM0129701 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 871.11 COOLER PARTS 00005343 237975 BLM0128783 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ' 1,121.62 335447 6/10/2010 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 55.70 ELECTRICAL FITTINGS 00005678 237976 64891 -1 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.70 335448 6/10/2010 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Page - 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION , BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 170.41 REGISTER PAPER 00007516 237977 '269063 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING . 170.41 335449 6110/2010 101265 HASLER INC. 144.82. POSTAGE METER RENTAL ' 237769 12753787 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 144.82 335450 6/1012010 100797 HAWKINS INC. ` 2,654.25. CHEMICALS 00001216 237653 3121191 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,704.31 POOL CHEMICALS 237713 3121931 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 4,358.56 335451 6/10/2010 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS:LTD 231.36. NUTS & BOLTS 00005570 237714. . 1409279 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION . 885.96 COPPER, FITTINGS 00005572 237715 1413188 05506.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WiP #3 1,117.32 336452 6/10/2010 126532- HEARTLAND CAFE 750.00 REFUND - PAID FEE TWICE 238071 060410 1490.4171 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE PUBLIC HEALTH 750.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/10/2010 — 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335453 6/1012010 101676 HEGGIES PIZZA 255.80 PIZZA 237978 1704278 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 255.80 335454 6/10/2010 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 224.64 MEAT PATTIES 237979 022298 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 224.64 335465 6110/2010 126611 HELGEN, BETH 47.26 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 238072 060310 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 47.26 335456 6/10/2010 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICE 237654 OB13598 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 335457 6/10/2010 103763 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 218.94 SCRUBBER BRUSH 00002285 237980 7314644 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 218.94 335458 6/10/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 832.02 FIELD PAINT 00005183 237716 87269 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 832.02 336469 6/10/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,745.00 237688 523000 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 638.50 237689 522262 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 373.25 237811 523707 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,756.75 335460 6/10/2010 102410 HOOFNAGLE, LYLE 74.20 WAGNERSTEAMER 237717 060110 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 74.20 335461 6110/2010 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 369.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237981 060310 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 369.50 336462 6/10/2010 102942 HOWARD R GREEN COMPANY 2,000.00 PW SITE AREA PLAN 237718 #1- 20100044 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 2,000.00 CITY OF -AA 6/9i_ 9:32:42 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/10/2010 - 6110/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335463 6/10/2010 103596 ,INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTORS 215.80. WATER FILTERS 237982 784561 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 215.80 336464 6/10_ /2010 100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC 26.93 BOLTS 00005638 237770 C001053157:01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.93 335465 6/10/2010 100741 JJTAYLOR DIST. OF MINN _ 1,879.55 237812 1390346 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 53.80 237813 1390347 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING - 5,265.50 237814 1390316 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING. 10,733.41,, 237815 1390354 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,030.95 237816 1390307 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ` 39.05 237817 1390349 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,680.46 237818 1390348 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH:ST SELLING 220.50 238107 _ 1379988 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD, LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20,903.22 335466 6/1012010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 540.67 MOMENTUM HERBICIDE 00006245 237983 54482218 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 531.01 HERITAGE FUNGICIDE 00006365 237984 54551866 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 295.76 TURF PAINT 00006364 237985 54536651 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,367.44 335468 6/10/2010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR:CO: 479.36 237819 1845289 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 22.11 237820 1845290 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 324.67 237821 1845303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE YORK SELLING, 1,506.85 237822 1845301 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 237823 1845296 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD.MIX YORK SELLING 88.44 237824 1845300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 2,731.01 237825 1845297 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 1,539.35 237826 1845299 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS:SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,639.80 237827 1845305 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING '. 36.11 237828 1845304 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,275.56 237829 1845302 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,329.99 237830 1845308 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,012.10 - 237831 1845306 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 44.22 237832 1845307 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,796.13 237833 1845298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ° VERNON SELLING 1,922.09 237834 1845311 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 809.56 237835 1845310 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,307.30 237836 1845309 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 471.00 237837 1841817 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 125.52 238108 1845288 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 300.24 238109 1845293 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 480.85 238110 1845294 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 31.37 238111 1845295 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 214.10 238112 1845291 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,150.36 238113 1845292 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50,TH ST SELLING 66.74 238114 1845312 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 28,705.95 335469 6/10/2010 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 171.62 CHAIRS FOR MEDIA STUDIO 237655 052610 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 171.62 335470 611012010 122074 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 58.10 PETTY CASH 237719 060110 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 75.59 PETTY CASH 237719 060110 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 133.69 335471 6/10/2010 126515 KRIETLOW, SARAH 36.00 TENNIS LESSONS REFUND 238073 060310 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 36.00 335472 6110/2010 125571 KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC. 262.82 BALL VALVE 00008054 237986 111584 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 262.82 335473 6/10/2010 120611 KUSKE, BRANDON 68.24 UNIFORM PURCHASE 237771 060210 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 68.24 335474 6110/2010 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 427.87 REAR WINDOW GUARD, RADIO 00002041 237987 209926 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 224.45 HOSE REPAIR 00002086 237988 210883 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 13.53 SWITCHES 00002064 237990 211405 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 55.20 STARTER SWITCH 00002067 237991 211532 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 173.14 ENGINE PARTS 00002065 237992 211820 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 87.94 BATTERY 00002066 238074 211424 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 982.13 R55CKREG . LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2ui0 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page- 15 6/10/2010 — 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description_ Business Unit 335476 6/10/2010 100852: LAWSON,PRODUCTS INC. 327.57 ' TY -RAP, HOSE CLAMPS 00005563 237656 ' 9247862 1553.6530 REPAIR'PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 327.57 335476 6/10/2010 100864 `- 'LEITNER COMPANY 573.89 TOPDRESSING SAND 00006465 237993 202190 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 573.89 -, 335477 6110/2010 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 260.00 VACUUM HEAD 00007185 237657 INVO13541 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 260.00 335478 6/10/2010 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 208.00 237838 3703 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD.BEER 50TH ST SELLING 208.00 335479 6/10/2010' 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS ; 21.45 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237720 - 060210 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 21.45 335480 6/10/2010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,524.84 238115 86717 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLDWIX VERNON SELLING 1,524.84 - 335481 6/10/2010 114699 'MANAGED SERVICES INC. _ 473.49 JANITORIAL SERVICE 2379941, - C004791 7411.6103 — PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF.000UPANCY 473.49 335482 6/10/2010 101146 MATRIX 433.96 237772 607577635 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 433.96 335483 6/10/2010 124540 MAX R 462.47 DOGGIE WASTE BAGS 00002056 237995. 636421 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 462.47 335484 6/10/2010 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 1,010.91 - AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003741 238075 102150 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,010.91 - 335485 6/10/2010 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,742.75 TARGET FIELD TRIP 237721 052010 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,742.75 335486 6110/2010 101987 MENARDS 11.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 00005595 237722 86307 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.24 HERBICIDE 00002060 237997 77652 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 208.11 FERTILIZER 00002287 238076 85148 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 238.85 335487 6110/2010 102281 MENARDS 30.09 PAINT 00005595 237723 37598 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.60 DOLLY, SAW HORSES 00005610 237724 37243 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 54.84 PAINT SUPPLIES 00008047 237998 33082 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 29.90 MAGNET, BLADE 00005027 238077 7411 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.60 'CDX PLYWOOD 00005034 238078 9052 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 90.93 POSTS, NUMBER KITS 00005037 238079 9191 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 270.96 335488 6/1012010 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 51.99 KICKBALLS 237999 124307 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 51.99 335489 6/10/2010 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 355,505.96 SEWER SERVICE 237773 0000933280 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 355,505.96 335490 6/1012010 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 6/3/10 238000 060310 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 335491 6/1012010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 624.39 ASPHALT 00001224 237774 104532MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 2,196.69 ASPHALT 00001224 237774 104532MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 2,268.05 ASPHALT 00001224 237775 104343MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 5,089.13 335492 6/10/2010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,960.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00005681 237658 33632 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,960.00 335493 6/1012010 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 13,855.36 WATER PURCHASE 238080 060310 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 13,855.36 R55CKREG LOG20000 35.00 CITY OF tUINA " 335497 6110/2010 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. Council Check Register 1,057.47 CRS II EMULSION 00001212 237776 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 ROAD OIL Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6110/2010 335494 6/10/2010' 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 333.44 YOKE ASSEMBLY 00005634 238004 72.35 CO2 TANKS 238001 980700 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 188.63 METHANE 238002 980357 7413.65.45 CHEMICALS 260.98 283.38 CONDENSER ASSEMBLY 00005075 237777 479966F6W 335495 611012010 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 283.38 335500 179.77 UNDERGLAZE, CLAY TOOLS 00009217 237659 62124 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 40.95 ALBERTA SLIP 00009217 237660 62128 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 2,997.84 220.72 730045 -00 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT "- 335496 6/1012010 732515-00 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF, HEALTH REPAIR PARTS 3,183.34 35.00 2010 HOSPITALITY FEE 238003 50626 5631.6105 _ DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6/9/2u10 9:32:42 Page - 17 Business Unit PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF FIRE TOWER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 335501 6/10/2010 114345 NAIOP 65.00 2010 INDUSTRIAL REPORT 238084 060410 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 65.00 336602 6/1012010 126512 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF TELEVISION 100.00 MEMBERSHIP (2) 238081 052810 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 550.00 EMMY APPLICATIONS. - 238081 052810 2210.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 650.00 35.00 335497 6110/2010 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,057.47 CRS II EMULSION 00001212 237776 61001 1301.6519 ROAD OIL 1,057.47 335498 6110/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 333.44 YOKE ASSEMBLY 00005634 238004 0084875 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 333.44 335499 6H0/2010 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 283.38 CONDENSER ASSEMBLY 00005075 237777 479966F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 283.38 335500 6/1012010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 111.31 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005603 237725 732969 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS - 2,997.84 FERTILIZER SPREADER 00005310 237726 730045 -00 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT "- 74.19 FILTERS, PLUG 00006248 238005 732515-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,183.34 6/9/2u10 9:32:42 Page - 17 Business Unit PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF FIRE TOWER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 335501 6/10/2010 114345 NAIOP 65.00 2010 INDUSTRIAL REPORT 238084 060410 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 65.00 336602 6/1012010 126512 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF TELEVISION 100.00 MEMBERSHIP (2) 238081 052810 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 550.00 EMMY APPLICATIONS. - 238081 052810 2210.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 650.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335503 6/10/2010 126514 NOAH, JIM 78.00 GOLF REFUND 238082 052410 1628.6103.02 GOLF PROF SERVICES 2,401.61 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Page - 18 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 78.00 335504 6/10/2010 126510 NORLING, JAIMIE 13.46 SEASON TICKET REFUND 238083 060310 5300.2039 184.99 SEASON TICKET REFUND 238083 060310 5301.4532 198.45 335505 6/10/2010 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 81.74 DIGITAL RECORDER REPAIR 237661 IN18100 1400.6215 81.74 335506 6/10/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 62.63 PAINT 00009159 237662 38874101 5120.5510 25.08 ARTISTS' OILS 00009202 237663 38797001 5120.5510 87.71 335507 6/10/2010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 45.99 PAPER, HIGHLIGHTERS 00006034 238006 1217427361 5410.6513 45.99 335608 6/10/2010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 240.47 ZIPLINE CABLE 237727 594217 5311.6406 240.47 335509 6110/2010 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 2,190.00 ADVENTURE PEAK DECKS 238007 2058 5620.6530 2,190.00 335510 6/10/2010 118187 PARETO- HOLLROCK/SGD GOLF 69.92 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002087 238008 428224 5630.6406 69.92 335511 6/10/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 968.00 237839 8262237 -IN 5862.5513 2.27 237840 8261838 -IN 5842.5513 1,087.86 237841 8262235 -IN 5842.5513 315.00 237842 8262232 -IN 5822.5513 2.52- 237843 8261837 -CM 5842.5513 31.00 238116 8261649 -IN 5862.5515 2,401.61 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Page - 18 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 335512 6/10/2010 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 2830598 MONTHLY FEE 39.95 VERNON SELLING 336513 611012010 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 655.27 VERNON SELLING 508.66 673.65 522.34 2,359.92 335514 6110/2010 100950 PETTY CASH. 2.33 10.72 12.80 12.96 13.00 16.00 18.00 -20.00 26.00 37.49 39.43 39.55 41.00 47.10 48.25 67.25 76.53 80.00 92.50 816.85 335515 6110/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 161.67 57.12 1,896.17 2,216.06 500.77 1,989.25 CITY OF L ­n A Council Check Register 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 237728 7409098 238009 61933531 238010 56169903 238011 56169764 238012 61933555 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237.778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310. 237778 060310 - 237778 060310 •237778 060310 237778 060310 237778 060310 237778- 060310 237778 - 060310 237778 060310 237844 2918061 237845 2918067 237846 2918069 237847 2918066 237848 2918068 237849 2915241 5910.6155 5421.5510 5630.5510 5630.5510 5630.5510 5511.6406 1490.6406 5840.6107 1100.6106 1190.6106 1140.6104 1190.6107 1160.6106 5860.6107 1140.6106 1120.6104 2210.6406 1120.6107, 1100.6107 1647.6406 01362.1705.31 5840.6406 1490.6406' 1260.6107 2210.6107 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description BANK SERVICES CHARGES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS, SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE CONFERENCES &- SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 6 /9 /- 9:32:42 Page - 19 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PUBLIC HEALTH LIQUOR YORK GENERAL -CITY COUNCIL ASSESSING PLANNING ASSESSING FINANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL PLANNING ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL PATHS &,HARD SURFACE BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING GENERAL . COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE.. VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON.SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 20 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 215.79 237850 2918065 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2.24 237851 2918059 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 967.95 237852 2918060 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,025.96 237853 2918064 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,544.60 237854 2918062 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,371.74 237855 2918063 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 48.00 237856 2915485 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 875.27 237857 2915230 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.24 238117 2918070 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 444.81 238118 2918058 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,974.96 238119 2918056 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 841.24 238120 2918057 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.12 238121 2918055 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 22,208.96 335616 6/10/2010 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 196.80 238122 10643 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 196.80 335517 611012010 123726 PITNEY BOWES INC. 35.61 METER RENTAL 238013 313078 5621.6235 POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 35.61 335618 611012010 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 1,746.80 ATHLETIC FIELD MIX 00005288 238014 33707 1642.6543 SOD S BLACK DIRT FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,746.80 335619 6110/2010 100968 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 44.52 PEST CONTROL 238015 1748938 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.52 336520 6/10/2010 103256 POKORNY COMPANY 24.46 PLUMBING PARTS 00005501 238016 22268 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 24.46 335521 6110/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 237729 060410 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 335522 611012010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 UTILITY BILLING PERMIT #939 237730 060210 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,600.00 _ RSSCKREG, LOG20000 CITY OF �..NA - 6/91r ,0 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 21. 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger`Account Description Business Unit 335523 6/10/20.10 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 1,058.06 FUNGICIDE 238017 34668 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,058.06 335524 6/1012010 102364 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 498.00 _TAPE, MOUTHGUARDS 00008056 238018 299036 5510.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA ADMINISTRATION 498.00 - 335525 6/10/2010 101014 PRO MEDIA- STREFF MARKETING GRO 380.69 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION 238085 211615 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 380.69 335526 6110/2010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 410.40 MATS 00002083 238019 4756 5630.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 348.19 LINERS', SOAP, DISINFECTANT 00002083 238020 4771 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 585.18 TOWELS, WIPERS, TISSUE 00002083 238021 4782 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,343.77 335527 611012010 100971 QUALITY WINE - 110.00 237690 307459 -00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 100.00 237858 312984 -CO 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,026.02 237859 311569 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 650.40 237860 313048 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING. 404.20 237661 312983 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,694.40 237862 312551 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 296.24 237863 312981 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 208.40 237864 313047 -00 5842.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 76.00 237865 312982 -CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,748.39 237866 312538 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING. 278.09 237867 313049 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST'SELLING 671.50 237868 312985-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 882.80 237869 312539 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 12,146.44 335528 6/1012010 923898 QWEST - 349.95 952 927 -8861 237664 8861 -5110 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.72 952929 -0297 237665 0297 -5110 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE, MAINTENANCE 405.67 335529 6/10/2010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00005805 238022 763 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 22 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,009.25 335530 6/1012010 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 94.50 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 5431.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 94.50 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 94.50 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 189.00 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 189.00 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 189.00 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 283.50 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 283.50 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 378.00 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 896.75 ANNUAL RPZ TESTING 00005231 237666 12139 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,692.25 335531 6/10/2010 102794 REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY 3,826.13 RECYCLING BINS 00004196 237667 KE69317 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 3,826.13 335532 6/10/2010 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 22.99 SHEET CAKE FOR RESALE 238023 504 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 22.99 335633 6/10/2010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 614.54 SOFTENER SALT 00008044 238024 00235737 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 94.50 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 238025 00236012 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 709.04 335534 6110/2010 122272 RUGHONIEMI, JANE 50.00 PROGRAM ON 6/14//10 238054 060601 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 50.00 335535 611012010 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 WASTE DISPOSAL 00005794 237731 922131408 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 113.07 335536 6/10/2010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 21.99 101= "'• "9350 SUPPLIES 237732 060110 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 21.99 335537 6/10/2010 124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE 252.10 WEED CONTROL 00005620 237733 202 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF C" ;i7 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -AA 6/9%I...,, 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 23 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description Business Unit 252.10 336538 6/10/2010 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 123.23 FILTER 00005583 238026 113882 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING - - 123.23 336539 6/10/2010 124114 SCN_ S SPORTS FOODS 56.40 BARS 238027 27570 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 56.40 335640 6/10/2010 124421 SCOTT, SYDNEY 95.92 FOOD FOR STAFF MEETING 238129 060710 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 95.92 336541 6/1012010 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 PROGRAM ON 6/13/10 238053 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 335642 6/1012010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 58.67 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 238028 060310 5111.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT - 58.67 335543 611012010 126513 SHAW, MARGARET 4.68 PARTIAL REFUND 238086 060110 1000.2039 SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 64.32 PARTIAL REFUND 238086 060110 1600.4722.01 GENERAL PARK RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 69.00 336644 6/1012010. 101632 SMITH, CECELIA 240.03 RETIREMENT WATCH 237779 060310 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES, 240.03 335645 6/10/2010 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 PROGRAM ON 6/15110 238056 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ::" CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 336546 6110/2010 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F " 340.08 ABOUT TOWN COLUMN 237734 313 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/ NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS - 340.08 335547 6/10/2010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 140.00 EDINA COMMUNITY GUIDE AD 237691 1252360 5822.6122 ADVERTISING.OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 140.00 EDINA COMMUNITY GUIDE AD 237691, 1252360 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/1012010 - 6/1012010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 140.00 EDINA COMMUNITY GUIDE AD 237691 1252360 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 273.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 237692 1252359 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 273.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 237692 1252359 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 273.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 237692 1252359. 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 150.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 237693 1253801 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 150.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 237693 1253801 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 150.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 237693 1253801 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 78.65 AD FOR BID 238087 1253714 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1,768.65 335548 6/10/2010 102926 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 504.98 GREENS FERTILIZER 238029 2557RGR 5431.6540 FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 504.98 335549 6/1012010 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 1,342.35 DISARM 238030 6071 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1.885.28 FERTILIZER 238031 6061 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,227.63 335550 6/10/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 44.51 PHONE BATTERIES 00005785 238032 27504 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 44.51 PHONE BATTERIES 00005785 238032 27504 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 89.02 335551 6110/2010 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 802.63 6/3 AND 6/10 MOVIES 237780 RG1446202 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 802.63 335552. 6/10/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 140.55 237870 593945 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,419.70 237871 593944 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 612.00 238033 00771175 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 130.00 238034 00771094 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 90.35 238035 593372 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5,392.60 335553 6/10/2010 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 74.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 237781 060210 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 74.50 335554 611012010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 231.25 DRAFT MINUTES 5/18/10 238088 M17730 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 TRAFFIC MONITOR 00005571 237736 0000042897 1330.6215 CITY OF EUINA 665.03 774461 1551.6103 335559 6/10/2010 101042 TRIARCO Council Check Register 103.61 BUTTON PARTS, GLUE 00009211 237669 619734 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103.61 1644.6103 6/10/2010 — 6/10/2010 335560 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF. CARE 231.25 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 335566 6/10/2010 126537 TODD D. ANDREWS ESQ. 335562. 6/10/2010. 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 1,658.33 ATTORNEY FEES 238089 2779 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB 504.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 1,658.33 101668193 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 336556 6/10/2010 504.00 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING 10,362.00 PAINTING AT AQUATIC CENTER 00007157 237735 060110 5311.6532 PAINT 10,362.00 336657 6/10/2010 00005549 237783 101693 .TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL'MAINTENANCE 96.49 LABELS 238036 ; 25454 5440.6406, GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.49 335564 6/10/2010 125032 UNISELECT USA 335558 6/10/2010 103962 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 6/9/2u1b 9:32:42 Page - 25 Business Unit GOLF BALANCE SHEET r POOL OPERATION 665.03 TRAFFIC MONITOR 00005571 237736 0000042897 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 665.03 774461 1551.6103 335559 6/10/2010 101042 TRIARCO 103.61 BUTTON PARTS, GLUE 00009211 237669 619734 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103.61 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-` 335560 6/10/2010 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 888.20 844.31 CYLINDER 00005387 238037 169386 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 844.31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF. CARE 335561 6/1012010 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES TRAFFIC SIGNALS PUBLIC ART EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 144.29 TURF / TREE CARE 00005819 237737 774461 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 112.22 TURF / TREE CARE 00005623 237738 775026 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-` TREES & MAINTENANCE 888.20 WEED CONTROL 00005823 238090 5/18/10 STMT 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF. CARE 1,144.71 335562. 