Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010-07-06_COUNCIL MEETING
a i oe •j • l Ba iCn y/, REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Work Session From: Heather Worthington Staff Liaison, EEC F-1 Action ® Discussion ® Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Joint work session with EEC to discuss Green Step Cities Please find attached the Energy and Environment Commission's report on the Green Step Cities Pilot. The following items are scheduled for discussion this evening: 1. Discussion of Green Steps Report and recommendations from EEC 2. Discussion of EPA Grant —solar project I - ' & AY cn 0 NTU ` ' Cities w City of Edina Energy and Environment Commission / \ \ \ ` ' Cities w City of Edina Energy and Environment Commission City of Edina , Green Step Cities Pilot Report OVERVIEW: On October 9th, Edina was selected as one of five Green Step Cities. St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Falcon Heights and Victoria were also selected. Staff, Commissions, and the City Council will work jointly on this project, with the assistance of Kristina Smitten, the Project Manager. The Policy Areas chosen by ULI encompass the work of several Edina Commissions, including the Energy and Environment (EEC), Planning, and Transportation Commissions, as well as the Park Board. The following background information is from the ULI website: minnesota.uli.org The Urban Land Institute Minnesota (ULI MN) and the nationally recognized Regional Council of Mayors (RCM) actively engage public and private sector leaders to foster collaboration, share knowledge and join in meaningful strategic action to create thriving, sustainable communities. Focus areas include housing, transportation, the environment and job growth. Environmental objectives include the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, protection of natural resources and the support of healthy living. To foster the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, ULI MN /RCM was selected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to demonstrate best practices from the Minnesota Green Step Cities program in five RCM communities. Green Step Cities is a new program; the Green Step Cities Demonstration Project will provide a platform for application. The following goals have been adopted: • Green Step Cities best practices. Green Step Cities is an action - oriented voluntary program offering a cost - effective, simple pathway leading to implementation of sustainable best 1 • of Edina practices that focus on greenhouse gas reduction. Green Step Cities include best practices in the areas of: buildings and facilities, land use, transportation, environmental management, and, community and economic development. Assessing and identifying opportunities. The Green Step Cities Demonstration Project will partner with five RCM cities to identify and implement Green Step Cities best practices. With support from the Green Step Cities Project Manager, the five demonstration cities will assess their current related practices and sustainability goals to identify areas of opportunities. In collaboration with the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE), best practices that are proven to have the greatest effect on reducing greenhouse gas emissions will be prioritized. • Communication and Learning. ULI MN /RCM encourages and expands peer -to -peer support and learning among Twin Cities regional mayors, and provides access to key expertise and technical resources. The Green Step Cities Demonstration Project will provide a base of knowledge, project review, and lessons learned through the implementation of Green Step Cities best practices. Outcomes and project examples will be documented, and findings will be made readily available on the ULI MN web site. Practices that have a proven ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and are readily replicable will be selected as priorities for promotion. GREENSTEP CITIES DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: The ULI MN /RCM Green Step Cities Demonstration Project seeks to address the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through advancing and implementing energy efficiency and sustainability best practices, and by motivating public officials to transition to a green economy. Goals include: • Educating leaders about Green Step Cities best practices, • Identifying actionable steps that are proven to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, • Promoting the implementation of these best practices, and • Communicating the results of these efforts through peer -to -peer advising. 2• of Edina The Green Step Cities Demonstration Project activities include: 1. Selection of five demonstration RCM Cities (September 2009); 2. Peer communication and learning (October 2009 —July 2010); 3. Review of selected cities' goals and policies that support the reduction of green house gas emissions (October- December 2009); 4. In partnership with each city, identify and prioritize Green Step Cities best practices (November 2009- February 2010); 5. Provide suggested action -steps and access to experts to assist cities in the implementation of desired best practices (January-April 2010); 6. Assessment of best practices planned for implementation and their potential to reduce greenhouse gas reductions (April -May 2010); 7. Share and communicate results (June -July 2010). RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES: The Energy and Environment Commission has recommended a total of 14 best practices for implementation (one may count twice). While this number exceeds the final recommendation of the GreenStep program (as staffed by ULI, MPCA, and the Smitten Group), the EEC felt that this combination of best practices satisfied their overall programmatic and work goals for the next several years. The following narratives describe each step, and lay out the background, timeline for implementation, and barriers to implementation for each best practice. The Energy and Environment Commission is recommending adoption of this set of best practices, and an endorsement by the City Council of continued involvement in the Green Steps Cities program through pursuit of a certificate as a Green Step City. At a future meeting, the EEC will present a document outlining the needed resources for each best practice, including personnel, budgetary and policy requirements. Staff will conduct a review of the best practices and identify projects and programs where capital dollars have been allocated, and where there is overlap between practice and planning for future projects and programs contained in this document. 3' of Edina Best Practice: #1 Efficient Existing Public Buildings Description: Work with utilities and others to assess and finance energy and sustainability improvements of existing public structures. Current Practice: The B3 database of city building data is complete and is currently being updated with the utility data. City buildings have not had full energy audits, nor have they been ranked for energy performance. The City has a five -year Capital Improvement Plan that can be utilized to fund building improvements internally. This may be augmented by grants or other revenue sources specific to projects. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: Substep #1: Enter yearly public building data into the Minnesota B3 database and rank buildings in regard to energy performance. The City will have utility data on its buildings over 5,000 square feet in the B3 Database by July 2010; other buildings can be added to the database as needed. Substep #2: Audit all buildings in the bottom third of energy performance ranking and implement all energy efficiency opportunities with a payback under 5 years. City buildings will need energy audits completed, either through a utility sponsored program or an independent third party. Substep #6: Internal Loan Fund — Complete Barriers to implementation: 1) Human and financial resources needed for conducting the initial audit and continuously monitoring energy consumption. 2) The financial resources to implement the energy efficiency opportunities identified by the audits. Step Effectiveness: Buildings make up 60% of carbon emissions by the City. Best Practice #1 is essential to curb carbon emissions in a meaningful way. However, implementation of the substeps, such as the Audit requirement, may incur substantial organizational and financial barriers. Staff will work with Xcel and Centerpoint Energy to determine cost of audits and establish a budget for the implementation of this step. Implementation schedule: This step can be implemented in phases over a two -year period, beginning in September, 2010, and ending in September 2013. 4• City of Edina Best Practice: #2 Efficient Existing Private Buildings Description: Increase Energy Efficiency in Private Buildings and Lighting Current Practice: Edina has a watering ordinance as well as a two tier conservation rate structure. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: #2 Working with a local utility, tailor a utility conservation improvement program (CIP) for your city. Bill /Michael #3 Promote residential energy efficiency programs in city mailings /newsletter — Paul, Bob & EO WG To implement sub step #2 and #3, a project team consisting of City staff (Heather Worthington) 3 EEC members (Paul, Mike, Bill), CEE, Xcel, and Centerpoint has been established. #5 Implement a robust watering ordinance and conservation rate structure — Heather - Complete Barriers to implementation: Finding sufficient volunteers, especially in Highlands. Step Effectiveness: Implementation schedule: Multi -phase plan that begins rolling out in May 2010: 1. Spring 2010 a. Focus on Saver Switch and Appliance Rebates (refrigerator recycling) and the Home Energy Squad program b. Door hanger project in Morningside. C. Use liquor stores and Warner - Stellian to promote refrigerator recycling Spring 2010 and ongoing -- Look for opportunities to promote city -wide: d. Cable TV/ PSA promotion e. Magnets and /or buttons f. City will create internet links to utility programs g. Third of July Parade: possibly distribute information & buttons /magnets 2. Fall 2010 (Beginning mid to late August, continuing through October /November) 5• of Edina a. A flyer in the city utility bill, developed by the city and approved by Centerpoint and Xcel, that emphasizes home audits, home energy squad, appliance rebate, and saving energy as the heating season approaches. b. Door hangers with the same themes will be distributed (Morningside, Highland, other neighborhoods ?) C. Develop and include 'testimonials' for neighborhood HES meetings d. Develop competition for energy savings — City council v. EEC v. Edina Go Green (EGG) Publicize quarterly to encourage community interest e. Highland neighborhood /school outreach program 3. Edina Day of Service — 10/9/2010 a. We could have a major focus on energy — home audits, HES. 4. Coordination with School District a. Fall 2010 -- Energy challenge between EHS schools? b. PSA energy announcements at football games? C. Coordinate with EHS on Edina Day of Service energy projects Best Practice: Comprehensive Plan Description: Adopt a Comprehensive Plan and tie regulatory ordinances to it. Current Practice: The 2008 Comp Plan Update includes mixed -use housing as a goal, and provides areas in the city to accommodate such uses. It also includes a full -scale report on bicycle and pedestrian access prepared by the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) in conjunction with the Transportation Commission. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: In 2008, the City Council adopted the final draft of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. In 2009, the Planning Commission began meeting twice a month to update the zoning ordinance, and address any inconsistencies between the city's ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan. Their work continues, and will likely be done this year. The Comprehensive Plan addresses land use, zoning, transportation, water resource, environmental, and housing issues. The Comprehensive Plan is updated every ten years, according to state 6• City of Edina statutory requirements. The Metropolitan Council oversees the formulation and implementation of each city's comp plan. Barriers to implementation: This plan represents very few barriers to implementation, apart from the more typical budgetary and community - related matters that arise to block or prevent implementation. Since it is a required document in state law, it is typically understood to be a guiding mechanism for planning activities. Implementation schedule: The City is currently in the implementation phase of the updated comp plan. This implementation will continue over the next ten years, and will be formally reviewed at the end of that period as part of the decennial update of the comp plan. Staff and elected officials will use this document as an overall guide for development, changes to transportation facilities, and other regional planning issues during that time. Changes to the document must follow a prescribed process which includes community input and approval by the City Council, followed by review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Step Effectiveness: This step is a required step. The statute prescribing the requirement for Comp Plans has been in place for about 40 years. No changes are recommended. Best Practice: #11 Complete Streets Description: Increase safety and mobility options for pedestrians, bicycles and all other vehicles, as well as creating more inviting public spaces and increased economic viability of businesses, while reducing maintenance costs, reducing storm water management, plus reducing emergency response times. Current Practice: Edina has a City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, which is not fully implemented. See http: / /www.ci.edina.mn.us /PDFs /CompPlan /Final /Microsoft %20Word %20 - %20Chapter% 207% 2OTransportation %2OBike %2ONovember %202008.pdf. Edina also has a sidewalk plan, but it is not fully implemented. See p. 23 of the Travel Forecasting section of the Comprehensive Plan at: http: / /www.ci.edina.mn.us /PDFs /CompPlan /Final /Microsoft%20Word %20- %20Chapter% 207% 2OTransportation% 2OTravel% 2OForecasting %2ONovember %202008.pdf Traffic calming measures such as sidewalks or bicycle routes have been implemented on a few streets, but the vast majority 7 • of Edina of streets do not have sidewalks or bicycle routes. The City of Edina does not have a Complete Streets plan .nvolving all streets, only the arterials. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: • #1 Complete Streets Policy —The Bicycle Transportation Plan and sidewalk plan need to be integrated into a Complete Streets plan for all streets with a schedule for the implementation of each segment. • #4 Identify and Remedy non - complete street segments by, for example, adding a bike lane of sidewalk. • #6 Traffic Calming measures on at least 1 street redevelopment project —This should be expanded beyond the proposed bicycle lanes for the current West 70th project. Each time a street is resurfaced, sidewalks and bicycle routes should be added as per the Bicycle Transportation Plan and sidewalk plan and reviewed by the Transportation Commission as well as the Bike Task Force. Barriers to implementation: Opposition to sidewalks due to: 1) Construction costs assessed to residents living in the designated travel -shed 2) Homeowner winter shoveling requirement for most sidewalks 3) Reduction of privacy 4) Hazard of pedestrians crossing the homeowner's driveway Opposition to bike routes due to: 1) Loss of parking in some cases for bicycle lanes 2) Hazard of cyclists crossing in street below homeowner's driveway. Step Effectiveness: The bar is too low in some cases. For example, traffic calming measures should be required for more than one street. Implementation schedule: Chair Latham informally spoke with the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) Chair and gave a PowerPoint program on the GreenStep Cities program to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) on May 20, 2010, with emphasis on the Complete Streets BP #11. The Transportation Commission (ETC) and BETF Chair informally expressed an interest in participating in BP #11 and await City Council approval for becoming a GreenStep City, after which the ETC and BETF could formally begin working with staff to make a determination as to which BP #11 sub steps to undertake, as well as develop a strategy for their implementation. 8• City of Edina Best Practice: #15 Purchasing Description: Adopt an environmentally preferable purchasing policy. Current Practice: The existing Purchasing Policy of the City of Edina does not recommend purchasing based on the selection of goods and services that have minimal impact on the environment. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: The Energy and Environment Commission of the City of Edina approved a newly drafted Environmental Purchasing Policy at its April 8, 2010 meeting. This Policy will be recommended to the Edina City Council for approval. The Environmental Purchasing Policy includes several of the substeps of this Best Practice: Substep #1: Purchase of Green Star Appliances and use of paper containing 30% post- consumer recycled paper. Substep #4: Purchase of Water Sense- certified products. Substep #7: Set standards for the purchase of used, remanufactured, and refurbished products. Substep #9: Adopt policies that decrease use of toxic and hazardous chemicals. Barriers to implementation: 1) Creation of a Purchasing Task Force: the policy recommends formation of a task force among city employees from various city departments. The Task Force must show commitment and leadership to effectively transform and, if necessary abandon, current purchasing practices. 2) Education and information sharing: city staff must keep up to date on the environmental effect of purchased products and effectively communicate this information among the various departments. Step Effectiveness: Best Practice #15 should be required. A city with an Environmental Purchasing Policy shows leadership and good management practices. Implementation schedule: 1) Approval of the Environmental Purchasing Policy by City Council — 4 months 2) Creation of Purchasing Task Force — 6 months 3) Creation of an implementation strategy by the Purchasing Task Force — 6 months to 1 year 9• of Edina 4) Implementation of purchasing recommendations —1 year or longer. It will be based on continuous ,mprovement best practices. Best Practice: #16 Urban Forest Description: Increase city tree and plant cover. Current Practice: The City of Edina has received the Tree City USA designation in the past, but let it lapse. It should not be difficult to get recertified as a Tree City USA. The City of Edina, has no tree preservation ordinance. The City of Edina has landscaping performance standards in 850.10, but they do not require any tree cover in parking lots. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: The Urban Forest Task Force (UFTF) recommended undertaking the following two sub steps: • #1 Qualify as a Tree City USA. City Forester Tom Horwath will draft the application for 2011. • Note: GreenStep #6 has been deleted and the Urban Forest Task Force needs to select another sub step. • #6 At least two practices must be chosen. The UFTF recommends the following: o Enact Ordinances to protect trees in the development process and to enhance the urban forest. The UFTF has drafted an Edina Tree Preservation Ordinance (ETPO) based on the unsuccessful ETPO ordinance proposed in Edina in 2002. o Adopt Landscaping performance standards that specify tree cover and other vegetation to be used in parking areas, maintenance yards and in other areas of mostly impervious surface. An amendment is proposed to 850.10 subdivision 1 (0) to require 25% parking lot canopy in 10 years. Barriers to implementation: The 2002 EPTO, on which the proposed amendments are based, was defeated. Concerns expressed by the Planning Commission and the City Council in 2002 included the increased involvement of the City Forester, who, as a part-time employee, could not comply with additional duties, as well as concern for making the entire city a tree preservation zone, which subjects residents to a tree removal permit requirement each time they wish to relandscape. The proposed ETPO does not involve City Forester time and applies only to public io • of Edina property or to private property where the level of development requires that the project come before the Planning Commission for approval. Step Effectiveness: Implementation schedule: 1) Achieve Tree City USA certification by 2011. 2) Ordinance revisions to be implemented in 2011. Best Practice: #17 Efficient Storm Water Management Description: Prevent storm water generation Current Practice: The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD) has jurisdiction over surface water quality in Edina with the exception of northeast Edina where the Minnehaha Watershed District (MWD) has jurisdiction. The policy of the district is to require that onsite retention and regional water quality treatment systems operate together to provide complete and effective runoff management through managing volumes, providing effective water quality treatment to remove sediment, pollutants & nutrients from storm water before discharging to surface water bodies and wetlands and to provide non - degradation of surface water bodies in the watershed. • City already meets 1" retention rate based on NMCWD requirements. • Encourages the use of better site design and low impact development as well as other techniques that minimize impervious surfaces or incorporates volume control purposes. • Storm water utility exists, fees are examined every 2 years. There are variable fees based on land use. Edina currently charges $18.13 per home per quarter for storm drainage. Property owners may petition for lower rates if they can prove reduction • Construction site operators must conform to NPDES Phase II, Watershed District and City ordinances pertaining to erosion & sediment controls and waste controls as stated within the May 2006 BMP Implementation Program of the City of Edina's Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: • #4 Create a storm water utility, which uses variable fees to incentivize storm water reduction and fund community storm water infrastructure and assistance. EEC will research the potential of creating an incentivized fee plan and will make a recommendation for future action. 11• of Edina • #5 Adopt and implement design standards or guidelines for renovations or new construction in the city addressing at least one of the following: o Rain gardens o Green roofs with or without cisterns & water /grey water reuse systems o Green alleys Green parking lots o The Water Working Group will research design and guideline standards for rain gardens, green roofs, green alleys and parking lots and will make recommendations to the ECC for potential ordinance development. • #6 Adopt, with modifications as needed, the model Storm water and Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance. Draft report has been prepared by Barr Engineering, currently under review. Barriers to implementation: • Potential resistance from citizens /commercial properties to higher usage fees (Step #4). Step Effectiveness: The creation and /or adoption of standards /ordinances that reduce the overall amount of imperious surfaces will lead to lessening the overall volume of drainage that enters the storm water system and diminishes the negative effects on wetlands and surface waters within the watershed area. Implementation schedule: • Comprehensive Water Management Plan Draft November 2009 is now under review and should be back to City Council for review in 6 to 8 months. • A full set of BMP (Best Management Practices) included in Table 1 of Storm Water Pollution Prevention May 2006 includes extensive timeline for storm run -off issues beginning September 2007. • EEC will continue to monitor progress and make additional recommendations. Best Practice: #18 Green Infrastructure Description: Use parks and trails to enhance the city's green infrastructure. Current Practice: The city of Edina has no policy on low maintenance native landscaping. The 1995 Edina Turf Management Plan was last updated in 2001. Well #14 is used to irrigate the City of Edina's Braemar Golf Course, which is also 12• of Edina certified as an Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary. Edina has community involvement in land restoration and stewardship in the form of community initiated buckthorn busts. When a group volunteers to remove buckthorn, the City Forester gives them a presentation on how to do it. The City provides the roundup and tools such as weed wrenches and hand saws. The City hauls the buckthorn to the city brush dump at Braemar Arena. From there the City of St Paul District Energy comes to chip it up and, for a low fee, haul it to St Paul to be burned for energy. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: The Urban Forest Task Force (UFTF) recommended undertaking the following three sub steps: #6 Park Management Standards of: a) Low Maintenance native landscaping — UFTF recommends Park Board institute the following policies: 1) 50% Minnesota native plantings for new plantings in city parks excluding Edinborough & Arneson Park 2) A policy similar to Minneapolis with a list of plants NOT recommended for planting in Edina Parks. This includes those on the Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture's noxious weed list, or which are invasive and destructive to native plant communities, as well as those which have chronic insect /disease pest problems that would result in higher maintenance costs and /or early mortality rates. b) Organic or Integrated Pest Management — A Task Force to update the Turf Management Plan (TMP) was established at the 4 -8 -10 EEC meeting. Germana Paterlini will represent EEC, Ellen Jones will represent Park Board and Vince Cockriel will represent city staff. The Community Health Commission will put it on its 5- 18-10 agenda requesting a volunteer commissioner to also participate. New organic practices and products have become available since 2001 and need to be evaluated and incorporated into the TMP. The TMP's List of noxious weeds also needs to be updated to comply with state statute, as well as provision made for woody invasive control with appropriate chemicals. C) Sources of Non potable water for irrigation — City well #14 was taken out of service in approximately 2006 due to elevated Radium 226 levels and was repurposed to irrigate Braemar Golf Course. #7 Certify Golf Courses for Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary — Complete for Braemar. In 2009 the EEC recommended to the Park Board that city parks be certified as Audubon Cooperative Sanctuaries as well. This is especially applicable to Bredesen Park, which is Edina's passive nature center. #9 Develop a program that involves community in land restoration and stewardship —A program exists but needs to be expanded. Maintenance after noxious weed removal must be funded and institutionalized. Barriers to implementation: Community land restoration is hampered by insufficient funding for removal and subsequent maintenance, lack of a full -time City Forester, and insufficient numbers of volunteers to deal with Edina's 600 acre parkland noxious weed infestation. 13• of Edina Step Effectiveness: Implementation schedule: Turf Management Plan update and the Low Maintenance Native Landscaping policy implementation in 2011. Best Practice: #19 Surface Water Quality Description: Improve local surface water quality Current Practice: The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD) has jurisdiction over surface water quality in Edina with the exception of northeast Edina where the Minnehaha Watershed District (MWD) has jurisdiction. MWD has had a project to improve water quality in Pamela Lake. Macro - invertebrate testing is being done by authority of the MWD at Minnehaha Creek in Utley Park in Edina, as well as 4 other sites along Minnehaha creek. Water is currently being tested in Edina by NMCWD at Cornelia, Mirror, Arrowhead and Indian Head Lakes and is also being tested by the Conservation League of Edina (CLE) at Lake Harvey, Pamela Lake, and Lake Edina. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: #3 Adopt measurable lake, stream and wetland health indicators or improvement targets, work with private and non - profit organizations to support citizen education efforts and involve stakeholders in actions to attain the targets, and annually report successes and failures. Targets may include measures such as trophic state, pollutant levels, health measures, water levels, and recreational carrying capacity. • Water Working Group of EEC will write petition to NMCWD to fund water testing on Arrowhead and Indian Lakes. Residents around these lakes have expressed interest in participating in improving water quality and getting the lake associations involved would likely be achievable. #4 Adopt a shore -land ordinance consistent with MN Dept of Natural Resources rules as modified. • Edina's setback requirements are consistent with the DNR's regulations and in a few locations are more restrictive than what the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources allow. • EEC will review and determine future recommendations for stricter standards. • EEC recommends a NEMO workshop for Fall 2010 140 of Edina Barriers to implementation: • Difficult to find volunteers for water quality testing. • Public opposition to ordinance revisions that protect water quality when their perception of aesthetics is compromised, or when convenience is compromised. • Limited city staffing. Step Effectiveness: For cities that are part of a watershed district, this step needs to be augmented with activities that cities -can undertake apart from, and /or jointly with watershed districts. For example: 1) Educate the public to the direct relationship /connection between surface water quality and storm water management. • Public outreach began in September 2007 and various steps scheduled through May 2011, BMP Implementation Program May 2006. 2) Create a pilot program at a local residential lake utilizing the CAMP methodology2) Educate, regulate activities degrading water quality using model ordinance language, performance standards, or bans, as appropriate, for at least one of the following: a) Coal -tar usage • City of Edina doesn't use coal tar. • EEC will recommend City to adopt a ban similar to White Bear Lake's ordinance to prevent private useage. • EEC will also work with other communities for a state -wide ban of coal tar. b) Mowing down to shorelines — vegetation buffers • City of Edina is working on an inventory on all public sites that will be completed in 2 years. Buffer is currently 20 -60' depending on lot size. • EEC Water Working Group will continue researching potential ordinance adoption for all shorelines. c) Chemicals such fluridone to control duckweed /gain a better understanding of inspection & maintenance schedules; private holding ponds vs. public, educating on benefits of duckweed vs. algae • EEC Water Working Group will research available less toxic materials to control algae and make recommendations for eliminating use of fluridone . 15 . of Edina d) Lawn chemicals • EEC Turf Management plan is reviewing and will make recommendations. Implementation schedule: • Petition for water testing will be submitted to NMCWD for implementation for Spring of 2011. • Education pieces beginning to discuss the effects of stormwater and impervious surface practices for commercial and residential uses, changing lawn practices, driveway maintenance, etc. are currently being generated through a number of different mediums and outlets: articles in Sun Current, City of Edina's website and NMCWD materials. • EEC will monitor outreach program and supplement with additional recommendations over the next few years. Best Practice: #22 Managing Solid Waste Description: Increase Waste Reduction, Reuse and Recycling Current Practice: The city of Edina has an organized hauling contract for residential recycling with payment made on the resident's utility bill. Residential solid waste and yard waste are removed via an open hauling system having six participating haulers where residents pay haulers directly. One residential solid waste hauler provides an organics collection option. City schools separate their organics. Recycling is not required for commercial businesses. There are no outdoor recycling bins in city parks. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: The Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group will be undertaking sub steps #1 and #6 as short term goals plus sub step #8 as a longterm goal. #1 Percentage reduction goals from city operations in at least 3 areas. The areas chosen are: 1) Parks — The objective is to place recycling bins in all parks 2) Junk mail reduction 3) Toxicity reduction of cleaning supplies. • #5 Arrange for a residential or institutional organics collection program - Complete with the school organics program and the Vierkant organics program 16• of Edina • #8 Organized Hauling— Invite MPCA's Peder Sandhei to give a PowerPoint presentation to a City Council Work Session on MPCA's "Analysis of Waste Collection Service Agreements" published in June 2010 with a goal of amending MN Stat 115A.94. Barriers to implementation: 1) Park Recycling Bins - Difficulties in raising funding for outdoor recycling bins costing from $415 - $665 /bin for forty parks given that the size of each park generally requires more than one bin. 2) Requiring Commercial Recycling — A sufficient education program must be undertaken to reduce push - back. Cooperation is needed from business organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce, Rotary, etc. City Ordinances need to be amended. 3) Organized Residential Solid Waste Hauling — MN Stat 115A.94 must be amended. Step Effectiveness: Best Practice #22 should be required. A city without a recycling program can hardly be considered environmentally responsible. Implementation schedule: 1) Park Recycling Bins — 2 Years 2) Requiring Commercial Recycling — 2 years 3) Organized Residential Solid Waste Hauling — 3 years Best Practice: #24 Benchmarks and Community Involvement Description: Adopt outcome measures for Green Steps and other sustainability efforts, engaging community members in ongoing education and discussion. Current Practice: The City of Edina has benchmarked its carbon emission footprint. As a member of ICLEI, the City of Edina completed Milestone 1 for the year 2007: inventory of carbon emissions generated by city operations, such as buildings, water pumps, city fleet, etc. Aggregate data were also collected for city -wide residential, commercial and industrial emissions. The Energy and Environment Commission has a very active Education and Outreach group that organizes several community events throughout the year. Commission members regularly publish articles on the local Sun Current newspaper and About Town, the official publication of the 1'7 • City of Edina pity of Edina. The results from the carbon emission inventory were used in a pilot project with the Carbon Disclosure Project and published on their website in 2009 (www.cd project. net). Best Practice as it applies to Edina: • Substep #1: The City of Edina reported the results of the carbon emission audit on its website, in an article in About Town, and in the pilot report with the Carbon Disclosure Project. • Substep #3: The City of Edina continuously engage members of the public through the various activities organized by the Education and Outreach Working Group of the Energy and Environment Commission. • Substep #4: The City of Edina organized a Natural Step workshop for City Staff and residents at large. • Substep #5: The Energy and Environment Commission works with energy utilities to organize energy audits for residents. Working with a task force of EEC members, representatives from Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy and the Center for Energy and the Environment (MN Energy Challenge Staff) we are focusing attention on two Edina neighborhoods this Summer and Fall of 2010 to promote the HES (Home Energy Squad) Program. The Morningside Neighborhood Association (MNA) will assist efforts to mobilize residents to attend HES educational meetings to enroll households in participating in the HES program in the Summer of 2010. In the Fall of 2010 we will begin working with the Highlands Neighborhood of Edina. This Summer we are building awareness about the HES program and connecting neighbors in the Highlands neighborhood through hosting the US Overall Flying disc Championships at their local park. Barriers to implementation: 1) Technology Infrastructure: the City must invest in technology tools if it wants to effectively monitor emission and implement carbon abatement strategies that are quantifiable and financially sound. 2) The main barrier to the success of the HES program is to find enough volunteers to canvas the Highlands neighborhood without an active neighborhood association. Step Effectiveness: Best Practice #23 should be required. Carbon benchmarking is the most important indicator of the effectiveness of the Green Step program in abating carbon emissions. Education: Encourage residents to take the MN Energy Challenge and to actively challenge neighborhoods to decrease their energy use and take advantage of the energy efficiency programs available to them. Implementation schedule: 1) Implementation of Technology Infrastructure —1 year 2) Completion of ICLEI Milestone 2 and 3 —1 to 2 years 3) Implementation of ICLEI Milestone 4: 2+ years 18• City of Edina 4) Education about the MN Energy Challenge and the Home Energy Squads- 1 -2 years Best Practice: #25 Green Business Development Description: Economic and Community Development Current Practice: The City has no current projects or programs in place. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: The Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group recommended undertaking the following two sub steps: • #2 Invite Assistance providers, such as Minnesota Waste Wise /Minnesota Energy Smart, the Minnesota Technical Assistance Program and utility assistance providers, to conduct personalized energy, environmental sustainability, and waste audits with at least 5 businesses. • MPCA is offering assistance to 10 businesses under GreenStep #22 Solid Waste in the form of providing sample contracts for hauling to assist commercial businesses to modify existing, or create new resource management contracts with waste haulers to manage recyclables, compostibles and hazardous materials. The RSW WG will work with local trade associations and give educational presentations on recycling as well as aiding them with an Easy Office Recycling program. • #4 Support the creation of a value -added business utilizing local waste - products such as wood from trees felled by storms, disease, insects and development. • St. Paul District Energy picks up and chips the wood from the Edina brush dump at Braemar and hauls it to St. Paul District Energy's plant at a cost to Edina far less than hauling the brush to a brush dump in Hastings, as was previously done. The chips are used to fuel St. Paul's District Energy's plant. Barriers to implementation: Identifying 10 commercial businesses who would like to start a commercial recycling program. Step Effectiveness: Implementation schedule: One year. 190 City of Edina Best Practice: #26 Renewable Energy Description: Adding local renewable energy generation capacity. Current Practice: The city of Edina currently has no renewable energy capacity. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: The Alternative Energy Working Group (AEWG) recommended sub step #2: #2 Install renewable capacity on at least one city -owned building, street light, speed display or chargeable message sign. Recommendation: Apply for a grant from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which is the $4.5 million Federal stimulus funding for renewable energy for local governments. This grant will require a 40% match. The grant would be used to install a 20 KW photovoltaic solar system on the public works building. We hope to satisfy a significant portion of the matching fund requirements by relying upon in -kind contributions of equipment and labor from the solar installer. The City will need to seek bids to install the system if it receives the grant. A Solar installer who is a member of the EEC Alternative Energy Working Group is willing to install a system at close to its cost. Approximately $16,000 in additional matching funds would be required. If the grant fund rules are issued as we anticipate, the city of Edina may be able to acquire a $200,000 solar panel system for approximately $16,000 in matching funds from the City. GreenStep Pilot Effectiveness PB #15 (Purchasing) Sub Step #2: "Purchase 15% renewable energy by 2015 consistent with the State's Next Generation Energy goal" is miscast under the BP for Purchasing and should be included under this Renewable Energy step instead. Under BP #15.2 the EEC makes the following recommendation. Invite Windsource to give their PowerPoint presentation to a work session of EEC /City Council so that a determination can be made as to what extent Windsource could be utilized to accomplish the 15% renewable energy objective. Barriers to implementation: 1) Solar Panel Project a) Funding issue: Although EEC's Alternative Energy Working Group (AE WG) member Greg Nelson's corporation, EH Systems, Inc., has generously agreed to supply in -kind matching services (site solar analysis, planning and installation) and products, at least $16,000 must be supplied via other resources. 20 • City of Edina , b) It is not yet known to what extent in -kind donations will receive credit under the Federal stimulus grant; consequently, matching funding requirements could be much higher than $16,000. c) There is no assurance Edina will be selected for the grant. 2) Windsource Project - There will be additional cost on the city energy bill for Windsource. Occasionally Windsource is cheaper than coal /gas depending on energy prices. Currently coal /gas are very low because the recession has decreased demand. Natural Gas is cheap presently because it has become more abundant. Implementation schedule: Solar panels — Applications are due July 26, 2010. A grant decision may be made after an additional 4 months. Installation will require a further 6 months. Utilizing Windsource would depend on the outcome of discussions with Xcel Windsource officials and pricing. 21• r AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of June 15, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 15, 2010 and Work Sessions of June 15, 2010 II. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. 15 DSR -E Squad Radar Packages— Edina Police Department * B. Insurance Renewals: 1. Workers Compensation 2. General Liability 3. Property * C. Shelving For New Public Works Facility III. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Ordinance No. 2010 -08 Amending Section 850 Adding Height Overlay District (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollca/l vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) B. Resolution No. 2010 -52 Directing Study of Rooftop Restaurants Agenda/Edina City Council July 6, 2010 Page 2 C. Ordinance No. 2010 -14 Establishing a Moratorium on Rooftop Restaurants In Edina (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) D. Ordinance No. 2010 -10 Amending City Code .Concerning Swimming Pools; Food Establishments and Food Vending Machines; and Hotels, Lodging and Boarding Houses (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) E. Presentation of League of Women Voters Study F. Resolution No. 2010 -56 Identifying Need For Livable Community Act Grant For Grandview District Report G. Resolution No. 2010 -53 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) H. Energy & Environment Commission Vacancy I. Set Hearing Date For Planning Items: 1. Final Development Plan, Final Plat & Final Rezoning — The Waters (7/20/2010) 2. Amendment To Final Development Plan- Cypress Equities (8/2/2010) * J. Resolution No. 2010 -54 Authorizing Use Of Central Count Ballot Counter For Primary and General Elections * K. Grant Acceptance & Approval of Agreement For Outdoor Hockey Rinks Project Hennepin County Youth Sports * L. Resolution No. 2010 -55 Appointing Interim City Manager * M. Resolution No. 2010 -57 Calling Public Hearing August 2, 2010, For Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement: No. S -106 and Normandale Road and Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement: No. S -104 IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment, " the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. V. FINANCE A. Receive Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Year Ended December 31, 2009 e Agenda/Edina-City Council July 6, 2010 Page 3 B. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Asper Pre -List dated June 15, 2010, TOTAL $740,562.66; and Pre -List dated June 23, 2010, TOTAL $2,748,833.68; and per Pre -List dated June 29, 2010, TOTAL $622,348.42 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence VII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS VIII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Jul 6 Work Session — New City Manager 4:00 P.M. Tues Jul 6 Work Session — Jnt Mtng with EEC 5:00 P.M. Tues Jul 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jul 20 Work Session - Budget 5:00 P.M. Tues Jul 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jul 27 Study Session — to be determined 7:00 A.M. Thurs Jul 29 Public Works Open House 4:00 — 6:00 P.M. Mon Aug 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Aug 3 Filing Opens — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy Tues Aug 10 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Tues Aug 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Aug 17 Filing Closes — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy Tues Aug 24 Study Session — to be determined 11:30 A.M. Mon Sep 6 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sep 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Sep 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Sep 28 Study Session — to be determined 7:00 A.M. Tues Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 26 Study Session — to be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CLERKS OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CLERKS OFFICE COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 15, 2010 7:04 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. Absent was Commissioner Bennett. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Housh for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 1. 2010, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 1, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Gordon H. Hughes, Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 15, 2010 7:09 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Member Bennett. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 1. 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF JUNE 1, 2010 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving the minutes of the regular meeting of June 1, 2010, and work session of June 1, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — INSURANCE RENEWALS: 1. WORKERS COMPENSATION: 2. GENERAL LIABILITY: AND, 3. PROPERTY — CONTINUED TO JULY 6. 2010 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh continuing award of bid for insurance renewals: 1. workers compensation; 2. general liability; and, 3. property to the July 6, 2010, Council meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — SELF - CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS — EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for 43 self - contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), Fire Department, to the recommended low bidder, Clarey's Safety Equipment, Inc. at $200,563.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — 2010 -2011 ICE CONTROL PURCHASE Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for cooperative salt purchase for the 2010 -2011 season to the recommended low bidder, Cargill, Inc., regular salt at $57.59 per ton delivered and treated salt at $73.79 per ton delivered. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT ENG 10 -10 — OAK LAWN AVENUE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for Oaklawn Avenue storm sewer improvements to the recommended low bidder, Minnesota Dirtworks, Inc. at $91,911.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — SHELVING — NEW PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for shelves for new Public Works facility to the recommended low bidder, Mid America Business Systems at $63,799.86. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -13 ADOPTED — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES Manager Hughes indicated the Council had granted first reading at its June 1, 2010, meeting to amend Section 900 of the code to permit the issuance of an intoxicating liquor license to bowling centers. He noted the revision made by the Council at First Reading clarifying that outdoor games were prohibited. Mr. Hughes advised the Page 1 r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 15, 2010 7:09 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Member Bennett. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 1, 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF JUNE 1, 2010.Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving the minutes of the regular meeting of June 1, 2010, and work session of June 1, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — INSURANCE RENEWALS: 1. WORKERS COMPENSATION; 2. GENERAL LIABILITY; AND, 3. PROPERTY — CONTINUED TO JULY 6, 2010 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh continuing award of bid for insurance renewals: 1. workers compensation; 2. general liability; and, 3. property to the .July 6, 2010, Council meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — SELF - CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS — EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for 43 self - contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), Fire Department, to the recommended low bidder, Clarey's Safety Equipment, Inc. at $200,563.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — 2010 -2011 ICE CONTROL PURCHASE Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for cooperative salt purchase for the 2010 -2011 season to the recommended low bidder, Cargill, Inc., regular salt at $57.59 per ton delivered and treated salt at $73.79 per ton delivered. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT ENG 10 -10 — OAK LAWN AVENUE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for Oaklawn Avenue storm sewer improvements to the recommended low bidder, Minnesota Dirtworks, Inc. at $91,911.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *AWARD OF BID — SHELVING — NEW PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for shelves for new Public Works facility to the recommended low bidder, Mid America Business Systems at $63,799.86. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -13 ADOPTED — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES Manager Hughes indicated the Council had granted first reading at its June 1, 2010, meeting to amend Section 900 of the code to permit the issuance of an intoxicating liquor license to bowling centers. He noted the revision made by the Council at First Reading calcifying that outdoor games were prohibited. Mr. Hughes advised the Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 15, 2010 It Planning Commission would consider the request to amend past zoning approvals relative to amplification at outdoor restaurants and that matter would be considered by the Council at its July 20, 2010, meeting. The Council referenced correspondence received regarding outdoor wood burning fireplaces. Mr. Hughes indicated that a wood - burning fireplace was not prohibited by fire and building codes, but it had to meet design standards. If the Council supported further restriction, it would result in a broader application and require an ordinance revision. The Council also reviewed correspondence submitted by Arnie Bigbee regarding his visit to a Pinstripes establishment in Chicago, pictures of a sliding glass wall, and indication there had been no emanation of bowling noise to the bar and dining room areas. Following consultation with Attorney Knutson, Council consensus was reached to clarify the wording of section 1, subparagraph C, to indicate: "Bowling lanes and bocce courts and lanes shall be located indoors , All exterior windows..." Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -13, amending Edina City Code concerning liquor, as revised. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -48 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -48 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -49 ADOPTED — APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -49, appointing Primary Election Judges for the August 10, 2010, Primary. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -50 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING HISTORICAL SOCIETY GRANT ON BEHALF OF THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -50, authorizing acceptance of certified local government grant Minnesota Historical Society on behalf of the Heritage Preservation Board. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY REVIEW OF JUNE 2, 2010, APPROVED Engineer /Public Works Director Houle presented the June 2, 2010, Traffic Safety Review and described its consideration of the resident request for stop signs at Brookview Avenue and West 55th Street. He reviewed the set of criteria used to consider the placement of residential stop signs and provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Mr. Houle explained since there was a lack of warrants for a residential stop sign, staff recommended denial of the request for stop signs at Brookview Avenue and West 55th Street. However, staff agreed with the need to define traffic "right -of -way" at this intersection, so suggested the installation of a "yield" sign on West 55th Street for both east and west bound traffic at Brookview Avenue. Mayor Hovland invited residents to address the Council regarding this matter. Page 2 •• Minutes /Edina City Council /June 15, 2010 Alyssa Pankratz, 5429 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council and submitted a petition. Anne Tressler, 5533 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Sheryl Bare, 5508 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. The Council acknowledged this was a beautiful compact residential neighborhood without sidewalks to provide separation of pedestrians from the roadway. The Council noted that the installation of sidewalks would improve pedestrian safety. The Council indicated their belief that the requested stop signs would not provide a measure of safety sought by residents, and so they encouraged residents to file a petition requesting sidewalk installation. The Council and Traffic Safety Coordinator Tate discussed past requests for residential stop signs and warrants required to justify installation. The warrants were not met, and the requesting neighborhood does not experience cut - through traffic, so drivers were neighborhood residents. Mr. Houle stated that the neighborhood streets were scheduled for reconstruction in 2011. He add an open house and informational meetings were scheduled to be held in August and September. Mr. Houle suggested that residents request sidewalk and /or traffic calming measures that could be addressed as part of the planned neighborhood street reconstruction project. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving Traffic Safety Review of June 2, 2010. Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -51 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING GRANT ON BEHALF OF EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -51, Edina Fire Department assistance to firefighters grant. Motion carried on rolicall vote — four ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT Julie Mellum, 5700 York Avenue S., expressed support for regulating emission of wood smoke. Lynn Johnson, 6533 Ridgeview Drive, expressed support for regulating emission of wood smoke. Vivian Baumann, 6913 Xerxes Avenue S., Richfield, expressed concern with potential Richfield traffic impacts from the proposed CVS Pharmacy. Christine Henninger, 5816 Jeff Place, asked the Council to assure a public input process prior to revising the City's Comprehensive Plan. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 3, 2010, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $69,203.90; Communications Fund $112.20; Police Special Revenue $1,098.00; City Hall Debt Service $2,000.00; Working Capital Fund $119,599.25; Equipment Replacement Fund $2,915.30; Art Center Fund $23,353.25; Golf Dome Fund $1,088.96; Aquatic Center Fund $5,827.38; Golf Course Fund $36,170.08; Ice Arena Fund $607,841.13; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $12,374.77; Liquor Fund $181,781.52; Utility Fund $174,177.26; Storm Sewer Fund $34,472.55; Recycling Fund $15.00; PSTF Agency Fund $4,655.69; TOTAL $1,276,686.24 and for approval of payment of claims dated June 10, 2010, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $87,736.64; Communications Fund $2,735.02; Working Capital Fund $2,950.74; Equipment Replacement Fund $2,997.84; Art Center Fund $3,925.07; Golf Dome Fund $1,228.58; Aquatic Center Fund $54,093.50; Golf Course Fund $22,183.97; Ice Arena Fund $18,329.04; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $21,460.04; Liquor Fund $209,425.49; Utility Fund $421,899.35; Storm Sewer Fund $373.83; Recycling Fund $3,826.13; PSTF Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 15, 2010 Agency Fund $7,599.66; TOTAL $860,764.90; and Credit Card Transactions dated April 27, 2010 — May 25, 2010; TOTAL $7,107.35. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 6, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 15, 2010, meeting available. Page 4 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 15, 2010 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Member Bennett. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Cary Teague, Director of Planning; John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Director of Public Works; Sherry Engelmann, City Sanitarian; Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief; Dave Nelson, Deputy Police Chief; Bob Wilson, City Assessor; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to review the City's 2010 Operating Budget and begin planning the City's 2011 Operating Budget. Manager Hughes explained the work session would review the budget forecasting model used in past years, the City's current year finances would be reviewed through April 30, 2010, and the Enterprise Budgets' process would be discussed. He noted the meeting would be the first of the budget process that would culminate in adoption of the 2011 Operating Budget in December. Mr. Hughes noted the levy adopted in September would be the maximum levy allowed which could be reduced by Council action, but could not be increased after September. The Quarterly Financial Update, April 2010 Special Edition was reviewed relative to the revenues received and expenditures to date. Staff explained that the largest revenue item, the City's tax revenues would not be received until sometime in June. After that settlement has been received, the 2010 revenue year will have a better estimate available. The expenditures were very similar to 2009 at the same time. Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed three potential budget scenarios. The first scenario would continue to operate as per the 2010 model. The second scenario added back some of the budget items cut in 2009 and 2010. The third scenario added back more items and included some new requests. Mr. Hughes explained the City was in the final year of legislatively imposed levy limits. He added that the League of Minnesota Cities had estimated the amount of the allowable increase would be 1.68% plus the City's share of the PERA increase as required by statute. It was noted that there were certain special levies outside of the limits. Staff noted that Center Point and Xcel had been informed the City may be considering the establishment of franchise fees in accordance with the requirements of their franchise ordinances. Council and staff briefly discussed potential uses of franchise fees. Mr. Hughes explained enterprise business plans were developed and reviewed bi- annually with the Council. He added that annual budgets were developed for each enterprise although those budgets were not submitted with the General Fund Budget. Discussion ensued about possible changes to the development of Business Plans and budgets for enterprises. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland announced that the Budget Work Session was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. It was noted that the Mayor and Council would receive a conference call from Harry Brull, consultant concerning the City Manager hiring process. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 6, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 15, 2010 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Member Bennett. Staff present: Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager. In a phone conference with Harry Brull of PDI, the Council was informed there were 29 candidates. Mr. Brull stated he felt after viewing the candidate pool, there was a strong field. He noted the following: • 16 candidates were from the Twin Cities metropolitan area • Other states represented included: FL,TX,IL,WI,LA,NM • The largest single group, although not a majority, were sitting city administrators and managers. Mr. Brull outlined the following timeline that will be followed: • June 17 — requests for additional information sent to continuing candidates • June 25 — Supplemental information received from candidates • June 28 —All candidate information forwarded to Council • July 6 — Council decision regarding semi- finalists(6) invited for interviews • July 12 — Semi - finalist interviews with citizens, staff and department heads • July 16 — Information from interviews forwarded to Council • July 20 — Council decision regarding continuing candidates (3 -4) • July 22 — Interview by senior city manager panel • July 26 — Additional information forwarded to Council After the information has been forwarded to the Council in late July, a decision will be made about whG which and how many candidates go forward. Mr. Brull indicated PDI was prepared to conduct its due diligence process that would require approximately two weeks. At that point PDI would forward all information to the Council in preparation for their final interviews. Mr. Brull suggested those final interviews could occur the week of August 16, 2010, or possibly the previous week. At this point, the call was concluded, and the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 6, 2010. Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manger James B. Hovland, Mayor o e U REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER \\ less To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item zz I. A. From: Nate Mendel Administration Sgt. Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Request to Purchase 15 Radar Units Item Description: 15 DSR -E Squad Radar Packages DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE 61212010 813112010 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Stalker Radar Applied Concepts Inc. 1.$37,032.19 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Stalker Radar Applied Concepts (State Contract #442840) $37,032.19 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacing 15 Radar Units Per Equipment Replacement Schedule 1 Si ture Depart ent, �) a The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within budgoi �pq Wale inance Director Gordon 14ugh64 City Manager 4� Le V, �y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II. B. 1. From: Ceil Smith Assistant to City Manager Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Insurance Renewals Item Description: Worker's Compensation Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: NA Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Traveler's 1.$470,143 2. 2. - - 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Traveler's $470,143 GENERAL INFORMATION: Attached is a comparison of the Worker's Compensation coverage. Staff is recommending the Traveler's quote of $470,143, which is less than a 1 % increase. There is but one quote, because the market is very limited for this type of coverage. Mr. Bill Homeyer will be present at our meeting should you have any questions. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within bu Gordon HdghekVity Manager rector Travelers League of Cities (Quote) City of Edina Worker's Compensation Premiums 2010 $470,143 2009 $446,915 11: $426,905 $513,653 %-A O H REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II. B. 2. From: Ceil Smith Assistant to City Manager Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Insurance Renewals Item Description: General Liability v Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: NA Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Traveler's 1.$338,096 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Traveler's $338,096 GENERAL INFORMATION: - Attached you will find a premium comparison for the various liability coverages that are contained in the City's liability insurance package. Included in that comparison are the quotes for 2010 -11. The decrease for the coming year is less than 1 %, and staff recommends that the City accept the quote of $338,096. Traveler's is the only quote that is presented because of the limited market for this type of coverage. Mr. Bill Homeyer will be present if you should have questions. Signature � De me The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budge! n VallinAnAnce Director Gordon Hugf(es, (Vity Manager City of Edina Premium Comparison Equipment Values of $2,543,583 in 2010 Values of $2,613,174 in 2007 Values of $2,575,200 in 2008 Values of $2,543,583 in 2009 General Liability & Liquor Employee Benefit Liability 2010 2007 $9,538 $12,069 2008 2009 $10,067 10,514 $122,367 $160,775 $122,078 119,496 $343 $343 $343 343 Law Enforcement Liability $80,154 Employment Practices Liability $22,832 Public Entity Management Liability $7,234 Auto Liability $84,289 188, 174, 175, 188 units 28, 27, 32, 29 Trailers, Auto Physical Damage $11,339 $86,688 $76,159 82,718 $26,412 $22,443 22,854 $7,346 $6,730 6,218 $87,467 $87,319 88,203 $12,045 $11,801 7,759 TOTAL $338,096 $393,145 $336,940 338,105 Otte REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II. B. 3. From: Ceil Smith Assistant to City Manager Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Insurance Renewals Item Description: Property Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: NA Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Traveler's 1.$51,259 2. Affiliated FM 2.$76,000 3. AXIS 3.$73,600 4. Chubb 4.$54,543 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Traveler's $51,259 GENERAL INFORMATION: Attached is the pricing for renewal of the City's property insurance. Please notice the rate is going down, notwithstanding the increase in the value of the City's total insured property, because of the addition of the new Public Works building. Staff recommends the Traveler's quote of $51,259. Mr. Jack Carroll will be present should you have questions. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not withii v ANA• �(v e t4 III. Pricing Renewal Property Proposal July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2011 Rating Basis (Property): U,.xpirin,_, 2009 $108,722,324 2010 Wnewal $123,222,325 20 10 OptioLi $123,222,325 20 11) Option $123,222,325 21) 10 Option $123,222,325 Rate (Property): .0698/$100 .0415987/$100 .0616771/$100 .0597294/$100 .0442638/$100 Estimated Annual Property Premium: $75,966 $51,259 $76,000 $73,600 $54,543 Boiler & Machinery Premium: Included Included Included Included Included Marine Premium: Included Included Included Included Included Crime Premium: Included Included Included Included Included Total Estimated Package Premium $75,966 $51,259 $76,000 $73,600 $54,543 Payment Plan with Travelers — 25% down, 9 equal payments — no interest g:\c\cityedin\2010\mktg- t &d\10 property proposal.doc� Presentation Date: 6/15/ 10 • REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II.C. From: Wayne D. Houle Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Shelving for new Public Works Facility Item Description: Shelves for new Public Works Facility — Non State Contract Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: June 25, 2010 July 25, 2010 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Mid America Business Systems 1. $76,299.82 2. Minnesota Supply Company 2. $82,600.58 RECOMMENDED QUOTE:OR BID: Mid America Business Systems $76,299.82 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is the second half of the shelving in the mezzanines and shops for the new Public Works facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The shelving will be placed in the following areas: Equipment Operations, Parks, Electrical, Utility, Street, Concrete, Sign -shop, and PW Archive Room. The first phase of the shelving was through the State of Minnesota Purchasing Program. Funding for these purchases will be from the respective equipment replacement budgets. Staff recommends awarding this project to Mid America Business Systems. . MAO Signature The Recommended Bid is V udget Public Works Department not within budget ohn Wallin, Finance Director Gordon Hughes, Cit anager G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Public Buildings\PW - 7450 Metro Boulevard\Non- Contractual Agreements\Shelving \Item II C Shelving For New Public Works Facility.Docx -4 R \1880 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III.A. : Cary Teague Action Planning Director r F Discussion D Information : July 6, 2010 Subject: Ord. No. 2010 -08 Amending Section 850 adding a Height Overlay District ACTION REQUESTED: First reading of an Ordinance amendment to establish a building height overlay district to regulate building heights in the City's commercial, industrial and high density residential zoning districts. The purpose of the Ordinance is to bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, which establishes maximum building heights within certain areas of the City. The Ordinance before the City Council is the result of the work session held with the Planning Commission, which concluded in the following changes: A revision of the Building Height Overlay District Map in three areas: 1) the area north of 66th Street, west of Xerxes was revised from a 4 -story maximum to a 12- story maximum. 2) The area west of France Avenue, south of 76th Street and east of Parklawn was revised from a 4 -story maximum to a 12 -story maximum. 3) The Gramercy site, on 70th Street, west of Highway 100 was revised from an 8- story maximum to a 4 -story maximum. • The issue of podium height will be further addressed by the Planning Commission during its work on the overall Zoning Ordinance amendment. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Planning Commission Recommendation: On March 24, 2010, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the attached Ordinance Amendment. ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance 2010 -08. • Planning Commission Staff Reports — February 24, March 10 and March 24, 2010. • Planning Commission Minutes — February 24, March 10 and March 24, 2010. • State Statute regarding uniform zoning regulations. (For reference.) r , ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD A BUILDING HEIGHT OVERLAY DISTRICT V The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Section 850.13, Subd: 5.C. (PRD & PSR, Planned Residence Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 5. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. C. Maximum Building Height. PRD -3 3 cteries eF An feet' whinhever is less See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Append A of the Citv's Official Zoning Mar).F- PRD-4, 5 Ale mwimum; height is determined by Fern lired E tbaGks. See Section 850.22, Building Height. Ove ylar District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map.- PSR -3 3 st^ries or 40 feet, whinhever is less. ;See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Append A of the City's Official Zoning Map. PSR-4 Ne4naximt s �m• height is determined bV Fe911ireil set�ks.'-,Se ection 850.22, Building Height Overlay strict and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Mapj. Section 2. Section 850.14, Subd. 6.13 (MDD, Mixed Development Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. C. Setbacks. Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract or from public street right- -of -way. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard MDD -3 35' 35' 20' 35' MDD -4 35' 35' 20' 35' 0 y F1 1 MDD -5 35' r 135' 1,201 35' MDD -6 35' 35' 20',.. 1. 35 The minimum building setback shall be increased by Y2 foot for each foot the building height exceeds the`minimum required setback, provided, however, the required interior side yard setback, shall not be less than 35 feet if the boundary of the tract adjoins land zoned and used for residential purposes. D. Maximum Building Height. MDD -3 eateries er Ail feet whieheVer is less See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appenn A of the City's Official Zoning Map. MDD -4 4 st.6ries er 60 feet WhieheV& is less See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix �A of the City's Official Zoning Map. MDD -5 NO mwim11m; height is rle+erminerl by r6014ei-I ce+ ,Se Se Pee 850.22, Building Height �� iOve ylar District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zonin g Map �— MDD -6 No maximum;. height is .determined by regl Iirer) a tbaGks. Se Se ection 850.22, Building Height iOver rlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Mapg Buildings abutting a city park shall not exceed twos stories. Building height shall be increased if the heigh �of the building is equal to the setback from the park. Section 3. Section 850.15, Subd. 5.D (POD, Planned Office Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6. Requirements for.: Building Coverage, Setbacks,. and Height. D Maximum Building Height. POD -1 4 stories or 60 feet Whiehever is less See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map. POD-2 NO m.wimUm•- height As determined, by regi IireiJ se bay ;See Section 850.22, Building Heig 2 I 1 Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map Section 4. Section 850.16, Subd. 11.0 (PCD, Planned Commercial Districts) is hereby amended' as follows: Subd.11. Requirements for- Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. C. Maximum Building Height. PCD -1 Two stepoer., See Section 850.22, Building Heigh Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map, PCD -2 tee, �r Sinrip-8 OF 50 fee+ whinheyer is less. See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and AppenclN �A of the City's Official Zoning Map. PCD -3 Maximum height is determined- by PaFagO ph G and See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of ti 'City's Official Zoning Map PCD -4 8ee Section 850.22, Building Height i'N lace y District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map Section 5. Section 850.1.6, Subd..12.D (PCD, Planned Commercial Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 12. Special Requirements. A. Established Average Front Street Setback for_PCD -1 and PCD -2. When more than 25 percent of the frontage on one side of the street between intersections is occupied.:by buildings having,front.street setbacks of greater or lesser distances than hereafter required;. then the average setback of the existing buildings shall be maintained by all new-or relocated. buildings on the same side of that street and between the intersections. If a building is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback, and there,are existing buildings on only one side of the building or relocated building, the.front'street setback of the new or relocated building need be no greater than that of the nearest adjoining,principal building. If a building is to be built or relocated where there -is an established average setback and..there. are existing buildings on both sides of the new or relocated building, the front street 'setback need ,be no greater than that which would be established by connecting a 3 line "'°Fuel with the fFeRt line r.ORRentinry be ee the most forward portion of the adjacent principal building on each side. B. Interior Side Yard and Rear Yard Setbacks. Interior side .yard and rear yard setbacks' including parking setbacks and.loading facility setbacks apply only when the side or rear lot line is '.a Planned .Commercial District boundary. C. Setbacks for PCD -3. The minimum building setback required by Paragraph B of Subd. 11 of this subsection shall be increased ,as follows: 1. In -the area bounded by France Avenue on the west, York Avenue on the east and West 70th Street on the. south,, the minimum building setback shall be increased by 1/3 footfor each foot that the building exceeds 50 feet in building. height. For purposes hereof, only those portions of buildings which exceeds 50 feet in building height need provide the additional setbacks required by this paragraph. 2. In all other areas, the minimum building setback shall be equal to the building height for buildings taller than 50 feet. Notwithstanding the requirement of this subsection, the City encourages i) ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment and ii) pedestrian connections by way of skyways and tunnels and, therefore, the City Council will consider, exceptions to setback requirements for these purposes. 3. (r, ell n.;c ec. the Friaximurn shall he equal to the req Direr) c etbarsks Section 6. Section 850.17, Subd. 3.G (PID, Planned Industrial District) is. hereby amended as follows: Subd. 3 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks; and Height. 4 i , G. Maximum Building Height. Fe ur steries er 50 fee+ Whinhever ic. � See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendi Al of the City's Official Zoning Map Section 7. Section 850.18, Subd. 3.0 (RMD,.Regional Medical.District)'is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 3 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. C. Maximum Building Height. Ne rn wimp height rle+errr inor) by ron- e4%tb Qks ee Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay !District and Appendix A of the Citv's Official Zoning Map j— Section 8. Section 850 is hereby-amended to add the follows: 850.22. Building Height Overlay District (HOD) Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish maximum building height regulations in order to minimize visual impact from tall buildings built within established neighborhoods in and around commercia and industrial neiahborhoods.l ubd. 2. Boundaries. The official boundaries for each Height Overlay istrict are established on Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map ubd. 3. Maximum Building Heights. The following maximum building sights are required within each of the following Height Overlay Districts HOL D- Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, bu Pall not exceed 1 story or 20 feet, whichever is less_, HOB D-2 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, bu i , hall not exceed 2 stories or 24 feet, whichever is less; HOD -3 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but hall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less D -4 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, bu shall not exceed 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is less D -8 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, bu shall not exceed 8 stories or 96 feet, whichever is less r I:I OD -9 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 9 stories or 108 feet, whichever is less .F OD -10 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 feet, whichever is less .'I OD -12 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 feet, whichever is less (J ; 6 WILSON RD & EDEN AVE DETAIL %v p T CITY HLT ;`Ij HALL Eol� o 2 GRANDVIEW DETAIL CAHILL RD & 70TH DETAIL PC Draft ti Building Height Overlay Districts MORNINIkSIDE ��e ) City of Edina 4 4'��° Hennepin County, Minnesota Appendix A 5 _ W 70TH S A_sE �R >�'�, i 44TH & FRANCE DETAIL 50TH & FRANCE DETAIL fl� cwt ST N FULLER Legend HOD -2 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 2 stories or 24 feet, whichever is less. ® HOD -3 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less HOD -4 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, ! _J but shall not exceed 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is less HOD -8 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 8 stories or 96 feet, whichever is less. Ci HOD Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 9 stories or 108 feet, whichever is less. HOD- 10 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 feet, whichever is less. ® HOD -12 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 feet, whichever is less. I Church >m City Buildings N W +E Private School S Planning Depl j Public School „n, 2010 VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DETAIL Q Q Q Q O Z _w O Q > -j Y Y O Q O � O m �W 62ND S Rp , ty9SN�11� A. ow e v� � �y .. �'�srnu'�• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague March 24; 2010 2009.0004.10b Director of Planning Information & Background Attached is an Ordinance amendment that would bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan. (See pages Al —A6.) The Ordinance would establish a Building Height Overlay District over the City's entire commercial, industrial and high density residential zoning districts, and would establish height regulations as prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. (See the approved Comprehensive Plan on pages A7 —A9.) The map on page A10 highlights the areas where a height change is required by the Comprehensive Plan. Note that all of the changes reduce the existing height maximums. The overlay district is proposed because cities cannot require different height standards within the same zoning district. The Comprehensive Plan requires different heights within the -same zoning districts. At the request of the Planning Commission at last months meeting, the maps have been revised to increase the height on the sites designated as HOD -1 to match the height standards of adjacent property. The effect of this change is that it would allow building heights in the PCD- 4.district from 2-4 stories. The heights would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. These would be the only areas where. allowed heights would be increased from the city's existing height standards. The only uses that are allowed within this zoning district are automobile service centers, car washes and gas stations. Also, the key has been amended so that the number associated with the district matches the number of stories allowed. This change would make it easier to interpret the ordinance and map for staff, developers and residents. � 1 Recommendation /Conclusion Staff recommends approval of the attached.ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. 0 DRAFT — DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 2010— AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD A BUILDING HEIGHT OVERLAY DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Section 850.13,'Subd. 5.C. (PRD & PSR, Planned Residence Districts) is hereby amended as follows: subd.:5..Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. G. Maximum Building Height. PRD -3 3 stormes or 49 feet, WhiGheV8F 08 less. See SectiorL 50.22, Building Height Overlay District and App. ndi q of the City's Official Zoning Map PRD -4, 5 Ale maxi mU.v,; heirrh� 0eterm;ned h., req y;re�d 64 tbaGks.;Se Se ection 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official ZoningMapf PSR -3 Z stcnrnr�;e cd�er 40 fee+ r whn ; nheyer s ee Section!, 50.22, Building Height Overlay District and Append A of the City's Official Zoning Ma . PSR-4 No maximumi hei0h+ ;c. ,determined by rani Iireid setback SeSection 850.22, Building Heighfi 'Overlay rlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning MpL Section 2. Section 850.14, Subd. 6.13 (MDD, Mixed Development Districts) is hereby amended as ;follows: Subd. 6. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks;. and Height. C. Setbacks. Setbacks. shall be measured from the boundary of the tract or from public street right -of -way. f�� Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard MDD -3 35' 35' 20' 35' f�� The minimum building .setback shall be, increased by Y2 footfor. each foot the building. height exceeds,tke minim" urn required setback, provided, however, the required interior side yard setback shall not be less than 35 feet if the boundary of the tract adjoins:land zoned and used for residential purposes. D. Maximum Building Height. .MDD -3 .3 6+8Fier+ OF 40 fee +,wee; is ee Section ,850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix of the City's Official Zoning Map. MDD-4 . ;See Section 1850.22, Building Height Overlay District and App endix A of the City's Official Zoning Map MDD -5 No maximumi height is deteFFn'ne!0-§tTq._. setbashs- See Section 850.22, Building Heig th bverlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map F - MDD -6 No rvmaxi mum• height de +e4mined by reg ireri & tbaGkS.'See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official oning Map.l Buildings abutting a city park shall not exceed two I tories. Building height shall be increased if the height of the building is equal to the setback from the park Section 3. Section. 850.15, 'Subd. 5.13 (POD, Planned Office Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. D. Maximum Building Height. POD -1 See Sectio 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendi A of the City's Official Zoning Map j POD -2 Ale m+vimi gym• height ie ile+ermined by ren i�eri setbashs See Section 850.22, Building Heig th 2 MDD-4 35' 35' 20' 35' MDD -5 35' 35' 20' 35' MDD -6 35' 35' 20' 35' The minimum building .setback shall be, increased by Y2 footfor. each foot the building. height exceeds,tke minim" urn required setback, provided, however, the required interior side yard setback shall not be less than 35 feet if the boundary of the tract adjoins:land zoned and used for residential purposes. D. Maximum Building Height. .MDD -3 .3 6+8Fier+ OF 40 fee +,wee; is ee Section ,850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix of the City's Official Zoning Map. MDD-4 . ;See Section 1850.22, Building Height Overlay District and App endix A of the City's Official Zoning Map MDD -5 No maximumi height is deteFFn'ne!0-§tTq._. setbashs- See Section 850.22, Building Heig th bverlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map F - MDD -6 No rvmaxi mum• height de +e4mined by reg ireri & tbaGkS.'See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official oning Map.l Buildings abutting a city park shall not exceed two I tories. Building height shall be increased if the height of the building is equal to the setback from the park Section 3. Section. 850.15, 'Subd. 5.13 (POD, Planned Office Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. D. Maximum Building Height. POD -1 See Sectio 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendi A of the City's Official Zoning Map j POD -2 Ale m+vimi gym• height ie ile+ermined by ren i�eri setbashs See Section 850.22, Building Heig th 2 Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map. Section 4. Section 850.16, Subd. 11.0 (PCD, Planned Commercial Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 11. Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. C. Maximum Building Height. PCD -1 Two stories See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map_ PCD -2 . See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map, PCD -3 of Subd. 12 of this . 'See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map. PCD -4 One story. See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map.. Section 5. Section 850.16, Subd. 12.D (PCD, Planned Commercial Districts) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 12. Special Requirements. A. Established Average Front Street Setback for PCD -1 and PCD -2. When more than 25 percent of the frontage on one side of the street between intersections is occupied by buildings having front street setbacks of greater or lesser distances than hereafter required, then the average setback of the existing buildings shall be maintained by all new or relocated buildings on the same side of that street and between the intersections. If a building is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback, and there are existing buildings on only one side of the building or relocated building, the front street setback of the new or relocated building need be no greater than that of the nearest adjoining principal building. If a building is to be built or relocated where there is an established average setback and there are existing buildings on both sides of the new or relocated building, the front street setback need be no greater than that which would be established by connecting a A3 . 3 line paFaliel with the fFent line GanneGfing between the most forward portion of the adjacent principal building on each side. B. Interior Side Yard and Rear Yard Setbacks. Interior side yard and rear yard setbacks including parking setbacks and loading facility setbacks apply only when the side or rear lot line is a Planned Commercial District boundary. C. Setbacks for PCD -3. The minimum building setback required by Paragraph B of Subd. 11 of this subsection shall be increased as follows: 1. In the area bounded by France Avenue on the west, York Avenue on the east and West 70th Street on the south, the minimum building setback shall be increased by 1/3 foot for each foot that the building exceeds 50 feet in building height. For purposes hereof, only those portions of buildings which exceeds 50 feet in building height need provide the additional setbacks required by this paragraph. 2. In all other areas, the minimum building setback shall be equal to the building height for buildings taller than 50 feet. Notwithstanding the requirement of this subsection, the City encourages i) ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment and ii) pedestrian connections by way of skyways and tunnels and, therefore, the City Council will consider exceptions to setback requirements for these purposes. 7M I' T'-M Section 6. Section 850.17, Subd. 3.G (PID, Planned Industrial District) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 3 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks, and Height. 4 G. Maximum Building Height. See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map Section 7. Section 850.18, Subd. 3.0 (RMD, Regional Medical District) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 3 Requirernenti for Building Coverage,. Setbacks, and Height, C. Maximum Building Height. No maximumi etpanomp4l _y re See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Maps— Section 8. Section 850 is hereby amended to add the follows: 850.22. Building Height Overlay District (HOD), ubd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish maximum uilding height regulations in order to minimize visual impact from tall uildings built within established neighborhoods in and around commercia nd industrial neiahborhoods r ubd. 2. Boundaries. The official boundaries for each Height Overlay, istrict are established on Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning MapJ ;ubd. 3. Maximum Building Heights. The following maximum buildinc eights are required within each of the following Height Overlay Districts OD -1 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, bu shall not exceed 1 story or 20 feet, whichever is less F OD -2 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, bu shall not exceed 2 stories or 24 feet, whichever is less.[— -IOD -3 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, bu shall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less.F— OD -4 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is less.�J HOD -8 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 8 stories or 96 feet, whichever is less.1� 5 OD -9 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 9 stories or 108 feet, whichever is less F OD -10 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 feet, whichever is less OD -12 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but' shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 feet, whichever is less C ...for living, learning, raising families& doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 —November, 2008 ---- Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight OR M UAR —D—At-0-0-1 0- Mill M S. MM -C PW F.-M—p- R MC U'- 2 • NC NC • 4 2 4 2 it r zi L ■ Height Limits S F - ' D 2 Stories: 24* 2 3 Stories: 36' z 4 Stories 48' 6 Stories: 77 NC NC Standard Height El U Podium Height Future Land Use Plan with City of Edina Building Heights 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Northeast Quadrant RgLir e 4.6A Data Source* URS Formatted: Highlight Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (November, 2008) .......... . .. .. 4-55 C ...for living• learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — November,, 2008 Future Land Use Plan with City of Edina Building Heights Southeast 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update outheastnua Figure e4.68 •`° Data Source: URS e f D Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (November,_ 2008) k'6 D 5 Mil6S l Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight 4 -56 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — November, 2008 2008 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan with ®R—City of Edina Building Heights Southwest Quadrant 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 4.6C Data Source: URS e o 0,5 Wes Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (Novemberr_2008) ------ 0 Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight 4 -57 WILSOW RD c EDEN AVE DETAIL o° e 11jm s s l� n ST r - Z. Q CAHILL RD it 7DTH DETAIL Rgnnepfin cauntyg Wnnasata Appendix ���n■na \�: `Null IIIII ip n■nI1111D Lunen• M � _ Its I� Nix�l[GiCCt I 1 I +i uc 44TH 9; FRANCE DETAIL r_ hii� ►�i �i I �I 54TH & FRANCE DETAIL ST Legend HOD -1 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 1 story or 20 feet, whichever is less. HOD -2 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 2 stories or 24 feet, whichever is less. HOD -3 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less. HOD-4' OD_4 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is less. Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, - — HOD but shall not exceed B stories or 96 feet, whichever is less. r HOD -9 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, u but shall not exceed 9 stories or 108 feet, whichever is less. u HOD-1 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 feet, whichever is less. HOD -12 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 feet, whichever is less. Church ffi City Buildings N � Private School Vd +E S Pi—h@ 7epl Public School M—h, 2o,0 i nin VALLEY VIEW & WODDDALE DE TAIL lima �s Min- am GE o��t e� �1u •.vv • REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Items III. B. & III. C. t GORDON HUGHES ® Action From: CITY MANAGER Discussion Date: JULY 6, 2010 Information Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -52 DIRECTING STUDY OF ROOFTOP RESTAURANTS ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -14 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON ROOFTOP RESTAURANTS IN EDINA ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -52 and Ordinance No. 2010 -14. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Recently, the City received building permit application materials for a new restaurant at 50th and France. As part of the application materials, the proponent is illustrating plans for rooftop dining as part of the restaurant. This feature may also be contemplated for other restaurants in the City. Based on concerns related to potential nuisance effects of such dining areas and the impact on parking availability, the Mayor has requested that the Council consider a moratorium on such rooftop dining areas pending further study. The attached ordinance and resolution would implement such a moratorium and initiate a study. The moratorium would affect all future rooftop restaurants throughout the City. The moratorium would last for one year but could be terminated sooner with Council's approval. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2010 -52 and Ordinance No. 2010 -14 fG .w RESOLUTION NO. 2010-52 RESOLUTION DIRECTING COMPLETION OF A STUDY ON THE REGULATION OF ROOFTOP RESTAURANTS AND PREPARATION OF OFFICIAL CONTROLS BASED UPON THAT STUDY WHEREAS, the City does not have specific regulations concerning rooftop restaurants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA AS FOLLOWS: Attest: 1. The City planning staff is directed to conduct a study to determine if rooftop restaurants should be allowed and if allowed how rooftop restaurants should be regulated within the City. 2. Based upon the study, the City staff and the City Attorney are directed to prepare a draft of any appropriate amendments to the City's official controls for consideration by the City Council. ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this sixth day of July, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of July 6, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this sixth day of July, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2010-14 • CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA mean: AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING ROOFTOP RESTAURANTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS: The following terms when used in this ordinance shall Rooftop Restaurant means a restaurant or any potion of a restaurant open to customers on the roof covering the highest floor of a building. Official Controls means ordinances and regulations which control the physical development of the City or any part thereof or any detail thereof and implement the general objectives of the comprehensive plan. Official controls include ordinances establishing zoning, subdivision controls, site plan regulations, sanitary codes, building codes and official maps. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND: The City does not have any regulations specific to rooftop restaurants which may, if not regulated, result in noise, odor, litter light, aesthetic and other unforeseen problems. SECTION 3. INTENT: It is the intent of this ordinance to allow the City of Edina time to conduct studies to evaluate rooftop restaurants and to consider changes in the City's official controls necessary concerning rooftop restaurants and in the interim to preserve the status quo. SECTION 4. TEMPORARY PROHIBITION: Pending the completion of the above referenced study and the adoption of appropriate official controls rooftop restaurants are prohibited, and no permits shall be processed or approved and no application for such approvals shall be accepted for rooftop restaurants. SECTION 5. EXEMPTIONS: The statutory exemptions to this ordinance set forth in Minnesota Statutes § 462.355, Subd. 4 are incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and shall remain in effect until the date of the adoption of the official controls contemplated hereunder and the repeal of this ordinance or June 30, 2011, whichever occurs first. ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 2010, by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota. o e ky • IN�ieee �// REPORPRECOM MEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. 111.13 From: Sherry Engelman ® Action Community Health F-1 Discussion Administrator Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Ordinance No. 2010 -10 Amending City Code Concerning Swimming Pools; Food Establishments and Food Vending Machines; and Hotels, Lodging and Boarding Houses ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2010 -10. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Edina holds a Delegation Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health to license, inspect and regulate public pools, food establishments and lodging establishments. By this Agreement, Edina is required to maintain and update ordinance language to be consistent with current applicable state statutes and rules. The attached ordinance reflects the required language updates. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved Ordinance No 2Q10 -10. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 2010 -10 ORDINANCE NO. 2010-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING SWIMMING POOLS; FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND FOOD VENDING MACHINES; AND HOTELS, LODGING AND BOARDING HOUSES THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 450.01 of the Edina City Code is amended by deleting or amending, as indicated, the following definitions: Swimming Pool. Any basin for holding water, designed for human use, with a water depth greater than 24 inches. Swimming pools include pools, publie e° semi pubke swinffning peels, residential swimming pools, residential special purpose pools and temporary above ground swimming pools. Section 2. The caption of Section 450.28 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: 450.28 Public Special Purpose Pool and Spa Pool. Section 3. Section 450.28 Subd. 1 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Subd. 1 Construction and Operation. Minnesota Statute Section 144.1222, except subdivisions 1 and la, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4717.0150 through 4717.3975 in WON EL Swimming Pool. Any basin for holding water, designed for human use, with a water depth greater than 24 inches. Swimming pools include pools, publie e° semi pubke swinffning peels, residential swimming pools, residential special purpose pools and temporary above ground swimming pools. Section 2. The caption of Section 450.28 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: 450.28 Public Special Purpose Pool and Spa Pool. Section 3. Section 450.28 Subd. 1 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Subd. 1 Construction and Operation. Minnesota Statute Section 144.1222, except subdivisions 1 and la, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4717.0150 through 4717.3975 in effect on the effective date of this Section, and all future revisions thereof, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this ordinance except where they are specifically amended by this Section. Any public pool, special purpose pool, or spa pool shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the pubRe and semi p provisions contained in the Minnesota Depa meat of Health Rules Ch 17.3975. Plans to construct a new swimming pool or remodel an existing swimming pool must be submitted to the Minnesota Department of Health for formal plan review and approval prior to any work being done. No person shall construct, alter, remodel, improve or repair a swimming pool without first obtaining required permits from the Building Official. Section 4. Section 721.03 Subd. 1 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Subd. 1 License Required. No person shall operate a food establishment or operate any of the following types of enterprises within the City without first obtaining a license of the applicable type described in this Section, pursuant to this Section: Low Risk Food Establishment Medium Risk Food Establishment High Risk Food Establishment Supervised Group Home Food Vehicle Food Vending Machine Itinerant Food Establishment Pushcart Food Establishment An additional fee will be required for the following food establishments: Beer or Wine Table Service Alcohol Service from a Bar Additional Facility Section 5. Section 721.05 of the Edina City Code is deleted: Section 6. Section 721.06 Subd. 1 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Subd. 1. Minnesota Food Code. Minnesota Statute Chapter 157.20 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 4626, except 4626.094-01755 through 4626. 7-01780,'he IM—neseta Feed Gede, in effelet e the eff letive date of this Seetie., and all future revisions thereof, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this ordinance except where they are specifically amended by this Section. Section 7. Section 721.06 Subd 2 of the Edina City Code is amended by amending the following definitions to provide as follows: Additional Facility Lieense is a food service or operation which is separate, distinct or unique from the central or main food establishment, as determined by the Health Authority. Low Risk, Medium Risk and High Risk Food Establishments are food establishments as defined in M.S. 157. Section 8. Section 721.06 Subd. 3 of the Edina City Code is amended by deleting the following provisions: 'A. E-keept as spele-ifi-ed in Win 2, finens. shall be mieehaniea!4, washed �.� • oil Nee 11", ; Section 9. Section 735.01 of the Edina City Code is amended by amending the following definitions: . _ �. Eli, • , _ .. , , _ . 'A. E-keept as spele-ifi-ed in Win 2, finens. shall be mieehaniea!4, washed �.� • oil Nee 11", ; Section 9. Section 735.01 of the Edina City Code is amended by amending the following definitions: Commissioner. As used in Minnesota Rules 499, Chapter 4625, "Commissioner" shall mean the City. Hotel, Lodging House, and Boarding House. Whenever used in this Section, the terms for hotel, lodging house and boarding house shall be as defined in M.S. c 1 � 157.15. Section 10. Section 735.04 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: 735.04 Standards Minnesota Rules, 19913 Adopted. Minnesota Statute Section 157.20 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4625, except 4625.2300, and all future revisions thereof, T4ere are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as a section of this Code. Minnesota 1991, Sections 4625 0100 sl,,...ugh 46225.2355 Requirements f T e,a, ing Establislunents. One copy marked "Official Copy" is on file in the office of the Clerk and shall remain on file for use and examination by the public. Section 11. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk r �D CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010. City Clerk o Le vtA4� • I�C�RPOPA9 1988 AGENDA ITEM: III.E. Presentation of League of Women Voters Study No packet data Oral presentation [-] Information coming /� ^rte o e #2 y • lry � • less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III.F. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -56 Identifying Need For Grant For Grandview District Report livable Community Act ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution identifying the need for livable communities demonstration account funding and authorizing an application for grant funds. (See attached application guide.) The purpose of the grant is to apply for funding to do a more in depth Small Area Plan for the Grandview District. Grant awards may be up to $100,000; grants require a 25% match. For every four grant dollars, the applicant contributes one additional dollar. Staff time may be used for the match. Applications are due July 19. If authorized by the Council, staff will be preparing the LCA grand application. Staff, the CAT, and the Design Team are still working on a Small Area Plan Guide report for approval by the City Council. However, the group would like to further develop the report into a Small Area Plan that would further advance the land use plan, possibly include a market analysis and financing plan, an infrastructure plan to address roadway improvements and utilities, and an implementation plan for how make the plan happen. :r 'Y RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -56 RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS the City of Edina is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program' for 2010 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to apply for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds; and WHEREAS The City has identified a proposed project within the city that meets: the Demonstration Account's purposes and criteria and is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council's adopted metropolitan development guide; and WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and WHEREAS the City agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the grant application submitted on July 19, 2010; and WHEREAS the City acknowledges Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre - Development grants are intended to fund activities that can prepare projects to apply for the LCDA Development Grant - category. WHEREAS only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities. Demonstration Account during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined Jt is appropriate to allocate those scarce grand funds only to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of Demonstration Account grand funding. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City; 1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City's development goals and ,priorities for the proposed activities to be performed for this particular Project Area site, as identified in the application, and at this particular time. 2. Finds that the project component(s) for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought: (a) Will not occur solely through private of other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and (b) Will not occur within two years after a grant award unless Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is made available for this project at this time. 3. Represents that the City has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to procure funding for the project activities for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought but was not able to find or secure from other sources funding that is necessary for completions of the activities within two years and states that this representation is based on the following reasons and supporting facts: The City of Edina does not have funds available within its budget to complete a Small Area Study of the Grand View District, and is unaware of any other funding source available for such a study. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area a "potential area of change" in need of a Small Area Plan to assist in future redevelopment. 4. Authorizes City staff to submit on behalf of the City an application for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre - Development Grant funds for the project activities identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City. Adopted this 6th day of July, 2010 Mayor Clerk Livable Communities ,Demonstration Account Pre- Development Grants 2010 Grant Application Guide Table of Contents Section 1: General Information for Development and Pre - Development Grants........................................................ ............................... 4 Backgroundand purpose ................................................... ............................... 4 Partnerships and coordination ............................................ ............................... 5 Definitionof terms ............................................................ ............................... 5 Eligibleapplicants ............................................................. ............................... 6 Awards for projects located in Minneapolis and Saint Paul ...... ............................... 6 Use of eminent domain ..................................................... ............................... 6 Reporting requirements for Development and Pre - Development grants .................. 7 Applicationprocess ............................................................ .............................13 Section2: Pre - Development grants ............................ ............................... 7 Eligible proposals for Pre - Development grants ...................... ............................... 7 Number of applications for Development and Pre - Development grants ................... 7 Eligible uses for Pre - Development grants ............................. ............................... 7 Ineligible uses for Pre - Development grants .......................... ............................... 8 Local resolution for Pre - Development grants ........................ ............................... 8 Local funding match for Pre - Development grants .................. ............................... 8 Award limits for Pre - Development grants ............................. ............................... 8 Grant term for Pre - Development grants .............................. ............................... 9 Evaluation process for Pre - Development grants .................... ............................... 9 2 Pre - Development grants Livable Communities Demonstration Account 2010 2010 Available Funding for LCDA Grants: $6.5 Million, including up to $1 Million for Pre - Development Grants Month Activity April Post grant application materials on www.metrocouncil.org April 28 and 29 Hold workshops for interested applicants May 28 Pre - applications due for Development grants (the pre - application process does not apply to LCDA Pre - Development grants in 2010) July 19 Applications due for Development and Pre - Development grants August 19 Last date local resolution can be submitted August - September Staff conducts technical review of proposals and Step 1 evaluation process August - October Livable Communities Advisory Committee conduct Step 2 evaluation and selection process; recommends funding awards for development and Pre - Development grants November Funding recommendations presented to Community Development Committee November Community Development Committee recommends grant awards Dec 2010 / Jan 2011 Metropolitan Council awards grants Pre - Development grants Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding Section 1: General Information for Development and Pre - Development Grants Background and purpose The Livable Communities Demonstration Account was established by the Livable Communities Act (LCA), Minnesota Statutes §473.25(b). The Demonstration Account provides funds to support development or redevelopment projects that connect development with transit, intensify land uses, connect housing and employment, provide a mix of housing affordability, and /or provide infrastructure to connect communities and attract investment. The Demonstration Account will also provide funds in 2010 for Pre - Development grants to support activities that will lay the groundwork for successful development implementation. Applicants will choose the Development or Pre - Development grant category for each project submitted for funding, depending upon the stage of the project's development. As the name of the account suggests, Demonstration Account funds are intended to be used for projects that demonstrate innovative and new ways to achieve and implement these statutory objectives, not merely to fill project funding needs. Development projects must include a development component or phase that will go forward to construction and be completed within the two -year grant term. Pre - Development grants will assist applicant cities with small grants to help them fund activities that will lead to projects that compete for dollars in the LCDA Development category. Funding for LCDA Development grants and Pre - Development grants helps applicants implement their community development objectives and comprehensive plans. The legislative objectives are supported by the 2030 Regional Development Framework policies. LCDA funding will support Development projects that demonstrate innovative ways of meeting Framework goals and Pre - Development proposals that show potential for achieving the goals. Framework goals include: • Develop land uses in centers linked to the local and regional transportation systems; • Efficiently connect housing, jobs, retail centers and civic uses; • Develop a range of housing densities, types and costs; and • Conserve, protect and enhance natural resources by means of development that is sensitive to the environment. In Developed Communities, the emphasis of these goals will be consistent with Framework direction on maintaining and improving infrastructure, buildings and land to provide developments that integrate land uses. Projects in Developing Communities will be focused on accommodating growth by means of connected development patterns for new development, supporting activity centers along 4 Pre - Development grants corridors that encourage the development of communities where shopping, jobs and a variety of housing.choices co -exist by design. Projects meeting these goals and funded through the LCDA program can help.;reduce: travel by eliminating or shortening vehicle trips, or by making some trips - possible by walking, biking or transit. These results are made possible by connecting land; uses, .improving access to. transportation corridors, connecting modes of transportation and linking housing with-destinations accessible to transportation, corridors .and. a range of transportation modes. Over the long run, results are expected to .reduce; air pollution, mitigate congestion, and reduce infrastructure costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The Metropolitan Council encourages LCDA funding proposals, that also reduce-energy use through siting, building orientation and innovative design of residential an'd other buildings. Partnerships and coordination The criteria and evaluation ,process are coordinated with state agency. - policies and initiatives so that funding consideration is given to projects that include or demonstrate: • Strategies to provide a continuum of affordable housing (Minnesota Housing); • Green Communities criteria for building Affordable Housing (Minnesota Housing); • The potential benefit of major state transportation. investments (Minnesota Department of Transportation); • Access management to maintain a safe flow of traffic while accommodating access needs of adjacent development (Minnesota Department of Transportation); • The Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines to encourage more sustainable building practices (Minnesota Departments of Administration and Commerce); • The land use goals of Project.2030, an initiative that identifies the impact of the aging of the baby boom generation and supports life - cycle housing (Minnesota Department of Human Services); • That the Natural Resources Inventory and Assessment (NRI /A), a region -wide database-and series of maps that records information about land and water resources, developed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Metropolitan Council, is implemented locally and used to plan proposals; and • Implementation of policies and requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for surface water management. Definition of terms, • Development Grants: The Project is the development or redevelopment project identified in the application for funds for which grant funds were requested and provides the deliverables upon which the application was scored. • Development Grants: The Grant - Funded Activities are components of the Project described in the application. The Grant - Funded Activities do not in and of themselves comprise the Project for which grant funds. are awarded. • Pre - Development Grants: The Project Area is the specific geographic -Project Area for which LCDA Pre - Development activities will be conducted. ,5 Pre- Development grants Affordable Housing is ownership or rental housing affordable to househoids'earning 60% or less of Area Median Income (AMI). Eligible',applicants The following are eligible to apply: statutory or home rule charter cities or towns that are participating in the Metropolitan Livable'Communities Housing Incentives Program;,. metropolitan counties and development authorities (e:g.; Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Economic Development Authority or Port Authority). All LCA - participant communities in good standing are eligible to apply for LCA funding. However, applications,awarded a grant for Projects located.in communities that have" not submitted a decennial comprehensive plan that is complete,for review will not be allowed °to receive any funding until the comprehensive plan is determined to be complete by the Council. Awards for projects located in Minneapolis and Saint Paul The Livable Communities Advisory Committee (LCAC) may recommend up to 40 percent of the total funds available in a grant cycle for projects'.located in Minneapolis and Saint Paul. The Council reserves the right to subsequently consider awarding more than 40 percent of the total available funds in the grant cycle to projects located in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, provided these` conditions are met: 1. The consideration :will. adhere to the project evaluation and scoring process outlines in these criteria ''and to the project rankings; and 2. Minneapolis and Saint Paul projects that, if granted funds, would result in a total that exceeds 40 percent of the available funding in the current grant cycle: a. are exemplary demonstrations'of the program criteria, as measured by these projects having scored at least 30 of 50 points in the Step Two LCAC evaluation process; and b. for Development grants: have scored a minimum of 7 of the 10 readiness points, as determined in the LCAC evaluation. Use of eminent domain No applicant for an LCA grant shall be eligible for LCA grant funds from the Metropolitan Council if the Project for which an LCA grant is requested requires the exercise of eminent domain authority over private property for purposes of economic development as defined by Council policy. The policy is available online at: http: / /www.metrocounci1.org/ services/ Iivcomm /EminentDomainPolicy.htm. The policy states that the prohibition regarding the use of eminent domain does not include "acquiring private property to remediate or clean up pollution or contamination.that threatens or may threaten public health or safety or the environment, if the Applicant certifies: (i) the property owner is unable or unwilling to pay for appropriate remediation or clean up; (ii) remediation or clean up must occur expeditiously to eliminate or mitigate the threat to public health qr safety or the environment; and (iii) no Responsible Party has been 6 Pre - Development grants identified or is financially capable or carrying out the remediation or clean up." Acquiring abandoned property or acquiring "blighted" property as that term "blighted" is defined and used in Minnesota Statutes chapter 469 also is an exception to the eminent domain policy. Reporting requirements for Development and Pre - Development grants LCDA grantees are required to make periodic progress reports. Detail supplied with payment requests comprises the bulk of these progress reports, which are augmented with semi - annual reports. A final progress report is required with the last payment request. When the grant is closed, the grantee's chief financial officer is required to certify to the appropriate expenditure of funds. Section 2: Pre - Development grants Eligible proposals for Pre - Development grants All of the following are required to comprise an eligible Pre - Development grant proposal: • The proposal must identify a specific geographic Project Area for which Pre - Development activities will be conducted. • The Project Area must be located within the Council- identified developed area, developing area or a rural growth center (urbanized area). Regional park land is ineligible. • The proposed activities must be completed within the 24 -month grant term; no grant term extensions will be permitted. Number of applications for Development and Pre - Development grants No more than six total applications, for Development and Pre - Development grants combined, may be submitted for projects in a single city in any application cycle. The limit of six applications includes those submitted by all entities within the city (i.e., the city, economic development authority, port authority, or other) and projects submitted by counties on behalf of cities. Applicants submitting more than one application per cycle (year) must prioritize them according to the applicant's internal priorities, prior to submittal. Eligible uses for Pre - Development grants Professional services associated with the following types of activities for the Project Area identified in the application: • conducting design workshops resulting in development alternatives; • preparing detailed redevelopment designs for specific projects that would implement neighborhood, downtown, corridor or station area plans; • analysis of alternatives for market mix, land use mix, economic feasibility, air /water /energy issues; • soil testing to determine land uses that are feasible on the site; Pre - Development grants • site - specific surface water management; • developing zoning and land use implementation tools such as overlay zones or zoning districts; • development staging plans; or • land banking and land acquisition strategies. Ineligible uses for Pre - Development grants All costs eligible for LCDA Development grants, including land acquisition, demolition, infrastructure, construction costs; applicant's administrative overhead; project coordination costs; costs for activities conducted prior to the date of the grant award; costs associated with preparing comprehensive plans; legal fees, local permits, licenses or authorization fees; travel expenses, food and beverages; costs associated with preparing other grant proposals; printing costs; salary costs; and /or marketing expenses. Local resolution for Pre - Development grants The resolution accompanying Pre - Development grant applications must: • Authorize the grant application(s); • Identify the need for LCDA funding, such that the proposed activities could not occur in the foreseeable future without LCDA funds; • Prioritize the applications according to the applicant's internal priorities, if an applicant is submitting more than one application; and • Applications submitted by county entities on behalf of projects located in LCA participating cities must also be supported by a resolution in support of the application from the city in which the project is located, as well as the resolution from the applicant county or development authority. • A resolution from the applicant city, county or development authority in support of the application(s) submitted must be submitted no later than 30 days after the application deadline. Local funding match for Pre - Development grants Grant awards must be matched by a 25% local contribution of the total amount requested, in cash and /or in -kind staff services (i.e., staff time allocated to completing eligible project activities). This means that the Applicant must contribute 25% of the requested amount over and above the requested amount. Put another way, for every four dollars of grant funds, the Applicant must contribute one additional dollar. Activities covered by the match must be grant - eligible activities and the match must be contributed after the date of the grant award. Dollar matches may include contributions from partners. The match applies to the total cost of the eligible activities, not to individual activities. This means that the match may be applied to some activities and not others in a list of more than one requested item, or may be pro -rated among a list of more than one requested item. See the SAMPLE PAGE (Sec I. C, Funding Request, Documentation of Match and Timeline) attached to the Pre - Development Grant application for how to report match information. s Pre - Development grants Award limits for Pre - Development grants Pre - Development grant awards will not exceed $100,000. Grant term for Pre - Development grants Pre - Development grants awarded in 2010 will have a 24 -month grant term and will not be eligible for any extensions. Evaluation process for Pre - Development grants Applications for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre - Development grants will be reviewed by the 13- member LCAC, which makes funding recommendations to the Council. The committee includes members representing six areas of expertise to provide the range of skills and experience necessary for evaluating the complex development and redevelopment projects for which LCDA funding is requested. Areas of expertise (for which there are two members each) are: local government (planning, economic or community development); development finance (one member in private finance, one in public finance); development (one member in new development, one in redevelopment); transportation; environment; and site design. The LCAC chair, not representing a specific area of expertise, is the 13th member. LCDA applications are evaluated in a two -step process. A staff evaluation team will review and score eligible Pre - Development grant proposals using the Step One evaluation criteria and guidelines. The LCAC will conduct Step Two of the evaluation process for Pre - Development grants. Applications must score 20 or more points to advance to the Step Two evaluation process. A staff evaluation team will review and score eligible proposals using the Step One evaluation criteria and guidelines: 9 Pre - Development grants io Pre - Development grants Step One Evaluation - • r Pre-Developme 1 possible points Applications must score 20 or more points to advance to the Step Two evaluation process. A.staff evaluation team will review and score eligible proposals using the Step One evaluation criteria and guidelines: 1. Land use criteria Proposals will be evaluated on the extent to which the proposal will address or shows potential to address the following criteria, as applicable to the site location, geographic location and the community context. Proposals will be evaluated according to the appropriate developed or developing context of the project itself, not its developed or developing community classification. A. Use land efficiently 0 - 8 points How well the proposal shows potential to result in development that intensifies land use (adding buildings or other uses) and increases density to a level that maximizes the potential of the location. B. Develop land uses linked to the local and regional 0 - 10 points transportation systems (if the proposed Project does not have access to transit as identified in this section, the proposal will be held harmless by assigning the average score for this section). Location within a one -half mile radius of the following - 3 points. possible An existing or identified station on the following 3 points transitways: Hiawatha LRT, Central Corridor LRT, Northstar Commuter OR Rail, or Southwest LRT; I -35W BRT, Cedar Avenue BRT, I -394 HOT /HOV Lane; or A park- and -ride facility on an express commuter bus or express bus route Locations where stations are under study along the 2 points OR Bottineau, Rush Line or Red Rock transitways Potential stations along these future transitways where 1 point no mode or stations have been identified: I -35 W North; I -94 East; Central Avenue; TH 36 /NE Or locations within a one - quarter mile radius of the following - 3 points possible A fixed stop on a high- frequency bus route; or 3 points A stop on future arterial BRT corridors: Snelling Avenue /Ford Parkway, West Broadway, Nicollet Avenue, Chicago Avenue, East 7th Street, Robert Street, West 7th Street American Boulevard io Pre - Development grants How well the project will achieve development that is AND 0 -7 designed in relationship to transit and transportation: by points providing optimal convenience for pedestrian access to transit, and for relationships of development to the regional transits stem. C. Connect housing and centers of employment, 0 - 8 points education, retail, and recreation uses The extent or degree to which the project shows potential to result in development that will provide a diverse variety of uses (within the project area or when added to adjacent land uses) with improved jobs- housing balance and access to a variety of destinations in a connected development pattern, both within the Project Area and to adjacent neighborhoods D. Develop a range of housing densities, types and 0 - 8 points costs The extent or degree to which the proposal shows potential to result in development that includes a wide variety of housing types and prices or rents, by integrating new housing into existing neighborhoods through redevelopment, infill development, adaptive reuse; or through new development in developing communities - within the Project Area or when added to the housing in adjacent neighborhoods; will diversify housing in the community; will help achieve the city's negotiated affordable and lifecycle housing goals. E. Conserve, protect and enhance natural resources 0 - 8 points through development that is sensitive to the environment The extent or degree to which the proposal shows potential and provides opportunities to achieve development that optimally integrates natural resources, including best management practices that incorporate water resource management into project design to maximize development potential; will implement and use a local Natural Resources Inventory and Assessment (NRI /A) to plan the project; and shows potential and provides opportunities to employ natural resources, where feasible and appropriate, as community connections, assets and amenities. 11 Pre - Development grants 2. Potential to implement local and regional goals The extent to which the proposal: 0 - 8 points • shows potential to implement the applicant city's local comprehensive plan; • shows potential to help achieve the city's negotiated affordable and lifecycle housing goals; • will implement any redevelopment plans, corridor or other local plans applicable to the identified Project Area; and • the extent to which the proposed grant activities appropriately support the intent of the proposal Pre-Development Step Two Evaluation Criteria for possible points The LCAC will score proposals according to the evaluation and selection criteria in Step Two. To be considered for funding, proposals must score 30 or more points of a possible 50 points in the Step Two evaluation, or be supported by a majority of the advisory committee members voting. 1. Innovation and demonstration The extent to which the project shows potential to 0 - 20 points demonstrate new development concepts or elements in one or more of the scoring areas, for the community in which it is located and for the region. Scoring is based on the extent to which the proposal shows potential to: • use land efficiently to maximize the potential of the project location; • link land uses to transportation and transit where available; maximizes major state transportation investments; • connect housing and centers of employment, education, retail, civic uses and recreation; • provide a range of housing densities, types and costs; • conserve, protect and enhance natural resources through development that is sensitive to the environment; • utilize tools and processes to develop and implement the project, including consistency with area, neighborhood, corridor or other plans adopted by the municipality; • represent a model, in whole or in part, for the community it is located in and for the region; or • represent other innovation not covered in the above categories. 12 Pre - Development grants 2. How LCDA funding is a catalyst The extent to which the element for which funding is requested will be a 0 -10 points catalyst to implement development in the Project Area. Proposals will be evaluated in the context of the site, geographic area and community to recognize the unique and diverse characteristics of projects' location. 3. Potential for successful implementation • Local leadership, political commitment and community 0 - 20 points involvement to date. • Potential for meaningful and appropriate public involvement in carrying out the activities funded by an LCDA Pre - Development grant. • The potential for a project implementation process that includes appropriate partners and coordination to ensure successful project implementation. • The extent to which the proposed grant activities appropriately support the intent of the proposal Potential to implement local, regional and LCDA program goals • The degree to which the proposal presents an opportunity to capitalize on unique opportunities offered by the Project Area. Additionally, would opportunities presented by the Project Area be jeopardized if the applicant does not act in a timely way to direct the development process? • The potential to enhance major regional investments. • The potential for replication of the project, key elements of the project, or the project type. Application process Interested applicants may obtain an application packet by calling or writing to the Metropolitan Council or by downloading it from the Council's website at http: / /www.metrocouncil.orq /services /livcomm /LCAresources htm #LCDA. Any questions should be directed to the LCDA program coordinator at 651 - 602 -1385. This Notice of Funding Availability is subject to applicable federal, state, and municipal laws, rules and regulations. The Metropolitan Council reserves the right to modify or withdraw this Notice of Funding Availability at any time. 13 Pre - Development grants SAMi PAGE 2 OF THE LCDA PRE- DEVELG_ _JENT GRANT APPLICATION 'yMetropolita .ncii Sec. I. B. Project Funding Request, Documentation of Match and Timeline (Limit one page, landscape layout) A Grant Request: List specific tasks in order of priority or sequence to accomplish the project objectives. Under "responsible person(s)," list who will be doing the work, including consultants (identified or proposed) and city staff or others. Match: Grant awards must be matched by a 25% local contribution of the total amount requested, in cash and/or in -kind staff services (i.e., staff time allocated to completing eligible project activities). This means that the Applicant must contribute 25% of the requested amount over and above the requested amount. Put another way, for every four dollars of grant funds, the Applicant must contribute one additional dollar. Activities covered by the match must be grant- eligible activities and the match must be contributed after the date of the grant award. Dollar matches may include contributions from partners. The match applies to the total cost of the eligible activities, not to individual activities. This means that the match may be applied to some activities and not others in a list of more than one requested item, or may be pro -rated among a list of more than one requested item. GRANT iY O ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY REQUEST FOR THIS MATCH'. EXPECTED OUTCOME(S) OR` DELIVERABLES OF THIS WORK'.. RESPONSIBLE � PERSON(S), START DATE END DATE a ACTIVITY , ,. For eligible uses, see page 7 of the LCDA Pre-Development Grant Funding riteria g Cost, not including By line item or List the deliverable (report, etc. } - Tdentify staff or MM/YY Iv1M/YY match prorated consultants 1 Alternatives analysis — examine land use mix $14,000 $4,000 Development alternatives report Staff & XYZ Jan-2011 June 201,1 Consultants 2 Alternatives analysis — examine market mix, economic feasibility $20,000 $5,000 Market alternatives report ABC Consultant June 2011 Dec 2011 (proposed) 3 Prepare development staging plan $11,000 $2,250 Development staging plan Staff and XYZ Jan 2012 March 2012 Consultants 4. _' L G 5 6 Grant Totals Match Sources Amount Source(s) Total Grant Request $45,000 Total Dollar Match $5,000 City Funds Total Match $11,250 In -Kind Match $6,250 Staff Total Grant plus Match $56,250 Total Match $11,250 ACommDevlLivComm\LCDA\Fundinu CvdeU010\2010 Pre -Dev (Inni xnnf —inn h.,do , 1rTA, 0 (Le Vii\ Cn REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. G. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action Discussion El Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -53 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Counci have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -53 City must be adopted by a I accepting the donation. I donors, their gifts and the RESOLUTION NO. 2010-53 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Kay Bach Barbara Kaufman Edina Park Department: Edina Public Art Committee Edina Soccer Club Edina Soccer Association Barr Engineering Dated: July 6, 2010 Attest: $100.00 Greer Garden $25.00 Greer Garden MN Eco Turtle Sculpture $70.00 Portable Restrooms — Pamela Park $70.00 Portable Restrooms — Pamela Park $5,000.00 Trees & Park Bench — Pamela Park Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 6, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 Y ow Le �t4 CD 0 ay REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Ill. H. GORDON HUGHES ® Action From: CITY MANAGER Discussion Date: JULY 6, 2010 Information Subject: ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION VACANCY ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss appointment to fill vacancy. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Recently, Commissioner Jeannie Hanson submitted her resignation from the EEC. Staff requests that the Council discuss the process they wish to use for filling this vacancy. This term ends in February, 2012. EEC Chair Plunkett Latham sent the attached e-mail summarizing her views on the appointment. In short, she recommends that the Council not fill the position at the present time, but instead wait until the end of the year when annual appointments are made. If the Council wishes to proceed with the appointment, it can select from individuals who have previously been interviewed or we can issue a press release soliciting new applications. ATTACHMENT: E -mail from Dianne Plunkett Latham From: Dianne Plunkett Latham [mailto: Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 10:55 AM To: Ann Swenson; James B. Hovland; Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle; Scot Housh Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: Resignation of Jeannie K. Hanson from EEC 6 -11 -10 Honorable Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, I regret to inform you of the resignation of Jeannie K. Hanson from the Edina Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) . EEC appreciates the work Commissioner Hanson has done for EEC for the past year and we wish her the best in her environmental pursuits on the North Shore, where she has her second home and plans to work on environmental issues. I recommend that you do not fill the position at this time, but wait until the annual December applications. EEC has two new commissioners who we are presently training, and I think it best if EEC continues to focus our mentoring efforts on them. Also, numbers of applicants are likely to be low during the summer as fewer residents read the city communications due to vacations. Applications are generally high during December as residents are aware that this is the typical time for commission applications. Commissioner Hanson's term expires on 2 -1 -12. I request that the new commissioner be given a term to expire 2 -1 -14. EEC presently has 10 voting commissioners, of which, 5 terms expire on 2 -1 -12 and 5 terms expire on 2 -1 -13. I recommend that we move to a cycle where 3 terms expire in 2 -14 and 3 terms expire in 2012, with either 3 or 4 terms expiring in 2013. As we experience turnover on EEC I ask Council to be mindful of adjusting the term expiration dates per the above recommended schedule. If you have any questions regarding these recommendations, do not hesitate to contact me. Dianne Plunkett Latham Chair, Edina Energy & Environment Commission 7013 Comanche Ct Edina MN 55439 -1004 952- 941 -3542 w9t��r� O� �+ H Information & Background Attached is. an Ordinance amendment that would bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan. (See pages Al A4.) The Ordinance establishes height regulations as prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. (See the. approved Comprehensive Plan on pages A5—A7.) The Ordinance would establish a Building Height Overlay District across all of the City's commercial, industrial and high density residential zoning districts. (See attached maps.) Recommendation /Conclusion Staff recommends approvalz of the attached ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by.the Commission. Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague February 24, 2010 2009.0004.1Ob Director of Planning Information & Background Attached is. an Ordinance amendment that would bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan. (See pages Al A4.) The Ordinance establishes height regulations as prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. (See the. approved Comprehensive Plan on pages A5—A7.) The Ordinance would establish a Building Height Overlay District across all of the City's commercial, industrial and high density residential zoning districts. (See attached maps.) Recommendation /Conclusion Staff recommends approvalz of the attached ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by.the Commission. Topic:. Building Height Date Introduced: February 24, 2010 Date of Discussion: March 10, 2010 Why on the list: The Zoning Ordinance must be brought into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. History: Building height has been an ongoing issue „from the time of the Southdale Area study through the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan prescribes specific building height limitations. Decision Point: What format should the Ordinance revisions take. Options: 1. Establish an overlay district. 2. Write regulations for each area described in the Comprehensive Plan. The City Attorney has advised that the City must have the same standards within each zoning district. Cities cannot require different standards within the same zoning district. Since the Comprehensive Plan prescribes different height maximums on properties that are zoned the same, the City Attorney has - recommended establishing height overlay districts across the City for all commercial, industrial, and higher density residential land use. For Discussion: At last month's regular Planning Commission meeting, the Commission asked staff to consider adding in provisions that address the issue of "podium height:” When the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan, there was language in the Plan that gave direction to address podium height. The idea was to have a "standard height" and a "maximum height." However, as noted in the attached document (page 4 -56), much.of that language was removed from the-Plan by the City Council. The Plan was amended to simply have a standard height. Podium heights could still be achieved by the requirement that the building height shall be determined by required setbacks, or the setback is equal to the building height. Additionally, podium heights could be further, addressed by encouraging buildings to be pulled closer to the street, using Ian guage similar to the City's existing ordinance language in the PCD District as follows: "Notwithstanding the requirement'.of this subsection, the City encourages i) ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment and ii) pedestrian connections by way of skyways and tunnels and, therefore, the City Council will consider exceptions to setback requirements:for these purposes." Similar language could be added to the new height overlay district, 'including some "podium height" language. We could encourage one- twostories within the required setback and anything above two stories meet the setback and height standard. This would still require a variance or a PUD; however, it would also give the City 'much more control over "podium, height." This provision could be included in the PUD, PC,D, MDD, POD.andPID Districts. for living, learning, raising families & doing business ;-� ,' 2008 Comprehensive Plan ,Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — November,. 2008 6. Facade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well- defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks or similar techniques. 7. Transparency and Natural Surveillance. Building forms and facades should provide an awareness of the activity within the buildings through frequent doors and windows oriented toward public streets and open space. 8. Variety of Building Forms. Encourage an integrated mix of building types, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. 9. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks and public spaces. {Formatted: Highlight J Formatted: Highlight 10. Building Heights. The question of building height is particularly significant in a largely developed community, where any new building has the potential to block views or cast shadows on established neighborhoods and land uses. The design guidelines above, as well as the recommended building heights-ieiew-,in ------------ - Formatted: Strikethrough Figures 4.6A. 4.6B, and 4.6C, provide general guidance for buildings that exceed Formatted: Strlkethrough, Highlight the typical residential height of 2.5 stories: Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (November,, 2008) - 4 -51 1 2008 Comprehensive Plan for living, learning, raising families &doing business `.- .lr li ,Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — November, 2008 -= Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Edina already has many tall buildings, but not all of them provide the kind of transition outlined in Principle 9 above. Building height should be considered within the larger urban design context,, Formatted: Strike-through S ------------------ _ ____ - Formatted: Strikethrough, Highlight illustrated in the photos below. _ - Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight L Formatted: Highlight Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (November, 2008) 4 -52 y for living, learning, raising families & doing business i, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — November, 2008 }�. ✓3vs1.'ji:lf�FlYw:Lii3Lit� Because of the limited number of locations where tall buildings can be sited, and the need for sensitivity to surrounding uses, the following Height Maps have been established for those parts of the city with potential for higher density development. The maps were developed to specify the following height measurements: Podium Height: The "podium" is that part of the building that abuts the street, or that provides the required transition to residential neighborhoods, parks, and other sensitive uses. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (November,, 2008) Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Strikethrough, Highlight Formatted: Highlight 4 -53 -.for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan M. ,Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — November,. 2008 Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Standard Height: This height measurement extends to the top of the building (building height is measured as specified in the Zoning Ordinance)„ !er development PFGjeGt6 that do Ret iRGIude 9F meet Formatted: Wkethmugh, Highlight d„",etensebetween the „ + Rd d„ d the m„ has „+ been Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Strikethrough, Highlight QFdiRaRGe). In At-rtR6n Ins tiens, the "maximum" height may be- �a VT i ti w jr A. .Will, , F `Podium beight" building examples Maximum heights in eaGh GategeFy are shown iR FiguFes 4.6A, 4.68 and 4 6G Formatted: Strikethrough, Highlight Formatted: Strikethrough Formatted: Highlight Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (November,_ 200p) 4 -54 Min es of the Planning Commission Meeting Februa 24, 2010 Page 3 of 7 ® ° eplace . "Established Average Setback" with-"Established. Flat Street Setback".` ® Replhce "When lots representim�g-more than 25 percent of the frontagea',with; "When more. th"An 26% of the lots'. m Strike : Without a princi.p6( building Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye., motion carried. Chair Fischer said the front yard setback requirements would be added to the "bucket list " <es continuing discussion during the update review process. r I�>Ie NEVI'/ BUSINESS: Ordinance Amendment: Building Height, PlannerPresentation Planner Teague presented an Ordinance amendment that would bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan. The Ordinance establishes height regulations as prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague explained that the Ordinance would establish a Building Height Overlay District across the City's entire commercial, industrial and high density residential zoning districts. Planner Teague said this Overlay District.would be similar to the overlay district in the Country Club and Flood Zone districts. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the Ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. Discussion Commissioner Schroeder commented that as he viewed the proposed overlay district map he was struck by two issues in particular; the first 54th/ France and Valley ViewNVooddale. Commissioner Schroeder said in both these areas there are parcels with a building height limitation of 1 -story (HOD -1) surrounded by parcels that are allowed to build up to 4- stories. Commissioner Schroeder said he doesn't see any logic in that. Planner Teague responded and explained the reason is that the parcel(s) limited to 1 -story are presently zoned PCD -4, which is the zoning designation for gas stations, etc. Planner Teague said a rezoning and an amendment to the overlay district map would need to be done to allow building height in excess of 1 -story on those parcels. Miruufes of the Planning Commission Meeting February 24, 2010 Page 4 of -7 - - - - — -- - - - - - - - - Commissioner Schroeder said the second issue was the incremental 12- feet =1 story, and asked Planner Teague how he came up'�'with the 12 feet. Continuing, Commissioner Schroeder pointed Out in certain areas (50th &;France) the first floor /story of a building, be it, commercial or another use, would need`'to be taller, possibility as high as 16 feet in order to. achieve the right balance at street level. Commissioner: Schroeder said in his opinion a 4 -story building With.a first floor of 12 -feet would appear squatty. Commissioner, Schroeder said this approach could limit design options. Planner Teague responded the 12 -feet was taken from the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague added it is difficult since the Comp pl'anaprescribe's different height maximums on parcels zoned the same. Commissioner`Schroeder acknowledged that number came from the Comp Plan and the goal of the plan was to limit building height; however, he reiterated he doesn't believe the intent of the Comprehensive Plan was to limit design. Commissioner Forrest said in her.opinion the Building Height Overlay District map would be able. to add flexibility separate from what a property is zoned. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague how he "arrived" at the Height Overlay District Map. Planner Teague explained that the City needs uniform regulations within the same zoning district, adding his first attempt was to write a description for each area. Planner Teague reported in discussion with the City Attorney it was felt that the best way to achieve uniformity between the Ordinance and the Comp Plan was through an overlay district. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague if the Height. Overlay District map needs to match the underlying zoning. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Schroeder questioned how podium height would be achieved. Planner Teague responded podium heights Would be achieved through the requirement that the building height shall be determined by required setbacks, ,or a setback equal to building height: Commissioner Forrest said that she finds the 'Building Height Overlay District map to be a useful tool. Commissioner Risser said as she looked at the overlay map, in the area of Valley ViewAtVooddale where 4- stories are allowed there is no mention or acknowledgement anywhere that there is a lake system in that area called the Nancy Lakes. ,:Planner Teague clarified that the overlay map is only intended to reflect building height. Commissioner Risser commented she was just concerned because other bodies of water were called out on the map but not this system. Planner:Teague acknowledged that area of water wasn't on the map. Chair Fischer suggested that staff should check if that system was included on the underlying map. Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting February 24, 2010 Page 3 of 7 The discussion continued focusing on the intent of the Comprehensive Plan versus the zoning classification of particular parcels. The Commission felt that the real goal was to develop and maintain character districts, acknowledging that may be hard to achieve if building height is tied strictly to the underlying zoning. Chair Fischer said he doesn't believe anything formal needs to be done on this topic, pointing out it's the "first showing" of the Building Height Overlay District map. Planner Teague said for the next meeting he would bring back to the Commission provisions that address the issue of podium height. Chair Fischer asked if anyone would like to speak to this topic. Public Comment John Bohan, 800 Coventry, addressed the Commission and stated he applauds the Planner for finding a creative way to address building height. Mr. Bohan said it may not be perfect; but it's a great start. Continuing, Mr. Bohan said he reviewed the proposed revised Ordinance language and didn't find a mention of podium height or a definition in the revision. Mr. Bohan said when the Comprehensive Plan was approved in 2008 it was after a long and deliberate discussion and during that discussion period neighborhood /character districts were mentioned in relationship to building height. Mr. Bohan said when viewing the materials it appeared to him that the height determined for Centennial Lakes is four stories, pointing out that the Coventry townhomes are just two stories. Concluding, Mr. Bohan questioned the four story designation. COMMUNITY COMMENT: �r John Bohan, K0_ Coventry Way, asked what the meaning of slated- 4s-under Community Comment. Planner Teague clarified that the community comment period provides an opportunity for residents to ask questions or give their input on an issue that is not currently under review by the- Oouncil /and/or. Boards and Commissions or if an application has been ma-def. . -- Planner Teague said he believes the goal is to allow residents (at_ny one of the public meetings and hearings) a time to be heard. ,. V. OTHER BUSINESS: Topic: Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Intent, Goals or Purpose Date Introduced: January 13, 2010 Date of Discussion: February 24, 2010 Topic: BuHding Hedg t Date Introduced: February 249 2010 Date of Discussion: March 1 09 2010 Wiry on the iisto The Zoning Ordinance must be brought into compliance with the Comprehensive.Plan. ` History: Building height has been an ongoing issue from the time of.the Southdale Area study through the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan prescribes specific building height limitations. Decision Pointe What format should the Ordinance revisions take. Options: 1. Establish an overlay district. 2. Write regulations for each area described in the Comprehensive Plan. The City Attorney has advised that the City must have the same standards within each zoning district. Cities cannot require different standards within the same zoning district. Since the Comprehensive Plan prescribes different height maximums on properties that are zoned the same, the City Attorney has.,... recommended establishing height overlay districts across the City for all commercial, industrial, and higher density residential land use. - For Discussion: At last month's regular _Planning Commission meeting, the, Commission asked staff to consider adding in provisions that address the issue of "podium height." When the Planning Commission recommended approval.of the Comprehensive Plan, there was language in the Plan that gave direction to address podium height. The idea was to have .a "standard height" and .a "maximum height." However, as noted in the,ettached document (page 4 -56), much of that language was removed from the Plan by the City Council. The Plan was amended to simply have a standard. height. Podium heights could still be achieved by the requirement that the building height shall be determined by required setbacks, or the setback is equal to the building height. Additionally, podium heights could be further addressed by encouraging buildings to be pulled closer to the street, using language similar to the City's existing ordinance language in the PCD District as follows: "Notwithstanding the „requirement of this subsection, the City encourages i) ground level retail and "service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment and ii) pedestrian connections by way of skyways and tunnels and, therefore, the City Council will consider exceptions to setback requirements 6 these purposes." Similar language could be added to the new height overlay district, including some "podium height” language. We cou d encourage one -two stories within the required setback and anything above two stories meet the setback and height standard. This would -still require a variance or a PUD;. however, it would also give the City much more control over "podium height:" This provision could be included in the PUD, PCD,. MDD, POD and PID Districts. 2 ..tor iivsng, leamir4g rao ft famTes a dofgbanirmw ION Cornpretrensire P W ,Edina Com p Plan tI Q'-te 2008 –Noi Ember, 2003 --------------- - ---- --------- ------------------ S. Fagade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well- defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks or similar techniques. 7. Transparency and Natural I—— _ Surveillance. Building forms and facades should provide an awareness of the activity within the buildings through frequent doors and windows oriented toward public streets and open space. B. Variety of Building Forms. Encourage an integrated mix of building types, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. 9. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks and public spaces. _ F Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight 10. Building Heights. The question of building height is particularly significant in a largely developed community, where any new building has the potential to block views or cast shadows on established neighborhoods and land uses. ^ The —,. design guidelines above, as well as the recommended building heights. , ; Fmr�attr : 5fikelhrDu" provide general guidance for buildings that exceed Foru�at ed: Stnkethrouah, Kghligh the typical residential height of 2.5 stories: FDrr�ai: Highlight Edina Comp Plan Update 2006 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (lJorember_ 200'f Form ght 4 -51 A , J iur living, learning. raising families & dcxng busrcss _ 2DD8 Coniprehen sive Plan Dina Comp Plan Update 2008— November_ 2008 ---------------------------------------- ----------- __- Formatted: Highlght i r-oi-matted: Highlight Edina already has many tall buildings, but not all of them provide the kind of transition outlined in Principle 9 above. Building height should be considered within the larger urban design context S} R Gf--all the _- Formatted: Strikethrough .. '^ 'j ' ..'t;:a �_-- - - - - -_ Formatted: Strlkethrough, Highlight = _ ------ -- ------- -- -------- - -- Forma tea: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Farrna)Ued: Highlight i �� --N P Wiz- Fri P E t .� f y Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (!!ov_ uati2003) _______ Form-;rLt'ed: Highlight 4 -52 All . =� i -Aorovin& Naming. raising fama��& dz,,:'����` �! ' | CoToPkan 2008 —Nc 2008 2onBCun"prehersi~ePlan r.o^ t, ,-- � Formatted: Highlight Because of the limited number of locations where tall buildings can Ue sited, and the need for sensitivity to | surrounding uses, the following Height | 1 Isli Maps have been established for those � parts of the city with potential for higher density development. Thenn�pswere developed to specify the foUov�nghaight rneoaunamanta: ~ Podium Height: The ^oodiurn^ia that po�of the building that abuts the street, orthat '� pro vidoethe required transition to residential neighborhoods, parks, ghrighl '. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Form ied: Highlight -' for Iwing.learning. raising families & doing business :008 Comprehensive Plan ,Ec+ina Comp Plan Update 2G08 — November,, t - oO ilight ---------------------------------------------- - - - - -= - rormaLted: Highlight s Standard Helig ft This height measurement extends to the top of the building (building height is measured as specified in the Zoning Ordinance).; Gr c' - trial dti .. ...ol:, FR&&! Formatted: Stikethrouah, Highlight diffeF Rse detWeen ;9;e "standard" and Fh9 = Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting Februa,904, 2010 Page 3 0 ®;"'�eplace "Established Avera Rr Street Setback ". ro with "Established ® Repla "When lots r esenting more than 25 percent of.the frontage" ' "W rnoreAh. an 25% of the lots: ® Strike Withou Zerincipal building Commissioner Gr ref seconded motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair F.isc aid the front yard setback req ikkments would.be added to the "bucke as continuing discussion during the to review process. III. NEW BUSINESS: Ordinance Amendment: Building Height Planner Presentation Planner Teague presented an Ordinance amendment that would bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan. The Ordinance establishes height regulations as prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague explained that the Ordinance would establish a Building Height Overlay District across the City's entire commercial, industrial and high density residential zoning districts. Planner Teague said this Overlay District would be similar to-the overlay district in the Country Club and Flood Zone districts. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the Ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. Discussion Commissioner Schroeder commented that as he viewed the proposed overlay district map he was struck by two issues in particular; the first 54th France and Valley View/Wooddale. Commissioner Schroeder said in both these areas there are parcels with a building height limitation of 1 -story (HOD -1) surrounded by parcels that are allowed to build up to 4- stories. Commissioner Schroeder said he doesn't see any logic in that. Planner Teague responded and explained the reason is that the parcel(s) limited to 1 -story are presently zoned PCD -4, which is the zoning designation for gas stations, etc. Planner Teague said 'a rezoning and an amendment to the overlay district map would need to be done to allow, building height in excess of 1 -story on those parcels. Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting February 24, 2010 Page 4 of 7 Commissioner Schroeder said the second issue was the incremental 12- feet =1 story, and asked Planner Teague how he came up with the 12 feet. Continuing, Commissioner Schroeder pointed out in certain areas (50th & France) the first floor /story of a building, be it commercial or another use, would need to be taller, possibility as high as 16 feet in order to achieve the right balance at street level. Commissioner Schroeder said in his opinion a 4 -story building with a first floor of 12 -feet would appear squatty. Commissioner Schroeder said this approach could limit design options. Planner Teague responded the 12 -feet was taken from the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague added it is difficult since the Comp plan prescribes different height maximums on parcels zoned the same. Commissioner Schroeder acknowledged that number came from the Comp Plan and the goal of the plan was to limit building height; however, he reiterated he doesn't believe the intent of the Comprehensive Plan was to limit design. Commissioner Forrest said in her opinion the Building Height Overlay District map would be able to add flexibility separate from what a property is zoned. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague how he "arrived" at the Height Overlay District Map. Planner Teague explained that the City needs uniform regulations within the same zoning district, adding his first attempt was to write a description for each area. Planner Teague reported in discussion with the City Attorney it was felt that the best way to achieve uniformity between the Ordinance and the Comp Plan was through an overlay district. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague if the Height Overlay District map needs to match the underlying zoning. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Schroeder questioned how podium height would be achieved. Planner Teague responded podium heights would be achieved through the requirement that the building height shall be determined by required setbacks, or a setback equal to building height. Commissioner Forrest said that she finds the Building Height Overlay District map to be a useful tool. Commissioner Risser said as she looked at the overlay map, in the area of Valley View/Wooddale where 4- stories are allowed there is no mention or acknowledgement anywhere that there is a lake system in that area called the Nancy Lakes. Planner Teague clarified that the overlay map is only intended to reflect building height. Commissioner Risser commented she was just concerned because other bodies of water were called out on the map but not this system. Planner Teague acknowledged that area of water wasn't on the map. Chair Fischer suggested that staff should check if that system was included on the underlying map. Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting February 24, 2010 Page 5 of 7 The discussion continued focusing on the intent of the Comprehensive Plan versus the zoning classification of particular parcels. The Commission felt that the real goal was to develop and maintain character districts, acknowledging that may be hard to achieve if building height is tied strictly to the underlying zoning. Chair Fischer said he doesn't believe anything formal needs to be done on this topic, pointing out it's the "first showing" of the Building Height Overlay District map. Planner Teague said for the next meeting he would bring back to the Commission provisions that address the issue of podium height. Chair Fischer asked if anyone would like to speak to this topic. Public Comment John Bohan, 800 Coventry, addressed the Commission and stated he applauds the Planner for finding a creative way to address building height. Mr. Bohan said it may not be perfect; but it's a great start. Continuing, Mr. Bohan said he reviewed the proposed revised Ordinance language and didn't find a mention of podium height or a definition in the revision. Mr. Bohan said when the Comprehensive Plan was approved in 2008 it was after a long and deliberate discussion and during that discussion period neighborhood /character districts were mentioned in relationship to building height. Mr. Bohan said when viewing the materials it appeared to him that the height determined for Centennial Lakes is four stories, pointing out that the Coventry townhomes are just two stories. Concluding, Mr. Bohan questioned the four story designation. COMMUNITY COMMENT: John Bo 800 Coventry Way, asked what the meaning of slated is under Community ment. Planner Teague clarified that the community comment period provides portunity for residents to ask questions or give their input on an issue that is n iurrently under review by the Council /and /or Boards and Commissions or if an ap tion has been made. Planner Teague said he believes the goal is to allow *'(dents (at any one of the public meetings and hearings) a time to be heard. V. OTHER BUSINESS: `\ Topic: Pig P,u Date Introduced' Date of Dis $"ion: Unit Developm e January 13, 2010 February 24, 2010 (PUD) — Intent, Goals or e Zoning Ordinance Update Committee Work Session Minutes March 10, 2010 Paae 3of5 Plann Teague wondered if a sketch plan review meeting is requi Id it take th NN,, lace. of the neighborhood meeting? Members acknowledged that was a fair ques n and a possibility. Chair Fischer said as he understands. a sketch plan revie eeting" that only non- binding "comments" from stAff, commission and residents ould be taken -there would be no vote. M% ber °Forrest( noted the sketch plan view meeting would be just that, a meeting; not a public hearing. The discussion contin d with Committee Members going back and forth ,on if a sketch plan review mee should be mandatory or elective. Members felt that if a sketch plan review mee' is mandatory it should be mandatory for only a PUD /Rezoning with notifica n. required. (Members said the goal of the Sketch Plan Review is to- achieve a b tter product and not add confusion to the process. It was acknowledged a time lin f thefnnotice or of the sketch plan review, would need to be established and adhe drto. Action Committee Members recommended th� t a Sketch Plan Review meeting be a requirement of a PUD, and/or Rezoning �` d formal notification should be given. A Sketch PlarfIReview meeting wokx1d be :a voluntary option for all other applications°." Chair Fischer 9 id he would like to focus on the Zestiion. raised by Planner Teague if the "re should be a minimum lot/parcel stipulated for a PUD. After discussi ,di, Committee Members suggested that sta strike the minimum size . requirent. Its also stressed that the R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District, R -2, and PRD 1 sidential Zoning Districts would not be considered at this time for PUD signation. Topic: Date Introduced: Date of Discussion: Introduction Building Height, February 24, 2010 March 10, 2010 Planner Teague briefed the Commission reminding them that building height must be brought into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Continuing Planner Teague. said there are options to achieve compliance. .1. Establish an overlay district and 2. Write regulations for each area described in the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Ordinance Update Committee work Session Minutes March 10, 2010 Page 4 of 5 Planner Teague reported that the City Attorney has advised that the City must have the same standards within each zoning district. Cities cannot require different standards within the same zoning district. Planner Teague reminded the Committee that the Comprehensive Plan prescribes different height maximums on properties that are"zoned: the same, adding the City Attorney has . recommended establi'shing'height'overlay districts across the City for all commercial, industrial, and higher density residential land use. Planner Teague stated that language within the draft 'Comprehensive Plan recommended by the Plan ning'`Commission on how to achieve "podium height" was removed from the Plan by the City Council. Planner Teague stated he believes podium height could,still be achieved by requiring setbacks that equal building height. Additionally, a provision could be written in to the ordinance to encourage buildings to be brought up to the street through a variance, similar to existing language in the PCD District. Discussion The Committee discussed that the reason "podium height" was suggested was to encourage a more pedestrian friendly streetscape by allowing buildings to come to the curb but'stepping them back as the building(s) got higher. The following issues were identified in addressing building height and the proposed "Height Overlay" map: O Should "podium height" even be established if buildings are prohibited from being built up to the street? ® Would adding podium height in a PUD be a tool in achieving flexibility? Noting there are areas within the City where a building "up to the street" makes sense and is the character of the area (50th & France). ® It would be difficult to prove hardship for a variance in pulling the building up to the street. • Maintain consistency in building heights in "study areas" (Wooddale/ Valley View Road and -West -54h- street) even if the "area" contains different "zones" (PCD -4). Heights should be increased to the heights prescribed for those "areas ". • Instead of a "Height Overlay District" would it be better to create a' "Pedestrian Overlay District ". • Could what's in the Comp Plan be.translated into an overlay:district? The discussion continued on the discrepancy between the Ordinance,and,the Comprehensive Plan and if one violates the other, pointing out they can't be at odds Committee Members felt that more time is needed to digest the "Height',: Overlay District" map and its. relationship to.the Ordinance. The goal is to have Zoning Ordinance Update Committee work Session Minutes March 10, 2010 Page 5 of 5 the Ordinance be consistent with the Comprehensive. Plan and achieving that is the issue. Chair Fischer-asked Planner Teague the timing on compliance. Planner Teague responded that Ordinance must be brought into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan within nine months after.Met Council approval. Planner Tead`ue explained that the Met Council is aware.that the City is in the process of addressing the height issue in an attempt to'bring the. Ordinance into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Action Continue Discussion The Commnittee.directed Planner Teague to take another look at the "Height Over Map, and replace the 1 -story districts, which are existing sites zoned PCD-4 and only ahows automobile service centers, to match the height regulation of adjacent parcels'. The Comprehensive Plan suggests maximum heights in these areas; and , increasing these areas would be consistent. III. ADJOURNMENT: The work session adjourned at 9:00 PM Submitted. by: .hackie xoogenakker r :MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, March 24,2010i 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEM S PRESENT: Chair Milo` ischer, Jeff Carpenter, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Kevin, Staunton, ibWl Schroeder, Steve Brown, Floyd Grabiet. Arlene Forrest and Karwehn K STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague, Kris Aaker a Jackie Hoogerad er I. APPROVAL OF THE Ml T Commissioner Brown moved ap • val o �ie February 24, 2010, Planning Commission meeting minutes Commission Schroeder seconded the motion. All.voted aye; motion carrie Commissioner Bro , -moved approval of the March 2010, Zoning Ordinance Update Commi . meeting minutes with an addition to ers Present. Commission067arpenter seconded the motion. All voted a motion carried. OLD BUSINESS: Zoning Ordinance Update — Ordinance Amendment — Building Height Planner Presentation Planner Teague referred to the attached Ordinance amendment thatwould bring the City's Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague explained that the Ordinance would establish a Building Height Overlay District over the City's entire commercial, industrial and high density residential zoning districts, and would establish height regulations as prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague pointed out that the map on page A10 highlights the areas where a height change is required by the Comprehensive Plan. The overlay district is proposed because cities cannot require different height standards within the same zoning district. The Comprehensive Plan requires different heights within the same zoning districts. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010 Page 2 of 8 Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the ordinance subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. Discussion Commissioner Scherer said she remembers height was an important issue during the discussions leading up to the adoption of the. Comprehensive Plan adding that the Commission needs to ensure during this re -write process that building height is restricted as`adopted. Commissioners :acknowledged those discussions ; however they pointed out that in a number of Edina's neighborhood character districts zoning can be different parcel by parcel (specifically PCD -4) and building height in a character district should be uniform or the option of uniforminity should be permitted. This is particularly important for redevelopment. It was also noted during the Comp Plan re -write and discussions on "character districts" that it was never-suggested that. because a property had a specific. zoning designation (PCD74) the height of a building on that parcel would be-limited to 1 -story when properties around it were allowed to be 2- stories, not to exceed 4- stories. Commissioners also noted that during the discussion phase of the Comprehensive, Plan podium height was mentioned to allow building height at the street to be 2- stories with the option of going taller if the building were to be stepped back; however, how to achieve podium height was left out of the Plan. This step back or podium height would encourage development of a more pedestrian friendly environment. Commissioner Forrest noted difficulty may lie in the definition of story. She pointed out in the Comprehensive Plan one "story" is considered 12-feet, adding that definition would limit= °store front", scenarios similar to 50th and France, and it could also impact service stations with -bays. The proposed overlay district map would at least allow.2- stories; which for a service station with bays makes more sense. Chair. Fischer agreed. He pointed out garage bays are usually over 12-feet which would create anon- conforming situation for some of the City's service stations if left as is. Commissioner Risser agreed and said even'if the. use of a PCD-4 zoned parcel remains the same, there may be unique design options where flexibility-on building height makes sense, pointing out in reality the functionality of buildings change. Chair Fischer acknowledged everyone has their own perception; however, the Comprehensive Plan is a guide and guidance is needed for vision. Chair Fischer pointed out the Comprehensive Plan and proposed'` building height overlay district map refers to areas. Continuing, Chair Fischer said people should also remember when heights are "called -out" it doesn't mean a building has to be built at that height, it means a building can be built up to that;,height, and in all instances required setbacks are also a factor. Planner- Teague. agreed, adding if anyone is worried about the potential for a building being too tall in reality that Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010 Page 3 of 8 can't happen. As mentioned by Chair.Fischer building height is determined by setbacks and floor area ratios. The discussion ensued on:the potential for redevelopment in specific areas, (Cahill & W;701h St, Valley View/Wooddale) and how the building height overlay, district map and ordinance mesh as required by Met Council. Commissioner Staunton said in his opinion this amendment needs to move forward to the Council and adopted to accomplish compliance as required by Met Council. Commissioner Grabiel agreed. Continuing; Commissioner Staunton said his caution is ensuring that if certain areas in Edina are _redeveloped (Southdale) more thought should be given to these areas. Commissioner Staunton said it is very important to achieve a good pedestrian flow in the .City's commercial areas, reiterating further study may be needed. Chair Fischer agreed and asked Planner Teague how the text changes read. " Planner Teague said the ordinance as proposed takes out all height regulations . within each individual district and refers to the building height overlay district map as ordinance 850.22. The ordinance text would also match the key found on the building height overlay district map. A brief discussion ensued with regard to ordinance language that refers to.25% of frontage with some Commissioners feeling there was ambiguity in the 25% reference. It was also pointed out that the term "between .intersections" in .. actuality may be different in. some. residential areas of the City and in differing zoning districts. It was suggested that.some ordinance language may need to be "cleaned up" during the re -write process. Chair Fischer said he understands the comments on street frontage, etc; however, at this time the focus should remain on building height.. Chair Fischer said he would add the reference to the 25% rule and "between intersections to the "bucket list ". Commissioner Risser questioned -if the ordinance and overlay map should be so specific on building height instead of allowing a range of building. heights. She pointed out with if a building is constructed with shorter ceilings a-144 foot building could be 14- stories, not 12 as dictated. Chair Fischer pointed out . building heights were determined by the City Council and probably can't be changed. Planner Teague agreed, adding if a building exceeds 12- stories in an area designated as 12- stories the Comprehensive Plan would need to be amended. Chair Fischer said in his opinion it would be worthwhile to suggest to the City Council -that they take another lookat building height; especially in the areas that could see future redevelopment. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010 Page 4of8 Public Comment John Bohan, 800 Coventry, told the Commission he believes the podium height (2 -story at the street level) concept resulted from conversations with, merchants and residents in the Cahill and West 70th Street neighborhood. Mr., Bohan also referred to the draft building height overlay district as`it relates to Centennial . Lakes, HOD -4, pointing out the map indicates 4- stories;, however, the .Coventry at Centennial Lakes is only 2- stories. Chair Fischer said` #fie recalled'the discussion on Centennial Lakes and asked Planner Teague if the reasoning behind the 4- stories is that sites with a similar zoning designation must be treated equally. Planner Teague responded that is correct. Continuing, Planner Teague pointed out that currently there is no height limit in the Centennial Lakes area. The proposed ordinance would reduce height in this area possibly more than any other in the City. Action Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend adoption. of an Ordinance, amending the Zoning Ordinance to add'a' Building Height Overlay District, pages Al -A6, including the most recent appendix A, and the March 24, 2010 memo with the understanding that this amendment imports height wherever it was dictated in the Comprehensive Plan by importing it into the height overlay district, and where the Comprehensive Plan was silent the current zoning restrictions regarding height would be retained. Commissioner Brown seconded, the motion." Ayes; Carpenter, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Brown Grabiel, Forrest, Fischer. Nay; Schroeder. Motion carried 8 -1 Discussion `Manned Unit Development Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the m _ 'ion the PUD topic has been separated into four separate elements: 1).Pu �e and Intent (goals) 2) Applicability /Criteria; 3) Process] - oce res; and 4) Rules /Standards. Planner Teague said the t , is this evening ik ules %Standards. Planner Teague said what has been dis. ssed up to this point �id potential language that could be used as the Rulesa�andards section. Planne geague reminded the Commission at th ast meetings discussion the twA acre minimum requirement was removed; ' a sketch plan is required for a PU�Dre oning. A public meeting is r fired and residents within 1,000 feet wnotified; and the v MINNESOTA STATUTES 2009 462.357 X462.357 ®)i FICA. CONTROLS: ZD) G ORDINANCE. Subdivision 1: Authority 'fo r zoning. For the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals, and.general welfare a municipality may by. ordinance regulate on the earth's surface, in the air space above: the surface, and in subsurface areas, the location, height, width, bulk, type of foundation, number of stories, size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lot which may be occupied, the size ,of yards :and other open spaces, the density and distribution of population, the uses of buildings and structures for' trade, ihdustry, residence, recreation, public activities, or other purposes, and the use of land for trade, industry, residence; recreation, agriculture, forestry, soil conservation, water supply conservation, conservation of shorelands, as defined in sections 103F.201 to 103F.221, access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems as defined in section 216C.06, flood control or other purposes, and may establish standards aid procedures regulating such uses. To accomplish these purposes, official controls may include provision for purchase of development rights by the governing body in the form of conservation easements under chapter 84C in areas where the governing body considers preservation desirable and the transfer of development rights from those areas to areas the governing body considers more appropriate for development. No regulation may prohibit earth sheltered construction as defined in section 216C.06, subdivision 14, relocated residential buildings, or manufactured homes built in conformance with sections 327.3.1 to 327.35 that comply with all other zoning ordinances promulgated pursuant to this section. Tlne, regulations may divide the surface, above surface, and subsurface areas of the municipality into districts or zones of suitable numbers, shape, and area. /Tho regulations`sh`all be unifomn _for - each- class -or- Enid -of buir ldinas,_structures; or band -and-for eacli-`cl ss or kind of use"throu2liout suchdistrict °L?ut- the - regulations -in- one- discrret may- differ from thiise a iioother- districts? The ordinance embodying these regulationsshall be knownasthe.zoning ordinance andshall consist of text and maps. A city may by ordinance extend the application of its zoning regulations to unincorporated territory located within two miles of- its limits in any direction, but not in a county or town which has adopted zoning regulations; provided that where two or more noncontiguous municipalities have boundaries less than four miles apart, each is authorized to control the zoning of land on its side of a line equidistant between the two noncontiguous municipalities unless a town or county in the affected'area has adopted zoning regulations. Any city may thereafter enforce such regulations in the area to the same extent as if such property were situated within its corporate limits, until the county or town board adopts a comprehensive zoning regulation which includes the area. Subd. la. Certain zoni<nng ordinances. A municipality trust not enact, amend;, or enforce a zoning ordinance that has'the effect of altering the existing density, lot -size requirements, or manufactured home setback requirements in any manufactured home park'constructed before Copyright 0 2009 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota All Rights Reserved. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. 111.1. 1. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® F� 0 Action Discussion Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Set Hearing Date (7/2012010) Rezoning — The Waters Final Development Plan and Final ACTION REQUESTED: Set the hearing date for July 20, 2010. See attached Planning Commission report, proponent materials and correspondence. 4 � w9tN�1r'L ow e ry � .by • f� o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 30, 2010 2010- 001.10b Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Development of the south parking lot and vacant wooded portion of Colonial Church, located at 6200 Colonial Way. The specific request is to build a 3 -story, 139 -unit senior convalescent home for the Waters Senior Living of Edina, on behalf of the Colonial Church of Edina. (See project location on pages Al —A3; and the applicant narrative and detailed plans on pages A6 —A67, and the attached development plan book.) The applicant, has already received the following: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Residential. The High Density designation would allow the senior convalescent home use. (See page A5.) 2. A Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5. The PRD -5 District only allows rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. 3. A Preliminary Development Plan. (See page A68 —A71.) 4. A Preliminary Plat. (See page A72.) (See Planning Commission & City Council minutes on pages Al50— Al65.) The applicant is now requesting the following: 1. Final Development Plan. 2. Final Rezoning. 3. Final Plat. The applicant has spent the last several months since the February 16, 2010 Preliminary Rezoning and Plan approval and the Comprehensive Plan amendment, meeting with residents and revising the plans in an attempt to address concerns of residents within the area, and concerns raised by the Planning Commission and City Council during the approval process. (See pages A14 A20, of the applicant's narrative regarding the meetings that were held with neighbors in the area.) The plan revisions include the following: • The structure has been reduced from four to three stories. • A re- design of the roof. • The number of units was reduced from 150 to 139. • The front building fagade has been modified to add more architectural features. • Provision of additional landscaping in Countryside Park and in the Crosstown Highway 62 right -of -way. The Edina Zoning Ordinance defines "Convalescent Home" as follows: "A building or group of buildings licensed by the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare for the care of children, the aged or infirm, or a place of rest and care for those suffering physical or mental disorders. Hospitals, clinics, maternity care homes, and other buildings or parts of buildings containing surgical equipment are not included." The proposed building and facility is designed for the care of the aged, and would be licensed by the State. Therefore, the proposal would meet the City's definition of a Convalescent Home. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Countryside Park; zoned R -1 Single - Dwelling Unit District and guided Public /Semi - Public. Easterly: Edina Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single - Dwelling Unit District and guided Low - Density Residential. Southerly: Crosstown Highway. Westerly: Nine -mile Village Townhomes; zoned and guided medium density housing. 2 Existing Site Features The subject property is 6.27 acres in size contains a parking lot for the Colonial Church with mature trees. (See pages A2 —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: High Density Residential — Pending Met Council Approval. Zoning: R -1, Single - Dwelling District Parking The applicant has demonstrated that enough parking would be provided for both the existing Colonial Church and the senior convalescent home. For the church, the required parking spaces must be one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly. The maximum capacity of the sanctuary in the church is 857 people, based on a ratio of 22 inches per person; therefore, 286 spaces are required. The site plan demonstrates 341 parking spaces available for the church. (See page A67.) The north lot contains 222 spaces, the west lot 20 spaces, and the east lot contains 99. spaces. The east lot was previously owned by Colonial Church, but dedicated to the City of Edina when the church was built back in 1978. Colonial Church and the City entered into a "Parking Lot Agreement" that allows the church to use the lot for their parking requirements. For the housing component, the required parking is one space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. Based on 169 resident maximum, 30 employees, one vehicle and one bus, 76 spaces are required. The site plan shows that there would be 73 surface stalls and 80 enclosed stalls. Site Circulation Access to the site would be from two entrance /exits from Colonial Way. There would be surface parking in front of the building, with the loading area behind the building facing crosstown highway. A circular pick -up and drop off area would be located in front of the building. Access to the underground garage would be from the front of the building on the west side. (See pages A58 and A62.) The proposal would meet all minimum drive -aisle width standards. Walking paths are proposed around the site. (See pages A62 and A75a.) The paths would provide connections to the church to the northwest, and to Countryside Park. (See page A75a and A76.) 3 The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable. Landscaping To accommodate the new building, 334 trees and shrubs would have to be removed. (See attached tree inventory and removal plan on pages A59 —A60.) Base on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 54 over story trees and a full compliment of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing an extensive landscape plan that includes 117 over story trees that would remain, and planting back 346 over story trees and 517 understory trees and shrubs. (See plan on page A61.) Included in these calculations are 14 Black Hills Spruce to be planted in Countryside Park, and 19 Black Hills Spruce to be planted in the Crosstown Highway right - of -way to provide additional screening. The applicant has gone above and beyond the city's landscaping requirements. Environmental Review Based on concern in the neighborhood regarding environmental impacts on the subject property, the applicant hired Acorn Environmental Consultants to perform a plant and animal survey for the site. The report is attached on pages A31 —A57.) Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A73a —A73d. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City's review authority over the grading of the site. The fire department reviewed the proposed plans and offers comments on page A73. Building /Building Material The new building would be designed to fit in, or match with the Colonial Church campus. The new building would be made of cement board siding and asphalt shingles. (See renderings and building elevations on pages A22— A28.) The applicant will have a materials board for the Planning Commission to review at the meeting. Park Dedication Per Minnesota State Statute 462.353, Subd. 4(a) and Section 810.13 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate land for public use as parks, playgrounds, recreation facilities, trails, or public open space, in an amount equal to the subdivision's proportional share of the City park system. Per Section 810.13. Subd. 5 of the City Code, the presumptive cash fee for subdivision of land is $5,000 per dwelling unit to satisfy the City's park dedication requirement. The City may also require a land dedication if necessary. The City's park director recommends that a 10 -foot trail easement be dedicated along the south side of Olinger Boulevard for a possible future regional trail. (See pages A75.) The total presumptive park dedication cost would be $695,000 with no land dedication. As such, the value of the 10 -foot trail easement would be taken from the $695,000 dedication amount. The developer may request a deviation from the presumptive requirements based upon the anticipated impact of that particular subdivision. The request must be made to the City Council as part of their review of the final plat approval. The applicant has requested that the City of Edina waive the park dedication fee. (See pages A13— A13b.) They have referenced projects where no park dedication was required. (See page A13 of the applicant narrative.) While it is true that no park dedication was required for the Ebenezer Society or the Gramercy, however, the City of Edina did not waive the fee. In both cases the property was not being subdivided, therefore, the City has no ability to require park dedication. Only when property is subdivided, can cities collect park dedication fees. It does seem reasonable to reduce the park dedication fees in this instance given the impact that a convalescent home would have on the park. However, the waiver of the fee would be a decision of the City Council. Should the fee be required, it would paid prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars or subdivision approval for recording with Hennepin County. The exception is that in the case of multiple - family residential developments where the site plan review occurs after the time of final plat approval, the fee would be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. Density From a unit count perspective, the proposed density of 22 units per acre would be a higher density than the adjacent Nine -Mile Village (11 units /acre) to the west. However, the proposed use and zoning would be for a senior assisted living facility only, which would not generate the amount of traffic than would be generated from a true high density market rate housing facility. Access to the facility would be off Tracy Avenue, and Olinger Boulevard, both of which are defined as collector roadways. (See functional classification map on page A78.) Affordable Housing The applicant has indicated a willingness to provide 20% of the dwelling units as affordable housing. That option can be discussed if the project receives approval. The applicant would come back the City Council at a later date to discuss the specifics of how affordable housing could be achieved. Final Plat The applicant is also requesting a re -plat of the lot to create a separate lot for the senior housing facility. (See the plat on page A72a.) The subdivision would meet all minimum lot standards and subdivision requirements. GI Compliance Table City Standard (PRD -5) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — Colonial Way 43 feet 74 feet Side — West 48 feet 58 feet Side — East 35 feet 76 feet Front — Highway 62 35 feet 40 feet Parking Lot Setbacks Front 20 feet 20 feet Side — East 10 feet 50+ feet Side — West 10 feet 50+ feet Proximity to R -1 District 110 feet 344 feet Building Height No maximum requirement 43 feet Building Coverage 35% 33% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 120% 90% Parking Stalls Church Spaces equal in number to one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly (Max. Capacity is 857 people = 286 spaces required) 341 spaces Senior Housing One space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity o4f the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management (169 residents, 30 employees, one vehicle, 153 spaces total (80 enclosed and 73 one bus = 76 spaces required.) surface) Parking Stall Size .8.5' x 18' 9'x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Landscaping 54 over story trees and a full 117 over story trees would remain & compliment of under story shrubs. 346 over story trees planted. 517 understory trees and shrubs would be planted. Of the over story trees, 33 would be planted in the Crosstown right -of -way and Countryside Park to provide additional screening. PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Are the proposed Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. As determined at the time of approval of the Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning; the use would be compatible with the higher density residential use to the west, Countryside Park to the north, Crosstown Highway to the south, and the fire station to the east. (See land uses on pages A2 and A3.) The park, church, and fire station would buffer the proposed use from the nearest single - family homes. The closest single - family home would be 344 feet away. (See page A74.) The site is located adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62 at the "edge" of this neighborhood. Higher density housing is often found adjacent to major roadways like the Crosstown Highway. (See Land Use Plan from the Comprehensive Plan on page A5.) Higher density residential developments provide a buffer to these roadways and potentially block noise. Access to the facility would be off Tracy Avenue; and Olinger Boulevard, both of which are defined as collector roadways. (See functional classification map on page A78.) Access to the site would not be through any local streets. This site would be advantages for the residents of this facility because of the emergency services offered from the fire station next door. Concern has been raised in regard to the size and scale of the building in this neighborhood. The applicant has attempted to address these concerns by reducing the height of the building from four to three stories; the roof has been re- designed; the number of units has been reduced from 150 to 139; the front building fagade has been modified to add more architectural features; and additional trees have been added for screening. The building would meet all required setbacks from R -1 zoned property, which is 110 feet. (See page A74.) The building would be 344 feet from the nearest R -1 property, and buffered by Colonial Church, Countryside Park and the fire station. (See page A74.) The circumstance of a three -story or even four story building being located near R -1 zoning property in Edina is not uncommon. Staff conducted an inventory of existing circumstance where three and four story buildings have been constructed adjacent to R -1 properties. (See pages A117— A134.) As noted there are several similar building located much closer than 344 feet. Several are also located directly adjacent to R -1 property without any buffer. The following table these areas: 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) C. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) 9 Zoning Distance to R- 1 Stories Building Length of Apt. Grandview PSR -4 50'& 220' 3 & 4 450' York Place Apts. PCD -3 100' 4 300' Vernon Terrace PRD -3 95' 35' to R -2 6 510' Grammerc PRD-4 130' 4 330' 51't & Halifax PRD-4 30' & 35' 3 & 4 270' Southdale Office POD 280' 6 650' Cornelia Place Apts. PRD -4 700' 4 525' Brookside Apts. PRD -3 140' 3 250' 2 buildings) Apts on Eden Prairie Rd. PRD -3 85' 3 230 -250' 3 buildings) Windwood A is PRD -3 120' 3 330'& 200' Sunrise PRD-4 238' 1 3 210' Proposed Waters PRD -5 344'& 810' 1 3 580' 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) C. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) 9 d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure - capacity through wise land use. (Comprehensive Plan Section 5.4 — Housing Goals.) g. Facilitate the development of new housing and recreation facilities that accommodate the special needs of aging city residents. (Comprehensive Plan Section 4.4 — Land Use Goals.) h. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. (Comprehensive Plan Section 4.4 — Land Use Goals.) The proposed housing fits Edina's demographics. According to the 2000 census, 22.7% of Edina's population is age 65 or older. Many of these residents continue to live in single - family homes. The proposed housing development would offer an opportunity for these residents to move out of their single - family home and remain in Edina, resulting in an opportunity for a young family to move into the vacated single - family residential home. 3. The existing roadways would support the project. RLK Incorporated conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both RLK and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic studies on pages A79— A112.) The study was based on a 150 unit building. The Edina Transportation Commission met on January 21, 2010, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See the minutes on pages A115— A116.) During the previous review by -the Planning Commission. A condition was added that the traffic study be recalculated to take in account traffic counts when Edina Schools were in session. That re- calculation was done prior to City Council review and is attached on pages A79 —A84.) The result of the new study concluded that there would be no change to the projected level of service on the roadways. (See page A82 of the study.) 10 4. If affordable housing is included within the project, the units could help the city to achieve its established goal with the Met Council of providing 212 additional affordable housing units by the year 2030. Affordable housing, and how to achieve it would be considered by the City Council, if the project is approved. Is the PRD -5 Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PRD -5 is appropriate for the site. This district is exclusive for rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. These uses would be appropriate for this site given the surrounding land uses, including the Nine Mile Village townhomes to the west, Countryside Park to the north, Crosstown Highway to the south, and the fire station to the east. A "convalescent home" is defined as follows: "A building or group of buildings licensed by the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare for the care of children, the aged or infirm, or a place of rest and care for those suffering physical or mental disorders. Hospitals, clinics, maternity care homes, and other buildings or parts. of buildings containing surgical equipment are not included." The proposed building and facility is designed for the care of the aged, and would be licensed by the State. Therefore, the proposal would meet the City's definition of a Convalescent Home. In the future, if the property owner wished to propose a different type, of housing on the site, such as an "any age" facility, a rezoning of the property would be required subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. Staff Recommendation Final Rezoning & Final Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from R -1, Single - Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat for the Waters senior living development at 6200 Colonial Way. Approval is subject to the following findings: The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the west. 2. The project would be buffered from the single - family residential area by the multiple - family housing to the west, Colonial Church and Countryside 11 Park to the north, the fire station to the east, and Crosstown Highway 62 to the south. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 4. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. C. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, 'and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure - capacity through wise land use. g. Facilitate the development of new housing and recreation facilities that accommodate the special needs of aging city residents. h. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 12 Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site Plan date stamped May 28, 2010. • Grading Plan date stamped May 28, 2010. • Landscape Plan date stamped May 28, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped May 28, 2010. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. The following must be submitted to the City before a building permit it is issued: a. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. b. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated June 25, 2010. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated June 15, 2010. 6. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 7. Implementation of the applicant's Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM), as submitted. 8. Cross - easements must be established over the exterior parking lot of the senior housing project, to allow the church access to those spaces. 9. The project shall include 20% of the units for affordable housing. The detail of how that may be accomplished would be determined at a later date, subject to approval of the City Council. 13 Final Plat Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Plat for the Waters senior living development at 6200 Colonial Way to create a separate lot for the senior housing facility. Approval of the Final Plat is subject to the following conditions: 1. Per Section 810.13. Subd. 5 of the City Code, the presumptive cash fee in lieu of land dedication is $5,000 per dwelling unit ($695,000 total for 139 units) to satisfy the City's park dedication requirement. In addition a 10- foot trail easement must be dedicated along the south side of Olinger Boulevard for a possible future regional trail. The value of the 10 -foot trail easement would be reduced from the total $695,000 dedication amount. Deadline for a city decision: September 21, 2010 14 '� N City of Edina 6071606/ W64 6006 6604 5601 5517; '5010 5960 6107 Logond Houw kumker LShelc N 2101 y 6070 6000 6001 6017 BOf] 6103 Street Nam¢ Labels 6071 6017 a0/S 6005 I0t6 6100 6101 City Limit. I' 1 6 10536!3 Ml7 6071 361 110 6r00 BODr T 6010 - 6103 1 ^l Craeke 0 lJlk6 Nemec 166 6T04 6101 6106 all K t1 36!65670 611 16665604 6i T? 6106 6i00 6100 6116 C Lakes 6t05 F /R5 6104 6177 Park. 6170 _ 610D F104 6fq 6141 6117 Parcel. 30 5177611 36?f T7 X06 ON 6r79 6106 117 2009 Aen01 Photo �e Y�.1 Ljke -61 r7 24 2 an 391 1661!604 6666 5700 576( 5700 6716 6171 }718177 57146710 _ 6721 n 6706 6704 tn6 - Gm7 676s ..� r 6761 67a0 112 _ 71 6201 d7a1 at _ 6108 - Kf �• 6776 - 6712 6]M 6276 2,62 6711 67T "1166 - 6717 6717 t _ 6177..6704'770 21 9710 G960;� G7Je Ic;7e X40 6701 6766 6279:. 7.. E7sf - J �(JDO /J -' :; 750 .6Yet 6277 f: J7 CZ.6 C ]y7e 7E 67IL� J E7tC f'5: � 21)77: . (. 1Z'1�r ( _. 6903 6901 Q0y 6771 6Jm .r W52 006 6101 6.76D fJiF 6971 677 67f7 GJ2y e f 7008 fJ05 6708' (300 _ 20 W7J 672/ 6•.W W00 76'0 600 6JOs -T 5G0! 56W5 `� rn` �. 561( � 6501 J � � s 6309 Nsvads-rAC916 Corµe(ClrO"R Lli?.6 24 �' T yrJ y:D9 lT� 'A. --1 g - Jti PID: 0511621210005 i E) 1 q ' 6200 Colonial Way r Edina, MN 55436 • l�YUUVai.'�r� � 1110A'� Fail City of Edina 6196 Loge nd Ha.- Number Labels 6117 Strect Name L.cbels 7f dW9 sw S628 N76 5616 3617 5696 5696 590:1 -ir, y.ar .,:ry b'00 ./ City Limits 61.1 ti, crcekc ♦ ❑Lake Names Lakes Park* _ b 1 El Portals x # 2099 Ae rlal Photo _ i70f r cia 6799 .t rsZ. t..iJ [ 6]91 739 F. - 7• 7t z � .Y •1 �1� PTD: 0511621210005 6200 Colonial Way Edina, MN 55436 r l7Att,Jtrcn�.tir: Ili lilt Fail city ®f Edam f� P% ®: 0511621210005 �! .. 6200 Colonial Way Edina, MN 55436 1QL L Land -1 Gry Umlts Gnats C, L.Ims PD 4a fi Z=Inv f ®us wa t .rnm ram D-1 ❑ tlDD-017IIC 0s_Srrat O!>rGl 90D-1177C D— r, Diary) rr -r y.�T.« CDO -0If1v�I Dao►ssaiD�al KD-I ~- C.craGD -f KD- 71Ptud Dw�a pC — ® K� IPL -..dD r�o5r1) ra Ina.d aa.e.yan>.e�l IW.I Irb..0 Ofb DlaCl 1VD- 71Plnd Dllb D'dl�1 ®}-j MA I n.ad AC'J Dm t rAna Ird,d aver D» rno-7lre.,d o�yne n+oeal PAD-+IrGa tN�Der�l 8 rAF7lrb +v rso +IPt+.d AsSr Dty.�l A- 11SuPd �S1AW Adlpnn�pxS, Deq ADO IAA tic 5--M aE rl Pmnsls f• of Edina 7 PID: ®51162121®® ®5 [r, Q •.-.. a 6200 Colonial WaYvl, �, r Edina, MN 55436 AL ii , t s% lMd dty Limits rJ.Rb L7 (Dkn PDrkr Zrninp �!O IR.I. —!•b P." D'a DDDdtwI DsSpet Db 9 DDDdD.I.d Doc3p.-3a Ob 4 DD04 pl -0—t" as Ok.-I MD•1 ltbn.0 D..r DG»CI XC 21 . C . DhP.DI M041'l a s— VwL4 ICON IPL�nnd C.rrC D1JI PM ltlm PDD.1 IF— WE=D'dr_I oaD•t Iwa.e Rcyen. Diar�l tRD -0It:2.d Rc�ala Dd.CI P063I —ac.—" P.-km PRDa IPS.d R.� Obr�l tRtrllPts.0 a�f.n ab,bl PsD +IPn..d sms.. D�1 M Ual a- rlD..:e D.�ru.p I—I Pnrsels Legend I \ yy 39th St LDR - Low Densely Reswentffl OR - Offi- Rezben4fl RM - Rep onfl Medcfl O LOAR - LV Density Attfchec Resipentul D -OK� ® OSP- Op- Spfcefw Pelee I tO MDR - Me dum Density Residential ®-,' MXC - Mi:etl Uce Comer PSP - PuNIUSemI- Publie I I NDR - F6ph Densly Resid-bW O CAC - Communly Acbvq Cemer ® LAM - Llmltetl ACCeec n I s J' I t L J IJ E; j '.'� 7 } NC- NNphborhootl Commercial - IntlucSriel P i r k ' 111 ED. pl G} . rya. -z. U 1"1OB 1 D _'1 R- LX i SF N "7� FOR r _ F sy CDR - _ N HDR 651h SL CD tz � 68th St N L � •� l;�•'� -I '+•III _t __ ;.�.. 1,�.�'I �i .-�.- _ J� f LLI M }R 16 -_ �9 t t LA I _ OR Z - h 7 to o IOR� n rlJ ?Ort W- 78M .St ' �- - --. � _. -� -. _ �. IV SL af Co 49 ^� Figure 4.3 City of Edina Future Land Use Platt - -1' 2008 Carnprehenelve Flan U' pda "te Data Source: URS 00 0.5 Miles A4 � P t I - A 71 A ,� THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING T H EWA T E R S OF EDINA SENIOR HIVING" Proposed Senior Housing Community on the campus of Colonial Church May 28, 2010 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Subject: The Waters Senior Living of Edina a� Dear Cary, Since the February 16`x' City Council meeting, we have been working to modify the design the Waters Senior Living of Edina senior housing community in response to the City Council's comments as well as comments received from our neighbors. Based upon these comments, we made significant changes to the building design incorporating as much -as we could without jeopardizing the financial feasibility of the senior housing community. With the revised design, we are requesting your approval of the rezoning, the Development Plan and the lot subdivision. We began the design revisions based on the comments made at the City Council meeting. In cooperation with Countryside Neighborhood, we held two neighborhood meetings on April 6t' and 8' to listen to all of the neighbors comments. At each meeting over 125 neighbors attended and many of them provided their comments. On May 20" we met with Countryside Neighborhood representatives to show them the revised design. Our neighbors asked many questions and we answered all of them. In addition to the formal meetings, we had several informal meetings and conversations with Countryside Neighborhood representatives. We believe that the revised design responds to most of their comments and concerns. r Significant design changes: Included as Exhibit A are three exterior renderings of the senior housing community from across Countryside Park, from Colonial Church and from the south. Each rendering is shown with full vegetation and without The full vegetation is a representation of how the vegetation will look when the construction is completed. Most of the senior housing community's view will be blocked by the full vegetation. At the Planning Commission and City Council meetings we will also be showing you a SketchUp fly over. The following points highlight the four areas where there are significant design modifications: • Senior housing community reduced from 4 stories to 3 stories at grade The fourth floor was completely removed reducing the overall building height by eleven feet. The building height to the peak of the main roof is 46 feet. The building height to the mid -point of the roof height is 38 feet. Because the land elevation increases by twenty feet from west to east, it is important to also take building elevations into consideration. A comparative height illustration of the senior housing community with adjacent buildings and trees is attached as Exhibit B. The elevation of the top of the fire station is approximately 905 feet with the senior housing community's roof starting at an elevation of 898 feet or seven feet below the top of the fire station. If one was to lie on the fire station's roof and look at the senior housing community, you would see approximately half way up the roof. Most of the senior housing community will be lower than the existing adjacent trees that will be preserved along the pond and Colonial Way. • Number of units reduced to 139 from 150 and fewer larger units The removal of one floor required both the number of units to be reduced along with a reduction in the number of larger units. The number of units was reduced by 11. The original submission had 61 units being larger than one bedroom. The revised design has 41 units larger than one bedroom. The overall square footage has been reduced from 200,387 to 214,967. • Front of building modified to include more architectural features At the City Council meeting it was requested that the memory support / care suites eastern end of the building (toward the fire station) be eastern end has been redesigned and looks more residential. rr 7 The front of the building has been redesigned to include two larger wings on opposite sides of the main entrance. These two wings break up the long front view of the senior housing community and adds to the architectural interest • Roof redesigned to eliminate gables and to be a complete hip roof system which also looks more residential The initial roof design was a gable roof incorporating several gables which made the building look taller. The roof has been redesigned to eliminate all of the gables and to be a hip roof. Hip roofs are very traditional and look more residential. The pitches of the hip roofs are designed to complement the look of the adjacent Colonial Church campus. Reasons to support the proposed senior housing community: There are three basic reasons to support the proposed senior housing community: the senior housing meets several of Edina's broader community needs; the location is suitable for senior housing community that will become an asset to the neighborhood; and the senior housing community will be a great place for seniors to live. • The Waters Senior Living of Edina meets significant community needs o There is a need for more senior housing community in Edina • More than 10,000 Edina residents are older than 65, the highest percentage of seniors for a city in the metropolitan area • A market study by Larsen Allen shows a demand for over 700 units of senior housing community and over 450 units of memory support. o The senior housing community provides Edina residents an opportunity to remain in their community instead of having to relocate to Eden Prairie, Hopkins or other adjacent cities to find similar senior housing opportunities. o The creation of the senior housing community also helps recycle the housing formerly occupied by the senior resident to new, younger families seeking to reside in the City of Edina o Seniors living at The Waters Senior Living of Edina will be able place without having to move as they need additional assisted li services. "`1 _-4 o Experience from The Colony at Eden Prairie shows that 75% of the future residents either currently live within three miles of the site or their children do. • The proposed senior housing community is well located and will be a good neighbor o The senior housing community is surrounded by Crosstown Freeway (south), the Edina Fire Station (east), Countryside Park (north) and Colonial Church (west). o The access to the senior housing community will be off of Colonial Way which connects to an arterial street (Tracy Avenue) and then within one block to the Crosstown Freeway. o A very tall tree berm will be preserved blocking the view of the senior housing community from the west and northwest. The Fire Station and adjacent trees will block most of the view from the east. The best view of the senior housing community will be across the 800 -foot wide Countryside Park and over the 40 -foot high trees along Colonial Way. This view is still a partially blocked view. o Two traffic studies recently provided by the Developer and the Edina Public Works Department's subsequent analysis of these studies confirm that the traffic generated by the proposed senior housing community development will have a minimal impact on the existing roadway network. The 2009 average daily traffic count provided by the City of Edina for Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way is approximately 7,730. The Transportation Impact Analysis by RLK in January of 2010 projected 437 daily trips related to the proposed Senior Housing Community. That projection was based upon 150 units which has since been reduced to 139 units so the number of daily trips will be closer to 400. The Transportation Impact Analysis also projected 32 weekday AM peak hour trips and 55 weekday PM peak hour trips. A vast majority of the daily trips occur during non -peak hours. o The post- development parking requirements of the senior he;4001% community and Colonial Church combined will be exceed ■ Parking Requirements • Colonial Church �= r Z 9 0 Maximum seating capacity of 857 req s 286 spaces f� , �y Mile • Senior Housing Community 0 169 bedrooms requires 43 spaces 0 30 peak staffing requires 30 spaces 0 2 vehicles requires 2 spaces • Total parking requirement of 361 spaces ■ Parking Available • Colonial Church has 341 spaces • Senior Housing Community 0 90 garage stalls o 73 surface parking o 163 total spaces • Total Parking available of 504 spaces ■ Available parking exceeds the parking requirement by 143 spaces o The 70 -foot high trees along Nine Mile Creek will be preserved with the 40 -foot high trees along Colonial Way to provide a green buffer to the senior housing community. When these trees leaf out each spring, most of the senior housing community will not be visible through the trees. o There will be no exterior flood lights illuminating the building. Rather, all parking lot lights will be shielded and focused toward the ground. Sidewalk lighting will also be focused toward the ground. o The senior housing community development's site design will mitigate water resource impact. The development will obtain approvals and permits from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and will incorporate a water retention pond, rain gardens, and a water detention storage plan for a 100 year storm event. The ground floor parking level of the senior housing community will be located above the 100 -year flood elevation and will have no impact on the ground water table levels or area basement flooding during heavy rain falls. r•� A flora and fauna study was commissioned to be sure that no impact on rare or endangered species. RLK completed their study (Exhibit C) and found no rare or endangered species of flora or faun o The design of the senior housing community by HG Colonial Church, will complement each other and be winning architecture. ,10 • The Waters Senior housing community of Edina, a great place for Edina seniors to live o The Waters Senior Living of Edina is being designed to be the finest senior housing community in Edina with extensive communal areas, state of the art wellness focus, larger apartments, and a design complementary to Colonial Church. o The cost to incorporate the extensive communal areas — wellness areas, community rooms, bistro, library, and other common areas need to be spread over 139 units to be economically feasible. As the number of units is reduced, these amenities will be eliminated and the character of the senior housing community will diminish. o The senior housing community provides 24 -hour/ seven days a week on site professional nursing services that are tailored to meet each seniors needs. At least quarterly, professional nursing staff will meet with every senior resident via a wellness screen to determine if the individualized service plan should be modified. These higher levels of nursing costs need to be spread over more units to keep the costs to the seniors as reasonable as possible. o Similar new construction, high amenity, high quality senior housing community in the metropolitan area is also sized to be economically feasible. • Colony at Eden Prairie — 142 units plus 25 beds of Transitional Care • Summit Place in Eden Prairie — 265 units • St Therese in Hopkins — 313 units • Castle Ridge / Broadmoor by Presbyterian Homes — proposed to be 321 units in Eden Prairie (approved by the City Council) • Wayzata Bay Redevelopment by Presbyterian Homes — 247 senior housing community units • Waverly Gardens by Presbyterian Homes in North Oaks — 233 senior housing community units • Trillium Woods in Plymouth proposed to be 209 units • Centennial House by Ecumen in Apple Valley —148 units • Highview Hills by Walker Methodist in Lakeville —155 units • Proposed senior housing community by The Goodman Group in Chaska —150 units • The to be constructed senior housing community by The Waters Senior Living in Minneapolis is part of a senior housing community C complex consisting of a 225 bed nursing home and a to be built 77 unit assisted living community. o The financial forecasts of the new senior housing community are based upon current rents and expenses from the Colony at Eden Prairie and thereby are realistic and financially viable. Zoning related items vet to be approved by The City of Edina In February, the City Council approved the modification of the Comprehensive Plan to allow for the proposed senior housing community. There remains three basic actions for the senior housing community to proceed: a rezoning, a Development Plan and a lot sub division. • Rezoning to Planned Resident District 5 — Rest Homes, Convalescent Homes and Nursing Homes • This type of zoning is the best suited for senior housing communities which include assisted living, memory support and care suites. The entire building will be registered-for housing with services. • NO variances requested • The following zoning requirements are complied with or exceeded — per f o� a Edina Planning report ■ Building and parking lot set backs are larger than the zoning standards ■ Proximity to R -1 single family home zoning district exceeds the minimum requirement of 170 feet by two times toward Tracy Avenue and over four times toward Olinger Boulevard. ■ Building coverage of the site is less than the maximum by 33 %. ■ Building massing is less than the maximum by 30 %. ■ Parking requirements are exceeded by over 143 spaces or by 40 %. ■ Landscaping guidelines require 54 trees and a full complement of shrubs. Landscape plan greatly exceeds the minimum. The proposed landscaping plan includes over 200 trees and over 300 bushes. ■ There is no maximum building height requirement in this zoning classification This zoning allows only senior housing community. 'lie application is included as Exhibit D. kl ;t- • Development flan o This document details the senior housing community development to be sure that what is built is consistent with the City Council approvals. o As part of the Development Plan, we are requesting that this senior housing community have the Park Dedication Fee waived consistent with the waivers granted to the last two senior housing developments approved in Edina for the Ebenezer Society and Gramercy Cooperatives. The average age of the senior resident will be in the mid 80s and it is unlikely that they will avail themselves of Edina's parks. Instead, there are significant common areas for the seniors inside the building such as wellness areas, a therapy pool, community rooms, a library and other park- like areas. The cost of incorporating these park -like areas within the building greatly exceeds what the Park Dedication Fee would be. o The application is included as Exhibit E. • Property subdivision o The land is currently owned by Colonial Church of Edina. The senior housing community land needs to be subdivided. o The application is included as Exhibit F. We have worked very diligently over the last several months to listen to suggestions to modify our proposed senior housing community. We incorporated many of those comments, as well as comments from our team, to make the senior housing community better without jeopardizing its financial viability. We believe that in a few years when the senior housing community becomes the new home to many Edina seniors, it will be seen as a valuable Edina asset and a good neighbor. Thank you for your consideration of our requests. Please call Jay Jensen at 952- 358 -5110 or e -mail at jaTnsheltercorp.com with any questions. Sincerely, _ Jay en e� YocTi Waters Senior Living 1!y _ Colo�ia Church of Edina M4 Y .3 ON Cary Teaaue From: Jay Jensen <jay @sheltercorp.com> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 5:22 PM To: Cary Teague; Gordon Hughes Cc: Ted Yoch; Mike Hime; Greg Anderson; 'Holderness, Gene'; Dan O'Neill ( doneill @northlandsecurities.com); 'Donnino, Pete'; Greg Brown Tealwood E -mail; Lynn Carlson Schell; Howie Groff, 'Frank B. Bennett'; Jay Jensen; Kathleen Conlan Joyce Subject: Park dedication fee for the Waters Senior Living of Edina Attachments: park ded.doc Importance: High Cary and Gordon, Thank you for the information. I strongly believe that the Waters Senior Living of Edina should not pay Park Dedication fees of $695,000 ($5,000 per unit) for the following reasons: • Under Section 3 E in the document that you sent there is a provision for the developer to request a reduction in the Park Dedication fee based upon anticipated impact on the park system. Since the average resident will be approximately 85 years old, there will be no impact on the park system. The intent of Park Dedication fees is to assess park users for their use of the parks. Assisted living residents will not be using public parks. • The Waters Senior Living of Edina and Colonial Church have already committed park related resources as follows: o Planting evergreen trees on park property to provide a green berm on the south side of Country side Park. o Colonial Church is dedicating a 10 foot wide easement along Olinger for the proposed park trail as requested by the City of Edina. This dedication amounts to approximately 6370 square feet. o Colonial Church through an agreement allows Countryside park users to park on Colonial Church's parking lot. The senior housing will not impact the current park user use of the adjacent parking lot. • Incorporated into the design of the Waters Senior Living of Edina are many public common areas for Edina residents living in the building. The cost of creating these public spaces greatly exceeds $695,000. • While Ebenezer's recent senior development adjacent to the senior cooperative did use an existing lot, it was expended for the assisted living development. Ebenezer did not pay a Park Dedication fee. Their resident profile will be similar to The Waters of Edina resident profile. 