Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-01-22_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 22, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of January 8, 2013 and Work Session of January 8, 2013 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 01/10/13 , TOTAL $947,495.74; and Pre -List Dated, 01/17/2013 , TOTAL $1,019,247.14 and Credit Card Transactions dated 11/27/12 — 12/26/12 TOTAL: $19,566.79 C. Addendum To Golden Valley Dispatch Contract D. 2013 Community Health Services Agreement With Bloomington Language Correction E. Traffic Safety Report Of December 12, 2012 F. Approve Special Assessment Agreements —Richmond Hills Park G. .Resolution No. 2013 -11 Purchase of Easement And Condemnation Of Land For Removal Of Lift Station No. 1 H. Request For Purchase — 2013 GMC Sierra 4WD Vehicle, Public Works I. Lease Agreement For Use of Radio Equipment On Community Water Tower J. Resolution No. 2013 -13 Approval of Removal Of Remarketing Agent For Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Apartments Project), Series 2004 And Appointment of Successor Remarketing Agent K. Resolution No. 2013 -15 Accepting Urban Area Security Initiative Grant (UAS110- 00732) L. Resolution No. 2013 -16 Accepting Emergency Management Performance Grant (OMB -A133) M. Resolution No. 2013 -10 Supporting Grant Application, Hennepin County HRA For Supplemental Transit - Oriented Development Funds, Edina Medical Plaza Project, 6500 France Avenue Agenda /Edina City Council January 22, 2013 Page 2 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Neighborhood Boundaries And Names And The Related Neighborhood Association Policy B. PUBLIC HEARING - Vacation Request, Roadway Easement Adjacent to 5205 Benton Avenue, Resolution No. 2013 -12 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution,No. 2013 -14 Accepting Various Donations B. Edina Swim Club Residency Requirement C. Authorize Bids For Countryside Park Renovation IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Art Center Board, November 15, 2012 2. Community Health Committee, October 17, 2012 • Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues ,es an Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council January 22, 2013 Page 3 3. Edina Transportation Commission, November 15, 2012 4. Energy & Environment Commission, November, 8, 2012 5. Heritage Preservation Board, December 11, 2012 6. Park Board, December 11, 2012 7. Planning Commission, December 12, 2012 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA -Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012 III. Resolution No. 2013 -01 Authorizing Purchase Of Property At 3944 West 49 %: Street, (Favorable Vote Of Majority Of Commissioners Present To Approve) IV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. 77 SCHEDULE OF;UPCOMINGAMEETINGS /D TA ES /EVENTS h t. Jan 22 Closed Session — Discussion Of Real Estate Matters 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Jan 22 Work Session - Naming & Donation Policy Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Jan 22 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Feb 5 Work Session - Legislative Update 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Feb 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Feb 18 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Feb19 Work Session —Jnt Meeting Art Center Board & Wk Groups 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Feb 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mar 5 Work Session — Construction Management Plan 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mar 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mar it Annual Board & Commission Dinner 5:00 P.M.WARREN HYDE CLUBHOUSE, BRAEMAR Mar 20 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mar 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS L' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 8, 2013 7:04 P.M. - — OATH OF OFFICE — City Clerk Mangen administered the oath of office to Council Member and HRA Commissioner Mary Brindle and Mayor and HRA Chair James B. Hovland. Hennepin County Chief Judge Swenson administered the oath of office to Council Member and HRA Commissioner Ann Swenson. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item IV.D., Resolution No. 2013 -01, designating Official Newspaper for 2013, as follows: M.A. Approve regular, work session, and closed session meeting minutes of December 18, 2012 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 20, 2012, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $336,204.77; Police Special Revenue $279.40; PIR Debt Service Fund $1,864.33; Working Capital Fund $46,634.75; Equipment Replacement Fund $3,575.00; Art Center Fund $1,399.31; Golf Dome Fund $389.04; Aquatic Center Fund $25,598.14; Golf Course Fund $20,922.74; Ice Arena Fund $25,115.94; Edinborough Park Fund $14,319.31; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $9,855.51; Liquor Fund $205,188.36; Utility Fund $39,746.41; Storm Sewer Fund $11,659.24; PSTF Agency Fund $1,215.47; Centennial TIF District $10,085.42; TOTAL $754,053.14; and for approval of payment of claims dated December 27, 2012, and consisting of 22 pages; General Fund $102,493.56; Police Special Revenue $396.00; PIR Debt Service Fund $1,901.15; Working Capital Fund $134,140.75; Equipment Replacement Fund $9,463.03; Art Center Fund $97.88; Golf Dome Fund $141.80; Aquatic Center Fund $66.25; Golf Course Fund $4,643.02; Ice Arena Fund $1,214,425.90; Edinborough Park Fund $5,429.80; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,886.05; Liquor Fund $196,892.15; Utility Fund $35,848.30; Storm Sewer Fund $3,909.69; PSTF Agency Fund $1,356.66; TOTAL $1,715,091.99; and for approval of payment of claims dated January 3, 2013, and consisting of 25 pages; General Fund $80,248.58; Police Special Revenue $15,000.00; Working Capital Fund $46,559.12; Equipment Replacement Fund $9,223.76; Art Center Fund $1,595.68; Golf Dome Fund $269.38; Aquatic Center Fund $48.89; Golf Course Fund $8,788.51; Ice Arena Fund $10,299.27; Edinborough Park Fund $13,955.00; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $6,306.23; Liquor Fund $306,600.30; Utility Fund $663,663.08; Storm Sewer Fund $7,923.14; Recycling Fund $32.97; PSTF Agency Fund $11,861.08; Payroll Fund $7,653.59; TOTAL $1,190,028.58; and, Credit Card Transactions dated October 26 — November 26, 2012; TOTAL $14,146.20. IV.C. Re- Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem IV.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -02, Signatory Resolution Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council /January S. 2013 z J IV.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -03, designation of Director /Alternate Director of Suburban Rate Authority IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -04, designation of Director /Alternate Director of LOGIS IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -05, authorizing facsimile signatures IV.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -06, designating official depositories IV.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -07, appointment to Edina Fire Relief Board IV.K. Set -the 2013 date for Board of Appeal & Equalization for April 8, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. IV.L. Annual appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector IV.M. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -09, Joint Powers Agreement with City of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Edina IV.N. Request for Purchase, one 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, Police Department, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $25,522.15. IV.O. Request for Purchase, five 2013 Ford PI Utility Vehicles, Police Department, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Nelson Auto Center at $131,845.10. IV.P. Request for Purchase, one 2013 Ford Explorer,. Police Department, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midway Ford at $24,931.40. IV.Q. Request for Purchase, two Toro Greenmaster Mowers, Braemar Golf Course, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing at $47,632.76. IV.R. Waive Second Reading Adopting Ordinance No. 2013 -01, Setting Morningside Water Rates for 2013 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-01, DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 2013 — ADOPTED In response to the Council's concern that the Edina Sun Current was not delivered to multi - family homes, Communication & Technology Services Director Bennerotte advised that in 2012, staff received only one call related to a circulation issue that was unresolved through the Edina Sun Current's call center. She explained that American Community Newspapers had a system -wide policy to not deliver to multi - family housing because the buildings were secured and property managers would not allow the newspapers to be left outside. She noted that extra copies of the Edina Sun Current would be available at City Hall and all published notices were available on the City's website under the "notices" section. Manager Neal suggested a strategy with the building owners relating to the official newspaper of the City. He noted the official newspaper requirement was for a newspaper of general circulation. The Edina Sun Current met that requirement. In addition, the Edina Sun Current was a free publication which was different from newspapers used by some other cities. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -01 designating official newspaper for 2013. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-08 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council/January 8, 2013 Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations `o the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations: Member Brindle introduced. and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -08 accepting various donations. Member �Be ttr g e seconded the motion. - - Rollcall: - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson; Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES -APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the following reappointments: Art Center Board: Kitty O'Dea; Board of Appeal & Equalization: Ron Anderson, Michael Friedberg, .Jeff Johnson, Steve Suckow, and Gordon' Tuchenhagen;, Community Health Committee: Kumar Belani and Matt Doscotch; Energy & Environment Commission: Bob Gubrud, Keith Kostuch, Bill Sierks, and Paul Thompson; Heritage Preservation Board: Ross Davis; Human Rights & Relations Commission: Jan Seidman; Park Board: Ellen Jones, Louise Segreto, and Keeya Steel: Planning Commission Arlene Forrest and Michael Platteter; Transportation Commission: Nathan Franzen and Paul Nelson; Edina Housing Foundation (not an advisory board or subject to attendance requirements): Jack Rice. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION -SCHEDULED Following discussion of availability, Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, directing staff to schedule the 2013 Annual Volunteer Recognition Reception at Braemar Clubhouse from S to 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 30, 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS - Received X. MANAGER'S COMMENTS - Received Xl. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 22;2013. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the January 8, 2013, meeting available Page 3 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 8, 2013 Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:07 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 5:11 p.m. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Wayne Houle, City Engineer; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director and John Wallin, Finance Director. Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of the meeting was to review planning for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Economic Development Manager Neuendorf stated topics to be covered during the work session included: 1: Investing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assets - where, when and how to prioritize investments; 2) Public parking at 50h & France — costs borne by the City and costs borne by property owners and tenants; 3) Tools to stimulate actions — Grandview District, Pentagon Park area, other areas; 4) Funding public infrastructure — Hazelton Road conversion The Council discussed with staff how projects to be funded with existing TIF proceeds could be selected. It was noted that many projects would be competing for funding including: the Greater Southdale Area Transportation Study, France Avenue sidewalks, France and Hwy 62 intersection, Hwy 62 pedestrian bridge, old Public Works building demolition, Hazelton Road roadway conversion, and 50th .& France Parking Improvements. Members indicated preference for the use of funds for public infrastructure improvements that should stimulate private investment or support and attract successful industry clusters. The challenges and benefits of the possible areas for investment such as the Grandview District or Pentagon Park were discussed. Also discussed were the ways that TIF assets could be used to aid funding public infrastructure possibly using a form of pay -go TIF assistance for extra- ordinary redevelopment costs. This would transfer risk to the developer. Members expressed the desire for public infrastructure to be a high priority for requested TIF investment. It was also noted that it would be desirable to have public control of any project that was commensurate with the public benefit. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 22, 2013.. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 1 1/10/2013 - 1110/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367216 111012013 100613 AAA 11.00 TAB RENEWAL 305696 010313 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.00 367217 1/1012013 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 2,242.95 NEW RINK HOSES 00001484 305473 1- 845928 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 2,242.95 367218 111012013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 711.36 UB TEMP 305377 36984916 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 711.36 367219 111012013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 101.20 305518 1642989 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING. 100.40 305519 1642984 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 201.60 367220 1110/2013 122055 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. 352.69 HELMET DECALS 00003525 305612 186933 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 8.02 HELMET DECALS 00003525 305697 186962 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 360.71 367221 111012013 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 53.64 CLOCK REMOTE 305378 35886 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 53.64 367222 111012013 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 102.97 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 305422 118435 5720.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 102.97 367223 111012013 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 1,984.43 BICYCLE BLVD DESIGN 305613 53720 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 1,200.00 WAY FINDING FOR RAMPS 305614 53713 44008.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS P21 50TH&FRANCE CENTER RAMP 3,184.43 367224 1110/2013 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 33.87 305615 123112 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 64.98 305615 123112 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY. 101.08 305615 123112 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 132.88 305615 123112 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 146.40 305615 123112 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 249.78 305615 123112 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 370.96 305615 123112 1470.6201 5840.6513 5841.6406 1400.6105 Subledger Account Description LAUNDRY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 119/2013 7:42:46 Page - 2 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1553.6180 1,099.95 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 367225 1/1012013 5821.6182 116466 ANDERSON, TOM 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 28.05 REIMBURSEMENT 305616 123112 1470.6182 85.77 REIMBURSEMENT 305616 123112 SENIOR CITIZENS 113.82 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 5420.6182 367226 1110/2013 CLUB HOUSE 101772 APCO INTERNATIONAL INC RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 1551.6182 69.00 MEMBERSHIP - TONY MARTIN 305695 #388509 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 69.00 367227 111012013 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 504.86 FOOD 00002365 305423 1855756 1,049.86 FOOD 305698 1856991 466.49 FOOD 305699 1858981 2,021.21 367228 1/1012013 131089 AQUATIC ROCK FORMATIONS LLC 6,965.00 REMAINING BALANCE ON PROJECT 305424 1290 6,965.00 367229 111012013 131440 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ASSOCIATES 50.00 TESTING ATARNESON PARK 00001580 305700 13-003 50.00 367230 111012013 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 255.96 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 305425 10109743 255.96 367231 1/1012013 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 20.00 305701 010113 33.00 305701 010113 33.28 305701 010113 44.71 305701 010113 66.29 305701 010113, 68.66 305701 010113 99.35 305701 010113 131.26 305701 010113 182.79 305701 010113 217.79 305701 010113 233.31 305701 010113 5840.6513 5841.6406 1400.6105 Subledger Account Description LAUNDRY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 119/2013 7:42:46 Page - 2 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 111012013 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA BELLBOY CORPORATION YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 305520 76517700 5862.5512 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 305522 233.32 5842.5515 305701 010113 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 305523 250.88 5842.5513 305701 010113 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 305524 646.03 5842.5513 305701 010113 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 305525 2,260.67 5942.5515 128.24 367232 111012013 87828800 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 4,319.47 741.96 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 305426 3849 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 741.96 550.59 MILEAGE 367233 111012013 123112 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 550.59 169.80 BUSINESS CARDS 305617 494 1400.6575 PRINTING BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 169.80 398.40 PIZZA 367234 1110/2013 2054 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 398.40 265.04 BATTERIES 00001574 305702 018 - 290472 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 265.04 367235 1/10/2013 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 1,000.19 GLASS REPLACEMENT 305380 00092441 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 241.00 4 -MAN GOALIES 305474 00092417 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 482.01 305475 00092419 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 367236 111012013 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 686.20 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 305520 76517700 5862.5512 790.49 305521 76517300 5842.5512 22.05 305522 76517400 5842.5515 340.65 305523 76515600 5842.5513 2,154.10 305524 76518100 5842.5513 197.74 305525 87828700 5942.5515 128.24 305526 87828800 5862.5515 4,319.47 367237 111012013 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 550.59 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 305618 123112 1130.6107 550.59 367238 111012013 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 398.40 PIZZA 305381 2054 5520.5510 398.40 367239 1110/2013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 119/2013 7:42:46 Page - 3 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL WELL HOUSES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COMMUNICATIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/1012013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 123.50 COFFEE 305382 1061553 5520.5510 342.75 COFFEE 305383 1062601 5520.5510 466.25 367240 , 111012013 131437 BETTER HOMES DEVELOPMENT LLC 71.83 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 305619 5832 WOODDALE 5900.2015 AVE 367241 111012013 130922 BI WORLDWIDE 4,403.00 SERVICE AWARD CARDS 305703 ME- 664692 1513.6103 4,403.00 367242 111012013 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 22.06 FINANCE CHARGE 305620 ACCOUNT 117267 5511.6406 22.06 367243 111012013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 11.95 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003531 305427 80952977 1470.6510 3,501.30 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003541 305428 80957786 1470.6510 3,513.25 367244 111012013 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 690.50 305527 111432 5842.5513 690.50 367246 111012013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 225.60 STEP ASSEMBLY, CLIPS 00005872 305621 697317 1553.6530 81.33 ARM ASSEMBLY, ALUMINUM 00005836 305622 697277 1553.6530 437.96 MUFFLER 00005842 305623 700225 1553.6530 183.73- CREDIT 00005694 305624 CM686393 1553.6530 121.66- CREDIT 00005184 305625 CM641349 1553.6530 2.94- CREDIT 00005813 305626 CM599363 1553.6530 13.66- CREDIT 00005916 305627 CM610088 1553.6530 1,190.42- CREDIT 00005727 305628 CM690539 1553.6530 331.13 MUFFLER PIPE 00005878 305629 699483X1 1553.6530 80.54 FILTERS 00005844 305630 700342 1553.6530 318.68 MUFFLER, ELBOW 00005878 305631 699483X2 1553.6530 9.43 INDICATOR 00005848 305632 701348 1553.6530 138.10 VALVE 00005853 305633 702305 1553.6530 30.99 NOZZLES 00005853 305634 702340 1553.6530 54.93 FILTERS 00005855 305704 703045 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD CUSTOMER REFUND 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page- 4 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION, GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 1/10/2013 — 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 12.76 PIPE 00005855 305705 703267 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 209.04 367246 111012013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 350.00 BW SAMPLES 00001543 305429 1205779 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 350.00 367247 111012013 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 468.57 REPLACED GLASS; GLAZING 305430 520530S 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 468.57 367248 1110/2013 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 32.07 TUBE LIMESTONE 00007165 305476 12275174 -00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 32.07 367249 1110/2013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 150.00 BASIC NARCOTICS CLASS 305431 554 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 367250 1110/2013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 45.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 305777 010813 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 45.00 367251 1110/2013 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,819.40 305528 219588 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 328.05 305674 00010408 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,147.45 367252 111012013 100677 CARGILL INC. 23,101.71 ICE CONTROL SALT 305477 2900882264 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 9,060.96 ICE CONTROL SALT 305478 2900884757 - "' 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 32,162.67 367253 111012013 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1,632.38 8034001 -1 305384 8034001 -12/12 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,632.38 367254 1110/2013 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 191.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 305479 70757 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 191.00 367255 111012013 123898 CENTURYLINK R55CKREG LOG20000 CLAY 3 49.28 CITY OF EDINA 305385 155300009 -12112 5511.6189 Council Check Register 326.84 00079303 - 0155300018 305386 155300018 -12/12 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 122.04 952 831 -0024 305706 0024 -12112 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 56.50 952 929 -0297 305707 0297 -12/12 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 326.32 952 927 -8861 305708 8861 -12/12 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 504.86 111012013 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 367256 1110/2013 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 194.19 285.93 367262 111012013 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER LIGHT & POWER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 6 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT STORM LIFT STATION MAINT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COMMUNICATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE RANGE CLUB HOUSE 264.26 C CLAY 3 49.28 00079303 - 0155300009 305385 155300009 -12112 5511.6189 326.84 00079303 - 0155300018 305386 155300018 -12/12 5511.6189 10.19 00079303 - 0155300010 305387 155300010 -12/12 5511.6189 326.84 00113667- 0120835016 305635 120835016 -12/12 5111.6189 713.15 367257 111012013 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 194.19 65% XCEL BILLING 305432 5502 5934.6185 194.19 367258 111012013 114548 CIZEK, DARIN 69.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 305388 123012 1400.6203 69.48 367259 111012013 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 430.00 COCOA, CAPPUCCINOS 00002366 305433 0741707 -IN 5761.5510 195.00 COCOA 00002370 305636 0746420 -IN 5761.5510 625.00 367260 111012013 101346 COLOURS 925.00 EPS CREATION OF POLICE LOGO 305480 10362 1130.6103 925.00 367261 111012013 120433 COMCAST 106.95 INTERNET 305434 396908 -12/12 5760.6105 82.46 8772 10 614 0165667 305637 165667 -12/12 5424.6406 96.52 8772 10 614 0177449 305638 177449 -12/12 5420.6188 285.93 367262 111012013 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER LIGHT & POWER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 6 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT STORM LIFT STATION MAINT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COMMUNICATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE RANGE CLUB HOUSE 264.26 C CLAY 3 305639 I INV000072971 5 5110.6564 C R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 7 1/10/2013 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367263 111012013 128726 COTE, DARREL 44.94 - 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 305709 010213 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 44.94 367264 1110/2013 104310 COUNTRY ENTERPRISES INC. 171.00 PLOW MARKERS 00005767 305481 30408 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.00 367265 1110/2013 130171 CTM SERVICES INC. 34.68 LIFT ARM PIN W /NUT 00002368 305435 2590 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 34.68 367266 1110/2013 127913 CUTTER SALES 25.32 BELTS 305482 84404 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.32 367267 1110/2013 104020 DALCO 2,007.26 ICE MELTER 00001566 305389 2550339 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,007.26 367268 1110/2013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,536.57 305529 683353 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,249.27 305530 683351 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 767:30 305531 683352 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,553.14 367269 111012013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 113.44 DIRECTORY ADS 305436 650243624 -12/12 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 723.55 110311893 305641 110311893 -12/12 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 836.99 367270 111012013 115356 DIEKMAN, LARRY 119.95 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 305710 010213 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 119.95 367271 111012013 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 JAN 2013 ADVERTISING 305711 30912 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 683.33 JAN 2013 ADVERTISING 305711 30912 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 683.34 JAN 2013 ADVERTISING 305711 30912 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,050.00 367272 111012013 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 119/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 8 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,000.00 GALA SPONSORSHIP 305712 32692 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,000.00 GALA SPONSORSHIP 305712 32692 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,000.00 GALA SPONSORSHIP 305712 32692 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 3,000.00 367273 111012013 118010. EGAN, BILL 508.82 BEAVER REMOVAL 305390 121712 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 508.82 367274 111012013 100049 EHLERS 300.00 REDEMPTION 2005E 305713 63570 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 300.00 367275 111012013 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 126.50 MANAGEMENT FEE 305642 123112 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 126.50 367276 111012013 100747 ELSMORE AQUATIC 360.77 GOGGLES, SKOOGLES 305483 56679 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 165.40 LIFEGUARD UNIFORMS 305484 56778 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 526.17 367277 111012013 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 56.49 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003870 305437 1520053 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 56.49 367278 111012013 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 300.00 ACQUISITION AGENT 305643 00 -10568 10044.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB 300.00 367279 1/10/2013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 292.88 AUTO PARTS 305438 69- 086491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT. OPERATION GEN 27.68 DEXCOOL 305439 69- 086654 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.41 WATER PUMP, THERMOSTAT 305440 69- 086652 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.30 FRONT IMPACT SENSOR 305485 70- 129413 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 458.27 367280 111012013 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 79.09 SIGNS 305486 190 -62511 5710.6575 - PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 79.09 367281 111012013 130136 FADS, SUSAN CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 1/1012013 —1110/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 107.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 305644 123112 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 107.12 367282 111012013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 561.61 METER 00001424 305391 0005861 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 1,305.32 CS FITTINGS 00001525 305392 0007726 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,365.37 CLAMPS 00001535 305441 0007912 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3,232.30 367283 111012013 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. 1,996.13 BOOTS, CARABINERS 00003527 305645 57205 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 1,996.13 367284 111012013 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 305714 2458719 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 367285 111012013 131188 FIRST-SHRED 21.80 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 305487 69905 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 367286 111012013 102727 FORCE AMERICA 344.62 SOLENOID KIT 00005847 305442 01397122 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,544.66 BOOM, WIRES 00005784 305443 01397199 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,889.28 367287 111012013 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 95.46 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 305393 123112 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 95.46 367288 111012013 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 19.44 REPAIR KIT 305488 71213900 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.44 367289 111012013 126460 FRIENDS OF FIRKIN LLC 398.00 305532 1192 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 398.00 367290 111012013 104980 FRONTIER PRECISION INC. 7,655.46 GPS HANDHELD, BATTERY PACK 00001544 305444 110399 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 7,655.46 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1110/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367291 111012013 115314 GALAXY COMPUTER INC. 532.68 PRINTER MAINTENANCE - JANUARY 305715 7326 1554.6230 80.00 PRINTER MAINTENANCE - FEBRUARY 305716 7399 1554.6230 612.68 367292 111012013 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN 12,579.32 CHILLER #1 REPAIRS 305646 40980 5511.6180 16,540.80 CHILLER #1 REPAIRS 305647 41063 5511.6180 18,215.85 CHILLER #1 REPAIRS 305648 41064 5511.6180 1,327.05- CREDIT 305649 41083 5511.6180 46,008.92 367293 1/1012013 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 201.51 ICE CLEAT STUDS 00001567 305489 1019253449 1648.6406 201.51 367294 111012013 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 23.31 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 305394 123112 5919.6104 23.31 367295 111012013 100025 GOLDEN SHOE STABLES INC. 800.00 SLEIGH RIDES FOR ICE FESTIVAL 305717 010313 5760.6136 800.00 367296 1110/2013 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 391.05 DEC 2012 SERVICE 00001550 305650 56223 5913.6103 391.05 367297 111012013 101103 GRAINGER 608.94 GLOVES 00001522 305395 9022877543 5913.6610 30.85 WALL MOUNT FAN 00002266 305445 9023322929 5720.6406 21.53 SAFETY GLASSES 00005771 305446 9023124820 1301.6610 26.17 CASTER 00005774 305447 9025991036 1553.6530 78.49 CASTERS 00005774 305448 9025870073 1553.6530 765.98 367298 111012013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 517.00 305533 147878 5842.5513 517.00 367299 111012013 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 12,700.00 1ST QTR PAYMENT 305718 010213 5410.6132 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 10 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL•SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 11 1/10/2013 — 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 12,700.00 367300 1/1012013 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 51.61 PLOT SUPPLIES 305490 294023 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 51.61 367301 111012013 100788 H &L MESABI 348.41 ICE BLADES 305449 86549 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 348.41 367302 111012013 101387 HAPPY FACES 240.00 FACE PAINTING AT ICE FESTIVAL 305719 010312 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 240.00 367303 111012013 101255 HASLER INC. 193.10 RATE & STRUCTURE INSURANCE 305720 16403084 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 193.10 367304 111012013 100798 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIPMENT 368.44 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005851 305491 W46445 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 368.44 367305 111012013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 262.50 DEC ROOM & BOARD 305651 1000023844 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 262.50 367306 111012013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 305652 1000023782 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 367307 111012013 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 446.70 FOAM WASH, SANITIZER 00002269 305450 600520933 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 446.70 367308 111012013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,068.34 305534 630252 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,801.00 305675 629891 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 810.00 305676 629893 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,679.34 367309 111012013 100031 1 -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 13,513.36 MEMBERSHIP 305721 2013 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 12 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 13,513.36 367310 1/1012013 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 169.08 CONCESSION PRODUCT 305653 1996885 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 169.08 367311 111012013 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 307.50 ANNUAL VFD CLEANING 00001545 305451 5529 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 307.50 367312 111012013 131441 INTERMEDIATE 287 35.00 CHEMICAL HEALTH FORUM XII 305724 MARK MELANDER 1400.6104 CONFERENCES S SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 367313 111012013 129359 IPMA - HR MINNESOTA 25.00 MEMBERSHIP 305722 JESSICA NIKUNEN 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 60.00 WORKSHOP 305722 JESSICA NIKUNEN 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 25.00 MEMBERSHIP 305723 LISA SCHAEFER 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 60.00 WORKSHOP 305723 LISA SCHAEFER 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 170.00 367314 111012013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,480.74 305535 1999895 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,241.25 305536 1999904 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 78.80 305537 1999905 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 54.00 305538 1999903 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 87.23- 305539 1999902 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 112.00- 305540 1983170 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,267.10 305756 1999894 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,922.66 367316 111012013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 3,049.14 305541 1472029 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .28 305542 1472006 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 236.62 305543 1472036 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 366.16 305544 1472037 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,325.01 305545 1472031 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,147.30 305546 1472016 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 223.58 305547 1472009 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 211.34 305548 1472008 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 514.16 305549 1472015 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.96 305550 1472017 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 4,572.62 1.12 1.12 2,179.19 98.11 3,075.58 1,753.77 5,164.38 201.12 1,064.22 3,648.35 3,680.69 1,730.37 2,109.54 3,322.68 163.56 1.11 31.37 1.12 2,239.29 1,200.75 20.99 3,645.10 2,284.61 49,266.31 367317 111012013 131434 JOHNSON, ALEC 53.67 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 53.67 367318 111012013 120296 KAASA, GUNNAR 20.00 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 95.52 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 115.52 PO # Doc No Inv No 305551 1472020 305552 1472018 305553 1472013 305554 1472024 305555 1472021 305556 1472023 305557 1472027 305558 1472028 305559 1472007 305560 1472022 305561 1472010 305562 1472025 305563 1472026 305564 1472011 305677 1470418 305678 1470419 305679 1455940 305757 1472030 305758 1472014 305759 1472032 305760 1472034 305761 1472035 305762 1472012 305763 1472033 305654 123112 305725 010213 305725 010213 367319 111012013 131439 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 5,516.50 FLIGHT TRACK CHANGES 305655 13195 Account No Subledger Account Description 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SKATING & HOCKEY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTINGENCIES 367320 111012013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 645.92 UNIFORMS 00003895 305452 202412 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.96 00003530 305453 203448 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 - 1110/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 86.69 00003507 305454 204453 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES POSTAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD_ CUSTOMER REFUND REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS BUILDINGS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 14 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 932.57 367321 111012013 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 25.31 PETTY CASH 305656 123112 5760.6513 45.00 PETTY CASH 305656 123112 5760.6235 119.91 PETTY CASH 305656 123112 5720.5510 190.22 367322 1110/2013 131435 LARSON, DAVID 410.06 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 305657 ACCT 330925003 5900.2015 410.06 367323 111012013 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 953.58 ADAPTERS, CONNECTORS 00005773 305492 9301329751 1553.6530 221.32 SCREWS, NUTS, TY RAP 00005889 305493 9301335804 1553.6530 1,174.90 367324 111012013 131165 LEGACY COMPANIES INC. 3,000.00 HVAC WORK ON ADDITIONS 00002332 305456 7217 5750.1720 3,000.00 367325 111012013 116399 L- HEUREUX, ADAM 383.14 UNIFORM PURCHASE 305455 123112 1400.6203 383.14 367326 111012013 118625 LORENTZ, MICHAEL 49.98 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 305726 010313 1301.6201 89.97 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE _ 305726 010313 1301.6201 139.95 367327 111012013 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,018.09 305565 145034 5822.5515 1,018.09 367328 111012013 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 170.60 CLEANER, MOP HEAD 00003536 305457 5049 1470.6511 170.60 367329 111012013 127763 MARTECK 104.00 LICENSE DECALS 305727 69619 1550.6406 104.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES POSTAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD_ CUSTOMER REFUND REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS BUILDINGS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 14 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/10/2013 - 1/1012013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367330 111012013 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 60.23 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 305658 123112 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 60.23 367331 111012013 100869 MARTIN -MCA LUSTER 800.00 PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS 305494 8233 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 400.00 PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT 305495 8234 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,200.00 367332 111012013 131438 MASCHE, MANLEY 1,293.13 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 305659 010413 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,293.13 367333 111012013 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 427.36 OXYGEN 00003649 305496 06069421 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11.95 OXYGEN 00003649 305497 06101428 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 439.31 367334 111012013 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,070.36 WATER HEATER REPAIRS 305396 2586896 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,070.36 367335 111012013 103944 MED COMPASS 56.00 HEARING TESTS 305498 20715 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 56.00 HEARING TESTS 305498 20715 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 112.00 367336 111012013 101483 MENARDS 163.39 TRAIL MARKERS, T -POSTS 00001397 305397 10491 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13.52 STORAGE CONTAINER 00001395 305398 10449 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.18 MARKING PAINT 00001568 305499 14134 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 198.09 367337 1110/2013 131436 METCALFE, ROBERTA 111.39 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 305660 4232 FRANCE AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 111.39 367338 111012013 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 138.19 BROOMBALLS 305661 146385 4077.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 138.19 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page- 16 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367339 111012013 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 353,559.94 SEWER SERVICE 305728 0001006681 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 353,559.94 367340 111012013 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 11,358.40 WATER PURCHASE 305500 431 - 0005.300 -12 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION /12 11,358.40 367341 1/10/2013 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 72.39 SWIVEL CASTERS 00001541 305458 11019 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 72.39 367342 111012013 101912 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU 45.00 PESTICIDE APP LICENSE RENEWALS 305729 2013 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 45.00 367343 111012013 101912 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU 180.00 PESTICIDE APP LICENSE RENEWALS 305730 010213 1643.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 180.00 367344 1110/2013 129622 MINNESOTA OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GR 10.27 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 10.86 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 11.19 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 11.21 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 11.73 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 13.57 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 24.45 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.11 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 31.16 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 46.86 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 59.11 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 79.22 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 122.66 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 128.23 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 130.29 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 166.22 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 251.71 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 329.87 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 - 012186 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 399.90 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 447.21 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Data Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 468.90 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1260.6406 557.70 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 1495.6406 683.57 PRINTER SUPPLIES 305501 012186 5720.6406 4,027.00 367345 1110/2013 102775 MN DNR ECO- WATERS -RES 1,209.70 WELL PERMITS AND FEES 305663 2012 5422.6103 1,209.70 367346 1/10/2013 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 200.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1117/13 305731 010113 5710.6136 200.00 367347 111012013 102776 MRPA 1,935.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 305732 010713 1600.6105 1,935.00 367348 111012013 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 1,212.66 NOZZLE REPAIRS 305459 00371335_SNV 1470.6180 1,985.51 FIRE BOOTS 00003538 305662 00368832_SNV 421470.6710 3,198.17 367349 1110/2013 100916 MUZAK LLC 182.07 MUSIC SERVICE 305733 900AF50546 5861.6406 264.05 MUSIC SERVICE 305733 900AF50546 5821.6406 264.05 MUSIC SERVICE 305733 900AF50546 5841.6406 710.17 367350 111012013 100916 MUZAK LLC 239.54 MUSIC SERVICE 305734 AE97951 5760.6105 239.54 367351 111012013 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHI 125.00 EDINAART CENTER ADS 305664 262784 5110.6122 125.00 367352 111012013 104431 NENA 85.00 MEMBERSHIP - LAURENE DRAPER 305735 M300006675 1400.6105 85.00 367353 111012013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 633.00 305566 78496 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 17 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/912013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 18 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 96.00- 305680 78147 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 537.00 367354 111012013 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 353.60 2013 RANGE PASSES 305736 4834 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 353.60 367355 111012013 115212 NORTH STAR CHAPTER 150.00 SERVICE FEE 2013 305737 2013 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 150.00 367356 1110/2013 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 68.57 STROBE, BULBS 00005843 305460 32214 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 215.93 STROBES 00005845 305461 32258 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 284.50 367357 111012013 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 305738 80838860 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 367358 111012013 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 6,000.00 2013 STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE 305739 2328 5720.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,469.40 BAGS, LOG ROLLS, SAFETY TIES 305740 2330 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 7,469.40 367359 111012013 130454 OVEN HEARTH WHOLESALE BAKERY 103.08 CONEY BUNS 305399 319686 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 103.08 367360 111012013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 114.50 305567 8382858 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 224.68 305568 8382632 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,035.12 305569 8382638 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 519.68 305764 8382636 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,893.98 367361 111012013 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTHLY FEE 305400 21026466 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 367362 1110/2013 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2,059.87 305401 07972572 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 797.89 305402 07972503 5520.5510 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 19 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS 5862.5512 2,857.76 VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 367363 111012013 5822.5512 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,607.64 5842.5513 305570 2358405 5842.5513 851.91 YORK SELLING 305571 2358399 YORK SELLING 187.01 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 305572 2358398 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,897.11 5862.5513 305573 2358397 5662.5513 1,398.04 VERNON SELLING 305574 2358403 VERNON SELLING 696.32 305575 2358402 2,820.36 305576 2358401 66.24- 305577 3496875 427.00 305681 2357360 744.32 305765 2358406 3,733.85 305766 2358396 710.30 305767 2358404 17,007.62 367364 111012013 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 305665 3495397 46.30 367366 1/1012013 100968 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 841.21 JAN -DEC 2013 PEST CONTROL 305741 3077796 841.21 367366 111012013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 70.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005760 305462 210040413 301.72 MOUNT &DISMOUNTS, VALVES 00005760 305463 210040409 150.00 OFF ROAD SERVICE CALL 00005866 305502 210040404 7,864.31 TIRES 00005760 305503 210040383 8,386.03 367367 1110/2013 123377 PROFESSIONAL BEVERAGE SYSTEMS 164.60 PARTS FOR CONCESSION STAND 305403 29430 164.60 367368 111012013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 820.39 TISSUE, LINERS, MOPS 00008020 305404 5952 1,302.96 CUPS, PLATES, CUTLERY 00002267 305504 5953 182.22 ICE PACKS, BANDAGES 305505 5954 65.29 TOWELS, BROOMS 00002264 305506 5957 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 19 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 5511.6136 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6583 5520.6406 5511.6511 5720.5510 5720.6610 5720.6511 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD SAFETY EQUIPMENT CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 20 1/10/2013 —1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business UnR 408.44 TISSUE, CLEANER, LINERS 305507 5960 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 367.78 TOWELS, TISSUE, CUPS 00002371 305666 5958 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 416.96 CUPS, LIDS 00002371 305667 5963 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,564.04 367369 1110/2013 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,030.63 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 305742 1242 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,030.63 367370 111012013 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 706.00 REROUTE WATER LINE 00002362 305464 15266 5750.1720 BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES.BALANCE SHEET 706.00 367371 111012013 123767 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 1,539.50 ABOUT TOWN AD COMMISSION 305405 1212151 -7 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 1,539.50 367372 111012013 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 660.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 305743 010113 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 660.00 367373 111012013 102066 RUST, ROGER 240.00 ICE CARVING FOR ICE FESTIVAL 305744 010313 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -- OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 240.00 367374 1110/2013 104087 SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS INC. 2,799.00 SAFETY TRAINING 00001529 305745 549 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,799.00 SAFETY TRAINING 00001529 305745 549 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 2,801.00 SAFETY TRAINING 00001529 305745 549 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 8,399.00 367375 111012013 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 137.67 101 - ""'•1255 305508 MUFFINS, BUNS 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 137.67 367376 1/1012013 102075 SCULPTURE ICE 126.11 ICE BLOCKS FOR ICE FESTIVAL 305746 010313 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 126.11 367377 1/1012013 100995 SEH 467.02 PLAN REVIEW 305406 264051 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 467.02 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367378 1110/2013 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 78.00 PAINT 00006111 305668 5565 -7 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 78.00 367379 111012013 105664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 390.50 2013 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 305747 75797348 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 390.50 367380 111012013 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 900.00 ARMORER'S COURSE 305748 8841 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 900.00 367381 111012013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 822.70 305578 2019003 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 256.51 305579 2004853 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,154.28 305580 1993156 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 146.78 305581 1993194 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,697.18 305582 1993189 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,031.01 305583 1982389 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 177.00 305584 2004862 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 968.00 305682 1982274 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,938.25 305768 1993157 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,170.40 305769 1993182 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,761.57 305770 1993190 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 805.55 305771 1993198 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 46.10 305772 1993180 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 891.75 305773 1982394 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355.29 305774 2004854 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19,222.37 367382 111012013 104672 SPRINT 5.46 305465 873184124 -121 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 13.00 305465 873184124 -121 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 17.90 305465 873184124 -121 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 22.36 305465 873184124 -121 7411.6188 .TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 27,71 305465 873184124 -121 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 38.48 305465 873184124 -121 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 52.38 305465 873184124 -121 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 52,87 305465. 873184124 -121 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 59.80 305465 873184124 -121 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 68.90 305465 873184124 -121 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 133.90 305465 873184124 -121 1240.6188 149.50 305465 873184124 -121 1553.6188 166.49 305465 873184124 -121 1260.6188 169.52 305465 673184124 -121 1495.6188 173.26 305465 873184124 -121 1301.6188 207.90 305465 873184124 -121 1322.6188 247.26 305465 .873184124 -121 1640.6188 554.68 305465 873184124 -121 5910.6188 788.69 305465 873184124 -121 1470.6151 1,759.36 305465 873164124 -121 1400.6188 4,709.42 367383 111012013 101004 SIPS COMPANIES 72.65 FURNACE IGNITERS 00001519 305407 S2656838.001 1552.6406 10.32 THREAD SEAL 00001540 305669 S2660219.001 5913.6406 82.97 367384 1110/2013 129745 ST LOUIS PARK DQ GRILL AND CHI 17.99 SHEET CAKE 305509 596 5720.5510 17.99 367385 1/1012013 102786 STOP TECH LTD 88.53 TRAYS 305408 T000028 -IN 1400.6406 88.53 367386 1110/2013 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F 600.00 HISTORICAL COLUMNS 305510 320 1130.6123 600.00 367387 111012013 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 150.00 REPLACE SPRINKLER HEAD 305409 1298588 1552.6180 150.00 367388 111012013 102919 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR 195.00 2013 MEMBERSHIP 305749 2013EDIN 1400.6105 195.00 367389 111012013 105386 SUPERIOR IRON INC. 2,087.20 STEEL COLUMNS 00002369 305466 28789 5750.1720 525.00 COLUMN ADJUSTMENTS 00002369 305467 28795 5750.1720 2,612.20 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 22 Business Unit PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE. DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 —1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367390 111012013 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,335.00 305683 008971 5842.5514 596.00 305684 008967 5862.5514 1,931.00 367391 111012013 131286 SWARTOUT, JOE 5,720.00 CONCESSION STAND WORK 305410 512 5500.1785 5,720.00 367392 1110/2013 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 305750 785279 5421.6102 40.00 367393 111012013 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMP 574.99 FILTER ASSEMBLIES 00005846 305468 911385630 1553.6530 574.99 367394 111012013 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,451.00 305585 730173 5862.5514 3,451.00 367395 111012013 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 600.00 FITNESS TRAINING 305751 516 1470.6104 600.00 367396 111012013 131040 TLO LLC 110.50 ACCT 269634 SERVICES 305469 DEC 2012 1400.6103 110.50 367397 111012013 123470 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENTIKIDSDANCE 600.00 NEW YEARS EVE ENTERTAINMENT 305670 123112 5710.6136 600.00 367398 111012013 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 PAYINGAGENT 305671 3294194 3101.6103 425.00 367399 111012013 103048 U.S. BANK 2,100.00 TRUSTEE FEE 305672 3294065 3201.6103 2,100.00 367400 111012013 131173 U.S. FIGURE SKATING Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONCESSION EQUIP 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page- 23 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 1/10/2013 — 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 225.00 ADDITIONAL REGISTRATION FEES 305511 413380 5510.6103 225.00 367401 1110/2013 100050 USPS - HASLER 1,000.00 TMS- 202739 305752 010413 1400.6235 1,000.00 367402 111012013 100060 USPS- HASLER 8,000.00 ACCT # 75983 305753 010213 1550.6235 8,000.00 367403 1/1012013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 626.55 TISSUE, TOWELS, LIQUOR BAGS 305411 259165 -00 5842.6512 46.72- CREDIT 305412 257324CM 5842.6512 47.47- CREDIT 305413 259305CM 5842.6512 532.36 367404 111012013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 15.50 BATTERY 00001218 305414 6952803 1646.6406 15.50 367406 1110/2013 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1,240.56 SAFETY VESTS /JACKETS 305415 314531 1260.6406 1,240.56 367406 1/1012013 119454 VINOCOPIA 266.00 305586 0070094 -IN 5862.5512 46.50 305587 0070091 -IN 5822.5513 130.83 305588 0070090 -IN 5822.5512 232.50 305589 0070093 -IN 5862.5515 675.83 367407 111012013 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 10.00 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 305754 010213 1553.6201 10.00 367408 111012013 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID 100.21 ADA DOOR CLOSER 305512 122112 1646.6406 100.21 367409 111012013 120513 WHITE, AARON 2,000.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 306755 010113 1400.6104 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES I BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 2,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 - 1/10/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367410 1/1012013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,700.40 305590 319420 -00 5842.5513 40.00- 305591 319013 -00 5842.5513 538.00 305685 319228 -00 5862.5513 2,198.40 1/912013 7:42:46 Page - 25 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 367411 1110/2013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,923.51 305592 438692 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 78.80 305593 438690 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 418.91 305594 438691 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 426.00- 305686 60070 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 639.00- 305687 60071 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 305775 438689 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 674.72 305776 438693 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,032.06 367412 111012013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,149.38 305595 159532 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 130.06 305596 158642 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10,197.51 305597 158641 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,288.47 305598 158643 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 188.50 305599 158644 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 41.10 305600 159531 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 94.25 305601 159534 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 815.10 305602 159533 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,173.55 305603 159529 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 32.00- 305604 875743 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 827.70 305688 157649 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,421.95 305689 157665 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,168.10 305690 157992 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,672.40 305691 157993 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 1,168.10 305692 157994 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30,304.17 367413 111012013 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 312.00 305605 105386 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,253.55 305606 105384 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 48.00 305607 105153 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,984.40 305608 105152 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 30.40 305609 105385 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Council Check Register Page - 26 1110/2013 — 1/10/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,033.91 305610 105366 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 168.00 305611 105367 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 168.00 305693 103352 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,153.50 305694 103351 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 13,151.76 367 --14 1/10/2013 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 3,131.28 FIRE GEAR 00003526 305673 E1029184 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 3,131.28 367415 1110/2013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 16,573.51 FRANCE AVE PED CROSSING 305470 8 -01686 -300 01404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 16,573.51 367416 111012013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 36.30 51- 8102668 -0 305416 351940866 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,861.24 51- 9603061 -0 305417 351968389 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,150.48 51- 9251919 -0 305418 351960717 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 32,230.31 51 -4621797 -2 305419 351907627 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 242.54 51- 6046826 -0 305420 352079804 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 221.27 51- 5938955 -6 305421 352081925 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 21,788.16 51- 4888627 -1 305513 352396120 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 6,975.66 51- 6955679 -8 305514 352452649 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 72,505.96 367417 1/1012013 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 6,909.55 UNLEADED FUEL 00005975 305471 532025 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,870.47 DIESEL FUEL 00005975 305472 532026 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19,780.02 367418 111012013 131433 2 SYSTEMS 24,800.58 TRICASTER 00004016 305515 31871- 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 24,800.58 367419 111012013 101091 ZIEGLER INC 46.55 COUPLINGS 00005850 305516 PCO01434828 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 188.28 HOSE 00005852 305517 PCO01435286 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION 234.83 947,495.74 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 947,495.74 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/10/2013 — 1110/2013 Doc No Inv No I Account No Total Payments Subledger Account Description Business Unit 947,495.74 1/9/2013 7:42:46 Page - 27 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 194,785.59 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 425.00 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 2,100,00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 300.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 24,250.27 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 32,274.21 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,648.91 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 558.24 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 15,602.09 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 82,418.94 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 20,852.85 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 12,655.88 05800 LIQUOR FUND 176,172.39 05900 UTILITY FUND 382,527.42 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 501.69 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 422.26 Report Totals 947,485.74 CITY OF EDINA 1/9/2013 7:44:33 Council Check Summary Page - 1 1110/2013 - 1/10/2013 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poijUes and procedures -date. ✓1 / Q /I3 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1116/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 1 1/11/2013 —1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier,/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367420 111112013 122150 HAUER, NORM 75.00 CARICATURE ARTIST 305978 010913 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND &THEATER 75.00 367421 111712013 101833 A.T.O.M. 200.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 305835 2013 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 367422 111712013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 429.78 US TEMP 305782 37030303 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 429.78 367423 111712013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 74.80 305999 1644574 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 65.20 306161 1644580 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 140.00 367424 111712013 129458 ACME TOOLS 255.37 CORDLESS DRILL, BELT 00001493 305783 1674763 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 255.37 367425 111712013 129469 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 4,879.33 WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONSTR 306076 37306245 05473.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 4,879.33 367426 111712013 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 3,490.35 CLOCKS 306120 35755 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 3,490.35 367427 111712013 102715 ALLEGRA EDINA 52.14 EDP GUEST INFO CARDS 306052 96621 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 52.14 367428 111712013 105638 ALPHABITS BAND 125.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/31/13 306211 010113 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 125.00 367429 111712013 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 163.95 COFFEE 306051 156317 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 163,95 367430 111712013 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1111/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 60.78 ART WORK SOLD 306070 011013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS RUBBISH REMOVAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 2 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER 60.78 367431 1/17/2013 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 47.70 VALVE 305904 AFS- 230070007 1553.6530 47.70 367432 111712013 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 315.06 COPIER PAPER 306053 10348706 -00 5410.6513 315.06 367433 111712013 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 46.80 ART WORK SOLD 306071 011013 5101.4413 46.80 367434 111712013 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 518.78 FOOD 306054 1860571 5730.5510 518.78 367435 1117/2013 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 203.42 ELEMENT 00005895 305979 10110661 1553.6530 191.90- CREDIT 306202 10105293C 1553.6530 11.52 367436 1117/2013 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 255.31 JAN 2013 305986 01/01/13 7411.6182 255.31 367437 111712013 118768 ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL 84,328.38 TANDEM AXLE CAB & CHASSIS 00005307 305903 DJ441419 5900.1740 84,328.38 367438 1/1712013 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY _ 150.00. EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/24/13 306210 010113 5710.6136 150.00 367439 1117/2013 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 304.00 GENERAL LABOR CONSULTING 305784 109936 1120.6103 304.00 367440 111712013 100643 - BARR,ENGINEERING CO. 702.50 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 306077 23270354.00 -194 5932.6103 REPAIR PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS RUBBISH REMOVAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 2 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 7411.6406 5510.6107 5511.6180 5500.1705 5510.6406 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5515 5862.5515 5822.5515 5822.5512 5862.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5515 5842.5515 7411.6136 5101.4413 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 702.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 367441 111712013 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 102195 BATTERIES PLUS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 214.51 BATTERIES 306078 020 - 257662 YORK SELLING 214.51 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 367442 1117/2013 YORK SELLING 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG YORK SELLING 91.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 305785 123112 91.58 367443 1117/2013 121602 BEAUPRE AERIAL EQUIPMENT 627.56 SCISSOR LIFT TRUCK RENTAL 306079 128935 627.56 367444 1117/2013 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 1,015.31 ADA PATHWAY 305786 131376 -2 1,077.30 POLYCARSONATE SHEETS 306121 00092095 2,092.61 367445 111712013 101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION 123.55 305874 76517500 263.30 305952 76607000 41.99 306000 87862300 231.21 306001 6281100 64.75 306002 87862200 227.85 306003 76606900 2.30- 306004 87835200 386.55 306162 76606700 193.55- 306163 76618400 130.49 306164 87862100 11.52- 306165 87816700 119.00- 306166 87817200 1,143.32 367446 111712013 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,799.02 JAN 2013 SERVICES 305987 140326 1,798.02 367447 1/1712013 117697 BENSON, NANCY 97.50 ART WORK SOLD 306072 011013 97.50 7411.6406 5510.6107 5511.6180 5500.1705 5510.6406 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5515 5862.5515 5822.5515 5822.5512 5862.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5515 5842.5515 7411.6136 5101.4413 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING SNOW & LAWN CARE ART WORK SOLD PSTF OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 4 1/11/2013 — 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367448 111712013 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 591.75 PIZZA 305787 308847 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA,CONCESSIONS 49.80 PIZZA 306145 2077 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 641.55 367449 1117/2013 125139 BERNICK'S 1,070.48 305953 36195 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 16.00- 306005 9195 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,054.48 367450 1117/2013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 68.25 COFFEE 305836 1064210 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 150.95 COFFEE 305905 1064214 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 45.00 COFFEE 306122 1058276 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 664.00 COFFEE 306123 1063659 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 928.20 367451 111712013 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 162,884.50 PREMIUM 306146 LOG10 -S1- 2/2013 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 24,153.50 306147 LOG10- F3- FEB201 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3 187,038.00 367452 111712013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 101.85 MARKERS, LABELS 00001437 305906 83051 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 101.85 367453 1117/2013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,379.87 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003548 305837 80965764 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 16.55 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003815 305838 80964036 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,396.42 367454 111712013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,093.25 COMPACTION TESTING ,305788 363916 1280.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 4,923.84 SOIL REMEDIATION 306080 363919 05535.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PW BRAEMAR SITE LEAD ABATEMENT 227.00 MATERIALS TESTING 306081 363914 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 428.75 MATERIALS TESTING 306082 363915 01382.1705,21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE 6,672.84 367455 1/1712013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 1,920.00 MNJIS 10/12 -12/12 305928 96462 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,920.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 5 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367456 111712013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 306208 011413 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.00 367457 111712013 117760 BURNSVILLE HTG & A/C 185.80 PERMIT REFUND 305789 ED113067 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 185.80 367458 1/1712013 131460 BUSSE, WILLIAM 1,176.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 306203 011113 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,176.00 367459 111712013 100391 CALL ONE INC. 500.69 DISPATCH EQUIPMENT 00003124 305929 367457 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 500.69 367460 111712013 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 57.20 ART WORK SOLD 306073 011013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.20 367461 111712013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,024.85 305875 221046 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 849.70 305876 221044 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,874.55 367462 111712013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 435.00 305877 95005 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 280.00 306006 95026 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 715.00 367463 111712013 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 793.19 APC SMART UPS 00004304 305839 V902198 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 793.19 367464 111712013 123898 CENTURYLINK 86.32 952 941 -1019 305840 1019 -12/12 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 110.16 952 826 -7398 305841 7398 -12/12 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 56.73 305842 0146 -12112 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 59.43 305842 0146 -12112 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 122.13 305842 0146 -12112 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 141.15 305842 0146 -12/12 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 168.44 192.30 237.33 515.84 1,596.25 606.52 606.52 122.57 22.65 104.93 107.22 205.88 5,062.37 Supplier/ Explanation 612 E12 -6797 612 E01 -0426 952 926-0419 651281-1355 B001311 612 E23-0652 952 835 -1161 952 835 -6661 367465 CITY OF EDINA 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD Council Check Register 1/11/2013 -1/17/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 305842 0146 -12/12 1622.6188 305842 0146 -12/12 5932.6188 305842 0146-12/12 1646.6188 305842 0146 -12/12 5511.6188 305842 0146 -12/12 1554.6188 305946 6797 -1/13 1554.6188 305947 0426 -1/13 1554.6188 305948 0419 -1113 1646.6188 305949 1311-1/13 1400.6188 305988 0652 -1/13 2310.6406 306148 1161 -1/13 5720.6188 306149 6661 -1/13 1552.6188 367465 111712013 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 270.27 DEODORIZER, TRIGGER SPRAYERS 306150 517356 270.27 367466 111712013 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS 425.00 ABOUT TOWN AD 306057 COM1315 425.00 367467 111712013 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 265.00 306167 0178323925 265.00 367468 111712013 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 442.00 COCOA, COFFEE 00002375 305994 0741724 -IN 529.00 COCOA 00002377 305995 0741727 -IN 971.00 367469 1/17/2013 120433 COMCAST 90.85 CABLE; INTERNET 306055 164959 -12112 29.08 CABLE 306056 220686 -1/13 119.93 367470 1/17/2013 114283 COMPAR INC. 1,300.67 SPARE HARD DRIVE 306124 IN2285 5,630.92 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 306125 IN3148 6,931.59 367471 1117/2013 131461 CONSERVATION CORPS MINNESOTA & 5511.6511 5410.6122 5842.5515 5761.5510 5761.5510 5430.6188 5710.6105 421400.6710 421400.6710 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERALSUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CLEANING SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD TELEPHONE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 6 Business Unit SKATING & HOCKEY GENERAL STORM SEWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS BUILDING MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL E911 EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,767.40 BUCKTHORN REMOVAL AT PARK 306083 11561A -501 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,767.40 367472 1/1712013 104310 COUNTRY ENTERPRISES INC. 309.94 PLOW MARKERS 00005768 305843 30409 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 309.94 367473 111712013 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 165.59 114 - 10014090-3 WATER 305930 123112 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 76.48 114 - 09855685 -4 305989 123112 -SMTF 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 242.07 367474 111712013 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 7,070.00 GOLF DOME CONSULTING FEES 306084 38469 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 331.82 GOLF DOME ARCHITECT FEES 306085 38470 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 63,635.40 GOLF DOME ARCHITECT FEES 306086 38471 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 71,037.22 367475 111712013 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 63.70 ART WORK SOLD 306074 011013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 63.70 367476 111712013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 89.60 305878 683870 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,161.10 305879 683869 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 303.50 305880 683868 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,230.45 306007 683867 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 43.90 306008 683866 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 4,828.55 367477 111712013 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 253.14 WRENCHES, RATCHETS 00005893 305907 758751 1553.6556 TOOLS 253.14 367478 1117/2013 103013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 20.00 BUYERS CARDS 306151 010113 5820.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 20.00 BUYERS CARDS 306151 010113 5840.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 20.00 BUYERS CARDS 306151 010113 5860.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 60.00 367479 111712013 131448 DICOSTANZO, ELISA 105.00 BOWLING CLUB REFUND 305844 010713 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 7 Business Unit COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 8 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105.00 367480 111712013 123162 DISH 52.39 8255 7070 8142 2839 305990 010413 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 52.39 367481 111712013 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 144.00 CARAMEL CORN 306087 1577 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 144.00 367482 111712013 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 60.00 IPAD CLASS (3) 306152 32743 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 20.00 IPAD CLASS (1) 306153 32761 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 80.00 367483 111712013 100018 EXPERTTBILLING 7,202.00 DEC BILLINGS 305931 010312 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 7,202.00 367484 1/1712013 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 134.00 305954 125 -2425 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 472.50 306009 125 -2461 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 606.50 367485 1117/2013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 127.67 THREADLOCKERS 305908 1- 4070910 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.70 LINK 305909 1- 4071953 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.70 LINK 305910 69-087405 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.17 BATTERY 305911 69-087591 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 304.24 367486 111712013 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 17.31 FASTENER 305790 MNTC2115024 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.31 367487 111712013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 4,585.90 METERS 00001553 305791 0007942 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 4,585.90 367488 111712013 130699 FLEETPRIDE 324.34 MULTIFASTER KITS 00005439 305932 51642066 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 324.34 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS SEWER REC FEE WATER REC FEE SAC CHARGES SALE OF WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REPAIR PARTS 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY REVENUES UTILITY REVENUES INSPECTIONS UTILITY REVENUES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367489 111712013, 102727 FORCE AMERICA 349.51 CYLINDER SPOOL 00005939 305980 01397688 1553.6530 349.51 367490 1117/2013 129297 FRANA COMPANIES 2,700.00 PERMIT REFUND 305976 ED115007 5901.4646 5,600.00 PERMIT REFUND 305976 ED115007 5901.4645 16,555.00 PERMIT REFUND 305976 ED115007 1495.4307 24,855.00 367491 1/1712013 129297 FRANA COMPANIES 50.64 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 305981 011013 5901.4626 50.64 367492 1117/2013 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 86.