6/10/2010. 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 504.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 237782 101668193 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 504.00 335663 6/10/2010 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 105.22 MULCH, FERTILIZER 00005549 237783 23040 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL'MAINTENANCE 105.22 335564 6/10/2010 125032 UNISELECT USA 732.41 VEHICLE PARTS 237784 053110 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 386.98 CITY OF EDINA 00002281 238038 87663128 -001 5620.6230 Council Check Register EDINBOROUGH PARK 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 732.41 335667 6/10/2010 335565 6/10/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 188.12 CIRCUIT BREAKER 00005781 237739 219314 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 188.12 SHIPPING CHARGE 237740 335566 6/10/2010 5913.6406 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. DISTRIBUTION 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Page- 26 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 386.98 LIFT INSPECTIONS 00002281 238038 87663128 -001 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 386.98 335667 6/10/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 14.12 SHIPPING CHARGE 237740 TRAN: 8990 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 14.12 335568 6/10/2010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 881.19 LOCATOR 00005784 237785 159433 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 881.19 336569 6/10/2010 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.27 PAGER 238091 T6096083E 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 13.27 335570 6/10/2010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 474.65 TOWELS, LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 238039 161632 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 262.81 LIQUOR BAGS 238040 161658 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 869.19 TISSUE, LINERS, TOWELS 00005606 238041 161855-00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,606.65 335571 6/10/2010 119454 VINOCOPIA 147.76 237872 0026448 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 389.28 237872 0026448 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 299.64 237873 0026447 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 836.68 335572 6/10/2010 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 285.25 237874 13577 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 285.25 335573 611012010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 382.83 LAMPS 00005411 237670 15154270 -00 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 48.22 LAMPS 00005569 237741 15155943 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 48.23 LAMPS 00005569 237741 15155943 -00 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/10/2010 = 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 479.28 335574 6/10/2010 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 269.33 GREER GARDEN POSTCARD 238042 35623 5110.6575 - PRINTING _ ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 269.33 335575 6/10/2010 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 100.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238043 060310 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 100.00 336676 6/10/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 951.21 237875 244130 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 669.90 237876 244132 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,881.45 237877 .243850 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 646.21 237878: 244126 -00 5822.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,148.77 335577 6/10/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 97.12- 237879 48584 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 858.37 237880 319832 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD. WINE 50TH ST SELLING 113.49 237881. 319833 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 364.48 237882 319878, 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 1,943.09 237883 319835 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 884.70 .237884 319836 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 333.60 237885 319834 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 73.12. 238123 317417BAL 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,473.73 335678 6110/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 842.33 237886 407780 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1 ,724.86 237887 407779 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,156.47 237888 407781 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.05 237889 407782 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX "YORK SELLING 4,926.98 237890 407784 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR. YORK SELLING 105.47 237891 407785 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS, SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,007.50 237892 405328, 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 80.65 237893 405329 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,271.39 237894 407773 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNOWSELLING 6,536.70 237895 407776 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,177.65 237896 407109 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON'SELLING 49.10 237897 407774 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,478.53 237898 407775 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 28 6/10/2010 - 6/1012010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 82.00 237899 407777 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 225.23- 237900 802363 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20.86- 237901 802375 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35.83- 237902 802374 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 69.30- 237903 802358 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107.95- 237904 802357 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 133.79 238124 404769 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 31,151.30 335579 6/10/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 43.20 237905 614072 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,354.50 237906 611363 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,542.65 237907 614071 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 44.00 237908 613786 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,086.40 237909 613785 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 5,285.56 237910 614052 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,635.15 237911 614800 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 237912 614801 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,297.70 237913 614824 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 160.00 237914 614826 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 321.00 237915 614825 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 434.80 238044 614020 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 60.00 238125 616156 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,244.95 238126 616155 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 108.00 238127 616849 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,011.05 238128 616848 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 32,693.46 335580 6/10/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 2,217.15 237916 248905 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,027.70 237917 248906 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 763.70 237918 248907 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,008.55 335582 6110/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 413.06 514827232 -6 237671 240299521 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 358.13 51- 5938955 -6 237672 240487589 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 145.16 51- 6229265 -9 237673 240494152 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,568.69 51- 6229265 -9 237673 240494152 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 484.48 51- 6046826 -0 237674 240491128 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,548.08 51- 5547446 -1 237675 240149671 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 29,928.93 514621797 -2 237676 240293776 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTINr 'ULAR R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Council Check Register Page - 29 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 56.86 51- 6692497 -0 237677 240171236 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN 1,228:58 51- 6223269 -1 237678 240161852 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,024.74 51- 5107681 -4 237679 240137572 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 373.83 51- 5634814 -2 237680 240482155 5934.6185 LIGHT &POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 4,465.28 51- 4966303 -6 237681 .240470979 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,497.65 51- 9011854 237742 -240225129 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 99.29 51- 5005454 -3 237743 240134382 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 75.05 51- 8526048 -8 237744 240200291 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET' LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 152.52 51 -6050184 -2 237745 240318169 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 67.38 - 51- 9422326 -6 237746. 240381148 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 141.87 51- 8987646 -8 237747 240369898 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 123.51 51- 9337452 -8 237748 240383970 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 32.29 51- 8976004 -9 237749 ,240370359 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 44.07 51- 6541084 -2 237750 240327604 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 33.53 51- 8102668 -0 237751 240353438 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 'STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 304.11 51- 8324712 -5 237752 240197676 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 34.88 51- 8997917 -7 237753 240207652 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 227.68 51- 9251919-0 237754 240214653 5650.6185. LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 33.42 51- 6892224 -5 237755 240175994 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,906.44 51- 9189085 -8 237756 240393296 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 201.19 51- 9603061.0 237786 240223843 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,794.20 51- 6227619 -3 238045 238644628 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 991.25 51- 5847121 -5 238092 241067321 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 15,019.28' 51- 4888627-1 238093 240978776 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 64,375.43 335583 6/10/2010 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 32.49 MAY USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00004322 237682 048155844 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 156.39• MAY USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 237683 048155845 1550.6151 f EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 111.63 MAY USAGE 238046 048155944 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 300.51 335584 6/10/2010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 920.01- DIESEL 00006404 238047 983536 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 458.10 GASOLINE 00006403 238048 983529 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - GOLF -CARS 1,000.95 _GASOLINE 00006403 238049 983533 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,379.06 335585 6/1012010 101672 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 1,757.03 BROOMS 00005793 237757 0128579 -IN 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 1,757.03 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/10/2010 — 6/10/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335586 611012010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 168.09 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008059 238050 54065981 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 366.38 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 238051 54166027 5631.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 534.47 335587 6/10/2010 101091 ZIEGLER ING 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 238094 E6395914 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 450.00 860,764.90 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 860,764.90 Total Payments 860,764.90 6/9/2010 9:32:42 Page - 30 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM _ z0000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 87,736.64 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,735.02 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 2,950.74 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2,997.84 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,925.07 05200 GOLF,DOME FUND 1,228.58 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 54,093.50 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 22,183.97 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 18,329.04 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND. 21,460.04 05800 LIQUOR FUND 209,425.49 05900 UTILITY FUND 421,899.35 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 373.83 05950 RECYCLING FUND 3,826.13 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 7,599.66 Report Totals 860,764.90 CITY 1. :NA Council Check Summary 6/10/2010 - 6/10/2010 6/i: 9:33:33 Page - 1 We confirm to the 1b est of our knowledge' and belief, that theso�dalms compirin all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing p ligi " and procedures date l o= 1a v i 0 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYML REGISTER 4/27/10 - 5/25/10 Card Holder Aerchan Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase.Discription Merchant Name Merchant City .. State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/04/30 $137.35 BRAIDED ROPE & HOOK JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/05/11 $100.00 POSTAGE JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/05/12 $135.76 SUMMER PARK PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/05/17 $104.12 SIGN FRAMES JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/05/18 $597.00 MEMBERSHIP JEFF LONG 2010/04/30 $89.01 USB FLASH DRIVE JEFF LONG 2010/04/30 $111.51 USB FLASH DRIVE JEFF LONG 2010/04/30 $124.15 TARGETS JEFF LONG 2010/05/01 $17.81 USB FLASH DRIVE JEFF LONG 2010/05/04 $161.97 HDTV STICK - DISPATCH JEFF LONG 2010/05/07 $35.61 USBIFLASH DRIVE JEFF LONG 2010/05/13 $35.79 COMPUTER CABLE JEFF LONG 2010/05/13 $10.00 EVENT REGISTRATION JEFF LONG 2010/05/13 $71.42 BOOSTER CABLES JEFF"LONG 2010/05/20 $9.43 FRAME JEFF LONG 2010/05/21 $337.83 TRAINING JEFF LONG 2010/05/21 $337.83 TRAINING JEFF LONG 2010/05/24 $3;432.63 16 CAMERAS FORSQUADS JOHN WALLIN 2010/04/27 $275.00 JOB POSTING JOHN WALLIN 2010/04/28 - $387.96 POWER BACKUP JOHN WALLIN 2010/04/28 $387.96 POWER BACKUP JOHN WALLIN 2010/04/30 $67.76 "BACKUP TAPES JOHN WALLIN 2010/05/04 $96.70 COUNCIL WORKSHOP JOHN WALLIN 2010/05/06 ($85.02) MEMBERSHIP. CHANGE JOHN WALLIN 2010/05/17 $6.04 COMPUTER CABLE JOHN WALLIN 2010/05/18 $121.73 COUNCIL WORKSHOP $7,107.35 STANCHION WORLD 800- 801 7691 FL 5631.6406 PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5610.6235 ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800- 2280475 NE 1624.6406 DISPLAYS.2 GO 800- 5722194. RI 1621.6513 NRPA, 703- 8580794 VA 1600.6105 MICRO - CENTER BETHEL RC 614- 326 -8500 OH, 1400.6160 MICRO CENTER #161 408- 919 -5400 CA 1400.61.60 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGI 800 - 7790182 MN 1400.6104 MICRO CENTER SAINT DAVI610- 989 -8400. PA 1400.6160 SYX *TIGERDIRECT.COM 800 -888 -4437 FL 1400.6160 MICRO CENTER BETHEL RC 614 - 326 -8500 OH 1400.6160 QCUSA 888 688 2188 888 - 688 -2188 FL 1400.6160 ZAPEVENT 612- 548 -5648 MN 1400.6406 AUTOZONE #3084 - RICHFIELD MN 1400.6406 OFFICE DEPOT #415 EDEN PRARIE MN "1400.6406 ASHFORD HOTEL HIGH POINT NC 1400.6104 ASHFORD HOTEL HIGH POINT '. NC 1400.6104 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHAI EDINA MN 1400.6406 INFOSOFT GROUP.INC 414 - 278 -0700 WI 1550.6121 WWW.NEWEGG.COM - 800 7390 -1119 CA 15842.6406 WWW.NEWEGG.COM , 800 - 390 -1119 CA 58626406 PRO TAPE COMM &'SUPPLY 512 - 4433911 TX 2210.6406 PAN ERA BREAD #1307 SAINT-LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 AMERICAN INST OF GRAPHI NEW YORK NY 2210.6105 MONOPRICE COM 909- 989 -6887 CA 1495.64.06 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN . 1100.6106 We confirm to the;best of.our knowledge and belief, that the- se. comply in all- material, respects with the requirements of the City. of Edina-.purchasing po 'c es and procedures d !o oe \�'.r ' i6se REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: JUNE 15, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Jackie Hooqenakker From: Dianne Plunkett Latham < Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 11:45 AM To: Kris Aaker; Jackie Hoogenakker; Arlene Forrest; Cary Teague; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter, Joyce Repya; Julie Risser; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer; Michael Schroeder; Nancy Nyrop Scherer; Stephen Brown Subject: FW: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace RECEIVED JUN 112010 6 -11 -10 Dear City of Edina Planning Commissioners, Please take into consideration the following when you receive requests for restaurants with wood burning fireplaces Dianne Plunkett Latham From: Dianne Plunkett Latham [mai Ito: Dianne. Plu n kett. Latham @Comcast. net] Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:26 AM To: Ann Swenson (SwensonAnnl @GMail.com); James B. Hovland (J Hovland @Kra useRollins.com); Joni Bennett (JoniBennettl2 @comcast.net); Mary Brindle (mbrindle @Comcast.net); Scot Housh (Scot.Housh @Willis.com) Subject: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace 5 -31 -10 Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has recently added a new step to the GreenStep Cities program, that of Local Air Quality. Due to the hazards of wood smoke to human health, to the global environment, and to our urban forest, the Air and Water Quality Working Group (AEWG) of the Energy and Environment Commission has been studying issues related to wood smoke. Although the AEWG report on wood smoke is not yet final, I am taking the opportunity to pass along some data on wood smoke, which AEWG member, Julie Mellum has provided. I am doing so because it is my understanding that at the June 1 City Council meeting, a local restaurant will be requesting having a two story wood burning fire place. I am writing to request that City Council disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. Gas inserts for indoor fireplaces and outdoor fire rings are safer and more environmentally sound then burning wood. Wood smoke: 1. Is hazardous to human health. 2. Is a major source of carbon dioxide and black carbon soot in our atmosphere. 3. Contributes to the spread of insect -borne tree disease, such as emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease. Human Health - Wood smoke emits fine particulates that contain many of the same deadly toxins that are in tobacco smoke and vehicle exhaust. They are comprised of formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, dioxins and other noxious and persistent organic pollutants that build up in our lungs, crops and water supply. Wood smoke is more concentrated than tobacco smoke, travels farther and remains chemically active in the body longer. Everyone is at risk from wood -smoke exposure. But children of all agesill, unborn children, the elderly, and anyone with asthma, allergies, or heart disease are in the highest -risk categories. The US Center for Disease Control states that wood smoke is a trigger for asthma attacks. Wood smoke is also implicated in cancers, reproductive birth defects and in sudden infant death syndrome. [Zi A study found that people who burn wood or other "biofuels" for heat or cooking may have a heightened risk of emphysema and related lung conditions. Among non - smokers, exposure to biomass smoke was linked to a 2.5 -fold increase in the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Smokers exposed to biomass smoke, meanwhile, had a more than four -fold greater risk of COPD than non - smokers who did not burn biomass fuels at home. l3) Minnesota's antismoking ordinance allows people to go to bars and restaurants and avoid smoke, because tobacco smoke has a proven harmful effects. Yet residents have no choice but to breathe outdoor air that smells of wood smoke in most neighborhoods and in public spaces —at all times of day, in all seasons. It can even enter homes through windows, vents and cracks. l41 Wood smoke interferes with the right to use and enjoy one's own property. Black Carbon Soot - The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to set limits on black carbon, Wa "soot." Generated from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, black carbon is a solid particle that warms the atmosphere because its dark color absorbs heat -- both when it accumulates in the air, raising the air's temperature, and when it lands on snow and ice, accelerating melting. Black carbon also has profound effects on public health, causing hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year.151 Forestry Issues - Gas fireplaces and gas fire rings reduce the number of trees that must be destroyed for fuel; trees help absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. The head of the United Nations Environment Program is pushing for measures to slash non - carbon dioxide greenhouse gas pollutants, including black carbon, . "because they make up some 50 percent of toxic atmospheric emissions ". He stressed that "The world must deploy all available means to reduce this pollution and that no substance contributing to this pollution should be overlooked." 161 The movement of firewood contributes to the spread of tree pathogens. Emerald ash borer will soon be killing trees in Edina. According to a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) document, "America's neighborhoods are under attack. The emerald ash borer lives in firewood. Move firewood and you spread the destruction. Reducing wood burning in Edina will reduce the use of firewood and thereby reduce the spread of emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease as well as any other pathogen that could be spread via firewood. In summary — Please disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. ill Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http: / /www.sciencedaily.com/ releases /2009/11/091106084243.htm. Z "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. 3 New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: /ibumingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?f-1 l &t =3497. 4 "Facts about burning wood; Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. 5 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/ news/ center /articles /2010 /los- angeles- times- 02 -22- 2010.html. 6 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org/apps/ news /story.asp ?NewsID = 31952 &Cr=unep &Crl). 7 Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Dianne Plunkett Latham Member Air and Water Quality Working Group Edina Energy and Environment Commission Jeffrey and Suzanne Pope RECEIVED 6621 Mohawk Trail JUN 1 1 2010 Edina, MN 55439 June 4, 2010 Mr. James B. Hovland Mayor - City of Edina 4801 W. 50`' Street. Edina, MN 55424 Dar Mr. Hovland: As residents of Edina --and people who want to live in Edina for many years to come - -we strongly urge you to SUPPORT The Waters Senior Living Center at Colonial Church. We are both approaching age 70, and it is becoming more difficult to live in our single family home in Edina. The Waters looks like the perfect place for us to stay in Edina when we leave our home. We've followed the objections to this development raised by some of the people in Countryside. It appears that Colonial has done a sincere and reasonable job of listening to the neighbors and responding to their concerns. We've seen the revised drawings — including the trees and Landscaping. The revised plans and drawings show the project to ft'remarkably well into the neighborhood and be much less visible than the most vocal neighbors portray. Edina needs a facility,like The Waters. There is nothing else-like it in Edina. We've had parents at other facilities in Edina, and we've visited friends elsewhere. None of the existing senior citizen facilities represent places we'd want to live. As things now stand, if The Waters isn't built, we'll surely move out of Edina when we sell our home. As prospective tenants, we want a future home with the amenities and environment that would be provided by The Waters. Many others in our age range feel the same way. Please give your'support to The Waters -and make it a much - needed reality for Edina. Sincerely, Jeffrey and Suzanne Pope + � v �D✓U^'°� ` - " "� vrL�� RECEIVED JUN 1 1 1010 a4 11 7 Uu- �-L �I o� 42 dD A6-t c -777 ej I�► � E Susan Howl subject: FW: CVS Pharmacy Proposal Attachments: Nov'09 Traffic Study.pdf RECEIVED JUN 1 1 1010 From: V Baumann [mailto:vbaumann @hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 12:34 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: CVS Pharmacy Proposal Geoff Workinger, Chairman Transportation Commission City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Workinger: The purpose of this letter is to address traffic concerns on Xerxes Avenue (between 69th - 70th Streets) given the CVS Pharmacy proposal. Ten years ago I moved into my home at 6913 Xerxes Avenue. At that time, it was a quiet residential neighborhood with minimal street traffic or noise. The Wells Fargo 2 -story building generated little traffic during business hours (only), Monday- Friday. In 2008 construction was started on a 4 -story apartment building on Xerxes Avenue. In June, 2009, construction was completed and tenants started moving into the building. The parking garage entrance is located directly on Xerxes Avenue. Since June, 2009, both traffic and noise have dramatically increased. In November, 2009, I requested that the City of Richfield Engineering Department conduct a traffic study over the course of 3 -days. I have attached a copy of this traffic study for your review. This report does indicate hourly traffic rates, corresponding speed, and both north and south bound traffic statistics. The study is based on vehicle traffic on Xerxes Avenue between 69th and 70th Streets only. On Thursday, November 5, 2009, total daily traffic was 784 vehicles while Friday, November 6, 2009, there were 1,401 vehicles. My expectation is that the traffic has increased since November given that the building had only been open for five months at that time. As you can imagine, the drastic increase in both traffic and noise have negatively affected the quality of life for the Richfield homeowners. My concern is that additional traffic will be routed onto Xerxes Avenue via the CVS Pharmacy lot. I am sure that most people would agree that 69th Street is already a very busy street. At the most recent Planning Commission meeting on May 26, comments were made that the traffic leaving CVS would, most likely, make a left -hand turn onto 69th Street or a U -turn at 69th /Xerxes should they want to go west. The current design indicates a right -out option only onto east -bound 69th street. Unless the plan has been revised, I don't know how it is possible to turn left with a right -out option. With all due respect, I doubt that most people will attempt a left -hand turn onto a busy street. For example, go to Walgreens and check out the difficulties of turning left onto east -bound 70th Street. I would suggest that CVS customers who want to go west will instead, make a right -hand turn (east) onto 69th Street, another right turn onto Xerxes (south) and yet another right 1 turn onto 70th Street to return to west -bound Edina locations. It is human nature to take the easiest route. This route will undoubtedly increase the current heavy traffic on Xerxes Avenue. I do have a second concern which is parking on Xerxes Avenue, between 69th and 70th Streets. There are a number of vehicles that currently park on Xerxes Avenue that are not related to the single - family homeowners. That is, contractors, guests, pizza delivery, taxis, and various other vehicles all use Xerxes Avenue (both sides of the street) as overflow parking for the apartment building. Approximately 25 cars use the guest parking lot (west side) for the apartment building on a regular basis. Should the CVS parking lot not be sufficient or overflow to the guest parking lot, then additional parking will be found on Xerxes Avenue by apartment building residents /guests, etc. It is my request that the design plan be revised to re -route traffic away from Xerxes Avenue as much as possible. A plan revision may include a left -turn only option. Adequate traffic studies were not conducted by the developer regarding the impact of the apartment building traffic on Xerxes Avenue. If that had taken place, then the end result would have been the same as when Cub Foods was built and there would have been no access from Xerxes Avenue to the apartment building parking garage. Many of the homeowners have lived here for many years and have enjoyed the proximity to Edina stores and restaurants. Now is the time to revise the CVS proposal so as to take into account the Richfield single - family homeowners and to not add to the already heavy traffic or parking on Xerxes Avenue. Sincerely, Vivian Baumann 6913 Xerxes Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Mobile: 612 - 702 -0707 vbaumann @hotmail.com Attachment: Richfield Traffic Study November 5 -7, 2009 Cc. Edina City Council Members Transportation Commission Members Planning.Commission Members The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy. Susan Howl Subject: FW: attn. Mayor and City Council members Re: Pinstripes RECEIVED From: Richard Speers [mailto:rspeers @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:55 AM JUN j 21110 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: attn. Mayor and City Council members Re: Pinstripes Mayor Hovland and Council Members- I am writing to follow up on the last Council meeting when I addressed the sound testing produced for the Pinstripes development at the north end of Centennial Lake.. I am not able to attend the next meeting but would like to make one or two points. First, I favor the Pinstripes proposal and the proposed chane for liquor sales at bowling establishments -with conditions. I believe it is appropriate to put conditions on Pinstripes because the building is part of a "commercial zone" that directly abutts a "recreational zone " - Centennial Park. These zones may not coincide with a zoning map, but nevertheless represent a seam where two uses - sometimes conflicting -meet each other. If Pinstripes were further away from this seam, I would not suggest conditions, but in this case I think it is appropriate to ask that sound be limited to the 65 Dba referred to in Pinstripes' own study. If you look at Pinstripes' website, you see the potential for live music which could possibly be louder than 65 Dba on certain occasions. So I'm suggesting that 65 be the limit for the spoken word, amplified music and live music when measured at the edge of the exterior balcony of the development. Thank you for your attention. Richard Speers 703 Coventry Lane Susan Howl Subject: FW: RECEIVED >Dear: Mayor James Hovland > Council Member Joni Bennett >Council Member Mary Brindle >Council Member Scot Housh >Council Member Ann Swenson >City Manager Gordon Hughes On behalf of the Pinstripes Team, I want to thank the Council Members and Mayor for their support last night in amending the ordinance to allow us to proceed with our exciting plans to join the Edina community. I genuinely appreciate all the time and efforts on your part in studying and reviewing the various issues, and we continue to look forward to working together with the City as we formalize our building plans and make preparations to open. Again, thank you, and I look forward as well to an enjoyable Grand Opening celebration at Pinstripes Edina sometime soon! Dale Schwartz Pinstripes, Inc. Cc: Kirk Williams Cary Teague Gordon Hughes i -- Original Message---- - From: Arnold Bigbee [mailto:arniebl@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 10:46 AM To: Susan Howl Subject: Photos to forward to the Mayor's secretary Susan, there are two photos I took last Sunday when my wife and I visited the Pinstripes restaurant location in suburban Chicago. I visited w /Mayor Hovland Tuesday evening and he is expecting these along with other information I will drop off at City Hall later today. I will send the photos in two separate a -mails coming to you next. Thank you. Arnie Subject: Fwd: photo showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area Begin forwarded message: From: arniebl < arniebl me.com> Date: June 8, 2010 2:22:24 PM CDT To: Bigbee Arnold <arniebl me.com> Subject: Fwd: photo showing windows in bowling area Begin forwarded message: From: arniebl < arniebl me.com> Date: June 8, 2010 2:21:56 PM CDT To: Bigbee Arnold <arniebl Oa me.com> Subject summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes - please forward to Mayor Jim, my wife and I visited the Pinstripes location in a suburban development on Higgins Rd. in South Barrington. The food and service were excellent. We dined outside and I noticed that the sound system had speakers attached to each large umbrella over the outdoor tables. We had no sound interference with our meal conversation. The bocce ball outdoor courts (about 30 feet from us) were being used but we noticed no noise from those courts. The bowling alleys were separated from the restaurant by a 10 - 12 foot wide opening that was able to be closed off w /sliding doors. There were many families in the facility eating and playing. The decor is "upscale" with lots of art on the walls and tile and hardwood flooring. There were many small dining areas, each w/8 -15 tables. There were also 4 -6 smaller rooms for groups of up to 15 for birthday parties and other gatherings. The ballroom seating up to 300 was on the second floor. We saw one fire pit which was not active during our visit. The facility did not have a "sports bar" feel or sound nor did we see the clientele one would expect to see at a sports bar (i.e., groups of people cheering while watching sports contests on large screen tv's). We were favorably impressed with the operation as a family food and fun destination. I also need to share that, although Pinstripes offered to compliment our meals, I declined that offer and paid for our meals. My wife and I believe that Pinstripes would be a good neighbor in Centennial Lakes if other neighborhood concerns can be addressed. I have sent a few photographs to you via Susan and will leave menus and other material from Pinstripes at your office on Wed afternoon. Please call me if you have any questions I can answer. Arnie Susan Howl Subject: FW: Liquor and Gaming at Centennial Lakes RECEIVED JUN 0 7 20?