1 Qc� Please consider incorporating into the staff report to the Planning Commission and the City Council a staff recommendation to waive the park dedication fees. We believe it has strong merit and would very much appreciate it. Please let me know if you need any further information or have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Jay Jensen Waters Senior Living 952- 358 -5110 From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:42 PM To: Jay Jensen Subject: park dedication Per my phone message, see attached.... A[3b TO: City of Edina Council Members City of Edina Planning Commission Members FROM: Colonial Church Land use Task Force DATE: June 16, 2010 Thank you for the opportunity to inform you of our actions and progress with our neighbors regarding our proposed development of senior assisted living housing on our church campus. Since our City Council meeting earlier this year the Church has held three meetings, totaling eight hours, with neighbors to listen to their concerns. These gatherings included neighbors and Edina citizens from all of the Countryside neighborhood, as well as from elsewhere; including the south side of the Crosstown near Tracy and the broader community in general. These meetings, the principal ones of which were hosted at our church property, were well attended. The larger meetings were on Tuesday, April 6th, and Thursday, April 8th, and had attendance of well over three hundred combined. Some individuals attended, and spoke at, both meetings.. At the meetings we invited the representatives of the neighbors to start the meeting and to guide portions of the meeting, as well as to make their PowerPoint presentation regarding the project. We then opened it up to receive comments, concerns and suggestions. The meetings were intended to be for us to receive, and neighbors to give us, input. We planned them with the neighbors as listening sessions. As such, we fielded questions but did not respond to them, but rather listed them for our use and potential response at a separate time after the listening sessions were completed. We continued to keep the meetings going until all who were in attendance had a chance to speak as many times as -they wished. Several weeks later we -met with the Steering Committee of the neighborhood group. This group was comprised of approximately 10 of the neighbors. In that meeting we spent time reviewing the changes that we had made to the project, based on comments that we had received. Specifically, the building was reduced from four stories to three stories, the height of the building was lowered by 11 feet, the number of units reduced to 139, the northeast profile of the building was substantially modified and the landscaping volume was significantly enhanced. It is our hope that this interactive and responsive process with the neighborhood will clear the air regarding any factual misunderstandings about our proposed development, as well as encourage many of the neighbors to believe that we are proceeding in good faith with the neighborhood by listening to, and responding to, as appropriate, their concerns, questions and suggestions. On the other hand, we continue to have a responsibility to the hundreds of Edina residents, plus the hundreds of other members of the Church who reside elsewhere, to h 1q" 6971229v1 be good stewards of our resources and our land and to try to develop a land use that will be consistent with the directions chosen by our congregation. Attached is a tabulation, by category of issue, of neighborhood questions and concerns about The Waters development and of our responsiveness and actions taken. It reflects the following: • Total questions or concerns were 137. • The number of informational questions or concerns "responded to" is 84. • Total Physical Actions Taken (includes changes in size, design, scope of project) were 24. These design changes materially reduced and altered the structure and the development both physically and financially. • Combining actions taken to design and size with answers respectfully delivered in responses (in person and in writing) to the neighborhood, we acted in one way or another on 108, or 79 %, of the 137 issues raised in our six -plus hours of meetings with the neighborhood. • The number of concerns that were either unanswerable or where we chose no action or no answer (primarily due to the nature of the comment) were 29, of which nearly half were in the 16 items we reflected as "Other." These included comments on Colonial's spirituality, our greed, our true Christian nature, how we treat our former pastors and others such as the $5,000 bond to. offset costs to the City for finding wandering stray memory care residents, seniors don't need this much space, why upgrade the kitchens (the granite countertop issue), why have kitchens at all if you have meal service, etc. Thank you for your time and attention to this important development proposal. For the Task Force: Ted Yoch Greg Anderson Mike Hime Gene Holderness Jay Swenson, Shelter Corp A(- 6971229v1 COLONIAL CHURCH — THE WATERS RESPONSIVENESS TO NEIGHBORHOOD Issue Area Total (questions/ Concerns Size / Scope / Design Actions Taken Responded To Unanswerable, Opinion No Action/ No Answer Size 19 7 7 5 Design 12 5 5 2 Use 14 1 12 1 Traffic 25 3 15 7 Infrastructure 3 0 3 0 Environmental 13 2 9 2 Viability 19 2 16 1 Process 16 3 11 2 Subtotal 121 23 78 20 Other 16 1 6 9 TOTAL 137 24 84 29 6971229vl Neighborhood Meetings Comments April 6 & 89 2010 Issues A. Size Redesign 1 Visual impact on neighbors with direct line of sight Improved 2 The visual impact upon exiting from the Crosstown Improved 3 The visual impact from passing by on the Crosstown Improved 4 Intangible feel of the neighborhood Opinion 5 Height of the building is too high Reduced 6 Number of units should be 50 to 75 7 7 Should be two stories in maximum height 8 8 Consider moving the building more to the west into the current parking lot not feasible 9 Are there Phase 2 and Phase 3 projects being contemplated? no 10 Building of this size belongs elsewhere, such as a Commercial area Opinion 11 Building is really 5 stories Mainly 3 stories 12 There are no muli -story building between France Avenue and 169 13 Consider moving the building closer to the Crosstown and get state permission to use state /county land not feasible 14 Park District is removing berms on the north side of the park 15 Consider 8 foot ceilings not feasible 16 Consider downsizing kitchens in each unit not feasible 17 Consider all one bedroom units 18 Seniors do not need this much space, it is too much for them 19 Why didn't the Church accept other proposals which had fewer units? Opinion B. Design of Building 1 The scale of the building is too large when compared to Colonial Church Opinion 2 HGA should have copied the Church design not feasible 3 The visibility of the Church will be gone Not true 4 Will lose the colonial village feeling for the campus Opinion 5 Why are the kitchens in each unit upgraded? 6 Where will we get 5 story oak tress that are in the renderings? Existing trees 7 The charm of Colonial Church will be ruined . Opinion 8 Why have kitchens when meals are part of the rental fees? 9 Will there be a full kitchen in the building to serve the residents? Yes 10 How will the building be vented? Do not want smells to impact neighbors no smells 11 What construction materials will be used? wood frame 12 Will the building start below the current parking lot level? No C. Use of Project 1 Will non - building residents be able to use the pool and wellness services? No 2 This is not a nursing home but rather a residential facility Yes 3 Shouldn't more of the services be for memory care as there is a growing need for such programs 28 memory units 4 What is the true age of anticipated residents? mid 80's 5 22 single family residents is a better use of the land 6 Is this project compatible with the Church's function? Yes 7 48 mulit- family homes would be a better use 8 Church should sign covenant not use property in this way E7 9 Will the project discriminate against Gays, Lesbians and Transgenders? No 10 Project should agree to not let trucks and garbage collection on the property after 9 PM and before 7AM Yes 11 Will grandchildren be allowed to stay over night? Yes 12 Will pets be allowed? Yes 13 Will there be drug, criminal and sex - offenders background checks? Yes 14 Not really a licensed facility, anyone can purchase services Is licensed D. Traffic Impact 1 Will there be a lot of traffic every 8 hours when there is a shift change? No 2 How many residents will drive? around 10% 3 There are no buses that ran nearby Across the street 4 Where will the residents and their visitors park? Garage & surface 5 What happens to the children's safety in the park due to additional traffic? Negligible traffic 6 What happens to the parking when the Church is in use? Shared parking 7 Has the movement of a baseball diamond to the south side of the park been considered? Not applicable 8 Was Valleyview Road considered in the Traffic Study? No 9 What if the seniors in the building are really active and drive a lot? Not likely 10 City and Colonial are inaccu rate. about the traffic impact 11 Traffic study was poorly done 12 How long will the construction take? 12 months 13 What is the timeline of the project? construction start next spring 14 There will be pavilion in the park which will attract more park use 15 Berry Patch children will be affected by the construction traffic Not likely 16 Traffic study is incomplete and did not consider school traffic Not true 17 Who did the study and did they work with the city traffic department? RLK, yes 18 How will 18 wheel trucks enter? Will they circle the area around the park? Only on Colonial Way 19 What happens if a resident runs out of milk? They will use car to travel to Store in senior housing Jerry's 20 Should have had a bicycle traffic study done Opinion 21 Pedestrians can not cross the Crosstown 22 Have we been in contact with the MTC regarding bus routes? No 23 Was the.Crosstown considered in the Traffic Studies? Yes 24 Need construction traffic scheduled not to disturb neighbors Only on Colonial Way 25 Consider stop sign to control traffic E. Infrastructure ( Swere & Water) 1 Where is the water for use in the building coming from? 2 Will the city services for the building be impacted? Such as EMT, Fire, Police and hospitals 3 Does Colonial Way need to be widened? No F. Environmental 1 Will there be a basement? Yes 2 Trillium and other wild flowers will be disturbed (consider taller building and a smaller footprint) Being studied 3 What happens to the wetlands and wildlife in the area? 4 Have we met with the 9 Mile Creek Watershed District? �e� Informal 5 Will the building impact the wetlands on the south side of the Crosstown as Risk to owners 2 the high school expansion did? No 6 Will the bike trail come through this property? No 7 Where is the water table? 8 feet below grade 8 Fox have been sighted on this land Opinion 9 What is the environmental impact on the park? None 10 What is the height of the parking lot lights? Approx. 20 feet 11 Will the lights shine into the neighborhood? No, down only 12 Aren't we building in a flood plain? No 13 More Green Space is needed in Edina Opinion G. Viability of the project 1 What if the space is not leased up? Risk to owners 2 Why does it have to be so big? Is it about money? Financial feasibility 3 Why are projected rents so high? $9000 per month is too much. Comparable rents 4 What happens to the monies being generated in the operation of the building? Expenses & return 5 Smaller building will make enough money to be successful Opinion 6 Neighbors should be able to see the economics of the project to judge whether it is viable Opinion 7 What happens if the building becomes empty? Risk to owners 8 Was a market study done? Yes 9 Neighbors want to review the market study Yes 10 Gramercy has had problems, will we? Are they a competitor? Not comparable 11 Won't the proximity to the Crosstown be a negative No 12 The planned services should be reduced and still have a successful operation Unknown 13 What happens if the project does not work? Will there be more apartments constructed? Zoned only for seniors 14 Colony at Eden Prairie is not full Above 95% occupancy 15 There is turnover of employees at the Colony facility Not more than typical 16 Rents at the Colony are less than what is projected for this site todays rents ve future 17 If project fails, will state force subsidized housing to be the use? No 18 Month to month rents means a highly transient resident base Not for seniors 19 Developer will have made all of their money once construction is completed No H. Process 1 45 days for zoning changes is too quick state law 2 Neighbors beyond the 1000 foot city requirement should have been notified state law 3 The rezoning sign should have been displayed in other places 4 Concern about the type of people who will be employed in the building All screened 5 The zoning of the property should not be changed from R -1 Opinion 6 Why didn't the city and Colonial give notice to everyone when the project was first contemplated Opinion 7 Did the Church members vote on this project? Do they know about it? Yes 8 Why weren't the neighbors surveyed before the Church began its deliberations? Opinion 9 Not every member of the Church wanted this project. Yes 10 Often the City Council does not make the correct decisions _ 11 Will the Church be forthcoming about when the City Council meetings will be? Yes 12 Will the Park Designation fee be waived? Unknown 13 Impacts over 1500 homes (area much wider than what city required to be contacted) Opinion 14 PR -5 is the wrong zoning designation A40 15 Use of the property is not consistent and compatible to the neighborhood Opinion 16 How many Colonial members live in Edina? In Countryside? Private information Other 1 There should be a computer generated flyover of the area Yes 2 Why do non -Edina members of the Church get to vote on the project? Opinion 3 Housing values in the area will be negatively affected Opinion 4 Colonial is now less spiritual Opinion 5 Colonial represents the greed'of Wall Street, it is too commercial Opinion 6 Can a church own a for profit operation like this building? Yes 7 Will there be TIF as a part of the project? Possibly 8 What kind of people would live here? Seniors 9 Tear -downs are impacting neighborhood without neighbors' input Opinion 10 There is a need for this type of facility in Edina Opinion 11 Who will finance the project? Is it HUD financing? FHA 232 12 What is the true Christian nature of Colonial? Opinion 13 We have treated our former pastors poorly Opinion 14 The project should donate more to the park area to help out Opinion 15 Project should post a $5000 bond to offset costs of searching for Memory Care residents who wander off and need city assistance 16 This causing neighbors too much stress in the current economic times �9 The Waters Senior Living of Edina Submitted by The Waters Senior Living List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exterior Renderings of The Waters Senior Living of Edina Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F 11 Comparative Height Illustration Flora and Fauna Study Final Rezoning Permit Application Final Development Plan Application Subdivision Application Exhibit A Exterior Renderings .4 rMA 20 l�fll ka a, N ► r,�R L The Waters Senior Living of Edina View from the Countryside Park in summer Exist tN6 ANi AS PtANtEO meQ CEt +t -7 MT.. Mir 7. '. � +t, •,� . .(� The Maters Senior Living of Edina View from the Crosstown in summer The Waters Senior Living of Edina View from the Colonial Church in summer _x 4 .Mow The Waters Senior Living of Edina View from the Countryside Park without trees The Waters Senior Living of Edina View from the Colonial Church without trees The Waters Senior Living of Edina View from the Crosstown without trees Exhibit B Comparative Height Illustration fi A THE WATERS SENIOR OF Comparative heights illustration :Elevatio WWI �M &M r' ■r rr � I _. 1 r r tons - - - ���=Klllmmlv=Mjnl) - r Station Meeting House'I Exhibit C Flora and Fauna Study 2i May 28, 2010 Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. Shelter Corporation c/o John Dietrich 6110 Blue Circle Drive Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Subject: Report for a pedestrian vegetation and animal survey for part of Lot 1 Block 2 of Colonial Church of Edina, 6200 Colonial Way Edina, Minnesota 55425 Approximately 6.12 acres PIN: 05- 116 -21 -21 -0005 Acorn Project: 10464 The purpose of this document is to report the findings of a plant and animal survey that was conducted during the week of May 2, 2010 and on May 25, 2010 on the subject site. The survey covered the 6.12 acre site except for inundated wetland areas. The site was located in Township 116, Range 21, in the northwest quarter of Section 05 in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site is shown on the USGS Quad map figure. Methods A request was submitted to the Minnesota Department ofNatural Resources ( DNR) for data in the Natural Heritage Database to determine if documented rare features or occurrences have been documented. Results of the Natural Heritage Database are pending. This document will be updated if the DNR has documented occurrences on this site. Geographical Information Sciences (GIS) data was reviewed and is attached showing historical features such as aerial photos, wetlands, pre - settlement vegetation, significant biological features, and topography. Three field visits occurred on the subject site. Employees of Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Acorn) conducted the plant survey using a pedestrian survey documenting plant and animal species or their evidence as they were encountered. Since the project took place in early May some species were not significantly mature enough to identify. A GPS was used to document the location of species ofnote as they were encountered. A tree survey completed by others was also reviewed (Not included in this report). The location of the dominant plant species were also recorded using the GPS. Findings The subject site was located on the Colonial Church of Edina property, south of Colonial Way and Countryside Park. It consisted of the eastern bituminous parking area, in the center, surrounded by wooded land on the east and west, and shrubs and grasses on the south. A list of plants identified on the site is provided in Appendix 1. A list of animals common to this area is provided in Appendix 2. Note the animal list is not a list of animals observed but those who may use the site. 8040 Stevens Avenue South- Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -1236 A Voice & Fax (952) 888 -4901 E -mail: tom@AcornEnvironmental.com Y k s'` May-28,2010 Shelter Corporation, c/o John Dietrich, Colonial Church of Edina, Plant and Surv* Project Number 10464 2 R Page 2of 3 r Plant Communities F�`- Five plant communities were observed on this site and shown on Figure 2. Area 1 was c�'X wetland observed on the west side of the site. This area borders the site on the west. It appe,S the wetland was excavated in the early 1970s to create open water pond conditions. Since the 1930s this area appears to have been a flow through wetland with reed canary grass as a dominant species. It appears that it was used for agricultural production such as hay. Dredge spoil appears to have been deposited in this time period along the eastem side of the wetland in Area 2. The wetland is listed as DNR Public Waters wetland #27 -672W and it is shown on the National Wetland Inventory map as a Cowardin PUBGx type wetland. This area is inundated all the time. The depth of water appears to be more than three feet deep. Abrupt steep edges from wetland to upland were observed. Area 2 was between the parking lot and the wetland and was a north -south oriented wooded strip about 100 feet wide. The soil in much of this area was disturbed. There were indications of both excavation and deposition of soil. It appears likely that soil was excavated during creation of the pond was cast and spread in this area. The dominant trees in this area now consist of common buckthorn, box elder, eastern cottonwood, willow, and elm. Garlic mustard, stinging nettles, enchanter's nightshade, and currant species were common in this area. A flower garden was maintained along the walking path leading to the church. Prior to construction of the parking lot it appears by aerial photographs that this area was agricultural land and wetland. Area 3 was located to the south of the parking area, near TH 62. It was on a short hill where the dominant vegetation was box elder, eastem cottonwood, reed canary grass, garlic mustard, and smooth sumac. Both late and tall goldenrod were observed with an occasional black cherry and hickory seedling. Although disturbed, the extent of disturbance was less than on the east. Oftentimes if reed canary grass is observed on hills, the seed was carried there in deposited soil. This area also appears to have been used for agricultural production prior to construction of the parking lot. Area 4 was located on the northeast - southwest ridge which follows the eastem edge of the parking lot. Aerial photographs show that this area was not wooded in the 1930 -50s. The plant community was likely pasture grasses. On the south half of this ridge now has a very dense stand of common buckthom in the forb, shrub and tree layers. Box elder and garlic mustard were the other dominant species in this area. Along the top of the ridge, a dense monotypic stand of reed canary grass was observed in a strip about 100 feet by 60 feet. This appears to be a disturbed area as it is uncommon for such a robust stand of reed canary grass to grow on the top of a hill. Area 5 was located in the northeast portion of the site. It was wooded in the 1937 aerial photo. A 2.5 acre portion of this wood -lot remains on the site. The original size of the woodlot was about nine acres. The dominant tree species now are common buckthorn, white and red oak, and quaking aspen. Black cherry, hackberry, black walnut were also observed. Near the fire station in the lower area eastem cottonwood was a dominant species. Area 5 also had species such as nodding trillium, false Solomon's seal, bedstraw, blue cohosh, lopseed, yellow violet, columbine, bloodroot, wild leek, wild geranium, Jack -in- the - pulpit, baneberry, 8040 Stevens Avenue South- Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -1236 ' Voice & Fax (952) 888 -4901 E -mail: tom@AcornEnvironmental.com §L `< May 28, 2010 Shelter Corporation, c/o John Dietrich, Colonial Church of Edina, Plant and Animal Survey Project Number 10464 Page 3of 3 wood anemone, Canada may flower and others listed in Appendix 1. Efforts have been undertaken to remove buckthorn in some areas. The efforts have had mixed results. Mature buckthorn has been reduced however many new seedlings were emerging and will likely reclaim this area. Conclusions The site consisted of five plant communities. All of the plant communities have been disturbed to some extent. Areas 1 -4 do not have the plant communities that existed in the 1930- 1950s. Area 5 is the only area that has the same plant community, a remnant oak woodlot remains on the site. It is extensively infested with common buckthorn although efforts to control it have occurred. Common buckthorn and garlic mustard are both invasive and dominant plant species on the entire site. Efforts to control buckthorn have occurred in Area 5 with temporary success. No significant, rare or listed plants, animals or communities were observed on this site. The available information from the DNR, at this time also shows no significant plant communities on this site. If the DNR Natural Heritage inventory shows listed or significant features when it is obtained, this report will be updated. This report does not guarantee that listed plants or animals do not exist on the site. It reports the findings of the observations and available sources of information used in preparation of this document. Sincerely, Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. rA Thomas Braman Biologist/ Environmental Scientist, Certified Wetland Delineator #1112 A 8040 Stevens Avenue South- Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -1236 '� Voice & Fax (952) 888 -4901 E -mail: tom@AcornEnvironmental.com Approximate Site Limits Edina, Hennl Co., to �y4�hb y 0 0 Feet F .U4 a r� M A 1Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sM I GIS @AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcomEnvironmental.com Reviewed by Figure 2 TRB 5-27-10 Project Name: Project Numher. Plant Communities Colonial Church of Edina 10464 �4,a 3 ass , 4- Is L Approximate Site Limits Edina, Hennl Co., to �y4�hb y 0 0 Feet F .U4 a r� M A 1Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sM I GIS @AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcomEnvironmental.com Reviewed by Figure 2 TRB 5-27-10 Project Name: Project Numher. Plant Communities Colonial Church of Edina 10464 �4,a Area 2 Eastern Cottonwood, a ea 5 Box Elder, Oak, BucKthoi n, Willow, . Aspen, Basswood. - Buckthom Cnhnnwnnd Area 1 oft she Excavaled Wetland; ' Iz `1 a.. .x ,.., . :- .. .....- Area4 Box Elder, _ ,- - Area 3: Bucktham O r Box Elder, ' Read Canary Grass y'rlxr jv Smooth Sumac�i .,�Mn�a" r� Approximate Site Limits Edina, Hennl Co., to �y4�hb y 0 0 Feet F .U4 a r� M A 1Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sM I GIS @AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcomEnvironmental.com Reviewed by Figure 2 TRB 5-27-10 Project Name: Project Numher. Plant Communities Colonial Church of Edina 10464 �4,a Appendix 1 Plants observed on site 1 Rhus wilobata sumac,smooth 2 Urtica dioica nettle,stinging 3 Barbarea tulgaris rocket,yellow 4 Solidago altissima golden- rod,tall 5.4nemone quinquefolia thimble- weed,american woodland 6 Ulmus americana elm,american 7 Ulmus rubra elm,slippery 8 Trillium cernuum trillium,nodding 9 _Ouercus rubra oak,northern red 10 _Ouercus alba oak,white 11 Tilia americana basswood,american 12 Junipers virginiana cedar,eastern red 13 Celtis occidentalis hackberry,common 14 Populus deltoides cotton- wood,eastern 15 Populus grandidentata aspen,big -tooth 16 Populus tremula aspen,quaking 17 Populus alba poplar, white 18 Uvulw a sessilifolia bellwort,sessile -leaf 19 Hydrophyllum water- leaf,virginia virginianum 20 Maia71thenium canadense wild- lily -of -the- valley 21 Actaea rubra red baneberry 22 Vi.alictrum dioictun meadow- rue,early 23 Cornus racemosa dogwoodgTay 24 Cornus stolonifera dogwood,red -osier 25 Aquilegia con.adensis columbine,wild 26 Sanguinaria canadensis bloodroot 27 Arisaema triphyllum jack -in- the - pulpit, swamp 28 Carex pensylvanica common oak sedge 29 Phgnza leptostaclrya lopseed,american 30 Cauloplryllum blue cohosh thalictroides 31 Prunus serotina cherry,black 32 Prunus virginimaa cherry,choke 33 Impatiens capensis jewelweed 34 Malva neglecta Wallr. cheeses, common mallow 35 Bromus inermis smooth brome 36 Allium tricoccum leek,small white 37 Viola pubescens violet,downy yellow 38 Leonurus cardiaca L. motherwort, lion's tail 39 Geranium maculatum L. wild geranium 40 Toxicodendron radicans ivy,poison 41 Alliaria petiolata mustard,garlic 42 Acer negundo box -elder 7 M,grR'f4 2 B ZQf® 6 43 Salix amygdaloides 44 Cana cordiformis 45 Juglans nib a 46 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 47 Rhamnus cathartica 48 Rhamnus frangula 49 Lonicera tatarica 50 Ribes hirtellum 51 Vitis riparia 52,Vepeta cataria 53 Taraxacum officinale 54 Arcticwn lappa 55 Poa pratensis 56 Solids ,o altissima 57 Euphorbia esula 58 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 59 Vicia sp. 60 Cirsium am,ense 61 Oxalis Sp. 62 Verbascum thapsus 63 Circaea lutetiana 64 Smilacina racemosa 65 Phalaris arundinacea 66 Cirsium sp. 67 Dillium cernuum 68 Galium boreale 69 Galium aparine 70 Agropyron repens 71 Ambrosia artemisiifolia 72 Glecoma hederacea 73 Solanum Sp. 74 Rumex crispus 75 Plantago major 76 Thlaspi anense willow,peach -leaf hickory,bitter -nut walnut,black ash,green buckthom,common buckthom,glossy hon eysuckl e,tartari an gooseberry,hairy -stem grape,river -bank catnip dandelion, common great burdock bluegrass,kentucky golden- rod,tall leafy spurge creeper,virginia vetch species thi stl e, creeping woodsorrel common mullein nightshade, southern broad -leaf ench fal se- sol omon's- seal, feather grass,reed canary thistle trillium,nodding bedstraw,northem bedstraw,catchweed quackgrass ragweed,annual ivy,ground nightshade dock,curly plantain,common penny - cress,field k� Appendix 2 Potential Animals on the site: Mammals Deer Racoon Skunk Wood Chuck Rabbit Grey Squirrel Opossum Beaver Muskrat Moles Mink Red Fox Bats Chipmunks Coyote Mice Rats Shrew Weasels Birds, Amphibians and Reptiles A large variety of woodland birds and waterfowl and amphibians and reptiles may and likely do use this site. No known rare or unique habitat was observed on this site. �. 8 010 Edina nn epin Cb';- TnIfe � t Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. t4 F 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 4 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sM GIS@AcornEnvironmental.com vmw.Acorn Env ironmental.com i" Reviewed By Date' 0 400 Feet Fi ure AP 2009 TRB 5 - 27 - to -C Project Name: Project Number: I I L '" I Aerial Photo ra h 2009 c — Photograph Colonial Church of Edina 10464 IF7- IkOw .1 Colonial Way :; . Approximate oximate Site Limits MN 62 "k4* x. S 4-� Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. Et ennWln Qp-%Ohnesota . V A. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone/Fax: (952) 888-4901 s GISgAcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironrnentaI.CDM )4 WqRw ---c 5y Date 0 400 Feet Figure AP 2008 JIRII 5-27 -10 Project Name: Project Number. Aerial Photograph 2008 Colonial Church of Edna 10464 Colonial Church -o-f Edina MN 62 ial Approximate Site Limits *6 -Ifs Edina '�7pinc Mipr*� Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. e8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone/Fax: (952) 888-4901 ' SM GIS@AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironmental.rom Reviewed By Date: Figure AP 2003 TRB 15-27-1 -140 Feet Project Name: Project Number: 0 I Aerial Photograph 2003 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 2k.w d . F I I I pi-- 1 F' 4! ` !ht_ s rye' aw3w r.. t- r - Approximate Site Limits A. 3 . v I i Edina- Hgnnepin'ria Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. \� / 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 'qW Mfg sa GIS @ACOrnEnvironmental.com www.AcoFnEnvironmental.com Reviewed 3y Date: 0 59,0 0 Feet Figure AP 2000 TRB 5 - 2 7 - 1 �, Project Name: Project Number. Aerial Photo 2000 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 t E c - MIM Ow 0NjAW tmat._s_ T WWJ31 ass - - . - - o .. _ as - � _•f -..... ,a S + - i ti �• AoDmimate Site Limits tt r Y Edina, H °sue- in Co.,` 0 U Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sm GIS@AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironmental.com Figure AP 1997 TRB ed By 5 - 27-10. Project Name Pr ject Number: aerial Photo 1997 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 0 A k.'h ..�i,•, 77,.r, T11 F LAP i. 4 f J WY J wk_ L4 71VIR 4 Cl_ Approximate Site Limits ELVIN-- A- Edina, n— pin C>sota Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. I w ot �A AOAJ,& 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 C4 Phone/Fax: (952) 888-4901 sm GISgAcornEnvironmental.corn www-Acc)rnEnvironmental.corn I Reviewed BY Date Figure AP 1991 JIRII 5-27-10 0 eet Project Name: Project Number: Aerial Photo 1991 Colonial Church of Eciin. 10464 d— X .01 ..ago 1111111a.— Approximate Site Limits t. 31 Edina, He, nepin Co. �iv*A �1 Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone/Fax: (952) 888-4901 SM GISC&AcornErTvironmental.com www.AcomEnvironmental.com Reviewed B y. Date: Fioure AP 1971 ITRB 5-27-10 0 Feet Project Name: Project Numoer. Aerial Photo 11-12-1971 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 �� � ...� :- - I r . ,fie^_ i r •" wk-ly�^'t? U-1' Apprdxir�at Edina, Hennepin Co., Minnesota i :.ass'• � -_ . _.. _ `T � 'fir ���; �... ► '� -�'��- is v` �r J q y � Y I! 0 500 Feet Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. f 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 5N. GIS @AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironmental.com Reviewed By Date: Figure AP 12 -67 TRB 15-27-10 Project Name: Project Number. Aerial Photo 12 -19 -1967 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 t - A j, lip r Apprdxir�at Edina, Hennepin Co., Minnesota i :.ass'• � -_ . _.. _ `T � 'fir ���; �... ► '� -�'��- is v` �r J q y � Y I! 0 500 Feet Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. f 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 5N. GIS @AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironmental.com Reviewed By Date: Figure AP 12 -67 TRB 15-27-10 Project Name: Project Number. Aerial Photo 12 -19 -1967 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 N k 1WAr Wllpzp j r. 1-4- J11 -c-4 r 4-4 Approximate Site Limits 1Y r I I I t-lt Edi ennepin Cut, Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone/Far (952) 888-4901 GISgAcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironmental.com 1 r =e -ad By Date: 0 500 St Figure AP 5-3-1960 M 5_7 - 10 Project Nam Number: r: Aerial Photo 5-8-1960 Col--;al Church I Edina 10464 62 t4-1 - i i 4_0� 4 Z i �• iM �h e Ak iR jj � R 5 woo- Approximate Site Limits Vii, x six y, E 4nnepin Co., 'n rota Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sM GIS@AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironmental.com Reviewed y. Date: Fi ure AP 1956 TRB 5-27-10 500 Feet IJ . Project Name: Project Number • .J Aerial Photo 5 -7 -1956 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 IEL.--M AP 500,,' 0 3 4 zw Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. gf,�y 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 r �N'fj Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 1 r. GISC&AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcornEnvironmental.com Reviewed By. Date: Figure AP 5 -9 -1947 TRB -1 Project Name: Project Number: Aerial Photo 5- 9 -1947A Ai-t Church of Edina 10464 A `' Wr77 4�7 to Site Limits Edina, hbjepin�W nes Minot ' —a Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone/Fax: (952) 888-4901 SM GISgAcornEnvironmental.com wvvw.Acc)rnEnvironmental.com Reviewed By. Date: 5-27-1 1 Fiqure AP 7-1-1937 TRB 0 Project Name: P,qject Numbe,: 0 Aerial Photo 7-1-1937 Colonial Church of Edina 10464 Approximate Site Limits Aow -a Ed in co., sots Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. tom" 'GO' E i 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 t? 4 mine Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sif I GIS @AcornEnvironmental.com www,AcornEnvironmental.com Reviewed By: Date: Figure iVILCCS TRB 5 - 7 - 1 2 �` eet Project Name: Project Number. a' Minnesota Land Cover Classification System Colonial Church of Edina 10464 fg� Bredeson (27 -50 P) Edina, Hennepin Co„ Minl)esot2 Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4 / A. 8040 Stevens Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Phone /Fax: (952) 888 -4901 sns GIS@AcornEnvironmental.com www.AcomEnvironmental.com Reviewed 83r. Date: Fi ure PWI TRB 15-27- 10 0 500 Feet J1 Project Name Project Number. i �' fi�.� I DNR Public Waters — �'L � Inventory Colonial Church of Edina 10464 251 Bc Ecological Subsections Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, age, sexual orientation or disability. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to MN -DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul MN 55155 -4031; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20240. This document is available in alternative formats to individuals Wth disabilities by calling (651) 296 -6157 (Metro Area) or 1- 888 - MINNDNR (MN Toll Free) or Telecommunication Device for the Deaf/TTY: (651) 296 -5484 (Metro Area) or 1- 800 -657 -3929 (Toll Free TTY). C 1999, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Compiled by: Beltraml County Blandin Paper Company MN Center for Environmental Advocacy MN Department of Agriculture MN Department of Natural Resources Natural Resources Conservation Service Potlatch Corporation USDA Forest Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service �I lFr.�F 4 For more information contact: nesote ECS Specialist MN DNR, Division of Forestry Resource Assessment Program 413 SE 13 Street Grand Rapids, MN 55744 ce>unuarr� (218) 327 -4449 ext 239 uAnwa r�ou�rs September, 2000 Division of Forestry P Ecological Land Classification Program 212Mb 212Ma 212La a _ 212Lc 212Le .._ 212t>!b`' 212Na 212Ld' ?i2Nd 212Lb 212NC _ - Glacial Lake Superior Plain (212Ja) St. Croix Moraine (212Jd) 212,Ja Mille Lacs Uplands (2121m) Border Lakes (212La) - North Shore Highlands (212Lb) i Nashwauk Uplands (2121-c) .: Toimi Uplands (2121-d) 212Kb ® Laurentian Uplands (212Le) ® Littlefork Vermilion Uplands (212Ma) —. Agassiz Lowlands (212Mb) - - Chippewa Plains (212Na) St. Louis Moraines (212Nb) Pine Moraines and Outwash Plains (212Nc) 12Jd '; Tamarack Lowlands (212Nd) - Blufflands (2221-c) 'i Rochester Plateau (2221 - ) " Hardwood Hills (222Ma) Big Woods (222Mb) Anoka Sand Plain (222Mc) 251 Ba t .r' ' d St. Paul Baldwin Plains and Moraines (222Md) 222Mb ° Oak Savanna (222Me) Aspen Parklands (223Na) ._ -, F Red River Prairie (251Aa) Minnesota River Prairie (251 Ba) Coteau Moraines (25113b) _ M., Inner Coteau (251Bc) _ Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, age, sexual orientation or disability. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to MN -DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul MN 55155 -4031; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20240. This document is available in alternative formats to individuals Wth disabilities by calling (651) 296 -6157 (Metro Area) or 1- 888 - MINNDNR (MN Toll Free) or Telecommunication Device for the Deaf/TTY: (651) 296 -5484 (Metro Area) or 1- 800 -657 -3929 (Toll Free TTY). C 1999, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Compiled by: Beltraml County Blandin Paper Company MN Center for Environmental Advocacy MN Department of Agriculture MN Department of Natural Resources Natural Resources Conservation Service Potlatch Corporation USDA Forest Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service �I lFr.�F 4 For more information contact: nesote ECS Specialist MN DNR, Division of Forestry Resource Assessment Program 413 SE 13 Street Grand Rapids, MN 55744 ce>unuarr� (218) 327 -4449 ext 239 uAnwa r�ou�rs September, 2000 Division of Forestry P Ecological Land Classification Program The +eaters senior Living of Et6vo4 9 (? at the Colonial Church of Edina 28 MAY 2010 4 Boundary /Topographic Tree Survey - Af%r•FOSO i�i1- 'i1= 11- mq•4bw �) of ' L "V, ��, L: e..- p.M -MOww al �'a / k0 The Waters Senior living of Edina o .0 0 �s�eww.±w.as . ®yam Iwo 3:: COLONIAL CHURCH EOiNA, MN p.. M sana..., ■LEOE 4 . wtYw ��wma 8 a 'r Ey_y11 `LA k F I a lim: qI 6j-j O r Z a � -:t.- 15,-N qCll - - - - - - - - - - — DEMOLITION NOTES: THEMATERS ME WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA .. . ... ... .... ..... rrTh. CW-W Ch,-h.fFAi. UTlLrTY CUNTACTS' . KEY MarES. 'Too AM G 0 (& KZ) 0 0 0 00 0 60 0 3i I .43 0 06 L o (Do 0 o so Go 36 ao A DEMOLITION NOTES: THEMATERS ME WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA .. . ... ... .... ..... rrTh. CW-W Ch,-h.fFAi. UTlLrTY CUNTACTS' . KEY MarES. LEGEND, x, X- FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE DEMOLITION PLAN C201 -1 THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING FINAL ' , > >. a cldl o— - - -- – 4 Q O ' R- -- - ------ - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - -- lbv col- _J3 % I Q o a 0 cl \� • � ' �' � \ \C � ' ' ,1 dr." � + +... "g ry Q r \IC _ 4.1 ,v, , 1w. - 1 � . —FR-'+ 051 GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT: PARpNG SUMMARY IEGEND ZONING REQUIRMEWS: sw.6.`� �,,,,, .,.s Kass .► ..� m ... .. s,s.. ses ,,.,..v- n.,�.s .... s.o_ Ao s . musrz -,•:_ w � o':n -.w. u..:.sNr ,errs .. —rzs wwrs N ja , . , . � .•,+.,., ......,�s,.....s . �°:.n�ra A:� «a i� ; m s ..m s.o. :i w�OPOna nnoer. 0�us., I•i7 • THE WATERS SfiMORLiVING �' •�� ' " "' `` FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE LAYOUT PLAN T H EWA T E R S F S`> _ OF EDINA�p� ��.• `" '0i- 0°I-0° 56NIOR Lt v�N f.' � K 61pM1 i Pvo.cd5coorRnuegooheCmpmS�s, — X300 I •(The(;.i -iel Chm ib rFAio• _ L__ r F . .� J'i 'k— ilk v'aq, _+-c �t I �� ppC��pt, t'V''•�Q_. t — — — id i r ., •,r may, �. SURFACING LEGEND LEGEND STGRMWATER MANAGEMENT SUMMARY: —,,,�� �s a..r ..s - �., , .,,,e EARTHWORK NOTES:.' irO°u ..n.... �.'� ��» run•.,. -- .._..- - �. w..c _ .•-u w O "n.°° �� awsws ss au�� rAn mn sn�.n.o � owcv.i � _ � ,.r u. » . •m -.,w nrr.w v �- .. .u.'�xi`'w..n+•rui�q vw -{j� w uz o.ur w++, 777 wry' �i•ec e..m ws i'r •i'u, ' uw ur. u o... r ve. s. . a.n. rr .. • »•4. o .n e . c. w r oei »a.R var �..r .'. T H EWA T E R S l!.'>••w ••• FINAL DEVELOPMENT PUW SFTE GRADING. D NAGE, Tf 'WATERS SENIOR LIVING RAI OF EDINA m .s snw AND SURFACING PLAN Iy sseron uvrnc pmpwTh. \V/J C'.400 c.1 i.] ch'hf1wivp�r y,yj�' -__ efTTo CalrmiU Churd�efl�ru �',N.Lr.. REVISION NISIORY- 719541 L s� r-� _� TEE WATERS SENIOR LIVING THEWATERS OF EDINA 19 of The Colonic Chwch of Edire di FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN —i FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAI tmu" THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING ill �ERIO' ELEVATIONS THEWATERS OF EDINA SENIOR LIVING- Pawased Scuior llomiag = the cmwm an. ci-w ch—h.rw- RMS N MSTORY - TKM 91— A401 o A o, o o �: 1 THE• . ,' COLONIAL CkiUkCH . OF '� � � j 1�1���I�III(� f!�� / % ,l — _ EDINA .. -. 1 1. l ��_ mil=✓ 1- `��I�I�,I�gl;�a �%f +' l (� � - .: L .+rte — ==— R,uar j�.�� ` L (�— II, S E l�E. ; C 11�1�J` air �'/ �1 ��ieaeluwa�i,a anu�.aal9l MCXTOonnww `I' 1 � f J 3 �1 r V I i i. ii'i u.w�ns'iiN° •I 1 • as 3s- , - e A o a I J1 i. / rn +z»xnla I n�hle w ..il 1 I ' t - , e t •1 YI ra nu aw _ 1 \114•j ?:ylN[ a�' oN uuncr ♦.Js Il Y \ , .p� (� ��� I,I :... r.�n ^ J'"° +q��'• r rd/•11 1'.K+ v� :v i v £ .. j `I 4 I ' w� . r �`�`'%'Y °� % J-- •i' /'� ,t \ `k/' r 7 k29 �j ' wp�OiiJ'O - -- - ,1, A �1.-- -P�.wc _ `� � � �� - -- - - - -- ------- - - - - -- � T^ jMECnA.�lcnl • `, • r�l���_.i Y� {.'1 •` JN'JJJIT '0 RAJ 'L•ff4 -J ° .r.+.e �„T. •--_IJ u ��°• 'J•"�nR6.� i ' j)J', ��n��IL�'nWJWlluwumn� 1 ` ♦`'` /'� �';{�_•.1 '� f�°dii f/ r;�'�`� �� .:' ♦`;♦ \ 011a' of a1 / � n.. nm "� n¢, u,.. q • 1 an h.iuum.¢. i . tip♦ ��`�'' �I�• � % ♦�[�: ♦ `,!'� ♦ / yr { `: q -n � - � � - d¢.. °.va .ul .,d ' a. A. ' ((oK � I - rtlen� - -' ,11. � •- � !x' Q� ' i —r /C7 � \. _ � �n.. n. loon 4'I PoA. Noun. °in�wuna7f N � ��' •'1 },` �' `• /: ♦•♦ ♦� :/ �� -a �\� {'� � .. �,. I 't`' ♦t . 4_ .+. . ' `4t',,\ /�'` /� ♦``; ./` %�. i� � .` ♦ ♦♦ / � ��_ `i 7_ .. .. e.[ m °,...«p .,° ^..SQL• i . w .• as '.: \: +IS. v { ♦� ` " �: �+X,.,�: ♦ � , � ��-- �._ r iwF.� {�i�.a e..,. .. \` `�s-- ,`�, �t � li ff � • ♦'�[`♦ ♦ -� ' s_ Ep :n.. uumm �{•.r 1 •.°: I - l - �'�• / a' - .iii °I'.$'":r°R`n: „'rt I. gip[ - • �\'113;1,1\,�� 11 {Qm,. — �i, .4� 14..,11[_). °lT 4V?. f�T r. 1� ' i .. "”' " I [ /'ifs- ; _ _ r • i ". � i i // / 4�� � �'�� ��.,. �f FA LLL JVPJ —�_ C11-1 PACKA e w. i FOR ONFORIWATIOW1 ONLL.1P — VIEW LOOKING EAST w -7, 77 MM Lin %- r 23 DECEMBER 2009 oftouE 0 titf.1.11A I MOV ftAej t7' � low Wt F-7 ------ ---- I it no jj J SCHEMATIC RENDERED NORTH ELEVATION al dl o.: Ellin: 23 DECEMBER 2009 PRIE L If*$ 0 At Y �� AN �I !II I� 1 RY � O a +_ TFm ('-01011(a1 church of Gdillid - I "`ate TMLL'I � 23 DEGEM9ER 2000 1 pR��I�f11 �►�►Ri SLAM TYPE USE - mule- FnmlLv SEtJ1oR LIVING PROPOSED OF RESIDENTIAL OWEUING UNITS ER OF R 56'np �� to ncRESAasI5TED PROPOSED NUMBER PROPOSED DENSITY - 24.4 APARTMENTS I ACRE PROPOSED SUUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL, E DUSTAMLANOIOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS - I 254 576 BUILDING GROSS SUUARE FEET OFFICE, PROPOSED GENERAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT- 56,663 SQUARE FEET APPROXIMATELY 66 SURFACE PARKING SPACES PROPOSED PARKING AREA- APPROAImATFI Y 166 PARKING SPACES UNDER THE BUILDING WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN6 AREAS - INDICATED ON SITE PLAN INDICATED ON SITE PLAN N INGRESS AND EGRESS POINTS TO SITE CONCEPT 23 DEGEM9ER 2000 1 pR��I�f11 �►�►Ri SLAM WPM i TV". �.• AD { u ali' s � ;r'C'1`�j� NEldll[IUI�H00tlRCLJi�NAI �f�C� Is ?INO * yW of I. ( ! t URCH T+1 ♦ h ell.fir •,,1 1 ' +, Il �\ ';� ! ^�� � � •� , � ;� mot„ � �{y' t ,�'iK ,I�' "lilt` L'.)��IIII 'I '.•111111 �' lil � I�II��� 23 DECEMBER 2000 041C L IaAILI PLAID Q W] r Sere/ ®r living of EdincO Jr J J MAL CHURCH OF >�C ®N®A® ® /T/ ®ate Xvl LL MN - ROPERTY DESCRIPRON: ,.. Ala. oe.e. �..I.I.aI ..w. A.......e..... PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1.2 N,.Mlz a�N wn rime u�an w seuesas t LOON wON Ml1r I1 Lam__ . a .e... I.a �o�so�d�o Sfi4Eil fE€ BE J OLINGER BLVD. 3 .f. f1H ANl vF&- ' S TA TE GEND qqOLE l0 1 enneen Cau IY�Ce,I m Yveumml, o. 33561. F,dcua lvndmnr6. SZJ'" •w cNS�e'Jf °a F11GH'N S�i COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA 1C.R. DOC. NO, SECOND ADDITION ndESE vaCS(N rs: ,M1el Ine [denld CM1wcn v1 Edw. a uinnxeln a _p v91 eery 11bn, o emw. a1 Ine idle q ae,axee 1 pw11 dWeled w Ibe Canlr I Eel . lb—b ]. caoeeAi u,uxa a — rwsl AowtpN E. .wlen end Mnllea n, COLOIAAE CIMCII V —A SECOND AOd,IUd ma dee, Fw Y edcele lv I e I 1< Iv nudY ua I— lb- ---I n wee edd C N Cnv<n el a x mlwln n -p OI cepv Im, uneer Ine Ivne vl Ine Slaln v1 umeele.me vw,ed IFwe p nenle Ie ee pe by .I p qe Ml.cv In eer a YY. n le }non EaMe, afil cv w01m b I C %enld Cnwcn p p sIA W YINNE.lA nWNp pe elbn anon IFe lee, el uMneenly, en eendl el Ine Camp I ]O,O Cdvnld LTUren Yhne•n1. scmE III FM ge9llcarR eY yr Ealnn, n ' I Na vV PuM<. rww.1R Ybneeeln 0 100 '00 1 cmndelm EWn Y FweeY cer11 wol IF OLO e c anew N 111, 1 Al ulupul rx COINA s[coNY Ananw � v.ee1 •ror IMen el 1Fe ewnee.r .mar. IFeI e6 memmelleel ae dF,yeelea 7 111�e Mal: Ine w.vm 1111 Iww ..n acv ene N ilea nlMb. p m Ine Mel: m Il ell ae unae. 1 eel e 1 IbnNV,n e r en,ed Imd +vr,e Mel: ,Fe pletne 51111 er Ywne,ela. Ine Mel I FnlAn en1111 IFell I.E. Mvl A wgwe r e v wgw.NlanewM el I Pun Iw, a 171 Z Y Y. xY<R l� •e Lae Su.w nne,Me Llvnse•xemew 3n6s Iw a \� a'E— a Sd97J'177— _ sl rz a 10 uwFtsmA ,� tt — ec6ee.Yn9.a bMere me IFI, e1Y el �o _ }0� eV ,vl Y AIwF. a 1b: -11 lend sur - - - - - - -- 1 The 1 9 p wNre cnlipeele nee ✓� 'N^ m ur cwemd.aeN[gro. � r. mo111 °m$ ^dg • E-1 Ya,NFSOIA • • 1 [0.0xIAl M xA 40aro AOptbN A eM aed .,I. er IM al EJw. upe.e,ely, el rtgd� mx1Yp Inveer nero ,n de n }9_ pl.t 76 o-nmYalme• al t.mgwlelnn Cwn1, .,h-, Enpl+eer ben re<elwe er Ine CNI E. ple,e— del pwbd nn dgeee Tom' — xn 1 "e w Iw �pnmme� ee .eew„m.eeelYe, .. New r see"'Iw.l'eusA.w. OT 2 .p67.G� a �.a1 al .,,<n <emmeel, a ",�atie'fe lA nn —El Or —A. YwxESo i ',14351 aO r IA6PAR I -El OEAAP,YEYI, Ilemgin Can11. YYnewla 1 be I -1111 — levee I—- Y }O_ end pnw N� Few even pda ry Iw,d deewind e.. Inle dn1. Onlnn n . - _ I 1 9_ Jel L AFerevn. Ceuell N.dlw eT epalr u Ta rwevml 11 ummm S Yom. 3938.663 !19691 IEN Mel em — —d fty ]U_ IF BENYNGs I, n.mroe ra,ml-. IIM.w.�•� a ea^•n I. F91bn r. a,n— Ilm ro cwnll Sm p r ^��j�` T REK T RECOrIU[e, N Y Ce b1r, e I nn I I I ,M MIF p ubme,Mel COE .-C. IX FpNA SECP6) AOOI nON •ae ,vvded � InY el ee. In Y }O� el Nee — � Y.. . x. c..an, cwnlr xgwew br. Ygnl. RLK INC. I e SHEET 1 OF 1 Cary Teague From: Tom Jenson Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:51 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: FW: The Waters Planning Commission Comments Thomas Jenson Fire Marshal Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina Mn 55436 952.826.0337 Fax 952.826.0393 ww-Ar. CitvofEdina. com / fire From: Tom Jenson Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:59 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: The Waters Planning Commission Comments Cary, Here are fire department comments for the revised site plan of the proposed building at Colonial Church, The Waters Senior Living of Edina. 1. Sheet C500 ... Relocate fire hydrant near the underground garage entrance to the southwest corner of the building. Location to be approved during plan review meetings. 2. Sheet C500 ... is the size of the water supply to the building adequate to support domestic and fire sprinkler water supply? 3. Sheet C300 ... Install a fire apparatus access road along the west and south sides of the building. Increasing the width to 10 feet for the proposed 6 and 8 foot wide sidewalk along the west and south sides of the property would meet this requirement. The sidewalk to be engineered to support the weight of fire apparatus. Can the sidewalks be connected near the loading dock along the south side? 4. Sheet L201 ... Will future growth of proposed trees along fire apparatus access road block fire apparatus? If you have any questions, let me know. Regards, Thomas Jenson Fire Marshal Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracv Avenue Edina Mn 55436 952.826.0337 Fax 952.826.0393 www.Cit-yofEdina.com/fire -�73 TO: Cary Teague, City Planner MEMORANDUM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA FROM: Jesse Struve, PE — Utility Engineer SUBJECT: Development Impacts to Water and Sanitary Sewer Systems I have reviewed the proposed changes to the development at 6200 Colonial Way. The original development had 150 units and the revised development reduced this number to 139. The original proposal of 150 units was analyzed by two engineering firms to determine if the existing water and sanitary sewer systems could accommodate the 150 unit development. Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) reviewed the existing watermain system. SEH determined that the existing watermain has capacity to provide water service, irrigation, and fire flow protection to the 150 unit building while still maintaining the same level of protection to the City (see attached email). Barr Engineering (Barr) reviewed the existing sanitary sewer system. The additional sanitary flow generated from the proposed 150 unit development was incorporated into the sanitary sewer model. There is sufficient capacity in the existing sanitary sewer lines to accommodate the proposed development (see attached email). � �3� I��RPORA�O eaa DATE: June 23, 2010 TO: Cary Teague, City Planner MEMORANDUM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA FROM: Jesse Struve, PE — Utility Engineer SUBJECT: Development Impacts to Water and Sanitary Sewer Systems I have reviewed the proposed changes to the development at 6200 Colonial Way. The original development had 150 units and the revised development reduced this number to 139. The original proposal of 150 units was analyzed by two engineering firms to determine if the existing water and sanitary sewer systems could accommodate the 150 unit development. Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) reviewed the existing watermain system. SEH determined that the existing watermain has capacity to provide water service, irrigation, and fire flow protection to the 150 unit building while still maintaining the same level of protection to the City (see attached email). Barr Engineering (Barr) reviewed the existing sanitary sewer system. The additional sanitary flow generated from the proposed 150 unit development was incorporated into the sanitary sewer model. There is sufficient capacity in the existing sanitary sewer lines to accommodate the proposed development (see attached email). � �3� Jesse Struve From: Doug Klamerus <dklamerus @sehinc.com> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:31 PM To: Jesse Struve Cc: Wayne Houle; Chad Millner Subject: RE: 20100122 6200 Colonial Way - Waters Colonial Church of Edina - sewer and water data Attachments: Max Day Pressures - With New Demand.pdf, Max Day Fire Flows - Existing.pdf; Max Day Fire Flows - With New Demand.pdf Jesse - We've looked at the above mentioned project in regards to pressure and flow. From a pressure standpoint, the model indicates that there is ample pressure available at this location with a 6 inch service and at peak flows. In addition to the approximate 130 gpm of peak domestic flow, we added an addition 30 % for irrigation flow for a total peak flow of approximately 175 gpm. Pressure at this flow rate is approximately 89 psi under maximum day demand conditions (all wells on, tanks half full). At this pressure, services will require a pressure reducing valve be installed to meet the State Plumbing Code of 80 psi maximum. In addition, an available fire flow was analyzed at the same demand conditions and an assumed 6 inch service of 100 ft. The model resulted in an available fire flow of approximately 2,000 gpm at 20 psi residual. If you have any additional questions or need additional information, please contact me at your convenience. Attached are three model run outputs for your information. Thanks Douglas E. Klamerus, PE SEH - Water /Wastewater St. Paul, MN 651.765.2973 (Direct) (See attached file: Max Day Pressures - With New Demand.pdf)(See attached file: Max Day Fire Flows - Existing.pdf)(See attached file: Max Day Fire Flows - With New Demand.pdf) "Jesse Struve" <JStruve @ci.edina . m n. us> To "Jesse Struve" 01/27/2010 08:53 <JStruve @ci.edina.mn.us >, "Doug PM Klamerus" <dklamerus @sehinc.com> cc "Wayne Houle" <WHoule @ci.edina.mn.us> Subject RE: 20100122 6200 Colonial Way - ,473 6 Jesse Struve From: Dan Nesler <DNesler @barr.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:26 PM To: Jesse Struve; Brian K. LeMon Subject: RE: 20100122 6200 Colonial Way - Waters Colonial Church of Edina - sewer and water data Jesse, I took a quick look at the impact the proposed development at 6200 Colonial Way. An additional 46,600 gallons per day were added to manhole 1438, on Tracey Avenue. I ran the model for both an average week and for a summer storm event ( -1.5" rainfall). In both cases, there was no surcharging predicted by the model caused by the proposed development flow. Based on this quick look at the model, there appears to be no issue with the additional flow. If you would like us to look at this in further detail or to look at the impact of different flows, please let myself or Brian know. Thanks, Dan Nesler, P.E. Water Resources Engineer Barr Engineering Company 952- 832 -2922 952- 832 -2601 (fax) From: Jesse Struve (mailto:JStruve @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:32 PM To: Dan Nesler; Brian K. LeMon Subject: 20100122 6200 Colonial Way - Waters Colonial Church of Edina - sewer and water data Dan, This is a development which is being explored off Colonial Way just West of Tracy Avenue. Below is their anticipated sanitary sewer contribution and they are planning on directing it to Tracy Avenue. Can you please put this in the model and let me know if there are any issues with this addition to the system. If you could please have something to me by Tuesday noon it would be helpful. Give me a call with any questions or concerns. Jesse Struve, PE Utility Engineer City of Edina direct: 952.903.5713 fax: 952.826.0389 istruve(ab,ci.ed ina. mn. us a MEMORANDUM — Plan Review ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT .. �� CITY OF EDINA DATE: June 25, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — Director of Planning FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer — SUBJECT: The Waters — Senior Living 6200 Colonial Way Engineering has reviewed the above stated project and offer the following comments: Permits needed: A Nine Mile Permit will be required for storm water, grading, and erosion control. A MCES permit will be required for the sanitary sewer extension. A MDH permit will be required for the watermain extension. An Edina Curb Cut Permit (obtained in the Engineering Department) will be required for the driveway entrance. REC and SAC fees will be required for this project. Traffic Analysis: See attached minutes of Transportation Commission for their comments. City of Edina Utility Analysis: See attached memo from Jesse Struve regarding the City of Edina Water System and Sanitary Sewer System. Sheet C500 — Site Utility Plan: 1. Provide storm water calculations for all site ponding and other watershed requirements. 2. Is the westerly pond designed to meet NURP Standards? 3. Replace hydrant at northeasterly corner of site to the new City Standard — see details online. 4. Will need to know pipe materials during next submittal. 5. A developer agreement will be required for the placement of the Sanitary Sewer within Colonial Way. Sureties along with engineering fees will be required for this portion of pipe. 6. A separate plan and profile sheet will also be required for this portion of pipe. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this second review. Thanks Pr73� G: \Engineering \General \C Streets \6200 Colonial Way \Engineering RevievA20100625 WH -Edina to CT -Edina review of 6200 Colonial way.docx `�" .a 53RDSITW 53 RD ST W SOU"I DR e— —s4TH �r w g000 RU _w7 A- 54 OD RD No OR GULF TER I "0 5PA KVJ -%A%ko 0 ` D FULLER ST IN ROBBINS ST 1 00 LN*A _ a IMRSOM AVE •. - — 'i d , I -, t SsTfl ST W • U W 55TH ST W YLVIO ETANA RD Al 'nI ST W ID -P OAK DR 4-11, LL9 56TH ST W - -rA(I E LN 'OEERO SOTH ST W. Z?' j FIELD WAY 111.1NE TER 56TH STn I DR I "KAY11tAR TOWER ST DDVRE OR: C Vj 1B 57ni ST VY 57TH ST W Iso�rlivww LN WOODLAND RD >, w> I < PIULBROOK I_ ARKWOOD LN GROVE k v 51 11 Ito ST 1-0 -GROVE 3�M STW- ST—b 1 T I 50TH ST W, �XfN RD w GAO T Ile t in rL -.13ENTON AVE SM ST W A1AY DR 0 3: 591" Sx W a ASpEN RD U > > 5, >w I. ,olo" RU I < � 4 — w ... I. OLJU;1 , 9' LE mqti 51"w -4;6. 1 ri • 0 U Z -T W Qg - LANG'ORD OR 611 0 - GOTII S DAI A PARK r 30: OTH ST W "P , . - 1. . ... TIE CIR W V�, j r w 51 IF L_ 61ST ST 61sT IST IN IEFF PL 01Rr_V4C 62 NP ST �V GLEASCIA ZND 5T W r o� 0- ., t 62ND ST W �GZND ST V4 C-1 .1 3: !4ADDOX LN. ROBERTS PL E DR L WAY > Vg .-:b3RD,STIW -r, w < 9 Z V MA J4. AVE -K STW - TF1 ST IN 7% 1 ST W vmufl' . ..... .. 5 T� Z -III ST W TFIST W L9 0 65 6 fb 0 I' IS "EK DR 14. - 50THSTIN-- Lo'ge Bud 0 a 0 -4 P�- 60TH ST W P P 67TH ST IN SE Stream ti._. &LOIS L G10A DR 7 AVE 11q I - Icb 13"NZ RD 0% Uo), Alternative Trail Routes' ALLEY VIEW RD 68TH Sr W ER TE V� L, G -9 111 ST .W BROOK DR . ... ... �4-qrll ST W w NCGUIR' D%3*k0ERnr Ln, J- CAT Team Alternative Routes City of Edina Property 13A -70TH ST W! L 70 1/2 ST IN !IST ST W, ANDOVER RD DELVID "'D 9 05E ,SUSAN AVE Edina School District Property FAE,LN AS, I A.-HAZELTONRU.' --71 1/Z ST W IINy CL44 w I i 04, 0 if 0 0 _N 19 T IDi R6� R L-S _rAlternative Trail Route Number . i I I I 'r, . -2 1 4rlffiR 117w, 0 N! S� W C, 13 Tw L9 Miles —4 DEWEY HILL RD V! KLAWj1E- 0.5 0.75 74TH W 0 0.25 ST h2OA 75T14 ST.W., Q PJAZ7rult- / f *Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflect 'I "I ST W , conceptual trail corridor and does not depict 1:3) 1 77111 ST I i actual trail alignment. E 77TI1 ST W 44- Wine Mile creek Regional Trail: City of Edina Aternati Trafl Routes 77 WIT d-v O s 0 Q-- jo ------------- ---------- 04! ----- T--M ---- itiitf--: M -6v + ---- -- Fi I T�l ao f 00. A A .59 L14070" �N rT GENERAL NUMB FOR LAYOUT' PARKING summw FINAL DEVELOPMENT Km SITE LAYOUT PLAN 'nIE WATERS SENIOR LIVING T 11 EWA� T E R S OF EDINA C300 Renovate Prep Field Improve Qqqua�allii�ty�,,.,�y itL�.'S:'eitiYa�'12 i Renovate prep -stae baseball held to match the quality standard of the existing IIIUe l.gue held (new fencing, dugouts,seating, backstops. turf and suit improvements). New Park Shelter Convenient and Accessible aii�9Na It,, i. nccJ fur a w park shelter that n ,Ihcicndy lotted for handicap a ssibili , and c ent fm aIL CeLocatmg the ,,arkesh<Iter near the puking Iol. odj.ceni to tire hockey rink, and adjacem to the ddldreni play area allows for easy nccesa and yea, mrind nse. Increase Access and Visibility to Parking Lot Utilizes Existing Parking Children's Playground Fulfills Desire for Creative free -Play Areas Opening up access and visibility by dunning the uodeib-1, or the wooded area will alone, use of the ealsl,ng nlf ,creel parking flail Is currently shared b, the el—ef, and the park. Renovauun of this Parking lot is recommended. 'Today, chtdren's c ... twity i often stymied by die pinyoptions d ay are given. Adventure and traditional playground can .Ile, n place fur duldren o hid t e crawl, scavenge. crease, and Imagine the soil from the parks hill can be used to create a nmuralimd knoll that J.—p r ,,, free play with traditional play equipment and also utilises the ea,sling adjacent wooded area. ea ag Ir Provide a Hockey Rink & Pleasure Skating Area Provide a Trail System Improves Recreational Opportunity Improves Accessibility and Provides Recreational Opportunity swell mainmin,d outdoor skat Ing An accessible Iran ayatem is rudr or high Impormnce for of the most fundamental needs rnl pack users. flu, new location of the park. the trails will allow for the hockey rink Is of preferred ,aaler access to park progranuning entadon. We e—n-,d I element, and can be utilised by I ved hub ,oils and grading as II park users as a means to walk, 11 new iglus An advents., n, or wheel through the park. skaongJ.rpi,p,.p.,,dasa(utun c Consider completing a perimeter - 4 option, sidewalk loop around the park for recreation and conn,uhit y. A aC Little League Field Prep Field Basketball Court (Full) 4) Tennis Courts (2) iij Hockey Rink `i Childrens Play Area Natural Play Area (using cut from sledding hill) Park 5helter Parking Lot Paved Trail Park Benches Adventure 5kateLoop ea ag Ir Provide a Hockey Rink & Pleasure Skating Area Provide a Trail System Improves Recreational Opportunity Improves Accessibility and Provides Recreational Opportunity swell mainmin,d outdoor skat Ing An accessible Iran ayatem is rudr or high Impormnce for of the most fundamental needs rnl pack users. flu, new location of the park. the trails will allow for the hockey rink Is of preferred ,aaler access to park progranuning entadon. We e—n-,d I element, and can be utilised by I ved hub ,oils and grading as II park users as a means to walk, 11 new iglus An advents., n, or wheel through the park. skaongJ.rpi,p,.p.,,dasa(utun c Consider completing a perimeter - 4 option, sidewalk loop around the park for recreation and conn,uhit y. A aC f - M 0 , low Olinger Boulevard i— II • • 0 0 � — — �dik Colonial Way v c a T A r- Little League Field Prep Field Pa5ketivall Court (Full) Tennis Courts (2) Hockey Kink Children5 Play Area Natural Play Area (using cut from sledding hill) Park Shelter Parking Lot Paved Trail Paris 13enche5 Adventure Skate Loop September 2008 ®R 0 ti C C c _near- « d, w 1CCruc R "� n6tA •c0e �� � 3L C i lisp, •o".e ne 2� � c .e urt � 5 e f wu=s rssc A CIA • r r °'� u c Fain .-i r. ' LEGEND: -_ Principal nA° Minor Arterial er—= "A' Minor Arterial (Re�ever) (Augmenter) --- I? Minor Arterial Collector 3 Nan Update Figure 7.1 4 F=ebruary 11, 2010 City Of Edina Mr. Steve Manhart ERLK Incorporated 6110 Blue Circle Drive Suite 100 NAinnetonka, MN 55343 ERE: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Traffic Impact Analysis - Addendum Dear Per. Manhart, Thank you for submitting the addendum to the traffic impact analysis (dated February 10, 2010) to the City regarding the recounting and analysis of the turn movements during the school year at the three intersections near the project site. Staff and the City's traffic consultant Chuck Rickart of WSB and Associates have reviewed the addendum and conclude that all studied intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. We agree that the proposed development does not significantly affect the operations or congestion of the adjacent roadway and intersections. if you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952 -626 -0445 or at iullivan ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Enclosed: Traffic Impact Analysis — Addendum Feb. 10, 2010 C: Jay Jenson - Shelter Corporation Vern Swing — RLK Incorporated Wayne Houle — City of Edina Cary Teague — City of Edina Chuck Rickart — WSB and Associates ( l�, G:\Engineering \General \C Streets \6200 Colonial Way\Traffic Review\2 0100211 _City_Response_Addendum.doc 952-927-38,61 City Hall FAX 952 -326 -039( ADS, \nircT cn-r" CTRFFT ___ TTY 952 -826 -0371 Engineering . Landscape Architecture • Planning • Surveying - Trafi,- INCORPORATED VIETODUT TO: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer COPY- Jay Jensen, Shelter Corporation FROM: OM: Steve Manhart, P.E., PTOE, PTP Vern Swing, P.E. DATE: February 10, 2010 : Trafflie Im, -pact Analysts - Addendum The Colony of Edina RILL Project No. 2009 -087 -L Cfe king extraordinary Communities whou7e@ci.edina.77i7z.us jsullivan @ci. edina. mn. us jay@,sheltercorp.com smanha7-t@r1kinc. com VSWi71g@rlki7ic.com Per the City's request, an Addendum has been prepared for the Traffic Impact Analysis for The Colony of Edina. Concern was raised by the Edina Planning Commission that the traffic counts reflected in the Traffic Impact Analysis may not have included the impacts of school traffic on the street system. In fact, the counts presented in the original analysis were taken in June, 2009. In response, AM and PM traffic turning movements were recounted in the area during the first week of February, 2010. These new peak hour directional counts were utilized to reassess the impacts of the development's trip generation with the added impact of school traffic. The attached figures illustrated the updated turning movement counts in the area. In general, Exiting Conditions Anallysig Section V of the original Traffic Impact Analysis reported the Results of the Operational Analysis. This section contained the results of the intersection operational analyses for the existing conditions. Updated Tables 4a and 4b below show the results of the Existing Conditions Analysis. Table 4a -- UPDATED Tp_ ,t+„ „ -P T�'v,, +4_- Cn-,14-Hgna An5;IVCiR —AM Peak I-lour (Feb. 20102 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement IDS reported from Sim lramc. 4 2. 95's percentile queues reported from SimTmfflc Offices: Dul-Ah - Nora Lace . Hibbing • Minnetonka o Oakdale (952) 933-0972 � 6110 Blue Circle Drive � suite 100 - Minnetonka, MN 55343 - FAX (952) 933-1153 95¢6 Percentile Queae52' LIlFtie1 S�(2ctTl�'IlIl Level of Service" Tracy Avenue & Colonial Wa A 3 (EBR Adequate queue lengths. NBL /T ueue of 35'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard B/B(SBT) Adequate que= lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A (NBL Adequate queue lengths. 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement IDS reported from Sim lramc. 4 2. 95's percentile queues reported from SimTmfflc Offices: Dul-Ah - Nora Lace . Hibbing • Minnetonka o Oakdale (952) 933-0972 � 6110 Blue Circle Drive � suite 100 - Minnetonka, MN 55343 - FAX (952) 933-1153 Table kb -- UPDATED - -i +„ fRv;etinn ar`rndifinnc Annlvcis —PM Peak Hour (Feb. 2010) In comparison with conditions described in the original report, operations of the Existing roadway network remain acceptable. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS are B or better, and all 95th percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. As with the original report, the interactions between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection were investigated to determine whether any traffic problems exist. These two intersections are only 400 feet apart. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left tam at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 95ffi percentile queues of 35 feet in the AM peak hour (up slightly from 33 feet in the original report) and 36 feet in the PM peak hour (down from 44 feet in the original report). No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. In summary, differences in findings between the original traffic analysis and this addendum are nominal. No improvements are recommended for the Existing Conditions. - Build Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the Build conditions. Tables 5a and 5b show the results of the Build conditions analysis. Table 5a — (fi.TPDATED) V 1 +o nfR„i1A f'nnrlitinnc Analysis — AM Peak Hour (Feb 2010) 1 \1rJLL1W v Intersection 7 Level of Service - -�- 95u' Percentile Quaeuues2' Intersection Level of 95"' ge>rce>mtfle Queues Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard Service Adequate queue lengths. Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way AB BL Ade to queue le nobs. NBLrr queue of 36'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard BB (NB AdeQuate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Wa A/A 2TLL Adequate queue len In comparison with conditions described in the original report, operations of the Existing roadway network remain acceptable. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS are B or better, and all 95th percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. As with the original report, the interactions between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection were investigated to determine whether any traffic problems exist. These two intersections are only 400 feet apart. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left tam at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 95ffi percentile queues of 35 feet in the AM peak hour (up slightly from 33 feet in the original report) and 36 feet in the PM peak hour (down from 44 feet in the original report). No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. In summary, differences in findings between the original traffic analysis and this addendum are nominal. No improvements are recommended for the Existing Conditions. - Build Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the Build conditions. Tables 5a and 5b show the results of the Build conditions analysis. Table 5a — (fi.TPDATED) V 1 +o nfR„i1A f'nnrlitinnc Analysis — AM Peak Hour (Feb 2010) 1 \1rJLL1W v Intersection 7 Level of Service - -�- 95u' Percentile Quaeuues2' Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/B (EBL ) Adequate queue lengths. NBL/T queue of 34'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard BB (SBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A (NBL ) Ade uate ueue len Colonial Way & West Access A/A (NBL) Ade uate queue lengths. Colonial Way & East Access AIA (NBL )TAdequate queue len 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement LOS reported from SimIrai nc. 2. 95b percentile queues reported from SimTraffic Table 5b — (UPDAT ED) T)--14-- — 4�'D -41A 6-'r..nr44finnc Q„ah,z;c —PM Peak Hour (Feb 2010) l \l..J LLiW Vl L1.iiiu v - - - Intersectian 95u° Percentile Queues Service Tracy Avenue &Colonial Way AIB EBL Adequate queue lengths. N-BL /T queue of 44'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard B/B (NBT) Ade uate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A TBL Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & West Access A/A (NBL ) Adaguata queue lengths. Colonial Way & East Access A/A (NBL Ade uate queue lengths. As with the original report, analysis of the Build Conditions indicate acceptable operations will remain on the roadway network and proposed site accesses. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS is B or better and all 95ffi percentile queues will be accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 95t' percentile queues of 34 feet in the AM peak hour (down from 44 feet in the original report), and 44 feet in the PM peak hour (down from 53 feet in the original report). No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. As was stated in the original report, if northbound left turn operational and queuing problems arise in the future due to growth in background traffic, it is recommended that this portion of Tracy Avenue be re- striped by the City to provide a dedicated northbound left turn lane onto Colonial Way. In summary, differences in findings between the original traffic analysis and this addendum are nominal. No mitigation measures are recommended for the Build Conditions. Summary of Findings An update of the turning movement counts in the area indicates minor changes in directional volumes in the AM and PM Peak Hours. When levels of service are calculated, overall intersection and worst movement LOS remain at B or better, and all 95th percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. Therefore, because the findings in this Addendum indicate minimal differences from the original Traffic Impact Analysis, the conclusions and recommendations from the original study remain intact. Furthermore, there are no changes to the Traffic Demand Management Plan as presented in, the original report. G:\Shelter Corporntion\2009- 087 -U_ CouespondenalTrzmc\Rmponse to City Comments 02 -05 -10 doc PI i Brae nrnnvea4?ri Page 3 of 3 reoruary iu, zu iu o� 0 m 0 ry E 'moo 0 of A n • u U J 2009 HRU( INC. 1 � � fr. r, %-44 77 K 1 a 45 N 5 4 70 78-V i. ayD 1 2 rs 10 22V 3 4 h9 H9 LEGEND CAM (PEAK HOUR VOLUMES xxx }� PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX IT . BL • ROADWAY 1� LANES T01 STOP MIM-MOL t 9 41 F 14 ayD � r e 18 0 B e3 12 200 SCALE IN FEET - a .r N Dulu.h, AM o y� Ftn. Lahe, S4•i lli7ililal;, hIN N btlnnclnOk�, MN C).kJ.l�, I,Qy ,ri ��cnxrn•.:Trn Ph.0 052 733 0112 o P.z: 75273311.53 n w.vallNLicnw eT 6110 Hlue Code Drive • Suim 100 • 3iinnemnka, JJX 15343 THE COLONY OF EDINA BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UPDATED) Figure # 5JA rPrOj3C1 li 2009087L ly r. t, w 4 rte. 200 SCALE IN FEET - a .r N Dulu.h, AM o y� Ftn. Lahe, S4•i lli7ililal;, hIN N btlnnclnOk�, MN C).kJ.l�, I,Qy ,ri ��cnxrn•.:Trn Ph.0 052 733 0112 o P.z: 75273311.53 n w.vallNLicnw eT 6110 Hlue Code Drive • Suim 100 • 3iinnemnka, JJX 15343 THE COLONY OF EDINA BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UPDATED) Figure # 5JA rPrOj3C1 li 2009087L D,7009 UC. - - a 7 — - l I LfCGE " I� n ' F + AM PEAK HOUR VOW HL, XXX PM PEAK HOUR !/GLUES )0(X OUNGER BLVD_. ' EMSTING ROADWAY E)0snw LANES i ! 0 I &1 �TOP E)(1571NC 5TOP CONTR0L P P as Is iH 3 2 � _. N4� ,,QQ .r�, i'ar , a . . K: f may_ _ 94 88 • I k'. H.. _ aN ,F m rlCl '. .p • I N d' w, n — v RIX Hi1,IdnF„ Mly N O kd. ML,II. MN .kam. sN qj L CnuPnunT�n Phone 952933077 V Paz: 752 933 1153 It vvv.rlkincaun la 1110 Blue Circle Drlve • Sulre lot). lfinneconka, MN 55343 qq f. ) �:5 '• t + `fig fi p� THE COLD IY ®F EDINA 2010 EXISTING VOWMES & GEOMETRICS r• r. n i« 0 200 SCALE IN FEET FIgura i 3_A II Project v 2009087L Traffic Impact Nnalyslkl for The Colony ®f Edina in Edina, MN January 19t's 2-®10 extraordinary communities MN TRAFFIC IWACI` ANALYSIS The Colony of Edina Edina, MN January 19'b, 2010 Prepared For: Shelter Corporation 1600 Hopkins Crossroad Minnetonka, MN 55305 Prepared By: INCORPORATED RLK Incorporated Minnetonka Office 6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 952- 933 -0972 RLK Project No. 2009 -087 -L TABLE OF CO1�7TEIN, T S I. EXECUTIVE 9,17Y 4ARY ......... ... ..... ............. ..>............ --- .......... .......... ... ...... .............. -. -A 111. PROPOSED DEVELOP WENT AND STUDY AREA ......................... ..............................2 +. h.3US T I!1G CGR�IT10 5 ................................................................... ..............................g A. Data Collection ............................................................................................... ............................... 5 B. Existing Traffic Volumes ................................................................................. ..............................5 C. Roadway Descriptions ...................................................................................... ..............................5 D. Intersection Descriptions .................................................................................. ..............................6 IV. PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................>..,.......................... ..............................8 A. Trip Generation ................................................................................................. ..............................8 B. Trip Distribution and Assignment .................................................................... ............................... 8 C. Build Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................... ..............................9 V. RESULTS GF T BE OPEIIA.TIONAL ANALYSIS ............................. .............................12 A. .......................... ............................... Traffic Forecast Scenarios ...................... .............................12 B. Operational Analysis Methodology .................................................................. .............................12 C. 2009 Existing Conditions Analysis ................................................................ ............................... 13 D. Build Conditions Analysis ............................................................................. ............................... 13 E. Review of Access Locations .......................................................................... ............................... 14 VI. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE ANI) TRANSIT-- ...... ...................... ............................... is A. Bicycle and Pedestrian .................................................................................... .............................15 B. Transit ........................................................................................................... ............................... Nom. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................. .............................20 A. Travel Demand Management Plan ................................................................. ............................... 20 B. Specific Travel Demand Management Strategies .......................................... ............................... 20 Vim. CONCLUSIONS ... ................ ... .... .... .... . ...... > ...................... ............................................ 21 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 - Vicinity Map ........................................................................................... ............................... 4 Figure2 - Concept Site Plan ..................................................................................... ............................... Figure 3 - 2009 Existing Traffic Volumes and Geometrics ....................................... ..................•.•".......10 Figure 4 - Trip Distribution & Assignment ............................................................. ............................... Figure5 - Build Traffic Volumes ............................................................................. 11 .............................16 Figure6 - Pedestrian Facilities ............................................................................... ............................... Figure7 - Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................... ................I.............. 17 Figureo - Bus Route 146 ....................................................................................... ............................... 18 Figure9 - Bus Route 5780 ......................................................................................... .............................19 k L EXECUTIVE S11JNEVLARY The purpose of this Transportation Impact Analysis is to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Colony of Edina senior housing development. The proposed site is located on the south side of Colonial Way in the northwest quadrant of the Highway 62 and Tracy Avenue interchange in Edina, MN. Traffic impacts were analyzed at the following three intersections: Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard 9 Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way Impacts to pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities were also investigated. The proposed site, which is projected to be complete in 2010, consists of a senior care facility with 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living, and memory care, a surface parking lot, an underground parking garage and common areas. Vehicular access to the site will be through two access on Colonial Way. The following summarizes the results of the analysis, as well as additional information presented in the report: The proposed development will generate 32 weekday AM peak hour trips, 55 weekday PM peak hour trips and 437 daily trips. 9 The Existing operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations for the study area intersections. 9 The Build operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations with the inclusion of site - generated traffic. The proposed site accesses are predicted to operate acceptably. 8 No significant impacts to the existing bicycle, pedestrian and transit system are expected. 2 The developer will commit to specific Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies to aid in lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system. > The developer will provide on -site shuttle or van for residents to travel between The Colony of Edina and retail/grocery and entertainment land uses. It is anticipated that the shuttle will make two trips a day. Additionally, the developer will provide a car that will be available to residents to medical appointments. RIK Encorporafed Page 1 of 21 January i r^, zu j The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN 11. PROPOSED DEVER LOPMENT AND STUDY AREA The purpose of this Transportation Impact Analysis is to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Colony of Edina senior housing development. The proposed site is located northwest quadrant of the Highway 62 and Tracy Avenue interchange in Edina, MN. The site is bordered on the north by Colonial Way, on the east by Fire Station #1, on the south by the Highway 62 westbound on -ramp and on the west by an existing pond. The project location is illustrated on Figure 1, the Vicinity Map. The proposed site, which is projected to be complete in 2010, consists of a senior care facility with 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living, and memory care, a surface parking lot, an underground parking garage and common areas. Vehicular access to the site will be through two access on Colonial Way. Figure 2, the Concept Site Plan, shows the layout of the site and proposed access locations. Based on a scoping meeting with the City of Edina, traffic impacts were analyzed at the following three intersections: Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way 9 Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of traffic generated by the proposed development on the operations and safety of the adjacent roadway network. The study will detail the existing and future roadway conditions with the inclusion of the proposed site at studied intersections. Recommendations regarding geometric and/or traffic control needs to accommodate additional Background and site traffic and improve safety are included, as necessary. In addition to traffic related impacts, this Transportation Impact Analysis includes a Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) to outline measures the developer can use to encourage use of alternate modes of travel and enhanced pedestrian friendliness, by providing a balance in the needs of all users of the transportation system. This includes an analysis of pedestrian, bicycle and transit amenities. 00 FLI( Incorporai =d Page L or 21 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN ®20D9 RLK IN J 3 = Q � � � � o v RN�Q SAX ONY qRD, _ W 0 � � dp LESLIE �, - W. 5th ST. v JEFF LA. y Z G� GIR �NiJ Lq � w Q Q A HAW K ° RIDG DR LL DR J � TER. _ E>%R� � KAY MAR QRPIRIE RD. w O� !Yfi 3 p Q �� V D , � R� GIR � �R� �� <f,� 6y WAR E� Q _� Q J �q SGHAEEE A� 46BERNI� ME?, ❑LDGRD � j GROVE z rp GROVE �? ST. Q y Li Li w I � IR SyE CIR. y DR. U] LYLE Q J q> L" Li Lj q Z G cIR RM4A, PM Lj a > CIR. ¢ ¢ = I Q �� 156 �' 0�1NGe RD. ¢ �- BENTON A� — 3 � R �J > COUNTRYSIDE RD, r Ld Q 46, BLAKE w 8(L cy L� � u RIDGE RD, z d o U [ ~ LANDP J�,CvC, Q ¢ `i' Y1 AR�p RD, FOR J OPAL v k! 61sta 4,q HuNTER � 'ft SS . � CIR.0 JEFF T, PL. rd �C ~ BIRCH C 'IC I✓qy SWAY 6 IF11, D I 1 U ❑LINGER BLVD, w z CR �S� r v 0 ASON 158 1990 POP, 46,075 Ll F� �� Z M C' > v <ONIAL J 1 O q ING I1jE /WHIZ HILLS PASS D❑R❑N �� P LA. /V J �P N q CREEK 'VALLEY RD. '' q <<E`( NA��� T��F BALD PROJECT SITE �X��LSiDE �A S- f� S LA. q Q P��Y RD, W`, 66th ST� DR. dl 'A1j Q o O GRACE T R. v� �O c Ld o S� FLBANSpRY �� L ❑IS LA, q q n Li 0 z CI, R Q JP SUSAN > AVE. ¢ H v Z W. 68th ST. 3 = �,NAPEL DR, W �� D R PROJECT LOCATION: O ' Q0o i cr_l J J F- D Q W E HENNEPIN COUNTY CIR. Z c� Q Q = ~ CITY OF EDIWA SCALE IN F o HiUl�aA, D9G N brnn %bl k., INNS Nrnxro��rp�o Phn 952 913 09'2 p F= 9529.1377_9 6120 Bloc U . Dave • 5-. is 20D. I.Sanero-il;+, MN11 55343 THE COLONY OF EDINA 1/ICINITY MAP Figur® $ 1 Pry. 2009087L elan QATR �DzouB rwc ma SENIOR HOUSING (ATTAC1 4W) 40 UNITS ASSISTED/MWIURY CfIRE I- IOUSING 904 UNITS WEST � p v � i r-y S 1 [1 r- TOTAL SITE ACRE x AM �ICiCESS EAST GI A a �1 G� �1 /I Govt S h�jpl't r' fP 1� vugtu91� 5J 6.Im 100 • trL m.>me�G1N 4SN3 ACQiEOS in. EXISTING CONDITIONS Currently, the proposed site is an overflow surface parking lot and an undeveloped wooded area owned by First Colonial Church. Directly across Colonial Way from the site is Countryside Park. A. Data Collection The existing conditions of the nearby roadway system were documented by a field inventory conducted by RLK Incorporated on August 6'h, 2009. The purpose of the inventory was to identify features that affect roadway capacity, including intersection traffic control, lane designations, turn lane storage bay lengths, speed limits, etc. In addition to the field inventory, manual turning movement counts were conducted by ILK on Wednesday, June, 24th, Thursday, June 25� and Tuesday, June 30lb, 2009 from 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM to document existing peak hour traffic volumes at the following intersections: 9 Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way 9 Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard 9 Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way B. Existing Traffic Volumes Review of the turning movement data collected indicates that the peak hour volumes generally occur during the following time periods: Weekday AM Peak Hour: 8:00 to 9:00 AM Weekday PM Peak Hour: 5:00 to 6:00 PM C. Roadway Descriptions Vehicular access to the site from the area is expected to occur primarily on three roadways: Tracy Avenue, Colonial Way and Olinger Boulevard. The following text details the specifics of each of these roadways: 9 Tracy Avenue is a Collector road near the site as it provides access to Highway 62 south of the site and connects to Vernon Avenue north of the site. Tracy Avenue is two lane road that travels north/south in the vicinity of the site and has a posted 30 mph speed limit. Based on 2009 average daily traffic count data (ADT) provided by City of Edina staff, Tracy Avenue carries approximately 7,730 vehicles per day south of Colonial Way. Colonial Way is a local two -lane City road that connects Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue. Currently, there is no ADT data for Colonial way. 9 Olinger Boulevard is functionally classified as a Collector Street. Olinger Boulevard is a two - lane road that travels east/west in the vicinity of the site. Based on 2009 average daily traffic count data (ADT) provided by City of Edina staff, Olinger Boulevard carries approximately 1,879 vehicles per day in the vicinity of the site. RLK incorporated Page 5 of 21 January 19th, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN D. latelr'sezflon De§crtflGRS The following paragraphs provide specific details on the existing configuration of the study area intersections. Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way form a side -street stop - controlled "T" intersection. The eastbound approach is stop - controlled and has a shared left and right turn lane. The northbound approach is free - flowing and consists of a shared left turn and through lane. The southbound approach is free - flowing and is made up of a shared through and right turn lane. > Tracy Avenue & Olinger boulevard is a three - legged all -way stop - controlled "T" intersection The eastbound approach has a shared left and right turn lane. The northbound approach consists of a shared left turn and through lane. The southbound approach is made up of a shared through and right turn lane. > Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way form a side- street stop - controlled "T" intersection The eastbound approach is free - flowing and has a shared through and right turn lane. The westbound approach is free - flowing and consists of a shared left turn and through lane. The northbound approach is stop - controlled and is made up of a shared left and right turn lane. The 2009 existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and existing geometrics for the study area are illustrated on Figure 3. PL€L Incorporated Page 6 of 21 January 19 +h, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN ( 2009 RIJC INQ -- -- -- — P �+ �a—vt-ar AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX PM PEPJ HOUR VOLUMES xxx 1 i (?LjNGER BLVD;. ; ' EXISTING ROADWAY LASTING I-ANr A, EXISTING STOP CONTROL mop- '` �, , �% O�"�` ,1'•.i \-1 'Tr.T't +Nf.e r i��� t t{ I 5 4 Alp 4W N 3 l� E , .1 ` se O Y..V 4 �• •.ice- i It' 1 : '!. M,'f}� tl� s_ t , z :. i T a• '+Ilw `.. SCALE IN FEFT o ..o N 6 A THE COLONY OF EDINA C4 RIN7, � Phvae 952 4B3 m I�mc 4 �33 A 1 ri'J 20 09 EXISTING IOLI,aMES & GEOMETRIC X V— +, 3 a87L W. PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation The proposed development will have 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living, and memory care. Table 1 shows the breakdown of the units and associated number of beds. Table Il i Init Breakdown unit M� - - Quan't Beds One Bedroom 21 21 One Bedroom /Den 22 22 Two Bedroom 24 48 Two Bedroom /den 10 20 Three Bedroom 5 15 Care suites 10 10 Memory Support 28 28 Affordable One Bedroom 30 30 Totals 150 194 Based on information from the developer, it is anticipated to have 194 patient beds with a 95 -97% occupancy rate. The volume of vehicle trips generated by the proposed development has been estimated for the weekday AM and PM peak hours and on a daily basis using the data and methodologies contained in the 8'h Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The estimated volume of site- generated trips for the proposed development is summarized in Table 2. The Assisted Living Land Use Code (254) is assumed for the entire development as it encompasses all the types of proposed units and corresponds to the land use description detailed in Trip Generation. Table 2 Trin C',PnPratinn Estimatesl. 1. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation. 8 Edition, published by rrE. 2. 194 total beds are proposed with a predicted 97% occupancy rate, resulting in 189 occupied beds, per data provided by the developer. 3. The ITE fitted curve equation was used based on the location of data points and higher amount of studies for daily traffic. 4. ADT represent the Average Daily Traffic over a typical weekday 24 hour period. B. Trip Distribiilltion and R_ssig-onnseat The distribution of site - generated trips to and from the adjacent street system was based on existing and expected future traffic patterns in the area for both the AM and PM peak hours. This distribution pattern, along with the estimated changes in traffic volumes at study area intersections expected as a result of the proposed redevelopment, are illustrated on Figure 4, Trip Distribution & Assignment. i P FZLK Incorporated Page 8 of 21 January r Zulu The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN ITE Land Use Code Size rips Generated: Lard Use AM Peak PM Peak Wee ay Rate In Out Rate In Out hate ADT4. Assisted Living 254 189 occupied BedS2. 0.17 23 9 0.29 29 26 NA'- 437 Totals 23 9 29 2L 439 32 d 55 1. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation. 8 Edition, published by rrE. 2. 194 total beds are proposed with a predicted 97% occupancy rate, resulting in 189 occupied beds, per data provided by the developer. 3. The ITE fitted curve equation was used based on the location of data points and higher amount of studies for daily traffic. 4. ADT represent the Average Daily Traffic over a typical weekday 24 hour period. B. Trip Distribiilltion and R_ssig-onnseat The distribution of site - generated trips to and from the adjacent street system was based on existing and expected future traffic patterns in the area for both the AM and PM peak hours. This distribution pattern, along with the estimated changes in traffic volumes at study area intersections expected as a result of the proposed redevelopment, are illustrated on Figure 4, Trip Distribution & Assignment. i P FZLK Incorporated Page 8 of 21 January r Zulu The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN C. Build Traffic Volumes The Build scenario volumes result when the trip assignment volumes are combined with the 2009 existing traffic volumes, as detailed in Figure 5. R!K incorporated Page 9 of 21 January I,/-, zu 1 u The Colony of Edina - Edina, NON 2009 RUC INC. ooYn � - °S 4 Q u v] 0 E I 'n P' R J c i u u r ; 1 in It .: (V 00 ( - � Ua1mh.1HN g am,►aap, Mta o fihcue 952 S 0]977 llhT 9l 1" Ll.L�9 CZIl7 0 6210 DI'm Cucl� Q';:wc � Suka NO , 61Qiawecwn A'R +3 -- -- LEGEND AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS xxx PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS StltPt 0' ROADWAY LANES STOP CONTROL :.. DISTRIBUTION AM % /PM% t i w 6 14 0 o I • � - as Qa i :•!. i+ i o° �p d. 10 4 to G+ ! , Q 200 �r. 1 a S ALE IN FEET THE COLONY OF EDINA TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT Project X009087! LEGEND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES xxx PM PEAK 11DUR VOLUMES E ND ROADWAY BL. LANES STOP CONTROL V52 WO 13 QT� V23 10 24 14 4 G 14 10B 05V 5 7 OD IV 12—e 10 5 4 cv m-j QD ip 14 0 0 (IV 50 J, C3 ca u oil. t� 1 PROJECT Iq cl 200 ak F GALC 11 FEET CL mmmmmwmm� lu rn THE COLONY OF EDINA RIX I%= 952 933 um Fm. 9529335953 BUILD l!AFFIC VOLUMES ACC 0971- V. RESULTS OF TBE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS A. Traffic Forecast Scenarios The following two scenarios were considered in evaluating traffic operations near the site: 2009 Existing Conditions. Based on the field inventory of roadway conditions and existing turning movement counts. Build Alternative. This alternative assumes full development of the site with completion by 2010. No background growth is expected on the roadway network as the surrounding neighborhood is fully developed. B. Operational Analysis Methodology Traffic operations for the AM and PM peak hour conditions within the study area were analyzed using the industry- standard Synchro /SimTraffic 6 software package, which uses the data and methodology contained in the 2000 HiEhwgy CUacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as traffic signals and stop - controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volumes on that facility. Various factors affect capacity, including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number and width of travel lanes, intersection control, etc. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in the 2000 Highway CUacity Manual (HCM). The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter designations from "A," representing the best operating conditions, to "F," representing the worst. In general, LOS "E" is the minimally acceptable condition during the peak periods of the day. At intersections, the letter grades are assigned based on the average delay per vehicle experienced during the peak hour on a particular approach or movement. The grade for the intersection as a whole is based on a weighted average of each movement. Table 3, below, details the ranges for each letter grade for unsignalized intersections, in seconds of average delay per vehicle. 'Fable 3 Level of Service vs. Average Lela - Unsignalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 0 -10 B 10-15 C 15-25 D 25-35 E 35-50 g 50 —and Lip -Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Kesearch tsoarn. A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the lineup of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable level of RLK incorporated Page 12 of 21 January 19th, 2010 The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. The 95`' percentile queue, or the length of queue with a 5% chance of occurring during the peak hour, is considered the standard for design purposes. C. 2009 Existing Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the existing conditions. Tables 4a and 4b show the results of the Build Conditions analysis. Table 4a R exults of Existing Conditions Analysis — AM Peak Hour Intersection revel of Service l. 95`� Percentile Queue Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. NBL/T queue of 33'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard A/A(SBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A ML M22uate queue lengths. 1. Overall LOS followed by the worst movement LOS reported from SimTraYbc. 2. 95i' percentile queues reported from SimTrafHc Table 4b lzPs„ lts of F.xictina C'nnditions Analysis — PM Peak Hour Intersection Sevel a 95`b Percentile Queues Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A L Adequate queue lengths. NBIJT queue of 44'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard AB (NBT) AdeQuate ueue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A (NBL) AdE2uate queue lengths. Operations of the Existing roadway network are acceptable. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS is B or better and all 95th percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. The interactions between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection were investigated to determine if any traffic problems exist as these two intersections are only 400 feet apart. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial. Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 956 percentile queues of 33 feet in the AM peak hour and 44 feet in the PM peak hour. No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. No improvements are recommended for the Existing Conditions. D. Build Conditions Analysis This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses for the Build conditions. Tables 5a and 5b show the results of the existing conditions analysis. � (60 PLIC Incorporated Page 13 of 21 January IY11, 1Y11, ZULU The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN Table 5a a e ,.t +� f 1:i -;iA rnnriitinnc A nslvcis — AM Peak Hour iw�uau later-section Level of Service�L- 95`h Percentile Queues2' Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. NBL/T Sueue of 44'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard A/A (SBT) Adequate Adequate queue lengths. queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Wa A/A (NBL) Adequate A/A (NBL) queue lengths. Colonial Way & West Access A/A (NBL Adequate, queue lengths. Colonial Wa & East Access A/A ML ) Ad uate ueue len s. 1. overall LOS followed by the worst movement LOS reported from SimTrainc. 2. 95f° percentile queues reported from SimTraffic Table 5b R u It f Build Conditions Anal sis — PM Peak Hour es s o Intersection Level of Service 950' Percentile Queues Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way A/A (NBL) Ad ate queue lengths. N"BLJT queue of 53'. Tracy Avenue & Olinger Boulevard A/B (NBT) Adequate queue lengths. Olinger Boulevard & Colonial Way A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & West Access A/A (NBL) Adequate queue lengths. Colonial Way & East Access A/A (NBL) Ade uate ou eue lengths. Analysis of the Build Conditions indicated acceptable operations on the roadway network and proposed site accesses. For both the AM and the PM peak hours, overall intersection and worst movement LOS is B or better and all 95a' percentile queues are accommodated by the existing roadway geometry. Individual movement LOS for the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection is A during both the AM and PM peak hours with 950i percentile queues of 44 feet in the AM peak hour and 53 feet in the PM peak hour. No adverse interactions occur between the northbound left turn at the Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way intersection and the Tracy Avenue and TH 62 Westbound Ramp intersection. If northbound left tum operational and queuing problems arise in the future due to growth in background traffic, it is recommended that this portion of Tracy Avenue be re- striped by the City to provide a dedicated northbound left turn lane onto Colonial Way. No mitigation measures are recommended for the Build Conditions. E. Review of Access Locations The proposed site includes two accesses, a west access that serves the surface parking lot and the east access that serves that underground parking garage and the service dock. The separation of the two accesses is approximately 330 feet and there is adequate site distance for entering/exiting vehicles. We do not anticipate any operational issues with the proposed accesses as Colonial Way is a low volume road. The Build operational analysis indicates acceptable Level of Service results and adequate queue lengths that do not extend into other access points or intersections. RLK incorporated Page 14 of 21 Dui iuw y 17 U The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN `L PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT The proposed site is located across the street from a park with pedestrian trails and sidewalks and near two bus routes. These pedestrian and transit amenities, suggest the site is ideally situated to facilitate alternative modes of transportation. A. Bkyele and Pedestrian As shown on Figure 6, Pedestrian Facilities, concrete sidewalks are provided along study area roadways. The proposed project will incorporate new sidewalks from the building to the existing sidewalk system on the south side of Colonial Way. Figure 7, Bicycle Facilities, illustrates the nearby bicycle facilities. Good access to the pedestrian and bicycle systems from the proposed. project will encourage employee and visitor use. 13. Transit Numerous transit stops and a Metro Transit Park & Ride lot are located near the site. Existing transit route 146, detailed on Figure S, travels from Downtown Minneapolis to Edina with stops near the site on Colonial Way. Existing transit route 578, illustrated on Figure 9, travels from Downtown Minneapolis to Edina and the Southdale Mall with stops near the site on Colonial Way. The proximity of access to the transit system adjacent to the proposed project makes this a viable alternative for employees, visitors and residents. A6c- RLK Incorporated Page 15 of 1 i The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN 2009 RLX IMC. 0 .2 EIR 7T- �i 4-7, L.'e� . I LI it � F31 M-119 IM LO D illZ " MM LEGENC,. E�jsbrig N-0;26--j SdIvil I P Q S=d' Sd-.%vafv Rldwalk Bushm SideLvalk t�Dts: PafirPaftaya am inDfudk on Rgura MI 0 U 'gA ' e CIII-- of Edina vva, I k F a f I'[ tI &17 Plan UpdA6 F[gurs 7.10 E ,I — H=NN �2 MN C> "=n N RLK odiftm ry; CWIMMMIED ?r.. 952 933 0972 F= 952 933 1153 6110 Bh= O-J DAve - Su 103 NN 55343 tME COLON-Y OF -EDINA PEDESTROAN FAA UMES Projecl 2C,C9,O87L D D 0 L) U 9 ,52009 RLX INC. IT 7— IT U: 7--) 0 Ir 16 l �: .......... ra r 7 rA T -A Ev Tilt F I- PROJEC j" �-T IA. -t5. r + L J-1 E�dst rG &ahj Hantispin PmpoWd FvbFm the 2007 Edlmt-umD4�n&& BlgjYolaTF.UPWdL9R Plea LEGEKD: 3th PaTk ps�jlvm County Comdofs Park Pa WaY I Nmary-Rc&.- Smndary-Rouia Comprehenskift Piari Updab 81tycle Faciflifies Figure 7J' AC" THE COLONY OF E—GOINA BICYCLE FACUIES Fr l�,-G -T 7 Proj&ct iF 20090087L I-L-M Lab% MN M -- MN RLK- amakm Fb—. 952 933 0972 F— 9529331153 6110 Bh. r-,; .s Di S•x:i-- 100 em BEN 55343 81tycle Faciflifies Figure 7J' AC" THE COLONY OF E—GOINA BICYCLE FACUIES Fr l�,-G -T 7 Proj&ct iF 20090087L a 0 0 0 6N 2009 RU( 114C. • PROJECT -91, -: qt MN M1,19p& JAN 04 RLK I,-Q Pbo= 952 933 0972 Pm 952 9331153 6110 Bjw Circle Auve a 5.jw 100 - N53=cLa1w, MN 55343 pal E S Miles 5-11t.'. SI r Remo., A�n A 181111161114 �vr A 15 \r 0 My 11HE COLONY OF EDINA, BUS ROUTE 146 F1.11m A 8 Prolgat P) 2009087L WF7),� 14Z -1 ....... 1-35W Lake Street Metro transit Routes: .,A /P 04 cl D i O9 :i PLmihst-6 - am) at. home c J ;;,OILS VVTA Routes: J� 1) %dwhownl Cc4hi GentaK Ilyn 351h4t Minneapolis Downtown Zone Ride in the Do)�Ijjown zone for 50a. A2nd St A4111, AKL L IIARRIC-7 ASTh Soulh r sl Ime qW hburn I I l— a 52fxJ 51 crien P. 4 M) 1 filki"10 : V.41h Sq 5-11t.'. SI r Remo., A�n A 181111161114 �vr A 15 \r 0 My 11HE COLONY OF EDINA, BUS ROUTE 146 F1.11m A 8 Prolgat P) 2009087L 2000 RLIt INC. Minneapolis Downtown Zone Ride in the Downtown Zone for 50¢. 0 Y n n V 0 i 0 0 C U u J i V 0 � L PROJECT SITE 11erilaoa br G5;1� SI u w ' C t 66th S: Fcr3iei� "` — RG iv '° Soulhdale 11L ShopppIng Genler dnuunn 59tl1 SI 7Uh St ornxrnwrn—m 1 MT11 o - -_ AM,* Dow 'ro`III�Pfui °I `$palWI I 13 I mS i i 1-35N/ &Lake S1ree1 J. Metro 71aisiL Rcdes: I sI Q"' =rent In `•.ry � T� SEA Sa? �� � I '. I i ITgA,rRobies: G 1 1 1 I-ake 4 CAL HOUN ^1 I s al U' M cl I 1 OL 42noSl Mlles Soulhdols LAKE Transit Center HAR141ET Mo7o Trarsi: Roulss Gri V'ttr r 1, _ — GI M - Bet. -e Routes w For addllianal ice, 5114 Nletru. please sae no a 146 wl� Be n Ave ~ NI 14,11 Goionial�Y`ay 17 119 r 7fr/R�M�E* 6�-2,'.. — �C4h 5t to ��111111111©Ir�lUr 1 t970D S /Inrt�111111N111111N1111111110 — iG -15. '• WCL: cI mI¢v cl n•Or Dew—/ LIIj,U Ixc f >e x 11111i 17 mill t 76Ih -_ - �ev119 tinnc�oh G p'!t' r Minnesota Drive \\�49 and Fro nDo Ave Matto Transit Routes. i • ;, gel iae Route' L nd I r � {t0 la c Pnrk Roserva I- .;•- .::r•na�7ty w i N �" MN THE COLONY OF EDINA r Phu°c 952933 0972 Fm 952 93311 BL ROUTE 575 3 � yr@Tr rliri � _- .__ AA T r, Sidi 9 - r r,• - 1 2. 187 �I Y. It R AVEN L D1✓NLkND MANAGEMENT PLAID A. Travel Demand Management Plan The purpose of this Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) is to assist the City of Edina to achieve their transportation goals as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan as they relate specifically to The Colony of Edina site, by managing and minimizing the vehicle trips generated by the development. The Colony of Edina site is predicted to generate a low volume of site - generate traffic with minimal TDM needs, therefore specific travel demand strategies have been developed. B. Sgecifle Travel Demand Management Strategies The Colony of Edina seeks to achieve the City of Edina's goal of enhancing the local transportation system by lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system The Colony of Edina agrees to implement of the following measures: General 1. Provide informational displays on an bulletin board or kiosk detailing current transit schedules and bike maps. 2. Require truck and/or service deliveries to occur outside of weekday peak traffic times. This does not include FedEx / UPS -type deliveries. 3. Encourage the use of alternate commuting options by dissemination of information to residents, visitors and employees. Transit 1. The developer shall consider transit incentives for employees, such a discounted transit pass. 2. The employer, when possible, shall work with employees to provide flexible work schedules to coordinate with transit schedules and to minimize peak hour vehicular trip generation. 3. The developer shall provide an on -site shuttle or van for residents to travel between The Colony of Edina and retail/grocery and entertainment land uses. It is anticipated that the shuttle will make two trips a day. Additionally, the developer shall provide a car that will be available to residents to medical appointments. Bicycle The developer shall provide bike racks and locker storage facilities for personal belongings for employees that bike to work. Pedestrian 1. Rebuild sidewalks impacted by construction with ADA- compliant curb ramps, encouraging use by a broad cross - section of pedestrian types, and promoting the pedestrian mode of commuting for employees who are nearby residents. 2. Construct and maintain lighted private sidewalks connecting the building accesses to the public sidewalk. RLK incorporated Page 20 of 21 Jul luul r The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN V111 CONCLUSIONS The preceding analysis has evaluated the potential traffic impacts associated with The Colony of Edina development on the operations to the study area roadway and intersections. Travel Demand Management measures are detailed that the developer agrees to implement to aid in lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system. The following summarizes the results to the analysis, as well as additional information presented in the report: 9 The proposed development will generate 32 weekday AM peak hour trips, 55 weekday PM peak hour trips and 437 daily trips. The existing roadway network is predicted to easily handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed site. The Existing operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations for the study area intersections. > The Build operational analysis indicates acceptable traffic operations with the inclusion of site - generated traffic. 9 The proposed site accesses are predicted to operate acceptably. No significant impacts to the existing bicycle, pedestrian and transit system are expected. 9 The developer will commit to specific Travel Demand Management (TDW strategies to aid in lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to balance the needs of all users of the transportation system. Di a R!K incorporated Poge 21 of 21 January i yin, ru i u The Colony of Edina - Edina, MN AL WSB infrastructure a Engineering rt Planning a Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South & ASSOCiClff, Inc. Suite #300 Minneapolis, M16V 85416 Tel: 763 541 -4600 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Way me Houle, P13, Public Works Director/Cify Engineer .Tack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck laic &art, PH, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: January 11, 2010 Re: The Colony of Edina Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Edina WSBPrcjectN0- 16036 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis for The Colony of Edina, a new Senior housing development on Colonial Way west of Tracy Avenue adjacent to TH 62. Based oii our review of the Traffic Impact Analysis we offer the following comments. The Trip Generation rates used in Table 1 were based on 189 occupied beds (95% occupancy) using the Assisted Living ITE rate category. The description of the proposed facility indicates that the facility will include 150 apartments ranging from independent living units, assisted living units and memory care units. What is the breakdown of each of these unit types? The independent living units will have a higher traffic generation. This should be outlined more clearly. 2. No information is provided with respect to the interaction between the Colony Way and TH 62 lamp intersections on Tracy Avenue. What is the lane geometry on Tracy Avenue between these intersections? With an existing ADT on Tracy Ave of 7,700, turn lanes at these intersections may be warranted, especially with an additional 500 + vehicles being added from the proposed site turning on to and off of Tracy Avenue. The analysis results indicate that all intersection will operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) on an overall basis. What about the turning vehicles, what is the left Lam LOS at the Tracy Avenue intersections? The analysis also indicates that the 95% queue lengths are adequate. What are they? How do they compare with the existing vehicle storage available? Are there ai-iy issues / conflicts with the TH 62 intersection? RRrp% IY J G'1Ent — ^ *g1G ea11C Su=ud6'_00 Cdnnid W.3'',Tnffic P i.V:V 001 t2 \ ;'S3_Cbu3_Ri�:uf_ine Cot-Y P—ie ADC Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina January 11, 2010 Page 2 of 2 4. Electronic and hard copies of the Synchro / SimTraffic files should be provided to the City for review. 5. The Site should be shown on the Pedestrian Facilities, Bicycle Facilities and- Transit maps. How does the site connect to these facilities? 6. The Traffic Generation numbers reported in the Executive Summary do not match those in Table 1 or the Conclusions. This should be clarified. Based on these comments and my review of the Traffic Impact Analysis, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. /0"�\ ltl-�K Engineering • Landscape Architecture • Planning . Surveying • Traffic INCORPORATED � extraordinary CUMMUnftist TO: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer COPY: Jay Jensen, Shelter Corporation FROM: Katie Bruwelheide, P.E. Vern Swing, P.E. DA'Z'E: January 19`x, 2010 R-E: Response to City Comments from 01 -11 -10 The Colony of Edina >-,K Project Igo. 2009- 087 -L whoule @ct edina mn us jsullivan@ci. edina mn, us jay@sheltercorp.com kbi-wvelheida@j-Ikinc.com vswing@a -ikinc.com The following comments by the City of Edina, dated January 11, 2010, have been received and addressed by RLK. RLK's comments and actions are in italics after each comment. The Trip Generation rates used in Table 1 were based on 189 occupied beds (95% occupancy) using the Assisted Living ITE rate category. The description of the proposed facility indicates that the facility will include 150 apartments ranging from independent living units, assisted living units and memory care units. What is the breakdown of each of these unit types? The independent living units will have a higher traffic generation. This should be outlined more clearly. A table with the breakdown of units has been added to page 8. The trip generation classification and traffic volumes have not been changed as the description of the Assisted Living Land Use (254), described in TTE's 8h Edition of Tiz,2 Generation, encompasses all types of units proposed for this development. The Assisted Living Land Use descriptions states "the rooms in these facilities may be private or shared accommodations, consisting of either a single room or a small apartment -style unit with a kitchenette and living space ". The proposed independent living units are considered to be apartment style units with kitchenettes and, therefore, considered to be within the Assisted Living Land Use. 2. No information is provided with respect to the interaction bet\veen the Colony Way and TH 62 Ramp intersections on Tracy Avenue. What is the lane geometry on Tracy Avenue between these intersections? With an existing ADT on Tracy Ave of 7,700, L'; Offices: Duluth , Ham Lake Hibbing - Minnetonka . Oakdale (952) 933-0972 . 6110 Slue Grcle Drive • Suite 100 . Minnetonka, MN 55343 ® FAX (952) 933-1153 Equal G�7parfunify Enrliloyer turn lanes at these intersections may be warranted, especially with an additional 500 + vehicles being added from the proposed site turning on to and off of Tracy Avenue. Less than 500 daily vehicle trips (less than 250 vehicles) are anticipated with the development of the site. Only 437 vehicle trips are expected on a daily basis per the trip generation estimates. Of these 437 vehicle trips, appr•oxirnately 37% during the AM peak hour and 61 % during the PM peak hour are predicted to travel to /from the south (1. e. TH 62 Ramps) per Figure 4 in the M. With the existing ADT on Tracy Avenue and the addition of approximately 250 daily trips turning onto and off of Tracy Avenue at Colonial Way, tun lanes this intersection are not warranted. A more detailed discussion of LOS and queuing has been added to the results of existing and Build conditions. It is suggest that if northbound left turn operational and queuing problems arise in the future due to growth in background traffic, this portion of Tracy Avenue be re- striped by the City to provide a dedicated northbound left turn lame onto Colonial Way. 3. The analysis results indicate that all intersection will operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) on an overall basis. 'What about the turning vehicles, what is the left turn LOS at the Tracy Avenue intersections? The analysis also indicates that the 95% queue lengths are adequate. What are they? How do they compare with the existing vehicle storage available? Are there any issues / conflicts with the TH 62 intersection? Individual LOS and queuing results have been added to the results tables for both the Existing and Build conditions on pages 13 curd 14. Discussion points have also been added after the results tables. No issues or conflicts are anticipated with the TH 62 intersection. 4. Electronic and hard copies of the Synchro / SimTraffic files should be provided to the City for review. Hard copies of the Synchro/SinzTraffic results have been included in the appendix of the M. Electronic copies of the Synchro files are being sent with this response. 5. The Site should be shown on the Pedestrian Facilities, Bicycle Facilities and Transit maps. How does the site connect to these facilities? The site location has been shown of the Pedestrian Facilities, Bicycle Facilities and Transit maps. As stated in the TL4 on page 15, the proposed project will incorporate new sidewalks from the building to the existing sidewalk system on the south side of Colonial Way. 6. The Traffic Generation numbers reported in the Executive Summary do not match those in Table 1 or the Conclusions. This should be clarified. The traffic generation numbers in the Executive Sunnzary have been updated to match those in Table 1 and the Conclusions. GAShrher Corporsdon\2009- 087 -L \_Correspondence \TrafficRmponse to City Comments 01- 18- 10.doc � (If � RLK Incorporated Poge 2 of 2 January 19, 2010 The Colony of Edina 2009 -087 -M Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission O � � Item IV. B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORTRECOMMEKDATION T o., Transportation Commissioners F=rofn: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Data: January 21, 2010 Subject: Transportation Impact analysis — 6200 Colonial Way — The Colony of Edina e�`E . -- (_, RsCam,Mendaticn Agenda Item NO.: P\,jc 11 ACTON ❑ [Liform-ation Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by RLK revised on January 19, 2010, review memo dated January 11, 2010 from WSB and associates and response memo from RLK dated January 19, 2010. Staff and WSB have reviewed the response memo from RLK dated January 19, 2010 and believe the development team has met our requirement s. [f so des-ired by the Transportation ��i�r�i�.�iar�s adapt a motion recommen-ding that th,c- Transportation Study for 6200 Cc[cnfall «ay doss 1-lot advseaeCy affect th'e adjacsr�t tr-anapertaticn ayastsm At the time this report was submitted to the Edina Transportation Commission there were a few outstanding items staff was requiring of the Development Team prior to making a recommendation. See the following italic text stating state's recommendation as of January 1 5, 2010. voo-= =----------- = =o -o- =000a= Review Me attached transpoi-tation impact arjaiysis submitted by RLK dated glove l ber 9, 20,09 and review a memo dated January 11, 2010 from, acrd Associafes. G:\ Eng in eerin,�\lnfrastructure\Sttet \Trafc \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100121_6200_Co] oni a1_Way_Traffic_Study_REV-iSED.doc Pale 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. B. Currently staff and our traffic consultant V ✓SB feel that this transportation submittal is not ye complete. Staff, VVSB and RLK are working to resolve the outstanding items listed in the attached memo prior to the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on January 21, 2010. Currently the conditions of the approval are: 1. This development shall address ail comments in V✓SB's January 21, 2010 memo to the satisfaction of the ETC and Engineering department. rharatdre staf, is with -haid n,g a reccciienerTdatcErI, Co thIS prOISCt P417dI1T9 th's rssc[Lr�fcer at the c utsfarldeng 1sau-35o The ------------ Staff received oae proposal for a senior care facility with 150 apartments ranging from independent living, assisted living and memory care on the site of an existing parking lot and vacant land located east of the Colonial Church on the south side of Colonial Way. The Development Team was required to analyze intersection operations at Tracy Ave. � Colonial Way, Tracy Ave. CO-- Olinger Blvd. and Olinger Blvd. & Colonial Way. G:\Enaineering\Infrzstructi relStreets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Aeendas\2010 R& R\ 20100121_ 6200_ Col onia l_Way_Trafnc_study_REVISED.doc A C��INNUZ ES � F THE �q1r� Cdtnia Transportrattonu Comii fssuon o e Thursday, January 21, 2010 ® Edina City Hall 4801 West 50�' Street Council Chambers 7BBB MEMBERS PRESENT: Geof Worldnglers Jennifer Janovy9 Tom SonncviKes Jean Schlroeders Jul1a Sierks MEMBERS ABSENT- Warren Plante, Usha; AbI rannovit:z STAFF PRESENT- S Jacku[[ivan9 6�roniCison = L. Ca[[ to Order - -- _ a. Chairman Comments b. (community Comments Bone. [it. Approval of FWhid�s a. Reg utaf atincg of October and December 17, 2009 IV. New Business _ == .H =X 69::_ Brd' `Rgf adl [ntercha€ � [�rescntat[on C6[:an:� of Edfb.a — 6200 Colonial Way - - _.. Ass}std city engineer,: Sullivan -- ;staid discussion began in 2008 on this 150 apartment 10 beds) - development for th_e= :site located west of Tracy Avenue and north of the Crosstown (behind`t.h_e,_new fire station -) Theusite is currently being used as a parking lot by Colonial Church. He ,_said the developers were asked to study the intersections at Tracy Avenue -o.:: Olinger Blvd; 'racy Avenue. :,_Lcoloniai Way; and the area from the Crosstown entry /exit ramps Lip to Tracy Avenue & Co:lon�ial Way. fir. Sullivan said after review, .it vas determined that these locations world continue to operate at level of service A & B. Additionally, Mr. Sullivan said the developers were asked to respond to six issues, all of which have been addressed satisfactorily. One of the issues included the stretch of .road from Crosstown to Tracy Avenue. The concern was with cars stacking while waiting to make a Left turn to go onto Colonial Way. It was determined that there would be enough gaps between vehicles to prevent stacking. However= should this become an issue in the future, Mr. Sullivan said Tracy Avenue is wide enough to accommodate a left turn lane. Mr. Jay Jensen with The Waters Senior Livings Minnetonka, MKI, spoke on behalf of the development team. He explained that a similar development was, done in Eden Prairie with underground parking of 70 stalls, most of which are empty. With an average age of 86, Mr. Jensen said majority of the residents are no longer driving. He said the Edina site will have 100 underground parking stalls for residents and employees with 80 surface parking spots. He said traffic generation will be minimal and will be mostly from visitors in off -peak hours. He said the facility will have a van to take residents on day trips, and a couple cars to drive them to appointments. In regards to the church losing a parking lot, Mr. Jensen said a parking study was conducted and the church will continue to have sufficient parking for Sunday services, plus a cross easement will be established so that they can use the 80 surface parking spots. Additionally, Mr. Jensen said they will offer incentive for the 75 employees to use public transit (the area is served by two buses with a park and ride conveniently located- -across the street). After discussion, Commissioner Bonneville motioned accept. -tafps recommendation as follow and the motion was seconded by Coimmiss oner White.:- = __ "lf so desired by the TransportatE&i.: Commission, adapt .. a motion recommending that the 4'an- P Gila t1G*VPP/A,/ traffic--for 6200 Colonial Way does not adversely affect the adjacent &:j sportaf ah- system." At Commissioner Janovy's recommendation 'Transpottafion Study'was struck from the motion and replaced with 'traffic." All voted aye. Motion passed. C . Trans portation-G-pni omission ftle iJ:DevelOR -_ Review d. Small Area; - Pawning_= Process Presentation V Planning Conhill-mission Update (Cori mis9 oner Schroeder) Vl. Bike Edina TasklF i•c Updatei -C iss.loner Janovy) vil. Staff_Lia�s�n- Goera�nents =.:: a Southw6if ransit.%" Route 3A b. NTMP Deadline - Vill. AdjoL-rn,ment. �(t(0 N P3101OV19 to smsesim. 4TIK tees uss PC oil trrs acts r sits . SON 4- PF - 7 Q*7 �• � r � "• 'if. � �,7• IA '� f 1. �� •F�y'14 r_�`� f �• .fit ,,;�„1 wil Iv AA • � _ .�.. - .. Fi � r� :. . .lei , _ .r� � � �� .. � � ' �, I r.7 •,�,r. ru v Mir low . - 1 - =. i - _ - _ '7 ..• ��� v _ 1� � .+ .r. r �'- -• vi . %,rclhf' a � .fit ♦ ' 1 0•� � 4-7 .�• to rr ,y f 71V _ "7 ..�. � •, 't yam^, �� F,`�1. �` .'"'��� � ,I � j,. -.. ice+.. : ti.•z� -.� � _ ' • 1 •.-R r r �.� '7 ; 1. :(c.'` � � •�� N ;(, ' � � , t t ' 1: {, '"' , .y�-0 J a ':�: f�',� f� :, f,` )..,;. ... � , , i• r�:�1 x� r 3 '' � '� _qr {� t � "r.1f1 .. 't i ' J �} �� +�� �- . � 'iy 41 ,,�, 1: � r , . r �� ` NYt_ �; •� 1,4,,A �' +y ,,-r� w As Ift Im IftL h' .An 4140 r YORK lop", MI. At ka 5716 5;20 P[ 5124 t• , 57 - 5425 t 5124 132 J i 31 13 di 10 d r, •1 R n M. 'A Off1 r, 5203 _ 5201 5208 5209 .• `y jY. '" l'' 5209 713° dik 5271 ° !,223 {/'s i /,� 53RD ST W 5300 � � s uoo�fwraaus 1 ��►���� IS '51 1.r-, 1691" TERR, Y r� 'x -y►, I Op t.! 4i' !! j ,. "YR � � rr, i LN I AN fir, .�, i it LL LL LL trFt I r� ) LL c« Will ..+ OF 240A 1 l .. p°44 00 iOJe -• - to � «��g + r w'7Fay+�.m -,� :.:�+b' fi nl;. .� � { - � r , iqe . C?.: r'1 �t w,- :: _�.,c'•.r -- - -•` — - , W } �� `• is - i . l _ y f !rw I .1 l " ;J ►,. , V6RWsN T1RR, J, A 5200 5157 .S1M.51325128 31205776 5112 5713 t,, t : ,1 e 5151 5113 C9L1 •S1S8164 5148 t .- 518.0 113. 5117 •. 5120 � { b -. � • � b. 5176 5111 1 $121 512 ;15:5189 ..�;? 17. 1I3 5129 5721 .D t S 1 -o �51LB 51281.r Sibi �. 3136 Y .a ,17 51 L057 51 $1W' 1 '' t 1809 iLi, -1157 $149 . 12 4' 490! 5276 5272.5208 2 5108 r'� E s 1 ,4 rT r. e906 -• < e t 4913 4909 4905 825 '.,t,l.- •t. ..4 � � 1 1 - ' y�_ l r" 821 4908 x817 1904 +1820 _ tr 901 1; �'^ �- -. i .: s. .sw•. Sri 4912 1 •1 4 '"�i ti. t 1•� �_ 09 4404 ` 7. 4973 4900 4405 200 �:. •P. ''• .'4't .4�i',a• N�` _ i •� %5' < "'1 1. r j' ,• o �s r '49 t i q i c4 ,o :E ?4t:;,a 7210 - i. ' =t.� r _• rSA a '.� _ 4 4 72 �0 is r`�- •��!.= � +-r 1220 21 7:00 !.. a.,o9 GJO� 4901 <b ! [ --as 57►L�y� r i ' Y � � ryt us: o. •a. 11y.ls.0 -^9'r ivll l-� %.S PO' Wllc 6RAMEACY j fig FO �FT 9•r Viz; .• " �,'!'� s! Alh HE gail . rat :�• �� - k. e4t•� 7 �. fsf;' w• r � 7t r • - - • A: s 414 F. . y+•{t r r''rs - a x,F "��;'g9ww�A A"�oy� � � a y P � y y� -;a e.} '^�'ft `t� • iy- 9� sr f�'b �� � �tA �,• �..�r .. f633 9, c- ti...-. -'m.: 1., /Ctf 57'.._.... .. t a9n0. d 4C'T d6I7 49n4 .. LODO 40GS 10J31C;L }: 3cay %945 91 L: 3937 3921 3923 T _ . 4905h 49D1 f9 G908• ', -4g09 4912 901 4905 4915 fi39a8 99d0-J9f01� -y3936 f� 3D3D �D•s 45161 49n6 Q907 f916 D 6 49.7 .� ' Al =M A-! 1. ._t^ Icr e, e4 49D8� 1909 1910 10921 7 1911. 4924 4925 '4`'' C 4972 4915 -vl� - a1:dT I r�24 24 e.3915 c J 49}6 -932 4937 c200 4 '�.' aT 00 y30 k 4 f9.0 1919 290 47T 09 4201 i 3139 " 7917 * °�' M� coos r y - 31,39 - Snn6 5n08 } 5009 400 �F 5010 � r:•C.. 1 � 5 1.5 5000 �F t � . � _ �U34 r SD7J5072 5013 - }r +: SU£9 t. 5028r ''i "�d•'wr: -... I� 'F � fr 601 , 10 SD 17 - _ 5D50 v 105 1 - 510a J5101 —1 T = y 03, 5 701 1 S 1 ! }J. 15112 7 1 51D<' 117 = 5176 109 `T08 •s 5 712 r - T/J � n t 5120 it 1114 a 5117 5117 ra:,112 I T' , 51 312; A. - C 1 7 5121 _120 1 t ,n 0 usa ..erlwawais.emr'arroi+a�sea�ons 1 3/J 125 s12J � %_1- —i.. "•i,.. Si `% t Neu FAX 4� 1 CIO, Rkh, r. .f J 1 ••wNnp "- 1z'r► C r -N.>�M k fd LIN NIL Ilk ,lG c.T •. �"�vAt �w 1i 7 .f l : �.,;7p�t+�'ii' w _ w r 7N, , NA GLA 7z Al, 4E 7t� . 17 % y } : - f ••.y v t 1 i r_ 1 "1' �, J .r 0 24 Aw 19773 24 T Lee, Tq" Para 4375 Z. 24 24 W r yl 5120 51f( V 4. 24 1W 524 25 4416 4420 13 4424 '429 44 a 24 12 i 4425 4428 .Gi 432 -v 7 4424 4 4416 ejt 436 29 24 4433 1420 24 521 424 4437 28 5 4500 4501 4500 501 4500. 4500 4501 00 19505•. 4 5,,) 4 5 504 5225 522 11 !1 75 409 509 8 5 4508 451 19513 4512 51 4513 451 2 4517 45 517 4516 4517 4517 4516 31 502 1520 4 $21 4520 1521 - 452f 4520 4521 4516 1 528 4524 .525 4524 4525 4524 1 1 1 5036 4x25 4520 H W11 19362 =-Loll 5 t F � I t25 533 4532 529 4528 5040 5025 5016 SODB 5006r 4536 - 4 ji 4529 453 4524 ♦ 5012 537 . 4535- 533 5044 SU29 4540 4541 452E , 4544 45W45 0 545 ',37 5048 21, 5033 •545 17 501' 5oo,,? C544 24 (548 5324.5+04 5300. i ill' FS 23! -5 74 T 522 5216 4801 5209 5205 $201 - 512151175, oQ 4600 6 4905 51 L 4808 19811 -,a 4809 4813 h 5311 17 0; 5 17 5241 5237 52J3 5229 5221 5217 48 W.2 4613 4817 o 5 5309 481 `'317 , 4817 4816 4817 A 4825 a 48f6 4821 4821 48 20 25 ' 5101 51215117 4833 9— 5230 I -dF wr .......... *,, . A-A', • 1 wr .......... *,, . A-A', • r �� :7. IWA 24 'A 5805 *6- 57?11 17,5 580, 571 "05 0 7305 1713 721 57�15 5705 5701 309 r'soa 5610:1 5716 t,712 r-De b704 5'C 5816 36 3 SE14 �5820 LaW, 5811 15736 tAIM- 7406 7409 7452 7412 1411 7479 7448 7416 15 24 74Z 41 4 23 4," 6 74211 !,924 ,924 ,6 0 5E16 5to 2 5705 5808 5925 X f, I G 'AD9 5835 a, 5801 _ 5709 3539 �,797 .. c- 27'5723 SW 5759 5731 '5 wi xarm 7 IF Ia 7287424 WOW- _ 7 743624 406 7400 7438 --oks k4 .kid mim '"Ell, 4 4 444 24 74, ,;w AD 74-10 4, . 6� W10awboo •ti72f 7713 7720 f 77587762 7,'08 7777 7735 7766 771 7739 24 77787782' 5620 7724 77 32 '.'47 7786• "f:: g! 7751 7760 24 W10awboo ,�, ._, _.... 4.m .. ,:__. .. .. _..�, _....tea:._: =:* .:. � _ . _,...,...x. u �.�:.� __ _ _ .. __.. L- J IN 491 TitAt, 25 j "Vol. j ip Page 1 of 1 lute, „Pw \ritvwide \rPDSIinaaes \Photos \3102824110079002.jpg 3/22/2010 Page 1 of 1 files• /A \Prl_ntl na,N7\(itvwirii- \PT)CTmaaec \Phnto-,\ )1 028241 10079001.106 3/22/2010 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of I ' 'kttr%•iin;� tncr;z nra/T.(l(rTR Arc-.TMS /ims?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap OVSDE &... 3/22/2010 M yr. �� 1`f���� •�` �� ,� �'��rwr�{ +`•�� '� f .�.wi ref- .'✓bA' �Y�I *, ��1.�4' .t �� rr,✓ "r��� � �1 '. •" 1T'fi'f �� � � ' ti � �I �' Tr �/ i r �.. r, py1 Wit. + •,,.eyi� I �+ •f ; � ,'� i. V01". .S ` e v•� h Y � _ � ��s� ' � .�/ __'tom Y � .. ' 0 °. >� -.. .. �/'. � � :�.t ,.!':1. * •i..t+• /� � ''~ � �1 i�a.' �.{+,1_,.;,� ��:,'._ 1} 1,.�,F+,l,bw �„ A : �� i A4 t ^•, �. .- ., ''r ��r - a w3.. � �'t �.7' ti1r?dff "i�'r�"-.c ��� ,K "'`'i ' ''�'�f" �• ��� � s f ��. �"� q � }1N� ; y _ any' �� �[� i�, . '" •L.+. 1..ry. ^ its i s _. .�. =h s Y a_ �..jA MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Tuesday, January 27, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEM WS PRESENT: Chair Mi Fischer, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, evin Staunton, Michael Schroeder, eve Brown, Floyd Grabiel, Jeff - rpenter, Arlene Forrest and Karwehn Kata STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jacki ®® kker I. APP AL OF THE MINA S: The mi s of the November 24, 2009, m king were filed as submitted. NEW BUSINESS: 2010.0001 Colonial Church 6200 Colonial Way, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the proposal is to develop the vacant wooded portion of the Colonial Church site with a 4 -story, 150 -unit senior assisted living facility. Planner Teague explained that to accommodate the request, the following is required: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Residential. The High Density designation would allow the residential assisted living use. 2. A Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5. The PRD -5 District only allows rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. 3. A Preliminary Development Plan. 4. Final Development Plan. 5. Subdivision to create a new lot for the senior housing development. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 2 of 16 Planner Teague said with regard to parking that the applicant has demonstrated that enough parking would be provided for both the existing Colonial Church and the senior convalescent home. For the church, the required parking spaces must be one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly. The maximum capacity of the sanctuary in the church is 800 people; therefore, 266 spaces are required. The site plan demonstrates 341 parking spaces available for the church. The north lot contains 222 spaces, the west lot 20 spaces, and the east lot contains 99 spaces. The east lot was previously owned by Colonial Church, but dedicated to the City of Edina when the church was built back in 1978. Colonial Church and the City entered into a "Parking Lot Agreement" that allows the church to use the lot for their parking requirements. For the housing component, the required parking is one space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. Based on 194 resident maximum, 45 employees, one vehicle and one bus, 95 spaces are required. The site plan shows that there would be 93 surface stalls and 90 enclosed stalls. Planner Teague noted the access to the site would be from two entrance /exits from Colonial Way. There would be surface parking in front of the building, with the loading area behind the building. facing crosstown highway. A circular pick -up and drop off area would be located in front of the building. Access to the underground garage would be from the front of the building on the west side. The proposal would meet all minimum drive -aisle width standards. Continuing, Planner Teague stated the city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable Planner Teague reported that to accommodate the new building, 333 trees and shrubs would have to be removed. Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 54 over story trees and a full compliment of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing an extensive landscape plan that includes 132 over story trees that would remain, and planting back 207 over story trees and 572 understory trees and shrubs. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Residential; Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District -5; Preliminary Development Plan; and Preliminary Plat for the Waters senior living development at 6200 Colonial Way. Approval is subject to the following findings: The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. r Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 3 of 16 2. The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. C. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure - capacity through wise land use. Approval allows the applicant to proceed with Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans date stamped December 29, 2009. 2. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 3. Final Park Dedication requirement would be determined at Final Development Plan approval. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 4 of 16 4. Final Development Plans must be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Plans may be revised per conditions of the Watershed District. 5. Final Development Plans shall comply with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated January 21, 2010; the building official's memo dated January 7, 2010; and the fire marshal's memo dated January 11, 2010. Appearing for the Applicant Jay Jensen, Waters Senior Living, Ted Yoch, and Jack Ford, Colonial Church Discussion Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague the reason the rezoning request was to PRD -5. Planner Teague responded the PRD -5 zoning district is specifically for rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. An assisted living facility falls into that category. Commissioner Carpenter asked Planner Teague if there are other "rezoning options ". Planner Teague responded senior housing is permitted in all PRD zoning districts, MDD -4, 5 & 6 and PCD zoning districts; however, the services provided in this facility are unique. Commissioner Carpenter asked if Planner Teague knew of any vacant parcels (other than redevelopment) where this project would work. Planner Teague responded Edina is almost completely developed and he doesn't believe there are any vacant parcels available to accommodate a building of this size. Concluding, Planner Teague reported that in the City of Edina there are two other sites with a PRD -5 zoning, adding both are located along Crosstown_ near Xerxes Avenue. Commissioner Staunton questioned the reasoning behind staffs recommendation to require 20 units of affordable housing in the project. Planner Teague responded that the City of Edina has established a goal to provide 212 units of affordable housing units by 2020. Planner Teague noted because Edina is almost. completely developed there aren't many opportunities available to achieve the established goal. Development and redevelopment is one opportunity the City has in achieving its goal. Applicant Presentation Mr. Jensen addressed the Commission and explained their goal is to create a community with a foundation on "Residents First" and "Wellness ". Mr. Jensen said the Waters would be more than a building; it is the creation of a community. Continuing, Mr. Jensen said the average resident age is 86 years and most are women. The facility requires two meals per day to ensure overall wellness and to encourage residents (that are physically able) to get together. Mr. Jensen stated A15-3 Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 5 of 16 one of the unique things about this concept is that services are brought to the residents. Mr. Jensen reported that at this time the proposed building has a waiting list and the majority of those on the list are Edina residents or live within three miles of the site. Mr. Jensen referred to trees and landscaping and reported the most common trees on the site are Box Elder; however, there are also a number of Oak trees and other trees along the pond that will be preserved. Mr. Jensen said with regard to landscaping the goal is to provide a buffer to Colonial Church and its neighbors, adding at this time the trees proposed for landscaping would be evergreen trees. Mr. Jensen also reported a water retention pond is proposed to capture rain water and would be located on the western portion of the site. Continuing, Mr. Jensen said in the opinion of the development team there is more than sufficient parking to meet the needs of both the church and the proposed assisted living building. Mr. Jensen referred to the Traffic Impact Study done for the project noting that the study concluded that the existing roadway is more than sufficient to handle the additional traffic that would be generated from this project. With regard to energy Mr. Jensen reported the building would be energy efficient using efficient lighting, sufficient insulation and possibly geothermal heating and cooling. Continuing his presentation Mr. Jensen informed the Commission the church has held three neighborhood meetings. Concluding his presentation Mr. Jensen explained the layout of the facility and invited Commission Members to view their other facilities; the closest the Colony at Eden Prairie. Mr. Ted Yock, 6224 Braeburn Circle explained that church members after much discussion solicited RFP's and received 13 proposals. The team selected The Waters, adding they were very impressed with their facility in Eden Prairie. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel questioned the restrictiveness of the requested zoning reclassification especially in light of the fact that the Gramercy isn't doing very well, pointing out there are other projects the City has approved that haven't been constructed and all of those projects are "senior related ". Mr. Jensen responded there is a waiting list for this project, pointing out this project is rental, it isn't a co -op or a "for sale" product. Continuing, Mr. Jensen said a market analysis was done and it indicated a demand for this type of development. Concluding, Mr. Jensen stated the services provided for in this building are different and although the population it serves is senior it's a different beast. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 6 of 16 Commissioner Staunton asked Mr. Jensen how he feels about the affordable housing recommendation. Mr. Jensen responded he would like to try to achieve 20% affordable units by working closely with the City. Mr. Jensen explained that the Waters already works closely with Hennepin County on housing subsidy funds and noted that the cost of living in the proposed facility is actually lower than the cost of living in a nursing home. Mr. Jensen added an elderly waiver program is also available'to residents that meet certain guidelines. Commissioner Risser noted the reference to the possibility of geothermal heating and cooling and asked Mr. Jensen how far along they are in the process of finding out if that is an option. Mr. Jensen responded their findings are about two weeks out. Commissioner Risser questioned if solar energy was considered. Mr. Jensen responded they haven't looked into that but are hopeful geothermal is an option. Commissioner Staunton questioned how lighting was addressed. Mr. Jensen responded that all exterior lighting would be directed down. With regard to the building itself, Mr. Jensen said that after 9:30 pm the majority of units are dark, except for the public areas. He also added that soft lighting would be incorporated in the cupola, reiterating that all external lights (parking lot, etc) would be directed down. Commissioner Schroeder said he reviewed the landscaping plans and pointed out a number of Oak tress would be lost and the replacement strategy is mostly focused on evergreen trees, not Oaks. Continuing, Commissioner. Schroeder suggested that the church also consider talking with MNDOT about implementing a joint plan on tree replacement in and near the right -of -way. Mr. Jensen responded he would be happy to check with MNDOT regarding the sites boundary with MNDOT, adding it was his suggestion to plant evergreen trees. Mr. Jensen explained that he thought evergreen trees would better screen the highway from both visual and noise pollution. Commissioner Schroeder said he also noted on the plans that the path from the bridge doesn't connect to the front door, it abruptly stops. Commissioner Schroeder said in his opinion the bridge is iconic and "users" of the bridge should be directed somewhere. Chair Fischer said he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder's comment on the bridge, he said in his opinion there appears to be a disconnect in this area. Mr. Jensen responded that he would look into that. Commissioner Grabiel said he appreciates that attention was made to the lighting, adding he lives up the hill from Christ Presbyterian Church and lighting can be an issue. �Is- �-- Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 7 of 16 Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. Public Comment Robert Scroggins, 6256 Sandpiper Court, addressed the Commission and stated he lives in the multi - family development directly west and adjacent to the subject property, adding he has worked with and has the highest respect for Mr. Jensen. Continuing, Mr. Scroggins said he believes the City's Park & Recreation Department is considering reconfiguring Country Side Park, and if that's the case; Colonial should get together with the City to discuss and work together on any changes. Mr. Scroggins reported that where he lives lighting from the church hasn't been a problem. Concluding, Mr. Scroggins stated the City should stay firm on their recommendation that the project provides affordable housing if approved. Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff Place told the Commission he has a number of points he would like to share with them, adding they are not pro or con. 1. vacancies already exist in a number of assisted living facilities; 2. the building as proposed is "out of sync" with the character of the neighborhood (too tall); 3. the proposed assisted living facility is a for - profit venture. It may be better if it were non - profit; 4. the proposed location for the assisted living facility is close to a City park where children play etc; 5. if approved the church is "giving up" the south parking lot; should a Proof of Parking Agreement be required especially when the church has contiguous events there is overflow. Concluding, Mr. Johnson said he would like the Planning Commission to table this issue. Mr. Johnson said there still are a number of issues that need to be addressed; adding sewer capacity and the aquifer are also issues that should be addressed to ensure they have the capacity to handle the proposed development. Mr. Johnson also questioned the size of the building and asked the applicant to consider a smaller facility. The facility as proposed is just too large. . Diane Greig, 6412 Red Fox, addressed the Commission and told them she has a problem with traffic, adding Tracy Avenue is very busy and can be hazardous. Ms. Greig pointed out this neighborhood has Crosstown and the High School on one side and the grade school on the other side. Ms. Greig explained from experience she knows that assisted living facility /nursing home units are empty. Concluding, Ms. Greig said there is a trend of aging in place; however, there has to be a way to give younger families the opportunity to live in Edina too. j +J �f Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 8 of 16 Dorothy Krezner, 5928 Jeff Place, addressed the Commission and informed them she is very concerned with light spillage and traffic. Josephine Braun, 5833 Jeff Place, acknowledged that Colonial Church has been a good neighbor and expressed the following concerns: 1. construction impact on the water level, noting this area has a high water table. 2. removal of trees 3. traffic William Rodgers, 6100 Arbor Lane, told the Commission traffic is really a concern on Tracy Avenue. He pointed out that today the majority of kids drive their own cars to school and adding school buses to the mix creates congestion. Concluding, Mr. Rodgers questioned if a sound wall is planned if the assisted living facility is constructed. Chair Fischer asked if anyone else would care to speak to the issue; being none; Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Discussion and Questions Chair Fischer noted that it appears from comments by the neighbors that the majority of their concern is traffic. Commissioner Schroeder noted that the applicant provided a traffic analysis and it appears to him based on that analysis that conflict from this project, if any, is minimal during peak times. Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Jensen if the proposed facility has shift changes. Mr. Jensen responded that this facility doesn't have shift changes, adding its "manned" 24 hours a day. Mr. Jensen also asked the Commission to note that the facility is located near a transit line which would enable employees the option of using mass transit. Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Jensen the "parking demand" patterns for employees and visitors, adding he has a concern with parking. Mr. Jensen responded that there are between 40 -45 employees during the peak time 9 am -6 pm. The majority of visitors come between 6 pm and 8:30 pm M -F plus weekend days. He said there aren't a lot of morning visitors. Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Jensen if the employee parking would be under the building. Mr. Jensen responded in the affirmative. Chair Fischer noted Mr. Johnson suggested the possibility of implementing a Proof of Parking Agreement to ensure adequate parking and asked Mr. Jensen if he knows of a good place to "designate" that parking. Mr. Jensen responded that there are areas in the lower level parking garage earmarked for storage and from Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 9 of 16 experience he has found that residents that don't have vehicles allow their children to use their stalls to store boats and other miscellaneous items. Concluding, Mr. Jensen said if the storage items were eliminated it would free -up roughly 30 -35 spaces (if the need arises). Mr. Jensen stated that maintaining adequate parking in partnership with Colonial Church is very important, and any parking issues would be worked out. Commissioner Staunton pointed out that parking for the project as proposed satisfies all ordinance requirements questioning if the City can recommend a Proof of Parking Agreement when parking for the proposed facility meets /or exceeds the ordinance. Commissioner Brown commented that it may be possible the ordinance requirements don't meet the demand. He said from experience with Christ Presbyterian that when contiguous events occur parking can spill into a neighborhood. Chair Fischer noted another item that was mentioned as a concern was the water table and the aquifer. Chair Fischer asked Mr. Jensen if he would look into these issues. Mr. Jensen responded he would, adding the project requires a permit from the Watershed District and those concerns would be raised. Mr. Jensen added they will also know more when they receive the results from drilling for geothermal fuels. Commissioner Forrest questioned the size of the building and the reasoning behind the number of units. Mr. Jensen explained that to operate a successful facility and meet the needs of the residents certain staffing /resident ratios need to be met. A discussion ensued regarding the date of the traffic study since it appears that the data was collected when school was out of session. It was recommended that a new traffic study be conducted to ensure that all "information" regarding traffic is implemented into the report. During the discussion it was brought up that there is the option of tabling the hearing until the traffic study is updated and /or refer the proposal back to the Transportation Commission for their review with the new data. Commissioners concluded that although the data submitted wasn't done when school was in session the traffic generated from this particular development probably won't have a large impact on what is happening on Tracy Avenue and the Crosstown. It was also suggested that the neighborhood contact the City and express to the Traffic Safety Coordinator their concerns with traffic on Tracy and the Crosstown entrance /exit. Commissioner Grabiel said if he understands the process correctly that this hearing is the first step of a two step process. Continuing, Commissioner Grabiel asked if the request for a Guide Plan change is also two steps. Planner Teague responded that the Guide Plan change is a one step process requiring a 4/5 vote at the Council level. Planner Teague said Commissioner Grabiel is also correct that two steps are required for the rezoning, subdivision and development plan; �4�t Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 10 of 16 adding this evening the Commission is in the preliminary stages of those approvals (if approved). Chair Fischer suggested that the motions be separated; first, the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and second; preliminary rezoning, subdivision and final development plan. Commissioners agreed that separating the requests makes sense. Commissioner Staunton said his understanding was if the Commission and Council don't approve a Guide Plan change the project can't advance. Planner Teague responded that is correct. Continuing, Commissioner Staunton questioned the inconsistency in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague said the inconsistency isn't in the plan; it's with the land use map. Planner Teague explained that the land use map is based on existing land use(s). Commissioner Brown said that while he believes the proposed location for the assisted living facility within the Colonial Church campus is good he is worried about the scope of the proposal and its impact on the neighborhood, adding he is struggling with this request. Commission Action Commissioner Brown moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to High Density Residential. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Scherer moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, single - Dwelling Unit District to PRD -5, Planned Residential District; Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions; including; The traffic study submitted by the applicant,needs to be recalculated to reflect traffic when school is open. The assisted living facility is to contain 20% or 30 affordable housing units; and Implement Traffic Demand Management Plan (TMD) strategies 7 B. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Grabiel said in his opinion this sounds like a good project; however, he does have concerns about its viability because of the present economy; however that isn't the purview of the Commission. Commissioner Grabiel added he also has a concern with the City requiring affordable housing, when it isn't required by ordinance; but all -in -all, in his opinion it's an interesting and a good sound project. Minutes Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 11 of 16 Commissioner Brown stated he shares Commissioner Grabiels concern over the viability of the project. Commissioner Brown reiterated he worries about the scope of the project, adding he questions how this project will coexist with the surrounding diverse land uses. Commissioner Staunton stated in his opinion this is a good project that satisfies many of the goals established in the Comprehensive Plan. Continuing, Commissioner Staunton said rezoning the property to PRD -5 makes sense because it's the only district that would allow this type of facility. Commissioner Staunton pointed out that building height is established by setbacks and this project meets setback and building height requirements. No variances are requested. Commissioner Staunton said in his opinion the proposed citing of the building is perfect, it fits, reiterating it's in the ideal location. Ayes; Carpenter, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Grabiel, Brown, Forrest, Fischer. Nays; Risser. Motion carried 8 -1. 2010.0002 Lot Division Jeffrey Parell and Tony Giannakakis 55000 and 5504 Halifax Lane, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Mr. Jeffry Parell and Tony Giannakakis are proposing to shift the existing lot line that divides 5500 and 5504 Halifax Lane for the purpose of adding a 23 foot strip of land to 5504 Halifax Lane. The existing home at 5500 Halifax would be torn down and a new home built. The home at 5504 Halifax Lane was recently built, and would remain. The new home at 5500 Halifax would be required to meet all applicable zoning ordinance standards as part of the building permit process. The proposal does not create a new lot. Continuing, Planner Teague said staff believes the request is reasonable. The resulting lots after the lot line shift meet all minimum zoning ordinance standards. Currently 5504 Halifax is a substandard lot, with a lot width of 65 feet. The median lot width in the neighborhood is 76.7 feet. The lot line between these two lots would simply be shifted to allow additional area and width at 5504 Halifax. Again, there would not be a new lot created. The lot line shift would bring the lot at 5504 Halifax into compliance with the median lot width in the neighborhood. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5504 and 5500 Halifax Lane subject to the following findings: 41� Feb. 16, 2010 Edina City Council meeting minutes Page 2 of 8 Member introduced and moved adoption of Re Ati f�22, approving proposed use of 2010 Ur in County Co a opment Block Grant .Program funds and authorizing execution o s agreement with Hennepin County and any third party agreements. Membe n secon motion. Rollcall: nett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland otion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA — RESOLUTION NO. 2010- 25 and 2010 -26 ADOPTED APPROVING GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT, THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the application of The Waters Senior Living of Edina, 6200 Colonial Way, for a four story 150 -unit senior housing project. He stated the first consideration would be the requested comprehensive guide plan amendment from public /semi- public to high density residential, a rezoning from R -1 single family unit district to PRD -5 planned residential district -5, preliminary development plan, and subdivision to create a new lot for the development. This action would require a four -fifths vote of the Council. The second consideration would be the preliminary rezoning, preliminary development plan and preliminary plat, which required a three -fifths favorable vote of the Council. Mr. Teague presented details of the project and advised the proponent desired to offer affordable housing if some assistance was offered by the City. He stated the Planning Commission, on an eight aye and one nay vote, recommended approval subject to the findings and conditions identified in the staff report. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council regarding zoning and parking requirements. Mr. Teague advised that every unit within this development would receive care, meeting the definition of assisted living residence. The Council noted a trail on Colonial Way was not proposed, which could be addressed prior to final plat consideration. Proponent Presentation Jay Jensen, Covenire Care, presented their development philosophy of "residents first" that allowed residents to age in place and goal for residents to live as independently as possible even though all received services. He described the proposed project components, displayed visuals of site features, and advised of market demand and derived public benefit. Ted Yoch, Colonial Church Development Task Force Chairman, reviewed their RFP process Colonial Church had followed to find a qualified developer for this project and asked for the Council's favorable approval. Senior Pastor Jack Fortin, Colonial Church, extended support for The Waters Senior Living project and affordable housing component. Pastor David Holm, Director of Spiritual Services for The Waters Senior Living, described their extended spiritual program. The Council asked questions of Mr. Yoch and Mr. Jensen about the project and opportunities given to the neighborhood for input. Mr. Jensen explained that affordable units would be available through the Hennepin County Elderly Waiver Program and their intent to offer affordable units even if State funding for that program was withdrawn. He advised that sidewalks would be incorporated to provide access between buildings and to the park. Mr. Jensen responded to the Council's concern with building mass on the north elevation, design materials, and traffic. Frank Nevis, HGA Architects, answered questions of the Council and presented an exterior materials htrn-// www. ri_ erlin a_mn_u. /CitvCouncil /CitvCouncil MeetinaMinutes /20100216ReR.htm 6/23/2010 Feb. 16, 2010 Edina City Council meeting minutes sample board. Page 3 of 8 Vernon Swing, RLK, Inc. answered questions of the Council regarding the traffic service level at the Crosstown ramps and Tracy Avenue. RLK had determined the amount of traffic generated by the development would be negligible and non - perceptible when compared to the existing traffic and would not impact the level of service. Mr. Jensen described the landscaping plan and downcast box lighting that would be used. Mr. Jensen stated staff would have overlapping schedules that would avoid a.m. and p.m. rush hours. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Public Testimony Maria Field, representing Heritage of Edina, addressed the Council. Lawrence Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, addressed the Council. Patricia Mohr, 5440 Vernon Avenue, addressed the Council. Chase Lindberger, representing Edina Park Plaza, addressed the Council. Dorothy Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, addressed the Council. Bill Johnson, 5816 Olinger Boulevard, addressed the Council. Gene Holderness, 6807 Dovre Drive, addressed the Council. Sarah Jones, 4701 Aspasia Circle, addressed the Council. Kevin Smith, 5125 Schaefer Road, addressed the Council. Liz Beer, 5804 Jeff Place, addressed the Council. Jeff Pope, 6621 Mohawk Trail, addressed the Council. Jennifer Myers, 4208 Oakdale Avenue, addressed the Council. Elgin Manhard, 5529 Village Drive, addressed the Council. Nancy Frykman, 6028 Schaefer Road, addressed the Council. Michael Hime, 5300 Chantrey Road, addressed the Council. Bill Rodgers, 6100 Arbour Lane, addressed the Council. Steven Anderson, 7008 Mark Terrace Drive, addressed the Council. Judith Rodgers, 6100 Arbour Lane, addressed the Council. Ted Yoch, 6224 Braeburn Circle, addressed the Council. Jennifer Kemp, Property Manager of Vernon Terrace, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. [4 h Feb. 16, 2010 Edina City Council meeting minutes Page 4 of 8 The Council stressed its goal was always community benefit. At the request of the Council, Mr. Teague and the proponents addressed questions raised during the public hearing. Following discussion of the project, the Council stated the need for enhanced exterior treatment of the memory care building and requested additional analysis of the affordability component. Member Housh introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -26, approving a guide plan amendment from quasi - public to high density residential for Colonial Church at 6200 Colonial Way subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing development to the west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential/ commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. c. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure capacity through wise land use. and subject to the following conditions: 1. Rezoning and preliminary development plan approval for a senior assisted - living project. Member Swenson seconded the motion. The Council indicated the City's demographics had evolved, this project met a community need, and created an opportunity to bring a new offering of quality senior housing by a provider with a proven track record. It also met initiatives within the Comprehensive Plan. The need to balance competing interests was addressed and concern discussed about the size, scope, and scale of the project. The Council indicated that due diligence had been completed in consideration of the requested guide plan amendment. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett requested that the previous motion be reconsidered allowing her to change her vote, stating while she supported the guide plan amendment and preliminary concept, she would not support the project as designed. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to reconsider. r (", T. I't J litrn-Hururiv ri P(iina mn „� /r;tvrn„nr.;l /f itvC'rn�ncil MeetingMinutes /20100216Res.htm 6/23/2010 Feb. 16, 2010 Edina City Council meeting minutes Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 5 of 8 Member Housh introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2010 -26, approving a guide plan amendment from quasi - public to high density residential for Colonial Church at 6200 Colonial Way, subject to the findings and conditions as stated above. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -25, approving a preliminary rezoning, preliminary plat and preliminary development plan for The Colonial Church site at 6200 Colonial Way subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The senior housing development is consistent with the multiple family housing development to the west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If affordable housing is included, it would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 5. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan. a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential/ commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and a other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. c. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure capacity through wise land use. and subject to the following conditions: 1. The final development plan must be generally consistent .with approved preliminary development plans date - stamped December 29, 2009. 2. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 3. Final park dedication requirement would be determined at final development plan approval. 4. Final development plans must be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Plans must be revised per conditions of the Watershed District. 5. Final development plans shall comply with all the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated January 21, 2010; the building official's memo dated January 7, 2010, and the fire marshal's memo dated January 11, 2010. 6. Implementation of the applicant's Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM), as submitted. 7. Thirty units or twenty percent (20 %) of the project may contain affordable housing. How the - -- - _ - ____ .. in:+..n .,,. ;l ir�;+„('�,,,,,�;1 1�/faat;naM;n „fPC / ?(11 fill? l 6R eu htm 6/23/2010 Feb. 16, 2010 Edina City Council meeting minutes w � Page 6of8 ` affordable housing would be accomplished would be determined at the time of final development plan and final rezoning. 8. On -site sidewalks must be incorporated into the Final Development Plan, and have connections. 9. Provide a ten -foot trail easement as part of the park dedication requirement. 10. Cross - easements must be established over the exterior parking lot of the senior housing project, to allow the church access to those spaces. 11. The exterior of the memory care units (north facing east end of the building) must be revised and enhanced, subject to review and approval at the time of final development-plan. 12. Building elevations or perspectives from Olinger Boulevard showing the proposed building and landscaping as planted, must be submitted as part of the Final Development Plan Application. 13. Additional landscaping should be provided along the north side of the property. Member Housh seconded the motion. Mr. Nevis presented the exterior materials sample board and answered questions of the Council. The Council noted the renderings identified the view from the Church property and requested renderings as viewed from residential homes with and without vegetation. The Council indicated that while it supported the concept of this project, concern remained with the four -story height and mass as currently designed. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. RING Notice pres?PiLed and ordered placed on file. GVIYV%7 - Affidavits of Mr. Hughes prese d the recommendation to refund bonds to garner,�f nifcant savings either through reissuing lease revena&bonds or a more advantageous savings to� �j�dfund through issuance of general obligation bonds. He ised that the second alternative re tired holding a public hearing and amendment to the capital rovement plan. It was noted t jwould not involve new spending, but reduction of existing debt. Mayor Hovland opened the public he ' g at 10:45tpi Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, secoat'ded by M ber Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Reso 'on No. 2010 -24, giving preliminary approval for the issuance of general obligation capital impro ment plan bonds in an amount not to exceed $9,500'0 and adopting the City of Edina, Minn ta, capital improvement plan for 2010 through 20.14 under Minnesota statutes, section 475.521. ember Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: ,�% Ayes: Be tt , Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion rried. *A RD OF BID — 2010 FIBER OPTIC LOCATION CONTRACT RENEWED Motion made by htm• / /wjww r;- edina .mn.ii .R/CitvCnuncil /CitvCouncil MeetinaMinutes /20100216ReR.htm 6/23/2010 v THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus of The Colonial Church of Edina FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ANDREZONING PERMIT CIVIL LANDSCAPE SU 3/3 '?0.' SRF FiFNt�LITI�n Finn '3Vj s PI- z, G Sn :RADINQ PL" 3(-:• -,FFE .1-ILIT, - nN I ARCHITECTURAL 1EP 111 1-1 F 110A = - ELE 1 7:7Q- ELI I AE— VF% DF -, -F m:,CF _AN RENDE U' 11Fw 1 Yiv.I.1 11111E— IF- IIIEW L1)V1NL 1R- 'ET PER- VIEW 6 - 14-'PTHWE-- - ICV h1- I -H IP4DrP- VM P MkNr ��,-,W - I 911V TRA,�r _ RF-- VIM C - L"INI 1-I-W T -- P.• W11`11 IF-1-11i ,E'4DER----- VIEW C' L,3KINL ACRCiS PART THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING' [R. Architecture I Engineering I Planning "ammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc - 202 let Avenue SW Suite 218 tar, ' Minnesota USA 55502 -3129 S., _.::* T.I.ph..: 2F8 . , .1 . M, le 607.2 B 1. 8688 CURRENT PACKAGE INFORMATION COMMISSION NUMBER: 3077-001-00 DATE: MAY 2812010 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE HISTORY PACKAGE PACKAGE DESCRIPTION DATE City of Edina December 28, 2009 PLANNING SUBMITTAL City of Edina May 28, 2010 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN COVER SHEET a 3 I� Boundary /Topographic Tree Survey 1 Coloniol Church of Edina 6200 Colonist WaY Edno. MN 55436 R -1 (Single Dwellingg Unit District) PID Via `mod �elp9 . _x_96 ✓/' Joe / VA \�o rJ The Waters Senior living of Edina a/ L O i -(a`,a 9mm5 �e7 p Cpl,;; �r _ �` R,xSS 860.0 238 Q/ 01112 6 ,a a0 l 12 67 Vill be r lw 121 xx , f 1.S� \ j 4 >2� M. COLONIAL CHURCH EDINA, MN TNH- 871.98 (NCVI) 29) Ax \� 0 N �NO Vro o0 �' 1 J °o Z Vo _� Ilryd' \ 1R 1x66 \ Qmlxm� f- N 95J,l •� \,�•, t _ 11F 1232 1R I `r' 8G� j� tfi A 6xdr7•e /Y / axn.+�'n , J 1.g 3. "' -aa'y .]d ay �� , /2 / 12.2���// x I ' ' � w t o �' +�" a�-wT - t _ w`�p ,"x°' i " l:/j I { {��`����///,[[/����' / 1R�vz� a��-Lfl'� „�_�g�_ ,� •(aa �� ' x .tx, 1 ¢ 1 i. a6 J a�i 3 "x+e 'x y mm.n ]] mt>o✓ / � }s��-�ld +�^ tA�ll]� . av, / / // ✓ �B %1- (J�- _ = i E O I 12 I I tl �a 3�7 -' .n 7 ., �I xehsxo•R s t iose 3;Ar4' , �,n ' M. +;z `5 1 . '\ \ t \ 1 , \c,. .. ;.r ..s' ;>moYte ; `� " �y . _ � a )y3° , S� l jl�us x„Y:�x •# ". " ..r�' . F Iu2s tB w d ' m p 71 4 i m19 6ts t mJ ' idnt.J b f lne»x4 a t 5. 1 CR / t s, a n m•a / �\ 1 15 as 5 ,. e s. ).69e.7b `sU,. kk .i;a a �'n22'r?"�c ,`�AJy''. : ,cuter: % •2 nxHi�' t �/ // +��, es' - s.. /Aawr . x ; ( - pp r�'{r Icaw a "T.- . _i. � 1 .� � "-� -n1�• 6552 \�/ / / / / Q r�`iz� �• s, +l LOCATION MAP NOT To SCAM SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 21 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Fe EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION E:' .., :::,' „- ..fz:=':c�?'i7 (As per Schedule A of Commitment to Title from First American Title Insurance CempaA File No. # NCS- 391079 -MPLS, dated March 1, 2009.) 'A, o PARCEL 1: e]sa` Lot 1. Block 2, Colanlol Church of Edina First Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL 2 a, None %da9Ive ea errant far parking Purposes over part of Lot 1, Block 1, Colonial Church of Edina First Addition, as contained and described In the Parking Lot Agreement recorded as Document No. P 4338375 in the records of the County Records. Hennepin County, MM"esota. [ "Y' 2 d Abstract Property w ; in 4 i on 'PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION n Thal Port of It 1, Black 2, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION aeaading t m ..dad at thereof. Hennepin Count Minnesota C I n coated d aouN d of toN I described line: W eD Y. YI 9 Y Y 9 H Commencing at the most coated norlhest al come, he said Lot 7' thence North 89 d f feet; minutes nce North West eesu ed bearing, along the north line of said Lot 1, -, thence of 33296 feet thence North a degrees 57 mlg , r 34 seconds Weat, distance of 91. of thence long a u veto the northeast Navin radius line. 7I distance feet a central a It of 9 d r of 18 9 a 9 e9 e • of the a seconds, tangent to last described Zino, s distance es 25.28 feet to the point of beglnning of the Ifac to be described; Soul thence South minutes utes 58 00 minutes 1B seconds distance e o distance h Of / 250.34 feet; thence South 44 degrees 07 minutes is 9ccenda Eaat, a distance of 40.31 feat: thence 37 m 53 degrees 00 mine as 18 stance Wet, eat; thence c 780.35 feet; grenae North 6e degrees se minutes 12 seconds distaff weal. a .57feet, or re or foot; tnonce South 04 degrees 00 minutes he terminating. West, a distance of 217.57 feet more or lase, to the eoulh Ilna of said lot 7, and these tanninating. xer� EGEND 'rnr.'435 ,'mss P L _ �.,�r� °"' - ,•ao +sees = CAST IRON MONUMENT = WATERMAIN 19Ttoe ,ate M / yT '� = JUDICIAL LANDMARK v &J.) � = SANITARY SEWER \) 2 oiay�ts / '.y`;;u IRON MONUMENT FOUND ro SANITARY FORCEMNN I J O = IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED » =STORM SEWER ' Hz Pro / / 1 y .... WITH LICENSE NO. 23968. uG =CAS MAIN i /as as / o al / az9 /// // / =FOUND PK NAIL o = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC I I UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC a� x m,J• JJe siJS. �2� 3Zl�/ j/ / / /= FOUND SPIKE O = SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE / � iJ•) txa] lgL / ,a ory = OVERHEAD CABLE TELEVISION (Tel F' G[� m�1SS,a , =� 1. iJ er,�/ I / /�j //� Qe4= HYDRANT u1� = UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION 3 I ` tad "e]s / / / '/ / / eM. O = STORM SEWER MANHOLE er // _/ / o OVERHEAD TELEPHONE /� // / ®n ®m CATCH BASIN ur = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE w 5 ,35o11a 'a A ���.n/- / /'� xms / / Tso - GATE VALVE As FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE ��� ✓� / � / M = CABLE TELEVISION BOX 1 I e] 7 ~ J / I1110 - TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR TM �s r.:.:,.r - / / /.� ®= ELECTRICAL BOX �Bpg� � � =TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR a �� M Ly tin ' e of =�; Blwk -Z 1'z� , n •�.W/ / �• ass ] LJ = ELECTRIC METER _ - . - -EDGE OF WETLAND -_ lgt7 ELECTRIC HAND HOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE FENCE \ -esa�' .es•e /gra�Yµ e = ELECTRIC POWER POLE CONTROLLED ACCESS �' �'ta•.o \ _- _ -- / 9 = _as - k, X 800.0 =SPOT ELEVANON y I,� T +�V ._y NORTH g = GAS METER °+2� epb� DECIDUOUS 7REE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOX LIGHT POLE GUARD POST Q 3`I((; - = CONIFEROUS TREE COLONIAL 1PA r a5 . sss 33 42 E' ���Be��r ����.���� - TREELNE + 181005 • AIBO• yppj % wt10p2 x Y -2 1 .. x,p 1115 1119 1120 IIID ] x x • x eyes / xII]. xaaa ,: X122`} ,ac, _ x___L. ^� \a ^ -Dro & Utlly Easement pa t )x 7 a xBM.+ plat ft C01 A` CHURCH OF Il v ttte FRFET 1Dra r t lrFl A S R ✓,be _ �. �, I EDINA ADDIABN%x- I 5e0 -.4 1R1135Go px Imt9x O i -(a`,a 9mm5 �e7 p Cpl,;; �r _ �` R,xSS 860.0 238 Q/ 01112 6 ,a a0 l 12 67 Vill be r lw 121 xx , f 1.S� \ j 4 >2� M. COLONIAL CHURCH EDINA, MN TNH- 871.98 (NCVI) 29) Ax \� 0 N �NO Vro o0 �' 1 J °o Z Vo _� Ilryd' \ 1R 1x66 \ Qmlxm� f- N 95J,l •� \,�•, t _ 11F 1232 1R I `r' 8G� j� tfi A 6xdr7•e /Y / axn.+�'n , J 1.g 3. "' -aa'y .]d ay �� , /2 / 12.2���// x I ' ' � w t o �' +�" a�-wT - t _ w`�p ,"x°' i " l:/j I { {��`����///,[[/����' / 1R�vz� a��-Lfl'� „�_�g�_ ,� •(aa �� ' x .tx, 1 ¢ 1 i. a6 J a�i 3 "x+e 'x y mm.n ]] mt>o✓ / � }s��-�ld +�^ tA�ll]� . av, / / // ✓ �B %1- (J�- _ = i E O I 12 I I tl �a 3�7 -' .n 7 ., �I xehsxo•R s t iose 3;Ar4' , �,n ' M. +;z `5 1 . '\ \ t \ 1 , \c,. .. ;.r ..s' ;>moYte ; `� " �y . _ � a )y3° , S� l jl�us x„Y:�x •# ". " ..r�' . F Iu2s tB w d ' m p 71 4 i m19 6ts t mJ ' idnt.J b f lne»x4 a t 5. 1 CR / t s, a n m•a / �\ 1 15 as 5 ,. e s. ).69e.7b `sU,. kk .i;a a �'n22'r?"�c ,`�AJy''. : ,cuter: % •2 nxHi�' t �/ // +��, es' - s.. /Aawr . x ; ( - pp r�'{r Icaw a "T.- . _i. � 1 .� � "-� -n1�• 6552 \�/ / / / / Q r�`iz� �• s, +l LOCATION MAP NOT To SCAM SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 21 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Fe EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION E:' .., :::,' „- ..fz:=':c�?'i7 (As per Schedule A of Commitment to Title from First American Title Insurance CempaA File No. # NCS- 391079 -MPLS, dated March 1, 2009.) 'A, o PARCEL 1: e]sa` Lot 1. Block 2, Colanlol Church of Edina First Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL 2 a, None %da9Ive ea errant far parking Purposes over part of Lot 1, Block 1, Colonial Church of Edina First Addition, as contained and described In the Parking Lot Agreement recorded as Document No. P 4338375 in the records of the County Records. Hennepin County, MM"esota. [ "Y' 2 d Abstract Property w ; in 4 i on 'PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION n Thal Port of It 1, Black 2, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION aeaading t m ..dad at thereof. Hennepin Count Minnesota C I n coated d aouN d of toN I described line: W eD Y. YI 9 Y Y 9 H Commencing at the most coated norlhest al come, he said Lot 7' thence North 89 d f feet; minutes nce North West eesu ed bearing, along the north line of said Lot 1, -, thence of 33296 feet thence North a degrees 57 mlg , r 34 seconds Weat, distance of 91. of thence long a u veto the northeast Navin radius line. 7I distance feet a central a It of 9 d r of 18 9 a 9 e9 e • of the a seconds, tangent to last described Zino, s distance es 25.28 feet to the point of beglnning of the Ifac to be described; Soul thence South minutes utes 58 00 minutes 1B seconds distance e o distance h Of / 250.34 feet; thence South 44 degrees 07 minutes is 9ccenda Eaat, a distance of 40.31 feat: thence 37 m 53 degrees 00 mine as 18 stance Wet, eat; thence c 780.35 feet; grenae North 6e degrees se minutes 12 seconds distaff weal. a .57feet, or re or foot; tnonce South 04 degrees 00 minutes he terminating. West, a distance of 217.57 feet more or lase, to the eoulh Ilna of said lot 7, and these tanninating. xer� EGEND 'rnr.'435 ,'mss P L _ �.,�r� °"' - ,•ao +sees = CAST IRON MONUMENT = WATERMAIN 19Ttoe ,ate M / yT '� = JUDICIAL LANDMARK v &J.) � = SANITARY SEWER \) 2 oiay�ts / '.y`;;u IRON MONUMENT FOUND ro SANITARY FORCEMNN I J O = IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED » =STORM SEWER ' Hz Pro / / 1 y .... WITH LICENSE NO. 23968. uG =CAS MAIN i /as as / o al / az9 /// // / =FOUND PK NAIL o = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC I I UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC a� x m,J• JJe siJS. �2� 3Zl�/ j/ / / /= FOUND SPIKE O = SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE / � iJ•) txa] lgL / ,a ory = OVERHEAD CABLE TELEVISION (Tel F' G[� m�1SS,a , =� 1. iJ er,�/ I / /�j //� Qe4= HYDRANT u1� = UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION 3 I ` tad "e]s / / / '/ / / eM. O = STORM SEWER MANHOLE er // _/ / o OVERHEAD TELEPHONE /� // / ®n ®m CATCH BASIN ur = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE w 5 ,35o11a 'a A ���.n/- / /'� xms / / Tso - GATE VALVE As FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE ��� ✓� / � / M = CABLE TELEVISION BOX 1 I e] 7 ~ J / I1110 - TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR TM �s r.:.:,.r - / / /.� ®= ELECTRICAL BOX �Bpg� � � =TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR a �� M Ly tin ' e of =�; Blwk -Z 1'z� , n •�.W/ / �• ass ] LJ = ELECTRIC METER _ - . - -EDGE OF WETLAND -_ lgt7 ELECTRIC HAND HOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE FENCE \ -esa�' .es•e /gra�Yµ e = ELECTRIC POWER POLE CONTROLLED ACCESS �' �'ta•.o \ _- _ -- / 9 = _as - k, X 800.0 =SPOT ELEVANON y I,� T +�V ._y NORTH g = GAS METER °+2� epb� DECIDUOUS 7REE .,NOTES 1. Fas seraph ownership Is waited In The Colonist Church of Edina, a Mtmente non- profit corpoalion 2 Area of property Is 256.772 q.ft. or 612 o,xee. 3. Property is abstract. 4. The property has access to Colonic] Way, o dedicated public street. 5. The address of the property h 6200 Colonial Way, Edina, MN 55436. 6. See Sheet 2 of 2 for Tree Inventory. 7. Above round ut9ltles how been field located as shown NI underground utility rvl s 1 dn the property haw attempted to be Feld located through the -A- of Gopher State On. Call pa ticket number 90196022. However, some f the utility eamponlea failed to field locate underground utility location. In those case, utilities shown are from City of Edna and previous cords. The surveyor makes no rantess that the under round ut8ltias shown eom rise all. h ulliltles In the area either In servl a or ,ban 12 a The suiveyor further does not wmrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact Ixation indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurately as poaelDle from information available. The wrwyor has not physically located the underground utilities. Prior to any excavation or digging contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site location (651- 454 - 0002). 8. Underground Fiber optic line rune north and south near the east line of the property. Location of line 1, per Fdd markin s In lace at the time of eurw . P 9 P Y 9. The property Ilw in flood zone X (arena determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood Plane) ae designated on Flood Insurance Rate Map Communlly Panel Number 2705300363E, City, of Edina, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency effective data September 2. 2004. 10. Item, pertaining to Schedule B Seetlon II of Commitment to Title from First American This Insurance Company. File No. NCS- 391079 MPLS, doted Moth 1, 2009: OItem 10 - Property subject to ssements for utility, drainage and ponding purp beas a as shown 10 an vi ecorded e recorded plot of COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION, r Octor 4, 1977 as Document No. 4321785 as shown hereon. Item it - Easement far drainage ditch puM-se together with any Incidental rights, In favor T The Village (now City) of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corpoation, ae contained in the Easement for Drainage Ditch, dated November 7, 1960, corded November 22, 1960 as Document No 3263251 In Book 2278 Decd, at page 548, d the Easement for Drainage Ditch, dated November 3 1960 recorded November 22 1960 as Document No. 3263252 In Book 2278 Deady at page 549. Does not affect this portion of Lot 1, Block 2. 12 Item 12 Property is subject to a lack of direct aooese to County Road No. 62 as shown by Can notion No. 384 Final Certificate dated August 21 1967 recorded August 25. 1967 as Document No. 3671986 In Back 2599 of Deeds at page 347 as shown hereon Item 13 - Easement for drainage and filtering system purposes, together with any Incidental rights, In favor of The Village (now City) of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, as o -alned In the Warranty Deed, doted February 2, 1977, s Document No 4338375. Dow not affect this portion of Lot 1, Block 2. Item 14 - Property subject to covenants, conditions, restrictions, obllgatl -s provisions, nd du,iw easements contained In the Parking Lot Agreement, dated November 11, 1977, recorded December 2, 1977. it. For Proposad grading, drainage and erosion trd Informatlon, refer to the SR, Grading, Drainage and Surfacing An doted December 23, 2009, prepared by Hammel, Green and Abraham.-, Inc. fflo 01 diff! qg &� E s H Qy a F Q 8 � a s tigD m ra ao M 0 N N gEaz tj Sa �~ m 5 Ga t I _o rra n Y I ao � O Y w x B O U Z: Z: t o: V7: u E o, v 1' LO � O � act z 0 W O UY� CL FD 0 � = m C J a U CV x N O << Q mein w p > O Z ii LLI -0 M 0 _J z } a) Ova Q < 0 CLz O., z o � O Q C0 J " M � a O N ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOX LIGHT POLE GUARD POST Q 3`I((; - = CONIFEROUS TREE HANDICAPED PARKING U- L/..U✓.J..\J - TREELNE 0 40 80 J ry = SIGN 0 = TELEPHONE Box = BITUMINOUS SURFACE SCALE IN FEET e = TELEPHONE MANHOLE D FLARED END SECTION D = CONCRETE SURFACE 71 6ENCHMARK �..,- " "•:°- �'?.'�'F�.'� =- "".'_'i _JBASIS OF BEARINGS'`- : -::;' = TNH (Top Nut of Hya t) -the top the firo hydrant located the north Fa the purpose, of this e,rwy the meet easterly line of Lot 1, Block 2, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION, according > -- WY WIRE GRAVEL SURFACE nut of on side of Colonlal Way near the northeast comer of site. Elev.- 871.98 - feet (NGVD 29). to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County. Minnesota Is assumed to bear NOOT70'18'E. r .,NOTES 1. Fas seraph ownership Is waited In The Colonist Church of Edina, a Mtmente non- profit corpoalion 2 Area of property Is 256.772 q.ft. or 612 o,xee. 3. Property is abstract. 4. The property has access to Colonic] Way, o dedicated public street. 5. The address of the property h 6200 Colonial Way, Edina, MN 55436. 6. See Sheet 2 of 2 for Tree Inventory. 7. Above round ut9ltles how been field located as shown NI underground utility rvl s 1 dn the property haw attempted to be Feld located through the -A- of Gopher State On. Call pa ticket number 90196022. However, some f the utility eamponlea failed to field locate underground utility location. In those case, utilities shown are from City of Edna and previous cords. The surveyor makes no rantess that the under round ut8ltias shown eom rise all. h ulliltles In the area either In servl a or ,ban 12 a The suiveyor further does not wmrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact Ixation indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurately as poaelDle from information available. The wrwyor has not physically located the underground utilities. Prior to any excavation or digging contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site location (651- 454 - 0002). 8. Underground Fiber optic line rune north and south near the east line of the property. Location of line 1, per Fdd markin s In lace at the time of eurw . P 9 P Y 9. The property Ilw in flood zone X (arena determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood Plane) ae designated on Flood Insurance Rate Map Communlly Panel Number 2705300363E, City, of Edina, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency effective data September 2. 2004. 10. Item, pertaining to Schedule B Seetlon II of Commitment to Title from First American This Insurance Company. File No. NCS- 391079 MPLS, doted Moth 1, 2009: OItem 10 - Property subject to ssements for utility, drainage and ponding purp beas a as shown 10 an vi ecorded e recorded plot of COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION, r Octor 4, 1977 as Document No. 4321785 as shown hereon. Item it - Easement far drainage ditch puM-se together with any Incidental rights, In favor T The Village (now City) of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corpoation, ae contained in the Easement for Drainage Ditch, dated November 7, 1960, corded November 22, 1960 as Document No 3263251 In Book 2278 Decd, at page 548, d the Easement for Drainage Ditch, dated November 3 1960 recorded November 22 1960 as Document No. 3263252 In Book 2278 Deady at page 549. Does not affect this portion of Lot 1, Block 2. 12 Item 12 Property is subject to a lack of direct aooese to County Road No. 62 as shown by Can notion No. 384 Final Certificate dated August 21 1967 recorded August 25. 1967 as Document No. 3671986 In Back 2599 of Deeds at page 347 as shown hereon Item 13 - Easement for drainage and filtering system purposes, together with any Incidental rights, In favor of The Village (now City) of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, as o -alned In the Warranty Deed, doted February 2, 1977, s Document No 4338375. Dow not affect this portion of Lot 1, Block 2. Item 14 - Property subject to covenants, conditions, restrictions, obllgatl -s provisions, nd du,iw easements contained In the Parking Lot Agreement, dated November 11, 1977, recorded December 2, 1977. it. For Proposad grading, drainage and erosion trd Informatlon, refer to the SR, Grading, Drainage and Surfacing An doted December 23, 2009, prepared by Hammel, Green and Abraham.-, Inc. fflo 01 diff! qg &� E s H Qy a F Q 8 � a s tigD m ra ao M 0 N N gEaz tj Sa �~ m 5 Ga t I _o rra n Y I ao � O Y w x B O U Z: Z: t o: V7: u E o, v 1' LO � O � act z 0 W O UY� CL FD 0 � = m C J a U CV x N O << Q mein w p > O Z ii LLI -0 M 0 _J z } a) Ova Q < 0 CLz O., z o � O Q C0 J " M � a O N J ® 2009 RLK INC. . Tree Inventory � Iqd< 0o, The Waters Senior living of Edina o�' COLONIAL CHURCH ' ED /NA, MN Ten Numh.r Gw'Iwe Tee N.—h— Cnwriwc nwu el..... !`...A u..l.. Ten Numh— Cnw 1— nau N..... M.A N..l.. Tee Numh- Sewelwn nau alma —A N..l.. Tee Numhws Gweien naN N..n. !`..nA Ni.1.. ,Wt Hazkbn 11 1 3 Dead Branches 1002 Hxckbeny 12 1 2 Dead Branches 1003 Rxkbwiy 1 8 1 1 1004 FlkWry 1 6 1 1 1005 Hack 10 1 2 1008 11ackbany 12 1 1 1007 B—Ider 7 t 2 1008 Co,lorrwood 27 1 t 1009 Broader i I1 1 2 1010 Ash 14 1 1 1011 Ash 18 1 I 1 1012 Spruce 9 1 1 1013 Fur 10 1 1 1014 Hackbw 17 1 4 Bad Slit 1015 Podar 18 , 5 B..' ()--g. ! 1016 Poplar 19 1 1 ,017 Willow 17 I 2 1018 W.11- 14 1 2 1019 Elm 6 1 2 1020 B.W. 8 1 , 1021 Boxeldw 8 1 4 Beater DamWe 1022 W 110x1 I t 1 3 7Nn 10121 Willow 6 1 4 Top Broken 1024 Poplar 18 1 7 1025 Willow 72 , 2 1026 ZZ 10 1 3 _ -- 7627 Boxader 7 1 2 1028 P ar 20 1 1 1029 Boxader 1 7 1 t 1030 Podar 76 1 5 Beater D—pe 1031 Elm 7 1 1 1032 SiherM 6 , 2 1033 Willow 9 , 3 1034 Pplar 12 7 2 — 1035 Podar 27 1 1 1036 Elm 7 1 1 1037 Willow 17 , 5 Leaning 1038 P.O. 19 1 5 Beaver Dame 1039 Elm 1 1 2 1040 Willow 18 1 2 1041 Bmeldm 7 1 4 Dead Branches 1042 Elm 70 I , 1043 Boxader 70110 2 5 1644 Willow ,5 , 2 ,045 Willow 16 t 2 1046 Poplar i 19 7 2 1047 Po ar 22 1 1 1048 Poplar 19 , 1 1049 Boxekler 6 1 2 1050 80.elder 8 1 2 1051 Bo.ader 7/8 2 2 1052 Pa ar 25 t 1 1053 Podar 78116 2 1 1054 Boxader 9 1 2 Crooked 1056 Bmelder 12 1 2 Ctaoked lose Wilkrw 8 1 2 Thin 1057 Willow 10 1 3 L—ing 1058 Boxader 10 1 2 Trunk Damage 1059 Poplar 15 1 1 1060 P.O. I8/,9 2 1 1061 Boxelder 17 I 2 L.earartg-Good 1052 Buxelder 6 1 5 Beater Dame ,063 Boxelder 6 , 1 1064 Elm 21 1 1 1066 Bmelder 8 1 2 1066 B—Ider 8 1 3 L ,057 Podar 29 1 1 - 1068 Boxader 13 1 2 Trunk Darriage 1069 Boxader 14 1 1 1070 Boxelder 10172 2 1 1071 Boxader 10 1 1 — 1072 Bmelder 8 1 3 Leanft 1073 Willow 15 1 1 1074 P.Pl. 24 1 1 — MOM 1075 P.O. 11!22/24 3 1 1076 P.O. 18/74 1 2 1 1 077 Bmelder 7 1 2 Lean 1078 B—W r 14 1 I 1079 Boxelar 8 1 2 ®� 1080 Bmelder 9 1 2 Dead Branches 1081 Boxader 10 7 3 Berner Da mage 1082 Boxelder.- 8/9 2 2 1061 Boxelder 13 1 4 Beater Damge 1084 Box Mw 9 1 4 Satan Lean 1085 Willow 12 1 5 Hodzoaal Me Boxelder 11 1 4 Daad Branches 1087 - P ar 10 1 2 FtalfCanupy 1088 Podar 14 1 1 1089 Poplar 13 1 2 1090 Podar 11 1 2 7091 Podar 16/10/13 3 1 1092 Poplar 21/10/16 3 1 1093 P ar 15 1 1 1094 P.M. 9112 2 1 000 Podar 11 1 3 IM1095 Podar 17 -19 2 1 1097 Box elder 6 1 4 Beater Dartk-ge 1088 Willow 10 , 3 Leaarg 1099 P ar 1 16 1 1 O g l 99 l 8 0 x x o i � Y a b 41 o' ,n' o..jpg',�� W:i CM .080 o W� 08, z CLmp 0 CL c _ t$c N m 2 N 0Zr I MS .69 z ! . O ,Za z Zz w J M � n 0 u N ��oo© oo ©� ��000 ��000 0�0�� oo© ��000 ®00�� ��oo© oo ©� ��oo© oo ©� ��000 ®oo� MOM ®000 ��000 ®�oOO • -•• ©oo� ��000 0mo� moos 0�000� ®�oov ��aoo ®�000 ��000 oo© 0� ®� ��000 0om�� ®000 �0moo� ��000 000 ©� �000 ��000 ®000 o o© — m0© o o X00© �� ®00 ��000 ��oo© ��000 ®�000 ��00© ��000 0�0 ®�000 ®� 0�0 ®� ��000 000 ®� ��000 ®00O ©�I 0�000� �0000� 0�000� ®mo�� ®000 - 0�000� 000�� ®' D0O 000 ©- — ��oov� ®000 — MOM ®�000� ��000� 0�m ®� 0000 �omoo� �0000� ��000� 000 00- ©� �0moo� oMMC �0000� O g l 99 l 8 0 x x o i � Y a b 41 o' ,n' o..jpg',�� W:i CM .080 o W� 08, z CLmp 0 CL c _ t$c N m 2 N 0Zr I MS .69 z ! . O ,Za z Zz w J M � n 0 u N ��oo© oo ©� ��000 ��000 0�0�� oo© ��000 ®00�� ��oo© oo ©� ��oo© oo ©� ��000 ®oo� MOM ®000 ��000 ®�oOO ��oo© �oo� ��000 0mo� ®oo� 0�000� ®�oov ��aoo ®�000 ��000 oo© 0� ®� ��000 0om�� ®000 ��000 ��000 000 ©� �000 ��000 ®000 o o© — m0© o o X00© �� ®00 ��000 ��oo© ��000 ®�000 ��00© ��000 0�0 ®�000 ®� 0�0 ®� ��000 000 ®� ��000 �m000� 0�000� 0�000� ®mo�� 0�000� 000�� ®' �000- 000 — ��oov� ®000 — MOM ®�000� 0�m ®� 0000 O g l 99 l 8 0 x x o i � Y a b 41 o' ,n' o..jpg',�� W:i CM .080 o W� 08, z CLmp 0 CL c _ t$c N m 2 N 0Zr I MS .69 z ! . O ,Za z Zz w J M � n 0 u N ��oo© oo ©� ��000 ��000 oo© ��000 ��oo© oo ©� ��oo© oo ©� ��000 ®oo� MOM ®000 ��000 ®�oOO ��oo© �oo� ��000 ®oo� 0�000� ®�oov ��aoo ®�000 ��000 oo© ®moo© ��000 ®000 ��000 ��000 000 ©� �000 ��000 ®000 o o© — m0© o o X00© �� ®00 ��000 ��oo© ��000 ®�000 ��00© ��000 ®�000 ��oo© ��000 ��000 0�000� 0�000� ®' �000- 000 — ��oov� ®000 — MOM ®�000� ��000� 000 ©� oMMC O g l 99 l 8 0 x x o i � Y a b 41 o' ,n' o..jpg',�� W:i CM .080 o W� 08, z CLmp 0 CL c _ t$c N m 2 N 0Zr I MS .69 z ! . O ,Za z Zz w J M � n 0 u N ��oo© ��000 ��000 ��000 ��oo© ��oo© ��000 MOM ®000 ��000 ®�oOO ��oo© ��000 ��000 ®�oov ��aoo ®�000 ��000 ®moo© ��000 ®000 ��000 ��000 0 �000 ��000 o o© m0© o o X00© �� ®00 ��000 ��oo© ��000 ®�000 ��00© ��000 ®�000 ��oo© ��000 ��000 0�000� 0�000� ®' �000- ��oov� ®�000� O g l 99 l 8 0 x x o i � Y a b 41 o' ,n' o..jpg',�� W:i CM .080 o W� 08, z CLmp 0 CL c _ t$c N m 2 N 0Zr I MS .69 z ! . O ,Za z Zz w J M � n 0 u N 1/ S F f a ?f 1 A z 0 a r I I I ; I :a rG 1 I L =1 1 1 1 � I 1 y I I � I r I 1 � v., -- - -- -- -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- 11111111 �ffi -- ------- - -- - - - -- - - - -- -, I � i '. X.1 �s a THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING- Invilffillow"", F-099 DEMOLITION NOTES: 1. UTILIZE THE GOPHER STATE ONE CAL S`STLM 4 t- 80C- 48 HOOPS PRIOR TL PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION 2. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AT APPR]XIMATE LOCATIONS. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES MA) N0- BE SHOWN. PRIOR COMSTRUCTDN FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF UTLITIES THAT MAI PE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION. _ PROVIDE TEMPORARY ROON CONSTRUCTION EXIT AT A_ .RYA - -ONS W. HERE CONSTRU!'TICC TRAFFIC ENTERS PUBLI' POADWA`- 4, STORM SEWER INLETS MUST BE PROTECTEL WITH SILT FENCE, 94-E CHEC,S, OR OTHER EQUIVALENT METHODS UNTIL PERMANENT ,ROJNL COVEN IS ESTABLISHEC. 5. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTRO_ IN ACCORD.SNC= WT, THE MINNES^TA. MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INCLUOIN, THE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL 'ONE LAYOUTS FIELD MANUA_, DATED JANUAR" 20G7, A- A__ TIMES THA- CONSTRUCTI]N A_TT'4 -1' DISRUPTS TRAFFIC ON P UBLI:: ROADWAYS. 6. 13 RDINA = DISRUPTION O� PEDESTRAN AND VEHICJLA2 TRA == C WITH _OLONIA_ CHURCH. MTAW AL_ REDUMED STREE- AN SIDEWALK CL'' URE PERMIT'V - CONTA:' CITY TC 'JERIF• REQUIREMEN'S. T. CAR_ M -SI EE TA-4 OU -1143 CONSTRUCTION. TO PR:i EC SUP✓ =, MONUMFN'= AN.: PAUPER', IRONS. S. F,10-- ALL TR ==S NCT SPECIE-CAL_ DIGNAT=D FOR REMOVA_. S—,1T PAVEMENT THA- REMAINS AT RFI —A_ LIMIT'. IC PESTJP.E DP —PUN DA ED P.OACS, W'AL"_- _UFES. JTI ITIES, OR --ANT MAT_ P T;• ',ONUITION =OVAL -Z -T 3E7E? THAN -- -P- _CON37RJC.TION ^.JNDRION AND AS R_OJIR -O B- lWNER. I' COJPDNATT - ISP.;PTION 0= JTILIT- 3--PAC73 WITT- OWNER LIMIT SEP'✓'CE DISPJPTO'J TO TIM =S APPPO1 G S' OWNED. -- EZnchra -.�- w Imo" I s^ UTILITY CONTACTS: KEY NOTES: I. CENTERPJIN- ENE GI: ANDR-W'BALGORN QPROTE.:T 6 2- 321 -54 =6 QSAKUT PAVEMEN- ANDREW.SALGOBIN 3CENTERPOINTENERGY.COM QCOORDINATE REMOVAL /RELOCATION OF COMMUNI-:ATION '. COM-AS_ .ABLE: OR ENERG" UTILT WTTI UTILIT• CO. NELLY DOONAN 95 -60? -403 QREMOV= EXISTING STRJ-TURE NELL7 DOONANO -ABLE COMC.45:.CJM QREMUVE DON OWF C' MARK H- MESON M QREMOY= LIGHT POLE MARE H1_n1-} MAR4, - MM- 9:NS%OWEST.:OM QBULF.H-.4' - %I =TIN; PIPE A REMOV(� LIMITS 4, x F_ ENrRG QREMOVE DRIVE APRON DUSTIN 90PE,SI 952 -1329 -45]4 QNEMOI< CURB AND WALH AT NEW DRIVE APRON DUSTIN. HOREJSIOXCELENEF- OOM 10 REM01! _31100ULATED 5`_DIMET" AT STORM SEWER. OIJiI.Ei E 'T- Y EDINA. ROD= GLANZER QCL' AND PATCH STREE- FOP LTl_I -Y r:JNSTRJ_TON - RESTOF- STREFT IN .ACCORCACNE WIT- 0T, 0= ENNA REOUIREMEN TS THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING EF ;��I OF EDINA Proposed Scnior Housing on the Campus of The Colonial Church of Edinak noN NJMB_'n: rl lug w 30 C 30 6C• S =A_= IN .T LEGEND: —� —•— SIFT FEND X X REMOVE TREE SHRUB . ............ . : .: : REMOVE CURB X X X REMOV_ U /GROUND UTLIT- REMOV= FAVEMEN_ SAW CUT ..INE TREE PR.i TECTON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE DEMOLITION PLAN 3077- 001 -00 '�- AS SHOWN D- MAY 28, 2010 a+AWN R.WAIT C200 I -h, h f E. Edi- 3 1 d- N 101. , 1-h- - COLONIAL WAY 0 r. -E ABER S& Ca- W WNA PR. .1 - ...W, ASWU .. 97E _A: SF OR ACRES BOOR AREA RATIO, M S — AREA MADEE BY L11' APEA 24y OM/273.39-000 W� Fl� MIA 1 .2 OR Al.. ME.- 6= !! Sc REMIREMENM �' FRM7. 90E, REAR YARD% INCREASES "TH BUILDING HOGH- 116- I.D.W AREA SEE SECICW aW.- - 5C0E REO-RERn AN CAM AREA PROR043.669 Sc ERM-E• BUILDING ROW NC MAAMVW: H-T !S MIERMINM B" REMIRED .S W-REE BUY DNG -T V TIARR '� 11 �%l 51-5 3t V STALES ='.- 3TA__ .� L - SY-5 9G E.' 1 ITALL< - - iT.YL3 _j GENERAL_ NOTES FOR LAYOUT: 1. - DIMEN90t,- T, CURS 414i :JC _I,' M__ _Q TB_ = YYF �UPF E_�S _TTHEP N-0, EA_E � CAPE 13 T J.� 6-IN,5 8 - 11HU HL ALE --f GJ 2 10� -0� , - S' UTIJI. ! NEW CJ P-T= 5JR_ ACING: MAXIMUM �'AUNG J CfTRX MM= 1, 0- 8--UTAT PENERAU, kkk- �-- WA-, WITTH. TRAP MA VU J)NT' ;'. .ON: SLAR� W. BE VI-ET MAYIMUV EFAYING EXFMNSION ARN- T'. 2L X=tF T1, U_ AIL _3- E�jAL =A41 9_C. IF I" I.— rw PARKING SUMMARY T LEGEND THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING 'I z "lle" I'F I -T r:F1 '�Al FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE LAYOUT PLAN If _'RAH I OF EDINA ,,AT_P L1_ 3077-001 -00 �0 BDR11- -X 4 1 SENIOR LIVING' .......... ... .......... q ..... .. .. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus IC-11W AS SHOWN MAY 28. 2010 C300 .... .. .... . .. of The Colonial Church of Edina 114W - THE SHEET P_W#dT TAILE Fl-[ I THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING 'I z "lle" I'F I -T r:F1 '�Al FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE LAYOUT PLAN THEWATERS OF EDINA —0 I 0C 3077-001 -00 SENIOR LIVING' .......... ... .......... q ..... .. .. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus IC-11W AS SHOWN MAY 28. 2010 C300 .... .. .... . .. of The Colonial Church of Edina REVMION HMMY - THE SHEET P_W#dT I 111, IT 111-D is FrTFh nIV,� �RF.v wM� : :IV; III - SURFACING LEGEND LEGEND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN EARTHWORK NOTES' '. SEE SPECIFICATION SECBOK 310000 LAPTHWORY.. ���/�G9� �1T p �� p STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1 SUMMARY- T H EWA T E R S OF EDINA IMNNGT 2300; _ "''" 1 3077- col -o0 AND SURFACING PLAN '. FILLU VERIF1 UTILITY LOCATIONS PNIUR TI; CONSTRUCTION. I SITE AR<A = 6.1 -ACRES IMPERNUUS AR CA BEFORE PROJECT L9 ACRE: Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus -- _ - 'IURSE (MN /DO- ^_360: K A� H.;F - CLASS 5 (MN /p0- EXISTING INC`_T' :'DNTWR _ �- - - -J UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AR- STIOWM1 A- APPROXIMAT' LOCATIONS. IMPERMOU AREA AFTER PR,&( � 2.9 ACRES Y NUM REVISION HISTORY - THIS SHEET �' R•W47 2I11 ?. 111LI2 THE GOPHEF SURS ONE CAL S+STM AT PEA DI RANGES. ILIUM" WEAR COURSE (MN /D0 SvO: EXISTING CONTOJR '- BOO- ^52 -1t6F, 48 HOVRS PRIOR m cCRr ORMIN:- ANY 9E�HP '.N ],. ? - -30 MIN. O;- ?.4cfa G��9 scfa Oa�-16 Q,f= GUT1 IdITUMIN0U5 I NOM1 -WEAR CWRSc (MN /UJ 236U: E %STING Cv JTOJ ^ (REMG FC; A %T P N , Tc=1G MIN. G ?9 cfs 0 2020, 01- 32.30, ji1Z_P`BB'T. " AGGREGATE BAS CLA55 : (MN /DO 22+1'; 4 S= SHEET .100 SITE SURVE, FOP.. BENCHMAWE ./DETENTION ROUTING = C 1.2cf, Om 69crs 0-11 L, Svu E.EVATON +18.8 - ELEVATIONS ARE TPICALY GIVEN AT =1415H -: SUR=A•CE HW:-851.1 CABS 85_. -' G.752 853 C SiORAS OLUME 0132 ,o-r- C.dBG vf, G 752 a J )- ',URE. FL'vaTI0K5 ARE NOTC 00Th A "T:' CON CRET .ON :RET' PAVEMENT, U.N.O. REINFORCING NON_ PPO SF - JTnLIOS ', IN ^vMAL'•� 5. )WE. BU'..OING F ODP EL.VAT101. M..SI BEST :: FE ABOVE WATT AL M '. ME WOV'. ON -9 P '.5 R =' PAVvMENI :- 6 AGGREGATE BASE D =A M1A„E 4RR, W TIE 1411,- - MILE CREEI. ix YEAR Got:, E.= VA'I1Qf, 0 856.;- FEET. , ^ �...• REWIRED WI � _ A_RE� s _.c. � «.69[ C: PPROVED GRANT SUBGRADE ] A DRAFT GFOTFCHNICAL EVAN) nON REPORT WAS fOMPLFTED BY 10,521 t,F (I' RETENTION VULUML) - 13.369 C,F. PRDNDED 16.543 f �,^-- _ 1 6 CONrRFTF WALK, U.N.C. DRAINAGE DIVIDE BR AUK INTERTEC CORPORATION DATES OCTOBEP 5, 200. THIS I, -P , ONIAINS NFORMaTI'J1•. Oil SITE SO z POUNDWATEP. ANC WUV Ir.. 843.0• to 8500 • „F. 1:• �i CONCRETE .' WALK �R4EINFORCING NON =' AGGREGATE BASE P.- ]MM CAn JN ��? C.M'TRU ?ION STINT' NEP.ALL'i Ty STC SOL,' CONSS OF -. HGHL, VARAB. AYER •_ TILL 0 cR DN -: T- k�iFNT t%. VO M n'EDJIREV VOLUM_ _ 9 A::fiE_ IC.S.': C= _ IIAA PROVES !:RAN 114E $UB'T.PAD- IAv G_A.IA -Y DEPOS'TED SOI_�. FI ' '__ SOI_S WERE NOT EN UNTEP,EC THIS •ML” BE PP,'+VI(ir IN RIG-FI.I ATION AREAS ACIACFNT TO PANNC. PERMEABLE CONCRETE ^AVEMENT V'rR 4tING I+ G.ACIA_ 501_5 01• IH_ _AV PUPROK : THE SrL. INFI_TF.ATIOI. T..ENC-• ANG�O. RAINWATER STORA„E TAN,: FOP. IRRIGATION 3UPF PcRM =ABLE q" CHp %EF. 51UNE - 3"1_'4) THE 'D 40A 3D P VAR AB_E AND ^.DNS -T JF P: DI GRADE[ 5ANL POORL' ✓RADEC SANS WITH $ILT. 5 T- SANG. CL•'E'- $AND. STORAGE i85. •/ TO 85C_'� BEF•]R A.' ACRE -E-t �CONCF' -r G A .,REGAIE BASE - :321 24: SANOT LEAN C.A L_AN C,AY, AND SANC- 5IL pZEF 3.85 ACRE FEE- — t RE:.Af -JBB :.iE - 321'_ 111, IT 111-D is FrTFh nIV,� �RF.v wM� : :IV; III - - - -- .____. TC WATERS SENIOR LIVING H^EP. ^S FDM1 E C Ty A Lt� U- 1NP WA' PR -= `yV - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE GRADING, F DRAINAGE, T H EWA T E R S OF EDINA ` F " TAB,/{` _ _ "''" 1 3077- col -o0 AND SURFACING PLAN •1[.....•..;I.I..... SENIOR LIVING' I,• ..m n..AUU•. 1.•. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus —� -� AS SHOWN r MAY 28, 2010 a..• ,4,.••,.FFF4..... L .•,..FI,FFF of The Colonial Church of Edina Y NUM REVISION HISTORY - THIS SHEET �' R•W47 �� o 0 111, IT 111-D is FrTFh nIV,� �RF.v wM� : :IV; III COLONIAL WAY STOW SEWER STRUCTURESSICHEDULE STO w Rw CUT NOTE STOI ST112 111 846.5 IMP AIIIININ ST03 - amo IMP APRON STI 057.8 4=2 0 1RACY AVE CONSTRUCT OAR 11705 awl 654.6 EXISTIN Ir' SAN. STO SI Ewa 661.5 III 956.5 OLO 856.5 Tiew 11110.111 E .:OOPDINAIF Cf*Nf,'JIJN3 1, 'S-INC, UTILI-. - EIVQ WIILI IITILI- OWNER. STP WON 1115" 5500 STOIC 07.7 101.0 51 STOI1 856.5 65+.4 INI W4.0 ST812 11360 w" STPO - GMD WP APRON A STIFT, 05" owl 311122 w" 400" STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SCHEDULE Sri RIM WV. wr NOTE ST023 ST434 111 III 1151.0 650.8 SANITARY LFT STATION SW 11557 951.7 VERl`l BUILDING SIORW SANITAII AND WATER SERVICE AND ELEVATION: ITIPS MILD 851.0 0 1RACY AVE CONSTRUCT OAR 571127 8167 81 EXISTIN Ir' SAN. WPB-- STAINI amo 857.0 8611.0 wo 81 III E .:OOPDINAIF Cf*Nf,'JIJN3 1, 'S-INC, UTILI-. - EIVQ WIILI IITILI- OWNER. 27430 STP 1115" 5500 UTI-Iff- cASLIVLNT 51111 801.4 51 C TIHBASIN WITH STRII STF33 III 11164.0 - --86I.0 INI W4.0 STIPS -pg 74 SI 8666 S•'2 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES STO RIM .1 CUT MOUE UH-A MI 81 WI "'1 WV-8I SANITARY LFT STATION URI 1111 111111-06111 VERl`l BUILDING SIORW SANITAII AND WATER SERVICE AND ELEVATION: E-TING WATER ------------------------- 417503 INIV-1115I 0 1RACY AVE CONSTRUCT OAR NEW SANIFIAF,' SEWER 4. —DE MINIBILB, ).5 �,P ON ALL WATERMAJNi At WATFRWINI CONSTRUCTION MI C-5.PL WITH OT REO,J-wNT3. NEW STORM SNFR EXISTIN Ir' SAN. of The Colonial Church of Mos. N-EA WI E .:OOPDINAIF Cf*Nf,'JIJN3 1, 'S-INC, UTILI-. - EIVQ WIILI IITILI- OWNER. 7. '4F TABLE FOR OT111D iTRJUT•RE INFORMATION. UTI-Iff- cASLIVLNT ADJILST A- I,. Ft- VAIFOL, 1!4-INCF B= OW �INVSH:O SLJWAC=. MANHOLE WITH STRUCTURz A3RLWLN- Will] T IL CIT Jr -DINS. 1, RLQJIRLD FOR C3N-5lRJ--7N,4 C TIHBASIN WITH STRII SANIFAR SEWER WITHIN 10. FRI =ROI,i NINE MILE CRr-K WATFSH- DISTRICT. NIARO�IFTAN -OUN,.I- ENVIRONMENTAL SE FACE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. AND Off. O= 7DIM ARE �IIIRF" -11 TIl- -1121'T ST#12 A i 9N -1 I JTII C.VHFR STATE INF II S=Iv 6 Z.(,: 25-1-66. 4H HO''IRS PRIOR ;TA'. U 0 TIC PERFORMING "" -XCAVATICN. EXISTING � ITAPI 117WIF, - - - - - - - - - - gj_ — 0 MHV YY : 0 VERl`l BUILDING SIORW SANITAII AND WATER SERVICE AND ELEVATION: E-TING WATER ------------------------- -v SENIOR LIVING' ...... 1. ..... .. .. NEW SANIFIAF,' SEWER 4. —DE MINIBILB, ).5 �,P ON ALL WATERMAJNi At WATFRWINI CONSTRUCTION MI C-5.PL WITH OT REO,J-wNT3. NEW STORM SNFR AND STORM —ER 101,13TIRLICTON WiI WITH CTI RFXW MFNTS. of The Colonial Church of Mos. N-EA WI E .:OOPDINAIF Cf*Nf,'JIJN3 1, 'S-INC, UTILI-. - EIVQ WIILI IITILI- OWNER. 7. '4F TABLE FOR OT111D iTRJUT•RE INFORMATION. UTI-Iff- cASLIVLNT ADJILST A- I,. Ft- VAIFOL, 1!4-INCF B= OW �INVSH:O SLJWAC=. MANHOLE WITH STRUCTURz A3RLWLN- Will] T IL CIT Jr -DINS. 1, RLQJIRLD FOR C3N-5lRJ--7N,4 C TIHBASIN WITH STRII SANIFAR SEWER WITHIN 10. FRI =ROI,i NINE MILE CRr-K WATFSH- DISTRICT. NIARO�IFTAN -OUN,.I- ENVIRONMENTAL SE FACE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. AND Off. O= 7DIM ARE �IIIRF" -11 TIl- -1121'T ST#12 qNW- Sc1' IN FEE- UTILITY NOTES: LEGEND I JTII C.VHFR STATE INF II S=Iv 6 Z.(,: 25-1-66. 4H HO''IRS PRIOR ;TA'. U 0 TIC PERFORMING "" -XCAVATICN. EXISTING � ITAPI 117WIF, - - - - - - - - - - EXICTING UNDER.ROUNC. UTILITIES ARE SHOWN A- APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. ALL EXISTING JI ", NOT B7 SHOWN VERIF1 LOCATION AND LIFVABON OF UTILITIES E%STINT- STORM SEWEP - - - - - - - -- - - - IWArTED 8' CONSIRVCnON. °RIOP TO PLAIING NEW `11E OR I STRUCTURES. VERl`l BUILDING SIORW SANITAII AND WATER SERVICE AND ELEVATION: E-TING WATER ------------------------- WITf PLLJMBNJ� CONTRACTOR. DRIOP. IT. �ON�.wwi, Jr srwCEES. SENIOR LIVING' ...... 1. ..... .. .. NEW SANIFIAF,' SEWER 4. —DE MINIBILB, ).5 �,P ON ALL WATERMAJNi At WATFRWINI CONSTRUCTION MI C-5.PL WITH OT REO,J-wNT3. NEW STORM SNFR AND STORM —ER 101,13TIRLICTON WiI WITH CTI RFXW MFNTS. of The Colonial Church of Mos. N-EA WI E .:OOPDINAIF Cf*Nf,'JIJN3 1, 'S-INC, UTILI-. - EIVQ WIILI IITILI- OWNER. 7. '4F TABLE FOR OT111D iTRJUT•RE INFORMATION. UTI-Iff- cASLIVLNT ADJILST A- I,. Ft- VAIFOL, 1!4-INCF B= OW �INVSH:O SLJWAC=. MANHOLE WITH STRUCTURz A3RLWLN- Will] T IL CIT Jr -DINS. 1, RLQJIRLD FOR C3N-5lRJ--7N,4 C TIHBASIN WITH STRII SANIFAR SEWER WITHIN 10. FRI =ROI,i NINE MILE CRr-K WATFSH- DISTRICT. NIARO�IFTAN -OUN,.I- ENVIRONMENTAL SE FACE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. AND Off. O= 7DIM ARE �IIIRF" -11 TIl- -1121'T I THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING ;TA'. U 0 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE UTILITY PLAN THEWATERS ICY Z— 3077-001-00 OF EDINA SENIOR LIVING' ...... 1. ..... .. .. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus AS SHOWN MAY 25, 2010 C500 of The Colonial Church of Mos. REVISION HISTORY - THIL= RNAIT I r LEGEND: UiIC[ DECOM DAISORY 7BEE - Bllfl GNE RED HBC D BISM D GERR . RED RSUG R MPG H6 . [ I NFbIIY OEL00005 GFASIOR! TEE - LEIX1l BFCR. eM/i NWF f if 9W1 /YFDeM CECpg08 ORNVFRIK TREE - WE1004' S WN. 'MT-C DUNOWD A4FW. YAMCFHRRr. OVArPRE. W!eIX01e1 - Y ml ®m e' ILL BB ± mNHamlJS nEE - SW.a. PIE FR. QI11R ARBORNIAE - e' N. w 0EC8NA)IR SHRUB - SKIG,H SW T, S AA HERN SLYAC• NAIDHIR, GREY CHCNCCNDdN, NIINTlBERRY, BVCKFERRY, RA9Pff1M! .a��••.R.s.y91 BARBERRY. WILD ROSE. PIGOGI DOLWODO. SNREA LIMO - ,,/'lY CENIRF1ElG SHRUB - RAPER. YEW, ARBOMME OEEWKNT.N OIt4 - iFAT {R REED GRASS. — MISS STWIBI- ": �'•' AIO t]QAW RBecN fAl4 - 1 I OR N arR. NO - GRDNTOrvADa, PERENNWS - IOSTA GNULY. JPNE9E snJRCx - 1, mR. ^ ,\ Y fJosw OEclB IRfT SVR /6 EASBNG CONFER). WE THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING' KEY NOTES MAINTENANCE EWE. ROCK NUICH AND METAL EGGING - ,B' WIDE WATER FEATURE. TYP. RETAINING WALLS. TYP. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTS'. SINI, BE PLNRm WITH BASIN "'U"' U.N.O. PLANTS 2. ALL TS SHALL HAEE SPADED EDGE - B' DEPTH UN.O. 3. ALL PUNTS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. 4. ALL AREAS WIMIN THE PROPERTY LINE NOT SHOWN AS SOWED WILL BE SEEDED WITH NATN4 GRASSES LEGEND: ATFA ro tE SDDOED LOl WIII K!:' qiY mMEAKI ®T/JAC111.!fAEC E@ ROC' tlACYIO PRSAIWB TRFC3IOrPelnenbl AC DedauouE,[mHereu 24 C31CC_O. FM e' M1E. C1NR AS SHOWN 46GM 3 GREEk NCIiNTAW SGGAR NAPE 2 5cal BB 483XDSYN Per aaeeh MOw. ' GT 2 MPERA: NIXN EYLOLUST (PEJRE lu Yrycoe' ...2'ca. BS AS SHO'NN .!/ 8 USTERN NN RCD REDCCOAR 6M1f. STAIR A83HOWN NOW xPPa.PS N.aaa 28 LOWLLC WYNV.N GFBAP?E 2... cx. BB AS SHCWN PROUSSY�P i.`O•VM i — CPA 4PPF IS ..—,A 3B 495H0' /iH W`F PG PURPEEPRINCE CPAeA'fLE +Aa CK .td[ SPRUCE Tf B:ALK:HLLS SPRUCE ..B Ca. 3B AB SY.CW% BN:. C1Nfl AS SXCS"!H Pkea dausa tlenxb PS .] FASTEPAI —1 PINE P'naa artobus Sh:. CTNR 43 SHOWN pq sC 6 \'YAMR Yi u,IE GK 2.6'cal. BB AS SHOWN IDT. B BUR OAos Pi[dx N [W 25' 80 A$ SHAWN WRR Q TOP P PYPAME]4: APRORVRAE 4'N BB AS SNOWS SNC1E tEAEJER TO YR D:w— m'+..E -, . NNH, 8 YEL OW RBBON MSIXiVITAr a H.. SS AS 6HO'.NN SNGLE LEADER TPHE c= itlarEahs YeW.w Ri6bwY SHRUBS (Dodd— CPM. —) CS1 2: GAYTICCG %iCOO f ^.sa OS CTNR AS SHOWN HM 14 8 E +iD1E563vRYMEP� /OWrNOU LESS [S C?:R AS $HO'NN JCO E6'•Rrgw nwr.r.YA:YBe nwrrroi Ze LAUSB FP.CST° AS CTU AS BHCNN .PEP cEl"' DAASFP;s.YW JCGL tf GO_C'UCE X:NPER WS OTR AS SFGNS JCM JIr.S'1U:PSR :Pa:xA 22 144+:£V J�ttPER AS CTAR AS SH.O'N% li JHB MPE :] 0'.0 PRRCE AR Jea Ra-zrcKais 'Blro P:s[e' AB CTNR AS BHCNN :E HUGHE(3 -E8 LNFER rt: CTNR 485HDYN JA W'HSM JS8 JCS 3f HLUE STAR ''-JN PER e'b�ue SY/ IC 9 OR£EH -1Y.R E8 LTNR AS BHOI'iN AS c AB SHOWN SBG F See Gsr.' !OF GO:Ci S?REA W3 CTNR AS SHOWN b SNOWANONAMwP ,oax«[e sN PA SN9JiM71HD SPRLS $ANH epee $1ISSAN i.TT K CT:R AS sH.O'.'fN S'' /R RE ]E VANHDUT� RENABBUICE SPREA ARI CTNR 4391:OWN s R xa' SNP it AIAR KOREAN LILAC Ti AS Sf0NS S- AIRA.P SPEW Y L(1NAIC \YV—IIA :I0.0 K CniR AS SY.(iNN ByPPr aCaved WYL. VTBL TAN11 ]] COMPACT AM—.."ICIRNUM a8 CTNR A681:OWN Y »rwn l.Y:dwP 3RT+Y Cdnps[F A . THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING ` +` 0 - OF EDINA ,.. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus ,,Af ; E,,, of The Colonial Church of Fdina,, ,,, HJN3E4 REVISION HISTORY - THIS SHEET FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLANTING PLAN GAIN M? wn -oo1 -00 oh ANY 28, 2010 E L201 1 / EPEawI. .SPASWV \_/ . •,; 4;:HI NAMME ��E�'. ��nll+ :�H'�h��ll� '..I ^1.. �a � 1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN THEWATERS SENIOR LIVING- r. THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus of The Colonial Church of Edina FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3077- 001 -00 1 /ts• - r -o• MAY 28, 2010 OHLEBICHUK GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A200 v THEWATERS, SENIOR LIVING- 1.0 THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus (C 10 17.. of The Colonial Church of Edina 1 11 �.Umm FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAIN LEVEL 3077-001-00 FLOOR PLAN DHLEBICHUK ---D A201 v R ;ECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN z16'' . . ............ THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING - El FF - - , L4 CIT OJJA VU FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN THEWATERS EDINA 41 3077-001-00 OF SENIOR LIVING' ...... .. .. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus MAY 28. 2010 of The Colonial Church of Edina DHLEBICHUK A202 IT I_MFI :' Ii N R H 8 PlI THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN �-- THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING EREe "� IND - �T?� °`oF E ,E FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN THIRD LEVEL H EWA T E R S F H- ;T •> FLOOR PLAN � aon- oo, -oo T OF EDINA A "•` "� SENIOR LiVINC' •.••• •,�. Proposed Scnior Housing on the Campus s - _ -� Lt war ze, zo, o yr A2�3 °"'' >�i�,••• of The Colonial Church of Edina R o RoMe_R: REVISION HISTORY - THIS SHEET DHLee,cnuK NORTH ELEVATION EAST >�`h FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXTERIOR T H EWA T E R S THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA ` ,ji ELEVATIONS — :�uu 3077 -- 001 -00 .. a ..i. .. _ . SENTOR LIVING' V 1/16 — 1-0. Proposed Senior Housing on the Campus o °r wr 26, tot D A400 ,,,, of The Colonial Church of Edina �w DHLEEICHUK • ••• •,,• o,, xoaea -. RFVTSION HISTORY - THTS SHFFf w SOUTH ELEVATION I, -,. _ .. 1, WEST ELEVATION I11 - J _ THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING GUS k -- - `` FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS THEWATERS OF EDINA `vO� ``� 1. - /�\ son— oo1—oo _u SENIOR LIVING' •��••••• ^r •�••.•••••• .... Pmposcd Senior Housing on the Campus .r MAY 2e, 2010 A401 °" - �• of The Colonial Church of Edina il�A . H TM SHEET DHLEBICHUK The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 28 MAY 2010 VIEW `A' - LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CHURCH WITH VEGETATION The Waters Senior Living of Edina [fA. at the Colonial Church of Edina 28 MAY 2010 4 �! r, 44. • , • r 0 ltiy r -: 77W7 - —_ 0 _r..-� - _ a n3 �r r c. OIL The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina — I's VIEW `A1' - LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CHURCH 28 MAY 2010 r VIEW `B' - LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM TRACY AVENUE BRIDGE WITH VEGETATION The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 28MAY2010 -w.. 1 1 f. VIEW `B1' - LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM TRACY AVENUE BRIDGE The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina 28 MAY 2010 y VIEW `C' - LOOKING SOUTHWEST ACROSS PARK WITH VEGETATION The Waters Senior Living of Edina [fA. at the Colonial Church of Edina 28 MAY 2010 The Waters Senior Living of Edina at the Colonial Church of Edina VIEW `C1' - LOOKING SOUTHWEST ACROSS PARK 28 MAY 2010 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED TH AS OF 11 :00AM,JUNE 25. COLON, THE WATERS OF 62,00POLONIAL WAY �a Jackie Hoogenakkee From: bill cosgrove <bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 2:18 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Letter to Edina City Council and Planning Commission Members Please pass on this email to,all the City,.Leaders listed below. Thank you Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning, Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton June 19, 2010 Dear City Council Members and Planning Commissioners, I am a relatively recent resident of Edina. My wife and I moved in fewer than three years ago. During this time, we've been especially curious about and alert to public and civic activities in our new community. As a result, we've noticed some things about Edina as a city that we might not have noticed otherwise. First, the city seems.well -run with attentive administrators, hardworking and interested elected representatives; reasonable and sensibly restrictive'city codes and statutes, and a dynamic citizenry participating in city activities, changes, and growth. The result is beautiful parks, well - preserved open spaces, well- situated, carefully planned homes, and controlled development emphasizing residential and single - family dwellings. Virtually all commercial and business ventures seem designed to respect the primacy of residents, families, and flourishing neighborhoods. A second thing I have noticed is the surprising ease with which changes in neighborhoods are allowed. Specifically, we were surprised to learn that our neighborhood apparently has a part of it being rezoned from R -1 at the behest of a church -- Colonial Church of Edina -- in order to allow The Shelter Corporation to build a large commercial building for senior citizens. It seems that Colonial Church wishes to produce immediate income from the sale of its land and ongoing income from the business the large building will generate. In spite of our,alertness to activities in our new neighborhood, we were unaware of the process of this change from the R -1 designation until a neighbor called it to my attention in March. This process did not seem to us to be in keeping with what we had heard, seen, and grown to expect of the city's attentiveness to transparency during our 2+ years in Edina. Third, what has become apparent in the meantime is that this process of changing the zoning is to facilitate the construction of a large commercial building that is strikingly at odds with the neighborhood we moved into in size, height, appearance, and use. What is now being called The Waters Senior Living of Edina is too large for the space and neighborhood, we feel, and its for - profit nature is inappropriate to its surrounding R -1 residents. While my wife and I are retired and perhaps destined for some form of retirement community in the future, the proposed Waters project -- presently 139 units; 3 stories, 200 yards long, and over 200,000 square feet -- is far too excessive, expensive, and much larger than we would ever want to live in. And clearly inappropriate for the nature and spirit of the immediate surrounding neighborhood. The size and scope of the proposed commercial building and business will generate heavy traffic flowing around three sides of Countryside Park. We have made good use of this park, and are glad to hear that it is slated to be extensively upgraded into one of the city's foremost parks. More traffic, more noise, more pollution, however, can only detract from this valuable public area which is so busy this summer with tennis players, basketball players, children in tt. play area, and Little Leaguers playing baseball games watched by hundreds of parents. It is my understanding, moreover, that Edina's Comprehensive Plan, the outline adopted some years ago to guide the city's future growth, requires that development be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. I take consistent to mean it should also be compatible and complementary to the immediate area. As other cities have shown, if properly planned for and managed, development can make a great city like Edina even better in future years. But by its very magnitude this proposed facility goes far beyond the guidelines the city has set for sustainable development. And once this huge building is underway, once the trees are cut and excavation begun, it may be too late to reverse such a compromising of this beautiful residential area of Edina. I am writing to all of you as members of the Edina City Council and Planning Commission to respectfully request that you reject this plan proposed by The Shelter Corporation to construct a too - large, incompatible, inappropriate, and unnecessarily intrusive building in the middle of Edina. And to impress upon its representatives that any such building should be of appropriate proportions, compatible with the residential neighborhood in appearance and use, and complementary to our own homes and other surrounding structures. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bill and Peggy Cosgrove 6104 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 Bill Cosgrove Professor Emeritus of English North Dakota State University 6104 Tracy Ave. So. Edina, MN 55436 952- 929 -1393 bill.cosgrove@ndsu.edu Jackie Hoo enakker From: ssstrand @comcast.net Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:43 PM �QV To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: case file 2010.0001.10a To: City of Edina Planning Dept. As a property owner at 6236 Crescent Drive I am NOT voting for business rezoning and construction of a 3 -story 139 -unit convalescent home. As a parent of small children who value and use Countryside Park additional traffic henders safety concerns. Any future plans considered to facilitate traffic flow via stop light at Olinger/Tracy and Colonial Way/Tracy would not be possible because of the nearby Fire Station. Thank you, Sharon Strand J From: Sent: To: Subject: Here is another.... ker Cary Teague Thursday, June 24, 2010 1:47 PM Jackie Hoogenakker FW: Oppose the existing Waters Development From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday; June 24, 2010 12:42 PM To: Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague Cc: Susan Howl;.Arlene Forrest; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter; Julie Risser; Karwehn Kata; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer; Michael Schroeder; Nancy N.'Scherer; Stev&Brown Subject: FW: Oppose the existing Waters Development Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Gordon Hughes, Cary Teague and the Planning Commission members.. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 15 D www.citvofedina.com D From: Jeanne.StPierre [ mailto :Jeanne.StPierre @target.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:16 PM To: Lynette Biunno; Jackie Hoogenakker. Subject: Oppose the existing Waters Development I am writing to voice my opinion reg arding. the proposed waters development. In the interest of space and your time I have not included the letter from Dan Rasmus, Attorney At Law that was sent to you on 5/28 but I agree with all of it and oppose the development`as it_is planned. The paragraph of that letter that begins with "The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever... ".is especially important. The city is concerned that families are not moving into Edina because the older people are not moving out. One big reason that families with small children are not moving into Edina is because of the cost of housing. OUR. Countryside neighborhood is one of the few neighborhoods that families CAN afford. If this large-facility is built as planned, common sense tells us all thatthe traffic will increase around the neighborhood. Families DO NOT want to.•move into areas that have a lot of traffic. (I know there have been traffic studies done but one needs to think about this realistically and with common sense. There will be much more traffic). love our city. I know that budgets are tight all over and this would be good revenue for our city. (This would be a windfall for Colonial). Please consider a smaller development in that area. You would all get my votes in the next election. Thank you. Please pass on my email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague Honorable Mayor James Hovland 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Dot Kerzner <dkerzner @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 6:31 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Fw: Please forward to Planning Commissioners Hi Jackie, I was told that you are tracking things now and that we should send you copies. I believe this has already been forwarded everyone; it is just for your records. Thank you. Dot - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: "Dot Kerzner" <dkerzner @comcast.net> To: <edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:12 PM Subject: Please forward to Planning Commissioners • Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown • Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter • Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer • Planning Commissioner Arlene Forest • Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel • Planning Commissioner Julie Risser • Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer > Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin > Staunton > Dear Commissioners: • I wish that zoning still operated under the application of the common • law of nuisance because it best describes the way I feel about Shelter • Corporation's proposed Living Waters senior apartment building : it's • a nuisance, not noxious in itself, but it is an example of " the • right thing in the wrong place." • While realizing the planning process isn't perfect -how could it be • when it requires total knowledge of sociology, economics, • demographics, geography, and everything else, plus perfect • foresight - -I have to ask why isn't more community input sought from • the people who actually live in the neighborhood? • I thought the City protected the character and symmetry of its unique • neighborhoods. One important quality that attracted us to Countryside • was that it is a purely residential neighborhood, one without > commercial activity. If we wanted to live in neighborhood with > commercial activity we would have chosen to live in a different part of Edina. > If the Shelter Corporation Living Waters project goes forward as 2 ECEIV rnr�� 07 • proposed it will be to the detriment of Countryside's unique • character, which will in turn, be a loss for Edina. Jane Jacobs, the • author of "The Death and Life of Great American Cities," expresses my • fears best: "Every place becomes more like every other place, all • adding up to Noplace." • Please preserve the character, symmetry, and aesthetic quality of • Countryside neighborhood. • Please do not permit the Shelter Corporation - Living Waters project • to go forward as proposed. > Sincerely, > Dorothy Kerzner > 5828 Jeff Place > 952 - 221 -1893 Jackie Hooctenakker From: Dot Kercner <dkerzner @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 6:33 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Fw: Please forward Hi, This is just another one for your records; everyone has received it. Thank you. Dot - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: "Dot Kerzner <dkerzner @comcast.net> To: <edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 1:17 PM Subject: Please forward > Please forward this email to the City Leaders listed below. Thank you! • Gordon Hughes, City Manager • Honorable Mayor James Hovland • Council Member Joni Bennett • Council Member Mary Brindle • Council Member Scot Housch • Council Member Ann Swenson • Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown • Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter • Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer • Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest • Planning Commissioner Floyd, Gabriel • Planning Commissioner Julie Risser • Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer • Planning Commissioner Michael Shroeder • Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton > Dear Planning Commissioners, Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: > Yesterday on my lunch break I spent an interesting half hour at the Edina > Senior Center, which, I was surprised to learn, falls under the auspices > of Parks and Recreation. I had a very nice conversation with Susan, the > Center's only full -time employee, and two gentlemen she brought into the > conversation. > They asked me if I was looking for information for a parent (I was > thankful they didn't ask me if the packet of information I had gathered > was for myself :) and I said yes. > > During our conversation, I asked them what they thought is the biggest 1 > obstacle seniors face in Edina -was it housing, medical care,, shopping? - > What? What was their opinion? > To which they replied: > "Nah, there's no shortage of housing for seniors. There's condos and > apartments all over the place. What we need is transportation."., Me: "I > have an acquaintance who lives on York Ave and she loves the bus that runs > between her building and the, shopping area." "Yes, that's the BeeLine. > Those busses only go up as far. as Fairview, even though we've asked a > million times for the route to come up here." "It's great for the people > who live in thatarea, but everyone else is out of luck:" "And there's > only i30 parking spaces at the Center here; that's whythe library lot is > always so full:'' "Everybody drives:" > Transportation -not housing. > > Please do.not permit the Shelter Corporation proposed apartment building > to go forward'as proposed. > > Sincerely, >..Dorothy Kerzner > 5828 Jeff Place > > Jackie Hooaenakker From: Susan <spetersen4 @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:55 PM O To: Jackie Hoogenakker C c Subject: Fw: Waters Senior Housing - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Lynette Biunno To: Susan Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:27 AM Subject: RE: Waters Senior Housing Dear Susan, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members, City Manager Gordon Hughes and the Planning Commission members. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com From: Susan [mailto:spetersen4 @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5 :15 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: anne Mccoy Subject: Waters Senior Housing I am a concerned citizen who is opposed to development for senior commercial building in a residential area. I have lived in Edina for over 30 years and can't understand why you want to destroy our neighborhood. Our neighborhood is just off Tracy and we already have to! deal with heavy traffic and by putting in a hugh senior building, it will only make it worst. I have never heard of a city changing their comprehensive plan to accommodate a hugh commericial building for a church. It is totally unreasonable to build such an enormous commercial building on church property in a residential neighborhood. Susan Petersen 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sent: To: frabonimn @earthlink.net Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:00 PM Lynette Biunno Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Waters Senior Living Project Please pass this e-mail on to the city leaders listed below: Gorden Hughes, City Mgr. James Hovland, Mayor Council Members: Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Scot Housh Ann Swenson Planning Commission Members: Stephen Brown Jeff Carpenter Michael Fischer Arlene Forrest Floyd Gabriel Julie Risser Nancy Scherer Michael Schroeder Kevin Stauton Dear City Leaders: �U D I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed Waters development and rezoning of the Colonial Church property per the plan submitted by Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. I, like many others in surrounding area, am not opposed to a more suitably -sized project which would be more in line with residential neighborhood. The project, as proposed, is very large and is not consistent with a residential area. The zoning, if changed, would set a very poor precedent in allowing commercial, for profit projects to invade what had been exclusively residential. Other oppositional issues ( already brought up by other residents) include lack of community involvement in the rezoning process, rushed timelines in preliminary approval, traffic concerns related to a large commercial enterprise, lack of coherence with a proposed Comprehensive City Plan and the further potential impact of the Nine Mile Creek bikepath on this same area. For these and other reasons, I urge the planning commission and the city council to reject the Waters Project as proposed and consider a more suitable development that would fit into the character of the neighborhood. A much smaller senior project - possibly non- profit - would be welcomed and needed in our community. Sincerely, Ron and Barb Fraboni 5505 Grove Street frabonimn @earthlink. net 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sent: To: Subject: Begin forwarded message: Kirk Swenson <kswenson7 @comcast.net> Monday, June 21, 2010 5:35 PM Jackie Hoogenakker Fwd: Waters senior living complex - Three Rivers Bike Trail From: Kirk Swenson <kswenson7(aD-comcast.net> Date: June 17, 2010 8:43:47 PM CDT To: edinamailaci.edina.mn.us Subject: Waters senior living complex - Three Rivers Bike Trail To: Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd. Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Gordon Hughes, City Manager I am writing to you to express my concerns relative to the senior housing project and bike trail proposed for my neighborhood. With regards to the senior living complex I have the following concerns: The size of the project will bring increased congestion to the neighborhood resulting in someone recommending stop lights at various intersections. Many senior housing projects are financially currently distressed, what happens if demand is not met, do the developers have the ability to maintain the property, will tennant qualifications be relaxed. Will section 8 be allowed? A shiny new building is appealing now, what happens in 20, 30, 40, or 50 years, when the facility can no longer garner the high rents anticipated. It seems that a facility of this size, if allowed to deteriorate could create a concentration of lower income housing, diminishing home values, destroying a strong neighborhood. With regards to the bike path I have the following concerns: _ 1 Bredesen Park has been a neighborhood asset to families for many years. The bike path is used by families with small children. My fear is that the proposed bike path may increase use of Bredesen's paths by avid bike enthusiasts who tend to ride at higher speeds making it unsafe for families to use the Bredesen bike path. Thank you for the opportunity to provide`input. I trust that you will consider the long term affects these proposals may have on a strong neighborhood and act prudently. Orice these initiatives are completed we will not be able to reverse the adverse affects these proposals may have on the neighborhood. Kirk Swenson 2 JUNE 3, 2010 TO: MAYOR HOVLAND, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS FROM: SPENCER. A. TURNER 6208 HILLSIDE RD. 952 - 929 =6216 . The June 2, 2010 edition of the Minneapolis Star Tribune carried an article titled "Edina Residents help guide city on redeveloping neighborhood." It seems contradictory to me that some Edina citizens are being asked to "help shape the future of a neighborhood" while other citizens are feeling that they have no say in the future of their neighborhood. I'm referring to the proposed senior citizen assisted living center that will. be located,next to Countryside Park. This facility has been in the planning stage for three and one half years, according to Ted Yoch. Yet area residents were only, informed of it in December of 2009 when the plan was ready to submit to the Planning Commission. A rezoning of the area from residential to PRD5 was given preliminary approval by both Planning and City Council We had no say as to,the potential impact of rezoning either now, or in the future, on the neighborhood. Concerned area residents were incensed! A neighborhood association opposing the size of the project was formed and now represents over 300 e-mail members (potentially representing over 600 residents assuming 2 persons per household). In March, 2010, some members of the Planning Commission, all of the City Council members plus the Mayor met with some of the Countryside neighbors at the site of the proposed project to hear our concerns. At those meetings we were urged by our elected city representatives to meet and try to negotiate a compromise with Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation. The Countryside group, through much effort and registered letters from our attorney to the principals of the project, did finally manage to arrange two ".town hall" type meetings on May 18 and May 20 to express our concerns about the project. Both meetings. had standing room only attendance. As a result of those two meeting a third meeting was scheduled on May 25 with Ted Yoch from Colonial, Jay Jensen from Shelter Corporation and the Steering Committee from the Countryside Neighborhood Group. The Countryside group was hopeful that we were moving toward a negotiated compromise. But it was not to be. At that third meeting the Steering Committee was lectured about the "great" changes that had been made in the preliminary. plan. At the beginning of the Meeting Mr. Yoch told us, "If I were in your position I would be declaring victory right now." There was no chance for us to. discuss a counter proposal and then come to some sort of a compromise.with their plan. We were informed that this was the FINAL plan and that it would be submitted to the Planning Commission by May 28 (which it was). The fact of the matter is that the reductions in the size of the building were minimal and do not decrease by much the enormous footprint this building will have on Countryside Park as well as the entire neighborhood. Here let me state that the Countryside group did not and does not dispute Colonial's right to develop its property. We only object to the massiveness of the project that would be placed in a residential area of one and two story homes. One of the unique features of this neighborhood is Countryside Park. The park is a drawing card to the neighborhood. In fact, Edina's park system of twenty -six parks is very unique and a drawing card for young families to the City. Only four of Edina's twenty -six parks have any exposure to or sight of commercial developments. The construction of a three and four story (as now planned) apartment building in full view of the park would destroy the unique character of'the park and the neighborhood. Area residents, even after the three meetings in May, feel that our concerns . as stakeholders in the Countryside neighborhood have not been taken seriously by the decision makers at Shelter Corporation and `Colonial Church. We respectfully ask the Planning Commission to table the approval of the "final development plan as.submitted by Shelter. Send both parties back to'the negotiating table to devise a plan thatis win, win for Shelter, Colonial, Edina and the Countryside stakeholders. lackie Hoogenakker From: Brian Barry <BBarry@Haemonetics.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:00 PM To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us.; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina 1st Addn Thank you, Brian Director of National Accounts, Donor Division North American Blood Bank Mobile: 413 - 219 -3358 From: Brian Barry Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:57 PM To: 'mailto :edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us'; 'mailto:jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina 1st Addn Dear J. Hovland, J. Bennett, M. Brindle, S. Housh, and A. Swenson and the Edina Planning Commission, This is my second message to this group regarding this topic and'l found it humorous the only person that responded was the one who did in fact vote against the re- zoning. I guess when you are wrong and you cannot defend your position it is best to remain silent; maybe most of you should have practiced that when it was time to vote for the project. I am writing you again to formally inform you of my extreme dissatisfaction with you and.the governing body of Edina. As a resident of Edina I am appalled that you would arbitrarily rezone land to allow a non- profit organization to build a for - profit senior center at the cost of the neighborhood. The residents of Edina do not want this structure built, as evidenced by the sizable and vocal opposition to the project. It seems the only people in favor of the project are those who stand to benefit financially from it; including the planning commission; the city council, mayor and members of Colonial Church; two thirds of whom do not even live in Edina. I am.beyond irate that you have put the financial desires of of Colony Church ahead of the wants and needs of the local community. You should be ashamed. Do not allow this project to proceed. Do not build this 139 units on the once R1 land and in my neighborhood, rezone some land in your neighborhood and build it in yours if you want it that badly. Or better yet just convert all R1 land for commercial development, why this one, WHY? You are failing those you are supposed to represent. Brian P. Barry o C�6C�01�/C�U Jackie Hoogenakker From: Cary Teague Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 8:01 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Yard Sign Opposition to The Waters Development Attachments: Signs Tracking Only - by street 062110.pdf Please attach the "yard sign roster" to this email when you copy it for the file. Thanks! From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:28 PM To: Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague Cc: Susan Howl; Arlene Forrest; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter; Julie Risser; Karwehn Kata; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer; Michael Schroeder; Nancy Nyrop Scheerer; Steve Brown Subject: FW: Yard Sign Opposition to The Waters Development Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Gordon Hughes, Cary Teague and the Planning Commission. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 www..-itvofeJina.com From: Kevin McCoy [mailto:kmccoy2 @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:03 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhoogenakken @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Yard Sign Opposition to The Waters Development Hello, Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague Jackie Hoogenakker Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Hello City Leaders of Edina and Ms. Hoogenakker, We want you to have the Yard Sign roster (attached as a separate PDF) which represents between 368 and 490 property owners /residents /taxpayers /voters in the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group that are opposed to the previous and current revised plans, and what it means to display a Yard Sign in front of your home. The Yard Signs are to inform and demonstrate to residents and City Leadership that there are a significant number of residents in this area that opposed the previous Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation Living Waters Plans, and currently oppose the Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 submitted to the City of Edina by the Church and Developer. This Neighborhood group has worked in good faith with the Developer and Church and unfortunately we have not been able to come up with an acceptable agreement. We ask respectfully for you to reject the plans being presented at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission and July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting, and demand the Church and Developer come up with plans that are more complementary the symmetry and character of the neighborhood; plans that are more in line in size and scope of the other one and two story buildings in this solely residential area. Households presenting their yard signs have done so diligently since March 2010 and they still are displayed, that is over three months. We were asked to be on TV with Channel 5 and there is an attachment that explains that further and it also is copied below. Though not presented below there is a PDF attached capturing Why did we decide on yard signs? We decided on yard signs in an effort to communicate concerns pertaining to the proposed Waters Development. A website (www.edinacountryside.com) and an interactive phone system (952- 929 -1447) were developed. If you go to the About Us page of the website it explains the concerns of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood at the onset. I have copied it below for your reference. I also have copied our current position after meeting in good faith with the Church and Developer below as well. With the use of the website and the phone, these two technologies offered residents the ability to request a lawn sign to spread the word and share their concern and opposition. We also had many volunteers walking door to door to inform Edina Residents to become informed and form your own opinion. Attached for your review per your request are households that requested a lawn sign as a result of being informed and taking their stance. A summary of this data is captured below and replicated in the attached PDF as follows: Two hundred forty five (245) yard signs were distributed. Of those, 184 are referenced in the attache spreadsheet. This equates to approximately 368 residents assuming two or more residents per household. 61 lawn signs were not tracked on the spreadsheet because volunteers didn't collect the household data when going door to door. Based on this data there is between 368 to 490 [(368 +61) *2 ] voting residents with signs on their lawn. Similar information is being gathered of those who signed a petition and will be presented once complete in the coming days. If you have questions please allow us the opportunity to answer them. Thank you for.the time,,and consideration, Kevin McCoy 5809 Jeff Place Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group Countryside Neighborhood Yard Sign Displayers Oppose the Current Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 - May 2010 to the Present. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group appreciates the efforts of Colonial Church and Shelter roject based on the comments that were received from Corporation to make changes to the p residents of Countryside Neighborhood that attended the meetings in April and May of 2010. the time and effort spent in revising the plans to Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front facade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project as was submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development s required under aCity ordinance. t with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood a q Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, -profit enterprise, that Will, benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, dentlforra 195,000 alter quare foot charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale economic activity. The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil alactvit�n the! r neighborhood when neighborhood. No residents believed there would be comm Y they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building i.e.., 139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length.. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The only buildings of similar mass and scope are Valley View Middle School and three times the size ersely of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed.will n dramatically park, land trees and alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. R ather sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day:en Neighborhood Group abe not opposed There is one point we want make very clear: the Countryside N g to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina of the nity.tated youas p has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope J . You have. s cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non - profit senior housing project could be self- sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Residential Countryside .Neighborhood. The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Countryside Neighborhood Yard Sign Displayers Opposed the Plans of Dec 29, 2010 — March 2010 — May 2010 Hundreds of signs declaring, "Save Countryside Neighborhood," have popped up all over Edina. We hope they express the sense of urgency our neighbors and we feel for our neighborhood as well as for all of Edina. We want everyone who loves and appreciates the charm of our neighborhood and city to understand the reasons for our concern and what is at stake for us all. Three of Edina's extraordinary blessings, Bredesen Park and nature preserve, Countryside Park, and the unique landmark of Colonial Church, form the southern boundary of our neighborhood. On February 16, 2010, the Edina City Council gave preliminary approval for Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to build a four -story, 150 -unit apartment facility within this special area. The aerial view above shows how large the intended complex will be. The proposed building is represented by the large red marking. The finer red lines represent the proposed parking. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group neither objects to the church's right to develop its land within current residential zoning and within Edina's comprehensive plan, nor do we object to a senior - living facility. We simply feel the for - profit apartment complex is far too large for a residential neighborhood. Our hope is to convince both the church and developer to reduce the facility to a scale our neighborhood can support, and with a design we can all be proud of. As planned, the apartment building itself will be two football fields in length and nearly 70 -feet high. It will dwarf not only our homes, but all other surrounding structures including the church itself. It will be more than twice the height of the new Edina fire station that it will stand beside, and will overshadow Countryside Park across the street. In addition to the facility, another 75,000 square feet, nearly 2 acres of land, will be used for parking and sidewalks, and more than 300 trees will be cut down. The impact this gigantic project will have on the environment is considerable. The additional traffic it will generate, not only with automobiles of residents, visitors and employees, but in the large number of multi -axle service vehicles necessary to support the facility is also considerable. The short-term, monthly leases suggest a high frequency of moving- trucks. This new heavy traffic will flow around three sides of Countryside Park (and the children and families who play there), which is slated to be extensively upgraded. The park is already bounded by two major arteries, busy Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue. More traffic, more noise, more danger, and more pollution cannot but detract from this special public area. Edina's Comprehensive Plan, adopted to guide the city's future, made clear that while change is inevitable and not to be feared, if properly planned for and managed, change can make. Edina even better for the coming years. The key, as our Edina Comprehensive Plan requires, is to assure that development is first and foremost compatible with the neighborhood. By its very magnitude, we strongly feel this planned apartment complex is far too large for the site and the neighborhood. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group hopes to convince the church, the developer and our City Council to reject this plan in favor of one of appropriate proportions. We have a very short window to appeal to the City of Edina, Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to reconsider the scale of this project. Of broader concern for all of Edina is the possibility of Colonial Church, a non - profit organization, gaining approval from the city to change zoning currently calling for residential use to one that�would allow for an upscale; for - profit, commercial mega- apartment building in a quiet, residential neighborhood — against-the stated wishes of the neighborhood. If allowed in our neighborhood, it can happen anywhere in Edina. Thank you for learning more, and for any help you can provide r whether it be volunteering your time and money to help offset`the costs of protecting our neighborhood (and. Edina), by signing a petition if - you agree with our concerns, by.atta' iding neighborhood meetings to get more information, or for.your willingness to show your support by placing a sign in your yard to,help educate your neighbors.. We hope to meet you at our next Neighborhood Meeting! Please click.on the 'Attend Meetings' button on our Home Page for a full calendar bf events. If you would .like to speak with one of your neighbors; please call our phone number at 952 - 929 -1447 (option 4) and leave a message. Someone will call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood As reported by KSTP Channel 5 Eyewitness News on April 15, 2010 Neighborhood worried about apartment complex Submitted by Robert Moses on Thursday, April 15th, 6:16 pm People who live in Edina's Countryside neighborhood are concerned about a proposed 150 -unit senior housing complex planned for a six -acre tract next to Colonial Church. You need only drive through the neighborhood to see the opposition. "Save Countryside Neighborhood" signs have sprouted up on dozens -- if not hundreds -- of lawns. Members of the neighborhood group aren't opposed to the development. itself. They just want it scaled back. They say a four -story tall building doesn't fit into a neighborhood full of homes that are one or two stories. They'd like to see the size of the complex cut in half. The church, which donated the land on which the building will be built, tells me it will continue to work with neighbors to address their concerns. As I covered this story, I started to see this isn't two a story about two diametrically opposed sides. Each side seems willing to work with the other to hear its concerns. The city council has to sign off on the development before construction starts. I'm told ground could be broken by next spring. Click here for more on the story. Edina residents fight church plans for senior housing Some who live in Edina are opposing a church's plan to build a senior housing complex. Colonial Church wants to build a four -story, 150 unit apartment complex on six acres of land adjacent to the church at Colonial Way and Tracy Avenue. Ted Yoch, a member of the Colonial Church Land Development Task Force, said, "We've been working on this 'for three and a half years. We worked with the city. We've had some studies done. This is the kind of senior housing that Edina needs and wants." The church gave.the land to the Shelter Corporation to build the structure. In return the church will own 30 percent of the complex. The deal would also allow the city to collect property tax revenue, which it does not collect from the church. 5 People who live in the Countryside neighborhood near the church have started to put up lawn signs opposing the project. They say they are not opposed to the project in general, just its scale. Spencer Turner of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group said, "What we are opposed to is the size of it and all the accompanying problems that come with that large size, one of which is the increased burden of traffic on this area." "We're all willing to compromise because of the understanding that there could be a nice addition," said Barbara Hoganson, also of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group. Church officials said they will continue to work with neighbors who are concerned about the complex. Yoch said, "It's going to be a good thing for them and we're working at trying to make some changes that will make it more palatable for them." Yoch would not tell 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS what those changes might be. He said he will meet with neighbors to hear their concerns before presenting a proposal to the city's planning commission. The city council has to give its approval before construction begins. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Kevin McCoy <kmccoy2 @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:12 PM To: Lynette Biunno; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: kmccoy2 @comcast.net Subject: Colonial / Shelter Corp Petition List Attachments: Petition Master.pdf Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague Jackie.:Hoogenakkor. Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen 'Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Hello City Leaders of Edina and Ms. Hoogenakker, We want the City of Edina Leadership to have a listing of 217 Edina Residents (attached as a separate PDF) who have signed a- petition officially marking their opposition to the initial Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation Living Waters Plans, and the current Revised Plans -of May 28, 2010 submitted to the City of Edina by the Church and Developer. For the.. record, there were 30 duplicates on the attachment that were flagged and not counted. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group has worked in good faith with the Developer and Church and unfortunately we have not been able to come up with an acceptable agreement. We ask respectfully for you to reject the plans being presented at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission and July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting, and demand the. Church and Developer come up with plans that are more complementary to the symmetry and character of the neighborhood; plans that are more in line in size and scope of the other one and two story buildings in this solely residential, area. If you have questions please allow us the opportunity to respond and thank you for the time and consideration. Regards, Kevin McCoy 5809 Jeff Place Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group z 4 ! �QD jE@F=OW[EP First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs R Clark and Tina Bain 5812 Amy Dr 920 -1806 thefoodpalette @aol.com 1 Sohiela Mirsharif 5905 Amy Dr 929 0477 1 1 Cassandra & Matt Headrick 5920 Amy Dr 920 -9752 cm uldoon2001 @yahoo.com Kirk & Kris Swenson 5924 Amy Dr 926 -2476 kswenson7 @comcast.net 1 Burton Shacter 5800 Arbour Ave 920 -8324 bbshacter @comcast.net 1 Tony &Sonja Roy 5900 Arbour Ave 926 -1029 1 1 Michael Totzke 5904 Arbour Ave 922 -5500 1 Nancy &Kirk Mathison 5908 Arbour Ave 922 -0733 downdraft @live.com Peter & Mary Matheson 5940 Arbour Ave 933 -5947 petem @sani - blast.com 1 Tony & Michele LeFebvre 6020 Arbour Ave 920 -8847 mtlefebvre @comcast.net 1 Bob & Betty Edwards 6112 Arbour Ave 929 -5676 1 2 Sandy Maloney 6000 Arbour Lane 797 -6049 sgilinterpreter @hotmail.com 1 John &Jeanne St. Pierre 6005 Arbour Lane 929 -0175 jst.pierre @comcast.net 1 Erik & Kari Vanderbilt 6012 Arbour Lane 928-3853 1 Bill & Judith Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane 927 -9421 jbr62 @earthlink.net Grace Kelly 5701 Ayrshire Blvd 920 4208 1 1 Mary McDonald 6216 Belmore Lane 938 -2215 1 Boyd 5212 Benton Ave 612- 554 -1679 bboyd0l @gmail.com Brad Enck 5700 Benton Ave 925 -2386 slamenck @comcast.net 1 Linda 5708 Benton Ave 919 - 601 -4695 yu_xinying @yahoo.com 1 Cindy Yu Balafas 5316 Blake Road 930 -3873 balafasl @gmail.com 1 Dino Waddick 6008 Chapel Drive 996 -9479 katherinejill @hotmail.com 1 Bonnie Joseph Portillo 5412 Countryside Rd 1 1 Judy Petts 5416 Countryside Rd 927 -4384 1 5420 Countryside Rd 922 -1917 lopezgrubb @yahoo.com Nancy &Mario Lopez 5517 Countryside Rd 920 -2416 patrickwiltette @hotmail.com 1 Patrick & Tina Willette 5612 Countryside Rd 925 -4280 mike.a.hagenson @medtronic.com i Mike Hagenson Karl Gensheimer 5616 Countryside Rd 1 Thoresen 5621 Countryside Rd 926 -1231 Thoresen Suzanne 6013 Crescent Dr e@yaho 612 - 850 -6730 Carmen eide @yahoo.com 1 Carmen & Robert Eide 1 Tim & Lauren McNamara 6201 Crescent Dr 926 -6154 1 Bernard Bjerken 6204 Crescent Dr 929-2320 1 Seth Griak 6208 Crescent Dr 1 David Lowe 6213 Crescent Dr 920 -9621 1 Robert Granson 6217 Crescent Dr 926-7527 303 -5047 cov1000 @gmail.com 1 Jenny Covington 6229 Crescent Dr 1 David and Sharon Strand 6236 Crescent Dr 2 Dorothy & Robert Pool 6241 Crescent Dr 929 -5465 829 -5911 rkewitsch @gmail.com 1 Ruth & Wayne Kewitsch 5624 Doron Dr Eastview Dr 920 -4544 tcchristopherson @gmail.com 1 Tyler Christopherson 5833 5224 Forslin Drive 928 -9285 vanmetred @msn.com 1 Doug & Molly Van Metre 1 Theresa Williams 6701 Galway Dr 942 -5775 1 5604 Gate Park Road 651 - 398 -2133 kristin.peterson @ msn.com Kristin Peterson 6904 Gleason Ave milikan_2000 @yahoo.com 1 Manuel Amaya 5505 Grove St 925 9327 Frabonimn @earthlink.net 1 Ron Fraboni 5600 Grove St 926 -6445 sueclasen @comcast.net 2 Sue Clasen Rusted 5616 Grove St 929 -8906 rkrustad @comcast.net 1 Greg &Rose 5716 Hansen 612-532-9943 no email given 1 live on Hanson Morgan 6012 Hansen Rd 928 -0758 gracegrund @comcast.net 1 Jim Grace Hansen Rd 925 -3613 cindy_I_nelson @uhc.com 1 rinriv Nelson 6120 Page 1 of 4 Oirst`Name Last Name,. Street # Street Name Phone Email address ## of Signs Christine Ehrlich 5701 Hawkes Dr 426 -1142 cehrlich70 @gmail.com 1 Susan Chandler 5709 Hawkes Dr 929 -8464 Stcedina @aol.com 1 David & Susan Nelson 5701 Hawkes Terr 922 -1141 sumacandnelsk! @gmail.com 1 Farkhod & Madina Salamov 5708 Hawkes Terr 288 -5531 farkhodbek @yahoo.com 1 Timothy & Marian Olson 6201 Hillside Rd tolson7515 @aol.com 1 Alfreda Terry 6204 Hillside Rd 920 -6927 1 Spencer Turner 6208 Hillside Rd 929 -6216 sturnerl2 @comcast.net 1 Tony Olson 6209 Hillside Rd 240 -1402 adollh @yahoo.com 1 Jeff & Susan Petersen 6213 Hillside Rd 927 -6200 edinalte @yahoo.com 1 Mark Videle 6300 Hillside Rd 612 - 207 -6951 mvidele @comcast.net 1 Mark Evenson 6304 Hillside Rd mevenson @carlsonprint.com 1 David and Jean Wikoff 6305 Hillside Rd 925 -4230 djwikoff @comcast.net 2 Delores Storm 6308 Hillside Rd 1 James Ostlund 6309 Hillside Rd 1 Pam Loffhagen 5801 Jeff PI 927 -4137 1 Jim & Liz Beer 5804 Jeff PI 922 -0164 jbeer5804 @gmail.com 1 David & MaryAnn Meyer 5805 Jeff PI 927 -4904 dfineyer @mindspring.com 1 Tom & Jenny Weber 5808 Jeff PI 925 -4210 1 Kevin & Anne McCoy 5809 Jeff PI 928 -9940 annemccoy @comcast.net 1 Ray & Marsha Giske 5812 Jeff PI 920 -6930 1 Chuck & Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff PI 920 -1931 christine .henninger @genmills.com 1 Steve & Linda Chambers 5820 Jeff PI 929 -3323 1 David White 5821 Jeff PI 1 Doug & Patty Barber 5824 Jeff PI 925 -3181 barberd @divtechusa.com 1 Larry & Dot Kerzner 5828 Jeff PI 928 -9431 dkerzner @comcast.net 1 Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff PI 926 -1763 barbarahoganson @ comcast.net 1 John Harden 5829 Jeff PI 926 -1764 Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff PI 925 -1016 gjjohnson3 @comcast.net 5 Dad! & Penny Setiadi 5841 Jeff PI dadi_S @yahoo.com 1 Catherine Marble 6712 Limerick Lane clm @info9.net 1 Ann & Kendall Compton 5201 Lochloy Drive 925 -1630 anncompton @comcast.net 1 Joe Lambrecht 5324 Maddox Lane 612 - 986 -9691 josephlambrecht @yahoo.com 1 Dennis Seemann 5700 Olinger Blvd 925 -4123 2 Karen Jarvey 5704 Olinger Blvd 922 -7277 1 Jed Jr & Cindy Jenkins 5708 Olinger Blvd 270 -4501 jsjenkins @stthomas.edu 1 Jose and Toby Hanson 5712 Olinger Blvd josehanson @comcast.net 1 Karen Gooch 5800 Olinger Blvd 285 -9088 gogetgooch @hotmail.com 1 Jonathan Rosenberg 5808 Olinger Blvd 1 Mike & Jayne Lonergan 5812 Olinger Blvd 928 -0237 1 Bill & Judy Johnson 5816 Olinger Blvd 922 -6929 bljohnson2008 @comcast.net 1 Stephen & Jessica Berg 5820 Olinger Blvd 922 -0142 NINETWENTY @EARTHLINK.NET 1 Franz & JoAnne Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd 920 -1529 franzsr @aol.com 1 Elizabeth & Eric Jensen 5916 Olinger Blvd 922 -4337 elizabeth.jensen @comcast.net 1 Mark Guettler 5920 Olinger Blvd 926 -0904 mark _guettler @yahoo.com 1 Ying Q! 6101 Olinger Blvd 1 Gary Mackenzie 6105 Olinger Blvd 1 Paul & Anita Axt 6109 Olinger Blvd 925 -1440 pauljaxt @gmail.com 1 Skip & Marta Melin 6111 Olinger Blvd 922 -4964 williammelin @gmail.com 1 Robert & Carolyn IHagen 5720 Olinger Rd 920 -2602 chagen42 @yahoo.com 1 Amanda IKimmet 5725 Olinger Rd 651 - 210 -7480 I glaciergirIS4 @gmail.com 1 Page 2 of 4 First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs David Simons 5725 Olinger Rd Jim Tabor 5829 Olinger Rd tabo0006 @msn.com 1 Dennis & Laurie Eckberg 5902 Olinger Rd cjedennis @comcast.net 1 Jim and Jane Sletten 5906 Olinger Rd 927 -9419 JJDTS @aol.com 1 Brice Martinson 6100 Ridgeway Rd 1 Jennie Johnson 6108 Ridgeway Rd 612- 532 -1307 Jennie @jenniesays.com 1 Paul & Janet Fredrickson 6112 Ridgeway Rd 922 -3450 1 Ms Patrice Sullivan 6120 Ridgeway Rd 836 -0417 smiley0513 @msn.com 1 Karen & Rich Holetz 6100 Sherman Cir 848 -2040 kholetz @comcast.net 2 Peggy & David Dodge 6117 Sherman Cir 920 -4431 pegdodge @comcast.net 1 Molly Urbanski 5800 Stuart Ave 926 -1258 urbys @comcast.net 1 Eileen O'Shaughnessy 4216 Sunnyside Rd 920 -9812 oshau001 @umn.edu 1 Michael Dunn_ 4808 Townes Rd 926 -6898 Mikejodunn @comcast.net 1 Kenneth Kjelland 5600 Tracy Ave 2 Mark Aronson 5601 Tracy Ave 929 -5155 1 Richard Conkey 5605 Tracy Ave 1 Kent and Holly Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave 922 -8596 kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com 1 Jim and Kathy Toth 5621 Tracy Ave 612 - 961 -0444 jtoth3 @gmail.com 1 Michelle & Darrell Hart 5708 Tracy Ave 925 -2184 2 Thomas Widmark 5712 Tracy Ave 920 -3534 1 Andrea Moonen 5715 Tracy Ave 451 -8718 andrea @jadetcm.com 2 Jason & Michelle Kalenborn 5801 Tracy Ave 922 -4947 jkalenborn @comcast.net 1 Rosemary Sundin 5805 Tracy Ave 1 Rochelle Lackner 5821 Tracy Ave 1 Melvin Gregerson 5909 Tracy Ave 1 Leland & Monica Myhre 6000 Tracy Ave 929 -1581 1 Lance Sanders 6009 Tracy Ave 1 Bruce Utne 6013 Tracy Ave 922 -9188 1 Herman Bains 6101 Tracy Ave 929 -9362 hhbains @aol.com 1 Bill Cosgrove 6104 Tracy Ave 1 John Klus 6105 Tracy Ave 1 Harvey & MaryAnn Havir 6108 Tracy Ave 929 -8725 hhavir @nbs- inc.com 1 Phil &Diana Larson 6109 Tracy Ave plmn777 @comcast.net 1 Scott & Carol Haarstad 6113 Tracy Ave 920 9093 scott_haarstad @yahoo.com 1 Alexandre Pimkine 6201 Tracy Ave 1 Jack & Dianne Glaeser 6205 Tracy Ave 929 -0900 1 Elaine Tripp 6209 Tracy Ave 922-7394 1 Delite & Karl Dick 6213 Tracy Ave 929 -1267 2 David and Tami Pries 6613 Tracy Ave 944 -2301 1 ? 5140 Valley View Rd 681 -2674 k2020visionstudios @ yahoo.com 1 Ken Tim O'Shaughnessy 6308 Valley View Rd 612 309 -2489 oshag6325 @yahoo.com 3 Cori O'Shaughnessy 6308 Valley View Rd 484 -5448 corioshaughnessy @gmail.com Bryan & Stephanie Rhody 6319 Valley View Rd rhodys @msn.com 1 Jenn Enriquez 6308 Vernon Ave S 763 - 807 -3650 JennEnriquez @yahoo.com 1 Tara Fossum 5920 View Lane 612 - 735 -1171 tourette97 @aol.com 1 Kristin & Jon Engman 5236 W 56th St 1 Kathleen Dahlheimer 4801 W 60th St Kdahlheimer @comcast.net 1 Tracey and Tom Illies 5200 W 61st St _ 285 -6554 ttillies @aol.com 1 Norbert Domek 5800 W 61st St 929 -8832 1 Marvin Helgeson 5804 W 61st St 1 Page 3 of 4 First Name last Name Street #P Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs Doug & Bridget Baird 5805 W 61st St 926 -6818 bridget.baird @target.com 1 Tyson & Erin Schmidtke 5809 W 61st St ruehleem @hotmail.cm 1 Susan Clark 5812 W 61st St 927 -0959 jhoward612 @comcast.net 1 Chip Howard 5812 W 61st St 927 -0959 Robert Neuman 5816 W 61st St 929 -9359 1 Sally Peterson 5817 W 61st St 1 John Mobarry 5820 W 61st St 929 -3715 1 Jeff Wesselman 5624 W 66th St 303 -5853 jdwess @comcast.net 1 Colby Wilkins 4515 W 70th St 1 Josh Sprague 4720 W 70th St 612- 501 -0252 1 Allene & Roy Burns 5708 Warden Ave 929 -1560 alleneburns @msn.com 1 Joyce & Jim Sutherland 6104 Westridge Blvd 927 -8390 1 Lisa Hawks 6112 Westridge Blvd 1 Paul & Julie Anderson 6121 Westridge Blvd 929 -9687 1 Nydia Carver 6219 Westridge Blvd 426 -0202 nydiacarver @yahoo.com 1 Tim & Annette Kuck 6316 Westwood Court 933 -1441 kuckhouse @comcast.net 1 Peter Brauer 6328 Wilryan Ave 935 -5322 peter —b brauer@hotmail.com 1 Jim Schedin 6041 Wooddale Ave 926 -1126 schedvi @hotmail.com 1 Jim & Elaine Allen 5708 Wycliffe Rd 929 -7382 1 John Hoel 6217 Wyman Ave unlisted johnhoel @mac.com 1 Dennis and Joan Wuebker 6220 Wyman Ave 929 -3729 Twebbies @aol.com 1 Sue IKeator 5041 Yvonne Terrace 1 922 -1824 chickadeedee55 @gmail.com 1 Tracked & Recorded Households (above) 184 Untracked Households 61 Total Lawn Signs Posted 245 1— Of the 184 referenced, some residents requested additional signs to give to other interested residents 2 — Of the 184 referenced, some residents requested 2 signs for their corner lot 3 The 61 untracked resulted from door to door volunteer's not capturing the data 4 -- Assumption of two or more adults occupied each home therefore between 368 to 490 residents are represented Page 4 of 4 Jackie Hoogenakker From: philb <philipjbohrer @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:42 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker, Lynette Biunno Subject: Opposition to the rezoning and development plans for the "Waters" senior center project as submitted on May 28, 2010 Jackie Hoogenakker, My wife and I wish to go on record as being opposed to the final rezoning and development plans for the "Waters" senior center project as submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, we are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals will irrevocably alter the character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot, for - profit apartment complex being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale commercial activity. The resulting commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. We believed and trusted that there would be no commercial activity in our neighborhood when we purchased our home. It is .unfair and unjust to impose such activity on us as we had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. We are adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. We respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the curr^ t rezoning and development plan. Please forward this email to all the City Leaders listed below. JUN - 22-2010 13:02 From:RM,R05ENGREN 9528353424 To:9528260389 Paue :1 "1� Attention: Planning Department From: RM Rosengren (York Condo West - a Neighborhood Resident) Date: June 21, 2010 Subject: Case File 2010.005 - Requesting City of Edina to Eliminate #15: No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants from Resolution No. 2007.63 Thank you for sending the Public Hearing Notice for the meeting on 6/30/10 at which the topic listed above will be discussed. I do not support the proposed change in Resolution No. 2007 -63 that would allow more noise in the neighborhood. Our senses are already bombarded with noise pollution. Whether it has been and continues to be from construction projects (e.g. Centennial Lakes Development, Target Remodel, the Galleria Expansion /Westin Hotel, Apartment Building or Assisted Living Facilities in the area), or their resulting increased traffic noise & congestion, or the seasonal noises heard more prevalently when windows are likely open (e.g. lawn maintenance mowers & blowers, kids yelling & dogs barking, unregulated late night pool parties) or the 24 hr background drown from the freeway. Enough is enough. This area has a high concentration of older people who, In my opinion, would not welcome more noise. Increased noise already has come with the City of Edina having increased the density of the area. Intentionally adding to it is an unwelcomed proposal. In anticipation of your consideration, I thank you. Q�� Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jim Beer <jbeer5804 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 2:27 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Water's Senior Living To: Edina's City Planning Commission and City Council Members From: Elizabeth Beer I just reviewed the proposed compromise by "The Water's ". I do not'feel that 150 units -1 lunits equals a compromise. Mayor Hovland's quote in the Edina Guide is of avision.being created by "all of us" who call it home. This is the Countryside's neighbors home!-The majority of Colonial's members are not even from Edina and drive to their homes after service. If polled, they probably wouldn't want this near theirhomes, have not walked the perimeters of this building, and would not want anything this.large unless it was a for profit for a non profit. This , in my opinion, is about greed, and -flies in the face of "love by neighbor ". I am the-neighbor who feels that this is very disrespectful as. was the process staged by Living Waters and a small church, council. This large building is being considered- to support a Church and my question is- if. Colonial zoning is changed, can all Churches deign to support themselves with. a large, for profit business? Only a few units will support the ill with contracted services, the rest are are high priced transient rental apartments. Should HUD money be used for this building? The picture of 4 or 5 cars and tall trees is a bit deceptive, as was the placing of the zoning sign. If I was proud of my Church's mission statement, I would brag about it, not conceal it. This is about the politics of a church and the tactics of a successful builder of senior citizen facilities. For me, a senior citizen, the quality of my neighborhood is at stake. I believe that no one that is in our zipcode is voting on such an important issue, and that impacts my drive to work, and becomes a devisive Edina issue. An appropriate designation of this land would be respectful, but this is about greed. This neighborhood is multigenerational, so .that word isn't accurate. Please, consider the immensity of this building, submitted by .A mega business with canned tactics coming up against a neighborhood, who has been paying taxes, trying to protect it's cherished way of living. If this complex does not fill up, such as the Grarnmercy. then who is responsible for a huge apartment complex plopped down in a residential area? Will Colonial assume responsibility? We have nursing .home facilities not full, expensive condo's off Hiway #100 not selling, and terrible traffic off #62 when school is in session or Colonial services let out. Have Colonial and our neighborhood compromise on land use that�we would support. Please do not change the zoning and make my neighborhood vunerable to a mega complex that would not even fit around the Southdale area. This is not a win win! Only Colonial and Jay Jensen's Company wins. At an earlier City Council meeting, I was overwhelmed at the proposal and the small bits of siding shown to make it look better. It was a shock. This has been sold to a small church council that is coming off many changes internally. , Don't let my neighborhood and our environment pay the price of their decisions. Please don't change the zoning and have extensive, transient traffic between 2 schools and a park, and please put yourselves in my neighborhood. We love it, so don't change it with a building that is not appropriate for this area. Is there emotion involved, absolutely, but, I truly believe that many on the committees and many members of the congregation know that this is "not" right. At this time it is just on paper, it can be stopped. Thank you, Elizabeth Beer Elizabeth Beer Jackie Hoogenakker From: Brian Barry <BBarry@Haemonetics.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 12:45 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina 1st Addn Dear Planning Department, I am writing you to formally inform you of my dissatisfaction with you and the governing body of Edina. As a resident of Edina I am appalled that you would just arbitrarily rezone the above lot to allow a non - profit organization to financially benefit at the cost of the neighborhood. The residents of Edina do not want this structure built, the only ones that do are you, the city council, mayor and members of Colonial Church; 2 /3rds of who do not even live in Edina. I am beyond irate that you have put the wants and needs of the non - residents of Colony Church ahead of the residence, you should be ashamed. Do not allow this project to proceed. Do not build a six hundred/ 3+ story building on the land and in my neighborhood, build it yours if you want it that bad. You are failing those you are suppose to represent. Brian P. Barry 6100 Westridge Blvd Edina, MN 55436 Mobile: 413- 219 -3358 bpbarry6100(c-)-g mail. corn Jackie Hoo enakker From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:05 AM .: To: 'Steve.Brown @northmarq:corn'? Jarpenter @hensonefron.com'; 'arlenef @aol.com'; jarisser@ stthomas .edu';'mschroeder23 @msn.com' Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Concerns regarding the so- called Waters Senior Living Project This message needs to reach the requested people on the Planning Commission. I.:do not have e-mail addresses-for Michael Fischer, Floyd Grabiel, Nancy Scherer.. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 =8861 www ;cityofedina.com From: RayVoss @aol.com [mailto:RayVoss @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 20108:06 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: barbarahoganson @comcast.net Subject: Concerns regarding the so- called Waters Senior Living Project Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene, Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Re: Concerns regarding the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation's Waters Senior Living Project Dear Edina Planning Commissioners: I have written the following concerns to Mayor Hovland . and the Edina Council Members and via this e-mail, I am expressing these same concerns to you. I hope you will consider them as you review the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation's proposal when it comes up on your meeting agenda. SUMMARY: I am writing to urge you to either reject the proposed so- called Waters Senior Living Project on Colonial Drive in its entirety or postpone indefinitely any decision regarding this project until Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation significantly modify the project to bring it in line with the character of the Countryside Neighborhood. Either return to a development suitable for the original R -1 zoning; or make a small, incremental accommodation in zoning similar in size, style and scope to the townhouses on the other side of Colonial Church. BACKGROUND AND ,RATIONALE: 1 I've lived in the Countryside Neighborhood since 1981 across from Countryside Elementary School and, except for the new fire station, expansion of Good Samaritan Methodist Church and the remodeling of some of the homes, the complexion of the neighborhood has remained unchanged during that time period. During the year plus process of the City's recent recasting of its Comprehensive Plan, I attended some of the community meetings and, at no time did I see a proposal presented which indicated any intent on the part of the City to make such a major change in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for this area. Imagine my surprise when I returned home this spring from a six month RV trip to learn of the massive Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation's plans for the high cost, commercial Waters Senior Living Project. And, to learn that in just 45 days the City had given initial approval to both modifying the Comprehensive Plan and amending the Zoning ordinance from R -1 to drop what I understand is now a four level, 600 ft. long, 44 ft. high, 139 unit commercial, high cost senior housing project right across from one of the two parks in our neighborhood! To be clear, I am NOT against Colonial Church developing its property, nor am I against affordable senior housing, but I've looked at what I understand is the most recent concept plan for this project and it just does not fit the neighborhood. It doesn't meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan to Protect and Preserve the Essential Character of the Existing Residential Neighborhood nor is it a Development Project that Complements the Area and the Neighborhood. There are concept drawings illustrating views which purport to show the building obscured by vegetation, but these are new trees that won't reach the illustrated size for 20 -30 years! In the meantime, most of the existing beautiful trees on the site will be destroyed. The other illustrated views from the north and northwest, including from the park, show this large building will never be obscured by trees! While I don't have any traffic studies, clearly adding 139 units of senior assisted living will add significantly to the traffic in the area with staff coming and going 24/7, residents making their trips and visitors coming to see friends and relatives. Certainly much more traffic than was contemplated by the R -1 zoning! would also suspect that a building of this size will also add a significant burden to the existing infrastructure of sewer and water service as well as electric, telephone and cable utilities to serve the residents. A much smaller project, perhaps on the scale of the condominium units on the other side of Colonial Church would fit in nicely, if the Church and the City decided that the original R -1 zoning was no longer appropriate. Such a development could be one or two story apartments or townhouses and, if they wanted to serve the senior population, could be non- profit senior living apartments or a senior cooperative, perhaps serving 50 -70 seniors. On the other hand, Colonial Church and the Countryside Community members have lived with what has been the existing R -1 zoning for many years with no objections to that status. So what has changed that justifies any change in zoning? There have been no other developments in the area which support a change in zoning. The only "change" evident is that Colonial Church has decided it wants to make as much money off the property now and in the future as it can! Now I can't fault the Church for "trying to make a buck "! But for the same reason that I can't convert my house to a neighborhood store to serve the people coming to Countryside School across the street, Colonial Church shouldn't be allowed to convert its R -1 property to such a large, non - conforming commercial entity! As I understand it, they are not even proposing "affordable" senior housing. The precedents that will be set if this project is approved as proposed pose real problems for the future, not only for the Countryside Neighborhood but for all single family (R -1) neighborhoods in the City: (1) Amending the Comprehensive Plan in such a short period of time without larger notice to and participation by the Neighborhood and the rest of the community (at least I did not receive any notice), after the City spent considerable time and money with the community at -large recasting the Comprehensive Plan is an inappropriate precedent for the handling of future proposals in R -1 areas of the City. Years ago, I served on a small city's planning commission and I've watched many other cities in the Twin Cities and elsewhere administer their Comprehensive Plans, and none would have thought of amending their Plans so quickly without soliciting input from the entire community. (2) Amending the Zoning ordinance from R -1 to allow such a large, commercial venture to be plopped down in an entirely R -1 area is what many call derisively "spot zoning ". It sets a bad precedent that other churches or property owners in R -1 areas may wish to follow to the detriment of the residential areas throughout Edina. (Good Samaritan Methodist Church is but one block away from my home and while I'm comfortable with their „existing building and operations, if this Colonial Church project is approved, they could easily decide someday to purchase the adjoining single family residences and propose a commercial development as well, for example. If this project is approved, so could all the other churches nestled in the R -1 residential areas of the City.) So, as I said at the outset,,please either disapprove this project in its entirety, or defer action until Colonial Church and Shelter Corp. reduce its size and scope to fit the character of the Countryside Neighborhood. I don't think this is an unreasonable request. Sincerely, l Raymond Voss Mailing address: 5021 Vernon Ave. So. #312 Edina, Minnesota 55436 Residence address: 5716 Benton Ave. Edina, Minnesota 55436 952- 927 -0448 rayvoss4- aol.com cc: Barbara Hoganson 3 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jose Hanson <josehanson @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 12:55 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Waters Commercial Scheme D1�s VA Dear Planning Commission Members, I am sorry I cannot attend next week's meeting due to my being out of town. The proposed zoning change for Countryside will do nothing — nothing! —for Edina, and the city is about to be taken for a ride. The developers offer no evidence the city needs anything of this sort. The only reason a convalescent home was selected is because the original plan, a huge apartment complex, required more parking than the site could provide. The church also considered many other options, including an indoor soccer field and a shopping center, before being forced to go with a nursing home. Church and developers now pretend elderly care is sorely needed in Edina and was the church's mission all along. The site wasn't chosen because it was the best location for such a complex, but rather because the church happens to own the land and wants to develop it. In the request for the original zoning change to allow the church be built in the first place, the church promised this land would be left unspoiled as an enduring benefit to the city. Monthly rentals show this is really more like an extended -stay hotel than residential property, and as a huge commercial complex, it is completely out of keeping with a residential neighborhood. The developers refer to this project as Phase 1, yet insist there are no plans for further development. Once this zoning change is given, how will future planning commissions be able to refuse requests for zoning changes for the rest of Colonial's land? It looks to be a foot in the door for sneaking in further commercial development. The city now has nearly 3,000 vacant housing units (condos, townhouses, apartments and houses for rent or sale.) Over 300 houses are on the market in Edina. Along with neighboring suburbs we have over -built in office, warehouse, and retail space which now stands empty, and there is an abundance of unused senior housing. If this project fails to meet its financial promises ❑ which it surely will ❑ what will become of it? In this economy let's not further over-build and risk leaving the city with a white elephant. The church for - profit committee and the developers cannot be trusted. They have repeatedly lied to hide the true nature of this project. In last week's Sun Current a representative continued to repeat claims he knows to be untrue: He said no trees will be cut down, that most church members live in Edina (less than one -third do) that the church has met its budget and has no financial difficulties (Costs again have been cut in order to meet a steadily shrinking budget.) that the project will not offer rent - assistance (Although the proposal does include rent - assistance.) and so forth. These are not people who have acted in good faith or have shown any concern except for their own profit. Z gackie Hoo enakker From: Toby Hanson <tobylhanson @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 1:16, PM To: Jackie,Hoogenakker Subject: Waters Zoning Change City Planning Commission Members, I am sending this to you because I will be away and June 30th meeting. D� n unable to attend the Generally a request for a zoning change is accompanied by a list of benefits the change will bring. Otherwise, if no public good is likely to come of it, there's no reason to fiddle with zoning. This is what makes the plea for a zoning change in Countryside neighborhood so unusual — the developers can point to no real public benefit at all. Claims the monumental complex will provide critically needed facilities for the elderly while making available to young, struggling families the houses vacated by those wealthy seniors, are nonsense. If there was ever a critical shortage of housing for the aged in Edina, that time has long passed. similar facilities in the city are running well below full- occupancy as the trend moves toward "aging in place,, (helping the elderly stay in their own homes and bringing the services they need to them.) As for young families, there are currently 300 houses on the market in Edina, as well as several times that many vacant apartments, townhouses and condos. Opening up more housing will only depress property values and do the city no good. No doubt the complex would pay property taxes, but so would houses built in compliance with current zoning restrictions. Colonial Church and Waters Senior Living argue bigger is better, that its building will pay higher taxes than, say, townhouses. Yet the developer forgets. that if surrounding properties diminish in value because of the project, if there is a greater glut of housing, tax assessments will also decline. This holds true not only for nearby homes. Remember, no neighborhood is an island-, each is a piece of the city; if one area is diminished, in .a ripple effect, so are those around it, and soon those farther away are, until in the end all of Edina loses something. It rules are to be :changed, let's first make sure it's for the-goodot the a o H IE HOW I p Jackie Hooqenakker From: Barbara Hoganson < BarbaraHoganson@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 10:38 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: The Waters - Posting of Addl Two Signs on June 15, 2010, Two Weeks Before Planning Commission, Who Made the Decision, for what purpose, and why now? Thank you very much, Jackie. From: Jackie Hoogenakker [mailto:JHoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 10:36 AM To: Barbara Hoganson Subject: RE: The Waters - Posting of Addl Two Signs on June 15, 2010, Two Weeks Before Planning Commission, Who Made the Decision, for what purpose, and why now? Hi Barbara — Everything I receive will be added to the materials sent to the Planning Commissions. All are kept as part of the public record. If you need anything just call me at 952 - 826 -0465. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto :barbarahoganson @ comcast.net] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 7:33 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: The Waters - Posting of Addl Two Signs on June 15, 2010, Made the Decision, for what purpose, and why now? Importance: High Two Weeks Before Planning Commission, Who Hello Jackie, I was informed that you should receive this information too. Have you received this? When you receive this to you print out the attachments and include them as part of the public record, or how does that work? Thanks, Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto:barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:17 AM To: 'Gordon Hughes'; 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us' Cc: 'Cary Teague' Subject: RE: The Waters - Posting of Addl Two Signs on June 15, 2010, Made the Decision, for what purpose, and why now? Importance: High Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Two Weeks Before Planning Commission, Who Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder This is a follow -up to my email exchange of March 8, 2010 with Gordon Hughes where I requested the posting of two additional signs that appeared to be required by the ordinance. I also made the requests of the Mayor, Council Members, and,four of the Planning Commissioners when you all came to the proposed site in March 2010 I am respectfully requesting the input of the City Leadership to help me understand and to get answer to the following three questions, as well as other questions throughout my email. I have provided the background below for your convenience. 1. Who made the decision to post these additional two signs'at this time? 2. For what purpose? 3. Why now? On June 15, 2010, two weeks before the June 30th Planning Commission Meeting, where Colonial Church and Shelter Corp are to present their final development application of a $44 million project requiring a zoning change from R -1 residential to PRD -5 convalescent nursing care, where the building is zoned for convalescent and being built for an upscale senior massive apartment complex, zoned as PRD -5 because it couldn't qualify as PSR like all the other assisted living senior places in Edina, creating a commercial zoning precedent, bringing in a for profit organization, and requestir a subdivision, and amending the Comprehensive Plan to include an area of change that was never outlined as such, all taking place in a solely residential area. I see 3' /z months later, that the two additional Rezoning and Subdivision signs are now posted, giving resident two weeks to take notice. I see the original sign at the proposed site on Colonial Way is still posted. am sure you would all agree that these are very, very big variances being requested, and it would be more important than ever to give notice to the residents impacted so they could learn more and weigh in. To provide this additional signage two weeks before the final meeting for a project of this size is very confusing and unsettling, especially when it should have been done in January 2010. And there was a chance to make it right 3'/ months ago and the request was denied. And again some 2 months ago, the requests were denied. These are the same two signs that I brought to your attention 3'/2 months ago. At that time I respectfully shared that it appeared that ordinances had been violated and these signs were required at these two additional locations. And since proper notice was not provided, I had pointed out that the decision made by the Council on Feb 16, 2010 to preliminarily approve the Colonial /Shelter application appeared would not be valid, and asked you to check with the City Council to invalidate their decision. Gordon Hughes had sent me a thoughtful, detailed email below with all the notices attached (of which I attached for your reference again) and Gordon indicated that "the City Code specifically provides that deficiencies related to the sign requirement do not invalidate the City's actions. That seems to be the situation in this instance ". Then who made the decision, for what purpose, and why now? again raised the sign issue again to Gordon Hughes on March 22, 2010 per the email trail below after the Mayor, City Council Members, and to the four Planning Commissioners that came out to the proposed site in March to visit with out concerned neighbors. There appeared to be an understanding of the neighbors concerns expressed by this city leadership when we shared the fact that very few people go down Colonial Way, but the major traffic takes place on HW62, Olinger Blvd, and Tracy. And we expressed our concerns about the spirit of the ordinance, as it appears the spirit was not being met. I never received a response back from you, and no additional signs were ever posted as requested No follow -up was provided by any other city leadership to me or anyone else. We requested Colonial Church and Shelter Corp to post the signs again on April 6th and April 8th, 2010 when nearly 200 neighbors attended the meetings with the Church and Developer. The neighbors asked them to be in the spirit of the ordinance and also to be in the spirit of good neighbors, to please post the required signs. We did not hear back from Colonial or Shelter so our attorney, .Dan Rasmus reached out to Colonial Church and Shelter Corp and on April 12, 2010 Gary Anderson indicated they would not be posting any additional signs. The email correspondence on this request is listed below in the. email trails. . would like to know who made the decision to post these two large additional signs,.and why now? As a result of all these communications and positions that have been taken by city leadership, I am sure you can understand how confusing and unsettling this process would appear to residents. Please help me understand, what is it that the City, Church, and Developer trying to accomplish by posting these_ signs at this point? Was'it determined that all three of these signs should have been posted in January 2010 before the January 27, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting where preliminary approval was provided to Colonial Church and Shelter Corp after all? If so, what does that mean as to the decisions that were made at those meetings? Or was it done . as some people have„ asked for legal protection purposes and leverage? Going forward, I have a lot of questions around this and other city processes as it seems they should ,;be clearer and not this difficult. We need to get more involved in more up to date best practices that will deliver better ,outcomes for all stakeholders. I am very concerned about the confusion of the ordinance/ law, the facts, the spirit of the ordinances, the interpretation, and who gets to interpret, the process itself, and intent. It appears that this is notmorking as it should for all. Who really benefits from this process? What process are residents, developers and the city able to rely on. "What does the ordinance really mean? Is this a fair process for all? How can it be changed to be fair to all? How can we make this process more straightforward and transparent to residents and all stakeholders? I thank you all for the hard work you do as I know it must be challenging When trying to keep the rights of all the residents in balance, coupled with keeping development alive and vibrant, and planning for the changing needs of our. community. We have a wonderful city,and there are a lot of very good things. However, through this process, I have observed there are some things that can be better for everyone. Understanding that we must act within the law and. ordinance, but understandably so, there is always a lot of regulatory discretion that is used by our City Leaders because everything is not black and. white and we are human. I hope we can first fix any mistakes that were made under this process as evidence supports, and make it right. Then take these lessons learned forward to change some policies and processes to make changes that will be fairer to all, and far less time consuming! If I can help in any way to assist in making improvements, please let me know what forum or vehicles I should participate in. Thanks you for your prompt response. Sincerely, Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto :barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 7:31 AM To: 'Gordon Hughes' Cc: 'Cary-Teague' Subject: ,RE: The Waters Gordon, We appreciate all that you and the Edina staff does for our city, and we understand the challenges in trying to represent all residents, and on top of that you need to work within 120 days. We always want to work cooperatively with the City, be good residents that provide useful information to not only make the City's jobs easier, but with the hope there will be a better outcome for all. Thanks very much Gordon for taking your time to provide us a detailed response to our request, as we know you.are already very busy. This city ordinances and processes are new to most of us so we need to quickly get up to speed. Thank you for your patience and understanding. I wanted to respectfully pass on that when theMayor was out,to the site with the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group two Saturdays ago we pointed out the sign concerns, stating we want to be a good neighbor, and we asked what the intent and spirit of the notice ordinance was as we were confused. The Mayor indicated he understood what we were saying, and was concerned as well. We don't know the city protocol in these matters but appreciate whatever can be done. If you haven't had a chance to come out to the site, we would like to invite you too to see what we are referring to, and to also give you better understanding of our ideas. Respectfully yours, Barbara From: Gordon Hughes [mailto:GHughes @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 4:06 PM To: barbarahoganson @comcast.net Cc: Cary Teague Subject: The Waters As a follow up to our conversation last Tuesday, I've had a chance to review your concerns about the approval process for The Waters. You noted that the proposed project did not comply with the public notice requirements of the zoning ordinance and, therefore, the preliminary approvals granted by the Planning Commission and the City Council should be rescinded pending new hearings. You specifically referenced the failure to post "Proposed Zoning and Subdivision Signs" at required locations in advance of the City's consideration of the proposal. You also mentioned that the City acted hastily on the project given the holidays etc. First, a word about the consideration process. This type of rezoning is a two step process in Edina. The applicant first submits preliminary plans which are considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Public hearings are a component of this consideration. If the preliminary plans are approved, the applicant then prepares "final development plans" which include detailed drawings concerning the exact location and height of buildings, building materials, landscaping, utilities and so forth. Public hearings are again held at the Commission and Council level prior to their consideration of the final development plans. If they are approved, then, and only then, is the property rezoned. The Waters has completed the preliminary phase of the approval process, but not the final phase. If and when final development plans are submitted, another application is made and another round of hearings is conducted. Until then, the property remains in its current zoning classification. The application also included a request to subdivide the church property so as to provide a lot for The Waters and a lot for the church. As with the rezoning, preliminary approval has been granted - final consideration tracks with final development plan consideration. As to the speed of the City's consideration, we are always under a time crunch as a result of requirements of State law. Under the law, cities are required to act on rezoning applications within 120 days of receiving a complete application. If not acted on, the law prescribes that the application is deemed approved. While 120 days seems generous, it often proves to be very short. After the application is submitted, we must complete our staff review and analysis, the Transportation Commission (meets monthly) must review, a public hearing must be scheduled for the Planning Commission (meets monthly) and a public hearing scheduled for the Council. Sometimes a matter is held over by the commissions or Council which can prove troublesome from the standpoint of the State law mandate. As to the signage requirement, the City Code states: B. Sign. The petitioner for rezoning shall erect, or cause to be erected, at least one sign per street frontage on the land described in the petition. [Emphasis added] The sign or signs shall be of a design approved by the Planner, shall be 36 inches by 60 inches in size, shall have letters at least four inches high using Helvetica medium typeface or other letter style approved by the Planner, shall be constructed of sturdy material, shall be neatly lettered, and shall be easily viewable from, and readable by persons on, the adjoining street. The sign or signs shall contain the following information: "This property proposed for rezoning by: (Name of Petitioner or Applicant) (Telephone of Petitioner or Applicant) For information contact Edina Planning Department: Telephone No. 927 - 8861" The petition shall not be deemed filed and the Commission shall not be required to hold any hearings on the petition until the sign has been erected as required'and for at least ten days preceding the hearing: The sign shall be kept in good. repair and shall be maintained in ,place until a final decision on the petition has been made by the Council, and shall be removed, by the petitioner within five days after the final decision..The failure of any petitioner to comply fully with the provisions of this paragraph relating to the sign shall not prevent the Commission and Council from acting on the petition nor invalidate any rezoning granted by the Council. [Emphasis added] If the signs are,not kept in good repair or removed.as required, then the signs shall be deemed a nuisance and may be abated by the City by proceedings under, M.S. 429,. or any other then applicable provisions of this Code or State Law, and the cost of abatement, icluding administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, may be levied as a special assessment against the property upon which the sign is located. Similar signage requirements are also contained in the Subdivision Ord "inance. In my review of the "petition" (i.e. the rezoning application) and the subdivision application; the applicant describes the "land" as just that portion of the church property that will be occupied by The Waters project. A strict, reading of the City Code would require the posting of the sign only on the street frontages adjoining the "land Therefore, it would seem to me that signs would be required on Colonial Way and, arguably, on the Crosstown Highway. (Although this highway doesn't intuitively.seem to be a "street" in this context, I believe it does meet the zoning ordinance's definition of street.) In the case of The Waters, a,sign was posted only on Colonial Way. A sign arguably should have been posted on the Crosstown Highway and was not. While a sign on Olinger would have been more helpful and informative to the adjoining neighborhood, it does not appear to be required, in my opinion. The obvious question then is, if a sign was required on the Crosstown, can the City rescind its preliminary approval and rehear the matter? After consulting with the City Attorney, I believe the answer is no. The City Code specifically provides that deficiencies related to the sign requirement do not invalidate the City's actions. That seems to be the situation in this instance. As noted above, in retrospect, I believe a sign on Olinger would have been very helpful and informative. I would note though that the signage situation should be viewed in the context of the overall public information process relative to rezonings..According to State law, the only notice required for a rezoning is 1) an ad in the "legals" section of the newspaper and 2) mailed notice to property owners within 350 feet of the property ten days prior to the Council hearing. (Only one hearing is required before'the Council rezones a property per State law.) The City of Edina does the following: Public hearings are held at both the Planning Commission and Council level. With this type of project, a minimum of four hearings are held prior to rezoning (two before each body) Mailed notice is sent to owners within: 1,000 feet. Developers are encouraged to hold a neighborhood meeting in advance of making application. Such a meeting was held in this case and owners within 1,000 were invited to this. Planning Commission and Council hearings are televised on Channel 16 and, "webstreamed" on the City's website. v Descriptions of proposed projects are provided on the City's website prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Planning Commission agendas are e- mailed via "City Extra" to residents who have asked to be included on this list serve. (664 residents are currently signed up for this.) In addition to these routine activities, the Minneapolis Star Tribune featured this proposed project in their February 10, 2010, edition, approximately one week before the Council hearing. This story accurately described the proposal and announced the that a Council hearing would be held on February 16. Attached are copies of the relevant notices, mailing area, articles etc as well as a timeline of activities. While I don't believe the Council is in a position to rescind its prior action, I would like to emphasize that this project is at the halfway point in the approval process. There are more hearings yet to happen and the property is not rezoned until final plans are approved. I would encourage your participation. Gordon L. Hughes City Manager City of Edina 952- 826 -0401 FAX 952- 826 -0390 www.CiiyofEdina.com Request for Colonial to post the signs. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dan Rasmus [mailto:drasmus @rasmuslaw.net] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:32 AM To: Barbara Hoganson Subject: Re: Time to Post the Larger Signs where they should be posted - Request to Church Barbara, I will ask Greg about this when I address the meeting issue. Dan Dan Rasmus Rasmus Law Office, LLC 333 South 7th Street, Suite 3020 Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA 612- 746 -0321 This message is intended solely for the named recipient. The message may also contain confidential, attorney - client protected information. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please permanently delete the message and contact the sender of the message at the phone number indicated above. Barbara Hoganson wrote: > Dan, • Since time is of the essence, how about you get back with Greg Anderson • regarding posting the larger signs, (he said he would check into this)? • Especially now, since we are all trying to work together in good faith, and • do things in the spirit of Good Neighbors, and in the spirit of the • Ordinances. To be fair to the fellow residential neighbors that are • impacted that should know about this new Proposed 150 unit Apartment • Building coming to their neighborhood, It would really help our efforts to • educate more people that are impacted for the purposes that it is attended. • And it is the right thing to do. • Greg Anderson said he would check to see what he could do to get the two • additional two signs erected and posted on: > a. on HW 62 (like to see if at near the middle to east end.so when 6 > people are coming off the ramp they can see it) > b. on Olinger Blvd and Colonial Way > > 2. If they don't want to do it, what if we paid for it? They can give us > the name of the people that did the first sign so we can coordinate getting > the other three signs built and posted. > > 3. If they say no, do we have the right to post signs of this nature > as resident's since it complies with the ordinances and we feel it is not > properly being handled, and we have invested a lot of time, money in yard. > signs and flyers to get the word out so people can weigh in ?, > > > > 4. Also, if we had to erect the signs ourselves, in the spirit of Good > Neighbors, and spirit of the. °ordinances, since this is such a big Apartment > Building, it would be helpful to have 3 signs on HW 62. One on the east end > (near the fire station, one on the west end, and one in the middle, that way > it would visually give people an idea of the length. > Please appeal to Colonial Church to do what is right to be a Good Neighbor. > Thanks, > > > Barbara > > 7 nlinnar Rnulevard e0' 40 0' e0' a T V A Little League Field Prep Field -' Basketball Court (Full) l Tennis Courts (Z) Hockey Rink Childrens Play Area ?� Natural Play Area (using cut from sledding hill) l Park Shelter pi Parking Lot Paved Trail Park Benches 't Adventure Skate Loop ©® September 2008 ©® �� pig.:?! 'yf` -: ;(�, � pr� •�a 't t f .. �1.�• pal L,.� I'. Pit ji � 9. ,.r ,�• .L i , _ ;.' � Opt 1 , ,r , f t , . ,/ + f1 � �:: _.r u• tit. .. z fr ► ,7- � _ �'�►r� tom: ..,ate � � �I .'�� ',•� � �. '• - n-_... ......._ h. .. ..isF'6i4r�ra...'nMxl� pg. .r.�_'_. .tv - ,•:• 1 . ( !/ ' '• .�, 4 r" n Al i, pm lb ir V , t AAOP-7 fi sz Yl it H� 1h t,r t '�ic1' -- d�A-f�: ' a 1�r7 � ' to '� �h�'� 94 �� `'` Y:.t .ht1- Y � ��7 ���-,, i"S e�� 7 � .' r yj-"' i a !.• �' •�,j� �'�a f ®. 9- ® , i r � � 4•e � s'a� � � �'' ? t '� c. � w• a, „�� may;.;. c,•'s�. v. r }3'. ��a,r� �} �r.P� r .'j`t'� ?r''y, , „a, S`. j �,r'„a• I _ w,� �4'r1s= -; i +jr,�� r ! ' r� •'xlij: t`S t � �: " a: •�a.6 � � �;� �r ,w ; t�,�;r's' ,�,` r3tixa I'�r�' rt���i � ` � � ` � f �s l ';' tf ';. �^�" .a c _ `�e: ri z I�Y �� �,.; i ta�3 a' :,� as a ca �,�� ..,. �•" ;�;..`, ... +y aa. �.• r. ,..,•. (�-' � r2 �'*" };� /r,1 4 of f ��. �; '�" •�`: sy . � ' t y'z a . ! -. � 4. •drat -. .'1a• j�3 fm. a (� .�s 1 s ;4. .� tll� }t• • P _�� •� if`" ✓'�(. ,, ,,{;�.s.� � � ..��� � '` ,{ll..•r .a 'a aid. t �i i� ..� .. _ -`.,� ,�\ a "ac��+� -- a,�eq `s:'�-,,.. _- 4 w� rw� �.. �,�,�, f 1 .�.I •' r 1 11i � tq. per, P �_ -_ ,�" '.. + ►'r '� __•. : A/�l iaL I _ r4 _ �, '� - ♦ �l yr, ,�,jr , .� 1 • � r r /!,- . *a' .,.• ar 1> t 'G' ( , ,i 8 .� '�. f •� E,_J• I 'fir., .,} t • I�t 1'� .f, ,+ � �•��) +.r+i� •� r rs'tl.+i,^y�F � � •! y _ _ "- i� �a�'lt(1� �...' ��� � � '! I r,,� ay, �. . � )i r_c` - '`7, +•�.M ^+i' . p +fir., ' !i: ' �a f .; a mk y{j �iMiM�jj y, ' . js '•. ,' t .F . �•f. t�+ ' 3 �� r R' 1 � P, t� R � � 4 . +Mr M. t. , ti � 'i4 __ _ _ _� � , ., �. ;� - -_ , � ._ ,� qi: T N -- +eni�iTr�. .� .. ...� t :ciw, .. ...... m.��v .,..ar.i..�r w._ .. ., _.� M.�. .. .._ iw.....r ,. .._ .. �. - - �1s'.� . +. �." .. � � � �t Lr.ry+. �.. � -a.�_. y. ,w_�:�.�,y.�:e...^(�- waa� -ia.` �... �...�+...,Y.a.+.f. III +�.. .. or...�...- .- ,. y. _ �y, FF.._ 'r. 'T' i.�. � s..��. i ,k y_. ,a M� � ....'aM� S'� .X' .dx - nom{ "J� � wt.. M, - : v ' Y� _ ,yJns �s�s5.y� ,N•. K `PT 'B� ��FiIA; — - w.,.:.a., -. r ' ° ° ## .. c -' 3. t. ;a b X ' fie' .. � ' �i^ ., ..�.: ,r. � � � _. _ ,.�" _ $�� � r 1.� 1 {'D!�l � L Y �Y^� ��M ��", �w,h � f�� y.^x �. . _. � �� ! .. .. x ..'I': `� � � �.»� .�.�ran.r+.� _ _ � ., ., .. ;,- _. r: -. . ,M ,. �.: . . ;, �, �,. ,r,, �,. -: � � -•� _ >. _ .. ,�:�. ,.x il_ , ,° ,, . ., �... �R.. �..; SCIEOWIEP June 9, 2010 To: Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council Members, Edina Planning Commission Members We are writing this letter to share with you our concerns regarding the proposed Living Waters senior housing development. It is our opinion that this project, which as proposed would have a footprint of more'than.two football fields, 190,000 square feet in mass and three stories in size is simply too big to be builtsinwhat is currently a predominantly single - family, residential neighborhood, with the exception of a church and afire station. The Edina Comprehensive Plan clearly requires that new development be consistent and compatible with the symmetry and character of existing neighborhoods. It simply cannot be argued that this proposdd.building meets this requirement. This structure would be bigger than virtually every other building in the area, other than the Edina High School; which services 1849 students and Valley View Middle School, which at 210,000 square feet is only slightly bigger, but services 1,297 students. The proposed structure, at 139 units, would likely service an estimated 150 -175 persons, if completely occupied. The benefit to the community provided by the high school and middle school and the number of students they service make their presence in this residential neighborhood completely compatible and appropriate. We don't think you can make this same argument for the proposed structure, which at 139 units, including 28 memory care units, would likely service a fraction of the people. The trade -off in terms of how this building will change the feeling of our neighborhood by introducing a commercial structure, hugely out of proportion to surrounding buildings, cannot be overstated We are not opposed to Colonial Church's right to develop „their property. However, we too are property owners iii this area, and we believe that we have the right to expect that the City Council protect and maintain the character and integrity of our residential neighborhood. We would accept a development plan that is consistent with R -1, residential zoning, the original zoning of the subject property. We ask you to vote "No” on the proposed Living Waters senior housing development project. The proposed project is not consistent with the symmetry and character of the existing neighborhood, and should not be approved as submitted. Thank you for your consideration.. Sincerely, Chuck and Christine Henninger, 5816 Jeff Place, Edina Larry and Dot Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, Edina Burton Schacter, 5800 Arbour-Avenue, Edina Bill and Judith Rodgers, 6100 Arbour Lane, Edina Kent Gravelle, 5609 Tracey Avenue, Edina Jan Helgeson, 5804 West 61" Street, Edina Ray and Marcia Giske, 5812 Jeff Place, Edina Bridget and Doug Baird, 5805 West 61" Street, Edina Tracey lilies, 5200 West 61s` Street, Edina Chr,.istine Henninger — ::�_ � APOLTS IVIN 554 5816 Jeff PI. � - '" _ 'Edina, MN 55436 -1938 "y�' ,° CA- V�emi w r _•4.� y= ri��i�� Ll�l, �i, l��l�. rl��li. �l�l�����li��i1����1i ,�li.,IL.���1�1��„ ill ZIR Dear Commissioner: I am a seventy four year old senior citizen living in Edina I am also a retired Architect who practiced as a corporate architect for over 24 years. I am currently working with an Edina group of citizens who are opposed to the three.and four.story 600 foot long, 195,000 square foot design_ of the Waters /Colonial Church apartment project. We have worked diligently with the developers of this project. The resultis a reduction of one'story and about seven percent of the units. This building is rnassive and completely out of scale with the character of the two story residential neighborhood and Countryside Park. In addition the zoning category of PRD -5 is for convalescent, nursing and rest homes. This building has only Mo units that fit this category and the remainder is 1, 2, and 3 bedroom senior units. The zoning category should be PSR -3. In fact the current parameters for R 71 zoning should be maintained. It is my understanding that the Commission is supposed to serve the interest of the residents of the city. There are at least a thousand residents within a mile radius of this project and only a potential of adding about 150 in the proposed facility. Please explain to me how any member of the Commission could support this project in deference to the preference of a majority of residents. Burton B. Shacter AIA 5800 Arbour Avenue 612 990 8325 Burton Shacter 5800 Arbour Ave Edina Mn 55436 0.7 .31M 120MIA -P.T47A A'L ma ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 - Jeff Carpenter 6705 Galway Dr Edina Mn 55439 �196D To: Jeff Carpenter, Edina Planning Commission From: Harvey and Mary Havir, 6108 Tracy Ave. Re: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Date: May 7, 2010 P We have resided in Edina at this address since December 1965 and have monitored the development of the fire station, 8redeson Park.,Colonial Church and the town houses: Only once did we have to get involved in legal actionwhen a developer tried to subdivide lots on our south border for his economic "gain. Now, we are again faced with an owner and developer seeking to rezone residential` property strictly for their personal economic benefit The following is an excerpt from a recent letter to the Colonial congregation from the Colonial Land Development Task Force. "The Task Force discussed and considered many uses suggested by ourselves and others outside the church. In addition to senior housing 'commercial uses such as a small shopping center, apartment building, condos, low income boiising, subsidized housing for the disabled, an indoor soccer field, etc. were submitted by third parties interested in our property." We are calling to your attention the fact that they looked for nothing but "commercial uses" in a residential neighborhood. It is our observation that the closest "commercial" operations to the North and South are Vernon Avenue and 70' Street. To the East and West it is Highway 100 and Highway 169. Over and above whatever other rationale is proposed by the developer, the bottom line is "commercial profits" in a residential neighborhood. The Waters is designed to be on a level inconsistent with the economic status of the surrounding community. All of our neighbors say that their retirement plans do not contemplate rents in the range of what is proposed at The Waters. "The Waters Senior Living of Edina is being designed to be the finest senior housing community in Edina with extensive community areas, state of the art wellness focus, larger apartments" "The cost to incorporate the extensive community areas — wellness areas, community rooms, bistro, library ; and other common areas need to be spread over 150 units to be economically feasible." The Task Force and developer claim it is not a big building. The artistic drawing by the developer depict the three stories as being less massive than the fire station. Wow! "The Waters will not be a "big building," but a sizeable attractive building that will be complementary to Colonial Church, and of a size that allows for the residents' desired mix of services to be delivered cost effectively." We are being asked to approve a large Taj Mahal on a relatively small parcel of land. It will be unaffordable to the vast majority of the residents of the Countryside Neighborhood. Size and luxury are necessary so that it will be "economically feasible" for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. The bottom line is that the proposed structure is just too big for this residential community! We do have some additional concerns. The PRD5 zoning definition is a Pandora's Box! The restrictions are so loose that it fits in with the Humpy Dumpty story where "it means what I want it to mean" It currently seems to include a huge commercial luxury structure masquerading as a residence. We find it difficult to envision that the side overlooking the Crosstown Highway will be attractive to seniors at the rents proposed. Marketing projections always paint a rosy picture (just like they did at Canterbury Downs) but what sort of interpretations and/or changes will be requested if this monstrosity becomes a White Elephant and can't make the mortgage payments? We already feel that the parking competition with the proposed upgrading of Countryside Park will be a messy conflict. Younger seniors with more cars than predicted? This has to be a plan for the next 50 years, which is something that is generally overlooked. We feel that a smaller senior care facility with much less emphasis on luxury would be a welcome addition to our neighborhood and to the Colonial Church campus and mission. The Planning Commission should reject the present proposal. We would like to encourage Colonial church to come forward with a more realistic sized senior facility for their campus /mission on this location. That may have to involve a different developer. Jackie Hoo enakker From: Christine Henninger < Christine .Henninger @genmills.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 11:21 AM To• , Jackie Hoogenakker .Subject:. Proposed Living Waters Development Attachments: Document.pdf Hello Jackie, Please find attached copies ofletters to the Editor of the Edina Sun Current; that were published over the last several months regarding the proposed Colonial Church /Shelter Corp. senior housing development. Could you please include these letters in the official city file on this issue? Thank you. Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff Place Edina, MN 1 Letter: Project moving too fast Published: Thursday, March 4, 2010 A major real estate development in the northwest comer of Highway 62 and Tracy Ave is underway without a lot of Edina residents knowing about it Waters Senior Living, a large real estate company with twelve senior living centers in place in Minnesota plus five more in the planning stage, has for the last three years been planning, in conjunction with Colonial Church of Edina, to build a very large senior riving center (apartment building) on 6 acres of land next to the church. This facility is huge -160 units, 600 feet In length and four stories tall. This would be a major change to the atmosphere of a wonderful residential area. The approval process of the City just started in January and is moving too fast; the proposal has already received preliminary approval from the Council. Many residents are away for the winter and only the residents who live within 1000 feet of the site have been notified of the plan. I would like to urge my fellow Edina citizens to become informed and then communicate to the Planning Commission and the City Council your opinion as to whether this facility is "reasonable" for the site. Visit www.ci.edinamn.us/ for more information. The next meeting of the Planning Commission will be in April. Spence Turner Edina Letter: Project too big Published: Thursday, March 25 1` The proposed Waters Senior Living rental apartment complex, ,a joint venture of Colonial Church of Edina and Waters Senior Living, a far = profit corporation, is to be constructed beside the Edina` Fire Station; joo'king down on Countryside Park and- a quiet family homes. The proposed structure is as long as two football neighborhood of single fa fields, 4 -. 5 stories tall' feet`wide and includes 150 month to month rertal apartments plus support,services. This massive structure does not' conform to the following objectives of Edina's long term Comprehensive Plan for growth. Maintain Strong Residential Neighborhoods. e Offer Clear Community Benefits and Acceptable Design ,Elements and Project Intensity. s Protect and Preserve the Essential Character of Existing Residential Neighborhoods. o Encourage Development Projects That Complement the Area and Neighborhood. Much effort has been put into this plan yet many of the objectives are being disregarded by the city. Review the entire Comprehensive Plan, at www.cl.mn.usldepartments/CompPlan.htm The objective of the Countryside Neighborhood is to convince the city, church and developer to reduce the facility, to a scale Countryside 1. Neighborhood can support and to- include a provision that further rezoning for other uses be disallowed. A two -story fifty+ unit building would be..more in line with the Fire Station, Nine Mile Village, Colonial Church, the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center and the Comprehensive Plan. Interested in learning more about the project and supporting your neighbors? Attend neighborhood meetings now, the Planning Committee meetings and City Council meetings in April and May. " William C. Rodgers, Jr. Edina Letter. Site not appropriate for big development Published: Thursday, April 29, 201012:11 PM CDT Gail Berkley's argument ( "Welcome seniors to Edina neighborhood," April 22) that the Save Countryside group does not welcome seniors is absurd. Many, if not most, of the active Save Countryside members are retired and many of the active members have lived in Edina since the 1960s when Tracy Avenue was a dirt road. What we are trying to save the neighborhood from is large -scale commercial development. If the Colonial Church four -story, 150 -unit project goes through as proposed, will other churches in Edina decide to use their empty space to build other large for -profit enterprises? If Edina truly needs that much more senior housing, why don't we turn the soon-to -be- vacant public works site into quality, multi -story senior housing? The land behind Jerry's Foods would be a much more appropriate site than the heart of Edina's single- family housing. Kent Gravelle, Edina Letter: Size, process are concern, not seniors Published: Thursday, May 6, 2090 3:06 PM CDT As a resident of the Edina Countryside neighborhood and one of many seniors, I want to respond to Gail Berkley's letter to the editor ('Welcome seniors to Edina neighborhood," April 22) about what our yard signs mean to our neighborhood. Our group of nearly 300 and growing is asking Colonlal Church, Shelter Corporation and the city of Edina to "Save Countryside Neighborhood" from losing Its residential character by allowing the construction of a very large, for -profit $40 million commercial, high - density assisted living building as proposed. On www edinacountryside.com and in the few public meetings where we have been asked to share our concerns, we clearly stated we do not oppose development of this property or senior housing. What we do object to is a non -profit organization, working with a for -profit company, receiving a zoning change to build a 60- plus -foot -tall, two-football -fields in- length (600 feet), 96- foot -wide high - density apartment building in our residential neighborhood. We have found that most of our neighbors had no idea of the size of this project until they just 45 ck walked the site. Our concern is also about how this proposed project received preliminary approval in the chum, developer and city had been working on it for six months or more without any neighborhood notification or involvement whatsoever. The neighborhood group was given just �0 days notice before the developer filed the application Dec. 29, 2009. We are seeking a reasonably sized project that is complementary in character and symmetry to our residential neighborhood. Burton Shacter, Edina Letter: Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT Its unfortunate that one person's remarks about whether seniors should have granite counters or other amenities are being allowed to obscure some legitimate community concerns over the proposed multi-story building that would dominate quite a bit of space in the quiet Countryside neighborhood. The Countryside neighborhood likes the elderly - lets just be straight about that I think the elderly deserve all the amenities they wish to have. They earned them. We bought our Countryside Road house from the original owners who built it in 1960. They raised their kids in a quiet, safe neighborhood. We honored that and looked forward in doing the same with our family, which we did. Now the older residents have raised their families and sold their houses to other young families who would like to do what their elders did: raise their children in low- traffic, beautiful, family friendly neighborhoods. These younger residents have legitimate concerns about new, tall apartment buildings being built next to parks and quiet neighborhood roads. They're concerned about losing their neighborhood character, which was built by our elderly neighbors, and having to worry about increased traffic in areas where their children ride their bikes and visit their friends. So really, its not about opposing old peoples its about younger people who would like to preserve the great place the older people built. Lets talk about what we value instead of what we can tear down. Donna Callender, Edina Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jenny Covington <cov1000 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010.10:38 AM To: Lynette Biunno; Jackie Hoogenakker. Subject: Countryside - Colonial Church Development Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below -- Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary. Teague Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett , Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members, Commissioners, Mr. Hughes. and Teague: I write to share my concerns over the proposed Colonial Church senior citizen` development. Though I share . my neighbors overall concerns, -I also have a very specific concern about traffic and the safety problems it poses for my child and others on my street. I live at the southwest comer of Crescent and Westridge. We have numerous children who ride their bikes and scooters, people walking dogs, seniors taking walks, etc. in our vicinity. The intersection of Crescent and Westridge is a problematic one because a steep hill makes visability of other cars, pedestrians, etc. an issue. There are no signs or traffic controls of any kind.in this area. Westridge feeds onto Valley View which then continues to Tracy. Crescent curves westward to Hillside and continues to Tracy. I have. noted on many occasions that drivers come through from the north on Westridge very fast and turn onto Crescent rather than Valley View to avoid the Valley View /Tracy intersection back- up. Further, traffic from Valley View also turns onto Westridge and Crescent and traffic from Tracy onto Hillside for the same reason: Apparently, drivers already perceive the current traffic control system at the Tracy/ValleyView /62 intersection to be, inadequate to meet the communities needs. With the additional traffic flow that this development will cause in the Countryside community; I fear that drivers will use my street (Crescent) as a shortcut to avoid the Tracy/Valley View/ 62 interchange more and more often.: This poses a signficant safety risk for children at play and pedestrians. I've seen no impact studies on this issue. Nor, have I seen any concrete traffic control plans which would address these issues. I would imagine that additional specific traffic issues like the one I've explained above exist throughout the neighborhood. i How does the City of Edina plan to manage the safety risks to children and pedestrians posed by the greatly increased traffic flow from and to this development? Jenny A. Covington 6229 Crescent Dr Eidna, MN 55436 Jackie Hooqenakker From: Merlin1954 @aol.com Sent: Monday, June 21, 20108:42 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: City Rules To the city officials listed below, Why does the City Council think it's like the tornado in the Wizard of Oz, whirling a foreign object (a commercial monster) into Munchkinville (residential family homes)? If all bets are off and the rules don't matter, then everyone else in Edina can make their own rules. Well, here's a new rule: Don't vote for any elected city official who tries to circumvent city rules without telling the city. Thank you. Donna Callender Countryside Road Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague D v�O Jackie Hoogenakk er O� Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser z Jackie Hoo enakker From: Georgia Otis <georgia_otis @msn.com> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5:37 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 2010.0001.10a City of Edina Planning Department I object to the rezoning of Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina 1st addn This is a residential area and should kept as such. This is why we are living here. Calling this building a convalescent home is using the word "convalescent" quite loosely. Please be careful before it is too late. Georgia C. Otis 6204 Sandpiper Court 952.929.0917 1 Cary Teague From: Kent Gravelle < kentg ravelle@g ravel lelaw.com> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:32 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Cary Teague Subject: New Colonial Church signs Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council, I have noticed the new Colonial Church / Living Waters signs on Olinger and on Hwy 62. Because they were installed several months after Barbara Hoganson publicly requested them from both the City and the Church and only two weeks before the final planning commission hearing on the subject, it is my concern that the City Council has already decided to approve the project and, with the advice of the City Attorney, installed the signs to minimize any possible future legal arguments. I hope I am entirely wrong and that that is not the case. Sincerely, Kent B. Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 From: Barbara Hoganson <barbarahoganson @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:54 PM To: Gordon Hughes; Lynette.Biunno Cc: Subject: ' Cary Teague More About Edina'Countryside Concerns and How to Best, Present at `Planning Commission June 30 and City Council Meeting of July 20` Attachments: final_11k17_conceptFinal.pdf; Countryside_proof_Final.pdf; 271StreetPark jpg; 264StreetPark2 jpg; 261CityLot jpg; 258ThirdParking jpg; synagogue for sale and a congr'egation,in flux.pdf ' Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Dear City Leadership, am sending this information as I have been involved in the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group since its beginning. So that you have more background about the questions and co_ ncerns, and I am not aware of any other forum to communicate this information, I thought it would be helpful to email it to you. We understand the importance of your 'role to take all stakeholders requests into account in making your decisions; including the City, Neighborhoods as property owners, taxpayers and voters, Colonial. Church the property owner, and Shelter Corp the Developer. We have taken your lead to work in good faith with Shelter to and Colonial Church and have unfortunately not come to an acceptable agreement. I have summarized some.current and background information that] thought would be helpful in your evaluation process. The letter from our attorney on file identifes "the Neighborhood's group official position. In addition, some of us had the opportunity to participate in Planning Commission Meetings and City. Council Meetings this last month. We have some observations, questions, and concerns that I would like to share.` We appreciate that the Planning Commission was welcoming and supportive in the Community Comment section. However, we were struck by the amount of time that was needed by the Planning Commission to vet the parking lot of CVS at,the May 2010 meeting; they spent two hours vetting a parking lot of a 14,000 square foot building (CVS Pharmacy) in' an already commercial area. In the end the decision was deferred to the June 2010 meeting; the developer did not receive his approval. This June 301h Planning Commission Meeting is where the $44 million Colonial Church /Shelter Corp project is slated for that same Agenda. How will this work? The Colonial Church /Shelter Corp building is 20 times that of the CVS building and being on such a massive scale with so many more implications and impacts; including impacts to over 1,000 homes in this neighborhood. There are 300 homes within 1,000 feet that received notices, and over 1,500 homes within a mile radius of the proposed property. The parking lot proposed is nearly 2 acres by itself. It will be very helpful for us to understand the process we must follow now so we can be prepared to be the most effective, as we are defending our greatest treasure, our homes and our neighborhood. We want to follow the rules, play fair, be heard, and not be dismissed. Being able to vet a $44 million in 3 minute increments is a very challenging endeavor, if not impossible, especially when the City and Church and Developer has what really feels to be an unfair advantage of vettinc it months if not years prior. We were dismissed at the City Council Meeting when we tried to ask general questions in June to get some of our questions answered, and understand at this next meeting in July for the City Council Meeting we will be able to ask more questions. But what does that really mean? In all due respect, can't you see that residents are crying out for a forum to be heard, to dialogue, to ask questions? The existing process is just not working. Please tell us understand exactly what we need to do so we come prepared to the Planning Commission Meeting on June 30, 2010, and to the City Council Meeting on July 20th so we will have an equally fair advantage to present our case. We do understand that our attorney can ask for some time. How much time will he be allotted? How much time will the residents be allotted if we are speaking on different topics? How long does this meeting go for as we have residents with kids and jobs that they need to get back to or up for? If there is a question, I have seen on the video that the City Leadership asks for clarification to the Developer and Church, but after their response, the residents can't say anything, even when you know what was said is not accurate, or there is a different point of view that is equally as valid, and should be presented as a contra argument to what was just said. How can this policy or process be changed so that we hear all sides before these important meetings? There are many questions, concerns, and ideas as you will see below. Plus more that have not yet been listed. We have asked for working session so we can lay out all of our questions, concerns, and ideas, and get to the bottom of things, but we were denied the request by the City Leadership. We understand that the City and the Developer and Church have had working sessions all along this process for months, and the biggest stakeholder, the % of billion dollar property owners have not been represented at these working sessions. If residents can't have an open forum to work together at this lowest level of government then this really becomes impossible, and saddens me greatly. I know this challenge is a solvable one if we all figure it out together. Thank you for reviewing this information, and giving direction to the questions. We have a great city and feel very fortunate to be part of it. Some More Information about the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group of some background information th, may be helpful in your Evaluation Process 1. Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is a group of concerned neighbors that have organized to share our concerns around the Proposed Living Waters Project of Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation. We have been meeting at the Edina Fire station from March 1 — through the present. We hired Dan Rasmus as our attorney to represent our interests. 2. 1 know you have heard a lot already but thought it might be helpful if we highlighted some of our concerns. Some of these are included on our website, www.edinacountryside.com. To make it easier for you, I have copied the information below. Additional information has been added plus relevant attachments have been provided. 3. We have distributed 250 Yard signs to people that oppose this proposed Development as is. These neighbors have displayed their signs in their yards since March 2010 and they are still displayed in their Yards today. "Save Countryside Neighborhood ". There is an article below plus letters to the Sun that describes why we think our neighborhood needs to be saved. Please see an example of the sign attached and referred to as Countryside_proof Final.pdf 4. We have an estimated 314 people that have opted into our Google Groups opposed to the Proposed Colonial Church /Shelter Corp Developments as of today. Please see the 314 count below. We typically have one email for each household, so that may put the list closer to 600 if both adults were included. We have not verified if that is the case but we have found that most people in the household have the same opposition to the project. Also, we have close to another 20 some people that don't have emails that are part of our group. Coo, t .Rlt grOUPS i — o EdinaCountryside �- Groups Man6gement tasks Review oendina nessacaes Review pending members Manage members Iii-Ae me All members (314) 1,4anagers f11 a2UalcjMBaniiedf3j Opeii Invitations .I Set delir ery t}pe �! OK 1 set m5mhership type �: OK . 314 5. Welcome to the Save Countryside Neighborhood Website! Save Countryside Neighborhood from what? Well, we tell you below. Hundreds of signs declaring, "Save Countryside Neighborhood," have popped up all over Edina. We hope they express the sense of urgency our neighbors and we feel for our neighborhood as well as for all of Edina. We want everyone who loves and appreciates the charm of our neighborhood and city to understand the reasons for our concern and what is at stake for us all. Three of Edina's extraordinary blessings, Bredesen ar and our neighborhood. preserve, Contryside Park, and the unique landmark of Colonial Church, form the southern boundary On February 16, 2010, the Edina City Council gave preliminary approval for Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to build a four - story, 150 -unit apartment facility within this special area. The aerial view above shows how large the intended complex will be. The proposed building is represented by the large red marking. The finer red lines represent the proposed parking. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group neither objects to the church's right to develop its land within current residential zoning an d within Edina's comprehensive plan, nor do we object to a senior- living facility. mplex is far too large for a residential neighborhood. Our hope is to We simply feel the for - profit apartment co convince both the church and developer to reduce the facility to a scale our neighborhood can support, and with a design we can all be proud of. As planned, the apartment building itself will be two football fields in length and nearly 70 -feet high. It will dwarf not only our homes, but all other surrounding structures including the church itself. It will be more than twice the height of the new Edina fire station that it will stand beside, and will overshadow Countryside Park across the street. In addition to the facility, another 75,000 square feet, nearly 2 acres of land, will be used for parking and sidewalks, and more than 300 trees will be cut down. The impact this gigantic project will have on the environment is considerable. The additional traffic it will generate, not only with automobiles of residents, visitors and employees, but in the large number of multi -axle service vehicles necessary to support the facility is also considerable. The short- term, monthly leases suggest a high frequency of moving - trucks. This new heavy traffic will flow around three sides of Countryside Park (and the children and families who play there), which is slated to be extensively upgraded. The park is already bounded by two major arteries, busy 3 Olinger Boulevard and ,Tracy Avenue. More traffic, more noise, more danger, and more pollution cannot but detract from this special public area. Edina's Comprehensive Plan, adopted to guide the city's future, made clear that while change is inevitable and not to be feared, if properly planned for and managed, change can make Edina even better for the coming years. The key, as our Edina Comprehensive Plan requires, is to assure that development is first and foremost compatible with the neighborhood. By its very magnitude, we strongly feel this planned apartment complex is far too large for the site and the neighborhood. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group hopes to convince the church, the developer and our City Council to reject this plan in favor of one of appropriate proportions. We have a very short window to appeal to the City of Edina, Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to reconsider the scale of this project. Of broader concern for all of Edina is the possibility of Colonial Church, a non -profit organization, gaining approval from the city to change zoning currently calling for residential use to one that would allow for an upscale, for - profit, commercial mega - apartment building in a quiet, residential neighborhood — against the stated wishes of the neighborhood. If allowed in our neighborhood, it can happen anywhere in Edina. Thank you for learning more, and for any help you can provide — whether it be volunteering your time and money to help offset the costs of protecting our neighborhood (and Edina), by signing a petition if you agree with our concerns, by attending neighborhood meetings to get more information, or for your willingness to show your support by placing a sign in your yard to help educate your neighbors. We hope to meet you at our next Neighborhood Meeting! Please click on the `Attend Meetings' button on our Home Page for a full calendar of events. If you would like to speak with one of your neighbors, please call our phone number at 952- 929 -1447 (option 4) and leave a message. Someone will call you back as soon as possibi Sincerely, The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood 6. Other articles and attachment on our website for your review. Showed ura to City Hall Excited and Left Disappointed On June 15, 2010 some twenty -five neighbors attended the Edina City Council Meeting to be able to learn more about the city policies, processes, and ways we can help make our city a better place. We were informed that if we have questions, it is a good idea to attend the City Council Meetings to get answers directly from our leadership. So we did. Some of us attended the Planning Commission meeting a month earlier and we were able to ask our questions openly and with support and understanding from the Planning Commission. We were just going through the same drill but this time at the City Council meeting. We were told in advance by city representatives to make sure we ask general questions about topics that are of interest to us so we can learn more. And not to mention other named groups if they are not represented and their topics will be on the future agenda, so everything is fair. We understood that and agree that the process needs to be fair for all. We left the City Council meeting very confused, disappointed, and concerned that we were only able to get one question raised, and felt dismissed by City Leadership. We spent a lot of time preparing general questions so we could learn. Where do we get our questions answered if we can't ask them during the Community .Comment section of the City Council Meetings? Isn't that the whole point of the Community Comment section? The only question we were able to raise was regarding the process that is followed for changes to the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We were not clear of the process, thus the question. A project name was never mentioned by the speaker, however the Mayor's dismissal mentioned the Living Waters Project and he assumed all our comments applied to that even when we said it is not. We simply wanted to know how things work and to better understand the process in general. We were shocked and embarrassed by the Mayor's response. The only question we could get addressed was around the process of changes to the Edina Comprehensive Plan, and the speaker shared the following verbatim. (You can watch and listen to this exchange on Channel 16, or go to www cityofedina.com, click on City Council, Watch a Meeting, and select the June 15, 2010 Agenda, Video). "I understand the Edina Comprehensive Plan is a vision of what a city wants to be. It is a framework for shaping future growth and change, for protecting what a community values, enhancing what the community wants to improve, and creating what the community feels is lacking. According to Minnesota state law, comprehensive plans must be reviewed and updated at least once every 10 years. The Edina Comprehensive plan was updated in 2008. The City uses the comp plan to respond to development, to guide and share future development, working in conjunction with residents. The planning commission uses the comp plan as the basis for its deliberations and decisions regarding review of development applications. Property owners use it to consider potential future uses and development of property. I would like to understand the process that is followed regarding implementation of the Comp. Plan, and what the accountabilities are to residents when a change is proposed to be made to the comprehensive plan, specifically in the land use plan. It seems to me that property owners, including resident homeowners, should be able to rely upon the land -use plan included in the comprehensive plan. For example, in the updated comprehensive plan, figure 4.4 on page 33 lists "Potential Areas of Change." According to the plan, identifying these potential areas of change is an initial stage in the process of guiding new construction and development when proposed by private property owners. The plan puts Edina residents on notice that development may, potentially, occur in these areas, and perhaps is more likely to occur in these areas than in other areas. I would think that if the planning commission and city council are met with a proposal from a property owner or developer, in an area that is not one identified in the comp plan as a potential area of change, additional scrutiny and input from impacted residents should be a requirement before any such proposals are considered, and that such input from impacted residents should be given more weight than in proposed developments that are located in potential areas of change. Do you agree with this, and if not why? If you do agree with this, what are the steps that can be taken to make this process happen ?" Our speaker will be following up with the City officials we know understand the rules owhat weacan be more effective.understand the protocol of the Community Comment sec on o Why Now? Additional Rezoning & Subdivision Sign NOT Posted 3 1/2 Months Ago When Requested from City, and 2 Months Ago When Requested From Colonial Church Published on 2010/06/17 in News Who decided to post the other sign, and why now, thirty days before the Planning Commission Meeting of June 30, 2010? On June 15, 2010 an additional large sign for Colonial Church and Shelter Corp's Living Water project was posted on Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd giving notice of rezoning and subdivision. The Neighborhood Group requested the City staff to please post another large sign on Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd 3 1/2 months ago to give residents notice so they had the opportunity to weigh in to see how they felt about this proposed project in their neighborhood. The reason we made the request was because we live around here and knew that most people do not drive down Colonial Way, but use Olinger Blvd and Tracy. We were concerned that the sign on Colonial Way would not offer the benefit for which it was intended to do; give as many people notice as possible. of the massiveness of this proposed building, most people that learned more, said "I had no idea this was so big ", and as a result, it is even more important to make sure the impacted neighbors be informed so they can express any concerns they may have. By having signs posted on Colonial Way at the site, Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd, and HW 62 and Tracy we felt more people would have the benefit of seeing the sign and to be in a position to ask more questions. And it appeared that these signs were supposed to be posted back in January 2010 when the original sign was posted on Colonial Way at the proposed site. There are a lot of pieces to this large $44 million project, and major changes are being requested, and it is very important for the neighborhood stakeholders to really understand the magnitude so they can decide how they weigh in; changing zoning to a commercial nature with all the zoning precedents that brings, creating a subdivision, amending the comprehensive plan when it was just approved in 2008 with no indication that this was an area of change, and bringing in a very large up scale senior apartment complex into a solely residential neighborhood and all that entails. The City staff responded to our request saying that other notice was provided through the newspapers and notices to homes, and there was not a need to post any other signs. We received an email from the City staff on March 8, 2010 as to this decision. In March 2010, the City Council and Planning Commission that visited the site were then again asked to please have the additional signs posted to comply with what we thought to be in the spirit of the ordinances so peopl, could be better informed. No additional signs were posted as requested. The Colonial Church leadership was also asked to post the additional signs on April 6, 2010 when we met with them to provide them our concerns, and they said they would think about it but then informed our attorney that they were not going to do any further posting of signs. Then why now? We have asked City leadership why this sign is posted now, two weeks before the Planning Commission Meeting of June'30, 2010 where they will hear the proposed application of Colonial Church and Shelter Corp. We have not yet heard back. We will update you when we learn more. .Colonial Church /Shelter Corp June 30, and July 20, 2010 Meetin s Notification Published on 2010/06/17 in News Please click on the link below to review the Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation's Notice of Meetings where they will present their Final May 28, -2010 Development Application to the City of Edina Planning Commission, on June 30, 20 10, and the City Council Meeting, and July 20, 2010. Please read the position of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's response to the May 28th. Final Plans and the requested next steps. Colonial Church Shelter Co m Notification of Jun 30 Plan CommissionANDJuly 20 City Council Mt9s The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group appreciates the efforts of Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation to make changes to the project based on the comments that were received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood that attended the meetings in April and May of 2010. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front facade with bump -outs; and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project as was submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and, development plans is that they do not fit with -the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City. ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square. foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small- scale economic activity. The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable, expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan ; the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building — i.e.., 139 units, three stories, forty -four feet.high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Country side Neighborhood. The only buildings of similaryinass and scope are Valley View Middle School and three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed. will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy. Avenue and O Olinger r da and Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey y Y parking lot lights by night. There is one point we want make very clear: the Countryside Neighborhood Group .are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed;,for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a'good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non - profit senior housing project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that Colonial Church and Shelter Coroporation enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Residential Countryside Neighborhood. Minnesota Business 2008 Article on Shelter Corporation It mentions 125 units back in 2008. But Shelter and Colonial said it had to be 150, and then with Neighborhood pushback it is reduced slightly to 139. MN Business 2008 Shelter Corp Feature- 125 units Letter to the editor published in Edina Sun Current May 6, 2010 2010 05 06 Countryside continents obscuring legitimate community Letter to the editor published in Edina Sun Current May 6, 2010 05 06 Size, process are concern, not seniors Letter to the editor published in Edina Sun Current April 29, 2010 2010 04 29 Site not appropriate for big development Article published in the Edina Sun Current April 15, 2010 2010 04 15 Countryside Neighborhood fights senior housing proposal Letter to the Editor in Edina Sun Current March 25, 2010 2010 03 25 Project too big Letter to the Editor in Edina Sun Current March 4, 2010 2010 03 04 Project moving too fas t Colonial Church Meeting Announcement, April 6, and April 8, 2010 — 6:30 PM Published on 2010/06/17 Colonial Church/Shelter Corp Meeting Notice for April 6 and April 8, 2010 Note: We are currently, waiting for Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation to respond to.concerris expressed by more than 200 neighbors who attended these meetings. We expect a response meeting by the end of April, Here's More Helpful Information The following documents are provided to assist you further in understanding the issues. Please take a look at the Summary Sheet and FAQ's that were put together by the Countryside Neighbor Group to give you some key points about the Shelter Corporatiori's Proposed Development. Colonial Church Living Waters Project Detail Summary Sheet.doc Good Things are Happening in Countryside! 'The Proposed Colonial Church/Shelter Corp (Living Waters) Project has been a very strong force< o further unite those neighbors of the Countryside Neighborhood Community that are very concerned about the'very large project that has been preliminarily approved by the City Council of Edina, February, 16, 2010.. March 17,20 10 Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board Meeting The concerned Countryside Neighbors filled the room on March 17, 2010 for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's monthly Board Meeting. The Neighborhood Spokesperson communicated the many concerns of the Neighborhood regarding this very large complex being proposed in the Edina Countryside area. The Watershed District indicated they would provide written responses to the questions being raised within the next week. Edina Countryside Upgrades (make sure all is looked at in total and not in a silo From: John Keprios [ mailto:JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:17 PM To: John Harden Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: RE: One neighbor's glance at the Countryside Park plans... John Thank you for your email. I appreciate your comments. The hockey rink is proposed to be placed in the proper north/south orientation because it-becomes the first rink in the City to lose its ice along the south facing boards. The size and type of warming is yet to be determined. The photo of the replacement is misleading. When funding is available, it is my intent to have a neighborhood committee help design a new warn-ii-rig house that fits the needs of the park, neighborhood and character of its surroundings. It may very well be siummilar to the new larger park shelter buildings at Weber and Cornelia School Park. Decomposition of organic matter under the ice is a problem at most of our outdoor skating rinks at the end of each skating season. That is the cause of the foul odor. It is difficult to build outdoor ice in a green manner on soils that don't em' it those gases. 9 Your suggestion to relocate the proposed regional trail is noted and I will share that comment with Tree Rivers Park District. Funding has become a significant issue due to Minnesota State Legislature imposed levy limits and loss of Market Value Homestead Credit. Staff are asked to take voluntary furloughs; salaries are frozen; car allowances eliminated; full -time and part-time positions are being frozen or eliminated and services are being reduced. In other words, the timing of capital improvement plans for the entire park system is difficult to predict at this point due to available funding. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs" From: John Harden [mailto:JHarden @hardeninc.com] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:07 PM To: John Keprios Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: One neighbor's glance at the Countryside Park plans... John, Barbara Hoganson sent these plans to me for "neighbor comment." I have a couple that I would be interests in your reaction... My initial glance is that the the earlier plans have been scaled waaaay down to save money - basically almost everything is placed the same as before except for rotating the hockey rink (which I don't think was even included in the earlier plans) and replacing the warming house with a teenie- weenie new one. I personally feel that this neighborhood has drawn the short straw compared to buildings that went in at Weber Park and Cornelia. Build something we can all be proud off, and it will be used all year. Put in a token building, and be disappointed with the results. If you want to save money, just leave the "sledding hill" where it is to protect the rink from the north winter wind, and it will also block some of the view of whatever ends up going in on the Colonial land. However, this plan will relieve some traffic on the south side compared to an earlier plan that put one baseball diamond there. On the other hand, it will compound traffic problems if the bike trail remains on the north side of the park. This would be another argument to run the trail down Colonial Way with an exit by the Fire Station. I sincerely hope that this plan includes improvement of the soil in the park. The whole park needs about three feet of good soil that allows for drainage, etc. Our kids never skated there in the winter because it smelled like a cow pasture. John 10 From: John Keprios [ mailto:JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, June 14; 2010 3:43 PM To: Barbara Hoganson Subject: RE: Question about Countryside Park Development Barbara: Here is,a copy of the Master Plan. It is not online. If you have any,questions, feel free to contact me. John'Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 %eprios(Dci edina.mn.us ',We Create Community through PeoPle, Parks and Programs" From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto :barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 10:46 AM To: John Keprios Subject: Question about Countryside Park Development Hello John, Thank you again for presenting the Countryside Park Development Plans. Are the Countryside Park Development Plans available on -line for residents to view now? If not, would you be able to describe what the key changes will be made as there is some confusion as to what will be where and we want to make sure we understand the facts? And please specify what will be done along the Colonial Way Road side too. Thanks, Barbara Hoganson e Three River's District Info Bike 'frail, Edina Segment down Olin er Blvd, and This bike trail is being proposed to go down Olinger Blvd and Tracy — How about Colonial Way instead? Here is some more correspondence that could be helpful. All of this needs to be looked at as a total. From: John Keprios [ mailto:JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 4:10 PM To: Barbara Hoganson Cc: Cary Teague; Jack Sullivan Subject: RE: Proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Map through Olinger Blvd and Tracy Avenue Barbara: Here are Three Rivers Park District Planning Manager Kelly Grissman's responses to your questions that I asked her to respond to: 2 - No significant increased vehicular traffic is anticipated. There maybe a be a few cars a day that would park in Bredesen Park to access the trail, but it would not be comparable by any, means to the amount'bf vehicular traffic associated with a youth baseball game. 4 ±The City Council and Park District Boa "rd of Commissioners are responsible for determining whether Route 5F or'a combination of 5, 5D, and 5E is preferred. The,big differences between the two appear to be cost, potential environmental impacts, trail accessibility, and access to the school. The regulatory bodies will prioritize these difference and select the preferred route. 7 - Three Rivers Park District has police officers dedicated to patrolling regiona•I trails. Park District data indicates that regional trails are safe and that no violent crime has been reported on Three Rivers, Park District Regional Trails. The trails are designed as multi -use and safely accommodate walking, biking, in- I ine skating, running, and .other non motorized recreational uses. However, the existing trails through. Bredesen Park separate peddestrian and bicyclist, the proposed route recommends doing the same within r Bredesen Park. ` 8 - Again, regional trails are multi -use and are designed for pedestrian use and safety. Route 5. provides pedestrian access to Bredesen Park, across Hwy 62 (currently I do not believe there are any pedestrian accommodations over Hwy 62 at Tracy), and potentially to the school. 10 - No. Just to,.clarify,. the entire regional trail is expected to generate 500,000 annual visits. No one section is expected to receive this useage because different types of users will use different trail sections and for different;,durations. For example,,,a walker (one visit) may walk for 3 miles (not the whole trail). So if the walker lives in east Edina, they will not reach the west Edina trail sections, but their visit still generates a visits and contributes to the 500,000 visits a year estimate. In addition, more and more trail users are utilizing the trail'throughout the year not just 6 nice months, the estimate takes this into account. John Keprios, Director Edina Park :& Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios @ci.edina.mn,us ,"We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs" From 'Barbara Hoganson ,[mailto :barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 2:39 PM To: 'Cary Teague'; 'Jack Sullivan'; 'jkebrious @ci.edina.mn.us' Cc: 'Dan Rasmus'; 'Kent Gravelle'; 'Christine Henniger' Subject: Proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Map through Olinger Blvd and Tracy Avenue Hello Cary, Jack, and John, Thanks Carey for sending us the Three River's contact info. This was very helpful and has led us to the following information. Please clarify if we missed something. 12 Based upon what we learned from Kelly, this new proposed plan for the bike trail will run along Olinger Blvd and Tracy, and is expected to have 500,000 people using it in a given year. In Minnesota, with the long winters this. usage maybe spread out over 6 months instead of the year. We understand there are two public comments meetings that are to be held June 22 at Southview Middle School, and June 30 at the same place. They will be advertised in the Sun Current. We have some questions if you could please help us out: 1. Will the traffic study for the Water's project need to be redone now with this information? 2. Orwhat kind . of traffic impact would you expect? 3. What do you think of this Bike Trail-option, or would you prefer another one? 4. Do you think it may make more sense going down Colonial Way? 5. Would you expect stoplight's to be installed? 6. And if so, where would you expect them to be installed? 7. Do you have any concerns with pedestrian safety around park usage? 8. Do you think this option is pedestrian friendly? 9. Do you think this is good time to build this with the economy and state deficit and all? 10. Are there dollars already allocated? 11. Do you have any other ideas or thoughts that would be helpful for us to know about? Thanks, Barbara Hoganson From:. Kelly Grissman [ mailto: KGrissman @threeriversparkdistrict.org] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:21 AM Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Please find the attached map and narrative describing Route 5F (Olinger Boulevard /Tracy Avenue). This information as well as the meeting minutes from the last community assessment teat (CAT) meeting in which this route was discussed will be on the website in the next week or so after the CAT members have completed their review the meeting minutes. htt www.threerivers arks.or news construction tannin - for - nine -mile- creek -re ional- trail -in- edina.aspx Kelly Grissman Senior Manager of Planning Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 763 - 694 -7635 (direct) 763 - 557 -5248 (fax) k rissman C)threeriversparkdistrict.or4 Parkin Please take note of the Parking in Colonial Church on. Sunday. We don't know if this is every Sunday. The City would need to study it. Please see the pictures that are attached for your review. Colonial during 9:00 service in April. All the lots 13' but one (the furthest from the church) were full, as was the curb -side parking in front of the chucrch all the way to Olinger Blvd. The farthest lot was 1/4 to 1/3 full. Parking appears that it could be a big problem. I've attached 4 samples. As you can see, the public lot owned by the city full too.lf the Parking lot is developed for Living Waters, where will the people that are parking in the street park? We wouldn't think they should be parking in the streets as no room for emergency vehicles. We would recommend that the city study this parking issue to really determine if it will or will not be an issue. Based upon neighborhood experts at the ground level, there is a concern. Countryside Park once improved will bring more traffic, Three River's Park coming through here, will bring more traffic. Is this really the right place for this massive type of building? Then if the Three Rivers Bike Trail comes down Colonial Way, then what? What about a proof of parking agreement? Synagoque in Flux Article (Or any Church) (please see recent article attached) As an example, what happens if Colonial Church does not make it, what becomes of the Church zoning? What would the Church become? What are our risks as a neighborhood? What rights would Shelter Corp have? Can we get some contractual arrangements in place to protect the neighborhood and city? And of Course there are More Topics — we will keep them coming Since the Planning Commission Meeting is only a couple of weeks away, your prompt response is greatly appreciated! Sincerely yours, Barbara Hoganson, 5829 Jeff Place, Edina, 952 - 926 -1763 14 Jackie Hoo enakker From: Kent Gravelle <kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:08 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW- New Colonial Church signs Dear Jackie, It is my understanding that you are keeping a tally of the communications for and against the Colonial Church project, so I thought I would forward you this email correspondence I`had with Mayor Hovland recently. Basically, I am against the project and I was concerned that the new sign on Hwy 62 indicated-that ying with all ordinances the decision of granting approval the city was making sure that it was comp already made. The mayor assured me that such was not the case. Thanks Kent Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 5436 - -- On Thu, 6/17/10, James Hovland <ihovlan. a �Jrrausehovland.com> wrote: From: James Hovland <ihovland�ausehovland.com> Subject: FW: New Colonial' Church signs To: " kentgrravelle (a�gravellelaw.com" < kent�ravelle(c��ravellelaw.com> Date: Thursday; June 17, 2010, 6:51 PM Kent, I checked with staff and found out that the City had requested the developer consider voluntarily placing signage on Olinger at its cost to supplement the other signage previously placed by the city. I do not know.the timing of the request but I understand from your email and others as well that the signage just went up on Olinger recently. That is about all I know about the origin of this signage. It was clearly not put there at the directive of the Council. I hope this is helpful. James B. Hovland Krause & Hovland, Chtd. 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612- 874 -8550 612 - 874 -9362 (fax) From: Lynette Biunno [ mailto :edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:35 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: New Colonial Church signs Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 www cityofedina.com CE1� 1 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor, Council members, and the Planning Commission members. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: pegdodge @comcast.net [mailto:pegdodge @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Zoning signs To the Hon. Mayor Hoglund, City Council Members and City Planning Committee Members: I saw the re- zoning sign for the Colonial Church property yesterday on my way to golf. I am a member of Colonial Church and was at the church at least twice a week from September of 2009 through April of 2010 and I never saw a re- zoning sign until I became aware of the extent of the proposed project through the "Save Edina Countryside" effort. have lived at 6117 Sherman Circle for 31 years. I have attended Colonial Church for most of that time. I am mystified about the purpose of re- zoning signs. Aren't they to be placed in a manner as to inform the affected tax payers and residents? If not, what is their purpose? If I never saw the re- zoning sign in the back parking lot of the church that I attend, how could anyone in the neighborhood have been duly informed? I will be attending tonight's meeting and hope that this issue might be addressed. I believe that the obscure location of the original sign did not serve it's purpose and now our neighborhood is in jeopardy of becoming a re- zoning precedent that most of Edina would be against. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Peggy Dodge Edina Resident NOTICES: CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, discard any paper copies and delete all electronic files of the message. TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, except as expressly provided to the contrary, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. RECEIVED RA,SMUS LAW OFFICE, LLC JUN 0 7 2010 333 South 7t" Street, Suite 3020 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel (612) 746 -0321 drasmus@rasmuslaw.net Fax (612) 871 -3215 June 1, 2010 Pla Certified Hail Mr. Jay Jensen Shelter Corporation 1600 Hopkins Crossroads Minnetonka, MN' 55305 Mr. Ted Yoch c/o Colonial Church 6200 Colonial Way L?dina, Minnesota 55436 RE: Waters Senior Living at Colonial Church Dear Mr. Jensen. and Mr. Yoch: 'Phis follows the meeting at Colonial Church on May 20, and the submission on May 28 of the Final application for the Waters Senior Living Development at Colonial Church. First, I want to thank you for the hospitality you. extended to the Countryside Neighborhood Group at the meeting on May 20. l know members of the group appreciate the spirit in which you explained the changes to the project following the comments make at Changes to communitY on the April 'rhe group also appreciates you efforts t comments you received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front fagade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the majority of the Countryside residents 1 represent remain dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this liro_ject. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit. enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 1.95,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential. Edina Neighborhood, one that currently does not have any small -scale economic activity The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the Countryside Neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their Jay Jensen/Ted Yoclh better June 1, 2010 Page 2 of 2 neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope mid size of the building — i.e .,139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The proposed building is similar mass and scope to Valley View Middle School and three tinier the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one point I want make very clear: the Countryside residents are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non- profit senior housing project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that you enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Countryside Neighborhood. Thank you for }row- consideration. I look forward to hearing from you, and receiving an invitation for my clients to continue their dialogue with you on these important matters. Sincerely, AS J A E, LLC 4 Dan Rasmus Attorney at Law Cc: I?.dina City Council Members Edina. Planning Commission Members, Susan Howl Subject: FW: Countryside Neighborhood From: Michelle Lohrding [ mailto :m.lohrding @earthlink.net] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:30 PM JUN O y 2010 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Countryside Neighborhood June 8th, 2010 Dear City Council Members — I am writing to you in regards to the proposed housing development in the Countryside neighborhood. As a young family in Edina it saddens us that you do not recognize our neighborhood as a cherished place and that the addition of such a development will not maintain this. I would like to be made aware of other Edina neighborhoods that have single family housing with in proximity to such an enormous complex. I don't believe it exists, so-why experiment now. Considering that the school board is always struggling to get bonds and levy's passed because a very, very large percentage of Edina residents don't have children at home anymore. I wonder why the choice to add more housing for persons without kids is being considered. We all know that the Edina schools have been keeping our housing market afloat in these economic down times. So, let me ask you why not propose that Colonial Church highly consider single family homes that would add to the balance needed to keep our schools alive and the city of Edina on top for its recognition of being the best place to live. Another consideration ... our roads in Edina are already congested and the proposal of this massive development will add substantial traffic to an already heavy used thorough -fair for our cities only high school, 1 elementary, l middle school and interchange of Highway 62. Truly, it seems a decision like this will only make Edina neighborhoods unattractive with the increase of traffic and congestion. Please consider putting the best of our community and neighborhood first and not the gain of a dollar! Regards, Michelle Lohrding i �5 �d\o To: Kevin Staunton, Edina Planning Commission From: Harvey and Mary Havir, 6108 Tracy Ave. Re: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Date: May 7, 2010 We have resided in Edina at this address since December 1965 and have monitored the development of the fire station, Bredeson Park, Colonial Church and the town .houses. Only once did we have to get involved in legal action.when a developer tried to subdivide lots on our south border for his economic gain. Now, we are again faced with an owner and developer seeking to rezone residential property strictly for their personal economic benefit: The following is an excerpt.from a recent letter to the Colonial congregation from the Colonial Land Development Task Force. "The Task Force discussed and considered many uses suggested by ourselves and others outside the church. In addition to senior housing, commercial uses such as a small shopping center, apartment building, condos, low income housing, subsidized housing for the disabled, an indoor soccer field, etc. were submitted by third parties interested in our property." We are calling to your attention the fact that they looked for nothing but "commercial uses" in a residential neighborhood: It is our observation that the closest "commercial'' operations to the North and South are Vernon Avenue and 70`r' Street. To the East and West it is Highway 100 and Highway 169. Over and above whatever other rationale is proposed by the developer, the bottom line is "commercial profits" in a'residential neighborhood. The Waters is designed to be on a level inconsistent with the economic status of the surrounding community. All of our neighbors say that their retirement plans do not contemplate rents in the range of what is proposed at The Waters. "The Waters Senior .Living of Edina is being designed to be the finest senior housing community in Edina with extensive community areas, state of the art wellness focus, larger apartments" "The cost to incorporate the extensive community areas - wellness areas, community . rooms, bistro, library, and other common areas need to be spread over 150 units to be eco n omi cal l y ,feasible ." The Task Force and developer claim it is not a big building. The artistic drawing by the developer depict the three stories as being less massive than the fire station. Wow! "The Waters will not be a "big building," but a sizeable attractive building.that will be complementary to Colonial Church, and of a size that allows for the residents' desired mix of services to be delivered cost effectively. We are being asked to approve. a large Taj Mahal on a relatively small parcel of land. It will be unaffordable to the vast majority of the residents of the Countryside Neighborhood. Size and luxury are necessary so that it will be "economically feasible" for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. The bottom line is that the proposed structure is just too big for this residential community! We do have some additional concerns. The PRD5 zoning definition is a Pandora's Box! The restrictions are so loose that it fits in with the Humpy Dumpty story where "it means what I want it to mean." It currently seems to include a huge commercial luxury structure masquerading as a residence. We find it difficult to envision that the side overlooking the Crosstown Highway will be attractive to seniors at the rents proposed. Marketing projections always paint a rosy picture (just like they did at Canterbury Downs) but what sort of interpretations and/or changes will be requested if this monstrosity becomes a White Elephant and can't make the mortgage payments? We already feel that the parking competition with the proposed upgrading of Countryside Park will be a messy conflict. Younger seniors with more cars than predicted? This has to be a plan for the next 50 years, which is something that is generally overlooked. We feel that a smaller senior care facility with much less emphasis on luxury would be a welcome addition to our neighborhood and to the Colonial Church campus and mission. The Planning Commission should reject the present proposal. We would like to encourage Colonial church to come forward with a more realistic sized senior facility for their campus /mission on this location. That may have to involve a different developer. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Community of Excellence RECEIVED MAY 2 4 2010 From: Jim Beer [mailto:jbeer5804 @gmail : com1 Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 7:05 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Community of Excellence or_Hovland and:City Council Members, I just finished reading your article in the "Edina Guide" on Edina's Ma y commitment to excellence. To quote, "It's not just your family and the house:you live in that creates that sense community in which ort and security. It should also-be a feeling created by both the neighborho d aanrd of nurtured and there is comf you live. Edina has that special sense of place of well being, where lads and families an intangible richness in life ".. units Well, that is all going out the door if the McMar sion housing have to say ay posithe We Colo your article. Two have a huge project under way that will disrupt nearly everythinge the are the ones who are wanting to dictate what thirds of the members of Colonial DO NOT live in Edina, y Y size of apartments we have in our city, disrupt our parks and neighborhoods, stress our city services and lower our property.values. One last quote, "Our constant attention to our public infrastructure has encouraged the development of private infrastructure, which in turn has lead to an enhancement of the sense of quali financial life that t Edina and are willl enjoy in the future ". Colonial is not out to enhance our community, they are n for a way out and will ruin our neighborhood in the process. of this housing I am assuming at this point that you meant what you said in your le�For those of who development, I would have to assume that you are being hypocritically of your article and live here, it is a place we are happy to call home ". elopment based on the size of it and the fact it doesn't belong in a residential Please vote against this dev neighborhood. It doesn't enhance the quality of living in our great city. Jim Beer 5804 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 952 922 0164 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Countryside - May 6, 2010 - Sun Current Letter to Editor Published... Attachments: Edina Countryside - May 6, 2010 - Sun Current Letter to Editor Published Today - "Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns" DECEIVED MAY 0 ?010 From: FranzSr @aol.com [mailto:FranzSr @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 9:58 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Fwd: Edina Countryside - May 6, 2010 - Sun Current Letter to Editor Published... Mayor Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson; As a life long resident of Edina, I am greatly concerned that you folks appear to approve of this Colonial /Shelter project. Hopefully, you will come to your senses and realize that the great majority of Edina residents do not approve of this type of construction. My wife and I urge you to examine this project and the negative effect it would have on our neighborhood and City, and do the right thing. Franz and Joanie Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Living Waters, From: Jim Beer [mai1to:jbeer5804 @gmai1.com] Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 5:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Living Waters, To The Edina City. Council, Please consider instituting the proper zoning for the Colonial Church land. We,'are a lovely. neighborhood, in between two schools, a park and walking paths. The Church, approximately two- thirds of whom are not Edina residents, can find amore appropriate way to support itself. That should not be the purpose of a Church nor the City of Edina. There certainly could be an appropriate building that, gives them money and fits`a mission statement, not a cash cow on the backs of a quiet area. It is simply garrish, and I truly believe everyone knows that who has become informed. The rental and transient populations provide constant movement. This is a neighborhood, not a Senior Citizen " Ritz ", to move in and out on a monthly lease. The process has not been in good faith in that it was three years in the making, before neighbors could become informed It was a calculated and timed presentation during winter, and with no sign visible to neighbors. A smaller version is still a rental property unit that would hardly fit in near Southdale. It would be an eyesore along-4 62. Sell the land, but build condo's that blend, be environmentally aware and crreate an environment that we all could be proud of, and invest our energy into. This is a community and this is a very devisive issue that will not simply fade away. This project is is on paper only. Please be respectful of the Countryside neighborhood. We are already intergenerational. Even a member of the Congregation stated she did not realize the scope of this, mentioned the word greed and stated she would not have voted to sell if this is what was going to transpire. She also mentioned that there were not pictures in the Church that showed the magnitude. Please consider this beautiful comer of Edina. Sincerely, Liz Beer 1 Susan Howl, From: edinacountryside @googlegroups.com on behalf of Barbara Hoganson REED`E [BarbaraHoganson @comcast.net] �Ai Q y LQIQ Sent: Thursday, May 06, 20104:04 PM To: edinacountryside @ googlegroups.com Subject: Edina Countryside - May 6, 2010 - Sun Current Letter to Editor Published Today "Countryside comments'obscuring legitimate community concerns" Thanks to Donna Callender for taking the time to write a letter to the Sun Current Editor today! Donna "captured the feelings so eloquently that have been -expressed:by many of the families with young children in the area. Please check it out the article for yourself, page 6 and 7 of the Sun Current Please email or call the City, Council,to show you support for Donna's letter. I have provided the Ma' yor's'and 'Please email and phone number's following the letter below. P.S. There is another article that got published in the Sun today by Burton Shacter, a retired architect, "Focus not seniors, but size, process', that l will send out shortly too. Thank you! Letter: Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT It's unfortunate that one person's remarks about whether seniors should have granite counters or other amenities are being allowed to obscure some legitimate community concerns over the proposed multi -story building that would dominate quite a bit of space in the quiet Countryside neighborhood. The Countryside neighborhood likes the elderly - let's just be straight about that. I think the elderly deserve all the amenities they wish to have. They earned them. We bought our Countryside Road house from the original owners who built it in 1960. They raised their kids in. a quiet, safe neighborhood. We honored that and looked forward to doing the same with our family, which w.e did. Now the older residents have raised their families and sold their houses to other young families who would like to do, what their elders did: raise their children in low- traffic, .beautiful, family- friendly neighborhoods. These younger residents have legitimate concerns about new, tall apartment, buildings being built next to parks and quiet neighborhood roads. They're concerned about losing their neighborhood character, which was built by our elderly neighbors, and having to worry about increased traffic in areas., where their children ride their bikes and visit their friends. So really, it's not about opposing old people, it's about younger people who would like to preserve the great place the older people built. Let's talk about what we value instead of what we can tear down. Donna Callender, Edina Mayor and City Council Please call or write to us at edinamail(aci.edina.mn.us. Mayor James 612- 874 -8550 Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett 952- 927 -0661 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Countryside and Roads From: Anderson, Reed [mailto:RAnderson @HL.com] RECEIVED Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 736 AM MAY 0 7 1010 To: Lynette Biunno Cc: boylemo @hotmail.com Subject: Countryside and Roads We support Burton Shacter's letter to the Sun and the Save Countryside Neighborhood movement. The size and scale of the proposed high density building is completely out of line with the surrounding neighborhood and I'm surprised, the city so expeditiously promoted the destruction of so much natural space in favor of such a monstrous complex. That area is not the Southdale corridor. Separately, given that the city has unilaterally determined that residents living on lightly traveled roads in Parkwood Knolls unnecessarily need completely new roads (before the infrastructure's useful life is complete), and thus seeks to charge individual residents directly, I am anxious to learn when the city plans to repair /replace significantly more deteriorated and much more traveled roads like Olinger Blvd and Vernon at both the 62 exchange and 100 exchange, to name a few. Both are embarrassingly in disrepair and should be the focus of the city's interest in road improvement. Regards, Reed and Moira Anderson 6237 Knoll Drive P. Reed Anderson Houlihan Lokey 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4950 Minneapolis, MN 55402 P: 612.215.2256 F: 612.338.2938 Please consider the environment before printing. This e -mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not an intended recipient, or an intended recipient's authorized agent, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e -mail message or any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e -mail and delete this e-mail message and any attachments from your computer system. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Colonial Church Countryside Project From: Marta Melin [mailto:martamelin @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:40 PM To: Lynette Biunno RECEIVED Subject: Colonial Church Countryside Project MAY 072010 Dear City Council, As a member of the Countryside neighborhood I would ask that you please read the two letters to the editor in today's Edina Sun - Current Newspaper. One was written by Burton Schacter and the other by Donna Callendar. Both of these letters rationally and eloquently put into words our feelings as residents of this neighborhood. We all know that Edina's population is aging and a senior housing project would be a great addition to our city, but not one that is so large as to change the entire character of our quiet neighborhood. PLEASE look more closely at the impact this will have on the area and join us in our desire to scale the building back to a REASONABLE size. Thank you, Marta and Skip Melin Susan Howl Subject: FW: Countryside From: Lynn Hagedorn [mailto:hagedornia @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 7:02 PM RECEIVED To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Countryside MAY 0 7 1010 Mayor and Councilpeople, Please add my support to the Country side neighbors who eeel that the currently proposed Senior highrise is not in keeping with the flavor of the neighborhood. Lynn g Susan Howl Subject: FW: countryside RECEIVED From: Ruth Kewitsch [mailto:RKewitsch @stdavidscenter.org] MAY 0 7 2010 Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 8:19 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: countryside I fully agree with this letter. Stop ramming projects through without citizen approval. You work for Us. As a resident of the Edina Countryside neighborhood and one of many seniors, I want to respond to Gail Berkley's letter to the editor ( "Welcome seniors to Edina neighborhood," April 22) about what our yard signs mean to our neighborhood. Our group of nearly 300 and growing is asking Colonial Church, Shelter Corporation and the city of Edina to "Save Countryside Neighborhood" from losing its residential character by allowing the construction of a very large, for - profit $40 million commercial, high - density assisted living building as proposed. On www.edinacountryside.com and in the few public meetings where we have been asked to share our concerns, we clearly stated we do not oppose development of this property or senior housing. What we do object to is a non - profit organization, working with a for - profit company, receiving a zoning change to build a 60 -plus- foot -tall, two- football - fields in- length (600 feet), 95- foot -wide high - density apartment building in our residential neighborhood. We have found that most of our neighbors had no idea of the size of this project until they actually walked the site. Our concern is also about how this proposed project received preliminary approval in just 45 days when the church, developer and city had been working on it for six months or more without any neighborhood notification or involvement whatsoever. The neighborhood group was given just 20 days notice before the developer filed the application Dec. 29, 2009. We are seeking a reasonably sized project that is complementary in character and symmetry to our residential neighborhood. Burton Shacter, Edina Ruth Kewitsch Manager of Individual Giving St. David's Center for Child & Family Development Building relationships that nurture the development of every child and family 3395 Plymouth Rd Minnetonka, MN 55305 (952) 548 -8611 -- Direct (952) 939 -9266 — Fax rkewitsch(a- )stdavid scenter. orq www. stdavidscente r. orq This e -mail (inc!u,, ing an_v altacnn; -nls) is in!Fnd;,d fc•! 1h- exclusive use of 1ha :ndividuiil 1n whom ii is addiess(:d TIJ£ inforrncii-•il rGa' i; ;i Y t re nab :r ma r be and2r Sl:i,�T.1 10 le_J Gr Ut!.�:-:; 1i�1� ^,��.ir,i,5 on its USe of d!,i!�.,s•i:�e. I you are !�v1 'I'�? irlE "�CiP•j 'ECip:i:nl, plea ;a nr_4ify'. S£�1Cr1 f,'u n'l <i� of any. rnis1,ak:� . and d.1l; :,. 'Cd, e- ,152 1 and anv £!:.; �'u'�'•, ": '.: 1:7i�1 ?� -�.ii is )'. Any Ui'1aU1h1_Pi: f:d C "_('J t)5...'r£ of this i5 proh A-1. Susan Howl Subject: FW: email for Mayor Hovland and council members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, and Swenson From: K OSTMAN [mailto:k_ostman @msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 8:42 PM RECEIVED To: Lynette Biunno Subject: email for Mayor Hovland and council members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, and Swenson MAY 0 7 2010 Mayor and council members, I wish to express my agreement with two letters in the Sun Current regarding the proposed development by Colonial Church in the Countryside neighborhood. The well written letters by Donna Callender and Burton Shacter express my sentiments as well. I have lived in Edina for most of my 61 years. My dad built the house on Olinger Road that I was raised in and now call my home. My grandmother lived in the house my grandfather built on Olinger Road until she died. Some day my children or grand children my call this their home and raise their children here. I object to changing the zoning from single family homes to allow for a for - profit apartment building. As a senior, an apartment building facing a freeway and not close to shopping, is not an ideal residence. I support the building of apartments and assisted living facilities in the areas already zoned for these buildings. This area is for single family homes. Countryside park provides open space for young and old to play. It should not be in the shadow of a huge building, but remain in the shadows of trees. Please do not approve this rezoning and the building of this for - profit building in this Edina residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Karen Ostman Susan Howl FW: Withdrawal of EAW petition .Subject: RECEIVED MAY 072010 From. Kent Gravelle [ mailto :kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:22 PM y.. e To: Lynett Biunno Subject: Withdrawal of EAW petition Dear Mayor Hovland, - at the Save Countryside group has decided to withdraw our EAW petition from Ijust wanted to let you know th the Minnesota EQB's consideration. Sincerely, Kent Gravelle Letter: Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT It's unfortunate that one person's remarks about whether seniors should have granite counters or other amenities are being allowed to obscure some legitimate community concerns over the proposed multi -story building that would dominate quite a bit of space in the quiet Countryside neighborhood. The Countryside neighborhood likes the elderly - let's just be straight about that. I think the elderly deserve all the amenities they wish to have. They earned them. We bought our Countryside Road house from the original owners who built it in 1960. They raised their kids in a quiet, safe neighborhood. We honored that and looked forward to doing the same with our family, which we did. Now the older residents have raised their families and sold their houses to other young families who would like to do what their elders did: raise their children in low- traffic, beautiful, family - friendly neighborhoods. These younger residents have legitimate concerns about new, tall apartment buildings being built next to parks and quiet neighborhood roads. They're concerned about losing their neighborhood character, which was built by our elderly neighbors, and having to worry about increased traffic in areas where their children ride their bikes and visit their friends. So really, it's not about opposing old people, it's about younger people who would like to preserve the great place the older people built. Let's talk about what we value instead of what we can tear down. Donna Callender, Edina Letter: Size, process are concern, not seniors Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT As a resident of the Edina Countryside neighborhood and one of many seniors, I want to respond to Gail Berkley's letter to the editor ( "Welcome seniors to Edina neighborhood," April 22) about what our yard signs mean to our neighborhood. Our group of nearly 300 and growing is asking Colonial Church, Shelter Corporation and the city of Edina to "Save Countryside Neighborhood" from losing its residential character by allowing the construction of a very large, for - profit $40 million commercial, high - density assisted living building as proposed. On www.edinacountryside.com and in the few public meetings where we have,been asked to share our concerns, we clearly stated we do not oppose development of this property or senior housing. What we do object to is a non - profit organization, working with a for - profit company, receiving a zoning change to build a 60 -plus- foot -tall, two - football- fields in- length (600 feet), 95- foot -wide high - density apartment building in our residential neighborhood. We have found that most of our neighbors had no idea of the size of this project until they actually walked the site. Our concern is also about how this proposed project received preliminary approval in.just 45 days when the church, developer and city had been working on it for six months or more without any neighborhood notification or involvement whatsoever. The neighborhood group was given just 20 days notice before the developer filed the application Dec. 29, 2009. We are seeking a reasonably sized project that is complementary in character and symmetry to our residential neighborhood. Burton Shacter, Susan Howl FW: Edina Countryside - May 6, 2010 - Sun Current Letter-to Editor Published Today - Subject: "Country side comments obscuring legitimate community concerns" RECEIVED From: mikejodunn @comcast.net [mailto:mikejodunn @ comcast.net] MAY O 7 2010 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 7:21 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Re: Edina Countryside May 6, 2010 -Sun Current Letter to Editor Published Today - "Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns To all members of City Council and Mayor. I'm in complete .agreement with Donna's letter. It is time people of Edina, not their self- hidden interests. for the Council members to represent the The process by which you used was not .honest and a disgrace to the City of Edina !! - -- Original Message - - - -- From: "Barbara Hoganson" <BarbaraHoganson @comcast.net> To: edinacountryside @googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2010 4:03:55 PM GMT - 06:00 US /Canada Central Subject: Edina Countryside - May 6, 2010 - Sun Current Letter to Editor Published Today - "Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns" Thanks.to Donna Callender for taking the time to write a letter to the Sun Current Editor today! Donna captured the feelings so eloquently that have been expressed by many of the families with young children in the. area. Please check it out the article for yourself, page 6 and 7 of the Sun Current. Please email or call the City Council to show you support for Donna's letter. I have provided the Mayor's and City Council's email and phone number's following the letter below. P.S. There is another article that got published in the Sun today by Burton Shacter, a retired architect, "Focus not seniors, but size, process ", that I will send out shortly too. Thank you! Letter: Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT It's unfortunate that one person's remarks about whether seniors should have granite counters or other amenities are being allowed to obscure some legitimate community concerns over the proposed multi -story building that would dominate quite a bit of space in the quiet Countryside neighborhood. The Countryside neighborhood likes the elderly - let's just be straight about that. I think the elderly deserve all the amenities they wish to have. They earned them. We bought our Countryside Road house from the original owners who built it in 1960. They raised their kids in a quiet, safe neighborhood. We honored that and looked forward to doing the same with our family, which we did. Now the older residents have raised their families and sold their houses to other young families who would like to do what their elders did: raise their children in low- traffic, beautiful, family - friendly neighborhoods. These younger residents have legitimate concerns about new, tall apartment buildings being built next to parks and quiet neighborhood roads. They're concerned about losing their neighborhood character, which was built by our elderly neighbors, and having to worry about increased traffic in areas where their children ride their bikes and visit their friends. So really, it's not about opposing old people, it's about younger people who would like to preserve the great place the older people built. Let's talk about what we value instead of what we can tear down. Donna Callender, Edina Mayor and City Council Please call or write to us at Mayor James Hovland 612 - 874 -8550 Council Member Joni Bennett 952 - 927 -0661 Council Member Mary Brindle 952 - 941 -7746 Council Member Scot Housh 763- 302 -7174 Council Member Ann Swenson 952 - 927 -7524 Susan Howl ubject: FW: Disservice to the Community From: Brian Barry [mailto:BBarry@Haemonetics:com] RECEIVED Sent: Friday, May. 07, 2010 7:26 AM To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us. MAY .0, T 1010 . Subject: Disservice to the Community Dear J. Hovland, J. Bennett, M. Brindle, S. Housh, and A. Swenson, have been recently published in opposition of the Pasted below are the articles that approved Colonial Church Apartment complex; I call it that because 1. love the fact that a non - profit church is now for profit. Colonial Church and its campus is beautiful, and its presence in our neighborhood has always been accepted an supported and I think that the facility adds to our neighborhoods charm. The proposed monstrosity YOU have APPROVE, rumor has it you did not EVEN realize how big the building was going to be until you physically visited the site, YOU do is proposed to be 250,000 sq ft, ,2 acres for parking, and 300 destroyed trees sandwiched on the postage stamp of land that WAS zoned R1 until YOU changed the zoning is criminal. g I am dis usted in your leadership, or should I say lack of leadership. if you are so hell bent on allowing this in our town by all means have them build It in your neighborhood, I think Braemar or Wooddale Park insight of your front door would be a great choice. Do you realize as of this week there are 1070+ rental properties available within the city limits of Edina. The traffic levels on Tracey Ave are already. high, couple that with the fact that the street is falling apart, the fact that the HWY 62 and Tracey Interchange during t he hours of 4 — 6 PM is a debacle with the additional traffic iVo._u are now, interjecting into our neighborhood takes a bad situation and makes it even worse -feel free to do conduct a traffic study, one that is not financed by the builders to validate the above. You are not serving the community. YOU are not representing the people that vote. 2 /3rds of the parish that attend Colonial Church live outside of Edina and YET they will profit from your ignorance and lack.of due diligence, nice job, you allshould,be proud p ,. of how you have not served the community. Brian Barry Edina Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support Sun Current Letter to Editor Published May 06 - "Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns" RECEIVED MAY 0 7 7010 From: yu xinying [mailto:yu_xinying @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 9:49 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Support Sun Current Letter to Editor Published May 06 - "Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns" Dear City Offiers: I am writting to support Donne Callender's letter "Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns" published as Sun Current Letter to Editor on May 06. Donna speaks the feeling of many young families including us. We brought our countryside house (built in 1963) less in a year. We cherish the quiet, safe, beatiful neighborhood that elders have been built through out the past several decades. We hope every one in the neighborhood and in the city can do something to keep countryside's neighborhood character. Thank you for your concerns Cindy Yu Countryside Residents Letter: Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT It's unfortunate that one person's remarks about whether seniors should have granite counters or other amenities are being allowed to obscure some legitimate community concerns over the proposed multi -story building that would dominate quite a bit of space in the quiet Countryside neighborhood. The Countryside neighborhood likes the elderly - lets just be straight about that. I think the elderly deserve all the amenities they wish to have. They earned them. We bought our Countryside Road house from the original owners who built it in 1960. They raised their kids in a quiet, safe neighborhood. We honored that and looked forward to doing the same with our family, which we did. Now the older residents have raised their families and sold their houses to other young families who would like to do what their elders did: raise their children in low- traffic, beautiful, family - friendly neighborhoods. These younger residents have legitimate concerns about new, tall apartment buildings being built next to parks and quiet neighborhood roads. They're concerned about losing their neighborhood character, which was built by our elderly neighbors, and having to worry about increased traffic in areas where their children ride their bikes and visit their friends. So really, it's not about opposing old people, it's about younger people who would like to preserve the great place the older people built. Let's talk about what we value instead of what we can tear down. Donna Callender, Edina Susan Howl RECEIVED Subject: Vote no on re- zoning for Living Waters APR 16 TOGO Good Day Edina City Council: I attended the. meeting at Colonial church about the joint venture with She Corporation. This project appears to be moving full speed ahead- -with a great many questions unanswered. I ask you NOT to grant the requested change in re- zoning until all questions are answered. e.g Why MUST this. project be so large? While the.City. Council did'' grant a preliminary change, I feel that decision was rushed and -not fully informed. Colonial church is simply not being :a good neighbor. The informative sign for the re= zoning is not•in an area which the affected citizens can see it. Most neighbors are not even aware of this massive project. Secrecy, does not a good neighbor make! The Edina City Council should re -think its role in this unusual project. The project is simply too large to fit the space and more importantly does NOT fit into a residential neighborhood. While a smaller version would allow Colonial church to complete it's mission of service, it would also allow the church to respect the neighborhood. This partnership also raises some serious concerns about a "for profit corporation" and non profit, tax exempt organization- -one which I believe the City of Edna has not fully explored. We heard at the meeting last evening that Tax increment financing may be "part of the deal." This is raises a huge red flag for the role of the Edina City government. The Edina City Council should re -think it role in this unusual project. Do not grant the re- zoning request until questions about this project are answered. I would appreciate a phone call or email indicating your thoughts about this project. Sally Mays 5529 Countryside Road Edina, MN 55436 -2503 952 920 6012 i Susan Howl Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members and all City Manager, Directors and Planning Dept: As a citizen of the Countryside community for 7 years, I am opposed of this structure being built at this location. I am EXTREMELY worried about Shelter Corp's past history of building Section 8 / "affordable" RECEI\JED housing, as stated in their website. 2�1Q http://www.sheiterco[p.com/propg[tgs.aspx." ,4FR "Shelter Corporation has developed or acquired a portfolio of over 15,000 units of affordable and senior apartments. An industry leader in real estate development and acquisition, Shelter delivers value to investors and communities" Shelter Corp. also stated that they have a Senior Vice President, a Mr. Garrett Carlson, Jr. He has extensive knowledge in attaining funding for the development of Section 8 Housing and construction as stated below from their website ... Why would they need this expertise if Section 8 housing is not part of their plans? "Mr. Carlson's responsibilities extend to financing and budgeting. Through his extensive knowledge of the practices and principles of. conventional and governmental loan programs, Section 8, Tax Credit and construction and permanent mortgage loans,, Mr.. Carlson# secures competitive financing via tax- exempt revenue bonds, commercial banks, state housing rinance agencies or institutional joint ventures." I have a friend that has worked in multi -unit dwelling management for over 20years, and has experience with low income /Section 8 housing and the problems associated with it. He is familiar with Shelter Corp. He asked me if they mentioned a "Phased Approach" in their plan, if so, WATCH OUT! Their primary motive is to build /develop Section 8 dwellings under a covert approach calling it "Phases "....meaning phase one would be an assisted living or senior complex to get entry into the community and all zoning completed and then post phases would be the development of Section 8 apartment.units ... This is their "sheep in wolves clothing" tactic. He told me that Section 8 Phats Section 8 incrin decreased crime, oP creased property values, overall degradation of a community. Nowhere properties improved a community. Why am I concerned? I am concerned about the value of our community and the safety of our children, especially with Countryside Park, Bredesen Park being so close by to hide potential illegal activity... Questions for you: 1. How are we as Countryside Citizens, beh6fitting from the Living Waters Complex? 2. Will our taxes be less due to this complex.subsidizing our portion? 3. Is Section 8 and /or low- income government subsidized housing being considered for development in the Countryside neighborhood, if so, what is the benefit to Countryside and Edina? 4. What are your reasons for approving this proposal both present plans and future? Sincerely, MVidele mvidele(d)comcast.net Page 1 of 2 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:57 PM To: Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Living Waters ... I Oppose! This message is being forwarded to the Mayor, Council members, Gordon Hughes and Cary Teague. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: MVIDELE [mailto:mvidele @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Living Waters ... I Oppose! Please forward to the Edina Mayor, Council Members, City Manager, City Director, City Planning Dept. Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members and all City Manager, Directors and Planning Dept: As a citizen of the Countryside community for 7 years, I am opposed of this structure being built at this location. I am EXTREMELY worried about Shelter Corp's past history of building Section 8 / "affordable" housing, as stated in their website. http:// www. sheitercorp .com /properties.aspx." "Shelter Corporation has developed or acquired a portfolio of over 15,000 units of affordable and senior apartments. An industry leader in real estate development and acquisition, Shelter delivers value to investors and communities" Shelter Corp. also stated that they have a Senior Vice President, a Mr. Garrett Carlson, Jr. He has extensive, knowledge in attaining funding for the development of Section 8 Housing and construction as stated below from their website ... Why would they need this expertise if Section 8 housing is not part of their plans? "Mr. Carlson's responsibilities extend to financing and budgeting. Through his extensive knowledge of the practices and principles of conventional and governmental loan programs, Section 8, Tax Credit and construction and permanent mortgage loans, Mr. Carlson secures Page 2 of 2 competitive financing via tax- exempt revenue bonds, commercial banks, state housing finance agencies or institutional joint ventures." I have a friend that has worked in multi -unit dwelling management for over 20years, and has experience with low income /Section 8 housing and the problems associated with it. He is familiar with Shelter Corp. He asked me if they mentioned a "Phased Approach" in their plan, if so, WATCH OUT! Their primary motive is to build /develop Section 8 dwellings under a covert approach calling it "Phases"... meaning phase one would be an assisted living or senior complex to get entry into the community and all zoning completed and then post phases would be the development of Section 8 apartment units ... This is their "sheep in wolves clothing" tactic. He told me that Section 8 properties breed an increase in crime, lower property values and increase overall degradation of a community. Nowhere has Section 8 properties decreased crime, increased property values, and improved a community. Why am I concerned? I am concerned about the value of our community and the safety of our children, especially with Countryside Park, Bredesen Park being so close by to hide potential illegal activity... Questions for you: 1. How are we as Countryside Citizens benefitting from the Living Waters Complex? 2. Will our taxes be less due to this complex subsidizing our portion? 3. Is Section 8 and /or low- income government subsidized housing being considered for development in the Countryside neighborhood, if so, what is the benefit to Countryside and Edina? 4. What are your reasons for approving this proposal both present plans and future? Sincerely, MVidele Susan Howl rom: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:00 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: The Proposed Countryside senior housing project RECEIVED MAR 1 7010 Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: From Jeff [mailto:edinaite@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:37 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: The - Proposed Countryside senior housing project Dear City Council Members, I think the parking issue is something that would present a MAJOR problem if the proposed Senior Housing . pro ect were to be roved. The are p ro�'osin to eliminate a large section of Colonial Church's parking j PP Y p P 9 9 P 9 and build a monsterous facility that will require a substantial amount of additional parking. Besides that, the park will also be requiring additional parking spaces after it is updated. The bottom line is that their proposal. involves a dramatic shrinkage of available parking at a time in which there will be a great increase in the need for additional parking space. That is complete insanity!! It would lead to a very chaotic and disruptive situation. We would have cars and trucks ..parking in the street and in front of peoples houses -- just a terrible mess. People would be complaining, screaming and swearing -- a very ugly scene and a total nightmare. This is something that could happen on a regular basis -- especially in the summertime. To me, it's a situation that makes the senior housing proposal totally unworkable and idiotic. A very 'concerned Countryside area resident, Jeff Petersen 1 Susan Howl Subject: Opposed to new senior complex in Countryside neighborhood RECEIVED Good evening - MAR 1 u 2010 I am a resident of the Edina Countryside neighborhood and would like to express my opposition to the building of a large senior complex near the Colonial Church in Edina. This area already has a large senior development and the addition of hundreds of additional residents would change the livability of the neighborhood. The exit off of 62 Westbound to Tracy northbound is very troublesome already, and adding many drivers to this intersection would cause substantial traffic flow problems. I am concerned that this major development was not brought to the neighborhood's attention early on in the process. Regards, Tom Kluis Edina, MN 612 - 730 -4558 Marian and Tim Olson 6201'Hillside Road Edina, MN '55436 -2539 (952) 935 -7148 Mayor'James Hovland Edina City Hall . 4801 W. 50ei Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Colonial Church of Edina Waters Senior Living of Edina Subdivision RECEIVED MAR 19 2010 17 March, 2010 Dear- Mr. Hovland, My.family moved to the Countryside Area in 2002 when we were flooded out of Oaks in western lEdinae^During this Edina. Before we found the Countryside Area, we spent nine months at ply once again within Hopkins. Having to upheaval, we also had to relocate our business, Suburban Feed and Supply relocate. so often within such a short period of time is truly challenging, e� g'ing, but finding a most. wonderful home sense of belonging when one finally finds a home. 2002 w in Countryside neighborhood gave us a peace, stability and confidence that. we had not had for such a long time. We cherish it greatly. We have lived at 6201 Hillside Road since 2002. We have raised Labrador. our son played baseball the Ed Edina Elementary and beyond here and also rased a marvelous black La ra played at Countryside and I was able to Baseball Association for years. To my joy, many of those games were then artici ate. We have loved living within eyesight of the -Tracy F re Station of our neighbors,sand I think we have all they were rebuilding a year or so ago. them terribly when pate. We have gotten to kno Y contributed in some way to.the peace and safety of our Countryside.neighborhood. appreciated with our growing children.- This It has been a safe and quiet area that we have all enjoyed and app , includes the readily accessible, Countryside Park. Parking certain Yn tcobst�uctedsWenalso cannotrhelpnbut feel this has always been manageable as long as the mailboxes are., foxes awestruck by the birds and wildlife that share our area during the various have an amaz gecollect on ofrGreat Horned from the Church, the geese and ducks travel the same route. e od annually. Hawks a Owls that nest within our neighborhoad other smaller birds, end on theColonial. Wayttree and Cear . that will wings use this entire area as a seasonal fly through. They P destroyed. inside looking out. What more could a neighborhood ask for? Surely we must have it arowin least the bui di building a 4 story, 50 unit Lv did have it.all until the City of.Edina decided to change our area by approving , it Waters Senior Liming Housing on Colonial Way. I understand this development ncei it w ll taller stretch to trees will destroy, it will butt up against the Tracy., Fire Station with its service borders Crosstown and it will end at the end of Colonial Church nd parking II retain t3.0%owne' ship of the development. bridge.. Colonial Church is selling this property for $500,000(. ) While the Church is non -profit and does not pay taxes, it will pay taxes on its 300 ownership of this development. The City of Edina will benefit significantly from the taxes that this development will generate. that I have not had any complaints. There is an Having lived in this neighborhood for many years, I cannot say end u turning around in my. driveway. Yes, it drives me to abundance of lost drivers who seem to always _ p and i pores the stop sign at Olinger. I am also distraction! I am painfully aware of the traffic that cruises Tracy g painfully hool is beginning and closing. Tracy Avenue is in less than P Y aware of the traffic at rush hour and when sc painfully aware of the traffic at rush hour and when school is beginning and closing. Tracy Avenue is in less than ideal condition considering the traffic flow that it handles day to day. This would certainly be negatively impactF by additional traffic flow from Colonial Waters Senior Living Housing, particularly since it will be monthly rental: people moving in and people moving out on a regular basis. I would have to question whether the City.of Edina would be ready to improve the quality of Tracy Avenue in order to handle the additional traffic flow. This concrete road has taken a significant beating over the last two years anyway. My other significant concern is whether or not the City of Edina is prepared to install either stop signs or stop lights at the intersection of Crosstown and Tracy Avenue. The traffic flow along Tracy Avenue is borderline dangerous as it is with its current traffic flow at both am /pm school bus runs and regular rush hour traffic times. I shudder to think what the impact will be on our neighborhood when City Hall adds the additional traffic flow from the proposed development. 56,000 square feet of monthly rental residential housing will not operate without vehicles. These would certainly include service vehicles, residential vehicles and visitor vehicles that will all require access and parking. And last but not least, Countryside Park is busy from spring through fall and people park wherever they are able to. This includes in front of my house and in front of my mailbox. I do not make an issue of this since I love the fact that this park is so busy and happy. However, if this new development reduces the already very limited parking spaces, I think it will wreak chaos with all the park patrons and baseball teams. Is it not on your agenda to upgrade Countryside Park next year? It would seem that you all have multiple parties hoping for a bigger piece of a limited pie. And finally, from a very personal standpoint, the current view from my living room windows is of the park, the Fire Station and the wonderful woods along Colonial Drive, which would fall victim to this new development. There is so much that would will be lost to our neighborhood if this enormous development proceeds as planned. 01 neighborhood is so very important to all of us because it is special ... it is quiet, safe, personal and so very noi. threatening. As soon as you start adding numerous residential spaces the doors open to lack of control which makes us all nervous. To lose the view across the park, to lose the predictable flow of wildlife, to no longer see those beautiful tress that stand with such grace behind the Fire Station, to tolerate additional traffic flow ... this is a loss of tremendous proportions and we cannot simply turn our backs on it. We are talking about all of our homes where we raise our families. We are talking about losing value on our properties, properties that will become much less desirable. This is of significant importance to us all. Please hear our hearts with your minds and consider the big picture that will impact a whole neighborhood forever. Marian A. Olson 6201 Hillside Road Edina, MN 55436 -2539 /MAO Susan Howl Subject: Senior Housing Project RECEIVED MAR 12 2910 Dear Mayor Hovland, hurch I've been following the proposed construction of a huge senior - housing complex adjacent to Colonial C d by the developer. On Sunday I walked around the building and in December attended the info session sponsore site. of the 'proposed facility is simply incomprehensible. A building two football fields in length then and The immensity p P as tall as a church steeple is in no way in accor d with the use are asdimportant as the Compr ehensive lf." Neither the size nor appearance and compatibility of a particular Ian � — matches other architecture in our city or indicates the designers know anything style - is it Houston style. about Edina' or care much about preserving its charm.. I am also apprehensive about what will,happen if the complex hits financial difficulties. Is the city going to wind up with a deteriorating white elephant? If so, when the church and the developers comeback to the city council for a zoning have the change oo coa barrel? The gigantic failure and eyesore into something besides senior housing, wont y sweetness of any possible tax revenues needs to be soberly balanced against the risks. The developers claim they cannot reduce the size and scope of the project, that two stories and half 11 as emany rooms is not feasible. They also stated at the December meeting that like it or not, the property developed, and Edina residents will either have to accept this one or else something akin to a "Section -8 Housing Project." No kidding? Are those our only choices? on a I encourage you and the members of our city council to call the developers' bg sewheran Ior betting plans for scale suitable for Edina is out of the question, then they need to be told to build a more reasonable, less risky project will be forthcoming. I predict Edina will come to bitterly regret it should this project be allowed to go forward as planned. Thanks, Jose Hanson 5712 Olinder Blvd (952) 915 -9723 1 r AGE OF E�s IV 0 March 3, 2010 Dear Mayor James Hovland, Kerit�ge of Edina SENIOR/ ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITY Roybet - Rembrandt -.Manor - Tiffany RECEIVED MAR 112010 My name is Maria Field, CEO and owner of Heritage. of Edina, Senior /Assisted Living. When I attended the council meeting on Feb. 16, 2010; I was very disappointed that no one mentioned Heritage of Edina Assisted Living, even though we have been here for 50 years. The. fact that we have been_ taxpayers for all of those y t ears doesn' seem to matter either, and yet'when I.add up the years and amounts of property taxes we have paid it is in the millions. Then when you add up all the other taxes we pay on goods .and services, plus the people we employ and the Edina.. Residents we have cared for, we feel we have added many more millions to the community in 50 years. To be brushed aside as if we don't.make a difference makes it seem the life of Wayne Field, the founder, really didn't matter, like his. belief in "Reverence for Life " - was for naught. Wayne died in Feb. 2009; and we all promised him we would carry on his legacy. We have cared' for generations of families and have had to change from a nursing home and 3 retirement homes to all Assisted Living in 1999 because of the overbuilding of retirement buildings and the decrease of residents, which_. created a situation where we couldn't sell the complex and just about went "under. . By 2001 we were running at around 90% capacity which continued until 2007. Then in 2008 we"had a large number of deaths of Residents who had lived with us for many years and have not been able to recoup since. then because of the economy and, especially because potential residents cannot sell their homes. Why would you approve of a non -tax paying entity to be built when it will also need our tax dollars to subsidize it? Where is the.fairness to force us as tax payers. to help put competitor in . business; while probably putting us out of business ?.. With State tax revenues in decline, where is the money coming from ?. The fact that they are spending 40- million- on 150 units when we have 257 apts. and a mortgage of 13 million is why they will have to charge $3,000:00 to $9,000.00 per resident and we only charge $1,000.00 to $5,000.00.- Heritage of Edina is only 2.9.miles from_ the. site and only one of at least a dozen Assisted Living facilities in the area of Edina, Richfield and Bloomington. We are.private pay, but 1/3 of our Residents are in the Elderly Waiver program. The forecast for the future is rather bleak for starting another Assisted. Living facility at this time. If the Council could hold off until the economy improves, it would. be better for everyone. As a resident and voter in Edina, as I did vote for each of you on the City Council, I would hope you are guided by the Edina Vision 20%20 mission statement to "guide the development and redevelopment of lands within the City all in a'manner which sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by the residents and business of Edina". We at Heritage of Edina .believe that. approving another 150 units is not in the best interest of business or residents at this time. Thank ou, Mi Field, CEO 3434 Heritaqe Drive, Edina; Minnesota 55435 o Phone: 952 -920 -9145 o Fax: 952- 915 -5411 Susan Howl ubject: FW: Colonial Living Waters RECEIVED LIAR 11 From: FranzSrgaol.com [mailto:FranzSr @aol : com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:32 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague; JhHoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Colonial Living Waters Edina City Officials; As an Edina for some 62 years, I have been extremely proud of o M vvv fe a /nd I have hadovery parks, occasions to playgrounds, commercial sites, fire and, police, are the best in the Nation y object to the management of our resources. We built ofrthat time. Now Olinger appearrs here Isla possibility ago lut and enjoyed a quiet; peaceful, vibrant neighborhood fo Countryside area could be destroyed by the Colonial of this project and he negatProject. ve effects t would our ve,on tour area. The construction. I am sure you are aware of.the size P proposed low income units would bring more ogpams they have sponsored welcome oer the years ye Countryside. hey:have made no outreach Colonial is proud of the Global outreach P to their local neighbors. We live across the street from the c that a huge building with a: roof peaking as high, as their proposal. You would think that it might occur to the members The church tower might infringe on our view of the r That not the definition of al stable home environment. P values. s There is Project is an apartment. People move in and out obviously a profit to be gained from this construction. At our expense. We urge you to deny the construction of this masdsdi nel our voice to all of those neighbors vrh object to this happening in your own back yard. We will be attending meetings and adding Franz and Joanie Burris William & Judith Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 - 927 -9421 Edina City Council RECEIVED March 9, 2010 Dear Council Members; gAR I i IN I am writing regarding the proposed senior apartment complex in the Countryside neighborhood. When we moved here we purchased our home because it was in a very nice residential area in a suburb close to highways with easy access to Minneapolis. The fire station was enlarged a couple of years ago and fits the community nicely. A 4 story apartment building does not fit the community. We do not understand how this zoning change started out as one that would accommodate a nursing home and turned into one that is made up of; 51 one BR units, 22 one BR plus den units, 24 two BR units, 10 two BR units plus den, 5 three BR units, 28 memory support units and 10 care suites. One hundred and twelve units or 75% of the building will be apartment units, so even though it is being called a senior living facility in reality it is an apartment building. We hope you have looked at the site. We also hope you are listening to the neighbors that have a vested interest in the neighborhood. The proposed apartment building is too large (the length of two football fields, 95 feet wide and 45 plus feet tall). It will be a wall behind Countryside Park. It is being designed to maximize profit for a business that has no vested interest in our community. The neighbors can see that there has been no thought given to the community and the people that live nearby. This complex will affect more than the neighbors that live within 1,000 feet of the building. There are other concerns such as traffic, light/smell and noise pollution, pollution to the creek and lower property values. The design of the building does not even fit the construction design of the fire station or the church. We are not asking you to remove a are asking you to keep the zoning built in a residential neighborhood. have all supported by keeping our every year. Thank you, Bill Rodgers building that is already in the neighborhood. We is it is and not allow an apartment building to be Let us maintain the neigborhood and city we property within city codes, . and paying our taxes Susan Howl From: Lynette.Biunno Sent: Mond ay,�March`08, 2010 8:37 AM Cc: Susan Howl. Subject: FW:'Growing opposition to Living Waters'project on HWY. 62 Attachments: Petition against Living Waters.pdf RECEIVED MAR 1 1 2010 Lynette Biunno City.of Edina'Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com From: Kent Grave)le [ mailto :kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:22 AM To Lynette Biunno Cc: ghughes @ci.edina; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Growing opposition to Living Waters project on Hwy. 62 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, The Countryside Horizons Project informed me about a week ago of the Living Waters project by Colonial Church on Highway 62 and then asked me to help circulate a petition opposing it. Attached are the names. and addresses of persons I approached at the Democratic Convention at the Valley View Middle School yesterday and who are opposed to the project. I believe other members of the Countryside Horizons Project will or have approached members of the Republican Party with a similar petition. I think there is bi- partisan opposition to this project in the community because it reduces our green space and it will increase the amount of traffic on Tracy Avenue and central Edina in general. I hope you will oppose the Living Waters project. Thank you for your consideration. Kent B. Gravelle 5609 Tracy Avenue Edina, MN 55436 (952) 922 -8596 i PETITION OPPOSING LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBD"ON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROMCT If the Edina Planning Commission and City Council give final approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football fields wide to be located near the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Highway 62 (behind the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of central Edina will be changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy Avenue and the surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to4ifis project and request that the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. Name Address 1, tN; ��AV tI� 56,og -r4AtY AVE. EJZ -)JA kzt*a?,AV£tLL(,40�.to+�i 2. Tome s ' S 2lot 3 e- le, c-,un, d 4. , 5. • b ol l ('a A 6.� MGlges-R- P mac. cofi, 7. 8. ,5-7 C �V4� Jr &LO 9. riG e 10. '11.1 A �rTn,, ►YI I` �i1� - c7, I J C' ���� � � ���.• 3809 �DaP� five- v 5 13. c� 14. PETITION OPPOSING LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT If the Edina Planning Commission and City Council give final approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football fields wide to be located new the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Highway 62 (behind the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of central Edina will be changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy Avenue and the surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to this project and request that the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. Name Address Email 16. Net rk A-'0fa*J D1J 6x c74 B r,D L .9r of Ss 4 3i 18. FacA ✓' -bA�v- SS4 3 I 'I UcL h vWe � s 24", 2 1. M QY lah e- h�-Lll 4. I 1 23. 24. % i,7 3-� A"r S • 5"3 � �FctuS �� Ln� ' 25 . A Pt K a�-I Tb o M , E,�-k l/ 261 C � 530 gl1kp •Uf4f - 27. IWO 28. S���� TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: The Harris Family /via, Edina Planning Department . RE: The Waters DATE: March 4, 2010 Mrs. Harris called the Planning Department and expressed the opinion that Edina doesn't need another assisted living facility. Mrs. Harris also expressed the opinion that too many large trees will be removed to "make -way" for this development. Cary Teague Director of Planning 5801 West 50th Street Edina Mn 55424 Dear Mr. Teague, March 3, 2010 Re: Proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina development I was unable to attend the February 16 meeting of the City Council at which time preliminary approval for the rezoning and development plan for the above project was given by the Council. However, on January 17, I communicated my concerns and opposition to the plan in writing to the Planning Commission. An 8" x 10" photo of the Presbyterian Home at as the Waters n in Richfield is enclosed. This is the same height development. It is HUGE. A facility of this size would be totally inappropriate for the site that has been proposed. The plan calls for a building two football fields in length, 600 feet wide and four stories in height. In my opinion, the Council has not served the residents of the Countryside District well by giving preliminary approval to this behemoth development out told that presentations at the February 16 Council meeting pointing the huge size of the development were received impassively by Council members. Let me state again my objections and concerns. The increased traffic now will only add to the existing heavy traffic on Tracy Avenue. Exiting from Highway 62 (from both directions) is hazardous because visibility is restricted by the bridge railings. If a semaphore(s) are erected to control the flow of traffic the area will cease looking like a residential area. The size of the proposed development destroys the quiet neighborhood aura that has been an asset of the Countryside District. I am fearful this will have a negative impact on housing values. Notification of the proposed development has been distributed only to residents living within 1000 feet of the property. The size of the development will affect all residents living.between Highway 62 and Vernon Ave. Yet only a few residents have been notified. I understand that the City has complied with the letter of the law. However, there are still many residents that are not informed about this project. I would expect you, as an elected city official, to act as an advocate for residents and instruct the Planning Department to go beyond the statutes and inform all residents within at least one mile of the site. Final approval of the Waters development sets a horrible precedent for more commercial type development in this area and therefore more potential deterioration of property values. I would urge you as a responsible member of the City Council to do your own due diligence on this proposal to determine that it is, indeed, inappropriate to place the facility in a residential area. Please vote NO when it is time to vote for final approval. Sincerely, Spencer A. Turner 6208 Hillside Rd. Edina, MN 55436 952 -929 -6216 sturnerl2i io. *A 1 RECEIVED FEB 19 2010 Susan Howl Subject: Proposed Living Waters Project Mayor James Hovland and Council Members, I would like to clarify my concerns voiced at the recent Council meeting. I was prepared to just listen, but surprised at the size of the project, the look of the project and a remark that those who challenged the project are resistant to change, the stewards of the land quote, and the promotion of the Church values. Colonial Church has been a good neighbor, but prior to the letter of neighbors 1000 ft away, I had not heard of this plan. Here are my main points of concern: *This is a very large for profit industry, not necessarily a mission to care for elderly, that plans to house 1500 people, with staff and services that will be on- going. If there would be a possibility of loss of income for the developer, what could this "large" facility convert too? * The design is still not appropriate for a neighborhood, even with a different color on the siding..it is institutional *The traffic study was vague and not encompassing of the true picture at different times of the day in our neighborhood *I do not object to 3 stories, but already see the Church Steeple lit up from a bedroom window on Jeff Place ... a four story building would appear like a Westin Hotel..If the plan is approved, please request a design that would reduce lighting on the top floors, as they mentioned the lighting in the parking lot. In speaking with a civil engineer, he stated that was possible *The watershed issue and it's impact on our old systems I believe that the picture in the Sun Current, did not accurately mimic the size. I realize that this is Colonial's land,.but this is a valued neighborhood"and the decision is not about honored members of a respected Church, but an investment, that impacts us for many years to come. All of our neighbors should be respected in this endeavor, and compromises discussed to build a profitable building that respects a community. Now is the time to reintroduce a discussion of size and style. A good developer can address those concerns. Liz Beer 5804 Jeff Place Edina, N4N 55436 952- 922 -0164 To: EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION January 28, 2010 From: William Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 My name is Bill Rodgers. My wife, Judith and I live about two blocks from the proposed 4 story 150 unit assisted living facility at 6200 Colonial Way, Edina. We attended the planning commission meeting on January 28, 2010. When supporters were asked to stand at the meeting and a majority of the attendees stood, that was a little intimidating. We wondered how many lived in the neighborhood and how many would want a 4 story building in their backyard. Some of our concerns that were touched on and others that we did not voice at the meeting include the following: ■ The fact that a 4 story building is being considered does not fit in with a residential area. When we purchased our home the fact that this was a nice, quiet neighborhood was a major reason we purchased our home. ■ With the economy situation, we have lost value on our home along with many other home owners. We feel that building a 4 story nursing facility in the neighborhood will reduce home values even more. ■ Nursing homes are an industry that is growing and changing. From our personal experience nursing homes are scaling down in size. A 4 story 150 unit facility is too large in this area. ■ My 96 year old mother -in -law has been in two "green house" units that are more like homes with 6 -12 seniors. I forwarded an e-mail describing these units. She is now in a 1 story 34 unit nursing home in Waconia that is supported by the Moravian Church. Again this is a way to scale down the scope of the proposed 4 story 150 unit Facility. ■ Traffic and the safety of school children and residents is a major concern. Presently traffic is an issue during school hours. Many students drive to and from school or are given rides by their families. In addition school buses are lined up on Tracy for several blocks during morning and evening schools start and close. The school even has a traffic person directing traffic during these hours. Consider there are inexperienced drivers and then the addition of the employees of the nursing homes rushing to and from work. ■ Shift change at the nursing home would include up to 90 (45 employees per shift) nursing home employees leaving and coming to the facility between 7 - 9 AM and 3 - 5 PM. This additional traffic will add to the safety issues. _ (� In addition, 90 employees will be coming and going at 10 - 11 PM. This will create traffic that we do not have now or need in a residential neighborhood. Many factories do not have shift changes any larger than this. With 150 seniors there will be additional traffic that was not considered during the meeting, examples include: doctors, vendors, specialists, buses and vans taking seniors shopping and to appointments, waste pickups, cleaner and laundry services and delivery vans such as UPS and Fed Ex. The nursing home industry requires deliveries and services from other industries that use trucks and vans. This is traffic that we do not have now. Consider this is a residential neighborhood. Visitors are another issue that was down played at the meeting. If only half of the residents have visitors that amounts to 75 cars coming and going between a couple of hours in the evenings. We also do not understand the financial relationship between the Colonial Church and the Waters Senior Living. Company. How much of the profit will be shared with the church and will it be taxable income to the church? Thank you listening and for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Bill Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 - 927 -9421 .1ackie. Hoo enakker From: Roger Bentley <rogerreesbentley @hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:35 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed construction by Colonial Church I will not be able to attend this evening's hearing, but I wanted to voice my opposition to the plan. In a word; traffic. Traffic at the intersection of Tracy Ave and Vallemorning road is already ng, traffic congested and often dangerous, with traffic. entering and .exiting Rt. 62. In the 9 backs up 8 to 1'0 cars, creating a safety hazard. Adding ea0tin units, safety haze dsFurther the proximity to intersection would significantly add to that congestion, 9 the fire station with the increased congestion could exacerbate the problem'. One hundred and fifty units is simply too large. I would not be oppose units ttta latter date. 50 units. That way we could access impact and possibly consider add Roger and Jan Bentley 6338 Valley View Road Edina Your E -mail and More On- the -Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now. i y, City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55224 January 25, 2010 Re: Colonial Church Proposal Case File: 2010- 0001 -10a Dear Persons, I write „in.,strong oppositi6n to the above referenced proposal specifically because the' proposed height is too tall for the surrounding' neighborhood. The project proposes a 4 story building which is twice the height of any other housing in ' the iinmediate surrounding area. Taller than many trees, a building of this size will loom over the surrounding neighborhood and significantly degrade its semi -rural nature. While neighbors have been provided with artists' renditions of the proposed building, they do +. not accurately portray its height relative to other surrounding physical structures, making the building,seem smaller, than it actually will be. A four story building will be as high as the -steeple on,the- Colonial Church, which is fine for a church steeple, not a building hundreds of feet long in this neighborhood. An urban sized 4 story building contrasts too strongly with the quiet peacefulness of the surrounding area and the adjacent Bredesen Park. Not only is height itself a serious concern, light coming from such a large building and the surrounding grounds at night will contrast greatly with the less brightly lit neighborhood. The sky in the direction of the complex will be clearly lit up. Light, visible at great distance, will destroy the peaceful sense one feels upon coming home in the evening. This will be perceived as a great nuisance to those accustom to the quiet, darkened and peaceful environment the neighbors of Colonial Church currently. enj oy. In summary I oppose approval of the project because of its adverse impact on the visual environment of the neighborhood and the quiet enjoyment of such citizens currently erij oy. Sincerely, a� Lawrence J. Kerzner e 5828 Jeff Place Edina MN 55436 ackie Hoo enakker From: Paul Axt <paxt @earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 9:04 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: 'William Melin' Subject: Case File: 2010 - 0001 -10a Dear Ms. Hoogenaker: I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposal for construction of The Waters senior assisted living facility on Colonial Church property located at 6200 Colonial Way, Edina. A building of such nature is grossly inconsistent with the single family homes that currently make up the surrounding neighborhoods. Construction of the facility will only serve to decrease the values of residential properties within close proximity to the proposed site due to the certain and significant increase of motor vehicle traffic to and from the site, and the perception of "commercializing" the neighborhood. (and on Tracy Avenue), I am particularly concerned about the increased flow of traffic and immediately ladjacent tlo Olinger Bouleva d and Tracy which would undoubtedly diminish the value of all homes on Avenue between Vernon Avenue and Hwy 62. Olinger Boulevard is already a busy street, as it commonly serves as a "cut through" from Vernon Avenue to Hwy 62. The addition of pfacility elmp oo ees and vtlsitors increase the volume of traffic on Olinger Boulevard every day as construction the facility. Also, the intersection at Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and the exit ramp to Tracy from westbound Hwy 62 is already dangerous (impaired sight lines) and overly congested, especially during morning and afternoon commutes. Constructing the facility at the proposed site will greatly increase traffic at the intersection making it even more difficult for vehicles to access Tracy Avenue from the highway off ramp and Valley View Road. Before voting on the proposal, and at the very least, I would AenuDeeand Hwy 62, which includes a statistically is study veloper to conduct a comprehensive on both Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue between Vernon significant analysis of current traffic volume and an estimation should be anticipated to ALL residents on vehicle to resulting from building on the proposed site. The traffic y Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue between Vernon Avenue and Hwy 62. Lastly, I feel strongly that ALL residents on Tracy Avenue osaI as ALL would ld be direcbtly impacted by the inc eased flow 6of should be given formal notice of the Developer's prop traffic to and from the proposed site. Limiting the notification her taxpaying o y re�ide residents are guaraooeed to be adversely proposed site might be the law, but does a serious disservice to of affected if the proposal is approved by the City. I respectfully ask the City of Edina to deny the developer's request. Thank you, Paul Axt 6109 Olinger Boulevard Edina, MN 55436 952 - 925 -1440 Jackie Hoogenakker From: tedspringer @aol.com Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:10 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Hearing on THE WATERS complex To: Edina Planning Department From: Nancy and Ted Springer Dear Planners... As long -time residents of Edina (over 40 years) we just wanted to express our enthusiastic approval of the proposed senior assisted living facility. We have lived in the neighborhood for many years - -our family home of 30 years was on Jeff Place and we have lived in Nine Mile Village for some 12 years. Thus the prospect of continuing to live in the same neighborhood as tenants at The Waters is hugely exciting for us. Edina can be proud to offer such a well - planned facility as our Village population (and that of the country in general) ages. It is a supportive and conscientious response to this need. Thanks for whatever you can do to help make the project a reality. Sincerely, Nancy and Ted Springer 6300 Pheasant Ct. Edina, MN 55436 ackie Hoo enakker. From:' Tim Robb <tgrobb @yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 6:45 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: The waters addition of Edina 0 osed to the building of any large commercial structure in our neighborliood•a little more Weare'strongly pp the C'omprehens'ive Guide Plan means nothing in Edina. It seems like every time someone wi . money than the next guy comes along and promises more tax revenue, Edina is more than willing to bend over backward to change the comp. plan. All in the name of tax revenue- ulation or utservices an the dollars ity We would city running you.have to either charge more to the residents p p . be happy, to accept the`higher taxes or a cut in services, if thua Would lse wakin was more fr 'turning th 0 years�agoI� seems Eden Prairie!! There is a good reason why Edina was lain 1 nowadays and a great revenue enhancer. But, that as if population compression is a popular city planning . Y g is not why we moved here, we left Minneapolis to have.a little more space. The other major problem is the whole Tracey Ave 62 interchange. Sometimes ent of right now itcan s and speed limits cross Tracey to go West bound on 62. Mainly because there is no enforcement traffic out there. What is going to on Tracey. I have never in 7 years of'living workers t that complex running oads. You are going to have to address happen when you add 150 residents and that FIRST, the infrastructure is going to have to be changed to accommodate more peak traffic. And who will pay for that ............. plan. This whole area should remain as R1 zoning. In conclusion;-we are opposed to this change. in the comp There are plenty of empty commercial buildings just a few ,miles west of this location that don't need rezoning ,miles make this work. Again, if it is a revenue issue either cut services or raise taxes, don't sell us out for more tax revenue an d inconvenience in our daily lives. Thanks, Tim Robb 6221 Hillside Road 1 RECEIVED FE8 2 3 2010 Susan Howl Subject: Waters Senior development concerns Hello council members and mayor My name is Chuck Henninger and my wife along with three children reside at 5816 Jeff Place. I contact you about some concerns over the planed Waters Senior development. I attended the meeting on Tuesday, February 16 until 8:45 and watched the remaining portion online. I have spoken with some neighbors, Cary Teague, John Keprios, a contact at Barr engineering(consultants for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed district and left a message for Kevin Bigalke at the Nine Mile Creek Watershed district. I did so to learn as much as possible in a short period of time. Please reveiw my questions,thoughts and concerns; 1) Did you discuss /review the rules and requirements for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed district? There are some very real concerns regarding this project. 2) Why wasn't John Keprios asked for his input? Countryside Park has an approved Master Plan with Phase One dollars allocated /approved? This will increase traffic at the Park during the phases and upon completion. Potentially costing the City of Edina additional dollars when residents and spectators of Park events have to view the development leading to the city having to address the visibility issue with additional landscaping. 3) Did you ask for a study on highway. noise? The development is removing a very large area of tre and land thus exposing residents to increased levels of highway noise. The Countryside Park Master Plan includes two pathways from the donated parking lot allowing for access to the interior of the park thus creating incresed visibility and more trees removed. 4) How is it that the Church can count the spaces in the parking lo (next to Countryside Park) that they donated to the city? The Church still can use them but so can the park and events will overlap sometimes. How will this issued be addressed? 5) Did you consult with the Police and the Fire Department(near by) to understand any concerns they might have? What were the results of that discussion? 6) Why didn't the developer bring the height of the project to the presentation? Why wasn't this required before moving forward? A project with four floors will be visible form the top floor of our home. In conclusion, I challenge Council members and Mayor Hovlund to step back and view the site again with these points in mind. The residents in the area are concerned with this project and the lack of careful consideration regarding it. Regards Chuck Henninger City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50`x' Street Edina, MN 55224 February 13, 2010 Re: Colonial Church Proposal Case File: 2010- 0001 -10a Dear City Council Members, I write in strong opposition to the above referenced proposal specifically because the proposed height is too tall for the surrounding neighborhood. The project proposes a four story building which is twice the height of any other housing in the immediate surrounding area. Taller than many trees,. a building of this size will loom over the surrounding neighborhood and significantly degrade its semi -rural nature. While neighbors have been provided with artists' renditions of the proposed' building, these drawings do not accurately portray the building's height relative to other surrounding physical structures making it seem smaller than it actually will be. A four story building will be at least as high as the bell tower on the Colonial Church, which is fine for a church steeple, not for a building hundreds of feet long in this neighborhood. An urban sized four story building contrasts too strongly with the quiet peacefulness of the surrounding area and the adjacent Bredesen Park. The presence of this building will in, my opinion also seriously degrade the park like visual space on the adjacent highway 62 and serve to extend the very urban, downtown like feel of the 62 - France Avenue interchange to this, more peaceful area. Not only is height itself a serious concern, light coming from such a large building and the surrounding grounds at night will contrast greatly with the less brightly lit neighborhood. The sky in the direction of the complex will be clearly lit up. Light, visible at great distance. will destroy the peaceful sense one feels upon coming home in the evening. This will be perceived as a great nuisance to those accustom to the quiet darkened and peaceful environment the neighbors of.Colonial Church currently enjoy. I am also concerned about street traffic and understand an updated traffic study was to be completed to. analyze patterns during the months when school is in session. Has that analysis been completed and opened for public discussion? In summary I oppose approval of the project because of its adverse impact on the visual esthetic of the neighborhood and the quiet enjoyment of such citizens currently enjoy. Sincerely, Lawrence J. Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place Edina MN 55436 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: stanleybn @aol.com Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 6:28 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Campiander @aol.com Subject: Case File 2010 - 0001 -1a Colonial Church Senior Assisted Living Facility As adjacent property owners we received the February 6, 2010 notie in regard to the above subject proposed Senior Assisted Living Facility. In principal, we do not object to this proposal, except for two items, (1) the lack of a good site plan that will show exactly where the new structure will be located vs the existing church and (2) it is impossible to judge the appearance of a four story building in our residential setting without some kind of visual representation. Until these two items are addressed my wife and I cannot be in favor of this project. Hopefully, your staff could create an animated visual to give a better understanding of the building's appearance. I have copied the president of our homeowners association (Nine Mlle Village) so that she is aware of our concerns. Thank you. Stanley & Joan Nickells 6360 Red Fox Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 925 -7505 February 9,,2010 RECEIVED EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEB 2 ZQ}� RE: Colonial Church Development City Hall 4801 W 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 . Dear City Council, Recently I moved to Nine Mile Village, which is adjacent to Colonial Church in Edina. Rec y While I welcome the Church as a neighbor, I amconcerned our story building, with 150 Preliminary Development Plan for senior asses living. units in a small space, is simply oversized in height and density for this part of Edina. This is a residential area, and one of the reason helm all other structures and renders oved here was the village atmosphere. A very large four story building your current zoning code as meatungless. 1 su est that the city explore methods to reduce the size and height ial zoning rin the area. gg history and reside that it is more in harmony with the community rY Sincerely, Peter P Bundy 6344 Pheasant Ct Edina, NIN 55436 cc: Nine Mile Village Board Edina Planning Dept. To: EDINA CITY COUNCIL From: William Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 February 11, 2010 Subject: Case File 2010- 0001 -10a My name is Bill Rodgers. My wife, Judith and I live on the corner of Arbour Lane and Tracy Ave, a tennis court and 2 houses beyond the proposed high rise, 4 story 150 unit assisted living facility (!t is listed on the Waters website as 5 floors above ground) at 6200 Colonial Way, Edina. The picture in the Star Tribune also shows 5 floors. How many floors above ground is this business? We attended the planning commission meeting on January 27, 2010. When supporters of the Waters plan were asked to stand and a majority of the attendees rose it was a little intimidating. We wondered how many lived in the neighborhood and how many of those standing would want a 4 or 5 story building in their backyard. We are not against nursing homes. My father was confined to one until he was 93. My mother in law is presently in a nursing home in Waconia. She is 96. Both parents were in several nursing homes as their needs changed. None of the homes were in residential areas and none were 4 or 5 stories with 150 units. The only reason we can see for such a large facility is to maximize profits for the owners. Consider monthly costs average $4M -$7M. Our greatest concerns are the size of the proposed Waters Building, Its affect on property values and the traffic and safety issues that a four or five story 150 unit will generate. The nursing home in Waconia is a single story 37 unit facility that would look wonderful in Edina. A traffic study was made during the summer months and did not take into consideration the High School and Middle, School traffic which includes back ups in the morning and evenings that make it difficult to exit Crosstown onto Tracy. With employees of the nursing home leaving and coming to work combined with young drivers and school buses it will result in safety issues. What was not mentioned in the Planning Commission Meeting are the service vehicles necessary to support 24/7 care - Food Service, Trash, Medical Care, Snowplowing and Lawn Service. The audience was also led to believe that there are few visitors to the patients. Will another traffic study be completed and will it consider all the issues related to a 24/7 business? Also consider your drive along Crosstown Highway. How many 4 or 5 story buildings do you see from the time you pass France Ave until you reach Highway 169? You are correct that whole area is considered residential and does not have large buildings other than schools, churches, a fire station, parks and green space. We talked to a realtor about property values around a multi story nursing home in our area. They said there would be some buyers that would not even look at a home in the vicinity of a high rise building. Our property values have already dropped due to the present economy. We do not need another drop in residential home values when a change is made to a residential area by approving a multi story nursing home and affordable housing. This area is not near a mall like the large Colony Senior Living facility in Eden Prairie that is three stories tall, not in a residential community and has the infrastructure to handle the 24/7 traffic safely. Please consider what approving. this project will do to the image of Edina, as a desirable residential suburb,. and to the already declining home values. If you must approve a nursing home scale down the size and scope of the project to better fit the community. Thank you, Bill Rodgers Q� 1 'ackie Hoo enakker From: Spence Turner <STURNERI2 @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 4:05 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject:" rezoning for Colonial Church of Edina I have already expressed my concerns in a letter sent to the Edina Planning Department dated January 19. I'm curious as to why only residents living within feet (about.3 blocks) ate the only ones notified of the hearing on February 16. This proposed rezoning affects many more residents than.that. Your:reply will tie_appreciated. Thank you. Spencer Turner 6208 Hillside Rd sturnerl 2Cc)comcast. net Jackie Hoogenakker From: FranzSr @aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 3:17 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Colonial Church senior assisted living facility To: Edina City Council As an Edina resident for 64 years and a property owner located within 1000 feet of the proposed Colonial Church 150 unit senior assisted living facility, I must voice my extreme displeasure with and objection to the proposed plan. Our neighborhood is blessed with a marvelous playground and park, a modern fire hall, and two very quiet churches. All of which offer wonderful benefits to the immediate neighborhood, and at the same time, attract many users from the western suburbs. Adding this proposed facility will bring hundreds of people to our neighborhood on a daily basis. Two years ago we voted to preserve our lakes and ponds and natural environment with our tax dollars. The City of Edina has taken the conservation path for many years and is an example to other suburbs. The rezoning and construction will be disruptive and the proposed end result will be beneficial only to a very small minority. I imagine there will be a financial gain to the church and other individuals at our expense, as well. This is unacceptable to me and all of my neighbors. There remains plenty of properly zoned space available at Southdale. In your Project (Propject) description, you mention construction of a facility on the vacant portion of the church site. The site is not vacant. Hundreds of trees, many deer, and other animals inhabit the vacant site. If this construction is approved, we will no doubt see more natural areas deleted in favor of condos, high rise apartments, etc. We elected you folks to represent the majority interests in Edina. The majority of residents in this area oppose this construction. Please act responsibly and preserve our wonderful community. Franz and Joanie Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Edina 55436 952 920 1529 Jackie Hoo enakker From: suckowziemer @comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:58 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010 - 0001 -10a Hello: We are writing to share comments '(if it's not too late) about the proposed senior assisted living facility at 6200 Colonial Way in Edina (case file 2010- 0001 -10a. We are residents at 5900 Olinger Blvd. in Edina. dens'ity in the We are generally supportive of the proposed - facility, and also support i v neighborhood. Our concerns are related.to the increase in traffic (due o c staff, olunteers and family who will access the facility). at Tracy Avenue and the exit/entrance ramp to Hwy. 62. During "peak traffic hours and occasionally other times, it can be very difficult to turn Avenue facili{yrom the exit ramp at Hwy. 62. We wonder what the city.will do to mitigate that should the new increase traffic at the. intersection. In addition, we would encourage the city to add pedestrian lighting to Tracy Avenue these and Olinget er Blvd. to improve safety of pedestrians given there is likely to be increased traffic on routes to Colonial Way and the new facility. The sidewalks on Tracy and Olinger are used to access, Countryside Park and Bredesen, but are very dark, with only occassionally street lights at intersections. Given the increase in traffic to the facility, it would help to have improved lighting (primarily for pedestrians but also street lighting) to improve safety for pedestrians and drivers. Thank you. Holly Ziemer and Steve Suckow 1 Mike Fischer, Planning Commission Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50TH ST. EDINA, MN 55424. Dear Commissioner Fischer: I'm writing this letter in support of the proposed Waters Senior Living center. In light of thinking about this matter, I spent some time today and visited two nearby facilities of similar intent, which are .4 and .6 miles from my house. They are the Sunrise facility(18605 Old Excelsior Blvd. Minnetonka) and the Frazer Excelsior Courts (in Minnetonka). Here is a photo of the Sunrise Facility: I've put two photos together to illustrate that there are residences right across the street. I found some documentation from the Minnetonka City Council that gives some background on their deliberations. (http://www.eminnetonka.com/news events /projects /planning /18605 old excelsior /cc staff report 010504.po Aside from some requests with regard to landscaping, there seemed to be no major objections to this facility from the "neighbors" when it was put in. Interestingly enough, when you go across Highway 7 and look north you see this: That is to note that there is no landscaping in front of the Sunrise facility and the neighbors across the street have an "unobstructed view ". As I was taking these photos I was able to talk to 2 neighbors and I asked them if they felt the "Sunrise" facility detracted from their value. They both said no, that it was so well built and gracious looking it ADDED to their value. I should also note that because of access to a Target store and my personal health commitment I oft times bike or walk the 1 %: miles from my house to the Target. Right along the primary access road to the Sunrise facility. I have noticed NO significant increase in traffic along that road, which is still very pedestrian /biker friendly. A little further down the road and on the south side of highway 7 is the Fraser Excelsior Courts, for developmentally disabled individuals. Here is a picture of that facility: x43 �+rX.Y 12 4 A Granted, it is 2 story ... but there are at least 5 houses across from it with a clear view. There was NO protest on it's development when it was put in 10 years ago. (Interestingly it technically is a "Section 8" housing, which has an inordinately bad "rap" because of some particular troublesome projects across the country.) Again, where Excelsior Blvd. goes in.front of this is my weekend long" bike trek route, which I have been doing for over 15 years. I've never had trouble with traffic from this facility. (The Minnetonka High School, 3 blocks west of this facility, however, does cause a problem at times!) I .personally, at age 57, am getting to the point where I could see ending up in an assisted living facility such as the Water's Senior Uving center. I have. no designs upon the Waters, but I would be proud to help leave it as a legacy no matter where I end up. In light of my experience, in the Minnetonka /Shorewood area (resident for 23 years) frankly I'm "dumbfounded" by the objections given to the Water's project .by the "residents ` I'm having a hard time following the logic of their objections. I would hope that you as the Mayor and the Council may execute some considered judgment on this and perhaps come to a different conclusion than some, people have come too ... on perhaps "shaky" logical grounds. You can add my voice in support, although I'm fully aware I only have an Aunt, Uncle, Cousin (wife and 3 children) who live in Edina ... and have no objections... so I would say 1 have a "minor" Edina connection, aside from my involvement with Colonial Church. Yours, Mark Hugo Steven and Catherine Thatcher 6201 Creek Valley Road Edina, MN 55439 June 23, 2010 Kevin Staunton Edina Planning Commission Edina City Hall Edina, MN 55424 Re: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Dear Mr. Staunton, We are writing to strongly support The Waters Senior Living of Edina. Edina needs more senior housing. Many Edina seniors would like to continue living in Edina, and this project would allow them to do so. It would also help to free up single family homes for young families with kids in our schools. This is a good location for the project. It has good freeway access but it is still away from residents. The fire station and a tall tree berm will block the view from the east, west and north. Traffic studies have shown that it will generate little additional traffic in the area. This project is well designed to appeal to seniors and their families. It will have good amenities but will be reasonably priced. The developer has a lot of experience with other similar projects, especially the Colony in Eden Prairie. The developer has recently made significant changes to accommodate its neighbors. It has reduced the height to 3 stories and the number of units to 139. It also modified the front of the building to make it more architecturally interesting and redesigned the roof to make it look more residential. We are asking the Planning Commission to approve this project at its June 30 meeting. Very truly yours, baa " Steven and Catherine Thatcher Michael Fischer Planning Commission Chairperson Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Fischer We are writing to inform you of our support of the proposed Waters Senior Living Center that is to be built by the Edina fire station and Colonial Church. As you know, Edina has a large percentage of residents who are over 65 and will be in need of this type of housing. Although we live in Minneapolis at present, our church is Colonial and the majority of our shopping is done in Edina. Consequently, we are looking forward to living there when the building is completed. The building's height seems to be a point of contention with the neighbors and the developers have modified that by eliminating the fourth floor. Th( artist's rendering presents an attractive three story building with attractive landscaping and tree plantings. We believe this development will be a financial asset to Edina and a good use of this undeveloped land as well as a benefit to many residents who will be needing this type of home in the near future. Sincerely Yours Charlie & Maxine Ernst GoRil O� June 21, 2010 Mike Fischer, Planning Commission Chair Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Commissioner Fischer, EC1E. WRVE Rin, I am writing in support of "The Waters" Senior Living Center, proposed to be built on property of Colonial Church next to the Crosstown Highway. I have studied the drawings and proposals for this facility and believe it will be an asset to the City of Edina and to many current and future residents of this city. As a lifelong Edina resident I believe this project to be completely in keeping with the quality and beauty of homes in Edina as well as offering a needed service to our aging population. My Mother lives in a senior complex in another city. The designs and amenities of The Waters are exactly what she was looking for. This facility should be a highly sought after address for future Edina Senior Citizens. I understand that neighbors and others have voiced concerns about this project's size and possible changes in traffic in the area. Knowing this the developers have met with and listened to these concerns and made changes in the designs to alleviate these concerns. Their responsiveness and desire to work with the neighborhood shows that The Waters will be a good neighbor in our community. The location is perfect for a facility of this type as the planning commission recognized when they gave their preliminary approval. The Crosstown offers easy access without traffic in the neighborhood. The Fire Station and park are a buffer, removing the project to a distance more than double City of Edina requirements from nearby homes. The plans include ample parking, additional quality trees on the property and large set backs. The Waters should be a beautiful asset to the Countryside Neighborhood. I urge you, and the City Council to approve this project in keeping with quality development in our ci+I and in response to current and future needs of our residents. Si �e,Iy, Beth Henrich 4113 W. 45th St. Edina, MN 55424 As a 35 year resident of Edina, I believe this project to be completely in keeping with the;,golity.and beauty of homes in Edina as well as offering a needed service to our aging pop ulation.