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 306058 011113 5120.6406 86.00 367493 1117/2013 100764 G & K SERVICES 16.73 306088 123112 5511.6201 86.10 306088 123112 5913.6201 90.09 306088 123112 1646.6201 125.10 306088 123112 1552.6511 177.88 306088 123112 1553.6201 274.60 306088 123112 1301.6201 770.50 367494 1/17/2013 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN 1,327.05 HEATER REPAIR 305792 41097 5511.6180 3,120.00 REPLACE FAN MOTOR 305845 41176 5511.6180 64,754.25 CHILLER #2 REPAIR 306126 41098 5521.6180 112,249.83 CHILLER #2 REPAIR 306127 41180 5521.6180 5,715.00- FREON LEAK 306128 41179 5521.6180 175,736.13 367495 111712013 101662 GCSAA 170.00 DUES - JEFFREY LUGER 305846 299346 5410.6105 170.00 367496 111712013 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY- MINNEA 24.13 AUTO PARTS 305933 14309180 -12/12 5761.6530 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS SEWER REC FEE WATER REC FEE SAC CHARGES SALE OF WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REPAIR PARTS 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY REVENUES UTILITY REVENUES INSPECTIONS UTILITY REVENUES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/11/2013 - 1117/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 234.75 AUTO PARTS 305933 14309180 -12/12 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 7410.6218 1646.6406 1552.6406 1301.6556 1553.6530 1553.6610 1301.6406 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5511.6136 1322.6180 5913.6406 5710.6136 EDUCATION PROGRAMS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERALSUPPLIES 1/1612013 8:03:35 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERALSUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 18.00 VALENTINE'S PARTY REFUND 305918 JONATHAN KROLAK 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 18.00 258.88 367497 111712013 125289 GLOCK PROFESSIONAL INC. 3,510.00 GLOCKARMORER'S COURSE 306089 MN121112 3,510.00 367498 1/1712013 101103 GRAINGER 27.49 FIRE EXTINGUISHER BRACKETS 00001563 305912 9030177597 312.10 PAPER PLATES, CUPS, TISSUE 00005779 305913 9029966901 682.98 WRENCHES, HAMMERS, PLIERS 00005779 305913 9029966901 81.31 ADHESIVE 00005898 305914 9031127450 135.76 WELDING GLOVES 00005890 305915 9030657408 201.10 GLOVES 00005901 305916 9032825912 1,440.74 367499 111712013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 678.00 305955 148016 2,627.50 306010 147829 2,567.50 306168 147832 5,873.00 367500 111712013 130849 GRIFFIN, GINNIFER 14.50 WINTER CLASS REFUND 305847 010813 14.50 367501 111712013 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 2,335.29 HOCKEY RINK JUNCTION BOX 00REPAIR 306090 120614 2,335.29 367502 111712013 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 129.23 SHOVELS, GLOVES 00001554 305917 3- 108232 129.23 367503 111712013 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 100.00 BAL DUE FROM 1/10/13 306201 011013 100.00 367504 111712013 130142 HAMMER RESIDENCES 7410.6218 1646.6406 1552.6406 1301.6556 1553.6530 1553.6610 1301.6406 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5511.6136 1322.6180 5913.6406 5710.6136 EDUCATION PROGRAMS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERALSUPPLIES 1/1612013 8:03:35 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERALSUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 18.00 VALENTINE'S PARTY REFUND 305918 JONATHAN KROLAK 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 18.00 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 11 Subledger Account Description Business Unit LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register 1/11/2013 — 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367505 111712013 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,389.63 JAN PREMIUM 305991 6157140 -2 9900.2033.16 3,389.63 367506 111712013 101255 HASLER INC. 193.10 POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 305793 16434412 1400.6235 193.10 367507 111712013 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. 148.78 LIMESTONE 00001516 305794 291885 5932.6406 148.78 367508 111712013 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 MEAT PATTIES 306059 024323 5421.5510 153.12 367609 1/1712013 100002 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 586.00 MT REFRESHER COURSES 306092 27610 1400.6104 586.00 367510 111712013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,235.05 TIFADMIN FEE 305934 24 -2012 1000.1303 5,388.84 TIFADMIN FEE 305934 24 -2012 9232.6103 7,623.89 367511 1117/2013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 305975 1000023783 1190.6105 1,068.60 RADIO ADMIN FEE 306091 121238014 1470.6151 546.12 RADIO ADMIN FEE 306204 121238076 1301.6151 1,672.16 RADIO ADMIN FEE 306205 121238015 1400.6151 3,447.19 367512 111712013 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 449.61 FOAM WASH, SANITIZER 00002272 306060 600528207 5720.6511 449.61 367513 111712013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,688.50 306011 630784 5862.5514 2,566.50 306012 631031 5842.5514 653.00 306169 630847 5822.5514 4,908.00 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 11 Subledger Account Description Business Unit LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/11/2013 —1/1712013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367514 111712013 131453 HRABAN, BRITTANY 51.75 BACKGROUND CHECK 305919 REIMBURSEMENT 1400.6103 51.75 367515 111712013 131462 . HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION 937.00 INSTALL NEW PANEL 306129 145902 5511.6180 1,856.00 DOOR HOLDER/SMOKE DETECTION 306129 145902 5500.1705 2,115.00 REPLACE PANEL -WEST ARENA 306129 145902 5511.6180 4,894.00 BANNER LIGHTING 306129 145902 5500.1705 9,802.00 367516 1/1712013 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 286.08 CONCESSION PRODUCT 306061 2003552 5730.5510 164.84 CONCESSION PRODUCT 306154 2000192 5520.5510 450.92 367517 1/1712013 129572 ICOP 179.42 BATTERIES 306130 0004383 -IN 1400.6406 179.42 367618 1117/2013 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 51.44 PLUMBING PARTS 00001581 305920 749419 1646.6530 51.44 367619 1/1712013 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 240.00 OFFICIATING FEES 305848 366 4077.6103 240.00 367520 1/1712013 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 110.00 S-B EXAMS REIMBURSEMENT 305982 010813 5923.6260 110.00 367521 1/1712013 127389 JAN LASSERUD CONSTRUCTION INC. 4,025.19 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 00002053 306093 12 -2227B 5750.1720 3,000.00 306094 12 -2227C 5750.1720 7,025.19 367622 1117/2013 102146 JESSEN PRESS 10,049.00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 306095 35845 1130.6123 10,049.00 367523 111712013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSES & PERMITS BUILDINGS BUILDINGS 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 12 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,799.64 306013 1999931 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 53.80 306014 1999932 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,136.15 306015 1999943 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 42.66- 306016 1999944 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,815.13 306170 1999930 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,762.06 367524 111712013 131456 JOHN J. MORGAN COMPANY 152.40 SPARK RODS 00001560 305935 22845 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 152.40 367526 111712013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 10,135.00 305956 1477329 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 305957 1477307 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.12 305958 1477309 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 58.24 305959 1477335 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 49.02 305960 1477330 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 443.94 305961 1477336 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 208.28 305962 147732 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 469.35 306017 1477306 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,366.02 306018 1477323 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,906.45 306019 1477326 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,695.57 306020 1477327 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 544.96 306021 1477315 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,573.39 306022 1477310 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 122,12 306023 1477305 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 25.12 306024 1477317 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,402.57 306025 1477331 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,321.37 306026 1477334 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3.36 306027 1477314 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,492.52 306028 1477333 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 187.74 306029 1477308 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 674.39 306171 1477316 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,060.73 306172 1477313 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 281.61 306173 1477311 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 835.70 306174 1477304 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,500.12 306175 1477321 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 765.00 306176 1477801 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .56 306177 1477312 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,478.14 306178 1477322 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 801.00 306179 1477324 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 14 1/11/2013 - 1117/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,175.22 306180 1477325 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 841.88 306181 1477328 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 44,422.73 367527 111712013 100198 KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. 96.02 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306206 011013 1495.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS 96.02 367528 1117/2013 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 168.00 JAN 2013 SERVICE 305921 123112 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 168.00 DEC 2012 SERVICE 306069 12/31/12 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 336.00 367529 111712013 131447 KUO, TINA 7.25 WINTER CLASS REFUND 305849 010813 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 7.25 367530 111712013 101220 LANG EQUIPMENT INC. 168.56 TIRES, ELEMENT 00002355 306096 252966 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 106.82 BATTERY 00002373 306097 252523 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES. OPERATING 16.59 FUEL FILTER ASSEMBLIES 00002373 306098 252514 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 291.97 367531 1/1712013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 142.53 NUTS, SCREWS 00001470 305795 9301284046 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 28.74 HEX CAP SCREWS 00001470 305796 9301287241 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 120.03 THERMAL GLOVES 00001504 305797 9301326605 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 270.89 CLEANERS, CABLE TIES 00001509 305798 9301313159 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15.25- CREDIT ON ACCT 305936 1400083484 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 546.94 367532 111712013 130108 LIFELINE TRAINING LTD 258.00 USE OF FORCE TRAINING 305850 2583 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 258.00 367533 111712013 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,161.77 306182 145440 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,161.77 367534 111712013 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 800.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 305799 8235 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 800.00 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2015 8:03:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/11/2013 - 1117/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367636 111712013 124447 MCCULLOUGH, SCOTT 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/20/13 306209 010113 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 367536 111712013 131057 MCF /LINO LAKES 4,792.50 PAINTING WORK CREW 306131 117461 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 4,792.50 367637 111712013 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,504.00 INSPECTION CONTRACT 1- 3/2013 306062 64984 5720.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,753.61 REPAIR HOT WATER BOILER 306099 2587260 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 698.00 CLEANED BURNER & FLAME ROD 306100 2587293 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,955.61 367638 111712013 101483 MENARDS 8.24 BITS 00001384 305800 9961 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 6.36 PAIL 00001463 305801 11792 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 46.98 PVC PIPE, EYE BOLTS 00001482 305802 12358 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 23.94 AMMONIA 00001515 305803 13570 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 74.37 LUMBER, DECKSCREWS 00001571 305804 14207 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 21.25 LUMBER 00001514 305805 13588 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 53.38 ICE MELT 00006302 305806 13739 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 122.24 TOOLS, HARDWARE 00001583 305922 14789 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 106.70 FURNITURE DOLLIES 00008023 306133 14221 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 25.61 FURNACE PADS 00001577 306155 14666 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 489.07 367539 1117/2013 101625 METRO FIRE CHIEFS OFFICERS ASS 200.00 DUES 305851 010813 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 367540 111712013 100886 METRO SALES INC 143.21 DEC COPIER USAGE 306101 494342 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 705.38 SCAN FUNCTIONS FOR MFPS 306132 47038A 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 848.59 367641 1117/2013 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 305852 4239 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 306156 4250 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 285.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/11/2013 — 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367642 111712013 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 53,851.05 DEC 2012 SAC 306102 011113 1495.4307 53,851.05 367643 111712013 104650 MICRO CENTER 16.02 ADAPTER 00004384 306134 4227420 1600.6406 16.02 367544 111712013 100351 MIKE'S SHOE REPAIR INC. 66.00 GEAR REPAIRS 306103 12072012 1470.6180 66.00 367645 111712013 105483 MINN JUVENILE OFFICERS ASSN 370.00 MNJOA CONFERENCE 305854 2013 1400.6104 370.00 367646 1117/2013 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 40.69 CO2, METHAIR 306104 171056968 7413.6545 40.69 367547 111712013 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 55.57 SWEEPER PARTS 00001582 305923 11039 1648.6530 55.57 367648 1117/2013 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS 1,000.00 LEADERSHIPACADEMY,(2) 305853 3637 1400.6104 1,000.00 367549 1/17/2013 101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS 414.00 DEPARTMENT DUES 305855 010813 1470.6105 414.00 367660 111712013 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 298.37 CIP BOOKLETS 305807 12631 1160.6575 298.37 367551 1/1712013 130960 MNCAR EXCHANGE, THE 225.00 1ST QTR FEES 305856 520430 9232.6105 225.00 367552 1/1712013 101658 MPELRA 150.00 MPELRA WINTER CONFERENCE (2) 305857 010113 1120.6104 1116/2013 8:03:35 Page - 16 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS GENERALSUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING FINANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 1116/2013 8:03:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 1/11/2013 -1/1712013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 367553 111712013 131449 NEUTGENS EXCAVATING 21.48 PERMIT REFUND 305858 ED119152 1495.4114 HEATING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 21.48 367554 111712013 129349 N1, ZHENYA 7.25 WINTER CLASS REFUND 305859 010813 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 7.25 367555 111712013 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 13.41 HITCH PIN 00001572 305808 510261 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 13.41 367558 111712013 131448 OLSON, TRUDY 7.25 WINTER CLASS REFUND 305860 010813 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 7.25 367567 111712013 130464 OVEN HEARTH WHOLESALE BAKERY 68.72 CONEY BUNS 306135 319781 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 34.36 CONEY BUNS 306157 319850 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 103.08 367668 111712013 104895 OVERHEAD DOOR CO. 390.45 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 305809 76880 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 390.45 367559 1/1712013 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 81.70 PAINTGRADE SLATWALL 00006308 306063 304068 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 81.70 367560 1117/2013 129485 PAPCO INC. 132.71 TISSUE, FOAM SOAP 305992 75686 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 132.71 367561 1/1712013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 5,153.26 305881 8383292 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 56.58 305882 8383345 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,022.76 305883 8383310 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 314.87 306183 8383305 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,547.47 R55CKREG LOG20000 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2.24 CITY OF EDINA 305964 7.00 - 5862.5512 7.58- VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 3496877 1.50- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 139.36 305966 1/11/2013 -111712013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367662 111712013 5842.5513 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. YORK SELLING 3.36 2361886 646.89 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,105.00 IT CONSULTING 306106 10513006 1554.6103 YORK SELLING 367666 111712013 1,105.00 4,984.97 PAINT I SUPPLIES 4,984.97 306034 367563 111712013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 131452 PELLETIER- SKOOG, ANNICK 306035 2361889 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 173.00 CLASS REFUND 305924 010913 5101.4607 306037 2361899 173.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306038 2361897 367564 111712013 VERNON SELLING 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2361885 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 306186 413.58 5842.5512 305996 07972689 5761.5510 2361890 5822.5513 374.70 50TH ST SELLING 306030 00114613 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 174.47 306064 07972701 5730.5510 119.00- 306065 07972675 5421.5510 391.10 306184 07761854 5842.5515 367565 111712013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2.24 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,166.15 305964 7.00 - 5862.5512 7.58- VERNON SELLING 12.00- 3496877 1.50- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 139.36 305966 1,771.51 5842.5513 3,331.53 YORK SELLING 59.02 3496878 587.24 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 228.48 305968 276.89 5842.5513 3,121.58 YORK SELLING 3.36 2361886 646.89 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 74.24 306032 1,089.78 5842.5513 12,470.19 YORK SELLING 367666 111712013 131291 PITTSBURGH PAINTS 4,984.97 PAINT I SUPPLIES 4,984.97 306034 367667 111712013 131458 PLANTE, ANNE Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLASS REGISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 18 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GRILL YORK SELLING 305963 2361887 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 305964 2361898 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 305965 3496877 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 305966 3496879 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 305967 3496878 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 305968 3496876 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306031 2361886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306032 2361894 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306033 2361895 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306034 2361896 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306035 2361889 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 306036 2361888 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306037 2361899 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306038 2361897 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306185 2361885 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 306186 2361893 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 306187 2361890 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 306188 2361891 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 306136 BRAEMAR ARENA 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 19 Business Unit ASSESSING SENIOR CITIZENS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 198.00 BLADE SHARPENING 305810 CITY OF EDINA 5511.6136 R55CKREG LOG20000 ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 198.00 Council Check Register 111712013 102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 50.00 ASSESSMENT OVERPAYMENT REFUND 305983 011113 1190.4391 OTHER FEES 50.00 367672 1/1712013 367568 1117/2013 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 743.05 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 305950 011013 1628.6235 POSTAGE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 325.00 907.83 CUPS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00002376 305997 5968 367669 111712013 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 393.96 CUPS 306066 5871 79.83 622833 WATER 306105 622833 -12112 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,044.84 79.83 367670 1117/2013 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 19 Business Unit ASSESSING SENIOR CITIZENS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ti 198.00 BLADE SHARPENING 305810 262985 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 198.00 367571 111712013 102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 258.00• PRACTICE PUCKS 305861 317508 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 258.00 367672 1/1712013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 743.05 NEW OFFICE SUPPLIES 00007501 305811 5964 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 907.83 CUPS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00002376 305997 5968 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 393.96 CUPS 306066 5871 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 2,044.84 367673 1/1712013 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 185.43 ACCESS CARDS 306137 61583 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 185.43 ACCESS CARDS 306137 61583 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 370.86 367674 1117/2013 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 1,175.00 INSTALL WATER FILL LINE 00002374 306107 15268 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,175.00 367576 111712013 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 2013 SAFETY BOOTS 305862 2680000000367. 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 300.00 2013 SAFETY BOOTS 305862 2680000000367 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 450.00 367676 111712013 131445 RIVERVIEW REMODELING 35.88 PERMIT REFUND 305812 ED116650 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 35.88 ti R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 20 1/11/2013 — 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367677 111712013 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 122.14 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 305863 00278272 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 122.14 367578 111712013 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 408.95 PLUMBING REPAIRS 306156 22616955135 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 408.95 367579 1117/2013 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 305937 928262741 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 367580 111712013 122530 SATO AMERICA INC. 61.83 PROPERTY ROOM SUPPLIES 305813 30332899 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 61.83 367581 111712013 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 391.25 LUMBER 00002328 306108 41081176 5750.1720 BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET 165.28 LUMBER 00002328 306109 41080900 5750.1720 BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET 576.53 367582 111712013 100991 SCHWAB - VOLLHABER- LUBRATT 253.75 PRESSURE SWITCH 306110 121129 -007 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 253.75 367583 1117/2013 103219 SGN WENDEL 4,416.00 ARCHITECTURAL FEES 306111 3621 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATH 4,416.00 367584 1/1712013 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 120.99 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306112 122812 5110.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.99 367585 111712013 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 65.96 PAINT 00001477 305814 7514-6 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 65.96 367586 1/1712013 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 34.20 PAINT 00006109 305815 8443 -0 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 34.20 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/11/2013 - 1117/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367587 111712013 101201 SIEMS, JEFFREY 87.25 FLASHLIGHT 305864 010813 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 87.25 367588 111712013 120784 SIGN PRO 438.72 CONCESSION SIGNS 305816 6308 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 795.28 PRODUCT SIGNS 305865 6305 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,234.00 367589 111712013 123905 SNIPERCRAFT INC. 37.00 SNIPER TARGETS 305993 011013 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 37.00 367590 111712013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,577.50 305891 2009001 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 559.73 305892 2004870 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,242.73 305693 2004871 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,573.56 305894 2019029 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,872.00 305969 2009000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 763.84 305970 2019028 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 152.50 305971 2004869 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,979.00 306039 1980943 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.62 306040 2019030 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,267.15 306041 1993187 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,889.80 306042 2019031 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,753.58 306043 1980935 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 214.00 306189 1995049 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,984.50 306190 1982395 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 485.50 306191 1980926 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 31, 356.01 367591 111712013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 19.00 PLUG 00001556 306067 S2665723.001 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 25.91 TOOLS 00001344 306113 S2629483.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 44.91 367592 111712013 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SO 216.97 MONITORING FEES 305984 9873813 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 216.97 367593 111712013 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 700.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 305817 A13318914 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 ADVERTISING LEGAL 158.60 CITY OF EDINA ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 367595 111712013 Council Check Register 130334 STEVEMER, BOB ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 21.94 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - 700.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 305817 A13318914 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 700.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 305817 A13318914 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,100.00 1,174.50 WEST ARENA CHILLER REPAIRS 306136 367594 111712013 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 1,174.50 158.60 SUBSCRIPTION 305925 493121 -12/12 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES i ADVERTISING LEGAL 158.60 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 367595 111712013 ADMINISTRATION 130334 STEVEMER, BOB ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 21.94 ART WORK SOLD 306075 011013 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 21.94 367596 1/1712013 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 1,174.50 WEST ARENA CHILLER REPAIRS 306136 9283 1,174.50 { 367597 111712013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 74.69 PUBLISH VACATION NOTICE 305866 1417114 42.22 NEIGHBORHOOD NAMING NOTICE 305867 1417113 19.49 PUBLISH POLICE AUCTION NOTICE 305868 1417115 68.94 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -21 305938 1415492 40.46 PUBLISH AERATION NOTICE 305939 1415491 40.46 PUBLISH AERATION NOTICE 305940 1415490 363.72 PUBLISH 2013 SUMMARY BUDGET 306159 1418125 i 649.98 367598 111712013 114800 SUPERIOR WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT 8,250.00 DEER REMOVAL 306207 #1 8,250.00 367599 111712013 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 2,116.00 - 306192 009161 2,116.00 367600 1/17/2013 129311 SYVERTSEN, MARSHALL 59.94 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 305926 010813 59.94 367601 1117/2013 130783 THEIS, BYRON 87.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306068 011113 87.58 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page- 22 Business Unit VERNON SELLING CONTINGENCIES ART CENTER REVENUES 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1509.6103 5822.5514 1646.6201 1260.6107 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEER CONTROL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING LAUNDRY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 1116/2013 8:03:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367602 1117/2013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 52.65 306044 731351 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,346.20 306045 731350 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,398.85 367603 111712013 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 468.73 1/13 -3/13 SERVICE 306160 3000343758 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS- 468.73 367604 1/17/2013 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 450.00 FITNESS TRAINING 305818 INV500 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 450.00 367605 111712013 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 JAN 2013 MAGAZINE AD 305869 2012 -88733 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 JAN 2013 MAGAZINE AD 305869 2012 -88733 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 330.00 JAN 2013 MAGAZINE AD 305869 2012 -88733 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 990.00 367606 111712013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 262.50 COUNCIL MINUTES 12J18/12 305819 M19521 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 262.50 3676.07 111712013 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 59.45 HOSE, FITTINGS 305927 171865PC 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.45 367608 111712013 128347 TKO WINES INC. 114.00 305972 618012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 114.00 367609 111712013 120595 T- MOBILE 32.63 477067848 SURVEY PHONE 306114 122712 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 32.63 367610 111712013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 31.53 WELDING GAS 305941 4539D6 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.04 WELDING TANKS 306115 453907 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 73.57 367611 111712013 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 145.35 PLASTIC SHELF LABELS 305870 28590 5862.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/1612013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/11/2013 - 1117/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 145.35 PLASTIC SHELF LABELS 305871 28591 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 290.70 367612 1/1712013 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 26.50 BACKGROUND CHECKS 305820 12219382 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 26.50 367613 111712013 .123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 340.00 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 305951 102004166 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 340.00 367614 1117/2013 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 373.96 COMBINATON LOCK 00001570 306116 558109 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 373.96 367616 111712013 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 305942 010313 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 17.90 367616 111712013 125032 UNISELECT USA 876.21 AUTO PARTS 306139 123112 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 876.21 367617 1117/2013 120839 UNITED FIRE FIGHTER ASSOCIATIO 30.00 DEPARTMENT DUES 305872 010813 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.00 367618 111712013 101908 US FOODS 32.91 COST 43805514 306117 123112 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 187.38 CUST 43805514 306117 123112 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 328.78 CUST 43805514 306117 123112 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 549.07 367619 111712013 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 182.66 FUSES, WIRING HARNESS 00002364 305998 65990 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 182.66 367620 1117/2013 128680 VIDACARE CORPORATION 997.01 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003509 305821 58400 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 997.01 367621 1/1712013 119454 VINOCOPIA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 25 1/11/2013 - 1/17/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 876.00 305884 0070092 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 876.00 367622 111712013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 811.46 CONCESSION PRODUCT 306140 35475431 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 393.92 CONCESSION PRODUCT 306141 35512629 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,205.38 367623 111712013 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 55.45 LED BULBS 00005900 305985 15218099 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 55.45 367624 111712013 130574 WATSON COMPANY 8,875.11 NOV-DEC CONCESSIONS 306142 BAR001 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 8,875.11 367625 111712013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,013.52 305885 319761 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 544.25 305895 319757 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 730.22 306193 319628 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,287.99 36762f 111712013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 3,590.72 306046 439540 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.13 306047 439536 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 306048 439535 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,943.36 306049 439539 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,086.56 306194 439537 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,710.89 367627 111712013 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 WEB - JAN 2013 305873 1057 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 367628 111712013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 71.95 305886 161077 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,163.07 305887 159530 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,862.25 305888 161076 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,541.65 305896 161073 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,295.61 305897 151075 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 64.09 305898 161074 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,487.56 305899 161065 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Council Check Register Page - 26 1/1112013 - 1117/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,255.61 305900 161067 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,858.94 305901 161068 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.20 305902 161069 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 91.35 305973 161071 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 851.96 305974 161070 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 91.50 306050 161066 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,132.98 306195 161072 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,096.90 306196 162718 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 42,011.62 367629 111712013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,290.50 305889 105693 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,990.45 305890 106238 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,639.58 306197 108121 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 240.00 306198 108122 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 306199 107891 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,119.20 306200 107890 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,301.23 367630 111712013 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 266.00 HELMET SHIELDS 00003526 305822 E1028424.001 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 266.00 367631 111712013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 22.31 51- 4151897 -6 305823 352388863 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.53 51- 7567037 -0 305824 352433021 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 224.91 51- 6137136 -8 305825 352413353 5430.6185 LIGHT &'POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 463.82 51- 4827232 -6 305826 352406295 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 500.12 51- 6229265 -9 305827 352417897 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,651.91 51-6 6229265 -9 305827 352417897 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,040.94 51- 6979948 -4 305828 352428430 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,374.77 51 -6979948 -4 305828 352428430 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,548.84 51- 6979948-4 305828 352428430 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 528.37 51- 9422326 -6 305829 352455754 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,156.54 51- 4966303 -6 305830 352397573 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 341.87 51- 9013604 -6 305831 352448809 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 1,221.80 51- 5847121 -5 305832 352579111 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 670.59 51- 5634814 -2 305833 352407301 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 2,619.77. 51- 6621207 -1 305943 352760539 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,363.14 51- 6121102 -5 305944 352923054 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6,016.05 51- 5888961 -7 306118 353097058 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 4,441.97 51- 6824328 -7 306119 352935329 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/11/2013 — 1/1712013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 3,530.60 51- 6840050 -6 306143 353115276 5921.6185 15,568.48 51- 5605640 -1 306144 353469819 5911.6185 46,330.33 367632 111712013 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 214.05 DEC USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 305834 065683441 60.24 COPIER USAGE 305945 065683531 274.29 1,019,247.14 Grand Total 1550.6151 1628.6103 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER EQUIPMENT, RENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,019,247.14 Total Payments 1,019,247.14 1/16/2013 8:03:35 Page - 27 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT WELL PUMPS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 332,464.96 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 605.62 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 8,364.15 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 7,197.59 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,047.12 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 71,037.22 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 463.82 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 6,536.06 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 218,411.10 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 6,879.73 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 11,909.93 05800 LIQUOR FUND 204,334.06 05900 UTILITY FUND 132,000.55 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,714.17 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6,277.59 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 5,613.84 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,389.63 Report Totals 1,019,247.14 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 1111/2013 - 1/17/2013 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures date -L /H' Fi 1/16/2013 8:05:15 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/27/12-12/26/12 Number Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2012/12/19 $155.38 FOOD JASONS DELI EDINA EDINA MN 1170.6106 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/11/28 $397.60 TICKET - PORTHAN DELTA AIR 0067149716279 SAN ANTONIO TX 1470.61'34 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/11/28 $397.60 TICKET - WILLEMS DELTA AIR 0067149716280 SAN ANTONIO TX 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/12/03 $195.00 GLASS GLASS AND MIRROR OUTLET 1 952 - 9333223 MN 1470.6180 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/12/07 $20.00 DATA PLAN VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY 888 - 294 =6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/12/10 $25.31 SHIPPING THE UPS STORE 1715 EDINA MN 1470.6103 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/12/16 $100.45 SCOTCHLITE OURDESIGNS.COM 360 - 567 -2520 WA 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/12/21 $2,642.94 TRAINING MNSCU 877- 4666728 MN 1470.6104 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/11/28 $50.37 FOOD EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/12/03 $31.75 FOOD EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/12/07 $52.63 FOOD GOOD EARTH I EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/12/14 $40.26 EATING /DRINKING EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/12/15 $102.84 CELL PHONE SPRINT *WIRELESS 800 - 639 -6111 KS 1120.6188 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/11/26 $312.00 BOOKS BARNES & NOBLE #2514 EDINA MN 1504.6218 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/12/04 $174.16 FOOD D'AMICO & SONS /EDINA EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/12/08 $23.25 FOOD PATISSERIE MARGO EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/12/06 $125.12 CATERING BYERLY'S ST LOUIS PARK MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/12/08 $1.82 BANANAS JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/12/08 $27.78 COFFEE TRAVELER STARBUCKS #02592 EDINA US EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/12/18 $268.37 FOOD D'AMICO & SONS /EDINA EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/12/10 $125.00 .GOV RENEW VSN *DOTGOVREGISTRATION 877 - 734 -4688 VA 1554.6106 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/12/10 $19.95 TRANSACTION FEE PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888- 883 -9770 CA 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/12/10 $18.25 TRANSACTION FEE PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888- 883 -9770 CA 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/12/21 $96.00 MPLS /STP BUSINESS JO CITY BUSINESS - MINNEAPOLIS 612 - 288 -2100 MN 1160.6105 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/11/28 $54.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPLES 00119180 BLOOMINGTON MN 1260.6406 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2012/12/19 $193.04 PROPANE SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 1552.6406 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2012/12/19 $38.60 PROPANE SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 1301.6406 * *6973 GREG BRETSON. 2012/12/18 $175.00 PUMP ASSEMBLY THE CARLSON COMPANY 949 - 768 -3333 CA 1553.6530 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2012/11/28 $106.49 PARTS KIM CONTROLS INC. 763- 7802991 MN 1552.6406 G: \Purchasing cards\2012 purchasing card electronic files\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 1/15/2013 Number Name Date * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2012/12/06 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2012/12/13 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2012/12/14 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2012/12/19 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2012/12/19 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2012/12/06 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2012/11/27 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2012/11/28 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2012/11/29 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2012/11/29 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2012/11/29 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2012/12/11 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2012/12/10 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2012/12/12 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2012/12/12 * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2012/12/11 * *5546 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2012/12/08 * *5546 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2012/12/21 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2012/12/04 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2012/11/28 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2012/12/14 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2012/12/06 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2012/12/13 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012 /11/28 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012/11/29 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012 /11/29 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012 /12/05 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012 /12/05 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012 /12/05 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/27/12-12/26/12 Amount Description Merchant Name $176.31 GEO -DRIVE DANFOSS $746.36 TRAINING MNSCU $88.00 LICENSE RENEWAL DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 $215.00 UTILITY PERMIT HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC WORKS $215.00 UTILITY PERMIT HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC WORKS $112.59 PHONE ACCESSORIES SPRINT STORE #1558 $686.55 TOOLS THOMAS TOOL & SUP -CRY $64.33 TOOLS THOMAS TOOL & SUP -CRY $102.50 BATTERY MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL $229.47 BEST BUY CRAYON BRANDERS.COM $135.00 BOOTS LOWA BOOTS LLC $454.35 BOTTLE FILLING STATIO BUILD.COM NETWORK OF S $22.07 FRAMES OFFICE MAX $50.00 2013 IAPE MEMBERSHI PAYPAL *TAPE $50.00 2013 [APE MEMBERSHI PAYPAL *IAPE $43.01 GAS HOLIDAY STNSTORE 0369 $45.02 FOOD CUB FOOD BROOKLYN P $29.99 CAKE BYERLY'S ST LOUIS P $117.97 SUPPLIES TARGET 00002600 $9.63 ENVELOPES /PUSH PINS OFFICE MAX $5.13 SHARPIES OFFICE MAX $99.00 TRAINING MN NURSERY & LANDSCAPE $99.00 TRAINING MN NURSERY & LANDSCAPE $5.00 SOFTWARE AKSMT.COM $260.00 SHOES NIKE.COM $120.80 GREETING CARDS TCC *CARDS DIRECT $49.58 LIGHTING SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $110.62 LIGHTING SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $32.16 SOFTWARE ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. City 410 - 513 -1162 877 - 4666728 651- 2845528 State Account MD 1552.6406 MN MN 612 - 5960236 MIN 612 - 5960236 MN EDINA MN CRYSTAL MN CRYSTAL MN 8528354910 MN 650 - 3507062 CA 203 - 353 -0116 CT 800 - 375 -3403 CA EDINA 402 - 935 -7733 402- 935 -7733 BAXTER BROOKLYN PARK ST LOUIS PAR ST. LOUIS PAR EDINA EDINA 651 - 6334987 651 - 6334987 877 - 273 -3049 800 - 806 -6453 866 - 700 -5030 AMZN.COM /BILL AMZN.COM /BILL 800 - 833 -6687 MN CA CA MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN CA OR TX WA WA WA 1281.6104 1240.6105 5913.6260 5913.6260 1301.6556 5913.6556 5913.6556 5913.6530 1400.6406 1400.6203 5952.6406 1400.6406 1400.6105 1400.6105 1400.6406 1624.6406 1624.6406 1624.6406 1622.6406 1622.6406 1644.6104 1644.6104 1130.6124 1130.6406 1130.6406 1130.6406 1130.6406 1130.6406 G: \Purchasing cards\2012 purchasing card electronic files\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 1/15/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/27/12-12/26/12 Number Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012 /12/06 $32.16 SOFTWARE ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/07 $49.00 SOFTWARE CTO *GOTOMEETING.COM 800 - 263 -6317 CA 1495.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/08 $199.90 HEADPHONES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/11 $316.92 HARD DRIVE GLOBALONETECHNOLOGY 877 - 418 -3246 NE 1554.6710 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROT72012 /12/13 $20.00 DATA PLAN VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/13 $29.79 INTERVIEW LUNCH JIMMY JOHN'S # 258 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1170.6106 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/17 $20.00 DATA PLAN VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/21 $239.00 APPLECARE APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE 800 - 676 -2775 CA 1554.6710 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012 /12/21 $31.11 ADAPTER APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE 800 - 676 -2775 CA 1554.6710 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/21 $105.13 CABLE APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE 800 - 676 -2775 CA 1554.6710 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012/12/21 $1,018.04 SCREEN APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE 800 - 676 -2775 CA 1554.6710 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT 2012 /12/24 $102.76 MACBOOK APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE 800- 676 -2775 CA 1554.6710 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTT2012 /12/24 $3,279.62 MACBOOK APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE 800 - 676 -2775 CA 1554.6710 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/11/29 $340.00 MEMBERSHIP GCSAA EIFG 8004727878 800 - 472 -7878 KS 5410.6105 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/12 $236.09 SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5410.6105 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/12 $60.00 RADIO LICENSING FCC 877- 480 -3201 DC 5410.6105 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/12 $60.00 RADIO LICENSING FCC 877- 480 -3201 DC 5410.6105 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/13 $18.94 2013 TOBACCO /ALCOH WE CARD 999 - 9999999 IA 5421.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/14 $37.98 TUBELINE ATTACHMENTS DIRECT LLC MO 320 - 7591551 MN 5422.6530 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/21 $57.03 JOHN DEERE GEAR & BE GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT 651 - 7707680 MN 5422.6530 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2012/11/27 $30.01 SOCKET SET THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2012/11/29 $17.78 SUPPLIES WALGREENS #5080 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5520.5510 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2012/12/05 $12.00 SUPPLIES US FIGURE SKATING 719 - 635 -5200 CO 5511.6406 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2012/12/21 $21.04 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2012/12/04 $35.61 POSTAGE PB METER REN *TAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5710.6235 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2012/12/04 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 - 468 -8454 CT 5710.6235 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/11/26 $158.50 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/11/30 $75.05 PAINT SUPPLIES MENARDS 3021 BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/11/30 $6.49 SUPPLIES WW GRAINGER 877 - 2022594 MN 5761.6406 G: \Purchasing cards\2012 purchasing card electronic files\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 1/15/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/27/12-12/26/12 Number Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/11/30 $75.96 SUPPLIES WW GRAINGER 877- 2022594 MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/05 $20.27 PAPER OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5760.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/10 $43.25 PAPER SHARP ELECTRONICS ROMEOV 800- 237 -4277 IL 5760.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/13 $54.58 ICE MELT THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON 'MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/13 $89.55 ICE MELT, DOORSTOP, THE HOME'DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/14 $107.11 RACK, POLYPUSHER, LI( MENARDS 3021 BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/19 $88.90 OFFICE SERVICES SIGN DESIGNS 772 - 581 -8810 FL 5760.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/20 $65.11 GLASS BESSER GLASS & MIRROR BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6530 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/12/21 $5.00 SYSTEM TEST CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EDINA MN 5760.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/11/26. $90.23 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5862.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/11/27 $570.18 LIGHTING SUPPLIES THE RETROFIT COMPANIES 507 - 4552181 MN 5861.6185 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/11/28 $30.00 GIFT CARDS EDINA LIQUOR VERNON EDINA MN 5822.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/11/28 $30.00 GIFT CARDS EDINA LIQUOR VERNON- EDINA MN 5842.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/11/28 $30.00 GIFT CARDS EDINA LIQUOR VERNON EDINA MN 5862.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/07 ($4.92) SHELF THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/07 $4.92 SHELF THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/07 $7.82 SHELF THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/20 $27.34 STAPLER OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5840.6513 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/11/28 $243.94 GATE OPENER GATE HOUSE SUPPLIES 805 - 520 -2714 CA 7411.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/12/01 $30.00 SOFTWARE EMA *EMMA EMAIL MARKETING 800 - 5954401 TN 7410.6105 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/12/03 $20.00 FOOD DOMINO'S 1927 320 - 235 -8277 MN 7410.6106 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/12/04 $68.18 SUPPLIES WW GRAINGER 877 - 2022594 WI 7411.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/12/11 $95.96 ADVERTISING GOOGLE *5107668870 CC @GOOGLE.CONCA 7410.6105 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/12/15 $25.75 SUPPLIES PIER 1 00008359 RICHFIELD MN 7411.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/12/21 ($299.00) SOFTWARE INTUIT *TURBOTAX 800- 446 -8848 CA 7410.6105 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2012/12/05 $24.94 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2012/12/12 $40.06 BUILDING SERVIC PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA IN 612 - 8223180 MN 7411.6215 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2012/12/15 $713.29 SUPPLIES SEARS HHO INC 7652 MINNEAPOLIS MN 7411.6710 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2012/12/17 $18.07 TRASH BAGS THE HOME DEPOT #2845 RICHFIELD MN 7411.6406 G: \Purchasing cards\2012 purchasing card electronic files\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 1/15/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/27/12-12/26/12 Number Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *9781 DAVID AMON 2012/11/30 $17.40 SHIPPING THE UPS STORE 2839 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6215 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2012/12/03 $3.72 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2012/12/04 $21.25 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6215 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2012/12/04 $38.62 CLEANING GUNSTOP RELOADING 9524740211 MN 7412.6406 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2012/12/10 $8.54 LINERS TARGET 00021899 ST LOUIS PARK MN 7411.6406 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2012/12/10 $21.24 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2012/12/17 $83.48 SURGE PROTECTOR THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 $19,566.79 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing police sand am � procedures d& Fin Ci G:1Purchasing cards\2012 purchasing card electronic files\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 1/15/2013 TO: Mayor and Council Agenda Item M IV.C. From: Jeff Long, Action Chief of Police Discussion Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ rl Subject: Addendum to Golden Valley Dispatch Contract Action Requested: Approve the addendum to the contract between the City of Edina and the City of Golden Valley for dispatch services. Information / Background: In September of 2010 we entered into a contract with the City of Golden Valley to provide dispatch services to that community. Upon entering into that agreement we understood that their long -term goal was to join the Hennepin County Sherriffs Dispatch Center. Since that time Hennepin County has approved the construction of a new dispatch center. Golden Valley has been given approval to join that center upon its completion. However, there is not an agreement yet on cost. The switch over date would be approximately June of 2014. Over the last 2 '/2 years we have re- evaluated the expenses necessary to provide this service to Golden Valley. After the initial year of set up and trouble shooting, our expenses have been reduced. Our purpose with this venture has not been to make money, but to provide a quality service and consolidate an essential governmental service. Our scheduling changes, re- structuring and reassignments, have also contributed to the lower cost necessary to cover our expenses. The contract amendment was prepared by City Attorney, Roger Knutson. It lowers the annual fee to Golden Valley from $178,142.00 to $142,140.00 ($11,845.00 a/month). The contract allows Edina to adjust the fee based on increased labor costs and other economic factors. With Golden Valley stating their intent to join the Hennepin County Dispatch Center, we are also enacting a ninety day notice to terminate the contract for either party. If approved by the Edina City Council, Golden Valley will present the agreement to their City Council on February 5, 2013. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN EDINA AND GOLDEN VALLEY FOR PROVISION OF DISPATCH SERVICES AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER AGREEMENT made this _ day of . , 2013, by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Edina ") and the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Golden Valley"). WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into an agreement dated September 7, 2010 for the provision of dispatch services and operation and maintenance of an emergency communication center ( "Agreement "); and WHEREAS, the parties want to amend the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: I . The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect except as amended by this First Amendment. 2. Effective Golden Valley shall pay Edina Eleven Thousand Eight Hundred Forty -five and No /100 Dollars ($11,845.00) per. month ("Base Charge "). Payment shall be due in advance on or before the first day of each_calendar month. For calendar year 2014 and subsequent years, Golden Valley shall pay Edina, in equal monthly installments, the Base Charge adjusted by Edina on January I" each year, as follows: (1) increased labor costs for operation of the E.C.C. under Edina's labor agreements and (2) the rate of increase, if any, over the previous year in the implicit price deflator for government consumption expenditures and gross investment for state and local governments prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysts of the United States Department of Commerce. Adjustments in the Base Charge shall be prospective. 168206v1 Page 2 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION 3. The Agreement, as amended, may be terminated by either party upon a ninety day advance written termination notice delivered by either party to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY BY: F` \IM] BY: James Hovland, Mayor Shep Harris, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager 1682060 ull Thomas Burt, City Manager Page 3 i ;. REPORT / RECOMMENDATfON • •vv. To: Agenda Item M W.D. MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Sherry Engelman, R.S. Community Health Administrator Action X❑ Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: 2013 Community Health Services Agreement Language Correction Action Requested: Approve language correction to the 2013 Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington. Information / Background: Council approved the 2013 Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington at the November 20, 2012 council meeting. Standard language defining Title V Maternal Child Health (MCH) and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) for qualifying women, infants and children, and adults was inadvertently deleted from the agreement during the drafting process. This language has been included in all previous CHS agreements and corrections have been made to reinstate this language back into the 2013 Agreement. The cost of the 2013 Agreement approved on November 20, 2012 remains unchanged. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement language correction. ATTACHMENTS (pdf): Revised 2013 Community Health Services Agreement November 20, 2012 Report/Recommendation City of Edina • 4801 W. SO`" St • Edina, MN SS424 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA TO PROVIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES THIS' AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of _ , by and between the City of Bloomington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ('Bloomington "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Edina "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Bloomington warrants and represents that its Division of Public Health is a duly.certified public health agency operating in accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements; and WHEREAS, Bloomington provides community health services, including, but not limited to public health nursing services (including home visits), public health clinics, health education, health promotion services, disease prevention and control, health planning, and program administration; and WHEREAS, Edina wishes to promote, support, and maintain the health of its residents by providing community health services such as health education, communicable disease programs, public health nursing services, health assessment, counseling, teaching, and evaluation in the community, home and clinic setting at a nominal fee to those making use of such services, and to contract with Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, to provide such services to residents of Edina; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of Bloomington and Edina are authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.04, Subdivision 5, and by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subdivision 10, to provide community health services and to enter into agreements with each other for the providing by Bloomington of community health services to residents of Edina; and WHEREAS, through this contractual arrangement the provision of community health services will enable Edina to document progress toward the achievement of statewide outcomes, as stated in Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.10, Subdivision 5. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, and for consideration of the covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: 1. This Agreement shall be for a period of from. January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. 2. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, agrees to provide residents of Edina with community health services (hereinafter called "Health Services "), which includes activities designed to protect and promote the health of the general population within a community health service area by emphasizing the prevention of disease, injury, disability, and preventable death through the promotion of effective coordination and use of community resources, and by extending Health Services into the community. 3. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, will provide services to Edina for Title V Maternal Child Health (MCH) and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) to qualifying women, infants .and children and adolescents. Edina agrees to assign its rights to Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) funding provided for the MCH and TANF programs for fiscal year 2013. Bloomington will complete all required services, reports and documentation for these programs and will directly invoice MDH for the MCH and TANF services for up to $74,079 that Bloomington provides to Edina residents. 4. Bloomington agrees to provide Health Services to the residents of Edina utilizing the same quality and kind of personnel, equipment and facilities as Health Services are provided and rendered to residents of Bloomington. 5. Bloomington shall provide the Health Services pursuant hereto on a confidential basis, using capable, trained professionals. 6. All Health Services to be rendered hereunder by Bloomington shall be rendered pursuant to and subject to public health policies, rules; and procedures now or hereafter, from time to time, adopted by the Bloomington City Council, and in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, provided, however, that (i) no policy, rule, or procedure hereafter adopted by the Bloomington City Council shall in any way affect, modify, or change the obligations, duties, liabilities, or rights of the parties hereto as set out in this Agreement, or reduce or detract from the kind, quality, and quantity of Health Services to be provided hereunder by Bloomington to residents of Edina, and (ii) all such policies, rules and procedures shall be uniformly applied to all persons receiving Health Services from Bloomington, whether residents of Edina, Bloomington, or any other municipality. Edina agrees to adopt the same policies, rules, and procedures as are from time to time adopted by Bloomington, if determined by Edina to be necessary or desirable to facilitate or regulate the provision of Health Services by Bloomington to residents of Edina pursuant hereto. 7. Edina agrees to pay Bloomington, for Health Services provided pursuant to this Agreement according to the following terms: a. The annual sum of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY -NINE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED SEVENTEEN DOLLARS AND N01100 ($189,217.00) shall be paid in quarterly payments of FORTY -SEVEN THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED FOUR DOLLARS AND 25/100 ($47,304.25) to Bloomington within fifteen (15) days of the receipt by Edina of each of the statements to be given pursuant to Paragraph 6.13 hereof, subject, however, to the provisions of Paragraph 6.0 hereof. b. On April 15, July 15, and October 15, 2013 and on January 15, 2014, Bloomington shall send Edina a statement, certified by Bloomington's Division of Public Health as being true and correct, and covering the period of three (3) calendar months preceding the month in which the statement is given. The statement will set forth, in such detail as Edina shall reasonably require, the numbers of persons served, the kinds of Health Services delivered, the locations where such services were delivered, and such other information as Edina shall reasonably request. c. Should any dispute arise over this Agreement,. Edina shall pay for any undisputed charges for the previous three (3) month period when due. Disputed amounts will be addressed by both parties. If no agreeable solution is reached, the dispute will be handled pursuant to Paragraph 21. 8. In the event Edina desires to inspect the financial. books and records of Bloomington related to the providing of Health Services hereunder by Bloomington, Bloomington shall make its financial books and records available at the Bloomington City Hall for inspection and copying by Edina, or any agent, employee, or representative of Edina, during business hours. 9. It shall be the sole responsibility of Bloomington to determine the qualifications, functions, training, and performance standards for all personnel rendering Health Services under this Agreement; provided, however, that Bloomington agrees that all such personnel shall be capable, trained professionals. 10. Bloomington will communicate with Edina relative to Health Services to be performed hereunder, in the form of reports, conferences, or consultations, as the respective Edina departments shall request. All reports relating to the providing of Health Services that are given by Bloomington to the Bloomington City Council or to the City Manager during the term of this Agreement shall also be given to Edina. 11. Bloomington also agrees to send to Edina an annual report describing the activities performed and Health Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such report shall be in such detail and form as Edina may reasonably request. The annual report shall be sent with and in addition to the last quarterly report acquired by Paragraph 6.13 hereof. Also, at Edina's request, made not more than two (2) times during the term of this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of Bloomington's Division of Public Health shall attend meetings of the Edina City Council, or appropriate board or commission, to answer questions and give further information relative to the activities performed and Health Services rendered under this Agreement. 12. Bloomington hereby agrees to maintain in force its present policy of commercial general liability insurance in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 466, and professional liability coverage in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence for the term of this contract. Said policy shall be with an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota. If requested, the City of Bloomington will provide a certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage. Upon request, Edina may be named as an additional insured on Bloomington's commercial general liability insurance only. 13. Bloomington shall further require medical malpractice insurance coverage by its physicians and other licensed professionals with whom Bloomington has a contract for professional services. 14. Either party may terminate the Agreement by providing the other party one hundred twenty (120) days written notice to the other. Upon such termination, all obligations and liabilities of the parties hereunder shall cease and terminate, except the provisions of Paragraph 11 and 12 hereof shall continue and survive such termination. Also, in the event of termination pursuant hereto, the quarterly payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period ended on the date of termination, and Bloomington shall send to Edina, within thirty (30) days after such termination, a report in the form of, and in lieu of, the annual report required by Paragraph 11 hereto, and Edina shall pay such reduced quarterly payment for the period ended on the date of termination, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of report. 15. Bloomington and Edina understand and agree that each shall apply and qualify, independently and separately, for any and all grants, matching funds, and/or payments of all kind from state, federal, and other governmental bodies relating to, or for the provision of, any or all of the Health Services, and any and all such grants, matching funds, and payments shall belong to the recipient and be used and applied as the recipient thereof shall determine, without regard to this Agreement. 16. All notices, reports, or demands required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when delivered personally to an officer of the party to which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or certified mail, postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: To Bloomington: 1800 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Attention: City Manager To Edina: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Manager Such addresses may be changed by either party upon notice to the other parry given as herein provided. 17. The parties agree to comply with the following laws and regulations: a. Edina agrees to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Bloomington from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Edina. Bloomington agrees to hold harmless an d indemnify Edina from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Bloomington. The parties duties to indemnify and hold harmless are subject to the limitations, immunities and defenses in Minnesota Statute Chapter 466. The City of Bloomington does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Bloomington has designated coordinators to facilitate compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as required by Section 35.107 of the U.S. Department of Justice regulations, and to coordinate compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as mandated by Section 8.53 of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations. For information contact the Human Services Division, City of Bloomington, 1800 Old West Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431; telephone (952) 563 -8700; TTY: (952) 563 -8740. b. The parties agree to comply with the Minnesota State Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 363A. 18. The parties agree that this Agreement shall not be assignable except at the written consent of both parties. 19. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between Edina and Bloomington and supersedes and cancels any and all prior agreements or proposals, written or oral, between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof; and amendments, addenda, alterations, or modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 20. Each party will comply with all applicable provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes. 21. Bloomington agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Edina against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Bloomington and Bloomington employees or agents. Edina agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Bloomington against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Edina and Edina employees or agents. Both parties to this Agreement recognize that liability for any claims arising under this Agreement are subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Law; Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. In the event of any claims or actions filed against either party, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. 22. Bloomington and Edina agree to submit all claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement to mediation. The mediation shall be conducted through the Conflict Resolution Center, 2101 Hennepin Avenue, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405. The parties hereto shall decide whether mediation shall be binding or non - binding. If the parties cannot reach agreement, mediation shall be non- binding. In the event mediation is unsuccessful, either party may exercise its legal or equitable remedies and may commence such action prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and their corporate seal to be affixed hereto the day and year first above written. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON: Dated: By:, Dated: By: Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. City Attorney Its Mayor Its City Manager CITY OF EDINA: Dated: . By: Its Mayor Dated: By: Its City Manager Otte To: Agenda Item #: : IV.I. MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Sherry Engelman, R.S. Community Health Administrator Action ❑X Discussion ❑ Date: Mewomkor ?n m r) Information ❑ Subject: Renew Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington Public Health Division Action Requested: Renew Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington Public Health Division for $189,217 for calendar year 2013. Information / Bacicground: The 2013 Agreement cost is $189,217which allows for a three percent adjustment from the 2012 cost. This is the first cost adjustment since 2009. The costs for these services are offset by the 2013 Community Health Services Grant funding of $118,977 and local general fund. Community Health Services are delivered to Edina residents of all ages through senior health promotions, vulnerable adult assessments, public health nurse clinics; high risk home assessments, and community health educational opportunities. In addition, Bloomington Public Health works closely with Edina schools and daycares to increase youth assets and help prevent high risk behaviors, they provide outreach to new parents with high risk children, and administer the WIC Program, a food and nutrition program for pregnant women, infants and children in need. Services such as health screenings, health promotions and Immunizations for elderly are coordinated with the Edina Senior Center and senior living complexes. The public health nurses also coordinate with Edina Police, Fire and Health Departments regarding vulnerable adult assessments, partner with the Edina Resource Center to connect residents with resources and services, and counsel with parish nurses and faith communities. By City Council request, the Community Health Committee met with Bloomington Public Health throughout the year and on October 17, to review and evaluate these community health services and programs. Bloomington gave a thorough presentation of the services and programs they provide and had staff on hand to answer questions. The Committee determined that Bloomington provides a variety of valuable programs and excellent service to the residents of Edina and agreed" unanimously to support continuing the contract services. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501 Ss. • Edina, MN 55424 Item IV.I. Renew Community Health Services Agreement With Bloomington Page 2 of 2 The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement. ATTACHMENTS (pdQ: Community. Health Services Agreement Community Health Committee Draft Minutes October 17, 2012 =0 I AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CTiTES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA 'TO PROVIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of by and between the City of Bloomington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Bloomington "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State -of Minnesota ( "Edina "). WTTNESSETH: WHEREAS, Bloomington warrants and represents that its Division of Public Health is a duly certified public health agency operating in accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements; and WHEREAS, Bloomington provides community health services, including, but not limited to public health nursing services (including home visits), public health clinics, health education, health promotion services, disease prevention and control, health planning, and program administration, and - WHEREAS, Edina wishes to promote, support, and maintain the health of its residents by providing community health services such as health education, communicable disease programs, public health nursing services, health assessment, counseling, teaching, and evaluation in the .community, home and clinic setting at a nominal fee to those making use of such services, and to contract with Bloomington, through its. Division of Public Health, to provide such services to residents of Edina; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of Bloomington and Edina are authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.04, Subdivision 5, and by Minnesota Stables, Section 47 1.59, Subdivision 10, to provide community health services and to enter into agreements with each other for the providing by Bloomington of community health services to residents of Edina; and WHEREAS, through this contractual arrangement the provision of community health services will enable Edina to document progress toward the achievement of statewide outcomes, as stated in Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.10, Subdivision 5. - NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, and for consideration of the covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: 1. This Agreement shall be for a period of from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, 2. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, agrees to provide residents of Edina with community health services (hereinafter called "Health Services "), which includes activities designed to protect and promote the health of the general population within a community health. service area by emphasizing the prevention of disease, injury, disability, and preventable death through the promotion of effective coordination and use'of community resources, and by extending Health Services into the community. 3. Bloomington agrees to provide Health Services to the residents of Edina utilizing the• same quality and kind of personnel, equipment and facilities as Health Services are provided and rendered to residents of Bloomington. 4. Bloomington shall provide the Health Services pursuant hereto on a confidential basis, using capable, trained professionals. 5. All Health Services to be rendered hereunder by Bloomington shall be rendered pursuant to and subject to public health policies, rules, and procedures now or hereafter, from time to time, adopted by the Bloomington City Council, and in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, provided, however, that (i) no policy, rule, or procedure hereafter adopted by the Bloomington City Council shall in any way affect, modify, or change the obligations, duties, liabilities, or rights of the parties hereto as set out in this Agreement, or reduce or detract from the kind, quality, and quantity of Health Services to be provided hereunder by Bloomington to residents of Edina, and (ii) all such policies, rules and procedures shall be uniformly applied to all persons receiving Health Services from Bloomington, whether residents of Edina, Bloomington, or any other municipality. Edina agrees to adopt the same policies, rules, and procedures as are from time to time adopted by Bloomington, if determined by Edina to be necessary or desirable to facilitate or regulate the provision of Health Services by Bloomington to residents of Edina pursuant hereto. 6. Edina agrees to pay Bloomington, for Health Services provided pursuant to this Agreement according to the following terms; a. The annual sum of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY -NINE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED SEVENTEEN DOLLARS AND Noll 00 ($1$9,217.00) shall be paid in quarterly payments of FORTY -SEVEN THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED FOUR DOLLARS AND 25/100 ($47,304.25) to Bloomington within fifteen (15) days of the receipt by Edina of each of the statements to be given pursuant to Paragraph 6.B hereof, subject,. however, to the provisions of Paragraph 6.0 hereof. b. On April 15, July 15,.and October 15, 2013 and on January 15, 2014, Bloomington shall send Edina a statement, certified by Bloomington's Division of Public Health as being true and correct, and covering the period of three (3) calendar months preceding the month in which the statement is given. The statement will set forth, in such detail as Edina shall reasonably require, the numbers of persons served, the kinds of Health Services delivered, the locations where such services were delivered, and such other information as Edina shall reasonably request. c, Should any dispute arise over this Agreement, Edina shall pay for any undisputed charges for the previous three (3) month period when due. Disputed amounts will be addressed by both parties. If no agreeable solution is reached, the dispute will be handled pursuant to Paragraph 21. 7. In the event Edina desires to inspect the financial books and records of Bloomington related to the providing of Health Services hereunder by Bloomington, Bloomington shall make its financial books and records available at the Bloomington City Hall for inspection and copying by Edina, or any agent, employee, or representative of Edina, during business hours. 8. It shall be the sole responsibility of Bloomington to determine the qualifications, functions, training, and performance standards for all personnel rendering Health Services under this Agreement; provided, however, that Bloomington agrees that all such personnel shall be capable, trained professionals. 9. Bloomington will communicate with Edina relative to Health Services to be performed hereunder, in the form of reports, conferences, or consultations, as the respective Edina departments shall request. All reports relating to the providing of Health Services that are given by Bloomington to the Bloomington City Council or to the City Manager during the term of this Agreement shall also be given to Edina. 