� From: Ray DeMont [mai Ito: raydemont @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 1:46 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Liquor and Gaming at Centennial Lakes Dear Mayor and Council Members: You were very thorough in your discussions of the noise issue as it relates to Pinstripes at your meeting last week. If you are indeed able to enforce glass enclosures without sliding glass doors to open, you will no doubt control the issue of noise. But, make no mistake, a door left open will produce the sound of crashing bowling balls and pins in any bowling alley. The idea you can sit at the bar at Pinstripes and not hear this, is an insult to your intelligence. My concern, as I wrote to you in the past, is changing our Ordinance to allow Liquor and Gaming. Fine Dining Restaurants are done serving by 10 PM. The current trend to add gaming is to extend the hours for more opportunity to sell liquor, not food. Your Predecessors on the Council were smart enough to recognize the difference. A Restaurant will not meet the 60% requirement for food sales only, and, in fact, will become a Bar after 10 P.M. If this Council changes our Ordinance to allow Liquor and Gaming, particularly at Edina's Premier Park where you have also allowed building with zero setback from the park, I will submit this Council will forever be recognized as the group to destroy the concept of controlled liquor sales in Edina; and perhaps, even Centennial Lakes Park as we know it today. If you still believe in Liquor and Gaming, I beg you to open the discussion to the Residents' of the City at Large. They are open to Liquor with Fine Dining only, but you won't make many friends suggesting we should now allow Bars in Edina. Ray DeMont 7400 Edinborough Way #5308 Edina, MN 55435 952- 941 -6896 The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy. 4REALESTATE BROKERAGE June 5, 2010 Edina City Council James Hovland, Mayor Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Scot Housh Ann Swenson City Manager Gordon Hughes City Planner Cary Teague RECEIVED jUN 0 7 2010 Subject: Proposed Pinstripes "Bowling/Bocce/Bistro" on Centennial Lakes. I want to take the time to thank you for your decision on the Pinstripes first reading. I am sure that you hear input on these issues and there is never a follow -up thank you. I many times think it would be fun to be in the political arena until I go to these meeting and watch you patiently listen to points of view be repeated and have people be so serious over issues that don't make a hill of beans. I thank you for your patience. I think you will be happy with your decision. I walked around the lake last night and there was a full compliment of people dining at the Macaroni grill and not only could I not hear anything from across the lake but there was no noise when I got right in front of their patio. There also seemed to be a fireplace someplace burning, perhaps at the Centrum and it was a quite pleasant smell. Hardly a liability to the community. Ag ' thank you. VJayn Carlson 523 entry Wayne L. Carlson, President waynecarlson@popp.net 7400 Metro Blvd #213 Edina, Minnesota 55439 Phone 952- 844 -0500 Fax 952 -844 -9078 Susan Howl Subject: FW: RECEIVED JUN - 1121010 >Dear: Mayor James Hovland > Council Member Joni Bennett >Council Member Mary Brindle >Council Member Scot Housh >Council Member Ann Swenson >City Manager Gordon Hughes On behalf of the Pinstripes Team, I want to thank the Council Members and Mayor for their support last night in amending the ordinance to allow us to proceed with our exciting plans to join the Edina community. I genuinely appreciate all the time and efforts on your part in studying and reviewing the various issues, and we continue to look forward to working together with the City as we formalize our building plans and make preparations to open. Again, thank you, and I look forward as well to an enjoyable Grand Opening celebration at Pinstripes Edina sometime soon! Dale Schwartz Pinstripes, Inc. Cc: Kirk Williams Cary Teague Gordon Hughes Susan Howl Subject: FW: Liquor and Gaming at Centennial Lakes RECEIVED JUN 0 7 2010 From: Ray DeMont [mailto:raydemont @hotmaii.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 1:46 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Liquor and Gaming at Centennial Lakes Dear Mayor and Council Members: You were very thorough in your discussions of the noise issue as it relates to Pinstripes at your meeting last week. If you are indeed able to enforce glass enclosures without sliding glass doors to open, you will no doubt control the issue of noise. But, make no mistake, a door left open will produce the sound of crashing bowling balls and pins in any bowling alley. The idea you can sit at the bar at Pinstripes and not hear this, is an insult to your intelligence. My concern, as I wrote to you in the past, is changing our Ordinance to allow Liquor and Gaming. Fine Dining Restaurants are done serving by 10 PM. The current trend to add gaming is to extend the hours for more opportunity to sell liquor, not food. Your Predecessors on the Council were smart enough to recognize the difference. A Restaurant will not meet the 60% requirement for food sales only, and, in fact, will become a Bar after 10 P.M. If this Council changes our Ordinance to allow Liquor and Gaming, particularly at Edina's Premier Park where you have also allowed building with zero setback from the park, I will submit this Council will forever be recognized as the group to destroy the concept of controlled liquor sales in Edina; and perhaps, even Centennial Lakes Park as we know it today. If you still believe in Liquor and Gaming, I beg you to open the discussion to the Residents' of the City at Large. They are open to Liquor with Fine Dining only, but you won't make many friends suggesting we should now allow Bars in Edina. Ray DeMont 7400 Edinborough Way #5308 Edina, MN 55435 952 - 941 -6896 The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy. 7MERICAN ACLU CIV IL LIBERTIES UNION OTA June 7, 2010 Mayor Jim Hovland and the City of Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, RECEIVED JUN 10 1010 AMERICAN CIVIL On behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, I would like to applaud LIBERTIES UNION OF the City of Edina for creating a domestic partners registry. We are pleased to see Edina MINNESOTA 450 NORTH SYNDICATE take a leadership position on this issue. All families deserve equal treatment under e SUITE 325 law, and this registry will help to make that possible. SAINT PAUL. MN 55104 7/651.645.4097 F/651.647.5948 Thy you for the recognition of the commitment of same sex couples that this registry SUPPORTfdACLU- MN.ORG WWW.ACLU- MN.ORG will create, and for being the first suburb of Minneapolis to take this step. Sincerely, d� V Charles Samuelson Executive Director ® cuu RECEIVED Jonathan Vlaming JUN 10 2010 Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth MN 55441 -1299 June 7, 2010 Re: Objection to Community Assessment Process Dear Mr. Vlaming, The members of the Community Assessment Team ( "CAT ") who have signed this letter are writing to protest the process Three Rivers Park District has used to obtain input from the residents of Edina on the proposed Regional Trail System. As you know, CAT is comprised of 11 representatives (and others) elected by the residents of each trail segment originally proposed as possible routes for the trail. We are volunteers who have devoted substantial time and effort to provide ideas and facts to the Park District. We understand that that information will be submitted to the City Council to be considered in the Council's decision on whether and where such a trail system will be located. As a result of recent actions by the Park District we believe that the integrity of the process of gathering ideas and information from and by CAT has been destroyed. As a result, we will not support or endorse any findings or conclusions made by the Park District or submitted to the City Council unless the CAT is allowed to review all relevant information as promised and is granted further input. The most significant event that caused us to reach this conclusion is that the Park District changed the "rules of the game" after the game has been played but before the outcome has been decided. At the first meeting of CAT in December 2009, we were told that our role was to provide a list of "pro's" and "con's" (now called items) that the Park District would "quantify" and submit to the City Council. We were expressly told that we could consider only those routes identified on a map given to all of us. We were told we could not consider any other possible alternative routes. That directive was repeated at several meetings in response to our concerns for its limiting effect. Most recently, however, at our meeting on May 17, we were told that the Park District had developed a new, alternative route (route 5F) that had never been given to us for consideration before. It had never appeared on any prior map, and, to the best of our knowledge, no citizen representative had ever been given opportunity for input. We believe that the new route has not been evaluated environmentally and will not appear in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet under preparation. Many of us have other objections to the Park District's process that will be addressed by individual CAT members. Because of this change in the process, and other, more individual reasons, we believe that the results of this process cannot be fair and representative of the Citizens of Edina's concerns. Therefore, we will not endorse any submission by the Park District resulting from the process as is. We are committed to bringing forward a fair framework in which to reach a conclusion desired by the residents of Edina. To that end, we feel that the CAT should not be disbanded but should continue to work with Three Rivers Park District to consider all options. Cc: Mayor James Hovland and Edina City Council Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners Richard Johnso ection 1 � Robert Lubar Section 2 Robert Schwartzbauer Section 3 Reid Kilberg Section 4 =onMichael Wolff -ge' ction 8 Peter McCarthy Section 11 RECEIVED JUN 10 2010 June 9, 2010 Dear Mayor Hovland, My name is Jeff Scott, and I am a long time member of Colonial Church of Edina. I am writing in support of the Waters Senior Housing project being developed by Shelter Corporation on Colonial property behind the Fire Station at Tracy and the Crosstown. As a deacon at Colonial church, who visits seniors each month for the church, I think I can provide a little different perspective on this project. This project is very similar to The Colony, also developed by Shelter Corporation, near the Eden Prairie Center. It is first class in design and amenities, and is a graduated care facility. It is very much like the Friendship Village complex in Bloomington ... and both of these facilities have many Colonial members. When I visit these people, regardless of their health, they can't say enough good things about the facility and the care they receive. They have real peace of mind, because as their health deteriorates they know that they will receive the appropriate care, and will not be forced to move. They also appreciate the area they live in, because it is very close to where they used to live ... which is comforting. From the standpoint of Edina this seems like a win -win situation. With over 20% of your population over 65 years of age the need for such a facility ... right near where they currently live ... seems to be great. In addition, it will be first class ...with lots of amenities ... something your constituents will be looking for. With the graduated care feature couples will be especially interested, for as one person declines the other person could still live independently in the same facility while their spouse got extended care. My parents had this situation in Florida when they had to move out of a gated community on a golf course when my stepfather's health started to slowly go down hill. Living 1500 miles away you don't know how good it made me feel to know that they would only need to move once, and that my mom and her husband would get good care and have a nice place to live for the rest of their life ... regardless of what happened to either of them. Practically speaking, for a city with an aging population, as seniors move into Waters that opens up homes for younger families. To maintain high quality schools you need an ongoing supply of kids ... and this could really help that situation down the road. Colonial has been a very good neighbor, holding over 15 hours of "listening sessions" with a very spirited group of neighbors. Based on those sessions the building has been scaled down to three stories from the original four. The number of units has been reduced from 150 to 139 ... and the roof design has been modified to look more residential. Additional landscaping and trees have also been added. I really feel that the Waters Senior Housing Community will be a real plus for Edina, and I hope that you encourage the City Council and the Planning Commission to support it. Sincerely, Cit►� Jeff Scott Mayor Jim Hovland RECEIVED Planning Commisioner Steve Brown JUN 0 9 2010 Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jim and Steve: My wife and I have been Edina homeowners for more than 25 years. As senior citizens who wish to continue to live in Edina, we are excited about the proposed Waters Senior Center to be built behind the fire station. We downsized 15 years ago, selling our Edina home, and moved to the condo building at 50th and Halifax. Our next move would be to Friendship Village or The Colony, thereby leaving Edina, which is our home and where we wish to remain. The Waters Center has all the care facilities, nursing, memory, etc. that we will need in the coming years. It has an affordable price that allows us to stay as residents of Edina. We even put our names on a waiting list to be able to move there. Our understanding is that the building plan has been modified to meet the concerns of local neighbors and the new plan looks good to us. We heartily endorse this new senior center and ask the City of Edina to approve it. Ron and Carole Dobies 5000 Halifax Ave South #307 Edina, MN 55424 June 5, 2010 Mayor Hovlund and. City Council City. Hall 4801 West 50�, Street. Edina, MN, 55436 Mr. Mayor If you have ever had to take the car key's away from your parents forever, you know what a traumatic experience that can be. You are in effect causinthem d to Ibe quit by isolated in their home without the prospect of that changing• y looking for a care facility for her parents in their home town 100 miles NW. of here and found that the waiting lists were one year out. We needed a facility closer to our home in Edina and we needed it fairly soon. We found space at St. Teresa in Hopkins, but they are not Catholic and felt somewhat like outsiders. When space was available some o the later at the Edenbourough complex we moved them there. They eventually g point that they needed full time nursing care and we had to move them again. We certainly would have appreciated having an have felt living oser affiliation two miles of our house and with a church that they could I understand that you -have a responsibility to weigh various community interests, and .make the best decision for the community as a whole. The proposed facility on the site near: Colonial Church seems to us to be an appropriate use for the land. it, wouldave for our parents, but I am sure there are other residents of our community very much value and appreciate such a facilifew years down the road ourselves. a will probably be candidates for such a residence Y Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Man/ . av��- Robert and Susan e 6800 Paiute Drive Edina, Minn 55439 RECEIVED June 6, 2010 JUN 0 9 2010 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, We are writing in support of The Waters Senior Housing Community on the campus of Colonial Church. We are both 1971 graduates. of Edina High School, currently Bloomington residents. We would strongly consider this facility in the future. For the immediate future one set of parents will be moving back to Minnesota from Wisconsin and are interested in this community having lived not far away, on Creel- Drive for 2G years in the 60t and 7Os. The idea of having housing that will adapt to our needs and our parents needs as we age is very comforting. The area is lovely and having Colonial Church right there is wonderful. Please approve the building of The Waters Senior Living Center. Anne and David Westman 10712 Garden Circle, Bloomington, MN 952- 941 -2779 westmom @earthlink.net Ron Randall RECEIVED 5565 West 70th Street JUN 0 9 2010 Edina, MN 55439 June 7,2010 The Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 5Oh Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Council Members: I have resided at this address since August the ti and have e b church member of Colonial Church since 1970. At signed the contract with Shelter Corporation I was the President of our Church Foundation as as such was the person to sign for Colonial. So, I am intimately familiar with the project and with the process that has been ongoing. In an earlier e-mail to my neighbor Jim Hovland I stressed the great hope we at Colonial hold for this new senior housing project. Edina has g of this quality to offer at this time and a bonus feature is the expected inclusion of a number of low income housing units in the center. The land was lying unused and off the city tax rolls. Edina. ow it will be ry y occupied and there will be tax income fo I attended all of the "listening" sessions that were held at Colonial Church for the benefit of the neighbors. My characterization of those session s was "grandstanding" and "venting" on the part of the neighborhood association. In my mind there was not a single legitimate eo concern who will by these neighbors. l don't believe thantheart of the project yet there was is a single have more than an obscured view of any p ranting about how the scope of the project would change the character of the neighborhood. This is the same message that the same group delivered in the 197Os when the original plans for Colonial Church were presented. The two ring leaders of the neighborhood group are even the same two individuals who were so vocal at that time. At the time that the church was built the neighborhood group managed to force the church to spend $100,000 plus to build birms along Olinger Boulevard. A few years later the same association approached the church complaining that the birms blocked their view of the church. Now the group seems to be succeeding in reducing the scope of uc very carefully designed structure under the premise a their view. Unfortunately, reducing the number of units will reduce the capacity of the facility and will mean less tax revenue for Edina and certainly fewer low income units in the building. It will also be difficult to justify the same level of amenities in a smaller project. I won't even dignify the remarks about nine foot ceilings and granite countertops by commenting on their inappropriateness, also, the suggestion that The Rivers management should post a bond against the cost of possible search and rescue operations in case an elderly resident "escapes" from the facility. After the last inflammatory letter to the Church from the association's attorney (in which he suggested that the significant appeasing modifications to the plan which have been offered were erinadequate) el I he wrote an e-mail to Ted Yoch, who has poured be p art of three years into this work. I told Ted that if I were in his shoes I would go back to the original plan and ask the Council toapprove and would as originally ally presented. It makes more sense in the original format better for the community and for Colonial Church. Thank you for taking time to read this letter. It is my personal opportunity to do a little "venting ". Sincerely, Ron Randall Susan Howl ubject: FW: senior housing RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2010 From: R P CLEMMER [mailto:rpclemmer @msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Steve.Brown @northmarq.com Subject: senior housing We are writing in support of "the Waters" senior housing proposal. We are members of Colonial Church and are excited about the plans for senior housing on the land between the church and the fire station. Several people we know have expressed interest in living there in the future. We feel that there wil be many other seniors in Edina that will find this an attactive alternative. We've looked at pictures of the building, which we think will add character to the neighborhood. With all the trees and other buildings, it will not be very visible to the neighborhood; but the times and places it will be seen, we think it will be pleasant to look at. This is 'a great location for senior living, less than a block from the Crosstown, which will take most of the traffic. The traffic impact on the neighborhood would be minimal. Dick and Pat Clemmer 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Countryside Neighborhood From: Michelle Lohrding [mailto:m.lohrding @earthlink.net] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:30 PM JUN U y ZUIU To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Countryside Neighborhood June 8th, 2010 Dear City Council Members — I am writing to you in regards to the proposed housing development in the Countryside neighborhood. As a young family in Edina it saddens us that you do not recognize our neighborhood as a cherished place and that the addition of such a development will not maintain this. I would like to be made aware of other Edina neighborhoods that have single family housing with in proximity to such an enormous complex. I don't believe it exists, so why experiment now. Considering that the school board is always struggling to get bonds and levy's passed because a very, very large percentage of Edina residents don't have children at home anymore. I wonder why the choice to add more housing for persons without kids is being considered. We all know that the Edina schools have been keeping our housing market afloat in these economic down times. So, let me ask you why not propose that Colonial Church highly consider single family homes that would add to the balance needed to keep our schools alive and the city of Edina on top for its recognition of being the best place to live. Another consideration ... our roads in Edina are already congested and the proposal of this massive development will add substantial traffic to an already heavy used thorough -fair for our cities only high school, 1 elementary, 1 middle school and interchange of Highway 62. Truly, it seems a decision like this will only make Edina neighborhoods unattractive with the increase of traffic and congestion. Please consider putting the best of our community and neighborhood first and not the gain of a dollar! Regards, Michelle Lohrding Susan Howl Subject: FW: proposed bike trail RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2010 From: marmomom @comcast.net [mailto :marmomom @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:12 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: proposed bike trail have become increasingly aware of the tentative plans for a bike trail through Edina. While I understand the desire for bike trails in and around the Twin Cities, I am opposed to allowing a trail to go through the quiet and peaceful neighborhoods of Edina. Specifically, I am opposed to the trail winding its way through Walnut Ridge Park. We are a quiet neighborhood, and we paid a high price for our homes to be in an area that was not near the busyness of schools and churches and other public buildings. Surely our homes will decrease in value if a paved trail is put into the proposed area, _not to mention added noise and possibly congested spaces. Mairlyn C. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Seven mile bicycle trail through Edina RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2010 From: Gwen Hankinson [mailto:gwenhankl @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 9:47 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Seven mile bicycle trail through Edina To Whom It May Concern, We are writing to express our GREAT concern with unnecessary spending on a bike trail through our neighborhoods and community of Edina. It is pure craziness to take on more debt in today's economic climate. This bike path is not an investment in Edina, but a door opening to outside residents (non tax paying) to come through our neighborhoods and use a path that they are not paying for in construction or future maintenance. Let's not forget the invitation it creates for safety issues!!!! The path running through Walnut_Ridge Park will expose so many young children to unsafe conditions. Have you even considered this aspect ?!! Hundreds of Edina children use that park for La Crosse practice & games, playing on eqpipment, biking and rollerblading, etc., without the huge worry of added traffic coming from outside of Edina. We would not feel that the safety of children are insured with exposing them to so many more people coming through our neighborhood! Whose best interest does this bike path really cater to? It sounds like a select few who don't even live in Edina. This is an established community, not one that is being newly developed with a bike path in mind. Please allow Edina residents to be heard and accounted for in this decision. It negatively impacts us the most through added on community debt and hazardous safety issues! Sincerely, Ben and Gwen Hankinson 6515 Biscayne Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl subject: FW: Waters Senior Living Project From: RayVoss @aol.com [mailto:RayVoss @ aol.com] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 7:54 PM JUN 0 J 2010 To: Lynette Biunno Cc: barbarahoganson @comcast.net Subject: Waters Senior Living Project Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Re: Concerns regarding the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation's Waters Senior Living Project Honorable Mayor Hovland and Respected Council Members: SUMMARY: I am writing to urge you to either reject the proposed so- called Waters Senior Living Project on Colonial Drive in its entirety or postpone indefinitely any decision regarding this project until Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation significantly modify the project to bring it in line with the character of the Countryside Neighborhood. Either return to a development suitable for the original R -1 zoning, or make a small, incremental accommodation in zoning similar in size, style and scope to the townhouses on the other side of Colonial Church. BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: I've lived in the Countryside Neighborhood since 1981 across from Countryside Elementary School and, except for the new fire station, expansion of Good Samaritan Methodist Church and the remodeling of some of the homes, the complexion of the neighborhood has remained unchanged during that time period. During the year plus process of the City's recent recasting of its Comprehensive Plan, I attended some of the community meetings and, at no time did I see a proposal presented which indicated any intent on the part of the City to make such a major change in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for this area. Imagine my surprise when I returned home this spring from a six month RV trip to learn of the massive Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation's plans for the high cost, commercial Waters Senior Living Project. And, to learn that in just 45 days you folks had given initial approval to both modifying the Comprehensive Plan and amending the Zoning ordinance from R -1 to drop what I understand is now a four level, 600 ft. long, 44 ft. high, 139 unit commercial, high cost senior housing project right across from one of the two parks in our neighborhood! To be clear, I am NOT against Colonial Church developing its property, nor am I against affordable senior housing, but I've looked at what I understand is the most recent concept plan for this project and it just does not fit the neighborhood. It doesn't meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan to Protect and Preserve the Essential Character of the Existing Residential Neighborhood nor is it a Development Project that Complements the Area and the Neighborhood. There are concept drawings illustrating views which purport to show the building obscured by vegetation, but these are new trees that won't reach the illustrated size for 20 -30 years! In the meantime, most of the existing beautiful trees on the site will be destroyed. The other illustrated views from the north and northwest, including from the park, show this large building will never be obscured by trees! While I don't have any traffic studies, clearly adding 139 units of senior assisted living will add significantly to the traffic in the area with staff coming and going 24/7, residents making their trips and visitors coming to see friends and relatives. Certainly much more traffic than was contemplated by the R -1 zoning! I would also suspect that a building of this size will also add a significant burden to the existing infrastructure of sewer and water service as well as electric, telephone and cable utilities to serve the residents. A much smaller project, perhaps on the scale of the condominium units on the other side of Colonial Church would fit in nicely, if the Church and the City decided that the original R -1 zoning was no longer appropriate. Such a development could be one or two story apartments or townhouses and, if they wanted to serve the senior population, could be non- profit senior living apartments or a senior cooperative, perhaps serving 50 -70 seniors. On the other hand, Colonial Church and the Countryside Community members have lived with what has been the existing R -1 zoning for many years with no objections to that status. So what has changed that justifies any change in zoning? There have been no other developments in the area which support a change in zoning. The only "change" evident is that Colonial Church has decided it wants to make as much money off the property now and in the future as it can! Now I can't fault the Church for "trying to make a buck "! But for the same reason that I can't convert my house to a neighborhood store to serve the people coming to Countryside School across the street, Colonial Church shouldn't be allowed to convert its R -1 property to such a large, non - conforming commercial entity! As I understand it, they are not even proposing "affordable" senior housing. The precedents that will be set if this project is approved as proposed pose real problems for the future, not only for the Countryside Neighborhood but for all single family (R -1) neighborhoods in the City: (1) Amending the Comprehensive Plan in such a short period of time without larger notice to and participation by the Neighborhood and the rest of the community (at least I did not receive any notice), after the City spent considerable time and money with the community at -large recasting the Comprehensive Plan is an inappropriate precedent for the handling of future proposals in R -1 areas of the City. Years ago, I served on a small city's planning commission and I've watched many other cities in the Twin Cities and elsewhere administer their Comprehensive Plans, and none would have thought of amending their Plans so quickly without soliciting input from the entire community. (2) Amending the Zoning ordinance from R -1 to allow such a large, commercial venture to be plopped down in an entirely R -1 area is what many call derisively spot zoning". It sets a bad precedent that other churches or property owners in R -1 areas may wish to follow to the detriment of the residential areas throughout Edina. (Good Samaritan Methodist Church is but one block away from my home and while I'm comfortable with'their existing building and operations, if this Colonial Church project is approved, they could easily decide someday to purchase the adjoining single family residences and propose a commercial development as well, for example. If this project is approved, so could all the other churches nestled in the R -1 residential areas of the City.) So, as I said at the outset, please either disapprove this project in its entirety, or defer action until Colonial Church and Shelter Corp. reduce its size and scope to fit the character of the Countryside Neighborhood. I don't think this is an unreasonable request. Sincerely, Raymond Voss Mailing address: 5021 Vernon Ave. So. #312 Edina, Minnesota 55436 Residence address: 5716 Benton Ave. Edina, Minnesota 55436 952 - 927 -0448 rayvoss(o)-aol.com cc: Barbara Hoganson Susan Howl Subject: FW: Congratulations! From: jackiesmo @aol.com [mailto:jackiesmo @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:05 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Congratulations! To all who made it happen: RECEIVED JUN 0 81010 I just wanted to thank everyone in edina who had the courage and decency to recognize that people in a same sex union deserve the same rights as those in heterosexual pairs. I give you all a standing ovation for taking this step and hope that your leadership in this is followed by many other cities in Minnesota. Thank you! Thank you! Thank You! Sincerely, Jackie Smolen Susan Howl Subject: FK proposed bike trail RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2010 From: marmomom @comcast.net [mailto:marmomom @ comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:12 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: proposed bike trail I have become increasingly aware of the tentative plans for a bike trail through Edina. While I understand the desire for bike trails in and around the Twin Cities, I am opposed to allowing a trail to go through the quiet and peaceful neighborhoods of Edina. Specifically, I am opposed to the trail winding its way through Walnut Ridge Park. We are a quiet neighborhood, and we paid a high price for our homes to be in an area that was not near the busyness of schools and churches and other public buildings. Surely our homes will decrease in value if a paved trail is put into the proposed area, not to mention added noise and possibly congested spaces. Mairlyn C. RECEIVED RASMUS LAW OFFICE, LLC JUN 0 7 1010 333 South Th Street, Suite 3020 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel (612) 746 -0321 drasmus@rasmuslaw.net Fax (612) 871 -3215 Tune 1, 2010 Via Certirled Mail Mr. Jay Jensen Shelter Corporation 1600 Hopkins Crossroads Minnetonka, MN 55305 Mr. Ted Yoch c/o Colonial Church 6200 Colonial Way 17,dina, Minnesota 55436 RE: Waters Senior Living at Colonial Church Dear Mr. Jensen and Mr. Yoch: 'This follows the meeting at Colonial Church on May 20, and the submission on May 28 of the final application for the Waters Senior Living Development at Colonial Church. First, I want to thank you for the hospitality you. extended to the Countryside Neighborhood Group at the meeting on May 20. 