`'When the time comes, believe I will be very interested in moving into this facility! I live in Morningside. The neighborhood has had tear downs with new houses built much closer to my home, that loom larger than what the City has approved for The Waters project. I do not want to minimize the neighbor's concerns, but rather to acknowledge the respect with which those concerns have been accorded in the planning and the re- working of this project. The location near freeway access, the fire station and the park is perfect for a facility of this type as the planning commission and Council recognized when they gave their preliminary approval. If approved, The Waters will be a beautiful asset to the Countryside Neighborhood and all of Edina. I encourage you, and the City Council to approve this project in keeping with quality development in our city and in response to current and future needs of our residents. Sincerely, 'Don Henrich 4113 W. 45th St. Edina, MN 55424 NOTICES: CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error; please notify us immediately by e-mail, discard any paper copies and delete all electronic files of the message. TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, except as expressly provided to the contrary, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. CQ� ' LA�SO1 -� CN-O . , `tom c� Cf5f OL,� cK 0 r D � 5124 Skyline Drive Edina, MN 55436 3une 21, 2010 TO: Michael Fischer 4512 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 Dear Mc Fischer, . We write as 15 year residents of Edina and as members of Colonial Church. We siro'ngly support the eland use,change so as•to permit the building of senior citizen housing adjacent to the' church and fire station. We have carefully considered the arguments, pro and, con, about this development. It is clear #4 pLrmrthng constriction of a senior citizen residence on this site is a sensible and constructive use of the site There are few sites in Edina which are fardw away from single unit housing then this location. Basically, the building will affect only the church, a fire stabo Gan a limited extent a park. Also, the access to the site is primarily via the secondary route is via Tracy, which is a standard driving route to the high school, several churches, etc.. The people who oppose the development, especially after the changes in height and number of units, do not have valid ,grounds to support their opposition. Thank you for your consideration of our opinion. � r IF � N.Bergfalk 1/ / Jackie Hoogenakker From: Bruce Artmann <96shadowrider @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 2:09 PM To: Lynette Biunno; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Rezoning for Colonial Church development Please forward this email to the Mayor, all members of the City Council, all members of the Planning Board and any other city employees involved in this process. If this request is improper by your rules, please tell me what I need to do to let these people know about my concerns. Thanks My name is Bruce Artmann. My wife, Cheryl, and I have lived at 6117 Tracy Ave since October, 1985. I was a Paid -on -Call member of the Edina Fire Department for over 14 years. My wife and I have discussed this project since it was first proposed. We even made some calls about moving my mother into it. I will see the new development from my front yard and possibly out my front window. Nothing I've seen or read about causes me any concerns. I was even okay with the initial proposal. I see it as an improvement to our neighborhood. I don't believe it will cause me any significant traffic problems since it is located right off the freeway. The traffic on Tracy is most congested before and after the high school is in session. Since the people who will be living at the new complex will be retired, I don't see them adding much to the traffic flow. My wife and I want to voice our support for this project and strongly urge you to approve it. Thank you Jeffrey and Suzanne Pope 6621 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 .Mr. Stephen Brown Chair, Planning Commission City of Edina 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dar Mr. Brown: - 17r LIU�_ � June 4, 2010 As residents. of Edina —and people who want to live in Edina for many years to come - -we strongly urge you to SUPPORT The Waters Senior.Living Center at Colonial Church. We are both approaching age 70, and it is becoming more difficult to live in our single family home in Edina. The Waters looks like the perfect place for us to stay in Edina when we leave our home. We've followed the objections to this development raised by some of the people in Countryside. It appears that Colonial has done a sincere and reasonable job of Listening to the neighbors and responding to their concerns. We've seen the revised drawings — including the trees and landscaping. The revised plans and drawings show the project to fit remarkably Well into the neighborhood and be much less visible than the most vocal neighbors portray. Edina needs a facility like The Waters. There is nothing else like it in Edina. We've had parents at other facilities in Edina, and we've visited friends elsewhere. None of the existing senior citizen- facilities represent places we'd want to live. As things now stand, if The Waters isn't built, we'll - surely move out of Edina when we sell our home. As prospective tenants, we want a future home with the amenities and environment that would be provided by The Waters. Many others in our age range feel the same way. Please give your support to The Waters and make it a much- needed reality for Edina. Sincerely, X anne Pope Bill &'BaYbara Beard 4606 Sunnyside Road Edina, MN 55424 June 9, 2010 Mr. Michael Fischer Planning Commission Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Dear Mr. F eer. icA:�,vA top@ 12 I *--`V%NO � I just wanted to drop you a brief note to ask you for your support for the Waters Senior Living of Edina project. As former members of Colonial Church, we participated in the early stages of the process, 3 years ago, that Colonial engaged in to determine how best to utilize this wonderful site. We have watched this process from afar, these past years, and have been very impressed with how Colonial approached this project by first engaging the community, building around their ideas and then seeking out community feedback both for and against the project. We have had the opportunity to review the "Resubmission Packet" that will be before you shortly and find it to be a wonderful project that -is better for having ground through the community engagement process. Although we all know that this project isn't without controversy, and suspect that there are those who still take issue with the project, we believe this project will be a great addition to the community, a project that is consistent with and reflects the values of Edina, meets significant community needs, is consistent with Edina's Comp Plan and produces the lowest neighborhood impact of any possible project. We respectfully request your support for this wonderful project. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. Respectfully submitted, Bill i arbara Beard billb(ZOeardgroupinc. com (952) 457.3405 Mobile _ VD D Mr. Steve Brown Chairman of Edina Planning commission, Dear Mr. Brown, 6/15/10 I wanted to drop you note to express my support for the The Waters Senior Living of Edina, building project to that is being proposed to be built adjacent to Colonial Church of Edina. I am a life long member of the Church and was with the Church when we moved from the 56th and Wooddale Ave. location to our current location. We had received a lot of concern from the neighborhood then before we built the new Church, and many of the concerns are the same then as they are now (size of the building, site lines, house values etc.). We have strived to be good neighbors and a positive force in the community. We listened to the legitimate concerns of the neighborhood and the concerns The Mayor and the City Council noted when the proposal was brought before you and the City Council. Changes have been made to the design and scope of the project that address these concerns and hopefully you and the City Council will agree and allow this project to continue. I believe it will prove worthy to the community, to the seniors who will live there, and yes, the neighborhood. Similar, to the overall benefits the Church has added to the community and the neighborhood over the last 30 plus years. On a more personal note, my step mother, who lives in Edina in the condominiums off of Brookside and 44th street, is starting to consider possible alternative living situations. Betty has lived independently since my father's death and loves living in Edina and our community. She attends Colonial Church and would like to as long as she is able. Betty is in her mid 80's and thankfully in wonderful health. But she is a realist and knows she may not always be able to live on her own as she likes. A living environment like the one at the proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina is the perfect situation of graduated assistance as she needs it coupled with a love of our city and closeness to the Church that she attends. She can only hope that the project will be finished and ready to move in before she needs to move out of a completely independent living environment. Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, Paul Cavanor TO: Jim Hovland, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Edina, MN 55424 FROM: Jim and Susan Eaton SUBJECT: Water Senior Housing Development DATE: June 14th, 2010 Dear Mayor Hovland: WD '-iJ� While my wife and I are not residents of Edina, living in the Lake.Harriet area of Minneapolis, we want to document. our support and enthusiasm for the Waters Senior Housing Project. As we seriously consider living options for the next stage of our lives (we are 69 and 66) the kind of facility that the Waters development offers is very appealing. The project's sensitivity to the southwest metro area demographic from an environmental, location and program offerings, makes it an attractive fit for our near future needs and priority interests. We know that some Edina residents who are opposed to the project see Waters as an infringement on their neighborhood. However, we also know that the Colonial Church leadership and project developers have gone through and exhaustive process of guaranteeing the facility meets and /or exceeds every zoning and related criteria established by the city of Edina. As you go forward with your final decision process we hope and trust you will take our endorsement of the Waters as another piece of rationale for your approval to add the Waters Senior Center, and its amenities, to the impressive list of Edina community assets. Si rely, �&,� Ji and Susan Eaton 41 Dupont Ave. South inneapolis, MN 55409 (612)310 -4241 f cc. 'teve Brown, Edina Planning Commission Chairman Jackie Hoogenakker From: Cary Teague Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:12 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Support for The Waters Project Please add to the emails ... unless you have already received this one... From: Jeffrey D. Carpenter [ mailto :jcarpenter @hensonefron.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:43 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Support for The Waters Project Cary, I am forwarding the email below for general distribution consistent with how the City is handling all other email communications on this project. Jeffrey D. Carpenter Henson & Efron, P.A. 220 South Sixth Street, Suite 1800 Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4503 Office: 612 -252 -2862 Cell: 612 - 730 -1420 Fax: 612- 339 -6364 Email: icarpenter @hensonefron.com Bio: http://www.hensonefron.com/attorneys/bio.asp?lastname=carpente[ >>> On 6/22/2010 at 9:11 PM, Don Henrich <uechenrich @yahoo.com> wrote: June 22, 2010 Jeffrey D. Carpenter icarpenter@hensonefron.com Dear Jeffrey, I am writing in support of "The Waters" Senior Living Center, proposed to be built on property of Colonial Church (of which I am a member). The neighbors and others have voiced concerns about this project's size and possible changes in traffic in the area. Knowing this the developers have met with and listened to these concerns and made changes in the designs to alleviate these concerns. I have been impressed by their willingness to reduce the height of the building and respond to other desires of the Countryside neighborhood. The developers responsiveness and desire to work with the neighborhood shows that The Waters will be a good neighbor in our community. Marco Div���ev� Ar" Xte, C yr 6 MARK AND LINDA NYVALL 1439 ALPINE PASS MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 753.377.4534 June 12, 2010 Mayor James Hovland Members of the City Council City of Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 RECt... rox 1 solo 19C120162 W J Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council: We are writing to express our enthusiastic support for the proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina. We have been members of Colonial Church for over twenty years, involved in leadership in the church in many areas of ministry and committed financial supporters. Our children grew up at Colonial and our daughter recently was married there. We are thrilled about the possibilities for ministry to seniors offered by this wonderful project. The development of this facility has been careful and deliberate, and it is wholeheartedly supported by a majority of the church's membership. Many of Colonial's members are looking forward to moving into the beautiful new apartments proposed. Members of our own immediate family have expressed interest in this new facility. They are lifelong residents of Edina, married over fifty years, who are in their 70's and are well known and respected as involved members of the Edina community. Their children and grandchildren live in Edina, they have never lived anywhere else, and they have no desire to move outside of the community. They believe The Waters Senior Living of Edina will offer them the high quality amenities they desire in their retirement home. We have attended all of the meetings associated with the proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina, including the first round of Planning Commission and City Council meetings. We have been saddened and dismayed by the accusations of some neighbors, when we know that the church task force working on the project has taken the utmost care to exercise proper diligence. The task force has listened respectfully to neighbors' concerns and has made significant modifications to the design in response. Now it is our hope that we can move forward on a project that promises great benefit to the Edina community for years to come. We urge you to vote for approval of this project. Sincerely, Ma-kl a*i& L 6*ida Nyva& Mr. Michael Fischer Planning Commission Chair Edina City Offices 4801 W. 50'' St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Fischer, NOR :41E� i My wife and I are writing you on behalf of The Waters Senior Living Center proposal which is currently before you. We have already submitted our names as potential residents of this facility. As members of Colonial Church of Edina for 30 years, we are excited about the possibility of living in close proximity to our church. The "Waters" would provide us with the opportunity to age in place. A survey shows that more than 10,000 Edina residents are over 65 years of age. There is obviously a need for more facilities of this kind which will provide much needed housing housing to the growing number of senior citizens. We've attended meetings at Colonial attended by members of the surrounding community, hearing their concerns. We believe that these concerns have been addressed, and we know that adjustments have been made in the building plans to mitigate those concerns. Any further downsizing of the proposed structure would jeopardize the viability of the project in every way. We strongly encourage you to approve The Waters Senior Living Center. It is 800 feet from the closest single family homes on Olinger Blvd. It is the ideal location for this type of special use. It's proximity to, and tangential connection to the Church should foster community building and intergenerational connections and outreach. Very few senior housing facilities have this benefit. Cordially, Paul and Dr. Grace Ramseyer 952- 936 -9860 peramseyer@nwc.edu H.}l..c� Co�Uu,1s -� C uwC G�•� �.�c/ Al;,�r will 4 CIA f `4 <`p U `13� ®-� 9�-elc � s'tc �c..� D`7��i 6i QGc�I s`T.� v.,c✓,adHGG,`�� -crl a %�kl aN 064.e�, 6 �c 4r,-z- med Clyde O. Hanson 6240 Oriole Lane Edina, MN 55436 y'j-(W925 -3159 r J 6 P " r '7 G6��t4wd D �� 2836 Mayfield Road D ' - - Wayzata, MN 55391 June 13, 2010 Steve Brown, Planning Commission Chair Edina City Hall 4811 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Waters Senior Living of Edina Dear Chairman Brown, Although I live in Minnetonka, I travel to Edina several times a week to attend church at Colonial and participate in many programs and activities there. Edina has become like a second "home base" to me, and I frequent many stores and shops there in conjunction with my trips to Colonial. My husband and I are excited about the Waters Senior Living facility and have signed up to live there in the future. We are retired, and we like the idea of someday moving close to our church and friends in Edina. I deliver Meals on Wheels in Edina, from the United Methodist Church of Peace on Xerxes. Much of the senior housing that I visit off Xerxes and York Avenue is older now, without many of the amenities that seniors now desire. That is why this new facility is so appealing to us. The reality that this property backs up to Highway 62 and is located next to a fire station limits how it can be developed. I think the changes made to the facility have resulted in a very attractive complex. The design of the buildings flow into the Colonial campus in a very appealing way which we feel will be positive addition to the neighborhood. Just as the Colonial Church campus is now considered to be a real asset to the neighborhood, I believe this development will come to be viewed in the same way by the neighbors. Please vote yes to this development at your June 30th meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, Judy WaeschIe cc Jim Hovland, mayor of Edina Ted Yoch, Colonial task force chair --7 7 f- June 8 2010 Dear Planning Commission Chair Brown, My name is Jeff Scott, and I am a long time member of Colonial Church of Edina. I am writing in support of the Waters Senior Housing project being developed by Shelter Corporation on Colonial property behind the Fire Station at Tracy and the Crosstown. As a deacon at Colonial church, who visits seniors each month for the church, I think I can provide a little different perspective on this project. This project is very similar to The Colony, also developed by Shelter Corporation, near the Eden Prairie Center. It is first class in design and amenities, and is a graduated care facility. It is very much like the Friendship Village complex in Bloomington ... and both of these facilities have many Colonial members. When I visit these people, regardless of their health, they can't say enough good things about the facility and the care they receive. They have real peace of mind, because as their health deteriorates they know that they will receive the appropriate care, and will not be forced to move. They also appreciate the area they live in, because it is very close to where they used to live ... which is comforting. From the standpoint of Edina this seems like a win -win situation. With over 20% of your population over 65 years of age the need for such a facility ... right near where they currently live ... seems to be great. In addition, it will be first class ...with lots of amenities ... something your constituents will be looking for. With the graduated care feature couples will be especially interested, for as one person declines the other person could still live independently in the same facility while their spouse got extended care. My parents had this situation in Florida when they had to move out of a gated community on a golf course when my stepfather's health started to slowly go down hill. Living 1500 miles away you don't know how good it made me feel to know that they would only need to move once, and that my mom and her husband would get good care and have a nice place to live for the rest of their life ... regardless of what happened to either of them. Practically speaking, for a city with an aging population, as seniors move into Waters that opens up homes for younger families. To maintain high quality schools you need an ongoing supply of kids ... and this could really help that situation down the road. Colonial has been a very good neighbor, holding over 15 hours of "listening sessions" with a very spirited group of neighbors. Based on those sessions the building has been scaled down to three stories from the original four. The number of units has been reduced from 150 to 139 ... and the roof design has been modified to look more residential. Additional landscaping and trees have also been added. I really feel that the Waters Senior Housing Community will be a real plus for Edina, and I hope that you encourage the Planning Commission to support it. Sincerely, N('' Jeff Scott June 6, 2010 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, ;:RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2010 We are writing in support of The Waters Senior Housing Community on the campus of Colonial Church. We are both 1971 graduates. of Edina High Schad currently Bloomington residents. We would strongly consider this facility in the future. For the immediate future one set of parents will be moving back to Minnesota from Wisconsin and are interested in this community having lived not-&r awar on Creep Drive for ZG years in the 60s and 70s. The idea of having housing that will adapt to our needs and our parents needs as we age is very comforting. The area is lovely and having Colonial Church right there is wonderful. Please approve the building of The Waters Senior Living Center. Anne and David Westman 10712 Garden Circle, Bloomington, MN 952 - 941 -2779 westmom @earthlinknet CHARLES INGWALSON 7408 Cahill Rd. Edina, MN. 55439 952 922 -8652 June 13, 2010 Stephen Brown, Chairman Edina Planning Commission City of Edina 4801 W. 5& Street Edina, MN. 55424 -1330 RE: The Waters Senior Living Of Edina Dear Chairman Brown; This letter is to register my support for the Waters Senior Living Of Edina project now being proposed at Tracy and the Crosstown. There are two primary reasons for my enthusiastic support of this project. First, as a long time resident of Edina, my wife and I like the idea of having a number of living choices within the community from which to select as we age. We lived for 31 years in the Country Club area and, when we sold our home there, we found it was very difficult to think about living in another community. Consequently, we purchased our current townhome here on Cahill. Several years hence, The Waters could very likely provide us with an attractive choice for our next home. It would certainly provide a more attractive alternative to the City's current housing stock of senior living projects. Second, I struggle to visualize a more appropriate development choice for that piece of land. It conforms to all of the City's development parameters, requires no variances and has virtually no negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. As a long time member of the Edina Planning Commission, I always welcomed the opportunity vote to approve developments of this type that were such a positive addition to the community in every respect. I encourage you to vote to approve this project as a wonderful addition to Edina. Sincerely. Chuck Ingwalson .cc. James B. Hovland, Mayor r/ GaD ?tX4.4, ca�' VVI-AA-fil-l-A r2 O)o Pl- Lped, . � F D?� -fit 70 f� Lou- Ld 3 --FU Mayor Jim Hovland Planning Commisioner Steve Brown Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jim and Steve: N My wife and I have been Edina homeowners for more than 25 years. As senior citizens who wish to continue to live in Edina, we are excited about the proposed Waters Senior Center to be built behind the fire station. We downsized 15 years ago, selling our Edina home, and moved to the condo building at 50th and Halifax. Our next move would be to Friendship Village or The Colony, thereby leaving Edina, which is our home and where we wish to remain. The Waters Center has all the care facilities, nursing, memory, etc. that we will need in the coming years. It has an affordable price that allows us to stay as residents of Edina. We even put our names on a waiting list to be able to move there. Our understanding is that the building plan has been modified to meet the concerns of local neighbors and the new plan looks good to us. We heartily endorse this new senior center and ask the City of Edina to_approve it. Ron and Carole Dobies 5000 Halifax Ave South #307 Edina, MN 55424 7,0,0 GOETZ & ECKLAND P•A. June 10, 2010 Jeffrey D. Carpenter 6705 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 Dear Jeff: How are you? I hope you are doing well. CIVIL LITIGATION • CRIMINAL DE.FE.I \SE I am a member of Colonial Church. I write to request that the Edina Planning Commission approve the plans for. the Waters Senior Living Center. By now, I am sure you have heard all possible pro's and con's of building this facility. The Countryside neighborhood residents have been vocal in outlining their concerns. While the majority of these have been sincere, some have been mean- spirited and I hate that our church has had to respond in that context. I am proud of Ted Yoch and the other members of the committee for their patient and professional approach. For me personally, I can imagine no better use for this Colonial asset than to build a residence for seniors. The location will allow Edina residents to stay near their own neighborhoods, families and friends, as they get older and are unable to care for themselves completely. I wish my mother and father had had a similar residence nearby. Moreover, I look forward to the opportunity to sign up myself and my kids to assist at the facility. What better way to teach the kids about putting feet to what they learn next door at Colonial? Finally, I can't imagine a better place in Edina for this facility to be located. It will literally be surrounded by the fire station, Crosstown 62, Colonial Church, and a rarely used hockey rink in the Countryside Park. It should not intrude on anyone's enjoyment of the community. Jeff, thank you for listening and seriously considering this matter. If you have any questions or would like to discuss any particular issue, please give me a call. With kindest regards, GOETZ & ECKLAND P.A. �0 DCE /mjs cc: Mayor James B. Hovland Stephen Brown Deborah Causey Eckland EXPOsnio-, ]-TALL AT RnERPLACE PHONE 612- 8741552 43 MAIN STREET S.E., SUITE 505 FAx 612- 331 -2473 MI \XEAPOLIS, MN 55414 N,NNr%l,.GOETZECKLA_',MLSw.COM CIVjI, Ij,jj(;A'Ij()N • CRIMINAL DER-24SI", • I-IMPLA)YMFNT COUNSEIING L"XIIOSITION HAII, AT RIVEA1111ACE 43 MAIN S•ntrKrS.&,Surn--,505 MINNEAPOLIS, MN55414 Jeffrey D. Carpenter 6705 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 "Ies Posp ----=VPITNgY BOWES 02 • 1 P $000.440 0004408778 JUN 10 2010 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55414 Z.q D CFO OD I f' Stephen & Linda Richardson stevehrichardsonna hotmail.com 612 - 616 -4945 7068 Cahill Road Edina, MN 55439 Edina Planning Commissioner Jeffrey D. Carpenter 6705 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 Re: The Waters Development on Colonial Way, Edina, MN Commissioner Carpenter, I am writing; for my wife Linda and myself, as concerned homeowners in Edina. In addition, for background, I was born and raised in Edina, attended Edina Public Schools, was a member of Ken Rosland's Edinayouth Advisory Board in the 60's, purchased a home in Edina in 1983 and raised our three children We currently own our second home in Edina. Both Linda and I are approaching the age where senior housing alternatives will be a consideration. We are, second generation, life long Edina residents and want nothing but the best for our community. My father, Neil L. Richardson, owned homes in Edina from 1946 —1983 and then rented an Edina Apartment until 1993. Neil was instrumental in starting Little League Baseball in Edina. His children all attended Edina Schools, graduating in 61, 63 & 69. Neil, upon finding he needed assisted living in 1993, researched alternatives and could not find anything to meet his needs in Edina. After 50 years as an Edina resident, Neil moved to Friendship Village in Bloomington in 1993. Regrettably, he died there, very comfortably and well cared for, in 1995. I am writing in support of the Waters Development being proposed on Colonial Way in west Edina. For the following reasons this facility is needed and should be approved as proposed: • The project has met or exceeded all city requirements. • The project has admirably adjusted to the concerns of an ill- advised and ill- informed neighborhood group, making changes that, while unnecessary, respond well to concerns expressed. • This facility is needed in Edina to meet the needs of our aging population. Edina is the oldest (average age of resident) suburb in the Twin Cities and the need/demand for progressive living arrangements for older citizens, in their own community, is only going to increase. • The location of the proposed Waters development is ideal, buffered by the Hwy 62 /Crosstown corridor to the South, the Edina Fire Station to the East, the large Edina Park to the North and by Colonial Church, a sponsoring and involved organization, to the West. It's impact on the immediate neighborhood is reasonably expected to be generally positive. It is very reasonably stated that this is the highest and best use for this property! • Finally, in our representative form of government, while special interests should be heard and considered, our elected representatives are bound to consider the merits of a project, when considered within the appropriate rules and regulations, in accord with the interests of the broad constituency of the community. This project will be good for Edina! Thank you for your service to our community and your careful, thoughtful consideration of the Waters project. Sincerely, 6, e r Ste he & Linda is dson Mr•Scephen H'Richazdson i TM:.'70G�CahillRd ` - Minneapolis MN:55439 0 FAME �11554, 20.20x. P-114 7-T �N 61,PW5 '•J S 4'...'•K.i.".ir Zr .L •�. l ��,l ��l.►.+„ �,;:1p�1�:i'�:la„�,.11�;1�';;,� I).,,11.�11, ��,i,l��E,l�l Jackie Hoo enakker From: tedspringer @aol.com Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 7:57 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Steve.Brown @northmarq.com Subject: The Waters complex Hi guys... Just a note to convey my belief that The Waters is a much needed and valuable addition to our Edina community. I have written my thoughts to Mayor Hovland and copied the council members, but I wanted you, too, to know how deeply I feel about this. Having raised our family in Edina with our kids going to Countryside School and rowboating in the pond that was to become part of the Colonial Church property (we are not members of the church), I feel a part of the community. We have lived in Countryside for over 45 years. It is truly disturbing to me that the community I have lived in for decades, and no doubt much longer than those now protesting (we now live in Nine Mile Village) have decided that the The Waters facility, and potentially we ourselves, are not welcome. Nancy and I have loved living here and want to continue to do so. While there is a vociferous outcry by some neighbors, I believe those of us older futzes who are very much for the development, would handily outnumber the opposition. We are not as.vocal, certainly, and we are not organized as a pro - Waters movement, and we are not as strident, but there are many of us, MANY. And we want to. remain in Edina, in this neighborhood. We applaud your work and that of the developers to accommodate the opposition's suggestions. The structure will be handsome and the foliage very effective in protecting the privacy of the complex. In short, I think you are doing the right thing for the community, and I look forward to continuing to be an Edina citizen. Sincerely, Ted and Nancy Springer 6300 Pheasant Ct. 952 929 4526 Susan Howl Subject: FK Senior Care Center /Coolonial Church RECEIVED - - - -- original Message - - - -- MAY 161010 From: Dick Doyle [mailto:rfdmn @earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 12:27 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Senior Care Center /Coolonial Church To: James B. Hoveland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot A. Housh, Ann Swenson I am writing with regard to the Senior Care Center planned to occupy land adjoining Colonial Church. While there seems to be much opposition to this, exhibited by numerous yellow signs, I would like to speak emphatically in favor of the project! I believe such a facility is needed and would be a valuable asset to our community. I reviewed the initial broadcast citing concerns, but didn't feel any had real validity. Many items would be, or already have been, considered by the Planning Commission (except perhaps who would use the pool since seniors don't like to swim). - In any case, I do agree with the opposition that Edina is a fine place to live. I have lived here for forty four years, currently reside in Nine Mile Village, and have witnessed many positive changes that have kept Edina in the forefront. As in the past, I am confident that the Planning Commission and the City Council will be governed by any change that would be best for our community. In spite of noisy meetings and ugly yellow signs, it is my belief that the opposition is speaking for a minority, a minority simply resistant to change. Thank you for your consideration. Richard Doyle 6308 Falcon Court Edina, MN 55436 952- 926 -6798 1 Jackie H000enakker From: Dick Doyle <rfdmn @earthlink.net> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 1:43 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Senior Convalescent Home TO: City of Edina Planning Department I. am responding to the Public Hearing Notice of 6 /18/10 regarding Subject. I am very-much in favor of this project and feel itWill`be an asset'to our community. I have reviewed the list of concerns by those opposed, and can't imagine why they are concerned: I can't see anything that Would be detrimental to our area. 'On the contrary, I believe Edina needs accomodations such as this for seniors needing such services. Why should seniors needing elder care find it necessary to leave Edina after spending the better part of their lives living here? What does that say about Edina? (Next picture. Senior Home is erected. Yellow signs replaced by. red ones saying, "Save our Senior Home from non Edina residents ".) I have previously communicated my views to the Mayor and City Council, and am confident the Planning Commission and the City Council will act in the best interest of our City and Community. Thank you for your consideration. Richard Doyle 6308 Falcon Court Edina, MN 55436 952 - 926 -6798 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: donnahl2 @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 2:18 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Colonial Church of Edina Senior Center live in a townhouse in Nine Mile Village. I've seen all the signs about protecting the neighborhood. And frankly I don't understand all the fuss. Edina is a community with a lot of older citizens. We need to take care of the elderly when they can no longer stay in their homes. People who have lived here and supported the community for many years want to stay here. The proposed building sounds wonderful. It doesn't appear that it will even be visible to the neighbors. Change is scary for people. But this is a community that needs to support all its citizens young and old. I am fully in favor of this new senior building. Donna Hunt i David D. Murphy 4701 Annaway Drive Edina, Minnesota 55436 Dear Edina Planning Commission members, I write to endorse the approval of the Waters Senior Living proposal that will soon come before the Council. I grew up in Edina, raised my family in Edina and now live as an empty nester with my wife in Edina. I consider such a development a very worthy part of Edina's future. My support is based on rationale for the good of Edina as a whole with consideration of the nearby community. Edina needs more senior housing. Our family loves our town; in fact two of my three grown children still live in Minneapolis and hope to live in Edina someday (when they can afford to). They have also expressed their support for the development. My mother, an 85 year old widow, has expressed her desire to live in the Waters should it be approved. A wide spectrum of housing options is good for the city. When seniors move to The Waters, their homes will be available for young families like my adult children. Our tax base grows and new blood comes to Edina. I understand that the building is carefully designed to enhance the local neighborhood. The building is only three stories tall and 139 units. The design includes attractive architectural features that will make the residents proud to live there and enhance the community. I know that the church has been a wonderful part of the local neighborhood for many years and an attractive addition to the Countryside community. I am confident that this extension of the Colonial village will be just as positive an addition to the area. Few Edina residents could argue that Colonial has not been a wonderful addition to our city. From the information I have learned, it sounds like the planning for this development has been thoughtful and within the planning guidelines of the city. I hope the Council approves The Waters plan. Thank you. SinrPrPIv- Lavin L�. IVIUINIIy Q�1�o�0 Dear Edina Planning Commission members, I write to endorse the approval of the Waters Senior Living proposal that will soon come before the Council. As a sixty year resident of Edina and a senior of some 85 years (would you believe it ?), I consider such a development a very worthy part of Edina's future. My support is based on rationale for the good of Edina and for the good of seniors such as me. I understand that the building is carefully designed to enhance the local neighborhood. The building is only three stories tall and 139 units. (I hope I will be able to retain a space). The design includes , attractive architectural features that will make the residents proud to live there and enhance the community. - Edina needs more senior housing. I hope to spend my "autumn years" in the wonderful city my late husband (Harry) and I lived and raised our three children in for so many years. Our family loves our town; in fact two of my three grown children still live in Edina. They have also expressed their support for the development. How wonderful it would be for my children, grandchildren and great grandchildren to visit me in The Waters near where I have lived for so many years. When the day comes that I will move from my current individual home to senior housing, my home will become an affordable option for a younger family or adult in housing transition as I was some nine years ago. A wide spectrum of housing options is good for the city. While I am not a member of Colonial Church, I know that the church has been a wonderful part of the local neighborhood for many years and an attractive addition to the Countryside community. I am confident that this extension of the Colonial village will be just as positive an addition to the area. Let me close by saying that as an 85 year old resident of Edina, I have been concerned these past few years about where I will spend my later years. Many of my friends and I discuss our plans (or lack of them) often. The Waters is where I hope to be. My friends have told me they feel the same way. I hope the Council approves The Waters plan. Thank you. //Sincerely, � 0 Betty D. Murphy Y-V o V. Steve Brown Edina, Minnesota Dear Sir, I am writing in support of the Waters Senior Living of Edina Project. As a member of Colonial Church, I have been following the developments and sincerely believe that this project will be an asset to the city. It is a well designed plan, and has taken into consideration many of the suggestions of the neighbors. The plan has the senior housing reduced from four stories to three stories, and the number of units has been reduced from 150 units to 139 units. Also the front of the building has been redesigned to include more architectural features. — - This project will meet the increased demand of the community for more housing for seniors. I've been told that more than 10,000 Edina residents are older than age 65. A large number of them will eventually need assisted living and memory care. Also, having experienced the devastating effects of memory loss in my father, and our efforts to find good housing for him, we are hopeful that when we might need senior housing, the Waters Senior Living of Edina Project will be available for us. When that time comes, we would hope to be able to live near our family and the Colonial Church community. Due to the existing large trees and vegetation, the view of this building will be partially blocked- in a love }y way. The trees will provide a green buffer to the senior housing. For most of the year, the building will scarcely be seen through the trees. I cannot imagine a building complex like this being built anywhere else that could be nestled into the land in such a natural way. These are just a few of the reasons why I support the Waters Senior Housing of Edina. Sincerely, Penelope Anderson ono �� 4 i o"M / We r- r I r I I r r / ♦ I rf.- � June 13, 2010 Edina City Council Edina City Planning Commission 4801 West 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council and Planning Commission members, We are writing this letter in SUPPORT of the proposed Waters Senior Living Community. As former 25 year residents of Edina we are absolutely astounded by the controversy this project is creating. My wife and I walk the Bredeson Park area frequently and have driven Olinger and Jeff Place and do not understand any of the visual objections. to the planned location —the Waters simply will not be visible in the neighborhood! As we approach, the age when we will seriously consider this type of living arrangement, we -are not aware of any ,satisfactory options that would bring us back to Edina. We believe Edina needs this type of development. Our best senior living options at this point are located in Eden Prairie and Bloomington. This would be an exception opportunity to retain current residents, and bring back former residents to Edina. We urge you to quickly approve this project! Sincerely, Max & Judy Hill PS: We do not attend Colonial Church - :Susan Howl F Subject: FW: senior housing RECEIVED JUN 0 J 2010 From: R P CLEMMER [mailto:rpciemmer@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Steve.Brown @northmarq.com Subject: senior housing We are writing in support of "the Waters" senior housing proposal. We are members of Colonial Church and are excited about the plans for senior housing on the land between the church and the fire station. Several people we know have expressed interest in living there in the future. We feel that there wil be many other seniors in Edina that will find this an attactive alternative. We've looked at pictures of the building, which we think will add character to the neighborhood. With all the trees and other buildings, it will not be very visible to the neighborhood; but the times and places it will be seen, we think it will be pleasant to look at. This is a great location for senior living, less. than a block from the Crosstown, which w. take most of the traffic. The traffic impact on the neighborhood would be minimal. Dick and Pat Clemmer ,;:z-Ron Randall 5565 West 70th Street Edina, MN 55439 June 7,2010 The Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50h Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Council Members: RECEIVED JUN 092010 I have resided at this address since August 2000 and have been a member of Colonial Church since 1970. At the time that our church signed the contract with Shelter Corporation I was the President of our Church Foundation as as such was the person to sign for Colonial. So, am intimately familiar with the project and with the process that has been ongoing. In an earlier e-mail to my neighbor Jim Hovland I stressed the great hope we at Colonial hold for this new senior housing project. Edina has nothing of this quality to offer at this time and a bonus feature is the expected inclusion of a number of low income housing units in the center. The land was lying unused and off the city tax rolls. Now it will be very usefully occupied and there will be tax income for Edina. I attended all of the "listening" sessions that were held at Colonial Church for the benefit of the neighbors. My characterization of those sessions was "grandstanding" and "venting" on the part of the neighborhood association. In my mind there was not a single legitimate concern voiced by these neighbors. I don't believe that there is a single neighbor who will have more than an obscured view of any part of the project yet there was ranting about how the scope of the project would change the character of the neighborhood. This is the same message that the same group delivered in the 1970s when the original plans for Colonial Church were presented. The two ring leaders of the neighborhood group are even the same two individuals who were so vocal at that time. At the time that the church was built the neighborhood group managed to force the church to spend $100.,,000 plus to build birms.,along Olinger Boulevard. A few years later .the same association appr`oachod the church complaining that the birms blocked their view of the church. Now the group seems to be succeeding in reducing the scope of a very carefully designed structure under the premise that it will be obstructing their view. Unfortunately, reducing the number of units will reduce the capacity of the facility and will mean less tax revenue for Edina and certainly fewer low income units in the building. It will also be difficult to justify the same level of amenities in a smaller project. won't even dignify the remarks about nine foot ceilings and granite countertops by commenting on their inappropriateness, also, the suggestion that The Rivers management should post a bond against the cost of possible search and rescue operations in case an elderly resident "escapes" from the facility. After the last inflammatory letter to the Church from the association's attomey (in which he suggested that the significant appeasing modifications to the plan which have been offered were inadequate) I I. wrote an e-mail to Ted Yoch, who has poured the better part of the last three years into this work. I told Ted that if I were in his shoes I would go back to the original plan and ask the Council to approve it as originally presented. It makes more sense in the original format and would be better for the community and for Colonial Church. Thank you for taking time to read this letter. It is my personal opportunity to do a little "venting ". Sincerely, Ron Randall RECEIVED June 5, 2010 JUN 0 9 2010 Mayor Hovlund and. City Council City. Hall 4801 West 50'' Street. Edina, MN, 55436 Mr. Mayor If you have ever had to take the car key's away from your parents forever, you know what a traumatic experience that can be. You are in effect causing them to be quite isolated in their home without the prospect of that changing. My wife and I started by looking for a care facility for her parents in their home town 100 miles NW. of here and found that the waiting lists were one year out We needed a facility closer to our home in Edina and we needed it fairly soon. We found space at St. Teresa in Hopkins, but they are not Catholic and felt somewhat like outsiders- When space was available some months later at the Edenbourough complex we moved them there. They eventually got to the point that they needed full time nursing care and we had to move them again. We certainly would have appreciated having an assisted living facility within two miles of our house and with a church that they could have felt a closer affiliation with. I understand that you have a responsibility to weigh various community interests, and make_ the best decision for the community as a whole. The proposed facility on the site near: Colonial Church seems.to us to be an appropriate use for the land. It's too late for our parents, but I am sure there are other residents of our community that would very much value and appreciate such a facility. As forty -two year residents of Edina we will probably be candidates for such a residence a few years down the road ourselves. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. e / Robert and Susan Shulze 6800 Paiute Drive Edina, Minn 55439 RECEIVED JUN 0 7 2010 0 Erg i' i Susan Howl From: Sent: Cc: Subject: Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 www. citvofedi na. com Lynette Biunno Monday, June 07, 2010 8:43 AM Susan Howl FW: Waters Senior Housing From: LARRY VENABLE [mailto:larryvenable @msn.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 6:29 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Housing To Edina City Council: RECEIVED JUN 0 7 2010 I have recently become aware of the Water's Senior Housing project near Colonial Church. I am writing to urge the council to approve the project if not already. I am 77, have had residence in Edina for 43 years, my three children graduated from Edina High School. Currently I spend winters in Florida, but maintain my condo at Windwood of Edina. I was a member at Colonial Church for many years, have attended the Friday morning renewal meetings there since 1983. My point is that I have many friends in the approximate age group that would be candidates for the Waters, and it would be an ideal place for me as I plan my future. As I get older, and my health starts to deteriorate, I do not plan to live in Florida and will return to Minnesota full time because all of my children and grandchildren are Minnesota residents. Please approve this project. Thanks for listening. Lawrence Venable 7500 Cahill Road, #223C Edina, MN 55439 Susan_ Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Living' Center RECEIVED JUN 0 7 2010 From: Don Klassy [mailto:dfkmlkSS @msn.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 5:08 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Living Center Mayor Jim Hovland, City of Edina Planning Commission Chair, Steve Brown, City of Edina Dear Sirs: Wanted to take just a few minutes to contact you and urge your support of the Waters Senior Living Center in Edina. We are both long -time members of Colonial Church and live in Minnetonka. We are looking forward to the Waters project being constructed in Edina, and fealize there is an expectation that we can spend our senior years in The Waters. This facility will provide a great opportunity to attract a large network of volunteers from Colonial Church to assist in the daily operation of The Waters. Based upon the demographics of which we are aware, there is a great need in Edina for this type of senior housing, and again we urge you to approve the project. Sincerely, Donald F. and Mary Lou Klassy, Colonial Members since 1985 i Susan Howl RECEIVED APR 2 ? 29;0 Subject: The Waters Please vote for The Waters. Edina residents are aging and they have to go to Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, and Chanhassen when they need assisted living, although they would prefer Edina. There were objections to the Colonial church when it was built, but people seem very happy with it now, and I feel The Waters will be an equally pleasing addition. Sue and Bob Stover 6000 View Lane Edina Susan Howl geCEIV EU Subject: senior housing: Is it the Emily Program and Orono all over again ?? MAR 7 2 20iQ Dear Joni Bennet, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson, Jim Hovland, Gordon Hughes, Cary Teague and Jackie Hooganacker, Thank you all for your devoted service to the city. I am part of the Countryside neighborhood /community. I value • senior housing, affordable housing, • accessible housing and aging in place in the community, .near family, church, shopping and medical care providers. .My view of the Colonial Church Senior housing project is people won't even know it's there : after the construction phase. I expect rriany.of the people who would live there are part of the aging congregation of Colonial Church. I think it's a wonderful project. I have no connection the the Church, except an awareness of Colonial's long history in the Edina community... back to the 1970's. The oppostion to this project (a building tucked away by highway 62 behind the fire station in an unused huge paved parking lot) seems unreasonable and very exaggerated to me. I was a delegate to the SD41 convention March 6th and I saw a misleading petition being passed around to captive delegates in the WMS auditorium regarding this project - I suggest discounting that petition - to me it is without a lot of meaning since people signed without reading and if they read, they would have been quite mis- informed about the nature of this project based on the portrayal in that petition. I believe many people in Edina want their parents and themselves someday to be able to age in place in dignity so I urge your continued support of this important and necessary senior housing project. There is far more risk in the traffic on Tracy at 62 from the teenagers driving fast & late to high school than from any seniors who would be living in the area or employees commuting to their jobs. Thank you and please stay the course on this senior living project. Susan Khatri Edina, MN Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Living Waters Senior Living Residence RECEIVED Subject: Living Waters Senior Living Residence MAR 2 3 2010 Mayor James Hovland Council Members: Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Scot Housh Ann Swenson City Mgr. Gordon Hughes Planning Dir. Cary Teague Planning, Jackie Hoogenakker While all we see is opposition to this development, we would like to add our overwhelming approval of the proiect. We feel that Edina's seniors need more options in Edina than exist today. Shelter Corp. is known to be a reputable developer, with good history and financial backing. I'm sure this is not news to our City Fathers. There is a move afoot distributing fliers into mail boxes, containing many false and misleading statements, which have little or no basis in fact. We are signed up on the waiting list and have 6 to'8 other seniors (some neighbors here in Nine Mile village) very interested in the availability of such a senior living residence in this Edina location. We heartily endorse the approval of Living Waters Senior Living Residence. ')ave & Joyce Andreasen .334 Red Fox Lane Edina, MN 55436 daioa(@earthlink.net EarthLink Revolves Around You. ,_ Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10 :53 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Assisted Living Building RECEIVED MAR Z 4 2010 Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861. www.citvofedina.com From: Guy Wikman [mailto:gwikman @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Assisted Living Building - Could you please forward to the City Council members. I am sending this in support of the Senior Assisted Living building being proposed for the area adjacent to Crosstown, Colonial Church and the Fire station. I feel this is a win /win scenario. Edina has one of the oldest mean populations in the metro, we can get our seniors out of their homes but still stay in Edina. it is a great location with the support and access of the church on one side, the fire /paramedics on the other side and Fairview Southdale hospital just down the road. It is far enough away from the residential area, can even act as a noise barrier and the church has already proven that they can be good Stewarts to the neighborhood. Let's not restrict the developer too much by limiting the size /scope too much. It is expensive to build a building and there needs to be an incentive /profit. I like that it will be a nice tax base for Edina also. You have my full support for this project. Guy & Jan Wikman 5800 Hansen Road Edina, MN 55436 952- 929 -5993 r from: Carol and Ben McPheeters 5525 Hansen Rd. #211, Edina MN 55430' February 10, 2010 RECEIVED FEB 12 2010 Re: your next meeting concerning The Waters Senior Living of Edina, 6200 Colonial Way To all Edina City Council Members We are like many Edina seniors who chose this community to raise our children, for its excellent schools, churches, variety of shopping, available recreational facilities, medical care and others. We also hope to continue to enjoy Edina's amenities when the time comes for a move to a place for assisted living or for necessary physical care. With the building of The Waters Senior Living of Edina, near the Crosstown 62 and Tracy Avenue, that opportunity opens up. The rental prices are affordable. Its location in central Edina and the careful planning of the available resources to residents is an attractive choice for us. Sincerely, Carol and Ben McPheeters Table of Contents and Key Points to Edina Countryside Neighborhood's Concerns Introduction......................... ............. ................ .................... ........................page 1 Timeline of Group's activities .:................ ............................... .....:....................page 4a Attorney letter to Jay Jenson and Ted Yoch requesting withdrawl of rezoning and development plans ..... .:....................:::...... ...........................page .5 Countryside Neighborhood "Group's Electronic Survey and Petition .......... page. " 7 Electronic Petition and Survey 'Edina Household Information ..................page 11 Neighbor Comments from Electronic Survey —a must read ........................page 64 3 River's District Bike Trail — can it cause a building moratorium Bike Trail Alternative 5F: proposed without CAT (Community Assessment Team) input. Countryside neighborhood not represented .........................page 75 Parking Issues Memo — there's not going to be enough— ......:....................page 79 April photographs — automobiles at Colonial Church ......... ...........................page 81 A good neighbor to the homeowners? .. .......:...................page 84 May 28, 2010 Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation /Living Waters Final application request for approval ... ............................... ...........................page 85 September 2008 Minnesota Business Magazine Article on Shelter Corporation — Risk to the Neighborhood, Margin over Mission, see last pageof article.:....:.." ................................. ............................. .I. ...........................page 111 Letter to Sun Current: Project moving -too fast ..::............... ...........................page 117 Letter to Sun Current: Project too big' ............................................................. page 118 Letter to Sun Current: Site not appropriate for big development ................page 119 Letter to Sun Current: Size, process are concerns, not seniors ....................... page 120 Letter to Sun Current: Countryside comments obscuring legitimate Community concerns .................................. ............................... ....:.....................page 121 Letter to Sun Current: Only 35% of Colonial Church Members Live inEdina .......................................................... ............................... ...........................page 122 Star Tribune article: Synagogue for Sale —Is there financial sustainability forchurches? ....................................... ............................... ...........................page 123 Star Tribune article: Bringing normalcy to memory care in the single story buildings of Emerald Crest .......................... ............................... ...........................page 124 Star Tribune article: Does Edina need yet more senior housing – "Planning Commission member Floyd Grabiel said that some senior developments in the city are ' empty ....................................... ............................... ...........................page 127 National Association of Area Agencies on Aging: aging successfully in their homes is critical to a community's ability to retain its tax base and preserve neighborhood stability ................................. ............................... ...........................page 130 National Association of Area Agencies on Aging: Planning and Zoning — ...a component of a livable community is to have seniors close to the basic amenities (health facilities, supermarkets, drug stores, etc.)— within one - quarter mile ..................................................................... ............................... page 131 Home Modification: Staying in Your Home May be the Best Option Article in Minnesota Senior Housing Directory 2010 -2011 edition AARP Survey finds 9 in 10 of those 65 and over say they would like to stay where they are for as long as possible. Even if they need help caring for Themselves, 82% would prefer not to move from their homes ........................page 133 Senior Housing Directory 2010 -2011 article "Mom and Dad Just Want to Stay at Home -- Home Care Services Can Be the Answer" .. ...........................page 134 Shelter Corporation's "The Colony at Eden Prairie" – Sticker shock for Countryside neighborhood— ........................ ............................... ...........................page 135 Edina Resource Center — Seniors can find help to keep them independent .... page 138 Minnesota Dept of Natural Resources – Letter to Colonial Church re: Wetland Type III – existence of wetlands prior to development ....................page 143 Affidavit of Jed Jenkins, Olinger Blvd resident, states water table and Sewerconcerns ................................................ ............................... ...........................page 144 Yard signs— Introduction. 368 -490 residents oppose the proposed ' ` ` \ Development by yard sign petitions _' .................................. page ' 145 . Pet�|ons— 217 signatures signify tothe pmoposaddeve|opnnent—page' 149 .' Colonial Church members rnaksuo 35V6 of the Con n--see the 3009 Directory .--.__ ................................................................................................. 186 ' . ` ' ` ' ' A. Introduction The Countryside Neighborhood Group was organized on February 28, 2010 in response to the realization that a massive $44 million apartment building complex, proposed to be built in their residential neighborhood, had been preliminarily approved by the Edina Planning Commission and City Council. A handful of neighbors, who had attended the initial meeting with the Developers in December 2009 brought more people together to attend the Planning Commission meeting in January. They in turn began contacting their neighbors to share what they had learned about the size and scope of the proposed project. This small group of neighbors became the steering committee of what would become a group of concerned citizens numbering more than 500 people who are opposed to a for - profit, commercial development in residential Countryside Neighborhood. The group includes neighbors from Greater Edina who are concerned with the implications of the decision on the entire city. The professional skills of members allowed the group to mobilize quickly with organizing, raising money (over $7,000 in a little over a month), creating a website, hiring an attorney, establishing an email communication channel to reach and update residents quickly, securing a phone line and answering service to be reachable by residents who wanted to learn more. Yard signs and flyers were designed and distributed. We now have nearly 200 yard signs displayed in households that represent more than 380 residents, and 247 people have signed petitions. We have an opt -in Google email list of 355 people, which in most cases we have only one email per household, so the group opposed to this project may be closer to 600 people. The Group met with four Edina Planning Commissioners, the Mayor and City Council members to walk the proposed building site and express their concerns. There have been meetings with the heads of Edina Parks and Recreation, Transportation, and Engineering. There have been meetings with the Three Rivers Bike Trail group and the Nine Mile Watershed District. We have conducted research and have worked to understand and communicate to the resident group issues of zoning and the zoning precedence that is being created by this action, ordinances, notification issues, concerns about the policies and processes for large developments, and about the challenges that face our senior citizens. The Group members have worked very hard and spent a lot of time and money because we really care about our neighborhood and Edina. Our concern over the size of the proposed building is our motivating force and is why we feel the building, as it is being proposed, is unacceptable. 9 B. Recognition of Changes to Plan After Community. Meetings Held a. Notice Issues — Sign of Re- Zoning /Development, was placed only on Colonial Way. Hardly any neighborhood residents use Colonial Way; indeed; .many think itIs primarily for access to church parking lots and. not a public street for through -way. „In March the Group asked the City for signs to be posted on Olinger Blvd and facing Highway 62. The request was turned down. Yet on June 16, two weeks before the Planning Commission; meeting, signs, appeared. - b. Neighbors wanted to know why nobody:beyond 1000 feet was notified since a building this size also affects households beyond 1000 feet. c. Countryside Neighborhood Group appreciates the efforts of Colonial and Developer to listen to neighborhood concerns. d. The Group has no concerns with the concept of Senior Housing; the concern relates to size and scope of,the project. e. The Group is dissatisfied with the Final Rezoning and Development Plan and wonders why it is zoned PRD -5 when it should be PSR -4. f. Countryside Neighborhood Group request that plans not be approved. C. Countryside Neighborhood Group's Objections to the Rezoning Plan a. Edina Zoning Code, Section 850.01 et seq, controls zoning changes.. i. Purpose of Code: "provide for orderly and.planned development and re- development of lands and waters in Edina,;to maintain an attractive living and working environment in Edina, to preserve and enhance the high quality residential character of Edina, and to promote the public safety, health and -general welfare...' ii. Objectives of Code: Maintain,. protect and enhance single family'detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use... Where multi- family housing is present, maintain the overall high quality of residential development.... • Provide an enjoyable living environment by preserving existing topography, vegetation, streams, water bodies and other natural land and water forms. iii. Proposed rezoning violates the purpose and objectives of the code b. Inappropriate Zoning Designation No rationale for PRD -5 designation • In reality, this is apartment complex zoning designation. • What is to prevent apartment complex use in future? • Designation gives developer benefit of doubt: 1. Fewer parking spaces required 2. Allows for maximum height ii. Why licensed as "senior living with services" • No guarantee this licensing designation will prevent non - seniors from residing there. iii. Should be PSR -4 as other similar complexes in city, e.g. Sunrise, Heritage, Walker Elder Suites • Nursing care service will be provided • Extended care units —no nursing requirements? c. Proposed Plan Changes Character of Neighborhood i. Currently quiet residential neighborhood ii. No commercial uses within one – two miles (Jerry's and Southdale) Nine Mile Creek Condos are privately owned and residential • Schools • Other churches • K. Kee Auto on Vernon • Vernon Terrace iii. Colonial Church is permitted "non- profit" exception to residential zoning iv. 139 Unit Apartment Complex converts space to commercial, for - profit use • Increased safety and traffic concerns • Commercial delivery vehicles • Colonial Church and Developer profiting at expense of neighborhood well -being d. Proposed Plan Involves Impermissible Spot Zoning • Island of non - conforming use • Reduction in property values 0 D. Problems with Development Plan: a. Size —still too large for the neighborhood • Reduction in property values • Comparison with other spaces in neighborhood b. Number of Units – profit motive /margin • Driving need for size of project Why not smaller project? E. What happens with the property if something unexpected occurs? Project failure? • Church move? F. Future Development Plans Precedent Colonial Phase • Others in the area G. Process Issues Notice (signs) No interaction with neighborhood stake - holders until after preliminary approval • On -going relationship with neighborhood • 3,Rivers Park District Bike Trail • Proof of parking H. Summary a. Deny Application b. Moratorium on a building decision until Bike,Trail issue is decided c. Allow neighborhood input regarding development of land d. Small area plan e. Consider single - family, residential use of the property f. No waiver of 750,000 Park Designation Fee 0 Dec 2007 — Colonial sent RFP's out (see their document) no neighborhood involvement Fall 2008 (or earlier) Colonial selected Shelter (entered into a 30% profit sharing with Colonial donating or selling land- don't know the specifics) no neighbor- hood involvement Dec 2008 — Dec 2009 City of Edina Staff working with Colonial and Shelter —no neighborhood involvement Nov 2009 Neighbors within 1,000 feet received 10 day notice to attend meeting for Dec 9 Dec 9, 2009 Colonial and Shelter held 15 neighborhood meeting (10 people showed up, 5 home owners of single familv homes, 5 town home owners ) - Dec 20 City sent'notices to households within 1000 feet 300 households Dec 29, 2009 Colonial and Shelter filed application Jan 20 City posted one sign on Colonial Way (not many people use Colonial Way) Jan 27, 2010 Planning Commission preliminary approved $44 million project (with a handful of people in attendance Feb 6 City sent notices to households within 1000 feet 300 households Feb 16 City Council preliminary approved $44 million project with a total of 22 people present or wrote in letters. Seven or more from Colonial Church. Only three additional people were for it. Feb 28 — started organizing neighborhood. In shock and stunned with size. Mar — (early) — neighbors requested City Mayor, City Council, 4 Planning Commissioners Council and Planning Commission visit the site to see the reality of the size of proposed building. Mar 8 Reported city was in violation of ordinance with not posting signs on Olinger Blvd and HW 62- City said "it doesn't matter." Apr 5 Steering Committee met with Colonial and Shelter Mar — April 5, 2010 Raised over $7,000 Mar — April Distributed 195 signs, representing about 380 — 450 or more people Mar 29, 2010 Hired an attorney Apr 6 and 8 1h — Colonial Church and Shelter Worked hard to get a meeting with Developer Corporation held meeting with neighbors April 8 n — May 20, 2010 Neighborhood working in good faith with developer so could not talk with Council or Planning Commission as we didn't know what Developer would propose April 20 — Colonial met with Steering Committee May 20 — Steering Committee met with Colonial to view the revision Ma 28 Colonial and Shelter submitted revised plans ya June 1 Attorney sent letter to Colonial and Shelter, rejecting revised plans June 2 — June 19 Neighbors held back in sharing concerns as working in good faith with the developers up to this point. Now need to share letters, get publicity, etc. to share their concerns. Have limited time due to nearly 3 months of waiting for Developer to negotiate or propose new building plan. We were not able to speak with City Leadership during this time acting in "good faith." June 30 Planning Commission Meeting - July 20 City Council. H6 RASMUS LAW OFFICE, LLC 333 South 7th Street, Suite 3020 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel (612) 746 -0321 drasmus@rasmuslaw.net Fax (612) 871 -3215 June 1, 2010 Via Certified Mail Mr. Jay Jensen Shelter Corporation 1600 Hopkins Crossroads Minnetonka, MN 55305 Mr. Ted Yoch c/o Colonial Church 6200 Colonial Way Edina, Minnesota 55436 RE: Waters Senior Living at Colonial Church Dear Mr. Jensen and Mr. Yoch: This follows the meeting at Colonial Church on May 20, and the submission on May 28 of the final application for the Waters Senior Living Development at Colonial Church. First, I want to thank you for the hospitality you extended to the Countryside Neighborhood Group at the meeting on May 20. I know members of the group appreciate the spirit in which you explained the changes to the project following the comments received at the community input meetings in April. The group also appreciates your efforts to make changes to the project based on the comments you received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front facade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the majority of the Countryside residents I represent remain dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood, one that currently does not have any small -scale economic activity The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the Countryside Neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their 0 Jay Jensen%T'ed Yoch Letter June 1, 2010 Page 2 of 2 neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Conceming the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building — Le .,139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The proposed building is similar mass and scope to Valley View Middle School and three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one point I want make very clear: the Countryside residents are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non -profit senior housing project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that you enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Countryside Neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you, and receiving an invitation for my clients to continue their dialogue with you on these important matters. Sincerely, S A E, LLC Dan Rasmus Attorney at Law Cc: Edina City Council Members Edina Planning Commission Members C The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group created an electronic petition /survey on June 21, 2010 to verify how residents were weighing in with the proposed building. Three days later 116 resident's responded, which represents approximately 185 residents because sixty-seven of the people that filled out the petition represent two people in the household. The participation indicates nearly 40 % of people on our email distribution responded within three da r_s_ —_ -- _ —_ - - -- :& Please indicate what you support You may select multiple items. Please keep in mind Colonial Church has the common law right to develop their property within the zoning ordinances. Kee as residential, build - R s single family homes and town homes 73 63% Request a small area plan - we all need to step back to determine options 63 54% _ - - -- - - -� - -- - _—_. ._ — - -- _ _ ... _... -- _..- 2 story, 50 -75 units, complementary in character &symmetry 66 57% -2 stor ,1100 units, complementary in character & symmetry 8 7% 3 story, 44 feet high, 139 units, 600 feet long _ 0_ 0% 4 story, 67 feet high 150 units, 600 feet long original ro osed building) 0 0% Other, please specify - ---- - - - - -- - - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- 9 - ..._ 8% 10.. Do you consider It to be an issue that an exception to the City of Edina's recently approved Comprehensive Plan .be granted to allow for a commercial, for - profit project to be built in a residential area that was never earmarked for such change? Not at all important __ 0 0% - Not very important 1 1 Moderately important 1 - — 1% Very important - - - -- - -- --- - - - - -- 11 - 10% Extremel iy mportant-_ - - - ----- - - - - -- 100_._... -.._. 88%-...-.-: Total - -- - - -- -- 113 _.. -- 100%.- ii .Do you consider it to be an issue that the Planning Commission and City Council provided approval in just 45 days fora $44 million, upscale, apartment complex, when the'lagest stakeholders (2,000 homes within a mile of the proposed site representing approximately $750 million In residential property. value) were not part of the process, while the Church, Developer, and City had been working together on this project for six months or longer? http: / /cityofedi na. com /Departments /Com pPlan.htm Not at all important -_ - -. — _ -.. - -_ -- 0 -- 0% - Not very im op rtant - - - -- -- 0 ....__..._.._ 0 %_ -- Moderately important -- 1 -_ —1 % Very important 13 11% Extremely. ortant . 100 88% _ Total ° - --- - ...- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - 1.1 4 10 ° 12. Do you continue to consider the revised- proposed upscale senior apartment to bean issue even if it is reduced to three stories, 44 feet high (a two story home is typically 25 feet tall), 139 units; but retains most of its mass, and the length of two football fields (600 feet), in a quiet residential neighborhood? Not at all important 0 _ 0% p- - - -- 0% - -, Moderates important - - -_ 2 _ 2% Very important 18 16% Extremely important - -_ _- _ -- 95 - Total - - -- - - - -1- 5 100% -- - - -- -- -- -- 13. Are you concerned about the proposed zoning change, and the city wide implications this zoning precedent may have on greater Edina (i.e. giving non - profit entities a zoning variance for a commercial, for - profit, high - density subdivision variance in a residential neighborhood? No concern Low Moderate- V ry high concern Total 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 8 7 /o 107 92% 116 100% 7 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! Response Status: Completes Filter: No filter applied Jun 23, 2010 6:59 PM PST Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group Concerns Please have every adult in your household that opposes this project fill out this electronic survey and petition. Each person should use their own email, but if you share an email address, please indicate it where asked. Please attend Public Meetings if you agree with the following: 1. Show support for another. option than what the Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation's May 28, 2010 Revised Plans propose; one that is complementary to the character and symmetry of the Edina Countryside residential neighborhood. 2. Express your concerns regarding the zoning . precedent that Is being, created here that may impact,ail residents of Greater Edina. 3. Share,your concerns of the process used.to bypass Edina's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning laws, by creating. a Subdivision and.giving. preliminarily approval to a for - profit Churchlbeveloper Application in a'very short time frame (45 days) Without adequate time for neighborhood input. 1: Edina Household lnformation.(we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) - 116 2: 1.a fo have. Dan Rasmus, the-Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's.attorne i b® ny spglce�spjRMo, at the public reetings: I agree and support the arguments he raises (in the following section): Yes No Total 3. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group opposes the:final rezoning and devi 28; 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plar -symmetry of the-Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Cony are very concerned that a large, for- profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relative' the character of their residential neighborhood: There Is no precedent for a 195,000 placed In the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even si commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neie commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is u who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Countryside reside 114 99% 1 1% 115 100% t5lans for,tFiis project as sutimltted on May :y; do not ft WlthAhe characterand: ie .cezoriing plan, tFi'e Country" slde residents of ibdr.df- lhdnriduals Will Irrevocably alter �ot;;for profit apartipentcomplex being i:camniercl'alactivity. The resulting 1. N. resl6rits believed there would he ur jp to f ose such 'activity on residents hue== to,hd,ddamantIy- QpposeF&to the scope a 112 100% Yes 0 0% No 112 100% Total Page 1 of 3 8 I 4. For households that share thesame email addfress;.se that your husband, wife, partrier, roommate, or other fair petition and survey individual:.. If yod7share 0.sa* with in the additional comment section,: it;Would ?•tie very we can easily summarize their opinion tom, If.y.ou.shai Indicate in the comments section Below; ONCE,.ah0ndi number of responses for you,and allthe otheradults W1 iio not pare thew ne email, select= No; .. meaning share the same-email, arid, you will alit ei submitting this household; please; specify- whoyou share your email ease complete another survey under their. name too so you; ohly: Wahtlto fill, out his petitiontsurvey -once, please pgrises Arid indicate we have PERMISSION to count the Yes 57 54% No 48 46% Total 105 100% 1 Not very important 1 6. By completing and submittlnng this elocironic,petio, ri acid survey, I`5nrarrt my submission o act as my electronic signature. I_agree my feedback may be submitted to the City of Edina; so that City Leadership �nnll ' P.0st :ffd a importance•of my concerns on this important topic. Very important 100 Yes 115 100% No 0 0% 115 100% Total 6. Please indicate what you support .Xor3:may select r ti ffl . 0 . 161 itemsPlease keep in mnd`Colonial'Church has the common law right to develop their, property within thezoning;ordmances Keep as residential, build single family homes andjtown homes 73 63% Request a small area plan - we all need to step back to determine options 63 54% 2 story, 50 -75 units, complementary in character & symmetry 66 57% 2 story, 100 units, complementary in character & symmetry 8 7% 3 story, 44 feet high, 139 units, 600 feet long 0 0% 4 story, 67 feet high, 150 units, 600 feet long (original proposed building) 0 0% Other, please specify: 9 8% 10: Do,you consider itto be an Issue thatan exce0boin to the CityFOf,Edirfa s recently ap roved Compretie rslve Plan'be granted -to -allow for a commercial, for - profit projocCfo be built In a residential ar "ea that;was never ear.'marked for such change? Not at all important 0 0% 1 1 Not very important 1 1 Moderately important 11 10% Very important 100 88% Extremely important 113 100% 11. Do you consider it to be an;issue that_the Planning,f upscale, apartment complex, when the ga ges stA holi $750 million in residential properly value);We,[e not gait° on this project for six months or- longer7 = Fittptllcltyofer rand City. Council provided apprcival,in just 45 days for a $44 million, homer. ithln._ra mile of 'he_proposedLsite representing approximately ess: iihild',the•Church;;;Devbioperi and City'had-been working togethe Not at all important 0 0% Not very important 0 0% Moderately important 1 1 Page 2 of 3 Very important 13 11% Extremely important 100 88% Total 114 100% 12. Do you continue to consiadr tl e-revised proposal! u is iersonior apartment. Fie an issue -even if.lfls reduced ao three stories, 44 feet high (a two story home is1 pically 25lbet tall); 139 units,+but•retalhs most of its mass, and the:.lengt .of. two football volunteer, or to Iearn more. fields (600 feet), in a quiet .resi4ential rieiglibdth,66 J? Buy a yard sign for only $10 Not at all important 0 0% Not very important 0 0% Moderately important 2 2% Very important 18 16% Extremely important 95 83% TMnl 115 100% 13:.Are you concerned abgut thetiprroposed�zonmi� change „arttdy� e�Ettya iide'i�nplicatlons this zoning precedent.may haVb-on greater Edina (Le. giving non profile entitles -a ronirig` ar�ance foha, 66m�naFclal�f3i ;profile,�liigh- densiw6614ivis on variance in.a residential I.1. - ` neighborhood? No concern 0 0% Low 0 0% Moderate 1 1 % High 8 7% Very high concern 107 92% 116 100% 14. Please express any other thoughts',o,r eorf erns you':maj► have:: 40 CPC 15: I would like to be invoived;ln,other a)Aivitie-s #oisNppof tFie cerise please go fo www:edlinacounttvside.com to contribute, volunteer, or to Iearn more. Buy a yard sign for only $10 11 19% Deliver flyers to educate my fellow residents of Greater Edina 10 17% Sign the petition (each adult member in household to complete the electronic petition once it is sent) 43 73% Attend public meetings as mentioned above 47 80% Financially contribute 17 29% llfh— PionQo SnPCifv 7 12% Thank you for participating ih this survey:< Page 3 of 3 � 0 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 10 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & 2p o ! e ra ng_ Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:08 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) i # I Response 1 First Name Karen Last Name 1 Ostman Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 48 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 1 5917 Olinger Road City Edina State Minnestoa 1Zip 554356 Email ! ostman44 @msn.com Other Adult Member's Email 1 claricem,ostman @gmail.com 1 Other Adult Member's Email blackman77 @hotmai.com First Name i Susan Last Name Keator Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 11 Average age of adults 154 i Children in Edina Schools ( #) i2 10 Address 5041 Yvonne City i Edina ' State j MN Zip I 155436 i I Email chickadeedee55 @gmail.com 1 � First Name — .---------------- - - - - -- I ' jBURTON 3 Last Name �SHACTER I Spouse First Name !BEVERLY http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print —all= 6/23/2010 / Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition;& Survey! 0... Page 2 of 10 Spouse Last Name SHACTER Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) i2 Average age of adults f 72 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 10 1 Age of Children 45, •47,49 Address :5800 ARBOUR AVENUE City EDINA j I State. j MN Zip j 55436 I I Email bbshacter @comcast.net - �.Spouse's Email same First Name Annette Last Name Kuck Spouse First Name Timothy Spouse Last Name I Kuck Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 152 Children in Edina Schools ( #) I1 , Age of Children ! i 16 I �4 Address 6316 Westwood Court City' _ Edina State jMN Zip 55436 Email kuckhouse @comcast.net Spouse's Email j same Other Adult Member's Email Leah Other Adult Member's Email same First Name I Ron Last Name Fraboni Spouse First Name Barbara 5 Spouse Last Name Fraboni Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 Average age of adults i68 http: // app. zoomerang. com/ ReportTrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang 1 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 10 Children in Edina Schools W 0 Address 5505 Grove street City Edina State 'MN Zip 55436 I Email Frabonimn @earthlink.net First Name 'Timothy Last Name Kuck 1 Spouse First Name I Annette Spouse Last Name Kuck Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 13 Average age of adults 150 i Children in Edina Schools ( #) 6 I 1 Age of Children 116,18 Address 6316 Westwood Ct City Edina j State �MIN i Zip 155436 1 Email j kuckhouse @comcast.net i Spouse's Email kuckhouse @comcast.net First Name Nancy Last Name Lopez Spouse First Name j Mario Spouse Last Name Lopez Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 i Average age of adults 43 7 I Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 7,3 1 Address 5420 Countryside Rd i City Edina State ;MN Zip 155436 Email lopezgrubb @yahoo.com http: / /app. zoomerang. com/ Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage. aspx ?print_al l= 6/23/2010 ' 3 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 10 j First Name Gary Last Name Lee Address :5621 Wycliffe Rd 8 City Edina' State �MN i Zip 155436 First Name Molly Last Name Urbanski j 1 Spouse First Name ! Jason Spouse Last Name I Urbanski Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) i 12 Average age of adults 140 9 i Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 1 Age of Children 19,12 Address 1 5800 Stuart Avenue I, City I Edina State 1MN j 1 Zip 155436 1 Email 1 urbys @comcast.net First Name Bridget Last Name j Baird j Spouse First Name Doug j Spouse Last Name Baird j Taxpayers /Voters in Household 2 Average age of adults 140 1 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 10 1 Age of Children 18, 5 Address 1 5805 W 61st St City Edina State MN . . Zip 55436 1 Email bridget.baird @target.com Spouse's Email douglas.baird @bsci.com http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 10 First Name j TIM Last Name 11 j Robb Average age of adults 39 First Name .Brian Last Name i Simmons Spouse First Name Audrey j Spouse Last Name j Simmons Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) ,2 Average age of adults 141 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 12 i 12 I Age of Children �11 and 13 i ! Address 5813 Arbour Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email BSIMMONS55 @Comcast.Net Spouse's Email BSIMMONS55 @Comcast.Net First Name j Rosemary Last Name Rustad Spouse First Name Greg Spouse Last Name Rustad Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) I 2 Average age of adults 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 113 j Age of Children 10,13 Address 5616 Grove Street i city j Edina State 'MN j Zip '55436 Email rkrustad @comcast.net Spouse's Email j grustad @schadegg - mech.com First Name 14 Mario Last Name http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage. aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang -J Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition &Survey! 0... Page 6 of 10 Lopez Spouse First Name Nancy Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 43:; 1 Children in Edina Schools,( #) i1 Age of Children 118,7,4 - Address. 5420 Countryside Rd City 1 Edina' _ State i MW 1 I Zip • 1 . 55436 Email mltirado @Vahoo.com First Name Lawrence i Last Name I Kerzner Spouse First Name Dorothy 1 Spouse Last Name Kerzner Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) r 12 I Average age of adults 158 Children in Edina Schools ( #) I15 0 j Age of Children 124,21 Address 1 5828 Jeff Place i city i Edina State MN I Zip I 55436 Email Lewrence.Kerzner @hcmed . org (Spouse's Email DKerzner @comcast.net i First Name I j dreg I Last Name Rustad i Spouse First Name 1 Rose Spouse Last Name Rustad 16 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults '45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 110,13 Address http://app.zoomerang..com/ Report/ PrintOpenEridedResponsesPage .'aspx ?print_al l 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 10 5616 Grove Street City Edina State MN Zip ;55436 1 Email grustad @schadegg- mech.com Spouse's Email rkrustad@comcast.net Name jim Last Name sletten Spouse First Name Jane Spouse Last Name sletten Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 45 17 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5906 olinger road City edina State mn ! Zip 55436 Email jjdts @aol.com Spouse's Email jsletten @aol.com First Name {spencer ILast Name turner Spouse First Name miriam Spouse Last Name I turner Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 70 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 118 10 Address 6208 hillside rd j City edina State mn' Zip 55436 i Email turnersal2 @gmail.com Spouse's Email same First Name 19 Barbara Last Name http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al l= l 6/23/2010 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 10 'Hoganson i Spouse First Name John Spouse,Last Name Harden Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 0 Children in Edina Schools( #) :0 Age of Children 10 Address 829 Jeff Place city Edina I State MN j Zip 155436 l Email barbarahoganson @comcast.net Spouse's Email j.harden @comcast.net First Name - - - - - - -- - -- -: - -- timothy Last Name Ioshaughnessy j Spouse First Name j cori Spouse Last Name !oshaughenssy Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 20 ! Children in Edina Schools ( #) '•0 Address 6308 valley view rd i City I edina State mn Zip ;55436 I Email oshag6325 @yahoo;com First Name corrin Last Name . O'Shaughnessy Spouse First Name Tim Spouse Last Name O'Shaughnessy 21 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) Average age of. adults 37 Children in Edina Schools ( #) i0 Address 6308 Valley View Road City http: / /app.zoomerang. com/ Report /PrintOpenEndedR6sponsesPage .aspx ?print_al l 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 10 Edina State iMN Zip 55436 Email corioshaughnessy @gmail.com Spouse's Email oshag6325 @yahoo.com First Name I dorothy Last Name pool Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) '1 j Average age of adults j80 22 OChildren in Edina Schools ( #) j Address 1 6241 Crescent Drive j city edina State mn Zip 55436 First Name j Susan Last Name 'Chandler Spouse First Name ! Bruce Spouse Last Name McLellan Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 58 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 23 j l Age of Children 17 Address 5709 Hawkes Drive City Edina State -MN Zip 155436 j Email I stcedina @aol.com First Name franz Last Name i burris Spouse First Name Joanne 24 Spouse Last Name burris Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) .2 Average age of adults 73 Children in Edina Schools ( #) http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_al l= 3 6/23/2010 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's 'Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 10 ,0 Address 5832 olinger blvd. city edina State Imn ''Zip 55436 Email franzsr @aol.com 1 Spouse's Email burrisjo@aol.com i First Name Hans L I =Last Name Koenig Spouse First Name !Vaughn Spouse Last Name Koenig ! Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 1 Average age of adults 75 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 25 10 j Address 6209 Crest Lane ! city Edina State 'MN Zip 155436 j Email hkoenig @blakeschool.org Spouse's Email same Products & Services I About Us I SupportlHelp ! Zoomerang Forums © 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use a http :// app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 11 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Zoom a ra n g- Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:03 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # _ Response i i I 26 '27 First Name Sue Last Name Claseb Spouse First Name Jeremy Spouse Last Name Clasen Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 35 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 18 months, 3 years old Address 5600 Grove St City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email sueclasen@comcast.net First Name Eileen Last Name OShaughnessy Spouse First Name David Spouse Last Name j Dahl Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 54 ! Children in Edina Schools ( #) I1 1 Age of Children :16,14 Address ! 4216 Sunnyside Rd. City Edina ! State MN Z' p 55424 Email http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print —all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood - Group's Electronic Petition & Survey!.: 0... Page 2 of 11 oshau001 @umn.edu Spouse's•Email dahlx006 @umn.edu First Name 1 Nancy Last Name Huseby Spouse First Name John Spouse Last Name ' Huseby Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 46 28 Address 5904 Arbour Ave I City Edina • State IMN Zip i 155436 Email nobiz @comcast.net Spouse's Email j i hobiz @comcast.net First Name Marta ' Last Name Melin Spouse First Name William Spouse Last Name Melin Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 I Average age of adults 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 29 2 Age of Children 12,14, 16 I Address j 16111 Olinger Blvd. City ' Edina State IMN zip 55436 I Email martamelin @gmail.com I Spouse's Email i williammelin @gmail.com First Name Wayne 1 Last Name j Kewitsch Spouse First Name 30 Ruth Spouse Last Name Kewitsch Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age ofadults http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 �'Z Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 11 44 Children in Edina Schools ( #) i3 Age of Children 14, 12,9 Address 5624 Doron Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email wkewitsch @gmail.com Spouse's Email rkewitsch @gmail.com First Name Xinying (Cindy) Last Name IYu Spouse First Name I I Xuemin Spouse Last Name Yang Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults j 136 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 31 1 Age of Children 16 Address 5708 Benton Ave City Edina State 'MN Zip 55436 Email yu_xinying @yahoo.com Spouse's Email xueminyang07 @yahoo.com ! First Name (John Last Name St. Pierre ' Spouse First Name Jeanne Spouse Last Name r St. Pierre 1 I Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 32 1 Average age of adults 1 159 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 27, 30 Address 6005 Arbour Lane City Edina State http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print —all= 6/24/2010 0 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 11 !MN Ztp 55436 Email jst.plerre@comcast.net Spouse's Email jeanne.stpierre @target.com Other Adult Member's Email 0 .., First Name I Cindy Last Name Nelson Spouse First Name I greg Spouse Last Name Nelson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) r 2 Average age of adults �50 33 Children in Edina Schools ( #) i 2 Age of Children 12,14 Address 1 6120 hanson rd City edina State mn I Zip i 1,55436 I Email i Ali i � I f � I I I ; 34 ' I I i i i 35 grump007 @aol.com First Name Farkhod Last Name Salamov Spouse First Name Madinabonu Spouse Last Name Salamova Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults. 28 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 3,5 Address 5708 Hawkes terrace City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email farkhodbek @yahoo.com Spouse's Email farkhod_and_madina @yahoo.com. First Name Susan Last Name http: / /app.zoomerdng.bom/ Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 p� `i Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 11 I i I I I i i 36 Petersen Spouse First Name Jeff Spouse Last Name Petersen Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 52 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6213 Hillside Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email susanpetersen4@comcast.net Spouse's Email Edinaitel @yahoo.com First Name Carol Last Name Burmaster Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 1 Average age of adults 67 Address 6012 Birchcrest Drive City Edina State Minnesota Zip 55436 Email caburmaster @gmail.com First Name Ann Last Name `I Compton Spouse First Name Charles Kendall Spouse Last Name Compton Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 14 Average age of adults 138.5 37 i Children in Edina Schools ( #) 10 Age of Children 21, 19 Address 5201 Lochloy Dr City Edina State MN Zip 155436 Email http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6124/2010 42 Zo ornerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhodabr6up's Electronic Petition & SurVey! "0... Page 6 o I I anncompton@comcast.net Spouse's Email anncompton@comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email I arincompton@comcast:net Other Adult Member's Email anncompton@comcast.net First Name Jeff Last Name Petersen I Spouse First Name Susan Spouse Last Name Petersen Taxpayers /Voters in Household 2 Average age of adults 152 38 Children in Edina Schools ' 10 Address 6213 Hillside Road city Edina 1 State MN Zip 55436 Email edinaitel@yahoo.com Spouse's Email susanpetersen4@comcast. net First Name dad! Last Name setiadi Spouse First Name pen! I Spouse Last Name I isetiadi Taxpayers/Voters in Household (#) 2 I Average age of adults 2 Children in Edina Schools 2 Age of Children 39 14 and 8 1 Address 5641 Jeff Place city Edina State MN I Zip 155436 1 Email dadi—s@yahoo.com i Spouse's Email pwuriandari@yahoo-corn Other Adult Member's Email ii Other Adult Member's Email http://app.zoomer"ang.com/Rep6rt/PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx?print—al.l= 6/24/2010 U26 , Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 11 First Name I Christine Last Name I Henninger Spouse First Name Chuck Spouse Last Name Henninger Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults ,46 I Children in Edina Schools ( #) 40 I Age of Children 14,8, 6 j Address 5816 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 155436 ! ! Email christine.henninger @genmills.com Spouse's Email chashenninger @comcast.net First Name Michelle Last Name Lohrding Spouse First Name I Brad Spouse Last Name Lohrding Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 Average age of adults 141 41 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 12 1 Age of Children �9 &11 Address 5300 Benton Ave City j Edina State MN Zip 155436 j Email m.lohrding @earthlink.net ! First Name Mark Last Name i Bourget Spouse First Name 42 Katie Spouse Last Name Bourget I Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 42 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 -% Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 11 43 44 Children in Edina Schools ( #) I1 I Age of Children i7 and 5 Address 6203 South Knoll Dr City Edina State MN Zip 155436 Email mark @bourgetimports.com Spouse's Email katycargirl @yahoo.com First Name Sally Last Name Mays 1 Spouse First Name Gary Spouse Last Name Mays Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 35 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 21+ Address 15529 Countryside Rd City Edina State MN Zip 155436 -2503 Email Tech lms@gmail.corn Spouse's Email Fromedinatoo @comcast.net � First Name Katie Last Name Bourget Spouse First Name Mark i Spouse Last Name Bourget Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) '2 jAverage age of adults 142 Children in Edina Schools ( #) i1 1 Age of Children 7 and 5 Address 6203 South Knoll Dr City I Edina ,State !MN http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 11 Zip .55436 Email katyca rgirl @yahoo -corn Spouse's Email mark @bourgetimports.com First Name Richard Last Name Conkey Spouse First Name Hallee Spouse Last Name i Conkey Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) I 2 Average age of adults 43 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5605 Tracy Ave. S. City Edina State MN Zip 155436 Email j HRconkey @comcast.net j Spouse's Email I HRconkey @comcast.net i .46 47 First Name Roger Last Name Bentley Spouse First Name Jan Spouse Last Name Bentley Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 55 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children adult Address 6338 Valley View Road City Edina I State IMN Zip 55436 Email roger.bentley @gmai1.com First Name Mary Last Name Mulheran Spouse First Name 1. Peter Spouse Last Name i Mulheran http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 p� CJ Zoomerang Edina'Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! ::.. 'Page 10 of 11 i Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults '.50 Children in Edina Schools( #) i0 Age of Children 19 j Address i 5940 Arbour Avenue City Edina State :MN J Z10 . 55436 Email i mmulheran @comcast.net First Name Dorothy I Last Name Kerzner j • i Spouse First Name Lawrence . Spouse Last Name ! Kerzner Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 (1 votes by absentee ballot) Average age of adults 57 1 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 21 and 24 j 48 ' Address i 1 5828 Jeff Place City Edina State Minnesota i Zip 55436, i Email dkerzner @comcast.net Spouse's Email ! Ikerznerl @comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email j 1 theredjeff @gmail`.com Other Adult Member's Email ethan.kerzner @gmail.com - j - - -- - -- - -- -- .------------ - ----- . -- I First Name Peter j Last Name Mulheran Spouse First Name 1 Mary 'Spouse Last Name 49 Mulheran Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 1 Average age of adults 150 " !Children in Edina Schools ( #) o Age of Children _.. j! 26,23,19 http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ Priht0penEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print -all =. 6/24/2010 _ (3 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 11 of 11 Address 5940 Arbour Ave I city I Edina State IMn j zip '55436 j Email petem @sa ni- blast.com Spouse's Email marym @sani - blast.com First Name Erik Last Name 1Jensen j Spouse First Name Elizabeth Spouse Last Name (Jensen Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 37 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 50 10 I Age of Children 2 children: 2 years and 5 months Address 5916 Olinger Boulevard city Edina State IMN 1 Zip 155436 i Email i erik.jensen @bestbuy.com Spouse's Email j elizabeth.jensen @comcast.net Products & Services 1 About Us 1 Support/Help 1 Zoomerang Forums © 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy 1 Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 / Zoomerahg I Edina Countryside Neighborhood. Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! O . Page 1 of 11 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Zoo iii e f a n g— Survey! Results. overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:12 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied - -- ._.. ._._.— _.._— ... ......... .._.....__ 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to'fill out all the information that is applicable) # i Response 1-- - - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - -- ._._...__,..- -- ...- - -- -- -- - - First Name (John i Cast Name j Hoel I Spouse First Name j Emma I f Spouse Last Name Hoel Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 25 51 i Children in Edina Schools ( #) ,o Address 1 6217 Wyman Avenue iCity i i Edina j State i �MN I i . Zip 1 j55436 IEmail johnhoel @mac.com - - - - - -- - ._._....--- ...-- - - - - -- - - - - -! First -Name I I Ma ry Ann i i Last Name Meyer Taxpayers /Voters in Household I 3 i Average age of adults 52, 59, 20 52 I Address 5805 Jeff Place City j Edina State ' LMn Zip 55436 1 I Email marem @mindspring.com First Name j Bill Last Name •i 53 !Johnson Spouse First Name I Judy Spouse Last Name iJohnson dResponsesPage :aspx ?print all° 6/24/2010 h4:H app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEnde Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 11 i i 54 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 59 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6201 Parkwood Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email bjohnson11938@comcast.net Spouse's Email na Other Adult Member's Email na Other Adult Member's Email na First Name Donna i Last Name Callender Spouse First Name Steve Spouse Last Name Callender Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 57 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children n/a Address 5415 countryside rd City edina State mn Zip 55436 j Email j merlin1954 @aol.com First Name Clarice Last Name Ostman Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 10 55 j Address 5917 Olinger Road city Edina State MN Zip 155436 Email I claricem.ostman @gmail.com http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print —all= 6/24/2010 3 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page.3 of 11 Other Adult Member's Email 1 blacman77 @hotmail.com First Name Jeannie Last Name Wallschlaeger Spouse First Name Steve Spouse Last Name Wallschldeger Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 jAverage age of adults i '48 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 56 i2 Age of Children 16,14 Address j 5621 Dale Ave City j Edina State MN Zip 155436 Email jwallschlaeger @lifetouch.com i Spouse's Email i swallschiaeger @earthlink.net First Name Raymond i Last Name Voss I I Spouse First Name Lois i Spouse Last Name Voss Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults j 69 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 157Ip j 1 Address 15716 Benton Ave. City Edina i State MN zip ;55436 I Email i rayvoss @aol.com Spouse's Email loisvoss @aol.com ._._._.- -First Name -- - --- - - - - -- ------ ---------- - - - - -' James 'Last Name i i Alien 58 Spouse First Name Elaine Spouse Last Name Allen Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) , 12 http:H app; zoomerang.com/ Report/ PriiitOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/24/2010 3 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 11 Average age of adults >70 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 j Age of Children N/A Address 5708 Wycliffe Rd. City Edina State IMN Zip 55436 Email allen024 @umn.edu Spouse's Email j allen024 @umn.edu Other Adult Member's Email N/A Other Adult Member's Email N/A - i i I 59 i First Name Lois Last Name Voss Spouse First Name Raymond Spouse Last Name Voss Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 69 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5716 Benton Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email loisvoss @aol.com Spouse's Email rayvoss @aol.com FirsN me Steve Last Name Wallschlaeger Spouse First Name Jeannie Spouse Last Name I Wallschlaeger 60 I Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 Average age of adults 48 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 12 Age of Children 14, 16 Address 15621 Dale Ave http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/24/2010 (2D Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! 0... Page 5 of TI I City 'Edina State 'MN Zip i 55436 Email swallschlaeger @lifetouch.com Spouse's Email jwallschlaeger @lifetouch.com First Name Gary Griffiths i Spouse First Name Barbara Spouse Last Name 1 Griffiths Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 150s Children in Edina Schools ( #) 01 Age of Children 61 I Address 5844 Creek Valley Rd city 1 Edina State MN Zip 155439 Email creekvalleyl@comcast.net Spouse's Email same Other Adult Member's Email j same i Other Adult Member's Email I same - ---._.-.-..__._.._— .............. -------- .— .- ....... -- ._.__._..._. _.....__... First Name i I Linda Last Name Enck i Spouse First Name j Steven Spouse Last Name Enck Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 62 150 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 1 9, 9 Address 5700 Benton Avenue City Edina State MN, Zip 55436 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedRespgnsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24./2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 11 Email slamenck@comcast.net Spouse's Email I slamenck @comcast.net First Name Elizabeth Last Name Beer Spouse First Name James j Spouse Last Name 63 Beer Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults ' 60 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 ISpouse's Email 1 jbeer5804 @gmail.com First Name I Phil Last Name Bohrer Spouse First Name i iJean Spouse Last Name McDowall I 'Taxpayers/Voters in Household ( #) I 12 Average age of adults 52 64 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 j I Address 15900 Amy Drive City Edina { j State MN Zip 155436 Email j philipjbohrer @yahoo.com 1 Spouse's Email jmcdowall @daymon.com First Name PAUL Last Name BELVEDERE Spouse First Name GAIL Spouse Last Name BELVEDERE 1 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 165 2 Average age of adults 75 Children in Edina Schools ( #) FO Age of Children 1 58, 52, 46, 44 1 Address 5824 CREEK VALLEY RD City EDINA http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 ( { 7) Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition. &; Survey! : 0... Page 7 of H ' State !MN Zip 155439 -1212 Email- velvytooth @aol.com Spouse's Email velvytooth @aol.com !.Other Adult Member's Email velvytooth @aol.com Other Adult Member's Email ;velvytooth @aol.com First Name peggy Last Name dodge Spouse First Name david Spouse Last Name dodge Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) i 2 Average age of adults 160 j 166 Children in Edina Schools( #) 0 Address 6117 sherman circle I City 1 edina State I mn Zip I 155436 I I Email pegdodge @comcast.net - -- -- — - -- -- --- - - - - -- -... _— ... - -- - - - --- - -- —.._.._._-...._ .... ........... _......._ ........ - _.. - .__..._..,..I First Name i Rosemary Last Name I Sundin Spouse,First Name N/A Spouse Last Name I N/A Taxpayers /Voters in Household 1 i Average age of adults 47 I 167 Children in Edina Schools ( #) I0 I Address j5805 Tracy Avenue City Edina State JMN Zip 55436 Email rsundin @ormanguidance.com First Name Kirk '68 1 Last Name , Swenson Spouse First Name kris h4://4pp.zoomerang.com/ Report /PrintOpenEnd6dResponsesPage .aspx ?print_al l= 6/24/2010 3Q Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 11 'Spouse Last Name Swenson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 46 Children in Edina Schools ( #) '2 j Age of Children 9,11 Address 5924 Amy Dr City Edina State iMN zip 155436 1 First Name 1 Inna Last Name Hays Spouse First Name Spouse Last Name Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) �1 Average age of adults f 74 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 10 Age of Children 69 0 Address 5857 Creek Valley Road City Edina State iMN zip 155439 Email innaci @aol.com Spouse's Email Other Adult Member's Email I Other Adult Member's Email First Name i Paul Last Name j Axt j Spouse First Name Anita Spouse Last Name 70 I Axt Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 5 Average age of adults 132 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 10 Age of Children 1 18, 21, 24 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_al l= 6/24/2010 9 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 11 Address 6109 Olinger Boulevard City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email pauljaxt @gmail.com Spouse's Email awaxt @earthlink.net Other Adult Member's Email emma.axt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email axtxX010 @umn.edu First Name Rachel Last Name Axt Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 15 j Average age of adults 132 Address 6109 Olinger Boulevard 71 ; City Edina IState !MN Zip 155436 Email axtxx010 @umn.edu Other Adult Member's Email pauljaxt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email j awaxt @earthlink.net First Name Eleanor Last Name i Axt Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 15 I Average age of adults 32 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address f72 6109 Olinger Boulevard j City i Edina State 1 MN Zip 55436 1 Email eleanor.axt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email pauljaxt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email awaxt @earthlink.net j First Name 73 Michael Last Name Lonergan http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print —all= 6124/2010 �0 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 11 i X74 75 Spouse First Name Jayne Spouse Last Name Lonergan Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 60 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 32,36,40 Address 5812 Olinger Blvd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email pepintl @msn.com First Name Tracey Last Name Illies Spouse First Name Tom Spouse Last Name Illies Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 44 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 4 Age of Children 8,8, 11, 14 Address 5200 west 61st Street City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email ttillies @aol.com First Name Kristin Last Name Engman Spouse First Name (Jonathan Spouse Last Name Engman Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) ':2 Average age of adults 36 !Children in Edina Schools ( #) i2 Age of Children 8 and 6 Address 5236 West 56th Street http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 �� Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! ::...,Page 11 of 11 i city Edina State MN, Zip 55436 Email Kristinengman @yahoo.com j Spouse's Email engm0003 @umn.edu i i Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums a m 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. i Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use .zoomeran httP : //a .com/ Report / PrintO penEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 ` 2 PP g Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 11 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic .Petition & 47 Zo o m e ra ng" Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:13 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied j 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # Response i First Name jane Last Name sletten j Spouse First Name jim spouse Last Name sletten ! Taxpayers /Voters In Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) to 76 i Age of Children ' 22,24 Address 5906 olinger road city I edina t ; State jmn Zip 55436 i Email jseetten @aol.com Spouse's Email jjdts @aol.com I � First Name --- - -_- -- Marlys Last Name j I Husebo Spouse First Name Manford Spouse Last Name i Husebo Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 77 ; Average age of adults 70+ Children in Edina Schools ( #) None Age of Children �NA j Address 16232 Oriole Lane city Edina State Minnesot http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.. aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang 1 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 11 i Zip 55436 First Name John Last Name Harden Spouse First Name Barbara Spouse Last Name .Hoganson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 1 159 78 Children in Edina Schools ( #) ;0 j ! Address 5829 Jeff Place City j Edina State MN i 1 Zip ' 55436 Email j.harden@comcast.net First Name ying Last Name qi Spouse First Name zhiyong i i Spouse Last Name 1zhang i ' Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) � 12 f Average age of adults X42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 79 Age of Children �11 j Address 6101 olinger blvd i City i j edina j State minnesota i Zip i55436 Email celiayinggi @gmail.com Spouse's Email zhiy_zhang @yahoo.com First Name Gayle I Last Name Gaumer j Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) '3 80 !, Average age of adults 34 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5209 Lochloy Drive http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/24/2010 CL14? Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 11 City Edina State jMN Zip 55436 Email wilsonlawfirm @msn.com First Name zhiyong i Last Name zhang Spouse First Name ying Spouse Last Name qi Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults j42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) !81 !1 Age of Children j Address 1 6101 olinger blvd City edina State minnesota Zip •55436 Email zhiy_zhang @yahoo.com Spouse's Email celiayinggi @gmail.com First Name Philip Last Name Johnson Spouse First Name Dorinda Spouse Last Name Johnson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults ;41 82 I Address 5045 Yvonne Terrace i City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email philndodie @comcast:net Spouse's Email philndodie @comcast.net First Name Emma 83 Last Name Axt Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 5 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al l= 6/24/2010 0 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! °: 0... Page 4 of 11 Average age of adults 32 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6109 `Olinger Blvd City Edina State Minnesota Zip.., ;55436 Email emma.axt @gmail.com First Name :Joyce Last Name 'Sutherland" Spouse First Name 'Jim Spouse Last Name Sutherland Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) i2 i.Average age of adults 75 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 84 Age of Children Adults Address 6104 Westridge Blvd. City Edina " State !MN i Zip 55436 Email j.sutherland2 @comcast.net Spouse's Email same First Name Elizabeth Last Name i Jensen Spouse First Name Erik Spouse Last Name Jensen ! Taxpayers /Voters in Household '2 Average age of adults 85 35 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2. Age of Children 2 and 6 mo Address 5916 olinger blvd City. Edina State Mn Zip 55436 / Repor/ PintOpenndedResponsesPge .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 h tt p : //a pp zoomerang.com �j Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 11 Email Elizabeth.jensen@comcast.net Spouse's Email Erik.jensen @bestbuy.com First Name Kristina Last Name Bohrer Spouse First Name Kevin Spouse Last Name Bohrer Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 86 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children i7,9 1 Address 5605 Dale Ave City Edina State MN ! Zip 55436 1 Email ktasbohrer @yahoo.com First Name Matthew Last Name i Headrick Spouse First Name Cassandra Spouse Last Name Headrick I Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 Average age of adults 35 87 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 (ECFE and Preschool) i Age of Children 2 and 4 Address 5920 Amy Drive City Edina State jMN I Zip 1 155436 Email cmuldoon200l@yahoo.com First Name Stephen Last Name Nerg 88 Spouse First Name Jessica Spouse Last Name :Berg Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage. aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 0 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition &.,Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 11 Average age of adults 33' Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 (future) Age of.Children 3-& 7mo. Address 5820,01inger BLVD City, Edina State . MN Zip— :554j6 . Email I.Ninetwenty @earthlink.net j First Name Anne, LasfName j McCoy Spouse First Name Kevin Spouse Last Name McCoy Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 1 ; Average age of adults 147 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 12 89 i Age of Children i11 &13 1 Address 5809 Jeff Place City Edina State MN f Zip 1 j 55436 i !Email annemccoy @comcast.net Spouse's Email kmccoy2 @comcast.net First Name Arine Last Name i Murray !..Spouse First Name i George Spouse Last Name I Edmonson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) j2 90 ` Average age of adults 1 53 Address 6621 Iroquois Trail City Edina State Mn 1 Zip 55439 1 Email amurray @cdrg.org http://app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/24/2010 8 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 11 Spouse's Email amurray @cdrg.org First Name Kent Last Name Gravelle Spouse First Name Holly Spouse Last Name Gravelle 1 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 Children in Edina Schools ( #) ;91 '0 ! Age of Children n/a Address 5609 Tracy Ave. City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com Spouse's Email hollyg ravel le @aol.corn First Name Holly Last Name Gravelle Spouse First Name Kent Spouse Last Name Gravelle Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 12 Average age of adults 40 92 Children in Edina Schools ( #) no 1 Address 5609 Tracy Avenue City Edina State MN Zip 55436 1 Email hollygravelie @aol.com Spouse's Email j kentgravelle @aol.com First Name Bryan Last Name Rhody 93 Spouse First Name Stephanie Spouse Last Name Rhody Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 http :// app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Ay I Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 11 Average age of adults 34 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children i 1, 3 Address 6319 Valley View Rd City Edina State MN Zip .55436 Email ! rhodys @msn.com j First Name j i f David ! j I Last Name i Henry Spouse First Name Karen Spouse Last Name i Henry j Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) .4 j Average age of adults 30 94 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 at Edina, 2 at Southwest, 2 freshmen college Age of Children j 18,18,17,16,15 Address 5712 Creek Valley Road City Edina i State MN I Zip 55439 Email dhenry.mn @comcast.net First Name j ! Michele Last Name LeFebvre Spouse First Name i Tony Spouse Last Name LeFebvre Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 195 ,42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) i :2 Age of Children 13,11,4 Address 6020 Arbour Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 �`� Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 11 Email Mtlefebvre @comcast.net First Name Xuemin Last Name Yang Spouse First Name i Xinying Spouse Last Name Yu Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) i2 Average age of adults 36 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 96 1 Age of Children 16 iAddress 5708 Benton Ave City I Edina State !MN Zip 1;55436 Email xueminyang07 @yahoo -corn f Spouse's Email i yu_xinying @yahoo.com I First Name j Kevin I Last Name Bohrer Spouse First Name i Kristina Spouse Last Name I Bohrer Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) '2 Average age of adults 41 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 12 97 Age of Children 9,7 i Address 5605 Dale Ave j City Edina State IMN Zip :55436 Email kbohrer @shawlundquist.com Spouse's Email I ktasbohrer @yahoo.com 'First Name Bill Last Name 98 Cosgrove Spouse First Name Peggu Spouse Last Name Cosgrove http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage. aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 / Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 11 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 70 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6104 Tracy Avenue S City Edina State ;MN Zip 55436 Email bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu Spouse's Email ! bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu First Name Scott Last Name ! Haarstad ! Spouse First Name Carol Spouse Last Name Haarstad Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 52 99 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 117,21 Address 6113 Tracy Ave City Edina State MN Zip 155436 I Email scott.haarstad @gmail.com iFirst Name - - - -- ----- - - - - -_ Jenny Last Name Covington Spouse First Name Brian 'Spouse Last Name Craggs Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 100 Average age of adults 34 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children .11 Address 6229 Crescent Drive City Edina State MN http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al l= 6/24/2010 5Z Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 11 of 11 Zip ;55436 i Email cov1000 @gmail.com Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums © 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al1 = 6/24/2010 So Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page I of 10 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & p � Zoomel'aIlg' Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:15 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # I Response 101 First Name Tina Last Name Bain Spouse First Name R. Clark Spouse Last Name Bain Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 51 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 20,18,16,14,4,3, Address 5812 Amy Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email thefoodpalette @aol.com First Name i IJohn Last Name �Spanhake Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) I 2 i Average age of adults 42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) �1 102 I Age of Children 8 Address i 5701 McGuire Rd. City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email i john.spanhake @iphouse.com 103! First Name _.._..__.._° Kathryn http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 �� Zoornerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 10 Last Name Thorndyke Spouse First Name Keith Spouse Last Name same Taxpayers/Voters in Household 3 Children in Edina Schools W 2 Address 5609 Hillside Court City Edina State 1 MN I zip 155439 Email kthorn0l@aol.com First Name Andrea Last Name Moonen Taxpayers/Voters in Household 12 Average age of adults i30 Children in Edina Schools 104; Age of Children : 2 & soon to be born Address 15715 Tracy Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email andrea@jadetcm.com .............. . . .. I... - ---- -- First Name Tyler Last Name Christopherson Spouse First Name 1 Kyle Spouse Last Name Christopherson Taxpayers/Voters in Household 2 Average age of adults 105 35 Children in Edina Schools W 2 Age of Children 2 yrs old, 4 months old Address 5833 Eastview Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55436 http://app.zoomerang.com/Report/PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx?print—all= 6/24/2010 (S ) Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 10 Email tcchristopherson @ gmail.com First Name j Mark Last Name 'Evenson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) ;1 Average age of adults ;31 306; Address 6304 Hillside Rd i City I Edina State MN Zip '55436 Email mevenson @carlsonprint.com 'First Name Ruth Last Name i Kewitsch Spouse First Name 1 Wayne Spouse Last Name Kewitsch Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 44 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 107 Age of Children 14, 12, 9 Address 5624 Doron Drive j City i Edina i State iMN Zip i 55439 Email ; rkewitsch @gmail.com Spouse's Email iwkewitsch @gmail.com j First Name Judith I Last Name Rodgers Spouse First Name i William Spouse Last Name Rodgers 108 ' Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) two Average age of adults 55 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 ! Age of Children 17 Address 6100 Arbour Lane http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 5` Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 10 city Edina State j Minnesota Zip 55436 Email j jbr62 @earthlink.net Spouse's Email judith .rodgers @wayzata.kl2.mn.us First Name Susan Last Name j Clark Spouse First Name I Chip Spouse Last Name Howard j Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) i 13 i Average age of adults 40 , Children in Edina Schools ( #) 109 0 Age of Children 22 Address 5812 W 61st Street City Edina State �MN Zip 55436 Email jhoward6l2@comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email jhoward612 @comcast.net First Name William Last Name Rodgers Spouse First Name 'William Spouse Last Name Rodgers Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 155 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 110 i Age of Children 17 Address 6100 Arbour Lane City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email jbr62 @earthlink.net Spouse's Email _'jbr62@earthlink.net http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 �� Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Pet - ition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 10 Other Adult Member's Email jbr62@earthlink.net Other Adult Member's Email jbr62@earthlink.net . . ................. ...... First Name Bert Last Name Finsand Spouse First Name Amy Spouse Last Name Finsand Taxpayers/Voters in Household 14 I Average age of adults 50 Children in Edina Schools Age of Children 17 ;111i Address 6404 Limerick Drive City Edina State MN Zip 1 '55439 Email bert@finsand.com Spouse's Email amy.finsand@buckconsultants.com I Other Adult Member's Email finsand@bc.edu Other Adult Member's Email meredithfinsand2013@u.northwestern.edu . ... . . .. . ..... . ................... . .... . .. ........ . . .... .... ......... .. .. . .... ............ ... ... ... ............. . ....... . .. . . .. ..... .............. ........ . ........... .......... . ... . . First Name David i 'Last Name Bremer Spouse First Name 'Tianyi Spouse Last Name Bremer 'Taxpayers/Voters In Household 6008 Average age of adults 54 112 I Children in Edina Schools 10 Address 6008 Grove Circle City Edina State MN Zip .55436 Email bremerda@comcast.net First Name 3an 113 Last Name Bergren Taxpayers/Voters in Household 2 http://app.zoomera*ng.com/Report/PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx?print—all= 6/24/2010 Zoornerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 10 Children in Edina Schools 0 Age of Children 20, 24 Address 5037 Yvonne Terrace City Edina State MN Zip 155436 First Name lack Last Name :Hughes Spouse First Name I Pamela Spouse Last Name ,Hughes Taxpayers/Voters In Household 2 Average age of adults !62 114; Children in Edina Schools M 0 Address 5850 Creek Valley Road City I Edina State :MN Zip 55439 Email jjf07O445@yahoo-com . ...... . ....... . .......... . ... First Name Judith Last Name Harvey Spouse First Name Paul Spouse Last Name Harvey Taxpayers/Voters in Household 14 Average age of adults 42 Children in Edina Schools 115;1 Age of Children 15 'Address 6608 Naomi Drive j city Edina i State MN Zip .55439 Email judiharv@hotmaii.com First Name 116 kathleen Last Name dahlheimer http://app.zoomerang.com/Report/PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx?print—all= 6/24/2010 (5) Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 10 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 Children in Edina Schools ( #) j0 Address 4801 west 60th street City edina State mn Zip 55424 Email KDahlheimer @comcast.net i First Name i 1John j Last Name Huseby Spouse First Name Nancy Spouse Last Name Huseby Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) l2 Average age of adults 46 117 Children in Edina Schools ( #) i Address 5904 Arbour Ave city Edina State iMN Zip 155436 Email hobiz @comcast.net Spouse's Email nobiz @comcast.net _ First Name ' Eric Last Name Barnum Spouse First Name i i Wendy Spouse Last Name Barnum i I Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 f Average age of adults 118 Children in Edina Schools ( #) ;0 Age of Children 9 and 7 Address 6113 Arbour Lane City Edina )State 'MN Zip '55436 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print —all= 6/24/2010 d Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 10 Email we4barnum@comcast.net First Name Pam Last Name Rochlin Spouse First Name David 'Spouse Last Name Roch l i n Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) :2 Average age of adults 46 119. Children in Edina Schools ( #) Age of Children 13,12,9 Address 5704 View Lane city Edina ! i State MN Zip '55436 Email pamr @rochlinlaw.com i First Name j Kevin Last Name I McCoy Spouse First Name Anne Spouse Last Name ! McCoy Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 47 j Children in Edina Schools ( #) ! (2 ! Age of Children 120 11 & 13 Address 5809 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email kmccoy2 @comcast.net Spouse's Email annemccoy@comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email na Other Adult Member's Email na First Name Sally 121 Last Name Mays Spouse First Name _..._.__. Gary http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ai l= 6/24/2010 9 Zoornerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! 0:. 9-of 10 Spouse Last Name Mays Taxpayers/Voters in Household 4 Average age of adults 4 Children in Edina Schools 0 i Ageof Children 21+ Address, 5529 Countryside Road City Edina 'State MN zip 55436-2503 'Emall techlms@gmail.com, I First Name I,burton Last Name shatter Spouse First Name beverly Spouse Last Name shatter 'Taxpayers/Voters in Household 2 Average age of adults 73 i 122 Children in Edina Schools 0 Address 5800 arbour avenue I I City edina State mn Zip ,55436 Email bbshacter@comcast.net i Spouse's Email bbshacter@comcast.net . . . .... ......... First Name Roy, Last Name Burns Spouse First Name Allene Spouse Last Name 123 j Burns Taxpayers/Vot(irs in Household '2 Average age of adults .78 Children in Edina Schools 10 Spouse's Email alleneburns@msn.com First Name 124 Allene Last Name Burns http://app.zoomerang.com/Report/PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx?print—all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 10 Spouse First Name Roy Spouse Last Name i Burns Taxpayers/Voters in Household 2 Average age of adults 78 Children in Edina Schools M 0 Address 5708 Warden Ave 1 city Edina State Mn. Zip l 55436 Email 1 alleneburns@msn.com Spouse's Email roybburns@msn.com . . ... .... . . Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums @ 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http://app.zoomerang.com/Report,TrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx?print—all= 6/24/2010 C(e3 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 2 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & W zoom a ra n g- Survey! Results overview Date: 6 /23/2010 9:12 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 3. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group opposes the final rezoning and development j plans for this project as submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals will irrevocably alter the character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot, for - profit apartment complex being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale commercial activity. The resulting commercial activity will disrupt forever the !tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be j commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building - i.e., 139 units, three stories, forty-four feet high and six hundred feet (two I football fields) in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The only buildings of similar mass and scope are Valley View Middle School, and the apartment building would be three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic i character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one point we want to make very clear: the Countryside Neighborhood Group is not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In fact, we believe that senior housing is a good i idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Our main objection, as has been j repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. The Church and Developer + has stated it cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically viable. The residents strongly reject this conclusion based on existing projects built, or soon to be built, by Shelter Corporation. We feel that a smaller, project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation enter into continued dialogue with the neighborhood as co- stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that respects the needs of the Residential Countryside Neighborhood. # ; Response _ j I don't mind a smaller assisted living facility as the group is recommending, but I am still concerned about the precedent being set if it is a for - profit enterprise. It should be non - profit or not - for - profit, especially if 1 associated with the church. Traffic is a second concern - getting off of 62 onto Tracy is already hard enough. And many students take this route to and from middle and high school. I don't believe I want to see traffic lights at the intersection, but some improved bike /pedestrian crossing would be good. 2 i the two opposing groups need an arbitrater to aid the negotiation This whol thing is much too large for this perfect neighborhooe. I have been here or 53 yeaars..Do not ruin 3 itlll http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpen.EndedResponsesPage. aspx ?print —all= 6/23/2010 Q Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 2 This project is completely out of character for this area. It is not harmonious with Nine Mile Village and it 4 j would set an extremely harmful precedent. I am particularly concerned about the traffic impact. The exits from route 62 onto Tracy Ave. are currently 5 I dangerous and often backed up. I am skeptical of the traffic study done. The original draft failed to include the impact of traffic from the high school; the revised version indicated that the high school had no impact, { which is absurd to anyone who has observed Tracy Av. traffic between 3 and 5 on weekdays. 6 j And the city of Edina needs to allow us to VOTE on rezoning and NOT take it upon themselves to assume what is right for me /my neighborhood 7 1 The scope of the proposed development is out of character with the rest of the neighborhood. 8 I Recommend that the city not permit the zoning change at all for this purpose and act within its charter to protect the citizens it represents rather than outside special interests. 9 I A smaller project would be less susceptible to vacancies, less traffic and less stress on the area's I environment and infrasructure Set a precedent for working together for an ihtergenerational NEIGHBORHOOD of appropriate size.shape for ! 10 I benefit of all. The project belongs on York Avenue or France Avenue which have already been ruined by overdevelopment it of what were once true neighborhoods. My children went to school, played sports and biked with friends in the Countryside neighborhood. Don't spoil the neighborhood. j 12 We Cannot stand Edina's city planners who are trying to "URBANIZE" our city! We demand that you retain our "SUB" -urban neighborhoods! We don't need any more High Density developments spoiling our lives! 13 I We don't need another retirement living quarters in Edina ... there are many that are not currently full occupancy — -- - - - - - -- - - -- We are asking the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Edina to deny the request for 14 i rezoning of the property for the 139 unit apartment project. The Countryside neighbors should not be forced to deal only with Shelter Corporation and the business interests of Colonial Church. Edina city officials should be respecting, valuing and representing our concerns. I WOULD LIKE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL TO REJECT THE APPLICATION AS PRESENTED AND WORK WITH THE RESIDENTS, SHELTER CORP. AND COLONIAL CHURCH TO DESIGN A 1 15 SENIOR LIVING COMPLEX THAT FITS THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MAYOR CONSISTENTLY SAYS HE WANTS TO BE FAIR AND THE ABOVE REQUEST HELPS HIM MEET THIS GOAL. Products & Services I About Us ! Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums © 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: / /app.zoomerang.r,om/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ ali= 6/23/2010 a Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page I of 2 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & zoomerang" Survey! Results overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:17 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 14. Please express any other thoughts or concerns you may have: # i Response . ........ ... ......... . . .... ...... . . .... 1 am most concerned about the zoning change. This area is zoned residential and should remain residential. that allowed this to happen. I From personal experience, I have seen what happens in s community purchased a townhome Eagan a year ago that my daughter lives in to be close to the college she attends. buildings (one is for seniors only), three block radius, town homes, apartment build Eagan has allowed within a single family homes, and businesses . It is not an ideal area to live in so therefore the townhome was cheap, t of families. ( many hav e lost or are losing there homes because of I the taxes are cheap, and there are lot mile per hour speed limit. Is this the future for this foreclosers). The traffic is terrible and roads have a 4 area of Edina? The increased traffic to a large apartment building will make this area of Edina less attractive. Homes will lose value, tax es will go down, lower income families will move in as current home owners move to more desirable communities that may n ot be in Edina. I do not want to see this happen. I have lived her for most of my 61 years. I plan on remaining in my home as long as I am able. I enjoy may yard, Bredesen park, and the quiet community. opposed to this As a former Countryside neigborhood resident and a continuing Edina resident, I am very development. It will destroy the character of the entire area of Edina along Highway 62 between Valley View Road and Highway 169. This area currently feels park-like with protected single family residential dwellings. 1 2 1 This proposed massive structure will be incredibly in trusive to the area. If the project is allowed to move i i forward, I believe many of us will be ashamed that our fine city would permit such a radical violation of the to good community. Furthermore, the development process for this projec t has been exclusive and contrary government and community relations. 3 am also concerned with the tax increment financing that is proposed to be used for funding. - -- - ---- . ..... .. ---------------- . ...... ....... . -- ---- 4 i On top of SCOP - e and scale, I'm externely concerned about traffic and safety issues that this development will 1, create. 15 Just vote for people who want Edina to remain as it is. Change is not always better ..... 4I'm also very ncerned on the Very large traffic increase on Tracy Avenue. 6 ry — 1, — I the elected representatives of the city of edina have ignored t he interests of the voters in the countryside 7 area 8 this is exactly why people think government is worthless. And these peop le all seem to work in real estate. Isn't there a conflict of interest somewhere? Just an FYI based on some- information I received, there are some of the yard signs being removed/stolen 9 i from some supporters yards. We have had one that has gone missing, and I know of 2 in the Sunnyside neighborhood that were removed/stolen a few days ago. 10 ........... .........................thanks for all the hard work it I We are totally disgusted with Hovland's attitude and the Council majority trying to slip this miserable plan by the residents of Edina. We chose to settle in a residential neighborhood and don't want to have to move to a different location 12 capriciously change the zoning of a residential neighborhood. and/or different municipality that does not cap 13 1 live a block off of Tracy Ave and am very concerned about traffic since my kids will be crossing Tracy to go to school someday soon. I am also concerned this project . - - . . will fail . and t u r n - into HUD _.. housing. .... ... . . .................. I do not live in the Countryside neighborhood, but am extremely concerned about the precedent this is sett 14 !ing in Edina. i . ............ . . .. - concerned -about . . .. ........... . ................................. . .. .. .. . . ........ .... ............ . .... . http://app.zoomerang.com/Report/PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx?print—all= 6/23/2010 606 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 2 of those Traffic! While it is being built and after it has been co mopleted with 139 9 nhai care households. other needs that !, 15 i households will have doctor & dental appointments, g rY� pharmacy, will affect traffic in the area. I believe that the two primary reasons that the City officials are attempting to ramrod this insanely massive and inappropriate project through the approval process are; 1) Colonial Church is going broke and they to the church to replace the missing donations i needed to devise a scheme to bring a monthly flow of money 16 1 caused by the mass exodos of church members. 2) The City is short on funds and this project could bring in ose this substantial tax revenue on the backs of the neighborhood residents who adamently opp ! unacceptable project. City official have entered into an adversarial relationship with City residents and that j is disgusting. Our rights and opinions must be respected! I wish the Wayzata City Council could step in and protect my ne 17 i ighborhood. They had the backbone to say no" to a church to be built in a residential neighborhood. _ - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- -- - - 'i 18 ;Why are public funds being used for the financial benefit of a private religious institution. i I am very concerned that, if approved, this would set a bad precedent of "spot zoning" for all the R -1 zoned 19 areas of the City. Also, FYI, our MAILING address is Ray &Lois Voss 5021 Vernon Ave. So. #312 - Edina, MN ' 155436 - - - - -- - - i 20 I Help us understand just who the city council and staff are working for in even allowing this manipulation of I _! our zoning, planning, and protections j ction traffic would cause. Teucks often cut about hrough Vernon/Tracy acyiAvenue frlom highway 100. The tadd'tional noisie and air 21 Pollution this project would create need to be addressed. Please have trucks banned from cutting through the neighborhood; use Crosstown. - - 22 I Aletter has been sent to the Planning Commission and City Council by both my husband and myse . 23 I I have written letters to be sent to all on the list _ _._-- _— _- . - - - -- - - - - - -- -�The amount of traffic on Tracy Avenue will increase exponentially because there are no gas stations / 24 ! grocery stores / restaurants closer than 50th an , Vernon. - - -- - - -- ! � Impacts on environment,traffic,safety, noise pollution, city infrastructure, neighborhood ambience. TOO 1 25 LARGE a complex is forbidding INSIDE as well as OUTSIDE. _ Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums 0 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms of Use htto: / /app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/23/2010 C4 6- Zoornerang I Edina Electronic Petition & Survey! : (]— Page l of � Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & &Vzoomerang- Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/23/2010 e:14pm psr Responses: Completes ---------`---------' --------- - -----`-------------------------- -- ---- S. By completing and submitting this electronic petition and survey, l want my submission to �act asnny electronic signature. l agree nny feedback may be submitted to the City of Edina, so that City Leadership will understand the importance of my concerns on this important topic. # 'Response | sneaky exploitation. ! As a member of Colonial Church I voted against the sale of the land, as did the architect of the church and many other members. When the vote passed, we were presented with three options. I voted for what I .2 1 thought would be a facility that looked exactly like the church campus in design. Nothing was presented at i the time of the second vote to suggest the size and scope of this project. It is the design and scope that are i so objectionable to this area. 1 1 want my feedback submitted to the City of Edina, and to express my profound disappointment in the I manner that the city has dealt with this "project." i I am not fully opposed to the idea of a senior housing unit. I am opposed to the size and scale at what they 1 want to build. I have also heard rumblings that it would turn into section 8 housing. If this is the case, the 4 entire area's property values would be greatly effected. The surrent road system is in need of repair and would cost the city and tax payers more money to upgrade this for the increase traffic as well. As I see this, it is a lose lose for the residents of Coun'tryside Nieghborhood. I WOULD LIKE THE CITY COUNCIL TO EXPLAIN WHATERVER DECISION THEY COME UP WITH. I WOULD LIKE THEM TO STATE FACTS NOT OPINIONS. � Products uServices I About uo |mupport/*,|p | Zoomnrangrpmma @ 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use 6/23/20100 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 1 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Z p , �',#'' Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:11 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 2. I agree to have Dan Rasmus, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's attorney be my spokesperson at the public meetings. I agree and support the arguments he raises (in the following section): ..- - - - - -. — — - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- -- .._._.. _..- - - .._.. - - - -- .. -- i # i Response 1 I think Dan really needs to get tough on this and fight hard to prevent this - no Mr. Nice Guy, please! 2 1 all ?3 f4 5 Totally support the views taken by the group and the Rasmus letter. with the clarification provided below Keep up the good work!!lHTh When we moved to Edina 23 years ago, the residential, quiet characteristics of this neighborhood was the 6 I determining factor in our choice of place to live. We never anticipated that commercial enterprises would be allowed to become our neighbors. It is simply unfair, and probably illegal, to change the zoning and force I believe in representative democracy That means the Edina city Council must respresent voters and 7 taxpayers - -- Colonial church pays NO taxes and a majority of church members Do not live in Edina nor pay taxes here! 8 1 While I do not agree to have Mr. Rasmus speak for me, I agree with and support the positions below. j 9 1 Huge Traffic problems on tracy crossing 62 for pedestrians and bikes. heavy traffic on tracy to vernon. Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums m 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print —all= 6/23/2010 (O / Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page' l of 2 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & &W zo o m e ra ng- Su rvey! Results Overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:13 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 4. For households that share the same email address, select "Yes." Where you do not share the same email, select "No," meaning that your husband, wife, partner, roommate, or other family member(s) do not share the same email, and you will all be submitting this petition and survey individually. If you share the same email address in your household, please specify who you share your email with in the additional comment section, it would be very helpful if you I would please complete another survey under their name too so we can easily summarize their opinion too. If you share the same email, and you only want to fill out his petition /survey I once, please indicate in the comments section below; ONCE, and indicate SHARE same i responses. And indicate we have PERMISSION to count the number of responses for you and ! all the other adults in _..... I .............._..._.._._........ ...._._....your household. _ .......... ... ....... .._ ................... _ # iResponse 11 ! Tim & Leah Kuck 2 i Wife, Barbara Fraboni i j3 Annette -- - - -- - - - -- 4 ONCE SHARE PERMISSION 5 j once share permission granted 6 Spouse, share, count as two responses _... - - -- -- .. _..... ... _. . 7 Share responses and permission to count for all adults in household 8 j Once, Share same responses. You have my permission to count the number of responses for you and all the other adults in my household. 9 1ONCE SHARE PERMISSION 1 10 once and share the same response 11 Once. Share same responses. .... 12 , Bill & Judy Johnson share the home email address given as the contact email 13 ! share responses with spouse, Steve (shares this address) 14 I Please count this petition for both Phil Bohrer and Jean MCDowall. - - -- - - - -- -- — — ............... ..... - - _ ...._ _........_...... --- ........... _- ......... __- _ ....... I 15 ONCE... SHARE... PERMISSION GRANTED 16 j share same responses and have permission to count us as 2 17 kris j I 18 Do not send e-mail I 19 Once. Share responses. 20 1 Myself & Spouse Please count this survay twice (for both of us) 21 i Once /Share. You have our permission to count my husband and myself. 22 � SHARE I- - - ....-. . . .. . - 23 I Share email address with George Edmonson http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/23/2010 (ID Zoomerang I Edina Electronic Petition & Survey! : {)— Page 2nf2 � Stephanie Rhodv. We are only filling out the survey once. You have nw permission to share the same �^— responses for mvspouse. 25 ONCE, SHARE, PERMISSION Products &aemicns | About uo | Support/Help | opomo,a`sFn,wno C 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc- All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use 1/21/2111 e Zoomerang |Bdbna Electronic Petition & !:C)— 'Page lofl Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & ��^��� ��^� r�� /� N�^ ��ur ��U --- Results overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:16 pm PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 8. Would you be willing to speak during --'-----'------- --------------------------'--------------------- the three minute Community Comment Section o[the public meetings? If you desire, we will assist you in writing the question or comment that you would like to make. # |Response _ � my colleges will speak onmv oenu" 2 1 will be out of the country until mid-July; my - ~-------- —'----��� wife is handicapped and unable to attend the meetings. 3 would also be willing to give my time to Dan if allowed. 4 If you need speakers, please let me know. 15 11 will not need help. I will speak with logic and emotion and from common sense. 10 1 See mv above comment | 17 for meetings I am in town. I am willing, if needed. But, tell me which of the many issues will best be clarified and/or supported by my ing the same concerns. words. Countryside neighbors have been accused by City representatives of repeat � " In my opinion that should be an indication that more than one person is impacted and troubled by that / � issue. However, to be precise, let's be sure each is raised by the most effective witness. / 9 1 YOU vvouuouxsMsTu DISCUSS. rp YOU HAVE SPEAKING POINTS om ! I THE cOmCeam SHARE THEM WITH ns BEFORE THE mseTImo. Products aServices | About ua |oupportoHop | Zunmoranspvrumo C 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I PrivacyPollcy I TermsOfUse alh~ 1• Jonathan Vlaming Three .Rivers Pat-k District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth MN 55441 -1299 June 7, 2010 Re: Objection to Community Assessment Process Dear Mr. Vlaming, The members of the Community Assessment Team ( "CAT ") who have signed this letter are writing to protest the process "Three Rivers Park District has used to obtain input from the residents of Edina on the proposed Regional Trail System. As you know, CAT is comprised of l i representatives (and others) electedby the residents of each trail segment originally proposed as possible routes for the trail. We are volunteers who have devoted substantial time and effort to provide ideas and facts to the Park District. We understand that that information will be submitted to the City Council to be considered in the Council's decision on whether and where such a trail system will be located. As a result of recent actions by the Park District we believe that the integrity of the process of gathering ideas and information from and by CAT has been destroyed. As a result, we will not support or endorse any findings or conclusions made by the Park. District or submitted to the City Council unless the CAT is allowed to review all relevant information as promised and is granted further input. ".The most significant event that caused us to reach this conclusion is that the Park District changed the "rules of the game" after the game has been played but before the outcome has been decided. At the first meeting of CAT in December 2009, we were told that our role was to provide a list of "pro's" and "con's" (now called items) that the Park District would "quantify" anyd submit to the City Council. We were expressly told that we could consider 2ply those routes identified on a map given to all of us. We were told we could not consider any other possible alternative routes. That directive was repeated at several meetings in response to our concerns for its limiting effect. Most recently, however, at our meeting on May 17, we were told that the Park District had developed a new, alternative route (route 5F) that had never been given to us for consideration before. It had never appeared on any prior map, and, to the best of our knowledge, no citizen representative had ever been given opportunity for input. We believe that the new route has not been evaluated environmentally and will not appear in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet under preparation. Many of us have other objections to the Park District's process that will be addressed by individual CAT members. Because of this change in the process, and other, more individual reasons, we believe that the results of this process cannot be fair and representative of the Citizens of Edina's concerns. Therefore,-we will not endorse anv submission by the Park District resulting from the propss as is. (D We are committed to bringing forward a fair framework in which to reach a conclusion desired by the residents of Edina. To that end; we feel that the CAT should not be disbanded but should continue to work with Tlb•ee Rivers Park District to consider all options. Cc: Mayor James. Hoyland and Edina City Council Three .Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners Richard Johnsoi 'Section I Robert Lubar Section 2 Robert Schwartzbauer Section 3 Reid Kilberg Section 4 Nve Henry Sectki �E 8& 7 Michael Wol, ection E i \Harvey J*son Section 9 Peter McCarthy Section I 1 Page 1 of 4 Dot Kerzner From: "Barbara Hoganson" <barbarahoganson @comcast.net> To: "'Barbara Hoganson "' < barbarahoganson@comcast.net>; "'Spencer Turner "' <turnersa12 @gmail.com >; <jbr62 @earth link. net >; <bljohnson2008 @comcast.net >; "'Kent Gravelle "' <kentg ravel le@g ravel lelaw.com >; "'Lawrence J Kerzner"' <Lawrence.Kerzner @hcmed.org >; <gjjohnson3 @comcast.net >; "'Christine Henninger "' < Christine .Henninger @genmills.com >; "'Dan Rasmus "' <drasmus @rasmuslaw.net >; <franzsr @aol.com >; "'Spence Turner "' <sturner12 @arvig.net >; "'burton <bbshacter @comcast.net >; "'STEPHEN + JESSICA BERG "' <ninetwenty @earthlink.net >; "John Harden" <JHarden @hardeninc.com >; <jhoward612 @comcast.net >; "'Kevin McCoy <kmccoy2 @comcast.net >; "'Anne McCoy "' <annemccoy @comcast.net >; "'John St. Pierre "' <john @stpierreassociates.com >; <dkerzner @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:17 PM Attach: 20100623092405208. pdf Subject: Three Rivers Bike Trail,73% oif Neighborhood(CAT) file formal complaint about due process used Look at John Keprios response below and the attachment of 8 or 11 Edina neighbors (CAT) involved in the process concerned about due process of it all. Thanks. From: John Keprios [mailto:JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:04 AM To: Barbara Hoganson Subject: RE: One neighbor's glance at the Countryside Park plans... Barbara: There are eight signatures on the letter. The CAT volunteers are understandably upset that the Three Rivers staff proposed alternate route 5F late in the process long after they told the volunteers that they would not be entertaining alternate routes during the CAT process. I believe that 5F was inevitable based on what Three Rivers staff have told me; however, I agree that the timing was bad. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios@ci.edina.mn.us "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs" From: Barbara Hoganson [ mailto :BarbaraHoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:17 PM To: John Keprios Subject: RE: One neighbor's glance at the Countryside Park plans... Hello John, I was very surprised to be informed by several of the CAT team members (of which I never knew, nor ever met before tonight's meeting) re the Edina Segment Bike Trail. I was there with an open mind to learn more as I CD6/23/2 Page 2 of 4 really didn't know how all of this came to be so quickly in this area. The CAT folks I spoke to shared they were very disappointed about the process, and the outcomes. I thought everyone was working together positively on this. They mentioned they had written a letter and many people signed it opposing the due process used for this CAT effort. I was curious to learn more and was hoping you could email me the letter they are referring to? Thanks, Barbara From: John Keprios [mailto:JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:17 PM To: John Harden Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: RE: One neighbor's glance at the Countryside Park plans... John Thank you for your email. I appreciate your comments. The hockey rink is proposed to be placed in the proper north/south orientation because it becomes the first rink in the City to lose its ice along the south facing boards. The size and type of warming is yet to be determined. The photo of the replacement is misleading. When funding is available, it is my intent to have a neighborhood committee help design a new warming house that fits the needs of the park, neighborhood and character of its surroundings. It may very well be similar to the new larger park shelter buildings at Weber and Cornelia School Park. Decomposition of organic matter under the ice is a problem at most of our outdoor skating rinks at the end of each skating season. That is the cause of the foul odor. It is difficult to build outdoor ice in a green manner on soils that don't emit those gases. Your suggestion to relocate the proposed regional trail is noted and I will share that comment with Three Rivers Park District. Funding has become a significant issue due to Minnesota State Legislature imposed levy limits and loss of Market Value Homestead Credit. Staff are asked to take voluntary furloughs; salaries are frozen; car allowances eliminated; full -time and part-time positions are being frozen or eliminated and services are being reduced. In other words, the timing of capital improvement plans for the entire park system is difficult to predict at this point due to available funding. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 ikeorios6bci.edina.mn.us "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs" 76 6/23/2010 Page 1 of 2 Dot Kerzner From: "Barbara Hoganson" < i nfo@edi nacou ntry side. com> To: "'Kent Gravelle "' <kentg ravel le@g ravel lelaw. co m> Cc: "'Dan Rasmus "' <drasmus @rasmuslaw.net >; "'Gordon + Jan Johnson "' <'gjjohnson3 @comcast.net.'>; < Christine .Henninger @genmills.com >; "'Joshua S "Sprague "' <joshs @cbburnet.com >; "'Bill Johnson "' <'bljohnson2008 @comcast.net5; "'burton <bbshacter @comcast.net >; "'Dot Kerzner"' <dkerzner @comcast.net >; "'Franz Burris <'franzsr @aol.com' >; "'John Harden "' <j. harden @comcast.net >; "'Spence Turner <sturner12 @arvig.net >; "'Bill Rodgers "' <jbr62 @earthlink.net >; "'Bill Johnson "' <bjohnson2008 @comcast.net >; <bljohnson2008 @comcast.net >; "' Christin Henninger < christine . hen ninger @genmills.com >; "'Dorothy M "Kerzner "' <dorkerzner @edina.k12.mn.us >; <gjjohnson3 @comcast.net >; "John Harden" <JHarden @hardeninc.com >; <josehanson @comcast.net >; <jst.pierre @comcast.net >; "'Larry Kerzner "' <lawrence.kerzner @hcmed.org >; "'Larry Kerzner "' <Ikerzner1 @comcast.net >; "'Larry Kerzner <Ikerzner @comcast.net >; <STURNER12 @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:03 AM Subject: RE: 9 -mile creek bike trail to be diverted to Olinger and Tracy How does everyone weigh in on this? From: Kent Gravelle [mailto :kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:25 PM To: Barbara Hoganson Cc: 'Dan Rasmus'; 'Gordon + Jan Johnson'; Christine .Henninger @genmills.com; Joshua S "Sprague; 'Bill Johnson'; 'burton'; 'Dot Kerzner'; 'Franz Burris'; 'John Harden'; 'Spence Turner'; Bill Rodgers; Bill Johnson; bUohnson2008 @comcast.net; Christin Henninger; Dorothy M' 'Kerzner; gjjohnson3 @comcast.net; John Harden; josehanson @comcast.net; jst.pierre @comcast.net; Larry Kerzner; Larry Kerzner; Larry Kerzner; STURNERI2 @comcast.net Subject: 9 -mile creek bike trail to be diverted to Olinger and Tracy Barbara, Per your request, I telephoned Reid Kilberg, 6012 Kilarney Lane, rakilberg@aol.com. By the way, Reid accepted our Save Countryside sign on the Gleason side of his property and I assume he is interested in receiving our emails. Reid Kilberg is on the community assessment team for the Three Rivers Park District's Edina segment of the proposed 9 -mile bike trail. Reid said that for a long time the plan has been for the bike trail to go under Gleason, through Bredesen Park, and then over highway 62 on a bridge which would then come out near the high school. The water table is allegedly too high to build a tunnel under 62 at that point. However, for the first time, Reid and the rest of the Edina community assessment team learned that the trail will go through Bredesen but then exit Bredesen at Olinger and follow the south side of Olinger Road and then the east side of Tracy. Unbelievably, the bike trail will then cross Tracy at the fire station and then cross 62 on the west side of an expanded Tracy Avenue. I mentioned to him that I have crossed Tracy on foot and that this route would be extremely dangerous. He agreed but then said that he thinks 2 groups of stoplights will be installed at Tracy to minimize the danger. Reid added that 500,000 people a year are expected to use the Edina portion of the bike trail and the cost of the project will be $30 million. Reid said that if we want to share our concerns we can meet with the Three Rivers Park District on June -7 6/20/2010 Page 2 of 2 22nd and June 30th, but that those meetings are not set in stone. I have attached their calendar which Reid emailed to me. The Three Rivers Park District is headquartered on Medicine Lake in Plymouth and Holly and I have ridden almost all of their trails in Eden Prairie, from Hopkins to downtown Minneapolis, and around and beyond Lake Minnetonka. However, if nominated, I do not know if I would be the best person to head our group in opposition to this proposed bike trail because I am generally in support of bike trails. I personally think the best solution is tunnels under 62 and then Tracy but I am certainly no engineer or hydrologist and perhaps it is true that it would be impossible to keep the tunnels dry, particularly in the spring. The next best solution would be a bridge over 62 as originally proposed but the trail would still have to cross Tracy at some point. Kent - -- On Tue, 5/18/10, info ,<info@edinacountryside.com> wrote: From: info <info @edinacountryside.com> Subject: FW: New message 31 in mailbox 39020 To: kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com Cc: "'Dan Rasmus "' <drasmus @rasmuslaw.net>, "'Gordon + Jan Johnson "' <'gjjohnson3 @comcast.net.'>, Christine. Henninger@genmills. com, "'Sprague, Joshua S "' <j oshs @cbburnet.com> Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2010, 11:02 AM Hello Kent. Would you like to call this gentleman and then determine what impacts we need to know about, and what we need to do to share our concerns? Once you know would you please communicate it to the larger Steering Committee Group? Please listen to his voice mail message attached. Thanks Barbara - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Voicemail System [mailto:vm @asterisk] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 10:00 AM To: Edina VM Subject: New message 31 in mailbox 39020 Edina VM, There is a new voicemail in mailbox 39020: From: " +19528362735" < +19528362735> Length: 1:28 seconds Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 07:59:31 AM Visit http: / /ivr.a- cti.com to check your voicemail with a web browser. (5D 6/20/2010 As to the parking: 1. This development should more correctly be handled under a PSR (Planned Senior Residence) zoning rather than the PRD -5 that Shelter Corporation is proposing. Their only purpose in going in this direction is that fewer parking stalls are required in PRD -5 than in PSR. 2. The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance Will require more than a 1 to 3 ration of parking stalls to sanctuary seats — perhaps a 1 to 2 ration can be speculated. 3. The current proposal from the Three Rivers Bike Trail group will remove parking on the south side of Olinger Boulevard next to the ball diamonds in Countryside Park. This will "force" the cars to park on Colonial Way or in the so- called common lot just to the west of the park. This will reduce the number of stalls usable by the church and by the proposed Waters Development. 4. We personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. No one knows how to assess the additional traffic that is likely to occur when the proposed bike trail is completed. A bicycle is as much of a vehicle as an automobile when passing around the site. %9 5. As the Section 850 ordinance is presently written it is woefully outdated and inadequate. Determining what is a proper relationship is subjective. However, we believe the proposed development to be an overwhelming intrusion on the single family neighborhood due simply to its bulk. We have no other structure that is the length of two football fields. The proposed development usurps much of the available open space and will cause the removal of a hill containing many trees. m mmiib" I. 7 J ANr3 •- Y� �, � � � l �,. t ttr �4 +a t t 5 Ji << %NMI) rllC� � A 1 1 W Following this note you will find the Revised Colonial Church and`Shelter „ Corporation Living-Waters Development Application dated May 28, 2010. There are 1,477* residential households.within the Countryside School District, the largest stakeholder impacted by the "Development Application, which is the only stakeholder that has not been listed in the Development Application in section, Under the Proposed senior housing community is well located and will be.a good neighbor. " It states that "The senior housing community is surrounded by Crosstown Freeway (south), the Edina Fire Station (east) Countryside Park (north), and Colonial Church (west)." It makes no mention of the 1,577 residential homes to the north, east, west which represents the Countryside Neighborhood. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is asking the Planning Commission . and the City Council to reject this application. * From the Edina Community Resource Center, First Floor of the Edina Community Center Building. THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING THEWATERS OF EDINA SENIOR LIVING' Proposed Senior Housing Community on the campus of Colonial Church May 28, 2010 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50`' Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Subject: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Dear Cary, Since the February 16'h City Council meeting, we have been working to modify the design the Waters Senior Living of Edina senior housing community in response to the City Council's comments as well as comments received from our neighbors. Based upon these comments, we made significant changes to the building design incorporating as much as we could without jeopardizing the financial feasibility of the senior housing community. With the revised design, we are requesting your approval of the rezoning, the Development Plan and the lot subdivision. We began the design revisions based on the comments made at the City Council meeting. In cooperation with Countryside Neighborhood, we held two neighborhood meetings on April 6`' and 8`h to listen to all of the neighbors comments: At each meeting over 125 neighbors attended and many of them provided their comments. On May 20`x' we met with Countryside Neighborhood representatives to show them the revised design. Our neighbors asked many questions and we answered all of them. In addition to the formal meetings, we had several informal meetings and conversations with Countryside Neighborhood representatives. We believe that the revised design responds to most of their comments and concerns. 85 Sign cant design changes: Included as Exhibit A are three exterior renderings of the senior housing community from across Countryside Park, from Colonial Church and from the south. Each rendering is shown with full vegetation and without The full vegetation is a representation of how the vegetation will look when the construction is completed. Most of the senior housing community's view will be blocked by the full vegetation. At the Planning Commission and City Council meetings we will also be showing you a SketchUp fly over. The following points highlight the four areas where there are significant design modifications: • Senior housing community reduced from 4 stories to 3 stories at grade The fourth floor was completely removed reducing the overall building height by eleven feet The building height to the peak of the main roof is 46 feet. The building height to the mid -point of the roof height is 38 feet Because the land elevation increases by twenty feet from west to east, it is important to also take building elevations into consideration. A comparative height illustration of the senior housing community with adjacent buildings and trees is attached as Exhibit B. The elevation of the top of the fire station is approximately 905 feet with the senior housing community's roof starting at an elevation of 898 feet or seven feet below the top of the fire station. If one was to lie on the fire station's roof and look at the senior housing community, you would see approximately half way up the roof. Most of the senior housing community will be lower than the existing adjacent trees that will be preserved along the pond and Colonial Way. • Number of units reduced to 139 from 150 and fewer larger units The removal of one floor required both the number of units to be reduced along with a reduction in the number of larger units. The number of units was reduced by 11. The original submission had 61 units being larger than one bedroom. The revised design has 41 units larger than one bedroom: The overall square footage has been reduced from 200,387 to 214,967. • Front of building modified to include more architectural features At the City Council meeting it was requested that the memory support / care suites eastern end of the building (toward the fire station) be redesigned. The eastern end has been redesigned and looks more residential. 86 -- -- - -- The front of the building has been redesigned to include two larger wings on opposite sides of the main entrance. These two wings break up the long front view of the senior housing community and adds to the architectural interest. • Roof redesigned to eliminate gables and to be a complete hip roof system which also looks more residential The initial roof design was a gable roof incorporating several gables which made the building look taller. The roof has been redesigned to eliminate all of the gables and to be a hip roof. Hip roofs are very traditional and look more residential. The pitches of the hip roofs are designed to complement the look of the adjacent Colonial Church campus. Reasons to support the Urouosed senior housing community: There are three basic reasons to support the proposed senior housing community: the senior housing meets several of Edina's broader community needs; the location is suitable for senior housing community that will become an asset to the neighborhood; and the senior housing community will be a great place for seniors to live. • The Waters Senior Living of Edina meets significant community needs o There is a need for more senior housing community in Edina • More than 10,000 Edina residents are older than 65, the highest percentage of seniors for a city in the metropolitan area • A market study by Larsen Allen shows a demand for over 700 units of senior housing community and over 450 units of memory support. o The senior housing community provides Edina residents an opportunity to remain in their community instead of having to relocate to Eden Prairie, Hopkins or other adjacent cities to find similar senior housing opportunities. o The creation of the senior housing community also helps recycle the housing- formerly occupied by the senior resident to new, younger families seeking to reside in the City of Edina o Seniors living at The Waters Senior Living of Edina will be able to age in place without having to move. as they need additional assisted living services. 0 o Experience from The Colony at Eden Prairie shows that 75% of the future residents either currently live within three miles of the site or their children do. • The proposed senior housing community is well located and will be a good neighbor o The senior housing community is surrounded by Crosstown Freeway (south), the Edina Fire Station (east), Countryside Park (north) and Colonial Church (west). o The access to the senior housing community will be off of Colonial Way which connects to an arterial street (Tracy Avenue) and then within one block to the Crosstown Freeway. o A very tall tree berm will be preserved blocking the view of the senior housing community from the west and northwest. The Fire Station and adjacent trees will block most of the view from the east The best view of the senior housing community will be across the 800 -foot wide Countryside Park and over the 40 -foot high trees along Colonial Way. This view is still a partially blocked view. o Two traffic studies recently provided by the Developer and the Edina Public Works Department's subsequent analysis of these studies confirm. that the traffic generated by the proposed senior housing community development will have a minimal impact on the existing roadway network. The 2009 average daily traffic count provided. by the City of Edina for Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way is approximately 7,730. The Transportation Impact Analysis by RLK in January o£ 2010 projected 437 daily trips related to the proposed Senior'Housi.ng Community. That projection was based upon 150 units which has since been reduced to 139 units so the number of daily trips will be closer to 400. The Transportation Impact Analysis also projected 32 weekday AM peak hour trips and 55 weekday PM peak hour trips. 'A vast majority of the daily trips occur during non -peak hours. o The post - development parking requirements of the senior housing community and Colonial Church combined will be exceeded by 40 %. Parking Requirements • Colonial Church o Maximum seating capacity of 857 requires 286 spaces (0 • Senior Housing Community 0 169 bedrooms requires 43 spaces 0 30 peak staffing requires 30 spaces 0 2 vehicles requires 2 spaces • Total parking requirement of 361 spaces ■ Parking Available • Colonial Church has 341 spaces • Senior Housing Community 0 90 garage stalls 0 73 surface parking 0 163 total spaces • Total Parking available of 504 spaces Available parking exceeds the parking requirement by 143 spaces o The 70 -foot high trees along Nine Mile Creek will be preserved with the 40 -foot high trees along Colonial Way to provide a green buffer to the senior housing community. When these trees leaf out each spring, most of the senior housing community will not be visible through the trees. o There will be no exterior flood lights illuminating the building. Rather, all parking lot lights will be shielded and focused toward the ground. Sidewalk lighting will also be focused toward the ground. o The senior housing community development's site design will mitigate water resource impact. The development will obtain approvals and permits from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and will incorporate a water retention pond, rain gardens, and a water detention storage plan for a 100 year storm event. The ground floor parking level of the senior housing community will be located above the 100 -pear flood elevation and will have no impact on the ground water table levels or area basement flooding during heavy rain falls. o A flora and fauna study was commissioned to be sure that no impact on rare or endangered species. RLK completed their study (Exhibit C) and found no rare or endangered species of flora or fauna on the site. o The design of the senior housing community by HGA, who also designed Colonial Church, will complement each other and be of similar award - winning architecture. is The Waters Senior housing community of Edina, a great place for Edina seniors to live o The Waters Senior Living of Edina is being designed to be the finest senior housing community in Edina with extensive communal areas, state of the art wellness focus, larger apartments, and a design complementary to Colonial Church. o The cost to incorporate the extensive communal areas — wellness areas, community rooms, bistro, library, and other common areas need to be spread over 139 units to be economically feasible. As the number of units is reduced, these amenities will be eliminated and the character of the senior housing community will diminish. o The senior housing community provides 24 -hour/ seven days a week on site professional nursing services that are tailored to meet each seniors needs. At least quarterly, professional nursing staff will meet with every senior resident via a wellness screen to determine if the individualized service plan should be modified. These higher levels of nursing costs need to be spread over more units to keep the costs to the seniors as reasonable as possible. o Similar new construction, high amenity, high quality senior housing community in the metropolitan area is also sized to be economically feasible. • Colony at Eden Prairie —142 units plus 25 beds of Transitional Care • Summit Place in Eden Prairie — 265 units • St Therese in Hopkins — 313 units • Castle Ridge / Broadmoor by Presbyterian Homes — proposed to be 321 units in Eden Prairie (approved by the City Council) • Wayzata Bay Redevelopment by Presbyterian Homes — 247 senior housing community units Waverly Gardens by Presbyterian Homes in North Oaks — 233 senior housing community units ■ Trillium Woods in Plymouth proposed to be 209 units ■ Centennial House by Ecumen in Apple Valley —148 units High-view Hills by Walker Methodist in Lakeville —155 units ■ Proposed senior housing community by The Goodman Group in Chaska —150 units ■ The to be constructed senior housing community by The Waters Senior Living in Minneapolis is part of a senior housing community complex consisting of a 225 bed nursing home and a to be built 77 unit assisted living community. o The financial forecasts of the new senior housing community are based upon current rents and expenses from the Colony at Eden Prairie and thereby are realistic and financially viable. Zoninrelated items yet to be approved by The Citv of Edina In February, the City Council approved the modification of the Comprehensive Plan to allow for the proposed senior housing community. There remains three basic actions for the senior housing community to proceed: a rezoning, a Development Plan and a lot sub division. • Rezoning to Planned Resident District 5 — Rest Homes, Convalescent Homes and Nursing Homes • This type of zoning is the best suited for senior housing communities which include assisted living, memory, support and care suites. The entire building will be registered for housing with services. • NO variances requested • The following zoning requirements are complied with or exceeded — per Edina Planning report • Building and parking lot set backs are larger than the zoning standards • Proximity to R -1 single family home zoning district exceeds the minimum requirement of 170 feet by two times toward Tracy Avenue and over four times toward Olinger Boulevard. • Building coverage of the site is less than the maximum by 33 %. • Building massing is less than the maximum by 30 %. • Parking requirements are exceeded by over 143 spaces or by 40 %. • Landscaping guidelines require 54 trees and a full complement bf shrubs. Landscape plan greatly exceeds the.minimum. The proposed landscaping plan includes over 200 trees and over 300 bushes. • There is no maximum building height requirement in this zoning classification • This zoning allows only senior housing community. • The application is included as Exhibit D. i • Development Plan o This document details the senior housing community development to be sure that what is built is consistent with the City Council approvals. o As part of the Development Plan, we are requesting that this senior housing community have the Park Dedication Fee waived consistent with the waivers granted to the last two senior housing developments approved in Edina for the Ebenezer Society and Gramercy Cooperatives. The average age of the senior resident will be in the mid 80s and it is unlikely that they will avail themselves of Edina's parks. Instead, there are significant common areas for the seniors inside the building such as wellness areas, a therapy pool, community rooms, a library and other park- like areas. The cost of incorporating these park -like areas within the building greatly exceeds what the Park Dedication Fee would be. o The application is included as Exhibit E. • Property subdivision • The land is currently owned by Colonial Church of Edina. The senior housing community land needs to be subdivided. • The application is included as Exhibit F. We have worked very- diligently over the last several months to listen to suggestions to modify our proposed senior housing community. We incorporated many of those comments, as well as comments from our team, to make the senior housing community better without jeopardizing its financial viability. We believe that in a few years when the senior housing community becomes the new home to many Edina seniors, it will be seen as a valuable Edina asset and a good neighbor. Thank you for your consideration of our requests. Please call Jay Jensen at 952 -358 -5110 or e -mail at jav ,cie sheltercorp.com with any questions. Sincerely, 9jayn• Waters Senior Living - 01-1 Ted Y Colp}iial�Church of Edina i 9 The Waters Senior Living of Edina Submitted by The Waters Senior Living List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exterior Renderings of The Waters Senior Living of Edina Exhibit B Comparative Height Illustration Exhibit C Flora and Fauna Study Exhibit D Final Rezoning Permit Application Exhibit E Final Development Plan Application Exhibit F Subdivision Application t F i i a 93, I 0.. { 9 � All 0 '�j 8f WA�t} TL •7 olYl RTf -ITA _�� {" F, .- :Pmpos I., - 00 7 G Lff -- Nv Ne-11/fi-�vf Ll�.lti �G7'u` CX ST. LOUIS R PARK t4 N.�nn�a s SrYry P, ' 1. s EDiNA 169 .� EDEN 212 ��� 10 PRAiR[E 4. x ,e usw _ MSP tirymt kA {i MAma1C'a VIA Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Colonial Development Planning Process 2.1 Site Identification 2.2 Development Information 2.3 Zoning 2.4 Church Participation 3.0 Project Review 3.1 Site Strengths 3.2 Project Progress 3.3 Project Goals 3.4 Desired Developer Contributions /Commitments 3.5 Church Contributions /Commitments 4.0 Submission Requirements and Selection Procedures 4.1 Desired Qualifications 4.2 Submission Requirements 4.3 Timetable 4.4 Questions and Further Information List of Appendices • City Map, Figure 1 • Aerial Photo — Colonial Campus & Development Site, Figure 2 • Preliminary Illustrative Concept Plan, Figure 3 • Aerial Photo with Survey Overlay, Figure 4 • Survey, Figure 5 • Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report (available upon request) • Land Use Task Force Members, Figure 6 "O� (95)- 1.0 INTROD UCTION Colonial. Church of Edina (the "Church ") is soliciting responses for .this Request for Proposal (RFP). to develop 5 +/- acres of undeveloped, land on its campus. This property is,.located at 6200 Colonial Way ih'�Ed na, off Highway 62 /The Crosstown at the Tracy Avenue Exit. In 1977 the Church acquired the property and developed 'a majority of the parcel to serve as the new location for the Church. The'undeveloped land has been limitedly used for. parking and is' located in the southeast corner of the Church campus. The Church has appointed a Land Use Task: Force (LUTF), comprised of Colonial members, to recommend,the best use of this undeveloped portion of the Church's property. Colonial Church wishes to determine the highest and best use for its remainder land to maximize its economic opportunities and its ministry and to further enhance its legacy. The LUTF has concluded that some form of low to medium density multi - family housing is the most appropriate use of this excess parcel. Appropriate uses may include but not be limited to affordable or market - rate housing, and would include, but not be limited to the care or service of seniors, special needs groups or other multi - family. populations. The Church seeks a development partner to help finance,, design, build, and operate (if applicable) a multi - family housing project or mixed. use project on this unutilized parcel. The LUTF is contacting a select group of developers who have' a proven record of quality developments to request submission of a proposal for development of this property. Note: In addition to this invited group of developers, non -LUTF members of the Congregation may request others,.to respond to this RFP. The selection process for the developer partner will -be a multi -step process. The first step. (Step 1) is „this Request for Proposal (RFP). The next step (Step 2) will be an informational meeting: on October 11, 2007 whereby any interested _development partner would ask questions of the LUTF and sharpen their understanding of the proposed development. The third step (Step 3) is.the submission of the proposal and presentation to a joint meeting of the LUTF and the Church Council. The anticipated fourth step (Step 4) is a recommendation by the LUTF and Church Council of a proposal (with the possibility of up to.three proposals) for presentation to the entire Congregation. The recommended proposal .(s) 96 would then be presented to the Congregation for approval and selection (if multiple projects are brought forward). 2.0 COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA PLANNING PROCESS 2.1 SITE INFORMATION The development site is approximately 5 acres of the 19 +/- church campus. The site occupies the southern most portion of the campus. The southern boundary is Highway 62, the western boundary is a wetland land complex that is a part of Nine Mile Creek, the northern boundary is Colonial Way and the eastern boundary is the City of Edina Fire Station No. 1. Currently one third to one half of the site is used for parking and the balance is heavily treed with a storm water pond/wetland on its western edge. 2.2 DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION The Colonial Church of Edina Land Use Task Force is overseeing the development activities of this project. Soil test, survey and other information is available on www.colo iialchurch.org 2.3 ZONING The property is currently zoned R -1 single family residential. In order to facilitate construction of the development plan, the site will need to be rezoned. The City of Edina's Zoning Map is available at http: / /www.ci.edina.mn.us . Members of the LUTF have had conversations with the City of Edina regarding rezoning. Obviously any decision on rezoning is subject to a public hearing process and Council approval. 2.4 CHURCH PARTICIPATION LUTF has reviewed the various alternatives and has eliminated the following land uses as being inconsistent with the LUTF's charge or 'incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood; commercial, industrial, office, or retail. Development of upper end single family residences was also eliminated as being inconsistent with the mission of the Church. The LUTF has prepared a medium density residential plan attached as FIGURE 3 which is more representative of an acceptable land use. Any successful development proposal will need to be consistent with the overall campus plan and will need to 97 conform to Colonial's design guidelines and should extend the mission of the Church. 3.0 PROJECT REVIEW 3.1 SITE STRENGTHS The development site has many positive attributes including; Connection to the people of Colonial Church and the Colonial Campus Excellent access to Highways 62 & 100 Excellent visibility to Highway 62 Just across the street from park and recreation facilities Adjacent to 911 emergency services Close proximity to Retail Centers, Medical Complexes and Schools Close proximity to Downtown Minneapolis,(9 miles) Nine Mile Creek adjacent to the site Engaged and committed Church Council and Colonial Church Foundation — investing money through the development process on studies and plans. Existing residential base that would be interested in "staying in" Edina City of Edina is committed to adding additional senior and or affordable housing I qy 3.2 PROJECT PROGRESS The Church Council has created and charged the LUTF with presenting development options for the development site that are consistent with the Council's charge statement. The LUTF members consist of both; lay leadership and Church staff. LUTF members bring expertise in construction, development, architecture, finance, law, accounting, faith based programming and administration. A list of the task force members is attached as FIGURE 6. • LUTF has secured a survey and geotechnical information a copy of which is available upon request at www.colonialchurch.org . 3.3 PROJECT GOALS The project's goals are to better steward the Church's resources by generating income and providing a reliable and reoccurring source of funds to extend the outreach of Colonial's missions and to further enable the Church to reach, assimilate, engage and deploy people to serve the Lord. 3.4 DESIRED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS /COMMITMENTS The Church desires a developer for the development project. The developer: • Will be responsible for implementing a strategy to carry out the Development Plan. • Must demonstrate an understanding of how to integrate the new development into the Colonial campus and surrounding community incorporating a pedestrian focus, with cohesive design elements, adequate crossover parking and green space that compliment the Colonial Campus. • Must demonstrate an understanding and commitment to the Colonial Church of Edina's concept for development. • Will retain, at it sole cost and expense, its own consultants for architecture and other supporting work. • Must demonstrate the experience necessary to organize and deliver a high quality project of the type and scale proposed. • Developer will provide 100% of the capital to fund all project costs including but not limited to; construction, soft costs, and financing. • Is expected to be responsible for the management and capital requirements for the operation and the management of the property. 3.5 CHURCH CONTRIBUTIONS & COMMITMENTS The Colonial Church of Edina owns the proposed development site and may subordinate the Fee Ownership of the site if satisfactory protection is provided. Additionally, the Church has paid for a survey and a preliminary geotechnical study. The Church has also invested significant money into improvements that support the Colonial Campus and would also support the project as well. These improvements include but aren't limited to; sanitary sewer, water, streets, storm water retention and ponding and landscaping. The Church is receptive to cooperative, mutually- benefiting financial arrangements through such tools including Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and Tax Abatement or other forms of assistance that could be available to a proposed project. /aQ 4.0 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND SELECTION PROCEDURES 4.1 DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS • Experience in development of residential projects including the proposed. • Proven organizational and management capabilities. • Demonstrated experience in obtaining debt and equity to finance the proposed type of development. • Experience in public /private development work and partnerships. • Commitment to collaborate with Church staff, Church Council, LUTF members, planning consultants, and congregation members. 4.2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Please submit twelve (12) hard copies and 1 PDF electronic copy with the following information: 1. A development strategy including the number, type, size, estimated market value, and use for the project. 2. A preliminary site plan that indicates how the developer would propose to situate general uses on the site. The preliminary site plan should be conceptual in nature, simple diagrams (to scale), subject to further refinement based on forthcoming data and other appropriate investigations. This RFP does not anticipate and discourages architectural drawings with elevations specific to the site at this time. However, pictures of similar work done for other projects are welcomed. 0 3. The proposal may comment on any deviation from the RFP and discuss concerns about the Church's development and design objectives. The proposal may include alternative uses for the Church's consideration. 4. Proposed sale prices /rents of residential units and, proforma operating projections. 5. Generalized development proforma, detailing sources and uses of funds (including proposed value of land, construction costs, and soft costs). 6. Description of ownership structure and proforma including revenues, mortgage payments and cash flow distributions. 7.'A description of the project team. Include details of any proposed ownership: general, limited or joint venture partners, cooperative or cohousing ownership, charitable trust arrangements; etc. Resumes and relevant prior experience should be provided for all members. All principals and partners must be disclosed and pertinent information provided. 8. Summary of related development experience, financing and' references from City officials in at least two (2) communities where you have completed similar developments. 9. Description of unique characteristics and design elements that would be incorporated in the project. Pictures of,similar projects / oZ completed in other cities may be provided. 10. Proposed timeline for development. The 12 hard copies and 1 PDF electronic copy on disk, of the proposal, shall be sent to: Colonial Church of Edina ATTN: Ted Yoch, Chair Land Use Task Force 6200 Colonial Way Edina, MN 55436 4.3 TIMETABLE The selection process will follow the timetable outlined below. REP Distributed; September 13, 2007 Informational Meeting; October 11, 2007 Submittal of Response to RFO Due; December 12, 2007 LUTF /Church Council Review of Proposals; January, 2008 LUTF /Council Interviews Finalist; February, 2008 Finalist Proposals submitted to the Congregation; March, 2008 Developer Selection; April, 2008 The above time frames are estimates only, and are subject to change. 4.4 QUESTIONS AND FURTHER IN FORMATION You may contact any of the LUTF individuals listed below with questions. 1.) Ted Yoch (952) 278 -0790 tedyoch@aracontent.com 2.) Bill Beard (952) 930.0630 billb@beardaroNinc.com 3.) Larry Laukka (952) 893.1490 lal@laukka.com 4.) Greg Anderson (952) 927.5400 gnderson@andersonbuilders.com (/"O�,D3 Colonial Church reserves the right to: Request. additional information • Extend theAue date of the proposal • Interview any or all developers, • Reject, in whole or in part, any or all proposals • Obtain additional proposals beyond the due date if the proposals received are unsatisfactory • Negotiate with any qualified source • Cancel, in whole or in part, this Request for Proposal All proposals will become the property of the Church. -> The RFP is not a contract or a commitment of any kind by the Church and does not commit the Church to award an exclusive development option. No reimbursement will be made by the Church for any cost incurred by developers in preparation of the response to this RFP. City Map, Figure 1 N to 14" to i-394 ST. LOUIS PARK 7 69 E©INA Yernon " ovd. to Dols I �' wy Olinoor Blvd A,vo to 144 to WSW MSR Alrtirt Will of Atnadcm BLOOMINGTON / DS �l b 0 0 'rJ Oro c z Preliminary Illustrative Concept Plan, Figure 3 07 x 07 b o- 0 0 G C C UQ� C 0 Prepared by- 0 MA mattvicas ==.- 0.11 CD t-li oil UG CD (A lit WWI's it,.II — Of.. ICL 1. Mft• OM lk% mKM &M t 49" mll W I sA ;'M u.t tkl, n m al 1q St COLOMA Y Pt;o p Asbuill Survey ?dr. COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA 10P Prepared by- 0 MA mattvicas ==.- 0.11 CD t-li oil UG CD (A Land Use Task Force Members, Figure 6 Land Use Committee Roster 2007 -2008 Name 1-,' Inail Greg Anderson Address 01A., Suite, zip 4212 Oakdale Avenue INIlin/110111c Business Phone Cell Phone 952 927 -9572 952 927 -5400 ganderson(@anderson- builders.com Edina MN 55416 -5034 952 292 -1100 Bill Beard 4606 Sunnyside Road (952) 927 -6634 (952) 930 -0630 billbna,BeardGrounlnc.com Edina, MN 55424 -1104 952 457 -3405 Kirby J. Erickson 8309 West 93rd Street (952) 826 -0959 kerickson0330@comeast.net Bloomington, MN 55438 -1403 (612) 751 -0499 Michael C. Hime, Esq. 5300 Chantrey Road (952) 836 -0882 mhime@hirnegroup.com Edina, MN 55436 -2043 (952) 920 -1836 Larry A Laukka 1000 Coventry Place (952 893 -1490 (952- 896 -1971 lal@laukka.com Edina, MN 55435 -5639 952- 896 -1192 Linda J. Van Bergen 1610 Hill Ridge Ten-ace (952) 544 -7354 Livb53Qhotmail.com Minnetonka MN 55305 -1718 (612) 716 -0154 Elgin Manhard 5529 Village Drive (952- 944 -5541 emanhard(a,comcast.net Edina, MN 55439 -1062 (952) 612 -1477 Emily Wagner 6309 McIntyre Point (952) 941 -1863 (612) 850 -9078 embillwag@aol.com Edina, MN 55439 -1062 612 850 -9078 John Westfall, Senior Pastor 7136 Mark Terrace Drive (952) 381 -4454 iwestfall@colonialchurch.org Edina MN 55439 -1628 (952) 925 -2711 E. Ted Yoch (Chair) 6224 Braeburn Circle (952) 944 -5901 tedyoch .aracontent.com Edina, MN 55439 -2549 (952) 278 -0790 Jim Garvey Business Administrator Colonial Church of Edina 952- 925 -2711 igarveya,colonialchurch.org 6200 Colonial Way Edina, MN 55436 -1900 952- 925 -1591 www.colonialchurch.ors 2/O I I M' Slats COVER STORY:, shelter corporat,1011 Ma ini acyetne.i.it I- Tean"I Lynn Carlson &heU, RessiderfYCED Jay Jensen, Pnincipal Garreft Garllzon* Jr., Nncipal Kyle Didieri, dkef Beth Wilson, Chief Operating Offic'er KaNeen Conlan Joyce, Budnemsz Development ;�il 91 4- if I 21 e, in. I I' -'=;_I BY David Gee PHOTOS BY Tate Carlson ppearances can he deceiving, cant they? Look at Shelter Cxrpara,tion's wcbsite and Ayau'll see a basic, no-frills description of a "N12nneapnlis- baked corporation that finance,,, develops, awns, and manages mmdti -famnily anal. senior mental communities thraugh- mt the United States," Read dawn a little further and peels inside the portfalio anal you'll see the company principals have dn- eloped car ac5pirod 15,000 units encompassing $790 Million in real estat,<, sand currently have assets of around $400 million,. The cam, painy siso .manages over 8.000 units in a myriad of settitu,gr;. The corpmaa:te headquarters facility itself can play a trick. (in you as well.. The setting, abuutti:ng sane wetlands and a lake puust south of 494 and Minnetonka Blvd -, is certainly pastoral enough., and frrom the ou:t. id.e the brick building housing the hcadqua.rtcrs employees is nice looping. Step n,mdc however anal. you are treated tai ;a myriad of marble and glass and stunning views from multiple vantage paints and they even have l»SP'N cm. plasma screens :in the elegantly appointed men:ls room- How cool is that? The company president, CFO and founder Lynn Carlson Schell is also n - picture of uunderstateri elegance, though slit's had some success: worth shouting about as she shifted the company from a. service-oriented business to an asset -based entity. She also has the company poised for exponential growth even though. she doeset neccssarily think of herself as a a:lasruc entrtprenc ur. ,k 1. I54pii V'.' I fl , _'.`W'ci _ tie ' ( Ik•.._:� : i_ �� I'•.. -,.� i rC4' III- -� -I�I u ._ .__�? J,� t I,. ... I -I 11 I 10 11 l I' S f. 7 f, ' �1 •1' '•..r _k :k' I ,1 IC I'i•. }' 1 ICI., ll... ...I I�1.._ I . -_ ... '� I�•._ I. 'My sense of a traditional entrepreneur is srun- c one who really .is driven. and visionary.. I think lam. visions ry in the way that I want: to create something where there is a need or a vaud.. But mast: entrepreneurs I think of a re much more daring, and they're pretty big risk- takers. By nature real estate is a. very high. leverage bumf nLss and its a very risky business, and inhcrcntly I a m rislt- adverse " . . - That statement can be viewed. with some skepticism given that Carlson Schell in ur- pnrated the business in January of. 1. 9931, at a time when "real estate was just in the toilet" in her wards.. She had watched the principals of the de.w1opment cram any where she wInked fns- nine years generate personal wealth, take. at out of the company, and not value it the way she would. So she offered a buyumt, started up on her own, and took. on substantial personal liabilities in the process. That's a proposition that certainly could easily be cdescrilxd as risky, don't you think? "T.he first couple of years were really lean," she ,recounts. "I used to sit down and snap out how many payroll: I could rnake..At times I would have three months of payroll in the bank, sometimes I would have six! weeks. I :always thought if I got down to one month. I wcruild have to tell people." Furling those first two years the company had 2,000 units -under management and then she began the pmL- changing process of .mov- ing from a service oriented company to an W ,asset based cane, something that still holds true today- . Abcmt 1993 we diveT1 ifivd and figured .nut how- we could acquire," ' Carlson 'Schell said, in her beautifully appointed conference morn_ °` t .ha.d been. trained in. the area of nee�� construction which. is Soften easier to finance than an existing acr gisition.. T w u riderwriting fear acgtiusutinn is traditi;nnally more conserva- tive as the underwriter is Icmking at actual history ra.thm Haan prvjiections in the future. With. s glut of sup ply, ne�v construction .had died by the mid `90s. It was .very hard to access. capita . So we, really shufted our faxes and swung from almost 9.00 percent new construction to 9.00 percent acquisition ,and that madeuis: much a ciFecampetitive.'i?(de were really well positioned wh.en.real Mate began to wane back around 1997 (or so)." Another tipping point came during the period. from 1999 to 2001. when Shelter. COFp xrati.on diversified into senior commu- n:ittes. Spearheading that was a newly can - sttcud property called The Colony at 1,=a3e:n I'morm. It consists of 142 units of independent and assisted. Iivi:ng and annthcr 24 units of transitional. care In a surprisingly bucolic setting just cast of the Orden P- rairie Mall. ' "71be really unique thing about that is we took a campus that::is 100 pa:rcent housing and brought in a 2-5 bed Acill.ed nursing corn- pon. ent .lcare)• with a transitional care faxes Which allcnws l eve ra Re buy s i I3 c s.5 and 0.. a>� � �r�L�C,1° I'1 :1 ! .1 an.- n k-- a.dN.,, - .rse.„ 0.. b.Gt-G r q o� J I 3 r f e f V V tV +�, fie J. . ,. ..�.�.....w+...s- ...,'.i -. +.i v..�..i tu.Tl.'c�_tm'. w:. W :T:b= ii�i.:TTTf:.lu�L2A"v�:.•'f oAi d'nl4i9 c= a:.'S.tl.' 6l,' MS. 4�l. liA�e :B��.L.IYIL'tl�W�61.1{�49'IO Yd . ........ . ... .. . - _._ -__.. to create something where there is a. need or a void. But most entrepreneurs I think of are much more daring,: and they're pretty big risk - takers. By nature real estate is a vx:ry high leverage business and its a very risky business, and inherently I a:m. rash- advcrse _' That statement can be viewed with sumo skepticism given than Carlson Schell. incur- porated the business in january of 1993, at a time when. '"Teal estate was puust in the toilet" in her Words. She dead. watched the principals of the din-elnpunent campxany where- she worked for nine years generate pxersonad wca Ith, take it out of the company, and not valau it the way slue would. So she offered a buyout, started up on her own, and took on substantial persnnal liabilities in the process.. That's a pxraxp osidan that certainly: could e- asi'9y he ckscribcd as risky, d.on't you think? "The First coupe of yea. m wrur really lean,* she recounts."I used to sit down and inapp out ,how many payrolls I could make. At times I would, have three months of pa.yrdl in the bang€, sunwtimes I would have six weeks. I always thought if i got down. to one month. 1 would have to tell peopple.7 During those first two years the company .had. 2,000° units under management and then she began the game - changing prom of mov- ing from a service oriented company to an The Colony at Edina The Colony at Edina, in caopecalion with Codonial Church, will be an upscale senior houemg community with 125 units of senior independent lift, assisted living and mecriory support. out how we could acquire,". cquire," Carlson Schell ,said, in her bmutifully appointed conference room.'t had been. trained in the area of new cutnstrucrion which is often easier to finance thhan anexistingacquisition~ The-underwriting for acgWsition is traditionally more conserve -' tine as the underwriter. is looking, at actual history rather than projections in the future. With :a glut of supply, new crm structi.on had divot by the mid `90s. It was very hard to. ,access capital, So we really shifted our focus and swung from almost 1.00 percent new construction to 100+' percent acquisition and that made us much morecampetitive. We wire realdywell pxositi.nedwhen real estate began to come hack around 1997 (or so)." Another tipping point came during the period from 1999 to 2001 when Shelter Corporation clivcrsified into. senior comm.u- Iium, Spearheading that was a newly con- structed property called The Colony at Aden Mirie.It consists of 142 tunics of independent and assisted living and another 24 units of transitional care: in a. surprisingly bucolic setting jiust east of the F- den Ixaa.inie -Mail. "Thre .really unique thing about that is we took a campus that is 100 percent housing and brought in a 25 bred skilled nursing com- ponent (care) with a transitional care focus which allows ,L.-. it's a vcry risky bust n css, caf-9-- Of- Pc�3 The' CGIony at Inver Grove Heights 75-80 unit as+ssted liming facility adjacent to the Woodland Nursing Home. ,_3111 0— , L7 y- r TM,t ypr ! •.fa�F '!jk'`i1�JiM f :�F t � I I! !t •t� i� .1 i iii t. r"ti t' t' '�• ffa r f E i : t _ •; Gsafr -- - eople to do near lynfsPirtal- .Icve'] rehab 1,013 Othe development nights to a pica a of property brow th fair. Shelter Can rporatia:rn... I:uu �.�0 feet from. their spartmmerut (with as transitional care option)," Carlson :Schell stated proudly. "It was the first time this had been dam in the state and was one of the first .in the country and it has clone very well for us. The Minnesota Department of Health. and others have toured it to try to replicate a and as a matter of fact it has been rerdicated now n couple of times here in. this stage." Shelter C'oTporatinn itself is doing that as well with several new local pmo1ccts based on The Colony model. They're breaking ground this fall on Nokomis Assisted living in south at Crosstown a ndTiracy that Colonial C7huumh owns, Depending on the city� planning and zon ing prr�a, they slrrvnuld %real€ gra�utml in s ring of '09 with 1 5 units of scnior inck-pende -nt luring, assisted Iiwing and memory support. "Having these three properties in. a single market I think will, create a k)t more opportuni- ties for us," says Carlson ,Schell enthusiastically. "'Fire can..r:aist our private fund of equity to more metbacliacall.y and proaa tivdy go our and identify these tyrxs of transactions on a more cunsistent and programmatic basis." Th.aes not to say that the senior business that area. of the company doubled to. $55 million. in. revenue and Carlson Schell. says they are poised for more growth,, -even. as the market is a:hanging- "A generafimn ago you name to .a home and cc) nvaIcsced to the en dl of your lifc4 We're now very focus -d ern. giving people an opportuunitAr to choose from 3 whole spectrum of care options.. You nay. longer have to (keep moving ycYar horse and be continuiall'y dislala,c d ,as you age, but rather you can age in platy, in what - ever housing style you chocxse.. Th:at's what we heel is uunlgtw abGut the praduct we havfc_ Minneapoliks, and the company.recently wwon hasn't aIready represented a nice chunk of Is it news that out population is aging and D o,rd.� � ��1�i c ri t takest .so inc �'_ r at P vi t y -fist° p l-tt j c is to work. s o yo iu m.1, -a ri! t an opc n 1, fi.X-�- C, - c li vI I "f x-n Iii e n t: to, en cou 9°a.�,L- di slit process, ari d tea .riots onc ()f our l'cal sti-cngths." � will require. more and better buuusi:n.g: chnicr -0: she said she liked. what she saw of. the real. Nan. Does it di.l.uw the c p }partunuity? I d-on't late sector in genera L. think. so. "l here may he more competiti.•nan in. �'1 spry we get three bites at the appk—j. the fuutuure as morc ;anal m,ure, OMpan .-ics get into this area, but there -95a eery big learning curve.. As a result, I think. we are very well msitioncd with. a diricade of experience under our belts alre3.dy:" When Carlson Schell began to contemn- plate where she might go to get heir first professional work expene.riccafter c llcgc., 0 cash fl.oxv from transactions;, equity, anti then. the fee income from property management- Another wonderful. thing shout roil estate though. is that you. can cant nure tan• dabble in i.t as long as you wa-nL You can always decide to do cane -,tiff transactional Inuesiness sndl Ikerp :all of your holdings. even if at sorm: point you exit the operating company," Lunn. Carson �khe9l and h tr other partners aren't I.cnrakimg to put an exit strategy into Play anyft inne soon. Before. I exitttri the unterwiew though I decided to Ova: her another shot at MV- 0FIginal quewi.on because she sure sou n.&d a lot like a "cl:assi;c entrepreneur" to me. LLI think, song times people Iona k ata:nt:re- PQenrurs annd imagine they are something special. You M t back and you match. others and. you think: to yourself there bas to he some `secret! lout. there really :is n't- 'Phere 1:5 ckkfinicely an opypanrtunitu component to it- In my case it was being involved in a a:omrupony that was broken but had same good) psueces lying around- In those pieces [saw value.. What made me think .l cou. Ed da it? W%y not? 'Pknow, why not?' Letter: Project moving too fast Published: Thursday, March 4, 2010 A major real estate development in the northwest comer of Highway 62 and Tracy Ave is underway without a lot of Edina residents knowing about it. Waters Senior Living, a large real estate company with twelve senior living centers in place in Minnesota plus five more in the planning stage, has for the last three years been planning, in conjunction with Colonial Church of Edina, to build a very large senior firing center (apartment building) on 6 acres of land next to the church. This facility is huge -150 units, 600 feet In length and four stories tall. This would be a major change to the atmosphere of a wonderful residential area. The approval process of the City just started in January and is moving too fast; the proposal has already reoeived preliminary approval from the Council, Many residents are away far the winter and' only the residents who live within 1000 feet of the site have been notified of the plan. I would like to urge my fellow Edina citizens to become informed and then communicate to the Planning Commission and the City Council your opinion as to whether this facility is "reasonable" for the site. Visit www.ci.edina mn.us/ for more information. The next meeting of the Planning Commission will be in April. Spence Turner Edina (a Letter: Project too big Published: Thursday, March 25 The proposed Waters Senior .Living rental apartment complex, a joint venture of Colonial Church of Edina and Waters Senior Living, a for - profit corporation, is to be constructed . beside the Edina Fire'' Station, locking ' down on Countryside Park I and .a 'quiet neighborhood of single family homes. The proposed structure is as long as two football fields; 4 -.5 stories tall, 95 feet wide and includes 150 month to month rental apartments plus-support services. This massive'structure -.does not,confonm to the.following, objectives of Edina's long term Comprehensive Plan forgrowth. • Maintain Strong Residential Neighborhoods. • Offer Clear Community Benefits and Acceptable Design Elements and Project Intensity. • Protect and Pre_ serve the Essential Character, of Existing Residential Neighborhoods. • Encourage Development Projects That Complement the Area and Neighborhood. Much effort has been put into this plan yet many of the objectives are being disregarded by the city. Review, the entire Comprehensive Plan, at www.ci.mn.us/departments/CompPlan.htm The objective of the Countryside Neighborhood is to convince the city, church and developer to reduce the facility to a scale Countryside Neighborhood can support and to include a provision.that further rezoning for other uses be disallowed. A two -story ffty+ unit building would be more i in. line with the Fire Station, Nine Mile Village, Colonial Church, the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center and the Comprehensive Plan. Interested in learning more about the project and supporting your neighbors? Attend neighborhood meetings now, the Planning Committee meetings and City Council meetings in April and May. William C. Rodgers, Jr. Edina Letter. Site not appropriate for big development Published: Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:11 PM CDT Gail Berkley's argument ("Welcome seniors to Edina neighborhood," April 22) that the Save Countryside group does not welcome seniors is absurd. Many, if not most, of the active Save Countryside members are retired and many of the active members have lived in Edina since the 1960s when Tracy Avenue was a dirt road. What we are trying to save the neighborhood from is large -scale commercial development. If the Colonial Church four -story, 150 -unit project goes through as proposed, will other churches in Edina decide to use their empty space to build other large for -profit enterprises? If Edina truly needs that much more senior housing, why don't we turn the soon- to -be- vacant public works site into quality, multi -story senior housing? The land behind Jerry's Foods would be a much more appropriate site than the heart of Edina's single - family housing. Kent Gravelle, Edina 517 di ])V Letter: Size, process are concern, not seniors Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT As a resident of the Edina Countryside neighborhood and one of many seniors, I want to respond to Gail Berkley's letter to the editor ("Welcome seniors to Edina neighborhood," April 22) about what our yard signs mean to our neighborhood. Our group of nearly 300 and growing is asking Colonial Church, Shelter Corporation and the city of Edina to "Save Countryside Neighborhood" from losing its residential character by allowing the construction of a very large, for -profit $40 million commercial, high - density assisted living building as proposed. On www.edinacountrvside.com and in the few public meetings where we have been asked to share our concerns, we clearly stated we do not oppose development of this property or senior housing. What we do object to is a non -profit organization, working with a for -profit company, receiving a zoning change to build a 60-plus-foot-tall, two - football- fields in- length (600 feet), 95 -foot -wide high - density apartment building in our residential neighborhood. We have found that most of our neighbors had no idea of the size of this project until they actually walked the site. Our concern is also about how this proposed project received preliminary approval in just 45 days when the church, developer and city had been working on it for six months or more without any neighborhood notification or involvement whatsoever. The neighborhood group was given just 20 days notice before the developer filed the application Dec. 29, 2009. We are seeking a reasonably sized project that is complementary in character and symmetry to our residential neighborhood. Burton Shacter, Edina 20 Letter: Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community concerns Published: Thursday, May 6, 2010 3:06 PM CDT Ifs unfortunate that one person's remarks about whether seniors should have granite counters or other amenities are being allowed to obscure some legitimate community concerns over the proposed multi-story building that would dominate quite a bit of space in the quiet Countryside neighborhood. The Countryside - neighborhood likes the elderly - Iefs just be straight about that. I think the elderly deserve all the amenities they wish to have. They earned them. We bought our Countryside Road house from the original owners who built it in 1960. They raised their kids in a quiet, safe neighborhood. We honored that and looked forward to doing the same with our family, which we did. Now the older residents have raised their families and sold their houses to other young families who would like to do what their elders did: raise their children in low4raffic, beautiful, family- fiendly neighborhoods. These younger residents have legitimate concerns about new, tall apartment buildings being built next to parks and quiet neighborhood roads. They're concerned about losing their neighborhood character, which was built by our elderly neighbors, and having to worry about increased traffic in areas where their children ride their bikes and visit their friends. So really, ifs not about opposing old people, it's about younger people who would like to preserve the great place the older people built Let's talk about what we value instead of what we can tear down. Donna Callender. Edina /2/ t=� Letter: Only 35% of Colonial Church Members Live in Edina Unpublished as of 6/22/2010. On Fri, 6/18/10, Kent Gravelle <kentgraveIIe@graveIIelaw.com> wrote: From: Kent Gravelle <kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com> Subject: Most Colonial members live out -of -town To: "Katie Mintz" <kmintz @acnpapers.com> Date: Friday, June 18, 2010, 1:26 PM Dear Editor, The letter from Mr. Holderness stating that most Colonial members are Edina citizens is untrue. Looking at Colonial's membership directory, they have 1,258 members with only 445 living in Edina. That equals 35 %. Furthermore, Colonial Church is very liberal on who they list as a member because my wife, Holly, is listed as a member as well and neither she nor I have ever attended services at Colonial on more than two occasions. Finally, the correction on page 8 of the June 17th Sun is actually incorrect where it states that forestland will not be destroyed in building the assisted living center. City officials have testified before the planning commission that 333 trees and shrubs will have to be destroyed to make way for the building and the plans on the city's website clearly show that most of the proposed building site is currently forested. Sincerely, Kent Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 Home: (952) 922 -8596 6 2$ 6/15/2010 A synagogue for sale and a congregatio... Staffribune.corn MINNEAPOL'`� -.-T. r'AT_;L, i4II 1" r� OTr A synagogue for sale and a congregation in flux By JEFF STRICKLER, Star Tribune June 11, 2010 After a year of discussions, the decision has been made to put a "for sale" sign in front of B'Nai Emet Synagogue in St. Louis Park, but the congregation that meets at the corner of Ottawa Avenue S. and Hwy. 7 still hasn't decided whether it will continue. "What we do know for sure is that we can't stay in that building, said Rabbi Charni Flame Selch. "We've formed two committees. One is looking into the possibility of moving to the Plymouth -Maple Grove area, and the other is looking into merging with another congregation in St. Louis Park or Minneapolis." The situation the congregation faces is not unusual for faith communities in the central city or first -ring suburbs. As younger families settle in the more distant suburbs, the membership base gets smaller and grows older. The building needs repairs -- including a new roof -- that the congregation can't afford. The Plymouth -Maple Grove area was chosen for possible relocation because one -third of the members already live there. "We've been told that there's a need in that area for a Jewish preschool," Selch said. (If you're interested, she'd like you to contact the synagogue at 952 - 927 -7309 or info(- bnaiemet.org.) As for the possibility of a merger, it wouldn't be the first. B'Nai Emet was formed by a merger between two Minneapolis synagogues, B'nai Abraham and Congregation Mikro- Tifereth. Most houses of worship have multipurpose rooms, but the St. Louis Park building, which opened in 1959, took the concept to a new level. The sanctuary originally was set up so it could be converted to a basketball gym. For years, youngsters could be bar - mitzvahed one day and practice free throws in the same spot the next day. The congregation is holding a meeting Thursday evening to address the move vs. merger question. "Regardless of what's decided, it will be at least six months before anything happens [in terms of moving out of the building], and probably more like next June," Selch said. � 23 ng. 1/2 startribune StarTribunexom .