10. Bloomington also agrees to send to Edina an annual report describing the activities performed and Health Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such report shall be in such detail and form as Edina may reasonably request. The annual report shall be sent with and in addition to the last quarterly report acquired by Paragraph 63 hereof. Also, at Edina's request, made not more than two (2) times during the term of this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of Bloomington's Division of Public Health shall attend meetings of the Edina City Council, or appropriate board or commission, to answer questions and give further information relative to the activities performed and Health Services rendered under this Agreement. 11. Bloomington hereby agrees to maintain in force its present policy of commercial general liability insurance in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 466, and professional liability coverage in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence for the term of this contract. Said policy shall be with an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota. If requested, the City of Bloomington will provide a certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage. Upon request, Edina may be named as an additional insured on Bloomington's commercial general liability insurance only. 12. Bloomington shall further require medical malpractice insurance coverage by its physicians and other licensed professionals with whom Bloomington has a contract for professional services. 13. Either party may terminate the Agreement by providing the other party one •hundred twenty (120) days written notice to the other. Upon such termination, all obligations and liabilities of the parties hereunder shall cease and terminate, except the provisions of Paragraph 11 and 12 hereof shall continue and survive such termination. Also, in- the event of termination ' pursuant hereto, the quarterly payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period ended on the date of termination, and Bloomington shall send to Edina, within thirty (30) days after such termination, a report in the form of, and in lieu of the annual report required -by Paragraph 11 hereto, and Edina shall pay such reduced quarterly payment for the period ended on the date of termination, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of report. 14. Bloomington and Edina understand and agree that each shall apply and qualify, independently and separately, for any and all grants, matching funds, and/or payments of all kind from state, federal, and other governmental bodies relating to, or for the provision of, any or all of the Health Services, and any and all such grants, matching funds, and-payments shall belong to the recipient and be used and applied as the recipient thereof shall determine, without regard to this Agreement. 15. All notices, reports, or demands required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when delivered personally to an officer of the party to which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United' States mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or certified mail, postage prepaid thereon, addressed �o the parties at the following addresses: ' To Bloomington: 1800 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Attention: City Manager To Edina: -4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Manager Such addresses may be changed by either party upon notice to the other parry given as herein provided. 16. The parties agree to comply with the following laws and regulations: a. Edina agrees to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the" City of Bloomington from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Edina. Bloomington agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Edina from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Bloomington. The parties duties to indemnify and hold harmless are subject to the limitations, immunities and defenses in Minnesota Statute Chapter 466. The City of Bloomington does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Bloomington has designated coordinators to facilitate compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as required by Section 35.107 of the U.S. Department of Justice regulations, and to coordinate compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1073, as mandated by Section 8.53 of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations. For information contact the Human Services Division, City of Bloomington, 1800 Old West Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431; telephone (952) 563 -8700; TTY: (952) 563 -8740. b.. The parties agree to comply with the Minnesota State Duman Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 363A. 17. The parties agree that this Agreement shall not be assignable except at the written consent of both parties. 18. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between Edina and Bloomington and supersedes and cancels any and all prior agreements or proposals, written or oral, between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and amendments, addenda, alterations, or modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties, 19, Each party will comply with all applicable provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes. 20, Bloomington agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Edina against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Bloomington and Bloomington employees or agents. Edina agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Bloomington against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense, Including reasonable attorney's fees, arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Edina and Edina employees or agents. Both parties to this Agreement recognize that liability for any claims arising under this Agreement are subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Law, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. In the event of any claims or actions filed against either party, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. 21. Bloomington and Edina agree to submit all claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement to mediation. The mediation shall be conducted through the-Conflict Resolution Center, 2101 Hennepin Avenue, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405, The parties hereto shall decide whether mediation shall be binding or non - binding. If the parties cannot reach agreement, mediation shall be non- binding, In the event mediation is unsuccessful, either party may exercise its legal or equitable remedies and may commence such action prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. IN WITNESS VAIMOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and their corporate seal to be affixed hereto the day and year first above written. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON Dated: By: Its Mayor Dated: By: Its City Manager Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. City Attorney Dated: Dated: CITY OF EDINA: ' By: Its Mayor By: Its City Manager NIINUTES COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMrrrEE CITY HALL MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM October 17, 2012 6:30 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Doscotch welcomed members and called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. IL ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Jeff Bartleson, Matt Doscotch, Jan Johnson, Mary Jo Kingston, Nancy Ott - Pinckaers, Carolyn Peterson. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion by Member Peterson and second by Member Ott- Pinckaers "I Motion by Member Ott- Pinckers and second by Member J of Minutes — Regular Meeting September 11, 2012. All V. COM11 None presented. VI. A. Karen Zeleznak, Bloomington Iq nursing services they provide to the City of E Services (CHS) funding for city/county public community health programs. Intl in thes( Services, Help Me Grow Pegg I eve] Women's Health Pro cal a w youth), Creating A Voice assets) quarterly and annual repo oomingtq_ Edina Senior Center, faith bas�dganiztp Statewide doing drug Also discs __was th Stand, and Dr program and Ms. Zeleznak re methods to find semo� local churches, family Ms. Zeleznak also immunization clinics, planning All voted aye. agenda item IV.A. Approval utation on the community health and al perspective of Community Health Lunds must be directed to specific %sessment. Adult and Senior rx7alification depends on income), l Health, Health Promotion (targeting Program). Also discussed were the he school district, the Edina Resource Center, nity groups. Ms. Zeleznak discussed the activities, community readiness for kids not and their impact on the community. the Partners and campaigns such as Edina Sober Squad, Together We ec youth. General information on the Women, Infants and Children amo r ast and cervical cancer was presented. is See oi's Program, efforts toward independent senior living, and ;e. Work is coordinated with Edina police, fire and health departments, protection for the quickest delivery of assistant to needy seniors. cases in Edina schools, meningitis outbreak, annual flu and pneumonia id the Hennepin County Shape Survey on child health. B. Lisa Brodsky, Bloomington Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, gave a presentation on the public health emergency preparedness services provided to the City of Edina. Key aspects include planning for ability to respond to public health emergencies, evaluating resident's ability to respond to emergencies, planning for and exercising distribution of medication, vaccines and supplies, developing and preparing methods to deliver emergency messages to the public, planning communication to reach special populations such as limited English. speaking, seniors, people with disabilities, building relationships with Police, Fire and Emergency management. A volunteer Medical Reserve Corp was established and an emergency preparedness tool kit for faith based communities, Ready, Set, Go was developed. An example of public'health emergency preparedness response is the recent H1N1 outbreak. Response actions included coordination with the Minnesota Department of Health, public messages regarding importance of vaccination and antiviral distribution to individuals in priority groups including those uninsured and underinsured, and organizing and conducting timely mass vaccination clinics in local schools. Focus this year has been planning for care of vulnerable populations and air conditioning options in the event of extreme heat. Member Peterson said Bloomington Public Health is an asset to Edina providing a high level of service to all residents, young and old. The Community Health Committee fully supports the professional efforts of Bloomington Public Health and highly endorses renewing services with them for 2011. Member Peterson said that Edina invested wisely in Bloomington Public Health to provide these important services in our community. Member Peterson made a motion to recommend approval of continued contract services with Bloomington Public Health for 2013. Motion was seconded by Member Ott Pinckaers. All voted aye. Chair Doscotch thanked Zeleznak and her staff for their presentations and to wide variety of_programs, community involvement, and excellent service they provide to the City ` C. Ruth Tripp, SHIP Grant Coordinator, submitted a writt .. to on current Edina SHIP activities. Current projects include 1) a Community Food Partnership and t? d Assessment & Taskforce to determine food access /affordability needs of low- income res }c. , ts,. active ortahon policy and 3) Safe Routes To School consultant study. �� D. Sara Maaske, do.town, gave an update on i- t do.town activities and in ti. es in Edina. Included are 1) an upcoming survey regarding concession choices use want at B ar Arena aitd, emar Golf Course, 2) potential partnership with YMCA for a pilot community gar. Yor ark, 3) Safe es To School and Walk To School day at elementary schools _4., resident peti 10 E - o ossible trails an a3 ground equipment in Lake Edina Park and Council:` i o finance su`r ''C1P, 5) support of franc{iise fees to fund future pedestrian and bicycle projects and 6)) & gs to disc filthier school food. E. Healthy Eating Active Living Resol ~'b r provided a draft letter of re co end ion to Co members agreed that a co "age��;�should bead and positive impacts on .e n reg 3 g, healthy eat supportive of school base •g ens with -,healthy c also encompass a curricula o -pibly im ented thr Liaison Engelman indicated tha s w 1 Yee an with the P d 0 o way Member '' ` o se the mo ll voted ay� satabled fdY meeting. Chair Doscotch ot�' ' of co ' ty garden at Yorktown Park. All gons O ' terest received through do.town e`liviri cial connectedness. Members were is and agre d that a pilot community garden should Parks & Recreations excellent programming. ity for the Community Health Committee to work Viers to approve the draft letter of recommendation. G. Lea sq,rEngelman gavu� ,ppdate a`' "' draft 2013CHC Work Plan. New initiatives to the 2013 work plan are 1) develop; r V lth vision fo city, an )continue research work of subgroups on youth health, seniors and aging health, an e ral health fo''�ps in our system. The youth subgroup discussed bullying as one topic of concern on their agendQ t :, a servo ; sti group will work on transportation. The Council will review and finalize all Board/Commission wor . - 'end of the year. Chair Doscotch gave a review of the Community Health Committee work session w Gi ouncil regarding the draft 2013 work plan. Members Doscotch, Kingston, Peterson and Ott- Pickaers and `' "n Engelman attended the meeting. Suggestions Council members made for work plan consideration included participating with do.town, more active committee work, option for a baseline community health survey, and additional meetings throughout the year. Members also discussed potential opportunities to partner with .other Boards /Commissions such as with the Park Board on a pilot community garden in Yorktown Park and bullying with the Human Rights Commission. Members on the Youth, Seniors and General Health subgroups were encouraged to continue meeting on their respective topics. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None presented. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Member Johnson reported that she and Liaison Engelman attended a "Heart To Heart" community event sponsored by the Minnesota Heart Institute on October 9. The Institute staged a screening for heart health indicators and an expert medical panel discussion followed on prevention of heart disease. Summary screening results may be available to the Community Health Committee. Member Johnson also reported that the senior subgroup has met to discuss senior issues in Edina, in particular VEAP and transportation concerns. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Liaison Engelman presented the tentative meeting schedule for 2013 and also discussed the 2013 , joint Community Health Assessment with Bloomington and Richfield health boards. The Assessment is scheduled for May 21, 2013. X. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Member Kingston and seconded by Member Ott- Pikers to adjourn. All voted aye. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 pm. OWN Next Meeting: January 15, 2013 2013 Meeting Dates: Jan 15 March 19 `V ?b July 16 Se tW 17 October 16 REPORT RECOMMENDATION w�1�,j� o Cel(11� To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: January 22, 2013 Subject: Traffic Safety Report Of December 12, 2012 Agenda Item #: IV. E. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Review and approve the revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 12, 2012. Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the December 12, Traffic Safety Committee Report at their December 20 meeting and made the following comments: Item B 1: Change the sentence "The MNMUTCD has standards in which a Yield sign can be placed at an intersection..." to `The MNMUTCD provides guidance on when a veld sign should be placed at an intersection...' Attachments: Revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 12, 2012 Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of December 20, 2012 G:\ Engineering \infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports \Item IV. E. Traffic Safety of December 12, 2012.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT (Revised December 20, 2012) Wednesday, December 12, 2012 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 12. The Director of Engineering, Public Works Director, Police Traffic Supervisor, and Traffic Safety Coordinator were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the December 20, Edina Transportation Commission and the January City Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: At this time, there are no requests that are recommended for approval. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: 1. Request for a Yield sign at the intersection of Highland Road and Westridge Boulevard. This request is from a resident who lives on Westridge Boulevard. The requestor states that vehicles are having a hard time seeing other vehicles that are travelling on either road. The requestor also mentioned that the high amount of children in'the neighborhood makes driving dangerous without sidewalks in the neighborhood. The requestor feels that placing a Yield sign would be helpful for vehicles to establish a right -of -way. The requestor also requested that the clear -zone be looked at for compliance. There have been no relevant requests in this area. This intersection is Y- shaped with Westridge Boulevard intersecting Highland Road at an angle not at 90 degrees. There have also been zero crashes at this intersection from 2001 to 2010. Pictures are provided below. Westridge Boulevard is classified as a local roadway that has a width of 27 feet with curb and gutter. Highland Road is classified as a local street that has a width of 27 feet with curb and gutter. Both are bituminous Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 1 of 8 December 12, 2012 streets with no sidewalks or parking restrictions on either side. Traffic counts conducted at this intersection show that 283 vehicles enter the intersection on a typical weekday. A check for compliance for clear zone was conducted, and was determined that the corner, is in compliance with the city code for clear zones. The MNMUTCD provides guidance on when a Yield sign should be placed at an intersection as listed below: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2, 000 units per day; R The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right -of- way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; andlor C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right -of -way at the intersection under the normal right- of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. This intersection does not meet warrants set out by the MNMUTCD. Observations conducted at this intersection show no other special considerations. Staff recommends denial of request for a Yield sign. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2 of 8 December 12, 2012 Photo 1: Highland Road and Westridge Boulevard Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 8 December 12, 2012 Photo 3: Westridge Boulevard looking towards Highland Road Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 4 of 8 December 12, 2012 2. Request for parking restrictions on Antrim Road south of Chapel Drive. This request is from a resident who lives on Antrim Road. The requestor has stated that traffic is parking and restricting the sightlines of both Chapel Drive and their driveway. Requestor states that the vehicles are driven by high school students who park on Antrim Road and walk to school. The requestor feels that parking restrictions would help disperse the density of vehicles parked next to Chapel Drive. This is a T- intersection with Antrim Road running north -south and Chapel Drive running east -west. This intersection is also close to Valley View Road. A total of 10 houses would be affected if the restriction were placed from Chapel Drive to 70"' Street West. Pictures are provided below. Antrim Road is classified as a Collector street with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 4104 vehicles with an 85h percentile speed of 36.4 MPH south of Chapel Drive. The street is 43 feet wide with curb and gutter on both sides. Crash records show two crashes at this intersection from 2001 to 2011. One was property damage only in 2002 and the other was a possible injury in 2010. Observations conducted at this intersection conclude vehicles parked on Antrim Road are high school students who park and walk to school. Parking restrictions restricting at certain times could alleviate the issue, however the restrictions would apply to residents as well. After discussion, it was recommended that placing parking restrictions would not be necessary. Enforcement of City Code for parking near a driveway and parking near an intersection would eliminate issues with sightlines. Staff recommends denial of the request for parking restrictions. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 5 of 8 December 12, 2012 Photo 4: Antrim Road looking south Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 6 of 8 December 12, 2012 ti Photo 5: Antrim Road and Chapel Lane SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. At this time, there are no requests that require deferral to a later date. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. 1. Call from a resident requesting traffic counts on Interlachen Boulevard from Schaefer Road to Ride Road. The 2005 traffic counts show an ADT of 2198 vehicles and an 85' percentile speed of 29.4 MPH. 2. Call from a resident requesting a sign to inform drivers of pedestrian crossings on Edina Industrial Boulevard and TH 100. Resident was Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 7 of 8 December 12, 2012 forwarded to - MNDOT; -MNDOT owns and maintains signal operations and signs at this intersection. 3. Call from a resident requesting traffic counts on Xerxes Avenue north of TH 62.. The most recent traffic counts (2012) show an' 'ADT of 14590 vehicles and an 85h percentile speed of 34.6 MPH. 4. Call from a resident requesting information about the traffic control near Xerxes Avenue and TH 62. Requestor was forwarded to MNDOT, who manages that intersection. 5. Call from a resident requesting repair of the traffic signal light at 70I' Street West and Metro Boulevard. Request was forwarded to Edina Public Works, who maintains this traffic signal. 6. Staff reviewed enforcement and observations made on Cornelia Drive near Mavelle Drive regarding parked vehicles. A request was made to investigate the area for possible parking restrictions. The requestor states that vehicles are parking on Cornelia Drive and blocking the turning of buses from Cornelia School. Requestor would like parking restrictions to help buses move freely from the parking lot of the school onto Cornelia Drive. After enforcement of existing City Code, observations made in the area determined that the issue of parked vehicles was resolved. J I ' 1 Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 8 of 8 December 12, 2012 t MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM DECEMBER 20, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Sierks, and Thompson. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF NOV. 15, 2012 The following correction was made: Page 4, paragraph 'Memberianovy said engineering's role in communicai I;re, the communications department and let them know�fvir communications plan can be developed. She said -comp ..r.,64 professionals. They should be developing the relationsi the issues, rather than react. She said in their commit& communications department: how do they -,work to ides delete enrtte paragraph and replace with is should 6e,' ;Provide the technical expertise to i projects are coming up so that a coming iications departrrmerit staff is the communications with therengineeringdepartment to stay ahead of departments ?" Director Houle said he believes they work on lanes took everyone by surprise. He said the communication departments to anticipate upcoming issues %Motion Was rr member Janovy to approve ythe amended minutes of,Nov:r Aye: Bass, Braden, Franzen, 1yer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson,, Abstain: Thompson 1 Motion carried. f ry &sonshe asked, "Whgt,is the role of the e: ,'communications needs of other dt4ssues and residents' reaction to the bike department does not work with other de bi %�tuber Bass and seconded by Sierks Mary Everett, -5600 Park Place, said she was in attendance to be more informed about things like the bike advisory lane o`nWooddale Avenue and airport noise. Laura Hemler, 5601 Bark Place, saiclshe has actively opposed the bike lane on Wooddale Avenue and is in attendance to learn mo�re,about th.eap�rocess and how they were approved. ►Iri 14 0111_1 Director Houle said this is on the agenda because member Janovy brought it to his attention that many of the items listed are transportation related. Member Janovy said she there are items listed such as the Greater Southdale Area Transportation Study that is not on the ETC's Work Plan. She asked for feedback from the ETC and also asked how the projects would be coordinated. Director Houle explained that all the projects in the CIP are staff initiated and that the ETC will become involved but that staff was taking the lead role. He said the Greater Southdale Area Transportation Study is planned because of ongoing redevelopment in the area and staff would like to create a master plan. Member Bass mentioned the Grandview Area Small Study process that studied land use and traffic and 1 allowed for input. Director Houle said land use and transportation goes together and this study will involve the community development - planning department; however, it will not be a small area study like Grandview. Member Janovy said Southdale is important and expressed concerns that if the study is done in engineering without a global approach, they will not get what they need. Director Houle said it will not be done solely in engineering. He explained that the study will not include land use changes but instead will be focused on the roadway; for example, should a single lane become two lanes; should two lanes become four lanes, etc'. Member Bass said she agreed with this but there are in -fills and the area is changing. Director Houle said he will be incorporating the Living Streets Policy and will be looking at all modes of transportation. Member Bass said she wanted to be sure that it is comprehensive and that input is solicited from area residents. Chair Nelson noted that the France Avenue Intersection Enhancements project will be going on at the same time as the Greater Southdale Study is underway. DirectorxH6'u e_:said there are already some data available that they will be analyzing. r While there isn't a defined boundary for Southdale = should be placed at an intersection...' She said standards means something and in this case it is guidance that is being provided. She suggested rewording as 'The MNMUTCD provides guidance on when a Yield sign should be placed at an intersection...' Chair Nelson said it is a little upsetting to see the mention of a lack of sidewalk when the ETC recommended a sidewalk when the neighborhood streets were reconstructed but it was not approved. Section B. 2. Member Janovy asked if the 6 -hr parking would be enforced and Director Houle said yes. Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Braden to forward the Dec. 12 Traffic Safety Committee Report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motioii;carried. Meeting Schedule for 2013 The October meeting will be the 4th Thursday of the m Updates Student Members None. Bike Edina Task Force Received minutes of Nov. 8, 2012. Member Janovy,said the bike lanes and the presentation was forwarded to'•th41TC. ff �'illl�. pedestrians counts were done::,,. • 55th & Wooddale Bike count, Thurso Bike count. Wedn Ped count, Octoberl 2012: 54th and Halifax: Bike count, Saturday, Augus Bike count, Mon' ay, Octobi MEA weekend. Citysof Minneapolis did a presentation on their She reported that the following bike and i ;;2012: 197.'(approx. 21 hour video count -- missing 12:30 -3:30 p.m.) Ped count, August 16- "2'0012:129 Ped count, October 8, 2012: 314 hour video count) 2012: 106 (21 hour video count -- missing 1:00 -4:00 p.m.) 2012: 16 (24 video count) Living Streets Working Group Member Thompson handed out the minutes from their last meeting which lists the progress they have made so far. He said if the requested budget was not approved, that they would do a 'watered down' version similar to that of the City of Maplewood. He said member Janovy did a draft 'watered down' policy using the policy from City of Maplewood, City of Los Angeles and the work that has been done by BARR and HR Green. He said staff would take the lead with implementation of the final policy with the ETC providing support. Member Thompson, city engineer for the City of Maplewood, said they wrote their policy internally after getting input from a taskforce and stakeholders. He said it was used in 2011 and 2012 when they did street reconstruction. Member Braden recalled that City of North St. Paul also developed a Living Street Policy the same time as City of Maplewood but they did not approve a component of their policy for implementation. Member Thompson said it could be a cultural difference and education between the two cities. Member Braden said they need to be aware of this so the same thing doesn't happen in Edina. Member Thompson said they had an internal taskforce and then they included boards and commissions. He asked for feedback on moving forward. Member Franzen asked if the next step is to put together the classification and member Thompson said it would be to form another working group to review the draft polio before it goes to staff. Member Thompson said a new category was created called 'local connector'_ this is a local street that is a main artery into a neighborhood and it would have a sidewalk on:at ;least one side but no sidewalk on streets with lower level traffic. He said Member Janovy have alread ,. •:;,.; y identified some of the 'local connector' r'f` streets. He said they were not defined to give staff fle5Aility. • Transportation Options Working Group Received minutes of Nov. 13, 2012. l' Communications Committee — Draff'City of Edina Pedestrian and Bicycling Policy Statement Member LaForce said because of the committee's concern that City policies are scattered all over and residents might say they are making up things, they've created a view draft City of Edina Pedestrian and Bicycling Policy Statement to put.everythmg in`;one place'Member Braden asked what was meant by 'prioritizing transportation ;eight of way ( ROW).' Member LaForce said'they can use the ROW for anything; for example, Wood dale'Ave'nue does 7h6t only have to be-for parking. Member Janovy added that transportation ROW is for- transportation but theViu_ into challenges with things like landscaping in the ROW even though they are hot allowed and.this makes.it difficult for putting in sidewalk. This is in policy already said member;Janovy but it is:all overahe place Feed back`included the following: Member Franzen suggested citing where each policy came from and member Janovy said it was difficult to note where everything came fro rmbecause'theysre all related. Member Thompson asked .what difference another policy was going to make from all the other policies. Member Franzen said it looks "like 'a different policy but it sounds like they are trying to summarize all policies and if so, this should be'stated in the purpose. Regarding Policy Statement #5 where it talks about removing snow, member Braden asked if the City is going to remove snow for her. Director Houle said removing snow from sidewalk along county roads, state aid roads and around schools is common practice. Member Janovy thinks the City should remove snow from all sidewalks. This sentence will be reworded to reflect the current practice. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Nelson said most of the emails were talking about the bike lane on Wooddale Avenue. Member Janovy said one letter referenced Hibiscus Avenue and that she recommended sidewalk. She asked to have 4 the minutes changed to reflect the actual conversation. Member Janovy motioned to change the Oct 25 minutes and the motion was seconded by member LaForce. Member LaForce motioned to change the Oct 25 minutes as follow: in the Lake Edina section delete 'Member Jonovy recommended a sidewalk on Normandale Road to Hibiscus Avenue to Kellogg Avenue because of speed and volume and to connect with the Nine Mile trail that is coming soon.' And replace with 'Member Janovy suggested that staff evaluate the feasibility of sidewalks on Normandale Road and Hibiscus Avenue.' The motion was seconded by member lyer. All voted aye. Motion carried. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member LaForce asked if any safety upgrades had been done at the top of the ramp at Benton Avenue and Normandale Road, coming from southbound TH100. He said cars :doming up the ramp do not stop and he has experienced this at least once a month when biking. Directbe.Houle said he will take a look at the area. Member Janovy said there was a ROW easement vacatiofii'i ri'Benton, Avenue and she thought City Council did not want to give up any ROW until they were inventoried. Also, there were two public comments on :rf:r�;: traffic: one about United Health in Minnetonka, a d'the other about Pizzeria Lola at Sunnyside Road and France Avenue. She said to expect these at the TSC r, 4r�j% f�s'ry yprlr? �. Member Bass asked if there is a policy or exception for di ab,1ed'residents to remove;snow. Director Houle said they are required to remove their'snowand if they ca' - re are resources available. She asked if there were any feedback now that Tracy,Avefi06 (Vernon to Benton) is opened and Director Houle said not directly (the Mayor passed on feedback that: he hear d ;while campaigning - residents like it!) Member lyer asked if ther6,is'a formal processto get fo`edfack when projects are completed. Director Houle said no but recently, staff did a communication udit that -led to changes in how engineering communicates with resident's: ,He sai&igood indicator for him is how few residents attend the final assessment public hearing. Member I�er,•said he wodid :like to know how effective the commission has r" rf f r: been. He said,they hav l•r e been involved ih major projects and would like to know if they are making the right decisions. oe how theyfare perceived by residents, Member Janovy said the City Council gave the ETC the Wooddale Avenue bike lane projectyand said to make something happen and as for the neighborhood reconstruction projects, they've qnI been .involved for two years. Member lyer said he understands that the ETC does not make decisions but they do make recommendations and as a part of the process, he r _,,, would like to know wli'at people thin k;,,about their recommendations. Chair Nelson said the P. s approved by City Council. STAFF COMMENTS All of the neighborhood projects were approved by City Council on Dec. 11 and bids will be opened in February /March. Southwest LRT announced their preliminary engineers and they are Kimley Horn & Associates and AECOM. City Council approved the final development plans for 6500 France Avenue. At their expense, the developer will upgrade the intersection to match the intersections in the France Avenue Intersections Improvement project. Other developments around the Southdale area are: a new transit center by JCP is planned for next year; and enhanced crossing from the West End and Barnes and Noble across 69th Street 5 _.__..:.. _ . TRANSPORTATION,CO,MMIS$ION .. ` ATTENDANCE 6 . Work # of. ; Attendance , ,,;NAME > TERM J F: M :'A , M J'. .J - N D - Sessoorn' Mtgs.- %. Meetings/Work.r'fr, Sessions: 4/17/, Bass,' Katherine": ..2/1%2014 1 - 1 ' 1 Braden; Ann - 2/1/2014 1 " T YYf,: :,1, 1.9.3:... 7Z %> Franzen . ,Nathan 2/1/2013 4 .1: : 1 T �? :1 : }1 : A, 1 `.;,1• , 1 1 i s•, 1,1 :;: ,. _ .. 85 %, er, Su rya 2/1/2015 ...:, . 1 1. 1 1, .1. !1s. ,11' +f'r:•:r ,11f 1 ;1 }!f r. ; .,11;.' -- 92 %.. Jano Jennifer: 2)1/2014 1 1 r1 •,1 1 1., 1 .y 1 r f1 1 1 1f' ;, 13 '. J i_ 1r00% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 Nelson, Paul 2/14013 1 1 . 1 ' 1 f 1 `, �m ,1 1 . 1 x . 1 ' 4 Schwei er Steven student:._. 1 11, 1 1: "�r.,:, .1 1' f1•, :1 1 10,1;, i $jerks, :Caroline' 1r stu$entr {f* %1:.;1 1 f+ n 1 . A Thom son,-Michael. x/1/2013 1 �1.. 1" . 1. 1, r1s r1; 1. Whited; Courtney 2/1'/2015: 1` 1: 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1: 10 ,_ ., 83% 1 6 . NN at Lle&., Ay • JOBS To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. F. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Special Assessment Agreements — Richmond Hills Park Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to approve attached Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements for the sanitary sewer and water services for the Richmond Hills Park Roadway Reconstruction Area. Information / Background: Residents were required to upgrade their sanitary sewer service line from the mainline to the right -of -way line and were encouraged to upgrade the entire line to their house, as well as their water service line. Residents requested that the extra cost be added to the special assessment for the project. Our City Attorney prepared the attached agreements, which adds this cost to the final special assessment cost which will be known at the end of the project. Staff anticipates four additional agreements to be submitted to the City Council once the property owners sign the agreements. Attachments: 40 Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements I G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS\CONTRACTS \2012 \ENG 12-4 Richmond Hills \SS471 \Private Sewer Repairs\Item W.F. Approve Special Assessment Agreements.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 SPECIAL ASSESSI REEMENTS RICHMOND HILLS PARK NEIGh- i00D RECONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ENG 12-4 Agreement No. PO # Address Owner(s) Plumbing Company Pro ad Amt Final Amt Sewer Water 1 1039 5008 Richmond Dr Loretta G. Knab Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 3,775.00 $ 2,050.00 $5,825.00 2 1040 5520 Warwick PI DeEtta Goodmanson Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 8,350.00 $ - $8,350.00 3 1041 5033 W. 56th St Lori A. Sandviq Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 4.185.00 $ 2.395.00 $6.580.00 4 1042 5040 Yvonne Tert Jeffrey T. & Barbara A. Meyer Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water. 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 2,800.00 $ $2,800.00 5 1043 5053 Yvonne Tert Warren D & Joann G Snyder Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 230000 $ $2,300.00 6 1044 5112 Windsor Ave Todd & Mary Peterson Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3,725.00 $ 2,000.00 $5,725.00 7 1045 5021 Richmond Or Rennetta & Frank Bart Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 2,475.00 $ 2,095.00 $4,570.00 8 1046 5005 W. 56th St Alissa & Matthew Movem Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water. 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3,950.00 $ 2,000.00 $5,950.00 - 1047 6021 Yov me Terr Homeowner paid contractor. $ $ $0.00 9 1048 5032 W. 56th St Kristin & Christopher Moguist Hi hview Plumbinfl, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 2.995.00 $ 2.845.00 $5,840.00 10 1049 5037 W. 56th St Dawn & Christopher Rofidal Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 4,090.00 $ 2.175.00 $6,265.00 11 1050 5032 Windsor Ave Homeowner paid contractor. Ouverson Sewer & Water Inc. P.O. Box 247 Loretto MN 65367 12 1051 5029 W. 56th St Dorenne & William Just Jr Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3,275.00 $ 2,000.00 $5,275.00 13 1053 5009 Yvonne Tert Thomas Divine Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3,000.00 $ $3,000.00 14" 1054 5009 W; 56th'St Margaret, & DarMn.Dahl, ll Minneapolis &SuburbarvSewer.& Water, 323345th Ave. Sds Minnea Its iMN 55406' ;'. & __ -3,000.00; + $' _ 100000 , _ S., 000.00 15 1055 5041 Yvonne Tert Susan N Keator Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4.975.00 $ 1.950.00 $8,925.00 16 1057 5108 W. 56th St Scott L. Thorp Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 4,990.00 $ 2,195.00 $7,185.00 17 1058 5033 Nonnandale Ct. Mo an S & Susan M Brown Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 2,295.00 $2,295.00 18 1059 5024 Kent Ave William D Buss Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 2,850.00 $ 200000 $4,850.00 19 1060 5009 Kent Ave Sumner Adam & Jennifer Irene Musolf Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 4,210.00 $ 2:00010 $6,210.00 20 1061 5004 Kent Ave Mark L Van Sloun Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3.765.00 $ 2,000.00 $5,765.00 21 _ 10625021 Yvonne Terr David R-& Ann 'KFDieke - Minnea olis'&. Suburban. Sewer &Water 3233c45th-,AVe..So:.Minnea Iis,.MN.55406_ _ $_. 1'100:00;;$ 2200.00. _ ,$3'300,00 .22 1063 5036 W. 56th St Peter S & Tiffany G Bils Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 3,295.00 $ 2,095.00 $5.390.001 23 - 1064 5008 Yvonne Tert Kurt Knutson & Clara Case Minnea olis & Suburban Sewer & Water 3233 45th Ave. So. Minnea lis MN 55406 $ 3,250.00 $ 2,250.00 $5,500.00 24 1065 5105 W. 56th St Gregory H & Susan M Keane Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3,400.00 $ 2.850.00 $6,250.00 25 .. 1066 5036 Yvonne Tert _Kraig Knutson & BridgetTowey Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 5,980.00 $ 2.250.00 $8,230.00 26. 1068 5012 Richmond Or Christopher & Kathryn Jones Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 4,535.00 $ $4.535.00 27 1069 5532 Code Ave James Ankeny & Luanda Winter Duverson Sewer & Water Inc., P.O. Box 247 Loretto MN 55357 $ 4.300.00 $ $4,300.00 28, 1070 5040 Richmond Or Christopher M. Johnson Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 4,725.00 $ 2,445.00 $7,170.00 29 1071 5109 W. 56th St Judith & Thomas Forker Benjamin Franklin Plumbina, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4,825.00 $ 2,000.00 $6,825.00 30 1072 5025 Kent Ave Patrick & Ma aret Huber Minnea lis & Suburban Sewer & Water 3233 45th Ave. So. Minnea Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 632500 $ $6.325.001 31 1073 5020 Windsor Ray Nelson & Sally Dunn Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3138000 $ 2,350.00 $5 730.00 32 1074 5028 Richmond Or Colin & Abigail Rooney Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minnea Iis MN 55406 $ 5 210.00 $ $5,210.00 33" 1076 5104 Windsor Ave WlliemrStuert Steinke Minnea olisi8 Subrrban Sewer &Water 3233 4'Sth:Ave.!Sos Minnea olis !MN' 5406 I,$ 4 240.00; 2,000.601! 6 240100 34 1077 5024 Richmond Or John & Beverly Haw Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 4.800.00 1 $4,800.00 35 1078 5036 Richmond Or Nicholas Engels Hicitiview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 1,995.00 $1,996.00 36 1079 5036 Windsor Ave Janice Joshua Hi hview Plumbing, 4301 Hi hview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 $ 3,500.00 $3,500.00 37 1080 5100 Windsor Steven & Susan Me er Minnea lis & Suburban Sewer & Water 3233 45th Ave. So. Minnea Iis MN 55406 $ 5,260.00 $5,260.00 38 1081 5404 Richmond Lane Canto Wikman Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 $ 3,250.00 $ $3,250.00 39 1082 5004 Yvonne Tert 'Lynda Lorenz Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4,975.00 $ 3,650.00 $8,625.00 40 1083 5020 Nonnandale Ct James Ostlund Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4.165.00 $ 2,760.00 $6,925.00 41 1084 5020 Yvonne Tert Ryan Ballinger & Angie McConnell Benjamin Franklin Plumbina, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4.775.00 $ 2,335.00 $7,110.00 42 1 1088 5524 Code Gerald Pe lin Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4.950.00 $ $4,950.00 43 1087 5020 Richmond Or Homeowner paid contractor. 44 1088 5017 W. 56th St Ronald Prav Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4.975.00 $ 1,950.00 $6,925.00 45 1089 5025 Yvonne Ten Robert E Fitzsimmons Jr Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No Minneapolis, MN 55411 $ 4,800.00 $ 2,550.00 $735000 46 "_ ; 1090 5036- Normandale Ct ; Joanne $ Daniel Karsten _ _ Ben amin Franklin- Plunlbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minnea olis;'MN.55411_ -1,950.'00-, _ .-17:125'00 . $ 175,895.00 $ 67,635.00 $243,530.00 I��KA�1�U]I19 'Agreement not signed or needs to be resigned. °Srmn._ N PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND ks; SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 7UES day of \TUIY 16. , 20 - by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Loretta G. Knab, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 000, Block 01 of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 5008 Richmond Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the -Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider,; replacing water service line from the stop. box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS.FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 5 825.00!(the "Project Cost") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (tie "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase, Order No. 1039 was issued to. the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1039 for the amount of $5,825.00 The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pad, the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. , The City will assess the Project Cost. in the amount of 5 825.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the, Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager Tho foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 Id-, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was ac 20 Imo, by LOr, NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Loretta G Knab before me this �17�� day of ARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON____ Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center I4MBERLYALINDEEN "380 Corporate Center Curve NGTARYPUBLIC•M�NNESOTA IVCowd"ionEor6Jan.31,2015 igan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 =5000 RNK:srn - 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of oo-hbe vc , 20 I L by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and DeEtta Goodmanson, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 002, Block 002 of Edina Park, having a street address of 5520 Warwick PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of jg,350.00the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1040 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1040 for the amount of $8,350.00/ The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work. performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The. City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 8 350.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject_ Property._ The. Property Owner waiv-es_any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. -- -- - - - - - - -- - -- - -- -- -- - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors:and.assigns. This.Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA AN (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF 2 3l'- ) Lhe foregoing instrument WE , 20�1, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 4380 Corporate Center Curve 3gan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: DeEtta GoodmAWson COOAYVYa-ySa befo a me this day of AIi PUBLIC . NOTARY 2 SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARYKEW- NINNE M `Y fai6 Jf.31,'W5 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this_. day of 000IN , 20_1?� by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City'J Lori A. Sandvig, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 008, Block of Nylunds Place Edina, having a street address of 5033 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from. the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 6 580.00 (the 'Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1041 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1041 for the amount of 6 580.00;The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL. ASSESSMENT.. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 6 580.00 against the Subject Property., The, Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any, claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. _ §_429.081. - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINdIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 - Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) UU0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and'by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OFkke&AVit 11 The foregoing instrument 0. , 20a by DRAFTED BY: NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: C. �e((OX: �) , 'Q"Q' on A. Sandvig . . . .. - - - - -% - NOTARY PUBLIC CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association -317-&gandiale g KALLOW- Office Center WrARVF 8W. 1380 Corporate Center Curve �9►6p,gA,g�..� Eagan, Minnesota .55121 )lephone: (612) 452 -5000 NK:srn 2 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 2012 by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") a d Jeffrrey T. & Barbara A. Meyer, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the own ,-, of Lot 011, Block of Stows Yvonne Terrace Division, having a street address of 5040 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 2 800.0Cthe "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1042 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1042 for the amount of $2,800.00` The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 2 800.00�against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and,all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be. binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 (SEAL) CITY.OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN :. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. N�O_ARY PUBLIC: PROPERTY OWNER: T Barbara A. Meyer STATE OF MINNESOTA 11 (ss. COUNTY OF Rft ;n ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledaed before me this ft a4 , 20 12 , by q-�A day of DRAFTED BY: KRI$TINA 4 RUPORT CAMPBELL KNUTSON �,�pmypp,��pp - Professional Association - - - 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve igan, Minnesota 55121 alephone: (612) 452 -5000 %RNK:srn 2 Q I , PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of `' C , 20 k� ; by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Warren D & Joann G Snyder, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A-. - Property Owner is the owner of Lot 12, of Stows Yvonne Terrace Division, having a street address of 5053 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 2 300.0C((the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1043 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1043 for the amount of $2.300.0 The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 2 300.00,against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - - Stat._ §-429.081•- -- - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded againr' the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING ]DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA is James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC, PROPERTY OWNER: Warren .- oann G. Synder STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OFIkAW i/)) The foregoing instrument waX Mkled glp.e�f3e me this I fh da of 20 lc�, by 0 � I �e/ F y ( NO Y PUBLIC REBE= A CWVM JW DRAFTED BY: T CAMPBELL KNUTSON, wyopon,n81,�a Professional Association - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 317 Eagandale. Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve -agan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 k PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT QoAsaw AND aff®IN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT �_a�003 AGREEMENT made this -� day of 4Ar , 20-12, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Todd & Mary Peterson, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 5, Block 2 of Westchester Knolls, having a street address of 5112 Windsor Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of JEJL25.00 the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1044 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1044 for the amount of $5,725.00 The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 5 725.O(�against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the _ - _Subject_Prope.rty. - The- Property - Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. - -- - - - -- - — - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING) DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro.Boulevard •'Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov.952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952-826-0392 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) ums STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and. pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) J�,,,� COUNTY OF"11� (-N� ss. (),*The foregoing instrument , 20A by NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY Todd Peterson Mary Peters 8n befo EV'41WJAiiFW= is �� day of r'SJ r� - DRAFTED BY---.- - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association j SHARON M. AWSON 117 Eagandale Office Center ; 110TARYKSW- MINNEWTA 380 Corporate Center Curve M1►Gommissla�6Jan.31,T015 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT )8� n Q AGREEMENT made this 1 - day of , 20 jam, by and between the CITY _d OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Venetta n & Frank Barr; husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 07, Block 002 of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 5021 Richmond Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,570.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1045 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1045 for the amount of $4,570.00; The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. E �J 2. SPO AL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount .of $4,570.0 Against the Subject Property. The.Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12.4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - - - Stat. -§ 429;081-.--- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded againr' the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwRdinaMN.2ov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor �o OAF O�.�S (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Renn tta A Barr Frank Barr STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument waf, ackn 20, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON �rofessiona/ Association J17 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm OTARY PUBLIC day of SHARON M. ALLISO N0rAF1Y PUBLIC• MINN1r,= Yl► Connnbabn Jin. 9f.�261l�. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this r day of OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS a , 20 /_Z by and between the CITY ( "City ") ar d Alissa & Matthew Movern, husband and A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0, Block 1, of Nylurid's Place Division, having a street address of 5005 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property' ). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer & Water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 5 950.00�(the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1046 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1046 for the amount of 5 950.00!"'The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 5 950.00�gainst the Subject Property. The Project. Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City. Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - Stat. -§ 429.081._ ... - - - - - -. _. _. .... - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded againF' the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwF,dinaMNxeov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of C , by Jam -s B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ' (ss. COUNTY OF C l4 ) The regoing instrument 20 L?,-, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC ER: ARY P 2 me this ---, day of Sara J Nageffncn Notary POW State of Minnesota ' My COMM-EXP. 1 -31.15 X PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT �g. AND C U vOWOR`�`S SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of l. , 2011, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( „ City”) Nnd Kristin & Christopher Moguls., husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0', Block 1, of Edina Park Division, having a street address of 5032 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer & Water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 5 840.0�(the "Project Cost") from Hiahview Plumbing. 4301 Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1048 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1048 for the amount of 5 40.00 . The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 5 840.00Aainst the Subject Property.. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - - -- Sta.t - -§ 429.081.- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded again, the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA L'. "V (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City'of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss, COUNTY OF \ ) The foregoing instrument 20_11,, by NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Krist quist a C estop r quist before me this Nday nj NOTAW PUBLIC 2 U DRAFTED BY: JOHA A ARKEMA CAMPBELL KNUTSON NOTARypUSUC•MINNESOTA - - Professional Association - - - - - - - - - - - - My Conmisston Expires Jan. 31, 201 k - - -- - - -- -- -- - - -. - - -- -- - - - - -- 317 Eagandale Office Center 317 c 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 lJ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of C� , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") ar4&Dawn & Christopher Rofidal, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 9, Block 0 of Nylund's Place, having a street address of 5037 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the,Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,265.06; the "Project Cost ") from Hig-hview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1049 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1049 for the amount of 6 265.00,, The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 6 265.00 /against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject- Property. - The_Property Owner-waives- any-appeal- rights otherwise available pursuant _to Minn._ Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 -A.Ar FilinnMN anv . g57_R7F -0371 . Fax 952 -R26 -0392 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) Wl STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER- IL •• - r '• •. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF; ( ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /1 20 12; by &-. - 6�rr54i day of DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON 'rofessional Association .s17 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 W J LMDON MCKAY FUGMERG NOTARYPUBIJC _ MINNESOTA j W COMMISSION EXPIRES 01131117 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 14th day of May , 20 12, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Dorenne & William Just Jr, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 7, Block 1, of Nylund's Place Division, having a street address of 5029 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer & Water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: - 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,275.00Xthe "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1.051 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor Das submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1051 for the amount of $5,275.00./The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 5 275.00 /against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special. assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - $tat. §429.081. -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agains' the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager Tho foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 „ by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOT Y PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: orenne Just -uj & Q-2A,... 175 William Just Jr. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF Hennepin ) The foregoing instrument was ackn May , 20 12, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 380 Corporate Center Curve pagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn ed before Rq this 14th day of -14 IsALYSA MARIEWIESM NOTARY R"•li!IWA WCOkM IM N "aOIA1pd 0) I� PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 2012by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Thomas Divine (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 022, of Stows Yvonne Terrace Division, having a street address of 5009 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIESSI AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 3 000.00Jthe "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 451th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1053 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1053 for the amount of 11g030.0d The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3.000.0 Oagainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 1 -2-4,- including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING ]DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF I�e)A`'p The foregoing instrument q, , 20L;k, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 380 Corporate Center Curve Cagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm N TARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Thomas Divine befppr��e me this 1 day of D4P O AA • .�, NOTARY PUBLIC 2 SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commisram B#m Jan. 31.2015 S PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this IN day of N oo, 20 _k, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City" Susan N Keator, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0, of Stows Yvonne Terrace, having a street address of 5041 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the. right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer & Water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 6 925.00�the "Project Cost ") from Beniamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1055 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1055 for the amount of $6.925.0 0; The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6.926.0 gainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING 1DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) RECEIVED' JUN 5 2012 CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORK The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B.. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively tie N'layor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was , 201g:, by — DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 31 -7- Eagandale Office- Center - 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: u an N. Keator this 9,,(� day of 0 A . ' `. 2 LINDA K. HUGHES NOTARY PUBUC - NNH 0MA -- my Commission Expkes Jan. 31.03 16 PUBLIC. IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this s -day of �`� , 20, by. and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City" d Scott L. Thorp, (the "Property Owner").. RECITALS A. Property Owner is the.owner of Lot 5, Block 2 of Edina Park, having a street address of 5108 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe Ito the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the. stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 7 185.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place. Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1057 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1057 for the amount of 7 185.00�The City.is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 7185.0 Oagainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429,081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING: DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.eov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA AN (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF Q �,�( ss. The foregoing instrument was 1 '20A- by - - DRAFTED -BY: -- - - - - -- - - - - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn colt L Thorp before me this day of `-I � A -, r` 0 2 lie-------- owe ------ SHARON AA. AL1MN fttAFVFUqW- MWA3= A�B�?018 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT. AGREEMENT made this. ct . day: of , 20),� , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") 6M Morgan S & Susan M Brown, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 4, Block 1 of Normandale Court, having a street address of 5033 Normandale Ct., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner. replace the existing sewer service lines) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 2 295.00 "the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase. Order No. 1058 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1058 for the amount of 2 295.00'. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT... The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 2 295.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. _ The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING1DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) _►o STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF Sco-F+- ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 21 day of h a j , 2012 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 17 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 NOTARY P 2 VINODH L IATNAy NOTARY PUNC - MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01/31/18 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT OCT 1 1 201 AND CITY OF EDINA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT PUBLIC WORK j AGREEMENT made this /0 day of Qc,4 k e e , 20LZL_, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and William D Buss, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 12, Block 1 of Westchester Knolls, having a street address of 5024 Kent Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property .Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost-of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 4 850.06the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1059 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1059 for the amount of $4,850.Oe The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 4 850.00/against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural.and substantive o6jections.to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner, waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - Stat, .§ 429.0812 - - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING.. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and'the Property Owner's successors and. assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA la James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (. ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MIN ESOTA ) tit s. COUNTY OF ens 0a foregoing instrument was 4( , 20a, by J� DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUT_SON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curare Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: William D. Buss dged b : re me this O day of A^ WAS S eyo J 6. 2 SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARY PLMLIG- MINNESOTA i$► Canmisston 6�hes Jen. 9�, 2015 ECEIVED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT JUL JDEPT. AND CITY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT ENGIN AGREEMENT made this day of J U , 201ol_, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") Ad Sumner Adam & Jennifer Irene Musolf, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 025, of Edina Park, having a street address of 5009 Kent Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,210.00Xthe "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1060 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the ContractorPas submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No..1060 for the amount of $6,210.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6.210.0 gainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. _ .Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERIN(d DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA AN (SEAL) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument 20_12 , by NOTARY PUBLIC �Ir�ll`►��� - - Musolf acknowled _DRAFTED DRAFTED BY:_.. - - - - - - - - - - - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association .317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK'srn PU N me this of - CHERYL A ROSE NOTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 0113112015 G PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND I . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT �Ip�12 AGREEMENT made this D►NA day of�� 1 , 20 l2 ; by � �� a CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") an ark L Van Sloun, (the a wner' ). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 07, of Westchester Knolls, having a street address of 5004 Kent Ave; Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIE: AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 5 765.00�the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1061 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor Pas submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1061 for the amount of 5 765.00,The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5.765.0d gainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the- Property- Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWN R: Mark Van Sloun STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ✓� ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �_ day of 20 -V� by da-LX (ee, Ili -Slo��. NbTA71 PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association EMILY LOUISE CONNOLLY 317 Eagandale Office Center NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA 1380 Corporate Center Curve : MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01131117 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 ECEIVED� a� CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PUBLIC WORKS AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this aS day of MP-` 2Q t? by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Peter S & Tiffany G Bills, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0, Block 1, of Edina Park Division, having a street address of 5036 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4.. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer & Water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote: of 5 390.00�the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1063 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1063 for the amount of $5.390.00*' The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 5 390.00:against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 1.2-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGiDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City_Council. NOTARY PUBLIC • V21. • : Pete c i i sw� STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF, ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before-Me this C , 20j_a by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: - CAMPBELL KNUTSON - - - - - Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 0) day of ----------- -I` - - - JANE- M.TIMM - - - - - — ' .kOrilFtYPUBI.tC•NSlVl�9o1� ;IyCb IWWOn E*WAVL 3t; ZO15 A3 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT 70'A"'NO �r b�.0% AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT S AGREEMENT made thise day of , `20 by and. between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") d Kurt Knutson& Clara Case, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A.. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 03; of Stows Yvonne Terrace Division, having a street address of 5008 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to, the right -of -way line on the, Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer & Water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 5 500.00�the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So.; Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner. entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1064 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1064 for the amount of $5.500.0 The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,500.00 1 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12A. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat_ §. 429.081. - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be :binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGbEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 'Z,0 I' " day of 0C-roa VL , 20 1 L, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Kurt Knutson EIA"L� . aAxj-- Clara Case STATE OF MINNESOTA ) JOSHUA THOMASCMMEA NOTARY PUBUC- MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RENN�P N ) SS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01131117 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 12f- day of oc-TvQEt_ , 20 (Z, by Y- 0v-rS0N k�o t,L.kr -A eA c- NOTARY P BL - DRAFTED -BYa -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn i? 868 Vun w� � PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT �Yklcopoke4DIKN A ND i SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this o 00- day of 20 ly, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City' and Gregory H & Susan M Keane, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 013, of Nylund's Place Division, having a street address of 5105 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. . The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property. ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 6 250.00,(the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1065 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1065 for the amount of 19-2 50.00.` The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6.250.06 gainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat.- §- 429.081 . ... ... - - - - - - - - -- - - -.. - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING I)EPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of -20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ( ss. The foregoing instrument was 20� by_ -- - - DRAFTED -B- - -. - - - - - -- CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: P. Gr ory H. Keane (,, , M��. Susan M. Keane this, day of NOTARY PUBLIC 2 ;?s . PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this �- day of 0-eC,2 �/ , 201, by and between. the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Kraig Knutson & Bridget Towey, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner..of Lot 10, Block of Stows Yvonne Terrace, having a street address of 5036 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the. "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 8230.0 ''the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water. 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1066 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1066 for the amount, of 8230.00. °The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor: 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.'. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 8230.00 ,against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property._ The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING.. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA My (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBL STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF e4Ihf 1--- ) LThq foregoing instrument wap acknowl ged x(ejr-�^J , 20A, by DRAFTED BY: ER: re rr !b^ EIRTA -2 ME i n Of CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association SHARON M. AUJS014 K"' MNNEWM 317 Eagandale Office. Center ! "QTA-W MyCommi�ion6��esJ�.91,2015 1380 Corporate ,Cept&,Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 10 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of �� , 2p _I Z;-by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City ") and Christopher & Kathryn Jones, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0, of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 5012 Richmond Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the .trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested -that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,535.001the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1068 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1068 for the amount of 4 535.00'. T he City is in receipt of alien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. J SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 4 535.00 against the Subject Property'. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - Stat.. §.429.081..... - - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA IN James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) T~- ` oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this --E day of 203T by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager 4f the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF N&AOCIA ( ss. ) The foregoing instrument was , 20 J Z , by C NOTA PUBLIC Kathryn Jo before me this `ZO day of V: o � , . I-- . 1 , DRAFTED BY: - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - MEGAN L- PHIWPPI - - - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association W00MMk%ME6M01M11G. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 =5000 RNK:srn 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT C u�WOR`�S AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of JU/X,—z:' , 20 -by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and .James Ankeny & Lucinda Winter, (the "Property Owner'). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 00. Block 00 of Unplatted 33 117 21, having a street address of 5532 Code Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City. has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 124. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,300.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer & Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1069 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1069 for the amount of 4 300.00Jhe City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,300.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 124. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the - benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (n. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The-foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF t� ) --The foregoing instrument . l C yl Z , 2044, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: mes Ankeny 1-6eifida`Winter befor m this eA-1 -� PUBLIC y SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARY PUBLIC - MMNEWM My Commi�n Jen. 91, 2015 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT 4., AGREEMENT made this _ day of , 20 t by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") aM Christopher M. Johnson, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of .Lot 012, Block 01 of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 5040 Richmond Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 7170.00�the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1070 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1070 for the amount of ILL70.90,Jhe City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7,170.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject- Property.- The_ Property_ Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. - - - - - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952'- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY O �') The foregoing instrument 20_t), by DRAFTED BY: _ CAMPBELL KNUTS.ON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota '55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWf�NER: hristopher M. Johnson me this day of PUBLIC - - -- -- - -- - - - -- - - SHARON K AWSON AWPUBW-AI VNEWM MU �uni�lon E� , � _91,2015 2 0 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT C/ p?9al? AND Peel /C SCR vw SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _, day of ���� , 20j?-7-by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Judith & Thomas Forker, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A..., . Property Owner is the owner of Lot 014, of Nylund's Place, having a street address of 5109 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the" "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their Sewer & Water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 6 825.O6�the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a. contract with the. Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1071 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1071 for the amount of 6 825.0(, The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2./ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 6 825.00,against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City. Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. ' BINDING EFFECT; ,RECORDING. This .Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING I)EPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov. 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF' EDINA (SEAL) :►m STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Judith Forker 4. 7z-� Thomas Forker STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF a m 5 e ) _ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a �' day of , I u ne I, A. L Sc�l� can OTARY PUBLIC - DRAFT-ED -BY:. - -- - - - - - - - - - — - - -- CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association H,te,y Pubk 1.17 Eagandale Office Center mils e9ft 380 Corporate Center Curve ��•zota Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK :srn 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 1 g day of OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS 3° 20 I Z by and between the CITY Patrick & Margaret Huber, husband and A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0, Block 1 of Edina Park, having a street address of 5025 Kent Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 6 325.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1072 was issued to. the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1072 for the amount of 6 325.OQ; The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 6 325.Wagainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 124. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. St-at.- § 429.081. - - - - -- - - - - -. - - - -- 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the. Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ,' ) he foregoing instrument was u L. . , 20Z, by_ - - DRAFTED -BY CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 117 Eagandale Office Center 380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 .Telephone:. (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERWO W e. trick HwISer Margar Vuber before me this Ze day of ARY PUBLIC .JAMES'MICHAEL BAISCH +NOTARYPUBUC•MINNESOTA MY Conulds W Expires Jae. 31, 2014 f WEIVE6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT JUL 2 7 a W2 AND CITY OF EDINA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT PUBLIC WORKS/ AGREEMENT made this Z -7 day of 20 0-, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") anh Ray Nelson & Sally Dunn, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 010, Block 002 of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 5020 Windsor, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property''). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 5 730.00�the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1073 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1073 for the amount of $5,730.00 . The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. r SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 5 730.00,against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stet. 5419.-081 _ . - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA L' (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager 'SWISID PI ®V 19 2412 CITY �F OR F S PUg�ICw / The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 ; by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) Tl�e foregoing instrument 20_[l by NOTARY PUBLIC PRO TY OW%NER- R Nelson Sally Dudn NOTARY PUBLIC ---- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Drofessional Association SHARON AC ALUS0N 17 Eagandale Office Center WARY AUBX.NWIMM 1380 Corporate Center Curve my Cwmnkft 6Wm,IS,91,gp6 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT �OV o���A AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Q AGREEMENT made this day of I�Al 4 , 20tZ by and between the :CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City' and Colin & Abigail Rooney, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 015, Block 001 of Richmond Hills, having a street addross of 5023 Richmond Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public ;Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of gaLo.o6pe "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1074 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1074 for the amount of $5,210.00' The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. . 