1 know members of the group appreciate the spirit in which you explained the changes to the project following the comments received at the community input meetings in April. 'rhe group also appreciates your efforts to make changes to the project based on the comments you received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front fagade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the majority of the Countryside residents 1 represent remain dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and syrnmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit: enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot profit - center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood, one that currently does not have any small -scale economic activity The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the Countryside Neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their Jay Jensen/Ted Yocli Letter June 1, 2010 Page 2 of 2 neighborhood when they purchased.. their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building — i.e .,139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The proposed building is similar mass and scope to Valley View Middle School and three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one -point I want make very clear: the Countryside residents are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non - profit senior housing project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that you enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Countryside Neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you, and receiving an invitation for my clients to continue their dialogue with you on these important matters. Sincerely, RAS A E, LLC Dan Rasmus Attorney at Law Cc: Edina City Council Members Edina Planning Commission Members Susan Howl Subject: FW: Domestic partnership Registry RECEIVED JUN 0 7 1010 From: Nicolai Lewis [mailto:lewis— na @earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 5:58 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Domestic partnership Registry As an Edina resident, I was very proud of my city this morning when I read about our city council's unanimous adoption of a domestic partnership registry — first suburb in MN to do sol Thank you for showing the same strong and intelligent leadership in this area that you consistently exhibit in the management of this well -run city. Nikki Lewis Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Living Center RECEIVED JUN 0 7 1010 From: Don Klassy [mailto:dfkmlk55 @msn.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 5:08 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Living Center Mayor Jim Hovland, City of Edina Planning Commission Chair, Steve Brown, City of Edina Dear Sirs: Wanted to take just a few minutes to contact you and urge your support of the Waters Senior Living Center in Edina. We are both long -time members of Colonial Church and live in Minnetonka. We are looking forward to the Waters project being constructed in Edina, and realize there is an expectation that we can spend our senior years in The Waters. This facility will provide a great opportunity to attract a large network of volunteers from Colonial Church to assist in the daily operation of The Waters. Based upon the demographics of which we are aware, there is a great need in Edina for this type of senior housing, and again we urge you to approve the project. Sincerely, Donald F. and Mary Lou Klassy, Colonial Members since 1985 Susan Howl subject: FW: Thank you, City of Edina RECEIVED JUN 0 7 1010 From: Ann & David Braden [mailto:dbbraden @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 9:01 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thank you, City of Edina I just read in the Star Tribune that the city of Edina is the first suburb to register gay partners. While this doesn't affect us directly, my husband and I appreciate what this means for our gay and lesbian neighbors. We're proud to live in Edina! Ann and David Braden 5137 Tifton Drive Edina, MN 55439 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 8:43 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Housing RECEIVED JUN 01 2010 Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: LARRY VENABLE [mailto:larryvenable @msn.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 6:29 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Housing To Edina City Council: I have recently become aware of the Waters Senior Housing project near Colonial Church. I am writing to urge the council to approve the project if not already. I am 77, have had residence in Edina for 43 years, my three children graduated from Edina High School. Currently I spend winters in Florida, but maintain my condo at Windwood of Edina. I was a member at Colonial Church for many years, have attended the Friday morning renewal meetings there since 1983. My point is that I have many friends in the approximate age group that would be candidates for the Waters, and it would be an ideal place for me as I plan my future. As I get older, and my health starts to deteriorate, I do not plan to live in Florida and will return to Minnesota full time because all of my children and grandchildren are Minnesota residents. Please approve this project. Thanks for listening. Lawrence Venable 7500 Cahill Road, #223C Edina, MN 55439 � �� t` � , � r i i. J ��.�� q4� Elko Tom CX+ zv� 5e('y 4-11 + ni5�1+ VVI456 OtA-V- OIP 2 Yr on+A 6 I/vo4.. JD; 4-61,- 1,4y' Susan Howl subject: FW: Thank you to City Council Members RECEIVED 1UH 011010 From: Jane Levin [mailto:jjkiwi @gmaii.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 2:41 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thank you to City Council Members Dear Edina City Council Members: My partner Dr.Judy Reisman and I have lived in Edina for 17 years. We both had tears in our eyes last night as the Council voted unanimously to enact a domestic partner ordinance for the City of Edina. This act means more to us than I can express. Thank you so very much. Sincerely, Dr. Jane Levin 4235 Alden Dr. Edina 55416 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Human Rights RECEIVED JUN 022010 From: Tom and Darlene White [mailto:tdwhite62 @earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 9:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Human Rights Dear Members of the Human Rights Committee, 1 have lived most of my life in Edina since the age of 12. 1 am now 73. With your hard work, skill and perseverance in crafting a domestic partnership ordinance, you have enabled a compassionate city council to bring down a 'little Berlin Wall' right here in our community. Having a daughter who is lesbian has been a gift to my husband, Tom and 1. We have advocated at the state level and in our churches and schools for the rights of all gay, lesbian, bi- sexual and transgender people and here it is our city coming through with this momentous decision. Thank you so very much! It was an honor to be present 2 weeks ago and again last night. Peace, Darlene White 5320 Windsor Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Tom and Darlene White tdwhite62 @earthlink.net 1 o uMA b w&ff'C� qaAoo4, -7-67 Sun - Current 33 Second St., NE P.C. Box 280 Osseo, MN 55369 June 3, 2010 Dear Editor, We the undersigned are members of GRANDMOTHERS FOR PEACE, drawing women from many parts of the metropolitan area. Many of us live in Edina and our monthly meetings are held in the Edina Library. or Jim Hovland and the other 4 At the June 1, 2010 City Council Meeting, May council members passed a Domestic Partnership rdinancgranting ega on of the commitment of heterosexual and �o h t gi� n status. We honor the teamwork of the Council and the Human rights and Relations Commission in crafting this ordinance which honors all types of families living in Edina and appreciate the YES vote of every council member in its passage. We are also appreciative of the positive comments and questions from the council. Edina is the first suburb to enact such a fair and just ordinance ands the fourth city in LVilnnesota to do so- 1 h1J vUIG' is reflection of thG' esteem � vYhll,h all couples and �C'� children are held.... A sign of the Peace in which all families are treated with justice and regard. May it spread quickly. S`iLplcerwelAy; ) Darlene White 5320 Windsor Ave. Edina, MN 55436 (952)922 -3401 Members (Signnatures) Joan Schaefer Martha Roberts Marian Wright Eleanor Wagnei Marilyn Jones Judy Sausen Catherine Abbott Marjorie Wunder Judie Carlson Catherine Apostle Kathleen McCarthy Betty Lou Petersen Georgia Anderson �. W �ncQv- �-� U4-0� r RECEIVED JUN 0 7 2010 /10 L--et< c-A-t-C-XIr r _to_� AreeRivers PARK DISTRICT June 11, 2010 Three Rivers Park District Board of RE: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Commissioners Community Assessment Team Analysis Cover Letter Dear Reader, Sara Wyatt Three Rivers Park District (Park District) coordinated a Community Assessment Team District 1 (CAT) to provide guidance in the evaluation of fourteen alternative trail routes under consideration for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the City of Edina. Marilynn Corcoran, The Park District extends gratitude to all CAT members whom provided guidance, District 2 time, questions, and critical insight throughout the evaluation process. The Community Assessment Team Analysis document is a result of the CAT's guidance and includes the social, technical, and economic assessment findings for Mark Haggerty each of the fourteen alternative trail routes evaluated by the CAT as well as District 3 Alternative Trail Route 5F, which was independently studied by the Park District. The route was added to provide consideration of a road -based alternative to Routes 5, 5E, and 5D, the only creek -based routes which did not have a road -based alternative, and due to its viability and utilization of existing trail infrastructure Dale Woodbeck, through Bredesen Park. Vice Chair District a Please review the Community Assessment Team Analysis document for a comprehensive summary of each route under consideration. Rosemary Franzese Sincerely, District 5 Larry Blackstad, Chair Kelly Grissman Appointed Senior Manger of Planning Barbara Kinsey Appointed Cris Gears Superintendent ]: \PROJECTS \Regional. Trails \TNM 0802 Nine Mile Edina Master Plan\A- E\Assessment Team \Final Document \2010 -06 -11 CAT Analysis Cover Letter.doc Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 0 www.ThreeRiversParks.org ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT El the m i s s i o n of Three Rivers Park District is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and education in a natural resources -based park system. Three Rivers Park District was established in 1957 after legislation was enacted in 1955 allowing for the activation of park districts whose primary duties are "acquisition, development and maintenance of large parks, wildlife sanctuaries, forest and other reservations, and means for public access to historic sites and to lakes, rivers and streams and to other natural phenomena" (Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 398.07). Three Rivers Park District serves more than 7 million visitors each year with over 26,500 acres of park reserves, regional parks and special -use areas in Hennepin and six adjoining counties and 100 miles of regional trails. Current outdoor - recreation activities in regional parks include camping, hiking, cross - country and downhill skiing, tubing, bicycling, horseback riding, nature interpretation, golfing, fishing and swimming. Three Rivers Park District also operates a natural resources management program, which administers the restoration and perpetuation of both native wildlife and plants in order to provide a quality recreational experience for park visitors. Board of Commissioners Sara Wyatt Long Lake (District 1) Marilynn Corcoran Dayton (District 2) Mark Haggerty New Hope (District 3) Dale Woodbeck, Vice Chair Shorewood (District 4) Rosemary Franzese St. Anthony (District 5) Larry Blackstad, Chair Hennepin County Appointee Minnetonka Barbara Kinsey Hennepin County Appointee Brooklyn Park Staff Cris Gears, Superintendent and Secretary to the Board Thomas K. McDowell, Associate Superintendent, Division of Recreation and Education Margaret A. Walz, Associate Superintendent, Division of Parks and Natural Resources Boe R. Carlson, Associate Superintendent, Division of Administration Howard D. Koolick, Director of Finance, Chief Financial Officer Donald J. DeVeau, Director, Department of Planning and Development This page left intentionally blank. Acknowledgements Three Rivers Park District gratefully acknowledges the community members and other Community Assessment Team participants who assisted in the social, technical, and economic assessment of the alternative trail routes under consideration. The Park District extends a special thank you to the individuals listed below who provided guidance, time, questions, and critical insight throughout the process. CAT Members / Neighborhood Representatives Richard Johnson, Segment 1 Representative Bob Lubar, Segment 2 Representative Robert Schwartzbauer, Segment 3 Representative Reid Kilberg, Segment 4 Representative Eric Burfeind, Segment 5 Representative Robert Peterson, Segment 5D Representative Dave Henry, Segment 5E & 7 Representative Michael Wolff, Segment 8 Representative Harvey Johnson, Segment 9 Representative Peter McCarthy, Segment 11 Representative Kristine Thompson, Segment 13 Representative Nancy Crain, Segment 19 Representative Wendy Amundson, Segment 20 Representative Edina Park Board Joseph Hulbert, Edina Park Board Bike Edina Task Force Alice Hulbert, Bike Edina City of Edina Staff John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Park District Staff Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning Jonathan Vlaming, Chief of Planning Annie Rexine, Planner Heather Gates, Secretary Alex Sharpe, Planning Aide Randy Lehr, Water Resources Manager Brent Christensen, Graduate Engineer Guest Presenters Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Ciara Schlichting, Planner with Bonestroo, Inc. Danny McCullough, Park District Police Officer Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis V This page left intentionally blank. Executive Summary Project Background The concept for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail was established over ten years ago as part of a larger initiative to lay the foundation for development of multi -use regional trails in the first -ring suburbs. As currently proposed the regional trail provides a critical connection with the existing Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail in the Cities Hopkins and Minnetonka, runs east -west through the City of Edina, extends into the City of Richfield, and provides a connection to the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge in the City of Bloomington and Grand Rounds Trail System at Lake Nokomis in the City of Minneapolis via the planned Intercity Regional Trail. The route for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the Cities of Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield is generally established and pending construction whereas the route through the City of Edina is not yet determined, resulting in a critical gap in the regional trail system and a community underserved by regional trail opportunities. Fourteen alternative trail routes were evaluated from a social, technical, and economical perspective as a part of this study. An environmental assessment was completed simultaneously through an independent initiative. As currently proposed, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is estimated to traverse seven to eight miles and cost between $17 to $20 million to develop. As a fully developed community, implementation of a new regional trail in the City of Edina presents a set of concerns and challenges that are specific to the neighborhoods and greater community in which the trail is proposed and which must be considered throughout the planning and development process. Route Assessment Three Rivers Park District and the City of Edina are committed to identifying the concerns and challenges of implementing Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, and therefore, coordinated a Community Assessment Team (CAT) to help identify the constraints and opportunities associated with each route, provide design suggestions /considerations for each route, and convey project information to other community members. Each of the fourteen routes under consideration was evaluated in respect to social, technical, and economic constraints and opportunities. This document, as outlined on the following page, serves as a summary of the CAT's work. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis VII Overview Each route under consideration is summarized in this document. The route summaries explain the general route layout, identify known potential permanent easement requirements, acknowledge if the route is proposed within parkland or public right -of -way, and identify locations where boardwalks, bridges, tunnels are proposed. Representative photos and a conceptual route map are also included. Economic Assessment The preliminary planning estimate for trail construction is included in each route summary. All trail construction related expenses including paving, grading, clearing and grubbing, bridges, boardwalks, tunnels, restoration, signa,ge, . and associated consulting services are included in the estimates. Costs for easement and wetland mitigation land acquisition are not included in the preliminary planning estimate. Social Assessment Approximately 20 items were studied and quantified as part of the social assessment. The CAT prioritized two items: adjacent residential yards and proximity of trail to homes as the two most important items. The corresponding findings are included in the route summaries. Technical Assessment Approximately 15 items were studied and quantified as part of the technical assessment. The CAT prioritized three items: space requirements (available right -of -way); road crossings, and driveway crossings as the three most important items. The corresponding findings are included in the route summaries. CAT Design Recommendations Design recommendations developed and proposed by CAT members are summarized for, each route. The intent of the design recommendations is to provide future design. guidance and minimize potential trail related impacts on adjacent property owners while maintaining a safe, continuous trail corridor. Design recommendations are generally broad in nature, applicable to the entire trail route, and not specific to a select property. Additional CAT Member Narratives Select CAT member representatives elected to provide an additional narrative to further express their views, opinions, and concerns for the route they represent and /or the role and process of the CAT. The narratives are included in•the route summaries, are unedited, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Park District- Next Steps The Park District is hosting two identical open houses within a 30 -day public comment period between June 14, 2010 and July 14, 2010 to share the environmental, social, technical, and economic assessment findings as well as the CAT design recommendations and the additional CAT member narratives. Upon completion of the public comment period, the information available at the open houses and a summary of public comments will be forwarded to the Edina City Council and Park District Board of Commissioners for consideration in "identifying the preferred regional trail route in late summer /early fall 2010. Nine Mile Creek Regional'Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis IX Table of Contents ProjectB a c k g ro u n d ........................................................... ............................... 1 -8 Route 1 Assessment ........................................................ ............................... 9 -1 2 Route 2 Assessment ........................................................ ..............................1 3 -1 8 Route3 Assessment ...................................................... ............................... 19-22 Route 4 Assessment ...................................................... ............................... 23-26 Route 5 Assessment ........................................................ ..............................2 7 -3 0 Route 5D Assessment ..................................................... ............................... 3 1 -3 4 Route 5E Assessment .................................................... ............................... 35-38 Route 5F Assessment .................................................... ............................... 39-42 Route 7 Assessment ...................................................... ............................... 43-46 Route 8 Assessment ........................................................ ..............................47-52 Route 9 Assessment ...................................................... ............................... 53-56 Route 11 Assessment .................................................... ............................... 57-60 Route 13 Assessment .................................................... ............................... 61 -64 Route 19 Assessment .......................................................... ..........................65 -70 Route 20 Assessment ..................................................... ............................... 71 -76 Conclusion.................................................................................. ..............................7 5 Appendixes Route1 Map ................................... ............................... Route2 Map ................................... ............................... Route3 Map ................................... ............................... Route4 Map ................................... ............................... Route5 Map ................................... ............................... Route5D Map ................................. ............................... Route5E Map ................................. ............................... Route5F Map ................................. ............................... Route7 Map ................................... ............................... Route8 Map ................................... ............................... Route9 Map ................................... ............................... Route11 Map ................................. ............................... Route13 Map ................................. ............................... Route19 Map ................................. ............................... Route20 Map ................................. ............................... Social, Technical & Economic Assessment Methodology..... Social Assessment .......................... ............................... Technical Assessment ................. ............................... Economic Assessment ..................... ............................... .....................7 7 .....................79 .....................81 .....................83 .....................85 .....................87 .....................89 .....................93 .....................95 .....................97 .....................99 ...................103 ...................105 .............107 -110 .............111 -122 ............123 -130 ...................131 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis XI This page lef .intentionally blank. Project Background Overview The concept for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail was established over ten years ago as part of a larger initiative to lay the foundation for development of multi -use regional trails in the first -ring suburbs. As currently proposed, the regional trail provides a critical connection with the existing Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail in the Cities of Hopkins and Minnetonka, runs east-west through the City of Edina (City), extends into the City of Richfield, and provides a connection to the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge in the City of Bloomington and Grand Rounds Trail System at Lake Nokomis in the City of Minneapolis via the planned Intercity Regional Trail. Since the concept of a regional trail through the City emerged ten years ago, several plans and studies have continued to recognize and support the implementation of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. 2000 First Tier Trails, Greenway, & Parks Master Plan The 2000 First Tier Trails, Greenway, and Parks Master Plan (2000 Master Plan) is the result of the regional trail planning work in the first tier communities. This plan included Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, formerly referred to as the Edina /Richfield Corridor (see map on following page), as an important east -west connection through several communities currently underserved by regional trail facilities. The planning work done in association with the 2000 Master Plan involved residents, elected officials and staff from the first -ring communities including the City and Three Rivers Park District (Park District). The 2000 Master Plan proposed several alternative regional trail routes through the City, included opportunities to provide connections to local and regional destinations and identified challenges in respect to topography, limited right -of -way, and potential natural resource impact. The City and Park District acknowledged that additional study of each of the alternative routes was required prior to selecting the preferred route through the City. The 2000 Master Plan serves as the backbone for reevaluating alterative trail routes through the City. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 1 MAKXI Nt(A)FIAt ISSUES LUNSIMIN IS MnanAntD. d!M vbf.p 56M4 "Ww SI tMIS PARK FA&" IN NF FIT VA{ IE. AS A NKIONAL iNUL' AS A LOCAL IAAA.: Vaw, I N OP. M OZ 1N q0. �.}Y .e0 GO..W.w DETAILED Fq F CORRIDOR ANALYSIS NrAY R.. wMYlwi, .stab •.�.: u. «...v.... ONYw.!.abO:f.....w1. AUG{i/l�GCO - rdMiiiwri..i....r •..r+.r ....... �... . ,e .• -. �. _. .. Ow....Yi+n <�.o. foM iy. 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan The Metropolitan Council adopted the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan in June 2005 and later amended the plan in June 2006. The 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan includes Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail as a component of the Regional Parks and Trail System. Development of the Policy Plan included assistance and contributions from residents, numerous organizations, the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, and Regional Park Implementing Agencies such as the Park District. 2006 Needs Assessment Survey The City's Park and Recreation Department conducted a Needs Assessment Survey in 2006. The survey was mailed to more than 3,000 Edina homes - of which, over 900 completed surveys were returned, a high rate of return for this method of survey. The survey found that the majority of residents are pleased with the programs and facilities of the Parks and Recreation Department; however, many respondents expressed an interest in the development of additional bikeways, pathways and trails and a recreation center. Key related findings are summarized below. 1) Walking and biking trails are the most important park and recreation facility to respondent households. 2) 'Exercise /fitness' and 'enjoying the outdoors /nature' are the most important reasons respondent households would use walking and biking trails in the City. 2 Three Rivers Park District 2007 City Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan The City Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan (Bicycle Transportation Plan) was completed in 2007 through a partnership between the City and Bike Edina Task Force and adopted as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan by the City Council in August 2009. The Bicycle Transportation Plan involved participation of residents and elected City officials. The purpose of the Bicycle Transportation Plan is to improve conditions for cycling in the City by reducing hazards, developing and improving the City's bicycle transportation infrastructure, and inviting residents, workers and visitors to include biking as a transportation option for their daily mobility habits. The Bike Transportation Plan includes Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail which generally utilizes the alternative trail routes identified in the 2000 First Tier Trails, Greenway, and 'Parks Master Plan. The routes identified in the Bicycle Transportation Plan that were not included in the previous planning work were added to the list of alternative trail routes for additional evaluation. Current Status of Regional Trail Since the initial recommendation in 2.000 for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, the regional trail continues to remain an important recreation and transportation amenity in local and regional planning initiatives. A preliminary alignment is established in the Cities of Hopkins and Minnetonka, and is anticipated for construction in 2011 pending an easement negotiation. The regional trail through Richfield is planned for construction in 2010 -2012 as part.of a Metropolitan .Council Environmental Services sewer interceptor project along 75th and 76th streets. Completion of.the work in the Cities of Hopkins, Minnetonka; and Richfield will leave a critical gap in the regional trail through the City. The 2006 Needs Assessment Survey, 2007 City Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, and status of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in the adjacent communities served.as the.catalyst for the City's request to the Park District two years ago. to continue planning efforts for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Upon request of the City, the Park District began extensive efforts.to .continue the regional trail planning that began almost ten-years earlier. The alternative trail routes - selected for continued consideration .represent the various alternative routes included in plans and studies outlined above and include road'and creek - based, routes. Slight modifications to the previously identified routes and addition of alternative routes were made to minimize impacts on natural resources and provide road -based alternatives to creek -based routes. Road- based. routes are proposed .within road right- of -w.ay but separate from vehicular traffic. The alternative trail routes are illustrated on the following page. All routes-under consideration are for development of a multi -use regional trail and allow for walking, running, hiking, biking, and in -line skating as well as other non - motorized recreational uses. Road- based regional trail routes fall under the classification of a linking regional trail with the primary purpose to connect people with destinations and creek -based regional trail routes fall under the classification of a destination regional trail, with the primary purpose to provide an opportunity for a high- quality user experience. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 3 ERENPO W 9 f� D 1 O DOVRE DR O /'A RKWOOD LNw� IDYLWOOD L6' IDYLWOOO DR a _ WINDSOR AVE > a n FULLER ST W f'I'O,LOR o SAxONY RD OG,y ¢ TENT AVE &Z qkE �O OAK DR SSTM ST - -- -- O 0~ IASPEN RD gRE '! uAN GFORD OR z J Q 3 S .. IF(( OE CIRU Ol,1,. JERNON - 621p S W CIRCLE DR uR` / 94CTICWP+ GLEASON CZ , MCCAULEy �O ti'LLS RD r� fi APACHE RD (iDl 4 -1- - H 4'yILTON RO, WEs TTRL i PAID O 69TH ST W P FO,R i x 212 70TH ST WO u• J Legend Alternative Trail Routes` 5E Alternative Trail Route Number TIMBER RV rc EB`EE LN OEE RD 56TH ST W .VIE Y z TH ST W o 55 g HAWKES TER o N 6 + YVONNE TER 56TH ST W- x O m w 56TH ST W pP = TOWER ST O EPOO in ¢ ( \\ SOUTHVIEW LK� O M w¢ I I WOODLAND RD 57TH ST W Q GROV ' �NI a a- OGROVE ST o m GROVE ST - m E ST w PHILBROOK Z u }� 58TH STW > S _ S8TH ST W O` or BENTON AVE yUN RO I N W 2 59TH ST m Q w j I \f w 3 Q 59T14 ST W Edina o S O 0 L R TH ST u H LLn00 D ¢ a¢ i m m w '� > 4 �F ii FO u O 5 60TH ST W f- a 63 ST STW R 3 '60' W w x m z �� rc w � S( /NOR h Pp a w w � � JEFF PL Y BIRCHCPR' 5F 62nD STW ¢ p APO P (` "AD DOK LN Jp rc `W - -" >' uI - _ '62ND STYI ROBERT$ PL W rNIAL WAY RD 3RD ST - GP0.R150N CN m a 5D f VALLEY JVE� 62 6 63RD ST 0 a HER,, PNE DR wH VE u < > NAB 4H0 TRL Y BALDER LN ¢ w w 9 w ¢ a >> a 647n ST a r Q y w ¢ ¢ 64TH ST W m0 �VA i m T! 65TH ST W m � n � n O y RD F N ^, O 3 O ('yF�F2 w rO 5E CREE�JPLLE 66TH ST�Mf P W yA� - - -�_ 66TH ST u z ¢ Yf yF LO LN Ll LN = Oq _ F D P SUSAN 3 'y 11 ¢ LAGUNA DR 0 U Miles 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 * Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflect conceptual trail corridor and does not depict actual trail alignment. VALLEY VIEW RD - f -- 6gT DRi r w 9 e z cG4N k BALFANZ RD m U PER m yr. CHAPEL BRO Om f2 O p(ROC' Z 100 TER" Wf(FORO ¢ W� 3 ERIN,; MCGUIRE RD a r /�, ONO, WO .. Zy 02 69TH ST N' 69TH ST W'� v Qa' S RFRCPOM DUNBERRY (N Py O `70TH ST -Y�' g� x 2 S NO tiytiy o � =o ao i 0 ? 8 oY n o W = c Z _ = 73RD ST W z � p F Y u, DEWEY HILL RD 74TH ST W w T1 t N \ /F B ao t 76TH IT W Y" � n 18TH ST W ' 28 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: City of Edina Alternative Trail Routes m O F ANDOVER RD MAVELLE DR mz EQ13" BELVIDERE LN nAZELTON RV C 4gfA LN C(ARf `o N 2 4.,U (N DUNNRMO RE DR o a m F(LSk'ORTH DR w ~ 100 FONDELL DR a u s�o DR U u g 7D� ayE 19 QARKLAWN VE PpPPLA u !2 76TH ST W - x O > , -TH sT W 17 w 31 a VIKING DR" MINNESOTA DR 0 j� � This GIs Data is provided "as is" without warranty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. f� The user acknowledges and accepts the limitations of the Data, including the fact that the Data is dynamic and is in a constant state of maintenance, correction, and update. ThreeRivers Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District PARK UISTR[CT Planning Section - (KG 04 -05 -2010 4.1 U V) d V) Q7 Q) Q) t_ L Specific definitions of the aforementioned trail terminology are as follows: Linking regional trails primary purpose is to efficiently connect people with destinations. Linking trails may be located in road right -of -way or other narrow corridors that efficiently connect destinations. Destination regional trails are destinations in themselves and are routed to provide high - quality recreation experiences that traverse significant natural and cultural resources areas. Destination trails may also serve a linking function and linking trails may also serve a destination function. A summary of the planning work for the last two years is outlined below. Fall 2008 - Winter 2008: Staff Review City and Park District staff reviewed previous planning and study work for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and compiled all proposed routes for additional review and consideration. Spring 2009: Open Houses The Park District and City hosted two open houses: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 and Monday, March 9, 2009. The open houses were attended by approximately 125 people and over 250 people respectively. The public was presented with information on the Park District Regional Trail System, types of regional trails, project background, previous planning work, expected use, typical maintenance and operation procedures, public safety background, regional trail design standards, large scale maps and aerials of the alternative trail routes, and opportunities to provide public comment. Summer 2009 - Summer 2010: Environmental Assessment The Park District elected to conduct a voluntary Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for all the routes under consideration -in Edina as of June 2010 with the exception of Alternative Trail Routes 5F and 20. Route.SF was added into consideration in spring 2010 to.. provide an alternative to creek - based routes 5, 5D, and 5E after the preliminary,en:vironmental and economic findings were completed. Route 20 was not included in the EAW because \a significant portion already exists and the remaining unbuilt portion is. proposed within road right -of -way and environmental impact is not foreseen. Completion.-of the EAW was determined an important step due to the location of several alternative trail routes within or adjacent to existing natural resources. The EAW's purpose is to identify and quantify the potential environmental impacts for each of the alternative trail routes under consideration. The EAW findings will help determine if any alternative trail routes should be removed from.further consideration due to potential environmental impacts. and determine the preferred Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, route through Edina. The EAW evaluates a variety of components including but not limited to-land use, land cover types, fish, .wildlife, and ecologically sensitive resources, water resources, .water - related land use management, erosion and sedimentation, water quality, geologic hazards and soil conditions, traffic, air emissions, odors, noise, and'dust, nearby resources, visual impacts, land use regulation, infrastructure and public services,. cumulative potential effects and other potential environmental impacts. Nine Mile Greek'Regional Trail'. - 'Community Assessment Team Analysis 5 In the summer of 2009, the Park District hired Bonestroo, Inc. an independent third party to conduct the environmental assessment and all associated field work, data computation, permit requirements, and regulatory stakeholder coordination. Finalization of the EAW is anticipated after a public comment period in the Summer 2010 and after the EAW is amended, as appropriate, to reflect pertinent information brought forward during the public comment period. The EAW will be forwarded for use in the selection of preferred route to the Edina Park Board, Edina City Council, Park District Board of Commissioners as well as other regulatory parties as appropriate. The results of the environmental assessment are available under separate cover. Fall 2009 - Summer 2010: Social, Technical and Economic Assessments The Park District coordinated a Community Assessment Team (CAT) comprised of neighborhood representatives as well as representatives from Bike Edina, Edina Park Board, the City, and Park District. CAT neighborhood representative were nominated by property owners living adjacent the alternative trail routes in early Fall 2009 with the exception of Route 5F which was added into consideration in spring 2010 at the completion of the CAT process. The CAT provided guidance in the completion of the social, technical, and economic assessments. Role and Purpose of CAT The CAT was established to provide guidance in the evaluation of each of the routes under consideration and was not intended to serve in a decision making capacity. The role of the CAT was to identify the constraints and opportunities associated with each route, provide design suggestions /considerations for each route, and convey information back to their respective route neighbors. The CAT team was limited to evaluating the alternative trail routes that were previously proposed in past planning documents. Park District representatives allowed for one exception to these guidelines and introduced Route 5F, a road - based route, as an alternative to Routes 5, 5D, and 5E, the only creek - based routes which did not have an alternative road -based route. The CAT was presented with the preliminary findings of the environmental assessment and provided with an opportunity to ask questions regarding the environmental assessment findings. However, the role of the CAT was not to provide oversight or interpretation of the environmental assessment which was coordinated as an independent assessment. 6 Three Rivers Park District Date Sum 1) Defined role of the community asse!sment team Meeting 1 December 2, 2009 2) Reviewed project history 3) Identified criterion for assessing alternative trail routes Field Visits December 2009 - Walked eact alternative trail route and lanuary 2010 discussed areas of opportunity and challenges 1) Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Update Meeting 2 Jarwary 13, 2010 2) EAW Update 3) Three Rivers Park District Regional Trail Public Safety Overview 1) Frnalited criterion for assessing Meeting 3 February 17, 2010 l aterrative trail routes 2) Defined significance of each criterion 3) Determine how to quantify each criterion Reviewed Ervironmental Assessment: MWdng 4 April 5, 2010 methodology, preliminary findings, and public review process 1) Sumnanzed locations and rational for studied routes 2) Reviewed technical, social, and economic Meeting S May 17, 2010 3) assessment Priortized technical and social assessment criteria 4) Deveoped design recommendations for each route The CAT met regularly for six months which resulted in the completion of the social; technical, and economic assessments, design recommendations, and additional CAT member narratives. This work is outlined below. Social Assessment The social assessment focused on population of the trail service area, number and type of adjacent properties, proximity of trail to adjacent homes, potential impacts to residential viewsheds and privacy, accessibility, potential parking impacts, opportunities to coordinate with other projects, potential tree impacts, desired trail user experience, and number of destinations within walking and biking distance to the trail route. Technical Assessment The technical assessment was instrumental in the development of the economic assessment and included identification of necessary trail related structures such as boardwalks, tunnels, and bridges, available right -of -way and potential road reconstruction requirements, permitting obstacles, utilities conflicts, safety concerns such as driveway and road crossings and the type, speed, and functional classification of the adjacent road. The CAT also requested that carbon requirements for trail construction and potential loss of carbon storage be evaluated. A method to quantify this request was not established, and therefore, could not be quantified; however, the CAT did recognize this as an important consideration. Economic Assessment The economic assessment resulted in a preliminary planning estimate for trail construction and includes costs associated with regional trail construction including costs associated with bridges, boardwalks, street reconstruction, development of safe road crossings; retaining walls, signage, grading, paving, wetland and floodplain mitigation, and all associated consultant services. Costs associated with permanent or temporary easements or land acquisition costs for wetland mitigation were not quantified in the economic assessment and therefore not included in the preliminary planning estimate for trail construction. CAT Design Recommendations CAT members provided design recommendations for each route under consideration based on the social, technical, and economic findings as well as their knowledge of the route and neighbors they represented. T.he intent of the design recommendations is to provide future design guidance and minimize potential trail route*impacas on the adjacent.property owners while maintaining a safe, continuous trail corridor. Design recommendations are generally broad in nature; applicable to entire trail route, and not specific to a select property. In addition to the design recommendations specific to each route, the CAT developed several design recommendations for consideration throughout the entire regional trail corridor. • Consider screenings in design phase where trail is "above grade. Consider variance on fence height when used to screen the trail /adjacent properties. • Naturally screened areas should be replaced with equal natural screen. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail -- Community Assessment Team Analysis 7 Additional CAT Member Narrative In addition to the assessments and design recommendations that were compiled under the guidance of the CAT members, several CAT members requested an opportunity to provide an additional narrative to further express their views, opinions, and concerns for the route they represent and /or the role and process of the CAT. The narratives are included in the individual route summaries, are unedited, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Park District. The social and technical assessments were extensive, and therefore, were prioritized by the CAT through a ranking exercise. The social and technical criteria that received the most votes by CAT members as well as the preliminary planning estimate for trail construction, design recommendations and additional CAT members narratives are included in a summary of each trail route in the following chapters. The complete social and technical assessments and economic assessment summary are included in this document as appendixes. Next Steps The Park District is hosting a 30 -day public comment period between June 14, 2010 and July 14, 2010 to share the environmental, social, technical, and economic assessment findings as well as the CAT design recommendations and the additional CAT member narratives. The 30 -day public comment period will include two identical open houses. Open House 1 Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:00 to 8:30 PM Presentation at 6:30 PM South View Middle School Gym /Auditorium 4725 South View Lane Edina, MN 55424 Open House 2 Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:00 to 7:30 PM Presentation at 5:30 PM South View Middle School Gym /Auditorium 4725 South View Lane Edina, MN 55424 Upon completion of the 30 -day public comment period, the assessment findings, CAT design recommendations, additional 'CAT member narratives, and a summary of public comments will be forwarded to the Edina City Council and Park. District Board of Commissioners for consideration in identifying the preferred regional trail route in late summer /early -fall 2010. 8 Three. Rivers, Park District Route 1 Assessment 169 Underpass > Parkland > Lincoln Drive > Londonderry Drive Overview Route 1 begins at the existing underpass of Highway 169, on the south side of Nine Mile Creek. The route proposes utilizing a boardwalk through the wetland. Upon reaching upland, the route follows the northern edge of Lincoln Drive cul -de -sac and the east side of the road. The route proposes traversing along parkland to Dovre Drive, where road reconstruction is proposed to remove one lane of parkand and reducing the need for a retaining wall and minimizing potential impacts to creek corridor vegetation. Route 1 ends at Londonderry Drive. The above photos show Lincoln Drive facing south. Route 1 is proposed on the east side of the street. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $1,300,000 V • fIFMM[TOAtKA N ar � Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 1 Legend r-7_J u _I— Cay Bou day X11 SaMU.d RW. d 155 310 on P-1, - H.Nnpn _ Owne0a Tlad Rown Ch of Edna Nopeny Edna SIVO Dalna P,0peny MlNwlgi '� ��.�•r: r Lakle Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 9 Route 1 Assessment, cont`d 169 Underpass > Parkland > Lincoln Drive > Londonderry Drive Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 1 Number of residential back yards 34 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one parking lane at Dovre Drive along Lincoln Drive. Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 2 Speed limit of roads 2 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 1 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 7,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 local road 1 collector road 10 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 260' Average distance from house to property line 30' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 0 ®ute 1 Assessment,, cont"d. 169 Underpass > Parkland > Lincoln Drive > Londonderry Drive CAT Design Recommendations Route 1 is recommended on the east side of the road. In addition, it is recommended that the trail alignment be considered within the road foot print, where necessary, to minimize tree removal and potential impacts. The west side of Lincoln Drive was eliminated from further study due to the presence of several business driveways and less desirable road intersection crossing at Londonderry Drive. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. "The serenity of the wetlands in this part of the proposed trail will end and be replaced by the clatter of bikes on the wooden boardwalks to be installed to accommodate travel. Too, the fall of many majestic trees along Lincoln Drive will but denude a part of the pristine watershed. The second sentence above was used because trees may be removed, which leads me to inquire: if 10.5' of Lincoln Drive is to be used for the trail, isn't that enough? Also, why is there a need for any road re- construction? Presumably, the existing road surface will -be used.. In that connection, I note that a part of Lincoln Drive will -be used for route 3." - Richard Johnson, Segment 1 Representative 12 Three. Rivers Park District Route 2 Assessment Londonderry Drive > Parkland > Londonderry Drive & Road > Walnut Ridge Park > Parkland > Vernon Avenue South Overview Route 2 begins at the intersection of Lincoln and Londonderry Drives and heads east on the south side of Londonderry Drive. An easement from United Health Care is anticipated. The rest of the route is located within parkland or road right -of -way. The route proposes a boardwalk through the wetland along the south side of the creek. Approximately two- thirds of the way across the wetland, the route crosses the creek and utilizes the upland along the south side of Londonderry Drive and east side of Londonderry Road. At Walnut Ridge Park the route heads east and utilizes the existing trail on the north and east side of the park. Upon reaching the southeast corner of the Walnut Ridge Park play fields the route is proposed to head east to Vernon Avenue over a wetland while utilizing a boardwalk. Route 2 ends at Vernon Avenue. A boardwalk is proposed to cross the wetland in the photo to the left. The photo on the right shows the proposed trail location along the road edge of Londonderry Drive near Walnut Ridge Park, Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $2,400,000 `N\ A Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 2 Legend rLf—Lr_.. _.__, `Y Cey Banda. o 2M MO an P.-Is Hennep -r, Aft n h e Trai Rados Cey of Edna Property Str- Edna School DW,,cl Property NtOands Lakes ,...... ... -«.. ... Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 13 Route 2 Assessment, cont'd Londonderry Drive > Parkland > Londonderry Drive & Road > Walnut Ridge Park > Parkland > Vernon Avenue South Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 4 Number of residential back yards 61 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings I Speed limit of roads 1 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 1 at 5,000 - 6,999 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 collector road 14 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 310' Average distance from house to property line 50' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi- family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial. crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 0 Route s y. .. .. m u tf M Londonderry Drive >. Parkland- > Londonderry Drive .& Road > Wa.lnut Ridge Park > Parkland > Vernon Avenue South CAT Design Recommendations Route 2 recommendations include locating the trail in a manner that maximizes distance from homes, avoids vistas of adjacent homes, and avoids locations which overlook adjacent homes. In addition, it is recommended to continue to review safety, use, and parking within Walnut Ridge Park during the design phase. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. 'As CAT representative for Segment 2, I have been asked to provide my comments on the Nine Mile Creek CAT Analysis. Neighborhood Representatives were asked to evaluate and analyze data related to the study. It is difficult to provide comments on the' complete document since Three Rivers Park District (3RPD):. . with the two most significant portions of the study (the Executive Summary and Conclusions) from all Neighborhood Representatives. Our inclusion in the above portions of the document could have improved the quality of the output. . Today, much of the 9 Mile Creek Corridor is effectively a narrow ribbon of a nature preserve. Given that we have so few undeveloped natural acres within Edina, it is critical that any development plans are made with care and with a view to the future. We also want to have some oversight regarding the projects upon which we choose to incur government spending. These tax dollars should be spent efficiently and consistently with the priorities facing our community. The CAT Analysis is flawed for the following reasons: 1. Conclusions from 2006 Needs. Assessment are misinterpreted 2: Agreed upon processes were not followed 3. Cost (and other data) promised for delivery was not delivered 4. Analysis fails to address concerns of residents in Segment 2 2006 Needs Assessment • As background, this assessment was used as the justification for planning "the regional trail. • The 2006 analysis states that biking and walking trails are the most important needs for the community While - technically true; the__2nd most Important need identified was preserving ---- -- -- - - -- - �_ -- - -- -_ - _ - - - - -- --- �- _- -_�.___. �..� �.._.. outdoors and nature.. The. difference.in the reported level of. needs is statistically. insignificant between these two options. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 15 Route 2 Assessment,,. cont"d Londonderry Drive > Parkland > Londonderry Drive & Road.> Walnut Ridge Park > Parkland > Vernon Avenue South Additional CAT Member Narrative, cont'd • This ranking is complicated by the fact that biking and walking trails were combined into one need. I would argue that the needs of bikers'and walkers are not the same (recreational vs. commuter). So, if bikers' needs and walkers' needs were tabulated separately in the 2006 analysis, then outdoors and nature would be the dominant need. o This change would impact how a regional trail would be considered. • The 2006 (survey) assessment fails to ask people how much they would be willing to spend on the proposed amenities. Inclusion of cost criteria is a serious short coming of the assessment and may have changed the outcome. • The bikers I surveyed are not pleased with any of the options offered. They believe that a street based solution would be faster and more efficient. • In any event, bikers and walkers on the same trail pose safety risks. 3RPD failed to follow processes that it established • . 3RPD added a new proposed. segment (5F) after establishing rules that no new routes were to be considered. Review of alternative routes could add to the quality of the analysis and perhaps make the project more cost effective.. • 3RPD is attempting to hold public hearings on both the CAT Analysis and the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) concurrently. The EAW is several months late. The original schedule called for review of the EAW prior to a review of the CAT Analysis. o To prepare the CAT Analysis (this document), 3RPD had CAT members force rank pro and cons of proposed trail attributes prior to release of EAW. Therefore, the CAT was not able to incorporate insights from the (final) EAW into our thoughts on this analysis. o Wording within Social and Technical Analysis was vague (and pro- development) which reduced the value of the force rankings completed by each team member. - o 3RPD committed to offering the alternative of the status quo on each for each trail segment. This was not included in the documents presented to the CAT. o It is; therefore, premature to be issuing the CAT Analysis Cost and other promised data not delivered • This analysis fails to answer the question, "What are we getting in return for our tax dollars and how do we know citizens support-this level of spending on this project "? The document does not identify total costs °for the project. 16 Three Rivers Park District Route 2 - Assessment,, cont-A Londonderry Drive > Parkland. >. Londonderry Drive & Road > Walnut Ridge Park > Parkland > Vernon Avenue South Additional CAT Member Narrative, cont'd • Direct costs were estimated at approximately $20 million (prior to financing expenses and without specific placement of each route). With assumed financing costs and very modest cost overruns, the total direct costs of this project become about $35 million for a 7 mile trail. This makes the cost about $950 per linear foot. It is also the equivalent of paying 140 teachers ($50,000 each) for 5 years. • 1 am not an expert in this area, but wetland mitigation expenses seem understated for a project of this nature. Review of the EAW would likely test this portion of the cost analysis. • 3RPD promised to provide estimates for indirect costs and incremental project costs. This data was not provided and could be a significant factor in the decision making process. o Understanding indirect and /or - incremental costs (project contingency expenses, first responder, neighborhood patrols, additional staff requirements, accommodations to impacted residents, local design changes, reserves for future. liability, etc.) to Edina and Hennepin County are critical to evaluating the merits of going forward with this project: o The concern-is that citizens need to know what costs they will likely incur going forward, regardless of which agency is spending the. dollars. • Above costs exclude the proposed concurrent project by 9 Mile Creek Watershed Authority to re- route the creek and improve the quality of the creek bed. The financial impact of the combined projects will be significant and perhaps not necessary. o These projects (Bike Trail and Creek Re- routing) individually and collectively may increase risk and therefore need for financial reserves to both the city and the park district. • The process failed to allow investigation of more cost effective ways to achieve the goal (east /. west bike trail). • 3RPD promised to-evaluate the net carbon footprint left by development of the trail. This was omitted from the final product.. Concerns of segment 2 residents • The trail proposal involves permanently transferring over 13 net acres of city property (much of it considered wet lands) to 3RPD. It will forever change this natural corridor in a largely urban area. Have we thought through alternative uses of these high valued wetlands? • Walnut Ridge Park is intended to be a "trail head" location where users will start /end their journey. The increased park .usage will create safety, privacy, traffic and noise issues for residents. o Children's play area adjacent to a high speed bike lane. Young kids and a high speed bikes trail do.not.mix well.,, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail.-Community Assessment Team Analysis 17 a •� }; a e Ass, per, x` s k e n t z.+•' 43 Londonderry Drive > Parkland >.. Londonderry Drive & Road > Walnut Ridge Park > Parkland > Vernon Avenue South Additional CAT Member Narrative, cont'd o Walkers on the paved ring will compete with bikers in the same space o Traffic and parking in neighborhoods may become an issue. • Residents are concerned about the disruption and inconvenience that comes with a 3 to 4 year construction process (per 3RPD). • This process will involve heavy machinery and be very noisy during construction and will require property owners to allow workers access to private property. Quiet enjoyment of residents' property will be gone forever. • In the wetland areas, the trail will be elevated and consist of treated wood timbers. ❑ Traffic on these timbers will generate a lot of noise and be disruptive to the community. How will this be addressed? ❑ , The elevated wood timbers in a flood plain are likely to catch debris and therefore increase the risk of flood damage to the structure and to. adjacent area. How will this be addressed? • Tree loss • A substantial number of trees will be destroyed to provide access for machinery and equipment to wetland areas. • Smaller number of trees to be. lost within Walnut Ridge Park as proposed trail will widen the existing trail. • These trees absorb CO2 and are very effective sound barriers. . • Plant and Wildlife o This area is rich in wildlife. o A trail bisecting the wetlands may adversely affect threatened or endangered plants as well as habitat of threatened or endangered wildlife. It may risk dislodging animal life from their natural areas. Recommendation Based on what I know about both the cost and the environmental impact of this plan; it needs significant work before it is ready to be objectively evaluated. Alternative routes need to be considered." - Bob Lubar, Segment 2 Representative Route 3 Assessment Londonderry Drive > Lincoln Drive > Vernon Avenue > Gleason Road Overview Route 3 begins at the intersection of Lincoln and Londonderry Drives and heads south on the east side of Lincoln Drive and then east on the north side of Vernon Avenue within existing road right -of -way. Road reconstruction is proposed around Langford Drive and between Habitat Court and Walnut Drive to reduce shoulder width and /or remove one parking lane and minimize potential impacts to adjacent properties. Route 3 ends at Gleason Road. The above photograph illustrates Lincoln Road near United Health. The trail is proposed on the east side of the road. This photograph (courtesy of Bob Schwartzbauer) is taken along Lincoln Avenue near the Highway 169 and 62 interchange. The trail is proposed on the east side of the road in this location. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $1,600,000 a� N A Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 3 Legend Fh. CM B0111d..& Sebcbd Raga 0 TS 350 1.100 P—el. - H—w pn ANam — T1ad Routes Coy of E" P,.Wy St— _ Eclna Sctwd Doo, c Property Wa I-ft -++— Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 19 Route 3 Assessment, cont'd Londonderry Drive > Lincoln Drive > Vernon Avenue > Gleason Road Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 9 Number of residential side yards 9 Number of residential back yards 4 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Reduce shoulder width near Langford Court and remove one lane of park- ing between Habitat Court and Walnut Drive, Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 8 Speed limit of roads 8 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 7 a <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 7,000 - 9,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 7 local roads 1 collector road 20 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 45' Average distance from house to property line 40' Number of houses < 25 feet 4 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 7 Multi- family driveway crossings 2 Low turnover commercial crossings 1 High turnover commercial crossings 1 Total driveway crossings 11 Route 3 Assessment,, c t'd Londonderry Drive > Lincoln Drive > Vernon Avenue > Gleason Road CAT Design Recommendations Route 3 recommendations include replacing trees /natural buffers that may be impacted, addressing the lack of pedestrian crossings at Gleason Road, and using right -of -way as much as possible. The west side of Lincoln Drive, south side of Vernon Avenue, and variations. including either option were eliminated from further study due to the presence of limited right -of -way, steep roadside embankment, drainage ditch, and safety of crossing a collector street mid - block. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. "Segment 3 is an all -on -road route. It will run along Lincoln Drive, which becomes Vernon Ave. about one -half (112) way through the route. It will run along side Lincoln Drive and Vernon Ave. Lincoln Drive /Vernon Ave. is a collector roadway, meaning it is�more heavily trafficked than most streets in Edina.. Although the speed limit is 30 m.p.h., virtually everyone exceeds that speed. At least 3 bus routes use this road, including Edina Public Schools buses.. The trail will replace the existing sidewalk that runs nearly the entire lengt4 of the segment. The trail.will abut the streets that are the only access and egress from United Healthcare's.headquarters where. approximately 1100 cars enter and leave five days per week. Every one of those cars will have to cross the trail twice per day. At least 600 people live in condos and houses along this route. - Many, 'if not most, are senior citizens. Any of those residents who leave their homes will have -to cross the trail. In: this segment, the trail will intersect with 8 streets and at least 11 driveways. To deal with this safety problem, the Park District plans to erect 8 stop signs for bicyclists. That means that if the cyclist stops, (s)he must stop :every 0.,15 miles on average. Safety is a major concern of everyone living in this segment that I've spoken to. Of course, the trail in segment 3 will abut over 30 homes that are about only 60 feet from the trail, on average. Four homes will be within 25 feet of the trail. For those homeowners who look out.their windows, up to an estimated 500,000 bicyclist and walkers .will appear to be passing through their living rooms. The trail will abut at least 9 front yards, 14 side yards and 9 back yards. Many of the homeowners along this route have added landscaping consisting of trees, shrubs etc, that provide a screen from the passing traffic and the traffic -on Hwy -62. -Approximately- 130 trees, at least six (6) inches in diameter, including 25 year -old pines and other landscaping will be destroyed. Those cannot not be replaced." - Robert Schwartzbauer, Segment 3 Representative Nine Mile. Creek Regional Trail _ Community Assessment Team Analysis .21 This page left intentionally blank. t Route 4 Assessment Vernon Avenue > Gleason Road > Bredesen Park Overview Route 4 is proposed to head south along east side of Gleason Road from Vernon Avenue to the Bredeson Park trail access at approximately Gleason Court. The route is proposed entirely within existing public road right -of -way or parkland. Road reconstruction just north of the creek to reduce shoulder width is proposed. The route utilizes the existing Bredesen Park trail system which separates pedestrian and bicyclists. This will reduce potential conflicts between regional trail users and existing Bredesen Park trail users and reduce the need to increase the width of the existing trail system. Route 4 ends at the approximately location of the Highway 62 /Gleason Road on /off ramps. This photograph shows Gleason Road along Bredesen Park. The trail is proposed on the east side of Gleason Road adjacent to Bredesen Park. The trail is proposed to replace the sidewalk along the east side of Gleason Road. In coordination with future road reconstruction, it is recommended to narrow the road north of Nine Mile Creek to reduce the shoulder width in order to accommodate the regional trail and minimize impacts on adjacent properties. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $800,000 7, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 4 Legend 0 175 7® 700 Crty Ooundary �� Seleaed Route �' F'aRlia- Ilmne0ln Attemat" Tray Poms C,ry nlftlna Pr�•rr� lr- Ed— `.kl —1 UMnll F+�uV�'�Ir K1:Ilandv lake: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 23 Route 4 Assessment, cont'd Vernon Avenue > Gleason Road > Bredesen Park Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 0 Number of residential back yards 8 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Reduce shoulder width north of creek crossing along Gleason Road. Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 0 Speed limit of roads 0 Average annual daily traffic 0 Functional Class 0 24 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 70' Average distance from house to property line 65' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 Nigh turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 0 Route 4 Assessment, cont"d Vernon Avenue > Gleason Road > Bredesen Park CAT Design Recommendations Route 4 recommendations include addressing the lack of pedestrian crossings across Gleason Road, reducing the trail impact of Gleason /Vernon traffic flow, utilizing a southern access point to Bredesen Park off of Gleason Road, minimizing impact /viewshed of Route 5 bridge over Highway 62 on Bredesen Park, considering a fence height variance along the trail route for screening, and incorporating screening where the trail will be elevated over the adjacent properties. The west side of Gleason Road was eliminated from further study due to the physical constraints at the existing Nine Mile Creek tunnel under Gleason Road, including horizontal and vertical clearance, and safety of a mid -block crossing of an "A" minor arterial street. Additional CAT Member Narrative No additional CAT Member comments were received. This page left intentionally blank. Route 5 Assessment Bredesen Park > Highway 62 Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge > Parkland > School Property Overview Route 5 begins in Bredesen Park and includes a new pedestrian/ bicycle bridge over Highway 62. The bridge will connect Bredesen Park to Creek Valley Elementary School and Edina Middle and High Schools. The route is proposed along the northern edge of the prairie at Creek Valley Elementary School. An easement from Edina School District is anticipated for Route 5. At the end of the prairie the trail heads south through the mowed area and then east on the south side of the play fields and north side of the parking area. The route continues east along the northern boundary of the mowed area through the high school play fields. The intent of the route through the Edina School District property and park area is proposed to reduce the amount of trail though wetland and floodplain. Route 5 ends at the northeast corner of the high school playfields. w Route 5 is proposed behind Creek Valley Elementary School, shown above, and the Edina Middle and High Schools. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $2,700,000 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 5 Legend rZI— L� -1r.r (o Cry Boundary P%, Sek<ted Route o e Hd No P—th - H—P. Aft—t- Trait Routes CrydEd PIopertv su-. _ Edina Sc hoot D".t P,. e,rr V --and, mow~ «w lakes ............... ^' Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 27 Route 5 Assessment, cont'd Bredesen Park > Highway 62 Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge > Parkland > School Property Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 0 Number of residential back yards 3 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. I Number of road crossings 0 Speed limit of roads 0 Average annual daily traffic 0 Functional Class 0 28 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 110' Average distance from house to property line 60' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 0 Route 5 Assessment, con y Bredesen Park > Highway 62 Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge_ > Parkland > School Property CAT Design Recommendations Route 5 recommendations include minimizing the impact of the proposed ramp for the Highway 62 pedestrian/ bicycle bridge on Bredesen Park. Additional CAT Member Narrative No additional CAT Member comments were received. This page left intentionally blank. i Route 5D Assessment School Property > Parkland > Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road Overview Route 5D starts at the northeast corner of the high school playfields, heads northeast to the south side of Highway 62 and then heads east to Tracy Avenue. A boardwalk is proposed to cross the creek and associated wetland areas. At Tracy Avenue the route heads south and parallels the west side of Tracy Avenue. An easement from Creek Valley Baptist Church may be required to minimize wetland impacts and minimize steepness of the trail. Route 5D ends at Valley View Road. Route 5D is proposed within Tracy Avenue right -of- way, adjacent to the Creek Valley Church. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $1,000,000 N A Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 5D Legend (� UY 8— rdanes ^,� Selects Rarte Percels - Hennepin ARernetrce T-I Raga Cey of Edna Property S kY Eden Sd=l Dig-I Property MIMOMws Wm W -1r r o so reo sW Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 31 Route 5D Assessment, cont'd School Property > Parkland > Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 0 Number of residential back yards 0 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 1 Speed limit of roads 1 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 1 at 7,000 - 9,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 collector road 32 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 0 Average distance from house to property line 0 Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 1 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 1 CAT Design Recommendations_ No design recommendations were submitted by CAT members. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the.author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. "Segment 5D would be resisted by Creek Valley Church based on the recently revised route. Initially; the route chosen for 5D passed along the north of church property, crossed Tracy Ave at the intersection with Hwy 62, and travelled along the east face of Tracy southward to the intersection with Valley View Rd. The revised route shows 5D passing along the west side of Tracy Ave. First, Creek Valley Church would definitely strongly resist granting an easement for this path, since it unnecessarily uses church property and appreciably degrades the view of the church property from those traveling on. Tracy Avenue. Secondi the crossing of Tracy would now be at the Valley View intersection, which is a rather dangerous crossing point because of the_speed of cars and buses coming down the hill from the south. Only two private homes are affected by an east -side route along Tracy.. However, the path would be elevated along this stretch, having people looking down into those two. homes from the pathway. That's not a good feature. Frankly, the only really positive asset of 5D is the possiblility of .crossing Tracy at the least hazardous point -- the Tracy 162 intersection. That's no longer shown in the revision of 5D." - Robert Peterson, Segment 5D Representative Route 5E Assessment School Property > Parkland > Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road Overview Route 5E starts at the northeast corner of the high school playfields and heads east to Tracy Avenue. A boardwalk is proposed to cross the creek and associated wetland areas. An easement from Creek Valley Baptist Church may be required due to limited parkland on the north side of the creek. Route 5E ends at Valley View Road. The above photograph shows the southern boundary of Creek Valley Church. Route 5E is proposed between Nine Mile Creek and the church driveway. An easement from the church may be required. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $1,100,000 N A Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 5E Legend�rM, C,O cd1 eoundely ^� Sebded Route 0 05 190 500 Parcels He pn Arw l — T-1 Routes Car of Edna Property stream _ Edna S&.Oi Dsvo Propeny Wetlands a.° axiom• Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 35 Route 5E Assessment, cont'd School Property > Parkland > Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 0 Number of residential back yards 13 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 1 Speed limit of roads 1 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 1 at 7,000 vehicles /day - 9,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 collector road 36 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 450' Average distance from house to property line 120' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi- family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 0 CAT Design Recommendations Route 5E.recommends Locating the trail along'Nine Mile Creek on the south side of the Creek Baptist Church property to minimize potential impacts on the church. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the.official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District- "Segment SE would be favored by Creek Valley Church, and an easement could probably be negotiated without difficulty. Segment 5D would have the same problem of crossing Tracy at the intersection with Valley View Rd, however. Additionally, several more private homes would be affected by a backyard view of the trail (though frankly from quite a distance across a reflecting pond)." - Robert Peterson, Segment 5D Representative This page left intentionally blank. Route 5F Assessment Bredesen Park > Olinger Boulevard > Tracy Avenue > Countryside Park > Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road Overview Route 5F begins at the terminus of Route 4 in Bredesen Park. The route is proposed to head east through Bredesen Park along the existing pedestrian and bicycle trail system to Olinger Boulevard where it is proposed on the south side of the street. At Tracy Avenue, the trail route heads south along the west side of the road and along Countryside Park and the fire station. At the intersection of the Highway 62 on /off ramps and Tracy Avenue, the trail route is proposed to cross Tracy Avenue and continue south along the east side of Tracy Avenue to Valley View Road. A parallel pedestrian /bicycle bridge along Tracy Avenue over Highway 62 is proposed for this route. The above photographs illustrate the existing road conditions of Tracy Avenue along Countryside Park. The top photograph faces south and the bottom photograph faces north. Route 5F is proposed on the west side of Tracy Avenue along Countryside Park. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $2,600,000 N A i Legend ——�f CAy boundary ^,� Selected Route 6 :a5 aeo 9b Parcels - Mennepin ., AlleinaWe Trail Roules :;.ey W Edl- Property SReam Edlna School 6lsftKt Properfq Wettandi. 2. Lakes •�-+� a Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 39 Route 5F Assessment, cont'd Bredesen Park > Olinger Boulevard > Tracy Avenue > Countryside Park > Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 2 Number of residential back yards 11 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Reduce shoulder width along Tracy Avenue. Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 3 Speed limit of roads 3 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 2 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 7,000 - 9,0000 vehicles /day Functional Class 2 local road 1 collector road 40 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 134' Average distance from house to property line 130' Number of houses < 25 feet 50' Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi- family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 1 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 1 KOute 5F Assessment, c t® Bredesen Park > Olinger Boulevard > Tracy Avenue >.Countryside Park > Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road CAT Design Recommendations Route 5F recommendations include considering shifting the route by the Colonial Church and proposed assisted living facility on Colonial Way and avoiding the Olinger Boulevard /Tracy Avenue intersection. The Olinger Boulevard /Tracy Avenue intersection is busy and potentially dangerous during baseball games at the park .due to cars parked on the side of the street.. The church route is already used by residents accessing Bredesen Park, has less traffic, and avoids the Tracy Avenue intersection at Olinger Boulevard. In addition, it is recommended to route the trail on the east side of Tracy Ave (at Highway 62) and follow the existing pedestrian path over Highway 62. Additional CAT Member Narrative Due to the timing of when Route 5F was introduced for consideration, a neighborhood representative was not included in the CAT and therefore additional CAT Member comments were not received. This page left intentionally blank. Route 7 Assessment Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road > Antrim Road Overview Route 7 starts at Tracy Avenue and heads south along the east side of Valley View Road. The route is proposed within existing right -of -way; however, road reconstruction to reduce shoulder width is proposed. Route 7 ends at Antrim Road. The above photographs are taken along Valley View Road. The trail is proposed on the east side where a sidewalk currently exists. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $600,000 R Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 7 Legend '2 c[y Boundary -% , Selected Roane o tso W as Parcels - Hennepe Aft—NoTlaa Routes C4 of Enna Property sbeam _ Edina Scrwa Dretrf:t Property MtNrwa LaMes • ^'^°' e Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 43 Route 7 Assessment, cont'd Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road > Antrim Road Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 2 Number of residential side yards 7 Number of residential back yards 9 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Reduce shoulder width and /or remove park lane along Valley View Road. Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 5 Speed limit of roads 5 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 5 at <5,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 5 local road 44 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy ). Average distance from house to trail 60' Average distance from house to property line 30' Number of houses < 25 feet 2 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 4 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 4 Route 7 Assessment, c®n ® Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road > Antrim Road CAT Design Recommendations Route 7 recommendations include improving the Antrim Road and Valley View Road intersection to allow safe pedestrian /bicycle movement to Edina middle and high schools from the regional trail. In addition it is recommended to design the trail in a manner to reduce vehicular speeds and increase safety in the neighborhood. The east side of Valley View Road appears more feasible as it already has a sidewalk and as a result, the residents and community are familiar. with pedestrians and bikes on the east side of the street. The west side of Valley View Road was eliminated from further study due to limited available road shoulder and steep roadside embankments. Additional CAT Member Narrative No additional CAT Member comments were received. This page left intentionally blank. Route 8 Assessment Valley View Road > Antrim Road > 70th Street > Nine Mile Creek Overview Route 8 begins at Valley View Road and includes four variations, all of which are proposed within existing public right -of -way and proposed road reconstruction to remove one parking lane and /or reduce shoulder width. Route 8 ends at Nine Mile Creek. Route 8 -1 is proposed along the west side of Antrim Road and north side of 70th Street. Route 8 -2 is proposed along the west side of Antrim Road and south side of 70th Street. Route 8 -3 is proposed along the east side of Antrim Road and north side of 70th Street. Route 8 -4 is proposed along the east side of Antrim Road and south side of 70th Street. The design recommendation for Route 8 is to locate the trail on the east side of Antrim (lower photo) and south side of 70th Street (upper photo) =, r FT E, ; Nino Me Croak Regional Trail: Alternate Route 8 Lid r U "-U IF- 43 fry R—dary .. Al. —I., Tral R.,*- :xn.,n+ 0 45 Oa 1300 Parcel, Hennepin t V.Hm— jy- V*TWl d, ( City & Edina Property ^.i R 1 V- onn Ls1ut Fd— -.7; nnni ❑¢dnr9 Prnnedv �e 8'2 V -Obull 1— 0-3 vwaoon Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimates: 8 -1 $1,700,000; 8 -2 $1,600,000; 8 -3 $1,700,000; 8 -4 $1,600,000 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 47 Route 8 -1 Assessment, cont'd Valley View Road > Antrim Road > 70th Street > Nine Mile Creek Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 44 Number of residential side yards 6 Number of residential back yards 1 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking along Antrim Road and remove one lane of parking and /or reduce shoulder depending on location along 70th Street. Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 50' Average distance from house to property line 45' Number of houses < 25 feet 1 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 10 Multi - family driveway crossings 3 Low turnover commercial crossings 1 Road Crossings High turnover commercial crossings 1 Each road crossing will result in encounters between Total driveway crossings 15 trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 5 Speed limit of roads 5 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 4 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 3 local roads 2 collector roads 48 Three Rivers Park District Route 8 -2 Assessment, cont'd Valley View Road > Antrim Road > 70th Street > Nine Mile Creek Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 9 Number of residential side yards 15 Number of residential back yards 1 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking along Antrim Road and remove one lane of parking and /or reduce shoulder depending on location along 70th Street. Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 50' Average distance from house to property line 45' Number of houses < 25 feet 1 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 10 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 3 Road Crossings High turnover commercial crossings 0 Each road crossing will result in encounters between Total driveway crossings 13 trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 9 Speed limit of roads 9 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 8 at <5,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 at 7,000 - 9,000 vehicles /day 8 local road 1 collector road Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 49 Route 8 -3 Assessment, cont'd Valley View Road > Antrim Road > 70th Street > Nine Mile Creek Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 39 Number of residential side yards 5 Number of residential back yards 1 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking along Antrim Road and remove one lane of parking and /or reduce shoulder depending on location along 70th Street. Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 50' Average distance from house to property line 45' Number of houses < 25 feet 1 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 36 Multi - family driveway crossings 4 Low turnover commercial crossings 2 Road Crossings High turnover commercial crossings 0 Each road crossing will result in encounters between Total driveway crossings 42 trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 3 Speed limit of roads 3 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 2 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 2 local roads 1 collector road 50 Three Rivers Park District Route 8 -4 Assessment, cont'd Valley View Road > Antrim Road > 70th Street > Nine Mile Creek Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 6 Number of residential side yards 12 Number of residential back yards 0 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking along Antrim Road and remove one lane of parking and /or reduce shoulder depending on location along 70th Street. Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 50' Average distance from house to property line 45' Number of houses < 25 feet 1 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 6 Multi- family driveway crossings 3 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 Road Crossings High turnover commercial crossings 1 Each road crossing will result in encounters between Total driveway crossings 10 trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 7 Speed limit of roads 7 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 5 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 5,000 - 6,999 vehicles /day 1 at 7,000 - 9,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 5 local roads 2 collector roads Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 51 Route -8 Assessment,, cont"d Valley View Road > Antrim Road > 70th Street > Nine Mile Creek CAT Design Recommendations Route 8 -4 is recommended (east on Antrim, south on 70th). It is recommended to investigate providing a connection to Lewis Park on Cahill Road. Lewis Park has parking that could be utilized for trail users and reduce potential parking impacts on 70th Street. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. 'As the Route 8 representative for the Community Assessment Team (CAT) my objective was to represent the citizens of Edina and particularly the people living on or near route 8 in an effort to evaluate each trail section based on four primary criteria, which are environmental impact, cost, neighborhood impact, and trail functionality. Unfortunately, the team was only able to evaluate the'functionality of the trail on a limited basis and primarily from the users prospective. Though promised an opportunity to review data pertaining to environmental impact, neighborhood. impact, and cost, very little of this information_ was available or provided. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet; perhaps the most important document related to the trail initiative, was not completed by the time the last CAT meeting was conducted. Therefore, it was not given consideration. Further, carbon emission, which was considered by the CAT team to be a critical part of the environmental impact evaluation criteria, was dismissed as non: quantifiable, though CO2 calculations are completed daily on all aspects of human endeavors.' Further, though the CO2 calculations were considered non - quantifiable for CAT purposes, the Three Rivers Park District and others continue to promote the trail as. "green" and claim the carbon emissions will be offset by bicycle commuters. Virtually any formula will refute this supposed fact. With regard to cost information, the CAT team was given cost estimates during its last meeting and it became evident during the meeting, that the estimates had not included critical costs or had potentially underestimated costs. However, while it was obvious there were issues with the estimates, no time for critical review of the cost information was given. Finally, there was extremely limited time between when the CAT team compiled its information and the production of the final report, leaving no time for each route representative to obtain" feedback from their constituents. Further, the final report given to the CAT for their final approval was incomplete and was missing the introduction and conclusion, making it impossible to evaluate the report. All this made it virtually impossible for the route representatives to meet their responsibilities. As a result of this process, and though a lot of good work has been done towards the CAT mission, I can not in good faith endorse any information, suggestions, or recommendations coming from the Three Rivers Park District related to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail project. It would be my recommendation that the City of Edina and its citizens use this report only in the context of trail functionality. In addition, an degis�on_ oc action,. taken b -_ the Cif _- of Edina; without. =further analysis of_ the cost no.w _alread _ - - -- - Y _ _ _—. -- - -- -- -- _ -- - - y estimated a.t $30,000,000) and environmental impact should be, considered.highly.dubious by the citizens of Edina." - Michael Wolff, Segment .8. Representative 52 Three Rivers Park District Route 9 Assessment Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road > Parkland > Heights Park Overview Route 9 begins at Tracy Avenue and generally follows the existing sidewalk adjacent Valley View Road east until the first residential property when the route leaves the road right -of -way and follows the parkland adjacent the creek. Boardwalks are proposed in wetland locations. The route is proposed to cross the creek to the south side west of Heights Park. The route ends at the existing pedestrian bridge at Heights Park. The top photo is representative of the creek corridor. The lower photo shows the existing pedestrian path near Heights Park. This pedestrian path would provide a neighborhood access point to the regional trail along this route. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 9 Legend _�..- CRy 6o—y ^I Sekfcted RWte Parcels - Nemepm Atemat— Tres Rohn Cry CO Edna Properly Stream Edens Svwoi Detract Property NMW Ws Lakes Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $600,000 0 " W 330 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 53 Route 9 Assessment, cont'd Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road > Parkland > Heights Park Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 0 Number of residential back yards 15 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 0 Speed limit of roads 0 Average annual daily traffic 0 Functional Class 0 54 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 160' Average distance from house to property line 60' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 0 Tracy Avenue > Valley View Road > Rarkland > Heights Park CAT Design Recommendations Route 9 recommendations include improving the Valley Lane bridge as the current bridge is narrow and would not adequately meet regional trail standards. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. "Sections 9 (and adjacent Section 1'1) run down a narrow band of open space where Nine Mile Creek meanders through residential communities. A regional trail in this area would be of particular concern for the impact on the environment, water quality, wildlife and residents. Water Quality concerns Currently Nine Mile Creek is listed as "impaire.d" for the pollutants chloride, turbidity, and nutrients (impaired biota). Construction of.the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional.Trail in Sections 9 and 11 is likely to encounter storm water discharge issues. Plant and Wildlife concerns The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail may adversely affect -threatened or endangered plants, as well as the habitat of threatened or endangered animals. Even if the trail does not completely destroy plant or animal habitat, the project could fragment critical habitat. Habitat fragmentation makes it difficult for threatened plants or animals to survive. Floodway concerns Because of the lack of land available between residential lots and Nine Mile Creek much of the proposed raised boardwalk will be within the floodway (the current of the creek at high water). Footing sizes, height above creek and.structural integrity will pose considerable difficulty._ Recommendation Based on the impact the Nine Mile 'Creek Regional trail would have on the -environment, alternate routes would be preferred." - Harvey Johnson, Segment 9 Representative Route 11 Assessment Heights Park > Parkland > Railroad ROW > Parkland > Abercrombie Park > 70th Street Overview Route 11 begins at the pedestrian bridge at Heights Park and follows the creek east. The route is proposed to cross the creek to the north side shortly after the existing pedestrian bridge. The route utilizes available public land adjacent the Canadian- Pacific Railroad where parkland is not available adjacent to Nine Mile Creek. A tunnel under the railroad and near the creek is proposed to facilitate safe pedestrian and bicycle movement at the railroad. The railroad trail crossing will require approval from Canadian - Pacific Railroad. The route continues east through Abercrombie Park to its end point at 70th Street. Boardwalks are proposed in wetland locations. These photos are representative of the Nine Mile Creek corridor. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $3,000,000 N A Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 11 Legend rLf_..ts__--1r.« e uo ♦w M Cny Bamdary ^� Seleaatl Roma Parcels - He n g + Aa.rnat— Trod Rams Gry M Ed.0 Property Stream Ed— Sdh DmtrK Property Mtlande Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 57 Route 11 Assessment, cont'd Heights Park > Parkland > Railroad ROW > Parkland > Abercrombie Park > 70th Street Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 4 Number of residential back yards 66 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 1 Speed limit of roads 1 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 collector road 58 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 210' Average distance from house to property line 90' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 0 Route 1 Assessment,, cont'd Heights Park > Parkland > Railroad ROW > Parkland >. Abercrombie Park > 70th Street CAT Design Recommendations Route it recommendations include incorporation of lighting in the proposed tunnel at the Canadian Pacific Railroad and protection of Monkey Village. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. "* There are 98 homes that the trail will go in its back yard not 58. * The average distance from trail to house is off also with the additional homes. * I feel the cost estimates are too low for a raised boardwalk based on my estimates. I believe the numbers are skewed that this segment is only $3,000,000. * The picture for my segment is not even of segment 11, it is of segment 9. Please change the picture. * The EAW is not part of this.and we were told we would be able to evaluate the EAW before making recommendations. Section 11 Narrative Sections 11 (and adjacent Section 9) run down-a narrow band of open space where Nine Mile Creek meanders through residential communities. A regional trail in this area would be of particular concern for the impact on the environment, water quality, wildlife and residents. Environmental concerns Section 11 contains a high quality wetland meadow. Even with the pressure of urbanization the wetland meadow is relatively intact. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail would jeopardize this fragile area. Water Quality concerns Currently Nine Mile Creek is listed as "impaired" for the pollutants chloride, turbidity, and nutrients (impaired biota). , Construction of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Sections 9 and 11 is likely to encounter storm water discharge issues: Plant and Wildlife concerns The Nine Mile Creek. Regional Trail may adversely.affect threatened or endangered plants, as well as the habitat of threatened or endangered animals. Even if the trail does not completely destroy plant or animal habitat, the project could fragment critical habitat. Habitat fragmentation makes it difficult for threatened.plants or animals to survive. Floodway concerns Because of the lack of land available between residential lots and Nine Mile Creek much of the proposed raised boardwalk will be' within the floodway- (the current of the creek at high water). Footing sizes, height above creek and structural integrity will pose considerable difficulty. Recommendation Based on the impact the Nine Mile Creek Regional . trail would have on the environment, alternate . - -_ -_ - - - -- routes .would --be-preferred: -Peter McCarthy, Segment'11- Representative Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis '59 This page left intentionally blank. ' •i t Route 13 Assessment 70th Street > Parkland > Metro Boulevard > Parkland (lake Edina) Overview Route 13 starts at 70th Street and Nine Mile Creek and follows the creek south. The route is proposed through both parkland and on the west side of Metro Boulevard right -of -way. An easement along the west side of the Gramercy Club may be required. Road reconstruction to remove one lane of parking along Metro Boulevard is proposed. Route 13 includes a new pedestrian and bicyclist bridge over Highway 100 which will connect to parkland on the west side of Lake Edina. Route 13 ends at the Lake Edina parkland. Route 13 is generally proposed on the west side of Metro Boulevard. The top photograph is representative of Metro Boulevard where parkland does not exist and where road reconstruction is proposed to accommodate the trail. The bottom photograph is representative of parkland areas adjacent to Metro Boulevard and where road reconstruction may not be required to accommodate the trail. Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: $5,600,000 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 61 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 13 Legend I-L I-La�fa t Day BQW dw y a tso you ^� selectetl Raute soa pa,uwi - Nennepn Ahernatrva 1-1 RW.. City W Edna Property stream Etl— SJroai Distna property 4venanA6 l akes Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 61 Route 13 Assessment, cont'd 70th Street > Parkland > Metro Boulevard > Parkland (Lake Edina) Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 0 Number of residential side yards 0 Number of residential back yards 1 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking along Metro Boulevard. Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 2 Speed limit of roads 2 at 30 mph or less Average annual daily traffic 1 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 5,000 - 6,999 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 local road 1 collector road 62 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 40' Average distance from house to property line 50' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 5 High turnover commercial crossings 2 Total driveway crossings 7 This page left intentionally blank. Route 19 Assessment Parkland (Lake Edina) > Fred Richards Golf Course > Parklawn Ave > Gallagher Drive > France Avenue Overview Route 19 begins at the Lake Edina parkland and includes three variations all of which are proposed within existing public right -of -way, parkland, or where the City previously obtained permission to locate the trail. The route is proposed within Highway 100 right -of -way from Lake Edina to Burgundy Condos. The route then heads east behind Burgundy Condos to the south side of Fred Richards Golf Course and north side of the Pentagon Park Redevelopment Area to Parklawn Avenue. An easement along Fred Richards Golf Course entrance may be required. Route 19 proposes road reconstruction to remove one parking lane and /or reduce shoulder width along Parklawn Avenue and Gallagher Drive. Trail users will have the option of crossing France Avenue at the existing signal at Gallagher Drive or travel one block north to a planned pedestrian /bicycle bridge. Route 19 ends at France Avenue. Route 19 -1 is proposed along the west side of Parklawn Avenue and west side of Gallagher Drive. Route 19 -2 is proposed along the west side of Parklawn Avenue and east side of Gallagher Drive. Route 19 -3 is proposed along the east side of Parklawn Avenue and east side of Gallagher Drive, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 19 Route 19 proposes utilizing Mn/ Legend ne:.,,.a rwnwn TAW flouter •r DOT right-of-way along the Highway Route 19 variation A40- 100 on -ramp (top photograph). A orESnaV,op -,. ^_'PI -- ,.�. physical barrier such as a jersey EMaS haM Uw m, AOpnry -' — IP: v.nem '-"L aP5 Vw6a+ barrier is proposed between the trail and vehicular traffic. The bottom photograph is representative of Parklawn and Gallagher Drives where the trail is proposed within public right -of -way and in association with road reconstruction to reduce parking or shoulder width on one side of the street. Economic Assessment � y • • m w M ,.a 08 Preliminary Construction Estimate: 19 -1 $2,100,000; 19 -2 $2,100,000; 19 -3 $2,200,000 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 65 Route 19- 1 Assessment, cont'd Parkland (lake Edina) > Fred Richards Golf Course > Parklawn Ave > Gallagher Drive > France Avenue Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Number of residential front yards 11 1 1 Average distance from house to trail 60' Number of residential side yards 1 Number of residential back yards 15 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking and /or reduce shoulder depending on location along Parklawn and Gallagher Drive. Average distance from house to property line 55' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi- family driveway crossings 20 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 Road Crossings High turnover commercial crossings 3 Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an Total driveway crossings 23 opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 1 Speed limit of roads 1 at 30 - 40 mph Average annual daily traffic 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 'A' minor arterial (reliever) road 66 Three Rivers Park District Route 19- 2 Assessment, cont'd Parkland (Lake Edina) > Fred Richards Golf Course > Parklawn Ave > Gallagher Drive > France Avenue Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 10 Number of residential side yards 1 Number of residential back yards 15 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking and /or reduce shoulder depending on location along Parklawn and Gallagher Drive. Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 2 Speed limit of roads 1 at 30 mph or less 1 at 31 - 40 mph Average annual daily traffic 1 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 local road 1 A' minor arterial (reliever) road Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 60' Average distance from house to property line 55' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi - family driveway crossings 18 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 2 Total driveway crossings 18 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 67 Route 19- 3 Assessment, cont'd Parkland (Lake Edina) > Fred Richards Golf Course > Parklawn Ave > Gallagher Drive > France Avenue Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 9 Number of residential side yards 1 Number of residential back yards 15 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: Remove one lane of parking and /or reduce shoulder depending on location along Parklawn and Gallagher Drive. Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 3 Speed limit of roads 2 at 30 mph or less 1 at 31 -40 mph Average annual daily traffic 2 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 2 local roads 1 'A' minor arterial (reliever) road 68 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 70' Average distance from house to property line 60' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 0 Multi- family driveway crossings 16 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 Nigh turnover commercial crossings 2 Total driveway crossings 18 KOute- 19 Assessment, cont'd Parkland (Lake Edina) > Fred Richards Golf Course > Parklawn Ave > Gallagher Drive > France Avenue CAT Design Recommendations Route 19 recommendations include minimizing park /golf course tree impact, minimizing and/ or mitigating potential landscaping impacts near apartments and working with landowners when determining final route. Route 19 -2 is recommended as it appears to have least impacts. In addition, it is recommended that a barrier be constructed between the trail along Highway 100 and adjacent homes where. vegetative screen was previously planted and proposed for removal to accommodate the trail. Additional CAT Member Narrative Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the CAT Member Narrative are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Three Rivers Park District. "Route 19 Narrative addition: Route 19 runs between Highway IOO'and France Avenue and touches a diverse assortment of.property types. Each presents unique challenges. Primary concerns for various segments of Route 19 include: 1) From' the undeveloped city parkland of Lake Edina south along the MNDOT right of way on. Highway 100, the trail abuts residential back yards, raising privacy and. safety concerns of the residents. . 2) At the Burgundy Place corner, .a narrow 90 degree turn: with limited visibility will be required. This raises safety concerns for the trail users. 3) Along the south side of the Fred Richard Golf Course there are many mature trees including spruce, oak, and maple. These trees serve as a natural screen between parkland and commercial property. It is hoped that the trees will be saved during. trail construction. 4) Parklawn and Gallagher Avenues are home to 21 multi- tenant residential buildings. Along that stretch: a. 78 on- street parking spaces will be lost. b. Within 8 tenths of a mile the trail will cross between 17 and 21 driveways. 13 to 17 of those (depending on the route) are for the parking lots of high- density residential buildings. The potential for trail user and residential vehicle traffic intersecting seems high. C. Parklawn and Gallagher Avenues currently have sidewalks and multiple bus stops. The residents would like the trail cleared in the winter to allow access to the bus stops and parking areas. This would be an additional cost to the City of Edina as Three Rivers Park District does not maintain the trail in the .winter." - Nancy Crain, Segment 19 Representative Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 69 Route 20 Assessment France Avenue > Edina Promenade > Xerxes Lane > 75th Street Overview Route 20 begins at France Avenue and uses the existing Edina Promenade and associated trail connections. The route heads east from France Avenue to Adam Hill Park where it then follows Xerxes Lane south to 75th Street and the start of the City of Richfield regional trail segment planned for construction in 2010. Two variations are proposed for Route 20 along Xerxes Avenue. Route 20 -1 is proposed along the east side of Xerxes Avenue. Route 20 -2 is proposed along the west side of Xerxes Avenue. Route 20 utilizes the existing Edina Promenade which is illustrated in the top photo. The lower photo shows Xerxes Avenue. The design recommendation is to route the trail on the west side of Xerexes Avenue (lower photo). Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 20 I Legend c•r eaw+/«r _ •p «n.n.. ttni e«..+ s•«n DvcN• - M«w•pr Routs 20 variations .vw.•a Gr or Ean• Prq«tY �,.. �t Van•nm LYef Ean• SdroW Owakr Rop«IY -_ " .4: van•tlm r f"1__r- Linn« I s xexs us aw Economic Assessment Preliminary Construction Estimate: 20 -1 $400,000; 20 -2 $400,000 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 71 Route 20 -1 Assessment, cont'd France Avenue > Edina Promenade > Xerxes Lane > 75th Street Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 9 Number of residential side yards 3 Number of residential back yards 2 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 1 Speed limit of roads 1 at 31 - 40 mph Average annual daily traffic 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 'B' minor arterial road 72 Three Rivers Park District Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 70' Average distance from house to property line 30' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 11 Multi - family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 11 Route 20 -2 Assessment, cont'd France Avenue > Edina Promenade > Xerxes lane > 75th Street Social Assessment Adjacent Residential Yards Different areas of residential property offer varying levels of privacy and access which may be altered by the trail. Number of residential front yards 7 Number of residential side yards 6 Number of residential back yards 0 Technical Assessment Space Requirements If adequate right -of -way is not available, additional easements or street redesign may be required. Proposed street redesign: N/A Road Crossings Each road crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Number of road crossings 2 Speed limit of roads 1 at 30 mph or less 1 at 31 -40 mph Average annual daily traffic 1 at <5,000 vehicles /day 1 at 9,001 - 47,000 vehicles /day Functional Class 1 local road 1 'B' minor arterial road Proximity of Adjacent Homes Homes closer to the proposed trail have greater opportunity for potential trail related impacts (visual, noise, privacy). Average distance from house to trail 70' Average distance from house to property line 50' Number of houses < 25 feet 0 Driveway Crossings Each driveway crossing will result in encounters between trail users and motorists. Each encounter creates an opportunity for an incident. Single family driveway crossings 7 Multi- family driveway crossings 0 Low turnover commercial crossings 0 High turnover commercial crossings 0 Total driveway crossings 7 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 73 Route 20 Assessment France Avenue > Edina Promenade > Xerxes Lane > 75th Street CAT Design Recommendations Route 20 -2 is recommended because .it crosses fewer driveways. Additional CAT Member Narrative No additional CAT Member comments were received. Conclusion Planning and implementation of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is in various stages. The route for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the Cities of Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield is generally established and pending construction ,whereas the route through the City of Edina is not yet determined, resulting in a critical gap in the regional trail system and a community underserved by regional trail opportunities. As currently proposed, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the City of Edina is estimated to traverse seven to eight miles and cost between $17 to $20 million to develop. As a fully developed community, implementation of a new regional trail in the City of Edina presents a set of concerns and challenges that are specific to the neighborhoods and greater community in which the trail is proposed and which must be considered throughout the planning and development process. Three Rivers Park District and the City of Edina coordinated a Community Assessment Team (CAT) to identify the concerns and challenges associated with implementing Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. After a six -month process, the CAT identified numerous social, technical, and economical considerations for evaluating the fourteen alternative trail routes. Although environmental considerations were not a primary role of the CAT, the CAT identified them as an important component in evaluating all trail routes under consideration. In addition to environmental considerations, the CAT identified the following components as the most significant items for consideration in selecting a preferred regional trail route through the City of Edina. Social Assessment Priorities: Adjacent residential yards Proximately of trail to homes Technical Assessment Priorities: Space requirements (available right -of -way) Road crossings Driveway crossings Economic Assessment Priorities: Preliminary construction estimate The CAT findings will be available for public review during a 30 -day public comment period between June 14, 2010 and July 14, 2010. Upon completion of the public comment period, the CAT findings and a summary of public comments will be forwarded to the Edina City Council and Park District Board of Commissioners for consideration in identifying the preferred regional trail route in late summer /early fall 2010. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 75 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 1 Assessment Map MINNETONKA N s e '169 L 4 cl. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 1 Legend Feet City Boundary Selected Route 0 150 300 600 Parcels- Hennepin ' �, • Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property Stream Ttiis GIs Data is pCDVrded'as Is' wehouc warrant[ of aw represenw— d accuraq, tim eiiness, a Edina School District Property Wetlands comphteness. The user acknowledges and a aepts the rimitati— pf the Data, includmg the fact that Me Data is dynamic and is in a Constant state of Lakes maintenance. care tiv and update. Map prepared by Th+ee Rivers Park D StrA Plarnin9 Section - AIS /AR Mat 25, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 77 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 2 Assessment Map _ sY v, vv't I I I I I I I IN J I ;f I I a f r _ sY v, vv't / I I I I I IN / I I I a r o S _ sY v, vv't / I I I I I r / / I I I Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 2 Legend G City Boundary Selected Route Lj Parcels- Hennepin ' `_ • Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property Stream Edina School District Property Wetlands Lakes I " U I Feet 0 250 Soo 1.000 This GIS Data R prov,ded "as is' without waraty d aw repre Cation d accuracy, Emeiiness, ur mmplemness. The user aknowledgas and amts tha limrta d the Data, including the tact tha the is Data dyn— and ,s in a constant store of maintenance, cvrethon, and update. Map prepared by Three WYers Pad Diana Manning Section - AJS /AR May 25, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 79 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 3 Assessment Map / ' PI.GrPF BLOC L / r n LJ +D4eDERM1V CR' J N `8 62 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 3 Legend 0 City Boundaries ti Selected Route I_ Parcels - Hennepin ' `, Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property Stream f ^� Edina School District Property Wetlands Lakes } Feet 0 250 500 1,000 This GIS Data is oroyided "as is" wrth.t warranty d any reP,a —[aticn d accuracy, timeliness, or cum pleteness. The user acknowledges and accepts the Iimitaticns of the Data, Including the fact Mat the Data is dynam c and is in a constant store of mant —ce, cwmMm, and update. Map prepared by Three Rivers nark Di Ana Manning Section - A15 /AR Mali 25, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 81 This page left intentionally blank. 82 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Route 4 Assessment Map I ,1 — .._TT 1- I T iA -- - Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 4 Legend City Boundary Selected Route Parcels- Hennepin '. ^ Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property Stream Edina School DistnctProperty� Wetlands Lakes Feet 0 175 350 700 TN. US cm.. —3M '.f eC wi>+ wa.�anr .f .nv •�resaNSt.M d auuraC Y t. nlevewt4, a *iktexv.. T �. — aM —k-dq— anda¢mt•. �n.�muecm dmawu, �nq the �.csttiii•- Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 83 i I ,1 — .._TT 1- I T iA -- - Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 4 Legend City Boundary Selected Route Parcels- Hennepin '. ^ Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property Stream Edina School DistnctProperty� Wetlands Lakes Feet 0 175 350 700 TN. US cm.. —3M '.f eC wi>+ wa.�anr .f .nv •�resaNSt.M d auuraC Y t. nlevewt4, a *iktexv.. T �. — aM —k-dq— anda¢mt•. �n.�muecm dmawu, �nq the �.csttiii•- Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 83 This .page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 5 Assessment Map _.__. -r.stw �•r� -r. ec - I I _ Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 5 Legend Feet r City Boundary Selected Route 0 170 340 680 Parcels - Hennepin • Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property Stream This GIS Data,s pronded'w is'wrthout warranty d any mprewitation of atwrdcy, timeliness, ur Edina School District Property Wetlands completeness. The user acknowledges and accepts the 1— taboos of the Data, including the fact that the Data is dynamic and is in a constant state of Lakes mantenance, correctlm, and update. Map prepared by Three wyers Park mstri t Ptaremq 5 e ban - A S /AR May 25, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 85 Appendix Route 5D Assessment Map Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 51) Legend City Boundaries Selected Route Parcels - Hennepin ' ` _ • Alternative Trail Routes Stream Wetlands Lakes Feet 0 100 200 400 This Gls Data s prorided "..s" with= warranty of any represetadon ut wwra y, timelines, a complateness. The user acknowledges and accepts the 1 -tabors of Me 0,91 including the /act that the Data is dynamic and is in a constar t state of maintenance, cwettipn, and update. Map prepared by Three Poyers Park Dist6ft Banning Sa[bon - 415 /AR May 24, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 87 nN' I r I 82 I 82 _1 1 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 51) Legend City Boundaries Selected Route Parcels - Hennepin ' ` _ • Alternative Trail Routes Stream Wetlands Lakes Feet 0 100 200 400 This Gls Data s prorided "..s" with= warranty of any represetadon ut wwra y, timelines, a complateness. The user acknowledges and accepts the 1 -tabors of Me 0,91 including the /act that the Data is dynamic and is in a constar t state of maintenance, cwettipn, and update. Map prepared by Three Poyers Park Dist6ft Banning Sa[bon - 415 /AR May 24, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 87 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 5E Assessment Map N A .f r Legend Feet r City Boundary Selected Route o too ,00 aoo Parcels - Hennepin , - Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property - Stream This GISDato sproymed °as is' aiMa,tw anvy ,I ary rvuriisentvu- of acM . bmBliness, V Edina School District Property Wetlands -nplane ss. The user ak.— dedwsandauepcs �✓ the lire Wons of the Data, —Ludo the fact that the _ Data Is dvna is and is in a constant state of Lakes — rtenance. come eon, and update. Map prepared by Three layers park Di tnt alanrenp Section - A75 /AR May 25, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 89 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 5F Assessment Map r vE r - ' ez JV � � I I Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 5F Legend City Boundary 0'%.o Selected Route Parcels - Hennepin ' `, • Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property U- Stream Edina School District Property Wetlands Lakes 0 gas 490 r< i, I I Feet Sao This GIS Dat— p—ded "as is' without --ty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, a mpleteness. The user akn..I d%Ws and accepts the 1— tabofns of the Data, mcludmg the fact that the Data is dynamic and is in a constant state of maintenance, ccrmcbw . and update. Map prepared by Three Mvers Park D, via Manning Section - A]S May 24, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 91 I �± r vE r - ' ez JV � � I I Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 5F Legend City Boundary 0'%.o Selected Route Parcels - Hennepin ' `, • Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property U- Stream Edina School District Property Wetlands Lakes 0 gas 490 r< i, I I Feet Sao This GIS Dat— p—ded "as is' without --ty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, a mpleteness. The user akn..I d%Ws and accepts the 1— tabofns of the Data, mcludmg the fact that the Data is dynamic and is in a constant state of maintenance, ccrmcbw . and update. Map prepared by Three Mvers Park D, via Manning Section - A]S May 24, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 91 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 7 Assessment Map t 'v Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route 7 - - -nnIN N 3 1 Legend Feet City Boundary 041%.0 Selected Route 0 150 300 600 Parcels - Hennepin ' `� . Alternative Trail Routes I City of Edina Property Stream This GIS Data is provided "as "..thout —arty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, a Edina School District Property Wetlands completeness. The user acknowledges and adepts the 1— tabons of the Data, Including the fact that the Data is dynamic and is in a consfaM state of Lakes maintenance, correction, and update. Map prepared by Three W vets Park Distnct Manning Section - A1S /AR May 25, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 93 This page left intentionally blank. - Appendix Route 8 Assessment Map 00 TI 4j 4j HMD 0 v IL 0 Om cu ut 0 Z:3 r—i 0 0 0 M M M > > C? 'T M Ob M OD oOD CL CL cu M cu M t4 w M u a- u w L -10 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 95 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 9 Assessment Map 3 w+bnam �t tt M y � o �'E uS�E IOCi O w� W I NO rs.4'.r.c c N Y L Y O cr �t tt M y � o �'E uS�E IOCi O w� W NO rs.4'.r.c c N Y L Y O cr Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 97 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 11 Assessment Map G 's Jr i 9 zi Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Alternate Route it N Legend Feet 0 220 440 880 d�j, City Boundary �l+ Selected Route c - -z Parcels - Hennepin • Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property -mss — Stream This GIS Data is orowded "as is' without waraty of any representation of —racy, timeliness, or completeness. The user ackno.ledpes and adepts Edina School District Property ' Wetlands the limitaoons of the Data, Including the fact that the Data is dynamic and is m a constant state of maintima tei, cafection, and update Lakes Map prepared by Threat Rivers Park District PI.—I Sectim - A75 1at Nay 25, 2010 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 99 This'page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 13 Assessment Map oTMSrw _ N! i 3 t Legend 10 City Boundary ON.# Selected Route Parcels - Hennepin • Alternative Trail Routes City of Edina Property - Stream I Edina School District Property ? Wetlands Lakes Feet 0 150 300 600 This GIS Data is provided 'as is" without warranty of any representation of accuracy, Omeliness, ar completeness. The user acknowledges and accepts the limitations of the Data, including the fact th at the Data is dynamic and is in a const ht state of maintenance, cprrection, and update. Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning Section - AIS/AR May 25, 2010 Nine Mite Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 101 Appendix Route 19 Assessment Map � / 11 z !•%| §<, ■! i• -« :! ! . IM )Q °k §!!7!� ■ tj E. , » ¥ $ � � 0 E f � k k k § } VII; < g 0 in « = c ( _ g g (© ' ( \ 0 - - { M : F- \ § f ] ] ) M � © 0 \ 0 u i � � » U 2 6 o ] f c a 2 % f _ 2 § o 3 d Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Com m u mty Assessment Team An» ysis 103 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Route 20 Assessment Map Q J W LL S r i I I I I I I 1 I 1 I _ I 3 1 1 Q N 3 NO LL L L Q LL r �9 C NW LL W L u cu nA u U- C) W) v c�i 0 ij! im'� �i aj Nm3 �ID8 �' ii�F�A� a o��som m �o gt5 �CYSoE ZOffZ E C N � � W d y s J N 3 O VI O H O O L 6 N 6 O N a Q y l 0 l 7 r O T C Ul O T a C Y U O p N_ W T C a 0 6 = C O L U p 'n W � m U O M C U 2 U W Ql Gr J Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 105 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Social, Technical & Economic Assessment Methodology The following methodology explains how the findings of the social, technical, and economic assessments were generated when not otherwise apparent. Social Assessment Service Area Population Service area population data is a measurement of population within three - fourths mile of the trail route. The population data was obtained using 2006 US Census data and is approximate due to the geography of US Census blocks. Adjacent Properties Adjacent residential yards include all adjacent residential parcels. Residential yards were identified and inventoried by means of Hennepin County parcel data and 2006 aerial photography. Residential properties that were not immediately adjacent the proposed trail route including residential parcels across the street or railroad tracks were not inventoried. Proximity of adjacent residential properties is an average measurement of the estimated distance between the adjacent residences and proposed trail route and the estimated distance between the adjacent residences and corresponding property line. The measurements were completed using Hennepin County parcel data and 2006 aerial photography. The closest point of the adjacent residence to trail route and property line was used. Viewshed data quantifies the elevation of the trail compared to the adjacent properties. Viewshed data was classified as above grade, at grade, or below grade and was compiled using two foot contour lines provided by the City of Edina and the estimated trail elevation. Access to Trail Access to trail identifies potential trail access locations including sidewalks, roads, trails or similar infrastructure. Access locations were identified during field visits preformed in 2009 and 2010, in the City of Edina 2030 Comprehensive Plan, and through 2006 aerial photography. Parking Parking measured the available parking capacity of the various trail routes and estimated the potential parking impact as a result of trail construction and associated road reconstruction. Parking capacity and potential parking impacts were identified and inventoried through field visits in 2009 and 2010, 2006 aerial photography, and City of Edina as -built drawings for road -based routes. Parking locations document legal and reasonable parking locations with a minimum length of 22' in accordance with The Engineering Handbook 6th Edition. Areas within 30 feet of any intersection and 5 feet from any driveway were excluded from consideration as the City of Edina Ordinance restricts parking in these locations. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 107 Consistency Potential implementation and funding partnerships identify opportunities to implement and possibly fund the regional trail in conjunction with other proposed or planned improvement projects. Included opportunities are limited to those already of public record and /or plans. Since the cost estimates and details of the opportunities are generally unknown at this time, a cost savings could not be reasonably established at this time. Comprehensive planning identifies areas where the trail routes complement existing pedestrian and bicycle plans. Areas of consistency were classified as a primary, secondary, or regional trail route and reflect the route's proposed level of service. The routes were obtained from the City of Edina 2030 Comprehensive Plan and corresponding 2007 Comprehensive Bike Transportation Plan. Trees Potential impacts to woodland /forest identify the estimated acreage of woodland /forest for each trail route which would be converted to trail as a result of trail development. This data was compiled as part of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) by Bonestroo. The potential impact acreage was calculated using a 16' trail corridor and the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System data. Trees in public right -of -way that appeared to have been planted by adjacent property owners and may be significantly impacted by trail construction were individually identified and inventoried. Trees located within the estimated construction limits were identified during field visits preformed in 2009 and 2010, Hennepin County parcel data, and by using 2006 aerial.photography. Trail User Preference The number of trail stop locations - quantifies stop conditions, such. as a road crossing, along each route. Stop conditions were identified and inventoried during field visits conducted in 2009 and 2010 as well as by using 2006 aerial photography. -Trail length measures the approximate length of each trail route.. . Trail length was generated by ArcMap. Walking and Bike Access to Destinations Access to destination identifies the number of regionally significant destinations within walking (1/4 mile) and bicycling (3/4 mile) of the trail routes and associated access points. Destinations were primarily identified by the Community Assessment Team (CAT). Park District staff cross referenced . the destinations identified by th'e CAT with Hennepin County parcel data and the City of Edina Parks and Facilities map. For routes without representation or routes that CAT members did not submit destination maps; Park District staff-marked all known destinations.