^ringing more normalcy to memory -d re Jim Gehrz, Star Tribune When Marion Lovell's lapses into forgetfulness -- losing her glasses or forgetting her keys -- became frequent, her family knew something was wrong. After a year of seeing neurologists and undergoing tests, Lovell and her husband, Bob, of Plymouth, received the diagnosis in 2005: Alzheimer's. "She can become very confused over any small incident," Bob Lovell said. "But the funny thing about it is, she has retained just about all of her personality. She still likes to kid around and joke." Having just had heart surgery, Bob Lovell -- -qlized he wouldn't be able to handle ;lion's care on his own. So, after touring six different residential care facilities, he settled on Emerald Crest of Minnetonka, a facility dedicated to seniors with dementia. Augustana Care Corporation, a service provider for seniors, purchased Emerald Crest in January. The four Emerald Crest Assisted Living Memory Care facilities are Advertisement located in Minnetonka, Burnsville, Shakopee and Victoria. "The partnership filled a link," said Dave Saemrow, Augustana's director of marketing and public relations. "They could help us understand memory care and how to provide that service to people." Less restrictive care Augustana Care Emerald Crest offers a less restrictive treatment model in that its staffing, programming and buildings are specifically designed to give memory loss patients a setting more like home than hospital. They provide daily memory- stimulating activities, a staff specifically trained in caring for memory loss, and that allows memory patients to live in the least restrictive environment possible, said Christine Drasher, director of admissions and marketing. Each Emerald Crest campus consists of several single -story buildings that look like oversized ranch homes, each with 12 to 15 units, all single bedrooms, built around a central living room and kitchen shared by the patients. Emerald Crest specializes in mid- to late -stage dementia care, and a typical stay is about three years, with some residents Print Powered By Pori- nat:Dynamics" 2y StarTribuneocom tying until end of life. i-his small assisted - living model has gained in popularity in recent years, said Dr. Ed Ratner, a University of Minnesota associate professor who studies geriatrics and end -of- life care. It's a matter of debate whether residents receive better care in a facility entirely devoted to memory care versus one that assigns a single wing or floor to the specialty, he said. Either way, the challenges facing the patients must be addressed. In the Emerald Crest approach, care- giving changes as memory loss advances. Dementia patients are often faced with "potholes" in their thinking that gradually become larger and more debilitating over time, Emerald Crest cognitive specialist Theresa Klein said. The staff helps fill those gaps by assisting residents with daily ctivities such as dressing and bathing -- but �y're careful not to do too much. "We try to approach care as a partnership," she said. "Instead of doing everything for them, we figure out what they're able to do and allow them to do that. The things they can't do, the staff does." Focusing on what patients can do rather than aavertisemem �Xi GET THE LATEST NEW&' .V what they cannot helps de- stigmatize their disabilities and the help they do need, said Dr. Jim Pacala, associate professor of geriatric medicine at the University of Minnesota. "You label someone with dementia and that becomes the core of their identity," he said. Keeping patients active The facility hosts activities -- musical sing - alongs, puzzles, various forms of movement and bingo -- throughout the day to keep the residents active, Klein said. "We see people with dementia continuing to live with dementia, versus being in bed, sleeping and isolating in their room," she said. Though dementia is progressive in nature, the activities are meant to help residents retain their memories as long as possible, Drasher said. When Don Fitzgerald's wife, Andrea, began losing her memory, taking care of her became a 24- hour -a -day job. He finally realized he couldn't handle it alone when Andrea began wandering out of their Burnsville home in the middle of winter to "go Print Powered By ' For l riatOynamics StarTribuneocom home." When Andrea Fitzgerald first moved into Emerald Crest's Burnsville location more than four years ago, she was "very angry and kind of hard to get along with," her husband said. She has since settled in and Emerald Crest has become home, he said. "It's the best of all worlds" for her now, he said. Dementia on the rise Today, more people are living into their 80s and 90s, so there's a much higher burden of dementia in society, Pacala said. In the United States, 1 percent of 65 -year- olds and 10 percent of 75 -year -olds have dementia. "The question is, can we come up with ways stave off or delay dementia or are we just wing to keep seeing more of it ?" Pacala said. "That's a big, big issue facing medicine and facing health care policy in the upcoming decades." In any event, the demand for assisted living for dementia patients is likely to grow in the c oming years as baby boomers age, Pacala said. And unfortunately, dealing with dementia is never easy -- for the sufferers or their loved ones. "It's a difficult time," Bob Lovell said of watching his wife's memory fade -- "to see her kind of inching her way towards an emptiness." Tara Bannow is a University of Minnesota student on assignment for the Star Tribune. Print Powered By �,' Fon �� tDynamics' r � 3 rTribune.com ndmark Edina church could add senior housing HGA Architects Artist rendering of the proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina. But some wonder if the city needs another residence for senior citizens. By MARY JANE SMETANKA, Star Tribune ast update: March 16, 2010 - 3:18 PM . rth its distinctive bell tower and gray clapboard buildings, Colonial Church of Edina looks a bit like an old New England village. Now the church with the picturesque covered bridge and lake alongside Hwy. 62 could get a new addition: a 150 -unit assisted - living complex Advertisement fnr cPninr citizens The proposed $35 million to $40 million Waters Senior Living of Edina would sit between the church and Hwy. 62, on what is now a tree- shrouded parking lot. If the city of Edina gives the project the go- ahead, construction likely would begin a year from now. The Senior Living building would open in the spring of 2012. "We think-this will be the nicest senior living in Edina," said Jay Jensen, one of the principals of Waters Senior Living. "Edina is a gray city.... The closest competition is a building we manage, and it's full. Market studies show demand many times of what we're building." The proposal cleared its first hurdle recently when its preliminary plan won approval from the city's Planning Commission. The City Council will hold a hearing on the project Feb. 16. After that, it will have to go back to the commission and the council for final OKs. City planning staff support the project. But at the planning meeting, commission members and some city residents raised concerns. Neighbors were particularly worried that standstill traffic that develops on Tracy Avenue as Edina High School students drive Print Powered By d Dynamics 0 StarTribune.com to and from school could grow even worse. -.oncerns also were raised about the removal of mature trees and about whether the city really needs another development that serves senior citizens. Planning Commission member Floyd Grabiel said that some senior developments in the city are "empty." "I'm concerned about a 150 -unit development that may not go anyplace," he said. "What can you say to assure us that this will be a successful project ?" Jensen acknowledged that some developments for seniors are struggling, but he said they are aimed at active seniors. He said the nearest similar assisted - living facility is the Colony at Eden Prairie, which his firm also developed. That complex is full and has a waiting list, he said. the Eden Prairie building, three- quarters of residents moved from homes that were three miles or less away, he said. The rest had children who lived near the facility. Jensen said he expects the same pattern to be repeated in Edina. Ted Yoch, who led a church task force that eA r+i..,o.,+ looked at how the spare land could be used, said it concluded that the best use was senior housing. The Waters group was selected from 13 proposals because of its track record in Eden Prairie, he said. The church would sell six acres of land to the Waters and be a minority owner in the development. Jensen said church members would get priority on reserving apartments. Yoch said the development "would get seniors out of single - family homes and young families in. Church members want to stay in Edina, as do others. We think this would be a great thing for the community." Jensen also addressed other concerns that had been raised. He said the average age of residents at the Eden Prairie residence is 86, and very few of those residents, who are mostly women, drive, he said. Visitors most often come on weeknights and weekends, after peak driving times, he added. More than 330 trees would have to be removed from the site to make room for the new building, but most are scrubby trees such as box.elders, Jensen said. About 18 percent of the trees that would be removed are oaks. The project's landscape plan calls for protecting mature trees near the lake and Print Powered By -t., i-oi f- a LDynamics (ZO StarTribuneocom r nting more than 200 larger trees and lost 600 small trees and shrubs. t;vergreens would be planted between the new building and the highway, partly to mask the road noise. The four -story building would have two dining rooms, a library, a billiard room, a chapel, rooms for games and crafts, a therapy pool and a walking track. The facility would offer wellness classes and training. Residents would choose their apartment and the services they need would be delivered to them, Jensen said. There would be two 14- unit sections for people with memory problems. Jensen proposed that 30 of the 150 units be designated "affordable" for people on r estricted incomes. But if that is to happen, he told the Planning Commission, the project •ould need city help through tax increment 3ncing or another subsidy. While some r ..inning commissioners bristled at that request, Jensen later said that both Minneapolis and Eden Prairie used tax increment financing to help assisted- living projects in those cities move along. In March, Jensen's development group will break ground for another assisted - living , Advertisement building at 38th Street and 28th Avenue in south Minneapolis. Mary Jane Smetanka • 612 - 673 -7380 Print Powered By f- r�rrnatDynannics' 12, 9 Housing I Issuev Challenge ACTIon • • Affordable housing options • Institute property tax relief programs for are limited older homeowners • Home and building design is e Institute home modification and repair programs tailored to a narrow range of . Encourage universal design and physical abilities visitability in new housing construction • Housing and services are not • Build partnerships between housing and coordinated service providers The needs and expectations for housing change with age. Housing options in our communities should reflect these evolving needs and expectations. A livable community provides a range of housing types at various levels of affordability. This range should include supportive housing arrangements, such as assisted living, that are affordable for people of low and moderate incomes. Most communities, however, face major economic and political challenges to providing a diverse array of housing stock, including apartments, homesharing options; and compact housing. Enabling residents to age successfully in their homes and communities is critical to a community's ability to retain its tax base and preserve neighborhood stability. Homeownership rates among adults age 65 and above, at more than 80 percent, are higher than the national average."' By the same token, housing options for a community's oldest and frailest residents are equally important in providing less expensive alternatives to institutionalized care. `I One in every four renters age 50 and above pays 50 percent or more of their annual income on rent. Source: AARR Beyond 50.05:A Report to the Notion on Livable Communities: Creating Environments for Successful Aging (2005), 59. Strategy Local Flexibility Adding flexibility to local zoning codes is a critical step toward in- creasing the supply of affordable and age- appropriate housing. Many older adults would find it easier to age in their communi- ties if housing choices such as ac- cessory dwelling units and shared housing were more readily avail- able. See section on Planning and Zoning for action steps to in- crease zoning flexibility. Key Challenges and Action Steps: Housing 9 �I ��ees {�a -a0n, I Ps cc r,�o � flrc ;,5 t�3o R 1 �, iJUJi S"i � loo �GShin��Un �G a(;3cP ns� coJel(_C",f Planning and Zoning To age in place successfully, people need to have safe and easy access to services, amenities, and support networks (such as friends and family). These basic components of daily life should be accessible to people of all ages and abilities, including children and youth, people with disabilities, and older adults. The following components should be available in a livable community: E Residents can choose to live within walking distance (generally consid- ered to be one - quarter mile) of basic amenities, such as health facilities, drug stores, superman ets, and banks Land use plans and zoning codes enable and encourage housing in proximity to services and support the formation of intergenerational, mixed - income communities • Community planning is a trans- parent, participatory process Planning and designing communities for all residents need not be difficult. The physical characteristics of a livable community can be seen on any "Main Street," where some residences are close to stores and services and people can easily travel by car, on foot, or by bicycle, or where they can access convenient public transit. Most American suburbs, however, were built with automobile travel in mind. Most baby boomers have grown up and spent their adult lives in suburban areas. As they age, communities will need to adapt to their changing physical abilities and life circumstances. Key Challenges and Action Steps: Planning and Zoning 15 �� � C ccej 0,1 % , 0 Challenge Home -based services are often provided piecemeal rather than in a coordinated manner V\ In any given community, a wide array of health care institutions, community organizations, faith -based groups, nonprofit organiza- tions, and government agencies provide critical services to help people live independent lives. These services are often provided to any given individual piecemeal, rather than in a coordinated fashion. The lack of coordination can lead to duplication of services and frustrate individuals' efforts to find appropriate health care while remaining in their homes and communities. Fairfax County creates "clusters' to better serve older adults Fairfax CountyVi4nia, a fast - growing sub- urban area in metropolitan Washington, DC with more than I million residents. adopted a "duster care" model to more efficiently provide home -based care. Traditionally, home -based care has been segmented into several The program divides the county into sec - or clusters planning different categories of services. Sery ices are provided in reaction to an individual client's needs of the moment, and they are provided by within each cluster, with a single home care agency to provide different providers who do not share information or coordinate has limited mobility and who services on a task basis, replacing its for - mertime -based billing system.An analysis services. For example, a client who needs assistance with home modifications may be served by two of its services revealed that many tasks, delivered different providers, resulting in less efficient and less effective services. such could uld be performed by f e�(ttt3't As the population of older adults grows, the need for home -based increase. This is especially true for volunteers. In response, the county ex- panded the volunteer program and geo- graphically matched volunteers and dierft Y15+ LC health and supportive services will individuals sixty now serve more than the fastest- growing subset of the older adult population, 'volunteers age 85 and above. The cluster care model combines the Action Step county's intake process for a number services, so that the same staff can Integrate home -based services of now initiate services forAduk Protective Services, home -based care. Services, In a more integrated service delivery model, one government agency as the umbrella for home -based services and plans services on and Area Agency on Aging services. "We have focused on trying to integrate all of serves an individual client and a systemwide level. Adult protective services, are administered by a the services that a person needs to stay safe and independent:' Barbara social service programs, and volunteer programs a single caseworker, and infor- ntle the County Departur of single agency. Each client is assigned Services Social workers work with about the client is stored in a single database. each client to assess their needs, and clients receive an integrated suite of serv- Systemwide service needs can be mapped using Geographic Informa- ices based on the assessment tion Systems (GIS) that identify areas with high concentrations of The county has reduced its cost of serv- clients, such as Naturally Occurring Retirement-Communities Mapping these areas enables local governments to plan ices by more than $1,000 per client, en- ding it to serve more people with the (NORCs). services and assign providers and contractors more eff'tciendy. GIS is a same amount of funds. particularly useful tool for mapping services in large suburban, exurban, and rural areas. Source National Association Foundation, abon ofTh Area Maturi Agencies on of Aging and MetLife Foundation, The Maturing of America. 14; Grace Starbind Barbara AntleK and Trina Mayha rWebb, Fairfax County Department of Family Services Key Challenges and Action Steps: Health and Supportive Services '29 , JCUn0 nil - s5ot✓ ; op A-rec. Pne rXCA' -.S Oil nS 32 Home Modification: "Staying in Your Home May be the Best Option" Consider these findings from the AARP survey, Fixing to. Stay: A National Survey on Housing and Home Modification Issues: • "As Americans grow older they want to remain in their own homes, and many are modi- fying their residences to enable them to do so. • More than 8 in 10 respondents age 45 and over (including many Baby Boomers) - and more than 9 in 10 of those 65 and over -say they would like to stay where they are for as long as possible. • Even if they should need help caring for themselves, 82% would prefer not to move from their homes. • 67% of those making changes or modifications to their homes believe doing so will left them live there longer than they would have otherwise been able to - most for another 10+ years." kill,; t� r,7191111111111111 �'_ Helpfnq You and Your Family Enjoy the Comfort of Your Home We at Home Comfort Services will meet with the homeowner and or family and create an inventory of tasks, from the basic to the more difficult. These jobs are performed in a timely and professional manner. Our staff of licensed and qualified technicians will make sure every job meets and exceeds your expectations. When considering where you want to live, staying in your home may be the best and most cost effec- tive option. Much has changed in the past twenty years that make this option more attractive and af- fordable. Many neighborhood gro- cery stores will deliver either free of charge or for a nominal fee. Dry cleaning companies will pick up your dry cleaning and everyday laundry. Even veterinarians and pet groomers will come to your home. A wide variety of home health care services are available from nursing and medical assistance to bathing and foot care. In fact, almost any service imaginable is now equipped to serve clients right in their homes. Other factors that support this option may include: • Proximity to family, friends, neighbors, hospitals, doctors and houses of worship; & • Familiarity with neighborhood, services and stores. If you find that because of mobility or safety issues your home no longer meets your needs, what you may not know is there are companies who specialize in making modifications that will make it possible for you to re- main in your home. Some of the most common home modifications are: • Bathrooms — grab bars, comfort height toilets, barrier free showers, etc.; • Ramps; • Widening door and halls; • Auto door openers; • Stair chairs and lifts; & • Home elevators. Not only has the service indus- try changed to meet the needs of those wanting to stay in their homes, the home remodeling in- dustry has also changed to meet new needs. We have entered a new era in accessible design. Not Articles Page 20 only will these modifications make YOU and your guests more com- fortable, but, in the hands of a pro - fessional interior designer, your spaces can also be beautiful. The era of "institutional" looking acces- sible spaces is happily over. When considering remodeling firms to complete home modification work, there are several key questions you will want to ask: 1. Does your firm belong to any professional associations? -National Association of the Remodeling Industry (NARI) Builders Association of the Twin Cities 2. Has staff completed continuing education and certifications? .-Certified Aging in Place Specialist (CAPS) -Certified Remodeler (CR) 3. Does your firm offer free initial consultations? 4. Does your firm complete home safety and accessibility assessments? 5. Has your firm been recognized for accessible spaces? 6. Is your firm licensed by the State of MN? 7. Does your firm and all of its :subcontractors carry liability insurance? 8. May I see photographs of completed projects? 9. Do you have references? 10. Do you have a degreed interior designer on staff? When you analyze the cost of home modifications and remain- ing in your home with the cost of alternate living arrangements, you may discover that staying in your home may just be the best option. Mary Mackmiller, "Home for Go n� www.hfgpros.com s 952 -949 -8600 Ca Iv �, toy. re C)Prro s Senior Housing Directory X)10-aacl Mom and Dad Just Want to Stay at Home: "Home Care Services Can Be the Answer" When you ask people where they ant to spend their elder years, it usually is at home or in a homelike setting like an apartment or as- sisted living. Many people can re- main independent for many years. At some point, however, they may need some help. That is where home care can help. What is home care? Home care is a broad and extensive continuum of services. It may include non - medical services like homemaking services or personal care attendant services to licensed and certified services in- cluding skilled nursing, therapy and medical social services. Many people need help with gro- cery shopping, house cleaning and other chore services. Some people pay for these services out- of -pock- et. For people who meet certain in- come requirements, these services can be provided under Medicaid's Elderly Waiver Services Program. Personal Care Attendants, Per- sonal Care Provider Organizations and some licensed agencies pro- vide assistance to individuals with activities of daily living like dress- ing, grooming, bathing, eating, po- sitioning, transferring, & toileting. Certain income requirements must be met or spent down to qualify for these services under the MN Medi- cal Assistance (MA) Program. The Minnesota Department of Health licenses home care provid- ers. Some of those licenses include Class F, Assisted Living, Class B Paraprofessional Agency license and Class A Professional Agency license. The Class B license allows providers to assist clients with ac- tivities of daily living who just need a little assistance to perform these duties. A Class A agency provides services to people who are not able to perform activities on their own and who need assistance with medications, wound care and oth- er kinds of hands -on care. Medicare Certified Agencies can provide skilled services such as nursing, therapy services and home health aide services to cli- ents on an acute, intermittent basis following illness, injury or change in disease status. Services are physician- driven and reimburse- ment is contingent on the person being homebound. In most cases, the client needs to be 65 or older to qualify for these services. Ser- vices tend to be provided for short periods of time while the person's condition improves or stabilizes. Y66 h6ve Aher.ight e • - AGO percent SC i J isfied Wltb the • 'You receJve "We guarantee that we will be sensitive to your needs while respecting your pride and independence. Please call us. Kara i-ienhley, Director Respite for Family Members Alzheimer /Dementia Care Skilled Nursing Care Clothing /Dressing Transportation Medication Reminder Meal Preparation Companionship Accessible MI dome Health Care Investigated, Trained & Experienced Caregivers 952 - 546 -5488 Live Person (24/7) Visit us at: www.accessibleivestmi3is.com Page 21 Senior Housing Directory X01() -011 Articles Mom and Dad Just Want to Stay at Home (con-fifinued) Who pays for Home Care? You can pay privately or out -of pocket. Some private insurance policies cover home care services. A couple of other private sources are Long Term Care Insurance and Reverse Mortgages. Public sources include Medical Assistance, Elderly Waiver and Medicare. To learn more about home care payer sources, contact the Senior LinkAge Line®, County Public Health Agency, Minnesota HomeCare Association or Minneso- ta Department of Human Services. If you or a loved one is having dif- ficulty performing tasks, turn to a family member for help. If family is not available, contact your county public health department which will do a screening called a long -term care consultation to determine if you are eligible for services. This con- sultation considers needs as well as income criteria. If you are 65+ you mATRIV 2111 .A Leader in Care for Seniors & People with Disabilities Since 9987 Experienced Professional Registered Nurses • Provide objective evaluation /expert advise • Facilitate independence • Maximize wellness and functional status • Navigate complex health care system • Objective choices and support • Offer private -model Class A home health care services www- mafrixadvocare.eom 952 -525 -0505 Articles may qualify for Medicare services, particularly if you are coming out of the hospital or transitional care. Looking for Care? Minnesota home 'care resources include: Care Options Network (www.careoptionsnetwork.org), Senior LinkAge Line' (800 -333- 2433 or www.minnesotahelp. info), MN HomeCare Association (651- 635 -0607 or 866- 607 -0607, vtww.mnhomecare.org), county public health agencies, private health insurance, MN Department of Human Services, MN Depart- ment of Health, MN -North Dakota Chapter of the Alzheimer's Asso- ciation, physicians, friends, rela- tives & Case Managers. Neil Johnson Minnesota HomeCare Association Exceptional 24 Hour Personal At -hom(a Adult Assistance & Care NURSING 1HHA'SI COMPANIONS 612-708-1079 www.adulthelpcare.com Assisting throughout the Twin Citie::. Page 22 Senior Housing Director ao10 -abN The Colony at Eden Prairie Personal Care Services Service Packages (continued) Safety Checks 1x /day NAR $156.00 1month 15minute increment 2x 1day NAR $260.00 /month Homemaking NAR Visit 15 minute increment $9.00 1visit Bedmaking Cleaning, Trash removal, Commode. cleaning, dishes Dally 15 min. Increments NAR NAR $94.00 /month Laundry (wash personal clothing; hang and storage) Weekly NAR $94.00 1month Linen (changing and washing bedding) Weekly NAR $83.00 /month Laboratory Services Per occurrence $25.00 $83.00 /month Incidental Charges RN Visit 15minute increment $25.00 1visit LPN Visit 15 minute Increment $18.00 1visit NAR Visit 15 minute increment $9.00 1visit Meal Deliveries Per occurrence $5.00 Escort Per occurrence (two way) $9.00 Shower Per occurrence $25.00 Laundry. Per occurrence $25.00 Laboratory Services Per occurrence $25.00 Replacement emergency pendant Per occurrence $150.00 Foot Care Per occurrence $20.00 The Colony Apartment Pricing — Monthly Rent* Type Square Ft. Rent View Studio Georgetown 415 $2825 front Brunswick 428 $2825 front One Bedroom 530 $2850 courtyard Lexington Fairfield 576 $2925 front view Fairfield 576 $2950 courtyard Bradford 603 $2925 front view Bradford 603 $2950 courtyard Westport 707 $3125 wetland Hampton 773 $3,000 courtyard Newport 816 $3125 front courtyard Newport 816 $3200 $3300 wetland Newport 816 One Plus Den Nantucket 946 $3325 wetland Yorktown 979 $3275 front Two Bedroom Two Bath courtyard Barrington 822 $3025 Stratford 1044 $3625 wetland Jamestown 1100 $3550 front courtyard Jamestown 1100 $3650 $3800 wetland Jamestown Bridgeport 1100 1102 $3800 wetland Two Bedroom One Bath Cambridge 1145 $3725 wetland *Rent includes three meals daily in our full service dining rooms, weekly light housekeeping, in -house emergency pendant, daily I'm OK check (wall transmitter), licensed nurse on duty 24/7, transportation to scheduled events and shopping, health and wellness programs, social, recreational and educational programs, and spiritual services. *2 "a person fee $525 X37 1he.re cAr ,l'Y}t'.r�J zrUlu�.4 t�F„vc.rr (V(rJr JL/ /(e1p nrUi 00 Edina Resource Center 5701 Normandale Rd., Room 171, Edina, MN. 55424 Hel pl i ne: 952 - 848 -3936 www.edinaresourcecenter.com This list is provided as a courtesy of the Edina Resource Center. Please make your own inquiries and decision as to whether the following services are right for your needs. You are encouraged to ask if they are licensed and bonded and request references for their services. In -home assistance to adults — Many of the agencies below provide in -home assistance to adults which includes services like light housekeeping & laundry, grocery shopping & errands, medication reminders, transportation to appointments, companionship, etc. Home Health Aides or Nursing services — If the agencies provide these services, it is noted below. CAREGIVER SUPPORTS Above & Beyond Senior Services 13708 Bluewing Dr., Rogers, MN. 55374 Phone: 612- 965 -5122 www.aboveservices.com Senior move management and physical & occupational therapy consultation. Adult Help and Companion Care 4584 Cedar Lake Rd., Suite 5, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Phone: 612 -708 -1079 www.adultheipcare.com In -home assistance for adults. Nursing assistance available also. Age Well 4940 Viking Dr., Ste. 545, Edina, MN. 55435 Phone: 952 - 345 -8770 www.agewellhomecare.com In -home assistance for adults. Home health aides available. Allied Professionals, Inc. 3209 West 76th Street, Edina, MN. 55436 Phone: 952 - 832 -5101 www.alliedprofessionaIs.com In -home assistance for adults. Post - operative care. Alzheimer's Association 4550 W. 77th St. Suite 200, Mpls., MN.55435 Phone: 952 - 830 -0512 Information Helpline: 1- 800 - 232 -0851 www.alzmndak.org Alzheimer's information, support and referrals to area resources. A Place for Mom Phone 763- 425 -4424 www.aplaceformom.com Free senior care referral service helping families understand their options related to assisted living facilities, nursing homes, in -home care, etc. l 3 d' Home Solutions 6965 Langford Court, Edina, MN 55436 -1661 Phone: 952 - 292 -5801 www.athomesolutionsllc.com In -home assistance for adults. Bloomington Public Health 1900 W. Old Shakopee Rd., Bloomington, MN. 55431 Phone: 952 - 563 -8900 Home visits to seniors by a nurse who will answer questions about health concerns and connect seniors with resources. http: / /www.ci. bloomington. mn. us /cityhall/ dept / commsery /publheai /seniorhealth. htm Care Minders 4501 Minnetonka Blvd., Suite 100, Mpls., MN. 55416 Phone: 612 -435 -7140 www.careminders.com In -home assistance for adults as well as nursing services. Catholic Charities 215 Old Sixth Street, St. Paul, MN 55102 Phone: 651 - 215 -2246 www.ccspm.org Provides counseling to caregivers to assist them in making decisions related to their caretaking roles. Cognitive Care Coaches 8150 Bavaria Road, Victoria, MN 55386 Phone: 952 - 239 -3657 www.cognitivecarecoaches.com Provides information, resources and training to caregivers helping adults with Dementia. Comfort Keepers 1405 N. Lilac Dr., Suite 113, Golden Valley, MN. 55422 Phone: 763- 546 -8070 www.comfortkeepers.com In -home assistance for adults and home safety technology solutions. Compassion & Choices P.O. Box 24902, Edina, MN 55424 -0902 Phone: 952 - 929 -1955 www.compassionandchoices.org Support for families and caregivers facing important end -of -life decision. Cornerstone HealthCare, Inc. 15500 Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 -1416 Phone: 952 -473 -1177 www.cornerstonehc.org In -home assistance for adults as well as nursing services. Errands & Things 11307 Rich Circle, Bloomington, MN 55437 Phone: 952 - 888 -1305 or 612 -600 -6459 www.errandsandthings.com In -home assistance for adults. P � B 39 Errands Are Easy Phone: 952 -496 -1155 www.ErrandsAreEasy.com In -home assistance for adults. Fairview Home Care and Hospice and Senior Companion Program 245026 th Ave. So., Mpls., MN 55371 Phone: 612 - 728 -2468 or 1- 866 - 827 -5039 www.fairview.org/homecare Home care visits from Home Health or Hospice Aides for personal care as well as private duty nursing care. Senior Companion program provides volunteers to help with in -home assistance for adults. Fairview Lifeline 2450 26th Ave. So., Mpls., MN 55406 Phone: 612 - 728 -2468 or 1- 866 - 827 -5039 www.fairview.org /homecare /Lifeline Personal medical alert service that links caller to 24 -hour assistance. Fairview TeleCare 6410 France Ave. So. Edina, MN 554345 Phone: 952- 924 -5910 Free telephone assurance service for people who live alone (no website link) Geriatric Care Management Services 17710 Old Excelsior Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 952 -474 -7141 or 952 - 474 -6508 www.eldercare.stubbe.com Geriatric Care Managers that coordinate services from other in -home assistance agencies. Geriatric Consultation and Family Services 5100 Eden Ave., Suite101 B, Edina, MN 55436 Phone: 952 - 929 -1772 www.geriatricservicesmn.com In -home assistance for adults, Home Health Aides and care services management Home Care Solutions 3387 Brownlow Ave., Suite 200, St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Phone: 952 - 924 -0677 www. HomeCareSolutions. info Live -in Home Health Aide assistance as well as Nursing assessments. Home Instead Senior Care 4445 W. 77th Street #224, Edina, MN 55435 Phone: 952 - 929 -5695 www.homeinstead.com In -home assistance for adults. Homewatch Twin Cities Phone: 763- 546 -8899 or 651 -699 -5070 www.HomewatchMN.com In -home assistance for adults. Home Health Aides and Nursing care. Intrepid 5353 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 300, St. Louis Park, MN. 55416 Phone: 952 - 513 -5400 www.intrepidusa.com Total home health services. Skilled nursing. olqo Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis 13100 Wayzata Blvd, Suite 400, Minnetonka, MN. 55305 Phone: 952 - 546 -0616 www.jfcsmpls.org In -home assistance for adults and care management services. Let Linda Do It — For Seniors Phone: 952- 239 -4816 In -home assistance (no website). LivHome St. Louis Park, MN Phone: 952 - 545 -0570 www.livhome.com In -home assistance for adults and care management services. Pathfinder Care Management 4828 Chicago Ave. S. Suite 205, Mpls., MN. 55417 Phone: 612- 729 -9096 or 1- 800 - 720 -9096 www.rentadaughter.com Geriatric Care Managers that coordinate services from other in -home assistance agencies. Right at Home 9000 Old Cedar Ave. S. Suite 1, Bloomington, MN 55425 Phone: 952 - 854 -6122 www.rah-tc.net In -home assistance for adults. SarahCare 4833 West 123rd Street, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952 -465 -0555 E -mail: info @sarahcaremn.com www.sarahcaremn.com In -home assistance for adults, Home Health Aides and Nursing assessments. Seniors' Choice at Home 9909 South Shore Drive Suite 1A, Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763 - 546 -1599 www.seniorschoiceaz.com In -home assistance for adults. Senior Community Services 10709 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 111, Minnetonka, MN 55304 Phone: 952 - 541 -1019 (Main Office) Edina residents call Gayle Wright Fickbohm at 763 - 450 -4310 www.seniorcommunity.org Senior Outreach Social Workers offer free home visits to help seniors and their caregivers to help identify the services needed and connect them to in -home services, housing options, health insurance counseling, friendly visitors, etc. Senior Helpers 7800 Metro Parkway Suite 212, Bloomington, MN 55425 Phone: 952 - 392 -1999 E- mail:TwinCities @seniorhelpers.com www.seniorhelpers.com In -home assistance for adults. Senior LinkAge Line Phone: 1- 800 - 333 -2433 www. M i n n esota H e l p. info Free statewide community resources for seniors and their caregivers. Seniors Helping Seniors 14565 41st Ave. No., Plymouth, MN. 55446 Phone: 763- 694 -0165 E -mail: helpingseniorsmn(a)-gmail.com In -home assistance for adults. Synergy Home Care Phone: 612 -455 -2585 www.synergyhomecare.com In -home assistance for adults. The Simple Solution 1099 Case Ave., St. Paul, MN. 55106 Phone: 651 - 336 -6716 www.thesimplesolution.biz Home organization, errands, shopping, etc. Third Hand Concierge Phone: 852 - 935 -4809 In -home assistance (no website) In -home assistance for adults. Touching Hearts at Home 10700 Old County Rd. 15, Ste 290, Mpls., MN 55441 Phone: 952 - 826 -9594 or 763- 544 -0401 www.touchinghearts.com In -home assistance for adults. Visiting Anrls 1000 E. 146 St., Suite 102, Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone: 952 - 891 -8000 www.visitingangeismn.com In -home assistance for adults. You Go Girls! Sallie Eckhouse and Wendy Blaschke Phone: 612- 386 -7086 Personal Concierge Service (no website) Home organization, errands, shopping, etc. 5 �y2 rSTATE OF NIEZ(0)M% DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES June 10, 1977 Metro Region Headquarters Waters Section 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 (612) 296-.7523 Colonial Church of Edina. Charles A. Geer Larry Lsukka 5532 Wooddale Avenue Mmeapolis, Minnesota 55424 Gentlemen: In order to make a determzinatim of the status of the wetlands at the site of your proposed church, a representative of this office, Michael Mueller, made a field investigation on May 24. According to Circular 39, USFWS, criteria for Type III and Type IV wetlands include: soil waterlogged during the growing season with 6" to 39 of standing water in places. Aquatic vegetation such as cattails, grasses, sedges, rushes, and submergent aquatics are present. These two wetlands together with Type V. deep inland lakes, constitute the best nesting and feeding habitat of any wetlands. The observation of cattails, cane grass (Phragmites) and reed canary grass in conjunction with standing water at the site indicate that these ponds are Type III wetlands. Review of 1967 U.S.G.So quadrangle maps show an extensive marsh at this site and aerial photos taken in 1965 also verify the existence of wetlands prior to any development. We believe the dredging of the ponds by Pemton in 1971 was unauthorized in relation to Minnesota Statutes 105:42. Of further interest to the determination of status, we note this site lies within the floodplain of reline Ndle Creek and connects to the creek via a culvert under Co. 62. Based on the above criteria and the grading plans submitted to this office, we have classified all lands at elevation 850 or below to be public waters. Any changes in the course, current or cross — section of public waters relative to M.S. 105:42 requires the written approval of the Commissioner of Natural Resources. Therefore, we require that application for a water resources permit be made prior to any development on this site. Our initial concerns include equal replacement. of wetlands lost to construction, either on site or at an alternate location and additional dedication beyond the one acre already designated may be required. I will be available for further discussion of this development at your convenience. Y truly Ronald D. rnack Regional Hydrologist RM:MM.- jm cc: Gordon Highes — Edina Aline Nile Creek Watershed District Barr Engineering ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES • WATERS, SOILS, AND MINERALS • LANDS AND FORESTRY GAME AND FISH PARKS AND RECREATION ENFORCEMENT AND FIELD SERVICE ,a's'lo..fa 69) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. AFFIDAVIT OF JED JEN (INS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The undersigned, being duly sworn, states, and alleges as follows: 1. My name is Jed Jenkins and I live at 5708 Olinger Blvd., Edina, MN 55436. 2. My home is located on the other side of Countryside Park from the proposed Living Waters project, adjoining Colonial Church. 3. The water table in this neighborhood is very high. 4. The sump pump in our home runs continuously for a significant part of the year and is running currently. 5. I am concerned that if the proposed 150 -unit Living Waters project becomes a reality, the significant loss of forest and green space will make the water problem worse for me and my neighbors. FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. 0 0 0 0 0 0 RENO- N o � Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of March, — 1 O 4a� 9 Notary Public - '�`;' MICHAEL WIERSMA /. '`'_ ,..,�Tkpv pUBUC MINNESOTA My CDrami.3= Expires Jan. 31 2013 ! Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague Jackie Hoogenakker Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Hello City Leaders of Edina and Ms. Hoogenakker, We want you to have the Yard Sign roster (attached as a separate PDF) which represents between 368 and 490 property owners /residents /taxpayers /voters in the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group that are opposed to the previous and current revised plans, and what it means to display a Yard Sign in front of your home. The Yard Signs are to inform and demonstrate to residents and City Leadership that there are a significant number of residents in this area that opposed the previous Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation Living Waters Plans, and currently oppose the Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 submitted to the City of Edina by the Church and Developer. This Neighborhood group has worked in good faith with the Developer and Church and unfortunately we have not been able to come up with an acceptable agreement. We ask respectfully for you to reject the plans being presented at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission and July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting, and demand the Church and Developer come up with plans that are more complementary to the symmetry and character of the neighborhood; plans that are more in line in size and scope of the other one and two story buildings in this solely residential area. Households presenting their yard signs have done so diligently since March 2010 and they still are displayed, that is over three months. We were asked to be on TV with Channel 5 and there is an attachment that explains that further and it also is copied below. Though not presented below there is a PDF attached capturing Why did we decide on yard signs? We decided on yard signs in an effort to communicate concerns pertaining to the proposed Waters Development. A website (www.edinacountryside.com) and an interactive phone system (952- 929 -1447) were developed. if you go to the About Us page of the website it explains the concerns of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood at the onset. I have copied it below for your Countryside Neighborhood Yard Sign Displayers Oppose the Current Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 — May 2010 to the Present The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group appreciates the efforts of Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation to make changes to the project based on the comments that were received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood that attended the meetings in April and May of 2010. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front fagade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project as was submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small - scale economic activity. The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building — i.e.., 139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The only buildings of similar mass and scope are Valley View Middle School and three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue ed with a Olinger Bouevard, as grey box by well day and parking lot entire neighborhood, will be confronted lights by night. There is one point we want make very clear: the Countryside Neighborhood Group are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non - profit senior housing project could be self- sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that Colonial Church d ork together Shelter lto Corporation enter into development plan dialogue with them as stakeholders a for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Residential Countryside Neighborhood. The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood a reference. I also have copied our current position after meeting in good faith with the Church and Developer below as well. With the use of the website and the phone, these two technologies offered residents the ability to request a lawn sign to spread the word and share their concern and opposition. We also had many volunteers walking door, to door to inform Edina Residents to become informed and form your own opinion. Attached for your review per your request are households that requested a lawn sign as a result of being informed and taking their stance. A summary of this data is captured below and replicated in the attached PDF as follows: Two hundred forty five (245) yard signs were distributed. Of those, 184 are referenced in the attached spreadsheet. This equates to approximately 368 residents assuming two or more residents per household. 61 lawn signs were not tracked on the spreadsheet because volunteers didn't collect the household data when going door to door. Based on this data there is between 368 to 490 [(368 +61) *2 ] voting residents with signs on their lawn. Similar information is being gathered of those who signed a petition and will be presented once complete in the coming days. If you have questions please allow us the opportunity to answer them. Thank you for the time and consideration, Kevin McCoy 5809 Jeff Place Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group /y8 First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs R Clark and Tina Bain 5812 Amy Dr 920 -1806 thefoodpalette @aol.com 1 Sohiela Mirsharif 5905 Amy Dr 929 -0477 1 Cassandra & Matt Headrick 5920 Amy Dr 920 -9752 cmuldoon200l @yahoo.com 1 Kirk & Kris Swenson 5924 Amy Dr 926 -2476 kswenson7 @comcast.net 1 Burton Shacter 5800 Arbour Ave 920 -8324 bbshacter @comcast.net 1 Tony & Sonja Roy 5900 Arbour Ave 926 -1029 1 Michael Totzke 5904 Arbour Ave 922 -5500 1 Nancy & Kirk Mathison 5908 Arbour Ave 922 -0733 downdraft @live.com 1 Peter &Mary Tony & Michele Mulheran LeFebvre 5940 6020 Arbour Ave Arbour Ave 933 -5947 920 -8847 petem @sani - blast.com mtlefebvre @comcast.net 1 1 Bob & Betty Sandy Edwards Maloney 6112 6000 Arbour Ave Arbour Lane 929 -5676 797 -6049 sgilinterpreter @hotmail.com 1 2 John & Jeanne St. Pierre 6005 Arbour Lane 929 -0175 jst.pierre @comcast.net 1 Erik & Karl Vanderbilt 6012 Arbour Lane 928 -3853 1 Bill & Judith Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane 927 -9421 jbr62 @eartl rnk.net 1 Grace Kelly 5701 Ayrshire Blvd 920 -4208 1 Mary Brad McDonald Boyd 6216 5212 Belmore Lane Benton Ave 938 -2215 612 - 554 -1679 bboyd0l @gmail.com 1 1 Linda Enck 5700 Benton Ave 925 -2386 slamenck @comcast.net 1 Cindy Yu 5708 Benton Ave 919 - 601 -4695 yu_xinying @yahoo.com 1 Dino Balafas 5316 Blake Road 930 -3873 balafasl @gmail.com 1 Bonnie Waddick 6008 Chapel Drive 996 -9479 katherinejill @hotmail.com 1 Joseph Portillo 5412 Countryside Rd 1 Judy Nancy & Mario Petts Lopez 5416 5420 Countryside Rd Countryside Rd 927 -4384 922 -1917 lopezgrubb @yahoo.com 1 1 Patrick &Tina Willette 5517 Countryside Rd 920 -2416 patrickwillette @hotmail.com 1 Mike Hagenson 5612 Countryside Rd 925 -4280 mike.a.hagenson @medtronic.com 1 Karl Gensheimer 5616 Countryside Rd 1 Suzanne Thoresen 5621 Countryside Rd 926 -1231 shoresen @aol.com 1 Carmen & Rob_ ert Eide 6013 Crescent Dr 612 - 850 -6730 Carmeneide @yahoo.com 1 Tim & Lauren McNamara 6201 Crescent Dr 926 -6154 1 Bernard Bjerken 6204 Crescent Dr 929 -2320 1 Seth Griak 6208 Crescent Dr 1 David Lowe 6213 Crescent Dr . 920 -9621 1 Robert Granson 6217 Crescent Dr 926 -7527 1 Jenny Covington 6229 Crescent Dr 303 -5047 cov1000 @gmail.com 1 David and Sharon Strand 6236 Crescent Dr 1 Dorothy & Robert Pool 6241 Crescent Dr 929 -5465 2 Ruth & Wayne ' Kewitsch 5624 Doron Dr 829 -5911 rkewitsch @gmail.com 1 Tyler Christopherson 5833 Eastview Dr 920 -4544 tcchristopherson @gmail.com 1 Doug & Molly Van Metre 5224 Forslin Drive 928 -9285 vanmetred @msn.com 1 Theresa Williams 6701 Galway Dr 942 -5775 1 Kristin Peterson 5604 Gate Park Road 651 - 398 -2133 kristin.peterson @msn.com 1 Manuel Amaya 6904 Gleason Ave milikan_2000 @yahoo.com 1 Ron Fraboni 5505 Grove St 925 -9327 Frabonimn @earthlink.net 1 Sue Clasen 5600 Grove St 926 -6445 sueclasen @comcast.net 2 Greg & Rose Rustad 5616 Grove St 929 -8906 rkrustad @comcast.net 1 live on Hanson Morgan 5716 Hansen 612 - 532 -9943 1 no email given 1 Jim Grace 6012 Hansen Rd 928 -0758 gracegrund @comcast.net 1 Cindy Nelson 6120 Hansen Rd 925 -3613 cindy_I_nelson @uhc.com 1 Page 1 of 4 l First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs Christine Ehrlich 5701 Hawkes Dr 426 -1142 cehrlich70 @gmail.com 1 Susan Chandler 5709 Hawkes Dr 929 -8464 Stcedina @aol.com 1 David & Susan Nelson 5701 Hawkes Terr 922 -1141 sumacandnelski @gmail.com 1 Farkhod & Madina Salamov 5708 Hawkes Terr 288 -5531 farkhodbek @yahoo.com 1 Timothy & Marian Olson 6201 Hillside Rd tolson7515 @aol.com 1 Alfreda Terry 6204 Hillside Rd 920 -6927 1 Spencer Turner 6208 Hillside Rd 929 -6216 sturnerl2 @comcast.net 1 Tony Olson 6209 Hillside Rd 240 -1402 adollh @yahoo.com 1 Jeff & Susan Petersen 6213 Hillside Rd 927 -6200 edinaite @yahoo.com 1 Mark Videle 6300 Hillside Rd 612 - 207 -6951 mvidele @comcast.net 1 Mark Evenson 6304 Hillside Rd mevenson @carlsonprint.com 1 David and Jean Wikoff 6305 Hillside Rd 925 -4230 djwikoff @comcast.net 2 Delores Storm 6308 Hillside Rd 1 James Ostlund 6309 Hillside Rd 1 Pam Loffhagen 5801 Jeff PI 927 -4137 1 Jim & Liz Beer 5804 Jeff PI 922 -0164 jbeer5804 @gmail.com 1 David & MaryAnn Meyer 5805 Jeff PI 927 -4904 dfineyer @mindspring.com 1 Tom & Jenny Weber 5808 Jeff PI 925 -4210 1 Kevin & Anne McCoy 5809 Jeff PI 928 -9940 annemccoy @comcast.net 1 Ray & Marsha Giske 5812 Jeff PI 920 -6930 1 Chuck & Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff PI 920 -1931 christine .henninger @genmills.com 1 Steve & Linda Chambers 5820 Jeff PI 929 -3323 1 David White 5821 Jeff PI 1 Doug & Patty Barber 5824 Jeff PI 925 -3181 barberd @divtechusa.com 1 Larry & Dot Kerzner 5828 Jeff PI 928 -9431 dkerzner @comcast.net 1 Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff PI 926 -1763 barbarahoganson @comcast.net 1 John Harden 5829 Jeff PI 926 -1764 Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff PI 925 -1016 gjjohnson3 @comcast.net 5 Dadi & Penny Setiadi 5841 Jeff PI dadi_S @yahoo.com 1 Catherine Marble 6712 Limerick Lane clm @info9.net 1 Ann & Kendall Compton 5201 Lochloy Drive 925 -1630 anncompton @comcast.net 1 Joe Lambrecht 5324 Maddox Lane 612 - 986 -9691 josephlambrecht @ yahoo.com 1 Dennis Seemann 5700 Olinger Blvd 925 -4123 2 Karen Jarvey 5704 Olinger Blvd 922 -7277 1 Jed Jr & Cindy Jenkins 5708 Olinger Blvd 270 -4501 jsjenkins @stthomas.edu 1 Jose and Toby Hanson 5712 Olinger Blvd josehanson @comcast.net 1 Karen Gooch 5800 Olinger Blvd 285 -9088 gogetgooch @hotmail.com 1 Jonathan Rosenberg 5808 Olinger Blvd 1 Mike & Jayne Lonergan 5812 Olinger Blvd 928 -0237 1 Bill & Judy Johnson 5816 Olinger Blvd 922 -6929 bljohnson2008 @comcast.net 1 Stephen & Jessica Berg 5820 Olinger Blvd 922 -0142 NINETWENTY @EARTHLINK.NET 1 Franz & JoAnne Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd 920 -1529 franzsr @aol.com 1 Elizabeth & Eric Jensen 5916 Olinger Blvd 922 -4337 elizabeth.jensen @comcast.net 1 Mark Guettler 5920 Olinger Blvd 926 -0904 mark _guettler @yahoo.com 1 Ying CIJ 6101 Olinger Blvd 1 Gary Mackenzie 6105 Olinger Blvd 1 Paul & Anita IAxt 6109 Olinger Blvd 925 -1440 pauljaxt @gmail.com 1 Skip & Marta Melin 6111 Olinger Blvd 922 -4964 williammelin @gmail.com 1 Robert & Carolyn Hagen 5720 Olinger Rd 920 -2602 chagen42 @yahoo.com 1 Amanda Kimmet 5725 Olinger Rd 651- 210 -7480 glaciergirl84 @gmail.com 1 Page 2 of 4 /SO First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs David Simons 5725 Olinger Rd Jim Tabor 5829 Olinger Rd tabo0006 @msn.com 1 Dennis & Laurie Eckberg 5902 Olinger Rd cjedennis @comcast.net 1 Jim and Jane Sletten 5906 Olinger Rd 927 -9419 JJDTS @aol.com 1 Brice Martinson 6100 Ridgeway Rd 1 Jennie Johnson 6108 Ridgeway Rd 612 - 532 -1307 Jennie @jenniesays.com 1 Paul & Janet Fredrickson 6112 Ridgeway Rd 922 -3450 1 Ms Patrice Sullivan 6120 Ridgeway Rd 836 -0417 smiley0513 @msn.com 1 Karen & Rich Holetz 6100 Sherman Cir 848 -2040 kholetz @comcast.net 2 Peggy & David Dodge 6117 Sherman Cir 920 -4431 pegdodge @comcast.net 1 Molly Eileen Urbanski O'Shaughnessy 5800 4216 Stuart Ave Sunnyside Rd 926 -1258 920 -9812 urbys @comcast.net oshau001 @umn.edu 1 1 Michael Dunn 4808 Townes Rd 926 -6898 Mikejodunn @comcast.net 1 Kenneth Kjelland 5600 Tracy Ave 2 Mark Aronson 5601 Tracy Ave 929 -5155 1 Richard Conkey 5605 Tracy Ave 1 Kent and Holly Jim and Kathy Michelle & Darrell Gravelle Toth Hart 5609 5621 5708 Tracy Ave Tracy Ave Tracy Ave 922 -8596 612 - 961 -0444 925 -2184 kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com jtoth3 @gmail.com 1 1 2 Thomas Widmark 5712 Tracy Ave 920 -3534 1 Andrea Moonen 5715 Tracy Ave 451 -8718 andrea@jadetcm.com 2 Jason & Michelle Kalenborn 5801 Tracy Ave 922 -4947 jkalenborn @comcast.net 1 Rosemary Sundin 5805 Tracy Ave 1 Rochelle Lackner 5821 Tracy Ave 1 Melvin Gregerson 5909 Tracy Ave 1 Leland & Monica Myhre 6000 Tracy Ave 929 -1581 1 Lance Sanders 6009 Tracy Ave 1 Bruce Utne 6013 Tracy Ave 922 -9188 1 Herman Bains 6101 Tracy Ave 929 -9362 hhbains @aol.com 1 Bill Cosgrove 6104 Tracy Ave 1 John Klus 6105 Tracy Ave 1 Harvey & MaryAnn Havir 6108 Tracy Ave 929 -8725 hhavir @nbs- inc.com 1 Phil & Diana Larson 6109 Tracy Ave plmn777 @comcast.net 1 Scott & Carol Haarstad 6113 Tracy Ave 920 -9093 scott _haarstad @yahoo.com 1 Alexandre Pimkine 6201 Tracy Ave 1 Jack & Dianne Glaeser 6205 Tracy Ave 929 -0900 1 Elaine Tripp 6209 Tracy Ave 922 -7394 1 Delite & Karl Dick 6213 Tracy Ave 929 -1267 2 David and Tami Pries 6613 Tracy Ave 944 -2301 1 Ken ? 5140 Valley View Rd 681 -2674 k2020visionstudios @yahoo.com 1 Tim O'Shaughnessy 6308 Valley View Rd 612 309 -2489 oshag6325 @yahoo.com 3 Cori O'Shaughnessy 6308 Valley View Rd 484 -5448 corioshaughnessy @gmail.com Bryan & Stephanie Rhody 6319 Valley View Rd rhodys @msn.com 1 Jenn Enriquez 6308 Vernon Ave S 763- 807 -3650 1ennEnriquez @yahoo.com 1 Tara Fossum 5920 View Lane 612 - 735 -1171 tourette97 @aol.com 1 Kristin & Jon Engman 5236 W 56th St 1 Kathleen Dahlheimer 4801 W 60th St Kdahlheimer @comcast.net 1 Tracey and Tom Illies 5200 W 61st St 285 -6554 ttillies @aol.com 1 Norbert Domek 5800 W 61st St 929 -8832 1 Marvin Helgeson 5804 W 61st St 1 Page 3 of 4 First Name Last Name Street # . Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs Doug & Bridget Baird Schmidtke Clark 5805 5809 5812 W 61st St W 61st St W 61st St 926 -6818 927 -0959 bridget.baird @target.com ruehleem @hotmail.cm jhoward612 @comcast.net 1 1 1 Tyson & Erin Susan Chip Howard Neuman Peterson Mobarry Wesselman Wilkins Sprague Burns Sutherland Hawks Anderson Carver Kuck Brauer Schedin Allen Hoel Wuebker Keator 5812 5816 5817 5820 5624 4515 4720 5708 6104 6112 6121 6219 6316 6328 6041 5708 6217 6220 5041 W 61st St W 61st St W 61st St W 61st St W 66th St W 70th St W 70th St Warden Ave Westridge Blvd Westridge Blvd Westridge Blvd Westridge Blvd Westwood Court Wilryan Ave Wooddale Ave Wycliffe Rd Wyman Ave Wyman Ave Yvonne Terrace 927 -0959 929-9359 929 -3715 303 -5853 612 - 501 -0252 929 -1560 927 -8390 929 -9687 426 -0202 933 -1441 935 -5322 926 -1126 929 -7382 unlisted 929 -3729 922 -1824 jdwess @comcast.net alleneburns @msn.com nydiacarver @yahoo.com kuckhouse @comcast.net peter_b_brauer @hotmail.com schedvi @hotmail.com johnhoel @mac.com Twebbies @aol.com chickadeedee55 @gmail.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Robert Sally John Jeff Colby Josh Allene & Roy Joyce & Jim Lisa Paul & Julie Nydia Tim & Annette Peter Jim Jim & Elaine John Dennis and Joan Sue Tracked & Recorded Households (above) 184 Untracked Households 61 Total Lawn Signs Posted 245 1— Of the 184 referenced, some residents requested additional signs to give to other interested residents 2 - Of the 184 referenced, some residents requested 2 signs for their corner lot 3 - The 61 untracked resulted from door to door volunteer's not capturing the data 4 — Assumption of two or more adults occupied each home therefore between 368 to 490 residents are represented Page 4 of 4 Countryside Neighborhood Yard Sign Displayers Opposed the Plans of Dec 29, 2010 — March 2010 — May 2010 Hundreds of signs declaring, Save Countryside Neighborhood," have popped up all over Edina. We hope they express the sense of urgency our neighbors and we feel for our neighborhood as well as for all of Edina. We want everyone who loves and appreciates the charm of our neighborhood and city to understand the reasons for our concern and what is at stake for us all. Three of Edina's extraordinary blessings, Bredesen Park and nature preserve, Countryside Park, and the unique landmark of Colonial Church, form the southern boundary of our neighborhood. On February 16, 2010, the Edina City Council gave preliminary approval for Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to build a four -story, 150 -unit apartment facility within this special area. The aerial view above shows how large the intended complex will be. The proposed building is represented by the large red marking. The finer red lines represent the proposed parking. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group neither objects to the church's right to develop its land within current residential zoning and within Edina's comprehensive plan, nor do we object to a senior - living facility. We simply feel the for - profit apartment complex is far too large for a residential neighborhood. Our hope is to convince both the church and developer to reduce the facility to a scale our neighborhood can support, and with a design we can all be proud of. As planned, the apartment building itself will be two football fields in length and nearly 70 -feet high. It will dwarf not only our homes, but all other surrounding structures including the church itself. It will be more than twice the height of the new Edina fire station that it will stand beside, and will overshadow Countryside Park across the street. In addition to the facility, another 75,000 square feet, nearly 2 acres of land, will be used for parking and sidewalks, and more than 300 trees will be cut down. The impact this gigantic project will have on the environment is considerable. The additional traffic it will generate, not only with automobiles of residents, visitors and employees, but in the large number of multi -axle service vehicles necessary to support the facility is also considerable. The short-term, monthly leases suggest a high frequency of moving- trucks. This new heavy traffic will flow around three sides of Countryside Park (and the children and families who play there), which is slated to be extensively upgraded. The park is already bounded by two major arteries, busy Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue. More traffic, more noise, more danger, and more pollution cannot but detract from this special public area. Edina's Comprehensive Plan, adopted to guide the city's future, made clear that while change is inevitable and not to be feared, if properly planned for and managed, change can make Edina even better for the coming years. The key, as our Edina Comprehensive Plan requires, is to assure that development is first and foremost compatible with the neighborhood. By its very magnitude, we strongly feel this planned apartment complex is far too large for the site and the neighborhood. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group hopes to convince the church, the developer and our City Council to reject this plan in favor of one of appropriate proportions. We have a very short window to appeal to the City of Edina, Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to reconsider the scale of this project. Of broader concern for all of Edina is the possibility of Colonial Church, a non - profit organization, gaining approval from the city to change zoning currently calling for residential use to one that would allow for an upscale, for - profit, commercial mega - apartment building in a quiet, residential neighborhood — against the stated wishes of the neighborhood. If allowed in our neighborhood, it can happen anywhere in Edina. Thank you for learning more, and for any help you can provide — whether it be volunteering your time and money to help offset the costs of protecting our neighborhood (and Edina), by signing a petition if you agree with our concerns, by attending neighborhood meetings to get more information, or for your willingness to show your support by placing a sign in your yard to help educate your neighbors. We hope to meet you at our next Neighborhood Meeting! Please click on the 'Attend Meetings' button on our Home Page for a full calendar of events. If you would like to speak with one of your neighbors, please call our phone number at 952 - 929 -1447 (option 4) and leave a message. Someone will call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood As reported by KSTP Channel 5 Eyewitness News on April 15, 2010 ( E) June 23, 2010 Hello City Leaders of Edina and Ms. Hoogenakker, We want the City of Edina Leadership to have a listing of 217 Edina Residents (attached as a separate PDF) who have signed a petition officially marking their opposition to the initial Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation Living Waters Plans, and the current Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 submitted to the City of Edina by the Church and Developer. For the record, there were 30 duplicates on the attachment that were flagged and not counted. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group has worked in good faith with the Developer and Church and unfortunately we have not been able to come up with an acceptable agreement. We ask respectfully for you to reject the plans being presented at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission and July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting, and demand the Church and Developer come up with plans that are more complementary to the symmetry and character of the neighborhood; plans that are more in line in size and scope of the other one and two story buildings in this solely residential area. If you have questions please allow us the opportunity to respond and thank you for the time and consideration. Regards, Kevin McCoy 5809 Jeff Place Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group 0 !1 _ ETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION' '' _ LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION – We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name J ,rte Address/Phone Number -1X09 , .%� V�r oYl N E -Mail l —7& O�� �a1o77 480 k 7_71 3 O� �47 6J ca�rti G n CZ) PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS J LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name -"T ma r S Vo Cla c G- 1 J0 ��3,0 /7 J evl a � ♦a Address/Phone Number l-7-530 3 a S 1-i I `15, ete YL,/ E -Mail sssfKnd S !U 8 �V /� %�- � r�.i/ �ji. c�! / � .o /� u r ti g C'iJ vrt 30� •Ci c�rK %I - w t, 6z ©� cis �t Q � iy®o4 7-e6wec c L w. n., zk If fcc r �i9L,t(c &5cf"oc.Of( it •rte -• ,�.. . ETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Pri t Name Sign ame L Address/Phone Number E -Mail 146� r Corn S+ CZ E'ZNc; � 13 n 57-0 V . /, , n f1 �A A I—Enat -i 15+' Q.) (j) PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name To k� Address/Phone Number Cis 9SL f, -079 8 IN SEE • �` 51 I I rAw A✓ c-, E -Mail Coe, K h0 1t �� _' ETITION REOUESTING MODIFICATION . LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION - We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all, impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Si ame / Address/Phone Number 6 ZQ % SZO 1 L ack to Y A i v-e.., �ko X . (e e • s�r-e -e _�r I al/ ke�le�2 s ��� NL74kaR4 SVZ, iN V J� E -Mail PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION" ) LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be furt4er reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name UPIM M" G � Ma ee,111A -A4-L- ]7owl k y4f 6 NA Address/Phone Number E -Mail Ma PIN NO.. M—Mr, L�Rvl '75d, G_ u. S�2- �� l � ' C �V e. 1 � v► 13 'faet44e - dav,)d,�_re o .��1 M6V/L_�y�efi(c,0SC' Ma PIN NO.. M—Mr, L�Rvl '75d, G_ u. S�2- �� l � ' C �V e. 1 � v► 13 'faet44e - dav,)d,�_re o .��1 , ETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION LIVING WATERS _SENIOR SUBDIVISION) COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Address/Phone Number � (drnst.v. Vi. L ZL11 _�2 CL otey_� A�� /C �_Jf Y - YA Mi 1 i E -Mail 44) er �� ISCd dYtLfS�� n� PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION:. ) LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail i-�, le, M Nt 14 ► ,p slob Avzo wt_ . owJ T( i ye- cam v - �,� ► ► �� I 59 0& f-ky -!00 ,,,;r P V f- 5th o Cow kl-1s,C)j 1?6( 9S 41 1 Z -144 fjGt,rL 4,L- .;1UfC lWA60 UWC44- Get" 1 b VICAN bb(9g" a_C, ETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name c/e 5�� (S)L56 tj J Address/Phone Number E -Mail 5 z o Q y ;P.< � Lo - r7st- � 666 oocmtktd h 1 ok4 z- Y---f (�O_ o. Cop c� (Jove GL� C,o�2 (�4KS�h d ram ,� ri� ' 7 PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT -- March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Address/Phone Number E -Mail X25 44 ffk2f -C? AZ - �1 ZTITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONc W IVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISIONI COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT —March 10 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name 1 5 Sign Name 16S_ I ;C r, -J ►� 1Ovjr u. Address/Phone Number E -Mail /704, JTD 7q �O C At 1 �a� Ali�t ��`'�111► -:J 1 111 l l,': y1�1 ` , q -{ P i. C w. �� ao -Cor PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS 'lw LIVING W A'FEKS NE! COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT —March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted -by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely .that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. � Print Name Si Nam Address/Phone Number E -Mail ETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONF,` LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH P ' OJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will periodically exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name I muid WA_ 1� (,Qc ..I -Le_t_ Address/Phone Number OR E -Mail 5`701 /- t�.tll��f' l�y �S- Lam- -l/ z /.- Cei1 r I is h 7a9�Ma il.m /j", 61 zU T41 mm ktlx II-L�ti` PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION J LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISIONi COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name S, Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail ` __P I �Z l � �..�' r-,� �� l�l u - �,c�h� ►1 h r�dr�J�rnc►O�s%e 011 /� ✓f �9fa1.9,7/r-�7JS .[�O W anzi 1461-Ak-n-, i/� Y 1• �D I� d 1 ��/'VR/� �(��I �l:J 'u''yl�i� W I I 1 �o )Z // Aw"S;, ,1, e r+-ki�,, SQ k,& ��nd-u. edit, i ETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION; LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDMSIONi COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION - We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail P00421 Lr l a s / �,p6 -y," ly4i -mil 4 c o t t �• C.j M ce mo "_ tx Y- L%, Rs'z -` 2.1 T-0- � b) o 0 Ai-&.9 u e Lr 5 81.2 W (v l S S� gSa_gj_1 -ors9 6 w c�o6t c WN lie gSZ 76 PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATION° 7 LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/... COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will periodically exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name / Signn Name 4 " Address/Phone Number ( do / t ff:�, le,v -- . E -Mail tETITION RE VESTING MODIFICATION',' LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT - March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding- buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail v John Ravrlen A nre Mc-Coti 562-9 Jed{' �PlzoZ q2 �I -t�3 .�12r� C0MG2!st,Kti 5109 Ae.f-C P(aQ °1 2_$ -91L(O 0`hv\f me -O!1e cpvv\C0,4.- l \' PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS I LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PxOJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address -the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Vamg 11 I Address/Phone Number E -Mail W �3Z>/� �-t 52 --mod z 3 W 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email ' rc AC Ie C17L3 e�e Ij - At. I- I / I 2. . ) c: c 3. f11 Rai R-0 D L,` L) (QZDI tr 1115 t�� 4�i.e 5. 6. d- 7. s. �e 9 �= 10. K�ei�, �0�}' �QIC2►�; �r�J - - / /// /I/ 4 13 b CerPI CUS 1 h ld -06-7- 3,13 i l �� LOD I,) 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name 1. Address Email Fe as r57i7-d P— q,"a;l, ccn, 2. (-),,y N 5 �l13 �varc� i,''� ��'u a,C da /1c 4t) 61 10. !7 Z� 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email %ti ll� 2. J 3. _s yPrN_QO. (_ crn E�C. '6, C Cerv<<R S7 , n;E) 5. t 6. 8. f 9, ( /b 10. (J�(�lie X56P1 -0 0 rev, ,n CcYv�cas he f ni � ,,, c - sf. n e1 �hS ?Con?C�s/ ne4_ i . y 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. - 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email 1. S('�• 06V 2C. C�c�,,,uia . hey I. 4. 5. 6. �a 2 ��rz- S Sz y doff 9(c, Q-5, 9 S a 4 9"a Qr �Q ti ) os&Q 5 *4 8 9 Mg. 7. Jr 9,� t. 10. J ✓ Gv ,, c. vwwl S S 4 3 �? ri j 17Y -U=-' R311Y ✓q itry V; e�w Kct I �S�L, _; �Ic L 1 (5 V 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email d �P (A �_ I %. 8. 9,_ 10. g-7 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email n, 1. - , 60 , 6. VI LAi l'r 7. 8. 9,_ 10. 7� COMIDIde Address Eb2aff Ste OJA 1:#J.IIJ ��,q3t, 1?4jol 60f?Rlsjo(zpt6L, Cowl xf�" . - 2. ISS �2- L J-4 3. Mud ma 1% Let- I (1 co YV% 3e .9 37 7Tmf 7. o rj , !�837 -S4. vj,VabWiSb-n.S(R or"44sii n4.-t 8,11 7Tb*nnSof.j V— . vo �� YJ PETITION OPPOSING LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT If the Edina Planning Commission and City Council give final approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football fields wide to be located near the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Highway 62 (behind the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of central Edina will be changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy Avenue and the surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to -this project and request that the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. Name 1. tN1 6e- AVE-A-Lj_ 2. C1 / --lq J-o n -e. `, , M 111110 104 MAI EA 0 WE ME 13 14 Address Email SG09 74AcY AVE. AL1 4 ktNA- 6 PAVE- LL: @AOL.CoNi Dr-lec ke-d e- le�-r Ile crane asi Mk, 1(01A lkJ 5117m!y-/OY i'�ar. s6os -1 ov::z A-iC,0A e Ica , h 6.4. I 56hd t-a.' # & G1111V1 vs � �'-- SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT If the Edina Planning Commission and City Council give approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIvISON/COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football 6 fiheella wide to be located near the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Eg Edina will hi the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of be the changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy that surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to this project and request the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. Name Address Email . G�►T1� >I.� 1�.� C .. _1 ►1 16. EaIC hiv'avr oJ` 17. iUd ', �k I�� ag w; AS `I3 18. av YL 20. L"—'V � —OJ �2.� - , 21. a,Y t1 e. I VTR' 22. 23 . � yen rnru- - k- ci,V"') S Uzi 24. ' 25. A AA KRN -ITbo X4 27.:.. (4 k 2s. ate' y, u�1�rn / SZ 1 L1111V1•.\lVV _ llµ�/J.l /L11yl1.bVVb1V.VVl1Y 118L11/:.•• 4W11\ V /V.I./T i1V.,W.1V.• ..LMA...1 ... PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address /Phone Number E -Mail 1 of 2 - gas 0 im3/2 /3' On Fri, 6/18/10, Kent Gravelle <kentgravelle@gravellelaw.com> wrote: From: Kent Gravelle <kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com> Subject: Most Colonial members live out -of -town To: "Katie Mintz" <kmintz @acnpapers.com> Date: Friday, June 18, 2010,1:26 PM Dear Editor, The letter from Mr. Holderness stating that most Colonial members are Edina citizens is untrue. Looking at Colonial's membership directory, they have 1,258 members with only 445 living in Edina. That equals 35 %. Furthermore, Colonial Church is very liberal on who they list as a member because my wife, Holly, is listed as a member as well and neither she nor I have ever attended services at Colonial on more than two occasions. Finally, the correction on page 8 of the June 17th Sun is actually incorrect where it states that forestland will not be destroyed in building the assisted living center. City officials have testified before the planning commission that 333 trees and shrubs will have to be destroyed to make way for the building and the plans on the city's website clearly show that most of the proposed building site is currently forested. Sincerely, Kent Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 Home: (952) 922 -8596 / PS COLONIAL CHURCH 6200 Colonial Way Edina, Minnesota 55436 Office: (952) 925 -2711 Fax: (952) 925 -1591 Website: www.colonialchurch.org 2009 41 Anderson, Rochelle and David Smeltzer; Beth, Sarah 1817 Essex Road Minnetonka MN 55305 -1832 (952) 546 -7470 Anderson, Ryan 7140 Derby Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 -9288 Anderson, Steve and Annette; Michelle, Sara 7008 Mark Terrace Drive Edina MN 55439 -1626 (952) 941 -5169 Anderson, Tom 10252 Upton Place Bloomington MN 55431 (952) 882 -0074 Anderson, Victoria 8308 Creekside Circle Bloomington MN 55437 -3838 Andresen, Angie; Max & Maggie Yuhas 6000 Oaklawn Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1922 (952) 926 -1402 Arblsi, Cynthia 14401 Atrium Way #112 Minnetonka MN 55345 -4717 (952) 933 -5550 Arblsl, Sarah 6125 Chasewood Pkwy #200 Minnetonka MN 55343 -4377 (952) 933 -2510 Arnold, Shelley Route 5 St. Cloud MN 56304 -9805 Arnold, Sheryl; Adam 6411 Barrie Road Edina MN 55435 -2301 (952) 835 -4896 /q/ Anderson, Don and Penny A 129 15th Avenue North Hopkins MN 55343 -7352 Ahrens, Jim and Susan; (952) 935 -9482 Fred 5844 Girard Court Anderson, Doris Minneapolis MN 55419 -2137 5424 Kellogg Avenue (612) 243 -9692 Edina MN 55424 -1603 (952) 922 -4459 Alexander, Shirley 5600 Hillside Court Anderson, Greg and Julie; Edina MN 55439 Scott, Katie, Maggie (952) 941 -4720 4212 Oakdale Avenue Edina MN 55416 -5034 Allard, Lindsay and Katelynn (952) 927 -9572 13775 Chestnut Drive #102 Eden Prairie MN 55344 -6760 Anderson, Joyce (952) 945 -0251 808 West 57th Street Minneapolis MN 55419 -1730 Allard, Pete and Jean (612) 869 -5326 8425 Rosewood Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 -6606 Anderson, Margaret (952) 473 -5752 5501 Dewey Hill Road Minneapolis MN 55439 Alldredge, Bill and Kari (952) 943 -2259 4602 Edina Boulevard Edina MN 55424 -1153 Anderson, Marlea (952) 928 -8568 517 2nd Ave. NW Maple Grove MN 55369 Allemong, Sharon 6328 Falcon Court Anderson, Matt and Kris; Edina MN 55435 -1902 Noah, Bjorn, Isaac, Oskar ' (952) 922 -9140 5800 South Drive Edina MN 55436 Allen, Chad (952) 929 -1325 1333 Wagon Wheel Road Hopkins MN 55343 Anderson, Matt and Megan; (612) 363 -4212 Brady 4436 West 140th Street Altman, Andrea Savage MN 55378 -3023 8280 Mitchell Road (952) 882 -0010 Eden Prairie MN 55347 (952) 934 -2263 Anderson, Randy 3604 33rd Avenue NE Anderson, Craig and Jo Ann St Anthony MN 55418 4550 Ranchview Lane North (763) 559 -9227 Plymouth MN 55446 -2128 Anderson, Robert and Thea Anderson, Dan and Kristin 5510 Gideons Lane 3837 38th Avenue South Shorewood MN 55331 -3357 1 Minneapolis MN 55406 -3409 (952) 474 -4984 - (651) 336 -1186 41 Anderson, Rochelle and David Smeltzer; Beth, Sarah 1817 Essex Road Minnetonka MN 55305 -1832 (952) 546 -7470 Anderson, Ryan 7140 Derby Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 -9288 Anderson, Steve and Annette; Michelle, Sara 7008 Mark Terrace Drive Edina MN 55439 -1626 (952) 941 -5169 Anderson, Tom 10252 Upton Place Bloomington MN 55431 (952) 882 -0074 Anderson, Victoria 8308 Creekside Circle Bloomington MN 55437 -3838 Andresen, Angie; Max & Maggie Yuhas 6000 Oaklawn Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1922 (952) 926 -1402 Arblsi, Cynthia 14401 Atrium Way #112 Minnetonka MN 55345 -4717 (952) 933 -5550 Arblsl, Sarah 6125 Chasewood Pkwy #200 Minnetonka MN 55343 -4377 (952) 933 -2510 Arnold, Shelley Route 5 St. Cloud MN 56304 -9805 Arnold, Sheryl; Adam 6411 Barrie Road Edina MN 55435 -2301 (952) 835 -4896 /q/ Bergman, John and Lorelei; Jesse 954 Nine Mile Cove East Hopkins MN 55343 -7724 (952) 941 -0979 Bergman, Kim and Debra Magnuson; Billy 11174 Burr Ridge Lane Eden Prairie MN 55347 -4710 (952) 829 -0223 Berkley, Gail; Zoie, Abby 5508 Warden Avenue Edina MN 55436 -2241 (952) 929 -1378 Berkley, Jay and Nadine Freindship Village 8100 Highwood Drive #G310 Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 830 -9571 Berndt, Kris 1011 Feltl Court # 529 Hopkins MN 55343 (952) 473 -9987 Berry, Janet 777 Excelsior Boulevard #210 Excelsior MN 55331 -1938 (952) 474 -2350 Berzlns, Otto 3818 Grand Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55409 -1233 (612) 823 -0099 Bettger, Brittany 2799 Rustic Place #109 Little Canada MN 55117 Bettin, Roger and Carolyn 300 Fairway Court Atlantis FL 33462 (561) 967 -0643 Bieber, Bill and Helen Meyer 6504 Stauder Circle Edina MN 55436 (952) 473 -6341 Biewald, Margie 5704 Hansen Road Edina MN 55436 -2405 (952) 929 -5267 Birdwell, Roger and Deidre; John, Jennifer 16639 Interlachen Blvd Lakeville MN 55044 (952) 891 -1775 Eli Birt, Michael and Ann Boller, Max and Jane 6367 Chasewood Drive 6112 Kaymar Drive Eden Prairie MN 55344 -3244 Edina MN 55436 -1211 (952) 941 -6446 (952) 933 -5199 Bishop, Helene Boller, Nicole and Danni 6425 Warren Avenue South 9716 Caveile Ave S Edina MN 55439 -1245 Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 941 -3186 ! Bolton, Jane Bishop, Jim and Kathy;- 1 15385 60th Avenue North Tyler, Abbey Plymouth MN 55446 2 Circle East (952) 426-0408 Edina MN 55436 -1311 (952) 920 -0186 Bolvin, Theodore 5125 Sherdian Avenue Bixby, Ned and Marlene Edina MN 55410 -2238 6925 Moccasin Valley Road (612) 926 -2668 Edina MN 55439 -1630 (952) 944 -2935 Boman, Jack and Lillian 2401 West 98th Street B)erken, Richard and Bonnie Bloomington MN 55431 -2803 18118 Cattail Court (952) 881.7055 Eden Prairie MN 55346 -2159 (952) 975 -3833 Boraas, Sharon 6300 West 39th Street 1 Blake, Janet St Louis Park MN 55416 -2705 6684 Picha Place (952) 928 -7963 Eden Prairie MN 55346 Borchers, Peter and Kelly Blankenship, Jacob 10704 Zinran Cir S 5240 Oaklawn Avenue S. Bloomington MN 55438 Edina MN 55424 -1307 (952) 944 -2385 (952) 926 -2107 Borgen, Christopher and Janette Blelse, Vikki 4711 Nicollet Ave Apt 301 412 Coventry Lane Minneapolis MN 55419 Edina MN 55435 -5637 (952) 893 -2997 Borst, Jeff and Stacie; Max, Jackson, Weston Blood, Davy +-f at?d Betty 4820 Aspaisa Lane f ?'6 Stein e! Uike Lane 4211 Edina MN 55435 4070 Victoria NIN _`,5386.7716 (952) 920 -5077 (952):937 -2379 Bourne, Douglas and Nancy; Bloom, Jo-I I Joseph, Matthew, Jaime 7103 Plrasrvrii A . S k.i no forwarding address rJlinneiiliDlis MN 55404 Bowlby, Catherine Bochert, Mike and Kay 7533 Pillsbury Avenue 213 Coventry Court Richfield MN 55423 -4118 Edina MN 55435 -5636 (612) 798 -4775 (952) 933 -6640 Bowles, Bill and Judie Bohlig, Charles and Diane 6300 Red Fox Lane 5200 Ridge Road Edina MN 55436 -1924 Edina MN 55436 -1079 (952) 935 -9208 (952) 933 -0924 Bowles, Jane - Bolger, Charles and Gail; 405 10th Avenue N.W. #202 Chriatine, Bryan South St Paul MN 55075 -4238 5601 St. Andrews Avenue (651) 450 -9268 Edina MN 55424 -1536 (612) 590 -8713 I :I 43 — Buth, Charles and Jan 4700 Sunnyside Road Edina MN 55424 -1106 (952) 927 -9278 Buxton, Roger and Peggy 7500 Cahill Road #117 Edina MN 55439 -2790 (952) 941 -8465 Byhre, Aaron and Verity; Natalie, Sebastian 5721 Fairfax Ave Edina MN 55424 (952) 303 -4994 C Caldwell, Renee 12501 Nicollet Ave Unit 322 Burnsville MN 55337 (952) 736 -0366 Calvert, Kim 12015 Galixie Avenue Apple Valley MN 55124 -7318 Calvert, Scott and Carrie; Kyle, Ryan 12765 Foliage Ave Apple Valley MN 55124 (952) 997 -6264 Campbell, Nicole 705 Kingsview Lane North Plymouth MN 55447 -4329 (763) 449 -9501 Canfield, Frank and Karin 10418 Tuscany Way Eden Prairie MN 55347 -4861 (952) 941 -7429 Carlone, Fred and Janet; Terri 8732 Woodcliff Road Bloomington MN 55438 -1555 (952) 944 -7508 Carlone, Loretta 5250 Vernon Avenue South #501 Edina MN 55436 -2162 (952) 920 -5359 Carisen, Mary Friendship Village 8106 Highwood Drive #Y308 Bloomington MN 55438 -3034 (952) 830 -9758 I Carlson, Jackie 5602 Bimini Drive Minnetonka MN 55343 -9432 (952) 935 -1243 Carlson, Roger and Janet -Ruth 4729 Washburn Avenue South Minnepolis MN 55410 (763) 559 -7177 Carpenter, Charlie and Ton's; Justin, Sam 5516 Countyside Road Edina MN 55436 (952) 929 -1166 Carpenter, Joe and Jennie; Annie, Audrey, Gus 6146 Artic Way Edina MN 55436 (952) 935 -1537 Carrier, Tom and Anne 600 2nd Street South #303 Minneapolis MN 55401 -2156 (612) 340 -1996 Carroll, Joe and Caroline Ullom 5945 Walnut Drive Edina MN 55436 (612) 245 -5781 Carteng, Gunnar Bywood E Healthcare Ctr 3427 Central Avenue NE Minneapolis MN 55418 -1505 Carthaus, Marcia 6213 Parkwood Road Edina MN 55436 -1140 (952) 935 -9057 Catt, Krissy; Olivia, Alexis 6601 Ridgeview Drive Edina MN 55439 (952) 947 -0094 Cavanor, Betty 4350 Brookside Court #218 Edina MN 55436 -1457 (952) 922 -6961 Cavanor, Paul and Stephanie; Devin, Conor, Keenan 5107 Arden Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1317 (952) 922 -9682 Cerf, Larry and Karan; Ellen, Caroline, Anna 6312 Loch Moor Drive Edina MN 55439 -1620 (952) 829 -7606 Cerf, Peter 6712 Wooddale Avenue South Edina MN 55435 -1633 (952) 925 -1548 Chalgouzova, Marzia 10041 Penn Avenue South #206 Bloomington MN 55431 Chapman, Walter Jr and Lockie 5816 Arbour Avenue Edina MN 55436 (952) 926 -1752 Charles, Jay and Stephanie; Julia, Miley 9309 134th Street Savage MN 55378 -2103 (952) 445 -9360 Cherico, John 8054 Erie Spur Chanhassen Mt Chochrek, Suzanne; Jay, Wyatt 4035 W 65th #321 Edina MN 55435 (952) 681 -2493 Chochrek, Tom; Jay, Wyatt 6617 Londonderry Drive Edina MN 55436 -1720 (952) 936 -9117 Chollar, Andy and Libby Soderberg; r Sam, Sarah 3826 Haven Road Minnetonka MN 55345 -2369 (952) 933 -7763 Christiansen, i ., r; :r <i Swu 7701 Stonewood Court (952)946 -6976 Churchill. Ccrost'RD( V 5:27 451h Place Noill Minneapolis MN 554"18,5104 (763) 535-6890 Clark, Chris; Tommy, Katie 6800 Chapel Lane (612) 618 -0400 45 / 90 Danzberger, Alex Jr and Shelley; Maddie 4815 Sheridan Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55410 -1918 (612) 926 -0056 Darling, Annie and Gayle Kvistad 3618 West 44th Street Minneapolis MN 55410 -1366 (612) 926 -8349 Dauka, Rita; Inta Magons 2654 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park MN 55416 -1727 (952) 285 -9817 Davidson, Rob and Jane; John, Andrew, Peter, Stephen 6 Circle East Edina MN 55436 -1313 (952) 922 -0375 Davies, Rick and Carolyn 7012 Tupa Drive Edina MN 55439 -1642 (952) 944 -0614 Davis, Barbara 6009 Arbour Lane Edina MN 55436 -2526 (952) 920 -9467 Davis, Christopher and Margaret; Owen 6012 Kaymar Drive Edina MN 55436 (952) 938 -6197 Davis, John and Carrie 6320 Red Fox Lane Edina MN 55436 -1924 (952) 926 -4071 Dawson, Lisa 3820 Oakdale Avenue North Robbinsdale MN 55422 -2909 Day, Kristin; Sophie Sissi 6013 Birchcrest Drive Edina MN 55435 -2625 (952) 920 -0333 Deal, Dara 5625 Tracy Avenue Edina MN 55436 -2232 (952) 925 -0994 Dean, Bill and Ch11s; Jake, Charles 4745 Dupont Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55419 -5323 (612) 823 -5247 Deanovic, Deborah 5116 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina MN 55436 Decker, Beth 1991 Sargent Avenue _ St Paul MN 55105 -1533 Delecki, Brenda 4605 Edina Blvd Edina MN 55424 (952) 929 -8427 Delianedis, Daniel and Christina; Vicky, Lily 4624 Drexel Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1132 (952) 922 -8121 Delmont, Timothy 4105 Colfax Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55409 -1427 (612) 825 -6742 DeLoss, Jud and Joanne; Ford, Josey 6414 McCaluley Circle Minneapolis MN 55439 (952) 303 -5748 Dempsey, Kerrwin and Kathleen; Jake, Kelly, Teddy 4379 Brook Avenue South Edina MN 55424 -1011 (952) 929 -2285 Denson, Barb; Samie Habib, Noelle Habib, Nadia Habib 15625 Darling Path Rosemount MN 55068 -4604 Deris, Aaron and Tom 10734 Cavell Road Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 380 -6978 Devereaux, Lois 4636 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55407 -3632 (612) 722 -8439 Diaz, Karen; Olivia 13304 Loveland Circle Minnetonka MN 55305 (952) 681 -2470 Diebold, Frances 10716 McCool Drive West Burnsville MN 55337 -4087 Diebold, Jay 17605 Susan Drive Minnetonka MN 55345 (952) 220 -0280 47 Dietzier, Dennis and Linda; Justin, Christian 7212 Cornelia Drive Edina MN 55435 -4160 (952)897 -0774 Dike[, Nevin and Michele Gatian; Garret Gatian Dikei, Renyard Gatien 2214 Cedar Lake Parkway Minneapolis MN 55416 (612) 925 -4983 Dille, Troy; Troy 3709 W 83rd Street Bloomington MN 55431 -1018 (952) 922 -2922 DiNardo, Mike and K.C. 4625 43rd Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55406 -4018 (612) 724 -3931 Dinham, Ross and Shirley 6511 Knox Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55423 -1150 (612) 869 -0784 Dinneen, Margo and Jon Zoller 10301 Cedar Lake Road #217 Minnetonka MN 55305 -3254 (952) 542 -1185 Disbrow, Dede; Carl Hensel 6401 Willow Wood Road Edina MN 55436 -1017 (952) 933 -3119 Dixon, Barbara 7244 York Ave S #326 Edina MN 55435 -4491 (952) 922 -9057 Dixon, John and Suzanne; Mike, Liz, Jennifer 5720 Camelback Drive Edina MN 55436 -1706 (952) 939 -9071 Dobles, Ron and Carole 5000 Halifax Avenue #307 Edina MN 55424 -1417 (952) 929 -6538 Dodge, David and Peggy; Jesse 6117 Sherman Circle Edina MN 55436 (952) 920 -4431 Dominquez, Olga 4431 Garrison Lane Edina MN 55424 -1846 (952)926 -0421_ 0 M / E92- Endle, Donna Erickson, Stephen and Marilyn Feyder, Joe and Pat 9950 Bluebird St #108 5515 Gideons Lane 5916 Saint John's Avenue Coon Rapids MN 55433 Shorewood MN 55331 -3357 Edina MN 55424 -1831 (612) 242 -2538 (952) 401 -3349 (952) 920 -0497 Enfield, Mary 10000 Maple Circle Bloomington MN 55431 -2870 (952) 884 -0045 Engel - Douma, Kristina and Thomas Douma; Halley 14668 Carriage Lane N.E. Prior Lake MN 55378 -1170 Engkjer, Sarah and Jason; Hayden 5936 12th Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55417 -3210 (612) 708 -1399 Englund, Bette 5605 Chowen Avenue South Edina MN 55410 -2345 (952) 927 -9942 Epple, Mark and Karen; Jake, Zoe, Soren 5336 Kellogg Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1305 (952) 929 -7344 Erbele, David and Mary 10805 Hyland Terrace Eden Prairie MN 55344 -4076 (952) 942 -5436 Erdall, Steve and Karen; Kevin, Brooks 5808 West 61 st Street Edina MN 55436 -1930 (952) 922 -5479 Erickson, Barbara 1373 Belmont Lane West St. Paul MN 55113 -5801 (651) 636 -7769 Erickson, Harland and June 9550 Collegeview Road #226 Bloomington MN 55437 (952) 944 -9209 Erickson, Kirby and Katie White 8309 West 93rd Street Bloomington MN 55438 -1403 (952) 826 -0959 Erickson, Paul and Kari 11501 Ridgemount Ave. W Minneapolis MN 55305 Ericson, Scott and Connie; Laura, Holly, David 5928 Walnut Drive Edina MN 55436 -1750 (952) 938 -2123 Ernst, Charlie and Maxine 4621 Washburn Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55410 -1847 (612) 927 -6391 Esterley, Diane 9596 Brighton Lane Eden Prairie MN 55347 -3128 (952) 974 -2544 F Fagerstrom, Dorothy 1235 Archer Lane North Plymouth MN 55447 -3108 (763) 475 -0292 Fairley, Dan and Debby; James, Peter, John 7008 Lee Valley Circle Edina MN 55439 -1826 (952) 935 -7902 Fancher, Greg and Caroline; Drew, Daniel 4247 Grimes Avenue St. Louis Park MN 55416 -4020 (952) 925 -2204 Fast, Chris 4101 Morningside Road Edina MN 55416 (651) 785 -5092 Feldman, Peter 20804 Vernon Avenue Prior Lake MN 55372 Ferguson, Cynthia 542 Lincoln Ave #102 St Paul MN 55102 -2837 Fertig, Dan and Carol; Danielle 5705 Hansen Road Edina MN 55436 -2404 (952) 929 -1329 Feyder, Andy and Becky; Belen 983 Avon Street St Paul MN 55103 -1301 49 Fieger, Jim and Karen 19927 Waterford Court Shorewood MN 55331 (952) 935 -4159 Field, Charlotte 901 Feltl Ct #304 Edina MN 55436 -2346 (952) 926 -6190 Field, Jack and Karen; Kate, Laura, Emma 5965 Eureka Road Shorewood MN 55331 -8937 (952) 470 -4713 Findell, Roger and Jo 6334 Halifax Avenue South Edina MN 55424 -1916 (952) 927 -4620 Findorff, Jeffrey and Betsy; Nathan 6442 Xenium Lane North Maple Grove MN 55311 -3636 (763) 559 -6439 Fink, John and Cindy; Kathryn Peters, Allie Peters, Reka 5029 Wooddale Lane Edina MN 55424 -1325 (952) 922 -3718 Finn, John III and Lynn; Molly, Whitney, John 2701 Hidden Creek Lane Wayzata MN 55391 -2559 Finsaas, Ken and Anhe- Marie; Megan, Luke, Nicole 14180 47th Ave North Plymouth MN 55446 -3475 (763) 551 -9825 Fisher, Jim and Mary 11140 Washburn Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55431 -3832 (952) 884 -2641 Fix, Ralph and Eva; Hayley 6601 Cahill Road Edina MN 55439 -1306 (952) 944 -6706 Fochler, Kate; Libby, Jane 235 Holly Road Hopkins MN 55343 -8515 (952) 935 -1786 (9 1- / 9y Gatian, Michele and Nevin Dikel; Gibbs, Beth; Gobel, Fred and Suzanne Garret Gatian Dikei, Renyard Gatien Piper, Max 506 River Street 2214 Cedar Lake Parkway 5301 Glenbrae Court Minneapolis MN 55401 -2542 Minneapolis MN 55416 Edina MN 55436 -2020 (612) 822 -6008 (612) 925 -4983 (952) 924 -0185 _ Goedde, Gregg and Jennifer; Gaynor, Gaynor and Carmella Gibbs, Paul Samantha, Stephanie 8574 Morgan Lane 10460 Palm Street N.W. 18171 Lake Forest Cir Eden Prairie MN 55347 Coon Rapids MN 55433 -6513 Lakeville MN 55044 (612) 803 -3547 Gee, David and Jan; Gilbert, Vivian Matthew, Michaela 5800 St. Croix Ave N #C303 ; Golden, John and Emily Eaton; 6725 Sioux Trail Golden Valley MN 55422 -4685 1 Oscar, Julian Edina MN 55439 -1054 1 4241 Dupont Ave. S (952) 943 -2158 Gilchrist, Bill Minneapolis MN 55409 5545 Warden Avenue (952) 842 -8116 Geer, Brad and Kristin; Edina MN 55436 -2240 Gabriella (952) 920 -4267 Goldstein, David and Mary; 5808 Northwood Drive Jonathon, Ben, Anna Edina MN 55436 -2056 Giltner, Gary and Suzanne; 4509 Bruce Avenue (952) 926 -0741 Luke, Josh, Carrie E:.,lu;,, I:!. I ii`_•1.'_= 11:.x'1 8433 Amsden Ridge Drive 1912),921-0321 Geer, Chuck and Barb Bloomington MN 55438 -1416 5812 Northwood Drive (952) 941 -8793 Golterman, Carl and Joann Edina MN 55436 -2056 122 18th Avenue North (952) 929 -8123 Glovannetti, Paula South St Paul MN 55075 -1836 9630 Independence Circle, Unit 106 (651) 455 -1470 Genari, Gwen Niskanen Chanhassen MN 55317 -4693 PO BOX 427 Golterman, Carla Chanhassen MN 55317 -0427 Girard, Gcru and oa;rn;t ':it;t;s 1433 8th Ave South (952) 949 -3621 Kel. Snon. t,u +u ar South St Paul MN 55075 -3317 6005 F?i; ch'. E:: ; C't ivy (651) 455 -4276 George, Brenda F +iin;; ;:tN 55' 800 Walnut PL Apt 216 (952) 922.0068 Good, 1) •r n1 Chaska MN 55318 PO Box 1318:3' Gisselbeck..J::£N trr (? .i St Paul TAN E *i 3 GC;S'I> Germann, Judy Hattie: (651) 767 -0218 1042 Whitney Drive Apple Valley MN 55124-9140 I r :s: Iv1t•I .,5: ^` Gbotlermont, Ra11dy (952) 432 -2892 (952) 922 -6312 61391 MeacliFwhrook, ShId #;a�5 St LOOS Palk ININ 95.1213 Gesche, Jay; Givens. Fury (952) 594 -415-' Andre, Justin, Spenser Gesche -Hage 825 summit f,.•enue z 115 16629 Canterbury Drive h!inr"0F1D0li> MN 5540 3 -? 16' Goodnow, rAaiW Minnetonka MN 55345 -2617 8955 Neill Lake R0_1 f (952) 215 -8774 Glaser, (,'hiv (lEit+::'y: Eden Praia: N ^I 55- ."iYlr Jon alhar. Lind<,;;:'. Start Getchell, Jim and Claudia 620.4 i;tsr: Gs r..! ; Goodnow, William and 9214 Breckenridge Lane L iliri.:, NAN ' 5:'::1; •1149+ Susan Wheeler Goodnow Eden Prairie MN 55347 -3443 6217 Fox Meadow Lane (952) 934 -0411 Glaser, K.C. Edina MN 55436 6133 Mildred Ae= ?nt.,e Getchell, Thomas and Linda Eainei NIIq 5C:a39 1-1 60 Grabham, Doug and Lonnie 8514 West 97th Street 1602) 720-5881 6496 Mere Drive . Bloomington MN 55438 Eden Prairie MN 55346 -2318 Glaser, Tom - Hane, Thomas Sr. and Marjoriel-ee; Harrington, Dan and Molly: Hayes, Mary Tom, Lollie Lee Paige. Nelsen 2798 Autumnwood Lane 4920 Sunnyside Road 6506 Wilryan Avenue SUU111 Minnetonka ION 55305-3487 Edina MN 55424 -1110 Edina IAN 55439.1455 ('952) 544 -1165 (952) 922 -5748 (952) 946 -1103 Heatii, Evelyn Hank, Mark and Jenni; Harris, Larry and Jane; 5500:. i3oorie Avenue [forth. 422 Sarah, Rachel Emily Minneapolis MN 55428 -3629 5225 Duggan Plaza 3000 St. Albans Hill Road #115 ! (763)'592-4440 Edina MN 55439 Minneapolis MN 55305 (952) 941 -8262 1 (952) 544 -0328 Heise(, Nancy 8400 Pennsylvania Road #224 Hansen, Dawn; Harrison, David and Jan Oloomitig<on MN 55436 -1199 Jessica Graves, Emily Graves 357 Hemline Ave S (952) 829.0456 18575 Azure Road St Paul MN 55105 Deephaven MN 55391 -3112 (952) 933 -0105 Holtzman, Michael and Jcnntlo-v: (952) 473 -6105 Henry Hartfeldt, Shawn 1954 MontreatAvenue Hansen, Eric and Karri; 7472 Cahill Road SI NO MN:55116 X069 Rick Edina MN 55439 -2732 (651)'699 -8855 5212 Glengarry Parkway Edina MN 55436 -2004 Hartwell, Lucy He.lgeson, Bill and (952) 926 -7559 520 Indian Mound St #2A Tess Wayzata MN 55391 725'5ts1 Street East Hansen, Karen (952) 473 -9474 t'�9inijea.polis NiN 515417 6434 City West Parkway #6303 (612) 729 -9232 Eden Prairie MN 55344 Hartz, Karen 9447 Marshall Road Helmich, Nancy Hansen, Matthew and Brittany; Eden Prairie MN 55347 -4197 4115 Surton Lane Madeline (952) 906 -0525 rtirinnsc,polis MN .55.106 -3637 5629 Chowen Ave S (612) 722 -0369 Edina MN 55410 -2345 Hatch, Tom Jr and Barb; John, Ryan, Robbie Heltne, Charlaine Hanson, Greg and Maria; 6504 Navaho Trail 10106 Girard Avenue South Lizzie Edina MN 55439 -1138 Bloomington MN 55431 -3113 7482 Cahill road (952) 944 -1343 (952) 881 -2910 =.: ire tovi 55439 Hauser, lone Heltne, Rick and Elaine; Hanson, Jack and Barbara 1337 Jurdy Road Brett, Erik 70 Garden Drive Eagan MN 55121 -2108 6040 Sheridan Avenue South Burnsville MN 55337 -4145 Edina MN 55410 -2914 (952) 431 -3968 Hausker, Charles (612) 929 -5222 9836 Belmont Lane Hanson, Sandra Eden Prairie MN 55347 Hemstad, Karen; 739 Echo Shores Court Erik, Noah Mahtomedi MN 55115 -1473 Hautala, Jim 6024 Shane Drive (651) 748 -1451 10143 Kaitlin Avenue Edina MN 55439 -1758 Hanover MN 55341 -4501 (952) 828 -8191 Hargreaves, Evelyn (Buppy) Friendship Village Havens, Janet Henderson, David and Kris; 8102 Highwood Drive #13135 1 2925 Princeton Avenue Ryan, Erin, Megan Bloomington MN 55438 -1047 Minneapolis MN 55416 -1956 6537 Ridgeview Drive (952) 830 -9497 (952) 926 -1516 Edina MN 55439 -1234 (952) 944 -9326 Hargrove, Joel; Havens, Rachel Lucy Snowberg 1456 Eastlake Drive I Hendricks, Bob and Julie; 5529 Welcome Avenue North Chaska MN 55318 -2615 Molly, Cody, Brooke Crystal MN 55429 -3128 6016 West 105th Street (612) 203 -3621 Haverstock, Alice Bloomington MN 55438 -1832 8820 Minnetonka Boulevard (952) 918 -0110 Hargrove, Linda; St Louis Park MN 55426 -2935 Amanda Hendrickson, Sheri 5529 Welcome Avenue North Hayes, Marian 422 Madison Ave Crystal MN 55429 -3128 5800 Saint Croix Ave N #W415 Hopkins MN 55343 (763) 533 -9592 Golden Valley MN 55422 -4782 (952) 931 -9081 53 r /11-1. I'LL J3 D / 99 Hunczak, Shirley 14410 Fairway Drive Eden Prairie MN 55344 -1955 (952) 934 -9053 Hunnewell, Willard Jr and Kim; Richard, Topher, J.W., William 4800 Golf Terrace Edina MN 55424 -1515 (952) 920 -6463 Hunter, Kurt and Kathy 5918 W 39th St St Louis Park MN 55416 Hunter, Mark and Liz; Casey, John, James 4134 Yosemite Avenue South St Louis Park MN 55416 -3123 (612) 239 -0451 Hunter, Perry and Anne; Lindsay 4529 Bruce Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1122 (952) 922 -7518 Hunzelman, Nick and Renee; Jack, Mitch 7461 West Shore Drive Edina MN 55435 -4064 (952) 929 -8393 Hurda, Rob and Kelly; Aubrey 5146 Humboldt Avenue North Brooklyn Center MN 55430 -3427 (612) 588 -0072 Huss, Joe and Sarah; TJ, Belae 4929 Thomas Ave. S Minneapolis MN 55410 (612) 915 -1154 Hutchison, Kristen 153 Oakwood Road Hopkins MN 55343 -8530 (952) 933 -1480 Hylok, Earl and Melanie; Evan, Eric 6004 Saxony Road Edina MN 55436 -1238 (952) 928 -8395 I Ingwalson, Chuck and Mara 7408 Cahill Road Edina MN 55439 -2724 (952) 922 -8652 J Jacobs, Bill and Jane 490+ BrowndaleAvenue Edina h9N 55424.1145 (952) 922 -7362 Jacobs.Jean 5409 Ashcroft Place Minnetonka NIN 553-15 -404iO (952) 934 -5638 Jahn, Marlene 4545 Valley View Road #31- Edina MN 55424 -1839 (952) 928 -4874 James, Annika; Annika 2103 Pleasant Ave S #4 Minneapolis MN 55404 Jamieson, Tom and Dorothy 30 Sandy Hook Road Chanhassen MN 55317 -9312 (952) 937 -8658 Jamison, Rhonda 2648 Salem Avenue South St. Louis Park MN 55416 -1914 Jeffers, Warren and Barb; Kendra, Dara, Aubree 8428 Virginia Road Minneapolis MN 55438 -1376 (952) 944 -7964 Jensen, Bud and Jinny 5207 West 92nd Street Circle Bloomington MN 55437 -1824 (952) 831 -3458 Jensen, Craig and Peggy 15625 40th Avenue North Plymouth MN 55446 -2631 (763) 208 -9507 Jensen, Jeff and Jennifer; Tess, Henry, Leo, Irene 4721 Upper Terrace Edina MN 55435 -1551 (612) 272-2327 (Jeff) (612) 272 -2285 (Jennifer) Jensen, Patricia 15601 Lilac Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 Jensen, Tom and Christine; Chris, Heidi 15810 Nursery Drive Minnetonka MN 55345 -4552 (952) 937 -5138 55 Jobst, Todd and Michelle 9898 Dell Road Eden Prairie MN 55347 -3522 Johnson, Cindy; Kate, Jack, Emily Ford 5313 Whiting Ave Edina MN 55439 (952) 941 -6955 Johnson, Cliff 12820 Laurie Lane Chaska MN 55318 -9271 (952) 466 -2288 Johnson, Frank and Peggy 4701 White Oaks Road Edina MN 55424 -1240 (952) 920 -2891 Johnson, Gary L. 5925 Ewing Avenue South Edina MN 55410 Johnson, Gary; Tyler, Maggie 13585 Zenith Lane Eden Prairie MN 55346 -3271 (952) 933 -6539 Johnson, Gene 5215 Park Avenue Minneapolis MN 55417 (612) 824 -5389 Johnson, George and Joan 6261 Sequoia Circle Eden Prairie MN 55346 -1426 (952) 906 -0077 Johnson, Jonathan and Laurie 17170 Rogers Road Eden Prairie MN 55347 -3367 (952) 595 -8933 Johnson,Judy 11430 Louisiana Avenue South Bloomington MN 55438 -2825 (952) 944 -6825 Johnson, Keith and Sherry 6035 Clarion Pass Minnetonka MN 55343 (952) 380 -3632 Johnson, Keith and Thelma 5598 Bimini Drive Minnetonka MN 55343 -9432 (612) 384 4455 Johnson, Kirk and Lisa; Alex, Artem, Aliya 5844 St. John's Avenue Edina MN 55424 (952) 922 -3344 1S I -1 02 do King, Alan and Sunhee (( Klein, Helen Kowalczyk, Bob 3409 West Park Drive F Friendship Village 10113 West 34th Street #218 Burnsville MN 55306 -6984 8104 Highwood Dr #G136 Minnetonka MN 55305 -4552 Bloomington MN 55438 -3037 King, Roberta Krafft, Jo 4732 Lyndale Avenue South Klein, John I: 6566 France Avenue South #304 Minneapolis MN 55409 -5304 1100 VVoi diaine Lane Edina MN 55435 -1710 (612) 827 -6160 Brooklyn Center M145)5430=1113 (952) 929 -2564 (763)561 -2341 Kipfer, Carson and Amanda Krafft, Phil and Mary; 3934 Aldrich Avenue South Klingsporn, Gary and Debra; I Josh Bettes, Hannah Krafft, Noah Krafft Minneapolis MN 55409 -1414 Katy, Kari 7313 Wooddale Avenue South (715) 379 -8581 64 Cenlre street Edina MN 55435 -4157 Nantuckel. M =A 02554 (952) 928 -0532 I Kirchner, Mitchell and Sheila Johnson; ;952) 200 -6458 Dominique Kirchner Kramer, Timothy 8090 Eden Road #138 Knight, Richard and Sandy P.O. Box 582853 Eden Prairie MN 55344 10117 Harrison Road Minneapolis MN 55458 -2853 (952) 942 -5898 Bloomington MN 55437 -2418 I (952) 831 -5397 Kreger, Elwyn and Kay Klrscht, Rob and Courtney; $619 Bich Road Addle, Kelsey Knudson, Earl Jr Bloomington 1`414 55437 -1366 4813 Aspasia Lane 1316 South Broadway (952) 835 <2843 Edina MN 55435 -4066 New Ulm MN 56073 (952) 926 -1146 Kuripers, Dave and So,rah; Kopperud, Erik Claire, Grace Kittelson, Autash; 11845 Harvest Lane # 24 Tyr 1 Kirn!)c,oy Lana Preston, Athan Eden Prairie MN 55347 Eden Maine MN 6629 Cornelia Drive (612) 309 - 6370 (952) 294 -4397 Edina MN 55435 -1654 (952) 201 -4901 Korkkl, Chris and Stacey; Kulp, Kay Claire 3330 Walnut Grove Lane Kittelson, Carol 16462 Dodd Lane Plymouth MN 55447 -1026 6629 Cornelia Drive Lakeville MN 55044 (763) 475 -1983 Edina MN 55435 -1654 (612) 532 -7388 (952) 905 -1288 Kuske. Susan Korsbon, Jesse and Jennie; +G2? Ver;ilior Kizershot, Don and Nancy Grace, Isabelle Eagan fa^: 55122 ,1010 5529 Mirror Lakes Drive #; 5920 Grass Lake Terrace (651) 456 -0979 Edina MN 55436 -2036 Minneapolis MN 55419 -2139 (952) 920 -9726 (612) 861 -4364 Kuyath, Disk and Laurie. Brad, Matt Kizilos, Tolly and Betty Korthof, Dean 6103 Jeffrey Lane 2841 Mayfield Road 6518 Wilryan Avenue Edina rvIN 5 ,5436 -1?06 Wayzata MN 55391 -2509 Edina MN 55439 -1455 (952) 938 -1471 (952) 935 -0179 (952) 941 -5121 Kvistad, Gayle and Annie Darting Kjer, Paul and Annette; Koski, Paul 3618 West 44th Street Joshua ' 16526 West 78th Street PMB182 Minneapolis MN 55410 -1366 8315 Colfax Avenue South Eden Prairie MN 55346 (612) 926 -8349 Bloomington MN 55420 -2109 (952) 884 -3945 Kosmas, Greg and Debra; Charlie, Nina Klaseus, James and Diane 6617 Naomi Drive 9936 Nesbitt Circle Edina MN 55439 -1428 Laitala, ,Jerry acid Bloomington MN 55437 -2263 (952) 944 -6500 Christopher. I?r,c;lr >I (952) 835 -2468 6220, t ra+ !::urr Cirrl Kosmas, John and Mary Ann Edina MN 55439 -2548 Klassy, Don aFid Mary Lou 4849 Upton Avenue South 1952) 9=14 -3625 5353 Ashcroft Road Minneapolis MN 55410 -1807 Minnetonka MN 55345 -4007 (612) 922 -4849 Laitala, Russell (952) 474 -3813 1 230 East 107th Street Circle Minneapolis MN 55420 -5315 (952) 884 -2442 57 4 Lewis, Ryan and Kristin; Lonergan, Michael and Jayne; Lunden, Duke III and Jeanne; Caden, Greyson Michelle Kalli, Tad 3741 Inglewood Avenue South 5812 Olinger Boulevard 3901 Auburn Drive St. Louis Park MN 55416 -4921 Edina MN 55436 -1914 Minnetonka MN 55305 -5196 (952) 928 -0237 (952) 938 -8110 Lickteig, Chris 6836 Langford Drive Edina MN 55436 -1746 (952) 933 -3977 Lief, Ed Butler Quarter Station P.O. Box 3300 Minneapolis MN 55403 -0300 Lierboe, Lee and Evelyn 8505 Flying Cloud Drive #124 Eden Prairie MN 55344.3947 (952) 995 -1049 Lima, David and Susan; Michael 9481 Painters Ridge Eden Prairie MN 55347 -2832 (952) 944 -2962 Lindemann, Chuck and Shirley Friendship Village 8104 Highwood Drive G219 Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 830 -9713 Lindsay, Jeff and Tami; Michael, Nicole 12762 Emmer Place Apple Valley MN 55124 -6241 (952) 322 -4787 Lindsey, Jim and Jill 5501 Dewey Hill Road #123 Edina MN 55439 -1907 (952) 921 -0923 Lins, Todd and Michelle; Serena 9511 Bennett Place Eden Prairie MN 55347 (952) 944 -0143 Lockwood, Ed and Nancy 17703 Landmark Court Lakeville MN 55044 -5229 Lohman, Bill 10264 Berkshire Road Bloomington MN 55437 -2265 (952) 831 -1167 Lohmann, Kim 2100 Ridge Drive #32 Saint Louis Park MN 55416 75613 (952) 593 -1419 Looby, Kevin and Susan 1262 N Landmark Trail Hopkins MN 55343 Loper, Stewart and Nancy; - Tom 9506 Woodridge Circle Eden Prairie MN 55347 -2743 (952) 941 -5211 Lounsberry, Ed and Berrie 10228 Berkshire Road Bloomington MN 55437 (952) 929 -6785 Lovestrand, Joyce 10237 Berkshire Road Bloomington MN 55437 -2264 (952) 830 -0015 Lowe, Fiona 9206 Portland Bloomington MN 55420 (612) 349 -8649 Lowman, Dwayne 8400 5th Avenue South Bloomington MN 55420 -2332 Lowman, Pat 8400 5th Avenue South Bloomington MN 55420 -2332 (952) 884 -1422 Lowry, Aaron and Sarah; Emily, Jacob 1009 Chestnut St Belle Plaine MN 56011 Lucktenberg, Paul and Celeste; Jonathon, Lindsay 5176 Abercrombie Drive Edina MN 55439 -1462 (952) 918 -9092 Ludcke, Jeannette 6085 Lincoln Drive #316 Edina MN 55436 -1635 (952) 938 -2341 Lund, 'Fom Sr and Darlene 6333.Vinceni Avenue South Richfield MN 55x23 -1025 (612) 861-5519 59 Lusian, Lisa 21651 Linden Way Rogers MN 55374 (763) 242 -4309 Lussky, Rich and Sue; Michelle, Kevin 6529 Navaho Trail Edina MN 55439 -1137 (952) 941 -5024 Lychd, 9365toolle1 and sn a; Gsorgci, Greta 7129 ShavuLc -n Olive N'iinneapolis LAIN [5-S -139 (952) 920 -0907 Lyddon, *.iesu 510 J4 2301h Sfz 21 1*404111 5;carvdi:a 55073-95.19 1651)433 -3328 Lyke, Susan 4521 Laguna Drive Edina MN 55435 -1624 IM Maakestad, Jon and Bev Turbin; Ben, Maria 6521 Navaho Trail Edina MN 55439 -1137 (952) 914 -0188 MacArthur, Audrey 5440 Vernon Ave #243 Edina MN 55436 MacLennan, Elizabeth 10996 Quebec Avenue South Bloomington MN 55438 -2602 (952) 944 -0571 MacLennan, Ev and Mary Ann 4510 Edina Boulevard Edina MN 55424 -1134 (952) 927 -9389 MacPhail, Stu 8168 Parkview Lane Bloomington MN 55438 -1096 (952) 830 -9841 _ Madden, Brian and Stephanie; Ian, Kaitilyn, Andrea 1823 Quail Drive Shakopee MN 55379 -4350 (952) 496 -2035 " LUM I %V a oy L McNamara, Pat Merrill, William and Ella Ramsey Miller, Casey and Nancy; 5601 Dewey Hill Road #206 4335 Sussex Road Austin, Jack Edina MN 55439 -1924 Golden Valley MN 55416 -3556 7040 Kellogg Avenue (952) 944 -0061 (763) 374 -9513 Edina MN 55435 -4141 Meline, Marcella (612) 973.1971 (952)928 -0482 McPheeters, Ben and Carol Merriman, Stephen and Margaret; Mitchell, Rir:;F and Caro! 5525 Hansen Road #211 Kathryn Miller, Clay and Lisa; Edina MN 55436 -2325 1811 Rhode Island Avenue North Samantha, Sonya (952) 926 -1367 Golden Valley MN 55427 -4070 4600 Sunnyside Road Meline, Marilyn (763) 544 -3311 Edina MN 55424 -1104 McVee, Bonnie and Jack Earles (952) 920 -4955 418 Harrison Ave S Merryman, Roberta and Dwight 7(.11 %Ja s: ? Grand b<<.y 424 Hopkins MN 55343 7909 Victoria Curve Miller, Joan St Louis Park MN 55426 -6069 Friendship Village Meerdlnk, Leona 8100 Highwood Drive #G 111 6116 Caklawn Avenue Metcalfe, Joan Bloomington MN 55438 -1006 Edina MN 55424 -1924 304 Brooksby Village Drive #315 (952) 830 -9888 (952) 927 -4843 Peabody MA 01960 -8584 1952) 944 -1547 (978) 535 -7365 Miller, Kay; Meier, D.G. (952) 926 -3430 Cory 517 West River Parkway Meyer, Chuck and Carolyn 4101 Morningside Road Champlin MN 55316 -1226 6928 Valley View Road Edina MN 55416 (612) 750 -7731 Edina MN 55439 -1648 (952) 927 -7716 (952) 941 -8769 Meier, Tom and Marcia; (952) 448 -7903 Miller, Larry and Paula Meserve Marcus, Milo Meyer, Helen and Bill Bieber 8697 Sycamore Lane 9751 Mill Creek Drive 6504 Stauder Circle Maple Grove MN 55369 Eden Prairie MN 55347 -4307 Edina MN 55436 (763) 420 -6955 (952) 828 -0854 (952) 473 -6341 (763) 377 -5506 Mindiola,John and Tracy; Meland, Greg and Linda Rich Meland Michel, Joe and Joy Christian 2801 Cavell Avenue South 8900 Elliot Avenue 9800 69th Ave N #112 St. Louis Park MN 55426 -2911 Bloomington MN 55420 -3028 Maple Grove MN 55369 (952) 935 -7901 (952) 854 -7846 (763) 432 -2990 Melin, Kathleen Michielutti, Peter: thing, Sharon 603 Lake Street Apt# 207 Kris Ncmje ;n, Kato: Noidr-en 1103 Cove.ntr-v PIa;;:: Excelsior MN 55331 1081 Sun; ysiae. F;oad Edir.;.i ? ;1N Erhnr (v1N 5.`= =24 -1245 (952) 922 -7967 Meline, Marcella (612) 973.1971 10101 Lyndale Avenue S #205 Mitchell, Rir:;F and Caro! Bloomington MN 55420 -4231 Mickelson, Dick 306 Pc.!raard PL (952) 885 -9676 111 Union Terrace 1 ane 1,Mr1h 13,(00rninot0r; IMN YA20 Plvmoul;-, IMIN 55,141 -6237 (952) 8884463 Meline, Marilyn (763) 545 -1181 32951 Highway 56 Modell. Je nn Stanton MN 55018 -7253 >,� Micklo, ,e•.in and Katie 7(.11 %Ja s: ? Grand b<<.y 424 (507) 263 -4252 :; 5 Alyshea Court St Louis Poi* 1< N 5.5x416 Shakopee MN 55379 Melius, Verna Moe, fin; Jan 9591 Falcons Way Miles, Darren and Danielle.:: 6519 C ;'-eek Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 Ernine. Jack. Harr, Edina MN 55+3ri t ?07 (952) 944 -5669 •10210 Inr.�l- wi,c;d Ave. S. 1952) 944 -1547 Edna MN 55,11r, Melrose, Vel (952) 926 -3430 Moeller, Ali 4704 Aspasia Circle 312 Ktmriiar Circle Edina MN 55435 -4065 Millard, Sarah Hopkins ?will 55315 -10163 (952) 925 -4999 50 Craaapple. Lane (952) 545 -8452 Chaska IAN 553,31 Mende, Kathleen (952) 448 -7903 Moen, Ross and Elaine Sloan; 8600 Russell Avenue South Alex Bloomington MN 55431 -1938 4325 Douglas Avenue (952) 887 -4112 Golden Valley MN 55416 -3522 (763) 377 -5506 61 3 (LO6 Nelson, Mary; Norris, John and Anna; O'Neill, George and Robin; Adam, Chris John, Anna # Adam, David, Amy 5213 Tifton Drive 6216 Wyman Avenue 1 8291 Drexel Court Edina MN 55439 -1458 Edina MN 55436 -2611 Eden Prairie MN 55347 -2152 (952) 941 -1485 (952) 926 -8356 (952) 934 -5378 Nelson, Nancy; Beth, Dan 18088 Cattail Court Eden Prairie MN 55346 -2160 Nelson, Susan; Erik 215 10th Ave S Unit 420 Minneapolis MN 55415 (612) 333 -3962 Newell, Jamie and Teresa 6316 Peacedale Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1928 (952) 926 -2373 Nicely, Scott and Krista 1772 Rye Court Shakopee MN 55379 (952) 403 -0237 Nieland, Todd and Barbara 5500 Mirror Lakes Edina MN 55436 -2037 (952) 925 -0313 Nilsson, Harry 9406 Minnetonka Boulevard St Louis Park MN 55426 -2943 (952) 938 -2680 Nooleen, Andrew and Kim; Tristan, Sienna 6809 4th Avenue South Richfield MN 55423 -2425 (612) 281 -3356 Norback, Howard and Florence Friendship Village 8104 Highwood Drive #G137 Bloomington MN 55438 -3037 (952) 830 -9674 Nordling, Sally 8301 Creekside Circle #910 Bloomington MN 55437 -3856 (952) 831 -1212 Norman, Dan and Kimberly; Colin 4805 Ewing Avenue South Edina MN 55410 -1749 Norris, Jeff and-Denise; Andrea, Steph, Kyle 10519 Xylon Road South Bloomington MN 55438 -1922 (952) 829 -0762 Nyquist, Rich; Claire 5357 Ewing Ave. S Minneapolis MN 55410 Nyvall, Mark and Linda; Peter, Kate 1439 Alpine Pass Minneapolis MN 55416 -3560 (763) 377 -4534 Cc O'Connor, Katie 2799 Rustic Place #109 Little Canada MN 55117 O'Dell, Paul 201 Mill Street #101 Excelsior MN 55331 -4527 (952) 934 -6526 O'Keefe, Bridget 8113 Virginia Circle North St Louis Park MN 55426 Olan, Christian 4320 Highway 7 Apt. 1 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (925) 759 -6862 Olan, Steve 4320 Highway 7 Apt. 2 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (925) 759 -6860 Q1sen, :aF'iir't�v (952) 920 -0533 Olson, Ken and Lynnette 7738 Lochmere Terrace Edina MN 55439 -2618 (952) 944 -1622 Olson, Sue 45.19 Grand Avenue Soioh N-Sinneapolis hdlJ 55?11<i - <sye (612) 823 -4621 Omar, llustafa and Jeri 6226 Whispering Caks fir' - Eden Prairi>+ hltJ 55346 (952) 452-6074 63 Orbison, John; Ann, Tom 4916 Poppy Lane Edina MN 55435 -4012 (952) 920 -7870 Orchard, Ann and Bob Keller 6500 Parnell Avenue Edina MN 55435 -1515 (952) 929 -6774 Otto, Jim and Beth 6817 Dakota Trail Edina MN 55439 -1120 (952) 941 -4003 N Packard, Mavis Friendship Village 8102 Highwood Drive #B236 Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 830 -9482 Page, Colleen 3748 West Calhoun Pkwy Edina MN 55410 Paine, Lewis and Marcia 9055 Preserve Blvd Eden Prairie MN 55347 Paladugu, Madhavi j 12815 30th Avenue North Plymouth MN 55441 Palm, Ace 8505 Flying Cloud Drive #218 Eden Prairie MN 55344 -3955 (952) 995 -1088 Palmehn, Bob and Kathy 5905 Halifax Avenue South Edina MN 55424 -1942 (952) 920 -8011 Palmehn, Tom and Cynthia 6929 Morgan Avenue South Richfield MN 55423 -2115 (612) 866 -4662 Palmlter, Joseph and Charlotte 977 Bluff Pass South Chaska MN 55318 -9713 (952) 556 -5215 Z� 2 • a2 og Poppler, Jack and Cathy 13413 Foxberry Rd Savage MN 55378 (952) 445 -3576 Porthan, Todd and Cathy; Olivia, Taylor 7301 Wooddale Ave. S Edina MN 55435 (952) 926 -3031 Portu, Octavio and Jody; Jeff, Michael 4705 Annaway Drive Edina MN 55436 -1303 (952) 939 -0018 Potter, Jerry and Nancy 5025 West 60th Street Edina MN 55436 -2614 (952) 836 -4988 Powell, Christine 9318 Columbus Ave S Bloomington MN 55420 Prahl, Aaron and Willa 7201 York Ave S #1203 Edina MN 55435 Prescott, Chris and Cyri; Max, Margo 6516 Warren Avenue Edina MN 55439 -1247 (952) 944 -2415 Presser, Pamela 5615 12th Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55417 -2520 (612) 824 -6876 Preusse, Erika 1100 Bliss Lane Bloomington MN 55431 -4113 Priadka, Stephanie 2628 Huntington Ave S St Louis Park MN 55416 (952) 920 -0903 Price, Randy 4158 Rahn Road #21 Eagan MN 55122 Pryor, Doris Friendship Village 8104 Highwood Drive G311 Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 830 -9809 Puett, Jason and Elie; Spencer, Annabelle, Grady 11770 Riverview Road Eden Prairie MN 55347 -4911 (952) 941 -8322 Putnina. Santa ar i Kaspars K.alnitis Vanesa Putnina 3.455 Tyler Street N.E. Minneapolis MN 554 1 8 -1 354 (612) 789 -3377 Quinby, Chris and Kristin: Brooks. Jack 4010 Monterey Ave Ldi lid 100 55416 (952) 920 -9420 IS Raab, Dave and Peggy :)'55 De:'. %::y Hili' Roa_i 1,"I i Eitina MN 515439- 19ii "r' (952) 918 -9066 Radcliffe. h:1 :n i 6408 Red Fox E:,t:na f-vIN 55436-1,922 (952) 925 -1502 Radtke, Stephen and Kathy 10781 Hopkins Circle Bloomington MN 55420 -5518 (952) 881 -3977 Ragatz, Dick and Jill 1945 Concordia Street Wayzata MN 55391 -9320 (952) 471 -9056 Ram, Brenda 5616 Heather Lane Edina MN 55436 -1205 (952) 929 -7414 Rammy, 10ichae+ and Daisy +829 c..in: A'A, S FdIna P•aN >5.110 (952) 941 -2440 Ramsey, Ella and William Merrill 4335 Sussex Road Golden Valley MN 55416 -3556 (763) 374 -9513 Ramseyer, Paul and Grace 3820 Haven Road Minnetonka MN 55345 -2369 (952) 936 -9860 Ramsland, Jim and Jane 5605 Schaefer Road - Edina MN 55436 -1112 (952) 938 -9530 65 Randall, Ron and Carole Lee 5565 West 70th Street Edina MN 55439 -1901 (952) 943 -1135 Rebers, Laurie and Steven Fountain 134 11th Ave S #305 Hopkins MN 55343 -1602 :(952)933 -3786 Recker, Rick and Karrie; Melinda 4000 W 42nd Street Edina MN 55416 Reding, David and Courtney; Alexandra 5629 Wycliffe Road Edina MN 55436 -2262 Reilly, Marilyn and Tom Smullen Jr. 6600 Londonderry Drive Edina MN 55436 -1721 (952) 933 -3873 Reiners, Michelle 1481 Woodhill Road Burnsville MN 55337 (612) 875 -1403 Reissner, Jim and Jean t 5852 Long Brake Trail Edina MN 55439 -2622 (952) 941 -6128 Reif, Helen 11333 Fairfield Road #215 Minnetonka MN 55305 -1407 (952) 545 -6387 Reynolds, Matthew and Amber 3637 Gettysburg Avenue New Hope MN 55427 (763) 546 -1097 Richards, Thomas 4860 Woodland Avenue Shakopee MN 55379 Richardson, Chris 9247 West 126th Street Savage MN 55378 -1184 (612) 616 -8004 Richardson, Sean 1425 LaSalle Ave #409 Minneapolis MN 55403 (612) 309 -9893 Richardson, Steve and Linda; Kaylin 7068 Cahill Road Edina MN 55439 -2035 (952) 922 -8999 � io S Schaefer, Mark and Nancy; Hannah, Tom, Carl 6525 Nordic Drive Saari, David and Laurie; Minneapolis MN 55439 -1141 Alli (952) 829 -0760 21035 Oak Lane Greenwood MN 55331 -8620 Schaefer, Tim and Katie; (952) 937 -5210 Jack, Liney 6436 Tingdale Ave Salovich, Elmer Edina MN 55439 12 Overholt Pass (952) 303 -4188 Edina MN 55439 -1146 (952) 942 -8041 Schaub, Janette and Kenneth Ritterspach Sanders, Catherine; 9571 Oxborough Curve Alex Hutton Minneapolis MN 55437 -3705 5608 Pennsylvania Avenue North Crystal MN 55428 -3326 Scheele, Sally and John Walters (763) 533 -1591 7200 York Avenue South #509 Edina MN 55435 -4406 Sanders, Jakob and Kimberly; (952) 835 -3193 Gigi, Sophia 4709 Aspasia Circle Scheu, Toobie Edina MN 55435 16076 Creekwood Road (952) 926 -1537 Prior Lake MN 55372 -2263 Sanders, Maxine Schlegel, Kaylan Friendship Village 2724 Dakota Ave S 8104 Highwood Drive G138 St Louis Park MN 55416 Bloomington MN 55438 -1083 (612) 408 -9669 (952) 830 -9665 Schmalenberger, Tamra Sankey, Moreau 215 10th Ave S #311 6307 Doron Lane Minneapolis MN 55415 Edina MN 55439 (651) 207 -1107 Saracoff, Juanita Schmidt, David and Mary; 11750 Tulip Street NW Lauren, Jessica Coon Rapids MN 55433 8809 Westmoreland Lane St Louis Park MN 55426 -1936 Saterbak, Mel and Kathy (952) 930 -9822 4505 Oxford Avenue Edina MN 55436 -1405 Schmoker, Dick and Kit (952) 929 -1287 6616 Biscayne Boulevard Edina MN 55436 -1704 Sawyer, Tim and Heidi; (952) 933 -6590 Erika, Emily 2809 29th Avenue N.E. Schneider, Dean and Shirley St. Anthony MN 55418 -2409 2520 Dresden Lane (612) 788 -4148 Golden Valley MN 55422 -3616 (763) 588 -1959 Schab, Betsy 5210 Villa Way #353 Schoenecker, Jenni Edina MN 55436 -2150 547 Kendall Dr (952) 920 -6049 Hastings MN 55033 (952) 239 -9291 Schaefer, Dianne 5605 Melody Lake Drive Scholen, Jonah and Anne; Edina MN 55436 -2418 Hannah (952) 848 -7520 4934 39th Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55417 -1666 (612) 722 -4571 67 Schroeckensteln, David 8210 Norman Creek Trail Bloomington MN 55437 -3814 Schroeder, Tim and Becky; Madeline, Jacqueline, Skye 5305 Knox Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55419 -1043 (612) 605 -0712 Schulz, Ron and Joan 6308 Peacedale Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1928 (952) 920 -7473 Schwartz, J.A. and Joyce; Ridley, Pearson 6514 Gray Fox Curve Chanhassen MN 55317 -9244 (952) 974 -0539 Schwarzkopf, Lil Friendship Village 8100 Highwood Drive Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 830 -9767 Scott, Acher 6005 Tracy Avenue Edina MN 55436 Scott, Jeff and Mary 13223 Spencer Sweet Pea Lane Eden Prairie MN 55347 -2181 (952) 944 -5582 Scudder, Glenn and Donna 4528 Oxford Avenue Edina MN 55436 -1406 (952) 920 -5015 Sebek, Gary and Julie; Emma, Liam 4628 33rd Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55406 -3829 (612) 728 -1931 Sedoff,Jeanne 4601 Concord Terrace Edina MN 55424 -1544 (952) 927 -5860 Seidel, Glen and Peggy 400 Kirkwood Lane N Plymouth MN 55441 (763) 546 -1650 Sellars, Steven and Margaret 6805 Forestview Lane No. . Maple Grove MN 55369 -5504 Seminars, Paul and Wendi 10046 Indigo Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 -1206 (952) 934 -6169 02/2 Smullen, Tom Jr. and Marilyn Reilly Stageberg, Roger and Sheila Stewart, Floyd and Mary Lou 6600 Londonderry Drive 223 Bank Street S.E. 12500 Lake Street Extension Edina MN 55436 -1721 Minneapolis MN 55414 -1039 Minnetonka MN 55305 -5181 (952) 933 -3873 (612) 378 -3001 (952) 933 -1168 Snell, Greg and Deb Stahl, Bobbi _ Stidger, Raymond and Nancy PO Box 411 9929 Bluff Road 7340 Cornelia Drive Naivasha, Kenya 20117 Eden Prairie MN 55347 Edina MN 55435 -4162 (250) 086 -5054 (952) 835 -7311 Stalley, Rod and Sally Snell, Mike and Jennifer 10635 James Circle South Stiles. vdiliiar r .rttt F. =ran 412 John St Bloomington MN 55431 -4157 66104 Hillside t.ane Hopkins MN 55343 (952) 888 -5961 Edina MN' (952) 835 -8948 (952) 941 -3284 Stalley, Tim; Soblenlak, Steve and Vicki Christopher, Lucas Stockdale, Dorothy 3399 Crystal Bay Road 10635 James Circle South Friendship ': <illage Wayzata MN 55391 Bloomington MN 55431 -4157 8106 Highwood Drive 41 Y-;;S (952) 888 -5961 tiio::lmington 1:4NV 554:318 Soderberg, Libby and Andy Chollar; (952) 830 -9753 Sam, Sarah Stanek, Stan and Sue; 3826 Haven Road Caroline, Kay Jo Stone. Ben and C:ir iy: Minnetonka MN 55345 -2369 8117 West 96th Street Gordan, (952) 933 -7763 Bloomington MN 55438 - 1578 6906 Paiute Circle (952) 941 -5920 Edina MN 554339 103 i Soderstrom, Ric (952) 946 -0822 9148 West Bush Lake Road Stankovitch. Pod Bloomington MN 55438 -1437 1 1' C!Pence! Swot i Pea L. ar: Stone. Cu'viti Eden Prairie l4N -55347-2181 5220 interlachen Boulevard Solovy, Michael and Erin Egesdal (952) 944 -2887 Edina FAhJ 55436 1 `t !' 13560 TechnologyDr #1319 (952) 836 -1317 Eden Prairie MN 55344 Stark. le_! III and ^•1114,. (952) 250 - 1185 ?'ni'. taa;is , A.IIi Stover. Sob -'.,v %d So 46:. '. lovales cAlde 6000 `he,, Lan-- Somwaru, Della F iin;3 P.1hJ 55x7;1.7 23: Edina Al P-4 554.36 -1827 9110 Medley Circle (952) 922.7503 (952) 920 -7278 Golden Valley MN 55427 -3159 Stark. Tf d Jr and Pa1 Strang, Bit; ar;d L,-" Sorensen, Alice 46.12 F::ar --� Avenue SuuW 113 Woudlnnd Road 3633 Park Center Boulevard #128 Effin;a I•.1NJ 55110 -1 S3 Edina f, —J :,5414 -1631 St Louis Park MN 55416 -2534 (952) 922 -8042 (952) 925-3807 (952) 915 -9704 Steiner. i- '.���.�ck and S.,r••- -1v Slritub. Robert :1nd J,.;r;itt' Sorensen, Mark and Rebecca; [:: io i T ienlon Lane 622.1 Idvlwood Lww- Annabell, Luke Plvrri;rn a MN 55.142. -324, rd!na ON 4304 Eton Place (612) 889 -7180 (952) 931 -9596 Edina MN 55424 (952) 920 -0928 Steinke, Lance and Michelle; Strickland, Steven Jame, Joshua 10110 40th Avenue North Sorensen, Natalie 4825 Rutledge Avenue I Plymouth MN 55441 8586 134th Street West Edina MN 55436 -1420 (763) 545 -7751 Apple Valley MN 55124 (952) 922 -3944 Stuart, Celeste; Spear, Sharon Stenseth, Linda Emily 5405 Rowland Park Road 7250 York Ave S #321 4431 Garrison Lane Minnetonka MN 55343 -4358 Edina MN 55435 Edina MN 55424 -1846 (952) 938 -3902 (952) 942 -5233 (952) 926 -0421 Spindler, Jessica; Riley 6412 Josephine Ave. S Edina MN 55439 Stern, Thomas and Joan 5808 Kellogg Avenue Minneapolis MN 55424 -1818 (952) 926 -4159 69 Stuart, David and Gayl Gustafson; Vika 4431 Garrison Lane Edina MN 55424 -1846 (952) 926 -0421 C any Thorpe, Charlie Jr Turbin, Bev and Jon Maakestad; Van Bergen, Peter and Linda; 1439 Cedar Lake Pkwy Ben, Maria Kate Minneapolis MN 55416 -3602 6521 Navaho Trail 1610 Hill Ridge Terrace Edina MN $5439 -1137 Minnetonka MN 55305 -1718 544 Tjeerdsma, Craig and Crystal; ; (952) 914 -0188 (952) -7354 Carson, Oscar 6545 Tanager Lane Turner, John and Leslie Van Heel, Jean; Eden Prairie MN 55346 -1813 301 Kenwood Parkway #502 Cary, Alison Minneapolis MN 55403 -1165 3507 Elmwood Place Tomczyk, Lisa (612) 920 -4629 Minnetonka MN 55345 137 9th Avenue North (952) 473 -0679 Hopkins MN 55343 -7316 Tweet, David and Janice (952) 303 -5068 13180 Cardinal Creek Road VandenHoek, Paul and Katie; Eden Prairie MN 55346 -1940 Jordan Tomoson, Ross and Tammy (952) 937 -5190 7319 Derby Lane 5908 Grove Street Shakopee MN 55379 -7061 Edina MN 55436 -2259 Tycast, Steve and Nora (952) 233 -8006 232 Kentucky Ave N Tomoson, Ross; New Hope MN 55427 Vassar, Dan and Stephany Matt 145 17th Ave N 5908 Grove Street Tysver, Aleda; j Hopkins MN 55343 Edina MN 55436 -2259 Tim Mertz I (952) 926 -7228 1004 Heldt Street Vaughn, Cully and Sue; Chaska MN 55318 -2255 Paige Conner Torkelson, Jim (952) 448 -9789 5829 Halifax Avenue 4401 Poplar Bridge Road Edina MN 55424 -1947 Bloomington MN 55437 -1428 T T (952) 285 -6884 (952) 835 -6504 �J Velde, Joan Tracy, Jean Ueland, Sigurd Jr and Sissy 7200 Cahill Road #202 7652 Woodview Court 3430 List Place #1801 Edina MN 55439 -2066 Edina MN 55439 -1768 Minneapolis MN 55416 (952) 944 -8448 (612) 926 -8638 Treberg, Steven Venaglia, Robert and Katherine 321 8th Ave N Ullom, Caroline and Joe Carroll 6406 McCauley Circle Hopkins MN 55343 5945 Walnut Drive Edina MN 55439 -1020 (952) 930 -0751 F r1ii:2 1014 55436 (952) 942 -0659 1612) 245 -5781 Trftle, Gina Vessey, Jim and Carole 4609 West 90th Street Ullom, Steve and Christine; 9945 Nord Road Bloomington MN 55437 Allison Bloomington MN 55437 -2341 (952) 831 -1872 5229 Richwood Drive (952) 831 -8231 Edina MN 55436 -2321 Tsakistos, Michael and Jeanette (952) 926 -6493 Vessey, Patricia 4716 Dunberry Lane 7917 South Bay Curve Edina MN 55435 -1535 Urban, Jeff and Susan; Eden Prairie MN 55347 (952) 920 -6610 Sydney (952) 974 -5089 2653 Xenwood Avenue South Tschida, Gerald and Jane St Louis Park MN 55416 -1726 Vickman, Thomas and Karen 8931 Maple Shores Drive (952) 926 -9133 8574 Franlo Road Pine City MN 55063 -4710 Eden Prairie MN 55344 -3952 Utz, Gina: (952) 941 -8576 Tucker, Andy and Jolene; Laila Kreulzberger Ben, Brooke, John 5625 Boone Avenue #129 Villas, Joyce 6632 Southcrest Drive Nevi Hope ION 55 128 -5407 i 5416 Creek View Lane Edina MN 55435 -1548 J Minneapolis MN 55439 (952) 924 -0312 Y l (952) 941 -4930 Tucker, Howie and Judy Vinson, Cheryl and Harvey Weiss 6414 Hill A Way Court Valentine, Sally 11988 Pendleton Court Edina MN 55439 -1615 Lane. Minne Eden Prairie MN 55347 -4945 (952) 941 -0318 oohs IAN A9inr16apOliS 14iFJ X55305 (952) 941 -0724 (9:52) 913 -1380 71 2 /d Wheeler, Laverne and Babs; Randy 445 Lakota Lane #A Chaska MN 55318 -9457 (952) 496 -1759 White, Bernadette 7012 West 113th Street Bloomington MN 55438 -2446 White, Katie and Kirby Erickson 8309 West 93rd Street Bloomington MN 55438 -1403 (952) 826 -0959 White, Tom 616 Radisson Road St Louis Park MN 55416 -1160 (763) 541 -9935 Whitehead, Jesse and Leanne; Abby, Luke Flossergasse 15 8001 Zurich Switzerland (952) 232 -6555 Whitman, Stephen 13580 Technology Dr Unit 3101 Eden Prairie MN 55344 (612) 360 -3435 Whittemore, Herb and Addie 5725 Blake Road South #103 Edina MN 55436 -1152 (952) 932 -9162 Wicker, Gretchen 6104 10th Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55417 -3140 (612) 861 -2459 Wickersham, Mabeth 3700 Cedar Lake Avenue #412 St Louis Park MN 55416 -4240 Wickoren, Robert and Barbara; Parker, Drew 16401 Temple Drive South Minnetonka MN 55345 -3451 (952) 931 -9135 Widell, Gary and Jean 4525 Arden Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1116 (952) 926 -1329 Wlegand, Doug and Barbara; Kim 5328 15th Avenue South Minneapolis MN 5541 7 -1 81 2 (612) 822 -3490 Wien, Leroy and Margaret 5840 Fairfax Avenue Edina MN 55424 -1816 (952) 922 -5455 Wiggins. John 2911 Washburn Place Bloomington MN 55431 -1628 Wight. 'fob and Anne; John. Garrie 55()0 Schaeier Roai1 Edina t„ N 5j433- 1116 (952) 915 -0817 Wikman, Michael and Carrie Caroline, Charlie 5-404 Richmond Lan- [(fir( a t.:1N 55436-2437 (952) 270 -1509 Wilbur, Nancy; Karl, Mark 5100 Bedford Avenue Edina MN 55436 -2112 (952) 929 -0168 Wilkes. John and Ann cr ; 8 Ryland Creek. Road F3;:';::')!nar:'',oi) NIN ;6543: Will. j'Dh r a- .luen 6K38 Ri;J,,tevi2w Ctivs Edit a l: r� : ::543�1-1 _-35 Williams, Steve and Priscilla 4717 Aspasia Circle Edina MN 55435 (952) 922 -4009 Williams, Sue 9495 Clubhouse Road Eden Prairie MN 55347 -2935 (952) 937 -9813 Williams, Tracy and James; Addie 9739 Palmer Road Bloomington MN 55437 -2020 (612) 337 -3839 Williamson, David and Anne 7913 Wyoming Court Bloomington MN 55438 (952) 944 -3609 Wilson, John and Barbara 4117 Wayzata BLVD Golden Valley MN 55416 Wilson, Pat 10639 Utica Circle Bloomington MN 55437 -2852 (952) 842 -8366 73 Wilson, Thomas and Jenny 2321 River Pointe Lane Minneapolis MN 55411 -4282 Windhorst, Ardus Friendship Village — 8106 Highwood Drive #Y104 Bloomington MN 55438 -1098 Wise, William 2850 Autumn Woods Drive Chaska MN 55318 (952) 448 -4026 Witham, Jane 10456 Purdey Road Eden Prairie MN 53347 -5221 (952) 830 -9503 Wittenwyler, Deborah 14367 Fairway Drive Eden Prairie MN 55344 -1956 Witzel, Linda; Erik 6117 Habitat Court South Edina MN 55436 -1643 (952) 938 -5700 Wolfe, John 5524 Upton Avenue South Edina MN 55410 -2406 (612) 927 -4770 Wolfe, Tim and Holly 1016 Lavon Lane Burnsville MN 55306 -6312 Wolter, Erin 10200 Citywalk Drive #235 Woodbury MN 55129 (612) 310 -4293 Wood, Linda 7670 Woodview Court Edina MN 55439 -1768 (952) 942 -0382 Wood, Lindsay 6227 Oxford St St Louis Park MN 55416 (515) 556 -1189 Woodburn, Zach and Sarah; Charlie 324 W 84th St Bloomington MN 55420 (952) 888 -4406 Woodruff, Morley 6309 Colony Way #1 D Edina MN 55435 2 239 (952) 926 -2606 33 C 2 a o e ) • f ��R6P908 ��/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. 1.2. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Set hearing Date (8/2/2010) Cypress Equities Amendment to Final Development Plan — ACTION REQUESTED: Set the hearing date for August 2, 2010. See attached Planning Commission report, proponent materials and correspondence. w9S %�41, o� e s�2 0 • IN�q � 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 30, 2010 2010.0005.10a Director of Planning Brief Description: Amendment to the Final Development Plan at 7311 France Avenue for Cypress Equities. (The District.) Recommended Action: Recommend that the City Council approve the amendment. Introduction The applicant is requesting an amendment to the approved Final Development Plan to accomplish the following: • Revise the approved renderings of Building C (the restaurant component). The revisions include adding sliding glass panels /doors to the outdoor patio area, a new metal panel, and a fire place on the upper balcony. The stone on the fire place would match the existing stone on the building. (See page A4.) • Remove a condition from the original approval that did not allow outdoor amplication for restaurants. The intent of the request is to provide background music for customers in the outside dining areas. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages Al —A28.) In 1997, the City Council approved construction a 31,000 square foot single level retail building along France Avenue, a 22,000 square foot retail building with a 5 level parking ramp above, and a 32,960 square foot two -level retail /restaurant. Total square footage of both buildings is 86,000 square feet. (See approved plans on pages A37—A38, and the Council minutes on pages A45 —A47.) The Planning Commission recommended denial of the Final Development Plan. (See minutes on pages A40 —A44.) The restaurant building has sat vacant since its construction. A restaurant called Pinstripes would now like to occupy the space. Pinstripes would have outdoor dining on the patio and second story balcony. These uses are permitted within the MDD =6 Zoning District. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Macy's Home store; zoned and guided commercial. Easterly: Centennial Lake and condominiums; zoned for mixed use and guided multiple - family residential. Southerly: A five -story medical building; zoned for mixed use, and guided commercial. Westerly: A three -story office building; zoned and guided office. Existing Site Features The subject property is 4.2 acres in size, and contains two retail buildings totaling 86,000 square feet, and a 5 -level parking ramp. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Building Design Commercial MDD -6, Mixed Development District The changes to the building would include the addition of the sliding glass panels /doors, the metal panels and the outdoor fire place on the upper balcony. (See pages A4 —A6.) The stone on the fire place would match the existing stone on the building. Staff would consider these changes to be minor. The building would continue to meet the zoning ordinance requirement for allowed building materials. There would be no change to building height or setback. These additions to the building would be subject to building permit approval, which would include meeting all applicable building and fire code requirements. Outdoor Eating Areas Concern was raised the last time this project was reviewed, and during the pre - development, developer neighborhood meeting regarding the outdoor eating areas. As a result, the applicant had previously agreed to the condition of approval regarding noise; therefore, no amplification or outside speakers was allowed for the development. (See resolution approving the final development plan for the site on page A3.) 2 However, the restaurant that would now like to go into this space wishes to have outside amplification of music, therefore, the applicant is requesting that that condition be eliminated from the approved plan. A sound study was done by David Braslau Associates, Inc., which concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. (See Sound Study on pages A9 —A28, and the specific conclusion on page Al2.) The result of the speakers turned up to those decibel levels the result would be a decibel level of no greater than 40 dBA at the residential boundary to the east. (See page A21 of the Sound Study.) The sound readings would comply with the State Noise Standards as attached on pages A29 —A34.) The sound study further concludes that ambient noise or existing noise generated in the area provides more noise than would be generated from the outdoor music when measured at the residential lot line on the east side of the lake. (See page A21.) Final Development Plan Review . Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The comprehensive plan designates the site for commercial use. The proposed use is permitted within the MDD -6 zoning district, which this property is designated. No variances were requested as part of the original approval. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; The proposal is for an amendment to the final development plan; therefore, a preliminary development plan is not necessary in this instance. c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The proposal to allow outdoor amplification would not be detrimental to surrounding properties. A sound study was done by David Braslau Associates, Inc., which concludes that a maximum sound level of 60 -65 dBA would be acceptable for the site, and would not exceed the States acceptable 3 decibel readings at residential property. (See Sound Study on pages A9 — A28.) Sound levels from the amplification would not exceed ambient sound levels at the residential lot line on the east side of the lake. (See page A21.) d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; There is no change in the uses that were originally proposed for the site. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; Again, the proposed plan does not change the square footage of the building. Therefore, there would not be an increase in traffic. t) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and Again, there are no significant changes to the building. The applicant would be required to obtain all necessary permits regarding building construction of the new glass panels and the fire place. An amplification permit would be necessary for the outside speakers. (See attached City Code provision regarding "Loudspeakers or similar devices," and the permit application on pages A35 —A36.) Please note that the speakers would be required to be turned off by 10:00 pm. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Primary Issue • Are the proposed amendments to the final development plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed amendments would meet all applicable City Code requirements. The previous final development plan that was approved for this site did not include any variances. Therefore, they are entitled to the uses and plan that were presented. Outside amplification is an allowed M use, as long as acceptable decibel levels are met, and a loudspeaker permit is obtained. Therefore, it is reasonable to allow this use on the site. 2. The sound study by David Braslau Associates, Inc., concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from. the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. (See Sound Study on pages A9 —A28, and the specific conclusion on page Al2.) 3. The proposed revisions to the building elevation meet all minimum zoning ordinance requirements and would meet the acceptable building materials that would be allowed by City Code. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the city council approve the amendment to the final development plan at 7311 France Avenue for Cypress Equities. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2) The sound study done by David Braslau Associates, Inc., concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. Approval of the final development plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) Building must be developed per the building elevations date stamped June 24, 2010. 2) Outdoor amplification is allowed for building C. Decibel levels may not exceed the state noise regulations. 3) A "Loudspeaker" permit must be obtained from the City of Edina, and meet all applicable conditions of the permit, including that the loudspeakers must be turned off at 10:00 pm. 4) All other conditions required in Resolution 2007 -63 would continue to be in effect, unless otherwise stated above. Deadline for a city decision: , oAt- f S d0 I� 5 , Carlyle /Cypress Edina, LLC 3343 Douglas Avenue, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75225 June 10, 2010 Mr. Cary Teague, AICP Planning Director City of Edina 4501 W. 50'x' Street Edina, A4N 55424 Re: Centennial Shops — 7311 France Avenue, Edina MN Dear Mr. Teague: "KE49-)u t- - As you are aware, Cypress Equities has entered into a long term lease with a high quality dining and entertainment tenant known as Pinstripes that will occupy the entirety of the lake building of our development located at 7311 Prance Avenue. As has been discussed on numerous occasions, Pinstripes is keenly interested in opening and operating its business in a manner that is satisfactory to the community's interest as well as alleviating any concerns regarding noise issues in the neighborhood. On June 5, 2007, Cypress Equities entered into a Final Development Plan with the City of Edina, which contained, among other items, several City Council imposed conditions for Centennial Shops. One of these imposed conditions was a requirement that "no amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" (condition #15). As Pinstripes strongly desires to play amplified music on its outdoor patios and balconies, our request is have the City of Edina remove this condition by amending the Final Development Plan. In an effort to alleviate any sound concerns regarding the removal of this condition which prohibits amplification for outdoor restaurants, we believe that the following thoughts are reasonable "solutions" to the issues being discussed, and we would propose that the City and Pinstripes /Cypress work together to accomplish these mutual goals. First, with regard to amplified music, Pinstripes and Cypress Equities very recently completed a Sound Level Assessment by David Braslau Associates, Inc. to help determine, in a very scientific manner, the affects of an activated balconylpatio (inchisive of playing amplified music) on the surrounding neighborhood. The conclusions of this report are very straight forward and clearly state that the sound generated from the activity of Pinstripes' outdoor areas will not create audible levels that are greater than those ambient levels that currently exist at surrounding neighborhoods. Second, with respect to the specific prohibition on "outside amplified music," Pinstripes requests that it be allowed to play "amplified" background music on the outside patios and balconies as long as the decibel level is below 65 at the property line, in which case (per the attached sound analysis) such background music will not be audible at the path adjacent to the lake on the far east side. Upon initial design, Pinstripes will be able to set the volume level of music, and also kI Mr. Cary Teague, AICP City of Edina Page 2 the location and direction of its speakers, and sound engineers will ensure that the decibel levels will be such that the music will be background in nature and will not be heard across the lake. Third, please note that the attached Sound Level Assessment does not contemplate the attenuating affects of a glass wall that could be erected to further mitigate any sound reaching the Coventry development. This Sound Level Assessment does, however, discuss the vast attenuating affects of the existing glass windows at the site and the fact that interior sound generated at Pinstripes will not be heard by any establishment in the Coventry. That said, we are still open to erecting a frill length (from floor to ceiling) glass wall at the balcony corridors as earlier proposed, but only in response to the City of Edina allowing for outdoor amplified music for outside enclosed and/or non - enclosed areas. In conclusion, we want to again thank the City of Edina for their attention to our request for an amendment to our Final Development Plan that will allow for the conditional "amplification of outdoor restaurants" at Centennial Shops. As always, we welcome any questions or comments that you may have and we look forward to discussing this with you soon. Best regards, J. Kirk Williams, CC1M Senior Vice President of Development Cc: Brett Witzig Dale Schwartz Enclosures) A;L- Ph (214) 561 -8800 Fax (214) 253 -1600 iZESOLUTION NO. 2007 -63 °1 .. APPROVING AMENDIMENT TO IvfASTER PLAN ?'A AND AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ` CYPRESS EQUITIES f ,'il_1� (,i �''k- iIINI BE 1T RESOLVED, that the Amendment to the N.-laster Plan and Final Development Plan requested by Cypress Equities for 73'11 France Avenue based upon the plans submitted at the June 5, 2007 City Council meeting is I)ereby approved including setback variances along the west and north sides of the properly. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval is subject to the following conditions: I- Subject to staff approval, the site mUSt be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 4, 2007- date changed to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council • Grading; plan date stamped April 4, 2007. • [Building elevations clate stan)ped April,[, 2007 - date changed to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council, 2. Final grading, drainage and utility plans, submitted with the building permit, are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 3. Providing storm water best mamag;ement• practices on site and submission of plans and specifications to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval, The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 4. Execution of a developer's agreement, 5. Dedication of a transit easement across the property. 6. A cross access easement is required to allow access to 7373 France Avenue, properly to the south. 7. Submission of proof of permission (easements) to City Engineer from the owner of 7235 France Avenue to access 7311 Trance Avenue across their property; or S. Submission of plans and specifications to I-tennepin County Engineer for work completed with County right -of -way; 9. Agreement to provide a signal agreement and roadway modification permits with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 11. RecLll7t Of Executed amendment to existing; covenants agreement addressing park maintenance assessment if trees are allowed to be removed in the park. Submission of plans and specifications to Park Director for any proposed work to City park properly for approval. 12. The Centennial Lakes paths must remain open mid usable throughout the construction of the project. 13. The bituminous pathway must be milled and overlaid. 14. Developer must prepare plans for covering; and reducing sound of the outdoor delivery area . and regulate delivery time to reduce nuisance effects to adjoining properties. 15. No alllplification is allowed for ouldour .restaurants. . 16. Approvals do not include any signag;e. Separate sign permits would be required for any signage. Signs that do not meet the sign ordinance would require variances. 17. The project shall be built with materials as shown on the plans and specs, and the parking structure shall have louvers on all four sides with the north side elevation architectimil details and augmented landscaping; acceptable to L'dina city staff. Adopted this 5i1, day of June, 2007. Al TEST: hi" Debra A. Mangen, City 016rk James B. Hovland, Mayor City Hall �� 952- 927 -5£161 ,0901 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 13;26.0:390 EDINA, NIINNF.SOTA, 55.124- 1.39 -1 TTY 952.026.0:379 .r 1� Perspective Existing Stone Veneer New Stone Fireplace /New Glass 8 Aluminum Entry Vestibule ,---Exlsting Wood Cladding Pinstripes June 24th, 2010 Edina, Minnesota Aria Group Architects, Inc. ....... ---- . . . . . . . . . . .... South Elevation I US Pinstripes June 24th, 2010 Edina, Minnesota ■ Aria GroupArdtitecta, Inc. ^, 1 . ... ` [ Persoective += °. � Existing Stone Veneer New Stone Fireplace New Glass & Aluminum En" Vestibule Existing'Alood Cladding New Metal Fence to Match Existing New Sliding Glass Doors Existing Metal Columns ew eta Fence 0 Match Exist mg Doo _ �- . Pinstripes June 24th, 2010 Edina, Minnesota N w Aria Group Architects, Inc. South Elevatk cl^ Stone Veneer me Fkeplau Wood Cladding -r Existing Raging to Remain New Metal Panels at Low Well Pinstripes June24th 20,0 Edina, Minnesota ■■ Aria Group Amhitects. Inc. -J Pinstripes -1st floor plan Scale ne xi, 2010 Edina, Minnesota ■� hYGrsy A,�eeK 4. oQ Pinstripes - 2nd floor plan Edina, Minnesota Scale VS" - V-0" ti June 24, 2010 Sound Level Assessment Pinstripes Restaurant Edina, Minnesota Prepared for Cypress Equities Dallas, Texas by David Braslau Associates, Inc. 1313 5`h St. SE Suite 322 Minneapolis, MN 55414 612- 331 -4571 May 2010 P Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. ............................... 2 2.0 NOISE CONCEPTS AND TERMINOLOGY ................................. ............................... 3 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ............................... ............................... 4 4.0 AMBIENT SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ........................... ............................... 6 5.0 SOUND LEVEL PREDICTIONS ..................................................... ............................... 9 5.1. Sound Level of Voices and Music on the Deck of Patio .................. ............................... 9 5.2. Sound Level Projections ................................................................... ............................... 9 6.0 RESTAURANT AMPLIFIED SOUND SIMULUATION ............ ............................... 12 6.1. Sound Simulation Setup ................................................................. ............................... 12 6.2. Patio Sound Simulation .................................................................. ............................... 12 6.3. Deck Sound Simulation .................................................................. ............................... 13 7.0 MUSIC INSIDE THE RESTAURANT .......................................... ............................... 14 8.0 RECOMMENDED AMPLIFIED SOUND LIMITS ....................... .............................16 APPENDIX A Photographs of Loudspeaker for Sound Simulation Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. AID Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment List of Figures Figure 3.1 Proposed Restaurant Location and Sound Level Analysis Sites ....... ..............................5 Figure 4.1 Statistical Sound Level Distributions at Site 1 ................................... ..............................7 Figure 4.2 Statistical Sound Level Distribution at Site 2 .................................... ............................... S Figure 5.1 Sound Level Projections of Voices and Music ................................... .............................10 Figure 5.2 Average Spectra at Receptor Sites with Predicted Music and Voices Spectra ............ 11 Figure 7.1 Estimated Sound Level at Site 2 from 80 dBA Music Inside the Restaurant ..............15 List of Tables Table1.1 Minnesota Noise Standards .................................................................. ..............................2 Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page i All Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Pinstripes Restaurant is to be located on the west side of Centennial Lakes North Park in Edina, Minnesota. To the east of the lake is the residential community of Coventry Townhomes. The nearest unit in the development is approximately 290 feet east of the proposed restaurant. Residences at the southeast comer of the lake are approximately 500 feet from the restaurant. Pinstripes is a bowling, bocce, and bistro establishment, two stories tall. Bowling will be an indoor activity. There will be seating areas on the ground floor patio and on the deck. Pinstripes will be open year round; however outdoor activity will be minimal to non- existent at times due to weather conditions. The facility will be operating into the nighttime hours. The objectives of this sound level assessment are to establish the existing ambient sound levels at the Coventry Townhomes, to demonstrate compliance with state noise standards of any sound emanating from the restaurant, and to establish limits on amplified sound to ensure minimum impact on the existing ambient sound level environment at the residential area. Potential impacts are assessed with respect to the State of Minnesota nighttime noise standards and measured existing ambient sound levels. Ambient sound level measurements were made at the two locations shown on Figure 3.1 to represent existing background sound levels at the Coventry Townhomes. These readings were taken on Saturday afternoon and evening, May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. The conditions were selected to represent a typical summer evening when the Pinstripes deck and patio would be in operation. Sound level projections were made of voice and music at each of the two residential sites from the deck, patio, and triangular deck. Based upon these projections, expected sound levels are well below the Minnesota nighttime L10 55 limit and also well below the ambient level at each of the sites. Simulation of sound levels from the deck and patio was performed to provide an opportunity to measure sound levels from the proposed restaurant and used to establish limits to have minimal impact on the Coventry Townhomes development. Because of considerable ambient noise and the need to clearly associate any observed or measured sound form the simulation loudspeaker, a unique swept sine wave signal was used that could be easily recognized. Based upon theoretical predictions and simulated sound testing on the restaurant patio and deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the ground level patio. Because the deck is higher and more exposed to the environment, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 60 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the deck. While no simulated signals were generated from the triangular part of the upper deck, the theoretical predictions which take into account additional distance from the lake show that a sound level on this portion of the deck would be about 5 dBA lower than at the east end of the deck. Therefore, for amplified sound on the triangular portion of the deck, it is recommend that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. l� Page 1 1 Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina MN Sound Level Assessment 1.0 INTRODUCTION The objectives of this sound level assessment are to establish the existing ambient sound levels in the vicinity of the proposed Pinstripes Restaurant in Edina, Minnesota, and to assess expected sound levels in the residential area across the lake to the east and the level of background sound from loudspeakers that can be provided on the deck and patio with windows open without impacting the areas. For varying sources such as voices and background music, the Minnesota L10 standard, or that level exceeded for 10% or 6 minutes of an hour, is the applicable standard. Since residential land uses or receptor sites are involved and the restaurant could operate beyond 10 pm into the nighttime (10 pm to 7 am) hours as defined in the Minnesota rules, sound levels from the restaurant will be compared with the L10 55 dBA residential nighttime standard. The state noise standards (MN Rule 7030.0040) are presented in Table 1.1. Sound levels in the table are specified in terms of the dBA or A- weighted decibel. It should be noted that, while these are receiving land use and not source standards, they have been interpreted by the state as applying to sources that impact the receiving land use. Thus, they do not include ambient levels not associated with the source in question. This sound level metric or measure is commonly used throughout the world in evaluating environmental and community noise levels and is a single number that combines all frequencies of sound by weighting the level of individual frequencies similar to that which is done by the human ear. Table 1.1 Minnesota Noise Standards This sound assessment analyzes the most sensitive receptor sites which are the closest residential structures to the site that would be exposed to sound from the restaurant. For this study, two sites were selected to represent the residential neighborhood east of the lake are shown on the aerial photograph in Figure 3.1. Site 1 was chosen to represent the area at the southeast end of the lake. Site 2 was chosen to represent the closest residence to the proposed patio and deck. Ambient sound levels were measured in the afternoon to describe existing daytime levels and after 10 pm to represent existing nighttime levels. Spot ambient spectral (or multiple frequency) sound levels were also taken at these sites to help establish permissible background sound levels in the restaurant without having a significant impact on existing sound levels. Sound levels in the neighborhood are currently dominated by traffic on France Avenue, on Parkland Avenue, especially the bridge at the south end of the lake, the fountain in the lake, sound from park walkway loudspeakers, pedestrian conversations on the walkway along the lake, persons using paddle boats on the lake, and overflying aircraft. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 2 Daytime 7 am to 10 m Ni httime 10 pra to 7 am Noise Area Classification L10 L50 L10 L50 NAC -1 (residential) 65 60 55 50 NAC -2 commercial 70 65 70 65 NAC -3 (industrial) 80 75 80 75 This sound assessment analyzes the most sensitive receptor sites which are the closest residential structures to the site that would be exposed to sound from the restaurant. For this study, two sites were selected to represent the residential neighborhood east of the lake are shown on the aerial photograph in Figure 3.1. Site 1 was chosen to represent the area at the southeast end of the lake. Site 2 was chosen to represent the closest residence to the proposed patio and deck. Ambient sound levels were measured in the afternoon to describe existing daytime levels and after 10 pm to represent existing nighttime levels. Spot ambient spectral (or multiple frequency) sound levels were also taken at these sites to help establish permissible background sound levels in the restaurant without having a significant impact on existing sound levels. Sound levels in the neighborhood are currently dominated by traffic on France Avenue, on Parkland Avenue, especially the bridge at the south end of the lake, the fountain in the lake, sound from park walkway loudspeakers, pedestrian conversations on the walkway along the lake, persons using paddle boats on the lake, and overflying aircraft. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 2 Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment 2.0 NOISE CONCEPTS AND TERMINOLOGY An excellent introduction to noise levels and common terminology can be found in the publication by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota which was updated in October 2008 and can be found at the following website: htlp://www.pca.state.mn.us/l)ublications/R-szen6-0i.pd f Excerpts from the guide's summary are presented below: Minnesota's noise pollution rules are based on statistical calculations that quantify noise levels according to duration over a one -hour monitoring period. The L10 calculation is the noise level that is exceeded for 10 percent, or six minutes, of the hour, and the L50 calculation is the noise level exceeded for 50 percent, or 30 minutes, of the hour. There is not a limit on maximum noise. The statutory limits for a residential location are L10 = 65 dBA and L50 = 60 dBA during the daytime (7:00 a.m. — 10:00 p.m.) and L10 = 55 dBA and L50 = 50 dBA during the nighttime (10:00 p.m. — 7:00 a.m.) (Minn. State Noise Pollution Control Rules 7030.0040). This means that during the one -hour period of monitoring, daytime noise levels cannot exceed 65 dBA for more than 10 percent of the time, and cannot exceed 60 dBA more than 50 percent of the time. Decibel levels of common noise sources 140 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Jet Engine (at 25 meters) 130 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Jet Aircraft (at 100 meters) 120 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Rock Concert 110 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Pneumatic Chipper 100 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Jackhammer (at one meter) 90 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Chainsaw, Lawn Mower (at one meter) 80 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Heavy Truck Traffic 70 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Business Office, Vacuum Cleaner (at three meters) 60 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Conversational Speech, Typical TV Volume 50 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Library 40 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Bedroom 30 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Secluded Woods 20 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Whisper The L 10 level is commonly used to address varying sources, i.e. sources that are not continuous such as mechanical equipment. Potential sound levels from the proposed restaurant are compared with this standard to ensure that the restaurant will be in compliance with state noise standards. In addition to compliance with state rules, limits on background music sound levels are recommended to ensure minimal impact on existing ambient sound levels. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc.' Page 3 Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina MN Sound Level Assessment 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION The proposed Pinstripes Restaurant is to be located on the west side of Centennial Lakes North Park in Edina, Minnesota. To the east of the lake is the residential community of Coventry Townhomes. The nearest unit in the development is approximately 290 feet east of the proposed restaurant. Residences at the southeast corner of the lake are approximately 500 feet from the restaurant. Pinstripes is a bowling, bocce, and bistro establishment, two stories tall. Bowling will be an indoor activity. There will be seating areas on the ground floor patio and on the deck. Pinstripes will be open year round; however outdoor activity will be minimal to non - existent at times due to weather conditions. The facility will be operating into the nighttime hours. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. �� Page 4 r Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. MN Sound Level Assessment Figure 3.1 Proposed Restaurant Location and Sound Level Analysis Sites Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 5 Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina MN Sound Level Assessment 4.0 AMBIENT SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Ambient sound level measurements were made at the two locations shown on Figure 3.1 to represent existing background sound levels at the Coventry Townhomes. These readings were taken on Saturday afternoon and evening, May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. Weather conditions were ideal for sound level monitoring, i.e. no wind, no precipitation, and moderate temperatures. The conditions were selected to represent a typical summer evening when the Pinstripes deck and patio would be in operation. Continuous statistical sound levels for one hour were collected using Larson Davis Model 700 Type 2 Sound Level Meters using 1- minute intervals to identify any unusual occurrences during the monitoring period. Spot sound level readings were also taken using a Casella CEL 593 Type 1 meter at each of the continuous monitoring locations as a check on the continuous readings and to provide a basis for establishing limits on amplified sound from the restaurant to ensure minimum impact on existing ambient sound levels. A range of statistical descriptors were taken that help characterize the ambient noise environment. The LO (level exceeded 1% or 36 seconds per hour) represents the noisiest events during the hour. The L 10 (level exceeded 10% or six minutes per hour) represents relatively loud levels that regularly occur in the hour such as passing traffic. The L50 (level exceeded 50% or 30 minutes per hour or median level) is often used to represent the average noise level during the hour. The L90 (level exceeded 90% or 54 minutes per hour) is commonly used to represent the ambient or background sound level environment since it is only quieter than this for six minutes of the hour. Statistical distributions of sound level at Site 1 are shown on Figure 4.1. Statistical distributions of sound level at Site 2 are shown on Figure 4.2. Traffic noise, especially at 5 pm on a weekday, is considerably higher than during other periods. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. �` Page 6 �b A � A o H d 0 a 0 a e d y n'{ Q C_ O O w m m 17:33 17:37 17:43 17:48 17:53 17:58 18:03 18:08 18:13 18:18 18:23 18:28 18:33 18:38 0 c 22:05 22:10 22:15 22:20 22:25 22:30 22:35 22:40 22:45 22:50 22:55 23:00 23:05 23:10 Lxx (dBA) cwri o can o ccn o cci, o C r` I CD • i CD • Ai► • T_ Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment 70 65 60 55 CO 50 J 45 40 35 30 a0 � O M aD N CO '5: V' M V to O O _ _ N N M M O O N N N M M V O a0 O2 cO O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Figure 4.2 Statistical Sound Level Distribution at Site 2 Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 8 Hour Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina MN Sound Level Assessment 5.0 SOUND LEVEL PREDICTIONS 5.1. Sound Level of Voices and Music on the Deck of Patio Predicted sound levels from voices on the deck and patio were based upon published speech level spectra of loud male and female voices Predicted sound levels from music from loudspeakers on the deck and patio were based upon a measured spectrum of typically loud classical music adjusted to a level of 70 dBA at 16 feet from a loudspeaker. 5.2. Sound Level Projections Sound level projections of voice and music at each of the two residential sites from the deck, patio, and triangular deck are shown in Figure 5.1. Based upon the theoretical projections of sound levels, expected sound levels are well below the Minnesota nighttime L10 55 limit and also well below the ambient level at each of the sites. The spectral characteristics of the monitored ambient sound levels shown in Figure 5.2 are compared with the predicted spectra for voices and speech at the nearest residence (Site 2). When any frequency associated with voices or amplified music lies below the ambient spectrum, the sound is generally considered to be inaudible. The figure shows that the spectra for voices and amplified music are well below the ambient spectrum at all frequencies and are therefore likely to be inaudible under the observed conditions. Without crickets at night some music if played at 70 dBA on the patio may be minimally audible although levels below 70 dBA will likely be masked by ambient sound levels. Based upon theoretical predictions and simulated sound testing on the restaurant patio and deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the ground level patio. Because the deck is higher and more exposed to the environment, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 60 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the deck. While no simulated signals were generated from the triangular part of the upper deck, the theoretical predictions which take into account additional distance from the lake show that a sound level on this portion of the deck would be about 5 dBA lower than at the east end of the deck. Therefore, for amplified sound on the triangular portion of the deck, it is recommend that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. A40 Page 9 �7 l/ Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment Predicted Home Levels [Voice level based on 40 people on balcony with half speaking at a loud voice effort] [Music level based on L10 70 dBA at 15 ft from loudspeakers] [10:00 pm monitored L10 levels are also shown] 60 50 40 a m D 30 J 0 w 20 10 0 Residence 2 ambient at 10 pm - 56 dBA Residence 1 ambient at 10 pm - 53 � r I I r- I 4 i - Voices - Deck Voices - Patio Voices - Music - Deck Music - Patio Music - TriangleDeck TriangleDeck Figure 5.1 Sound Level Projections of Voices and Music Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 10 • Res 1 • Res 2 Pinslripes Restaurant — Edina MN Sound Level Assessment LOW 50.0 40.0 m w 30.0 a c 3 O U) /^Wr, 001 10.0 — 0 Site 1 5pm --=—Site 1 10 pm --�— Site 2 5 pm —Site 2 10 pm - 0 Voices on Deck at Site 2 ---* — Music 70 di3A at 15 feet KRONE deck sitting around 10 tables Wth half of them speaking at the same time with loud 0.0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 2 S 2 = = 2 22 2 = 2 2 2 = 2 2 2 S N N C1 N Om N S O O ( N N m Y O Figure 5.2 Average Spectra at Receptor Sites with Predicted Music and Voices Spectra Prepared for- Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Pa ,I r 0.0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 2 S 2 = = 2 22 2 = 2 2 2 = 2 2 2 S N N C1 N Om N S O O ( N N m Y O Figure 5.2 Average Spectra at Receptor Sites with Predicted Music and Voices Spectra Prepared for- Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Pa ,I Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina MN Sound Level Assessment 6.0 RESTAURANT AMPLIFIED SOUND SIMULUATION 6.1. Sound Simulation Setup Simulation of sound levels from the deck and patio was performed to provide an opportunity to measure sound levels from the proposed restaurant and used to establish limits to have minimal impact on the Coventry Townhomes development. The simulation also provides an opportunity to substantiate predicted sound levels or identify potential problems with the simulation setup. Because of considerable ambient noise and the need to clearly associate any observed or measured sound form the simulation loudspeaker, a unique swept sine wave signal was used that could be easily recognized. Photos of the equipment placement are included in Appendix A. Only the top loudspeaker shown in the photos was used in the patio and deck simulation tests. While any loudspeakers would be directed away from the residential area or mounted in the ceiling, the speaker faced the residential area in the simulation to provide a clearer signal for the test and the opportunity to measure the free field sound level unimpeded by reflections off the exterior glass wall along the patio and deck. The signal was calibrated at 60, 70 and 80 dBA at a distance of 16 feet, which is the approximate distance of ceiling speakers or column mounted speakers facing away from the residential area. 6.2. Patio Sound Simulation By plotting the time history of the measured sound level spectrum, it is possible to "see" how sound behaves over time. Since the test used a unique periodic signal sweeping from low to high frequency, it could be easily identified among the complex sound environment created by existing sources in the area. For example, sharp high random peaks at high frequencies due to bird songs or from voices along the walkway around the lake could not be confused with a steady periodic sound level. During the measurement at Site 2 with a loudspeaker on the patio, the signal could just be heard when listening carefully for the signal. The ambient sound level just after the test was measured at 48 to 49 dBA. The sound level with the 70 dBA test signal was measured at 48 to 49 dBA so the overall level did not change. The predicted L10 70 dBA amplified music level from the patio at Site 2 was 35 dBA (Figure 5.1). While the simulated 70 dBA level could not be measured since it was below the background level, it is estimated that the maximum simulated signal at Site 2 would have measured approximately 38 to 39 dBA. Since the L10 for music can be 4 to 10 dBA below the maximum level, a music level with maximuT' mTevel of 70 dBA would have an estimated L10 of 30 to 35 dBA which compares favorably with the predicted L10 Level of 35 dBA. With the test signal strength on the patio increased to 80 dBA, the time history sound level measurement at Site 2 clearly showed the periodic signal and the sound was clearly audible at this level. The overall dBA level with the 80 dBA signal was about 50 dBA, or 1 to 2 dBA above ambient. If the 80 dBA signal is subtracted from the total level using decibel subtraction, the sound level due only to the 80 dBA signal alone is estimated to be 48 to 49 dBA. This is consistent with the estimated 10 dBA lower 70 dBA signal level which was estimated in the paragraph above at 38 to 39 dBA. Thus, based upon the sound simulation, a maximum level of 70 dBA for amplified sound on the patio could be considered an upper limit. To provide some margin of safety a maximum level of 65 dBA when measured 16 feet from a loudspeaker in the direction of the Coventry Townhomes, could be set as an initial target for level on the patio. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 12 AJ 3 Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina. MN Sound Level Assessment At Site 1, an initial test signal level of 80 dBA was followed by a lower signal of 70 dBA. While the 80 dBA signal could be clearly identified from the data, the 70 dBA signal was again lost in the ambient sound. The ambient sound level at Site 1 was measured at 45 dBA compared with 48 to 49 at Site 2. The measured sound level with the 80 dBA signal was 48 dBA, or an increase above ambient of 3 dBA. Using decibel subtraction, the 80 dBA signal at Site 1 should measure 45 dBA. Thus, a 70 dBA signal would be 10 dBA lower or 35 dBA. With the L10 level for music 4 to 10 dBA lower, the music L10 level would be expected to be about 25 to 30 dBA (compared with 35 dBA at Site 1). This value is also consistent with the lower predicted music L10 level at Site 1 shown on Figure 5.1. While the 70 dBA signal is about 5 dBA lower at Site 1 than at Site 2, the ambient level at Site 1 is also lower by about 3 dBA. Therefore, a 70 dBA limit to amplified sound on the patio is expected to have a similar minimal impact on the ambient at Site 1. The 65 dBA maximum limit on amplified sound on the patio should therefore provide the same protection or safety margin at Site 1 as at Site 2. 6.3. Deck Sound Simulation For the deck sound simulation at Site 2, the test began with the 80 dBA signal followed by the 70 dBA signal. The 80 dBA signal could be clearly identified in the data. After dropping the level by 10 dBA to 70 dBA, some periodicity from the test signal could still be detected. Unfortunately no reading was taken at the 60 dBA level since wind was beginning to be a factor and additional readings at Site 1 were needed. However, a 5 dBA reduction in the test signal to 65 dBA would not be sufficient to bring the signal down below the ambient level at Site 2. Therefore, a limiting level of 60 dBA would be needed for amplified sound on the deck to ensure minimum audibility at the nearest residence (Site 2). The 80 dBA signal from the deck at Site 1 was not clearly audible and was masked by other sharp high frequency peaks that were due in part by birds and in part by the wind which was starting to rustle leaves in the area and adding to the high frequency levels. Reducing the signal to 70 dBA did not have any effect on the sharper high frequency peaks, confirming that these were due to sources other than the test signal. When the signal was reduced to 60 dBA and the meter sensitivity increased to capture that level, wind on the microphone as well as in the trees dominated the sound level although no periodic peaks associated with the 60 dBA signal could be detected. Thus, based upon the deck sound simulation data for Site 2 and Site 1, a 60 dBA level should ensure minimum audibility at these sites. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 13 401_ Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment 7.0 MUSIC INSIDE THE RESTAURANT An additional concern addressed here is the leakage of sound from inside the restaurant to outside areas. Prior to simulating sound from the patio and deck, indoor -to- outdoor sound level measurements were made only on the patio level since glazing is identical on the first and second floor. A steady signal at 103 dBA at 10 feet with a flat spectrum from 50 Hz and above was generated inside the space and measurements taken at several distances and locations inside and outside of the space. An ambient measurement was also taken to ensure that the measured difference in sound from inside to outside was not affected by the outside sound level. The outdoor ambient level at the patio railing was 50 dBA while the test signal was measured at 63 dBA. The ambient level was more than 10 dBA below the test signal level and therefore did not affect the measurement of attenuation by the windows. . Based upon an average of readings inside and outside windows, it was determined that the windows provide an attenuation of 31 dBA. With an 80 dBA interior level at the windows, a sound level of only 49 dBA can be expected at the patio railing. When projected to the nearest residence (Site 2), the sound level spectrum would be well below the observed ambient as shown on Figure 7.1. This assumes that the patio windows are open. If the patio windows are closed, the level could drop another 25 to 30 dBA, depending upon the windows and window installation. This reduction in level would also apply to any sound on the patio or deck if the windows were closed. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 14 Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina, MN Sound Level Assessment M 50.0 40.0 M w 30.0 0 U) Me 10.0 0.0 -4- 100 Hz 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1k25 1k6 2k 2k5 3k15 4k 5k Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Figure 7.1 Estimated Sound Level at Site 2 from 80 dBA Music Inside the Restaurant Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 15 --s Music —a — Ambient Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. MN Sound Level Assessment 8.0 RECOMMENDED AMPLIFIED SOUND LIMITS Loudspeakers can be appropriately designed to direct amplified sound where it is needed and to limit sound where it is not needed. When ceiling speakers are used, an appropriate coverage angle directed towards the floor can be used to limit spillover of sound outside of the desired area. Where small loudspeakers are wall or column- mounted, they can be directed away from the residential area, carefully aimed to avoid reflections off the glass exterior, and if necessary provided with sound shielding behind to limit radiation of sound behind the loudspeaker. The recommendations below refer to limited sound levels at the edge or railing of the patio or deck which is essentially the property line of the restaurant. The sound system designer can select loudspeaker types, locations, orientation and sound levels that can comply with these limits. The sound level at the east or south edge of the patio should not exceed the limits below based upon the acoustic power needed to generate that level at 16 feet from the loudspeaker. Based upon theoretical predictions and simulated sound testing on the restaurant patio and deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA be permitted on the ground level patio. Because the deck is higher and more exposed to the environment, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 60 dBA be permitted on the deck. While no simulated signals were generated from the triangular part of the upper deck, the theoretical predictions which take into account additional distance from the lake show that a sound level on this portion of the deck would be about 5 dBA lower than at the east end of the deck. Therefore, for amplified sound on the triangular portion of the deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA be pennitted. y: \jobs\2010jobs\210029\report\pinstripes -ed ina- sound - level - assessment- draftldoe al Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 16. Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. MN Sound Level Assessment Appendix A Location of loudspeaker on the patio. The top speaker only was used for the simulation. f �x Location of loudspeaker on the deck. 1 e ri a r �rr f ' -. r^.71�'j►. '' r'° rte. .r . Q� k- - Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page l CHAPTER 7030 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL GENERALLY 7030.0010 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. 7030.0020 DEFINITIONS. 7030.0030 NOISE CONTROL REQUIREMENT. 7030.0040 NOISE STANDARDS. 7030.0050 NOISE AREA CLASSIFICATION. 7030.0060 MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY. 7030.0070 SOUND ATTENUATION MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY. 7030.0080 VARIANCE. MOTOR VEHICLE NOISE LIMITS 7030.1000 DEFINITION. 7030.1010 PROHIBITIONS. 7030.1020 SCOPE. 7030.1030 EXCEPTIONS. 7030.1040 NOISE LIMIT FOR VEHICLES OVER 10,000 POUNDS. 7030.1050 MOTOR VEHICLE NOISE LIMITS FOR MOTORCYCLES. 7030.1060 NOISE LIMITS FOR OTHER VEHICLES. GENERALLY 7030.0010 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. For the purpose of chapter 7030, American National Standards Institute, Specification for Sound Level Meters, SIA -1983 is incorporated by reference. This publication is available from the American National Standards Institute, 1430 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10018 and can be found at: the offices of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 1935 West County Road B -2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113; the Government Documents Section, Room 409, Wilson Library, University of Minnesota, 309 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454; and the State of Minnesota Law Library, 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155. This document is not subject to frequent change. The Federal Highway Administration publication, Sound Procedures for Measuring Highway Noise: Final Report, FHWA- DP -45 -1R (August 1981) is incorporated by reference. This publication is available from the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1000 North Globe Road, Arlington, Virginia 22201 and can be found at: the offices of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 1935 West County Road B -2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113; the Government Documents Section, Room 409, Wilson Library, University of Minnesota, 309 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454; and the State of Minnesota Law Library, 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155. This document is not subject to frequent change. Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 History: 11 SR 43; 18 SR 614 Posted: Deceniber 12, 2003 hall Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 7030.0030 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL 7030.0020 DEFINITIONS. 2 Subpart 1. Application. The terms used in chapter 7030 have the meanings given them in this part. Subp. 2. A- weighted. "A- weighted" means a specific weighting of the sound pressure level for the purpose of determining the human response to sound. The specific weighting characteristics and tolerances are those given in American National Standards Institute S 1.4 -1983, section 5.1. Subp. 3. Daytime. "Daytime" means those hours from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Subp. 4. dB(A). "dB(A)" means a unit of sound level expressed in decibels (dB) and A- weighted. Subp. 5. Decibel. "Decibel" means a unit of sound pressure level, abbreviated as dB. Subp. 6. Impulsive noise. "Impulsive noise" means either a single sound pressure peak (with either a rise time less than 200 milliseconds or total duration less than 200 milliseconds) or multiple sound pressure peaks (with either rise times less than 200 milliseconds or total duration less than 200 milliseconds) spaced at least by 200 millisecond pauses. Subp. 7. L10. "L10" means the sound level, expressed in dB(A), which is exceeded ten percent of the time for a one hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the commissioner. Subp. 8. L50. "L50" means the sound level, expressed in dB(A), which is exceeded 50 percent of the time for a one hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the commissioner. Subp. 9. Municipality. "Municipality" means a county; a city; a town; a regional planning and development commission established under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 473; the metropolitan council; or other governmental subdivision of the state responsible by law for controlling or restricting land use within its jurisdiction. Subp. 10. Nighttime. "Nighttime" means those hours from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 am. Subp. 11. Person. "Person" means any human being, any municipality or other governmental or political subdivision or other public department or agency, any public or private corporation, any partnership, firm, association, or other organization, any receiver, trustee, assignee, agency, legal entity, other than a court of law, or any legal representative of any of the foregoing, but does not include the agency. Subp. 12. Sound pressure level. "Sound pressure level ", in decibels, means 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure to the reference pressure. The reference pressure shall be 20 micronewtons per square meter. Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 History: 11 SR 43; L 1987 c 186 s 15; 18 SR 614 Posted: December 12, 2003 7030.0030 NOISE CONTROL REQUIREMENT. No person may violate the standards established in part 7030.0040, unless exempted by Minnesota Statutes, section 116.07, subdivision 2a. Any municipality having authority to regulate land use shall take all reasonable measures within its jurisdiction to prevent the establishment of land use activities listed in noise area classification (NAC) 1, 2, or 3 in any location where the standards established in part 7030.0040 will be violated immediately upon establishment of the land use. V?b Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Mimiesota. All Rights Reserved. L-1 Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 History: 11 SR 43; 18 SR 614 Posted: December 12, 2003 7030.0040 NOISE STANDARDS. NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL 7030.0050 Subpart 1. Scope. These standards describe the limiting levels of sound established on the basis of present knowledge for the preservation of public health and welfare. These standards are consistent with speech, sleep, annoyance, and hearing conservation requirements for receivers within areas grouped according to land activities by the noise area classification (NAC) system established in part 7030.0050. However, these standards do not, by themselves, identify the limiting levels of impulsive noise needed for the preservation of public health and welfare. Noise standards in subpart 2 apply to all sources. ibp. 2. Noise standards. oise Area Classification 1 2 3 Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 History: 11 SR 43; 18 SR 614 Posted: December 12, 2003 7030.0050 NOISE AREA CLASSIFICATION. Daytime Nighttime Lsa L10 L30 L10 60 65 50 55 65 70 65 70 75 80 75 80 Subpart 1. Applicability.The noise area classification is based on the land use activity at the location of the receiver and determines the noise standards applicable to that land use activity unless an exception is applied under subpart 3. Subp. 2. Noise area classifications. The noise area classifications and the activities included in each classification are listed below: Noise Area Classification Land Use Activities 1 Household Units (includes farm houses) Group quarters Residential hotels Q3 Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 7030.0050 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL Mobile home parks or courts Transient lodging Other residential Motion picture production Medical and other health services Correctional institutions Educational services Religious activities Cultural activities and nature exhibitions Entertainment assembly Camping and picnicking areas (designated) Resorts and group camps Other cultural, entertainment, and recreational activities. 2 Railroad terminals (passenger) Railroad terminals (passenger and freight) Rapid rail transit and street railway passenger terminals Bus passenger terminals (intercity) Bus passenger terminals (local) Bus passenger terminals (intercity and local) Other motor vehicle transportation Airport and flying field terminals (passenger) Airport and flying field terminals (passenger and freight) Marine terminals (passenger) Marine terminals (passenger and freight) Automobile parking Telegraph message centers Transportation services and arrangements Wholesale trade Retail trade — building materials, hardware, and farm equipment Retail trade — general merchandise Retail trade — food Retail trade — automotive, marine craft, aircraft, and accessories Retail trade — apparel and accessories Retail trade — furniture, home furnishings, and equipment Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Mimiesota. All Rights Reserved. & 3L 4 5 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL 7030.0050 Retail trade — eating and drinking Other retail trade Finance, insurance, and real estate services Personal services Business services Repair services Legal services Other professional services Contract construction services Governmental services (except correctional institutions) Miscellaneous services (except religious activities) Public assembly (except entertainment assembly and race tracks) Amusements (except fairgrounds and amusement parks) Recreational activities (except designated camping and picnicking areas) Parks. 3 Food and kindred products — manufacturing Textile mill products — manufacturing Apparel and other finished products made from fabrics, leather, and similar materials — manufacturing Lumber and wood products (except furniture) — manufacturing Furniture and fixtures — manufacturing Paper and allied products — manufacturing Printing, publishing, and allied industries Chemicals and allied products — manufacturing Petroleum refining and related industries Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products — manufacturing Stone, clay, and glass products — manufacturing Primary metal industries Fabricated metal products — manufacturing Professional, scientific, and controlling instruments; photographic and optical goods; watches and clocks — manufacturing Miscellaneous manufacturing (except motion picture production) Railroad, rapid transit, and street railway transportation (except passenger terminals) Motor vehicle transportation (except passenger terminals) Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Mimiesota. All Rights Reserved. Ili 3 7030.0050 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL Aircraft transportation (except passenger terminals) Marine craft transportation (except passenger and freight terminals) Highway and street right -of -way Communication (except telegraph message centers) Utilities Other transportation, communication, and utilities (except transportation services and arrangements) Race tracks Fairgrounds and amusement parks Agricultural Agricultural and related activities Forestry activities and related services (including commercial forest land, timber production, and other related activities) Fishing activities and related services Mining activities and related services Other resource production and extraction All other activities not otherwise listed. 4 Undeveloped and unused land area (excluding noncommercial forest development) Noncommercial forest development Water areas Vacant floor area Under construction Other undeveloped land and water areas. Subp. 3. Exceptions. The noise area classification for a land use may be changed in the following ways if the applicable conditions are met. A. The daytime standards for noise area classification 1 shall be applied to noise area classification I during the nighttime if the land use activity does not include overnight lodging. B. The standards for a building in a noise area classification 2 shall be applied to a building in a noise area classification 1 if the following conditions are met: (1) the building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A); (2) the building has year -round climate control; and (3) the building has no areas or accommodations that are intended for outdoor activities. C. The standards for a building in a noise area classification 3 shall be applied to a building in a noise area classification 1 if the following conditions are met: Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. k3 City of Edina Misdemeanors and Nuisances 1040.10 1040.08 Alarm Systems. No person shall permit an automatic fire alarm or intrusion alarm system under the person's control to emit, for period exceeding 20 minutes, an audible alarm which disturbs the comfort, quiet or repose of persons of normal sensibilities in the vicinity. 1040.09 Permit Necessary for Loudspeakers and Similar Devices. No person shall use or operate, or cause or allow to be used or operated, in any public street or place, or from any aircraft, or in front of or outside of any building, place or premises, or in or through any window, doorway or opening of such building, place or premises, abutting on or adjacent to any public street or place, any device, apparatus or instrument for the amplification of the human voice or any other sound or noise, or any other sound - making or sound - reproducing devices, without obtaining a permit from the City. Application for the permit shall be made to the Clerk on forms provided by the Clerk. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to permits issued under this Subsection and to the holders of such permits. The application shall require, among other information required by Section 160 of this Code, the hours and location of the proposed use, and the maximum volume (in decibels) of the proposed use. If the proposed use complies with the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code, the permit shall be granted. The fee for such permit shall be set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Subsequent violation of any provision of this Section or this Code by the permit holder shall be cause for revocation or suspension of the permit pursuant to Section 160 of this Code. This Subsection shall not apply to emergency vehicles or loudspeakers and similar devices used by the City. 1040.10 Participants as Violators. Any person on the premises or at the place from which any noise emanates which violates the provisions of this Section, and who is participating in the activity for which or from which the noise is being made, shall be deemed to be making, or allowing to be made, the noise in violation of this Section. History: Ord 1032 codified 1970; amended by 1032 -AI 8- 12 -81, 1032 -A2 9- 29 -82, 1032 -A3 9- 10-84; Ord 1995 -6 8- 17 -95; Ord 2007 -10, 06 -05 -07 Reference: Minnesota Rules, 1991, Chapter 7010 Cross Reference: Sections 160, 185 1040 -3 � 3s" ZrIA, CITY OF EDINA w9�1r� 4801 WEST 50TH STREET o e EDiNA, MN 55424 cn Y p 952 - 927 -8861 �v ay Application for Loudspeaker Permit • `N�APORAS�9 eBH Fee: $21.00 cNUWO*. D&- -dHMM AWmd b/PD App-jedbyCkrk 1120.4137 The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Edina, Minnesota, as a request to permit the use of loudspeaker (s) on the outside of a structure in accordance with Edina City code 1040 and any amendments thereto: NAME OF APPLICANT ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: Phone Number: Location of Requested Use: Description of Event:: Date (s) Permit Requested: (City, State, Zip) Organization (if any): From (hours) To Maximum Volume (In Decibels) (The maximum allowed by Code is 65 decibels no more than 10% of the time in one hour period of time (6 minutes) and no more than 60 decibels for more than 50% of the time in a one hour period.) THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number or Social Security Number. This information may be used to deny the issuance, renewal or transfer of your license if you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties, or interest. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, the State of Minnesota Driver License Section, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, and Ramsey County Warrant Office. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. Your residence address and telephone number will be considered public data unless you request this information to be private and provide an alternative address and telephone number. Please sign below to indicate that you have read this notice: Signature X private data. My alternative address and telephone number areas follows: Addre Applicant agrees to the following: request that my residence address and telephone number be considered Telephone 1. That this loudspeaker permit is solely for use at the time requested above. 2. All noise shall cease at 10:00 p.m. or upon receipt of a complaint of excess noise and subsequent determination of violation by a Police Officer. 3. That the use of a loudspeaker without a permit is a violation of Edina City Code 1040 as amended. 4. If for a new use, all residents living within a 200 -foot radius have been contacted and do not object to the use of a loudspeaker. 5. The applicant will be responsible for supervising and controlling any persons operating amplifiers or loudspeaker equipment. Date: x Signature of Applicant Approved copy to Applicant (date) Approved copy to P.D. Revised 12 -22 -2009 xb w CYPRESS EQUITIES A.Ml 'W 4 N�ll■..l ie. *- 1 V 4► THE DISTRICT RETAIL + RESTAURANT Edina, Minnesota w " A M twr sl te Plan 6 Gmal Fdlmt & la-11 A¢hlle,h PRECAST GONCKM PANELS STONE f'RE-FNG1NFFRU3 MEIA1 CANOPY Al LIMINt IM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ML IAA WAROWW RTSL Et 20' -0' (675.DV) PE RF. MTL PANEL ON PTD, STL ANGLE FRAME, lyp. CYPRESS EQUITIES A. I.M., of -W-1R -- k-- METAI I OLIWR QNGIMNJ.0�* SYSTEM EL 68'- 3- (924.2S) TOP -QFPANE EL 63'.0-(918.0') GAJWCE LEVEL 5 -4 EL SW 6- (913.5 - GWGE LEVEL 4 k F1 496'(901 V) U U. 'y 15, w (A91 F 1 3 1 9 GNwGE I I Vf I I — ------- - -------- - --- ------ -- ----- ---------- ---------- GAPAIQL LEVEL f Et 18 0"B73 EIFS - U " IW" 'STOREFRONT 7. THE DISTRICT RETAIL+ RESTAURANT Edina, Minnesota 11. 6u9ch1Er, Mr. South-Elevation— 22 Good Fultm & Farrell AFChIIeCtS C 0 residential tower from this project,. adding he is,�a bit disappointed in the retail element of the project-. Mr. Rohlf said in his opinion the existing Centennial Lakes retail area is not successful, pointing out a number, of store fronts are. vacant and businesses appear to continually move in and out. Concluding, Mr. Rohlf said his concern is with the location of thlarking ramp. COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT: f. Mr. Kirk Williams, commented that given the location and size of the site whatever is considered and consActed will be dense. Mr. Williams asked the Commission to review this plan on its own merits. Acting Chair Fischer closed'public comments: COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners continued to express their reluctance to amend the code. Commissioners recognized that, Centennial Lakes is a gem within the City of Edina; and the suggestion to amend the code during the Comprehensive Plan amendment stage seems premature. Confusion was also expressed that it appears this site is being required to "make up for the ills of the past ", and the proposed amendment to the code coming at the same time as the request for final development only enforces that appearance. Commissioners also observed any redevelopment in the district should be considered with.- '.the whole and each s, proposal should be looked at individually. ACTIONS BY THE COMMISSION: Commissioner Brown moved to recommend denial of the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to deny carried. P -07 -2 Final Development Plan Cypress Equities 7311 France Avenue Mr. Teague presented his staff report informing the Commission the applicant is proposed to tear down the old AMC theatre building and construct a 31,000 square foot single level retail building (along France) and a 22,000 square foot retail building with a five level parking ramp above and to the south a 32,960 square foot two -level retail /restaurant. The total square footage of both buildings is 86,000 square feet. .,V 7 A31 residential tower from this project, adding he is a bit disappointed in the retail element of the project. Mr. Rohlf said in his opinion the existing Centennial Lakes retail area is not successful, pointing out a number of store fronts are vacant and businesses appear to continually move in and out. Concluding, Mr. Rohlf said his concern is with the location of the parking ramp. COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT: Mr. Kirk Williams, commented that given the location and size of the site whatever is considered and constructed will be dense. Mr. Williams asked the Commission to review this plan on its own merits. Acting Chair Fischer closed public comments. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners continued to express their. reluctance to amend the code. Commissioners recognized that Centennial Lakes is a gem within the City of Edina, and the suggestion to amend the code during the Comprehensive Plan amendment stage seems premature. Confusion was also expressed that it appears this site is being required to "make up for the ills of the past ", and the proposed amendment to the code coming at the same time as the request for final development only enforces that appearance. Commissioners also observed any redevelopment in the district should be considered with the whole and each proposal should be looked at individually. ACTIONS BY THE COMMISSION: Commissioner Brown moved to recommend denial of the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to deny carried. P-07 -2 Final Development Plan Cypress Equities 7311 France Avenue Mr. Teague presented his staff report informing the Commission the applicant is proposed to tear down the old AMC theatre building and construct a 31,000 square foot single level retail building (along France) and a 22,000 square foot retail building with a five level parking ramp above and to the south a 32,960 square foot two -level retail /restaurant. The total square footage of both buildings is 86,000 square feet. 7 A0 Mr. Teague explained the request requires an amendment of the overall Centennial Lakes Master Plan; and a Final Development Plan. Mr. Teague concluded staff recommends approval to the Master Development Plan and Final Development Plan approval based on the following findings: Approval is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. and subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Site plan date stamped April 4, 2007. Grading plan date stamped April 4, 2007. Building elevations date stamped April 4, 2007. 2) Final grading, drainage and utility plans, submitted with the building permit, are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 3) Providing storm water best management practices on site and submission of plans and specifications to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 4) Execution of a developer's agreement. 5) Dedication of a transit easement across the property. 6) A cross access easement is required to allow access to 7373 France Avenue, property to the south. 7) Submission of proof of permission (easements) to City Engineer from the owner of 7235 France Avenue to access 7311 France Avenue across their property; or 8) Submission of plans and specifications to Hennepin County Engineer for work completed with County right -of -way; 9) Agreement to provide a signal agreement and roadway modification permits with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 44A 8 10) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 11) Receipt of Executed amendment to existing covenants agreement addressing park maintenance assessment if trees are allowed to be removed in the park. Submission of plans and specifications to Park Director for any proposed work to City park property for approval. 12) The Centennial Lakes paths must remain open and usable throughout the construction of the project. 13) The bituminous pathway must be milled and overlaid. 14) Developer must prepare plans for covering and reducing sound of the outdoor delivery area; and regulate delivery time to reduce nuisance effects to adjoining properties. 15) No amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants. 16) Approvals do not include any signage. Separate sign permits would be required for any signage. Signs that do not meet the sign ordinance would require variances. . APPEARING FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr. Brett Witzig and Mr. Kirk Williams, Cypress Equities and Mr. Farrell of Good, Fulton, Farrell and Ms. Kathy O'Connell, MFRA. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners expressed concern over the location of the proposed parking ramp, ramp lighting, exterior building materials (ramp), and the landscaping and screening elements of the project- (especially as they relate to the park). Commissioners also raised questions on easements along France Avenue and Gallagher Drive and if those easements were established as Right - of -Way ( ROW) would building setbacks become an issue if the ROW were expanded. Discussion from the Commission also focused on the -mixed -use aspect of the project with the majority of the Commissioners indicating they didn't feel the project as proposed met the requirements of the current ordinance as it relates to the mixed -use zoning district. Commissioners also acknowledged their concern that the current project doesn't provide a residential element (mixing the uses). Commissioner Risser observed that regardless of the overall development plan or code requirements Centennial Lakes was developed with the residential element east of the lake, adding she also observed there is no residential A dr{ , 9 element on the east side of France Avenue. Planner Teague acknowledged that statement was correct. Planner Teague pointed out Centennial Lakes was developed in phases and at that time city staff believed amending the overall development plan was the best way to proceed. Mr. Teague reiterated the present city attorney believes the best way to resolve the non- conforminity that currently exists at Centennial Lakes would be to amend the code. COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT: Mr. Witzig told the Commission lighting on the proposed ramp is down -lit and should not spill onto the residential properties. Mr. Witzig acknowledged the potential for right -of -way taking by the County; however, at this time that component is unknown. Mr. Farrell, informed the Commission Cypress Equities held a neighborhood meeting informing neighbors of this proposal. With graphics Mr. Farrell pointed out the plan, including landscaping materials, building materials on the retail buildings and ramp to include the use of louvers., parking, traffic circulation, lighting and signage aspects of the project to including "art" along the west elevation of the building. SPEAKING FROM THE PUBLIC: Mr. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, told the Commission he supports the project. He added the project is better than looking at a brick wall, and the proposed louver materials used on the ramp are a good choice of materials. Mr. Robert Rohlf, 7400 Edinborough Way, expressed concern over the retail component of the project noting there already is a vacant restaurant in the Centennial Lakes retail shops. Mr. Rohlf stated it isn't much fun walking past vacant store fronts. Mr. Peter Jarvis, 1016 Coventry Place, stated he believes what is proposed is superior to the existing theatre. Mr. Jarvis said he believes any lighting problem would be solved by the exterior louver system on the parking ramp. Acting Chair Fischer closed the public comments. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners continued to express concern over the lack of a residential component with this project, and the relationship of the parking ramp to the park area. Commissioners stated they highly support the mixed -use element of the code, adding in the majority's opinion this proposal doesn't achieve that element. Commissioners also expressed concern that the proposed signage, especially AV 10 the use of "art" along the building wall may not comply with the sign code. Commissioners acknowledged the position their lack of enthusiasm for the project places the applicants in; however, could not see their way to approve the project as submitted. ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION: Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend denial of the Final Development Plan and Amendment to the Overall Development Plan for Cypress Equities noting the following findings - the proposed development is not in conformance with the current ordinance; the proposed development is not mixed - use; the proposed development does not take advantage of the public park; questions remain on ramp placement, materials used on the ramp, public safety concerns, signage considerations and lighting issues. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Ayes; Forrest, Brown, Schroeder, Staunton, Scherer, Fischer. Nays; Risser. Motion carried. III. INTERGOVERNMENTAL 13U51NtU,: - �_-= .� Edi As A Fit City )iceilpating y Acting CFtair Fischer told the Commission since Edina is py� in being a "Fit Cite';, he has thought a lo about how to become better fit" himself. Continuing, Acting Chair Fischer said'-Re considered biking as one option; however, he though that as a group th Commissi p si ould continue to look at Edina and find w ys to achieve a healthy livingstandard for all Edina residents. Acting Chair Fischer pointed out mixed- uso` areas are areas where residents could walk to amernties instead of being tied to their vehicles. Acting Chair Fischer said the Comprehensive. Plan i6 also a good tool to use to implement healthy living through the bike: task force, etc. Continuing, Acting Chair Fischer said he also came up with,tlie idea of Commissioners taking a walking tour of the Greater Southdale a I Commissionet Scherer stated shd thinks the walking -tour is a great idea and further suggested that Commissioners could also walk either as a group or individual_�fdifferent areas of the City to test pedestrian friendliness. Concluding, Commis loner Scherer said another-, ideo tlat cameo to her would be to walk_..`! Edina 's c j parks. - r _ -- Commissioner Schroeder suggested as part of the Comprehensive Plan that the city include an element on "healthy living ". Commissioner Schroeder agreed with Acting Chair Fischer's suggestion that incorporating "healthy living" into the Comp Plan is a good idea and suggested that the Commission invite a guest to a Comp Plan task force meeting that could speak to the Commission on what it takes to be a "fit city". Planner Teague responded those are great ideas, 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING O Page 2 of 8 Mr. eague noted the original master development plan called for 1,085 dwelling units and 1,506,55 squar feet of non - residential uses. The zoning ordinance was drafted to fit the original master pl howev , actual development includes 348 dwelling units and 1,217,935 square feet of non -resi ntial uses. He oted that strict interpretation of the ordinance would require any redevelopment to strictly residentia ' order to comply with the original master plan and zoning. Mr. Teague expla' d the applicant re uested the requested ordinance amendment to bring the site into complianc . e added staff recommende approval of the proposed amendment; however, he noted the Planning ommission recommended enial of the amendment. The Council aske questions gathering further understanding of the issue incl ing the following: noting without the amen nt no additional non - residential uses may be built; ar s within the MDD -6 District likely to be redevelop d; look at as two issues; short term fix with amen ent; long -term as part of Comp Plan Update; co ern expressed considering an ordinance ch a and final development plan at the same meeting; and th need for looking at more than the MDD- District during the Comp Plan update. Public Comment Laurie Miller, representing Sharon Ming, 1103 Coventry Place, to deny the ordinance amendment. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, Member Swenson made a motion, Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Sy Motion carried. 7 Equities spoke in favdr of the proposed amendment. she suppgfted the Planning Commission's recommendation proposed amendment. proposed amendment. ed by I ember Masica closing the public hearing. Hovlan The Council discussed the roposed amendment. The is es discussed included: concern over considering an ordiFme�nit amendment at the same meeting Nsa red evelopment proposal; realization the issue must be addreairness to developers; applaudinanning Commission's concern for housing, and develo of a vision for Southdale area. Following the lie comment, the Council discussed the matter. Member Masica made a motion granting fir, reading and waiving second reading to Ordinan a No. 2007 -09 amending Section 850 of Ed' a City Code regarding non - residential floor area in a MDD -6 District. Member Benne econded the motion. Ay : Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland y: Swenson Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-63 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN — CYPRESS EQUITIES — OLD AMC THEATER SITE Affidavits of publication were presented and placed on file. Mr. Teague explained Cypress Equities proposed to tear down the old 40,000 square foot AMC Movie Theater and build a 31,000 square foot single level retail building along France Avenue and a 22,000 square foot retail building with a five -level parking ramp above. Attached to the south would be a /r4 http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil— MeetingMinutes /20070605Reg.htm 6/24/2010 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING O Page 3 of 8 32,960 square foot two -level retail/restaurant. Mr. Teague said the total square footage would 86,000 square feet. He noted this was a revision without the residential tower of the project proposed for the site in 2006. Mr. Teague stated the redevelopment request would require the following actions: an amendment of the overall Master Plan and a Final Development Plan. He continued stating the staff felt the proposal was reasonable because: the proposed uses would be permitted in the MDD -6 District; the project would encourage pedestrian movement; the project met zoning ordinance regulations; and the proposed retail use was generally consistent with the original master development plan. Mr. Teague reported the Planning Commission recommended denial of the amendment to the master development plan and final development plan for the site at 7311 France Avenue with the following Findings: • The proposed development is not in conformance with current ordinance. • The proposed development is not mixed -use. • The proposed development does not take advantage of the public park. • The location of the ramp adjacent to the lake. • The commission was not satisfied with the materials used on the parking ramp. • Public safety concern regarding on -site circulation. • Concern signage and lighting. Mr. Teague stated staff recommended approval of the amendment to the master development plan and final development plan at 7311 France Avenue for Cypress Equities because the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. He stated the following conditions of the approval: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 4, 2007- date changed to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council • Grading plan date stamped April 4, 2007. • Building elevations date stamped April 4, 2007 - date change to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council. 2. Final grading, drainage and utility plans, submitted with the building permit, are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 3. Providing storm water best management practices on site and submission of plans and specifications to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 4. Execution of a developer's agreement. 5. Dedication of a transit easement across the property. 6. A cross access easement is required to allow access to 7373 France Avenue, property to the south. 7. Submission of proof of permission (easements) to City Engineer from the owner of 7235 France Avenue to access 7311 France Avenue across their property; or 8. Submission of plans and specifications to Hennepin County Engineer for work completed with County right -of -way; 9. Agreement to provide a signal agreement and roadway modification permits with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 11. Receipt of executed amendment to existing covenants agreement addressing park maintenance assessment if trees are allowed to be removed in the park. Submission of plans and specifications to Park Director for any proposed work to City park property for approval. 12. The Centennial Lakes paths must remain open and usable throughout the construction of the project. 13. The bituminous pathway must be milled and overlaid. 44 � http: / /www.ci.edina. inn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl20070605Reg.htm 6/24/2010 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING O Page 4 of 8 14. Developer must prepare plans for covering and reducing sound of the outdoor delivery area and regulate delivery time to reduce nuisance effects to adjoining properties. 15. No amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants. 16. Approvals do not include any signage. Separate sign permits would be required for any signage. Signs that do not meet the sign ordinance would require variances. Developer Presentation David Farrell, 9444 Sherwood Glen, Dallas, Texas, Good Fulton and Farrell, Architects for the project presented the revised project using a graphic power point and description. He walked through the site plan, the elevations from north, east, south and west, the shadow studies and the proposed landscaping plans. Mr. Farrell responded to Council's specific questions and also introduced Kirk Williams, Vice President of Cypress Development, who also responded to specific questions regarding the proposed redevelopment. Council questions included the location of valet parking, the location of the loading area in the parking structure, which plan was the one that would actually be built, why there was no parking under the retail structure, potential tenants of the project, whether the retail would be one or two stories, and why the parking was proposed at the current level. Public Comment John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, supported the redevelopment project as proposed. Gene Persha, 800 Coventry Place, supported the redevelopment project as proposed. JoEllen Deever, 7405 Oaklawn Avenue, supported the project as proposed. Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Place, asked what type of retail was proposed. Wanda Frazier, 7340 York Avenue, asked if the restaurants would be locally owned or large franchises. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, closing the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Following the public comment, the Council discussed the matter. Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2006 -63 and moved its adoption, seconded by Member Bennett, granting Final Development Plan to Cypress Equities for the old AMC Theater Site on France Avenue with the sixteen conditions noted earlier by Mr. Teague, plus: noting the site and elevation plans shall be dated June 5, 2007, the project shall be built with materials as shown on the plans and specs, and the parking structure shall have louvers on all four sides with the north side elevation architectural details and augmented landscaping acceptable to Edina city staff . Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland Nay: Swenson Motion carried. *RESOLUTH)"O. 2007 -65 ADOPTED GRANT13WT41NAL PLAT_- Motion made by Memb oush and seco �dditiyon�, ber Masica adopting Resolution No. 2007- 65 approving the Final Plat for France Avenue. Motion carried on r o e — five ayes. c 447 http: / /vvww.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil— MectingMinutes /20070605Reg.htm 6/24/2010 June 23, 2010 Edina Planning Commission: Michael Fischer, Chairman Stephen Brown Jeff Carpenter Arlene Forrest Floyd Grabiel Julie Risser Nancy Scherer Michael Schroeder Kevin Staunton Re: Public Hearing June 30, Request to Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 "Approving Amendment to Master Plan and Final Development Plan, Cypress Equities" I respectfully request that the Planning Commission reject Applicant's June 11, 2010 request to eliminate Condition #15, "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants ", for the following reasons: 1) Applicant's June 11 request was not timely. Requests for consideration at June 30 Planning Commission meeting were due May 28 per City of Edina Planning Department web site. 2) Applicant's June 11 request is incomplete. Revised elevations reflecting contemplated building changes not included with June I 1 request. Wood Burning Fireplace(s) - "... take in the attractive smells of natural firewood from its outdoor fireplace." (Kirk Williams May 31, 2010 letter to City Council, page 1.) Sliding Glass Walls - " ... we are still open to erecting a full length (from floor to ceiling) glass wall at the balcony corridors as earlier proposed, but only in response to the City of Edina allowing for outdoor amplified music for outside enclosed and/or non - enclosed areas." (Kirk Williams June 10, 2010 letter to Cary Teague, page 2, accompanying Applicant's June 11 request.) 3) Nothing in applicant's June 11 request provides support for allowing sound amplification. The City Council's June 5, 2007 approval of the Cypress Equities Final Development Plan contemplated a two -level fine dining restaurant(s). Prohibiting amplified sound for outdoor restaurants was consistent with Council's recognition that the restaurant(s) would adjoin a City Park and was close to the many residences directly across the North Pond from the restaurant building. These facts remain unchanged. Sincerely, John E Bohan 800 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 952- 921 -0338 cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague, City Planner Roger Knutson, City Attorney 6/23/2010 11:18 AM Rol ECEI ftEA _ �r7t= Y��Cr1] (i t L-5d. /1///lOb- _gig -• �_ _" _`�Jl.✓%� �Al FROM 6 -- -:0-z - /6 AD Suite 308, 7500, York Avenue South, EDINA, Minnesota 55435 -4700. 21 June, 2010. City of Edina Planning Department. Dear Sirs, Further to your notice of 18 June, 2010, Re:- Cypress Equities Development at Lot 1, Block 1, 7311 France Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota ti F; Request:- Am°*:d Resolution No 2007 -63 . eliminate #15 .... "No Ampl4cation is allowed for outdoor restaurants ". The above request is very distressing. There are many, many residences in the immediate area of this proposed development and the owners of these would, most certainly, be disturbed during the Spring, Summer and early Autumn months. At these times we wish to enjoy our gardens and the natural sounds of the outdoors - not hear over amplified (for sure, it would be so) music. It should also be noted that within the same area there is a Senior residence with a Memory Care Section (Walker Elder Suites) and a new, similar establishment for the Edina Community is being constructed by Ebenezer at present (York Gardens). Imagine dear souls suffering from Dementia or Alzheimer's Disease being outside (or indoors with windows open) and assaulted through all the daylight hours by loud 'music' (strange sounds to them). What will it do to their health ? The new building, York Gardens, is also to have Care Suites in addition to Memory Care and Assisted Living accommodation .... should very sick /dying people in these Care Suites be subjected to such infringement on their lives and privacy ? Now consider the clients at the proposed new development; presumably a restaurant. Not all who frequent these businesses enjoy excess noise all around them during a meal. How often do people REALLY listen to the 'canned' music while eating ? All this amplification does is make everyone speak louder in order to be heard. This I have noted in such situations and the result spoils the whole dining experience. Gei:tle, subdued, low volume music indoors is fine, if absolutely necessary, but outdoors and more highly amplified, NO 1 This for the reasons given. HEASE fully consider the needs of the large number of people living within earshot of the proposed new development and the effects to these,as opposed to the lesser number who would be clients ?and do NOT amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 by eliminating #15. Thank you for this consideration. Yours faithfully, WEA, Jacqueline B. Lindman (Mrs) Jackie Hoogenakker From: Mark Johnson <baseballbooks @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:41 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Eliminating no amplification for a proposal from Cypress Equities We received your notice concerning the request of Cypress Equities to eliminate the "no amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants." Your communication on this issue is very poor. You need to be more specific in your notice. What proposed outdoor restaurant are you talking about? We don't know what is located at 7311 France Av S? We don't know anything about the applicant, Cypress Equities. Is this located near the three eateries located on France Avenue? Why not include a map showing the exact location. Your notices have a commercial tone. We don't know what that legal description represents. Could you please write this notice as you would if writing and explaining this to your own mother? Would she understand this notice? The EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION needs some lessons in communicating with it's citizens. Fac Nunc (Do it now). Thank you. Mark and Thelma Johnson 7500 York Av S Edina, MN 55435 • ECEIVE,� fhfa�R"�� Cary Teaaue From: Dianne Plunkett Latham < Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 11:45 AM To: Kris Aaker; Jackie Hoogenakker; Arlene Forrest; Cary Teague; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter, Joyce Repya; Julie Risser; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer; Michael Schroeder; Nancy Nyrop Scherer; Stephen Brown Subject: FW: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace 6 -11 -10 Dear City of Edina Planning Commissioners, Please take into consideration the following when you receive requests for restaurants with wood burning fireplaces. Dianne Plunkett Latham From: Dianne Plunkett Latham [mailto: Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:26 AM To: Ann Swenson (SwensonAnn1 @GMail.com); James B. Hovland (IHovland @ Kra useRollins.com); Joni Bennett (JoniBennettl2 @comcast.net); Mary Brindle (mbrindle @Comcast.net); Scot Housh (Scot.Housh @Willis.com) Subject: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace 5 -31 -10 Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has recently added a new step to the GreenStep Cities program, that of Local Air Quality. Due to the hazards of wood smoke to human health, to the global environment, and to our urban forest, the Air and Water Quality Working Group (AEWG) of the Energy and Environment Commission has been studying issues related to wood smoke. Although the AEWG report on wood smoke is not yet final, I am taking the opportunity to pass along some data on wood smoke, which AEWG member, Julie Mellum has provided. I am doing so because it is my understanding that at the June 1 City Council meeting, a local restaurant will be requesting having a two story wood burning fire place. I am writing to request that City Council disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. Gas inserts for indoor fireplaces and outdoor fire rings are safer and more environmentally sound then burning wood. Wood smoke: 1. Is hazardous to human health. 2. Is a major source of carbon dioxide and black carbon soot in our atmosphere. 3. Contributes to the spread of insect -borne tree disease, such as emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease. Human Health - Wood smoke emits fine particulates that contain many of the same deadly toxins that are in tobacco smoke and vehicle exhaust. They are comprised of formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, dioxins and other noxious and persistent organic pollutants that build up in our lungs, crops and water supply. Wood smoke is more concentrated than tobacco smoke, travels farther and remains chemically active in the body longer. Everyone is at risk from wood -smoke exposure. But children of all agesi'l, unborn children, the elderly, and anyone with asthma, allergies, or heart disease are in the highest -risk categories. The US Center for Disease Control states that wood smoke is a trigger for asthma attacks. Wood smoke is also implicated in cancers, reproductive birth defects and in sudden infant death syndrome. i21 A study found that people who burn wood or other "biofuels" for heat or cooking may have a heightened risk of emphysema and related lung conditions. Among non - smokers, exposure to biomass smoke was linked to a 2.5 -fold increase in the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Smokers exposed to biomass smoke, meanwhile, had a more than four -fold greater risk of COPD than non - smokers who did not burn biomass fuels at home. 131 Minnesota's antismoking ordinance allows people to go to bars and restaurants and avoid smoke, because tobacco smoke has a proven harmful effects. Yet residents have no choice but to breathe outdoor air that smells of wood smoke in most neighborhoods and in public spaces —at all times of day, in all seasons. It can even enter homes through windows, vents and cracks. 141 Wood smoke interferes with the right to use and enjoy one's own property. Black Carbon Soot - The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to set limits on black carbon, a/k/a "soot." Generated from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, black carbon is a solid particle that warms the atmosphere because its dark color absorbs heat -- both when it accumulates in the air, raising the air's temperature, and when it lands on snow and ice, accelerating, melting. Black carbon also has profound effects on public health, causing hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year.151 Forestry Issues - Gas fireplaces and gas fire rings reduce the number of trees that must be destroyed for fuel; trees help absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. The head of the United Nations Environment Program is pushing for measures to slash non - carbon dioxide greenhouse gas pollutants, including black carbon, "because they make up some 50 percent of toxic atmospheric emissions ". He stressed that "The world must deploy all available means to reduce this pollution and that no substance contributing to this pollution should be overlooked. ,, The movement of firewood contributes to the spread of tree pathogens. Emerald ash borer will soon be killing trees in Edina. According to a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) document, "America's neighborhoods are under attack. The emerald ash borer lives in firewood. Move firewood and you spread the destruction. "171 Reducing wood burning in Edina will reduce the use of firewood and thereby reduce the spread of emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease as well as any other pathogen that could be spread via firewood. In summary – Please disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. [l] Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http: / /www.sciencedaily.com/ releases /2009/11/091106084243.htm. Z "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. 3 New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: //burningissues.org / forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?f—�11 &t =3497. 4 "Facts about burning wood; Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. 5 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http:// www .biologicaldiversity.org/news/ center /articles /2010 /los- angeles- times -02 -22 2010.htm1. 6 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org/apps/ news /story.asp ?NewslD = 31952 &Cr=unep &Crl). 7 Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Dianne Plunkett Latham Member Air and Water Quality Working Group Edina Energy and Environment Commission Ill Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http: / /www.sciencedaily.com/ releases /2009/11/091106084243.htm. f2l "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. I'] New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: //bumingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?f =11 &t =3497. i4i "Facts about burning wood; Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. i51 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/ center /articles /2010 /los- angeles- times- 02 -22- 2010.html. [61 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org/apps/ news /story.asp ?NewslD = 31952 &Cr=unep &Crl). [7] Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Joyce Repya From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:54 PM To: Joyce Repya Subject: FW: Heritage Preservation Board Hi there, Can you help this person ?? Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com From: The4Square @aol.com [mailto:The4Square @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:48 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Heritage Preservation Board I am a live in Edina and d0 not want item #15 eliminated from the property at 7311 France Ave. South. We don,t need any more noise at a respected restaurant. Please follow the Edina request Vernon J Wegner 7220 York. Ave.So. Edina,MN 55435 952 831 5180 RECEIVED [67FIC7/Tlll 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: EVIE WILLIAMS <evie423 @mailstation.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:08 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: Cypress Equities Request to amend No.2007 -63 I own a Condo at 7220 York Ave. So, #423 Edina. I feel strongly that #15 in their Master Development Plan, at 7311 France Ave. South in Edina, allowing no amplification for outdoor restaurants, --------------------------------------- should remain in place. There are many condos and apartments that would be effected from the noise of the restaurant crowd which would carry across the lake in the late evening hours. Evelyn O Williams, home owner. ivy E Jackie Hoogenakker From: J RONALD BOE <fredmcboe @msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:32 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: #15 This is in response to your mailing re eliminating #15. We definitely object to eliminating #15 and allowing amplification for outdoor restaurants. That is such a beautiful part of Edina - -- please don't ruin it with noise from commercialism. Ronald and Mary Boe 7200 York Ave So #110 Edina, Mn 55435 ECEIVE � rn►r_•��r�r.�� Jackie Hoogenakker From: ROBT L ANDERSON <arobaud @msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:49 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: outdoor amplification To City of Edina Planning Department, We are NOT in favor of outdoor amplification for outdoor restaurants. That would ruin our nice parkH Robert and Audrey Anderson 7220 york Ave S #410 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Herb Froemming <herb.froemming @prodigy.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 3:24 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File: 2010.0005 -- Cypress Equities My property address is: 911 Coventry Place, Edina, MN 55435 1 am against eliminating #15 — "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from resolution No. 2007.63. Residents in the area purchased their property with the expectation of Quiet Enjoyment. With the waters of Centennial Lakes between the South Edina Development Addition and the Coventry Townhomes, any amplification of music or other sounds would carry across the waters and represent a great disturbance to the peaceful enjoyment of the residents in the Coventry and represents something not existent when these properties were purchased. I am definitely against any amplification of sounds in the area. Herbert Froemming Jackie Hoogenakker From: john harris <jharris331 @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:17 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Rousty Harris Subject: Case File 2010.0005- Cypress Equities Dear Reader, This is in response to the notice that we recently received regarding Cypress Equities' request that amplification of sound be permitted for outdoor restaurants at 7311 France Avenue. We have been Edina residents for 48 years and now own a townhome in Coventry at Centennial Lakes. While we have not objected to the proposed restaurant /entertainment project at the Cypress Equities site on France Avenue, we strongly object to the proposal that outdoor sound amplification be permitted because of the certainty that the many residents in and near Centennial Lakes will be adversely impacted and deprived of the peaceful enyoyment of their homes. It is important to note that a combination of the lake and our prevailing westerly winds will cause the noise emanating from the Cypress site to be very easily heared by those in the Centennial Lakes area whose homes are to the east of the Cypress site. We speak from experience on this subject because we also own a home in Hawaii which is located downwind from a large hotel that conducts amplified outdoor musical programs several times each week. The sound from these events carries well over a quarter of a mile downwind and each word spoken or sung at the hotel's events can be distinctly heard at our home and those nearby. It would be unfair and highly inappropriate for those of us at Centennial Lakes who regularly contribute to the maintenance of this important park area to be subjected to similar unwanted noise far into each evening. Thereforte we ask that Cypress Equities' request be denied. John and Rousty Harris 713 Coventry Lane Edina, MN 55435 (952) 921 -0314 Jackie Hoogenakker From: john harris <jharris331 @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:52 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010.0005- Cypress Equities Dear Reader, This is in response to the notice that we recently received regarding Cypress Equities' request that amplification of sound be permitted for outdoor restaurants at 7311 France Avenue. We have been Edina residents for 48 years and now own a townhome in Coventry st Centennial Lakes. While we do not and have not objected to the proposed restaurant /entertainment project at thecypress Equities cite on France Avenue, we strongly object to the proposal thatsound amplification be permitted Jackie Hoogenakker From: prehkamp @starpoint.net Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:41 PM To: jhoogenakkeer @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: 2010.0005 Thank you for the opportunity for my input. I'll be out of town on June 30th. We moved into Coventry 2 years ago because of the wonderful , quiet and very pretty park and surrounding area. I understand commerical development will happen but it should fit the neighborhood it goes into. In Minnesota we have a limited time to enjoy the parks and outdoors and having amplified sound will only detract from that special time and our home. Please don't amend Resolution No. 2007 -63. Thank you Paul & Marcia Rehkamp 903 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 507 - 829 -9756 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Nancy & Dick Nylander <nylander51 @msn.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 12:48 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File: 2010.0005 We are against outdoor amplification at the 7311 France Ave. location. We live on the north side of the 7400 Edinborough Way condominium and such amplification would effect our location a great deal. A compromise might be to allow amplification before 7: pm, but after that it would become quite a nuisance. Nancy and Dick Nylander 7400 Edinborough Way #5107 Edina, MN 55435 -5614 952 - 841 -0897 1 Jackie Hoo enakker From: Hokkanen, Eileen M. (MN10) <Eileen.Hokkanen @Honeywell.