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.. The City will assess., the Project Cost in the amount of 6 210.060 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. - - Stat §429. -081: - -- - - - -- -- - -- -- - - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - -- - -- 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGiDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392. CITY OF EDINA J.� (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager ThA f ^r °going instrument was acknowledged before me this ' day of 20AI, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manag r of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to.the authority granted by its City Council. . " SHAWN R. MCLEOD Notary Public-Minnesota W CommWon E.xph•s Jan 31, 2015 : ^�,.�nnrtinn,nnnnnn+v�nl�M�wwvv STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was 20 V2a-, by ' DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional. Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve agan, Minnesota 55121 (elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC y r iowledge before me this "1'=` day of CA- 1W rl\ AAA.� NOTARY PUBLIC 2 u PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of . 0C 1tbLZr , 20101, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and John & Beverly Haw, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 016, Block 001 of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 502 Richmond Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,800.06 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement.. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1077 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order. No. 1077 for the amount of - 300.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 4 800.b0 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat §-429.08l.- - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING1DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 (SEAL) CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �y„- �� j ss. COUNTY O In T e foregoing instrument (O . , 20 `e , by DRAFTED BY: NOTARY PUBLIC RTY OWNER: John Haw Beverly Haw Towle edlf�ethis l day of AA 11��t Ct:pao NOTARY PUBLIC CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association SHARON A& ALLISON 317 Eagandale Office Center P�Bt1C•MWNE80TJA 380 Corporate Center Curve�.51.�16 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone:. (612) 452 -50.00 RNK:sm N 3s PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this � day of ���'�% , 20-12a, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Nicholas Engels, (the "Property Owner'). RECITALS A. Property. Owner is the owner of Lot 013, Block 001 of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 5335 Richmond Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the- "Subject Property"* B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4.. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 1 995.00';(the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, 4301 Hiahview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1078 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1078 for the amount of $1.995.0 0The. City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2./ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $11,995.00 gainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGI DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 [2-- , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City; Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • ( COUNTY O ss. (�) �WtQ Th foregoing instrument , 20-L;�_, by DRAFTED BY: ARY PUK16 PROPERTY OWNER: C is olas Ehdels ed before me this � day of J NOTARY PUBLIC CAMPBELL KNUTSON _ Professional Association_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ SHARON M. ALLISON 317 Eagandale Office Center -IA�ESM . 1380 Corporate Center Curve wh►caumiai ekes. 31, 2�6 c.agan, Minnesota 55121 31ephone: (612) 452 -5000 kNK:srn 2 � 0 PUBLIC] PROVEMENT AND �Q o Wok SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT w AGREEMENT made this 0 day of a�01� , 201!4_, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (" C.ity ") and Janice Joshua, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property. Owner is the owner of Lot 014, Block 002 of Richmond Hills,. having a street address of 5036 Windsor Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC. IMPROVEMENT... The Owner received a quote.of $3,500.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Hiahview Plumbing, 4301 Hiahview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1079 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1079 for the amount of 3 500.00 The. City is in receipt of a lien waiver for-the work performed and will pay the Contractor. ?: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess.. the Project Cost in the amount of 3 500.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements, and any claim that the .assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Janie Joshua STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) 0 , T e regoing instrument was acknowledged 2 by c`�a,�r`r .-- DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 =elephone: (612) 452 -5000 kNK:srn �nc.7r►A rANe MYCOM 0!V I INN 1 1S me this I(D day of 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of �' , 20 /� by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and teven & Susan Meyer,. husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0, Block 002 of Westchester Knolls, having a street address of 5100 Windsor, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 5 260.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1080 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1080 for the amount of $5,2611, 0.00.-The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 5 26�OO,against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING1DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 61 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) - (ss. COUNTY O ) A foregoing instrurppnt was 20 by CAMPBELL Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Ste n Meyer tWiazYMeyer C Grubtch Y PUBLIC OTARY PUBLIC ESOTA 2 day of I t PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND RECEIVED. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT JUL 1 7 2012 `pUBUC WORKS AGREEMENT made this day of , 20�, by and the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") a Carrie Wikman, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 006, Block 003 of Richmond Hills, having a street address of 5404 Richmond Lane, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 3 250.00,(the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 451th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1081 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor, has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1081 for the. amount of $3,250.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 3 2.` SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 250.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING bEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF � nep IN ) The foregoing instrument was {,L j (A , 20a, by —� DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center - -- 1380- Corporate- Center Curve - Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Carrie ikma before me this day of ARY PUBLIC 2 ■ JANA MARIE LARSON NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA My CoAanission Expires Jan. 31,20 14 r AAOVVWK 39 PUBL' IC IMPROVEMENT RDECEE �Vajlc AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT c IVOW AGREEMENT made this day of 3ol''1 • , 20 13 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Lynda Lorenz, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 0, Block 0 of Stows Yvonne Terrace, having a street address of 5004 Yvonne Tern Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT.. The Owner received a quote of $8.625.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin Plumbing. 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1082 was issued: to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order. No. 1082 for the amount of 8 625.00The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. ✓ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $8,625.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not- limited to hearing requirements and...any claim .that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN:gov. 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952. 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC r RICHARD D. BORLADJR. Notary PubliSTATE OF MINNESOTA state of Minne) ; p1°S My Commission E( SS. January 31 , 2 COUNTY OF �, ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y". day of 20 l3, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional-Association - 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 40 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 5 day of 20JI, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and James Ostlund, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 006, Block 002 of Normandale Court, having a street address of 5020 Normandale Ct, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC. IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 6 925.00 jthe "Project Cost ") from Beniamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order .No. 1083 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1083 for the amount of 6 925.00 The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,925.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public_ Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim . that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF W IIN ( ss. ) The foregoing instrument was , 20 1 by NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWWW James Ostlund ed before me this -5 day of 0-1uhlo DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON - Professional - Association - 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve 'Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm 2 a KRISTINE ERVASTI NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA - �, My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2013 �l PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this -? day of JGt-O\ • , 201r , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Ryan Ballinger & Angie McConnell, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 006, Block 00 of Stows Yvonne Terrace, having a street address of 5020 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). . B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and wafter and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 7110.00Xthe "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement, and Purchase Order No. 1084 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1084 for the amount of $7.110.00, The City is in receipt of alien waiver for the work performed and will pay. the Contractor. 2. / SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.'. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7.110.00 against the Subject Property.. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. -Stat. § 429:081:- - - - - 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement. shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement maybe recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF'EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager RECEIVED JAN 8 2013 CITf'OF EDINA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Ryan Ballinger NANCY L. JAECKELS . 014 A F1 NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1- 31.2014 gngie cConnell STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF h ) The foregoing instrument was ackn �S O1 h , 20 , by a DRAFTED BY:-- KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn ore me this day of ARY PUREIC/ / 0) LSTACL MUNSTERJ31,2013 Notary Public I -. Minnesota - - - Commission Expires JUN 4A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of JQ''�' , 2013 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Gerald Peplin, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 002, Block of Richmond Hillis 3rd Addn, having a street address of 5524 Code, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on, the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE. PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,950.00 �the "Project Cost ") from Benoamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1086 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1086 for the amount of 4 950.00 The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.. The City will assess the Project .Cost in the amount of $4,950.00 Against the Subject Property.. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property, Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor I Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Dahl II STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HQ ^) The foregoing instrument TA ^ ' , 201, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association .317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC acknowledaeo,beforg me this day of it NOTARY PUBLIC 2 SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA WY Commission EVhi Jm1. 31, 2015 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor I Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Dahl II STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HQ ^) The foregoing instrument TA ^ ' , 201, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association .317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC acknowledaeo,beforg me this day of it NOTARY PUBLIC 2 SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA WY Commission EVhi Jm1. 31, 2015 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this � day of ®uC6Q-r , 20AA, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Ronald Pray, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 004, Block 00 of Nylund's Place, having a street address of 5017 W. 56th St, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement,against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: i 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 6 925.00,(the "Project Cost ") from Beniamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1088 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contracto$r has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order. No. 1088 for the amount of $6,925.00.,The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed. and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 6 92e.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any, claim that the. assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 I.., CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) ill STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • (ss. COUNTY OF Q. (" ) Tie foregoing instrument ©`k d=xs , 20_1 by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: a 4,Qj Ronald Pray before me this Ili day of _ _ Y IFA _v � so Me NRY PUBLIC 2 -- - - - - 'SHMOM M. ALLISON - - IVIdrAFN PUBtlC • IMF.SOT� 1lpComm ai6rp6eaJain.B MMS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 20 �, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Robert E Fitzsimmons Jr, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 018, Block OO.of Stows Yvonne Terrace, having a street address of 5025 Yvonne Terr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service, line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 7 350.0 Jthe "Project Cost ") from Beniamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3rd St No, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1089 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1089 for the amount of 7 350.00.,The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 7 350:'00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. _ The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY WNER: �� S Robert E. Fitzsim ffions, Jr. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • (ss. COUNTY o h I� ) The oregoing instrument was ck owle ed fore me this day of 20�, by o f SPA A, a S r",*A i A IT - ARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON - Professional- Association- - - - - - SHARONALALUS01+1 — - 317 Eagandale Office Center N0TAWrj8W -IIYt GlEWR 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm I. t� REPORT / RECOMMENDATION JAM11TZ%V-, �roRerosu� � • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV.G. From: Ross Bintner P.E. Action Environmental Engineer Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013-11 Purchase of Easement and Condemnation of Land for Removal of Lift Station No. 1. Action Requested: Authorize Mayor to sign attached resolution authorizing purchase of utility easements and proceeding with condemnation of land for the removal of Lift Station No. 1. Information / Background: Located in the narrow boulevard south of Sunnyside Road between 4015 and 4043, lift station I (LS 1) serves 50 properties and is at the end of its useful life. In 2009 City staff investigated different options for rehabilitation, replacement or abandonment of LS 1. The attached study by Barr Engineering details potential lift station consolidation in the Morningside neighborhood. The option to abandon LS I and directionally drill a gravity line (option 1.1 $73,000 capital cost) was compared to the option of rehabilitation of the lift station (option 'rehab LS I' $100,000 capital cost.) The preliminary estimate for directional drilling and abandonment of LS I and replacement with a gravity pipe was identified as the most cost effective option for this location. The preliminary estimate for redirecting the flow does not include easement costs, but shows a reduced initial capital cost. This option also reduces the amount of lift stations City staff must monitor and maintain thereby reducing long term operations and maintenance costs. The option to abandon LS I and directionally drill a gravity line was preliminarily designed in 2009. The option benefitted nearby residents by removing a control and electrical box that sits in the boulevard, and proposes directional drilling, which is a low impact approach to pipe installation that avoids the impact and. tree removal required by open cut methods. In 2009 City staff attempted to secure easement agreements for the project. Three of the four owners stated no opposition to the proposed project, but staff failed to gain agreement for easement acquisition from one owner. Since 2009, one of the three properties not opposing project has changed hands. In late 2012, Evergreen Land Services was retained to provide land acquisition consulting services. The attached easement description shows the proposed property easements along the directional drilling City of Edina • 4801 W. 506 St • Edina, MN 55424 alignment. The easement is 10' in width and straddles the property line, 5' wide on each side. Appraisals for each of the four properties have been complete by Evergreen Land Services. Evergreen and has contacted the 4 property owners and presented appraisals and contingent offers commensurate with the appraised value .As' in 2009, three of the four owners seem willing to grant easement, with the same property owner'still uncertain (4544 Meadow Rd). Since the project cannot move forward without these easements, this action authorizes easement acquisition through purchase, and authorizes condemnation if an owner is unwilling to sell. Attached are summary pages for the three properties indicating willingness to grant easement, and the full appraisal for the fourth property. The total cost of easement if each of the properties is willing to sell would be $31,200. This project is identified in the 2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Program for 2013 as UT -03 -010 Remove Lift Station No. 1. After easements are acquired, project final design and bidding will take place, and a bidder and contract will be forwarded for Council approval. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013-11 Easement Map "Exhibit A" Morningside Area Lift Station Elimination Cost Estimate and Option 1.1 Map Appraisals 0 G:\PW\CENTRALSVCS\ENG DIV \PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \LS44 LS No. 1 \ADMIN \130122 Consider Res No. 2013 -11 Purchase of Easement and Condemnation of Land for Removal of Lift Station No. l .docx RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -11 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF EASEMENT AND CONDEMNATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina does hereby determine that it is necessary for a public use and purpose to acquire utility easement and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A ", for purposes in connection with Lift Station 1 Removal Project (Project No. LS -44); and, WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have and will continue to work with the property owners to acquire the necessary easements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that development and construction conditions related to the area make it necessary to acquire utility easement for the property as soon as possible in order for the project to proceed in an efficient, cost effective and expeditious manner. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina: 1. That the City Attorney is authorized to commence eminent domain proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117 to acquire the necessary easements and /or fee title identified on the attached Exhibit "A ", subject to engineering modifications, if needed. 2. That the City Attorney is authorized to acquire the necessary property interests pursuant to the "quick take" provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 117.042. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the acquisition of the necessary property interests. 4. The City is in the process of obtaining appraisals of the property being acquired. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to approve the appraisals and make formal offers to the property owners subject to City. Council's final approval. Dated: January 22, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of '20 City Clerk EDINA PUBLIC WORKS & PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY 7450 Meiro Boulevard a Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov o 952 - 826 -0376 o Fax 952 - 826 -0392 o Exhi 't A 6 �O P � \ \ � k"', 7 � p 5 ° shcro 3.00 4015 \ 50 \ 4043 V50 1.00 9 5.00 49 0 \ AUD SUB \0 161 9 e 48 p 'p 9 M C lain ° p \ \ 9p 1 \ �p 5.0 I \ p lausman \ \ 0 54 7p I \/ 52 53 \o` 51 \ \ ? 4544 ° ( O \ OP y — • 0T A"$,� `C 10.00 �L<v TRACT A RLSNO111 20.00 4600 10.00 Veld an An easement for utility purposes across Curve Avenue; An easement for utility purposes across Lots 50, 52, An easement for utility purposes across Lots 52, 53 and 54, vacated, Lot 50, Auditor's Subdivision No. 161, according 53 and 54, Auditor's Subdivision No. 161, Auditors Subdivision No. 161, according to the recorded plat to the recorded plat thereof. Hennepin County, Minnesota. according to the recorded plat thereof, thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o Said easement is described as follows: Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said easement is described as follows: Said easement is described as follows: The southwesterly 5.00 feet of the following described The southwesterly 5.00 feet of the following described property: property: The northeasterly 5.00 feet of the following described That part ofsaid Lots 52, 53 and 54, lying northeasterly ofa That part of Lot 7, Block 2, Berkeley Heights, Hennepin property; line 51.00 ft northeasterly of and parallel with the i County Minnesota and also the adjacent 1/2 of Curve The southwesterly 51.00 feet of said Lot 50 and that southwesterly line of Lot 50, extended southeasterly across 9 Avenue; vacated, lying southwesterly ofa line parallel part of said Lots 52, 53 and 54, lying between the said Lots 52, 53 and 54 with and distant 53.00 ft southwesterly from the southwesterly line of said Lot 50 extended northeasterly line of said Lot 7 and the same extended. southeasterly and a line parallel with and 51.00 feet And that part of said Lot 50, lying northeasterly of the northeasterly from said southwesterly line of said Lot southwesterly 51.00 ft of said Lot 50 50 extended southeasterly. A 10.00 foot easement for utility purposes across Lot 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 319, A 10.00 foot easement for utility purposes across Tract A, Registered land according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. e The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Survey No. 0111, Files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Commencing at the northeast comer of said lot 7; thence southwesterly, along the easterly line of said The centerline of said easement is described as follows: lot 7 a distance of 10.00 ft; thence northwesterly along a line whose projection intersects the north line Commencing at the northeast comer of said Tract A; thence southwesterly of said lot 7 with the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly line of lot 50, Auditor's Subdivision Commencing the ing at t line of said Tract o a distance of; then a flk to rite no. 161, Hennepin County Minnesota, a distance of 31.55 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence northwesterly distance of 6.10 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection of the beginning of the line to be described; thence northwesterly a distance of north line of said lot 7 with the southeasterly extension ofa line parallel with and 51.00 feet 25.5 feet, more or less, to a point on the north line of said Tract A, said point being a distance of 31.55 Feet northwesterly of the northeast comer northeasterly from the southwesterly line of said lot 50, said centerline there terminating. of said Tract A, and said centerline there terminating. Morningside Area Lift Station Elimination - City of Edina, flAN Barr Project #23/27 - 1029 Feasibility Cost Estimate 4/29/2009 Option 1.1 - Remove LS01, directional drill gravity sewer to LS11 sewershed on Meadow Road (MH 223) Option 7.1 - Remove LS07, gravity sewer on Grimes Ave to new (deeper) LS at corner of Grimes Ave and 42nd St Option 7.2 - Remove L807, gravity sewer on Grimes Ave and park space to new (deeper) LS at Grimes Ave and 42nd St Option 8.1 - Remove LS08, gravity sewer on Lynn Ave and 42nd St to new (deeper) LS at corner of Grimes Ave and.42nd St Option 82 - Remove LS08, gravity sewer to new (deeper) LS at corner of Grimes Ave and 42nd St Option 7/8.1 - Remove LS07 and LS 08, common gravity sewer on Grimes Ave to new (deeper) LS at Grimes Ave and 42nd St Option 7/8.2 - Remove LS07. and LS 08, common gravity sewer in park space to new (deeper) LS at Grimes Ave and 42nd St Cost Cmmnarisnn;nf °()nfinna Estimate Qualifications: • Feasibility level estimate - not for bidding "Assuming good soil conditions • Necessary easements: acquired by City of Edina . . • Rehab estimates based on budget cost provided by Edina P: \Mpls\23 MN\27\23271029 Morningside Lift Station Study \WorkFiles \LS elimination - preliminary cost estimate_dan.xis Lift Stations Option # Eliminated: New /rebuild Total Estimated capital cost Estimated O &nA:Cost 30.Year PV 1.1 1 0 0 $ 73,000 $ - $ 73,000. 7.1 1 2 2 $ .653,000 $. 12;000.. $ 890;000' 7:2. 1 2 2 $ 598,000 $ 12,0.00 .$ 830;000 8.1' 1 2 2 $ - 785,000 $ 12,000. $ _ - 1,020,000 8.2 1 2 2 $ 627,000 $ 12,000 $ 860,000. 7/8.1 2 1 1 $ 795,000 $ 6 1000.. $ 910,000 7/8.2 2 1 1 $ 718,000 $ 6,000 1 . 840;000 . Rehab LS1 0 1 1 $ . 100,000 $ 6,000_ : $ 220 ;000 Rehab LS2, LS7, & LS8 0 3 3 1 $ 300,000. $ 18,000..,$ _ 650,000 Estimate Qualifications: • Feasibility level estimate - not for bidding "Assuming good soil conditions • Necessary easements: acquired by City of Edina . . • Rehab estimates based on budget cost provided by Edina P: \Mpls\23 MN\27\23271029 Morningside Lift Station Study \WorkFiles \LS elimination - preliminary cost estimate_dan.xis Morningside Area Lift Station Elimination - City of Edina, MN Feasibility Cost Estimate Option 1.1 - Remove LS01, directional drill gravity sewer to LS11 sewershed on Meadow Road (MH 223) Barr Project #23/27 -1029 4/29/2009 Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extension Notes Pre-Construction Negotiate and Purchase Easements LS $ - Easement between houses and on vacant lots Mobilization 1 LS $ 9,739 $ 9,739 20 % of work items Demolition Remove Bituminous Pavement 180 SY $ 5 $ 900 sawcut, remove bituminous Decommission Existing L.S. 1 LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000 remove equipment, fill sump, new outlet, abandon FM Utility Worts Directional Drilling, 8" HDPE gravity 380 LF $ 65 $ 24,700 avg slope 2.35% Resolve Utility Conflicts 1 LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Restoration Curb and Gutter 20 LF $ 26 $ 520 Site Restoration, Sod 25 SY $ 15 $ 375 Bituminous Pavement 180 SY $ 40 $ 7,200 base course, bituminous surface Construction Subtotal $ 58,434 Contingency, 25% $ 14,609 125 % of Const. subtotal Total Estimated Capital Cost (Feasibility Level $ 73,000 Estimated Annual O&M 30 Year Present Value (1=3 %) Qualifications: Assuming good soil conditions Necessary easements acquired by City of Edina Assuming existing Lift Station 11 can handle additional flow H $ 73,000 RolME • ®� ®����� ��� • � ;}� IT o Option 1.1 o Storm Catch Basin Parcels OPTION 1.1 0 Study Area Sanitary Lift Stations o Storm Manhole Sanitary Lift Station Storm Gravity Momi anon Area N Lift Station Study O Sanitary Manhole - - - Watermain O City of Edina Sanitary Pressurized Main 2 -ft surface contour o 150 300 soo Feet DRAFT Sanitary Gravity Main - 10 -ft surface contour SUMMARY OF SALIENT DATA UNCOMPLICATED ACQUISITION APPRAISAL Owner: Ernie S. Ashcroft Zoning: R1 — Single Dwelling Unit District Property 4015 Sunnyside Road Present Use: Residential Homesite Address: Edina, MN 55424 City's Land Use Plan: Residential Highest and Best Use: Before — Single Family Homesite After - Single Family Homesite COMPENSATION FOR PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT: Compensation for Sanitary Sewer Easement: 674 sf of unencumbered land @ $ 39.92/sf X 25% loss in value $ 6,726 Compensation for Trees /Shrubs within Easement: None will not be removed or damaged) $ 0 Severance Damage: None $ 0 Compensation for Improvements within Acquisition: None $ 0 Total Compensation (rounded) $ 6,800 Douglas K. Johnson, SR/WA Patricia J. Nolan MN Certified General Real Property MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4001052 Appraiser License No. 20243478 Date: October 22, 2012 Evergeen Land Services 2 SUMMARY OF SALIENT DATA UNCOMPLICATED ACQUISITION APPRAISAL Owner: Christopher & Carolyn McClain Zoning: R1 — Single Dwelling Unit District Property 4043 Sunnyside Road Present Use: Residential Homesite Address: Edina, MN 55424 City's Land Use Plan: Residential Highest and Best Use: Before — Single Family Homesite After-- Single Family Homesite COMPENSATION FOR PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT: Compensation for Sanitary Sewer Easement: 1533 sf of unencumbered land @ $ 31.63/sf X 25% loss in value $ 12,122 Compensation for Trees /Shrubs within Easement: None will not be removed or damaged) $ 0 Severance Damage: None $ 0 Compensation for Improvements within Acquisition: None $ 0 Total Compensation (rounded) $ 12,200 V. 4,wm Douglas K. Johnson, SR/WA MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4001052 Date: October 22, 2012 Patricia J. Nolan MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 20243478 Evergeen Land Services 2 ;SUMMARY OF_ SALIENT _DATA UNCOMPLICATED ACQUISITION APPRAISAL Owner: Mark Veldman Zoning: R1 — Single Dwelling Unit District Property 4600 Meadow Road Present Use: Residential Homesite Address: Edina, MN 55424 City's Land Use Plan: Residential Highest and Best Use: Before — Single Family Homesite After - Single Family Homesite COMPENSATION FOR PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT: Compensation for Sanitary Sewer Easement: 255 sf of unencumbered land @ $ 39.56/sf X 25% loss in value $ 2,522 Compensation for Trees /Shrubs within Easement: None will not be removed or damaged) $ 0 Severance Damage: None $ 0 Compensation for Improvements within Acquisition: None $ 0 Total Compensation (rounded) $ 2,600 Q,.A, Douglas K. Johnson, SR/WA Patricia J. Nolan MN Certified General Real Property MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4001052 Appraiser License No. 20243478 Date: October 22, 2012 Evergeen Land Services 2 UNCOMPLICATED ACQUISITION APPRAISAL APPRAISAL OF PROPERTY OWNED BY: EDWARD W. CLAUSMAN PROJECT: SUNNYSIDE LIFT7STATION PREPARED FOR: CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MN 55.424 (� _ ... 4 ` EFFECTIVE DATEvOF APPRAISAL- PREPARED ' PREPARED BY: DOUGLAS K. JOHNSON, SR/WA AND PATRICIA NOLAN EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES, INC. 4131 OLD SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 201 EAGAN, MN 55122 ----------- ... - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - -- - -. SUMMARY Of SALIENT DATA UNCOMPLICATED ACQUISITION APPRAISAL Owner: . Edward Clausman Zoning: R1 — Single Dwelling Unit District Property 4544 Meadow Road Present Use: Residential Homesite Address: Edina, MN 55424 City's Land Use Plan: Residential Highest and Best Use: Before — Single Family Homesite After - Single Family Homesite COMPENSATION FOR PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT: Compensation for Sanitary Sewer Easement: 937 sf of unencumbered land @ $ 40.95/sf X 25% loss in value $ 9,593 Compensation for Trees /Shrubs within Easement: None will not be removed or damaged) $ 0 Severance Damage: None $ 0 Compensation for Improvements within Acquisition: None $ 0 Total Compensation (rounded) $ 9,600 Douglas K. Johnson, SR/WA Patricia J. Nolan MN Certified General Real Property MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4001052 Appraiser License No. 20243478 Date: October 22, 2012 Evergeen Land Services 2 UNCOMPLICATED APPRAISAL ACQUISITION Client and User of City of Edina. A secondary user of the appraisal is the landowner who Appraisal: will receive a copy of the appraisal. Owner: Edward W. Clausman Property Address: 4544 Meadow Road, Edina, MN 55424 Tax Parcel No.: 07- 028-24 -44 -0150, 07- 028 724 -44 -0034 & 18- 028 -24 -11 -0016 Size of Larger Approximately 29,305 sf or 0.673 acres (per Hennepin County Records) Parcel: Legal' Description of Lengthy metes and bounds description within the following: Part of Lot Larger Parcel: 7, Auditor's Subdivision No: 319; Part of Lots, 52, 53 and 54 of Auditors Subdivision No. 161 and part of Lot 1 of White Oak 7t' Addition, all in Hennepin County, MN Assessor's Tax Parcel No. Land Value Building Value Total Information: (Payable 2013,value as of January 2012) 07.028.24.44.0150 $ 271,200 $ 440,800 $ 712,000 07.028.24.44.0034 $ 166,400 $ 0 $ 166,400 18.028.24.11.0016 $ 200 $ 0 $ 200 Totals $ 437,800 $ 440,800 $ 878,600 Present Use: Single family homesite Scope of Valuation: Prepare an uncomplicated acquisition valuation report for the proposed acquisition utilizing comparable land sales. Since the sewer pipe will be installed via horizontal boring, the house, yard and trees will not be affected by the acquisition and therefore the valuation problem is a function of land value. Comparable land sales will be used to estimate the value of the subject lot (land) in the before situation. Compensation for the acquisition will be calculated based on the lot value per sf times the number of sf times a percentage of the fee value. The City has indicated that any future damage to surface improvements and trees /landscaping would be compensated at the time of future damage, if and when that occurs. Property Interestto 937 sf of permanent utility easement for directional boring of a sanitary Be Acquired: sewer pipe. see acquisition drawing) Zoning: Zoning is "R1 — Single Dwelling Unit District ". Minimum lot size is 9,000 sf. Highest and Best Single Family Homesite Use: Landowner Contact Douglas K. Johnson visited the site on September 26, 2012, and & Date of performed the inspection. Landowner could not accompany the Inspection: appraiser on the inspection of the property. 5 Year Sales History There have been no sales or listings on the subject property in the last 5 of Subject Property: ears Date of Value: September 26, 2012 Just Compensation $ 9,600 Evergeen Land Services '� a CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISERS We, hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: • That an inspection of the subject property (land) was made by Douglas K. Johnson on September 26, 2012. The owner of the parcel, Mr. Clausman, was not able to accompany the appraiser on the inspection but was contacted by the acquisition agent. • That the property being appraised and the comparables utilized in this appraisal are as represented in the appraisal. • The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. • We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. • Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. • Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. • Our analyses; opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. • No one else provided significant appraisal assistance to us in the preparation of this appraisal. • That any decrease or increase in the fair market value of real property prior to the date of valuation caused by the public improvement for which such property is acquired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for such improvement, other than that due to physical deterioration within the reasonable control of the owner, was disregarded in determining the compensation for the property. • Based upon this independent appraisal and the exercise of our professional judgment, it is our conclusion that the just compensation for the acquisition described in this appraisal is $ 9,600 as of September 26, 2012. Date: October 22, 2012 Douglas K. Johnson, SR/WA Patricia J. Nolan MN Certified General Real Property MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4001052 Appraiser License No. 20243478 Evergeen Land Services 4 - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - -- PURPOSE OF THE ACQUISITION AND VALUATION The purpose of this acquisition is to acquire a permanent utility easement for the construction of an underground sewer pipeline from Sunnyside Road to Meadow Road across the subject property. The City will use horizontal boring to install an 8" diameter sanitary sewer at a depth of up to 25 feet below the surface of the easements on four properties. The use of horizontal boring will alleviate surface damage and tree /landscaping damage. The purpose of this valuation is to establish the amount of just compensation due the owner of the subject property for the proposed acquisition stated herein. The just compensation estimated from this valuation will be used in the offer to the landowner. ----- - - - -- _... - COMPETENCY OF APPRAISERS Douglas K. Johnson, SRWA, and Patricia Nolan have the knowledge and experience to complete this appraisal assignment competently and in compliance with USPAP. Refer to the Appraisers' Qualifications in the Addenda of this report for further details. EXPOSURE AND MARKETING TIME The following definitions are taken from The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fourth Edition, Appraisal Institute: Exposure Time: The estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal; a retrospective estimate based upon an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market. Exposure time is always presumed to occur prior to the effective date of the appraisal. The overall concept of reasonable exposure encompasses not only adequate, sufficient and reasonable time but also adequate, sufficient and reasonable effort. Exposure time is different for various types of real estate and value ranges and under various market conditions. Marketing Time: The time it takes an interest in real property to sell on the market subsequent to the date of appraisal. Reasonable market time is an estimate of the amount of time it might take to sell an interest in real property at its estimated market value during the period immediately after the effective date of appraisal; the anticipated time required to expose the property to a pool of prospective purchasers and to allow appropriate time for negotiation, the exercise of due diligence, and the consummation of a sale at a price supportable by concurrent market conditions. Marketing time differs from exposure time, which is always presumed to precede the effective date of the appraisal. Exposure time of six to twelve months would be required to sell the subject property, based on the value stated herein. Marketing time, including due diligence and closing is also estimated at six to twelve months. Evergeen Land Services 5 MARKET VALUE DEFINITION Market value as utilized in this appraisal report conforms to the following definition obtained from Pages 177 -178 of The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fourth Edition. The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby. 1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interest; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market, 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. The price represents a normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concession granted by anyone associated with the sale. Unless otherwise noted in the appraisal report, market value shall represent cash equivalent terms where the seller receives all cash for their interest. The property may be financed at typical market terms under this definition. APPRAISERS' HISTORY WITH SUBJECT PROPERTY The appraisers have not performed any previous appraisal work on the subject property. Evergeen Land Services 6 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is a residential home site situated on Meadow Road in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The property is located just west of France Avenue about 1 mile north of the 50th and France Avenue business center. The property is described as follows: Lot Size: 29,305± sf or 0.673± acres three tax parcels) Lot Shape & Dimensions: Irregular being 110 -190± feet deep and 190± feet wide. Access & Frontage on: Meadow Road Residential Improvements: Residential house built in 1951 located on easterly tax parcel. Topography: Subject property rises from Meadow Road to the north. Vegetation: Property is heavily wooded Encumbrances: None Neighborhood: Mostly residential with businesses along France Avenue and along 44th Street in Minneapolis. Neighborhood is close to 50th and France Avenue businesses, as well as Southdale shopping center, and also Minneapolis chain of lakes Harriet, Calhoun Aerial Photo of Subject Property from Hennepin County GIS Evergeen Land Services 7 PHOTOS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ACQUISITION TAKEN BY DOUGLAS K. JOHNSON ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Above Photo: View of Meadow Road frontage on Clausman property. Below Photo: View of proposed easement looking NW'ly ( Clausman property on other side of wall). Evergeen Land Services 8 PHOTOS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ACQUISITION Ahnva Phntn, View nt annrnximate PaSPment area Iookina NVV'IV. tvergeen Lana Services 9 ZONING The subject property is presently zoned "R1 - Single Dwelling Unit District ". Principal Uses: A. Buildings containing not more than one dwelling unit B. Publicly owned parks, playgrounds and athletic facilities. C. Publicly and privately owned golf courses, but not including driving ranges or miniature golf courses as a principal use. Minimum requirements under the R1 District, for lots that are 75 feet or more in width, as follows: Minimum Lot Area - 9,000 sf Minimum Lot Width - 75 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 120 feet Minimum Front Street Setback - 30 feet Minimum Side Street Setback - 15 feet Minimum Interior Side Yard - 5 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback - 25 feet HIGHEST AND BEST USE - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - -- -- - -- -- - -- - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - -- Highest and best use is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fourth Edition, Appraisal Institute, at Page 135, as follows: . The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value. The four criteria the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum profitability. Since this appraisal is concerned with land value, the highest and best use of the subject land as vacant must be determined. Generally the legal use of a property is defined by zoning regulations. The subject is zoned 'R -1: Single Dwelling Unit District which allows for single family residential use of the subject property. Residential use is physically possible, financially feasible, and maximally profitable as shown by the existing use of similarly zoned property. It is our opinion that the highest and best use of the subject property in the before situation is that of a single - family residential lot consistent with the zoning regulations for the City of Edina. It appears that the subject property may have potential for splitting into another building site due to the ample size of the property. If the property were to be split into two, the result would be a westerly 14,652± sf lot and an easterly 14,652± sf lot with the existing house. This appears to give greater value to the land than a single 29,305 sf building site. Evergeen Land Services 10 VALUATION Compensation for the proposed easement is a function of land value rather than improvement value because the proposed easement does not affect the house and yard improvements. Therefore land (lot) sales have been researched in order to determine the value of the subject lot via the Sales Comparison Approach. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE: The sales comparison method is the most common and reliable way of developing a market value estimate for land. In the sales comparison method, sales of vacant land comparable to the subject property are gathered and analyzed. The sales are then compared to the subject property based upon a common unit of comparison such as price per square foot (sf), per acre, or per lot (building site). Relevant differences between the subject and sale properties such as location, size, amenities, etc. are noted and adjustments are made to the sale properties to make them "comparable" to the subject property. If the comparable is superior to the subject, the sale price of the comparable property is adjusted downward to reflect the subject property's inferior status in that comparative factor. If the comparable is inferior to the subject property, its sales price is adjusted upward to reflect the subject's superior status. Thus each comparable receives adjustments to make it more like the subject property, and thus each comparable provides an estimated unit value of the subject property. The appraisers then utilize these unit values derived from each of the comparables to estimate the unit value of the subject property. This unit value is then expanded to the entire subject property and results in an estimate of the market value of the entire subject property as if vacant. The market was searched for recent sales of single - family residential lots within the City of Edina in the last few years. The search consisted of MLS inquiries as well as a sales search of County records. Five such sales were found and verified within the northeast portion of the City of Edina. Comparables are identified on a comparable market data map, summarized and analyzed on a grid to arrive at a final value estimate for the subject property in the before situation. More complete comparable information is found on the sales sheets in the addendum. Please note that the subject and comparable sale properties will be compared on a "building site" basis rather than on a per sf basis, since it is our belief that the market views these properties on a building site basis. Properties are listed and advertised based on their building site list price, and not on their square foot list price. Also please note that the following valuation is of the westerly potential lot assuming that the property is split into two 14,652± sf building sites. Evergeen Land Services 11 Cede "'Ov MAnot P10. ED (17) (1' rr VALUATION (CONTINUED): Cask HrA (r00 '1 ,31 Louis Park Tes Dakota wu i L n kl Palk Palk Cedar -Wes Nan Park R�Zr Lake calmour-, Bas's West Lake Park Calhoun a— F 0 Linden 0 L ynd-z, ins to --Qlvo park Vradlbl ALE NO. 1 GrAf Cntpr' VanvalkentmFg U Palk Country Ckjb Edim P Country C11-A HiWands *I-- IC Park den Park A) r,vy S 6-06) P. dilf. Pali lake Park 4 Aimalmgt! K NBrefeben Park Park w E Edina COMPARABLE MARKET DATA MAP Evergeen Land Services 12 COMPARABLE MARKET DATA SUMMARY & ANALYSIS GRID Comparable Subject Sale 1 Sale 2 Sale 3 Sale 4 Sale 5 No. Property (2012 -0091) (2012 -0090) (2010 -0005) (2012 -0089) (2012 -0092) 4544 Meadow 4601 4600 4240 5209 4228 Location Road, Edina Townes Road Meadow Rd, Crocker Ave, Wooddale Ave, Crocker Ave, Edina Edina Edina Edina Edina Date of Closing NA May 2012 May 27, 2010 Dec. 30, 2009 Jan. 31, 2012 Mar 30, 2011 Intended Use Single Family Single Family Single Family Single Family Single Family Single Family Zoning Single Family Single Family Single Family Single Family Single Family Single Family Shape Irregular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Physical Features/ Many Trees Heavily wooded Many Trees Many Trees Some Trees Some Trees Terrain Sloping Sloping Sloping, Sloping Level, across Sloping Cul -de -sac from Edina Country Club Sales Price $900,000 $650,000 $400,000 $328,000 $280,000 Total Land Area 1052 sf 45,417 sf 16,937 sf 20,000 sf 8025 sf 10,000 sf (excluding road 75x195 139x324 83x202 100x200 60x133.75 50x200 Sales Price With Estimated Demolition - $925,000 $670,000 $400,000 $348,000 $300,000 ADJUSTMENTS Market 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Conditions Adjusted Price/ Market Conditions $925,000 $670,000 $400,000 $348,000 $300,000 Size: -50% -5% -5% +50% +50% Location: +5% 0% +20% +5% +20% Width of Lot: 0% 0% 0% +5% +10% Privacy of Lot: 0% 0% +10% +10% +10% Total Adjustments: -45% -5% +20% +70% +90% Indicated Value /Bldg. $508,750 $636,500 $500,000 $591,600 $570,000 Site Average Indicated Value $561,370 per Building Site Per Building Site Evergeen Land Services 13 EXPLANATION OF ADJUSTMENTS: Market Conditions — All sales are considered recent and no market conditions adjustment are necessary. Size - When comparing on a site basis, typically a larger site will command a higher site value than a smaller site, all other factors being equal. Thus sales substantially larger than the subject property require a downward adjustment and sales substantially smaller than the subject property require an upward adjustment. Location — All sales are within the northeast portion of the city of Edina and are in residential neighborhoods. However adjustments are made for the fact that the subject and Sale No. 2 are on a cul -de -sac and Sales 3 and 5 are in a slightly less desirable area than the subject property. Width of Lot — Not only is the size of the lot important, but width is important because it limits the building improvements that can fit across the lot. An adjustment for a significant difference in lot width is made between subject and sale properties. Privacy of Lot — The subject property is very wooded and has a very private feel to the property since it does not have a house immediately behind it. Thus an adjustment for privacy is made between subject and sale properties. CONCLUSION OF VALUE: The average indicated site value from the five comparable sales is $561,370. However Sale No. 2 is adjacent to the subject and is comparable in size, location, width of lot, and privacy of lot. Therefore it is the appraisers' judgment that the market value of the subject potential westerly lot is higher than the average, and is estimated at $600,000. Although the subject's site value is estimated at $600,000, it is necessary for this valuation to "break down" the estimated market value to a per square foot basis in order to calculate compensation for the proposed acquisition. Since the subject potential westerly lot contains 14,652± sf of land, the corresponding value per SF for the subject property is $40.95 per square foot (SF). Evergeen Land Services 14 DESCRIPTION OF PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT The proposed acquisition consists of a 5 foot wide permanent utility easement along the southwesterly line of the property (10 feet wide on the sliver parcel 18.028.24.11.0016). This permanent utility easement is for the placement of an underground sanitary sewer pipeline on or near the southwest property line of the subject property. The pipeline will be installed via directional boring so as to not affect trees, bushes or other landscape items within the easement. The easement allows the construction, placement, replacement, repair, reconstruction, and maintenance of the sanitary sewer pipeline within the easement. The permanent utility easement will encumber 937 sf of the subject property. . It is possible, but unlikely, that a break in the pipeline could occur at some point in the future. If a break should occur it could necessitate excavation and the removal of vegetation. The City has indicated that any future damage to surface improvements would be compensated at the time of future damage, if and when that occurs. ry��pF, 'r 4043�i. \ —0 C 49' 48 �. 51� Acquis 6 Evergeen Land Services 15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT An easement for utility purposes across Lots 52, 53 and 54, of Auditors Subdivision No. 161, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said easement is described as follows: The southwesterly 5.00 feet of the following described property: That part of said Lots 52, 53 and 54, lying northeasterly of a line 51.00 ft northeasterly of and parallel with the southwesterly line of Lot 50, extended southeasterly across said Lots 52, 53 and 54. And A 10.00 foot easement for utility purposes across Lot 7, Auditors Subdivision No. 319, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said lot 7; thence southwesterly, along the easterly line of said lot 7 a distance of 10.00 ft; thence northwesterly along a line whose projection intersects the north line of said lot 7 with the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly line of lot 50, Auditors Subdivision no. 161, Hennepin County, Minnesota, a distance of 31.55 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence northwesterly a distance of 6.10 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection of the north line of said lot 7 with the southeasterly extension of a line parallel with and 51.00 feet northeasterly from the southwesterly line of said lot 50, said centerline there terminating. EFFECTS OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT ON SUBJECT PROPERTY 1. The acquisition will not affect the size of the property. In both before and after situations the subject is 29,305± sf in size. However in the after situation the subject property is encumbered by 937 sf of permanent sanitary sewer easement along the southwesterly property line of the subject property. 2. The permanent easement will not affect the potential to split the property nor will the easement affect the "buildability" of the subject property since the acquisition is within the existing 5 -foot side yard setback. 3. The placement of the pipeline will not damage surface features such as trees and landscaping since the pipeline will be installed via directional boring. The proposed sanitary sewer will be installed so that it is 25± feet deep near Sunnyside Road and 10± feet deep at Meadow Road. 4. Although it is unlikely that a break in the pipeline will occur, a pipeline break could necessitate digging within the easement area to repair the pipeline, thus causing damage to trees and landscaping. If a break should occur it could necessitate excavation and the removal of any landscape items over the break. The City has stated that compensation for items damaged would be paid at the time of such needed repair. Evergeen Land Services 16 - COMPENSATION The acquisition contains a total of 937 sf of permanent utility easement located along the southwesterly property line of the subject property. The proposed easement is 5 feet in width for the majority of the easement (10 feet in width on the sliver parcel). Since the acquisition is via easement rather than fee title, the owner will still own the acquisition area. Since the easement is for an underground sanitary sewer pipeline, the owner will maintain use of the surface within the easement area and be able to utilize the easement area as part of the yard. Although the easement has little practical effect to the subject property, the presence of the easement is an encumbrance on the property that removes a portion of the bundle of rights of the property. There is also a slight but unlikely chance of a break in the pipeline that would require repair. For these reasons, it is the opinion of the appraisers that the easement area is diminished in value by 25% by the proposed easement encumbrance. Therefore the compensation for the acquisition is as follows: 937 sf of proposed utility easement @ $ 40.95/sf X 25% value loss = $ 9,593 Rounded= $ 9,600 Compensation for trees /shrubs and other improvements — since the proposed pipeline will be installed via directional boring at a depth below most if not all roots, there will be little if any damage to the existing trees, bushes and landscaping. Although it is possible that a break in the pipeline could necessitate digging within the easement area to repair the pipeline, ruptured sanitary sewer pipelines are rare and are not likely to happen within the subject property. If a break should occur it could necessitate excavation and the removal of some landscaping. The City of Edina has indicated that any future damage due to excavation to repair a pipeline break would be paid at the time of damage, if and when that damage should occur. COMPENSATION SUMMARY Compensation for Sanitary Sewer Easement: 937 sf of unencumbered land @ $ 40.95/sf X 25% loss in value $ 9,593 Compensation for Trees /Shrubs within Easement: None will not be removed or damaged) $ 0 Severance Damage: None $ 0 Compensation for Improvements within Acquisition: None fence will not be removed or damaged) $ 0 Total Compensation (rounded) $ 9,600 Evergeen Land Services 17 �__ CONTINGENT ANDiLIMITING CONDLTIONS This appraisal report is made subject to the following conditions: 1. The size and shape of the subject acquisition is as shown on drawings obtained from the City of Edina. 2. No survey of the subject or sale properties has been made by the appraisers. The size of the sales were calculated from half section maps or County or City information or MLS information or GIS information. 3. The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters legal in nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor do the appraisers render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. Any existing liens or encumbrances have been disregarded and the property is appraised as free and clear and under competent management. 4. Soils are assumed to be adequate for the highest and best use of the property. The appraisers assume no responsibility for inadequate soils. 5. The appraisers assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraisers assume no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering that might be required to discover such factors. 6. The comparable sales data utilized in this appraisal are believed to be from reliable sources. However, it is necessary in an appraisal to rely on information furnished by others. Therefore, the value conclusions are subject to the correctness of the data as furnished by others. 7. The market value herein assigned is based on conditions, which were applicable as of the effective date of appraisal, unless otherwise noted. 8. The maps and exhibits in this appraisal are of illustrative purposes only, and are not meant to be for establishing definite boundaries. 9. The appraisers are not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made this appraisal unless previous arrangements have been made. 10. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraisers, and in any event, only with properly written consent and only in its entirety. 11. Environmental Disclaimer - The value estimated in this report is based on the assumption that the property is not negatively affected by the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. The appraisers are not experts in the identification of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. The appraisers' inspection of the subject property did not develop any information that indicated any apparent significant hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions, which would affect the property negatively. The appraisers have not been privy to any Phase I Environmental Inspections of the property. The appraisers assume that the property is free and clear of hazardous substances. Evergeen Land Services 18 COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO. 1 Evergeen Land Services 19 Property 4601 Townes Road City[Township City of Edina, Address: & County: Hennepin County x Present Use at Residential lot and house Highest & Best Tear down House • Time of Sale: Use: Zoning: Residential Single Family PIN/ Geo Code: 18.028.24.11.0091 Legal Lot 8 Auditor's Subdivision No. 319 and Lot 34 of Auditor's Subdivision No. Description: 161, Hennepin County, MN Size SF or 45,417 sf Irregular shape, 324± feet deep and 139± feet wide Acres: Grantor(s): • Grantee(s): Adler Trust Company Date of Sale: May 2012 Document No.: Confirmed With: MLS and Listing Agent Sue Wahman Confirmed By: Douglas K. Johnson on October 3, 2012 Sale Conditions: Assumed Armslength Sale Price: $900,000 plus estimated demolition cost of $25,000 = $ 925,000 Sale Price Per $ 19.82 per sf uding Estimated $ 20.37 per sf SF: FDemolition: - sale property is within Edina's "White Oaks" neighborhood, about 1 mile north of 50"' & France commercial area, and just west of Minneapolis' & Edina's 44'h and France commercial area. - property is on SE quadrant of intersection of Sunnyside Road and Townes Road. - property is somewhat rectangular in shape and is heavily wooded. ' - listing agent stated buyers bought knowing house was total remodel or teardown, and after ' several months decided to tear down in fall of 2012 and build new. - MLS listing states in "Neighborhood of remodel and teardowns ". s (2012 -0091) Evergeen Land Services 19 COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO. 2 Evergeen Land Services 20 Property 4600 Meadow Road City/Township City of Edina, Address: & County: Hennepin County Present Use at Residential lot and house Highest & Best Tear down House i ' Time of Sale: Use: Zoning: Residential Single Family ' PIN/ Geo Code: 18.028.24.11.0044 • � Legal Metes and bounds description within Registered Land Survey No. 0111 Description: Size SF or 16,937± sf (83' x 202+ feet) Slightly irregular in east. Acres: Grantor(s): r • Grantee(s): Mark W. Veldman Date of Sale: May 27, 2010 Document No.: Confirmed With: MLS and Listing Agent Sue Wahman v Confirmed By: Douglas K. Johnson on October 3, 2012 Sale Conditions: Assumed Armslength Sale Price: $650,000 plus estimated demolition cost of $20,000 = $ 670,000 ' Sale Price Per $ 38.37 per sf Including Estimated $ 39.56 per sf SF: Demolition: - sale property is within Edina's "White Oaks" neighborhood, about 1 mile north of 50 & France commercial area, and just west of Minneapolis' & Edina's 441h and France commercial area. - property is on a cul -de -sac and is heavily wooded. - property was advertised on MLS as "neighborhood of teardown and large remodel projects ". - property was purchased for teardown and house was removed after date of sale. New house constructed. 1 ,s (2012 -0090) Evergeen Land Services 20 COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO. 3 Evergeen Land Services 21 Property 4240 Crocker Avenue City /Township Edina Address: & County: Hennepin Present Use at Vacant lot Highest & Best Single family building Time of Sale: Use: site Zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. ' PIN/ Geo Code: 07.028.24.42.0057 Legal Lot 11, Block 2, Crocker & Crowles 15 Addition, Hennepin County, Description: Minnesota Size 20,000 sq.. Square Feet: Grantor(s): a Grantee(s): Scott Larson Construction, Inc. Date of Sale: December 30, 2009 Off Market Date: December 14, 2009 Confirmed With: MLS, County Records and Listing Agent a Confirmed By: Patricia Nolan Conditions of Assumed Arms length Sale: Sale Price: $400,000 Per Sq. Ft. $ 20.00 Price Per Lot: $400,000 - Wooded, walk -out lot - Good tree cover a - Lot slopes downward to the north a (2010 -0005) Evergeen Land Services 21 COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO. 4 r _''A 1 Sale Property Evergeen Land Services 22 Property 5209 Wooddale Avenue City/Township City of Edina, Address: & County: Hennepin County Present Use at Residential lot and house Highest & Best Tear down House Time of Sale: Use: ' Zoning: Residential Single Family PIN/ Geo Code: 18.028.24.43.0036 Legal Lot 18, Block 3, South Harriet Park Addition, Hennepin County, MN Description: Size SF or 8025 sf (60' x 133.75') Acres: Grantor(s): • Grantee(s): Gennadiy and Irina Sizonenko Date of Sale: January 31, 2012 Document No.: Confirmed With: MLS and Dan Willette (listing agent) on Oct 3, 2012 Confirmed By: Douglas K. Johnson Sale Conditions: Armslength Sale Price: $ 328,000 plus demolition estimated at $20,000 = $ 348,000 Sale Price Per $ 40.87 per sf Including Estimated $ 43.36 per sf SF: Demolition: - sale property had a 1936 house that needed extensive remodel or tear down. Buyers purchased to tear down and then built a house that they sold for $1,160,000. am - sale property had moderate tree cover - sale property is across street from Edina Country Club golf course. j - 2012 assessed value for land was $297,300 and for improvements was $159,800, for total of $457,100. - house removed after sale (2012 -0089) Evergeen Land Services 22 COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO. 5 Evergeen Land Services 23 Property 4228 Crocker Avenue City /Township City of Edina, Address: & County: Hennepin County Present Use at Residential lot and house Highest & Best Tear down House • Time of Sale: Use: ' Zoning: Residential Single Family 07.028.24.42.0051 ' PIN/ Geo Code: • • Legal N% Lot 7, Block 2, Crocker & Crowells 1St Addition, Hennepin County, MN Description: Size SF or 10,000 sf (50' x 200') Acres: Grantor(s): • Grantee(s): 4228 Crocker Avenue LLC Date of Sale: March 30, 2011 Document No.: • Confirmed With: MLS and Listing Agent Linda Heglund Confirmed By: Douglas K. Johnson on October 3, 2012 Sale Conditions: Assumed Armslength Sale Price: $ 280,000 plus estimated demolition cost of $20,000 = $300,000 Sale Price Per $ 28.00 per sf Including Estimated $ 30.00 per sf SF: Demolition: - sale property is within Edina's "Morningside" neighborhood, about 1 mile north of 50 & France commercial area, and just west of Minneapolis' & Edina's 44th and France commercial area. - property is an interior lot on west side of Crocker Avenue. • - property is rectangular in shape and 50 feet wide by 200 feet deep. - several trees on lot ' - listing agent stated house was fine but buyer was a builder who bought to tear down and ' rebuild. - walkout lot - Assessor's estimated 2011 market values are $204,400 for land, $73,300 for buildings. 2012 -0092 Evergeen Land Services 23 F APPRAISER';S QUALIFICATIONS NAME: Douglas K. Johnson, SR/WA BUSINESS ADDRESS: Evergreen Land Services 4131 Old Sibley Memorial Highway, Suite 201 Eagan, MN 55122 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Past President and Board Member of Chapter 20 of the International Right of Way Association; IRWA Instructor APPRAISER LICENSE: Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota - ID # 4001052 PRESENT EMPLOYMENT: Vice President and Appraisal Manager Evergreen Land Services APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE: 1) Property Manager & Acquisition Specialist Washington County Dept. of Transportation & Physical Development Stillwater, Minnesota April 1987 — September 2002 Principle duties included managing acquisition program for highways and parks; appraised for acquisition purposes, review of appraisals, negotiations. 2) Appraiser, Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of Interior Bismarck, North Dakota October 1985 — April 1987 Principle duty was the appraisal of properties for partial Acquisitions for federal water projects in ND, MT, WY 3) Appraiser, Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of Interior Billings, Montana April 1979 — October 1985 Principle duty was the appraisal of properties for land exchanges, acquisitions, sales, and easements in MT and SD. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science Degree - 1978 College of Forestry, University of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota APPRAISAL EDUCATION: (partial list) American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers International Right of Way Association Appraisal Principles Appraisal of Partial Acquisitions Capitalization Theory/Techniques —1 Intro to Income Approach to Valuation Capitalization Theory/Techniques —2 Easement Valuation (instructor) Capitalization Theory/Techniques —3 Principles of Appraisal (instructor) American Society Farm Mqrs & Rural Appraisers Society of Real Estate Appraisers Transitional Use /Scenic Easements Residential Property Valuation Advanced Rural Appraisal Evergeen Land Services 24 APP ISE S QUALIFICATIONS Name: Patricia J. Nolan Business Address: Evergreen Land Services 4131 Old Sibley Memorial Highway, Suite 201 Eagan, MN 55122 Appraiser License: Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License #20243478 Present Employment: Staff Appraiser Evergreen Land Services Appraisal Experience: Staff Appraiser —Appraisal Concepts, Inc. 05/01/1986 — 03/17/2006 Work experience included residential appraisals such as — single family detached homes, town homes, condos, 2 & 4 family properties, vacant land, also assisted in appraising properties for eminent domain purposes Staff Appraiser — Evergreen Land Services 03/20/2006 — current Current work experience includes several large, right of way projects, commercial buildings, vacant commercial and residential land Appraisal Education: Real Estate Appraising 101 thru 108 General Appraiser Report Writing & Case Studies General Appraiser Sales Comparison Approach FHA Appraisal USPAP Right Of Way Professional Workshop 2006 & 2007 Appraising Historic Properties Back to the Basics Houses: 20 Cost Eff.lmprovements Houses: Interior Styles, Designs, etc. Houses: Toxic Mold Alert Environmental Pollution and Mold House: Hazards Inside Machinery & Equipment Valuation ME201 Machinery & Equipment Valuation ME202 Machinery & Equipment Valuation ME203 A.S.A. Ethics Course Construction Blueprint Course Evergeen Land Services 25 To: Mayor and Council From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works 9150 Date: 2/22/2013 Subject: Purchase of GMC Sierra 4WD vehicle, Public Works Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 01/08/2013 Company: Nelson Auto Center Recommended Quote or Bid: Nelson Auto Center. State contract # 37907 �91�1f oe Agenda Item #: IV.H The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: 12/31/2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $ 24,666.67 General Information: This is a replacement vehicle for Vehicle No. 25 -282, a 2001 Chevrolet with 145,000 miles. It has significant rust and has outlived its useful life and needs replacement. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 F Y To: City Council From: Brian Olson, P.E. Director of Public Works 9,60 \VV • Agenda Item #: IV-1 Action Discussion ❑ Date: 1/8/2013 Information ❑ Subject Lease Agreement For Use of Radio Equipment On Community Water Tower Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign attached agreement with the Edina School District Information / Background: As you may be aware, the FCC requires that any radio technology emit narrowband emissions in 2013. The Edina School District has requested the use of our broadband radios and repeater that is located on our Water Tower located on the Community Center water tower located at 5849 Ruth Drive. As you are also aware, the Public Works Department has converted its communication to 800 MHz radios and cell phone technology. The 800 MHz radio system is a much more reliable system and is the same technology that the Police and Fire Department utilize. We would much prefer to spend the amount that is necessary to convert the radio system to narrowband and use that to enhance our 800 MHz to increase our efficiency and ability to communicate with the Emergency Services departments within the City of Edina. Staff recommends authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign the attached agreement for the use of the repeater at the top of the water tower located at 5849 Ruth Drive. This proposal will also allow the school district to enhance and improve their communication system. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ( "Lease ") is entered into this day of , 2013 between the CITY OF EDINA , a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "Landlord" or "City "), and corporation, ( "Tenant "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Landlord is the owner of certain real property located at 5849 Ruth Drive, Minnesota, as legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof ( "Property"); and WHEREAS, Landlord has donated to Tenant certain equipment that is in place on the Landlord's water tower; and WHEREAS, Tenant has requested that the Landlord lease a portion of the Property to Tenant to enable Tenant to maintain and use the donated equipment; and WHEREAS, Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant a portion of the Property for the Communications Equipment that Landlord has donated to Tenant subject to the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. PROPERTY. Subject to the following terms and conditions, Landlord leases to Tenant certain space on Landlord's water tower located on the Property subject to all existing easements together with appurtenant non - exclusive easements for access and utilities on Landlord's Property on a non - exclusive basis. The primary purpose of Landlord's ownership of the Property is to: (a) operate and maintain a municipal water tower so as to provide water service to residents of; and (b) to provide communication systems to the Edina and other radio tenants. 2. TERM. This Lease shall be for an indefinite term. 3. RENT. On the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Landlord, as rent for the term of the lease One Dollar and No /100 ($1.00). 4. USER PRIORITY. The Landlord and Tenant agree that the following priorities of use, in descending order, shall apply in the event of communication interference or other uses of the Property that conflict with Tenant's uses or other users of the Property while this Lease is in effect: a. The Landlord's water storage and distribution needs and the Landlord's 167791v1 communication needs. b. .:Existing leases on the Tower and the Property, unless there is a material modification of any existing equipment configuration and/or frequency characteristics. C. Other government- related entities who offer a. service to the general public for a fee, in a.manner similar to a public: utility, such as long distance and..:cellular telephone, not including radio or which the County is legally authorized to :provide. This use shall be non - exclusive; and the, specifically reserves the rightao allow the Tower and Property to be used by other parties and to make additions, deletions, or modifications to its own facilities on the Tower and the Property. d. New, leases or renewals of existing leases for non- public safety communications. PERMITTED USES. a. Subject to the terms of this Lease, and the recommendations of the City's communications consultant, the Property may be used by Tenant solely for the purposes of removing and maintaining the communications equipment that Landlord has donated to Tenant ( "Tenant's Equipment ") and in accordance with the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals authorized for use by Tenant by the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC "). This use is non - exclusive, and Landlord reserves the right to allow the Property to be used by others, and to make additions, deletions or modifications to its own facilities on the Property. Tenant shall comply with all ordinances, statutes and regulations of local, state and federal agencies. b. Landlord agrees to give reasonable advance notice of any major repair or maintenance activities related to Tower operations. In the case of an emergency, notification is not required; however,. Tenant will be notified as soon as possible of a recognized emergency. In the event that use of the Tower for water service, or use of the Tower to perform any necessary maintenance or repair, is interrupted or made impractical because of Tenant's Equipment on the Tower, the City may interrupt Tenant's use of the Property as reasonably necessary to. prevent interruption of water service or interruption of maintenance and repair of the Tower. The City will use its best efforts to.prevent or minimize interruptions to Tenant's use. C. Any additional expense of repainting, repairing, or maintaining the Property, Building or Tower reasonably incurred by the City as a direct consequence of the presence of Tenant's Equipment being located thereon shall be paid promptly by Tenant;to the City upon receipt of the City's written notice of such additional cost, which notice shall state the reason(s) for the incurring of such costs and shall include a reasonable itemization of such costs. e. Tenant shall notify the City of Edina of scheduled work on Tenant's Equipment that is to be done after 5:00 o'clock p.m. on business days, and any time on weekends and holidays. The notice shall be given to City so that it is received at least 48 hours in advance of 167791v1 2 the start of the scheduled work. In the case of Tenant's emergency work on Tenant's Equipment Tenant shall notify the City as soon as practicable after'commencement of the work. f. Tenant may not add, change or alter Tenant's Equipment without the prior written approval of the Landlord. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord for all reasonable costs incurred by the Landlord in connection with any alteration or modification of, or addition to, Tenant's Equipment pursuant to this paragraph, including but not limited to plan review, structural review, site meetings; inspection time, and as -built updating because "of Tenant's changes, including attorney's fees for drafting and and/or reviewing documents; provided, however, that with respect to any such alteration, modification or addition, additional Rent may be charged for the additional equipment that is installed by Tenant. 6. TENANT'S COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. a. Landlord agrees to maintain and operate the Property and the Property in accordance with good engineering practices, with all applicable FCC rules and regulations. b. Tenant shall be solely responsible for any taxes on its personal property. 7. UTILITY SERVICE. Landlord will allow Tenant, at Tenant's cost and expense, to connect to its existing utility services. Tenant shall furnish Landlord with pertinent information as to the exact type of AC power requirements, and at Tenant's cost and expense, Landlord's electrician will wire the dedicated circuit. Landlord will review Tenant's power usage based on Tenant's application, and what Tenant believes to be its average monthly kilowatt hours. Landlord may charge additional Rent to Tenant's for the electricity used by Tenant. Landlord shall not be responsible for any damages which occur as a result of interruption of any utility services. The Property does not have a generator; therefore, Landlord is not responsible for providing emergency backup electricity to Tenant if there is an interruption in electric service to the Property. Landlord will provide and pay for the cost of air conditioning the Building. Payment for telephone service for Tenant's Antenna Facilities shall be Tenant's responsibility without any adjustment to Rent. 8. TERMINATION. a. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without penalty or further liability.by either party on sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other Party. b. Upon termination of this Lease, Tenant shall, within thirty (30) days thereof, remove all of its property.: Tenant, at its expense, agrees to return the Property and the Tower surface where Tenant's property has been to their original condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Any of Tenant's property remaining on the Property or the Tower thirty (30) days after the expiration or the termination of this Lease shall be removed by Landlord at Tenant's cost and expense and shall become the property of Landlord free of any claim by Tenant or any person - claiming through Tenant. 167791v1 3 . 9. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION. a. General. Tenant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and againstany and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, actions, or causes of action,; including. reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which may be asserted against or incurred by Landlord orfor which Landlordmay.be liable in the:perforimance of this Lease, except those which:arise solely from the negligence, willful, misconduct, or other fault of Landlord. Tenant shall defend all. claims arising. out of the installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair, removal, or, presence of Tenant's Communication Facilities, equipment and related facilities on the Property. b. Tenant's Warranty. Tenant represents, covenants and warrants that its use of the Property will not generate and Tenant will not store or dispose of on the Property; nor transport to or over the Property, any Hazardous Materials, unless Tenant specifically informs Landlord thereof in writing twenty -four hours prior to such storage, disposal or transport, or otherwise as soon as Tenant becomes aware of the existence of Hazardous Materials on the Property. The obligations of this Paragraph 13 shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Lease. 10. LIMITATION OF LANDLORD'S LIABILITY. If Landlord terminates this Lease other than as of right as provided in this Lease, or Landlord causes interruption of the business of Tenant or for any other Landlord breach of this Lease, Landlord's liability for damages to Tenant shall be limited to the actual and direct costs of the removal of Tenant's property. 11. ASSIGNMENT. This Lease, or rights thereunder, may not be sold, assigned, or transferred at any time by Tenant. 12. NOTICES. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certified mail,_ return receipt requested, to the following addresses: If to Landlord: City of Edina 4801 W 501' St. Edina, MN 55424 167791x1- 4 with copy to: City Attorney Campbell Knutson Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 If to Tenant: with copy to: - 13. MISCELLANEOUS: a. Complete Lease: Amendments. This Agreement supersedes all prior discussions and negotiations and contains all agreements and. understandings between the Landlord and Tenant. This Agreement may only be amended.in writing signed by all parties. Exhibit "A" is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. b. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts by the parties hereto. C. Binding g ffect. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall extend to and bind the heirs,. personal representatives, successors and assigns of Landlord and Tenant. d. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws. of the state.in which the Landlord's Property is located. e. Severability. If any term of this Lease is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. f. Recitals. The Recital paragraphs and the terms and definitions therein are incorporated into this Lease as if they were set forth herein. 167791v1 5 is Its: THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 RNK 167791v1 6 167791v1 1800 EAST CLIFF ROAD, SUITE 17A BURNSVILLE., MINNESOTA 55337 COMMUNICATIONS INC SALES 952. 808 -0033 SERVICE 952 - 808 -7699 FAX 952 -808 -0034 TECHNICAL CENTER INC Mr. David White City of Edina:Bus Transportation 5220 Eden :Avenue Edina, MN 55436 David, This letter is in reference to using the City of Edina's UHF repeater and water tower site located.by Concord elementary school. With the FCC mandate to go narrowband on January. 