- Technical Assessment Space Requirements Available right -of -way is an indicator of how much land is available for trail construction and is the measurement from back of curb to the public right -of -way boundary. Available right -of -way was measured from as -built drawings provided by the City of Edina when available. In locations without as -built drawings, right -of -way was estimated using field work in 2009 and 2010,. Hennepin County aecel:' data `and_ =,2006 aer- .ial.: hoto ra b 108 Three Rivers Park District Physical Obstacles Utility locations identify the type and frequency of existing utilities which may be located within the trail corridor. Utilities were identified and inventoried during 2009 and 2010 field work and from- City of Edina GIS data. Data includes electric poles, electric boxes, communication boxes,.fire hydrants, light poles, gas line junctions, storm sewers, and sanitary sewers. Underground utility data includes only storm and water sewers and is not inclusive of all buried utilities. Safety Emergency access points identify the Locations where 'emergency vehicles could access the trail. Emergency access points were identified using existing street maps and generally include all locations where the trail route intersects a road, significant trail, or other similar access point. Driveway crossings identify each location where the trail is proposed to cross a driveway. Driveway crossings were identified and classified based on type using a combination of 2006 aerial photography and Hennepin County parcel data. Driveways were classified into one of four sub - groups: single-family, multi- family, low- turnover commercial, and high- turnover commercial based on Park District- staff's best judgment. Private roads were considered multi- family driveways due to their primary function: Road crossings' identify each location where the trail is proposed to cross a road. Road crossings were identified and inventoried using existing street maps, 2006 aerial photography, and Hennepin County parcel data. Speed limit identifies the speed of the road in which the trail route; is proposed to cross or run parallel. Speed limit data was obtained from Mn /DOT. and 2009 Metropolitan - Council Data: "TLG Street Centerline and Address Range." Average annual daily traffic (AADT) identifies the average traffic frequency of the roads the trail -is proposed to cross or run parallel. AADT was obtained from Mn /DOT and.. Metropolitan Council data. and represents data collected in 2006 and 2007. ADDT was classified into logical divisions which complement engineering design standards. Road functional classification identifies the type of road the trail route "is.proposed to cross or run parallel.. Road functional classification data was obtained from the City of Edina 2030 Comprehensive. Plan. Economic Assessment The economic assessment includes a preliminary planning estimate for construction of each trail route. All quantities were estimated from,field.collection data and all'unit prices are based on similar Park District projects and industry standards. All trail construction related expenses including paving, grading, clearing and grubbing, - bridges, boardwalks, tunnels, restoration, signage, and associated consulting services are included in the estimates. Costs for land acquisition were not included in the preliminary planning estimate. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail- Co- mmunity.Asse.ssmentTeam Analysis 109 This page left intentionally blank. Appendix Social Assessment, Routes 1 - 5F Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 111 m ao _ o E E `a s N a ° r v a a AFC = m E °_ 1 00 0 s z r =s d c ea v Aa E E E C E E - < E Ev — — o a E E E Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 111 Appendix Social Assessment, EO n['d Routes l- 5F 112 Thee Rives Par District _ \k1 , !\i!f \k�2k r L T o [ \)ko / o l�a ;r lk, =� - � f lk7 [ f)! §k § \ o 0 J - _ \§ , !§ §| {)� - - ) 2 EL |f{ } ;t77 /\ : 2 } »k #{ \ \(� ƒ r! } `` E' ■ �` { ( k #! - _ ; 7{ �w \ • o \E x -_ k# - - _ - ' - i { !° E | - ,,, - = |a� - _ \ \ U = / } : 9\ ! } \ _ } [ - }/3/ . /) v | } 3 /j } )wL } 112 Thee Rives Par District Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 1 - 5F Q Y Y K N Y K J K O M I M ry m O O C N Y O C O Q v Cc _ Q o c. _ Q v o O "c E 00 I IC o - E ° c E o e o _ c - _ o « c _ — m Y Y u " — _ _ I _ o = vn° = vE M %E v %A % A o Y m1: �n n'oc woinm Fw ; O Or�.2�nn w�umrw 3:1 O Orm Fin is w oc nm w 3 0 0 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 113 Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 1 - 5F 114 Three Rivers Park District over v u = .2 Ev m 0 _ u w E a y _ _ A 5 o a` o v o n n - u u � a u o a v m > 4 z i i o °o 0 N V U Y2 J O - _ ° yy N O � >Y a Z a n e ° s "e u N u N ° �y Tom' -..ES y�J O uri N _p c v��� •uN L g y p A N n Y N a c°> i d Y., H E '�� t 8 0° E ° u u E° u u o m N v voEE Ei� ° o c �m 12 Fo co oau u ° u A y a - E T o C t — u m c A ,o o o • 2° X vi m P a u _ y�{ ` O V L O '^9 t y o V V V v • H °° Q < zJ zJ z' `°- ° n a` a ¢ zJ y a a a E a aJ °° 114 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 1 - 5F Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - CommumtyAssessmen Tam analysis 115 ;! .- E2 |\ ) \()(\! ou mo B2 ! 2 �!«E _ )f\2 !, ()k {\§ f§ } ; 1 ! k\( ^ )\!){ { \ 9-6 f, ! • :§ ` �| _ - ■% {[! !■ ! _ _ _ ! ;E � �2 iG , ■* ) \Et _ !!!f - - }) 1 t r{|§ / §! _- Vi - ! % - - Io =| _ - 2�_ r §, 2 ! {E! { } } } r k |i ` ƒ)k k\ \ k {• ) #! ;! ;| t 2- }\r0 - /§ ,� ! # 3: !!|! ! Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - CommumtyAssessmen Tam analysis 115 Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 1 - 5F N Y K N N Y 7 ao Ld 0 L°Y 0 LE Y c F a in O ¢a U N _ as V N _ as o r o E _ w C o E o o c E o A - - C o a A - O O N E ✓ O E O O °n m E �.Q oa o o a + x A o + x q o +° o M oa N V C 1 9 u Y o <o E m ova = ` °'� Ego�a� v = E mF. tnn z wo[a mHw 3 o OF3 �La o[ wKamFw 3 O OtiYf -�aK w oY[ —m 1`- w 3 O Oti 116 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 7 - 11 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 117 o e o co 0 0 0 0 A q o ri N a Z Q Z N y 0 N q Y L 0 G n - E v Y m d q° E n •- v E N V T v u q 'O L 10 p O Y 7 U O 0 0 M O O O ° g p �o v O a u L_ N O Q Q L O > U Y ¢ a O z z It n a 00 ory O m n b N in O moo° O O ° O ti o m rn N Y 7 C p L ¢ z Q Z a 2 M W Y 7 O C 00 Y °1 ° 0 N n ao ¢ 2 o Q z ¢ z O C. N � Y 7 O K N p L m Q z N v o o O O Q z Q z v O a N V O KNr O L M ao a z a z a z O � Y 7 O K d n d a y Ic n a z O N R O O O a z Q z O b N N E w C n o t d c _QO c i oCE vmq E:: v u> " Ev Bv� wn::Ad Nq E opt yc3 uvoa mcdo nc._. -, woyL qOW �nh m qN c ou c0, yEdq �_aq c3y"'N C Z'N'm O q mu`c O .t+ m� d O> a-q N L mo uYiu ._ 'cu ATU q 0Emn �Unv N 3 0 p 0 gnOia i Q T r. o Y > .+ u _ T °vE O v `1 q N T Y L > O C a Y > q L m E g N q N C C Vi n q Q- N 01- q O C >, O 0Cr C :+ cn Y Uq� " E ACd coE0 v y 0 g000 u.my anc >,n ` ., ma wvT� CuE o�EE um c uLC_ > w0 vY> mom= � u T� 100 mE w m0 o �'^t mY `�O��ry C as ]« L ypn -2E' m N N n >_qY O =_ `+ n 'u° y o u `do�Y E— Y W .. ` m _ ip v °c E v me Q y u a q u O . y VI Ul 8 O o J W U a -off.°: d d q J U>> oAppL 2 w G m? H 6 C E A F E N N LL C O �u J q �w'°i « q q vv q c N o N W A` N V E Y O L 0 Y 0 Y vo Y E Y I� C 25 q q q N o !!� e) A O O VI A A = W O E > C Y C Y w .0 d W v W '� C .0 7 y Y y U Y «« - .`. O C O T u d o at+ C io U C 3 6 q v yOy Z O O q C q i c 0 e — �`oo o �Ey E Gw. q ,2N �i n u� Y w Y `y `Y v Y 'c 'C 'c a+r E rn rnY N A ., m u° yo, ° a i-°. c > 9v m mg E E E mraY_EL'x @ L°L�3uu u u L= d t w Yw v VI Q a 2 Rzz z Q F o F U n 6 ¢ Q nz7oa a 4 E q ¢ ¢ a 6a u Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 117 Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 7 - 11 118 Three Rivers Park District t+ OJ C tl/ O O ry N j ON M OM.r Ilt i0 O O N N O O 0- U r u J E U N L d A e A C 1 ~ a C y Ol D W Y O N N d N E e y O d d Q N 0 %a, 01 0 u C A g 0 u3u$in 6 L �+ O A= ah O u in '7 L O U _ u 0 > q O Q 5 g 8 Q r M1a'1 C 16 O N e? ry t E e Y OEI ap: n� N O 83 Ual 8 A6w U y z ti J d o o W E Q n d 0 O d y z ti � A O c a D oc E 'rn v CO d Q z p d a.. 0 � C y— z M o N aD y o A 0 8 K �c a Q 9 o Q VI V � W ti .+ M M •+ N N Vf � O O O M 06 y O N N � m c a 0 0 E� a Q 2 W 0 0 Q a v -M oo 0 N M a o 0 o M Y � r 7 r o N K E o a Q am Dm 0 O 2 N W 3 c E y q ip Y � 8— > > J c W a0. a E d rna�.. . ,u — 2 v 'C 8 L Y a .0 O 8 O a = O N d N N t q O' U y C d 010 L 0! yp g T C N y 0 0 . D n Y N C C O v d O L D y D U J O� O— Ec °0q O G O) J C ar�n1O u `O N 2 N 0! 3 Ja,E Y N �'" N CT yyy��c O N E N 0 01 p p 0 Y u yaw L ynw N L V uyu O N J d V n f a E 3 5 n o u n, n F� F c u�° o a w c Dc m to ry w mrn Oy .0•� c n w c E c o d a y m L D +' O D C o E iw u d c o a pp A a O y C _ N E D� O Y v E V N j C 0 0 u N n A d .. C �;qq y N a9 V Lll W C L; C u c E° ad+ y� mo goo Ea 'm° 0 L. S ie dn3o EAOF w " "n 2 E T-F �w v gLL^ v, c c y"0i`2o''u rno dti C O N E= O wo O N an O a q E J A O R V N W E W = J N% ..L aw�c yv u W 0 a E O U a s UH t ate. n m f z F a 3�na� Wham H WD O O of 118 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 7 -11 N _ O -- m n O O N o OJ ] O O: Of O <Y a Co v 5 0 M M 41 7 O LY .y b N N W � O O O M O O O .+ iD ✓1 M N .+ C7 � O O O M 00 d O O O n O O O n -z Ill -w w O O O N M K N 00 0! ] O G Go d .� 10111 MN N [q �O O O O N In w O O O M N M ] O 4' n d ] MO10.++MI� V O O M O O O N M O O O O M M01 O O O O O 1 N O O' ° d o a n o av o v n D v o v n >N te > > N > N y o c o c o C p c D Ul o c D Ol c 0 c - 9 d U N U N C q U N C q U (J1 Q O) Q O) Q d a n U v n vp � O 0 0 y C O! T C K - E a E v o ~ m o l A v wv nw NON N u � c Lv no� m d C O J 0 _ � O J 'n ul u O c c O cg.0 ,O O G oC . O °i_o c oy a�0 v 0 O 0 _ N C - L L u N n E o vEw0 n aE N V dC � y n nT+ OE l o O A�3oalna�w�a m F wa O O AFiOC<in nwocam H O O mh- Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 119 Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 13 - 20 120 Three Rivers Park District a5N`EN;,P r cg c n mE 09^ E » � c U' o a � - K �u o a y = G L — S � _ m w C o ^u _ P C V ¢ v a ao 't uo d i l7 Z y V e° a o E — - _ c n a _ o 'o c o z o a> o 4Emc '",`y„ ud q' o co_ Ed u� cE E y of Y, E o ��4„E =�E rn^ E Y _ � � o o E y T m E `w o E E E K a 1°, Q o d E ; A t a 'aiz' z' a I ron`a' a y z'igo 120 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Social Assessment, QO nt'd Routes 13 - 20 Nine MHe Creek Regional Trail - Co m mumty Assessment Team Analysis 121 k�! ! ;• e ; \�\ ()\) kf ;.) (§! )| { |2 an 7|1E _[] !g% So � � „ ,|! i§ §! §) !Q =!« \/\ ` ] ƒ Io (k \�\� )/ c2, !t! 1��, )jk17t ƒ - ))k� \\ ;®| : ! - - - )��\ �\\E S o- g - \ ƒf! r1 a} ( \) \S§ �I % #E!!| ` | -- -�i - _ E |; -_ §; 131 !l� { | {. {!k / |) 2 || �.t!!! ( ° ! i+ I\ ;>2`� \ _ /£_ [ -.§ |!� ; -.! . ! < k - - -: ! |!!!f§ |�!!;\!E!! &f| |jk; /§�:7,!l ;E; ! !k � J !!{m)3 £ a,zl��z2� = =�low�a,�.��l2ezlo,oe Nine MHe Creek Regional Trail - Co m mumty Assessment Team Analysis 121 Appendix Social Assessment, cont'd Routes 13 - 20 N 0 N d a 0 d 0 0 N d 0 z M 01 d O K H � « O O ] y, O C O C O ] O O Lv 01 O Y C Y V C a VI d d _ - - <a VZd Y v _ - - ¢ a C O C O C O � A o " _ - i « o ma ..Q =quo `Q xgao u n _ - ''' c' H _ _ o' a c_ °o C _ p 3 fl V 6 w C n m. O ' O - 0 O 't w a O V O H 122 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Technical Assessment, Routes 1 -5 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 123 H o L noo oo-�v Nn :o o 3 ro c L Y v= m y c V y v E= o K °1�3 0 00o u °oo uu Q, c Q LL 1 = O C n` W R �D C `a 3 L M d Y N mio m i'a`+QC c � o yEm Ac Jain y N T C ` U G O N C M L O� O L q --loco 0 0 1 N Y 3 7 o g `c o c O 'o Q •i Q Q ro 3 Z 2 Z 2 D A O, � CIO o 0 o � O 0 O u L _ - N L � C A ti v+ o y a y 6 D p D y T q N D d y y N T O °w > U o' E c c a « N C q r c O v c o m a c c c w 3 E a o a c } u o° uD�oua Vi v -mP oDC� avE unN�c 10 j g p D O O .. V1 J m N 4' 7 d d L a g on E ' a:J ii q c c « L' L d R D a O c F c E c D v c n }! = m c= €CaC E �'- zEYiGd,nLgE a`,a5 A 4'�Y Q Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 123 Appendix Technical Assessment, cont'd Routes 1 -5 124 Three Rivers Park District w ^'1 O O O O O Q O - m u y O A > aEt\nx c � o C d C W N tV.r O K + L> �vQ o mo v .- � o E °mama f Ev o ?? c o a a Q _ W O I > C m b 2 Z y U [ U of h N 7 OD T C N N V v y ei C E m VN V U N C j > m L C J 0> O L° W W II O O C N m O P c m W O 0 E o a c o o -S .p Z; .'0 U S C ?' p v ] o v A= A m A w 3 o d m a7 n .-, > N ... M > vi N O O O O O Q Z y d Z oc C > O o V ` N C p o u y a Y p O II O H y v O ° a d L o M c C ° n o C E 0 0 _ O > n W ! u W O N t E O i _ W O o O O x 0 u OC W m V O V y O v V O O O O O Q Z N b o, VWi ? W v � C W T > m m U W S > > T W Q V L W v N U d L � O C D ili > o > O V > b L O D J D L as E Ct O V1 O V t� W d ti O W N O X D m A �O T ry ° O Vj V o v E a ,> N C c u Uyy C C CU W N d] t ] X71 y O T N v o v ; u C Y j p Y` W S m ut o' C V O �n C D O C. Z E v y O m 0 j II W D W m N" W W E E p 'y O a Cp E C C ti 0 d: sy E N .. Cd C .. O w w° d E a o° c o c o c C 3 v" 3 a ] c C E] c ] E ] C m U r J = N O A V W .✓ N N $° v O C W G W W u a o °v W C W m o II o W W m W d '0 0- Q O- 10 C W N U m C > 6 d d an d N O m E ac o v c y H m m E E E E o o a ° m D a°+ v C a y N > o $ n Y o c a D a ° 1 m a+ m L V o T > 3 J T E M 2 C A W o D C B o II E o m o E W p - E o c o C ° o- ? E o o E m - c Yo m . E > E V b E V ' J ' p Z G L C {_ 1 u O E Z J O O Z V l W 124 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Technical Assessment, cont'd Routes 1 -5 > N- Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 125 - MONO 3 S ry 3 71 C ° C O U. N ° L O N Ln O c v a> 0 CO o Q� +� 0 L c > a s in > a A C l N a V Z a W Y N 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A O M C C a N C 0 v q - 0 rt D3 L ` O � O 0 0 O, Z Z Z Z 4 O r Y O j O O N O O O O O N Yf d ; O 3 Q u no O T v c � c c m � y u a ^ a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vv ? � V A > = D Y d > ? p D d O y ` _ h cri K v > 0 3 v ° D p D rn n 3 0 0 0 z c N z.0 n v v > n o c c c o u E m Y� C N c c o w 9 C> 6 c o a m o m Q w° v v 0 a « in D a £ C m ° ° o a c o 0 o c U r o e Q iv c Q v o, m ui oy�a D y u T a,mE u, v v oo v E v V o. 3 a w 0 `� g C Ip a C_ v O L O = O� O a ° u U 3 E M v° ;n o.0 ate.? ° C o u C c v E 6 ` v c c > O v d j o °' Cr y u v u C y E N x ° D .�.. E v 0 E „ o V a.E G c w a c d o 0 v 3 C t E $ o D oL CL 3. _ v N 5 Qj ° o O N > O C �0 V t y L« O N 01 v 3Lr rp p F d a v N a d a O. Y a IL w w Lf �cnH Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 125 Appendix Technical Assessment, cont'd Routes 1 -5 126 Three Rivers Park District > V 10 M O O O Q Z M > > > T as n > N V D > v a N N d d °3 U �� �v V U -C LA V a > v 0 > > ? a O N uO Q O`O O NI.J > O >O ,9y O+O L O O O O - c y o 0 OE I O 0 0 V == ° 0 U 0 0 O O v a C M V U U> �O N N O ° U z f v io is O 6 Ql Q M N -+ N -+ O O M ^'1 CU O N O O O O O Q � Z L E m q A O of W W C d N O y N O v. d O N 7! C O A A a J T L O L C A O! ca O p O °C A01> a E °oN ° v c o v > d — Z Z z M O O O Q, O Z O V Y ~ y > Ln C O n° O - ¢ d 0 N v E o v > v o � C A c o n r `o OO > 9' a q 0 'O o o > O y y 0 x > `O `0 LV o c o w a w .-, > M n > --� 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ o~ a v a z nD o � in Q N 10 3 o > O a i oC = T o C L ! 7 Q ¢ Q Q Q Q O. VOI Z Z z z z Z v 0 9'^C c y > E , y v C ; M C u ` 7 0 T °° �� a L 'o C E N A N m V V y a N� Y �p d � C d E' V „ _ O W C '; d 1 N d c >' 4J ? C N 0 0? C�LI � O 7 c2 o o u v m ; c m u u ti u y ° u is CA C C H q C N N 0 C Vi 0 p ✓=i N C D C N N C 7 r y O` d '�' C O C N 7 L d Y= w- v 0 o� v �� ? u y" V- ° c °o v M, W 0 U CI 0 v LL y� '0 N a.. LL UM W 3 D E w 0 W i+ D E Q1 O C CI a 0 D E C 01 N N C C L U C V OV i0 N U Ti N ti C V C7 O N C �- C O 6l Oi E Q N Oi C L 'N E E EO C O d N `O iC d Q: _u C A Qj H U E° > N �1 > v` O V U d u 0 .N c o N V � c o C m S v p v v > N v y a V , ° > 3 0 0 'y c M C M E O N F > C u > .E > N O `p C ;u ` O O O` Z ° y L q CO A = C C OiQ -y E y U > rn N., �� D .� E D� �Eaa 2 `a nm q v1 m A 0 o z a c ` c n 5 E 3�L 0° uS 9' 0 u� 0 >> z Ea o> CL > a 0 LL c <¢ a m a v a �o as 126 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Technical Assessment, cont'd Routes 7 -11 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 127 e= o �ym a e a` a a i a a o v v - ��gaoc_ a E N - eC a a� - Ej a n P c- a a u .. m u `o em - w a a n E e n v a a� na�n i E c- E a a n E y g w o a ° c 3 � o' E > rn o a a = ' �3go a G; H c o c d iC H .°-J t o ;a > o o n °y c $ c q - u o i • - cog o G f N Q 6 6] U w W UI U�' li VI VI H Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 127 Appendix Technical Assessment, cont'd Routes 7 -11 128 Three Rivers Park District L a �i Y R e xC p BYx�:'g i i z — a °oE c 4 s'_ j 7 R Q n g� 4 'L<c r,r, q e o o o o L 5� qkp COq 5 O + - Y i0 �g P O p n N x O O e O O c O i o � m o o a 3 o c y Q V 7 Q < P [pf N N c w� N ° _ 4 � ° v �YY Y"Yq � „✓q �r g u' 4y c L ' °� ^.,a 4.L. F s E E� Cz o 128 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Technical Assessment, cont'd Routes 13- 20 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 129 O O O - -OOP ry M M j j E N p ~ a 2 a 2 X a 2 Q 2 C C a V d X 4 A t 0 q O P b q 9 0 P OL qCq O' LL lilt b A L ° O P x� `w C, � R .. c o 12. c q b b O Y V C d a all; o N M 3 2 � O N ^ 0! C b q OC g060 r m S i gp 0 c b p 3 r 000v �,v ry S�v'_`' a auP ocooi� i o� °o ��g p iv iry i°oa ; � nuLi a n rv�ooN No c o P Q o O 1- E O C P 3 b L D o c c r c E b v > b r o —gin ;tw opp°n S �> N N C) g U Q N o Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 129 Appendix Technical Assessment, cont'd Routes 13- 20 130 Three Rivers Park District _ n 8 X °m i A a 5 0 i rl V A V N g dyo ug'cYaci � rn P r gym° Fy g N • b o _ o o o °o co m u .� i. a o;_oC O ry pGEb ^ C V c c�6 ' mX b° e yy o f> N X v ° q t X B i ccCC�Y"'cq n ct a-0' E ov<x013g € N ° jN d ✓ r 7 ' b cc b _ � V L •i - » 0 w n n v d o f C N N oz V A N myO< i i A � o yp• pp G d 6 N C> N ry Y �> `1 ry CI > t f•1 Q O P V b N N O Op O O c > N > CJ n b o Arc b y vv q Q L b 0 < b A O > �E _ ia`r inw�vOO�'B E f3 °oD c� o E o c P > M q V N O O N O r1 N °,•' H L N• b D c K 1pAnc c c�j o on P U O p it P 6 W m Y i M Q O 'U ° A G T N N C O Y Z N o 7 O C pp p _ C x OL 3 b => b 8 8'xIz� A A A a -� �m 3 P > P.'2- A C V c o ti b q [ �oT n�n lqi U c g Va p -I. c µ = c °c c❑❑ y pM C v G c U A U M C E q C O O O O A= j g?H2 c'"cc r > °Vc=� myc� c�c g a i E v E b- E ° Noo >E v uE f o y C A C o c g r c ioEN4♦yo C c D cc !. y c a =� 29s ;E0i2D ��Z a <a °n<� 130 Three Rivers Park District Appendix Economic Assessment Route Preliminary Planning Trail Construction Estimate Route 1 $1,300,000 Route 2 $2,400,000 Route 3 $1,600,000 Route 4 $800,000 Route 5 $2,700,000 Route SD $1,000,000 Route SE $1,100,000 Route SF $2,600,000 Route 7 $600,000 Route 8 -1 $1,700,000 Route 8 -2 $1,600,000 Route 8 -3 $1,700,000 Route 8 -4 $1,600,000 Route 9 $600,000 Route 11 $3,000,000 Route 13 $5,600,000 Route 19 -1 $2,100,000 Route 19 -2 $2,100,000 Route 19 -3 $2,200,000 Route 20 -1 $400,000 Route 20 -2 $400,000 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Community Assessment Team Analysis 131 i Edina Public Art Committee - MINUTES - 5/06110 Mayor's Conference Room, Edina City Hall 4pm Present: Brad Benn, Dick Crockett, Rick Fesler, Amy Kerber, Linda Kieffer, Bill McCabe, Lois Ring, Anne Spooner & Ruth Valgemae. Not present: Bernice Amacher April 2010 MINUTES approved. FINANCE REPORT Lois Ring went to John Wallin's office to obtain the financial update. The report presented showed $310 balance in our account. Linda Kieffer will study as it appeared the WaterBill /Stained Glass payment arrangement was not taken into account. Dick Crockett reported that the status of Community Foundation account is being reviewed. Follow up will be reported. CONTINUING BUSINESS EPAC has agreed to participate in the Recycling Bin Project. The Edina Energy and Recycling Commission will handle the fund - raising through sponsorship. EPAC will prepare a request for proposals and send to artists from EPAC's and EAC's mailing lists. EPAC will also write the artists' contracts and arrange for a judging committee. The deadline for this completed project is July 2011. Linda Kieffer will contact Dianne Plunckett Latham for additional information. Brad Benn announced that two sculptures; Bridled Spirit and Head of St. Joseph are already installed at Grandview with more to follow at the Promenade. Brad Benn also presented a new artist line -up for the voting ballot. Motion carried, new ballot approved. However, it is incomplete -more to follow. Lois Ring moved to serve lemonade at the upcoming artist reception. Motion carried. Anne Spooner reported the bicycle mosaics are nearly done and can be included as part of the reception. Approval of an artist reception for the 2010 Sculpture unveiling will be Wed. June 16, 4:30pm. Anne Spooner confirmed that EAC will send an email blast about the reception. Linda Kieffer will contact Tom Shirley about using the tent again. Lois Ring will check with Jennifer Bennerotte about helping with press releases. Dick Crockett confirmed he is sending out contracts to artists for the loan program. 0 Linda Kieffer reported that there will be an article in About Town this summer about the new sculpture pieces. Lois Ring said she will contact the press for additional publicity. The website needs to be updated. Photos of the new sculptures will be taken for inclusion on the website along with images of the stained glass window. Lois Ring reported that there are 500 Public Edina Promenade brochures left which includes the Public Art Sculpture program. The new EPAC button has been approved and will be available at city hall for a suggested donation. EAC will also have some at the art center and will make a check out to the community foundation periodically. Lois Ring wishes to acknowledge Diana Hedges, Lauren Schauer and Warren Peterson for their help with the button. Lois Ring contacted Joni Bennett who may be able to help advocate for EPAC. The EAC class schedule will continue to include information on the sculptures and that the voting is currently going on. EPAC /EAC responsibilities were reviewed. It was approved that the written list below will be presented to EAC Board. It is as follows: EAC RESPONSIBILITIES: • Appoint/approve EPAC members; to include at least one current EAC board member to act as liaison between the two groups. (The liaison is charged with presenting a detailed report of all EPAC activities to the EAC board). • Invite EPAC members to gallery openings and all EAC sponsored community events. • Participate in public receptions /ceremonies to dedicate public art projects. • Initiate one fund - raiser per year which will benefit EAC /EPAC; approve /manage fund - raising efforts for joint EAC /EPAC projects. • Promote EPAC projects (e.g. information in class schedules, flyers posted, information at front desk, sell EPAC buttons etc.) • Communicate with EPAC re: contact with major donor prospects to avoid duplicating solicitation efforts. • Periodically report to the City Council on matters pertaining to public art in Edina. EPAC RESPONSIBILITIES: Initiate ideas /projects for art in the City's public places. Accept, manage and execute public art projects that the City and civic organizations propose. Write and distribute all RFPs (Request for Proposals) and RFQs (Request for Qualifications) for EPAC projects. • Review and select artists' proposals for public art projects. • Handle all artist contracts relating to public art projects. • Write and distribute promotional and marketing materials relating to EPAC projects to the public. • Manage fund - raising efforts (writing and distribution of letters, materials) handled through the Edina Community Foundation. • Communicate with EAC re: contact with major donor prospects to avoid duplicating solicitation efforts. Lois Ring suggested creating a packet that reflects the goals of EPAC and EAC and also suggested having one standard letter that is an initial introduction to present to donors. Linda Kieffer reported that the Edina Rotary request for funding was turned down due to funding shortages. Discussion followed about organizing an Edina community -wide garage sale to raise funds to benefit EPAC. No decision made at this time. NEW BUSINESS Linda Kieffer will speak about The Percent for Art Program at the June meeting and also reported that she will be resigning from her EPAC post in August, 2010. Meeting adjourned at 5:30pm. Minutes submitted by Anne Spooner Next meeting will be June 3, 2010 @ 4pm Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Energy and Environment Commission Edina City Hall Community Room Thursday, May 13, 2010, 7:00 P.M. 1. Welcome, Call to Order and Roll Call (2 min) —Chair comment on revised public meeting procedures above Chair Latham called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Latham, Paterlini, Platteter, Thompson, Gubrud, Tucker, Lee (7:20), Sierks (7:40), Risser (7:50) Staff: Worthington (7:10) Absent: Hanson, lyer 2. Approval of Agenda and Topic Time Allocation (5 min) The agenda was approved as written, with one addition, "Selection of Working Group Chairs" as the final item. 3. Approval of March 4 minutes (3 min) The March 4th minutes were approved. 4. Community Comment (10 min) There was no one present for community comment. 5. Chair Report (10 min) Welcome new Commissioners; Amended Student Ordinance; City Manager Search Process (7:00 May 19 City Mgr Input by residents); April 26 panel discussion at Golden Valley City Hall; NEMO workshop — When after July 12?; Policy needed on Working Group meeting locations Chair Latham reported on the NEMO workshop, and the Commission decided to pursue that in September, either the week of the 20th or 27th. Commissioners will check calendars and confirm the date /time in June. Chair Latham presented the policy on working group meeting locations. Commissioner Paterlini made a motion that working groups are required to meet in city -owned facilities, and that meetings will be posted by city staff; seconded by Gubrud. Unanimous approval. 6. Education Outreach Working Group Report — Paul (10 Min) Report on April 20 Roundtable; 3 I of July Parade Plans Sun Current Article Schedule — Jim Jones Commercial Recycling; Julie Mellum 'Scented Laundry Fresheners', Volunteer Recruitment for WG's Commissioner Thompson reported that the EOWG has applied to be a part of the July 3'd parade. They are working with Jennifer Bennerotte on the Home Energy Squad Flyer for the Morningside /Highlands neighborhoods, and will seek endorsement by the City Council at their June 81h meeting. He also reported on the annual Bike Ride with the Mayor, May 27th at 4:45 p.m. at Bush Lake Park. Riders will meet in the parking lot at the lake, and then ride to Quality Bicycle for a tour of the facility. Commissioner Thompson also reminded commissioners to try to attend the next East Metro Roundtable, May 17th in Oak Park Heights. He also told the EEC that he will be attending a Project Earth meeting at EHS next week to identify youth commissioners to replace Hailey Lee, whose last meeting is the May meeting. Commissioners recognized Commissioner Lee with applause and appreciation for her service. She will be attending Wellesley College next year. Chair Latham asked if there was a motion to support the Sun Current article for recruiting new members for the working groups. Motion by Gubrud, seconded by Tucker, to approve article for EEC volunteers. Unanimous approval. Chair Latham then asked if there was a motion of support for Julie Mellum's article on fragrance. Several commissioners expressed discomfort with the advocacy tone of the article, and a concern that it did not follow their general policy of a focus on educating the reader, rather than advocating for a specific outcome or position. Commissioner Platteter made a motion that the article not be endorsed, as it is written as an opinion; seconded by Commissioner Sierks. Unanimous approval. Commissioner Latham suggested that the Policy and Project Working Group come up with guidelines for future articles. 7. Residential Energy Project — Bill Sierks, Michael Platteter, Paul Thompson Commissioner Platteter reported that the meetings with Xcel Energy and Centerpoint Energy are continuing, and that he hopes to have Council endorsement for the neighborhood outreach program, and flyers by the June gth Council meeting. He clarified that while the program will be available citywide, it will be focused initially on the Morningside and Highlands neighborhoods because those areas already have organizations in place to assist with outreach. Commissioner Platteter also reported on the Small Area Guide Plan Process at the request of Chair Latham. He explained that the month -long process had been very fruitful, and that the Community Advisory Team and Design Team had developed a set of guiding principles, as well as a vision for the area. Commissioner Risser asked if the Design Team architects had been identified by their employer. Worthington explained that neither the Community Advisory Team or Design Team members had been identified by their employers, as they were resident volunteers. Commissioner Risser asked if that information was available, and Worthington said she would e-mail it to her. 8. Staff Report (10 min) — May USGBC Conference (City sending Heather Worthington); Public Work Site Small Area Guide Process update; Business Cards (Jane to bring sample of a blank card), GreenSteps update; LHB Corp. recommendation; Product Stewardship Resolution Status. Worthington reported on the Green Steps "Pilot within a Pilot" program, and informed the EEC that the cost of the pilot came in at $15- $16,000, so she would not be recommending it at this point. Commissioner Paterlini asked what the pilot would encompass, and Worthington responded that it would be citywide, and community - wide data. Paterlini mentioned that much of that work had already been done, and that the other software products available may be a good alternative to additional consultant work. Worthington also confirmed that she will be attending the USGBC Conference May 19 -21. 9. GreenStep — Commissioners would like a meeting with their GreenStep counterparts — When? (5 min); See revised Air Quality step in packet. Worthington reported that she will inquire with Kristina Smitten about the possibility of hosting a meeting with the other Green Step Cities. She will follow up with the EEC in June. 10. Green Step Pilot 1 p. Reports Efficient and Healthy Development Patterns — dropped BP 15 Commissioner Paterlini presented her report. She asked that the Commission endorse Substeps 1 and 9, plus one additional step chosen by Green Steps Program. BP 15.2 Commissioner Paterlini recommended that this step should be moved to #25, Renewable Energy. Commissioners discussed the placement of a ground- source heat pump system in this category, and clarified that technically, what the City has installed is a ground source heat pump system —not geothermal. Geothermal is more correctly a conservation strategy as it does not generate energy. Wind, solar and other methods are renewable, as they generate energy, and do not use energy for that generation. Commissioner Risser recommended that the EEC determine the payback on the ground source heat pump at Public Works, and then replace that with a carbon offset of some kind after the payback. Commissioner Sierks mentioned that greenhouse gas measurements include community emissions, not just city -owned facilities —so the EEC should also look at energy efficiency. He cited Windsource (Xcel) as a good program. BP 16 Chair Latham reported that the Urban Forest Task Force has been meeting and has developed the following substeps for the goal: Tree City designation Changing the local ordinance with regard to tree preservation Establishing landscaping standards The UFTF will present the full policy at a future EEC meeting. BP 17 Worthington presented her report on the Storm Water Management issue. She recommended that since the City is part of two Watershed Districts that have jurisdiction over storm water, that the best practice be eliminated. BP 18 Green Infrastructure— Commissioner Latham presented – The following steps were selected: Na Low Maintenance Naive Landscaping; #6b Organic or Integrated Pest Management for which Commissioner Paterlini will chair a task force to update the Turf Management Plan; #6c Sources of non potable water for irrigation; #7 Certify Golf Courses for Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary – Worthington confirmed that Fred Richards golf course was already certified as well as Braemar; #9 Community program for land restoration and stewardsharp. BP 23 Commissioner Paterlini presented Benchmarks and Community Engagement. She suggested that the City pursue ICLEI Milestone 1 and 2 as part of this step. She also noted a conflict in that substep 2 conflicts with BP 23, so that substep should be moved to BP 2. Substep 5 should also be moved to BP 2. Commissioner Paterlini will make the changes and re -send the report. She also noted that substep 2 is too involved, and should be trimmed. BP 24 Green Business Development: Commissioner Sierks noted that a long -term goal has yet to be chosen, and recommended working with the Edina Chamber of Commerce to encourage use of the EnergySmart program sponsored by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce to get Edina businesses to focus on energy efficiency. BP 25 Commissioners discussed the possibility of solar panels, wind, a 20 Kwh solar array, and the possibility of utilizing federal stimulus dollars for installation. Ideally the project would include one city -owned facility, and one school -owned facility. Worthington will work with the school district to find out if they will partner with the city on this project. 11. Future Meeting (s) —June 10, 2010; The tentative June 15 City Council Work Session was changed to July 6; Nov. 11 meeting has been moved to Nov. 18 in Mayor's Conference Rm 12. Commission Working Group Chair appointments Chair Latham made the following recommendations to the EEC for working group chairs: Education and Outreach: Gubrud and Thompson Recycling and Solid Waste: Latham Air and Water Quality: Tucker Alternative Energy: lyer Motion by Paterlini to accept slate, seconded by Thompson. Commissioner Sierks. expressed his discomfort with appointing Commissioner lyer as the Chair without consultation with Commissioner Hanson. He expressed a desire to see Commissioner Hanson co -chair the committee with Commissioner lyer. 2 ayes, 7 nays, motion failed. Commissioner Platteter expressed a desire to vote on each appointment separately. The following motions were made: EOWG Paterlini, Tucker seconded. Unanimous approval RSWG Gubrud, Thompson seconded. Unanimous approval AWQWG Gubrud, Thompson seconded. Unanimous approval Alt. Energy Risser, Paterlini seconded. After extensive discussion amongst the Commissioners, Risser withdrew the motion, and suggested that it be laid over to the June meeting. Chair Latham will discuss the co -chair recommendation with Commissioner Hanson and Commissioner lyer. The Commissioners had consensus on this point. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heather Worthington, Staff Liaison