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 10:36 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities' request I received a Public Hearing Notice regarding Cypress Equities' request to eliminate the prohibition against amplification for outdoor restaurants. I have several concerns about eliminating this prohibition. There are homes in close proximity to the development that could be disturbed by this music. There is no indication as to whether or not there would be "rules" around the lifting of this prohibition — rules as to when the music could be played, or what kind of music or at what volume. Sound carries, particularly in the evening, and music from the restaurant could be disruptive to nearby homeowners as well as people in the area who are enjoying the lake. I walk the Centennial Lakes' paths, and I very much enjoy the classical music that is piped along the path. It is low volume and "non- intrusive ". I would not want music from the restaurants to disturb that experience. Nor would I want that music competing with the concerts that are held during the summer. If the Council is going to approve amplification for outdoor restaurants, I would hope there would be requirements as to type of music and volume with consideration given to those around the lake who are not at the restaurants. Eileen Hokkanen 7310 York Ave S #101 Edina, MN 55435 952 - 830 -1588 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Mark Johnson <baseballbooks @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:41 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Eliminating no amplification for a proposal from Cypress Equities We received your notice concerning the request of Cypress Equities to eliminate the "no amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants." Your communication on this issue is very poor. You need to be more specific in your notice. What proposed outdoor restaurant are you talking about? We don't know what is located at 7311 France Av S? We don't know anything about the applicant, Cypress Equities. Is this located near the three eateries located on France Avenue? Why not include a map showing the exact location. Your notices have a commercial tone. We don't know what that legal description represents. Could you please write this notice as you would if writing and explaining this to your own mother? Would she understand this notice? The EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION needs some lessons in communicating with it's citizens. Fac Nunc (Do it now). Thank you. Mark and Thelma Johnson 7500 York Av S Edina, MN 55435 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Anne Marie Gromme <amgromme @mac.com> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:52 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Anne Marie Gromme Subject: #15 re: case file 2010.0005 It is hard for me to understand why the planning commission would even consider this proposal. The residents around Centennial Lakes purchased their properties based on, among other things, the fact that this is primarily a residential neighborhood. We already have nice quiet music piped tastefully and directionally through the speakers around the lake during daytime hours. What we do not need or want is additional music, of some eatery's choosing carrying across the water into our homes. Please vote no to the amendment to Resolution N. 2007.63 proposed by Cypress Equities. That resolution was endorsed for a very good reason. A question to you is: Why do we have to keep revisiting these issues, many of which have been put into place relatively recently? Cypress Equities is constantly testing you, the commission, and us, the neighborhood. Why do you put up with that? Where is it written that we have to with their proposals every few months? Anne Marie Gromme 602 Coventry Lane Edina 55435 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Wendy Amundson <wramundson @aol.com> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:26 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities request This is in response to the Public Hearing Notice mailed last week regarding Cypress Equities' request to eliminate the prohibition against amplification for outdoor restaurants. With homes directly across from the development that could be disturbed by the noise, I don't think this is an appropriate situation to grant a variance. I think all of us who walk Centennial Lakes' pathways enjoy the classic music that is piped in, but that is at a very low sound level that allows it to be pleasant background music. Cypress gives no indication (at least that I have access to) of what kind of music they plan to play, at what volume, and during what hours, which concerns me greatly. Should the City Council decide to allow amplification, I strongly recommend that it be with conditions regulating the level of sound, the hours allowed and the type of music. Wendy Amundson 7310 York Ave So, #106, Edina, MN 952 - 835 -4613 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Per Christensson <sharpened @mac.com> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 3:46 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010.0005 Feedback Edina Planning Dept, I understand the concerns with Cypress Equities' requested amendment, but I think a bowling alley / casual event venue would be perfect for the vacant location next to The Container Store. This area currently does not have any good late -night entertainment places, and the lot across Centennial Lakes would be a great place to have one. I hope we can come to some agreement that allows Pinstripes or a similar company to move into the venue without causing too much late night noise. Thanks, Per Christensson sharpened (d,)mac.com Jackie Hoogenakker From: Peggy Moineau <peggyjmae @yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:41 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file: 2010.0005 To Whom it Concerns: My husband and I live in the Centennial Lakes area and received notification about Cypress Equities' request to eliminate #15 "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution N. 2007.63. We would like to request that you leave the statute in place. We have lived where amplification is allowed and have found it to be very intrusive for the residents in the area. Regards, Philippe and Peggy Moineau Jackie Hoogenakker From: Michael Waring <m.g.wa ring @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 7:18 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Public Hearing Notice - Case File: 2010.0005 To whom it may concern: As one who has requested the late night and early morning intervention of the Edina Police Department a number of times to address trucks idling overnight, machine cleaning of the Target parking lot, and loud car stereos behind the Fedex/Kinko store among other noise complaints, I first ask the rhetorical question: why does an outdoor restaurant need amplification? There is no need to answer my question, but I can state that I am opposed to the elimination of item #15 from the project description. Michael Waring 7220 York Ave So #417 Edina 956- 952 -0220 Jackie Hoogenakker From: GARY PHILLIPS <garyphillips2 @msn.com> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:17 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: gp 6 -19 to: city of edina planning department from: g phillips 7350 york avenue south edina mn 55435 thank you for telling me of public hearing re request of cypress equities to eliminate #15 of resolution no 2007 -63. with cypress equities on the property at 7311 france, the damage is already done. nevertheless i request that you eschew approval of all unrelenting requests by cypress equities to change terms it agreed to earlier. it is my hope that cypress equities will leave your area. Jackie Hoogenakker.,., - From:. Marlowe Iverson <ivy @mainsol.net> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:13 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Lot 1, Block 1 Edina Development Addition Gentlemen, My wife and. <I live at 7220 York Ave. S. #404, Edina 55435. We want no amplification for the subject restaurant. Marlowe Iverson 1 I (] 1❑ Q Ip 0 Ir b C. RAE f? /Nst��ES C INTERIORS, LTD.. Z ` | \ � . ! \ \ �-/ ° " �-. ' . . \ ) ^ | , ID % ° | / | \ i / � P C. RAE . |mTsaxzpxs. cro. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:19 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes - please forward to Mayor FYI Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 ibennerotteCaD-ci.edina.mn.us From: Arnold Bigbee [mailto:arniebi @me.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4 :05 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Fwd: summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes - please forward to Mayor Jennifer, as promised. Arnie Begin forwarded message: • ECEIV _ OR Rf From: Arnold Bigbee <arnieb1(ame.com> Date: June 9, 2010 11:12:01 AM CDT To: Howl Susan <showl _ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes - please forward to Mayor Susan, please forward this note to the Mayor. Thank you. Jim, my wife and I visited the Pinstripes location in a suburban development on Higgins Rd. in South Barrington. The food and service were excellent. We dined outside and I noticed that the sound system had speakers attached to each large umbrella over the outdoor tables. We had no sound interference with our meal conversation. The bocce ball outdoor courts (about 30 feet from us) were being used but we noticed no noise from those courts. The bowling alleys were separated from the restaurant by a 10 - 12 foot wide opening that was able to be closed off w /sliding doors. There were many families in the facility eating and playing. The decor is "upscale" with lots of art on the walls and tile and hardwood flooring. There were many small dining areas, each w/8 -15 tables. There were also 4 -6 smaller rooms for groups of up to 15 for birthday partie,. and other gatherings. The ballroom seating up to 300 was on the second floor. We saw one fire pit which was not active during our visit. The facility did not have a "sports bar" feel or sound nor did we see the clientele one would expect to see at a sports bar (i.e., groups of people cheering while watching sports contests on large screen tv's). We were favorably impressed with the operation as a family food and fun destination. I also need to share that, although Pinstripes offered to compliment our meals, I declined that offer and paid for our meals. My wife and I believe that Pinstripes would be a good neighbor in Centennial Lakes if other neighborhood concerns can be addressed. I have sent a few photographs to you via Susan and will leave menus and other material from Pinstripes at your office on Wed afternoon. Please call me if you have any questions I can answer. Arnie Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:18 PM To: Brian Smith; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: photo showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area FYI Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 ibennerotteCa�ci.edina.mn.us From: Arnold Bigbee [mailto:arniebl @me.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:05 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Fwd: photo showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area Begin forwarded message: From: Arnold Bigbee <arnieb1 _me.com> Date: June 9, 2010 10:46:37 AM CDT To: Howl Susan <showl : ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: photo showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area Begin forwarded message: From: arnieb1 <arnieb1 _me.com> Date: June 8, 2010 2:22:24 PM CDT To: Bigbee Arnold <arnieb1 Ame.com> . . . - Sent from my Whone Sent from my iPhone Jackie Hoogenakker From: Thomas Beckley <thomas.beckley @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:16 PM To:" Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities hearing June 30 I reside at 7220 York #211 I am strongly against any outdoor music or amplifiers at 7311 France. The location is almost line of sight from my condo& the noise will deminish the neighborhood. There are many home owner residences very close to this location. We want to leave our windows open at night. Thank you, Tom Beckley thomas. beckleykgmail . com 952- 841 -0869 Home 612 - 910 -2419 Cell C ENV � rr •� Jackie Hoogenakker From: J C MENTH <jbrooney @q.com> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 7:33 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: loud music My condo is at 7220 York Ave.So. in Edina. We are very close to 7311 France So. I am against any amendment to (2007 -63) article #15. I enjoy the quiet music from the speakers along the walkway at Cenntenial Lakes. I do NOT want any loud music in the area esp. at night. Thank you. ]enine Menth ECEIV � � 4A, qg T 0M • f�roRPORATv/ IBBB REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. J. Fom: Debra Mangen ® Action City Clerk F Discussion Information 10 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -54 Authorizing Use Of Central Count Ballot Counter For Primary and General Elections ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: Legislation passed during the 2010 session changed the method of counting absentee ballots from sending them out to individual precincts to instead having a central location for each municipality. In order to comply with this legislation in an efficient manner, Hennepin County Elections has leased two large central count machines for use by all of Hennepin County. One will be located in downtown Minneapolis and one will be located at Minnetonka City Hall. Edina will be traveling to Minnetonka to count their absentee ballots. This equipment will be provided by the County at no cost to local jurisdictions. Minnesota Statute 206.58 requires the governing body of each municipality to provide for the use of any electronic election equipment subject to the approval of the County Auditor. In order to comply with statute, staff is requesting the Council adopt a resolution authorizing the use of the central count equipment. Attachments: Resolution No. 2010 -54 RESOLUTION No. 2010 -54 AUTHORIZING ELECTION EQUPMENT CENTRAL COUNTER FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS City of Edina WHEREAS, legislation enacted during the 2010 legislative sessions requires that absentee ballots be counted at a central location and not disseminated to individual precincts; WHEREAS, Hennepin County Elections has leased for use at the Primary and General Elections two central count Model 650 Ballot- counters from Election Systems and Software. The Model 650 has been certified for use by both the federal government and the Minnesota Secretary of State; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 206.58 requires the governing body of a municipality to provide for the use of electronic voting systems within their jurisdictions subject to approval by the county auditor. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby authorizes and approves the use of the aforementioned central counting election equipment for counting of absentee ballots. Passed and adopted this 6th day of July, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 6, 2010 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET www.cit ofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 y I REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. K. From: John Keprios, Direc qDe Park and Recreation ar tment ® Action F-1 Discussion . ❑ Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Grant Acceptance & Approval of Agreement For Outdoor Hockey Rinks Project Hennepin County Youth Sports ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the Council accept the $60,000 grant awarded by the Hennepin Youth Sports Program of Hennepin County and approve the Agreement for Outdoor Hockey Rinks Project as submitted and required by Hennepin County. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: I am pleased to inform the Council that Hennepin County has accepted the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission's recommendation to award a grant not to exceed $60,000 to the City of Edina for our outdoor hockey rinks project. Our project includes replacement of the outdoor hockey rink boards, light standards and light fixtures at Walnut Ridge Park and Pamela Park. The Agreement requires that a permanent plaque be placed at each site identifying that the Project was made possible by funds from the Hennepin Youth Sports Program. I am proposing that the plaque read as follows: OUTDOOR HOCKEY RINKS PROJECT The replacement of this outdoor hockey rink facility was made possible by funds from the Hennepin Youth Sports Program of Hennepin County. The total project cost is $120,000 which is equally funded by our 2010 Capital Improvement Plan. The $60,000 grant monies are paid to the City of Edina only after the entire project is completed. If approved by Council, both hockey rink replacements will be completed by the end of October 2010. Contract No: A101029 AGREEMENT FOR OUTDOOR HOCKEY RINKS PROJECT This Agreement is between the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "COUNTY "), A -2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487, and the City of Edina, 4801 West 50'h Street, Edina, MN 55424( "LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT " herein "LGU "). Recitals 1. Section 473.757, subd. 2 of Minnesota Statutes authorizes Hennepin County to make grants for youth activities and youth and amateur sports within Hennepin County with certain funds collected as part of the sales tax authorized in Section 473.757, subd. 10 of Minnesota Statutes. 2. Pursuant to Hennepin County Board Resolution 09- 0320R3, Hennepin County created the Hennepin Youth Sports Program. The Hennepin Youth Sports Program makes grants for youth sports and activities and amateur sports within Hennepin County. 3. In 2010, as part of the Hennepin Youth Sports Program, by Resolution No. 10 -0227, Hennepin County authorized an award of $60,000 to the LGU for the Outdoor Hockey Rinks Project ( "Project "). NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: The parties agree as follows: TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT The LGU agrees to complete the Project described in Section 2 by April 30, 2011. The COUNTY agrees to contribute, an amount not to exceed $60,000 to the LGU for the Project. 2. USE OF FUNDS The LGU shall use all funds received under this Agreement for construction of the Project in accordance with the application submitted by the LGU to the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission. The application for the Project dated March 29, 2010 is on file with Hennepin County and this application is incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. The LGU shall be solely responsible for securing all additional funds needed for completion of the Project. The LGU agrees that the Project will include a permanent plaque or sign, as agreed to by the LGU and COUNTY, identifying that the Project was made possible by funds from the Hennepin Youth Sports Program. 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES Payment shall be made directly to the LGU upon the presentation of a claim in the manner provided by law governing the COUNTY'S payment of claims and/or invoices. The LGU shall submit invoices for Project expenses with a letter which will be furnished by the COUNTY (see Attachment B). Payment shall be made within forty-five (45) days from receipt of the invoice. All funds shall be paid to LGU after COUNTY has agreed that the Project is complete, demonstrated by a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR LGU shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services. Nothing is intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of co- partners between the parties or as constituting LGU as the agent, representative, or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose. LGU is and shall remain an independent LGU for all services performed under this Agreement. LGU shall secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any personnel of LGU or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by LGU will have no contractual relationship with the COUNTY and will not be considered employees of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall not be responsible for any claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of any personnel, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against LGU, its officers, agents, LGUs, or employees. LGU shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind from the COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Re- employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 6. NON - DISCRIMINATION A. In accordance with the COUNTY's policies against discrimination, LGU agrees that it shall not exclude any person from full employment rights nor prohibit participation in or the benefits of, any program, service or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, or national origin. No person who is 2 protected by applicable Federal or State laws against discrimination shall be subjected to discrimination. 7. INDEMNIFICATION LGU agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of LGU, a subcontractor hired by the LGU, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss by reason of the failure of LGU to perform any obligation under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the LGUs of any statutory or common law defenses, immunities, or limits on liability. The LGUs cannot be required to pay on behalf of themselves and COUNTY to a third party, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one party. The limits of liability for COUNTY and LGUs may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for LGUs. 8. DATA PRACTICES LGU, its officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subLGUs. shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 ( MGDPA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality. If LGU creates, collects, receives, stores, uses, maintains or disseminates data because it performs functions of the COUNTY pursuant to this Agreement, then LGU must comply with the requirements of the MGDPA as if it were a government entity, and may be held liable under the MGDPA for noncompliance. LGU agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from any claims resulting from LGU's officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subLGUs' unlawful disclosure and/or use of such protected data, or other noncompliance with the requirements of this section. LGU agrees to promptly notify the COUNTY if it becomes aware of any potential claims, or facts giving rise to such claims, under the MGDPA. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 9. RECORDS — AVAILABILITY /ACCESS Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, LGU agrees that the COUNTY, the State Auditor, the Legislative Auditor or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, 3 and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of LGU and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. LGU shall maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 10. SUCCESSORS SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENTS A. LGU binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the COUNTY for all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the contract documents. B. LGU shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become due to it without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. A consent to assign shall be subject to such conditions and provisions as the COUNTY may deem necessary, accomplished by execution of a form prepared by the COUNTY and signed by LGU, the assignee and the COUNTY. Permission to assign, however, shall under no circumstances relieve LGU of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. C. LGU may subcontract for the services to be performed pursuant to this contract. Permission to subcontract, however, shall under no circumstances relieve LGU of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. Further, LGU shall be fully responsible for the acts, omissions, and failure of its subLGUs in the performance of the specified contractual services, and of person(s) directly or indirectly employed by subLGUs. Contracts between LGU and each subLGU shall require that the subLGU's services be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified. LGU shall make contracts between LGU and subLGUs available upon request. 11. MERGER AND MODIFICATION A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter. All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. 4 12. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION A. If LGU fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, it shall be in default. Unless LGU's default is excused by the COUNTY, the COUNTY may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. Additionally, failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall be just cause for the COUNTY to delay payment until LGU's compliance. In the event of a decision to withhold payment, the COUNTY shall furnish prior written notice to LGU. B. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to the COUNTY under this Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity. C. The COUNTY's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement. D. This Agreement may be canceled with or without cause by either party upon thirty (30) day written notice. G. Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination of this Agreement include but are not limited to: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR; INDEMNIFICATION; DATA PRACTICES; RECORDS - AVAILABILITY /ACCESS; DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION; PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS. 13. CONTRACT PROCESSING AND ADMINISTRATION The Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission ( "MASC ") will serve as staff liaison in the grant process administration. Responsibilities will include but not be limited to: forwarding all required grant processing documents to LGU; and forwarding appropriate documents to COUNTY for processing and/or execution (i.e., grant contract and invoice requests). MASC will serve as contact for grant administration and/or processing inquiries. Kimberly Spates, or successor (County Contract Administrator), shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY and serve as contract liaison between the COUNTY and LGU. 14. COMPLIANCE AND NON - DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION A. LGU shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, rules and ordinances currently in force or later enacted. B. If the source or partial source of funds for payment of services under this Agreement is federal, state or other grant monies, LGU shall comply with all applicable conditions of the specific referenced or attached grant. C. LGU certifies that it is not prohibited from doing business with either the federal government or the State of Minnesota as a result of debarment or suspension proceedings. 15. NOTICES Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party under this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be sent registered or certified mail. Notices to the COUNTY shall be sent to the County Administrator with a copy to the originating Department at the address given in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. Notice to LGU shall be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. 16. PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE LGU agrees that the terms "Hennepin County" or any derivative shall not be utilized in any promotional literature, advertisements of any type or form or client lists without the express prior written consent of the COUNTY. 17. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 6 LGU AUTHORIZATION *LGU: By: Its: And: Its: organized under: Statutory Option A - Option B Charter, *LGU shall submit applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the time LGU returns the Agreement to the COUNTY. Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship. Reviewed by the County Attorney's Office Date: COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA BY: Chair of Its County Board ATTEST: Deputy /Clerk of County Board Date: And: Assistant/Deputy /County Administrator Date: 7 [IF THE CONTRACT IS WITH A USE THIS SIGNATURE PAGE. IF A IS ORGANIZED UNDER THE STATUTORY STANDARD FORM OR UNDER OPTIONAL PLAN A, THE MAYOR AND CLERK MUST SIGN AND THE CORPORATE SEAL MUST BE AFFIXED; UNDER OPTIONAL PLAN B, THE MAYOR AND MANAGER MUST SIGN; UNDER CHARTER, INQUIRE OF WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN. A NOTARY IS NOT REQUIRED, HOWEVER, A CERTIFIED COPY OF COUNCIL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT MUST BE ATTACHED.] M. REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. L. From: Roger N. Knutson City Attorney ® Action Discussion Information Date: July 6, 2010 Subject: Resolution Designating City Manager on an Interim Basis ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -55. The resolution designates Heather Worthington as City Manager on an interim basis. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Gordon Hughes' last day as City Manager is July 31, 2010. Because the search process for a new City Manager has not been completed and a new City Manager has not commenced employment, an interim City Manager should be designated. Only the City Manager is authorized by law to perform certain tasks and sign certain documents. The appointment will avoid any uncertainty about the authority of an Assistant City Manager can act when the City Manager's position is vacant. ATTACHMENTS: The resolution is attached. RESOLUTION NO. 2010-55 RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY MANAGER ON AN INTERIM BASIS RECITALS A. The incumbent City Manager, Gordon Hughes, has submitted his resignation effective July 31 st, 2010. B. The City is conducting a search for a new City Manager and a new City Manager will not commence employment with the City by August 1 st, 2010. C. Heather Worthington is the incumbent Assistant City Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Effective August 1, 2010 Heather Worthington is appointed City Manager or an interim basis until such time as a new City Manager commences employment with the City. 2. This appointment shall carry with it the duties and responsibilities associated with the office of City Manager, and Heather Worthington shall be listed as a signatory on all city accounts. Attest: ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this sixth day of July, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of July 6, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this sixth day of July, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk REPORURECOMMEN nATIn N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Wayne Houle, PE — Public Works Director/ City Engineer Date: July 6, 2010 Agenda Item Item No: III. M. ® Action F] Discussion Information Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -57 Calling Public Hearing August 2, 2010, For Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement: No. S -106 and Normandale Road and Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement: No. S- 104 ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached resolution, No. 2010 -57, calling for Public Hearing on August 2, 2010 for Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement: No. S -106; and Normandale Road and Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement: S -104. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff is requesting public hearings for two State Aid sidewalk improvement projects. The Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk project was initiated by resident petition. The Normandale Road and Valley View Road Sidewalk project was initiated by Council. Both projects have engaged the residents of the affected properties. Feasibility reports have been completed and are attached for review prior to the public hearing. Staff suggests scheduling Public Hearings for both projects on August 2, 2010. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2010 -57 -- Interlachen- Boulevard Sidewalk Feasibility Report Normandale Road and Valley View Sidewalk Feasibility Report G :1Engineeringllmprovements\S104 W Rd fr Concord to Normandale to BentonMESIGNTEASIBILITY (All Pre- Designs)1PUBLIC HEARINGS\201007006_RR_S 104.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -57 SET PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 2, 2010, SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION FOR: INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD, IMPROVEMENT NO. S -106 NORMANDALE ROAD AND VALLEY VIEW ROAD, IMPROVEMENT NO. S -104 City of Edina NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 2nd day of August, 2010, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider sidewalk construction on Interlachen Boulevard, Improvement No. S- 106, and on Normandale Road and Valley View Road, Improvement No. S -104. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as. required by law. Dated: July 6, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 6, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 t{,91��rr1, owe 5t FEASIBILITY STUDY — S 104 �o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS NORMANDALE ROAD AND VALLEY VIEW ROAD — BENTON AVENUE TO CONCORD AVENUE JULY 6, 2010 LOCATION: The Normandale Road and Valley View Road Sidewalk Project runs along the east side of the Normandale Road and along the north side of Valley View Road from Benton Avenue south to Concord Avenue (Figure 1). t' • , , r7 SOUTHVIEW LN j r � 4 ,.�. I;T 1^ t `. BENTON A k `.i.`€ O s r7 , O IV 1 r� I � i� W 60TH ST 1 _ 'tip` = �!'�'� • �'°''� • C, Z O V I I Project Area Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No: 5104 Existing Bituminous Sidewalk Existing Concrete Sidewalk Proposed State -Aid Sidewalk Figure 1. Project Area Map 1 -4-E I Engtn r',U Dept o.dob,r. ZOOS Feasibility Study Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No. S -104 July 6, 2010 INITIATION & ISSUES: The City Council directed the Engineering Department to do a feasibility study c the proposed sidewalk along_ the Normandale Road and Valley View Road. The City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update indicates the need for a sidewalk along this section of roadway (Attachment A). This segment was also identified in the 2004 Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study, see (Attachment B). Staff Issues The following are existing features that were used in determining the feasibility of the project and are'addressed in this report: • Existing fences and walls • Existing trees and landscaping • Existing overhead utilities • Steep grass and paved slopes • Safety of residents and children • Location of sidewalk (boulevard vs. back of walk) • Side of roadway (north vs. south) • Defined school walking zone Resident Input On May 18, 2010 Staff sent a�letter to all 32 residents in. the corridor inviting them to an informational meeting to discuss the proposed sidewalk. The meeting wr held on June 2, 2010 and was attended by 10 residents representing properties. A short presentation (Attachment D) was followed by a question and answer period. The major issues that were brought up during the informational meeting were why the north side -of the road was chosen as the preferred alignment, why the desire for a boulevard style walk and concerns with impacts to landscaping. There have not been any written comments from residents to date. However, staff has met on site with four residents to explain the approximate location of the walk and hear resident concerns. Summaries of the on -site meetings can be found in Attachment F. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The road is approximately 34 -feet wide and the right -of -way for the majority of the roadway is 70 -feet. The existing roadway is a bituminous surface with concrete curb. and gutter. A sidewalk extends along the east side of the Normandale Road from Normandale Elementary School to just south of the existing pedestrian cross walk at Benton Avenue (Photo 1). Page 2 of 6 Feasibility Study Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No July 6, 2010 S -104 Photo 1. Lookina North on Normandale Road at Benton Avenue At this location the sidewalk ends and an undulating grassy boulevard extends south to the sweeping curve at Valley View Road. The boulevard extending to Concord Avenue has sporadic landscaping and overhead utility lines (Photo 2). Photo 2 Existing Landscaping 4712 Valley View Rd Page 3 of 6 Feasibility Study Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No. S -104 July 6, 2010 At Concord Avenue there is a pedestrian activated flashing cross walk to cros- Valley View Road (Photo 3). The five foot concrete sidewalk east of Conco Avenue is located directly on the back of the curb on the south side of Valley View up to Wooddale Avenue. Photo 3. Intersection of Valley View Road and Concord Avenue The project area borders the walking zone of both Concord and Normandale Elementary School and South View Middle School (Figure 1). Traffic volumes collected on Normandale Road during May of 2009 shows an average daily traffic of 5,612 vehicles with an 85 percentile speed of 35.9 mph. The volume on Valley View Road east of Concord Avenue is 6,329 vehicles a day with an 85 percentile speed 34.6 mph. The City advocates separating vehicles and pedestrians when traffic volumes exceed 750 cars per day. Both sides of Normandale Road and Valley View Road were analyzed to determine the most appropriate and cost effective location to construct a sidewalk. West Side of Normandale /South Side of Valley View The west side of Normandale Road has only about 6 feet of right of way between the existing road and the chain -link fence separating Highway 100. As the road turns east and becomes Valley View Road the right of way increases to just over 10 feet. However there are number of large diameter oak and maple trees along with a number of retaining walls located directly in the middle of this boulevard. Page 4 of 6 Feasibility Study Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No. S -104 July 6, 2010 East Side of Normandale /North Side of Valley View The east side of Normandale Road has over sixty foot of right of way of mostly mowed area. As the road turns east and becomes Valley View Road the right of way decreases to about 15 feet. There are three locations with landscaping or trees located within the right of way that would be impacted (4712, 4716 and 4812 Valley View Rd) and one resident with a stone retaining wall. This is also the side of the road where the overhead utility lines are placed. Most of the utility poles are between 3 and 4 feet from the back of the curb. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: Sidewalk Style A 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk was selected as the minimum width needed for plowing by Public Works. A 5 -foot grass boulevard will separate the existing curb from the proposed sidewalk (Photo 4). The separation from the vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian friendly environment and allows the utility poles to remain in place. Photo 4. Boulevard Style Sidewalk Location of Sidewalk The east side of Normandale /north side of Valley View Road was selected as the preferred alignment based on the available right of way and to minimize the impacts to the large trees. This sidewalk will connect up to the existing walk at Benton Avenue on the north end and utilize the pedestrian flasher crossing at Concord Avenue. Grade issues will be resolved with lannon stone retaining walls and perennial gardens and fences will be moved out of the right of way. There are a couple of properties with substantial vegetation planted within the right -of -way. These homeowners will be given an opportunity to transplant these areas at their cost. Page 5 of 6 Feasibility Study Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No. S -104 July 6, 2010 - _" The location of the.new sidewalk will not allow a replanting of these areas; the boulevard is proposed to be planted-with a chloride tolerant sod. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: This project utilizes the existing City owned strip of right of way that runs parallel to the Normandale Road and Valley View Road from Benton Avenue to Concord Avenue. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. MAINTENANCE OF SIDEWALK: Per City Council policy the Edina Public Works Department will maintain a school zone sidewalk, including snow removal. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $200,000. The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. Funding for the project will come from Municipal State Aid funds since the Normandale Road and Valley View Road are both State Aid Roads. ASSESSMENTS: This project is funded through the distribution of the state gas tax; therefore there is NO special assessment'to property owners. PROJECT SCHEDULE:. The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Informational Meeting /Open House ........... ...........................June 2, 2010 Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing ........................July 6, 2010 'Public Hearing ........ ...........................:... .........................August 2, 2C Bid Opening .......... ............................... .......................:Winter 2010/. . Award Contract .....:..:..............: ........... ........................... Winter2010 /11 Begin Construction :.............. ............................... Spring /Summer 2011 Complete Construction .......................... .................Spring /Summer 2011 FEASIBILITY: The City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update has laid out a plan for future sidewalks and the proposed sidewalk along Normandale Road and Valley View Road is consistent with that Plan. This project will extend the sidewalk along Valley View Road completing a missing link in the regional network and add to the sidewalk network around the schools and community center. Staff believes the construction of this project is cost effective and feasible to create a safe pedestrian link along Normandale Road and Valley View Road. ATTACHMENTS: A. Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.10-2008 Comprehensive Plan Update B. Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study (2004) C. - Resident Letter #1 — Informational Meeting Announcement D. Informational Meeting Power Point Presentation E. Informational Meeting Attendance List' F. On -site meeting summaries Page 6 of 6 ac� sue �v-� /A '/I w91A,I o� Pi ay MUNICIPAL STATE AID SIDEWALK STUDY • "�roa^�• CITY OF EDINA Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 27, 2004) PURPOSE: This report analyzes the adopted City of Edina Pedestrian / Bicycle Facilities, the existing Municipal State Aid (MSA) Sidewalk System, the missing MSA sidewalk segments, and proposed construction of the missing sidewalk segments. HISTORY: The City of Edina currently has over 32 miles of MSA and County State Aid Highway (CSAH) sidewalks. Many of the sidewalks and pathways in the City were constructed with adjacent developments and are missing critical sidewalk segments. The Edina City Council requested staff to analyze the missing segments along the MSA and CSAH roadways. The Comprehensive Sidewalk / Pathway Plan was updated in 1999 as part of the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan update, see plan below. This plan includes all existing sidewalks along with proposed MSA/CSAH sidewalks and also proposed local roadway sidewalks. niT9M. Tian Pedestrian /Bi March 1499 le Facilities a/ Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 27, 2004) Page 2 PROPOSED MSA SIDEWALKS: The proposed sidewalks provide safe pedestrian travel along roadways that cannot accommodate the mixing of pedestrian and vehicular movements. The proposed sidewalk system will add approximately 12 miles of sidewalks to the existing system. Many of these segments will require extensive boulevard work to construct the sidewalk or pathway; these sidewalks will also transverse many residential boulevards. The map below indicates the existing system and proposed MSA/CSAH sidewalks. City of Edina Missing Municipal State Aid Sidewalks Fll ... i \ e A. C NN, E%ISUrq B[LrrMws Slrkwk •.••� PrppDW StaWAIE Sidewalk WtE Q - alsti g Camrete Sidewalk MuNCipal State Aid SteA E Istlrq Park Pathway January, 7004 Figure 2• MISSING MUNICIPAL SIDEWALK SEGMENTS Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 27, 2004) Page 3 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: A portion of the proposed sidewalk system can be constructed with programmed roadway projects as listed in the adopted 2004 -2008 Capital improvement Program (CIP), see Figure 3 below. The City's adopted Sidewalk Financing Policy requires initiation of sidewalks to be resident petition driven. However, the City Council may want staff to plan construction on some of the MSA/CSAH segments prior to receiving petitions. City of Edina Proposed Municipal State Aid Sidewalks Programmed in Capital Improvement Program Figure 3: PROGRAMMED MSA SIDEWALKS 3y Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 27, 2004) Page 4 COSTS & FEASIBLITY: Staff has prepared a draft CIP for the non- programmed segments of the MSA/CSAH sidewalk system; see attached CIP. Average costs to construct all . of the proposed MSA sidewalks is approximately $928,000 per year for the next six years; with the current level of MSA funding this is not feasible. The current CIP appropriates $110,000 to $ 50,000 a year for MSA sidewalks. 2004 -2008 MSA FUNDING: 2007* 2008 BE BALANCE 2,835,540 1,364,540 496,540 1,005,540 (367,460) YEAR EXPENDITURE 2,471,000 1,868,000 1,491;000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 BEGINNING BALANCE 2,835,540 11559,540 986,540 980,540 1,057,540 YEAR EXPENDITURE 2,276,000 1,573,000 1,006,000 923,000 1,100,000 ENDING BALANCE 559,540 (13,460)..' (19,460) 57,540 (42,460) MSA FUNDING WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALKS: 2004 - 2005 2006 2007* 2008 BE BALANCE 2,835,540 1,364,540 496,540 1,005,540 (367,460) YEAR EXPENDITURE 2,471,000 1,868,000 1,491;000 2,373,000 2,965,000 ENDING BALANCE. 364,540 (503,460) (994,460) (1,367,460) (3,332,460) *This includes the potential Federal funding under the Transportation Enhancement Program. This program is competitive and is administered by the, Metropolitan Council. City of Edina May 18, 2010 CAE: Proposed Sidewalk for Valley View Road — from Benton Avenue to Concord Avenue Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the planning phase for constructing a segment of sidewalk along the northeast side of Valley View Road from Benton Avenue to Concord Avenue in the school walking zone for Concord Elementary, Normandale Elementary and South View Middle Schools. Please see the attached map for a more detailed location. You are invited to attend'an informational meeting on June 2, 7 -8 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, to learn more about the proposed sidewalk and to provide us'with your feedback. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation starting shortly after 7 p.m. covering such topics as work to be done and preliminary project costs followed by-a question and answer session. If you cannot attend the meeting the presentation can be made available to you after the meeting. Please contact the Engineering Department at 952- 826 -0371. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, P.E. Assistant City Engineer GAEngineeringUrnprovements \S104 VV Rd fr Concord to Normandale to Benton\DESIGN\INFORMATIONAL IvfEETING\201005 I8_SI04 Neighborhood _Informatioal_Meeting_Letter.doc City Hall 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 School "rte i11 �r-�r d �r Walking Zone _ L :SOUTHVIEW LN _ W 58TH ST � a f z BENTON AV �i r 11 w Q ^ a- p ° a � 6 W 60TH ST _ > ' O `+r .^ k Z t. .y (� to ' �» • ., Project Area Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No: S104 Existing Bituminous Sidewalk Existing Concrete Sidewalk Proposed State -Aid Sidewalk C a�� �a N W +E s Engineering Dept October. 2009 S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION City of Edina June 2, 2010 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Valley View Road Sidewalk From Benton Avenue to Concord Avenue S -104 ':: CITY OF EDINA Input Opportunities PURPOSE OF MEETING IS TO INFORM AND TO GATHER PUBLIC INPUT FROM YOU - Use Post -it notes and place on map - Fill out comment cards - Tell us /Phone us - Write /Email us - Speak at Public Hearing 6/02/2010 Attachment D S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION ofCITY OF EDINA Introductions Typical Project Process Project -Plans -Costs/Funding -Maintenance Project Schedule :: CITY OF EDINA Agenda Typical Process • Initiation of improvement project by Council. -Neighborhood Meeting to inform residents of project and to take comments and input. • Ten days notice is sent to affected property owners and legal notice is placed in paper (Edina Sun) prior to Public Hearing. • Feasibility Report prepared and accepted by Council. • Conduct Public Hearing to order the project. 6/02/2010 Attachment D S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION . CITY OF EDINA Project Area 01: CITY OF EDINA Q Ee•yy BV.nrcu�,SMS of e.._.': — Eaewg Caves Bu+. ' — Repawa $11M VB Stlewk� Existing Pedestrian crossings Existing Conditions • Lack of conductivity 6/02/2010 Attachment D A S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING 6/02/2010 POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Attachment D 5 CITY OF EDINA Existing Conditions Hr� 0 CITY OF EDINA • Landscaping • Driveways • Trees w' Y I- Existing Conditions r 1 S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING 6/02/2010 POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Attachment D CITY OF EDINA Project Issues Issues /concerns we do know about: • Trees • Driveways • Landscaping • Grades • Utility poles Issues /concerns we don't know about? • Please forward comments to us. Let us know. CITY OF EDINA Construct a 5' wide concrete sidewalk along North /East side of Valley View Road. • Five foot grassy boulevard. Boulevard may vary to avoid trees, landscaping and existing structures. Project Scope S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING 6/02/2010 POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Attachment D CITY OF EDINA WIN • Walking zone for of both elementa schools and Sou View Middle School 6 S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING 6/02/2010 POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Attachment D Funding and Maintenance Fundinq `G • Funding will come from the State Gas Tax Fund. • Walk will NOT be assessed to the residents. Maintenance • The City will be responsible for maintaining the concrete walk. (a: CITY OF EDINA Proiect Schedule • Informational Meeting .......................June 2, 2010 • Tentative Council Orders Public Hearing .............. ...........................June 15, 2010 • Tentative Feasibility Report/Public Hearing ......................... ...........................July 6, 2010 • Bid Opening ......... .........................Summer 2010 • Award Contract .... .........................Summer 2010 • Begin Construction . .........................Summer 2010 • Complete Construction ...........................Fall 2010 7 S -104 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION :: CITY OF EDINA Questions? Comments? 6/02/2010 Attachment D VALLEY VIEW SIDEWALK S -104 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING June 2, 2010 �c 04-ej� �- - -- ADDRESS ©�• 1 , VAM �Elm U IR I'® II� I® 0 aea Project Number: S -104 Telephone No.: Person Contacted Organization: Location: Project Name: Subject: AF��Gweu� F Date: 8 -Jun -10 ❑ AM ❑INCOMING Time: 4.00 XD PM ❑OUTGOING Payton Robb Resident, 4812 Valley View Road Valley View Sidewalk Sidewalk Impact Recorded By: J. Sullivan SUMMARY OF CONVERSATION (including any decisions made and action agreed to) On site meeting with Payton Robb to discuss proposed sidewalk: Concerned with: • The impacts a 5 ft blvd and 5 ft walk would have on his spruce trees • Also concerned that tree branches would have to be trimmed to facility walk which would allow headlights from vehicles on Ryan Avenue. Date: 11-Jun-10 ❑ AM ❑INCOMING Time: 4.00 M PM ❑OUTGOING Person Contacted: Tom Peppers Organization: Resident Location: 4804 Valley View Project Name: Valley View Sidewalk F a/3 Subject: Sidewalk Impact Recorded By: J. Sullivan SUMMARY OF CONVERSATION (including any decisions made and action agreed to) On site meeting with Tom Peppers to discuss proposed sidewalk. Concerned with: The need to trim branches on his blue spruce tree next.to his driveway. While on site Brenda Liddle at 4808 Valley View and Bill Manners at 4712 Valley View stopped to ask questions on the location of the sidewalk. Ms. Liddle asked if the sidewalk could be placed at the back of the curb.. Mr. Manners wanted to meet on his yard to discuss his landscaping. I suggested he call to set up a time to meet. e 4 tit U) 0 Wee Project Number: S-104 Telephone No.: Date: 11-Jun-10 ❑ AM ❑INCOMING Time: 4.00 M PM ❑OUTGOING Person Contacted: Tom Peppers Organization: Resident Location: 4804 Valley View Project Name: Valley View Sidewalk F a/3 Subject: Sidewalk Impact Recorded By: J. Sullivan SUMMARY OF CONVERSATION (including any decisions made and action agreed to) On site meeting with Tom Peppers to discuss proposed sidewalk. Concerned with: The need to trim branches on his blue spruce tree next.to his driveway. While on site Brenda Liddle at 4808 Valley View and Bill Manners at 4712 Valley View stopped to ask questions on the location of the sidewalk. Ms. Liddle asked if the sidewalk could be placed at the back of the curb.. Mr. Manners wanted to meet on his yard to discuss his landscaping. I suggested he call to set up a time to meet. e - Project Number: S -104 Date: 25- Jun -10 L& AM r-1 INCOMING Telephone No.: 612- 810 -0081 Time: 9.00 ❑ PM ❑OUTGOING Person Contacted: 'Bill Manners Organization: Resident muutl - -r Rev'dI Copy Location: 4712 Valley View Project Name: Valley View Sidewalk Subject: Sidewalk Impact Recorded By: J. Sullivan SUMMARY OF CONVERSATION (including any decisions made and action agreed to) On site meeting with Bill Manners and Carol Cameron to discuss proposed sidewalk. Concerned with: * Selection of the north side,.when most residents are to the. south * 5' walk and 5' blvd will be too impactful to their property * How will the city replace their landscaping * Can they get a modified retaining wall design using a large slap type rock Instead of the City standard of the lannon stone? A, "o, j�h FEASIBILITY STUDY — S 106 ow9e 0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT v A a • ��AiOM�` CITY OF EDINA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD — BEDFORD AVENUE AND WILLIAM AVENUE JULY 6, 2010 LOCATION: The Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk is proposed along the south side of Interlachen Boulevard between Bedford Avenue and William Avenue (Figure 1). 5220 6216 4548 5324 5304 5300 6238 5234 5232 6224 Y' HOLLYWOOD RD 1 i 5241 5237 6233 5229 6306 S1D1 6221 621 6309 LJ ■ •Jt 4817 ti 4818 > 5319 W : 4821 0 6230 6224 5220 - Z - 5324 5320 >� . 5316 5312. • 6240 6236 INTERLACHEN BLVD 53T3 5000 500153335329 6321'" 5305 6000 5237' 5233 52255221 6215 5005 5013 8012 C 5013 6Q11 013 j 5 5012 Q i" � W Q 6013 6017 Ott Q � 6013 5016 5017 b016y Q �50T/ 6016 C OLL 5020 1 6021 Z C � 5021 4020 5p2p 5021 , X i � ! 024 m 5025 6024 60Ar" 5024 Y 5026 Q 9 5028 5028 5029 5028 S 6029 5032^�; 5033 5032 , -. 460 32 5033 5052 5033 6036 5037 5038 g 5037 5036 5037 6036 5037 5041 �0 50.40 5041 5040 6040 6046 5045 - X 5045 5044 5041 44 5224 60.19 I" 6100. 6101 w0 5101 5100 1 6101 -. 51 0' 6116 5104 10! _ 6104 5105 6104 Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Project Area Improvement No: S106 Proposed Sidewalk e • " "••• -� Existing Sidewalk E„pro.reoap. Am. 2m6 Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement No. S -106 July 6, 2010 INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition accepted by the City of Edina o September 8, 2009 (Attachment A). The petition was signed by 2 of the affected properties and one other resident living in the surrounding neighborhood. This section of sidewalk is not included in the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (Attachment B). However, this segment of sidewalk was included in the 2004 Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study (Attachment C). Given the proximity of this residential neighborhood to Grandview Business District and Todd Park, staff believes there is a need for sidewalk. Staff Issues The following are existing features that were used in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Existing trees, fencing and landscaping • Existing overhead utilities • Sloping yards and driveways • Safety of residents Resident Input Due to the small number of affected parcels and open house was not held. Instead, staff sent letters to the property owners on May 24, 2010 informing them of the project and asked to meet on site to discuss the proposal (Attachment D). At this time, only one resident requested to meet on site and only one othp� resident has commented on the project in writing (Attachment E). EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing 32 -foot wide roadway is bituminous with a designated 4 -foot bike lane. The right -of -way is approximately 66 -feet wide. There is approximately 17- feet of landscaped boulevard along the south side of Interlachen Boulevard and utility poles (Photo 1). Photo 1 Existing Landscaping and Fence Page 2 of 5 Feasibility Study Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement No. S -106 July 6, 2010 There currently is a sidewalk on Vandervork Avenue on the north side of Interlachen Boulevard. The sidewalk on Vandervork Avenue runs north and south between Interlachen Boulevard and Hollywood Road (Photo 2). Photo 2 Looking North on Vandervork Avenue Sidewalk Connection Interlachen Boulevard is signed and striped for designated bike lanes through this section. Traffic volumes collected on Interlachen Boulevard in 2009 shows an average daily traffic of 9,405 vehicles with an 85 percentile speed of 34.2 mph. The City advocates separating vehicles and pedestrians when traffic volumes exceed 750 cars per day. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: A 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk was selected as the minimum width needed for plowing by Public Works. A 5 -foot grass boulevard will separate the existing curb from the proposed sidewalk (Photo 3). The separation from the vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian friendly environment and allows the utility poles to remain in place. Currently there is bituminous curb and the sidewalk will be constructed with little disturbance to the existing bituminous curb. Page 3 of 5 Feasibility Study Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement No. S -106 July 6, 2010 Photo 3. Boulevard Style Sidewalk Along Interlachen Boulevard there is a decorative fence (Photo 1) that will need to be relocated. Also, some minor impacts to existing landscaping (Pho+- 4) that will be restored once the sidewalk gets constructed. Photo 4. Existing Landscaping A painted pedestrian crossing would also be installed at the extension of t Vandervork Avenue sidewalk to connect the two sidewalks. Page 4 of 5 0 Feasibility Study Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement No. S -106 July 6, 2010 RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: This project utilizes the existing City owned right -of -way. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. MAINTENANCE OF SIDEWALK: Per City Council policy the 'Edina Public Works Department will maintain and remove snow from the sidewalk. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $85,000. The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. Funding for the project will come from Municipal State Aid funds. ASSESSMENTS: This project is funded through the distribution of the state gas tax; therefore there is NO special assessment to property owners. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: FEASIBILITY: ATTACHMENTS:, Project Letter ........................................................... ....... May 24, 2010 Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing ........................ July 6, 2010 Public Hearin ............................................................ ........................ .......................August 2, 2010 g " "'�������'����� � .Winter 2010/11 Bid Opening Award Contract ...... ............................... ............:............Winter 2010/11 Begin Construction ...................... I ........ ...:..:....:..,....,..Spring /Summer 2011 Complete Construction ................. .........................Spring /Summer 2011 Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible along Interlachen Boulevard. • A. Resident Petition B. Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.10.- 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update'. C. Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study (2004) D. Resident Letter #1 E. On -site meeting summary and resident correspondence Page 5 of 5 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50`h Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 v• 4 �� g (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE REGE {VED: ❑ WATER -MAW ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. OF % L ACI-P6N �U �between�- L%:�' and w tVL 1 vu-& A' t LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS hPt,LVP.P.n and _. LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) - .. .- MAP. L WA 20407A& e S circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2001 PROCESS: All proposed sidewalks must be "petitioned for" by City of Edina Residents. Process for petitioning: 1. Submit Signed Petition to City Clerk, Clerk forwards to City Council 2. Council refers petition to Engineering Department for Feasibility Study 3. Engineering Department surveys area and prepares costs. 4. Neighborhood Information Meeting is held. 5. Engineering Department completes Feasibility Study. 6. Public Hearing is held - residents notified per State Law. 7. City Council hears proposed project and decides on issue - residents can speak publicly.(on record) regarding project. 8. if City Council orders project: G Construction documents drafted and publicly bid 6 Council Awards Bid ® Construction starts 9. Final Assessment Hearing is held after project completion. Typical process from start to finish is approximately one to two years. WHY SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks are recommended for roadways that experience higher volumes of traffic, typically around 750 vehicles per day or more. Volumes of vehicles on local streets are increasing Metro wide. These increases are due to a number of factors such as more vehicles per home, more services requested per home (remodelers, garbage trucks, recycling, grocery delivery, diaper delivery...); these trips average 12 to 14 trips per The average trips per day in 1975 averaged about 8 to 10. Typical traffic control devices such as stop signs will not reduce the volume of vehicles on a roadway. In fact placement of stop signs will increase mid -block vehicle speed. LOCATION: Sidewalks can be located either along the edge of a roadway or as a boulevard style sidewalk. The City recommends a boulevard style sidewalk due to increased safety of pedestrians. However, geometric limitations may force a sidewalk to be placed along the edge of a roadway. Sidewalks are typically five feet wide; four feet wide is acceptable for boulevard style sidewalks. Construction of sidewalks may include relocating smaller shrubs and trees, sprinkler systems, fences, etc.; these would be relocated as part of the project cost of the sidewalk. FUNDING: t` �afk efees --fir - .the�affected=r�sidet - t Sro�agh .S coal . Sidewalks along collector streets and County roads are funded through the State Gas -Tax funds. MAINTENANCE Local sidewalks are maintained by the property owners. Sidewalks along collector streets and County roads are maintained by the City of Edina (includes snow removal). <—Boulevardl SWe Edge of Roa 4 e h 4/ .13 iviEip F -J LL LpU.L 1 a.;U; A h- t-��(� �2 �v� ! [/ j'a.e (- 48 ^7 4 S(( t 4816. 'E 4821 5230 5224 i 5324 5320 c4 . 5116 5372 I `5328 5240 PJTERf -AQFd &L /O 7. 5313 @d,F 1. � P 5333 5329 5321 5305 5000 5005 5012 5013 5012 5016 5017' 5016 5020 LL 5021 5020 5024 5025 5024 5028 5028 5029 5031 5032 5036 5037 5036 5041 5040 - - 1. f -- -- — -- 5237 5233 5225 5221 5013 5012 5017 5016 5021 5024 sozs 5029 5028 5033 5032 5037 5936 5040 R y z �1s�ar��1 x-�hSUS Ca�f:3'T.iCi LO'u'S ^.S'tl _ __ ..511 5 C� �l http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS _ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed. LOGISMap_OV &Clien Vers1on =4.0 &Form... 8/10/2005 C O 4 o \q 4Y 04 C a 4 O os LEGEND: Existing Proposed School / Proposed Note: Park Pathways are included on Figure 7.11 Sidewalk Business Sidewalk State -Aid Sidewalk 1TA 4( °e '' s City of Edina r }� 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.10 �9t A, ll� jI k e '2, O En o MUNICIPAL STATE AID SIDEWALK STUDY •,tiaRroa�° CITY OF EDINA municipai State Aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 279 2 '04) PURPOSE: This report analyzes the adopted City of Edina Pedestrian / Bicycle Facilities, the existing Municipal State Aid (MSA) Sidewalk System, the missing MSA sidewalk segments, and proposed construction of the missing sidewalk segments. HISTORY. The City of Edina currently has over 32 miles of MSA and County State Aid Highway (CSAH) sidewalks. Many of the sidewalks and pathways in the City were constructed with adjacent developments and are missing critical sidewalk segments. The Edina City Council requested staff to analyze the missing segments along the MSA and CSAH roadways. The Comprehensive Sidewalk / Pathway Plan was updated in 1999 as part of the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan update, see plan below. This plan includes all existing sidewalks along with proposed MSA/CSAH sidewalks and also proposed local roadway sidewalks. of Edina tion Plan 1U 1099 Pedestrian /Bicycle racilities Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 27, 200,4) Page 2 PROPOSED MSA SIDEWALKS: The proposed sidewalks provide safe pedestrian travel along roadways that cannot accommodate the mixing of pedestrian and vehicular movements. The proposed sidewalk system will add approximately 12 miles of sidewalks to the existing system. Many of these segments will require extensive boulevard work to construct the sidewalk or pathway-, these sidewalks will also transverse many residential boulevards. The map below indicates the existing system and proposed MSA/CSAH sidewalks. City of Edina Missing Municipal State Aid Sidewal TTl I T �..�:... 1 , IU I L' — i L 1 J i9 c 0.1 l- j �� r• N w�E U.nuwy, 7001 Figure 2• MISSING MUNICIPAL SIDEWALK SEGMENTS ^ EiI50np Btum s Suf k Proposeo Sl WA10 SIWe ik — 6usnn0 Co—Oe Skfe"k MU-1P- Slate AM Strew _— Eslsbng Park Pathway l- j �� r• N w�E U.nuwy, 7001 Figure 2• MISSING MUNICIPAL SIDEWALK SEGMENTS A 4A ` Municipal State aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 27, 2004) Page 3 (PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: A portion of the proposed sidewalk system can be constructed with programmed roadway projects as listed in the adopted 2004 -2008 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), see Figure 3 below. The City's adopted Sidewalk Financing Policy requires initiation of sidewalks to be resident petition driven. However, the City Council may want staff to plan construction on some of the KISA/CSAH segments prior to receiving petitions. City of Edina Proposed Municipal State Aid Sidewalks Programmed in Capital Improvement Program r, J. ^Y +, r- a 61 ,' 7 � 7 Figure 3• PROGRAMMED MSA SIDEWALKS W +E E1 glr 1 eJrro g Dept gal ury, 1DD! T•p101610.1•19161 OF Frw....CV... — CGD96Dinh-Sol-, 2m: — LrbPC- ,-11 —K 3=f> _- acagPa[: no uay � ___. Pmp:Gttl SOk- N�SYEmaC � 1111 t(HISTik Atl ST<et � Figure 3• PROGRAMMED MSA SIDEWALKS W +E E1 glr 1 eJrro g Dept gal ury, 1DD! I#Iteur�Icupal State Aid Sidewalk Study February 14, 2003 (Revised January 27, 2004 Page 4 COSTS & FEASIBUTY: Staff has prepared a draft CIP for the non - programmed segments of the M5A/CSAH sidewalk system; see attached CIP. Average costs to construct all of the proposed MSA sidewalks is approximately $928,000 per year for the next six years; with the current level of MSA funding this is not feasible. The current CIP appropriates $110,000 to $ 50,000 a year for MSA sidewalks. 2004 -2008 MSA FUNDING- 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 BEGINNING BALANCE 2,835,540 1,559,540 986,540 980,540 1,057,540 YEAR EXPENDITURE 2,276,000 1,573,000 1,006,000 923,000 1,100,000 ENDING BALANCE 559,540 (13,460) -(19,460) 57,540 (42,460) MSA FUNDING WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALKS: 2004 2005 2006 2007' 2008 BEGINNING BALANCE 2,835,540 1,364,540 496,540 1,005,540 (367,460) YEAR EXPENDITURE 2,471,000 1,868,000 1,491,000 2,373,000 2,965,000 ENDING BALANCE 364,540 (503,460) (994,460) (1,367,460) (3,332,460) =This includes the . potential Federal funding under the Transportation Enhancement Program. This program is competitive and is administered by the Metropolitan Council. ' is May 24, 2010 Mr. Curtin 5305 Interlachen Boulevard: Edina, Mfg 55436 RE: Petitioned Sidewalk along Interlachen Boulevard € e4l, ' ; E City of Edina Dear Resident, The City of Edina has initiated the planning phase for constructing a petitioned segment of sidewalk along,* the south side of Interlachen Boulevard from Bedford Avenue to Williams Avenue. This section of sidewalk is proposed to be funded using State Gas Tax dollars and will have no costs to the homeowner.. Please see the attached map for a more detailed location. I'd like to meet with you on' site to discuss ,the. proposed sidewalk design, location and potential impacts. Please contact me at 952- 826 -0445 to set up a time to meet. Regards, ack �DS u I I i v �a Assistant City Engineer Enclosure: Project Layout G: \Engineering \Improvements \5106 Interlachen Blvd fr Bedford to Williams Ave (Petitioned)\ADMIN\CORR \LET T ERS AND EMA I LS\ 20100524_5305_) nterl ach en_U pda te_l ei,er. doc City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET Fnin;A NAINNFSnTA.55424 -1394 Www.cityofedina.com 952- 927 -€861 FAX 952- 826 -0390 TTY 952- 826 -0379 G) m t0 CD CD 3 v 0 CD CD M r- m r=L o� o= A � d W � U ID CL � O d OCC l=D 1C � m m D m m aD o CL O Z n O m I m x D Z 0 LEGT+M teo.ot®ousw� asalffiMKrUhMKMClma&GEMM zlmT=rG m pQal mwLx8r RVANOM 1aGiTSND WrLow ffifl'QAATLa PULIXINARY arr a saw ,.- �t+w•�..yy.- .�.....e6- . , .... r .,� ay�lfia.:rs�'r�'!r'.M+;+brw �'��IST'f 'F' O lk W�'J) Ulm— L- r r, + CITY OF EDINA PROPOSFU _SIDEWALK_DLPRQVEMEN'1'S 5000 f y r ' vd�y WT 1 ^ 1 S P May 24, 2010 City of Edina Mr. & [ors. Lantto 5000 Williams Avenue Edina, MN 55436 RE: Petitioned Sidewalk along Interlachen Boulevard Dear Resident, The Cityof Edina has initiated the planning phase for constructing a petitioned.segment of sidewalk along the south side of Interlachen Boulevard from Bedford Avenue to Williams Avenue'. This section of sidewalk is proposed to.'be funded using State Gas Tax dollars and will have no costs to the homeowner. Please see the attached map for a more detailed location. I'd like to meet with you on site to discuss the proposed sidewalk design, location and potential impacts. Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0445 to setup a time to meet., .Regards, Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer Enclosure: Project .Layout G:\Engineering\lmprovements\SID6 Interlachen Blvd fr Bedf6rd to Williams Ave (Petitioned)\ADMIN \CORR\LETTERS AND EMAILS\20100524 5000- Williams_Update_letter.doc City ria[9 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55 424-1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 -927 -8361 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 ti m 7 f0, CD T. 7 10 3 V O 3 cD r mm �g r r^p � n d omr om o= A � n U, =p ion a 56 d O m = c3 d < co m m v CD ct. no 0 = n N s O Z n O I m z z 0 a -- 1_J I.�.i Lo LHUMM !➢O!� ® &�V7AIY _ - _ _ _ _ ■�rnaam�vem+aabc�sswrrms BmTiNGPOWmtPOIjLl67JMUE U PROPOMP GRAINY SLVU — — LOTLXW — — V=frCPFATLUV1 ISA i O o - ,r *k - _ - PULIMAMARY a" v LNI CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS "5000 M 5 r' ki �I � O May 24, 2010 City of Edina Ms. Sandra Strom 5313 Interlachen Boulevard Edina, MN 55436 RE: Petitioned Sidewalk along Interlachen Boulevard Dear Resident, The City of Edina has initiated the planning phase for constructing a petitioned segment of sidewalk along the south side of Interlachen Boulevard from Bedford Avenue to Williams Avenue. This section of sidewalk is proposed to be funded using State Gas Tax dollars and will have no costs' to the homeowner. Please see the attached map for a more detailed location. I'd like to meet with you on site to discuss the proposed sidewalk design, location and potential impacts. Please contact me at 952- 826 -0445 to set up a time to meet. Regards, Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer Enclosure Project Layout G: \Engineering \Improvements \5106 Interlachen Blvd fr Bedford to Williams Ave (Petitioned)\ADIJIIN\CORR\LET ERS AND EMiAILS\ 20100524_5313_1 nterlachen_U pdate_letter.doc City Gall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET www.cityofedina.com EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 ti m ro CD CD 3 v 0 4 CD CD 7 mrn d o� A � I� d w co ul m I a 56 �n ds CD(D IC 3 v m w Im m m � ,c Qo O Z z n O m D z 0 LEGEND PRo.oSIDSaKrALK — — — — — a�m�omw�miowctsasaur� P!!SLlYINAJlY — -- - a,ncr;r ip •ern CCU u - VXMMNarosRLraant Tz [� riooewmausrtw ary w xm .,1••__,._ ,r.om — — — azaa�w�rtua �'.... � :..... .�.. .r. .. - -y,.. Bey.:• +.�.'^` ... .. ...... y � ._ ... - � ke ......� w+r. �� . tw � ��� , � ., Y � •' . Syr . . ,,• � � I � i 111 - i •5313 53� ?HOC .` CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED SIDEWALK IMPRUYE�tE[iTS GT (iCIA_ilV' li'l't 4Ji: U :1 .r 17• : .4a S n Sandra K. Strom 5313 Interlachen Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 June 2, 2010 Certified Mail #7009 2820 0004 0852 2340 Return Receipt Requested Mr. Jack D. Sullivan City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Sidewalk on Interlachen Blvd. from Bedford to Williams Avenue Dear Mr. Sullivan: I question the necessity of construction of a sidewalk on Interlachen Blvd. between Bedford and Williams Avenue. I do not believe the full ramifications had been explored. 1. One, single, block of sidewalk on the residential section of Interlachen Blvd. does not seem to benefit the entire neighborhood nor the City of Edina. Very few people walk on Interlachen Blvd., let alone cross Interlachen Blvd. to go down Vandenvork from Bedford or Williams. It is not difficult walking across Interlachen Blvd. without a sidewalk. 2. I am sure the State Gas Tax dollars could be better spent on the repairs of the side streets, alleys, and other public areas that would benefit all of Edina and not just a few individuals. I believe this is a misappropriation of funds for the benefit of a few Edina residents. 3. The cost would be prohibitive for Edina to have to maintain the single sidewalk, especially during the winter for snow removal. 4. One block of sidewalk on the residential section of Interlachen Blvd. would appear to be out of place. It would change the appearance of the entire boulevard. The entire residential area of Interlachen Blvd. should either have no sidewalks or all sidewalks on both sides of the boulevard. 5. The placement of the sidewalk would be inconsistent with the sidewalk located in front of the Holiday Gas Station on Interlachen Blvd. This sidewalk is place along side the curb.. 6. I never signed a petition to construct a sidewalk on Interlachen Blvd. and believe all of the residents on the block concerned should have consented to it. Page 2 Sandra K. Strom 5313 Interlachen Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 The fence and bushes on my property were placed approximately eight feet from the curb, which was according to the ordinances at the time of installation many years ago. Now, you show that they would have to be removed. Is the relocation of these items included in your proposal at no cost to the homeowner too? 8. In the June 2, 2010 Star Tribune article by Mary Jane Smetanka, "Edina Residents Help Guide City on Redeveloping Neighborhood," it appears that the issue was the city had not given a bigger public discussion about some open public property. After this was discussed with the city, it was decided to allow these citizen led groups to help shape the future of a neighborhood. I look at the side walk issue as one person's idea of self benefit which in its nature does not benefit the city of Edina and all of its citizens. For the record, I emphatically oppose the construction of the solitary sidewalk on Interlachen Blvd. between Bedford and Williams Avenues. It would be a misappropriation of funds to which would have very little benefit to all residents in the City of Edina. Therefore, it is not cost effective. Sincerely, Sandra K. Strom MEETING REPORT Project Number: S -106 Date: 11- Jun -10 ® AM ❑INCOMING Telephone No Person Contacted: Organization: Location: Project Name: Subject: 612 -1612 -203 -Time: 7.30 Ij PM MOUTGOING Mark Curtin Resident 5305 Interlachen Blvd Interinnhen Sidewalk Rev'dl Copy Sidewalk Impact Recorded By: J. Sullivan SUMMARY OF CONVERSATION (including any decisions made and action agreed to) On site meeting with Mark Curtin to discuss proposed sidewalk. Concerned with: • signage in his yard • impacts to driveway I stated the design would include placing a yellow pedestrian crossing sign at the east property line to line up with Vandervork Ave. The driveway would need to be reconstructed to facilitate the proper cross slope on the driveway. The city would coordinate this work as part of the sidewalk contract. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335606 6/17/2010 118636 A & B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 177.38 BEARINGS, SLIP RING 00005860 238221 57396 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 177.38 336607 6/17/2010 100612 A.M. LEONARD 293.99 PLANTERS 00002092 238331 C110065601 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.87 TUBS 00002092 238332 0110064881 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 339.86 336608 611712010 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 187.52 SOD 00001419 238222 33783 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 267.88 SOD 00001419 238223 33782 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 455.40 335609 6/17/2010 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 190.15 SOLENOID 00005644 238333 0125174 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 190.15 335610 611712010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 52.40 238290 0333228 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 55.20 238291 0806225 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 107.60 336611 611712010 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 68.97 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 238334 7433 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 258.70 SQUAD TEAR DOWN 238581 7344 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 327.67 335612 611712010 100068 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 37,683.00 RECYCLING 238163 2178963 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 37,683.00 335613 6117/2010 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page- 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE EQUIPMENT RECYCLING 894.22 COPIER PAPER 238456 10246040 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,218.37 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004199 238539 10245419 -00 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 2,266.79 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004199 238540 10245416 -00 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 5,379.38 335614 6/17/2010 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 1,409.54 FOOD 238335 1368479 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,409.54 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335616 6/17/2010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 133.76 COFFEE 238457 416527 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 133.76 336616 6117/2010 100266 AT &T MOBILITY 45.00 238336 870517029X06021 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 0 45.00 336617 611712010 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 65.00 SQUAD REPAIR 238337 3306 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 65.00 336618 6/1712010 105369 B & H PHOTO - VIDEO 7,477.75 HD MOBILE PRODUCTION CAMERA60004197 238164 43535697 2210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATIONS 7,477.75 335619 6/17/2010 124499 BACH, MARCIA 297.95 USTA WORKSHOP EXPENSES 238541 061210 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 297.95 335620 6117/2010 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 59.29 TOOLS 00005836 238542 018 - 204133 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.29 335621 6/1712010 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 532.02 BATTERIES 00005751 238224 2683 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.00- CREDIT 00005751 238338 7/419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.00- CREDIT 238339 7/415 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 266.08 BATTERIES 238458 595 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 307.89 BATTERIES 238459 2611 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 980.99 335622 6/1712010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 3,827.67 238292 53546500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 41.00 238293 53461900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,723.13 238294 53544900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 81.55 238295 53487100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 127.24 " 238296 83732900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 719.45 238395 53546400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 200.10 238396 53544800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,005.20 238598 53642100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG , LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,441.40 432.10 230.36 4.62- PO # Doc No 238599 238600 238601 238602 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Inv No Account No 53640600 5862.5513 53641900 5822.5512 83706700 5842.5515 83645000 5842.5515 - GENERAL 9,824.58 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1550.6406 335623 ` F 6/17/2010 1600.6406 108670. BERNER, JIM SUPPLIES 1600.6406 GENERAL s 1400.6513 150.00 PERFORMANCE.6 /29/10 GENERAL 238537 060110 150.00 336624 6/17/2010 100648: BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 58.48 LAMINATING POUCHES 238165 WO- 625593 -1 33.12 BACKREST, STAPLE REMOVER 238166 WO- 625516 -1 283.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238167 WO- 625835 -1 53.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238168 WO- 626048 -1 53.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238169 WO- 624191 -1 31.74 SIGNATURE STAMP 238225 IN -18791 16.20. OFFICE SUPPLIES 238460 W0-626418 -1 531.16 335626 61171201.0 126209 BISEK, KATIE { 52.50 " MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238593 061410 52.50 .335626- 119679i BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 34.34 TOILET SERVICE 00005843 238543 21007 - 94.34 TOILET SERVICE - 00005844 238544 21006 34.34 TOILET SERVICE 00005842 238545 21008 163.02 335627 6/17/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 11.73 COMPRESSED AIR 00005864 238461 60447 9.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238546 59316 21.36 335628 6/17/2010 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 105.50 238603 99594 105.50 335629 6/17/2010 100669, BOYER TRUCK PARTS 325.73 STARTER 00005642 238226 409934 325.73 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page- 3 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST.SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 5862.5513 1553.6530 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336630 6/1712010 101430 BROWNELLS INC. 60.02 WAGNER EQUIPMENT 238227 05982000.00 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page- 4 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.02 336631 6/17/2010 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6/22/10 238531 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 336632 611712010. 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 167.36 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 238228 21757 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 167.36 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 238228 21757 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 167.36 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 238228 21757 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 502.08 336633 6/17/2010 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 53,85 238297 10904 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,019.30 238298 10906 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 203.55 238299 10902 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,276.70 335634 6117/2010 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 107.09 UNIFORM PURCHASE 238229 060210 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 107.09 336636 6/17/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 736.00 238300 86551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 80.00 238397 86562 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 816.00 335636 611712010 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 11.17 238170 060210 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 22.86 238170 060210 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 46.22 238170 060210 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 55.26 238170 060210 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 55.26 238170 060210 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 73.32 238170 060210 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 170.91 238170 060210 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 217.52 238170 060210 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 228.61 238170 060210 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 395.11 238170 060210 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 433.74 238170 060210 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 437.31 613.26 723.80 1,388.00 336637 CITY OF EDINA 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6117/2010 8034001 -1 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 238170 060210 5111.6186 HEAT 238170 060210 1552.6186 HEAT 238170 060210 1646.6186 HEAT 238170 060210 5210.6186 HEAT 238170 060210 5911.6186 HEAT 238170 060210 5511.6186 HEAT 336637 6/1712010 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 110.03 8034001 -1 238587 8034001 -5/10 1552.6186 110.03 336638 6/1712010 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 39.23 238462 2001232 5311.6186 567.38 238463 2001222 1552.6186 867.22 238464 2000722 5620.6186 1,473.83 336639 6/17/2010 124784 CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTORS INC 52.65 LINKAGE, BUSHING, TUBE 00002075 238340 438389 5630.6530 52.65 336640 6117/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 251.95 238301 420083 5842.5514 140.99 238398 419843 5862.5514 392.94 336641 6/1712010 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/30/10 238538 060110 5631.6136 150.00 336642 6/17/2010 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 262.04 % STORM SEWER BILLING 00005690 238171 4458 5934.6185 262.04 336643 611712010 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.92 WINDOW CLEANING 238465 465314 5861.6180 16.49 WINDOW CLEANING 238465 465314 5821.6180 25.99 WINDOW CLEANING 238465 465314 5841.6180 57.40 336644 6/17' " -'0 114548 CIZEK, DARIN HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT REPAIR PARTS 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 5 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF DOME PROGRAM WELL PUMPS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING I POOL OPERATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION LIGHT 8 POWER CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 252.21 CONFERENCE LODGING 238230 060210 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 252.21 335646 6/1712010 120433 COMCAST 22.64 8772 10 614 0220686 238466 220686 -6/10 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 22.64 335646 6117/2010 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 2,324.66 CABLE TV ADS 238467 273112,113,114 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,324.67 CABLE TV ADS 238467 273112,113,114 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 2,324.67 CABLE TV ADS 238467 273112,113,114 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 6,974.00 336647 611712010 126594 COTTRELL, NANCY 85.00 JR GOLF REFUND 238547 061010 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES GOLF REVENUES 85.00 336648 6/17/2010 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF 428.57 SOD 00002094 238341 1906 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 428.57 335649 611712010 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,374.65 T- SHIRTS FOR RESALE 238468 6466 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 872.25 PENS FOR RESALE 238469 6464 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 841.12 CUPS FOR RESALE 238470 6612 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,088.02 336650 6/17/2010 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH 294.98 PRECAST SLAB 00005688 238172 S000020007 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 294.98 335661 6/17/2010 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 18.02 114 - 09855685 -4 WATER 238471 060110 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 18.02 336652 6/17/2010 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 1,290.96 METERS, GASKETS 00005683 238173 6490425 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 1,290.96 336663 6/17/2010 104020 DALCO 100.87 TISSUE 00005787 238231 2217486 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 761.10 TOWELS, LINERS, PUNCH 00005787 238232 2217124 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 336666 6117/2010 5421.5510 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD 6/15/2010 9:01:43 R55CKREG LOG20000 335.76 VEHICLE CHARGERS 238342 487827 25.03 238477 335.76 5821.6188 25.03 238477 336667 Council Check Register 5,963.64 Page - 7 335660 611712010 119851 DIEKMAN, BETHANY 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 238343 335295 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 78.06 377.71 GRILL CLEANER, BLEACH 00006343 238472 2219348 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL BAKERY 1,239.68 335750 333.65 335654 611712010 335668 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 4,340.50 761.90 238474 238399 6081035 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 770.00 335669 238400 6081036 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,531.90 336666 6/1712010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,293.98 238302 555279 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 59.20 238303 555280 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 22.40 238304 555278 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 43.00 238401 555275 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4.315.55 238402 555276 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 336666 6117/2010 5421.5510 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 335.76 VEHICLE CHARGERS 238342 487827 25.03 238477 335.76 5821.6188 25.03 238477 336667 6/17/2010 5,963.64 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 335660 611712010 119851 DIEKMAN, BETHANY 64.77 BAKERY 238343 335295 061410 1346.6406 143.11 BAKERY 238344 335389 78.06 BAKERY 238345 335497 47.71 BAKERY 238473 335750 333.65 335668 6/17/2010 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 4,340.50 MAY 2010 SURCHARGE 238474 9069053060 4,340.50 335669 6117/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1495.4380 SURCHARGE 5,767.12 238475 110311893 -5/10 5410.6122 121.44 238476 110311867 -5/10 5621.6122 25.02 238477 110312148 -5/10 5861.6188 25.03 238477 110312148 -5/10 5821.6188 25.03 238477 110312148 -5/10 5841.6188 5,963.64 335660 611712010 119851 DIEKMAN, BETHANY 384.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEANUP 238582 061410 1346.6406 384.00 ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL INSPECTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335661 6/17/2010 119860 DIEKMAN, MARLENE 462.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEANUP 238583 061410 1346.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 462.00 335662 6/17/2010 123162 DISH NETWORK 38.49 8255 70 708 1422839 238478 060410 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 38.49 335663 6/1712010 124289 DISTRIBUTOR SALES INC. 239.10 PLUMBING PARTS 00005605 238548 11799 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 239.10 335664 6/17/2010 122199 DOLL, MARTY 89.33 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 238549 061410 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 222.75 PARKING / MILEAGE 238549 061410 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 312.08 336665 6/1712010 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 238233 25852 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 238233 25852 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 683.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 238233 25852 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,050.00 336666 6/17/2010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 8,000.94 CHEMICALS 00001215 238479 82700734 -10 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 862.09 CHLORINE 238482 82700771 -10 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 8,863.03 336667 6/17/2010 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 282.33 LIGHTING PARTS 00005582 238550 07225500 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 139.50 TIMER, LAMPS 00005564 238551 07212801 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 421.83 335668 6/17/2010 106467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 4,710.00 ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 238234 060910 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 4,710.00 336669 6/17/2010 118010 EGAN, BILL 942.65 ANIMAL CONTROL 238483 060710 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 942.65 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335670 6/17/2010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 238346 60757 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,390.00 ARBITRAGE 2009A CIP 238347 60767 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 4,390.00 336671 6/1712010 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,381.75 MAY 2010 TRANSPORTS 238348 060810 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,381.75 336672 611712010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 42.02 FILTER ELEMENTS 00005750 238235 69- 012101 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.02 335673 6117/2010 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 229.03 VINYL LETTERING 00002084 238174 190 -38188 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 229.03 335674 6117/2010 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 159.79 BIKE SIGNS 00002091 238349 131200003889 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 159.79 33.5676 611712010 122077 FIELDS, DEBRA 5.11 PETTY CASH 238552 060710 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 17.15 PETTY CASH 238552 060710 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 26.34 PETTY CASH 238552 060710 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 48.60 335676 611712010 106420 FIKES SERVICES 41.25 AIR DEODORIZERS 238350 112918 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 41.25 336677 6/17/2010 104474 FILTERFRESH 232.45 COFFEE 00005882 238484 66601553 -2011 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 232.45 336678 6117/2010 104270 FLARE HEATING 8. AIR CONDITIONI 2,167.00 OFFICE AIR CONDITIONING 00002283 238485 0019667 -IN 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,520.00 FURNACE INSTALLATION 00005841 238553 0019658 -IN 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,687.00 336679 6117/2010 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 954.01 K9 EXAM 238237 364049 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/1712010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 954.01 335680 611712010 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 13.59 HOSE 00005107 238236 01P1480130 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 13.59 335681 6/1712010 100764 G & K SERVICES 84.91 238175 053110 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 156.24 238175 053110 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 166.14 238175 053110 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 252.12 238175 053110 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 429.77 238175 053110 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 464.95 238175 053110 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 572.00 238175 053110 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 2,126.13 335682 6/17/2010 100776 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 182.00 STAFF T- SHIRTS 238176 80383 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 182.00 336683 6/17/2010 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 133.57 PARTS 238351 053110 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,005.02 PARTS 238351 053110 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,138.59 336684 6/1712010 103186 GERTENS 299.38 PLANTS 238486 198953 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 299.38 335686 611712010 119936 GLOBAL OAK 18.75 FALL PARK & REC PROGRAMS 238554 010719 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 56.25 CHECK SALES TAX 238554 010719 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75.00 AQUATIC CTR E- COMMERCE 238554 010719 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75.00 SUPER 6 & 7 CHANGE 238554 010719 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112.50 AQUATIC CTR E- COMMERCE 238554 010719 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 168.75 HEALTHY HORNETS 238554 010719 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 206.25 SUMMER PARK 8 REC PROGRAMS 238554 010719 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 637.50 BGC LESSON REGISTRATION 238554 010719 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,006.25 WESSITE MAINTENANCE 238554 010719 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 3,356.25 336686 6/17/2010 100778 GOODIN COMPANY 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL-MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TENNIS INSTRUCTION RANGE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK SPECIAL ACTIVITIES POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL ACTIVITIES POOL ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL ACTIVITIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 6/17/2010 -6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 970.17 AIR VACUUM BREAKER 00005576 238238 01837815 -00 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 970.17 335687 6/17/2010 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,231.05 MAY 2010 SERVICE 00005686 238177 0050476 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,231.05 335688 6/17/2010 101103 GRAINGER 198.79 GLOVES 00005797 238239 9266658971 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.00 SUNSCREEN, GLOVES 00005791 238240 9265535667 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 160.76 SUNSCREEN, GLOVES 00005791 238240 9265535667 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 160.76 SUNSCREEN, GLOVES 00005791 238240 9265535667 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 160.78 SUNSCREEN, GLOVES 00005791 238240 9265535667 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 54.82 CARTRIDGES 00005804 238241 9267991264 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 4.46 FUSES 00005798 238242 9267070960 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 31.97 SAW BLADES 00005798 238242 9267070960 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 6.27 BATTERIES 00005803 238243 9267672492 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 11.36 BATTERIES 00005803 238243 9267672492 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17.63 BATTERIES 00005803 238243 9267672492 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 66.01 PAINT, CHIP PAINTBRUSH 00005807 238487 9268713238 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 157.30 TRIMMER LINE, BATTERIES 00006432 238488 9260815049 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 207.28 SPLICE KIT, FUSES 00006249 238489 9263897044 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 191.95 DISPOSABLE GLOVES 00005803 238555 9267672500 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,470.14 336689 6/17/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,124.25 238604 119580 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 122.25 238605 119638 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 423.00 238606 119215 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 423.00- 238607 119474 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 82.25 238608 119639 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,328.75 335690 6117/2010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 38.60 WASTE CANS 238352 061010 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 42.90 OAK PLANTER 238352 061010 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 81.50 335691 6/17/2010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 231.07 BULBS 00002096 238490 947960037 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 231.07 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/17/2010 — 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336692 611712010 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 PERFORMANCE 6/22/10 238529 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 250.00 335693 6117/2010 170.41 170.41 336694 6/1712010 241.50- 2,895.75 2,654.25 336695 6/17/2010 176,208.57 26,355.83 202,564.40 335696 6/1712010 295.01 295.01 335697 6/1712010 89.00 89.00 336698 611712010 32.00 560.00 1,638.80 156.00 2,386.80 336699 6/17/2010 796.74 796.74 335700 6/1712010 65.00 65.00 335701 6/17/2010 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS REGISTER TAPE 00007515 238353 269152 100797 HAWKINS INC. CREDIT 00001215 238591 3127358 CHEMICALS 238592 3107971 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS PREMIUM 238556 34969098 PREMIUM 238557 34968128 126692 HEARING HEALTH CLINIC HEARING AID STREAMER 238558 061110 101676 HEGGIES PIZZA PIZZA 238491 1704423 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION RADIO ADMIN FEE 238244 20058115 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00005863 238245 20058078 RADIO ADMIN FEE 238246 20058016 SILS /CAL SUPPORT 238247 21056225 101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI MAY 2010 BOOKING FEE 238248 3072 126591 HILL, AMY PSA EXPENSES 238559 061410 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 5421.5510 1460.6230 1553.6237 1400.6151 1400.6160 1195.6170 2210.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COURT CHARGES GENERAL SUPPLIES LEGAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15%2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.00 238305 524290 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 1,116.50 238403 524464 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.00 238404 524463 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,164.75 238405 524462 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 376.00 238609 524473 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,783.25 335702 611712010 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 252.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238178 060710 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 252.00 336703 611712010 100409 IN- CONTROL INC. 256.00 CHEMICAL FEED ADJUSTMENT 00005696 238249 10062DC01 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 256.00 335704 6117/2010 104167 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 337.00 CODE BOOKS 238560 1201239 -IN 1495.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS INSPECTIONS 337.00 335705 6/17/2010 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 58.55 ADAPTERS 00005861 238354 4277549-01 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 58.55 336706 6/17/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 231.95 238355 1399329 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,280.55 238406 1390381 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 301.66 238407 1396410 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 95.40 238610 1390387 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12,169.40 238611 1390386 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,023.05 238612 1390382 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20,102.01 335707 6/17/2010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 338.32 WEED KILLER 00005820 238179 54688911 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 338.32 335709 6/1712010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.12 238408 1849666 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 35.37 238409 1849681 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,761.98 238410 1849678 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 211.24 238411 1849675 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,941.10 238412 1849680 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 336710 611712010 Amount Supplier / Explanation 905.73 1.12 4,943.18 40.00 40.00 82.50- 1,630.04 533.22 514.73 31.37 1,793.84 396.03 99.12 2,231.03 3.36 4,408.07 2,478.31 22.11 1,712.68 183.36 2,010.76 1,583.28 33,878.63 104962 JONES, DENISE 16.09 OVERPAID POOL PASS 16.09 238594 061410 5301.4532 336711 6/17/2010 102824 KAY PARK -REC CORP. 4,640.00 PADDLEBOATS 00002031 238356 00146988 5630.6406 4,640.00 335712 6/17/2010 335713 6/1712010 100563 KEEHR, GREGORY 65.11 FLOWERS FOR PLANTERS 238357 060910 5841.6406 65.12 FLOWERS FOR PLANTERS 238357 060910 5861.6406 130.23 126696 KERR, CHRISTINE 101.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT- FINCH 238561 060910 1470.4329 101.00 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR SEASON TICKETS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE FEES 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 14 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF tDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 238413 1849676 5862.5513 238414 1849667 5862.5513 238415 1849679 5862.5513 238416 1844296 5862.5512 238417 1844295 5842.5512 238418 460727 5842.5513 238613 1849660 5822.5513 238614 1849659 5822.5513 238615 1849658 5822.5513 238616 1849663 5822.5515 238617 1849662 5822.5512 238618 1849661 5822.5512 238619 1849657 5822.5512 238620 1849677 5862.5513 238621 1849665 5842.5513 238622 1849673 5842.5513 238623 1849671 5842.5513 238624 1849670 5842.5513 238625 1849669 5842.5513 238626 1849664 5842.5513 238627 1849674 5842.5512 238628 1849672 5842.5512 238629 1849668 5842.5512 238594 061410 5301.4532 336711 6/17/2010 102824 KAY PARK -REC CORP. 4,640.00 PADDLEBOATS 00002031 238356 00146988 5630.6406 4,640.00 335712 6/17/2010 335713 6/1712010 100563 KEEHR, GREGORY 65.11 FLOWERS FOR PLANTERS 238357 060910 5841.6406 65.12 FLOWERS FOR PLANTERS 238357 060910 5861.6406 130.23 126696 KERR, CHRISTINE 101.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT- FINCH 238561 060910 1470.4329 101.00 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR SEASON TICKETS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE FEES 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 14 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 175.00 CITY OF EDINA 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 175.00 6/17/2010 — 6/17/2010 336717 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335714 611712010 118466 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA UNIFORM PURCHASE 238250 060910 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 217.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238358 061010 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 217.50 335718 336715 6/17/2010 100606 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 104979 KOCON, ED 168.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238359 060910 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 168.00 54.95 335716 6/17/2010 126697 KREFTING, WAYNE 336719 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 15 Business Unit CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 175.00 PERFORMANCE 6/24/10 238533 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 336717 6/17/2010 120511 KUSKE, BRANDON 91.15 UNIFORM PURCHASE 238250 060910 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 91.15 335718 6/1712010 100606 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 54.95 UNIFORM JACKET 238562 08625234 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 54.95 336719 6/17/2010 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 200.51 REPAIRS TO MOWER 00002086 238360 212081 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 200.51 335720 6/17/2010 122700 LARSON, DAN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/28/10 238536 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 335721 6/1712010 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 290.16 WASHERS, NUTS, BOLTS 00005746 238251 9270056 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 290.16 336722 611712010 100864 LEITNER COMPANY 1,546.08 TOPDRESSING SAND 238493 RICHAR6 /1 5431.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,546.08 336723 6/17/2010 100226 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 460.00 WHISTLES, LANYARDS 238492 INVO15639 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 460.00 335724 6/1712010 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 260.00 238419 3704 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 260.00 336726 6/17/2010 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,693.21 238630 87460 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,693.21 336726 6/17/2010 100866 MAGNUSON SOD 83.36 ROCK, SOD, DIRT 238563 053110 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 130.31 ROCK, SOD, DIRT 238563 053110 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 137.82 ROCK, SOD, DIRT 238563 053110 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 156.01 ROCK, SOD, DIRT 238563 053110 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 542.14 ROCK, SOD, DIRT 238563 053110 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 664.50 ROCK, SOD, DIRT 238563 053110 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,714.14 335727 6/1712010 110796 MASON- CUTTERS 380.00 ASPHALT SAWING 00005673 238252 M -27723 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 380.00 336728 6117/2010 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 155.00 WELL INSPECTION 238494 23234 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 155.00 336729 6/17/2010 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS 191.18 UNIFORM PURCHASE 238253 060810 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 191.18 336730 6/1712010 101987 MENARDS 54.04 DOCK SUPPLIES 00002093 238361 85840 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 68.56 SOIL, MULCH 00002297 238495 89665 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 66.31 MULCH 00002104 238496 90281 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 11.38 UTILITY KNIFE, POLISH 00002104 238497 90277 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 200.29 336731 6/1712010 102281 MENARDS 199.11 BUILDING MATERIALS 00005825 238564 42912 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 235.46 BUILDING MATERIALS 00005821 238565 40620 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.36 LUMBER 00005829 238566 42849 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 455.93 335732 6/17/2010 126586 METALLIC ARTS 494.37 SIGNS 00002272 238498 15956 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 GUN SAFETY FIELD DAY 238501 060710 CITY OF EDINA CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 30.00 Council Check Register 335739 6/17/2010 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 WORKSHOP 238255 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 494.37 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 335733 6/17/2010 0084776 -IN 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 84.65 57.39 MESH BAGS 238362 124390 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.77 FIELD PAINT 00005826 238567 124408 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 55.60 227.16 335734 6/17/2010 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 24,969.00 SAC FOR MAY 2010 238363 060810 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES 24, 969.00 336736 6117/2010 121063 MILLER, SUSAN 16.43 PETTY CASH 238499 061110 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 45.00 PETTY CASH 238499 061110 5621.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 77.52 PETTY CASH 238499 061110 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 288.09 PETTY CASH 238499 061110 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 427.04 335736 6/17/2010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 19.95 CO2 00006041 238364 R105100120 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.82 CO2, METHANE 238500 R105100255 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 49.77 335737 6/17/2010 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 49.65 AIRWASH SENSOR 00005782 238254 1201879 -00 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.65 335738 6/17/2010 100245 MINNESOTA DNR 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page 17 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER FIELD MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK GRILL PSTF FIRE TOWER WELL HOUSES 30.00 GUN SAFETY FIELD DAY 238501 060710 7414.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 30.00 335739 6/17/2010 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS 30.00 WORKSHOP 238255 6680 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 30.00 335740 6/17/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 84.65 HOSE FITTINGS 00005575 238256 0084776 -IN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 84.65 336741 6/17/2010 100898 MINVALCO 55.60 BUSHINGS, FITTINGS 00005800 238257 752944 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 55.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 611712010 CITY OF EDINA 336744 6117/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. Council Check Register 3,354.83 SIGNS 00005862 238260 122.34 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 00002080 238366 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00006279 238502 336742 6117/2010 5422.6530 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 29.18 PLUG, O -RING 00006256 238503 37.03 ANTI - FREEZE 00005859 238258 480561 F6 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS JR GOLF REFUND 58.21 MOTOR ASSEMBLY 00005755 238365 480647F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 335746 611712010 95.24 335743 611712010 80.00 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 238180 050710 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 18 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,118.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT 238259 78144044 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,118.39 611712010 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 336744 6117/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 3,354.83 SIGNS 00005862 238260 122.34 IRRIGATION HEADS 00002080 238366 733976 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 141.72 SOLENOID, SWITCHES 00006279 238502 733596 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 29.18 PLUG, O -RING 00006256 238503 735127 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 293.24 JR GOLF REFUND 238568 061010 5401.4592 335746 611712010 117034 NAPC 80.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 238180 050710 1140.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 80.00 37.28 POOL TEST TABS 238181 336746 6/17/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 37.28 316.50 238420 60229 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 73.50 238421 60226 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 372.50 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 238422 60228 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 335747 611712010 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 3,354.83 SIGNS 00005862 238260 TI- 0222251 1325.6531 3,354.83 335748 6117/2010 126695 NORD, JANNA 85.00 JR GOLF REFUND 238568 061010 5401.4592 85.00 336749 6/17/2010 100927 NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC 37.28 POOL TEST TABS 238181 49594 1490.6406 37.28 335750 6/1712010 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 238261 80186165 1400.6230 557.72 SIGNS & POSTS CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PLANNING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET NAME SIGNS GREEN FEES NINE HOLES GOLF REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335761 6/1712010 116114 OCE 155.33 APRIL MAINTENANCE 238569 987141696 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 116.48 MAY MAINTENANCE 238570 897176760 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 271.81 336762 6/17/2010 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 180.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00008048 238262 519571624001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 180.60 336753 6/17/2010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 170.95 CHAIN, HOOKS 00005799 238504 595988 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 170.95 335764 6117/2010 118891 OLSON, LYNN 55.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 238367 061010 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.97 335765 6/1712010 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 310.00 ADVENTURE PEAK PADS 238505 2063 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 500.00 INSTALL ICE MACHINE 238506 2064 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 810.00 335766 6/17/2010 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 137.08 COOKIES 238182 80046346 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 329.51 COOKIES 238368 80047337 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 466.59 336767 6117/2010 104896 OVERHEAD DOOR CO. 238.95 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00008062 238263 65136 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 238.95 336768 6/17/2010 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 720.75 HVAC CONTRACT 238369 34344 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 720.75 335759 6117/2010 100347_ PAUSTIS & SONS 1,445.02 238306 8262952 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 665.15 238423 8263089 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 725.51 238424 8263139 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,117.50 238425 8263099 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,445.02 238426 8262953 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,781.81 238631 8263081 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 7,180.01 336760 6/17/2010 2,502.50 2,417.50 4,920.00 336761 611712010 Supplier / Explanation 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. TECHNICAL SUPPORT TECHNICAL SUPPORT 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 -6/17/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account-No. Subledger Account Description 238589 51510004 238590 52910004 238370 61933594 238371 61184005 336762 6/17/2010 126978 PETSMART#469 85.80 K9 FOOD 00003090 238264 T -2739 85.80 335763 6/17/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 148.09 238427 2921106 1,892.85 238428 2921107 3,510.64 238429 2921105 7.58- 238430 3438111 41.07 238632 2921104 3,483.16 238633 2921103 1,265.10 238634 2921099 1,968.51 238635 2921101 922.68 238636 2921100 536.08 238637 2921097 754.34 238638 2921098 1,181.20 238639 2921096 2,980.00 238640 2921102 335764 6/1712010 104717 PHILLIPS, RAYMOND 15.00 LICENSE UPGRADE 238183 060810 15.00 335766 6117/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 79.89 TIRE 00005648 238265 587884 79.89 336766 6117/2010 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 126.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008061 238266 247878 1554.6103 1554.6103 5421.5510 4075.5510 4607.6406 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 5919.6260 1553.6530 5521.6215 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 20 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GRILL VANVALKENBURG EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING LICENSES & PERMITS REPAIR PARTS TRAINING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6115/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 126.00 335767 6117/2010 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 1,746.75 WATER QUALITY STUDY 00005697 238507 09026.06 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,746.75 335768 6/17/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 3,350.33 238307 315967 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 531.25 238308 315786 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 163.20 238309 316025 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,069.20 238310 314951 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,026.02 238311 311242 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,558.81 238312 311241 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 335.90 238313 314952 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 196.80 238314 315788 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 725.33 238315 315979 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,007.51 238431 315971 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,207.28 - 238432 315968 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,716.94 238433 315787 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19.00 238434 315970 -CO 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,558.81 238435 311243 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 835.30 238436 315969 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19,301.68 335769 611712010 123898 QWEST 296.84 612 E24 -8656 238267 8656 -6/10 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 528.51 612 E24 -8657 238268 8657 -6/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 527.96 612 E01 -8392 238269 8392 -6/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 52.31 952 926 -0092 238270 0092 -6/10 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 87.18 952 926 -0419 238271 0419 -6/10 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.99 651 281 -1355 B001311 238272 1311 -6/10 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 606.52 612 E01 -0426 238372 0426 -6/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52 612 E12 -6797 238373 6797 -6/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.96 238508 052810 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.66 238508 052810 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 99.34 238508 052810 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 107.71 238508 052810 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 117.39 238508 052810 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 166.14 238508 052810 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING 8 HOCKEY 235.04 238508 052810 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 256.57 238508 052810 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 266.71 238508 052810 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORIV `DER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 — 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,062.09 238508 052810 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 336770 6/1712010 110777 RAINBOW TREECARE 529.99 DUTCH ELM DISEASE TREATMENT 00001831 238571 1167267 1644.6103 529.99 335771 6/17/2010 106807 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CO. IN 126.80 K9 SUPPLIES 238273 255705 4607.6406 126.80 335772 6117/2010 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 428.00 WATER METER INSTALLATION 00005689 238184 12152 5913.6180 428.00 335773 6/1712010 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 135.96 SAFETY BOOTS 00005880 238509 72500001191 5630.6610 135.96 336774 6/17/2010 126936 REINDERS 1,359.45 FERTILIZER 00005619 238572 3004554 -00 1643.6540 1,359.45 336776 6/17/2010 126693 REINHART, DIANE 100.00 RENTAL REFUND 238573 061010 5601.4555 100.00 335776 611712010 108669 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 6/21/10 238530 060110 5631.6136 100.00 335777 611712010 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 44.60 SPRING HANGER KIT, BUSHING 00005647 238510 1151884-01 1553.6530 44.60 336778 6/17/2010 100982 ROTO- ROOTER 495.00 FLOOR DRAIN MAINTENANCE 00002073 238374 04815553242 5630.6180 403.75 DRAIN CLEANING 00002095 238375 04815553694 5630.6180 898.75 335779 6/17/2010 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 62.55 BAKERY 238376 283578 5421.5510 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page- 22 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EB /CL REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 -6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION LAUNDRY POOL CONCESSIONS LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 62.55 335780 6/17/2010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 542.90 101= *****'9350 238185 TABLES, CHAIRS 4402.6710 439.58 101: *****'9350 00001029 238511 CHAIRS 4402.6710 3.98 101"" "'9350 238574 061010 1623.6406 32.50 101: "" "9350 238574 061010 1624.6406 1,018.96 336781 6/17/2010 118940 SAMS IRRIGATION SERVICE CO. 307.04 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 238512 291 5620.6180 307.04 335782 611712010 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 73.74 ARMREST 00005639 238274 1049525 1553.6530 73.74 335783 6/17/2010 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 210.37 PAINT 00008049 238275 2035 -7 5511.6532 210.37 336784 6117/2010 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 109.90 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238595 061110 5631.6107 109.90 336786 6/17/2010 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 14.50 STAFF POLO SHIRT 238513 349178 5311.6201 130.50 STAFF POLO SHIRTS 238514 349177 5320.6201 251.00 STAFF POLO SHIRTS 238514 349177 5311.6201 396.00 335786 611712010 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 3,285.00 FIRE ALARM PANEL INSTALLATION 00006004 238515 40211609 5420.6250 3,285.00 336787 6/17/2010 101000 SIR SPEEDY 77.16 EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS 238186 65204 1550.6406 77.16 336788 6/17/2010 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 170.52 PROPANE 00005866 238276 052410 1301.6406 170.52 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION LAUNDRY POOL CONCESSIONS LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335789 6/17/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 601.47 MACHINE REPAIR 00005626 238277 SF06865 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 601.47 335790 6/17/2010 103668 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 24 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.00 PERFORMANCE 6/27/10 238535 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 75.00 335791 6/17/2010 102193 STAN BANN BIG BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 6120/10 238528 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 335792 611712010 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 1,302.30 PRINTER CARTRIDGES 238187 102606436 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,302.30 335793 6/17/2010 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 1,025.00 WANT AD 238516 053110 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,025.00 335794 6/17/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 39.76 HANDLE 00005081 238278 234230 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,887.80 VEHICLE REPAIR 00005109 238279 572381 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 935.00 VEHICLE REPAIR 00005108 238280 572849 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.00 REMOVE DECALS 00005107 238281 573128 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 411.93 VEHICLE REPAIR 00005111 238282 573050 1653.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 712.60 VEHICLE REPAIR 00005113 238283 573885 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.80 GASKETS 00005752 238377 244369 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,067.89 335796 6/17/2010 122088 SUMMIT FISCAL AGENCY 1.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 238575 060810 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1.00 335796 6117/2010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,110.00 238316 Z00829 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 971.00 238317 00239. 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,081.00 335797 6/17/2010 119637 SWEENEY, J. SHAWN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/29/10 238534 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 336798 611712010 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 238378 318810 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 25 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 38.00 GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 336799 6/17/2010 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 314.20 238379 594146 5421.5514 860.00 238380 00771274 5421.5514 4,350.80 238437 594943 5862.5514 73.25 238438 594944 5862.5515 51598.25 335800 611712010 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 283.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 238517 2010 -42995 5822.6122 283.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 238517 2010 -42995 5842.6122 283.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 238517 2010 -42995 5862.6122 850.00 335801 611712010 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 73.63 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 238588 061410 1624.6406 73.63 336802 6/17/2010 116346 TODD COUNTY 335.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 238580 061410 1000.2055 335.00 336803 6/17/2010 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING 99.00 PAINT POSTER FRAME 238518 060810 5311.6532 99.00 336804 6/1712010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 40.80 WELDING TANKS 238381 402396 5630.6406 40.80 335806 6/17/2010 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 215.84 COPIER USAGE 238519 152976213 7410.6575 215.84 336806 6117/2010 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 238382 25463 5820.6160 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 238382 25463 5840.6160 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 25 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PLAYGROUND & THEATER DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PAINT POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF LDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/1712010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 238382 25463 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WORKERS COMPENSATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BANK SERVICES CHARGES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS CONSULTING DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 6/1512010 9:01:43 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION GENERAL TURF CARE CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT GRILL GRILL 42.75 335807 6/17/2010 126577 TRAIL 125.00 PRINTING / POSTAGE 238383 101 1629.6103 125.00 335808 6117/2010 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 112.22 WEED SPRAYING 00005846 238576 790862 1643.6103 144.29 LAWN CARE 00005845 238577 791906 1551.6103 256.51 336809 6117/2010 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 224.40 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM 238520 101670416 1301.6045 224.40 336810 611712010 116379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 238285 060310 1500.6103 159.70 INTERNET 238285 060310 1550.6155 141.03 MEETING EXPENSES 238384 JUN310 1120.6106 9.70 LOCK (LOCK & KEY) 238521 JUNE32010 1301.6406 33.70 DISCS (HOME DEPOT) 238521 JUNE32010 1646.6406 262.16 TOOLS (ACME TOOLS 238521 JUNE32010 1301.6556 265.00 LICENSE 238521 JUNE32010 07101.1705.20 265.00 LICENSE 238521 JUNE32010 1647.6406 1,154.19 336811 6117/2010 122221 'UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 276.96 SHOCKMOUNTS, V -13ELT 00005515 238284 87359461 -001 1553.6530 276.96 335812 6/17/2010 121153 UNIVERSITY OF MN ALUMNI BAND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/23/10 238532 060110 5631.6136 150.00 335813 6117/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 15.53 SHIPPING CHARGE 00005691 238188 TRAN:1997 5915.6103 15.53 335814 6/1712010 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 19.75 CUST 43805514 238385 053110 5421.6511 464.58 CUST 43805514 238385 053110 5421.6406 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WORKERS COMPENSATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BANK SERVICES CHARGES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS CONSULTING DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 6/1512010 9:01:43 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION GENERAL TURF CARE CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT GRILL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,533.59 CUST 43805514 238385 053110 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1550.6188 5913.6180 5862.6512 5421.6511 5421.6406 5862.6512 5840.6406 5821.6406 1646.6406 5630.6406 5423.6530 5862.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5311.6511 5320.5510 TELEPHONE CONTRACTED REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 27 Business Unit GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF CARS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 4,017.92 335815 6/1712010 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.47 PAGER 238189 T6096083F 13.47 335816 6/1712010 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 4,356.49. EMERGENCY REPAIR 00005699 238522 15507 4,356.49 336817 6/17/2010 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 853.49 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS 00007513 238190 161663 -00 230.84 SOAP, CUPS 00006347 238386 162080 -00 1,627.68 TISSUE, CUPS 238387 162326 -00 6.41- CREDIT 238388 162285CM 101.73 TOWELS, SOAP 00007512 238523 161634 -00 104.24 TOWELS, SOAP 238524 161657 -00 179.61 TISSUE 00005828 238578 162766 -00 3,091.18 335818 6/17/2010 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 9.45 TIE DOWNS 00002071 238286 47960 11.39 HANDLE 00006447 238287 48037 20.84 336819 6/1712010 126327 VINOANDES 178.10 238439 1465 178.10 335820 6/17/2010 119454 VINOCOPIA 532.00 238318 0026603 -IN 196.00 238641 0026827 -IN 782.00 238642 0026828 -IN 1,510.00 336821 6/17/2010 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 190.55 CLEANING PRODUCTS 238191 28310157 2,327.79 CONCESSION PRODUCT 238191 28310157 2,518.34 336822 6/17/2010 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. 1550.6188 5913.6180 5862.6512 5421.6511 5421.6406 5862.6512 5840.6406 5821.6406 1646.6406 5630.6406 5423.6530 5862.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5311.6511 5320.5510 TELEPHONE CONTRACTED REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 27 Business Unit GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF CARS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF tuINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 - 6/1712010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 281.08 SEAL KIT 238391 83315 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6530 1346.6406 1346.6406 1346.6406 1400.6103 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 28 Business Unit POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 281.08 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 335823 6/17/2010 VERNON SELLING 120009 WALL ENTERPRISES INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,081.01 238645 234.54 CERAMIC WHEELS 00005593 238288 L- 602 -11 320654 5822.5513 234.54 335824 6/17/2010 124396 WEBER, ANN 450.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEANUP 238584 061410 450.00 336826 6/17/2010 126699 WEBER, JESSE 444.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEANUP 238586 061410 444.00 336826 611712010 124395 WEBER, STEPHANIE 444.00 EDINA ART FAIR CLEANUP 238585 061410 444.00 336827 611712010 124199 WEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES 480.00 MAY 2010 SERVICES 238289 820723137 480.00 335828 6/17/2010 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI 156.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238579 061410 156.50 335829 6117/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 456.40 238440 244564 -00 954.10 238441 244563 -00 1,692.40 238442 244649 -00 30.67- 238443 244067 -00 1553.6530 1346.6406 1346.6406 1346.6406 1400.6103 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 28 Business Unit POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WANE VERNON SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 335830 6/17/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,943,81 238643 320656 5842.5513 85.87 238644 320655 5842.5513 1,081.01 238645 320657 5862.5513 669.60 238646 320654 5822.5513 4,780.29 336831 611712010 117482 WINECONNECT INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Council Check Register Page - 29 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 159.24 WEB - JUNE 2010 238525 549 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 335832 6117/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,051.89 238319 407778 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 14,740.74 238320 407783 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8,086.21 238321 411093 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 168.82 238322 411094 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,532.05 238323 407139 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 37.05 238324 411096 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,456.57 238325 411095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 53.50 238326 411091 5822.5515 COST OF ,GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,427.65 238444 407138 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,180.46 238445 411087 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,408.85 238446 411089 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 575.40 238447 409980 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,262.36 238448 409675 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 730.80 238449 411092 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 233.10- 238450 802479 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 39.29- 238451 803145 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 26.78- 238452 803117 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 50,413.18 336833 6/17/2010 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,268.80 238327 617823 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 120.00 238328 617824 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 220.80 238389 616595 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 245.40 238390 616143 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,821.75 238453 617176 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,819.80 238454 616867 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 742.35 238647 619635 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,436.64 238648 619890 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 108.00 238649 619891 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10,783.54 336834 6117/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,213.55 238329 249359 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 885.69 238330 249358 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 271.90 238455 249357 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,371.14 336835 6117" 101726 XCEL ENERGY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/17/2010 — 6/17/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,164.25 51- 6621207 -1 238192 241177802 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,517.86 51- 9013604 -6 238193 241068855 5913.6185 LIGHT &POWER 28.93 51- 7567037 -0 238194 241021537 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 26.75 51- 4151897 -6 238195 240970506 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 987.89 51- 6979948-4 238196 241014384 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,159.88 51- 6979948.4 238196 241014384 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,417.32 51- 6979948 -4 238196 241014384 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER 490.74 51- 6137136 -8 238197 241000880 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER 5,429.52 51- 6824328 -7 238392 241438583 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,979.27 51- 6840050 -6 238393 241439000 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER 30,577.44 51- 5605640 -1 238596 242048408 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER 5,209.01 51- 6121102 -5 238597 241664191 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50,988.86 336836 6/17/2010 14,335.19 8,506.86 22, 842.05 336837 6/17/2010 492.00 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. UNLEADED FUEL 00001010 238394 984728 1553.6581 DIESEL FUEL 00001010 238526 984473 1553.6581 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 238650 9577 5842.5513 336838 6/17/2010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 281.70 ICE PACKS 238527 54066035 281.70 740,562.86 Grand Total GASOLINE GASOLINE 6/15/2010 9:01:43 Page - 30 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT WELL PUMPS BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 740,562.86 Total Payments 740,562.86 PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/17/2010 - 6/17/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 318,697.68 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 14,346.24 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,390.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 3,046.67 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 258.70 05100 ART CENTER FUND 5,147.31 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,388.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,649.62 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 34,656.92 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 6,753.73 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 19,523.45 05800 LIQUOR FUND 228,229.39 05900 UTILITY FUND 61,172.19 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 823.73 05950 RECYCLING FUND 37,683.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 796.23 Report Totals 740,562.86 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polices qnd procedures d e p .1."' Fi er 6/15/2010 9:02:28 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page- 1 6/1812010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336839 6/18/2010 105123 THEMESCAPES INC. 5,150.00 AQUATIC CENTER REPAIRS 238714 21051 -1 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 5,150.00 335840 6/24/2010 126163 A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP. 11,476.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 239108 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 11,476.00 335841 6/24/2010 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 74.55 DIRT 00001417 238651 33263 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 53.58 DIRT 00001417 238652 33294 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 128.13 336842 6/24/2010 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 2,611.62 JANITORIAL SERVICES 238653 1274256 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,611.62 336843 6/24/2010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 31.60 238721 0333303 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 13.00 236722 0806319 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 121.00 238723 0333304 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 74.80 238724 0723929 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 82.00 238725 0333227 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 58.40 238726 0806219 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 54.60 238961 0723963 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 87.00 238962 0806324 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 107.20 238963 0333305 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 629.60 336844 6/24/2010 123309 ACTION FLEET INC. 3,837.49 SQUAD UPGRADE 238654 6510 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 506.72 K -9 UNIT MAINTENANCE 238720 7453 4607.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 4,344.21 336845 6/24/2010 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 896.38 ALARM MONITORING 238858 26335807 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 896.38 336846 6/2412010 119813 AERIAL PAINTING INC. 5,580.00 POLE PAINTING 00005896 236860 0009220 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5,580.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 25,764.00 CITY OF EDINA 335852 Council Check Register 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336847 6/24/2010 106991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 336863 612412010 220.45 COFFEE 238655 126427 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 220.45 310.71 HOSE CLAMPS, ADJUSTMENTS 00005397 238657 35917 335848 6/24/2010 100676 ALL SAFE INC. 102.73 HOSE CLAMPS, FITTINGS 00005527 238658 36681 1314.6406 74.81 BRACKETS 00003757 238785 99903 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.81 335864 6/24/2010 335849 6124/2010 102382 ANDERSON, MOLLY 247.41 COFFEE 97.82 UNIFORM PURCHASE 238859 061610 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 247.41 97.82 335860 6/24/2010 119976 AP LAWN 1,861.03 SPRING CLEANING & FERTILIZING 00002097 239141 ANDRSN -0511 5650,6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5913.6520 CONCRETE 1,861.03 801.97 READY MIX 238862 336861 6/24/2010 CONCRETE 126390 API GARAGE DOOR STORE 829.62 READY MIX 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page- 2 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROMENADE 25,764.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 239109 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING GRILL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL STORM SEWER 25,764.00 335852 6/2412010 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 820.94 FOOD 238656 1372524 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 820.94 336863 612412010 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 310.71 HOSE CLAMPS, ADJUSTMENTS 00005397 238657 35917 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102.73 HOSE CLAMPS, FITTINGS 00005527 238658 36681 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 413.44 335864 6/24/2010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 247.41 COFFEE 238659 416524 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 247.41 335866 612412010 120996 AVR INC. 746.66 READY MIX 238861 31698 5913.6520 CONCRETE 801.97 READY MIX 238862 31697 5913.6520 CONCRETE 829.62 READY MIX 238863 31758 5913.6520 CONCRETE 373.53 READY MIX 238864 31884 5913.6520 CONCRETE 373.53 READY MIX 238865 32013 5913.6520 CONCRETE 1,050.85 READY MIX 238866 32167 1314.6520 CONCRETE 373.53 READY MIX 238867 31952 5913.6520 CONCRETE 2,286.59 READY MIX 238868 32469 5932.6520 CONCRETE GRILL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6123/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 3 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,650.37 READY MIX 238869 32575 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,000.08 READY MIX 238870 32658 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,077.30 READY MIX 238871 33104 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,154.25 READY MIX 238872 32932 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,008.05 READY MIX, BUCKEYE FIBERS 238873 33007 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,681.14 READY MIX, BUCKEYE FIBERS 238873 33007 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 641.25 READY MIX 238874 33520 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 564.30 READY MIX 238875 33367 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,283.20 READY MIX 238876 33889 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,257.20 READY MIX 238877 33807 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 22,153.42 335856 6/2412010 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 137.53 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 238660 3307 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 65.00 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 238661 3311 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 202.53 336867 6/2412010 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 105.00 GIS MAPPING 238786 23271068.00 -6 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 3,308.50 WATER RESOURCES MGMT 238787 23271072.00 -8 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 3,413.50 336858 6124/2010 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 222.90 BATTERY 00005760 238878 2932 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 222.90 336859 6/24/2010 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 802.85 238727 53640800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,000.25 238728 53640900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 205.49 238729 83768700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 208.59 238730 5944300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 17.56- 238731 83713500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 41.00 238964 53641400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 193.55 238965 53716100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 61.40 238966 83796100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 79.65 238967 83768800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,575.22 336860 6/24/2010 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 42.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 238879 061710 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 42.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335861 6/24/2010 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 46,721.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 239110 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 46,721.00 335862 6/2412010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 21.80 FILE JACKETS 238662 WO- 621058 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 118.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238663 WO- 627454 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 116.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238788 OE- 228479 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 81.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238789 OE- 228653 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 337.45 336863 6/24/2010 100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 63,103.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239111 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 63,103.75 335864 6/24/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 26.70 ENVELOPES 00003755 238790 60461.1 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 142.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003755 238791 60461 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 32.05- CREDIT 239142 4589CM 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.90 335865 6/24/2010 126745 BOETTAGE, EMILY 75.00 JR GOLF LEAGUE REFUND 239143 061810 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES 75.00 335866 6/2412010 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 13,962.50 PROSECUTING 238664 46142 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,962.50 335867 6124/2010 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 556.78 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003740 238792 87154145 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 878.22 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003725 238793 87154144 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 893.38 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003740 238794 87152984 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 2,328.38 335868 6/24/2010 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,005.28 238732 99593 5842.5513 1,005.28 335869 6/24/2010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 615.32 MUFFLER, CLAMP 00005655 238880 412406 1553.6530 15.65 SEALS 00005761 238881 412940 1553.6530 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 4 Business Unit PW BUILDING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GOLF REVENUES LEGAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 658.44 4402.6710 CITY OF EDINA 4402.6710 336870 6/2412010 4402.6710 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC Council Check Register 975.75 MATERIALS TESTING 6/18/2010 - 6/2412010 320444 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 13.79 O -RING 00005761 238882 413371 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 133.59- CORE RETURN 00005749 238883 408621C 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 17.01 GASKETS, RING, SEAL 00005761 238884 413197 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 130.26 PIPE 00005660 238885 413783 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 01362.1705.21 01360.1705.21 10041.1705.20 5440.5511 CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4402.6710 658.44 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4402.6710 336870 6/2412010 4402.6710 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 975.75 MATERIALS TESTING 238795 320444 567.00 MATERIALS TESTING 238796 320443 4,080.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 238797 320440 5,622.75 336871 6/24/2010 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 192.00 GOLF BALLS 239070 1001745185 192.00 335872 6124/2010 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 11,412.75 BOARDWALK PAVERS 00001232 238798 11988820 -00 961.88 ENVIROSEAL 00005783 238799 11995451 -01 961.88 ENVIROSEAL 00005783 238800 11995451 -02 577.13 ENVIROSEAL 00005783 238801 11995451 -00 13,913.64 336873 6/24/2010 112843 C. R. FISCHER & SONS INC. 1,700.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIRS 238802 100304 1,700.00 336874 6/24/2010 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 6,317.59 ASPHALT 00001210 238886 8057MB 6,317.59 335875 6/24/2010 102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/5/10 239144 061710 100.00 335876 6/24/2010 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 116.51 MERCHANDISE 239071 921512866 101.15 MERCHANDISE 239072 921476207 213.58 239073 921506965 291.57 239074 921512888 291.57 239075 921476183 83.04 239076 921486042 01362.1705.21 01360.1705.21 10041.1705.20 5440.5511 CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1314.6518 5631.6136 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 BLACKTOP PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PW BUILDING PW BUILDING PW BUILDING PW BUILDING GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/18/2010 -6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364.27 239077 921469967 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,141.35 239078 921458375 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 390.94 239079 921469986 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 337.21 239080 921458395 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 959.13 239081 921469943 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 99.70 239082 921458355 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 252.00 239083 921396683 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,212.00 239084 921396703 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.90 239085 921490733 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 98.00 239086 921451180 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 156.80 239087 921451200 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 156.80 239088 921445972 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6,368.52 335877 6/24/2010 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 60.30 238733 11020 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,661.75 238734 11023 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 429.10 238735 11018 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 15.50 238736 11016 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,166.65 335878 6/24/2010 100677 CARGILL INC. 5,663.34 DE -ICER 00005071 238665 2837844 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 11,206.79 DE -ICER 00005071 238666 2838536 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 13,194.74 DE -ICER 00005071 238667 2839285 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 7,340.82 DE -ICER 00005071 238668 2840360 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 37,405.69 335879 6/24/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 92.00 238737 86628 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 196.00 238968 86643 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 288.00 335880 6/24/2010 101616 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 338.90 CONCRETE, TOOLS 00005830 238887 1220772 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 338.90 335881 6/2412010 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 151.61 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 238669 68377 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 151.61 335882 6/24/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 7 6/18/2010 —6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 428.00 238738 420601 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING DESIGN 5101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE CONSULTING DESIGN BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT CONSULTING DESIGN BA -380 69TH ST M&O GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX WORKERS COMPENSATION TOOLS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 428.00 335883 6/24/2010 106402 CHURCHILL, LEE 714.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 239134 061710 4077.6103 714.00 335884 612412010 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 500.00 GRAFFITI NET FEE 238888 061710 1400.6105 500.00 335885 6/2412010 106693 CITYSPRINT 23.69 DELIVERY OF PLAN SETS 238803 18936 07101.1705.20 47.38 DELIVERY OF PLAN SETS 238803 18936 01367.1705.20 77.73 DELIVERY OF PLAN SETS 238803 18936 01380.1705.20 148.80 335886 6/24/2010 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 251.24 HYDRANT BAGS 00003737 238804 133258 1470.6406 251.24 335887 6/24/2010 126726 COBRA PUMA GOLF INC. 124.25 MERCHANDISE 239089 A20280 5440.5511 124.25 335888 6/24/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 646.70 238739 0138088719 5862.5515 659.50 238969 0118239335 5842.5515 1,306.20 336889 6/24/2010 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL 971.00 WORKERS COMP 239186 1470989 1400.6045 971.00 336890 6/24/2010 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 127.63 MEASURING WHEEL 00006551 238670 0047235 -IN 1301.6556 127.63 336891 6/24/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 406,638.00 ARENA RINK FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 238889 70932 5500.1705 406,638.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING DESIGN 5101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE CONSULTING DESIGN BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT CONSULTING DESIGN BA -380 69TH ST M&O GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX WORKERS COMPENSATION TOOLS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 238740 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 22.40 238741 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,735.30 238742 556369 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335892 6/24/2010 119899 CREEKSIDE SOILS 335900 6/24/2010 124367 DELANEY, ALICE 1,980.61 WOOD CHIPS DELIVERED 00005831 238890 63758 -23036 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 061010 5101.4413 1,980.61 ART CENTER REVENUES 181.35 335893 6/24/2010 126736 CURTIS, DONALD 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 150.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 239145 062110 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 150.00 335894 6124/2010 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 310.45 CLUTCH RELEASE 00005574 238671 150181 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 15.45 SPRING 00005574 238672 150177 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 651.94 BROOM ASSEMBLY, SCARIFIER 00005827 238891 150230 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 977.84 336896 6/24/2010 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. 2,594.93 FIELD SUPPLIES 00005833 238901 10601 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,594.93 335896 6/24/2010 122096 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 54.50 LUMBER 00005591 238892 147224 1646.6577 LUMBER 54.50 335897 612412010 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 1,795.50 WATER METERS 00005693 238893 6498476 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,795.50 335898 6/24/2010 126727 DALE TILE COMPANY 36,147.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239112 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 36,147.50 335899 6/24/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 8 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE METER REPAIR PW BUILDING 2,438.45 238740 556367 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 22.40 238741 556368 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,735.30 238742 556369 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,159.70 238743 555277 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 10,355.85 335900 6/24/2010 124367 DELANEY, ALICE 181.35 ART WORK SOLD 239058 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 181.35 335901 612412010 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/18/2010 -6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 58.39 BAKERY 238673 335986 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 113.10 BAKERY 238894 336066 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 80.76 BAKERY 238895 336065 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 31.88 BAKERY 238896 336271 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 62.31 BAKERY 239146 336511 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 346.44 335902 6124/2010 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 47.93 FARMERS MARKET POSTCARDS 238897 35699 5631.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 47.93 336903 6/24/2010 124368 DILL, SARAH 157.30 ART WORK SOLD 239059 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 157.30 336904 6/24/2010 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 107.25 ART WORK SOLD 239060 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 107.25 336905 6/2412010 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 96.00 LEGAL 238674 1657082 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 96.00 335906 6124/2010 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 1,035.88 FA -2 CHIPS 00001209 238898 70791 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 1,039.67 FA -2 CHIPS 00001209 238899 71033 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 2,075.55 335907 6/24/2010 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 63.75 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 239135 061710 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 63.75 336908 6/24/2010 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 213.00 MAY WASHES 238676 4256 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 213.00 336909 6/24/2010 106467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 2,635.00 ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 238900 061610 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 2,635.00 335910 6/24/2010 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 457.00 BEER /WINE 00006338 238677 113 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/1812010 — 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 457.00 335911 6/24/2010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE CALCULATION 238678 60793 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 2,000.00 335912 6124/2010 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 1,564.95 REPLACE PUMP MOTOR 00005680 238679 376240 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,564.95 335913 6/2412010 126759 ELLINGSON, LINDA 149.95 MAH JONG SET 239147 061410 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 149.95 335914 6/24/2010 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 7,160.63 MH LIDS 00001221 238902 NN1360 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 7,160.63 335916 6/24/2010 104991 EVANS, CONNIE 82.16 FOOD 238903 061610 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 82.16 335916 6124/2010 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 2,374.73 ACQUISITION AGENT 239148 00 -9898 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE 1,866.50 ACQUISTION AGENT 239149 00 -9914 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE 4,241.23 335917 6/24/2010 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 224.50 238744 855529 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 224.50 335918 6/24/2010 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 23.53 GOLF PHOTOS 238680 T2- 277022 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 23.53 335919 6124/2010 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 426.00 BOOTS 238805 6636 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 426.00 336920 6/24/2010 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 238806 19490 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335921 6124/2010 106192 FLAMING RIVER INDUSTRIES INC. 559.40 SWITCHES 00005645 238681 155116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 559.40 335922 6/24/2010 101475 FOOTJOY 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 11 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 498.09 MERCHANDISE 239090 3139532 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 48.34 239091 3149651 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 59.96 239092 3201059 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 54.61 239093 3161004 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 78.31 239094 3185191 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 73.59 239095 3197766 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 810.84 239096 3209284 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 59.99 239097 3215082 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 39.44 239098 3157473 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,723.17 335923 6/24/2010 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 9,992.81 AERIAL LIFT 00005080 238807 01E1466230 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 9,992.81 336924 6/24/2010 126725 FORTNER, NOLA 52.00 ART WORK SOLD 239061 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 52.00 336926 6124/2010 122086 FULGENCY, E. 148.20 ART WORK SOLD 239062 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 148.20 335926 6/24/2010 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL CO. INC. 359,400.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 239113 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 359,400.20 335927 6/24/2010 102658 GLEWWE DOORS INC. 267.00 DOOR HANDLE PARTS 239150 150785 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 267.00 336928 6/24/2010 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.09 R -91 PHONE 238808 2205213 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.09 335929 6/2417' 101679 GOLFCRAFT INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/18/2010 - 6124/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341.50 MERCHANDISE 239099 21996 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 341.50 335930 6/24/2010 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO. 250.00 RESTRIPE PARKING LOT 00005940 238904 10054 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 700.00 RESTRIPE PARKING LOT 00005939 238905 10055 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 750.00 RESTRIPE PARKING LOT 00005938 238906 10053 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,700.00 335931 6/2412010 101103 GRAINGER 63.70 SAFETY GLASSES 00005865 238682 9271856404 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 63.70 SAFETY GLASSES 00005884 238907 9274216127 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 96.82 SAFETY GAS CAN 00001871 238908 9271856412 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 267.04 GLOVES, PENS 00005811 238909 9269067261 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 491.26 336932 6124/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 509.50 238745 119747 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,067.25 238970 119644 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,576.75 336933 6/24/2010 126633 GRAPHIC SOURCE INC. 198.46 WINDOW SIGN 238683 31667 -IN 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 198.46 336934 6124/2010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 115.45 LIGHTS 00005937 238913 948060984 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 115.45 336935 6/24/2010 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 493.41 LAWN SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001032 238910 101739 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 489.90 LAWN SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001031 238911 101731 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 419.82 LAWN SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001030 238912 101730 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 1,403.13 336936 6/24/2010 124854 GRESSER COMPANIES INC. 16,672.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 239114 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 16,672.50 336937 6124/2010 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 3,055.00 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 238914 061610 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,055.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010. 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /,Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit. . 335938 6/24/2010 105639 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO. - 14,573.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 239115 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 14,573.00. 335939 6/2412010 124620 GRIFFIN; SANDRA 58.50 ART WORK SOLD 239063 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART: CENTER REVENUES 58:50 336940 6/24/2010 100166 GRITTON, KAY 50.05 . ARTWORK SOLD 239064,- 061010 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.05 336941 -6/24/2010 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 58.82 PLOTTER PAPER '00005707 238809 269586 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 58.82 - 335942 6/24/2010 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7 /1/10 239151 061710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL- ADMINISTRATION 150.00 336943 6/24/2010 .116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC 60.87 MARKERS, TACKS. -NAILS 00004201 238810 585942 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 60.87 335944 6/24/2010 - 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 72.06 STANDPIPES 00005694 238915 1477815 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 72.06 335946 6/2412010 122987 HEGY1; TAUNYA 49.50, UNIFORM PURCHASE 239152 062110 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.50 335946 6/24/2010 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 224.64 MEAT PATTIES 238916 022520 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL ' 224.64 335947 6/24/2010 106436' HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 116.98 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 238684 21056224 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,274.96 RADIO ADMIN FEE 238811 20058015 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,391.94 R55CKREG LOG20000 6/24/2010 CITY OF EDINA 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page _ 14 MILEAGE / PARKING 239153 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 1240.6107 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335948 612412010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 336960 6/24/2010 122666 HYSER, TIMOTHY 1,232.00 238746 525187 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 363.50 238747 524778 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 505.00 238748 524777 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 335949 6/24/2010 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 406.30 MILEAGE / PARKING 239153 061510 1240.6107 406.30 336960 6/24/2010 122666 HYSER, TIMOTHY 306.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 239136 061710 4077.6103 306.00 335951 6/2412010 125093 ILVONEN, ILONA 54.60 ART WORK SOLD 239065 061010 5101.4413 54.60 336962 6/24/2010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 60.54 PVC, FITTINGS 00005806 238685 609719 5915.6530 60.54 336953 6/2412010 122269 IPROMOTEU INC. 292.36 FIRE HATS 00003745 238812 334459MPT 1470.6406 292.36 336954 6/2412010 124628 J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION 66,228.00 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 238814 8115 -11 4402.6710 66,228.00 336956 6/24/2010 126764 JAEGER, DONNA 56.00 SR GOLF REFUND 239154 061410 1628.6103.02 56.00 336956 6/24/2010 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 206.68 TUBES, POLY TAPE 00005703 238813 99659 1260.6406 206.68 336967 6/24/2010 102167 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 748.00 SAFETY AUDIT 239155 20046262 5310.6103 748.00 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING GOLF PROF SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS ENGINEERING GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page- 15 6118/2010 - 6124/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 335968 6/24/2010 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 6.09 238917 053110 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 33.86 238917 053110 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.76 238917 053110 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 64.39 238917 053110 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 96.23 238917 053110 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 13.98 ART CENTER 238918 MAY2010 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 25.91 ART CENTER 238918 MAY2010 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 52.94 ART CENTER 238918 MAY2010 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 333.16 336969 6/24/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 73.60 238749 1048057 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 71.75 238750 1390389 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 703.40 238919 987872 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,946.07 238971 1399819 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,063.41 238972 1399825 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 98.40 238973 1399826 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 47.60 238974 1399820 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 77.44 238975 1396441 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11,081.67 335960 6/2412010 126739 JOHANSEN, RUTH 25.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 239156 061710 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 25.50 335962 6/24/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 607.57 238976 1853920 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,123.50 238977 1853919 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,251.60 238978 1853918 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,776.39 238979 1853921 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.24 238980 1853908 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 726.58 238981 1853902 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,342.71 238982 1853903 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 214.86 238983 1853904 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 329.82 238984 1853905 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 225.29 238985 1853906 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 210.24 238986 1853917 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,460.76 238987 1853922 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 35.37 238988 1853916 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,940.77 238989 1853915 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .18 238990 1853907 842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 453.13 238991 1853913 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 335.86 238992 1853909 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 853.99 238993 1853914 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,129.13 238994 1853912 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.11 238995 1853911 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,131.48 238996 1853910 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19.40- 238997 461805 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 113.12- 238998 461130 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 62.37- 238999 461615 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20,048.69 336963 6/2412010 123696 JOHNSTON, TOR[ 85.15 ART WORK SOLD 239129 061710 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 85.15 335964 6/24/2010 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 106.40 DEHUMIDIFIER PARTS 00005867 238920 057288 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 106.40 336966 612412010 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 79.78 VACUUM REPAIRS 238815 012820 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 79.78 336966 6/24/2010 118069 JOYCE, CYNTHIA 107.90 ART WORK SOLD 239066 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 107.90 335967 6/24/2010 124192 JPERZEL & ASSOCIATES 192.50 WEBSITE PHOTO GALLERIES 238686 5730 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 192.50 335968 6/24/2010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 337.10 UNIFORMS 00003747 238816 141969 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 147.96 UNIFORMS 00003747 238817 141969 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 179.52 UNIFORMS 00003736 238818 141011 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 28.82 UNIFORMS 00003736 238819 141017 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 290.95 UNIFORMS 00003748 238820 141926 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 26.99 UNIFORMS 00003747 238821 141969 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 579.96 UNIFORMS 00003748 238822 141926 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,591.30 335969 6/24/2010 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.05 SOUND SYSTEM BATTERIES 239157 061610 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 60.05 335970 6/24/2010 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 53.69 MERCHANDISE 239100 2529895 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 53.69 335971 6/2412010 126762 KRENIK, KAREN 3.40 SEASON TICKET REFUND 239158 061710 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 46.60 SEASON TICKET REFUND 239158 061710 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 50.00 335972 6/24/2010 106646 KRUEGER, DOROTHY 50.00 TRIP REFUND 239159 061410 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 50.00 335973 6/24/2010 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 43.48 LOGO CLOTHING 238687 08665017 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 43.48 336974 6/24/2010 124444 LEE, CHELSEA 210.00 CREATE CHALLENGERS PROGRAM 239162 061710 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 210.00 335976 6/24/2010 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 846.00 LIFEGUARD SUITS 238921 INV016925 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 846.00 335976 6/24/2010 100868 LOGIS 1,147.00 238922 32274 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,565.50 238922 32274 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,893.00 238922 32274 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,983.00 238922 32274 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,023.00 238922 32274 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,086.00 238922 32274 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,883.50 238922 32274 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 25,581.00 335977 6/24/2010 102129 LOVEGREEN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 213.24 CONVEYOR BELT REPAIR 239160 95947 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 866.78 CONVEYOR BELT REPLACEMENT 239161 95968 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,080.02 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 335978 6/24/2010 101792 LUBE -TECH 613.27 OIL 00005116 238923 1783308 1553.6581 GASOLINE 5842.5515 1400.6104 1600.6107 1553.6530 1553.6530 5900.2015 5910.6130 5621.6130 5631.6130 1160.6130 5510.6130 5932.6130 5111.6710 1550.6121 1470.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADVERTISING PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 18 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL (BILLING) EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION FINANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 613.27 335979 6/24/2010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 142.56 239000 87865 142.56 335980 6/24/2010 103286 M.T.O.A. 2,520.00 CONFERENCE FEE 239163 061610 2,520.00 336981 6/24/2010 101371 MACHOLDA, ED 113.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 239164 061510 113.50 335982 6/2412010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 55.86 DIRT SHOE SCRAPERS 00005641 238688 2103873 99.22 DIRT SHOE SCRAPERS 00005641 238689 2103874 155.08 335983 6/24/2010 126749 MAHOWALD, SHER 88.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 239165 061610 88.00 335984 6/24/2010 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 500.00 2009 AUDIT 238675 26976 750.00 2009 AUDIT 238675 26976 750.00 2009 AUDIT 238675 26976 1,000.00 2009 AUDIT 236675 26976 1,500.00 2009 AUDIT 238675 26976 2,000.00 2009 AUDIT 238675 26976 6,500.00 335986 6/24/2010 126719 MARLYNZ 85.82 AIR COMPRESSOR/TANK 238924 100525 85.82 336986 6/24/2010 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 800.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT EVALUATIONS 238824 6951 2,400.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 238824 6951 5842.5515 1400.6104 1600.6107 1553.6530 1553.6530 5900.2015 5910.6130 5621.6130 5631.6130 1160.6130 5510.6130 5932.6130 5111.6710 1550.6121 1470.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADVERTISING PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 18 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL (BILLING) EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION FINANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description Business Unit ' 3,200.00 335987 6/2412010 124708 MCLEOD, DOUG 70:00 FFII CERTIFICATION 238823 061510 1470.6104 i CONFERENCES &`SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 335988 6124/2010 104156 MENARDS i 238.84 SUMP PUMP, PAINTING SUPPLIES 00002301 239166 27314 5630.6466-' GENERAL - SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL' LAKES 238.84 335989 - 6/24/2010 100886 METRO SALES INC 1,656:00 COPIER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT -. 238825 .366809 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,656:00 336990 6/24/2010 124301 METRO WEST IRRIGATION AND LAND 81.90 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 238826 8446 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.90 335991 6/24/2010 102508, METZGER; MAURE ANN 67.28 ART WORK SOLD 239067 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART'CENTER REVENUES' 67.28 336992 612412010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 118.75 - PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239116 062510 01376.1705.30 "' CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA--376 MOCCASIN VAL RD RECON 118.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 5° 239116 062510 01375.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -375 BORR RD RECONSTRUCTION 1,358.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1- 239116 062510 03455.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-455 BROR'RD SANITARY 1,567.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239116 062510 03447.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-447 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 3,078.00 PARTIAL' PAYMENT NO. 1 239116' 062510 04368.1705:30 CONTRACTOWPAYMENTS' STS -368 MOCCASIN VALLEY STORM 4,931.93 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239116 062510 01359.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 9,186.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239116 062510 05489.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -489 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 17,839.57 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239116 062510 04354.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -354 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 38,199.50 336993 6/24/2010 100891 MIDWEST.ASPHALTCORP. 27,722.42 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 239117 061110 03449.1705.30' CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-449 PAMELA PARK 45,377.89 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 239117 061110 05492.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -492 PAMELA PARK 156,012.89 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 239117 061110 01360.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 233,839.59 - PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 239117 061110 -04358.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -358 PAMELA PARK 462,952.79 336994 6/24/2010 121124 _MILLER, NANCY 94.25 ART WORK SOLD 239068 061010 ,101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVE! R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 20 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 94.25 335995 612412010 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATIO 260.00 RECERTIFICATION FEES (13) 00003749 238827 20100604104426 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 260.00 335996 6/24/2010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,205.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00005903 238925 33642 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,205.00 335997 6/24/2010 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 OPERATOR RENEWAL LICENSE 238926 061810 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 335998 6/24/2010 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 10.00 GHIN HANDICAPS 238692 45- 0150 -20 -6/10 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 108.00 GHIN HANDICAPS 238693 45- 0150 -21 -6/10 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 323.00 GHIN HANDICAPS 238694 45- 0150 -13- 6/10 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 5,320.00 GHIN HANDICAPS 238695 45- 0150 -16 -6/10 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 5,761.00 336999 6/2412010 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,043.74 CRS II 00001212 238696 61076 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 366.62 ASPHALT EMULSION 00001212 238927 61172 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,410.36 336000 6/24/2010 102396 MDSE, WILLIAM 867.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 239137 061710 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 867.00 336001 6/24/2010 102082 MPLS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COL 140.00 DATA PRIVACY CLASSES 238690 00268763 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 600.00 FIREARMS INSTRUCTION 238691 00268757 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 740.00 336002 6/24/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 501.03 PART FOR NEW SPREADER 00005601 238928 732670 -00 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 501.03 336003 6/24/2010 103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 42.90 RULE BOOKS 00006026 238929 93640 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 42.90 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336004 6124/2010 103007 NELSON, DAVID 159.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 238930 061610 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 159.99 336005 6/24/2010 103632 NEXT DAY GOURMETISUPERIOR PROD 470.25 PIZZA OVENS 00005106 238828 8443508 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 1,566.78 TOASTERS, MICROWAVES 00005106 238829 8443401 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 2,037.03 336006 6/24/2010 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 307.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 239167 062110 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 307.50 336007 6/24/2010 126728 NORTH COUNTRY CONCRETE INC. 33,912.86 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239118 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 33,912.86 336008 6124/2010 102735 NORTH MEMORIAL EMS EDUCATION 190.00 ACLS REFRESHER 238830 3898 1470.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 190.00 336009 6124/2010 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 251.58 PIPE, SQ TUBE 00005650 238697 176727 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 152.91 PIPE 00005652 238931 176878 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 404.49 336010 6/2412010 119357 NORTHERN DEWATERING INC. 2,462.40 RENTAL HOSE 00005467 238932 23696 05506.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 2.462.40 336011 6/24/2010 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 337.04 EARPLUGS, SAFETY GLASSES 00003753 238831 P272803400018 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 337.04 336012 6/24/2010 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 11,935.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239119 062510 03451.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS451 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 23,145.32 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239119 062510 05494.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 32,121.37 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239119 062510 04368.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -368 MOCCASIN VALLEY STORM 128,552.62 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239119 062510 01362.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 195,755.11 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2010 -6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 336013 6/24/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 22.25 ARTISTS OIL, CANVAS PANELS 00009219 238933 38972100 5120.5510 22.25 336014 6124/2010 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 13,127.50 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 238832 #13 4402.6710 13,127.50 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 22 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 336016 6/2412010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 59.63 PAPER 00006034 238698 1223457465 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 13.83 NOTE CARDS 00006034 238699 1221590528 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 73.46 336016 6/24/2010 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 22.30 239168 W10050616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.30 239168 W10050616 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 44.60 239168 W10050616 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 44.60 239168 W10050616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 66.90 239168 W10050616 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 80.85 239168 W10050616 5311.6188 -TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 89.20 239168 W10050616 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 89.20 239168 W10050616 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 111.50 239168 W10050616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.27 239168 W10050616 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 133.80 239168 W10050616 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 154.71 239168 W10050616 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 199.86 239168 W10050616 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 199.87 239168 W10050616 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 312.20 239168 W10050616 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 353.74 239169 W10050622 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 2,044.90 336017 6/24/2010 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 78.00 ART WORK SOLD 239130 061710 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 336018 6/24/2010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 33.65 CHAIN 00005654 238934 597107 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.32 CABLE HARDWARE 00005812 238935 596371 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE 63.81 NYLON ROPE 239170 597117 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 125.78 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 23 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336019 6/24/2010 126729 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC. 7,802.94 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239120 062510 01374.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF 10,329.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239120 062510 01361.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -361 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 10,688.09 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239120 062510 04359.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -359 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 11,339.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239120 062510 05493.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -493 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 12,768.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239120 062510 04371.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -371 INTERLACHEN BLUFF 15,086.61 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239120 062510 03458.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS -458 INTERLACHEN BLUFF 25,071.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 239120 062510 03450.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS -450 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 93,086.03 336020 6124/2010 102440 PASS, GRACE 100.75 ART WORK SOLD 239131 061710 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 100.75 336021 6/24/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 947.29 238751 8264132 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,118.25 238752 8264124 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 31.00 238753 8263117 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 206.50 - 238754 8263474 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,193.75 239001 8264134 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,083.79 336022 6/24/2010 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 514.08 238937 61933623 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 968.92 236938 61933674 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,483.00 336023 6/2412010 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,390.00 EXCAVATING AT NEW PW BLDG 238833 55 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 1,285.00 SPREAD SOIL, FINE GRADE BERM 238834 52 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 2,470.00 REPLACE FOLIAGE 238835 54 01236.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A -236 W70TH LANDSCAPING 167.50 PLANT LILACS 238836 53 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 2,465.00 MULCH 00005847 238936 56 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 7,777.50 336024 6/24/2010 119372 PETSMART #463 94.38 K9 SUPPLIES 00003099 239171 T -9060 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 94.38 336026 6/24/2010 103512 PETTY CASH 17.71- PETTY CASH 238939 061610 1400.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 PETTY CASH 238939 061610 400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENF R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 41.78 PETTY CASH 238939 061610 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.44 PETTY CASH 238939 061610 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.02 PETTY CASH 238939 061610 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 449.47 PETTY CASH 238939 061610 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 644.00 336027 6/2412010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 189.55 238755 2921368 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 899.29 239002 2924250 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 360.38 239003 2924246 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,669.87 239004 2924248 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324.36 239005 2924249 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 207.26 239006 2924244 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,812.95 239007 2924243 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 435.94 239008 2924245 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,569.55 239009 2924253 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 310.77 239010 2924247 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,198.23 239011 2924251 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,614.34 239012 2924252 5862.5512 ; COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15.99- 239013 3438312 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.00- 239014 3438265 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.00- 239015 3438608 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.00- 239016 3438708 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.40- 239017 3438793 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.60- 239018 3438792 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.40- 239019 3438707 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 40.00- 239020 3438706 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 28.48- 239021 3438705 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.44- 239022 3438709 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14,397.18 336028 6124/2010 336029 6/24/2010 100119 PING 212.57 MERCHANDISE 212.57 119146 PLYMAT, AMY 91.65 ART WORK SOLD 91.65 239101 10250370 239132 061710 5440.5511 5101.4413 336030 6/2412010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 391.58 TIRES, MOUNTING 00005810 238700 590490 1553.6530 568.62 TIRES 00005759 238701 599914 1553.6583 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS TIRES & TUBES ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 25 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description ' Business Unit 960.20 336031 6/24/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 4,984.97. ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 239172 061510 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 4,984.97 336032 6/24/2010 126979 PRECISE MRM LLC 64.13 PILOT FEE FOR GPRS UA• 238837 300704 5913.6406` GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 64.13 336033.- 6/24/2010 .124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC. 207.05. ENVELOPES 238702, 056437 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 207.05 - 336034 6/24/2010 122061. PRESTIGE BUILDERS OF MINNESOTA 11520.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 239121 062510 4402.1705.30 .- CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 1,520.00 336035 6/24/2010 126730 PROGRESSIVE,BUILDING SYSTEMS y 204,250.00' PARTIAL PAYMENT, NO. 1 239122 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 204,250.00 336036 6/2412010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,008.58 STRIPPER, FLOOR FINISH 00002300 239173 4745 - 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 653.74 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00002300 239174 4754 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,662.32 336037- 6/24/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE' - 129.60 238756 318931 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 351.69 238757 318756 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 749.90 238758 317865 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,618.69 " 238759 318644 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,490.76 238760 318642 -00 5842.5512 COST'OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,811.51 - 238761 317863 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.00 238762 317864 -CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 689.80 238763 318754 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 133.60- 238764 316401 -00 5822.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 159.20. 239023 319587 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,654.42 239024 318643 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,023.52 239025 318930 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING '465.60 239026 318755 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 110.00 239027 317866 -CO '822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 26 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 11.33- 239028 317648 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,166.76 336038 6124/2010 103930 QUIST, SUSAN 49.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 238940 061710 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.98 336039 6124/2010 123898 QWEST 58.14 952 944 -1841 238838 1841 -6/10 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 76.60 952 835 -1474 238839 1474 -6/10 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 135.55 952 285 -2951 238840 2951 -6/10 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 288.01 952 944 -6522 ATM 238941 6522 -6/10 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 558.30 336040 6124/2010 124637 RALPH, ROBERT 382.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 239138 061710 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 382.50 336041 6/2412010 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 483.08 MAIL WATER BILLS 238942 4187 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 483.08 336042 6/24/2010 126936 REINDERS 748.13 GRASS SEED 00005838 238943 3004694 -00 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 748.13 336043 6/24/2010 126363 RELUMINATE INC. 766.00 BALLAST REWIRE 238841 17287 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION 01 RENOVATION 766.00 336044 6124/2010 119864 RHINO 412.86 MH MARKERS 00005679 238944 34864 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 412.86 336045 6/24/2010 119766 RICCI, PATRICE 139.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 239139 061710 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 139.50 336046 6/24/2010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 102.73 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 236842 00236208 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 102.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/1812010 - 612412010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336047 6/24/2010 124809 RPU INC. 843.34 ASPHALT & CONCRETE WORK 238843 1105 04366.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -366 JEFF PLACE SUMP DRAIN 843.34 336048 6/24/2010 126746 RYAN, PATRICK 75.00 JR GOLF LEAGUE REFUND 239175 061810 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES GOLF REVENUES 75.00 336049 6/24/2010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 181.45 101: "" "9350 238945 061410 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 74.01 101 "" "'9350 238946 061610 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 255.46 336050 6/24/2010 118168 SANSIO 761.61 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 238844 INV017517 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 53.44 EMS FAX FEE 236845 INV017390 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 815.05 336051 6/24/2010 126723 SAVAGEAU, DAVID & ROBIN 5,700.00 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISTION 239176 120 - 020-040 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE 5,700.00 336052 6/2412010 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 152.83 NAILS, STAKES 00005796 238703 40846930 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 16.65 LUMBER 00005417 238704 40837434 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 124.62 LUMBER 00005504 238705 40840209 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 44.11 LUMBER, NAILS 00005532 238706 40841377 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 338.21 336053 6/24/2010 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 408.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 239140 061710 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 408.00 336054 6/24/2010 112173 SCHMECHEL, JANE 163.00 CLASS REFUND 239177 061610 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 163.00 336055 6/24/2010 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 435.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 238707 061610 ., 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 435.00 336056 6/2412' 100995 SEH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 28 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,730.15 70TH ST LANDSCAPING 238846 231568 01241.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -241 WEST 70TH LANDSCAPING 2,730.15 336057 6/24/2010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 109.20 ART WORK SOLD 239069 061010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 109.20 336058 6124/2010 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 442.25 PAINT 00005331 238708 0122 -8 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 221.13 PAINT 00005347 238709 0227 -5 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 663.38 336059 6/24/2010 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 432.32 ALARM MONITORING 238847 73625495 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 432.32 336060 6/24/2010 100629 SMITH, AMY 379.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 239178 061810 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 379.50 336061 6/24/2010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 112.45 ART WORK SOLD 239133 061510 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 112.45 336062 6/24/2010 104672 SPRINT 439.89 CARD READERS 238848 312188813 -030 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 439.89 336063 6/24/2010 101004 BPS COMPANIES 7.22 DRAIN VALVE OOOD5835 238947 S2214916.001 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 171.75 PLUMBING PARTS 00005837 238948 S2215802.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 178.97 336064 6/24/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 775.68 MUFFLER, SPRINGS, DAMPER 00005077 238710 S178752 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.75 TUBE ASSEMBLY 00005656 238711 SI79198 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 879.43 336065 6/24/2010 126767 STARR, CORINNE 22.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING REFUND 239179 060810 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 MERCHANDISE 239102 442806 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 40.29 MERCHANDISE 239103 442992 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 107.97 336074 6/24/2010 120695 T- MOBILE 6118/2010 — 6124/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336066 6/24/2010 380007460384 121569 STOCKER EXCAVATING CO. 060410 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 41.33 1,719.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 239123 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS YORK OCCUPANCY 41.34 1,719.50 238713 060410 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 336067 6/2412010 121569 STOCKER EXCAVATING CO. 336071 6/24/2010 6,650.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 239124 0625 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 8.89 6,650.00 239180 27574 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 336066 6/24/2010 101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 336072 6/2412010 2,000.00 2ND HALF MEMBERSHIP 238712 061710 1506.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000.00 336069 6/24/2010 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 29 Business Unit PW BUILDING SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 67.68 MERCHANDISE 239102 442806 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 40.29 MERCHANDISE 239103 442992 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 107.97 336074 6/24/2010 120695 T- MOBILE 42.13 336070 6/24/2010 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 052710 1260.6188 42.13 41.33 380007460384 238713 060410 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 41.33 380007460384 238713 060410 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 41.34 380007460384 238713 060410 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 124.00 336071 6/24/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 8.89 PHONE MAINTENANCE 239180 27574 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8.89 336072 6/2412010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 5862.5514 336073 6/2412010 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 778.83 MOVIES IN THE PARK 238949 RG1450398 5631.6136 778.83 336074 6/24/2010 120695 T- MOBILE 42.13 477067648 238849 052710 1260.6188 42.13 336076 6124/2010 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 488.40 238950 595135 5421.5514 210.00 238951 00771372 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 30 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 698.40 336076 6/24/2010 101474 TITLEIST 1,462.18 MERCHANDISE 239104 1695767 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.32 239105 1626701 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 261.60 239106 1700767 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 129.75 239107 1740829 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,955.85 336077 6/24/2010 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 1,780.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 238952 25304 5820.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 50TH STREET GENERAL 2,220.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 238952 25304 5840.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,220.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 238952 25304 5860.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 6,220.00 336078 6/24/2010 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 69,581.22 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 239125 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 69,581.22 336079 6/2412010 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 286.69 MULCH, SEED 00005516 238953 22982 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 286.69 336080 6/2412010 100363 U.S. BANK 800.00 ULTRASOUND TRAINING 239181 061810 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,157.87 RESCUE RESPONSE GEAR 239181 061810 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,957.87 336081 6/24/2010 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 511.72 BLADES, STRAPS, BITS 00005515 238954 88035931 -001 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 511.72 336082 6/24/2010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 169.51 GAUGE, BOTTLE 00005883 238956 170551 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 169.51 336083 6/2412010 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 293.03 PAGERS 238715 T0319246F 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 293.03 336084 6/2412010 100060 USPS- HASLER 1,000.00 TMS# 202739 238955 061610 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 6/24/2010 102899 ;.VERMEER SALES & SERVICE CITY OF EDINA .120627 VISTAR CORPORATION - 20,373.59 BRUSH CHIPPER 00005602 238959 Council Check Register - 681:25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 20,373.59 28394324 166.61 CLEANING SUPPLIES 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 6124/2010 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CART RENTAL 00006023 238716' 1,000.00 290.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 00006023 336085 6/24/2010 1226641 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 1,340.00 173.55 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003649 238850 195452 1470.6516 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 69.01 OXYGEN 00003649 238851 825291 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 242.56 336091 336086 6/24/2010 119454 .,V I NOCO PIA 101068 :VAN PAPER CO. 101.73 TOWELS, SOAP. 00007512 238957 161661 -00 5861.6201' LAUNDRY " 66.22 CUP LIDS 238958 162326 -01 5421.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 167.95 336087 6/24/2010 102970 .VERIZON WIRELESS 239182 2413556727 1400.6188 336088, 6/24/2010 102899 ;.VERMEER SALES & SERVICE 3_36092 6/24/2010 .120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 20,373.59 BRUSH CHIPPER 00005602 238959 - E01725 - 681:25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 20,373.59 28394324 166.61 CLEANING SUPPLIES 336089 6124/2010 .620.88 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 239184 28412415 1,538.85 1,050.00 CART RENTAL 00006023 238716' ,48238 290.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 00006023 239183 48430 1,340.00 336090 6/24/2010 101786 :VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICES .267:00 SET -UP AND CHECK CAMERA 00001004 238960 i4984 267:00 336091 6/2412010 119454 .,V I NOCO PIA 421650.6710 5423.6216 5423:6216 1552.6103 104.00 239029 0026897 -IN 5862.5513 ' 104.00 3_36092 6/24/2010 .120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 70.11' CLEANING SUPPLIES. 238717 28394324 - 681:25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 238717 28394324 166.61 CLEANING SUPPLIES 239184 28412415 .620.88 CONCESSION PRODUCT 239184 28412415 1,538.85 336093 6/24/2010 124969 W. L. HALL COMPANY 10,555.45 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 239126 062510 5311.6511 5320.5510 5311.6511 5320.5510 1402.1705.30 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 31 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT.'GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT LEASE LINES GOLF CARS LEASE LINES GOLF CARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CLEANING.SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page - 32 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10,555.45 336094 6/2412010 124866 WASCHE COMMERCIAL FINISHES INC 54,863.45 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 239127 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 54,863.45 336095 6/2412010 126764 WILLIAMS, KELLER 22.71 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 239185 061710 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 22.71 336096 6/24/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 160.20 238766 245004 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 525.90 239030 245005 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 967.57 239031 245101 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,653.67 336097 6/24/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,572.12 239032 321501 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 42.47 239033 321499 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 169.88 239034 321498 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,913.99 239035 321500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 182.24 239036 321497 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 31.00- 239037 48688 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 388.48- 239038 48689 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105.12- 239039 48687 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 102.00- 239040 48939 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.00- 239041 48883 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16.00- 239042 48882 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 23.67- 239043 48881 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.50- 239044 48886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17.50- 239045 48885 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.34- 239046 48884 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,170.09 336098 6/24/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 74.67 238767 414300 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 658.43 238768 414299 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 9,316.93 238769 414303 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 121.29 238770 414304 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,496.55 238771 414302 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 392.90 238772 414193 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,080.08 238773 411090 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6123/2010 9:24:57 Council Check Register Page- 33 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 435.60 238774 412746 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.13 238775 411088 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 290.75- 238776 803663 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 81.15- 238777 803662 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,799.78 239047 414296 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,626.37 239048 414295 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,856.20 239049 412745 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,520.97 239050 414298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,558.45 239051 414301 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 188.15- 239052 803628 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 145.10- 239053 803150 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 29,322.20 336099 6/24/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 464.00 238718 619649 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 103.20 238778 619912 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,905.42 238779 619911 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 238780 619910 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,731.00 238781 620201 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,398.45 238782 620780 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.00 239054 622423 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 224.00 239055 622422 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,973.85 239056 622421 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,859.95 336100 6/24/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,085.40 238783 249705 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 837.55 238784 249622 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,371.30 239057 249716 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,294.25 336101 6/24/2010 106740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 13,189.50 70TH ST DESIGN 238852 4- 01686 -160 01367.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 1,608.00 TRAFFIC ENG REVIEW 238853 28 -01686 -020 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 14,797.50 336102 6/2412010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 3,094.19 51- 5619094 -8 238854 241647783 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,709.28 51- 5888961 -7 238855 241659512 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 309.38 51 -4197645 -8 238856 241613647 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3,027.71 51- 6227619 -3 238857 242229440 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 11,140.56 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/18/2010 — 6/24/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336103 6/2412010 124960 ZAHL - PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE 12,350.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 239128 062510 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 12,350.00 336104 6/24/2010 101091 ZIEGLER INC 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 238719 E6395915 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 450.00 2,748,833.68 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 2,748,833.68 Total Payments 2,748,833.68 6/23/2010 9:24:57 Page - 34 Business Unit PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/18/2010 - 6/24/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 156,278.61 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 5,395.41 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,420,855.15 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 24,712.11 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,699.38 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 154.71 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 8,942.97 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 28,573.93 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 408,426.01 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 9,766.39 05800 LIQUOR FUND 144,447.61 05900 UTILITY FUND 210,331.72 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 324,249.68 Report Totals 2,748,833.68 We confirm to the se claims knowledge and belief. that the comply in all material respects with the requirements of the C''ty of Edina purchasing p ?GF es �nd /I 6/2312010 9:25:53 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Check # Date 336107 7/1/2010 336108 7/1/2010 336109 71112010 336110 7/1/2010 336111 7/112010 336112 711/2010 598.50 336113 711/2010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 264.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 264 .00 239432 062410 5110.6103 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS. CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOD & BLACK DIRT 6/29/2010.11:36:29 Page- 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER, BLDG /MAINT DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Council Check Register CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL- SERVICES GENERAL 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 118536 A 8 B A_ UTO ELECTRIC INC. - 149.63 MOTOR 00005756 239187 57431 1553.6530 87.81 SOLENOID 00005756 239188 57430 1553.6530 237.44 101833 A.T.O.M. 40.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 239189 21696030 1400.6104 40.00 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 75.01- BLACK DIRT 00005834 239190 33724 5111.6103 270.02 SOD, DIRT 00001917 239264 33713 5913.6543 .345.03 126819 ABRAKADOODLE 225.00 FAMILY FEST 7 /11/10 239465 061010 5631.6136 225.00 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 523.70 HRA ADMIN' 239466 0014374 -IN 1550.6103 152.00. INS ADMIN 239467 0014481 -IN 1550.6103 523.70 HRAADMIN - 239468 0015199 -IN 1550.6103 157.00 INS ADMIN 239469 0015292 -IN 1550.6103 1,356.40 102971 -ACE ICE COMPANY 32.00 239326 0333368 5822.5515 62.80 239327 0723960 5862.5515 73.80 239328 0806423 5862.5515 95.90 239329 .0333369 5862.5515 40.40 239330 0806320 5862.5515 37.00 239331 0606421 5822.5515 60.00 239332 0806428 5842.5515 51.80 239538 0724011 5862.5515 58.40 239770 0724012 5842.5515 86.40 239771 0333370 5842.5515 598.50 336113 711/2010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 264.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 264 .00 239432 062410 5110.6103 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS. CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOD & BLACK DIRT 6/29/2010.11:36:29 Page- 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER, BLDG /MAINT DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL- SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON.SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF FOINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/1/2010 - 7/112010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336114 711/2010 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 288.00 GIFT SHOP HELP 239433 062410 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 288.00 336115 7/112010 126826 ANDERSON, CHRISTI 40.00 SWIMSUIT DAMAGE 239709 062210 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 40.00 336116 7/1/2010 124433 ANDERSON, MARLYN J 54.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239434 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 236.04 BUILDING SUPPLIES 239710 062310 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 290.04 336117 711/2010 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 759.78 FOOD 239470 1376407 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 759.78 336118 71112010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 268.63 COFFEE 239265 416700 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 268.63 336119 711/2010 120995 AVR INC. 444.60 CONCRETE 00001211 239638 32272 1646.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 666.90 CONCRETE 00001211 239639 32738 1646.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,111.50 336120 711/2010 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 160.99 REPROGRAM CAMERA 239471 3314 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.99 336121 7/1/2010 124499 BACH, MARCIA 4.00 REIMBURSEMENT 239711 062410 1623.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TENNIS INSTRUCTION 58.24 REIMBURSEMENT 239711 062410 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 62.24 336122 7/1/2010 100638 BACHMAN'S 121.76 BARRELS 239712 11483475 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 121.76 336123 711/2010 100642 BANNERS TO GO 71.14 PARK SIGNS 00005953 239640 30261 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 71.14 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 7/1/2010 - 711/2010 Check '# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336124 7/1/2010 121083 BARR, FRANK 503.75 ART WORK SOLD 239372 062110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 503.75 33.6126 7/112010 102449• BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 1,088:44 BATTERIES _ 00005760 239191 2984 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 10.00- CREDIT 239,266 7/509 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,078.44 336126 7/1 @010 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,251.13 239333 53712700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 759.05 239334 53712600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 21:00 239335 53712500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,331.60 239336 53716300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING " 18.09. 239337 53722600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,767.55 239338 53716200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 297.95 239339 5946200 5862.5515 - COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 96.47 239340 83796200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 168.36 239341 83795800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 52.23 .239342 83796000 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 645.80 239539 53642000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 396.30 239540 53800900 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH, ST SELLING 431.10 239541 53794200 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 115.73 239542 83829000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,941.27. 239772 53794300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,269.68 239773 53800700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 102.76 239774 83829300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10,666.07 336127 7/112010 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 759.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239435 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 759.00 336128 7/1/2010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 8.75 PENS 239373 WO- 629042 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 84.17 MAILING LABELS 239374, WO- 627140 -1 5842.6122 ADVERTISING, OTHER YORK SELLING 77.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 239641 OE- 229538 -1 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 170.06 336129 7/1/2010 119679 -.BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 94.34 TOILET SERVICE 00005957 239642 21269 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCF R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 4 7/1/2010 — 711/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 94.34 336130 7/1/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 274.22 BOXES, LABELS 00001024 239472 60754 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 274.22 336131 7/112010 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 258.45 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003751 239643 87158242 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 258.45 336132 7/1/2010 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 422.00 239775 99765 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 422.00 336133 7/1/2010 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 116.00 LUNCHEON REFRESHMENTS 239473 1918 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 116.00 336134 7/1/2010 126836 BROPHY, ROBERT 110.00 TENNIS LESSONS REFUND 239713 062110 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 110.00 336136 7/1/2010 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 200.00 FAMILY FEST 7 /11110 239462 060710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 336136 711/2010 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 4,711.17 ASPHALT 00001210 239192 8074MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 7,490.78 ASPHALT 00001210 239193 8066MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 12,201.95 336137 71112010 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 226.89 MERCHANDISE 239714 921439047 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 226.89 336138 7/112010 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 128.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 239436 062410 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239436 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 308.00 336139 711/2010 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,141.55 239390 11152 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 5 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #. Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 29.30 239391 11150 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2930 239392 11146 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 703.10 239543 11148 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,903.25 336140 7/1/2010 117372 CAREFREE LAWN 119.00 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00005915 239644 0031417 -IN 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 119.00 336141 7/1/2010 126832 CARLETON, PHIL 77.00 CLASS REFUND 239715 062310 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES ^ 77.00 33.6142 7/1/2010 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 65.00 PROGRAM REGISTER_ 239645 062310 5320.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL CONCESSIONS 214.00 REGISTER PAPER 239645 062310 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 279.00 336143 7/1/2010 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10.50 5584310 -6 239646 5584310 - 6-6/10 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER - 391.94 5584304 -9 239647 5584304 -96/10 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY ' 402.44 336144 7/1/2010 119661 CENTRAL.ENVELOPE CORPORATION 250.53 INVITATIONS 239267 68389 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 250.53 336145 7/112010 126829 CENTURY PLUMBING INC. 116.56 PERMIT REFUND 239716 ED098385 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 116.56 336146 7/1/2010 116363 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 252.49 PUBLIC HEARING ENVELOPES 239474 27292 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 252.49 336147 7/1/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 420.80 239544 420891 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 420.80 336148 7/1/2010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 210.02 00113607 -0170005201 239194 170005201 -6/10 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 289.72 00079303 - 0155300018 239195 155300018 -6110 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER' ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 336149 . 7/112010 336160 7/1/2010 Amount Supplier /Explanation P 44.96 00079303- 0155300009 0 72.68 00102561 -0112920000 80.10 00110793-0155250018 44.96 ' 00110793 -0173001001 3,448.06 00110793 -0155200000 44.96 00110793-0155250009 44.96 01)110793 -0173001000 329.54 .00103650 - 0155252016. 19.62 00103650- 0155251008 501.14 00103650-0155251026. 5,130.72 123941 CLAY, CAROL 150.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 150.00 116304 CLAY, DON 210.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 210.00 239437 062410 239438 062410 5110.6103 5125.6103 336161 CITY OF EDINA 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. Council Check Register 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 1,112.90 O # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 0008069 239196 155300009 -6/10 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 239197 112920000 -6/10 5841.6189 SEWER .& WATER 239648 155250018 -6/10 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 239649 0173001001 -6/10 5210.6189 SEWER &WATER 239650 155200000 -6/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 239651' 155250009 -6/10. 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 239652 173001000- 6/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 239653 155252016 -6/10 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 239654 155251008 -6/10 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 239655 155251026 -0 /10 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 239437 062410 239438 062410 5110.6103 5125.6103 336161 7/1/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 1,112.90 239545 0138089410 5862.5515 1,112.90 336162 7/1/2010 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 264.78 ASPHALT 00001222 239268 061510 5913.6518 264.78 336153 7/1/2010 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING.& CORING INC. 548.00 CONCRETE CHAIN, :00005905 239269 45947 5913.6406 - 548.00 336164 7/1/2010 101974 CONNIE'S CATERING . 2,595.84 EMPLOYEE, LUNCHEON 239475 061610 1500.6103 2,595.84 336166 7/1/2010 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL - 1,308.00 WORKERS COMP. 239476 1476716 1470.6045 - 1,308.00 336166 71112010 116366 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC. 230.61 CONCRETE TOOLS 00005851 239656 452241 1647.6406 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BLACKTOP GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/29/2010.11:36:29 Page- 6 Business Unit . ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS YORK OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO VERNON SELLING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION I PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. CONTINGENCIES WORKERS COMPENSATION. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page- 7 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL -STORM SEWER ARENA.BLDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL 66.30 239343 556365 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA 41181.40 R55CKREG LOG20000 556366 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,017.55 239393 557232 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING . 44.80 Council Check Register 557231 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 44,80 239395 °' 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX. Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 239776 557228 230.61 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 239271 491369 1553.6556 336157 7/112010 239272 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH 1553.6530 58.44- CREDIT 239480 485906 384.75 CONCRETE TOP SECTION 00005911. 239477 S000020216 5932.6520 CONCRETE 336163 7/1/2010 100720- 'DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 669.04 CONCRETE TOP SECTIONS 00005916 239657 S000020262 5932.6520 CONCRETE. 336630 5421.5510 1,053.79 BAKERY 239482 336725 5421.5510 336158 71112010 104020 DALCO 195.32 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008064 239375 2221986 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 343.69 WIPES, GLOVES, SPONGES -. 00005795 239658 -. 2217513 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 539.01 336169 7/1/2010 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 119.76 DAIRY 239478 060310 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD .119.76 336160 711/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page- 7 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL -STORM SEWER ARENA.BLDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL 66.30 239343 556365 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 41181.40 239344 556366 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,017.55 239393 557232 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING . 44.80 239394 557231 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 44,80 239395 °' 557229 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX. 50TH ST SELLING 2,931.30 239546 557230 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS "SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,500.52- 239776 557228 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 36.00 239777 558009 5842.5514 16,822.67 336161 71112010 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY ' 245.86 609425 WATER 239479 7016959 5311.6406 245.86 336162 7/112010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 32.08 PLIERS 239198 487682 1553.6556 90.93 RATCHETS 00005657 239270 491344 1553.6556 17.65 MINI TORCH 00005657 239271 491369 1553.6556 1.54 BIT 00005374 239272 486549 1553.6530 58.44- CREDIT 239480 485906 1553.6556 83.76 336163 7/1/2010 100720- 'DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 51.46 BAKERY 239481 336630 5421.5510 129.40 BAKERY 239482 336725 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS TOOLS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 311.28 CITY OF EDINA 336166 7/1/2010 Council Check Register 121268 DIRR, ALEX 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 200.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 82.21 BAKERY 239483 336740 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 52.97 BAKERY 239484 336974 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 43.52 BAKERY 239485 337070 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 359.56 5,036.84 336164 7/1/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 336167 7/1/2010 139.40 650487671 239376 650487671 -6/10 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 96.80 MERCHANDISE 239717 650243624 -6/10 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 25.02 51.57 239768 110312148 -6/10 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 25.03 239768 110312148 -6/10 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 25.03 336168 239768 110312148 -6/10 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 5111.6103 5915.6586 5440.5511 5440.5511 1428.6010 1629.6406 5912.6406 1551.6406 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page- 8 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION WELL HOUSES CITY HALL GENERAL 311.28 336166 7/1/2010 121268 DIRR, ALEX 200.00 PT MAINTENANCE 239439 062410 200.00 336166 711/2010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 5,036.84 CHEMICALS 00001215 239273 82700817 -10 5,036.84 336167 7/1/2010 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,198.02 MERCHANDISE 239718 439565 51.57 MERCHANDISE 239719 438490 1,249.59 336168 7/1/2010 106224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 3,430.00 EDINA ART FAIR 239377 062210 3,430.00 336169 7/1/2010 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 105.00 GYM RENTAL - PERMIT #35643 239199 9612 105.00 336170 7/1/2010 126804 EER PRODUCTS INC. 2,927.31 DEHUMIDIFIER 00005901 239200 6215 2,927.31 336171 711/2010 126806 ELECTRONIC CENTER - 2.50 SWITCH 00005891 •239201 693117 2.50 5111.6103 5915.6586 5440.5511 5440.5511 1428.6010 1629.6406 5912.6406 1551.6406 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page- 8 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION WELL HOUSES CITY HALL GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 R55CKREG_ LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336172 711/2010 101966 EMERGENCY. APPARATUS MAINTENANC 985.22 T -90 REPAIRS 239659. 49392 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 985.22 336173 7/1.12010 104733,. EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 603.22 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003711 239660 1283183 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 603.22 336174 711/2010 100752 , ESSBROTHERS & SONS`INC. - 5,310.62 RISER RINGS 00005701 239274 NN1597 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 5,310.62 336176 711/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 162.64 ALTERNATOR 00005661 239202 69- 013381 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 573.30 PADS, ROTORS, FILTERS 00001043 239275 69- 013512 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 82.08 SHOCK ABSORBER 00001043 239276 1- 3384967 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 390.55 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS 00001039 239486 69- 013497 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.49 JOINT KITS, 00001045 239487 69- 013549 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS,_ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.351.06 336176 7/1/2010 122649 FA_RNER- BOCKEN COMPANY 536.50 FOOD 239488 7370151 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 54.18- CREDIT 239489 7309351 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 482.32 336177 7/1/2010 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,648.95 PIPE - 00001028 239203 S01254607.001 05506.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WiP #3 3,557.18 SERVICE LINE FITTINGS 00005897 239490 S01256409.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 6,206.13 336178 7/1/2010 102360, FIRE SPECIALTIES COMPANY 316.69 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003752 239661 11403 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 316.69 336179 7/1/2010 119211 FIRSTLAB 269.00 DRUG TESTING 239491 00256881 1550.6121 ADVERTISINGiPERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 269.00 336180 711/2010 100769 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 1,221.73 LOCK CORES 00005790 239204 204925 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,221.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page- 10 7/1/2010 - 711/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336181 7/1/2010 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 975.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239440 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 975.00 336182 7/1/2010 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 972.43 MERCHANDISE 239720 11392906 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 759.36 MERCHANDISE 239721 40411299 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 548.46 MERCHANDISE 239722 11397559 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,280.25 336183 7/1/2010 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 133.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239441 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 133.00 336184 7/1/2010 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239442 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240.00 336185 7/112010 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 205.97 K -9 LETTERING 239492 70319 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 205.97 336186 7/1/2010 101103 GRAINGER 7.76 GRAFFITI REMOVER 00005885 239205 9274521146 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 362.96 AIR COMPRESSOR, BLOWER 00006435 239206 9265535675 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 105.15 HEX WRENCHES, AMP METER 00005904 239277 9279265533 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 326.05 SMOKING STATIONS 00005895 239278 9277270246 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 41.87 LABEL TAPE 00005870 239662 9272314460 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 92.44 TOGGLE SWITCH 00005872 239663 9272695108 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 21.44 RAIL CLAMP 00006436 239664 9270925507 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 319.92 GREENHOUSE TOOLS 00005886 239665 9275325497 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 1,277.59 336187 7/112010 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 248.00 239548 00025221 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 248.00 336188 7/1/2010 120201 GRANICUS INC. 829.64 WEBSTREAMING - JULY 239279 19678 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 336189 711/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 11 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 414.75 239549. 119985 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 280.75 239550 120023 5822.5513 COST OF•GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 695.50 336190 7/1/2010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 113.55 CLEANING, SUPPLIES, TOOL KIT ''. 239723.. 062510 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 113.55 336191 7/1/2010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 154.15 FIELD LIGHTS ' 00005887 239666 948160083 1642.6406 GENERAL SUP, PLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 37.69 BULBS -_ 00005887 239724 948186874 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 128.22 BULBS 00002304 239725 947987069 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 320.06 336192 7/112010 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 4,352.00 GOLF LESSONS 239493 062310 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF'ADMINISTRATION 11,995.00 GOLF LESSONS 239493- 062310 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF. GOLF ADMINISTRATION 16, 347.00 336193 7/112010 162426 HALE, WILLIAM. 250.00 _. FAMILY FEST 7 /11/10 239461 060710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 250.00 336194 7/1/2010 101387 HAPPY FACES 360.00 FAMILY FEST 7111/10 239464 060710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 360.00 336195 711/2010 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 1,125.00 BATS,AND HATS 239494 062210 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,125.00 336196 711/2010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 11729.07 POOL CHEMICALS 239667 3131021 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,729.07 336197 711/2010 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN -15.00 SUPPLIES 239443 062410 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 75.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 239443 062410 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 90.00 336198 7/112010 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 156.93 CS. KEYS 00005698 239280 1496671 5913:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/1/2010 — 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES BOARD & ROOM PRISONER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6/29/2u 10 11:36:29 Page - 12 Business Unit GRILL ENGINEERING GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION LINE MARKING POWDER CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 156.93 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 336199 7/1/2010 101676 HEGGIES PIZZA 75.00 PIZZA 239495 1704598 5421.5510 75.00 336200 7/1/2010 101603 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS 100.00 TRUST ACCT FOR EASEMENT DOCS 239726 062510 1260.6406 100.00 336201 7/1/2010 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,664.70 MAY 2010 ROOM & BOARD 239207 20105 - EDINA 1195.6225 3,664.70 336202 7/1/2010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 1,173.49 COMPUTERS 00004333 239208 47763465 1554.6710 2,007.12 ENGINEERING PCS 00004335 239281 47778495 1554.8710 4,869.23 ACCESSNIDEO SERVER 00004334 239282 47786919 4402.6710 8,049.84 336203 7/1/2010 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7 /8/10 239459 060110 5631.6136 150.00 336204 7/1/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 832.02 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005183 239668 87456 1642.6544 832.02 336206 7/112010 100806 HOBART CORP 482.61 DISHWASHER REPAIR 239496 25439236 5421.6180 482.61 336206 7/112010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 360.50 239345 525164 5862.5514 1,292.00 239551 525874 5842.5514 466.50 239552 525849 5822.5514 364.00 239553 525873 5862.5514 2,483.00 336207 711/2010 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9.84 NAILS 239378 8014543 01362.1705.31 9.84 NAILS 239378 8014543 01374.1705.31 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES BOARD & ROOM PRISONER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6/29/2u 10 11:36:29 Page - 12 Business Unit GRILL ENGINEERING GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION LINE MARKING POWDER CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 711/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9.86 NAILS 239378. 8014543 01361.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -361 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 29.54 336208 7/1/2010 126176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 2,975.00 PREMIUM' 239497 79086 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,975.00 33.620.9 7/1/2010 112297 HYMARK ELECTRIC INC. 4,000:00 WIRING / VFD.FOR NEW PUMP 00005909 239498 Q0981 -EDINA 5921.6180 CONTRACTED 'REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 4,000.00 336210 7/1/2010 112628 : -ACEE COMPANY,,THE' 1,178.98 CONCESSION PRODUCT 239209 537603 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,178.98 336211 7/1/2010 102223 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC 85.87 MERCHANDISE 239727 802241 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 85.87 _ 336212 7/112010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 36.63 COUPLER 00005936 239283 611347 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20,15 PVC FITTINGS 00001001 239284 611028 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 90.52 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005840 239669 610572 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF. CARE 147.30 336213 7/1/2010 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. .101.83 ,DOOR MAINTENANCE 239379 D214378 -IN 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 101.03 336214 711/2010 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 297.35 PHONES /INTERNET 239670 6996482 7411.6188 TELEPHONE - PSTF OCCUPANCY 297.35 336215 71112010 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 239370 070110 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 336216 _ 7/1/2010 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE ' 4.58 239380 053110 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 7.68 239380 053110 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 20.93 239380 053110 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 20.97 239380 053110 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 14 7/1/2010 - 7/112010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25.87 239380 053110 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 27.30 239380 053110 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 31.30 239380 053110 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 34.56 239380 053110 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 36.24 239380 053110 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 44.97 239380 053110 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 66.07 239380 053110 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.41 239380 053110 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 122.59 239380 053110 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 126.80 239380 053110 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 134.11 239380 053110 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 143.98 239380 053110 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 220.13 239380 053110 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 221.45 239380 053110 5431.6556 TOOLS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 222.99 239380 053110 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 263.27 239380 053110 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 359.54 239380 053110 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 697.06 239380 053110 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,934.80 336217 7/1/2010 100830 JERRY S PRINTING 152.30 LEAGUE TICKETS 00006049 239499 50295 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 152.30 336218 7/1/2010 102146 JESSEN PRESS 694.47 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 239728 062810 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 694.47 336219 71112010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 161.80 239346 1399821 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,022.10 239347 1399818 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 760.65 239500 1405641 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 129.60 239501 987954 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 30.00 239554 1399859 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 125.75 239555 1399862 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,708.50 239556 1399858 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,186.58 239557 1399860 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,390.15 239778 1399867 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23,515.13 336220 7/112010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES / LESCO 2,717.97 MERIDIAN 00006262 239671 54838196 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Subledger Account Description CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6/2912010 11:36:29 Page - _ 15 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE,&GROUNDS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING . 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/112010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 142.15 INSECTICIDE 00006264 239672- 54856251 5431.6545 10.88 SPRAY TIP. 239673 -54853596 5422.6406 2,871.00 336223 7/1/2010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO: 73.50 239348 1854343 5862.5512 679.68 239349 1855045 5842.5513 637.76 239350 1854900 5842.5513 194.24 239351 1834360 5842.5513 34.78- 239352 461804 5842.5512 27.85- 239353 461806 5842.5512 6.67- 239396 462490 5862.5513 5.33- - - 239397 462489 5862.5513 8.27- 239398 462491 5862.5513 9.00- 239399 421712 5862.5513. 10.00- 239400 439107 5822.5513 528.96 239558 1858154 5822.5513 596.08 239559 1858153 5822.5513 513.49 239560 1858152 5822.5513 89.87 239561 1858155 5822.5512 537.47 239562. 1858156 5822.5512 1,784.49 239563 1858171 5862.5512 5,330.60 239564 1858173 5862.5512 1,12 239565 1858159 5862.5515 1,698.29 239566 1858172 5862.5513 1,151.50 239567 1858169 5862.5513 1,103.60 239568 1858170 5862.5513 121.12- 239569 462486 5842.5512 12.40- • 239570 462125 5842.5513 372.10- 239571 462128 5842.5513 12.45- 239572 462126 5862.5513 188.60- 239573 462129 5862.5513 1,994.46 239779 1858163 5842.5513 2,985.96 239780 1858161 5842.5513 5,633.67 239781 1858165 5842.5513 .38 239782 1858157 5842.5512 2.24 239783 1858158 5842.5515 73.21 239784 1858160 5842.5512 44.22 239785 1858162 5842.5513 8,679.00 239786 1858166 5842.5512 94.11 239787 1858167 5842.5515 Subledger Account Description CHEMICALS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6/2912010 11:36:29 Page - _ 15 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE,&GROUNDS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING . 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000- CITY OF'EDINA 6/29/2010;11:36:29 Council Check Register j Page - 16 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No ' Account No Subledger- Account Description Business Unit 5,685.24 239788 1858164 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 54.60- 239789 462127 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 499.70 239790 1859391 _ 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 61.00 239791 1858615 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 148.48 239792 1859375 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 39,959.15 336224 7/1/2010 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD W.- 160.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 239444 062410 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 160.00 336226 71112010 122239:, KANDIKO, GEORGIA., 91.00 SUPPLIES X239445 062410 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 254.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239445 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 345.00 336226 7/112010 126834 KEENER, GREG 133.13 PEST CONTROL AT EDINA POOL 239729 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 133.13 336227 7/1/2010 116295 -KING PAR CORPORATION 559.69 MERCHANDISE 239730 2530517 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 559.69 336229 71112010 122074 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 130.24 PETTY CASH 239732 062310 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES - 154.77 PETTY CASH 239732 062310. 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 285.01 336229 7/112010 105867 KOESSLER, JOE _ 189.00 MAY 2010 SERVICE 239502 060110 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 168.00 336230" 7/1/2010 126824 KRAMER;,SHEILA 24.23 PASS REFUND 239731 -,062410 5600.2039 SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 235.77 PASS REFUND 239731 062410. 5601.4532 SEASON TICKETS EB /CL REVENUES 260.00 336231 7/1/2010 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 16,743.02 POND TREATMENTS .00065169 239674 75814 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 16,743.02 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit _ 336232. 711/2010 106606 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 11646.22 _ LOGO CLOTHING 239503 08660488 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 42.05- RETURN 239504 08687117 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 1,604.17 336233 711/2010 124611 LARSCO INC. 518.50 VALVES, SPRINGS, SCREENS _ 00005879 239675. 2674 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 518.50 336234 7/112010 100862 .LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 157.92 PAINT 00005867 239210 9310590 1301.6406_ GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 215.77 TY -RAP, NUTS, CABLE TIES 00005873 239211 9310591 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 375.14 WASHERS 00005562 239285 9324107 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 240.86 COUPLINGS 00005802 239286 9319233 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.01 DISCS 00005746 239287 9287643 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.93_ CABLE TIES, DRILL BITS 00005802 239288 9287644 1301.6556 i TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 26.93 CABLE TIES; DRILL BITS 00005802'239288 9287644 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.93 CABLE TIES, DRILL BITS 00005802 239288 9287644 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 55.30 CABLE TIES, DRILL BITS 00005802 239288 9287644 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 282.11 CABLE TIES, DRILL BITS 000051102 239288 9287644 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.27 DRILL BITS - 00005802 239289 9287645 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 3.28 DRILL BITS 00005802 239289 9287645 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3.28 DRILL BITS 00005802, 239289 9287645 1553.6556 TOOLS, EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.28, DRILL BITS 00005802 239289 9287645 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 285.52 S CREWS, 'PIN S, BOLTS 00001007 239505 9332413 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,720.53 :- 336236 7/112010 101662 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,637.57 DEDUCTIBLE 239506 00944703 -5/10 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1.637.57 ' 336236 7/1/2010 126823 LEMME, AMBER 1.50 CONCESSIONS.HELP. 239733 062510 - 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 36.04 CONCESSIONS HELP - 239733 062510. 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 37.54 336237. 7/1/2010 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 234.00 239574 3920 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 239575 3918 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK'SELLING 356 -00 239576 10063 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/1/2010 - 711/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336238 7/1/2010 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC 102.26 COPIER USAGE 00001016 239290 1134076 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 102.26 336239 7/112010 101792 LUBE -TECH 1,566.00 OIL 00005975 239212 1784556 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 11566.00 336240 7/1/2010 100443 LUCHT, PETE 131.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 239734 062810 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 131.96 336241 71112010 122472 M & I BANK 140.65 SUPPLIES 239676 061410 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 164.10 SUPPLIES 239676 061410 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 167.72 SUPPLIES 239676 061410 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 280.64 SUPPLIES 239676 061410 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 753.11 336242 711/2010 106677 MAGC 25.00 VOICE COACHING WORKSHOP 239291 AW10ED1 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 360.00 WRITING WORKSHOPS 239292 WW10ED 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 385.00 336243 7/1/2010 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 145.69 TOWELS, TISSUE 239677 W27321 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 145.69 336244 711/2010 126820 MAPLE GROVE PRINTING 1,026.00 ABSENTEE BALLOTS 239678 50767 1180.6575 PRINTING 1,026.00 336246 7/1/2010 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 425.00 HOSTING FEE 239507 146 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 336246 7/1/2010 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN 300.00 "IN EDINA" PACKAGES 239769 062510 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 336247 7/112010 103319 MEDALIST CONCERT BAND 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 18 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION PSTF RANGE PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY PUBLIC PROGRAMS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY ELECTION COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 717/10 239458 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 336248 7/112010 123847 MEDICA SELF INSURED 973.64 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 239735 ANITA PETERSON 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 973.64 336249 7/1/2010 101987 .MENARDS 51.71 GLOVES, HARDWARE 00002078 239736 92574 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 51.71 336250 711/2010 102281 'MENARDS 25.56 LUMBER 00005814 239293 46751 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 197.46 KNEEPADS; TIEDOWNS, HAMMERS00001011 -239679 48322 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 72.02 BUILDING MATERIALS 00005948 239680 50494 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 295.04 336251 71112010 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 816.79 '`_'FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005856 239681 124734 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER. FIELD MAINTENANCE 226.36 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005848 239682 124657 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 30.00' PLAYGROUND BALLS 239683 124743 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND &.THEATER 44.28 MESH BAGS 239683 124743 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1,117.43 336262 7/1/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 3,171.40 ASPHALT 00001224 239213 104876MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 201.90 ASPHALT 00001224 239214 104707MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 10,784.49 'ASPHALT 00001224 239214 104707MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP" STREET- RENOVATION 2,071.11 ASPHALT 00001224 239294 105024MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 16,228.90 336253 7/112010 125297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE 1,565.00 . INSTRUCTOR AC 239446 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,565.00 336254 7/1/2010 125297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE 270.00 PROGRAM 7/11110 239460 061710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 270.00 336256 7/112010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,715.00 GATE VALVE REPAIR 00005914 239684 33649 5913.6180 CONTRACTED, REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 980.00 REPLACE STANDPIPE 00005913 239685 33647 5913.6180 CONTRACTED; REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,960.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00005912 239686 33646 5913.6180 CONTRACTED; REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 171.00 CITY OF EDINA 3523 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,655.00 PIERCING VALVE 00001012 239687 754766 1646.6530 336266 7/1/2010 126827 MINNESOTA EXTERIORS INC. 3.32 77.80 PERMIT REFUND 239737 ED099928 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 77.80 336257 7/1/2010 00001042 239296 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.71 POSTAGE MACHINE SUPPLIES 239381 62776 1550.6235 POSTAGE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.71 14.71 BOLTS AND RETAINERS 00001047 239298 336268 711/2010 REPAIR PARTS 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 219.86 418.86 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASSES 239508 10075 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71112010 418.86 336269 7/1/2010 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPAS FAMILY FEST 7/11/10 239463 060710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 299.00 ANGELA MCINTIRE 239295 EVERYDAY ECON 1160.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 299.00 336265 71112010 336260 7/1/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 192.45 SPRAYER, HOSE, NOZZLES 00002088 239738 0084995 -IN 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 192.45 336261 7/112010 126817 MINNESTALGIA WINERY 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 20 Business Unit INSPECTIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS FINANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES 171.00 239577 3523 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 171.00 336262 7/1/2010 100898 MINVALCO 3.32 PIERCING VALVE 00001012 239687 754766 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3.32 336263 711/2010 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 94.85 WHEEL NUTS 00001042 239296 481088F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.30 BUSHINGS, LINKS, NUTS 00001046 239297 481100F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.71 BOLTS AND RETAINERS 00001047 239298 481132F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 219.86 336264 71112010 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 FAMILY FEST 7/11/10 239463 060710 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 336265 71112010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 66.78 V -BELTS 00006258 239215 736644 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Check # Date 336266 711/2010 336267 711/2010 100916 MUZAK 221.81 MUSIC SERVICE 239740 A450536 221.81 336268 7/1/2010 5842.5513 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. Council Check Register . i GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.50 239793 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description .53.25 IRRIGATION PARTS: -. 00005855 239216 738437 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS.. 68.94 - IRRIGATION PARTS 00005855 239217 738375 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 98.61 HAND TOOLS 00005822 239688 735131 -00 1643.6556 TOOLS 158.67 STARTER FOR PICKER 00006253 239689 734050 -00 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS 287.10 GRINDER REPAIR 104360 NIKE USA INC. 239690 736646 -00 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 555.43 MOTOR, FRAME 00006261 239691 737407 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS .323.41 IRRIGATION.HEADS & PARTS 00002090 239739 736773 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,612.19 926534078 180.03 MERCHANDISE 239744 926534079 106323 MTM RECOGNITION- 308.40 MERCHANDISE 239745 926860455 4,682.81 AWARDS 312.03 239509 5488678 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,682.81 2,559.18 _- 336271 71112010 100916 MUZAK 221.81 MUSIC SERVICE 239740 A450536 221.81 336268 7/1/2010 5842.5513 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.50 239793 6391 147.00 239794 60472 121.50- 239795 25235 27.00 336269 71112010 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 747.48 NUMBERS 00001018 239299 TI- 0222774 747.48 33627.0 7/1/2010 104360 NIKE USA INC. 1,371.85 MERCHANDISE 239741 926197921 356.25 MERCHANDISE 239742 926429572 30.62 MERCHANDISE 239743 926534078 180.03 MERCHANDISE 239744 926534079 308.40 MERCHANDISE 239745 926860455 312.03 MERCHANDISE 239746 927106225 2,559.18 _- 336271 71112010 100292 NORTHERN ESCROW INC. 116,944.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 239747 062510 116,944.12 336272 7/112010 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 345:92 STROBE LIGHTS 00001032 239692 24497 5631.6105 - DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 4402.1705.30 1553.6530 i COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP i COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP i COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 21 Business Unit GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES CONTINGENCIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING STREET NAME SIGNS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES. ; PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/112010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345.92 336273 7/112010 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239447 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 480.00 336274 7/1/2010 101669 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 119.40 PEST CONTROL 239218 55721022 1551,6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 119.40 336276 71112010 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 133.80 COOKIES 239510 80059742 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 133.80 336276 7/112010 124697 PARKER, CHELSEA 728.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 239448 062410 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 728.00 336277 711/2010 102440 PASS, GRACE 374.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239449 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 524.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 239449 062410 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 898.00 336278 7/1/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,066.45 239401 8264828 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,695.50 239578 8264821 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.25 239579 8261650 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,184.06 239580 8264836 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,067.26 336279 7/1/2010 100949 PDI NINTH HOUSE 5,000.00 FEE FOR SERVICE 239511 1101101983 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 5,000.00 336280 7/1/2010 100674 PENHALL COMPANY 275.00 CORE DRILL CONCRETE 00005892 239300 53499 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 275.00 336281 7/1/2010 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 751.36 239512 61933730 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 16.67- 239513 61933678 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 357.87 239693 61933751 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 R55CKRE-6 LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation- PO #. - Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,092.56 336283 -: 7/1/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE& SPIRITS. 73.12 239354 2925022 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266.64 239355 2924473 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,197.82 239581 2927267 5862.5513 COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 322.24, 239582 2927261 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON- SELLING 984.47 239583 2927269 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 236.96 239584 2927268 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 72.12 239585 .2927266 .5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 74.24 239586 2927270 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 571.20 239587 2921369 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 231.01 239588 2927259 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,873.97 239589 2927258 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 358.44 239590 2927260 5822.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5.00- 239591 3430943 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11.04 239592 3438714 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.67- 239593 3438713 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 201.12- 239594 3438712 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.96- 239595 3438711 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.52- 239596 3438710 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 401.12- 239597 3438355 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD. WINE VERNON SELLING 12.50- 239598 3438113 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.33 - 239599 3438175 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,82- 239600 3438112 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12.00- 239601 3438174 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12.00- 239602 3430965 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10.33- 239603 3430944 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 53.47- 239604 3430942 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,878.03 239796 2927264 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,118.89 239797 2927262 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.07 239798 2927265 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 193.98 239799 2927263 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12,702.32 336284 7/112010 124176 PINNACLE'.OISTRIBUTING 280.00 239605 10749 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 280.00 336286 7/1/2010 124031 PLUS ONE SERVICES 149.09 STORE PENS 239219 2960 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES- 50TH ST SELLING 149.09 STORE PENS 239219 2960 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 24 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 149.09 STORE PENS 239219 2960 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 561.25 TANK TEES 00009134 239514 2947 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,008.52 336286 7/1/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 135.00 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL FEE 00005810 239515 612038 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 467.86 TIRES 00005764 239516 618491 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 599.25 TIRES 00005763 239517 618475 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 246.82 TIRES 00005810 239518 615171 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 702.34 TIRES 00005810 239519 615235 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,151.27 336287 7/1/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 185.00 BRM PERMIT #6171000 239382 061610 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 185.00 336288 7/112010 103094 PROTECTION ONE 162.23 ALARM MONITORING 12743654 239220 061010 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 162.23 336289 7/1/2010 126822 PURDY, TYLER 8.10 UTILITY FINAL REFUND 239748 062510 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 8.10 336290 7/1/2010 101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS 669.40 PUMP REPAIR 00005899 239301 22434 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 669.40 336291 7/112010 100971 QUALITY WINE 3,587.23 239402 321735 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 979.20 239403 321736 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,089.67 239404 322005 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 926.40 239405 320987 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,300.83 239406 321737 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 737.40 239407 321658 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 928.00 239408 322006 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 139.20 239409 322007 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,073.58 239410 321738 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 775.60 239411 321022 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.83- 239412 319164-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.33- 239413 319163 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.61- 239414 319422 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7.50- 239606 309502 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 27.08- 239607 321312 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST- SELLING 8.70- 239800 321501 -00 5842:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,465.06 336292 _ 7/1/2010 123898 QWEST 58.33 952 922 -2444 239749 2444 -6/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 114.13 952 920 -8166 239750 8166 -6/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE :CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 172.46 336293 7/112010 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN I 351.34 ZAMBONI REPAIR 00008067 239221 0045295 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTEI)i REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT. 351.34 336294 7/112010 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 739.00 RE_ PAIRS TO WATER FOUNTAIN 00002099 239751' 12227 5650.6180 CONTRACTED! REPAIRS PROMENADE 739.00 - - 336296 7/1/2010 126326 REACH LOCAL INC. 236.66 INTERNET ADVERTISING 239222 - - EDINA LIQUOR 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 236.67 INTERNET ADVERTISING 239222 EDINA LIQUOR 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 236.67 INTERNET ADVERTISING 239222 EDINA LIQUOR 5842.6122 ADVERTISING'OTHER YORK.SELLING ' 710.00 336296 7/1/2010 119864 RHINO - 412.66 MH MARKERS 00005700 239302 34938 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 412.66 336297 7/1/2010 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 79.80 DILLY BARS 239520 505 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 79.80 336298 7/1/2010 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY .163.80 DRAIN REPAIR' =. 239223 55067 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 136.00 CLEARED FLOOR DRAIN 00006048 239521 55156 5420.6180. CONTRACTED'REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 299.80 336299 71112010 114158 RITE -WAY WATERPROOFING 135.00 SERVICE CALL TO TUPA PK 00005854 239694 6731 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 135.00 336300 7/11" 100986 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -NA 612bicu10 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 26 7/112010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 271.24 TRUCK HOOK, SPRAY WAND 00005758 239224 C55407 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.80 GUARD 00005758 239225 C55408 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 298.07 HAND TOOLS, SHOVELS 00001014 239303 C55490 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 668.11 336301 7/112010 126828 SABRE HEATING S A/C 137.64 PERMIT REFUND 239752 ED099958 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 137.64 336302 7/1/2010 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 48.90 BAKERY 239522 284834 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 48.90 336303 7/1/2010 117807 SAM'S CLUB 12.55 CLASS REFRESHMENTS 239695 003146 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 12.55 336304 711/2010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 24.21 101" ""'9350 239383 062210 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 24.84 101 -"*"*'9350 239383 062210 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND 8 THEATER 9.78 101 -"**"•9350 239384 062310 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 18.64 101= "••'•9350 239384 062310 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 30.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 239753 999999 -6/10 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 107.47 336306 7/1/2010 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 95.12 GAUGE KITS 00005649 239226 2021257 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.37 QUICK CONNECTS 00005649 239227 1049967 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 194.49 336306 7/112010 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 17.62 PASLODE FUEL CELL 00005869 239696 40849291 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17.62 336307 7/1/2010 100997 SESAC INC. 168.50 MUSIC LICENSE 00008072 239385 3179285 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 168.50 336308 7/112010 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 PERFORMANCE 7/6110 239457 061010 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29. R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 7/1/2010 — 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336309 71112010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239450 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION - 1,828.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 239450 062410 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 2,068.00 336310 711/2010 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 185.89 PAINT 00008060 239386 2619 -8 5511.6532 PAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 185.89 336311 7/1/2010 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 1,023.06 PAINT 00005155 239304 4326 -5 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 1,023.06 336312 7/112010 126831 SHIN, CHO SOON - 23.25 CLASS REFUND 239754 062310 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 23.25 336313 7/112010 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 336.95 PLANTS 239755 062210 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 336.95 336314 7/112010 126818 SHORROCK, CAROL 55.25 ART WORK SOLD 239451 062410 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.25 336316 7/1/2010 116633 SHRM 160.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 239523 9003285938 1120.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 160.00 336316 7/1/2010 117179 SIGNAL'PRO.EQUIPMENT 91.78 WHEEL, STUDS 00005299 239305 71857 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 91.78 3x6317 7/1/2010 101632 SMITH, CECELIA 286.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 239524 062310 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 286.50 336318 7/1/2010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 891:90 INSTRUCTOR AC 239452 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,031.00 CLEANING /MAINTENANCE 239452 062410 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 1,922.90 R55CKREG LOG20000 STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL CITY OF EDINA TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE ASSESSING TELEPHONE Council Check Register TELEPHONE PLANNING TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 336319 7/1/2010 104672 SPRINT GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 39.99 EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 239306 666109817 -031 1322.6188 TELEPHONE 20.64 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 239387 873184124 -091 1240.6188 35.76 239387 873184124 -091 7411.6188 51.18 239387 873184124-091 5841.6188 51.71 239387 873184124 -091 1190.6188 52.14 239387 873184124 -091 1490.6188 65.50 239387 873184124 -091 1140.6188 72.24 239387 873184124 -091 5422.6188 83.04 239387 873184124 -091 1553.6188 102.68 239387 873184124 -091 1554.6230 105.12 239387 873184124 -091 4090.6188 119.85 239387 873184124 -091 2210.6188 129.36 239387 873184124 -091 1322.6188 170.19 239387 873184124 -091 1470.6188 195.11 239387 873184124 -091 1301.6188 319.21 239387 873184124 -091 1120.6188 326.88 239387 873184124 -091 1495.6188 360.95 239387 873184124 -091 5621.6188 453.60 239387 873184124 -091 1640.6188 498.24 239387 873184124 -091 5910.6188 849.77 239387 873184124 -091 1260.6188 1,434.80 239387 873184124 -091 1400.6188 439.89 CARD READERS 239697 312188813 -031 1470.6151 5,977.85 336320 7/1/2010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 41.20 SOLENOID 239698 S2221019.001 5311.6406 41.20 336321 711/2010 126833 ST PAUL POLICE CANINE UNIT 50.00 K9 HANDLER UPDATE 239756 062210 1400.6104 50.00 336322 7/112010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 54.38 STEP 00005646 239307 S179068 1553.6530 54.38 336323 7/1/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 80.65 KEYS 239525 247247 1400.6406 176.73 SHAFT, INSULATORS 00001040 239526 246990 1553.6530 27.74 VALVE 239527 235505 1553.6530 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 28 Subledger Account Description Business Unit TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE ASSESSING TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE PLANNING TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger.. Account Description Business Unit 107.30- CREDIT - 239528 CM230617 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.47 CABLE ASSEMBLY 00001053 239699 247899 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 258.29 , 336324 7/1/2010 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORT_ S INC. 793.92 SPEED CARTS 239757 435783 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 793.92 336326 71112010 100900 . SUN NEWSPAPERS 525.00 PUBLISH AD FOR OLD PW BLDG 239388 1241693 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 504.00 , GRADUATE NOTICE 239529 1256938 1550.6121. ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 300.00 GRADUATE AD 239530 1252361 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL - CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,329.00 336326 7/1/2010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,334.00 239415 Z00914 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 800.00 239608 MVP01032 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,134.00 336327 7/1/2010 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 239531 318844 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 38.00 336328 7/1/2010 104932 TAYLOR MADE 46.90 MERCHANDISE 239758 14273646 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO. SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,220.18 MERCHANDISE 239759 14214536 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,013.04 MERCHANDISE 239760. 14250231 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP.,RETAIL SALES 2,280.12 336329 7/1/2010 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 67.74 LAMPS 00001639 .239308 38227 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.15 LAMPS 00005051 239309 50752 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.15 LAMPS 00001639 239310 38227 -02 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.74 ` LAMPS 00005072 239311 58012 -01 ,1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 329.78 336330 7/1/2010 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 43.85 SPRAY 00006259 239228 S129056 -IN 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 153.90 FLAGSTICKS 00006259 239229 5129054 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 197.75 - 336331 711/9^"1 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page- 30 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,593.00 239356 595930 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 122.55 239357 595931 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 655.00 239532 00771445 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 244.20 239533 596132 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 146.50 239609 596911 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7,112.85 239610 596910 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 9,874.10 336332 7/1/2010 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 85.00 CANOEING FEES 239230 5568956 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 440.00 FIELD TRIPS 239312 5586644 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 525.00 336333 7/1/2010 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 318.00 ELEVATOR REPAIR 00008068 239231 012564 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 318.00 336334 7/1/2010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 262.50 DRAFT MINUTES 6/1/10 239700 M17762 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 262.50 336336 7/1/2010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 142.62 WELDING RODS 00005651 239313 310566 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.62 336336 7/1/2010 104182 TOPPERS AND MORE 169.69 BALANCE DUE FOR TOPPER 00005618 239389 2118 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 169.69 336337 7/1/2010 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 221.52 SOLENOID 00005662 239314 169687 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 221.52 336338 7/1/2010. 124697 TUORILA, SHERYL 600.00 INSTRUCTION AC 239453 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 600.00 336339 7/1/2010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 1,431.14- RETURN 239315 SC01073 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 567.55- RETURN 239316 SC01074 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 159.16 SWITCH 00005742 239317 S122976 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 716.11 DRIVESHAFT 00005792 239318 J131031 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 31 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE &,GROUNDS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY RESERVE PROGRAM EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO''# Doc,No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 530.51 TINES, HOLDERS 00006250 239319 JI31247 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 67.84 TINE HOLDER _ 00006250 239320 J131247A 5422:6530 REPAIR PARTS 52.49 ADAPTER 00001005 239321 0121158 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 73.07 TIE ROD, SUPPORT 00001005 239322 0121103 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 737.49 MOTOR 00005659-239323 0121294 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 337.98 336340 7/112010 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 855.00 SEED 00006364 239232 23254 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 855.00 336341 7/1/2010 103048 U.S. BANK 924.00 ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE FEE 239534 6302576 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 924.00 33634.2 71112010 101049 UHL-COMPANY 3,000.00 RECOMMISIONING PROJECT 239701 50166 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000.00 336343 7/112010 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 239.75 UNIFORMS 239233 053110 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1,600.45 UNIFORMS 239233 053110 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 3,973.99 UNIFORMS 239233 053110 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5,814.19 336344 7/112010 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 514.07 .PARTS, MAINTENANCE 00005816. 239324 88003087 -001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 514.07 336345 7/1/2010 100050 USPS - HASLER 8,000.00. ACCT #75983 239761 062510 1550.6235 POSTAGE 8,000.00 336346 7/1/2010 122664 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 98.06 OXYGEN 00003649 239702 199157 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 98.06 336347 7/1/2010 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 2,775.41 EMERGENCY MAIN REPAIR 00005910 239535 15549 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,775.41 336348 7/1/9 -n 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 31 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE &,GROUNDS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY RESERVE PROGRAM EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 32 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 239.49 TISSUE 00005853 239234 163680 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 496.89 LIQUOR BAGS OOOD7512 239703 163832 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 26.09- CREDIT 00007512 239704 164341CI 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 494.90 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005946 239705 164441 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,205.19 336349 7/1/2010 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC 433.34 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 239536 062410 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 433.34 336360 7/1/2010 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.61 239235 2414436103 5952.6188 TELEPHONE RECYCLING 35.66 239235 2414436103 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 67.25 239235 2414436103 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 96.50 239235 2414436103 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 110.25 239235 2414436103 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 110.26 239235 2414436103 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 285.02 239235 2414436103 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 737.55 336361 7/1/2010 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 49.71 GASKETS, SASH 00006255 239236 48304 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 251.73 CLUTCH 00006257 239237 48307 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 2,671.88 E -Z -GO CAR 00002303 239762 61710002 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,973.32 336362 7/1/2010 101064 VESSCO INC. 24.71 REPAIR REGULATOR 239238 48189 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 24.71 336353 7/1/2010 126826 VIETH, KIP 44.21 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 239763 062410 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 44.21 336354 7/1/2010 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 67.97 SAFETY GLASSES 00005893 239325 250846 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 67.97 336365 7/1/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA 94.75 239358 0027015 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.75 ' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2912010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 33 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /_ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336366 7/1/2010 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 179.50 .239801 13645 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ' 179.50 336367 7/M010 120627 - VISTAR CORPORATION 424.77 CONCESSION PRODUCT 239239 28422201 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 83.76 TISSUE, TOWELS 239706 28465442 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 769.51, CONCESSION PRODUCT 239706 28465442 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 28.56 CAN LINERS 239707 28446510 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION ' 845.51 CONCESSION PRODUCT 239707 28446510 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,152.13 336368 7/1/2010 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. - 581.08 SEAL KIT, PUMP REPAIR 239241 83344 5311.6180 CONTRACTED; REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 581.08 336369 711/2010 126830 WAGNER, JAN 23.25 CLASS REFUND 239764 062310 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 23.25 336360 7/1/2010 -.,101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/6/10 239456 060110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 336361 711/2010 116616 WELDON, KEN 60.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239454 062410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 336362 7/112010 126821 WELLS, AMBER 51.97 SWIM SUITS 239765 062510 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 51.97 336363 7/1/2010 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 566.06 JULY MAINTENANCE 239371 070110 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 566.06 336364 7/112010 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 2,341.06 HANDICAP DOOR REPAIR 00008043 239240 SPI06858 5511.6180 - CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,341.06 336366 7/112010 126764 WILLIAMS, KELLER 50.28 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 239766 062210 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 34 7/112010 - 7/112010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.28 336366 7/112010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 180.20 239359 245212 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE 50TH ST SELLING 399.75 239416 245444 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 713.00 239611 245585 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,292.95 336368 7/1/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 983.94 239612 322372 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 756.48 239613 322376 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,366.02 239614 322374 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10.33- 239615 48880 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8.00- 239616 48692 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.67- 239617 48717 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 15.00- 239618 48693 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.60- 239619 48691 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.34- 239620 48690 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17.34- 239621 48931 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.00- 239622 48892 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.33- 239623 48893 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 29.67- 239624 48938 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.60- 239625 48887 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.33- 239626 48891 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19.31- 239627 48888 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 35.31- 239628 48889 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.64- 239629 48890 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.67- 239630 48932 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 44.80- 239631 48933 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 420.47 239802 322373 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,191.69 239803 322375 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,458.66 336369 7/1/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 139.61 239360 414297 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,605.45 239417 417300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,231.50 239418 417302 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,157.95 239419 417304 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE 50TH ST SELLING 1,355.10 239420 417303 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 46.57 239421 417307 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,424.75 239422 417299 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,410.33 239423 417301 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6129/2010 11:36:29 Council Check Register Page - 35 7/1/2010 - 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 75.80- 239424 803194 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.10- 239425 803306 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 129.10- 239426 803629 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 39.29- 239427 803658 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13,802.76 239632 417306 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,958.74 239633 417305 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,476.00 239804 417804 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,642.92 239805 417308 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105.05- 239806 804134 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.23- 239807 804133 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 46,813.11 336370 7/1/2010 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,690.53 239361 622657 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,299.70 239362 622977 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,023.11 239363 622672 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 88.80 239364 622673 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 64.50 239428 623544 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,919.80 239429 623543 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 299.20 239537 622435 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 188.80 239634 625572 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,105.25 239635 625571 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 12.25- 239636 000625CORRECTIO 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING N 3,274.38 239808 625551 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 24,941.82 336371 7/1/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 207.90 239430 250056 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,395.40 239431 250058 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 877.40 239637 250059 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,480.70 336372 71112010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 43.02 51- 5276505 -8 239242 242739782 1330.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 11,960.45 51- 6644819 -9 239767 243764814 5620.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 12,003.47 336373 711/2010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 533.84 GAS 00006403 239243 985183 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 740.32 GAS 00006403 239244 985181 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 869.23 DIESEL 00006404 239245 985182 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURS' 'ROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF FLANA Council Check Register 7/1/2010 — 7/1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5422.6406 5422.6406 5110.6564 5110.6103 421552.6710 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 622,348.42 Total Payments 622,348.42 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 36 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PW BUIL CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 2,143.39 336374 7/1/2010 122316 ZACK'S INC. 11.79 HAND CLEANER 239246 25956 11.79 336376 7/1/2010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 108.46 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00006439 239708 54066091 108.46 336376 7/1/2010 101631 ZINN, BOBO 79.64 SUPPLIES 239455 062410 352.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 239455 062410 431.64 336377 7/1/2010 126843 JEN'S VENDING REPAIR S SALES 5,541.47 COFFEE /VENDING MACHINES 00001228 239809 062910 5.541.47 622,348.42 Grand Total 5422.6406 5422.6406 5110.6564 5110.6103 421552.6710 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 622,348.42 Total Payments 622,348.42 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6/29/2010 11:36:29 Page - 36 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PW BUIL CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 7/112010 7/1/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 107,051.36 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,004.49 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 123,343.83 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND. 5,711.16 05100 ART CENTER FUND 14,484.34 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 44.96 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,895.63 '- 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 42,993.36 05500 ICE ARENA FUND .4,223.72 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 20,113.96 05800 LIQUOR FUND 228,995.63 05900 UTILITY FUND 42,159.36 .05930 STORM SEWER FUND 17,796.81 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.61 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,497.20 Report Totals 622,348.42 . We c_ onfirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these Idlaims comply in all material lrespects with. the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pbllgles and 6/29/2010 11:37:42 Page- 1 -k o Le con J B8 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. A. DEBRA MANGEN F-1 Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: JULY 61 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Susan Howl RECEIVED JUN 2 9 2010 Re: June 30 Public Hearing Request to Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 "Approving Amendment to Master Plan Final Development Plan, Cypress Equities" (Condition # 15) Pinstripes Restaurant As a resident of Edina and Coventry Town homes, I respectfully request that the City Leaders of Edina approve the elimination of Condition #15. 1 am also in favor of an outdoor fireplace - with the Fire Chief s blessing. I have met with the owner /manager of Pinstripes and believe that every measure will be taken to operate a successful business as well as be a respectful neighbor. I trust the City Leaders will agree that amplified music on an exterior patio is a lovely addition and adds to the overall dining experience. I am confident that Pinstripes' management would no sooner "amplify" their exterior music in excess, thereby creating an uncomfortable dining experience - let alone disturb residents located quite a distance from the diners. Sincerely, Kerry Kisling 410 Coventry Lane Edina, MN 55435 952 -426 -0527 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Emailing: wood - stoves - under - fire -as- health -risk Attachments: ATT8814788.W RECEIVED JUN 17 1010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailto:mellum.julie @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9 :00 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Emailing: wood - stoves - under - fire -as- health -risk Lynette, Please forward this to Mayor Hovland, City Council Members, the City Attorney and Planning Commission. Thank you. Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, Thank you for hearing my comments on wood smoke pollution at Tuesday's City Council meeting. Please have a look at what Chico, California is doing in a major educational campaign to alert citizens to the negative impacts of wood smoke. Articles like this appear in newspapers nation -wide almost daily -- testimony to the seriousness of the issue. Shortcut to: http: / /www.fairwarning.org/ 2010 /06/ wood - stoves - under - fire -as- health -risk/ Julie Mellum 1 Susan Howl From: Sent: Cc: Subject: Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com Lynette Biunno Monday, June 14, 2010 4:26 PM Susan Howl FW: Ordinance 2010 -09 Section 900 From: Bill Lindmeier [mai Ito: blindmeier @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 4:24 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Ordinance 2010 -09 Section 900 RECEIVED JUN 16 1010 I have been a resident of Edina for 15 years and do not approve of allowing hard liquor sales in bowling centers such as the one being proposed at Centennial Lakes. Thank You William Lindmeier 4925 Maple Road Edina MN 55424 r BOB & MIRIAM HARTUNG RECEIVED 6519 Biscayne Blvd. SUN Z g 2Qj0 Edina, MN 55436 952 - 930 -3652 Mmartin952@comcast.net We are residents of Parkwood Knolls near Walnut Ridge Park and we are writing to voice our deep concerns about the proposed biking trail through the Parkwood Knolls area, in particular Walnut Ridge Park. The proposed estimated cost of $20 -30M for 7 miles of bike trail in the middle of a deep recession, when essential services such as teachers are being cut back due to funding, is exorbitant beyond reason. Incurring this huge debt is a misplacement of the community's priorities. In addition there will need to be maintenance costs; the existing walking path has not been well'maintained so there is no reason to think the biking path would be maintained if the current facilities are not well maintained; as a single example, the hockey rink is in dire need of repairs - the light poles are crooked and rusted and the boards around the perimeter are dilapidated. Until recently, there has been very little information about this proposed bike trail that will affect many people in the community in an adverse way. Any meetings thus far have been informational only without any input from concerned citizens. Some of our concerns are the negative impact on Walnut Ridge Park. - many people in our community who have children who play in the park on the playground and the sports playing field are concerned for the safety of their children and some have stated they will not let their children go there unsupervised if the bike trail goes in - non - bikers will have to cross the bike path to go to the playground and playing fields - at the present time, the parking lot is filled to capacity with children's sports events; more cars will increase on- street parking - the biking path will be within a few feet of the children's playground and sports field - the projected bath is within a few feet of residential homes adjacent to the park - security issues with very limited enforcement officers We have been life -long cyclists and have always felt good about participating in an activity that does not impact the environment and in some cases avoids using vehicles that do impact the environment. It is ironic to think that cyclists who genuinely have a concern about the environment are being accommodated by a project that has a huge adverse environmental impact. Some of the environmental concerns are run -off and erosion into Nine Mile Creek from this 10 -foot path with 3- foot shoulders. A large number of mature trees are slated for destruction and we understand that the number of trees in the environmental study grossly understated the number of trees that will need to be eliminated. In addition to the erosion and tree loss, the bike path will create a bridge through a wetland and the environmental study only considered water and none of the other factors that are part of the value of a wetland. We hope that City Council will take these concerns into consideration and be responsive to the concerns of the community they represent and exercise fiscal responsibility in these extremely difficult economic times when the basic qualities of life of the community are not being provided. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail CREEKSIDE R E C E 1 a' : ) From: Lindsay Amundson [mailto:lindsay.amundson @gmail.com] JUN 2 9 2010 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:14 AM To: NineMileTrail @threeriversparkdistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail CREEKSIDE Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: We recently purchased a home in Edina and were disappointed to learn of the small number of trails for joggers and bikers as my husband and I enjoy these activities. I strongly support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. I do not believe a trail on the street would be used or enjoyed nearly as much. I know my husban and I would not use such a trail. Edina is a fantastic community and it deserves a beautiful trail for its residents to use. I am unsure of why thre is so much debate about using public land for the public. I also support the use of walkways to minimize environmental damage. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Lindsay Amundson Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: Megan Kelly [mailto:mmckelly @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:29 AM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland JUN 2 9 101J Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Megan Kelly Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: Lauren Fulner [ mailto:lauren.fulner @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:16 AM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno JUN 2 9 1813 Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. Particularly as a resident of Minneapolis I appreciate being able to travel to the suburbs in a safe, relatively pollution free manner. Creation of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail would encourage such sustainable travel. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Lauren Fulner Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the creek From: Tim Amundson [mailto:tim.amundson @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:38 AM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the creek_: Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail along the creek in Edina. My wife and I recently purchased a home in Edina and were shocked about the lack of public trails. A non - roadside trail for walkers, joggers, and riders would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. Also, rrecreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. This trail would be a fantastic asset to the community. I do not see a roadside trail as a viable option. Residents would not enjoy this trail due to the traffic and noise and I am sure would not be used as often. Also, I am concerned about how it might impact traffic in some areas. I do not understand why there is debate around using public land for the public. This seems like a fantastic use of this land since it is essentially inaccessible to the vast majority of Edina residents. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Tim Amundson Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland RECEIVED From: Ralph Savage [mailto:thatsavage @gmail.com] JUN 2 9 201 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:20 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios I have just completed reading the story about the Nine Mile Creek potential bike / walking trail project in today's Star Tribune. It appears there is much consideration and debate over the placement of the trail. Really ?? As a citizen of Edina it is so clearly a 'no- brainer' choice. The trail should be along the creek where it pro -Odes the biggest benefit to the most citizens. Granted, the loudest voices are now of the NIMBY (not in my back yard) contingent. Your respect for their voice and concerns is admirable and necessary. However, the decision has to be based on what is the best for all the citizens of Edina. There are 40,000 silent citizens who probably don't know the issue even exists; but, would benefit from this trail because it will make Edina a better place to live. When first looking at a community to move to 30 years ago there were three primary reasons Edina was selected - the educational system, the efficiency of the city, and the parks and rec system. The dedication to these must continue for all citizens. Best regards, Ralph and Jan Savage 48oi Rolling Green Parkway Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl From: Werbalowsky, Jeffrey [mailto:]Werbalowsky @HL.com] R D.C.Ei ! ED Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 12:36 PM ��� 2 20]0 To: ninemilecreektrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Cc: MARY & JEFF WERBALOWSKY; Lana Slavitt; andrew @heyer.us Subject: Nine Mile Regional Creek Bike Trail Through Edina Dear Community representatives: We are STRONGLY in favor of the Trail. As John Keprios can attest, we were very supportive of constructing the Fox Meadow Park in Edina, and helped organize with others financial support for what has turned out to be a wonderful small neighborhood park. We were amazed that there were neighbors who were against turning this weed strewn lot into a neat little neighborhood park, but we learned in that process that people have idiosyncratic reactions that are often not at all consistent with "social benefit" when there is anything that affects their personal property rights (even if ultimately beneficial to them personally). People fear change, and are extremely resistant to compromising in any way their own property rights notwithstanding the clear public good -NIMBY is alive and well unfortunately in Edina. You will hear all the typical complaints form opponents about attracting unwanted elements, interfering with their privacy, various dangers real and imagined stemming from the bike path, and complaints as to why some particular route or the entire project do not make sense for someone's private (and selfish) view. We call upon you to do the right thing for our community, which is clearly to promptly construct this trail maximizing the social good, and resisting the private complaints given the unique attributes of this project, As you know, this project has so many positive social benefits they are hard to list. Enhancing the quality of recreation and life in our local community, fostering "green" attributes, linking local neighborhoods for kids and parents in a car free manner, allowing many others to enjoy the beautiful community assets we possess on the creek, improving Edina's "livability" and "bikability" for the increasing number of us who enjoy this recreation. In addition, the fact that this project allows us to connect to the wonderful trails around us increases safety for those of us who already bike those trails but need to use open roads to reach them today, and creates a "network" effect providing extra value for the connection. There are few "no- brainers" in life or government, but from a social perspective this is one. Please do not let the tyranny of the minority at all sidetrack, delay, or in any way reduce the wonderful project potential that exists here. We are not sufficiently conversant with the alternate routes to weigh in on them at this point, but rely on all of the good people who are decision makers here to balance the various interests of social benefit to make the best choice. We call upon you to do your best for all of us who are counting on you to do the right thing for Edina, and we thank you for your considerable efforts to reach this point. Good luck in getting the rest of the way there, and we look forward to utilizing what will be a fabulous community resource with our children and grandchildren. Please feel free to contact us if we can provide any additional input, and please forward this as you see fit to demonstrate our support. Mary and Jeff Werbalowsky 6000 Fox Meadow Lane Edina, Mn 55436 612 940 1969 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile trail From: Kapsen, Kristin [mailto:kristin.kapsen @rbccm.com] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 9:10 AM JUN Z 9 1010 To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Nine Mile trail Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: . I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique. healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Kristin Kapsen This E -Mail (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information. It is intended only for the addressee(s) indicated above. The sender does not waive any of its rights, privileges or other From: Megan Kelly [mailto:mmckelly @gmail.com] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:29 AM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno JUN 2 g 7019 Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Megan Kelly From: Lindsay Amundson [mailto :lindsay.amundson @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:14 AM To: NineMileTrail @threeriversparkdistrict.org; Lynette Biunno RmEiVED Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail CREEKSIDE Please direct this email to: JUN 2 9 2010 Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: We recently purchased a home in Edina and were disappointed to learn of the small number of trails for joggers and bikers as my husband and I enjoy these activities. I strongly support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. I do not believe a trail on the street would be used or enjoyed nearly as much. I know my husban and I would not use such a trail. Edina is a fantastic community and it deserves a beautiful trail for its residents to use. I am unsure of why thre is so much debate about using public land for the public. I also support the use of walkways to minimize environmental damage. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Lindsay Amundson RECEIVED From: Lauren Fulner [mailto:lauren.fulner @gmail.com] JUN 2 9 2010 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:16 AM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. Particularly as a resident of Minneapolis I appreciate being able to travel to the suburbs in a safe, relatively pollution free manner. Creation of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail would encourage such sustainable travel. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Lauren Fulner Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kevin McPherson [ mailto:kbmcpherson @comcast.net] JUN 29 1010 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:48 PM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Cc: andrew @heyer.us Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Please distribute this email to the following: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks to enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Kevin McPherson 6311 Doron Lane Edina, MN 55439 952.943.2646 1 Susan Howl iubject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: Chuck Pappas [mailto:chuckpappas @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:43 PM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno _ Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland E`�E�@ 'IV 6.:D JUN 19 2010 Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I very strongly support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. Routing the trail onto city streets very much defeats the purpose of the trail and would create an unsafe environment for motorists and cyclists alike. The regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Thank you for your kind consideration. Charles and Julie Pappas Susan Howl ir Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the Park System From: bjhunke @comcast.net [mailto:bjhunke @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:42 PM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno , E �f- Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the Park System Please direct this email to the following: JUN 2 9 2010 Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman I highly support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I fully believe the regional trail should run through the park system to enhance the walking and riding experience, versus placing the trail on existing roadways which increase the levels of car exhaust and noise as well as decreases the safety for bicyclists /pedestrians. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through the park system. Sincerely, Brian Hunke Susan Howl iubject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: Lutgen, Edward (DOT) [ma i Ito: Edward. Lutgen @state. m n. us] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:08 PM RECEi To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland JUN 2 9 2019 Mr. Hovland, Mrs. Bennett, Mrs. Brindle, Mr. Housh, Mrs. Swenson and Three Rivers Park District: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. I know that my family would use the system to connect to neighboring locations. We are avid bikers who currently have to load bikes to car and drive to get to access to safe biking path. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks and along Nine Mile Creek. Sincerely, Ed Lutgen 6001 Abbott Ave S Edina, MN 55410 952 - 926 -2015 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: gregory.meyer @parker.com [ mailto:gregory.meyer @parker.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:52 AM RECEi V '(mD To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland JUN 2 Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Also I read in the paper that we already contribute a sizable amount of money to the Three Rivers Park District and it is about time we get something in return. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A trail would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. I ride almost every day in the summer and it can be dangerous to ride on the roads in Edina. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Gregory Meyer 5128 Duggan PL Edina MN 55439 -1453 Cell: (952) 250 -8842 "PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your cooperation." Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek From: Arlou McPherson [mailto:arloumcpherson @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:51 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: JUN 2 9 2010 I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would bean asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Arlou McPherson Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: Alexandra Tapper [ mailto: Alexandra.Tapper @rasmussen.edu] RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:12 AM JUN 2 9 2010 To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, IVMS :N COI_LEC:E Alexandra Tapper / Admissions Representative Rasmussen College - Eden Prairie Online Campus Direct Line: 952.830.3830 Fax: 1.866.789.5609 Alexandra.Tapper @Rasmussen.edu www.RasmussenOnline.edu Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: Johansen, Steve [mailto:sjohanse @ibsys.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:12 AM RECEIVED To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland I1ON 2419 Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: My wife and I are 20 -year residents of Edina, and both of our kids went to Edina Schools. We live on Skyline Drive, just south of Interlachen Boulevard, and we ardently support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. As some of you know, there is a bike lane on both sides of Interlachen. It is narrowly wedged between the curb and the car lane. Having ridden our bikes, walked / jogged on this bike lane hundreds of times, we can tell you it is no fun. You can't enjoy the scenery ( Interlachen Country Club), converse as you ride (car noise); ride, jog or walk side -by -side because you have to be constantly on alert for cars coming up behind you and the danger that presents. These are but a few examples of why you should NOT put the regional trail on city streets. It would not be a fun, relaxing user experience. It would be dangerous and subject bikers / joggers / walkers and car drivers to more accidents. The regional trail along Nine Mile Creek would be just the opposite experience. It would be fun, relaxing and enjoyable. The scenery would be wonderful and it would be easy to pull off the path to stop and enjoy it. The Edina parkland along the creek should be available for all Edina residents to enjoy, so lu ease approve putting the regional trail along Nine Mile Creek. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. Sincerely, Steve Johansen & Bethany Brand June 23, 2010 Dear Mayor Hovland, RECEIVED JUN 2 9 2010 I am writing to ask you to please support a large number of Edina residents who oppose the construction of the Three Rivers Park Trail. Many of us have signed a petition to voice our concerns. After attending last nights meeting at South View, I am even more perplexed and frustrated with the plans for the traiL The excessive amount of spending during a very difficult economic time seems ridiculous. The destruction of the environment during this time of increased national environmental awareness also seems counter productive. As a 32 year Edina resident, homeowner and taxpayer I am appalled that the city would vote to encroach on citizens property and draw increased numbers of people to our private homes and sanctuaries. Please hear the concerns of many of the residents that you represent and stop the plans for the Three Rivers Park Trail in Edina. I would greatly appreciate it if you would hold public meetings with opportunity for citizens to speak before you make any further decisions. Thank you and please contact me with questions. ue een 5524 W. 701h St. Edina, MN 55439 952 -944 -0545 Dr. Pete Franz RECEI €LU 6.635 Limerick Drive, ,UN 19 7010 Edina, MN 55,439 June 25, 2010 Mayor James Hovland: Just a brief note to advise that my wife Marion and I as well as our four adult children and their families who all live in Edina strongly support the construction and development of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. We lived in the B1akeRidge Condominiums when the Bredesen Park Trails were developed. At that time many individuals believed the construction of the Bredesen Park Trails were a waste of money and the obliteration of a nature site. Little did people realize the potential benefits of the Bredesen Park Development. Most people now living near Bredesen Park now realize the benefits of Bredesen Park. When some homes come up for sale near Bredesen the owners actually indicate in their sales brochures or comments that their houses are located near Bredesen Park. We realize that a few homes or residents may find the potential location of the Nine Mile Creek Trail to be somewhat disruptive to their homes. However, in our opinion most home owners located near the proposed Nine'Mile Creek Trail will enjoy the trail as will the majority of all Edina Citizens. We now live adjacent to Nine Mile Creek and hope the trail is developed as we would like to use the trail. We know from experience it would be much safer for children and adults who now bike or walk across the Tracy Avenue bridge to have a defined and safe pathway exclusive for biker and walker used. Sincerely, , � -3 , , J"�' e < - .2, �- /-- —, Dr. Pete Franz cc Joni Bennet cc Mary Brindle cc Scot Housh cc Ann Swenson Susan Howl Subject: FW: Pinstripes' Wood Smoke From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailto:mellum.julie @gmail.com) RECEIVED Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:10 PM JUN 2 9 2010 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Pinstripes' Wood Smoke Please send this "reminder' email to Mayor Hovland and City council members in light of the forthcoming Planning Commission meeting Wed. nite. Julie Mellum Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has recently added a new step to the GreenStep Cities program, that of Local Air Quality. Due to the hazards of wood smoke to human health, to the global environment, and to our urban forest, the Air and Water Quality Working Group (AEWG) of the Energy and Environment Commission has been studying issues related to wood smoke. Although the AEWG report on wood smoke is not yet final, I am taking the opportunity to pass along some data on wood smoke, which AEWG member, Julie Mellum has provided. I am doing so because it is my understanding that at the June 1 City Council meeting, a local restaurant will be requesting having a two story wood burning fire place. I am writing to request that City Council disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. Gas inserts for indoor fireplaces and outdoor fire rings are safer and more environmentally sound then burning wood. Wood smoke: 1. Is hazardous to human health. 2. Is a major source of carbon dioxide and black carbon soot in our atmosphere. 3. Contributes to the spread of insect -borne tree disease, such as emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease. Human Health - Wood smoke emits fine particulates that contain many of the same deadly toxins that are in tobacco smoke and vehicle exhaust. They are comprised of formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, dioxins and other noxious and persistent organic pollutants that build up in our lungs, crops and water supply. Wood smoke is more concentrated than tobacco smoke, travels farther and remains chemically active in the body longer. Everyone is at risk from wood -smoke exposure. But children of all ages['l, unborn children, the elderly, and anyone with asthma, allergies, or heart disease are in the highest -risk categories. The US Center for Disease Control states that wood smoke is a trigger for asthma attacks. Wood smoke is also implicated in cancers, reproductive birth defects and in sudden infant death syndrome. [21 A study found that people who burn wood or other "biofuels" for heat or cooking may have a heightened risk of emphysema and related lung conditions. Among non - smokers, exposure to biomass smoke was linked to a 2.5 -fold increase in the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Smokers exposed to biomass smoke, meanwhile, had a more than four -fold greater risk of COPD than non - smokers who did not burn biomass fuels at home. [3) Minnesota's antismoking ordinance allows people to go to bars and restaurants and avoid smoke, because tobacco smoke has a proven harmful effects. Yet residents have no choice but to breathe outdoor air that smells of wood smoke in most neighborhoods and in public spaces —at all times of day, in all seasons. It can even enter homes through windows, vents and cracks.�41 Wood smoke interferes with the right to use and enjoy one's own property. Black Carbon Soot - The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to set limits on black carbon, a/k/a "soot." Generated from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, black carbon is a solid particle-that warms the atmosphere because its dark color absorbs heat -- both when it accumulates in the air, raising the air's temperature, and when it lands on snow and ice, accelerating melting. Black carbon also has profound effects on public health, causing hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year. 151 Forestry Issues - Gas fireplaces and gas fire rings reduce the number of trees that must be destroyed for fuel; trees help absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. The head of the United Nations Environment Program is pushing for measures to slash non - carbon dioxide greenhouse gas pollutants, including black carbon, "because they make up some 50 percent of toxic atmospheric emissions ". He stressed that "The world must deplo all available means to reduce this pollution and that no substance contributing to this pollution should be overlooked." 61 The movement of firewood contributes to the spread of tree pathogens. Emerald ash borer will soon be killing trees in Edina. According to a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) document, "America's neighborhoods are under attack. The emerald ash borer lives in firewood. Move firewood and you spread the destruction. "1' Reducing wood burning in Edina will reduce the use of firewood and thereby reduce the spread of emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease as well as any other pathogen that could be spread via firewood. In summary — Please disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. 111 Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http: / /www.sciencedaily.com/ releases /2009/11/091106084243.htm. Z "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. 3 New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: //bumingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?f =11 &t =3497. 4 "Facts about burning wood; Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. 5 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/ center /articles /2010 /los- angeles- times- 02 -22- 2010.html. 6 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org/apps/ news /story.asp ?NewsID = 31952 &Cr= unep &Crl ). 7 Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Dianne Plunkett Latham Member Air and Water Quality Working Group Edina Energy and Environment Commission 1'1 Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091106084243.htm. 1 �1 "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. 131 New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: /ibumingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?f =11 &t =3497. 141 "Facts about burning wood; Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. 151 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/ center /articles /2010 /los- angeles- times- 02 -22- 2010.html. 161 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org/ apps/ news /story.asp ?NewsID= 31952 &Cr= unep &Crl). 171 Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. June 28, 2010 JUN 2 9 2010 Dear Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh and Swenson; Mayor Hovland; John Keprios, and Three Rivers District staff: I am writing in support of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail that is presently being considered. I believe that the trail will benefit Edina by providing residents with more easily accessible recreational opportunities and that families with walkers, runners and bikers will use and appreciate the trail. I believe that the cost of the trail to residents will be an investment that gives us years and generations of "return" on the investment. I am a frequent user of Three Rivers District parks, particularly Hyland Park. I have found Three Rivers to do a good job of maintaining and managing their parks and recreational areas. We have a strong and experienced partner in building such a trail. My home is on Abercrombie Drive and one of the proposed routes is behind our property, along Nine Mile Creek. My support for the trail includes this route, as I believe it will enhance my neighborhood directly. In the winter months, I walk my dogs behind our home but in the summer it is difficult and unpleasant to use for recreation. The vociferous and organized opposition to this trail by some residents preceded a process of study and reflection by the community and our representatives. I think that an attractive, usable path behind my house could enhance my property value and I think that this investment is worth the cost. At present, other nearby communities offer attractive homes and more accessible multiuse recreation; delaying or nixing this trail will put Edina behind both Minneapolis and nearby suburbs when it comes to this aspect of quality of life. I trust that city council members will carefully review the route options and select one that offers residents and visitors a beautiful walk, run or ride through our community. I hope that the council will vote yes to the trail because it is a decision that is "for the greater good." Thanks for your consideration of my views. Susan K. Schultz 5217 Abercrombie Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 952.828.5593 Susan Howl Subject: FW: edina bicycle trails JUN 2 91o�n From: Greg Allison [mailto:greg_allison @ymail.com] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:03 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: edina bicycle trails To the planning commission: I live at 5829 Fairfax Ave in Edina. I support the provision of off - street bicycle trails in Edina. I ride my bicycle both for recreation and for transportation and find it difficult and dangerous to access regional trails from my home in Edina due to a lack of dedicated bicycle trails in the city of Edina. I particularly support connections to existing regional bicycle trails such as the Southwest LRT trail, including the proposed nine -mile creek regional trail and the interlachen boulevard bicycle trail. Greg Allison Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail opinion survey RECEIVED - - - -- original Message - - - -- JUN 19 7.010 From: Bryan Badzin [ mailto:b.badzin @superclean.com] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 1:32 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail opinion survey Dear John, Thanks for taking the time to talk with me at the Open House on June 22nd about the Regional Trail. Per your request that I follow up with an e-mail and as we discussed at the time, I'm very bothered by the lack of fiscal accountability going on connected with this trail. While it seems that the environmental impact has taken center stage in the debate, the people I've spoken with in Edina are most upset at the fact that our (myself and other tax payers) wages are flat or declining if we even still have a job, our house values are declining, yet amazingly, our property taxes continue to climb. At the same time, the city and county are spending money they don't have. I was very intrigued by your idea to take a public opinion poll on the trail. As I told you that night, I believe the majority of people would be against the trail if the survey included both the approximate cost overall, and the cost to each taxpayer individually. The cost doesn't need to be exact, but it does need to be on there. I was told that those in favor of building this trail refer to some earlier survey that supposedly shows a majority of people backing the trail. However to the best of my knowledge, there was no mention of both the individual and collective costs on that survey. Those pieces of information are crucial to get an accurate idea how people feel about this project. I hope this gives you the information you need to move forward getting an accurate sense of the mood of Edinians. If I can be of further in assistance in any way, please let me know. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Bryan Badzin 6656 Parkwood Road, 55436 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: BIKE PATH PROJECT - VERNON AVENUE & SURROUNDING AREA Importance: High JUI4 2 9 IN From: Jamgotch, Carol M. [ma ilto: Carol. M.Jamgotch@su pervalu.com] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:14 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: BIKE PATH PROJECT - VERNON AVENUE & SURROUNDING AREA Importance: High ATTENTION: James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle Scot Housh, Ann Swenson Mr. Hovland & Staff, I am very disappointed to hear about this Bike Project for the City of Edina. I am very much against this project. We DO NOT need any more bike paths. We have too many as it is right now. Also, in this economy, we as tax payers do not need to undertake any more expensive, especially for bike paths — how stupid! The money is not there to build and maintain more bike paths. Don't spend my money on such ridiculous projects. If you must have a legacy before you leave your position, build something that is needed, such as a food shelf or shelters for battered women & children. Something that we really need to help people in need — not a stupid bike path. Stop wasting money on unnecessary projects! Carol Jamgotch 6981 Langford Count Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail RECEIVE JUN 19 1011 From: Scott Johnson [mailto:scottmarjjohnson @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 9:13 AM To: Commissioners and Planners; Lynette Biunno Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Body of email: Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: As a 35 year Edina Resident and enthusiastic biker, I strongly support the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail route proposed through Edina. The proposed route is a logical and wise use of public land for a healthy, environmentally sound project which will be of enormous benefit to the Community and all who use it. The project involves no taking of private land, and while understandably of concern to those adjoining the path, it is a predictable public use of public lands for the public good. I urge you to follow through with this project. Sincerely Scott W. Johnson, 3209 Galleria #1402; Edina, Minn. 55435 Susan Howl Subject: FW: nine mile creek bike trail From: Tom and Catherine Beringer [mailto:theberingers @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 8:10 AM To: Commissioners and Planners; Lynette Biunno RECEIVED Subject: nine mile creek bike trail JUN 19 1010 Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I am writing to support the nine mile creek bike trail (creekside). I am thrilled with the prospect of having a safe place for my family to ride in Edina. It would be a boon to the city and its residents. Most of the surrounding communities have bike trails, and Edina has lacked this amenity. A trail connecting through to neighboring towns would be an asset to the city's residents and an attractive selling point to newcomers. A trail placed roadside would be a huge disappointment, would not be as safe or user friendly, particularly for families, and would not be used as much as a trail with more scenic views. I sincerely hope you will approve the trail with routes through parks. Sincerely, Catherine Beringer Edina resident Tom and Catherine Beringer theberingers _comcast.net RECEIVED Susan Howl JON Z 8 1010' Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Mayor Hovland, City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh and Ann Swenson and Parks Director John Keprios, and TRPD Commissioners and Senior Planner Kelly Grissman: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. Biking is becoming hugely popular in Minneapolis /St. Paul and the surrounding suburbs. We, Minnesota, are ranked the third largest state in number of bike commuters. Take a look at Google Maps for our area, clicking on the bike routes button. It is amazing to see the miles of trail! The gap in Edina is obvious to see and will only stand out more and leave us behind if we do not become a part of this trend. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. My husband and My favorite activity to do with our three children is to go for long bike rides. In fact, just yesterday we took our bikes and went up to Hugo to a trail there. We live on the East side of Edina and also quite often ride through Minneapolis down city streets to get to Lake Harriet and the other lakes riding on the bike paths as well as getting to the greenway route. With the connection of the larger trail system through Edina we would be able to get on our bicycles and start a long family bike ride in a safe and beautiful way, rather than having to ride on a bunch of city streets or haul our bikes into the car and drive for miles to achieve the same thing. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. Also, a wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Faith Rothberg Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Bike Trail RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2010 From: Goodyear, Maggie [mailto:MaggieGoodyear @edinarealty.com] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:15 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Proposed Bike Trail I am strongly opposed to a bike trail through Edina. The damage it will do to our wildlife, property values, taxes is ridiculous. We have plenty of bike paths already. The Bredeson bike path is not kept in good condition, how can we expect this proposed bike path to be kept up ?? Instead of all these assessments to homeowners for new roads and sewers, why not use the money we will spend on a bike path for something we NEED, like streets and reduce the assessments? These huge assessments do not help the sale of homes. ✓l&ie (�C' gad dean Edina Realty 6800 France Ave S. Edina, MN 55435 612- 280 -1657 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland RECEIVED JUN 2 8 1010 From: liz denn [mailto: den nfamily @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 8:53 AM To: Lynette Biunno; NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Liz Denn Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina .RECEIVED JUN 2 6 2010 From: Lana Slavitt [mailto:slavitt_lana @yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:37 AM To: ninemiletrail @threeriversparkdistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina TO: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman We support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, we believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. We believe the regional trail should run through parks which enhances the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. It is also a safer ride /walk for those of us with smaller children who routinely are forced to drive to places other than Edina to walk or bike in a natural environment. In summary, we urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Lana and Andrew Slavitt Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland From: tom reinke [mailto :sundialsolarrep @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:48 PM To: Lynette Biunno; NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org Subject: Support for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Parkland Please direct this email to: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Edina Parks Director John Keprios Three Rivers Park District Commissioners Three Rivers Park District Senior Planner Kelly Grissman Edina Mayor, City Council, Parks Director, and TRPD Commissioners: RECEIVED JUN 2 8 7010 I support the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. While the trail would require a significant investment, I believe the many recreational and practical benefits of a regional trail to Edina residents would outweigh the cost. Edina is renowned as a very high quality community. A safe, comfortable, and inviting trail for walkers, joggers, and riders of all ages and skill levels would serve to promote our unique healthy Edina lifestyle and enjoyment of Edina's parks. A wise investment in a regional trail would be an asset to the community. Recreational facilities are a decision factor for many prospective homeowners and a trail would be a selling point for Edina home sellers. I believe the regional trail should run through parks enhance the walking and riding experience, versus existing roadways which have increased levels of car exhaust and noise. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Tom Reinke Sundial Solar direct: 612 -558 -6549 email: sundialsolarrep(a,gmail.com website:www. Sundial SolarConsultants.com Susan Howl From: Sent: Cc: Subject: Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com Lynette Biunno Friday, June 25, 2010 9:09 AM Susan Howl FW: Bike Trails along 9 -Mile Creek From: Dentz Jeri [mailto:jdentz @me.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Bike Trails along 9 -Mile Creek Dear City Council Members, RECEIVED JUN 2 5 2010 I just wanted to be on the record as supporting the Three Rivers Bike trail and its proposed installation along 9- Mile Creek. I live in the Brookview Heights neighborhood which boarders 9 -Mile Creek. My husband, three children and myself would love to see a trail that is readily accessible to bikers, walkers and runners that travels through the beautiful parks of this town. Currently, we ride our bikes and run along the busy 70th/Cahill /Tracy/Valley View streets. It is a less than desirable adventure considering the traffic, exhaust fumes, and distracted drivers. In fact, I just spent $500 dollars on a new hitch for my van. Now we can use a bike rack to load our bikes up and drive to Minneapolis to enjoy their lovely trails. Does that make any sense? Please vote yes to the bike trails along 9 -Mile Creek. It would be nice to have the same wonderful trails as most of our metro neighbors. Thank you, Jeri Dentz and Family 6716 Cahill Road Edina Susan Howl Importance: High From: Donna Schoffelman [mailto:dschof @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 9:34 PM To: Lynette Biunno RECEIVED Subject: Nine Mie Creek Bike Trail Through Edina Importance: High JUN 2 5 2010 Dear City Council Members, I wish to express my great concern and displeasure with the proposal for the Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail through Edina. Spending $20 -35 million dollars in difficult economic times for anything unnecessary, such as a bike trail that can only be used approximately half the year, seems irrational, especially when the money is not currently available. Frankly, there is not one good thing about this trail through Edina. 1 - The economics are outrageous. 2 - The environmental impact is extremely negative. 3 - Safety issues are significant. The planning apparently has not considered many of the potential problems. Maps do not show all of the properties affected. The routes in Edina will cause great disruption to well - established neighborhoods, destruction of hundreds of mature trees, infringement in yards with the trail nearly abutting existing dwellings, etc. This trail will not add value to Edina homes, it will have a negative impact on property values in a struggling housing environment. My understanding is a homeowner who can see the trail from their home, will have their property value reduced by $50,000. A bike trail is not necessary for bikers to ride. Semi- professional bikers will not use the trail; they will use existing streets. Here are some of issues related to Route 2 & 3 that I do not believe have been addressed: 1 — Along Lincoln Drive (Route 3) there is United Health Care, Manor Homes of Edina, Edina West, and Fountain Woods which account for 3,000 people. These facilities are not shown on the Three Rivers Park map. Add to that Waterford Ct, Habitat Ct, Wellesly Place, Chapel Hills and the twin homes on Vernon before Gleason. United Health has about 1,100 cars twice a day going in and out. 2 — Habitat Court primarily and Waterford Court, the trail would be nearly at the dwellings. 3 — When the trail nearly abuts the dwellings, where will the power lines be? 4 —The twin homes on Vernon just before Gleason have very short driveways. Take 16 feet off the driveways and they will back out of their garage onto the bike trail. You better plan for accidents. 5 — In addition to all the traffic on Lincoln and Vernon, it is a bus route. We do not have bus shelters for rider.. especially in winter. Why not spend money on bus shelters instead of bike trails. They can be used year round. ,6 — Many people walking along Route 3 are over 65. Bikers do not slow down for walkers.. . 7 — I understand the plan is for the trail to be 16 ft wide (10 + 3 + 3) so it can be available for emergency vehicles if necessary. If the trail is along a street, the emergency vehicles could use the street. Why does the trail need to be so wide at those points? 8 — I understand if the trail goes through the wetlands (Route 2), a wooden bridge will be built. Will it be strong enough to be used by emergency vehicles? 9 — If it goes through the wetlands (Route 2), have you considered the potential for drug dealers to gather after dark and the potential for increased crime? I know the answer is No. 10 — What about refuse pickup along the trail? Who will clean it up? 11 — On Lincoln (Route 3) vehicles have gone through the fence between 169 and Lincoln because they were going too fast. This spring an tractor trailer traveling north on 169 lost the steering and went through the ditch and through the fence between Edina West and Manor Homes. Are you planning to take property from home owners? Have you done a business plan for this trail? Where can Edina residents see it? Let me be clear. Though I have given specific issues relative to routes 2 and 3, it is simply a sampling of the problems related to the entire proposal. Please cancel plans for moving ahead with this trail. I will be following your positions and informing others in Edina. Sincerely, Donna Schoffelman 6964 Langford Court Edina, MN 55436 2 RECE4`V ... oLOl t Nnr JUN 2 d LU10 03AI3038 Susan Howl From: Richard Griffith [rfgriffith @visi.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 11:04 AM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRlversParksDistrict.org Cc: Dianne Plunkett Latham; Kirk Johnson; Alice Hulbert; Donald Eyberg; David Howell Subject: Creek Trail Through Edina I am a long time Edina resident and watched the building of the suburban housing tracts in the 1960's and 1970's in the West part of our community. I was not engaged with the development and did not see the transportation problem for walkers and cyclists created by our street and bridge plans at that time. There are no sidewalks in most of Edina, causing conflict with fast moving cars for our walking residents. Anyone who walks in their Edina nieghborhood must be careful not to interfer with traffic. There is little to encourage biking on Edina streets. Few streets have bike lanes, because there was no plan to include them. Biking to work, school or to any place is a test of will, where the biker has to assert their right to part of the street against fast moving cars. This is not a fair contest and several accidents and deaths have shown the need for more definition of biking paths, hopefully off the auto traffic paths. The Nine Mile Creek path through Edina will complete the linking of our cycling /walking paths with Hopkins, St. Louis Park, Bloomington and Eden Prairie, resulting in a safe and useful alternate to driving our cars everywhere. I am sure there are Edina residents with strong feeling about not having the path in their backyard, having had the sole use of public creek land for decades. I hope that they can come to enjoy the freedom and beauty provided by the new creek path. Richard Griffith 7009 Comanche Court Edina, MN 565439 ph: 952 941 -3738 ALL TO ACTION REGARDING THE REGIONAL BIKE TRAIL ! ! ! Cime is short! Now is the time to take action. To even have a chance to stop this trail along the creek, Edina and pin County residents, need to step up, in mass, now! 7VHAT TO DO TO HELP ASAP: We need everyone to show up and voice their opinion at the following meetings: Cuesday, June 22nd, 6:00 — 8:30 — Southview Middle School, 4725 South View Lane, Edina JVednesday, June 30th, 5:00 — 7:30 — Same location XIIAT ELSE YOU CAN DO TO HELP: 1. E -mail this letter to everyone on your e-mail address list and ask them to forward it on to everyone on their E -mail address list. The more people the better. Tell all your friends and neighbors. !. Write or E -mail City Council members with your concerns. In addition, request that they hold public meetings )efore they make any decisions. Phone calls will not be counted, only contact in writing. Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50`t' St. Edina, MN 55434 E -Mail: edinamailgci.edina.mn.us Phone . #: 952- 927 -8861 ayor: James Hovland 612 - 874 -8550 cil Member: Joni Bennett 952 -927 -0661 Council Member: Mary Brindle 952- 941 -7746 Council Member: Scot Housh 763 - 302 -7174 Council Member: Ann Swenson 952- 927 -7524 3. Write or E -mail Three Rivers Park District Board of Advisors with your concerns. In addition, request that they cold public hearings NOT just informational public meetings. Three Rivers Park District E -mail: NineMileTrail (QThreeRiversParkDistrict.org Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Phone #: 763 -559 -9000 3000 Xenium Lane North www.threeriversparks.org Plymouth, MN 55441 1. E -mail State Representative Keith Downey District 41A Edina. He believes in controlling spending. rep.keith. downey(2house.mn 5. E -Mail Congressman Erik Paulsen, MN 3rd District Go to his web site: Paulsen.house.gov Then go to "Contact Erik" in the upper right corner. 5. Write an editorial to the Star and Tribune and/or the Sun Newspapers www.startribune.com and click on "opinion" then "editorial" www.mnsun.com Left side of page click on Edina, then on right side of page click on "letter to Editor" 7. Sign the Petition, go to: www.9milecreek.ora. Tell all your friends and neighbors to do the same. 3. You can view all of the assemssments done by 3 Rivers Park District at: Southdale Library, Edina Community Library, Edina City Hall, Three Rivers Park District. WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THE VARIOUS ASSESSMENTS MUST BE SENT TO THE PARK DISTRICT BY 4:30 PM WEDNESDAY, JULY 14, 2010. Written form only will be accepted. (i _ a have questions feel free to contact Pete McCarthy your segment representative. 512- 812 -1025 cell )etemccarthy 11 @gmail.com 6809 Brook Drive Edina, MN 55439 July, 22, 2010 James Hovland Edina city Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55434 Dear Mr. Hovland, RECEIVED JUN 2 4 2010 I am writing to ask you to DISCONTINUE ALL PLANS to add a regional bike trail to the city of Edina. Adding a bike trail to our already fully established community is fiscally, environmentally and socially irresponsible. At a time in which we are experiencing an extremely unstable economy, local government cannot justify spending an estimated $951.00/ft for a trail which will serve less than 25 percent of the city population. The trail, as proposed, is to be located in a floodway and flood plain and will unnecessarily strain the environment, stress plant life and endanger animals through destruction of the natural habitat. The state of Minnesota already has more miles of bike trails than any other state. This makes it completely unnecessary to subject the residents you represent to three to four years of disruption during construction of bridges, raised boardwalks, traffic intersections and obtaining easements to cross private property for construction. The majority of your constituents do NOT want this trail. You have a responsibility to serve the public will through wise use of public monies, care for the environment and concern for social welfare. Please DISCONTINUE ALL PLANS to add a regional bike trail to the city of Edina. Sincerely, C 047 Anne Klug Susan Howl Subject: FW: bike trail RECEIVED JUN 2 4 2010 Subject: bike trail Dear Mayor Hovland, Please forward a copy of this email to each of the Council members. I am writing to ask you to scrap the plans for the proposed bike trail through Edina, for the following reasons: It is exceedingly expensive (no matter where the money comes from). It encroaches on many citizens of our city. I believe that a majority of the citizens are against this proposal. Thank you for hearing my concerns. Again, please scrap this proposal!!! Feel free to contact me, if you have any questions. Thanks, Ted Steen 5524 West 70th Street Edina, MN 55439 -952- 944 -0545 Go Green! # 1 Energy Pick Think Big oil has a future? AEGY - Think Green, Renewable Energy! http• / /thirdDartyoffers iuno com/ TGL3131 /4c237916d8l3O4cOe68stO3vuc 1 A Note From... Mr. Louis O. Wemeke lt,,. k i*e, ,,L gr"_ -5, JZ,•�:.e,.. a 4ry �- eau. -�"d r} ,fxR—, 2 - tee. - r-w ¢ j Rr A -Note From... Mr. Louis O. Wemeke �L P � -.�-�. �•.�,- c�..L -�- -mac. A- rk - � z A� Na RECEIVED JUN 2'- -1010 Susan Howl Subject: FW: support for 9 mile creek trail From: alihul @aol.com [mailto:alihul @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:51 PM To: NineMileTrail @ThreeRiversParkDistrict.org; Lynette Biunno Subject: support for 9 mile creek trail Three Rivers Park District Commissioners and Planners, I have recently completed serving on the CAT analysis group for the 9 Mile Creek Trail. I must first commend Kelly Grissman on her professionalism and patience, and on the very high quality report she has produced. She has done a tremendous job! Attempting to find a quantifiable way to compare trail segments is difficult. In some ways it is a science, requiring that reproducible measurements are identified. But I believe that designing a trail is also an art, with beauty identified by the beholder. When riding along the beautiful and extremely popular Dakota Rail Trail, did you happen to notice how many driveways you crossed, how many yards you passed, or what distance the lot line was to the trail edge? Did you even notice that you passed any houses at all? I notice the marshes, the bridges, the boats on the lake, and bad shots off the tee at the golf course. The houses are pretty much a blur along the way. My point is that a trail, like a park, is a place for people to interact with nature and experience the world around them. There was no way for the CAT group to develop a way to attach such a value to the trail options. When the trail is completed the numbers that we have compiled for the CAT report will become insignificant to everyone who uses the trail. They will only see the marshes, the bridges, and the creek. The houses will just become a blur along the way. Keep the trail on the wetland segments! Thanks! Alice Hulbert Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners Sara Wyatt District 1 June 21, 2010 The Honorable James B. Mayor of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Hovland T'hreeRivers PARK DISTRICT RECEIVED JUN 24' 1010 RE: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Preliminary Planning Costs and Anticipated Funding Sources Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 • www.ThreeRiversParks.org Dear Mayor Hovland: This letter is in response to your request for additional information on the estimated Marilynn Corcoran, District z cost for constructing -the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in comparison to other completed Three Rivers Park District (Park District) projects, and the anticipated funding sources for trail construction. The information we're providing has been compiled by Kelly Grissman, Senior Manger of Planning for Three Rivers. Mark Haggerty District 3 The preliminary planning estimate for constructing 7 -8 miles of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is $17 -20 million. The estimate includes all "typical" trail construction expenses in addition to anticipated boardwalks; bridges over Nine Mile Creek, Highway 62, and Highway 100; a tunnel under the Canadian - Pacific Railroad; utility Dale Woodbeck, relocation; several areas of road reconstruction; and all associated consulting Vice Chair services. District 4 The estimated cost is reflective of constructing a new regional trail in a fully developed community, and is similar to the anticipated costs of constructing new regional trails in other first -ring communities. If construction proceeds as planned, Rosemary Franzese this will be the most expensive regional trail Three Rivers has ever built. District 5 At this time, the Park District anticipates utilizing a variety of funding sources to construct Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, including the following: Larry Blackstad, Chair Appointed • The Park District anticipates preparation of grant submittals from the Surface Transportation Program /Transportation Enhancement (STP/TE) federal funding programs. Three Rivers has been successful in securing funds from these programs for several other regional trail projects, including the Intercity Trail in Richfield, the Crystal Lake Trail in Robbinsdale, the Luce Line Trail Bridge in Barbara Kinsey Appointed Plymouth, and the Lake Minnetonka Trail Bridge in Shorewood. • The Park District is prepared to issue bonds for the 20 percent federal funding program local match requirement, or for trail construction costs in which federal Cris Gears funds were not received. Superintendent Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 • www.ThreeRiversParks.org • Upon completion of a master plan, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will be eligible for the Metropolitan Council's Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program. The Park District anticipates utilizing this funding source, along with the Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program and other funding sources to offset the Park District's potential bonding requirements. • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has indicated that it will assist _with funding trail construction costs for creek -based routes when constructed in conjunction with future creek restoration work. • The Park District will continue to collaborate with the City of Edina and other agencies with jurisdictional control over the road -based routes, as appropriate, to construct the regional trail in conjunction with planned road improvement projects to maximize cost efficiencies. I hope that this information adequately addresses your questions. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any additional questions or concerns at 763.559.6748. Sin rely, Z4&14_1 Cris Gears Superintendent C: Larry Blackstad, Board Chair Dale Woodbeck, Commissioner (District 4) John Keprios, Park & Recreation Director, City of Edina Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning Donald J. DeVeau, Director, Department of Planning and Development Susan Howl Subject: FW: Three Rivers Regional Trail RECEIv ED JUN 14 In From: suesteen.l @juno.com [mailto:suesteen.l @ juno.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:43 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Three Rivers Regional Trail Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I am writing to ask you to please abort the plans to construct the Regional Trail. After attending last nights meeting at South View I am even more perplexed and unhappy with the plans for the trail. The excessive amount of spending, destruction of the environment and infringement on citizens property all lead to one obvious conclusion. The trail should not be built. Please consider my thoughts and contact me with questions. Sincerely, Sue Steen 32 year Edina resident and home owner Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please distribute to Mayor Hovland and the City Council of Edina Attachments: I oppose building a bike trail.pdf RECEIVEV From: Debbie Janey [mailto:Debbie.Janey @mtyale.com] JUN 131010 Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:36 PM _ To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please distribute to Mayor Hovland and the City Council of Edina Dear Mr. Mayor and Edina City Council members, I am a recreational athlete and feel so fortunate to live in a community that supports healthy living. However, for the reasons outlined in the attached letter I do not support the construction of the Nine Mile Creek Bikeway through Edina. Thank you for your consideration. DE3BIE L. JANI=Y ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT MOUNT YALE CAPITAL gizoup, LLC 8000 NORMAN CENTER VRIVE SUITE 630 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55437 UNITED STATES rELE PONE: +1 952.897.5390 FAx: +1 952.897.5391 EMAIL: DEB8IE.TANEYC@MTYALE.COM June 23, 2010 Edina City Offices 4801 W. 50th St. Edina MN 55424 e -mail: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE FOLLOWING: Edina Park & Recreation Department, John Keprios and Park Board members Three Rivers Park District, Kelly Grissman Senior Manager of Planning with Three Rivers Park District, Jonathan Vlaming City Council: Mayor James Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson I oppose building a bike trail on 9 Mile Creek because: Habitat, environment — From Valley Lane to Creek View Lane to 70th St., the woods and wetlands are home to many species of birds, frogs, turtles and more. Blazing a 16- foot -wide trail would destroy habitats and add to pollution. Flooding — The creek often overflows into yards. A trail would damage or ruin wetlands and floodplains and likely exacerbate flooding woes for homeowners. Safety — If a path is built, we question the safety for adjacent homes and schools. Estimated number of trail users is 500,000 per year, which would bring many visitors close to our schools, and thus add safety concerns for parents. Budget and priorities — This isn't the time for such a big - ticket project. The state budget deficit stands at more than $4.27 billion, much of that affecting our schools. As budget cuts loom for Valley View Middle School and Edina High, a bike trail isn't a necessity. This proposal jeopardizes the environment of one of the city's most pristine wildlife areas and it would negatively affect the people and wildlife along its path. Sincerely, ",J- Z. Deborah L. Janey 6898 Langford Dr Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl . Subject: FW: nine mile creek regional trail RECEIVED JUN 131010 From: Mark Badenhoff [mailto:mwb1010 @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:31 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: keith downey Subject: nine mile creek regional trail Dear Edina Council Members, Mayor Hovland & Rep Downey & Rep Paulsen: I am a long time Edina resident and want to express my concern regarding the proposed bike trail along nine mile creek. I am strongly opposed to spending 35,000,000 given our current budget shortfalls at the local, state and federal level. We have plenty of alternatives to ride our bicycles presently. Spending 35,000,000 dollars seems foolish at best and criminal at worst. Frankly, I can't even believe it's being considered given the current state of our financial affairs. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Mark Badenhoff Edina, Mn 952- 914 -9415 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail RECEIVED Importance: High JUN 1 3 2Q10 TO THE MAYOR OF EDINA AND THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL: My wife, 3 children and I reside at 5700 Camelback Drive in Edina, approximately 2' /Z blocks from Walnut Ridge Park. I am xAriting to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed bike trail that (as currently conceived) will abut and/or traverse the Nine Mile Creek watershed and Walnut Ridge Park. What is most alarming to me personally is the impact that this trail will have on our neighborhood streets on which our kids play and ride their bikes and our neighbors gather, visit, walk dogs, etc. I am very concerned that this trail will result in a material increase in non - resident traffic into what is entirely a residential area. A very good share of the people (other than those coming from the west off Hwy 169, trail users who will greatly impact our neighbors on Londonderry, Dovre, Continental etc.)) will likely use Schaefer Road, Stauder Circle, Deville, Continental, and even Camelback Drive to access the trail. Has the Edina City Council been engaged in the process of planning, approving and/or cooperating with this proposal? If so, what if any studies have been done on the likely impact on traffic on our neighborhood streets? Given the estimates of trail usage that I have seen, I am very fearful that the impact on our neighborhood traffic (and on- street parking) will be material and will consist almost entirely of people with no connection whatsoever to our neighborhood. These concerns translate immediately into material safety concerns for our kids. Walnut Ridge is a jewel and a cherished part of our neighborhood. Throughout the year. kids of all ages meet and play there, and neighbors meet and visit at the park, further strengthening our terrific neighborhood. Turning this park into a magnet for hundreds of thousands of bikers each year will spell the end to what is currently a safe, guarded and much loved neighborhood haven for our kids and will devalue (both objectively and emotionally) our homes and neighborhood. My neighbors have many additional concerns, and I do not purport to represent anybody's views other than my own. That being said, I have discussed this communication with many of them (who to my knowledge are united and passionate in their opposition to this project), and will share any response from you with all of them. I appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you. Matt Thompson LAWYER BIOGRAPHIES I PRACTICE EXPERIENCE I CONTACT US FA E G R E Matthew L. Thompson, Partner Faegre l* Benson LLP BENSON 2200 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3901 612 - 766 -6854 / FAX 612 - 766 -1600 MThompson@faegre.com Biography I Download My Contact Info as V -Card I www.faegre.com Susan Howl Subject: FW: Regional Trail- -not a reasonable investment RECEIVED JUN 13 2010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Daniel Stenoien [mailto:dmstenoien @visi.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:21 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: ninemiletrail @threeriversparkdistrict.org Subject: Regional Trail- -not a reasonable investment To all: As.an Edina resident for 42 years, and a serious biker, I want to go on record concerning the proposed trail thru Edina. In the light of important alternatives for investment in our city and region, this project does not make economic sense. Please use good judgement in this case and cancel or postpone the project. Yours truly, Daniel M. Stenoien 5812 Creek Valley Rd, Edina 55439 1 Susan Howl Subject: Proposed Bike trail RECEIVED Dear City Council Members and Mayor Hovland, JUN 2 2 2010 I have been an Edina resident since 1995. I live at 6960 Langford Court in the Manor Homes of Edina complex, along the frontage road running parallel to Hightway 169. My condominium unit abuts one of the proposed sections for the Three Rivers Park District bike trail, Route 3. I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed bike trail tfhrough Edina for the following reasons: 1. It's expensive, and will require additional tax levys or assessments to fund. When the trail was discussed at the October 2009 town hall meeting at Centennial Lakes, Mayor Hovland stated that the bike trail would allow our community to experience the benefit of the funds the City was paying to the Three Rivers Park District. His comments created the impression that the trail would not result in additional taxes or levys. It's my understanding that construction of the trail will actually result in a $35 million debt, and that the City will be responsible for annual maintenance of $183,000. This amount is likely to increase over time. As a taxpayer, I am opposed to an additional assessment or levy , particularly for a project that will likely damage my property values, and not improve my quality of life. 2. The Park District claims a projected 500,000 people will use the trail. It's hard to say whether that many people would use the trail, but assuming that is the case, such high volume is not a benefit. Would you want 500,000 people biking within 25 feet of your home? Would you buy a home in such a location? Contrary to the opinions of supporters, the trail will damage the liveability of the neighborhoods through which it will run, not enhance it. With 500,000 cyclists using the path, would you feel safe walking on it? 3. Building the trail will require significant destruction of trees and rerouting of utilities, disrupting the lives of those of us along the proposed route. We have no means of impacting the construction of this bik path. It will require private citizens to pay for necessary screening. 4. No one has determined how bicyclists will safely cross major throughfares like Vernon Avenue, or 70th Street. The proposed section of the trail along Lincoln Drive, Route 3, will require that the trees along the existing sidewalk be removed, and willl eliminate the flower beds at the entry for my condominium complex. Our complex is one of several condominium or townhome developments along Route 3. These complexes all have entrys along Lincoln Drive which are the only means of accessing the road. The trail will also cross the United Healthcare entrance, which so busy most weekday mornings I avoid walking by it. No one has proposed a means of handling the bike traffic that will cross these areas. 5. United HealthCare plans to erect an additional building on its property in the Opus complex in Minnetonka on the north side of Highway 169, immediately across from our complex . This will result in at least 1, 250 additional vehicles travelling to and from their business. The planned widening of the bridge over Hwy 169 does not include plans for expanding or improving the exit and entrance ramps onto 169. The result will be even more traffic along Lincoln Drive. In the last year, we have had multiple accidents in whihc vehicles have veered off 169 and crashed into the chain link fence along the frontage road. Why add increased bike traffic to the mix? I read the Sunday June 20th article in the Star Tribune with some interest. Aside from some blatant inaccuracies, I was struck by Ms. Grissman's comment that the Park District regards the Edina section as a necesary part of their plan for a bike trail to Wildlife Refuge in Bloomington. Clearly the Park District has already decided that, regardless of citizen input or opposition, they intend to incur this debt and pursue this project. I am quite sure bicyclists can continue to find their way to Bloomington without this expensive, destructive development. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Carolyn Peterson, 952 - 938 -1563 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Regional Bike Trail RECEIVED JUN 2 2 2010 From: Kurt King [mailto:kurtking @mac.com] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:06 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Regional Bike Trail To: Mayor and Council Members During the council meetings last year I presented a slide show of the Nine Mile Creek area proposed for the bike trail and pointed out the many mature trees that will need to be cut down to make room for the bike path. With Edina having so little green area, I am still opposed to the destruction of our wetlands. The street bike path is a better alternative as it does not reduce our green area. I urge you not to accept the Three Rivers proposal to put the bike path near Nine Mile Creek. Kurt King 6800 Brook Drive Edina, MN 55439 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Seven mile bicycle trail through Edina RECEIVED JUN 18 2010 From: Linda Dornbach [mailto:lydornbach @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 2:08 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Seven mile bicycle trail through Edina To Whom It May Concern, We are writing to express our GREAT concern with unnecessary spending on a bike trail through our neighborhoods and community of Edina. It is pure craziness to take on more debt in today's economic climate. This bike path is not an investment in Edina, but a door opening to outside residents (non tax paying) to come through our neighborhoods and use a path that they are not paying for in construction or future maintenance. Let's not forget the invitation it creates for safety issues!!!! The path running through Walnut Ridge Park will expose so many young children to unsafe conditions. Have you even considered this aspect ?!! Hundreds of Edina children use that park for La Crosse practice & games, playing on equipment, biking and rollerblading, etc., without the huge worry of added traffic coming from outside of Edina. We would not feel that the safety of children are insured with exposing them to so many more people coming through our neighborhood! Whose best interest does this bike path really cater to? It sounds like a select few who don't even live in Edina. This is an established community, not one that is being newly developed with a bike path in mind. Please allow Edina residents to be heard and accounted for in this decision. It negatively impacts us the most through added on community debt and hazardous safety issues! Sincerely, Greg and Linda Dornbach 6213 S. Knoll Drive Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Three Rivers Park Dist. Bike Trail through Edina RECEIVED JUN 161010 From: Diane Lysen [ mailto :dlysen @directbenefits.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:25 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Wright Debbie; TMAMGMT @aol.com; Susan Barkley; JoAnne Mason; Rebecca Reinhold; Joyce Johnson; Goodyear, Maggie; dandy @good.org Subject: Three Rivers Park Dist. Bike Trail through Edina Can you pleas confirm who my City Council member is? My address is 6813 Langford Dr, Edina, MN 55436. 1 would like to discuss the $35,000,000 cost of a bike trail to connect other bike trails in Hopkins and Richfield. In this economy, and with state and federal finances being in dire straights, this is an obnoxious amount of money to spend on something so frivolous as 7 miles of bike trails. Does our City Council and Mayor realize that $35,000,000 could support 150 teachers for 5 years? This isn't about bike trails. This is about frivolous spending of tax payer dollars for non - essential items. The City of Edina will end up maintaining these bike trails to the estimated tune of $183,000 per year and that's just to start with. We all know that amount will escalate with each passing year. That's 3 teacher salaries a year - - - -or police officers - - - -or fire department personnel. Anyone is Minnesota that wants to bike already has 91 miles of bike trail within the Three Rivers district, and 11 miles of trails in Edina. Enough is enough. The City Council can't possibly think that the estimated 500,000 bikers per year that would pass through would add to the economy of Edina? Are these bikers going to be stopping to shop and spend money in Edina? Please. This is typical of government, whether it's city, county, state, or federal. The new math is to spend what we don't have. Keep the printing presses running and just print more money-- - - - - -- -and evidently build bike trails with funny money. Please pass this on to my council member. We are tired of fighting city hall and would like our voices heard at a special hearing ---- -not just the 3 minutes that we would get at a council meeting. A response will be appreciated to all copied on my e-mail list. We are all concerned neighbors and will be spreading the word about the cost of this project. Diane Lysen 6813 Langford -Dr. Edina, MN 55436 Direct Benefits, Inc. 'D am,e F,100n iktgaale Lresew r'+ Diane B. Lysen Eastern Region, Group Sales Rep 325 Cedar St. Suite 800 St. Paul, MN 55101 Direct Dial: (651)259 -6246 Phone: (651)649 -3503 Option 1, ext. 4 Cell: (612)747 -5506 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Senior High Rise concern ii l Nnr JUN 2 s 2010 C3£ME . = W Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker; Honorable Mayor James Hovland; Council Member Joni Bennett; Council Member Mary Brindle; Council Member Scot Housh; Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown; Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter; Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer; Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest; Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel; Planning Commissioner Julie Risser; Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer; Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder; Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton It is with concern that I email you over the proposed senior high rise in the Countryside neighborhood. The thought of changing the zoning codes in order to place a complex that is the size of two football fields in the middle of a neighborhood is worrisome. One would immediately know that to build a building of this size is a poor idea in just looking at the size of the streets, the amount of traffic that is already in that area, and the location of the building. The high volume of traffic this will create will destroy this neighborhood in Edina. As a mom of a young family, one of the many reasons why we moved to Edina was for the neighborhoods. The quality of the neighborhoods, the size of streets running through neighborhoods, and the activities for young kids to do in neighborhoods is very appealing. If the codes are changed and this building is raised, it will only be a matter of time before more high rise buildings are put up it areas where they obviously should not be. Edina will change, and not for the good. Young families will not move to these neighborhoods. The value of homes in this area will decrease. People who were raised in Edina, like myself, will think twice before they move back to raise their families. Schools will also feel the affect of these decisions. The meeting is tomorrow night. I sincerely hope that you think of the good for neighborhoods in Edina, both in the present, but also the future. You reprepent us, your fellow citizens. It is clear that the residents do not want this to pass. I hope that you will listen to us, and do what is right for Edina and her future. Sincerely, Kristin Engman Susan Howl Subject: FW: Response to June 16, 2010 Letter from Colonial Church Land Use Task Force From: Christine Henninger [mailto: Christine .Henninger @genmills.com] RECE ED Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:04 AM To: Lynette Biunno JUN 2 9 2010 Cc: Chuck Subject: Response to June 16, 2010 Letter from Colonial Church Land Use Task Force Please forward this e-mail to Mayor James Hovland, the Members of the Edina City Council, and the Members of the Edina Planning Commission. Thank you. In its June 16, 2010 letter to the Edina City Council and Edina Planning Commission members, the Colonial Church Land Use Task Force quotes lots of statistics and percentages. They refer to neighborhood questions and concerns "responded to ", "Physical Actions Taken ", and "combining actions taken to design and size with answers respectfully delivered to the neighborhood." This all sounds good on paper. The reality of the responses and actions taken can be presented very simply. After listening to several hundred neighbors for 8 hours, Shelter Corporation reduced the square footage of this building by 15% and reduced the number of units by 7 %. This may be only my opinion, but I do not consider such reductions to be meaningful. From the beginning of this communication process with the Colonial Church Land Use Task Force, the key concerns voiced by neighbors were size, size, and size. Yes, there are other issues as well, but some of these, including traffic, and environmental, would be mitigated by building a materially smaller structure. Some of the key issues raised, such as why the Task Force did not consider other proposals with fewer units, the fact that the scale of this building is too large for the area, and that a building of this size belongs in a commercial area of Edina, were not addressed because they were characterized by the church Task Force as "opinions." The Edina Countryside neighborhood members were hopeful that by meeting in good faith, and by organizing a group that represented a large number of impacted Edina residents, the Colonial Church Land Use Task Force would respond in a meaningful and significant way with making changes to their proposed development. We do not believe that their responses to our most significant concern — size — was meaningful or in good faith. We ask that you vote no to the proposed Shelter Corporation /Colonial Church rezoning and development plan. Thank you. Chuck and Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff Place 952 - 920 -1931 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for Waters Senior Living Center pF GE CD JUN 2 9 2010 From: Cindy Stone [mailto:cls- 1 @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 4:49 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Support for Waters Senior Living Center Members of the Edina City Council: James B. Hovland, Mayor Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Scot A. Housh Ann Swenson I am writing to urge your support and approval for the Waters Senior Living Center. I believe this is an important project that will benefit Colonial Church, the surrounding neighborhood and the City of Edina. I believe that this project represents good stewardship by Colonial Church of this property. Colonial's proposal easily meets, and in many cases exceeds, city zoning requirements. Colonial has been extremely responsive to neighborhood concerns, holding extensive listening sessions and making several significant modifications to the plan. These changes include reducing the building height, the number of units and the overall square footage of the building. The Waters Senior Living Center is compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan and responsive to what seniors say they want in assisted living environments. It is estimated that 75% of the Waters residents will be moving from within three miles -- giving real meaning to the goal of aging in place. Thank you for your work on the Edina City Council and your careful consideration and support for the Waters Senior Living Center. Cindy Stone Edina resident Edina Public Schools parent Colonial Church member 6906 Paiute Circle Edina, MN 55439 952 - 946 -0822 cls -1 C@_comcast. net RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2010 Susan Howl From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto:barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:17 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker; Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina Countryside Neighborhood Electronic Petition Opposing the Colonial Church /Shelter Corp Project As Is - Please Reject It Please send this email to the Mayor, City Council, and Planning Commissioners: The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group created an electronic petition /survey on Sunday, June 21, 2010 to verify how residents were weighing in with the proposed building. Three days later 116 resident's responded, which represents approximately 183 residents because sixty -seven of the people that filled out the petition represent two people in the household. The participation indicates nearly 40% of people on our email distribution responded within three days. Also, there were some very good additional comments that residents shared that we also thought you would like to know. Again, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group opposes the Colonial Church /Shelter Corp project and we ask the Planning Commission, Mayor, and City Council to respectfully reject the Developer's Application dated May 28, 2010. Sincerely, Barbara Hoganson, 5829 Jeff Place The first 5 attachments represent the people opposed to the project with their names and addresses. The additional attachments represent people's comments to the questions, and the last one represents the electronic signatures. 6. Please indicate what you support. You may select multiple items. Please keep in mind Colonial Church has the common law right to develop their property within the zoning ordinances. Keep as residential, build single family homes and town homes 73 63% Request a small area plan - we all need to step back to determine options 63 54% 2 story, 50 -75 units, complementary in character & symmetry 66 57% 2 story, 100 units, complementary in character & symmetry 8 7% 3 story, 44 feet high, 139 units, 600 feet long 0 0% 4 story, 67 feet high, 150 units, 600 feet long original proposed building) 0 0% Other, please specify: 9 8% 10. Do you consider it to be an issue that an exception to the City of Edina's recently approved Comprehensive Plan be granted to allow for a commercial, for - profit project to be built in a residential area that was never earmarked for such change? Not at all important 0 0% Not vey important — — — 1 1% - Moderately important 1 1 Very important 11 10% Extremely important 100 88% Total 113 100% 11. Do you consider it to be an issue that the Planning Commission and City Council provided approval in just 45 days for a $44 million, upscale, apartment complex, when the largest stakeholders (2,000 homes within a mile of the proposed site representing approximately $750 million in residential property value) were not part of the process, while the Church, Developer, and City had been working together on this project for six months or longer? http://citvofedina.com/Departments/CompPlan.htm Not at all important 0 0% Not very important 0 0% important 1 1% _Moderately _ , 4 13 11% ve y 111 1N0 "L 100 88% Extremely important 114 100% Total 12. Do you continue to consider the revised proposed upscale senior apartment to be an Issue even if it is reduced to three stories, 44 feet high (a two story home is typically 25 feet tall), 139 units; but retains most of its mass, and the length, of two football fields (600 feet), in a quiet residential neighborhood? 0 0% Not at all important 0 0% Not very important 2 2% Moderately important 18 16% Very important _ Extremely important 95 83% 115 100% Total 13. Are you concerned about the proposed zoning change, and the city wide implications this zoning precedent may have on greater Edina (i.e. giving non - profit entities a zoning variance for a commercial, for - profit, high- density subdivision variance In a residential neighborhood? 0 0% No concern 0 0% Low 1 1 % Moderate -8 7% High Very NO concem 107 92% �_�_, 116 100% Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 10 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Zo o m e is ng- Su rvey! Results Overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:15 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # Response First Name Tina Last Name Bain Spouse First Name R. Clark Spouse Last Name Bain Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 51 101 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 20,18,16,14,4,3, Address 5812 Amy Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email thefoodpalette @aol.com First Name John Last Name Spanhake Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 102 Age of Children 8 Address 5701 McGuire Rd. City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email john.spanhake @iphouse.com 103 First Name Kathryn http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 10 Last Name Thorndyke Spouse First Name Keith Spouse Last Name same Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 3 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Address 5609 Hillside Court City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email kthorn0l @aol.com First Name Andrea Last Name Moonen Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 30 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 104 Age of Children 2 & soon to be born Address 5715 Tracy Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email andrea @jadetcm.com First Name Tyler Last Name Christopherson Spouse First Name Kyle Spouse Last Name Christopherson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 35 105 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 2 yrs old, 4 months old Address 5833 Eastview Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55436 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 10 Email tcchristopherson @ gmail.com First Name Mark Last Name Evenson Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 1 Average age of adults 31 Address 106 6304 Hillside Rd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email mevenson @carlsonprint.com First Name Ruth Last Name Kewitsch Spouse First Name Wayne Spouse Last Name Kewitsch Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 44 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 3 107 Age of Children 14, 12,9 Address 5624 Doron Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email rkewitsch @gmail.com Spouse's Email wkewitsch @gmail.com First Name Judith Last Name Rodgers Spouse First Name William Spouse Last Name Rodgers 108 Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) two Average age of adults 55 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 17 Address 6100 Arbour Lane http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 10 City Edina State Minnesota Zip 55436 Email jbr62 @earthlink.net Spouse's Email judith .rodgers @wayzata.kl2.mn.us First Name Susan Last Name Clark Spouse First Name Chip Spouse Last Name Howard Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 40 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 109 Age of Children 22 Address 5812 W 61st Street City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email jhoward612 @comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email jhoward6l2@comcast.net First Name William Last Name Rodgers Spouse First Name William Spouse Last Name Rodgers Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 55 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 110 1 Age of Children 17 Address 6100 Arbour Lane City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email jbr62 @earthlink.net Spouse's Email jbr62 @earthlink.net http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ ali = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 10 Other Adult Member's Email jbr62 @earthlink.net Other Adult Member's Email jbr62 @earthlink.net First Name Be rt Last Name Finsand Spouse First Name Amy Spouse Last Name Finsand Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 50 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 17 111 Address 6404 Limerick Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email bert@finsand.com Spouse's Email amy.finsand @buckconsultants.com Other Adult Member's Email finsand @bc.edu Other Adult Member's Email meredithfinsand2013 @u.northwestern.edu First Name David Last Name Bremer Spouse First Name Tianyi Spouse Last Name Bremer Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 6008 Average age of adults 112 54 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6008 Grove Circle City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email bremerda@comcast.net First Name Jan 113 Last Name Bergren Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 10 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 20,24 Address 5037 Yvonne Terrace City Edina State MN Zip 55436 First Name Jack Last Name, Hughes Spouse First Name Pamela Spouse Last Name Hughes Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 62 114 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5850 Creek Valley Road City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email jjf070445 @yahoo.com First Name Judith Last Name Harvey Spouse First Name Paul Spouse Last Name Harvey Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 42 115 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 15 Address 6608 Naomi Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email judiharv@hotmail.com First Name 116 kathleen Last Name dahlheimer http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 10 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 4801 west 60th street City edina State mn Zip 55424 Email KDahlheimer @comcast.net First Name John Last Name Huseby Spouse First Name Nancy Spouse Last Name Huseby Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 46 117 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5904 Arbour Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email hobiz @comcast.net Spouse's Email nobiz @comcast.net First Name Eric Last Name Barnum Spouse First Name Wendy Spouse Last Name Barnum Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 41 118 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 9 and 7 Address 6113 Arbour Lane City Edina State MN Zip 55436 http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_al l= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 10 Email we4barnum@comcast.net First Name Pam Last Name Rochlin Spouse First Name David Spouse Last Name Rochlin Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 46 119 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 3 Age of Children 13,12,9 Address 5704 View lane City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email pamr @rochlinlaw.com First Name Kevin Last Name McCoy Spouse First Name Anne Spouse Last Name McCoy Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 47 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 11 & 13 120 Address 5809 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email kmccoy2@comcast.net Spouse's Email annemccoy @comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email na Other Adult Member's Email na First Name Sally 121 Last Name Mays Spouse First Name Gary http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 10 Spouse Last Name Mays Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 4 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 21+ Address 5529 Countryside Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 -2503 Email techlms @gmail.com First Name burton Last Name shacter Spouse First Name beverly Spouse Last Name shacter Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 73 122 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5800 arbour avenue City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email bbshacter@comcast.net Spouse's Email bbshacter@comcast.net First Name Roy Last Name Burns Spouse First Name Allene Spouse Last Name 123 Burns Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 78 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Spouse's Email alleneburns @msn.com First Name 124 Allene Last Name Burns http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_al l= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 10 Spouse First Name Roy Spouse Last Name Burns Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 78 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5708 Warden Ave City Edina State Mn. Zip 55436 Email alleneburns @msn.com Spouse's Email roybburns @msn.com Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums Q 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page I of 10 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & zo o m e ra ng- Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:08 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # Response First Name Karen Last Name Ostman Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 48 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 1 5917 Olinger Road City Edina State Minnestoa Zip 554356 Email ostman44 @msn.com Other Adult Member's Email claricem,ostman @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email blackman77 @hotmai.com First Name Susan Last Name Keator Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 1' Average age of adults 54 Children in Edina Schools ( #) Z 0 Address 5041 Yvonne City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email chickadeedee55 @gmail.com First Name BURTON 3 Last Name SHACTER Spouse First Name BEVERLY http: // app. zoomerang. com / ReportT rintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 10 Spouse Last Name SHACTER Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 72 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 45, 47,49 Address 5800 ARBOUR AVENUE City EDINA State MN Zip 55436 Email bbshacter@comcast.net Spouse's Email same First Name Annette Last Name Kuck Spouse First Name Timothy Spouse Last Name Kuck Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 52 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 16 Address 6316 Westwood Court City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email kuckhouse@comcast.net Spouse's Email same Other Adult Member's Email Leah Other Adult Member's Email same First Name Ron Last Name Fraboni Spouse First Name Barbara Spouse Last Name Fraboni Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 68 http: // app. zoomerang. com / ReportT rintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang j Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 10 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5505 Grove street City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email Frabonimn @earthlink.net First Name Timothy Last Name Kuck Spouse First Name Annette Spouse Last Name Kuck Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 50 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 6 1 Age of Children 16,18 Address 6316 Westwood Ct City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email kuckhouse@comcast.net Spouse's Email kuckhouse@comcast.net First Name Nancy Last Name Lopez Spouse First Name Mario Spouse Last Name Lopez Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 43 7 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 7,3 Address 5420 Countryside Rd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email lopezgrubb @yahoo.com http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 10 First Name Gary Last Name Lee Address 8 5621 Wycliffe Rd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 First Name Molly Last Name Urbanski Spouse First Name Jason Spouse Last Name Urbanski Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 9 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 9,12 Address 5800 Stuart Avenue City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email urbys @comcast.net First Name Bridget Last Name Baird Spouse First Name Doug Spouse Last Name Baird Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 10 2 Age of Children 8, 5 Address 5805 W 61st St City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email bridget.baird@target.com Spouse's Email douglas.baird @bsci.com http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/.2,0:10 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 10 First Name Tim 11 Last Name Robb Average age of adults 39 First Name Brian Last Name Simmons Spouse First Name Audrey Spouse Last Name Simmons Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 41 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 12 2 Age of Children 11 and 13 Address 5813 Arbour Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email BSIMMONS55 @Comcast.Net Spouse's Email BSIMMONS55 @Comcast.Net First Name Rosemary Last Name Rustad Spouse First Name Greg Spouse Last Name Rustad Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 13 2 Age of Children 10,13 Address 5616 Grove Street City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email rkrustad@comcast.net Spouse's Email grustad @schadegg - mech.com First Name 14 Mario Last Name http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 10 Lopez Spouse First Name Nancy Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 43 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 18, 7, 4 Address 5420 Countryside Rd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email mltirado @yahoo.com First Name Lawrence Last Name Kerzner Spouse First Name Dorothy Spouse Last Name Kerzner Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 58 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 15 0 Age of Children 24,21 Address 5828 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email Lawrence. Kerzner @hcmed.org Spouse's Email DKerzner @comcast.net First Name Greg Last Name Rustad Spouse First Name Rose Spouse Last Name Rustad 16 Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 10,13 Address http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ ali= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 10 5616 Grove Street City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email grustad @schadegg - mech.com Spouse's Email rkrustad @comcast. net First Name jim Last Name sletten Spouse First Name jane Spouse Last Name sletten Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 45 17 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5906 olinger road City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email jjdts @aol.com Spouse's Email jsletten @aol.com First Name spencer Last Name turner Spouse First Name miriam Spouse Last Name turner Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 70 18 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6208 hillside rd City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email turnersal2@gmail.com Spouse's Email same First Name 19 Barbara Last Name http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 10 Hoganson Spouse First Name John Spouse Last Name Harden Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 0 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 0 Address 829 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email barbarahoganson @comcast.net Spouse's Email j.harden@comcast.net First Name timothy Last Name oshaughnessy Spouse First Name Cori Spouse Last Name oshaughenssy Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 20 38 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6308 valley view rd City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email oshag6325 @yahoo.com First Name Corrin Last Name O'Shaughnessy Spouse First Name Tim Spouse Last Name O'Shaughnessy 21 Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 37 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6308 Valley View Road City http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 10 Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email corioshaughnessy @gmail.com Spouse's Email oshag6325 @yahoo.corn First Name dorothy Last Name pool Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 1 Average age of adults 80 22 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6241 Crescent Drive City edina State mn Zip 55436 First Name Susan Last Name Chandler Spouse First Name Bruce Spouse Last Name McLellan Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 58 23 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 17 Address 5709 Hawkes Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email stcedina @aol.com First Name franz Last Name burris Spouse First Name joanne 24 Spouse Last Name burris Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 73 Children in Edina Schools ( #) http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 10 0 Address 5832 olinger blvd. City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email franzsr @aol.com Spouse's Email burrisjo @aol.com First Name Hans Last Name Koenig Spouse First Name Vaughn Spouse Last Name Koenig Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 75 25 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6209 Crest Lane City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email hkoenig@blakeschool.org Spouse's Email same Products ✓& Services I About Us ! Support/Help ! Zoomerang Forums C) 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 11 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Z O D m e ra n g- Su rvey! Results Overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:03 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # Response First Name Sue Last Name Claseb Spouse. First Name Jeremy Spouse Last Name Clasen Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 35 26 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 18 months, 3 years old Address 5600 Grove St City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email sueclasen@comcast.net First Name Eileen Last Name OShaughnessy Spouse First Name David Spouse Last Name Dahl Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 54 27 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 16,14 Address 4216 Sunnyside Rd. City Edina State MN Zip 55424 Email http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al l= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 11 oshau001 @umn.edu Spouse's Email dahlx006 @umn.edu First Name Nancy Last Name Huseby Spouse First Name John Spouse Last Name' Huseby Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 28 46 Address 5904 Arbour Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email nobiz @comcast.net Spouse's Email hobiz@comcast.net First Name Marta Last Name Melin Spouse First Name William Spouse Last Name Melin Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 29 2 Age of Children 12, 14, 16 Address 6111 Olinger Blvd. City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email martamelin @gmail.com Spouse's Email williammelin @gmail.com First Name Wayne Last Name Kewitsch Spouse First Name 30 Ruth Spouse Last Name Kewitsch Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 11 44 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 3 Age of Children 14, 12, 9 Address 5624 Doron Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email wkewitsch @gmail.com Spouse's Email rkewitsch @gmail.com First Name Xinying (Cindy) Last Name Yu Spouse First Name Xuemin Spouse Last Name Yang Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 36 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 31 1 Age of Children 6 Address 5708 Benton Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email yu_xinying @yahoo.com Spouse's Email xueminyang07@yahoo.com First Name John Last Name St. Pierre Spouse First Name Jeanne Spouse Last Name St. Pierre Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 32 Average age of adults 59 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 27,30 Address 6005 Arbour Lane City Edina State http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 1 I MN Zip 55436 Email jst.pierre@comcast.net Spouse's Email jeanne.stpierre @target.com Other Adult Member's Email 0 First Name Cindy Last Name Nelson Spouse First Name greg Spouse Last Name Nelson Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 50 33 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 12,14 Address 6120 hanson rd City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email grump007 @aol.com First Name Farkhod Last Name Salamov Spouse First Name Madinabonu Spouse Last Name Salamova Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 28 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 34 1 Age of Children 3,5 Address 5708 Hawkes terrace City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email farkhodbek@yahoo.com Spouse's Email farkhod_and_madina @yahoo.com First Name 35 Susan Last Name http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 11 Petersen Spouse First Name Jeff Spouse Last Name Petersen Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 52 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6213 Hillside Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email susanpetersen4 @comcast.net Spouse's Email Edinaitel @yahoo.com First Name Carol Last Name Burmaster Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 1 Average age of adults 67 36 Address 6012 Birchcrest Drive City Edina State Minnesota Zip 55436 Email caburmaster @gmail.com First Name Ann Last Name Compton Spouse First Name Charles Kendall Spouse Last Name Compton Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 38.5 37 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 21, 19 Address 5201 Lochloy Dr City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 11 anncompton@comcast.net Spouse's Email anncompton@comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email anncompton@comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email anncompton@comcast.net First Name Jeff Last Name Petersen Spouse First Name Susan Spouse Last Name Petersen Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 52 38 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6213 Hillside Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email edinaitel @yahoo.com Spouse's Email susanpetersen4@comcast.net First Name dadi Last Name setiadi Spouse First Name peni Spouse Last Name setiadi Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 2 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 39 14 and 8 Address 5841 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email dadi_s @yahoo.com Spouse's Email pwuriandari @yahoo.com Other Adult Member's Email Other Adult Member's Email http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 11 First Name Christine Last Name Henninger Spouse First Name Chuck Spouse Last Name Henninger Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 46 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 40 3 Age of Children 14,8, 6 Address 5816 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email christine.henninger @genmills.com Spouse's Email chashenninger @comcast.net First Name Michelle Last Name Lohrding Spouse First Name Brad Spouse Last Name Lohrding Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 41 41 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 9 &11 Address 5300 Benton Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email m.lohrding @earthlink.net First Name Mark Last Name Bourget Spouse First Name 42 Katie Spouse Last Name Bourget Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 42 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al l= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 11 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 7 and 5 Address 6203 South Knoll Dr City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email mark @bourgetimports.com Spouse's Email katycargirl@yahoo.com First Name Sally Last Name Mays Spouse First Name Gary Spouse Last Name Mays Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 35 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 43 0 Age of Children 21+ Address 5529 Countryside Rd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 -2503 Email Techlms @gmail.com Spouse's Email Fromedinatoo@comcast.net First Name Katie Last Name Bourget Spouse First Name Mark Spouse Last Name Bourget Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 44 Average age of adults 42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 7 and 5 Address 6203 South Knoll Dr City Edina State MN http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! 0... Page 9 of 11 Zip 55436 Email katycargirl@yahoo.com Spouse's Email mark@bourgetimports.com First Name Richard Last Name Conkey Spouse First Name Hallee Spouse Last Name Conkey Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 43 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5605 Tracy Ave. S. City Edina State MN Zip 55436 . Email HRconkey@comcast.net Spouse's Email HRconkey@comcast.net First Name Roger Last Name Bentley Spouse First Name Jan Spouse Last Name Bentley Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 55 46 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children adult Address 6338 Valley View Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email roger.bentley @gmail.com First Name Mary Last Name 47 Mulheran Spouse First Name Peter Spouse Last Name Mulheran http: // app. zoomerang. com/ Report/PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 11 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 50 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 19 Address 5940 Arbour Avenue City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email mmulheran @comcast.net First Name Dorothy Last Name Kerzner Spouse First Name Lawrence Spouse Last Name Kerzner Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 4 (1 votes by absentee ballot) Average age of adults 57 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 48 21 and 24 Address 5828 Jeff Place City Edina State Minnesota Zip 55436 Email dkerzner @comcast.net Spouse's Email Ikerznerl @comcast.net Other Adult Member's Email theredjeff @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email ethan.kerzner @gmail.com First Name Peter Last Name Mulheran Spouse First Name Mary Spouse Last Name 49 Mulheran Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 50 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 26,23,19 http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 1 l of 11 Address 5940 Arbour Ave City Edina State Mn Zip 55436 Email petem @sani - blast.com Spouse's Email marym @sani - blast.com First Name Erik Last Name Jensen Spouse First Name Elizabeth Spouse Last Name Jensen Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 37 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 50 0 Age of Children 2 children: 2 years and 5 months Address 5916 Olinger Boulevard City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email erik.jensen @bestbuy.com Spouse's Email elizabeth.jensen @comcast.net Products & Services I About Us I SupportlHelp I Zoomerang Forums © 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ ali = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 11 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & C z o o m e ra n g- Su rvey! Results Overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:12 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # Response First Name John Last Name Hoel Spouse First Name Emma Spouse Last Name Hoel Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 51 25 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6217 Wyman Avenue City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email johnhoel @mac.com First Name MaryAnn Last Name Meyer Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 52, 59, 20 52 Address 5805 Jeff Place City Edina State Mn Zip 55436 Email marem @mindspring.com First Name Bill Last Name 53 Johnson Spouse First Name Judy Spouse Last Name Johnson http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = .6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of I 1 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 59 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6201 Parkwood Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email bjohnsonI1938@comcast.net Spouse's Email na Other Adult Member's Email na Other Adult Member's Email na First Name Donna Last Name Callender Spouse First Name Steve Spouse Last Name Callender Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 57 54 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children n/a Address 5415 countryside rd City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email merlin1954 @aol.com First Name Clarice Last Name Ostman Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 3 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 55 Address 5917 Olinger Road City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email claricem.ostman @gmail.com http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of I 1 Other Adult Member's Email blacman77 @hotmail.com First Name Jeannie Last Name Wallschlaeger Spouse First Name Steve Spouse Last Name Wallschlaeger Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 48 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 56 2 Age of Children 16,14 Address 5621 Dale Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email jwal.lschlaeger @lifetouch.com Spouse's Email swallschlaeger@earthlink.net First Name Raymond Last Name Voss Spouse First Name Lois Spouse Last Name Voss Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 69 57 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5716 Benton Ave. City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email rayvoss @aol.com Spouse's Email loisvoss @aol.com First Name James Last Name Allen 58 Spouse First Name Elaine Spouse Last Name Allen Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 hnp:H app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 11 Average age of adults >70 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children N/A Address 5708 Wycliffe Rd. City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email allen024 @umn.edu Spouse's Email allen024 @umn.edu Other Adult Member's Email N/A Other Adult Member's Email N/A First Name Lois Last Name Voss Spouse First Name Raymond Spouse Last Name Voss Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 69 59 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5716 Benton Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email loisvoss @aol.com Spouse's Email rayvoss @aol.com First Name Steve Last Name Wallschlaeger Spouse First Name Jeannie Spouse Last Name Wallschlaeger 60 Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 48 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 14, 16 Address 5621 Dale Ave http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 11 City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email swaIlschlaeger@Iifetouch.com Spouse's Email jwallschlaeger @lifetouch.com First Name Gary Last Name Griffiths Spouse First Name Barbara Spouse Last Name Griffiths Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 50s Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 61 21 Address 5844 Creek Valley Rd City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email creekvalleyl@comcast.net Spouse's Email same Other Adult Member's Email same Other Adult Member's Email same First Name Linda Last Name Enck Spouse First Name Steven Spouse Last Name Enck Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 62 50 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 9,9 Address 5700 Benton Avenue City Edina State MN Zip 55436 http: / /app.zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 11 Email slamenck@comcast.net Spouse's Email slamenck@comcast.net First Name Elizabeth Last Name Beer Spouse First Name James Spouse Last Name 63 Beer Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 60 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Spouse's Email jbeer5804 @gmail.com First Name Phil Last Name Bohrer Spouse First Name Jean Spouse Last Name McDowall Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 52 64 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5900 Amy Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email philipjbohrer @yahoo.com Spouse's Email jmcdowall@daymon.com First Name PAUL Last Name BELVEDERE Spouse First Name GAIL Spouse Last Name BELVEDERE Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 65 2 Average age of adults 75 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 58, 52, 46, 44 Address 5824 CREEK VALLEY RD City EDINA http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of l 1 State MN Zip 55439 -1212 Email velvytooth @aol.com Spouse's Email velvytooth @aol.com Other Adult Member's Email velvytooth @aol.com Other Adult Member's Email velvytooth @aol.com First Name peggy Last Name dodge Spouse First Name david Spouse Last Name dodge Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 66 60 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6117 sherman circle City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email pegdodge@comcast.net First Name Rosemary Last Name Sundin Spouse First Name N/A Spouse Last Name N/A Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 1 Average age of adults 67 47 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5805 Tracy Avenue City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email rsundin @ormanguidance.com First Name Kirk 68 Last Name Swenson Spouse First Name kris http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of 11 Spouse Last Name Swenson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 46 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 9,11 Address 5924 Amy Dr City Edina State MN Zip 55436 First Name Inna Last Name Hays Spouse First Name Spouse Last Name Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 1 Average age of adults 74 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 69 0 Address 5857 Creek Valley Road City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email innaci @aol.com Spouse's Email Other Adult Member's Email Other Adult Member's Email First Name Paul Last Name Axt Spouse First Name Anita Spouse Last Name 70 Axt Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 5 Average age of adults 32 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 18, 21, 24 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 11 Address 6109 Olinger Boulevard City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email pauljaxt @gmail.com Spouse's Email awaxt @earthlink.net Other Adult Member's Email emma.axt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email axtxx010 @umn.edu First Name Rachel Last Name Axt Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 5 Average age of adults 32 Address 6109 Olinger Boulevard 71 city Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email axtxx010 @umn.edu Other Adult Member's Email pauljaxt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email awaxt @earthlink.net First Name Eleanor Last Name Axt Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 5 Average age of adults 32 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 72 6109 Olinger Boulevard City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email eleanor.axt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email pauljaxt @gmail.com Other Adult Member's Email awaxt @earthlink.net First Name 73 Michael Last Name Lonergan http: // app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al l= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of l 1 Spouse First Name Jayne Spouse Last Name Lonergan Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 60 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 32,36,40 Address 5812 Olinger Blvd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email pepintl @msn.com First Name Tracey Last Name Illies Spouse First Name Tom Spouse Last Name Illies Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 44 74 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 4 Age of Children 8,8, 11, 14 Address 5200 west 61st Street City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email ttillies @aol.com First Name Kristin Last Name Engman Spouse First Name Jonathan Spouse Last Name Engman 75 Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 36 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 8 and 6 Address 5236 West 56th Street http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 11 of 1 l city Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email Kristinengman @yahoo.com Spouse's Email engm0003 @umn.edu Products & Services I About Us I SupportlHelp I Zoomerang Forums © 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 11 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & 7 Z o o m P ra lid;" Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/24/2010 9:13 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the information that is applicable) # Response First Name jane Last Name sletten Spouse First Name jim Spouse Last Name sletten Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 45 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 76 0 Age of Children 22,24 Address 5906 olinger road City edina State mn Zip 55436 Email jsletten @aol.com Spouse's Email jjdts @aol.com First Name Marlys Last Name Husebo Spouse First Name Manford Spouse Last Name Husebo Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 77 Average age of adults 70+ Children in Edina Schools ( #) None Age of Children NA Address 6232 Oriole Lane City Edina State Minnesot http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 11 Zip 55436 First Name John Last Name Harden Spouse First Name Barbara Spouse Last Name Hoganson Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 78 59 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5829 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email j.harden @comcast.net First Name ying Last Name qi Spouse First Name zhiyong Spouse Last Name zhang Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 79 1 Age of Children 11 Address 6101 olinger blvd City edina State minnesota Zip 55436 Email celiayinggi @gmail.com Spouse's Email zhiy_zhang @yahoo.com First Name Gayle Last Name Gaumer Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 80 3 Average age of adults 34 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 5209 Lochloy Drive http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 3 of 11 City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email wilsonlawfirm @msn.com First Name zhiyong Last Name zhang Spouse First Name ying Spouse Last Name qi Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 81 1 Age of Children 11 Address 6101 olinger blvd City edina State minnesota Zip 55436 Email zhiy_zhang @yahoo.com Spouse's Email celiayinggi @gmail.com First Name Philip Last Name Johnson Spouse First Name Dorinda Spouse Last Name Johnson Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 3 Average age of adults 82 41 Address 5045 Yvonne Terrace City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email philndodie @comcast.net Spouse's Email philndodie @comcast.net First Name Emma 83 Last Name Axt Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 5 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 4 of 11 Average age of adults 32 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6109 Olinger Blvd City Edina State Minnesota Zip 55436 Email emma.axt @gmail.com First Name Joyce Last Name Sutherland Spouse First Name Jim Spouse Last Name Sutherland Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 75 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 84 0 Age of Children Adults Address 6104 Westridge Blvd. City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email j.sutherland2@comcast.net Spouse's Email same First Name Elizabeth Last Name Jensen Spouse First Name Erik Spouse Last Name Jensen Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 85 35 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 2 and 6 mo Address 5916 olinger blvd City Edina State Mn Zip 55436 http: / /app.zoomerang.com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 5 of 11 Email Elizabeth.jensen@comcast.net Spouse's Email Erik.jensen @bestbuy.com First Name Kristina Last Name Bohrer Spouse First Name Kevin Spouse Last Name Bohrer Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 86 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 7,9 Address 5605 Dale Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email ktasbohrer @yahoo.com First Name Matthew Last Name Headrick Spouse First Name Cassandra Spouse Last Name Headrick Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 35 87 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 (ECFE and Preschool) Age of Children 2 and 4 Address 5920 Amy Drive City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email cmuldoon2001 @yahoo.com First Name Stephen Last Name Nerg 88 Spouse First Name Jessica Spouse Last Name Berg Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 http: / /app.zoomerang -com/ Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 6 of 11 Average age of adults 33 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 (future) Age of Children 3 & 7mo. Address 5820 Olinger BLVD City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email Ninetwenty @earthlink.net First Name Anne Last Name McCoy Spouse First Name Kevin Spouse Last Name McCoy Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 47 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 89 2 Age of Children 11 & 13 Address 5809 Jeff Place City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email annemccoy@comcast.net Spouse's Email kmccoy2 @comcast.net First Name Anne Last Name Murray Spouse First Name George Spouse Last Name Edmonson Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 90 Average age of adults 53 Address 6621 Iroquois Trail City Edina State Mn Zip 55439 Email amurray @cdrg.org http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 7 of 11 Spouse's Email amurray @cdrg.org First Name Kent Last Name Gravelle Spouse First Name Holly 'Spouse Last Name Gravelle Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 91 0 Age of Children n/a Address 5609 Tracy Ave. City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com Spouse's Email hollygravelle @aol.com First Name Holly Last Name Gravelle Spouse First Name Kent Spouse Last Name Gravelle Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 40 92 Children in Edina Schools ( #) no Address 5609 Tracy Avenue City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email hollygravelle @aol.com Spouse's Email kentgravelle @aol.com First Name Bryan Last Name Rhody 93 Spouse First Name Stephanie Spouse Last Name Rhody Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print _ al l= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 8 of l l Average age of adults 34 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Age of Children 1, 3 Address 6319 Valley View Rd City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email rhodys @msn.com First Name David Last Name Henry Spouse First Name Karen Spouse Last Name Henry Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 4 Average age of adults 30' 94 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 at Edina, 2 at Southwest, 2 freshmen college Age of Children 18, 18, 17, 16, 15 Address 5712 Creek Valley Road City Edina State MN Zip 55439 Email dhenry.mn @comcast.net First Name Michele Last Name LeFebvre Spouse First Name Tony Spouse Last Name LeFebvre Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 95 42 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 2 Age of Children 13,11,4 Address 6020 Arbour Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 9 of 11 Email Mtlefebvre@comcast.net First Name Xuemin Last Name Yang Spouse First Name Xinying Spouse Last Name Yu Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 36 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 96 1 Age of Children 6 Address 5708 Benton Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email xueminyang07 @yahoo.com Spouse's Email yu_xinying @yahoo.com First Name Kevin Last Name Bohrer Spouse First Name Kristina Spouse Last Name Bohrer Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 41 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 97 2 Age of Children 9,7 Address 5605 Dale Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email kbohrer @shawlundquist.com Spouse's Email ktasbohrer @yahoo.com First Name Bill Last Name 98 Cosgrove Spouse First Name Peggu Spouse Last Name Cosgrove http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 10 of 11 Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 70 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 0 Address 6104 Tracy Avenue S City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email bill.cosgrove @hdsu.edu Spouse's Email bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu First Name Scott Last Name Haarstad Spouse First Name Carol Spouse Last Name Haarstad Taxpayers/ Voters in Household ( #) 2 Average age of adults 52 99 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 17,21 Address 6113 Tracy Ave City Edina State MN Zip 55436 Email scott.haarstad@gmail.com First Name Jenny Last Name Covington Spouse First Name Brian Spouse Last Name Craggs Taxpayers /Voters in Household ( #) 2 100 Average age of adults 34 Children in Edina Schools ( #) 1 Age of Children 11 Address 6229 Crescent Drive City Edina State MN http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print ail= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! :... Page 11 of l 1 Zip 55436 Email cov1000 @gmal1.com Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help ! Zoomerang Forums @ 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / ReportT rintOpenEndedResponsesPage.aspx ?print all= 6/24/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 2 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Z o o m P is ng- Su rvey! Results Overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:17 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 14. Please express any other thoughts or concerns you may have: # Response I am most concerned about the zoning change. This area is zoned residential and should remain residential. From personal experience, I have seen what happens in s community that allowed this to happen. I purchased a townhome Eagan a year ago that my daughter lives in to be close to the college she attends. Eagan has allowed within a three block radius, town homes, apartment buildings (one is for seniors only), single family homes, and businesses. It is not an ideal area to live in so therefore the townhome was cheap, 1 the taxes are cheap, and there are lot of families. ( many have lost or are losing there homes because of foreclosers). The traffic is terrible and roads have a 45 mile per hour speed limit. Is this the future for this area of Edina? The increased traffic to a large apartment building will make this area of Edina less attractive. Homes will lose value, taxes will go down, lower income families will move in as current home owners move to more desirable communities that may not be in Edina. I do not want to see this happen. I have lived her for most of my 61 years. I plan on remaining in my home as long as I am able. I enjoy may yard, Bredesen park, and the quiet community. As a former Countryside neigborhood resident and a continuing Edina resident, I am very opposed to this development. It will destroy the character of the entire area of Edina along Highway 62 between Valley View Road and Highway 169. This area currently feels park -like with protected single family residential dwellings. 2 This proposed massive structure will be incredibly intrusive to the area. If the project is allowed to move forward, I believe many of us will be ashamed that our fine city would permit such a radical violation of the community. Furthermore, the development process for this project has been exclusive and contrary to good government and community relations. 3 I am also concerned with the tax increment financing that is proposed to be used for funding. 4 On top of scope and scale, I'm extemely concerned about traffic and safety issues that this development will create. 5 Just vote for people who want Edina to remain as it is. Change is not always better..... 6 I'm also very concerned on the Very large traffic increase on Tracy Avenue. 7 the elected representatives of the city of edina have ignored the interests of the voters in the countryside area this is exactly why people think government is worthless. And these people all seem to work in real estate. i3 Isn't there a conflict of interest somewhere? Just an FYI based on some information I received, there are some of the yard signs being removed /stolen 9 from some supporters yards. We have had one that has gone missing, and I know of 2 in the Sunnyside neighborhood that were removed /stolen a few days ago. 10 ........... .........................thanks for all the hard work 11 We are totally disgusted with Hovland's attitude and the Council majority trying to slip this miserable plan by the residents of Edina. 12 We chose to settle in a residential neighborhood and don't want to have to move to a different location and /or different municipality that does not capriciously change the zoning of a residential neighborhood. 13 I live a block off of Tracy Ave and am very concerned about traffic since my kids will be crossing Tracy to go to school someday soon. I am also concerned this project will fail and turn into HUD housing. 14 I do not live in the Countryside neighborhood, but am extremely concerned about the precedent this is setting in Edina. http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ail = 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! 0... Page 2 of 2 Traffic! While it is being built and after it has been completed with 139 new households. Each one of those 15 households will have doctor & dental appointments, grocery, pharmacy, haircare and many other needs that will affect traffic in the area. I believe that-the two primary reasons that the City officials are attempting to ramrod this insanely massive and inappropriate project through the approval process are; 1) Colonial Church is going broke and they needed to devise a scheme to bring a monthly flow of money to the church to replace the missing donations 16 caused by the mass exodos of church members. 2) The City is short on funds and this project could bring in substantial tax revenue on the backs of the neighborhood residents who adamently oppose this unacceptable project. City official have entered into an adversarial relationship with City residents and that is disgusting. Our rights and opinions must be respected! I wish the Wayzata City Council could step in and protect my neighborhood. They had the backbone to say 17 "no" to a church to be built in a residential neighborhood. 18 Why are public funds being used for the financial benefit of a private religious institution? I am very concerned that, if approved, this would set a bad precedent of "spot zoning" for all the R -1 zoned 19 areas of the City. Also, FYI, our MAILING address is: Ray & Lois Voss 5021 Vernon Ave. So. #312 Edina, MN 55436 20 Help us understand just who the city council and staff are working for in even allowing this manipulation of our zoning, planning, and protections We are extremely concerned about the addition traffic especially construction traffic that a project like this 21 would cause. Trucks often cut through Vernon/Tracy Avenue from highway 100. The additional noise and air pollution this project would create need to be addressed. Please have trucks banned from cutting through the neighborhood; use Crosstown. 22 A letter has been sent to the Planning Commission and City Council by both my husband and myself. 23 I have written letters to be sent to all on the list 24 The amount of traffic on Tracy Avenue will increase exponentially because there are no gas stations / grocery stores / restaurants closer than 50th and Vernon. 25 Impacts on envi ron ment,traffic, safety, noise pollution,city infrastructu re, neighborhood ambience. TOO LARGE a complex is forbidding INSIDE as well as OUTSIDE. Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums © 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 2 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & � z o o m e ra n g' Survey! Results Overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:12 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 3. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group opposes the final rezoning and development plans for this project as submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals will irrevocably alter the character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot, for - profit apartment complex being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale commercial activity. The resulting commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. -It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building - i.e., 139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and six hundred feet (two football fields) in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The only buildings of similar mass and scope are Valley View Middle School, and the apartment building would be three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and. aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one point we want to make very clear: the Countryside Neighborhood Group is not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In fact, we believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Our main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. The Church and Developer has stated it cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically viable. The residents strongly reject this conclusion based on existing projects built, or soon to be built, by Shelter Corporation. We feel that a smaller, project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation enter into continued dialogue with the neighborhood as co- stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that respects the needs of the Residential Countryside Neighborhood. # Response I don't mind a smaller assisted living facility as the group is recommending, but I am still concerned about the precedent being set if it is a for - profit enterprise. It should be non - profit or not - for - profit, especially if 1 associated with the church. Traffic is a second concern - getting off of 62 onto Tracy is already hard enough. And many students take this route to and from middle and high school. I don't believe I want to see traffic lights at the intersection, but some improved bike /pedestrian crossing would be good. 2 the two opposing groups need an arbitrater to aid the negotiation 3 This whol thing is much too large for this perfect neighborhooe. I have been here or 53 yeaars..Do not ruin it! !! http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 2 of 2 4 This project is completely out of character for this area. It is not harmonious with Nine Mile Village and it would set an extremely harmful precedent. I am particularly concerned about the traffic impact. The exits from route 62 onto Tracy Ave. are currently 5 dangerous and often backed up. I am skeptical of the traffic study done. The original draft failed to include the impact of traffic from the high school; the revised version indicated that the high school had no impact, which is absurd to anyone who has observed Tracy Av. traffic between 3 and 5 on weekdays. 6 And the city of Edina needs to allow us to VOTE on rezoning and NOT take it upon themselves to assume what is right for me /my neighborhood 7 The scope of the proposed development is out of character with the rest of the neighborhood. 13 Recommend that the city not permit the zoning change at all for this purpose and act within its charter to protect the citizens it represents rather than outside special interests. 9 A smaller project would be less susceptible to vacancies, less traffic and less stress on the area's environment and infrasructure 10 Set a precedent for working together for an intergenerational NEIGHBORHOOD of appropriate size.shape for benefit of all. The project belongs on York Avenue or France Avenue which have already been ruined by overdevelopment it of what were once true neighborhoods. My children went to school, played sports and biked with friends in the Countryside neighborhood. Don't spoil the neighborhood. 12 We Cannot stand Edina's city planners who are trying to "URBANIZE" our city! We demand that you retain our "SUB" -urban neighborhoods! We don't need any more High Density developments spoiling our lives! 13 We don't need another retirement living quarters in Edina ... there are many that are not currently full occupancy We are asking the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Edina to deny the request for 14 rezoning of the property for the 139 unit apartment project. The Countryside neighbors should not be forced to deal only with Shelter Corporation and the business interests of Colonial Church. Edina city officials should be respecting, valuing and representing our concerns. I WOULD LIKE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL TO REIECT THE APPLICATION AS 15 PRESENTED AND WORK WITH THE RESIDENTS, SHELTER CORP. AND COLONIAL CHURCH TO DESIGN A SENIOR LIVING COMPLEX THAT FITS THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MAYOR CONSISTENTLY SAYS HE WANTS TO BE FAIR AND THE ABOVE REQUEST HELPS HIM MEET THIS GOAL. Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums O 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report/ PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_ all= 6/23/2010 Zoomerang I Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! : 0... Page 1 of 1 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Z o o m +e ra n g- Survey! Results overview Date: 6/23/2010 9:14 PM PST Responses: Completes Filter: No filter applied 5. By completing and submitting this electronic petition and survey, I want my submission to act as my electronic signature. I agree my feedback may be submitted to the City of Edina, so that City Leadership will understand the importance of my concerns on this important topic. # Response 1 Again, I expect the city to act in the interests of residents and protect neighborhoods from this kind of sneaky exploitation. As a member of Colonial Church I voted against the sale of the land, as did the architect of the church and many other members. When the vote passed, we were presented with three options. I voted for what I 2 thought would be a facility that looked exactly like the church campus in design. Nothing was presented at the time of the second vote to suggest the size and scope of this project. It is the design and scope that are so objectionable to this area. 3 I want my feedback submitted to the City of Edina, and to express my profound disappointment in the manner that the city has dealt with this "project." I am not fully opposed to the idea of a senior housing unit. I am opposed to the size and scale at what they want to build. I have also heard rumblings that it would turn into section 8 housing. If this is the case, the 4 entire area's property values would be greatly effected. The surrent road system is in need of repair and would cost the city and tax payers more money to upgrade this for the increase traffic as well. As I see this, it is a lose lose for the residents of Countryside Nieghborhood. 5 I WOULD LIKE THE CITY COUNCIL TO EXPLAIN WHATERVER DECISION THEY COME UP WITH. I WOULD LIKE THEM TO STATE FACTS NOT OPINIONS. Products & Services I About Us I Support/Help I Zoomerang Forums n 2010 Copyright MarketTools Inc. All Rights Reserved. I Privacy Policy I Terms Of Use http: // app. zoomerang. com / Report /PrintOpenEndedResponsesPage .aspx ?print_all = 6/23/2010 Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's Electronic Petition & Survey! Response Status: Completes Filter: No filter applied Jun 23, 2010 6:59 PM PST Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group Concerns Please have every adult in your household that opposes this project fill out this electronic survey and petition. Each person should use their own email, but if you share an email address, please Indicate It where asked. Please attend Public Meetings If you agree with the following: 1. Show support for another option than what the Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation's May 28, 2010 Revised Plans propose; one that Is complementary to the character and symmetry of the Edina Countryside residential neighborhood. 2. Express your concerns regarding the zoning precedent that is being created here that may Impact all residents of Greater Edina. 3. Share your concerns of the process used to bypass Edina's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning laws, by creating a Subdivision and giving preliminarily approval to a for - profit Church /Developer Application in a very short time frame (45 days) without adequate time for neighborhood input. 1. Edina Household Information (we need you to fill out all the Information that is applicable) 116 Responses 2. 1 agree to have Dan Rasmus, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's attorney be my spokesperson at the public meetings. I agree and support the arguments he raises (In the following section): 114 99% Yes 1 1 % No 115 100% Total 3. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group opposes the final rezoning and development plans for this project as submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans Is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of Individuals will irrevocably alter the character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot, for -profit apartment complex being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale commercial activity. The resulting commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope ai 112 100% Yes 0 0% No 112 100% TM.1 Page 1 of 3 S. By completing and submitting this electronic petition and survey, I want my submission to act as my electronic signature. I agree my feedback may be submitted to the City of Edina, so that City Leadership will understand the Importance of my concerns on this , Important topic. Yes 115 100% No 0 0% Total 115 100% 6. Please Indicate what you support. You may select multiple items. develop their property within the zoning ordinances. Please keep in mind Colonial Church has the common law right to Keep as residential, build single family homes and town homes 73 63% Request a small area plan - we all need to step back to determine options 63 54% 2 story, 50 -75 units, complementary in character & symmetry 66 57% 2 story, 100 units, complementary in character & symmetry 8 7% 3 story, 44 feet high, 139 units, 600 feet long 0 0% 4 story, 67 feet high, 150 units, 600 feet long (original proposed building) 0 0% Other please soecifv: 9 8% 10. Do you consider It to be an Issue that an exception to the City of Edina's recently approved Comprehensive Plan be granted to allow for a commercial, for - profit project to be built in a residential area that was never earmarked for such change? Not at all important 0 0% Not very important 1 1 % Moderately important 1 1 % Very important 11 10% Extremely important 100 88% Total _ 113 100% 11. Do you consider it to be an issue that the Planning Commission and City Council provided approval in just 45 days for a $44 million, upscale, apartment complex, when the largest stakeholders (2,000 homes within a mile of the proposed site representing approximately $750 million in residential property value) were not part of the process, while the Church, Developer, and City had been working together on this project for six months or longer? http: / /cltyofedina.com /Departments /CompPlan.htm Not at all important 0 0% Not very important 0 0% Moderately important 1 1% Very important 13 11% Extremely important 100 B8% Total 114 100% 12. Do you continue to consider the revised proposed upscale senior apartment to be an Issue even if it is reduced to three stories, 44 feet high (a two story home Is typically 25 feet tall), 139 units; but retains most of its mass, and the length of two football fields (600 feet), In a quiet residential neighborhood? Not at all important 0 0% Not very important 0 0% Moderately important 2 2% Very important 16 1010 Extremely important 95 830% Total 115 100% Page 2 of 3 13. Are you concerned about the proposed zoning change, and the city wide implications this zoning precedent may have on greater Edina (i.e. giving non - profit entities a zoning variance for a commercial, for - profit, high-density subdivision variance In a residential neighborhood? 0 0% No concern 0 0% Low 1 1% Moderate 8 7% High o o 116 / Very high concern 116 100% � 14. Please express any other thoughts or concerns you may have: 40 Thank you for participating in this survey. Page 3 of 3 RECEIVED JUN 2 5 1010 Susan Howl From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto:BarbaraHoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:18 AM To: Gordon Hughes Cc: christine. hen ninger @genmills.com; Cary Teague; Lynette Biunno; jhooganakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: RE: The Waters - Posting of Addl Two Signs on June 15, 2010, Two Weeks Before Planning Commission, Who Made the Decision, for what purpose, and why now? Please cc the Mayor, City Council, Planning Commissioners Thank you Gordon. I understand your responses, however, respectfully I am sure you can appreciate, these sign ordinances, the interpretation of them, and their implementation doesn't make sense. This does not pass the reasonableness test, and fit with the purpose and spirit of why they were created to begin with;one that does not represent all residents fairly. I understand the City is working with outdated and inadequate codes and are in the process of improving them. I hope the updated codes will create a code that everyone can rely on it in a more reasonable and fair manner,again one that is representative of residents, city, developers, etc. I hope that any other city policies, processes, and culture changes can be made where needed as well to support a more productive and efficient process. I would ask the city to consider looking at the advantages and disadvantages of moving more toward a charter city, or to become one, vs. the statutory city that it is today if this will bring about a more fair playing field. This is all a tremendously time consuming effort, and unnecessary as there are better ways. This is not a good use of city staff time and tax payers dollars, as well as residents and developers,time and money too. Thank you again, Gordon for taking your time to give us a response and direction. I thank you and the City Staff and Leadership for all you do. I think if you make these changes, your residents will love their city even more. If there is anything that you recommend we can be a part of to bring about more up to date best practices, and constructive change that is more representative of all stakeholders please let us know how we may participate Respectfully yours, Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place From: Gordon Hughes [mailto:GHughes @ ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 1:46 PM To: barbarahoganson @comcast.net Cc: christine .henninger @genmills.com; Cary Teague Subject: RE: The Waters - Posting of Addl Two Signs on June 15, 2010, Two Weeks Before Planning Commission, Who Made the Decision, for what purpose, and why now? Thank you for last week's e-mail concerning the posting of additional signs in the vicinity of the Waters project. You asked "who made the decision, for what purpose, and why now ?" Who made the decision? I understand that the additional signs were posted voluntarily by the applicant at the suggestion of the City's Planning Department. For what purpose? As mentioned in my March 22 e-mail, rezonings of this-type are a two step process - preliminary and final. If preliminary approval is granted, the proponent is eligible to submit an application for final development plan approval. Such an application was received at the end of May for consideration at the June 30 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Department suggested to the applicant that additional signage, following submission of the final application, would be desirable, although not required, in light of criticism that the original signage did not meet the spirit of the ordinance. Why Now? I cannot speak to the applicant's apparent refusal to install additional signs during the course of neighborhood discussions. As noted above, the Planning Department's reasoning was that additional signs would be desirable once an application was made for final consideration. The applicant agreed. RECEIVED June 22, 2010 JUN 2 4 zoo James B. Hovland, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: My wife Dianne and I were long time residents of Edina until 1999, when we moved from our house on Richwood Drive, to a townhome in Bloomington. I was born in Edina and graduated from Edina High School in 1958. We raised our family there and are long time members of Colonial Church of Edina. We have watched with great interest the proposed development of the "Waters Senior Living Center" on the property of Colonial Church of Edina. Our hope is that the Edina Planning Commission and the City council will approve the construction of this project. I remember when Colonial purchased the site for the present buildings, and the talk of having the extra land for an eventual seminary, or senior care center. I was on a committee about fifteen years ago which considered using the land as the location for N.C. Little Hospice. The Waters Senior Living Center will make great use of this valuable resource. Dianne and I would love to have the option of coming back to Edina in the future as residents of the Waters. It would be the best of both worlds — close to the church we love, and a living again in the wonderful city of Edina. Sincerely o , David D. Getsch 10202 Berkshire Road Bloomington, MN 55437 (952) 897 -3863 RECEIVED JUN 2 41010 Susan Howl Subject: Oppose the existing Waters Development I am writing to voice my opinion regarding the proposed waters development. In the interest of space and your time I have not included the letter from Dan Rasmus, Attorney At Law that was sent to you on 5/28 but I agree with all of it and oppose the development as it is planned. The paragraph of that letter that begins with "The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever..." is especially important. The city is concerned that families are not moving into Edina because the older people are not moving out. One big reason that families with small children are not moving into Edina is because of the cost of housing. OUR Countryside neighborhood is one of the few neighborhoods that families CAN afford. If this large facility is built as planned, common sense tells us all that the traffic will increase around the neighborhood. Families DO NOT want to move into areas that have a lot of traffic. (I know there have been traffic studies done but one needs to think about this realistically and with common sense. There will be much more traffic). I love our city. I know that budgets are tight all over and this would be good revenue for our city. (This would be a windfall for Colonial). Please consider a smaller development in that area. You would all get my votes in the next election. Thank you. Please pass on my email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Jeanne St. Pierre 6i-.696.6319 z000 Nicollet TPS -298o Mpls, MN 55403 jean ne.stpierre(a)taraet.com Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Senior Housing RECEIVED JUN 2 4 1010 From: Randy Johnson [ma I Ito: rmjohnson @klodt.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 11:43 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Proposed Senior Housing It looks like it is on the freeway with buffer, 1 assume since it is for profit good tax revenue. Since it is four stories 1 would also assume it is 48' high or less (looks like a low pitch roof, maybe go to flat roof to keep height down). I see it as good for Edina maybe I will live there some day. Qrt Editm ✓9&6kient udt&in.12 6&cfm o f pwpomed pwod. James B. Hovland RECEIVED Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. JUN Z 4 X010 Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hovland We are writing to inform you of our support of the proposed Waters Senior Living Center that is to be built by the Edina fire station and Colonial Church. As you know, Edina has a large percentage of residents who are over 65 and will be in need of this type of housing. Although we live in Minneapolis at present, our church is Colonial and the majority of our shopping is done in Edina. Consequently, we are looking forward to living there when the building is completed. The building's height seems to be a point of contention with the neighbors and the developers have modified that by eliminating the fourth floor. The artist's rendering presents an attractive three story building with attractive landscaping and tree plantings. We believe this development will be a financial asset to Edina and a good use of this undeveloped land as well as a benefit to many residents who will be needing this type of home in the near future. Sincerely Yours Charlie & Maxine Ernst Marco D Susan Howl Subject: Colonial / Shelter Corp Petition List RECEIVED Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. JUN 2 0010 Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague Jackie Hoogenakker Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Hello City Leaders of Edina and Ms. Hoogenakker, We want the City of Edina Leadership to have a listing of 217 Edina Residents (attached as a separate PDF) who have signed a petition officially marking their opposition to the initial Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation Living Waters Plans, and the current Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 submitted to the City of Edina by the Church and Developer. For the record, there were 30 duplicates on the attachment that were flagged and not counted. The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group has worked in good faith with the Developer and Church and unfortunately we have not been able to come up with an acceptable agreement. We ask respectfully for you to reject the plans being presented at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission and July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting, and demand the Church and Developer come up with plans that are more complementary to the symmetry and character of the neighborhood; plans that are more in line in size and scope of the other one and two story buildings in this solely residential area. If you have questions please allow us the opportunity to respond and thank you for the time and consideration. Regards, Kevin McCoy 5809 Jeff Place Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT - March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail f� DY1 ke S' �D�3�� nLtoD CVM Yewuz ' p &,& sam - - �`7a �1; 1�C1 a��48o '773 _S!