1,2013, it would be very beneficial for you to use this repeater and current location to enhance your operations from an efficiency and safety protocol. Your radios have to migrate to narrow band and when you do this your coverage is affected and thus may create a safety concern by not being able to have the coverage needed for your drivers to communicate with you. The city has the ability, by allowing you to use the water tower site, to make sure you provide the best possible radio coverage which will in turn provide better and safer operations. Radio coverage depends on power of the transmitter, height of the antenna and emissions of the radio (25kilohertz vs. the mandate to narrow band; 12.5kilohertz). Currently, the bus companies transmitter location and height of antenna is providing only adequate radio coverage today but when they go to narrowband (12.5 kilohetz) a strong probability that their radio coverage will not be adequate and create a safety concern.. Thus, by using the city's water tower and repeater, you gain a height advantage compared to your current operations and thus providing a safer solution. The advantage to: the city will be a safer transportation for the children of Edina. You will need to make sure their FCC license is current and correct (at your cost). In addition, the current frequency is being used today by Edina Public Works with no issues of interference occurring. Your only change to the frequency is to change the emission to narrow band (12.5 kilohertz) and this will actually minimize any interference compared to today's usage. In my opinion, with Edina Public Works going away from this current UHF system (a good decision due to cost associated with being compliant to the FCC mandate), this is a very cooperative and generous decision and a true benefit to the city of Edina. I welcome any question or concerns and I am willing to assist in any way to make this decision beneficial to all.. Regards, Dam, DcimLK jer Dean Daninger Ancom Communications Authorized Motorola Dealer Q E -MAIL: sales @ancom.org; service @ancom.org WE651TE: www.ancom.org MOTOROLA Authorized Two -Way Radio Dealer To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL o e Agenda Item #: IV. J. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -13 Approval of Removal Of Remarketing Agent For Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Apartments Project), Series 2004 And Appointment of Successor Remarketing Agent Action Requested: Resolution No. 2013 -13 Approval of Removal of Remarketing Agent for Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Apartments Project), Series 2004 and Appointment of Successor Remarketing Agent Information / Background: The Vernon Terrace Apartments was financed as a conduit bond issue in 2004 through the City of Edina. The bonds require on -going administration in the form of remarketing services. This is the service that sets the weekly variable interest rates for the bonds. Vernon Terrace Apartments wishes to transfer the bond remarketing services from Piper Jaffray & Co. to Dougherty & Company. Pursuant to the 2004 Bond Documents the Borrower is entitled to transfer this service with .Freddie Mac's consent (credit facility or support for the bonds). The Bond Documents also require the consent of the City of Edina. By making this change, the bond document will no change, the transaction will not change and the requirements of the Borrower will not change. Because this is a conduit issue the City of Edina has no liability related to the issue. The Borrower has received Freddie Mac's consent. To complete the process the Borrower needs to receive the consent of the City. The City's bond counsel, Dorsey & Whitney has drafted the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Notice to Trustee and Remarketing Agent which would satisfy the City's consent in this matter. Attachment: Resolution No. 2013 -13 Approval of Removal of Remarketing Agent for Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Apartments Project), Series 2004 and Appointment of Successor Remarketing Agent Form of Notice to Trustee and Remarketing Agent REPORT / RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -13 RESOLUTION APPROVING REMOVAL OF REMARKETING AGENT FOR MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (VERNON TERRACE APARTMENTS PROJECT), SERIES 2004 AND APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR REMARKETING AGENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Page 2 Section 1. Recitals. The City has issued its Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds' (Vernon Terrace Apartments Project), Series 2004 (the 'Bonds ") pursuant to a Trust Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2004 (the "Indenture "), between the Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee "), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, and loaned the proceeds of the Bonds to Bigos - Vernon Terrace, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Borrower "). The Bonds and the Indenture provide, among other things, that the owners of the Bonds (the 'Bondholders ") may elect (or may be required) in certain instances to tender their Bonds for purchase upon the terms and conditions contained in the Bonds and the Indenture. The Indenture appointed Piper Jaffray & Co. ( "Piper ") as remarketing agent for the Bonds to perform certain duties, including the use of its best efforts to remarket any Bonds tendered for purchase by the Bondholders. The Borrower has requested that pursuant to Section 10.06(c) of the Indenture that the City approve the removal of Piper as remarketing agent for the Bonds and the appointment of Dougherty & Company LLC ( "Dougherty ") as successor remarketing agent for the Bonds. Section 2. Approval of Removal of Remarketing Agent and Appointment of Successor Remarketing Agent. The removal of Piper as remarketing agent for the Bonds and the appointment of Dougherty as successor remarketing agent for the Bonds is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the trustee notice of the approval by the City of such removal of Piper as the remarketing agent for the Bonds and the appointment of Dougherty as successor remarketing agent. Passed and adopted by the City Council on December 22, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 22, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk ,.F . • i. FORM OF NOTICE TO TRUSTEE AND REMARKETING AGENT [DATE] U.S. Bank National Association 60 Livingstone Avenue EP- MN -WS3T St. Paul; MN 55107 Attn: Dan Skef Re: $5,507,000 City of Edina, Minnesota Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Apartments Project) Series 2004 (the "Bonds ") Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 10.06(c) of the Trust Indenture. dated as of June 1, 2004 between the City of Edina. Minnesota (the "Issuer ") and U.S. Bank National Association, the Issuer at the request of Biggs -Vernon Terrace, LLC, (the "Borrower ") hereby directs the removal of Piper Jaffray & Co. as the Remarketing Agent and the substitution of Dougherty & Company LLC as Remarketing Agent. Enclosed are (i) the request of the Borrower to such removal and substitution, (ii) the consent of the Federal Home Loan Corporation, as Credit Facility Provider, to such removal and substitution, and (iii) the form of the new Remarketing Agreement. The removal and substitution of the remarketing agent shall be effective as of 2012. cc: Piper Jaffray& Co. 800 Nicollet Mall, 13th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attn: Public Finance Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 8100 Jones Branch Drive Mail Stop B4F McLean, VA 22102 Attn: Director of Multifamily Loan Servicing 5021425v2 Very truly yours, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Mayor By City Manager Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 8100 Jones Branch Drive Mail Stop B4Q McLean, VA 22102 Attn: Director of Multifamily Management and Information Control Bigos - Sibley Tower, LLC c/o Bigos Investment Company 6400 Barrie Road, Suite 1400 Edina, MN 55435 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 8200 Jones Branch Drive McLean, VA 22102 Attn: Associate General Counsel - Multifamily Legal Division Oak Grove Capital 2177 Youngman Street St. Paul, MN 55116 Attn: Melinda Duba, Servicing Department � o To: Edina City Council Agenda Item #: I.V. K From: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -15 Accepting Urban Area Security Initiative Grant (UASI 10- 00732) Action Requested: I would recommend that you approve Resolution No. 2013 -15 accepting the Urban Area Security Initiative Grant (UASI 10- 00732) Information / Background: This FEMA Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant is for reimbursement of Fire Department Special Operations Team training and equipment that was conducted in 2012. The grant covers instruction, overtime and equipment. The total reimbursement is for $27,331.73. UASI program funds address the unique planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high- threat, high- density urban areas, and assists them in building an enhanced and sustainable capacity to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism. j REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -1S EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE GRANT WHEREAS, The City of Edina and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have agreed to enter into an agreement for the training and equipment for the Edina Fire Department. The City of Edina agrees that the UASI program funds address the unique planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high- threat, high- density urban areas and assists them in building an enhanced and sustainable capacity to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby accepts the agreement and documents relating to The Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Fiscal Year 2010 Urban Area Security Initiative Grant UASI 10 -00732 in the amount of $27,331.73 IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. Passed and adopted this 22nd day of January, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22th day of January, 2013. City Clerk o To: Edina City Council Agenda Item #• LV. L From: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject:_ Resolution No. 2013 -16 Accepting Emergency Management Performance Grant OMB -A133 Action Requested: I would recommend that you approve Resolution No. 2013 -16 accepting the Emergency Management Performance Grant from. Hennepin County Emergency Management Information / Background: This Emergency Management Performance Grant from Hennepin County Emergency Management is to be used for equipment upgrades to the City of Edina Emergency Operations Center (EOC) located at Fire Station # 1. The grant is for $12,155.00. Hennepin County Emergency Management is responsible for development of plans and programs to maintain a state of readiness to meet natural, man -made, and technological disasters on a local or county-wide basis. Hennepin County Emergency Management also coordinates and maintains inventories of disaster resources in the county, both public and private, as well as plans for the effective utilization of resources in the county with the assistance of designated county departmental emergency management coordinators, appointed municipal directors, and volunteers ri * EPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-16 EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT WHEREAS, The City of Edina and Hennepin County Emergency Management have agreed to enter into an agreement for equipment for the Edina Emergency Management Operations Center. The City of Edina agrees that the Hennepin County Emergency Management program funds are for the development of plans and programs to maintain a state of readiness to meet natural, man- made, and technological disasters. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby accepts the agreement and documents relating to Emergency Management Performance Grant OMB -A133 in the amount of $12,155.00. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. Passed and adopted this 22nd day of January, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22th day of January, 2013. City Clerk In �° To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: January 22, 2013 Agenda Item #- IV. M. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013- 10, Supporting Grant Application, Hennepin County HRA for Supplemental Transit- Oriented Development Funds, Edina Medical Plaza Project, 6500 France Avenue Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Hennepin County offers competitive grant funding for new development projects that are located along transit corridors and designed in a way that encourage compact development that take advantage of existing transportation and utility infrastructure. Grant funding can be awarded to aspects of the development that serve a public purpose, such as public plazas, pedestrian -scale lighting, bike racks, bus shelters, and other streetscaping. The recently approved Edina Medical Plaza at 6500 France is designed in a manner that encourages pedestrian mobility and enhances the streetscape to increase the safety and attractiveness for pedestrians. It is located directly on a bus route, thus being eligible for consideration. The private developer, Mount Development Company, is required to provide a resolution from the City that shows support for the grant application. If a grant is awarded from Hennepin County, the City will serve as a conduit to provide grant funds to the developer. The City is under no obligation, however to provide any grant funds from its own sources. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -10 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -10 SUPPORTING A GRANT APPLICATION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HCHRA) FOR SUPPLEMENTAL TRANSIT- ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) FUNDS FOR THE EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA PROJECT — 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a city located within Hennepin County and therefore eligible to access and administer supplemental TOD grants; and WHEREAS, Mount Development Company,(the Developer) has completed plans to construct a five -story medical office building and adjacent four- or five -level parking structure (the Project) at 6500 France Avenue South,,;Edina Minnesota, 55435; and WHERAS, the Project contains a variety of design elements to encourage employees and clients to access the site by transit, walking or bicycling, in addition to driving; and WHERAS, the Project's site plan includes extensive improvements to encourage pedestrian movement to and through the site;.and WHERAS, the City has granted final planning approval for the Project on December 5, 2012; and WHEREAS the Project is located within the boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, a certified redevelopment district established on September 29, 1977 with various modifications including those dated February 21, 2012; and WHERAS, the Developer will prepare and submit an application for grant funding; and WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project and grant administration; and WHEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract grant agreements; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council supports the submittal of the application in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 383B.77, Subd. 3. and authorizes the Mayor to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant, in the event that the project is awarded grant funding. Attest: Adopted by the Edina City Council this 22nd day of January, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor L1. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk REPORT /RECOMMENDATION o Q 0� To: City Council MessX888 Agenda Item #: VI. A. From: Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager Action ❑ Discussion IK Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing: Neighborhood Boundaries And Names And.Related Neighborhood Association Policy Action Requested: No Council action is required tonight. As requested earlier by the Council, the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee will present a summary of the Name Your Neighborhood final report. After the public hearing, both items will be forwarded to the February 5 Council meeting for final discussion. Information / Background: The Name Your Neighborhood project started in January of 2012 and was led by the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee — a group of residents appointed by the City Council to facilitate resident input in the identification and naming of neighborhoods. Committee members were Hope Melton (chair), Dick Brozic (vice chair), Bruce Carlson, Bright Dornblaser, Laura Ericksen, Rob Erickson, Paula Harter, Jennifer Janovy, Bob Miller, Bob Moore and Gene Persha. The Committee gathered input through a community-wide written survey and three community meetings held May 30, July I I and Sept. 12. The Committee presented its final recommendations at the December 4, 2012 Council work session. The report contained a summary of the community comments gathered during the course of the project. Attached are additional comments received since the report was finalized. At the same work session, staff reviewed a draft policy for neighborhood associations. A revised version of the policy incorporating Council input is also attached. Attachments: • Neighborhood Association Policy • Summary of Community Feedback Received after the Name Your Neighborhood Report • Maps of Proposed Neighborhood Names and Boundaries Neighborhood Association Policy Definitions Neighborhood. A geographic area defined by the City that exists as a sub -area within the City as a whole. Each property within the City resides within a single neighborhood. Neighbors. A group of residents or legal entities who own or occupy property within a neighborhood. Neighborhood Association (NA). A voluntary neighborhood -based organization, recognized by the City, and in compliance with this policy. Purpose The City encourages the voluntary formation of NAs for the purpose of facilitating communication between residents, City staff and officials, fostering interaction between individuals on issues of common geographic concern and building a better community through cooperative action. In keeping with this philosophy, the City will seek to notify and consult with NAs on matters of neighborhood interest. NAs will be notified when: o Significant neighborhood projects are being discussed or proposed such as street reconstruction, park development or redevelopment or land use planning. A mailing goes out to residents in the neighborhood related to a City matter or public hearing. A developer requests a neighborhood meeting for the purpose of sketch plan review. o The City is seeking to organize a neighborhood group for resident input. Expectations The following expectations exist with respect to NAs: • NAs will be included in the public input process but will not be assumed,by City officials to speak on behalf of all neighbors and will not limit the ability of any person or entity, including non - recognized neighborhood groups, in participating on their own behalf. Communication with the NA will not replace the City's traditional methods of direct outreach to residents. • -NAs are strictly voluntary and no neighbor will be required to join. Each NA will determine its own priorities and desired level of activity. • NAs will not assume the role of an administrative or legislative body. NAs have no legal authority to enact or enforce property design or maintenance requirements. O Only one NA may exist in each neighborhood. Bylaws In order to be recognized as a NA by the City, neighborhood associations are required to adopt bylaws that include the following elements: 0 An outline of the neighborhood boundaries as defined by the City, Membership criteria allowing any neighbor over the age of 18 the right to belong and to vote. A statement that the association will not discriminate based on race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, familial status or national origin in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services, credit and education, • A minimum of one annual meeting each calendar year and a requirement that the time, place and purpose of the annual meeting be well publicized, including notifying the City 21 days in advance of the meeting, • Procedures for the election and removal of officers, •. Number of members required for quorum and how votes are taken and recorded, • A defined method for maintaining contact with association members and the City, and • A statement of compliance with this policy. Changes or amendments to the bylaws should be forwarded to the City staff liaison. Recognition A group of neighbors intending to form a recognized neighborhood association must notify the City staff liaison. The recognition steps are as follows: • An educational meeting may be conducted, upon request, by the City staff liaison. • The City notifies, in writing, all neighbors of the opportunity to vote on becoming a recognized neighborhood association and the proposed neighborhood association bylaws. • After an affirmative vote, the association formally applies for recognition and submits a completed recognition application and minutes from the meeting during which the neighbors voted to seek recognition and a copy of the current or proposed association bylaws. • The City staff liaison will forward the application materials to the City Manager for review and approval. The City Manager will notify the association and City Council of his or her decision with regard to recognition in writing. Associations can appeal the decision of the City Manager to the City Council. Removal of Recognition The City Manager has the authority to remove recognition from a NA if the. association fails to comply with any requirement of this section. Prior to the removal of recognition, the neighborhood association will be given written notice of non - compliance and a period of 60 days to correct the issue. If the City Manager removes recognition, the neighborhood association and City Council will be informed of his or her decision in writing. To regain status, the neighborhood association must reapply for recognition. Funding Membership fees, when established by the bylaws of a NA, shall be voluntary and not preclude any neighbor from participating in the NA. Neighborhood associations may charge fees for events or activities that do not include voting on association business. The City shall not serve as the fiduciary agent for a neighborhood association. Any association which raises money outside of a city- sponsored grant or program is responsible for complying with applicable state and federal laws. If funds are disbursed by the City for use by an association, the association may be required to provide documentation of appropriate use. Failure to do so will result in removal of recognition. City Staff Liaison The City will provide a staff liaison to recognized neighborhood associations. The role of the staff liaison will be to: • Provide information about the role and organization of NAs, both generally and in direct consultation with residents, • Receive and process applications for recognition, • Ensure that the recognition requirements are met and notify the associations and City Manager of any shortcomings, • Maintain records related to NAs, • Work with the Communications and Information Technology Services Department to facilitate the communication activities outlined in this policy, • Develop and maintain a City speaker list and contact speakers upon request from a NA, • Educate City staff on the role of NAs and how to fully engage NAs as a valued resource, • Refer issues brought forward by NAs to appropriate staff, and • Advise the City Council on issues related to neighborhoods or NAs and draft or revise related policies. It is not the role of the City staff liaison to organize a neighborhood on behalf of .a proposed NA or to advocate positions on behalf of NAs. Communication Support The City's Communications and Information Technology Services Department will provide basic communication support to NAs to ensure that residents are aware of their existence within the community. The City shall not serve as the primary communication vehicle for civic neighborhood associations. The City encourages the use of social media as a relatively inexpensive and easy way for associations to promote communication between neighbors. Basic communication support from the City includes: • Landing page on the City's website: The landing page will include the neighborhood boundaries and notable features, bylaws, regular meeting place and time and neighborhood contact information. The page can also link users to a NA website or other online resource. Due to the volume of potential requests, City staff will not be able to customize the landing page to include updates about upcoming events or to post other documents. • Neighborhood -wide postcard mailings: The City will facilitate a neighborhood -wide postcard mailing notifying residents of a meeting to vote on the potential formation of a recognized neighborhood association.. Content must be delivered to the Communications and Information Technology Services Department at least 21 days in advance of the meeting date to ensure timely delivery. Postcard mailings will be addressed to "Resident ". • Copying Services: The City will provide copying annually for each association in an amount equivalent to the neighborhood's estimated population ( double- sided, on 8.5" by 11" paper). Associations should anticipate a 2 -3 day turnaround for each copying project. Associations can maximize the copy services provided by the City by using half sheet flyers. • Neighborhood listings: Active neighborhood associations and their contact information will be highlighted annually in About Town. Communication with the NA will not replace the City's traditional methods of direct outreach to residents. Any communication facilitated by the City is subject to the City's communication policies. As a result, the City will not facilitate any communication that is inconsistent with its policies or general operating principles. Examples of communication that would be inconsistent with City policies include items that are discriminatory or politically partisan in nature. Neighborhood Name Changes The City has defined names for each neighborhood. NA's may apply to change the name of the neighborhood within one year of recognition. After one year, the name of the neighborhood and corresponding NA cannot be changed. To apply for a name change, the NA must submit a request to the City staff liaison to change the neighborhood name along with the minutes from the meeting at which the organization's members voted to change the name and a summary of how the association collected data regarding the name preference of their neighbors. The City staff liaison will forward the request to the City Council for review. The City Council has the authority to approve or deny the change. Neighborhood Boundary Changes , The City has defined boundaries for each neighborhood. NAs may propose both technical corrections and neighborhood boundary changes. Technical Corrections. Technical corrections are minor changes regarding the placement of the boundary line on the map. For example, a technical correction could entail shifting a boundary line to include the properties on both sides of a street. Technical corrections impact a small number of properties. To apply for a technical correction to a neighborhood's boundary, the NA must submit the request to the City staff liaison along with the minutes and sign -in list from the meeting,at which the organization's members voted to make the change. The City staff liaison will forward the request to the NA(s) of any adjoining impacted neighborhoods for review and comment. The City staff liaison will forward the request and any comments from the adjoining impacted NA(s) to the City Council for review. The City Council has the authority to approve or deny the change. Boundary Changes. Boundary changes represent a larger change with respect to the geographic definition of the neighborhood. Boundary changes have the potential to impact a large number of properties. For example, a boundary change could entail moving the boundary from one street to another street located a few blocks away. In light of the significant public input process conducted by the City to arrive at the current neighborhood boundary map, the City will not consider boundary changes for a period of three years following the approval of this policy. For a change to be considered after that period, all of the neighborhoods impacted by the proposed change must have an active NA. To apply for a neighborhood boundary change, all of the impacted NAs must submit the request to the City staff liaison along,with the minutes and sign -in list from the meeting at which the organization's members voted to make the change. The City staff liaison will forward the requests to the City Council for review. The City Council has the authority to approve or deny the change. Guest Speakers The City will develop and maintain a list of City staff that can be scheduled as guest speakers by NAs. City staff may be available to speak on special topics by request. The guest speaker program is designed for education and information sharing purposes. Meeting Space Meeting space owned by the City and available for public use will be made available to NAs for meetings or events free to the public at no charge. If City staff are required to open or monitor the building, a recovery fee may be charged. City- sponsored meetings and programming will take precedent over NA meetings, and NA meetings may be "bumped" from a City facility with a minimum notice of one month. Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 La Frenz IDear Neighborhood Naming Committee, I received Josh Sprague's email update below in regards to the latest draft map for the Neighborhood Naming project, I would love to hear from you in regards to why you've made the decision to include our immediate area (south of 54th, east of France, west of Xerxes, and north of Minnehaha Creek in the "Chowen Park" Boundary in the NE Quadrant? I've previously sent email communication /comments, along with several of my neighbors who live in the area in regards to our input on the boundaries and names. We have not been contacted by any committee members. Did you canvas our area? I feel that our neighborhood has not been placed in the correct boundary. 1 feel it has a more natural affiliation with the Minnehaha Woods area vs. Chowen park. The creek, is a natural divider and our lives tend to gravitate towards the community to the West vs South. Concord is our neighborhood school to the West, whereas a portion of the Chowen park boundary is Creek Valley. Please reconsider the boundary for our area. If the boundary change will not be entertained, we strongly oppose the name Chowen Park; there are 2 parks in this boundary (York and Chowen), so why single out Chowen? Our area more frequently visits York Park. l would propose that you not use the name of a park - in reviewing the city wide map, our section is the only one that has multiple parks within the boundary, where you've selected one of the park names. As previously communicated via email, I really appreciate of the time and effort you have put into this. Our neighbors have actually had a lot of communication around this subject and we'd love to hear from you. Thank you, Teri LaFrenz 5400 Abbott Place 952 - 929 -1065 Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 Mark Mironer Hello. I just recently got caught up on the neighborhood discussion, and I have to say I'm disappointed. I live in the sliver of Edina north of 44th and east of Hwy 100 (on Mackey Ave), and 1 see that we were lumped in with Country Club. CC is such a well - known, self- identified and homogeneous area, it's hard to believe that the concerns of those of us in "Greater Country Club" will be,on anyone's mind. Hopefully, I'll be proven wrong, but I suspect that the CC folk will have much interest in hobnobbing with their country cousins. We would have been better off with the Todd Park group, which at least shares more common concerns. Thanks, Mark Mironer 4382 Mackey Ave Les Wanninger SE Quadrant is blah. Southdale /Galleria would be a better name. Whit 1 agree that the area north of the creek and east of France is a neighbhood. Not really hidden though. I like the idea of referencing the creek in the name. I had never heard of Chowen Park until this neighborhood discussion began. Ben Regarding Londonderry- the reason given for this name in the Dec. 4th recommendation is that it is taken from the Londonderry exit street and Londerry shopping mall. Of all the things our area could be named after- Bredesen, Nine Mile Creek, Walnut Ridge, Viking Hills, etc.- being named after a shopping complex seems really sad. Furthermore, the Londonderry mall /exit is in the far northwest corner of our gerrymandered group of neighborhoods- why was that chosen to represent 1500+ people, most of whom live nowhere near Londonderry? Please reconsider this name. Thanks for your efforts. Cindy Perusse I live on one of the three streets Killarney, View and Schaefer that form the horseshoe next to Bredesen Park. We are more identified with Parkwood Knolls then the Viking Hills neighborhood. My street View Lane and Schaefer Rd continue up into the Parkwood Knolls area. We take walks up our street and to Walnut Ridge Park all the time. Our little enclave is distinct in that it is surrounded on all sides by Bredesen Park. The only neighborhood we are geographically connected to is Parkwood Knolls. It makes more sense for Killarney, View and Schaefer to be included with the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood than Londonderry. Please reconsider the boundry for our neighborhood. Cindy Perusse My neighborhood consists of three streets, Killarney, View and Schaefer that form a horseshoe next to Bredesen Park. We are more geographically insulated than probably any other area of Edina. Our 60 +/- families are our own little neighborhood association. I put in my feedback and suggestion at one of the town meetings to name our 60 home neighborhood "Bredesen Park." If there is still time to redraw the proposed boundries then please consider naming our area "Bredesen Park." f� Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 Audre Gaer 1 have lived in various locations in Edina for 42 years and never felt the need for a neighborhood association. Thomas Cross Specific to the " Chowen Park" neighborhood, I'm curious as to why this name would be preferable to something that referenced either: 1) the creek, being the dominant topographical element, or 2) the larger of the two parks in this area (York Park). My opinion is that an arbitrary, nice - sounding phrase central to the creek would be greatly preferable. Surely this represents the neighborhood more aptly than a perfectly- pleasant- but - generally - unremarkable park. Thomas As I said before in one of the other discussion groups, I don't like the name "greater country club ". People in the country club neighborhood will continue to refer to their neighborhood as "Country Club" and the people in Sunnyslope will continue to refer to their neighborhood as "Sunnyslope ". The name "greater anything" sounds artificial, nobody wants to live in "greater anything ". If the idea is to come up with a minimum size of neighborhoods for the purpose of neighborhood associations that is just plain wrong. A neighborhood is a neighborhood, based on who neighbors associate with, and if I lived in Sunnyslope 1 would want an association of my neighbors, if any, not of Patricia some greater anything. I believe this effort by the city of Edina is to increase the concept of neighborhood. For us, this means north of the creek ]f you name this Chowen Park and include the area south of the creek, it does not relate to anyone in our nieghborhood. It may be efficient but it is not effective. Please reconsider the area west of Xerxes, south of 54th, north of the creek to be a name with the creek included. I believe several have requested Hidden Valley Creek ( from White's Hidden Valley. the original 1)rol)erty area KW Live in Todd Park - Feels like Rolling Green should be rolled into the neighborhood because we share many community concerns (flight path changes), traffic issues (Interlachen Blvd.), wetlands (Meadowbrook), shopping district (mostly Grandview) and elementary school (Highlands). As it stands, the Interlachen neighborhood seems oddly split, with western half more cohesive with President's neighborhood. Mary Swanson There are already two neighborhood associations in the Southwest Quadrant that I am aware of. In my opinion the area included is much too big for any sort of association. Where would they meet to discuss anything? In the school auditorium? I know the Cherokee Hills association takes turns meeting in different homes as their size makes it easy to know the neighbors on your streets close by and have them to your home. The number of residences included in the southwest quadrant (95 1) would never get together as a neighborhood group of any kind. For instance a Block Party would be im ossible. Mary Swanson I wish your website wasn't so difficult to navigate. I would be interested in hearing the responses from everyone in Edina, not just our quadrant. The dicussion page should include all of us. Audre Gaer Lake Cornelia is a much more acceptable name than Normandale for my neighborhood. The boundaries seem to be oka . Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 Babette Bean It is very difficult to sign in to the discussion on neighborhood association and "any other comments. The site is not very user friendly. That being said, I vote a resounding NO to any neighborhood naming and associations. Enough waste of time on this. We are the city of Edina. Please work on more important issues that make our city stand out amongst other cities. This will hurt our image -it is being proposed by a very small group of people that feel this need. It is not what we need or want Time to think forward, not backward. Please share with the city council, mayor and city government Look at what cities such as Wayzata re doing to beautify their cities and create city pride this is divisive. Thank you. Sincerely, Babette Bean 952- 924 -8722 Realtor, Chairmen's Circle www.The B eanTe am.EdinaRe alty.co m Whit They should definitely be called Neighborhood Associations and not Civic Neighborhood Associations. Thomas It looks to me that this could ea to another highly politicized o y that gets introduced into the po itica an scape. Even though the policy says that this is not intended to be the "sole" mechanism for seeking input, there is certainly the potential that a bunch of hyperactive neighbors with an agenda become the voice of the neighborhood by taking over the NA. We do have a mechanism in place for soliciting and receiving input on the part of city government, introducing another layer including some artificial boundaries (see my comment on the neighborhood maps) is unnecessary and wasteful. Audre Gaer I agree with Thomas. What is the purpose of these Neighborhood Associations supposed to be? 1 can understand why the people along 70th street organized to get their traffic issues addressed, but otherwise, what is the point? These NA's seem a little divisive and elitist If the purpose is to build community, then the community should be the City of Edina, not some artificial neighborhood designations. Paul Re penhagen Totally agree! No one is going to start calling Sunnyslope Greater Country Club. It sounds silly. I've seen maps that refer to the Golf Terrace neighborhood as Golf Terrace Heights. I like that name better than just Golf Terrace as Golf Terrace is a street name. Saying "1 live in Golf Terrace" sounds confusing and almost improper from a grammatical standpoint " I live in Golf Terrace Heights" sounds much more appropriate. Adding the word Paul Reppenhagen 'Heights' makes it sound more like a neighborhood name. Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 Mary Everett 1 respectfully ask that the City of Edina leave the neighborhoods named as they have been for many years as Edina is one of the most sought after areas already and changing names is something brought about by a small contingent of people and is unnecessary! I think our city counsel, mayor and employees could use their time in a far more efficient way than renaming neighborhoods that people don't want changed. People bought houses in neighborhoods and understand the perameters of them and they were satisfied with the names. 1 do not live in Rolling Green but I know exactly what the real estate situation is when someone refers to it. It is my understanding (as 1 example) that this would now be named "Todd Park" neighborhood. This will now include some of Edina's starter homes as well as some of Edina's largest and most expensive real estate. Why ?? What is being accomplished!! Please put your time to better use with something that really matters to the residents. I am getting tired of these VERY SMALL contingents of people making these huge changes that don't benefit most of the population of Edina. When you held the meeting for ALL residents, the consensus was DO NOT CHANGE the names. The only people wanting this are the ones bringing the idea forward!! LISTEN TO THE RESIDENTS. Thank you. Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 Bean I I write to ask the City Council and the Mayor. of Edina, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? The neighborhoods already have names. People know where Country Club, Rolling Green, South Harriet Park, Highlands, etc. are. Not only where they are, but what they are like. Do we really need to take people's time and energy to do something that's already done? I think-not. I also think the striping on Wooddale Avenue is one of the dumbest, ugliest, most useless waste of materials and personnel I have seen in a long time. And I was in the Army! Were bike riders being picked off once a week? Was there an unknown slaughter taking place on the infamous Wooddale Death Trail? NO! Of course, after watching several cars attempting to drive between the dotted lines (not everyone is familiar with Europe's goofy rules) and passing dangerously close to one another, we may yet have reason to assign extra patrols and ambulances to the Wooddale Avenue area. 1 do not believe that the naming of neighborhoods and the utterly idiotic painting of lines on a street that is safe in the first place - -these are not activities that the City Council or the Mayor should even consider. They are frivolous and wasteful and detract from the real work of city government As good as they are, our schools have serious problems with drugs and alcohol. Does the city have adequate senior housing. Are we pricing ourselves out of the real estate market to attract young families that breathe life into a community. I don't know, but if 1 recall correctly, I voted to elect a city government that would spend it's time studying these types of issues, NOT the trivia mentioned above. I also understand that at least one public meeting was held during which the majority present responded with a resounding NO when some of these off-the -wall ideas were proposed. You might want to listen to the residents- -ALL the residents - before you go off on these tangents. With money tight, I'd rather have another police officer or fireman than new names for established neighborhoods and ugly, confusing stripes on the roads. am more respectful than i sound, but also extremely frustrated with frivolity. Let's keep the focus on what's Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 Mary Swanson I don't think there are many people who are even aware of this. I believe that the only people who benefit are realtors. Are there any on this project? As I have said, the designated maps that a small group of people have put together will happen as you have not sent out any notifications. Sounds just like the airport map that just about passed with most of the people in Edina completely unaware of it. The small group that put this together will make it happen just the way they want it to. Most of the input I have read shows there are so many people that cannot even agree on the name of their neighborhood. I have said the groups are so large there is simply no way for them to get together. Cherokee Hills has a wonderful neighborhood group. Now that they are considered Indian Hills, can we all go to their parties? I am sure someone put much work in to this project with good intentions, but everyone in Edina should know about this before you do anything. I would hope that the meetings you have had would have at least a couple hundred of residents to give input Regards, Mary Swanson Babette Bean It is very difficult to sign in to the discussion on neighborhood association and any other comments. The site is not very user friendly. That being said, I vote a resounding NO to any neighborhood naming and associations. Enough waste of time on this. We are the city of Edina. Please work on more important issues that make our city stand out amongst other cities. This will hurt our image -it is being proposed by a very small group of people that feel this need. It is not what we need or want Time to think forward, not backward. Please share with the city council, mayor and city government Look at what cities such as Wayzata are doing to beautify their cities and create city pride ... this is divisive. Thank you. Lisa Eckert I've lived in Edina 56 years, grew up in Country Club and live in Golf Terrace Heights. I seriously question why you would spend time and energy and money on renaming neighborhoods. The consensus is thatyou don't have enough to do and perhaps you want to put up more signs to reflect the names? Where would the signs go now that we have all the biking and mile markers for the bikers. How about addressing the house on the northwest corner of 58th and Wooddale; an eyesore that has gone on long enough. There are residents that need help. Name your Neighborhood Comments received from December 4- January 16 Mary Swanson What will they do? The neighborhood groups are so large, with hundreds of people. Where would they meet to discuss and organize anything? A church or ?? I just can't imagine anything coming from this. I would appreciate someone tellinR us of the benefits of this project and what the positive results would be. Dick Crockett Those of us who live on Killarney, View Lane or Schaefer south of Vernon do not have any connection with the Londonderry name or area. A couple of us attended one of the earlier meetings and requested the name "Bredeson Park" for our area, since the Park and the related 9 -Mile Creek area bounds us on three sides. Please reconsider our request and provide us with a neighborhood name that has some meaning for us. Thank you. Mary Obrien 1 think the map is good but woud love to; see a name other than Brookview Heights .....Something shorter like Brook... Babette Bean "Not at all a good idea for the city and future well being of Edina- please vote against this and move forward with important issues." George Griffiths Most, if not all, Edina residential neighborhoods are currently identified by the legal subdivision names established at the time of construction approval. These names were and continue to be the building contracto's reference. If Edina neighborhoods are given arbitrary names, not based on current legal descriptions, what potential impact will this have on legal property identification? Thank you. IF Morningside Est Pop: 1852 Est Parcels: 700 Greater Country Club Presidents Interlachen _ = Est Pop: 1972 White Caks Est Pop: 919 u �— z Est Parcels: 692 p Est Pop: 474 a_. Est Pop: 422 Est Parcels: 437 Est Parcels: 208 Todd Park s Est Parcels: 179 Est Pop: 1168 Est Parcels: 399 50th and France =! Est Pop: 47 -+Est Parcels: 41 N Arden Park Est Units: 54 Grandview Est Pop: 1102 Est Pop: 1336 Est Parcels: 368 Est Parcels: 295 --` Parkwood Knolls i Golf Terrace � a-�a Est Pop: 1012 0 Est Pop: 2429 8 Est Parcels: 350 Est Parcels: 825 Highlands Est Po 1089 Fox Meadow p Est Parcels: 386 Minnehaha Woods 1 Est Pop: 687 u.. Est Parcels: 273 Est Pop: 1100 Est Parcels: 407 Melody Lake: 4` Est Pop: 1100 L r - -- Est Parcels: 402 Chowen Park Pame�a Par Est Pop: 1897 Est P.®p: 13 Est Parcels: 837 Es arcels• 27 y Countryside a Est Pop: 2134 -- Londonderry Est Parcels: 866 w.... Concord Strachauer Park Est Pop: 1503 + Birchcrest Est Pop:1530 ��� Est Pop: 822 Est Parcels: 411 MM W. I Est Pop: 1079 Est Parcels: 586 i Est Parcels: 310 Est Parcels: 399 i Normandale Park Est Pop: 1411 ti Est Parcels: 468 Creek Valley --- _ Indian Hills Est Pop: 915 Est Pop: 355 j Est Parcels: 165 Est Parcels: 370 Southdale Brookview Heights Est Pop: 2008 �k�,R The Heights Est Pop: 931 Est Po 1037 Lake Cornelia Est Parcels: 120 Est Par els: 361 Est Parcels: 352 Est Pop: 1667 1/ Est Parcels: 654 Indian Trails Est Pop: 515 1 j _ -• Est Parcels: 195 Pri enade Prospect Knolls _ Est 1007 Est Pop: 1259 Est rcels:27 Est Parcels: 380 - South Cornelia Est Units: 1049 _� Est Pop: 1403 -- - ` Braemar Hills ` Est Parcels: 482 _ Est Pop: 724 �i Cahill Edinboro gh Est Parcels: 311 c Est Pop: 0 Lake Edina Parklawn Est Pop: 125 cl Est Parcels: 102 Est Pop: 578 JEst Parcels: 25 Est Pop: 1133 Est Parcels: 53 - ( Est Parcels: 42 Est Units: 1701 Dewey Hill I Est Units: 450 j Est Pop: 1379- - - °- Penta on Park Cen ennial Lak L7--,- Est Parcels: 390 ` Est Pop: 0 EA P9p"�2 Est Parcels: 36 Est Par. els: 1 o e w9` A. V1 Communities 4 2 1 � ' a0 Visit SpeakupEdina.org . To provide additional feedback N W E S Engineering Dept October, 2012 i Presidents Interlachen Est Pop: 919 Est Pop: 474 , ... Est Parcels: 437 Shcrardnr Est Parcels: 208 _. dM Iru lanhcran _�;; � S Todd Park \ Est Pop: 1168 �l Est Parcels: 399 IFL _ _..._ Highlan L Lake Grandview __ - --- Est Pop: 1336 Est Parcels: 295 Parkwood Knolls ��- Est Pop: 2429 Est Parcels: 825 Public 4-4 Library 1� F�J Our Lady or Gmcc('hurch R School 1. Highlands / Est Pop: 1089 Fox Meadow Est Parcels: 386 i Highland Est Pop: 687 School Est Parcels: 273 Hawk _ take 1 i� Melody Lake �! Countryside cood Est Pop: 1100 Est Pop: 213�;°i1-1 Est Parcels: 402 Est Parcels: 866 w fir C7 H Countryside � - -- School {, Lgpdonderry E 'Po ` 1503 tagr <� Pdal B i rchc rest Est Parcels: 411 / e L� Est Pop: 1079 Est Parcels .399 , 1 DMud lake r – C-1 r. --� - -�_ Colonial - -- - -- Church Firc_ -- e St Alhons Jr iisii 1 jam. A. o e NW Neighborhood Communities k 2. 1, N �o Visit SpeakupEdina.org To provide additional feedback N W+ E S Engineering Dept October. 2012 � Calvin Choatiw. r--- --- sehad— Cw.ld. Ycm Monlcssor Morniggside F Est PdpTI-052 Est Par`ce`ls: 700 White Oaks Greater Country Club Est Pop: 422 -_ Est Pop: 1972 Est Parcels: 179 -; Est Parcels: 692 is - slslCldcaa 50th and France i _ ea.�Pai Est Pop: 47 r _ Est Parcels: 41 Est nits: 54 G ty M,,r Hall halo C h( Golf Terrace Est Pop: 1012 Est Parcels: 350 Nonnmdale • Elmicniary 1 Sowhvlcw Jr High Edna C.--ay Ccntcr �j Ccnwrd JI schooi Concord Est Pop: 1530 Est Parcels: 586 cam Park Baost Arden Park Est Pop: 1102 Est Parcels: 368 1 rh „rah i i Edtna Corn —iLy Lua.crm Church Minnehaha Woods Est Pop: 1100 St Pctcrs Luihmn Church R School J Est Parcels: 407 i .. w. q - 1 - Chowen Park - Est Pop: 1897 ` Est Parcels: 837 J..1 -' Pamela Park Est Pop: 1329 Est Parcels: 527 -1 _ I Lake \ Pamcla j I Strachauer Park Est Pop: 822 Est Parcels: 310 N ow9e r�� NE Neighborhood Communities W E Visit SpeakupEdina.org S To provide additional feedback Engineering Dept October, 2012 Good o e w9eA.. SW Neighborhood Communities En w Visit SpeakupEdina.org To provide additional feedback nn ncr N W E S Engineering Dept October, 2012 aw9e f� SE Neighborhood Communities 0 Visit S eaku Edina.or p p 9 To provide additional feedback N W E S Engineering Dept October, 2012 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:55 PM To: Karen M. Kurt Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification `. ry Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 I Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ( 1 IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov t ...Foi Living, Learning, Raising Fatuities & . Doing Business From: Claire Dempsey jmailto:dempseymn @aol.coml Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:24 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Identification Hi, I am a Country Club resident and think that including Sunnyslope in a "Greater Country Club" neighborhood name designation is confusing. Why can't Country Club just stay "Country Club" and Sunnyslope be called "Sunnyslope "? My guess is that the Sunnyslope people would like to keep their identity as well. In addition, because of the way the creek flows, you can't easily drive from one side of the "Greater Country Club Neighborhood" to the other -- this could be very confusing for motorists not familiar with the area. Also the title "Greater Country Club Neighborhood" sounds pompous -- like it is greater (ie better) than everyone else. I realize that this is not what is intended by the use of the word "greater" but it does seem to me that it will spawn all kinds of jokes and comments.... Thank you, Claire Dempsey 4624 Browndale Susan Howl P From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:45 PM To: Karen M. Kurt Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 It Ibiunno(d)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, arninj, Raising Families & Doing Business f; b 6 6 From: Barb Rothmeier Imailto :brothmeierCa�comcast.net] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:16 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Identification Quick comment re: Country Club As 20 plus resident of Country club neighborhood.. call it'Country Club' Nobody is ever going to say 'Greater Country Club' their own designation, as they are literally 'across the creek.' Has anyone asked them? Barb Rothmeier 4500 Arden Ave. if new boundaries will include streets of'Sunnyslope' I would still just Also wondering if Sunnyslope people want this -- -maybe they like 9 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 10:22 AM To: Karen M. Kurt Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 -; Ibiunno6EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Bitsiness From: kathbegley6&aol.com jmailto:kathbegley(abaol.coml Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 10:05 AM To: Edina Mail; Joyce Repya Subject: Neighborhood Identification Dear Edina officials: NO to the "Greater Country Club" name. Country Club's name should remain the same. Sunnyslope neighborhood should be called just that, Sunnyslope neighborhood. As for other neighborhoods without a known distinct name... they can figure that out themselves. Country Club already has an established name and everyone knows where it is. This naming stuff is NOT a priority and let's not reinvent the wheel. Keep the names the same as it has always been. Frankly, I am more concerned about the ENORMOUS house being built behind me on W. 45th street. So enormous that the Star Tribune featured a picture of it in Sat. Jan 12th Twin Cities section. It makes me want to move, blocks my elderly neighbors morning sun ( the Jaimesons, Richard has lived in this house his whole life and he's in his 80s), is set back too far as to make it look odd, is too close to the property lines and s0000 tall. Why does a house need a 12+ foot attic ? ? ?? Even the construction worker thought it was crazy. Are they eventually going to add a third story? 4500 square feet on a narrow long lot is RIDICULOUS. ( That's all this family "needs ", and I am quoting the new owner. " Seriously..... does anyone really "NEED" 4500 square feet." I'm bummed out. Thanks for listening, Kathy Begley Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:18 AM To: Susan Howl Cc: Karen M. Kurt Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 �F11 `` IbiunnoCrDEdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov 'tl I ` ...For. Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Miriam Stake [mailto:stakefamC�gmail.coml Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:37 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Identification Dear Hope, As a Country Club resident, I am wondering how the naming project would affect the Historic District classification of the country club neighbor as well as building requirements in the neighborhood. Miriam Stake 4617 Edina Blvd Susan Howl Subject: RE: Neighborhood naming (one more thing) Karen - Sent a note to the mayor as well. Please note that I do not care if Sunnyslope or any other adjacent area is or is not included under a country club banner, It makes no difference to me personally. I am not interested in creating segregated areas within Edina. We do not need neighborhood associations and if we need to develop better lines of communication with residents then the city should focus on that. It seems like there are so many value add projects the city should be working on that this would not be at all on the prioritization list of things we should be focused on. Roisin Laskin From: KKurt(&EdinaMN.gov To: ralaskin(a)hotmaii.com CC: showMEdinaMN.gov Subject: RE: Neighborhood naming Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:52:04 +0000 Roisin, Thank you for your feedback regarding the proposed Greater Country Club neighborhood. Your email has been forwarded to the City Council for their consideration. A public hearing on the proposed neighborhood names and boundaries will also be held during the Tuesday, January 22 council meeting. The meeting starts at 7pm. Have a good weekend and stay warm! Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager 952- 826 -0415 i Fax 952 - 826 -0390 I KKurt(aDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living. Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From:.The Laskins [mailto:rglaskin(&hotmail.coml Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood naming We live in Country Club and do not wish to have the "name" changed. Personally I cannot even believe a moment of time is spent on such a ridiculous activity .... are we at a point that there is so little to do in City Hall that naming areas is a priority. This is extremely disappointing. Perhaps more energy should have been put onto better understanding of the MAC proposed changes!! Roisin Laskin 4500 Edina Blvd. 1 Susan Howl, From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:21 AM To: Susan Howl Cc: Karen M. Kurt Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 i Fax 952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoOEdinaMN.gov i.www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Melissa Freeland [ mailto :melissamfreeland(&yahoo.coml Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Identification Greater Country Club? Really? Country Club is an historic district and is architecturally unique in our city. In fact the homes within the district have restrictions in order to preserve the unique nature of the neighborhood. The neighborhood and it's name are well recognized in our community. The Sunnyslope neighborhood is a distinct area, dissimilar to Country Club and should remain so in naive. We are opposed to merging the 2. The current effort to expand the naming of neighborhoods within Edina has often referenced the sense of community found within the neighborhoods that do already identify themselves with a name - Country Club or Morningside for example. Why would you even consider merging two neighborhoods that aren't even connected? They are physically separated by the mill pond. Don't undo the unique neighborhood that began the tradition of creating a close knot community. Follow our example but don't change us in the process! Jon and Melissa Freeland 4404 Sunnyside Road Edina, MN 55424 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:22 AM To: Joyce Repya; Susan Howl Cc: Karen M. Kurt Subject: FW: Fwd: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 I Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCZDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Bmsiness From Jane Lonnquist [ mailto :ijlonnquist(aearthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fw: Fwd: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood Please forward this questions to Joyce Repya in Planning and Hope Melton of the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee Would the neighborhood renaming posed below change the Plan of Treatment for building in the historic Country Club District? Would the expanded neighborhood boundary threaten Country Club's status on the National Register for Historic Preservation? Hope, can you please let me know how to find more information on the City's website? Neither of the links below worked. What is the rationale for combining two very distinctly defined neighborhoods into one? Thank you, Jane Lonnquist 4510 Drexel Ave. - - - -- Forwarded Message---- - From: Miriam Stake Sent: Jan 17, 2013 9:38 PM To: Jane Lonnquist , Mary Lou Lamberton Subject: Fwd: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood I have not been tuned into this renaming project issue. Not sure why this is happening. Mimi Stake ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message --- - - - - -- From: < countryclubdistrict (a),g mail. com> Date: Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:28 PM Subject: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood To: stakefam(c-).g mail. com The City Council is holding a public hearing January 22nd at 7:00 PM regarding the "Name Your Neighborhood" final report, which was prepared by the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee appointed by the city council. Under the proposal, the Country Club neighborhood would be expanded to include what is now known as the Sunnyslope neighborhood, and would be referred to as the "Greater Country Club Neighborhood ". See map. For further information regarding the neighborhood naming project click here. Questions or comments can be directed to Mayor Hovland, the City Council, and /or the committee chair, Hope Melton, all through mail(d,)EdinaMN.gov. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:23 AM To: Susan Howl Cc: Karen M. Kurt Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification Lynette Biunno, Receptionist !14 952 - 927 -8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 I;t ,';titiC_ '� �_•,.; Ibiunnona.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Mary Shannahan [mailto:mishanny(aDaol : coml Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:02 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Identification I am writing to vehemently request that you do NOT merge the Country Club neighborhood, as it currently stands, with the Sunnyslope area under the new name of Greater Country Club Area. This would greatly diminish the historic Country Club area. It is well know and readily identified today. The new area with a similar name would be quite confusing. People will wonder is this still the same .area with a new name? Or, a completely separate area? Country Club is one of the original parts of Edina history. Why would you want to destroy this? It is also unique and has very specific guidelines to preserve its uniqueness. Please leave this intact. There is no reason to disrupt our neighborhood's identity. If you want all neighborhoods to have an identity then, let each area create their own. We have an identity with a very rich history. Please honor it. Mary Shannahan A Country Club Resident Susan Howl Subject: Re: Neighborhood Identification Country Club Neighborhood After hearing about the proposed name change for CCN and Sunnyslope I responded to the city, then sat down to email my neighbors. I could easily come up with 43 people in my neighborhood - I know them and have contact info for them because they are my neighbors. I only know one person in the Sunnyslope area well enough to have contact information for them. Their child went to school with mine. I do not know their neighbors in Sunnyslope, because these two neighborhoods are not one and the same!!! The individuals who live there are fellow Edinans but I don't know them the way I know my neighbors in CCN. Name them separately for the individual neighborhoods that they are and respect the fact that they each already have identities and names. This project is NOT about re- naming neighborhoods, it is about creating names for neighborhoods that don't already have a name. Trudie Sprenkle Country Club Neighbor - - - -- Original Message---- - From: " Trudie Sprenkle, MD" <tsprenkl @pipstop.com> To: mail @EdinaMN.gov Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:23:27 -0600 Subject: Neighborhood Identification > Re: the proposal to name neighborhoods • The Country Club neighborhood is an historic district and is • architecturally unique in our city. The neighborhood and it's name • are well recognized in our community. The Sunnyslope neighborhood is • a distinct area, dissimilar to Country Club and should remain so in > name. I am opposed to merging the 2. • The current effort to expand the naming of neighborhoods within Edina • has often referenced the sense of community found within the • neighborhoods that do already identify themselves with a name - > Country Club or Morningside for example. Why would you even consider • messing with the name of one of the first neighborhoods to begin that • tradition? Follow our example but don't change us in the process! > Mark and Trudie Sprenkle > 4636 Casco Ave Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:27 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Name Your Neighborhood Recomendations Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 -927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(a)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: mishannyl(aaaol.com jmailto:mishanny1Cabaol.comj Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:34 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Name Your Neighborhood Recomendations To: Mayor Jim Hovland Dear Jim: Having recently been informed of the upcoming recommendation that we rename and expand the Country Club neighborhood to include the Sunnyslope neighborhood, I find myself asking a simple question, why? First the existing Country Club neighborhood is a designated historical district with specific historical ties to Edina Country Club; Sunnyslope has neither of these distinctions. Additionally, the existing Country Club area has sidewalks, highly regulated building codes creating a homogenic atmosphere and a social climate that is built on the ability to easily walk throughout the entire neighborhood. Sunnyslope shares none of this with the existing Country Club area. I have nothing against the Sunnyslope area, it is a nice place and I have friends that live in that neighborhood. That being said, the area is not part of the Country Club district. The simple fact that you can't get from the existing Country Club neighborhood to the Sunnyslope neighborhood without leaving the neighborhood itself makes that somewhat self evident. Tim Shannahan 4520 Casco Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Susan Howl Subject: Neighborhood Identification Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council and Hope Melton, I am writing you regarding the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee and its plans. I live at 4615 Browndale Avenue in the "Country Club" neighborhood and understand that you are considering expanding the territory to include roads including Sunnyslope Road under your new mapping system with a new name of the "Greater Country Club Neighborhood ". I have been too busy working and raising a family and was unaware of your plans, for which I do not understand the need. The city of Edina should not engage in such matters and the naming and boundaries of neighborhoods should be left to home owners and any associations that they may form. In addition, how could roads on the other side of Minnehaha Creek be included in the Country Club neighborhood? There is absolutely no access between these neighborhoods. The Country Club neighborhood boundaries are obvious and historically referenced: Sunnyside Road to the north, Arden Avenue to the east, Country Club Road to the south, and Browndale Avenue and Edgebrook Place to the west. (A map is attached for your reference.) Importantly, the character of the Sunnyslope neighborhood is completely different from that of the Country Club neighborhood. More importantly, home owners should not make a big deal about their neighborhood or any (self) perceived status associated with it. I implore you to minimize the use of government resources for this project (cancelling it would be optimal) to alleviate the high burden that is already placed on tax payers. Please leave such matters to the citizens of Edina. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Mark Newsome 4615 Browndale Avenue Edina, MN 55424 952- 513 -7640 1 4� > YV s �± .h e ,I f �b .w..• n W .�... n • � y 4'•f }N �.Ip4� r fry: Sr W tin ,C y Rr .'i W • I S a6 r in nrti h •,: 51 W I w. w ".@A 1 NCO 1 Attached are copies of Name your Neighborhood correspondence received after the packet went out on January 18, 2013. Ariel Klugman Subject: FW: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood - Why? From: Scott Neal Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 10:12 PM To: Karen M. Kurt Subject: Fwd: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood - Why? FYI Sent fiom my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: <emergent c,visi.com> Date: January 21, 2013, 10:10:43 PM CST To: <jhovIand(2akrausehovl and. com >, <snealnaEdinaMN.gov> Cc: "'mail a,EdinaM.N.gov. "' Subject: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood - Why? Good evening Mayor Hovland and Mr. Neal, This past November we corresponded regarding the FAA's PBN (Performance Based Navigation) flight routes and procedures. Thankfully you were able to help influence the MAC to suspend a decision on of the program until June 2014 for Edina. I'm writing today to with similar purpose —to preserve my neighborhood. I understand the City Council will consider changing the name of the Historic Country Club District to Greater Country Club while artificially combining it with the Sunnyslope neighborhood. I am opposed to this action and hope you will strongly consider the views of me and my neighbors. My objections are as follows: 1. We already have an active neighborhood association: The City website states that "Edina has begun the process to identify and name neighborhoods within the City to support the formation of neighborhood associations." We already have a very active neighborhood association. When I saw the signs for the project, I wrongly assumed my neighborhood wasn't included because it was already established. 2. The residents actively work to preserve its uniqueness: Only our neighborhood has preservation standards making it unique. We actively work to ensure its preservation and fight those who wish to denigrate it (e.g. build houses with inferior products). We residents in the neighborhood have just invested in street signs, crosswalks, and sidewalks to preserve the heritage —at our own expense. Will the city refund the costs we've incurred to preserve its uniqueness? 3. Our neighborhood has a unique heritage it does not share with any other: Our neighborhood was added to the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places in 1980. The surrounding neigh` - orhoods were not included in this designation for the same reasons they should not be combined today. 4. The two neighborhoods are physically disconnected: While we share the creek as a natural boundary, we are physically disconnected from each other. They were created in different times in our City's history. I fail to see the value in artificially making them one 90 years later. 5. Historic Country Club residents don't want to be combined with Sunnyslope: I have yet to hear or read of my neighbors supporting this action. Why? We invest our time, energy, and incomes to preserve our already established neighborhood. Why does the Council feel it needs to go against the will of the people? 6. Use of City resources: I have a hard time understanding why the City feels it is a prudent use of time and money to pursue this action as it pertains to the Historic Country Club District. Does the city realize how active we already are? It is creating an issue where there doesn't need to be one. 7. Our ability to effectively lobby against the FAA's PBN (Performance Based Navigation) plans for a super sky highway: I believe Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act provides a leverage point for Edina. Combining the Historic Country Club District with other neighborhoods sends the message to the FAA and MAC that it is not important to our City's heritage or future. Thank you for reviewing this email. Sincerely, Don Don McCormick 4523 Casco Avenue "Historic Country Club District" 612- 210 -3463 emergent(o)-visi.com Ariel Klugman rom: Sent: Subject: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:29 AM FW: Neighborhood Naming This message has been forwarded to the City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood - naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 ekastnerf2,EdinaMN gvv I www.EdinaMN.Vov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rob Webb [mailto•rob.webb]998@gmail.coml Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 6:24 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Naming This letter was sent to me by a resident, I presume she intended for it to be shared with the applicable people within the city: I will be out of town all week, but wish to express the following views. 1 oppose city government participating in the formation and governance of neighborhood associations. I oppose adding the Sunnyslope neighborhood to the current Country Club neighborhood and renaming it the Greater Country Club Neighborhood. I do not want another layer of representation representing my views. I oppose renaming neighborhoods that have had their current name for decades. Lois Petersen 4604 Casco Ave Edina 55424 Sent from my iPad Ariel Klugman rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:57 AM Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification This message has been forwarded to the City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood - naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastner(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov Fur Living, Learning, liaising l amilics Doing Business From: Dave Boss Lmailto:DBoss(d)gopco.com1 Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:27 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Identification Dear City Council Members, I am against combining the Country Club and Sunnyslope neighborhood names into one ... I can't figure out what the benefit would be and it would certainly add confusion and be misleading. Dave Boss 4620 Browndale Ave Dave Boss i Principal is :.. ... .: ........ .i4 .. _ ;_. .. .._ ,._.. ... C) GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS ,:ii Ariel Klugman From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:00 AM Subject: FW: Neighborhood Association Policy -input from a traveler Attachments: Reject. Neighborhood. Association. PoI icy. LSandy.01.21.13.docx Expires: Saturday, July 20, 2013 12:00 AM This message has been forwarded to the City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood - naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952 -826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 �f ekastnero@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning,, Rai•m Fatnilie, �ti Doing Bin From: Sandy, Lewis G [mailto:lewis g sandyC uhg.coml Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 2:25 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: kathymsandyCfxahoo.com Subject: Neighborhood Association Policy -input from a traveler To the Mayor and Members of the City Council: I'm traveling on business this week, so am unable to attend the Council's Jan 22 meeting where the Neighborhood Association Policy will be discussed. I'm sure you will get an earful on names and boundaries, but my focus is why the City should do this at all. PI see my attached short letter expressing my views, and recommending the Council reject the program. Thank you. Lewis G. Sandy MD 4800 E. Sunnyslope Road Edina MN 55424 (952) 942 -6122 This e -mail, including attachments, may include confidential and /or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e -mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e -mail is prohibited. If you have received this e -mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e -mail immediately. Dear Members of the Edina City Council, Please REJECT the recommendations related to the Neighborhood Boundaries and Names and the related Neighborhood Association Policy. Further, I believe the entire initiative is out of scope and inappropriate for the City of Edina staff and our local government, so efforts to refine or improve the program should not proceed. Please just stop this program. Why? Because at its core, this effort fundamentally misunderstands the proper roles of formal government and informal, voluntary associations. As noted by de Tocqueville and many others, Americans are unique in their enthusiasm for coming together to form voluntary associations outside of formal government structures. These associations; by definition, are grassroots efforts, led by groups of people coming together on their own. The proposed Neighborhood Association Policy is the exact opposite of this approach, creating a new role for the City in "recognizing" and "approving" not only the formation of local neighborhood groups, but also the rules, policies, and specifications for these Neighborhood Associations. While many people will have issues with the Neighborhood Boundaries and Names (as I do), I am far more concerned about the basic premise and rationale for the Neighborhood Association Policy, not to mention the additional work that the City would undertake. Simply put, this program is duplicative of the existing processes of local government, would take staff time and City resources to implement, and is potentially divisive to local neighborhoods. Lastly, what problem is this elaborate program (with 35 different maps created during the planning phase alone) targeted to solve? Various neighborhoods around Edina already have voluntary associations up and running, so if the City thinks these are worthy of spread, why not just let people know about them and let people connect and share ideas and best practices on their own? Why should valuable City of Edina staff time be devoted to reviewing bylaws, making "technical corrections" to maps and the like? Local government needs to work smarter, on high priority issues, not take on new ancillary programs such as this. So in summary, I agree with someone else's comment that this entire program is a "solution in search of a problem ". Please close it down. Sincerely, Lewis G, Sandy MD 4800 E. Sunnyslope Road (952) 942 -6122 Adel Klugman rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013.9:02 AM Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification Concerns This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff Raison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intem. ;•f = -;:; Emilie Knetner, Communications Assistant 9624LU-0342 I Fax 9824LIG -0389 I'wrmEdh MN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Fantoles & Doing Business From: Brett ,R,Fenskefi1wellsfargo.eomT [inallbo•Brett R Fensk@wellstargo.coml Sent: Monday,-January 21, 20131:16 PM To: Edina Mail; fenske8awest.net ' Cc:. Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonlbennett12Qeomca%net: joshsRragueCiedinarealtv_�; swensonanni�gmall.aom Subject: Neighborhood Identification Concerns Please forward this e-mail to all members of the City Council and Mayor Hovland: Dear Council Members, I am writing you this email to voice my concern as to the renaming of our historic neighborhood. As a resident of the Country Club district, I appreciate the Historic aspect of our neighborhood. Our neighborhood is unique In not only its history but we are also subject-to unique sets of rules that apply only to us. Building codes, historic preservation, lot coverage regulations, etc.. I do not think it would be appropriate nor necessary to combine the Country Club District and the Sunnyslope neighborhood Into one "greater country club" neighborhood. This makes about as much sense as the-bike lanes on Wooddale Ave. Please vote against this. Thank you, Brett & Heather Fenske 4504 Drexel Ave. 952 -922 -5104 A'f i ENTI ')N: THI$ E- 1 -AA11. MAY BE AN ADVERTISEMENT OR S01.iCITATION FOR PRODUCTS AND SERVICE a from? n•,arkeling e•n :file frr,.r.. • p•; :..1.. ,:;�i:r: sdc::NS ;'.vg,. AC•r:sr.: ,!::7r rit;I ad. of 1r..'Cly ED onF, of I'I'',f'ri Pi - tnAhli and type MJ�i � +!!P, •'. : s.•Y'• riid r:$ yffltl'el'.r, [I: •'. r: ^.:: �1!N B: I .. 1 o •? r le' -:y WP: afar; t servics ,nessi ,• . irm., rLI... L, ri 'r3:i ::4:r: i:� i WE' :nay nerey I : wa yo.. or i Blr1: C''7• H8 Val. 1'?ay r •iei: i)•RV;o•: �:.r $Ri `•:i D(tlt:l' eiy:i ;:: ie:'V:'.'.� r •1r 9i':�7th:t:31 I:7lpYR13lN7f: 'Patti "v:E ",: f:U: eleC;4:0W C0'ii::'AiLll'61: pOPCIA- V:oir Ii7,• ^sln a : � ri srs r• :: ss ani: r.+; rl •:r,t_ p:odf, _; sit; :w.:'i F,,1:1:R=r•F:;:'. �i�p ryf:.r.r ;A ;. ;1�i- :' fF.i L: - VALIii: !-wm1r,,cwnl protess(onals Ere registf.re.1 repirsenlarn�s of Wetlj Faigo Adk,af;. LL;: n iegister_d broker dealer and a separa'a 'ion ball• WIWI li• ol1Ne -114 1'a ".,,:l "•if.ii ;a•r ". I! ;k'.= /,'-;.ipe 1 t:(I:lii Jeffr:i aol, & I -aaUs. Mri 15.1r3,+ Ariel Klugman rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:08 AM Subject: FW: "Greater" Country Club This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952 -826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 l' ekastneraOEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Busines From: Kevin Tauer Lmailto•kmtauer(cbhotmail.coml Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: "Greater" Country Club Mayor Hovland, I am unable to attend the public hearing Tuesday night as I am out of town but please take this as my opposition to this new city initiative and the additional cost it will generate (paid by us, of course). I am especially opposed to the creation of a new neighborhood called "Greater Country Club." One of the reasons we moved here ten years ago was to be part of a historic neighborhood and this change would weaken the historic designation of Country Club. This must be stopped. Thank you. Kevin Tauer 4605 Drexel Avenue Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:42:09 -0600 Subject: More Information on Neighborhood Association Process To: kmtauer(ahotmail.com From: countryclubdistrictoa gmail.com Many people have inquired about the city's neighborhood naming and association plans. Based on the information available, the neighborhood initiative goes beyond just naming neighborhoods. It represents an expansion of city government, and another layer of representation for all Edina citizens. The city is moving to establish and "recognize" Neighborhood Associations that meet the city's criteria. According to information provided by the city, these Neighborhood Associations will have elected officers and byiaws, and will be a source of input on long -term area plans, requests for zoning changes, street redesign or reconstruction, park redesign or reconstruction. • According to the city, the Neighborhood Associations will be allowed to represent the neighborhood when communicating resident ideas and concerns to the neighborhood, and may communicate the need for input on city matters. The Neighborhood Associations are additive, and do not eliminate current sources of resident input to the city processes. The city has initiated the formation of the Neighborhood Associations. A committee of residents has proposed names and boundaries for the Neighborhood Associations that will represent the residents for that area. The neighborhood that contains the Country Club neighborhood as it is currently defined is the "Greater Country Club" neighborhood. It includes what is now known as the Country Club neighborhood, the Sunnyslope neighborhood, houses on 44th street, and houses on 50`h street. According to the city, it includes 692 homes, representing around 2,000 people. Currently, Country Club and Sunnyslope have groups that organize communications, directories, and events. The Country Club group has included several homes on 50`h Street, at their request. Neither the Country Club or Sunnyslope groups make any attempt to represent the views of the neighborhood residents on city matters, nor is there any interest to do so. In their criteria for determining their neighborhood boundaries, the city's committee stated that they considered common interests based on geography, size, natural boundaries, roadways, access, current neighborhood associations, history, distinct features, and other criteria. Yet, the "Greater Country Club" definition includes neighborhoods that are not connected by residential roadways and are separated by a waterway, and have very different traffic patterns, street design, architectural restrictions, history, and other elements. This level of variation will make it difficult to accomplish the objective of gaining cohesive neighborhood representation. The questions for the residents at the upcoming public hearing on this subject include whether residents want the city government participating in the formation and governance of neighborhood associations, whether residents want another layer of representation and politics to represent their interests, whether residents agree with how the city has defined the neighborhoods, and the process for implementation. The public hearing is this Tuesday, January 22 "d at 7:00 at City Hall. Ariel Klugman rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:15 AM Subject: FW: Opposition to "Greater Country Club Neighborhood" Proposal This message has also been forwarded to the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort, and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant '. 