�4 Y l'uz oz) q11--111 _�Rvrrna:5 Y, 1, -0, 0 E - • �r �w @A( 4( bu i 4, OZ PETITION REOUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION! COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print_ Name 1 / Jv�JhSo Sign Name Address/Phone Number a i'7-5130 % - �r E -Mail 6cZ -tYand @Ca4- lei'` o��(v e6-c�rt S /-1 YJUraSCn,)i,tsoi.0 ' r7ru 6Zo� cP�si LA7-1'e P9L-*k&5c"c(-.0R, . 0Y5 ivaO'!'ZO- TlehlaeC ���'lN� '�@ •���. jcliy. Ct PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION - We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Pri Name 4 Sign ame S �1 Q A Address/Phone Number E- ail 1 61 � 13 z (L-.,/- u % .-'_YKA Jr, Ur . , V tte 4zk Jr ) ,4 t�__ �� �� -�<s� cU� Cyr , c S � • �— J PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's. Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. J Print Name 4;ft0_\[ I 611 K� F, VC IUSO N �A,�Lll T �k r d�ii N k7hs a-) G Sign Name �L � 1. ✓�L �' Address/Phone Number 9sz. 941, -079 8 I,� y ad V.' , i (" 36 4 �ML - ;6,4 Tr&cam Ay E -Mail � s...tr u► d , cn�r� M KaAv h44,1 0 PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name S N i ame e SWARM, =lei v r rl .� �/ 5,�, Y Address/Phone Number S2-0 -1 L DGA toy Aii v-e,, m X . (e el -.0(-e -e -� �10L)4 1&24 E -Mail } PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2.. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be Print Name Lim Lrlm � (ec�� M&_J1_ LIe 6e Al� 5 e,ljU,a4,L- pr),; N f j (IBS reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. , WW -05$CF efMCA,�4- UM b� 13 'rrr� e - Ut-o, 55f.°1 da(1,a ��.-r r. 00 J 7 0 !' - Ien lias °oa f : 5hq�ca -1�. Asaa - ' /a X Z-14 E' r0m n 006 {.lay 91 S.Z CC• T5" • IVF7` l ,ko, 04 f��, ��`�fi� al�eU , WW -05$CF efMCA,�4- UM b� 13 'rrr� e - Ut-o, 55f.°1 da(1,a ��.-r r. 00 J 7 0 !' - Ien lias °oa f : 5hq�ca -1�. Asaa - ' /a X Z-14 E' r0m n 006 {.lay 91 S.Z CC• T5" • IVF7` PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDNISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name , , Address/Phone Number 762R GJ YcZ E -Mail 4 okc6 -y' ne.1101- `y PETITION RE VESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit,the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail K 1 IK I" ` e 55 A1LXOUt-A-UT-- . J L M.COat 59 o fi P*v- ,14- AVM 5 &d'U C9r4v-t S, IN 9A,fc layo& czwwt-Aefi 5� O 1 b V2 CAYXbbMu w� /t A 0 4v t:.. r PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name cis ,%,L�-f oL%tj _N y UI el Address/Phone Number E -Mail s �.��� Gw�uld 009 .� y�.vioo 5 9M ISCE&Z aO a4.COkn d- ti0f �-ac 4 9651_q _o6� �wc�n,vt -�_ vo. cod CkVCK //ova c� �b12 X -���5�� �d � 0 -0 r T� 1 PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Address/Phone Number E -Mail / J iu ! e .err uM z4vin PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to-Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name J S �7�f r C(V-64n 1-6 oa �lirJ Sign Name Address/Phone Number r'I vG Gc, i,, (,C/t 2v 06 �p E-Mail vC, Z 14 t 1,x " fV\m DAB 1, c-- .. __w__ �o 1�CL aA �v PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina.Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Nam Address/Phone Number E -Mail 5va 2� �lyyo� 0 (j PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS I %, LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 201.0 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will periodically exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name "'Ply a W .I/ D7 1WXAW_ MAN , t,p z - I _ c. e. s S-111- LO Address/Phone Number E -Mail 1 1 Z-v ' e_q ✓Ac.c car J� 7a94-mg d wm '-714i ►'�1i�1w�g' ���� - -1 LF PETITION RE UESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT - March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Si Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail p2� „tea!/. LI�GIi�i�i �`1D �1(�/�G��7G�.S�,/OPig: 1 ' � �_ 1 � .��. • • � � _ a± iii RL' :. �.���� I /4"le �,75- 7- 9u3p- '9 7af 1, av;�-(Av hAs- MIC.eorn L dc ✓r7D i� r�L,� /�� 'r.� �i•-� sQ r� -+�. �,� PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT - March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name PAu�r�� 6�4696�s y.. J.AA, &1e+_% m M-I' MA K"AMM lip... Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail 1, tlAlf 14-rl 0"I G� M 6Yao l jt,,,Y- U, QS'z-`�z`1`itlzb 6 , o n �t-6o �- �� qs a -g Z�- 9�i r .�6r6�c.eo�►� �.k.,, 5812 W CoIS�Sd- ,�ev�-g5�s717 -y�s9 ����-y�.��. `@5'- PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly - impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will periodically exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address/Phone Number m t} i; 7, ° 6 6v ay C �. ►Jed /i L11 E -Mail PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SEl COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name �Mwdffl MIFF, John H- avrle.r� Av�ne Mc�Eoti. Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail 0 SP�29 T'�zo� 92� .l ��3 i12rAe'1 �,,,,•,�s�,i' ���� �e�F P�G�C� �1256'�l�K o O�l�v�e v►�oC�7�� CAw.ch�k 0- PETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SEr COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 M I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters /Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign ;Tamg /j 1 Address/Phone Number E -Mail =11 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree- filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email 3. F j Dt�iv� 0201 1 LLS t�� �'o 5orI S 2 ,q&L 4 i/h O ,( c% < < 5. 6. v 7., s. 9, C&Wasi-, # e_� 31/3? 6 a' 4q Ci'tl�c. 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name 1. 2. �,f,4 Naar Address Email Ceohaar5hteI,@ cork, FJ 10. J ov 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000'feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree -filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email / // ' /�r.h•! o (�� � w. I r 2. 3. VPO1 ��P�71 �'t4�i Pu,r D►'t�i_s yPrNoo. cU1rn EC E0, �4 CL Jvj C S7 ti� 4. /i��r,A /L /fJJc S1 11GC -Cr=�'GyiE rug � cY' / //ail 5. k ,, v� rte, 6. (, DUB �Qi cornGaS nt �UvJ2 L 0��sF..,e`f 7. 8. 9 �i �av� ( I b 10. lJ:kIle- � ct�56VI �o)s'1C�6%/�1e�� C 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree -filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email ,. t f _ 1.27 Y /-Z- 'er �5 lv 5 -3 52 ;_.X- a D� IT- Lk �S d • COY,) 2C k4f I. d %p 4. 5. &kA_? . 6. 7. dAq 8. 9. 9(0- 0-". TRT.� V4p`+ - -r- V =�_� ../mil � _ L� SG 0�\k -e_ SS 43 Le dVY` Q1 y . ► �v- 5 & 8 9���� L ✓_ / i r Y 4p3ryvaiteyv,z-wri<a e7GS1YteL Iyf/ll ?�L ✓�o�yS2M!5.K.C��. -°-r Q, KL.D,,, �7 10. 3 r 9) 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name Address Email f AMP mio 7. E 10. .1 C7- 2. The proposed rezoning is NOT compatible with the Edina Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate changing the zoning in an R -1 residential area to PRD -5. 3. The size of the proposed structure is NOT compatible with the existing Countryside neighborhood. A four -story building, the length of two football fields, would dramatically change the sightlines of many Edina residents, both within 1000 feet and far beyond, and would negatively impact the existing, fundamental character of this tranquil, tree - filled Countryside neighborhood. 4. We respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council vote NO to the request for final approval of the rezoning of the Colonial Church property from R -1 to PRD -5, and vote NO to the request for construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision. 5. Alternatively, we respectfully request that the Mayor of Edina and the members of the Edina City Council require that the proposed Living Waters Senior Subdivision be limited to a 2 -story building. Name 1� 2 4.Q/ 5. 6. 1 7. 8. 9,_ 10. Address %llsi l a P ES7P I Email c Gam.. r ^�N �- � 9 ({St• s v,QNE� 1 l.u^�. IU � . -MI-19 z "t—L°'^ cam•• �I`' 4w G r 9 Name': Complete Address Email 14 Ole r �ZS z DL�.tJ �,u�s2 ®�o� . r va-, 3�� —� 2. J OAxJC- C) 60RAS 5832 PQA1C � Cowl c P 7 �I ? 9. &I s 37 f la ct 5837 'Plat, LPszv%e d- I %.Coyv%t..st'•Iac r ct3j %6se ,n3po ceimGao. n8t q N jol, 66.63 @ c r,,cas+, nart ,1 low du- '61- t ylVSaN - 12. �4 0&41 6 Ald 13. 6 23 z X041 v le Lev 14. 15/ 16 C- 17, 18 P;v�r1A,1 -� 5593b 1 h h /7j&/7 Pza oX to, 45Wce,,� /ja! c jgo ss'i3b s- z,%oe 0- PETITION OPPOSING LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT If the "Edina Planning Commission and City Council give final approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football fields wide to be located near the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Highway 62 (behind the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of central Edina will be changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy Avenue and the surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to-this project and request that the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. -Name c i 1. tnlr Cis 2. C / /e/+ -]-an-r 5 d� Address Ema 5Eo`t -r?,ACY AVE. W-PA Kc C,�AVE�t�w AOL.CaA4 j7r eod1e.S(c•) w I rja:r..��i;� ccz MC a('. �o gA5-7 fiic�wxd Jr, I'Gon�e� ��nGR,it. �1Z7` -V 11. C" eVa,,A 3$0q -Pa4 five -- � a. '71 U fl: PETITION OPPOSING LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT If the Edina Planning Commission and City Council give final approval to the LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISON /COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT, a 150 -unit nursing home that is four stories tall and two football fields wide to be located near the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Highway 62 (behind the fire station and near Colonial Church), the character of central Edina will be changed and the scope and volume of traffic congestion on Tracy Avenue and the surrounding area will increase. I am thus opposed to this project and request that the Edina Planning Commission and City Council reject it. Name Address Email 00 Is 16. Nark lAora,mov4X bR d e B roa L )f ,ve- 57i43�' 17. Ud i �n,vim SS43 ° vj; �vE rrL, �- 18. u I l `2a rt .f sy 19. 300 -) f i tub SIC'. C(Q kA45/ 4W YL 20. ' 7f� S__5 21. M 0-y 11 e. Sid l kDeh e nS r Yen rncry���i �d'�7"jrn�� 22. 5aAP . AJ 24. S'3 �PcNSvv-c -fir, L•J �ft-'s cl%00 (H•u -c �� Gtr i 25.AM PETITION.doc https: // mail. googl e. com/ maiy7 ui= 2 &i1�- 69e354lfB5&view= att&th =... !Z9 v P_ ETITION REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS TO LIVING WATERS SENIOR SUBDIVISION/ COLONIAL CHURCH PROJECT — March 10, 2010 I agree with the Petition Concerns noted below, and am opposed to the construction of the Living Waters Senior Subdivision as it is currently proposed. I request that the Mayor of Edina, the Edina City Council, and the Edina Planning Commission address the concerns noted below. PETITION — We, residents of Edina directly impacted by the Living Waters/Colonial Church Project, respectfully submit the following concerns: 1. The proposed design for the Living Waters project is not compatible with the surrounding buildings and sightlines. A revised design should be consistent in height, length, and design with the Edina fire station, Colonial Church, Nine -Mile Village and the Jehovah's Witness Worship Center, with surrounding landscaping also consistent with the existing surroundings. 2. Proof of Parking should be required, as it appears likely that the parking demands of Colonial Church, in addition to Living Waters, Countryside Park and Bredesen Park will exceed the planned parking supply. 3. The proposed Living Waters project must integrate appropriately with the Countryside Park Redesign. 4. Increased traffic activity needs to be further reviewed to consider all impacts of the Living Waters project. Print Name Sign Name Address/Phone Number E -Mail °1 sa- 9as -�.z io A qsa -gas -ya-io 1 of2 3/21/2010 1:07 PM June 21, 2010 James Hovland, Mayor RECEIVED Edina City Hall JUN i 3 210 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing in support of "The Waters" Senior Living Center, proposed to be built on property of Colonial Church next to the Crosstown Highway. I have studied the drawings and proposals for this facility and believe it will be an asset to the City of Edina and to many current and future residents of this city. As a lifelong Edina resident I believe this project to be completely in keeping with the quality and beauty of homes in Edina as well as offering a needed service to our aging population. My Mother lives in a senior complex in another city. The designs and amenities of The Waters are exactly what she was looking for. This facility should be a highly sought after address for future Edina Senior Citizens. I understand that neighbors and others have voiced concerns about this project's size and possible changes in traffic in the area. Knowing this the developers have met with and listened to these concerns and made changes in the designs to alleviate these concerns. Their responsiveness and desire to work with the neighborhood shows that The Waters will be a good neighbor in our community. The location is perfect for a facility of this type as the planning commission recognized when they gave their preliminary approval. The Crosstown offers easy access without traffic in the neighborhood. The Fire Station and park are a buffer, removing the project to a distance more than double City of Edina requirements from nearby homes. The plans include ample parking, additional quality trees on the property and large setbacks. The Waters should be a beautiful asset to the Countryside Neighborhood. I urge you, and the City Council to approve this project in keeping with quality development in our ci� and in response to current and future needs of our residents. Sincerely, Beth Henrich 4113 W. 45th St. Edina, MN 55424 City Of Edina RECEIVED 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 -1394 JUN 2 3 2010 RE: Resolution No. 2007.63 PLEASE DO NOT RESCIND THE AMENDMENT.... THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL AREA AND WE DO NOT NEED OR WANT AMPLIFICATION. THIS WOULD SPOIL THE PARK AND NEIGHBORHOOD AREA. VOTE NO, PLEASE. Bess Marmas June 20, 2010 RECEIVED Mayor James B. Hovland, Edina JUN 2 31010 Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50TH ST. EDINA, MN 55424. Dear Mayor Hovland: I'm writing this letter in support of the proposed Waters Senior Living center. In light of thinking about this matter, I spent some time today and visited two nearby facilities of similar intent, which are .4 and .6 miles from my house. They are the Sunrise facility(18605 Old Excelsior Blvd. Minnetonka) and the Frazer Excelsior Courts (in Minnetonka). Here is a photo of the Sunrise Facility: I've put two photos together to illustrate that there are residences right across the street. I found some documentation from the Minnetonka City Council that gives some background on their deliberations. (http://www.eminnetonka.com/news events /projects /planning /18605 old excelsior /cc staff report 010504.pdf) Aside from some requests with regard to landscaping, there seemed to be no major objections to this facility from the "neighbors" when it was put in. Interestingly enough, when you go across Highway 7 and look north you see this: That is to note that there is no landscaping in front of the Sunrise facility and the neighbors across the / street have an unobstructed view ". As I was taking these photos I was able to talk to 2 neighbors and 1 asked them if they felt the "Sunrise" facility detracted from their value. They both said no, that it was so well built and gracious looking it ADDED to their value. I should also note that because of access to a Target store and my personal health commitment I oft times bike or walk the 1 Yz miles from my house to the Target. Right along the primary access road to the Sunrise facility. I have noticed NO significant increase in traffic along that road, which is still very pedestrian /biker friendly. A little further down the road and on the south side of highway 7 is the Fraser Excelsior Courts, for developmentally disabled individuals. E Granted, it is 2 story ... but there are at least 5 houses across from it with a clear view. There was NO protest on it's development when it was put in 10 years ago. (Interestingly it technically is a "Section 8" housing, which has an inordinately bad "rap" because of some particular troublesome projects across the country.) Again, where Excelsior Blvd. goes in front of this is my weekend "long" bike trek route, which I have been doing for over 15 years. I've never had trouble with traffic from this facility. (The Minnetonka High School, 3 blocks west of this facility, however, does cause a problem at times!) I personally, at age 57, am getting to the point where I could see ending up in an assisted living facility such as the Water's Senior Living center. I have no designs upon the Waters, but I would be proud to help leave it as a legacy no matter where 1 end up. In light of my experience, in the Minnetonka /Shorewood area (resident for 23 years) frankly I'm "dumbfounded" by the objections given to the Water's project by the "residents ". I'm having a hard time following the logic of their objections. I would hope that you as the Mayor and the Council may execute some considered judgment on this and perhaps come to a different conclusion than some people have come too... on' perhaps "shaky" logical grounds. You can add my voice in support, although I'm fully aware I only have an Aunt, Uncle, Cousin (wife and 3 children) who live in Edina ... and have no objections...so I would say I have a "minor" Edina connection, aside from my involvement with Colonial Church. Yours, Mark Hugo ►4 ca t 3-- U 1 C C:5- RECEIVED JUN 2 3 2010 y g0 � v�w Ssy� -y .C:R- 7D qe� eS�Q RECE6 V= "'D JUN 13 2010 Mayor James B. Hovland Edina City Offices 4801 W. 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, My wife and I are writing you on behalf of The Waters Senior Living Center proposal which is currently before you. We have already submitted our names as potential residents of this facility. As members of Colonial Church of Edina for 30 years, we are excited about the possibility of living in close proximity to our church. The "Waters" would provide us with the opportunity to age in place. A survey shows that more than 10,000 Edina residents are over 65 years of age. There is obviously a need for more facilities of this kind which will provide much needed housing housing to the growing number of senior citizens. We've attended meetings at Colonial attended by �nmadbdressed, and we know that adjustments g their concerns. We believe that these concerns have been made in the building plans to mitigate those concerns. Any further downsizing of the proposed structure would jeopardize the viability of the project in every way. We strongly encourage you to approve The Waters Senior Living Center. It is 800 feet from the closest single family homes on Olinger Blvd. It is the ideal location for this type of special use. It's proximity to, and tangential connection to the Church should foster community building and intergenerational connections and outreach. Very few senior housing facilities have this benefit. Cordially, Paul and Dr. Grace Ramseyer 952- 936 -9860 peramseyer@nwc.edu RECEIVED Susan Howl n iN T 3 1010 Members of the City Council, You have under consideration the Waters Senior Living project, to be built on land that is now owned by Colonial Church of Edina. I understand the nature of the project and am in favor of it. From the City's perspective, it would seem that a quality senior living facility is a sensible addition. Edina's demographics point to a steadily increasing supply of potential residents for the foreseeable future. Indeed, at a later date, both my wife and I will be candidates. My parents live in Friendship Village, a fine place. But, it is in Bloomington and I would prefer the option of a newer facility within Edina. This particular project is endorsed by Colonial Church, a longtime and valued institution in the community. The Church Council and numerous congregation members worked for several years to decide on an appropriate use for the land and on an appropriate development and operating partner. More recently, Colonial members have worked on the specific plans for the facility. It strikes me that Colonial's deep involvement should add credence to the assertions that the facility will provide high quality living and care arrangements for its residents. Appropriately, the approval process for such a project has involved reviews by various government entities both within and outside Edina's City Government. Also appropriately, the views of residents in the area of the project have been solicited. Material changes to the project have been made as a result. However, I understand that opposition exists. In addition to the points above, I urge the City Council to keep the following in mind as it assesses the points raised by the proponents and opponents of the Waters Senior Living project. The land is owned by Colonial and there is no law requiring that it be kept as the small parcel of woods that it is. Given that Colonial does not want to keep the land as is, something is going to be put there. And, if that something is a Colonial Church endorsed, high quality senior living facility which will benefit many current Edina residents, what could be better? Mike Bochert I am a member of Colonial Church. I am also on the Board of the Colonial Foundation which has provided some of the funds required to advance the project to its current state. Michael Bochert, CFA Investment Banking 612/889 -0638 mbochert cDcomcast.net Susan Howl Please forward to the individuals listed below. Many thanks. The Honorable Mayor James Hovland RECEIVED City Council Member Joni Bennett JUN 131010 City Council Member Mary Brindle City Council Member Scot Housh City Council Member Ann Swenson Gordon Hughes, City Manager Dear Mayor Hovland, Members of the City Council, and Mr. Hughes: I wish that zoning still operated under the application of the common law of nuisance because it best describes the way I feel about Shelter Corporation's proposed Living Waters senior apartment building : it's a nuisance, not noxious in itself, but it is an example of the right thing in the wrong place." While realizing the planning process isn't perfect -how could it be when it requires total knowledge of sociology, economics, demographics, geography, and everything else, plus perfect foresight - -I have to ask why isn't ore community input sought from the people who actually live in the neighborhood? I thought the City protected the character and symmetry of its unique neighborhoods. One important quality that attracted us to Countryside was that it is a purely residential neighborhood, one without commercial activity. If we wanted to live in neighborhood with commercial activity we would have chosen to live in a different part of Edina. If the Shelter Corporation Living Waters project goes forward as proposed it will be to the detriment of Countryside's unique character, which will in turn, be a loss for Edina. Jane Jacobs, the author of "The Death and Life of Great American Cities," expresses my fears best: "Every place becomes more like every other place, all adding up to Noplace." Please preserve the character, symmetry, and aesthetic quality of Countryside neighborhood. Please do not permit the Shelter Corporation - Living Waters project to go forward as proposed. Sincerely, Dorothy Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place 952 - 221 -1893 1 Susan Howl Please forward this email to the City Leaders listed below. Thank you! Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland RECEIVED Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle JUN 131010 Council Member Scot Housch Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Shroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Dear Planning Commissioners, Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Yesterday on my lunch break I spent an interesting half hour at the Edina Senior Center, which, I was surprised to learn, falls under the auspices of Parks and Recreation. I had a very nice conversation with Susan, the Center's only full -time employee, and two gentlemen she brought into the conversation. They asked me if I was looking for information for a parent (I was thankful they didn't ask me if the packet of information I had gathered was for myself : ) and I said yes. During our conversation, I asked them what they thought is the biggest obstacle seniors face in Edina -was it housing, medical care, shopping? What? What was their opinion? To which they replied: "Nah, there's no shortage of housing for seniors. There's condos and apartments all over the place. What we need is transportation." Me: "I have an acquaintance who lives on York Ave and she loves the bus that runs between her building and the shopping area." "Yes, that's the Beeline. Those busses only go up as far as Fairview, even though we've asked a million times for the route to come up here." "It's great for the people who live in that area, but everyone else is out of luck." "And there's only 80 parking spaces at the Center here; that's why the library lot is always so full." "Everybody drives." Transportation -not housing. Please do not permit the Shelter Corporation proposed apartment building to go forward as proposed. Sincerely, Dorothy Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Living Project Please pass this e-mail on to the city leaders listed below: Gorden Hughes, City Mgr. James Hovland, Mayor Council Members: Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Scot Housh Ann Swenson Planning Commission Members: Stephen Brown Jeff Carpenter Michael Fischer Arlene Forrest Floyd Gabriel Julie Risser Nancy Scherer Michael Schroeder Kevin Stauton Dear City Leaders: RECEIVED JUN 131010 I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed Waters development and rezoning of the Colonial Church property per the plan submitted by Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. I, like many others in surrounding area, am not opposed to a more suitably -sized project which would be more in line with residential neighborhood. The project, as proposed, is very large and is not consistent with a residential area. The zoning, if changed, would set a very poor precedent in allowing commercial, for profit projects to invade what had been exclusively residential. Other oppositional issues ( already brought up by other residents) include lack of community involvement in the rezoning process, rushed timelines in preliminary approval, traffic concerns related to a large commercial enterprise, lack of coherence with a proposed Comprehensive City Plan and the further potential impact of the Nine Mile Creek bikepath on this same area. For these and other reasons, I urge the planning commission and the city council to reject the Waters Project as proposed and consider a more suitable development that would fit into the character of the neighborhood. A much smaller senior project - possibly non- profit - would be welcomed and needed in our community. Sincerely, Ron and Barb Fraboni 5505 Grove Street Susan Howl From: Brian Barry RECEIVED— Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:57 PM JUN 2 3 2010 To: 'mailto:edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us'; ' mailto :jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina 1st Addn Dear J. Hovland, J. Bennett, M. Brindle, S. Housh, and A. Swenson and the Edina Planning Commission, This is my second message to this group regarding this topic and I found it humorous the only person that responded was the one who did in fact vote against the re- zoning. I guess when you are wrong and you cannot defend your position it is best to remain silent; maybe most of you should have practiced that when it was time to vote for the project. I am writing you again to formally inform you of my extreme dissatisfaction with you and the governing body of Edina. As a resident of Edina I am appalled that you would arbitrarily rezone land to allow a non - profit organization to build a for - profit senior center at the cost of the neighborhood. The residents of Edina do not want this structure built, as evidenced by the sizable and vocal opposition to the project. It seems the only people in favor of the project are those who stand to benefit financially from it; including the planning commission, the city council, mayor and members of Colonial Church; two thirds of whom do not even live in Edina. I am beyond irate that you have put the financial desires of of Colony Church ahead of the wants and needs of the local community. You should be ashamed. Do not allow this project to proceed. Do not build this 139 units on the once R1 land and in my neighborhood, rezone some land in your neighborhood and build it in yours if you want it that badly. Or better yet just convert all R1 land for commercial development, why this one, WHY? You are failing those you are supposed to represent. Brian P. Barry 6100 Westridge Blvd, Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl From: Marlys Husebo [mailto:mhusebo @msn.com] RECEIVED Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:55 PM JUN 2 Z 2010 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Sr. Living at Colonial Church My name is Manford (Manny) Husebo. I live at 6232 Oriole Lane in Nine Mile Village about 30 feet from Colonial Church parking lot. I have lived here for over 20 years. I attended Wooddale School for both kindergarten and grade school. I was in the first graduating class of Edina High School in 1951. As you can see, I have lived in Edina almost my entire life. I deeply oppose this rezoning to PDR -5 for several reasons: There are 17 churches in Edina; most of which have large grounds. To change this zoning would open the door for all 17 churches to build expensive nursing homes in non - commercial areas. This is the major problem. Someone could buy property anywhere in Edina and build a multi - dwelling commercial structure. In addition, the traffic problem will be immense. There would be in and out traffic day and night to the Senior Center. Tracy Avenue already has extreme traffic: Some of it is off the crosstown, some from the high school, some from Countryside grade school, some from Colonial Church, some from Countryside park; plus the regular traffic from the neighborhoods. Please pass on this e-mail to all City Leaders listed below: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Mayor James Hovland Council member Joni Bennett Council member Mary Brindle Council member Scott Housh Council member Ann Swenson Planning commissioner Stephen Brown Planning commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning commissioner Michael Fischer Planning commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning commissioner Julie Risser Planning commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning commissioner Kevin Staunton Susan Howl From: Kevin McCoy [mailto:kmccoy2 @comcast.net] RECEIVED Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:03 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhoogenakken @ci.edina.mn.us JUN 2 1 2010 Subject: Yard Sign Opposition to The Waters Development Hello, Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague Jackie Hoogenakker Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Hello City Leaders of Edina and Ms. Hoogenakker, We want you to have the Yard Sign roster (attached as a separate PDF) which represents between 368 and 490 property owners /residents /taxpayers /voters in the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group that are opposed to the previous and current revised plans, and what it means to display a Yard Sign in front of your home. The Yard Signs are to inform and demonstrate to residents and City Leadership that there are a significant number of residents in this area that opposed the previous Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation Living Waters Plans, and currently oppose the Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 submitted to the City of Edina by the Church and Developer. This Neighborhood group has worked in good faith with the Developer and Church and unfortunately we have not been able to come up with an acceptable agreement. We ask respectfully for you to reject the plans being presented at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission and July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting, and demand the Church and Developer come up with plans that are more complementary to the symmetry and character of the neighborhood; plans that are more in line in size and scope of the other one and two story buildings in this solely residential area. Households presenting their yard signs have done so diligently since March 2010 and they still are displayed, that is over three months. We were asked to be on TV with Channel 5 and there is an attachment that explains that further and it also is copied below. Though not presented below there is a PDF attached capturing Why did we decide on yard signs? We decided on yard signs in an effort to communicate concerns pertaining to the proposed Waters Development. A website (www.edinacountryside.com) and an interactive phone system (952- 929 -1447) were developed. If you go to the About Us page of the website it explains the concerns of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood at the onset. I have copied it below for your reference. I also have copied our current position after meeting in good faith with the Church and Developer below as well. With the use of the website and the phone, these two technologies offered residents the ability to request a lawn sign to spread the word and share their concern and opposition. We also had many volunteers walking door to door to inform Edina Residents to become informed and form your own opinion. Attached for your review per your request are households that requested a lawn sign as a result of being informed and taking their stance. A summary of this data is captured below and replicated in the attached PDF as follows: Two hundred forty five (245) yard signs were distributed. Of those, 184 are referenced in the attached spreadsheet. This equates to approximately 368 residents assuming two or more residents per household. 61 lawn signs were not tracked on the spreadsheet because volunteers didn't collect the household data when going door to door. Based on this data there is between 368 to 490 [(368 +61) *2 ] voting residents with signs on their lawn. Similar information is being gathered of those who signed a petition and will be presented once complete in the coming days. If you have questions please allow us the opportunity to answer them. Thank you for the time and consideration, Kevin McCoy 5809 Jeff Place Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group Countryside Neighborhood Yard Sign Displayers Oppose the Current Revised Plans of May 28, 2010 —May 2010 to the Present The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group appreciates the efforts of Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation to make changes to the project based on the comments that were received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood that attended the meetings in April and May of 2010. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front fagade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project as was submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale economic activity. The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building — i.e.., 139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The only buildings of similar mass and scope are Valley View Middle School and three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual acid aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one point we want make very clear: the Countryside Neighborhood Group are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible: The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non - profit senior housing project could be self- sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Residential Countryside Neighborhood. The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Countryside Neighborhood Yard Sign Displayers Opposed the Plans of Dec 29, 2010 — March 2010 — May 2010 Hundreds of signs declaring, "Save Countryside Neighborhood," have popped up all over Edina. We hope they express the sense of urgency our neighbors and we feel for our neighborhood as well as for all of Edina. We want everyone who loves and appreciates the charm of our neighborhood and city to understand the reasons for our concern and what is at stake for us all. Three of Edina's extraordinary blessings, Bredesen Park and nature preserve, Countryside Park, and the unique landmark of Colonial Church, form the southern boundary of our neighborhood. On .February 16, 2010, the Edina City Council gave preliminary approval for Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to build a four -story, 150 -unit apartment facility within this special area. The aerial view above shows how large the intended complex will be. The proposed building is represented by the large red marking. The finer red lines represent the proposed parking. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group neither objects to the church's right to develop its land within current residential zoning and within Edina's comprehensive plan, nor do we object to a senior - living facility. We simply feel the for- profit apartment complex is far too large for a residential neighborhood. Our hope is to convince both the church and developer to reduce the facility to a scale our neighborhood can support, and with a design we can all be proud of. As planned, the apartment building itself will be two football fields in length and nearly 70 -feet high. It will dwarf not only our homes, but all other surrounding structures including the church itself. It will be more than twice the height of the new Edina fire. station that it will stand beside, and will overshadow Countryside Park across the street. In addition to the facility, another 75,000 square feet, nearly 2 acres of land, will be used for parking and sidewalks, and more than 300 trees will be cut down. The impact this gigantic project will have on the environment is considerable. The additional traffic it will generate, not only with automobiles of residents, visitors and employees, but in the large number of multi -axle service vehicles necessary to support the facility is also considerable. The short-term, monthly leases suggest a high frequency of moving- trucks. This new heavy traffic will flow around three sides of Countryside Park (and the children and families who play there), which is slated to be extensively upgraded. The park is already bounded by two major arteries, busy Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue. More traffic, more noise, more danger, and more pollution cannot but detract from this special public area. Edina's Comprehensive Plan, adopted to guide the city's future, made clear that while change is inevitable and not to be feared, if properly planned for and managed, change can make Edina even better for the coming years. The key, as our Edina Comprehensive Plan requires, is to assure that development is first and foremost compatible with the neighborhood. By its very magnitude, we strongly feel this planned apartment complex is far too large for the site and the neighborhood. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group hopes to convince the church, the developer and our City Council to reject this plan in favor of one of appropriate proportions. We have a very short window to appeal to the City of Edina, Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to reconsider the scale of this project. Of broader concern for all of Edina is the possibility of Colonial Church, a non - profit organization, gaining approval from the city to change zoning currently calling for residential use to one that would allow for an upscale, for - profit, commercial mega- apartment building in a quiet, residential neighborhood — against the stated wishes of the neighborhood. If allowed in our neighborhood, it can happen anywhere in Edina. Thank you for learning more, and for any help you can provide — whether it be volunteering your time and money to help offset the costs of protecting our neighborhood (and Edina), by signing a petition if you agree with our concerns, by attending neighborhood meetings to get more information, or for your willingness to show your support by placing a sign in your yard to help educate your neighbors. We hope to meet you at our next Neighborhood Meeting! Please click on the 'Attend Meetings' button on our Home Page for a full calendar of events. If you would like to speak with one of your neighbors, please call our phone number at 952 - 929 -1447 (option 4) and leave a message. Someone will call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood As reported by KSTP Channel 5 Eyewitness News on April 15, 2010 Neighborhood worried about apartment complex Submitted by Robert Moses on Thursday, April 15th, 6:16 pm People who live in Edina's Countryside neighborhood are concerned about a proposed 150 -unit senior housing complex planned for a six -acre tract next to Colonial Church. You need only drive through the neighborhood to see the opposition. "Save Countryside Neighborhood" signs have sprouted up on dozens -- if not hundreds -- of lawns. Members of the neighborhood group aren't opposed to the development itself. They just want it scaled back. They say a four -story tall building doesn't fit into a neighborhood full of homes that are one or two stories. They'd like to see the size of the complex cut in half. The church, which donated the land on which the building will be built, tells me it will continue to work with neighbors to address their concerns. As I covered this story, I started to see this isn't two a story about two diametrically opposed sides. Each side seems willing to work with the other to hear its concerns. The city council has to sign off on the development before construction starts. I'm told ground could be broken by next spring. Click here for more on the story. Edina residents fight church plans for senior housing Some who live in Edina are opposing a church's plan to build a senior housing complex. Colonial Church wants to build a four -story, 150 unit apartment complex on six acres of land adjacent to the church at Colonial Way and Tracy Avenue. Ted Yoch, a member of the Colonial Church Land Development Task Force, said, "We've been working on this for three and a half years. We worked with the city. We've had some studies done. This is the kind of senior housing that Edina needs and wants." The church gave the land to the Shelter Corporation to build the structure. In return the church will own 30 percent of the complex. The deal would also allow the city to collect property tax revenue, which it does not collect from the church. People who live in the Countryside neighborhood near the church have started to put up lawn signs opposing the project. They say they are not opposed to the project in general, just its scale. Spencer Turner of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group said, "What we are opposed to is the size of it and all the accompanying problems that come with that large size, one of which is the increased burden of traffic on this area." "We're all willing to compromise because of the understanding that there could be a nice addition," said Barbara Hoganson, also of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group. Church officials said they will continue to work with neighbors who are concerned about the complex. Yoch said, "It's going to be a good thing for them and we're working at trying to make some changes that will make it more palatable for them." Yoch would not tell 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS what those changes might be. He said he will meet with neighbors to hear their concerns before presenting a proposal to the city's planning commission. The city council has to give its approval before construction begins. First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs R Clark and Tina Bain 5812 Amy Dr 920 -1806 thefoodpalette @aol.com 1 Sohiela Mirsharif 5905 Amy Dr 929 -0477 1 Cassandra & Matt Headrick 5920 Amy Dr 920 -9752 cmuldoon200l @yahoo.com 1 Kirk & Kris Swenson 5924 Amy Dr 926 -2476 kswenson7 @comcast.net 1 Burton Shacter 5800 Arbour Ave 920 -8324 bbshacter @comcast.net 1 Tony & Sonja Michael Roy Totzke 5900 5904 Arbour Ave Arbour Ave 926 -1029 922 -5500 1 1 Nancy & Kirk Peter & Mary Mathison Mulheran 5908 5940 Arbour Ave Arbour Ave 922 -0733 933 -5947 downdraft @live.com petem @sani - blast.com 1 1 Tony & Michele Bob & Betty Sandy John & Jeanne LeFebvre Edwards Maloney St. Pierre 6020 6112 6000 6005 Arbour Ave Arbour Ave Arbour Lane Arbour Lane 920 -8847 929 -5676 797 -6049 929 -0175 mtlefebvre @comcast.net sgilinterpreter @hotmail.com jst.pierre @comcast.net 1 1 2 1 Erik & Kari Vanderbilt 6012 Arbour Lane 928 -3853 1 Bill & Judith Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane 927 -9421 jbr62 @earthlink.net 1 Grace Mary Brad Kelly McDonald Boyd 5701 6216 5212 Ayrshire Blvd Belmore Lane Benton Ave 920 -4208 938 -2215 612 - 554 -1679 bboyd0l @gmail.com 1 1 1 Linda Enck 5700 Benton Ave 925 -2386 slamenck @comcast.net 1 Cindy Dino Yu Balafas 5708 5316 Benton Ave Blake Road 919- 601 -4695 930 -3873 yu_xinying @yahoo.com balafasl @gmail.com 1 1 Bonnie Waddick 6008 Chapel Drive 996 -9479 katherinejill @hotmail.com 1 Joseph Judy Nancy & Mario Patrick & Tina Portillo Petts Lopez Willette 5412 5416 5420 5517 Countryside Rd Countryside Rd Countryside Rd Countryside Rd 927 -4384 922 -1917 920 -2416 lopezgrubb @yahoo.com patrickwillette @hotmail.com 1 1 1 1 Mike Hagenson 5612 Countryside Rd 925 -4280 mike.a.hagenson @medtronic.com 1 Karl Gensheimer 5616 Countryside Rd 1 Suzanne Thoresen 5621 Countryside Rd 926 -1231 shoresen @aol.com 1 Carmen & Robert Eide 6013 Crescent Dr 612 - 850 -6730 Carmeneide @yahoo.com 1 Tim & Lauren McNamara 6201 Crescent Dr 926 -6154 1 Bernard Bjerken 6204 Crescent Dr 929 -2320 1 Seth Griak 6208 Crescent Dr 1 David Lowe 6213 Crescent Dr 920 -9621 1 Robert Granson 6217 Crescent Dr 926 -7527 1 Jenny Covington 6229 Crescent Dr 303 -5047 cov1000 @gmail.com 1 David and Sharon Strand 6236 Crescent Dr 1 Dorothy & Robert Pool 6241 Crescent Dr 929 -5465 2 Ruth & Wayne Kewitsch 5624 Doron Dr 829 -5911 rkewitsch @gmail.com 1 Tyler Christopherson 5833 Eastview Dr 920 -4544 tcchristopherson @gmail.com 1 Doug & Molly Van Metre 5224 Forslin Drive 928 -9285 vanmetred @msn.com 1 Theresa Williams 6701 Galway Dr 942 -5775 1 Kristin Peterson 5604 Gate Park Road 651 - 398 -2133 kristin.peterson @msn.com 1 Manuel Amaya 6904 Gleason Ave milikan_2000 @yahoo.com 1 Ron Fraboni 5505 Grove St 925 -9327 Frabonimn @earthlink.net 1 Sue Clasen 5600 Grove St 926 -6445 sueclasen @comcast.net 2 Greg & Rose Rustad 5616 Grove St 929 -8906 rkrustad @comcast.net 1 live on Hanson Morgan 5716 Hansen 612- 532 -9943 no email given 1 Jim IGrace 6012 Hansen Rd 928 -0758 gracegrund @comcast.net 1 Cindy lNelson 6120 Hansen Rd 925 -3613 cindy_I_nelson @uhc.com 1 Page 1 of 4 First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs Christine Ehrlich 5701 Hawkes Dr 426 -1142 cehrlich70 @gmail.com 1 Susan Chandler 5709 Hawkes Dr 929 -8464 Stcedina @aol.com 1 David & Susan Nelson 5701 Hawkes Terr 922 -1141 sumacandnelski @gmail.com 1 Farkhod & Madina Salamov 5708 Hawkes Terr 288 -5531 farkhodbek @yahoo.com 1 Timothy & Marian Olson 6201 Hillside Rd tolson7515 @aol.com 1 Alfreda Terry 6204 Hillside Rd 920 -6927 1 Spencer Turner 6208 Hillside Rd 929 -6216 sturnerl2 @comcast.net 1 Tony Olson 6209 Hillside Rd 240 -1402 adollh @yahoo.com 1 Jeff & Susan Petersen 6213 Hillside Rd 927 -6200 edinaite @yahoo.com 1 Mark Videle 6300 Hillside Rd 612 - 207 -6951 mvidele @comcast.net 1 Mark Evenson 6304 Hillside Rd mevenson @carlsonprint.com 1 David and Jean Wikoff 6305 Hillside Rd 925 -4230 djwikoff @comcast.net 2 Delores Storm 6308 Hillside Rd 1 James Ostlund 6309 Hillside Rd 1 Pam Loffhagen 5801 Jeff PI 927 -4137 1 Jim & Liz Beer 5804 Jeff PI 922 -0164 jbeer5804 @gmail.com 1 David & MaryAnn Meyer 5805 Jeff PI 927 -4904 dfineyer @mindspring.com 1 Tom &Jenny Weber 5808 Jeff PI 925 -4210 1 Kevin & Anne McCoy 5809 Jeff PI 928 -9940 annemccoy @comcast.net 1 Ray & Marsha Giske 5812 Jeff PI 920 -6930 1 Chuck & Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff PI 920 -1931 christine.henninger @genmills.com 1 Steve & Linda Chambers 5820 Jeff PI 929 -3323 1 David White 5821 Jeff PI 1 Doug & Patty Barber 5824 Jeff PI 925 -3181 barberd @divtechusa.com 1 Larry & Dot Kerzner 5828 Jeff PI 928 -9431 dkerzner @comcast.net 1 Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff PI 926 -1763 barbarahoganson @comcast.net 1 John Harden 5829 Jeff PI 926 -1764 Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff PI 925 -1016 gjjohnson3 @comcast.net 5 Dadi & Penny Setiadi 5841 Jeff PI dadi_S @yahoo.com 1 Catherine Marble 6712 Limerick Lane clm @info9.net 1 Ann & Kendall Compton 5201 Lochloy Drive 925 -1630 anncompton @comcast.net 1 Joe Lambrecht 5324 Maddox Lane 612 - 986 -9691 josephiambrecht @yahoo.com 1 Dennis Seemann 5700 Olinger Blvd 925 -4123 2 Karen Jarvey 5704 Olinger Blvd 922 -7277 1 Jed Jr & Cindy Jenkins 5708 Olinger Blvd 270 -4501 jsjenkins @stthomas.edu 1 Jose and Toby Hanson 5712 Olinger Blvd josehanson @comcast.net 1 Karen Gooch 5800 Olinger Blvd 285 -9088 gogetgooch @hotmail.com 1 Jonathan Rosenberg 5808 Olinger Blvd 1 Mike & Jayne Lonergan 5812 Olinger Blvd 928 -0237 1 Bill & Judy Johnson 5816 Olinger Blvd 922 -6929 bljohnson2008 @comcast.net 1 Stephen & Jessica Berg 5820 Olinger Blvd 922 -0142 NINETWENTY @EARTHLINK.NET 1 Franz & JoAnne Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd 920 -1529 franzsr @aol.com 1 Elizabeth & Eric Jensen 5916 Olinger Blvd 922 -4337 elizabeth.jensen @comcast.net 1 Mark Guettler 5920 Olinger Blvd 926 -0904 mark_guettier @yahoo.com 1 Ying Qi 6101 Olinger Blvd 1 Gary Mackenzie 6105 Olinger Blvd 1 Paul & Anita Axt 6109 Olinger Blvd 925 -1440 pauljaxt @gmail.com 1 Skip & Marta Melin 6111 Olinger Blvd 922 -4964 williammeiin @gmail.com 1 Robert & Carolyn Hagen 5720 Olinger Rd 920 -2602 chagen42 @yahoo.com 1 Amanda IKimmet 5725 Olinger Rd 651 - 210 -7480 glaciergirl84 @gmail.com 1 Page 2 of 4 First Name Last Name Street # Street Name Phone Email address # of Signs David Simons 5725 Olinger Rd Jim Tabor 5829 Olinger Rd tabo0006 @msn.com 1 Dennis & Laurie Eckberg 5902 Olinger Rd cjedennis @comcast.net 1 Jim and Jane Sletten 5906 Olinger Rd 927 -9419 JJDTS @aol.com 1 Brice Martinson 6100 Ridgeway Rd 1 Jennie Johnson 6108 Ridgeway Rd 612 - 532 -1307 Jennie @jenniesays.com 1 Paul & Janet Fredrickson 6112 Ridgeway Rd 922 -3450 1 Ms Patrice Sullivan 6120 Ridgeway Rd 836 -0417 smiley05l3 @msn.com 1 Karen & Rich Holetz 6100 Sherman Cir 848 -2040 kholetz @comcast.net 2 Peggy & David Dodge 6117 Sherman Cir 920 -4431 pegdodge @comcast.net 1 Molly Urbanski 5800 Stuart Ave 926 -1258 urbys @comcast.net 1 Eileen O'Shaughnessy 4216 Sunnyside Rd 920 -9812 oshau001 @umn.edu 1 Michael Dunn 4808 Townes Rd 926 -6898 Mikejodunn @comcast.net 1 Kenneth Kjelland 5600 Tracy Ave 2 Mark Aronson 5601 Tracy Ave 929 -5155 1 Richard Conkey 5605 Tracy Ave 1 Kent and Holly Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave 922 -8596 kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com 1 Jim and Kathy Michelle & Darrell Toth Hart 5621 5708 Tracy Ave Tracy Ave 612 - 961 -0444 925 -2184 jtoth3 @gmail.com 1 2 Thomas Widmark 5712 Tracy Ave 920 -3534 1 Andrea Moonen 5715 Tracy Ave 451 -8718 andrea @jadetcm.com 2 Jason & Michelle Kalenborn 5801 Tracy Ave 922 -4947 jkalenborn @comcast.net 1 Rosemary Sundin 5805 Tracy Ave 1 Rochelle Lackner 5821 Tracy Ave 1 Melvin Gregerson 5909 Tracy Ave 1 Leland & Monica Myhre 6000 Tracy Ave 929 -1581 1 Lance Sanders 6009 Tracy Ave 1 Bruce Utne 6013 Tracy Ave 922 -9188 1 Herman Bains 6101 Tracy Ave 929 -9362 hhbains @aol.com 1 Bill Cosgrove 6104 Tracy Ave 1 John Klus 6105 Tracy Ave 1 Harvey & MaryAnn Havir 6108 Tracy Ave 929 -8725 hhavir @nbs- inc.com 1 Phil & Diana Larson 6109 Tracy Ave plmn777 @comcast.net 1 Scott & Carol Haarstad 6113 Tracy Ave 920 -9093 scott_haarstad @yahoo.com 1 Alexandre Pimkine 6201 Tracy Ave 1 Jack & Dianne Glaeser 6205 Tracy Ave 929 -0900 1 Elaine Tripp 6209 Tracy Ave 922 -7394 1 Delite & Karl Dick 6213 Tracy Ave 929 -1267 2 David and Tami Pries 6613 Tracy Ave 944 -2301 1 Ken ? 5140 Valley View Rd 681 -2674 k2020visionstudios @ yahoo.com 1 Tim O'Shaughnessy 6308 Valley View Rd 612 309 -2489 oshag6325 @yahoo.com 3 Cori O'Shaughnessy 6308 Valley View Rd 484 -5448 corioshaughnessy @gmail.com Bryan & Stephanie Rhody 6319 Valley View Rd rhodys @msn.com 1 Jenn Enriquez 6308 Vernon Ave S 763 - 807 -3650 JennEnriquez @yahoo.com 1 Tara Fossum 5920 View Lane 612 - 735 -1171 tourette97 @aol.com 1 Kristin & Jon Engman 5236 W 56th St 1 Kathleen Dahlheimer 4801 W 60th St Kdahlheimer @comcast.net 1 Tracey and Tom lilies 5200 W 61st St 285 -6554 ttillies @aol.com 1 Norbert Domek 5800 W 61st St 929 -8832 1 Marvin IHelgeson 5804 W 61st St 1 Page 3 of 4 First Name Last Name Street q Street Name Phone Email address q of Signs Doug & Bridget Baird 5805 W 61st St 926 -6818 bridget.baird @target.com 1 Tyson & Erin Schmidtke 5809 W 61st St ruehleem @hotmail.cm 1 Susan Clark 5812 1 W 61st St 927 -0959 jhoward612 @comcast.net 1 Chip Howard 5812 W 61st St 927 -0959 Robert Neuman 5816 W 61st St 929 -9359 1 Sally Peterson 5817 W 61st St 1 John Mobarry 5820 W 61st St 929 -3715 1 Jeff Wesselman 5624 W 66th St 303 -5853 jdwess @comcast.net 1 Colby Wilkins 4515 W 70th St 1 Josh Sprague 4720 W 70th St 612 - 501 -0252 1 Allene & Roy Burns 5708 Warden Ave 929 -1560 alleneburns @msn.com 1 Joyce & Jim Sutherland 6104 Westridge Blvd 927 -8390 1 Lisa Hawks 6112 Westridge Blvd 1 Paul & Julie Anderson 6121 Westridge Blvd 929 -9687 1 Nydia Carver 6219 Westridge Blvd 426 -0202 nydiacarver @yahoo.com 1 Tim & Annette Kuck 6316 Westwood Court 933 -1441 kuckhouse @comcast.net 1 Peter Brauer 6328 Wilryan Ave 935 -5322 peter_b_brauer @hotmail.com 1 Jim Schedin 6041 Wooddale Ave 926 -1126 schedvi @hotmail.com 1 Jim & Elaine Allen 5708 Wycliffe Rd 929 -7382 1 John Hoe[ 6217 Wyman Ave unlisted johnhoel @mac.com 1 Dennis and Joan Wuebker 6220 Wyman Ave 929 -3729 Twebbies @aol.com 1 Sue IKeator 5041 Yvonne Terrace 922 -1824 chickadeedee55 @gmail.com 1 Tracked & Recorded Households (above) 184 Untracked Households 61 Total Lawn Signs Posted 245 Of the 184 referenced, some residents requested additional signs to give to other interested residents -- Of the 184 referenced, some residents requested 2 signs for their corner lot The 61 untracked resulted from door to door volunteer's not capturing the data Assumption of two or more adults occupied each home therefore between 368 to 490 residents are represented Page 4 of 4 Susan Howl RECEIVED From: philb [ mailto:philipjbohrer @yahoo.com] JI1M 11 XV Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:42 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker; Lynette Biunno Subject: Opposition to the rezoning and development plans for the "Waters" senior center project as submitted on May 28, 2010 Jackie Hoogenakker, My wife and I wish to go on record as being opposed to the final rezoning and development plans for the "Waters" senior center project as submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, we are very concerned that a Large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals will irrevocably alter the character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot, for - profit apartment complex being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale commercial activity. The resulting commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. We believed and trusted that there would be no commercial activity in our neighborhood when we purchased our home. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on us as we had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. We are adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. We respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plan. Please forward this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker; Honorable Mayor James Hovland; Council Member Joni Bennett; Council Member Mary Brindle; Council Member Scot Housh; Council Member Ann Swenson; Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown; Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter; Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer; Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest; Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel; Planning Commissioner Julie Risser; Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer; Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder; Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Thank you, Phil Bohrer and Jean McDowall 5900 Amy Drive, Edina, MN Susan Howl RECEIVA.ti JUN 2 12010 From: Bruce Artmann [ma I Ito: 96shadowrider@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 2:09 PM To: Lynette Biunno; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Rezoning for Colonial Church development Please forward this email to the Mayor, all members of the City Council, all members of the Planning Board and any other city employees involved in this process. If this request is improper by your rules, please tell me what I need to do to let these people know about my concerns. Thanks My name is Bruce Artmann. My wife, Cheryl, and I have lived at 6117 Tracy Ave since October, 1985. I was a Paid -on -Call member of the Edina Fire Department for over 14 years. My wife and I have discussed this project since it was first proposed. We even made some calls about moving my mother into it. I will see the new development from my front yard and possibly out my front window. Nothing I've seen or read about causes me any concerns. I was even okay with the initial proposal. I see it as an improvement to our neighborhood. I don't believe it will cause me any significant traffic problems since it is located right off the freeway. The traffic on Tracy is most congested before and after the high school is in session. Since the people who will be living at the new complex will be retired, I don't see them adding much to the traffic flow. My wife and I want to voice our support for this project and strongly urge you to approve it. Thank you � CHURCH � A Place to Grow in Christ and Serve the world 6200 Colonial Way Edina, MN 55436 (952) 925 -2711 Fax: (952) 925 -1591 www.colonialchurch.org June 17, 2010 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50P Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, RECEIVED JUN 2 1161 My name is Daniel Harrell and I have very recently begun my tenure as Senior Minister at Colonial Church. As you know, this is a vibrant congregation with an active membership and a long history of concern and care for the city of Edina. I look forward to our becoming acquainted. My family and I have just recently moved from Boston and are very much enjoying what is to be our new home in your city. I have been apprised of the desire of Colonial Church to work toward the construction of the Waters Senior Living Center adjacent to our church. While I am too new to offer anything other than an outsider's initial perspective, I do want to assure you of this congregation's genuine intention to serve and benefit the city of Edina for the sake of the faith we profess. While it is our hope that the Commission and Council will look favorably on the Waters proposal and the good services it plans to provide for citizens in Edina, rest assured that whatever the outcome, we will remain committed to being good neighbors in Edina and faithful stewards of all that this church has been given. S' cerely, Rev. Dr. Daniel M. Harrell, Ph.D Senior Minister RECEIVED JUN 211010 L:6 x 21 A7 L7 Z L-6-1 - Susan Howl Subject: FW: The Waters Senior Living Center RECEIVED JUN 21 2010 From: Peggy & Frank [mailto:peggyfrank @att.net] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 12:17 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: The Waters Senior Living Center We are looking forward to being able to stay in a nice place in Edina, with the benefit of being close to our church and family. Please know we have been faithful in supporting the schools, parks, and activities Edina has offered or requested through the years . We won't be staying in our home forever, but would like to stay in our dear Edina ..... and not head to Friendship Village, where most of our friends now go. We look forward to your decisions on the subject. Blessings, Peggy and Frank Johnson, 4701 White Oaks Road. RECEIVED Susan Howl JUN 212010 Cary, please have this forwarded to all the members of the Council and Planning Commission. I hate to add to the number of emails you have all been receiving on the "Waters" issue. However, I believe I must: Barring something unforeseen, I will be out of town and not in attendance at the June 30 Planning Commission meeting. After the fifth or sixth email hit my inbox this morning, I called a sender at random. I explained that the reason I called him was that his was the most recent forwarded email. I did not express an opinion in favor of or against the "Waters." I did tell him that flooding my email inbox did not illuminate the issue. In fact, I said, it might be counterproductive just because of the possible aggravation. I explained to him that from my standpoint, numbers for and numbers against didn't really make a difference. The Commission's role is not to count heads, but rather to examine a proposal and determine whether or not the proposal was good or bad for the city as a whole, and whether it fits within the plan, ordinances, rules, and standards by which the Commission operates. I also added that it made sense to make sure a person's name was correctly spelled. He thanked me for the discussion, and said that he was under the impression that it was important to have a great number of communications to the Commission members. As I said, I pointed out that it would not have made a difference to me, and that I would be more interested in what comments were to be presented at the public hearing. Parenthetically, repetition of an argument adds nothing to the validity of the point. I was merely expressing the point that I didn't want to have my office email box filled up with emails unnecessarily and that I was about ready to put a block on anything coming from the City of Edina. So, I plead guilty to adding to the number. I apologize. Since I am a Commissioner, I feel compelled to add this to the record in spite of the fact that I will not be in attendance on the 301h I case anyone wonders, I am not expressing an opinion on the Waters issue and have not come to a conclusion on the issue. Please don't reply to this Regards, Floyd FLOYD GRABIEL 4817 Wilford Way Edina, MN 55435 (h) 952/920 -1048 (w) 651/490-2774 fax: 651/765-5202 ' Susan Howl Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below- - RECEIVED Gordon Hughes, City Manager JUN 1 11010 Cary Teague Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members, Commissioners, Mr. Hughes and Teague: I write to share my concerns over the proposed Colonial Church senior citizen development. Though I share my neighbors overall concerns, I also have a very specific concern about traffic and the safety problems it poses for my child and others on my street. I live at the southwest corner of Crescent and Westridge. We have numerous children who ride their bikes and scooters, people walking dogs, seniors taking walks, etc. in our vicinity. The intersection of Crescent and Westridge is a problematic one because a steep hill makes visability of other cars, pedestrians, etc. an issue. There are no signs or traffic controls of any kind in this area. Westridge feeds onto Valley View which then continues to Tracy. Crescent curves westward to Hillside and continues to Tracy. I have noted on many occasions that drivers come through from the north on Westridge very fast and turn onto Crescent rather than Valley View to avoid the Valley View /Tracy intersection back -up. Further, traffic from Valley View also turns onto Westridge and Crescent and traffic from Tracy onto Hillside for the same reason. Apparently, drivers already perceive the current traffic control system at the Tracy /Valley View /62 intersection to be inadequate to meet the communities needs. With the additional traffic flow that this development will cause in the Countryside community, I fear that drivers will use my street (Crescent) as a shortcut to avoid the Tracy/Valley View/ 62 interchange more and more often. This poses a signficant safety risk for children at play and pedestrians. I've seen no impact studies on this issue. Nor, have I seen any concrete traffic control plans which would address these issues. I would imagine that additional specific traffic issues like the one I've explained above exist throughout the neighborhood. How does the City of Edina plan to manage the safety risks to children and pedestrians posed by the greatly increased traffic flow from and to this development? Jenny A. Covington 6229 Crescent Dr Susan Howl From: Thomas Cooner [mailto:cooner.thomas89 @gmail.com] RECEIVED Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 10:20 AM To: Lynette Biunno JUN 2 12010 Cc: mike.fischer @lhbcorp.com Subject: Colonial Church of Edina in Support of the Waters Senior Living Center To the Edina City Council members and Edina Planning Commission 6/21/10 Thank You for your service to our community. Colonial Church of Edina has been very responsive and inclusive to the well being of the community. Colonial Church of Edina has had many open meetings seeking the neighborhood input and their response. It has sought to be be responsive to those inputs and requests. Colonial Church of Edina has sought a project for the needs of Edina and its greater community. Colonial Church of Edina's project will have minimum impact on the neighborhood. The Waters Senior Living Center although it will be a beautiful and elegant building; it will be environmentally screened from the neighborhood by trees and visually limited from the street view. The Waters will be a beneficial service to the seniors and to their families of Edina and the greater community. Pleas support the building of the Waters Senior Living Center. Thank for your support of this benefit to the city of Edina Thank you Tom Cooner 5004 York Ave S. 'Susan Howl iubject: FW: City Rules From: Merlin1954 @aol.com [mailto: Merlin 1954 @aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:42 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: City Rules To the city officials listed below, RECEIVED JUN 2 12010 Why does the City Council think it's like the tornado in the Wizard of Oz, whirling a foreign object (a commercial monster) into Munchkinville (residential family homes)? If all bets are off and the rules don't matter, then everyone else in Edina can make their own rules. Well, here's a new rule: Don't vote for any elected city official who tries to circumvent city rules without telling the city. Thank you. Donna Callender Countryside Road Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker; Honorable Mayor James Hovland; Council Member Joni Bennett; Council Member Mary Brindle; Council Member Scot Housh; Council Member Ann Swenson; Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown; Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter; Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer; Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest; Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel; Planning Commissioner Julie Risser; Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer; Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder; Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton RECEIVED Susan Howl i , 3010 Dear City Leaders: My husband, children and I are residents of the Countryside neighborhood. We relocated here from Minneapolis and chose Edina for its overall reputation, fabulous schools, engaged community members and proximity to downtown. We chose the Countryside neighborhood because of the quiet streets, big yards, proximate playgrounds and Bredesen Park. One can argue that are neighborhood has more than single family dwellings today. After all, we have Countryside school, the fire station, Colonial Church and The Jehovah's Witness buildings in the immediate neighborhood. However, I would argue that all of these buildings blend into their surroundings. They are tastefully designed and their dimensions, relative to the property they sit on, allow them to be compatible with the neighborhood. They provide city services and places to gather and worship. None are for profit organizations. When I moved into the neighborhood, it didn't even cross my mind that commercial activity would disrupt the place I call home. I realize that Colonial Church has the right to develop their property. However, I believe that the local homeowners, the tax payers, the neighbors have a right to demand that the development doesn't radically change the look and feel of the surrounding area. I appreciate that Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation have heard our input and have gone back to the drawing board. I appreciate that they have reduced the height and number of units and made the architecture more appealing. However, as a homeowner, I still feel that a. 195,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood is out of place and will forever change the character of the neighborhood. As a mother of small children, I worry that the addition of a large, high density housing project will create significant parking and traffic issues and compromise our neighborhoods' safety for pedestrians. As an Edina resident and tax payer, I worry that zoning doesn't seem as sacred as once believed and I wonder what this means for the future development of our great suburb. I realize I may not be able to save this precious green space that exists today, but I hope this letter resonates with you and compels you to demand a smaller senior housing project. I am sure that Shelter Corporation, Colonial Church, and the neighborhood can work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Countryside Neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to the upcoming Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Sincerely, Jan Helgeson 5804 West 61s` Street 952.303.6107 Susan Howl From: John Harden [mailto:JHarden @hardeninc.com] Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 8:39 PM RECEIVED To: James Hovland Cc: Lynette Biunno .;UN Z 1 1010 Subject: RE: To the Honorable Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: Thank you for your response to my earlier email. While I very much recall you meeting with the neighborhood group last March in the parking lot (you took notes which impressed several of us!), you have, in fact, refused to meet further with our leadership to answer the very questions we attempted to get answered at last Tuesday's meeting (I believe your actual words were, "It isn't going to happen. "). I am sorry if the information we received prior to the Tuesday Council meeting may not agree with what you feel is the purpose of this meeting. We were told our questions were appropriate, and we felt frustrated that with the clock winding down, we still do not know how the proposed Waters - Colonial project will be approved or denied. From the Tuesday meeting, I DO now understand how the request for a stop sign is considered! And since my email to you, we have discovered code 850. I have learned that: "The Commission shall recommend approval by the Council upon finding that the proposed development: 1. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 2. Is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan. 3. will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; 4. will not result in an overly intensive land use; 5. will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; 6. conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and 7. provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features." I also learned that, "The Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Section. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by this Section; (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms of this Section. Finally, I learned that "while an affirmative vote of three -fifths of all members of the Council shall be required to grant preliminary rezoning approval. Provided, however, a rezoning from any residential zoning district to any nonresidential zoning district shall require an affirmative vote of four -fifths of all members of the Council. We are all on the same page and would agree we want the process to be fair for everyone. Or as you say, "Win- Win." Just to repeat, the Countryside Neighborhood group does not oppose senior housing in our neighborhood. From the very beginning this has been about size and scope (and a design we can all be proud of if we can get that far). John From: James Hovland [ mailto :jhovland @krausehovland.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 2:48 PM To: John Harden Subject: FW: To the Honorable Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: Mr.. Harden, just to be clear, I have never refused to meet with people in the Countryside neighborhood and, in fact, I met with about 50 folks from the neighborhood early this Spring in the parking lot behind the fire station to discuss concerns relative to this proposed project and better understand their viewpoint on the proposed senior residence. I also had a conversation with the neighborhood attorney, Dan Rasmus, the night before last and we are trying to coordinate another meeting with at least portions of the neighborhood before the anticipated Council meeting in late July. I have always been willing to meet with concerned residents on both sides of a variety of issues and that personal practice continues. It is good to seek "win /win" solutions where possible and sometimes meetings outside the context of a public hearing can be helpful in accomplishing that purpose. That strategy doesn't always work but it is always worth the effort. As to the meeting on Tuesday night, the Public Comment portion of the agenda is designed for just that, public comment or expressions of concern on issues that are not otherwise on the agenda. Public Comment is not designed for dialogue with the Council but is meant to express concerns that are taken under advisement or referred to staff for further investigation. If a dozen people had shown up from Colonial Church or elsewhere that were proponents and would have wanted to discuss process related issues, we would have been reluctant to hear them as well as we don't want any de facto public hearings to occur on matters that are scheduled to come before us at a future date. In fact, the Public Comment section used to clearly indicate that no one could speak on an issue that was scheduled for a future Council agenda. Ms. Henninger, who incidentally did a very articulate job of expressing concerns and making inquiries, was effective in conveying the thoughts of the group but to let everyone speak would have been inappropriate and unfair. It was not my intention to insult anyone and if anyone felt insulted, they have my apologies. My efforts at all times are to treat people with dignity and respect. James B. Hovland Krause & Hovland, Chtd. 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612- 874 -8550 612 - 874 -9362 (fax) From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:29 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: To the Honorable Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: John Harden [mailto:]Harden @hardeninc.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:24 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: To the Honorable Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: To the Honorable Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: I want to write to express my personal disappointment in your behavior toward the 25 residents of the Countryside neighborhood that took the time to come to last Tuesday's Council Meeting. As a resident of the neighborhood, I can tell you that many of us have struggled with what we feel has been an unfair process from the beginning regarding the for - profit commercial development being proposed by Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation. You have insisted on keeping the communication on this issue "fair," but what is fair about the influence and communication of Shelter Corporation with you and other city officials over the past few years. Residents are getting a late start and fighting, what appears to me, a group that has already made up its mind long ago. Residents have also attempted to have other meetings to understand the "process," but you have refused to meet with them. You have stated that you need a reason to NOT vote for the proposal, but shouldn't you have valid reasons TO vote for it that represent ALL constituencies and stakeholders - including, especially including, the neighborhood? The residents who attended this past Tuesday were simply there to gain a better understanding of what the decision process is (what the rules are) so that they can effectively present their views to the Planning Commission and the Council. It was NOT their intent to do a "serial" whatever it was that you said were concerned about, but rather simply to better understand. I personally felt that you dismissed, and insulted, the entire group by your jumping to conclusions and dismissing their right to ask questions they were told by city officials they had the right to ask, and should ask. What amazes me from attending this meeting, is that the city has a nine step process to determine whether a stop sign should go in a neighborhood, but when the Council was asked to help residents understand the purpose of a comprehensive plan, and the process for making a decision to ignore it, and ignore zoning for that matter, you burst into flames and said it's just a "big picture" guide. Then what ARE the rules? Are they secret? Does a $40 million project that will alter the personality of a neighborhood deserve as much of a thoughtful public process as a stop sign? While I now at least know how you approach that issue, I don't have a clue on how you will consider this mega - project. That is unacceptable, and you should apologize to the residents who spent time to put together thoughtful, acceptable, appropriate questions which you simply assumed was an agenda, and dismissed. Your action was an inappropriate abuse of power and leadership, and intimidated the group at the time. You owe these residents, and the citizens of Edina, a clear, stated process by which important decisions that impact thousands of families and millions of dollars of their personal investment will be made - other than your secret interpretation of the "big picture." If you would like to discuss this further, I can be reached at 952.920.2626. Sincerely, John Harden 5829 Jeff Place Susan Howl From: bill cosgrove [mailto:bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu] Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 10:05 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Letter to Edina City Council and Planning Commission Members Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Thank you. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton June 19, 2010 RECEIVED JUN 212010 Dear City Council Members and Planning Commissioners, I am a relatively recent resident of Edina. My wife and I moved in fewer than three years ago. During this time, we've been especially curious about and alert to public and civic activities in our new community. As a result, we've noticed some things about Edina as a city that we might not have noticed otherwise. First, the city seems well -run with attentive administrators, hardworking and interested elected representatives, reasonable and sensibly restrictive city codes and statutes, and a dynamic citizenry participating in city activities, changes, and growth. The result is beautiful parks, well - preserved open spaces, well- situated, carefully planned homes, and controlled development emphasizing residential and single - family dwellings. Virtually all commercial and business ventures seem designed to respect the primacy of residents, families, and flourishing neighborhoods. A second thing I have noticed is the surprising ease with which changes in neighborhoods are allowed. Specifically, we were surprised to learn that our neighborhood apparently has a part of it being rezoned from R -1 at the behest of a church -- Colonial Church of Edina -- in order to allow The Shelter Corporation to build a large commercial building for senior citizens. It seems that Colonial Church wishes to produce immediate income from the sale of its land and ongoing income from the business the large building will generate. In spite of our alertness to activities in our new neighborhood, we were unaware of the process of this change from the R -1 designation until a neighbor called it to my attention in March. This process did not seem to us to be in keeping with what we had heard, seen, and grown to expect of the city's attentiveness to transparency during our 2+ years in Edina. Third, what has become apparent in the meantime is that this process of changing the zoning is to facilitate the construction of a large commercial building that is strikingly at odds with the neighborhood we moved into in size, height, appearance, and use. What is now being called The Waters Senior Living of Edina is too large for the space and neighborhood, we feel, and its for - profit nature is inappropriate to its surrounding R -1 residents. While my wife and I are retired and perhaps destined for some form of retirement community in the future, the proposed Waters project -- presently 139 units, 3 stories, 200 yards long, and over 200,000 square feet -- is far too excessive, expensive, and much larger than we would ever want to live in. And clearly inappropriate for the nature and spirit of the immediate surrounding neighborhood. The size and scope of the proposed commercial building and business will generate heavy traffic flowing around three sides of Countryside Park. We have made good use of this park, and are glad to hear that it is slated to be extensively upgraded into one of the city's foremost parks. More traffic, more noise, more pollution, however, can only detract from this valuable public area which is so busy this summer with tennis players, basketball players, children in the play area, and Little Leaguers playing baseball games watched by hundreds of parents. It is my understanding, moreover, that E�dina's Comprehensive Plan, the outline adopted some years ago to guide the city's future growth, requires that development be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. I take consistent to mean it should also be compatible and complementary to the immediate area. As other cities have shown, if properly planned for and managed, development can make a great city like Edina even better in future years. But by its very magnitude this proposed facility goes far beyond the guidelines the city has set for sustainable development. And once this huge building is underway, once the trees are cut and excavation begun, it may be too late to reverse such a compromising of this beautiful residential area of Edina. I am writing to all of you as members of the Edina City Council and Planning Commission to respectfully request that you reject this plan proposed by The Shelter Corporation to construct a too - large, incompatible, inappropriate, and unnecessarily intrusive building in the middle of Edina. And to impress upon its representatives that any such building should be of appropriate proportions, compatible with the residential neighborhood in appearance and use, and complementary to our own homes and other surrounding structures. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bill and Peggy Cosgrove 6104 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 Bill Cosgrove Professor Emeritus of English North Dakota State University 6104 Tracy Ave. So. Edina, MN 55436 952- 929 -1393 bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Housing RECEIVED JUN 21 2010 From: Susan [mailto:spetersen4 @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5:15 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: anne Mccoy Subject: Waters Senior Housing I am a concerned citizen who is opposed to development for a senior commercial building in a residential area. I have lived in Edina for over 30 years and can't understand why you want to destroy our neighborhood. Our neighborhood is just off Tracy and we already have to deal with heavy traffic and by putting in a hugh senior building,it will only make it worst. I have never heard of a city changing their comprehensive plan to accommodate a hugh commericial building for a church. It is totally unreasonable to build such an enormous commercial building on church property in a residential neighborhood. Susan Petersen Susan Howl From: John Klus [mailto:johnklus @comcast.net] RECEIVED Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 11:20 PM JUN 2 11010 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Honorable Mayor James Hovland; Council Member Joni Bennett; Council Member Mary Brindle; Council Member Scot Housh; Council Member Ann Swenson; Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown; Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter; Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer; Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest; Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel; Planning Commissioner Julie Risser; Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer; Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder; Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Mr. Jay Jensen, Shelter Corporation, 1600 Hopkins Crossroads, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Mr. Ted Yoch, Colonial Church, Edina, Minnesota RE: Waters Senior Living at Colonial Church Dear Mr. Jensen and Mr. Yoch: This follows the meeting at Colonial Church on May 20, and the submission on May 28 of the final application for the Waters Senior Living development at Colonial Church. First, I want to thank you for the hospitality you extended to the Countryside Neighborhood Group at the meeting on May 20. I know members of the grou- appreciate the spirit in which you explained the changes to the project following the comments received at th, community input meetings in April. The group also appreciates your efforts to make changes to the project based on the comments you received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front facade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the vast majority of the Countryside residents I represent remain dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale economic activity. The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope ane size of the building — i.e.., 139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The only buildings of similar mass and scope are Valley View Middle School and three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one point I want make very clear: the Countryside residents are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size and scope of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non - profit senior housing project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that you enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Countryside Neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you, and receiving an invitation for my clients to continue their dialogue with you on these important matters. Sincerely, RASMUS LAW OFFICE, LLC Dan Rasmus, Attorney at Law David D. Murphy RECEIVED Annaway Drive Edina, Minnesota 55436 JUN 18 2010 Dear Edina City Council members, I write to endorse the approval of the Waters Senior Living proposal that will soon come before the Council. I grew up in Edina, raised my family in Edina and now live as an empty nester with my wife in Edina. I consider such a development a very worthy part of Edina's future. My support is based on rationale for the good of Edina as a whole with consideration of the nearby community. Edina needs more senior housing. Our family loves our town; in fact two of my three grown children still live in Minneapolis and hope to live in Edina someday (when they can afford to). They have also expressed their support for the development. My mother, an 85 year old widow, has expressed her desire to live in the Waters should it be approved. A wide spectrum of housing options is good for the city. When seniors move to The Waters, their homes will be available for young families like my adult children. Our tax base grows and new blood comes to Edina. I understand that the building is carefully designed to enhance the local neighborhood. The building is only three stories tall and 139 units. The design includes attractive architectural features that will make the residents proud to live there and enhance the community. I know that the church has been a wonderful part of the local neighborhood for many years and an attractive addition to the Countryside community. I am confident that this extension of the Colonial village will be just as positive an addition to the area. Few Edina residents could argue that Colonial has not been a wonderful addition to our city. From the information I have learned, it sounds like the planning for this development has been thoughtful and within the planning guidelines of the city. I hope the Council approves The Waters plan. Thank you. Si David D. Murphy RECEIVED Dear Mayor Hovland, JUN 18 2010 6/15/10 I wanted to drop you note to express my support for the The Waters Senior Living of Edina building project to that is being proposed to be built adjacent to Colonial Church of Edina. I am a life long member of the Church and was with the Church when we moved from the 56`" and Wooddale Ave. location to our current location. We had received a lot of concern from the neighborhood then before we built the new Church, and many of the concerns are the same then as they are now (size of the building, site lines, house values etc.). We have strived to be good neighbors and a positive force in the community. We listened to the legitimate concerns of the neighborhood and the concerns you noted when the proposal was brought before you and the City Council. Changes have been made to the design and scope of the project that address these concerns and hopefully you and the City Council will agree and allow this project to continue. I believe it wili prove worthy to the community, to the seniors who will live there, and yes, the neighborhood. Similar, to the overall benefits the Church has added to the community and the neighborhood over the last 30 plus years. On a more personal note, my step mother, who lives in Edina in the condominiums off of Brookside and 44`h street, is starting to consider possible alternative living situations. Betty has lived independently since my father's death and loves living in Edina and our community. She attends Colonial Church and would like to as long as she is able. Betty is in her mid 80's and thankfully in wonderful health. But she is a realist and knows she may not always be able to live on her own as she likes. A living environment like the one at the proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina is the perfect situation of graduated assistance as she needs it coupled with a love of our city and closeness to the Church that she attends. She can only hope that the project will be finished and ready to move in before she needs to move out of a completely independent living environment. Thank you for your consideration, Sinc ly, Paul Cavanor June 17, 2010 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, RECEIVU) JUH is in I am not a resident of Edina but I visit Colonial Church two or more times per week for worship services and various meetings. My wife and I live in a single- family home in rural Carver County and we are beginning the search process for our next home ... some sort of senior community in the western /southwestern suburbs. We are very interested in the Waters Senior Housing Community because it appears to fit our future needs and interests very well. I hope the council will vote to approve this much - needed facility in the near future. Sincerely, Cliff Johnson 12820 Laurie Lane Chaska, MN 55318 952 - 466 -2288 Susan Howl from: Doug and Sarah Jones [mailto:doug.sarah.jones @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:01 AM RECEIVED To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Colonial Church and its proposed development JUN 110j� Council Members -- I would like to express my strong support for The Waters Senior Housing Community. As a lifelong resident of Edina and a member of Colonial Church since it was founded in 1946, I feel that Colonial has had a strong influence on the development of our community for the past 64 years. We were early supporters of The Edina ABC Foundation and have provided strong programs for the youth of our community, including Teens Encounter Christ, Pilgrim Fellowship, Vacation Bible School, Camp Pyro and Pyro II. Many of our youth have broadened their vistas through mission trips and brought their insights and experiences back home to enrich Edina. Now through The Waters, we would like to have an impact on the older population of Edina by providing senior living that will allow residents to remain in our community in a facility that will provide many amenities. It is certainly a place where Doug and I would like to live when we can no longer maintain our house on Aspasia Circle. Please help us move forward with this project. Sincerely, Sarah Hawthorne Jones Edina Class of '61 Edina Board of Education 1983 -1995 Susan Howl From: Anne McCoy [mailto:annemccoy @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 9:30 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Colonial Church project Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder City Manager Gordon Hughes project. RECEIVED JUN 18 1010 I am writing to express my deep concern with the Colonial Church and Living Waters Senior building 11 years ago, our family was expanding and we decided it was time to move into a bigger house. We were living in a smaller house in Edina, and we looked at many houses in many different areas, inside and outside of Edina. We finally decided that we wanted to stay inside Edina, one reason being that we knew what we were buying into, and we wouldn't have to worry about unknown developments happening in our back yard, as Edina is an established city with zoning in place. So we finally found the perfect house for us on Jeff Place. It is located in a nice quiet residential neighborhood, and we especially love the privacy and view within our backyard. Imagine my surprise when I learned that Colonial Church was proposing a very large building to be built next to their church. While you might think this is the perfect spot for a large building, I have quite a different feeling. Yes, it is true that when the trees in our back yard are leafed out, we probably would not see the building. But when they are not (which is 6 — 7 months of the year in Minnesota!), I would have a clear view of the building every single day from my kitchen window! Not only will I be able to see this monstrosity from my house, but I will see it every time I drive by that area, as I get on or off Hwy 62, or go to or from Valley View School, or on any of my many daily carpool trips. If built, this building will completely change the look and feel of our neighborhood, and it truly saddens fair: I understand the right or need that Colonial Church has to develop its property. I don't understand how the City of Edina can approve a change in zoning from residential to commercial. That is a huge reason that we bought the house that we did — because we didn't want to be in an area that has a commercial or busy feel to it. We wanted a nice, quiet, residential area, and we've definitely had that for the past I I years. I sure hope we'll have that for the next 20 — 30 years that we plan to stay here. I respectfully request that you vote against the revised Water's project. Sincerely, Anne McCoy 5809 Jeff Place, Edina Susan Howl From: Sue Keator [mailto:chickadeedee55 @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 7:19 AM RECEIVED To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Project - Attn: Joni Bennett ,JUN 18 1010 Council Member Bennett Please forward this letter to all City Council & Planning Commission members. June 18, 2010 I am writing to express my displeasure with the current situation in the Countryside neighborhood. The proposed Waters development is totally out of proportion for the neighborhood and sets a terrible precedent for the city of Edina. I am a 12 year resident of Edina and one of the things that attracted me to the city was its wonderful family neighborhoods. I do not live in Countryside but I have friends who do. The proposed building is far too large for the site and will bring too much traffic to an already heavily travelled Tracy Avenue. The possible addition of a bike trail through Bredesen Park and the neighborhood will only compound the problem. The fact that the project does not really comply with the proposed zoning change is another concern to me. It seems the benefit of this project will be for the church rather than for the neighbors. I do not begrudge the church making money, but a for - profit enterprise does not belong in a residential neighborhood. A project like this would be far better in the Grandview area which is quite close to where I live. At least there it would be close to services that residents would need. I would ask that you and the Planning Commission and City Council reject this proposal unless Shelter Corp. and Colonial Church far reduce the size of the project. Yours truly, Susan N. Keator 5041 Yvonne Terrace Edina MN 55436 Susan Howl From: Bridget.Baird [mailto:Bridget.Baird @target.com] RECEIVED Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:29 PM JUN 18 7010 To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Bridget.Baird Subject: Waters Senior Living at Colonial Church Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Dear City Leaders: My husband, children and I are residents of the Countryside neighborhood. We relocated here from Chicago in 2002 and chose Edina for its overall reputation, fabulous schools, engaged community members and proximity to downtown. We chose the Countryside neighborhood because of the quiet streets, big yards, proximate playgrounds and Bredesen Park. One can argue that are neighborhood has more than single family dwellings today. After all, we have Countryside school, the fire station, Colonial Church and The Jehovah's Witness buildings in the immediate neighborhood. However, I would argue that all of these buildings blend into their surroundings. They are tastefully designed and their dimensions, relative to the property they sit on, allow them to be compatible with the neighborhood. They provide city services and places to gather and worship. None are for profit organizations. When I moved into the neighborhood, it didn't even cross my mind that commercial activity would disrupt the place I call home. I realize that Colonial Church has the right to develop their property. However, I believe that the local homeowners, the tax payers, the neighbors have a right to demand that the development doesn't radically change the look and feel of the surrounding area. I appreciate that Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation have heard our input and have gone back to the drawing board. I appreciate that they have reduced the height and number of units and made the architecture more appealing. However, as a homeowner, I still feel that a 195,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood is out of place and will forever change the character of the neighborhood. As a mother of two small boys, I worry that the addition of a large, high density housing project will create significant parking and traffic issues and compromise our neighborhoods' safety for-pedestrians. As an Edina resident and tax payer, I worry that zoning doesn't seem as sacred as once believed and I wonder what this means for the future development of our great suburb. I realize I may not be able to save this precious green space that exists today, but I hope this letter resonates with you and compels you to demand a smaller senior housing project. I am sure that Shelter Corporation, Colonial Church, and the neighborhood can work together to formulate a development plan for the . Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Countryside Neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to the upcoming Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Sincerely, Bridget Baird 5805 West 61St Street 952.926.6818 2 Susan Howl From: Kirk Swenson [mailto:kswenson7 @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:44 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters senior living complex - Three Rivers Bike Trail RECEIVED To: Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Gordon Hughes, City Manager JUN 18 2010 I am writing to you to express my concerns relative to the senior housing project and bike trail proposed for my neighborhood. With regards to the senior living complex I have the following concerns: The size of the project will bring increased congestion to the neighborhood resulting in someone recommending stop lights at various intersections. Many senior housing projects are financially currently distressed, what happens if demand is not met, do the developers have the ability to maintain the property, will tennant qualifications be relaxed. Will section 8 be allowed? A shiny new building is appealing now, what happens in 20, 30, 40, or 50 years, when the facility can no longer garner the high rents anticipated. It seems that a facility of this size, if allowed to deteriorate could create a concentration of lower income housing, diminishing home values, destroying a strong neighborhood. With regards to the bike path I have the following concerns: Bredesen Park has been a neighborhood asset to families for many years. The bike path is used by families with small children. My fear is that the proposed bike path may increase use of Bredesen's paths by avid bike enthusiasts who tend to ride at higher speeds making it unsafe for families to use the Bredesen bike path. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input. I trust that you will consider the long term affects these proposals may have on a strong neighborhood and act prudently. Once these initiatives.are completed we will not be able to reverse the adverse affects these proposals may have on the neighborhood. Kirk Swenson Susan Howl ' Subject: FW: We oppose the new development RECEIVED JUN 18 1010 From: FARKHODBEK [mailto:farkhodbek @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:08 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: We oppose the new development We oppose the building! The building will negatively effect the traffic and property values in our neighborhoods. This email represents: Farkhod Salamov and Madina Salamova 5708 Hawkes terrace Thanks, Farkhod & Madina - -- On Thu, 6/17/10, Barbara Hoganson <barbarahoganson@comcast.net> wrote: From: Barbara Hoganson <barbarahoganson @comcast.net> Subject: PLEASE EMAIL City Council and Planning Commission - AND OTHER DATES TO REMEMBER To: edinacountryside @googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 12:08 PM Hello Edina Countryside Neighbors and Greater Edina Residents Please go to www.edinacountryside.com /news and look at the four most recent posts. We are now down to the remaining things that are critical. To really make a difference we need to have a very large turn out at the June 30tH and July 20thm just like we did at the Colonial Church meetings in April. There is not substitute for your physical presence! In addition, we need you to EMAIL the CITY LEADERSHIP now and share your concerns. PLEASE EMAIL YOUR CONCERNS TO CITY COUNCIL and PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS 1. We confirmed there are now only 21 letters /emails on file at the City supporting the proposed senior complex, and only 31 letters /emails that oppose it. If you oppose this complex as proposed we really need your assistance to please send an email to the City Leadership expressing your concerns regarding the Revised Living Waters Application. 2. You can copy the CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION names below. and email to —se Susan Howl Subject: FW: More About Edina Countryside Concerns and How to Best Present at Planning Commission June 30 and City Council Meeting of July 20 Attachments: final_ 11x17_ conceptFinal.pdf; Countryside_proof Final.pdf; 271StreetPark.jpg; 264StreetPark2.jpg; 261CityLot.jpg; 258ThirdParking.jpg; synagogue for sale and a congregation in flux.pdf R;:CFIVE From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto:barbarahoganson @comcast.net] ��N 8 Z�iO Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:54 PM To: Gordon Hughes; Lynette Biunno Cc: Cary Teague Subject: More About Edina Countryside Concerns and How to Best Present at Planning Commission June 30 and City Council Meeting of July 20 Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Dear City Leadership, I am sending this information as I have been involved in the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group since its beginning. So that you have more background about the questions and concerns, and I am not aware of any other forum to communicate this information, I thought it would be helpful to email it to you. We understand the importance of your role to take all stakeholders requests into account in making your decisions; including the City, Neighborhoods as property owners, taxpayers and voters, Colonial Church the property owner, and Shelter Corp the Developer. We have taken your lead to work in good faith with Shelter Corp and Colonial Church and have unfortunately not come to an acceptable agreement. I have summarized some current and background information that I thought would be helpful in your evaluation process. The letter from our attorney on file identifies the Neighborhood's group official position. In addition, some of us had the opportunity to participate in Planning Commission Meetings and City Council Meetings this last month. We have some observations, questions, and concerns that I would like to share. We appreciate that the Planning Commission was welcoming and supportive in the Community Comment section. However, we were struck by the amount of time that was needed by the Planning Commission to vet the parking lot of CVS at the May 2010 meeting; they spent two hours vetting a parking lot of a 14,000 square foot building (CVS Pharmacy) in an already commercial area. In the end the decision was deferred to the June 2010 meeting; the developer did not receive his approval. This June 30th Planning Commission Meeting is where the $44 million Colonial Church /Shelter Corp project is slated for that same Agenda. How will this work? The Colonial Church /Shelter Corp building is 20 times that of the CVS building and being on such a massive scale with so many more implications and impacts; including impacts to over 1,000 homes in this neighborhood. There are 300 homes within 1,000 feet that received notices, and over 1,500 homes within a mile radius of the proposed property. The parking lot proposed is nearly 2 acres by itself. It will be very helpful for us to understand the process we must follow now so we can be prepared to be the most effective, as we are defending our greatest treasure, our homes and our neighborhood. We want to follow the rules, play fair, be heard, and not be dismissed. Being able to vet a $44 million in 3 minute increments is a very challenging endeavor, if not impossible, especially when the City and Church and Developer has what really feels to be an unfair advantage of vetting it months if not years prior. We were dismissed at the City Council Meeting when we tried to ask general questions in June to get some of our questions answered, and understand at this next meeting in July for the City Council Meeting we will be able to ask more questions. But what does that really mean? In all due respect, can't you see that residents are crying out for a forum to be heard, to dialogue, to ask questions? The existing process is just not working. Please tell us understand exactly what we need to do so we come prepared to the Planning Commission Meeting on June 30, 2010, and to the City Council Meeting on July 20th so we will have an equally fair advantage to present our case. We do understand that our attorney can ask for some time. How much time will he be allotted? How much time will the residents be allotted if we are speaking on different topics? How long does this meeting go for as we have residents with kids and jobs that they need to get back to or up for? If there is a question, I have seen on the video that the City Leadership asks for clarification to the Developer and Church, but after their response, the residents can't say anything, even when you know what was said is not accurate, or there is a different point of view that is equally as valid, and should be presented as a contra argument to what was just said. How can this policy or process be changed so that we hear all sides before these important meetings? There are many questions, concerns, and ideas as you will see below. Plus more that have not yet been listed. We have asked for working session so we can lay out all of our questions, concerns, and ideas, and get to the bottom of things, but we were denied the request by the City Leadership. We understand that the City and the Developer and Church have had working sessions all along this process for months, and the biggest stakeholder, the % of billion dollar property owners have not been represented at these working sessions. If residents can't have an open forum to work together at this lowest level of government then this really becomes impossible, and saddens me greatly. I know this challenge is a solvable one if we all figure it out together. Thank you for reviewing this information, and giving direction to the questions. We have a great city and feel very fortunate to be part of it. Some More Information about the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group, of some background information that may be helpful in your Evaluation Process 1. Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is a group of concerned neighbors that have organized to share our concerns around the Proposed Living Waters Project of Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation. We have been meeting at the Edina Fire station from March 1 — through the present. We hired Dan Rasmus as our attorney to represent our interests. 2. 1 know you have heard a lot already but thought it might be helpful if we highlighted some of our concerns. Some of these are included on our website, www.edinacount[yside.com. To make it easier for you, I have copied the information below. Additional information has been added plus relevant attachments have been provided. 3. We have distributed 250 Yard signs to people that oppose this proposed Development as is. These neighbors have displayed their signs in their yards since March 2010 and they are still displayed in their Yards today. "Save Countryside Neighborhood ". There is an article below plus letters to the Sun that describes why we think our neighborhood needs to be saved. Please see an example of the sign attached and referred to as Countryside proof Final.pdf 4. We have an estimated 314 people that have opted into our Google Groups opposed to the Proposed Colonial Church /Shelter Corp Developments as of today. Please see the 314 count below. We typically have one email for each household, so that may put the list closer to 600 if both adults were included. We have not verified if that is the case but we have found that most people in the household have the same opposition to the project. Also, we have close to another 20 some people that don't have emails that are part of our group. Go,.,g1e groups o EdinaCountryside Management tasks Gfou s Review pending messages Review pending members Manage members Invite me All members {314} Managers (1) Bouncing Banned (3) Open Invitations Set delivery type -1 OK set membership type . V OK 314 5. Welcome to the Save Countryside Neighborhood Website! Save Countryside Neighborhood from what? Well, we tell you below. Hundreds of signs declaring, "Save Countryside Neighborhood," have popped up all over Edina. We hope they express the sense of urgency our neighbors and we feel for our neighborhood as well as for all of Edina. We want everyone who loves and appreciates the charm of our neighborhood and city to understand the reasons for our concern and what is at stake for us all. Three of Edina's extraordinary blessings, Bredesen Park and nature preserve, Countryside Park, and the unique landmark of Colonial Church, form the southern boundary of our neighborhood. On February 16, 2010, the Edina City Council gave preliminary approval for Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to build a four -story, 150 -unit apartment facility within this special area. The aerial view above shows how large the intended complex will be. The proposed building is represented by the large red marking. The finer red lines represent the proposed parking. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group neither objects to the church's right to develop its land within current residential zoning and within Edina's comprehensive plan, nor do we object to a senior - living facility. We simply feel the for - profit apartment complex is far too large for a residential neighborhood. Our hope is to convince both the church and developer to reduce the facility to a scale our neighborhood can support, and with a design we can all be proud of. As planned, the apartment building itself will be two football fields in length and nearly 70 -feet high. It will dwarf not only our homes, but all other surrounding structures including the church itself. It will be more than twice the height of the new Edina fire station that it will stand beside, and will overshadow Countryside Park across the street. In addition to the facility, another 75,000 square feet, nearly 2 acres of land, will be used for parking and sidewalks, and more than 300 trees will be cut down. The impact this gigantic project will have on the environment is considerable. The additional traffic it will generate, not only with automobiles of residents, visitors and employees, but in the large number of multi -axle service vehicles necessary to support the facility is also considerable. The short- term, monthly leases suggest a high frequency of moving - trucks. This new heavy traffic will flow around three sides of Countryside Park (and the children and families who play there), which is slated to be extensively upgraded. The park is already bounded by two major arteries, busy Olinger Boulevard and Tracy Avenue. More traffic, more noise, more danger, and more pollution cannot but detract from this special public area. Edina's Comprehensive Plan, adopted to guide the city's future, made clear that while change is. inevitable and not to be feared, if properly planned for and managed, change can make Edina even better for the coming years. The key, as our Edina Comprehensive Plan requires, is to assure that development is first and foremost compatible with the neighborhood. By its very magnitude, we strongly feel this planned apartment complex is far too large for the site and the neighborhood. Our Countryside Neighborhood Group hopes to convince the church, the developer and our City Council to reject this plan in favor of one of appropriate proportions. We have a very short window to appeal to the City of Edina, Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation to reconsider the scale of this project. Of broader concern for all of Edina is the possibility of Colonial Church, a non - profit organization, gaining approval from the city to change zoning currently calling for residential use to one that would allow for an upscale, for - profit, commercial mega - apartment building in a quiet, residential neighborhood — against the stated wishes of the neighborhood. If allowed in our neighborhood, it can happen anywhere in Edina. Thank you for learning more, and for any help you can provide — whether it be volunteering your time and money to help offset the costs of protecting our neighborhood (and Edina), by signing a petition if you agree with our concerns, by attending neighborhood meetings to get more information, or for your willingness to show your support by placing a sign in your yard to help educate your neighbors. We hope to meet you at our next Neighborhood Meeting! Please click on the `Attend Meetings' button on our Home Page for a full calendar of events. If you would like to speak with one of your neighbors, please call our phone number at 952- 929 -1447 (option 4) and leave a message. Someone will call you back as soon as possible Sincerely, The Concerned Residents of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood 6. Other articles and attachment on our website for your review. Showed up to City Hall Excited and Left Disappointed On June 15, 2010 some twenty -five neighbors attended the Edina City Council Meeting to be able to learn more about the city policies, processes, and ways we can help make our city a better place. We were informed that if we have questions, it is a good idea to attend the City Council Meetings to get answers directly from our leadership. So we did. Some of us attended the Planning Commission meeting a month earlier and we were able to ask our questions openly and with support and understanding from the Planning Commission. We were just going through the same drill but this time at the City Council meeting. We were told in advance by city representatives to make sure we ask general questions about topics that are of interest to us so we can learn more. And not to mention other named groups if they are not represented and their topics will be on the future agenda, so everything is fair. We understood that and agree that the process needs to be fair for all. We left the City Council meeting very confused, disappointed, and concerned that we were only able to get ont- question raised, and felt dismissed by City Leadership. We spent a lot of time preparing general questions so we could learn. Where do we get our questions answered if we can't ask them during the Community Comment section of the City Council Meetings? Isn't that the whole point of the Community Comment section? fhe only question we were able to raise was regarding the process that is followed for changes to the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We were not clear of the process, thus the question. A project name was never mentioned by the speaker, however the Mayor's dismissal mentioned the Living Waters Project and he assumed all our comments applied to that even when we said it is not. We simply wanted to know how things work and to better understand the process in general. We were shocked and embarrassed by the Mayor's response. The only question we could get addressed was around the process of changes to the Edina Comprehensive Plan, and the speaker shared the following verbatim. (You can watch and listen to this exchange on Channel 16, or go to www.citvofedina.com, click on City Council, Watch a Meeting, and select the June 15, 2010 Agenda, Video). "I understand the Edina Comprehensive Plan is a vision of what a city wants to be. It is a framework for shaping future growth and change, for protecting what a community values, enhancing what the community wants to improve, and creating what the community feels is lacking. According to Minnesota state law, comprehensive plans must be reviewed and updated at least once every 10 years. The Edina Comprehensive plan was updated in 2008. The City uses the comp plan to respond to development, to guide and share future development, working in conjunction with residents. The planning commission uses the comp plan as the basis for its deliberations and decisions regarding review of development applications. Property owners use it to consider potential future uses and development of property. I would like to understand the process that is followed regarding implementation of the Comp. Plan, and what the accountabilities are to residents when a change is proposed to be made to the comprehensive plan, specifically in the land use plan. It seems to me that property owners, including resident homeowners, should be able to rely upon the land -use plan included in the comprehensive plan. For example, in the updated comprehensive plan, figure 4.4 on page 33 lists "Potential Areas of Change." According to the plan, identifying these potential areas of change is an initial stage in the process of guiding new construction and development when proposed by private property owners. The plan puts Edina residents on notice that development may, potentially, occur in these areas, and perhaps is more likely to occur in these areas than in other areas. I would think that if the planning commission and city council are met with a proposal from a property owner or developer, in an area that is not one identified in the comp plan as a potential area of change, additional scrutiny and input from impacted residents should be a requirement before any such proposals are considered, and that such input from impacted residents should be given more weight than in proposed developments that are located in potential areas of change. Do you agree with this, and if not why? If you do agree with this, what are the steps that can be taken to make this process happen ?" Our speaker will be following up with the City officials to understand what happened here so we understand the protocol of the Community Comment section so we know the rules so we can be more effective. Why Now? Additional Rezoning & Subdivision Sign NOT Posted 3 1/2 Months Ago When Requested from City, and 2 Months Ago When Requested From Colonial Church Published on 2010/06/17 in News Who decided to post the other sign, and why now, thirty days before the Planning Commission Meeting of June 30, 2010? On June 15, 2010 an additional large sign for Colonial Church and Shelter Corp's Living Water project was posted on Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd giving notice of rezoning and subdivision. The Neighborhood Group requested the City staff to please post another large sign on Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd 3 1/2 months ago to give residents notice so they had the opportunity to weigh in to see how they felt about this proposed project in their neighborhood. The reason we made the request was because we live around here and knew that most people do not drive down Colonial Way, but use Olinger Blvd and Tracy. We were concerned that the sign on Colonial Way would not offer the benefit for which it was intended to do; give as many people notice as possible. ecause of the massiveness of this proposed building, most people that learned more, said "I had no idea this was so big ", and as a result, it is even more important to make sure the impacted neighbors be informed so they can express any concerns they may have. By having signs posted on Colonial Way at the site, Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd, and HW 62 and Tracy we felt more people would have the benefit of seeing the sign and to be in a position to ask more questions. And it appeared that these signs were supposed to be posted back in January 2010 when the original sign was posted on Colonial Way at the proposed site. There are a lot of pieces to this large $44 million project, and major changes are being requested, and it is very important for the neighborhood stakeholders to really understand the magnitude so they can decide how they weigh in; changing zoning to a commercial nature with all the zoning precedents that brings, creating a subdivision, amending the comprehensive plan when it was just approved in 2008 with no indication that this was an area of change, and bringing in a very large up scale senior apartment complex into a solely residential neighborhood and all that entails. The City staff responded to our request saying that other notice was provided through the newspapers and notices to homes, and there was not a need to post any other signs. We received an email from the City staff on March 8, 2010 as to this decision. In March 2010, the City Council and Planning Commission that visited the site were then again asked to please have the additional signs posted to comply with what we thought to be in the spirit of the ordinances so people could be better informed. No additional signs were posted as requested. The Colonial Church leadership was also asked to post the additional signs on April 6, 2010 when we met with them to provide them our concerns, and they said they would think about it but then informed our attorney that they were not going to do any further posting of signs. Then why now? We have asked City leadership why this sign is posted now, two weeks before the Planning Commission Meeting of June 30, 2010 where they will hear the proposed application of Colonial Church and Shelter Corp. We have not yet heard back. We will update you when we learn more. Colonial Church /Shelter Corp June 30, and July 20, 2010 Meetings Notification Published on 2010/06/17 in News Please click on the link below to review the Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation's Notice of Meetings where they will present their Final May 28, 2010 Development Application to the City of Edina Planning Commission on June 30, 2010, and the City Council Meeting, and July 20, 2010. Please read the position of the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group's response to the May 28th Final Plans and the requested next steps. Colonial Church Shelter Corp Notification of Jun 30 Plan CommissionANDJuly 20 City Council Mtcs The Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group appreciates the efforts of Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation to make changes to the project based on the comments that were received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood that attended the meetings in April and May of 2010. Specifically, the Neighborhood Group recognizes the time and effort spent in revising the plans to reduce the overall height of the building, break up the front fagade with "bump- outs," and improve the landscaping plan. Despite these changes, however, the Edina Countryside Neighborhood Group is dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project as was submitted on May 28, 2010. The fundamental problem with the current rezoning and development plans is that they do not fit with the character and symmetry of the Countryside Neighborhood as required under City ordinance. Concerning the rezoning plan, the Countryside residents are very concerned that a large, for - profit enterprise, that will benefit only a relatively small number of individuals, would irrevocably alter the charming character of their residential neighborhood. There is no precedent for a 195,000 square foot profit- center being placed in the center of a residential Edina neighborhood that does not have even small -scale economic activity. The creation of commercial activity will disrupt forever the tranquil and domestic nature of the neighborhood. No residents believed there would be commercial activity in their neighborhood when they purchased their homes. It is unfair and unjust to impose such activity on residents who had no reasonable expectation such changes would occur. Concerning the development plan, the Countryside residents continue to be adamantly opposed to the scope and size of the building — i.e.., 139 units, three stories, forty -four feet high and two hundred yards in length. Again, there is no precedent for such a building in the Countryside Neighborhood. The only buildings of similar mass and scope are Valley View Middle School and three times the size of Countryside Elementary School. A building like the one proposed will dramatically and adversely alter the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Rather than viewing parkland, trees and sky, residents along Tracy Avenue and Olinger Boulevard, as well as residents of the entire neighborhood, will be confronted with a bulky, grey box by day and parking lot lights by night. There is one point we want make very clear: the Countryside Neighborhood Group are not opposed to the Colonial property being developed for senior housing. In point of fact, they believe that senior housing is a good idea and would serve the needs of the Edina community. Their main objection, as has been repeatedly stated, has to do with the size and scope of the project. You have stated you cannot scale back the size:and scope'of the building because a smaller project is not economically feasible. The residents strongly reject this conclusion because it is based on the premise the project must generate revenue for Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church. Clearly, a smaller, non - profit senior housing project could be self - sustaining, economically feasible, and more in keeping with the character and symmetry of Countryside Neighborhood. Based on the above, the Countryside residents respectfully request that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church withdraw the current rezoning and development plans. The residents request that Colonial Church and Shelter Coroporation enter into continued dialogue with them as stakeholders and work together to formulate a development plan for the Colonial Church property that provides senior housing, but that also better respects the needs of the Residential Countryside Neighborhood. Minnesota Business 2008 Article on Shelter Corporation It mentions 125 units back in 2008. But Shelter and Colonial said it had to be 150, and then with Neighborhood pushback it is reduced slightly to 139. MN Business 2008 Shelter Corp Feature- 125 units Letter to the editor published in Edina Sun Current May 6, 2010 2010 05 06 Countryside comments obscuring legitimate community Letter to the editor published in Edina Sun Current May 6, 2010 05 06 Size, process are concern, not seniors Letter to the editor published in Edina Sun Current April 29, 2010 2010 04 29 Site not appropriate for big g evelopment Article published in the Edina Sun Current April 15, 2010 2010 04 15 Countryside Neighborhood fights senior housing proposal Letter to the Editor in Edina Sun Current March 25, 2010 2010 03 25 Project too big Letter to the Editor in Edina Sun Current March 4, 2010 2010 03 04 Project moving too fast Colonial Church Meeting Announcement, April 6, and April 8, 2010 — 6:30 PM Published on 2010/06/17 Colonial Church /Shelter Corp Meetinc Notice for April 6 and April 8, 2010 Note:.We are currently waiting for Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation to respond to concerns expressed by more than 200 neighbors who attended these meetings. We expect a response meeting by the end of April. Here's More Helpful Information The following documents are provided to assist you further in understanding the issues. Please take a look at the Summary Sheet and FAQ's that were put together by the Countryside Neighbor Group to give you some key points about the Shelter Corporation's Proposed Development. Colonial Church Living Waters Project Detail Summary Sheet.doc Good Things are Happening in Countryside! The Proposed Colonial Church/Shelter Corp (Living Waters) Project has been a very strong force to further unite those neighbors of the Countryside Neighborhood Community that are very concerned about the very large project that has been preliminarily approved by the City Council of Edina, February 16, 2010. March 17, 2010 — Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board Meeting The concerned Countryside Neighbors filled the room on March 17, 2010 for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's monthly Board Meeting. The Neighborhood Spokesperson communicated the many concerns of the Neighborhood regarding this very large complex being proposed in the Edina Countryside area. The Watershed District indicated they would provide written responses to the questions being raised within the next week. Edina Countryside Upgrades (make sure all is looked at in total and not in a silo) From: John Keprios [ma iIto:]Keprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:17 PM To: John Harden Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: RE: One neighbor's glance at the Countryside Park plans... John: Thank you for your email. I appreciate your comments The hockey rink is proposed to be placed in the proper north/south orientation because it becomes the first rink in the City to lose its ice along the south facing boards. The size and type of warming is yet to be determined. The photo of the replacement is misleading. When funding is available, it is my intent to have a neighborhood committee help design a new wanning house that fits the needs of the park, neighborhood and character of its surroundings. It may very well be similar to the new larger park shelter buildings at Weber and Cornelia School Park. Decomposition of organic matter under the ice is a problem at most of our outdoor skating rinks at the end of each skating season. That is the cause of the foul odor. It is difficult to build outdoor ice in a green manner on soils that don't emit those gases. Your suggestion to relocate the proposed regional trail is noted and I will share that comment with Three Rivers Park District. Funding has become a significant issue due to Minnesota State Legislature imposed levy limits and loss of Market Value Homestead Credit. Staff are asked to take voluntary furloughs; salaries are frozen; car allowances eliminated; full -time and part -time positions are being frozen or eliminated and services are being reduced. In other words, the timing of capital improvement plans for the entire park system is difficult to predict at this point due to available funding. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 70430 Fax: (952) 826-0385 jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs" From: John Harden [mailto:JHarden @hardeninc.com] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:07 PM To: John Keprios Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: One neighbor's glance at the Countryside Park plans... John, Barbara Hoganson sent these plans to me for "neighbor comment." I have a couple that I would be interested in your reaction... My initial glance is that the the earlier plans have been scaled waaaay down to save money - basically almost everything is placed the same as before except for rotating the hockey rink (which I don't think was even included in the earlier plans) and replacing the warming house with a teenie- weenie new one. I personally feel that this neighborhood has drawn the short straw compared to buildings that went in at Weber Park and Cornelia. Build something we can all be proud off, and it will be used all year. Put in a token building, and be disappointed with the results. If you want to save money, just leave the "sledding hill" where it is to protect the rink from the north winter wind, and it will also block some of the view of whatever ends up going in on the Colonial land. However, this plan will relieve some traffic on the south side compared to an earlier plan that put one baseball diamond there. On the other hand, it will compound traffic problems if the bike trail remains on the north side of the park. This would be another argument to run the trail down Colonial Way with an exit by the Fire Station. I sincerely hope that this plan includes improvement of the soil in the park. The whole park needs about three feet of good soil that allows for drainage, etc. Our kids never skated there in the winter because it smelled like a cow pasture. John 10 From: John Keprios [mailto:JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 3:43 PM To: Barbara Hoganson Subject: RE: Question about Countryside Park Development Barbara: Here is a copy of the Master Plan. It is not online. If you have any questions.. feel free to contact me. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios ci.edina.mn.us "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs" From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto:barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 10:46 AM To: John Keprios Subject: Question about Countryside Park Development Hello John, Thank you again for presenting the Countryside Park Development Plans. Are the Countryside Park Development Plans available on -line for residents to view now? If not, would you be able to describe what the key changes will be made as there is some confusion as to what will be where and we want to make sure we understand the facts? And please specify what will be done along the Colonial Way Road side too. Thanks, Barbara Hoganson The Three River's District Info Bike Trail, Edina Segment down 01in>?er Blvd, and Tracy This bike trail is being proposed to go down Olinger Blvd and Tracy — How about Colonial Way instead? Here is some more correspondence that could be helpful. All of this needs to be looked at as a total. From: John Keprios [mailto:JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 4:10 PM To: Barbara Hoganson Cc: Cary Teague; Jack Sullivan Subject: RE: Proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Map through Olinger Blvd and Tracy Avenue Barbara: 11 Here are Three Rivers Park District Planning Manager Kelly Grissman's responses to your questions that I asked her to respond to: 2 - No significant increased vehicular traffic is anticipated. There maybe a be a few cars a day that would park in Bredesen Park to access the trail, but it would not be comparable by any means to the amount of vehicular traffic associated with a youth baseball game. 4 - The City Council and Park District Board of Commissioners are responsible for determining whether Route 5F or a combination of 5, 5D, and 5E is preferred. The big differences between the two appear to be cost, potential environmental impacts, trail accessibility, and access to the school. The regulatory bodies will prioritize these difference and select the preferred route. 7 - Three Rivers Park District has police officers dedicated to patrolling regional trails. Park District data indicates that regional trails are safe and that no violent crime has been reported on Three Rivers Park District Regional Trails. The trails are designed as multi -use and safely accommodate walking, biking, in- line skating, running, and other non - motorized recreational uses. However, the existing trails through Bredesen Park separate pedestrian and bicyclist, the proposed route recommends doing the same within Bredesen Park. 8 - Again, regional trails are multi -use and are designed for pedestrian use and safety. Route 5 provides pedestrian access to Bredesen Park, across Hwy 62 (currently I do not believe there are any pedestrian accommodations over Hwy 62 at Tracy), and potentially to the school. 10 - No. Just to clarify, the entire regional trail is expected to generate 500,000 annual visits. No one section is expected to receive this useage because different types of users will use different trail sections and for different durations. For example, a walker (one visit) may walk for 3 miles (not the whole trail). So if the walker lives in east Edina, they will not reach the west Edina trail sections, but their visit still generates a visits and contributes to the 500,000 visits a year estimate. In addition, more and more trail users are utilizing the trail throughout the year not just 6 nice months, the estimate takes this into account. John Keprios, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Voice: (952) 826 -0430 Fax: (952) 826 -0385 jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us "We Create Community through People, Parks and Programs" From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto :barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 2:39 PM To: 'Cary Teague'; 'Jack Sullivan'; 'jkebrious @ci.edina.mn.us' Cc: 'Dan Rasmus'; 'Kent Gravelle'; 'Christine Henniger' Subject: Proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Map through Olinger Blvd and Tracy Avenue Hello Cary, Jack, and John, Thanks Carey for sending us the Three River's contact info. This was very helpful and has led us to the following information. Please clarify if we missed something. 12 Based-upon what we learned from Kelly, this new proposed plan for the bike trail will run along Olinger Blvd and Tracy, and is expected to have 500,000 people using it in a given year. In Minnesota, with the long winters this usage may be spread out over 6 months instead of the year. We understand there are two public comments meetings that are to be held June 22 at Southview Middle School, and June 30 at the same place. They will be advertised in the Sun Current. We have some questions if you could please help us out: 1. Will the traffic study for the Water's project need to be redone now with this information? 2. Or what kind of traffic impact would you expect? 3. What do you think of this Bike Trail option, or would you prefer another one? 4. Do you think it may make more sense going down Colonial Way? 5. Would you expect stoplight's to be installed? 6. And if so, where would you expect them to be installed? 7. Do you have any concerns with pedestrian safety around park usage? 8. Do you think this option is pedestrian friendly? 9. Do you think this is good time to build this with the economy and state deficit and all? 10. Are there dollars already allocated? 11. Do you have any other ideas or thoughts that would be helpful for us to know about? Thanks, Barbara Hoganson From: Kelly Grissman [ mailto: KGrissman @threeriversparkdistrict.org] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:21 AM Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Please find the attached map and narrative describing Route 5F (Olinger Boulevard /Tracy Avenue). This information as well as the meeting minutes from the last community assessment teat (CAT) meeting in which this route was discussed will be on the website in the next week or so after the CAT members have completed their review the meeting minutes. http• / /www threeriversparks org/news/ construction /planning- for - nine -mile- creek - regional- trail -in- edina.aspx Kelly Grissman Senior Manager of Planning Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 763 - 694 -7635 (direct) 763 - 557 -5248 (fax) kk rissman@ threeriversparkdistrict.orq Parkin Please take note of the Parking in Colonial Church on Sunday. We don't know if this is every Sunday. The City would need to study it. Please see the pictures that are attached for your review. Colonial during 9:00 service in April. All the lots 13 but one (the furthest from the church) were full, as was the curb -side parking in front of the chucrch all the way to Olinger Blvd. The farthest lot was 1/4 to 113 full. Parking appears that it could be a big problem. I've attached 4 samples. As you can see, the public lot owned by the city is full too.lf the Parking lot is developed for Living Waters, where will the people that are parking in the street park? We wouldn't think they should be parking in the streets as no room for emergency vehicles. We would recommend that the city study this parking issue to really determine if it will or will not be an issue. Based upon neighborhood experts at the ground level, there is a concern. Countryside Park once improved will bring more traffic, Three River's Park coming through here, will bring more traffic. Is this really the right place for this massive type of building? Then if the Three Rivers Bike Trail comes down Colonial Way, then what? What about a proof of parking agreement? Synagogue in Flux Article (or any Church) (please see recent article attached) As an example, what happens if Colonial Church does not make it, what becomes of the Church zoning? What would the Church become? What are our risks as a neighborhood? What rights would Shelter Corp have? Can we get some contractual arrangements in place to protect the neighborhood and city? And of Course there are More Topics — we will keep them coming Since the Planning Commission Meeting is only a couple of weeks away, your prompt response is greatly appreciated! Sincerely yours, Barbara Hoganson, 5829 Jeff Place, Edina, 952 - 926 -1763 14 Notices, Newspaper Coverage, and Meetings associated with The Waters . • November 16, 2009 — As recommended by staff, the developer mailed notice to residents within 1,000 feet to inform them of a neighborhood meeting to be held at Colonial Church on December 8, 2009. The meeting was to introduce the project to the neighborhood. See attached notice, mailing list map showing the area of notification. The mailing list was provided by the City. • December 8, 2009 — Developer held the neighborhood meeting at Colonial Church. • January 14, 2010 —Public Notice ran in the Sun Newspaper advertising for the January 27, public hearing at the Planning Commission. (See attached.) • January 15 , 2010 — Developer sent out the attached notice (see attached) to residents within 1,000 feet, informing them of the upcoming public hearings at the planning commission and City Council. The same mailing list map as above was used. • January 15, 2010 — City of Edina sent out Public Hearing Notices to inform residents within 1000 feet of the church site of the Planning Commission meeting to be held on January 27, 2010. See attached notice. The same mailing list map was used for this mailing. • January 25, 2010 —The project information was posted on the Planning Department Web page. • January 27, 2010 — Public Hearing held at the Planning Commission. • February 4, 2010 — Public Notice ran in the Sun Newspaper advertising for the February 16, public hearing at the City Council. (See attached.) • February 6, 2010 - Public Hearing Notices were sent out to inform residents within 1000 feet of the church site of the City Council meeting to be held on February 16, 2010. See attached notice. The same mailing list map was used for this mailing. • February 10, 2010 —Article ran in the Star Tribune. (See attached.) • February 12, 2010 — City Extra was sent to 664 people, who signed up to receive the City Council agenda for the February 16th meeting. • February 16, 2010 — Public Hearing held at the City Council. • February 25, 2010 —Article ran in the Sun Newspaper. (See attached.) o THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA THEATERS SENIOR LIVING- Proposed Senior Housing Community on the Campus of Colonial Church of Edina Neighborhood Meeting Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 7:00 p.m. at Colonial Church of Edina We invite you to attend a neighborhood meeting regarding The Waters.Senior Living and the Colonial Church of Edina's proposal to construction a senior housing building on the eastern portion of the Colonial Church campus. The senior housing is proposed to consist of 112 independent /assisted living units, 28 memory care units and 10 care suites. A rendering of the housing is enclosed. The senior housing will include the following features: • A 'Wellness Center incorporating a warm water therapy pool, an exercise area, a walking track, a spa, a beauty shop and a chapel. A comprehensive wellness program. will operate within the Wellness Center to work with seniors on their bodies, minds and spirits. • On the first floor, in addition to the Wellness Center, there will be a bistro /library /market, a parlor. a billiards room and a living room. • On the second floor there will be a kitchen with two adjacent restaurants and two additional private dining rooms, a community room, an arts and crafts room, a game room and a parlor. • The third and fourth floors will primarily consist of housing units. • The lower garage level will have approximately 100 parking spaces for residents and employees. There will also be a few housing units on the western end of the lower level. • The one, two and three bedroom apartments will have full kitchens, large closets, a screened balcony, in -unit storage, and a bay window in the living room. The two and three bedroom units will have two full bathrooms. The senior housing will also feature a "Resident First" focus where the daily living services that the residents need are brought to them as needed instead of making the resident move to another unit. The entire facility will be licensed for assisted living and will have nurse coverage 24 -hours per day. In addition, there will be a significant number of volunteers from Colonial Church involved with the residents. . If you have any questions prior to the neighborhood meeting, please e -mail me at jay asheltercorp.com. We hope to see you at the meeting. Sincerely, jay Jensen The Waters Senior Living ............ We4deSOn Paf�* if PL EVA ;Elm newspal.wi-s AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Richard Hendrickson. being duly sworn on an oath. states or affirms that he Is the Chief Financial Officer of the newspaper(s) known as Edina Sun - Current and has full knowledge of the facts stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualifica- tion as a qualified newspaper as provid- ed by Minn. Slat. §331A.02. §331A.07, and other applicable laws as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached was published in said newspaper(s) once each week, for one Successive week(s); it was first published on Thurs- day. the __14 -_ clay of _ January_. 2010, and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and in- cluding Thursday. the day of 2010; and printed below is n copy of the lower case alpha - bel from A to Z. both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: „ 1�� .dC141'nlMm.-?� :rpgrvtue : :a•; .: BY: CFO Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before me on this 14 _ day of January .2010. Notary Public MARY ANN CARLSON NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1.31 -14 �1 City of Edina (Olhoal PuakCal on) CITY OF EDINA 4001 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA. IAN 55424 NoticiZ.ot Public Hearings THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION v ll lno P.l 91 Ihd Ldm,i Cily Hall Council Chambers. 4691 "VE'sl 50111 $ Irer. 1. Onb" JedncSd .;�.Janu :dy?7.L >pi)9.,17C9Rh4, and tvdl 01 S:Iia Halle and place consider the 10110 :Nag: (7nn;lrrlp'•nt,yr. .!.j1S14_'Jcln F�Inn,n!11nQ!]1. -.�YPL @11_11 ^vcI[ :_77tH(111 r';Jrl r tl li,llll f, lr� 131 "•7n llln g -1rl 1 r ?I L.. !111 LIr �. Mal, L:olOni;li Cllur, :h /7h� :'J :,IFrS ydnidr U'�nlfj of Fi.11n;i (,200 Ccl01l„i1 VJny. Edmr,, FAN, Cuwn lrucl a 1;0-1n1 Sen:,.lr ;15 s,5leil Ovuiq laraoy. GenCIIally IVcaled norlh of C10554o17n H1tJh:•:ay F-.:2 and :•..7t.1 OI TinCy Avenue. All r commendiilions :.rnd OL•IP00(15 rnU be hoard al &.10 nleelmq. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA PLANNING COIAMISSION Debra Mangen, Cily Clerk 1Jan 14.'1,010) d1-PC12710 -JH CutteM - Thursday, Jan. 14, 2010 - www.nmSun.com In the Community, With the COmnlur, OTICES (official CI n) OF EDINA )1 WEST 50TH STREET NA, MINNESOTA 55424 10 SUMMARY BUDGET its report is to provide summary 2010 n concerning the City of Edina to inter - 'fie budget is published in accordance oc. 471.6965. This budget is not com- date budget may be examined at the DI West 50th Street or on the City's web na coo. The City Council approved this bar i5. 2009. BUDGET 2009 2010 Budget Budael $ 24,003,933 $ 24,630,355 rifts 2,797,715 2,231,760 at Revenues 36,000 36,000 721,000 721,000 'ces 2,701,480 2,702,268 5 9W.000 950,000 tments 322,772 109,382 avenues 386.200 377.000 $ 31,869.100 $ 31,757,765 ources cats Proceeds 0 230,000 istruclion Fund 203,969 15.00p0 ess Increment 200,000 765.1 Ob Iuor Fund 765.100 icing Sources 1,169,069 1,010,100 Other s $ 33,038,169 $ 32,767,665 tent 4,195,960 4,202,368 13,672,011 13, 367, 796 6,223,016 6,017,856 176,414 121,248 508,117 498,117 salion 3.847.801 3.755.473 pendiiures 5 28,623.319 $ 27,962,856 >es 1,059,639 2,050,283 3,355.211 4.030.007 ng Uses $ 4,414,850 5 6.080,290 and Other 33.038,169 34,043,148 $ 0 3(1.275.2831 Levy �- $ 24.153.933 $ 24.630.355 E EDINA CITY COUNCIL na City Clerk 2010) d1- Budget Summary =1CIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA D1 W 50TH STREET A, MINNESOTA 55424 ,IN COUNTY, MINNESOTA WILE NEIGHBORHOOD F icil will meet at the Edina City Hall on 9, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the mprovemenls to be constructed under I by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. eiahbodmod Roadway Improvements Estimated Total Assessment Cost 1 -361 5163,350.00 to be assessed by the proposed im-' all properties between and including; 9Chen Circle. proposed to be assessed at ap- ,J per residential equivalent unit. Debra Mangen, City Clerk 1, 2010) dl-BA-361 PHN -SA City of Edina (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING INTERLeGHEN BLUFF NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. 13A-374 the Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, January 19, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Inlerlachen Bluff Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Estimated Total Assessment Cosl Improvement No. BA -374 $90,800.00 The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed im- provements includes all properties between and Including: 5000 to 5061 Intedachen Bluff. These properties are proposed to be assessed at ap- proximately $11,350.00 per residential equivalent unit. Debra Mangan, City Clerk (Jan. 7& 14, 2010) dl -BA -374 PHN -SA City of Edina (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ThIft ( 03 ) 2010 gasollneyolf care with trade -In of twenty -11 (2ytg�gasollne cars and forty -seven (¢7j 2010 electric gglf care with trade-in of fifty -two (521 used electrlcg.If carp Contract No. 10-1 PK BIDS CLOSE WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2010 at 10:00 A.M. SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Mayor's Conference Room in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, January 27, 2010. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, Febru- ary 2, 2010 to consider said bids. Bids shall be in sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be ad- dressed to the Park and Recreation Director, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally. Bids received by the Park and Recreation Director, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Bids must be In conformance with specifications which are available at Edina City Hall, Park and Recreation Depart- ment. No bids will be considered unless sealed and ac- 'companied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edfna'in the amount of at least ten percent (10 %) of all bids. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids or any portion thereof. Hard copy plans and specifications are available from the City of Edina Park and Recreation Department (952.826- 0435) for a 02dreLmdablla fee of $30.00. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangan, City Clerk (Jan. 14 & 21, 2010) d1 -Bid Golf Cars New & Improved MNSun.com Legal Notices are now searchable metro -wide by keyword, such as "Auction" or "Bids." City of Edina (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MN 55424 Notica df Public Headnas THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION will meat at the Edina City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 West 50th Street, on Wednesday. January 27, 2009 at 7:00 P.M., and will at said time and place consider the following: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Overall Devel- opment Plan, Preliminary Rezonina and Preliminary Plat. Colonial ChurchfThe Waters Senior Living of Edina. 6200 Colonial Way, Edina, MN. Construct a 150 -unit senior as- sisted living facility. Generally located north of Cross -town Highway 62 and west of Tracy Avenue. All recommendations and objections will be heard at said meeting. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Debra Mangan, City Clerk (Jan. 14, 2010) dl- PC12710 -JH Certificate of Assumed Name (Official Publication) MINNESOTA SECRETARY F STATE AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME Minnesota Statutes Chapter 333 The filing of an assumed name does not provide a user with exclusive rights to that name. The filing is re- quired for consumer protection in order to enable con- sumers to be able to identity the true owner of a business. The exact assumed name under which the business is or will be conducted is: Floor Coverings International The address of the principal place of business: 5249 W 73rd St Ste K Edina, MN 55439 The name and complete street address of all persons conducting business under the above Assumed Name: JandA Enterprises Inc. . 8669 Powers PI Chanhassen, MN 55317 This certificate is.an amendment of Certificate of As- sumed Name number 3568114-2 originally filed on 11/16/2009. 1 certify that I am authorized to sign this certificate and I further certify that I understand that by signing this cer- tificate, I am subject to the penalties of perjury as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 609.48 as it I had Signed this certificate under oath. FILED: Dec. 30, 2009 /s/ Andrew Schmidt, President (Jan. 14 & 21, 2010) di- Floor Coverings International Certificate of Assumed Name (Official Publication) MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME Minnesota Statutes Chapter 333 The filing of an assumed name does not provide a user with exclusive rights to that name. The filing is re- quired for consumer protection in order to enable con- sumers to be able to identify the true owner of a business. The exact assumed name under which the business is or will be conducted Is: Uptown Cafeteria and Support Group The address of the principal place of business: 5032 France Ave S Edina, MN 55410 The name andcomplete street address of all persons conducting business under the above Assumed Name: Lake Street Cafeteria, LLC 5032 France Ave S Edina, MN 55410 This certificate is an amendment of Certificate of As- sumed Name number 3388683 -2 originally filed on 612312009 under the name Lake Street Cafeteria. I certify that I am authorized to sign this certificate and I further certify that 1 understand that by signing this cer- tificate. I am subject to the penalties of perjury as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 609.48 as if I had signed this certificate under oath. FILED: Dec. 16. 2009 iSt Barbara Marshall. CFO (Jan. 14 & 21. 2010) a4- Uptown Cafeteria and Support Certificate of Assumed (Official Put MINNESOTA SECRE CERTIFICATE OF A Minnesota Statute The filing of an assumed user with exclusive rights to if quired for consumer protectio sumers to be able to identify th State the exact assumed n ness Is or will be conducted: DUTCH CLEAN State the address of the pr 7350 Gallagher Dr 1f 153 Edina, MN 55435 List the name and complet sons conducting business under Michel Horemans 7350 Gallagher Dr 0 153 Edina, MN 55435 1 certify that 1 am authorize( I further certify that I understar tiffcate, I am subjecrto the Pam in Minnesota Statutes Section this certificate under oath: FILED: Dec. 23, 2009 /s/ t (Jan. 7 & 14, 2010) d1 Certificate of Assumed (Official Pub' MINNESOTA SECRE CERTIFICATE OF A: Minnesota Statute The filing of an assumed user with exclusive rights to It quired for consumer prolectior sumers to be able to ident'dy the State the exact assumed ni ness Is or will be conducted: Ditto & Co. Stale the address of the pri 5213 Chowen Ave S Mpls, MN 55410 List the name and complete sonsoonducting business under Gretchen Ditto 5213 Chowen Ave S Mple, MN 55410 1 certify that I am authorized I further certify that I understan liftcate, I am subject to the pena in Minnesota Statutes Section this certificate under oath. FILED: Dec. 16,21>09 (Jan. 7 & 14, 2010) c Certificate of Assumed . (Official Publi MINNESOTA SECREi CERTIFICATE OF AS Minnesota Statute: The filing of an assumed r user with exclusive rights to IN qulred for consumer protection sumers to be able to identity the Stale the exact assumed na ness is or will be conducted: Hillary Wallace Photography Stale the address of the prir 2910 W 45th St Mpla, MN 55410 List the name and complete sons conducting business under I Hillary Wallace 2010% 45th St Mple, MN 55410 I certify that I am authorized I further certify that 1 understanc tilicate, I am subject to the penal in Minnesota Statutes Section e this certificate under oath. FILED: Dec. 14, 2009 (Jan. 7 & 14. 2010) d1- Hillaq Legal Notices continu 2003 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified actin ty Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in he U 'ite,�,St t s mail copies of the attached Noti e of Public Hearing and Mailing list for �LJ�1 L (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage 1hereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B) attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names. 20 WITNESS I my hand and seal of said City this 1:; day of , Ajj"4' Edina City Clerk o 0 v 9 J�"Onp is ©a CASE FILE: 2010 - 0001 -10a Public Hearing Notice EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:00 PM Location: City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street TO: Property Owners Within 1000 Feet APPLICANT: Colonial Church PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6200 Colonial Way, Edina LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina 15t Addn. REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Subdivision approval PROPJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a 4 -story 150 -unit senior assisted living facility on the vacant portion of the church site HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and or 2. Fax your views to the attention of the Planning Dept. @ 9521826 -0389 3. E -mail your views to jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us 4. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (952) 826 -0369 DATE OF NOTICE: January 15, 2010 COLONIAL 611- - - - - - -- ' r- +--- I.-- +- -a -- �� iii •,.-3" Q I � .1 t !J /r rte; . ... _ ,,r :.. •�, 1 r I, m ice ESrD eutowc & u. ucv moo D fl — Ih; ".1� Cpl •' [LEY. e! . •� •-. CEl � r •� . Y viV ._.-- I LEGEND � ZONING REQUIREMENTS GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT -. . Li i PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SITE LA —� THE WATERS SENIOR UVING T H E WA T E R S OF EDINA ,j v 'p nn-m_x AS IT NI(IN LIYIN [:' .•........r.•-.r•. w. w` --_ '_ oo. 2 WE C300 •�_ -, _• • -y—.. �. „•M, or The Colonial Ch=hor Edjm REVLSION HISTORY- THIS SHEET xw THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA T H EWA T E 5 SENIOR LIVING- Proposed Senior Housing Community on the Campus of Colonial Church Edina Planning Commission and City Council Meeting Notification Planning Commission: January 27th at 7 Pm City Council: February 16th at.7 pm at Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, -MN On December 8th we held a neighborhood meeting at Colonial Church to review our proposed senior housing development. Thank you to those neighbors who attended that meeting. Our next step is to present our senior housing proposal to the Edina Planning Commission on January 27 and then to the City Council on February 16. Both meetings are open to the public so you can attend to heax our presentation which will be similar to the one given on December 8. If you plan to attend, please look at the City of Edina website, wwzv.ci.edina.mn.us, to confirm that the times have not changed and the item is on the agendas. The Waters Senior Living and the Colonial Church of Edna are proposing to construct a senior housing building on the eastern portion of the Colonial Church campus. The senior housing is proposed to consist of 112 independent/ assisted living units, 28 memory care units and 10 care suites. The senior housing will include the following features: • A Wellness Center incorporating a warm crater therapy pool, an exercise area, a walking track, a spa, a beauty shop and a chapel. A comprehensive wellness program will operate within the Wellness Center to work with seniors on their bodies, minds and spirits. • On the first floor, in addition to the Wellness Center, there will be a bistro /library /market, a parlor, a billiards room and a living room. • On the second floor there will be a kitchen with two adjacent restaurants and two additional private dining rooms, a community room, an arts and crafts room, a game room and a parlor. • The third and fourth floors will consist primarily of housing units. • There will be a lower garage level that will have a few housing units on the western end and approximately 100 parking spaces for residents and employees. • The one -, two- and three- bedroom apartments will have full kitchens, Large closets, a screened balcony, in -unit storage, and a bump out window in the living room. The two- and three- bedroom units will have a second full bathroom. The senior housing will also feature a "Resident First" focus whereby the daily living services that the seniors need are brought to them as needed instead of requiring the seniors to move to other units. The entire facility will be licensed for assisted living and will have nurse coverage 2=4 hours per day. In addition, there will be volunteers from Colonial Church involved with the seniors. If you have any questions prior to these meetings, please e -mail me at ia�-< bsheltercom.com. We hope to see you at the meetings. Sincerely, Jay Jensen The Waters Senior Living neursprci-pers AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) s5 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Richard Hendrickson, being duly sworn on an oath, states or affirms that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the newspaper(s) known as Edina Sun - Current and has full knowledge of the facts stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualifica- tion as a qualified newspaper as provid- ed by Minn. Stal. §331A.02, §331A.07, and other applicable laws as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached was published in said newspaper(s) once each week, for one successive week(s); it was first published on Thurs- day, the 4 day of February 2010, and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and in- cluding Thursday, the ____ day of 2010; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alpha- bet from A to Z. both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: abalelyhgklmnopgrstuv:vxyz BY: G CFO Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before me on this 4 day of February , 2010. 4 �Zz Notary Public =CARLSON NMY 14 C ity of Edina iOlI cial PUDIfCaUen) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MN 55424 Ngtice. of Public Herrings THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the Edina City Hall Council Chambers. -1801 : "lest 501h Slreel, on Tuesday. February 16. 2010 at 7.00 P.M., and :+dl at said lime and place consider the tollo:ving: �grpQ�h @n_,siy _r;1u[le PIa(Lgmendment. Overall lJQvrl- oomonl Plan, P)I minq_ry_R_t rr mgnd Prgli rm y Pl,jj. Colonial Churehrlhe waters Senior Living of Edina. 6200 Colonial Way. Edina. PAN Conslrucl a 150 -unil senior as- sisted living lacdgy. Generally located north of Cross-town Highway 62 and :•rest of Tracy Avenue. All recommendations and objections will be heard al said meeting. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Debra Mangen. City Clerk ( Feb. 4, 2010) d 1 -PC 12710 -JH I In the Comtnunity, iviih the Coininunitlt For LEGAL NOTICES City of Edina Public Notice (Official Publication) (Official Publication; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Invitation to Comment on a Prop 2010 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY Telecommunications Fa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Interested persons are invited to comet PROGRAM telecommunications facility proposed tc Notice is heteby given that the City of Edina in c 0opera- Edina water lower at 5849 Ruth Drive respect to impacts on historic propertie lion with Hennepin County, pursuant to Title I of the Hous- ing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amend- fhis facility, it any. The facility will cons ed, is holding a public hearing on February 16, 2010. at tar antennas on the legs of the water l o associated equipment near the base o 7:00 p.m., in the Edina City Hall Council Chambers. 4801 ments regarding potential effects to West 50th Street, Edina. MN 55424. should be submitted by mail to Telecon The public hearing is on the housing and community de- alter, 11541 951h Avenue North. Maple velopment needs and the city's proposed use of the 2010 or by calling (763) 315.4501. Ouestion Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block or this notice may also be directed to the Grant Program planning allocation of $161,303. number. This notice is provided in accor. The City of Edina is proposing to undertake the following ulations of the Federal Communication C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart I and Appendice activities with 2010 Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starling on or about July 1, 2010. (Jan. 28 8 Feb. 4, 2010) dl ct vi ��m Rehabilitation of Private Property $55,108 Homes Within Reach — Affordable Housing $82,000 Certificate of Assumed Name Senior Community Services (HOME) $17,155 Community Action Partnership for (Official Publication) Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) 5 5,000 MINNESOTA SECRETARY O HOME Line $ 2,030 CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMEI For additional information on the priorities, proposed ac- Minnesota Statutes Chapt The tiling 01 an assumed name d tivities, level of funding and program performance, contact the City of Edina at 952 - 826.0462 or the Hennepin Coun- user with exclusive rights to that name ry Housing Department at 612 -348 -9260. quired for consumer protection in ord sumers to be able to identify the true mN This material can be provided to you in different forms on State the exact assumed name and request, such as large print, if you call 952- 826 -0465 ness is or will be conducted: (voice) or 952 -826 -0379 (TTDITTY). Metro Net Design The public hearing is being held pursuant to MS 471.59. Slate the address of the principal p 4456 Parklawn Ct Apt 206 Dated: January 27, 2009 Edina, MN 55435 List the name qnd complete street i (Feb. 4, 2010) dl -CDBG PHN sons conducting business under the abov Ethan Johnson 4456 Parklawn Ct Apt 206 City f Edina Edina, MN 55435 Y I certify that I am authorized to sign I (Official Publication) I further certify that I understand that b, CITY OF EDINA lificate, I am subject to the penalties of P 4801 WEST 50TH STREET in Minnesota Statutes Section 609.48 t EDINA, MN 55424 this certificate under oaltl. Notice of Public Hearings FILED: Jan. 13, 2010 THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the Edina is City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 West 50th Street. on (Feb, 4 & 11, 2010) d1- Metro N Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at 7:00 P.M., and will at said time and place consider the following: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Overall Devel- Certificate of Assumed Name opment Plan Preliminary Rozonina end Preliminary Pia t. Colonial /The Walors Senior Living of Edina. 6200 (Official Publication) Colonial Way, Edina, MN. Construct a 150 -unit senior as- Way, MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF sisted living facility. Generally located north of Cross -town CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED Highway 62 and west of Tracy Avenue, Minnesota Statutes Chapti All recommendations and objections will be heard at said The filing of an assumed name do user with exclusive rights lo' That name meeting. quired for consumer protection in orde BY ORDER OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION sumers to be able to identify the true owr Debra Mangan. City Clerk State the exact assumed name undo ness is or will be conducted: (Feb. 4, 2010) d1- PC12710 -JH Letitia Zilar Golf Slate the address of the principal pl; 5320 Brookvlew Ave Public Notice of Small Claims Edina, MN 55424 List the name and complete street a (Official Publication) sons conducting business under the above Small Claims Case No. 09SC439S2 LGC Enterprises, LLC COSETTA CARTAGENA 5320 Brookvlew Ave 7360 Gallagher Dr., 4203, Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55424 You are being sued by LST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I certify that I am authorized to sign it CiO BIECK MANAGEMENT INC., AGENT in the Small I further certify that I understand that by Claims Court of Milwaukee County, 901 N. 9th St., Mil- lificate, I am subject to the penalties of pE waukee, WI 53233. A hearing will be held al'8:30 a.m. on in Minnesota Statutes Section 609.48 a February 19, 2010. If you do not appear, a 1udgment may this certificate under oath. be given to the person suing you. (A copy of this claim has FILED: Jan. 13, 2010 been mailed to you at the address above). 1w Let We are attempting to collect a debt. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose. This communica- (Feb. 4 &.11, 20101 di- LetitiaL tion is from a debt collector, Dated this 201h day of January, 2010 Attorneys for Plaintiff Heuer Law Offices. S.C. How to Publish Your Assumec Rrnif R PArr%u Siafn R> v1117a0.tx, .2003 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified activity Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date t / Cr) �M i n , acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in/the Uhhit d S to ail copi s of the attached of Public Hearing and Mailing list for �r�, iCo (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon du y pr a d, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B) attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names. 20 WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day ofQ�J , � � Edina City Clerk Public Hearing Notice EDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 16 7:00 PM Location: City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street • r�CORI'ORsNt e 1888 CASE FILE: 2010 - 0001 -10a TO: Property Owners Within 1000 Feet APPLICANT: Colonial Church PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6200 Colonial Way, Edina LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina 1St Addn. REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Subdivision approval PROPJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a 4 -story 150 -unit senior assisted living facility on the vacant portion of the church site HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and or 2. Fax your views to the attention of the Planning Dept. @ 9521826 -0389 3. E -mail your views to jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us 4. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (952) 826 -0369 DATE OF NOTICE: February 6, 2010 � I r j,. • k , ="� ..J '•r +. III / //� , ' `"i - - - - Q _ N > r 3 2 tl RLV JtllO z j iii - �_`••,.✓1;r, � Y *��� 1 � l n 4, 4 ZONING REQUIREMENTS GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT: PARpNG ARIMNtY _ Io��a R• w �' . • .a . .` Y rri �t w-h[,. an w mocn w./nt r� � ^ N C4 9 9 m 1* V I +- -- PRFIIMNARY DEVEt MWr SITE LA 6 B THE WA= SENIOR IdvING _ T Ii EWA T E R S �. � OF EDWA SENIOR Cl Vtrl:' I �Se�i` OTTM Calaoni CYmel afHdw CmO >'1��_�Y". >i; �.'� r�� +.�.r,3r^. —"'�. {11f --."_{-•--. T- iATi�-..,-- ..- '^__.'^,"'�_.- `^._.__.'� -. �•r. —'�. _ —__. _.. .. .._— .._.— .._._��-- .___�.... ... ` Landmark Edina church could add senior housing I StarTribune.com Twins Twins are waking up to the 'O' -larm clock Homegirls Empty-nest decoratinj! Page 2 of 7 CHECK OUT THE STARTRIBUNE,COM/FANSHOP � / Tffnl ORDERBY4PM FOR NEXr-DAY DELIVERY. Home I Local + Metro I West Metro Landmark Edina church could add senior housing f . 7 It HGA Architects is a .0 X http://www.startiibuiie.com/locaUwest/83677312.htnil?elr--KArksUUUoDEy3LGDi... 3/3/2010 Landmark Edina church could add senior housing I StarTribune.corn Page 3 of 7 Artist rendering of the proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina. But some wonder if the city needs another residence for senior citizens. By MARY JANE SN'lETANKA, Star Tribune Last update: February 9, 2010 - 5:38 PM Featured comment X If the church is going to be a minority owner in the property, how can the project receive financial assistance from the city /government? ... read more Are religious organizations able to receive tar subsidies for construction projects? Close comment 6 comments I Sce all Hide reader comments WPPrint this story E -mail this story r Save to del.icio.us ®Share on Facebook Share on Digy, [_ ;Follow local news on Twitter More from West Metro • 1 ittle Grizzlies program is a big hit in Watertown • Hofstede's work faulted by colleagues and constituents alike • Man who 'lumped off MOA parking garage said 'not a word' to officers • A dam good fish barrier • Loyalty's rcNvards With its distinctive bell tower and gray clapboard buildings, Colonial Church of Edina looks a bit like an old New England village. Now the church with the picturesque covered bridge and lake alongside Hwy. 62 could get a new addition: a 150 -unit assisted - living complex for senior citizens. The proposed $35 million to $40 million Waters Senior Living of Edina would sit between the church and Hwy. 62, on what is now a tree - shrouded parking lot. If the city of Edina gives the project the go- ahead, construction likely would begin a year from now. The Senior Living building would open in the spring of 2012. http: / /wwNv.stai-tribune.com /local/ vest / 83677312 .htm1 ?eh= KArksUUUoDEy3 LGDi... 3/3/2010 Landmark Edina church could add senior housing StarTribune.com Page 4 of 7 "We think this will be the nicest senior living in Edina," said Jay Jensen, one of the principals of Waters Senior Living. "Edina is a gray city.... The closest competition is a building we manage, and it's full. Market studies show demand many times of what we're building." The proposal cleared its first hurdle recently when its preliminary plan won approval fiom the city's Planning Commission. The City Council will hold a hearing on the project Feb. 16. After that, it will have to go back to the commission and the council for final OKs. City planning staff support the project. But at the planning meeting, commission members and some city residents raised concerns. Neighbors were particularly worried that standstill traffic that develops on Tracy Avenue as Edina High School students drive to and from school could grow even worse. Concerns also were raised about the removal of mature trees and about whether the city really needs another development that serves senior citizens. Planning Commission member Floyd Grabiel said that some senior developments in the city are "empty." "I'm concerned about a 150 -unit development that may not go anyplace," lie said. "What can you say to assure us that this will be a successful project ?" Next page Recent West Metro stories Waconia's $6 million hockey arena on thin ice - February 9, 2010 Waconia's $6 million hockey arena on thin ice - Competition from other cities is making it tough to sell enough ice time. 1<9ore Hennepin Count), puts sheriff's request for cell - phone tracker on hold - February 9, 2010 Hennepin County nuts sheriff's request for cell -phone tracker on hold - The Hennepin Board wants more information on the cell phone tracking device before it will ask the feds to fund it. More Comment on this story I Read all 6 comments Hide reader comments Comments are subject to the sites terms of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Star Tribune. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification. Read all 6 comments I Hide reader comments http:// v lww.startribune.com /local/west/ 83677312. html ?eh= K..A.rksUUUoDEy3LGDi... 3/3/2010 Landmark Edina church could add senior housing I StarTribune.com Page 3 of 6' ®Share on t=acebook Share on DIRQ .Follow local news on Twitter More from West Metro • Little Grizzlies program is a big hit in Watertown • 1lofstede's work fciultcd by collca,ues and constituents alike • Man who jumped off MOA parking garage said 'not a word' to officers • Adam good fish bai -ier • Loyalty's rewards Jensen acknowledged that some developments for seniors are struggling, but he said they are aimed at active seniors. He said the nearest similar assisted.- living facility is the Colony at Eden Prairie, which his firm also developed. That complex is full and has a waiting list, he said. At the Eden Prairie building, three - quarters of residents moved from homes that were three miles or less away, he said. The rest had children who lived near the facility. Jensen said lie expects the same pattern to be repeated in Edina. Ted Yoch, who led a church task force that looked at how the spare land could be used, said it concluded that the best use was senior housing. The Waters group was selected fi-om 13 proposals because of its track record in Eden Prairie, he said. The church would sell six acres of land to the Waters and be a minority owner in the development. Jensen said church members would get priority on reserving apartments. Yoch said the development "would get seniors out of single- family homes and young families in. Church members want to stay in Edina, as do others. We think this would be a great thing for the community." Jensen also addressed other concerns that had been raised. He said the average age of residents at the Eden Prairie residence is 86, and very few of those residents, who are mostly women, drive, he said. Visitors most often come on weeknights and weekends, after peak driving times, Ile added. More than 330 trees would have to be removed from the site to make room for the new building, but most are scrubby trees such as box elders, Jensen said. About 18 percent of the trees that would be removed are oaks. The project's landscape plan calls for protecting mature trees near the lake and planting more than 200 larger trees and almost 600 small trees and shrubs. Evergreens would be planted between the new building and the highway, partly to mask the road noise. The four -story building would have two dining rooms, a library, a billiard room, a chapel, rooms for games and crafts, a therapy pool and a walking track. The facility would offer wellness classes and training. 'y Previous page http : / /Nvww.startribune.com/local/ west /83677312.litml ?page =2 &c =y 3/3/2010 Landmark Edina church could add senior housing I StarTribunc.com ®Share on Facebook OSharc on Digg L Follow local news on Twitl_er More from West Metro • Little Grizzlies program is a hi = hit in Watertown • Hofstedc's work faulted h y colleagues and constituents alike • Man who juriiped off MnA parking arage said 'not a word' to officers • A dam good fish barrier • Loyalty's rewards Page 3 of 6 Residents would choose their apartment and the services they need would be delivered to them, Jensen said. There would be two 14 -unit sections for people with memory problems. Jensen proposed that 30 of the 150 units be designated "affordable" for people on restricted incomes. But if that is to happen, he told the Planning Commission, the project would need city help through tax increment financing or another subsidy. While some planning commissioners bristled at that request, Jensen later said that both Minneapolis and Eden Prairie used tax increment financing to help assisted - living projects in those cities move along. In March, Jensen's development group will break ground for another assisted - living building at 38th Street and 28th Avenue in south Minneapolis. Mary Jane Smetanka • 612- 673 -7380 Previous page Recent West Metro stories Waconia's $6 million hockey arena on thin ice - February 9, 2010 Waconia's $6 million hockey arena on thin ice - Competition from other cities is making it tough to sell enough ice time. More Hennepin Countv puts sheriff's request for cell -phone tracker on hold - February 9, 2010 Hennepin County puts sheriff's request for cell -phone tracker on hold - The Hennepin Board wants more information on the cell phone tracking device before it will ask the feds to fund it. More Comment on this story Read all 6 comments Hide reader comments Comments are subject to the sites terms of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Star Tribune. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification. http: / /Nvww.startribuiie.conillocal /west /83677312.htrnl ?page =3 &c =y 3/3/2010 FEBRUARY 25, 2010 With the Community, For the Community SUBMITTED PHOTOS Jai , Feb. 18, at Kenneth s on the force. - I i< letro Public Safety ih the department, agencies locate 265 a van.. www.minniocal.com Pe'rman Shepherd served eight years alongside Edina Police Officer Kevin Rofidal KATIE MINTZ • SUN NEWSPAPERS i Edina high school students had one ques- tion for Edina Police Officer Kevin Rofidal. "Is that Kodiak or Diesel ?" they asked last �'!l week as Rofidal, one of two K -9 handlers for the Edina Police Department, left campus follow• ing a presentation. ` x "There are 51 officers and I bet they didn't know anyone's name.but they know the dogs," said Rofidal, Kodiak's handler. Kodiak, one of Edina's most recognized offi- cers, has done much for the department since: KODIAK: TO PAGE 14 SPORTS EHS girls, seeded third, will open state vs. Roseau PAGE 18 111110 2 18 9115 3 13 41 1113 Church's plan for housing gets early nod Neighbors, mayor seek downsized plans before final OK of assisted - living facility KATIE MINTZ • SUN NEWSPAPERS Residents near Colonial. Church in Edina say a proposed: 150 -unit assisted living facility on its property won't fit the largely single - family neighbor- hood. But church leaders say the four -story building slated along Highway 62 will serve a grow- ing segment of the population - senior citizens. The Edina City Council gave preliminary approval Tuesday, Feb. 16, to The Waters Senior Living of Edina. "We know that we're an aging community and housing choices are very important," said Mayor Jim Hovland, but he warned the developer to take heed of residents' concerns. "Don't think I won't vote against it on a final basis," said Hovland, who wanted to see the facility's height reduced. "This is a neighborhood and you're not the only building in the neighborhood." i SENIOR HOUSING: TO PAGE 12 WINDFALL $6,500 TAX CREDIT Saturday, February 27 at 11:00 am FOR EXISTING HOMEOWNERS WHO or Saturday, March 6 at 1:00 pm _ PURCHASE BEFORE APRIL 30! P..M J oin us for a Free Seminar and learn how to take advantage of this tax saving opportunityf _ 12 Edina Sun - Current . Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010 - www.minniocal.com In the Contmunin, 141ith lice Community For the Cornmu. Senior housing FROM PAGE 1 The council approved 4 -1, Councilmember Joni Bennett dissenting, a comprehensive guild plan change and preliminary rezoning and building plans allowing the project to move forward. Final plans are expected to return to the Planning Commission and City Council this spring, said City Planner Cary Teague. Colonial Church will sell six acres to development group The Waters Senior Living at a discounted rate in exchange for minority ownership and housing pri- ority in the complex. The developer was selected from 13 for its positive partner- ship with Normandale Lutheran Church at the Colony of Eden Prairie assisted living center. Following the meeting, Jay Jensen, a principal with The Waters, said his team would consider redesigning a portion of the building and adding more landscap- ing to mitigate neighbors' concerns. "We're going to explore everything," said Jensen. He said, however, reducing the height would be off the table. The $40 million building with 112 apartments, 28 memory -care units, 10 full-care suites and 20,000 square feet of common space requires a certain econo- my of scale to be cost - effective, he said. With a high ratio of staff to residents, 24 -hour nursing and spacious common areas including a chapel, multiple din- ing rooms, game room, library, therapy pool, walking path and exercise room, four stories are necessary, he said. "We really believe that this will be the finest senior living community in Edina," said Jensen. Proposed at nearly the length of two football fields and about 50 feet tall, neighbors said The Waters would impact their views and damage the char- acter of their neighborhood. "To me, Edina is a residential communi- ty," said Bill Rodgers, one of several nearby residents who spoke at the meeting. "Scale it down a little bit so it fits the neighbor- hood. It's too big. It's way too big." The project required a comprehen- sive guild plan change for the six -acre WEEKLY. ------------ ------ CARD MART ICards half price... always! i Assorted Lunch /Beverage 1 Napkins t 33� pk t t i *With purchase of an y two greeting cards. t t Umit three packs per customers, r Expires 2 -28-10 f --------------------- Nomundale Village 5123 W 99th St Bloomington, MN 55437 9S2- 881 -4597 plot from quasi - public to high -den: residential, as well as rezoning froi single - dwelling residential district planned residential district. Teague said the project would n all size, parking and setback requ ments with the zoning change. He sai would fit into the neighborhood anc buffered to the south by Highway 62 the west by a townhouse complex, to north by the church and to the east Countryside Park and Fire Station Nt City staff and the Planning Commiss recommended approval of the projec "I think it snakes sense," s Councilmember Scot Housh, who wa: favor of the project. "Tokens, just 1 SENIOR HOUSING: TO NEXT P All NATURAL SUPERIOR CARPET AND UPHOLSTERY CLEANING ZO % OFF ALL SERVICES hem,�ry� 952-233-2211 lf"R)" ' V2 CFF Affw Larae 2 (tern pizza (Limit 1 par c Stomer) IUMADWAY PIZZA 612.SC�1.31tC2 NOW OPEN Full Service Repair 5l-70p 952 - 888 -5100 coupon any Mayor ; x,$25 o repair ittSer Ice ust be of X250 i IReP vralu of hi9he1191 r i CPN. �2 �g112010 -i',y�� ` wet etcpifes -- - - - -.. �.. 22 W. 82nd St. - Bloomin% 'AIN - www.aulorepairmpls.a 0 N 0 L l ym www.minniocal.com— Thursday, Feb. 25,2010 —Edir ;urrent 13 In the Community, With the Community, For the Community FROM PREVIOUS PAGE families, just like businesses, are always changing, always evolving." A few council members added condi- tions for their approval including that the memory care wing on east end of the building be made more visually appeal- ing, and that additional landscaping be added along with sidewalks and a trail easement. Bennett, who initially voted in favor of the comprehensive guild plan change, asked for a reconsideration of the vote saying the community had not been ade- quately involved in the planning. Ted Yoch, chair the church's develop- ment committee, said 15 nearby residents did attend an input session at Colonial about three months ago. He said the devel- opment should come as no surprise. Since the church was first built 31 years ago, that portion of its 20 -plus acre compound was scheduled for develop- ment. Past ideas included a seminary and retreat center, but Yoch said senior ------------- - - - - -- P $10c, -OFF i ANY � e f t t .y t I a onS`Tap HAMRUR ff s i 7 w.x, •F/ -bu xrrr' (wl.h Is coupon t t A—e VA -y HAMBUALFAS s— d bn a.er SO year: t • R-ed - U. bet hd -b.1- er r n nwu: Y (.apc- t -mwI "—"die T""_we.. t rd -one ofd.• S00 bert ravel ,etau,one n U,e l2 SA i u.n:e 1 raupa.. p.r oa. 1 t Nor vend .,I.n .nr «n.. arts.. vlr... ,.,....nr <a..pan wnan a.earins. 1 t OINE•IN ONLY. 1 t Expires 3125110. g t t •Cold Beer - Opan Sw.n Da-ys y' A Weak 1 1 Hours: Mondoy- SLoday 11 i.-, 10 � W at pm. n 1 B n :nn coma lwmm�vm, yw lNa c. i c 7F d. Fl;r.l o c 0mu • FUan araN t ' ;: nr- c�nie+ n' Frary Ck,uU 0rrn S C4 l ul F+ "q 952- 914-5299 w Jlonstap. =om -- ..------ - - - - -- housing fits the bill now. "We wanted to benefit the community. We wanted seniors to stay in Edina," said Yoch- "We think there's a real need." Edina has the oldest population in the metro area. According to the 2000 Census, nearly 23 percent of Edina's res- idents are over 65 and many of them still live in single - family homes. "The Waters in Edina is the kind of place where I'd like to see my parents live," said Jennifer Myers, president of the Colonial Church Council. Through its partnership, church members will volunteer at The Waters. "My kids and other Colonial kids would have the opportunity to see their grandparents and give back to the com- munity," said Myers. The city will also consider a public funding component to secure affordable housing units when it reviews final plans this spring. Jensen said if final plans are approved construction would likely begin in spring 2011 and take one year to complete. Affloullm Town Your Guide to Dinin and Entertainment (7,:ft fvee 1 t Bey one Brunch gm ?t one - R'EE $18.9:? ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT Student solo recitals Student solo recitals sponsored by Edina Community Education are 7:30 p.m. Thursday, March 4, and Friday, March 5, at South View Middle School in the Ken Dragseth Auditorium, 4725 South View Lane, Edina. The fee recital followed by refreshments features honors students of Sam Bergman, Mary Kirchner, Patricia Kreuziger, Carolyn Long, Diane Loudon, Lucinda Marvin, Ann Perry Slosser and Kathleen VanDoeren. Bird exhibit opens "The Bird Show - An Exhibition Celebrating Birds" will run April 1 -29 at the Edina Art Center, 4701 W. 64th St. An open- ing reception will be held 5-8 p.m., provid- ing an opportunity to meet the artists. Information: wwwedinaartcentercom. Save REAL BIG with YMCA Membership. Pay ONLY $50 Joining Fee to get started. Plus, get a YMCA Member Perks Coupon Book with BIG SAVINGS on programs and classes when you join by February 28. 1%9 Open Mcuse Weekend BO' 40' 0' 80' U ra F- 0 Little League Field Q� Prep Field Basketball Court (Full) 1 Tennis Courts (2) Hockey (Zink 9) Childrens Play Area Natural Play Area (using cut from sledding hill) 9' Park Shelter Gf Parking Lot Paved Trail OV Park benches +j Adventure Skate Loop ©® September 2008 ©® f'',' �w st It • A4. Ari L Olf Ij wrl Count wvvw.ed-inacountrys.ide.com 952.929.1477 r pww�wl 04 4A i w %. RECEIVED � I1 �r 0 f� JUN 11 2010 � EDINA CITY COUNCIL EDINA PLANNING BOARD MAYOR OF EDINA REGUARDING COLONIAL CHURCH DEVELOPMENT DEAR LADIES AND GENTLEMEN; AS A RESIDENT OF EDINA SINCE 1948 AND READY TO RETIRE IT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE A PLACE TO MOVE INTO TO BE ABLE TO LIVE HERE TILL MY DEATH. I BELIEVE COLONIAL CHURCH IS PROPOSING SUCH AN INSTITUTION. I QUESTION THE SHORT SITEDNESS OF THOSE OPPOSED TO THIS DEVELOPMENT, FOR THEY TO MAY BE LOOKING FOR SUCH A DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE. THE PROPOSED SITE SEEMS LIKE AN IDEAL LOCATATION FOR SUCH A DEVELOPMENT. IT IS LOCATED NEAR CHURCHES,FAMILY HOMES, SHOPPING, PARKS, FIRE AND MEDICAL SERVICE AND GOOD FREEWAY ACCESS. ITS LOCATION IS JUST WHERE THE COMMUNITY NEEDS SUCH A DEVELOPMENT. I AM A LITTLE DISAPOINTED IN COLONIALS AGREEING TO REDUCE THE SIZE AS IT WILL MEAN A REDUCTION IN AVAILABLE SERVICES, DUE TO A SMALLER NUMBER OF UNITS TO SPREAD THE COST TO, THIS ALSO MEANS HIGHER COSTS TO EACH UNIT REMAINING. DOES THIS HELP ITS ABILITY TO BE SUCCESSFUL? IT WOULD BE NICE TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO LIVE IN EDINA RATHER THAN FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE. PLEASE CONSIDER THESE THOUGHTS WHEN MAKING YOUR DECISIONS! DONALD E HALLA 6601 MOHAWK TRAIL EDINA, MN. 55439 -1029 612 - 282 -6672 Bill & Barbara Beard 4606 Sunnyside Road RECEIVED Edina, MN 55424 JUN 17 2010 June 14, 2010 Mayor Jim Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: The Waters Senior Living of Edina Dear Mayor Hovland: I just wanted to drop you a brief note to ask you for your support for the Waters Senior Living of Edina project. As former members of Colonial Church, we participated in the early stages of the process, 3 years ago, that Colonial engaged in to determine how best to utilize this wonderful site. We have watched this process from afar, these past years, and have been very impressed with how Colonial approached this project by first engaging the community, building around their ideas and then seeking out community feedback both for and against the project. We have had the opportunity to review the "Resubmission Packet" that will be before you shortly and find it to be a wonderful project that is better for having ground through the community engagement process. Although we all know that this project isn't without controversy, and suspect that there are those who still take issue with the project, we believe this project will be a great addition to the community, a project that is consistent with and reflects the values of Edina, meets significant community needs, is consistent with Edina's Comp Plan and produces the lowest neighborhood impact of any possible project. We respectfully request your support for this wonderful project. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. Regards, i & Barbara Beard billb as b eardgroupinc. com (952) 457.3405 Mobile RECEIVED Betty D. Murphy 6543 McCauley Trail JUN 17 2010 Edina, Minnesota 55439 Dear Edina City Council members, I write to endorse the approval of the Waters Senior Living proposal that will soon come before the Council. As a sixty year resident of Edina and a senior of some 85 years (would you believe it ?), I consider such a development a very worthy part of Edina's future. My support is based on rationale for the good of Edina and for the good of seniors such as me. I understand that the building is carefully designed to enhance the local neighborhood. The building is only three stories tall and 139 units. (I hope I will be able to retain a space). The design includes attractive architectural features that will make the residents proud to live there and enhance the community. Edina needs more senior housing. I hope to spend my "autumn years" in the wonderful city my late husband (Harry) and I lived and raised our three children in for so many years. Our family loves our town; in fact two of my three grown children still live in Edina. They have also expressed their support for the development. How wonderful it would be for my children, grandchildren and great grandchildren to visit me in The Waters near where I have lived for so many years. When the day comes that I will move from my current individual home to senior housing, my home will become an affordable option for a younger family or adult in housing transition as I was some nine years ago. A wide spectrum of housing options is good for the city. While I am not a member of Colonial Church, I know that the church has been a wonderful part of the local neighborhood for many years and an attractive addition to the Countryside community. I am confident that this extension of the Colonial village will be just as positive an addition to the area. Let me close by saying that as an 85 year old resident of Edina, I have been concerned these past few years about where I will spend my later years. Many of my friends and I discuss our plans (or lack of them) often. The Waters is where I hope to be. My friends have told me they feel the same way. I hope the Council approves The Waters plan. Thank you. Sincerely, Betty D. Murphy Mayor Jim Hovland Edina, Minnesota Dear Sir, RECEIVED JUN 17 2010 I am writing in support of the Waters Senior Living of Edina Project. As a member of Colonial Church, I have been following the developments and sincerely believe that this project will be an asset to the city. It is a well designed plan, and has taken into consideration many of the suggestions of the neighbors. The plan has the senior housing reduced from four stories to three stories, and the number of units has been reduced from 150 units to 139 units. Also the front of the building has been redesigned to include more architectural features. This project will meet the increased demand of the community for more housing for seniors. I've been told that more than 10,000 Edina residents are older than age 65. A large number of them will eventually need assisted living and memory care. Also, having experienced the devastating effects of memory loss in my father, and our efforts to find good housing for him, we are hopeful that when we might need senior housing, the Waters Senior Living of Edina Project will be available for us. When that time comes, we would hope to be able to live near our family and the Colonial Church community. Due to the existing large trees and vegetation, the view of this building will be partially blocked in a lovely way. The trees will provide a green buffer to the senior housing. For most of the year, the building will scarcely be seen through the trees. I cannot imagine a building complex like this being built anywhere else that could be nestled into the land in such a natural way. These are just a few of the reasons why I support the Waters Senior Housing of Edina. Sincerely, Penelope Anderson �'� Susan Howl - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Nancy Grubb Lopez [mailto:lopezgrubb @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:54 PM RECEIVED To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Revised Living Waters Application JUN 17 2010 Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Gordon Hughes, City Manager Along with my neighbors, I appreciate the efforts to make changes to the Living Waters project based on the comments received from residents of Countryside Neighborhood. Unfortunately my neighbors and I remain dissatisfied with the final rezoning and development plans for this project. The criteria that contributed to our choice of the Countryside neighborhood is threatened by such a structure. Having moved to Edina from a Minneapolis home neighboring an assisted living facility, my family is very familiar with the impact such a development has on its community. Not only would the park, playground and surrounding natural habitats be compromised, but the increased 24 -hour traffic necessary for a facility of this magnitude to operate is unimaginable in our quiet residential neighborhood. I simply can't fathom the proposed structure coexisting with the neighborhood we chose to raise our families. I ask Shelter Corporation to once again revisit the size & scope of the project and ask themselves if indeed it is aligned with President, CEO and founder Lynn Carlson Schell's words quoted from the September 2008 issue of MN Business, "I want to create something where there is a need or a void." Thank you, Nancy Lopez 1 Susan Howl Importance: High From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto :barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:17 AM To: Gordon Hughes; Lynette Biunno Cc: Cary Teague Subject: RE: The Waters - Posting of Addl Two Signs on June 15, 2010, Made the Decision, for what purpose, and why now? Importance: High Please pass on this email to all the City Leaders listed below. Gordon Hughes, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Gabriel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder RECEIVED JUN 17 2010 Two Weeks Before Planning Commission, Who This is a follow -up to my email exchange of March 8, 2010 with Gordon Hughes where I requested the posting of two additional signs that appeared to be required by the ordinance. I also made the requests of the Mayor, Council Members, and four of the Planning Commissioners when you all came to the proposed site in March 2010 I am respectfully requesting the input of the City Leadership to help me understand and to get answer to the following three questions, as well as other questions throughout my email. I have provided the background below for your convenience. 1. Who made the decision to post these additional two signs at this time? 2. For what purpose? 3. Why now? On June 15, 2010, two weeks before the June 30th Planning Commission Meeting, where Colonial Church and Shelter Corp are to present their final development application of a $44 million project requiring a zoning change from R -1 residential to PRD -5 convalescent nursing care, where the building is zoned for convalescent and being built for an upscale senior massive apartment complex, zoned as PRD -5 because it couldn't qualify as PSR like all the other assisted living senior places in Edina, creating a commercial zoning precedent, bringing in a for profit organization, and requesting a subdivision, and amending the Comprehensive Plan to include an area of change that was never outlined as such, all taking place in a solely residential area. I see 3 % months later, that the two additional Rezoning and Subdivision signs are now posted, giving resident two weeks to take notice. I see the original sign at the proposed site on Colonial Way is still posted. I am sure you would all agree that these are very, very big variances being requested, and it would be more important than ever to give notice to the residents impacted so they could learn more and weigh in. To provide this additional signage two weeks before the final meeting for a project of this size is very confusing and unsettling, especially when it should have been done in January 2010. And there was a chance to make it right 3 '/z months ago and the request vas denied. And again some 2 months ago, the requests were denied. These are the same two signs that I brought to your attention 3'/z months ago. At that time I respectfully shared that it appeared that ordinances had been violated and these signs were required at these two additional locations. And since proper notice was not provided, I had pointed out that the decision made by the Council on Feb 16, 2010 to preliminarily approve the Colonial /Shelter application appeared would not be valid, and asked you to check with the City Council to invalidate their decision. Gordon Hughes had sent me a thoughtful, detailed email below with all the notices attached (of which I attached for your reference again) and Gordon indicated that "the City Code specifically provides that deficiencies related to the sign requirement do not invalidate the City's actions. That seems to be the situation in this instance ". Then who made the decision, for what purpose, and why now? I again raised the sign issue again to Gordon Hughes on March 22, 2010 per the email trail below after the Mayor, City Council Members, and to the four Planning Commissioners that came out to the proposed site in March to visit with out concerned neighbors. There appeared to be an understanding of the neighbors concerns expressed by this city leadership when we shared the fact that very few people go down Colonial Way, but the major traffic takes place on HW62, Olinger Blvd, and Tracy. And we expressed our concerns about the spirit of the ordinance, as it appears the spirit was not being met.. I never received a response back from you, and no additional signs were ever posted as requested. No follow -up was provided by any other city leadership to me or anyone else. We requested Colonial Church and Shelter Corp to post the signs again on April 6th and April 8th, 2010 when nearly 200 neighbors attended the meetings with the Church and Developer. The neighbors asked them to be in the spirit of the ordinance and also to be in the spirit of good neighbors, to please post the required signs. We did not hear back from Colonial or Shelter so our attorney, Dan Rasmus reached out to Colonial Church and Shelter Corp and on April 12, 2010 Gary Anderson indicated they would not be posting any additional signs. The email correspondence on this request is listed below in the email trails. ° I would like to know who made the decision to post these two large additional signs, and why now? As a result of all these communications and positions that have been taken by city leadership, I am sure you can understand how confusing and unsettling this process would appear to residents. Please help me understand, what is it that the City, Church, and Developer trying to accomplish by posting these signs at this point? Was it determined that all three of these signs should have been posted in January 2010 before the January 27, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting where preliminary approval was provided to Colonial Church and Shelter Corp after all? If so, what does that mean as to the decisions that were made at those meetings? Or was it done as some people have asked for legal protection purposes and leverage? Going forward, I have a lot of questions around this and other city processes as it seems they should be clearer and not this difficult. We need to get more involved in more up to date best practices that will deliver better outcomes for all stakeholders. I am very concerned about the confusion of the ordinance/ law, the facts, the spirit of the ordinances, the interpretation, and who gets to interpret, the process itself, and intent. It appears that this is not working as it should for all. Who really benefits from this process? What process are residents, developers and the city able to rely on? What does the ordinance really mean? Is this a fair process for all? How can it be changed to be fair to all? How can we make this process more straightforward and transparent to residents and all stakeholders? I thank you all for the hard work you do as I know it must be challenging when trying to keep the rights of all the residents in balance, coupled with keeping development alive and vibrant, and planning for the changing needs of our community. We have a wonderful city and there are a lot of very good things. However, through this process, I have observed there are some things that can be better for everyone. Understanding that we must act within the law and ordinance, but understandably so, there is always a lot of regulatory discretion that is used by our City Leaders because everything is not black and white and we are human. I hope we can first fix any mistakes that were made under this process as evidence supports, and make it right. Then take these lessons learned forward to change some policies and processes to make changes that will be fairer to all, and far less time consuming! If I can help in any way to assist in making improvements, please let me know what forum or vehicles I should participate in. Thanks you for your prompt response. Sincerely, Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place RECEIVED JUN 17 2010 Susan Howl To the Honorable Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: I want to write to express my personal disappointment in your behavior toward the 25 residents of the Countryside neighborhood that took the time to come to last Tuesday's Council Meeting. As a resident of the neighborhood, I can tell you that many of us have struggled with what we feel has been an unfair process from the beginning regarding the for - profit commercial development being proposed by Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation. You have insisted on keeping the communication on this issue "fair," but what is fair about the influence and communication of Shelter Corporation with you and other city officials over the past few years. Residents are getting a late start and fighting, what appears to me, a group that has already made up its mind long ago. Residents have also attempted to have other meetings to understand the "process," but you have refused to meet with them. You have stated that you need a reason to NOT vote for the proposal, but shouldn't you have valid reasons TO vote for it that represent ALL constituencies and stakeholders - including, especially including, the neighborhood? The residents who attended this past Tuesday were simply there to gain a better understanding of what the decision process is (what the rules are) so that they can effectively present their views to the Planning Commission and the Council. It was NOT their intent to do a "serial" whatever it was that you said were concerned about, but rather simply to better understand. I personally felt that you dismissed, and insulted, the entire group by your jumping to conclusions and dismissing their right to ask questions they were told by city officials they had the right to ask, and should ask. What amazes me from attending this meeting, is that the city has a nine step process to determine whether a stop sign should go in a neighborhood, but when the Council was asked to help residents understand the purpose of a comprehensive plan, and the process for making a decision to ignore it, and ignore zoning for that matter, you burst into flames and said it's just a "big picture" guide. Then what ARE the rules? Are they secret? Does a $40 million project that will alter the personality of a neighborhood deserve as much of a thoughtful public process as a stop sign? While I now at least know how you approach that issue, I don't have a clue on how you will consider this mega - project. That is unacceptable, and you should apologize to the residents who spent time to put together thoughtful, acceptable, appropriate questions which you simply assumed was an agenda, and dismissed. Your action was an inappropriate abuse of power and leadership, and intimidated the group at the time. You owe these residents, and the citizens of Edina, a clear, stated process by which important decisions that impact thousands of families and millions of dollars of their personal investment will be made - other than your secret interpretation of the "big picture." If you would like to discuss this further, I can be reached at 952.920.2626. Sincerely, John Harden, 5829 Jeff Place Susan Howl Subject: FW: New Colonial Church signs RECEIVED JUN 17 1010 From: Kent Gravelle [ mailto :kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:32 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Cary Teague Subject: New Colonial Church signs Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council, I have noticed the new Colonial Church / Living Waters signs on Olinger and on Hwy 62. Because they were installed several months after Barbara Hoganson publicly requested them from both the City and the Church and only two weeks before the final planning commission hearing on the subject, it is my concern that the City Council has already decided to approve the project and, with the advice of the City Attorney, installed the signs to minimize any possible future legal arguments. I hope I am entirely wrong and that that is not the case. Sincerely, Kent B. Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Zoning signs From: pegdodge @comcast.net [mailto:pegdodge @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Zoning signs RECEIVED JUN 17 1010 To the Hon. Mayor Hoglund, City Council Members and City Planning Committee Members: I saw the re- zoning sign for the Colonial Church property yesterday on my way to golf. I am a member of Colonial Church and was at the church at least twice a week from September of 2009 through April of 2010 and I never saw a re- zoning sign until I became aware of the extent of the proposed project through the "Save Edina Countryside" effort. I have lived at 6117 Sherman Circle for 31 years. I have attended Colonial Church for most of that time. I am mystified about the purpose of re- zoning signs. Aren't they to be placed in a manner as to inform the affected tax payers and residents? If not, what is their purpose? If I never saw the re- zoning sign in the back parking lot of the church that I attend, how could anyone in the neighborhood have been duly informed? I will be attending tonight's meeting and hope that this issue might be addressed. I believe that the obscure location of the original sign did not serve it's purpose and now our neighborhood is in jeopardy of becoming a re- zoning precedent that most of Edina would be against. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Peggy Dodge Edina Resident Susan Howl Subject: FW: The Waters Notification - Why Now RECEIVED JUN 16 2010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: MCCOY, KEVIN C (ATTOPS) [mailto:km2958@att.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:05 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: The Waters Notification - Why Now Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I would like to be informed of the following questions... 1 - Who made the decision to erect the Rezoning and Subdivision Notification Sign posted today at Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd? 2 - Why was this posted at this time? These two questions are raised as there appears to be a continuation of an organized means of limiting communications with the public while maintaining the finer line of legal responsibility. On March 8, residents of Edina requested current City Manager, Gordon Hughes, to post this sign for public awareness. Following a meeting on April 8 with Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation residents again asked for public notification to be posted at a more visible location adjacent to the property. It is very interesting to see how this notification is now erected two weeks ahead of the Planning Council Meeting where this will be discussed. I really hope our City Leadership and their Planning Commission appointments really assess this massive oversized commercial development in the heart of Edina's village. I ask you all to reject this Development as proposed given the revised size simply does not fit into the neighborhood as our Comprehensive Plan is designed to protect. Kevin McCoy 5809 Jeff Place 1 To: Edina City Council RECEIVED June 17, 2010 Honorable James B Hovland JUN 16 2010 Ms. Joni Bennett Ms. Mary Brindle Ms. Ann Swenson Mr. Scot Housh After the Edina City Council meeting of February 26th the Save Countryside Neighborhood group was asked by council members to negotiate with Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church to downsize their proposed project to conform to the residential character of the Countryside neighborhood. Following several delays, Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church agreed to meet, on their terms, at the church to listen, for apparently the first time, to neighborhood concerns. There were two meetings with a turnout of over 250 neighbors voicing concerns about the impact on the Countryside neighborhood and the park as well as the precedent- setting consequences for all of Edina in rezoning, seemingly at will, for a developer's convenience. There was no negotiating. Apparently Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation representatives were confident that they already had the approval of the City of Edina to proceed as planned. As of February, they had been 50% approved. In a matter of weeks, the city had changed the zoning from residential to RSD -5 and altered the comprehensive plan to accommodate a commercial for - profit business in a residential neighborhood. A zoning classification was being "stretched" to allow month to month senior rental apartments to be zoned as if they were exclusively for nursing patients thus requiring fewer parking spaces than would be needed for adults who drive. The concern- sharing meetings ended with a promise from Shelter Corporation to get back to the Save Countryside Neighborhood group with revisions based on what the church and developer heard. Several weeks later the groups met again but this time, with the stipulation from Colonial and Shelter Corp that only the neighborhood steering committee be present. The developer and church representatives presented a take it or leave it plan that Save Countryside Neighborhood steering committee members were told should be looked at as a "victory". Committee members were told that the changes that were made increased the cost of the project and reduced its profitability. The new plan did not change the impact of this apartment complex on Countryside. In fact, in some ways the impact was increased. The revised building is apparently shorter and will house slightly less persons. It is now proposed to be 3 and 4 stories with 139 units. That is a slight reduction of 11 units from the original proposal. To reduce the height, the foot print of the building has been increased by adding extensions /bump outs to the side of the building facing Countryside Park. The mass of the roof has also been increased. The total square footage is now to be 200,387 sq ft. The size and mass of the building was not significantly reduced. It does not fit the neighborhood. Most significantly, it sets a precedent for other for - profit commercial projects to be approved to be built in residential neighborhoods in Edina. I need to stress that there were no "negotiations." The Countryside group had nothing to negotiate with except citizen anguish. The City of Edina bears responsibility for that for approving the church and developer's plan, making zoning changes, changing the comprehensive plan in such a whirlwind way and, in paying so little attention to the neighborhood residents' valid concerns. I am asking that the City Council disapprove the Waters Senior Living project at this time. If Colonial Church and the Shelter Corporation or some other partner wishes to proceed with developing the property, please involve the neighborhood in ensuring that the size and scope of such a project fits the character and residential nature of the Countryside Neighborhood. This is not an unreasonable request based on the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. Sincerely, William Rodgers, Jr. 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 - 927 -9421 From: Gordon Hughes [mailto:GHughes ci.edina.mn.us] RECEIVED Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 4:06 PM To: barbarahoganson @comcast.net JUN 16 2010 Cc: Cary Teague Subject: The Waters As a follow up to our conversation last Tuesday, I've had a chance to review your concerns about the approval process for The Waters. You noted that the proposed project did not comply with the public notice requirements of the zoning ordinance and, therefore, the preliminary approvals granted by the Planning Commission and the City Council should be rescinded pending new hearings. You specifically referenced the failure to post "Proposed Zoning and Subdivision Signs" at required locations in advance of the City's consideration of the proposal. You also mentioned that the City acted hastily on the project given the holidays etc. First, a word about the consideration process. This type of rezoning is a two step process in Edina. The applicant first submits preliminary plans which are considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Public hearings are a component of this consideration. If the preliminary plans are approved, the applicant then prepares "final development plans which include detailed drawings concerning the exact location and height of buildings, building materials, landscaping, utilities and so forth. Public hearings are again held at the Commission and Council level prior to their consideration of the final development plans. If they are approved, then, and only then, is the property rezoned. The Waters has completed the preliminary phase of the approval process, but not the final phase. If and when final development plans are submitted, another application is made and another round of hearings is conducted. Until then, the property remains in its current zoning classification. The application also included a request to subdivide the church property so as to provide a lot for The Waters and a lot for the church. As with the rezoning, preliminary approval has been granted - final consideration tracks with final development plan consideration. As to the speed of the City's consideration, we are always under a time crunch as a result of requirements of State law. Under the law, cities are required to act on rezoning applications within 120 days of receiving a complete application. If not acted on, the law prescribes that the application is deemed approved. While 120 days seems generous, it often proves to be very short. After the application is submitted, we must complete our staff review and analysis, the Transportation Commission (meets monthly) must review, a public hearing must be scheduled for the Planning Commission (meets monthly) and a public hearing scheduled for the Council. Sometimes a matter is held over by the commissions or Council which can prove troublesome from the standpoint of the State law mandate. As to the signage requirement, the City Code states: B. Sign. The petitioner for rezoning shall erect, or cause to be erected, at least one sign per street frontage on the land described in the petition. [Emphasis added] The sign or signs shall be of a design approved by the Planner, shall be 36 inches by 60 inches in size, shall have letters at least four inches high using Helvetica medium typeface or other letter style approved by the Planner, shall be constructed of sturdy material, shall be neatly lettered, and shall be easily viewable from, and readable by persons on, the adjoining street. The sign or signs shall contain the following information: "This property proposed for rezoning by: (Name of Petitioner or Applicant) (Telephone of Petitioner or Applicant) For information contact Edina Planning Department: Telephone No. 927 - 8861" The petition shall not be deemed filed and the Commission shall not be required to hold any hearings on the petition until the sign has been erected as required and for at least ten days preceding the hearing. The sign shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in place until a final decision on the petition has been made by the Council, and shall be removed by the petitioner within five days after the final decision. The failure of any petitioner to comply fully with the provisions of this paragraph relating to the sign shall not prevent the Commission and Council from acting on the petition nor invalidate any rezoning granted by the Council. [Emphasis added] If the signs are not kept in good repair or removed as required, then the signs shall be deemed a nuisance and may be abated by the City by proceedings under M.S. 429, or any other then applicable provisions of this Code or State Law, and the cost of abatement, including administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, may be levied as a special assessment against the property upon which the sign is located. Similar signage requirements are also contained in the Subdivision Ordinance. In my review of the "petition" (i.e. the rezoning application) and the subdivision application, the applicant describes the "land" as just that portion of the church property that will be occupied by The Waters project. A strict reading of the City Code would require the posting of the sign only on the street frontages adjoining the "land Therefore, it would seem to me that signs would be required on Colonial Way and, arguably, on the Crosstown Highway. (Although this highway doesn't intuitively seem to be a "street" in this context, I believe it does meet the zoning ordinance's definition of street.) In the case of The Waters, a sign was posted only on Colonial Way. A sign arguably should have been posted on the Crosstown Highway and was not. While a sign on Olinger would have been more helpful and informative to the adjoining neighborhood, it does not appear to be required, in my opinion. The obvious question then is, if a sign was required on the Crosstown, can the City rescind its preliminary approval and rehear the matter? After consulting with the City Attorney, I believe the answer is no. The City Code specifically provides that deficiencies related to the sign requirement do not invalidate the City's actions. That seems to be the situation in this instance. As noted above, in retrospect, I believe a sign on Olinger would have been very helpful and informative. I would note though that the signage situation should be viewed in the context of the overall public information process relative to rezonings. According to State law, the only notice required for a rezoning is 1) an ad in the "legals" section of the newspaper and 2) mailed notice to property owners within 350 feet of the property ten days prior to the Council hearing. (Only one hearing is required before the Council rezones a property per State law.) The City of Edina does the following: • Public hearings are held at both the Planning Commission and Council level. • With this type of project, a minimum of four hearings are held prior to rezoning (two before each body) • Mailed notice is sent to owners within 1,000 feet. • Developers are encouraged to hold a neighborhood meeting in advance of making application. Such a meeting was held in this case and owners within 1,000 were invited to this. • Planning Commission and Council hearings are televised on Channel 16 and "webstreamed" on the City's website. • Descriptions of proposed projects are provided on the City's website prior to the Planning Commission hearing. • Planning Commission agendas are e- mailed via "City Extra" to residents who have asked to be included on this list serve. (664 residents are currently signed up for this.) In addition to these routine activities, the Minneapolis Star Tribune featured this proposed project in their February 10, 2010, edition, approximately one week before the Council hearing. This story accurately described the proposal and announced the that a Council hearing would be held on February 16. Attached are copies of the relevant notices, mailing area, articles etc as well as a timeline of activities. While I don't believe the Council is in a position to rescind its prior action, I would like to emphasize that this project is at the halfway point in the approval process. There are more hearings yet to happen and the property is not rezoned until final plans are approved. I would encourage your participation. Gordon L. Hughes City Manager City of Edina 952- 826 -0401 FAX 952- 826 -0390 www.CityofEdina.com • Susan Howl Subject: FW: Rezoning and Subdivision sign - Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd RECEIVED JUN 16 1010 From: Christine Henninger [mailto: Christine. Hen ninger @genmills.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 5:57 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Christine Henninger Subject: Rezoning and Subdivision sign - Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council Members and Planning Commission Members, I have attached below the image of a sign that was posted today at the intersection of Colonial Way and Olinger Blvd announcing a Rezoning and Subdivision in this area. Imagine my surprise upon seeing this sign now, less than two weeks before the planning commission meeting at which this project will be voted upon, when as a resident of this neighborhood we have been asking for such a sign for more than two months, in order to notify area residents of the impending project. We sent the request to Gordon Hughes March 1, and received a note back March 8 (attached below), in essence saying that no further signs would be posted. We again asked for the signs to be posted after the Colonial Church neighborhood meetings on April 6 and April 8, and the Colonial Church leadership stated that they would not be posting additional signs. I would really like an explanation as to why, when we requested this sign be erected back in March and again in April, we were denied by both the City Manager and the Colonial Church leadership, and now, with less than two weeks to go, the sign mysteriously appears. I have been working diligently with other like- minded neighbors to get the word out to our fellow Edina residents about "his proposed project, and as part of that effort requested that additional signs be erected so that more residents would be aware of .he project and have the opportunity to be informed. After all, isn't a city best served when its constituents are well - informed about potential changes that will impact their neighborhoods, and can provide feedback to their appointed and elected officials regarding such changes in reasonable timeframes, particularly when you are talking about a $44 million project, making a zoning change from residential to commercial, changing the Edina Comprehensive Plan, and creating a subdivision. These are very big deals, and impacted property owners should be informed — isn't that the spirit of the sign and notice ordinances? I find the timing of this sign's appearance to be rather disturbing. It strikes me as a move designed to allow someone to claim that efforts were made above and beyond city ordinance requirements to inform area residents about the proposed project, when in fact this sign appeared only days before one of the final two city meetings at which this project will be considered and ultimately approved or disapproved, while Colonial Church has been working on this project for more than a year, and the City has been involved for more than six months, and either could have put up signs months ago if there was a sincere desire to inform area residents about this project. I look forward to your response. Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff Place Edina 952 - 920 -1931 Edina City Manager June 16, 2010 RECEIVED Edina City Council and Mayor Edina Planning Commission Edina Planning Department JUN 1 CIO As an Edina Citizen, property owner, tax payer and voter I am enraged at the way the stakeholders of the Countryside district have been trampled on by the City of Edina. Colonial Church has been planning. to construct and APARTMENT BUILDING in the middle of a residential area. The area stakeholders have had no representation of their interests at City Hall. This is shameful and a vivid illustration of why voters are so disgusted with elected representatives. A rezoning of part of Colonial's property was necessary to move the Waters project forward. A sign announcing the possible rezoning of that plot of land was hidden next to the church parking lot on Colonial Way. Our group has asked repeatedly that the sign be placed where it could be viewed by a majority of area residents. Our requests have been repeatedly denied!! Now, two weeks before the review of the Waters final plan by the Planning Commission a sign magically appears on Olinger Blvd. and Colonial Way. WHAT THE ..... ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? We feel manipulated, ignored, insulted by the actions of our elected officials and the administrative staff of the City of Edina. We, the residents of Edina, are the city. You work for us. This whole business of allowing someone building an apartment building in a beautiful residential area STINKS. We deserve better than this. Spencer Turner 6208 Hillside Rd. Edina MN