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ry. ekastnercD-EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing, Business From: Kristin Pierre [mailto:kristinpierre comcast.netl Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:43 AM To: Edina Mail; jhovlanclOUrausehovland.com; jonibennettl2(a)comcast.net; ioshsprague(a)edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle; swensonannl(agmail.com Subject: Opposition to "Greater Country Club Neighborhood" Proposal Dear Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee, Mayor Hovland, and City Council members, We understand that one of the purposes of "Name Your Neighborhood" is to create neighborhood designations for unnamed areas of Edina. Therefore, we were surprised to learn of your proposal to combine two neighborhoods that are currently recognized as "Sunnyslope" and "Country Club" into one neighborhood proposed to be named the "Greater Country Club Neighborhood." Each neighborhood already has its own name, identity, cohesive neighborhood, signs and neighborhood association. Why attempt to undo neighborhoods that already exist and have separately achieved the goals that you are attempting to promote? And, importantly, the entire Edina Country Club District is listed on the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places, and is under the oversight of the Edina Historical Preservation Board. Changing the neighborhood designation would be confusing and would dilute the effort to retain the heritage of the 550+ homes that have historically comprised the Country Club neighborhood. We oppose the current proposal and request that the Steering Committee and City Council amend the proposed plan to allow each neighborhood to maintain their current designations as separate entities of "Sunnyslope" and "Country Club" neighborhoods. Sincerely, Kristin and Matt Pierre 4618 Bruce Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Ariel Klugman From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:17 AM Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 ekastner @DEdinaMN.gov I www.EdiiiaN4N.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: larry seckingerniuno.com [mailto:larry seckingernjuno.com Sent: Monday, .lanuary 21, 2013 11:03 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: countryclubdistrictngmail.com Subject: Neighborhood Identification Ms. Melton, How does the changing of the boundaries of the Country Club Historic area to the boundaries of the "Greater Country Club" area affect the current designation of the current Country Club Historic area on the national register of historic areas. We believe that if our current area is removed from the national register, we have a major problem with your proposed change. Also, the proposed addition of the homes in the Sunnyslope area does not reflect a similar architectural compatability with our neighborhood. Larry and Sue Seckinger 4912 Sunnyside Road Edina, MN 55424 651- 247 -5022 Ariel Klugman From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:46 AM Subject: FW: Attention City Council re: Neighborhoods This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. J. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastnerCQEdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov - For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doug Business From: Kitty O'Dea [mailto:kodea.mn()gmail.coml Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:32 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: daniel and cheryl dulas; Ann Wordelman; robwebb@comcast.net Subject: Attention City Council re: Neighborhoods Dear Council - I wanted to put my two cents in on the proposed establishment of neighborhood associations in Edina. I've listed the pros and cons of the proposal being discussed on Tuesday. Pros 1. Having neighborhood designations is fine. Based on the initiative of some neighbors we have a website and neighborhood events. The website also provides a conduit for City and community information that is distributed via e -mail. Its a nice way for people to connect. Cons: 1. Requiring elected members and bylaws is heavy handed and not needed. The CCNA is a voluntary organization targeted at building community and providing information., We have chosen to NOT formalize beyond that. The leadership is not interested in "representing" the neighborhood. Their role is to provide information and let the individual HH's make their own decisions. Neighborhoods should have the freedom to organize (or not) as they wish. 2. There is absolutely no reason to combine existing neighborhoods. I haven't been following this issue because I live in a named neighborhood and "assumed" that we wouldn't be affected. My mistake. If I lived in Sunnyslope, an established neighborhood with tight community and stone entrance signs, I would be furious about being included in the "Greater Country Club" neighborhood. There is nothing "Greater" about Country Club. Plus there is no physical connection between the two neighborhoods. Furthermore, when the city did the street swear work, Country Club and Sunnyslope were not lumped together. 3. Country CLub has a historic designation. Let's not confuse that by increasing the area to include non - protected areas. I What is the objective of creating neighborhood designations? According to the September 12 , 2012 presentation, the City's objective was to identify and name neighborhoods, develop policies to interact with the neighborhoods and VOLUNTARILY form community associations. Somewhere along the way, the committee went beyond its charter and is requiring formation of neighborhood associations. While Morningside went that route and it works for them, other neighborhoods have organized differently (e.g., CCNA). Neither is better than the other, each neighborhood chose what worked for that neighborhood. Please don't add a layer of bureaucracy unless the neighborhood choses to do so. littp://ediiiaiiiii.gov/edinaliles/files/AboLit Edina /Nei�,,hborhoodProposedMaps N1SC %20Third %20Meetins, %20 y %202 .pdf Thanks Kitty Ariel Klugman ;rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: -Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:05 AM Subject: FW: Neighborhood Identification This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. _ Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 ekastnerna EdinaMN.gov I www.EdingN4 zov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ann Cleveland f mailtowheathcote2aol.com Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 12:00 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Identification why don't you just call it Sunnyslope since that is what everyone knows it as and they have a sign saying such as you enter....why create confusion? clear example of over - thinking... Ariel Klugman rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:30 AM Subject: FW: Country Club- neighborhood This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 i Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastnerna.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Busines s From: Jen Dewing [mai Ito: jendewing(ftahoo.coml Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:55 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Jeff Dewing Subject: Country Club- neighborhood I am writing to request that the City of Edina does not combine the "Sunnyslope" neighborhood and the current "Country Club" neighborhood into one neighborhood called "Greater Country Club ". The current Country Club neighborhood has a distinct history and architectural design. I feel "Sunnyslope" and "Country Club" are too dissimilar to be considered the same neighborhood. We hope you we keep "Country Club" as -is and honor its heritage. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Jennifer Dewing Country Club Neighborhood resident 4526 Casco Ave. Ariel Klugman rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:32 AM Subject: FW: Naming of neighborhood- This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952- 826 0389 ekastner(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kirsten Rewey [mailto•kirsten scott@earthlink.netl Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:35 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Naming of neighborhood.. Dear City Council Members - We strongly oppose the report's recommendation to combine the Country Club and Sunnyslope neighborhoods into one area called "Greater Country Club." The Edina Country Club District is filled with distinct and historic homes. To combine Sunnyslope into our "neighborhood" is misleading and untrue. Please consider our request and know that if more people were aware of this recommendation you would be getting an overwhelming response in opposition. It is concerning that this has not been better publicized to our neighborhood since it impacts us directly. Sincerely, Kirsten & Scott Rewey Ariel Klugman :rom: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:48 AM Subject: FW: Renaming and Redifining Neighborhoods This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastnera()EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov _ _ ..... . -' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families S Doing Business From: Kristen Vietzen [mai Ito: kvietzen(ayahoo.coml Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 4:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Renaming and Redifining Neighborhoods Hello, My husband and I just wanted to say that we disagree with the renaming and redefining of the Sunnyslope neighborhood as "Greater Country Club." We can see how this makes sense geographically, but does not make sense architechturally. We agree with Ann and Erik Wordelmans email to the cit) -. Thank you for considering our thoughts. Thanks, Paul and Kristen Vietzen 4504 Bruce Avenue 1 Ariel Klugman From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:51 AM Subject: FW: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant (! ' 952 -826 -0342 Fax 952 -826 -0389 ( " };.` : ekastner @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ann & Erik Wordelman [mailto:wordelman @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 3:32 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: City Renaming and Redefining Country Club Neighborhood Dear City Council Members, My wife and I are writing to express our opinion with regard to the "Name Your Neighborhood" project, as we are unable to attend the Jan. 22nd community input meeting. We strongly oppose the report's recommendation to combine the Country Club and Sunnyslope neighborhoods into one area called "Greater Country Club." 1 First the Country Club district has a unique distinctive and valued status as a historic district. The narne "Country Club" should only be used to reference the neighborhood as it exists today and has historically. It would be dilutive to the true Country Club neighborhood to use the "Country Club" name elsewhere in the the city of Edina. It would also be highly misleading, and therefore, non- sensical to call the Sunnyslope neighborhood "Greater Country Club." Given Country Club's distinctive historic status, the name "Country Club" should not be associated with a non - historic district. As reported on the City of Edina website: "The Edina Country Club District, platted in 1924 by Thorpe Brothers Realty Company, was one of the first modern planned communities in Minnesota. A majority of the homes were constructed between 1924 and 1941 on land originally serving the Browndale Farm (Henry Brown's land) and the old Baird farm (George Baird) ... Samuel Thorpe carefully designed every aspect of the neighborhood to include heavily tree -lined streets and parks, as well as uniform building and design restrictions. Unique to the times, Thorpe ensured that all of the major utilities were installed before the lots were placed on market, thus ensuring that the neighborhood was developed according to his plan. Care was also taken to protect the property values in the form of deed restrictions, valid for 40 years, which were enforced by the Country Club Neighborhood Association led by Thorpe. The regulations were strictly adhered to and dictated, among other things, what kind of trees could be planted and where garbage cans should be placed." Additionally, as the City of Edina's website indicates, "Thorpe's historic Country Club District was added to the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places in 1980, recognizing the neighborhood as one of the first planned communities in the United States." Furthermore, from "The Crier" July 1935 as posted on the City of Edina website: "One of the four outstanding subdivisions in the country -that is the description applied to the Country Club District by men whose experience and observations over long periods of years make them qualified judges." "That the Country Club is something more than just another subdivision is illustrated by the words of its founder, S. S. Thorpe... who said he wanted it to be his valedictory, and now that it is well developed and 11 years old, he is satisfied that 'if I did it all over again, I don't know that I could do anything different.' " 2 Secondly, the recommendation appears to be quite inconsistent with the criteria being used by the Steering Committee itself. The Name Your Neighborhood report dated Dec. 2012 lists several criteria on page 171, including: size /viability; natural boundaries; roadways; access; current neighborhood associations; and history. Based on almost every one of these criteria, it does not seem logical or reasonable to combined the current Country Club and Sunnyslope neighborhoods into one larger area called "Greater Country Club." First, there is a clear natural boundary, the Minnehaha Creek, that separates these two neighborhoods and limits access. The only easy means of accessing Sunnyslope from Country Club is by walking up 50th Street, a fairly busy roadway. Next, each of these neighborhoods has its own, successful, distinctive neighborhood associations. Furthermore, the natural land features and home styles are dramatically different between these neighborhoods. Lastly, as noted above, Country Club has a rich, well - established history as its own unique neighborhood, and it's been working well as such since 1924. Based on these factors, we are unaware of any compelling rationale for changing the Country Club or Sunnyslope neighborhoods as they exist today. We would suggest that the Steering Committee would need to present a clear, compelling case for such a significant change (and gain a majority of support from existing affected residents) before anyone presumes that residents in these neighborhoods would be in favor of such a change. Without a clear case, we urge that City Council avoid changing what has already been working so well for each of these respective neighborhoods. We suspect that there's a silent majority of residents in Country Club who would agree. Sincerely, Erik and Ann Wordelman 4522 Bruce Avenue Edina MN 55424 Ariel Klugman rom: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:25 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Comments for Jan 22 Public Hearing - Please confirm receipt Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 k Ibiunno(ccDEdinaMN . gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raisins; Families & Doing Business From: troddisO)aol.com [mailto:troddis @aol.coml Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Comments for Jan 22 Public Hearing - Please confirm receipt I request that this email be read into the record of the January 22 city council hearing on Neighborhood Boundaries And Names And The Related Neighborhood Association Policy. To the mayor and city council of Edina: I am writing to provide my views on the "Name your Neighborhood" plan and related proposals on neighborhood associations. I am strongly opposed to proposals for the city to create or recognize official neighborhood associations. I view this as an expansion of city government and bureaucracy that creates an additional layer between the city council and residents, only serving to reduce access, transparency and accountability. Furthermore, I think it is completely inappropriate for the city council to be considering an expansion of "overhead" when their primary focus should be on keeping the growth of the city budget and taxes in check. As a home owner in the Country Club neighborhood, I feel that I am already very well served by our existing community organization, which we fund through voluntary contributions. In addition, the related neighborhood re- naming proposal is flawed with regard to its recommendations for the Country Club neighborhood. The Country Club neighborhood boundaries are historically well defined. As the City of Edina website describes "Thorpe's historic Country Club District was added to the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places in 1980, recognizing the neighborhood as one of the first planned communities in the United States." Not only is the commonality questionable with the additional homes that are proposed to be part of the "greater:' Country Club neighborhood; but the Country Club District is recognized throughout the Twin Cities as a highly desirable neighborhood and this expansion of the designation beyond its historic boundaries would be confusing and dilutive. I ask that the mayor and city council to take no further action on these matters. Thank you, Tom Roddis 4920 Arden Ave Ariel Klugman From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:27 PM Subject: FW: changing the Country Club neighborhood boundaries and definition This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastnercDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov F or Living, Learning, Raising Families 4 Doing Business From: P Seng [mailto•pseng2012(5gmail.coMI Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: changing the Country Club neighborhood boundaries and definition To whom it may concern, I disagree with changing the boundaries and name of the Country Club neighborhood. This neighborhood was built and named over 80 years ago, and is a "historic neighborhood ". Even on the City of Edina website, it's recognized as being on the National Register of Historic Places. I think redefining it at this point causes the neighborhood to lose some of it's identity. It seems like a redefinition based on convenience - as in Sunnyslope doesn't fit anywhere, it's too small to be considered it's own neighborhood (although it isn't, IMO), let's just combine it with Country Club" I've been a resident for 19 years and like to see the continuation of our existing neighborhood definition. Thanks for your consideration. Peter Seng 4522 Drexel Ave owe 0. • ,NroRPOR!'�� • 1BB0 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M VI. B. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing — Vacation Request, Roadway Easement Adjacent to 5250 Benton Avenue, Resolution No. 2013 -12. Action Requested: If the Council so desires, approve attached Resolution No. 2013 -12 that reassigns ownership of the City owned parcel to the adjoining neighbor located at 5250 Benton Avenue, with the exception of the westerly I 0 -feet to be reassigned subject to a utility easement. Information / Background: This request is from the owner of 5250 Benton Avenue. The owner had quit claimed the property in 1957 to the Village of Edina to be used for street purposes. Due to the fact that the quit claim deed specified that the property was to be used for street purposes, staff followed the right -of -way vacation process. Private and public utilities have been contacted to be sure that there are no conflicts with reassigning the ownership. Centerpoint and Xcel Energy do have utilities located along the westerly property line. Century Link, Comcast, and City of Edina do not have utilities within this area. Therefore, staff recommends that we retain the westerly 10 -feet to be used for utility purposes. No streets have been constructed within the proposed vacation area and the Edina Comprehensive Plan does not indicate future roadways, sidewalk or trails within the proposed vacation area. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -12 Public Right Of Way Vacation Application with sketch Quit Claim Deed Notice of Public Hearing G: \PW\noMiN \COMM\EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \B Streets \5205 Benton Ave - Vacation of Easement \Item VI.B. PH'g Vacation Request Roadway Easement Adjacent to 5205 Benton Avenue, Resolution No. 2013- 12.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -12 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP REASSIGNMENT WHEREAS, a petition was received on December 14, 2012, from the property owner of 5205 Benton Avenue requesting the vacation of existing public right -of -way located adjacent to their property; and WHEREAS, this property was Quit Claim Deeded to the City by the same property owner on October 24, 1957; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on January 22, 2013, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the right -of -way is not needed for public purposes, with the exception of the westerly ten feet;.. and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described right -of -ways are hereby vacated: The west thirty (30) feet of Lot Seven (7), Block One (1), Codes Highview Park, according to recoded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota. 2. That the property owner shall execute a Public Utility Easement that dedicates the following described area: The west ten (10) feet of Lot Seven (7), Block One (1), Codes Highview Park, according to recoded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the transfer of this property. Dated: January 22, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk EDINA PUB LICWORKS & PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov •.952- 826 -0376 - Fax 952 - 826 -0392 J Li �.7L%ZA, o e City Of Edina, Minnesota DEC 14 2012 Cn DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 4801 West 5& Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1 Phone n (952) 927 -8861 TDD ❑ (952) 626 -0379 Fax n (952) 826 -03,90 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WARY �VACATION APPLICATION Applicant - CO— 01,1 P, _ Print Name �1 Address `7 o2O�~ 061 X u'C ��l i'1 C�.1 M N 515 I -3� Street moostate Zip Telephone No. Fax No. t hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 442.851 and Edina Code Section 820: [] Street Q Alley [] Utility Easement © Drainage Easement Other 15,57 A-1-are- trcr.�d ukx�/ Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shalt be transmitted electronically in a Word documents to the City of Edina City Clerk: Dmangen @edinamn.gov): - 7"hJ� 1�C s-f- "h ('�/,��; i3o) Fee --t- n� Lo-4— S� Ut✓t„ i7�i 8 ('GGt�- Oh c j i Cods Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water? D Yes f No Please note If the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made unless written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City of Edina thirty days before any Council action. • Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing In full detail the area proposed to be .vacated. • Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we Inform you of your rights about,the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data Is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose Information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina Is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply Information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Department of Public Safety, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant OHlce, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for vedt!cation of Information submitted In the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address Telephone Number Date Initiated �� - ?2 �' ` i° a� Signature 03/07/2012 Account No. 901 .4391 BENTON AVE. Proposed Vacation of Quit Claim Deed for street purposes The West Thirty (30) feet of Lot Seven (7), Block One (1), Codes Highview Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota. 'K rZ 5901 5908 SBAI 6608 5812 SB16 5700 5900 3918 5300 Vacation Request Adjaa 3805 71 3801 .5801 S80B 5812 - 58r7 5816 .5817 A A 6208 3101 3700 5716 3212 E:MQYAtiE 5215 5113 3209 21 5705 5101 5905 5904 3909 5908 5913 5912 5917 3016 5921 $711 5208 5204 5100 caeenauetau a 60THST19 a1'p�ICI�OGS Ci: Fin Nr-IF PID:3311721320012 5205 Benton Ave Edina, MN 55436 t To 5205 Benton Logend ® Seloctod Features Surrounding Hama Number Labels ST70 - 51I6 5717 3108 , House Number Labels StrooFName Labels N City Limits 68TH 91W , ^j Cracks OLake Names 3109 r -- t Lakes 0 Parks OParcols 5108 3171 5117 I sM I 5109 3110 3110 3111 5108 evTH57W ri 0 HInteractive Maps l r e AVE Parcel Abstract Market 33- 117 -21 -32 -0011 ID: Owner $0.00 Total: Vil Of Edina Name: Parcel 24 Address Unassigned Address: Edina, MN 00000 Property Residential Type: Home- stead: Non Homestead Parcel 0.06 acres Area: 2,539 sq ft A -T -B: Abstract Market $0 Total: Tax $0.00 Total: (Payable: 2012) Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: Property Map Map Scale: 1 "::= 50 ft. Print Date: 12/16/2012 FV 1V This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2012 (See Note) ' sranl.a as ................. fres act and deed......,...................................................: ............................... Sea Note).1. '•! _!:.'yh i HENNEPIN Notary Public ........................................ ................................... CoibnEy:, .11y conbmission expires...... JANUARY i.? ... Note: The blanklInes marked ' to Note "'are for uee when the Instrument Is executed by an attorney In fact. Filed for reoord on the 12 day of Nov A.D.:1967 at 3s30 ofolook P.M. 1 Ink J S t CD IZI b,. 4 444 IIN d t ... ids O 'a 1 erg 'a1 ,ty� E, Ott 'S ff C14 ) ,t�a t1 �1 1�yy_ •' ��{ er F11 1 _ / ( 1 Z-5 a. Jr i3 . rX Ink J S t CD IZI b,. 4 444 IIN d t ... ids O 'a 1 erg 'a1 ,ty� E, Ott 'S ff C14 ) ,t�a t1 �1 r Form No. 28 -M. 149 PA096 3092"'04 ZV O; .da o ........ kmff ........... . ....................... Ye p... of tho County of....... IIQAUQD. IA ............................. .......and State of........... iannsaata ................... ............ .... .......... ..... parE..�. a. of the pee part,. and .... .............. ......... VA - 11m gm..9.f... Min as................ ..._._..._................................. .........,..................... a corporation under the laws of the State o�P.:... lfii xtnaaa ta ........... ............................... party of the second .part, Efhteaft1b, That the said part... 1ae of the first part, in consideration of the sum of to ............... t harlL .............. .. ................ In hand paid by the said party of the second wart, the reosipt whereof is hereby aOknowledged, do............ hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitolalm, and Convey unto the said party of the second part, it8 suocessor8 and ae8ign8, Forever, all the trabt ...... or parcel...... of land lying and being in the County of ......... 99m.0911 ....................... ............................and State of Ninnesota, desoriibed as follows, to -wit: YO-012149 FACE297 The 1Vest Thirty (30) -Feet of Lot Seven (7), Block one (1), Oode's Highview Park, according to the reap or plat thereof on rile and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. This deed is given for street purposes only. Zi ,babe anb tO 3001b1he Caine, Together with all the horeditarnents and appurtenances there- unto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part, its successor a and assigns, POrevgr. Sn Wet;timonp Ohereot, The said, pardQe... of the first part ha.Y.0 .. hereunto set... theit .................. hn."A 0 fhm i7nav fund.. i,aar Araf ahmun v,rI.ffon. l iGtl81Jl I•ojX 1 OB9X JOHN E. CARDARELLE AND ASSCKIATES ENG'RS, it SURVEYORS `WE 9.759,0.' MIS 1NEAPOGIS 1 :i �l:..+.•r. %ua�.- 4Yi� via' .. CERTIFICATE :' OF ...SURVEY'.' URVEY' -• .,, !�• •� ti is — � •• .. -' • ��� .. 1: 1• �: I a: M Pro pored .` ' This is a tree and'correct representation of a survey of the - boundaries „ of•the land herein described. It does•not purport to 'show imornvemeniie ''or encroachments, if any. It e180'shows the location'of a prouosed J N Ilding but no stake's have been set for such location. Described as follows: The Westerly 154 feet.of Lot 7 Mooks1, Codes 8lghview park; Village of Edina, Minnesota, subject to an•easement: for ja future 'roadway' over the Westerly 30 feet theireof; Dated this l7.th day of September, 1957• ,, .. _ .. . • ,,. .. Scaly; 30 . ..' " JOH . CARDAREL�//U 97167T RIM,. 104 5" J X01 CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST SOT" STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY:MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on January.22, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for a scenic and open space easement to be vacated: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED: The West Thirty (30) feet of Lot Seven (7), Block One (1), Codes Highview Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television :poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or Water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk Dated December 18, 2012 PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE Edina SUN CURRENT, THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 2013 SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: January 22, 2013 Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -14 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: 411 &'-'A, 1 o ne n7fo Agenda Item #: VIII. A. Action N Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipients departments for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -14 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-14 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Lynne Dolan Three Laser Jet Printers & Papers Bob Stevermer Three Handmade Wood Pottery Bats Braemar Memorial Fund For Future Golf Course Equipment Purchases Timothy Jordheim $25.00 David Knoke $25.00 Leslie Sharpe $25.00 Edina Fire Department: Dow Chemical $3,000.00 Edina Police Department: Edina Crime Fund $13,824.71 Dated: January 22, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS . CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Annual K -9 Expenses James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: City Council From: Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director Date: January 22, 2013 Subject: Edina Swim Club Residency Requirement A in • `��RPORA��O • i88B Agenda Item #. VIII.B. Action Requested: Change the Edina Swim Club's current 75% residency requirement to 60 %. Information / Background: At the December 20, 2011 City Council Meeting: Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, reaffirming the Edina Swim Club as the youth sports organization having primary access to City-owned swimming facilities and directing staff to draft an edited relational document and priority Aquatic Center Facilities Policy with a 75% residency requirement. The Council discussed the motion and asked questions of Mr. Keprios who explained the first priority was given to City programs, the second priority was designated to sports organizations and remaining pool time was offered to other users. Historically, the Edina Swim Club had not used evening hours, so that time had been offered to the Aquajets Swim Club. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. At the May I, 2012 City Council Meeting: Mr. Keprios presented staffs recommendation to adopt the proposed Priority Use of the Edina Aquatic Center Facility Policy and Relationship Document that reflected a 75% residency requirement for the Edina Swim Club and granting it first priority access. In addition, the Edina Swim Club must maintain its status as a nonprofit corporation in accordance with Minnesota law, and may not discriminate based on ability; however, may make team assignments based on demonstrated ability to swim 25 yards in both the freestyle and backstroke. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving priority use of the Edina Aquatic Center Facilities Policy and Relationship Document, with corrections to grammar and capitalization. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. As they prepared their request for Edina Aquatic Center hours for the 2013 season, the Edina Swim Club administrators realized that they were not meeting the 75% residency requirement which grants them priority access. In December 2012, the Edina Swim Club discussed concerns regarding the residency requirement with staff. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 N REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Current Edina Swim Club participants: • are 71% Edina residents • under age 12 are 85% Edina residents • over age 12 are 52% Edina residents • over age 14 are 41 % Edina residents Highly competitive swimmers are an elite group. Non - competitive swimmers typically opt out of Club swimming around age 13 due to time and energy commitments of competition. Those who stay in competitive Club swim 5 -6 times per week, frequently race, often qualify for sectional and national meets, and often are recruited for college swimming. Due to the relatively small total number of teenage competitive swimmers, all clubs in the metro draw from outside their communities. Board members from the Edina Swim Club will be present to make a brief presentation and answer questions. Attachment A: December 17th, 2012 - Letter from the Edina Swim Club to Ann Kattreh December 17, 2012 Dear Ann, This letter is to provide you, the Park and Recreation Department, and the City of Edina with an update from Edina Swim Club and to propose a revised residency requirement level of 60% for the Edina Swim Club to be named the independently incorporated youth athletic association for.the sport of competitive swimming in Edina per the Priority Use of The Edina AquaticCenter Facility Policy implemented April 4, 2012. As you recall, a new policy for the priority use of the Edina Aquatic Center facility was developed and approved by the City on April 4 of this year. This new policy was the result of -many discussions between the Edina Swim Club and various City staff as well as input from other swim clubs and City Council members. A key issue in the discussions.was the "residency requirement" language for the new policy. The final document includes a 75% residency quota as one of the tenets to ensure the Edina Swim Club will have prioritized scheduled access use of the Edina Aquatic Center facility's available rental times and sections: At the time of the discussions, our historical data for residency showed levels around the 75% mark. Subsequent to the new policy approval in April, we put a new process in place for annual enrollment to ensure 100% accuracy tracking residency status (or the equivalent.of residency i.e. attending school in Edina) for the 2012 — 13,season and all future enrollments. As we prepared to submit our request for the Edina Aquatic Center hours for the summer of 2013 we pulled our residency data details. and realized that we currently do not meet the 759/6 requirement... Importantly, to meet the 75% requirement would mean turning away not only fledgling swimmers but also top - level, competitive swimmers.who reside in other communities. Turning away these swimmers has the perhaps unintended consequence of significant negative impacts on the Edina Swim Club, including:. 1. Lost revenues (at $800 $1500 per year, per swimmer) 2. Adversely affecting the ability of the Edina Swim Club to maintain national status as a top- tier swim club. 3. Competitive swimmers we turn away then join the very club(s)we are vying with for Aquatic Center time. 1 LO Initiatives to Increase Resident Participation We are implementing programs to continue to boost the number of Edina residents who are in the Club. However, even with these initiatives we do not project we will be able to attain and sustain the 75% mark. Two key initiatives underway to boost resident participation in the Club: 1. A new "fitness and prep" program for high school swimmers. a. There are many swimmers on the Edina high school swim team who do not participate in Club swimming. These are teenagers who participate in other sports and activities and do not have the time or financial resources for full -on, competitive Club swimming. Our new program will include several short sessions per year, at reduced pricing and time commitments, to encourage teens to prepare for the high school swim season or cross -train for other sports. 2. A "feeder" program in conjunction with Community Education swim lessons. a. We are working with the Community Education staff to include Edina Swim Club advertising in the Community Ed brochures, develop a new "Competitive Swimming Readiness" class, informational fliers, and "education nights" for young swimmers who have finished the highest level of Community Ed swimming classes and are candidates to join Edina Swim Club. Club Costs Are Not Comparable to Park and Rec Sport Costs While Club swimming has some similarities with other Park and Recreation sports, there are important cost differences that are critical factors when making decisions about the Club and its status within the City. Loss of revenue from turning away non - resident swimmers can have significant negative impact on Edina Swim Club's sustainability and growth. 1. Facility Costs a. Unlike baseball where fields are plentiful and free to use, Edina Swim Club must compete for limited pool space with other groups in the community such as school gym classes, high school swim teams, synchronized swim clubs, and community education. Edina Swim Club spends approximately $126,000 per year renting pool space at Edina pools. Our annual expenditures for Edina pools increased this year as we shifted significant pool rental hours away from Blake and into the Edinborough pool. Edina Swim Club is currently in agreement with the City of Edina to pay an annual guarantee of $53,000 for pool use at Edinborough Park. This agreement ensures a revenue stream to the City that helps allow the park and pool to continue to operate. 2. Professional Coaches and Management Costs a. The largest expense for the Edina Swim Club is paid coaches. Unlike Park and Rec sports where coaches are volunteers or receive nominal per diems, the Edina Swim.Club has three salaried, professional coaches,and 8 —12 part-time paid coaches throughout the various seasons. b. The Club leases office space and pays an Office Manager for 30 - 40 hours per week. c. Additional employee costs include travel and per diem for coaches for "away" events such as regional and national meets, which can include air travel and hotel. 3. Oversight and Costs from Multiple Organizations a. Edina Swim Club: must meet.the requirements and follow policy guidelines not only for the City of Edina Park and Recreation Department, but also for Minnesota Swimming and the national organization, USA Swimming. These organizations require insurance, background checks on coaches, coach certifications, and administrative policies. This means costs for the Club that need to be covered by revenue. A key point to note about the Edina Swim Club: we are and will continue to.strive to be a strong partner with Edina Park and Rec to provide a top -level swimming program for Edina youth. The Edina Swim Club is based in Edina and will continue to be an integral part of the Edina athletic community. The vast majority of our younger swimmers are Edina residents or attend Edina schools. We are also a nationally recognized swim club. This national recognition comes from our conscientious and diligent pursuit and retention of top coaches and top swimmers. This national status brings a positive.light to the City of Edina: when newcomers move to Minnesota and look for the best schools and best communities to live in, Edina is one of the top communities on.the list. As a nationally recognized club, the Edina Swim Club can add to the overall draw of the city. A 75% residency target may have worked for the Edina Swim Club 10 or 15 years ago when the residency target of 75% was initially proposed— the Club was smaller.and not as robustly developed as it is today. However, 75% is an untenable target going forward. We respectfully request an amendment to the Aquatic Facility Policy fora residency rate of 60%. Sincerely, Cyd Perszyk President, Edina Swim Club 3 o.. V Ow (E) l q "y 1880 To: City Council Agenda Item #: VIII.C. From: Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Bids for Countryside Park Renovation Action .Requested: Authorize staff to seek bids for the Countryside Park Renovation. Information / Background: The development of the Countryside Park master plan began back in 2008 and included a needs survey of the residents within 1,000 feet of the park followed by a neighborhood input meeting in the Council Chambers. Attached is a copy of the Site Analysis as the park existed in September of 2007. The attached October 2008 Park Renovation Plan is a.concept drawing that reflects the park amenities that were favored by the residents. The attached June 2012 Park: Master Plan shows those same park amenities in a slightly different configuration within the park. That plan was the result of our consultant's recommendations to minimize the amount of grading, reduce the number of trees to be removed, reduce construction expenses, allow for a typical outdoor pleasure skating rink and create a better placement of the building and playground equipment-in relation to the west parking lot and hillside. The most current and proposed "Final Master Plan" attached, is a result of further analysis by staff and the consultant. Our professional Park Maintenance staff provided valuable input into the location of the park amenities as well as the.design of the park shelter building. As you will notice, the Final Master Plan shows the relocation of the basketball court further to the east to allow for more gradual . turns in the pathway within the park that will be easier to maintain and also allows for a slightly longer hockey rink that would be similar to most of our other outdoor hockey rinks. The professional architect firm that has been involved in the park design from the start is HKGI. Also attached is a copy of the proposed park shelter building design. The design is a result of input from the Countryside Park neighborhood association representatives, Parks and Recreation Department administrative and park maintenance staff, Public Works staff and the consultant. The consulting firm is SGN/Wendell Architects which is the firm that designed our newest park shelter. buildings at Weber Park, Walnut Ridge Park, Todd Park and. Cornelia School Park. The goal was to design a park shelter building that will meet the. program and park user needs of the residents of the neighborhood and all park users of today and well into the future. The building is designed to be more than just a place to change shoes for ice skates. The building will also be an aesthetically pleasing gathering place for residents to conduct meetings, social gatherings both indoor and outdoor. The shelter building will be on the City of Edina keyless entry system, so the bathroom facilities will be made available to the public year around. The building also includes a sheltered area for picnicking and is conveniently located near the west parking lot. City. of Edina • 4801 W. 50f St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT 1 RECOMMENDATION Funding for the project includes: • $695,000- Park Dedication fee from the Waters development 0 $330,000 - 2012 Capital Improvement Plan - including Playground and hard surface paths_ • $1,025,000 Total ATTACHMENTS: e Countryside Park 2007 Site Analysis • Countryside Park Cost Estimate • Countryside Park Site Plan 1 -22 -13 • Edina. Countryside Park shelter A r Page 2 Single Family - - -- Residental - Olinger Boulevard ...........; a Existing M --- - -- - Cottonwoods .• I f _ 4 �• l; �' i ` Hillsid e Road Boggy Area r ; 'L ! . Colonial • ,t Church •• . <. 4/A.R GO u 2t�JyLG�P ir%�Lf2 f z T s Isting S h elf li Previou` Building r.c di Fire Hall Site Analysis September 2007 • Lack of handicap accessibility • Lack of walking paths • Reliance on on- street parking • High quality little league field • Far distance between shared parking and recreational uses • Shelter building in poor condition LEGEND Site Boundary " "... Sidewalk Steep Slopes (Burins) 04 High Traffic Area Countryside Park Improvements - Edina, MN date: Jan 14, 2013 Cost Estimate SITE WORK ITEMS item description I QTYI unit unit cost total Subtotal PREP Mobilization (less than 10 %) 1 LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 ITRAFFIC CONTROL 1.00 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 SILT FENCE 1850 LIN FT $ 2.00 $ 3,700.00 BIOROLL 700 LIN FT $ 1.50 $ 1,050.00 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EACH $ 750.00 $ 750.00 INLET PROTECTION 2 EACH $ 250.00 $ 500.00 civil civil civil civil civil $ 57,500.00 REMOVALS Demo existing bld 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 JABANDON EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 1.00 LUMP SUM $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 120 SO YD $ 5.00 $ 600.00 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER 40 LIN FT $ 3.00 $ 120.00 SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 80 LIN FT $ 3.50 $ 280.00 BITUMINOUS STREET PATCHING 120 SQ YD $ 75.00 $ 9,000.00 Tree removals BY CITY civil civil civil civil civil Demo bituminous trail and conc walk BY CITY Demo old play equipment BY CITY Demo old play container BY CITY Demo basketball court / salvage hoops BY CITY EARTHWORKS Common earthworks 1 LS $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 16,500.00 Amendments for field turf - 2" (CV) 406 CY $ 10.00 $ 4,060.00 Stockpile field soils and respread 1220 CY $ 5.00 $ 6,100.00 Infield skin = 4" (CV) import new /export old and install 168 CY $ 40.00 $ 6,720.00 Drain tile field 1 LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Pitchers mound 1 LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Home base area 1 LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Bull pens (not incl fencing or conc. Strip) 2 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 Retaining wall - 2ft seat 226 LFF $ 45.00 $ 10,170.00 Retaining wall - 2ft seat 160 LFF $ 45.00 $ 7,200.00 CIVIL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 40 LIN FT $ 20.00 $ 800.00 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 170 SO FT $ 5.00 $ 850.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 1 EACH $ 250.00 $ 250.00 4" DI WATERMAIN PIPE 252 LIN FT $ 35.00 $ 8,820.00 6" DI WATERMAIN PIPE 15 LIN FT $ 40.00 $ 600.00 4" GV & BOX 1 EACH $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 6" GV & BOX 1 EACH $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 HYDRANT 1 EACH $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 IDUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 177 POUND $ 6.00 $ 1,062.00 6" SDR -26 PVC SANI TARY SEWER SERVICE PI 613 LIN FT $ 30.00 $ 18,390.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE 1 EACH $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 SANITARY MANHOLE CASTING 3 EACH $ 600.00 $ 1,800.00 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 39.8 LIN FT $ 250.00 $ 9,950.00 $ 79,750.00 civil IB618 civil civil civil civil civil civil civil civil civil civil civil civil PAVEMENTS Ped ramp (includes curb removal, concwalk 1 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 49,322.00 new curb, bit patch, truncated domes ) 4" concrete maintenance s trip - 18" wide - fencing 1182 LF $ 12.00 $ 14,184.00 Dug out concrete slab - reinforced 895 SF $ 12.00 $ 10,740.00 4" Concrete edger 24" w ide- for basketball court 632 SF $ 8.00 $ 5,056.00 Concrete walk at playground /bld 2010 SF $ 6.00 $ 12,060.00 8ft bit woodland trail and base 320 LF $ 25.00 $ 8,000.00 8ft bit trail and base 2050 LF $ 20.00 $ 41,000.00 BB court bituminous pavement and base 5040 SF $ 4.50 $ 22,680.00 BB Court surface and striping 5040 SF $ 0.50 $ 2,520.00 SITE AMENITIES 8' chain link fence 1 . 0481 LF $ 35.00 $ 36,680.00 $ 117,740.00 8' chain link fence - 6' gate 21 EACH 1 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 8' chain link fence - 10' gate 1 I EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 25' chain link fence backstop 1001 LF 1 $ 190.00 1 $ 19,000.00 Picnic tables 3 EACH $ 1,200.00 $ 3,600.00 foul pole & footing 2 EACH $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 Install BB hoops provided by owner 2 EACH $ 800.00 $ 1,600.00 15' backless Players bench 4 EACH $ 900.00 $ 3,600.00 CMU dugout with metal roof 1 EACH $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 CM dugout with metal roof with storage room 1 EACH $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 ' IRRIGATION Irrigation for field 65839 SF $ 0.10 $ 6,583.90 $ 104,280.00 ELECTRICAL Hockey lighting - footing 21 EA I $ 1,200.00 is 6,583.90 1 $ 2,400.00 Landscaping and foul area turf - seeding and 65839 establishment SF 1 $ 0.10 $ 6,583.90 $ 2,400.00 —7Outfield deciduous tree, 2.5 inch cal B &B 11 EA $ 350.00 $ 3,850.00 general turf seed restoration 6840 SY $ 0.75 $ 5,130.00 sod 600 SY $ 5.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 18, 563.90 Subtotal $ 452,639.80 Construction Contingency - 10% 1 $ 45,263.98 Construction Total $ 497,903.78 ALL PARK IMPROVEMENT TOTALS New play equipment, PIP surf ace and installation $ 173,337.97 New Park Shelter $ 350,000.00 Site work $ 497,903.78 PROJECT ESTIMATE TOTAL TO DATE $ 1,021,241.75 ..._,.._._.....__�fiENfJfncA.., .. __.°' _... _._. __ ............. .. u OLINGER BLVR, SX SURVEY RX WORK LIMITS . CX • -moo - -- � `0 .. UTILITIES EXISTING UTILITY DETAILS PARK LANDSCAPELAYOUT PARKING LANDSCAPE GRADING LOT LANDSCAPE DETAILS ..._,.._._.....__�fiENfJfncA.., .. __.°' _... _._. __ ............. .. u OLINGER BLVR, SX SURVEY RX REMOVAL PLAN CX • -moo - -- � `0 .. UTILITIES CX UTILITY DETAILS LX LANDSCAPELAYOUT GX LANDSCAPE GRADING LX LANDSCAPE DETAILS IRX 1: 1 I G EXISTING A LL FIELD a �4 BALLFIELD J. LD LIMITSy.. YGRbTJAD� /— ..._,.._._.....__�fiENfJfncA.., .. __.°' _... _._. __ ............. .. COUNTRYSIDE PARK IMPROVEMENTS SHEETINDEX TX TITLE SHEET SX SURVEY RX REMOVAL PLAN CX EROSION CONTROL CX UTILITIES CX UTILITY DETAILS LX LANDSCAPELAYOUT GX LANDSCAPE GRADING LX LANDSCAPE DETAILS IRX IRRIGATION PLAN G D _ aEXISTING l COUNTRYSIDE PARK IMPROVEMENTS SHEETINDEX TX TITLE SHEET SX SURVEY RX REMOVAL PLAN CX EROSION CONTROL CX UTILITIES CX UTILITY DETAILS LX LANDSCAPELAYOUT GX LANDSCAPE GRADING LX LANDSCAPE DETAILS IRX IRRIGATION PLAN VICINITY MAP ) S/TE NO SCALE LOCATION MAP oD 2940- ow 1= N 0 R T H SME: 1- 40'-0' 1Pe R c aD E m 0 Q s a Ng m ;. CB vZm� N o Q m CO @i c>�.w pa®® Us_ 9�3 wg�Lu 13- fn x p $ uJ ©© T1 �^ r a e F City at Edhu Caunhyshia Park Sheller 608 DESIGN REVIEW FLOOR AND REFLECTED CEILINGPLANS e ,qn4 Hill MH �Z. I H I Q � - caFniaoox _ MINS _ Q •Q _ 0 - 0 3 OFPiSfOP } 8 FLOOR PLAN REFLECTED CEILING PLAN �^ r a e F City at Edhu Caunhyshia Park Sheller 608 DESIGN REVIEW FLOOR AND REFLECTED CEILINGPLANS e ,qn4 BOOM f���ra����i��■ omm i2ME ��� f---- - - - --- � BMW ���Ne����i��a CAy of Min Ceu pm% NA Sheffer 60% DESIGN REVIEW ELEVATIONS A401 I I Ei l 1 =11- III -I I- III =11 EP-1 =11 I I I- TLIMC -J I �I I �I I -1I1 =- III -1I C -I I EI I I 1 II�J1�1��1= LPL= 1�1I�II�I 1 =1I IL ���1LJI�LLI�-= ll1-= 1��IIEI��II —I 11 —I I LI I I —I I LI I LI I I —I I C I I —I I III — I 1 I CI 11 =1 I I I I —I I I I CI I I I— I LI I— III —I I C7I IJ I C NORTH ELEVATION - SOUTH ELEVATION . . . - _ CNy of EdIN Counbyddn Park Shgkr 60% DESIGN REVIEW ELEVATIONS A402 1 EXTERIOR VIEW - MIN 0 EXTERIOR NEW -SE INTERIOR VIEW 3 2 INTERIOR VIEW I 4 MTERIOR VIEW 2 .yofEcom Cmmtryskb Pak Sheller 60% DESIGN REVIEW sp.m0wenclel Pol ��la�6'� Edina Art Center Board Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Art Center Studio 14 November 1S,2012 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Vice -Chair McCabe called the meeting to order at 4:38 p.m. II. Roll Call Members Present: Bill,McCabe, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Colin Nelson, Kitty O'Dea, Thomas Raeuchle, and John Swon, Student Representative Melissa Stefanik. Members Absent: Hafed Bouassida. Staff Present: Michael Frey, Edina Art Center General Manager; Sandra Shaughnessy, Pottery Studios Manager. Community Members Present: None. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Vice -Chair McCabe noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. No changes voiced. The agenda was approved as presented. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of October 25, 2012 Vice -Chair McCabe asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 25, 2012. No changes voiced. The minutes were approved as submitted. V. Community Comment There were no comments made. VI. Reports /Recommendations A. Edina Film Festival Member Swon presented a summary of the successful Edina Film Festival, reporting revenue generation and attendance were similar to last year and a check of close to $3,000 can be given to the Edina Art Center (EAC): He indicated issues to resolve, going forward; revolve around the costs to use the Landmark ($6,000) and loss of several major sponsors. Member Sworn pointed out the Landmark was an ideal location in the heart of Edina; however, 50th and France provides little suppot for the event. Member Sworn stated the committee considered other locations such as Edina High School that would have a lower cost or the AMC (Southdale), but they (AMC) will not allow ticket sales at the box office. In addition, it would be beneficial to have several months of promotion, completion of the program guides and posters at an earlier date, and assistance from a public relations person to promote the Festival. Another option would be to consider a different date. The Board discussed the need for a clear objective for the Film. Festival. Member O'Dea asked whether a different timing for the event should be considered, such as during the summer, or to se two venues. Member Swon explained the timing was selected through a process of eliminating dates with other ompeting activities and major festivals. It was felt late fall would be best when there were fewer competing activities and the weather is not yet inclement. .I . Ike Member Meifert agreed with the need for additional promotion and asked whether the Edina Performing Arts Center had been considered as a venue. Member Raeuchle stated it is good to review this year's event. He suggested the goals are three fold: raising money for the EAC; creating a community event; and, having some artistic contribution to the world. He noted it may not be a good return on investment to spend $7,000 in order to raise $3,000 for the EAC so, perhaps, that goal should be listed farther down the line and the festival become a free community event that attracts more people. Member Raeuchle stated he thought the artistic aspiration was local although it did not come through so some work is needed to provide a theme for the Festival. Member Raeuchle stated he had attended the documentary about the coalwood town and noticed 50% of those attending were friends of the moviemaker so that offering may not have achieved the goal of creating a community event. Member Meifert noted one goal is image for the city. Crowd funding was also mentioned as a new format to raise money. Member Swon agreed with the need for better promotion and definition /branding for the Festival. He stated there would be benefit in hiring a PR person to promote individual films and increase media coverage. Member Swon thanked Members for their input and stated the committee is open to all suggestions and ideas. B. Edina Art Center Juried Show Vice -Chair McCabe provided a summary of the 2012 Juried Show, noting it earned a total of $6,245 with expenses of about $1,200 for printing, prize money, and jurors. He indicated the exhibits were on par with prior years and he felt it was a very good show with a good turnout for the opening, estimating 125 -130 people attending. Member Raeuchle stated there were almost too many people because it was difficult to see. He suggested considering a different venue for the opening so the art can be hung in more appropriate way. The Board congratulated the Juried Show Co- Chairs Lappin and McCabe on the success of the Juried Show. C. Membership Member Lappin reviewed the membership numbers for the month, advising there were 13 new members, 63 expiring memberships, and 18 renewals with one week to go. She indicated she will provide updated numbers at the January 2013 meeting. Member Lappin reported the Gifts! Gifts! Gifts! Sale is going on this month until December 24`h. She will be meeting with Student Members Stefanik and Ellingboe to talk about the Teen Show that is scheduled for February 2013. Member Swon asked whether she had noticed any trends with membership drop off or growth. Member Lappin indicated that memberships increased during the Juried Show and summer camps but lately things have been steady. Member Lappin stated she will be working with Mr. Frey to revise the letter that reaches out to people over two years. In addition, they will be discussing ideas such as membership drives, revamping membership offerings, and possible membership discounts. Member La Valleur stated she met with the "Goldie Gopher" sculptor who mentioned the University is selling rubber wristbands for a $2 donation towards the sculpture. She stated that may be an idea to consider, selling a rubber wristband with an art design, as a fundraiser. Member Lappin stated they had offered membership discounts for one month and talked with the City about including information with water bills. Mr. Frey indicated that membership and weekend pottery class registrations will be part of the StarTrib Steals Program in December specifically for Edina residents. Member O'Dea suggested offering membership discounts to new memberships only. Member Raeuchle suggested a 2013 Board goal to discuss and revamp membership offerings or have categories, so it is more attractive to be a member. Member Stefanik stated getting a free t -shirt is also a good incentive. Vice -Chair McCabe noted the Board did discuss membership categories when it considered the level of fees. D. Mission Statement Mr. Frey reported the mission statement will be discussed at a special meeting next Monday at 6 p.m. at the Edina Art Center. Interested Board Members are invited. E. Public Art Committee lember La Valleur reported only two actions had been taken at the November 2012 meeting: one of the new members as agreed to update the EPAC three -ring binder book at City hall; and, the Edina Sculptures book will be updated with this year's sculptures. Member La Valleur also reported on her meeting with Police Chief1ong and possibility of funding from the Crime Prevention. Fund to light and prevent vandalism to sculptures. Member Raeuchle asked if she talked with Brian Young about sculptures or wall murals. Member La Valleur reported that City Manager Neal is interested in wraps of utility boxes, has spoken with utility companies, and thinks funding may be available. Another opportunity is public poetry on the streets, as. being done in St. Paul, which may be.interesting in the Centennial Lakes area. F. Arts & Culture Working Group Member Raeuchle advised there is nothing to report but the group and intern Brendon Johnson continue to work through data and are scheduled for an audience with the City Council in February to present findings. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Vice -Chair McCabe asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Member Comments Member O'Dea suggested the Board's 2013 goals be included on the meeting agenda to provide a reminder. The Board discussed the number of terms that expire at the end of the year. Mr. Frey advised that the Bylaws call for ten members plus two student member. Currently there is one vacancy and two student members. Member O'Dea noted the need for PR has been mentioned several times tonight and suggested Members reach out to anyone they know with PR experience to make application for appointment to the Board. Mr. Frey agreed that PR is the biggest need. Vice -Chair McCabe indicated the application for appointment is posted on the City's website. lember Raeuchle reported on a town hall meeting he attended in St. Louis Park related to its art and culture activities. .ie indicated he.is on their mailing list and found their public relations pieces were very appealing. Member Raeuchle noted the City could be using multimedia, color, pictures, something more than just a press release. He stated he will be meeting with a member of the Friends of the Arts group to discuss ideas. Member La Valleur acknowledged Mr. Frey's promotion to a full -time position; however, she preferred the title of "Director" to that of "General Manager" when representing the art center. The Board concurred. Member Nelson reported on the recent successful 'The Author's Studio' event during which 48 people had attended. He then described upcoming events. Member O'Dea suggested videotaping these events. Member Nelson stated two sessions had been taped and can be broadcast on the cable channel Edina 16. He noted many watch cable channels and he hopes the sessions are picked up by other cable channels. Mr. Frey stated they have talked about partnering with The Loft for writing classes and will be investigating that opportunity. Member Meifert suggested they also consider having a short story contest with readings and expanding with different themes. Member Nelson stated he talked with The Loft and they suggested having a 12 -week course instead of a workshop because it draws better and class offerings can be expanded as it grows. Member O'Dea suggested reaching out to Martha Cosgrove who runs the high school book club so it can be extended to High School age authors. IX. Staff Comments A. Director's Report Mr. Frey reported that he has been hired as the full -time "General Manager" and while that is the official job title, he is able to use "Director" as a working title. Mr. Frey stated he is still waiting for approval on the Sutton analysis and when it will be placed on the City Council's Benda. Mr. Frey stated he is still working on job descriptions for the EAC to streamline operations and will have the plan completed for first quarter and things in place March 31. In addition, the front desk has been compiling statistical data on all membership, non - membership, zip codes, and classes taken. Mr. Frey noted Edina will be celebrating its 125 anniversary next year with events scheduled throughout the year. He stated they have been talking about having home movies pertaining to historic event within Edina that can be displayed in conjunction with the Edina Historical Society. Mr. Frey reported on the expansion of the pottery studio that is underway, the media studio schedule now open Thursday - Saturday, gift show, and that the EAC will be closed Thursday- Sunday for the Thanksgiving holiday and from . P.m.' on Christmas Eve through New Years Day. Mr. Frey noted the December meeting is typically filmed, at City Hall. He stated the next meeting is scheduled for December 20 but he could find out if the Chambers will be available one week earlier, on December 13. Members discussed availability and indicated a preference for December 13 and if the Chambers is not available on that date, to cancel the December meeting and videotape the January meeting. Mr. Frey stated he will provide Members with attendance reports.and requested feedback whether the next meeting should be held on December 20, rescheduled to December 13, or canceled. X. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by Vice -Chair McCabe at 5:45 p.m. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: January 22, 2013 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting. No action is requested. U) •�f 4roRPOPA��9 • lase Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Molly Tierney Schomburg 5329 Halifax Ave. So. Edina, MN 55424 January 8, 2013 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing to voice my concern about our city allowing the construction of huge homes to take up the entire lot. I have lived in my home on Halifax Avenue for 22 years and have seen radical changes on my block as small, older houses have been replaced by much larger ones. I g2 6t, own dose of this reality this fall when Tony Giannakakis of TC Homebuilders started construction- property line to-property line nextdoor. While TC Homebuilders may be completely within his rights to build such a huge house so close to mine, l find it hard to believe that the city has not done anything to discourage this practice now so prevalent throughout Edina. I am very concerned about drainage from the newly constructed home to mine. The heavy snow before Christmas piled up on the roof of the garage next door and later slid down onto my sidewalk and side entry steps, crushing the plants that I have growing there. If nothing is done, spring rain will flow directly from that garage roof into the foundation of my house. At a meeting with Tony and Jamie from the City this fall, I was told that gutters would go up as soon as the siding was completed. Tony also said that the landscaping work was being done in the fall and that he would make sure that the drainage plan was in place at that time. The city also assured me that the builder must comply with the proposed drainage plan on record. But I have yet to see any progress in this area. .1 feel that my property rights have been tremendously violated and I have done nothing to deserve this. Please be pro - active on this issue and amend the city or to restrict these builders from building so close and adopt regulation to protect neighbors from the builder's lack of respect. Something must be done to prevent water from flowing into my basement and harming my property further. I look to you and the city for guidance and support to get this done correctly. I thank you for that and hope that this can be accomplished without delay. I invite you to come over and stand on my side steps and feel the discomfort at having this huge fagade and roof looming over you. Thank you for your consideration. Sir Cc: Steve Kirchman Jamie Cynor Wayne Houle J CT ILI V L r� City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear James Hovland / Mayor / City of Edina: January 14, 2013 We request the Edina City Council abide by Minnesota Statute and Edina Ordinance and deny the variance request of 5801 Crescent Terrace. Minnesota Statute and Edina Ordinances require that three conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The courts have maintained it is the applicant who has a heavy burden of proof to show that ALL three prerequisites to the granting of a variance are satisfied. This is because a variance allows property to be used in a manner forbidden by the local ordinance. One of these mandatory conditions states, the variance can only be granted when "the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the petitioner ". The laws emphasize the requirement that a variance be due to circumstances "unique to the property ". The courts have held that practical problems and/or hardships peculiar to the present owner, even hardships such as handicaps, age, and family size, do NOT satisfy the prerequisite because they are not "unique to the property ". Similarly, self selection of home design and back yard amenities would be "peculiar" to the applicant and not "unique to the property ". The variance request is for a Rolling Green neighborhood lot, which despite its pie shape, affords a relatively flat 12,000 SF building pad. Applicant proposes to raze the existing nonconforming setback house and build a home of considerable size, as well as extensive backyard amenities. The applicant's design for both house and rear yard amenities "self create" the "practical problems" that result in the variance request. The practical difficulty would not be unique to the property but peculiar to the applicant's wants and architectural design. Given the 12,000 SF building pad, a wide variety of home designs and back yard configurations could be built without granting of a variance. Additionally, the courts have held that a person who purchases land with knowledge, actual or constructive, of the zoning restraint which is in effect at the time of such purchase is said to have "created" whatever hardship the restriction entailed. Although this does not mean automatic denial of variance request, it is part of the evidence that must be considered in deciding whether there are practical difficulties imposed by the applicant not the ordinance. In this case, the applicant is a potential purchaser but not the current owner. This zoning knowledge, in addition to the proposed home architecture and extensive backyard amenities configuration, clearly "self creates" the practical difficulties for the applicant. Page 11 WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL DENY THE VARIANCE REQUEST ON GROUNDS THAT THE "PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES" OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN FOR HOME AND BACKYARD AMENITIES ARE "PECULIAR" TO THE APPLICANT NOT "UNIQUE TO THE PROPERTY" AND THE APPLICANT HAS "SELF CREATED" THE PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES. Furthermore to prevent future confusion on variance requests, we request the Edina City Council to rule that the Edina Planning Department (EPD) is in error in its findings on the following statements: * "the required setback reduces the buildable area dramatically, pushes anew home farther back on the lot and impacts the ability to provide a reasonable rear yard on such a large lot ". EPD finding that "a reasonable rear yard on such a large lot '.is a personal opinion and criteria that has no legal standing. The Edina zoning ordinance makes no mention of the right to a "reasonable back yard "; nor does it define what a reasonable back yard is. These arbitrary and capricious criteria that have no legal footing are inappropriate criteria for the EPD to offer as justification for variance approval. Edina zoning ordinance references only a 25' rear- -yard (30 on corner rear lots) setback, but is silent on any other back yard rights of property holders. To convey that this applicant should be granted a setback variance to provide "a reasonable back yard on such a large lot" is to confer to applicant a privilege that is not offered to other residents. This EDP criteria for variance approval is arbitrary, capricious and beyond the jurisdiction afforded, by the EPD by the Edina zoning ordinance. * `.`proposed use of house is reasonable; as the proposed home will uphold the established front setback already existing on the lot ". This finding is in direct conflict with the Edina zoning ordinance and is a personal opinion not supported by Edina zoning ordinance.. Edina zoning stipulates a front yard setback rule and makes no reference to exceptions based on a pre - existing nonconforming home that are to be razed. EPD is arbitrary and capricious in this determination that this pre- existing nonconforming location should set the new set back requirement. There is no statute to support this finding. Allowing staff to create zoning law is unlawful. Only through a specific process can the zoning regulations be changed. Staff errors in reaching beyond its jurisdiction when it ignores the requirements set by law and impose their own personal standards. Zoning ordinances should be strictly observed as deviation from these laws can lead to favoritism and corruption. * `..`the practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance include the triangular shape lot and the. resulting amount of front yard that must be maintained given the required setback and the imposition of a deeper front yard setback given the lot has always had a home located closer to the street than neighboring properties ". Page 12 EPD failed to consider pertinent facts of the historical "precedents" and recent building experience established in Rolling Green subdivision that establishes that these factors are not "unique" to the applicant's property but common to many corner lots in the Rolling Green subdivision. Recently there have been a number of cases of non conforming homes razed on corner lots. In these cases, other property owners have dealt with characteristics common to the applicant's corner lots without variances. Applicant's brother at 17 Merilane is an excellent example. Characteristics common to corner lots are the criteria that EPD incorrectly declares are "unique" to applicant's property. (i.e. setbacks that result in larger front to back yard ratios, relative smaller buildable area to total area, limits to backyard space). In fact, the relatively large lot sizes of the Rolling Green neighborhood make these corner lots more common than in other smaller lot size neighborhoods. EPD ignore these pertinent facts which results in the arbitrary and capricious recommendation for variance. In conclusion, the Edina City Council should rule in accordance with state and local zoning ordinances and deny the variance request. Personal opinions on best use of property should never overrule zoning ordinance protections. We would welcome new neighbors and a new home, but respectfully demand the zoning protections afforded the property owners by Minnesota and local law. Hopefully, the applicants will pursue a revision of their plans that meet the zoning ordinance without variance request or choose another Rolling Green property. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter. Kip Knelman (612 -850 -3110) Suzanne Knelman (859- 707 -5639) 4812 Rolling Green Parkway Edina, MN 55436 Page 13 January 18, 2013 Michael Thompson 6908 Dawson Lane Edina, MN 55435 Mayor and City Council City of Edina 4801 W. 50 "' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dcar Mayor Hovland and Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, amt Uenson 1 am.writing to thank each one of you for appointing me to a term on the F,dina Transportation C:onnnission two years ago. 1 enjoyed my time on the 1?grC mid the important lnttMves promoted Including l.A"ng Streets. :\ good community conversation is underway and implementation is no\\, the key. With I:dma leading an effort towards a more pedestrian friendly and diverse transportation system tough decisions are inevitable, however positive outcomes will be plenty for Future generations. The highlight of serving was building relationships with my fellow commission members. The community is very fortunate to have such a passionate group of volunteers. "I hank you for your service and the time and effort each one of you devotes to\va"l nuking Ihr conuMUnity a great place Po live. Keep up the good work! Singer %ely, Michael Thompson firc Member 2011-2013 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:16 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: 4016 Lynn Avenue = Lynette Bjunno, Receptionist NIke' 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoCDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Karen Heine jmailto:kheine@straticom.usl Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:11 AM To: Cary Teague; Edina Mail; Edina Mail Subject: 4016 Lynn Avenue As 21 year residents —at 4016 Lynn Avenue- who work and volunteer in Edina and have three children in Edina schools, we are considering moving. Property stakes are in place for a big addition at 4014 Lynn Avenue, and a tear down is about to happen to our south, which will block our light and eliminate our privacy. Light, privacy, and loving the character of Morningside were the main reasons we bought our house. Five years ago we got signatures from neighbors and had to go before the planning committee in order to put on a 6x10 foot entryway. Now, Dave Alan can come in and make major changes to 4018 Lynn Avenue and we don't have a say. Why was the city so concerned about all of the houses being in row and having equal setbacks, but doesn't care if houses are way out of scale on height and the backyard setbacks? The setback changes that have been made are not enough for 50 foot lots. We are in our yard a lot and have invested a lot in gardens and patios. Soon, that will become a waste of money because the gardens will be shaded and we won't have privacy. We will need to invest over $5,000 for trees on the south side of our backyard, and that will only give us a fraction of the privacy we currently have. Dave Alan has not built a single house in Morningside that does not look out of place with the surrounding houses. They are not to scale and tower over the houses on either side. The Edina City Council and the Edina Planning Commission are allowing an outside builder to build a house that ruins the enjoyment and privacy of our house, and increases our property taxes. We are thoroughly disappointed with the leadership in Edina. -Karen Heine and Paul Nicholas Susan Howl Importance: High To: Edina Mail; James Hovland Subject: Great job on the call tonight I was in line for over 30 minutes to make a comment on tonight's Town Hall Call with Mayor Hovland, which is a positive indication that the call was a success! While I wasn't able to make my comment on the call due to time restraints, I would like to take the opportunity to point out that people like Emily and her son (the first caller), Jim (concerned about lighting in his neighborhood) and I believe, William who walks in the indoor malls with his wife, would be welcome to come to The Promenade as well as Centennial Lakes Park where there are well lit walkways and bike paths as well as extraordinary sculptures on The Promenade to enhance their healthy walk. My husband and I enjoy using the Edinborough Park indoor track, walking in the Galleria and Southdale in colder weather as well as Centennial Lakes and The Promenade. The Farmer's Market at Centennial Lakes is a wonderful addition to our city's culture and tradition. Having lived in Europe for over 20 years, I was able to go to outdoor markets to buy fresh foods and flowers as well as other items on a daily basis. It would be a great addition to allow Edina's artists to offer their artwork for display and sale at the Farmer's Market. Can we make that happen? Lastly, two other areas where Edina residents and visitors can get exercise and appreciate the outdoors and public art are 50th and France and Grandview Square Park. Each of the three locations offer a different walkinf• experience. Barbara La Valleur Barbara La Valleur La Valleur Communicates 7621 Edinborough Way Unit 2110 Edina, MN 55435 C: 612 -578 -2422 barbara.lavalleurCa-gmail.com Chair, Edina Public Art Committee Member, Edina Art Board Blogger, Art & Culture, EdinaPatch EDINA: Every Day I Need Art Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:40 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte; Ann Kattreh Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Town hall question Good morning,. This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Jennifer Bennerotte Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov '_J For Living, }. earning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Winnie and Steve Martin rmailto:martins60l2 @gmail.comI Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:21 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Town hall question I was hopeful that I would have the opportunity to broach the subject of additional "Off.-Leash Area's /Dog Parks" in Edina so perhaps you could get some feedback from residents, sooner, rather than later. My name is Winnie Martin and I live at 6012 Ewing Ave. S. I am a current member of Concord Wellness Committee and I am actively involved in making Edina more of a "do" friendly community. I am currently working with Tim Hunter for a proposal to expand the theme of "walkable neighborhoods" by 1. Expanding Off- leash/Dog Park Areas (Long -term) 2. Utilizing current ice rinks Apr. -Oct. for Off -Leash access. I have formal proposals that will be submitted with the help and guidance from Officer Hunter. I have enlisted the assistance from Katie Meyer (do -town) as well as neighboring Eden Prairie Park and Rec. De pt. to assist as needed. (Eden Prairie has 6 Off -leash areas.) I have emailed Ann Kattreh as to my initial efforts, and look forward to broaching this subject with the council in the near future. A canine is an excellent fitness partner and opening access to neighborhood opportunity can be a great way to improve our community. There are no needed funds for more sidewalks, more lights, more patrols, etc ...... just the willingness to open what is at our disposal. I welcome any feedback, discussion, or comments. Thanks. Winnie 952- 484 -5575 martins6012@gmail.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January-1 7, 2013 8:35 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Thanks Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Jennifer Bennerotte. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 -926 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: meg newel) (mailto:megnewell @me.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thanks Great call tonight. 2 things: 1. 1 live on Wooddale and really appreciate the "shared space street" traffic calming measures implemented over the past 6 months. It was courageous and it is appreciated. 2. Might the city consider hosting bicycle safety awareness clinics? As much as I want to increase biking - -it would be nice if all the new bikers recognized the traffic rules intended for them. Thank you! Meg Newell Sent from my mobile phone. M Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:30 AM TO: Jennifer Bennerotte ;c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Very Impressive Town Hall Meeting Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members , John Scheerer and Jennifer Bennerotte. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: TIMOTHY W COATS fmailto:bluewater5 @me.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Very Impressive Town Hall Meeting I want to compliment the mayor for a very impressive use of technology to hold the phone town hall meeting this evening. I have not been involved in Edina affairs before now despite being a 26 year resident. Think i will join the walk this weekend. Well done! PS the crossing at tracy and highway 62 and vernon at highway 62 needs clear sidewalks to support walking! thanks again tim Susan Howl Subject: Thank you! Re: Weight Watchers "One Amazing Day" Invitation Mayor James Hovland, Thank you so much for joining us at Weight Watchers "One Amazing Day" Celebration in Edina on Saturday. It was great to hear how the City of Edina is working to make choosing a healthy lifestyle easier with the walking /biking paths, farmers markets and the do.town collaboration with Bloomington, Richfield and Blue Cross. We appreciate your time and wish you continued success with your efforts! Thank you, Cindy Hemphill Weight Watchers Leader /At Work Specialist Marketing Specialist - Territory 3173 cd hem phill c(D.att.net 612 - 819 -6614 (cell) 1 Susan Howl Subject: Sewer back -up resolution To The Edina City Council, My name is Andrew Cowley and I live at 6429 Josephine Ave. in Edina. The first Sunday in December, the sewer line in front of my house clogged and backed up into my home for the second time in less than 2 years. While the damage done was less than last time, we still lost a good portion of the basement and have been rebuilding to make the space livable again. I had a conversation with both the head of the public works department and the Mayor explaining that I did not believe that it was normal for the city sewer line to clog twice in less that two years and I was concerned that there was serious issues with the sewer line running down Josephine Ave and specifically in front of my house. Needless to say, the public works director did nothing to allay my fears and continually attempted to limit the liability of the city. He even went so far as to say it was the fault of the citizens of Edina and that because my house, "was the lowest on the street, there was nothing I can do to protect my house and prevent it from happening again." The city insurance refused to take responsibility and left the responsibility to my insurance company. So, why am I writing? I want to know now that you have passed a substantial pay raise for yourselves - which I support - what are you going to do to re- compensate me for the damage done repeatedly to my home due the Edina City sewer line and what assurances can you provide me that the sewer line is in working order so as to prevent further damage to my home so I don't lose my homeowners insurance due to multiple claims? Also, what are you going to do in the future if this happens again - will I just get the brush -off like I did this time? Is all the city needs to do in this situation is say, "well, we did maintenance on the line in the last 4 years so we aren't responsible." I would submit that the city needs to take responsibility for the failures of its infrastructure. On a positive note, we were home the day the backup occurred and the response time of the city workers was very fast. Unfortunately, not fast enough to prevent extensive damage, but I was impressed with the response time on a weekend morning. A response would be greatly appreciated as I never heard back from the Mayor on this matter. Thank you for your time. Andrew Cowley 6429 Josephine Ave Edina, MN 55439 952- 913 -5368 acowley l Q,me.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:56 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: My Concerns About Slavery Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoCilEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 8c. Doing Business From: Slavery Footprint [mai Ito: no- reply @slaveryfootprint:orgl Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:P PM To: Edina Mail Subject: My Concerns About Slavery Dear James Hovland, I want to see an end to modern -day slavery, a crime that continues today and is present ever here in our city. I respectfully ask that you help make our city a leader in the fight to end slavery. The first place to start is to ensure that our law enforcement are trained to identify victims of trafficking. Once victims of trafficking have been identified, we need a system in place that ensures the safety and rehabilitation of victims. Our law enforcement should be equipped to conduct proactive, victim - centered trafficking investigations and be prepared to help with the prosecution of trafficking crimes. I respectfully ask that you allocate funding in your budget for training of law enforcement. At a minimum, I want our police department to have one officer trained as a point - person for cases of human trafficking and slavery. Victims of human trafficking face a horrific life in which they are threatened, beaten, raped, starved, locked up, or psychologically manipulated - all for the financial profit of human traffickers. I urge you to help us in this fight. To notify voters in our area about what your administration is doing to protect the victims of human trafficking in our city and to prosecute those who perpetrate this crime, please e-mail a copy of an open letter or statement on the issue to: mycity_(a�slaveryfootprint.org. Sincerely, Jacob Grant jakeuitarl 2r�gmail.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:51 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: My Concerns About Slavery Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(c�EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families. Doing Business From: Slavery Footprint rmai Ito: no -repel r slaveryfootprint.or41 Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: My Concerns About Slavery Dear James Hovland, I want to see an end to modern -day slavery, a crime that continues today and is present ever here in our city. I respectfully ask that you help make our city a leader in the fight to end slavery. The first place to start is to ensure that our law enforcement are trained to identify victims of trafficking. Once victims of trafficking have been identified, we need a system in place that ensures the safety and rehabilitation of victims. Our law enforcement should be equipped to conduct proactive, victim - centered trafficking investigations and be prepared to help with the prosecution of trafficking crimes. . I respectfully ask that you allocate funding in your budget for training of law enforcement. At a minimum, I want our police department to have one officer trained as a point - person for cases of human trafficking and slavery. Victims of human trafficking face a horrific life in which they are threatened, beaten, raped, starved, locked up, or psychologically manipulated - all for the financial profit of human traffickers. I urge you to help us in this fight. To notify voters in our area about what your administration is doing to protect the victims of human trafficking in our city and to prosecute those who perpetrate this crime, please e-mail a copy of an open letter or statement on the issue to: mycitynslaveryfootprint.org. Sincerely, Miranda Rowenhorst mdrowenhorst@gmail.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:16 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: 4016 Lynn Avenue ¢�== Lynette Biunno, Receptionist f l[ . ",, _ 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 'IbiunnoCEdinaMN.w ov g ��� ...For Living,'.earning, Raising Families Doing Business From: Karen Heine [mailto:kheine(a)straticom.usl Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:11 AM To: Cary Teague; Edina Mail; Edina Mail Subject: 4016 Lynn Avenue As 21 year residents —at 4016 Lynn Avenue- who work and volunteer in Edina and have three children in Edina schools, we are considering moving. Property stakes are in place for a big addition at 4014 Lynn Avenue, and a tear down is about to happen to our south, which will block our light and eliminate our privacy. Light, privacy, and loving the character of Morningside were the main reasons we bought our house. Five years ago we got signatures from neighbors and had to go before the planning committee in order to put on a 6x10 foot entryway. Now, Dave Alan can come in and make major changes to 4018 Lynn Avenue and we don't have a say. Why was the city so concerned about all of the houses being in row and having equal setbacks, but doesn't care if houses are way out of scale on height and the backyard setbacks? The setback changes that have been made are not enough for 50 foot lots. We are in our yard a lot and have invested a lot in gardens and patios. Soon, that will become a waste of money because the gardens will be shaded and we won't have privacy. We will need to invest over $5,000 for trees on the south side of our backyard, and that will only give us a fraction of the privacy we currently have. Dave Alan has not built a single house in Morningside that does not look out of place with the surrounding houses. They are not to scale and tower over the houses on either side. The Edina City Council and the Edina Planning Commission are allowing an outside builder to build a house that ruins the enjoyment and privacy of our house, and increases our property taxes. We are thoroughly disappointed with the leadership in Edina. -Karen Heine and Paul Nicholas Susan Howl Subject: FW: resident caller A resident by the name of Ann O'Connor who lives at 7200 York Ave. S. called in response to your Phone Town hall last nite. She did not want to leave a vm or call your office line but wanted to relay a couple of things to you. She enjoyed the call for the most part but had to jump off after 35 minutes, other things to do. She wanted to say it was informative and interesting and that she really appreciates having Centennial Lakes Park at her doorstep! She feels the park is an "oasis within the city." =_- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 � �,' �, ' IbiunnoaEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ; ...For Living, Learning, Raising Fan.iffles & Doing I3usiness Susan HoWI From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:48 PM To: ED Everyone; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: December 2012 Website Report Good evening! We use Google Analytics to monitor activity on our website. Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of December 2012: Total visits: 50,042 Number of unique visitors: 35,374 Average time of each visit: 2 minutes, 18 seconds Total page views: 134,030 Nearly 61 percent of visitors came just one time. 39 percent visited more often. Besides the home page, the most visited page was the Edinborough Park home page with 11,104 page views. Other top pages included the following (with number of page views): Centennial Lakes Park Ice Skating — 7,290 Centennial Lakes Park — 6,997 Edinborough Park General Info — 5,590 Edinborough Park Adventure Peak — 5,387 Edinborough Park Virtual Tour— 2,125 Braemar Arena — 2,062 Edina Art Center —1,979 Edina Liquor— 1,943 Braemar Golf Courses —1,791 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the Oct. 17, 2010 Crime Activity Report. Other frequently downloaded files included the following: Recycling Calendar Recycling Brochure Application for Appointment Planning Commission Variance Edinborough Park Park Press Southwest "Name Your Neighborhood" Map Centennial Lakes Park Calendar Comprehensive Plan Chapter 6 Community Street Map The most popular blog category was City Manager Scott Neal's blog, followed by Police Chief Jeff Long's blog and the Parks & Recreation blog. The most popular blog posts were "Detective Lutz: 40 Years as an Edina Police Officer," "Another Story About Teardowns in Edina" and "Is it Ice Yet ?" The most searched for words or phrases were "recycling," "ice skating," "zoning map," "skating," "ice rinks," "jobs," "employment," "wedding" "ice rinks" and "police." Speak Up, Edina Activity on the "Speak Up, Edina" website reflected the following activity during the month of December 2012: Total visits: 514 Number of unique visitors: 403 Average time of each visit: 3 minutes, 28 seconds Total page views: 2,360 More than 64 percent of visitors came just one time. Nearly 36 percent visited more often. Almost all activity on the site was centered around the Name Your Neighborhood project. Ecommerce Besides the building permits sold through LOGIS applications, ecommerce on our site totaled more than $16.316 in December. Top sales were Art Center program registrations, $6,226; Adventure Peak birthday parties, $3,490; Adventure Peak 10 -punch passes, $1,716; and dog licenses, $1,581. Webstreaming We have been streaming video on our website through Granicus for several years. In December, there were 555 views through Granicus. The most requested videos on Granicus in December were the Dec. 4 City Council meeting, 112; Dec. 18 City Council meeting, 75; Dec. 11 City Council meeting, 70; Dec. 12 Planning Commission meeting, 37; December episode of "Beyond the Badge," 23; Nov. 20 City Council meeting, 19; Nov. 28 Planning Commission meeting, 13; early December episode of "Agenda: Edina," 12; Oct. 10 Planning Commission meeting, 12; and November Human Rights & Relations Commission, 11. We have been streaming all programming on YouTube since January 2011. In December, there were 2,501 views on the City's YouTube channel. The most requested videos on YouTube in December were the residential sprinklers public service announcement, 175 views; late December "Agenda: Edina" segment on John Keprios, 119; Braemar Golf Dome commercials, 117; 2012 Edina Tree - Lighting Ceremony, 115; early December "Agenda: Edina" segment on Starbucks, 94; Oct. 25, 2012 Rotary Club of Edina meeting, 86; Braemar Golf Dome Commercial No. 1, 77; early December episode of "Agenda: Edina," 58; and December episode of "Beyond the Badge." Please continue to review our new website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, please contact me. If you have things that need to be fixed, please write to helpdesl< @EdinaMN.gov. Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director �{ 952- 833 -9520 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 JBennerotte(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov r ...For Living, Learning, Raisin;; Families & Doing Business Susan Howl To: Ric Dressen, Supr., EPS Cc: Kaylin Martin; Jeff Long; Karen M. Kurt; Scott Neal; Prof Eric Madfis; Edina Mail; Council Member Joni Bennet; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Council Member Josh Sprague; Council Member Ann Swenson; Sherry Engelman; Aaron White Subject: Could Rampage Homicidal Violence Occur in Edina Public Schools? Dear Dr. Dressen: Having grown up while attending Edina public schools (Cornelia and Creek Valley Elementary schools, Valley View Junior High School, and Edina East Senior High School, and further to my 01 -11 -13 offer to avail you of a printed- and -bound copy of Professor Eric Madfis' timely and poignant, June 2012 doctoral dissertation, the same being aptly titled, "Averting the Unlikely: Fearing, Assessing, and Preventing Threats of Rampage Violence in American Public Schools" [emphasis added] (an introduction to which is featured in, "30s. Analyzing and preventing, school shootings "), and in the earnest hope of piquing your interest herein, please allow me the indulgence of sharing the following passages from Dr. Madfis' dissertation with you (excerpted and quoted out of context in contemplation of the rhetorical question captioned in the subject heading above): [T]he shootings of the late 90's changed the problem awareness of school violence in such a manner that even predominantly white suburban and rural communities were no longer able to disassociate from the potential threat posed by cases of extreme violence. Further, as an apparent widespread phenomenon, these types of communities no longer perceived school violence as an unfortunate problem unique to distant urban areas. In addition to the expansion of the school violence problem into communities which had previously felt more or less immune to the phenomenon, rampage violence has emerged as a social construct into a broadly universal threat that is possible, and even likely, to plague any school at any time. The reality is that schools are the safest location that exists for American children, school shootings are rare events, and rampage attacks in the infamous model of Columbine High School where multiple victims are killed are even less likely (Borum et al. 2010; Donahue et al., 1998; Muschert 2007). Despite this actual rarity, the risk perception of school rampage has vastly increased since the turn of the 21 st century. For example, Principal Anderson stated that, "There used to be a day where people would say, `Well, that's not going to happen in my town.' And we all know now you can't say that anymore." Likewise, Officer Dudley, a school resource officer who was stationed at a suburban high school, informed me that he "truly believe[s] that [school rampages] could happen anywhere... Don't think it couldn't happen in your town." Cohen (2002: xii) wrote in the 30th anniversary edition of his seminal text, "the slide towards moral panic rhetoric depends less on the sheer volume of cases, than a cognitive shift from `how could it happen in a place like thisT to `it could happen anyplace. "' Thus, many school officials continue to exhibit a perspective which almost perfectly exemplifies the reaction of a moral panic. Such a perspective also reflects what Tversky and Kahneman (1986: 49) refer to as the "anchoring" heuristic whereby people identify harm and estimate likelihoods by basing their knowledge on a particular starting point that may not reflect reality. As the media disproportionately focuses on particularly sensational and violent events such as school shootings, these types of occurrences are misperceived to be more commonplace. Certainly rare but devastating events must be taken seriously (as Posner 2004 points out), but it is not necessarily a given that high potential costs (even the lives of innocent youth) automatically supersede low probabilities.4 Given the current news /entertainment environment in which media conglomerates capitalize on the most rare and sensational events in order to instill fear and maintain viewership (Kappeler & Potter, 2005), however, the perception that a series of school rampage shootings at the turn of the 21st Century constituted a full - fledged crime wave became rather commonplace. [Emphasis added.] The above quotations and the many more similar comments that school administrators revealed to me[,] echo what Best (1999) critiques as the problematic construct of patternless and pointless "random violence." The pervasive misperception that school rampages are random acts of violence not only distorts the level of risk and increases fear such that they seem more likely to occur than in reality, but it also encourages people to think that there are no recognizable patterns in terms of who the victims and offenders of this crime are, nor that any real identifiable causes exist. [Emphasis added.] As Best (1999) points out, crime is not patternless, as victimization and offending patterns vary substantially by gender, race, class, and age. The trope of randomness perpetuates the misleading notion that violence is equally likely to happen to anyone and similarly that anyone can equally become a perpetrator. Secondly, the idea of random violence inaccurately depicts crime as pointless, though even the most seemingly irrational misdeeds typically have a purpose in the mind of the offender. It is true that suburban and rural schools that were not used to having to deal with much violence of any kind did have to contend with a particularly terrifying threat specific to their types of communities that was occurring with greater frequency at the end of the 20th century (Fox, Levin & Quinet 2008). However, it is vital to recall the frequently overlooked facts that these events are still unevenly distributed across suburban and rural schools (Kimmel & Mahler 2004; Kimmel 2008) and that they do tend to occur in the context of particular social circumstances (Levin & Madfis 2009; Newman et al. 2004). School rampage shootings occur almost exclusively in less populated homogeneous communities in ideologically conservative districts (Kimmel & Mahler 2004; Newman et al. 2004). This fact has led various scholars to locate the cause of these events in a pervasive gun culture (Glassner 2009; Haider - Markel & Joslyn 2001; Lawrence & Birkland 2004; Webber 2003) and the stultifying closeness and pressure to conform in small towns (Newman et al. 2004; Madfis & Levin 2012). Rampage shootings also tend to occur more often than not when particular social circumstances arise, such as when the school staff and student body are intolerant of differences (especially regarding gender nonconformity) and when bullying is not addressed or taken seriously by teachers or administrators (Kimmel & Mahler 2004; Levin & Madfis 2009; Newman et al. 2004; Madfis & Levin 2012; Vossekuil et al. 2002). [Emphasis added.] Finally, while school rampage perpetrators lack a single unifying profile (Vossekuil et al. 2002), they do tend to share various troubling life experiences (Levin & Madfis 2009; Madfis & Levin 2012) and are often motivated by the desire to attain vengeance and lasting recognition via a masculine display of power - asserting violence [emphasis added] (Larkin 2009; Larkin 2010; Levin & Madfis 2009; Kalish & Kimmel 2010; Kimmel & Mahler 2004; Klein 2006b; Neroni 2000; Tonso 2009), while females have been heavily disproportionately represented among the victims (Klein 2005; Klein 2006a). Despite these fairly clear and consistent patterns, the way that many school administrators, taking their cue from members of the media, utilize the random trope (i.e. the notion that school rampages are happening everywhere at any time in a pointless and patternless random fashion) distorts the meaning and magnitude of the.threat,.in the same manner that depicting violence more generally as random distracts people from its genuine causes and consequences. Best (1999) argued specifically that the problematic rhetoric of randomness is useful for mobilizing social concern while eliminating the need to explain crime patterns and causes. As a result of the fact that school and police authorities mistake school rampage as random meaningless patternless violence, we can understand their use of a risk control approach that stresses assessment, target hardening, and preventative deterrence rather than solutions to alleviate underlying problems and tensions. [Emphasis added.] 4 For example, one might argue that while bullying may not typically be fatal, it affects the lives of a far larger segment of American school children than school rampage. Therefore, if one were to employ Bentham's (1789/1970) utilitarian principal concerning the greatest good for the greatest number of people, school programming and policy should be directed away from concerns about school rampage and towards bullying prevention. [Emphasis added.] [Editorial Note: To put this footnote in perspective, however, so that a properly balanced and weighted approach can be taken toward developing any individual comm unity's school violence prevention policies and procedures, one must have the benefit of the entire set of findings and background material found in Dr. Madfis' dissertation (or gleaned from other similarly state -of -the -art, peer - reviewed,' authoritative sources). This knowledge foundation is necessary to inform an intimate but empirical understanding of both the pervasiveness and the gravity of the prevalent social mores, values and attitudes in the community in question, and how its members both commit to and act upon same; particularly with regard to the relative profundity with which they are both communicated and enforced. Moreover, it is likewise imperative that educational administrators understand the social, political and economic structures and processes that both give rise to, and perpetuate, the social - psychological inertia of these social interaction "road signs" (if you will). Furthermore, to be both efficacious and well - guided, policy developers must also have a firm etiological grasp on the "complex nexus of causes [of rampage violence], at the indi- vidual, community and sociocultural levels ". This also implies an empirically -based understanding (guided by both the authoritative scientific literature and the extant cutting -edge research methods) of any given community's unique matrix of mass - gun - violence threat and risk probabilities. Therefore, regardless of the politics, and despite the fact that incidents of mass gun violence are not increasing as it is commonly misperceived, if only for the public relations aspect (if not for the municipal liability aspect) given the advent of the pervasive Homeland Security initiative following 9/11, every community in America should formulate a policy response and an action plan designed to coordinate the reasonable utilization of available community resources (under the circumstances) toward mitigating the risk of mass gun violence. The need for :o. vehicles:.. such policy Gun - Related Deaths in U.S. Set to Pass Auto Fatalities 32,03 and program The number of people killed by firearms in the U:S is projected to exceed traffic, fatalities for !he first time by 2015, development Deaths caused by: — Motor vehicles — Firearms a.ca; ....._ . ......... _.._... _ .. ... ... . .... iscompelled or ............................_..............................._.................................................._................................................................................................. ............................... by the fact shootingsas �� ..........., r .._ .......... _ ....._ ........_ .... •.�: ��° that simply ^oa ...... _ ... . because54. tic!...,......._ ..... .................._......,...._ ........................... _..................................:............................_...,._..._._..... ..._..,.,.........._........... 2015 projection.: mass gun remaining Firearms: violenceis s;�cf 'ie ........................ ._..._. _........... ............ ... .._..........._. _ _.. .............:...:..... 32,929.. not Motor data compiled by Bloomberg, the news organization concludes: n :o. vehicles:.. increasing, °. R 32,03 thatdoesn't , - , a.ca; ....._ . ......... _.._... _ .. ... ... . .... _.............. _ mean that �._y, �.. shootingsas �� ..........., r .._ .......... _ ....._ ........_ .... •.�: ��° _� -..:. a whole are remaining status quo as MWO well (witness 1070 '6o 'fit '32 '83 'a*a 'rr, "83 '$7 'R8 `8v P? '�l '�2 'n3 '0' T)5 '9r Y,7 �s 'rxt its 'o, cz .� oa �; r�r, p7 0o nn !e „ ,. , � ,., ,., the recent Nau�, r?ro;( -;ard <,h:g hi n, NOW, ID 2G,S Wv? ed an 10 year aw iaGe (yk-Ath bile M. dildn -. l'gcaml IFI:. ^.I SiFS include hanlie,•::rs, ;:;Ice ^.0 ^. Ind 5i`.[:Cll nlr international Sovrc: CL -res (a D'Sease C n vol and PreverdiDq data compi'ed 15y 81wrlbelg cili,;.Inc Aiet ;11:TC::1 Bla- ornberg coverage of, (1Cr :`gt{:NdisCiIIJ:11DG91IN:1 I:U'15 GOVERNMENT "Taft High School Shootine In Kern, CA Comes Less Than A Month After Sandy Hook Tragedy In Newtown, CT ". Based on data compiled by Bloomberg, the news organization concludes: n "Guns and cars have long been among the leading causes of non - medical deaths in the U.S. By 2015, firearm fatalities will probably exceed traffic fatalities for the first time. " "Shooting deaths in 2015 will probably rise to almost 33,000, and those related to autos will decline to about 32,000, based on the 10 -year average trend." [Emphasis added.] Of course, irrespective of their relative safety, schools and other institutions that serve a relatively dependent, defenseless, or otherwise vulnerable population (e.g., mental health facilities, nursing /convalescent homes (e.g., Sunrise of Edina), and hospitals (e.g., Fairview Southdale), etc.), deserve top priority. Notwithstanding such special attention having been piqued as of late, even a casual awareness of the problem reveals that no organizational site is immune from such an attack; whether it be a commercial enterprise (e.g., historically speaking, malls like Southdale), a government facility (e.g., City Hall or Hennepin County District Court, Southdale Branch) or an educational institution (e.g., MSU- Mankato satellite campus). (Emphasis added.)] * "School shootings have declined dramatically in the past few decades [...]. School, statistically speaking, remains the safest place a child will likely ever be, with the lowest chance of being killed. 'When you consider the fact that there are over 50 million schoolchildren in America, the chances are over 1 in 2 million -- not a high probability,' [Prof. James Alan] Fox said. 'And most cases that do occur are in high schools and less so in middle schools -- and hardly ever in elementary schools. "' Please know that our sole motivation in sharing these dissertation findings is to impart state -of -the -art knowledge to the pertinent processes of public policy development as they endeavor to reconcile Second Amendment rights with the unbearably tragic victimization, the horrific spectacle, and the profoundly stigmatizing national shame of mass schoolyard murder in America. In the spirit of service to our fellow Edina residents, I remain, Very truly yours, Terry Gruzebeck 7350 York Ave. So., Apt. 104 Edina, MN 55435 -4724 952- 842 -9361 t Susan Howl Subject: Edina Housing Statistics - December 2012 and Year -End Good Afternoon Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council - Attached please find the most recent housing.statistics from the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS®, for the City of Edina and the Twin Cities metro area. This report describes our market in December 2012, with additional summaries for the entire year. Note that the December summary also includes Year -to -Date data, which is Year -End data. Please let me know if you have any questions. As always, if you are interested in seeing more in -depth statistics and figures for your city or other cities and counties in the metro — please feel free to check out our online statistical reports at www.mplsrealtor.com. The Thing, our interactive market analytics tool, is very useful, as it offers many choices of variables for your review. Check it out here: http : / /thething.mplsrealtor.com/ (January 2012) — Decreased supply, strong demand and higher prices are among the encouraging developments in 2012 that make the case for continued recovery in 2013. Consumer purchase demand increased organically, absent any government incentives. As the active supply of homes for sale fell to 10 -year lows, absorption rates improved to levels also not seen since 2003. Multi- decade low interest rates and record housing affordability resulted in a 16.9 percent increase in home sales for the 13- county metro. "We are very encouraged by the recovery. Listing activity slowed, which led to less inventory, and buyers became motivated by low rates, rising rents and more job opportunities," said Andy Fazendin, President of the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS ®. Improvements in the local economy will boost the Twin Cities real estate market in 2013. The outlook is positive: slow but steady job growth, attractive interest rates and an unemployment rate well below the nation's are all reasons the area continues to outperform. 2012 by the Numbers (Twin Cities 13- County Metro Area) • Sellers listed 65,914 new homes on the market, a modest 4.3% decrease from 2011 and a 10 -year low. • Buyers purchased 48,641 homes, up 16.9% from 2011 and the highest figure since 2006 (783 units shy of that year's peak). • Inventory levels dropped 31.8% from 2011 to 11,875 units, the lowest level in 10 years. • Months' Supply of Inventory dropped 42.2% to 2.9 months. • The Median Sales Price of closed sales was up, rising 11.9% to $167,900. • Cumulative Days on Market was down 20.6% to 117 days, on average. • Lender - mediated properties made up a smaller share of overall activity. • 34.6% of all New Listings were lender- mediated (either foreclosures or short sales), down from 41.9% in 2011 and 42.6% in 2010. 37.3% of all Inventory was lender- mediated, down from 44.4% in 2011 and 47.4% in 2010. 39.7% of all Closed Sales were lender- mediated, down from 50.0% in 2011 and 47.9% in 2010. Julia Parenteau Public Affairs Director Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS® p. (952) 988 -3124 e. iuliap @mplsrealtor.com Twin Cities Sector Dashboard - 21 Property Type Single - Family Condo - Townhouse New Listings 52,279 51,329 - 1.8% 15,762 13,763 -12.7% ('Pending Sales 31,440 37,636 + 19.7% 10,059 11,320 + 12.5% Closed Sales 31,082 36,920 + 18.8% 9,965 11,118 +11.6% Homes for Sale 13,105 9,354 -28.6% 4,093 2,400 -41.4% Median Sales Price $167,000 $184,000 +10.2 % ! $114,900 $125,000 +8.8% i I Days on Market 142 114 -20.2% 164 129 -21.3% Pct. of Orig. List Price Rec'd at Sale 91.1% 94.1% +3.3% 89.2% 93.4% +4.8% Months Supply of Inventory 5.0 3.0 40.4% 4.9 2.5 -47.9% Market Share (New Listings) 75.9% 77.9% 22.9% 20.9% 8.7% Market Share (inventory) 75.2% 78.5% +4.4% 23.5% 20.1% -14.3% I Market Share (Closed Sales) 74.7 % - 75.9% +1.6% 24.0% 22.8% -4.6% Construction Status Previously -Owned New Construction New Listings 63,547 59,986 -5-6% 5,309 5,904 +11.2% i Pending Sales 39,071 45,648 + 16.8% 2,560 3,420 +33.6% Closed Sales I 38,643 44,999 + 16.4% ; 2,521 3,134 +24.3% Homes for Sale 15,839 10,435 -34.1% ' 1,574 1,472 - -6.5% Median Sales Price $145,000 $162,000 +11.7% $280,000 $305,500 +9.1% Days on Market 147 117 -20.4% 197 145 -26.5% iPct. of Orig. List Price Recd at Sale 90.3% 93.7% +3.8% 95.9% 98.6% +2.7% Months Supply of Inventory 4.9 2.7 -43.6% 7.4 5.2 -30.0% Market Share (New Listings) -- 92.2% 91.0% -1.3% 7.7% T 9.0% + 16.2% Market Share (Inventory) 90.9% 87.6% -3.7% 9.0% 12.4% +36.7% Market Share (Closed Sales) 92.9% 92.5% -0.4% i 6.1 % 6.4% +6.3% DI Annual -k P.A LOOP. S• - .,, Sale Type Traditional Distressed 40,029 43,082 +7.6% 28,857 22,832 -20.9% 21,158 30,208 +42.8% 20,914 19,392 -7.3% 20,805 29,343 +41.0% 20,801 19,323 -7.1% 9,683 7,460 -23.0% 7,733 4,451 -42.4% $200,000 $208,800 +4.4% i $115,000 $120,100 +4.4% 141 108 -23.4% 153 129 -15.5% 92.1% 94.8% +2.9% 89.1% 92.7% +4.1% I 5.5 3.0 -46.0% I 4.4 2.8 -37.9% 58.1% 65.4% +12.5% 41.9% 34.6% -17.3% 55.6% 62.6% +12.6% I 44.4% 37.4% -15.8% I 50.0% 60.3% +20.6% 50.0% 39.7% -20.6% Core Cities Entire Region Minneapolis & St, Paul Twin Cities Metro rt r r i 12,627 11,779 -6.7% j 68,886 65,914 -4.3% 7,481 8,872 +18.6% 42,072 49,600 + 17.9% 7,423 8,710 +17.3% 41,606 48,666 +17.0% 2,987 1,910 -36.1% 17,416 11,911 -31.6% $123,000 $145,000 +17.9% $150,000 $167,900 +11.9% 138 113 -18.6% 147 117 -20.7% 90.0% 93.6% +4.0% 90.6% 94.0% + 3.7% 4.8 2.6 -46.1% 5.0 2.9 -42.0% 18.3% 17.9% -2.5% -- -- - 17.2% 16.0% 6.5% - - 17.8% 17.9% +0.3% I - .J(:..,.... f ,,:..; , :.; �. is �;. i+:..�.:, ...:.i :r,; .,,..>rr;r..r: ,.. s+.lr Local Market Update December 2012 �♦'� '., }�;± L:[',•° yi1 •:; 1 .... MINNEAPOLIS AREA AS •OCIATIi,1N 0 RE Al- TOP,S' 0.71NNi: AI'(iL�S AREA - r REALTORS' Region December 2011 -15.5% +0.7% +16.0% Twin Cities Change in ! ~ M Change in V + - ~ Change in 3,391 +0.7% New Listings Closed Sales Median Sales Price Region December 3,377 3,367 3,391 -15.5% +0.7% New Listings Closed Sales 68,886 65,914 Year to Date 2011 2011 2012 + / New Listings 3,377 2,853 -15.5% Closed Sales 3,367 3,391 +0.7% Median Sales Price- $145,000 $168,202 +16.0% Average Sales Price" $185,102 $219,132 +18.4% Price Per Square Foot' $90 $103 +14.4% Percent of Original List Price Received' 90.6% 93.8% +3.5% Days on Market Until Sale 141 108 -23.4% Inventory of Homes for Sale 17,416 11,875 -31.8% Months Supply of Inventory 5.0 2.9 -42.0% December 2011 '2012 Year to Date 3,377 3,367 3,391 -15.5% +0.7% New Listings Closed Sales 68,886 65,914 Year to Date 2011 2012 + / — 68,886 65,914 -4.3% 41,606 48,641 +16.9% $150,000 $167,900 +11.9% $193,341 $210,787 +9.0% $93 $101 +8.1% 90.6% 94.0% +3.8% 147 117 -20.4% 2011 ■2012 -4.3% +16.9% New Listings Closed Sales Local Market update - December 2012 ()CN F'f;C,VRAID 13Y `HE. MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS(,) :, MINN F. A°OOS AREA AK,o::1 ;m- .� REALTORS 66 61 +14.6% -7.6% New Listings Closed Sales 1,256 1,280 +1.9% +36.2% New Listings Closed Sales Change in Median Sales Price from Prior Year (6 -Month Average)" Twin Cities Region �- Edina +20% I +15% +10% +5% 4 -10% -151% .� -20% i -25% ., .. _. -30% - 1 -2008 7 -2008 1 -2009 7 -2009 1 -2010 7 -2010 1 -2011 7 -2011 1 -2012 7 -2012 n 0: i ('i.. r8h'1: ,, ^r7. r".,t.,H '.N1- 11'r:i:ir -7•: ".31;3'.. n ] :'1. 'i. t':1 ;,P P'. f.I :':, ,.1 ',r ;'!'t'• cq .i I,Jir -4 ,.1 t "' Al: ,1F':i .. .,1., lfl•.1.,'11 "1 ..:l: ,.I I'.- :.,... ;l- ,.iS'... )!.;:. .vl ,)]1. .. ..:]�. ..'11r•„ ♦. .. , +14.6% -7.6% +16.7% Y Change in W Change in f Change in Edina New Listings - Closed Sales _ Median Sales Price ---- I - December Year to Date 2011 2012 + / - 2011 2012 New Listings 41 47 +14.6% 1,256 1,280 +1.9% Closed Sales 66 61 -7.6% 699 952 +36.2% Median Sales Price- $299,950 $350,000 +16.7% $339,000 $343,875 +1.4% Average Sales Price' $423,350 $502,467 +18.7% $437,087 $431,962 -1.2% Price Per Square Foot' $153 $168 +9.8% $159 $159 +0.1% Percent of Original List Price Received' 89.2% 93.3% +4.6% 90.4% 92.7% +2.5% Days on Market Until Sale 113 113 0.0% 147 135 -8.2% Inventory of Homes for Sale 356 210 - 41.0% -- -- Months Supply of Inventory 6.1 2.6 - 57.4% December 2011 ■2012 Year to Date 2011 .2012 66 61 +14.6% -7.6% New Listings Closed Sales 1,256 1,280 +1.9% +36.2% New Listings Closed Sales Change in Median Sales Price from Prior Year (6 -Month Average)" Twin Cities Region �- Edina +20% I +15% +10% +5% 4 -10% -151% .� -20% i -25% ., .. _. -30% - 1 -2008 7 -2008 1 -2009 7 -2009 1 -2010 7 -2010 1 -2011 7 -2011 1 -2012 7 -2012 n 0: i ('i.. r8h'1: ,, ^r7. r".,t.,H '.N1- 11'r:i:ir -7•: ".31;3'.. n ] :'1. 'i. t':1 ;,P P'. f.I :':, ,.1 ',r ;'!'t'• cq .i I,Jir -4 ,.1 t "' Al: ,1F':i .. .,1., lfl•.1.,'11 "1 ..:l: ,.I I'.- :.,... ;l- ,.iS'... )!.;:. .vl ,)]1. .. ..:]�. ..'11r•„ ♦. .. , �k ,ass To: Mayor and Council Members Agenda Item #: IX. A. From: Debra Mangen Action ❑ City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information 0 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS Action Requested: None. Information / Background: Attached are letters and a -mails received after the packets were delivered to you. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50w St • Edina, MN 55424 r Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:57 AM Subject: FW: Utility tax This message has.been fiorwarded to the Mayor and City Council. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant I� 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 1 i ekastner(ilEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov — 'or Living„ learning, Raising Fami1iE, �� l)ouig 13i . uiee. From: Vicoula4 0-)aol.com jmailto:Vicoula+C aol.coml Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 1:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Utility tax To all City of Edina Council Members: I am appalled by lack of discretion in dreaming up yet more ways to spend your constituents tax dollars. As if the Referendum money, that seems to always comeback to be renewed whenever it expires, as well as hitting up the residents for street repairs that others cities cover (upwards of $12,000), Now you want to add another tax. As if that isn't enough, then you spend hundreds of thousands to pay for more consultants... where in the heck does some common sense kick in ?. I, for one, am very disappointed in Edina. We have lived here over 30 years and it used to have a favorable tax base. Not any more. Doesn't the example of the ridiculous bike lanes on Wooddale Ave, convince you that some ideas do not work ?. Instead of chasing government grants and trying to use those, lets just stop this nonsense spending. Enough Already!! Vicki Withers Susan Howl Subject: ATTN: Human Rights Commission and Mayor Hovland Dear Edina Human Rights Commission and Mayor Hovland, I read with interest the following paragraph within the Winter 2013 Edina Around Town communique: "Steve Winnick, Chair of.the Human Rights & Relations Commission's Tom Oye Award Committee, emphasized that the definition of the term, 'human rights' has been expanded to include freedom from discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, familial status or national origin." I. have been a resident of Edina for 40 years and have always been proud of my city, most recently in regards to the public proclamation against the 2012 Marriage Amendment. 'Progressive' is a term I would readily assign to our community and its people. With that in mind, I.am writing to inquire how to go about proposing an addition to the list of 'human rights' that:we, as a community, strive to protect from discrimination. Specifically, I would like to respectfully request the Human Rights Commission and /or City consider adding 'gender expression' to your definition. As a mom of a 16 year -old transgender child, who was born at Fairview Southdale Hospital and who has lived and gone to public school in the city his entire life, we have experienced a fair amount of discrimination. That said, we do believe that most incidents of discrimination were based on a lack of knowledge rather than bigotry. Over the last three years our family has become vocal advocates for the transgender community, experiencing first hand the power of information sharing. Partnering with the Human Rights Campaign's Welcoming Schools initiative, in addition to speaking in front of medical professionals, we have learned that awareness fosters acceptance. We believe that if a progressive city like Edina includes 'gender expression' in their description of protected rights, we will be laying the groundwork to open hearts and minds. This might be a naive way of going about implementing change, so please excuse me if there is a more formal process I should be following. I would be happy to provide further information in writing or in person if needed. My Best, Leslie Lagerstrom 4548 Oxford Avenue Edina, MN 55436 952.925.3850 (home) laperstrom22C@comcast.net www.transparenthood.net 1 December 18, 2012 N. C. Little Memorial I- Todpice., III c. Chief Marty Scheerer Edina Fire Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn 55424 Re: Gift of appreciation Dear Chief Scheerer: Once again I write you on behalf of the Little Hospice, expressing our appreciation to you for the great service you and your team provide our community. As you probably are aware, the Little Hospice is a non - profit corporation, not required to pay taxes to the city, but we certainly understand how much we benefit by the fire protection and all other services you offer all citizens of this great community... including us! So, please accept our check in the sum of $1,500 made payable to the Edina Fire Department, this year in honor of the remarkable dedication and competence exhibited by Chief Marty Scheerer, and the inspiration he provides to all citizens of Edina! My best wishes to you and everyone on your department. With gratitude, N. C. Little Memorial Hospice, Inc. Robert J. Solheim Director RJS:bs Encl. cc: NCLMH Board of Directors. i019Lyein:arLane a Edi z,z, d!N»4» • 92.928.9394 fezR 952923,3378 o u,uar.(ittlelavdpiee.vrq • Providine jX6 Z 3 Compassion December 18, 2012 N. C. Little Memorial I- Todpice., III c. Chief Marty Scheerer Edina Fire Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn 55424 Re: Gift of appreciation Dear Chief Scheerer: Once again I write you on behalf of the Little Hospice, expressing our appreciation to you for the great service you and your team provide our community. As you probably are aware, the Little Hospice is a non - profit corporation, not required to pay taxes to the city, but we certainly understand how much we benefit by the fire protection and all other services you offer all citizens of this great community... including us! So, please accept our check in the sum of $1,500 made payable to the Edina Fire Department, this year in honor of the remarkable dedication and competence exhibited by Chief Marty Scheerer, and the inspiration he provides to all citizens of Edina! My best wishes to you and everyone on your department. With gratitude, N. C. Little Memorial Hospice, Inc. Robert J. Solheim Director RJS:bs Encl. cc: NCLMH Board of Directors. i019Lyein:arLane a Edi z,z, d!N»4» • 92.928.9394 fezR 952923,3378 o u,uar.(ittlelavdpiee.vrq MINUTES COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE CITY HALL MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM October 17, 2012 6:30 PM I.. CALL TO ORDER Chair Doscotch .welcomed members and called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Jeff Bartleson, Matt Doscotch, Jan Johnson, Mary Jo Kingston, Nancy Ott - Pinckaers, Carolyn Peterson. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion by Member Peterson and.second by Member Ott- Pinckaers to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Member Ott- Pinckers and second by Member'Johnson to approve consent agenda item N.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting September 11, 2012. All voted aye. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None presented. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Karen Zeleznak, Bloomington Public Health Director, gave a presentation on the community health and nursing services they provide to the City of Edina. Ms. Zeleznak gave a historical perspective of Community Health Services (CHS) funding for city/county public health services. The designated funds must be directed to specific community health programs. Included in these services are Community Health Assessment, Adult and Senior Services, Help Me Grow Program (child development), Safety Net of Services, (qualification depends on income), Women's Health Program, Clinical and Immunization Services, Maternal Child Health, Health Promotion (targeting youth), Creating A Voice (youth assets) and Nurse Clinics (replaced Home Care Program). Also discussed were the quarterly and annual reports. Bloomington staff is involved with the school district, the Edina Resource Center, the Edina Senior Center, faith based organizations and several community groups. Ms. Zeleznak discussed the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), Tri-City Partners activities, community readiness for kids not doing drugs and additional information about the varied programs and their impact on the community. Also discussed was the partnership with Tri -City Partners and campaigns such as Edina Sober Squad, Together We Stand, and Raising Drug Free Kids to connect with youth. General information on the Women, Infants and Children program and also the Sage Screening program for breast and cervical cancer was presented. Ms. Zeleznak reviewed work with the Edina Seniors Program, efforts toward independent senior living, and methods to find seniors in need of assistance. Work is coordinated with Edina police, fire and health departments, local churches, family members, and adult protection for the quickest delivery of assistant to needy seniors. Ms. Zeleznak also discussed recent pertussis cases in. Edina schools, meningitis outbreak, annual flu and pneumonia immunization clinics, planning for "aging" and the Hennepin County Shape Survey on child health. B. Lisa Brodsky, Bloomington Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, gave a presentation on the public health emergency preparedness services provided to the City of Edina. Key aspects include planning for ability to respond to public health emergencies, evaluating resident's ability to respond to emergencies, planning for and exercising distribution of medication, vaccines and supplies, developing and preparing methods to deliver emergency messages to the public, planning communication to reach special populations such as limited English speaking, seniors, people with disabilities, building relationships with Police, Fire and Emergency management. A volunteer Medical Reserve Corp was established and an emergency preparedness tool kit for faith based communities, Ready, Set, Go was developed. An example of public health emergency preparedness response is the recent H1N1 outbreak. Response actions included coordination with the Minnesota Department of Health, public messages regarding importance of vaccination and antiviral distribution to individuals. in priority groups including those uninsured and underinsured, and organizing and conducting timely mass vaccination clinics in local schools. Focus this year has been planning for care of vulnerable populations and air conditioning options in the event of extreme heat. Member Peterson said Bloomington Public Health is an asset to Edina providing a high level of service to all residents, young and old. The Community Health Committee fully supports the.professional efforts of Bloomington Public Health and highly endorses renewing services with them for 2013. Member Peterson said that Edina invested wisely in Bloomington Public Health to provide these important services in our community. Member Peterson made a motion to recommend approval of continued contract services with Bloomington Public Health for 2013. Motion was seconded by Member Ott- Pinckaers. All voted aye. Chair Doscotch thanked Zeleznak and her staff for their presentations and for the wide variety of programs, community involvement, and excellent service they provide to the City of Edina. C. Ruth Tripp, SHIP Grant Coordinator, submitted a written update on current Edina SHIP activities. Current projects include 1) a Community Food Partnership and Community Food Assessment & Taskforce to determine food access /affordability needs of low- income residents, 2) active transportation policy and 3) Safe. Routes To School consultant study. D. Sara Maaske, do.town, gave an update on current do.town activities and initiatives in Edina. Included are 1) an upcoming survey regarding concession choices users want at Braemar Arena and Braemar Golf Course, 2) potential partnership with YMCA for a pilot community garden at Yorktown Park, 3) Safe Routes To School and Walk To School day at elementary schools, 4) resident petitions supporting possible trails and playground equipment in Lake Edina Park and Council support to finance such in the CIP, 5) support of franchise fees to fund future pedestrian and bicycle projects and 6) parent meetings to discuss healthier school food. E. Healthy Eating Active Living Resolution review was tabled for future meeting. Chair Doscotch provided a draft letter of recommendation to Council in support of a pilot community garden at Yorktown Park. All members agreed that a community garden should be piloted based on petitions of interest received through do.town and positive impacts on residents regarding healthy eating, active living and social connectedness. Members were supportive of school based gardens with incorporated curriculums and agreed that a pilot community garden should also encompass a curriculum possibly implemented through the Parks & Recreations excellent programming. Liaison Engelman indicated that this would provide an opportunity for the Community Health Committee to work with the Park Board. A motion was made by Member Ott- Pinckaers to approve the draft letter of recommendation. Member Kingston seconded the motion. All voted aye. F. Omitted G. Liaison Engelman gave an update on the draft 2013CHC Work Plan. New initiatives to the 2013 work plan are 1) develop a health vision for the city, and 2) continue research work of subgroups on youth health, seniors and aging health, and general health for gaps in our system. The youth subgroup discussed bullying as one topic of concern on their agenda and the senior subgroup will work on transportation. The Council will review and finalize all Board/Commission work plans by the end of the year. Chair Doscotch gave a review of the Community Health Committee work session with the City Council regarding the draft 2013 work plan. Members Doscotch, Kingston, Peterson and Ott- Pickaers and Liaison Engelman attended the meeting. Suggestions Council members made for work plan consideration included participating with do.town, more active committee work, option for a baseline community health survey, and additional meetings throughout the year. Members also discussed potential opportunities to partner with other Boards /Commissions such as with the Park Board on a pilot community garden in Yorktown Park and bullying with the Human Rights Commission. Members on the Youth, Seniors and General Health subgroups were encouraged to continue meeting on their respective topics. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None presented. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Member Johnson reported that she and Liaison Engelman attended a "Heart To Heart" community event sponsored by the Minnesota Heart Institute on October 9, 2012. The Institute staged a screening for heart health indicators and an expert medical panel discussion followed on prevention of heart disease. Summary screening results may be available to the Community Health Committee. Member Johnson also reported that the senior subgroup has met to discuss senior issues in Edina, in particular VEAP and transportation concerns. IX. STAFF COACVIENTS Liaison Engelman presented the tentative meeting schedule for 2013 and also discussed the 2013 joint Community Health Assessment with Bloomington and Richfield health boards. The Assessment is scheduled for May 21, 2013. X. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Member Kingston and seconded by Member Ott- Pinckers to adjourn. All voted aye. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 pm. Respectfully submitted, Sherry Engelman Next Meeting: January 15, 2013 2013 Meeting Dates: Jan 15 March 19 May 21 July 16 September 17 October 16 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM NOVEMBER 15, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, Franzen, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Sierks and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Whited to approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF OCT. 25.2012 The following corrections were made: Page 1, in the motion for Approval of Meeting Minutes, change 'Surya' to 'lyer;' page 2, Pedestrian, and Cyclist Safety Fund Policy, paragraph 2, delete '...the ETC suggested the following' and replace with '...the ETC discussed the following options.' Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Whited to approve the amended minutes of Oct. 25, 2012. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT Chair Nelson introduced Peter Bruce whom he invited to attend the meeting. He said Mr. Bruce owns Pedestrian Studies and his expertise may be helpful if a pedestrian sub - committee is formed later on. Mr. Bruce said he specializes in retail foot traffic working with owners who are trying to attract foot traffic to their business - in particular the skyway system in downtown Minneapolis. He has done work for director Houle at York Avenue between 66th Street and 70th Street and is a new Edina resident. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 7, 2012 Section A. I. Director Houle said this will be an additional sign. Section A. 3. Member Whited asked what the speed limit was and when the sidewalk would be installed. Director Houle said the speed limit is 30 mph and 15 or 20 when school is in session. He said he did not know when the sidewalk would be built. He said it is one of four missing segments of sidewalk that draft feasibility studies were prepared for and shared with City Council. The cost is approximately $300,000 and up until recently, it would be assessed but with the new franchise fee they will have to identify criteria and prioritize which sidewalks will be built. Director Houle said he could bring the sidewalk feasibility studies to the December meeting if the ETC would like to see them. Section C. 4. Director Houle said most of the cars belong to staff and the police department is writing warning tickets at this time. He said there is enough parking in the parking lot and that they are parking there for convenience. 41 Section B. 2. Member Janovy said Kellogg Avenue between Valley View Road and 58th Street is a basket weave (a stop sign every other block) and suggested instead of a stop sign on Kellogg Avenue, to put it at 61St Street. Director Houle said staff goes by warrants but the ETC can recommend this to City Council. Chair Nelson said this was requested twice before and each time it was denied. Director Houle said the minor street is 61St Street and the major street is Kellogg Avenue and based on traffic counts, the yield signs are on the wrong street. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass for staff to evaluate moving the yield sign to 61St Street and to also evaluate installing stop signs since the basket weave is already in place and the stop sign would complete the weave. All voted aye. Motion carried. Based on the motion, director Houle said the request would be moved to Section C for further study. Regarding traffic at Chowen Avenue, member Janovy asked how the City deals with this when traffic is going the speed limit but there are complaints. Director Houle said it is expectation and he was hoping the communications committee would be able to offer suggestions. Director Houle said the map showing all traffic requests should be ready next week. Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Bass to forward the Nov. 7 Traffic Safety Committee Report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members Member Schwieger asked about the process for getting streetlights. Director Houle explained that residents can contact the engineering department for a petition form to get support from neighbors for th streetlight. When the °petition is returned to engineering, staff contacts Xcel to determine feasibility of installation and cost; however, since residents are no longer assessed for streetlights, staff will need to review and rewrite the process. Member Braden asked about the process for removing a streetlight and director Houle said he's never actually had this request but since the issue was the light shining into the house, he could look at replacing the standard cobra head light with a cut off cobra head light to prevent this. Member Franzen asked about streetlights in his neighborhood, which is part of the 2013 neighborhood reconstruction. Director Houle said Member Franzen could talk with his neighbors to see if they are in favor of streetlights and if so, director Houle could recommend this to City Council as part of the project. Member Sierks asked why there were three entrances.into the high school and only one exit. Director Houle said the decision was made by the school as a private property owner and it works well for traffic on the street because staff prefers that traffic queues onsite when getting out instead of queuing on the street to get in. He said in the afternoons an entrance is turned into an exit, giving them two exits. He said he did not think this would work but staff has observed it and it is working well. Bike Edina Task Force —Oct. 11, 2012 Minutes Director Houle said the Biking on Sidewalk Ordinance would likely be presented to the City Council on Dec. 4 and the police department will have a counter argument. 2 41 Member LaForce asked director Houle about the bike counts that were referenced in the minutes. Director Houle said he did not have the data but he should be requesting them to start a database. Member LaForce said the data is important to counter arguments that the City is spending money on bike lanes when there are no bikers. Member Bass said do.town staff surveyed the cities of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield and 30% of respondents said they ride at least once during the summer in their neighborhood. She said this is not a count but in general, many people are biking. Living Streets Working Group Director Houle said the City Council will receive the ETC's advisory communication at their Nov 20 meeting regarding Phase 2 Final Steps. He explained that the Council's feedback regarding approval 'of $150,000 to finish the policy was that the ETC has expert members that could put the plan together and he asked for their feedback. The consensus was that they are volunteers and finishing the plan requires a lot more time than they can commit. Additionally, it was passed in May 2011 by the City Council as a priority and to date, they have not provided any funding. The ETC recommended that a consultant or staff finishes Phase 2 of the policy. Transportation Options Working Group Co -chair Whited said ITN presented their program at the last meeting. She said they were formed two years ago in Edina and is a volunteer drivers program. Their franchise sells for about $100,000. She is concerned that the group is saying they are the Transportation Options Working Group and that the City has funding. She said also that there might be a conflict with the co -chair being part of ITN and the working group. She said they would like to present their program to the ETC. Director Houle will talk with assistant city manager Kurt regarding the concerns. Motion was made by member Whited and seconded by member Janovy to add the following new members to the Transportation Options Working Group (provided the bylaws do not require the members to be residents of Edina): 1. Susie Johnson (transportation program manager at VEAP) 2. Maria Sanchez (works at CAPSH Community Action partnership of Suburban Hennepin) 3. Peg Gaard (works with seniors through her three separate Augustana Adult Day programs) 4. Fred Arndt (leads a work group at Normandale Lutheran Church that works on senior citizens transportation issues) 5. Robin Rohr (works at Hennepin County in the Human Services Division that assists senior citizens and has served on several working groups on transportation issues) All voted aye. Motion carried. Communications Committee Member LaForce said they are working on a few ideas and they discussed 'why' they are doing what they are doing. He said a lot of the ETC's work plan involves substantial changes in the city — putting in sidewalks and bike lanes where they are not, rules about riding on sidewalks, etc — and these changes will create some resistance. He said there are some things that they can do and things that they should not do because it will hurt their ability to move things forward. He said the role of the committee is to think about the changes that the ETC is making, be proactive and identify what they should be doing to move things forward. He said one focus area that they've identified is articulating clearly to residents that the ETC works on projects or issues that are directed by City Council and this should be followed up with an explanation of 3 the background and benefits which should be based upon policy statement. Additionally, he said they L. should identify core messages and how to get the messages out. Member Bass added that they would be more proactive when they see that a recommendation is going to be problematic and communicate around that particular issue. Regarding the type of communications, member LaForce said they would make recommendations to the communications department staff based on particular issues. He said they should work to get their messages out before the City Council votes on issues. Director Houle and the committee were not sure how the process is going to work with the communications department — will they have a staff liaison working with the committee? Member LaForce feels the communications committee can be used to help the communications department anticipate the issues of our commission and cited the Wooddale Avenue bike lanes as an example. Member Bass asked if a communications plan was developed for the Wooddale Avenue bike lanes. Director Houle said he received permission from City of Minneapolis to use something that he had seen on their website but a formal plan was -not developed. He said the engineering department has a communications plan in place now but not a formal plan that anticipates project specific issues to educate the public. Member Bass described the Wooddale Ave bike lanes as an acute issue that they are saddled with and is hoping that moving forward, if they can talk about the.vision for a more balanced transportation system and better articulate the benefits that this will help to create a broader understanding and less disruption when they try to implement projects. Member Janovy said engineering's role in communications should be to provide the technical expertise to the communications department and let them know when projects are coming up so that a communications plan, can be developed. She said the communications department staff are the communications professional. They should be developing the relationship with the engineering department to stay ahead of the issues, rather than react. She said in their committee discussion she asked, 'What.is the role of the communications department? How do they work to identify the communication needs of other departmentsT Director Houle said he believes they work on hot issues and residents' reaction to the bike lanes took everyone by surprise. He said the communications department does not work with other departments to anticipate upcoming issues. Chair Nelson said the next project is the France Avenue Intersection Enhancements that will impact so many and will be a big communications piece. Member Bass said it seems like the City Council has empowered boards and commissions to make recommendations and help execute the vision of the Council and there is a communications needs in each of the boards and commissions so this will be an ongoing challenge. She said there needs to be a cohesive framework since each one is responsible for a piece of the vision. Director Houle noted that the Energy and Environment Commission has a communications committee. Member LaForce said it looks like the communications from the City is run like a news department — telling some things that are happening rather than framing the narrative, providing context and explaining, and identifying the audience and anticipating the needs, etc. 4 CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Member LaForce asked what they are to do with the correspondences and that he was struck by the range, and strongly worded criticisms. Director Houle said he was asked to give copies of transportation - related communications that are received by engineering to the commission. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Braden said in lieu of attending the Oct. ETC meeting, she attended the final of three taskforce meetings that was tasked with distributing approximately $83,000 for Human Services. (She volunteered to serve on the taskforce last summer when the City Council requested a member from the ETC). They recommended funding the Senior Community Services, Cornerstone, VEAP, the Bridge, Conflict Resolution Center, Door -to -Door, and Normandale Center Oasis for Youth. Member Bass said related to engaging residents about the City's vision for Living Streets, the do.town staff took the four missing segments of sidewalks and invited Councilmembers to conduct a walk /talk with nearby residents. CM Bennett; Sprague and Swenson have signed up to participate. CM Swenson will visit W. 60th Street and School Road. The other three missing segments of sidewalks are Xerxes Avenue, Normandale Road, and W. 42 t Street. Member Franzen said there is a Solar Works seminar going on downstairs for another half hour. Member Nelson said the Southwest Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) is available for review and there is a 90 day comment period. A copy is in the community development department. He also reported that a special meeting is scheduled for Dec. 11 for the public hearings for the 2013 neighborhood projects. Member Franzen asked how are streets grouped together to form a neighborhood for street reconstruction. Director Houle said they are grouped based on liked -sized lots most often. He said in the case of Mendelssohn A, member Franzen's neighborhood, there are two distinct neighborhoods but if they were split into two neighborhoods, one neighborhood would pay more than the other. STAFF COMMENTS Director Houle said two neighborhood informational meetings were held to discuss the ETC's recommendation of a bike lane in the Normandale neighborhood and a sidewalk in the Lake Edina neighborhood. He said a dedicated facility will not fit on West Shore Drive so staff looked at two other options: 1) off -road; and 2) expand the walking path by bringing it to the bike lane. He said residents in attendance were not opposed. He said residents are opposed to the sidewalk on Hibiscus Avenue to Kellogg Avenue in Lake Edina. The recommendation is going to City Council on Dec. 11. France Avenue Pedestrian Improvements is still in the design phase. Hennepin County will be milling and overlaying Vernon Avenue from Crosstown to Grandview Square and Director Houle said he is going to talk to them about striping bike lanes as Vernon Avenue is listed as a primary bike route and the ETC agreed. The community development department is reviewing plans for a coffee shop at Centennial Lakes with a drive thru; a restaurant at 77th Street & France Avenue; and the medical building at 65th Street & France Avenue received approval. 4 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. :,:... 4 �4TRANSP,. ORTAT0 NMCOMM ATTENDANCE, NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session #i "of Mgt Attendance % Meetirigs/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ;1,2ti --- -------------- Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I,0 8356 Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 for x,930/6 I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 a91 Janovy, Jennifer 2/1 /2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 612, X100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11;° ��100% :� Nelson, Paul 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Schwei er, Steven student 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '9'r >'750 .7 Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 3`1' . `100% Thompson, Michael 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 t83 %.; Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P 11-7 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday November 8, 2012 7:01 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:01p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Brandt, Gubrud, Heer, Kostuch, Latham, Risser, Rudnicki, Sokol, Thompson, Zarrin, and Chair Sierks Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Latham to approve the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Dustin Denison, Applied Energy Innovations, came to observe the Edina Emerald Energy Program report. Kristopher Wilson, Edina Garbage Man, came to observe the Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group report. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Recycling & Solid Waste. Member Latham reviewed the proposed updates to City Code Section 1300 — Collection and Disposal of Refuse and Recyclables licensing requirements. All license Haulers must conform to the proposed amended billing practices. Enforcement would be on a complaint basis. The City Attorney will need to review the proposed code if the City Council approves moving forward with the amendments. For transparency of base rates, all surcharges must be identified. Most Members think that if the new 1300.10 code has Subd. 1(Advance notice of rate increase) & subd. 2 (Base rate with all taxes, fees and surcharges included) that Subd. 3 (Requirement of same rate for same service) will not be needed because it is the consumer's responsibility to research and understand their bill. There was a consensus for adding 1300.10 Subd. 1& 2, but a roll call was taken for Subd. 3 regarding approving it. Roll Call was taken on proposed 1300.10 Subd. 3 (Mandatory Uniform Rates: Ayes: Gubrud, Latham, Zarrin Nays: Heer, Risser, Rudnicki, Thompson and Chair Sierks Abstain: Kostuch Subd. 4 Members are in consensus that the City should extend the pickup period beginning date for yard waste from April 15 to April 1, but preferred to allow budget,plans. All Members are in consensus on Subd. 5 requiring a hauler to retrieve their cart at no charge to the resident upon the resident's discontinuing service. The EEC would like to bring this revised code to a City Council Work Session in 2013. Member Latham summarized the challenges regarding the proposed Commercial Recycling mandate with enforcement being the biggest problem given the lack of staff resources. Educating the business community on how to recycle, as well as assisting in removing any recycling barriers they may be experiencing, would be a better approach. Bill Neuendorf supported the education /barrier removal approach. B. Air and Water Quality WG. The October meeting was cancelled. C. Energy WG i. Emerald Energy Program Proposed Changes. Mr. Bintner reviewed the updates for the . commercial program. ii. Residential Energy Project. Public comment was received from Dustin Denison proposing that EEEP include residential properties. Mr Denison is suggested that Bob and Audrey Aderhold be a pilot project and if successful, make revise EEEP accordingly. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the Energy Working Group to review EEEP to possibly add residential property to the program. Motion carried unanimously. D. Education Outreach WG i. November 15 Solar Workshop. Member Gubrud gave an update on the planning and advertising of the workshop. E. Green Step Cities Review and (Concept steps 4 -6). This topic was tabled. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS A. EEEP Letter from Rbt A. Aderhold. The letter was reviewed during Agenda Item VI.C.ii. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. "Annual report" January meeting planning. This topic was tabled. B. Wind and Solar Ordinance. This topic was referred to the Energy Working Group. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Bill Neuendorf— Economic Development Manager. Mr. Neuendorf introduced himself to the Commission. B. Capital Improvement Program 2013 -2017 Draft. Mr. Bintner reviewed the projects that had some clean water or energy relation to land or a building. EEC would like to see more Environmental Projects in the CIP. Member Kostuch would like to see the green procurement policy committee beactivated. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 9:12p.m. Motion made by Member Risser and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respec Ily s mitted, Reb ca�Foster GIS Administrator i MINUTES Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, December 11, 2012 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:05 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Carr, and Members, Davis, Moore, Mellom, Christiaansen, Stegner, Anger, Johnson and Good. Absent were Members Curran and Sussman. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel was also in attendance. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Davis moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Mellom seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES November 14, 2012 Member Mellom moved approval of the minutes from the November 14, 2012 meeting. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT one VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Guest — David Mather, National Register Archaeologist, MN Historic Preservation Office "the Role of Archaeology in Edina's Heritage Preservation Program Chair Carr introduced David Mather who was invited to the meeting to discuss the role archaeology can play in Edina's heritage preservation program. Mr. Mather thanked the HPB for the opportunity to discuss archaeology in Edina —. pointing out that he enjoyed reading Edina's Historic Context Study and Heritage Preservation chapter of the Comp Plan in preparation for his visit. Board members asked Mr. Mather what time period he would consider historic from an archaeological standpoint. Mr. Mather explained that much like antiques, 50 years is the short term age to be considered historic from the archaeological standpoint. However, prehistorically the contexts can date from 10,000 B.C. Mr. Mather added that much of the archaeological work done in Minnesota dates from the Dakota cultural traditions of 1650 A.D. — 185 I. A Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes - -- December 11, 2012 Consultant Vogel commented that there is very little archaeological information that has been discovered about Edina, with the exception of a small dig which took place at the Edina Mill in the late 1970's. The purpose of that dig was to uncover the foundation of the old Edina Mill which had been torn down in 1932. In addition to finding the original footings for the Mill, a few old bottles were unearthed, but not a whole lot more. Mr. Vogel added that because Edina has virtually no vacant land, the areas that have the greatest potential for archaeology would be in the City parks which have for the most part not been disrupted. Mr. Vogel. pointed out that the City of Eden Prairie has identified over 300 archaeological sites, and it stands to reason that the archaeology of Edina would be similar to Eden Prairie since the Native Americans, settled near the same types of water bodies that flow through both communities. However, the reason Eden Prairie has so many sites is due to the fact that the community was developed much later than Edina and environmental impact studies were required for new roadways and construction in that community; whereas, during Edina's growth periods; archaeological awareness was not a consideration. Chair Carr observed that the new Three,Rivers bike,path has been approved to follow Nine Mile Creek through Edina, and she wondered if there; has been any consideration to evaluate the archaeology of the area as part of that project. Planner Repya explained that she was unsure what considerations have been made to the archaeology of the area. planned for the bike trail; however she would check into that with the City's Park Department and report back to the - oard. Member Davis asked Mr. Mather what archaeological periods the HPB would find most interesting'in Edina. Mr. Mather explained that there are two main branches: I st is the prehistoric period; however: those sites are very fragile and typically only found where there is undevelope& land to pursue research for that era. Thus the 2nd and most pertinent to Edina would be the historic archaeology dating from the 1850's to the 1950's — artifacts found during this period can give clues to daily life in the community, and provide, a connection and an involvement to the past. Mr. Mather added that there are very successful public archaeological programs which give the residents of a community an opportunity to get involved with discovering clues as to how previous residents in a community lived. Mr. Mather pointed out that Minnesota is fortunate to have funding opportunities available for archaeology projects through the Certified Local Government (CLG) program as well as the Legacy funds. He added that a first step would entail surveying the city to determine what areas would be most likely to provide archaeological significance; then an archaeologist would organize a dig — and if the public is involved, the archaeologist would serve as a coach to train community members interested in the project. Mr. Mather recalled that the City of Elk River did some important archaeological surveys in the late 1990's, and he, encouraged the HPB to check out that work as a good example. �w Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes- - - - -- . _ ._ ... - -- - - - - -- - - -- -- — - — - - -- December 11, 2012 A brief discussion ensued among the Board regarding potential areas of archaeological interest -in Edina - those included the original cite of the Grange Hall on the southeast corner of W. 50th Street and Wooddale Avenue; and the areas storied as potential Indian Mounds on the south side of W. 70th Street near Cornelia School, and the northwest area of Hwy 62 and Gleason Road. Planner Repya asked Mr. Mather what projects have been keeping him busy as of late. He responded that a project at Indian Mounds Park in St. Paul has been very interesting. They have found that using radar rather than digging up sensitive earth has provided very good results. The Board thanked Mr. Mather for attending their meeting and sharing how they can consider the archaeology of the community's past as part of their preservation planning. B. Edina History Presentation – As Taught in the Schools Planner Repya explained that when discussing the mission of educating the public about the City's history, the Board has wondered how involved the schools have been in portraying Edina's past. To demonstrate that the schools are doing a fine job of telling Edina's story, Ms. Repya shared a Power Point presentation created by teachers from Highlands Elementary School which did a very good job of teaching Edina's history in a very visual way. Ms. Repya also provided the Board with a copy of the most recent City map which now includes a listing of Edina's historic properties with a description of each on the back side. The Board expressed their delight in viewing the Edina History presentation, asking for a copy to share with others. The new City map was also well received. VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. Country Club District – COA Process Evaluation Board members reviewed the COA Evaluation form that Member Curran had perfected since the last meeting. All agreed that even though the form was a full page rather than a half page, the information included was important, and the form will be an excellent tool to use when evaluating COA applications. Planner Repya agreed to provide the Board with laminated copies of the form which they can keep for reference in their meeting packet envelopes. B. Properties Determined Eligible for Heritage Landmark Designation Planner Repya provided the Board with a packet of information that included a listing of the fifteen properties determined eligible for Heritage Landmark designation which included a property description, photograph and location map for each site. Also included was an explanation of the designation process. 3 Edina Heritage 13res —e anion Board u December 11, 2012 A Of the fifteen properties on the list there are seven private homes, the Morningside bungalows, two churches, four commercial properties, and one bridge (owned by the City). Ms. Repya pointed out that some of the property owners have been approached in the past regarding a potential heritage landmark designation, however they either did not respond or declined. Chair Carr commented that she found the information provided to be very helpful, adding that the HPB has identified in the 2013 Work Plan that at least two properties will be designated Heritage Landmark properties, and this baseline information is very important. Consultant Vogel pointed out that he would not recommend designating the churches individually, pointing out that a plan to study all of the churches in Edina has been identified for the future. Member Stegner suggested that an invitation to consider heritage landmark designation be sent to each of the property owners identified (with the exception of the churches). If a property owner declines, a new invitation could be sent when the property changes ownership. Member Moore pointed out that since 2013 is Edina's Quasquicentennial (I 25th Anniversary), the invitations for landmark designations could be an excellent marketing tool and a way to participate in the year -long celebration. Board Members agreed that tying the invitation into the anniversary celebration was an excellent idea. Member Moore offered to work with Planner Repya to produce an invitation package to send to the properties on the determined eligible list. The Board agreed that sending out the letters after the first of the year would be a great idea, and they looked forward to receiving a project update at the January 2013 meeting. No formal action was taken. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. Preservation Consultant's 2013 work Plan Consultant Vogel explained that his 2013 Work Plan includes the following activities: ) Advise city officials on all matters relating to heritage preservation, including the identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment of heritage resources. 2) Attend four (4) regular meetings of the Heritage Preservation Board at the direction of the City Planner. I have also agreed to be available for presentations to the Edina Planning Commission and the City Council as needed. 3) Review and comment on all Certificate of Appropriateness applications and work with city staff to ensure that heritage resources are considered in city planning for community development and public works. 4) Revise and update the city's heritage preservation resources inventory. 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes. December 11, 2012 5) Complete the reconnaissance -level survey of heritage resources in the West Minneapolis Heights /Mendelssohn neighborhood. 6) Initiate a reconnaissance -level survey of heritage resources in the White Oaks neighborhood. 7) Prepare Edina Heritage Landmark nomination studies for a minimum of two (2) properties previously determined eligible for local designation. 8) Provide the HPB and other city officials with information, education, and training in heritage preservation. Mr. Vogel pointed out that there are an additional eighteen projects.of interest the HPB has identified over the past few years, however there has not been the time and /or funds available to accomplish them. A brief discussion ensued regarding the Work Plan and additional projects. Board members agreed that they liked the Work Plan provided, however wanted more information on the eighteen additional projects listed. Member Davis suggested Vogel provide an explanation of each of the eighteen additional items, to include the list prioritized from most to least important. It was agreed that this information would be helpful. Mr. Vogel stated that he would provide the requested information for the Board. No formal action was taken. IX. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS None . a,, X. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Mellom commented that she was concerned about a house on Arden Avenue that replaced the siding with stone which she feels - detracts from -the homes historic integrity. Planner Repya-- responded that the Country Club District's plan of treatment does not require a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace the siding, roofing, trim, fascia, soffit, eave moldings, windows or doors. A COA is required for new structures (homes and detached garages) and additions to the home on a street facing fagade. Ms. Mellom pointed out that in her opinion, even though a COA may not have been required, changing the siding of the home to stone was wrong. Member Stegner commented that several weeks ago he shared an article with the HPB about the Jewish cemeteries in the Metro area. One of the cemeteries is located in Edina, north of Minnehaha Creek and east of France Avenue. The Board members agreed that the article was very interesting and expressed an interest in finding out more about the cemetery. Planner Repya agreed to find out what she could about the cemetery and include this item on the January 2013 HPB meeting agenda. Chair Carr advised the Board that televising the next HPB meeting on January 8, 2013 has been canceled because the City Council needs to use the Council Chambers for a special meeting. That being the case, the January 8th meeting will take place in the Community Room as usual. A date for televising a 2013 meeting will be coordinated with the Communications Department, and once scheduled, that date will be shared with the HPB. 5 Edina- Heritage_Preservafion_Board____ Minutes December 11, 2012 XI. STAFF COMMENTS None XII. NEXT MEETING DATE January 8, 2013 X111. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 p.m. Member Davis moved for adjournment at 9:00 p.m. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, ,Joyce R.epya A r� MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD HELD AT PUBLIC WORKS & PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY December 11, 2012 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. It. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Cella, Jones, Gieseke, Jacobson, Segreto, Steel Member Kathryn Peterson arrived at 7:03 pm Member O'Leary arrived at 7:05 pm Member Almog arrived at 7:07 pm Member Deeds arrived at 7:27 pm Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to have Item VI.B. Off -Road Cycling Trail Proposal — Braemar Park moved to be the first item on the agenda.. Ayes: Members Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Gieseke, Jacobson, Segreto, Cella, Jones, Deeds Motion Carried Member Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Jacobson to approve the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Gieseke, Jacobson, Segreto, Cella, Jones, Deeds Motion Carried IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of Monday, November 19, 2012 Ayes: Members Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Gieseke, Jacobson, Segreto, Cella, Jones, Deeds Motion Carried V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None Vt. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Off -Road Cycling Trail Proposal — Braemar Park Mr. Keprios commented that staff is looking for Park Board's approval in concept for this project. He stated if Park Board feels this is not an appropriate activity to study in concept without knowing anything from studies, he would propose it be tabled or voted down, if it is something you do not feel is worth studying. He noted that if members vote in favor of the project, it doesn't mean you are approving the project to move forward, but rather it means that you are approving to further study it. Mr. Keprios pointed out secondly he would like for the Park Board to help staff establish an appropriate process on how to go about future projects that are presented to staff because as staff they don't ti necessarily know what the Park Board is interested in seeing. He stated that from a staff standpoint they felt this might be worth looking at; it doesn't necessarily mean it is something that needs to be done. Mr. Keprios explained he does not know a whole lot about the sport and that he pretty much stole everything that was provided in the staff report from the proponents who are bringing this forward. He apologized to the Park Board if it sounds a little too salesmanship; he should have adjusted it. Mr. Keprios stated that the Park Board needs to do two things; first, discuss whether you think it's worth it in concept and secondly, what would be an appropriate process. If Park Board would like to move forward he thinks an appropriate notification is important but before.that they may want to do an environmental impact study. In addition, they may want to hire someone who is a professional at building these to tell them where it should go and what impact it will have on the land. Also, resident input is going to be absolutely critical. Richard Jahnke and Bruce Freeman informed the Park Board they have both lived in Edina all of their lives and this past summer they went to different mountain biking trails throughout the Twin Cities area. They explained they decided to walk through the woods and between the trees in Braemar and around the golf course and realized that there was some very nice terrain there that could have these bike paths. Their next step was they contacted Reed Smidt who works at the City of Woodbury in the Parks Department and who single- handedly got a trail going in Woodbury and also got a grant written. They stated their next 'step was to make a proposal to the Park Board. Mr. Freeman, commented that a lot of people don't know very much about mountain biking so they tried to put a lot of information together. There are people in the audience here that are experts in the field of designing and being involved in the sport. He noted that they really want to emphasize trying to be a good neighbor working together on this. Member Kathryn Peterson asked if there is a ballpark idea of what something like this would cost with the understanding there is not money in the budget for it. Reed Smidt, President of the Minnesota Off - Road Cyclists (MORC), indicated that he agrees with Mr. Keprios that they are looking to get a better evaluation and some more feedback on what the park holds as well as what the community is looking at for the residents. He stated before they get to that they need to make sure they have a good project and there are costs involved with that. Therefore, if you are looking for an evaluation or a study for the single track it varies but could go up to $2,500 depending on how extensive it gets. He pointed out the environmental side is important as well and�they want to be good stewards of the land so they will look at all factors and make sure it's the right fit for the community and organization as well. He noted that for a single track depending on the factors that are involved you can base it on square foot or mileage but it can range from $15,000 to $16,000 per mile but in comparison it's quite a bit lower than a paved path. Mr. Smdt explained there are grants available that they can look at, volunteer labor from local residents as well as MORC who will coordinate volunteers with the local communities that would bring that cost down even further. Member Gieseke asked what percentage of Twin Cities residents are off -road cyclers? Mr. Smidt replied that based on the greater population of the metro area he doesn't know. Member Segreto commented this would bring in a lot of people from outside of Edina to which Mr. Smidt replied it could potentially, yes. Mr. Keprios asked what kind of maintenance is typical for this kind of trail. Mr. Smidt responded MORC has trail crews at every trail and they have a trail session every week usually 2 to 2 % hours and they 2 look for issues and try to be ahead of the game as far as any problems that may come I up. He noted that usually it's just a general maintenance; clearing back the trail and trimming the maintenance of the trail. He stated that if the City wanted to work with MORC and establish a memorandum of understanding to determine what they could do and couldn't do; however, general trail work as far as just fixing things and trimming would all be done by volunteers. Mr. Jahnke informed the Park Board that Mr. Freeman and he are trying to organize an effort to try to get some volunteers. He indicated that there is a high school mountain biking league that started in the Twin Cities and Edina High School is thinking about starting a mountain biking league: Mr. Jahnke informed the Park Board that once the bikers enter the woods you don't know they are there and he doubts the golfers at Braemar would even see the people biking through there because the canopy is so dense. He noted that he thinks it would be an asset for the City of Edina for years to come and it's a fun, invigorating, good physical activity for people of all ages: Mr. Freeman stated that one of the things about this is you get a lot of community developing around biking who get attached to the land and really want to help with the upkeep of the trails. He noted that right now the area is being totally taken over with buckthorn as well as there are some old oaks that are dying off and there is literally no new growth going on there. He indicated that as far as the trail he would really like to do some buckthorn removal and this would be a good start to eliminate a lot of it. Mr. Smidt gave a power point presentation on the mountain biking trails. He noted they are just looking to get an evaluation and a cost estimate. Hopefully the city will then support the design and construction of a single track trail at Braemar. Chair Steel asked Mr. Keprios what his recommendation is to which he replied the Park Board needs to discuss and decide whether or not this is a concept worth studying. Chair Steel asked what a study would entail. Mr. Keprios stated he would think take some advice from these folks and find a professional trail developer and also thinks they will need to get the Watershed District involved. He indicated they need to find out what it's going to cost, and who is going to volunteer as well as find out where the trail would be best suited because there may be a better location for it within Edina. Chair Steel asked Mr. Keprios if he had any idea what the study would cost to which he replied he really doesn't but thinks it would be affordable enough if they were able to keep it under $15,000 because it could probably be absorbed in their operating budget. Member Jones asked if this is the only site in Edina that would be suitable for a mountain bike trail to which Mr. Freeman replied yes, the Braemar site is very unique in that it is not only big enough but it also has elevation which is important for a good design. Member Kathryn Peterson asked Mr. Keprios if they were to approve in concept would it be okay to say that mountain bike trails might be good at some point in the future but we are not going to do anything immediately. Mr. Keprios replied that would be Park Board's call, he doesn't see it as staff's role necessarily to say yes or no when someone approaches the city. Member Kathryn Peterson replied that it's on the agenda to which Mr. Keprios replied it's on the agenda to give them the venue from a staff's standpoint. He stated that he thinks their mission has always been to try to find a way to say "yes" and if it's not a fit, it's not a fit but at least allow people to have the opportunity to go through the process and be told yes or no rather than just stop at the first stop which is staff's desk. Chair Steel stated she does appreciate the opportunity to be involved in this project in a very early stage and she appreciates residents bringing their ideas forward. 3 Public Comment Earl Faulkner, 7619 Gleason Rd., addressed the Park Board in opposition. Ben Masnado, 6327 Valley View, addressed the Park Board in favor. Tom & Kevin Delaney, 5717 Grove Street, addressed the Park Board in favor. Tim Wegner, not.an Edina resident but a professional trail builder. Member Deeds asked if the trails could be designed to be multiple use trails so they could also be used for cross country skiing. Mr. Wegner replied they do snowshoe on a lot of their winter mountain bike trails which is a wonderful outdoor winter activity. He added the mountain bikers really like it when people snow shoe on the trails because it packs it so they are able to ride on it with their fat tire wheel bikes. Gary Bartolett, 7421 Gleason, addressed the Park Board in opposition. Tom Wagner, 6004 Bonnie Brae Drive, addressed the Park Board in opposition. Raymond O'Connell, 4612 Valley View, addressed the Park Board in opposition. Carl Maijer, 6005 Bonnie Brae Drive, addressed the Park Board in opposition. Jill Faulkner, 7619 Gleason, addressed the Park Board in opposition. Barbara Kennedy, 7631 Gleason, addressed the Park Board in opposition. Jim McNulty, 6001 Bonnie Brae Drive, addressed the Park Board in opposition. Ken Horns, 5721 Grove St., stated he doesn't have any details but he knows that the Braemar clubhouse could use more business and would encourage the Park Board to take time and study this issue and try to understand more the costs and benefits of developing or not developing a bike trail before making a decision. Jennifer Collins, 7500 Hyde Park Drive, addressed the Park Board in- opposition. Dianne Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Ct., addressed the Park Board in opposition and added that she is also against the procedure. Kevin ? ? ? ? ?, 8300 W. 93`d St., addressed the Park Board in favor. Member Segreto commented she was kind of shocked to see this on the agenda and stated she walks those trails almost every day as well as snowshoes and cross country skis so it's a sensitive area and it's a wildlife habitat. She added this is the only place in Edina that is wild and it really worries her and she doesn't even want to study it. Member Kathryn Peterson commented that in addition to the concern about preserving the habitat is that significant portions of it are directly adjacent to residential areas and there is only a small section between the golf dome and arena that she would even consider studying. 4 Chair Steel indicated she is struggling with this item because they don't have the money to study this, it's not on their work plan and they really need a process for residents who have great ideas to bring them forward; however, they can't play favorites. She commented just because some are brought forward at certain times they really need to look at the Parks Department much more strategically and decide what their priorities are. What do residents really want and what things haven't they thought of that are also out there; therefore, she would like to talk more about process than the actual merits of this particular project. Member Deeds indicated he has a couple of important points and potentially three if they are going to talk process. He stated they have no mountain bike trails in Edina and it is a rapidly growing sport, is a great sport for exercise and is also a good sport for kids. The second thing is finding the right location and are there other locations because he is a little skeptical given the natural habitat that they are talking about and the current uses, etc. He stated that he does think there is a valid point in that mountain biking is a good sport, although he doesn't necessarily agree that Braemar is the place to do it, but the overall lack of having any place. for kids to do mountain biking is something they need looked at. When they looked at their surveys and other things that come back this was the kind of usage that ranked highly in the surveys of the residents. He stated as far as the need for mountain bike trails he absolutely agrees they need to think about this and there may not be a place to do it but they haven't looked at it. Member Deeds asked if it would be possible to incorporate mountain bike trails in the Nine Mile Trail plan. Mr. Keprios responded there is a well hidden mountain bike trail that does exist already that goes near where the Nine Mile Trail was going to go and every so many years they need to get permission from the railroad to go down there and knock it down because it's a little too aggressive. He added if you look on YouTube you will find it. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he learned today that this past weekend when the City Council had a work session and discussed the work plan for the coming year, including the Capital Improvement Plan, they decided they would like to earmark $65,000 to do what they call a "strategic plan" for what is needed in the parks. He suggested the Park Board's reaction to that is include mountain biking as part of that strategic study and maybe Braemar is a good site. He doesn't know if there is a section along that Nine Mile route, there may or may not be one. Member O'Leary stated he definitely thinks the idea of bringing mountain biking to Edina is a really good idea and is something he and his friends would do all of the time if there was one in Edina. It would be great activity for families and is just another great activity for people to do; therefore, he thinks they should look into it and would be very disappointed if they put a fork in it tonight because he thinks it deserves some study. Member Almog indicated that she agrees with what Member O'Leary said but is hearing that we don't have the money to afford to look into this in our budget at this point and asked what they can do. Mr. Keprios responded he thinks there are a couple of options. First, they should consider using the Strategic Plan money that is coming their way to study the issue. He stated that he does think they have enough in their 2013 operating budget to rely on $10,000 to $15,000 and added that it's discretionary money that can be used for various unforeseen things so there are some dollars. Member Almog noted that the biggest thing from the comments that were made tonight regarding this type of project would be the impact on the environment because that sounds like the biggest concern. Member Deeds commented he would recommend incorporating it into one of those points of a larger use plan. He noted this particular proposal is a long ways down that road and he would like to look at the potential for other sites and just the potential for mountain bike trails within Edina given how little space they take. He added the potential to run them to a lot of different areas is pretty broad so incorporate that within a broader strategic plan. 5 V Chair Steel commented that she is comfortable moving forward with the strategic plan that looks at everything and really gathers information from what residents want and tries to generate those new ideas. What is it we are lacking, not just mountain biking, and,then laying them side by side and say what makes this good for Edina and what can we succeed in, what fits within our parks system. Member Cella stated she shares the whole issue of process and when something is thrown in their lap because people are excited about it and say we should move it to the top of the priority list and maybe they can find $15,000 in the operating fund process to her it says that $15,000 could have been used for a project that was already at the top of their.priority.list that they are not. doing. She commented not to say that mountain biking might be a very good thing for this community to look at but we have a process that we go through to evaluate things and put them in the order that they are: Therefore, she is a little uncomfortable moving certain items around just because people have a lot of excitement about something right at this moment. She stated she does agree that if the City Council had said they have some money that they will set aside to do a strategic study of what it is we do need in Edina and where we should be putting our resources that certainly this idea should be part of that strategic study. It may not be that Braemar Park is where it should be but there may be some other places; she can't see leap frogging it over other things that they've already prioritized and don't have the money for. Chair Steel commented if they are doing a strategic study and spending money on it then why are they spending money on a little offshoot interest study. Member Gieseke replied he agrees and would be uncomfortable advancing this. 'He added that they talked about the process a couple of meetings ago and thinks they should stick to that. He noted that he thinks there is some merit to this project; however, he doesn't like the area they are proposing to put it and right now they don't even know if there is a demand for it in Edina. They are not even familiar enough with that to make a decision to go forward; however, he does like the idea of incorporating it into the strategic plan. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Jones, to table the specific proposal in front of them and authorize in their strategic planning process an investigation into the demand and potential location of mountain bike trails in the City of Edina. Ayes: Members Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Gieseke, Jacobson, Segreto, Cella, Jones, Deeds Motion Carried VI.B. Revised Master Plan — Countryside Park. Mr. Keprios introduced Gabriel Grinde from Hoisington who has been very involved in the development of the master plan and Jim Wilson from SGN Wendell who was involved with the newest shelter buildings. Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that this is a project that has had a lot of input from the community since it first started in 2007. He noted they had a very comprehensive input process in 2008 and it has evolved in time. He added that they gathered from the neighborhood the amenities they wanted in the park as well as how they thought it would be best laid out. He indicated that it has changed only slightly since then for a number of reasons that Ms. Grinde went through. Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks they did a good job of listening to the neighborhood all along. He informed the Park Board because they now have the money in the Developer's Fund to finally move forward they are now ready to show the proposed master plan. He stated that he would like to have Park Board's review and comment to see if there is anything they feel is missing, does not line up right or have questions. They are hoping to show it to the neighborhood on Friday if everything is in sync on the Park Board they will move on for City Council's approval before they go out and start soliciting bids. Member Deeds indicated they are short on multi - purpose fields in Edina and there are none in the plan to which Mr. Keprios replied he doesn't know that one could fit diagonally. Member Deeds asked if 6 some adaptations could be made to the plan for at least some of the younger kids with shorter fields in soccer and in lacrosse. Mr. Keprios replied he is not sure they have the distance for it as well as these are going to be heavily scheduled baseball fields and with multiple age groups using them they will be played on even more so it would be tough. Mr. Keprios indicated that the recta ngular,athletic field topic was discussed as far as part of the planning process where they brought in the athletic groups and the neighbors and both the neighbors and the EBA said no, they can't afford to lose those two fields; they are critical to the program and therefore it was a conscious decision made back then. Mr. Keprios pointed out that one thing that has been added to this plan since the neighbors as a whole got together in 2008 is the pathway that's through the park. He explained at the beginning the neighbors stated they did not need a pathway because Bredesen Park is just down the way; however, with the Waters Development moving into the area the demographics are changing and there are going to be a lot of seniors. Therefore, they felt it was a very important amenity for the park and it brings a hard accessible safe surface to the park provides a wonderful recreation opportunity especially for the elderly. He noted perhaps in the future what can be added is a soft surface trail coming off of the paved loop to a little boardwalk overlooking the wetland area. Member Kathryn Peterson recommended there be consideration for taller than average fencing along the left field line of the prep field and the right field line of the little league field such that people walking north won't get hit by foul balls. Member Jones stated that in the master plan she would like to see a pedestrian and bike path both going into the park and in the park and therefore would like to see planning for those be included. Member Cella commented who uses the playground because if someone has small children and is watching a little league game there is no way she would let her other kids go all the way over to the playground by themselves and as a parent feels you are not going to be able to use them both at the same time. She stated she doesn't know how many of the people who are using the park are just coming for the playground or are they using the playground while they are doing other things. Member Jones commented because they are experiencing global warming and the temperatures are rising there are fewer and fewer days for ice and if they are investing $400,000 to build this building she doesn't know if she feels comfortable. doing that anymore. Mr. Keprios responded it was discussed at length in the neighborhood process and the number one thing they wanted back in their park was a hockey rink with lights and a building. Member Deeds asked if it would make more sense to put the bathrooms where the, dugouts are or in that general area instead of diagonally across the entire park from the baseball fields. Ms. Grinde replied that is a really tight area. Mr. Keprios responded it's not a lot different from what they have at Pamela, Garden, Weber, etc. They cannot always have them immediately next to every athletic field. Member O'Leary asked if they've thought about putting in some port -a- potties to which Member Kathryn Peterson replied that usually the neighbors aren't real wild about port-a- potties. Mr. Wilson went through a power point presentation on the design of the proposed shelter building. Member Jacobson asked if there are any means to enable concession stand capabilities for games. Mr. Keprios responded that wasn't on the radar screen but that isn't to say a concession couldn't be a mobile unit or perhaps have some small packaged items sold from the office. 7 Member Kathryn Peterson noted that she would challenge the City to find a contractor who is hungry enough to build this for less than $400,000 because that seems like a lot of money. Mr. Wilson responded that includes utilities for $50,000 as well as lighting for the rink, updated sewer and water connections, hydrant, etc. Member Cella commented as she recalls at the last meeting $330,000 was in the budget for Countryside Park and that is what was approved. Mr. Keprios responded that was just for Phase I, they weren't certain the Waters Development was going to go forward at that point so they wanted to at least get Phase I started which included pathways and the playground. Member Deeds stated that if they are going to do this it needs to be promoted as more than just a neighborhood park because there is a lot going on and there is a lot of money going into this. Therefore, in order for this investment to make any kind of sense it has to be viewed and seen and promoted as a city wide asset and resource versus simply being a neighborhood park. He indicated the neighborhoods are very territorial about the parks and that is a lot of money going into one park if it's just going to be a neighborhood park. Mr.'Keprios responded that it has functioned like that in the past with the hockey rink and permanent building so people travel from around Edina to use that park and the neighbors are okay with that. He indicated that he thinks this park is going to go from an underutilized park to a destination park and people are going to find this to be one of their more favorite playgrounds and they are going to want to use that shelter building. Member Jones stated that she would like to clarify-why they started down this path of going to this neighborhood and doing a master plan as opposed to any other neighborhood in Edina. She is trying to figure out how it happened so that Countryside Park is getting one million dollars in renovations while other parks aren't getting any money this year. Mr. Keprios explained when it was decided they needed to scale back the rinks at Countryside Park were taken out. As time went on the neighbors came forward and said they need a hockey rink and so before they jumped in to rebuild it they decided that it really needed to be placed in a north /south orientation which also meant it didn't make sense to keep the building where it was. It sort of took on a life of its own and a lot of it was just the neighborhood input in order to respond and react to that. He pointed out that the Waters Development and City Council made it very clear that the money should go to that park. Member Jones asked Mr. Keprios if he is saying that in the future when there are other developments that the money will go to the closest park available. Mr. Keprios replied hopefully through the strategic planning process the Park Board will have that figured out years ahead of time. Member Jones stated that she wants to make sure this is not precedent setting and asked if any Park Board members feel that the closest park to any development should get all of that. Member Deeds replied no and that they've discussed this before there is not a well - developed process, it is a haphazard process which they saw last month with people wanting to rebuild a playground with their own $100,000. He stated he agrees this is not precedent setting and that there are issues in all of this with appropriate priorities, equity issues and other things that have to be wrestled with by staff, City Council, and the Park Board and hopefully it is something they will get to. Mr. Keprios replied there are quite a few things that do happen that are out of our control. VI.C. Edible Playground Proposal — Lewis Park Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board this is an item that was not on the long range or short range radar screen but is one that came to him from his own staff, Kristin Aarsvold, which he would like to give kudos for doing. The idea came from Eden Prairie where it has been extremely successful. It is a creative idea that is going to cost the city very little and funding will be secured from other sources to make this happen. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason it is before the Park Board is because it does displace the use of a park where there currently is some open green space and because this is a different use of an existing park. He commented even though it is small in nature it is something he would really like the Park Board to weigh in on. In addition, he feels they should notify the neighbors and the athletic associations if this is something they are considering at Lewis Park. Kristin Aarsvold, Recreation Supervisor, explained to the Park Board that Eden Prairie received some grant money to create an edible playground. Ms. Aarsvold indicated that as a representative from the department who sits on the "Statewide Health Improvement Program" (SHIP) which includes representatives from Bloomington, Richfield arid Edina. It is part of their mission to improve food quality and improve access. One of the things that came out of SHIP was the farmer's market at Centennial Lakes. She informed the Park Board that Lewis Park is an area where they have some changing demographics and due to some Section 8 housing there are some lower income and socioeconomic issues. In addition, there are not a lot of great places to go for fresh fruit and vegetables and so the concept comes mainly from her belief that kids don't necessarily understand how food fuels your body for being physically active and she would like to help kids understand lifelong leisure skills such as gardening is exercise. She noted her proposal talks about the obesity epidemic and it talks about the census track information she received from the Edina Resource Center. She noted the Edina Resource Center were the first people who came on board with her and the shared history they had in serving the underserved families in Edina. She stated that she knows they were able to receive a grant from Blue Cross Blue Shield and maybe they could earmark $1,000 for the project. Ms. Aarsvold indicated this would be a pilot program and she would have an evaluation process with a pre- season evaluation and a post- season evaluation for all of the kids who participate in the program. She explained that participants who would gain benefit from the garden would be the playground participants from the playground program at Lewis Park. This program is for 6 to 10 year -olds to which they average 38 kids throughout the summer and added that the impact goes wider than that because it goes back to the parents and younger siblings. Ms. Aarsvold commented that they currently provide grant -in -aid for kids who cannot afford their program. Ms. Aarsvold pointed out they also have a neat partnership with DOW Water Process Solutions who over the years have donated a lot such as recycling containers in their parks to building bird houses and planting areas at other parks. She indicated that every year they come to them with a "Keep America Beautiful" initiative and after talking with them they have pledged support in helping to build the garden. Ms. Aarsvold indicated that she is looking at getting her funding secured by March and begin construction. She informed the Park Board that she also just learned that the Fairview Southdale Foundation has granted them $5,000 as well as the Bloomington Public Health has some money that they are willing to earmark for this program in the form of $2,500. Therefore, it should only cost their department approximately $1,500 to make this happen in Lewis Park. Ms. Aarsvold pointed out that she has also talked with Bob Prestrud, Park Foreman, who is very excited about this and noted that they could tie it into the irrigation system that is there so the gardens could be watered on weekends and /or off days. Member Deeds stated that this is a no brainer, it's a great idea. Chair Steel asked Mr. Keprios to clarify what his recommendation is. Mr. Keprios replied it would be to send notification to the neighbors within 1,000 feet and ask for their input via email, fax or mail but that it has to be in writing. Once you have received input set up a meeting for this to appear on the agenda and allow for public input and then make your decision at the end of the meeting. Member Deeds asked what is being displaced to which Ms. Aarsvold replied open space, it's a 20 x 30 plat, very small, fully accessible and gravel based as well as there will be a garden shed with a lock. Member Segreto asked if it will be handicapped accessible to which Ms. Aarsvold replied yes. Member Segreto asked about pesticide use to which Ms. Aarsvold replied it will be fully organic. Member Segreto asked what about critters coming;in and eating the produce to which Ms. Aarsvold replied they do have a fence that should help. She also explained that they do have some great natural ideas to also try to.keep out different things. She stated that in her mind the process is more important than the product. Member Segreto commented that with the diversity in that area there are a lot of different food cultures coming from all over the world and it would be a really nice place to have some of the cultures get involved so it would be nice to see something other than tomatoes growing. Ms. Aarsvold pointed out that the concept used in Eden Prairie is they had a salsa garden, a pizza garden, lettuce and herbs, etc. She added they will enlist the help of the families that they work with and ask what they would like to plant. The process is going to be organic and it's a pilot project so who knows what will come of it. Member Almog suggested if they are looking for volunteers that it may be a great May Term project for any seniors that may be interested. Member Jones asked who would be the person responsible for this area, who would be maintaining it and what is the plan -for the non = growing season.- Ms: Aarsvold replied basically the park staff they could use some of their DOW volunteers as well as students who are signed up for the summer program to plant in the spring. During the summer they pretty much have kids on site four days a week along with their site leaders and playground leaders. She noted that she will also be making sure that things are being tended to, etc. Ms. Aarsvold indicated that starting in August they will run three camps with a contracted group to which their curriculum is similar to "Ll of M Simply Healthy Eating ". She indicated that DOW has offered their support at the end of the season to kind of put the garden to bed but that there be a big harvest dinner with all of the people who have been involved during the season to which the garden will then be dormant for the rest of the season. Member Jones asked if there will be any evening opportunities because a lot of people work and can't leave their children home during the day. Ms. Aarsvold replied that is something she has not thought about but is a unique concept that she will look into and see if maybe they could offer it as a family activity two nights a week or something. Member Jones asked if there is a playground program at Yorktown Park to which Ms. Aarsvold replied no because there is no building at Yorktown Park which is what they need for their playground programs. Member Jones explained that there are community gardens being proposed by Do Town at Yorktown Park, which has not yet been discussed with the Park Board, and wondered if they should be putting this in a neighborhood park and would it make more sense to put by the proposed community garden. Ms. Aarsvold replied that DOW came on board as a local business and they are really excited and one of the reasons why is because it's basically in their backyard and they are enlisting their wellness committee to be a big part of this as well as a lot of their employees use the park. She stated that when she approached them about trying something at Cornelia School Park they said no. Ms. Aarsvold indicated that she did talk to someone from the Garden Council about having some members come out once or twice to talk about gardening as a hobby. Dianne Plunkett Latham, member of the Edina Garden Council, informed the Park Board they have a sprouts group for youth and twice a year they have activities and if you are interested you could get the word out to your 10 people and maybe have one big group. She commented that she understands the program doesn't start until June 16`h and their sprouts group normally starts in April but maybe they could use the City Greenhouse to start the plants and the participants could bring them home and germinate them on their windowsills and then they could be planted on June 16`h at the edible garden and that is one thing you could tie it into. She noted that they are also trying to teach their youth about native plants and at the Edina Art Center they have a buckthorn abatement aka habitat restoration. Ms. Aarsvold replied that she would be very interested in having some kind of partnership. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to approve the notification of the neighbors. Ayes: Members Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Gieseke, Jacobson, Segreto, Cella, Jones, Deeds Motion Carried V11. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board he has forward all emails to date to the Park Board. Vlll. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None IX. STAFF COMMENTS None X. RECOGNITION OFJOHN KEPRIOS' YEARS OF SERVICE Chair Steel presented John Keprios with a plaque that stated "Distinguished Service the Edina Park Board congratulates John Keprios on his 35 year career with the City of Edina and thanks him for his dedicated service as staff liaison ". The Park Board again thanked Mr. Keprios for all of his years of service. Mr. Keprios thanked the Park Board for all of their hard work and that it has been really rewarding in so many ways. There are a lot of things he is very proud of and there are some things that he wishes he would have done different and hopefully he can pass those on to Ms. Kattreh so she doesn't make the same mistakes. He stated that what he is going to cherish the most are all of the people; everybody he works as well as the people he gets to serve with on a volunteer basis and the community. He wished everyone the best and noted that he is leaving everyone in great hands with Ms. Kattreh. Meeting adjourned at 9:48 pm. 11 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DECEMBER 12,201-2 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair,Grabiel called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Forrest, Schroeder, Kilberg, Potts, Platteter, Cherkassky, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer, Grabiel. Absent from the roll: Scherer III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meeting Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. APPROVAL:OF CONSENT AGENDA. The minutes of the November 28, 2012, meeting was filed as submitted. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Lot Division. Matt and Mike Knodt, 3928 49th Street West, Edina, MN Planner Presentation. Planner Teague informed the Commission Matt & Mike Knodt are proposing to split their existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separation of a double - dwelling at 3928 49t. h Street West. The double dwelling on this property is currently under construction, and has been built with a fire rated wall separating the two units. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. Within the block of 49th Street West, there are a mixture of duplexes and single - family homes, zoned both R -1, Single - Family Residential and R -2, Double- Dwelling Unit. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the city council approve the lot division as requested. Appearing for the Applicant Mike Knodt, Property Owner Chair Grabiel asked if anyone would like to speak to this issue; being none Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Carpenter stated this request is similar to past approvals of party wall lot divisions and moved lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Variance. Nicole Sundberg. 5801 Crescent Terrace, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is located south Of Crescent Terrace consisting of a one story rambler with an attached 2 car garage that was built in 1953. The applicant is planning to tear -down the existing home and replace it with a two story Mediterranean style home with an attached 4 car garage. The new home will conform to all of the ordinance requirements with the exception of the required front yard setback from Crescent Terrace. The ordinance requires that any new home or addition to an existing home maintain the average front yard setback of the adjacent homes on either side. The home adjacent to the west located at 33 Crescent Terrace is 82.3 feet from their front lot line. The adjacent home to the south located at 4904 Rolling Green Parkway provides a front yard setback of 73.2 feet. The required average front yard setback of the adjacent two homes establishing the front yard setback for the proposed _home is 77.75 feet. The existing home is nonconforming and is located 2 51.9 from Crescent Terrace right -of -way. The new home is proposed to match the nonconforming 51.9 foot front yard setback of the existing home. The lot is large, triangular in shape with much of the lot area part of the front yard. The purpose of the average front yard setback requirement is to maintain adequate spacing from the street and maintain continuity along a developed street scape. This rule is most important when the lots are narrow and set in a traditional lot and block pattern. The Rolling Green neighborhood is made up of angled streets and large estate lots and is not at all like a traditional street with rectangular lots within rectangular blocks. The character of the neighborhood includes large homes that are proportionate to the ample lot areas which are oriented towards views, topography and street presence. The proposed home has been designed to conform with all of the other zoning requirements including height,setback and coverage. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: 1. With the exception of-the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District. 2. The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as the proposed home will uphold the established front setback pattern already existing on the block. b. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as the proposed home will uphold the established front setback pattern already existing on the block. c. The practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance include the triangular- shape- ofthe -lot and- resulting•amount °of,front yard that must be maintained given the required setback and the imposition of a deeper front yard setback given that the lot has always had a home located closer to the street than the neighboring properties. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance in terms of house location, mass and over -all height with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Survey date stamped: November 29, 20.12 Building plans/ elevations date stamped: November 28, 2012. Appearing for the Applicant Nicole and Jeff Sundberg, applicants and Nate Wissink, Streeter & Assoc. 3 Applicant Presentation Nate Wissink addressed the Commission and with the aid of graphics noted for the Commission the reasoning behind the proposed house location. Wissink indicated that their goal was to promote the best location for the new house for the following reasons: 1. By maintaining the front street setback established by the existing house greater opportunity was provided to achieve a larger rear yard area. This house placement is also less injurious to the property to the south by providing a deeper setback from the common property line. 2. When taking the adjacent houses into consideration it was found that the adjacent houses have buildable lot areas of 48 %. The subject lot has a buildable area of 30% which creates practical difficulties in building placement. Continuing, Wissink presented photos of existing houses in the neighborhood pointing out the diversity of those houses ranging from ramblers to two story homes and the rolling topography of the area. Concluding, Wissink reported that he had spoken with a number of neighbors about the proposal. Chair Grabiel opened the public hearing and asked if anyone would like to speak to the issue. Public Comment The following spoke in opposition to the requested variance: Marcus Mollison, Lindquist & Vennum was present representing the following residents: Baker — 4904 Rolling Green Parkway, Edina, MN; Broat — 4820 Rolling Green Parkway, Edina, MN; Gilligan — 5804 Crescent Terrace, Edina, MN; Ramsay - 33 Crescent Terrace, Edina, MN: Gravier -4909 Bywood West, Edina, MN Suzanne Knelman — 4812 Rolling Green Parkway, Edina, MN Phil Broat — 4820 Rolling Green Parkway, Edina, MN Donna Ramsay — 33 Crescent Terrace, Edina, MN Patty Gilligan — 5804 Crescent Terrace, Edina, MN Comments focused on the size of the proposed house including its style and height as a two -story home vs. the present one -story ranch style home. Change in streetscape and the potential loss of views would also negatively impact surrounding properties. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Potts moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 4 Discussion In response to comments from neighbors Mr. Wissink introduced Andrea Swan, architect for the project. Swan reported she was careful with the design of the new house adding much thought went.into the placement of the house and its design elements. Swan acknowledged the house as proposed is two story; however, the "height" is centered in the middle... The areas of the house that abuts the two neighboring properties are one - story. Continuing, Wissink clarified that the actual building height is 32:9 -feet and the house to the south is two feet lower. Wissink also noted that to promote privacy additional landscaping would be added to the existing landscaping between the subject property and the Ramsay property. Chair Grabiel asked Planner Aaker to respond to a comment from a resident that asked if Planning Staff visited the subject site before writing the staff report. Planner Aake'r responded in the affirmative; staff visits the site. Commissioner Fischer referred to the front yard setback of a house on Bywood West and questioned if the front yard setbacks in this neighborhood varies every few houses. Planner Aaker responded that in this neighborhood front yard setbacks vary adding that the City ordinance regulating front yard setbacks in "established" neighborhoods is the same throughout the City. Continuing, Aaker explained that in an "established" neighborhood the front yard setback is now determined by averaging the homes on either side. Aaker reiterated in Rolling Green front yard setbacks vary and are a "mixed bag ". Fischer commented that it's been his experience that corner lots have the tendency to require variances for additions or redevelopment. Aaker agreed with that statement. Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Aaker if staff calculated the building height of the adjacent houses. Planner Aaker responded she did not calculate the height of the adjacent homes. Commissioner Staunton said he understands how staff formulated the required setback for the new home at 77.75 -feet by averaging the setbacks of the houses on either side; noting this leaves a "building area" of roughly 12;000 plus square feet. Continuing, Staunton asked Planner Aaker if she knows the lot coverage for the adjacent lots.. Aaker responded that in:this neighborhood (including the subject lot)-Jot coverage isn't an issue due to the size of the lots,,adding she did not calculate lot coverage for the adjoining lots. Aaker concluded to clarify lot coverage requirements that lot coverage doesn't include driveways, sidewalks, swimming pools and the required pool decking, etc. M Motion Commissioner Potts said he appreciates all comments from neighbors and given the nature of this street and the size and shape of the lot he appreciates the design submitted. Potts said in his opinion the house as presented maintains the character of the neighborhood, adding he agrees with staff's observations. Commissioner Potts moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder asked Planner Teague to review the variance requirements for practical difficulties. Planner Teague responded that a variance will relieve practical difficulties that prevent reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Continuing, Teague said reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show that the land can't be put to any reasonable use; rather they must show there are practical difficulties in complying with the Code. Teague said "practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Concluding; Teague stated in looking at what's reasonable for this site and given the practical difficulties from the curve in the road and the setback imposed by the adjacent homes staff felt that moving the proposed house farther forward on the lot would reduce impact to the home to the south and that the proposed house maintained the character of Rolling Green. Commissioner Staunton stated he supports the variance request as presented adding he was persuaded by the location of the old house. Staunton commented that much of the objection to the new house appears to be with its mass. Staunton concluded he understands the concerns of neighbors; however, believes "breathing room" is maintained. Commissioner Forrest said her initial reaction was to support the variance acknowledging the shape of the lot is unique. After further consideration Forrest noted that the buildable area on this lot is generous and in her opinion it's not unreasonable for the neighbors to want-to see the neighborhood character protected through City ordinances. Forrest reiterated there appears to be enough space to work with to lessen the impact of the new house. Forrest also noted that this design appears to contain additional impervious surface, adding that changes the character of the lot too. Commissioner Fischer observed that the house to the south has a lesser setback than the proposed house and enjoys that setback. He noted many residents living in the City's smaller lot neighborhoods would say "wow" to someone having a building area of 12 thousand + square feet; however, this isn't most neighborhoods or most Edina lots 0 this is Rolling Green where the majority of lots are large in comparison. Fischer added the lot configuration and the curve and layout of the road in his opinionwere not self - created. He said the, house that's there today isn't a small house, it's a one -story house; however, its presence is noticeable when driving this block. Fischer said in the scope of what's happening in Rolling Green in his opinion the character of Rolling Green wouldn't be negatively impacted because of this request. He acknowledged at the end of the day this will be a change but this change shouldn't alter the character. of the Rolling Green neighborhood. Chair Grabiel stated in his opinion it could be considered unreasonable to build a house without a 'back yard ", adding having a back yard is reasonable. He also noted with regard to the neighborhood that the aerial indicates a number of the homes have swimming pools and other outdoor amenities. Commissioner Staunton questioned if this lot is being penalized because of its triangular shape and curve in road. He noted if the lot was more "squared" off there may not be a variance issue. He noted the proposed house appears to be squared to the corner. Chair Grabiel called for the vote: Ayes; Schroeder, Platteter, Potts, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer. Grabiel. Nays; Forrest. Motion carried. C. Variance. Doug and Pat Vayda. 5201 Wooddale Avenue, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the subject property is a corner lot located south of west 52nd Street and east of Wooddale Ave. and is owned by Doug and Pat Vayda. It consists of a one and one half story home built in 1935 with an attached garage that loads from west 52nd Street. The home was built in the north east corner of the site with the garage and portions of the home within the 25 foot rear yard setback and the garage within the 20 foot setback required from the side street. Planner Aaker explained that while the garage may look like a two car garage, the interior space measures 16' -10" x 17'_ 11" and is not considered large enough to be a two car garage. The existing garage is located a little over 19 feet from the side street lot line and 6 inches from the rear lot line. No variance is required from the rear lot line because they will maintain the existing nonconforming rear setback and will not add more than 200 square feet into the setback area as allowed by the nonconforming addition section of the city code. The ordinance requires a minimum 20 foot setback for a garage opening facing the street, so the existing garage is currently nonconforming at a little over 19 7 feet from the lot Iine.The owners would like to decrease the setback from the north lot line to be approximately 15 feet from the north lot line. The adjacent home to the east has their garage front setback approximately 6'— 8' from their the north lot'line, or roughly 11 -13 feet closer to the street than the subject's existing garage or 9 feet closer to the north lot line than the proposed garage extension. It should be noted that given the boulevard area, the new garage front will still be approximetly 26'— 9" from the street edge of 52 "d Street.. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it alters conditions on the property only slightly and keeps the garage addition farther from the street than the setback provided by the neighbor's garage to the east. The conditions on the property are not self- imposed and are a challenge when trying to maintain and improve the existing structure. 3) The practical difficulty imposed by the setback and the nonconforming garage location limits design opportunity. The intent of the ordinance is to provide adequate spacing between garage openings and the street. The proposed garage opening will be farther from west 52 'd than the neighbor's garage and will still be 26'— 9" from the street edge. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans; unless modified by the conditions below: Survey date stamped January 4, 2011. Building plans and elevations date stamped November 28, 2012. Appearing for the Applicant Doug and Pat Vayda, Jean ReKamp Larson, Architect Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked for clarification on the use of the garage at this time. Planner Aaker responded that the applicants are not living in the house at this time. M Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Aaker the dimensions of the existing garage. Planner Aaker reported the interior measurement of the existing garage is 16'10" X 1711 ". Applicant Presentation Jean ReKamp Larsen addressed the Commission and said their goal was to do a sensitive addition maintaining the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Vayda reiterated ReKamp Larsen's comment of their commitment to maintain neighborhood character and the character of the house. Mr. Vayda said he purchased the house from the original owner, adding the house needed some updating. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone was present to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Fischer commented that the change is minimal bad he supports the variance as submitted. Commissioner Forrest said she likes the sustainability of the project. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions Commissioner - Platteter,seconded the motion. All-voted aye; motion carried. D. Preliminary Plat. Franklin and Carol Sidell. 4232 Oakdale Avenue and 4412 Morningside Road, Edina, MN. I . Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Peter Knaeble on behalf of Frank Sidell is proposing to subdivide the Sidell family -owned property located in between Littel Street and Morningside Road into eight lots. Currently the site consists of six lots. The existing home on the south side of the property and various accessory buildings would be torn down and a cul -de -sac street would be built along the east lot line to serve six of the new home sites. The existing home at 4232 Oakdale would remain and one new lot_ created on Little Street. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; L'9 2. Lot depth variances from 161 feet to 131 feet for Lot 4; to 140 feet for Lot 6 and to 135 feet for Lot 7. Teague reported within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 9,606 square feet, median lot depth is 161 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. Continuing, Teague explained that the applicant has developed a plat that would meet all of the minimum lot size requirements; therefore, this site is entitled to develop with eight lots. However, the applicant would rather not develop the site with that plan. There are some steep slopes on this property as well as very mature trees. By developing the site in' that configuration with a through street to connect Morningside Road to Littel Street would require extensive tree removal and slop disturbance. Therefore, the applicant is proposing the cul -de -sac configuration to avoid the slope; and is proposing a permanent conservation easement over some of the mature trees to ensure they are protected. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that.the City Council approve the proposed eight lot subdivision of the Sidell property and the lot depth variances from 161 feet to 131 feet for Lot 4; to 140 feet for Lot 6; and to 135 feet for Lot 7 based on the following findings: 1. The applicant has submitted a subdivision of the property that would meet all minimum zoning district requirements with eight. lots and new through street that would connect Morningside Road and Littel Street. 2. Rather than develop the site per all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements, the applicant has submitted a proposed subdivision of the property with a cul- de -sac, which requires lot depth variances for Lots 4, 6 and 7. 3. The proposed subdivision with the three lot depth variances would preserve the steep slopes on the site, and permanently preserves 82 mature trees by placing them in a conservation easement. 4. The proposed subdivision still has eight lots. 5. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 6. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing steep slopes and mature trees on the property. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lots larger in size than the median, and there are 26 lots within 500 feet of the property that do not have lot depths greater than 131 feet, which is the shallowest of the three lots that require lot depth variances. C. The variance request is reasonable, as subdivision still contains eight lots, which would be allowed with the Code compliant subdivision; however, it permanently protects steep slopes and 82 mature trees. 10 d. If the variances were denied, the applicant could still subdivide the property into eight lots, however the steep slopes would be disturbed an additional 42 mature trees would be removed. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to release of the final plat, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. . b. Enter into a Developers Agreement with the City. The Developers Agreement shall include the requirement for construction of the sidewalk as proposed. C. Pay the park dedication fee of $10,000 d. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. e. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated December 7, 2013. f. A construction management plan will be required for the overall development of the site, and- for-each individual home construction. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. h. Establishment of a permanent tree preservation easement as demonstrated on the grading and tree preservation plan. i. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road. r j. The applicant must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street, and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration shall be subject to approval of the director of engineering. k. A stop sign is required to be installed on the new street approaching Morningside Road. Clear sight lines shall be maintained from the intersection. Use of Lot 7 for the overall grading of the development will require compensation to the City of Edina. A restoration plan shall be submitted by the applicant subject to review and approval by the City Council. 11 Appearing for the Applicant Franklin and Carol Sidell, property owners and Peter Knable, Terra Engineering. Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked Chuck Rickart, Edina traffic consultant to speak to this issue. Mr. Rickart addressed the Commission and reported that his study found there were no operational concerns for either alternative (through- street or cul de sac). Rickart said with either roadway alignment stop signs) should be placed on the new street approaching Morningside Road. Continuing, Rickart said clear view is OK; however one should keep in mind if the Commission prefers the through- street cut through traffic could be an issue. Another suggestion Rickart expressed was recommending that the driveway adjacent to the new street for (4408 Morningside Road) should be realigned to eliminate turning conflicts. Commissioner Carpenter asked Mr. Rickart his opinion on reducing the right -of -way. Rickart responded in his opinion a 24 -foot side road would be adequate. Applicant Presentation Mr. Knable addressed the Commission and explained that two neighborhood meetings were held apprising neighbors of the project. Knable clarified that their preference is the cul de sac option. Continuing, Knable explained that the proposed lots vary in size from 10 - 23 thousand square feet with the average lot size roughly 14,000 square feet. Concluding'Knable noted the proposed lots exceed the median standard. Mr. Sidell, 423.2 Oakdale, informed the Commission his family are long- time residents of Edina and have owned the subject lots for 50 years. Sidell said their mother is getting older and at this time the family needs to proceed with a plan for these lots. Sidell said that he believes the proposal they submitted maintains the character of the neighborhood and if the Commission supports the cul de sac option impact would be less. Discussion Commissioner Platteter noted the areas proposed for preservation and questioned how much would be lost to the "road ". Mr. Knable responded that much depends on the option chosen, the through street or the cul de sac. Continuing, Knable said they will grade only what "they have to" and all lots would be custom graded. With the cul de sac 12 option there is.also a preservation area. Concluding, Knable said their goal is to save as many trees as possible and redevelop the site maintaining,the character. Chair Grabiel opened the public hearing. The following residents expressed concerns about the proposed subdivision,request: Richard and Sarah Hardy, 4408 Morningside Road. Angela Deen, 4301 Eton Place. Katrina McDonald. 4257 Ottawa, St. Louis Park Pete Killilea, 4236 Lynn Avenue. Greg Anderson, 4212 Oakdale Avenue. Connie Wilde, 4413 Morningside Road. Patricia Goodwin, 4417 Morningside Road. Jennifer Colburn, 4247 Lynn Avenue. Jim Wilde, 4413 Morningside Road. James Schwert, 4231 Oakdale Avenue. Doug Junker, 4216 Oakdale Avenue. David Deen, 4301 Eton Place. Seth Hannula, 4307 Oakdale Avenue. Frank Sidell, 4221 Lynn Ave, applicant, told the Commission he grew up in the Sidell family home noting that Morningside was annexed to Edina in 1966. Sidell said that he has lived in the Morningside neighborhood for the majority of his life and wants as the neighbors do to see his family home nicely developed. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone else would like to speakto-this issue; being none, Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Mr. Knable. clarified that the Slidell's would be paying for the cul de sac and /or road. With regard to individual lots and one builder vs. multiple builders it's too early in the process to know how this will play out. Chair Grabiel asked the applicants how in their opinion this subdivision addresses and preserves the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Knable responded that in his opinion the character of the neighborhood is being preserved by maintaining the natural amenities of the site; its vegetation and steep slopes. Knable said at this time he cannot speak to individual house style or what the current character is of Morningside homes, reiterating maintaining the physical characteristics of the site is a goal. 13 Commissioner Fischer referred to piece of city property at Lynn and Littel and asked Teague if that land was available to the community; is it a park or not. Teague responded that piece of land was tax forfeit property, adding'that it's also a very low spot and may have forfeited because of water run -off issues. Teague explained that the City "owns" a number of.unimproved properties throughout the City through tax forfeiture. Teague said City policy is to not sell these parcels but to leave them as open space. If residents want this as a park they would have to petition the City and be subject to council direction. Commissioner Staunton in addressing comments from residents on road damage asked if there is anything in the Code that addresses extra wear and tear during the construction phase, pointing out that the roads into this area are not "main" streets. Planner Teague referred to the City's Construction Maintenance Plan that addresses the construction phase, adding damage to the street(s) would need to be addressed by the developer. Continuing, Teague said during the construction phase City Staff could recommend routes and a road inventory could be taken prior to construction and after. Staunton commented that routing construction traffic would be a big help. Commissioner Staunton commented that one word that keeps reoccurring is character, adding that so far no one has addressed the proposed lot sizes. Staunton pointed out the proposed new lots are significantly larger in area and width than the majority of the lots within the Morningside neighborhood. Staunton questioned if these lots could be considered too large. Staunton said he realizes Ordinance states a minimum lot width of 75 -feet; however, it appears in this neighborhood the majority of lots are 50 -feet wide and were platted before that Ordinance change. Staunton said he is just "throwing this out" for further thought. Commissioner Platteter reported he lives in Morningside and his entire block is comprised of 50 -foot wide lots; and to him that's the character of his neighborhood. It was acknowledged that the 75 -foot lot width reflects the "suburban" development on the west side of Edina; however, Morningside was developed with'different and varied lot sizes Chair Grabiel pointed out the minimum lots size in Edina is 75 -feet adding that the City Council recently denied an applicant the ability to subdivide his 100 -foot wide lot into two 50 -foot lots. Grabiel said lot size may need to be readdressed through ordinance; adding in his opinion it won't work to reduce these lots to 50 -foot lots. Staunton said he agrees pointing out there were instances were variances were granted to allow redevelopment of 100 -foot lots into 50 -foot lots. Staunton said his focus was more on maintaining the character of Morningside and what's the right thing for this area. Concluding, Staunton noted this is an area of smaller lot widths. 14 Commissioner Fischer said he really appreciates the efforts of the family and their representatives. He pointed out the easiest way for the family would have been to sell their land to a developer and act innocent about what happens next. Again, Fischer stated he appreciates the courage and effort of the property owners. Continuing, Fischer said in saying that; there still is the problem in that everyone has a different idea on how to maintain the character of Morningside. Fischer said he finds three - interest groups; 1) save the trees and slopes, 2) connectivity /through street 3) cul de sac. Fischer said much of the problem is. with "us" and the Zoning Ordinance. Fischer pointed out in much of Edina plats were developed under different zoning requirements, adding the problems the City routinely sees seems to occur mostly in areas that were platted and developed prior to ordinance changes, especially the 75- foot width etc. Fischer noted the Ordinance drives this. Concluding, Fischer said the Commission worked hard to establish a PUD for redevelopment; however, that "tool" was eliminated from residential development and without that tool it is very difficult to find solutions. Fischer said there are so many options to consider with this replat, can pedestrians stay connected without the cars, can a narrower roadway be platted to provide better buffer for the adjacent neighbor, etc. and should smaller building pads be considered? There is much to consider. Fischer asked if the applicant would consider taking another look at their proposal. Frank Sidell acknowledged that the design presented was their best effort to meet code, adding the through street design is conforming; no variances would be required. Sidell said as a family they agreed the through street wasn't the way to proceed. He also said he was surprised by the suggestion of smaller lots. Concluding, Sidell said his mother is 89 years old and still lives in the family home, adding they are not on a "fast track "; however if something happens to their mother the family would be on a fast track. Planner Teague explained the sketch plan process to the applicants, adding final action on what was submitted this evening needs to occur by March 5th _ Commissioner Potts said he recognizes the uniqueness of this site, adding continuing this to give thought to other options would.be a good idea. Commissioner Forrest agreed that this location is unique and there are challenges due to its topography. Forrest acknowledged redevelopment is difficult in a fully developed neighborhood and redevelopment of this area will have a large impact. Forrest pointed out redevelopment could occur quickly or building could go on for a long period of time. Concluding, Forrest said all redevelopment should also be guided by the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Carpenter said he has listened to the conversation adding much of what the Commission has been discussing appears to be modifying the proposal. He questioned if that's the Commissions intent, noting ordinances can't be modified during review process. 15 Commissioner Schroeder agreed adding that experience is three dimensional and the Commission may need to find a pattern and work backwards. Schroeder said in his opinion this proposal isn't there yet; and as was suggested the Commission should take a step back and allow time to formulate alternatives. Schroeder asked the applicants if they would consider a continuance. Commissioner Platteter suggested hosting something similar to a design charatte to help work through this. He asked Planner Teague if there is a precedent for this. Teague responded to the best of his knowledge the City hasn't done anything like that on an individual development level. Teague pointed out the Commission developed the Sketch Plan Review process, adding the applicant could use that tool. W. Knable said he understands where the Commission is going with this; however, without a.PUD process he doesn't know how anything could happen. Continuing, Knable said he understands smaller lots make smaller houses; however, what the City May want the neighbors may not want. He added,it appears to him the residents want less density not more and less traffic not more. Concluding, Knable said he doesn't want to work on a sketch plan that isn't well received by everyone. Commissioner Fischer said more lots may not be the answer, but could be considered. Fischer added the goal would be to create a project that meets the character of Morningside. Commissioner Schroeder commented that at this time there is a proposal before the Commission and the Commission can either move to approve or deny or ask the applicant if they would consider taking a step back by tabling the request to allow more time to work with the Commission and "staff on possible alternatives. Mr. Knable told the Commission in discussing this with the property owners they are in favor of continuing their request and taking another look at the plat. Continuing, Knable said he would be willing to work with the City Planner and a few Commissioners and return with a sketch plan for review. Knable said he also wants to keep in contact with the neighbors during this process. Chair Grabiel noted the March 5th deadline and asked Planner Teague if that could be extended. Teague responded in the affirmative. Motion 1 Commissioner Staunton moved to continue the Preliminary Plat for Franklin and Carol Sidell to the January 23rd meeting of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. Staunton also recommended that Commissioners volunteer to work with City staff and applicant on the possibility of revising the preliminary plat. Potts, Platteter, Schroeder and Fischer volunteered. Motion was amended to appoint Potts, Platteter, Schroeder, and Fischer to work with the applicant. Ali voted aye; motion carried to continue the meeting to the January 23, 2013 meeting of the Planning Commission. Chair Grabiel thanked Potts, Platteter, Schroeder and Fischer for volunteering. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Grabiel acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Grabiel thanked Potts, Platteter and Forrest for their continuing work on the Ordinance. Chair Grabiel reminded Commissioners there is no meeting on the 26th the Planning Commission will next meet on January 9th IX. STAFF COMMENTS None. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Potts moved adjournment at 10:45 pm. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. lacy -e LfOoRewa0zer Respectfully Submitted 17 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 19, 2012 11:15 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the meeting to order at 11:15 P.M. on June 19, 2012. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL L17,2012, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for April 19, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Ill. AMENDMENT NO. I TO SOUTHDALE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT —APPROVED Mr. Neal introduced Amendment No. 1 to the Southdale Redevelopment Agreement and concern of Simon Property Group relating to its ability to appeal the market value of Southdale Center property during the term of the agreement. Mr. Neal stated further discussions were held but staff felt this material change to the agreement needed to be considered by the Housing And Redevelopment Authority. In exchange for the City removing the bar for valuation challenges, Simon Property Group would agree to a higher baseline evaluation from January 2, 2012. Mr. Neal indicated there had been considerable discussion relating to this amendment, it was negotiated in good faith, and the proposed language was agreed to by staff and Simon Property Group. He noted at this point, time was running out due to the State - imposed deadline of June 30, 2012. Laurie Van Dalen, Southdale Center Manager, advised the draft document relating to Metro Transit had been received from the Metropolitan Council. Southdale Center had agreed, in conversation, to the changes after the April City HRA meeting. The Commissioners noted the HRA had supported the original language to make sure the City was not in tax court with Southdale Center every year if it was giving an interest -free loan. Jay Lindgren, Dorsey & Whitney, City bond counsel, indicated he had drafted the original language that limited the ability of Southdale Center to appeal because it was the most favorable to the City and regularly agreed to in this type of agreement. Discussion ensued on the proposed language and it was noted if the property value was increased by the minimum, 2.5% per annum, the accumulative effect would increase the market value $31 million, or a 27% increase. It was also noted the increment would be used to write down the principal on the loan so if an appeal was successful, there would be less increment available for use. Mr. Neal answered questions of the HRA related to the appeal process. The HRA discussed the need to address pedestrian connectivity, possibly through an Urban Land Institute planning process, landscaping, and the transit station. With regard to the transit station, Mr. Lindgren explained the transit easement had to be finalized within 120 days of signing the agreement. If not agreed to, the terms of the loan would not have to go forward. Mr. Lindgren assured the HRA there was sufficient time within the 120 -day process and no funds would be disbursed until that was finalized. Ms. Van Dalen stated the drawings submitted for permit included a civil package that addressed access from the street to the Mall entrance, lighted and landscaped pathways, and landscaped entrances. She noted Minutes /Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority /June 19, 2012 Southdale Center had indicated the City needed to address how to get pedestrians across 66`h Street and Southdale Center would addressed pedestrian passage from that point to the entrance.' Mr. Lindgren offered revised language to address the Council's preference to indicate the Mall's market value changed from year to year. Commissioner Sprague made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brindle, approving Amendment No. 1 to Southdale Redevelopment Agreement, revising Section:.4 6 to indicate: "...Mall Property unless and only to the extent that, it is greater than such agreed -upon amount as determined annually..." The HRA acknowledged the desire of Simon Property Group for some protection from the City having complete unilateral ability to raise property values without being able to appeal for a period of nine years; however, the proposed amendment would give the City the ability to raise the value of property during that time period, cumulatively,. by 30 %. The HRA indicated its support was predicated on a satisfactory arrangement with the bus facility and it did not appreciate this matter being raised just days before the deadline. The HRA confirmed it looked forward to continued cooperation to make this area more pedestrian accessible including participating in a future planning process. Member Bennett stated she remained unable to find public purpose and would not be voting to support the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:20 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director o e F7,1 1) i) CIA "'- �y 1P�pb To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: III. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: January 22, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013- 01, Authorizing Purchase of Property at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: The City / Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has studied the parking availability at the 50th and France business district and found that additional public parking is needed to support the continued success of this district. The study confirmed that the existing North Parking Ramp at 3936 -3940 West 49 -1/2 Street has the ability to be expanded to provide additional public parking for customers and employees. Construction of additional parking at the North Ramp is preferred prior to the renovation of the South and Middle Ramps. This new parking will make up for the temporary loss of spaces during the renovation process. The single story building located west of the North Ramp at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street is currently for lease or for sale. The property owners have expressed a willingness to consider a lease or sale to the City /HRA. Authorization is sought to negotiate terms of a purchase agreement with the owners. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -01 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -01 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AT 3944 WEST 49-1/2 STREET WHEREAS, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority has previously constructed a public parking ramp located at 3936 -3940 West 49-1/2 Street; and WHEREAS,, studies have confirmed the need for additional parking in the 50th and France business district as well as the feasibility of the existing parking ramp,.to be expanded to provide additional parking, and WHEREAS, the owners of the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (P.I.D. 1802824140035) have expressed a willingness to discuss a possible sale of the property; and WHEREAS, acquisition of the parcel serves a public purpose since this parcel is necessary to expand public parking options for the business district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority authorizes staff to enter into negotiations for the acquisition of property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street. Attest: Dated: January 22, 2013. Ann Swenson, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR James B. Hovland, Chair I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Executive Director i City Hall • 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 Phone 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: December 19, 2012 To: City Council From: Jackie Hoogenakker Re: 2012 Planning Commission Application Submittals and to -date recap MEMO *It should be noted that multiple actions were required for certain development/re- development projects (rezoning, conditional use, variances, final development plan, etc.) and may not be listed. The following is a list of 2012 Planning Commission application submissions Certificates of Appropriateness: 1. 4621 Edina Boulevard — Attached garage with addition above 2. 4907 Arden Avenue — Add a front entry canopy 3. 4511 Bruce Avenue — New detached garage and addition 4. 4603 Browndale Avenue — Add front entry canopy 5. 4620 Moorland Avenue — New detached garage and addition 6. 4524 Bruce Avenue — Construction of new home 7. 4624 Bruce Avenue — Construction of new home 8. 4601 Wooddale Avenue — New addition above existing garage /reface 9. 4901 Bruce Avenue — Replace existing garage add addition above Conditional Use Permit: 1. CUP W/ Variances — 5421 France and 3717 Fuller Street 2. CUP — 5537 Park Place — New Home 3. CUP — 4805 E Sunnyslope Road — New Home 4. CUP-4710 Golf Terrace— New Home 5. 4113 W. 54`h Street— Church addition. No action. Citv of Fdinn • d801 Wpst 50th Street • Minn. MN 55A9A Lot Division: . Lot line rearrangement — 4236 Lynn Avenue 2. Lot line rearrangement - 6240/6244 Brookview Avenue 3. Lot line rearrangement — 5100 Ridge Rd and 5101 Green Farms Road 4. Party wall division - 7311 & 7309 Glouchester Drive 5. Party wall division.— 3928& 3932 49`h Street West Plan Review: I. As of December 19, 20112 Planning Staff reviewed 97 new home permits. 2. As of December 19, 2012 Planning Staff reviewed 139 additions to existing homes. *This count is residential (R- I )only and does not include residential mechanical review (pools; air conditioner placement, etc.) Rezoning: I. To PUD -6500 France & 4005 W 65`h Street for Mount Development 2. To PUD 3420 Heritage Drive for Erik's Ranch Sign Permits: I. 130 Sign permits 2. .56 Bench sign permits Site Plan: 1. 7501 France Avenue — Coffee Shop Construction 2. 10 Southdale Center - Construct apartments Sketch Plan Review: 1. West 49`h Street — Senior Development ( Reviewed twice) 2. 6500 France Avenue — Medical Office Building 3. 7501 France Avenue - Coffee Shop Construction I 4. 10 Southdale Center — Apartment concept 5. 7700 France Avenue - Construct restaurant on site 6. 7171 France Avenue - Byerly's redevelopment concept Subdivisions: 11. 6120 Brookview Avenue — 2 -lot subdivision 2. 5945 Concord Avenue — 2 -lot subdivision 3. 4232 Oakdale Avenue - 8 -lot subdivision Variances: I . 4115 Morningside Road — Setback variance from Right -of -Way 2. 4613 Browndale Avenue — Rear yard setback variance 3. 5025 Nob Hill — Front yard setback variance 4. 5225 Schaefer Road — Real estate sign variance (withdrawn) 5. 5101 Arcadia - Front yard setback variance 6. 6617 Parkwood Lane — Front yard setback variance 7. 5701 Normandale Road, Sign variance 8. 4509.Garrison Lane — Front yard setback variance 9. 5000 Schaefer Road — Front yard setback variance 10.. 3928 West 440 St — Lot area variance 11. 7312 Wooddale Avenue — Side yard setback variance 12. 7501 Ikola Way —Sign Variance 13.5801 Crescent Terrace- Front yard setback variance 14.5201 Wooddale Avenue — Side street setback variance n Zoning Compliance Letter: * The Planning Department drafted 39 Commercial /Office /Industrial Zoning Compliance Letters. *not included in this count are zoning requests for letters for residential properties (R -1 & R -2). Zoning Ordinance Update: PUD -1 - 6996 France Avenue PUD -2 - 3420 Heritage Drive PUD -3 - 6500 France Avenue Produce stands in the RMD District Regulations on utility building and structures in all zoning districts.